HomeMy WebLinkAbout12/15/1987 - RegularOF R.,ANO~
F
~'~` . A L
2 ~p
~ ~
2 /.~}
`sF 8 ~~ 88 ~ ~~,.:~
S°V~CENTENNIA~ ~~~~~,~
A Bu+uri~irlBeginning
ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUpERVIS
ORS
ACTION AGENDA
DECEMBER 15, 1987
Welcome to t
meetin he Roanoke Count
the f 9s are held on t Y Board of S
ourth Tuesda he Second Tuesda upervisors meetin
p'm on the fourth Y at 3;00 p,m• Y of the month g• Regular
schedule Tuesday of a Public Hearin at 2:00
will be announced, ach month, 9s will be heara.m., and
Deviations from at 7:Op
AFTERN N SESSI N this
A• OPENING
CEREMONIES (3:00 p.M.)
1 • Roll Call
2' Invocation:
The Reverend Sam Crews
3 • Pled
ge °f Allegiance to t
B• COUNTY he United States Fla
ADMINISTRATORS COMMENTS g•
ELIZABETH STOKES GAVE REPORT
PORTRAITS. ON T
HE RESTORATION OF THE COURTHOUSE
ECH ANNOUNCED
COUNCIL F ROANOKE COUNTY
OR THE DEFENSIVE HAD RECEIVED AWARD
DRIVING PROGRAM FROM THE SAFETY
BLJ PRESENTED STATE OF ROANOKE
AND SEAT BELT POLICy•
COUNTY COMMENTS
C' REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD, 0
ITEMS.
ADDITION OF R C~NGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA
THE MECHANICAL A~NSENT AGENDA
REFUSE - A UTHORIZATION FOR
COLLECTION VEHICLE. LEASE
PURCHASE OF
D• PROCLAMATIONS
. RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS AND AW
1• Resolutions of ARDS
Hollins Appreciation
Community Develo tO Contributors to the
BLJ/HCN TO APPROVE pment ProJect•
UVV
w
2• Resolution of Appreciation to Thomas Blaylock,
Commonwealth's Attorney.
BLJ/SAM TO APPROVE
UW
3• Resolution of Appreciation Upon the Retirement of
Sheriff 0. S. Foster.
AHB/LG TO APPROVE
UW
4• Resolution of Appreciation to Alan H. Brittle for his
service as a member of the Board of Supervisors
BLJ/HCN TO APPROVE
UVV
E• NEW BUSINESS
1• Presentation of the 1987 Audit Report
BLJ/LG TO ACCEPT AUDIT REPORT AND APPROPRIATE NET ADDITION OF
$1,052,806 TO FUND BALANCE - URC
2• Report on the Sesquicentennial Activities
3• Authorization to amend the 1987 holiday schedule.
AHB/SAM TO APPROVE STAFF RECOMMENDATION
URC
4• Authorization to amend the restrictive covenants
for Mountain View Farm Technological Park.
BLJ DIRECTED TO POSTPONE UNTIL 1/12/87 TO ENSURE THAT PROPER
SPECIFIC LEGAL LANGUAGE IS INCLUDED IN AGREEMENT. ECH TO CONTACT
THE AREA RESIDENTS AND INVITE TO 1/12 MEETING.
F• REQUEST FOR WORK SESSIONS
BLJ REQUESTED WORK SESSION ON INDIVIDUAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS
FOR 1/26/88
G• REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS
1• Request for a public hearin
15.1-29.14 of the 1950 CodegopuVirginiaoaseamended
authorizing the imposition of fees for cross
connection inspections.
2
HCN/AHB TO APPROVE WITH AMENDMENT THAT LEGAL ADS BE PUBLISHED
12/29/87 and 1/5/88
H• APPOINTMENTS
1• Court Service Unit Advisor
Family Services Advisory Boarduncil/Youth and
2• Health Department Board of Directors
3 • Library Board
LG NOMINATED A. EDWARD HUMPHRIES TO 4-YEAR TERM FROM WINDSOR
HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT.
4• Mental Health Services of the Roanoke Valley
I- REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS
JOHNSON: DIRECTED THAT DEPT.
OF TIAL WELLNESS PROGRAM DURINGAPAYEFORRPERFORMANDE A STUDY
AND THAT THIS PROGRAM BE REVIEWED BY EMPLOYEE ADVISORYCCOMMITTEE
AND BE INCLUDED IN FUTURE WORK SESSION ON PAY. FOR PERFORMANCE.
J• CONSENT AGENDA
ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE
CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WILL BE
ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED
BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE
REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED
SEPARATELY.
HCN/AHB TO REMOVE ITEM J-5 FOR DISCUSSION AND APPROVE J 1-4 - U
RC
1• Confirmation of Committee A
Planning Commission and thepMentaleHealth Services
of the Roanoke Valley.
2• Request for acceptance of the following roads into
the Virginia Department of Transportation
Secondary System:
a• Sean Lane and Olde Tavern Road
b• Country Lane
c• Forest Edge Drive
d• Canter Drive, Cavalier Drive, Chaucer's Court
and Gloucester Court
e• Meadwood Drive and Quail Place
3
3• Acceptance of water and sewer facilities servin
Branderwood Section 3, g
4• Authorization to execute contracts with
Telephone Company to establish Centrex Rate
Stability Plan C-Virginia.
5. Authorization for Lease Purchase of
Arm Refuse Collection Vehicle.
ITEM J-5 - HCN/SAM TO APPROVE
AYES: AHB,BLJ,SAM,HCN
NAYS : LG
K• CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS
L• REPORTS
the Mechanical
M• EXECUTIVE SESSION pursuant to the Code of Vir in'
2.1-344 (a).(2) TO CONSIDER A REAL ESTATE MATTERla
BLJ/HCN - UVV AT 4:35 pM
EVENIN SESSION (7.00 v M ~
O• PUBLIC HEARINGS
1287-1 Public hearin for
establishmentgof the1SixeYearpConstruction
for the secondary system of the State Highwaysnfor
Fiscal Year 1988-1994
SET WORK SESSION FOR 1/12/88
1287-2 Petition of
Plantation Enter rises for a Special
Exception Permit to operate a
34.77 acre tract located at 56211P1antationnRoad
in the Hollins Magisterial District.
BLJ/HCN TO APPROVE
URC
1287-3 Petition of
John Newcomb to rezone with certain
conditions a 1.714 acre parcel from R-3
Residential to B-2 Business to
restaurant, located at the northeastruct a
corner of
4
Glen Heather Drive and Route 419 within the
Windsor Hills Magisterial District.
HCN/LG TO CONTINUE UNTIL 1/26/87 FOR PETITIONER TO M
RESIDENTS EET WITH AREA
AYES: AHB,LG,HCH,BLJ
NAYS : SAM
1287-4 Petition of Jones & Jones Associates Ar
rezone a 1.086 acre tract from g_1 chitects to
B-2 Business and B-3 Business to Business, to
convenience store and vehicle lubricationtfacilit
located on the north side
Catawba Magisterial Distri~t.Route 117 within they
SAM/BLJ TO APPROVE
URC
1287-5 Petition of Peter L,
acre tract from B_2 Williams to rezone a 5.08
to construct multifamBlsiness to R-3 Residential
7655A and 7655B Marson RoadawithinstheoHollidnst
Magisterial District.
5
BLJ/HCN TO REFER BACK TO PLANNING COMMISSION
URC
1287-6 Petition of Fralin and Waldron Inc, to r
2.5 acre tract from R-1, Residential to B?lne a
Business, to construct a
the west side of Parking area, located on
Route 419 south of its
intersection with Kea
Windsor Hills Ma 1 gy Road within the
g'sterial District.
LG/AHB TO APPROVE
URC
1287-7 Petition of Valle Develo ers Inc., re
vacation of a sanitary sewer Zuesting
Section 2, Kingston Court in theeWendsor lot 12A,
Magisterial District. Hills
LG/BLJ TO APPROVE - URC
ECH DIRECTED TO TO INFORM
CONCERNING FUTURE VACATIONCpFT~CTORS AND HOMEBUILDERS ASSOCIATION
BE BUILT EASEMENTS SO THAT ADDITIONAL HOMES CAN
1287-8 Public hearin
g for the adoption of a resolution
pursuant to Section 15.1-23g(e) of the 1950
of Virginia, as amended for the acquisition of de
easements for the completion of the Starke
Main and Gravit Sewer pro• - v Force
HCN/SAM TO APPROVE RESO ect.
URC
1287-g Public Hearin
relocation of gther public comments on the
from the old Roanokentral absentee voter recinct
to the Roanoke Count County Courthouse, Salem, Va.
NO ONE y Administration Center.
PRESENT
P• FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES
1• Ordinance
of the 1950ursuant to Sections 24.1-37 and 24.1-233.1
Code of Virginia, as amended
the relocation and establishment ~ authorizing
voter election district in °f a central absentee
Administration Center for alle Roanoke County
Roanoke County, elections held within
AHB/BLJ TO APPROVE AND WAIVE 2ND READING
BECAUSE OF EMERGENCY SITUATION - URC
6
2• Ordinance authorizin
estate 9 the acquisition of certain real
the RoanoketRegWOnalnAireortt a
y of Roanoke adjacent to
said real estate in p ~ nd the conveyance of
exchange for certain real estate
for an access road and a
with the Roanoke Re lonaPPAo~al of a certain agreement
g port Commission.
BLJ/LG TO APPROVE 1ST READING - URC
2ND READING - 1/12/88
3• Ordinance amendin
the Roanoke Countg Chapter 7, "Building Regulations
~~
Section 7-31, "Genera de by repealing Article III, of
"Plumbing Contractors' Bondtractors Bond," Section 7-32
"Electrical Contractors' and Section 7-33,
Bond"
HCN/AHB TO APPROVE 1ST READING - URC
2ND READING - 1/12/88
Q• SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES
R• CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS
NONE
S• ADJOURNMENT AT 10:00 p•M•
REORGANIZATIONAL MEETING TO 1/4/88 AT 9:00 AM FOR
r
OF pOANp~.~
~ ~
ti 9
2 ~
a ~~~~~ ~ ~
p ,~ ~ .~~~~~~~
16 rc.a 88
O
S~SQbfCENTENN~P~
n Burrrrr~uiBrgr'„„;„g ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
DECEMBER 15, 1987
Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meeting. Regular
meetings are held on the second Tuesday of the month at 2:00 p.m., and
the fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public Hearings will be heard at 7:00
p.m on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this
schedule will be announced.
AFTERNOON SESSION
A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.)
1. Roll Call.
2. Invocation: The Reverend Sam Crews
3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag.
B• COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS
C. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA
ITEMS.
D. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS AND AWARDS
1. Resolutions of Appreciation to contributors to the
Hollins Community Development Project.
2. Resolution of Appreciation Upon the Retirement of
Sheriff 0. S . Foster .
E. NEW BUSINESS
1. Presentation of the 1987 Audit Report
2. Report on the Sesquicentennial Activities
3. Authorization to amend the 1987 holiday schedule.
4. Authorization to amend the restrictive covenants
for Mountain View Farm Technological Park.
F. REQUEST FOR WORK SESSIONS
G. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. Request for a public hearing pursuant to Section
15.1-29.14 of the 1950 Code of Virginia as amended
authorizing the imposition of fees for cross
connection inspections.
H. APPOINTMENTS
1. Court Service Unit Advisory Council/Youth and
Family Services Advisory Board
2. Health Department Board of Directors
3. Library Board
4. Mental Health Services of the Roanoke Valley
I. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS
J. CONSENT AGENDA
ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE
CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WILL BE
ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED
BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE
REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED
SEPARATELY.
1. Confirmation of Committee Appointments to the
Planning Commission and the Mental Health Services
of the Roanoke Valley.
2. Request for acceptance of the following roads into
the Virginia Department of Transportation
Secondary System:
a. Sean Lane and Olde Tavern Road
b. Country Lane
c• Forest Edge Drive
d. Canter Drive, Cavalier Drive, Chaucer's Court
and Gloucester Court
e. Meadwood Drive and Quail Place
2
3. Acceptance of water and sewer facilities serving
Branderwood Section 3.
4. Authorization to execute contracts with C&P
Telephone Company to establish Centrex Rate
Stability Plan C-Virginia.
K. CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS
L. REPORTS
M. EXECUTIVE SESSION pursuant to the Code of Virginia
2.1-344 (a).
EVENING SESSION (7.00 P M )
D. PUBLIC HEARINGS
1287-1 Public hearing for citizen input on the
establishment of the Six Year Construction Plan
for the secondary system of the State Highways for
Fiscal Year 1988-1994,
1287-2 Petition of Plantation Enterprises for a Special
Exception Permit to operate a golf course on a
34.77 acre tract located at 5621 Plantation Road
in the Hollins Magisterial District.
1287-3 Petition of John Newcomb to rezone with certain
conditions a 1.714 acre parcel from R-3
Residential to B-2 Business to construct a
restaurant, located at the northeast corner of
Glen Heather Drive and Route 419 within the
Windsor Hills Magisterial District.
1287-4 Petition of Jones & Jones Associates Architects to
rezone a 1.086 acre tract from B-1 Business, to
B-2 Business and B-3 Business to construct a
convenience store and vehicle lubrication facility
located on the north side of Route 117 within the
Catawba Magisterial District.
1287-5 Petition of Peter L. Williams to rezone a 5.08
acre tract from B-2, Business to R-3 Residential
to construct multifamily apartments, located at
7655A and 7655B Marson Road within the Hollins
Magisterial District.
1287-6 Petition of Fralin and Waldron Inc. to rezone a
2.5 acre tract from R-1, Residential to B-1
Business, to construct a parking area, located on
the west side of Route 419 south of its
intersection with Keagy Road within the
Windsor Hills Magisterial District.
1287-7 Petition of Valley Developers, Inc re uestin
vacation of a sanitary sewer easement on lot 12A,
Section 2, Kingston Court in the Windsor Hills
Magisterial District.
P.
4.
R.
1287-8 Public hearing for the adoption of a resolution
pursuant to Section 15.1-238(e) of the 1950 Code
of Virginia, as amended for the acquisition of
easements for the completion of the Starkey Force
Main and Gravity Sewer Proiect
1287-9 Public Hearing for public comments on the
relocation of the central absentee voter recinct
from the old Roanoke County Courthouse, Salem, Va.
to the Roanoke County Administration Center.
FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES
1. Ordinance pursuant to Sections 24.1-37 and 24.1-233.1
of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, authorizing
the relocation and establishment of a central absentee
voter election district in the Roanoke County
Administration Center for all elections held within
Roanoke County.
2. Ordinance authorizing the acquisition of certain real
estate located within the City of Roanoke adjacent to
the Roanoke Regional Airport, and the conveyance of
said real estate in exchange for certain real estate
for an access road and approval of a certain agreement
with the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission.
3. Ordinance amending Chapter 7, "Building Regulations" of
the Roanoke County Code by repealing Article III,
Section 7-31, "General Contractors' Bond," Section 7-32
"Plumbing Contractors' Bond," and Section 7-33,
"Electrical Contractors' Bond"
SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES
CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS
S• ADJOURNMENT
OF ROANp,~.~
z ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~~t~tu~~e
o C~~~~~
v a
~ 8 E5o 88
SFSQUICENTENN~P~'
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
A Beauti ful Bcginnin~ BOB JOHNSON. CHAIRMAN
HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
LEE GARRETT. VICE-CHAIRMAN
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
ELMER C. HODGE ALAN H. BRITTLE
CAVE SPRING IAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
STEVEN A. MCGRAW
CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
December 18 , 19 8 7 HARRY C. NICICEN$
VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
Reverend Sam Crews
Coopers Cove Baptist Church
c/o Roanoke County Administration Center
Roanoke, Virginia 24018
Dear Rev. Crews:
On behalf of the Board of Supervisors, I would like to
take this opportunity to let you know of our appreciation for
your attending the meeting on Tuesday, December 15, 1987 to offer
the invocation.
We feel it is most important to ask God's blessing on
these meetings so that all is done according to His will and for
the good of all citizens.
Thank you again for sharing your time with us.
~~ ~~
Bob L. J nson, Chairman
Roanoke ounty Board of Supervisors
mha
P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24018-07 9 8 (703) 772'2004
O~ AOANp,I,~ Ir'
z ~ ~ p ~~~~~~.~e
z ~~~t~ ~~
a ~ ,
18 .'~~ 88
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
gFSQU1CENTENN~P~
A BwutifulBcginning BOB JOHNSON. CHAIRMAN
HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
LEE GARRETT. VICE-CHAIRMAN
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
ELMER C. HODGE ALAN H. BRITTLE
CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
STEVEN A. MCGRAW
CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
December 18, 1987 HARRY C. NICKENS
VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
Members of the Electoral Board
Roanoke County
Attached is a copy of Ordinance No: 121587-10 concerning the
relocation of the Central Absentee Voter Election District. This
resolution was adopted by the Board of Supervisors at their
meeting on December 15, 1987.
If you need further information, please do not hesitate to
contact me.
Sincerely,
.J~r~ .
Mary H. Allen
Deputy Clerk
Attachment
P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24018-0798 (703) 772-2004
O~ POANp~.~
ti '' ` 9
Z
Z
J a
18 ~~ 88
SFS~UICEN7ENN~P
A Iitauri~ul8tl;irtnin~
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
EIMER C. HODGE
C~nun~~ n~ ~nttnuk~
December 21, 1987
Dr. Fred P. Roessel, Jr.
Executive Director
MHS of Roanoke Valley
Suite 410
920 South Jefferson Street
Roanoke, Virginia 24016-4494
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
BOB JOHNSON. CHAIRMAN
HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
LEE GARRETT. VICE-CHAIRMAN
WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
ALAN H. BRITTLE
CAVE S~'RING IAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
STEVEN A. MCGRAW
Cg7AWgA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
HARRY C. NICKENS
VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
Dear Dr. Roessel:
This is to advise that at their meeting on Tuesday,
December l5, 1987, the Board of Supevisors voted unanimously to
confirm the reappointment of Henry L. Woodward as an at-large
member of the Mental Health Services Board of Directors.
On behalf of the SueprovM~°rWoodwardeourtsincerefthanks
Roanoke County, please convey t this
and appreciation for his willingness to accep
reappointment. ~~
i-~cer
Bob L. Jc/~nson, Chairman
Board of ~CUpervisors
BLJ/bjh
cc: Mr. Henry L. Woodward
P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24018-0798 (7031 772-2004
O~ PpANp~F
~ G~
Can 1~•1{
o ~~~ ~~ ~~~~t~~ ~e
J d 1J
18 ' E50 88
SFSQUICENTENN~P~
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
A Brnuti~ull3r~inrun~ BOB JOHNSON. CHAIRMAN
HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR December 21, 1987 LEE GARRETT. VICE-CHAIRMAN
WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
ELMER C. HODGE ALAN H. BRITTLE
CAVE SPRING IAAGISTE RIAL DISTRICT
STEVEN A. MCGRAW
CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
HARRY C. NICKENS
VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
Ms. Carolyn Flippen
2343 Coachman Circle
Roanoke, Virginia 24012
Dear Ms. Flippen:
The Board of Supervisors have asked me to express on
their behalf their sincere appreciation for your previous service
to the Roanoke County Planning Commission. Citizens so
responsive to the needs of their community and willing to give of
themselves and their time are indeed all too scarce.
This is to advise that at their meeting held on Tuesday,
December 15, 1987, the Board of Supervisors voted unanimously to
reappoint you as a member of Roanoke County Planning Commission
for a 4-year term. Your term will expire on December 31, 1991.
State law provides that any person elected, re-elected,
appointed to any body be furnished a copy of the Freedom of
Information Act; your copy is enclosed. We are also sending you
a copy of the Conflicts of Interest Act.
On behalf of the Supervisors and the citizens of Roanoke
County, please accept our sincere thanks and appreciation for
your willingness to accept this appointment.
Very truly yours,
~~
Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
MHA/bjh
Enclosures
cc: Rob Stalzer
P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 2 4018-07 9 6 (703) 772'2004
o~ aoArvo,~~
~^ A ~ ~~~tYt~~.~
2 ~
Z ~ (~L~~Yi~ ~
v a
.i~ 88
SFSQUICENTENN~P~'
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
A l3tnuti~ul8[~innin~ BOB ,JOHNSON. CHAIRMAN
HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
LEE GARRETT. VICE•CHAIRMAN
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR 19 8 7 WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
ELMER C. HODGE December 21, ALAN H. BRITTLE
CAVE SPRING tAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
STEVEN A. MCGRAW
CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
HARRY C. NICKENS
VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
Mr. Donald R. Witt
3332 Kenwick Trail
Roanoke, Virginia 24018
Dear Mr. Witt:
The Board of Supervisors have asked me to express on
their behalf their sincere appreciation for your previous service
to the Roanoke County Planning Commission. Citizens so ive of
responsive to the needs of their community and willing to g
themselves and their time are indeed all too scarce.
This is to advise that at their meeting held on Tuesday,
December 15, 1987, the Board of Supervisors voted unanimously to
reappoint you as a member of Roanoke County Planning Commission
for a 4-year term. Your term will expire on December 31, 1991.
State law provides that any person elected, re-elected,
appointed to any body be furnished a copy of the Freedom of
Information Act; your copy is enclosed. We are also sending you
a copy of the Conflicts of Interest Act.
On behalf of the Supervisors and the cit~eciatoionRforoke
County, please accept our sincere thanks and app
your willingness to accept this appointment.
Very truly yours,
~9' .
Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
MHA/bjh
Enclosures
cc: Rob Stalzer
P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 2 4018-07 98 (7031 772-2004
STATE OF ROANOKE COUNTY
By Bob L. Johnson, Chairman
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
The Board of Supervisors began this year with a
commitment to regional cooperation and long-range planning and
development. Given the events of the past few weeks and the
accomplishments of the past eleven months, it would seem that we
have made major strides toward those goals.
We have this year witnessed a fully operational
Regional Airport Commission. We have also participated in the
ground breaking ceremonies for our new airport terminal building.
Currently, we enjoy regional support for projects such as
Explore, Spring Hollow Reservoir, and the search for a long-range
solution to our landfill needs. Our regional support for a
valley-wide legislative agenda was absolutely critical. If we
are to enjoy any success in Richmond, it must be in concert with
all of the valley governments.
1987 was punctuated with many firsts for Roanoke
County.
• • • • We settled out of court a citizen initiated annexation
petition with the City of Salem.
• • • • We agreed to test pilot the first source separation
recycling project in the history of the Commonwealth of Virginia.
• • • • Another first for the Commonwealth of Virginia also was
realized when Roanoke and Botetourt Counties jointly agreed to
operate a public library. The building, now nearing completion,
is located in the Bonsack area.
• • • • With the support of our School Board, we were able to
open our first public safety building. For the first time in
many years, our employees in the Sheriff's Department, Fire &
Emergency Services, and Data Processing have the necessary office
space to do their jobs. They can also park their cars without
fear of being ticketed.
"• • • • We have entered for the first time a private/public
sector venture to operate a park and equestrian center at Green
Hill in West Roanoke County.
• • • • In October of this year, we brought on line our E9-1-1
System. Quite possibly, our single most important advancement.
2
• • • • We were able to fashion this year our first major
drainage improvements program with our newly developed $200,000
drainage account.
Our capital improvements efforts extend across the
board from libraries and parks to schools. Major projects
included the headquarters library on 419, completion of a major
portion of our Kessler Mill Center, Green Hill Park, Pinkard
Court Center, as well as additions at Mason Cove Elementary
School, Northside High School, Glenvar Elementary and High
School, Cave Spring Elementary and High School, and an 8.9
million dollar junior high school in Vinton.
Our efforts to sustain these needed improvements was
supported by our economic development activities. Our goal of
75/25 received a major boost with the announcement of
Valleypointe, our proposed 200 million dollar development in
North County. Coupled with recent projects, such as Colonade
Park and the Southwest Industrial Park, we have truly turned the
corner toward our goal of a more equitable distribution of our
tax base. The financial integrity of Roanoke County has also
been sustained as will be evidenced by our final audit figures to
be released today. In short, it was a very good year.
However, the road to progress is often times paved with
controversy. This year is no different. Several of our major
projects have been subjected to much public debate. This is as
3
it should be. Constructive criticism is not only welcomed, it is
encouraged. Our deliberations and discussions have been
strengthened because of this process.
Our agenda for next year is already filling up. Our
Sesquicentennial activities, the celebration of our 150th
birthday, recodification of our zoning ordinance, the Spring
Hollow permitting process and the ramifications of school funding
changes recommended by JLARC will no doubt move center stage next
month.
As for 1987, we can without reservation declare it an
eventful year. For those of you who shared in this process - you
have our heartfelt gratitude. If the essence of this board could
be captured in words, it was done some 200 years ago in 1787 by
our own Thomas Jefferson when Mr. Jefferson stated, "We are
always equal to what we undertake with resolution." This
statement certainly characterizes both your attitude and your
work ethic. While there is much left to do, you can certainly
take great pride in a job well done.
I would like to take this opportunity, on behalf of the
Board of Supervisors, to wish all of the citizens of this valley
a peaceful holiday season and a healthy and happy New Year.
4
- ~'
ITEM NUMBER '~
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
IN ROANOKE, VA., ON TUESDAY,
MEETING DATE: December 15, 1987
SUBJECT: Resolution of Appreciation to the Contributors to the
Hollins Community Development Project
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
In the spring of 1985, grants and loans were approved by the
Virginia Water Project, Inc., the Farmers' Home Administration,
the Virginia Department of Transportation, and the Virginia
Department of Housing and Community for the installation of water
and sewer lines, road improvements, and housing rehabilitation in
the Hollins Community Development area.
Forty-two houses have been rehabilitated to HUD Section 8 Quality
Standards. Sewer and water installation and road construction
are scheduled to begin in January 1988. The projected completion
date is February 1989.
In addition to the grants and loans, many individuals and
organizations have contributed goods and services towards the
project. In order to express our gratitude, resolutions of
appreciation are attached. The contributors and their donations
are:
1. William L.K. Churchill, President, Churchill's
Ten portable toilets have been loaned at no charge since
July 1986 to residents having no bathroom facilities or
unsafe pit privies. Value of service is $12,960.
2. C. John Renick and John T. Boitnott, Attorneys
Title search was completed for right-of-way acquisitions
needed for road improvements. Value of contributed
service was $6,000.
3. Jack Peay, Appraiser
Appraisal services were completed for right-of-way and
easement acquisition. Value of contributed service was
$2,700.
~-i
4. Warner Dalhouse, President, Dominion Bankshares
A public information sign, valued at $600.00 was
installed in the community.
5. Green Thumb, a Senior Citizen Employment Service
Federally funded through Title V
A community improvement aide was employed to remove
debris from roadways throughout the community for 15
months. The value of the service was approximately
$5,000.
6. Moore's Building Supplies
Supplies valued at $150 were contributed for use by
Green Thumb worker.
7. Arthur G. Trout, Consultant
Housing consultant services, procurement selection
committee-two years of service.
8. City of Roanoke
Right-of-way properties were donated for road
improvements and easements for the main water and sewer
lines.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of formal expression of appreciation.
SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED:
~,c,~U
Sue Palmer, Coordinator Elmer C. Hodge, Jr.
Hollins Community Development County Administrator
------------------------------------------------------------------
ACTION VOTE
Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs
Denied ( )
Received ( )
Referred
To
Brittle
Garrett
Johnson
McGraw
Nickens
Attachment
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, DECEMBER 15,1987
RESOLUTION EXPRESSING THE ~ •,./
APPRECIATION OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD
OF SUPERVISORS TO CONTRIBUTORS OF THE
HOLLINS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROJECT
WHEREAS, in the spring of 1985, monies in the form of
grants, loans, and revenue sharing funds were allocated by Virginia
Water Project, Inc., Farmers' Home Administration, Virginia
Department of Transportation, Virginia Department of Housing and
Community Development, and the counties of Roanoke and Botetourt to
fund the installation of water and sewer lines, road improvements,
and housing rehabilitation in the Hollins community; and
WHEREAS, since the approval of the funds, many steps have
been taken to improve the quality of life in the Hollins community;
and
WHEREAS, many individuals and organizations have gener-
ously donated goods and services and in doing so, have greatly
improved health and safety conditions and the appearance of the
community; and
WHEREAS, this act of generosity and support is one that
meaningfully expresses sensitivity to the needs of the citizens and
further demonstrates an admirable sense of civic responsibility.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that on behalf of the
counties of Botetourt and Roanoke, the Roanoke County Board of Super-
visors wishes to express its gratitude for the services provided by
these individuals and organizations for the future improvement of
the Hollins community.
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, DECEMBER 15,1987
RESOLUTION 121587-1 EXPRESSING THE
APPRECIATION OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD
OF SUPERVISORS TO CONTRIBUTORS OF THE
HOLLINS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROJECT
WHEREAS, in the spring of 1985, monies in the form of
grants, loans, and revenue sharing funds were allocated by Virginia
Water Project, Inc., Farmers' Home Administration, Virginia
Department of Transportation, Virginia Department of Housing and
Community Development, and the counties of Roanoke and Botetourt to
fund the installation of water and sewer lines, road improvements,
and housing rehabilitation in the Hollins community; and
WHEREAS, since the approval of the funds, many steps have
been taken to improve the quality of life in the Hollins community;
and
WHEREAS, many individuals and organizations have gener-
ously donated goods and services and in doing so, have greatly
improved health and safety conditions and the appearance of the
community; and
WHEREAS, this act of generosity and support is one that
meaningfully expresses sensitivity to the needs of the citizens and
further demonstrates an admirable sense of civic responsibility.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that on behalf of the
counties of Botetourt and Roanoke, the Roanoke County Board of Super-
visors wishes to express its gratitude for the services provided by
these individuals and organizations for the future improvement of
the Hollins community.
On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor
Nickens, and upon the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson
NAYS: None
A COPY - TESTE:
.~V
Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
12/18/87
cc: File
Timothy Gubala, Assistant County Administrator
Sue Palmer, Department of Development
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, DECEMBER 15, 1987
RESOLUTION 121587-2 OF APPRECIATION TO
THOMAS M. BLAYLOCK FOR HIS
SERVICE AS COMMONWEALTH'S ATTORNEY
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
WHEREAS, Thomas M. Blaylock has been employed by
Roanoke County since 1978; was appointed as Commonwealth's
Attorney in September 1981; and was successfully elected to that
position in a special election in 1982 and reelected in 1984; and
WHEREAS, during his tenure in office, Mr. Blaylock
was active in the Virginia Association of Commonwealth's
Attorneys, serving on the Board of Governors; the National
District Attorneys Association; the Virginia Trial Lawyers
Association; the American Trial Lawyers Association; the Virginia
Network for Victims and Witnesses; and was selected the
Outstanding Young Citizen for 1986 by the Cave Spring Jay Cee's.
WHEREAS, Mr. Blaylock did at all times act with
distinction, exhibiting his outstanding ability to serve the best
interest of all the citizens of Roanoke County.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of
Supervisors of Roanoke County does express its deepest
appreciation and the appreciation of the citizens of Roanoke
County to Thomas M. Blaylock for his years of capable, loyal and
dedicated service to Roanoke County; and
FURTHER, the Board of Supervisors does express its best
wishes for continued success in all his future endeavors.
On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor
McGraw, and upon the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson
NAYS: None
A COPY - TESTE:
Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
12/18/87
cc: File
Resolution of Appreciation File
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, DECEMBER 15, 1987
RESOLUTION 121587-3 OF APPRECIATION TO
SHERIFF 0. S. FOSTER UPON HIS RETIREMENT
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
WHEREAS, Sheriff Foster has served a total of 34 years
and 8 months in police service, 31 years and 6 months of this
service in the Roanoke Valley; and
WHEREAS, Sheriff 0. S. Foster was first elected Sheriff
of Roanoke County in 1967, and was reelected in 1971, 1975, 1979
and 1983, making him the first sheriff to be elected to a fifth
term in the history of Roanoke County; and
WHEREAS, Sheriff Foster has held leadership positions
in numerous law enforcement organizations including the Virginia
Sheriff's Association, the National Sheriff's Association, the
American Law Enforcement Association, the Roanoke County
Transportation Safety Commission, and the Roanoke Valley Law
Enforcement Council; and
WHEREAS, during his tenure, he has received many honors
and awards for his involvement in law enforcement and his
volunteer efforts; and
WHEREAS, because of Sheriff Foster's leadership skills,
the Roanoke County Sheriff's Department has gained recognition as
one of the most modern and effective departments in the
Commonwealth of Virginia.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of
Supervisors of Roanoke County expresses its deepest appreciation
and the appreciation of the citizens of Roanoke County to Sheriff
0. S. Foster for his many years of capable, loyal and dedicated
service to Roanoke County; and
FURTHER, the Board of Supervisors does express its best
wishes for a happy, restful and productive retirement.
On motion of Supervisor Brittle, seconded by Supervisor
Garrett, and upon the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson
NAYS: None
A COPY - TESTE:
Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
12/18/87
cc: File
Resolution of Appreciation File
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, DECEMBER 15, 1987
RESOLUTION 121587-4 OF APPRECIATION TO ALAN H. BRITTLE
FOR HIS SERVICE AS A MEMBER OF THE ROANOKE
COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
WHEREAS, Alan H. Brittle was first elected to the
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors from the Cave Spring
Magisterial District in 1983; and
WHEREAS, Supervisor Brittle served the County of
Roanoke tirelessly and selflessly for a period of four years,
devoting many hours to the business of Roanoke County, both as a
member of the Board and as Chairman of the Roanoke County Board
of Supervisors for 1986, and in all capacities, Supervisor
Brittle served capably the citizens of the County.
WHEREAS, during his term, Supervisor Brittle also
served with distinction on the Fifth Planning District Commission
Executive Board, Clean Valley Committee, and the Local Government
Advisory Council.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of
Supervisors of Roanoke County does express its deepest
appreciation and the appreciation of the citizens of Roanoke
County to Alan H. Brittle for his years of capable, loyal and
dedicated service to Roanoke County; and
FURTHER, the Board of Supervisors does express its
best wishes for continued success in all his future endeavors.
On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor
Nickens, and upon the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson
NAYS: None
A COPY - TESTS:
~n-GZ.~L~c~,
Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
12/18/87
cc: File '
Resolutions of Appreciation File
A-121587-5
ITEM NUMBER ~ /
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
IN ROANOKE, VA., ON TUESDAY,
MEETING DATE: December 15, 1987
SUBJECT: Presentation of the Audit for the Fiscal Year Ended
June 30, 1987
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
This space on the agenda is reserved for the presentation of
the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the County of
Roanoke for the year ended June 30, 1987. The Audit Committee
will review this report at 2:00 p.m. on December 15, 1987 prior
to its distribution to the Board of Supervisors. When the finan-
cial reports are distributed at the Board meeting, there will be
a report on the financial condition of the County presented by
Diane D. Hyatt, Director of Finance; and Reta Busher, Director of
Management and Budget.
FISCAL IMPACT:
RECOMMENDATION:
SUBMITTED BY:
Diane D. Hyatt d-~
Director of Finance
APPROVED:
7
Elmer C. od
County Administrator
------------- --------------------------------
ACTION --------- ------------
VOTE
Approved (x) Motion by: Bob L. Johnson/Lee No Yes Abs
Denied ( ) Garrett to accept audit report Brittle x
Received ( ) and appropriate $1,052,806 Garrett x
Referred to fund balance Johnson x
To McGraw x
Nickens x
cc: File
Reta Busher
Diane Hyatt
-~ _ ~ ~
pPti SE'i~~i'ATIOt`i OF C'C,.ME'Rr.iiSNSIVE ~i~iNtT?1G FINANCIr~L REPORT
FOR THE `~F~ ~R ~-"~D~f~ ~ ~~J`i 4: 30 , 1987
AND ACCOMPADIYI~;G FINAi~1CIAL ANAL~'SIS
PRESIIVrATION OF CCMPR~IENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPOF2I'
FVR 7'N~E YEAR ETID JUI~TF' 30, 1987
AND ACCCMPANYII~ FINANCIAL ANALYSIS
Page
Letter to Board of Supervisors 2
Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in 6
Financial Reporting
List of Virginia Cities and Counties Awarded
the Certificate of Excellence
Comparison of_ Per Capita Expenditures Between 8
Selected Localities
Comparison of Valley Governments Debt Ratios 9
Comparison of Revenues - Budget to Actual 1.0
Actual Revenues - All Funds (Graph) 11
Comparison of Expenditures - Budget to Actua_1 12
Actual Expenditures - A~_1 Funds (Graph) 13
Undesignated Fund Balances 14
Contingencies Based on County Commitments 15
List of Recent County Accomplishments 16
Comparison of Valley Governments Current State 18
and Local Tax Rates
-1-
o~ PoaNp,~~
>~ ~ t. P
`
~~ t~~
.
~~~
~ .~ ~A
NSF
.
.
.
v
a . a
' _.
'
'
1838 ~~Ea°,
1
988
~__-~~:
ESQUICEN i cNN`
~I B,ni,ni:,l6cgi,,:,:,«; BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
BOB .JOHNSON. CHAIRMAN
HOLLINS h1AGIST-RIAL DISTRICT
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR LEE GARRETT. VICE CHAIRMAN
HODGE_
ELMER C YVIN DSGR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
. ALAN H. BRITTLE
CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
STEVEN A. MCGRAW
Decembe r 15 19 8 7 ~ATAW~A MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
~ HARRY C. NICKENS
VIN TON MAGIS ERIAL D:STRIC i
Board of Supervisors
County of Roanoke
The audit firm of Peat, Marwick, Main & Co., recently
completed the annual audit for the year ending June 30, 1987 and
we would like to present to you the completed Comprehensive
Annual Financial Report (CAFR) The auditors issued an
unqualified opinion and once again, the County earned the
Government Finance Officers Association Certificate of
Achievement f.or Excellence in Financial Reporting. Also, at this
time, the staff_ would like to provide you with an analysis of
the current financial position of the County, and a summary of
the cost of services in the County as compared to other Virginia
localities.
In making this analysis, staff compared the actual cost of
oper_ati_ons to projections made more than a year ago, as well as
comparing expenditures in Roanoke County to those of the City of
Lynchburg, City of Roanoke, City of Salem, and the County of
Albemarle for the year ended June 30, 1986. These localities were
selected because they are in western Virginia, provide similar
levels of urbanized services to their citizens, and have a
comparable population ratio. The cost data was taken from the
state Comparative Report of Local Government Revenues and
--- --
Ex~enditures for the Year Ended June 30, 1986. This report is
based on standard information submitted by all localities in the
State of Virginia.
This analysis is quite a complimentary report card for the
County. In virtually all major comparisons, Roanoke County
provides higher quality services at lower costs than other
governments of relative size. Of particular interest is the
comparison of the per capita cost in the areas of general and
financial administration, law enforcement, public safety and
parks and recreation. In each of these categories Roanoke County
compares favorably. The Board of Supervisors has identified
education as a priority item and we feel this is reflected
-2-
P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 (703> 772-2004
clearly in the local share of education expenses on a per capita
basis.
As stated previously, Roanoke County received the
Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Repo r.t_ing
which was earned for the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report
for the Year Ended June 30, 1986. This is the third time that
the County has received this recognition. During 1986, this
award was earned by only 28 of the 125 counties and cities in the
State of Virginia. We are extremely proud of this award because
it shows that the County has made a commitment to professionalism
in i.ts financial reporting and is concerned that all citizens and
other interested individuals should have a complete and concise
financial picture of the County. This award shows that the
County has complied with all generally accepted accounting
principles and has presented this information in a readable
format. We plan to again submit our Comprehensive Annual
Financial Report for the year ended June 30, 1987 for
consideration of this award.
In the June 30, 1987 audit report the County has several
areas of which to be proud. The Treasurer's collection ratio for
taxes is the greatest it has ever been at 106.09 percent. (This
is shown on Table 3, page 78 of the CAFR.) This large increase
is due in part to the settlement arrived at with Friendship Manor
and Richfield and the exoneration of their older taxes which were
being carried on the County's books.
The County continues to maintain an excellent ratio of net
bonded debt to assessed value. For 1987, this ratio was only .99
percent. (This is shown on Table 7, Page 81 of the CAFR.) This
compares to a ratio of 2.1]_ for Roanoke City and 1.79 for the
City of Salem. This debt per capita ratio for Roanoke County
however, does not include the $16,000,000 general obligation
bonds for the reservoir and water improvements which were
approved in the November, 1986 referendum, but have yet to be
sold.
For the 1986-87 fiscal year, the County did an excellent job
of projecting revenues. Although variances occurred in specific
revenue items, the total General Fund revenues of the County
were within 1 percent of the budgeted amount. This degree of
accuracy is indicative of the efforts of the County staff
to project these items realistically and professiona]_ly.
Included in these projections were the revenues from proration of
personal property taxes which the County put into effect January
1, 1987. An analysis of County revenues for the year shows that
37.9 percent of County monies come from the State of Virginia.
The majority of this money is specifically designated for
education. Real estate taxes account for 29.3 percent of County
revenues and personal property accounts for 11.5 percent. 'T'hese
are the two areas where the County has the most flex.ibil.ity in
setting rates that would generate significant income. Our
revenues from the Federal Government have decreased to only 3.7
-3-
percent. The majority of this money was specifically designated
for the Hollins Community Development Project.
In an effort to contain costs and add to fund balance, the
County departments made a deliberate effort to reduce
expenditures during the past fiscal year. An analysis of the
actual expenditures of the County indicate that 60.2 percent of
all County expenditures went toward education. By comparing this
to the 37.9 percent of the revenues received from the
Commonwealth, you can clearly see the general tax dollars
required from the County to make up the difference.
Capital outlay for the year am
represents expenditures related to
million referendum approved in
improvements.) Public safety for
police and fire protection, amounts
budget; while general government
percent of the total budget.
Bunted to 11.1 percent. This
the 1986 bond issue ($15.0
1985 for various public
the County, which includes
to 8.8 percent of the County
administration is only 4.8
Largely due to cost savings of County departments, the
County has an additional $1,052,806 to add to fund balance fr.orn
the 1986-87 operations. By returning this amount to the
undesignated fund balance, the County showed an undesignated fund
balance at June 30, 1987 of $2,063,493.
Since June 30, 1987, the undesignated fund balance of the
General Fund has been reduced to $1,682,119, which is still
slightly over 3 percent of the General Fund. In addition, a
Capital Fund reserve has been established for future capital
expenditures as a result of the County Charter restriction on the
use of proceeds from the sale of capital. Currently, there is
$139,407 in this reserve. It is also important to bear in mind
that there are several contingencies based on County commitments
that will need funding sometime in the near future.
One of these commitments is the Valleypoint Project. At
this time, monies have not been set aside for land acquisition
which is estimated at $260,000 nor for any of the other
contingent items of the project which have been estimated at
$546,000. The County staff is currently negotiating the
financing of these obligations and will bring the various
a]_ternatives back to the Board of Supervisors sometime in the
near future.
The County has also made a commitment for the environmental
improvement at Dixie Caverns Landfill. Cost estimates have not
yet been f.ina]_ized, but are expected to be somewhere between
$100,000-$300,000.
Finally, staff continues to encourage the Board
of Supervisors to improve its fund balance position to ensure
financial stability. In the past, rating agencies have looked
for a fund balance of 3-5 percent. Now they are beginning to
-4-
suggest a 10 percent reserve to cover the following: 1) to cover
contingencies which could not reasonably be anticipated during
the budget process, 2) to provide the operating cash necessary to
meet day-to-day operations in instances when the tax collection
patterns do not necessarily correspond with the spending patterns
of the municipality, 3) to recognize the reduced investment
income potentials which resulted from the Tax Reform Act of 1986,
and, 4) to provide the resources to assume large deductibles and
additional risks as a result of tightening of the insurance
marketplace.
We know that the 1988-89 fiscal year budget is likely to be
one of the most challenging budgets that the Board of Supervisors
has yet considered. However, we know that the County is going
into the process in a stable financial condition, and with the
assistance of knowledgeable and professional staff and a Board
concerned about the welfare of its County's citizens, we will
continue to provide the quality services the citizens of Roanoke
County have come to expect.
We are available at any time to answer any questions you play
have about this information.
~~{~ ~''
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
ohn M. Chambiiss, J .
Assistant Countv Administrator
Diane D. Hyatt, A
Dipre~c-t-or of Finance
Reta R. Busher, CPA
Director of Manag~nent and Budget
-5-
-h-
VIRGINIA CITIES AND COUNTIES
AWARDED THE CERTIFICA'T`E OF EXCELLENCE IN FINANCIAL REPORTI\~G
FOR 'I'rIE 'YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 1986
Cities
Alexandria
Charlottesville
Chesapeake
Colonial Heights
Danville
Fairfax
Fredericksburg
Hampton
Manassas
Manassas Park
Newport News
Norfolk
Portsmouth
Richmond
Roanoke
Staunton
Suffolk
Virginia Beach
Counties
Chesterfield County
Fairfax County
Hanover County
Henrico County
James City County
Loudoun County
Prince William County
Roanoke County
Rockingham County
Stafford County
-7-
COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA
COMPARISON OF PER CAPITA EXPENDITURES BETWEEN SELECTED LOCALITIES
AS OF JUNE 30, 1986
COUNTY OF CITY OF CITY OF CITY OF COUNTY OF
EXPENDITURE CLASS ROANOKE LYNCHBURG ROANOKE SALEM ALBERMARLE
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
POPULATION
GENERAL GOVERNMENT
ADMINISTRATION
JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION
PUBLIC SAFETY
LAW ENFORCEMENT
FIRE AND RESCUE
CORRECTION-DETENTION
OTHER PROTECTION
PUBLIC WORKS
MAINTENANCE-HIGHWAYS
SANITATION-WASTE REM.
BUILDINGS & GROUNDS
HEALTH AND WELFARE
PARKS, REC. & CULTURAL
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
EDUCATION
NONDEPARTMRNTAL
TOTAL
73,700 68,000 101,200 23,900 60,200
--------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------
40.98 40.21 61.11 89.77 41.02
16.79 15.32 21.73 21.29 14.65
--------------------------------------------------
38.81 92.97 76.78 83.11 30.24
27.96 77.07 73.07 58.20 9.87
15.85 26.71 8.69 3.29 6.89
4,.45 5.48 10.77 17.77 11.62
--------------------------------------------------
87.07 202.23 169.31 162.37 58.62
--------------------------------------------------
0.00 59.09 66.94 67.26 4.20
24.26 27.19 51.96 45.32 9.68
23.57 20.30 59.66 22.28 10.49
--------------------------------------------------
47.93 106.58 178.56 134.86 24.37
--------------------------------------------------
36.21 68.14 89.78 16.75 34.17
--------------------------------------------------
25.38 46.60 27.44 58.00 23.84
---------------------------------------------------
9.70 20.57 6.83 11.39 52.71
--------------------------------------------------
711.03 511.12 499.12 521.19 550.48
--------------------------------------------------
4.39 0.44 1.46 O.DO 0.00
--------------------------------------------------
979.48 1,011.21 1,055.34 1,015.62 799.86
--------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------
SOURCE: COMPARATIVE REPORT OF-LOCAL GOVERNMENT REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES
-8-
COMPARISONS OF VALLEY GOVIu2NMENTS DEBT RATIOS
AS OF JUNE 30, 1987
County of City of City of
Roanokea Roanoke r 1e~~:~
Ratio of Net Bonded
Debt to Assessed Value .99 2.11 1.79
Net Bonded Debt
~,~~_~~
Per Capita $326 $486 ~'''"~
Bond Rating AA AA ~'~
aDoes Not Include 1986 Roanoke County Reservoir Bonds
-9-
COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA
COMPARISON OF REVENUES - BUDGET TO ACTUAL
FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 1987
GED]ERAL FUND
GENERAL PROPERTY TAXES
OTHER LOCAL TAXES
PERMITS, PRIVILEGE FEES
AND REGULATORY LICENSES
FINES AND FORFEITURES
REVENUES FROM USE OF
MONEY AND PROPERTY
CHARGES FOR SERVICES
MISCELLANEOUS
RECOVERED COSTS
FROM THE COMMONWEALTH
FROM THF_ FEDERAL GOVERNMENT
TOTAL GENERAL FUND
VARIANCF.
FAVORABLE
BUDGET ACTUAL (UNFAVORABLE)
32,378,000 33,441,685 1,063,685
9,545,220 9,209,487 (335,733)
376,400 402,194 25,794
125,000 175,562 50,562
1,058,673 723,643 (335,030)
194,000 228,090 34,090
277,000 298,817 21,817
489,796 284,019 (205,777)
5,506,913 5,601,234 94,321
1,264,064
--- 1,342,102
------------ 78,038
-------------
---------
51,215,066 51,706,833 491,767
NOTE: ACTUAL REVENUES tdERE 0.96 HIGHER THAN BUDGETED REVENUES.
SOURCE: COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT, COUNTY OF ROANOKE,
VIRGINIA, YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 1987.
-10-
.-.
b~
~.
~ ~~
~ ~
T
~~ T
^
V 1 ~~
W ~
Q O
n~
11
W
~_
~
'
V 1
W in
~J~~
LJ
_~
J r`
~ ~
~,~
r
W ~
~ W
~_
W
Q- b`~
J t`~
~ P'']
~~
(> 1-
~~
L
d
W
U ~
W
~~
J ~
(.) ll7
~
~u
~ ] `'~ ct7
W
I- ~
(Il y=
i~ c~J
~
O W
LY
O
~ t!7
J
d
~ Z
w
w ~
~ ~
w
v E--
c~
Z
~~
U
W
s
~--
-11-
COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA
COMPARISON OF EXPENDITURES - BUDGET TO ACTUAL
FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 1987
GENERAL FUND:
GENERAL GOVERNMENT
ADMINISTRATION
JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION
PUBLIC SAFETY
PUBLIC WORKS.
HEALTH AND 4dELFARE
PARKS, RECREATION AND
CULTURAL
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
NONDEPARTMENTAL
DEBT SERVICE
COUNTY DEPARTMENTAL SAVINGS
CONTINGENCY BALANCE
TOTAL GENERAL FUND
VARIANCE
FAVORABLE
BUDGET
------------- ACTUAL
----------- (UNFAVORABLE)
-------------
3,679,007 3,574,066 104,941
885,389 763,497 121,892
8,0•I2,967 7,963,374 79,593
3,530,801 3,151,338 379,463
3,774,856 3,235,094 539,762
0
2,280,068 2,102,582 177,486
789,381 741,643 47,738
1,336,832 986,081 350,751
2,511,557 2,408,817 102,740
26,830,858 24,926,492 1,904,366
------------------------------------
1,196,585 0 1,196,585
-------------------------------------
28,027,443 24,926,492 3,100,951
SOURCE: COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT, COUNTY OF ROANOKE,
VIRGINIA, YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 1987.
-12-
p~p~
O\
/~ ~,
V ~ -c}
~~
% 7
~_
_~ ~
` Q
~ w
~ ~
L~.J w
.v;
~ ~
~ ~_
C~ w
!~ a- ~o
[.L' w iri
J
~~
~ ~w
C ~~
~~
w
~_ ~
~' W
cD
w
~ ~
d
r7 ~
L J
'
^
V
1 Z
/
1 NN
LL
*
9~
~ _ J
i T
~ r cu o°
J
es ~~
_I
~ ~
C~i
~
F
-
~ !-
~ Z
W J
~
2 ~ ~
~- J J
W W l_7
~ ~ ~
~
~ Y
~
ci.
*yQ
4c•1
c;
~,
l._~i
C~
~~
L~J
-13-
COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA
UNDESIGNATED FUND BALANCES
Amount
Undesignated Fund Balance at June 30, 1986 $1,584 637
Undesignated Fund Balance at June 30, 1987
Undesignated Fund Balance at December 1, 1987
Capital Reserve at December 1, 1987
aCounty objective is a minimum of 3$ to 50
(5g of General Fund = $2,662,926)
$2,063,493
$1,682,119a
$ 139,407
Percent of
General Fund
3.16
3.87
3.16$
_ 0.26
-14-
COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA
CONrINGII~CIES BASED ON COLJNI'Y CCM~LITMQ~TI'S
AS OF DECEMBER 15, 1987
1. Valleypointe
Land Acquisition $260,000
Contingencya 546,000
2. Dixie Caverns Landfill $100,000-$300,000
aThe County is currently negotiating the financing of this contingency,
and $198,000 has already been appropriated for road construction.
-15-
COUN-'I`Y OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA
RF1~ ACCOMPLISHMII~1`I'S
In an urbanizing locality such as Roanoke County, there are a multitude
of needs for service which must be evaluated and addressed by the Board of
Supervisors and County Administration as they attempt to be good stewards of
the financial resources entrusted to them. Outlined below is a listing of
several of the more recent accomplishments and issues which have faced this
Board of Supervisors.
SERVICE TO THE RESIDENTS OF ROANOKE COUNTY
CORTRAN
There are many areas within the Roanoke Valley where public mass
transportation is not readily available to meet the service needs of our
citizens. In 1987-88, the Board appropriated $60,000 to continue Roanoke
County's in~~olvement in the COR'I'RAN program. CORTRAN works in conjunction
with the Valley Metro system and RADAR to provide affordable transportation to
the elderly and handicapped citizens of Roanoke County.
Drainage
In the past several years, the Roanoke Valley has incurred millions of
dollars worth of property damage as a result of f loociing and poor drainage.
Beginning in 1986-87, the Board of Supervisors included $175,000 in the budget
to begin addressing these drainage needs for the residents of Roanoke County.
Funds were also included in the 1987-88 budget in the amount of $200,000 to
continue these efforts. In recent weeks, County staff has met with citizens
in the various areas of the County to inventory the drainage needs, estimate
the amount of repairs necessary to improve this situation, and to prioritize
the projects by identifying which ones can be accomplished utilizing County
resources and which should be corrected using external sources such as the
Department of Transportation and the Corps of Engineers.
Trash Collection
In October, 1985, the Board of Supervisors removed the $5 per month
residential trash collection fee and began providing free trash collection to
the residents of Roanoke County. Staff has continued to work in this area to
find more cost-effective means of providing this service and will, during the
current fiscal year, implement a new program using a ene-arm mechanical truck.
The County is also working with the Clean Valley Conxnittee in a pilot project
concerning the source separation of trash to be considered for recycling.
Each of these programs has been instituted with efficiency in mind to minimize
the cost to the taxpayers of Roanoke County.
Bond Projects
The voters of Roanoke County approved a $15.0 million bond referendum in
November, 1985 for numerous public improvements, including the construction
and renovation of fire stations, park facilities, emergency cemnunications,
improvements to public buildings, and the construction of the William Byrd
Junior High School. These bonds were issued in May, 1986, and much of the
construction has been completed. Future years' budgets will need to address
-16-
.the additional personnel, capital, and maintenance costs associated with these
various facilities.
REGIONAL EFFORTS
911
In October, 1987, the County of Roanoke, City of Roanoke, City of Salem,
and Town of Vinton began utilizing the 911 emergency telephone system for the
prompt reporting and response in emergency situations. The conversion to this
program has been quite successful, and it has been well received by the
community.
Airport Participation
In June, 1987, the City of Roanoke and County of Roanoke form.~d t~.e new
Airport Commission to oversee the operation of the Regional Airport and to
work towards the completion of the expanded terminal facilities. The County
of Roanoke has already made its first $200,000 contribution towards this
effort and will continue to participate in the future.
Botetourt-Roanoke County Joint Library Facility
The Counties of Botetourt and Roanoke have jointly shared in the
construction of a new library facility on U. S. Route 460 east of Roanoke to
serve the residents in that area. It is anticipated that this new facility
will be in service in the spring of 1988. The Counties will also share in the
operational costs in the future.
Hollins Community Project
Botetourt County and Roanoke County are also sharing in the cost of a
community improvement project in the Hollins area which is upgrading the
standard of living for the residents in the project area. Improvements are
being made to roads and water and sewer services. The projects are being
funded by grant mx~nies in addition to the local effort.
Contributions to the Arts
In its effart to improve the quality of life in the Roanoke Valley, the
Board of Supervisors continues to contribute to the arts and sciences which
are provided on a regional basis. The availability of such activities as the
Symphony, Science Museum, Center in the Square, and other art appreciation
endeavors is an important growth factor to our current and future citizens.
ECONOMIC DEVELIJPMENT STRATEGY
The Board or Supervisors has identified a desire to improve the ratio of
commercial to residential properties in the County to a 25-75 percent ratio.
To accomplish this task, the County is assisting in the marketing of
industrial and commercial sites within the Southwest Industrial Park. The
County also participates in the Regional Partnership in its endeavor to market
Southwest Virginia as a viable home for new business and industry and is
working with the private developer towards the completion or the Valleypointe
project.
-17-
~~
~a
a~
~ ~~
z ~
O H
H ~
0
0
-x -x ~n o
08 0 0 0 ~~;
z
~
~
`h ~
~
Q
i H ~
~ ~
,,. o
Z
j..~ ~ ~
~ H a
~ ~
~
,~ ~
O ~
O dP dP N
v'~~
~ ~
W
z
0
~ o
-~~rd.G.~ v ~o
O O r-I N M ~7' lfl U} tIl
OOOOOtII U] O
(~ lD to ~' M N r-I 1, O
a O
dP o~ M
C_l lD lD t/}
0o O O I I
~ N N N z
~ ~ ~ a~ ~
z
Z
z°
0
o .aJ ~ ~ .c a,
m ~ ~ ~
H O O rINM~'
U
~/} {/} ~o do aAa oW dA
W 00000
w~n~rMN
CvJ
N mot' mot'
.-I M M
t/} t/} 1?
fn O
~ ~
~~~-III O 1-I
u1 ~ N
O O I i
o O o ~.n
8
~~~
W ~n O ~n
x S.a
(Q~, 7~-I
(L11L N N ri
v
Q ~ O O
o
r-{ M M
t/}~ t/} t/}~
~II
+~ a~
~~
~~ ~ ~
II~ ~a~
a ~ ~
cd O CY,
+J •.~ O
~
~ ~
~
tl~ .C2
~ ~
.~, ~ x \
~ ~
.~
O
\
L
f1 O
tn-
~ DC
~
o~
~~
o
da dP o
~OlO
}
t
W
~ Z
CY, 2
O o
00
O O
O O W O O
oozoo
O 00 O N O
~ ~
O
O O
O
O
M ~O
0 0 0 0 0
OOL['100
omr-I~oo
~ ~
O O
O O
N l0
O O O O O
oo~noo
LCl 00 lfl l~ L(1
r-1 r-I r-I
00
00
o~
N lD
1 I
0 0 0 0 0
O O t11 Ll1 O
L!'1 t.C) W l0 Ill
rl ri r-1
H ~ ~ ~
H ~
~
,
.~ .~ ~
~ ~ g ~ ~ ~~~~
x ~~~
~
`~ H ~~ro~
~ a o
~ a
W C ~ .~ ~ d
~
m O O ~ c
N
a }
~
~ ~ ~
~
i
~
~ U ~ ~
-{
c~S c
d
b~ p
E
E-~
U r.>r ~ W
~ ~ ~ U
P
.i
-18-
ITEM NUMBER C
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE•
December 15, 1987
SUBJECT: Presentation on the Sesquicentennial Activities
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The Sesquicentennial year is about to begin, and this is an
excellent time to update the board members on the activities and
plans for the year.
Executive Director Kathy Davis, Jean Glontz, Chairman of the
Sesquicentennial Committee and Stephen Musselwhite, Chairman of
the Sesquicentennial Committee, Inc. will be present at the
meeting. They will update the board on the status of the various
committees and the other special events planned to salute the
Roanoke County Sesquicentennial.
They will also present to the Board members a copy of the
Children's History Book of Roanoke County and another memento.
~w
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
ACTION VOTE
Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs
Denied ( ) Brittle
Received ( ) Garrett
Referred Johnson
To McGraw
Nickens
~~
A-121587-6
ITEM NUMBER ~`-~
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: December 15, 1987
SUBJECT: Approval to amend the 1987 holiday schedule
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
On March 24, 1987 the Board of Supervisors established the 1987
holiday schedule. At that time the Board also authorized the
closing of county offices on any day appointed by the Board of
Supervisors or the Governor of Virginia as a legal holiday or for
state or county offices to close.
The Department of Personnel and Training to all state agency
heads has authorized the following additional days off for state
employees in the Executive Branch:
Thursday, December 24 - 12 noon
Thursday, December 31 - 12 noon
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the Board authorize the two additional
half-day holidays as listed above in accordance with the decision
they made on March 24th to honor in Roanoke County any closings
or legal holidays designated by the state.
,~fi~~/
Elmer C. odg
County Administrator
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
ACTION VOTE
Approved (x) Motion by: Alan H. Brittle/Steven A. No Yes Abs
Denied ( ) McGraw to approve staff Brittle x
Received ( ) rPC~mmPnr3ation Garrett _~
Referred Johnson x
To McGraw x
_~
Nickens
cc: File
County Dept. Heads
,~' _ `~ V
t
~O~~J ~~~
~~'~•'
~~
~~~ ~~Y ~
OHDNG ~~p~ 6 g L9~'
DIRECTOR
~-
.~ v
~~
I
C~~M®NW~AI,'I'H of Vg~~~NgA
Department of rersonnel and Traanang
November 17, 1987
MEMORANDUM
T0: All State Agency Heads
FROM: Chong M. Pak
SUBJECT: 1987 Yuletide Holiday Schedule
...
DAMES MONROE gU4D~NG
! pt N ! 4tn STREET
RICHMOND VIRGINIA 232!9
Igna~225~2'3'
State agencies will be closed Friday, December 25, in obser-
vance of Christmas and Friday, January 1, in observance of
New Year's Day. In addition, Governor Gerald L. Baliles has-
authorized the following days off for classified employees in
the Executive Branch:
Thursday, December 24 - 12 noon
. Thursday, Oecember 31 - 12 noon
For those employees on shift work, this represents excusing
employees from work for four hours (excluding lunch periods).
Necessary services throughout the Commonwealth will be main-
tained. Employees, other than those on alternate holiday
schedules, who are required to work on the days specified
above are eligible for compensatory leave.
Please take an opportunity, on behalf of the Governor, to
wish your employees a happy holiday season and extend his
thanks for their service to the Commonwealth.
cc: Governor Gerald L. Baliles
The Honorable Carolyn J. Moss
Agency Human Resources Officers
An Equal Opportunity Employer
' ~ July, 1987
- ~ $LECTED
Clerk of Circuit Court Elizabeth W. Stokes
~,~ Commissioner of [he Revenue R. Wayne Compton
~w~.:.s:
~, Commonwealth's Attorney Thomas M. Blaylock
N ~ ;
~"~
Sheriff
0. S. Foster
Treasurer Alfred C. Anderson
County Administrator Elmer C. Hodge
REPORT DIRECTLY TO COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
* Assistant County Administrator
of Community Development Timothy W. Gubala
Chief Building Official, Construction
Building Services Department James T. Nininger, Jr.
Director, Development Review
Department 0. Arnold Covey
Director, Planning, Zoning, and
Gran[a Department Robert A. Stelzer
* Assistant County Administrator
- of Management Services
' John M; Chambliss, Jr.
,.,(-.,
Director , (llst..~
D e p a r t m e n t ~~ j,~^4,~_-:-~~ ~M Y e-r' S
Director, Finance Department Diane D. Hyatt
Director, Management and Budge[
Department Re[a R. Busher
Director, Real Estate Assessment
Department John D. Willey
* Assistant County Administrator
of Public Facilities John R. Hubbard
Director, Engineering Department Phillip T. Henry
Director, General Services
Department Gardner W. Smith
Director, Parks and Recreation
Department Stephen H. Carpenter
Director, Utilities Department Clifford D. Craig
* Animal Control Department
Chief Animal Control Officer Kenneth L. Hogan
* Fire and Rescue Department
Chief Thomas C. Fuqua
* Human Resources Department
Director D. Keith Cook
* Procurement Department
Director Jack G. Council
* Youth Haven II
Program Manager Beverly T. Waldo
INDEPENDENT DEPARTMENT HEADS
County Attorney Paul M. Mahoney
General Registrar E. Elizabeth Leah
Health Department Director Margaret L. Hagan, M.D.
Library Director George D. Garretaon
School Superintendent Bayea E. Wilson
Social Services Department Director Betty M. Lucas
VPI 6 SU Extension Service Lowell M. Gobble
Item ~
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE
IN ROANOKE, VA., ON
MEETING DATE: December 15, 1987
OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
TUESDAY,
SUBJECT: Amendments to Restrictive Covenants for Mountain View
Farm Technological Park
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
~....~4.15ra..~/
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors rezoned approximately 32
acres in Ma rch 1983, on Hollins Road in order to develop an
industrial park. Subsequently, AMP, Inc. located on the site and
the County staff marketed the remaining 7.168 acres as an
industrial site. Restrictive covenants governing the use and
development of the County property were prepared and recorded in
May 1983.
During the negotiations for the sale of the County property to
Shimchock, it became apparent that there were discrepancies
between the recorded restrictive covenants and copies possessed
by the neighborhood citizens. In order to expedite the sale of
the property and respond to citizen concerns about the Mountain
View Farm property development, several proposed amendments to
the restrictive covenants have been prepared (see attachment).
FISCAL IMPACT:
None
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors authorize the
staff to amend the restrictive covenants and record these changes
with Roanoke County Circuit Court.
SUBMITTED BY:
~_ W
Timot y W. Gu ala
Assistant County Administrator
Community Development
APPROVED:
~u~/
Elmer C. Hod e
County Administrator
Approved ( )
Denied ( )
Received ( )
Referred
To
Motion by:
ACTION
Brittle
Garrett
Johnson
McGraw
Nickens
VOTE
No Yes Abs
Attachment
ITEM NUMBER _~~ ~ _
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRG:LNIA HELD AT TITS ROANOI.:I? COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
IN ROANOI{E, VA. , ON `PUESDAY,
MEETING DATE: December 15, 1987
SUBJECT: Request for a public hearing pursuant to Section 15.1-
29.14 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, autho-
rizing the imposition of fees for cross connection .in-
spections
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
~ ~ C:~C'ar~v l~+L v~,aJ L~~~fvlSLY~
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
State law requires each loca]_ity to have an active cross
connection device inspection program to protect and preveni~ the
contamination of public water systems from private, commercial
and industrial sources. Roanoke County began a cross connect_i.on
inspection program in 1977. During 1987, Construction Buiadi_ng
Services performed 639 cross connection inspections.
Currently no fees are imposed for the cross connection in-
Pur_suant to Section 15.1-29.1.4 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as
amended, the imposition of such fees shall be enacted by ordin-
ance following the public hearing.
FTSC'.AT, TMPACT:
Roanoke County would collect approximately $20,790 annually
~~
in additional revenue from cross connection inspections,
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the following:
1. That pursuant to Section 15.1-29.14, notice of t}ze pub-
]_ic hearing imposing a cross connection inspection fee will be
published in the Roanoke Times and World News on December 2?_ anc]
29.
2. That the first reading of the proposed ordinance be held
on January 12, 1988.
3. That the second reading and public hearing on the adop-
tion of said ordinance be held on January 26, 1988.
~ -/
Respectfully submitted,
~~,~~ ~ i r~~wti~~~
Paul M. Mahoney
County Attorney
Approved
Denied
Received
Referred
~i'o
( ) Motion by:
( )
( )
ACTION
Brittle
Garrett
Johnson
McGraw
Nickens
VOTE
No Yes Abs
J ITEM NUMBER /~-~~
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE•
December 15, 1987
SUBJECT: Appointments to Committees, Commissions and Boards
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
1. Court Service Unit Advisory Council/Youth and Family Services
Advisory Board•
One year terms of youth member Emily Reaser, Northside High
School. Her term expired November 13, 1987.
2. Health Department Board of Directors:
Two-year term of Parker Foley.
26, 1987.
3. Library Board:
Mr. Foley's term expires November
Four-year terms of Paula Winstead, Catawba Magisterial District;
and Nancy Eddy, Windsor Hills Magisterial District. Their terms
expire December 31, 1987.
Mental Health Services of the Roanoke Valley
Henry L. Woodward and Nancy F. Canova's term as at-large members
expire December 31, 1987. These members serve as representatives
for the entire valley. They are recomended by The Mental Health
Board of Directors and the four local governments must concur.
Their appointments will be listed on the Consent Agenda for
confirmation.
SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY:
~~ ~~ ~C ~
Mary H. Allen Elmer C. Hodge
Deputy Clerk County Administrator
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
ACTION VOTE
Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs
Denied ( )
Received ( )
Referred
To
Brittle
Garrett
Johnson
McGraw
Nickens
'/
COURT SERVICES UNIT ADVISORY COUNCIL/YOUTH AND
FAMILY SERVICES ADVISORY BOARD.
A. COMPOSITION
Board to consist of two members from each magisterial
district, and one youth member from each high school. Governing
bodies of each county and city served by a court service unit may
appoint one or more members to a citizen advisory council.
B. DUTIES-
• Advises and cooperates with the court upon all matters
affecting the working of this law and other .laws relating to
children, their care and protection and to domestic relations;
Consults and confer with the court and director of the
court service unit relative to the development and extension of
the court service program;
Encourage the members selected by the council to serve on
the central advisory council to visit as often as the member
conveniently can, institutions and associations receiving
children under this law and to report to the court the conditions
and surroundings of the children received by or in charge of any
such persons, institutions or associations.
The Council should make themselves familiar with the work
of the court. Makes•an annual. report to the court and the
participating governing bodies on the work of the council.
.. ~•
•~... As the Youth and Family Services Advisory Board
~.
Establish goals and priorities for County-wide youth
services; assist in coordination and planning for comprehensive
::;.youth services within the private sector. Serve in an advisory
capacity and to otherwise assist the Board of Supervisors to
establish goals and objectives in compliance with all "minimum
Standards of the Delinquency Prevention and Youth Development Act
•• of 1979". Assist in conducting an assessment of the needs of
youth every five years and to assist in developing an annual
Delinquency Prevention Plan; further to participate in evaluating
the implementation of the plan and making a report thereon to the
Board~of Supervisors. Provide a public forum where concerns
about youth may be expressed and to receive recommendations and
raise concerns of public and private organizations at any regular
advisory board meeting upon proper notice. Advocates necessary
legislative amendments to improve community conditions for youth
development and to support the development of needed services
both public and private for youth in the community.
C. MEETING SCHEDULE;
One a quarter, the third Tuesday, beginning January; time
and place determined at meetings.
.' ~:~'
~~'
HEALTH DEPARTMENT BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Established by the Nancy M. Welch, Director, Alleghany Health
District on October 31, 1985. Roanoke County will appoint one
individual for a two year term.
Meetings will be held four times per year.
TERM TERM EXPIRES
.8l. Parker Foley 2 years
3767 Rentland Or:~
Roanoke, Virginia 24018
Home: 989-1194
Work: 989-9500
.:,
. ~t
y 1~ ,.~r::~.~ ~;.~.
-y.4 : :.
~`
LIBRARY BOARD
A. COMPOSITION (Code of Virginia 42.1-35)
To consist of not less than five (5) members, appointed by
the Board of Supervisors; representing each Magisterial District,
members may serve 4 year terms, only two terms consecutively.
B. DUTIES:
For management and control of a free public library
system. Has control of the expenditure of all moneys credited to
the regional free library fund. Has the right to accept donations
and bequests of money, personal property or real estate for the
establishment and maintenance of such regional free library
system or endowments for same. Has authority to execute
contracts for the purpose of administering a public library
service with the region.
~ C. MEETING SCHEDULE:
Fourth Wednesday of each month, 5:30 p.m., Headquarters
Library Route 419.
7~ -
M
H
S
rv
Chairman
Henry L. Woodward
vrecr,a~r~„an
Robert E. Paine, Jr., M.U.
Tmas ur'er
Daniel E. Karnes
se~~e~ar~
Sue Ivey
,a .
November 23,
r
I
7
Mr. Bob L. Johnson, Chairman
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
P. 0. Box 298P1~1
Roanoke, VA 24818-P1798
Dear Mr. Johnson:
According to our records, Henry :___
term of appointment to the Mental Health Services
of the Roanoke Valley Board of Directors as an at-
large member will expire December 31, 1987. The
by-laws of the Board require that at-large members
be recommended by the Board to the four
participating localities. All four local
governments must concur with the recommendation in
order to confirm an appointment.
F~E~~ a~~~~e ~~,E~~ ~a~
Fred P. Roessel, Jr., Ph.D. Our records indicate that Mr . Woodward i s
eligible for consideration for another appointment
to our Board in accordance with the Statutes of
Virginia. At the October 15th Board of Directors
meeting a resolution was passed to recommend the
appointment of Mr. Woodward for a three year term
as an at-large member.
Your attention to this matter will be very much
appreciated.
Sincerely,
FPRjr:cd
C: Elmer Hodge
Mary Allen
Henry L. Woodward
Fred P. Roessel, Jr., Ph. D.
Executive Director
MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES OF THE ROANOKE VALLEY
EXECUTIVE OFFICES, Suite 410, 920 S. Jefferson Street, Roanoke, Virginia 24016-4494 - (703) 345-9841
Serving the Counties of Botetourt and Roanoke and the Cities of Roanoke and Salem
M
H
S
rv
€ :; r ,
November 23, 1987
Mr. Bob L. Johnson, Chairman
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
P. 0. BOX 2980P1
Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 ~
Dear Mr. Johnson:
According to our records, Mrs. Nancy F.
Canova's term of appointment to the Mental Health
Services of the Roanoke Valley Board of Directors
as an at-large member will expire December 31,
1987. The by-laws of the Board require that at-
large members be recommended by the Board to the
four participating localities. All four local
governments must concur with the recommendation in
order to confirm an appointment.
cr,ar„~,<,,,
Henry L. Woodward
lhc~~-Chairman
Robert E. Paine, Jr., M.D.
Treasurer
Daniel E. Karnes
S,=c rerar;~
Sue Ivey
E,<,«~~;ae~;.e~~~„ Our records indicate that Mrs. Canova is
Fred P.Roesse~,Jr.,Ph.D. eligible for consideration for another appointment
to our Board in accordance with the Statutes of
Virginia. At the October 15th Board of Directors
meeting a resolution was passed to recommend the
appointment of Mrs. Canova for a two year term as
an at-large member.
Your attention to this matter will be very much
appreciated.
Sincerely,
Fred P. Roessel, Jr., Ph. D.
Executive Director
FPRjr:cd
C: Elmer Hodge
Mary Allen
Henry L. Woodward
Nancy F. Canova
MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES OF THE ROANOKE VALLEY
EXECUTIVE OFFICES, Suite 410, 920 S. Jefferson Street, Roanoke, Virginia 24016-4494 - (703) 345-9841
Serving the Counties of Botetourt and Roanoke and the Cities of Roanoke and Salem
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, DECEMBER 15,1987
RESOLUTION N0. 121587-7 APPROVING AND
CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH
ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA
FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM J -
CONSENT AGENDA
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That that certain section of the agenda of the
Board of Supervisors for December 15, 1987, designated as Item J
- Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as
to each item separately set forth in said section designated
Items 1 through 4, inclusive, as follows:
1. Confirmation of Committee Appointments to the
Planning Commission and the Mental Health Services
of the Roanoke Valley.
2. Request for acceptance of the following roads into
the Virginia Department of Transportation
Secondary System:
a. Sean Lane and Olde Tavern Road
b. Country Lane
c. Forest Edge Drive
d. Canter Drive, Cavalier Drive, Chaucer's Court
and Gloucester Court
e. Meadwood Drive and Quail Place
3. Acceptance of water and sewer facilities serving
Branderwood Section 3.
4. Authorization to execute contracts with C&P
Telephone Company to establish Centrex Rate
Stability Plan C-Virginia .
5. Authorization for Lease Purchase of the Mechanical
Arm Refuse Collection Vehicle.
2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized
and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said
4
items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to
this resolution.
On motion of Supervisor Nickens after removing Item J-5
for discussion, seconded by Supervisor Brittle, and upon the
following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson
NAYS: None
Supervisor Nickens moved to approve Item J-5 after
discussion. The motion was seconded by Supervisor McGraw and
carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Brittle, McGraw, Nickens Johnson
NAYS: Supervisor Garrett
A COPY - TESTE:
Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
12/18/87
cc: File
Phillip Henry, Director of Engineering
John Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator
Clifford Craig, Director of Utilities
John Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator
Gardner Smith, Director of General Services
A-121587-7.a
ITEM NUMBER .~ -
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE
December 15, 1987
SUBJECT: Confirmation of Committee Appointments
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The following nominations were made at the previous board meeting
and must now be confirmed by the Board of Supervisors. The
nominee has agreed to serve.
Planning Commission
Carolyn Flippen has been nominated by Supervisor Johnson to serve
a second four-year term as representative from the Hollins
Magisterial District. Her term will expire on December 31, 1991.
Donald Witt has been nominated by Supervisor Brittle to serve a
second four-year term representing the Cave Spring Magisterial
District. The term will expire on December 31, 1991.
Mental Health Services of the Roanoke Valley
Henry L. Woodward and Nancy F. Canova have been nominated by the
Mental Health Services Board of Directors to serve another
two-year term. Their terms will expire December 31, 1989. The
Board must concur with these nominations.
SUBMITTED BY:
~.
Mary H. Allen
Deputy Clerk
Approved (x)
Denied ( )
Received ( )
Referred
To
APPROVED BY:
LyZ~
Elmer C. Ho ge
County Administrator
ACTION
Motion by: Harry C. Nickens/Alan H.
Brittle
VOTE
No Yes
Brittle x
Garrett x
Johnson x
McGraw x
Nickens x
Abs
cc: File
Planning Commission File
Mental Health File
ITEM NUMBER ~.~ ~ ~--
AT A REGULAR MEETING OFHEHROANOKE OCOUNTYEADMINISTRATIONNCENTER
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT T
MEETING DATE: December 15, 1987
SUBJECT: Acceptance of Sean Lrtataod $eaondaryrSystem,into the
Virginia Department of Transpo
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
Edgar E. Crockett and Bonnie B. Crockett, the
Section 1, Bellevue Estates and subdivision of Lot
Section 1, Bellevue Estates, requests that
Supervisors approve a resolution to tacceptgOn08
Transportation requesting that they
Lane and 0.28 miles of Olde Tavern Road.
The staff has inspected this road along with
the Virginia Department of Transportation and
acceptable.
FISCAL IMPACT:
No County funding is required.
RECOMMENDATION:
The staff recommends thaaccept
VDOT requesting that they stem.
into the Secondary Road Sy
SUBMITTED BY:
~~
Phillip Henry, E•
Director of Engineering
Board approve a
Sean Lane and
APPROVED:
resolution to the
Olde Tavern Road
~G l~
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
1
developers of
20, Block 1,
the Board of
Department of
miles of Sean
representatives of
find the road is
~- ~'. ~,
Approved
Denied
Received
Referred
To
Motion by:
ACTION
Brittle
Garrett
Johnson
McGraw
Nickens
VOTE
No Yes Abs
~=~~`
AT THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, DECEMBER 15, 1987
RESOLUTION REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF
SEAN LANE & TAVERN ROAD INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That this matter came this day to be heard upon the
proceedings herein, and upon the application of Sean Lane and
Olde Tavern Road to be accepted and made a part of the Secondary
System of State Highways under Section 33.1-229 of the Virginia
State Code.
2. That it appears to the Board that drainage easements
and a fifty (50) foot right-of-way for saids road have been
dedicated by virtue of a certain maps known as Section 1,
Bellevue Estates Subdivision which map was recorded in Plat Book
9, Page 315, of the records of the Clerk's Office of the Circuit
Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, on March 11, 1985 and
Subdivision of Lot 20, Block 1, Section 1, Bellevue Estates,
which map was recorded in Plat Book 9, Page 346 of the records of
the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County,
Virginia on November 12, 1985 and that by reason of the
recordation of said map no report from a Board of Viewers, nor
consent or donation of right-of-way from the abutting property
owners is necessary. The Board hereby guarantees said
right-of-way for drainage.
3
'^~~
3. That said roads known as Sean Lane and Olde Tavern Road
and which are shown on a certain sketch accompanying this
Resolution, be, and the same are hereby established as public
roads to become a part of the State Secondary System of Highways
in Roanoke County, only from and after notification of official
acceptance of said streets or highways by the Virginia Department
of Transportation.
4
~ ..
~ S Y~I
• ~ ,~A~
'Z
F i, rr`
\rI
~ ~
,lnu~YN~
+4`~eavaw~
ai r
~'?e~Cb
-- -.
{ YAOD v//
` ` =o,
~~
r `. C
1_r
~~ , \
~~~
~ ~~ 1- . -
,~-.
- ~ ~~
BOf~LWRT//
VICINITY MAP \~.1 ~~ aa/
~ ~,~ ,«y
N
NORTH
See Mop
®- a ~.
~q~. APPLE TREE ~ ~
DEPARTMENT OF Acceptance of Sean Lane and Olde Tavern Road
PUBLIC FACILITIES
AT THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, DECEMBER 15, 1987
RESOLUTION 121587-7.b REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF
SEAN LANE & TAVERN ROAD INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That this matter came this day to be heard upon the
proceedings herein, and upon the application of Sean Lane and
Olde Tavern Road to be accepted and made a part of the Secondary
System of State Highways under Section 33.1-229 of the Virginia
State Code.
2. That it appears to the Board that drainage easements
and a fifty (50) foot right-of-way for saids road have been
dedicated by virtue of a certain maps known as Section 1,
Bellevue Estates Subdivision which map was recorded in Plat Book
9, Page 315, of the records of the Clerk's Office of the Circuit
Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, on March 11, 1985 and
Subdivision of Lot 20, Block 1, Section 1, Bellevue Estates,
which map was recorded in Plat Book 9, Page 346 of the records of
the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County,
Virginia on November 12, 1985 and that by reason of the
recordation of said map no report from a Board of Viewers, nor
consent or donation of right-of-way from the abutting property
owners is necessary. The Board hereby guarantees said
right-of-way for drainage.
3. That said roads known as Sean Lane and Olde Tavern Road
and which are shown on a certain sketch accompanying this
Resolution, be, and the same are hereby established as public
roads to become a part of the State Secondary System of Highways
in Roanoke County, only from and after notification of official
acceptance of said streets or highways by the Virginia Department
of Transportation.
On motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by Supervisor
Brittle, and upon the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson
NAYS: None
A COPY - TESTE:
.~ .
Mary H. A len, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
12/18/87
cc: File
Phillip Henry, Director of Engineering
Arnold Covey, Department Review Director
Va. Department of Transportation
ITEM NUMBER y~,2.
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: December 15, 1987
SUBJECT: Acceptance of Country Lane into the Virginia Department
of Transportation Secondary System.
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The residents of Country Hills Subdivision, requests that the
Board of Supervisors approve a resolution to the Virginia
Department of Transportation requesting that they accept 0.35
miles of Country Lane.
The staff has inspected this road along with representatives of
the Virginia Department of Transportation and find the road is
acceptable.
FISCAL IMPACT: ~uJ
This is part of the Roanoke County Bond Program.
RECOMMENDATION:
The staff recommends that the Board approve a resolution to the
VDOT requesting that they accept Country Lane into the Secondary
Road System.
1
~~
SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED:
Phillip Henry, P E. Elmer C. Hodge
Director of Engineering County Administrator
-------------------------------------------------
ACTION VOTE
Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs
Denied ( ) _ Brittle
Received ( )
Referred
To
Garrett
Johnson
McGraw
Nickens
2
~ ~!J
AT THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, December 15, 1987
RESOLUTION REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF
COUNTRY LANE INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That this matter came this day to be heard upon the
proceedings herein, and upon the application of Country Lane to
be accepted and made a part of the Secondary System of State
Highways under Section 33.1-229 of the Virginia State Code.
2. That it appears to the Board that drainage easements
and a fifty (50) foot right-of-way for said road have been
dedicated by virtue of a certain map known as Country Lane
Subdivision which map was recorded in Plat Book 9, Page 65, of
the records of the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke
County, Virginia, on May 19, 1976 and that by reason of the
recordation of said map no report from a Board of Viewers, nor
consent or donation of right-of-way from the abutting property
owners is necessary. The Board hereby guarantees said
right-of-way for drainage.
3. That said road known as Country Lane and which is shown
on a certain sketch accompanying this Resolution, be, and the
same is hereby established as a public road to become a part of
the State Secondary System of Highways in Roanoke County, only
from and after notification of official acceptance of said
street or highway by the Virginia Department of Transportation.
3
• O
S~ fe •~,
CQM!
I
I
I
~~
T6?~
to ~/
~,
H
~1 J'L
~9 N
9
67~ a~:_ .
694 ~w. ve , ~~
(LF o~`ocM ~ 3 ~'`~PEST TESILI NORTH
VICINITY MAP, ~" ~~~ ~ t.
< DEPARTMENT OF Acceptance of Country Lane
PUBLIC FACILITIES
AT THE REGULAR MEETING OF TIE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, December 15, 1987
RESOLUTION 121587-7.c REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF
COUNTRY LANE INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That this matter came this day to be heard upon the
proceedings herein, and upon the application of Country Lane to
be accepted and made a part of the Secondary System of State
Highways under Section 33.1-229 of the Virginia State Code.
2. That it appears to the Board that drainage easements
and a fifty (50) foot right-of-way for said road have been
dedicated by virtue of a certain map known as Country Lane
Subdivision which map was recorded in Plat Book 9, Page 65, of
the records of the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke
County, Virginia, on May 19, 1976 and that by reason of the
recordation of said map no report from a Board of Viewers, nor
consent or donation of right-of-way from the abutting property
owners is necessary. The Board hereby guarantees said
right-of-way for drainage.
3. That said road known as Country Lane and which is shown
on a certain sketch accompanying this Resolution, be, and the
same is hereby established as a public road to become a part of
the State Secondary System of Highways in Roanoke County, only
from and after notification of official acceptance of said
street or highway by the Virginia Department of Transportation.
On motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by Supervisor
Brittle, and upon the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson
NAYS: None
A COPY - TESTE:
.J~•
Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
12/18/87
cc: File
Phillip Henry, Director of Engineering
Arnold Covey, Department Review Director
Va. Department of Transportation
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPE ITEM NUMBER ~- ~ ~+
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINIS OF ROANOKE
STRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: December 15, 1987
SUBJECT: Acceptance of Forest Ed e
Dep ent of Transportation SecondaDrive into the Virginia
y System.
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
Fralin and Waldron, Inc. the developer of Forest Ed e re
that the Board of Supervisors a g
Virginia Department of Transportation requesting that th quests
0.52 miles of Forest Edge Drive, PPrOVe a resolution to the
ey accept
The staff has inspected this road along with
the Virginia Department of Transportation and
acceptable.
FISCAL IMPACT: CC~
No County funding is required.
RECOMMENDATION:
representatives of
find the road is
The staff recommends that the Board a
Se~ondaryuRoad System they accept Forespt oEdge Dr~Vetiontto the
o the
SUBMITTED BY:
/~~~C~~
Phillip T. Henr ~y~~
Director of Engineering
APPROVED:
~~
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
1
~_,~~
-------------------
ACTION VOTE
Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs
Denied ( ) Brittle
Received ( ) Garrett
Referred
To Johnson
McGraw
Nickens
AT THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, DECEMBER 15, 1987
RESOLUTION REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF
FOREST EDGE DRIVE INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That this matter came this day to be heard upon the
proceedings herein, and upon the application of Forest Edge
Drive to be accepted and made a part of the Secondary System of
State Highways under Section 33.1-229 of the Virginia State Code.
2. That it appears to the Board that drainage easements
and a fifty (50) foot right-of-way for said road have been
dedicated by virtue of a certain map known as Forest Edge
Subdivision which map was recorded in Plat Book 10, Page 29, of
the records of the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke
County, Virginia, on October 28, 1986 and that by reason of the
recordation of said map no report from a Board of Viewers, nor
consent or donation of right-of-way from the abutting property
owners is necessary. The Board hereby guarantees said
right-of-way for drainage.
3. That said road known as Forest Edge Drive and which is
shown on a certain sketch accompanying this Resolution, be, and
the same is hereby established as public road to become a part of
the State Secondary System of Highways in Roanoke County, only
from and after notification of official acceptance of said
street or highway by the Virginia Department of Transportation.
3
I ~l> si ~ ~ ~ ., LOST MOUNTAI Jt ~ ~{,.~. f ~,,o ~ ~.
'~ Site ~,~ _ ~,._
~` 62 1786 ~C~ " (31T, ~9f8 ~~T5~~~6ar' r
1
~ O \ ~ ni 6 BEM I
Z re ~ C o a,ou~~ ..6vo~i~ ~ ~
. ~,~: ~ N
~~ ~_ 6~7 I
o -~
VICINITY MAl/ . ~~ ,,,< ~~~ , ~ ~
NORTH
0
20
,.~,
+,+IOT
+~ ;.,I
I j
~!9 17
- 2.~ ~~ •~
• 16 ~ Gdor
s Js EOO•
34.3 i ,.••' r+a
ta.a2ac IS a
25 'o
,., ,i
5 39
ss 14 •' 26°p r •' ~• ': 6.60 Ae
'~ -027 12.20 Ac
1.r 13 ~. ~
t I~ •+ rj t28p ~
~:I ~~'•
• 8
. ° ~ ' 42.1 .°'' 38 37 ~ 7
O • ~ 11 ~ ~ •~ ~'
..tt 10 fi „tr, _ ,ry
B 34.2 I.IOAc / 2.06
.' ' •
Fo.wr `~ g ~s ~ 16.73 Ac 41
•w A i ~, . •, Eo(65~ ,~,~ s 4 Ac(D) I.OOAc 42 /
,~ 0 2 I 2.3a
1.97 Ac (CI ~ 6
'' ~ 33 32 ."'." .,." 2.50Ae
43. b.
~7,+ s 34 .~ a ,~ c ~ ~ e 43.1 "~
Y s ' ,,, ~ ~ 44 ,, ~ ,•
a ~ ~ ~ 2.06 Ac 22,•`'4 = 5 ~ 14
6 .. ,. ~y~. 2.6a
,•3 15
5 ~ ~ Gea. '
• ~' 37 = moo. .0"2 4.OOAe QL
34.6
LoiL 1,39 AC (p)
~ IOT L, ~ 6 3.71 AC (CI
• J t ~41~'' 67
1 I
\ ;, v «
,b o;?.. ~ ,• 34.4
34.5 46
-p f.35Ac 13.74Ac
~ o
. as
~ l16,000~0
-~ u>rYARTMENT OF ~
i PUBLIC Acceptance of Forest Edge
r FACILITIES
AT THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROAN
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATIONE
CENTER ON TUESDAY, DECEMBER 15, 1987
RESOLUTION 121587-7.d REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF
FOREST EDGE DRIVE INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roano
County, Virginia, as follows: ke
1• That this matter came this da
y to be heard upon the
proceedings herein, and u on the a
p pplication of Forest Edge
Drive to be accepted and made a part of the Secondar g
State Highways under Section 33.1-229 of the Virginia Sy Ystem of
tate Code.
2• That it appears to the Board that drainage easem
and a fift ents
Y 150) foot right-of-way for said road have been
dedicated by virtue of a
certain map known as Forest Edge
Subdivision which map was recorded in Plat Book 10, Pa e
the records of the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court g 29' of
Count of Roanoke
Y, Virginia, on October 28, 1986 and that by reason of the
recordation of said map no report from a Board of Viewers
consent or donation of ri nor
ght-of-way from the abutting property
owners is necessar
Y• The Board hereby guarantees said
right-of-way for drainage.
3 • That said road known as Forest Edge Drive and which
shown on a certain sketch accompanyin is
the same is hereby established as g this Resolution, be, and
public road to become a part of
the State Secondary System of Highways in Roanoke Cou
from and ntY. only
after notification of official acceptance of said
street or highway by the Virginia Department of Trans ort
A anon.
On motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by Supervisor
Brittle, and upon the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson
NAYS: None
A COPY - TESTE:
~~' .
Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
12/18/87
cc: File
Phillip Henry, Director of Engineering
Arnold Covey, Department Review Director
Va. Department of Transportation
ITEM NUMBER ~ -~ C~
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE:
December 15, 1987
SUBJECT: Acceptance of Canter Drive, Cavalier Drive, Chaucer's
Court and Gloucester Court into the Virginia Department of
Transportation Secondary System.
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
Boone, Boone and Loeb, Inc. the developer of Canterbury Park
Section 2, requests that the Board of Supervisors approve a
resolution to the Virginia Department of Transportation
requesting that they accept 0.36 miles of Canter Drive, 0.18
miles of Cavalier Drive, 0.12 miles of Chaucer's Court and 0.04
miles of Gloucester Court.
The staff has inspected these roads along with representatives of
the Virginia Department of Transportation and find the roads are
acceptable.
FISCAL IMPACT: C~~~
No County funding is required.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
The staff recommends that the Board approve a resolution to
the VDOT requesting that they accept Canter Drive, Cavalier
Drive, Chaucer's Court, and Gloucester Court into the Secondary
Road System.
SUBMITTED BY:
APPROVED:
U
~~~
Phillip Henry, E. Elmer C. Hodge
Director of Engin Bring County Administrator
1
THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARDANOKEUCOUNTY ADMINISTRATION
AT HELD AT THE RO 19g7
COUNTY, VIRGINIA. TUESDAY, DECEMBER 15,
CENTER ON
RESOLUTION 121587-7.e REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF
CAVALIER DRIVE, CHP,UCER'S COURT AND
CANTER DRIVE,
GLOUCESTER COURT INTECONDARYRROAD SYSTEMTMENT O
TRANSPORTATION AND S
IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
BE
County, Virginia, as follows:
That this matter came this day to be heard upon the
1.
edin s herein, and upon the application of Canter Drive,
proce g
'er Drive, Chaucer's Court and Gloucester Court to be
Cavall f State
System o
accepted and made a part of the Secondary
Hi hways under Section 33.1-229 of the Virginia State Code• nts
g e easeme
2, That it appears to the Board that drainag
a fifty (50) foot right-of-way for said road have been
and park,
dedicated by virtue of a certain map known as Canterbury
• n 2 Subdivision which map was recorded in Plat Book 9,
Sectio
4 of the records of the Clerk's Office of the Circuit
Page 33 1885 and that by
Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, on August 22,
f the recordation of said map no report from a Board of
reason o f rom the
Viewers, nor consent or donation of right-of-way
tin roperty owners is necessary. The Board hereby
abut g P
guarantees said right-of-way for drainage.
That said road known as Canter Drive, Cavalier Drive,
3.
haucer's Court and Gloucester Court and which are shown on a
C
rtain sketch accompanying this Resolution, be, and the same are
ce
ublic roads to become a part of the Sta e
hereby established as p only from and
Secondary System of Highways in Roanoke County,
after notification of official acceptance of said streets or
highways by the Virginia Department of Transportation.
On motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by S upervisor
Brittle, and upon the following recorded vote:
p,YES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson
NAYS: None
A COPY - TESTE:
`~~
Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
12/18/87
cc: File
Phillip Henry, Director of Engineering
Arnold Covey, Department Review Director
Va. Department of Transportation
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTOANOKE
CENTER ON TUESDAY, DECEMBER 15,1gg~ ~ TION
~~
RESOLUTION NO•
CONCURRING IN CERI--A N ITEMSOSETGFORTH
ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA
FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM ,J -
CONSENT AGENDA
BE IT RESOLVED b
y the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows;
1• That that certain section of the
Board of Supervisors for December 15 agenda of the
1987, designated as Item J
- Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurr
to each item se ed in as
parately set forth in said section designated
Items 1 through 4, inclusive, as follows:
1• Confirmation of Committee A
Planning Commission and thepMentaleHealth Services
of the Roanoke Valley.
2. Request for acceptance of the following roads in
the Virginia Department of Transportation to
Secondary System:
a• Sean Lane and Olde Tavern Road
b• Country Lane
c• Forest Edge Drive
d• Canter Drive
Cavalier Drive, Chaucer's Court
and Gloucester Court
e• Meadwood Drive and Quail Place
3• Acceptance of water and sewer facilities servin
Branderwood Section 3. g
4• Authorization to execute
Telephone Company to establishacts with C&P
Stability Plan C-Virginia. Centrex Rate
2• That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorize
and directed where required b d
y law to set forth upon any of said
items the separate vote tabulation for an
this r Y such item pursuant to
esolution.
ITEM NUMBER ~ •~ ~
AT A REGULAR MEETDNGATOTHEHROANOKE COUNTYEADMINISTRATIONNOCENTER
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HEL
MEETING DATE: December 15, 1987
SUBJECT: Acceptance of Meadewood Drive and Quail steme into the
Virginia Department of Transportation Secondar Sy
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The residents of the Meadewood Subdivision, requests that the
Board of Supervisors approve a resolution to the Virginia
Department of TransportnaiOn27 mllestofgQuail lace•accept 0.13
m11e of Meadewood Drive a
The staff has inspectedofhTransportationgand f indrthen roads sae
the Virginia Department
acceptable.
FISCAL IMPACT: C`~~~
This is part of the Roanoke County Bond Program.
RECOMMENDATION:
The staff recommends that the Board approve a resolution to the
VDOT requesting that they accept Meadewood Drive and Quail Place
into the Secondary Road System.
SUBMITTED BY:
~,
~~
Phillip T. Henry, E•
Director of Engineering
APPROVED:
~UG~
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
1
AT THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, December 15, 1987
RESOLUTION 121587-7.f REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF
MEADEWOOD DRIVE AND QUAIL PLACE INTO THE VIRGINIA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That this matter came this day to be heard upon the
proceedings herein, and upon the application of Meadewood Drive
and Quail Place to be accepted and made a
part of the Secondary
System of State Highways under Section 33.1-229 of the Virginia
State Code.
2. That it appears to the Board that drainage easements
and a fifty ( 50 ) foot right-of-way for said road have been
dedicated by virtue of certain deeds and maps known as Meadewood
Subdivision which map was recorded in Plat Book 6, Page 51, of
the records of the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke
County, Virginia, on September 1, 1965 and tha t by reason of the
recordation of said map no report from a Board of Viewers, nor
consent or donation of right-of-way from the abutting property
owners is necessary. The Board hereby guarantees said
right-of-way for drainage.
3. That said road known as Meadewood Drive and Quail Place
and which is shown on a certain sketch accompanying this
Resolution, be, and the same is hereby established as public road
to become a part of the State Secondary System of Highways in
Roanoke County, only from and after notification of official
acceptance of said street or highway by the Virginia Department
of Transportation.
On motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by Supervisor
Brittle, and upon the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson
NAYS: None
A COPY - TESTE:
Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
12/18/87
cc: File
Phillip Henry, Director of Engineering
Arnold Covey, Department Review Director
Va. Department of Transportation
A-121587-7.g
ITEM NUMBER
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: December 15, 1987
SUBJECT: Acceptance of water and sewer facilities serving
Branderwood, Section 3
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The developer of Section 3, Branderwood, Boone, Boone & Loeb,
Inc., has requested that Roanoke County accept the deed conveying
the water and sewer lines serving the subdivision along with all
necessary easements.
The water and sewer lines are installed as shown on engineering
plans prepared by Buford T. Lumsden & Associates entitled,
Section 3, Branderwood dated October 1, 1987, which are on file
in the Public Facilities Department. The water and sewer line
construction meets the specifications and the plans approved by
the County.
~h
FISCAL IMPACT:
The values of the water and sewer construction are $13,880.00 and
$27,637.00.
RECOMMENDATION:
The staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors accept the
water and sewer facilities serving the subdivision along with all
necessary easements, and authorize the County Administrator to
execute a Deed for the transfer of these facilities.
SUBMITTED BY:
Phillip T. Henry, P E.
Director of Engine ring
APPROVED:
(i' ~ F'~-
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
-----------------------------------
ACTION VOTE
Approved ( ~ Motion by: Harry C. Nickens/ No Yes Abs
Denied ( ) Alan H. Britt e to approve Brittle x
Received ( ) Garrett x
Referred Johnson x
To McGraw
x
Nickens x
cc: File
Phillip Henry
Clifford Craig
John Hubbard
2
IQ
9.23Ac
N
NORTH
~~
G ~~r~
N ~C
16
~ ~,
or
S~ .~ ~ 9
J
• / 14 t ~. ,. ~ 4
.~, f3 0 0
~ i6 ~
'~
i . ~ ~r~
.. ,° _ "f
J ~~
~ ~ 20 °
4J~ •t. ~ ~~~~
v~:
S `° ,.
~, n
.~ 74
• J
r ~
T 7 ~.
J • ~ ti
• ~
,.~uuntain Road --~ ......~
b ~'~--''
~.~? W
i00
~z~- .v
n .,~2; 59
4 ,t, ~• •
. 60
0 0 • sl ~
i0 - 0~
~.p s
,b u~ ~s
~ 1
~ ~ 39 ''
iit~s
. .~e
,••'' L
31 ~
~~ t~
~.
~o o ~ `p.
r
,,i~o 'o •js ~
~ ~9 • ,a
~.• 67 Y
:~e4,8 , .u •„
~~ ~~ „
I~
~ i 68 ' 10.1
• ~ ~.~ ..
',, ° b 11.29 Ac
,~
°° 69
rr~ ~ ~
~, ~
DEPARTMENT OF ACCEPTANCE OF WATER AND SE47ER
PUBLIC FACILITIES gRANDERW00D SECTION 3
p,-121587-7 •~~ p
ITEM NUMBER __ y
ETING OF THE BOARD OF NTYE MINISTRATION OCENTER
AT A REGULAR MHELD AT THE ROANOKE COU 1987
COUNTY, VIRGINIA ON TUESDAY, DECEMBER 15,
IN ROANOKE VA,
MEETING DATE: December 15, 1987
Administrator to execute
for the County to establish
Authorization & p Telephone Company ounty
SUB- J~ contracts with C plan C-Virginia for the C
Centrex Rate Stability
of Roanoke.
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
~~~ ~~
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: 1984, by the Board of
adopted October 9, hone
Resolution 84-i76.A the Centrex Telep of
established for the County
Supervisors of Roanok source telephone system nd Cave
s
System as the sole in the Salem a
s. These lines not only service the Countthe
Roanoke and its services are utilize but also
Spring service area facilities, such as
offices and court remote facilities
administrative
school' s adminlibrariese parks e etc .
fire stations, rovided at the Southview
With the new services being P
ractical to also include the North Coun y
facility, it is riOw P lan as well.
area (561) under a Centrex P the cost per line is
lan, er line for a
Under the rate stablandy the rate is $25.92 P
rate this cost would
guaranteed to the County
ear period. Under the non-stabilized
five y Should the County not have Cert7.eneSePerces
be $29.75 Per line. htly over $54.00 p
the cost per line would be slig
month.
IMPACT ~~~ included within
FISCAL I~
hone service are ro riation is
Monies to handleratingtbudget and no new app P
each department's op
required.
RECOMMENDATION: stability plan as
evaluated the contracts an
hone Company and recommends authorization
tabill y
Staf f has Telep
enter into Centrex Rate S
roposed by C & P 387_6000), the Cave
P ounty Administrator to
for the C service area
plan C-Virginia for ~77252000)sand1theaNorth County
Spring service area
(561-~s00U) .
ppPROVED :
SUBMITTED BY=
~-
ohn M. Chambliss, Jr.
Assistant County Administrator
`~-/ '"
Elmer Hodge
County Administrator
------------------------------- VOTE
------------------- ACTION No Yes Abs
Harry C. Nickens/
Approved (x) Motion by: e o approve
Denied ( ) Alan H. Bri
s a recommen a ion
Received ( )
Referred
To
cc: File
John Chambliss
Reta Busher
Red Cable
Gardner Smith
Brittle x
Garrett x
Johnson x
McGraw x
Nickens x
A-121587-7i
ITEM NUMBER
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT TON TUESDAY,
IN ROp,NOKE, VA. ,
OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY ADMINIS1987I0N CENTER
DECEMBER 15,
MEETING DATE: December 15, 1987
SUBJECT; Authorization for Lease
Refuse Collection Vehicle.
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
Purchase of the Mechanical Arm
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: 1987, the
At the Board of Supervisors meeting on July 14,
Board of Supervisors concurred in tan estimatedfcost of $330,000
Arm Refuse Collection System, at ro osals have
600 customers. Since that time, P P ui ment
for service to 3~ the County for the procurement of said eq P
been received by ropriated to date
at a total cost of $300,916.76. The monies app
are outlined below:
Roll-over appropriation from the 1986-87 fiscal $ 89,000
year budget
Amount budgeted in the 1987-88 fiscal year budge 90,000
for vehicle replacement 31,000
Estimated salary savings for the 1987-88 fiscal
year Total $210,000
Staf f recommends that t is t melandobe funded throughla
($97,566.76) be appropriated at th
re ort.
lease purchase arrangement. This urchasempnr the Julye $ P ,00
originally requested for lease P in implementation as
The difference is the result °andhevaluation of bids for said
required through the obtaining
equipment.
FISCAL IMPACT: rovid ed
The funds for the vehicle, $97,566.76, would be p
through a lease purchase agreement with a five year repayment
cycle.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the project move forward and that the
County Administrator be autase 1 urahase programe the necessary
documents to implement the le P
SUBMITTED BY:
71~ .~~Q ~-~'-~,-~
ohn M. Chambli , Jr.
Assistant County Administrator
APPROVED:
C~C' l~/
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
--------------------
-------------------------ACTION VOTE
No Yes Abs
Harry C. Nickens/
Approved (x ) Motion by : ~_
Denied ( ) Steven A. McGraw to approve Brittle
sta recommendation Garrett x
Received ( ) Johnson ~_
Referred McGraw x
To Nickens ~_
cc: Gardner Smith
River Bonhotel
John Hubbard
Paul Mahoney
Reta Busher
John Chambliss
File
RCiA^JDKE TRIES #; i~'G~F'Ll)-~JF~;JS
~'+D tVUtM~ER - 12t~4~r3b98
+'U8L ISlIEF' S FEE - $b8o4(1
F C'ANCK ~ CO UI`1 TY
l3U,~.kD CF SUER VI SGRS
3738 B~'At""EILETvN S~J
F' D 8t) X 29 ~3O!;
F:Oar!GKF VA 24()18
TATc ~ F VIRGINIA
ITY OF ROA^JCKE
AFFIOAVI7 CF Pt.JBLICATIuN
Ir (THE UNDEFSIGNtD)
I~'#ES-y,ICiRLD COF:
P~RATIt3N AN QFFICf'R C3F
_
,
fik AT IUN IS aUgLISHEF CF WHIG#~# ~OR-
THE ROAPILKE
IUF_S E 4~GP.LC)-NEWS, A DAI
Ut~LIS#IED IPJ LY NEW SPAPEF~.
Rt'AN>3KF, IN
IRGINIA, t)t~ CERTIFY T#1AT THE STATE DF
T!-IE ANNEXED
T IC.L JAS PURLISHCD I^J S
~; TFiF J=t?LLt~
~ AID "JEi~SPAs~ER.S
W I'
1G DATES
12/DS /81 MURPIiiJr,
12!15/87 ~'~tJRNING
NESS, THIS ibTli DAY OF DEC{~MSEF 1#37
\ =_ ice, ~=~ -- ~`
L' FiCE!-'.fS SIGNA'T ~----_
c{aw f.laa4go ~.~.....t
sat uaaganos
L dsPtat3 8utxueq
iuaq PlnogS„
aan;n; s,efa;snput
3 ut paadope aneq
can}ral a "^"'~ ~ ~°
clnct Proms}heecld Roa oke
County Courthouse located In
Salem, Vlrplnia, to the
Roanoke County Adminlstra-
lion Center, 3738 8rambleton
saldncentRelaebsenteervoter
precinct will tie used for ell
eleNlons held within Roanoke
County.
All members of the public inter-
ested In the mefter sat forth
above may appear and be
heard at the time end place
aforesaid.
Paul M. Mahoney
County gttorney of
Roanoke County, Vlrplnia
(#3698)
ROANOKE TIMES E WORLD-t`JEWS
AD NUMBER - 112715267
PUBL .ISHEf<' S FEE - ~117,t~4
LS Tf= RHOUDT F EF; GUSON PJATT
AtiEt?CN E AGES
1919 ELECTRIC RU SW
RGANGKE VA 24D18
> TA TE OF VIRGINIA
I7Y t1F RCANOKE
AFFICAVIT OF PUBLICATION
I, i7HE UNDERSI GNED!
IMES-wORL~1 CORPORATION AN OFFIC EFi OF
Wt-
,
LIRATION IS PUBLISHER OF iICH COR-
THE RO
ANOKE
IMES E WURLDaNEWS, A DAI :
LY NEWSPAPER
UBLISHED IN RUANCtKE, IN
Ik GIiJIA
D ,
THE STATE OF
,
7 CERTIF-Y THAT
~7ICE WAS PUBLISHED IN S THE ANNEXED
AID
~J THE FOLLOWING DATES NEWSPAPERS
12/D1187 EVENING
12~f187t37 EVE^~ING
TtVESS, THiH DAY OF 'D ECEMBEF 1987
~~ .---"
GFFICER'S SIGNAT ~_
/a-~~~`
LEGAL NOTICE
Notlee is hereby given to all In-
terested persons that the
Board of ..Supervisors of
Roanoke, Virginia, wilt hold a
public hearing at 7:00 p.m., et
fhe Roanoke County Admfnis-
fraflve Center, at 3739 Bram-
blefon Avenue, Roanoke, Vlr-
Olnia, on December 15, 1997,
on fhe petitlon of JOHN NEW-
. COMB to rezone with certain
conditions A 1.714 acn parcel
o} land, generally located at
the northeast corner of Glen
Heather Drive end Route 119,
within the Windsor Hllis Msp-
Iaterial District, and recorded
as Parcel #76.07-02-52, In the
Roanoke County Tax Records,
pursuant to the provisions of
the Roanoke County Zoning
Ordinance, said parcel of lend
being more psrficulerly de-
scribed ss follows:
A 1.714 acre Parcel of land,
~aIM-iRY beefed of fhe nertA-
Darner of fililt [
gf'ble and Roble IH, wHMn
,fhe 1NInAsor Hllk MaOiperlal
uam x ~ 07-92~-StrdeA sn ttiM-
Reaeleke County Tax Record
A eoPY of fhe Zonlnp Ordinance
of Roanoke County and
amendments thereto as well
as a copy of the petitlon, site
plan, and other documents re-
Isfsd to this request may be
examined In the office of the
Depsrtmsnt of Davelopnhent,
located in Room 600 at
Roanoke County Adminlstra-
tive Canter, 3739 Brambleton
Avenue, Roanoke, Virginia.
Roanoke County will provide as-
slatsnea to handicapped per-
sons desiring to attend publlc;~
hearings. Such Individuals arel
requested to contact the Coun-~
ty office of Personnel Ssrviees~
(703) 772-2019 if special Drovi-I
aidns are necessary for atten-~
dance.
Given under my hsnd this 25th1
day of November, 1987.
Mary H. Allen, Clerk
Board of Supervisors of
Roanoke County.
(15267)
ROANOKE Ti~'~#J_S ~; WORLD_NE'~1S ~~~/
S
AD NUMRE~c - 113+]22277
PURL ISHERi S FEE - $lt?f7.32
EDWARD A NATT
1y19 ELECTRIC RD SW
ROANGKE VA 24U18
>TATE OF VIRGINIA
:ITY C;F RGANOKE
AFFIDAVIT DF PU~3LICATI~3N
1, {THE UNDERSIGNEDI AN OFFICER OF
IP~~ES-wvOkLD
" COF'.PGRATIGN, W#iICH COR-
it)N IS
OR. AI PUBLISHER. OF THE ROANGKE
I#"~I-S F: rJI;F;L D-°JEWS, A DAI LY NEWSPAPER
UE3LiSHED IN
POANGKE, IN ,
THE STATE t]F
iRGINIA, DO CER.TiFY THAT T#iE A~aNEXED
OT ICE WAS PUBLISHED IN SAID NEWSPAPERS
T#1E Fi~LLOWIrVG DATES
12/U1/8T EVENING
L2/#J8I87 EVEfVIPJG
fTNESS, THIS TH CAY OF DECEMpER 1987
t `_I°
FF IC ER ~ S S IGNAT~R~E
LEGAL NOTICE
Notice Is hereby given td all in-
terested persons that„ tfte
Roanoke County Board of Su-
pervisors will hold a poblic
hearing at 7:00 D. m. ori~ues-
day, December 15, 1987, in the
Community Room at the
Roanoke County Adminlatra-
tlon Center, 3738 Brambtefon
Avenue, S.W., Roanoke, Vir-
Oinle, on the petition of'deter
L. Williams, requestinp,[eion-
Inp from B-2 Business fp,,R-3
Residential of a tract contain-
ing 5.08 acres end locaTet! at
7655A and 76558 Marson Road
in fhe Hollins Magisterial Dis-
trict.
Rezoning has been requested to
construct multi-family"apart-
ments. The County Planning
Commission will reviey ).his
petition on December 1, 1987.
A copy of the Zoning Ordinance
of Roanoke County -and
amendments thereto as'well
I as a copy of the petition, site
plan, and other docume~,ts re-
lated to this request may be
examined In the office bf the
Department of Development,
located in Room 600 pt .tpe
Roanoke county Administra-
tion Center. .. ..
Roanoke County will provide as-
sistance to handicapped per-
sons desiring to attenQ public
hearings. Such Individualsare
requested to contact The foun-
tyoffice of Personnel Servlees
(703) 772-2018 If special provi-
sions are necessary fob atten-
dance.
Given under my hand this• 25th
day of November, 1987,
Mary H. Allen, ~
Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County BoA[dDf
Supervisors
(22277)
ROANOKE TI~~IES E W{]RLD-}YEWS
!~7/is
AD PJUM}3ER - 1 1 27 1 5917 3
PUr3L ISHERf S FcE - $1(73.36
EDWARu A NAT7
1919 ELECTRIC RD SW
k1aNCKE VA 2~+C118
TA TE OF VIRGIN iA
ITY CF RL"ANf~KE
AFFIOAViT CF PUgLICA7IC]N
i, (THc UNDERSIGNED)
' AN OFFICER OF
I~
NES-WURLD CORPOF;A7ICN, WHICH COR-
ORATIQPJ IS P%JBLIS}iEJ< flF THE Ri7ANGKE
I~~IES E: wOF.LD-'NEWS, A DAI LY NEWSPAPER
~BLISHED i;J ROAPJ~3KE, IN THE STATE OF
IhGIrJIA, DsJ CEkTIFY THAT 7HE ANNEXED
]7ICE WAS PUBLISHED IN S AID NEWSPAPERS
J THt FU LLUWING DATES
12/U1 /37 EVE'V.IfVG
12/U8/87 EVE~Ji~;G
NESS, Tfl DAY GF DECEMBER I98T
FF IC Er: ~ S ~ IGNAT RE-----
LEGAL NOTICE
Notice is hereby given to all in-
terested persons that the
Roanoke County Board of Su-
pervisors will hold a public
hearing et 7:00 p.m. on Tues-
day, December 15, 1987, in The
Community Room at the
Roanoke County Administra-
tion Center, 3738 Brambleton.
Avenue, S.W., Roanoke, Vir-I
pinta, on the petition of Fralin
and Waldron, Inc., requesting
rezoning from R-1 Residentisl
to B-1 Business of s tract eon-
taininp 2.5 acres and located
on the south side of Kapey
Rosd approximately 1,000 fesT
west of Its Intersection with
Route 119 in the Windsor Hills
Magisterial District.
Rezoning has been requested to
construct a parking area. The
County Planning Commission
will review this petition on De-
cember 1, 1987.
A copy of the Zoning Ordinance
of Roanoke County and
amendments thereto as well
as a copy of the peTitlon, sire
plan, and other documents re-
lated to this request may be
examined in the office of the
Department of Development,
located in Room 600 et the
Roanoke County Admin_ Istra-
tlon Center.
Roanoke County will provide as-
sistance to handieepped per-
sons desiring to attend publkl
hesrinps. Such Individualsare
requested to contact the Coun-
ty office of Personnel Services
(703) 772-2018 if speglal provl-
slons are necessary for atten-
dance.
Given under my hand this 25th
day of November, 1987.
Mary H. Allen,
Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of
Supervisors
(15908)
ROAtNCKE TIMES ~ WI~_LCi-1VE'r!S
AD NUME3ER - li 27112622
PURL ISHER' S FEE -
~74.48
R%ANG~(E COU;JTY
BOARD OF SUPER VI St;F;S
37?8 SRAMBLETGPJ $W
P 0 BOX 298C~U
R~AIVOKE VA 240)1 f3
i TA TE GF VIRGINIA
:ITY C)F kOANOKE
AFFICAVIT GF PUBLICATION
I, (THE UNDERSIGNED)
I~~iES-WORLD C`)RPC)fiA7I0N AN GFFICER OF
r
=~F:ATiC1N IS PUBLISHER OF
tMc"$ ~ WORLD-NEWS WHICH COR-
THE ROQNGKE
, A OAI
1BLISHED iN ROANGKE
IN I_Y NEWSPAptR
,
'k GI+VI A, DO CERTIFY THAT
tT ICE WAS PURL ISNED THE STATE OF
THE ANNEXED
IN S
I THE FOLLOW ING pA TES AID 'NEWSPAPERS
12/C31/87 MU RNING
12lUt3/87 ;~tORNI~dG
NESS, THIS 9TH DAY OF DECEMBER 1987
/~T~~,-` y j
O FF IC Ek' S SIGNATURE -----
Please takeNDnotice that the
Board of Supervisors of
Roanoke County, Vlrpinia, a}
the County Administration
Center, Communi}y Room,
3738 Bramblefon Avenue, will,
on December 15, 1987, at the
7:~ninp session beginning at
p•m•, .hold s public hear-
In0 on the question of the
edop}Ion of a resolution pur-
suant to Section 15.1-238(e) of
the 1950 Code of Vlrpinia, as
amended, concerning aequlal-
tlon by Roanoke County of
certain easements for comple-
tion o} }he Sterksy Force Maln
and Grsvity Sewer Pre~eet,
the same to traverse certain
Droperties loestsd In the Cave
Spring Magisterial District a};
~ Roanoke CounfY, being owned
i by Marble Associate; a pe~n~
sYlvanla partnershlD, and At•
Iantic Concrete, Inc., a North
i Carolina corporation, and
Atalenfia Group, Ina., a Vlr•
ginla corporation, end Robert
C. Bell and Anne H. Bell.
AnY member of the public may
appear et the time end place
aforesaid end address the
Board on the matter afore-
' acid.
Paul M. Mahoney
County Attorney
(2622)
---____
ROANGKE TI;`~ES ~ i~'Uk;Li~-,vE~rS
AD NUMBEr - 1127Ob416
PUflLIS~1ER~S FEE - $i48.9b
<f~ANOKE rUUNTY
BDAk D OF S U" ER VISORS
3738 S RA r'+18 L E 7Q (y S br
P C BOX 29 ~iU(1
kOANCKE VA 24018
TA TE OF VIRG iN IA
ITY C7F RCAIVUKE
AFd~IDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
I - ITHE UPJDERSI GNEDJ
I ~4ES-WLR LU C OF
PO RA AN OFF
IC Eft OF
.
TI ON
F'RATION IS PUBLiSiiCR ,
OF
IMCS ~d~iICH COFc-
THE
~ +~LRLD-n
iJBL ISF{EJ ~E+dS- A DAI
IN ROANuKE ROANOKE
LY Ni=WSPAPER
, IN
IRGINIA, DO CERTIf'Y THAT
3T ICE wAS PURL ISHED THE STATE flF
THE ANNEXED
IN S
J THE FULL OWiPJG DATES AID NEWSPAPERS
12/Ui/a7 ~OPPJIf~JG
12/t~g/87 HORrJING
12/01/8 T EVEf~diNG
12/D8 /87 EVENING
~;VESS, THIS
Tri DAY OF DEC EMBE:F
~~~~
~~ ____
OFFICER.fS SIvN
URE
PUBLIC NOTICE
Please be advised that the
Board of Supervisors of
Roanoke County at ita meat-
ino on the 15th daY of Decem-
ber, 1987, at the Roanoke
CountYAdminisfratlon Center
in Roanoke, Vlryinie,
P. m, or es soon thereaffer
the matter may be heard, will
hold a public hearing oh the
following matter, fo-wit;
Establishment o, Six Year
Construction Plan for the sae-
ondary system of the Sfsfe
Hiphwaya for Flseal Year
1988-1994•
All members of the Pub1le Inter-
ested In the matter set forth
above may sppear and be
heard et the time and place
aforesaid,
A copy of the proposed schedule
referred to above la on file at
the Residency Office, State
HlyhwaY Department, 711
South Broad Sfreef, Salem,
Virginia, and the CounfY Ad-
ministrafor•s Office, 3738
Brambleton Avenue,
Roanoke, Virginia, where If is
available for Publle IhsPactlon
during regular business
hours.
Mary gpen, Clerk
i Roanoke County Board of
Supervisors
(6416)
28 r7//
ITEM NUMBER ~-
AT A REGULARAMHELDN AT THEHROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINI
OF STYERADMINISTRATIONNOCENTER
COUN
MEETING DATE: December 15, 1987
lic Hearing be Conducted on the 1988-1994
SUBJECT: Request Pub
dary Highway gix Year Construction Plan
Se
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~ //~/~"'"`
''~`'"~ ~
SUMMARY OF INFORMATIONS Local Boards of
1_70.01 of the State Code-Highway Six Year
Under Section 33 • ears. The 1986-1992 Secondar
rvisors are required ttwoe(2) Y he Secon ary _ h Board of
Supe plan every roved by
Construction
r Six Y_ ConsTincti fn198 was aP
e Sr ~~ u~t for new
Supervi
we and therRoanoke County Staff (see
In revising the 1986 PIVDOT,
projects from citizens,
Attachment A)• lease note
ro osed plan (see AttacheCific, categories;
When reviewing the p P, into four sp
that the projects are d1°plant Mix, Unpaved Roads an are msmall
onstruction, projects usually or with
Incidental C with their own forces also
projects. Incidental Construction ram is
that VDOT can build Addition Prog ects are
projects rental. The Rural plant Mix Proj
contract equipment traffic or poor
funded out of Incidental Construction• lant mix surface.
surf aced treated roads tthat because of hea ent to g
be upgraded with a P ravel roads
pavement conditieCts provide surface eyed Y• The large contract
Unpaved Road pro? vehicles P ect Category • For
that carry in excess of 50
Attachment C provides StaHeghWay
rojects are included ion the Numbered Prod Secondary
P informa
additionaland VDOT Policies concerning
References ect (see
Improvements. maps for each prof
we have included lace the location of each
I n c l o s i n g s so that the Board can P
Attachment D1
project.
1
!RI
i
/,~ ~ ~-~
FISCAL IMPACT: ~~~
All funding for
originated from State ea d COndary Highwa
Federal Sources,y Construction
Program
RECOMMENDATION;
Staff recommends
attached 1988_94 that the Board
receive Secondary Highwa conduct a Public
public Hearing on
comments on the planSix Year Construction the
Plan and
SUBMITTED By;
~~
Phillip T, Henry, p
Director of '
Enginee ing
APPROVED:
~'ruw
Elmer C. Hodge
------------------------------------ County Administrator
Denied ed ~ ~ Motion by: ACTION -_"'--------------------
Received ( ~ VOTE
Referred Brittle NO Yes Abs
To Garrett - - -
Johnson -" -- --
McGraw - - -
Nickens -
2
SUMMARY
SECONDARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM
FY 88 - 94
23,760,000
2,890,000
20,870,000
•2,420,000
18,450,000
14,700,000
3,750,000
ESTIMATED COST
PREVIOUS FUNDING
ADDITIONAL FUNDING
FY 87 - 88 ALLOCATION
$2.45 MILLION FOR 6 YEARS
DEFICIT AT END OF 6 YEAR PERIOD
3,332,000 = TOTAL ESTIMATED COST
OF ALL NEW PROJECTS ADDED
ALTERNATIVES
1. Partial funding of several projects with remaining balance at
end of period.
2. Deleting some of proposed list.
3. Review previously approved projects to consider
cost-benefit.
RECOMMENDATION
After receiving public comment, have County and VDOT staff to
review comments and above alternatives to prepare final program
for Board of Supervisors consideration in January 1988.
FORWARDED TO THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR AND BOARD OF
SUPERVISORS ON DECEMBER 15, 1987.
,,.r:>
.--t'
~,
CITIZEN REQUEST;
Read Mountain Road, Route 611
Moncap Trail, Route 1728
*Glade Creek Road, Route 636
King Brother Road, Route 865
*Dawnwood Road, Route 691
*Cox-Hopkins Road, Route 915
Cotton Hill Road, Route 68g
Bottom Creek Road, Route 607
Gravel Hill Road, Route 785
Colonial Avenue, Route 720
VDOT REQUEST:
*Lost Mountain Road, Route 670
*Ridge Drive, Route 883
*Penquin Drive, Route 1752
*Colonial Avenue, Route 720
*Burnt Quarter, Route 1083
ATTACHMENT A
December 15, 1987
ROANOKE COUNTY REQUEST:
~l•) Mount Chestnut Road, Route 692----_____
Keffer Road, Route 698----________ Parks and Recreation
Fallowater Lane, Route 795_____________Steve McGraw
*Riverside Drive, Route ___ Economic Development
*Dry Hollow Road 639 ----'--Parks and Recreation
*Olsen Road ~ Route 649_____________
Route 768__________________Public Facilities
*Cove Road, Route 780___________________Economic Development
*Olsen Road, Route 1832_______________ Drainage
*Verndale Drive, Route 1867_____________Economic Development
*Bunker Hill Drive, Route 1602---_______Drainage
Administrator
1. This project will be improved through Park Access
*Included in Proposed Six Year Plan Funds.
3
to r . .
ATTACHEMENT B
DECEMBER 15, 1987
PAGES 1 THRU 15
b
m
ro
n
W
9
7
w
n
m
a
00
r
a
f9
w
1
W
a
OG
.'O
x
.~
w
7
n
I
O
E
w
A
A
O
a
N
n
c
n
r.
0
a
C
~ ti C 7 n h+ M O a
~ 1-~ < ~S b (D w ro N w M
~
N 8 `G a W M W M N A
fe 1+ Ul n< a 9 n C a S b
M a fD w N O. A rt M
~+ w w N a n w' y r
r H
a n a ~o w r• ~ •
W `t G.
~ W < a O
w O r'• Z
rt a n
!+ O
O N
a
~ ro ~ ro
S E m
*1
H A E [ *1
H A £ t H A E [
+1 .1
[
H A H A
A H
O r+
Cn ~3>
H
H
m
v
C
,U
d
N N
xo
c~ c
N
9
g~aayy
t+7 C d
O
C
H
H M N
.'d ZO
M A Z
o a
r
N N
O O
O O
H O O
H
O
n
w N N
r O O
O O
00
00
N N
O O
°o°o
0 0
r r oo ao
O O A F N N
O O O O O O
O O V V O O
rA Oo ao NN
0o rr v~tn
O O O O O O
O O V ~+ O O
~ r ao ao v. v+
0o rr 00
0 o rn rn o
0
0
O O v V O O
N
ca
A
O
00
Oo ~ yOy
~ O 'Z
Z O
7 H
~O ry g0
~ C C C
r
00 ~o rr x
~ ~ O
rz~
ro
ro x
~c o cQi
~ ~o
~ n
o m
d
9
r
r ...
~ °
0 0 0 0 ~ o o n
00 00 00 0o Q °+
~
O O O O V V O O
.- O
a
N
~D
N N A A OG OD N~ ~O
0 0 0 o s r o 0
i
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~
N
O O O O V V O O
~D
N N 1~ A OD OJ ~ N ~O
0 0 O O A F 0 0 N
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ D
00 00 O`O` 00 W
O O O O V V O O
~D
N N A t 00 DD ~ (/~ ~O
00 0o rr oo w
00 00 00 00 ~
F
0 0 O O V V O O
O 9
O 9
ro
t
"
H A
Cd
b
w
w
O
.n
~_ ;
~o
d
w
N
O
ro
m
.Q
n
A
r
a
7
w
m
7
00
7
rD
w
0
w
E
70
00
S
n
I
O
~n
w
A
n
O
O
R
G
n
n
r•
O
H
O
m
r
~ ~ O
~ O •.t1
O
In OD ~
N w O w H
ro y d 'N' '*1 ,R'1 A F. Sb M [" N O' (D Sb M Pt A L' fD 'A 'Tl V7 '•!
m R •t n n N C I+ n ti O r h % n n r C w k n .t to tD
ZO O O
C 20 aoB DM d O
A < fD B NW F+1+•
HO'd to g
p C Xq ~
p,rt
~
Z ~+ 7 0 0
d fDNO ~' m ID W ~D
Ob 7AO
n0
7 VO
N
tDr
C E tD I O
r~i r
Z 7 IE+ N 1 0 N
yy
ro ^ N r~i
~~ ^
~ ~ O
H n r N ,
X I O
HO+ n w y
R rd
ro
< w n B
+ 9P70 ~ 'p dOC 'p ~.,. H
m 7 O w I
B
1+ r-1 ry E rD B M d r ro B O O
a< 7
oo Z K Of b 1+
d ro- < b 1+ A Z
~f
R t r• rcrrD r•
am cn Cm art n n n
° ~
fD N
rD x
E
~ ~ a
z •u
HAEm
HAEcro,J
HAE[+roq
HAEM
HAEm
m
A H
NN N N
00 ~O ~p
00
Vwivwi O H
H~
O o O O O O O O H
O O p p ~ ~ ~ ~ p
ro
C
,
N N
U ~ C C
H r
A C
O O ~'
0 0
C d
NN ~p~O
~ Zr
NN 0 0 O O O ~O C O H
M M r
0 0 p p O O 0 0 m A x
O O O O G
~
_ _
O O F t ~
O O O O ~
a o
0 0 O O
~ b
N N O O
O O aD
0 0 F i~ p0
O O
O O ~ ~ O O ~ O
O O
ro
~
o
A F ~ O f D
O O ~ O R
O O p Ip
O O d
a
~
~
e
r r ~
O O Q n
N 1+
O O •-' O
r
~ O
N
-
~O
a r ...
0 0 ~o
N
O O
~O
A A b
N
O O b
w
O O
~O
s r ~,>
00 ~
°
° F
o
o
' OH 9r
a
~ O
H
m
Y'
N
m
A
O
yx
"~
`O H Oy
Oo A"L
V O
x o
? H
C C A
O
b N C
~o
2
ro
'n
A
O
O
M
U
b
C+~
ro ~ c
,~ ~
~ a
°D
e
o
h. ~ry„y
'a,, r~ O ry
%~rH'a w
O ° x
N O
r oo B
m 0~~,
E
- y 7 C ry
m~ o b
~. nn~„~ O H
~
~
~, r„~H m rry „ti o~xM
r )C w
ln N x O z
~
N
~ bB
~ aa
bN
~
a~ 1 0
ry
rg
,
(D
N
1 ~ ~" M ~ ~ N
f~1 < N g I
< ~ n O y
n ~
a ro
y c ~
E
~ ~
~ E cn H %~ b
f ~' y
7 E h7 tv .y
ynEea xro
~j E
~ t. y~ n E h1
. 7o h7
~O ~~ :~~?E[+1
to 1.n
te "" t+7
.. Nln
r
~ ~^~^ NfV
V V W ~
00 ~ N
NN O'yi
~ O O 0 0 0 0 y
OO H
OO ~'~
O O b
d
~
Z
C ~
O C
O r A N
7 00 O~ ~
n In In : '
C
u ` '
N a
~
d
~^tn v Op
N q
N
~ O O p `O D O C b H
""'
~ O O O
O O O ~~1 H r"~
p m~ Z
O p b a
r
y
H O
~
v
...3
o ~
°°
m. rr
° O ..
K~
~ rn ~ o
In lr V Q
ln~ V V Ow pW NN ~ ~ y
OO O.O ~O N
0 ry rA ~
00 O D
OO
0
0 O
~ C C. n
C~
0
0 ~
~
~ ~ ~ p
~ Z
~ O ... b b
O O ~ O ~
0 0
~o n
~o r, ~
°
x
o rD
~ °.
Oo a
o° po ~o '"
°
0o ,
,
Q
a
~O µ
_
~ ~ ~ ~
O O N
O O b
O
O
O ~
N
~ ~
O O
O O b
O p N
W
~~
O O
O
p W
W
a
H y
O h~ l
r~
ro
m
oc
m
0
m
ro
~;' ~- ..
rn
^ O ~
f
D ~^ W H
O
r
~" f
D O n N
rD C M H '~
r
r b0 r
f
~ (
D
C
~' ~~ B 100 O
V [7 O
p C~ ~ C ~ O O h
r ~
o
~
c*1 ~ ~0' '~
00 Nn
7CO ~
:~ ~
~ t~-~
~~
~ ~ Or r O...
r
~ ON .+
~p
~ ~
~ p
+OD
G~ H
E
m 0
.-.
~D ~OV
O~ MOD ~O V r
...
CiD O+ lJ~ 1n
~g.. O B,
m `~ p.~
C 9 Vf aD [~7 B w Z
F.'1 F
,
+ ~ F+ ,ro g ~p
fD F
O O9 W
µ
7 O p b N
00
ro
Hc)E[
+f HC)Elro+7 Hc7E[ro+'1 'roro Toro
HAE[+7 HnEtn
• [+7
E t t w w N N ..... O H
~ ~ V V
O~ Q` (J l.J
V ~
~~
~ In
W H
H
V W
S
n
O
~ '+D ro
E z ~i
O b C
~C N H
.Z. Q
G) C
y
n
A ~'icp
O A A `~ "'
~
~ _ y py
~
V) ~~ .
. N N
~ ~ V V V V H C H
M N
~ v v ~~ w w W W ~
~~
~°~°
~'~^
rnrn
~
M
G7 Z
d
n ~ r
O
7
~
a o
v
I
O o
H O o
.j
0
n
d F ~ „• „"
W W ~,,, r r ~„• ~ O
p,,, ~~ N N
~ V V V V ~
... ... w w
~~
~O ~O
N N ..
W W
W W I
a
D
In V1 ~ ~ r ~V. ~ p
ro
~ M
o
~
~ rD
D n
~
O (D
d
a
~
.-
b p
~D (7
4 m
n
lD W
r p
_ N
~O
~O
I
N
~D
N
~O
W
w
r
0
9
ro
~
r
o
~ ~
n
H f7
R 1
y
CL
A
zO
C7
_~
`p H O
oD n ~a
V O
zo
~ H
c C A
~.. O
C
b N'y
A ~ ~~.C]
x
ro
j t" f
f' ~ ff ter.
:'~ rown ~
v •• ~
ro
r~-~ n~ n o n T
e m a • o
~ °; ~ Noa i
~ 7eoo oono
cn Z w ~ a
~ C) a n F+ N
00 V7 f9 N
,... O
N Z m Z Y
ry G r
,y n
0
~ H C7 E Rf
70 O+ W
E O to to
• O O O
w O O O
00
S
n
I
O
rn
E
w
n
n rn to
O O ~n ~+
'v. O o 0
Ri O O O
c
n
n
0
0
H
H
O
m
r
.d
00
A
~n
0
.~
V m O
V ~ C
~ U
C e *~ r .a ro t o r -a "~ ~ i o n
c n ~ c o F 9n y ~ o r
d o •• o d
~
B ~~ o e ~w ~ a y. .
v ~
7rtr7o r7~oo~ao r7n~ H
r••o n nor. o
r ro ro
~ -o.
.~ °
~p O O` H
y~oOw 70c' r~ioorn~ o+g r~+~`o~ Z
N C ~ '~
~ Rl B O E O t+1 8 V
+ A
P h'''
~ rt ~ ~ f~9
Hc~Em
HnE~ ro
~-lc~E[a ~ 'd
Hc~E~
to
Q M
O O
W C/f
y
ao Oo W H
W W N
0 0 "" d
O O r r r r
C
%
7
y
Cy <
M H
zo
c~ c
ti
9
ryryyy
h7 C d
N N C O H
OO OO W W M H
N
N ~jyy
~j
h7 G7 x
_ 00
0 0 W rW-•
r ~
A yy
O r
r r
~ D
0 0
v
a o
0 0
~ W C
°
O O 07 OD W W ~
W W N
00 ,...
~
r p
0 o r a r
ro
c o
~
o0
~c rc
i ~
~o n
O N
d
9
r
.-
~0 0
.c n
o m
~ rt
~ w
.- o
0
N
~O
r w `O
~ ~ ~ I
O O O ~
O O O N
O O O
~O
N N ~
O O N
I
O O ~
O O W
O O
W
I
~D
r
o a
ero-o~
ca n
H CJ
[1
y
m
n
O
x
r- .C 7e
~ O99
~+O 'Z
xo
n f/1 7C
? ~-] Cd
'I :~
C C A
~- ~ C
~O Zy
r x
ro
7d
0
°
~~ .~ ~~ ~~
O C rn H O C v H ~ O
O A
m C N H ~ b m ~ rn ro ~ ~? ~ % r A G
r H
.. ro 0 A r C .. ~ d ~ v~
o N
ro •-
N o n °`
E
~ rn -
~rE.A o n rno r
o
r~ 0 e°
A E-rv o 9 ~
9
a~ ° o " as °.° °
w ~
°
a
o
o r
r
ao •• v c
o
v+
urt~ov ~ ~ r. tn•• on
W
w O. ?
;+~ O- •-~^co ~tiO ~ t
nn OA~ On .d
N
^ 'tl v+ o ty ou r ~n o w oc , j
M zw a m ayw a s ~p,wrB.n awrN mcao o~ x
J ~
w ~.
~ o a z x- B y rn
9 of to ~ y r„ a to rn w
to r
~ r,, ~
fo 9
rn Mpµ,~~ O~. rns N
~A N Hco
~~
w t7 rn r3 w w w r
7 7a .ti 70 r,y HAECro.1 HALM HAEM
M
~ ,.~A EP7 HAER7 t
A
Q N
N N
r r
°~ V~ ~
H
A v+ ~, ~~ Uo c o u, v. 0 0 m
z - o 0
o 0 0 0
°
° $ 0 0
°
c
~ 00 0
o
00 00 o
,.. 0 0
w
~
C '
~
1 F
Z [~1
C7 C
O
N H
~
~ rn°` NN AC
S
w -
'~
o
~~ N
.~ o
00
M
C
~
A
N N
rn N w W
W W z
C d
N M
lJ~ lJ~ N N W W p V~ lJ~ •,O z
A
° 00 ~~ ~°~c ~~ ~ vv q
H 0 0 O O O O O O O w w
n 0 0 0 0 0 0
n
c
n
n ,o
t..
N N
W W ~
rr
ww ~
7
W W
~ ~ ~
O
~° ~D
V ~! ~
ww
0o
H
.. ~
H 0D
~
O
o ~
m o
~ ~
O O
00
0 0
~~
o. o
O O
O O
ww
v+ ~n
00
00
00
ro
w
oc
w
c
O
m
o v+ ~n
00 0
rr
00
00
00
00
ro
0
~o
R
fY
9
wl
H
O
M
CO
A
0
z
O
~ H O
~ °
'7.r °
~ H
r CC'1 O
~° r+ z
~o o -.i
r z
ro
7d
to
ro
m
ro
•t
A
r
r~
a
r-
0
d
[T1
7
OC
r
7
A
n
r
7
OG
s
z
'.
00
7
rt
1
O
O
n
n
O
7
n
G
n
n
O
7
H
H
O
d
r
ro
m
W
m
V
O
T
ll~
'*10 < H roO
m CrH tiyO
rn CwH 'T7O
roooc~ Yo` 7 0
yrn
t/~ n 9rn
ro
dv.. VI rowc~ 9
C
b
d ~•• CO ~
~ N 47
W H
CA GO W~
w H b~
r
H
r
O h m l
~ N ~J
O" A IrD O B E y
C
> n ,7. .- f
D
a
o n ~"~~ v
~ f
D
°
•• a w
~
0 .. .. o
~
o 0 ~ ~
~~..x~`i r ~
,
.,oRac'wo ~ o
o
c
rio rt~•• i o
c
x7 rtzo i to c n
n O ~
o 7n O ~ ao
~ o
~n 7rt 7d 0ot
•• O•n ~f)tn~
•• ~ ~ .
c
i
x A 0 0 C
i
x fD 0 7 0 rt 0
Z •1 ~O O
C' M
" O b
y fD < H O fD < f9
' c O ~O .
O
' M c •" C
'L A 6 ro H
X (D
.. fD Go
7~
ry F1 A
O rt N V r N rt W ~+
,y
~ O
rt O O
~ O 9 O y
~
y
~
h+ h
+ O
O~ H
O
t7
~ V
ti
ro
E ro'1
E Hf)E[ro'1 HALtroa HC~E[n
[
'1
HA [
Hf)
..
.. .. .. ..
..
.. .. .. .. ~
.. .. .. .. .. ..
.. r r N
A H
W N r N O N
r W
rnoo " W N
orw.- O r W ~'
o~oo•v~ O W O~ V
oNOOO N 3
Hy
'
o~+ w o•in
o~o o000 0000 ~
° 0°
00 °
o
°
° ~
00 0 00
00 0 o
o
o
C
b <
t/~ V1 r r M H
O
O O O O O O y
O O O O O O
rt+ 9
'A C CO
rW NN ~Or W~-~• OW O~V CdH
OO7 ... OD r W O`~D D`~-' O N00O M N N
~ O
N V V+
O O O aD~ T W
O O O O 0000
O O O O 0000
O O O O ?
drP,
l
~
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
O
V
W
00
v O~ W W w .~ ~
'-
O~ W O W N l!~ ~ ~-' ~
~
O~ .- V+ ~O O Q` W l/~ In O O ~
O O O O O O O ~ O o O O ~
O Q O OOOO V~tn OO
ro
M
Wr+~ X0 0
~ O~ ... .- In In In .+ O~ V OD
~O .O r"r OO ON ~O ~
i ~
n
O~ C~ ~O ~D O O 0 0 0 0 ~ rt
O O O O O O O O O O 0 f 9
O O 0 0 O O O O O O 2
9
r
~n to ~ o
ww oo `D A
~
r r O O
00
~ r T
f"
to to O O "' O
O
_ w
N N ~
N N ~
O O ~
O O ~
O O N
O O
rr ~
l!~ U ~
O O N
I
~o
O O W
O O
~o
w
~ O
r
0 9
H
[*1
N
CV
n
xO
Cyy
'F
•" K ~
~D Qy
~ O 'L'
2 O
S H
C C f7
~C~O
~o p Zxy
r z.d
ro
gi
.p i
I
C NH '*fOCNH'*720C1nH MO
b
Z N
f] ~
C~ A
A C
9
~ ~ .. rr L,,,'~s ,
--
/ -r'
'
C o
N
C
n
Co ~ ..
r
~ Y p O~
t A
9
O ,
.
~
I O~
~ o ~ N
N .. ~ C
b In
1
V
N
'
"
F" N
.~ C
H 's! O
O fD A O '1 O~ x N N O ry O.
O A 7
N fD t0 ~. bd O
~
~
0 'f O~
O N hi n O O N
~
0 OQ 0 8 OD ''+0 = O
o 8 0` Sti O 00 ~~ B W ',yO W M P Ip d M b O~
~ 7 !n I+y N b
n
9
1
7
O
~O G O CY N
Cn 7 w
~
~ ~ n
.. gp O
~^ .~~N m Srt oo
D
.
Hn
ti I
b 00 10
ID
Y (/o
n 70C O
I N
x
T N
,
p C
nnOmh
Q O
A
E
p ~
W OA
£
1
z ~ N
n O OD
O
OC
w
.K
U y N
A
~ ~ <
"A (D N M o r o ra
"
~
ro
y
..
yOy H+ .
N O~ ~... l
.
-.
n
.~
~ v C O O VO O U V._p
~
~ ~ X"~ .O
N fD to
OO7c'ry N
C7
8 n
OD N W B
w n
. W
_
p
7 ~
°° ~ ,b
Hc>>Cm HAE[ro+7
ro
E
ro
HC)
t+
d HC)E[
*1 HAE~
N N V
AW
E v+OW r.. ~
Cn
'
O~OD
E N
O Atn C
1
CwAN
O lnp~ OHO f.. lnW N N~
"
0000 0Op O Olnp~
O O Co 3
O O O O O O o ~
S O O
O 0 0 O
O
O O
n
I p
O
~n
1 _ _
V O
~ M ro
~ N
O p
O
In ~
O p O p
O O
O O p C ~ O A C
O
p
N
O
C)
N N
N
N
~ NO
~~
~C
N,..,
A
O V+ O
A
0 OwAN
m V+InO~
O` U
ODD b
rW
b
0 .., _ M
M
C O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O ~ O Z
O
O
rt
1+ 0 0 O O
O O p b~^
7 N
[r
y
O
O
O O
O~ V1
O ~O "
~O
r lN
~
~ f7
O
H O O y
O O p
0 ,
....
1
~
0 O O O O a u ~
~
H ~
O ° oo
V AO
n
~ O
w
r
b n y ryryO~~ ~ I
O'HM
t
a
N p
p
o C C A
O O O O 1 ~~ O ~
Opp O
~
~ h -1
I
~p p
Az~
0 0 ~ .. M ~
0 0 ~ o
00 ~D„
O o b n
O N i
a
A w
~' o o u, ~ r u
A c
,
0 0 0 0 °° ~ o
0 0 0 0 ~ U p° O O
O
0 ~ f l
~p .p p
0 00 p
I N
n
~D µ
~' O
V V
~ ~ U N N O
N
O O b ~
p ~ O OD .. b
O O 1
O ~o ... b
N
V V N N
p p
O O
~o
~
O p N
O O ~
W
b t!r In N N
~ N N
~ ~
O O r-+
fp U U ~
OD ~~ ~~ w i
I
~p I
o r
'n
; .
I
~ , .. A ~ i ~
o ~ .
r
~ ;'~~
o I
~ ~ ~ i ~;
b
t~ ~~y
b p'v;? arn,a~yr,yZ
~
C~ C
rn
A
V
r
D
.,~
y O
K .b ~r Z O~ y 0O O~ 'V OVO '+J
C
n> p
O
C ~
~
~
~
a
ro O
r
w
f
~
.,
,,,,
9 rn 0 %v l'r I
m
o0
°
~
c
o
W
~ p
,
-- y
~wC
n
~ ~n
^
~
~~m ~ ~ no
~
'
°
o
e
, ~
GN
~
o
m o~oA ~o~!+•'..°
y~agnwoo ?.oo ~or~ry
O )Cn O O DO n n
~~
O
' ~~ 00
O
U
OC
~O'1-+ ^
!D ~ ~ H ~h1 .y ,A 1+~U.,ry V
2 y '., V
^ w E
O ?
a ~,y ~ y n O µ ~
C~ ~'~ Q~ G,
COb Kj ti r
n
O
a
~~ aa
~ ^ Wr t7 ~ ~ ~ C7^w
~ `^' .b
z~ 0.... Ory
00
r, "gym ~ e v,~ yoo ~N~ y
^3n~~ w,., K~o ba a ~ o
a ~ w ,''~c~~~by
W ~rnN ln~ yn ~ b ~
~ ~^ ~V O ~ h1
~~
~
H O N V
y n E t
7
O In O
O
7' 0000 0000 ~ VO AUK ?
by
n O p O p 00 pU U N N V N O A W O y
0 00 00 °°i„ino
'
0 °eo~u, y~
y
j
0
Op 0
O
~^ W~ OOpO
H
0 0
0 O
v
~ 0
~...
v CD ~^ O
v O O _
p
~ b
~
w
~ ° o° o ~„ y 0
-
,
m N~ ~~ 0 O OVOi
.^~ ap0, ~`^~tNi~ Op
c w~,, o00 00~ w^'
'
0
n AA
N
"
0 Oyu NN V
Op
t+ 00 OO In N N ~jC b
~Orw
O
0 0 O O U~ O
0 N b 0~ V Q~
H
0
00 000 ~z
000
o~z°
0
a
r
y
y
O ~o
O
N b
r r
O O
O O
O p
O p
rn Q,
In U
O p
O O
O O
a ~
O p
O O
O p
O O
b ~p
O p
O O
O O
O O
N N
N N
O O
O~ p~
W w
r r
O O
O O
O O
O 0
O ~ ~ ~
O 0 O O
O O O
N N
U U
~ O
O O
O
O p
U ~
O p
O O
O O
O O
~~ W
~` V ".F
~ C
0 0 0 p ~D K
N
O N
O ~ ~
~ •O
O v
~p
V ~.
N
~... N
b
O
O O ~^
O O ~' O ~" to ~o
O O O
O O 0 0
1
O O N
W W
O O N ..
O p O p O ..,
0 0 O~
0 0
O O N
O O W
U U
V V W ~.,,
W
U U N N N
O O In to N N ~o
~ O
O U ~ W
O O r
y
tq
zO
~r~.aC:.
b '~
CO n ~a0
v0
^ y ~
Ty h7
h ~
C ~' f7
O
C
b O y
r Z
b
d
y
O
b
m
ao
rn
O
b
•`' '.r y O
ti Orn
b ~H'sf
2o
7. CN
C Cr
V Z
y I V dO~N
O
0 's7
b~
~ Z
O .~
A
ny z00
1 ~0
~ ~ W 0
3 ~ d ~a 1
E~" bo O'YO 1 ~o G
~ •'~ f7 (~D v
~
`C
~ ~~ ~0o p j~~00~p Na ~~' A 7 ~ C W ~ A bOp
O ry O~
Op O
fD
?
x
O p
A
O B ~p C 7 0. b b
' n S ... Ol y W
A p Co
~
d
(
9
~ „"+7P tD 'AO ~ ~ SO[' rT OAaD~ n SN 0 ~ F00 OpI y
~ O
0
~
~ ['+C7 n
w ~ C
n p c ~
6o A
C... ~O ~ En :~B '
.y w O g h O
~ ~ O ^ .b M r ~ b n v ;` ~ ~ R7 ~ ~ b
O W
N
~
~ ~~ ~~ H
K 9 a 9 :n ~ M O
y
~7 C p y
w N oe
~ ~ ~
~ b
;~;?Tt+7 ~
N
o
HnEm H bb O
ngp7
,77 HAEro lob
;~ n E C•7
O ~O
{ O~ ~ A t. W N [+1
b
0~
W ~O O~ W Oy N,.., AN... fn
OOlntn
O
H
~
0
O
0 0 O p O
OppO
~O N O
v v O H
O o
0 O O
s O p O p 0 0
0
n 0000 Op 00 00 p
H
C [
+1
0 0
O
T O O
O
O
`C ~ ~
In W W 'i1 b
;,~v
~ o 0 0 ~ ~ ON b C
° a c~ Z o
f7 N N ~ O C
y
~ ~
O
n b ~
O
O D\ y
y
~ A W N
O~ O~ O a\ N r N ~-. rry
R 00
00 OO "O "p~U OpO N In yyj Z ~
0
p O
O
~ 0
O
~O SOU d
00
0p
pOO
~
~
n 00
W W ~
y y
O
O
00 0
[+f
0p V
r O
v
0
O 0 I
d y
O n In
~ ~ ~ l"'
O~ O~ A ~.
~ D`
y ~
00 O
y
H
p O
o
.. O p v
n aD
r
rn rn
op
°
°
oo
o
r ~ au°
O
O y U
O p
O
O
O O
O
O A O~
b ~O
O 0
O 0 0 O O
O p
O O ~ W
O ~ O~ ~ t
O O O O O
°
O O
0 O O
O O
N ..
W ~O N -. ~.. n..
y y U~ b ~p N N
•
„ rno~ O
O
_
O y
r AO°p° 00 X00
O p V V
~ U
O~ O~
O ~ W U
a O` ~ In
O p
a
a
O
n
d
n
w
O
7
O
t/1
h1
O
7yO0
~ 'a yytJ
v
~ ~ Z
H to
O
~ C
~ M
OO
A Z
b
0
c~
/.2~~ ~-~
ro ."e Nn 9mrorncHi 9°"T~'-A NrnC
r
n ono
rn rn
ti m rn ~y
ro
e7~""
.. fn v...
O`H
N
0 ~ ~
C o
07 w
b ~
^
o o.e~or,j..~o0O
.ezrH~rnramrDOao+
~ ~r H^7~
rDrD oeo,d
'" o o~
° a o a~o
° z ~ a rn ca
~-' n~•°• o~ r ~ a o~
w 0000 000
+
n
c
~'
~ i
v
ra ~~ oor
o
o~0°n°~n 1 oanz 1 .e
tnO arr~m 1 w
m 7n A
- .
~ r
..~ c °
~
n o w ?n
~i
a°E rt ~
~
E n 7
0rt
d
,1 9 n n Oo
~ cD n OO o
z
o rt o
•f
.y
O Or
`CA
1
0
O~ '1 yy O p ~O r 1 ro
r OC ".
~
N
~
A~ I C7
i
n
.+B
C
C
~'` C (~
JU
O fD O A
O f
i
ZZZR WO
0 rt
~O
w
O
~ O rrn-•q 0
g y rb O
l7 A ~" N Hr''O ZO 9O
x
N a g
N O
OOi nZ
a
n f.. W
r ~o a B N
z r
~ Fi, a N
~ ^ ^ ^ ~ z :
rno rn xw
A rD ~ F v
n
~-
w
%~"~
'Oro ~ .y
HA£[ro'1 HAE[~ ro
HA E~
~
H A E m H A E~ ~
or
W g
u,r
9
V
~ NN Oy.Wr
Tyr
ODD O~In O NOV+ H
E w
~ ww
T~ ~p X000 ~
J
por O~O
O O O O 0000 d
~p _
O O ~ r C ~ p 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O
'.. O N
? C 70
'
'
1
r r
r
w M
L
lv7
rn r W V T ~ ~ U l
l~ J~
0 W O l
O Z O
~ Nao w ~
O J~00 AC
`<
"" O ~ v
V O O
O O p ~p ~D O O
to In O O y
J~ O N ~
J rn O
O O
a
~y
C d
t7
N N ~ w rn rn C d H
A
~
~~ N U
r~00~~D V~O~r O~
~O ~O
M H M
O ~ ~'• ~'• ~ A Z
yv ~O T lA
0000 0000 0
0 CY"
~ ~ ~ o000 0000 1
J+
^ ~,,,,,, rr
C
t7
n r
.p
'.,
~
a
N N
~ ~ w N
~ V O~~O U ~~
N OVD
l
~~
N
N ~O~
V ~ Vftr
OD 0000 ~ o
Oo
O
O
O O V
r r OO
N N O O
w w
H
~o
0
w
rn w
00 O
~O
e
+ O
m
r A A O~ In .-~
° C °O ~
rr c
oc
N N 00
b
^
r r `D O
~ O~
r
°O 00
~n
• oo 00
_
°
°
°O ~O rt
°c
o
o
00
00 00
00 .
r
m ~N r
~c o
0o
00 Oo `DSO ow
00 °O
0 0 oo
" "`
` ~ ~"
"~
0 0 • y
N
~O
N U ~ ~ ~D
~
U W
~O
r r N
O
P P
O
ro
m
oa
0
0
m
H
0
N
[*1
A
Oy
''JCy0
r rQ 'JO
v 75O~qq
7 H C+1
C (C('~~ p
r y C
X00
rz
b
~Q
G")
ro
w
00
m
N
O
'n
ro
m
'S7
n
tD
.-
r-
a
w
a
w
n
m
a
07
r~
r
a
OG
'+720 <V+H'•7Z0
N A til
ZO «'H'•7Z0 n7p ,~o
V7 Z~ °
N 1 t ^y
y °~ A N O
o I N I N O H
c.~n aeoo
a ^ c.r3o•ao
w w
~+ ocnoooao ora,vao c~ti7~ao
~ m w~
c~ n v
z~am~-`vrn r n w n ~
c7n~r•v. r ro w n •o V
°an.~v~n o w n v
raoN
v
c o a v,
mn a~ I m w o a n v+
mr+ ooa o I c >r a N
~n ao I ao x a n N
zn w
I o w w. o m.,..
° c C'7
7 ~owo
~-.~nroo o
ra'nrowo za rD I
~n~o rn
n
.'~ n M O O ° •• (~ t7 aD
'!V n 0 7' O r C n Oo
r n fD O O r .. n ~ W
r N 0 7 0 N n Oo
~
M
< N ~~ N O N < N (D N< 1 O fD < N I O
° A I 'V
m s~FM m
7cn ~n N>r(D m N
p aN 0 A H
~ o
^ ~
99~ y
y
O n^ '-' m ~+ V O O
O C O b
~ ~''' m n n
~ O fp
a ro
Hc7£m
HC)Et~*f
HAEtro.7
HC)Etro*1
HAEt~*r
m
~
_ _
N .-.
O In T W N
O V W ~~
O W ~- In U A
V In In V ~ N W W
N OOOA O N
y ''rte`
y
O ~' ~'
O O O O O O
O O O O v t O v~ O O O O ~ O O l n w H
m
00 0 00 0 O O O O
000o O O O O
po ~ o 0 o v F °
go nor.-F
~
b
N "' ~,
O
Cz R1
W W
c W W V Q r-. t.l1 N
lJ~ V O~ OJ W W
Q V 00 A O C
M M
+ a
O - Z o
A
~ ~ O
O O O O O O
0000 O O O O O ~ V F N
O 00 T.-A
~~~
O~lli vv W W ~U NN C CH
N N M H M
uW+o ~°D„ °O
°
° O°
°
° ~ ~ via
Wo w o
o o o $°o o`OOO~o
~..
O~ l! i N N
V V N N
O O
C N
N N ~
O D
O N N V
OO 00 i
W O W
00
00 00
00 ~O ~O p
p
DD OD
O' O` N N ~
0D
w w v, ~
I
O
O O O O ~
ro
• ~ o
~ w
I
~o n
n
O fD
C~.
a
H
.-
~ O
~ n
o w
I
~O n
K
•' O
a
_ H
~O
~O
I
N
~O
N
W
0
~o
w
b
A
I A t>d
O ~~~a+++
O
m
t
70
7'
R
0
'M
I
>:
w
n
A
O
a
H
c
n
n
r
O
H
-.~
O
w
r
ti
m
A
O
`O H O
V A ~.
O
zo
7 H
C C n
~••' ~ C
x
M yy
A Z ~C
b
b
[i] <Ny
,9 pin yNo
h y ~O '~1 O
'O.. V Ca blOnn YN°<N
g Abp ~"Hizj O ~ CCnb Vn bOCO~
o Ho ' ~ C ~ ~~ aa,o N ~b~~ Cab t"na Zoa
y ~ ev whop ~a ov
`~ nC .'.~,nn o 2n C ~ O Z o~ .°. ~ ~C~ ; G 9 OObr y~N,~
0'pm A ~ ~ v ON O ~ 4' O ~yV ^ ,• ~ O' ~ ~ pp ~ ~ ~ y n ~ ~ ~ O
f.. I'1 ~+VNN N~ ~ (<D ~ C7 hO nn ON Oww T.. .,,,O2 j ~ p3 ~C+d1
X ~ 4
r,D ~y ~ 9 N O .~. h O~ n r '' ~ O ~ 'b ^ ?' V OI y....'
O b ;" rn 2 w H. A C) "y O g g O O h t :v y f)
h (z~ n v ~
~ h0 n < K'.. ['~ O Ax N N
yc)E~ 7r ~ ~ ~ a g Sw O
y a .ty N a K ,.,, N 2
A OO~w nEI?f Hn~M ~ N
Op Oln WN Hf~Et*bj
Op py~~N ...b yn ~,~
o°OOO -°pOO ono Vii'.'
s °O~o° o°o°o °:~oN oo~_ c~
n O p p OO O N O N O y O W O A S p y
O Op 00 OO~~ ~1nO~ y'
O
O
O y~"`
1~ 0 OOpOO 00° Op yy
a o NI.,, °OOO° v
~ o ° o 0 o N rn~
o° o° o ° ~°~^'N
O Op 00 yOln y7b
O pOOO OO tv ~`N C~
"~ OpO OO ~C
~ M
a 0 0 0 O y
y O O n.. ~
n O p 0 O O A
N
C OpOO OO ~VNi O~
„^ O °° p 0 ~: ~ ~ In O- N C b
O a N 2 'r
j ° O O p 0 0 ~~ O`^ C C y
r ""r .... 0000 00°° ~ZaO
~ r0 O° ~ 0000 OOt'~
t Q` ° ~ N A
y v 1` O O p `+H
V ° O O ° •O i.. ~
O O O N O
n N V
~.. O N N ~
O N .b
°O O b'C 'A
° N O
Oyu°~ ~ ~ y~Op
N ... OpQ O ~ ry ~ ti1
~ w~ ° O O p ~ ° C n
Aviv e~~
~ ~
,,,, b ,~,
NN ~ `pU N O
O p ~ ~p `O bn
Q OO w w 0 O d
a
~ ~ ~~
N N ~ O pub O
O p ~ O ' n
In w ° ° -. ~
U
w w ~
b ~
O O
N ~
v ~
N ~
~" rn v ~
`D a ~a
~' ~+ 'o
` N
~ ~ I
~ ~ ~o
w
N N
N N b
V V b
O ~ W
N N r
~r~ k., ~~. ,..
H
O
c~ God~°nA N~~
o
~v9
o~e~
i~
~;' ..~yo~ocHiao~ro~o~NZ°;vo
p ~D fA Z N d Y 1~ W
'd OA
`i1 .'~rH'+fO
~ d H r `O '~
l77 O ~ H '*7 r C' ..V rr ~
O n B N I9 O •1 CD
A..+ O 70 r ~7 '*1 ~-
O C7 O S
< n O O`
N O .G
M ^ O "~ 000 b n
•• 9
r f) y O E M
6
~
._.,
O
• O O ~
W[+1 ~ ~~h
,.~H
W r
7 I N
'A
D
A
B N
W C'1 O04
n 7d
2 7 1 N M
y OWN O y1 000 ~DO~
J ~~
O V 000 R 7:~ .gyp A
A
~
~ ~ ~:~ °~ MG O`O aD ~ NpZOMN I HO
IA
N '~ R 0
G
H
O r~
,y 70 n ~0
O V ~. G.rA O
r F.. C
z ~ 0 y roO
C
N "' ~ R ~ r F'7 C1
.
R V W
C
7 I O W
N
~ O a
H W N
Z
~ C
^ v 00 r
?
,. O
O ()
^O 7C CF 7 A
N
w
s1 S
C
N r H C1 N N
7 9 ~
r N ,
~ v ,
H '1 ~ .4
~O W C]
O N O "~ 1 7c1 :''
7 7~ R7 K O' C~ N 4 70 F~+ ~ W to d
r0 :"
O (D QG
ID fD 'A :0 W b d ' y o
= ro
~-1c~EC+f
%
E ~
.~C~Em
o
o ~tl`d .dc)E~ 1
[
~-1c~ w
rnr a`r" ° ~
N N00 N O~Otn
~
V 0000 H~
~In W
£ A V O N O H O O p l
J~rA
p 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M
C
•• O O O O O
O O O O O
O O O O
A 0 0
0 0 O O
O O
O O O O
x M 'd
m
z
1 ~, r ~- _ o <
'O++ N~ O l!~ O O H H
C
~ p
O ~
N
m
K p O
0 0 ~ o` O
O~ T O O
O
O
0
O
~~pp y7
M C G
f') ~ in
~VriNN z r+
CO.-7
rnrr _
OaD 00v F~~ 0000 ~ ZO
A No0 v+w
O V O N O.o O '.. A
O N
0000
C<1 G~Z
~ _
O~•
m O U O v~ O~
0 0 0 0 W 0 W
rOr 0 0 0 0
R o000 0000
0 0 O
,1 0 0 0 0
c
n ~o
~" _
o ~' °` c No
N v
o r ~n ~ o I
~
w
N o 00 0~0
O
a
~Iwr o 00
H
.. ~O
"'3 rn o~
Oo„ ~""' ~, r .n
Ooo a7
°'
'
' oi '
00 000 `°
v~
i,, o
"
0
0
° n
°
° "
o000
0
0000 00 000
0
0
0 o
o 0 ro
M
~O O
W W
~O ~O ~ ~
0O OO
~O N
o.o ~~ 1 n
0 0 ~ ~ o o ~ n
o rD
pO ~!v OO O.
O O 9
r
_
r
_
F F
° ° ~O O
.c n
$ to .n
°O
0
0 O w
~w
0 0 00 0
00 '-' ~
O O O O y
O O
~O
_
N N ~
O O ~
O V N °
° N
~ ~ y ~ O
O
O O
O O O
~O
N N N
I
N N ~p
lJ~ N~ W
O O
O O
O O
r
~O
~o
w
.d r
d J ~! I
~p
on ~' "' r
~ 0 0
0 0
r oo A
0
o ~ H
"" r o
~n
.-
~ ~~ ~
~~
00
00
N
IV
O
.- ~ ~
~o~z
zo
n N 7~
7 H CC
~ A O
H C
~o~
rz
ro
ro
m
w
to
O
M
tr
ro
m
"~ z ~-
rov o:~
a
o
'°
~'
x
rorn
n v
,zN y
zu `^c?yzo
~
~aooo
C7
d
fD I V ~ I V
O~ y~ W C
U
N
H
~
8 C N frp H 'i7 < A bd ~-
O h O~ f 7 0~ '1 Oo < C" O Y ~•• W 70 C" H '~7
..
~ n o 0 0
°°° e N ~< av ~o rev rn
~
n ~ •°
o W
R
y
~^~ ~ I d H 00 1
p
fD •
~
f
a
~ Pp n C ~ h7 7 n '
V 9 N y
`G
~
BOO ~y ,
...,
Y?A0+ OZ ai
7n
I+f ~'" fy C OO~:~ O m
< O ro OOp
.
[+1 ry SOyn
OC A
C" n NN ~~ ^ n
O
d~/+
~ro
1
~+ aD M tr fD n
OA
OD
.ro "" 0 0 y n N W .- ~p H
~ .~ 6 <X C ~''~N Cl+~N ~O r.~O
~ C ~+ ~ [+OB Ah ~ ~ Vnz
t+1 ~''' ~
ry
µ
r
7 O
.
(D 00 O
w HA:~ro
o
~ .roro
HAS[+1 HAEroN
Em
~
O~n7 HA
HAEM
~wwau ~
E
pUN N __
NOS-.. oov rn
~.. A H
~+ V+ In V
O O In In O O~ Oo O~ N
A ~O W N A O V N 0 0 O
0 0 H
O O p
w A O ~,,,,,
W In In
O O O O O O O H
0 0 0 0
~
n ~
O O p
O O O O
1
O N r
~ oo~
y ~M
°~~° ~ro
R1
O N fy
N to
v O ~o `O O C7 C
N N O y
O O O
A O~ A ...,
Oo a+ v ~„~
A
O
r~ r~
r-.NO r
N O ~
a ~p
M~
C
7
~, ~ 1n 0000 O
r
~° VOA
o~' Oa
a~
0 O
0 ~o
'
'~ N In F W O O In In
0 0
O
o000 0 0 O p
:~ 7.
o
t+~c~
°
o
~
n 00
c o ° oo
oa
o
$
O 0 0 0 C
W N N
° A O N
~ r °~ oo au
A oo V W ~
~ ~ ~ W N r+
O O ~ D ~
H ~
r 0 ... W i
~
aD
0 0 0
N i-.
H
° F ~ p A
n ~ V W C
~ N O O D W U ~~ 0 0 0 ~
~ O~ OV N ~ V " Vt lA DO
~O ~O 0 0 O O N
O O~ Oo
pp
N N ~
O O
t
~ N F ~ p ro
N W W to O O ~p p
N ~O W O
O 0 0 ~°
~~.. °~O O O
OO I
~°n
n
O fD
a
A ~ F
O In ~O U a
~ AOO O~ F"
0 '.. ~..
A 0
01np ~ A
O~ V ~° p O n
~ K
N N ~-' O
a
W O N to
N V r-. W ~"
O A W W ~
~
00 ~-.. ` _
T Oo Oo p 1
N
N N.
N N
V r W ~„
O V1 O~ ~p
V ~
O _
W N ~°
NNOO ~O OV1 M ~O
W W O O 0 0 O
O O O O O O W
O
N N
N r
0 0 ~
~
~ v~ .: ~-
N N p p O O O O ~ O
0D 0 0 0 O O O O ~
O O
O O A
`o ~O A
f
C
33
+
d
p t
y
~
a
o O
o O y`
O O A
y
tL
z0z
C
b ~ O
O A
V
°zo
ry7H~
C C A
b ~ C
~D
<* Z
ro
'~
/ ~ ~ ~/ .._
/f ~f7 ~
;~~ J
ATTACHEMENT C
DECEMBER 15, 1987
STATE CODE REFERENCES ANDUDESTTHELFOLLOWINGCERNING SECONDARY
HIGHWAY IMPROVEMENTS INC
Sections 2.1 through 2.3 and Pages C-1 through C-27
Virginia Department of Highways and Transportation
Guide for Secondary Road Improvements
! ~s~ '~ /
2.0 SECONDARY HIGHWAY CONSTRUCTION
2.1 Introduction inia
On an annual basis, the Commonwealth of Virg
provides construction funds to each County specifically
and reconstructing secondary highways.
for constructing
Sections 33.1-23.1 through 23.4 of the State Code
outline how construction funds are to be allocated to
each County for Secondary Highways, while Sections
33.1-70.01 through 71 outline the procedures for
prioritizing specific projects.
2,2 State Code References highway
§33.1-23.1. Allocation of funds among
- A. The State Highway and Transportation
systems. -
Board shall allocate each yea r f rpm all funds made
available for highway purposes such amount as it deems
reasonable and necessary for the maintenance of roads
within the interstate system of highways, the primary
s the secondary system of state
system of state highway ,
highways and for city and town street maintenance
payments made pursuant to §33.1-41.1 and payments made
to counties which have withdrawn or elect to withdraw
from the secondary system of state highways pursuant to
§33.1-23.5:1 of this Code.
B. After funds are set aside for administrative
and general expenses and pursuant to other provisions in
this title which provide for the disposition of funds
C-1~
odor to allocation
allocation for hi9hwa `Y -< .`-`
section is made pursuant to Y durposes, and after .~`,
• the State 8i subsection A o
shall allocate each 9hwaY and Transport f this
for hi Year the ation Board
9h way purpose remaining funds availab
int ate lus• °f
erst s, exc ive le
construct sYstem• among the severa federal funds for the
33.1-23.1. ion first pursuant 1 highway systems for
.2 and then tO §§33.1-23.1: 1
1 • Fort as follows: and
Y pe r
°f federal aid mcent of the remaining f
shall be allOCa atchin9 funds for the i unds exclusive
ted nterst
highways includi to the primary syste ate sYstem
additi ng the a rte r• m o f state
syste °n• an amount shall be ial network, and
m as inter e alto in
sated
subsect • s to t ma t ch i tO the primary
2 • ion B ° f §33.1-23.2, ng funds as provided i
Th i rt n
Y pe r
°f federal-aid mat cent °f the remaining f ~~;
sha be chin9 fund unds exclusive
pu ll allocated to s f°r the interstate
rsuant to X33, 1_44• urban highways for Sta system
3• to aid
Thirty percent f
of federal-aid mate ° the remaining f ,;
shall be hang funds for unds exclusive
highways. allocated tO the seco the interstate system
(1977.c.578: 1979, c. 84. nda ry System °f stat
. 1985, c.42.~ e
a l 1 §33.1-23.1:1. pnpa ve
°cations. -- A, d secondary road fund
distribution for h Before funds are all created
ighiyay cOnst ocated for
ruction ursuant to
C-2
/ .:~' ° ~' ~° ~ ~ 1
X33.1-23.1 B 1, B 2, and B 3, a fund shall be
established for the paving of nonsurface treated
secondary roads which carry fifty vehicles or more per
day. Such fund shall contain 5.67 of the total funds
available for highway construction under X33.1-23.1 B 1,
B 2, and B 3.
B. Such funds shall be distributed to counties in
the secondary system based on the ratio of nonsurface
treated roads in each county carrying fifty vehicles or
more per day to the total number of such nonsurface
treated roads in the Commonwealth.
C. The governin bpd of an count ma
g y Y Y y have funds
allocated to the county under this section added to the
county's secondary system construction funds allocated
pursuant to X33.1-23.4. For each $250,000 or portion
thereof added secondary ,construction funds under this
provision, the amount of the county's nonsurface treated
roads used to distribute funds under this section in
subsequent years shall be reduced by 1 mile or
proportional Dart of 1 mile. (1979, c. 84; 1985, c.42.)
X33.1-23.4, Allocation of construction funds within
secondary system. -- A,, B. [Repealed.]
C. Such funds as are allocated to the secondary
system of state highways pursuant to paragraph 3 of
subsection B of X33.1-23.1 shall be apportioned among
the several counties in the secondary system by the
C-3
O '" '~'
~ 50 ~"~ ~o o~'
a
0°a~ 9JGr ?r~" ~ ~y
off' °~ he 4J~ tee
~a~y ,~ e ~,~, op ~ a 3
°°Z eJ.~a OOH .(1C~ ,~~1 CJ
a°~ r a p a s 'o ~ 'o•~y
aOa ~~ Ga~ea 9JG~ ~, ate etGeO e °~ 'G`~
~O ~, O O CJ ~O
yo,~'~a~ ae a~ ~ ,ora ~etm~ ey~r~~ oJt~o a ~~ ~a
0 l o ~ e O~ a
5~a~,e 5ra~ o° t~ y node 1 i~r~ea o'~ ~r 3~ ea 1 ~ fi 5 5
ti~ t ° - ~ ~e F d a~ y2
G°J~ ~,Y'e o ti`p' a~ a bey~~ toe~~• a~' ~a~ t~5et~ p~~aat 2
,°o deal yoo oe got at`~ ,og ~ X14
00 ,~a~, e~~Y ,~,~e ,~yti L~ y p ~
~°~ o°~J ,°e8 '°`~ ea°y r~ ~~ t5 ,~ ytir ~ 1 g 5 ea b`~
~y~r ~e1gr tea` ~ a off- a ~ote9 ~aoil~ tet~l~
y~,o, ,, a to of oa e ae
be o~y°r ~ ,~~e a ,~ oat,~9 ateay a ~ mad ~ e L~
e aY a a t
~ eaJGea oa~~o~ ~ym1~at t m° ~ e ~ ,ata . ~ tr e ti~
t tia~e of o~ret atea, ° tat~o~ ~° ~eC~yo~ ccptalog
~ na 5~pr y~e5 y° StaJ~o°t ~ o ~ phi oula~~o~ a ~u1atL
o. o,.
a 5~uate m ~aY. a~a Jt oo S e ~ e 1the C ° e la~e5~ ~ o ,
~ Yi o ~a C tr t t e ~
tY'e ig °{ ire, yra,~l As tens°s o I~sti v
~ a'oyo~ yea ~~ 1°e MurnbY mo'~e teoent• n
"oooJl te5~ ~~L ~,~e Y Wh1CreveC i5 C SJb5eotlo
~Y'e ~.a awe of ~lt~y Funds unae or eX°eoti
5~1m ~3 ~~ a,~ln9 or°V ide f ement
e ~e~5~. dote ~, maY C eolac
v~y Be tir rs or ac
O• o~` reoai fr°m
yeG~,y ay~J7 wage Ces Jltln9 or va
i5 e~' a Goa
~Y' eX° Y,i aots of
eavY. ~Y ons r 42.1
ri GeSeatY ea~ret 145 ; ~ 9a5 ~ o •
e
~' e~ete ~ ~~a ~ co t
9 c• th un
1°~~~ ~ meetin9 wl h
~ ~1 __ T
1'~` roads •
X33 • -ntY of ea
ear o~'Verning body
~yX•`I 9°tc
,~ V ~'
Joe
5
~_4
~.> .~ a /
r
the secondary system may, jointly with the resident
engineer for the Department of Highways and
Transportation or other representatives of the
Department as designated by the State Highway and
Transportation Commissioner, prepare a six-year plan for
the improvements to the secondary road system in that
county. Each such six-year plan shall be based upon the
best estimate of funds to be available to the county for
expenditure in the six-year period on the secondary
system. Each such plan shall list the proposed
improvements, together with an estimated cost of each
project so listed. Following the preparation of the
plan, the board of supervisors or other governing body
shall conduct a public hearing after publishing notice
in a newspaper published in or having general
circulation in the county once a week for two successive
weeks, and posting notice of the proposed hearing at the
front door of the courthouse of such county ten days
before such meeting. At the public hearings, which
shall be conducted jointly by the board of supervisors
and the representative of the Department of Highways and
Transportation, the entire six-year plan shall be
discussed with the citizens of the county and their
views considered. Following such discussion, the board
of supervisors or other governing body, together with
the representative of the Department of Highways and
Transportation, shall finalize and officially adopt the
C-5
shall then be considered the
six_year plan which
official plan of the county.
each calendar year representatives
least once In In
At Transportation
the Department of Highways and
of of state highways In
charge of such secondary system
of the Qepartment
h county, or some representative
eac i hwaY and Transportation
the State H g
designated by of supervisors
with the board
shall meet Cegular or
Commissioner- of each county in a
overning body body
or other 9 board or other governing
meeting of such for the
special a budget
for the purpose of Preparing fiscal
for the next
funds
improvement of Highways
expenditure of
of the Department
representative th e b oar d o f
year. The
Transportation shall furnish
the
and estimate of funds and
with an updated Department of
supervisors of the
board and the representative prepare the
and Transportation shall jointly
Highways out in that fiscal year
list of Projects to be carried
r plan by order of priority, and
from the six-yea _ State Highway
taken of the
following generally the Policies
mmission in regard to the statewide
and Transportation ~O Such list of Priorities
s stem improvements. publ i c hearing duly
secondary Y at a
shall then be Presented
nce with the Procedure hereinbefore
advertised in accorda
nts of citizens shall be obtained an
and comme hearing , the board ,
outlined, public
Following this of th e
considered. the representative
with the concurrence of
C-6
,..~, __I
~C ~..} j"
Department of Highways and Transportation, shall adopt,
as official, a priority program for the ensuing year,
and the Department of Highways and Transportation shall
include such listed projects in its secondary roads
budget for the county for that year.
At least once every two years, following the
adoption of the original six-year plan, the board of
supervisors or other governing body of each county,
together with the representative of the Department of
Highways and Transportation, shall update the six-year
plan of such county by adding to it and extending it as
necessary so as to maintain it as a plan encompassing
six years. Whenever additional funds for secondary road
purposes become available, the governing body may
request a revision in such six-year plan in order that
such plan be amended to provide for the expenditure of
such additional funds. Such additions and extensions to
each six-year plan shall be prepared in the same manne r
and following the same procedures as outlined herein for
its initial preparation. Where the board of supervisors
or other governing body and the resident engineer or
other representative of the Department of Highways and
Transportation fail to agree upon a priority program,
the board or governing body may appeal to the State
Highway and Transportation Commissioner. The
Commissioner shall consider all proposed priorities and
render a decision establishing a priority program based
C.~ 7
~ ~ `,.~ S r,.~` ,,:
upon a consideration by the Commissioner of the welfare
and safety of county citizens. Such decision shall be
binding.
All such six-year plans shall consider all existing
roads in the secondary system, including those in the
towns located in the county that are maintained as part
of the state secondary system, and shall be made a
public document. (Code 1950, §33.1-70; 1970, c. 322;
1977, c. 578; 1979, c. 64; 1981, c. 240).
§33.1-71. Annual statement concerning improvements
to be filed with county governing bodies. -- The
Department of Highways and Transportation shall within a
reasonable time after the close of each fiscal year file
with each of the several boards of supervisors or other
governing bodies of counties a statement setting forth:
(a) each highway, designated by number, located in the
county upon which improvements were made during such
fiscal year, (b) the amount expended for improvements on
each such highway during such fiscal year, and ( c) the
nature of such improvement. (Code 1950, §33-47.1; 1958,
c. 317; 1970, c. 322.)
2.3 VDH&T Policy
C-8
~. ~~ ,
/ f
VIRGINIA
DEPARZMENT OF HIGHWAYS AND TRANSPORTATION
GUIDE FOR
SECONDARY ROAD IMPROVEMENTS
~. -:r
C-9
....
5--.
VDH&T GUIDE
FOR
SECONDARY ROAD IMPROVEMENTS
CONTENTS
I PURPOSE
II PHILOSOPHY
A. Ge__, natal
B, Basic Philosophies
1. New ds
2, New Plant Mix
3, Stagy S
III BALANCED PROGRAM
A, Goals
B, Determination of Actual Needs
1, Inventory of Needs
2, New Surface Treatment
3, Reconstruction of Hardsurface Roads
4, Reconstruction of Nonhardsurface Roads
5. Brims Revlacement
6. Railroad Grade Crossing Protective Devices
C, On~oin4 Program
1, protect Development
2, Present Status
PAGE
1
2
2
2
2
2
3
4
4
4
4
S
5
6
6
6
6
6
8
C-lU
CONTENTS (Continued)
IV SPECIAL-FUNDED PROGRAMS
A• Federal Safet
Pro ram
B• Federal Aid Seco
ndar Pro ram
C• Off-S stem and S
afer Roads Demonstrat
D• Federal Brid a Re
lacement Pro ram
E• District Brid
e Fund
F' N_ a-Pro rams "
V RIGHT OF WAy
VI DETAILS OF PLAN PREPARATION
A• Items for
Inclusion
B• Plan Format
C• Reference Material
~XX~cxxxxxx~Xxxxx
am
PACE
9
9
9
9
9
10
10
11
12
12
12
13
. f~
C-11
VDN&T GUIDE
FOR THE DEVEg~ YEAR pIANSOripARY SYSTEM
I - PURPOSE
artment engineers and
This document is being distributed to provide Dep
overning officials with an official reference that emb1niasDepart-
local g ractices, and procedures of the Virg'
philosophies, policies, p out the objectives of
ment of Highways and Transportation in carrying with regard
Section 33.1-70.01 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended,
lan of each county in the Secondary System.
to the six-year p
Section 33.1-70.01, places
including overning
The enactment of House Bill 1041, between the local g
hasis on the cooperative relatioation of six-year improvement
much emP artment in the promulg
stem of each respective county.
bodies and the Dep
plans and annual budgets on the Secondary sy
De artment recognizes its responsibilii~safullucapabilitiestarefthus
The P
compliance of the objectives of the aw.
pledged to this effort.
•n an manner detract from nor conflicari lmanagementtof the
This does not 1 y the control, supervision,
Section 33.1-69.1 vesting artment, it
stem in the Department is still in effect. While Section
Secondary sy
33.1-69.1 places the ultimate lond33~1170nOlaforothe cooperative develop-
is still compatible with Sec
ment of the six-year plans and annual budgets.
ated that the Department will have to exerromising con-
It is not anticip
authority except in Vethatavirtuallycall situations cancbepamicably worked
troversy. It is felt arties.
out to the mutual satisfaction of both P ear plan
lishin work set forth in the sixrerogative
The method or means of accon-nd suchgdecisions are within the p
falls within this concept, ust what work
f the Department. The Department will therefore determine within the
0 olicies j
many constraints and limitations traetheetcaWSasnwell as determine which
will be done by State forces, con
type of funding is applicable to each item.
1 merit or having little chance of culmonetito develop
Projects of doubtfu Once
not be included in the plan due to the wasted from thenPlan. y
a project to a given stage only to be dropp the fate of a project should
initiated, any subsequent decision concerning such waste to a
ossible time in order to keep artment approval, a
be made at the earliest p
minimum. After having proceeded as far as officiei Deof no return except
project would beteoinstancesto have reached the p
in rare and remo
C-12
-z-
II - PHILOSOPHY
A. General
It is the philosophy of the Department to provide a
balanced improvement program on the Secondary System
gorical as well as geographical standpoint.
~.z~~_~
countywide
from a cate-
Statewide needs are so vast that practically every county has a long-
standing backlog in each category sufficient to develop a comprehen-
sive six-year improvement plan that addresses balancing along both
concepts. It is not envisioned that there will be an equally dividing
up of improvement funds among magisterial districts annually. Rather,
it is expected that the countywide situation will be reasonably
balanced commensurate with respective total needs over the six-year
span of the plan.
In determining the total Secondary needs of each county, towns of
under 3,500 population operating under Section 33.1-79 or 33.1-82 must
be given fair consideration. These streets are just as much a part of
the overall Secondary System as rural roads. Therefore, their needs
are to be considered in the overall program within the proper
perspective in setting the priority of improvements.
In the development of a realistic plan, it is necessary to exercise
good discretionary judgment. For instance, one area may have an
imbalance of a particular need category while another area may be
top-heavy in a different one. This presents an opportunity to put
strong emphasis on satisfying each one's specific need while still
being compatible with a balanced program from both standpoints. Needs
of long standing should be given preference to late-budding ones.
B. Basic Philosophies
1. New Roads (Other than Rural Additions)
Section 33.1-70.01 addresses the application of the six-year plan
to all existing roads in the Secondary System. Accordingly, it is
the sense of the Department that Secondary improvement funds not
be used for the establishment of any new roads except rural
additions. There is currently such a tremendous need on the
existing system that all funds for the foreseeable future must be
utilized to the extent that they will satisfy this need. This
does not apply to relocated sections on the existing system even
in situations where it is necessary to continue to maintain the
old road.
2. New Plant Mix
Plant mix overlays are generally thought of as resurfacing items.
However, there are instances where plant mix overlays are
C-13
- 3 - ~ ~ ~ ~ _._/
classified as improvements. Two examples:
(a) New plant mix on roads that did not previously have
a plant mix surface (constitutes surface-type
improvement).
(b) Overlay of greater than 115~~/sq.yd. (which consti-
tutes a strengthening of pavement, thereby
increasing load capacity).
3, Staff S
All improvements included in the plan are to be constructed to the
appropriate geometric standards; i.e., VDH&T GS-3, AASHTO Design
Guide for Local Roads and Streets, Part I, or AASHTO Design Guide
for Other than Freeways, etc.
C-14
,.,.
III - BALANCED PROGRAM
A. Goals
There are Department goals of long standing for the Secondary improve-
ment program as follows, and these are to be addressed in each county
six-year plan:
1, Provide a hardsurface of width and strength adequate for
traffic volumes served on all roads carrying SO or more vpd,
2. Provide an all-weather stone or gravel surface on all roads
in the 10-50 vpd range.
3, Provide a light stone or gravel surface on all roads carrying
less than 10 vpd. '
4. Bring all bridges of less than ten-ton capacity up to stand-
ard.
To this list can be added additional goals for carrying out new
programs; i,e,
5, Provide grade separation or automatic signalization at all
railroad grade crossings.
6. Reduce high-hazard locations and eliminate roadside obstacles
to the extent of funding provided for these special funds.
• B. Determination of Actual Needs
1. Inventory of Needs
The six-year plan shall be a real and factual financial plan based
• on anticipated construction funds for the six-year plan. The
Department maintains an inventory of needs as determined by an
evaluation of all roads in the 1976 Secondary Needs Study. It
will be a requirement that any proposed improvement in the six-
year plans be listed in the county's inventory of needs.
Although the inventory of needs is developed through the tolerable
• and nontolerable rationale, it does not preclude the classifica-
tion of a particular road as nontolerable due to its status
within a county's comprehensive plan. Such rationale will, of
course, require full explanation, and keen discretion must be
exercised lest some critical need be needlessly delayed in the
priority-setting process.
This places extreme importance upon the credibility of the
inventory of needs, and it is imperative that it be kept current
through a continuing procedure of revision as conditions change,
C-15
- 5 -
.'' y r'
F° _.
ear plan preparation.
rior to the six-y cater to
with a critical review P rocedure for the comp as changes
We will therefore initiate a P eriodically
receive and print out the revisedneert P
are reported by the resident eng'
2, New Surface Treatment
d is required of a road to be
traffic count of SO vp irrespective
A minimum There are
eligible for new surface treatmenn thislcategoryeS, ualify-
of the magnitude of the backlog
over 4,000 miles of currently untrea~tmentadoestnot accede to the
ing under this standard, so the Dep
surface-treating of any roads below this count except under
extremely extenuating circumstances.
riorities for new surface treatment should begowever,
Generally, P
established in directhereation to the relative tra tare not
in it would be prudent to deviate some-
there are instanractice. Some instances include, bu
what from this p
limited to: be prohibitively
her priority road may
(a) The cost of the hig
high and not commensurate with service.
(b) Necessity to balance the program geographically
Right of way more readily available on a lesser road
~c) that
gee other factor beyond control of VDH&T and county
(d) her priority road
_ delays a hig
enhances adjacent properties, and
New surface treatmsurfaceatreatment projects occur on roads
virtually all new Therefore, it is reasonable
serving predominantly local traffiht of way be a contingency to
and a requirement that donated rig
the application of new surface treatment. es to
reclude the actual payment for damag
This concept does not p h sical improvements or
the residue property and loss of p y
shrubbery.
3, Reconstruction of Hardsurface Roads
main concern with presently surface-trroblems nor oftenfety.
us p
The
There is not the usThereforernneeds must be evaluatedTheth
riding qualities. strength, and gradient.
runent, a lied with regard to width
regard to width, alig uite easily PP uire
tolerable criteria areri ent and gradient evaluation req
and strength, but alig th section of surface-
considerably more judgment. A leng y th but has
treated road may be tolerable for width and streng
L-16
- 6 -
radient.
isolated short sections °wholessection wou~d betshown to be
ro ose spot improve-
In such an instance, t e
nontolerable, but the solution would be to pcorrection.
ments only on the sections actually needing
Whatever the type and extenelesstvalideand shouldtbegconsidered
face roads, they are noneth
in the overall improvement program.
4, Reconstruction of Nonhardsurface Roads
This category of need is one that causes a great deal of
with the public. They are not eligible for
misunderstanding ranted that the
surface treatment, but it is °rovementeconstitutes a comQnitment
programming of any type of imp
for surface treatment. It has tt beualifysfordsurface treatment,
will never carry enough traffic q
and to adequate
so improvements must be conserefore be witharegn to the traf is
served. Evaluations must th alignment, and gradient for
stabilization, as well as width,
that traffic.
5. Br= dge Replacement ublic as
This is a category that is not nearl~e h sical restrict ion
others, unless there happens to be s p y uentl use it.
that is objectionablea~tmentsmustoassumefthe leadyin determining
Consequently, the Dep
e needs and apprise the boards of the severity o
critical bridg o ular with
the situations. Bridge replacements are not very p P
`' ~''~~''~'~~'- so both the Department and the boards have a
the public, or its rightful consideration
responsibility to give this categ y
in the six-year plan.
6, Railroad Grade Crossin Protective Devices
that needs special consideration due to the
This is a category ation to utilize special Federal
safety aspect and therescrgbed by Congress.
funds in the manner p
C~ (lnooinQ Program
1, Proiect Development
The development of an average Federal Aid project requires
ears from inception to the advertisement
approximately five y crated into three basic stages
stage. The time frame can be sep
intermediate, and final.
of initial,
The initial stage includes theteubtoWard developmentlfromtaating
the project and is the fpreliminary engineering, including
scheduling standpoint.
C-17
_,_
ment, is included in this
surveys and tentative plan develop „red_tape" notices that
There are also early Federal
stage- the initial stage.
would be classified in
e includes the environmental sand develop-
ediate stag ro ect approval,
The interm hearing requirements, P j
fulfilling ht of way stage.
ment of plans to the rig right of
the finalizing of the plans,
The final stage includes
the advertisement to contrac .
way acquisition, and
outline demonstrates the lengthy time frame
e-time then
The following to leng
volved. 'The times indio~tcontrpVe sialzissuesrtend es due
in unusual of the lead tim
segments, so any There is some overlap
the overall process. ment of some phases, but times shown for
to the. concurreaccumulative.
the stages are
Initial Staff (31 m°nths)
(a)
1, Submittal of SR-1
nment of project number ment system
(a, Assig ro ect on develop
three (b. Inclusion of p j
months (c. Analysis of SR 6
2, Inclusion on 105 or TIP
14 months)
Authorization and completion of survey (
3. field
lan preparation and preliminary
4, Tentative p
study (5 months)
5, Request EIS (1 month)
6, Soil survey (4 months)
Request bridge plans if applicable
7.
Intermediate Stake (19 months)
(b)
1, EIS (7 months)
Public hearing requirement (2 months)
2.
3, Field inspection (1 month)
ment and project approval
4, Further plan develop
(5 months) Wa
Plan finalization and submittal to Right of Y
5~ (4 months)
C-18
"~' __
~. s'~
~~,.
$ -
(c) Final Staff (14 months)
Prenegotiation report and right of way appraisal
1.
(5 months)
letion of bridge plans if applicable
2. Comp
(26 months total time)
reements, RR, etc., if applicable
3. Special ag
(6 months)
2, Present Status ro ect
of an ongoing program with p j
artment is in the midst u on the financial
The Dep de ending P ~ese current
development at various stages, P ear plans.
artment engineers as a result of
commitment within the ced bytDeP _y ublic input under the
plans have been develop in response to p onsiveness
applying their technology lans do represent a resp
old system. Therefore, these p rocess of satisfying
orderly P are compatible
_ to public desire and demo catabili y. As such, they
needs within the funding P
with the new law.
strongly urged that the raaiWhentconsidering~ation
It is therefore weighe
from the present plans be carefully outline, the dropping of a
changeS• As can be discerned fre iably into the initial stage
project that has progressed app overall program.
would cause a like delay in the
C-19
,s a
- 9 -
IV - S PECIIIL-FUNDED PROGRAMS
eciall funded programs, particularly Federal
There are several sp Y the counties in
programs, whe~hbSectionu33Slh23e4band aretreflectedmingthe SecatdOnyof
accordance wi artment has the oblig
construction allocation of eacrescribedemanner, and each county must share
utilizing these funds in the p
in the commitment to the individual programs as well as share in t e
receipt of the funds.
A, Federal Safety Program
ro ram for the most part embraces three types of safety con-
This p g such as high-hazard locations,
siderations on Federal Aid Systems, hwa rade crossings. Each of
roadside obstacles, and railroad-hig y g
these types of situations must belsa~ofbelgivenstoerailroad-highway
year plans, and special emphasis
grade crossing signalization. Each county will have to commit an
amount to this program that is at least equal to the amoulex Federal
received through this particular source. Due to the comp artment
hase of the improvement program, the Dep
criteria for this p ro ects to utilize
must assume a dominant role in the selection of p j
these funds.
g. Federal Aid Secondary Program
an on oing program that requires close monitoring by the
This is g Therefore, the
Secondary Roads Division on a statewide basis. rero ative of
selection of projects for FAS funding will remain the p g
the Department. However, FAS projects may be selected from aointf the
~•-''~'~ ories, so this will not have any effect on the j
various categ
priority selection between ttmeDtpexercisingditseprerogativetofecomes
simply a matter of the Depar ro riate amount
implementation. chedulednoverlthetlongfrun,have an app P
of FAS projects s
C, Off-S stem and Safer Roads Demonstration Pro ram
This program is applicable to those rramsandtisnlike aeaombinationnof
It is, however, a Federal-funded grog t being applicable to the
the FAS and Federal safety program excep lied.
Off System. Consequently, the same rationale is app
D. Federal Bridge Replacement Program
ro ram is unlike the other Federal programs in that
This particular p g et been distributed in any manner to
the Federal funds have not as y
ecific
individual counties. A designaredSastemttofbe allocated tonsil is se
aside for the statewide Second riorit order as established by FHWA
eligible Secondary projects in p y
criteria.
C-2 0
- to -
basis. There-
The funding is on a 75% Federal and 25%eSonttheaprogram must arrange
y county able bridg
fore, an with an elig' et at the time the
for its 25% matching from its construction bathe county would stand to
Otherwise, riority Secondary
Federal funds will be available.
lose the 75% Federal funds in defebenlocated.e next p
bridge regardless of where it may
,,~,
E, District Brid e Fund
S00 000 of Secondary constructi~h $100S000ebeingaside and
Each year $ ~ e Fund, wi
designated as the District Bridg
appropriated to each construction district.
'ective of this fund is to assist in financing particularly
The °b~ es that would otherwise be too much b Theefun stare
expensive bridg articular .county. a in his
sneer to any such Secondary bridg
regular construction funds of a P Roads
assigned by the district eng' royal by the Secondary
district, and this is subject to aPpecially beneficial to some counties
Engineer. This Program has been esp
small allocations, and the new law allows for its continuation.
with
F. Ne= rg_ams from
ro rams, continue to develop
ro rams, particularly Federal P g t the six-year plan to take
New p g
time to time, so it ironramssnot now evident.
advantage of future p g
C-21
i .~ ~ ~ ---
11 -
~ - RIGHT OF WAY
urchase and/or eminent
ht of way may be obtained via donatiotherroad involved.
Rig u on the character of of at
ending P ht of way width
domain, dep olicy, a rig
uirement of Commission P obtained prior CO the initiation
As a minimumfeet, plus easements, must be
least forty rovement.
of any new imP wa is to be
local traffic, the right of y
redominantly es of improvements not
to the other tyP ,.New Surface Treat-
If a road serves P This refers location
obtained by donation.
ed in bridge replacement on ne~o donating
ver this reference ubeewhere section entit a not agree
co ould
ment." An exception w ro erty owners woul enhance the
needed but the p P articularly a for the
was critically Such an instance does note~issible to p y
the right of way' character.
ro erty, so it is reasonablebenlocal in
adjacent P peven though the road may be
right of way the right of way may
through traffic, This
redominantlyh eminent domain as necessary. there
When a road serves P uired throug ht of way in instances where
purchased and/or acq owners.
however, preclude donated rig of the property
does not, the desire
is an indication that such is
-<~~•..
C-22
~ ~,~ .'.w _~. _. ~
12 -
VI - DETAIL OF PIAN PREPARATIOy
Items for Inclusion combined construction and
A• total of
2% county or the construction o
l• Rural additions rovide f course of the six-year
allocations tthroughout the additions, so the
maintenance additions on rural
eligible rural law has no effect
plan. The new the same.
Oo~,ission's policy remains and unforeseen
on and seedingan or conuni.t
sneering, fertiliz impractical to p ited to
Preliminary eng• Viand will be lim
2. for which i.t is o -tional, of each county..
incidental itemsadvance. This is P allocation
funds so far in° of the construction
of 13 /. o tional and is
a maximum also be P It is
This item shall allocation.
Plant mix surfacing. ° of the construction a substantial
of 5/° schedule
3. limited to a maximum counties which but are unable to
devised for those each year ected that
expressly lant mix It i.s not exp
amount of construction P far in advance. this entry.
outes will need to use
identify specific r
counties with little such work
t strengthening, and/or widening
~. Bridge rePlacemen >
5. New surface treatment
hardsurface roads
6. Reconstruction of existing
roads
~, Reconstruction of nonhardsurface
e crossing elimsnatson or signalization
~~- ~:: ". ~ g, Railroad grad character
then items that are improvement in
Numerous o of the plan, and
9• an integral part aced and
terns are these be anticip ossible•
construction.l artment that sofar as p
Incidental of the Dep the plan ose of providing
it is the intent entries in the Purp
identified as individual unforeseen situations.
ide entry is strictlian°to cover
The countyw the P is aPPllcable
sufficient flexibility in construction items
ill be necessary to identify and
e of entry for the incidental
This tYP ear plan. It will st l budget.
only to the six-y in the annua
describe these individually
ell as
B. plan Format and comprehensive as w
complete, It is therefore
lan must be accurate, to another. le for the hypotheti.-
Each P format from one county of the camp entries for
consistent in format along that to illustrate
requested that the sample was devised It is not all-inclusive,
cal county be used. The
ome of the typical types of improvements.
s
C-2 3
13
_`a ....
..~' ..~~' ,~ w:
situations that will
different the ones Preparing
so no doubt there are many other tions by
e uire innovative and original descrip
r q of providing
the Pla°' hasize the necessity of work as
e and e
lan we wish to emp scoP
the P tion of the tyP which work is
In preparing descrip and manner in tances
comprehensive fitment in ins
a full and roposed financial cO1~'n' ears . Thereafter , ore than
well as the p an item aPP over a period of m
to be done the first yeWill be financed ation necessary t°
items only that inform It will,
where particular suffice to enter original entry- of the
one year, it will back to its summary
the item and refer a complete status
identify to show .'Remarks" column.
however, be necessary in the
at that time range plan, and
financing any long- will be the
lement tO simplicity
is an essential supplans. Here, ding t° the
A marked map these P each accor
be required with to mark roposed~ and nO
one will be satisfactory the work is P than the
.It will when tself other
objective. color coding to show the map i ork~
following eed be shO`''~ ono f the prop°sed w
narrative description n the year
necessary legend to identify
Yellow
First year Violet
Second year Red
Third year Blue
Fourth year Green
Fifth year Brown
.. .:'
Sixth year on regarding
e furnished by separate communicati
Specific data will b
projected allocations.
Reference Material
C.
Definition °f terms (attached)
on file in residency office)
1.
2. County inventory of needs (
'on of tolerable standards (attached)
g, Tabulate office)
le plan (on file in residency office)
4. Samp on file in residency
Geometric construction standards (
5, and Streets
n Guide for Local Roads.
(a) ~~`T GS_3 Desig Other than Freeways
(b) AASHTO Geometric Design Guide for
(c) ~SHTO Geometric
Public hearing procedure (attached)
6.
C_24
,,~.~<~ ;
,; ~ ..,.
~'' ~' ._
~'
DEFINITION ~F TERMS
the capability revail_
tolenabl ofl service for the P
articular usageble level
Toff r ad tospnovide a neasona do not have
tho$e which
section a applies to In this
ing traffic• of service. from the word
nontolerabl e level ti of these so_labeled
~Onversely~ neasonabl differen
enable. oviding a .. should be ny ow the
the capabil th term "non er lly means u able even tho gh much bel
vernacular ~~ whlc co t~nue to be bear
~~intolerable~ ds in mind that a
noa
nOntolerable must be kept ° classified.
be s t width or
desired. to tolenability~ standards tO av asn nOntolerable.
the test as um tolerable such as P d
In apply tnmeet all the any ~ e or more L r to be class ore cOnslderations an
us
If it is deficient lnor gnadient~ t in any one or n'
tunent o be cien e-
en th, alig ise defi been som
stn g might likew enable. e
ontol these terms Y`av
Bridge se considered n acular the capacity ent and
. likeWi In our vern noves novem
on.
t - ~Onstructfore, any work d be onsider f them gnltude of the
Im rovemen .there oul •
what synonym ofsany road do r pnogr m irrespective sm
convenient the construe of suet' all
are those which are
included in within one
ents accomplished such as
novem d s
work. minor imp d an item
1. Incidental that they can be finan de spot safety verticals or
magnitude Some examples inc cutting down h ons of rel°cation
cal y vet
ear. al cu lses' sh°rt d ctiwith cul ts' ld be
fis hting horizontons, °lated bri ges These w°u ect
daylig intersects of small etc. than PrO~
ction ~ reFlac~ent on of guar n~bers rather
improving installati
onstru et item
th
plant mix sthe budget wi budg be
ed in e t° have th more
label of a magnitud
.. numbers. and r n d and the fund-
ents are ear
or major imPnovem more than a y are assig
2. pno ect a period pnoject n~bers lan.
anted ovee t ear P
time for Pr°gra~own in the siX"y
ing c°mmitm
C_2 5
PUnLIC tIEARING PROCEDURE
ervisOrs or
33.1-70.01 reads the plan, the hearing aft r Pub ula
al cir tion
$ecti°n aration conduct a public ever
the Prep having g osting
~~Following body shall bushed in °r ve weeks and pourthouse
otheno °vicerin a cewa week for two the front door t e public beari ge'
d
iugthe county °n °$ed Bearing at meeting• AC supervisors un, the
the P before such e board of s enstati the
tice °f rop days tl by th s and Tran P of
coun y ten hw y tiz
of .ch shall be f ahe Departmedisc sled with the ci
representative lan shall be d.~~ be a ~°int
ere
entire a d their views c°nsld t the public h nt'ing 1 it fs not specific
county and the DeQartn'e d oru other g°verning
boar at the boar
,on clearly s the late dsth th
This se have effort of except tO say conducting
s or
e
Wit regard ubllst' t e notices. e manner and county u d Pending e ora
shall P tate th t to verbatim
coun y a 1
body t will be trade ~ °~ Y vary ao° s wish tO artme t persOh Bea i g•
N° attemP itself. Th artment DeP eac
hearing e. Tt'e Dep e. Therefore e recording ° these except in
the ~ referenc or its fil scary tap scribe el take
o er
each s P roceedings f have the neCe essary t tra artment P so cording'
of tBe p ents tO t be nec that Dep t the re b the
Crake ar of en isioned tBa lllbe necessary e to supplemi agreed uP° to a
I ayes instances , s fort heir own re shall be as m~ the Code r t e the detail to
r t notes the minutes AlthOUg to as ent will
sufficier ofd the Debartment• of stiPula e tithe elem
dissemination an ~~ it does n that tB it will be
,~•~ .:.-','. ='. The vidual b°ards +'entire plan It is obvi°us •~ere fore' ublic for a
~ndi ion °f the trust be. ed discussion•able t° the P As a uniform
why h the t an intri a and make the Pla o f the tearing e~sllf .
st=
not perms reQ e e in advance ty shall P be
ar tuni lan would
necessary to eriod °f tim DPP°r ear P
reasonable the following advance t of the six-ys office dur erg
draf clerk od
Procedures that t and the coun i for the two-week P
noti itself
ce office tBe pubs
in the dency
publish in the resi s fo to ufl he hearing- blights
display busines t big
normal hO"rs rlor to the da explanation th Che opening uP
ermlt an intr°ductory d allow for th regard tO
immediately P wool wi
ould P lan and ublic desires
r°cedure w Dints °f the t at the p n.
his ost Pertinent t the extent out of the Pla location °f the
ofe he dal ftemsnwithin or left will take pourth° s °r board meeting
individu hearings c
d that the most likely the
Ztsi e fve boards choosing
re P
room.
C_2 6
~ ~,r ~ ..
VIRGINIA
DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS & TRANSPORTATION
TOLERABLE STANDARDS
FOR
DETERMINING SECONDARY INVENTORY OF NEEDS
Traffic Surface
Count Base
Width T e
Traffic VPD
Light surface
Grou 12 ft.
00 - 02 p - 24 All-weather surface
14 ft.
03 & 04 25 - 49 paved surface
16 ft.
04 - 06 51 - 399 Paved surface
lg ft.
07 & OS Opp _ 999 paved surface
11
1,000 - 3,999 20 ft.
paved surface
09 -
13 4,000 - 5,999
22 ft.
Paved surface
12 & 24 ft.
14 6,000 - 7,499 lane with
Multi.
25 ft. paved surface
19
7,500 & over
15 -
x~""'°c
c-2 ~
[ I yrm.p ~t1
~. f
ATTACHMENT D 1987
DECEMBER 15-
LIST OF MAPS D_45
PAGES D-1 thru
PAGE N0. Route 793.
D-1. Artrip Lane- 670.
goad, Route
D-2• Lost Mountain 883•
to
Ridge Driver Rou
175 -
D-3•
-4. Penguin Drive, Route
D Route 720•
D-5• Colonial Avenue,
to 720.
-6. Colonial Avenue, Rou
D to 608•
Road- Rou
Chapel Road- Route 614.
D-7• Ringsmen
D-8. Boones 615.
D-9. Webb Roadr Route
Route 677.
Road,
D-10. Willow Branch
691•
to
D-11• DawnwOOd Road- Rou
- o kins Road Route 915.
D-12. Cox H p to 601•
Road- Rou
D-13. Old Hollins
to 613.
D-14• Merriman Road- Rou
to 615-
D-15• Starlight Lane- Rou
to 622.
D-16. Bradshaw Road, Rou
Route 623•
D-17• Florist Road-
to 626•
D-18. Thirlane Road- RO vote 62
8.
D-19• W°odhaven road, R
to 628.
-20• WpOdhaven Road, Rou
D to 633.
D-21. $enOis Road- ROU Route 636.
reek Road-
D-22. Glade C to 639•
-23. HarbOrw°od Road- Rou
D to 639•
-24• Riverside Driver Rou
D
1 ~Z. -~ .._. ,~
D_25• Dry Hollow Road, Route 649.
D-26. Winter Drive, Route 657.
D-27. Bandy Road, Route 666.
D-28. Yellow Mountain Road, Route 668.
D_29, Yellow Mountain Road, Route 668.
D-30. Roselawn Road, Route 689.
D-31. Colonial Avenue, Route 720•
D-32. Old Mill Road, Route 752•
D-33. Janee Drive, Route 651.
D-34. Olsen Road, Route 768•
D-35. Cove Road, Route 780•
D-36. Ogden Road, Route 867•
D-37. Crystal Creek Road, Route 897.
D-38. Crystal Creek Road, Route 897•
D-39. Starkey Road, Route 904.
D-40. Burnt Quarter Drive, Route 1083.
D-41. Cresthill Drive, Route 1658.
D-42. Olsen Road, Route 768•
D-43. Barrens Road, Route 1832.
D-44. Verndale Drive, Route 1867.
D_45. Bunker Hill Drive, Route 1602.
f f"'- x'141
I',
II
5 n ac lDl
5 B5 pc1Cl
.-~~:
~'~I ~ 13
II X;~` ~
~ _J
I,
'I ~\
41 '~~ )
~: .~. .:
~ 39. 38y; 37 '
HI I L•
s 44 45 * 4b
--a
-~
/ 13
/ SE3'~c~p ,~ 29
a78ac1U g4`at
._ i ~ ez 83 .•,.
~_ ~ i °~
Artrip Lane, Route 793
DEPAR`rMENT OF
FUE3LIC F1~CILI'I'IES D_1
i 01»ac
r - ,
}
~' `~ r 4
/ I D6AC k
41 l
TT ~.5~
I J9Af~ ' '
/ 2
i iOAC ~ ~
a3
:5 ~
~/ /46 ~ r
6
. 47 ,~ ~I
/ 8 9-. 48
J
I~i ~
,, ' 4 `0 \.
,~ O - / .
~ / ~ 91
/ / ~ ,
I 63 Z ,
Z ~ 64
i /
P /
W /
9
~ \\~ 69a .,~f 67C\~, ,6~
~ V~C~OC'~\ O ~yl~a(MGES MILL
~~ rr(~ .. ~.~ v~ `fit
'AO ® ~.
~~ • ~
•'. ' VICINITY MAP ,~~ ~
Rt 694
i
~7:q
\\
/ ~ 5
/`\ 5 70Ac
/ ~~
;~ a
~~ 550 4c
3
g 79 Ac
•
•'
29
2oa, ~'~.
~\ / 28
\~ 127A:
8
4 g5 A:
N
NORTH
/ ~ ~ '? ~ J.
f _ 3,
~ 72
32 .., ~
~. 1
3. e
35 e~~ \ 39 ~~•
~ ,
3G ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ \ 37 \. `~i j ~ 42 \.
~~
_ ~ Ac \•, 36 ,
/~' 43\~
l •,
/ \ a8
~ ~; ~~~
.\ / a4 /
27
9
6 g ~p Ac
9 40 Ac
Rt 670
O
13 \
5i3Ac
4~.
26 ~~~ 25 ~'SZ
~ 45
~• ~ ~ ~ ,.
t 46 O ~/ 53 -
.Y
Y ~ /
F
\b q~
Sa~AC,C., .,_~ ~ ~
g9~Ac 1. $~ 24
2 23Ac
I~ ~ 6
', .36AC C,'
-- 23
~ ~1
22
~~ ~ ~~ 73eA_
i
i ~ _ 20 I
12 1
2 zd A: l
. ~ 1 ~iA
~ 21 .
,~ ~~ ti
~.
1
\~/ I~
H ~oA:
/ DEPARTMENT OF Lost 1vlountain Road, Route 670
pUE3LIC FACILITIES D-2
r ~ ~ / •~
/ ' ' • ,
wr
\\ / ~~ •w / u•r
1
~
/
~ O tl
/
A
• a~ .dr
r M,•
I.Ai••.
.r ~ ~
l ~ °~
~ r
l~ r
\
i •
~ /
.i ~ ~
....
n
i ~ / , ~
' w
4 ~
~ ,
~ ,
..-
yY
,
w
' ^- ~ ~
w
~
NORTH
,w VICINITY MAP
~~
/L•. 316 Ac
~
27
~_ ~ 1.58At
'e^
34 2.14 Ac 3I 1 / ` ~ 62
35 1.75 At
o / °' "
\ ~ ~ 43At
d.• / 22 5 .
~
- / ~ 1.98Ac ,~
4
2.00 Ac (a
/ 2 20AclG _ 6
39 38 _ •..
21
-.
„
~~ 15.60 Ac 5.22 Ac 36 / 4 4 ?
_ 3
199 Ada 2a 2O
222Ac(C) 1.90 Ada I pOpc ~ LOI Ac
L62Ac(G
25 19 6
/
45 I.COAce ~ 104AC 1.24Ac l:
37
•
~
_
• a* ~ m
~/ n
43
26
18
1 ~
IOOAda ,
~ I OOAC ~
°
106 Ac
a ,"
/ 83Ad
i
;
~ ~ i 40
~
27
~ 17 •:
4
`
41 179 AC / [
L00 Ac LOOAc
42
4T 46 45 > 44 r .43 -
1 \
~ 1 ,c
.
1.46Ac
~- i4. t-•~
/ 2
A 42 28 16
1
c
2
/ Rt. 62 3 2 IBAc
~ ~~~ 2,OpAc 1.09Ac
15
>i 1.20Ac1D1
? ~ "°~
O99ActC)
• 2. p,c~) I.OOAc
w~ ~
ya,
l
,w ~.,
. 6 T ~
41
e
B
i / /
~
•, /
~ 5 51 / Z
~~
56 55
j ~
279 Ac ~ p - 1.67Ac ~ / 32
\ + °~ /
B02Ac
49 II ° 0 39 ~ 29
'
,•
a
1clG 4.60At ~ ~
••
12
D 38
57 54 ~ 3D •
°
• 324 Ac1a `° ~ ~ .. 13 ~° a ;1 1
75A
'47 501~c 1p1 130Ac ( C) 203 Ac
5
C .08AClC)
..,
~ IOOAc
o 36
"
`
D ~
/ 2 03 Ac
3 4.5'; OOAc(Dl 15 I
.
i0 ~ " • t 90Ac ~.,
o, 44 i lC) 16 /
'6AC a 43
~` looaclo) ~
1.
a2
a" 0.69 Ac
3 ' / /
~ al ~ ,~
M G/
~ n
v /
/
3a
,
'`'u '
~ 1 ~ T 22 B ;% Vvpin° g78Ac lG / /
.w ~~ ~ ' ~Ok ~ ~
•
m / 10 50Ac
p+
2J
•893 ~ / / 14. 60 Ac
Q+ /1
T
~
.r ~~ ,~ 25 a
~
. 6 26
r.
rN .. ° 27 ?
r, u
DEPARTMENT OF Ridge Road, Route 883
PUBLIC FACILITIES
D-3
~osc ~~ `~~ ~P NlGL. ,iT / ..~ ~
,~T / .Syp/M;.XAV10'~NS -'I ,~Q tdy ,~;
Epp„ _ _ J Ci 11 ~r ~¢w,~ ~ dv£Si,vM1V6~ ~ ~ .
1~f~,1 IL . ~F;k, ~ w,/ 1t~N~scMOa ~ ~
1 ~ UN ` ~?•° F ,~ wwr~ ft' ;k I' NN FOREST p~ ~ ~ Jt
-121 , ~\~ ~, W• '~~ ~.$ ,~ •~~ ~ .ty, d'' _.r, ~}•. ' ~'
•i77~ Z'. • P
,~ s~_ ~ ; .~. ,~, a°.' ~` NORTH
f p, I ~ p-
I I~~_ 1',, (VICINITY MAP ~ • I _ _ z6 /
-- "-._ 26 it I ; l
29 Ic 30
;/ _ 27
r ~ ~~ 31~ _ z.„ ~J
~' 37 ~ ~ ~ I
r 28
~ 35 !~ .~ - 51 ~ e 2F
/ ~ 34 32 b9 °
r -- ~' ~~~ j~ 33 50. ~~~ ~ ~ `
- A ° ~ ~ wnne ~ ° ,, a~' z
0 13 r w. ~ 0°ve \ /• 49 e .d 30 \e ~,
12 , .~ ' 14 ~~ 15 16 - , 17° ~j f a - y. p9 /I
., J - ,. 9V ~ ~ 31
~~ ~~ z q z' <° 48
o` ""` ~~ ' ~ . ~°
/ w ~ n _
- ~ 43 ,- °' ~ 32
0'} to ... y .. , L., _ µ a`' r a7 - ~~
,° % c°j - z I
\ a e< I.
9 ~ « tir - as ,. ' s
ay a>
\ ' 9_~~ 81ue ~u / `z e< ,~ ~ 46 34 P
J 8 22 Y Cit / 0
. v a l r° - s~
. ~ , ~- e2 ~
' 7 „• 35 0~
°o ~ , oa0 .0'4 ~ v
6 ,. , ° / 15
5 '\ 38 + ' J ~.t
v 1Z ° /
.4 / ~,
39 , v ~ 16
• ~ ~- ` ` },
~ I / ~ 17 ~r
00 2 ~1 8p0 ~ ~~.
3 \/~ ~ 2.5 ~~ IB ~~
„-~ 26 0 °
/ /~ O° 24 'o~ °Ig r
~`~ 32 ~ ~ ,°z' 23
\ 30 ~ ~ ~ 20
'Vr 0.,. 26
,. / c
2Z 21
.~ ,y
~ 29 DD 3 . °~ ~ 3 % '
~~
DEPARTMENT OF Penquin Drive, Route 1752
1 PUBLIC FACILITIES D-4
1 c~nr
C~nry
13 Asseue0 n
I ~ I.OOAS101 Balub~~ Gowy1'
J ~.
a1 I00 A~
I O
14
II 1.03 AC
200 Ac.
p IS
1.03Ac
n ~x
9 ~
1.03 Ac
Mop 4Q 10
I °° 100'
5
8
2.2SAc.
~,. ~ _,.
~._ _
NORTH
17
24.48 ~
I
7 '
5.08 Ac.(01
3.66 Ac.lLl
R'
R
..
2~.
...._. ,
-°
t ~'_.._.
.-----
6~•
l
~• l0
677
0 6N
l_ ~
6 615
\ ~-
J ~ ' ~ g / NORTH
6N ~~
VICINITY MAP II
`~. ~ 4 '• • R, 900 a
iAAC ' 9aac i / i2\` 6 25AC I
58 AC -" \ 5
6 , --~-~ ~ 13 ~\ } 69AC
3i
5739AC101 ~ 443 AC ~ \
71 i sac ~ \ 7 12 i9ACIDl~
a 92 oc ~ 10 8 1562 ac
i / ~ ~ . 'S6 ac SCI
~ ;^58 Ac ~ g
~~ ~" SOCAC ~\
! i ~ ~ .16 ~~1 14
18 IS ~615AC ~
T
32 SBAC I7 2000 AC
~ t7~ AC
. rl 7.2 F
~ 348 AC `4~ \
Il ~~~° 23
4 ,22
~ z z9x 25
~j 39a ac
/ 6 32
g
IOOOAC ~ 39 27 9009 ac
8 C•m 3 610AC
23894c / 21 iop 30
w ",,. , 9 / 43 28 2 6cAc
:~ 922 AC Imo'
I 10 i SDAc - 29
o,- 31
i 50ac _ ID 00 ~ ID1.
• ~~ 4 504 ACICl 18 i0 Ac lDl
12 l- _•n •` / ~ 3097 Ac IC1
I~p IS •-~13 ~~' X00 41 ~ .~ v~ ,
14 IozA%
:, 2 lox 105 Ac
3 ocmlDl/ 0
3 75 Ac IC I 2
~~ ~ 9~ 34
e S 33 34 Ac
is ~
I6' , ~ • 35 23 Izac
/ 491 •
25AC ~44 2440AclDl
~ i7 ac iDl 27 45 AC lCl
0 6~ACIC1 45 42 70 A[ ~
\\ 47 59acu ~ •
\,1016Ac
- `.
58
\_
106A~1 / ~~ 48
20 Ac
IC )
37 28 Ac
\ 49
262 Ad1D1
i6. 2 ISAC .IC~ 3946 Ac "
99AC `\
54 ~ ~ '
~5.95Ac ~ __ ~ ~~~ ~
~~' DEPARTMENT OF Webb Road, Route 615
1; E'UE3LZC FACILITIES
D-9
a,
,~
~ .,>
i
~.~
n~ su
NORTH
~~~* % ~~,VZCINITY MAP
.:.s _.._I_~
2z I
7e
CIOO,Droo /
675 26 I(
HAYSTACK o
MT
..
so
sz 667
ear
9~5 ~~
- - ~ o~z ° z•s 668
~-eao ~
VICINITY MAP
_~ \
~ ~ ~ \
\
\
' IFiyl.: ! l
~/
`
2 i3ActDl
\ 2 53AC1C1 '
~~ 2
~\
~ \
~~
~
3
~
.
1
4 ~
5 22iAc !
SOIAc
,7 ~
c~.sowr bw.+~ ~+ I
i 25AC lD)
9BACIC) „
r
. ,
6 l
I I 10
195AC 9 I
` 17 Ig,.
~
I9 I
~ 16
4.30AC I.IOAc ,27 ~', ~
N
N
~ ~
272 21 ~
4 S2 Ac lol
2.59 Ac I
~.92 4c1C1 e
22 xr
2 Oi Ac
23 r . ~
~ I
2 01 AC IOOAc
25
c\ ~
__ -----
----
/287-~
D°Sf ~- - -
NORTH
/j
li I
i
~__
47
10 20AC ID1
14 23 At lCl
na ~ i~~ i ~~ ~~~ ~ MOSON
~ ~~ ~ z
~ 10 c~a.°° ~°,
P / 1t ~• ~o Np / ~/v ~e~ c11 • \\
,~/ ~ k ° ~
ro, e70 V4. / B/7 6561\ 1 •L
+~~~1tr~~~ a... •J .r-r r. _ r~ ~; iii
THE R~oceS `7°. - . S1o"c ~O 'i, ~ / ~
aOCE ~ 69J ° ~ i^/pVi P 4jHoveos 5 ote ~ / ~ \~J
~I _.~ e - - -- - ~... .. t~
~ (.p r n. /
r,~ '.~ ~ f
'`I rvr
ranamW
~~ ~~~ --- \ ~ 12
2 JU Ac lC1 A~ ~ ~V !e
z 38 Ac 10 13 \
6 ~ ~ '~~ .4
,~ ~ ~ ~ ~. > ,6 Ac ~ ~.v ~
s ' ~ ., t 16
?J \ \ J~~
~y 4 29
~? I C. ~ ~\ 'l7
091?S .''
S L _ S1 l
/ Z \~ IA \
. 7 .. 0 \~~ ,~(
3 ~ ` '~ O ~ ~ , 19
~ N
rJJ LV
's ` 3I ` / ~D ~c
21
~- • ';e. ~ ~i Cr~ -
+. 6 G~ zs
II ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~~ ~~
" 4 ~ \1
.12 ` '~ \ i
r ~ ~
-- 13 ~. z ~ Ac
o
~~ ~ ~
r ~ _ 5
14 \~. z \ _
~ ~ i
r: ~ ,
15 `~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ._~ -z ~z
e ~ 2 \ ~
8 9 j +6
Q 7 ~ ~ ~ ~' 9pOro~ 5.
J '
°'~ 5 .e 8 3~
9y
.~a 4. \~; ~ ` 3 \ 596 AC ~c~
r~ ~ 8 ~- ~ 4 i ~. 4 ~~o
\ \
1 ~ ~\ 'p
c3 ~ ~ n
~ \ a
~/\ 3.33 ~;, l
zo
~ ~; ~
,, ~
i9 5 // .; \
16 ~~ ~ ~ verndaie ~~ p, ~~
~., ~ ~~ ~
~. //
' 6 ~~ I bA_ \/ z \ \
..,~, ,v ~~, ~
~.~
r .s FLORIST ROAD, ROUTE 623
~~~,-~~j~~ PUBLICMFACIOLITIES D-17
~.~„~~
/~
.~
.~ ,
~~, O
eri oR'
,~e a o•,
G O
~~ ~ ~I
to O\/ / ,~
iB )~ ~ 4 ~ /
i,r
~,OO ~ ~
o i
0 0~
o ~ `~~ '
r;
,~
` \
0
.~
°,,--
aa I
O`, N
P~~ ~ eo ~
.~ °~ '°' 4
:o ~
09=
d BOA\O<.
636
.~ 0 631
•y a \
221 n~ °~
VICINITY MAPS.-. NORTH
m ~'
V
~O
~ ~
C ~ ~ _- ~~o ~^~
~ fA \
f~ ~~
... ~l ~e. o00 3 ~iac /
l
6 %/
097 AC (Cl
5 \`,
~ \
2 4 ~,- J
120 AC 6 1
3
1 I 125Ac ~ '~
~ 9
~ 28 3JAc
~~
/ I
~~~ 3 37A.c
1• / /
~~ /
,, ~,` ~
~ ~f
J' O \\ <~ /
Map 40.14 i~ ~ ~~ /
• I00' ..~
t
~~` ~
ff
1
\ ~~
56
as s2 Accol
ao 3b a~ccl
. 3
~ ~
~~~.
%~ ~ ~ \
i ~
i
i
~~ IZ ~ ~~
2 OOAC % 13
~ /~ ~ % 3 7b Ac
i
~~~.~.
i~
I /
~ ~
10 ~ / _.
i3.534c ~ - ~
II
1353 AC
i
~' ~
15
is a0ac
~\ jl / O
r { Q7
r<~/~ ~ ~
/ ~ \
DEPARTMENT OF Made Creek Road, Route 636
PUE3LIC FACILITIES
D-2 2
0~.~~ q
(o..•~~
b
~~n ~ /
Tf TNTTY MAP
5'
woe.-
n^
~'o P
,o
~~
~7•
! ~
- ---_ _'iE ~ 7
~. ~. ~ ~~~
NORTH
6.
.- ~S DEPARTMENT OF Harborwood Road, Route 639
' 1 PUBLIC FACILITIES
~' D-2 3
~ ~'
-- ~ DLPIIRTMENT OF Dry Hollow Road, Route 649
- ~ PUE3L ZC N1ICZLITIES
D-2 5
/ ~ °~
/~
• / ~ _>
,_ ,
a. S / /~
61~ t G /
o.rr
_ / /
[.N• O.fO of /
61~ i ~
tr
t
?d0 `
.~ ~~1
r~1
'VICINITY MAP ~S' ~ 1 __ NORTH
~_ _-
It!4i
c__. ~
~,, ~1 ~. ~
NORTH
i~• \
;J ~~
s S ~ ',:_ : ~ fir' Mti ' •Lil .5~ • •,~ /
c ~~~
O 9 .~ ~I / 1~ I I ~
. _ ~~-
_ .e '] • O~
•0 _ _ ,ycr •. I
I ~~,._ - _ 1, ,,`:
-• 1 'r' S i
f )IY \~' ~ 1. C.
~ ~i K // 1 ri) ~ _r I• _~
` a • ~- ,
__ ~ _. )7
~) •r•~1~.1 ~^~5S ..
- \V J B.•
a6 i C~ • i ~-•__.__
~ V•. i'61r e9 rC t'... ..
\ I
) •1
a, a.. ")~'; 1); 72 `\ I 1tl 1\ Sri •• ..1
r7 tai •. ).%~ ~]\\e xrw '~\` '', ~\ ... 1,\ ~-~ B!
ice::... p,., i4s: ~ ~ .__
!'7i
5
2 i ~ '.• ~ '' , ~ 7 i I ...
.~~~~I.)a 12 1n 79 I6 2)2i z),
o coo' O
Ca•.r C%
~ .a2 .± •a • .6
•)
~ 4 )0 .
7' x
~ ~: L ,
.. i)• 111 ;. s, ~ " J Sr as ~---
) ~i ,< 6 0 11 • i .. ~ ~ 1 :. •.. qua
? ~ ~.' ~ ~
Q 2t O ,~~~ii I 7 ~~~~
G V t 1 ~ .
~:c •r .71 .. ~, ro.~~ti ~ .r
s) .~ )~ ii ~ 3 J
.-_. ____
~
DEPARTMENT OF BANDY ROAD, ROUTE 666
PUBLIC FACILITIES D-27
~~
M `.PV, ~`
ao~ ~~ ~'
~ ~~FMMS~
~`'
~OZ,~,~~ ~,~
~ '\~ B
__J i ~_~
.~.' ~!. ~
• ~' ~^~^Y ~^^' ~
r~ ~
,~` p.
~,,,.~ \
1 ~' , ... -aw-
.. do - N~.` -~ / i
•~ C,~_Tfµ~.B g ~ R i
~~ ~ ~~
~ ! r
_`o ,/4,,~~ ~
VICINITY MAP
$' :. '.
~.,
~ ~
~ ~ ^' Gt"
.a
~ _~ _
DEPI~RTMGNT OF Roselawn Road, Route 689
"~~ ~ PUi3LIC FACILITIL•'S
`"'~~~~.
D-3 0
NORTH
~ ~ ~~
~ +
1 .o„ t ~ - ,
18 ~ ~
II7%Ac _-
.
rC
y
~ •
;M
I ~.
OI
4 ~ .
W
c r
21 9
,
~ e Map a8 90Ac fD)
'--
~_ 25.13
I""100 I 12440Ac 4269 Ac (CI
6
230Ac a
O I fJ n
I \
-
46
2 IOAC f Dl
I 0.58 Ac ICI
22 ,
8
0A
(~
• OB Ac
'
23
45 \
c
3.2
78 A
CI ~ 2 33A
c
2. zl0 • ~
I• c
42.
~
25
:
~ 27'
n• ~ 1974[(D)
L+ePdC)
28 26 N' _ "_-- 4T
:-.,~ -~"Ig7PC ~
32 LDSac(Dl 1270At
I.lo•c lol 31 ~ ~ 75AC lCl
0.79AC Kl 29 „c,
34 ~ \Ir24c(DI
~p.70AC IC)
9 m
>>7-c
s
Roanoke G/rl Scnv7 Council \'
236.00 Ac > sZ ~
41-- -i p
l 1 004[ (DI 39 ~ Ojpc 44
\ o e6ncfcl I ~
`•
\ , 7 94 Ac
\a 43 „ 49
421 g00At(D1 .4o Ac
• 7.21AcIC)
1 BOAc~
P/0 36.00-I-2
P/0 36.00-I- 5 I"•400
w
M f6B 000
~
~~ ~~
~~ I""~,
-- ~~ ~ ^
,1
S DEPARTMENT OF JANEE DRIVE, ROUTE 651
PUBLIC FACILITIES
`'~ '- r
`~~•/~' ~'•J '/~jan 8 ~91831
~. : ~"~
.., ., ~ , r `+r, 8~~ ~M to-
°"`~ ~1 ~~ VICINITY MAP~~
~ onraz._
~S ~.
^Yv ,~,fii~
.. `9-J
i~iw"~-
' ~ i~-~~"
~ / / ~ ~~ ~
_ Df(IANO`~~
y~~' - ~°'`'..
Sl,', /y~iµyi~M~~~
DGP11R'I'MENT OF Olsen Road, Route 768
E'UI3LIC F1ICILI'I'IES
D-34
1
NORTH
~ - ~o~ d MEnDOVV'kat~S~`t~c~"y"t ~ } \ .\ ~ ExrTZ/~\nca~sU^''/~"'•tfr~`>
~ 6T. a v _ rgnrH. u,. '~ryt' r- (NYII S , :~~
W4~,- '~. ~J t
'' ""..,,~~ ~ ° p°'~ RCwvJnF COUwrv wr~~dl'4 ~ f `f' ~ ~ ,'~/:
.PVIEYY \..~ ~acurwT.on,r T,,,~ r ~ w~v~cwit ~. 97 ourv..[w ~~ t y.~_ ,[
~' .' ~„ \ SCHOOL ~ ~~1~` ~ ~ ~f. . ~O (•1'~k., ~~ Y ; r A~'""~ ~ \~`~Jxr7?
,•' ~O s • DR ~~ `j• N •~ ' ~ My ~AQ~> r~ J': ~~SY(I M~. ,. ~ ~ ~`
'\~ .L CO/E A Q~ y~'1~, SI°~g. .~T ~ p `~-M1~a`~"J ~ f q:~}\\\ y ~.
\• r ~ 57 E w u ~' ' ^ 'Y ~~,ti rr~ p~ s" l d+' pmt vbZw~\ 1t
~a`, s ~ .. ~~ .
.,~
MONK ~" ~~ ~ i ~ `~, ~\Qc \•~~,
4~j ~ ~ L9 ~ ~ ~ q1a J t M~OURT W'
3 E. ,/ .ylppp 4 f ~'~~{o t '\` /P4 ~D Y~ 1~
~`}' 2'wS ~j _ l p0
I~ ~.,P~ ,„~~,~E~r' :,.4`".~VICINITY'MAP" \'o ~ ~. ~ _.wr ~
~. ~ ~~ ~.
NORTH
/~ /
x•\01' ~ ~
7 •~'? /
/ ~ / e
:t._\~ \ e
O 32 /
`, ~\. it /. ` 3 9/\, ~ ~ / •.~ ~ 7!3 _ • , y6 / \ /'/ t x ~ F .
~i~ /way 6 •\ %6 i9 ~v :~ Sa YYY /.~iy ?T •~ Y \~••
. \ 9 \ ``
. c•...
\\~\ /M. `~~,,'. ,•~ n ` i6 l n \y 1 y r , ~q `\ ,\ y 2~ / ~ , i? -. .. ,at
\ e % Y ~ ~~ \ •I 7J . V.
n lam, 4 % a t ~~ ?''
'. 5 ~,' /~\.~ ! -' a '\
6t
OGPI~RTMGN'P 0[' Cove Road, Route 780
'- ~S l
~~,+~~L (SUE3L IC P11C I [.I'['I t:S
D 35
s f ,~ I fi I >Ker~ ° ~ b~yl ~.t. ~ .~ S
h. h~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ 1 ~~
ours ~ 3~ ''~
(~
g ~. •! u - ~ A.T~
4 y, ,o I ~~~[~~j g C
t+fa4b df' ~ °~r~~, ~ ,, ' 728
M1Ii f~, IJ ~~1[ f.'IG ~ ~nI ~•A/IO MY~UW
d GLFNMO~IT'd1r~ fR.uflf ~"~ Yf~ '~ ~
~-~~ -0.[r~MSN~nf?. '~ ~~, VICINITY ~MA P ,
.er ~~~°~ 8l rAAYCII /
dd' ~ "~ " r ~~ u' ~. ,~
vn[
X
~
Nu~~;~~'7+wg [+T~T
`
~
~ ~
R
~si~ tfai R~ucl
_ o
y
4
~
~+a ~~~,o
:s' -.
PK ~`
':
~ R° ..
PE
~
,
M
°
Ord EOGEHILT~,. Est
~ r
~~ "~
9,A ~ ap,.
5
~ ~ ~`
l ~
M
~
.
.~
,
,
Y
'
~
p
~'
N 1
U
~
S
~P~O'0.15YO~tA~ .:
~' ,4fiU.s~?v I~ N~
?'4'IG.,
7NA'
1
~~ ~ GgIFf iN Rd 4 :
i
~.~" ~.~
f~
-Q-
NORTH
~ 1
~G ' - u U cIV ill NomH (19 I`y 'Qtsc, ~Er ~~ 4f9 _..
g ~. <' ~ $~, g c'~ xwoa ,.coo-,,. m~ ~ ip.? .
~.., PENN t P"o~ ~ ~ArQi.'NOrgrr Iw[ _-/ f
~ ~ . _. _~t•., P 3 ~a ~~$ ~ ,ham`,.
=ay % ~.. ~B~vD ~ G.3ggy _ cowrrNS° ~ ~'Li~
Y= t ff E "luDr Dq= "-".. taco F K t1 sq~'wq ~E i
.Ea!;; ~ .~~ `,~~~ ~ BE~E~EA~ ~ ~ a, ~ ~ 4' ~~yg `°'°°"q~s . ~ -
' `RD 613 or~o~,~ $'
,v, 4~a ~ u ~ 4
DS q~~~I ( Sir 9 ~ o ~a+ ~,. dAS~ R t ~~~
ArrtE~.Rn iP'.. w 3i ~ m.KE~pFd~KE b'. RC.rw~~a, 9_ f '°6#' d'
r-..~~i Ev,N y~ y!'• #~ ~ ~t~ ~ ~ ''-d ~ ~:•i ®` ISOi`r $y`~~.
\aos ~ ~ R SpRIN9iAwN, ~,rA,,,,, rPN A.~,, I~~ 4 _ ,
ROStL7i 4 C1~S'~"'6.u^ro'rs Q4. ~ ~ +b„e.eF~ - ~i' . ~' ~ . /~SroR N/
~~ cy~~p.gr~~^ '~ M. y pa ® '~+ •. %~ ~ ~ ' CNESTERFlI;,O
~.S•a,,,P~~[- (M[MfM1' irk i .~µ $ _.• .IiC^:~ ~ ~ i ~ ' . EDEN ItCV_
"'T`~P~i ~ia~~''~t'`wQ" %tac~ta VICINITY MAP. , ~ ~',r' "- s. _
~^
~1~ ,ra~._ ,.`'tea ~ _._ /
NORTH
/ r
. ~ ~1' /~
. ate.. `~ ~ T ~ ~,, ~~ ~~. ~ .
- ~- ~ _
rr 6 » •~ ~ f / s
...... \
h •/ ~ iyrb
~~ }\ l ~ N i~ ~ ~ p01~
~ 1,
~ . ,~ - ~
1, • 0 ~
,.,. \__`
1
., ~ ~~ .m. ~~~ . ... ; ~ ,- o.~
DEPARTMENT OF Starkey Road, Route 904
PUBLIC FACILITIES
D-3 9
I O
~r r
/ =.~ '.
,a
W
/!
\
QtSP~21NGTREE , 7~ ~. ,~ <
l
I
} }
~'
~ r ~
,w
,N ~ ff~~-~""
~fe+
Wwr~l
,
j
1)
f ~
J
~
\
'. _
e
~
~~~.
POVLAq 6R~k. i, vy ,' ~ ~pE' ~
~
~~t +
_ ~.~.r._ _
.. BLANOCIEIO~
~ 4
g
`_ ~ '_
g
_ ~
1
'1
/"~ 651 _
\'~~ 1 1
~ 'c, - - - ~ ~~~ 651 f;
~ ~ .+:,~"~~'`t~ .VICINITY MAP_ ~.
`_~ ,~ I/
NORTH
./ ~~~-i 19 26 •
I ~ I' ~ 27°r,- ~ ~~ 32
'P ` ~ 3 S. tti f ~ ~ ~ ~.. ~~
2 ~ 16 ~~ X28 ` ~~,~; i
\ ,i' ~- \ 15 ~ O ' ~,
O \ ~ 3 O `
I i2 ac ~•, ~ 13 ~ r. j ' 31 ~,
~` / 5 i..
179Ac 26 ` ..B ?iOAC i`~~ R it 37 ~ v
o /
33• ~
a 3 `~ ~ x,39 • 35 r 33 I
• •24 •
• ~ r~ 40 ~~~ 34 V `~
n
22 0 ~ 37 .` 45 O` o" ql '~ 56 "~'` _~r._'~ ..•'~~/'
c` a o
~,~ 38 °~ 44 ~ 49 ~' S ,° ~ , ~'' S7
43 f / ~ /
~ .4 ~ ` 42 s~' ~ ` ~O X43 , ' "~ 52 ~2 ~
65 4 41 t'~~52t c. ,~~~ ~ O "~
;" 64 s d72 2 ? 71 3 51 "~' '~~59 • I~
< °~ ~•, 53 I ° ~ P ~ 70 45 "'' ° 50 :, • 60 z
X57; ` 62 /
58 ° 67 •.
i ° ,
u ~ z 53 Ac 63 <~
~'>~. ~
•. ~ 59 A J'' e ~ 65 r'~ ~ 9
~- 1 k
~ O~ ~ 7a l
~ 1~
2 ~~ 73 ' ~• ~ Roanoke
c 3e ~s Ac ~ Bed`a~
I
z~A< ~ 7a
i ~„~
~ ~ \ - 95,,
0 94 ~
E O .
~ r 93 ~
.. .
~ o
83 0 /° 92
~~ 82 \ ~~.~._
,~:~1
DEPARTMENT OF Burnt Quarter Drive, Route 1083
PUt3LIC E'11CILITIES D-40
~_ ~,
"'i '~_
NORTH
s 1 `i (~P' W p tlp -<°j it i,
,. - 43 ., ,J
' I e° 5 3 v 'o
~~ ~ ~o ° 47 °~~ 40
' ~ & 42
op e° ~ ! o ~^ .~ m 41
6
4 '° ~° 13
Arn 52 ~~bs
17 :° ,s ~'s
es
I 56 z 's b s ~ ~ rs
,~
,z 51 ~ so ~ 49 n °zzs~•°s
57 °,, °:. ~ zs
°
ss ~~! 64 f
~ ~ I
a I
ibT !2
i02/9
10
61 •!n~
r, !,
fl°w
~' u i !
e
17
-
7•
SJ
65 a 66
58 39 60 ~ 61 62 ~
~ E
eo
67 ., ~
_ ~
1
1
fl It ~ !!
- ~ '~ ~ Cresthlil ~ Jb
.~.-
~ I sO n~
~ I
-/,
i/
,e
'~ I
~
24 ~
~ - 26 27
-
28
s~
~
19
20 21 _ ~ ~
° _
a _
° __
sow „• _ ~
// ~ ~'d 9,
~ I?
' pl
six
!,~
29 '6°•z '
~'._' / 0
~
I
I I
- Izs
ass
~
n ao ~
,
~"~~,!
s ,a
~ ~
o/
/ d
31 •"2
Z
~ ~ \
I
I
I
I
wys z
I' •'
~ `. 19
e" ~ zn _ - 32 oN
33
34 e
31 •
14
O ,P
4
~
m ro z,
J°•
2 z,r ~ "°
'J9
r
28
zs n>,?i ~
• / ° e Q
8 °°
,:e s2
.b :s'n
2! !bK s !°
7N2
~
~ 32 27 c
'~
I
~~ J
~
~ N2]
Kirkwood
~
/ ,
~ ~
~ '9
~ S,
Pts
zo 'o
o
z'< ~
e 37
s°
8 ~
btb, ~ ~ zo Ts z y s .~
S
/ `p22 6 e /o .~A'
~ 33
zo
16
~ 26 ~ ~
~
~ / b~ 5 ~
^^ zs -~ 'z • '9 O 12
s
s
~ ~
r e
19 ~~
~
~ 6~ e
4
s e°
7 ~
~
37 ~
~
_ Yy s
s'
3
~
,a ~'
,h Q _ 9. 8 8 lcb e
~
6 •b!
s /
! J~ ~ ~
2
°
- ti. , ~ /. ,~ ~
9b9 o z ro 9 ~ ' '
,
P 10 ~ / ~0
, 23 y°. 14
~ ~~
I I I v ~o
~f
I!
6°°'
~
- ~ ~ • 's \
r) I
C - 20 'cv
`
- ~ She1d0~ _ 161y1 _~ g I9
1 Hlllp,ook ~
1
__. •
DEPARTMENT OF CRESTHILL DRIVE, ROUTE 1658
PUBLIC FACILITIES D-41
`4 u - ~ , ~. po MEpGE~'{~ PJ . I I5 ~ BE~i
~" \
~~ '~~p ~ [Y . \ GENT PIYN~pq.~. yM~"' ~. Pf(TM ~ ~ PJ . f
IDEN \ RANT
.pp r ~ \.. _ ~ "_.....-.~,, Hp E ~ f RETTT3r~s~. ~e wouwT,uw 601
tom- ~ ~~' ~ - Aouoa ~w~,lr ~t CLUB~E ~ T ~ .. T a~ ~G^ ~ q !(fM SCN
l~ _ (M~6TMN 3CMODl1O`~ ~ ~ I~~ l o 1
J \ ) OpD~D
r \L`~^Olt~ ~µCNd`~ `, ~ ~4.' o , p \ _ y/AT - y ; .
~ „~ y) G~~ \~\ T~nNU~n 4 - \~, ~ _- c d~'SUSI~ALL£Y~` wRfc~ D ,4 MILES _ .
•' \ t ~.~ 1 ~ ~ ,NFU d`4 -. "' ~'ti`{ NP 1 nqU, ~ -..I; ._.
. - ~ ,MS ~R~ 3y~ ~~,SNI fY-R0~ ~~ tvq~< ~ ~ `~ ~~ z ~ °sQ.
~.~- o o ~ yyJ,~ I
`~.. ~> ~ :f ~. ~~ ~ ~ ~ >o T VISTA /'`~ J~ ~ a !/%~
t ~' ' ~ 118 ~'sa <~ - C~' ~ ° `19 2Y0 '3. ~` . ~ - vISL4 HEIG1fT5 ~ ! _
vfl :~' $' CRN .,ed~~^"':'~ .. NsuwowcAem q0 ~p ~ '
~lA+uNlarxHD .~:,,>, ~~ ~ ~ t~ 601.
~,; ~ ~ p~ VICINITY MAP ~.._ _ .. _ _.._-- ,1r' : ~ .
NORTH
;.9
\ 3 ~ 3 I / 20 .,~ I
~J - m ~, ~ '6~ ra^ ~~ I
0~ ~
0
\ 36 21 132 12 ~ / 21 s '~,~ i
3 a -
~ - ' 0 2 L ~ z/ ,~ v
33 ~ a ji~ ~ 6 .
35 ze ~ ~ ~ T ~~ ~~• ~ ,o
,,^
~ 34+~~em ~ / ~~ ,,.t~ 23 J zz {"'~/ q~ 45
be. Se \\s ~s t. G e \.'44
sac G\vpt~~ 24 ~, t~ ~ ~ \~, se 43 C~- ,
tQ '~ `. PJ•eT Y EJ \ to
r. ,~
T ~' 26 ' ~ ~/ 42 ~ 'A9s
r. °
7 , J~ ~ PJ ~ lu ip 'EJ 8 Fr /
\\ 27 / J v .~
/ \ ~ zs 41 / 22
l,~ 28 ~ .o-` ~m ,e
PT // /
3 ~!
////{ ~C~ ~` ~ / 4~ T B a9
I •p 1 e M1
P t
~~
'o
~I l
~ 9
' ~ '~~ e ~z 39 e. / ° 21 "~ 2
i
iM1 '~ zz P m .~ i ,e
/~ m ~ DO to
c ~' I
' ` 20
~ .J
,/0 ~zeJ , ~ z
29 ~' °% ~ ~~'~ 7J , a'9
' r 2 T
Broowz~oe Pork /j/Rs 37 ej / ,JO , P J 19
gCBS ' e ;, 3 Ixo
7IOAc ~
~ ~ ~ iJ
~/~\~ j / ti 4 0` s 17 ~
\( \ - J \ sl 35 ~ / 5 s mss, r
~' ~ 34 ' T ~
"~ ~ ' I S
t , y 6 ~ s'z / sz N
7 9e z
32 / .e o„ e z ^~
.'~ - a
31 O ? ~d . ~~
2 '~ ~
3~ 9 /.O ~g '9 j , 13
' ~J / 8
•~ ~ 0 1~
nt
V I o ee Pa zo ~y 12 •B 31
~~~ q Or ~~ ~ I I ~~ a ~ ot°~ 9 ~ 32 ~ \
0
~ °o
\~~\
o ,,,
'~„
a °
0
\ ~ sz
d
nz, e ~'
4` ~ 35 sJ e ~
P ,e
\ ~ s. 3g
J /9
JJ 38 .
PJ
37 .~
!1¢~J
,~J `_
~~
\ asn /
DEPARTMENT OF Verndale Drive, Route 1867
PUE3LIC FACILITIES
- D-44
/ •Yi~7,y-~~ ~~ t(~B}ON~E~R/~~PWO~ fp(~~."at WWq~,,~EMW MN[VA .LAIf/utl~ +!'ELODY,~
w _~-~-~+y1 (`\E1 \-M'EM4lP1Rf ~`Ae~ - C~p°E NO ~ N"INErBTRA f(fFi M+lS.
s-~F a r _ , r SAM
.i
_ sou"~r C~ H ~ ~J~
~ ~ ~ , . cowaa ,~ ILL "~ `''hhi ~ .'~: ~.~ ~ '~runr~n +~
\c,y4y~~sr.,u ' \Y`1,-~~m"'.. oR -- ~ ~ '.Ew`~ _ sr op ~!'.
~c.,p~ ~ f/e'R _,..~ 1t KigK~ CRE~THII.t ' <^uuROOK ~ ¢ 'bM+.E~~oP' -, 221 0.~
J ~ OR ily OPT 'Eit(erroM. ® ~' ,~ O
I ~QP ~ 0~ b.' ~ ~ ~ pA f0.. 4.
~` ,$ ~. _ao' o~ +419 ~ - __ - ^~~'"` ,~
CA5TLE?tOCK fMS_- w~(~A~.tAKE °Z CRE57wrlt~r . ~,~r,,,: '~ ' . PJ `
\ - GREEN~~s`0 ~:L^REIANp~ .~ V I C I N I TY MA P rum ~_ aE ..
`5 ~~
~ ~ r
NORTH
. - ~
o
~ j /~ \ G`
\ ~t
~ ~ " Q~~~S~t ~~~ ~ ~~ 5
F 1 rL`L~ `l 6
\~ o ' •\ ~~ ,~ 7 3
`> ~.
~. ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ III 10 ~9 •y^
~c)5 •~ ~f ~~ 15
I ~~ Gore - P
7 4 \N \ ~ \ / I °m \ ~" ~ I7
~ 14~~ ', `,, ~
5.2 ~ 4 !/- ~ ~ 13 ~~ A O~
~ ~ ~,
~ 0 g ~ ~. 3
~ ~.. ~.s ~ `6 qw ~ w ~ ~ r .. 8 p ... \
° 6 'T ~ 37
~ I , \ M'
r ~ C°unlr dOmmis/rpnve Cenler
~ ~ ,E. oRCes ~ 2 aoAc lol 39`~ •
o ~ 5 ~ 4 ~ 3 78 Ac (C! ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ •~~ ~ ~
o ~
~ R C B S eet `° a ie ~;f,
a° a h, / •., eo. Jc~eE .. 10 /~~ .. •,.41 ~ 42"
e . \ l
c ,b tJ s ''s Esc
12 ~. ~^Q7 e \ Rces rynces 7 ~ e.z ~ F
rv e ~ nces ~ 12 s:: \
s
~ / ~ 6 + - ,
c ~ v e.~ r, a,z16 4 .° 3 R' 2 8 I e /" • 16 , 48 ~ lI Io
~O - I I ' q ~ g o ~ ze ' /~ ~°'Cb s gae y +•
~Q' 13 ° ~ zz r. z. 9~ .o ,,. 53 • 47 , ' ~
'Q •..'ti .•r5 S9B 1S 9i SZ 9: ~ y (7 / .5,' - I+ 12 ~J
~~~ "5 ~ b~, ~ - ~ .-~SZ ~ , - ~ ~ ~ . 46 58
_ 60 59 ~ a • - ~ _ _ e, -
I\ , ` ie ° ~ 57 56 z+ ~ `S1 18 / i~E ae ~ 1~. 59 6 ' ~
•`5 ` ~~ 61+• ~ lr fY X6926 __b_'e_, ` 451E Z• b.,•
' / 2• 9~ I.
'~ M6r < d/
17 19 v A 63 4 0 44 ' n =
•ee e ~J ,a 20 ~ '~ ~en ~ 8 ° 64 'z~~`£,', 6~~ ~ ~ ,A i6 '2'~A ~.~ r ~ {
' ~ •:
r ., \ ~,~ ti
32
' +,, ~ 4
_ z ~ s's
33 -- ~~ a ~\.
. ~-, i
\ a ,,'~
- ,.
40 ~ ` •
~~ ~ ~~
zF I"~.eE~0.ra[ k ,
.! n $
rro L+fLCErts ~ ~+
:cos ? ,, _
~q~(L
` W
~~ or v ~tf~,
s. J _ .~ .
DEPARTMENT OF Bunker Hill Drive, Route 1602
PUBLIC FACILITIES
~_~ ,
• ~- -~~ /
C~nunfg of i2nttnnkr
JOHN R. HUHBAR D, P.E.
ASSISTANT COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
October 29, 1986
Dr. and Mrs. Charles W. Houghton
6846 Briar Ridge Circle, S. W.
Roanoke, Virginia 24018
Dear Dr. and Mrs. Houghton:
PUBLIC FACILITIES
I am in receipt of your letter and petition regarding your
request for road repairs and improvements along Route 688, Cotton Hill
Road.
This request will be included in our review of the 1987-88
Six-Year Highway Plan.
Sincerer,
n,
L
~-~.Tohri~ Peters, III, P.E.
Roads and Traffic Coordinator
JAPIII:wr
;~l
P. 0. Box 29800, Roanoke, VA 24018-0798
0'-'6t~X"38Lh~'"'-F~2~~.;'~~R~~f9=~ (703) 772-2073
a+v"_
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
We, the undersigned, are residents of Southwest Roanoke
County, State of. Virginia, and live in an area that necessitates
our driving along Route 688, otherwise known as Cotton Hill
Road. We find the road to be very winding in certain areas ~ '
and unsafe. As such, we would appreciate consideration being
given to straightening the~road and thereby eliminating the
curves in the following sections of road: a series of curves-
that begin .8 miles from the intersection~of Route 221. to the
intersection of Grubb Road. This is currently a one-half mile
stretch of road that could be reduced to ~.3 miles if straightened.
We feel that construction of an entirely new roadbed would
best facilitate removal ~f these curves: Other curves that
could be eliminated with limited excavation_would be those
that run from the crest of Cotton Hill Road to a few hundred
yards short of where Cotton Hill Road intersects Route 613.
Respectfully submitted,
September 26, 1986
Name '~. Address-
J
.~~~ /~
~-- ~ ,
_ ~~ o rcc,ly A • (~ n p S GiB~.~ J'yCG 50 ~ a n l-, Tr , r2 n~,~ ~ n,~ VcA ~ a y 0/ ~
C /p
~ rr~ f?Sd~l/ ~~~-'7 /~%9s
~a~G UU .
~~L~ G i~
,1 ~ ~
~ ~ _`'~~~(1C{ ~ ~'YL,~..~-- ~ SS's S E ``// ' /
h ~~
~a87-~
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
tJe, the undersigned, •a re residents of Southwest Roanoke
County, State of. Virginia, and live in an area that necessitates
our driving along Route 688, otherwise known as•Cotton Hill
Road. We find the road to be very winding in certain areas '
and unsafe. As such, we would appreciate consideration being
given to straightening the•road and thereby eliminating the
curves in the following sections of road: a series of curves ;
that begin .8 miles from the intersection•of Route 221 to the
intersection of Grubb Road. This is currently a one-half rile
stretch of road that could be reduced to •.3 miles if straightened.
We feel that construction of an entirely new roadbed would
best facilitate removal of these .curves: Other curves that
could be eliminated with limited excavation would be those
that run from the crest of Cotton Hi11 Road to a few hundred
yards short of where Cotton Nill Road intersects Route 613.
Respectfully submitted,
September 26, 1986
Name '•
._
Address-
• ~O~l~~
~C~Q,
~,5~
- ~ - ~ ~~~ cam-- ~
,~ .
NAME
___}
~~O~Ca Y~
v
'~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~/ ~
~,. ,~ ~,
~,C~6
~ ~ ~~~
//~~
At~.~ m da^F
Sf~
.~ r.~
ADDRESS
~z~~
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
ode, the undersigned, are residents of Southwest Roanoke
County, State of Virginia, and live in an area that necessitates
our driving. along Route 688, otherwise known as Cotton Hill
Road. We find the road to be very winding in certain areas
and unsafe. As such, we would appreciate consideration being
given to straightening the road and thereby eliminating the
curves in the following sections. of road: a series of curves
that begin .8 miles from the 'intersection of Route 221. to the
intersection of Grubb Road. This is currently a one-half mile
stretch of road that could be reduced to .3 iriles if straightened.
We feral that construction of an entirely new roadbed would
best facilitate removal ~f ti~ese curves: Other curves that
could be eliminated with limited excavation would be those
that run from the crest of Cotton Hill Road to a few hundred
yards short of where Cotton Hill Road irrtersects Route 613.
Respectfully submitted,
September 26, 1986
Name '
Address
~~~~
y ~~~2~
~~~~
v
~~~
.,
,~
NAME
ADDRESS
~ ~1.
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
~I~~e, the undersigned, are residents of Southwest Roanoke
County, State of Virginia, and live in an area that necessitates
our driving along Route 688, otherwise known as Cotton Hill
Road. We find the road to be very winding in certain areas
and unsafe. As such, we would appreciate consideration being
given to straightening the road and thereby eliminating the
curves in the following sections of road: a series of curves
that begin .8 miles from theintersection of Route 221. to the
intersection of Grubb Rond. This is currently a one-half mile
stretch of road that could be reduced to .3 miles if straightened.
We feel that construction of an entirely new roadbed would
best facilitate removal ;;f these curves: Other curves that
could be eliminated with limited excavation would be ti~ose
that run from the crest of Cotton Hill Road to a few hundred
yards short of where Cotton 1-fill Road ir;tersects Route 613.
Respectfully submitted,
September 26, 1986
Name
Address
~~
;% '
J
~.~~ ~ k„d i~~~~~h~,-,< i ~l Y.~ F via
NAME ADDRESS
Ll/. ~ ~~ ?~~. X31 c,r.r j~,:~,~ C~ , %~~.14 /~~ ~ Yom' t~
~ ~
NAME
4[~/V~
ADDRESS
7 `f~'.~ j
Y !ter ~~~~ / r ~D~~~ 1-r ~ ~O/ ~
2~1a18
~ ~~/~~
~.
NAME
ADDRESS
y~, ~a~,~so.~/ `7~ ~z ~~so.c/ /twod TR, I~°'~~.- 2yo l &'
LZ%~v1, ~~ ~~ 7~ Cr~-~ /fir ~/ ,~t~-- ~- ~G:
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
We, the undersigned, •a re residents of Southwest Roanoke
County, State of.~Virginia, and live in an area that necessitates
our driving along Route 688, otherwise known as~Cotton Hill
Road. We find the road to be very winding in certain areas ~ '
and unsafe. As such, we would appreciate consideration being
given to straightening the~road and tf~ereby eliminating the
curves in the following sections of road: a scrips of curves.
that begin .8 miles from the intersection~of Route 221 to the •
intersection of Grubb Road. This is currently a one-half mile
stretch of road that could be reduced to ~.3 miles if straightened.
We feel that construction of an entirely new roadbed would
best facilitate removal ~f these curves: Other curves that
could be eliminated with limited excavation would be those
that run from the crest of Cotton Hill Road to a few hundred
yards short of where Cotton Hill Road intersects Route 613,
Respectfully submitted,
September 26, 1986
Name • ~ . Address-
~.
,~ ~ ,
NAME ~ ADDRESS
~g6'3 Td? I~-- ~iF
- ~9~ ~ ~~~f ~,~~~%
-SG3~ ~! ~ 1 C ~ ~~
~~ .t~
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
We, the undersigned, are residents of Southwest Roanoke
County, State of Virginia, and live in an area that necessitates
our driving along Route 688, otherwise known as Cotton Hill
Road. We find the road to be very winding in certain areas
and unsafe. As such, we would appreciate consideration being
given to straightening the road and thereby eliminating the
curves in the following sections of road: a series of curves
that begin .8 miles from theintersection of Route 227. to the
intersection of Grubb Rond. This is currently a one-ha.lf mile
stretch of road that could be reduced to .3 iriles if straightened.
We fell that construction of an entirely new roadbed would
best facilitate removal of ti~ese curves: Other curves that
could be eliminated with limited excavation would be those
that run from the crest of Cotton Hill Road to a few hundred
yards short of where Cotton Hill Road intersects Route 613.
Respectfully submitted,
September 26, 1986
Name Address
1 _
i v~
~~~~
~ ~o/~
~?yad-
~ ~ ~~
~ ,~~ k.~~~~ ~y~i~
2i , ~ yo /d~
z ~~ ~~
arc ~ , ,~ ~ 8 5 9 ~~~ o,:- ~~
,rte
ay~l~
.%
'.. ~ Ff ~l~w--
1 ~ ~E lti ~tJ
w-~7z 75~~
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
fi y ~ o/ic~~ ~
We, the undersigned, are residents of Southwest Roanoke
. ~ County, State of. Virginia, and live in an area that necessitates
our driving along Route 688, otherwise known as Cotton Hill
Road. We find the road to be very winding in certain areas ~ '
' and unsafe. As such, we would appreciate consideration being
given to straightening the road and thereby eliminating the
curves in the following sections of road: a serifs of curves
' that begin .8 miles from theintersection of Route 221. to the
intersection of Grubb Road. This is currently none-half mile
stretch of road that could be reduced to .3 miles if straightened.
We feel that construction of an entirely new roadbed would
best facilitate removal of these curves: Other curves that
could be eliminated with limited excavation would be those
that run from the crest of Cotton Hill Road to a few hundred
yards short of where Cotton I-fill Road intersects Route 613.
Respectfully submitted,
2~,~e=E~i~.,_._~. v~cee.~.t., 2oGG ~i-/~fiso~~~. ~,au~kf
September 26, 1986
Name
Address
a~~~
~~t //
u~~ [~n~,
~y'~~ ~ v,~~~~ ~~~1~
~~s .~d~~ ?~08 j ~
3 Fn .c r
~7~~~ ~ r
w, ~.~-~ . Z ~ra~P,
D ANl bl'~ VA ~-~b j g
c-.~~-
Z~oi~
z~o~~
~~ v
r
A P P E A R A N C E R E Q U E S T
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
PUBLIC HEARING ON ~~` ti./= ~ ~'~~ , ± r' i,,_~~ `-a`w G j `~ '^,.
I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to
recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so
that I may comment. I agree to follow the guidelines listed
below. WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND
ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD.
1. Each speaker will have between three and five minutes
available whether speaking as an individual or
representative. The chairman will decide the time limit
based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and
will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of
the Board to do otherwise.
2. Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of
view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by
the Chairman.
3. All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between
a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed.
4. Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all
times .
5. Speakers are requested to leave any written statements
and/or comments with the clerk.
6. INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL
FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP
ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM.
~• ~~~
P L E A S E W Ci /[ "' " G~
______ _ R I T E L E G I B L Y
NAME : \ ~V ~ C~ 4•r~c~ ~- ~c~v (; ~1`t~;•'1
r
ADDRESS : G~~YY<G ~ % ~~(/~~ ~' ```~J'C Cr'.
PHONE : ~~~_ ~.S,,S~J
PLEASE NOTE: (After filling out, give to the Deputy
Clerk. Thank you.)
A P P E A R A N C E R E Q U E S T
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
•
PUBLIC HEARING ON ~.c~KD(ary ~oC ~lar•
I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to
recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so
that I may comment. I agree to follow the guidelines listed
below. WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND
ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD.
1. Each speaker will have between three and five minutes
available whether speaking as an individual or
representative. The chairman will decide the time limit
based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue,. and
will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of
the Board to do otherwise.
2. Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of
view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by
the Chairman.
3. All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between
a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed.
4. Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all
times .
5. Speakers are requested to leave any written statements
and/or comments with the clerk.
6. INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL
FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP
ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM.
P L E A S E W R I T E L E G I B L Y
,/
NAME:
ADDRESS:
PHONE:
~~-~~~ TiM~caevi~ 1C~
~2oflNr~x~, ~i~a~~~~9
PLEASE NOTE: (After filling out, give to the Deputy
Clerk. Thank you.)
A P P E A R A N C E R E Q U E S T
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
PUBLIC HEARING ON
~~
J~~~~J~t2 A
I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to
recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so
that I may comment. I agree to follow the guidelines listed
below. WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND
ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD.
1. Each speaker will have between three and five minutes
available whether speaking as an individual or
representative. The chairman will decide the time limit
based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and
will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of
the Board to do otherwise.
2. Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of
view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by
the Chairman.
3. All comments must be directed to the Board.' Debate between
a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed.
4. Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all
times.
5. Speakers are requested to leave any written statements
and/or comments with the clerk.
6. INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL
FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP
ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM.
P L E A S E W R I T E L E G I B L Y
NAME:
ADDRESS:
oS'c~t/,~ L O O ~
D~
PHONE: '~~ 2- ~'~~ ~j
PLEASE NOTE: (After filling out, give to the Deputy
Clerk. Thank you.)
A P P E A R A N C E R E Q U E S T
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
PUBLIC HEARING ON I ~ ~ '~ `
I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to
recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so
that I may comment. I agree to follow the guidelines listed
below. WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND
ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD.
1. Each speaker will have between three and five minutes
available whether speaking as an individual or
representative. The chairman will decide the time limit
based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and
will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of
the Board to do otherwise.
2. Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of
view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by
the Chairman.
3. All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between
a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed.
4. Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all
times.
5. Speakers are requested to leave any written statements
and/or comments with the clerk.
6. INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL
FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP
ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM.
~,~ ~ ~ .~,
P L E A S E W R I T E L E I ~~`"-
- - - - - - - - - - G _ B L Y
NAME: )
/~~/"'lam -- 5 ~ ~ %~i/D ~ ~ g c~ ,~
r C,
ADDRESS : ~ L ~~ ~' n1 ~ ~) ~ ~ ~ ~; L ~ '~ ~~~
,'`~
~~ ~~ ~ ~:"~ r~- ~ ~ L l ~
,-
PHONE:
PLEASE NOTE: (After filling out, give to the Deputy
Clerk. Thank you.)
~` A P P E A R A N C E R E Q U E S T
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
PUBLIC HEARING ON _~ Z- ~' J ~
I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to
recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so
that I may comment. I agree to follow the guidelines listed
below. WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND
ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD.
1. Each speaker will have between three and five minutes
available whether speaking as an individual or
representative. The chairman will decide the time limit
based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and
will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of
the Board to do otherwise.
2. Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of
view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by
the Chairman.
3. All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between
a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed.
4. Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all
times.
5. Speakers are requested to leave any written statements
and/or comments with the clerk.
6. INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL
FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP
ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM.
Z -z'- ~
P L E A S E W R I T E L E G I B L Y
i
NAME : ~' /
ADDRESS : ?//Z
,~
7~~ ~,`- ~
PHONE: ~ ~`~ Z ~/~--~
PLEASE NOTE: (After filling out, give to the Deputy
Clerk. Thank you.)
.
A-121587-8
,..
ITEM NUMBER ~ +-`~~~"
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
IN ROANOKE, VA., ON TUESDAY,
MEETING DATE: December 15, 1987
SUBJECT: Plantation Enterprises, Special Exception, Golf Course
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:'
Petitioner proposes to construct and operate a nine-hole golf
course on 34.77 acres of property zoned R-l, Residential, located
adjacent to Plantation Road and the Old Manor Subdivision within
the Hollins Magisterial District. A Special Exception is
required to operate a country club and related facilities in an
R-1 district. The course will be operated year-round from
daylight to dusk, seven days per week. The facility will not be
lighted. The course will be operated as a small country club
with a member-guest format and a maximum of approximately 30
players using the facility at any one time.
The property is located within a Development land use area. The
policies within the Development category encourage outdoor
recreation uses. The property borders existing low density
residential on the north, south, and west and dense forest and
floodplain on the east. A golf course of this scale should
insure protection for surrounding property owners by providing
for a low intensity use adjacent to existing residential
development. According to the applicant, the playing portion of
the course as shown by the proposed concept plan will be
approximately 100 to 150 feet from the nearest house. Flying
golf balls may be a problem.
Petitioner's request is a low traffic generating activity. It is
estimated that 171 vehicle trips a day will result. This rate is
equivalent to one unit of single family housing per 2.03 acres.
The current zoning, in conjunction with the availability of
public sewer and water, permits up to six units of housing per
acre. Three units per acre could reasonably be anticipated. The
proposed concept plan shows that the access will be through the
Old Manor Subdivision. Staff strongly recommends the development
of a separate means of access through the petitioner's property.
Proposed course will partially be located within the 100 year
floodplain. The applicant must prove by a certified plat that
the clubhouse will be out of the floodway and that the first
floor elevation of the clubhouse structure will be at least one
foot above the 100 year flood elevation.
~~' ~.~._
Community sentiment is unknown.
The petitioner's request was originally scheduled for the
November 17, 1987 meeting; however, due to incorrect acreage
calculations, the request was continued. Concerns at that
meeting include screening and buffering, lighting, access, and
flying golf balls.
As part of the permit and to alleviate concerns, the following
conditions should be attached:
1. Screening and buffering plantings only in accordance
with Type D, Option 1 of Sec. 21-92 of the Roanoke County Zoning
Ordinance along Plantation Road and adjacent to properties on Old
Manor Drive and Old Manor Court.
2. No outside lighting.
3. No access off of Old Manor Drive; entrance to be located
off Plantation Road.
4. Installation of a net between plantings and golf course
along Plantation Road to prevent damage from errant golf balls.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None . ~~
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of this request subject to conditions
as described above.
SUBMITTED BY:
Rob Sta zer
Director of Planning
APPROVED:
Elmer C. Hodge, Jr.
County Administrator
--------------------------------------------------------
ACTION VOTE
Approved (X) Motion by: Bob L. Johnson/Harry No Yes Abs
Denied ( ) C. Nickens Brittle x
Received ( ) -Garrett x
Referred Johnson x
To McGraw x
Nickens x
cc: File
Rob Stalzer
Tim Gubala
/c. ~,..
~~~, -•
z p ~~/
ROANOKE COUNTY ~~ ~ ~~~'~
~ -:_
APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL EXCEPTION USE(_•
4 '.. -...
1. Applicant's Name: Plantation Enterprises Phone:3b~-v906~
Address: P.0. Box 7806
Roanoke , Va y., ,/~( Z ip: 24019
2. Property owner's name
Address: on request
. ll. Sto/k.es Jr .
~~~/ ~ ~t
tisa Kavar~au~h/Harriett ideas
Phone:
Zip:
S~~ f
3. Location of Property3~'t. ~-~ Plantation Road
Roanoke, Va. 24019
4. Tax Map #: 3803 Parcel 23 , 27 , 2~3 (3~ ~0~ - 3 - 23~ Z~, Z 8~
5. Zoning Classification: R- ~ ~Z5 21 fZ~7 ~ ZG~ _
6. Magisterial District Location: - 5.4~
7. Existing Land Use:
Agriculture
19.E I
7rl A~ ~ es
8. Proposed Special Exception Use: '~ hole golf course (priva e
9. Attachments submitted (check completed items):
8~" x 11" plot plan
List of adjacent property owners
Filing fee made payable to "County of Roanoke"
$20 Special Use Permit for sanitary fill method garbage and
refuse site, commercial amusement park, or airport
$40 All other Special Exception Uses
10. Date of Application:
11. Applicant's Signature:
12. Owner's Signature:
~~ -` ~, ,e
:'_~~ 1'` ' r..r
PL~VNT/1T/OU 120A.T7
6
O
~~
g,~ ~
~~ +~Or~ .
~~~
~~ ~
U`
'1
~~
,,
/ % ~ ~"
// / irk ~~
~ "~-.r E
r
/ ;.¢ t~ ~~
~ ~ : ~ ~~
.~
~` ~ /
~*
.~s=
\ .~ ~~~.
a ~~.y ~,a:;~
~ ~
T
Q1
a
n
m
O
~l y,~,
~j.. ~,^qIR'
~.
1'4 :P ~
~'
~1e~*K.k 7a.e
~~ 'r~ ~~
~
.~ ~
z
y
y
m o N~ ~..~s
~ ."~ ~ v
o ~ _.
pUbZ
~
~ ~
fi
~b°~ ~+
'
~
rn ~
~ dr ~'
n
rn -n
~ ~ ~n
m ~,~
RI
unoru
i
A - 'Y
_, •_ ROANOKE COUNTY
~ DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT
~e
Plantation Enterprises
Special Exception (Golf Course)
4
.. ~ .
FLTITIOIV
F3oA R D.
/ /` ~~J,~
41L, the undersigned, qualified voter (s~, freeholder (s),
and~or person (s~ affected who are residents of the Southwest County ~•
Roanoke, Virginia, do hereby strongly express our opinion that we do not
desire to have a Burger Y.ing Restrauant at the corner of Glen Heather Dr~.ve
and Route 4'19 (L,lectric Road .
Reasons: A. That intersection cannot tolerate increased
traffic, at anytime of day or night. 4dith a
Day Care Center having that intersection as .there
L
only means of southbound traffic, a site of too
nurnerous accidents, it would endanger more lives.
B. Glen Heather Drive is an ingress and an egress road
to the Pines Apartment Complex,, which has nwnerou~
residents. ~ / (~ cybt.
C. 'rlith the terrain of the land having to be changed
to accomodate a parking lot in the back of the
business, off oi' Glen heather Drive, thi:~ would be
unsightly for the Fines Apartment Complex,
D. Glen Heather is the bus route for both County and
City schools.
E. Devaluation of property in adjoining subdivisions,
Pdame
.
~
, Address
f
`
J ~
~. ~ • ~' ..~ _
t C-~. ~ ~ t ~~i / )
'L..!L ~~ % L. ~ `~. / „ ~.~~ ALL:
~
c~ (~' , - ---°
_
~= ~ ,.4 r:
-~
Phone
l~ ~~
~,.
//
PLTITIOI~1
47E, the undersigned, qualified voter (s), freeholder (s),
and~or person ( s ) affected who are residents of the Southwest County ¢~'~} e ~ T Y
Roanoke, Virginia, do hereby strongly express our o~~inion that we do not
desire to have a Burger King Restrauant at the corner of Glen Heather Drive
and Route 419 (Electric Road).
Reasons: A. That intersection cannot tolerate increased
traffic, at anytime of day or night. t~7ith a
Day Care Center having that intersection as there
only means of southbound traffic, a site of too
numerous accidents, it would end~.nger more lives.
B. Glen Heather Drive is an ingress and an egress road
to the Pines Apartment Complex, vrhich has nwnerous
f
residents,
C. 'dith the terrain of the land having to be chanr~ed
to accomodate a parking lot in the back of the
business, off of Glen Heather Drive, this would be
unsightly for the Pines ~1~rtmerrt Complex.
D. Glen Heather is the bus route for both County and
City schools.
E. Devaluation of property in adjoining subdivisions.
Name
~-~
Address
Rhone
!/ r
~.~
M
/ - . ,
... lic~.inr,;
Address Phone
~ ~ ci~.~ , y_ Q'a
a
yam, ~ ~
;. ~ -
Cr ~ c ~< < ~ ~~~
,~~
, 77~= o
~~
~s ~ w L ~,,~ . s~ 9 g - av c
~z
~ :~ ~~
~. %Z,~,,~~ ~ .
~ z z ~,, ~
~. C ~QL'Zi
~~~ 6 ~ ~ 'V ~ ~ ~ A ~ / L
vV % ~77'~~~~
~- ~ - ~7r
9~9~~ ~~
~~
sZ~
~ ~ Q ~ ~,1.
. --~e~ . ~7 - 8,.3
~ ~ ~ 7 ~-oz
~' G~~c~ o~~ ,~
~ -~~~~
~ ~~
• • 1J~,ine
7
~~_ ~c
' ~
~~ ~~.~.
Address
~' / / /l U
~~ ~
Phone
~/
v ,3" `
J r ~/K/J/ ////~
~ ~ ~ r / ~ ~~~~ rJ l.~J
/ / / ~ ?
G .1~~~.-
V ~ I ~) (~ ~- r, ,~
f
~ ~~ ~~~~~ ~ f ~ ~ y
-~. ~~ ~~
y~ ~ ~ C `:
/ ~ ~ A /~ ~, ~ /G 1
_ _ , /
C
~~ "
j ~
~r
'
o~ ~ ->
E~~
tea/
~ ; -~ .,,.,_ ,~
2 ~
c,> ~ ,~
u~~~ - z : ~~ n ~~ ~z ~
~ ~` t
` ~'~
P E T I T I O N
WE, the undersigned, qualified voter (s), freeholder (s),
and~or person (s) affected who are residents of the Southwest County ~'~
Roanoke, Virginia, do hereby strongly express our opinion that we do not
desire to have a Burger King Rest~~'nt at the corner of Glen Heather Urive
and Route 419 (Electric Road),
Reasons: A, That intersection cannot tolerate increased
traffic, at anytime of day or night. [dith a
cf
Day Care Center having that intersection as.t
. only means of southbound traffic, a site of ~ee-
numerous accidents, it would endanger more lives.
B, Glen Heather Drive is an ingress and an egress road
° to the Pines Apartment Complex, which has numerous
r
residents,
C. YJith the terrain of the land having to be changed
to accomodate a panting lot in the back of the
business, off of Glen Heather Drive, this would be
unsightly for the Pines Apartment Complex,
D. Glen Heather is the bus route for both County and
City schools.
E, Devaluation of property in adjoining subdivisions,
1
Ilaan~
~~' ~' ~ <'C- ~~~~~
-"'/~~'
_ C~- t-- C! ..c
~~~?..~ /
v
Address
/ r' ,~~
"'`-...
L (1 JL 1~~, /
5~.
Phon,
~7'~
5` - ~~1
P E T I T I O N
WE, the undersigned, qualified voter (s), freeholder (s),
and/or person (s) affected who are residents of the Southwest
County and City, Roanoke, Virginia, do hereby strongly express
our opinion that we do not desire to have a Burger King Restaurant
at the corner of Glen Heather Drive and Route 419 (Electric Road).
Reasons: A. That intersection cannot tolerate increased
traffic at anytime of day or night. With a
Day Care Center having that intersection as their
only means of southbound traffic, a site of too
numerous accidents, it would endanger more lives.
THINK OF THE CHILDREN.
B. Glen Heather Drive is an ingress and an egress
road to The Pines Apartment Complex, which has
numerous residents.
C. With the terrain of the land having to be changed
to accomodate a parking lot in the bac}c of the
business, off of Glen Heather Drive, this would be
unsightly for tYie Pines Apartment Complex.
D. Glen Heather is the bus route for both County
and City schools. THINK OF THE CHILDREN.
E. Devaluation of property in adjoining subdivisions.
Name Address Phone
n
-~S ~5/
~..~ ~~ _ /356 D~ ~ ~
--
~~
- _ __ _ . ~~
WE, THE UNDERSIGNED, residents and property owners
of real estate in the area near the intersection of Glen
Heather Drive and Route 419 in Roanoke County do hereby
indicate our support of the rezoning of a 1.714 acre parcel
of land at the northeast corner of Glen Heather Drive and Rt.
419 in the County of Roanoke for the location of a Burger
King Restaurant thereon.
NAM E
~,
--'-~} , - J -----------
ADDRESS
--
I) f~ / ~€
------------------------------
------------------------------
------------------------------
------------------------------
------------------------------
------------------------------
------------------------------
-----------------------------
\~Q.
WE, THE UNDERSIGNED, residents and property owners
of real estate in the area near the intersection of Glen
Heather Drive and Route 419 in Roanoke County do hereby
indicate our support of the rezoning of a 1.714 acre parcel
of land at the northeast corner of Glen Heather Drive and Rt.
419 in the County of Roanoke for the location of a Burger
King Restaurant thereon.
NAME
---
` ~
~~
-- ~~ --- C ~~ ----
--
.~-
ADDRESS
----------~~--- -- -~, s,~i--
~ 3
S
------
~ -=---
-
-
- -
--- ~
2 33 ~! - ~-'~-t' ------~ y -~ ~.
~~.
~.
532 ~~ _ ~ ~,~ ~. Sly
4
• Name
Address
hone
~ h
y~lG tires-~h~/l ~N. 9 ~'?/~~~
y
~~
~~ ~ ' ! ~~-r~n.~ .~ A -
i
_~ ) +J
/
-~ ~ -!~1 1~...
-~
P E T I T I O N
WE, the undersigned, qualified voter (s), freeholder (s),
and/or person (s) affected who are residents of the Southwest
County and City, Roanoke, Virginia, do hereby strongly express
our opinion that we do not desire to have a Burger King Restaurant
at the corner of Glen Heather Drive and Route 419 (Electric Road).
Reasons: A. That intersection cannot tolerate increased
traffic at anytime of day or night. With a
Day Care Center having that intersection as their
only means of southbound traffic, a site of too
numerous accidents, it would endanger more lives.
THINK OF THE CHILDREN.
B. Glen Heather Drive is an ingress and an egress
road to The Pines Apartment Complex, which has
numerous residents.
C. With the terrain of the land having to be changed
to accomodate a parl~ing lot in the baclc of the
business, off of Glen Heather Drive, this would be
unsightly for the Pines Apartment Complex.
D. Glen Heather is the bus route for both County
and City schools. THINK OF THE CHILDREN.
E. Devaluation of property in adjoining subdivisions.
Name
Address I Phone
~~~~~~ --
~.""tJ~' --~~'""'''"``J -_ _ ~ ~ v ~ E v~a-H-c~u,-~ ~-~..~ S ~ «' ~f o r ~" `7 ~!- Sd~ 7,3
!~(al,~d.s~--`~'. -~o_..nc~__----~~W3o _~o-cu.v_~, _.~'d . S,t~U _ _ z 4o I g- -1---q 8`~ ~ '] 8 °~3
Name Address none
/~~
v
'~
~ `~ U ~ K.SIiG _ J
~/ f
yak /~ _ ~Y9 -~ ~~y~
-
, _
1
f 4
~ -~
-~
1
, _
~~ -~.-_,1 ~ -
_.
.- ,
i 4.
1 C
~w
,.' i
./ ..~~
c> ~ - ~ _
L
;~
~L~_~ ~ ,,~ ,~
~~ ~
4/V ~ ,Y c ' L'~ G"L,~
r
11 / ~~~ ~ ~'~
j
~
~
~ ,r
.
~
r~~
~
~ ~ ,~, /~ _
`~ ! ~~~
~
~ ..
~,.
C
~
` ~~~ ~~~ v
~ .
Name
~+~C ~.
~ ~
~~
Ir ~
. ~~ ,
~ ~~ ~ ~
o ~ -
,u... - ~/
~-
~'~ ` ,
~~ ~, .
~`~- Y~
1~,~.,.~; C~ i~~
Address hone
i
_.______
X130 ~Q ~e~ ~ _ ~ 7~
~ ~ ~~~ 1 L~~ ~_ <<
~' ~~~y ~ ~~~~~ 4~ ~ ~/
-~ -~
'~_~~
~~
~~ -~~ -
~~7 ~ a
~ 7~ ,Y.~
~ ~7 ~ wood ~. ~,~;
~ .~ 1~
~~=
~~~. ~~~~
~7°f -i'7`~~
~~~
~ "~ ~'' ~
iL
• c~N_ .~
WE,•THE UNDERSIGNED, residents and property owners
of real estate in the area near the intersection of Glen
Heather Drive and Route 419 in Roanoke County do hereby
indicate our support of the rezoning of a 1.714 acre parcel
of land at the northeast corner of Glen Heather Drive and Rt.
419 in the County of Roanoke for the location of a Burger
King Restaurant thereon.
NAME
ADDRESS
~~~ ~~~
,,
~; ,.
~~?~ ~~~~ _C='~--eke ~~
~~
~- r
l~ ` ~
.5 ?_~~ - %S-'~! _ .mac,-.~--------~ --
~J yl/~ ,
- x_73 7 _~, ~ _~~ ~~- `~='~' ~•~ -~~ ~ ~
z
WE, THE UNDERSIGNED, residents and property owners
of real estate in the area near .the intersection of Glen
Heather Drive and Route 419 in Roanoke County do hereby
indicate our support of the rezoning of a 1.714 acre parcel
of land at the northeast corner of Glen Heather Drive and Rt.
419 in the County of Roanoke for the location of a Burger
King Restaurant thereon.
NAME
---
ADDRESS
~//O ~f ~ ~L ~ d ~ G7 S T. _S~/ f~' ~~~D/r~F~
WE, THE UNDERSIGNED, residents and property owners
of real estate in the area near the intersection of Glen
Heather Drive and Route 419 in Roanoke County do hereby
indicate our support of the rezoning of a 1.714 acre parcel
of land at the northeast corner of Glen Heather Drive and Rt.
419 in the County of Roanoke for the location of a Burger
King Restaurant thereon.
NAME
~~ _ ,
ADDRESS
J
z
WE, THE UNDERSIGNED, residents and property owners
of real estate in the area near the intersection of Glen
Heather Drive and Route 419 in Roanoke County do hereby
indicate that we do not oppose the rezoning of a 1.714 acre
parcel of land at the northeast corner of Glen Heather Drive
and Rt. 419 in the County of Roanoke for the location of a
Burger King. Restaurant thereon.
NAME
----------------
------------------------
-------------------------
-------------------------
-------------------------
------------------------
-------------------------
-------------------------
-----------------
ADDRESS
------------------------------
------------------------------
------------------------------
,~
_.
------------------------------
------------------------------
-------------------
~y
WE, THE UNDERSIGNED, residents and property owners
of real estate in the area near the intersection of Glen
Heather Drive and Route 419 in Roanoke County do hereby
indicate our support of the rezoning of a 1.714 acre parcel
of land at the northeast corner of Glen Heather Drive and Rt.
419 in the County of Roanoke for the location of a Burger
King Restaurant thereon.
NAME
_~,
_~- _ --
-~,...--~-- :~T-- ter--- ---
-~ ! _" ,.
ADDRESS
-~-= --
~~ -~
~~~~~ ~ %
...~ ~ ~ J
~~
~-
~y
WE, THE UNDERSIGNED, residents and property owners
of real estate in the area near the intersection of Glen
Heather Drive and Route 419 in Roanoke County do hereby
indicate our support of the rezoning of a 1.714 acre parcel
of land at the northeast corner of Glen Heather Drive and Rt.
419 in the County of Roanoke for the location of a Burger
King Restaurant thereon.
NAME
~_ ~~ :zG.L-----
~ r -
,~ ~~
i'
;,
~cl'YL f~ ~~
L ~ ~~l ------------
---
~Tz ~~~z
----------t-------------
ADDRESS
J ~
----- ---
--~-1 r x`-mil-1 ~i ~~_1- ~ ---------
-----j% ----------
~~_.~,~~ ~, __ _~ - ~.1__~ s ~ tis
_~
~._1-~ ----------------~- l-L------
L _
~~
L Cb 11'
/~ , 1
5
WE, THE UNDERSIGNED, residents and property owners
of real estate in the area near the intersection of Glen
Heather Drive and Route 419 in Roanoke County do hereby
indicate our support of the rezoning of a 1.714 acre parcel
of land at the northeast corner of Glen Heather Drive and Rt.
419 in the County of Roanoke for the location of a Burger
King Restaurant thereon.
NAME
ADDRESS
WE, THE UNDERSIGNED, residents and property owners
of real estate in the area near the intersection of Clen
Heather Drive and Route 419 in Roanoke County do hereby
indicate our support of the rezoning of a 1.714 acre parcel
of land at the northeast corner of Glen Heather Drive and Rt.
41 g i n the County o f Roanoke for the I oca t i on o f a Burger
King Restaurant thereon.
NAME
~ ~~~
ADDRESS
~~ a~ _j~~~~~ _~~ ~
... _~
L 2,
WE, THE UNDERSIGNED, residents and property owners
of real estate in the area near the intersection of Glen
Heather Drive and Route 419 in Roanoke County do hereby
indicate our support of the rezoning of a 1.714 acre parcel
of land at the northeast corner of Glen Heather Drive and Rt.
419 in the County of Roanoke for the location of a Burger
King Restaurant thereon.
NAME
ADDRESS
_ _ .._
1'Z .7 f
__ r.-~ __ ~-_ __
~t~~ ~!~ ~_"~ ~1 C-~ 1.
_~ / ,_~ ~
_ __ _ '~_ ,
--~ t
~~ ~ ~~~ ~~ ~~' c.~
WE, THE UNDERSIGNED, residents and property owners
of real estate in the area near the intersection of Glen
Heather Drive and Route 419 in Roanoke County do hereby
indicate our support of the rezoning of a 1.714 acre parcel
of land at the northeast corner of Glen Heather Drive and Rt.
419 in the County of Roanoke for the location of a Burger
King Restaurant thereon.
NAME
ADDRESS
~~
/J~ ~
WE, THE UNDERSIGNED, residents and property owners
of real estate in the area near the intersection of Glen
Heather Drive and Route 419 in Roanoke County do hereby
indicate our support of the rezoning of a 1.714 acre parcel
of land at the northeast corner of Glen Heather Drive and Rt.
419 in the County of Roanoke for the location of a Burger
King Restaurant thereon.
NAM E
ADDRESS
r,
G ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~ ~~~
--- ~~1 ------------(/-------
9,~/ ~ ~- ~
WE, THE UNDERSIGNED, residents and property owners
of real estate in the area near the intersection of Glen
Heather Drive and Route 419 in Roanoke County do hereby
indicate our support of the rezoning of a 1.714 acre parcel
of land at the northeast corner of Glen Heather Drive and Rt.
419 in the County of Roanoke for the location of a Burger
King Restaurant thereon.
NAME
ADDRESS
~~~9
r
_----- ---- --s ~--------
-----------1 ~ ----------------
~r ! I ! t /,
/, ;, ,~~ `
S~
WE, THE UNDERSIGNED, residents and property owners
of real estate in the area near the intersection of Glen
Heather Drive and Route 419 in Roanoke County do hereby
indicate our support of the rezoning of a 1.714 acre parcel
of land at the northeast corner of Glen Heather Drive and Rt.
419 in the County of Roanoke for the location of a Burger
King Restaurant thereon.
NAME ADDRESS
~,
////'-~ -~
j d
j "' ~~~ ___ V.
1 ;~/ -__
3,17 ~c~~ ~f_ ail _a~ l'
_ ~,f ,
7
~% ~ ,r
8
WE, THE UNDERSIGNED, residents and property owners
of real estate in the area near the intersection of Glen
Heather Drive and Route 419 in Roanoke County do hereby
indicate that we do not oppose the rezoning of a 1.714 acre
parcel of land at the northeast corner of Glen Heather Drive
and Rt. 419 in the County of Roanoke for the location of a
Burger King Restaurant thereon.
NAME
~~
i
ADDRESS
~ ~,
t ~ _.~
WE, THE UNDERSIGNED, residents and property owners
of real estate in the area near the intersection of Glen
Heather Drive and Route 419 in Roanoke County do hereby
indicate our support of the rezoning of a 1.714 acre parcel
of land at the northeast corner of Glen Heather Drive and Rt.
419 in the County of Roanoke for the
King Restaurant thereon.
NAME
location of a Burger
ADDRESS
i
~~~~-~
A P P E A R A N C E R E ,Q V E S T
PUBLIC HEARING ON '~~~n~114 ~ ~f (day ~~~~~ ~~~t14 0.~` ~~~{
I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to~
recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so
that I may comment. I agree to follow the guidelines listed
below. WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND
ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD.
1. Each speaker will have between three and five minutes
available whether speaking as an individual or
representative. The chairman will decide the time limit
based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and
will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of
the Board to do otherwise.
2. Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of
view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by
the Chairman.
3. All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between
a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed.
4. Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all
times.
5. Speakers are requested to leave any written statements
and/or comments with the clerk.
6. INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL
FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP
ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM.
P L E A S E W R I T E L E G I B L Y
NAME:
(',
ADDRESS : ~~~i:al~. ~~~~;
X31\ t ti ~ ~ ~' "~'l: ~
PHONE : ~ ~~ ~ '~ ~ r~ 4~'
PLEASE NOTE: (After filling out, give to the Deputy
Clerk. Thank you.)
i~.~~ ~
A P P E A R A LA C E R E .Q U E S T
PUBLIC HEARING ON ,~
I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to
recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so
that I may comment. I agree to follow the guidelines listed
below. WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND
ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD.
1. Each speaker will have between three-and five minutes
available whether speaking as an individual or
representative. The chairman will decide the time limit
based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and
will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of
the Board to do otherwise.
2. Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of
view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by
the Chairman.
3. All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between
a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed.
4. Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all
times .
5. Speakers are requested to leave any written statements
and/or comments with the clerk.
6. INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL
FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP
ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM.
P L E A S E W R I T E L E G I B L Y
NAME : ~ - ~~
ADDRESS:
~~ ~ ~ c~ ~~
PHONE : J ~ ~ --
PLEASE NOTE: (After filling out, give to the Deputy
Clerk. Thank you.)
A P P E A R A N C. E, R E,Q U E S T
PUBLIC HEARING ON ~hn I~.ew ~~~~e - .~a~ ~'~
I would like the Chairman of the Board of Super iv'sors to
recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so
that I may comment. I agree to follow the guidelines listed
below. WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND
ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD.
1. Each speaker will have between three and five minutes
available whether speaking as an individual or
representative. The chairman will decide the time limit
based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and
will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of
the Board to do otherwise.
2. Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of
view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by
the Chairman.
3. All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between
a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed.
4. Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all
times .
5. Speakers are requested to leave any written statements
and/or comments with the clerk.
6. INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL
FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP
ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM.
P L E A S E W R I T E L E G I B L Y
NAME : ~ I ~ I ~ Q'
ADDRESS : ~~ ~ f ~~
PHONE:
~1-
Li ~. ~
FtiI ~
PLEASE NOTE: (After filling out, give to the Deputy
Clerk. Thank you.)
A P P E A R A N C.E R E.Q V E S T
~,- ,
PUBLIC HEARING ON ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~, ~. /~ --~ I ?,~
--~
I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to
recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so
that I may comment. I agree to follow the guidelines listed
below. WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND
ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD.
1. Each speaker will have between three and five minutes
available whether speaking as an individual or
representative. The chairman will decide the time limit
based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and
will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of
the Board to do otherwise.
2. Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of
view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by
the Chairman.
3. All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between
a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed.
4. Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all
times .
5. Speakers are requested to leave any written statements
and/or comments with the clerk.
6. INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL
FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP
ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM.
P L E A S E W R I T E L E G I B L Y
NAME:
ADDRESS:
PHONE:
PLEASE NOTE: (After filling out, give to the Deputy
Clerk. Thank you.)
A P P E A R A, LA C E R E .Q U E S T
PUBLIC HEARING ON ~~~~~~ '~-~/~~~" ! ~M %~ '^~~~'/
I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to
recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so
that I may comment. I agree to follow the guidelines listed
below. WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND
ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD.
1. Each speaker will have between three-and five minutes
available whether speaking as an individual or
representative. The chairman will decide the time limit
based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and
will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of
the Board to do otherwise.
2. Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of
view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by
the Chairman.
3. All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between
a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed.
4. Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all
times .
5. Speakers are requested to leave any written statements
and/or comments with the clerk.
6. INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL
FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP
ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM.
P L E A S E W R I T E L E G I B L Y
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
NAME: ~~~R~-~ ~ °~ ~f;,~//}.f~~.~
f
q .---
A D D R E S S : () (~ ~,, ~ ~'~D.~. wQa .~ ~ f~ ~ '~/
~o~~ f ~ - ,~- ~ol~'
PHONE: ~/'/'~ -
PLEASE NOTE: (After filling out, give to the Deputy
Clerk. Thank you.)
A P P E A R A N C, E R E,Q U E S T
PUBLIC HEARING ON `~G'r/% /d> ~ ~ /~ ~~ ~'~ ~`~~'~~~''~`'~~
\li~ ~7 ~•~rr~Cx-~
I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to
recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so
that I may comment. I agree to follow the guidelines listed
below. WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND
ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD.
1. Each speaker will have between three and five minutes
available whether speaking as an individual or
representative. The chairman will decide the time limit
based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and
will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of
the Board to do otherwise.
2. Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of
view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by
the Chairman.
3. All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between
a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed.
4. Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all
times .
5. Speakers are requested to leave any written statements
and/or comments with the clerk.
6. INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL
FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP
ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM.
P L E A S E W R I T E L E G I B L Y
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
NAME : ,~'~,~3,a ~ /7-, ~1~,%G~l.~-~~
ADDRESS : Z Z Z Z. ~ G~ -~ "~L.~~ ~T~ J-• ~''J or'•~i~ ;
PHONE : ~~~,~ ~/~~ mi ~/~,'
PLEASE NOTE: (After filling out, give to the Deputy
Clerk. Thank you.>
A P P E A R A LA C E R E.Q U E S T
- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
PUBLIC HEARING ON ,fY ,~.w ~ a ~ ~ ~2~GZ--o hr ~ ~ e
I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to
recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so
that I may comment. I agree to follow the guidelines listed
below. WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND
ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD.
1. Each speaker will have between three and five minutes
available whether speaking as an individual or
representative. The chairman will decide the time limit
based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and
will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of
the Board to do otherwise.
2. Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of
view only. Que:~tions of clarification may be entertained by
the Chairman.
3. All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between
a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed.
4. Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all
times .
5. Speakers are requested to leave any written statements
and/or comments with the clerk.
6. INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL
FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP
ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM.
P L E A S E W R I T E L E G I B L Y
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
NAME : S a.. -~,., c S ~2 C.~" d u ~'"~.
ADDRESS : If'~ U_ ~~a~ ? ~ (,
PHONE : ~~ U 3J ~~~ -G/ ~ 6 Z-
PLEASE NOTE: (After filling out, give to the Deputy
Clerk. Thank you.)
A P P E A R A N C. E, R E.Q U E S T
PUBLIC HEARING ON
-.
I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to
recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so
that I may comment. I agree to follow the guidelines listed
below. WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND
ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD.
1. Each speaker will have between three and five minutes
available whether speaking as an individual or
representative. The chairman will decide the time limit
based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and
will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of
the Board to do otherwise.
2. Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of
view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by
the Chairman.
3. All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between
a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed.
4. Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all
times .
5. Speakers are requested to leave any written statements
and/or comments with the clerk.
6. INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL
FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP
ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM.
P L E A S E W R I T E L E G I B L Y
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
NAME : 7}'~-~oL,~rc.( ,.~9
r -
A D D R E S S: S~ `~-- °ltf ~~ l~-?-L~ S~
PHONE : ~ ~ ~- Q ~ '1,,,,G
PLEASE NOTE: (After filling out, give to the Deputy
Clerk. Thank you.)
A P P E A R A N C. E R E •Q U E S T
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
PUBLIC HEARING ON
I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to
recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so
that I may comment. I agree to follow the guidelines listed
below. WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND
ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD.
1. Each speaker will have between three-and five minutes
available whether speaking as an individual or
representative. The chairman will decide the time limit
based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and
will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of
the Board to do otherwise.
2. Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of
view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained, by
the Chairman.
3. All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between
a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed.
4. Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all
times .
5. Speakers are requested to leave any written statements
and/or comments with the clerk.
6. INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL
FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP
ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM.
P L E A S E W R I T E L E G I B L Y
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
NAME : ~~-.rFir-
ADDRESS : ~~v~ .~ 7 v ~ GLhh.~--CvtJ ~t ~ v~
PHONE: rJ'~J C~ -~~~5 0~
PLEASE NOTE: (After filling out, give to the Deputy
Clerk. Thank you.)
~~8~-3
A P P E A R A N C E, R E-Q U E S T
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
PUBLIC HEARING ON
4~z
I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to
recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so
that I may comment. I agree to follow the guidelines listed
below. WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND
ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD.
1. Each speaker will have between three and five minutes
available whether speaking as an individual or
representative. The chairman will decide the time limit
based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and
will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of
the Board to do otherwise.
2. Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of
view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by
the Chairman.
3. All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between
a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed.
4. Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all
times .
5. Speakers are requested to leave any written statements
and/or comments with the clerk.
6. INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL
FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP
ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM.
P L E A S E W R I T E L E G I B L Y
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
NAME : ~ , ~
ADDRESS:
O ~I~D ~'~sL - ~ ~ L ~J
PHONE : ~ t ~ ~~ 3~-~' (~
PLEASE NOTE: (After filling out, give to the Deputy
Clerk. Thank you.)
i z8 ~- y
PETITIONER: JONES & JONES ASSOCIATES
CASE N[A~9BER: 48-12/87
Planning Commission Hearing Date: December 1, 1987
Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: December 15, 1987
1. RD~UEST
Petition of Jones & Jones Associates Architects to rezone a 1.086 acre tract from
B-1, Business to B-2, Business and B-3, Business to construct a convenience store
and vehicle lubrication facility, located on the north side of Route 117 (Peters
Creek Road) east of its intersection with Jones Street within the Catawba
Magisterial District.
2. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION
There were seven in opposition at the Planning Commission Public Hearing.
Concerns are: increased traffic and congestion; safety hazard onto Peters Ereek
Road; another convenience store not needed in the area. A petition containing 35
signatures of those in opposition was presented.
3. SIGNIFICANT IMPACT FACTORS
a. Circulation would be improved with fewer entrances onto Peters Creek Road.
VDOT has commented that the proposed one way entrance and exit arrangement
does not meet current VDOT entrance standards.
4. PROFFERED CONDITIONS
a. Concept plan dated November 2, 1987 and revised December 2, 1987.
b. Property zoned B-3 will be used for a vehicle lubrication facility.
c. Property zoned B-2 will be used for a retail convenience facility.
d. Buildings will be constructed of similar materials.
e. Locational signage will conform to Roanoke County's sign ordinance and will
have sides averaging less than 95 sq.ft.
f. All lighting will be directed into the site and not exceed 14 feet in height.
5. CONIlKISSIONER'S MOTION, VOTE AND REASON
Mrs. Flippen moved to approve the petition with proffered conditions. The motion
carried with the following roll call vote:
AYES: Flippen, Witt, Gordon, Jones, Winstead
NAYS: None
ABSENT: None
6. DISSENTING PERSPDCTIVE
a. None.
7. ATTACHMEEN'I'S
/Concept Plan (8~" x 11")
~ Vicinity Map (8~" x 11")
Staff Report
Other:
Robert Stalzer, Pl ni g Coirnnission Secretary
W
u ~ r= ~
4 f- v1
_ N
m00 W
Q .~
U
K
W
0
u
J ~
a~
W F.
H
0N0
J ~
Q
u F
~ N
W
f
O
u
Qu
rc~
wF
z
NWN
moo
~~
OP
1 / ~ \
Z
o
~
m
~_
--~
U
~
N
W
N
M
iy N
W
~
Z
(~
6J
.J W
W
a
~
U
W
2
~
a
Q U
U
m
~
J
W
U
w
>
W W
~
y
U
W
W
Z
°
~ h
a
W
~
a
2
~
m
J
a
-~°- W
4.
h
Z
~
a
,°
~
~
a
W
N
2
~
a
J
a
2
Y
V
6
J
7
m
i .~ 8 ~ ~- y
i
C
U
Y
J
N
W
H
W
a
e~
Z
Q
J
a
W
_F
N
J
Q
L~
nr
ii
U
Z
0
U
.~.
Y
W
m
W
U
W
O
N 0
~ m
W
to O
^
'N t~.
,Z
~
X
~ ~
17 oN
G! °
d~ ~' u
~Q ~Q ~
p~ 4MME H4.L4 C-
~v
!fk `Qw°+fJ `D~.p '~wIG ' D([UUm~4"~ 13~ =4
,~ c
x+90 ~'Ot_ ~ l~C_. S'r l*(~~ON N" ~ ,p f
fs'"~
M~~ES...•'' ~.4p : ~ " ~rgpl TS ~~ rNt~l7T
c~... ~o erg, ~
~S~' ~CC~~-/,LAY ~~y','q~~,~~Y~ J -~i Wr~ Eno
l ~~`f!. % t' ~G`i. '(f~ ;. ~ODENT~%YMC q~~. NJ,'a~
/.~/ ~' ~ ~_. Soa,~~
4 .ai`... E O
~~ ~ ~
p ~ f~i~ ~ Fq _ , C'~/~~~~ 4 ~ 1
.n S ~W_~•
`~ VICINITY MAP ~
~ ~ \
~D \
~o
,\~ \
e A
,•
d` B- I
,,
.,
~ '
~..
~ ~
~ ~
~ ~ ~
~ ~
~ ~ ~
~ O ~ ~
~~ / ~f3-1 ~ ~ ~ 5 ~
\ ~ ~ s
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
` \ ~\ \ ~ ~ ~
~/ ~ ~
,.~ ~...
•~•• i
9\ ~ \ ~ \ / ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Q~X ~ ~ ~ ~
/ ~ a ~
~ ~ ~K ~ ~
.~/ "~
'~~~
I~ -3
t Mv....
f- ~-- ~ ROANOKE COUNTY
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT Jones and Jones Associates Architects
~~~ ,~ B-1 to B-2
3
~ ~
~ + ~ ~ ~
~ zoo.. ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
\ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~~ ~ ~cok ~ - ~ .~
~ \ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~~
~ _ ~ j
\ '\~i/~
f ,.
.~
m~
STAFF REPORT
CASE NUMBER: 48-12/87 PETITIONER: JONES & JONES ASSOCIATES
REVIEWED BY: ROB STALZER ~~
DATE: NOVEMBER 25, 1987
Petition of Jones & Jones Associates Architects to rezone a 1.086 acre
tract from B-1, Business to B-2, Business and B-3, Business to construct
a convenience store and vehicle lubrication facility, located on the
north side of Route 117 (Peters Creek Road) immediately west of its
intersection with Dwight Street within the Catawba Magisterial District.
1. NATURE OF REQUEST
a. Conditional request to construct and operate a vehicle
lubrication facility and convenience store. Adjoining parcel
will remain as B-1 for the purposes of a
All three structures will be developed as arpartsofnalunified
site concept. Zoning pertains only to that portion of the
Property upon which the lubrication facility and convenience
store will be built.
b. Attached concept plan and zoning vicinity map describe project
more fully.
2. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS
a. B-2 and B-3 zoning classifications allow a wide variety of
commercial and office uses. Petitioner has proffered to limit
the property zoned as B-3 to a vehicle lubrication facility and
the property zoned as B-2 for a retail facility.
b. Site plan review required to insure compliance with County
regulations.
c. VDOT commercial entrance permit required. VDOT notes that the
entrances shown for building C will not meet current entrance
standards.
3. SITE CHARACTERISTICS
a. Topography: Flat.
b. Ground Cover: Cleared with low growing vegetation.
4. AREA CHARACTERISTICS
a. Future Growth Priority: Situated within the Hollins Community
Planning area. Designated for high future growth, urban
services available.
b. General area is predominated by a major four lane highway that
provides access to numerous office and strip commercial
establishments. Existing single family residential development
is nearby.
5. LAND USE IMPACT ASSESSMENT
Rating: Rate each factor according to the impact of the proposed
action. Use a scale of 1 through 5.
1 = positive impact, 2 = negligible impact,
4 = disruptive impact, 5 = severe impact, and N/A ma noteapplic blect,
RATING FACTOR /2 ~ ~ -
COMMENTS
LAND USE COMPATIBILITY
? a. Comprehensive Plan:
1985 Comprehensive Development Plan has
placed this area within a Transition land use categor .
petitioner's request complies with both the land use lan The
and defined policies. The Transition land
encourages the development of office and institutional P map
retail uses use category
with if clustered. The petitioner's uses and
policies TR-1 (preventing commercial s rawlequest conforms
groupings of individual buildings), TR_g P )~ TR-2 (planned
highway frontage development) and TR-g (enhance the quality of
buffering along rear propert (Provides screenin
y lines). 9 and
3 b• Surroundin
g Land: Property abuts existin
g single family
residential subdivision existing office development, and Pet
Creek Road, a heavily traveled major arterial highway. Pro
lighting intensity and height and dumpster location shoo ers
specified. pd sbe
3 c• Neighboring Area:
Mixed single family residential, office and
retail service and convenience uses.
? d• Site Layout: Petitioner has complied with Pol'
9
encoura es new retail uses to develo 1CY TR-2 that
independent buildings so as to P In Planned
permit controlled development of
retail uses outside of Core locations and to reve groupings of
sprawl. Petitioner should reevaluate the pumbertofoentrancal
onto Peters Creek Road (see comments under item
es
? e• Archite ~)'
cture: All buildings will be constructed of similar
materials as stated in the
similar materials submitted proffers. The term,
should be further specified.
? f• screenin
g and Landscape: Concept plan showin
screening and buffering improvements has g Proposed
Screening and buffering as per ordinance. been
proffered.
? g• Amenities: Adequate
parking provided.
? h• Natural Features: No negative effect.
TRAFFIC
? 1• Street Capacities:
aPAroximatel Combined facilities will generate
visit y 750 vehicle trip ends per da
this site daily), Current ADT ony (374.5 vehicles will
19,802 vehicles. Peters Creek Road is
4 J• Circulation would be improved with fewer ent
Creek Road. VDOT has commented that rances onto Peters
entrance and exit arrangement does the proposed one way
entrance standards- not meet
current VDOT
UTILITIES
2 k- Water: Adequate distribution and suppl
2 y'
- 1' Ser^'er: Adequate transmission and treatment.
5
DRAINAGE
? m• Basin: No negative effect.
N/A n. Floodplain:
PUBLIC SERVICES
? o• Fire Protection: Within established service area.
? P. Rescue: Within established service area.
N/A q• Parks and Recreation:
N/A r. School:
1 TAX BASE
s• - Land and Improvement Value:
- Taxable Gross Sales/Year: $550,000
- Total Employees: 9 $600,000
- Total revenue to the County/year: Approximately $12,500
ENVIRONMENT
? t• Air:
? u• Water:
? v• Soils:
? w• Noise: No noise anticipated from lubrication facilit .
Y
3 x.
Signage: Secured by proffers that locational signs for each
business will have sides avera in
(approximatel g 9 less than 95 sq.ft.
Y 9' x 10')• Petitioner has indicated that the
sign for the office will be 3.
lubrication facility will be 4~ x x 8~ and the sign for the
convenience store sign be g. x 9,6 It is intended that the
question the petitioner with respect toh theoheight of e chuof
the three sign structures.
6• PLAN CONSISTENCY
This area is designated as Transition and is consistent with
land use plan map and the defined the
Policy TR-7, part 3 Policies with the exception of
entrances. ~ that seeks to limit the frequency of driveway
~• STAFF EVALUATION
a• Strengths: (1) Proposal conforms with ado ted
exception of TR-7, part 3• P Policies with the
specific uses and the conce(t) Petitioner has proffered the
Policy TR-2 that encourages newaretai)1Pusesotocde~elo with
planned groupings of independent buildings.
p in
b• Weaknesses: (1) Circulation
Creek Road is undesirable, ~ specifically access onto Peters
residential neighborhood ~2> Because of proximity of
hours of operation should be specifieda intensity of lighting and
6
VIRGINIA: Page 1 of 2
BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY
A 1.086 acre parcel of land, )
generally located Tract B of Section 1)
Block 1 of Dwight Hills )
within the Catawba ) RECOMMENDATION
Magisterial District, and )
recorded as parcel # 27.13-6-62.1 )
in the Roanoke County Tax Records.)
TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY:
WHEREAS, your Petitioner Jones & Jones Associates Architects
has filed with the Secretary to the Planning Commission a petition to
rezone the above-referenced parcel of land from B1
District to B2 and B3
District for the purpose of
Construction of a Vehicle Lubrication Facilit and a Convenience Store
WHEREAS, the petition was referred to the Planning Commission
which, after due legal notice as required by Section 15.1-431 of the
Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended, did hold a public hearing on
12/1/87 19 and
WHEREAS, at that public hearing all parties in interest were
afforded an opportunity to be heard; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due consideration has
recommended to the Board of County Supervisors that the rezoning be
~~brnveri with nrnfferPri r~nnrii ti nnc
/ ~ ~ ~/ ""'
Page 2 of 2
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that th e Planning Commission
recommends to the Board of County Supervisors that the above-
referenced parcel of land be rezoned to B-2, Business
d B
an
-3 B siness
uiith rnn iti 4ns District. The above
ti
ac
on was adopted on
motion of Mrs. Flippen
on second b
y
and u pon the foll
i
ow
ng recorded vote:
AYES: Flippen, Witt, Gordon, Jones, Winstead
NAYS : None
ABSENT: None
Respectfully submitted,
~~
Secreta y
Roanoke County Planning Commission
~z~~-~!
VIRGINIA:
Page 1 of 2
BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY
co
N
~-~
Q
L~.I
~-
0
U
O
~-
0
w
0
a
A 1.086 acre parcel of land, )
generally located Tract B of Section 1)
Block 1 of Dwight Hills )
within the Catawba ) FINAL ORDER
Magisterial District, and )
recorded as parcel # 27.13-6-62 .1 )
in the Roanoke County Tax Records.)
TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY:
WHEREAS, your Petitioner Jones & Jones Acenr±;n+o~ e,.,.~,;+,,,.+_
did petition the Board of County Supervisors to rezone the above-
referenced parcel of Iand from B1 Office District
B2 General Commercial and
District to B3 Special Commercial District for the purpose
of Construction of a Convenience Store and a Vehicle Lubrication Facility
WHEREAS, after due legal notice, the Planning Commission did hold
a public hearing of the petition on 12/1 19 ~, at which time,
all parties in interest were given an opportunity to be heard; and
WHEREAS, after full consideration, the Board of County
Supervisors determined that the rezoning be apPr~ved v,~iuh ~'rof~er
U T Lcjnd ~ ~.wc,ns orY Dec~mbPr 15 , y ~ 8 7
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDERED that the aforementioned parcel of
land, which is contained in the Roanoke County Tax Maps as Parcel
27.13-6-62.1and recorded in Deed Book 1236 P~ 708 and legally described
below, be rezoned from B1 Office
District to
B2 General Commercial and B3 Spacial Commercial Districts.
7
Page 2 of 2
Legal Description of Property:
Beginning at a point at the southeast common corner of lots 10 and 11, Block 1,
according to the Map of Section No. 1 of Dwight Hi17.,thence with the northwesterly
side of Virginia Highway Route No. 117, a curve whose radius is 1996.86' and whose
chord bearing and distance is S34° 33" 15" W 91.49 feet, an arc distance of
91.50 feet to a point, being a highway monument; thence continuing with Virginia
Highway Route No. 117, S. 33° 11,,' 30" W. 197.63 feet to a point; thence with
the northeasterly side of Jones Street, N. 56° 55' W. 170.18 feet to a point;
thence N 37° 00' 00" E. 300.2(,, feet to a point; thence N 53° 00' 00" W. 152.93
feet to the place of beninning.
BE IT FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this order be transmitted to
the Secretary of the Planning Commission and that he be directed to
reflect that change on the official zoning map of Roanoke County.
ADOPTED on motion of Supervisor i~cGroS,
and upon the following recorded vote:
AYES: SuaervAscrs Brittle Garre~.t ~F
~_eGrav~~, A;ickens F Johrs~n
NAYS : None
ABSENT: ~,I~.e
Roanoke County Board of SupervisorsClerk
CC: Rab ui.alzer, Birect:~r o~ Planning
.tlain(71CX ~OVP_~;Te ~1PV~~1_Ot?i"!F'nt: i~P_V=iE?~',T ~irP_C-~f)r
.inrln ~!?1i.iP_~TO ~~E'-a t ~StdtE' F~S~-;~SSOr
~zg-~_~'
VIRGINIA:
BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY
A 1.086 ~ nacre parcel of land, )
generally located Tract B of Section 1)
Block 1 of Dwight H~ 11 s ) PROFFER
) OF
within the Catawba ) CONDITIONS
Magisterial District, and )
°~ recorded as parcel # 27.13-b-62 )
in the Roanoke County Tax Records. )
TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY:
z Being in accord with Sec. 15.1-491.1 et seq. of the Code of
w
o Virginia and Sec. 21-1O5E. of the Roanoke County Zoning
U
o Ordinance, the Petitioner Jones & Jones Associates Architects
~-
hereby voluntarily proffers to the Board of Supervisors of
0
~ Roanoke County, Virginia the following conditions to the rezoning
o
~ of the above-referenced parcel of land:
a
Q
1. The Conceptual Site Plan SK-1 dated 2 November 1987, prepared by
Jones & Jones Associates Architects. Revised 2 Dec 87.
2. The property zoned B3 will be used for a Vehicle Lubrication Facility.
3. The property zoned B2 will be used for a Retail Facility.
4. The buildings will be constructed of similar materials.
5. Locational signage as indicated on the Conceptual Site Plan will conform to
Roanoke County~s Sign Ordinance and will have sides averaging less than
ninety-five square feet.
6. All Lighting Systems will be directed into the site, The maximum height of
light supports shall be 14'-0~~.
Res ectfully su 'tted,
Petitioner
n
VIRGINIA:
BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF
RE: Vacation of Jones Street Right of Way )
in the Dwight Hills Subdivision of )
Roanoke County, Virginia )
~'
b
..
PETITION
~~~~ ~
.~ t ~~
i (~" ,,.
,,}
~%
TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY:
Jones & Jones Associates Architects and
YOUR PETITIONER (S) , ~ Medical Properties Associates
respectfully file this petition pursuant to Section 15.1-482(b)
of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, and respectfully shown
the following:
1) The Petitioner (s ) are the owners ® of Tract B, formerly
Lots 11 through 22 of the Dwight Hills Subdivision
of record in the Clerks Office of the Circuit
Court of Roanoke County, Virginia in ®Salem, Virginia
as shown on attached Exhibit "A".
2) The Petitioner(s) desires that ~ T~'^ T
s h ~._,~
all concerned.
6) The aforementioned road, your petitioner(s) are seeking
to have closed has never been improved and/or opened
for public use.
THEREFORE, your petitioner(s) respectfully request that the
above described ® Jones Street Right of Way
be permanently vacated, discontinued and closed.
Respectfully submitted,
(P titioner)
(Petitioner)
i
L ~~ ~~~~~
~~ ~P
VIRGINIA: ~r~:,'`'. ~~', ':;; ,~
BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNT
f 1 ~
A 1.085 acre parcel of land, ) -r} ~ ~-/ ~ ,' ~~,~~
j~ 4 ~ r ._ C~:,
generally located Tract B, of ) :; _ ~~, . ~,x ~U'
Section 1, Block 1 of Dwight Hills ) ,:_ ~~F`~~~ ~~~Z
within the Catawba ) PETITION
Magisterial District, and )
recorded as parcel # 27.13 - 6 - 62 )
in the Roanoke County Tax Records.)
TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY:
WHEREAS, your Petitioner Jones & Jones Associates Architects
respectfully files this petition pursuant to Section 21-105 of the
Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance and in accordance with the Code of
Virginia of 1950, as amended, and would respectfully show the
following:
1) The Petitioner is the owner of the above-referenced parcel of
land.
2) The property is presently zoned under the provisions of the
Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance as B1 Office District
District.
3) The property is designated Transitional
in the Future Land Use Guide of the Roanoke County
Comprehensive Development Plan.
4) Your Petitioner now desires to have this property rezoned as
B2 General Commercial District on Lots 18-22
B3 Special Commercial Distri t on Tit District for the purpose of
15-17
Construction of a Vehic ~ ~br; .At; on F ;1 ; t nr~
COritTAn; ar,..c S nra
Page 2 of 2
WHEREFORE, your Petitioner respectfully requests that the Zoning
Ordinance of Roanoke County be amended and that the above-referenced
parcel of land be rezoned as set out in number 4.
FURTHER, your Petitioner requests that this petition be referred
by the Secretary to the Roanoke County Planning Commission for its
consideration and recommendation.
Respectfully submitted,
i..2 ~ -~ - ,.~
PETITIONER: PETER L. WILLIAMS
CASE NUMBER: 50-12/87
Planning Commission Hearing Date: December 1, 1987
Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: December 15, 1987
1. REQUEST
Petition of Peter L. Williams to rezone a 5.08 acre tract fran B-2, Business to
R-3, Residential to construct multifamily apartments, located at 7655A and 7655B
Marson Road within the Hollins Magisterial District.
2. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION
No one in opposition was present at the Planning Commission Public Hearing.
3. SIGNIFICANT IMPACT FACTORS
a. None.
4. PROFFERED CONDITIONS
a. Any proposed multifamily development of the remainder Looney tract will be
developed at no greater density than the proposed density for the 4.3 acre
tract.
b. The existing structure on the Williams tract will not be enlarged.
c. The existing structure will be operated as: (1) rental office, (2) apartment
for the resident manager of the apartment complex, (3) a community center for
the apartments, (4) a day care center.
d. The site plan submitted with the petition shall be in substantial conformity
with the develognent of the property.
5. OONY~IISSIONER'S MOTION, VOTE AND REASON
Mrs. Flippen moved to approve the petition with proffered conditions. The miotion
carried with the following roll call vote:
AYES: Flippen, Witt, Gordon, Jones, Winstead
NAYS: None
ABSENT: None
6. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE
a. None.
7. ATTACHMENTS
~ Concept Plan (8~" x 11">
Vicinity Map (8~" x 11")
Staff Report
Other:
Robert Stalzer, P nning Commission Secretary
I
I
N~~Tti
2
GENERAL NOTES:
1. PLEASE SEE SITE SURVEY
CARE WILL BE TAKEN TO PRESERVE
EXISTING LANDSCAPE FEATURES
AND IN THE DESIGN OF NEW
COMPLEMENTARY LANDSCAPING
3. RECREATIONAL AMENITIES WILL
INCLUDE PLAY AREA FOR
CHILDREN
i
~~ 4
~~ ,
;r - -. j :z
'' ~ __~ .1
~_:~
~ ~ ~ '~ i.~
I ~~
~ s
~ ~
--~
`~
I ,~ - _ .~
-i~
_- ~
L
!` ~~ ~L ~~
` ~~
I ~ ! --~ -
! .:~ -~
~~ ~-- ~ -C
_~~ .~` _ .
~ \ ~1 ~~
~ ~\ \ i \
~z~~-~
~ ~ .ti ~
•~
,~ ;
~`.
%~~
11 ~\ i P•,r,RSON ROAD
~~. ~,,~ ;
~ ~~~
.,- ,-
~,
~- i
i
,~ i
i /
0 25 50 100
-~~:- --
~:-~_~~
72-2 BEDROOM LIVING UNITS
6-12 UNIT GARDEN APARTMENT BUILDING
4.3+ ACRES TO BE DEVELOPED
16.7± UNITS/ACRE
100± PARKING SPA'~ES FOR CARS
HIGH GATE
ROAiJOY.E CN_''TY, VIRGItv'IA
PETER L. 1.::.LIAMS
PRELIt~IF:~~ ~~ ~;ITE PL~,N
C~CiOCEP ~, Iy87
~~ ~~.______,oy0.
M~~Oi Q `" `J~ ~ ~; S
'7~, d
~s
+owMUOO 4~,_ ,~Y ~ IIS N ~ ~g F
Q Z
_s
1'
Ca"r. RpS ~ S. BiSCAMNe
8
. _ `Ep . ~ptnP!~ ARQ(MORF,s`9fM~~
~s~ ~'~,\ ~ •~S~IMMEROEAN ' y
'b ~ ~ ~ a> ~~ t'srq,i ~
l 7 ~.y'~r ~ /:
~~4 $~~' ~ '~l~ -(J e
MfAOEY~V01
yJ ipy .~ ~ Q sro wF,~°;
r-- pn1' ~ S-u-\~u\~ME ~? b
-VICINITY MAP
..„.....
~.~
ROANOKE COUNTY Peter L Williams
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT B-2 'to R-3 with Special Exception
eye
/z~~.~~;
STAFF REPORT
CASE NUMBER: 50/12-87 PETITIONER: PETER L. WILLIAMS
REVIEWED BY: ROB STALZER DATE: NOVEMBER 25, 1987
Petition of Peter L. Williams to rezone a 5.08 acre tract from B-2,
Business to R-3, Residential to construct multifamily apartments,
located at 7655A and 7655B Marson Road within the Hollins Magisterial
District.
1. NATURE OF REQUEST
a. Conditional request to construct six 12 unit apartment buildings
on 4.3 acres. The remaining acreage currently has two single
family homes. One home will continue to be used as a residence
by co-petitioner, Margie Looney. The other house owned by Peter
Williams will be used for the following purposes: a rental
office, an apartment for the resident manager of the complex, a
community center for the apartments, and a day care center.
Eventually, additional multifamily development may also be built
on the remaining Looney property at a density not to exceed the
density proposed for the primary 4.3 acre tract. The proposed
density for the 4.3 acre tract is 16.7 units per acre. An
additional 13 units may be built at the density of 16.7 units
per acre on the .78 acre remaining portion of the property. It
is conceivable that a total of 85 units could be eventually
constructed on the total 5.08 acres. The extent of the day care
facility has not been defined.
b. Attached concept plan and zoning vicinity map describe project
more fully. Concept plan shows only proposed multifamily
residential development for the 4.3 acres. Park facilities and
day care center have not been shown.
2. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS
a. R-3 zoning district permits a wide variety of residential uses
and some institutional uses as well as nursery schools and day
care centers and residential human care facilities. Petitioner
has specified by proffer the multifamily uses to be conducted on
the property.
b. Site plan review will be required to insure compliance with
County regulations.
c. VDOT commercial entrance permit required. A minimum of 55 feet
of road frontage is required for a commercial entrance permit.
Currently the petitioner has only 33 feet of frontage. To
obtain an entrance permit, petitioner will have to investigate
the possibilities of buying land to increase frontage, or
upgrading an additional section of Marson Road to VDOT's
standards, or constructing a cul-de-sac. Any commercial
development will have to adhere to these standards.
/2~'
d. Co-petitioner, Margie Looney, intends to live in her home for an
unspecified future period of time. Currently her house is a
legal nonconforming use and is subject to the stipulations
pertaining to the enlargement or replacement of nonconforming
uses defined in Sec. 21-100 of the Roanoke County Zoning
Ordinance. If the property is rezoned to R-3, the Looney home
will become a legal conforming use.
3. SITE CHARACTERISTICS
a. Topography: Flat.
b. Ground Cover: Two existing residential units and mature tree
cover.
4. AREA CHARACTERISTICS
a. Future Growth Priority: Situated within the Hollins Community
Planning area, future growth encouraged. Urban services
available.
b. General area is densely developed with existing multifamily
elderly housing, industrial, and commercial development.
5. LAND USE IMPACT ASSESSMENT
Rating: Rate each factor according to the impact of the proposed
action. Use a scale of 1 through 5.
1 = positive impact, 2 = negligible impact, 3 = manageable impact,
4 = disruptive impact, 5 = severe impact, and N/A = not applicable.
RATING FACTOR COMMENTS
2
2
2
3
LAND USE COMPATIBILITY
a. Comprehensive Plan: 1985 Comprehensive Development Plan has
placed this area within a Core land use category. The
petitioner's request conforms with both the land use plan map
and defined policies. Multifamily residential use at a very
high density of 12-24 units per acre is encouraged to locate
within Core areas. Policy C-6 encourages the placement of high
density residential development in Core areas with the intent of
encouraging infill of developable land where retail development
is not feasible.
b. Surrounding Land: Includes elderly and adult home facilities as
well as an existing mobile home park and commercial development.
c. Neighboring Area: Development around the intersection of
Plantation Road and Williamson Road includes Hollins College,
Jamison Industrial Park and densely developed single and
multifamily residential. A large tract of vacant land is
located east of subject parcels adjacent to Hollins College.
d. Site Layout: Property is not visible from either Plantation or
Williamson Road. Site layout is adequate. Site plan review
will require compliance with Sec. 21-22-4F Open Space that will
require a minimum of 25 percent of total lot area to be left
undeveloped. Petitioner is proposing the construction of 72
units of 2 bedrooms each on 4.3 acres. The zoning ordinance
will allow the construction of 113 2 bedroom apartment units at
a density of 26 units per acre. Concept plan does not show
layout of day care facility or park and recreation facilities.
3 /,2 ~.~
e. Architecture: Not specified.
2 f. Screening and Landscape: As per ordinance .
? g. Amenities: Recreational amenities will
children (secured by proffer) include play area for
. Site will
facility. Adequate parking shown. also include day care
2 h. Natural Features: No negative effect.
TRAFFIC
3 i. Street Capacities: Anticipated traffic
vehicle trip ends generation will be 475
per day, or 110.5 tri en
equivalent to 11.1 single family unitsp ds
p
r a
per
Williamson Road is 16,737 vehicles. ac
e
Current ADT on
3 j. Circulation: Although the site is wel
arterial highways that hav l served by existing
e recently been
at the intersection of Marson and Will improved, congestion
iam
increased significantly. It is anticipated
traffi son roads will be
, however
that mo
t
c exiting the complex will be
Williamson Road and will ,
s
traveling south on
not have to make a left hand turn
across traffic.
UTILITIES
2 k. Water: Adequate supply and distribution.
2 1. Sewer: Adequate treatment and transmission.
DRAINAGE
? m. Basin: No problems noted.
N/A n. Floodplain:
PUBLIC SERVICES
? o. Fire Protection: Within established service standard.
? p. Rescue: Within established service standard.
3 q. Parks and Recreation: Petitioner is proposing on site park
facilities
3 r. School:
- Space: If 72 two bedroom units are constructed, it is
anticipated that there will be 11 school age residents. The
elementary, junior high and high school facilities serving North
Roanoke County have adequate capacity to accommodate these
students.
- Costs: Estimated cost for educating one schoolchild per year
is $3,715. Of this amount, $1,796 is local funds. Total local
cost to education 11 students is approximately $20,000.
Difference between total costs and total revenue is - $1,600
6
/~~~~'
4 TAX BASE
s• - Land and Improvement Value: $1.6 million
- Taxable Gross Sales/Year: 0
- Total Employees: 5
- Total revenue to the County/Year: Approximately $18,400
The Economic Development Division notes that the area of Marson
Road is surrounded by high tech facilities and businesses. It
is the logical location for support facilities and back office
expansions of these companies to eventually locate. In
addition, the development of multifamily units through the
rezoning of this property is inconsistent with the goals and
objectives of the Economic Development Strategy as adopted in
October 1987.
ENVIRONMENT
? t. Air:
? u. Water:
2 v. Soils:
? w. Noise:
3 x. Signage: Not specified.
6. PLAN CONSISTENCY
This area is designated as Core. The proposed use is consistent
with both the land use map and the defined policies.
7. STAFF EVALUATION
a. Strengths: (1) Proposal is consist
policies. (2) Proposal is consistent
(3) Development will be served by
adequate utilities. (4) On site
proposed. (5) Day care facilities
area are logical.
ent with the land use map and
with surrounding land uses.
arterial highway system and
recreational facilities
near an existing industrial
b. Weaknesses: (1) Traffic generation will be increased
substantially. (2) Petitioner has not specified site layout for
future multifamily development. (3) Extent of day care operation
has not been defined. (4) The cost of educating the
schoolchildren anticipated will exceed the expected revenues
from the project.
F~ Ar
~~ecLs
-~, s~ o. e~ mss, r-~c.
~'p. V npryd 24O8p.0026
HIGHGATE
ROANOKE COUNTY VIRGINIA
PETER L. WILLIAMS.
BUILDING ELEVATIONS
OC`T'OBER 28th 1987.
...:..:s: '^-.z of a.. .sraixr
i ........-. ~ - .. ` ,~. - .. . l N ,-r... ... ....
L
d
-•?'~;r
~;:~:
~_ S-~~GA Architects
~~.
,~~~,~ , S ~Z' s Assoc~etes, t-~c.
[3~vJC.=;a~-~, v~-r.~~ 24060-0026
it
c~
L.i
-- ,
pS
r
~~ 1
J
~? a
v
HIGH GATE
ROANOY,E COUNTY, VIr ~INIA
PETER L. WILLIA~IS
SECOND 8 THIRD FL ~~ PLANS
OCTOEEP, 28, 1987
/~2~?_~
^STERHOUOT, FERGLISON
NATT, AHERON & AGEE
ATTORNEYS-AT-LA'N
ROANOKE, VIRGINIA
24018-tfi99
VIRGINIA:
BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY
-------------------------------------------
IN RE:
A 5.08 acre parcel of land, j
generally located at 7655A and 7655B )
Marson Road, within the Hollins )
Magisterial District, and recorded as )
Parcel # _ __, in the Roanoke )
County Tax Records )
RECOMMENDATION
--------------
TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY:
WHEREAS, your Petitioner, Peter Williams, has
filed with the Secretary to the Planning Commission a
petition to rezone the above-referenced parcel of land from
B-2, General Commercial District to R-3, Multi-Family
Residential District for the purpose of the construction of
a multi-family garden apartments.
WHEREAS, the petition was referred to the Planning
Commission which, after due legal notice as required by
Section 15.1-431 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as
amended, did hold a public hearing on December 1, 1987; and
WHEREAS, at that public hearing all parties in
interest were afforded an opportunity to be heard; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due
consideration has recommended to the Board of County
Supervisors that the rezoning be granted.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning
Commission recommends to the Board of County Supervisors
that the above-referenced parcel of land be rezoned to R-3,
^STERHDIrDT, FERGIJSON
NATT, AHERDN & AGEE
ATTORNEYS-AT-LAN
ROANOKE, VIRGINIA
24D1S-1fi99
z ,g
Multi-Family Residential District, subject to the proferred
conditions. The above action was adopted on motion of
Ms. Flippen, and upon the following recorded vote:
AYES: Ms. Flippen, Mr. Gordon, Mr. Witt, Mr. Winstead,
and Mr. Jones
NAYS:
ABSENT : ~(0 ~~r" ~ ~ Z/ ~ ~"7
r1.e14c.c
2
/ -~- ~-,"
(V
'--i
~-
z
w
~-
0
0
~--
0
w
0
a
Q
OSTERHDUDT, FERGUSDN
NATT, AHERON & AGEE
AT70RNEYS-AT-LAN
RDANOKE, VIRGINIA
24018-1699
VIRGINIA:
BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY
---------------------------------------
IN RE:
A 5.08 acre parcel of land, ~ FINAL ORDER
generally located at 7655A and 7655B )
Marson Road, within the Hollins )
Magisterial District, and recorded as )
Parcel # _ __, in the Roanoke )
County Tax Records )
TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY:
WHEREAS, your Petitioner, Peter Williams, did
petition the Board of County Supervisors to rezone the
above-referenced parcel of land from B-2, General Commercial
District to R-3, Multi-Family Residential District, for the
purpose of the construction of a multi-family garden
apartments.
WHEREAS, after due legal notice, the Planning
Commission did hold a public hearing of the petition on
December 1, 1987, at which time, all parties in interest
were given an opportunity to be heard; and
WHEREAS, after full consideration, the Board of
County Supervisors determined that the rezoning be approved
with the proffered conditions.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDERED that the
aforementioned parcel of land, which is contained in the
Roanoke County Tax Maps as Parcel and legally described
below, be rezoned from B-2, General Commercial District to
R-3, Multi-Family Residential District.
~ ~ ~ -,~`
OSTERHGUGT, FERGUSGN
NATT, AHER~N & AGEE
AT70RNEY5-AT-LAN
ROANGKE, VIRGINIA
24018-1699
A 5.08 acre parcel of land generally
located at 7655A and 76556 Marson Road,
within the Hollins Magisterial District,
and recorded as Parcel # _____ in
the Roanoke County Tax Records --~
with the following conditions:
(1) That any proposed multi-family development of
the remainder "Looney" tract (the portion not acquired by
Peter Williams) will be developed at no greater a density
than the proposed density of the apartments of Mr. Williams.
(2) That the existing structure will not be
enlarged.
(3) The existing structure on the Williams tract
will be operated as:
(a) a rental office for the apartments;
(b) apartment for the resident manager of
the apartment complex;
(c) a community center for the apartments;
and
(d) a day care center.
(4) That the site plan prepared by Richard A.
Gregory ~ Associates, Inc., and submitted with the Petition
shall be substantially conformed with in the development of
the property.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this order
be transmitted to the Secretary of the Planning Commission
2
/.2 '"~-
and that he be directed to reflect that change on the
Official Zoning Map of Roanoke County.
ADOPTED on motion of Supervisor
seconded by Supervisor
following recorded vote:
AYES:
NAYES:
ABSENT:
and upon the
Deputy Clerk, Roanoke County
Board of Supervisors
OSTERHOUOT, FERGUSON
NATT, AHERON & AGEE
ATTORNEYS -AT- LA'N
ROANOKE, VIRGINIA
24018-tfi99
r1.e14d.c
3
VIRGINIA: ~~ ~'um ,
BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY
IN RE: )
A 5.08 acre parcel of land, )
generally located at 7655A and 76556 ) AMENDED
Marson Road, within the Hollins ) PROFFER OF
Magisterial District, and recorded as ~ CONDITIONS
Parcel # _ __, in the Roanoke )
County Tax Records )
TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY:
r\
N
,--i
z
w
z
0
v
0
~-
0
w
0
a
a
Being in accord with Sec. 15. I-491. I et seq, of
the Code of Virginia and Sec. 21-105 of the Roanoke County
Zoning Ordinance, the Petitioner, Peter Williams, hereby
voluntarily proffers to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, the following conditions to the rezoning
of the above-referenced parcel of land.
(1) That any proposed multi-family development of
the remainder "Looney" tract (the portion not acquired by
Peter Williams) will be developed at no greater a density
than the proposed density of the apartments of Mr. Williams.
(2) That the existing structure will not be
enlarged.
(3) The existing structure on the Williams tract
will be operated as:
(a) a rental office for the apartments;
(b) apartment for the resident manager of
OSTERHOl1OT, FERGLISGN
NATT, AHERON & AGEE
ATTGRNEYS-AT-LA'N
ROANOKE, VIRGINIA
24018-1fi99
the apartment complex;
(c) a community center for the apartments;
and
(d) a day care center.
,~
(4) That the site plan prepared by Richard A.
Gregory S Associates, Inc., and submitted with the Petition
shall be substantially conformed with in the development of
the property.
Respectfully submitted,
Peter Williams
By-- s~~ _~~"
O f o u n~-`'~_-------
sel
Edward A. Natt, Esquire
Osterhoudt, Ferguson, Natt,
Aheron >i Agee, P.C.
1919 Electric Road, S.W.
Roanoke, VA 24018
Counsel for Petitioner
r1.e14b.c
^STERH~UOT, FERGUSON
NATT, AHERON & AGEE
AT70RNEY5-AT-LAW
ROANOKE, VIRGINIA
24018-1b99
2
15
A P P E A R A N C E R E Q U E S T
PUBLIC HEARING ON ~ ~ ~'; ~_ C~ ~j . C; $~ GC C',~.~. ~'Z_~ ~ ~ -
. G~ /~._ 1
I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to
recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so
that I may comment. I agree to follow the guidelines listed
below. WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND
ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD.
1. Each speaker will have between three and five minutes
available whether speaking as an individual or
representative. The chairman will decide the time limit
based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and
will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of
the Board to do otherwise.
2. Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of
view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by
the Chairman.
3. All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between
a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed.
4. Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all
times .
5• Speakers are requested to leave any written statements
and/or comments with the clerk.
6. INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL
FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP
ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM.
P L E A S E W R I T E L E G I B L Y
NAME:
i C'~~1Gt~_ 1 ~~;~
,~
r~G:~,C, ~' 2 C ~`J
ADDRESS : ~~ (~~
v~
PHONE:
PLEASE NOTE: (After filling out, give to the Deputy
Clerk. Thank you.)
~z ~ ~~- .
PETITIONER: FRALIN AND WALDRON INC.
CASE ~: 49-12/87
Planning Commission Hearing Date; December 1, 1987
Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: December 15, 1987
1 • RDQI.TEST
Petition of Fralin and Waldron Inc, to rezone a 2.5 acre tract from R-1
Residential to B-1, Business to construct a
side of Route 419 immediately south of its intersection with Rea on the west
the Windsor Hills Magisterial District. 9Y Road within
2. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION
There were four in opposition at the Planning Commission Public Hearin .
Concerns are: increased traffic onto Keagy Roads noise; stormwater drainage. g
3. SIGNIFICANT IMPACT FACTORS
a. Screening and Landscape: Petitioner's request includes the rezoning of a
strip of land zoned R-l, 50 feet wide, located along the southern and western
boundaries. This strip was reserved during the rezoning initiated in 1976
and was intended to serve as a buffer strip between the office use and
adjoining residential properties. Petitioner's r
equest complies with the
current ordinance screening and buffering regulations. However, the
reduction of the 50 foot buffer strip contradicts the intent stated in 1976.
City of Salem requests the placement of a
vehicles from view of adjacent houses. berm °r equivalent to screen
4 • ~O~'FERED CONDITIONS
a• ~'~ to be utilized for surface vehicular parking only.
b. No entrance from the proposed parking area directly to Keagy Road.
c• ~ signage on property.
d. Lighting will be directly internally on the property and not exceed 14 fee
in height. t
e. TYPe B screening will be installed along Keagy Road to shield parking lot
from view.
5. CODM4ISSIONER'S MOTION, VOTE AND REASON
Mr. Gordon moved to approve the petition with
carried with the following roll call vote: Proffered conditions. The motion
AYES: Witt, Gordon, Jones, Winstead
NAYS: Flipperi
~5~1'1': None
6. DISSENTING PERSPDCTIVE
a. No dissenting perspective given.
7. ATTACHMENTS
Concept Plan (8~" x 11")
Vicinity Map (8~~~ x 11")
Staff Report
Other:
~ h~
n.,t..,,...~ ..~ _
G^
~ ~ ~ "~ ~'r ~ / ~ x
..+
~ _ ~ '
~, ~ ~
~ ~ , -,~ I
---" .. Q ~ PRo~ I o~
T
FR.Y~ ~ ~ ~ \\ \~ - ! v ~ i ~ ~~I I ,I~ I ,~ '~c;A~ .r.~Do1~.:
~ous~ ~ v ~ V 1 ~ ~ ~ I '~ Zot;E=
~ II 1
~ ~
FEPRE~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ \ ~ \1 ~ I J I j~~ ~ _ l
~ ~ ~ m ! ~_1
~ .~_
ZoI,J ~D ~m ~~ j~ ~ ~ ~' ~
0 ,o ~ i
R - I N ~ -' / ` x ~
,o -l 1~
~ ~~ I ~
_~ ~ ~ ;.
_ ,
~~ \ ' ~ ~~ 1 _ ` I
~- _~~ ~ N ~ ~ 1 i
~ ~.
.. ~ ~_ .. \
--r--
v \ ~\ ~ I ;
N \ 1 ~ N r
` \ -- ~. -' "~ N
-~ ~ ~ /i ~
~ \ \
~ ~
T _~ _
\ l ~~ s _`
. 4.SR c~°v . pljyl~~jSION~q ~ L,4~faU, ~ ~" - ~ ~. , ~i
\~ R
~. SK-7CN- 'A,
o. f ROFjSc~ PARI~Ir,JC~ LO?
~ ~ ,NA
~~' v N~v L4~ qe ~ '. DRoN - dTLrNTI c cam.
i ~ `-~At_~ l'~- 5 0
~ SurrruFV ~ ~,. -- . .
~pA r 3 °~ ~~P[ ~
.. ~ .
S~ qS _
oN° PAM ~ ~ ~ ~ti ~ ON ~ -~._ _ .. "~ /~
o (, ~ rt
_ - ,~ 1 DaL
y ~ CIR ~ ~ ~ r -` .~... tN '
F"~" ~ Q~ K
~ ~~~ oM po --c`- ~~ I ~~. r f
pit 7 /fi \ r ~+. ea... • , ~ s~,..o.,,;, 1
~QIDDpy ;'~ ,~ °vSUAEE f+~OMOirY%~'..:; ~> ~ ~ EpayEHS EF
r , CEU Q E ' j. .~M g i ~ ~ j~
,,.FA~j?ES 9 ~!.,, ,~ E cu~~ i
r )%.. r5t '~' •Tl.
p ~ ifl ~"FK
:i .w,HS. °
VICINITY MAP
2.43 At
1.76
Keogy
See Map 67.13
I"• 100'
of
v
~ 6 .. 4 3 11.90 Ac
OJC T,1 wo 3OIAc ~ D0
R-I 1.78 Ac J\
~ -
7. :
T See Map 67.10
10 O '~l~`' 1"• 100'
46.77Ac (D) ~ y
4z94Ac (CI y ROpd Lonsdale
- ~ Rood
R-I
Se ~ Map 67.10 ~
I • l00' Wynne Rood
Club Lane
R-I ~ 1
~~~//
l' RQ.
R-~
~~
_ ROANOKE COUNTY
°~ ~ DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT
,~
Fralin and Waldron
R-1 to B-1
0
685
/ .;~
STAFF REPORT
CASE NUMBER; 49_12/87
REVIEWED BY: PETITIONER: FRALIN AND WALDRON INC.
ROB STALZER~~
Petition of DATE: NOVEMBER 25, 1987
Reside Fralin and Waldron
ntial Inc, to rezone a 2-
west side to B-1' Business
of Route 419 tO construct a 5 acre tract
Road within the immediatel Parkin from R-1,
Windsor Y south of its g area, located on the
Hills Magisterial intersection
1• NATURE OF RE District, with Keagy
a• Condi do al T
construction request to rezone a
will °f a Parking lot pproximately 2.5
serve the existin consisting of acres for
g Atlantic 130 s the
b• Attached Companies building, paces which
concept plan and zonin
more fully,
g vicinity map describe purpose
2• APPLICABLE REGULATIpNS
a• The
B'1 zonin
develo utI°pal g dlstrictwallows
uses a wide variet
pment, as ell as multifamily of °ffice
that of a Petition secured and
parking lot, by proffers limitsetheenti~o
b• Site plan use
Count review will be re
c• y regulations, quired to insure compliance wi
VDOT commercial th
existing point of ent-ranee permit
access will will not be re
3• SITE CHARACTERISTICS be used, quired because
a• Topography; Flat.
b• Ground
Cover:
4• Low growing shrubs and small trees.
AREA CHARACTERISTICS
a• Future Growth
Communi t Priority: Si tuated
Commercial Planning area, within
infill designated f the Windsor Hills
encouraged urban o r s t a b l e
b• General service available, growth
arterial area is predo
hi hwa urinated by heavil
develo g y' an existin
pment and the g hospital Y traveled four lane
family develo Atlantic facility, a
pment is also Companies. Lower planned unit
5• LAND USE In the area aloe density single
IMPACT ASSESSMENT g Keagy Road.
Rating; Rate
action. each factor
Use a scale accordi n
4 = Positive impact 2f 1 through 5•g to the impact of the
= disruptive ~ - negligible proposed
impact, S = severe Impact, 3
impact. and N/A manogeable impact,
applicable,
~-~8 ~- to
RATING FACTOR
COMMENTS
LAND USE COMPATIBILITY
3 a. Comprehensive Plan: 1985 Comprehensive Development Plan has
placed this area within both the Transition and Neighborhood
Conservation land use designations. Petitioner's request corre-
sponds with the policies contained within the Transition land
use category but does not conform to the intent of the Neighbor-
hood Conservation policies. Note that the impact of a parking
lot (assuming proper design) is far less than that of a building.
3 b. Surrounding Land: Single family residential and planned unit
residential. Lighting height, direction and intensity should be
specified.
2 c. Neighboring Area: Intensely developed with an existing
hospital, planned unit development/shopping center and existing
single family housing. Property is within 300 feet of Rt. 419.
3 d. Site Layout: Existing entrance to be used for access into
proposed parking area. No new entrances will be constructed
(secured by proffers). Parking lot landscaping, specifically
perimeter and interior landscaping has not been shown. The
location of the parking lot to the rear of the Atlantic
Companies building is desirable.
N/A e. Architecture:
4 f. Screening and Landscape: Petitioner's request includes the re-
zoning of a strip of land zoned R-1, 50 feet wide, located along
the southern and western boundaries. This strip was reserved
during the rezoning initiated in 1976 and was intended to serve
as a buffer strip between the office use and adjoining
residential properties. Petitioner's request complies with the
current ordinance screening and buffering regulations. However,
the reduction of the 50 foot buffer strip contradicts the intent
stated in 1976. City of Salem requests the placement of a berm
or equivalent to screen vehicles from view of adjacent houses.
3 g. Amenities: See comments under item d.
2 h. Natural Features: No negative effect.
TRAFFIC
2 i. Street Capacities: Little additional traffic will be generated
by the improvements. Primary purpose of the parking lot is to
accommodate existing employees; however, petitioner anticipates
the addition of 55 more employees in the near future.
Therefore, the construction of the parking lot will accommodate
the generation of approximately 110 additional vehicle trip ends
per day.
2 j. Circulation:
UTILITIES
N/A k. Water:
Existing entrance will be used.
N/A 1. Sewer:
DRAI NAGE
2 m. Basin: No negative effects anticipated. Stormwater management
will be required.
N/A n. Floodplain:
PUBLIC SERVICES
2 0. Fire Protection: Within established service standard.
? p. Rescue: Within established service standard.
N/A q. Parks and Recreation:
N/A r. School:
1 TAX BASE
s. - Land and Improvement Value: $28,200
- Taxable Gross Sales/Year: 0
- Total Employees: Approximately 400
- Total revenue to the County/Year: Approximately $325;
however, this improvement encourages the retention of an
existing business that employs approximately 400.
ENVIRONMENT
2 t. Air:
2 u. Water:
2 v. Soils:
2 w. Noise:
2 x. Signage: No signage will be installed on the parking lot as
stated in the proffer of conditions.
6. PLAN CONSISTENCY
This area is designated as both Transition and Neighborhood
Conservation land use categories. The petitioner's request is
consistent with the policies contained within the Transition land
use category and inconsistent with the policies contained within the
Neighborhood Conservation category. Note that the portion
designated as Transition was intended to be retained as a buffer as
determined during the rezoning approved in 1976.
7. STAFF EVALUATION
a. Strengths: (1) Proposed use is unobtrusive and if designed
properly may still function as a buffer between existing
residential area and insurance office. (2) Use has been limited
to that of a parking lot. (3) Entrance to site will be limited
to the existing point of access. (4) No signs will be placed on
the property. (5> Additional parking will benefit an existing
major Roanoke Valley employer.
b. Weaknesses: (1) Proposal negates the intent stated in 1976 to
maintain a buffer strip 50 feet wide along the southern and
western boundaries of the property. (2) Proposal conflicts with
policies contained within the Neighborhood Conservation
category. (3) Lighting height, direction and intensity should be
specified.
i z,~ ~- ~
OSTERHDUDT, FERGU50N
NATT, AHERON & AGEE
ATTORNEYS-AT-LAW
ROANOKE, VIRGINIA
24018-1699
VIRGINIA:
BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY SUPERVISORS_OF_ROANOKE_COUNTY
IN RE: )
RECOMMENDATION
A 2.5 acre parcel of land, generally )
located as a portion of and adjacent )
to the rear (west) property line of the)
Atlantic Cos. tract, within the Windsor)
Hills Magisterial District, and )
recorded as Parcel #67.00-I-2 in the )
Roanoke County Tax Records )
TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY:
WHEREAS, your Petitioner, FRALIN AND WALDRON,
INC., has filed with the Secretary to the Planning
Commission a petition to rezone the above-referenced parcel
of land from R-1, Single Family Residential District to B-1,
Office District for the purpose of an accessory parking
area.
WHEREAS, the petition was referred to the Planning
Commission which, after due legal notice as required by
Section 15.1-431 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as
amended, did hold a public hearing on December 1, 1987; and
WHEREAS, at that public hearing all parties in
interest were afforded an opportunity to be heard; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due
consideration has recommended to the Board of County
Supervisors that the rezoning be granted.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning
Commission recommends to the Board of County Supervisors
f ~ ~."
that the above-referenced parcel of land be rezoned to B-1,
Office District, subject to the proferred conditions. The
above action was adopted on motion of Mr. Gordon, and upon
the following recorded vote:
AYES: Mr. Gordon, Mr. Witt, Mr. Winstead and Mr. Jones
NAYS: Ms. Flippen
ABSENT:
~N 1`ZI~~~6~
OSTERHOUDT, FERGUSON
NATT, AHERDN & AGEE
ATTORNEY5-AT-LAW
ROANOKE, VIRGINIA
24018-1699
r1.e12b.c
2
/~~~-
VIRGINIA:
BEFORE_THE_BUARD_OF_COUNTY_SUPERVISORS_OF_ROANOKE COUN
IN RE:
A 2.5 acre parcel of land, enerall ) FINAL O_R_D_ER_
located as a portion of andgadjacent )
to the rear (west) property line of the)
Atlantic Cos, tract, within the Windsor)
Hills Magisterial District, and
I~ recorded as Parcel #67.00-I-2 in the )
Roanoke County Tax Records ) )
~ TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY:
4
~ WHEREAS
your Petitioner, FRALIN AND WALDRON,
z INC., did petition the Board of County Supervisor
° the above-referenced parcel of land from R_~ s to rezone
° Single Family
~ Residential District to B- '
`" 1, Office District,
for the
o purpose of an accessory parking area.
O
~ WHEREAS, after due legal notice, the Planning
Q
Commission did hold a public hearing of the petition o
December ~, n
1987, at which time, all parties in interest
were given an opportunity to be heard; and
WHEREAS, after full consideration,
County Supervisors determined that the rezo the Board of
with the proffered conditions, Wing be approved
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDERED
that the
^5TERHOUDT, FERGUSDN
aforementioned parcel of land, which is contained in t
NATT, AHERON & AGEE he
A77DRNEYS-A7-LAW Roanoke COUnt
y Tax Maps as Parcel
RDANOKE, VIRGINIA 6 7, U Q-~- 2 a nd I ega I I
24018-1699 described be I ow, y
be rezoned from R-1, Single Family
Residential District to B-1, Office District.
~...2 -°~--..
USTERHOl1DT, FERGLISDN
NATT, AHERDN & AGEE
AT70RNEYS-A7-LAN
ROANOKE, VIRGINIA
24 018-16 9 9
~,
r
A 2.5 acre parcel of
located as a land, generally
the rear Portion of and adjacent to
Atlantic CoseSt) property line of the
Hills Magisterial Distr'ict'n the Windsor
as Parcel #67.00-I-2 in the RoanokecCounty
Tax Records
with the following conditions:
(I) Area to be utilized for surface vehicular
parking only,
(2) No entrance from the proposed parking area
directly to Keagy Road.
(3) No signage on property.
(4) Lighting will be directed inward on
to exceed fourteen Iq poles not
( ) feet in height.
(5) Petitioner will use type B screening alon
the property line and Kea g
gy Road.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this order
be transmitted to the Secretary of the Plannin
and that he g Co-nmission
be directed to reflect that change on the
Official Zoning Map of Roanoke County,
ADOPTED on motion of Supervisor Garrett
seconded by Supervisor Brittle --~
following -----------------' and upon the
recorded vote:
OYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, John
AYES. None son
1BSENT: None
Deputy Clerk, Roanoke County
1.e12c.c. Board of Supervisors
CC: Rob Stalzer, Director of Planning
Arnold Covey, Development Review Director
John Willey, Real Estate Assessor
VIRGINIA;
BEFORE-THE BOAR / ~ _ ~r.
---- -----___~_~F_COUNTY-SUPERVISORS-OF-ROANOKE-COUNTY
IN RE: --
) PROFFER OF
A 2.5 acre parcel of land ) CONDITIONS
located as a portion of andgadjacent )
to the rear (west p P )
Atlantic Cos. tract ro erty line of the)
Hills Magisterial Districtn the Windsor)
recorded as Parcel and )
Roanoke Count #67'00-I-2 in the )
y Tax Records.
cV
~-
z
w
~-
z
0
U
0
Q
0
w
O
tY
C1
Q
U5TERH000T, FERGUSON
NATT, AHERON & AGEE
AT70 R N EY5-AT- LA ly
ROANGKE, VIRGINIA
24018-ifi99
TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY:
Being in accord with 15.1-491.1
Sec, et se
the Code of Virginia and Sec, p• of
21-105 of the Roanoke County
Zoning Ordinance,
the Petitioner, Fralin and Waldron, Inc.,
hereby voluntaril
y proffers to the Board of
Supervisors of
Roanoke County, Virginia, the following conditi
rezonin ons to the
g of the above-referenced parcel of land.
(I) Area to be utilized for surface vehicular
parking only,
(2) No entrance from the proposed parking area
directly to Keagy Road.
(3) No signage on property.
(4) Lighting will be directed inward on
to exceed fourteen (14 feet in Poles not
) height.
(5) Petitioner will use type g screening alon
the property line and Kea g
gy Road.
Respectfully submitted,
FRALIN AND WALDRON, INC.
By ~d~~~~ ~I
Of C ~ _-------
ounsel
VIRGINIA:
BEFORE THE BOARD OF Page 1 of 2
SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY
A 2•S± acre parcel of land,
generally located
as a portion of )
and ad jacent to r_he c+~estern
property line of the )
within the tiJindsor Hillsntic Cos. Property
) PET~ON
Magisterial District, and
recorded as parcels #
in the Roanoke County Tax Records.)
TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY:
WHEREAS, your Petitioner
Fralin and i~Talrlro
respectfully files this
petition pursuant to Section 2I-105 of
Roanoke Count the
Y Zoning Ordinance
and in accordance with the Code o£
Virginia of 1950, as amended, and would re
following; spectfully show the
1) The Petitioner is the
above-referenced owner and/or contract
parcel of land, purchas~r~.of the
2) The property is
presently zoned under the
Roanoke County Zonin Provisions of the
g Ordinance as
District. R-1
~) The pro ert
P y is designated Transitional
in the onservatzon and h'ei hb
Future Land Use Guide the
of Roanoke
Comprehensive Develo Count y
pment Plan.
4) Your Petitioner
now desires to have this property rezoned as
B-1
District for the purpose of
an accessor arkin
area
WHEREFORE Page 2 of 2
your Petitioner respectfully requests that the Zonin
Ordinance of Roanoke County be amended and that th 9
parcel of land be rezoned as set out in number 4. a above-referenced
FURTHER, your Petitioner re
quests that this petition be referred
by the Secretary to the Roanoke County Plannin
consideration and recommendation. g Commission for its
Respectfully submitted,
v
ITEM NUMBER
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
IN ROANOKE, VA., ON TUESDAY,
MEETING DATE:
December 15, 1987
SUBJECT: Petition vacating portion of a sanitary sewer easement
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
This proposed ordinance is to vacate the southern portion
(approximately 11.79 feet) of an existing 15 foot sanitary sewer
easement adjacent to original Lots 13, 14, Block 2, Kingston
Court. Refer to Exhibit "A".
Valley Developers, Inc. was required to adjust the lot lines
because of a house they built on Lot 11 encoached into Lot 12.
In shifting the lot lines the existing sanitary sewer easement
encroaches into new Lot 12A placing an encumberence on the
development of this lot. Refer to Exhibit "B".
FINAL IMPACT:~
fit'
None
RECOMMENDATION:
The Engineering Division reviewed and approved the petition
on the condition that the existing Manhole and cleanout be
shifted back into the limits of the new easement.
r
,SUBMITTED APPROVED:
~~, r
t~ 9
l P,rnold ove ` " G ~~
Elmer C. Hodge, Jr.
Development .Review irector County Administrator
~ =~.. ~ 7
..~ ~ .. ~
--------------------------------------
ACTION VOTE
Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs
Denied ( )
Received ( )
Referred
To
Brittle
Garrett
Johnson
McGraw
Nickens
r
~~, ,; ;,
1
!~I
~~.
~
-~ \ ~ ~ ~~~
p1 G)
SJ
~~
A ,,,,
a
~~
\
.,
6 ~ \Q
~ ";
~
' ~
VIRGINIA: ;
`~ .
.~
~
r
,~~~
~
BEFORE THE BOARD'OF SUPERVISO~S
OF ROANOKE COUNTY
RE: Vacation of Sanitary Sewer )
Easement on Lot 12/1, Section 2, )
Kingston Court ) PETITION
r TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY:
' Valley Developers, Inc. C. Dou las Dalton
YOUR PETITIONER(S), g
Pres.
respectfully files this Petition in accordance with
Section 15.1 - 482 (b) of the Code of Virginia, 1950,
as amended, and respectfully shows the following:
1. The subject property on record in the Clerks
Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia
in Plat Book 10, Page 58
is as shown on the
attached Exhibit "A".
2. The Petitioner desires that the sanitary sewer
easement shown on the survey plat of Lot #12A, Sec. 2
~Sinq~ton Court be permanently vacated, discontinued,
~
~ and closed.
3. The easement(s) which the petitioner seeks to
vacate is shown in red on the attached copy of the
plat.
4. Petitioner desires to vacate the encroaching
portions of the sanitary sewer
easement in order to relieve unneeded emcumberence
on said Lot 12A
and does not
believe such vacation would in any way be to the de-
triment of the interest of the County of Roanoke,
Virginia or of the public.
THEREFORE, your Petitioner(s) respectfully
requests that the above described sanitary sewer
easement be abandoned and vacated.
Respectfully submitted,
C~ ~~ eE~n
(Petit oner)
r
~.
WWWWW33W
U
Z = _ = z
M O~ r-I I~ V~ ~D N r'"1
W'. V'tAONrINNM
WQ, 1~1~NI~I~MrIN
Q1 MNOONONUI
~~
ao~~rnoo~
U n ~n~n~nNMn
~n ~nzzmmcnz
.. C~
W ~O <7'I~ONeiMM
~ uION~OM V'IAN
U ~ o rn~c a' o ul~
1!1 t!1 1!1 to d' N N O~
M1-1 OD d'f~MNO
U ri v M ~o .r o m r
a
~ ~-+Nrn~oa~~~nn
~ l0 l(1 U'1 U'f V1 N N Q~
Q
D C7 O~ O O I~ u'1 00 .-i el'
az .i O~ OD M CD r-~1 N M
W H ~naornao~,-rMrn
~ M N N N ep i-{ r-1 sr
U D 00000000
M O O O O O O O O
CaF~i~ oov~~n~n~nou~
i!1 ~(1 OD O N N
00
IA
N ~ N
____::
a OD W U1 m T tP U1''1
Mrl rl V~lANr-iM
t0 M ~O O 01 r1 lA OD
.~ o ~!1 O aT .-I M M
OOrIOaT OD O1T
n \O r'1 Nsr N•'1
rl
~ aaaocwwc~x
~h
~ ~o~ \4 ~.~"
CkK~
H
Ul a
' V
U fA
WM
O~
0
U
w z
a W
a ~a
~ !
'~
O~
s
~• 10.9 d 1ti~ ~; `
~c
r~~,
M [y pnp
1-1 .-.
n '~
a z
N H H H
.-i
H
N
a a ~
_
a~ O
~ ~
'~
a
zHH'~
w a N
Saw
°
ai ~H F
N
a
a ~1 H p
.
..
IA O
N
a C7
Hz
H ~H
a~oa~ao z
°a
aH
° °
a
u ac
~ o
~ ~
,Z
H x W
D ~ a ~ a o
i ,
W
Z
,
a p p
a H a
W 3
H ~ J_,
ci
d
g
~ ~ L
t
~ ¢ C
y >
I
W ¢ Y
O w Z4
~ i t
~ = Q
W
H
0
s
m
wOZ z°QQ
J~N y~'W
m W ~± .-~
~ L1J ~ .
~i ..
\ \ ~ (,i
L u. N \ •~ ~ ~ L O1 ~w .r rn ~o ~
6, S Q t~NMM
N r \ •~ ~ ` \ O J .i .~ rl ri
~' ti
_ a0 ~ ~ '20 ~ S~ /k~ J 'gyp ia~Na~ ~\ S,,
~N
a ~~ o i9'ao ~ "~ f "eJ ~Fy ~L ,409 °~ ~_ _ _ __ .:_ _..__ _
F 0 1 ~'' r' ' S
LL Z
LL
~ ~ J,_ ~; bl ~ S
0 3 ~ ~a
1
W ~!''~ ~ ~ l0'1
' ~ 0 1
o°t •~ ~ ~r a Z`• 6 i
.~
VIRGINIA: ,
BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROA'VOKE COUNTY
RE: Vacation of Sanitary Sewer )
Easemen on Lot 12A, Section 2 )
Kingston Court ) FINAL ORDER
TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY:
WHEREAS, your Petitioner, Valley Developers, Inc., C. Douglas Dalton
did petition the Board of County Supervisors to abandon and vacate a portion
of the 15 foot sanitary sewer easement(s) located
On original lots 13, 14, Block 2, Kingston Court, Section 2 ~
and
WHEREAS, after due legal notice, the Board of County Supervisors did
hold a public hearing on said request on December 15, 1987
at the Roanoke County Administration Center,
3738 Brambleton Avenue, Roanoke, Virginia, at which time all parties in
interest were given an opportunity to be heard, and
WHEREAS, after full consideration the Board of Roanoke County
Supervisors is of the opinion that the request should be granted.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDERED, that the approximately 11.79 feet sanitary
sewer
easement(s), hereinabove described above
on a plat attached hereto, be
permanently vacated and abandoned.
BE IT FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this order be transmitted to
the Department of Development and that this order be recorded by Petitioner
along with the attached plat among the land records of Roanoke County.
Adopted on motion of Supervisor
Garrett
and upon this following recorded vote:
Ayes Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson
~..~K1~3T'-
.,
wwwww33w
c7
H 0lrlyd'\ON~r"'~
Q ~Yt110Nr-INNM
W rr~nrrMr-IN
p~ MNOONONU'1
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
e--I l~ 00 l~ r 01 00 M
x r tf1 l11 lf1 N M r
U
~nv~zzcncncnz
L~ ~ov~roN~MM
O ~f10NlOMd'tf1N
x .
U rorn~v~o~nr
II1tf11I1tf1V'NN~
Mri00crrMNO
U M C' M l0 v~ O O r
a' ri N Q1 lD C' .-~ tll r
Q 1~111Ll1LnLf1NN~
H
~ C7 m o o r ~n oo ,-i ~r
r-i Ol 00 M 00 e-i N f"1
w H ~naornaor~Mrn
~ MN NNd'rirld'
~ t!1 - - - - - - - -
U D 00000000
H 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 ~~n ~n u~ o ~n
lIl lf1 00 O N N tIl O
N 'd' N
0o ao in w ~ ca ~n ~
W Mrlr-Id'111Ne-iM
C7 ~M~orn~~nao
~o~nov~~MM
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
oorloOV~oprnrn
r~H NcrN~
H
~~AUAWL*aC7x
>,
r
r-I -~ U FC ~ ~ j
CO H H rl
~ ,. a z a
~~
H ~
t
W
N C7 to H p4 D
~ a O H C7 ~
~
~ O ~ ~ V ~
' o ~ O ~
U (n H r-i • ~ H d' N } Z
H O U O LL~ W Q ~ ~
a w oa n. N w
--
~
~
>
m o ~ Pa a W ~ ~ ~
N ~ ~ O w
H ~-. H a H
y
w Z
w n o on ` a o ~ °
- Z O
c
H a U a U o -+ w
~ ~ ~ f"
H z x W
Q ~ Q O ~~
C
A ~ a
~ ~
~
~ _
0
c!1 C7 ~C ; ~
a ° LL
~ z a ~ m
w 3 "'
Ei .,.StA
~1,~~. ~
Z 'o ~"
N JO ~N~ ~
a ~W a~ ~»
' w p $4
~ ~ ~. ~ ~ a wwww
rd- 2 ~ ~~.y\ ~ 6,..y cn cn cn
r ~ ~~\ ~ o ~O~ ~ ~\ \~Jab ~/a Q ~ ~ N ~
o~ it N 0 ~ w v~rn~r
~ ~ ~
~ /~, ~~ Q rNMM
ern N \ -~ ~ J ~~.~~
'~ N
\ ~J ~
N '&
3 X11 c~ ~ ~ 0 ~ b, • ~ /1,
~ ~ .-
o~ ~ s ~ ~
rr(1 `~ ~ Z_
.Y~ ~ G ~i • ~ ~..r~ J ~1 S S \ ~ N
J
i i ~ 1 V ~
~~ •~a/ _._. a
~ ~ . A ~Q
W
H
A~ C]
V
O H
U cn
x
O
O
U
w z
.H
~ zz
~ W
a ~a
dl
7
O~
's
II n f/
`/
? ' o
~~' e ~ /
v. >? o. ti~
Y ~ ~~
~ _ ~ ~ .ll
4 `. . ~ ~_ ? J / ~,.
J
~ r %,
~4i ~ ~\~~ ae. ~~ /L,b1~rJ i~
A~Y~.
e,,
,~_ 22i ~~,a .
~~`J ~ a
:Q ~
LOGA~tO~ yyc
o ~~a~
ti cn o21GG;tiA~ ~oj 12
w ~ N r _ ~~~
~~' o e`~ tJfev~l Lot t2 A o~ O LP ~~ j
2 2 p~%
~~ ? 0 ~ ` ~, i 'l~l'
a ~ ~ a
. -~
~, ~ ~,
n
~~~ l~ol 13 A ,. ~ ~ fJ~vJ LoT 14 A
°' ' s . ii
~I ~ c 7i sEv~lE2 EAG~~.ME~J1 P.P~. ~o , PC~.58)
~ ~fi
~ ,~
~ ~ ~ o
'~
~1-.3~ ~o ~. ~ . _ _
" ~'~ ~2 ~ co~2~
_y~2~~s~
-. G~itPP~r.11~-IAM ~21~t~ , 5.1n~
50~ ~/~
PLAT SHOWING
PORTION OF EXISTING SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT
TO BE VACATED
BY
THE ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
6
~~ ~~
.,,, ~
~~ ~`
~o\
VIRGINIA: ,
;; ;;
BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISC3R$ OF ROANOKE COUNTY
RE: Vacation of Sanitary Sewer )
Easement on Lot 12/q, Section 2, )
Kingston Court ) PETITION
TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY:
YOUR PETITIONER(S), Valley Developers, Inc. C. Douglas Dalton,
Pres.
respectfully files this Petition in accordance with
Section 15.1 - 482 (b) of the Code of Virginia, 1950,
as amended, and respectfully shows the following:
1. The subject property on record in the Clerks
Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia
in Plat Book 10, Page 58 is as shown on the
attached Exhibit "A".
2. The Petitioner desires that the
sanitary sewer
easement shown on the survey plat of Lot #12A, Sec. 2
Kingston Court be permanently vacated, discontinued,
and closed.
3. The easement(s) which the petitioner seeks to
vacate is shown in red on the attached copy of the
plat.
4. Petitioner desires to vacate the encroaching
portions of th e sanitary sewer
easement in order to relieve unneeded emcumberence
on said Lot 12A and does not
believe such vacation would in any way be to the de-
triment of the interest of the County of Roanoke,
ITEM NUMBER ~-~ G ~--~
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
IN ROANOKE, VA., ON 'T'UESDAY,
MEETING DATE: December 15, 1987
SUBJECT: Public Hearing and Resolution pursuant to Section
15.1-238(e) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended,
setting forth the intent of Roanoke County to enter
upon certain properties and to take certain sanitary
sewer easements in connection with the Starkey Force
Main and Gravity Sewer Project
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
Section 15.1-238(e) provides for a notice and public hearing
by the Board of Supervisors to authorize immediate entry upon
real estate and condemnation thereof. In order to complete the
Starkey Force Main and Gravity Sewer Project, five sanitary sewer
easements must be condemned:
Ma r.ble Associates
Fair Market Value
Atlantic Concrete,
Fair Market Value
Atalantis Group, I
Fair Market Value
Robert C. Bell and
Fair Market Value
Fair Market Value
- $5,303.00
Inc.
- $3,456.00
nc.
- $100.00
Anne H. Bell (2 easements)
- $5,652.00
- $1,832.00
Notices by mail were given to the property owners in
question. These notices also included the offers of fair market
value as indicated by the appraisal reports. This procedure is a
necessary first step to commence condemnation proceedings.
Public notices of this public hearing were published in the
Roanoke Times and World News on December 1, 1987, and December 8,
1987.
FISCAL IMPACT : ~~
$16,343.00 plus legal costs and expenses for condemnation
~z~ ~
actions and expert witness fees. Utility Bond funds are being
used for the sanitary sewer acquisition.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the proposed resolution be adopted by
the Board after the required public hearing.
Respectfully submitted,
~,~
Paul M. Mahoney
County Attorney
------------------------------------------------------------------
ACTION VOTE
Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs
Denied ( ) Brittle
Received ( ) Garrett
Referred Johnson
To McGraw
Nickens
~ .~ ~~.g
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, DECEMBER 15, 1987
RESOLUTION PURSUANT TO SECTION 15.1-
238(e) OF THE 1950 CODE OF VIRGINIA, AS
AMENDED, SETTING FORTH THE INTENT OF
ROANOKE COUNTY TO ENTER UPON CERTAIN PRO-
PERTIES AND TO TAKE CERTAIN SANITARY
SEWER EASEMENTS IN CONNECTION WITH THE
STARKEY FORCE MAIN AND GRAVITY SEWER PRO-
JECT
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That the Starkey Force Main and Gravity Sewer Pro-
ject is being undertaken by the County of Roanoke to allow for
the elimination of the Starkey Sewage Treatment Plant and provide
for long-term sewer capacity for the Back Creek sewershed; and
2. That in order to complete this project, certain
sanitary sewer easements are needed and more particularly de-
scribed:
a . A f if teen (15 ) foot wide strip of
land across the property of Marble
Associates and more particularly
described on the attached appraisal
report as located on the north side-
line (from Ogden Road) and contain-
ing 3,495 square feet and being
shown on the attached plat prepared
by the Roanoke County Department of
Public Facilities dated June 1,
1987.
Together with a ten (10 ) foot wide
temporary construction easement
more particularly described on the
attached appraisal report as con-
taining 2,361 square feet.
The fair market value of the afore-
said interest to be acquired is
$5,303.00, such compensation and
damages, if any, having been
offered the property owners.
1
~ .~. ~ ~-~
b. A twenty (20) foot wide strip of
land across the property of
Atlantic Concrete, Inc. and more
particularly described on the
attached appraisal report as run-
ning the full length (approximately
1,997.6 feet) of the northwest side
adjacent to the Norfolk Southern
Railroad right-of-way and contain-
ing 39,952 square feet and being
shown on the attached plat prepared
by the Roanoke County Department of
Public Facilities dated June 1,
1987.
Together with a ten (10) foot wide
temporary construction easement
more particularly described on the
attached appraisal report as adja-
cent to the west side of the afore-
said permanent easement and contain-
ing 19,976 square feet.
The fair market value of the afore-
said interest to be acquired is
$3,456.00, such compensation and
damages, if any, having been
offered the property owners.
c. A twenty (20) foot wide temporary
construction easement across the
property of the Atalantis Group,
Inc. and more particularly des-
cribed on the attached appraisal
report as containing 500 square
feet and located about 22 feet west
of the left front corner of the
property as shown on the attached
plat prepared by the Roanoke County
Department of Public Facilities
dated June 1, 1987.
The fair market value of the afore-
said interest to be acquired is
$100.00, such compensation and dam-
ages, if any, having been offered
the property owners.
d.l. A twenty (20) foot wide strip of
land across the property of Robert
C. Bell and Anne H. Bell and more
particularly described on the
attached appraisal report as lo-
cated adjacent to the rear property
2
- i.~~~
line and containing 5,811 square
feet and being shown on the
attached plat prepared by the Roa-
noke County Department of Public
Facilities dated June 1, 1987.
Together with a ten (10 ) foot wide
temporary construction easement
more particularly described on the
attached appraisal report as being
adjacent to the aforesaid permanent
easement and containing 2,843
square feet.
The fair market value of the afore-
said interest to be acquired is
$5,652.00, such compensation having
been offered the property owners.
d.2. A twenty (20) foot wide strip of
land across the property of Robert
C. Bell and Anne H. Bell and more
particularly described on the
attached appraisal report as lo-
cated on the southwest front corner
of the property and containing 840
square feet and being shown on the
attached plat prepared by the
Roanoke County Department of Public
Facilities dated June 1, 1987.
Together with a ten (10)foot wide
temporary construction easement
more particularly described on the
attached appraisal report as being
adjacent to the permanent easement
and containing 775 square feet.
The fair market value of the afore-
said interest to be acquired is
$1,832.00, such compensation having
been offered the property owners.
2. That it is immediately necessary for the County to
enter upon and take such property and commence said sanitary
sewer improvements in order to replace the Starkey Sewage
Treatment Plant due to the economic infeasibility to upgrade the
plant to satisfy the proposed requirements and regulations of the
3
~z~~..,
State Water Control Board and provide long-term sewer capacity
for the health, safety, and welfare of its citizens and to
thereafter institute and conduct appropriate condemnation
proceedings as to said sanitary sewer easements; and
3. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 15.1-
238(e) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and pursuant to
notice and public hearing as made and provided therein, the Board
does hereby invoke all and singular the rights and privileges and
provisions of said Section 15.1-238(e) as to the vesting of
powers in the County pursuant to Section 33.1-119 through Section
33.1-129 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, all as made
and provided by law.
4
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, DECEMBER 15, 1987
RESOLUTION 121587-9 PURSUANT TO SECTION
15.1- 238(e) OF THE 1950 CODE OF
VIRGINIA, AS AMENDED, SETTING FORTH THE
INTENT OF ROANOKE COUNTY TO ENTER UPON
CERTAIN PROPERTIES AND TO TAKE CERTAIN
SANITARY SEWER EASEMENTS IN CONNECTION
WITH THE STARKEY FORCE MAIN AND GRAVITY
SEWER PROJECT
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That the Starkey Force Main and Gravity Sewer Pro-
ject is being undertaken by the County of Roanoke to allow for
the elimination of the Starkey Sewage Treatment Plant and provide
for long-term sewer capacity for the Back Creek sewershed; and
2. That in order to complete this project, certain
sanitary sewer easements are needed and more particularly de-
scribed:
a. A fifteen (15) foot wide strip of
land across the property of Marble
Associates and more particularly
described on the attached appraisal
report as located on the north side-
line (from Ogden Road) and contain-
ing 3,495 square feet and being
shown on the attached plat prepared
by the Roanoke County Department of
Public Facilities dated June 1,
1987.
Together with a ten (10) foot wide
temporary construction easement
more particularly described on the
attached appraisal report as con-
taining 2,361 square feet.
The fair market value of the afore-
said interest to be acquired is
$5,303.00, such compensation and
damages, if any, having been
offered the property owners.
b. A twenty (20) foot wide strip of
land across the property of
Atlantic Concrete, Inc. and more
particularly described on the
attached appraisal report as run-
ning the full length (approximately
1,997.6 feet) of the northwest side
adjacent to the Norfolk Southern
Railroad right-of-way and contain-
ing 39,952 square feet and being
shown on the attached plat prepared
by the Roanoke County Department of
Public Facilities dated June 1,
1987.
Together with a ten (10) foot wide
temporary construction easement
more particularly described on the
attached appraisal report as adja-
cent to the west side of the afore-
said permanent easement and contain-
ing 19,976 square feet.
The fair market value of the afore-
said interest to be acquired is
$3,456.00, such compensation and
damages, if any, having been
offered the property owners.
c. A twenty (20) foot wide temporary
construction easement across the
property of the Atalantis Group,
Inc. and more particularly des-
cribed on the attached appraisal
report as containing 500 square
feet and located about 22 feet west
of the left front corner of the
property as shown on the attached
plat prepared by the Roanoke County
Department of Public Facilities
dated June 1, 1987.
The fair market value of the afore-
said interest to be acquired is
$100.00, such compensation and dam-
ages, if any, having been offered
the property owners.
d.l. A twenty ( 20 ) foot wide strip of
land across the property of Robert
C. Bell and Anne H. Bell and more
particularly described on the
attached appraisal report as lo-
cated adjacent to the rear property
line and containing 5,811 square
feet and being shown on the
attached plat prepared by the Roa-
noke County Department of Public
Facilities dated June 1, 1987.
Together with a ten (10) foot wide
temporary construction easement
more particularly described on the
attached appraisal report as being
adjacent to the aforesaid permanent
easement and containing 2,843
square feet.
The fair market value of the afore-
said interest to be acquired is
$5,652.00, such compensation having
been offered the property owners.
d.2. A twenty ( 20 ) foot wide strip of
land across the property of Robert
C. Bell and Anne H. Bell and more
particularly described on the
attached appra isal report as lo-
cated on the southwest front corner
of the property and containing 840
square feet and being shown on the
attached plat prepared by the
Roanoke County Department of Public
Facilities dated June 1, 1987.
Together with a ten (10)foot wide
temporary construction easement
more particularly described on the
attached appraisal report as being
adjacent to the permanent easement
and containing 775 square feet.
The fair market value of the afore-
said interest to be acquired is
$1,832.00, such compensation having
been offered the property owners.
2. That it is immediately necessary for the County to
enter upon and take such property and commence said sanitary
sewer improvements in order to replace the Starkey Sewage
Treatment Plant due to the economic infeasibility to upgrade the
plant to satisfy the proposed requirements and regulations of the
State Water Control Board and provide long-term sewer capacity
for the health, safety, and welfare of its citizens and to
thereafter institute and conduct appropriate condemnation
proceedings as to said sanitary sewer easements; and
3. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 15.1-
238(e) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and pursuant to
notice and public hearing as made and provided therein, the Board
does hereby invoke all and singular the rights and privileges and
provisions of said Section 15.1-238(e) as to the vesting of
powers in the County pursuant to Section 33.1-119 through Section
33.1-129 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, all as made
and provided by law.
On motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by Supervisor
McGraw, and upon the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson
NAYS: None
A COPY - TESTS:
~.
Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
12/18/87
cc: File
Paul Mahoney, County Attorney
John Willey, Real Estate Assessor
Clifford Craig, Director of Utilities
John Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator
Phillip Henry, Director of Engineering
ITEM NUMBER ~ -2- <'`? r~~ •- ~1
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
IN ROANOKE, VA., ON TUESDAY,
MEE'1'ING DATE: December 15, 1987
SUBJECT: Ordinance pursuant to Sections 24.1-37 and 24.1-233.1
of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, authorizing
the relocation and establishment of the central absen-
tee voter election district in the Roanoke County Admin-
istration Center for all elections held within Roanoke
County
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
PLEASE NOTE: THIS ITEM WILL BE APPROVED
•~ ~"~....w! UNDER FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
'.1'he Board of Supervisors had designated the old Roanoke
County Courthouse as the central absentee voter election dis-
trict. As a result of the sale of the Courthouse and relocation
of the Registrar's Office, the central absentee voter election
district needs to be relocated. In a letter dated December 1,
1987, from Leonard M. Pick, Secretary of the Electoral Board of
Roanoke County, to Bob Johnson, the local electoral board recom-
mended moving the central absentee voter election district to the
Roanoke County Administration Center for all elections held with-
in Roanoke County.
Section 24.1-37 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended,
provides for the establishment and alteration of County election
districts or precincts. More specifically, Section 24.1-233..E
allows the governing body of each county to establish a centraJ_
absentee voter election district in the courthouse or other pub-
lic building upon passage of an ordinance.
The Code also provides that no change as aforementioned
shall be made within sixty (60) days next preceding any general_
election. A presidential primary general election will be held
on March 8, 1988. The second reading schedu.l.ed for January l_2,
1.988, would fall within sixty (60) days of the presidential prima-
ry. Therefore, pursuant to Section 18.04 of the Charter of Roa-
noke County, it is recommended that the second reading be waived
and the ordinance adopted as an emergency measure.
FISCAL IMPACT:
,~ .1
'~ This change of location of the central absentee voter elec-
tion district requires no additional funding. The cost asso-
ciated with the relocation of any other County offices will be
i ~
.t - ~y
i
o.~ ~.
covered by a separate appropriation at a later date.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff makes the following recommendations:
1. That the Board of Supervisors adopt the proposed ordin-
ance as an emergency measure.
2. That the County Admi.ni_strator execute such documents and
take such action on beha]_f of Roanoke County as are necessary to
accomplish this relocation; all of which shall be upon form ap-
proved by the County Attorney.
Respectfully submitted,
~)
1 t r ~`~..~~•,~_, ,L. •~ i
i
Paul M. Mahoney
County Attorney
------------------------------------------------------------------
ACT I ON VO`.CE
Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs
Denied ( ) Brittle
Received ( ) Garrett
Referred Johnson
~'o McGraw
Nickens
n~ ,
N O T I C E
Please take notice that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia, at the County Administration Center, Community Room, 3738 Bramble-
ton Avenue, will, on December 15, 1987, at the evening session beginning at
7:00 p.m., hold a public hearing on the question of the adoption of a reso-
lution pursuant to Section 15.1-238(e) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as
amended, concerning acquisition by Roanoke County of certain easements for
completion of the Starkey Force Main and Gravity Sewer Project, the same to
traverse certain properties located in the Cave Spring Magisterial District
of Roanoke County, being owned by Marble Associates, a Pennsylvania partner-
ship, and Atlantic Concrete, Inc., a North Carolina corporation, and
Atalantis Group, Inc., a Virginia corporation, and Robert C. Bell and Anne
H. Bell.
Any member of the public may appear at the time and place aforesaid
and address the Board on the matter aforesaid.
Paul M. Mahoney
County Attorney
Please publish as follows:
December 1, 1987 - morning edition
December 8, 1987 - morning edition
Please send bill to:
Board of Supervisors
P. 0. Box 29800
Roanoke, VA 24018-0798
L E G A L N O T I C E
Notice is hereby given to all interested persons that the
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at 7:00
p.m. on Tuesday, December 15, 1987, in the Community Room at the Roanoke
County Administration Center, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, S.W., Roanoke,
Virginia, on the petition of Fralin and Waldron, Inc., requesting
rezoning from R-1 Residential to B-1 Business of a tract containing 2.5
acres and located on the south side of Kagey Road approximately 1,000
feet west of its intersection with Route 419 in the Windsor Hills
Magisterial District.
Rezoning has been requested to construct a parking area. The
County Planning Commission will review this petition on December 1,
1987.
A copy of the Zoning Ordinance of Roanoke County and amendments
thereto as well as a copy of the petition, site plan, and other
documents related to this request may be examined in the office of the
Department of Development, located in Room 600 at the Roanoke County
Administration Center.
Roanoke County will provide assistance to handicapped persons
desiring to attend public hearings. Such individuals are requested to
contact the County office of Personnel Services ((703] 772-2018) if
special provisions are necessary for attendance.
Given under my hand this 25th day of November, 1987.
Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
Please publish in the evening edition
of the Roanoke Times and World News on:
Tuesday, December 1, 1987
Tuesday, December 8, 1987
Direct the bill for Publication to:
Edward Natt
P. O. Box 20068
Roanoke, Virginia 24018
L E G A L N O T I C E
Notice is hereby given to all interested persons that the
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at 7:00
p.m. on Tuesday, December 15, 1987, in the Community Room at the Roanoke
County Administration Center, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, S.W., Roanoke,
Virginia, on the petition of Jones and Jones Associates Architects,
requesting rezoning from B-1 Business to B-2 business and B-3 Business
of a tract containin 1.086 acres and located on the north side of Route
117 immediately Hof its intersection with T~ti~irr}r+- in the
---
Catawba Magisterial District. ~To~eS S-ff~~~-
Rezoning has been requested to construct a convenience store and
a vehicle lubrication facility. The County Planning Commission
will review this petition on December 1, 1987.
A copy of the Zoning Ordinance of Roanoke County and amendments
thereto as well as a copy of the petition, site plan, and other
documents related to this request may be examined in the office of the
Department of Development, located in Room 600 at the Roanoke County
Administration Center.
Roanoke County will provide assistance to handicapped persons
desiring to attend public hearings. Such individuals are requested to
contact the County office of Personnel Services ([7031 772-2018) if
special provisions are necessary for attendance.
Given under my hand this 25th day of November, 1987.
YY) cu.~. ~d .
Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
Please publish in the evening edition
of the Roanoke Times and World News on:
Tuesday, December 1, 1987
Tuesday, December 8, 1987
Direct the bill for Publication to:
Jones & Jones Associates Architects
2431 Ravenwood Avenue N. W.
Roanoke, Virginia
~ ~ y\Cv~~~~ (,~(i-'~
U
PUF3l .1 C iVCIPICE
Please take notice that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia, atr its meeting on the 15th day of December, 1987, at the Roanoke
County Administration Center, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, Roanoke, Virginia, at
the evening session beginning at 7:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as the
matter may be heard, will hold a public hearing and receive public comments
on the relocation of the central absentee voter precinct from the old
Roanoke County Courthouse located in Salem, Virginia, to the Roanoke County
Administration Center, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, Roanoke, Virginia, said cen-
tral absentee voter precinct will be used for all elections held within
Roanoke County.
All members of the public interested in the matter set forth above may
appear and be heard at the time and place aforesaid.
~~~ ~-1, ~~~~
Paul M. Mahoney ~,/
County Attorney of
Roanoke County, Virginia
Publish on the following dates in the morning edition:
DecE~mber 8, 1987
December 15, 1987
Send invoice to:
Board of Supervisors
P. O. I3ox 29800
Roanoke, Virginia 24018-0798
.,~' r,,~ y. a
L E G A L N O T I C E
Notice is hereby given to all interested persons that the
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at 7:00
p.m. on Tuesday, December 15, 1987, in the Community Room at the Roanoke
County Administration Center, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, S.W., Roanoke,
Virginia, on the petition of Valley Developers, Inc., requesting
vacation of sanitary sewer easement on lot 12A, Section 2, Kingston
Court in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District.
A copy of the Zoning Ordinance of Roanoke County and amendments
thereto as well as a copy of the petition, site plan, and other
documents related to this request may be examined in the office of the
Department of Development, located in Room 600 at the Roanoke County
Administration Center.
Roanoke County will provide assistance to handicapped persons
desiring to attend public hearings. Such individuals are requested to
contact the County office of Human Resources ([703) 772-2018) if special
provisions are necessary for attendance.
Given under my hand this 18th day of November, 1987.
Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
Please publish in the evening edition
of the Roanoke Times and World News on:
Tuesday, December 1, 1987
Tuesday, December 8, 1987
Direct the bill for Publication to:
Buford T. Lumsden & Associates
P. 0. Box 20669
Roanoke, Virginia 24018
L E G A L N O TIC E
Notice is hereby given to all interested persons that the
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at 7:00
p.m. on Tuesday, December. 15, .1987, in the Community Room at the Roanoke
County Administration Center, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, S.W., Roanoke,
Virginia, on the petition of Peter L. Williams, requesting rezoning from
B-2 Business to R-3 Residential of a tract containing. 5.08 acres and
located at 7655A and 7655B Marson Road in the Hollins Magisterial
District.
Rezoning has been requested to construct multi-family apartments.
The County Planning Commission will review this petition on December 1,
1987.
A copy of the Zoninq Ordinance of Roanoke~County and-amendments
thereto as well as a copy of the petition, site plan, and other
documents related to this .request may be:examined in the office of~the
Department of Development,. located in Room 600 at the Roanoke. County
Administration.Center.
:Roanoke~County will provide assistance to: handicapped persons
desiring to .attend .public .hearings. Such individuals are requested to
- contact: the County ,office of Personnel Services ([7031 772-2018)-if
s ecial rovisions .are. necessar for attendance. ~;~ :~ -~:
Given`: under~my~hand~this 25th day of November, 1987:
s
~E .... _. Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk ~ '
Roanoke°County Board of Supervisors
Please publish im~the evening edition
of the Roanoke-Times and World News on:
Tuesday, December:l,-198T
Tuesday, December 8, 1987
Direct the bill for Publication to:
Edward Natt
P. 0. Box 20068
Roanoke, Virginia 24018
LEGAL NOTICE
s rl,..
OSTERHOUOT, FEROUSON
NATT, AHERON & AOEE
ATTORNEYS-AT-LAW
ROANOKE, VIROINtA
14015-1699
Notice is hereby given to all interested persons
that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia,
will hold a public hearing at 7:00 p.m., at the Roanoke
County Administrative Center, at 3738 Brambleton Avenue,
Roanoke, Virginia, on December 15, 1987, on the petition of
JOHN NEWCOMB to rezone with certain conditions A 1.714 acre
parcel of land, generally located at the northeast corner of
Glen Heather Drive and Route 419, within the Windsor Hills
Magisterial District, and recorded as Parcel #76.07-02-52,
in the Roanoke County Tax Records, pursuant to the
provisions of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance, said
parcel of land. being more particularly described as-follows:
A 1.714 acre parcel of land, generally
located at the northeast corner of Glen
Heather Drive and Route 419, within the
Windsor Hills Magisterial District, and
recorded as Parcel #76.07-02-52,~in the
Roanoke County Tax Records
A copy of the Zoning Ordinance of Roanoke County
and amendments thereto as well as a copy of the petition,
.site plan, and other documents related to this request may
be examined in the office of the Department of Development,
located in Room 600 at Roanoke County Administrative Center,
3738 Brambleton Avenue, Roanoke, Virginia..
Roanoke County will provide assistance to
handicapped persons desiring to attend public hearings.
Such individuals are requested to contact the County office
of Personnel Services (703) 772-2018) if special provisions
are necessary for attendance.
Given under my hand this o~~ day of /YDY~~
OSTERHGUDT, FERGUSON
NATT, AHERON & AGEE
ATTORNEYS-AT-IAW
RGANOKE, VIRGINIA
14018-1699
198
`~1~~,~.
Mct r y f-,F . i4 ~/ e~ C l e r k
Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County
-----------------------------------------------------------
Please publish in the evening edition ~of The Roanoke Times-
World News on Tuesday, December 1, 1987, and '~uesday,
December 8, 1987. Please bill cost of the publication to
Osterhoudt, Ferguson, Natt, Aheron 8 Agee,, P.C., 1919
Electric Road,. S.W., Roanoke, Virginia 24018.
2
PUBLIC NOTICE
Please be advised that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County at its meeting on the 15th day of December, 1987, at the
Roanoke County Administration Center in Roanoke, Virginia, at
7:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, will
hold a public hearing on the following matter, to-wit:
Establishment of Six Year Construction Plan for the
secondary system of the State Highways for Fiscal Year
1988-1994.
All members of the public interested in the matter set forth
above may appear and be heard at the time and place aforesaid.
A copy of the proposed schedule referred to above is on file
at the Residency Office, State Highway Department, 714 South
Broad Street, Salem, Virginia, and the County Administrator's
Office, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, Roanoke, Virginia, where it is
available for public inspection during regular business hours.
~'Z~~ ~/.
Mary Allen, Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
Publish on the following dates:
December 1, 1987 and December 8, 1987
Morning and Evening Editions
Bill Cost of Publication To:
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
P. 0. Box 29800
Roanoke, Virginia 24018-0798
LEGAL NOTICE OF A _ RJR iMEETINC . ~' THE RQANO~tE. COO1~T1'Y.. BOPiRD ORS': , S0PF1tVIS0RS
Notice is hereby given to all interested persons that the Roanoke County Board of
Supervisors will hold a public hearing at 7:00 P.M, on Tuesday, December 15, 1987, at
the Roanoke County Administration Center, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, SW, in Roanoke,
Virginia to hear the following request:
1. .Petition of.Plantation Enterprises for a Special Exception Permit to operate a
golf course on a 34.77 acre tract located at 5621 Plantation Road in the
Hollins Magisterial District.
All. plans and ordinances are available for inspection in the Department of
Planning and Zoning, Room 600, 3738 Brambleton Avenue,' Roanoke,- Virginia. Roanoke
County.~will provide assis~ance_to handicapped personsdesiring to attend public
hearings. ' Such individuals are requested to contact the County office of Personnel
Services 703/772-2018 if special provisions are needed for attendance.
' Given under my hand this 23rd day of November, 1987.
-Mary Allen, Deputy Clerk
u Roanoke County Board of Supervisors..~~;~ ..
,;~;~~ ,~ a . ;~~ ~ - ~,
Please publish: Evening Edition
Roarloloe Times & Worlc~News
,. ~ Decsnb~r 1, 1987
~ ~ ~~ t~. a~~~ z ;~~ ~ ~~ ~k December 8, 1987
~~ ~ .~~_
Please bill: County of Roanoke
. ~ • s« Department of Planning. & Zoning
'' ~` ~.. P.O. BoQC 29800
. ~X~ Roanoke, VA 24018-0798
s
b
~ FtOANO~
F
~.
a
1838
(~n~tnt~ of ~uttnn~~e
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT
December 4, 1987
Mrs. Martha Plank
Roanoke Times and ~~lorld-PJews
201-209 Campbell Avenue S4J
Roanoke, VA
Dear P~1artha:
PLANNING COMMISSION
BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
Please cancel the advertisement for the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
Public Hearing on Brambleton Medical Associates scheduled for December 15, 1987.
The ad is scheduled to appear in the evening edition on December 8, 197. I
would also appreciate your billing the Roanoke County Planning Department~~nstead
of John Molumphy.
In addition I would like to change the location description in the legal ad of
the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors for Jones and Jones Architects Associates.
Instead of "immediately west of its intersection with Dwight Street" I would
like to insert "immediately east of its intersection with Jones Street." I
would appreciate your billing this change to the Roanoke County Planning
Department as well.
Thank you once again for your invaluable assistance.
S~i--n~e re l .
Liz Parcell
Community Specialist
cc: Mary Allen, Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
G
L E G A L N O T I C E
Notice is hereby given to all interested persons that the
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at 7:00
p.m. on Tuesday, December 15, 1987, in the Community Room at the Roanoke
County Administration Center, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, S.W., Roanoke,
Virginia, on the petition of Brambleton Medical Associates, requesting
rezoning from R-1 Residential to B-1 Business of a tract containing 1.48
acres and located immediately south of 3142 Brambleton Avenue in the
Cave Spring Magisterial District.
Rezoning has been requested to construct a parking area. The
County Planning Commission will review this petition on December 1,
1987.
A copy of the Zoning Ordinance of Roanoke County and amendments
thereto as well as a copy of the petition, site plan, and other
documents related to this request may be examined in the office of the
Department of Development, located in Room 600 at the Roanoke County
Administration Center.
Roanoke County will provide assistance to handicapped persons
desiring to attend public hearings. Such individuals are requested to
contact the County office of Personnel Services ([7031 772-2018) if
special provisions are necessary for attendance.
Given under my hand this 25th day of November, 1987.
y'Ytcu-~-~. ,~ -
Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
Please publish in the evening edition
of the Roanoke Times and World News on:
Tuesday, December 1, 1987
Tuesday, December 8, 1987
Direct the bill for Publication to:
John T. Molumphy
308 Second Street
Roanoke, Virginia 24002
.,
ITEM NUMBER ~~ °•
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE
IN ROANOKE, VA., ON
MEETING DATE: December 15, 1987
OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
TUESDAY,
SUBJECT: Ordinance pursuant to Sections 24.1-37 and 24.1-233.1
of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, authorizing
the relocation and establishment of the central absen-
tee voter election district in the Roanoke County Admin-
istration Center for all elections held within Roanoke
County
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
':['he Board of Supervisors had designated the old Roanoke
County Courthouse as the central absentee voter election dis-
trict. As a result of the sale of the Courthouse and relocation.
of the Registrar's Office, the central absentee voter election
district needs to be relocated. Tn a letter dated December 1.,
1987, from Leonard M. Pick, Secretary of the Electoral Board of
Roanoke County, to Bob Johnson, the local electoral board recom-
mended moving the central absentee voter election district to the
Roanoke County Administration Center for all elections held with-
in Roanoke County.
Section 24.1-37 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended,
provides for the establishment and alteration of County election
districts or precincts. More specifically, Section 24.1-233..1
allows the governing body of each county to establish a central_
absentee voter election district in the courthouse or other pub-
lic building upon passage of an ordinance.
The Code also provides that no change as aforementioned
shall be made within sixty (60) days next preceding any genera]_
election. A presidential primary general election will be held
on March 8, 1988. The second .reading schedu]_ed for January 12,
1988, would fall within sixty (60) days of the presidential pr_i_ma-
ry. Therefore, pursuant to Section 18.04 of the Charter of Roa-
noke County, it is recommended that the second reading be waived
and the ordinance adopted as an emergency measure.
~ FISCAL IMPACT:
This change of location of the central absentee voter elec-
tion district requires no additional funding. The cost asso-
ciated with the relocation of any other County offices will be
S "" "' ,(
covered by a separate appropriation at a later date.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff makes the following recommendations:
1. That the Board of Supervisors adopt the proposed ordin-
ance as an emergency measure.
2. That the County Administrator execute such documents and
take such action on beha]_f of Roanoke County as are necessary to
accomplish this relocation; all of which shall be upon form ap-
proved by the County Attorney.
Respectfully submitted,
_~
Paul M. Mahoney
County Attorney
~,
------------------------------------------------------------------
ACTION VOTE
Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs
Denied ( ) Brittle
Received ( ) Garrett
Referred Johnson
To McGraw
Nickens
. .~ ~-rF
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER, ON TUESDAY, DECEMBER 15, 1987
ORDINANCE PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 24.1-37
AND 24.2-233.1 OF THE 1950 CODE OF
VIRGINIA, AS AMENDED, AUTHORIZING THE
RELOCATION AND ESTABLISHMENT OF A CEN-
TRAL ABSENTEE VO'T'ER ELECTION DISTRICT
IN THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER FOR ALL ELECTIONS HELD WITHIN
ROANOKE COUNTY
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia, had designated, upon the recommendation of the Elec-
toral Board of Roanoke County, the old Roanoke County Courthouse
in the City of Salem, Virginia, as the central absentee voter
election district; and
WHEREAS, as a result of the sale of the courthouse and
the relocation of the office of the Registrar of Roanoke County
to the Roanoke County Administration Center, the Electoral Board
of Roanoke County recommended to the Board of Supervisors of Roa-
noke County the relocation and establishment of the central absen-
tee voter election district in the Roanoke County Administration
Center for all elections held within Roanoke County.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervi-
sors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That the first reading on this ordinance was held
on December 15, 1987; and the second reading was waived pursuant
to the emergency measure clause of Section 18.04 of the Roanoke
County Charter.
~~ -~_~
2. That the relocation and establishment of the cen-
tral absentee voter election district in the Roanoke County Admin-
istration Center for all elections held within Roanoke County is
hereby authorized and approved.
3. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized
to take such actions and to execute such documents as may be nec-
essary to accomplish these purposes, all upon form approved by
the County Attorney.
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER, ON TUESDAY, DECEMBER 15, 1987
ORDINANCE 121587-10 PURSUANT TO
SECTIONS 24.1-37 AND 24.2-233.1 OF THE
1950 CODE OF VIRGINIA, AS AMENDED,
AUTHORIZING THE RELOCATION AND
ESTABLISHMENT OF A CENTRAL ABSENTEE
VOTER ELECTION DISTRICT IN THE ROANOKE
COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER FOR ALL
ELECTIONS HELD WITHIN ROANOKE COUNTY
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia, had designated, upon the recommendation of the Elec-
toral Board of Roanoke County, the old Roanoke County Courthouse
in the City of Salem, Virginia, as the central absentee voter
election district; and
WHEREAS, as a result of the sale of the courthouse and
the relocation of the office of the Registrar of Roanoke County
to the Roanoke County Administration Center, the Electoral Board
of Roanoke County recommended to the Board of Supervisors of Roa-
noke County the relocation and establishment of the central absen-
tee voter election district in the Roanoke County Administration
Center for all elections held within Roanoke County.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervi-
sors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That the f first reading on this ordinance was held
on December 15, 1987; and the second reading was waived pursuant
to the emergency measure clause of Section 18.04 of the Roanoke
County Charter.
2. That the relocation and establishment of the cen-
tral absentee voter election district in the Roanoke County Admin-
istration Center for all elections held within Roanoke County is
hereby authorized and approved.
3. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized
to take such actions and to execute such documents as may be nec-
essary to accomplish these purposes, all upon form approved by
the County Attorney.
On motion of Supervisor Brittle, seconded by Supervisor
Johnson, and upon the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson
NAYS: None
A COPY - TESTE:
J9~ .
Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
12/18/87
cc: File
Paul Mahoney, County Administrator
Elizabeth Leah, County Registrar
Members of the Electoral Board
ITEM NUMBER
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
IN ROANOKE, VA., ON TUESDAY,
MEETING DATE: December 15, 1987
SUBJECT: ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION OF CERTAIN REAL
ESTATE LOCATED WITHIN THE CITY OF ROANOKE ADJACENT Z'0
THE ROANOKE REGIONAL AIRPORT, AND THE CONVEYANCE OF
SAID REAL ESTATE IN EXCHANGE FOR CERTAIN REAL ESTATE
FOR AN ACCESS ROAD, AND THE APPROVAL OF A CERTAIN AGREE-
MENT WITH THE ROANOKE REGIONAL AIRPORT COMMISSION
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
On December 1, 1987, the Board of Supervisors approved a
request for industrial access road funding for the Valleypointe,
Phase I project, and authorized the execution of the project docu-
ment between Lingerfelt Development Corporation and Roanoke
County. On October 27, 1987, the Board approved the rezoning of
the Harris-Moomaw properties.
This ordinance complies with the provisions of the County
Charter which require that any acquisition or conveyance of real
estate by the County be accomplished by ordinance. The first
reading of this proposed ordinance is scheduled for December 15,
1987; the second reading is scheduled for January 12, 1988.
This ordinance authorizes the following actions:
1) The acquisition of approximately eight (8) acres of real.
estate located in Roanoke City from the Ida Mae Holland estate;
2) The acquisition of approximately eight (8) acres of real
estate located in Roanoke County from the Roanoke Regional Air-
port Commission;
3) The exchange of the Holland estate property for the Air-
port Commission property;
4) The disposition of these properties for valid pub]_ic
purposes, namely the purposes of the Roanoke Regional Airport
Commission and for public road purposes;
1
~"
5) The ratification and confirmation of the agreement be-
tween Roanoke County and the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission;
and
6) The appropriation of funds to accomplish these purposes.
FISCAL IMPACT:
$260,000 needs to be appropriated from Fund Balance. This
is a portion of the $2,000,000 proposal which was presented to
the Board on December 1, 1987. ($255,000 purchase price plus
$5,000 for miscellaneous legal, survey, title insurance costs.)
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff makes the following recommendations:
1. That the Board of Supervisors adopt the proposed
ordinance.
2. That the Board of Supervisors reaffirm that these par-
cels of real estate are surplus and are available for disposition
by the County, and shall be made available for other public uses;
namely, for the purposes of the Roanoke Regional Airport Commis-
sion and for public road purposes.
Respectfully submitted,
/.,mot ~ ~~~~'.l~
Brent Sheffler
Economic Development Specialist
------------------------------------
ACTION
Approved ( )
Denied ( )
Received ( )
Referred
To
Motion by:
~~~. ~ ' ~,
Paul M. Mahoney
County Attorney
----------------------------
VOTE
No Yes Abs
Brittle
Garrett
Johnson
McGraw
Nickens
2
. ~ - ..~.
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF 'T'HE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINIS'T'RATION
CENTER, ON TUESDAY, DECEMBER 15, 1987
ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION
OF CERTAIN REAL ESTATE LOCATED WITHIN
THE CITY OF ROANOKE ADJACENT' TO THE
ROANOKE REGIONAL AIRPORT, AND THE CON-
VEYANCE OF SAID REAL ESTATE IN EXCHANGE
FOR CERTAIN REAL ESTATE FOR AN ACCESS
ROAD, AND THE APPROVAL OF A CERTAIN
AGREEMENT WITH THE ROANOKE REGIONAL
AIRPORT COMMISSION
WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors finds
that the acquisition of certain real estate adjacent to Thirlane
Road and the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission property in
Roanoke City from the Ida Mae Holland estate serves an important
public purpose by promoting and benefiting the regional public
purposes of the Airport Commission; and
WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors finds
that the acquisition of certain real estate in the vicinity of
the southeast intersection of Interstate Routes 81 and 581 in
Roanoke County, Virginia, from the Roanoke Regional Airport Com-
mission serves an important public purpose by promoting indus-
trial and economic development and by inducing manufactur_i.ng,
industrial, governmental, or commercial enterprises to locate or
remain in Roanoke County and the Roanoke Valley; and
WHEREAS, said acquisition of this real estate shall be
used for industrial access or other road improvements to facili-
tate the industrial and economic development of previously unde-
veloped lands within the County; and
1
. "~ ....
WHEREAS, the acquisition of this property will improve
the safety of the intersections of State Route 117 (Peters Creek
Road), Thirlane Road, and the interchange of Interstate 581; and
WHEREAS, this transaction will be in harmony with and
further the fulfillment of the duly-adopted comprehensive plan of
the County; will produce increased revenue from property, sales,
license, and other taxes or fees to the County; will produce ex-
panded employment opportunities for the citizens of the County
and surrounding jurisdictions; and
WHEREAS, this transaction will aid and promote the
goals and purposes of the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission by
conveying to the Commission certain real estate located within
the City of Roanoke adjacent to existing facilities and property.
WHEREAS, these properties are deemed "surplus" for the
purposes of Section 16.01 of the Roanoke County Charter, and are
being made available for other public uses.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the Board of Supervi-
sors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That the first reading on this ordinance was held
on December 15, 1987, and the second reading was held on
January 12, 1988.
2. That the acquisition of certain real estate not to
exceed eight (8) acres located within the City of Roanoke known
as the Ida Mae Holland tract is hereby authorized and approved.
3. That the acquisition of certain real estate not to
exceed eight (8) acres from the Roanoke Regional Airport Commis-
sion is hereby authorized and approved. This real estate shall
2
'"~ "'
be utilized for industrial access or other road improvement pur-
poses. A subsequent conveyance of this property or any portion
thereof to the Virginia Department of Transportation for public
road purposes and uses is hereby authorized and approved.
4. That the conveyance of the real estate identified
in paragraph 2, above, to the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission
in exchange for the real estate identified in paragraph 3, above,
is hereby authorized and approved. Further, the disposition and
conveyance of the property described in paragraph 2, above, is
for other public uses and purposes, namely, the uses and purposes
of the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission.
5. That the agreement between the Roanoke Regional
Airport Commission and Roanoke County set forth in the actions
and documents of the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission at its
September 25, 1987, meeting is hereby ratified, confirmed, and
approved.
6. That the sum of $260,000 is hereby appropriated
from the Fund Balance to accomplish the purposes of this ordin-
ance.
7. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized
to take such actions and to execute such documents as may be ne-
cessary to accomplish these purposes, all upon form approved by
the County Attorney.
3
ITEM NUMBER ~ "'~
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINIS7'RA'1'ION CENTER
IN ROANOKE, VA., ON TUESDAY,
MEETING DATE: December 15, 1987
SUBJECT: Ordinance amending Chapter 7, "Building Regulations" of
the Roanoke County Code by repealing Article III, Sec-
tion 7-31, "General Contractors' Bond," Section 7-32,
"Plumbing Contractors' Bond," and Section 7-33,
"Electrical Contractors' Bond"
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
State law requires that all contractors who perform work in
the State of Virginia for more than $1,500 be registered with the
Virginia State Department of Commerce. Each contractor applies
to the State Department of Commerce to be either "Class A" or
"Class B" registered.
Class A Contractor Class B Contractor
Performs work over $40,000 Performs work less than
and exempt from local $40,000 and more than
contractors' bonds by State law. $1,500. Subject to local
bonding requirements.
Currently, all Class B contr actors who perform work in
Roanoke County are required to have a $5,000 bond.
After researching our own Class B contractor bonding require-
ments and those same requirements in other localities, it was
determined that our requirements are not needed. The reasons for
this conclusion are as follows:
l.. The State Department of Com merce has created the Virgin-
ia Contractors' Transaction Recovery Fund System that protects
and can reimburse citizens from improper or illegal work
contractors perform.
2. Since established in June of 1975, Roanoke County has
acted only once to collect on a Class B contractors' bond. This
proved to be very costly.
3. Twenty-six other localities were researched. It was
found that eleven localities do not require Class B contractors'
1
/~' r~
bonds. Some localities actually eliminated these bond require-
ments when the Virginia Contractors' Transaction Recovery Fund
System was established. Fifteen localities still require bonds;
however, of the fifteen, only two have ever acted to collect on a
Class B contractors' bond.
4. The high cost of staff time is prohibitive to Roanoke
County to administer Class B contractors' bond requirements.
Many work hours are spent yearly due to filing and checking
active contractors' bonds.
FISCAL IMPACT :,,C~~
None . 11~
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors adopt these
ordinance amendments.
Respectfully submitted,
`rY\ ~~Y~v~-
Paul M. Mahoney
County Attorney
Approved ( )
llenied ( )
Received ( )
Referred
To
Motion by:
ACTION
Brittle
Garrett
Johnson
McGraw
Nickens
VOTE
No Yes Abs
-~
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER, ON TUESDAY, DECEMBER 15, 1987
ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 7, "BUILDING
REGULATIONS" OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE
BY REPEALING ARTICLE III, SECTION 7-31,
"GENERAL CONTRACTORS' BOND," SECTION
7-32, "PLUMBING CONTRACTORS' BOND," AND
SECTION 7-33, "ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS'
BOND
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Super~~isors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That the first reading of this ordinance was held
on December 15, 1987; the second reading was held on January 12,
1988; and
2. That Chapter 7, "Building Regulations" of the Roa-
noke County Code is hereby amended by the repeal of the following
sections:
ARTICLE III. CONTRACTORS AND TRADESMAN
DIVISION 1. GENERALLY
See.- ~-3~- 6ese~al ees~~ae~e~sl l~ead-
Fad S~e~~ pe~sea eagae~ee~ ~s ~l~e bt~s~r~ess of eeas~~tte~-
~s~ bt~~~d}sgs ~s the eetts~~* sl~a~~ e~~e a e~eee~ aae~ sty€€~e~er~~
aaat~a~ bet~e~; ~s ~i~e axtetts~ of lea ~ket~saae~ e~e~~a~s f~~9; 689 W~~h
a~~~e~eel ee~~e~a~e s~t~e~~- the l~esd sl~a~~ ~e~a~s ~s €t~11 ~e~ee
ase~ e~~eP~ t~s~~~ 3tt~p 3~ ~e~}ew~sg ~i~e ~ea~ ~s wl~~eh st~eh 1~eael ~s
w~~~~ea-
fb~ the beset ~egt~~~ee~ b~ ~l~~s see~~es sha~~ be se ees-
d~b~ened blab a~~ eess~~se~~es we~le }~e~fe~xtee~ b~ e~ t~aeie~ Abe
st~~e~~~s~es e~ ~l~e eea~~aebe~ sba~1 be ~s aeee~dasee w~~h ~l~e
1
~~e~}s}eas e€ €~€s e3~ap€e~ aae~ ~e €se~ex~a€€~ blue bea~e7 e€ sttge~~a€-
sees e~ €l~e ewae~ e€ Abe g~e~e~~p ae-a€as€ e~a~-a~es by ~easea e€
ar~p eke€ees a~}s€s~ ett€ e€ st~eb eels€~txe~€ea aael sba~~ be €tt~€~re~
eese~}€€eaee~ ~e ~e€tta~ €e €be bea~e~ e€ sttpe~~€se~s e~ bbe g~e~e~€~
ewae~ asp t~esep e~~ene~ee~ €e ee~~ee€ asp we~# e~ ~epa€~ asp e~ax~ae~e
e~eae e~ eac~se~ lip €be eeab~ae€s~ €a €be e~ee~x€ees e€ b€s we~3~-
Se~el~ bend sba€~ be €tt~€ke~ eeRe~}€€epee~ ~e same ba~x~}ess aap ~e~-
sea €e~ w~iex~ bye eea€~ae€ees e~ ~€s e~:p~epees zap eke eeas~~tte€€ea
e~ €t~~a€sl~ x~a€e~€a}s aae~ €i~a€ be w€~~ dap a}~ €ees aae~ a}} €€ees
aee~ Mesa€€€es }~~e~e~}p €~~esee} c~~ea b€xi €e~ ~€eea€€ea e€ asp ~~e-
~€s}ea e€ €b€s ebary€e~- ~€ €be ees~~ae€e~ €a€}s; ~e€t~ses e~ se-
e~~ee~s €e ~a3~e sttel~ we~3~ eet~€e~~ ~e €~€s el~a~€e~; as ~€~ee€ees by
€~ie btt€~~€ae~ a€€€e}a~ }s a w~€€€es e~e7e~; bbe eet~a~p a€€e~eep
sba~~ ae€€€p €l~e sn~e€p es €~e beau; €a w~€~€ng; aae~ €€ €l~e st~~e-
€p €a€}s €e x~al~e st~eb ee~~ee€}ea w€€b}s a€~b€ f&} e~aps a€€e~ sttel~
ae€€ee €s xqa€}eel ~e €#~e }as€ 3~aews ae~e~~ess e€ ~~te stt~e€p; €l~e
a~et~a€ e€ €l~e beset sl~a~€ be €e~€e€€ed €e bbe bea~e~ e€ st~~e~~}-
sees-
{e} Abe beae7 ~eej~t}~ee~ by €~€s see€€es si~a~} be ap-
ry~e~ee~ by €be eetta€p ae~x3€a}s€~a€ees ase~ ~eges€€e~ w€€b ~l~e eetta€p
e~e~~ asd sba~~ be ~eaeweel asatta~~p ea e~ be€e~e 3t~~p 3~-
See- ~-38- ~~tts-b€ae~ eea€~aebe~s1 bea~~-
fa} Be€e~e aap rye~sea sba}~ eagae~e €a blue btts€aess e€
a g~ttx~b€ag eea€~ae€e~ €s €i~e eer~s€~a; be sl~a~~ e~eges€€ w€€b €k~e
eet~s€p a}e~3~ a ~ee~ at~e~ sty€€€e€eab beau; ~a blue s~t~ e€ €er~ bi~et~-
sase~ de~~aes f$~8;888}; a~g~e~aee~ by blue eeetabp ae~F~€s€s€~a~e~ asd
2
~" ,~
eeae~€~€eaee~ €~ta~ st~e~ ~e~sea w}~~ €a€€~€tt~~p ebse~~e a~~ €~e Navas
ge~~a€a€a~ ~e ~~t~xtb€a~- e~~a€s dap€ag; bias€€ae~ ase~ e~ea~a~€ag;
€l~a€ €~e bea~e~ e€ st~pe~~€se~s s~a~~ be }ae~ex3s~€€ed asd sawed ~a~xt-
less €~e~t a~~ eta€~ns a~€s€ae €~ex~ aee€des€s aad dax~a~e e€ aap
el~a~ae€e~ wi~a~see~e~ eat~sed lip ~l~e se~~€e~er~ee e€ st~e~ }~e~sea e~
b*~ aap a€~e~ tea€a~€~€t~~ e~ €aadee~t~a€e vae~# dese by ~€~ e~ l~~s
ae~es€s e~ e~g~epees; at~d €~a€ sttel~ pe~sea w€~~ ~a€a€a€a €s a sa€e
eead€€€ea; €e~ a ~e~€ed e€ eae peas; a~~ ~€€ees aad e~ea~aa~€eas
vvl~~e~ trap be egeaed €n asp s€eee€ ~s ~l~e peg€e~x~asee e€ ar~p ~~t~xvb-
€ae vae~~ aad €tt~€l~e~ €l~a€ a~~ ~€~€ aad e€l~e~ eta€ees€a~ e~ea~a€ed
va~~~ lie ~e~~aeed ~n a geed eead€€~ea vas€~ s€~€}a~ xta€e~€a~s-
W~e~e st~ek exea~a€€er~ €s xtade €s as t~s~a~ed s~~ee€ e~ aap s€eee€
pawed va€€~ e~e~€ e~ x~aeada~; €l~e vae~d ~s€eee€;u as l~e~e~a used;
s~a~~ app~p €e s~devaa~l~s; et~~l~s; ~s€€ees; aad s€eee€ paw}a~-
fly} ~l~e bead ~e~t~~~ed by €~€s seed€ea sl~a~~ be x~a€a-
€a~sed €s €tt~~ €eee aad a€€ee€ a€ a~} ~~rnes:
bee- ~-33- ~~ee€~€ea~ eee€~ae€e~sl besd-
fa} As treed €a €l~~s see€€es; €i~e €e~~t ~e~ee€~€ea~ eea-
€~ae€e~u s~a~~ x~eas aap pe~sea vale €s esga~ed €a €l~e l~ns~aess a€;
e~ vale eep~esea€s ~€xtse~€ €e €~e pttb~€e as He€a~ engaged €a ~i~e
bc~s€aess a€; ~ss~a~~~ag; epee€€sg e~ ~epa€~€ag e~ee~~€ea~ va~~€ag;
€€~€tt~es; apps€anees; appa~a€t~s e~ dew€ees vat€eY~ aye €e be used
€e~ €~e €~aasxt€ss~es e€ epee€~€e ett~~es€ €e~ ~~gk€; i~ea€; pevae~
e~ a€ke~ epee€~€ea~ pt}~peses va€€~€a €~e eetta€p; e~ value ees€~ae€s
w€~~ a€l~e~s €e de st2el~ vae~3~-
3
!'-' +~
fb} ~~e~p e~ee~~~ea} ees~~ae~e~ sba}} e~}ee a geed aad
sty€€€e€ea€ aaat~a~ bead }s Abe st~~+ e€ €ea ~beesaad de}~a~s
~$~6,999}; ~~~b agg~e~ed ee~ge~a~e st~~e~p; sx~el~ bead €e ~e~a€s ~a
€tt~} €e~ee aad a€€ees tts~€~ Beeet~tbe~ 3~ €e}}ew€s~ €be peas €a
~al~~e~ }~ ~s ~a~€~€ea- 6t~eb bead sba}} be se eead€~€eaed ~ba~ a}}
epee€~€ea} we~# gee€e~xied by e~ t~ade~ Abe st~ge~~€s€es e€ st~eb
eea€~ae€e~ sl~a}} be }a aeee~daaee w}fib g~e~~s~ess e€ ~b}s ei~ag~e~
aad €e €adext~t~€~ €l~e bead e€ st~ge~~€se~s e~ Abe evaae~ e€ g~ege~-
~~* aga~as€ da~a~e by ~easea e€ asp de€ees ~a va~~}sg e~ €l~e egea-
€ae} e€ s€~ee€s- 6t~el~ bead sl~a}~ be €tt~~l~e~ eead€~€eaed ~e ~e€txad
~e Abe bead e€ sc~ge~~~se~s e~ Abe g~ege~~p ewr~e~ atop x~esep e~-
}~eaded €e ee~~ee~ aap vae~l~ e~ ~e}~a~~ ar~p daxtae~e deae e~ eat~sed by
€be ees~~ae~e~ ~a €l~e e~eett€~ea e€ b€s vae~3~ aad ~e same l~a~x~~ess
aap ge~sea €e~ wi~eat ~l~e eea€~ae€e~ e~ ~~s e~tg~epees ~+Rp de a}ee-
~~€ea} tae~~ e~ €tt~a~sb xta~e~}a}s aad ~ba~ lie va}}} gap a}} €ees
aad a}} €€ses aad geaa}€€es g~ege~}~ ~x~gesed ages }~€t~t €ees ~€e~a-
~~ea e€ aap g~e~~s~es e€ ~b~s el~ag~e~-
fe} ~€ a beaded epee€~€ea~ eea~~ae~e~ €a€}s; ~e€ttses
e~ r~ee~~ee~s ~e x~a~e bps we~# ees€e~x; ~e ~b~s ebag~e~; as d~~ee~ed
by ~l~e gt~~}d€a~ a€€€e~a~ ~a a w~€~~ea e~de~; Abe eetts~p a~~e~aep
sba}} se~~€~ Abe stt~e~*~ eta Abe bead; ~s ~~}~}s~; aad ~€ Abe stt~e-
~~ €a~}s ~e x~a)~e sttel~ ee~~ee~€ea w€~b€a a€e~b~ fg} daps a€~e~ st~ek
se€~ee ~s tna€~ed ~e ~l~e }as€ ~sevaa address e€ Abe st~~e€p; €be
a~etta€ e€ €l~e bead sba} be €e~€e~€ed €e €l~e beard e€ st~ge~~~-
se~s-
fd} Abe bead ~egtt€~ed by €b€s see€~ea sl~a~} be ag-
g~e*~ed by ~l~e eet~a~p adxt€a~s€~a~e~ aad deges~~ed w~~b Abe eetta~p
4
~-3
e~e~# aae~ ~eeewed aaet~a~~~ ee e~ be~e~e Beeeatl~e~ 3~-
2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect on
January 12, 1988.
5
Also Included:
Photos,
Comprehensive
Annual Financial
Report for County of
Roanoke Year Ended
June 30, 1987,
and
Map of the County