Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout3/10/1987 - RegularO~ ~OANO~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~t~~~~ Z ~ ,~ 2 C~~~~~ ~ a~ J 1g38 ROANORE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ACTION AGENDA MARCH 10, 1987 Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meeting. Remulaand meetings are held on the second Tuesday of the month at 2:00 p. the fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public Hearings will be heard at 7:00 p.m on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. A. OPENING CEREMONIES (2.:00 P.M.) 1. Roll Call. 2. Invocation AssistantbCounty Administrator 3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag. B. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS ANNOUNCED THAT BRENT SHEFFLER HAD COMPLETED A DALE CARNEGIE COURSE RECENTLY. C. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS. BLJ REQUESTED A WORK SESSION ON THE NEW ZONING ORDINANCE TODAY AS ITEM 0-4. _ _ ECH REQUESFOR WATER FACILITIESNBE MOVEDEPRIOR TO HOISTRUCTION STANDARDS D, PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS AND AWARDS _ 1. Resolution of Appreciation to Dr. Nancy M. Welch, Director of the Alleghany Health District. BLJ/AHB - URC E. NEW BUSINESS F. REQUEST FOR WORK SESSIONS G, REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS WORK SESSIONRESENTEDGBYACLIFFORDRCRAIGN STANDARDS FOR WATER FACILITIES P H, FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 1, Ordinance repealing Section 20.1-11 (a), (b) and (c) of Chapter 20, "Water," of the 1971 Roanoke County Code, which is Chapter 22, "Water," of the 1985 Roanoke County Code. AHB/BLJ AFTER ORDINANCE IS AMENDED - URC 2ND READING - 3/24/87 2, Ordinance authorizing the conveyance of approximately 32 acres of real estate from the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County to the County School Board of Roanoke County, Virginia. AHB/SAM - URC 2ND READING - 3/24/87 3, Ordinance authorizing the conveyance of 0.093 acrerlthttof waygon1RoDtea601e(OldfHollinsoRoad)on for g BLJ/AHB - URC 2nd READING - 3/24/87 4, Ordinance amending Section 21-52 (e) of the Roanoke County Code pertaining to Use Value Assessment Revalidation Fees. AHB/LG - URC 2ND READING - 3/24/87 5, Ordinance amending Chapter 7, "Building Regulations" of the Roanoke County Code providing for Appeals to be heard by the Building Code Board of Adjustments and Appeals, requiring owners of unsafe buildings to clear the lot after demolition and extending the duration of demolition permits from thirty to ninety days. LG/SAM - URC 2ND READING - 3/24/87 I. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 2 1. Ordinance accepting an offer for and authorizing the conveyance of an easement to Appalachian Power Company. HCN/SAM - URC ,7. APPOINTMENTS 1. Court Service Unit Advisory Council/Youth and Family Service Advisory Board. AHB NOMIJOEECRONNETORREPLACELTHESREOVUTFLEETBPOWELOLM ANDE SPRING, REAPPOINTMENT OF TED POWELL. K, REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS AHB ANNOUNCED THAT SATURDAY, APRIL 11, 1987 BETWEEN 9:00 A.M. AND 11:00 A.M. IS CLEAN VALLEY DAY. BLJ REQUESTED INFORMATION ON AN 8 ACRE SITE CONTIGUOUS TO THE AMP PROPERTY ON OLD HOLLINS ROAD. DURING THE REZONING PROCESS, THERE WERE CERTAIN LIKEEMORESINFORMATIONDONGTHIS.DEVELOPMENT OF A PARK AND HE WOULD L. CONSENT AGENDA ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY. LG/BLJ - URC 1, Minutes of Meeting - February 10, 1987, February 18, 1987, February 24, 1987. 2. Confirmation of Committee Appointments to the League of Older Americans Advisory Board and the Transportation and Safety Commission. 3, Abandonment of Portions of the Old Chaparral Drive (Route 800 ) in Roanoke County. 4. Request for approval of a Raffle Permit for the Botetourt Jaycees. M. CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS N. REPORTS 3 1. Contingency Fund Balance 2. Statement of Expenditures for the Month ended January 31, 1987. 3. General Operating Fund Income Analysis. 4. Youth Haven II Status Report 5. Economic Development Update 6. Accounts Paid - February 1987 RECEIVED AND FILED p. WORK SESSIONS 1. Design and Construction Standards for Water Facilities. 2. Status Report on the Reservoir Project. PRESENTED BY JOHN HUBBARD 3, Discussion of the proposed tax rate for 1987 and the budget process. ESTABLISHED DATES FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS AND BUDGET WORK SESSIONS 3/24/87 - 7:00 p.m. PUBLIC HEARING FOR CITIZEN COMMENT 3/30/87 - 3:00 p.m. BUDGET WORK SESSION 4/7/87 - 4:00 p.m. BUDGET WORK SESSION 4/7/87 - 7:00 P•m• PROPERTYETAXNANDOMACHINERYTAND,TOOLSOTAX RATES. 4/14/87 - 2:00 p.m. SET TAX RATES FOR ABOVE ADOPT 1987/88 BUDGET 4/28/87 - 3:00 p.m. ADOPT BUDGET APPROPRIATION RESOLUTION HCN MOTION NOT TO RAISE REAL ESTATE RATES - AHB SECOND - UW AHB MOTION NOT TO RAISE PERSONAL PROPERTY AND MACHINE AND TOOL TAX RATE - HCN SECOND - UW p. EXECUTIVE SESSION pursuant to the Code of Virginia 2.1-344 (a) (2) TO DISCUSS THREE REAL ESTATE MATTERS. BLJ/AHB - URC BLJ MOTION TO RETURN TO OPEN SESSION-AHB SECOND - URC Q ADJOURNMENT AT 5:17 P.M. 4 O~ ~OAWp~~ /`' z °~ - ~ ~ ~~~~~~~e - ~~~ ~~ 2 ~i' o a~ J 1838 ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA MARCH 10, 1987 Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meeting. Regular meetings are held on the second Tuesday of the month at 2:00 p.m., and the fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public Hearings will be heard at 7:00 p.m on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. A. OPENING CEREMONIES (2:00 P.M.) 1. Roll Call. 2. Invocation: John Chambliss Assistant County Administrator 3, Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag. B. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS C. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS. D. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS AND AWARDS 1. Resolution of Appreciation to Dr. Nancy M. Welch, Director of the Alleghany Health District. E. NEW BUSINESS F. REQUEST FOR WORK SESSIONS G. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS H. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance repealing Section 20.1-11 (a~), (b) and (c) of Chapter 20, "Water," of the 1971 Roanoke County Code, which is Chapter 22, "Water," of the 1985 Roanoke County Code. 2. Ordinance authorizing the conveyance of approximately 32 acres of real estate from the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County to the County School Board of Roanoke County, Virginia. 3. Ordinance authorizing the conveyance of 0.093 acres to the Virginia Department of Transportation for right of way on Route 601 (Old Hollins Road). 4. Ordinance amending Section 21-52 (e) of the Roanoke County Code pertaining to Use Value Assessment Revalidation Fees. 5. Ordinance amending Chapter 7, "Building Regulations" of the Roanoke County Code providing for Appeals to be heard by the Building Code Board of Adjustments and Appeals, requiring owners of unsafe buildings to clear the lot after demolition and extending the duration of demolition permits from thirty to ninety days. I. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance accepting an offer for and authorizing the conveyance of an easement to Appalachian Power Company. J. APPOINTMENTS 1. Court Service Unit Advisory Council/Youth and Family Service Advisory Board. R. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS L. CONSENT AGENDA ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY. 1. Minutes of Meeting - February 10, 1987, February 18, 1987, February 24, 1987. 2. Confirmation of Committee Appointments to the League of Older Americans Advisory Board and the Transportation and Safety Commission. 2 3. Abandonment of Portions of the Old Chaparral Drive (Route 800 ) in Roanoke County. 4. Request for approval of a Raffle Permit for the Botetourt Jaycees. M. CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS N. REPORTS 1. Contingency Fund Balance 2. Statement of Expenditures for the Month ended January 31, 1987. 3. General Operating Fund Income Analysis. 4. Youth Haven II Status Report 5. Economic Development Update 6. Accounts Paid - February 1987 O. WORK SESSIONS 1. Design and Construction Standards for Water Facilities. 2. Status Report on the Reservoir Project. 3. Discussion of the proposed tax rate for 1987 and the budget process. P. EXECUTIVE SESSION pursuant to the Code of Virginia 2.1-344 (a). 4 ADJOURNMENT 3 ~-/ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 10, 1987 RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION TO NANCY M. WELCH, M.D., FOR HER DIRECTORSHIP OF THE ALLEGHANY HEALTH DISTRICT FROM 1976 TO 1987 BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors does hereby express its sincere appreciation to Nancy M. Welch, M.D. for devotion, innovation, productivity and excellence during her responsive administration as Director of the Alleghany Health District from 1976 to 1987; and WHEREAS, Dr. Nancy M. Welch has served with notable distinction on numerous community service projects. She helped to establish the district's first ATLV-III (AIDS) Virus Testing Site, and a Community Advisory Board of Directors to improve relations between area health departments and their constituents. Dr. Welch was a volunteer camp physician for Camp Easter Seal, for ten years, donated her time to the Free Clinic of the Roanoke Valley and was a Major in the U. S. Army Reserves, performing duties as a pediatrician attached to Fort Meade, Maryland. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors, on the behalf of the citizenry of Roanoke County and on its own part, expresses heartfelt gratitude to Dr. Nancy N. Welch for her outstanding contributions to Roanoke County. r AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 10, 1987 RESOLUTION 31087-1 OF APPRECIATION TO NANCY M. WELCH, M.D., FOR HER DIRECTORSHIP OF THE ALLEGHANY HEALTH DISTRICT FROM 1976 TO 1987 BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors does hereby express its sincere appreciation to Nancy M. Welch, M.D. for devotion, innovation, productivity and excellence during her responsive administration as Director of the Alleghany Health District from 1976 to 1987; and WHEREAS, Dr. Nancy M. Welch has served with notable distinction on numerous community service projects. She helped to establish the district's first ATLV-III (AIDS) Virus Testing Site, and a Community Advisory Board of Directors to improve relations between area health departments and their constituents. Ur. Welch was a volunteer camp physician for Camp Easter Seal, for ten years, donated her time to the Free Clinic of the Roanoke Valley and was a Major in the U. S. Army Reserves, performing duties as a pediatrician attached to Fort Meade, Maryland. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors, on the behalf of the citizenry of Roanoke County and on its own part, expresses heartfelt gratitude to Dr. Nancy N. Welch for her outstanding contributions to Roanoke County. On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor Brittle, and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None A COPY - TESTE ~• Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors 3/12/87 CC: File ITEM NUMBER .~' AT A REGULNIAMHELDNATOTHEHROANORE OCOUNTYEADMINISTRATIONNCENTER COUNTY, VIRGI MEETING DATE: March 10, 1987 SUBJECT: First Reading - Adoption of an Ordinance "Water,"gofetheon 20.1-11 (a), (b), and (c) o.f Chapter 20, 1971 Roanoke County Code, which is Chapter 22, "Water," of. the 1985 Roanoke County Code COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~~ SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The current Water Ordinance, Section 20.1-11, parts (a), (b) and (c) contains standards and specifications which conflict with the pro- posed "Design and Cled rinto~dertto removerthise conflict1PSAffected parts will be repea Section 20.1-11 is attached. FISCAL IMPACT: N/A RECOMMENDATION: The staff recommends that this ordinance be adopted after a Second Reading on March 24, 1987, concurrently with the resolution adopting the proposed "Design and Construction Standards for Water Facilities." SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: .. Cliff_o aig, P.E. Elmer C. Hodg Utilities Director County Administrator -'--- ACTION - VOTE No Yes Abs Approved ( ) Motion by: Brittle Denied ( ) Garrett Received ( ) Johnson Referred McGraw To Nickens OF SUPEE2VISORS OF ROANOKE ~/ - AT A REC~~1R MEETING OF THE BOARD ACi~IINISTRATION COUt~TI'Y - VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANpKE OOUNrY ~~ - ON 'TUESDAY , MARCH 10 , 1987 ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 20.1-11 OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE (1971) BY THE REPEAINONG S TO S CERTOAIN a )STANDARDSD AND PERTA SPECIFICATIONS WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading of this ordinance was held on March 10, 1987, a second reading was held on March 24, 1987, and a public hearing was held thereon on March 24, 1987, concerning an ordinance amending and repealing portions of the Roanoke County Code pertaining to the design of water mains, valves and hydrants; and WHEREAS, Section 20.1-11 of Chapter 20, "Water," of the 1971 Roanoke County Code (Chapter 22, "Water," of the 1985 Roanoke County Code) provides for certain standards and specifica- tions for water mains, valves and fire hydrants; and WHEREAS, said standards and specifications conflict with certain proposed "Design and Construction Standards for Water Facilities"; and WHEREAS, said proposed "Design and Construction Stan- dards for Water Facilities" were adopted by resolution of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, contemporaneous- ly with the adoption of this ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervi- sors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: f--/ - ~ 1, That Section 20.1-11 of the Roanoke County Code (1971) is amended and portions thereof repealed to read and pro- vide as follows: Sec. 20.1-11. Design of mains; values and hydrants. All mains, valves, hydrants, fittings and accessories shall be designed to withstand a normal working pressure of not less than one hundred and fifty pounds per square inch and shall con- form to the specifications of the American Water Works Associa- tion, state regulations and county specifications and standards adopted by the board by resolution and in effect at the time of approval. {a}- A4alss : - - A4al~s- s~iall- be- six- l~ehes ; - l~slde- e7lamete~ ; - ex- eept- ln- the- ease- ef- e7eael-eel- streets- e~- w~ie~e- ased- papa}le}- to s.i~-~r~el~-ma~r~s-ee-~a~ge~-ma~~s-leeateel-va~th~n-t~ie-sate-street-e€ ~lgl~t-ef-wap:--~~-~e-ease-shah-amp-watermain-be-less-t~ia~-fear lnel~es; -l~slele-e1}amete~---Pie-watermalr~-se~"~l~~J-erne-e~-mere-f lie l~pe7~ar~ts-shall-be-less-tl~ar~-six-}r~ehes; -l~slele-dlamete~ : --~nstal- latlen- ef- a- hpd~a~t- ems- exlstl~g- lines- with- ate- l~slele- ellamete~ less-than-six-lnel~es-mast-be-app~e~ed-bp-the-e7l~eete~:--All-eleael- er~el- water maps- s~iall- l~a~*e- aelee~aate-blew-ef ~- yal~es- e~- f }~e- hp- el~ants- at- the- er~el- tl~eeee€- }~- aeee~elanee- wltl~- the- speelf leatlens al`i~-9ta19~a~~s:--Aatematle-alp-gel}ef-~al~es-shall-be-l~stallee7-at tl~e- high- paints- ef- watee- mains- wl~e~e- aeeamalatle~- a€- alp- map }ate~fe~e-with-the-flew- {b}-Napes : - -All- ~al~es-shall- eper~- te-the-left-- - Raeh-vale shall-be-aeeesslble-fey-epe~atlen-with-sta~ela~el-valve-}yep-th~eagh a-valve-bex-exteneling-te-the-g~ear~el-sa~f aee f/-I - d~an~s- sl~a}}- Y~aye- ~~ae- ewe- anel- ene-ha}~ fe}-~}~e-H~re~~an~s.- H~ e~t~ e~- ne~~}e: ane7- ene-lea}~- }neh- ~ ~ anel- ene- fete- ~e~}e1e-a }yep- ne~~}es- aske~s-fie-p e~~}e-eaps-sha}}-He-p~e~a}dee7-w}~}3-sty}~aH}e-~ eha}nee? Pi s sl~s}}-be-sees~e}~_ 6seh-eap ~}gl~~-sea}-H}~h-~l~e-Hess}es--- ~r~~s- sl~a}}- Y~a~e- ~l~e- sa~+e d~an~s:-- Eap- ~e- the- ~a~~e}- ef- the- h~ -n~~-ef-~l~e-}~~e7~an~: --~Fhe-sl$e-a€-~l~e ~l~e-ege~a~ing d}teens}ens-as- -ef-~Y~e-l~~d~an~-sY~a}}-fie-net-}ess-~l~an-€er~~-a eY~ pan ~-a}n-~aa}tee-epen~ng --~pl~e-hpd~an~-sha}}-eennee~-~e-a-s}x-}nel~ nos ene-lea}~-}nel~es : ale-~a}ye: --Hpd~a } e- }}ne- }n-rah}el~- ls- }eea~ee7-an- }se}a~}~~-~f ~e~+- ~l~e-edge- of - ape ~ ~ sl~a}}-be-}eea~eel-net-mere-~l~an-~vae}tee feed- a~e~-s~s~e~+s-se~~}ng e7}~ee~e~ : -}~ ~ pa~emen~-ran}ess-at~~l~e~}peel-b~- _ ands-spa}}-He-lns~a}}ed-se-~l~a~-~l~e~e-va}}} s~bd}~}s}ens;-~}~e h~d~ -~a}~h}n-fer~~-l~anel~ed-feed-a€-~~ie-een~e~ e€ d~an~ s s~e~+- be-a~-}easy-ene-1~~ }e~- se~~ed- b~- steep- ~ }}ne- of - eaei~- ~l~e- f ~en~- p~epe~~~- } f- gees}~}e ~s- sl~a}}- be- }eee~ed- a~- s~~ee~- }n~e~see~}ens ; - H~el~an the effective date of this ordinance shall e 2, That March 24, 1987. r s ITEM NUMBER /'~' - 2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER IN ROANOKE, VA., ON TUESDAY, MEETING DATE: March 10, 1987 SUBJECT: Authorizing conveyance of real estate from the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County to the County School Board of Roanoke County COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: L%~~~r)Zlyd~I2~~ ~!' ' ~ ry~ ~~ SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Board of Supervisors is conveying surplus County real estate to the School Board for future educational purposes. FISCAL IMPACT: None. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the County Administrator be autho- rized to execute such documents and take such actions as may be necessary to accomplish this transaction. Respectfully submitted, y~` `~~,\~.u~' ~~ '~r~ ~ `r `~ ,~~ c,~ ~ teat, ,~~ Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney ------------ VOTE------ ACTION Approved ( ) Motion by: Denied ( ) No Yes Abs Received ( } Referred To Britt) e Garrett Johnson McGraw Nickens AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD F ~/ 0 SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, ON TUESDAY, MARCH 10, 1987 ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE CONVEYANCE OF APPROXIMATELY 32 ACRES OF REAL ESTATE FROM THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY TO THE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading on the disposition and conveyance of the hereinafter-described real estate was held on March 10, 1987. A second reading on this matter was held on March 24, 1987. This real estate is located west of Salem, ad- joining Glenvar High School; and 2. That the conveyance of approximately 32 acres of real estate from the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County to the County School Board of Roanoke County is hereby authorized and approved; and 3. That the County Administrator is authorized to exe- cute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County as are necessary to accomplish the conveyance of this pro- perty, all of which shall be upon form approved by the County Attorney. ITEM NUMBER /y - AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER IN ROANOKE, VA., ON TUESDAY, MARCH 10, 1987 MEETING DATE: March 10, 1987 SUBJECT: First reading of an ordinance to convey to the Virginia Department of Transportation 0.093 acres for right of way on Rt. 601 (Old Hollins Road). COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~ ~~~ ~~ SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Department of Transportation is in the process of acquiring the right of way needed for the widening of State Route 601 (Old Hollins Road). This road passes to the Eastern side of property owned by the County near the Amp site. The right of way needed includes 0.093 acres of land, 0.003 acres in permanent easement, 0.153 acres in temporary easement, an additional utility easement and the need to reset two iron pins. The offer to cover this transaction and all related damages is $3,450.00, which the County Assessor has agreed is the fair market value. Staff also feels that all improvements to this roadway will have a positive impact on the marketing of this tract. FISCAL IMPACT STATEMENT The state has offered $3,450.00 for the acquisition of land easements and allowance to reset two iron pins and any and all damages. RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommends that the first reading of this ordinance be held on March 10, 1987; that the second reading be held on March 24 and that the County Administrator be authorized to execute the necessary documents to consummate this transaction. SUBMITTED BY: John M. Chambliss, Jr. Assistant County Administrator APPROVED: Elmer C. Ho ge County Administrator f-1-.3 -- ---- ------------------------ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs Approved ( ) Motion by: Brittle Denied ( ) Garrett Received ( ) Johnson Ref erred McGraw To Nickens ~-~ 3 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGCEN ER H ONDTUESDAY, MARCOHK10CO1987 ADMINISTRATION ORDINANCE ACCEPTING AN OFFER FOR AND AUTHORIZING THE CONVEYANCE OF SURPLUS REAL ESTATE ON ROUTE 601 (OLD HOLLINS ROAD) BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading concerning the sale and disposition of the hereinafter-described real estate was held on March 10, 1987. A second reading was held on March 24, 1987. This real estate is located on Route 601 (Old Hollins Road) and consists of 0.093 acre of land in fee, 0.003 acre in permanent easement, 0.153 acre in temporary easement, and an addi- tional utility easement; and 2. That offers having been received for this surplus real estate on Route 601 (Old Hollins Road), the offer of the Virginia Department of Transportation in the amount of $3,450.00 is hereby accepted and all other offers are rejected; and 3. That the County Administrator is authorized to exe- cute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County as are necessary to accomplish the conveyance of said pro- perty, all of which shall be upon form approved by the County Attorney. ITEM NUMBER / T " AT A REGULAR MEETING OF T1IE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HINDROANOKE,ROANOKEONCOUESDAYDMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 10, 1987 SUBJECT: Amending Section 21-52(e) of the Roanoke County Code pertaining to use value assessment revalidation fees COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: i ±~gxs'~taa,~z.~ ~,~~.~rGG~ SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Section 21-52(e) of the Roanoke County Code provides for a use value assessment revalidation fee every five years. Section 58.1-3234 of the Code of Virginia provides for a use value assessmen ctiona 21a 52 (e) ofe theeCounty Code sto comply ow d h athe amends Se state statute. The ffirst 967d the secondlread Pg ses scheduled for Marchu24a for March 10, 1 , 1987. FISCAL IMPACT: None. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors favorably consider the adoption of this ordinance amendment. Respectfully submitted, ;. Paul M. Mahoney ;!, County Attorney -------------------------ACTION ---------- VOTE Rln YPS AbS Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred To Motion by: Brittle Garrett Johnson McGraw Nickens ~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, ON TUESDAY, MARCH 10, 1987 ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 21-52(e) OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE PERTAINING TO USE VALUE ASSESSMENT REVALIDATION FEES WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading was held on March 10, 1987, a second reading was held on March 24, 1987, and a public hearing was held on March 24, 1987, concerning an ordinance amending Section 21-52(e) of the Roanoke County Code pertaining to use value assessment revalidation fees; WHEREAS, Section 21-52(a), Article III, Division 2 of Chapter 21 of the Roanoke County Code provides for property owners to submit an application for taxation on the basis of use assessment; and WHEREAS, Section 21-52(e), Article III, Division 2 of Chapter 21 of the Roanoke County Code provides that property owners must revalidate annually with the County Assessor any such application previously approved and imposes a revalidation fee at a five-year (5) interval; and WHEREAS, Section 58.1-3234 of the Code of Virginia (1950) as amended, authorizes the local governing body of a County by ordinance to impose a revalidation fee at a six-year (6) interval. NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to the Code of Virginia (1950) as amended, be it ordained by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That Section 21-52(e) be amended to read and provide as follows: Section 21-52(e). A property owner must revalidate annually with the County assessor any applications previously approved. A re- ~--~- validation fee is hereby imposed at a ~~~e {5} six (6? year interval, such fee to be in the amount of the original application fee. Revalidation forms may be filed late on or before the effective date of the assessment upon the payment of a late filing fee of double the original application fee. 2. That the effective date of this ordinance shall be April 1, 1987. ITEM NUMBER ~ " AT A REGULAR MELDI AT TOHE ROANOKER COUONTY A MINISTRATOIONROCENOTER COUNTY, VIRGINIA H IN ROANOKE, VA., ON TUESDAY, MEETING DATE: March 10, 1987 SUB_ Ordinance Amending Chapter 7, "Building Reguealso to be the Roanoke County Code Providing for App heard by the Building Code Board of Adjustments and Appeals, requiring owners of unsafe buildings to clear the lot after demolition, and extending the duration of demolition permits from thirty to ninety days COUNT/~Y ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Section 7-62 of the Roanoke County Code provides that appeals from decisions of the Chief Building Official will be heard by the Board of Supervisors. The proposed amendment will channel all appeals relative to uns ealsbuilThiss ame ame nulwouid Code Board of Adjustments and App therefore relieve the Board of Supervisors from having to inspect the site of the alleged violation. In addition, the Building Code Board of Adjusisento the appealsprocesse able to bring their professional expert Section 7-66, Notice to repair or demolish, requires the owner of an unsafe building to repair or demolish the structure, but does not presently require the owner to clear the site of debris from the demolished building. This amendment would add that requirehentublicu nuesanceaprocedure to haver theesiteu clear proceed by t p ed. Section 7-67.1, Demolition permit, stipulates that demoli- tion permits shall be valid for thirty days. The Chief Building Official has found that thirty days does not allow the permittee sufficient time to engage a contractor and complete the demoli- tion. Extending the duration of the permit to ninety days will remedy this deficrant extensions ofe the original permCtief Build- ing Official to g FISCAL IMPACT: None. RECOMMENDATION: ~/~ It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors adopt these ordinance amendments. Respectfully submitted, ames T. N' i ger, Jr. hief Buil i g Official Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney VOTE ACTION No Yes Abs Approved ( ) Motion by: Brittle Denied ( ) Garrett Received ( ) Johnson Referred McGraw To Nickens ~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, ON TUESDAY, MARCH 10, 1987 ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 7, "BUILDING REGULATIONS" OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE PROVIDING FOR APPEALS TO BE HEARD BY THE BUILDING CODE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS AND APPEALS, REQUIRING OWNERS OF UNSAFE BUILDINGS TO CLEAR THE LOT AFTER DEMOLI- TION, AND EXTENDING THE DURATION OF DEMOLITION PERMITS FROM THIRTY TO NINETY DAYS BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That Chapter 7, "Building Regulations" of the Roanoke County Code is hereby amended and reenacted as follows: ARTICLE IV. UNSAFE BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES Sec. 7-62. Appeals from decisions rendered under article. (a) A decision rendered by the building official in the enforcement of this article may be appealed to the beare7-ef 9tl~l°rK~9®r9 Building Code Board of AdZustments and Appeals, provided such appeal is made within ten (10) days in a manner and form to be specified by the building official; provided, however, not subject to appeal. Before rendering a decision in favor of the appellant, the bearel- ef- se~per~~9ers Build i_. ng Code Board of Adjustments and Ap eals must serve as a committee of the whole and conduct an on-site investigation of the building or structure in question and clearly determine that the condition of the same poses no threat to the health, safety or general welfare of the citizens of the county. (b) The failure of any person to abide by the decision of the beard- ef- 9e~per~~ser9 Building Code Board of Adjust- ments and Appeals after an appeal pursuant to this section shall constitute a Class 2 misdemeanor and be subject to legal action by the building official. Sec. 7-66. Notice to repair or demolish--Generally. (a) If an unsafe condition is found in a building or structure, the building official shall serve on the owner, agent or person in control of the building or structure a written notice describing the building or structure deemed unsafe and t-/-.~ specifying the required repairs or improvements too ber mgade ing render the building or structure safortion ther of, to be demo the unsafe building or structure or p lished within a stipulated tim ure Ihetsh be fu thert rel ua red re uired to demolish the struct da s to clear the demolition site demolitdonris Su hlnotice shall re- after the com letion of th quiire the person thus notifiee o °remection of thecterms of the building official his acceptanc J notice. (b) If the owner, agent or person in control after building or structure once treferred d o i h subsectionn(a) above diligent search, the n shall be sent by registered or certified mail to the last osted address of such person and a copy of such noticeocedurebshall be in a conspicuous place on the premises. Such p deemed the equivalent of personal notice. The cost of any work required by a notice given (c) pursuant to this sectionls haiv n e the responsibility of t e per- son to whom such notice 9 (d) Failure to cosectionlshall constitutee at Class 2 notice given pursuant to this misdemeanor. Sec. 7-67.1. Demolition permit. The owner or his agent shall secure a demolition permit to demolish an unsafe building or structure. Any demolition per- mit issued under this section shall be valid for ~1~~~~p- {3A} ninety (90) days. 2. This ordinance shall take effect April 1, 1987. ITEM NUMBER ..~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER IN ROANOKE, VA., ON TUESDAY, MEETING DATE: March 10, 1987 SUBJECT: Conveying deed of easement across Stonebridge Park Property COUNTY~ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Appalachian Power Company has requested an easement from the County for the purpose of transmitting electric power. This ease- ment would grant APCo the authority to construct, erect, install, operate, and maintain line or lines, including electric service lines and extensions therefrom across property owned by the County. It is necessary for the County to authorize this convey- ance by ordinance. The first reading was held on February 24, 1987; the second reading is scheduled for March 10, 1987. FISCAL IMPACT: $1.00 consideration from APCo RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the County Administrator be autho- rized to execute such documents and take such actions as may be necessary to accomplish this transaction, upon the approval as to form by the County Attorney. Respectfully submitted, Paul M. County ,, j~',~ ~~ ' ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~~~ Mahoney Attorney ------------ ------------------------- Approved ( ) Motion by: ACTION VOTE Denied ( ) No Yes Abs Received ( ) Referred To Brittle Garrett Johnson McGraw Nickens .~ ~ ~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT `PHE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, ON TUESDAY, MARCH 10, 1987 ORDINANCE ACCEPTING AN OFFER FOR AND AUTHORTZING THE CONVEYANCE OF AN EASEMENT TO APPALACHIAN POWER COMPANY BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of §18.04 of the Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading on the disposition of the hereinafter-described easement was held on February 24, 1987. A second reading on this matter was held on March 10, 1987. This easement is located on the northeasterly side of Tulip Lane, near Virginia Route 24, across Stonebridge Park property; and 2. That the conveyance of the easement from the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors to Appalachian Power Company is accomplished by deed dated January 19, 1987, and is hereby authorized and approved; and 3. That the County Administrator is authorized to exe- cute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County as are necessary to accomplish the conveyance of said ease- ment, all of which shall be upon form approved by the County Attorney. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, ON TUESDAY, MARCH 10, 1987 ORDINANCE 31087-2 ACCEPTING AN OFFER FOR AND AUTHORIZING THE CONVEYANCE OF AN EASEMENT TO APPALACHIAN POWER COMPANY BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of §18.04 of the Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading on the disposition of the hereinafter-described easement was held on February 24, 1987. A second reading on this matter was held on March 10, 1987. This easement is located on the northeasterly side of Tulip Lane, near Virginia Route 24, across Stonebridge Park property; and 2. 'that the conveyance of the easement from the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors to Appalachian Power Company is accomplished by deed dated January 19, 1987, and is hereby authorized and approved; and 3. That the County Administrator is authorized to exe- cute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County as are necessary to accomplish the conveyance of said ease- ment, all of which shall be upon form approved by the County Attorney. On motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by Supervisor McGraw, and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None A COPY - TESTE ~• Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors 3/12/87 CC: File Director of Utilities Engineering County Attorney Commonwealth's Attorney Magistrate Main Library Roanoke Law Library Sheriff's Department .~ ITEM NUMBER ~ -' f AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 10, 1987 SUBJECT: Appointments to Committees COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: 1. Court Service Unit Advisory Council-Youth and Family Services Advisory Board. Two-year terms of the Reverend H. Fleet Powell, Cave Spring Magisterial District; Ted R. Powell, Cave Spring Magisterial District; and Jane Renick, Windsor Hills Magisterial District. Their terms expire 3/22/87. One-year term of Rick Robers, Youth Member, Cave Spring Magisterial District. His term expires 3/22/87 See attached for information concerning this committee. Submitted By: ~_ Mary H. Allen Deputy Clerk Approved By: ~y Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: _ No Yes Ab: Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred To Brittle Garrett _ Johnson McGraw Nickens - ._T- / COURT SERVICES UNIT ADVISORY COUNCIL/YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES ADVISORY BOARD A. COMPOSITION Board to consist of two members from each magisterial district, and one youth member from each high school. Governing bodies of each co~.nty and city served by a court service unit may appoint one or more members to a citizen advisory council. B. DUTIES• such persons, institutions or associations. The Council should make themselves familiar with the work of the court. Makes an annual report to the court and the participating governing bodies on the work of the council. Encourage the members selected by the council to serve on the central advisory council to visit as often as the member conveniently can, institutions and associations receiving children under this law and to report to the court the conditions and surroundings of the children received by or in charge of any Advises and cooperates with the court upon all matters affecting the working of this law and other laws relating to children, their care and protection and to domestic relations; Consults and confer with the court and director of the court service unit relative to the development and extension of the court service program; As the Youth and Family Services Advisory Board: Establish goals and priorities for County-wide youth services; assist in coordination and planning for comprehensive youth services within the private sector. Serve in an advisory capacity and to otherwise assist the Board of Supervisors to establish goals and objectives in compliance with all "minimum Standards of the Delinquency Prevention and Youth Development Act of 1979". Assist in conducting an assessment of the needs of youth every five years and to assist in developing an annual Delinquency Prevention Plan, further to participate in evaluating the implementation of the plan and making a report thereon to the Board of Supervisors. Provide a public forum where concerns about youth may be expressed and to receive recommendations and raise concerns of public and private organizations at any regular advisory board meeting upon proper notice. Advocates necessary legislative amendments to improve community conditions for youth development and to support the development of needed services both public and private for youth in the community. C. MEETING SCHEDULE: One a quarter, the third Tuesday, beginning January;-time and place determined at meetings. ~©~®rnia~ ~resby~crian ~~nanrc~n 3550 Poplar Drive, S. W. Roanoke, Virginia 24018 H. FLEET POW ELL, JR. MINIfTER q ~i ~ 987 ?'ebr~iar}~ 5, 197 f~F I'r. Alan Brittle, Board of Capervisorti Court, of Roar.~o'Ee ?~oanoke Cou^.ty Admini~trat=.on Cent~-r ?. 0. Box ?_9?00 Roanoke, VA 211018 Dear r`r. Brittle: I believe tl;at my term as a member of the Court Ce-rvice Unit kdvisory Board expires in narcr of t~flis year. l TELEPNONEf: IAREA CODE 707) STUDY 774-2706 MANfE 774.5813 I am ti:riting to request that I not be re-appointed. Pfy schedule has been such that I have had to miss most of the meetings of this group. If this district is to be represented effectively, it should be by someone .-~':o can attend the meetings. Yours very- sine ely, ,` ~ ,~~ ~C~2'~_s H. Fleet Powell, J AT A REGULAR MEETING OF' THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 10, 1987 RESOLUTION N0. 31087-3 APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM L - CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. Z'hat that certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for March 10, 1987, designated as Item L - Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 4, inclusive, as follows: 1. Minutes of Meeting - February 10, 1987, February 18, 1987, February 24, 1987. 2. Confirmation of Committee Appointments to the League of Older Americans Advisory Board and the Transportation and Safety Commission. 3. Abandonment of Portions of the Old Chaparral Drive (Route 800 ) in Roanoke County. 4. Request for approval of a Raffle Permit for the Botetourt Jaycees. 2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this resolution. On motion of Supervisor Garrett, seconded by Supervisor Johnson, and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None r-~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 10, 1987 RESOLUTION NO. APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF` SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM L - CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That that certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for March 10, 1987, designated as Item L - Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 4, inclusive, as follows: 1. Minutes of Meeting - February 10, 1987, February 18, 1987, February 24, 1987. 2. Confirmation of Committee Appointments to the League of Older Americans Advisory Board and the Transportation and Safety Commission. 3. Abandonment of Portions of the Old Chaparral Drive (Route 800 ) in Roanoke County. 4. Request for approval of a Raffle Permit for the Botetourt Jaycees. 2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this resolution. February 10, 1987 Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Roanoke County Administration Center 3738 Brambleton Avenue, Sw Roanoke, Virginia 24018 February 10, 1987 The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, met this day at the Roanoke County Administration Center, this being the first Tuesday, and the first regularly scheduled meeting of the month of February, 1987. IN RE: CALL TO ORDER Chairman Johnson called the meeting to order at 2:10 p.m. The roll call was taken. MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Bob L. Johnson, Vice Chairman Leer. Garrett, Supervisors Alan H. Brittle,) Steven A. McGraw, Harry C. Nickens MEMBERS ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator; John M Chambliss Assistant County Administrator for Management Services; John R. Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator of Public Facilities; Timothy W. Gubala, Assistant County Administrator for Economic Development; Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney, Janet Holt-Johnstone, Public Information Officer; Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk; Linda Lehe, Assistant County Administrator; D. Keith Cook, Director of Humans Resources; Reta Busher, Director of the Budget; Clifford Craig, Director of Utilities; C. Jack Council, Director of Procurement; George Garretson, Library Director; Alfred Anderson, County Treasurer, Betty Lucas, Director of Social Services; Diane Hyatt, Director of Fiscal Management. L-/ IN RE: OPENING CEREMONIES L-/ February 10, 1987 -- - - . -- --- __ -- -- ---_ - -- --- - ------- -- _ ------- - - -- ___ _ -- -I~ The invocation was given by John M. Chambliss, ssistant County Administrator. The Pledge of Allegiance was ecited by all present. N RE: REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF c;ENDA ITEMS The County Administrator requested the addition of Item Recognition of Professional Secretary Designation. RE: PROCLAMATIONS RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS AND AWARDS 1 Resolution of Appreciation to Deputy Steve Lynch zd Sheriff W. Overton of the Franklin Count Sheriff's epartment: Chairman Johnson presented prepared resolutions to eputy Lynch and Sheriff Overton for their assistance to the oanoke County Sheriff';. ~:.p~rtment. Lt. Robert Strickler was resent to receive Sheriff Overton's resolution, and Deputy Steve ynch was present. Chairman Johnson moved the prepared esolution. The resolution was seconded by Supervisor Brittle. RESOLUTION 21087-1 TO SHERIFF W. Q. OVERTON AND DEPUTY STEVE A. LYNCH COMMENDING THEM FOR COOPERATION AND A S S I S T A N C E WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors does hereby express its incere commendation and appreciation to Sheriff w. Q. Overton of ranklin County, together with Deputy Steve A. Lynch for prompt nd efficient action when called by Roanoke County Officer T. R. gown from the scene of an office burglary. WHEREAS, Deputy Lynch, together with his dog, Radar, ssisted in tracking the suspect from the office to a residence here the arrest was made. February 10, 1987 WHEREAS, this incident was the third such occasion whey, Deputy Lynch has come to the aid of Roanoke County with Radar, resulting in arrests, and WHEREAS, Deputy Lynch is now assisting Roanoke County in the training of a dog for the Roanoke County Sheriff's Department,and, FURTHERMORE, that Sheriff W. Q. Overton, of Franklin County, gave his full permission and approval to Deputy Lynch to render this valuable service, and, iJOW, TranoFFnRE, gE IT RESOLVED by the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors, of Roanoke County, Virginia, on behalf of the citizens of Roanoke County, that Sheriff W. Q. Overton and Deputy Steve A. Lynch be commended for their outstanding contributions to Roanoke County. On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor Brittle, and the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None ~• Resolution of A reciation to Michael J. Sim son Roanoke Count Sheriff's De artment: Chairman Johnson presented a prepared resolution to Officer Simpson for his development of an inmate grievance procedure. Officer Simpson was present. Supervisor Brittle moved the prepared resolution. The motion was seconded by Chairman Johnson and carried by al unanimous recorded vote. RESOLUTION 21087-2 TO OFFICER MICHAEL J. SIMPSON ROANOKE COUNT RIFFS DEPARTMENT, IN APPRECIATION OF HIS OUTSTANDING ACHIEVEMENT IN RELATION TO INMATE GRIEVANCE PROCEDURES FOR THE ROANOKE COUNTY/SALEM JAIL FAC f t, ~'^1' rs~-; i ~~ 1=; ;,0-,-,-_;~ oy the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County 'irginia, as follows: L -- / February 10, 1987 -------- WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors does hereby express itsl sincere appreciation to Officer Michael J. Simpson for his >ersistence and effectiveness over a two year period in pursuit ~f the development, review and certification of inmate grievance procedures for the Roanoke County/Salem jail facility, and WHEREAS, certification of this procedure by the United States Department of Justice is an outstanding achievement, and, FURTHERMORE, the Honorable James C. Turk, Chief District Judge has congratulated Sheriff 0. S. Foster, the Roanoke County Sheriff's Department and Officer Michael J. Simpson on havinc promulgated such inmate grievance procedures, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Roanoke County Boar< of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, on behalf of the citizens of Roanoke County, that Officer Michael J. Simpson b~ commended for his outstanding contribution to Roanoke County. On motion of Supervisor Brittle, seconded by Supervisor Johnson and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None 3. Resolutions of A reciation to Michael F. Henninger, Paul B McElvein, James R. Lavinder, Timothy L. Edmondson and Kenneth W. Kern of the Roanoke Count Sheriff's Department: Chairman Johnson presented prepared resolutions to these gentlemen for receiving special recognition from the National Park Service for apprehending a criminal on the Blue Ridge Parkway. All gentlemen were present to receive the resolution. Sheriff 0. S. Foster was also present to congratulate the officers. Chairman Johnson moved the prepared resolution. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Brittle and carried by a unanimous recorded vote. L-/ February 10, 1987 RESOLUTION 21087-3 TO MICHAEL F. HENNINGER, PAUL B MCE?.VFIN, JAMES R. LAVINDER, TIMOTHY L. EDMONDSON AND KENNETH W. KERN OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY SHERIFF' DEPARTMENT, COMMENDING THEM FOR THE EXEMPLARY AN EFFECTIVE MANNER IN WHICH THEY HAVE PERFORMED THEI DUTIES L' BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanok County, Virginia, as follows: WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors does hereby expres its sincere appreciation to Michael F. Henninger, Paul B McElvein, James R. Lavinder, Timothy L. Edmondson, and Kenneth W. Kern for the professionalism exhibited in solving a homicid which occurred at the Roanoke River Overlook on September 21st, 1986, and WHEREAS, their quick action resulted in the arrest o Timothy Wade Spradlin in less than 12 hours after the occurrence, and WHEREAS, special commendation has been received fro Gary E. Everhardt, Superintendent, National Park Service, Unite States Department of the Interior specifying the Department' cooperation and willingness to assist during a period o emergency, thus gaining the respect and gratitude of all Blu R i d g e P a r k w a y R a n g e r s, a n NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Roanoke Count Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, on behalf o the citizens of Roanoke County, that Michael F. Henninger, Pau B. McElvein, James R. Lavinder, Timothy L. Edmondson, and Kennet W. Kern be commended for their outstanding contributions t Roanoke County. On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor Brittle, and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None 4. Presentation of an D. Keith Cook, Director of Human Resources, presented Servic Awards to those employees who were unable to attend the boar meeting on January 27, 1987. 5. Recognition of Professional Secretary Designation: County Administrator Elmer Hodge announced tha Administrative Secretary Wanda Riley and Legal Secretary Su February 10, 1987 / / - --- [_ --- ;ubala had recently completed the necessary courses and passed the examination to qualify as Certified Professional Secretaries. Chairman Johnson presented them with their certificates and congratulated them on their achievement. ZN RE: NEW BUSINESS 1. Re nest to include the Roanoke Count Courthouse on the Virginia Historic Landmarks Register: Assistant County Administrator Timothy Gubala reported that the Virginia Division of Historic Landmarks has been interested in including the Roanoke County Courthouse on the Virginia Landmarks Register and would also like to nominate the Courthouse to the National Register of Historic Places. A meeting will be held on February 17, 1987 to consider this placement. Designation as a landmark will result in several benefits to the County. Mr. Gubala also announced that the Salem Historical Society supported inclusion of the old Courthouse on the Virginia Landmarks Register. Supervisor Garrett moved to approve the prepared resolution and staff attendance at a hearing in Richmond. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Nickens. RESOLUTION 21087-4 REQUESTING CONSIDERATION FOR THE OLD COURTHOUSE OF ROANOKE COUNTY FOR INCLUSION ON THE VIRGINIA LANDMARKS REGISTER AND SUBSEQUENT NOMINATION IN THE NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: WHEREAS, Roanoke County has requested that the old courthouse be included on the Virginia Landmarks Register as a classic example of early 20th Century architectural design; and, WHEREAS, the Virginia Department of Conservation and Historic Resources is reviewing Roanoke County's request for inclusion on the State Landmarks Register and is considering February 10, 1987 nominating the structure to the National Register of Histori Places as maintained by the Department of the Interior. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved that the Board o Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, does earnestly support both these actions to recognize the historic and architectural significance of the old Roanoke County Courthouse and request its inclusion on the Virginia Landmarks Register and its nominations to the National Register of historic Places. On motion of Supervisor Garrett, seconded by Supervisor Nickens, and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None 2. Request from the Department of Social Services to participate in a Work Experience Program: Robert Lipes, Senio Employment Service Worker, announced that Roanoke County has a opportunity to participate in a Work Experience Program as work-site provider. This program is administered through th Roanoke County and Virginia Department of Social Services, an will allow participants who presently received Federal Aid t Dependent Children to learn the skills necessary to locate a jo and become self sufficient. Other local businesses and agencie will also be asked to participate. The Department of Huma Resources will serve as the liaison of this program. Supervisor Johnson asked who would assume the liabili and Workmen's Compensation for these workers. County Attorne Paul Mahoney stated the Attorney General has ruled tha liability for such programs would not fall upon the participate locality participating. However, nothing has been litigate under this ruling as yet. Supervisor Brittle asked how many people would b participating in the program. Mr. Lipes responded tha approximately 15 would be participating and Workman' Compensation would be handled by the Commonwealth of Virginia. L -/ February 10, 1987 ~" / Supervisor Garrett moved to approve the prepared resolution. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Brittle. RESOLUTION 21087-5 AUTHORIZING THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE TO PARTICIPATE IN THE WORK EXPERIENCE PROGRAM IN COOPERATION WITH THE ROANOKE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: WHEREAS, the County of Roanoke, believing it to be in the best interest of the County, desires to participate in the Work Experience Program pursuant to the provision of Title 63.1 of the Code of Virginia; and WHEREAS, the Work Experience Program is administered by the Commonwealth of Virginia Department of Social Services. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the County Administrator is authorized to sign such documents as necessary to participate in the Work Experience Program. FURTHER, the Roanoke County Department of Human Resources is designated as the program liaison between the County and the County Department of Social Services. On motion of Supervisor Garrett, seconded by Supervisor Brittle, and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None 3 Agreement to reimburse Developer of Fairway Forest Estates for Off-site Facilities: Clifford Craig, Director of Utilities stated that the developer of Fairway Forest Estates, William Reid, is installing a water pump station anc 90,00 gallon water storage tank. The staff is recommending that the County Administrator be authorized to execute a reimbursement agreement for 100 percent of the costs associated with the off-site water facilities. The Developer has also requested that the total cost include 10 percent interest on the outstandinc amount due. February 10, 1987 Supervisor Garrett moved to approve the staff's recommendation. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Nickens and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None 4. Request for Approval of the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission Contract: County Administrator Elmer C. Hodge briefed the Board on the main points of the Contract. Roanoke City will transfer its ownership interest in the airport to a newly-formed Commission. Future expansion of the airport would be funded by the Commission which would issue its own bonds. If there is a operating deficit, Roanoke City would assume 60~ of! the cost and Roanoke County would assume 408 of the cost. The Commission will consist of five members; three appointed by the City and two appointed by the County. The County will pay to the Commission a base service fee of $264,640 per year for fiscal years 1988 through 1996, due 30 days after the conclusion of each fiscal year. County Attorney Paul Mahoney presented a schedule of events which will take approximately two to four months to complete. Both bond counsel and special counsel retained by the City and County will review the contract. Both localities will adopt a resolution creating the Commission, and appoint their representatives to the Commission. The document will then be executed by both localities and the newly created Commission,' hopefully at an official signing ceremony. Charles Hall, 6545 Pendleton Avenue spoke to the Board's concerning the noise level from the airport to surrounding homes, - in the County. Supervisor Johnson pointed out that when the Commission is in force, the County will have a better opportunity to support the complaints of the residents in that area concerning the noise levels. February 10, 1987 L - / Supervisor Brittle moved the appointment of Superviso Johnson to a three-year term on the Commission. Superviso Johnson nominated Supervisor Garrett to a four-year term. Supervisor Garrett moved the appointments be approve and that the prepared resolution be adopted. The motion wa seconded by Supervisor Brittle. RESOLUTION 21087-8 CREATING THE ROANOKE REGIONAL AIRPORT COMMISSION AND APPOINTING COMMISSIONERS THERETO WHEREAS, the General Assembly for the Commonwealth o Virginia enacted certain legislation known as the "Roanoke Region al Airport Commission Act," said legislation being found in th Acts of the Assembly, 1986, Chapter 140; and WHEREAS, said legislation provides for the creation o a commission known as the "Roanoke Regional Airport Commission. for the purpose of establishing and operating an airport and ai navigation facilities for Roanoke County and Roanoke City; autho rizes other political subdivisions to join such commission; an prescribes the rights, powers, duties and functions of such com mission; and WHEREAS, the County and the City have successfully com pleted negotiations to enter into a contract to implement th aforesaid legislation. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the Board of Super visors of Roanoke County, Virginia: 1. That it is hereby declared that there is a need fc an airport commission to be created for the purpose of establist ing or operating an airport, or landing field, for the County r Roanoke, the City of Roanoke, or any other political subdivisi~ which may join or participate therein, and that said County a'. City shall hereby unite in its formation, to be known as t "Roanoke Regional Airport Commission." Upon the adoption of th resolution, and the adoption of a similar resolution by the Ci Council for the City of Roanoke, said airport commission sha February 10, 1987 L" thereupon exist for the County and the City, and shall exercise its powers and functions as prescribed in Acts of the Assembly, 1986, Chapter 140. 2. That the powers of the commission shall be vested in the commissioners thereof. The County of Roanoke hereby appoints two (2) members to the Commission: Lee Garrett for a~'; I term of four (4) years, and Bob L. Johnson for a term of three (3) years. After this initial term each commissioner shall be appointed for a four (4) year term or until his successor is appointed and qualified. The Board of Supervisors is empowered to remove at any time, without cause, any commissioner appointed by it and appoint a successor commissioner to fill the unexpired portion of the removed commissioner's term. On motion of Supervisor Garrett, seconded by Supervisor Brittle, and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None Supervisor Brittle moved that the Chairman and County Administrator be authorized to execute the Airport Commission Contract following appropriate legal approvals. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Nickens and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson II NAYS: None 5. Request for approval to exercise option on a Well Lot: Phillip Henry, Director of Engineering announced that Geotechnics, Inc. had located a potential well site on the property of Richard H. Lowe, Jr. Mr. Lowe has requested 51,000 for placing an option to purchase the property and $8,000 for purchase of the well site. Roanoke County will drill a test well, and if the well is satisfactory, the option to purchase will be exercised. Funds to purchase the option and well lot will come from the 1985 bond monies. February 10, 1987 ---- - ~~ / Supervisor Nickens moved that the offer be accepted an that the County Admir.i~trator be authorized to execute th necessary agreement. The motion was seconded by Superviso Brittle and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None 6 Request to borrow short-term in Anticipation of_ Taxes: County Treasurer Alfred Anderson stated that due to the new tax laws, the County can no longer use bond proceeds which. could generate interest income to use until tax monies are due. Because of this, it is necessary to borrow up to $10,000,000 it anticipation of taxes which will become due on May 31 and June 5, Other localities are also having the same problems as Roanoke County. Mr. Hodge asked the Board to remain flexible on the amount to be borrowed because it might be advantageous t~ borrow the entire amount rather than only the amount necessary. Supervisor Nickens moved the prepared resolution. Thy motion was seconded by Supervisor Johnson. RESOLUTION 21087-12 AUTHORIZING CREATION OF DEBT IN ANTICIPATION OF REVENUE BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the Treasurer of Roanoke County, Alfred C Anderson, is hereby authorized to borrow a sum of money not t exceed Ten Million Dollars ($10,000,000), at a rate of interes not to exceed six percent (6$), by the creation of a debt i anticipation of the collection of the revenue of the County, i order to meet casual deficits in the revenue of the County; and 2. That said borrowing will not exceed one-half of th amount reasonably anticipated to be produced by the County lev to be collected during the current fiscal year. Further sai borrowing is specifically authorized by the provisions of Sectio 15.1-545 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended; and February 10, 1987 L-/ 3. That the Treasurer of Roanoke County is authorized to borrow such sum of money at an interest rate as aforesaid, and to execute such documents necessary to accomplish the purposes of this resolution, upon the utilization of competitive principles and upon the approval of said documents by the County Attorney. On motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by Supervisor Johnson and the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None IN RE: REQUEST FOR WORK SESSIONS Chairman Johnson announced there would be a joint work session with the School Board on February 24, 1987, following the afternoon session. Timothy Gubala, Assistant County Administrator, requested a work session on the 419 Development Plan to be held on March 10, 1987. i ~ IN RE: REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS Chairman Johnson announced there would be a Public Hearing on Wednesday, February 18, 1987 on the Petitions of Richfield Retirement Community and Nusing Home, and Edinburgh Square for support for tax exempt status. SIN RE: FIRST hi'riL1NG OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance authorizing the acquisition of easements, Starkey Force Main and Gravity Sewer Project: February 10, 1987 --- ----- County Attorney Paul Mahoney reported that it is necessary to acquire approximately sixteen easements to complet the Starkey Force Main and Gravity Sewer Project. The propose ordinance would authorize the County Administrator to execute th necessary documents to accomplish this. The costs for this projects will be paid from the 1974 sewer bond proceeds. Supervisor Nickens moved to approve the first readin of this ordinance. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Johnson and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None 2. Ordinance authorizin the ac uisition of easements, East 460 Water Line: Mr. Mahoney stated this was similar to the first ordinance. In order to complete the East 460 Water Line Project, it is necessary to acquire approximately nine easements, and the County Administrator would execute the necessary documents. The costs for this project shall be paid from the 1985 bond proceeds. Supervisor Nickens moved to approve the first readinc of the ordinance. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Brittle and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None IN RE: SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance amendin Cha ter 21 "Taxation" of the Roanoke Count Code rovidin for a ments in lieu of real ro ert taxation im osin a service char a on certain real .,.-n.,art_v~ valuation, calculations of service char a exem tions therefrom, ap e_~als: Mr. Mahoney announced that following the first readin of the ordinance on January 27, 1987, he mailed letters to a L-/ February 10, 1987 ~ / many agencies as possible who would be affected by the service charge. Also, since the first reading, the ordinance had beenamended to exempt property owned by the Commonwealth of Virginia and the Town of Vinton. Mr. Mahoney recommended that this item be either tabled or postponed for further study, because of the potential implications for some of the agencies . If the ordinance is brought up again, the agencies will be informed. Supervisor Brittle moved that the ordinance be tabled until February 18, 1987. The motion was seconded by Supervisor McGraw and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None 2. Ordinance acceotina an offer for and authorizing the conveyance of surplus real estate, "Cooks Bottom" property: Mr. Mahoney announced that the first reading had been held on January 27, 1987. He recommended accepting the offer of the City of Salem in the amount of $162,500. The assessed value of the property is approximately $180,000 but the offer excluded the structures which can be removed from the property. The proceeds from the sale shall be returned to the Utilities Fund. Supervisor Nickens moved to accept the offer from the City of Salem and adopt the prepared ordinance. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Brittle. ORDINANCE 21087-10 ACCEPTING AN OFFER FOR AND AUTHORIZING THE CONVEYANCE OF SURPLUS REAL ESTATE, "COOKS BOTTOM" PROPERTY BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of §18.04 of the Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading concerning the sale ', and disposition of the hereinafter described real estate was held on January 27, 1987. A second reading on this matter was held on February 10, 1987 - - -- - ~ ~ r --- -- / --- ---- February 107, 1987. This real estate consists of approximatel 14.391 acres located in the City of Salem, Tax Map No. 255-1-1. 2. That offers having been received for the Cook Bottom property, the offer of the City of Salem in the amount o $162,500 is hereby accepted and all other offers are rejected; and 3. That the County Administrator is authorized to exe cute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanok County as are necessary to accomplish the conveyance of said pro perty, all of which shall be upon form approved by the Count Attorney. On motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by Supervisor Brittle, and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson i NAYS: None 3. Ordinance authorizin the ac uisition or a ri nr. of way across the Blue Ridge Parkway: Mr. Mahoney stated that the County has requested right of way for underycound water and sewer lines across th Blue Ridge Parkway to provide community water and sewer servic to the residents in the Clearbrook area. The first reading o the ordinance was held on January 27, 1987. Supervisor Nickens moved to adopt the prepare ordinance. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Brittle. ORDINANCE 21087-11 AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION OF A RIGHT OF WAY ACROSS THE BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanok County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of §18.04 of th Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading concerning th acquisition of a right of way across the Blue Ridge Parkway wa held on January 27, 1987. A second reading on this matter wa held on February 10, 1987. February 10, 1987 2. That this right of way grant is for underground water and sewer lines across the Blue Ridge Parkway. This project will provide community water and sewer service to th residents in the Clearbrook area of Roanoke County. 3. That the County Administrator is authorized t execute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanok County as are necessary to accomplish the conveyance of sai property, all of which shall be upon form approved by the Count Attorney. On motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by Supervisor Brittle, and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None IN RE: APPOINTMENTS There were no appointments to be made at this meeting. IN RE: REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS Supervisor Brittle: requested that Count Administrator Elmer Hodge investigate the possibility o advertising public hearings on Channel 11 on Cable TV. Supervisor McGraw: announced that the Hors Advisory Committee had been met several times and were movin forward with their plans for Green Hill Park. They will begi fund raising soon. Supervisor McGraw also announced that th Senate Committee of the General Assembly had voted 23 to 17 t support the annexation moratorium. ~/ IN RE: CONSENT AGENDA February 10, 1987 - --------_ ----rr- ------ Supervisor Brittle moved to approve the Consentll Resolution. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Garrett. RESOLUTION N0. 21087-13 APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM L - CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That that certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for February 10, 1987, designated as Item L' - Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 3, inclusive, as follows: 1. Minutes of Meeting - January 13, 1987 2. Approval of a Grant from the Virginia Foundation for the Humanities and Public Policy for the Roanoke County Public Library. 3. Appropriation of funds to the Roanoke Valley Constitution's Bicentennial Commission. 2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this resolution. On motion of Supervisor Brittle, seconded by Supervisor Garrett and the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None IIN RE: REPORTS The following reports were received by the Board of ~~Supervisors: 1. Youth Haven II Status Report 2. Contingency Fund Balance 3. Report on the Feasibility of Televising Board Meetings. L-/ February 10, 1987 Supervisor Brittle asked Mr. Hodge to investigate wh the shunt trip breaker switch for the range hood fire suppressio system had not been delivered to Youth Haven II. Superviso Johnson also asked that the Contingency Fund Balance date reflec January 13, 1987 instead of February 13, 1987, because a additional $500 was being deducted as the County's contributio to the Constitution's Bicentennial Commission on February 10 1987. IN RE: EXECU'T_VE SESSION At 3:30 p.m. Supervisor Nickens moved to go int Executive Session pursuant to the Code of Virginia 2.1-344 (a (6), (2) to discuss legal matters concerning the Richfiel litigation, the Red Lane annexation litigation, and the Board o Zoning Appeals litigation, and to discuss real estate. Th motion was seconded by Supervisor Brittle and carried by unanimous voice vote. IN RE: OPEN SESSION At 4:15 p.m. Supervisor Garrett moved to return to Oper Session. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Brittle any carried by a unanimous voice vote. IN RE: WORR SESSIONS 1. Review of the Comprehensive Plan and new Zoni Ordinance• Rob Stalzer, Director of Planning, Zoning and Grants, presented a work session on the changes and updates which hav I. been made to the Comprehensive Plan since it was originally ~-/ February 10, 1987 / / _ _ ~ --- prepared. He outlined the status of implementation of t] Community Facilities Plan, the project activities concerning t; development of the zoning ordinance, and reviewed prioritic which have been established. 2. Work Session on the Wastewater Facilities Plan• Director of Utilities, Clifford Craig announced the the City of Roanoke had completed a draft report on t} Wastewater Facilities Plan for the City. This plan will impro~ the Regional Wastewater Treatment Plan and replace a portion c the Roanoke River Interceptor and the Tinker Creek Interceptor He presented the estimated costs of the improvements ar. expansion and how this will affect Roanoke County. 3. Bucket Work Session: Director of Budget and Management Reta Busher presente the staff plans for developing the 1987/88 budget with th available funds. Mr. Hodge asked the Board members to establis priorities for the staff to follow in preparing the budget. Th Board established the following priorities: State Mandate salaries for Education, Economic Development, Implementation e the Bond Projects and Salaries. IN RE: RECESS At 5:15 p.m., Chairman Johnson declared a dinner break .l IN RE: EVENING SESSION At 7:30 p.m. Chairman Johnson called the meeting bac to order for the purpose of a Budget Work Session with the Fir and Rescue personnel. February 10, 1987 Tommy Fuqua, Fire and Rescue Chief, presented an updat on the Fire Training Center and the bond projects. He reports that the Volunteer Rescue and Fire Chiefs had requested tha several items be added, to the Fire and Resuce budget for 1987/88 He introduced Larry Wirt, Volunteer Rescue Chief, and Do Gillispie, Volunteer Fire Chief, who presented their requests t the board for review. IN RE: ADJOURNMENT At 8:55 p.m. Chairman Johnson adjourned the meeting February 18, 1987 at 9:00 a.m. for a special meeting. L / Bob L. Johnson, Chairman February 18, 1987 Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Roanoke County Administration Center 3738 Brambleton Avenue, SW Roanoke, Virginia 24018 February 18, 1987 The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors of Roanok County, Virginia, met this day at the Roanoke Count Administration Center, this being the 18th day of February, 198 and a special meeting adjourned from the regular meeting o February 10, 1987. IN RE: CALL TO ORDER Chairman Johnson called the meeting to order at 9:( a.m. and announced this was an adjourned meeting from Februaz 10, 1987. The roll call was taken. MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Bob L. Johnson, Vice Chairman Le Garrett, Supervisors Alan H. Brittle Steven A. McGraw, Harry C. Nickens MEMBERS ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator; Joh M. Chambliss, Assistant Count Administrator for Management Services Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney, Jane Holt-Johnstone, Public Information Officer; Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk; Jim Lehe Planner, John Peters, Coordinator o; Transportation; Rob Stalzer, Director o: Planning, Timothy Gubala, Assistant Count Administrator for Economic Development IN RE: PUBLIC HEARINGS: 287-1 Petition of Richfield Retirement Community and Richfield Nursing Center for adoption of a resolution requesting the General Assembly of Virginia to classify and designate as exempt from taxation, L -/ February 18, 1987 - ___ __ ir_ __ _ ursuant to Article X Section 6 (a) (6) of the Constitution ro ert owned b Richfield Retirement Communit and Richfield Nursing Center. County Administrator Elmer Hodge reported that in December of 1986, Richfield filed suit against Roanoke County protesting the taxation of that entity. The County has been meeting with representatives from Richfield Retirement Community and Richfield Nursing Center to negotiate a settlement to the litigation, and an agreement has been reached. Highlights of the settlement are that the County will tax operations of Richfield which are business entities, and Richfield will pay a negotiated sum in lieu of taxes for the remaining property, representing 20 percent of the amount of real property taxes based on the assessed real estate value. Roanoke County will also agree to support Richfield's application for tax exempt status with the General Assembly. Frank W. Rogers, Jr. represented Richfield Retirement Community and Nursing Home, and presented to the Board a history of Richfield from 1944 to the present. County Attorney Paul Mahoney stated that the staff had studied various alternatives to solving the problem including the service charge ordinance. Another approach is to negotiate a unique agreement with each entity seeking tax exempt status. It has been decided to negotiate an agreement with Richfield which includes sums in lieu of taxation. The Board must approve two separate resolutions of support for tax exempt status, one for' Richfield Retirement Community and one for Richfield Retirement Home. Supervisor Nickens moved that the prepared resolution of support for tax exempt status for Richfield Nursing Center be approved, and that the County Administrator and County Attorney be authorized to execute the necessary documents. The motion was seconded by Supervisor McGraw. ~- February 18, 1987 ----- -------- ----,r-- RESOLUTION 21887-1 TO THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY SUPPORTING TAX EXEMPTION OF PROPERTY OWNED BY RICHFIELD NURSING CENTER AND USED FOR CHARITABLE AND BENEVOLENT PURPOSES ON A NON PROFIT BASIS BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: WHEREAS, Richfield Nursing Center has requested this Board, pursuant to Section 30-19.04 of the Code of Virginia, as amended to adopt a resolution addressed to the General Assembly to classify and designate as exempt from taxation pursuant to Section 6 (a) (6) of Article X of the Constitution of Virginia, property located '^ the County of Roanoke, owned by it and used for charitable and benevolent purposes; and WHEREAS, a public hearing at which all citizens had an opportunity to be heard with respect to the request of Richfield Nursing Center was held by the Board of February 18, 1987; WHEREAS, the Board has examined and considered the provisions of subsection B of Section 30-19.04 of the Code of Virginia; BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke supports the classification and designation of Richfield Nursing Center as a charitable and benevolent organization; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board supports the, exemption from taxation of property located in the County of Roanoke, owned by Richfield Nursing Center, and used exclusively by it for charitable and benevolent purposes on a nonprofit basis. On motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by Supervisor McGraw, and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None Supervisor Nickens moved that the prepared resolution for tax exempt status for Richfield Retirement Community be approved, and that the County Administrator and County Attorney be L-/ February 18, 1987 authorized to execute the necessary documents. The motion wash seconded by Supervisor McGraw. RESOLUT2ON 21887-2 TO THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY SUPPORTING TAX EXEMPTION OF PROPERTY OWNED BY RICHFIELD RETIREMENT COMMUNITY AND USED FOR CHARITABLE AND BENEVOLENT PURPOSES ON A NONPROFIT BASIS BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanokell County, Virginia, as follows: WHEREAS, Richfield Retirement Community has requestedll this Board, pursuant to Section 30-19.04 of the Code of Virginia, as amended to adopt a resolution addressed to the General Assembly to classify and designate as exempt from taxation pursuant to Section 6 (a) (6> of Article X of the Constitution of Virginia, property located in the County of Roanoke, owned by it and used for charitable and benevolent purposes; and WHEREAS, a public hearing at which all citizens had an opportunity to be heard with respect to the request of Richfield Retirement Community was held by the Board of February 18, 1987; WHEREAS, the Board has examined and considered the (provisions of subsection B of Section 30-19.04 of the Code of ~~Virginia; BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke supports the classification and designation of Richfield Retirement Community as a charitable and benevolent ~~organization; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board supports the exemption from taxation of property located in the County of Roanoke, owned by Richfield Retirement Community, and used exclusively by it for charitable and benevolent purposes on a nonprofit basis. On motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by Supervisor McGraw, and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None L-/ February 18, 1987 L-f pursuant to Article X, Section 6(a)(6) of the Constitution of Virginia; and WHEREAS, a public hearing at which all citizens had an opportunity to be heard with respect to the Petitioner's request was held by the Board on February 18, 1987; and WHEREAS, the provisions of subsection B of Section 30-19.04, Code of Virginia (1950), as amended, have been examined and considered by the Board; and WHEREAS, the Petitioner agrees that the property to be exempt from taxation is the personal property of the Petitioner and its buildings and as much land as is reasonably necessary to the use of its buildings, provided such personal and real property shall be used by the Petitioner exclusively for charitable and benevolent purposes on non-profit basis; and WHEREAS, in consideration of the Board's adoption of this Resolution and the Board's support of a bill hereinafter 'described in Paragraph 1 to be introduced on behalf of the Petitioner at the 1987 Session of the General Assembly, the Petitioner has voluntarily agreed to pay each year a service fee in an amount equal to twenty percent (208) of the County of Roanoke real property tax levies, which would be applicable to the property of the Petitioner were the Petitioner not exempt from such taxation, for so long as the Petitioner's property is exempted from State and local taxation. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. The County supports a bill to be introduced at the 1987 Session of the General Assembly whereby Edinburgh Square Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization, seeks to be classified and designated a charitable and benevolent organization within the context of Section 6(a)(6) of Article X of the Constitution of Virginia, and whereby property owned by the Petitioner, which is used by it exclusively for charitable February 18, 1987 Virginia to classify and designate the propert Square as tax exempt pursuant to the provisioi Section 6 (a) (6) of the Constitution of Virginia Mr. Hodge stated that Edinburgh Square had previously requested tax exempt status on September 23, 1986 and was denied because of pending litigation with two similar entities. These suits have now been settled and it is possible to grant Edinburgh Square their request. Like the Richfield agencies, Edinburgh Square has agreed to pay sums in lieu of taxes of 208 of assessed'' value. Ed Natt, Attorney for the petitioners, asked for the Board's adoption of a resolution to the General Assembly requesting tax exempt status for Edinburgh Square. Persons speaking in support of the petition were Robert McNichols, Management Agent for Edinburgh Square, 5015 Williamson Road, Roanoke; Bruce Bloodworth, President of the League of Older Americans, 120 Trinkle Avenue, Roanoke; and Ruth Donaldson, 129 Hershburger Road, a resident of Edinburgh Square. Supervisor Brittle moved that the prepared resolution in support of tax exempt status for Edinburgh Square Foundation be approved. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Nickens. RESOLUTION 21887-3 TO THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY SUPPORTING TAX EXEMPTION OF PROPERTY OWNED BY EDINBURGH SQUARE FOUNDATION, INC. AND USED FOR CHARITABLE AND BENEVOLENT PURPOSES ON A NON-PROFIT BASIS, AND MEMORIALIZING A CERTAIN AGREEMENT BETWEEN EDINBURGH SQUARE FOUNDATION, INC. AND THE COUNTY WHEREAS, Edinburgh Square Foundation, Inc. (hereinafter the "Petitioner"), has petitioned this Board for support for a bill to be introduced at the 1987 Session of the General Assembly to exempt certain property of the Petitioner from taxation ~~, February 18, 1987 and benevolent purposes on a non-profit basis, shall be exemp from State and local taxation. 2. In consideration of the Board's adoption of thi Resolution and the Board's support of the bill described i Paragraph 1 of this Resolution to be introduced at the 198 Session of the General Assembly, the Petitioner agrees to pay t the County of Roanoke an annual service fee in an amount equal t twenty percent (20$) of the County of Roanoke real property to levies, which would be applicable to property of the Petitione in the County of Roanoke, were the Petitioner not exempt fro State and local taxation, for so long as the Petitioner i exempted from State and local taxation. 3. The Deputy Clerk is directed to forward an atteste copy of this Resolution to the Commissioner of the Revenue an the Treasurer for purposes of assessment and collection, respectively, of the service fee established by this Resolution, and to the Petitioner. On motion of Supervisor Brittle, seconded by Supervisor Nickens, and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES pro erty, valuation, calculations of service charge, exemptions therefrom appeals: Supervisor Johnson declared that sine there is no motion to remove this ordinance from the table, th ordinance will remain tabled until further notice. IN RE: EXECUTIVE SESSION L -/ February 18, 1987 L-~ At 9:30 a.m. Supervisor Johnson moved to go into ;xecutive Session pursuant to the Code of Virginia 2.1-344 (a) 1) to discuss personnel matters. The motion was seconded by supervisor Brittle and carried by a unanimous voice vote. CN RE: OPEN SESSION At 9:45 a.m. Supervisor Johnson moved to return to Open Session. The motion was seconded by Supervisor McGraw and carried by a unanimous voice vote. IN RE: WORK SESSIONS 1 410 Frontage Development Plan: Planner Jim Lehe presented the proposed draft of the development plans for Route 419. He stated that the Planning Commission had reviewed the ..plan and recommended it, and the the residents in the area had an opportunity to express their concerns. A public hearing on the matter will be heard on February 24, 1987. The Board members requested a brief, more concise report at that time. John Peters, Coordinator of Roads, also participated in the work session. IIIN RE: ADJOURNMENT Chairman Johnson adjourned the meeting at 11:15 a.m. Bob L. Johnson, Chairman February 24, 1987 ~` Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Roanoke County Administration Center 3738 Brambleton Avenue, SW Roanoke, Virginia 24018 February 24, 1987 The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors of Roan County, Virginia, met this day at the Roanoke Count Administration Center, this being the second Tuesday, and th second regularly scheduled meeting of the month of February 1987. IN RE: CALL TO ORDER Chairman Johnson called the meeting to order at 3:03 p.m. The roll call was taken. MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Bob L. Johnson, Vice Chairman Lee Garrett, Supervisors Alan H. Brittle, Steven A. McGraw MEMBERS ABSENT: Supervisor Harry C. Nickens STAFF PRESENT: Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator; Johr. M. Chambliss, Assistant Count Administrator for Management Services; Johr, R. Hubbard, Assistant County Administratoz of Public Facilities; Timothy W. Gubala, Assistant County Administrator for Economic Development; Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney, Janet Holt-Johnstone, Public Information Officer; Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk; Bonnie Newlon, Sesquicentennial Coordinator; Diane Hyatt, Director of Finance; Linda Lehe, Assistant County Administrator; Phillip Henry, Director of Engineering; Alfred Anderson, County Treasurer; D. Keith Cook, Director of Human Resources IN RE: OPENING CEREMONIES ~-i February 24, 1987 The invocation was given by John M. Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator. The Pledge of Allegiance was recited by all present. SIN RE: COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS Elmer C. Hodge announced that Mary H. Allen had been appointed Deputy Clerk to the Board of Supervisors. He also announced that Public Information Officer Janet Holt-Johnstone had resigned to move to Canada. IN RE: REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS The County Administrator requested the addition of Item E-5, Temporary Borrowing of $10 Million to cover casual deficits in the Revenues of the County. IN RE: NEW BUSINESS 1. Request for Funding for Sesquicentennial activities: The County Administrator introduced Bonnie Newlon who has been acting as Sesquicentennial Coordinator for the past year. Ms. Newlon presented an update on the activities of the Sesquicentennial and outlined the projects being undertaken by the various committees. Stephen Musselwhite, President of the Sesquicentennial Committee,Inc., was also present to answer questions. Mr. Musselwhite thanked Ms. Newlon for her assistance as coordinator. Director of Human Resources Keith Cook introduced the new Sesquicentennial Coordinator, Carol Giallianza who will assume her duties on March 4, 1987. L-I February 24, 1987 Supervisor Johnson moved the establishment and funding of the position of Sesquicentennial Coordinator. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Garrett and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Johnson NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens 2. Re4uest for Water and Sewer to Nichols Estates: Utilities Director Clifford Craig reported that nineteen property owners in the Nichols Estates Subdivision had signed a petition requesting that Roanoke County provide water and sewer service. The estimated cost to provide sanitary sewer is $80,000, and to provide water service is $55,000. Nine of the property owners were interested in water and eleven were interested in sewer, but only one property owner was willing to contribute money toward the construction of the facilities. At the present time, there are no funds available for construction of local utilities facilities, and staff recommends that sewer and water service to the Nichols Estates Subdivision be placed on the Capital Improvement Program list for prioriti2ation and funding when such funds are available. Supervisor Garrett moved the staff recommendation. The motion was seconded by Supervisor McGraw and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Johnson NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens 3. Re uest from Cox Cable Roanoke inc.for renewal of the Franchise Agreement: County Attorney Paul Mahoney stated that Cox Cable Roanoke Inc. has requested the renewal of the Cable TV franchise in a letter dated February 12, 1987. The present franchise expires December 31, 1990. According to the 'letter, the reason for requesting the renewal early is to justify L -I February 24, 1987 ontinued expenditures on capital items to maintain and upgrade he system. Bernard Langheim, Vice President and General Manager of ox Cable Roanoke Inc., was present to answer any questions the oard members might have. Supervisor Johnson moved that the proposed franchise greement be referred to the Regional Cable Television Committee or review and recommendation. The motion was seconded by upervisor Garrett and carried by the following recorded vote: YES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Johnson AYS: None BSENT: Supervisor Nickens 4. Request for approval to enter into well lot ption in the Hidden Valley section of Roanoke County: Phillip enry, Director of Engineering, reported that Geotechnics, Inc. ad located a potential well site on the property of R. William eid in the Hidden Valley section of Roanoke County. Mr. Reid as agreed to an option to purchase the property and a purchase rice of $5,000 if the test well is satisfactory. Funds are vailable from 1985 bond monies. Supervisor Garrett moved that the offer be accepted and 1, he County Administrator be authorized to execute the necessary ption agreement. The motion was seconded by Supervisor McGraw nd carried by the following recorded vote: YES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Johnson AYS: None BSENT: Supervisor Nickens 5. Temporary Borrowing of $10 Million to Cover asual Deficits in the Revenues of the County: County reasurer Alfred Anderson stated that the Board had previously dopted a resolution on February 10, 1987 authorizing the ssuance of the $10 Million in notes. Bids were received at 0:30 a.m. on February 24, 1987. Staff recommends that the L-~ February 24, 1987 prepared resolution accepting the bid of Central Fidelity Bank/Craigie, Inc. with an interest rate of 3.94 percent be adopted. Supervisor Brittle moved that the prepared resolution accepting the bid of Central Fidelity be adopted. The motion was seconded by Supervisor McGraw. Supervisor Garrett stated that he would abstain because of his wife's employment with Central Fidelity Bank. RESOLUTION 22487-1 AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE AND SALE OF THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA, REVENUE ANTICIPATION NOTES IN THE AMOUNT OF $10,000,000 WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors (the "Board") of the County of Roanoke, Virginia (the "County") adopted a Resolution on February 10, 1987, authorizing the issuance and sale of reve- nue anticipation notes in an amount not to exceed $10,000,000; and WHEREAS, the County has solicited bids from a limiter number of potential investors for the purchase of such notes; and WHEREAS, the Board now desires to specify the form an details of the notes and to award the Notes to the low bidder. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Super visors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia: 1. The Board of the County hereby determines that i is advisable to contract a debt and issue and sell the County' revenue anticipation notes (the "Notes") in an aggregate princi pal amount of $10,000,000. The issuance and sale of the note are hereby authorized. The proceeds from the sale of the Note shall be used to meet casual cash flow deficits of the County. 2. The Notes shall be issued in bearer form, withou privilege of registration and without coupons, in substantiall the form attached as Exhibit A. The Notes shall be date February 27, 1987, shall be issued in denominations of $25,00 shall be numbered N-1 and upward, sequentially, shall bea ~I interest at the rate of 3.942787$ per annum payable at maturit February 24, 1987 and shall mature on August 14, 1987. The Notes shall not be subject to payment or redemption before maturity. 3. The full faith and credit of the County are hereby pledged to the payment at maturity of the principal of and inter- est on the Notes. Unless other funds are lawfully available and' appropriated for the timely payment thereof, there shall be lev- ied, without limitation as to rate or amount, and collected in accordance with law, an annual ad valorem tax on all taxable pro- perty in the County subject to local taxation sufficient to pro- vide for payment of the principal of and interest on the Notes at maturity. 4. The County Administrator and Treasurer of the County are hereby authorized and directed to execute the Notes, ;and the Treasurer is hereby authorized to affix or imprint the seal of the County (or a facsimile thereof) on the Notes. The form of execution, imprinting of the seal and attestation may be' by facsimile; provided, however, if the signatures of the County Administrator and Treasurer are both by facsimile, the Notes shall not be valid until authenticated by the manual signature of the Paying Agent. In case any officer whose signature or a facsimile of whose signature shall appear on any Note shall cease to be such officer before the delivery of the Notes, such signature or such facsimile shall nevertheless be valid and sufficient for all purposes the same as if he or she had remained in office until such delivery. Any Note may bear the facsimile signature of or may be signed by such persons as at the actual time of the execution thereof shall be the proper officers to sign such Note although at the date of delivery of such Note such persons may not have been such officers. Upon receipt of payment therefor, the Treasurer of the County or such agent as may be designated, shall issue and deliver the Notes to the purchaser or purchasers thereof. The officers and agents of the County are hereby further authorized and directed to do all acts required by -- L ~~ February 24, 1987 the Notes and by this Resolution for the full, punctual and complete performance of all things necessary for this borrowing. 5. Sovran Bank, N.A. is appointed as Paying Agent for the Notes. The principal of and interest on the Notes shall be payable in lawful money of the United States upon surrender of~' the Notes on the maturity date at the principal corporate trust office of the Paying Agent in Richmond, Virginia. 6. Th•~ Distribution and use of the offering circular, dated February 24, 1987, in connection with the offering and sale of the Notes is ratified and approved. 7. The Board determines that it is in the best inter- est of the County and the Commonwealth of Virginia to accept the bid of Central Fidelity Bank/Craigie Inc. to purchase the Notes for a purchase price equal to the aggregate principal amount thereof. 8. The Board agrees on behalf of the County that the proceeds from the issuance and sale of the Notes will be invested and expended as set forth in the Non-Arbitrage Certificate of the County to be delivered at the time of the issuance and delivery of the Notes and that the County will comply with the covenants'. and representations contained therein. Further, the County shall comply with the reporting requirements of Section 149(e) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. 9. The officers and agents of the County are authoriz- ed and directed to take such further action as may be necessary or convenient in connection with the issuance, sale and delivery of the Notes and all actions previously taken by such officers and agents in connection therewith are ratified and confirmed. 10. The appropriate officers and agents of the County are authorized and directed to immediately cause a certified copy of this Resolution setting forth the form and details of the Notes and the Resolution adopted February 10, 1987, to be filed with the Circuit Court of the County pursuant to Sections 15.1- L-~ February 24, 1987 199 and 15.1-212 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended, and the notice required by Section 15.1-199 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended, to be published. 11. This Ordinance shall take effect immediately. On motion of Supervisor Brittle, seconded by Supervisor McGraw and the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Bra!--tle, McGraw, Johnson NAYS: None ABSTAIN: Supervisor Garrett ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens IN RE: REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS Chairman Johnson announced that the Joint Budget Workl Session with the School Board has been postponed. IN RE: APPOINTMENTS 1 Court Service Unit Advisory Council/Youth and Family Services: Supervisor Brittle directed the Deputy Clerk to find out if this committee is still active. 2. Leavue of Older Americans Advisory Council: Supervisor Brittle nominated Mr. Webb Johnson to another one-year term if Mr. Johnson is willing to serve. Mr. Webb's term expires March 31, 1987. 3. Transportation and Safety_Commission: Supervisor Brittle nominated the reappointment of the following: Captain Leonard J. Wade, Fred Altizer, Jr., H. Rodney Smith, Harry C. Nickens. Dr. Nickens term expires March 1, 1987. The other terms expire April 1, 1987. All new terms shall be four year terms. RE: REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS ~-I February 24, 1987 Supervisor Brittle: Asked about the status of the Board of Equalization. County Attorney Paul Mahoney stated that most of the issues have been resolved and all board members are now functioning. IN RE: CONSENT AGENDA Supervisor Brittle moved approval of the Consent Agenda.l The motion was seconded by Supervisor Garrett. RESOLUTION N0.22487-6 APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM J - CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That that certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for February 24, 1987, designated as Item J - Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 4, inclusive, as follows: 1. Minutes of Meeting - January 27, 1987 2. Acceptance of Water and Sewer lines in Woodbridge, Section 8. 3. Acceptance of Millwood Drive into the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System. 4. Request fo r a Raffle Permit from the Oak Grove Elementary School P.T.A. 2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this resolution. On motion of Supervisor Brittle, seconded by Supervisor Garrett, and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Johnson February 24, 1987 NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens RESOLUTION 22487-6.B REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF MILLWOOD DRIVE INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That this matter came this day to be heard upon the proceedings herein, and upon the application for Millwood Drive to be accepted and made a part of the Secondary System of State Highways under Section 33.1-229 of the Virginia State Code. 2. That it appears to the Board that drainage easements and a fifty (50> foot right-of-way for said road have heretofore been dedicated by virtue of a certain map known as revised Green Valley Estates, which map was recorded in Plat Book 9, Page 83, of the records of the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, on March 15, 1977, and that by reason of the recordation of said map no report from a Board ofl Viewers, nor consent or donation of right-of-way from the abutting property owners is necessary. The Board hereby guarantees said right-of-way for drainage. 3. That said road known as Millwood Drive and which is shown on a certain sketch accompanying this Resolution, be, a n d the same is hereby established as a public road to become a part of the State Secondary System of Highways in Roanoke County, only from and after notification of official acceptance of said street 'tor highway by the Virginia Department of Transportation. On motion of Supervisor Brittle, seconded by Supervisor Garrett, nd upon the following recorded vote: YES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson AYS: None BSENT: Supervisor Nickens L-I ~ s I February 24, 1987 ZN RE: REPORTS The following reports were received and filed: 1. Accounts Paid for January 1987. 2. Status Report on Starkey Park Wells 3. Board Contingency Fund IN RE: EXECUTIVE SESSION At 4:00 p.m. Supervisor Johnson moved to go into Executive Session pursuant to the Code of Virginia Section 2.1-344 (a) (2> and (6) to discuss the Red Lane Annexation litigation and the Iddings litigation. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Brittle and carried by a unanimous voice vote. _ IN RE: OPEN SESSION At 5:15 p.m. Supervisor Brittle moved to return to Open Session. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Garrett and carried by a unanimous voice vote. IN RE: RECESS At 5:20 p.m. Chairman Johnson declared a dinner recess. IN RE: EVENING SESSION Chairman Johnson called the meeting back to order at 7:05 p.m. IN RE: FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES L'I February 24, 1987 1 Ordinance acceptance an offer for and authorizing ance of an easement to Ap lachian Power Company: County Attorney Paul Mahoney reported that Appalachian Power has requested an easement from the County across the Stonebridge Park property for the purpose of running utility lines. The second reading of this ordinance is scheduled for March 10, 1987. Supervisor Brittle moved the first reading of the ordinance. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Garrett and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Johnson NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens IN RE: SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1 Ordinance authorizing the acquisition of easements, Starkey Force Main and Gravity Sewer: Mr. Mahoney announced that the first reading of this ordinance was held on February 10, 1987. There are approximately sixteen property owners involved, and the costs for this project shall be paid from the 1974 sewer bond proceeds. Supervisor Jeh-+cnn moved to approve the second reading of the ordinance. The motion was seconded by Supervisor McGraw. ORDINANCE 22487-7 AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION OF EASEMENTS, STARKEY FORCE MAIN AND GRAVITY SEWER PROJECT BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanok County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of §18.04 of th Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading concerning the acquisi tion of twenty-seven (27> easements for the Starkey Force Mai and Gravity Sewer Project was held on February 10, 1987. second reading on this matter was held on February 24, 1987. L-~ February 24, 1987 2. That these easements are for force main and gravit sewer lines in the Starkey area of the County. This project will provide necessary utility service to the citizens of Roanoke County. 3. That the County Administrator is authorized to exe cute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanok County as are necessary to accomplish the conveyance of said pro- perty, all of which shall be upon form approved by the Count Attorney. On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor McGraw, and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Johnson NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens easements, East 460 Water Line Project: Mr. Mahoney reporte that there are ten easements involving nine property owners. Th costs for this project shall be paid from the 1985 bond proceeds. The first reading of this ordinance was held on February 10, 1987. Supervisor McGraw moved to approve the second readin of the ordinance. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Brittle. ORDINANCE 22487-8 AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION OF EASEMENTS, EAST 460 WATER LINE PROJECT BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanok County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of §18.04 of th Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading concerning the acquisi tion of ten easements for the East 460 Water Line Project wa held on February 10, 1987. A second reading on this matter wa held on February 24, 1987. f I February 24, 1987 2. That these easements are for underground water lines for the East 460 Project. This project will provide neces- sary utility service to the citizens of Roanoke County. 3. That the County Administrator is authorized to exe- cute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County as are necessary to accomplish the conveyance of said pro- perty, all of which shall be upon form approved by the County Attorney. On motion of Supervisor McGraw, seconded by Supervisor Brittle, and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Johnson NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens IN RE: PUBLIC HEARINGS 87-3 Petition of JELCO CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Inc., to amend the existing conditions on the rear portion of the yroperty located north and east of Mick or Mack on Route 221 in the CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT (Held over from December 16, 1986 and January 27, 1987.) Chairman Johnson announced that the Rudy Cox, representing JELCO Construction Company, Inc., has requested that this petition be withdrawn. -4 Petition of SPRINGWOOD ASSOCIATES to amend the conditions on a 0.606 acre parcel to allow construction of a retail business, located adiacent to 3513 Brambleton Avenue in the WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT. (Held over from January 27, 1987) Assistant County Administrator Timothy Gubala presented he staff report. This petition was first heard in 1986 and the etitioners have built an import auto parts dealership. They are esiring to change the conditions that were proffered at that ime. He stated that the Planning Commission has recommended enial of the petition. L-I February 24, 1987 - _ __---___ ------~r-- Michael Smeltzer was present to represent Springwood Associates. He stated that the proffer they wish to amend would allow the construction of another building for retail use. Supervisor Garrett asked Mr. Smeltzer to define what Springwood Associates mean when they advertise major repairs. Mr. Smeltzer responded that at the time of the original rezoning, the principal repair work done on the property would be installation of automobile parts sold by Valley Import Auto Parts and agreed that no "major" repairs would be undertaken. At the time of the rezoning, major repairs had not been defined and they have been working with County staff to define major and minorll auto repairs. The areas of dispute are whether head gasket repair and replacement, and clutch repair and replacement are major or minor. Springwood Associates has decided to prepare a petition requesting a hearing before the Board of Zoning Appeals, and they would abide by their decision. Martha Faery, 3516 Pinevale Road S.W., spoke in opposition to this petition, stating that the conditions, proffered in December 1985 are not being met by Springwood Associates. Mr. Smeltzer and the owners, Doug and Bob Freeman responded to Mrs. Faery's concerns. Supervisor Garrett moved to table this petition until the Board of Zoning Appeals had heard Springwood Associates request to define major and minor automobile repairs. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Brittle and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Johnson NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens 1287-5 Petition of CHARLES A. MCCARTY AND CAROLYN H. MCCARTY requesting rezoning from M-1 to_ B-2 of February 24, 1987 Timothy Gubala presented the staff report, reporting that the petitioners would like to operate a retail hardware store in part of an existing building. The Planning Commission recommended approval with the proffered conditions. Neil McNally was present to represent the petitioners. No citizens were present to speak. Supervisor Johnson moved to approve the petition with proffered conditions. The motion was seconded by Supervisor NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDERED that a portion of thel orementioned parcel of land which is contained in the Roanoke County Tax Maps as Parcel 37 22 a (Old) 61.15-2-7 (New) and recorded in Deed Book 1248, page 313 and legally described below, be rezoned from M-1 District to B-2 District. BEGINNING at corner 1, an iron pin located along the southerly right-of-way line of Virginia Highway Route 24, a corner to the property of J. B. Sink; thence leaving Route 24 and running with said J. B. Sink property, S. 11 deg. 49' 37" E. 281.97 feet to corner 2, a point in the center of a 12 foot wide sanitary sewer easement; thence with a division line through the property of T. M. Bush Heirs, N. 85 deg. 17" 20" W. 269.74 feet along the aforesaid easement to corner 3; thence leaving said easement and with another new division line, N. 23 deg. 04' 37" W. 209.22 feet to corner 4, an iron pin located in the southerly right-of-way line of Route 24; thence with Route 24 in an easterly direction, containing 1.542 acres as more particularly shown on plat prepared by Buford T. Lumsden & Associates, P. C. Certified Land Surveyors, Roanoke, Virginia, dated October 23, 1981. BE IT FURTHER ORDERED That a copy of this r be transmitted to the Secretary of the Planning Fission and that he be directed to reflect that hange on the official zoning map of Roanoke County. PROFFER OF CONDITIONS: 1. The property be rezoned B-2 will only be for those uses permitted under B-2 designated as s 1 through 4. ~~ ~-1 February 24, 1987 2. The driveways will be treated and paved in the future. 3. One of the entrances to the subject property will be aligned with the cross-over from Route 24 and said entrance will not be obstructed by parking spaces. 4. The top of the McCarty's Hardware sign will be level with the top of the building with land ', elevation taken into consideration. ADOPTED on motion of Supervisor Johnson and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Johnson NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens 287-6 s . W. DEVELOPERS INC., r Mr. Gubala presented the staff report announcing that the Planning Commission had recommended approval of this petition. However, since the Planning Commission hearing, there is some interest in the property from an adjacent property owner. Heywood Fralin was present representing F & E Developers who own the adjoining tract. He stated that F & E Developers are requesting that the street not be closed until appropriate water and storm sewer facilities are installed and the easements for these are reserved. Maury Dessyn of D. W. Developers stated that they do not object to giving them an easement, but would like it piped sc that it does not destroy their two lots. Supervisor Johnson continued this hearing for thirty days so that staff may meet with the two developers. L-~ February 24, 1987 87-7 Petition of the VIRGINIA BAPTIST CHILDREN'S HOME requesting vacation of a 50 foot right of way known as 8th Street located on the west side of State Route 705 Mr. Gubala presented the staff report announcing that .here was no opposition. The Planning Commission has recommended pproval. No one was present to speak in opposition. Supervisor McGraw moved to approve the petition. 'he motion was seconded by Supervisor Johnson. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDERED that the 50 foot fight-of-way,hereinabove described and as shown on a plat ttached hereto, be permanently vacation and abandoned. BE IT FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this order be ransmitted to the Department of Development and that this order ~e recorded by petitioner along with the attached plat among the and records of Roanoke County. ADOPTED on motion of Supervisor McGraw and upon the ollowing recorded vote: YES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Johnson AYS: None BSENT: Supervisor Nickens 87-8 Petition of the Secretary to the Roanoke County Planning Commission to add the 419 Frontage Development Plan as an amendment to the Roanoke County Land Use Plan Mr. Gubala reported that the Supervisors had held a ork session concerning this, and prior to the work session, the lanning Commission held a public hearing and a series of ommunity meetings. The Planning Commission has recommended doption of the plan which provides guidelines to manage ', evelopment along the Route 419 corridor. Roy Lochner, a property owner on Route 419, questioned ow rezonings would be handled under this plan. Would parcels resently zoned for residential use be rezoned for commercial ses? -- i February 24, 1987 !, Chairman Johnson responded that this plan will be used i ', as a planning guide for future development, but there is enough ~ flexibility for changes in the future if they are needed. Supervisor Johnson moved adoption of the 419 Frontage Development Plan. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Brittle. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDERED that the aforementioned amendments be made. BE IT FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this order be transmitted to the Secretary of the Planning Commission and that he be directed to reflect these changes in the Roanoke County Land Use Plan. ADOPTED on motion of Supervisor Johnson and upon t following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, Johnson NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens ABSTAIN: Supervisor McGraw IN RE: CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS Mr. Anthony J. Hehn, 6006 Woodcock Circle S. W. spoke concerning the hiring of two additional directors with no reduction in the present salaries or personnel. He was concerned about the additional funding necessary for these positions. County Administrator Elmer C. Hodge responded that there would be no additional funds necessary for these positions. Funding will come from positions that are presently vacant or through retirement and resignations. Mr. Roy Lochner presented his interpretation of a summary of costs of Roanoke County from 1977 - 1986 as contained in the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the year ended June 30, 1986, and a summary of Roanoke County Revenues Vs. February 24, 1987 ~-i ITEM NUMBER ~'! '2" AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 10, 1987 SUBJECT: Confirmation of Committee Appointments COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The following nominations have been made and must now be confirmed by the Board of Supervisors. Lea clue of Older Americans Advisory Board Mr. Webb Johnson has been nominated by Supervisor Brittle to serve another one-year term. Mr. Johnson's term will expire March 31, 1988. Transportation and Safety Commission Supervisor Brittle has nominated the following to serve four-year terms: Captain Leonard J. Wade, representative from the Sheriff's Department; Fred Altizer, Jr., representative from the Va. Dept. of Transportation; H. Rodney Smith, senior citizens' representative; and Harry C. Nickens, representative from the Board of Supervisors. SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: ~'~~ Mary H. Allen Elmer C. Hodge Deputy Clerk County Administrator --------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved (+-Motion by: ~~-/~~~~~ Cahn ~i°~ No Yes Ab: Denied ( ) -' Brittle `~' Received ( ) Referred To ~ ~ ~~ /~ ~ ~ ~~ ~e-~ Garrett ~ Johnson ~ McGraw ~% Nickens _~ O~ AOANp,~.~ ~ •~ ~ Z 2 a 18 ~~ 88 SFSQUICENTENN\P'~' A Beauti~u/Beginning COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE C~nixnt~ of ~nttnvkr March 12, 1987 Dr. Harry C. Nickens 3084 Woodway Road S. E. Roanoke, Virginia 24014 Dear Dr. Nickens: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS BOB JOHNSON. CHAIRMAN HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT LEE GARRETT. VICE-CHAIRMAN WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT ALAN H. BRITTLE CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT STEVEN A. MCGRAW CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT The Board of Supervisors have asked me to express on their behalf their sincere appreciation for your previous service to the Transportation and Safety Council. Allow me to personally thank you for the time you served on this Board. Citizens so responsive to the needs of their community and willing to give of themselves and their time are indeed all too scarce. This is to advise that at their meeting held on March 10, 1987, the Board of Supervisors voted unanimously to reappoint you as a member of Transportation and Safety Commission for a four-year term. Your term will expire on April 1, 1991. State law provides that any person elected, re-elected, appointed to any body be furnished a copy of the Freedom of Information Act; your copy is enclosed. We are also sending you a copy of the Conflicts of Interest Act. Both of these have been amended by the 1984 Session of the Virginia General Assembly, and a copy of each amendment is attached. On behalf of the Supervisors and the citizens of Roanoke County, please accept our sincere thanks and appreciation for your willingness to accept this appointment. Very Bob L. Roanoke mha Enclosures k~, Chairman y Board of Supervisors CC: Captain Leonard Wade, Sheriff's Department P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24018-0798 (703) 772-2004 O~ POANp,~,~ ti 'w P Z z a ~8n.~ 88 sFSGU1CENTENN~P~ A Beautiful8eginning COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE C~nixn~~ n~ ~nttnnkr March 12, 1987 Mr. Webb Johnson 3929 Hummingbird Lane :>. W. Roanoke, Virginia 24018 Dear Mr. Johnson: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS BOB JOHNSON. CHAIRMAN HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT LEE GARRETT, VICE-CHAIRMAN WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT ALAN H. BRITTLE CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT STEVEN A. MCGRAW CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT The Board of Supervisors have asked me to express on their behalf their sincere appreciation for your previous service to the League of Older Americans Advisory Council. Allow me to personally thank you for the time you served on this Board. Citizens so responsive to the needs of their community and willing to give of themselves and their time are indeed all too scarce. This is to advise that at their meeting held on March 10, 1987 the Board of Supervisors voted unanimously to reappoint you as a member of League of Older Americans Advisory Council for another one-year term beginning April 1, 1987. Your term will expire on March 31, 1988. State law provides that any person elected, re-elected, appointed to any body be furnished a copy of the Freedom of Information Act; your copy is enclosed. We are also sending you a copy of the Conflicts of Interest Act. Both of these have been amended by the 1984 Session of the Virginia General Assembly, and a copy of each amendment is attached. On behalf of the Supervisors and the citizens of Roanoke County, please accept our sincere thanks and appreciation for your willingness to accept this appointment. Very truly yoyrs,~' it 4 %~ ' v Bob L. Johns , Chairman Roanoke Coun Board o.f:~~Sup~e'~>~itisors mha Enclosures CC: Executive Director League of -Older Americans 706 Campbell Avenue Roanoke, Virginia 24009 P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 2 4018-07 9 8 (703) 772-2004 O~ AOAN ,~.~ ti ~ A z a 18 ~~ 88 SFSQUICENTENN~P~ A Btauti~u(Bcginning COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE C~nun~~ of ~nttnnkP March 12, 1987 Mr. H. Rodney Smith Route 4, Box 465 Salem, Virginia 24153 Dear Mr . Smith BOARD OF SUPERVISORS BOB JOHNSON. CHAIRMAN HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT LEE GARRETT. VICE•CHAIRMAN WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT ALAN H. BRITTLE CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT STEVEN A. MCGRAW CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT The Board of Supervisors have asked me to express on their behalf their sincere appreciation for your previous service to the Transportation and Safety Council. Allow me to personally thank you for the time you served on this Board. Citizens so responsive to the needs of their community and willing to give of themselves and their time are indeed all too scarce. This is to advise that at their meeting held on March 10, 1987 the Board of Supervisors voted unanimously to reappoint you as a member of Transportation and Safety Commission for a four-year term. Your term will expire on April 1, 1991. State law provides that any person elected, re-elected, appointed to any body be furnished a copy of the Freedom of Information Act; your copy is enclosed. We are also sending you a copy of the Conflicts of Interest Act. Both of these have been amended by the 1984 Session of the Virginia General Assembly, and a copy of each amendment is attached. On behalf of the Supervisors and the citizens of Roanoke County, please accept our sincere thanks and appreciation for your willingness to accept this appointment. r' f Very;t~ul ~ y~}~~s, U ~~:~ Bob L. Johns , Chairman Roanoke County Board of Supervisors mha Enclosures CC: Captain Leonard Wade, Sheriff's Department P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24018-0798 (703> 772-2004 O~ POANp'~F a r, p z G~ a 18 ~~ 88 ~FSQUICENTENN~P~ A Beauri~u/Beginning COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE C~nixn~~ of ~nttnnke March 12, 1987 Mr. Fred Altizer, Jr. 3403 Ashmeade Drive S. W. Roanoke, Virginia 24018 Dear Mr. Altizer: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS BOB JOHNSON. CHAIRMAN HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT LEE GARRETT. VICE•CHAIRMAN WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT ALAN H. BRITTLE CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT STEVEN A. MCGRAW CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT The Board of Supervisors have asked me to express on their behalf their sincere appreciation for your previous service to the Transportation and Safety Council. Allow me to personally thank you for the time you served on this Board. Citizens so responsive to the needs of their community and willing to give of themselves and their time are indeed all too scarce. This is to advise that at their meeting held on March 10, 1987 the Board of Supervisors voted unanimously to reappoint you as a member of Transportation and Safety Commission for a four-year term. Your term will expire on April 1, 1991. State law provides that any person elected, re-elected, appointed to any body be furnished a copy of the Freedom of Information Act; your copy is enclosed. We are also sending you a copy of the Conflicts of Interest Act. Both of these have been amended by the 1984 Session of the Virginia General Assembly, and a copy of each amendment is attached. On behalf of the Supervisors and the citizens of Roanoke County, please accept our sincere thanks and appreciation for your willingness to accept this appointment. Very_.trul~ on),tfs, ~~~ ~ ~'` ~~'~ E Bob L. John , Chairman Roanoke Cou y Board of Sup~r.visors mha Enclosures CC: Captain Leonard Wade, Sheriff's Department P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24018-07 9 8 (703) 772-2004 O~ ROANp,`.~ ti ~ ~ Z ~ ~~ ~u~t~t~~~e ~~~~~ ,~ ~ 18 .~p5 88 SFSQUICENTENN~P~ March 12 , 19 8 7 A BeautifulBeginning COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE Captain Leonard J. Wade 4625 Roxbury Lane S. W. Roanoke, Virginia 24018 Dear Captain Wade: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS BOB JOHNSON. CHAIRMAN HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT LEE GARRETT. VICE•CHAIRMAN WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT ALAN H. BRITTLE CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT STEVEN A. MCGRAW CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT The Board of Supervisors have asked me to express on their behalf their sincere appreciation for your previous service to the Transportation and Safety Council. Allow me to personally thank you for the time you served on this Board. Citizens so responsive to the needs of their community and willing to give of themselves and their time are indeed all too scarce. This is to advise that at their meeting held on March 10, 1987 the Board of Supervisors voted unanimously to reappoint you as a member of Transportation and Safety Commission for a four-year term. Your term will expire on April 1, 1991. State law provides that any person elected, re-elected, appointed to any body be furnished a copy of the Freedom of Information Act; your copy is enclosed. We are also sending you a copy of the Conflicts of Interest Act. Both of these have been amended by the 1984 Session of the Virginia General Assembly, and a copy of each amendment is attached. On behalf of the Supervisors and the citizens of Roanoke County, please accept our sincere thanks and appreciation for your willingness to accept this appointment. Very truly y Bob L. John , Chairman Roanoke Coun Board of Supervisors mha Enclosures P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 2 4018-07 9 8 (703) 772-2004 ITEM NUMBER L.. ",~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 10, 1987 SUBJECT: Abandonment of Portions of the Old Chaparral Drive (Route 800) in Roanoke County. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: At the request of the adjacent property owner, the Virginia Department of Transportation has reviewed the possible abandonment of a small portion of the Old Route 800 in Roanoke County. Based on the favorable review, the VDOT has forwarded the request to Roanoke County for action by the Board of Supervisors pursuant to Section 33.1-155 of the State Code. Attached is a Resolution that would abandon 0.02 miles of the Old Chaparral Drive between the present Route 800 and Beacon Drive. With Board approval, this right of way will revert to the adjacent property owners. FISCAL IMPACT: No County funding is required. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board to approve the attached Resolution to Abandon 0.02 miles of the Old Chaparral Drive (Route 800) between the present road and Beacon Drive. 1 SUBMITTED BY: John'A. Pdters, III, P. E. Traffic and Road Coordinator Public Facilities Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by: ACTION APPROVED: ~G' Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator VOTE No Yes Abs Brittle Garrett Johnson McGraw Nickens L -.3 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 10, 1987 RESOLUTION REQUESTING THE ABANDONMENT OF 0.02 MILES OF PUBLIC ROADWAY BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: WHEREAS, Secondary Route 800, from the intersection of Route 687 to 0.619 miles south of the intersection of Route 687, a distance of 0.619 has been altered, and a new road has been constructed and approved by the State Highway Commissioner, which new road serves the same citizens as the road so altered; and WHEREAS, certain section of this new road follows new location, this being shown on the attached sketch titled, "Change in Secondary System Due to Relocation and Construction on Route 800, Project 0800-080-142,C501 dated at Salem, Virginia February 6, 1987. And further, that the section of old locations, i, e., Section No. 1, shown in red on the aforementioned sketch, a total distance of 0.02 miles, be, and the same hereby is, abandoned as a public road pursuant to Section 33.1-155 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended. 3 • ~ ~~ NORTH I S. ~ ` / ~ 157.28 2S~ ` ~~ ~ Blvd. • ~ rloz ` 21 0' o ~y~ ss / ~ a° 22 ~ ~ a s•'9 831 ~ - • R 23 e ' 372 ' /~ X / n IO - s.•y t~ F 25 ~ 24 ~ r /1 20 - 9 a 8 v ~z R-. r 29 2 2T b 26 . ~ ~~ ~/esa' ' N ly `?? . yy~ / izy•z ~ ae ~ fi ? l s! 1 ~ , ' 17.9 ~ 18 ~., ~ gal, a ~ e.14 ~~6 0 / ~' 12 / J p ,° 5 30 ' et 110 ?. 3e~ IS ',o '3~b ~ Pln~y Grwro e` et , ,Qd' .~ ro ~ ~ „y 3 / 2.81 Ac 5At CNislion CAureA 9 °e A 12 ~' / 35 y 1.84 Ac o ~ ~s 'L o a ~~ly o .. II • ~~ '°34 ~' s 14 6 ~Cp ~ a ~ ~ 6z. Ig ~~ B r~ '/ 1y~ aP a 36 m O~ a ,^ I.ISAc -,~ x .,,. /' s ? a 32 ^3M1 . // ~ ~ N / ~ s e o$~ r ~. ~ s v 6 ~ ~ :• ~ '' ~ c , '~ ~~ 18 R16 ti a s^ti ///o ^y 16 V `~~ ~ r~ ~ R o sl rzrs 5 •~~ 'v 38 s •, • ,. ~~ 30 a~, a ~•• O 4 :s Stonel • y 39 e / ,j~ y .o+ 4 y°' eo28 ~p s , n'1 :It ^° ~3~ ~ ~ ~ e ~ •~' , ~ 55 . n ~ a r s s / oe o tt ~ ~ \~o e•B e / z 54 • '~0 30 Igo! ,~~ \ i6 `( /y0 ~ ` a .+ ~ 2 • . i. ,? -° 27 `~s• ~ ~ ~ ^y ~ ~ $' S ~ R 51 , ~ ~r 0 26 x ~ oa ~ I ~~ - 43 f n 41 a yy y/..~ Sy ~ ~ ~ t. 21 o Londp 9 ~ z 2 1t ' e,• ~ ~ nderrY :s" a++, 6eoc $ e - 4 n 0r. Y ~, 20 ' $a Isl z I yO~ se go so ~ r. _ a $45$ es sg le u ~ 9 x s s s & m I $ 26 a 25 n gr / K r 5fl : . ;~ • ~ u„ ' 24 . - is S / r•3 I ~ 4 _ 2 R ~ r J AC BS /~ u O 6 11 ~1_ `,fie 1.65Ac - a ,w 42 / ` 2.64 Ac / 1 I 3.35Ac ~ g00 ~R~' i DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC FACILITIES 4 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 10, 1987 RESOLUTION 31087-3.B REQUESTING THE ABANDONMENT OF 0.02 MILES OF PUBLIC ROADWAY BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: WHEREAS, Secondary Route 800, from the intersection of Route 687 to 0.619 miles south of the intersection of Route 687, a distance of 0.619 has been altered, and a new road has been constructed and approved by the State Highway Commissioner, which new road serves the same citizens as the road so altered; and WHEREAS, certain section of this new road follows new location, this being shown on the attached sketch titled, "Change in Secondary System Due to Relocation and Construction on Route 800, Project 0800-080-142,C501 dated at Salem, Virginia February 6, 1987. And further, that the section of old locations, i, e., Section No. 1, shown in red on the aforementioned sketch, a total distance of 0.02 miles, be, and the same hereby is, abandoned as a public road pursuant to Section 33.1-155 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended. On motion of Supervisor Garrett, seconded by Supervisor Johnson, and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None A COPY - TESTE ~. t~ Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors 3/12/87 CC: File John A. Peters, Traffic and Roads Coordinator Department of Public Facilities 3_ -. '__1 O~ ROANp,~.~ Z ,F ,o ~ 18 rES~ 88 SFSQUICENTENN~P~ ABeaulifulBtginninp, BOARD OF SUPERVISORS BOB JOHNSON. CHAIRMAN HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT LEE GARRETT. VICE•CHAIRMAN COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR WIN DSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT ELMER C. HODGE ALAN H. BRITTLE CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT March 12, 1987 STEVEN A. MCGRAW CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT Mr . Rick Burke 3307 Longhorn Road Roanoke, Virginia 24018 Dear Mr. Burke: At their regular meeting on March 10, 1987 the County Board of Supervisors unanimously approved the request of the Botetourt Jaycees for a permit for a Raffle The fee has been paid. You may consider this letter to be your permit, and I suggest it be displayed on the premises where the Raffle is to be conducted. The State Code provides that raffle and bingo permits be issued on a calendar-year basis; therefore, the permit will expire December 31, 1987. This permit, however, is only valid for the dates specified on your application. If I may be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me at 772-2004. V Bob L. John n, Chairman Roanoke Cou ty Board of Supervisors mha CC: Commissioner of the Revenue Fiscal Management Commonwealth Attorney County Treasurer P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 2 4018-07 9 8 (703) 772-2004 ITEM NUMBER L'~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 10, 1987 SUBJECT: Request for a Raffle Permit from the Botetourt Jaycees COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Botetourt Jaycees have requested a Raffle Permit. This application has been reviewed by the Commissioner of Revenue and he recommends that it be approved. While this organization is from Botetourt County, both their meetings and the raffle are held in Roanoke County. The organization has paid the $25.00 fee SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: ~ ~~'~ Mary H. Allen Elmer C. Hodge Deputy Clerk County Administrator --------------------------------------------------------- ACT ON VOTE Approved (mil" Motion by : ~a-r' ~'~~-~ No Ye~ Abs Denied ( ) ~~h /~S o ~ Brittle Received ( ) Garrett ~ _ Referred Johnson ~ _ To McGraw ~ _ Nickens / _ cc. ~~~~ ~g ~-~ /e ~e-m ~ ~ s COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA COMMISSIONER OF THE REVENUE L -'~ O~ ROANO~F' ~• ti ,p a= 1838 APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO CONDUCT RAFFLES OR BINGO Application is hereby made for a bingo game or raffle permit. This application is made subject to all County and State laws, ordinances, rules, and regulations now in force, or that may be enacted hereafter and which are hereby agreed to by the under- signed applicant and which shall be deemed a condition under which this permit is issued. All applicants should exercise extreme care to ensure the accura- cy of their responses to the following questions. Bingo games and raffles are strictly regulated by Title 18.2-340.1 et. seg. of the criminal statutes of the Virginia Code, and by Section 4-86 et. seg. of the Roanoke County Code. These laws authorize the County Board of Supervisors to conduct a reasonable investiga- tion prior to granting a bingo or raffle permit. The Board has sixty days from the filing of an application to grant or deny the permit. The Board may deny, suspend, or revoke the permit of any organization found not to be in strict compliance with county and state law. Any person violating county or state regulations concerning these permits shall be guilty of a Class 1 misdemeanor. Any person who uses any part of the gross receipts from bingo or raffles for any purpose other than the lawful religious, charitable, community, or educational purposes for which the organization is specifi- cally organized, except for reasonable operating expenses, shall be guilty of a Class 6 felony. THIS APPLICATION IS FOR: (check one) RAFFLE PERMIT ./ BINGO GAMES Name of Organi Street Address Mailing Address ~j;4~~ City, State, Zip Code ~~~ ~,~y,/~ , 'Z ~} ~j?3 3 Purpose and Type of Organization ~h( ~(Z~,~-,-}~ - ~~; /~[~_ - When was the organization founded? ~~%( (G ~ 1 L -~ Roanoke County meeting place? ~C~~f~~(~i~} Fa;~ 1'V~~~~An'~~bnJ ~~ Has organization been in existence in Roanoke County for two con- tinuous years? YES~_ NO Is the organization non-profit? YES~_ NO Indicate Federal Identification Number # ~3 ~ ~~~ 9y~ ,~ Attach copy of IRS Tax Exemption letter. Officers of the Organization: President: -~ i` Address : ~~~ ~~ •-rr ^' sl ~"~Y~I i J~ ~~~ ~c~. ~~,~. '~~l~i Secretary: ,~- `~u~;,~tikl~_ Address: ~, ~~ ./ 1~. ~, ~tev; ale ~`a a~to~3 Vice-President ~ j ~ yy~ ~~~ {Z~~~_ Address : c~~o2J ~-'~ t~. ~s'SAa'~ 2 ~o~~(Cr' y/-~ a~~f~ Treasurer:~~~ ~,~,~ y.~~~~~ Address:~f~ ~oX 56Cv 1~ ~~IcUti~l~. U r~ ~~c~~3 Member authorized to be responsible for Raffle or Bingo opera- ~• tions: Name ~ i e ~_- ~ a ~~<~ - Home Address 334 7 ~,oNG ~oR+J `~~ ' `~c •" fl Phone ~ ~a, ~~ ~ GBus . Phone 7 ~ O ~ ~ v A COMPLETE LIST OF THE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF CURRENT MEMBER- SHIP MUST BE FURNISHED WITH THIS APPLICATION. Specific location where Raffle or Bingo Game is to be conducted. RAFFLES : Date of Drawing ~ - ~~ - }~''~ Time of Drawing (o ~ "3~ - i ~," ~, Q BINGO: Days of Week & Hours of Activity: Sunday From To Monday From To Tuesday From To Wednesday From To Thursday From To Friday From To Saturday From_ Tom u 2 ~-"~{ State specifically how the proceeds from the Bingo/Raffle will be used. List in detail the use of the planned or intended use of the proceeds. Use estimated amounts if necessary. ~j0~ ~ L ~ ~s~o. ~ o C:~ p F' ~ ~2.oF ~ T- / J - I' J d©o ~ Cam' ~• ~`, f ~ ~ ~ / S 7`'m 4 S ~C.~ ~'~ 3 -- (J N~~ ~-/° ''Z- ~.v /~c..~y ~- ~- G ti I /c.Q ~2eiv~ N u m b~~r NcJ. ~aD ~ ~„e_S e N~"s ~ ~' o o ~ 1 cSZ ~. i r•~ ~c s . ~-f-~c. . '. ~bo~. ~c~5 ~T's ~'O r2 ~-G•. vv~ i ~ i e S - ~ o o .b c~,s Kul'. f ' f°2o ~,,~, ~o ~e ~ u~. 7L l~ 0. ~ /~'D12 h ~'~ l ~5~1,po ~ ~i-NI v/25 ~bu~o-.I2.crS s -.' ~-y BINGO: Complete the following: Legal owner(s) of the building where BINGO is to be conducted: Name: Address: County_ State Zip Is the building owned by a 501-C non-profit organization? Seating capacity for each location: Parking spaces for each location: ALL RAFFLE AND BINGO APPLICANTS MUST ANSWER QUESTIONS 1 - 19 1. Gross receipts from all sources related to the operation of Bingo games or Instant Bingo by calendar quarter for prior calen- dar year period. BINGO INSTANT BINGO 1st Quarter 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter Total lst Quarter 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter Total 2. Does your organization understand that it~is a violation of law to enter into a contract with any person or firm, associa- tion, organization, partnership, or corporation of any classifica- tion whatsoever, for the purpose of organizing, managing, or con- ducting Bingo Games or Raffles?~~ S 3. Does your organization understand that it must maintain and file complete records of receipts and disbursements pertaining. to Bingo games and Raffles, and that such records are subject to audit by the Commissioner of the Revenue? /~ ~ 4. Does your organization understand that the Commissioner of the Revenue or his designee has the right to go upon the premises on which any organization is conducting a Bingo game or raffle, to perform unannounced audits, and to secure for audit all re- cords C quired to be maintained for Bingo games or raffles? 3 ~-y 5. Does your organization understand that a Financial Report must be filed with the Commissioner of the Revenue on or before the first day of November of each calendar year for which a per- mit has been issued? E,S 6. Does your organization understand that if gross receipts ex- ceed fifty thousand dollars during any calendar quarter, an addi- tional Financial Report must be filed for such quarter no later than sixty days following the last day of such quarter? ~ S 7. Does your organization understand that the failure to file financial reports when due shall cause automatic revocation of the permit, and no such organization shall conduct any Bingo game or raffle thereafter until such report is properly filed and a new permit is obtained? ~/~ 8. Does your organization understand that each Financial Report must be accompanied by a Certificate, verified-under oath by the Board of Directors, that the proceeds of any Bingo game or raffle have been used for these lawful, religious, charitable, commu- nity, or educational purposes for which the organization is spe- cifically chartered or organized, and that the operation of Bingo games or raffles have been in accordance with the provisions of Article 1.1 of Chapter 8, Title 18.2 of the Code of Virginia?~ 9. Does your organization understand that a one percent audit fee of the gross receipts must be paid to the County of Roanoke upon submission of the annual financial report due on or before the first of November? ~.S 10. Does your organization understand that this permit is valid only in the County of Roanoke and only at such locations, and for such dates, as are designated in the permit application? CS 11. Does your organization understand that no person, except a bona fide member of any such organization who shall have been a member of such organization for at least ninety days prior to such participation, shall participate in the management, opera- tion, or conduct of any bingo game or raffle, and no person shall receive any remuneration for participating in management, operation, or conduct of any such game or raffle? ~ ~ S 12. Has your organization attached a check for the annual permit fee in the amount of $25.00 payable to the County of Roanoke, Virginia? ~ C 13. Does your organization understand that any organization found in violation of the County Bingo and Raffle Ordinance or X18.2- 340.10 of the Code of Virginia authorizing this permit is subject to having such permit revoked and any person, shareholder, agent, member or employee of such organization who violates the above to having such permit revoked and any person, shareholder, agent, member or employee of such organization who violates the above referenced Codes may be guilty of a felony? L E-_..5 4 ~- "~ 14. Has your organization attached a complete list of its member- ship to this application form? ~ ~ 15. Has your organization attached a copy of its bylaws to this application form? ~/~S 16. Has the organization been declared exempt from ~~r erty taxa- tion under the Virginia Constitution or statutes? ro ert If yes, state whether exemption is for real, perso al p p Y- or both and identify exempt property. 17. State the specific, type and purpose of the organization. ~ ~ ~~, ~ ~ - n /~ n~' .'f-' C ~ U ~ _~. 1 eA~' ~'S~1 y~? 1 2 A~ iv ~ N ~ C9-~C9-~4~y ~ L A-fi ~ 18. Is this organization incorporated in Virginia? G~-S If yes, me and address of Registered Agent: 1 1 _U`~] 19. Is the organization registered with the Virginia Department ~~ of Agriculture and Consumer Affairs pursuant to the C11~~ ritable Solicitations Act, Section 57-48 of the Virginia Code? /V~ (If so, attach copy of registration.) Has the organization been granted an exemption from registration by the Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Affairs? (If so, attach copy of exemption.) ALL RAFFLE APPLICANTS DESCRIBE THE ARTICLES TO BE RAFFLED, VALUE OF SUCH ARTICLES, AND PROCEED TO NOTARIZATION. Article Description \ q ~7 C ~~- ~~ ~ ~- tau ~ ~ ~-~I; I I~. P Fair Market Value 1g~gs~ 5 ~ -~ 26. Does your organization understand that a Certificate of Occu- pancy must be obtained or be on file which authorizes this use at the proposed location? 27. Does your organization understand that awards or prize money or merchandise valued in excess of the following amounts are illegal? a. No door prize shall exceed twenty-five dollars. b. No regular Bingo or special Bingo game shall exceed One Hund- red dollars. c. No jackpot of any nature whatsoever shall exceed One Thousand Dollars, nor shall the total amount of jackpot prizes awarded in any one calendar day exceed One Thousand Dollars. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * NOTARIZATION: TAE FOLLOWING OATH MUST BE TAKEN BY ALL APPLICANTS I hereby swear or affirm under the penalties of perjury as set forth in X18.2 of the Code of Virginia, that all of the above • statements are true to the best of my knowledge, information, and beliefs. All questions have been answered. Signed by: Name ~~~ Title La~U'~hc~/2~%' ~ ,~~- G~~ l ~vi~ Home Address Subscribed and sworn before me, this ~ ~ day of ~~~J~~ .>~-~~ 19 ~~ l My commission expires: / ~ ~ 19 ~`i -s.._c_~- r <t_-~ c~ -2~- otary Public RETURN THIS COMPLETED APPLICATION T0: COMMISSIONER OF THE REVENUE P.O. Box 3900 Roanoke, VA 24015 7 L ~~ NOT VALID UNLESS COUNTERSIGNED The above application, having been found in due form, is approved and issued to the applicant to have effect until December 31st of this calendar year. .3- 3 - ~ '~ Date The above application is not appro Date 8 Commissioner of the Revenue N-I COUI~Pi'Y OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA RESERVE FOR BOARD CONTINGENCY Original Budget 7-1-86 November 26, 1986 Health Insurance Coverage December 16, 1986 December 16, 1986 January 13, 1987 January 13, 1987 February 10, 1987 February 24, 1987 for Retired County Employees Planning Commission Travel Board of Equalization Board of Supervisors and Management Staff Planning/ Goal Setting Work Session Volunteers Training Seminar Roanoke Valley Constitution's Bicentennial Commission Sesquicentennial Balance of Board Contingency at February 24, 1987 Suhnitted by, Diane D. Hyat Director of Finance $129,000 (6,300) (2,046) (4,000) (6,500) (2,500) (500) (10,000) 97 154 N - ~- COUNTY OF ROANOKE STATEMENT OF EXPENDITURES MONTH ENDED JANUARY 31, 1987 GENERAL ADMINISTRATION BORRD OF SUPERVISORS COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR PERSONNEL COUNTY ATTORNEY COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE TRERSURER ELECTIONS FISCAL MANAGEMENT ------------------ SUPERINTENDENT OF FISCAL MANAGEMENT COUNTY ASSF_SSOR CENTRAL ACCOUNTING PROCUREMENT MANAGEMENT & BUDGET BUDGET ------------ EXPENDED ------------ - % ----------- $ 100,611 ~ 59,53x' S9 269,541 160,217 59 186,295 110,810 59 126,308 63,254 50 439,698 254,221 58 407,739 195,203 48 120,914 71,363 59 97,499 40,550 42 544,559 278,979 5i 333,739 191,953 58 194,778 109,991 56 64,883 25,771 40 JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION CIRCUIT COURT GEPIERAL DISTRICT COURT MAGISTRATES J $ D DISTRICT COURT CLERK OF CIRCUIT COURT COMfIONWEAITH'S ATTORNEY PRORATION OFFICE 91,801 7,537 8 21,145 5,233 25 730 320 44 6,546 3,653 56 446,823 221,747 50 276,952 154,423 56 33,825 20,335 60 PUBLIC SAFETY POLICING & INVESTIGATING HIGHWAY SAFETY COMMISSION FIRE RESCUE SQUAD EMERGF_NCY SERVICES CONFINEMENT/CARE OF PRI50NERS ANIMAL CONTROL 3,515,555 1,869,033 53 960 47 5 1,724,787 903,364 52 467,688 266,771 57 36,958 22,875 62 1,786,970 1,015,772 57 149,759 86,615 58 PUBLIC FACILITIES SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC FACILITIES STREET LIGHTS ENGINEERING BUILDINGS & GROUNDS PARKS & RECREATION DF'AINAGE " REFUSE PARK DEVELOPMENT PUBIir, TRANSPDRTATION 221,795 98,345 44 110,845 50,842 45 214,377 86,047 40 1,441,490 691,774 48 992,701 444,476 45 175,079 +0,825 23 1,360,433 636,668 47 8,833 30,660 347 169,796 51,084 30 Nf~- COUNTY OF RDANOKE STATEMENT OF EXPENDITUkES MONTH ENDED JANUAkY 31, 1987 HEALTH & SOCIAL SERVICES --------------------------- PUBLIC HEALTH SOCIAL SERUICES ADMINISTkATION PUBLIC ASSISTANCE INSTITUTIONAL CARE SOCIAL SERVICE ORGAIZATIONS DEVELOPMENT ------------------ SUPEfiINTENDENT OF DEVELOPMENT PLANNING 8 ZONING ECONOF~IC DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT kEVIEW PLANNING COMMISSION CONSTkUCTION BUILDING SERVICES FLOOD DI5ASTEk EXPENSE NON-DEPARTMENTAL ------------------ LIBkAkY EXTENSION b CONTINUING EDUCATION EMPLOYEE BENEFITS INSUkANCE COtdTkIBUTI0N5 TD SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS MISCELIANEDUS 359,693 179,847 50 1,689,870 1,026,498 61 893,986 387,016 43 51,500 6,017 12 94,984 64,988 68 100,096 61,528 61 240,654 128,851 54 88,497 57,668 65 98,684 54,682 55 19,581 11,543 59 196,911 114,750 56 0 12,973 1,008,412 573,181 57 89,700 21,304 24 414,762 55,957 13 539,915 626,423 116 24,600 24,600 100 770,452 254,792 33 TOTAL TRANSFERS ------------------ kEIMRUkSABLE EXPENDITURES DEBT SERVICE TkRNSFEk TO INTEfiNAL SERVICE TkANSFEk TO SCHOOL OPEkATING FUND TRANSFEk TO UTILITY CAPITAL CAPITAL PkOJECTS T(tANSFEk kESEkVE FOk BOAkD CONTINGENCY UNAPF'kOPRIATED BALANCE TRANSFEk TO YOUTH HRVEN TOTAL TRANSFEk ITEMS GRAND TOTAL. 22,824,769 11,928,908 52 0 2, 2oa 2,074,544 2,028,912 98 143,270 0 0 24,994,710 6,035,508 24 315,195 0 2,483,198 0 0 113,954 0 0 500,000 0 0 96,356 ------------ 0 ----- - 30,721,227 ------------ --- --- --- 8,066,620 ------------ --- --------- 26 --------- f 53,545,996 ~ 19,995,528 37 ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------- IV'/ 9 n a 0 z .vY. b A N 0 0 d A Iair n .S 2 'V -1 21 -y 2 T O H C -i A7 ["l 9 JO ["') [A ti O N b r? a 'CJC V1 A -~ - C S 1 C a .~C m m '7 tl C9 CJ - O W m 2 9 H +'O O r -'-1 r A G) fA r S O f X r9 [') a r 2 _T. H G') S --11 fA a 2 C7 S l~U f~l 3 m O S t 1 -1 r'l V O m tl Vl ..~.. 3 1 1 0 m .'[l T Si S O "J G A N [TI) ~ h GS9 D A b M~~ [mi] ~ fl'l A C .~ a a M~ "9 m T x A N Z d a [l'i ~» a . T m K m A m !.C'1 A U'I l~ TI.. R£.' O .R1 [A Sie a J T n r m VY -~ T1 'O A A m y m ~ m z r~*~ c r crl o r-~ [r+ a a m m a -< o o~ - s n a tl c-l ~ ua a ea ~*1 a e7 m a _ x 0 x m c o -~ 7~ 3. ~+- r -1 0 [rl .y r rn x> cril r m un m .rte ii [n m cn n :o m m [n r o m nooa o rii s-' z~ s cr°'l cnO~-~~~ m -~inumi ` n.cm n mcn ~~ m-n r v'l -~r y rl:+u a>:= o z m o .c.. o h m cmrl m v~ m m a m 'O .± m ti i - m v c ~ r ~ -1 c-l n _ ul 'n +°J c I 11~~-l o c(~ ~ a Ul fit . -1 s --~ m ~~ m ~ r cm~ Z m r++ cn m T TJ S -3 [9 - b C m m f~ ti C~ ^' ° v o rl c cn a m [n m _ D Sn N rv> U ~' m rn m ~ m m '~ x '~ m ~ o In ~ ~ m m ~'+ d In w N I t EI ~ E~ y .d V 1 .~ ' r ~~ N v N W' ~'~ j 9tl 1 0 1 O I.l t!1 1 O W [J ..M IYi O+ rl> UI W O vv O UI 1 C 11 CJ I W H Q' .D 1 W~ V O' V fU Cll 00 U Gn .} OCO VI Itl W N V Ln N N 60 1 b II Ln ~ ~D ~ O W ~ O N~ u ,V O O H O rU [.ll ~` W O ~n +J yn Ln O Gn !V U 1 m 11 11 ~~ 1 O ~D .OG 1 Os N VI OO [.l 0 0 "~ UI O O O Ln W O 0 0 ~` ~4 O O C!1 0 0 1 '-1 O~ v U 0 T O O O O O O S O O 6 0 1 li [°ail i ooom v ~ [*~•amW<:no o0~^v-~o 000000000000 ~ it 1 1 M M I II A l m T 1 ~+ N ~ ~ W rp,V ~ 1 N O. 11 It E W .4N ~ W .A .! ONO r~ Y r/ O N •a~1 r ~ A N N W O [+m+ O Ln .P r<7 1 O O l"1 11 tit I ~O ~+ .D t r O+ .L~ .D O. W r . V ~ n W fU r+ VI Co .O Nt O O .D rU W O N .D 1 y 10 9 1 tl Cn I O W 1 ~ y N O W p J W V~ W OO ~+ O+ Y~ V [Jf N T N O J. N~ W' N O. 1~ 11 Ln 1 O Ch •D 1 GP fV rU O U VO [^ N V W O N CT ii O ~ 0 0 0 IX+ i V ~D ~^ N Cn V .f., N Ill N V ~^ O S. O rD ~D [n V O V .f.~ W O+ i M II V E V 1~ ~+ ~ ~ O 1/ V r 1~ ~ 1 ~ 1 W D. O r O+ O~ ~ O ~D .N4 O O+ .O GNU [JI OW+ ~ ~ N A 1 O r ~ 11 ~ i NCO ~ N OO O. A O N , V `+ O+ Vi O+ N tU N O+ W O ~ (JI GI _ -0~ [/1 ~ i ~ IN 11 A I .!^ ~ A ~ UI d T A Q. •iD VAR W A V a O r W .LAn- W V N~ W V 1 ~V..l M Ln E 0 0 O IJI ; O O Oa G V O Ln O O Ql 0 •D .P O? V IV N A P [^ N V E II .ND 1 O O O OO 10 0 0 m b tom" [JI ti A~ w A V ,A ~ W~ fU.t O V O+ y r~ til ~ II I 1 1E1E W 1 r W b ~ ~ N N N W T .D ti t 11 O+ ~ O W N N W ~+ OO r .O r N J` N W .O W aD O UI O+ 1 C E1E AW 1 O V O 1 O 6 ~pW O M[~JI ~VNI N O W O ~V ~~ I yLll ~ O N O O O O N W O ~ E m t~ O~ j O CA O ~ O O O O V 0 0 0 0 .O'er. 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 IU 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 ~ W I O O W N I O O O V O ['O 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0; 1 II 1 E ri ~o i u ~ ~= n i ~ i a u w o Savo aH y l II M 1 O+ I N V ~ 11 iD II u~ 1 ~.O O O O. [JI Ln O O ~D V .D OO OO Rl V1 V ~O a v 1 O I 11 N VI 1 O •D W 1V O+ W W ~D .D V .D O+ ~. ~ W F~ 1'O V O VI ~O O ~ 1 H ~b TCJ I 1 1 1 U P+ N C O W N A V M W GI V ru J C. U ~D D +D 1 S V r I jl m j ~ ~ rMJi O W N - O .D OO W O u] L OO OO O LP i CO W UI ~ O IV 1 V iE U j O O O [11 ~ O W O [JI W IV Al O O+ rn W A N O V W V V N nl M ~] V ~ M i{ ~ E o0 o i o~ o~ocnw~~I"°I~~nm~o m~.°•m~l'IwmF°ilmc^Oi1 ru .U~- ~ x II M 11 WA[.1 E .~ •~ ~ ~ W(.l ..~ ~ IV N W ~ 6+ fNil 1 T D 2 II 11 N I GO'+ ~ W 1 O V V [ll V m N~ N A~~ O Wpa O+ N N r Cn Q W W ~~ 4 E O V a I I~ +` 1 O ~ G i O O Ln OO ~+ 6 y ru ..• y y T O .++ Rl r M [D R+ ~ n O N E OO / .In i H O '-. 11 ' o.o. v o0~ .r.. ... ~ N e+.o,aoo m~ vY o..-~o+W ~.-. ^ ~l 1 x z m '. 11 ~ o Ln W o o .c w b m [[.°n ru Y v. r~r o m. 1 ~ 1~ O; O O OO N ~ 0 0 U1 4 W ~' O W E Ln A O O 1-' O V !V UI O ~ V [n ~ K ; b IK l1: ~K iR lk W. nc >p ~ M M 11 '1 E 1 ' C ,,1 1 bo A D ;! m ~ ~ ~ O CVII O Oe [WJI W tU ~ f~V~ tb d OO OO V ~ T W ~ [JI O v [m!1 VI OOO A ~ Gl C a E~ v E O O V; 0 0~ ^N`I 'UPI h UO w01 [N.Y Cn ~ r O O~ G ~I N (UvA O aNil m W m~ rll E ti A m m 2 n r n o 3 n m m a -tlI+ v ~ .c -+ r o ~-+ < 37 2 c1) 2 ~G tl ~ti O m ~ m m o m T 1 v ~J 0 f~l H U Ul ' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF TffE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OFTROANOREER COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT TfiE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 10, 1987 SUBJECT: YOUTH HAVEN I I Project status Report COUN'PY ADMINISTRATOR' S COMMEN`1.'S : SUMMARY OF ZNFORMA TION: f3ui Iding: The shunt trip breaker and automatic on/off fan were installed on our range on February 10 and February 20, 1987 respectively. We have finally passed fire inspection and were issued a permanent Certificate of Occupancy on February 26, 1987. Because our opening was delayed by problems with sub- contractors comp-eting required work on the fire suppression system, liquidated damages of $150 a day against the contractor were initiated effective February 11 through February 24, 1987. Our first resident arrived on February 27, 1987. We are expecting our second resident on March 2, 1987. A third admission is in process. Originally, we had planned to accept only four residents initially, go to six in June and to full census (12) by February, 1988. This plan was based on the recommendation of Mr. Leaman, Regional Manager of the Department of Corrections. However, since some concerns have been expressed over this utilization rate, we are amenable to beginning with six residents through June and then building to full census by February, 1988 if so desired. Mr. Leaman is also agreeable with the latter plan. This month we received a check in the amount of $1,930.00 from Roanoke City to cover the cost of their share of the kitchen pop-out. Program Development and Administration: During the past month, a system for transporting Y~UTH HAVEN II essential personnel during inclement weather was developed and implemented with Fire and Emergency Services. Medicaid coverage for our residents has been worked through at the state and local levels. Policies and procedures for staff to follow, in obtaining Medicaid for residents, have been written and implemented. Initial steps toward becoming a Title XX vendor have been taken. According to informed sources, this process usually takes six to nine months to complete. A March 4, 1987 meeting in Martinsville is scheduled to discuss the application process with Curtis Nolen, Anchor Group Homes. Mr. Nolen is the recognized local expert on Title XX. Ms. Hyatt, Mr. Jack Treni- and I will ati-end. ~~ raj .. ..7YYf The Joint Placement Contract for YOUTH HAVEN II and Youth Haven I was ~ r-~ le~l.~lly executed and signed by Roanoke ~ity this month and forwarded on to S I ~ Aft a ~,rn. er execution by Sa I ern, the contract w i I I be sent to Roanoke County for final execution. Procedures for collecting parental support towards placement costs of y Y(}~l1TH HAVEN II have been finalized with Roanoke County Department of Social SF_~rvices and Roanoke County/Salem Court Service Unit. Parental support c~,ntributions will be based on the sliding scale used by Roanoke County Department of Social Services and Roanoke County/Salem Court Service Unit for this purpose. Funds collected wilt be>, returned to the County General Fund to offset Roanoke County's local cosh; of operating Y~UTH HAVEN II. Puhlic Relations: Our fourth edition of our newsletter will be mailed by March 4, 1987 to approximately 1,600 people. This month, Ms. Waldo attended meetings with Jim Ritchie; the Juvenile and Domestic Relations Court Judges and Court Service Unit Directors; the Roanoke Coalition on Youth Substance Abuse; the Salvation Army E3attered Women's Shelter; aril a conference in Charlottesville on "Female Runaways in Group Homes." Mr. Metz attended the Roanoke Valley Psychiatric Center's Drug Task Force meeting. Personnel: Our cook, Ms. Mabel Allen, came on board on February 12, 1987 as a full- time temporary employee. The cook's position had been advertised two times previously as a half-time position. We had received a poor response to the half-time ads. After consultation with the Cepartment of Human Resources and the Department of Corrections, we decided to proceed to advertise the position as full-time temporary. We had sufficient funds in this year's budget to cover this salary and the Department of Corrections was giving us encoura<_3ement to seek U.S.D.A. funds for this position beginning July 1, 1987. What we would like to do is make this position full-time permanent, beginning July 1, 1987, if we receive final approval from Roanoke County and the Department of Corrections. The funding would break down as follows: 3/F salary-U.S.D.A. funds (Department of Corrections); 1/3 salary-Roanoke County (as originally planned); 2/3 salary-Department of Corrections (as originally planned); Fringes-U.S.D.A. and/or Roanoke County. SUBMI'T'TED f3Y Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred To Motion by: ACTION APPROVED BY: Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator VOTE No Yes Abs Brittle Garrett __ Johnson McGraw Nickens During the months of January and February, 1987, the following ~....~ economic development activities took place: 1. Activities coordinated with the Regional Partnership included the following: A. Requested information about tri-party agreements B. Forwarded site information on two industrial parcels C. Provided information on County demographic and stastical data for "Case" brochure updating. D. Received offer from Bob Bowman to visit Hasselt on behalf of Roanoke County during his Hannover visit in early April. E. Forwarded information on County business which could benefit from participation in Hannover Trade Fair. F. The Regional Partnership showed County industrial property to prospect G. Met with Partnership to discuss business targeting strategy 2. The following companies and individuals received a Certificate of Appreciation for building their business in Roanoke County: A. Barewood B. Bowing Enterprises (also known as Trebark) C. Nomar Castings D. McNeil Roofing and Sheet Metal Company Inc. E. S.C. Rossi & Company Inc. 3. Three responses were received from Plants, Sites, and Parks magazine as per an index reference in the January-February issue. The companies responding have been contacted and information has been forwarded. One response was from in- state and two from out-of-state. This index reference is a spin-off from our September-October 1986 ad which has now generated a total of 14 responses. 4. Seven local companies expressed a need to expand their operations. Two of these required a minimum of 5000 square feet of space, three required 8-15,000 square feet of space and two required over 20,000 square feet. In addition, two local companies requested information on vacant property for future development. 5. During the month of January, 1987, the Economic Development Division participated in National Development Council's program on the City as Real Estate Developer in Washington D.C. 6. The following companies were visited: A. ITT B. Dixie Farm Equipment If there are questions or comments, please advise. ITEM NUMBER ~ '" AT A REGULAR MEETING OF 'rHE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER IN ROANOKE, VA., ON TUESDAY, MEETING DATE: March 10, 1987 SUBJECT: Accounts Paid - February 1987 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Payments to Vendors: $2,416,151.40 Payroll: 02/06/87 Bi-weekly $337,550.56 02/20/87 Bi-weekly 362,242.40 $699,792.96 699,792.96 $3.115.944.36 A detailed listing of the payments is on file with the Clerk to the Board of Supervisors. SUBMITTED BY: ~C.JLQ'n'LQ~ 'U ,~i , Diane D. Hyatt Director, Department of Finance ------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred To APPROVED: Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator Brittle Garrett Johnson McGraw Nickens ITEM NUMBER D "' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 10, 1987 SUB._ JECT: Work Session - Design and Construction Standards for Water Facilities COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~~ ~ ~ SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The attached design and construction standards for water facili- ties were prepared by the Utility Director with input and review of a committee established by the Department of Development. The committee was comprised of staff members of the County Utilit Facilities, Fire, and Development Departments as well~asnrepre enta~ tives from local engineering and surveying firms, and the construction and building associations. These standards were written in order to achieve water installa- tions that will provide adequate water service to all t and provide fire flow that will meet the Insurance Servpce Organizas tion (ISO) requirements for fire protection. Major changes in these standards from the present water standards are as follows: 1. Requirement of fire flow meeting ISO Standards. 2. Minimum non-looped water line size for residential areas is increased from 6-inch to 8-inch diameter, and for non- residential areas it is increased from 6-inch to 12-inch diameter. 3. Minimum thickness class of ductile iron pipe is increased from Class 50 to Class 52. 4. PVC water pipe meeting American Water Works Association (AWWA) Standard for diameter ratio 14 is now acceptable. (Note: The thickness class of both the ductile iron and PVC pipe is larger than the minimum permitted by AWWA Standards. This was done since the minimum thickness class permitted by AWWA assumes certain pipe bedding requirements in order to limit the stress on the pipping. The County cannot afford to assign a full-time inspector to insure that these bedding requirements are consistently met. Therefore, the additional 1 thickness class pipe is used to provide a factor of~ af~ty against pipe failure.) 5. Pressure and leakage tests are performed on the entire water system including the service lateral. 6. Standards are provided for storage and pumping facilities including electrial and control systems. 7. Wider easements and provisions for future extensions of water lines are required within individual sites. 8. Additional easements and provisions for future extensions of water lines are required within individual sites. RECOMMENDATION: The staff recommends that these standards be adopted by resolu- tion at the March 24, 1987 Board Meeting as provided for in Chapter 22, entitled "Water," of the County Code. Provisions in Chapter 22 which conflict with these standards would be concurrently removed by Ordinance after the Second Reading scheduled for March 24, 1987. The effective date of the new standards will be discussed at the Work Session and established as the Board desires. It is further recom- mended that any developer that has received final approval prior to the effective date be given the option to fully comply with the new standards if they so desire. SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: _~ i~'~'~ __, Clifford ig, P.E. Elmer C. odg Utilities Director ~ County Administrator -------------------- ---------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Brittle Received ( ) Ref erred Garrett To Johnson McGraw Nickens 2 CJ DESIGN AND CONSTRQCTION STANDARDS FOR WATER FACILITIES 100.00 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS: A11 water supply systems, other than individual, in- cluding mains, valves, hydrants, and appurtenances shall be planned and constructed according to the specifications and standards set forth herein as minimum requirements. Before con- struction is commenced, plans, profiles, details, and specifica- tions shall be reviewed and approved by the Utility Director as bei:.g in accord with these requirements and all construction shall be in accord with approved plans. Water mains shall be located within public rights-of- way or easements and shall be located no closer than five (5) feet from the edge of the easement or right-of-way line t,inless ot.he;-wise authorized by the Utility Director. Easements shall p=oxide sufficient space for both installation and T~airztenance with a minimum width of 20 feet. Additional easement width may be required by the Utility Director when it is deemed necessary for proper maintenance of the facilitie shall be laid within a vertical areaswhich ~shpara~lel;~tolane within i2" of a waterline. DE~,IGN: 6v'ater supply systems as described above shall ce de- signed by a Professional Engineer, licensed by the Commonwealth of Virginia whose seal and signature shall be placed on each plan sheet. A Land Surveyor licensed by the Commonwealth of Virginia may design such portions of a water supply system as provided by the Code of Virginia, Title 54, Section 54-17.1, 3(b). Systems shall be designed to provide adequate flow and pressure both for domestic supply and fire flow, based on sound hydraulic analysis and good engineering practice. Domestic and fire flows shall be analyzed and presented separately and pi es shall be sized to meet the calculated requirements of simultaPe- ous peak domestic and fire flow. 100.01 The Design and Construction Standards Manual of Roanoke County, Virginia, of which these specifications are a approved by the Board of Supervisors shall be followed uPless specified deviation therefore is authorized, in writing, by the Utility Director. When such deviations effect fire protection concurrent authorization by the Fire Marshal shall also be 1 obtained. All standards referenced in this Section shall refer to the latest revision or revised edition of the referenced manual. 101.02 The minimum size of water line shall be as follows: A. In residential districts, eight inch (8"); six inch (6") may be used only when it completes a good gridiron, and only, in blocks six hundred feet (600') or less in length. B. In other areas, twelve inch (12") and eight inch (8"); eight inch may be used only when it completes a good gridiron and twelve inch for Long lines not interconnected. C. Fire hydrants shall not be installed on lines less than eight inches (8") in diameter, except that fire hydrants may be installed on a six inch (6") line that is part of good gridiron. Unless specifically approved otherwise by the Fire Marshal, no plantings or erection of other obstructions shall be made within a four feet (4') radius of any fire hydrant. The surface shall be level within this same radius. D. For the last 450 feet of pipe located beyond the last fire hydrant on cul-de-sacs or streets on which the water line cannot be extended, six inch (6") pipe may be used, when approved by Utility Director. E. In lieu of the above, and for residential districts only, detailed design calculations may be submitted for review and concurrence by the Utility Director to substantiate line sizes other than those specified above. In any case, the minimum line size acceptable shall be six inch (6"). For all design, the published "C" factor shall be re- duced to "new pipe "C" factor minus 10" . This reduced "C" factor shall be used so as to reflect more accurately the future flow in aged pipe. 101.03 In general, fire hydrants shall be located as follows: A. In residential areas, at street interv=ections and at intermediate locations where necessary, as determined by the Fire Marshal's Office. In no case shall the distance between fire hydrants, measured along the center line of accessible streets, be greater than one thousand feet (1000'). 2 B. Within one hundred feet (100') of any standpipe or sprinkler system fire department connections, where those systems are required in buildings. C. As required by the following schedule as given by use group, the distance shall be measured to the most remote part of the structure the hydrant will serve. Industrial buildings 250 feet School buildings 300 feet Commercial, Churches and Office buildings 350 feet Apartments, Multi-family, Townhouses 250 feet Single family detached dwellings 500 feet* *Measured along center line of street to the center of front property line for single family detached dwellings only. D. All hydrants shall be a minimum of fifty feet (50') away from buildings c-:her than single family detached dwellings. The location of all new and existing hydrants that are to serve the property shall be shown on the plans. 101.04 Water systems shall be so designed to adequately supply the normal and peak demands of all customers, maintaining a pres- sure of not less than twenty-five (25) pounds per square inch at all points of delivery, without reducing the service to existing customers below the foreg~~ing requirement, and shall have ade- quate capacity to be capable of delivering not less than the below fire flaws, with a residual pressure of not less than twenty (20) pounds per square inch to at least one (1) point with- in two hundred fifty feet (250') of each building to be served or proposed to be served by an extension. In those cases where the existing source of supply cannot deliver fire flows at adequate pressures, the developer shall design his water system based on achieving the required fire flows with an assumed residual pressure of 30 psi at point of connection to the supplying system. I. Fire flow Requirements for Various Land Uses 1. Residential Areas as follows: A. Normal residential property with over 100' between buildings--500 GPM. B. Normal residential property with 31'-100' between buildings--750 GPM. C. Normal residential property with 11'-30' 3 between buildings--1,000 GPM D. Story and one-half residential--1000 GPM. E. Two-story residential, congested area--1500 gallons per minute (GPM). F. Normal residential property with 10' or less between buildings--1,500 GPM 2. High Value P_reas: A. Apartments, townhouses up to 2~ stories--1500 GPM. B. Minor mercantile and congested apartments, 2~ to 3 stories--2000 GPM. C. High value industrial, shopping centers, and mercantile districts--2500 GPM. In areas of mixed use development, the higher fire flow shall govern. The fire flows indicated above are for new develop- ment. Where the size and scope of the development exceeds these requirements, additional flow shall be provided in accordance with ISO (Insurance Services Organization) requirements as reviewed by the Fire Marshal. 101.5 Valves shall be so set and adjusted that the covers shall be exposed and flush with the street surface. If street surfaces are renewed or replaced by the developer or owner after the water system has been approved and accepted by the County but while such streets are still the obligation of the developer or owner, the valve vaults therein shall be readjusted to proper location relative to the new street surfacing. Valve vaults located in sodded or other off-street areas shall be so set and adjusted that the covers shall be exposed and flush with the finished surface elevation. 101.06 Where a water main that can be extended is terminated beyond a gate valve in that main, the minimum length of pipe line between valve and end of the line shall be thirty-six feet (36'). Additional length shall be required to insure future extension with minimum surface destruction. In no case shall the end of a pipe line terminate in a paved area. No water line shall terminate under a concrete valley gutter. Whenever possible to avoid, no gate valve shall be located under a concrete valley gutter. No services or fire hydrant shall be installed between the gate valve and end of line that can be extended. 4 101.07 All pipe shall be laid to a minimum depth of thirty-six inches (36") from established final grade to the top of the pipe. Water pipe shall not be laid at depths exceeding ten (10') feet unless specifically approved by the Utility Director. 101.08 Valves shall be installed at the intersection of water lines. Generally, three (3) valves will be used at crosses and two (2) valves at tees. A valve shall also be installed at least every one thousand feet (1000') on distribution mains. A valve shall be installed between the last service and the terminus of any water main that can be extended in the future. 101.09 A means to provide a blow off at dead-end lines shall be provided as indicated in the standard details. 101.10 Automatic air release valves and/or hydrants shall be placed at strategic high points in the system to provide for the release of trapped air. ICl.ll All transmission mains will be provided with blow off valves at strategic low points in the line. Fire hydrants shall not be used at low points in place of blowoffs. 101.12 Cross connections and backflow prevention connections shall be designed and reviewed to insure compliance with the adopted cross-connection and backflow ordinance. 101.13 Water mains may be installed on private property if an easement of a minimum of twenty feet (20') in width is duly re- corded. The easement width may be reduced in certain areas with written approval of the Utility Director when the 20 foot ease- ment would constitute a significant hardship for the development. Increased easement widths may be required by the Utility Director when determined necessary due to large mains or excessive depths which will require special trench excavation in order to comply with applicable State and Federal safety regulations. Easement instruments denoting water line easements shall include a note giving the water purveyor the right of access to the water service connection and the water meter for the purpose of mainte- nance and operation. No permanent structure, including fences, trees or shrubbery, shall be placed or constructed within an easement. Additional easements shall be provided across property under the owners/developers control that may be required to extend water facilities in the future or to provide convenient access to easements for construction and maintenance purposes. 101.14 AWWA STANDARDS The following AWWA Standards (latest revision) are here- by incorporated by reference. Where a conflict exists between these written standards, and the standards incorporated by reference, the Utility Director will determine which standard shall apply. In general, the Utility Director will select the 5 Standard that gives a final product that is in the best interest to the County. The applicant shall provide the County with manufacturer's certification that materials meet these standards. A100 Standard for water wells. C104 Standard for cement-mortar lined for ductile-iron and gray-iron pipe and fittings. C110 Standard for ductile-iron and gray-iron fittings. Clll Standard for rubber gasket joints for ductile-iron and gray-iron pipe and fittings. C115 Standard for flanged ductile-iron and gray-iron pipe with threaded flanges. C150 Standard for thickness design ~f ductile-iron pipe (Class 52 minimum to be considered zor 12" diameter or less) C151 Standard for ductile-iron pipe C502 Standard for dry-barrel fire hydrants C504 Standard for rubber-seated butterfly valves (approved for l~-inch or larger) C506 Standard for backflow prevention devices C50$ Standard for swing-check valves C509 Standard for resilant-seated gate valves C550 Standard for protective interior coatings for valves and hydrants C600 Standard for installation and testing of duct~ile- iron water mains and their appurtenances C651 Standard for disinfecting water mains C602 Standard for cement-mortar lining of water pipe lines C652 Standards for disinfection of water storage facilities C900 Polyvinyl chloride (PVC) pressure pipe, for water (DR-14 minimum class to be considered). C950 Glass-fiber-reinforced-resin pressure pipe DI00 Standard for welded steel tanks for water storage D102 Standard for painting steel water storage tanks D103 Standard for factory-coated bolted water storage tanks 102.00 Water Line Construction 102.01 General: Except as specifically modified below, water line construction shall meet the requirements of AWWA C-600 latest edition Standards. Pipe, fittings, valves, hydrants and accessories shall be loaded and unloaded by lifting with hoists or skidding so as to avoid shock or damage. Under no circum- stances shall such materials be dropped. Pipe shall be so handled that any coating or lining is not damaged. The water main shall be laid and maintained to the re- quired lines and grades with fittings, valves, hydrants and acces- sories set at the required locations as indicated on the approved plans for the project. All valve and hydrant stems shall be set plumb. Whenever obstructions not shown on the plans are encountered during progress of the work and interfere to such an 6 extent that alteration in plans is required, the Utility Director or his authorized representative shall be advised and the Utility Director's approval given before such alterations are put into effect. Any such alternative design shall be designed or approved by the Engineer of record for the original design. 102.02 Excavation and Bedding and Backfill. The trench shall be dug so that the pipe can be laid to the alignment and depth required and it shall be excavated not more than five hundred feet (500') in advance of the completed pipe laying operation. The width of the trench shall be ample to permit the pipe to be placed, backfill and thoroughly compacted in accordance with the requirements of these specifications. Trenches shall be of such extra widths as will permit the convenient placing of timber sup- ports, sheeting and bracing and handling of special fittings or appurtenances when required. The trench sha h be excavated to the depth required so as to provide a uniform and continuous bearing and support for the pipe on solid and undisturbed ground at every point between bell holes; except that it will be permissible to disturb and otherwise damage the finished surface over a maximum length of eighteen inches (18") near the middle of each length of pipe by the withdrawal of pipe slings or other lifting tackle. The damaged area shall be refinished as near as possble. Any part of the bottom of the trench excavated below the specified grade, shall be backfilled with approved materials, and be thoroughly compacted. The finished subgrade shall be prepared accurately by means of hand tools. Bedding shall be placed as required by the pipe manufacturer's written installation instructions. Where excavation is made in fractured rock, boulders, or other unsuitable material, the subgrade shall be made by backfill- ing with a minimum four inch (4") compacted depth of gravel or clean selected soil which shall be thoroughly compacted. Bell holes shall be provided at each joint to permit the jointing to be made properly and to permit maximum bedding length. Ledge rocks, boulders, and large stones shall be removed to provide a clearance of at least six inches (6") below and on each side of the pipe and appurtenances being laid and any part, pro- jection or joint of such rock, or stone. No pipe shall be laid in water or when, in the opinion of the Utility Director, trench conditions are unsuitable. Backfill shall be placed in two (2) equal depth layers to the top of the pipe and each layer shall be thoroughly tamped to ninety-five percent (95$) of the maximum theoretical density as determined by a standard proctor test, the remainder of th e back- 7 fill shall be placed in a maximum of two foot (2') layers mechani- cally tamped. Backfill material shall be free of perishable material, frozen clods, sticky masses of clay and other unsuit- able matter. Rock pieces larger than two inches (2") shall not be used in the backfill which is within two feet (2') of the pipe. Backfill within existing or proposed roads shall meet the require- ments established and required by the Virginia Department of Transportation. 102.03 Installation of Pipe and Fittings. When installing pipe in the trench, proper implements, tools, and facilities satisfactory to the Utility Director and as recommended by the material manufacturer shall be provided and used by the contrac- tor `or the safe and convenient prosecution of the work. All pipe valves, fittings, hydrants and accessories shall be care- fully lowered into the trench, piece by piece, by means of a derrick, ropes, slings or other suitable tools or equipment in such a manner as to prevent damage to the water main material anc any protective coatings and linings. Under no circumstances shall water main materials be dropped or dumped into the trench. The pipe and fittings shall be inspected for defects, and while suspended above grade, be rung with a light hammer to detect cracks. All lumps, blisters and excess coal tar coatings shall be removed from the ends of ductile iron pipe, and the outside of the spigot and the inside of the bell shall be wiped clean and dry and free from oil and greases before the pipe is laid. Every precaution shall be taken to prevent foreign material including nonpotable water from entering the pipe while it is being placed in the line. If the pipe-laying crew cannot put the pipe into the trench and in place without getting earth into it, a heavy tightly woven canvas bag of suitable size shall be placed over each end and left there until the connection is to be made to the adjacent pipe. During laying operations, no debris, tools, clothing, or other materials shall be placed in the pipe. At the end of each day a watertight plug shall be placed in the end of all pipe opening. After placing a length of pipe in the trench, the spigot end shall be centered in the open bell of the pipe line and the pipe pushed home so that the face of the spigot is in close contact with the shoulder of the bell. Water pipe shall be laid with the bell facing the direction of the laying. No stub of any water main shall terminate with a capped or plugged valve. Where a valve is required to be installed near a stub end, not less than 36 feet of pipe shall be installed between the valve and the plugged stub end of pipe for adequate anchoring. The cutting of pipe for inserting valves, fittings, or closure pieces shall be done in a neat and workmanlike manner 8 without damage to the pipe or cement lining and so as to leave a smooth end at right angles to the axis of the pipe. When machine cutting is not available for cutting metal pipe twenty inches (20") in diameter or larger, the electric-arc cut- ting method will be permitted using a carbon or steel rod. Only qualified and experienced workmen shall be used for this work. The flame cutting of metal pipe by means of oxyacetylene torch will not be allowed. Whenever it is necessary to deflect pipe from a straight line, either in the vertical or horizontal plane, to avoid obstructions or plumb stems, or where long-radius curves are approved, the amount of deflection allowed shall not exceed the minimum required, for satisfactory joining of the pipes, as specified in this manual. The maximum deflection permitted per joint shall be in accordance AWWA C-600 Table 4 for push-on joint and Table 5 for mechanical joint pipe. (C-600: Table 4 may be used for C-900 pipe also). All tees, bends, plugs, caps, and fire hydrants shall be substantially braced, blocked and/or strapped to prevent any move- ments by providing adequate reaction backing and/or tie rods. Reaction backing shall be designed and installed as indicated in the standard dr~ails. Hydrants shall be set to established finished grade as f ollows A. The bottom of the four and one-half inch (4~") nozzle shall be beteen eighteen inches (18") and twenty-four inches ( 24" ) above the finish elevation of tt:e edge of the shoulder on streets without curb and gutter between eighteen end twenty-four inches (18")-(24") above the elevation of the curb on streets with curb and gutter as indicated on the standard details. B. The two and one-half inch (2~") hose connections shall have a minimum of four feet zero inches (4'0") clearance on all sides. C. Surface shall be approximately level within a four foot (4') radius of the hydrant. 102.04 Testing. All new water mains shall be tested, after backfil~.ing to a hydrostatic pressure of not less than 100 psi above ne design water pressure for the system or 150 psi, which- ever i:: greater. The allowable leakage is calculated by the following formula: L= S P Where: L= allowable leakage in gallons per hour 133,200 S= length of pipe tested in feet 9 D= nominal diameter of pipe in inches P= average test pressure during leakage test in psig Allowable leakage is calculated in columnar form in the following Table 6. No water line shall be placed in service until the leakage is less than the allowable leakage as indicated above. Testing of water mains shall only be done after installation of all valves, taps and service laterals are complete. All portions of the water system including hydrants and service lines shall be subject to the hydrostatic pressure during the leakage test. Testing of water mains shall be observed and documented by a County Utility Inspector/Engineer. All high points and service lines in the portion of the system under test shall be vented and all air shall be expelled from the system prior to beginning the test. All fittings and hydrants shall be properly braced or blocked before appiyir.g pressure. Where concrete thrust blocks are used, they shall have attained their final set prior to testing. After the portion of the system under the test has reached the required pressure as stated herein, said pressure shall be maintained for two (2) hours. At the conclusion of the pressure test, the volume of makeup water required to refill the pipeline shall be determined by measurement with a displacement meter or by pumping from a vessel of known volume. All joints or fittings at which leakage occurs shall be re- worked to insure tightness. All visible leaks shall be repaired regardless of amount of leakage. If the measured amount of leakage exceeds the values for the appropriate size as found in AWWA Specification C600, Hydrostatic Testing (Table 6), the pipe- line shall be repaired and retested until leakage is within the limit set by the referenced specification. Methods of repair prior to retesting will be done with the Utility Director's approval and inspection. Repairs of new construction will be by adjustment or replacement of material only. The use of repair clamps or bell clamps will not be acceptable. 10 IIJSTALLATION C~ DUCTILE-IRCN VOTER MAINS TAHIE 4 Maximum Joint Deflection* Full-Length Pipe-Push-0n Type Joint Maximum Offset-S1' in. (m) Approx. Radius of Produced by Succession ft. (m> Curve-Rt of Joints Naninal Deflection 18 ft. 20 ft. 18 ft (5.5 m) 20 ft ( 6.1 m) Pipe Size Angle - 0 ( 5.5 m ) ( 6 .1 m ) L1' Lt in. d L L 3 5 19 (0.48) 21 (0.53) 205 (62) 230 (70) 4 5 19 (0.48) 21 (0.53) 205 (62) 230 (70) 6 5 19 (0.48) 21 (0.53) 205 (62) 230 (70) 8 5 19 (0.48) 21 (0.53) 205 (62) 230 (70) 10 5 19 (0.48) 21 (0.53) 205 (62) 230 (70) 12 5 19 (0.48) 21 (0.53) 205 (62) 230 (70) 14 3* 11 (0.28) 12 (0.30) 340 (104) 380 (115) 16 3* 11 (0.28) 12 (0.30) 340 (104) 380 ;115) 18 3* 11 (0.28) 12 (0.30) 340 (104) 380 (115) 20 3* 11 (0.28) 12 (0.30) 340 (104) 380 (115) 24 3* 11 (0.28) 12 (0.30) 340 (104) 380 (115) 30 3* 11 (0.28) 12 (0.30) 340 (104) 380 (115) 36 3* 11 (0.~~?) 12 (0.30) 340 (104) 380 (115) 42 2* 7~ (0.19) 8 (0.20) 510 (155) 570 (174) 48 2* 7~ (0.19) 8 (0.20) 510 (155) 570 C174) 54 l~* 5~ (O.I4) E 6 (0.15) 680 (207) 760 (232) *For 14-in. and larger push-ten joints, maximum deflection angle may be larger than shown above. Consult manufacturer. #See Figure 4. 11 TABTE 5 Maximum Joint Deflection Ftiill-Length Pipe - Mechanical~7oint Pipe Maximum Offset-S* Approx. Radius of curve-x~ in (m) Produced by Succession of Joints ft (m) Nominal Def lection 18 ft . 20 ft . Pipe Size Angle- 0 (5.5 m) (6.1 m) i8 ft. (5.5 m) 20 ft. (6.1 m) in. d L* L* L* L* 3 8-18 31 (0.79) 31 (0.89) 125 (38) 140 (43) 4 8-18 31 (0.79) 35 (0.89) 125 (38) 140 (43) 6 7-07 27 (0.69) 30 (0.76) 145 (44) 160 (49) 8 5-21 20 (0.51) 22 (0.56) 195 (59) 220 (67) 10 5-21 20 (0.51) 22 (0.56) 195 (59) 220 (67) 12 5-21 20 (0.51) 22 (0.56) 195 (59) 220 (67) 14 3-35 13(0.34) 15 (0.38) 285 (87) 320 (98) 16 3-35 13(0.34) 15 (0.38) 285 (87) 320 (98) 18 3-00 11 (0.28) 12 (0.30) 340 (104) 380 (116) 20 3-00 11 (0.28) 12 (0.30) 340 (104) 380 (116) 24 2-23 9 (0.23) IO (0.25) 450 (137) 500 (152) 30 2-23 9 (0.23) 10 (0.25) 450 (137) 500 (152) 36 2-05 8 (0.20) 9 (0.23) 500 (152) 550 (167) 42 2-00 7(0.19) 8 (0.20) 510 (155) 570 (174) 48 2-00 7(0.19) 8 (0.20) 510 (155) 570 (174) *See Figure 4. 12 v C .,•~ rl .~ a O tIl O J-1 4-1 O O O r-1 N Or-I NN~MM1Cl~M L!1 ~M0~~0 ' ~ sr Of •d ~0~-111101 CO 00(~~lO~OICLflllld'd'd' N ~ d' ~ er d' O O r--I Ol t~ r~ M O ~ONI~N011~d'0[~d'Ol0 ~ ~ . . . . . . . . . . . 1~ [~ l0 lG t!•1 Lf1 L!1 t[1 d' C e1' M •~ Ol rl O ~G M 01 M lC [~ ~D M t11 1p M 01 c!' N 01 l~ C' r-'1 00 tll r-i ~ d' IO~CLlllfltflV'd'd' V'MMM 1 N O M rl l0 aD 00 t~ t!1 N aD .-- i~d'O1t,~t'N000111MO[~ r-1 l0 M ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ M M M M N N r OpOr--IOMl000Q1aD~DN 111 I~ In N 01 I~ LCl M r-i 01 1~ Lfl N 11 ~ . . . . . C' d' d' M M M M M N N N N t r--I ~ r1-61 N O t` N Ol tf1 O Lfl 00 r--I ri O 00 f`'1 U r , Op ~D M ri 01 00 I~ 1!1 M N 0 . . . . . • a d N • MMMMNNNNN NN~--1 ~ .Q I Op O r-1 O 01 I~ LCl N O d' 00 O r-I O OD lD cp M N o-1 01 O lD ll1 fn ~ ~Uj ~ M M N N N N N N r-'1 ~ rl r--1 O •.i 00 t~ L[1 M N r-1 O 01 l` l0 LCl M ~ +' Q rl N N N N N N N ri r-i r-I .--1 ri ~ N • • tf10-f10v,0000~t~~'O ' O ~ ~ a MN tfld'N0010100[~~d • ~ S ~ ~O rl N N N N r1 rl r1 r•1 r? r--I ••"1 '"'~ R-S1 ~ MOt~N~'V 0001C1O~1 Nr-10100 [~li~~~'MNr10 4-1 O .~ r-I N N r-1 r•a r-1 r-1 r-1 r-1 r-! r-1 !-1 r-I Ul r-1 O 01 lp 01 N lfl OD 01 O r-1 O 1 O Ol -1 ' ' •~ +~ C2 1~ r M N r d 01 00 l0 t11 d + N • U N rti r-1 ri rl r1 rl rl r-•1 rl rl r1 r1 O N • ~ ~ 1 tA~ 1 01000d'O1MlD01N~N1 [~ G U t11 111 c1' M N r--~ r-~ 001 01 00 ,-{ ~ ,-~ ~ r--1 .--I r-1 ri r-I O O O O ~ ~ l~0(yd'011101110~t'[~O N N r~--•ii O O 01 01 00 OD l~ l0 lC ~ O~ v 4-I 00 r-1 r•~ r--1 rl r1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ N~~ 1f'1 O d' OD to r-1 OD d' 01 Lfl O Lfl N ~ 1~ 01 01 00 I~ l~ t~ l0 l0 tll t!1 l!1 ~ 1~ ~ •rl l0 . . . . . . . . 000000000000 ,-~ S-I ~ ~ d'O~DN 0[~111MOt~d'O ~ •~ ~p~p 1111f1111~v1'd~cf'MMM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N~ ~ C01.[1N01 [~lpd'NOOpLf1M • M .~~d'MMMMMMNNN ~ ~ O O O O O O O O O O O O a a1 RS ~ S,•1 '.~' W _________ ~~~ r-I O d' r•1 Ol ~ ~O 'd' N O Ol I~ M N N N r~ r-i r-I ri r-I ri ~•~ O ~ ~ O .~ [Jj \~ ~ .,, i v v v v v v v v v ~ N "~ O O O O 111 O 111 O Lfl O L(1 O O 4-1 ~ (.1~ M N N N N r-~ r~ r-~ r•1 eM 'a' M •K N "f~ M .-~ 103.00 WATERLINE PIPE, FITTINGS, AND ACCESSORIES All pipe for water main construction shall be either ductile cast iron pressure pipe of the push-on joint or "mechanical joint" variety, conforming to AWWA C151, latest revision. Thick- ness class shall be Class 52 for all pipe twelve inches (12"> in diameter or less. Water mains larger than 12" diameter in size, shall have thickness class as determined by thickness design of ductile-iron pipe AWWA C150; or; Polyvinyl chloride (PVC) conforming to AWWA C900 with DI O.D. Dimension ratio (DR)14 shall be minimum for PVC pipe. (SDR-PVC pipe shall not be used as part of any water system.) Water mains larger than 12" diameter in size, shall meet requirements, Uni-Bell-B-11 for (DR-18), PR 235 and have intergal bell with bonded in ring and spigot joint. On specific authorization of the Utility Director, transmission lines may be PVC meeting Uni-Bell-B-11 with (DR-25) PR-165 rating. 103,01 Ductile Cast Iron Standard Mechanical Joint Pipe, All ductile cast iron standard mechanical joint water pipe shall con- form to ANSI Specification A21.51 and shall be lined with cement mortar and have a protective exterior coating. The linings and protective coatings equal to "Enameline" with tar coating in the exterior will be considered as a satisfactory lining for the water pipe, however, any substitution in pipe lining and/or coat- ing from the ANSI A21.4 shall be specifically approved by the Utility Director. Joints of standard mechanical joint pipe shall conform to ANSI Specifications A21.11. High strength cast iron tee head bolts, hex nuts, cast or ductile iron glands and rubber gaskets shall be as furnished by the pipe manufacturer. All tie bolts and nuts shall be con- structed of the same size and type material as head bolts and hex nuts. In making connections of ductile cast iron pipe using the standard mechanical joint, the gland followed by the rubber gasket shall be placed over the plain end of the pipe, which shall be carefully inserted and aligned into the socket end of the pipe line. The gasket shall then be pushed into position so that it is evenly seated in the socket. The gland shall then be moved into position against the face of the gasket, bolts inserted and made finger tight. The bolts shall then be tightened up in accordance with AWWA C-600 Table 3 (75-90 FT-LB Torque for pipe size 4-12"). All other requirements concerning bedding, alignment, and cleaning of the pipe before making the joint shall be followed. 103.02 Ductile Cast Iron Pipe - "Push-On Joint." All "push-on" or "slip" joint pipe shal conform to the requirements of standard mechanical joint pipe in regard to strength, class, protective coating, etc. 14 103.03 Polyvinyl chloride (PVC) pressure pipe for water. PVC pipe meeting the AWWA specification C900 for dimension ratio (DR) 14, pressure Class 200, may be used for water lines. DR-18 or DR-25 may be used as noted above for pressure pipe larger than 12" in diameter. a. PVC pipe shall be installed, embedded and backfilled according to the manufacturer's written instructions. To facilitate future locating of PVC water pipe, a metalic wire shall be laid with the pipe and in contact with all fittings and valves. b. All service line connections to PVC pipe shall be made using a service saddle and corporation stop. The service saddle shall be of a type specifically manufactured for PVC pipe and shall be of the extra wide or double-band type. No direct tap to PVC pipe will be permitted. c. Only bell and spigot with elastomeric gasket joints shall be used. Solvent-cement joint; or pipe requiring use of couplings shall not be used. 103.04 Cast Iron Pi e Fittin s Fittings for all water pipes shall be ductile iron or gray cast iron in accordance with AWWA Specifications C110, latest revision, with a minimum pres- sure rating of 250 psi. 103.05 Gate Valve. All gate valves shall be of superior quality iron body with resilent seat and with full bronze mount. All gate valves shall withstand a workin shall be in strict conformance to applicabPeeAWWAeStandaOdssl The wrench nut shah turn to the left (counter clock-wise) to open valve. The valves shall be so arranged to fit into pipe lines having standardized mechanical joints or slip joints. All valves shall be resilent seat type valves meeting AWWA C-509ate latest revision Standards. On valves fourteen inches (14") or larger, butterfly valves conforming to AWWA C-504 may be used. 103.06 Fire Hydrants All hydrants shall be traffic model, Dry-Barrel type, meeting AWWA C-502 latest revision Standard; either Mueller Centurion, Dresser 500 Traffic Model, Darling Model B-50-B, Quick Fix Kennedy K-81-A or approved equal. Hydrants shall be of the compression type with main valve openings not less than four and one-half inches (4 1/2") in aiameter. Hydrants shall have a cast or ductile iron body with full bronze trim and shall withstand a hydrostatic test pressure of 300 psi. Hydrants shall have a six inch (6") connection base for setting with a minimum of thirty-six inch (36") cover on connection pipe. Hydrants shall be equipped with hose connections as follows: Two each 2~", N.S.T, hose connections 15 One each 4}', N.S.T. pumper connections Hydrant shall be operated by a National Standard 1 1/2 inch pentagon shaped, operating nut, opeing counter-clockwise. The direction of opening shall be clearly marked by an arrow cast on the outside of the hydrant. Hydrants shall be connected to the main with a six inch (6") pipe and shall be controlled by an inde- pendent six inch (6") gate valve. The six inch (6") gate valve shall be located as near to the service main as practical, and connected to the tee with tie rods. All hydrant barrels shall be painted chrome, and all 2~ and 4~ inch caps of the hydrant painted with red reflective paint. (The County Fire Marshal will color code caps after flow testing). 103.0? Valve vaults: Valve vaults shall be used for all main line caves unless otherwise approved in writing by the Utility Direct,~r. All vaults shall be precast manhole cone sections with water manhole covers as shown on the standard detail sheet. 103.08 Valve boxes: All valve boxes, base extensions, head ar,d cover shall be of cast or ductile iror. Valve boxes shall be of the Mueller sliding type, round head marked "Water." The shaft diamete- shall not be less than five inches (5"). The valve boxes shall have a minimum rage of extension to fit two inch (2") to twelve inch (12") valves inclusive, placed on mains at depths of three feet, (3') to five feet (5') of cover in order that the to cover of the valve box is set to finished grade. Valve boxes shall be Mueller Company 10364, or approved equal. Valve boxes shall be centered over the valve screw and set plumb. Valve boxes shall only be allowed on fire hydrant valves or on other installations approved in writing by the Utility Director. 103.09 Water Service Connections. The water meter box and accessories therein necessary for meter installation shall be furnished and installed by the developer just within the right-of-way/easement at the property line as shown on the approved subdivision or other property plat. Water meter box and meter setter shall be furnished and installed as shown on the Standard Details. All meter setters shall be equipped with intergal lockable valves on both sides of the meter connections. All water services pipe from main connections to the meter box assembly shall be "K" type copper. All connections shall use flared fittings. The minimum size service connection shall be "K" type copper, 3/4" I.D, f or a single setter, and 1-inch I.D. for double setter. Fittings for service lines shall meet AWWA specification C800. Solder connection shall not be used for underground service. 103.10 Wet Taps. All taps to the County water system shall be made by the County Utility Department. 16 103.11 Special Conditions. The Director may require special material and/or construction be used where normal water pressure exceeds the pressure rating used in these standards and where the design will not permit reducing these pressures to acceptable levels. 104.00 METER INSTALLATIONS. All water meters shall be in- stalled by the County Utility Department. 105.00 DISINFECTION WATER MAINS After testing and before final inspection of the com- pleted systems, water mains and service laterals shall be flushed and disinfected in accordance with AWWA Specification C651 latest revision. Flushing shall be accomplished at a flow velocity of not less than 2.5 feet per second. Disinfection as described in AWWA C651 - "Placing of calcium hypochlorite tablets" shall be used. 5 gram calcium hypochlorite tablets with 3.25 g available chlorine per tablet shall be attached at the inside top of the pipe by an adhesive such as Permatex No. 1 or equal. The following number of tablets for the given pipe size shall be used for an initial dose of 25 mg/1 (ppm) chlorine: Number Tablets Per Pipe Diameter 18-20 Ft. Pipe Section 6" 1 8" 2 10" 3 12" 4 16" 7 or the number of tablets equal to 0.0012d2L rounded to the next higher integer, where d is the inside diameter, in inches and L is the length of the pipe section, in feet. Use of the °ontinuous feed or slug method of disinfecting may only be used to re-chlorinate a water pipe after the initial disinfection or in other specific cases approved by the Utility Director. The disinfection solution shall remain in the pipe line for not less than twenty-four (24) hours, after which time a chlorine residual of 10 ppm at all parts of the line shall be required. Following chlorination, the piping shall be thoroughly flushed. The water in the new main shall be proven comparable in quality, by testing, to the existing public water supply. The Virginia Waterworks Regulations require at least two consecutive satisfactory bacteriological samples from the distribution system before the system can be placed in service. The County will pay the cost of lab testing for the first set of bacteriological samples. The Developer/Contractor shall pay all costs associated 17 with disinfection and testing of installed facilities and any additional bacteriological samples required after the first set. 106.00 SEPARATION OF WATER LINES AND SANITARY SEWERS General - the following factors shall be considered in providing adequate separation: A. Materials and types of joints for water and sewer pipe; B. Soil conditions; C. Service branch connections into the water line and sewer lines; D. Compensating variations in the horizontal and vertical separations; E. offsetting of pipes around manholes. 106.01 Parallel Installation A. Normal conditions - water lines shall be laid at least ten feet (10') horizontally from a sewer line whenever possible, the distance shall be measured edge-to- edge unless determined by the Director to be unusual conditions. B. Unusual conditions -When local conditions prevent a horizontal separation described above, the following construction shall be used: 1. The bottom (invert) of the water main shall be at least eighteen inches (18") above the tap of the (crown) of the sewer. 2. Where this vertical separation cannot be obtained, the sewer shall be constructed of AWWA approved water pipe, pressure tested in place without leakage prior to backfilling. Pressure test shall be 30 psi. 3. The sewer manhole shall be made 100$ water-tight construction and tested in place by filling with water to top of manhole cover frame. 106.02 Crossing A. Normal conditions - water lines crossing over sewers shalt. be laid to provide a separation of at least eighteen inches (18"> between the bottom of the water line and the top of the sewer whenever possible. 18 B. Unusual conditions - when local conditions prevent a vertical separation as described above, the following construction shall be used: 1. Sewers passing over or under water lines shall be constructed of AWWA approved water pipe, pressure tested in plce without leakage prior to backfill. Pressure test shall 30 psi. 2. Water lines passing under sewers shall, in addition, be protected by providing: (a) A vertical separation of at least eighteen inches (18") between the bottom of the sewer and the top of the water line. Sewer shall be concrete encased along its length where it is within 10' of the water line. (b) Adequate structural support for the sewers to pre- vent excessive deflection of the joints and the settling on and breaking of the water line. (c) The length of the water line be centered at the point of the crossing so that joints shall be equidistant and as far as possible from the sewer. 106.03 Sewers or Sewer Manholes. No water pipes shall pass through or come in contact with any part of a sewer manhole. 107.00 VALVE, AIRRELIEF, AND BLOW-OFF CHAMBER During construction, air and sediment accumulations may be removed through a standard fire hydrant; compressed air and pumping may be used for dewatering mains through hydrants. Chambers or pits containing valves, blow-offs, meters, or other such appurtenances to a distribution system shall not be connected directly to any storm drain or sanitary sewer, nor shall blow-offs or air relief valves be connected directly to any sewer. Such chambers or pits shall be drained to the surface of the ground where they are not subject to flooding by surface water, or to absorption pits underground in areas with sufficiently deep water table. The design engineer shall indicate the size of air re- lief discharge required on the plan sheet. 108.00 SURFACE WATER CROSSING Surface water crossings, both over and under water, present special problems and should be discussed with the Utility Director before final plans are prepared. 19 A. Above Water Crossings - The pipe above water crossings shall be: 1. Adequately supported; 2. Protected from damage from freezing; 3. Accessible for repair or replacement; and 4. Above 100 year flood Level. B. Under Water Crossing: 1. The pipe shall be of special construction, having flexible watertight joints; i.e. ball and socket, lock-joint, and shall be Class 54 or 55. In lieu of the above, Class 52 DI pipe may be used with a minimum of one foot all sides being concrete en- cased within the 100 year flood way limits; 2. Valves shall be provided at both ends of the water crossing so that the section can be isolated for tests or repair; the valves shall be easily accessible and not subject to flooding by the 100 year storm flood level; 3. Sample taps shall be available at each end of the crossing and at reasonable distance from each side of the crossing. 109.00 WATER STORAGE FACILITIES: Water storage facilities shall be designed and con- structed to meet the requirements of AWWA D100 for "Welded Steel Tanks" or AWWA D103 for "Factory Coated Bolted Steel Tanks" for water storage, latest edition Standard except as hereafter speci- fied otherwise. Precast concrete water storage reservoirs may be required by the Director under specific conditions that require below ground reservoirs. All precast concrete water storage reservoirs will be designed by Roanoke County using applicable standards. A. Steel Standpipe, reservoirs and accessories. 1. Supplemental Information to both AWWA D100 and AWWA D103. a. Earthquake Desi~3n: Seismic Zone 2 using fixed percentage method of 5$. b. Electric Power: Developer/Contractor's responsiblity. 20 c. Compressed Air: Developer/Contractor's responsibility. 2. d. Concrete Work: Comply with all requirements of ACI 301. Supplemental Information to AWWA D100. a. Corrosion Allowances: 1/16 inch to parts in contact with water. b. Submit written report certifying work was inspected as set forth in AWWA D100, Sec 11.2.1. Mill and shop inspection by commercial inspection agency is required. c. Submit details of all welded joints referenced on design drawings in accordance with AWWA D100, Sec. 1.4. d. Mill Scale: Completely remove by blast cleaning or pickling. (SSPC-SP10 or SSPC-SP8) e. Butt-joint welds subject to secondary stress where thickness is greater than 3/8 inch shall have complete joint penetration welds. f. Radiographic tests will be required and the film shall become property of the County. g. Protective Coatings: 1. Surface preparation for both inside and outside shall be in accordance with SSPC-SP10. (Steel Structures Painting Council - Surface Preparation 10) 2. First anniversary inspection in compliance with AWWA D102 will be required. 3. Outside Paint System: Aliphatic Polyurethane 5.5 to 8.0 total dry mils. The outside paint shall be either Tnemec 70/71-3, Pennsbury Coatings, Water Tank System No. 10 or equal as approved by the Utility Director. 4. Inside Paint System: Polyamide, 7.0 to 11. inside paint shall be (Poto-Pox), Pennsbury build Epoxy System or the Director. Two Coat Epoxy 0 total dry mils. The either Tnemec 20-1 Coatings, 2 coat high equal as approved by 21 5. Paint Color shall be as selected by the Utility Director from the manufacturers available colors. 3. Supplemental Information to AWWA D103. a. Tank Bottom: Concrete slab and steel base setting ring is required. b. Full 5 year manufacturers warranty on factory coating is required. 4. The following accessories, in addition to those required by either AWWA D100 or AWWA D103, shall be provided and installed. 1. Exterior safety cage, rest platform and roof ladder, handrails to accessories in conformance with OSHA. A fall prevention system which complies with applicable OSHA regulations is acceptable as a substitute for the cage and rest platform. 2. Overflow to ground, 1000 GPM minimum, located near roof opening. Provide coarse screen and concrete splash pad and erosion protected channel from overflow to drainage system or natural channel. 3. Screen vent against insects, provide special vent to insure fail-safe operation in event insect screens frost over. 4. Removable silt stop. 5. Separate drain line to drainage system or natural channel with erosion protection. B. Disinfection of Water Storage Facilities. All water storage facilities shall be disinfected in accordance AWWA C652 latest edition, using the method selected by the Design Engineer. 110.00 WATER PUMP STATIONS: Water pump stations shall be designed and constructed to meet the Standards of the Virginia Department of Health, and in addition to meet the following: A. All pump stations shall be designed with three pumps, each capable of pumping 50~ of the peak day design flow. 22 B. Pump stations shall be controlled by pressure devices installed on a separate sensing line at the point of storage. For pump stations not located at the storage facilities, pump control information shall be transmitted to the pump station via telephone lines or radio transmission. C. Pump controllers shall include provisions for alternating plus backup control of pumps. D. Electrical Requirements: 1. Pumps 5 horsepower and above shall be 3~l. Where 3p is available, pumps larger than 3 horsepower shall be 3~! . 2. Three phase pumps shall have phase protection on individual phases which also protect when running, as manufactured by Square D, Al1en- Bradley or equal as approved by the Utility Director. 3. Three phase pumps shall each have an individual poly-phase starter. 4. All pumps shall be controlled by starters and shall have individual HOA switches. 5. Starters shall be sized one size larger than horsepower required. Heaters shall be sized for actual current load. 6. All control circuits shall be 120 volt. 7. Electrical service shall be provided with lightening arrestors. 8. Electrical panel shall have a minimum of 20 circuits. 9. All electrical wiring shall be placed in conduit. 10. Water pump stations shall be considered a wet location for interpretation of the National Electric Code requirements. 11. All receptacles and switches shall have a minimum 20 amp rating. 12. At least two 20 amp GFI circuits shall be provided . 23 13. All electrical equipment and panels shall be manufactured units with UL listing and. shall include the manufacturers warranty. E. Hour run meters shall be required for each pump motor. F. Master Water Meter. G. All pu~ip stations installed above ground shall be of mas?nary construction with masonary or frame roof. Exterior shall be brick faced or washed pebble and shall have prefinished facia, soffit and trim. Pre-hung insulated steel doors with minimum size 3-0 x 6-8 shall be used. H. Pump houses shall have adequate insulation to pro- tect equipment and reduce heating cost. I. Adequate lighting, heating, ventilation, and drainage shall be provided for pump stations. J. Below or in-ground pump stations may be approved by the Utility Director for special application on an individual basis. Such approval will only be given when such design meets all the above requirements and adequate provisions are provided for the p.evention of flooding, safe working conditions, efficient access system and adequate area for maintenance and operation of the pump station. K. The minimum size structures to house a pump station shall be 8 foot by 10 foot by 8 foot high. L. All pump stations shall comply with applicable BOCA Codes and applicable county permits shall be secured. 24 Iy ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 10, 1987 SUBJECT: Spring Hollow Federal Permit Status COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The County recently received notice from the Army Corps of_ Engineers, after their meeting with State and Federal environmentalists, that our latest proposal was "biologically unacceptable." Although we have not received official written notice, we do expect a response by the last of March that will indicate the same conclusion. The next step in the permitting process will be a review by Colonel Boyd, the Norfolk District Engineer, to determine if the biological concerns outweigh the economic, social, and general welfare benefits of the project. Roanoke County has requested a meeting with Colonel Boyd to discuss his views prior to his rendering a final decision. Prior to meeting with Colonel Boyd, the staff suggests a series of meetings with our Federal and State representatives to discuss the latest developments and -the County's course of action. At your concurrence and direction, the staff will begin scheduling a meeting with our state delegation and federal representatives. SUBMITTED BY: ohn R. Hubbard, P.E. Assistant County Administrator of Public Facilities APPROVED: /, r°~ Elmer C.~ Ho ge County Administrator ~. G1 M ~ Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by: ACTION VOTE Brittle Garrett Johnson McGraw Nickens No Ye s Ab s ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER IN ROANOKE, VA, ON TUESDAY, MARCH 10, 1987 MEETING DATE: March 10, 1987 SUBJECT: Discussion of the proposed tax rate for 1987 and the budget process. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: At the Board of Supervisor's meeting on Tuesday, March 10, 1987, staff will discuss the proposed tax rates for real estate, personal property and machinery and tools for the 1987 tax year. Staff will also review the remainder of the budget process and budget calendar, including the scheduling of public hearings and the required legal advertisements. Printed materials for your consideration will be handed out at the meeting. RECOMMENDATION: SUBMITTED BY: ohn M. Chambl ss, Jr. Assistant County Administrator Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ------------------------------------------------------------ ACTION VOTE Approved ( M t' b No Yes Abs Denied Received Referred To o ion y. Brittle Garrett Johnson McGraw Nickens o -- y ZONING ORDINANCE DEVELOPMENT DISCUSSION MATERIALS CONTENTS ZONING ORDINANCE DEVELOPMENT OPTIONS .....................'..... 1 ALTERNATIVE METHODS ........................................... 2 PROJECT ACTIVITIES ............................................ 4 COMPONENTS REQUIRED TO PREPARE ZONING MAP ..................... 5 RELATION OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED ZONING DISTRICTS TO THE LAND USE PLAN .............................. 6 REGULATORY STRATEGIES FROM THE LAND USE PLAN .................. 7 o~ H Q H H Q O O H H N 0 z H H ~ ~ N H U U 3 ~~ H W ~ ~ Ha ~~ H ~ Q a~ 8~ 1- a C ~rn ~~ x ~ yJ ro ~ ~~ -.i x m 1-1 ~ ..22SS11~i H s rn ~r x x b x~, ~ s ~~ ~ ~ v ~ ~ ~° ' ~~ zo ~ H H H H H H ALTERNATIVE METHODS TO DEVELOP NEW PERFORMANCE-ORIENTED TEXT AND MAP OR MODIFY EXISTING TEXT AND MAP 1. Contract out entire project to consultant with limited staff support and full citizen participation. Advantages: a. Very timely completion b. Frees staff for other projects/duties c. Community acceptance d. Continuity of personnel Disadvantages: a. Very high cost b. Possible incompatibility with Land Use Plan 2. Prepare project in-house with additional temporary staff, limited outside consultation, and full citizen participation. Advantages: a. Compatibility with Land Use Plan b. Community acceptance c. Somewhat timely completion Disadvantages• a. High cost b. Takes staff-away from other projects/duties c. Possible staff overturn 3. Split project between consultant (~) and existing staff (~) with full citizen participation. Advantages: a. Timely completion b.- Compatibility with Land Use Plan c. Community acceptance d. Continuity of personnel Disadvantages: a. High cost 4. Prepare project in-house with additional temporary staff and limited citizen participation. Advantages: a. Compatibility with Land Use Plan b. Somewhat timely completion c. Moderate cost Disadvantages: a. Lack of community acceptance (may delay adoption) b. Takes staff away from other projects/duties c. Possible staff overturn 5. Prepare project in-house with shift of duties of present staff and limited citizen participation. Advantages: a. Compatibility with Land Use Plan b. Moderately low cost c. No additional staff Disadvantages: a. Lack of community acceptance (may delay adoption) b. Takes staff away from other projects/duties c. Possible staff overturn d. Untimely completion PROJECT ACTIVITIES: ZONING ORDINANCE DEVELOPMENT 1. Draft zoning ordinance text. 2. Conduct first community meetings to explain background. 3. Complete consultant/legal review of draft zoning ordinance text. 4. Hold community symposium on performance zoning. 5. Land Use Management Advisory Committee reviews draft ordinance. 6. Development Framework Guide details 5 and 10 year urban service areas. 7. Geographic Information System completed. 8. Community Plans detail 5 year future land use designations for each community planning area. 9. Conduct second community meetings for review of zoning ordinance text and community plans. 10. Planning Commission reviews zoning ordinance text and community plans. ' 11. Land Use Management Advisory Committee reviews community plans. 12. Complete street classification plan. 13. Prepare draft zoning map. 14. Conduct third community meetings for review of zoning map. 15. Land Use Management Advisory Committee reviews zoning map. 16. Planning Commission reviews zoning map._ 17. Hear and adopt 5 and 10 year development framework guide. 18. Hear and adopt community plans. 19. Hear and adopt street classification plan. 20. Hear and adopt zoning text. 21. Hear and adopt zoning map. Planning Commission briefing monthly. Board of Supervisors briefing quarterly. ~~~~~ T,E1(T YR. Fi~AMEI~IGi~K ~ MAP , ZON/NCB MAD GI5 .~ YK. ~ COMMUNITY p~.4N MaP5 ~oMpau~,vTs ,~~vr,~o ro ~~,4,eE ,zo~tl~~ ~t•I.4P ,,~ RELATION OF EXISTING ZONING DISTRICTS TO THE LAND USE PLAN Land Use Plan Designation Rural Preserve Rural Village Village Center Neighborhood Conservation Development Transition Core Principal Industrial Corresponding Zoning Classification None None A-1, R-E R-1 R-1,R-2,R-3,R-MH,R-5,R-6, B-1,B-2,B-3 R-2, R-3, R-MH, R-5, R-6, B-1, B-2, B-3 R-3, R-5, R-6, B-1, B-2, B-3 B-2, B-3, M-1, M-2, M-3 RELATION OF PROPOSED ZONING DISTRICTS TO THE LAND USE PLAN Land Use Plan Designation Corresponding Zoning Classification RURAL RURAL Rural Preserve A-1 Rural Preserve District Rural Village A-2 Rural Village District Village Center A-3 Village Center District None- A-4 Rural Employment Center District RURAL HOLDING RURAL HOLDING None A-5 Rural Residential Reserve District URBAN URBAN Neighborhood Conservation R-1 Neighborhood Conservation Development R-2 Residential Community Development Transition B-1 Buffer & Highway Transition District Core B-2 Core District None B-3 Interchange District Principal Industrial M-1 Urban Employment Center District REGULATORY STRATEGIES STATUS OF REGULATORY PROGRA1b1S The zoning ordinance is the primary tool for implementing the land use plan. Ideally, the zoning map follows the future land use map of the plan, and the zoning standards for land use and development follow tt}e policies of the plan. A planning theory is that the desired' pattern of land use and development promoted by the plan can be t>~ansformed into the zoning ordinance. Over time, the planning and zoning process will cause development and redevelopment to mesh with the plan and zoning maps, and the standards of that development will conform with the policies and standards of the plan and zoning ordinance text. In practice, however, zoning is rarely based on a plan. Few zoning ordinances were ever prepared on the basis of a comprehensive plan, and Roanoke County's existing ordinance is no exception. The County's existing ordinance was developed without the benefit of a comprehensive plan and predates this plan. This recent sequence of zoning without planning is shown in the following chronological listing of major planning and zoning events in Roanoke County:' TABLE III. CHRONOLOGY OF PLANNING AND ZONING EVENTS DATE EVENT 1939 PLANNING COMMISSION ESTABLISHED - 1939 FIRST SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE ADOPTED 194Q FIRST COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ADOPTED 1941- "FIRST ZONING ORDINANCE ADOPTED 1960 EXISTING ZONING ORDINANCE AND ZONING MAP ADOPTED 1970 MAJOR REVISION OF ZONING ORDINANCE TEXT AND COUNTY-WIDE RECLASSIFICATION OF ZONING MAP 1974 ADOPTION OF SECOND COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 1976 AMENDMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND DRAFTING OF NEW ZONING ORDINANCE 1977 NEW ZONING ORDINANCE FAILS ADOPTION 1985 GENERAL REWRITE AND CLARIFICATION OF EXISTING ZONING ORDINANCE 1985 ADOPTION OF NEW COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ./~' The County's existing zoning districts are a conventional type-- districts are arranged by specific land use type (agricultural, commercial, residential) and performance standards for development are for the most part minimal. The ordinance relies on separatiion of land uses into distinct districts and mostly bulk and density standards to control development. (Recently, however, the ordinance has added some new performance standards for signs, screening and buffering, and manufactured housing). The existing classifications are as follows: TABLE IV. EXISTING ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATIONS CLASS DISTRICT A-1 AGRICULTURAL R-E RESIDENTIAL ESTATES R-1 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL R-2 DUPLEX RESIDENTIAL R-3 MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL R-MH MANUFACTURED HOUSING R-5 TOWNHOUSE R-6 MULTIFAMILY CONDOMINIUM B-1 OFFICE B-2 GENERAL COMMERCIAL B-3 SPECIAL COMMERCIAL M-1 LIGHT INDUSTRIAL M-2 GENERAL 1NDUSTR[AL M-3 SPECIAL INDUSTRIAL The continuation of the existing zoning ordinance as a primary tool to implement the Land Use Plan would be difficult. Foremost among the difficulties is the contradicting land use principles of the Land Use Plan and the existing zoning ordinance. The County's new Land Use Plan is not conventional. This plan does not follow the traditional division or separation of land uses by specific type (agricultural, residential, commercial, and industrial); it encourages mixed used development subject to performance guidelines. Second, the existing ordinance requires multiple districting to achieve the mixed land use concepts of the plan, and has minimal safeguards to protect adjacent dissimilar land uses. The following table shows the lack of relationship of the Land Use Plan designations to the existing zoning district classifications. ~_ TABLE V. RELATION OF EXISTING ZONING DISTRICTS TO THE LAND USE PLAN LAND USE PLAN DESIGNATION RURAL PRESERVE RURAL VILLAGE VILLAGE CENTER NEIGHBORHOOD CONSERVATION DEVELOPMENT TRANSITION CORE PRINCIPAL INDUSTRIAL CORRESPONDING ZONING CLASSlFlCATlON NONE NONE A-1, R-E R-1 R-1, R-2, R-3, R-MH, R-S, R-6, B-I, B•2, B-3 R-2, R-3. R•MH, R-S. R-6, B-1, B-2, B-3 R-3, R-S, R-6, B-1, B-2, 8-3 B•2, B-3, M-I, M-2, M-3 Although the existing zoning ordinance bears little relation to the Land Use Plan, it has many positive characteristics. Among the positive characteristics are the following: 1. It is well known by the community. 2. It is traditional and has been in use for several decades. 3. It fosters public participation. _ 4. It is streamlined. 5. It is easy to understand. 6. It meets the State's legal requirements. The negative aspects of the existing ordinance are noted here: 1. It is inflexible. 2. It is outdated". 3. It fails to direct the location of growth. 4. It offers little protection from incompatible land developments. 5. It has overly-detailed district classifications. 6. It has been cut-and-pasted through amendments over the years. A new zoning ordinance could correct most of, the negative aspects of the existing zoning ordinance yet maintain most of its positive characteristics. And most importantly, the County could prepare a zoning ordinance based on the adopted principles of the Land Use Plan. One potential method of zoning that would be based directly upon the Land Use Plan is performance zoning. Since its origination over 15 years ;ago in Bucks County, Pennsylvania, performance zoning has gained popularity throughout the country. Performance zoning distric is divide the community by character of desired land development (e.g., rural preserve vs. urban core) rather than by specific land use groups (e.g., agricultural vs. commercial). The districts are usually less in number than conventional districts as a result of permitting dissimilar uses (e.g., residential and commercial) within the same district. Performance criteria limit density, floor area, lot coverage, open space, screening, landscaping, access, signage, etc., to maintain compatibility of land development. These performance criteria adjust according to natural constraints unique to each parcel, thus protecting valuable resources (e.g., permitted density of a steeply-sloped parcel would be less than a gently-sloped parcel). Performance zoning is flexible, encouraging creative lan8 use planning and site design, yet is protective against disharmonious land development by applying strict performance criteria. In contrast to the existing conventional district classifications,:new performance district classifications would be consistent with the mixed land use principles of the Land Use Plan. Sample performance district classifications based upon the Land Use Plan are shown on the following table: `" "TABLE V[. SAMPLE PERFORMANCE DISTRICT CLASSIFICATIONS BASED UPON THE LAND U3E-PLAN CLASS AP "'a VR a VC A( DR RC RD a BT NC CC P[ DISTRICT AGRICULTURAL AND FORESTAL PRESERVE VILLAAGE RESIDENTIAL VILLAGE CORE AGRICULTURAL INDUSTRY DEVELOPMENT RESERVE ' RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD CONSERVATION RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT BUFFER AND HIGHWAY TRANSITION NEIGHBORHOOD AND CORE COMMUNITY CORE PRINCIPAL INDUSTRIAL The direct relationship of-the sample performance districts to the Land Use Plan i~s.shown in the following table: TABLE VII. RELATION OF SAMPLE PERFORMANCE DISTRICTS TO THE LAND USE PLAN LAND USE PLAN DESIGNATION ~ RURAL PRESERVE RURAL VILLAGE a VILLAGE CENTER NEIGHBORHOOD CONSERVATION DEVELOPMENT z ~ y TRANSITION a ~ CORE PRINCIPAL INDUSTRIAL CORRESPONDING ZONING CLASSIFICATION AP VR VC. AI NC DRS RD BT NCB CC PI Of equal importance to the zoning ordinance is the capability of two related sets of development regulations to implement the Land Use Plan: the subdivision regulations and the design and construction standards. All of these are interdependent ordinances which relate directly to the goals and policies of the plan. Subdivision regulations have existed in the County since 1939. However, the County has never adopted a set of design and construction standards. Instead, the County relies on the State's provisions for public streets and erosion and sedimentation control. Other site engineering considerations are based upon good judgment of the County's staff engineers. In recent years, a committee was formed to prepare a comprehensive set of design and construction standards. The committee's efforts parallel those of the Land Use Management Advisory Committee. Once these interdependent efforts are finished, a new effort to combine all land development regulations could follow. Figure III shows this concept of unifying all land development regulations into a comprehensive development code. FIGURE III. UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS ZONING ORDINANCE SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS DESIGN 8t CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS _ COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT CODE REGULATORY PROGRAM RECOMMENDATIONS The County should take the following actions to implement the Land Use Plan: 1. Zoning Ordinance. a. Prepare a modified performance zoning ordinance that reflects the goals and policies of the "Development Framework Guide," the "Future Land Use Guide," and the "Resource Protection Guide" of the Land Use Plan. b. Give reasonable consideration to the Land Use Plan maps for the "Year 2003 Development Framework Guide," "Future Land Use Guide," and "Resource Protection Guide," in preparing new zoning maps for the ordinance. c. Characterize the new zoning ordinance by the following guidelines: Be flexible and dynamic. Be equitable. Be brief and easy to understand. Be enforceable. Be easily administered. Be sensitive to the cost effects of regulation. Keep districts to a minimum. Provide for public hearings on major land use changes.' Be streamlined to avoid costly development review delays. Be current, monitored, amended, and evaluated in its entirety at least every five years, in cycle with the major update of the comprehensive plan. d. Include the following statement of intent in the new zoning ordinance: Roanoke County's geography requires careful planning and efficient land use management. In view of this, primary considerations of the new zoning ordinance will be to implement the Land Use Plan and provide practical, predictable, equitable and simple solutions which minimize or eliminate the conflicts promoted by the County's existing zoning ordinance. Likewise, local residents' concerns are a primary consideration of the zoning ordinance. By their very nature, zoning cases force a confrontation between landowners and the public interest, or landowners against each other. The existing zoning ordinance has regularly forced a "winner-take-all" solution to zoning conflicts. For instance, whenever a rezoning has encountered objections, the Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors have had two choices-- either to permit the rezoning to the alleged detriment of the objectors or to prohibit the rezoning to the objection of the landowner or developer who proposed it. If the rezoning permits a use or activity, surrounding landowners have little protection from any of the negative impacts unless zoning conditions are proffered by the petitioner. The ordinance has few protective performance criteria to assure compatibility among adjacent properties. Accordingly, a new zoning ordinance should be developed with substantial efforts given to finding equitable solutions to recognized and potential conflicts which zoning cases might cause. A modified performance zoning ordinance can provide more equitable provisions based upon the Land Use Plan. This new zoning ordinance should be prepared according to the following guidelines: The ordinance shall clearly distinguish among zoning districts, based upon the intent of the Land Use Plan designations and other reasonable considerations. Zoning districts shall be as few in number as possible, each with a clearly different purpose. Zoning districts shall direct development to those areas capable of being adequately served by public utilities and road networks. Zoning districts shall be planned to handle long-term needs. Zoning districts shall permit by right as many potentially compatible uses as possible, .subject to performance criteria. Performance criteria shall protect the community's general welfare and assure compatibility of land use. Performance criteria shall be designed to provide a range of choices, flexibility, and options for development. Performance criteria shall be objective standards, easily administered by County staff. The ordinance shall contain provisions for its regular review and update. e. Carry out the following activities in preparing the new zoning ordinance: Hold a valley-wide symposium on the merits of performance zoning, led by a prominent planning consultant. Hold community meetings throughout the County to inform the public and invite participation. Meet with civic, professional, and trade associations in the Roanoke Valley to inform and invite their participation. Disseminate information through printed and audio-visual means to inform the public. Reserve a staff planner full-time to coordinate the project. Hire a part-time planning consultant to support. the staff planner. Use staff, research, information, and space resources of the Fifth Planning District Commission. Complete the County's computerized Geographic Information System (GIS) as the primary tool to prepare new zoning maps. Provide periodic progress reports from the Land Use Management Advisory Committee to .the Planning Commission and in turn to the Board of Supervisors. 2..Subdivision Ordinance. Prepare a new subdivision ordinance. 3. Comprehensive Development Code. Once the new zoning and subdivision ordinances are prepared, combine-them with the design and construction standards into a unified comprehensive development code. 4. Property Maintenance Code. Evaluate the effectiveness of the County s exfsting property maintenance code and amend as necessary. 1 ALL BINGO APPLICANTS MUST ANSWER QUESTIONS 20 - 27 BEFORE NOTARIZATION RAFFLE APPLICANTS, GO TO NOTARIZATION. 20. Does your organization understand that the bingo games shall not be conducted more frequently than two calendar days in any calendar week? 21. Does your organization understand that it is required to keep complete records of the bingo game. These records based on X18.2- 340.6 of the Code of Virginia and X4.98 of Roanoke County Code must include the following: a. A record of the date, quantity, and card value of instant bingo supplies purchased, as well as the name and address of the supplier of such instant bingo supplies, and written invoice or receipt is also required for each purchase of in- stant bingo supplies? b. A record in writing of the dates on which Bingo is played, the number of people in attendance on each date, and the amount of receipts and prizes on each day? (These records must be retained for three years.) c. A record of the name and address of each individual to whom a door prize, regular or special Bingo game prize or jackpot from the playing of Bingo is awarded? d. A complete and itemized record of all receipts and disburse- ments which support, and that agree with, the quarterly and annual reports required to be filed, and that these records must be maintained in reasonable order to permit audit? 22. Does your organization be conducted at such time as and only at such locations this application? 23. Does your organization understand that the gross receipts in the course of a reporting year from the playing of instant Bingo may not exceed 33 1/3$ of the gross receipts of an organization's Bingo operation? 24. Does your organization understand it may not sell an instant Bingo card to an individual below sixteen years of age? 25. Does your organization understand that an organization whose gross receipts from all bingo operations that exceed or are ex- pected to exceed $75,000 in any calendar year shall have been granted tax-exempt status pursuant to Section 501 C of the United States Internal Revenue Service? (Certificate must be attached.) understand that instant Bingo may only regular Bingo game is in progress, and at such times as are specified in 6 r, x . Y - ~~ , ~ I ~o D ~v t y-® M ..c ~ r O• ~w® ~ '~O ~ ~ ~ i c DOO Z. ~ ~ <orn ~ ~o m ~ i ~ _ x Tx ~~ d ~p(D ~ C N •'•~ ~ ~ ~ ° N W mvs ~ r rn.~ ~ Fa ~ N • ~ N H ~ t ~ O ~ r = ~ C ~ t < D ~ ? ~ c D ` ~ ~`DS ~ fl O U~ hv ~ :: m N m ~ ~ ~ n O p ~ g ~ s v D 7 OD pp ~ m W O ~ • O` Y `< ~ eo ~ O M ,...... ~. N ~ -. ~l O i m m O da m ~ m ao O ~ ~ ~"~ ~~ O O A ~ O D • ~ y > ~ aZr 1V D -i 3 ~G Tk7f vN m3 v «-~ D o p °t. °ow ~D a ~ O ~ ~O 3r c~ ~~ m 2 • ~ z.p m 3~1 °• ° 1 rn N c0 ~^ 3 ~ . ~N ^N 1 ~ _,..,. f x ~ o m o o.o m~ ~^ m m r or ~. z 3 pp O ~'N ~ ~ ~ r ~c l m I -~ .O ~ L O Z ~ OD C ~, N c ~O ~1 O 2 x ~1 3 O ! o m ~ m 1 ~ 3 ~ a1 D Q O O f m ty ~ . Z fl 3 r - - r ~ ~ ~ ~v oo ~c- mo" VI ~1 i rn w m° 0'o r }. ~ oo O N + D ° t X m Ica p. _m~~ gym- m v ~m~ m 3 m c r C a X m m N m m O m m m C m i. a m L C l0 L m L O N C ~o d m E 0 N a I~ y {~ ~W N l0 C 0 U ~' v (W 7 I° r --- ,,,. i . ~aR~~ Ja~~ Q. +~-{~-eRSo~ /~C.Cou ~1`E`A r~1 I i.J~~~E~p ~ ~ S / (J CC.ou ,U'~ ~ J~ U I'+~ S~ 3 ~~ ~~ .~ ,• L~ ~. _} C_, ~~° Yk:ti~ .,f. ~GI ~ C~,~ +.136 ~~ ~IZv~U's~~` ~~ Vl~t ~G/J ( ~ 1~ ~ \ ,~ -~ f-~PR~~ 3,~a8- ((~~ BOTETOURT JAYCEES ~LC~1W~ci~, ~~~ CONSTITUTION, BY-LAWS & POLICY CONSTITUTION ARTICLE I NAME SECTION 1: The name of the organization shall be the Botetourt Jaycees. SECTION 2: The principal office of this organization shall be located at Carter, Roe, Emick and Honts' Law Offices, Fincastle, Virginia. -, ~, ARTICLE II AFFILIATION SECTION 1: This organization shall be and hereby is affiliated with the Virginia Jaycees, the United States Jaycees, and Jaycees International and is subject to the Constitution and By-laws of these bodies insofar as they affect and prescribe the functions of local Jaycee chapter and are not in conflict with this Constitution. ARTICLE III PURPOSE SECTION 1: The purpose of this organization shall be: ~d A: Civic service through the organized efforts of t#e-young the community to promote the welfare of the community and its citizens through actin ru tive projects, and B: To provide itibe young rai ng in leadership and to install civic consciousness to better their usefulness as citizens. ~,~ l_ ~~ ARTICLE IV MEMBERSHIP SECTION 1: Any young ~ of good character between the ages of eighteen (18) and thirty-five (35), both inclusive, is eligible for active membership in this organization with full privileges thereof. ARTICLE V GOVERNMENT SECTION 1: The government of this organization shall be vested in a Board of Directors consisting of the officers, immediate past president, all members who are state officers and not more than nine ~o-t~he~~~~~ members. ~ aid offi er~ s~.h~ll~he resident dent, y~~ President, ~ Secretary and Treasurer. Said state officers shall be ex-officio members. SECTION 2: The officers and directors shall be elected in the manner pre- scribed by the By-Laws and shall hold office for a period of one year, or until their successors are duly elected and charged. ARTICLE VI AMENDMENT SECTION 1: This Constitution may be amended by a two-thirds vote of the members present at any regular or special meeting provided that written notice of the proposed amendment has been mailed to the ~~ last known address of each member at least ten days prior to the date of such meeting. ~.cQ.o d.a~ ~2a..1~. fie. ~ ~7~z_o-nt~~ ,~ix~ C~i~Cly y~2.Pin the, L ,~ ,t1~ ~~ G~~ ~~a a~ . _ ~~~ o~ .~~ e.~Qr~u~a~;te-nJ ,CuLa11-~ -~e- Ct~c.~.cc.~x~. ~~ ~-~ c~v ~, ,cam ate. ~:u.~th ~h.~. ~ . ,d . `~ - ~0-cup, ~~a~So~> ~~~a~ . ~!~ ~.~~~ ~ BY LAWS ARTICLE I MEMBERSHIP -~ SECTION 1: Active membership in this organization shall be as provided n _ ,the constitution. SECTION 2: AnyAf good character less than eighteen (18) and more than thirty-five (35) shall be eligible for Associate membership in this organization. An Associate member shall not be eligible to vote or hold office. „~~~~~~ _ SECTION 3:'. Honorary membership may be conferred upon any,.~an of good character by a two-thirds (2/3) vote of the membership. Said honorary membership shall be for one (1) year unless specified, but shall not permit voting or office-holding privileges. - SECTION 4: All applications for membership must be in writing and sponsored by a member in good standing. Applications must be accepted ~- by a majority vote of the board of directors. _ SECTION 5: Active membership shall cease on the 31st day of May next following the 36th birthday of a member. _ ARTICLE II DUES SECTION 1:--Th ann es for members of this organization shall be ~~ _. ~~~~y dollars, paid c~~~ Total amount shall be payable on or before May 1 each year. New membersshall pay dues prorate in advance to the next due date occurring at least three months hence. SECTION 2: The annual dues for Chapter Associate members shall be ten ($10) __ dollars. Total amount is payable on or before June 1 each year. ARTICLE III GOVERNMENT _ "SECTION 1: The government of this organization shall be vested in the Board of Directors, which shall be subject to the will of the membership. SECTION 2: The Board Of Directors shall have control and management of the property and management of the organization, subject to the will of the membership. Funds of the organization shall be withdrawn from the bank with which they are on deposit by the joint _ signature fo the President, T^+^'^^,' "~ ^^ °res~c-ie.n.~, and or the Treasurer . .Chav~rnam ~ ~- ~40~_ _ SECTION 3: The members of the board of directors, (those who are neither officers nor ex-officio members) sha7J~ be elected according to the number of active members.T~ ( members shall be elected if the active membership is fifty (50) or less. One additional member shall be elected for each twenty-five (25) or fraction -- thereafter to a maximun of nine (9) members. A vacancy shall be filled only if the number of active members qualifies that the -- vacancy exists. _ SECTION 4: ~~vacancy on the board of directors, or in any office, shall be filled by vote of the board of directors.- Such appointee to ._ serve until the next regular election. ~~",, GL2~¢J ~ 1~ ,~~t.c~t,ait~ (v ; (~ ~`.iz~.. Ct rxr~c.c,c.Q,Q. ~ ~lc.Q~ ,Qha,Q11. ~ ~L.¢.c~ a man~.a. ~~r~~n.,t ~'~.u-~Q eyo nwn.~. -~,cR. , ,(1x.. ~ ~ a1zu~.o ~onwrc.~ ~(,c.~.c~, z, z, , oCo~cQ.Qo~mc..rrnc~ ~C~-~r~. ~ a x~uh.a~~ ain-oC Q ,Qa GZ2~~ ~ ~.2~J, ~ ~ ~~~Q~~ . ~ ~ G!~~.cL~ J1T, ~ 3 Ana ~ ,cLV~,~~n ,df~a~ c~ _rn~~. ~~f~ . l .,d~.-c7,c-a~'c, ~, l 1_ _ j - SECTION 1: ARTICLE IV ELECTIONS Not less than thirty (30) days prior to the annual election { , the President shall appoint, with the approval of the board of - ;. SECTION 2: directors, a nominating committee of not less than five (5) members. The nominating committee sha77 decide u th pon e names of candidates for election and shall make written recommendations to the members ~- SECTION 3: not less than ten (10) days prior to the annual election. No member of the nominating committee shall be eligible to an y office by action of the nominating committee __ SECTION 4: ~ . The nominating committee shall elect nominees for each expiring ~ ~~ directorship and officership to serve for one year. No officer shall be eligible to th SECTION 5: e same office for two (2) consecutive terms. Additional names may be placed in nomination at the time of j balloting; provided eight (8) members or ten (10) percent of th e members of the organization, which ever is greater, sign a SECTION 6: pe ion requesting another name to be added. At the annual election, there shall be elected a President,State Director , Internal Vice president, External Vice President, 4Jays and Means Vice President,Treasurer, and Secretary in order; all of whom shall constitute -the officier of tt~e organization. To complete -the Board of Directors, there shall be elected directors as required in Article III, Section 3. ,SECTION 7: Voting shall be by individuals, and no person shall cast more than one ballot. P,bsentee ballots will be recognized if received ten (10) days prior to the election. SECTION 8: Any member with dues in arrears of more than sixty (60) days SECTION 9: , will not be able to vote in the elections or run for any office. Officers and directors sha77 take office June 1, which date shall begin this organizations fiscal year. ARTICLE V MEETINGS ,~ SECTION 1: The annual election meeting sha77 be held in P4a-y of each year , and notice of such meeting shall be mailed to each member at SECTION 2; his last known address at least ten (10) days prior thereto. The organization sha77 hold a business meeting at least once a month. Business may be conducted and will be considered ratified and approved by an affirmative vote of the majority of members tit present who are qualified to t d th' vo e an ~s shall constitute a quorum at any regular meeting. SECTION 3: Meetings of the board of directors sha77 be held at prearranged dates or at the call of the President. At all meetings of the board of directors e majority sha77 constitute a quorum. SECTION 4: Special Meetings of the membership or the board of directors shall be called by the President or by the Secretary at the request of at least four (4) directors. - ARTICLE VI DUTIES OF OFFICERS ! SECTION 1: ' The President, as chief officer of the organization, shall supervise ~ the organization's affairs and activities and shall mak an n ual report to the members. He shall be the organization's eprese ative SECTION 2: on the Board of Dbrect rs of the Virginia Jaycees. Th~''1~~;'-er~a-1 mi . ce rest n w o shall preside at membership and -. board of directors meetings in the absence of the President, shall also work with the President on such ip.~e~+~l affair$ as membership, S finances , and publ i c relations . y `~ ~ ~,,~,~ ECTION 3: •The External Vice President shall work with the President on external _. SECTION 4: affairs of the organization including project and committee activities. The Wa s and M Vi y eans ce President sha77 work with the President -- on all money making proaects of the organization. ,~ - ~ 1 ~c~z.c~.~~ru 3 ~-/2.e., ~~:c~u.-a~ ~C~-~fLopmc~rc~ a~n.aC, . ...C~»v»UUr~u~, o~P:G~~Qo,Qi,-x~,-,cam ~-(~,c¢, ~ ~o ~ha.~~ ~~le, u,~ ~ m'1 ,QU.d~ a~ a.~i~A .~--~ ~ ,o.~.~.~o-na.~ ~C.r~cu~.~,o~-~~-~, a~ ..,~.- . ~ ~m ~~~ ~u.~P1~, p~c.cCa~ ,ux. ~cQ. a~~cQ. ~ ~z~.. . a.l,~.-~--~,~.e. n-x~~z:c,~,-L.~aC, ~~~,`,c~`~ . ,arc ~ ~rr~ .z~~, ~~A.z.d. C~~ Ylll - ~crnvr~u~~d ,dkc~.er~ 3.' .the p~~darn~, amd Ltfav2ep/c.cat~ -Ucc~. pitQ.oidanc~d ,oha_Q.Q. 1~¢. ~ -4~i.c~s- -1Y~Pir~G2n.° t~ Q~f~ ~Ce~vnutteco J SECTION 5: The Secretary shall give notice of all regular and special meetings (~ and shall keep a permanent record of the minutes of such meetings. He shall be custodian of all official records of the organization. SECTION 6: The Treasurer shall issue notices of dues payable and be responsible ~_, for they collec ion thereof, keep the books of the organization , disburse funds as and shall report monthly on the financial condid~on of the organization. He shall prepare a report for audit by his successor. I. ~RTI~ II COMMIL2 Y// ~; SECTION 1: The board of directors shall determine the committees deemed proper and necessary to fulfill the object and purpose of the organization. SECTION 2: All committee chairmen shall be appointed by the President subject to the approval of the board of directors. -J SECTION 3: The President and th e External Vice President or Internal Vice , President shall be ex-officis members of all committees. ~- ARTICLE AUTHORITY TO BIND SECTION 1: No member of this organization shall contract for or incur any __debt or enter into any agreement or other~•~ise obligate this organization except by authorization of the board of directors or the membership; ARTICLE ~X RULES OF ORDER SECTION 1: Roberts Rules Of Order shall govern the proceedings of a71 meetings of the organization and is constituent parts except as provided in these By- Laws. ARTICLE XI DELEGATIONS SECTION 1: Delegations or special committees shall be appointed by the President subject to the approval of the board of directors, to represent the organization at any convention, meeting, or assembly as may be necessary. Such delegations or committees shall exercise only those powers specifically vested in them by the board of directors. ARTICLE ~L~ REh10VAL FROM OFFICE SECTION 1: Any officer or director may be removed from office as a result of failure to fulfill the duties of said office or for conduct i- detrimental to the best interests of the organization. Said removal must follow the following procedures: A. A petition stating the charge shall be filled with the secretary and signed by 2/3 of the board of directors or 2/3 of the ~-~ ~ active members. B. The Secretary shall notify each member at least twent 20) 9~~,a,(J days before the question wi 7 7 be placed on meeti ng agenda. ~-,t,~„~,,,Q,,,Q~.p C. Said officer or director shall be permitted written notice of the char e five days before the uestion is to be placed on anmeeti ng agen a ~"~ "'~'Y' "~' ~l D. The petitioners shall present their case first, said officer or director shall be heard second and the vote shall be taken third. Two-thirds of those voting shall be necessary to remove said officer or director from office . 0. ,'ux,rn n~x.z,~.ot ..L~.., ~ ~ a~ ' Should said officer be the secretary: the tree surer shall receive n'~' 1 and distribute the petition. Should said officer be the president J~,~~ e~,a-1 vice president shall preside during the removal pro- "~" ceeaings. No removal proceedings shall be ~aa-s~ed more than once on the same evidence. _ ~~ ARTICLE XIII PgLICY _ SECTION 1: A written Policy shall be~established which shall state the rules pertaining to the adoption of programs, duties of officers and directors and other matters of concern to the organization. ?~ 14~ ARTICLE XIII AMENDMENTS SECTION 1: -The By-Laws and Policies may be amended by a two-thirds vote of the members present at any general of special meeting, provided written notice of the proposed action has been given each member at his last known address at least ten (10) days prior thereto. t ~~v°.s~.i2~rw.r~~- 1x~~sr~ rat=r•.._~~.~ ~~tztZ Virginia Jaycees ID# Miller Park Square DAY Lynchburg, V~ "24~0~ SPO EMP < - ,. _ HPH BPH 845-7U69 z• 5asham, Mark ID# 228-7U-71U2 114b Halliahurst Ave BDY 1U/23/b5 Vinton, Va 24178 SF'0 EMP Winn Dixie HPH 345-769U Ef~'H 982-9725 Wessell, Eddie ID# 227-98-7774 5422 Cooper St BDY U5/U7/61 Roanoke; Va -24019 SPO EMp Di l 1 and Paper Co. HP'H 3b2-2274 _ DPH 34:s-5551 1 Bielawski, Britt ID# 23U-76-51b1 Fit i , Bova SUbD BDY U2/23l54 Daleville, Vii 24083. SPO EMP HPH 992-6425 HPH Blancard, Steve ID# 111 Cherr_ y Hi 11 Dr. BDY ic=x/23/58 Roanoke, Va 24U17 SPO ~ tCarei~ EMP Dana Corp. ~ HPH 982-U994 HPH 345-1521 Booker, Paul ID# 229-72-9?22 52ib Dradshaw LADY Salem, i!a ' X4153 SPO EMP Self` "" HPH X84-7461 SPH Eiooth, Donna ID# 529-98-2925 Rt 2 , Bova 1 ~ b ~ HDY Troutville, Va 24175 SPO Terry EMP'" HPH 992-269t> 8PH 345-1535 Booth, Terry ID# Rt 2, Box 2Ub BDY Troutville, Va 24175 8P0 Donna EMP HPH 992-269b 8PH 992-i1UU ~towman, Lanny ID# 913 Grove Lane BDY Roanoke, Va 24012 8P0 Donna EMP HPH 362-f3C~5 ~+PH Ecowyer, Aennis ID# 224-82-988 Ftt 5, Soh 128 BDY 10/14/b0~' Troutville, Va 24175 SPQ _, EMP ~ ~ ~ HP'H 992--3924 8PH Brown, Mi k:e ID# 14U5 Crestview Drive PDY 81 ack~burg, Va 24Qb~a SPO E~1P ~ ~ ~ HPH EXT EXT EXT EXT EX7 EXT EXT EXT EXT EXT ~' ~~~ .Bunn, Barrie ID# Rt 1~ Hox 598 BDY Troutville, Va 24175 9P0 Lois EMP HPH 992-3914 BPH 254-2t~ 11 E X T Burke, Rick ID# 227-9b-848 3307 Longhorn Rd BDY 01 / 13/'°r8 Roanoke, Va 24019 5P0 Sharon EMP Grand In'~eri drs HPH 772-3089 BPFi 774-85413 EXT Burrell, Melvin ID# 223-84-6589 General Delivery BDY 12/03/5b F'incastle, Va 24x90 SPO EMP Rke. Gas Go. HPH 473-566 BPH 344-6fs'51 EXT Campbell, Warren ID# 5711 Malvern Rd BDY Roanoke, Va 24012 SPO EMP Double Envelope HPH 366-7945 BPH 362-3311 EXT Chapman, Anita L. ID# 22b-98-010 1908 W. Raritan Rd BDY 12/21/60 Roanoke, Va 24012 SPO EMP Ithaca Industries ~ WPH 344-5327 BPH EXT Cox, Charles ID# 225-64-2345 4612 Sanders Drive BDY 05/17/46 Roanoke, Va 24n19 SPO Chyrl EMP Equitable Iris. Co. HPH 362-3069 BPH 362-1216 EX7 Co:<, Timmy ID# 223-90-1739 Rt 2, Box 138 BDY 03/21/b7 Troutville, Va 241'75 9P0 EMP HPH 992-3072 BPH EXT Cax, Tommy ID# 226-b8-9551 Rt li, Bax 175 A BDY 09/22/47 Roanoke, Va 24019 SPO Linda EMP Self HPH 992-3006 gPH EXT Cox, Jr., Charlie ID# 224-82-9405 4612 Sanders Drive BDY Ob/2C~/b~ Roanoke, Va 24019 SPO EMP Student HPH 36.2-3069 BPH EXT Craig, Joe ID# 505 Mason. Court Dr BDY Pearisburg, Va 24134 ~3P0 EMP HPH BP~1 E X't Greasy, Ray ID~# 2112 Caritel Road BDY Roanoke, Va 24018 SPO Bar'i5ara IMF' Sel f Attorney HF'H 999-#®00 M ~~~ s 9~~1 g X fi .Custer, Joan Rt 1, Lot 48 Viewlnd Christiansburg, Va 24()73 EMP Doss, Rick. 4915 Hildebrand Rd Roanoke, Va 24012 EMP Fewo>; , Winston 724 Stewart Ave Roanoke, Va 24013 EMF Kroger bakery Flint, Danny RR 1, Box 113 Fincastle, Va 24090 EMP N & S Railroad Flint, Mary Jane RR 1, Box 113 Fincastle, Va 24090 EMP Frye, Jack 736 West Main St. Salem, Va 24153 EMF' Garnett, PFC James R. 99th ORD.DET. BOX105 AFO, NY 09354 EMP U. S. ARMY Garnett, Randy Rt 1, Box 41b Daleville, Va 24083 EMP N & S Railroad Garst, Ben W. P O Bor. 508 Daleville, VA 24083 EMP Garst, Tim 5526 Littleton Rd Roanoke, Va 24012 EMP Telex Computer Pro. Gearhart, Tim bE?5 Heatherwood Dr. Boones Mill, Va 24065 ~N~P ID# BDY SPO HPH HFH ID# BDY SPO HPH 3b2-7286 BPH 774-7004 ID# 228-94-8731 BDY 07/16/58 SPG1 HPH 343-9413 BtPFI ID# 229-58-1809 BDY 04/23/46 SF'0 Mary Jane HPH 992-1827 BPH 981=-5:5fa2 ID# 223-84-5Sb4 HDY 04/17/54 SPO Danny HPH 991-1827 BPH ID# HDY SPO HPH 389-787! BPH 387-04bb ID# BDY SPO HPH BPH ID# 231-64=8789 BDY 12/31/47 SPO Joanne HPH 992-4538 HPH 981-4°573 ID# EDY HPO HPH 8PH ID# 229-b4=7428 HDY 01/18/57 SPO HPH 366-5041 HPH ID# 228=84=8114 EiDY '3P0 6o~tr } e l~~~ ~#=~~~~ ~~~ EXT EXT EXT EXT EXT EXT EXT EXT EXT EXT ~~fi ~ r Geiger, Jeff R. ID# 230-90-1U94 709 Drew Street 8DY 1~~/21/60 Roanoke, Va 24012 SPO EMP Rk.e Valley Cable HPH E+PH 982-1110 Graybill, Richard ID# P. O. Fio>; 175 BDY Troutville, Va 2417 SPO EMP N & S Railroad Hf'W 992-°1831 BPH 981-4287 Gross, Frank ID# 229-15-3562 303 18th St. SE bDY 05/11/65 Roanoke, Va 24013 SPO EMP Winn Dixie HPH 343-9139 EsPH 982-8725 Hager, Leslie ID# 538 Highland Ave EeDY Roanoke, Va 24016 SPO Robert EMP HF'H 982-2560 HPH Hager, Robert ID# 538 Highland Ave SDY Roanoke, Va 24016 SPO Leslie EMP ~ HPH 982-2560 BP`H Hall, Rick ID# 229-82-88b9 6942 Plantation Rd HDY 09/27/5v Roanoke, Va 24Q19 SPO Tracey EMF Southern States HPH 362-8101 HPH 992-1 1 007 Hankins, David ID# 223-25-3179 4614 Hazelridge Rd EDDY 0b/18/68 Roanoke, Va 24019 SPO EMP Grand Interiors HRH 362-2194 HPW 7'74-7004 Harrison, Mark ID# 225-94-2157 316 Houston Ave. BDY t:>8/24/bb Roanoke, Va 24012 HPH 3b2-9457 EMP $F'W Hodge, Mark ID# 228-04-7971 28'32 Embassy Dr EtDY 06/20/b0 Roanoke, Va 24x19 SF'0 EMP Valley Pue1 In.]ectio HPH -362-3177 &F'H 5+81-93'~b Hollingsworth, Harry ID# Rt ~ , Esax 101 EsDY SP® Hefty Roanoke, Va 24019 HPH 992-3189 EMP HPH ID# 228-bb-8332 Hollingsworth, Ran 8DY 09/ 16/`.50 P. D. Ego>; 5494 9P'0 Malady ~ioanok.e, Va 24412 HPH 992-39vb ~PSF' M ~~ S ~aa 1 r®ad EXT EXT EXT EXT EXT EXT EXT EXT EXT EXT Hollingswprth, Sam ID# 920 Grove Lane $DY Roanpk:e, Va 24012 HPH 3bbt4081 EMF' BPH EXT Hughes, Sam 3040 Callirn Raanok:e, Va EMP US Post ID# ~tgworth HDY 24012 SPA Office HPH 8PH 11/29/49 Theresa bb--5819 342-2764 EXT Jaycees, Camp Virginia ID# Att: Ev Waranetss BDY Blue Ridge, Va 240b4 SPO EMP HPH BPH 947-2972 EXT Jobe, Jeff ID# 1505 Narcissus St HAY Salem, Va 24133 SPO EMP HF'H 387-1693 BPH 389-5b00 EXT Johnson, Danny zD# .x+117 Oakl awn Ave BDY C~3/ 13/58 Roanoke, Va 24012 HPH 3bb-3817 EMP ~ EXT HPH 3b3-4981 Peggy M. ID# 22b-Ob-4454 Kegley' BDY 08/17/38 170 Pine Street SPO Vinton, Va 24179 MPH 34g-1795 EMP BPH EXT ID# Kirby, Tom J52r.J' Ambassador Dr ztDY RoanoE~e, Va 24019 SPO Lynn HPH 3bb-447b EMP HPH 342--1841 EXT Kreyiing, Caeey ID# 530-•36-94b5 Rt 2 Hox 44b HDY 01 /20/36 Fincat~tle, Va 241790 SF'0 EMP Self emplpyeed MPH 473-3b44 HPH EXT LaHiosa, Eddie ID# 223-08-8450 4610 Trevino Circle BDY it~l2b/61 Roanoke, Va 24019 9R0 NPH 5b3-382 EMP Self DPH 343-x400 EXT Lawhorn, Mike ID# 227-84-3864 Rt 1, Fox 506D HDY ~~1/19/57 Daleville, Va 24083 Mp'Fd 992-643 EMP BP'H EXT I D# 2:31-32^-791 Long , E~ev HDY 11 /25/42 ` RFD 1 , ~+v:: 8-A ue Ridge, Va 240b4 P~ SPO Shirley. , EI~F' F'rescr i pt i tin 5ht7ppe HPH ~~a 977-Ea 123 ~q~~=4~~51 ~~°~ ID# Looney, Monte BDY 1228 k:ef f i ei d Street SPO k:i tty Roanoke, Va 24C)i9 HPH 3bb-0965 EMP Valley Motor Sports BF'H 3bb-483 EXT ID# Loope, Bill BDY Rt 11, box 424 9P0 Mary Llee Ftoanok.e, Va 24~.~19 HPH 992-5212 EMP BPH EXT ID# Loope, Glynn BDY RoanaF~e, Va 24719 SPO . E~1P HPH 992-5212 BPH EXT McNei 11 , Davi d M. iD# 228-84--8384 BDY 1C>/C~5/b2 Rt 2 ~PQ Daleville, Va 24~~3 HPH 992-1343 EMP 8PM EXT ID# 229-58--1674 Milward, Fete BDY 11/11/46 Rt 2, Box 17bA SPCI k:athy Buchanan, Va 24Ubb HPH 254-24b9 EMP J. C. Bradford ~ F~PH 982-C~Q17 EXT Mowbray, Mike ID# 228-19-9055 2643 Dorchester Dr BDY D5/~~8/64 Roanoke, Va 24Q12 8PC1 EMP HPH 366-7819 PPM EXT Mullins, Glenn ID# 4596 Quarry Drive BDY Roanoke, Va 24U14 5P0 Pam EMP Appalachian Power HPH 342-2748 BPH EXT Page, Leigh ID# 224-02-8964 4c~4 Cedar Ave NW BDY 12!16/SQ Vinton, Va 24179 SPO EMP ~ancerlot HPH 982-5536 ExT BPH 981-C~2C~5 ID# 229-58-194H Patterson, Bob BDY C~8/C~7f45 Rt 1 , Box 155 SPA Julie Fincastle, Va 24u9~7 HPH 992-4C-bb EMP Self Attorney PPH 342-5.x157 EXT II?# 225-8Q-C-14C~ Pendleton, Gary E+DY Cy7/3C~/53 RR 1 , Box 268 SPO Angela Thaxton, Va 24174 HPH 94?~-2C1da~- EMP BP'M E ~~ ID# 227-b2-t)Q,~b Fool e, Mike DQY C~1/2~l55 4758 Penn. Ave. 5P0 Roanoke, Va 24Cf19 HPH 3bEa-~457a EMP Grand Interiors _. __ ~- _ _ i. I D# 228-31--9682 price , K:e l l y G. HDY 02/11/66 Rt w++, Bax 479A SF,O Trautville, Va 24175 HPH 977--9222 EMP HPH ID# 230-17-393b Rader, Sam bDY 11/25/65 2822 Burton Ave. SPO Roanoke, Va 24012 FiP'H 563-4b97 EMP BF'Fi Rhodes, Scott ID# 459-94-42501 BDY 11/24/51 1013 Howel l Drive Sp0 F'am Vinton, Va 24179 HF'H 8901-b995 EMP Lancerlot Sports HPw 981-020'5 ID# Sarver, Hunter E~D1l P. O. Etox 149 SPO Daleville, Va 24Q83 HPH 992-4868 EMP BPFi ID# 053-48-9929 Schenk, Kevin BDY 09/27/55 Rt 2 Box 378-A SPO F'am Vinton, Va 24179 HPH 890-3097 EMF' N & W 9PH 981--3033 Schmidt, Scott ID# bb29 Trevilian Road BDY Roanoke, Va 24019 SPO EMp HPH BPF~ Schrader, Ronald ID# 3228 Maplelawn Ave BDY Roanoke, Va 24412 SPO EMP HPH PPH 366--2415 Sheet. , br i an ID# BDY 5323 Darby Raad SPO Roanoke, Va 24012 HPH 5b3-5623 EMP HPH 985-2774 Smith, Charlie ID# BDY P . 0 . Ego>; 54 SPO Fincastle, Va 24090 HP`H 473-33t~8 EMP BF~'F~ 9'92=4343 Smith, Chris 59 Forest Hill Ave. F;oanoF;e, Va 240112 EMP Smith, Fred 215 Wildh~~rat Ave. Roanoke, Va 24012 EMP' N&W I Q# 231--92=9E118 EDDY 05/ 1~11b4 9P'0 HF'H 3b2-2041 EiF`N 981-1231 I D~k PDY SPA FiRFi 3b6-36:33 HP'H EXT EXT EXT EXT EXT EXT EXT EXT EXT EXT EXT ~ ~ ID# 231-90-6410 Thomas E. Smith, BDY 10/11/62 6525 Greenway Dr SPO Roanoke, Va 24019 HPH 362-5883 EMP BPH 481-1231 ID# 225-b4-2601 Smith-Slocum, Mary 8DY 02/20/54 Box 343 c~FO Dal evi 11 e, Va 24783 HPH 992--4687 EMP BPH 985-2775 ID# 223-70-8467 Spencer, Steve 8DY 06/11/651 Rt i , Eio>: 64 SPO Fincastle, Va 24090 HPH 992-1367 EMP Nancy Firststone BPH 992-30n0 I D# 229-62--7957 St.Clair, Gary BDY ~:~5/24/48 Rt 4 , Etox 561 SPO Troutville, Va 24175 HPH 977-2288 EMP 8PH I D# 225-98-3~~i73 Stanley, k~:en BDY 02/16/61 Rt 1, Box 174-A SPO Fincastle, Va 24090 HPH 992-3816 EMP BPH ID# Sut i i f f , Don F~DY 40 Maple Dr gP0 Blue Ridge, Va 24064 HPH 977-4497 EMP BPH 3bb-2415 I D# 224-~;-8-6059 Tardy, Tammy S. BDY 04/12/61 5455 Winterset Dr SPO FioanoE.e, Va 24014 HPH 989-1713 EMP Roe Times World News BPH 981-334U ID# 238-25-2175 Teets, Teresa ~ BDY c'-5/05/63 Rt 4, Box 548 SPO Troutville, VA 14175 .~ HPH 977-i.~15 EMP Sears BPH 563-3838. ID# 225-78-2191 John L. Thomas, BDY 01/26/53 Rt 1, Box 517 SPO Ann Daleville, Va 24083 HPH 992-=284 EMF' Norfolk Western gPH 981-41?8 I D# 224-~.~2-7893 Thomas, k:athy L. HDY 905 Washington Ave SFCI Vinton, Va 24179 HPH 342-4495 EMP 8PM 3±.43-5836 iD# Tuc~;er, Gene BDY Rt 1, Bvx 350 3P0 Troutville, Va 14175 HPH ' EMP ExT EXT EXT EXT EXT EXT EXT EXT 8t~7 EXT EXT VanBuren, Dennis ID# Rt.2,, Pox 496-AA- PDY Troutville, Va 24173 SFO Peggy-. EMF' HPH 992-2720 PPH EXT Vannes, Pret Yp# Rt 5, Pox 130 EDDY Troutville, Va 2417 gpp EMP HPH 992-34Qg PPH 345-8688 EXT Weaver, Dale ID# 223-9d-d498 Rt 1, Pox 448 PDY 12/ib/6~ Daleville, Va 24083 Sp0 EMP HPH 992-3498 PPH EXT Weber, Charles ID# 223-86-3230 Rt 2, Po>; SdbD BDY 05/22/54 Dal evil l e, Va 24~?8Lti_ gpp EMP Prescription $hoppe _. HPH 992-6423 PPH 992-470 EXT Williams, Lisa ID# 224-13-9477 3324 Hillcrest Ave PDY 11/28/63 FtoanoFtie, Va 24012 gP0 EMP Purolator Courier HPH 362--9712 PPH 985--ds.'~.S EXT Wynn, Mike ID# 3d2d Penn Forest Plv bDY Roanoke, Va 24018 SPO EMP HF'H 982-338.b PPH 982-3400 EXT Wytheville-Jaycee, ID# P, 0. Pox 434 PAY Wytheville, Va 24382 SPO EMP HPH PPH EXT Zimmerman, David ID# 228 W Cleveland St PDY Vinton, Va 24179 8P0 EMP HPH 343-384.8 PPH 981-2287 EXT