The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About6/23/1987 - RegularO~ POANp,~,F ti •~ ~ A z c> ~ 2 J _ a 18 ' '~~ 88 SFSQUICENTENN~P~ A Beauti~ul Beginning; C~nun~~ of ~vttnnkr BOARD OF SUPERVISORS COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HOOGE Reverend Tom Jones Fort Lewis Baptist Church Route 1 Salem, Virginia 24153 Dear Reverend Jones: June 24, 1987 BOB JOHNSON. CHAIRMAN HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT LEE GARRETT. VICE-CHAIRMAN WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT ALAN H. BRITTLE CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT STEVEN A. MCGRAW CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT On behalf of the Board of Supervisors, I would like to take this opportunity to let you know of our appreciation for your attending the meeting on June 23, 1987 to offer the invocation. We feel it is most important to ask God's blessing on these meetings~.,so that all is done according to His will and f or the good of all citizens. Thank you again for sharing your time with us. Very truly y6urfi, mha Bob L. Jo~son, Chairman Roanoke C my Board of Supervisors P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 2 4018-07 9 8 (703> 772-2004 o~ ROANp,I.~ a ~ r` A 2 G7 ~ 2 v ,: ?a 18 E~ 88 SFSQUICEN7ENN~P~ A Beauti~ulBeginning COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE C~nixn~~ of ~vttnnke June 26, 1987 Mr. Stephen A. Musselwhite 549 Aragona Drive Vinton, Virginia 24179 Dear Mr. Musselwhite:: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS 808 JOHNSON. CHAIRMAN HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT LEE GARRETT, VICE-CHAIRMAN WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT ALAN H. BRITTLE CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT STEVEN A. MCGRAW CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT The Board of Supervisors have asked me to express on their behalf their sincere appreciation for your previous service to the Virginia Western Community College Board. Citizens so responsive to the needs of their community and willing to give of themselves and their time are indeed all too scarce. This is to advise that at their meeting held on June 23, 1987, the Board of Supervisors voted unanimously to reappoint you as a member of Virginia Western Community College Board for a four-year term. Your term will expire on June 30, 1991. State law provides that any person elected, re-elected, appointed to any body be furnished a copy of the Freedom of Information Act; your copy is enclosed. We are also sending you a copy of the Conflicts of Interest Act. Both of these have been amended by the 1984 Session of the Virginia General Assembly, and a copy of each amendment is attached. On behalf of the Supervisors and the citizens of Roanoke County, please accept our sincere thanks and appreciation for your willingness to accept this appointment. Very truly yours, Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors bjh Enclosures cc: Dr. Charles Downs, President Virginia Western Community College P. O. Box 14065 Roanoke, Virginia 24038 P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24018-07 9 8 (703) 772-2004 O~ ROANp,1.~ ~. A i ti A 2 G7 ~ 2 o ~a 18 E~ 88 SESGUICENTENN~P~ A Beauti~ul8e~inning COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE (~n~tn~~ of ~A~tnnke Mr. Michael Lazzuri 5812 Knowles Drive Roanoke, Virginia 24018 Dear Mr. Lazzuri: June 26, 1987 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS BOB JOHNSON. CHAIRMAN HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT LEE GARRETT. VICE-CHAIRMAN WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT ALAN H. BRITTLE CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT STEVEN A. MCGRAW CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT The Board of Supervisors have asked me to express on their behalf their sincere appreciation for your previous service to the Recreation Commission. Citizens so responsive to the needs of their community and willing to give of themselves and their time are indeed all too scarce. This ,is to advise that at their meeting held on June 23, 1987, the Board of Supervisors voted unanimously to reappoint you as a member of Recreation Commission for a three-year term. Your term will expire on June 30, 1990. State law provides that any person elected, re-elected, appointed to any body be furnished a copy of the Freedom of Information Act; your copy is enclosed. We are also sending you a copy of the Conflicts of Interest Act. Both of these have been amended by the 1984 Session of the Virginia General Assembly, and a copy of each amendment is attached. On behalf of the Supervisors and the citizens of Roanoke County, please accept our sincere thanks and appreciation for your willingness to accept this appointment. Very truly yours, ~- ~:L..c~c.~-~~. Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors bjh Enclosures CC: Director of Parks & Recreation P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 2 4018-07 9 8 (703) 772-2004 O~ ROANpf.~ a w ~ A z c~ ~ 2 o a~ 18 E50 88 SFSQUICENTENN~P~ A Beauti ful Beginning COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE C~n~tnt~ of ~n~nnke June 26, 1987 Mr. William M. Skelton, Jr. 4349 Cordell Drive, SW Roanoke, Virginia 24018 Dear Mr. Skelton: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS BOB JOHNSON. CHAIRMAN HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT LEE GARRETT. VICE-CHAIRMAN WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT ALAN H. BRITTLE CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT STEVEN A. MCGRAW CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT This is to advise that at their meeting held on June 23, 1987 the Board of Supervisors voted unanimously to appoint you as a member of 'the Recreation Commission for a three year term beginning June 30, 1987, and ending June 30, 1990. State law provides that any person elected, re-elected, appointed, or re-appointed to any body be furnished a copy of the Freedom of Information Act; your copy is enclosed. We are also sending you a copy of the Conflicts of Interest Act. Both of these have been amended by the 1984 Session of the Virginia General Assembly, and a copy of each amendment is attached. On behalf of the Supervisors and the citizens of Roanoke County, please accept our sincere thanks and appreciation for your willingness to accept this appointment. Very truly yours, ~a~, 7`~ Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors bjh Enclosures cc: Director of Parks & Recreation P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 2 4018-07 9 8 (703> 772-2004 O~ POANp,YF a ~ G ti A O 2 a C~~~~~ ~~ ,~~~trt~~.~e ~s E~ ss SFSQUICENTENN~P~' A Beautiful Beginning June 2 6, 19 8 7 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE Mr. Bob L. Johnson, Chairman Board of Supervisors P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, Virginia 24018-0798 Dear Bob: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS B08 JOHNSON. CHAIRMAN HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT LEE GARRETT. VICE-CHAIRMAN WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT ALAN H. BRITTLE CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT STEVEN A. MCGRAW CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT The Board of Supervisors have asked me to express on their behalf their sincere appreciation for your previous service to the Fifth Planning District Commission. Citizens so responsive to the needs of their community and willing to give of themselves and their time are indeed all too scarce. This is to advise that at their meeting held on June 23, 1987, the Board of Supervisors voted unanimously to reappoint you as a member `of Fifth Planning District Commission for a 3-year term. Your term will expire on June 30, 1990. State law provides that any person elected, re-elected, appointed to any body be furnished a copy of the Freedom of Information Act; your copy is enclosed. We are also sending you a copy of the Conflicts of Interest Act. Both of these have been amended by the 1984 Session of the Virginia General Assembly, and a copy of each amendment is attached. On behalf of the Supervisors and the citizens of Roanoke County, please accept our sincere thanks and appreciation for your willingness to accept this appointment. Very truly yours, Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors bjh Enclosures cc: Mr. Gordon Dixton, Executive Director Fifth Planning District Commission 145 West Campbell Avenue Roanoke, Virginia 24010 P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 2 4018-07 9 8 (703) 772-2004 O~ ROANp,F.~ a P ~~ p 2 L7 ~ 2 o a 18 E50 88 `SFgQU1CENTENN~P~' A Bcauti~u/Beginning COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE ~IILtYi~l~ D~ ~11MnII~2P June 26, 1987 Mr. W. E. Hoge 3015 Grander Drive, SW Roanoke, Virginia 24018 Dear Mr. Hoge: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS BOB JOHNSON. CHAIRMAN HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT LEE GARRETT. VICE-CHAIRMAN WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT ALAN H. BRITTLE CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT STEVEN A. MCGRAW CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT The Board of Supervisors have asked me to express their sincere appreciation for your previous service to the Recreation Commission. Allow me to personally thank you for the time you served on thn%s Board. Citizens so responsive to the needs of their community and willing to give of themselves and their time are indeed all too scarce. Very truly yours .~~ ~~~ Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors bjh cc: Director of Parks & Recreation P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 2 4018-07 9 8 (703) 772-2004 G~ (~OANp~.~ a ~ ti~ p 2 ~ ~ Z a 18 Eso 88 SFSQUICENTENN~P~ A Beauti ful Beginning COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE C~n~n~~ of ~nttnnke June 26, 1987 Mr. Lee B. Eddy 2211 Pommell Drive, SW Roanoke, Virginia 24018 Dear Mr. Eddy: The Board of Supervisors have asked me sincere appreciation for your previous service Commission. Allow me to personally thank you served on this Board. Citizens so responsive their community and willing to give of themselvl are indeed all too scarce. Very truly yours BOARD OF SUPERVISORS BOB JOHNSON. CHAIRMAN HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT LEE GARRETT. VICE-CHAIRMAN WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT ALAN H. BRITTLE CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT STEVEN A. MCGRAW CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT to express their to the Planning for the time you to the needs of ~s and their time -~%~'~ Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors bjh cc: Rob Stalzer P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 2 4018-07 9 8 (703) 772-2004 OF POANp,`.~ ~ ~ ~ ~ z c~ ~ Z v t a 18 E5o 88 SFSQUICENTENN~P~ A Beauti~ul Beginning C~vixn~~ v~ ~nttnnk~e BOARD OF SUPERVISORS COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE June 26, 1987 Mr. Michael J. Gordon P. 0. Box 221 Route 1 Bent Mountain, Virginia 24059 Dear Mr. Gordon: BOB JOHNSON, CHAIRMAN HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT LEE GARRETT. VICE-CHAIRMAN WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT ALAN H. BRITTLE CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT STEVEN A. MCGRAW CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VIN TON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT This is to advise that at their meeting held on June 23, 1987 the Board of Supervisors voted unanimously to appoint you as a member of the Planning Commission for the unexpired four-year term of Mr. Lee Eddy, expiring December 31, 1988. State law provides that any person elected, re-elected, appointed or reappointed to any body be furnished a copy of the Freedom of Information Act; your copy is enclosed. We are also sending you a copy of the Conflict of Interest Act. Both of these have been amended by the 1984 Session of the Virginia General Assembly, and a copy of each amendment is attached. It is necessary that you take an oath of office before the Clerk of the Roanoke County Circuit Court. This oath must be administered rp for to your participation on this Committee. Please phone Mrs. Elizabeth W. Stokes, Clerk at 387-6208 as soon as possible and arrange to have the oath administered. On behalf of the Supervisors and the citizens of Roanoke County, please accept our sincere thanks and appreciation for your willingness to accept this appointment. Very truly yours, ,l~v~ Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors bjh Enclosures CC: Mrs. Elizabeth Stokes Rob Stalzer P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 2 4018-07 9 8 (703) 772-2004 ~ POAN ~,cc L ~~~~~~~e ~~~t~ ~~ 18 ~ 88 SESQlIICEN7ENN~P~ ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS n B~u~~~,ia~~"""`g ACTION AGENDA JUNE 23, 1987 Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meeting. Regular meetings are held on the second Tuesday of the month at 2:00 p.m., and the fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public Hearings will be heard at 7:00 p.m on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.) 1. Roll Call. 2. Invocation: The Reverend Tom Jones Fort Lewis Baptist Church 3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag. ~, B. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS 1. Recognition of John Lambert & Associates for winning a Virginia Public Relations Award for the Roanoke County Campaign. LINDA LOVINGOOD WAS PRESENT. C. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS. D. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS AND AWARDS 1. Presentation of a hand-made wall hanging of the County Seal and Resolution of Appreciation to Ogretta Bayer. LG/AHB - URC, BLJ ABSENT E. NEW BUSINESS 1. Request for appropriation for funding of the removal and reinstallation of the Hidden Valley ballfield lights. AHB/SAM TO APPROVE.- URC, BLJ ABSENT 2. Request from Pete Eanes for approval to install an Individual Wastewater Treatment Plant. SAM/AHB TO DENY - URC, BLJ ABSENT STAFF DIRECTED TO WRITE POLICY FOR FUTURE REQUESTS 3. Status Report on the 1985 Bond Program, Road Improvements. NO ACTION 4. Request for approval for inclusion of additional roads into the Rural Addition Program. HCN/SAM TO APPROVE - URC, BLJ ABSENT 5. Request from George Peoples for approval t~ use water from a County-owned stand-by well. HCN/SAM TO APPROVE - URC, BLJ ABSENT F. REQUEST FOR WORK SESSIONS SAM REQUESTED WORK SESSION ON ORDINANCE CONCERNING SEPTIC TANKS. PMM ADVISED HE WOiJ,LD STUDY ORDINANCE, WRITE DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW AND BACK BACK TO BOARD FOR 1ST AND 2ND READING. G. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Request for Public Hearing pursuant to Section 15.1-238 (e) authorizing condemnation and right-of-entry for North Lakes Water Interconnection. AHB/SAM TO SET PUBLIC HEARING ON JULY 14, 1987. URC, BLJ ABSENT H. APPOINTMENTS 1. Recreation Commission. 2. Virginia Western Community College Board. I. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS NICKENS: (1) REQUESTED AN EXECUTIVE SESSION FOR A PERSONNEL MATTER. (2) REQUESTED BOARD SUPPORT FOR LOCATION OF A FARMER'S MARKET IN THE ROANORE VALLEY. ECH RESPONDED HE WILL BRING TO . 7/13/87 BOARD MEETING. (3) ANNOUNCED THAT THERE WILL BE NO DISRUPTION OF CORTRAN TRANSPORTATION SERVICES. THE CONTACT 2 PERSON WILL BE DEBBIE PITTS, PARRS & REC. DEPT. EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 1987. TASK FORCE IS STILL MEETING TO PURSUE FUTURE FUNDING FOR CORTRAN. BRITTLE: (1) ASKED JOHN HUBBARD TO CLEAN OUT WASHED OUT BRIDGE ON CREEK WHICH IS CAUSING OBSTRUCTION OF THE CREEK. (2) ANNOUNCED THAT THE COUNTY JAIL RECEIVED 100$ COMPLIANCE FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS STANDARDS. REQUESTED A LETTER OF CONGRATULATIONS BE SENT TO THE JAIL STAFF. (3) ASKED FOR A WORK SESSION ON THE AUTOMATED REFUSE COLLECTION ON JULY 13, 1987 - REQUESTED THAT PRIVATIZATION ALSO BE INCLUDED IN THE WORK SESSION. ,. GARRETT: (1) APPOINTED PAUL MAHONEY TO SESQUICENTENNIAL '+ COMMISSION'S CELEBRATION OF COUNTY GOVERNMENT DAY. (2) THANKED SUPERVISOR NICRENS FOR HIS CONTRIBUTIONS TOWARD CONTINUATION OF CORTRAN. J. CONSENT AGENDA ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENA~TED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCOSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY. HCN/AHB TO APPROVE - URC, BLJ ABSENT 1. Minutes of Meeting - May 26, 1987. 2. Acceptance of water and sewer lines serving C. M. Davis Apartments. 3. Acceptance of water and sewer facilities serving Woodbridge Subdivision, Section 8. 4. Confirmation of appointments to the Fifth Planning District Commission, the Planning Commission, the Recreation Commission, and Virginia Western Community College Board. 5. Request for acceptance into the Secondary System for 0.25 miles of Hollyberry Road. 6. Request to amend the Minutes of 12/16/86 and Final Order of JELCO Construction Co., Inc., to delete proffers that do not apply to rezoned property. 7. Request for approval of a Raffle Permit for the Catawba Little League. 8. Request for approval of a Fireworks Display Permit for the town of Vinton. K. CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS WALTER, TUNSTALL, 5313 GRANDIN ROAD EXTENSION SPORE ON SEWAGE AND DRAINAGE PROBLEMS ON HIS PROPERTY. L. REPORTS 1. Accounts Paid for May 1987.. 2. Board Contingency Fund. 3. Unappropriated Balance of Budget. 4. Revenue and Expense Analysis for the 11 Months ended May 31, 1987. RECEIVED AND ~ILED M. EXECUTIVE SESSION pursuant to the Code of Virginia 2.1-344 (a). (1) TO DISCUSS PERSONNEL MATTER CONCERNING SHERIFF'S DEPT. AND (6) LEGAL TO DISCUSS DEVELOPMENT OF WATER SYSTEMS LG/HCN - URC, BLJ ABSENT EVENING SESSION (7:00 P.M.) N. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES O. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance authorizing the conveyance of a Drainage Easement, Barrens Village HCN/AHB TO APPROVE - URC, BLJ ABSENT 2. Ordinance amending Chapter 18, "Sewers and Sewage Disposal" concerning the installation of Septic Tanks, requiring a permit and prescribing fees for the issuance of same. HCN/SAM TO APPROVE - URC, BLJ ABSENT n P. PUBLIC HEARINGS (687-1 was heard June 9, 1987) 687-2 Petition of Richfield Retirement Community for a Special Exception Permit to operate a home for adults on a 0.6 acre tract located on the north side of Route 112 in the Catawba Magisterial District. HCN/SAM TO APPROVE - URC, BLJ ABSENT 687-3 Petition of T. D. Steele to rezone approximately 8.77 acre from RE, Residential Estates, to B-2,~ Business located on the north side of Buck Mountain Road immediately west of the Blue Ridge Parkway in Cave Spring Magisterial District. AHB/SAM TO APPROVE - URC, BLJ ABSENT 687-4 Petition of Scott and Snyder Service Bureau to rezone a 0.574 acre tract from A-1, Agricultural and M-1, Industrial to B-2, Business located on the north side ~. of Peters Creek Road in the Hollins Magisterial 'District. HCN/AHB TO APPROVE - URC, BLJ ABSENT 687-5 Petition of T & B Realty for Southeastern Optical, Inc. to rezone a 0.73 acre tract from B-1, Business, to M-1, Industrial located at 4607 Old Cave Spring Road in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District. LG/SAM TO APPROVE - URC, BLJ ABSENT 687-6 Petition of R. William Reid Builders to rezone a 0.25 acre tract from B-l, Business, to B-2, Business with conditions located at 4530 Old Cave Spring Road in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District. LG/AHB TO APPROVE - URC, BLJ ABSENT 687-7 Petition of Larry D. Fisher to rezone a 0.93 acre tract from B-1, Business to B-3, Business located at the northwest intersection of Route 460 and Shawnee Drive in the Catawba Magisterial District. SAM/HCN TO APPROVE REZONING AND SPECIAL EXCEPTION PERMIT - URC BLJ ABSENT 687-8 Petition of Jerry W. Bush and Janat L. Bush to vacate plat of Ramsgate Court Subdivision. (WITHDRAWN BY PETITIONER) C 687-9 Public Hearing on Establishment of Construction Fund priority for the Secondary System of the State Highways for Fiscal Year 1987-88. SAM/LG TO APPROVE RESOLUTION - URC, BLJ ABSENT 687-10 Public Hearing to hear citizen comment on an Ordinance amending Chapter 18, "Sewers and Sewage Disposal," concerning the installation of septic tanks and requiring a permit and prescribing fees for the issuance of permits. NO ONE PRESENT TO SPEAR ,. '( Q. CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS MRS. CURBOW, 3637 KENTLAND DRIVE S. W. ASKED FOR STATUS REPORT ON DRAINAGE SOLUTIONS IN HER NEIGHBORHOOD R. ADJOURNMENT at 9:02 p.m. .,,, i o~ aonNO~.~ ~" ~= rte ~~ ~~~t~~~.~e ~~~ ,~ ~ ~s .~~ s$ sFSCfuiceNTeNN~p~ ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS A Beautifu/8eginning AGENDA ,TUNE 23, 1987 Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meeting. Remulaand meetings are held on the second Tuesday of the month at 2:00 p. the fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public Hearings will be heard at 7:00 p.m on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.) 1. Roll Call. 2. Invocation: The Reverend Tom Jones Fort Lewis Baptist Church 3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag. B. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS 1. Recognition of John Lambert & Associates for winning a Virginia Public Relations Award for the Roanoke County Campaign. C. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS. D. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS AND AWARDS 1. Presentation of a hand-made wall hanging of the County Seal and Resolution of Appreciation to Ogretta Bayer. E. NEW BUSINESS 1. Request for appropriation for funding of the removal and reinstallation of the Hidden Valley ballfield lights. 2. Request from Pete Eanes for approval to install an Individual Wastewater Treatment Plant. 3. Status Report on the 1985 Bond Program, Road Improvements. 4. Request for approval for inclusion of additional roads into the Rural Addition Program. 5. Request from George Peoples for approval to use water from a County-owned stand-by well. F. REQUEST FOR WORK SESSIONS G. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Request for Public Hearing pursuant to Section 15.1-238 (e) authorizing condemnation and right-of-entry for North Lakes Water Interconnection. H. APPOINTMENTS 1. Recreation Commission. 2. Virginia Western Community College Board. I. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS J. CONSENT AGENDA ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY. 1. Minutes of Meeting - May 26, 1987. 2. Acceptance of water and sewer lines serving C. M. Davis Apartments. 3. Acceptance of water and sewer facilities serving Woodbridge Subdivision, Section 8. 4. Confirmation of appointments to the Fifth Planning District Commission, the Planning Commission, the Recreation Commission, and Virginia Western Community College Board. 2 5. Request for acceptance into the Secondary System for 0.25 miles of Hollyberry Road. 6. Request to amend the Minutes of 12/16/86 and Final Order of JELCO Construction Co., Inc., to delete proffers that do not apply to rezoned property. 7. Request for approval of a Raffle Permit for the Catawba Little League. 8. Request for approval of a Fireworks Display Permit for the town of Vinton. K. CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS L. REPORTS 1. Accounts Paid for May 1987. 2. Board Contingency Fund. 3. Unappropriated Balance of Budget. 4. Revenue and Expense Analysis for the 11 Months ended May 31, 1987. M. EXECUTIVE SESSION pursuant to the Code of Virginia 2.1-344 (a). EVENING SESSION (7:00 P.M.) N. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 0. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance authorizing the conveyance of a Drainage Easement, Barrens Village. 2. Ordinance amending Chapter 18, "Sewers and Sewage Disposal" concerning the installation of Septic Tanks, requiring a permit and prescribing fees for the issuance of same. 3 P. PUBLIC HEARINGS (687-1 was heard June 9, 1987) 687-2 Petition of Richfield Retirement Community for a Special Exception Permit to operate a home for adults on a 0.6 acre tract located on the north side of Route 112 in the Catawba Magisterial District. 687-3 Petition of T. D. Steele to rezone approximately 8.77 acre from RE, Residential Estates, to B-2, Business located on the north side of Buck Mountain Road immediately west of the Blue Ridge Parkway in Cave Spring Magisterial District. 687-4 Petition of Scott and Snyder Service Bureau to rezone a 0.574 acre tract from A-l, Agricultural and M-l, Industrial to B-2, Business located on the north side of Peters Creek Road in the Hollins Magisterial District. 687-5 Petition of T & B Realty for Southeastern Optical, Inc. to rezone a 0.73 acre tract from B-l, Business, to M-l, Industrial located at 4607 Old Cave Spring Road in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District. 687-6 Petition of R. William Reid Builders to rezone a 0.25 acre tract from B-1, Business, to B-2, Business with conditions located at 4530 Old Cave Spring Road in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District. 687-7 Petition of Larry D. Fisher to rezone a 0.93 acre tract from B-l, Business to B-3, Business located at the northwest intersection of Route 460 and Shawnee Drive in the Catawba Magisterial District. 687-8 Petition of Jerry W. Bush and Janat L. Bush to vacate plat of Ramsgate Court Subdivision. (WITHDRAWN BY PETITIONER) 687-9 Public Hearing on Establishment of Construction Fund priority for the Secondary System of the State Highways for Fiscal Year 1987-88. 687-10 Public Hearing to hear citizen comment on an Ordinance amending Chapter 18, "Sewers and Sewage Disposal," concerning the installation of septic tanks and requiring a permit and prescribing fees for the issuance of permits. Q. CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS R. ADJOURNMENT 4 ITEM NUMBER ~ ~- I AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: June 23, 1987 SUBJECT: Presentation of a Hand-made Wall Hanging of the Roanoke County Seal to the Board of Supervisors COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Ogretta Bayers, a long-time resident of Roanoke County has spent six months making a hooked wall hanging of the County Seal. She is donating this framed hanging to the County for use during the Sesquicentennial Celebration. Carol Gialllanza, Executive Director of the Sesquicentennial, will be present to introduce Mrs. Bayers who will present the seal to the County. The Board has prepared a Resolution of Appreciation to Mrs. Bayers which will be given to her at that time. SUBMITTED BY: ~- Mary H. Allen Deputy Clerk APPROVED BY: ~"' / lmer C. H ge County Administrator ------------------------------------------------------ ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion bv: No Yes A Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred To Brittle Garrett Johnson McGraw Nickens ~- AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JUNE 23, 1987 RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION TO OGRETTA BAYER FOR DONATION OF A HOOKED WALL HANGING OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY SEAL BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: WHEREAS, Roanoke County will be celebrating its 150th birthday in 1988; and WHEREAS, the Sesquicentennial will offer an opportunity for all the residents of the Roanoke Valley to take part in activities honoring this important event; and WHEREAS, Ogretta Bayer has chosen an imaginative and colorful way to show her love for the County by her gift of a hand-made County Seal to be used in the Sesquicentennial activities in 1988; and WHEREAS, Mrs. Bayer, a resident of Roanoke County for fifty four years, invested six months of her life creating this seal from used, recycled strips of wool. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County expresses its deepest appreciation to Ogretta Bayer for expending her time, materials, and talent; and donating such a unique contribution to the Sesquicentennial Celebration. FURTHER, the Board of Supervisors hereby designates that this seal be used during the Sesquicentennial year whenever it is deemed appropriate, and that at the conclusion of the celebration, it be permanently displayed at one of the County's public buildings. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JUNE 23, 1987 RESOLUTION 62387-1 OF APPRECIATION 'rO OGRETTA BAYER FOR DONATION OF A HOOKED WALL HANGING OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY SEAL BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: WHEREAS, Roanoke County will be celebrating its 150th birthday in 1988; and WHEREAS, the Sesquicentennial will offer an opportunity for all the residents of the Roanoke Valley to take part in activities honoring this important event; and WHEREAS, Ogretta Bayer has chosen an imaginative and colorful way to show her love for the County by her gift of a hand-made County Seal to be used in the Sesquicentennial activities in 1988; and WHEREAS, Mrs. Bayer, a resident of Roanoke County for fifty four years, invested six months of her life creating this seal from used, recycled strips of wool. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County expresses its deepest appreciation to Ogretta Bayer for expending her time, materials, and talent; and donating such a unique contribution to the Sesquicentennial Celebration. FURTHER, the Board of Supervisors hereby designates that this seal be used during the Sesquicentennial year whenever it is deemed appropriate, and that at the conclusion of the celebration, it be permanently displayed at one of the County's public buildings. On motion of Supervisor Garrett, seconded by Supervisor Brittle, and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Johnson A COPY - TESTE: 7'Y)Qh--~~ ~- Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk 6/25/87 cc: File Resolution of Appreciation File r AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE IN ROANOKE, VA., ON MEETING DATE: June 23, 1987 ITEM NUMBER _~~_ OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER TUESDAY, SUBJECT: Conveyance of a drainage easement Barrens Village COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~~.y2,r~1'rnnwrw~-~ (w G~ ~~ SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: F and B Developers, Inc. has requested the conveyance of a 15-foot drainage easement across a well lot owned by Roanoke County in Section 1, Deer Run Estates in order to successfully complete the construction of Barrens Village. The easement will be located along the south property line of the well lot and will be dedicated for public use. Section 18.04 of the County Charter requires that the conveyance of real estate or any interest there- in be accomplished only by ordinance. The proposed ordinance authorizes the County Administrator to execute such documents and take such actions as may be neces- sary to accomplish these transactions. The first reading of the proposed ordinance was held on June 9, 1987; the second reading is scheduled for June 23, 1987. FISCAL IMPACT: ~~ None. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Board favorably consider this proposal by the adoption of the attached ordinance. Respectfully submitted, ~~~~~ ~~Nl ~ ~r~~~"' Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney ------------------- ----------------------- ACTION VOTE Motion b No Yes Abs Approved ( ) y' Brittle Denied ( ) Garrett Received ( ) Johnson Referred McGraw To Nickens S ~ v ` AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, ON TUESDAY, JUNE 23, 1987 ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE CONVEYANCE OF A DRAINAGE EASEMENT, BARRENS VILLAGE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading concerning the conveyance of a drainage easement for Barrens Village was held on June 9, 1987. A second reading on this matter was held on June 23, 1987. 2. That this drainage easement is necessary in order to pipe storm water from Barrens Village to existing facilities in Starmount Avenue. 3. That the County Administrator is authorized to exe- cute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County as are necessary to accomplish the conveyance of said pro- perty, all of which shall be upon form approved by the County Attorney. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, ON TUESDAY, JUNE 23, 1987 ORDINANCE 62387-8 AUTHORIZING THE CONVEYANCE OF A DRAINAGE EASEMENT, BARRENS VILLAGE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. Tha t pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading concerning the conveyance of a drainage easement for Barrens Village was held on June 9, 1987. A second reading on this matter was held on June 23, 1987. 2. That this drainage easement is necessary in order to pipe storm water from Barrens Village to existing facilities in Starmount Avenue. 3. That the County Administrator is authorized to exe- cute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County as are necessary to accomplish the conveyance of said pro- perty, all of which shall be upon form approved by the County Attorney. On motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by Supervisor Brittle, and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Johnson A COPY - TESTS: Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk 6/25/87 cc: File Real Estate Assessor County Attorney Utilities Department Engineering Department ITEM NUMBER ~ ' %x`t-' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER IN ROANOKE, VA., ON TUESDAY, MEETING DATE: June 23, 1987 SUBJECT: Ordinance amending Chapter 18, "Sewers and Sewage Dis- posal," concerning the installation of Septic Tanks and requiring a permit and prescribing fees for the issu- ance of permits COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: (~~(Sl'WV~-VU~.e~ ,~-(yI(,~1',1''~C`t,~ . (`~ ~,~~ ~~~ ~~' 0'~ I~ ~-~'~"n'„''`"'t (~~ I ~tiJ ~ S G~~~JVV~ C ~~~W~~1~Za 3~ ~ ~it~`~.X9-'~wti` ~ `'~"e-S . SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Section 15.1-520 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, authorizes any County to regulate the installation of septic tanks by requiring any person desiring to install a septic tank to secure a permit and to prescribe reasonable fees for the issu- ance of said permits. Defective or failed septic systems pose a significant threat to public health, safety, and welfare. There- fore, the Roanoke County Code should be amended to require such a permit as a prerequisite to septic tank installation and impose a permit fee of $50.00. This permit fee was discussed during the budget process. Although it is estimated that approximately $29,000 in fees could be generated by this permit process, it is also anticipated that the imposition of a fee will reduce the number of septic tank requests. The Health Department concurs in this suggestion and advises that both Floyd and Montgomery counties impose a $50 fee. This permit process could improve planning and control of unregulated developmental impacts. It also could generate funds to defray a portion of the County's costs for sanitarians and inspectors. The first reading of an amending ordinance was held on June 9, 1987; a second reading and public hearing is scheduled for June 23, 1987. FISCAL IMPACT: $50.00 permit fee, estimate of $29,000 General Fund revenues for FY 1987-88 RECOMMENDATION: ,~~ It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors favorably consider this proposed ordinance amending the County Code. Respectfully submitted, ~ , l~C Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney ------------- ------------------- ACTION ~ VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred To Brittle Garrett Johnson McGraw Nickens AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINIS'I'RATION CENTER, ON TUESDAY, JUNE 23, 1987 ORDINANCE 62387-9 AMENDING CHAPTER 18, "SEWERS AND SEWAGE DISPOSAL," AN ORDINANCE CONCERNING THE INSTALLATION OF SEPTIC TANKS, REQUIRING A PERMIT AND PRESCRIBING FEES FOR THE ISSUANCE OF SAME WHEREAS, Section 15.1-520 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, authorizes any county to regulate the installa- tion of septic tanks, to require that any person desiring to in- stall a septic tank secure a permit to do so, and to prescribe reasonable fees for the issuance of said permits; and WHEREAS, defective or failed septic systems pose a sig- nificant threat to public health, safety, and welfare, constitute an environmental and ecological hazard, and threaten the County's precious groundwater resources. IT I5 HEREBY ORDAINED by the Board of Roanoke County, Virginia, that Chapter 18, "Sewers and Sewage Disposal," is here- by amended as follows: 1) All buildings in the county in those areas where septic tanks are permitted shall have septic tanks installed for the disposing of sewage and other human waste. 2) Before any septic tank systems are constructed or installed, it shall be the duty of the landowner upon whose land the construction or installation is to take place, to secure a permit from the Health Department. The Health Department shall review this permit request based upon the requirements and regula- tions promulgated pursuant to Title 32.1 of the Code of Virginia. Any septic tank permit issued under this section shall be valid for a period of fifty-four (54) months from the date of issuance unless there has been a substantial, intervening change in the soil or site conditions where the septic system is to be located. The availability of a public sewer system shall constitute a sub- stantial intervening change in the site conditions to void a per- mit. 3) There is hereby established a permit fee of fifty dollars ($50.00) for each septic tank. This permit fee shall be paid to the Treasurer before permit application is made to the Health Department. 4) Any person, firm or corporation violating any provi- sions of this ordinance shall be subject to a Class 3 misdemeanor for each offense; and a separate offense shall be deemed commit- ted on each day during or on which a violation occurs or contin- ues. Further any violation or attempted violation of this ordin- ance may be restrained, corrected or abated by injunction or other appropriate proceeding. 5> The effective date of this ordinance shall be July 1, 1987. On motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by Supervisor McGraw, and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Johnson A COPY - TESTE: ~~d.~t_-~.-r ~ . C.r.,~..C.~t-.~l Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk 6/25/87 cc: File County Attorney Department of Development Dr. Margaret Hagan, Health Department County Treasurer Homebuiiders Association Commonwealth's Attorney Magistrate Sheriff's Department MainLibrary Roanoke Law Library Code File AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, ON TUESDAY, JUNE 23, 1987 ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 18, "SEWERS ,,~~^^~~ ~' AND SEWAGE DISPOSAL," AN ORDINANCE CON- `rte _ ~~ CERNING THE INSTALLATION OF SEPTIC TANKS, REQUIRING A PERMIT AND PRESCRIB- ING FEES FOR THE ISSUANCE OF SAME WHEREAS, Section 15.1-520 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, authorizes any county to regulate the installa- tion of septic tanks, to require that any person desiring to in- stall a septic tank secure a permit to do so, and to prescribe reasonable fees for the issuance of said permits; and WHEREAS, defective or failed septic systems pose a sig- nificant threat to public health, safety, and welfare, constitute an environmental and ecological hazard, and threaten the County's precious groundwater resources. IT IS HEREBY ORDAINED by the Board of Roanoke County, Virginia, that Chapter 18, "Sewers and Sewage Disposal," is here- by amended as follows: 1) All buildings in the county in those areas where septic tanks are permitted shall have septic tanks installed for the disposing of sewage and other human waste. 2) Before any septic tank systems are constructed or installed, it shall be the duty of the landowner upon whose land the construction or installation is to take place, to secure a permit from the Health Department. The Health Department shall review this permit request based upon the requirements and regula- tions promulgated pursuant to Title 32.1 of the Code of Virginia. Any septic tank permit issued under this section shall be valid . . ~_ .-/A for a period of fifty-four (54) months from the date of issuance unless there has been a substantial, intervening change in the soil or site conditions where the septic system is to be located. The availability of a public sewer system shall constitute a sub- stantial intervening change in the site conditions to void a per- mit. 3) There is hereby established a permit fee of fifty dollars ($50.00) for each septic tank. This permit fee shall be paid to the Treasurer before permit application is made to the Health Department. 4) Any person, firm or corporation violating any provi- sions of this ordinance shall be subject to a Class 3 misdemeanor for each offense; and a separate offense shall be deemed commit- ted on each day during or on which a violation occurs or contin- ues. Further any violation or attempted violation of this ordin- ance may be restrained, corrected or abated by injunction or other appropriate proceeding. 5) The effective date of this ordinance shall be July 1, 1987. A-62387-2r,.. ITEM NUMBER ~' f AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: June 23, 1987 SUBJECT: Appropriation for funding of the removal and reinstallation of the Hidden Valley ballfield lights COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The removal of the Hidden originally paid for from bond Recreation Commission meeting, unanimously approved a request reinstallation be assumed from funds. Valley ballfield proceeds. At the the Recreation G that the removal the general fund lights was December 11, 1986 ~mmission and rather than bond The Recreation Commission requested this of the Board of Supervisors at a joint meeting held December 16, 1986. The Board verbally approved the funding come from another source rather than bond proceeds. The Recreation Commission and staff have recommended the installation of the lights at Clearbrook Park. .. ,,w, FISCAL IMPACT:~~~; Funding this request will result in an appropriation of $22,897.00 from the Board's contingency fund. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends an appropriation of $22,897.00 to cover the expense of removal and reinstallation of the lights. SUBMITTED BY: Ga y A. uff A sista t Direct Buildings and Grounds APPROVED BY: Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ~- l ----------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ~ Motion by: AHB/SAM to approve No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Brittle X Received ( ) Garrett X Referred Johnson X to McGraw X Nickens X cc: File Gary Huff John Hubbard Steve Carpenter Reta Busher A-62387-3 ITEM NUMBER ~ ~, AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: June 23, 1987 SUBJECT: Request by Mr. Pete C. Eanes to Secure County Approval for the Installation of an Individual Wastewater Treatment Plant COUNTY ADMJINIST~/RATOR' S C~/OMMENTS~J: / q 9 r7 ~~ G-Cl'y~'~t x. a` o~T...c~t" ~,~G.c..CC-..~ -Ci-~¢~~t ..~~. .cl.L.u/Ctti/rr _4i C~4sL{ ~"'`"r~``/ SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Mr. Peter C. Eanes has applied to the State Water Control Board for a permit to install an individual wastewater treatment plant to serve an existing lot located at 1723 Wygal Drive, Salem. This lot is not suitable for on-lot sewage disposal and public sewer is not available. Prior to consideration of this application by the State Water Control Board, approval by the local political subdivision is required. The individual wastewater treatment plant which is proposed, would basically be an aerated septic tank with an upflow filter, chlorination and discharge to a tributary to Mason's Creek. It would serve one lot only and would not be considered a public wastewater treatment plant. Staff recommends that individual on-lot wastewater treatment plants not be approved within Roanoke County for lots that are part of a subdivision. Roanoke County wastewater treatment should be by public owned and operated facilities or where these facilities are not available by on-lot septic or aerobic systems with sub-surface disposal. Staff is concerned that the proposed individual wastewater treatment plant would not be operated or monitored properly. This type of plant would not meet the same effluent standards as we are required to meet at the regional wastewater treatment plant. Individual treatment plants rely highly on chlorination of the effluent to meet their discharge requirements. It is well known that the chlorination of organic material create trihalomethanes (THM's) which are carcinogenic. In order to reduce the hazard of THM production, the regional wastewater treatment facility must de-chlorinate their effluent to meet discharge requirements. It does not appear logical to add to the ~... '., c .. current THM problem by approving additional discharges from individual wastewater treatment facilities. FISCAL IMPACT: ~~ N/A RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that approval not be granted for the installation of individual wastewater treatment plants for the purpose of providing service to existing vacant lots. SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED: Clifford Craig lmer C. Hod Director of Utilities County Administrator ------------------------------------------------------------------ ACTION VOTE Approved ( > Motion by: SAM/AHB to deny No Yes Abs Denied (X) approval Brittle X Received ( ) Garrett X Referred Johnson X To McGraw ~ Nickens x cc: File Cliff Craig John Hubbard °,as ~\ ~ ~xa ii r/11' ~+~~'..y,~, L.-' v ~° \ NORTH __ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 9 ~ 162 Ac f 6 `• Q \ 2 's \\ 8 1 ~ 2.3BAc ~~ 9' y 6 3 ~ W N 42 t1 ••0 ' .~ ~ °~ ~ 1 2 Ac 10 1.23Ac 1.2~ Ac ' • 2. 39 II r S rLIBAC ~ 18 s 2 ~ `+~ 12 r ~ n•a~ •~ ~ S' ~ `.• • ••~ ,,, . ; • ~» r I. 6 164 ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ s ` I "•• 12 ' I t ,. 36 ~,.• • 4 ..~. ~t ~• ~ rr .15 ,. ,~~~ ~,. .r ~~ ~ . ;. 15 9.88 Ac ' 14 ~ . ~• 13 24 ~ ~'o i6 ~ I 1.28 Ac ~ . - %~I~ ~ ° ~ ~~ 34 5\. '•' - ' J nr2 ~~~~-si~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ t I 6 2 a ' j ' ' ~ rih ,D ~ 27 .y ~ 33 ~ -r °„•„-_ It9 28i ~ • ~ ~~ ~' 17.7SAcSD1 : ~ ft ~ I I s + IS 90Ac ICl 32 Q, xa ~w ~ ,Q 31 t ~ t ~'~ ~ r 19 31 ~~ •~` ~~ t ~ •• ~ 32 O 30 '~ ••~22 p • y\. ~ , '' ~ ~ 28~ 2a • ~I 443 Ac r 5 r~ r •26r~ / ~ 2T" p.00Ac ml ~ 9.01 Ac {CI r ~ ~ 47 ~ . / ti...rs .. 45 ~ 3.30Ac ~b ~~ 7.15Ac / • 48 O \ ~ I ~ 34 ~ DEPARTMENT OF REQUEST TO INSTALL IN DIVIDUAL WASTEWATER PUBLIC FACILITIES TREATMENT PLANT - 172 3 WYGAL DRIVE, SALEM is ~' .:~- CJ~ M E M O R A N D U M TO: Cliff Craig FROM: Gary Robertson DATE: June 10, 1987 RE: Peter Eanes State Water Control Board - Spoke with Don Prager - They will approve these systems but have concerns over their use - mainly lack of maintenance - The discharge limits will be placed at 30/30 - There is no required testing or monitoring - Meets all requirements from a water pollution stand point State Health Department - Spoke with Dr. Hagen and Mo Owen - The proposed installation meets all present State requirements and is the only alternative for this lot - Both feel that these systems have their place but their use should be scrutinized - The Health Department is preparing regulations that would require the owners to have maintenance contracts with private firms. - They feel the chlorination is a valid concern, but that is the reason for scrutinizing where and how many systems are allowed. - They feel the cost of these systems will keep them from proliferating - They recommend approval, but think we might want to require that the owner have a maintenance contract khb c: John Hubbard i ITEM NUMBER ~--~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: June 23, 1987 SUBJECT: 1985 Bond Program, Road Improvements, Status Report COUNTY ADMINI~STRATOR'S COMMENTS: 'o ~g ~ p Gilt~L'~C-c;n.cc~„ „d~r~ .~ C.-C~.s..u,e. ,~c-~ .~C/Le.. „C.~cc~ `. ~ /L/ua. .iG't~-r~ ~yL~c~se.~ . SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Since the Bond Referendum was approved by the voters of Roanoke County in 1985, the County has requested and received matching funds from the VDH&T (now VDOT). With the $500,000 match, the Board of Supervisors has a total of $1,100,000 available for upgrading subdivision streets to be accepted by VDOT. At a regular meeting on September 9, 1986, the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors approved the use of $43,033 in unmatched funds for the remaining private roads in the LaBellevue Subdivision. Consequently, the Board now has $56,967 in unmatched funds and $1,000,000 in matched funds available for road improvements. The State Code relating to the use of matching funds requires the new additions to be Subdivision Streets recorded prior to July 1, 1977. In addition, VDOT Policies require that all submissions must comply with Rural Addition Policies. We have enclosed a copy of the VDOT Rural Addition Policy for your review. Attached for your review is a Summary Sheet for all roads previously prioritized by the Board of Supervisors for improvement. The Board has previously recommended the acceptance of eleven (11) of the 46 streets in the 16 Subdivisions outlined on the attached status sheets. The remaining projects are moving expeditiously toward final acceptance. y: FISCAL IMPACT: ~~ None. RECOMMENDATION: None. SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED: .~ Phalli T. Henry, E. Elmer Hodg Direct r of Engine ing County Administrator ----------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by• No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Brittle Garrett Johnson McGraw Nickens ~T m~.~u .. .. ,~Pf PRIORITY LIST, MATCHING FUNDS ( $1,000,000 ) ROAD NAME 1. Airpoint Drive (0.26 miles), Airpoint Road (0.26 miles), STATUS Airpoint Subdivision, (1) Recorded July 9, 1965; $150,000 2. Buckhorn Circle (0.35 Miles), Deerfield Place (0.22 Miles), Chukar Circle (0.10 miles), Red Stag Road (0.13 Miles), Elk Hill Drive (0.07 miles, Archer Drive (0.20 miles), Crossbow Circle (0.67 miles), Remington Road (0.33 miles), Partridge Circle (0.08 miles), Hawkbill Circle (0.09 miles), Falcon Ridge Road (0.39 miles), Kildeer Circle (0.10 miles), Flintlock Road (0.49 miles), Turkey Hollow Road (0.19 miles), Fox Ridge Road (0.44 miles), Hunting Hills Subdivision, Recorded May 19, 1966; October 10, 1968; December 15, 1971; June 6, 1973; April 20, 1976; August 12, 1975; $200,000 (2) 3. White Eagle Lane (0.06 miles), Buffalo Circle (0.15 miles), Blackhawk Circle (0.04 miles), Tee- Pee Lane (0.07 miles), Warrior Drive (0.20 miles), Buckskin Lane (0.11 miles), Canoe Circle (0.07 miles), Warbonnet Road (0.13 miles), Tomahawk Circle (0.09 miles), Scout Circle (0.09 miles), Cherokee Hills Subdivision, (3) Recorded February 13, 1976; $185,000 4. Memory Lane (0.04 miles), Tinker Knoll Subdivision, Recorded October 23, 1961 $ 15,000 (1) 5, Shadow Lane (0.05 miles), Beacon Hills Subdivision, (1> Recorded January 8, 1969 $ 5,000 6. Indian Hill Drive (0.18 miles), Westward Lake Subdivision, (1) Recorded February 23, 1956 $ 40,000 7. Beavers Lane (0.15 miles, ) Elizabeth Drive (0.13 miles), 3 Fox Fire Subdivision, ~ ``" Recorded June 30, 1977 $ 25,000 (1) 8. Village Lane (0.05 miles), Plantation Village Subdivision, Recorded August 2, 1973 $ 15,000 (3) 9. Hill Drive (0.08 miles), Pine Hill Subdivision, Recorded February 16, 1975 $ 15,000 (1) 10. Lakemont Drive (0.56 miles), Farmingdale South Subdivision, Recorded August 13, 1974 $ 35,000 (1) 11. Wing Commander Drive (0.17 miles), Grape Tree Tree Lane (0.14 miles) Nichols Estates Subdivision, Recorded May 20, 1977 $ 40,000 (1) 12. Timberline Trail (0.26 miles), Ferguson Drive (0.23 miles), Wild Oak Drive (0.09 miles), Homeland Hills Subdivision, Recorded January 22, 1974; March 14, 1975 $ 40,000 (3} 13. Country Lane (0.37 miles), Country Hills Subdivision, Recorded May 19, 1976 $ 50,000 (3) 14. Lakedale Road (0.13 miles), Highfields Subdivision, Recorded February 4, 1957 $ 50,000 (3) 15. Meadwood Place (0.13 miles), Quail Place (0.17 miles), Meadwood Subdivision, Recorded September 1, 1965 $200,000 (3) 16. Bridlewood Drive (0.37 miles), Saddlewood Road (0.26 miles), Bridlewood Subdivision, Recorded August 4, 1975 $250,000 (4> ~-3 NOTES 1. All right-of-ways and drainage esements acquired, road meets requirements to be accepted by VDOT. Previously approved by the Board of Supervisors on June 9, 1986. 2. Drainage Improvements required prior to meeting state requirements. Local developers are currently making improvements. 3. Right-of-ways and drainage esements have not been acquired. County Attorney's Office is preparing necessary documents for property owner's signature. 4. Roads not anticipated to be constructed due to lack of funds. ~'::_: PRIORITY LIST, MATCHING FUNDS ( $1,000,000 ) ROAD NAME STATUS 1. Airpoint Drive (0.26 miles), Airpoint Road (0.26 miles), Airpoint Subdivision, Recorded July 9, 1965; $150,000 (1) 2. Buckhorn Circle (0.35 Miles), Deerfield Place (0.22 Miles), Chukar Circle (0.10 miles), Red Stag Road (0.13 Miles), Elk Hill Drive (0.07 miles, Archer Drive (0.20 miles), Crossbow Circle (0.67 miles), Remington Road (0.33 miles), Partridge Circle (0.08 miles), Hawkbill Circle (0.09 miles), Falcon Ridge Road (0.39 miles), Kildeer Circle (0.10 miles), Flintlock Road (0.49 miles), Turkey Hollow Road (0.19 miles), Fox Ridge Road (0.44 miles), Hunting Hills Subdivision, Recorded May 19, 1966; October 10, 1968; December 15, 1971; June 6, 1973; April 20, 1976; August 12, 1975; $200,000 (2) 3. White Eagle Lane (0.06 miles), Buffalo Circle (0.15 miles), Blackhawk Circle (0.04 miles), Tee- Pee Lane (0.07 miles), Warrior Drive (0.20 miles), Buckskin Lane (0.11 miles), Canoe Circle (0.07 miles), Warbonnet Road (0.13 miles), Tomahawk Circle (0.09 miles), Scout Circle (0.09 miles), Cherokee Hills Subdivision, Recorded February 13, 1976; $185,000 (3) 4. Memory Lane (0.04 miles), Tinker Knoll Subdivision, Recorded October 23, 1961 $ 15,000 (1) 5. Shadow Lane (0.05 miles), Beacon Hills Subdivision, Recorded January 8, 1969 $ 5,000 (1) 6. Indian Hill Drive (0.18 miles), Westward Lake Subdivision, Recorded February 23, 1956 $ 40,000 (1) 7. Beavers Lane (0.15 miles, ) Elizabeth Drive (0.13 miles), 3 ~.. Fox Fire Subdivision, Recorded June 30, 1977 $ 25,000 (1) 8. Village Lane (0.05 miles), Plantation Village Subdivision, Recorded August 2, 1973 $ 15,000 (3) 9. Hill Drive (0.08 miles), Pine Hill Subdivision, Recorded February 16, 1975 $ 15,000 (1) 10. Lakemont Drive (0.56 miles), Farmingdale South Subdivision, Recorded August 13, 1974 $ 35,000 (1) 11. Wing Commander Drive (0.17 miles), Grape Tree Tree Lane (0.14 miles) Nichols Estates Subdivision, Recorded May 20, 1977 $ 40,000 (1) 12. Timberline Trail (0.26 miles), Ferguson Drive (0.23 miles), Wild Oak Drive (0.09 miles), Homeland Hills Subdivision, Recorded January 22, 1974; March 14, 1975 $ 40,000 (3} 13. Country Lane (0.37 miles), Country Hills Subdivision, Recorded May 19, 1976 $ 50,000 (3) 14. Lakedale Road (0.13 miles), Highfields Subdivision, Recorded February 4, 1957 $ 50,000 (3) 15. Meadwood Place (0.13 miles), Quail Place (0.17 miles), Meadwood Subdivision, Recorded September 1, 1965 $200,000 (3) 16. Bridlewood Drive (0.37 miles), Saddlewood Road (0.26 miles), Bridlewood Subdivision, Recorded August 4, 1975 $250,000 (4) ~~_ u NOTES 1. All right-of-ways and drainage esements acquired, road meets requirements to be accepted by VDOT. 2. Drainage Improvements required prior to meeting state requirements. Local developers are currently making improvements. 3. Right-of-ways and drainage esements have not been acquired. County Attorney's Office is preparing necessary documents for property owner's signature. 4. Roads not anticipated to be constructed due to lack of funds. ~:.~ ..% 4.0 RURAL ADDITIONS 4.1 Introduction As part of the Secondary Highway Construction Program, the Board of Supervisors may set aside a small portion of the construction funds for Rural Additions. Generally, these fund can be used for constructing new roads or for upgrading subdivision streets recorded prior to July 1, 1977. 4.2 State Code References §33.1-72.1. Taking certain streets into secondary system. -- A. "Street," as used in this section, means a street or highway shown on a plat which was recorded or otherwise opened to public use prior to July 1, 1977, at which time it was open to and used by motor vehicles, and which, for any reason, has not been taken into the secondary system of state highways and serves at least three families per mile. B. "County," as used in this section, means a county in which the secondary system of the state highways is constructed and maintained by the Department of Highways and Transportation and which has adopted a local ordinance for control of the development of subdivision streets to the necessary standards for acceptance into the secondary system. C. Whenever the governing body of a county recommends in writing to the Department of Highways and Transportation that any street in the county be taken into and become a part of the secondary system of the state highways in such county, the Department of Highways and Transportation thereupon, within the limit of available funds and the mileage available in such county for the inclusion of roads and streets in the secondary system, shall take such street into the secondary system of state highways for maintenance, improvement, construction and reconstruction if such street, at the time of such recommendation, either: (i) has a minimum dedicated width of forty feet or (ii) in the event of extenuating circumstances as determined by the Highway and Transportation Commissioner, such street has a minimum dedicated width of thirty feet at the time of such recommendation. In either case such streets must have easements appurtenant thereto which conform to the policy of the Highway and Transportation Commission with respect to drainage. After the streets are taken into the secondary system of state highways, the Department shall maintain the same in the manner provided by law. Such street shall only be taken into the secondary system of state highways if the governing body of the county agrees to contribute from county revenue or the special assessment of the landowners on the street in question one-half of the cost to bring the streets up to the necessary minimum standards for acceptance. No such special assessment of landowners on ~~ such streets shall be made unless the governing body of the county receives written declarations from the owners of seventy-five percent or more of the platted parcels of land abutting upon such street stating their acquiescence in such assessments. The basis for such special assessments, at the option of the local governing body, shall be either (i) the proportion the value of each abutting parcel bears to total value of all abutting parcels on such street as determined by the current evaluation of the property for real estate tax purposes, or (ii) the proportion the abutting road front footage of each parcel abutting the street bears to the total abutting road front footage of all parcels abutting on the street, or (iii) an equal amount for each parcel abutting on such street. No such special assessment on any parcel shall exceed one-third of the current evaluation of such property for real estate tax purposes. Such streets are eligible under this provision only if neither the original developer, developers, nor successor developers retain a speculative interest in property abutting such streets. For the purpose of this section, ownership or partnership in two or more parcels, or equivalent frontage, abutting such streets, shall constitute speculative interest. Special assessments under this section shall be conducted in the manner provided in Article 2 (§15.1-239 et seq.) of Chapter 7 of Title ~~ 15.1, mutatis mutandis, for assessments for local improvements. C1 Whenever the governing body of a county recommends in writing to the Department of Highways and Transportation that any street in the county be taken into the secondary system of state highways as a rural addition to the secondary system in such county, the Department of Highways and Transportation thereupon shall within the limitation of funds and the mileage limitation of the State Highway and Transportation Commission's policy on rural additions, take such street into the secondary system of state highways as a rural addition thereto for maintenance, improvement, construction, and reconstruction. Any street added to the secondary system under this provision shall be constructed to the Department's standards for the traffic served. Such streets are eligible under this provision only if neither the original developer, developers, nor successor developers retain a speculative interest, as herein defined, in property abutting such streets. D. In instances where it is determined that speculative interest is retained by the original developer, developers, or successor developers and the governing body of the county deems that extenuating circumstances exist, the governing body of the county shall require a pro rata participation by such original s r„! ~.A. --.~ developer, developers or successor developers as a condition of the county's recommendation pursuant to this section. The basis for the pro rata percentage required of such developer, developers, or successor developers shall be the proportion that the value of the abutting parcels owned or partly owned by the developer, developers, or successor developers bears to the total value of all abutting property as determined by the current evaluation of the property for real estate purposes. The pro rata percentage shall be applied to the Department of Highways and Transportation's total estimated cost to construct such street to the necessary minimum standards for acceptance to determine the amount of costs to be borne by the developer, developers, or successor developers. Property so evaluated shall not be assessed in the special assessment for the determination of the individual pro rata share attributable to other properties. Further, when such pro rata participation is accepted by the governing body of the county from such original developer, developers, or successor developers, such amount shall be deducted from the Department of Highways and Transportation's total estimated cost and the remainder of such estimated cost shall then be the basis of determining the assessment under the special assessment provision or determining the amount to be provided by the county when funded from general county revenue under subsection C of ._..~ this section or determining the amount to be funded as rural addition under subsection C1 of this section. E. Acceptance of any street into the secondary system of state highways for maintenance, improvement, construction, and reconstruction shall not impose any obligation on the Commission to acquire any additional right-of-way or easements should they be necessary by virtue of faulty construction or design. F. The local governing body of the county may expend general county revenue for the purposes of this section. F1. The local governing body of the county may permit one or more of the landowners on the street in question to pay to the county a sum equal to one-half of the cost to bring the street up to the necessary minimum standards for acceptance into the secondary system of state highways, which funds the county shall then utilize for such purpose. Thereafter, upon collection of the special assessment of landowners on such street, the county shall use such special assessment funds to reimburse, without interest, the one or more landowners for those funds which they previously advanced to the county to bring the street up to the necessary minimum standards for acceptance. G. Any funds allocated for use within any county for the purpose of adding to the secondary system of highways, if not used by such county for such purpose r" ._ during the fiscal year they are so allocated,may be held for such purpose for the three succeeding fiscal years. (Code 1950, §33.1-72; 1968, c. 601; 1970, c. 322; 1972, c. 393; 1976, c. 391; 1977, cc. 214, 578; 1978, c. 487; 1979, c. 321; 1980, c. 96; 1981, c. 232; 1982, c. 167; 1983, cc. 171, 455; 1984, c. 146.) §33.1-229. Continuance of powers of county authorities; alternative procedure. The local road authorities shall continue to have the powers vested in them on June 20, 1932, for the establishment of new roads in their respective counties, which shall, upon such establishment, become parts of the secondary system of state highways within such counties. They shall likewise have the power to alter or change the location of any road now in the secondary system of state highways within such counties or which may hereafter become a part of the secondary system of state highways within such counties. The State Highway and Transportation Commissioner shall be made a party to any proceeding before the local road authorities for the establishment of any such road or for the alteration or change of the location of any such road. When any such board or commission appointed by the board of supervisors or other governing body of a county to view a proposed road or to alter or change the location of an existing road shall award damages for the right-of-way ~; for the same, in either case to be paid in money, it may be paid by the board of supervisors or other governing body of the county out of_ the general county levy funds. No expenditure by the Commonwealth shall be required upon any new road so established or any old road the location of which is altered or changed by the local road authorities, except as may be approved by the Commissioner. If the property sought to be taken is for the easement or right-of-way, the plat shall reasonably indicate thereon any appurtenant right-of-way or easement for ingress and egress to and from the principal easement or right-of-way being taken. As an alternative to the method of establishing or relocating a road provided in the preceding paragraph, the Commissioner, by and with the approval of the State Highway and Transportation Commission and the board of supervisors or other governing body of a county shall have power and authority to make such changes in routes in, and additions to, the secondary system of state highways from time to time as the public safety or convenience may require. The service of any process or notice in any such proceedings upon the district engineer of the State Department of Highways and Transportation having the supervision of maintenance and construction of highways in any such county shall be termed sufficient service on the Commissioner. (Code 1950, X33-141; 1950, p. 726; 1970, c. 322; 1980j, c. 441; 1984, c. 198.) .~ ~.•• A-62387-4 _ ITEM NUMBER ,` -- "' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: June 23, 1987 SUBJECT: Inclusion of Additional Roads into the Rural Addition Program COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Under Section 33.1-72.1 Cl in the Code of Virginia, Counties are allowed to use a small portion of their Secondary Highway Construction Fund for "Rural Additions". The rural addition program is intended for upgrading certain qualifying roads open to the public prior to July 1, 1977 for acceptance by the Virginia Department of Transportation. Presently, Roanoke County has three (3) prioritized streets in various stages of the rural addition process. Route 603 extension (Cove Hollow Road) has been submitted and approved by the Highway Board. The Highway Department is currently reconstructing the road to Highway Standards. In addition to this project, the Board of Supervisors has prioritized Washington Road and Airpoint Drive. Due to right-of-way problems on Washington Road, this project cannot be submitted to the Virginia Department of Transportation at this time. Airpoint Drive has been shifted to the road bond program. Since the Board of Supervisors should have over $150,000 available to fund Washington Road after July 1, the staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors add additional projects to the Rural Addition Priority List. In the last year, we have received requests from the residents of Sagewood Circle, Byers Road, Bushdale Road, Penwood Drive, Chester Drive and a connecting road from Routes 1890 and 1905 for inclusion into the State Secondary System as Rural Additions. Enclosed for your review is last year's Priority List with status and staff's recommended Priority List for 1987-88. ,~= ~ ,~. L :.._._. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board include Sagewood Circle, Byers Road, Bushdale Road, Penwood Drive, Chester Drive and a connecting road from Route 1890 to Route 1905 in the Hollins Community Project Area in the Roanoke County Rural Addition Priority List. An addition, we recommend that the Board remove Airpoint Road from the Priority List. These projects will be prioritized for construction based on availability of rights-of-way and funds. SUBMITTED BY: ~ ,. Phalli T. H ry P. Direct r of Engi era Approved (X) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to APPROVED: Elmer C. dg County Administrator ACTION Motion by: HCN/SAM to approve staff recommen anon cc: File John Peters Phillip Henry John Hubbard VOTE No Yes Brittle X Garrett X Johnson McGraw X Nickens X Abs X -___=/ 1986-87 Rural Addition Priority List 1. Airpoint Estates; Airpoint Drive Status: This project has been moved by the Board of Supervisors to the 1985 Bond Road Improvement Program. 2. Pinkard Court; Washington Road Status: Serious problems with individual property access and drainage have hampered this project. 3. Route 603 Extension, Cove Hollow Road Status: This project is currently under construction. .. ~ _ y' 1987-88 Rural Addition Priority List 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Connecting Road from Routes 1890 and 1905: This road is part of the Hollins Community Development Project and will serve as a detour during the reconstruction of parts of Route 648. Penwood Drive: This road is located off Route 613 in southwest County and serves five (5) families. All required right of way has been dedicated. Sagewood Circle: This road is located off Route 311 in the Masons Cove area of Roanoke County. All required right of way for a road serving three (3) families has been dedicated. Washington Road: This road is located off Route 220 South and serves three (3) families. Until access to two (2) lots and downstream drainage are resolved, this project will remain unimproved. Chester Drive: This road is located off Williamson Road (Route 11) and serves eight (8) residences. Some additional right of way for a turn around will be required. Byers Road: This road is located off Old Hollins Road (Route 601) in northwest County and serves six (6) families. Problems with right of way and drainage easements could require condemnation proceedings by the Board of Supervisors. 7. Bushdale Road: Five (5) families are served by this road in southeast Roanoke County. The Board may need to consider condemnation to obtain some required right of way. ~ ~ ~^ ,voa ~ s~ ~•' - H W ` 0~ e~n+~ ^ 1 JA ~ A -.~ r cr NUARY I 976 `'y 0 lY Yaiti • ~J S GR~F{IN" i ANNfXATlOIJ a rss~oN.4 s~ ! Mf r.r = ~~ W p jp r ""~ ~ :O y DRrvE -IN -~ . TNERrar L ~ '1400 a° sr" rr 9 1 \ ~ I Ou[" b ~ ~ ~• ~ • , y CLfnRBF00ti o S7aTiGN CmM ~ yIF, ~ ~ _ ~~~ ,~ ~~~ ~ "^ UN11NC ~ ~- NI / TY MAPS _ . VICI ... .. rN~ NORTH W " sze o00 ~`~i>6 f i ie "o ,e~~ 17 b . ° ~' Yep P,`~e. .r \18 ~ ~ ~R 9~. "~ % ~ X151'. "1 ~1 ~ . / ~~ ~ '\'~, ~' c, z~\ r ~ zr' 'o s 13z 0 9~ \ ' 221 i ~1~ e X42 . 'rs 37 °4 ~ a 43 .''s c ~4. ~~ ~ e e a ie ~~ ~ ` ~ fs ~ e I ~~1~ X45 4r ~ ~ he \ ~ ~ o ~ p1. ' ~~ ~• 4 e~ '3 a ra 34 n 24 " - s ~ ra \ /~ ~ 48 ~ a \ ~ ~2~ 49 u ~~e" •`'~ ' " 32 ~ X51 r d 31 53 ~ ' " °°f 3' a 58, °-~ ao e'. a n \~7 ao s s rh ~ 55, e \_ _ P~ Odd ~\4 "o Q~p`M rP O o ,p °°, 4 \ •o ~. ¢~ oy a eo 60 . 61 ~ .• \~2 r o eb ~ ~~ ~J \64 rP \ ~ " \ 8 ~ a a 6~. \ ~ ~ d e ~~pp ~" J p 6 'v 30 O County Schoo/ Boord o/ Roanoke Cwnly 4.50Ac lDl 2.38 Ac ICl i 9 os s d- e ~ ~ ~ \ "o , s 65 '~' 13 14 so ~ ~ ~ 10 l ~ 12 F,, F IS a~ \~1~~' I I r,~ , ~~ 16 II Q ' 37Ac ~ 18 a r l7 r1)' F~~ ~ ~ Quoll Valley Corsdominluma See Ma 87.08 Insert"A" 3 i P ru . ~ F, . ~ I"' 40' l N rb O. C"~ 2 0 2.12Ac ~ m G 7 .L O I Cemebry 1.03Ac ~ ,, i A DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC FACILITIES Washington Road f, 1986-87 Rural Addition Priority List 1. Airpoint Estates; Airpoint Drive Status: This project has been moved by the Board of Supervisors to the 1985 Bond Road Improvement Program. 2. Pinkard Court; Washington Street Status: Serious problems with individual property access and drainage have hampered this project. 3. Route 603 Extension, Cove Hollow Road Status: This project is currently under construction. 1987-88 Rural Addition Priority List 1. Connecting Road from Routes 1890 and 1905: This road is part of the Hollins Community Development Project and will serve as a detour during the reconstruction of parts of Route 648. 2. Penwood Drive: This road is located off Route 613 in southwest County and serves five (5) families. All required right of way has been dedicated. 3, Sagewood Circle: This road is located off Route 311 in the Masons Cove area of Roanoke County. All required right of way for a road serving three (3) families has been dedicated. 4. Chester Drive: This road is located off Williamson Road (Route 11) and serves eight (8) residences. Some additional right of way for a turn around will be required. 5, Byers Road: This road is located off Old Hollins Road (Route 601) in northwest County and serves six (6) families. Problems with right of way and drainage easements could require condemnation proceedings by the Board of Supervisors. 6. Bushdale Road: Five (5) families are served by this road in southeast Roanoke County. The Board may need to consider condemnation to obtain some required right of way. "51 -.~I 1 I [JJ 1~) v yen _. I _ e~r~e~~, ~~ 7S2 c ,o,~~~ ~ ~1 /o ,. ~.,.,.,.[o G \ 60i)- ppl ~y • ~ ~ , ' o i _ , ,ie z ~9 ~ ~J ~ n.. ~8]E, y ° `°J a ~~ a ~ 0 8 ,I i • s A VICINITY MAP o _ ~! I -• ~~0 ~' 601 0~1 ~ IOJ]~ )p. I I B ~ 19UJ i ~ `192• :~_ NORTH ~ ~~ ~ . "6 tS CC 1r e1~' ` . / J\ /6 4 _ I / ~ \ _ ~ 5 ~; ~~ ~~ O e / Q\.\\ F°Oa ,. \\ ~°~ 4 ~ Deg 441 Ac ~ iO~ ~, 4 ~~ ~~;\ ~~ ~ 2 ~ 3 ~ ~ ,z~ ~ ~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ 7 $ r 6 ` ~ • t ,m ~ 1 . ~~ ~ y TF^ ~ r3 6 2~ ~ Q e Z7 7 O~ O ~ ^ \ \\ zs.. 9 ~ /e. ® 2 6 E \ r ` \ ' \ 3 Leo 10 ~. ` , I r ,'' •7 \ ~~ .. ~ ~ O 9 • /' r• '~ ~ 8 • I ~ oc o 2 ~~ ,,e ~ 4 ~ / ~°tl7 Io e ; v ~~~~ ~ • 24 rr IQ -//1 O 2 ~` '' _ ~ 3 /~~ 4 23 \ 8~ 5 ~ „ ~,~ "~ ~ - ~ \ ~O ~ \v ~. 1Ic J in ,.c $ 6 ~ ,J ~ , 3 - - ~e ~ .,~ ~ e ~ 20 14 ' /" 16 4 li ' ,~~ ~ ibo , ~ ~e/HIS ~, 17 ' , I' '° ~ 19 I5 1 \ 15 2 ~ * _ ~ DEPARTMENT OF Z PUBLIC FACILITIES Chester Drive DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC FACILITIES Penwood Drive // DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC FACILITIES Bushdale Road / ~`"~ - u •~ 320 ~.:": ~.~ ~-.:: ::. ;~,,,~r~, U / /1 `~ O >< ~ 698 ~" ° ~• 7n .~ "~" Caq.DO •86~ Oy ~ \~ w i ~.o. ~''~ ~ R I ~ ~~ T 1 ~ 9u ~ ~: sz~ d ' ezz ~a ee3 ra.o^ ~/ 0 o \ ~ ~ ._ ~7E. 1973. 616 ~1 .-.-,..'...=a-~-__ ~ VICINITY MAP ~\ 1.13Ac 3 3 OOAc ~ 6 (~ i 2.04Ac 8 2.IOAc (D) 263 Ac \ (C) 9 \ 1.64 Ac 92 S 82 Ac \ II 1.30Ac • ` t+, 12 9.1 r t5 22 Ac II \ 1.30AC SAt c \ I I 7~ ~ `, Y'Ip~ Ayl~ '. h,,,v,~w atP. ~OJ ^O" P f P`~~ i Br ~_-._ 9 .. ~~ ~V ~ ~ ~ I.20AC ~ e 30 12 - ~' 200 Ac I ~ +` ~ - 3 w~ ~~ I.IBAdDI f I s• '~~au• 1 1 37•:.: 38 39 .I. \ l02 Ac 102Ac \ 41 , ~~ ~ _ / // \ a 2 ~~~ /_l~_____--__ ~ i _--, wane ~ b.y 6 ~'~ 2~~ %' b ~F 38 ~e-:r~ a ee , i ~~ s e ` 3 6 -' r ~ 3~ ~ i 27 ~ 34'` I ~ 66 A: ,~R r `; r ~.i ~ _ e~„ ' ~, . 3i f~ ~ ~~9 I} t]Yl I -~ J~ ~ ~ -< . ~°~ I ~ 25 ~ is l IJSAc ~ 'SOA; 1 ~ Y.. s,,,_ 13 '9 ~~ ~ \ - ' Ir IS .a ~b z, 1 ~ . C\ a 4 ~ a hr :. / \~~' 1 I \ ! , 24 ~~. 10 ioCA: / ~ I ~ ~s~.:_ ~^ 16 I~ / .1L .. - ~_~ 23 ~ 1 e ~ ,~ ~ ~: __ t~, , F i "~ 22 ~ ; ~ '/t. ~° ~ ~ it \ / 19 ~ \ " ~ ~ ,, Q --, o ~. e ~J ~I \`~ -, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC FACILITIES Byers Road A P P E A R A N C `E i2 E Q U E S T PUBLIC HEARING ON E-- y I would like the Chairman of thE: Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the public nearing on the above matter so that I may comment. I agree to follow the guidelines listed below. WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADnP.ESS FOR THE RECORD. 1. Each speaker will have between three and five minutes available whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. 2. Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. 3. All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. 4 . Loth speakers and the a.~d~.enL'e w} 11 °'~'-e~-•., se c!nL?rtesl' 3t :11 times . 5. Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. 6. INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO F.EPRESENT THEM. P L E A S E W R I T E L E G I B L Y NAME : ~D l~l' ~ f~ / ~ (_~~ ~~~~~_~ --~ ADDRESS : ~ ~~~- _. -f~,C'~ h~-~~" ~i )~~ .5~~ n PHONE : ~.~ ~ ~~~-- ~'i 11 - ~ l~ ~, -~ZV=-~'- E? S"S~t~ ~ PLEASE NOTE: (After filling out, give to the Deputy Clerk. Thank you.) A-62387-~.. ~--- ITEM NUMBER.~.::= k. `T'' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: June 23, 1987 SUBJECT: Request for Use of Water from County Stand-by Well COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: C~~~~ SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The George Peoples, owners of the property that surrounds the Schurmann well, have requested to use the well for the pur- pose of supplying water for their livestock. This is the well that contains a high amount of fluoride and cannot be used by the County at the present time. There would be no harmful effects to the well or groundwater if this request is granted. A sign would be posted stating that the water is not for human consumption. The water could not be sold or transported off the property. FISCAL IMPACT: /~~- No County founds required. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the property owner be granted permis- sion to use this well until such time thraot ertmaow er cwoaldbbe for use as a municipal well. The p p Y responsible for all costs associated with electrical service, pumping facilities, and maintenance of the well lot. The County would give the property owner 60 days notice prior to cancelling this permitted use. It is further recommended that the County Administrator be authorized to execute an agreement with the property owner that will permit their use of this well. The intended use of this property for livestock is permitted under the existing zoning. SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED: ~ r '. l~ Cliffo Craig Elmer Ho ge Director of Utilities County Administrator L_ --- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ~ Motion by: HCN/SAM to approve Denied ( ) staff recommendation Brittle Received ( ) Garrett Referred Johnson to McGraw Nickens No Yes Abs X X X X cc: File Cliff Craig John Hubbard ,~ A-62387-6 ITEM NUMBER ~"'~ i AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: June 23, 1987 SUBJECT: Request for Public Hearing pursuant to Section 15.1-238(e> authorizing condemnation and right-of-entry for North Lakes Water Interconnection COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~~t,C,E~hmti`W~tX GU' ~WU'~`^~M.G~nN` ~ ~ V~ fj Y`S 'l1~ ~'r" ~u'~ ~'1nlV~/~~ Ct.•'~.~ lM~ S U C,C.~S S IM CSC ~ ..~. G~S~'1~ 9 " _ , ~~ `J SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Two properties are involved in easement acquisition for the North Lakes Water Interconnection in the area of North Lakes Drive and Peters Creek Road. Discussions and negotiations are ongoing to acquire the easements, but at the present time one or both of the property owners may not agree to the easement acquisition. While staff is continuing the negotiations and hopes to acquire the easements, we would request that the first steps toward condemnation be started. This action could reduce the time frame on this project, which is an important consideration based on previous commitments that this project would be completed by July 1, 1987. If condemnation is required construction will not start until approximately August 15, 1987, with construction completed by September 20, 1987. The North Lakes Water Interconnection involved the construction of a pump station and two sections of water line. This construction will allow the 500,000 gallon Loch Haven water reservoir to be supplied with water from Roanoke City, in addition to the higher quality wells in the area. This reservoir supplies water to the North Lakes Subdivision and other development in this area. FISCAL IMPACT: c.~ Cost of advertisement will be covered by Utility Fund monies. 1 ~.."' - RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that a public hearing be set for the July 14, 1987 Board Meeting to address the subject matter. SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED: ~~ ~ ~ Phillip Henry Elmer C. Hodge Director of Engineering County Administrator ---------------------- ACTION VOTE No Yes Approved (X) Motion by. AHB/SAM to set Public Denied ( ) Hearing on July 13 Brittle X Received ( ) Garrett X Referred Johnson McGraw X to Nickens X cc: File Phillip Henry Paul Mahoney Abs X 2 o ~_""_. o ), ~ s9o God .,~ Is rya ~~ , ..629 •, ~'~ ~ / 1 lypq 1010 ~ 1 M61 M o~ e~ 1731 0 ~ ~ ° ~~357 1 ~ 1~ - ~~ u 4. 1361 • ~ J n , a' 9 oas ~, Site 1732 ~ . oi~ 71) C u~ ~ 1701 ~ % ~ 10 ~d~ ... .. ~ OW 17N 1t ` ... 629 72 7 u` o~ ,~~~~ ova b 11) n~ 1)n~1_ _ .~_.__ ___ _.._ .~ .. _ ~ ,..~ I '~. /fit ._ DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC FACILITIES VICINITY MAP „v~ .. _.. NORTH tt •1 r i NORTH LAKES CPUMP STATION 3 ITEM NUMBER ~ ;~ ~`~ ° ~;~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: June 23, 1987 SUBJECT: Appointments to Committees COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: 1. Recreation Commission: The two-year term of Mr. Hugh Key, representing the Cave Spring Magisterial District expires June 30, 1987. Original terms were staggered, but new terms shall be for three years. Please see the attached for further information. 2. Virginia Western Community College Board The four-year term of Mrs. Sylvia Faw expires June 30, 1987. Mrs. Faw has served two terms and is not eligible for another appointment. Please see the attached for further information. Submitted By: ~_ Mary H. Allen Deputy Clerk Approved by: 1 ~~ ~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ------------------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes A Denied ( ) Brittle _ Received ( ) Garrett _ Referred Johnson _ To McGraw _ Nickens `~ v > ~~ ,\ ~U'" ~O ~~~, o°~' eao~ e5 `~~' Gov es5o o'~ a44o1r~e co~~ e 1911 4 GO rti~ is yr ~~' ,~~ER °~ r ore ege . ~p • ry~J lease o~l~ ire e ~ ~y ati ~r ~o Kati • ti 5 log cl°ar5 0~5. ,, see4eG r ~ 3yey o~ ~~1 f.°~ yr t'4° esy y"~~' ti~ee 'a° ~y 111 y°p 3~ ~ et' ~ r b ~ yrg o . yy ~ ~,'' y° ae r ro `cze aye see r 3 e , you a g° ~,~,e o~ ar3 ~y sae ~r sac leg ~r ar ry • ~ o~ asa for e . yc~ y~ o ~,o~~ °°~ ~, 01 ~~'~ yyo e11°~tie $1°a o~~'eg yr orgy 2Z~5 • Qes l~y~~ 1t'. ° ~ oea'~ ra~'c Spa e~~ ~,~ c o~' 1 ~ c • °~a~ c°~ arr o~'ysa y re a ~'~ tii°r ~ `pry i4a~ 1°~a sa~5 $ . 1 • o~ a ay c Cow` ~yc ~,~ ti ar e~,eo ooh ~yo . ~g dog i°° see ~°s 4°l e ~y 5~'~ e y "ire 4a~ i5ry ea 4 a~~ esati ye asa ocal - y4ati e gir ti ~ o~ veyti~y~a`o ya~y by o~ 04 2 • B he ~ asp'' o~y e et' yyaer Co~ rti e 54e fi~e~ all 4 t~ co1 e ~~ e y~yr e~,o4 ~ ~ota44oL ~ ~'~e 5 a~ca ~yti o~ tir e~,y a aevy~~,ee ~~,e 15 fo 3 . G°e ~° al ye ~°y q s~ o° ov~"ee so4°~a y of. s ey4°r~ 41 aav y a~,3 c~~y~~ s ~c°lat 4 l~a~ ti~I °o~l ~ • Qsogytieo ~yov ~~eye e~ ovs ara ec ~vr~' esr1S oy 3 e~ 5 °'~ all r ~e°~ she c~rcGo~~ a embes ~ yew liege • ~ el° ~ f.°s ~yon5 ~Y,e aerti ' ~ se co ae sa as os sy 11 tY ~Y,e s oq er 1 ~ s e ~ ~ • SG°~vey vest' esv ice 4 ke se 4 o4c lle~e Q local ~ral Jriti~. s ~ aaa 4 ~ 09 ~~ ti~'e era it a ea e~ 6 • c°~ ev le 3ge~ as eg e a d 4s e4 ~ i s b~ s e4 ~ o~ e a v al dial real a5 Q 8 a4 0 leq Qso s ~,~ r 1 1 • b o11e~e lea ~it~ c ~ ar aeo 05 an c 11 seJCO~~ sevl Qseyi lya ~~ act S~'a ~~`e n~ ' ~Y,e lege c°~ vae f a . ~~ s1ae 1 le ~' Y,e ~ °~ rayrg re 5 e4os~s se 5 b ~" o a °~' ~ ' S Res Qa eerve ~ ~si~o1v ~ ie~ ~ e yae~,~, 9• s ev ye se e B o~ ~es4s i e ~oscoileg en o5 ill ~Y,e aiti . Rey4 e~ it o~ av l~ ' sev osti~ s e4 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF" SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE CENTER ON TUESDAY, JUNE 23, 1987COUNTY ADMINISTRATION RESOLUTION N0. 62387-7 APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM J - CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1 • That that certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for June 23, 1987, designated as Item J - Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 8, inclusive, as follows: 1. Minutes of Meeting - May 26, 1987. 2• Acceptance of water and sewer lines serving C. M. Davis Apartments. 3• Acceptance of water and sewer facilities serving Woodbridge Subdivision, Section 8. 4• Confirmation of a District CommissionpothemPlan in the Fifth Planning Recreation Commission g Commission, the Communit . and Virginia Western y College Board. 5• Request for acceptance into the Secondary System for 0.25 miles of Hollyberry Road. 6• Request to amend the Minutes of 12/16/86 and Final Order of JELCO Construction Co., Inc., to delete proffers that do not apply to rezoned property. 7• Request for approval of a Raffle Permit for the Catawba Little League. 8• Request for approval of a Fireworks Display Permit for the town of Vinton. 2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized ~ - AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE 1087TY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JUNE 23, RESOLUTION NO. APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM J - CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That that certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for June 23, 1987, designated as Item J - Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 8, inclusive, as follows: 1. Minutes of Meeting - May 26, 1987. 2. Acceptance of water and sewer lines serving C. M. Davis Apartments. 3. Acceptance of water and sewer facilities serving Woodbridge Subdivision, Section 8. 4. Confirmation of appointments to the Fifth Planning District Commission, the Planning Commission, the Recreation Commission, and Virginia Western Community College Board. 5, Reque~s25fmilescoftHollyber~ytRoadecondary System fo 6, Request to amend the Minutes of 12/16/86 and Final Order of JELCO Constructiontoorezoned~propertyte proffers that do not app y 7. Request for approval of a Raffle Permit for the Catawba Little League. g, Request for approval of a Fireworks Display Permit for the town of Vinton. 2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized ~.: ? -~-~ and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this resolution. r ~ ;' -- - May 26, 1987 Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Roanoke County Administration Cente 3738 Brambleton,Ayenue,,SW Roanoke, Virginia 24018 May 26, 1987 The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors of Roanok County, Virginia, met this day at the Roanoke Count Administration Center, this being the second Tuesday, and the second regularly scheduled meeting of the month of May, 1987. IN RE: CALL TO ORDER Chairman Johnson called the meeting to order at 3:0t p.m. The roll call was taken. MEMBERS PRESENT: MEMBERS ABSENT: STAFF PRESENT: Chairman Bob L. Johnson, Vice Chairman Lee Garrett, Supervisors Alan H. Brittle Steven A. McGraw, Harry C. Nickens None Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator; John M. Chambliss, Assistant Count Administrator for Management Services; Joh R. Hubbard, Assistant County Administrato of Public Facilities; Timothy W. Gubala Assistant County Administrator fo Community Development; Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney, Mary H. Allen, Deput Clerk; Phillip Henry, Director o Engineering; Reta Busher, Director o' Budget and Management; John Peters Assistant Director of Engineering; Joh Willey, Director of Real Estate Assessment Diane Hyatt, Director of Finance; D. Keit Cook, Director of Human Resources; Cliffor Craig, Director of Utilities i IN RE: OPENING CEREMONIES ~~ "'C""_ ~~ _,. May 26, 1987 _- _-- The invoca tion was given by The Reverend Sam Crews Coopers Cove Baptist Church. The Pledge of Allegiance wa recited by all present. II IN RE: COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS Elmer C. Hodge announced that John Willey, Director o] the Real Estate Assessor's Office, has completed all the requirements necessary to become designated an ASA from the American Society of Appraisers. He congratulated him upon receiving this recognition. IN RE: REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS None II IN RE: PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS AND AWARDS County Administrator Elmer Hodge announced that there would be a Resolution of Congratulations presented at the evening session. IN RE: NEW BUSINESS 1. Report on Drainage Chairman Johnson announced this item would be discussed at the evening session. 2. Request to locate the State Forensic Science Laboratory behind Southview School Mr. Hodge advised that the State Department of General Services has outgrown its present Forensic Laboratory and needs to expand. The land behind ~outhview School is particularly suitable because of it's :i~ ,~ May 26, 1987 +~ _ _ ~:; ri. , location near interstate 81, and access is very good for a] localities it serves. It would also be an advantage to the Count when the Public Safety Building is located there. Mr. Hodc recommended that the land be donated to the state for tha purpose, with the understanding that if they don't begi construction within five years, it would revert to the County Mr. Hodge introduced Dr. A. W. Tiedemann, Divisio Director and Steven C. Sigel, Regional Director of the Departmen of General Services, who were present to answer questions. Dr Tiedemann described the organization and activities of the State Division of Consolidated Laboratories. Supervisor Brittle stated he was glad Roanoke Count} had the opportunity to donate the land for this purpose. S»pervisor Brittle moved that the County proceed with the donation of the property and authorize preliminary negotiations with the State to locate the State Forensic Science Laboratory behind Southview School. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Johnson. Supervisor Nickens asked where the soccer fields would be relocated when the land is donated. Supervisor Johnson asked whether the County or School Board owned the land. Mr. Hodge responded that the County became the owners of the land when the Southview School property was transferred from the School Board.1 Mr. Hodge stated that the fields would not be moved for at least two playing seasons, and they may possibly be moved to Waldron Park . Supervisor Nickens also asked if the County was charged fees to use the services of the forensic lab. Dr. Tiedemannresponded that fees are established by the General Assembly at their discretion. Supervisor Nickens asked if it was possible for the County to either receive a reduction in fees or waiver of fees in consideration of donating the land. Dr. Ciedemann answered that this would have to be an action of the 1 y e t n n t i. v ~. i ... ..... .. J ._"" May 26, 1987 General Assembly, but there are no fees for the local government at the present time. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None 2. Re nest for A royal of Pilot Rec clin Project: Director of Utilities Clifford Craig reported that Clean Valley Council has requested that Roanoke County support their pilot recycling project. Homeowners will be provided with three bins to place aluminum, newspaper, and glass which is then placed at the curb for collection. Roanoke County would handle the collection and disposal of this material. Clean Valley Council has received a grant that will pay for the bins and advertising. One of the conditions of the grant is that Roanoke .County agree to support the project. The Resolution of support states that the County will endorse the project if the program is designed so that the County can break even from the sale of the recycled materials. The Regional Landfill Board has agreed to reduce the tipping fees"up to a maximum of $3,000 to cover any loss that may occur. There would be 1,000 homeowners who volunteer to participate in the project. Clean Valley will work with these homeowners. Supervisor Johnson introduced Kelly Whitney from Clean valley Council. Ms. Whitney announced that the resolution of support would be sufficient to continue planning the project. Supervisor Brittle moved to approved the prepared -esolution. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Garrett. RESOLUTION 52687-2 OF SUPPORT FOR PILOT RECYCLING PROJECT WITH CLEAN VALLEY COUNCIL ua us WHEREAS, providing adequate solid waste disposal has become critical problem in the Roanoke Valley; and WHEREAS, the capability of Roanoke County to provide for slid waste management affects the quality of life of County resi- .May 26, 1987 dents and the appeal of Roanoke County to tourists and new Indus try; and WHEREAS, there is a growing awareness that landfills ar difficult and expensive to site, operate, close, and replace and further, that landfills present other hazards, including poten• tial liability to the local governments in the event of grounc water contamination, property damage, or harmful public healtt consequences; and WHEREAS, the General Assembly has recognized the need for, and the public has demonstrated interest in, identifying and pro- moting safe and efficient solid waste management strategies that will reduce dependence on landfills; and WHEREAS, in other states, waste volume reduction through recycling, source reduction, resource recovery and other methods have proven to be an important element of effective comprehensive waste management strategies by extending the life of existing landfills and reducing the need of future landfill capacity; and WHEREAS, the Clean Valley Council and its Valley Recycling Project Committee have developed a pilot project to be conducted in Roanoke County involving the curbside collection of recycla- tiles, including public education activities, to help assess the relative costs and benefits of a recycling program and the will- ingness of Virginia's citizens to participate; and WHEREAS, the Virginia Environmental Endowment has pledged its support and given its "Vote of Confidence" for this project in Roanoke County as offering curbside recycling as a part of the waste management program which will provide additional informa- tion on waste management to other localities throughout Virginia; and WHEREAS, the County of Roanoke desires to express by this resolution its conceptual support, for the pilot project; now, therefore, be it _~ J --- t:. ..~ ~-1 May 26, 1987 RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia that Roanoke County confirms its support for the pilot project of the Clean Valley Council and its Valley Recyclinc Project Committee and offers its operational support in the imple- mentation of the one-year pilot project by providing the cost of service by the Roanoke County Refuse Collection, with the under- standing that the pilot project shall be so designed that the County may reasonably anticipate and project that the cost of collection service will be offset during the course of the pilot project through savings from avoidance of landfill use fees and sale of recyclable materials collected through the project and other financial resources made available by the Clean Valle Council. On motion of Supervisor Brittle, seconded by Supervi Garrett and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None ABSENT: None uest for Approva for the 1987/88 budget• Mr. Hodge reported that if the deca fee increase if approved, the budget appropriation resolutio would be amended to reflect this. He also noted several change from the original budget document. These include a reduction o the Board Contingency fund of $43,058 for salary increases fo those employees at the top of scale; the addition of brus collection using $57,570 funded from fiscal year 1986/87 Ref us Department operating budget; increase in the school appropriatio by $500,000 which includes $350,000 from the sale of land $100,00 from the budgeted beginning balance, and $50,000 from th 1987/88 Board Contingency fund; and the elimination of th Economic Development allocation in the amount of $50,000 to fun $40,000 for purchase of the YMCA property, $3,000 for Blue Rida May 26, 1987 Region Commission dues, and $7,000 addition to Board Contingency fund. Supervisor Nickens asked if all the funds for economic development was eliminated. Mr. Hodge responded that it was, but that $40,000 was for purchase of land at Spring Hollow for the reservoir. Supervisor Nickens advised he was concerned that there will be no funds available for economic development projects when this was a priority category of the Board members. Supervisor Nickens also wondered what would happen to the School Board budget if the $350,000 sale of land was not - accomplished. Mr. Hodge answered that the sale of the old Courthouse was going on schedule. There is a purchaser interested on the other sale, and this should be concluded within the next few weeks. He has informed Bayes Wilson that there may be a shortfall if this land is not sold, and they will look at the budget at that time. Mr. Wilson was present, and stated that if there is a shortfall, they will look at the problem at that time, and make adjustments as necessary. Supervisor Nickens asked if the School budget could cover such a shortfall. Mr. Wilson said he hoped that they could. Supervisor Johnson asked County Attorney Paul Mahoney if he and Supervisor Brittle have to abstain from this vote due to a possible Conflict of interest. Mr. Mahoney responded that they may vote on issue but must make disclosure of any conflict. Supervisor Johnson announced that his spouse is employed as a teacher at Cave Spring Hiqh School. Supervisor Brittle announced that his wife is employed also as a teacher at Cave Spring High School. Supervisor Garrett moved to approve the prepared appropriation resolution for the budget for fiscal year 1987/88. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Johnson. ~:; ~~ J Nf50LDlI0I N0. 52687-3 ~, ~ It naol~ad bF tb~ Noud ai.SnP~rri+ora of tM Comte it Noaaoko, irgiaia, that tho tollo~iaT aPP°Priatlau tte banbT ado traa tho . h+Pectin lmd~ toe tJw parlod oodi~ Jm~ 30, 1988, foe tbo tmotiooa pm9oaes indleatedl PENSONAEL OPERAriNO CAPITAL »}•~ ~.~ OENEPAI, 14ND , 80ARD OF SOPF3ILSORS 86,66D i0 ~ ' CO ADNlNIS1iAlON . 150 147,2!5 ADIIINISIYIlION CODNi! NOIRD ~~ 112.643 . 14.100 600 •' 137,3!3 u1roRMAria E tEEERRAL I~SOrNLT le,oso u,les . • 31,215 ADtlINIblRAZION EBPLOl1= !£IIIIONS 140.!07 ~ ,~: 19.472.. 169 879 39lAININO 2S,lll .. , 25 914 conNnr AlEOPNE! EL17ClIONS ' 326,893 1,775.. 32.620 ~ , 1,776 (32 0951 126 ~ RDOI3141ri0N ET.EClIONS ~ 12.260 29.7!1 ~~ . .!13 ~~ ~ 44.326 15,275 • 312,0!8 •~ CONNOIYFJLlN S l1lOQNE! 235,923 • :~~? 150,524 • . .' ~ 59,601 43,997 !30,4!2 OPERAriONS ,... TIClIN/NISNESS P200RAM 259,1!7 ~: 16,100 275 547 CONl1ISSIONEY OF NETENOg 2.500 7.500 , 10,000 ADMINISlYAlION 77,100. . 1 575 ' . REAL FSiA~ PERSONAL PROPE3!! . 61,671 . 12,529 78,675 905INES5 LICENSN 134,311 ~ 65 250 70,658 ~ 75,200 20!,989 CLERt OF 18E CIPCOI! COUNT . 14'247 -. 79,497 P08LIC NFCOR05 MICROFiIlI 287,936 85.031 •~ 746 POLICIAO 6 INTISl10AlIN0 37,950 ~•~! 421 373,713 ADMINISlNAflpN 73.7!0 ClYIL DlYISION 1!0.589 536,131 38.700 53 150 179,[89 UNIFORM DITISION DElECI[YE DITISION 1.237,895 . 235,788 186,060 589,181 SERVICES DIYISI011 677,131 93,619 1'u9 1,639,7!3 1YllNSPORlIIOr SAFE!! COl1MISSI01 565,211 88,025 773,119 6 CARFJCONFINEM}3fT OP PRISONERS 53,136 CiRCOI! COUNT 1,493,529 319,42! 960 GENERAL DISlNICf LOUR! 6'~ 9,214 1,812,958 NACISlNA18 ISO 2 ,910 •• 99,639 ~~ J 6 D RELATIONS COOK! 730 239 25,060 pROgAIION 6,516 969 E7(PENDINRES: - ~ 39,175 6,516 ASS! CO ADNIN NO! SYCS - 39,175 000NlE ASSESSOR 61,81! ° 19,813 • ADMINIS'lNAlION / 80,632 ~155NEN! 177.670 36,911 ~ 4 551 SOARp OF EOOALIZAlION 298,412 44082 . 31 200 219,033 FINANCE 10,913 , 373,694 ACCOUAiINC 10,913 PAiEOLL 196,265 91,039 MANICENEN! AND SUDCE! 48,564 14,320 ~. ~ 288,30! PROCORE!!E9! SEtTICFS u'~' 11,955 ~ »0 63,161 161,785 39,5 80,364 201,321 r:'." ---- PIFB AalutlruiIa 17,192 FILE soPPD>:ata 710,047 . r1Dr ~vl~rlor .. lo,s23 lYIINI~i rDC81IC16 SE89ICES 28,725 53 005 PLIYIIYO ~ BFSEAIICA . 31.504 1ESCDE SOOAD 0P13An01LS Qty S1Y-IC15 143 S Qk3tCQICr`S}3YYICES 179.727 PLWII81 DP1~AnOws 1lZIltDOQ u,417 S . 8trF3Iits ul~' 97.161 43,155 ISST CO ADBII P08LIC FICiLIIIES ~~ ''~ TtOADYAI 97,404 27,745 SlIEQ ~~~ ' '° ~' 101,566 IIF8511 COLLECrfa OPEtAlI015 •. SFSOBICQIr1118IAL 856,264' '430.454 90,000 FJICUff3I1C 30,1/t 7S,Oa F110Illffi110 189,322 20.915. . DtAFTIYC i 1tEC01DS 70.820 8.064: S 7a COMSIIIOCIIa INSPDC2ION 99,961 11,254 , 7 100 IOlD9AI .39.196 4.195 ~ , ~ BBILDINGS 8 09088DS .. ~~ 123,122 12,439 /BILDIMO el[YiFd11CB 403,172 493,808 ~~ MAIIIE7INCE 340,190 q,{45 LF1F COLLECilOM 40,000 PA9KS 6 81iC9EAT108 COBMUIIII F31UCAiI01 53,599 300 LEISUIE ACIIYIiIFS 85,135 Sp0 OBID008 ADV13trUPll .24,733 1,908 SQIIOI CIIIZQIS 66,868 2,250 SPECILL IEVEMIS 52.241 2,350 IBEtAPQIrICS 95,973 13,114 ADDLr Ar8Lr:1'ICS 64,727 3,301 .. IOUIB IIBLk7'ICS 146,768 10,000 IDBIBISiRAI108 PUBLIC r1AMSPOQIAIf 191,283 226,272 18,325 a ExP~lofr0lFS: PUBLIC BfaLrp ~I'~ SEYlCfS ADBIYISTBAIIOM 1 459 796 PUBLIC LSSISSIIIkI , , IU7IMIOIU CA1S soclu sJS9tcs acuturloYs 808111 tFSOBpCF COBIIIirf[ 155! W 1D1I8 ~ PLU11IM6 C 2aI1ti 12.515 1DBI8 6.COIQIUBIlr SQ2YICFS 83 233 LLB ~ 8 ~~ C018-011Ir1 D1111:LOlMIErT , 19,696 201!80 08DI811C8 32,394 1xOe0MIC D1Y}ypp8}7! 8,900 p~~ IEYIE9 30,878 PQBIIIS D 1tE9I1Y COOlt0I11T01 59,082 41 99! PLIDII oo~aasla . coYStYacrla louotrc SEIYICfS 15,560 ADUwsrDAna IUPlxfIO~ 36,385 PAtC DEYEfOPBFJr 135.142 , 45,948 _ .'*~ . 37,676 241,080 ' 218.500 s,oa u,ba 36,410 11,396 101,650 1.206 2,455 . 38 59,260 e,s2s ns 3,uo . 200 s,soo 3,9ao . . 387,016 254,915 126,406 u,ooo 94,914 20.000 25.042 18,436 3,600 2,500 30,000 61,375 2,085 1,400 :,700 7s5o 21,203 3.332 13,804 a7,14u cee,21o1 136,0521 152,444) 100,767 1,172,627 99,123 76,530 1SA,861 33,959 202,798 168,527 25,007 9,{00 lu,2z3 loe,ool 301,566 1,376,71A 105,148 122,027 48,532 66,578 44,791 136,261 897,680 428, 035 40,000 53,699 BS,e3S 26,641 69,118 54,591 lo9,oe7 se,oze 156,768 435,880 0 387,016 1,728.545 826,406 48,000 94, 984 20,000 107,557 101,669 93,296 34,894 31.900 92,253 61,167 43,398 le,zbo 43,935 156,345 49,280 ,.b .... ~_ . st -- - I~IRARC - -- - IDUIILSIEATIOt ~ 97.336 tisElRCf i CIECOLATIOM _ - - --- 35.892 ~+iL ~~ 605,858 IODG EDe<'1TI01 260.5!2 4,135 ~ ~•~ ~~ 81,623 66! 3!9 s,17o e,soo . 1 . . ,~ IBAOEDRA pppD~ 808,380 NISCELLAItF00S T9A85 ib DEB! S67JCd-CFImt1L 540,675 TRANS 1'0 DEBT SEYICE-SCSOOL • . TpLLSF}2 Zb CAPJTAU TRAl15F1Z TO SC600IS lRANSFQ ~ TODlf 119E! II TO INTERNAL SERIICB . ~ cAPITU FDND ~ coNr tNCEUT •'r ~~ DEBT FOND . CEl1ERAL FOND OBLIGATIONS SCNOOL FOND OBLIGATIONS REYElIOE SNARING FUND . , TOOTH NAYEN II FUND EXPEMDITORESt IRTERNAI, SERVICE FOMD DAU PROCl:SSINO IDNINISTEATION OPF2ATIORS DEYELOPN131T YFBICLE P001 COtlIfOIICATIONS uPlrAC FnrD IRILITT CAPIlA1, FOND OTILIIT FORA OT1L1T: euL1No coLCECStoNS . NttEt eFaDINa NISZRATIONOPERATIONS ~~ OPEEIlIONS ST5T171 SEVER OPl>Z,ItI SL1Et NAIIfENANCg SSE/R N~-~~TU-vATEE NON-DEPAR~~-SEP13 3,203,87! 1,027,2!! .~ 218,905 80,690 133,228 870,535 • 71.200 95,293 66!.3!9 808,380 0 5!0,675 2,777,160 2,777,160 938,685 938,685 290,110 190,110 25,!66,000 25,!66,000 72,239 72,239 2!6,321 ~ 1!6,321 !0,000 !0.000 13,942 11,912 53,258,528 3,203,87! l,on,24! 150,000 150,000 299,595 91,871 !,470 3,688 91,264 219,421 103,546 7eS0 12,500 103,036 12,116 219,426 i 17,uo s!o lo,soo u7,eu e2,16s ~,~ u,s54 n,BSo 313,355 290,110 290,110 40,000 40,000 Bs,3os 49,693 9o,su l S10 6,625 182.441 , l,S00 68,703 U1,789 39,215 ~ 7,500- . 272.232 1,438,761 188,574 245.784 291.716 102,155 1.710,973 . 100,061 960,E 639,655 194.257 129,692 13p,D00 1.060,387 16S,IU 313,120 70,250 !53,9!9 • 551.205 1,088,527 113,006 1,201,533 834,082 113,006 947,088 ~•"• -- - -- - ~ CLASSES N1xQFATION •FOND - coNNDNIn EDDCATIa 3z,s54 7,000 1,000 to;S51 LEISUNE ACilgtilFS 24,537 17,513 /,000 16,080 OUIDOa ADYENi08E %/ 17,387 1,000 - 19,351 5171!08 CITIZENS 6,129 18,727 2,000 27,156 SPECIAL EYEYTS 1,072 6,600 1,100 9.072 t8E8APE0TICS 3,215 - 3,215 1.000 7.500 ADULT ATNLEIICS 27,227 13,115 1,000 • U,672 TOUiN IiNLETIC5 1,060 1,060 ADNINI5i8ATIa 2,111 1,689 !00 7,500 GARAOE FOND - ~~ppp SCHOOL OPE9ATIN0 FUND 53,6&1,319 SCHOOL BUS FUND 150,000 SC300L CAFETENIA FUND 2,731,000 SCHOOL FIDERAL P80O8AN5 FOND 1,011,156 REGIONAL SPECIAL EDDCATION FUND 618,680 SCHOOL CAPt11L INP80YENENTS fUNO 1,941,000 SCHOOL LITENANI LOAN FUND 1,318,060 SCHOOL TEliB00C FUNO 111,003 . 131,558,500 9EYENUESs , OEAERA, FUND• ~ 53,258,528 DEBT FOND 1.231.118 BEYEIOE SNA8IY0 NID 150.000 IOOiN NAYEN II F010 299.595 INTL4NAI, SEQYICE POND ~ 191.178 •CAPIi1L FUND ~ 290,110 OiILIn FUND 7,011.501 FE8 CLASSES - NDCBEITION FOND 199,915 CABACE fOND• 2k,000 SCHOOL OPEBATINO FOND '• 53,681,319 SC80OL~ IDS FOND ~ 150.000 SCHOOL CAFNZEYII l9ND 2,731,000• SCHOOL FEDEFAL Pl;OONANS F9ND ~ 1,041,156 EECIOIAL SPECIAL EDOCAi1a FOND 648.680 SCHOOL CAPITAL INPEOYENI>fiS FOND 1,941.000 SCHOOL LIiFYIEI fAU FOND ~ 4,3{8.060 sCNaoL iE:ilooc FaND ~ u1,oo3 • ~ ' .131,558,507 scsssusus~ % it farther reaolwd: • that tbs Camq Idaialstntnr aF artioriie tie traasfrr of e7 raepubered balaoee or portion tMreof• tra nee elassitiatior of rapeditrn to aeoties rlthia the aau departseat or ageoeY. tbu tie Camt7 idriaistratos uF trarsfee rD tr 010.000 fro tie daaaeaahered balsas of the apprrpciatire oL ere departaet or rlgeneF to sootier departaet or agercT, laclydisq the i ~ aeoorat eeaepwd L tin NorDiPsthattl appropriation. that all Loaded ortitardirg ee<sabcaaoes, boti operating ad capital, at Jee 30,1987 are resppropriatad to tin 1917-81 !!sal roe to t!a soar depatamt ad aoeaut !or rhieh tlulr an ecaeband Lahr pnrioai ru. .. . that appropriatiaei deigeated for spits! prol~cts rill rot Lpa at tie and of the fiscal Iut brt shall resin appeopriated rani W oonplettoa of tb peo3rot a< rrtil tis Hoard of Saperrisors, bF appcopriatr Oraeirtia, eiaags or rliuutes tin appsnpriatios. Dpn. aosplaeim of a apitil pro~rot, tutt u artboriaad to cloa..ort tie proleec and transfer to tie fording ialca raF reaaielnq ialaras. !iii arctim applie to appropriations far Capital Pro~eots at >ra 30,19e7 sae appcopriatioaa i. tie 19q-It budget. On motion of Supervisor Garrett, seconded by Supervisor Johns , and upon the following recorded vote:. AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, Johnson NAYS: Supervisors McGraw, Nickens ABSENT: None Ji.~: ~. °_ May 26, 1987 5. Request for Approval of Employee Classification lan for fiscal ear 1987 88: Director of Human Resources eith Cook advised that this Plan incorporates the classified and unclassified positions previously approved by the Board. Mr. ook noted that the salaries for Board members is adopted by ordinance and salaries for unclassified position are approved either by the Board of Supervisors or by the County dministrator. Supervisor Johnson asked how many new positions have been added. Mr. Cook responded that two communications dispatchers, one commuter operator, and one communications technicians. Four positions have been deleted including the Transportation Coordinator, Public Information Officer and Motor quipment Operator I and II. The net addition is zero. Supervisor McGraw asked how salaries in Roanoke County compare to the City of Roanoke. Mr. Cook answered that starting pay is close, but the County is behind at the top scale. Mr. ook also stated there will be an internal pay study during the next year. Supervisor Johnson asked where we compare with the City of Salem. Mr. Cook responded that we are probably ahead of the City of Salem. ~ Supervisor Johnson moved to approve the Classification Plan for 1987/88. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Brittle nd carried by the following recorded vote: YES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson AYS: None BSENT: None 6. Approval to Request Va Department of rans ortation for Matchin Funds for Burnham Road: Assistant irector of Engineering John Peters reported that Supervisor arrett and he had met with the citizens on Burnham Road concerning the condition of the road. .After explaining the ptions for upgrading their road, the residents chose a May 26, 1987 _..i " _R __ --- - preference for the County to request matching funds from the Highway Department along with their contribution of $5,642 tc upgrade the road from surface treatment to plant mix. The road will then be paved by late summer or early fall of 1987. Supervisor Garrett moved to approve the request. The motion was sec^^,a?d by Supervisor Brittle and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None ABSENT: None 7. Approval of Funding Priorities for Secondary Highway Six Year Plan• John Peters advised that each year, the Board of Supervisors establishes a priority list for the Six-Year Plan. Every two years, the 'Six-Year Plan is redone to establish the list that will be prioritized later. Zn September, the General Assembly approved a tax increase earmarked for transportation improvements. The Highway Board made the decision that the Six-Year Plans are not to be revised until the fall of 1987. Consequently, the priority list is important because of the large amount of money to be allocated to the existing projects. The County Staff and Highway Department has prepared a priority list of projects already on the Six-Yea r Plan, and are requesting preliminary board approval of the priority list so that the Highway Department will have it by June 1, 1987. There will be a public hearing on June 23, 1987 prior to final approval. Supervisor Johnson reported he was concerned that because of additional funds, the public will perceive that roads will be improved quicker, but that is not the case, because there is no additional staff to expedite the projects. ~j Supervisor Nickens moved to approve the funding)) priorities of the Six-Year Plan contingent upon the public) s ,,~ May 26, 1987 hearing to held on June 23, 1987. The motion was seconded b~ Supervisor McGraw. RESOLUTION N0.52687-6 APPROVING CONSTRUCTION PRIORITIES FOR THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY SYSTEM FOR ROANOKE COUNTY FOR FISCAL YEAR 1987-88 BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. The Board does hereby establish for fiscal year 1987-88 those certain construction fund priorities for the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary SyS~.~„; of Highways in Roanoke County as set out on that certain list of priorities with recommended amendments as presented to the Board at its meeting' on May 26, 1987; and 2. That a copy of this resolution duly attested be forthwith forwarded to the Virginia Department of Transportation Salem Residency. office along with a duly attested copy of sai priority list with amendments by the Clerk to the Board. On motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by Supervisor McGraw and carried by the,-following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None ABSENT: None s. Request for Authorization to Establish a Water System for Thousand Oaks Subdivision• Director of Utilitie Clifford Craig reported that Don Bandy, the developer of thi subdivision has requested that the County extend an existin water line for this subdivision. The County will not approve th extension at this time due to a planned re-alignment of Yello~ Mountain Road. The County has suggested that Mr. Bandy establis' a new water system and put in a storage facility. Upo, completion, he would turn the water system over to the County a1 no cost and the County would pay for the cost of wells anc storage. May 26, 1987 Supervisor Nickens moved to authorize the County Administrator to execute an agreement with the developer as provided by the Water Ordinance, and the terms agreed to by the County and Mr. Bandy. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Johnson and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: SuperviJJlj Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None ABSENT: None ~. y. xe uest for A royal to transfer Hollins Water System to Hollins Community Development Corporation Assistant County Administrator Timothy Gubala reported that a requirement of the grant from the Farmers Home Administration is that the Hollins Community Development Corporation own the water system. Roanoke County will continue to operate the system. Supervisor Johnson moved to authorize the Count Administrator to execute the necessary documents to transfer the Hollins Water System to the Hollins Community Development Corporation. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Brittle. Supervisor Nickens asked when this water system woul revert back to the County. Mr. Craig responded that when the loan is paid back, the system will revert back to the County. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None ABSENT: None IN RE: REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS None IN RE: REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS None IN RE: APPOINTMENTS II k; ~.,.~ - ,May 26, 1987 No nominations for appointments were made. Supervisor ickens announced that Sylvia Faw, a member of the Virginia estern Commuity College Board has served two terms and is not ligible for reappointment. RE: REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS Supervisor Brittle asked Director of Engineering ~hillip Henry to check on the timing of the *r~ffic lights on oute 419, particularly at the Chaparral Drive intersection and he Ogdon Road intersection. Supervisor Brittle also asked staff to see if portable ohns have been installed at the recreation fields at Clearbrook ark . i Supervisor Garrett asked about the flourescent paint on curbs. It is especially bad to see during rain storms. Supervisor McGraw announced that the Equestrian :enter plans are moving along and the brochures are now ready. supervisor McGraw also announced he has met with Bernard Langheim ~f Cox Cable TV, and he has outlined plans to offer cable TV ervice to rural areas who don't meet the requirements. This ill include a shared cost with the resident. Supervisor Nickens announced that the CORTRAN Task orce has met again and is still investigating long-term olutions to providing service. He will have a full report soon. Supervisor Johnson announced he is concerned that esidents of the County are not purchasing County decals. He ould like to see a reciprocal agreement with other valley ~vernments whereby each locality would report vehicles without ^oper decal to the appropriate government. RE: CONSENT AGENDA May 26, 1987 Supervisor Nickens moved to approve the Consent Agenda. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Johnson. RESOLUTION N0.52687-8 APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM J - CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That that certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for May 26, 1987, designated as Item J - Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 6, inclusive, as follows: 1. Minutes of Meeting - April 14, 1987 2. Request to classify Eastern Bypass as a "Rural Other Principal Arterial" and add to the Federal Aid Primary System" 3. Revision of the Secondary Highway System concerning alteration of Route 711. 4. Acceptance of Water facilities serving Edinburgh Square. 5. Acceptance of Water and Sewer facilities serving Kingston Court, Section 1. 6. Approval of Special Leave Extension for Workers' Compensation Injury. 2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this resolution. On motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by Supervisor Johnson and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson NAYS : None ABSENT: None LN RE: CITIZENS COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS J £, I 3!. ~` ,~.. 3" ~: a -.J May 26, 1987 None IN RE: REPORTS The following reports were received and filed: 1. Board Contingency Fund 2. Unappropriated Fund Balance 3. Income Analysis and State of Expenditures as of April 30, 1987. IN RE: EXECUTIVE SESSION At 4:20 p.m., Supervisor Johnson moved to go into Executive Session pursuant to the Code of Virginia, Section 2.1-344 (a) (1> to discuss a personnel matter and (6) to discuss pending litigation. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Brittle. IN RE: OPEN SESSION At 5:10 p.m., Supervisor Johnson moved to return to Open Session. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Brittle. IN RE: RECESS At 5:15 p.m., Chairman Johnson declared a dinner recess. CN RE: CALL TO ORDER At 7:04 p.m., Chairman Johnson called the meeting back :o order . N RE: RESOLUTIONS, PROCLAMATIONS, RECOGNITIONS AND AWARDS May 26, 1987 ~~ -- ----- __------ ~ - -- --_ 1. Resolution of Congratulations to the Rock Drill Division of Ingersoll-Rand• Chairman Johnson presented a resolution to Mr. Joe P. Handerhand and Mr. Steve Goldfarb of Ingersoll-Rand, congratulating them for winning the 1986 United States Senate Productivity Award for implementation of a performance bonus plan. Mr. Handerhand and Mr. Goldfarb were both present and thanked the Board for this recognition. They also thanked the employees at Ingersoll-Rand for their commitment to the program. Supervisor Johnson moved to approve the prepared (resolution. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Brittle. RESOLUTION 52687-9 OF CONGRATULATIONS TO THE ROCK DRILL DIVISION OF THE INGERSOLL-RAND COMPANY FOR WINNING THE 1986 UNITED STATES SENATE PRODUCTIVITY AWARD BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke) County, Virginia, as follows: WHEREAS, the Rock Drill Division of the Ingersoll-Rand ,Company is located in Roanoke County and provides employment for over 525 people in the Roanoke Valley; and WHEREAS, Ingersoll-Rand is renowned world-wide for its engineering excellence and exceptionally high quality products;) and WHEREAS, in 1986 the Rock Drill Division Performance Bonus Plan was implemented in Roanoke County to create a commitment by all Rock Drill people to competitiveness, improved performance and cost reduction; and WHEREAS, this plan provides a monetary reward to employees who meet or exceed the business goals set, and gives them an opportunity to become "partners" in the business; and WHEREAS, the Rock Drill Division of Ingersoll-Rand Company has received the 1986 United States Senate Productivity) Award for implementation of this plan. ~._i .May 26, 1987 - _ __._._ -- THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of supervisors of Roanoke County congratulates the Rock Drill )ivision of Ingersoll-Rand for receiving this high honor; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors ~f Roanoke County extends its best wishes to Joe P. Handerhand, teve Goldfarb, and all the employees of Ingersoll-Rand for ontinued success in their endeavors. On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor rattle and carried by the following recorded vote: YES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson AYS: None BSENT: None RE: NEW BUSINESS 1. Report on the Drainage Study (Held over from the afternoon session: Mr. Hodge reported that approximately 30 lays ago, many residents appeared before the Board asking for assistance in dealing with their flood and drainage problems. once that time, County staff members have met with the ieighborhoods involved and have prepared a study concerning these problems. This study is specifically prepared on the Palm 'alley/Kentland neighborhoods. The study outlines the esponsibilities for flood and drainage control, identification f some of the issues involved, and recommends short term and ong term solutions. Following presentation of this report by taff, there will be a first reading of an ordinance increasing he decal fee. $200,000 raised from the fee will be earmarked to stablish a drainage program. There will be a second reading of his ordinance on June 9, 1987. At that time, there will also be work session on this issue. Director of Engineering Phillip Henry and Assistant irector of Engineering John Peters presented the results of the May 26, 1987 -- -- _ - _ comprehensive study that the Engineering staff with assistance from other agencies and department has prepared. Mr. Henry reported that the emphasis of the study was two prong: (1) looking at drainage of a general nature for the Roanoke Valley, and (2) dealing more specifically with the Palm Valley and Kentland areas. Mr. Henry turned to program over to Mr. Peters who presented an outline of the report, including maintenance responsibility, necessary ordinances, the issues involved, and both short and long term solutions. They also presented financial alternatives, and outlined the problems in specific areas and other problem areas in the County. Following this, they presented conclusions and recommendations. Supervisor Johnson asked County Attorney to check th legality of a drainage utility fee. He also asked if matchin funds from the County and VDOT could be used to replace a bridge. Mr. Peters answered that this could be done. Supervisor Johnso also asked if the homes in Palm Valley would considered in flood plain and eligible for possible grants for relocation, floodproofing, etc. Mr. Peters responded that the homes alon Carvin Creek are in the flood plain. Supervisor Johnson als asked staff to investigate the fiscal impact of exoneration o real estate taxes for those individuals who were flooded Supervisor Johnson asked several other questions concerning th report. Supervisor Garrett thanked the staff and variou agencies who worked on the report for such an comprehensiv study in such a short amount of time. He asked Mr. Peters if th staff considered the Palm Valley and Kentland the number on priority to use the $200,000 funds. Mr. Peters responded tha within the time frame available, they could only do a detaile study on these two areas, however, staff recommends that the address these first. During the year, they will do a mor J_'~ ~_ _.. May 26, 1987 __ --- - __ -___ _. -r __ ._._ detailed review of other areas, and also hold community meetings to find out problem areas. Supervisor Brittle stated he was concerned about several issues. He asked if the homebuilders are aware of this study. Mr. Peters responded they have made them aware that a draft of a drainage ordinance is available. Supervisor Brittle also asked the County Attorney to investigate ways in which the real estate taxes could be lowered for this problem. Supervisor Brittle advised that he agreed that the Palm Valley area was the most serious in the County. However, he felt that certain criteria should be established, before prioritization. Supervisor Johnson asked the staff to bring to the work. session a list of projects that were funded with the $200,000 appropriated for drainage in the 1986/87 budget. Mr. Hodge asked the Board to maise a ;:;:vision now to address the areas outlined in the report in order to take advantageous of the construction season. He stated that at the work session on June 9th, they would bring the immediate solutions to these prob~.ems, and work on the other long-range solutions over the next several months. Supervisor Brittle again stated he was concerned about prioritizing beyond the Palm Valley area until they know which are the most serious problems as far as health and safety are concerned. Supervisor Garrett responded that he felt it was now time to prioritize and begin immediately. Supervisor Garrett moved that contingent upon the passage of the first and second reading of the ordinance to raise the decal fees, the first $200,000 funded from the increase be 3esignated to work on the flooding and drainage problems in the Palm Valley and Kentland areas. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Johnson. The motion was carried by the following recorded vote: ,YES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, Nickens, Johnson May 26, 1987 --- -- _ u. .-- _ - -- -- NAYS: McGraw The following citizens spoke regarding the flooding and drainage problems and expressed appreciation to the Board for attempting to solve their problems. 1. Minnie Reynolds, 30 Orlando Avenue N. E. 2. Franc Thomas, 102 Return Road 3. C. Wayne Boitnott, 3448 South Park Circle S. W. 4. Ellen Wallace, 3626 Kentland Road, S. W. Mr. A. J. Bertolacci, 2709 Tanglewood Drive, S. W. also spoke and stated he felt that $200,000 was very inadequate. He pointed out that valley cooperation was necessary to solve the problem. He also suggested corporate donations and lobbying for state funding or additional taxing powers. He advised the problems in his area, Penn Forest, are primarily underground and not surface water. He requested that the Board stop all further building permits in the Starkey area until the problem is solved, and address further the problem of sewage backup in all areas of the County. RE: FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance amendinc Section 12-28 of the Roanoke County Code to increase the annual license tax on motor vehicles: County Attorney Paul Mahoney advised this ordinance increases the annual license tax or decal fees for vehicles from $15.00 to $20.00. It substantially increases the tax on trucks. It also allows exemptions for certain categories such as prisoners of war, recipients of the medal of honor, disabled veterans, and reduced fees for national guard members. The affective date of the proposed ordinance is July 1, 1987, but the Eees would not be received until May 1988. Supervisor Johnson moved to approve the first reading ~f the ordinance. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Garrett. ~1~ ~f May 26, 1987 -- ---_ __ _ _ R _ - - Supervisor Johnson noted that the recommendation includes that $60,000 be set aside to find a funding method for CORTRAN outside of the annual budget process. Supervisor Nickens pointed out this will attempt to help solve two problems, drainage and flooding, and possible funding of CORTRAN transportation for the elderly and handicapped. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None 2. Ordinance authorizin the Ac uisition of Easements for the 1987-88 Re lacement Im rovement Water Proiects: Mr. Mahoney reported that this ordinance authorizes the County Administrator to acquire the necessary easements for .eight water projects. Supervisor Nickens moved to approve the first reading of the ordinance. The motion was seconded by Supervisor McGraw and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnsor. NAYS: None Ordinance to increase th the Board of Su ervisors of Roanoke Count ursuant to Section 14.1-46.01:1: Mr. Mahoney advised that both the State Code and County Charter provide a procedure for increasing the salaries of board members. This ordinance authorizes up to a five percent salary increase based upon the annual inflation factor. It increases the salary of each board member by $380 and provides additional compensation for both the Chairman and Vice Chairman. Supervisor Brittle asked that since he must declare his wife's profession to vote on the school board budget is he required to also state that he is a board member in order to vote .o increase his salary. Mr. Mahoney answered that this is not iecessary. May 26, 1987 ~..~ +" -- -- - Supervisor Brittle moved to approve the first reading of the ordinance. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Nickens and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None 4. Ordinance authorizing the Vacation and Relocation of a portion of a water line easement, Ozanich Property: Mr. Mahoney reported that the relocation was necessary for the Ozanichs to construct a garage on their property. Supervisor Brittle moved to approve the first reading of the ordinance. The. motion was seconded by Supervisor Nickens and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None 5. Ordinance authorizing the County Administrator to accept the donation or dedication of Utility and Right of Way Easements and im rovements Therein• Mr. Mahoney announced this ordinance would allow the County Administrator to accept utility easements and rights of way and remove them from the reading of ordinances process in the agenda. Instead, they would become a part of the Consent Agenda. Supervisor Johnson moved to approve the first reading of the ordinance. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Nickens and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None 6. Ordinance authorizin the Purchase of a water Storage Reservoir Site• Mr. Mahoney stated that the Utility Department has determined location of sites for the construction of future water storage reservoirs. They are ?roposing to purchase one of the sites located off Sugar Loaf Mountain Road. Staff has negotiated a purchase price of $5,000 ~,--~`_ May 26, 1987 `or this site, and the County Assessor's office considers this price reasonable. Supervisor Garrett moved to approve the first reading ~f the ordinance. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Brittle nd carried by the following recorded vote: YES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson AYS: None RE: SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance amending Chapter 13, "Offenses liscellaneous° Sections 13 and 14 of the Roanoke Count Code ~oncerning Unlawful Disposal of waste materials and Unlawful ,ccumulations of trash and weeds: This ordinance will treamline several sections of the County Code and make them yore enforceable. Supervisor McGraw moved to approve the second reading f the ordinance. The motion was seconded by Supervisor ickens. ORDINANCE 52687-11 AMENDING CHAPTER 13, "OFFENSES-MISCELLANEOUS," SECTIONS 13 AND 14 OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE CONCERNING UNLAWFUL DISPOSAL OF WASTE MATERIALS AND UNLAWFUL ACCUMULATIONS OF TRASH AND WEEDS BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke ~ounty, Virginia, as follows: 1. That Chapter 13, "Offenses-Miscellaneous," Section 13-13. "Unlawful disposal of rubbish or other waste materials," ~f the Roanoke County Code be amended as follows: Sec. 13-13. Unlawful disposal of rubbish or other waste material (a) No person shall dump or dispose of or leave or cause to be thrown any rubbish, tin cans, trash, garbage or other wa to substance or material in or upon and along any street, r d, highway, park or alley in the county; nor shall any per on dispose of, dump or throw any rubbish, tin cans, trash, r- bage or any other waste material or substance upon ny naeant lots or property in the county which have not b en May 26, 1987 - __ -,r-- -- -- selected, approved and designated as a garbage or trash dis- posal area by the health department of the county. II 2. That Chapter 13, "Offenses-Miscellaneous," Sec ion 13-14. "Unlawful accumulations of trash and growth of weeds; pu lic nuisances and abatement thereof," of the Roanoke County Cod be amended as follows: Sec. 13-14. Unlawful accumulation of trash and growth of we ds; public nuisances and abatement thereof. (a> For the purposes of this section, the following words and phrases shall have the meanings respectively ascribed to hem by this subsection: (4) Parcel: Any real estate, or any interest therein, s tu- ate, lying and being in the county en which any in n areas zoned for residential, business, commercial, or in us- trial uses er ieat4tntienai aettvity is eendneted a en whseh nay daeartt reaidentsaiT eemmereiaiT irednatriai; er sa ts- tatseaa~ bni}ding er streetnre is ~eeated or in any subd vi- sion. 1987. (5) Subdivision: Any tract or parcel of land divided nto three f3} two (2) or more lots or parcels, eentai sag three-fenrths of an acre of ~aadT for the purpose, whe her immediate or future, of transfer of ownership or developm ntt as otherwise defined in the Roanoke Count Subdivision Or fin- ance. (c) Weeds growing between May first and 6eteber fsrs on and trash lying on any parcel shall constitute a public ui- sauce. It shall be unlawful to cause or maintain a pu lic nuisance with respect to any parcel. An owner shall abate any public nuisance with respect to this parcel. Between May fsfteenth and 3ene fifteenth and between P:egnst first and ep- teMber first of each year Every owner of real estate sit ate in the county shall cause to be cut therefrom all weeds and to remove therefrom all trash. Any owner who shall violate the provisions of this subsection shall be deemed guilty of a Class 4 misdemeanor. 2. The effective date of this amendment shall be Jun 1, On motion of Supervisor McGraw, seconded by Supervisor)) Nickens and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None ABSENT: None 2. Ordinance authorizin the Ac uisition of Easements for the Castle Rock Sewer Line: Mr. Mahoney stated) i ~...:~ I May 26, 1987 ----- - _. -- - -- ,, __- .his ordinance will authorize the acquisition of eight easements n order to successfully complete the Castle Rock Sewer Line. Supervisor Garrett moved to approve the second reading f the ordinance. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Nickens. ORDINANCE 52687-12 AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION OF EASEMENTS, CASTLE ROCK SEWER LINE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading concerning the acquisition of approximately eight (8> easements for the Castle Lock Sewer Line was held on May 12, 1987. A second reading on :his matter was held on May 26, 1987. 2. That these easements are for underground sewer .fines for the Castle Rock Project. 3. That the County Administrator is authorized to exe- ~ute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke ounty as are necessary to,accomplish the conveyance of said pro- erty, all of which shall be upon form approved by the County ttorney. On motion of Supervisor Garrett, seconded by Supervisor ickens and carried by the following recorded vote: YES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson ~YS: None 3SENT: None 3. Ordinance authorizin the Ac uisition of Easement ~r the Brambleton Avenue Hiahwav Protect Mr. Mahoney 'ported that this will authorize the acquisition of an easement ~ complete the Brambleton Avenue Highway Project. Supervisor Brittle moved to approve the second reading the ordinance. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Garrett. May 26, 1987 ------ ---- -ir _ -- __ ---- ORDINANCE 52687-13 AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION OF EASEMENT, BRAMBLETON AVENUE HIGHWAY PROJECT BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of 518.04 of the Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading concerning the acquisi- tion of one (1) easement for the Brambleton Avenue Highway Pro- ject was held on May 12, 1987. A second reading on this matter was held on May 26, 1987. 2. That this easement is for underground water lines for the Brambleton Avenue Highway Project. 3. That the County Administrator is authorized to exe- cute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County as are necessary to accomplish the conveyance of said pro- perty, all of which shall be upon form approved by the County Attorney. On motion of Supervisor Brittle, seconded by Supervisor Garrett and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None ABSENT: None IN RE: PUBLIC HEARINGS 587-1 PUBLIC HEARING TO HEAR CITIZEN COMMENT ON AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 12-28 OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE TO INCREASE THE ANNUAL LICENSE TAX ON MOTOR VEHICLES No citizens were present to speak on this issue. 587-3 PETITION OF J. B. GORIA REQUESTING REZONING FROM B-3 BUSINESS TO B-2 BUSINESS OF A TRACT CONTAINING 1.57 ACRES LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF ROUTE 419 WEST OP BERNARD DRIVE IN THE CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT APPROVED __ e . May 26, 1987 Supervisor Brittle asked that this petition be hear. prior to the others on the agenda, because he was very familiar with it and anticipated no opposition. The Planning Commissioc recommended approval. Mr. Goria was present to answer an} questions. Supervisor Brittle moved to approve the rezoning with proffered conditions. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Johnson. FINAL ORDER NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDERED that the aforementioned parcel of land, which is contained in the Roanoke County Tax Maps as Parcel 87.07-03-11 and recorded in Deed Book and legally described below, be rezoned from B-3 District to B-2 District. BEGINNING at a conc. hwy mon. on the south right-of-way line of Va. Route 419 at its intersection with the east right-of-way line of the property of Norfolk and Western Railway Co. (Now Norfolk Southern) thence leaving said BEGINNING point and with the south right-of-way line of Va. Route 419 S. 890 51' 40" 243.94' to an iron pin, thence leaving Route 419 N. 00 Og' 20" E 35.07' to an iron pin, thence S. 81° 02' 30" E. 91.72' to an iron pin corner to property of Golden Coral, thence with same S. 80 57' 30"W 225.0' to an iron pin corner to "Travelers Property", thence with same N. 810 02' 30" 232.58' to an iron pin corner in the right-of-way line of the N&W Railway property (now Norfolk Southern) thence with same N. 160 27' 00" W. 245.06' to the place of beginning and containing 1.57 acre and being tract 3 as shown on the division of property of Tanglewood Mall, Inc. of record in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia in Plat Book 9 Page 180, prepared by Buford T. Lumsden & Assoc. P.C. Certified land surveyors dated October 12, 1979. BE IT FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this order be ransmitted to the Secretary of the Planning Commission and that e be directed to reflect that change on the official zoning map f Roanoke County. May 26, 1987 ADOPTED on motion of Supervisor Brittle and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None PROFFER OF CONDITIONS 1. There will be no freestanding outdoor advertisinc signage. 2. Petitioner will provide fire hydrant near entrance tc property on service road. 3. Site plan to include a yield sign for existing traffic from site on frontage road at intersection with Route 419. 587-2 PETITION OF SPRINGWOOD ASSOCIATES TO AMEND CONDITIONS OF A 0.606 ACRE PARCEL TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF AN ADDITIONAL RETAIL CENTER ADJACENT TO 3513 BRAMBLETON AVENUE IN THE WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT APPROVED Assistant County Administrator Timothy Gubala announced this hearing was tabled on February 24, 1987 until the Board of .Zoning Appeals decided on an interpretation of whether head gasket or other engine head service and clutch repair were considered major mechanical work. The Board of Zoning Appeals did resolve the matter and did concur with those issues proposed by the petitioner. The Planning Commission voted to recommend denial of the petition. Michael Smeltzer, Attorney for the petitioner was present. He stated the purpose of the petition is to amend the site plan for the purpose of constructing another building for retail use. When the petition was originally heard, there was discussion of whether or not the petitioner was living up to the amended conditions of the original petition, and that was the reason for the delay. Since the Board of Zoning Appeals has Beard the issue, the site plan has been further proffered to ~. jj __. May 26, 1987 ----- _- - -_ __ __ -- ---~-- answer concerns of the planning staff and the board members, and ,they have also proffered out certain uses of the property. Supervisor Garrett asked Mr. Smeltzer if the petitioners had any idea of what utilization would be made of the building. Mr. Smeltzer responded that other than proffering out certain uses, they did not know yet. Supervisor Garrett asked if ~ fast food franchise was being considered. Mr. Smeltzer answered it was difficult to identify what a "fast food :ranchise" is. Supervisor Garrett asked Mr. Gubala what kind of impact on traffic and whether there was adequate parking for a fast food business. Mr. Gubala responded that there are specific requirements for parking for restaurants based on the size of the' building. Supervisor Brittle asked if the building would be open .space or a specific number of offices or stores. Mr. Smeltzer stated the building would be built as a shell, and finished as space is rented. Mr. Gubala stated that when the site plan review was done, they would check whether there was adequate parking facilities if the petitioner desired a restaurant. If the County 3enied approval of a restaurant, the issue would have to be heard ~y the Board of Zoning Appeals. Mr. Smeltzer offered to proffer e~'-*he use of the >roperty for a restaurant. County Attorney Paul Mahoney -esponded that they were not legally able to proffer additional conditions at this time. Speaking in opposition to the petition were Martha 'aery, 3516 Pinevale Road, whose property adjoins the petitioners; and Greg Edwards, 3536 Pinevale Road. Mr. Smeltzer responded that they felt they have made very effort to live up to the proffers,_and were aware that the oning Administrator for the County had been watching them May 26, 1987 closely. Supervisor Garrett noted that he has visited the site, and at that time, they saw no violation of any of the previous proffers. The Board of Zoning Appeals has solved the problem of whether there are major or minor repairs on the property. Supervisor Garrett moved to approve the petition with proffered conditions. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Brittle. Supervisor Nickens advised that even though the petitioner cannot proffer out using the property as a restaurant, he felt the petitioners would not utilize the property this way because of problems that could arise. Supervisor Johnson responded he felt that the staff would be checking to make sure that the petitioners handle the property correctly. Supervisor Johnson asked Mr. Gubala to investigate the (possibility of an exemption to the screening and buffering ordinance when the petitioner and the adjoining property owners.. agree that a fence is not the best screening of a property. FINAL ORDER NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDERED that the conditions of the aforementioned parcel of land, which is contained in the Roanoke County Tax Maps as Parcel 77.09-4-37 and recorded in Deed Book 1225, page 1136 and legally described below, be amended from B-2 Conditional District to B-2 Conditional District to permit the construction of a building for lease to retail businesses. BEGINNING at an iron pin located on the northerly side of Brambleton Avenue S. W. (U. S. Route 221), said point being corner to the property of Charlotte Heslep (Will Book 32, page 498);thence with the northerly side of Brambleton Avenue, S. 580 00' 00" W. 166.4 feet to an iron pin, corner of Lot 15 of D. B. and Ellis B. Ferguson Map; thence leaving Brambleton Avenue and with the line of Lot 15, N. 320 00' 00" W. 165 feet to an iron pin on the line of Lot 17; thence with the line of Lot 17, W. 58° 00' E. 8.32 feet to an iron pin corner to Lot >y; ~~ ;~. :v` May 26, 1987 W-2; thence with the line of Lot W-2 the following two courses and distances: S. 800 48' 00" E. 51.09 feet to an iron pin and N. 03° 37' 07" E. 41.4 feet to an iron pin; thence N. 580 00' 00" E. 98.45 ~~ feet to an iron pin corner to the Heslep property; thence with the Heslep property, S. 300 59' 00" E. 165.02 feet to an iron pin on the northerly side of Brambleton Avenue, THE PLACE OF BEGINNING; and CONTAINING 0.606 acres and being as more particularly shown on plat of survey made by Buford T. Lumdsden and Associates, P, C. Engineers-Surveyors dated August 29, 1985; and BEING the same property conveyed to Springwood Associates, a Virginia General Partnership by deed from Bane International Corporation, a Virginia Corporation, dated August 28, 1985, and recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, in Deed Book 1225, page 1136. BE IT FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this order be transmitted to the Secretary of the Planning Commission and that he be directed to reflect that change on the official zoning map of Roanoke County. ADOPTED on motion of Supervisor Garrett, and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson YS: None PROFFER OF CONDITIONS Petitioner will abide by the regulations within the B-2 istrict and is offering the following three new conditions: (1> to reduce the buffer zone on the western side of property to ten feet and plant a row of pine trees. (2) To amend the previous concept plan t~ allow for the truction of a retail building. (3> No dry cleaning will be conducted on the premises. These conditions are in addition to six conditions that e offered during the previous rezoning. These proffers are as lows: May 26, 1987 (1) The facility will not be used by the petitioner fog major mechanical work or for automobile body work. (2) There will be no outside storage of vehicles. (3) The facility will not be used to conduct the sale of new or used automobiles. (4) The petitioner will install and maintain suck screening as recommended by the Roanoke County Zoninc_ Administrator. (5) The petitioner will install outside lighting in accordance with the recommendations and approval of the Roanoke County Administrator. (6) The petitioner agrees to comply with such sound emission regulations as may be promulgated by the Roanoke County Planning Staff. Additionally, the petitioner agrees to take such action as necessary in order to reduce the noise level to no more than the level of business now existing in the immediate vicinity of the property sought to be zoned. ADDITIONAL PROFFER OF CONDITIONS The Petitioner now desires to have the conditions previously imposed be amended as follows: a. To amend the Site Plan previously filed substituting therefore a new Site Plan made by Balzer & Associates, dated May 22, 1987. b. The following uses will not be conducted on the property: 1) No dry cleaning will be conducted on said property. 2) Hotels 3> Motels 4) Theaters 5) Assembly halls 6) New Car dealerships V -.. .~: s ~--- May 26, 1987 Except as amended herein, the original Petition shall remain unchanged. II587-4 PETITION OF JOSEPH AND SANDRA QUESENBERRY REQUESTING REZONING FROM ~~ B-1 BUSINESS TO B-2 BUSINESS OF A TRACT CONTAINING 0.819 ACRE AND LOCATED AT 4347 OLD CAVE SPRING ROAD IN THE WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT. APPROVED Mr. Gubala reported that this hearing came before the Planning Commissioner earlier this month. The building exists now, but the petitioners desire to change the use. The Planning Commission voted denial by a 3 to 0 vote with two members absent. Since then, the petitioners have presented additional proffers. Roy Robrecht, attorney for the petitioners was present to answer any questions. He stated that when the Quesenberrys bought the property there was a house on it zoned B-1. The petitioners presented their plans for sale of swimming pools to Roanoke County and thought it could be done under the present zoning. The County approved the plans. After he was completed and moved in, the County then informed him that in order to sell accessories he would have to rezone the property for retail sales. Mr. Robrecht presented to the Board a list of similar types of businesses in the area. Paul Higginbotham, 4909 Cave Spring Lane was present to speak in opposition to the rezoning. He advised that he was told by the Mr. Quesenberry that there would only be an office on the property, but there is now chemicals, chlorine, and sporadic .acid stored there. He presented a letter an~7 notation from other residents in the area opposed to the rezoning. He was also concerned with the storage trailer at the rear of the building, and trucks that were stored there. He has received a letter from a realtor that stated there is. a possibility that residential property values in the area could depreciate. ~'~ '~ ~~ May 26, 1987 ~~..._ Supervisor Johnson pointed out that the petitioner has proffered that he will remove the storage trailer. Supervisor McGraw noted that the property could in fact appreciate as Ilcommercial property rather than residential. Supervisor Garrett moved to approve the petition with the proffered conditions. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Brittle. FINAL ORDER NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDERED that the aforementioned parcel of land, which is contained in the Roanoke County Tax Maps as Parcel 76.20-1-13 and recorded in Deed Book 989, page 545 and legally described below, be rezoned from B-1 Business District to B-2 Business District. BEGINNING at Corner #1, said point being located on the northerly right-of-way of Virginia Secondary Route 1663 (formerly U. S. Route 221), said point also being the southwesterly corner of the Allen R. Moran property, said point being located S. 840 17' S0" W. 62.67 feet from an existing highway monument; thence leaving the Moran property and with Virginia Secondary Route 1663, S. 840 17' 50" W. 97.20 feet to an existing highway monument, being Corner 42; thence leaving Virginia Secondary Route 1663 and with the northerly right-of-way of Old Cave Spring Road (formerly Old Virginia Route 119) for the following 2 courses, N. 410 45' 30" W. 9.77 feet to an existing highway monument being Corner ~3; thence with a curve to the left which said curve is defined by a delta angle of 16° 50' 40", said curve is defined by a delta angle of 160 50' 40", a radius of 517.46, an arc of 152.13,a chord of 151.60 and bearing N. 500 10' S0" W. to Corner $4, an existing iron pin; said point being the southeasterly property corner of Honey Tree Child Care Center (Deed Book 1223, Page 410); thence leaving Old Cave Spring Road and with the easterly boundary line of Honey Tree Child Care Center, N 90 07' 00" W. 83.93 feet to Corner #4A, thence leaving the Honey Tree Child Care Center property and with a rezoning line through the property of Joseph A. Quesenberry and Sandra C. Quesenberry, N 840 17' 50" E, 222.03 feet to Corner 6A, said point located on the westerly boundary line of the Allen R. Moran property; thence running with the ~I May 26, 1987 westerly boundary line of the Moran Property, S. 3° 27' 00" E, 200.00 feet to Corner #1, the actual place of BEGINNING, and containing 0.819 acres, as more particularly shown on a plat prepared by Buford T. Lumdsden & Associates, P. C., Engineers-Surveyors, dated April 8, 1987. BE IT FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this order by transmitted to the Secretary of the Planning Commission and that he be directed to reflect that change on the official zoning map of Roanoke County. ADOPTED on motion of Supervisor Garrett and upon the, following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None PROFFER OF CONDITIONS 1. Property to be limited to swimming pool service and supplies and retail sales. 2. Storage trailer at the rear of the building will be screened from view by the way of wooden fencing on three sides. 3. Parking of company vehicles will be at the rear of the property. ~~ 4. No outside storage or sales of swimming pool services and supply equipment be permitted. ADDITIONAL PROFFER OF CONDITIONS 1. Removal of storage trailer. 2. Use of premises only for the purpose of selling swimming pools (showroom) and related accessories. IN RE: CITIZENS COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS None IN RE: ADJOURNMENT At 9:37 p.m., Chairman Johnson adjourned the meeting. Bob L. Johnson, Chairman A-62387-7.a ITEM NUMBER ~` ~-' AT A REGULAR MEELDNATOTHEHROANOKE COUNTYEADMINISTRATIONNCENTER COUNTY, VIRGINIA H MEETING DATE: June 23, 1987 SUBJECT: Acceptance of Water and Sewer Lines serving C.M. Davis ~- Apartments COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Investment The developer of C.M. Davis Apartments, Enterprises, LTD, has requested that Roanoke County accept the deed conveying the water and sewer lines serving the subdivision along with all necessary easements. The water and sewer lines are installed as shown on engineering plans prepared by Alpha Land Surveyors entitled site plan for C.M.Davis, Inc. dated June 30, 1984, which are on file in the Public Facilities Department. The water and sewn vedlby construction meets the specifications and the plans app the County. FISCAL IMPACT: ~~ The values of the and $6,500, respectively, water and sewer construction are $5,000 RECOMMENDATION: The staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors accept the water and sewer factsitand authorizeethebCounty Administrator all necessary Basemen , to execute a Deed for the transfer of these facilities. 1 SUBMITTED BY: ~~ Phillip T. Henry P. E. Director of Engineering APPROVED: ~j ~. ~~a~~ f~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ---------------------- ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs Approved ( ~ Motion by. HCN/AHB to approve Brittle X Denied ( ) Garrett X Received ( ) Johnson X Referred McGraw X to Nickens X cc: File Clifford Craig Phillip Henry John Hubbard 2 ~ s i ~O"° E pPt' ~ ~~ :2 Ac ~~ ~ ~ •~ / / 1.41AC °, 3 A-62387-7.b _ ITEM NUMBER ~ -`~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: June 23, 1987 SUBJECT: Acceptance of water and sewer facilities serving Woodbridge Subdivision, Section 8 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~Q C~L`rrvw SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The developer of Section 8, Woodbridge Subdivision, Westclub Corporation, has requested that Roanoke County accept the deed conveying the water and sewer lines serving the subdivision along with all necessary easements. The water and sewer lines are installed as shown on engineering plans prepared by T. P. Parker & Sons, Engineers & Surveyors entitled, Section 8, Woodbridge Subdivision dated December 3, 1984, which are on file in the Public Facilities Department. The water and sewer line construction meets the specifications and the plans approved by the County. FISCAL IMPACT: ~,U The value of the water and sewer construction are $20,150.00 and $25,745.00 respectively. RECOMMENDATION: The staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors accept the water and sewer facilities serving the subdivision along with all necessary easements, and authorize the County Administrator to execute a Deed for the transfer of these facilities. 1 ~~ .~ ~~ SUBMITTED BY: f ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~%-~~ Phillip ZT. Henry ,,j E. Director of Engineering APPROVED: Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ----------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ~ Motion by: HCN/AHB No Yes Abs Denied ( ) to approve Brittle X Received ( ) Garrett X Referred Johnson X to McGraw X Nickens X cc: File Clifford Craig Phillip Henry John Hubbard 2 ~ .- ~,, ~. _. NORTH h w.s~ b9si e , ----' 6" Water Line ~ 0 5 ~ 4 ~ o~ '~ 2 • As: - -- -Sewer Line ' 17 =~1' ~ • ~~~ WOOD DG ,39 a ~.s .1~ ~~•;~°s, m ~a I~ °a 13 h~ 0 ~ a~ ~~2 ~° d ~a.ee a2; ~ f ° ~ 19 ~' 4 66 ~ • . h 12 ~~ o, 17 6e.21 ,6 ~0 ~~ ~ ~. a''0~ '~?J 9" 10 ,8116''°/ ~ 5 ~. ~ 9 A Ci `Z aa,3 ea,4 ~ 21 a A~y O . 'J I ~ ° ,°a ~ ~° • ~9ti1 J 'y 95`~ 8a2 ~ 23 ~22 ~W,, 6`~,. ~°ry. 9 ,~a e,'. ,,.215 0~ / 24 0 ~ ~ ,~ o • a °° / N 25 0 . ~ a ea d qZ 8 •,3~ '~ ~ -p i~g ~°° o~ .,g 127 ag. o a • ..- a Qn 9 ~° 934 a 1 ~ ~ 27 ;, 26 a aJ361° as Pas a 7 '~ 6 ~ti~9~ cps 13 p\~°° ~~ ~~°%/ ,a~ / ~• o ., ~~ ae 6 ~ N 5 3~ ee6 „~1° 4 •3 _ 9482 i B D' °qa a9~~ ~ 5~ \~g~ ~a°3 .¢ ~ '~ ~,~ ~ 3 8 8s , ; 25 6 ~~ ~~~~ p \ e6 s 2 ~ ~, ~ 1 ° 2 e9 8 c 24 i0 `°y ~ 312 a\ ~/~ mm 5~o Asses! of ~ ~ • / `~ 9s 1O : 2 2 23 3~z as -~i~~~' p'~ "a~l l ~J ~~s/~~ ~ ,, ~ m 2 2 ~ - // > 21 as 6a '~ 2~ "•~aa p ~J~ sr~ g66 ~ ° - ~ ° 20 ° ~6a - 28 0 4 2 `a5 'w ii~~ 5 • a 19° ~~~ ~ 1° ea ea 3 ~i9 ~ . 5 ~ ~oy1/ ~~ 110 ~ ~~ 7 s I O ° ' ~" ~ 30 ~ Zs~3 9°~ ~° q.4 • ~J ti° ~,. \ \ 6 ~\~, 15 ~ ° ea 31 ~ 0 6 / ~ 3A27 \ Assess ~ 1 32 ~ 7 se 363 D~3 'sN~ 9~ ``/~\Z5 ~o a~ ~n Clly ` 33 B, '' ~9~. 9 ,,, ~ mem i . ° 4 15 34;~ ~ /0 8a a~ o . '° • a ~' ~' S6~~ as ~~ $ / ° \ ° / ~ `` 98 - 38 ;39 = ' l 1agT ~ - e ~'~°~° ' 45 °~,~ j $ ~\ j 36 `~\~ ~ a ~ s~ ~ 5552y33 47 so ~p9 69 ~ 2 ~° o ~ ^~ ` 9° 50 4 ~~~ 13 ~OA12' ' =5' ~ ~ 15 51 • i 5 ~ `t S -' , ~ ~, rog 52 $ ' • 6 ~ Assessed !n Cily i ' 153 s`~ `~ B 9° ~/ So%m $q~ o •~~ ~ ~° 14 /- 2 96 6 i I A DEPARTMENT OF Z ~ PUBLIC FACILITIES WATERISEWER ACCEPTANCE 3 A-62387-7 ITEM NUMBER - ~"`~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: June 23, 1987 SUBJECT: Confirmation of Committee Appointments COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The following nominations have been made and must now be confirmed by the Board of Supervisors. All nominees have agreed to serve. Fifth Planning District Commission Bob L. Johnson was nominated by Supervisor Nickens to serve another term, as an elected representative. His term will expire June 30, 1990. Planning Commission Michael J. Gordon has been nominated by Supervisor Garrett to serve the unexpired term of Mr. Lee Eddy, representing the Windsor Hills Magisterial District. His term will expire December 31, 1988. Recreation Commission Mr. William M. Skelton, Jr. has been nominated by Supervisor Garrett to serve a three-year term representing the Windsor Hills Magisterial District. His term will expire on June 30, 1990. Mr. Michael J. Lazzuri has been nominated by Supervisor Brittle to serve another three-year term as an at-large representative. His term will expire June 30, 1990. Virginia Western Community College Board Mr. Stephen A. Musselwhite has been nominated by Supervisor Nickens to serve another four-year term. His term will expire June 30, 1991. ~~ ~ *::` SUBMITTED BY: Mary H. Allen Deputy Clerk APPROVED BY: r Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved (X) Motion by: Nickens/Brittle to approve No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Brittle X Received ( ) Garrett X Referred Johnson X To McGraw X Nickens X cc: Fifth Planning District File Recreation Commission File Planning Commission File Virginia Western File File ," .• ITEM NUMBER ~ "` ~' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: June 23, 1987 SUBJECT: Acceptance of Hollyberry Road COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~u.cc~x,.ri ;,~~:,,~~~ SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Developer of Higginbotham Farms Subdivision requests that the Board of Supervisors approve a resolution to the Virginia Department of Transportation requesting that they accept 0.25 miles of Hollyberry Road. The staff has inspected this road along with representatives of the Virginia Department of Transportation and find this road is acceptable. FISCAL IMPACT: ~L- No County funds required. RECOMMENDATION: The staff recommends that the Board approve a resolution to the VDOT requesting that they accept Hollybery Road into the Secondary Road System. SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED: ~~~~ , r A~ ~~~ d r, Phillip T. Henry Elmer C. Hodge Director of Engineering County Administrator ------------------------------------------------------------------ ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred To Brittle Garrett Johnson McGraw Nickens 1 ..~_~.. AT THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROAN ~ ~¢^ COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATIONKE CENTER ON TUESDAY, JUNE 9, 1987 RESOLUTION REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF HOLLYBERRY ROAD INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That this matter came this date to be heard upon the proceedings herein, and upon the application for Hollyberry Road to be accepted and made a part of the Secondary System of State Highways under Section 33.1-229 of the Virginia State Code. 2• That it appears to the Board that drainage easements and a fifty (50> foot right-of-way for said road has heretofore deed dedicated by virtue of a certain map known as Higginbotham Farms Subdivision which map was recorded in Plat Book 9, Pages 103 and 314, of the records of the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, on December 8, 1977 and January 31, 1985 and that by reason of the recordation of said map no report from a Board of Viewers, nor consent or donation of right-of-way from the abutting property owners is necessary. The Board hereby guarantees said right-of-way for drainage. 3. That said road known as Hollyberry Road and which is shown on a certain sketch accompanying this Resolution, be, and the same are hereby established as public roads to become part of the State Secondary System of Highways in Roanoke County, only from and after notification of official acceptance of said streets or highway by the Virginia Department of Transportation. 2 AT THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JUNE 9, 1987 RESOLUTION 62387-7.d REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF HOLLYBERRY ROAD INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as tollows: 1. That this matter came this date to be heard upon the proceedings herein, and upon the application for Hollyberry Roa d to be accepted an3 made a part of the Secondary System of State Highways under Section 33.1-229 of the Virginia State Code. 2. That it appears to the Board that drainage easements and a fifty (50) foot right-of-way for said road has heretofore deed dedicated by virtue of a certain map known as Higginbotham Farms Subdivision which map was recorded in Plat Book 9, Pages 103 and 314, of the records of the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, on December 8, 1977 and January 31, 1985 and that by reason of the recordation of said map no report from a Board of Viewers, nor consent or donation of right-of-way from the abutting property owners is necessary. The Board hereby guarantees said right-of-way for drainage. 3. That said road known as Hollyberry Road and which is shown on a certain sketch accompanying this Resolution, be, and the same are hereby established as public roads to become part of the State Secondary System of Highways in Roanoke County, only from and after notification of official acceptance of said streets or highway by the Virginia Department of Transportation. On motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by Supervisor Brittle, and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, NcGraw, Nickens NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Johnson A COPY - TESTE: i~'2 ~~ Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk 6/25/87 cc: File John Peters, Assistant Director of Engineering Phillip Henry, Director of Engineering Arnold Covey, Department Review Coordinator A-62387-7.e ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETINT H SADMINISTRAT ON RCENTER COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD A E T ROANORE COUNTY MEETING DATE: June 23, 1987 SUBJECT: Request to amend Minutes of December 16, 1986 and Final Order concerning JELCO Construction COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~~ ~~}) ,~~ ~-F.~~'"^,~v~-~~ ~'~.~ ''JJ u~ ~~"~ ~ V SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: On December 16, 1986, JELCO Construction Company requested to rezone the front portion of their property from M-1, Industrial with conditions to B-2, Business with conditions, and to amend the existing conditions on the rear portion of their property. Mr. Rudy Cox, the petitioner asked that the request to ameand the existing conditions be continued The Boa ~d4ofdSupervisors Board consider the rezoning only. approved the rezoning request. The request to a 27 d1987 conditions of the rear portion was continuedMon Coxuwithdrew his and February 24, 1987. At that time, request completely. The minutes of December 16, 1987 and the final order roffereof reflect the action that took place. However, the p conditions concerning the rear portion of the property was incorrectly included. In order to ensure th t iteislnecessarydthat theyrberamendedlto this petition is correc , ertain to the rezoning. This delete the proffers that do not p Attorney, and he agrees action has been discussed with the County that this action is necessary. 1.~''`,` RECOMMENDATION• It is recommended that pages 252, 253, and 254 in Book 36 of the Minutes of the Board of Supervisors be amended to delete the proffer of conditions not approved by the Board on December 16, 1986, that the final order also be amended to delete those proffers, and that t he Board approve the amend ed minutes and final order concerning JELCO Construction, Inc. SUBMITTED BY: xr. Mary H. A len Deputy Clerk APPROVED BY: Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ----------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved (X) Motion by: Nickens/Brittle to No Y~s Abs Denied ( ) approve Brittle Received Referred To Garrett X Johnson McGraw X Nickens X X cc: File Rob Stalzer Tim Gubala ~„J - tip .., +~~/ M E M O R A N D U M TO: Mary Allen THRU: Rob Stalzer ~,S FROM: Liz Bradley ~~ DATE: June 10, 1987 SUBJECT: Final Order of JELCO Construction Co., Inc. In December of 1986, the Board of Supervisors approved a request from JELCO Construction Co., Inc. to rezone the front portion of a 1.65 acre tract, recorded as tax map # 77.17-5-22, from M-1, Industrial to B-2, Business. At the same time, the Board denied a request from JELCO Construction Co., Inc. to amend the conditions on the rear portion of the property. Conditions were proffered on each request. They were, however, combined and attached to the final order, indicating that all of the conditions applied to the request which was approved. In order to clarify the proffered conditions, will you please delete conditions 1 through 7 in the official records. Condition 8, "Single entrance from Route 221" and condition 9, "Earthern berms and decorative plantings shall screen ..." apply to the rezoning request which was approved. If I can be of further assistance, please let me know. ajb December 16, 1986 (208) the off- site facilities fee as'established for the size fire service requested. 2. This ordinance shall be effective December 17, 1! 0: a A N 186. i motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor McGraw id upon the following recorded vote: YES: Supervisors McGraw, Nickens, Garrett, Johnson, and Brittle AYS: None N RE: PUBLIC HEARINGS Petition of Jelco Construction Company, Inc., to .286-1 from M-1, rezone the front portion of the property Industrial with conditions, to B-2, Business with conditions, and to amend the exislocatednnorthnandn the rear portion of the property east of Mick or Mack on Route 221 in the Cave Spring Magisterial District. (HELD OVER FROM NOVEMBER 25, 1986). Chairman Brittle announced that the per.lr.l~~lC~ ~.~~ continued his request regarding the existing conditions on the rear portion of the property for 30 to 45 days. This public hearing is only to rezone the front portion of the property. Mr. Rudy Cox, petitioner, was present to request that the Board favorably consider this rezoning request. Supervisor Johnson reported to Mr. Cox that the slope on that property should not be disturbed. Ms. Alva Anderson, 4915 Colonial Avenue, SW, Roanoke, Virginia, an adjoining property owner, was present in opposition to the rezoning request. She reported that at the last Board meeting, Mr. Cox was directed to meet with Mr. Anderson and Mr. Craighead concerning the plans for this property, and to date he has not. 2 53 December 16, 1986 ---_... (~ Mr. Nelson Craighead, also present in opposition, reported to the Board that his position on this matter has not changed, and he is still opposed to the rezoning. Supervisor Nickens moved to rezone the front portion of this property to B-2 only, the petitioner having withdrawn his request to amend existing conditions on the rear portion of the property. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Brittle. FINAL ORDER NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDERED that the aforementioned) parcel of land, which is contained in the Roanoke County Tax Maps as Parcel 77.17-5-22 and legally described below be rezoned from M-1, Industrial with conditions, to B-2, Business with conditions. BEGINNING at an iron pin on the easterly right-of-way of U. S. 221 and northerly corner to August Realty Corp. property (D.B. 1188, Page 1414), thence along said right-of-way N. 40° 59' 52" E., 325.22 feet to an iron pin corner to James T. Anderson property (D.B. 767, Page 404); thence leaving said right-of-way and with Anderson property S. 04° 05' S4" W., 300.00 feet to a point; thence leaving Anderson property and with new rezoning line N. 85° 40' 20" W., 106.07' to a point on line with August Realty property; thence with August Realty property N. 04° 19' 40" E „ ?9.~4 feet to an iron pin; thence with same N 85° 40' 20" W., 89.35 feet to the beginning and containing 0.680 acres and being the northerly portion of property (1.65 acre) as shown on survey map by T. P. Parker & Son, dated December 28, 1978. (D.B. 1217, Page 1332). BE IT FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this order be transmitted to the Secretary of the Planning Commission and that he be directed to reflect that change on the official zoning map of Roanoke County. PROFFER OF CONDITIONS The petitioners hereby voluntarily proffer to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, the following conditions to the zoning request referenced above: }: Maintain a 3A feat bnffer area a}ang the north property benndarg which ad3eins the R-} Hiatriet- ~- Preseree and maintain existing: natnra} growth and topography within 3A feet bnffer area- 3- ~e the farthest practice} extent= conserve signifiesnt natnra} eentenrs of the }and: 2 5 4 L- ~ ~ ~ ~ December 16, 1986 -~ --- T_ _ _ - -- 4- A~eng the rear property benndaryT pant and Maintain one rerr of white pine trees - panted net Mere than ~9 feet en center and having a minimnM height of five feet at p~anting- 5: Beerease the permitted length E£r_entage} of the Mini-rrarehonse beiid4ng frets 359 b-i~: to 3~9 b-P: Nhiie increasing its depth from ~9 b-F'- to 39 i~-g- aiierring an tnerease in ieaseabie space EfreM ~=999 S.i~: to 97699 S-F:} rrh#ie at the ~I same tune decreasing essnai impact: 6: the mini-rrareheesse faetiity Miii be of Masonry eenstrnetien with brick er textured Masonry en exposed tnet screened} sides a~~erring for some ~atitnde in arehiteetnra~ design.- the reef Miii slope to the west fferrrard terrard Mick-er-Maek}; 4- instead of nniferM i91 x X91 staiisfbays with garage deersT r-hieh have a~MOSt strictly a eemn-ereiai appeal; we desire to offer a More aide range of rental snit sized to meet i the deMands of the pnb~ie- Ferrer vehiea~ar and a few pedestrie} 'deers apse serve to break np the monotony of what rren~d nerr be 35 garage doers.- 8. Single entrance from Route 221. 9. Earthen berms and decorative plantings shall screen parking lot pavement in the area to be rezoned to B-2. 1286-2 Petition of Lynn Brae Farms, Inc., to rezone a 14.15 acre tract from R-3, Residential and M-1, Industrial, to B-2 Business to construct a commercial office park paralleling Starkey Road Extension in the Cave Spring Magisterial District. Ms. Maryellen F. Goodlatte was present on behalf of the petitioner requesting this rezoning. Ms. Goodlatte informed the Board that at first there was some question about water to serve the office park but that has been worked out with the Engineering Department. AMENllEll JUNE ,23, 1987 -6y~. VIRGINIA: Page 1 of 2 BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY ~Z ~lp "'/ A 1.65 acre parcel of land, ) generally located on the east side of ) Brambleton Avenue approximately 0.4 miles ) south of its intersection with Rout 419 ~ within the C~vp ~cnring ) FINAL ORDER -Magisterial District, and ) recorded as parcel ~ 77.17_5_x? ) in the Roanoke County Tax Records.) v7 ~ TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY: N- o r WHEREAS, your Petitioner __ JELCO Construction ~ 6. , Inc. o ~ did petition the Board of County Supervisors to rezone the above- o~ _. " ~ referenced parcel of land from M-1, Industrial - - - 0 F-- ~~ District to B-2, Business.. .District for the _ purpose W o f constructing an office-}fiuilding and to amend the conditions on the rear: ort~ion:ofi ",_ :. ;.. _ ,r, ._ ,. parce o a ow mi m -ware ouse s orage- ac> > y_ _ - ~ - ~- ~ WHEREAS,- after due- legal-- notice, -. the Planning- Commission =did :-hold a a public hearing of the petition-on Oct. 7, - ,. 19 86 , at which time, all parties in interest were given an opportunity to be heard; and WHEREAS; after full consideration;,'~~theBoard of -County Supervisors determined that the--rezoning`1~ ~of-the°front portion only" be approved. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDEREDi~.that the'~aforementioried"parcel 'of land, which 'is:;.contained in . the~.Roanoke County.--Tax~:.Maps_.as,: Parcel :-~ ° ~~-_. • ~~ ~ - <~ __ _ _ and 'recorded in Deed Boo'~C -: - and, legally described ~.- _. --.. __. ~_ ~°e- r _ .~ ~: ~~~ ~ below, a-zone ~ from - - M"1 District to B-2 District. JELCO 1.65 ACRE REZONING IN RE: ) 1.65 Acres located on the East) side of Brambleton Avenue, ) North of its Intersection with Route 1663 _.~..I /~.Z ~~ v_~~''a AMENDED JUNE 23, 1987 TO DELETE PROFFERS THAT DO NOT APPLY TO REZONED PROPERTY. PROFFER OF CONDITIONS The petitioners hereby voluntarily proffVirt~niae the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, g ~ following conditions to the zoning request referenced above: Maintain a 30 foot buffer area along the north / property boundary which adjoins the R-1 District. 2. Pr serve and maintain existing, natural gr and topography within 30 foot buffer area. 3. To the urthest practical extent, conse e sigriific nt natural contours of the la d. ant and 4. Along the ar property boundary, P lanted not more than maintain one row of white pine tr s - p 10 feet on ce er and having a m'nimum height of five feet at planting. of the 5. Decrease the permi ted leng (frontage mini-warehouse buil 'ng fr 350. L.F. to 320 L.F. while increasing its ep from 20 L.F. to 30 L.F. allowing an cincrease ~~aSeFb)ewhpleeat the same (from 7,000 F. to 9, time decreasing visu im ct. 6. The mini-warehous facility 'll be of masonry construction wit brick or to ured masonry on exposed (no screened) sides allowing for some latitude in architectural d ign. rward toward The roof wi -slope to the west Mick-or-Ma ). 7. Instead of uniform 10' X 20' stalls/ba with garag doors,. which have almost strictly a co mercial appeal, we desire to offer a wi range-of -rental unit sizes to meet the d mands__o€-!-the public. Fewer vehicular and few ---- -~~_t7rs also serve to break up the at would now be 35 garage doors. --mono .~. 8. Single entrance from Route 221. - 9. Earthen berms and decorative plantings shall screen parking lot pavement in the area to be rezoned to B-2. Page 2 of 2 ~~. /.2 ~~-~ Legal Description of Property: BE IT FURTHER .ORDERED that a copy of this order be trarismitt~ed to the Secretary of the Planning:. Commission and that he be direct-ed===to - .,._. reflect=-that change on the official= zoning map°of Roanoke=:County. ~~' - _. , .. ADOPTED;. on ,motion_.of Supervisor°`"~v~kPr,~G ~ o~o~~-V' rezan~-~~ front ____; portion of the property, seconded by Supervisor Brittle and upon the following recorded vote:`. AYES: McGraw,.--.~Tickens, Johnson, Garrett, and Brittle NAYS: None p,BSENT: None x~J :~1I. _:= e. Count .Boa ~ SuP~ _ Y~:.:_: Deputy.. - . , _ Cle r~___,. _W._ __. ~.28'~ -/ JELCO 0.68 ACRE PROPOSED B-2 REZONING ON ROUTE 221 ~''~~ '~~ BEGINNING AT AN IRON PIN ON THE EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF U.S. 221 AND NORTHERLY CORNER TO AUGUST REALTY CORP. PROPERTY (D.B. 1188 PG. 1414), THENCE ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY N 40°59'52"E, 325,22' TO AN IRON PIN CORNER TO JAMES. T. ANDERSON PROPERTY (D.B. 767 PG. 404), THENCE LEAVING SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY AND WITH ANDERSON PROPERY 'S 04°05'54"W, 300.00' TO A POINT: THENCE LEAVING ANDERSON PROPERTY AND WITH NEW REZONING LINE N 85°40'20" W, 106.07' TO A POINT ON LINE WITH AUGUST REALTY PROPERTY,.. THENCE WITH AUGUST REALTY PROPERTY N 04°19'40" E, 39.14' TO AN IRON PIN, THENCE WITH SAME N 85°40'20" W, 89.35'TO THE BEGINNING AND CONTAINING 0.680 ACRES AND BEING THE NORTHERLY PORTION OF PROPERTY (1.65 ACRE) AS SHOWN ON SURVEY MAP BY T.P. PARKER & SON, DATED DECEMBER 28, 1978, (D.B. 1217 PG. 1332). • y a A-62387-7.f ITEM NUMBER ~•~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: April 14, 1987 SUBJECT: Request for a Raffle Permit from Catawba Little League COUNT(Y~ ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: U VC- ~'~'~1iVweiti'~-~ '? ~~~r ~~ SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Catawba Little League, Inc.has requested a Raffle Permit. This application has been reviewed by the Commissioner of Revenue and he recommends that it be approved. The organization has paid the $25.00 fee RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that this application for a Raffle Permit be approved. SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: ~_ Mary H. Allen Deputy Clerk ~w '1. ~, ~Imer C. Hodge County Administrator ----------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ~ Motion by: Nickens/Brittle approve No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Brittle Received ( ) _.~ Referred Garrett X To Johnson _~ McGraw _~ Nickens X cc: File Bingo & Raffle Permits ~ ftOANO~ ~'~L*ANp~f~c ~.. ~~ ti ~ O « i G7 ~ ~ ~ 2 ~ ? COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA a` a 1 38 '1838 COMMISSIONER OF THE REVENUE APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO CONDUCT RAFFLES OR BINGO ~'... '`~ Application is hereby made for a bingo game or raffle permit. This application is made subject to all County and State laws, ordinances, rules, and regulations now ire d cto by the undebe enacted hereafter and which are hereby ag signed applicant and which shall be deemed a condition under which this permit is issued. All applicants should exercise extreme care to ensure the ac times cy of their responses to the following questions. Bingo g and raffles are strictly regulated by Title 18.2-340.1 et. se . of the criminal statutes oketCountrgCode.CThesealaws a thorize 4-86 et. sew. of the Roano Y the County Board of Supervibin o or oraffleapermitnabThe1Boardlhas tion prior to granting a g lication to grant or deny the sixty days from the filing of susaend, or revoke the permit of any permit. The Board may deny, P organization found not to be in strict compliance with county and state law. Any person violating county or state regulations concer erson hwho permits shall be guilty of a Class 1 misdemeanor. Any p uses any part of the gross receipts from bingo or raffles for any purpose other than the lswfor whichlthe~organization is specific or educational purpose cally organized, except for reasonable operating expenses, shal be guilty of a Class 6 felony. THIS APPLICATION IS FOR: (check one) RAFFLE PERMIT / BINGO GAMES L , Name of Organization Street Address Mailing Address • ~• +a0 ~'` City, State, zip Code .~A~ u"~' ~u • y~J 3 /l softball - Purpose and Type of Organization I~a~f~~a`'` rvL--1 ~~ oY~riLli CQ y rJ ~' ~C~ ~/ /~'! When was the organization founded? ~ 9~J 1 _~- ~~ ~,, ... lace. G~~,~-Vd/_ L~ ~-ra~vy Roanoke County meeting p Has organization been in exiNtOence in Roanoke County for two con- tinuous years? YES~_ Is the organization non-profit? YES X NO Indicate Federal Identification Number # Attach copy of IRS Tax Exemption letter. Officers of the Organization: President : R • L • Kaw ~~~'~ Address : ~~~~ Q ~~~~ C~ f secretary : L F /~~ l 'd °`~'~~" Address : .~/~J 6~av~hu~~ C~''' Vice-President ~~ /~ w~ ~~~~•~Ow Address: ~1S1 3 .Lr~id~ ~ ~~~°'~' .~a-fort yu , ~--Y/S3 Treasurer: S A /err' Address: 787 -ski ~ '~r' .~a ~~+'"- lea . ~/~:~ Member authorized to be responsible for. Raffle or Bingo opera- tions: Name ~ L loo`-"~~ ~~ °`~L Home Address Phone 3 ~d -3J `I9 Bus . Phone /337' ~"av o A COMPLETE LIST O HED WITHMTHIS APPLICATIONS OF CURRENT MEMBER- SHIP MUST BE FURNIS Specific location where Raffle or Bingo Game is to be conducted. Time of Drawing 3 ~ ~ ~~ r'''`'~ RAFFLES: Date of Drawing 7 '" y ~Z ~~ BINGO: Days of Week & Hours of Activity: Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday From To From To From To From _ To From To From To From To 2 ~.,,~.. State specifically how the proceeds from the Bingo/Raffle will be used. List in detail thetedeamounts ifanecessaryntended use of the proceeds. Use estima //~~ ~ f ra ~e e~" ~ D / /" r ~aSe 6~~/s~~d~.-~l, ~' .....yn'.r.~ ~...I BINGO: Complete the following: Legal owner(s) of the building where BINGO is to be conducted: Name: Address: County State Zip Is the building owned by a 501-C non-profit organization? Seating capacity for each location: Parking spaces for each location: ALL RAFFLE AND BINGO APPLICANTS MUST ANSWER QUESTIONS 1 - 19 1. Gross receipts from all sources related to the operation of Bingo games or Instant-Bingo by calendar quarter for prior calen- dar year period. BINGO INSTANT BINGO lst Quarter 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter 1st Quarter 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter Total ""'~ ~ Total -- ~ '~ 2. Does your organization understand that it is a violation of law to enter into a contract with any person or firm, associa- tion, organization, partnership, or corporation of any classifica- tion whatsoever, for the purpose of organizing, managing, or con- ducting Bingo Games or Raffles? ~/Q.S 3. Does your organization understand that it must maintain and file complete records of receipts and disbursements pertaining to Bingo games and Raffles, and that such records are subject to audit by the Commissioner of the Revenue? yQ J 4. Does your organization understand that the Commissioner of the Revenue or his designee has the right to go upon the premises on which any organization is conducting a Bingo game or raffle, to perform unannounced audits, and to secure for audit all re- cords required to be maintained for Bingo games or raffles? vQ~ 3 ~~~F~.~ 5. Does your organization understand that a Financial Report must be filed with the Commissioner of the Revenue on or before the first day of November of each calendar year for which a per- mit has been issued? VQ ~ 6. Does your organization understand that if gross receipts ex- ceed fifty thousand dollars during any calendar quarter, an addi- tional Financial Report must be filed for such quarter no later than sixty days following the last day of such quarter? ¢~ 7. Does your organization understand that the failure to file financial reports when due shall cause automatic revocation of the permit, and no such organization shall conduct any Bingo game or raffle thereafter until such report is properly filed and a new permit is obtained? ~ 2.i' 8. Does your organization understand that each Financial Report must be accompanied by a Certificate, verified under oath by the Board of Directors, that the proceeds of any Bingo game or raffle have been used for these lawful, religious, charitable, commu- nity, or educational purposes for which the organization is spe- cifically chartered or organized, and that the operation of Bingo games or raffles have been in accordance with the provisions of Article 1.1 of Chapter 8, Title 18.2 of the Code of Virginia?~P~ 9. Does your organization understand that a one percent audit fee of the gross receipts must be paid to the County of Roanoke • upon submission of the annual financial report due on or before ~~ the' first of November? kQ~ 10. Does your organization understand that this permit is valid only in the County of Roanoke and only at such locations, and for such dates, as are designated in the permit application? ~ 11. Does your organization understand that no person, except a bona fide member of any such organization who shall have been a member of such organization for at least ninety days prior to such participation, shall participate in the management, opera- tion, or conduct of any bingo game or raffle, and no person shall receive any remuneration for participating in management, operation, or conduct of any such game or raffle? y2., 12~~ Has your organization attached a check for the annual permit ~e'e in the amount of $25.00 a able p y to the County of ~oanoke, Virginia? ~ yQ~ ~ cc~ 13. Does your organization understand that any organization found in violation of the County Bingo and Raffle Ordinance or X18.2- 340.10 of the Code of Virginia authorizing this permit is subject to having such permit revoked and any person, shareholder, agent, member or employee of such organization who violates the above to having such permit revoked and any person, shareholder, agent, member or employee of such organization who violates the above referenced Codes may be guilty of a felony? ~QJ 4 s 7 14. Has your organization attached a complete list of its member- ship to this application form? /I/o 15. Has your organization attached a copy of its bylaws to this application form? ~ 16. Has the organization been declared exempt from propeprty t x - ' n under the Virginia Constitution or statutes? o /rv ~"~~ ti• ersonal p operty, If yes, state whether exemption is for real, p or both and identify exempt property. 17. State the specific type an pu~~~~ ~/the organization. 18. Is this organization incorporated in Virginia? Yp~ If yes, name and address of Registered Agent: w c+~ c•~. . G. vim, . 19. Is the organization registered with the Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Affairs pursuant to the Charitable Solicitations Act, Section 57-48 of the Virginia Code? o (If so, attach copy of registration.) Has the organizDe artmentnofr Agr c ulturemand Consumerg Affairs? by the Virginia p ~Jo (If so, attach copy of exemption.) ALL RAFFLE APPLICANTS DESCRIBE THE ARTICLES TO BE RAFFLED, VALUE OF SUCH ARTICLES, AND PROCEED TO NOTARIZATION. Article Description ~~ ~ ~A~~~~ Fair Market Value /,l e ~.~ ~ w$ em's '~' 2~ v~ ~ley0~' w~~- ~ z~ 5 7 NOT VALID UNLESS COUNTERSIGNED The above application, having been found in due form, is approved and issued to the applicant to have effect until December 31st of this calendar year. ~~~~~~ ~~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~~• Date Commissio r of th Revenue The above application is not approved. Date Commissioner of the Revenue 8 A-62387-7.g ITEM NUMBER=`~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BNORE COUNTYEADMINISTRATIONNOENTER COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROA 1987 MEETING DATE: June 23- SUBJECT: Request for Fireworks Permit from the Town of Vinton COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~~ ~ ~' SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: he Town of Vinton has requested a permit for a fireworks display T 1987, George Nester, Town Manager has to be held on July 4'lan to be followed in the attached letter. outlined the safety p own of Vinton has received approval from the Board for this The T fireworks display for several years. SUBMITTED BY: `~')G~~ ~ Mary H. Allen 1 k APPROVED BY: ~T~~ V" Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator Deputy C er ------------- _ ------------------------------------------- VOTE Abs -- ACTION No Yes X Motion by• Nickens/Brittle to X Approved ( ~ Brittle ~- approve Garrett --~ Denied ( ~ Johnson Received ( ~ _~- Referred McGraw _~ To ___ Nickens cc: File Fireworks Permit File ~'!.r To vvrv of vjN ~ T O N tOANO [EVALLE' P.O. BOX 338 ~~~~~~~ VINTON, VIRGINIA 24179 I June 18, 1987 Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Roanoke County Administration 3738 Brambleton Avenue Center Roanoke, Virginia 24015 S. W. Dear Board Member: A) _ ~ ,. ~,~ °. ~., The Town of Vinton is a July 4, 1886 at 9;30 PPlying for a Fireworks Display Permit for p'm•~ 814 Washington Ave., Vinton, Virginia. The following safety plan will be implemented f the display; or the duration of B) C) The Vinton Police Department will have four off- policeman supervising traffic control duty fireworks. During the fireworks exhibptltwoto and after the stationed at the perimeter of policemen will be two policeman stationed the restricted fallout zone and Avenue. Additional townat Meadow Street and Washington fallout zone. staff will be assistin g at the The Vinton Volunteer Fire crew on dut Department will have a y at the location of the fireworks display fighting The Vinton First Aid Crew will have on location vehicle, ambulance, and am le aid and to assist with crowd controlnat the re a squad zone, assist with first stricted fallout The company responsible for Unlimited of Yanceyville the display will be Fireworks combined single limit insurance coverane with Specialty Insurance Inc. $1.000,000. Petersbur ~ T.H.E. Insurancerovided by the Allied g, Florida. Company, of St. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, ~~~~ Ran Austin Assistant Town Manager RA/ml encl. ALLIED 8F`ECIALI'Y 7:N:~URANCE, INC. '' a • ~Yf~~ '~~..~tJ ai' ~'~' .. {••'1::. ::.f's.;':)~'{i.af'tir."1 ~ 1" f...[.~i•t.{.1~F•i ~ p 1 L f 1' E?r' ;t.....ia;f~:' -••:::.•.:, ; ••- ..:;,:;..1..! ~'~ii 'i'ii; Tiid i. F'{) 1. t c:v i~a 2 ?LG2i?i3 (~;{::~•~"k i 'i i c::.~'i i:~ I~ic, . CERTIFICATE ©F IN,~aURANCE .T.f'1 I `:ii I £> 'i' O t:: (:`i" 'i' I 'f' }' 'i' 1'l 11 't' {:> {) i. I C: 1 t'_1:':i t .'s '!' 1'7 E:? 77i:) fli{i: i)'~ P~!<:Inu:~i:l F i i-~worl•;s Un L i m i tec1, Inc r=iclci i 'i' i t) Yi<a i. :Cn<[ititr't•~{:1 F'. Cl, F.<ox 893 a. 7i iirJ.i"(?Ci TO~~Tl Of Vinton ('in{:1 Lanc~st~~-, F'A i7b03 Vinton VA 24179 <a }° c::' i r~ '(~ p r• c: {;~, :.i -i' t- hi ~ ~ i:! <:, 'i• {:., j-i : ~•- {;., ri 'i ,:, •:_: -P :. ~ i. i. p t,,r <.::• :' 3 f +. 1 Y'iC:f p't .f. 7i :it tA'i' cf 71 {:: (i) !°` ti !. 1 r: 'r p`••! l.tf!?t:) tr'• ;' S: . (} t. i i 4"'t'~:''i" i i)i:e t.., i r(11 'f'Q§ } j F:CF~f::WCIF~^<:`:"- ::IIf:)F~'I..r,l' 1 7LG212i3 ': :::'t`"; Ob/U:l/8? i '.~i,000,000 GwiL~ i_.:i:,*'1T3:1:(._T'T''r' :I:i`dt:i.i1~~:F`•r~i:;l::: I i s:::;:j:) Ob/pi/8£3 i '~' •,1"14 r: v :~: ii'ii l) i" i:7 71 {" k:r! i j i i ' ........... _..._..._ ............._......... _..._......._........ _......... __ ._..._ .... _.......... _.................. __......_....... _- - .. _.. _........._._..... _.........._..... _..i __ _..._.... _..... __._.._ __ ._._. _.. __ - _. f t t I a: P`'!t:';i.)rtr`ii~±C;i::: is l:~i~iF~'r•^•,~:',' ` ~ j j i ...._......... _...... _.. _ .............._. _......................._ .:......... _.. _...... __ .........._ ..................................-.... _..._._.... _._.._ _...._ _...... __ ._.i. _. _..._ --_...---. - . , I , ' .1 7: i' j'1 ;..: {:. .. nj i;•~ ill ~. s .. .. ~ ? Y? }' ti - +:"` 1 <3 '~ . .:. ~ ~ .. I i .. r5 '; s : ~~! 1 ...; (r., ;. 1. <} - t `:' t , t} i '.ir ::i i ' I' ) { 1. f .....r "; t -.. :.1. Yi r.i r::, i.. ..ii i 1 (i t, :, ;,•) f:.; { { . '; j'. t . •:9 a,' , -~".. ',J t; , i - ,.:, ; ry , ' ix'+' '. I t .: l ~' +1"i+i. i),.'i.i.. y .i ~ ., .. t\'!1 C.'t,`. .i.i..t i ... ... , i ' t.:., :". .. i ... ..: lx+? i:i , 'tt _. ~ :. i) i t. i :_t ! Uf,•:• .:i to (" i'I Yip "{: f C: C.-) ti: i"°i r:t i j. 1 rl'N~' '.}'•:i ~'' Yi'p' t),.- :. -~! <.: ! ':) k i t) i- •. ca%? i ~ ;; ,. :.}. i:) ii ~r'{ 'C t i .:: l.. + i{ii~l ct -ri y s .... ,_ .., + ;. '. ... i:~ :;.. .; .t .t. :. L...°.. i"i I ... P' .. •... {~T t 1": !. ~:i ~ f' - ~•~ . i t 1 f t t ~ A z ' i' ~ I 1 t July 4 1987 '~ ~'r":'~'":: To~~tn of Vinton ' '_t7a.ry Beth Layn~~.n .. ; ' °. , : ,r , ' '. Next Clear Ni P O B~ °" ox ~a8 ~a s:':~! ';...;~": _ :'-i°~{ {..; ; < ° ~3 300 00 Vinton, VA 24179 , . _....,,. ,; {.+li.,, rat:: ~.{.t..,i.-. . '..;.. , r 1 ..:..... ~.. :...:.: •, ;._ i~ ;' 8i=i t'~ashi.ngton Ave . Vinton, VA 24179 1.; i':: ,.:..:,~,- !' i'i I ~:. ,'i i{.:. 7i.;:.; •i' i::•: a_ .. ' ii':::,i i k~ ~ :... ::.nn:'Yi:a=,, r. ~i.sriia•:;i {; ';° c:r 1. °krs~'<.. •:i'tt ~:O'.1r, i ac:i ~'~ R r!, r ~ , ! ! T i 1Ti.- I'i) f. I r{r f)t..t.i ~'riai r 1 YI, .._. t'.',"1"T i...' I ~~ t.,,,,: li ~. 7- ~ i ;t z)r ~ Y~. i.:'r+tt,)._.i.. ~ .... 'j. i!r '" i t o.J!l 1 . f ! i+ . i ::. .. I i +, i Y s ... +.. ') L't?' 7" cd c t•!' ira ; f. ;. ~i i.:, { I. ': ?i , , ` : ~: ~ ) ' 1 f <"c t• r:, t,.~ - .1 ... - , t) i : IJ. , c !~l • i.t ..r.-~ !. 1 i t 1 sr-: i. [.i tl.; ! .{ f"-. + '•, '{: i rG; '1'.-) tti .., :; .,> .j t'' ! r i?'I ; E « .t ! ;i.'• ~-.. I ,. ~' .. . - { .. , , .. 1 } i ~ .. i s ... • r s. i F.i1'~ L :•t ,?' •~: i` i.., "i: - r.:, -1 P r . ~-t°~t-: ({) (. i.i)~di 7i<.• :~}°r• tat:3i:i r +:.rta i i °rt~°:>ut°r~.r:~•::>, r"tY:`. ; tt : rd ~'i :::-t}(:: Ii~t 't:iOYi~ iiij.)(}7i ri +.) lYl t;) !,i"~°l1:i Y'ti :!. %:•i'S+.')`•' i)' t:: prlUlil't ~ . t . . l . : 4 { I i : : :1. , . !' sl tht Y'!(c.t 01' 1 !F''•~ :g{.?ti (i'~' dl 7i :' J:~ 1. Ci~tii P °.i:!:' : to G;k:~i'f fa ", {' i'i ;:: i'1- ~ i17,i::'+:' :~i a :; i 3.'I" + 'ia , C+ i s-i Yt's• ja lAia I. f ~» <:rti'j'I"li)i" I'~"` (11"~~iY1'i' 1711;' :a I::[:;'Y'tfl ls. 't'i ,~lii,' :t.:ai!'IG?{:i ~si:a>(.i"f:?i:i; 1:)l:'i. i'tYl1.`,' :':i- i' F.• .:.F ..-... i ... cl t ft .. 7r <<r cif S ..r TI •., t) i1 I: Ci i f i'l':.' Ij t1!`, , 1'I E'"r;`. i)j:??~' i ci ! { {3 11'c; rY'f 'f•!'!F_:. ' ~ j^ '.' f flid "t" `:! i~'EiS:'> ldi" (.a (:{ a r°! f. fii p s:i id. ;i7 L'~!::! ! "f' ! i) 't't-:il i. 7i:a rilii9a t Yi`:ii r1i" l::' t.i cil Y'i j' i Y'ii:i Cr.'{:) 4:+ Yli:1 i:? Yi !.. C: {? YY't: i' 13 {:: 'i' {} p i.Ui i . t '(' E '~ • r:ac::. 'I: CY F:. {:f <' .i. ` ~:, is ~. ~:; y i) . t J:) {:'l"i c'a 4. i •i' I't {: <ci :.~5-::> tit' is-t:i . ~'!°. { i:i {:: {:`i" 'i i f i i :.:r 'k [:;' 1 4ir ti O "(' Lf cr !. 1 ..f ! l 4 t i (i• ,i s Y {) .; ! 't .,. . ~ f i 1 t 1 c) T i c'=i l lL i" i{i' l i i ~') i ~:a ~ {) l.~t ) t:, r.: o r) I ( :~ r ,_. n ti v =i . i cl f • / ~ ~ r - iclrr;:..... - .. tcl 'l' {::' U 1 •... iii' i" 't' i 'f i t:: ri •t r;~ .j. <.:i S:i tA;a T'; C: (i-• f:; lA ",' l , c; ;' t 'X. i-1c ~ .._. . .. . ::; i ] Yi<:I i is V (i~ v` F Fireworks Unlimited of North Carolina ~ ~,~, ~f~,l~~ Rt. 1, Box 2,57-A, Yanceyuille, N. C. 27379 Warehouse 1-919-694-6200 Telephone 1.919.694.9490 Bennie Cox -President )O~ )~ ~O~ K7t ~C7c.0(KX K~ IOC ~~} ~ ~'7a w~..~l. lY ~'~I n_} K_x rte.? ~ O(, ti-'} K7[ <7t,CJ! )0..~? +~"~f ~C11 A'~l ~O( Kit K}.O..O~ ~. YJt K~~ K'~ )Of fC~t X7~ ~ THIS CONTRACT AND AGREEMENT for the sale of Fireworks made and concluded this ei hteenth day of____June __________, A. D. 19_ 87 ____, by and between Fireworks Unlimited of North Carolina, Party of the First Part, and ______._Tc~xn.~f-~Zintc~n~_.Yir,;inia~--__.__._-______-_-----------------_-------- Party of the Second Part. WITNESSETN: For and in consideration of the sum of One Dollar, each to the other in hand paid, receipt of which is hereby ackhowledged, and of the terms and conditions hereinafter mentioned, the parties to this contract do mutually and severally agree to perform their several and respective covenants and to guarantee terms, conditions, and payments of this contract The party of the first part agrees to sell and furnish and deliver unto the party of the second part Fireworks to be exhibited in accordance with programs set forth and agreed upon at the time of the signing of the agreement, said Fireworks to be furnished for display on the following dates __.__~Iul~r~~1~3.Z --- provided the weather permits a display, it being mutually understood and agreed that should inclement weather pre- vent the giving of said display on said dates, a meeting of the parties will be held to discuss the post-ponement dates. It is agreed and understood by the parties hereto that in the event the Fireworks have been taken out and set up before the inclement weather and with good weather prevailing, then. such exhibition of fireworks must be carried out in the best possible manner without any deductions whatever from the hereinafter named compensations. The party of the first part agrees to furnish unto the party of the second part one or more trained personnel to present the said display, all such personnel to be the agent(s) of the party of the second part, and act under instructions and directions of the party of the second part. The said party of the second part agrees to procure and furnish a suitable place to display the said fireworks, and to secure all Police, Local and State permits, and also furnish a dry and convenient place to store the fire- works, where same may be prepared for display by the experts and agrees to furnish the necessary police pro- tection, (and such lumber and etc. as may be necessary for the erection of the set pieces, and also furnish the services of two laborers to assist in the erection and assembling of the display by the trained personnel. Prior to, during and immediately following the display, the party of the second part shall be solely responsible for keeping all persons (except the trained personnel and their designated help) out of the danger area and behind the safety zone lines. Following the display the party of. the second part shall be solely responsible for ALL cleanup and policing of the display area including, but not limited to, the removal of all unexploded fireworks, removal of frames, sets and lumber, and the refilling of holes. The said party of the second part agrees to pay unto the party of the first part, the sum of ~ 3 , 300.00 DOLLARS, for the said fireworks. Payment to be made as follows, 5f)~ ptr-cent---before-~idoort. $a+anee-~-~f-eanlraet-before Noort-of-the-+ast~da}rf?isptaq--te-be-gtaen: Payment to he made immediately following disalav In~~ranoe in the ant of $1, 000, 000 and tra(i~,n~ed personell to fire the dist~~l a ~ ^, ~~ ~: J All payments shall be made by Draft or Certified Check payable to the order of Fireworks Unlimited of North Carolina, unless otherwise specified and authorized in writing, and NO CASH shall be paid to agent without written authority. This contract shall not be construed to create a partnership between the parties or persons mentioned herein. In the event of fire, accident, strikes, delay, flood, act of God or other causes beyond the control of the party of the first part, which prevent the delivery of said materials, the parties hereto release each other from any and all performances of the covenants herein contained and from damages resulting from the breach thereof. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we set our hands and seals to this agreement in duplicate the day and year first above wntten. Fireworks Unlimited of North Carolina ATTEST BY - ;~ 'r ' , (SEAL) ~ -- A P P E A R A N C E R E Q U E S T PUBLIC HEARING ON ~~ P~ ~ ~' ~"' ~~ !/~,,,~ ~ ;,, , ~ ,..- _ ; I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so that I may comment. I agree to follow the guidelines listed below. WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. 1. Each speaker will have between three and five minutes available whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. 2• Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. 3. All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. 4. Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times . 5• Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. 6. INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. P L E A S E W R I T E L E G I B L Y NAME : _ I. ~ .~ .,' .-~ ~. g_. era ~ ~~ . ~ (' ,~-.~ ADDRESS : J' ,~~ -~ C.~~~:~',,°~, ~~ ,~' .~ ,, ~ ~--~ ~',~- , ,,~s , PHONE : _ ~ /`~~~;~ .,... t~ /° ,~., ~- ~ ~ "~ PLEASE NOTE: (After filling out, give to the Deputy Clerk. Thank you.) ITEM NUMBER ~`- AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKEONCO~ESDAYDMINISTRATION CENTER IN ROANOKE, VA., MEETING DATE: June 23, 1987 SUBJECT: Accounts Paid - May COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Payments to Vendors: $3,436,012.74 Payroll: 05/01/86 Bi-weekly $ 338,699.10 05/15/86 Bi-weekly 343,256.00 05/29/87 Bi-weekly 380,265.31 $1,062,220.41 1,062,220.41 $4,498,233.15 A detailed listing of the payments is on file with the Clerk to the Board of Supervisors. SUBMITTED BY: fV~CCrro.e~ ~" Diane D. Hyatt~~ Director, Department of Finance APPROVED: I l.~ ~` I~`,1 ~f Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ---------------------- ----------------------- VO'L'E ACTION No Yes Abs Approved ( ) Motion by: Denied Received ( ) Referred To Brittle Garrett Johnson McGraw Nickens ~" ,~.~ COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA RESERVE FOR BOARD CONTINGENCY Original Budget 7-1-86 $129,000 November 26, 1986 Health Insurance Coverage for Retired County Employees (6,300) December 16, 1986 Planning Commission Travel (2,046) December 16, 1986 Board of Equalization (4,000) January 1 3, 1987 Board of Supervisors and Management Staff Planning/ Goal Setting Work Session (6,500) January 1 3, 1987 Volunteers Training Seminar (2,500) February 10, 1987 Roanoke Valley Constitution's Bicentennial Commission (500) February 24, 1987 Sesquicentennial (10,000) March 24, 1987 Regional Airport Commission- Survey (13,224) April 7, 1987 Additional Insurance Premiums (45,000) April 28, 1987 Additional Detention Home Funds (8,000) June 2, 1987 Replace Stolen Microwave in Employee Lounge (Approved Administratively) (300) Balance of Board Contingency at June 23, 1987 30 630 Submitted by, 1~ ,~ , Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance ~- COiJ1~fPY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA TJNAppROPRIATID BALANCE Original Budget July 1, 1986 $1,584,637 February 10, 1987 Interest Expense for Short-Term Borrowing (100,000) April 7, 1987 West County Water Reservoir (310,000) April 7, 1987 Transfer to Schools of Unused 1985-86 Budget (65,128) May 26, 1987 Reserved for 1987-88 budget (100,000) Unappropriated Balance at June 23, 1987 $1,009,509 The recamiended level for fund balance for 1986-87 is $1,502,287 which is 3 percent of the total general fund budget. Submitted by, Diane D. Hyatt 1T- Director of Finance ~ ~I~ i Tyi ~ ~ F O ~ OO{ 1 O 4i u° I I Z OM . J ; W O d 1 m i,o m I ti O I~ I~ ti W ~ DS I I Lal - O CT N O aD O~ ~ ~ CO ~ 1 ~ I cD 'C t"1 I ~ I I ~ I ~ ', ' ; ~ i N O V'I .~-. O~ c'f eY O ~ O O vt O i 1 ~ ~ ~ ap M ~ O vl O O O of O O~ N O~ h~ M N O O ep ~ pl N f7 N O~ T O 1 N i N li (G~] ~ n N 1 ~ 1 O II M Vl ~ ..i N Vet N 1 ~-1 ~ a N ~ Nh ~ OIC O 1 W l~ -1 b ~ ti . i ~ ' -1 ~ N ( ~ '' ~ v I v 1 I ~1 fQy N w 7 {N/~ I i ~ O .y O S H [~ O b ~ In N~ O m m~ PJ m O a P O~ cn ~p O V' O .-1 of O O ~ v vl O O O~ i l`O') .h-1 N m m .PI ~O O~ VP' O [~ ~D [~ PND ~ C ' ~~ O a O O V ~O O 1 C Q] 1 M 11 ia01 O 1 I Vim' .~-I T~ eN+f o uN-1 1~ ~ O h P ~O O .O a('~7j h ~ ` ~ O C m Vf o O i O~ en O I e'f ^I N N O O~ P ' y~ ~ . -1 G ) ~ ; : ~C h O h N m C M N VI fV N N M H '~-1 n 'h-I ti h h N 1 C .~V O b 11 I I I ~ . y ti ~ I a+]. I O~ v .y li `' N O~ M N N 0 I ~ w ~ ~ it i I, O O m GO OI Vl m h v1 N ~ Cp OI T OI .p th ~O O [~ ~ M O i O O I C7 N 1 Cp m T h m aD~ m ul O~ T~ N m m OI ~ O~ O~ h' O+ I , Vf 11 m h 1 I I 11 N N m h VI O N T O PO .--I ~I m ~ ~ ~ l 1 ffJ mi m T l ! -1 CD OI O~ O~ C7 ut O O ~-i O ~p O O .N-1 M O+ f7 O+ N h ~G OD O+ ~O OI h Vl N h ~ ~ 1 ; I l~ M hl ~O O CO N N t7 V1 O ~N O~ V~ ~O ~/1 OI M m n b ~ ~ um'I ,7 Z F~ +f S~ Pl ~ 1 '. [~ C h : ~ M P O ~ V' ul N C9 ~O C V' t7 N m ~ ~ V' Y vl ~G 1 ~O ; I t~'I b O. O O O i N N .~-1 'm-1 PW N ~m-1 N .Y -1 M h N N 1 n j' Ir u'1 W V ~ . . ' -1 n ~ h {~ '-Ij C7 N N ~ I N r-1 ~~ I ~ ,1 I I 0 1 Lv1 1 11 I I ( I; 1 0 0 O O~ O O i I A I 0 0 0 O O O. O O O O O O O O O O O m 0 O O O OI X 0 0 ~ , O O O N O 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O h O ' C N O 1 N O O ~ O O O N O O O O O O .r t7, O v) O O O V1 O N O O O~ M O a°y j m ~O V~ M V' O P [~ ~ O 1~ i 1!1 O O'. O O Vl' O h P M m ~p O M O V1 In u'1 O [~ ~ 00 y~ ~ O N O N O t7 N' O N N O O Vl ~ O~~ O~ OD [~ N ~ ti O ~ 1 '-I O~ c'f P. V' i7 N Vl; N D+ Cp M N ` 1 N Of 1 ~ [7 N N ~ N. .-1 O~ 1M .-~ V' I i ~ C ~ I II 1 1 11 1 N I rl O [~ OI O . O pp OI m n9 ~ h ~ I p In M O~ a ~ O ~O 1/1' M~ O~ h ; I ) ~ OI O h Vf CD N_ ~. ~ N O~~ O~ CD PD.. _ O hi T .N-1 N ~ O 1 O 11 ti C ~ yy+ 1 '~ m {~ 1 C h h `0 ~ J ; '-I W ~p ~/I V' V' ~O NI O N t+l h i'7 i C u'1 M Vl ~~ h 1! h b~~ b v^+l b 0 ~. ~~ N~ 1~'f N W m vPj .p M N PND .hi O I O O O ~ P ~ 1 M N OmD N O II M h m H N M, , VI ti, !~ ~ aD .G ~p 1'~1 Cp 1 O p ! I C C I N Cn ~' rl N OI P N h N ; N ~ O , h m M '-I v -I ~ N ti O~, r-I ~-1 N . i C A M u N M ` Y1 N j ~ 'N-1 h N N H I r-1 ` m ' ~ ,G N. ~ 1 ~p ~ 11 1 1 ;gym ~ I 1 ~ ~O a Vl lf"f m N 0 I b~ Off' th1 0 n C 0 N.G N v'1 ' .. M ~ I ~ 1 11 ', : N O ~~ b rph-I ~O, [~ N N N C [~ YI N .G O~ h m O O O II ., [~ ~G a ~p MIC CD Vl O N C N In h C i~ ~ O 1~ 1 CO M [~ h' M Y [~ s7 O N t7 N O s07 1 Q 1 1 N O C to N h 0 c 7 N OI O O vt O .C O. i'~i N N V~ m Off' ~G ' 01 m N' H N m 11/1 h r-1 i i C <'1' V^"Il w N N O~ M 'M-1 ~ ti N N M O~ vet C rl N 1 M i '-1 PM ~ ` 1 I N [~ ~ ty N I H ` ~ !\ . -I N'.. ~ O uY ' .~-1 I 1 ; ~ ' 0 0 0 0 0 0 I O O v1 i 0 0 OI 0 0 0 ' 0 O O O O 0 0 0 .-1 O O l 0 0 0 0 O h ' O O O O O ~O O M~ O ~ ~ I I ', ~ 11 i 0 0 0 0 0 0 vt s~ ~p O ~p h aD 0 0 I N ~ ~ O O~ 0 0 0 r-I ~-I ~~~ ~ a m I ' - (((~~~ I I O ~ N v'I O ~ I N ~~~~ h N [~ N i'~f N ~ O~ O m~ ti , ( V ~~ O M ~ /f N I!1 O V~ Ml N NI •O V~ ~ i 0 O O O O M N W aD ~~ p j l 0 O O O N h h N O M O O~ ~; ~ ~/1 'm-1 N ~ ~p h O b C ~ t"1 N eM H r-1 [~ C7 M O u'1 N O p y O 1 N aD .- th N i N i .-. .-1 h ~ ti~ I~ ~ F 1 O I I I I C .p i i I 11 1 ~ F O I I ~ I ~~ W 1 V IV-I NN 6 I~ ~ ',~ ~ m ; , a I t~. ' ~ ' i W ~ ' ~ ;N y .. v i y I W ! V I C] w ea a4 0 a ~ . pp~ ~ ~ z ~ C i ~~ w c~. 1n s C ~ + I E6 M ~ y ~ fA a V ~ O ~. W ~ W F ~t ~ ~ ~ , 4 1 p ~ Pj ~ ++ ~ 0 ~ Q ~~ -.II yF ! H p ~ Z ~ ^ , y i.i F-~ W ~ 4. i~ai pl -I ~ Oi0 h V]. ~y ~j . ~ ~ Z ~ N 4] ~ O xxd W pT~I V 0 06 d W F ~ i O a W OO L LI u~ y ] i ~ F CCJ ~ ~ ~ d ~ O ~ S 0 t 0 0 N I w F J W Z V] m m ' V ` S p W 4i Ca W d d ~ . . J W. _ ~ p ~ p ! N V O N~ W y {4~' WW~.y I H Vl W ~ d 6 I W ri i . ~ F O y~ W 4. w ~ W '~ V] O p! G•J C.~ F W W W y 0 a CJ 1 W 0 W 4 y O I . U~ yy p~ G V' W W i Vj Z F Z p1 W ~ v] CK ~ W Z H Ms 6S ~ [+ . f l) I 5 a ~ ' W ; ,~Wp X 41 ~ H ~ i y Li~~ ~ ~ h O ~~~.r.I ppz ~ W'..W.7 ! V a /tl P=q ~ ~ ' ~ V m ' d O 1p--~I r-I y i pW~ pG 06 y N y O V~ 4i'i pp~yy w Pao S O Z pippp V' V x y i ~ S i M IO a N 0 W i[ p [ !] V F+ .] O ~ Z F m F m i ~ ~ I i ~ ~ i i i ,. y N- - ..., .. .. ..CL ~ ,.11 ~WMOf SSiNI'.llf ltltJOV1 L.., --- i L- -. `7/ COUNTY OF ROANOKE STATEMENT OF EXPENDITURES - MONTH ENDED MAY 31, 1987 BUDGET EXPENDED X GENERAL ADMINISTRATION __ _~ ______T_ ~,_,_,.._ __.__,__ _r_~___~_ _. 80ARD OF SUPERVISORS 8 _ 100,748 8 87,454 ~ 87 ~! COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR 260,616 235,960 91 PERSONNEL 195,143 175,944 90 ___ ___ _ COUNTY ATTORNEYv~~~ ~i ! ~ ___ 121,396 ~ _ 108,691 90 COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE 514,698 468,503 91 TREASURER 407,739 344,097 84 _ ~~LE~TION$ 120,102 104,514 87 SESQUICENTENNIAL 10,000 7,475 FISCAL bANAGEHENT SUPERINTENDENT OF FISCAL MANAGEMENT 70,691 65,942 93 COUNTY ASSESSOR 531,513 455,864 86 _. CENTRA~ACCOUNTIHG 350,592 278,179 79 PROCUREMENT 191,513 175,709 92 MANAGEMENT & BUDGET 63,237 51,556 8Z JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION CIRCUIT COllRT 91,601 11,984 ._~ 13 ____-- _ T. ~__..__ .___ _____ __~.___.__._ _ ____ GENERAL bIST&ICT COURT ___ __ 21,145 _ 9,167 43 MAGISTRATES 730 459 63 J fi D DISTRICT COURT 6,546 4,894 75 _ __ __ _ __ ~~CLERK OF CIRCUIT COURT ~ ~ _ 446,823 368,619 82 COMMONWEALTH'S ATTORNEY 276,952 246,731 89 PROBATION OFFICE 33, 825 33, 253 98 _ _____________ PUBLIC SAFETY POLICING & INVESTIGATING 3,453,082 3,052,509 88 HIGHWAY SAFETY COMMISSION 960 171 18 FIRE 1,700,412 1,550,151 91 RESCUE SQUAD 455,651 412,683 91 ~~ EMERGENCY SERVICES~~ 36,358 34,793 96 CONFINEMENT/CARE OF PRISONERS 1,801,663 1,642,753 91 ANIMAL CONTROL 147,902 133,661 90 PUBLIC FACILITIES SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC FACILITIES 182,851 144,992 79 STREET LIGHTS 110,845 81,110. 73 ENGINEERING 204,683 151,976 74 BUILDINGS & GROUNDS 1,554,788 1,163,308 75 PARKS & RECREATION 983,238 772,778 79 DRAINAGE 175,079 71,945 41 REFUSE l, 354, 259 1, 0 66,168 79 _ ____ PARK DEVELOPMENT ___ 49,397 . 48,595 98 PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION 168,709 91,535 54 ~ ~ _. ._..,......-..... _~,._.._.. ..__. _._-.,_,T-- .....____ .., COUNTY OF ROANOKE STATEMENT OF EXPENDITURES ~ _ MONTH ENDED MAY 31, 1967 HEALTH & SOCIAL SERVICES PUBLIC HEALTH X359,693____ 359,694_ ~_ 100 _ _ SOCIAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION 1,689,870 1,468,220 87 PUBLIC ASSISTANCE 893,986 611,953 68 INSTITUTIONAL CARE 51,500 8,454 16 SOCIAL SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS 94,984 94,984 100 DEVELOPMENT S1IPERINTENDENT OF DEVELOPMENT 97,334 88,885 91 PLANNING & ZONING 233,197 209,207 90 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 81,731 70,464 ~ 86. _ _ ____,._ -DEVELOPMENT REVIEA 95,184 87,321 92 PLANNING COMMISSION 19,581 17,059 87 CONSTRUCTION BUILDING SERVICES. _ _ _196,911__ _._...__.187,165 ____ ~_ 95__ _.___-__ ___._. NON-DEPARTMENTAL LIBRARY ~ 1, 009, 412 __ _~ 924, 544 `_~ 92 ~__. _ _ ~~ EXTENSION & CONTINUING EDUCATION 89,700 62,489 70 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 421,062 371,095 88 INSURANCE __ 687,082 676,16_0 __ 98 _~_._ ~~.__:__ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ CONTRIBUTIONS TO SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS 24,600 24,600 100 FLOOD DISASTER EXPENSE 0 17,931 MISCELLANEOUS 784,176 334,449 43_ TOTAL 23,025,690 19,268,797 "' 84 TRANSFERS REIMBURSABLE EXPENDITURES __.. _.______.__ __ _-___ _.. ~ 4,-069.___.__ _______.__ ___~..___~ ._-_-__ __ _ _ DEBT SERVICE 2,174,544 2,230,556 103 TRANSFER TO INTERNAL SERVICE 127,423 0 0 TRANSFER TO SCHOOL OPERATING FUND 24,731,128 17,743,538 _- 72 __~. TRANSFER TO UTILITY CAPITAL 625,195 0 0 CAPITAL PROJECTS TRANSFER 2,413,550 534,163 22 RESERVE FOR BOARD CONTINGENCY __ __ . _---._.. _.38, 930.._._ ._-__-_^ _ ..____._ ___~__Q__-_ _ _ .... _._ e.._-_..__-_ ___ _ ___ _ .. _- __ _ _ _ UNAPPROPRIATID BALANCE 1,325,453 0 0 TRANSFER TO YOUTH HAVEN 96,356 0 0 TRANSFER TO GRANT FUND ____._ __ _-.-~ _. ___-----_..35__ _ _._ _. ~ _ ___---_9 _ _- _. _ _____.....__ .-__-- TOTAL TRANSFER ITEMS 31,532,614 20,512,326 65 GRAND TOTAL 8 54,558,304 8 39,781,123 73 A-62387-~0 8 H_~, ITEM NUMBER (p AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER IN ROANOKE, VA., ON TUESDAY, MEETING DATE: June 23, 1987 SUBJECT: Richfield Retirement Community, Special Exception, Home for Adults COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Petitioner requests a Special Exception Permit from the Board of Supervisors to construct and operate a home for adults facility. If successful, petitioner will construct 11 units, each of which will consist of two attached single family residences. Petitioner currently owns and operates an existing home for adults facility that has a capacity for 589 occupants. These facilities; the Richfield Nursing Center, the Oaks Home for Adults, the Knollwood Retirement Apartments, and the Ridgecrest Retirement Apartments, as well as the location for the proposed units are situated on approximately 48.5 acres. The zoning for the residential portion of the Richfield Retirement Community is B-2. This zoning classification was granted in April 1975. The definition of a home for adults, contained within the zoning ordinance, § 21-20, is a facility that provides shelter and services which may include meals, housekeeping, and personal care assistance primarily for the elderly. Residents are usually functionally impaired and socially isolated but otherwise in good health; and are able to maintain a semi- independent life style, not requiring the more extensive care of a nursing home. Petitioner has been requested to submit a statement that stipulates that the proposed land use is a home for adults as defined above. The land use designation for the Richfield Retirement Community is Core. High density residential development such as that which is being proposed is encouraged within this land use designation. Fire and Emergency Services has stated that there will be no problem furnishing fire and rescue services if the petition is granted. Water is available in Alleghany Drive, south of the site and also from an existing service line that provides water to the high rise structures on the site. Source of water from the City of Salem is good; Roanoke County distribution system is fair. Sewer service is available on site. County collection capability is good; treatment capacity is fair. Proper drainage will require on site detention. Engineering Department requests CJ~~°~ a condition requiring the construction of a detention facility with a 10-year storm capacity and a 2-year postdevelopment release. Engineering also comments that the existing lake on site may not have a defined emergency spillway. The 100-year flood elevation for the site should be established and all structures should be located above this elevation and away from the emergency spillway. If not done previously, the dam embankment should be evaluated for structural adequacy. Engineering suggests that a loop road instead of two cul-de-sacs be constructed to facilitate on site circulation. FISCAL IMPACT: Richfield Retirement Community is tax exempt. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of this petition with conditions for drainage, detention and road circulation attached. Petitioner's statement defining the use as a home for adults should also be included as an attachment to the statement of action below. SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED: Rob Stalzer / lmer C. Hod , Jr. Director of Planning County Administrator Approved ( ~ Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred To Motion by: approve ACTION Nickens/McGraw to VOTE No Yes Abs Brittle X Garrett X Johnson X McGraw X Nickens X cc: File Rob Stalzer Tim Gubala r.._ ,- ~' ~'- ~,~ D unoru AN h, E t 2 ~~ ROANOKE COUNTY Richfields Retirement Community DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT Special Exception Permit (Home for Adults) ^ ^v~~~^ ~ ~ mn^ .p O ~ -~ 0 0 m o , ~ -{ ,r ,'~_. b ~ ~ ~ J 1 ^~~0' '° w -^-; ;;; ors _ ..~F% i ~ I a~ _.__ ~~ 3 aY ~' ii. I i :~ ~~~. o i _ %'8 c ~ i i 1,r I 1 I: 11 ilk I~I i I ~ 1 R_ i I I ~'~ I ~'~ i;~ ~I is ,: ~ is ~i~ 1 ~ .u.e~' I i ~ ~~~ I I ~ I ~ rl ~ 7 .~ ~ ~ - ~a 4 1 '+e .,:e °p •~, ° ah One ~ -.~~,~ N b 4YMN°~N 4j~aM10~°9 yIN"LI^ ~~-.z ~~ ~ ~'/~ ._Y_ 6p S ~ ~: o z° s c° 1 z = I A ~ li 2 - _ _ i 2 ~ ~ 3 ~ ~ - j ' ~ ~ n `- ~ -~ i r; ~z~ a 6€~ra`. . n ~ Z ' U = ° : g o n ~ °' ~ ~ Y D < F ~ O h ~~ ~E s= ~t si n'~~y ts, i ~ ~ y ~ i i ~ an°I~ Z~85 1 .: ~ -- ti v ~iwoo D ~° n qx ~~ ZO t~ -~ i c r ~ C~ ~- ~~ iY !l r 7> ~ in % ~ ~ ~~`!/ %~~ P R I~ 1' _~, r 0 A ~l~~ / 11 a ~ Y ~ _N _ ~ •~ gm -~ _ ~ 0 . Y ~ f f ~ ~( 6'~ ~t ' ~ S t 7 ~ / J r1 G '~~ RIGtiPIELD fL~TIR+=1YlET•3T ~Cp~••~MUNi f f m Z -( I ~` fi, i 1 (VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY ~A 7.77 acre parcel of land, ) generally located on U.S. Highways ) 11 and 460, West of Salem, Virginia ) PROFFER between Knollwood Drive and ) OF Alleghany Drive within the Catawba ) CONDITIONS Magisterial District, and recorded ) as parcel #55.09-1-16 in the ) (Roanoke County Tax Records. ) TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY: Being in accord with Sec. 15.1-491.1 et seq. of the Code of Virginia and Sec. 21-102-4 of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance, the Petitioner Richfield Retirement Community hereby voluntarily proffers to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia the following conditions to the granting of a Special Exception use for the above-referenced parcel of land: 1. The Petitioner agrees to maintain an on-site surface water detention facility in accordance with the applicable ordinances of Roanoke County. 2. The Petitioner operates a full service retirement LAW OFFICES WOODS,ROGERS & HAZLEGROVE ROANOKE, VA. community on its approximately 45.8 acres in Roanoke County. Within this community are the following levels of ser~rices: a) The nursing center which provides skilled and intermediate care designed to meet all medical needs except surgery; b) A convalescent center providing residents of this facility with sheltered care; and c) Housing units which provide retirement housing for the elderly and medical services. The purpose of the present Petition is to obtain a Special Exception Use for the construction of additional housing units for the elderly. In doing so, the Petitioner is supplementing its existing facilities providing this level of service. The Roanoke County Code defines a home for adults in X21-20. The Petitioner believes that its intended use of the property which is the subject of this Petition is within the use defined and contemplated by the aforesaid Code definition. Respectfully submitted, Richfield Retirement Community B ~~~ ~ . Y It Attorney Woods, Rogers & Hazlegrove 105 Franklin Road, S.W. Roanoke, Virginia 24011 LAW OFFICES WOODS,ROGERS 3 MAZLEGROVE ROANOKE, VA. -2- LEONARD G. MUSE CAR ROLL D. REA WILBUR L. HAZLEG ROVE FRANK W. ROGERS,JR. WILLIAM B. POFF M. CALDW ELL BUTLER JOHN L. WALKER, JR. MICHAEL K. SMELTZER THOMAS T. LAWSON TALFOURD H. KEMPER DANIEL 5. BROWN FRANK K. SAUN DERS JAMES F. DOUTHAT JAMES W. JENNINGS,JR. ALEXANDER I. SAUNDERS BAVARD E. HARRIS JOHN P. GROVE ALTON L. KNIGH TON, JR. DANIEL F. LAYMAN, JR. CLINTON S. MORSE HEMAN A. MARSHALL, III BRIGGS W. ANDREWS H. ALLEN GLOVER, JR. THOMAS T. PALM ER DOUGLAS W. DENSMORE DUDLEY F. WOODY JAMES B. MASS EY, III WILLIAM P. WALLAC E, JR. HAND DELIVERED WOODS, ROGEAS SC HAZLEGI?OVE 105 FRANKLIN ROAD, S.W. P.O. BOX 720 BOANOKE, VIRGINIA 24004-07 20 TELEX 3792815 TELECOPIER 703 982-4216 TELEPHONE 703 982-4200 DIRECT DIAL NUMBER .982-4252 June 24, 1987 Ms. Mary Allen Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Roanoke County Administration Center 3738 Brambleton Avenue, S.W. Roanoke, VA 24015 SAMUEL G. WILSON DIANNE E. H. WILCOX JOHN T. JESSEE MICR AEL A. CLEARV W. FAIN RUTH ERFORD THOMAS A. LEGGETTE THOMAS J. HALL RICHARD D. LUCAS BRIAN R. JONES NAN L. COLEMAN STEVEN D. HEDGES D. STAN BARNHILL JOSEPH W. MILAM, JR. MICHAEL F. URBANSKI RICHARD C. MAXWELL RICHARD R. SAYERS FAITH M. WILSON BRADLEY W. FITZG ERALD ANDREW T. SANDERS, JR. FRANK K. FRIEDMAN PHI LLIP D. PAYNE, IV STEVEN J. TALEVI THEODORE R. KINGSLEY ELIZABETH K. HILLMAN DEBORAH A. OEH LSCHLAEGER MARTHA E. WITH ROW TERRI F. DIAL Re: ~ecial Exception Use-Richfield Retirement Community Dear Ms. Allen: Enclosed herewith please find plat of survey of the 7.77 acres for which the above Special Exception Use was granted by the Board of Supervisors at their meeting held on June 23. As you will note, the plat is dated June 8, 1987 and was prepared by T. P. Parker & Son, Engineers & Surveyors, Ltd. We further enclose a metes and bounds description prepared by Mr. Parker's office under the same date. Please do not hesitate to give me a call should you have any questions or need any further information. As always, I appreciate your help and cooperation. Yours very trul ~~e l~. M chael K. Smeltzer MKS/tlc Enclosures Richfield R irement Community ,,.. ;. T. P .PARKER & SON Engineers and Surveyors, Ltd. TELEPHONE 816 BOULEVARD 387-1183 TULLY P. PARKER. P.E. & L5. SALEM. VIRGINIA AREA CODE JOHN T. PARKER. P.E. & L5. 241 33 703 FRANK B. CALDWELL III. P.E. Ac L5. P.O. BOX 39 June 8, 1987 Description of 7.77 acre tract being under consideration for variance Richfield Retirement Community Alleghany Drive, Roanoke County, Virginia BEGINNING at a point on the west side of Alleghany Drive (Va. Sec. Rte. 642), on the south side of an unnamed existing private street; thence leaving said Beginning point and with the west side of Alleghany Drive, S. 42° 57' 30" E. 125 feet to a point; thence continuing with Alleghany Drive, S. 36° 37' 43" E. 194.93 feet to a point; thence continuing with Alleghany Drive, S. 26° 59' E. 43.64 feet to a point; thence continuing with Alleghany Drive, N. 63° 10' E. 12.50 feet to a point; thence continuing with Alleghany Drive, S. 26° 59' E. 23 feet to a point; thence with eight new lines through the property of Richfield Retirement Community, S. 43° 10' W. 335 feet to a point; thence S. 20° 30' W. 293.5 feet to a point on the north side of an existing private road; thence along the north side of the existing private road with a curve to the right whose arc is 186.65 feet and whose radius is 405 feet (chord equals N. 80° 00' W. 185 feet) to a point; thence continuing with another curve to the right whose arc is 39.47 feet and whose radius is 55.89 feet (chord equals N. 46° 33' 56" W. 38.66 feet) to a point on the east side of Knollwood Drive, a private road; thence with the ~ ~ Description of 7.77 acre tract being under consideration for variance Richfield Retirement Community Roanoke County, Virginia June 8, 1987 Page 2 east side of Knollwood Drive, N. 26° 20' W. 410.91 feet to a point; thence continuing and leaving Knollwood Drive, N. 63° 15' E. 134 feet to a point; thence N. 17° 30' W. 162.50 feet to a point on the south side of the aforesaid existing street; thence along the south side of said street, N. 66° 30' E. 448 feet to the Point of BEGINNING and being a 7.77 acre tract and being as shown on plat titled Rezoning Plat for Richfield Retirement Community by T. P. Parker & Son, Engineers and Surveyors, Ltd. dated June 8, 1987. This description should not be used for the conveyance of property but only for description in the rezoning petition. PRUPERTY OF' IN~L15TRiAl. pE.YEI.. A _ .~ORIT( OF GRAN . ~~ A2° 51 3 5 ~2~ QA `~ \i 1,1 Co'~° 10 E !~ 12.r,.,0' ~ Q2 5 2(0° 59' E 43.4' KE CA( , rY (-~Ax No. 55.1o-a-edl 2~0° ~' E -rte fZ7E • 11 --' 23' 1103• ~'S D~ FCC 15T 1 N C~ ZO IJ I NCB ~ F3 - 2 ~i~ s, o, -~, 7 7 AC . W Z F- ~ ~...~ ~ o ~~ ~~ . ~ ~ AKE .. ~--. ICo2.5O' ~-tJ I~° 30' W iD _ 0~ ~ ~ uZ 9 N~ Z 0 ~o 5u 1_5-r, BRICK # FR. R~STAIlRANT 410.°ll~ -•-1~1 2Cn° 20' W Q ~' ~• 0 rA u ~ 1 ~r ~_ -goo `~93 3p , S ~,~ w fy N R°405' ~ A= ISCo.loS' ,~' Cµ~N80°00'W 185' ~ ~~ " R= 65.81' `A = 39.41' GN = N 4C°° 33' 6Co' W 38. ~' KNOT-L1N4~~ oR~vE REM A l tJ i tit U E' R>~ P E RT`( f- MTV ITTY No A'~NO 5 iZOQ ~-O~E OF /ALLEY, i NC. EX-STIPIG Z,pNINCa = B-Z ~ :: y ,0. t, F i~ ~ . ~ r ,., •.. }{' ' f4 1 i ' ;~ .,.Rrf :;c;. ? ;~ ~ "', , . .~ a~ V.'.{,', t' ~ A, S . i REZD tJ I tVG PLAT FOQ -,~~ ~ ~~,-~r~cMF-IT rnMM~~AIITY PETITIONER: T.D. STEELS ~• CASE ~~: 24-6/87 Planning Commission Hearing Date; June 2, 1987 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: June 23, 1987 1. REQUEST t~ ~~s~ Petition of T.D. Steele to rezone approximately 8.77 acres from RE, Residential Estates to B-2, Business to construct a nursing hane and physical therapy center located on the north side of Buck Mountain Road immediately west of the Blue Ridge Parkway in the Cave Spring Magisterial District. 2. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION There were four present in opposition at the Planning Commission Public Hearing who voiced the following concerns: a thoroughfare from Turkey Hollow Road to Buck Mountain Road would create unsafe streets and lower property values. 3. SIGNIFICANT IMPACT FACTORS a. Screening and Landscape: As per ordinance. However, specific proffers should be secured with respect to screening fran the Blue Ridge Parkway. b. Circulation: It should be determined whether access road serving the project from Buck Mountain Road will be State maintained and whether it will connect with Turkey Hollow Road in the Hunting Hills Subdivision, whether the petitioner already awns the right-of-way necessary for the construction of this road. Internal circulation is well designed. c. Basin: Engineering conxnents that downstream drainage is a problem. R that developer proffer detention facilities capable of handling a l0year storm with a two year pre-development release. 4. PROFFERED CONDITIONS a. The uses on the property will be as follows: nursing home; and (b) physical therapy center or related clinic/hospital special care; and (c) commercial uses complementing the needs of said community, as more fully described in § 21-23-2(a)(2) of the Roanoke County Code. b. The height of the structures on the property will not exceed 35 feet. c. Detention facilities will be established on site which will handle a ten-year storm with a two-year predevelolsnent release. d. The developer does not intend to use Turkey Hollow Road to provide access to the above referenced property. 5• COMMISSIONER'S MOTION, VOTE AND REASON r'Ir. Witt moved to approve the petition with proffered conditions. The motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Fddy, Jones, Flippen, Witt, Winstead NAYS: None ABSENT: None 6. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE a. None. 7. ATTACHMENTS ~/ Concept Plan (8~" x 11") :~ ~ Vicinity Map (8~" x 11") Staff Report Other Robert Stal er, Planning Canission Secretary ~ ~~ ~ <:'? . ' ' ,~ ~-- „~_ ; STAFF REPORT CASE NUMBER: 24-6/87 PETITIONER: T.D. STEELE REVIEWED BY: ROB STALZER DATE: MAY 26, 1987 Petition of T.D. Steele to rezone a Residential Estates to B-2 PProximately 8.77 acres from RE, physical thera Business to construct a nursing home and Py center located on the north side of Buck Mountain Road immediately west of the Blue Ridge Parkway in the Cave S r' Magisterial District, p In g 1. NATURE OF REQUEST a• Unconditional request to construct and operate a nursing home and a physical therapy center. These uses will be developed in conjunction with a congregate care facility and adult townhomes on adjacent property that is alread nursing home will contain 120 beds, the physicalzcare center will house 60 beds. For purposes of determining densit y, 180 beds are equivalent to 60 dwelling units. The density of the project is 6.8 units per acre. The h offer services only to persons residinglinatheare center will the general public, project and not b. Attached concept plan and zoning vicinity map describe project more fully, ~ 2• APPLICABLE REGULATIONS a• B-2 zoning district permits a wide variety of retail service and office uses. Petitioner has not specified by way of roffer which of these uses will be conducted on the property, P b• VDOT commercial entrance permit required. c• Site plan review required to insure compliance with County regulations. 3• SITE CHARACTERISTICS a. Topography: Gently sloping towards Buck Mountain Road. b• Ground Cover: Low growing scrub and the former Starkey Dra Strip, g 4• AREA CHARACTERISTICS a• Future Growth Priority: community planning area. Property has urban servicE line extensions are made. b• General area is sparsely immediately adjoins the Blue Situated within the Cave Spring Designated for stable growth. ~s available if significant utility developed, rural residential that Ridge Parkway right-of-way, 5~. LAND USE IMPACT ASSESSMENT Rating: Rate each factor according to the action. Use a scale of 1 through 5. 1 = positive impact, 2 = negligible impact, 4 = disruptive impact, 5 = severe impact, and RATING FACTOR COMMENTS impact of the ~~~~~ proposed 3 = manageable impact, N/A = not applicable. LAND USE COMPATIBILITY 3 a. Comprehensive Plan: placed this area within9a5DevePopmentllandeuseopatetorlan has petitioner's request is a planned residential development type of land use consisting of elderly housin project is 6.8 dwelling units per acre which ise within tthe range of 4 to 8 units established by the land use plan. Petitioner's request is consistent with the land use plan map and all defined policies with the exception of D-1. 3 b. Surrounding Land: Parcel is screened from view of adjacent subdivision by thick existin vegetation. Adjoins rural residential development and Blue Rid e P k scattered g ar way. ? c. Neighboring Area: Mixed residential. 3 d. Site Layout: Adequate. 3 e. Architecture: Materials not specified; however, heigh building will not t of exceed 35 feet (approximatel stories.) Y each 2 t o 2~ 4 f. Screening and Landscape: As proffers should be secured withe a . l respect to screening Blue Ridge Parkway. from the ? g. Amenities: Adequate parking. ? h. Natural Features: No negative effect. TRAFFIC 3 i. Street Capacities: approximately 2,000 expected to be fewer there permanently and 4 j, Current ADT on Buck Mountain Road is vehicles. Anticipated ADT from project than 200 vehicles. Most residents will be will not travel offsite often. Circulation: It should be determined whether access road serving the project from Buck Mountain Road will be State maintained and whether it will connect with Turkey Hollow Road in the Hunting Hills Subdivision, whether the petitioner alread owns the right-of-way necessary for the construction of this road. Internal circulation is well designed. UTILITIES 3 k. Water: Adequate source and distribution will be available within 12 months. Fire and Emergency states that development should not commence unless petitioner is able to comply with the new water standard. 3 1 . S ewer : ~~^ -.~'' ~ ~° Adequate treatment; however, a 1,000 foot extension will be required to insure adequate transmission. DRAINAGE 4 m. Basin: Engineerin roblem. 9 comments that downstream drainage is a p Requests that developer proffer detention facilities capable of handling a 10-year storm with a two year pre- development release. N/A n. Floodplain: PUBLIC SERVICES ? o. Fire Protection: Within adequate service standard. comments in item k above. See 2 N/A q. Parks and Recreation: N/A r. School: 1 TAX BASE s• - Land and Improvement Value: - Taxable Gross Sales/Year: Approximately $5 million - Total Employees: 130 $4 million - Total revenue to the County/year: Approx' ENVIRONMENT ? t. Air: ? u• Water: ? v. Soils: ? w. Noise: 3 x. Signage: Not specified. imately $100,000 6• PLAN CONSISTENCY This area is designated as Development. The petitioner's request is consistent with the land use plan and the stated policies with the exception of D-l. ~. STAFF EVALUATION a. Strengths: (1) Conforms with land use policy statements with the exception of plan map and defined well designed, 1• (2) Site layout b. Weaknesses: (1) The B-2 zoning district commercial and institutional activitieSpermits a wide range of should be limited b wa This range of uses available for fire flow.y of proffers. (2) Adequate water must be (3) Drainage improvements that exceed the requirements of the Count considered. (4) Additional screen,ingdfroma he BlduenRidges Paurkwae should be specified. Y P• Rescue: Within adequate service standard. 'rte ~~\ r "p s F. r r F t r i • f' • r~ Z . i ~\ ~ ~~ i~ •~ •y i. ~.: >} '{, ~ - . , !~(~ ~. . ~ `~ \ ~'..__ - - ~ ~~ •. ~. i._ ~ ~ ~ - ~ .. - -- ~~~ ~ ~~~ , it o:, i i ~. ~ ~ ~ ', ~ ~~ '~ h - - ~,..: i r ~ ~. • , - _ _ ••••••••N•• •••••~••+ {- - ~. ~ • •••••~~•f11~ ' / ~ • • ~•• 1 ~~ • ".......:...4......... .. - d ~r ~ N _ .`•b SK~LAMD RD 0J ~TR~ \~' / .Y'' ~ ~ 3' J '-riff ~g rA ~~j,, ~F- \~ • _• Q4 S ~ RN PI i~ I ~ HUNTING Rf1,L5 ~ ;?"~ ~,\\ \ ~ I o Nay p, _ -n v.. / SCE \` t~ ~tcori RiocEJ //`,'I'/ _ _ , _-Soul / \~ $' Cf // `.\'. M ~ ~'~~ \J / ~t~ ,10151, N /_,~_` ~9 67 ~. ~YO _ _ jy . _ ~.. J ~ ~ MRIb~AY ACRE arwaro _ -' _ , '-- BUCK ' M tAi ~% -• "--.-_,arw.s ___ ..~-_ Ro_ _-_ -\ -VICINITY MAP ~ Rt .Bl,~~ ~,~5 e ~~~ -- ~~kwG1' ,~ .. __ - __ 4 ~M~- _ ti I~ L ~£ . .~; ~1 ---..... / j. ~,. ~ ~~__yi ~ _ i \~ ~ 1 ROANOKE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT T•~• Steele RE to B-2 VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY Re: Rezoning of four tracts of ) land (7.47 acre tract of land ) currently a part of Tax Map P23cel j No. 87.20-1-10, and Lots 22, pETITION and part of 24 further identified ) as Tax Map Parcels 97.08-1-1, ) 97.08-1-2 and 97.08-1-3) located ) on State Route 679 (Buck Mountain ) Road) adjacent to the Starkey ) Dragstrip, within the Cave Spring j Niagisterial District TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY: Your Petitioner, T. D. Steele, respectfully files this petition pursuant to Chapter 21 of the Code of Roanoke County and in accordance with the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended, and would respectfully show the following: 1) Petitioner is the title owner of the 7.47 acre parcel of land referenced above and is the contract owner of Lots 22, 23 and part of 24 referenced above. Belva E. Hall, title owner of said lots, consents to this petition as evidenced by her execution of the application submitted herewith. 2) The property is presently zoned under the provisions of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance as R-E District. 3) The property is designated as "development" property in the Future Land Use Guide of the Roanoke County Comprehensive Development Plan. 4) Petitioner wishes to have the property rezoned as B-2 District for the purpose of constructing and operating a nursing home and physical therapy center. 5) Petitioner believes the rezoning of said land to be in the best interest of all concerned. WHEREFORE, Petitioner respectfully requests that the Zoning Ordinance of Roanoke County be amended and that the above-referenced parcels of land be rezoned and reclassified to B-2. FURTHER, your Petitioner requests that this petition be referred to the Secretary of the Roanoke County Planning Commission for its consideration and recommendation. Respectfully submitted, T. D. Steele ~'~ of Counsel Robert E. Glenn Maryellen F. Goodlatte Glenn, Flippin, Feldmann & Darby P. 0. Box 2887 Roanoke, Virginia 24001 Counsel for Petitioner 2 <.: "~'~ L E G A L N O T I C E Notice is hereby given to all interested persons that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at 7:00 p.m, on Tuesday, June 23, 1987, in the Community Room at the Roanoke County Administration Center, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, S.W., Roanoke, Virginia, on the petition of Scott and Snyder Service Bureau, Inc., requesting rezoning from M-1 Industrial to B-2 Business of a tract containing 0.574 acre and located on the north side of Peters Creek Road approximately 60 feet east of Centurion Road in the Hollins Magisterial District. Rezoning has been requested to construct a retail store providing computer data processing, sales, and service. The County Planning Commission recommends approval with proffered conditions. A copy of the Zoning Ordinance of Roanoke County and amendments thereto as well as a copy of the petition, site plan, and other documents related to this request may be examined in the office of the Department of Development, located in Room 600 at the Roanoke County Administration Center. Roanoke County will provide assistance to handicapped persons desiring to attend public hearings. Such individuals are requested to contact the County office of Personnel Services ([703J 772-2018) if special provisions are necessary for attendance. Given under my hand this Third day of June, 1987. ~. C.~ Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Please publish in the evening edition of the Roanoke Times and World News on: Tuesday, June 9, 1987 'Tuesday, June 16, 1987 Direct the bill for Publication to: Scott and Snyder Service Bureau, 2105 Electric Road S. W. Roanoke, Virginia 24018 VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY Re: Rezoning of four tracts of ) land (7.47 acre tract of land ) currently a part of Tax Map P23ce1 No. 87.20-1-10, and Lots 22, RECOMMENDATION and part of 24 further identified ) ROANOKE COUNTY PLANNING as Tax Map Parcels 97.08-1-1, ) COMMISSION 97.08-1-2 and 97.08-1-3) located ) on State Route 679 (Buck Mountain ) Road) adjacent to the Starkey ) Dragstrip, within the Cave Spring j Magisterial District TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY: WHEREAS, your Petitioner T. D. Steele, has filed with the Secretary to the Planning Commission a petition to rezone the above-referenced parcels of land from R-E District to B-2 District for the purpose of constructing and operating a nursing home and physical therapy center; and WHEREAS, the petition was referred to the Planning Commission which, after due legal notice as required by Section 15.1-431 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended, did hold a public hearing on June 2, 1987; and WHEREAS, at that public hearing all parties in interest were afforded an opportunity to be heard; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due consideration, has recommended to the Board of County Supervisors that the rezoning be approved. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission recommends to the Board of County Supervisors of Roanoke County that above parcels of land be rezoned to B-2 District. The above action was adopted on motion of r-OYL,S2CLUZd_b-y------------------------- and Don W ~.~ - upon the following recorded votes: AYES: Eddy, Jones, Flippen, Witt, Iginstead NAYS: Ndn~e !~ ~ ~~.~I ABSENT : None Se~ eta , Roanoke County Planning Commission 2 ,~ ..- VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY Re: Rezoning of four tracts of ) land (7.47 acre tract of land ) currently a part of Tax Map P23ce1 j No. 87.20-1-10, and Lots 22, FINAL ORDER and part of 24 further identified as Tax Map Parcels 97.08-1-1, 97.08-1-2 and 97.08-1-3) located ) on State Route 679 (Buck Mountain ) Road) adjacent to the Starkey ) Dragstrip, within the Cave Spring j ~ Magisterial District ~_ `O WHEREAS, your petitioner, T. D. Steele, did petition the v~ Board of County Supervisors to rezone the above-referenced P~ parcels of land from R-E District to B-2 District for the z purpose of constructing and operating a nursing home and 0 center; and and o physical therapy ~- v~ WHEREAS, after due legal notice, the Planning Commission Q did hold a public hearing on said request on June 2, 1987, at 0 ~- which time, all parties in interest were given an opportune y a to be heard; and WHEREAS, after due legal notice, the Board of County Supervisors did hold a public hearing on the petition on June 23.1987, at which time, all parties in interest were given an opportunity to be heard; and WHEREAS, after full consideration, the Board of County Supervisors determined that the rezoning be approved.. as proffered. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED that the following parcels of land be rezoned from R-E District to B-2 District: ` .i:.~' /'E' Roanoke County Tax Map No. Portion of 87.20-1-10 97.08-1-1 97.08-1-2 97.08-1-3 Deed Book/Page 1262-1080 1223-1958 1223-1958 1223-1958 The legal descriptions for said properties are as follows: Beginning at a point on the north side of Buck Mountain Road, Virginia secondary Route 679, which point is the southwest corner of a 29.52 acre tract conveyed to Lynn Brae Farms, Inc. by deed recorded in the Roanoke County Circuit Court Clerk's Office in Deed Book 906, page 629, thence leaving said road N24°-34'E 758' ± to a point, thence with a new line through the property of Lynn Brae Farms, Inc. S65°-26'E 676.0 + to corner #3 on the line of the Blue Ridge Parkway right-of-way thence with same the following courses and distances S27°-56'-30E 170.59', S61°-37'-10" W49.65', S73°-08'-30"W 119.69', S83°-36'-30"W 295.0', N86°-14'-30"W 99.84', thence leaving the Blue Ridge Parkway property and with north lines of Lots 23 and 22 as shown on the map of Thomas H. Beasley property N72°-28'-30"W 200.0 to common corner between Lots 21 and 22 of said "Beasley" property; thence with the line between lots 21 and 22 S17°-31'-30" 301.20' to a point on the north right-of-way line of Buck Mountain Road, Virginia secondary Route 679, thence with same the following two courses and distances N73°-15'-30"W a chord distance of 27.32'-arc distance 27.32' a radius of 542.96' thence N71°-49'W 148.91' to the place of beginning and containing 7.47 ac. more or less and being a part of the same property convdeed of Lynn Brae Farms, Inc. by Old Heritage Corp. by record in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, in Deed Book 908, page 629. Lots 22 and 23 and that portion of Lot 24 between Blue Ridge Parkway and Lot 23 on the north side of Secondary Route 679, as shown on Map recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County in State Highway Plat Book 8, page 65; and being the same property conveyed to Belva E. Hall bdeedgdated.July129nd Belva E. Hall, husband and wife, by 1985 of record in the Roanoke County Circuit Court Clerk's Office in Deed Book 1223, page 1958. BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED that a copy of this order be transmitted to the Secretary of the Planning Commission and 2 -~'~~ .: ~ ~._ that he be directed to reflect that change on the official zoning maps of Roanoke County. Adopted on motion of Supervisor Brittle upon the following recorded vote: AYES• Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens NAYS: ABSENT: Supervisor Johnson and .~/_Q.1~2.~./l , Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors CC: Development-Review Coordinator Real Estate Assessor Director of Planning 3 `~~-~ , .~_ VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY Re: Rezoning of four tracts of land (7.47 acre tract of land currently a part of Tax Map Parcel No. 87.20-1-10, and Lots 22, 23 and part of 24 further identified as Tax Map Parcels 97.08-1-1, 97.08-1-2 and 97.08-1-3) located ~ on State Route 679 (Buck Mountain ~ Road) adjacent to the Starkey ~ Dragstrip, within the Cave Spring Magisterial District PROFFER OF CONDITIONS TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY: F- L- ~ In accordance with ~ 15.1-491.1 et se of the Code of z 0 o Virginia and § 21-105E of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance, the Petitioner, T. D. Steele, hereby voluntarily proffers to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, 0 ~ Virginia the following conditions to the rezoning of the above-referenced parcel of land: 1. The uses on the property will be as follows: a. Nursing home; and b. Physical therapy center or related clinic/ hospital special care; and c. Commercial uses complementary to the principal uses, which commercial uses are more fully described in ~ 21-23-2(A)(2) of the Roanoke County Code. 2. The height of the structures on the property will not exceed 35 feet. 3. Surface water detention facilities will be established on site which will handle a ten-year storm with a two-year predevelopment release. 4. The developer does not intend to use Turkey Hollow Road to provide excess to the above-referenced property. Respectfully submitted, T. D. Steele of Counsel Robert E. Glenn Maryellen F. Goodlatte Glenn, Flippin, Feldmann & Darby P. ~. BOX 2887 Roanoke, Virginia 24001 Counsel for Petitioner 2 L E G A L N O T I C E Notice is hereby given to all interested persons that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at 7:00 p.m. on Tuesday, June 23, 1987, in the Community Room at the Roanoke County Administration Center, 3738 Br~ambleton Avenue, S.W., Roanoke, Virginia, on the petition of T. D. Steele, requesting rezoning from RE, Residential Estates to B-2 Business of a tract containing approximately 8:77 acres and located on the north side of Buck Mountain Road immediately west of the Blue Ridge Parkway in the Cave Spring Magisterial District. Rezoning has been requested to construct and operate a nursing home and a physical therapy center. The County Planning Commission recommends approval with proffered conditions. A copy of the Zoning Ordinance of Roanoke County and amendments thereto as well as a copy of the petition, site plan, and other documents related to this request may be examined in the office of the Department of Development, located in Room 600 at the Roanoke County Administration Center. Roanoke County will provide assistance to handicapped persons desiring to attend public hearings. Such individuals are requested to contact the County office of Personnel Services ([703] 772-2018) if special provisions are necessary for attendance. Given under my hand this 4th day of June, 1987. ~~ ~ Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Please publish in the evening edition of the Roanoke Times and World News on: Tuesday, June 9, 1987 Tuesday, June 16, 1987 Direct the bill for Publication to: Glenn, Flippen, Feldmann & Darby P. 0. Box 2887 Roanoke, Virginia 24001 VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY Re: Request for Rezoning by T.D. Steele for four tracts of land located on State Route 679 (Buck Mountain Road) adjacent to the Starkey Dragstrip, within the Cave Spring Magisterial District TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY: PETITION WE THE UNDERSIGNED Landowners of property located in Roanoke County, Virginia, on Turkey Hollow Road, Crossbow Circle Road, and property adjacent thereto, join in this PETITION to voice our concern that Turkey Hollow Road will be caused to become a public throughway to Buck Mountain Road as a result of the proposed redevelopment by T.D. Steele of a certain tract of land containing 8.77 acres located on Buck Mountain Road, which property lies in Roanoke County and is the subject of a request for rezoning by T.D. Steele for the purpose of constructing a nursing home and physical therapy center in conjunction with the development of a tract of land containing 29.52 acres owned by Lynn Brae Farms, Inc., which tract adjoins a partially completed road known as Turkey Hollow Road running from Crossbow Circle Road to a drags trip on certain property containing 36.67 acres, more or less, owned by Old Heritage Corporation, which property adjoins the 8.77 acre tract and the 29.52 acre tract aforesaid. In accordance with the foregoing, the undersigned Landowners hereby PETITION and request the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, to restrict the use of Turkey Hollow Road so as not to permit public access from and across Turkey Hollow Road to Buck Mountain Road. ~ ,.-,~ / P /~ ~--~ p-L ~~ f {---- ~~ ~ ~ /~ ,' "' - ~. ...--r-- ----~ _ // / r / / '. 1 ~ f' y , '-~,%' ~ ~ / ~: ~ I '~ -C~'j ",tom v r ~``-,w' ' ~,~ ± __. ~` ,y /~ t, 4 .., y+y ~ ""D ?/ / /wp/glrm/261.pet ,-- -~,. ``~- _ _ _, ~.~~ ~, ~:r'~ :~,C:: ~ `. ~ e I,~ ~r. ~ ~~ f / ,~ n ~ , ~ ~ ~, ~~`f ( / ~ L'V-lTZL ~" 1 ~ A P P E A R A N C E R E Q U E S T ~g/-f_~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PUBLIC HEARING ON ~~~~ ~ ~~~ f=T C ~ ~ ~~Z ~' ~t/f // ~ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so that I may comment. I agree to follow the guidelines listed below. WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. 1. Each speaker will have between three and five minutes available whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. 2. Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. 3. All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. 4. Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times . 5. Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. 6. INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. P L E A S E W R I T E L E G I B L Y - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NAME : L"7 E? .t_~ i7 d /v' - ~'1 ~I l L_ ~ _ ~~. ADDRESS : • ~ l ~' ~:'~ L~ ~~ h /~ N ~ ~~ ~~") ~ ~ 7j, ~ Ali PHONE : ~ ~ LI- " ! G~ j (~ ( ~fJf- /'/~a r PLEASE NOTE: (After filling out, give to the Deputy Clerk. Thank you.) ,.. A P P E A R A N C E R E Q U E S T PUBLIC HEARING ON I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so that I may comment. I agree to follow the guidelines listed below. WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. 1. Each speaker will have between three and five minutes available whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. 2. Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. 3. All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. 4. Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times . 5. Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. 6. INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. P L E A S E W R I T E L E G I B L Y - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - .~~ f~~~ae/ f ace J 1': NAME: ADDRESS : ~~it/~, G-OG.~' /~d,~~S ~ ,~/ 1>dl~~.. ,t1Tf7~~i' S- ~6 D ~/ h ~d ~ ~~a 2 ~ ' ~oa~2e9C.o , 1/,d 2~Ov S PHONE : ~~Z Sober ~~,/c~r~~. a- ~G~~/~-- a~ /grid ~rcys ~- ~u rk~ ~~~~'--- .~~~ -~- Goa ssd~ ~'~.-~~.. ,~~~ . PLEASE NOTE: (After filling out, give to the Deputy Clerk. Thank you.) A P P E A R A N C E R E Q U E S T - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PUBLIC HEARING ON ~ ~ ~ '- ., I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so that I may comment. I agree to follow the guidelines listed below. WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. 1. Each speaker will have between three and five minutes available whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. 2. Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. 3. All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. 4. Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times . 5. Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. 6. INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. P L E A S E W R I T E L E G I B L Y - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NAME : ~C/.~~5 k ~7 {' /l~fc~~'- ~ i /7~ ADDRESS : ~~F~~~ ~~-~> ~ 0 ~~ 7 ~z1~~- PHONE: 67rt'~,~ ~ 7`~~ ~.~'`~ PLEASE NOTE: (After filling out, give to the Deputy Clerk. Thank you.) A P P E A R A N C E R E Q U E S T - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PUBLIC HEARING ON ~ S, 3 I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so that I may comment. I agree to follow the guidelines listed below. WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. 1. Each speaker will have between three and five minutes available whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. 2. Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. 3. All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. 4. Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times . 5. Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. 6. INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. P L E A S E W R I T E L E G I B L Y - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NAME : ~ `-F L'i l ~ ~Y JatY t~~--~ A D D R E S S: ~~= `~ J C ~r ~.S S; +~,7'~Z~. ~{ jl~i C ~- ~~ PHONE : ~ .~ 1 "` `~ ~ (~` PLEASE NOTE: (After filling out, give to the Deputy Clerk. Thank you.) PETITIONER: SCOTT & SNYDER SERVICE BUREAU, INC. ~~~ !j'.., ~ CASE NIP'IBIIt: 21-6/87 Planning Cannission Hearing Date: June 2, 1987 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: June 23, 1987 1. REQUEST Petition of Scott and Snyder Service Bureau to rezone a 0.574 acre tract from A-1, Agricultural and M-l, Industrial to B-2, Business to construct a retail store providing canputer data processing, sales, and service located on the north side of Peters Creek Road approximately 60 feet east of Centurion Road in the Hollins Magisterial District. 2. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION No one in opposition was present at the Planning Commission Public Hearing. 3. SIGNIFICANT IMPACT FAC'IbRS a. Circulation: Peters Creek Road is congested. Access into the existing adjoining office facilities on the north side of Peters Creek Road as well as the petitioner's property is and will continue to be difficult because of the lack of left hand turn lanes and crossovers for northbound traffic. This condition will apply to any development that situates on this property. 4. PROFFERED CONDITIONS a. Use will be limited to any use permitted in office and residential district B-1 except residential; commercial uses serving the needs of a ccmmunity such as banks, retail drug stores, food sales, wearing apparel shops, home appliance sales and service, barber and beauty shops, offices, hotels, motels, theaters, assembly halls, coin-operated laundries and small dry cleaning and laundry establishments, new car dealerships which may include service facilities and used car lots, restaurants of a type which do not offer food or beverages for consumption outside the building provided that they are located within continuous shopping building canplexes or as part of the operation of a motel and personal and professional services; only merchandise intended to be sold at retail on the prgnises shall be stocked. b. Development will occur in substantial accord with the concept plan. 5. COMMISSIONER'S MCTION, VOTE AND REASON Mrs. Flippen moved to approve the petition with proffered conditions. The motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Eddy, Jones, Flippen, Witt, Winstead NAYS: None ABSENT: None 6. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE a. None. 7. ATI'ACHIKEI~TI'S Concept Plan (8~" x 11") ~ Vicinity Map (8~" x 11") ~ Staff Report Other: p~~~~ Robe t sta,U - er, Planning Coa~unission Secretary <~~ r~ STAFF REPORT CASE NUMBER: REVIEWED BY: 21-6/87 PETITIONER: SCOTT & SNYDER SERVICE ROB STALZER~S DATE: MAY 26, 1987 Petition of Scott and Snyder Service Bureau to rezone a 0.574 acre tract from A-1, Agricultural and M-l, Industrial to B-2, Business to construct a retail store providing computer data processing, sales, and service located on the north side of Peters Creek Road approximately 60 feet east of Centurion Road in the Hollins Magisterial District. 1. NATURE OF REQUEST a. Conditional request to build and operate a 4,000 sq.ft. office/ retail building that provides computer data processing sales and services. b. Attached concept plan and zoning vicinity map describe project more fully. 2. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS a. B-2 zoning with conditions will permit only those uses identified in Section 21-23-2 (a), paragraphs one and two. All other uses are excluded. b. Site plan review will be required to insure compliance with County regulations. c. Commercial entrance permit from the City of Roanoke will be required. 3. SITE CHARACTERISTICS a. Topography: Flat. b. Ground Cover: Cleared. 4. AREA CHARACTERISTICS a. Future Growth Priority: Situated within the Peters Creek community planning area. Designated as a high growth area, currently served by urban services. b. General area is developed with commercial and office uses. Directly adjacent to Route 117. Parcel is within proximity to both the airport and I-581. Dense residential duplex and single family development is in the area. 5. LAND USE IMPACT ASSESSMENT Rating: Rate each factor according to the impact of the proposed action. Use a scale of 1 through 5. 1 = positive impact, 2 = negligible impact, 3 = manageable impact, 4 = disruptive impact, 5 = severe impact, and N/A = not applicable. RATING FACTOR ~ COMMENTS ~~ ,--.~ ~; '.. ~~ LAND USE COMPATIBILITY 3 a. Comprehensive Plan: 1985 Comprehensive Development Plan has placed this area within a Transition land use category. Petitioner's request is consistent with the land use plan map and is partially consistent with the stated policies. An opportunity exists to downzone the current M-1 zoning which may now be used for more intensive industrial activities in an area intended for office or planned groupings of independent retail buildings. Petitioner's request conforms to design policies described within the Transition land use category but does not indicate shared access with adjacent vacant property or that proposed use will become a part of a future planned grouping of independent retail or office uses. 2 b. Surrounding Land: Parcel adjoins existing duplex development, existing office complex and VA Route 117. 2 c. Neighboring Area: Primarily mixed commercial and residential uses. 3 d. Site Layout: Petitioner has located parking to the rear of the building. Street frontage has been devoted to building architecture and landscaping. Building is prominent from street view. Single entrance is proposed to property. It would be desirable if this entrance could also be used for eventual development of adjacent vacant parcel on the north side of petitioner's property. Petitioner must, prior to site plan approval, adjust aisleway width from 20 feet to 24 feet to accommodate two-way traffic. This adjustment should not be a major problem. 3 e. Architecture: Not specified by either a proffer or letter of application. Petitioner has indicated verbally to staff that the front of the building would have a brick facade, the rear of the building would have metal siding. 2 f. Screening and Landscape: Per ordinance. 3 g. Amenities: Adequate parking. 2 h. Natural Features: No negative impact. TRAFFIC 2 i. Street Capacities: Petitioner's use would generate fewer than 100 ADT. Current ADT of Peters Creek Road is approximately 20,000. 4 j. Circulation: Peters Creek Road is congested. Access into the existing adjoining office facilities on the north side of Peters Creek Road as well as the petitioner's property is and will continue to be difficult because of the lack of left hand turn lanes and crossovers for northbound traffic. This condition will apply to any development that situates on this property. UTILITIES 2 k. Water: Adequate supply and distribution. 2 1. Sewer: Adequate treatment and transmission. DRAINAGE 3 m. Basin: N/A n. Floodplain: .~:,, r~! PUBLIC SERVICES 2 0. Fire Protection: Within established service standard. 2 p. Rescue: Within established service standard. N/A q. Parks and Recreation: N/A r. School: TAX BASE 1 s. - Land and Improvement Value: $200,000 - Taxable Gross Sales/Year: $750,000 - Total Employees: 8 - Total revenue to the County/Year: Approximately $18,550 ENVIRONMENT 2 t. Air: 2 u. Water: 2 v. Soils: 2 w. Noise: 3 x. Signage: Location and approximate size shown on submitted concept plan, however, not proffered. 6. PLAN CONSISTENCY This area is designated as Transition. The petitioner's request is consistent with the land use plan map and partially consistent with the stated policies. 7. STAFF EVALUATION a. Strengths: (1) Site layout conforms to the design policies stated within the Transition land use category and the 419 Frontage Development Plan. (2) Proposed use is consistent with the uses permitted in the Transition land use category and surrounding land use. (3) Adequate road capacity and community services. b. Weaknesses: (1> Circulation is hindered by the lack of a crossover or turn lanes for northbound traffic on Peters Creek Road. (2) Petitioner has not indicated whether eventual shared access is possible with adjacent vacant property to the north. (3} Proposed use is not within a cluster of independdent retail buildings, hence the importance of number 2 stated above. (4) Staff recommends that the concept plan be proffered to insure that design proposals are implemented. (5) Specific use not identified by proffer. R- - 2 - ~~ Q c--¢ - ~ ~ -~ ~~ -.~ -~, ~~ i _~ _~ f 1-i _~ ~. ~ To .~ cLN-ruR-IpN R- -1- '"~ ~ .., ,~~ ___ ~' -- I.~R-GEC E.~e. "'rR-E.ES. I __ _ ro SG R.F_~N FENGEr ~uFFER- Y~.~r~ -i o ~~. o F To -ra. Lr ----- St-1a.Ll. E. co. SHF-ubs rt -.1 - Pa.R-~~r-t ~ O -- coNc. wp.LK- i - --- -- -P~~.~+TiN~ SIGN -~iiZG.. E SET6~GIL To HLET R-0/.NoKL c~UNT''( ZONING ~ R44~fi •--- GRti~6v f•P-E.I- 30l R.hi'~. v vH s?v u~.. R-~ , i I 1 S . ~ •, ~ • -- - - - ------ ~ - • -- of ~~w '~'"'' GoNG~PT f L~.N Q ` `~ e to Lo 6o two ti GRp.PI-SIG SG/~LE~ - N~w Fa.~IL~-rY Foy. sc.o-r-rE S~Yr~E..R.._ S~ fz-V I G E. ~ t.J R- E a. L..I I t~J G , C / ~ c wooaaoz -pc 'J'hrwi ~,~ ~,~' `Q,, ~"'^.y,,,ti ~~~ G q" ~ ,,,~ _ ,- j-, ~ E ~y ~a,Ba~CRp~,~ ~c` ~ d} xir4zj..~ ~~1 ~~ ~,~~d p'O 8 °Laayrytl'~4 ~$~s i~ , 2 \ 1 rxn ~~. ~ ~ , B ii BRAIEH J0 f P~~ ~ . -. JR.~ti 5 ~~q~~G ~ o n~ ,~ ,,? ,_~ . ~ u~eiutrv Juno ~. ~ ~. ~ ~~ / P' 1 / i ~ ~ / / _ / / / / / / T / ~ S.OOAc / / / ro 29 / / / / °~ ~ (~ / i t~30 JJ / / ~ e e° / ~ . ~ 26 ~~~. iie R-Z ~. 2T. ~~ ~ ie~ a27~ !~ ~°a Jt1 c ,' G~ 13 / / / / r sa \ ' ~_I / / ~ ~'~ 32 OP'/ A_ s r b~ c7~ / g ~~ '~ 31 / 2.12 At la i .p r / ~ t ¢ / ~=v `~~ A -~ 4'a-z ' S 1.62 Ac P - t . M-! 9 5.13 Ac •- ~~ L ` Z ,~ CJ e ROANOKE COUNTY Scott & Snyder DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT A-1 & M-1 to R-2 s ~: r ..~ ,~ co M ~r P~ w 0 U O ~- N Q 0 a a VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY A .574- acre parcel of land, ) generally located :'TATF ROUTE 117 ) AND CP,DiTU RI ON ROAD ) within the fiOLLINS ) Magisterial District, and ) recorded as parcel # 37.03-1-2 ) in the Roanoke County Tax Records.) Page 1 of 2 FINAL ORDER TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY: WHEREAS, your Petitioner ~~nmm & SNYDER SERVI~_.t~ BUREAU I1dC. did petition the Board of County Supervisors to rezone the above- referenced parcel of land from ~,~~ District to ~~ District for the purpose of 'G'~m7~~T.T~:T-TrtC ~ ~'OMPUTER DATA PROC'E~~ING, SALES, & SERVIt'E BUSINESS WHEREAS, after due legal notice, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing of the petition on ~I„nP ~ 19 .~ at which time, all parties in interest were given an opportunity to be heard; and WHEREAS, after full consideration, the Board of County Supervisors determined that the rezoning be approved with proffered conditions on June 23, 1987 NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDERED that the aforementioned parcel of land, which is contained in the Roanoke County Tax Maps as Parcel 37.08-1-2 and recorded in Deed Book 1249,page 1066 and legally described below, be rezoned from M-1 Manufacturing A-1 Agricult~'tu~~~ict to B-2 Business District. ;~ ,r, Page 2 of 2 ~ ~ .... Legal Description of Property: " BEGIN?~ING at a point on the north side of new State Highway #7.17, 110 60 feet east of a concrete highway mon2iment; thence N. 33° 56' 30" h'. 247.32 feet to an iron pin; thence N. 55° 30' 10" E. 100.01 feet to an iron pin; thence S. 33° 56' 30" E. 248.29 feet to an iron pin; thence S. 56° 03' 30" W. 100 feet to the place of BEGINNING, and as shown by a plat made by David Dick and Harry A, Nall, S.C.E.'s, dated March 11, 1966; and BEING the same property conveyed to Douglas M. Gimbert, Debbra G. Bennett, Benjamin I. Gimbert, Jr. and Mark A. Gimbert by deed dated July 15, 1986, from Gimbert Associates, Inc., a Virginia Corporation, and recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, in Deed Book 1249, page 1066. BE IT FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this order be transmitted to the Secretary of the Planning Commission and that he be directed to reflect that change on the official zoning map of Roanoke County. ADOPTED on motion of Supervisor Nickens and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens NAYS: ABSENT: Supervisor Johnson ,~ _ Q~~.s-~ Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors CC: Real Estate Assessor Development Review Coordinator Director of Planning i t > w VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY A ,,74 acre parcel of land, ) generally located ST'~TL ROUTE 117 ) ATTD CET7TURI0r1 ROAD ) PROFFER OF within the HOLLIfJS CONDITIONS Magisterial District, and recorded as parcel # 37.0°-~-2 ) in the Roanoke County Tax Records. ) TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY: Being in accord with Sec. 15.1-491.1 et seq. of the Code of Virginia and Sec. 21-105E. of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance, the Petitioner ~`COT^ & STdYDER SERVICE i3UREAU INC. ~ hereby voluntarily proffers to the Board of Supervisors of ~ Roanoke County, Virginia the following conditions to the rezoning Q of the above-referenced parcel of land: ~`t. ANY USE PERMITTED IN OFFICE AND RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT B-1 EXCEPT 1' RESIDENTIAL. COMMERCIAL USES SERVING TT:E NEEDS OF A COT~IMUTIITY, SUCIs AS BATdTiS, RET- AIL DRUG STORES, FOOD SALES, G?EARIIVG APPAREL SLOPS, DOME APPLIA?`TCE SALES ALdD SERVICE, BARBER AIJD BEAUTY SfiOPS, OFFICES, T?OTELS, MOTELS, TT~EATERS , ASSEMBLY I?ALL° , COIN-OPERATED LATJTv'DRIES AND SP'TALL DRY CLEAT7ING AND LAUNDP.Y ESTABLISI'P~'IErTTS, NEV' CAR DEALERSI.IPS G'I'ICTT T".AY INCLUDE SERVICE FACLITIES AVID USED CP.R LOTG , RE;'TAUR,~T3TS OF A `T'YPF V'ITICTT DO I`dOT OFFER FOOD OR BEVFRAGEG FOR CON~'UMPTION OUTcIDE TI'E BUIT,DITdG: PROVIDED, TF'AT TT"EY ARE LOCATED F'IT~'IN CONTITdL-OLTS ST'OPpIr?G BUILDING COr"PLEXE,=' CR AS PART OF T??E OPERATION OF A Td.OTEL AND PT'R~OTdAI~ AND PROFE;?SIOPI~L SERVICEc , ONLY MERCT"ANDISE II`dTE1`dDF11 TO BE SOLD AT RETAIL ON T?'E PP.EMISEr CF-'ALL I'E cTOC?CED. 2. CEVELOP'~iE?JT UlILL OCCUR IPJ SUBSTA"JTIAL ACCORD 'dITH THE COidCEPT PLAN. tfull -bmitte , ~~, ~ , over ~. VIRGINIA: Page 1 of 2 BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY A .574 acre parcel of land, ) generally located ST?'iTE ROUTE 117 ) AP~1D CENTURION ROAD ) within the HOLLINS ) RECOMMENDATION Magisterial District, and ) recorded as parcel # 37.03-1-2 ) in the Roanoke County Tax Records.) TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY: WHEREAS, your Petitioner SCOTT & SP•1YDEF. SERVICE BUREAL' INC. has filed with the Secretary to the Planning Commission a petition to rezone the above-referenced parcel of land from P•Il District to B2 District for the purpose of COMPUTER DATA PRnC'T,S~Ti~C;r ~T,T,~.c;' f,, ~'T?R~TTC'F Ri.'TATT T2iiCT~.T1~'CC WHEREAS, the petition was referred to the Planning Commission wY,ich, after due legal notice as required by Section 15.1-431 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended, did hold a public hearing on June 2 19 gZ; and WHEREAS, at that public hearing all parties in interest were afforded an opportunity to be heard; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due consideration has recommended to the Board of County Supervisors that the rezoning be approved with proffered conditions 4 -., - Page 2 of 2 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission recommends to the Board of County Supervisors that the above- referenced parcel of land be rezoned to B-2, Business with proffered conditions District. The above action was adopted on motion of Carolyn Fli~nen , -ori=second-Ty -------------------------------------- and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Eddy, Jones, Flippen, Mitt, !'!instead NAYS : FJone ABSENT: None Respectfully submitted, ~Q Secretar Roanoke County Planning Commission VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY A ,57a acre parcel of land, ) generally located ~mATI~; ROtiTE ) Page 1 of 2 1 1 7 '~ ;D CF TTi1RTOTd RnAD ) within the H(1LLTNS ) PETITION Magisterial District, and ) recorded as parcel # ~7.(~R-1-2 ) in the Roanoke County Tax Records.) TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY: WHEREAS, your Petitioner ~,~nT,T ~, ~r,Ty~r~ ~rR~TTCT<' ~T'~R'F:~TT TT, TI' respectfully files this petition pursuant to Section 21-105 of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance and in accordance with the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended, and would respectfully show the following: 1) The Petitioner is the owner of the above-referenced parcel of land. 2) The property is presently zoned under the provisions of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance as Mi and A-1 District. 3 ) The property is designated TZ?AN`'ITIOrI in the Future Land Use Guide of the Roanoke County Comprehensive Development Plan. 4) Your Petitioner now desires to have this property rezoned as B2 BUSIA3Ea~ District for the purpose of COMPUTER DATA PROC,SSING, SALE, & SERVICE Page 2 of 2 WHEREFORE, your Petitioner respectfully requests that the Zoning Ordinance of Roanoke County be amended and that the above-referenced parcel of land be rezoned as set out in number 4. FURTHER, your Petitioner requests that this petition be referred by the Secretary to the Roanoke County Planning Commission for its consideration and recommendation. Respectfully submitted, PETITIONER: SOUTHEASTERN OPIZCAL, INC. ~'"' ~ ~'-' CASE NtI~IBER: 25-6/87 Planning Commission Hearing Date: June 2, 1987 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: June 23, 1987 1. RD~LTEST Petition of Southeastern Optical, Inc. to rezone a 0.73 acre tract fran B-l, Business to M-1, Industrial to assemble eyeglasses located at 4607 Old Cave Spring Road in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District. 2. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION There were two present in opposition at the Planning Ccmnnission Public Hearing who voiced the following concerns: increased traffic, decreased property value and further erosion of the bank behind the subject property. 3. SIGNIFICANT IMPACT FACTORS a. Comprehensive Plan: 1985 Comprehensive Development Plan has placed this area within a Transition land use category. The petitioner's request is not consistent with the land use plan map and most of the stated policies. The business has occupied the building for seven years with no complaints from surrounding landowners and with very little impact on the neighboring area. Although classified as a light manufacturing use, petitioner's operation has an equal or less impact on surrounding properties as a typical commercial or office use found on Route 1663. Petitioner's concept plan indicates that policies TR-7, TR-8 and TR-9 will be followed. Concept plan has not been proffered. 4. PROFFERED CONDITIONS a. The property will be used only for the manufacture of optical products and related support operations. b. No substantial changes will be made in the existing signage on the property. c. The conceptual plan submitted with this application is proffered insofar as it shows the entrance drive and parking area and insofar as it exhibits screening and buffering along the north and east sides of the property. 5. CONIl~IISSIONER'S MOTION, VOTE AND REASON Mr. Eddy moved to approve the petition with proffered conditions. The motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Eddy, Jones, Flippen, Winstead NAYS : Witt ABSENT: None 6. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE a. Mr. Witt stated that he was disappointed that the landscaping adjacent to the road right-of-way is to be omitted. 7. ATTACfIl~NTS ,/ Concept Plan (8~" x 11") Vicinity Map (8~" x 11") ,/ Staff Report Other : .~~ Robert S lzer, Planning C~anission Secretary STAFF REPORT r / . ~,_ CASE NUMBER: 25-6/87 PETITIONER: SOUTHEASTERN OPTICAL, INC. REVIEWED BY: ROB STALZER~s DATE: MAY 26, 1987 Petition of Southeastern Optical, Inc. to rezone a 0.73 acre tract from B-1, Business to M-1, Industrial to assemble eyeglasses located at 4607 Old Cave Spring Road in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District. 1. NATURE OF REQUEST a. Conditional request to rezone a legal nonconforming light industrial use so that a proposed addition of 1,000 sq.ft. of floor area may be added to the existing one story block building consisting of 3,000 sq.ft. of floor area. Petitioner has occupied the building since 1980. The previous use of the building was a butcher shop and meat market. It was determined in 1980 that, in accordance with the provisions of the zoning ordinance, the petitioner's use was of equal or lesser intensity than the previous use. b. Attached concept plan and zoning vicinity map describe project more fully. 2. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS a. M-1 permits a wide variety of light industrial and manufacting uses. Petitioner has proffered that the property will only be used for the manufacture of optical products and related support activities. b. VDOT commercial entrance permit required. c. Site plan review required to insure compliance with County regulations. 3. SITE CHARACTERISTICS a. Topography: Flat. b. Ground Cover: Cleared with existing building with unpaved parking at the rear of the property. 4. AREA CHARACTERISTICS a. Future Growth Priority: Situated within the Windsor Hills community planning area. Designated as a stable growth area, currently served by urban services. b. General area is developed with mixed commercial, office and residential uses within 200 yards of US Route 221, a major primary highway. 5. LAND USE IMPACT ASSESSMENT Rating: Rate each factor according to the impact of the proposed action. Use a scale of 1 through 5. 1 = positive impact, 2 = negligible impact, 3 = manageable impact, 4 = disruptive impact, 5 = severe impact, and N/A = not applicable. RATING FACTOR COMMENTS ~"' ~:~ f ~ ^°'ti..~ LAND USE COMPATIBILITY 4 a. Comprehensive Plan: 1985 Comprehensive Development Plan has placed this area within a Transition land use category. The petitioner's request is not consistent with the land use plan map and most of the stated policies. The business has occupied the building for seven years with no complaints from surrounding landowners and with very little impact on the neighboring area. Although classified as a light manufacturing use, petitioner's operation has an equal or less impact on surrounding properties as a typical commercial or office use found on Route 1663. Petitioner's concept plan indicates that policies TR-7, TR-8 and TR-9 will be followed. Concept plan has not been proffered. 2 b. Surrounding Land: Operation has had and will continue to have minimal impact on immediate surrounding properties all of which are zoned B-1 with the exception of approximately 50 feet of R-1 to the west 2 c. Neighboring Area: Densely developed mixed commercial, office and residential. 2 d. Site Layout: Concept plan indicates that parking will be to the rear of the property, building facade will be prominent from street view, existing pavement in the front of the building will be removed and landscaping will be installed, entrance will be relocated and redefined according to VDOT specifications. 3 e. Architecture: Existing block building will be expanded. 2 f. Screening and Landscape: As per ordinance. 3 g. Amenities: Adequate parking indicated based on floor area; however, petitioner's business employs 35 people and only 27 parking spaces are indicated. 2 h. Natural Features: No significant impact. TRAFFIC 3 i. Street Capacities: Current ADT on Route 1663 is approximately 1,800 vehicles. Petitioner's business generates less than 100 ADT. UPS and Federal Express make deliveries once a day. A large freight delivery of paper and other materials is made once a month. 3 j. Circulation: Immediate access to US 221 which is scheduled for improvement. UTILITIES 2 k. Water: Adequate source and distribution. 2 1. Sewer: Adequate treatment and transmission. ,,s:; ~~ DRAINAGE 2 m, Basin: N/A n. Floodplain: PUBLIC SERVICES 2 0. Fire Protection: Within established service standard. 2 p, Rescue: Within established service standard. N/A q. Parks and Recreation: N/A r. School: TAX BASE 1 s. - Land and Improvement Value: $77,700 - Taxable Gross Sales/Year: $1.3 million - Total Employees: 35 - Total revenue to the County/Year: Approximately $21,000 (generated from total operation not just expansion). ENVIRONMENT 2 t. Air: 2 u. Water: 2 v. Soils: 2 w. Noise: 2 x. Signage: Proffer submitted stating that existing sign which is painted on the front of the building and is unobtrusive will remain. 6. PLAN CONSISTENCY This area is designated as Transition. The petitioner's request is not consistent with the land use plan map or most of the defined policies. Proposal is consistent with policies TR-7, TR-8 and TR-9 as indicated on the concept plan. 7. STAFF EVALUATION a. Strengths: (1) Legal nonconforming use in existing building. The use has little or no impact on surrounding properties and has equal or less effect than a typical commercial or office use in the same area. (2) Proffer cites specific use to be conducted in the building. (3) Proffer specifies signage. (4) Concept plan indicates adherence to design policies contained within Transition land use category. b. Weaknesses: (1) Concept plan not proffered. (2) Manufacturing operation is not an encouraged use within the Transition land use category. ~~ c 1 ~ SITE r ~ J ~ 3~ 4r v ..,> _~ .3_3 7~ . 20 ,•tr i9 -rA~- N~NCID R-1 TAX ~ Z•~NEp 'R,• ~~ I -~ • 07 ZI~~ W N•9 139~03~ tt ~_ o ~' V ~~ ~0 Z 0 ,~ N 3 ~~ ~~ n M z "~/ ~ n ~o . a r= ? ~ ~~ ~~ J ~~ 1 ~ v ~Y~ k 1!/ ~,~0 .3`,~ ; s. / Z ~ '`~ Sa~ Vp0 ENT R4~ C CIST ~/Y N fr) I 4 MIXED HEA VEGETATION 0.733 ,[>G2.ES r--- ~ aPPrzox. LOCATIOAI ~ EX15TIn16 ~I.DG. L___ f4 m N P~OPpSE ~ M ., p /' P4rt,KI~~ w ~ m f ~, ~ ~ n D ~ N ~ W l3 ~ 0 ` ~ N Opp ~ N N ~` '1C.0 -~ ~3. ~ h' 29. Z' •' ~ E1C/gTl ~r. ~` Nf~ ~ `~ i `'TOE ~ ~ BC.oC k o .C F 0~ br ~ m BUJLDr~ Q t-~ ~ * 3~0 S. F I4.~' ~ . t7o' o ~~~ .•..: T` ww~K. f 14.i' 9 , -.~ >r ~ 0 ~t41gTIN~ PA S 60 3~ ~~MC ~ _~ MO . W. ;: ~'sE pE ` ~~C.A~P \J S- SMA 3 _ ` 1 lv.70' ~/ LL °~rouo~ O rRE~s ~ CA~/E SPRiN~ v°r'r srv ~G_~ _ ~ tZN OPTICA(.. Cob ~T, ROq p 5 W oR EWUgL ~PICINGf tzp. Sw/. ZZ1 VIICGrN1A EXISTII.JG ZONING : B• i :f T UA-l . .. REQUESTED ZONING: M-1 s o' zo' o' 2 s' so' I'• so' GRAPHIC SCALE ~~ \ RO~O ~t 419 'A ~ -~~~"'.. ti _ 1 n~~"`.~~j~~"' K •~ .•~ .. dy ~~M~ w ~, 41~ ~ ~_ ~ '~,~ 1 kK 1 t~('-'~f~A~tJUCE _ ~ ~ Y I~f~,~ `•.I j ~ ~{ ~' \GR ~M[l.t.Nio~pn~~ \ C ff! ~• tip, ~r~ ~ ~ : • 4 ~y, ,~Tr`y p ,I ~'~A~ ~~~ ,~ EtON HILL J ~AMiE1l H .~; ~ ? Momv~ ~ 1p` ) ~ ~ .moss ~ ' XYroa a • ~~ ~ ~'~~~ ~~ ~YF ~~~~~ ~ 1 n F RD -l_..a""`~,GwI67~BUR~~ r~/ 613 B:% . / ./ ~~ ,r`%~`~ ~ .t. VICINITY MAD ~~ ~~ I nvn ~ ~~ 16AC 101 iIACICI s 4 ~-1 3 4.26 Ac I / w ~ ~ 14 6 R'~ • ~ v . \ 6 ~ ~ 2.OO,t~ ~ I 124 Ae - \ ~/ I Iq \y 1` `~c°' ~ ~\ M ~ 5 1 z~ Q-3 Q 1.73Ac s v o p ' / " R LOIAc I , ~ 13 ~ , ~ / $ - Z -zD f3- z~ R-Z~ ~J ~~ _ Q_~ ~ ti~ 3 " ~a I - '~° f3 ' ~ a 12 o~ ~_ 4 a° ~~ ti I _ ~~, 5 _ / Y 4 4.14 Ac o / _ / X96 ~ ~ S~ ~ ~ -' 3 Z o_ ~ 5 AN ~ c e ROANOKE COUNTY Southeastern Optical , Inc. DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT B-1 to M-1 VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY A .733 acre parcel of land, ) generally located at 4607 Cave ) Spring Road, SW, Roanoke, Virginia ) RECOMMENDATION within the Windsor Hills ) Magisterial District and ) recorded as parcel #76.20-3-1 ) in the Roanoke County Tax Records ) TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY: WHEREAS, your Petitioner, T & B Realty has filed with the Secretary to the Planning Commission a petition to rezone the above-referenced parcel of land from B-1 District to M-1 District for the purpose of the manufacture of optical products. WHEREAS, the petition was referred to the Planning Commission which, after due legal notice as required by Section 15.1-431 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended, did hold a public hearing on June 2, 1987; and WHEREAS, at that public hearing all parties in interest were afforded an opportunity to be heard; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due consideration has recommended to the Board of County Supervisors that the rezoning be approved with proffered BOUNDS AND DORSEY, P.C. C011d1t10i1S. ATTORNEYS AT LAW SUITE 710 DOMINION BANK BUILDING ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 2ao11 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission recommends to the Board of County Supervisors that the above-referenced parcel of land be rezoned to M-l, Industrial with proffered conditions District. The above action was adopted on motion of ~ oo R ~,~,~„ an-~ecorrd """""""""""; and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Eddy, Jones, Flippen, Winstead NAYS : L~li tt ABSENT: None Respectfully submitted, ~~ Secretary Roanoke County Planning Commission BOUNDS AND DORSEY, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW SUITE 710 DOMINION BANK BUILDING ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24011 J BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY A .733 acre parcel of land, ) generally located at 4607 Cave ) Spring Road, SW, Roanoke, Virginia ) PETITION within the Windsor Hills ) Magisterial District and ) recorded as parcel #76.20-3-1 ) in the Roanoke County Tax Records ) TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY: WHEREAS, your petitioner, T & B Realty, Inc. respectfully files this petition pursuant to Section 21-105 of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance and in accordance with the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended, and would respectfully show the following: 1) The Petitioner is the owner of the above- referenced parcel of land. 2) The property is presently zoned under the provisions of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance as a B-1 District. 3) The property is designated Transition in the Future Land Use Guide of the Roanoke County Comprehensive Development Plan. 4) Your Petitioner now desires to have this property rezoned as an M-1 District for the purpose of BOUNDS Ago DORSEY, P.c. the manufacture of optical products and related support ATTORNEYS AT LAW SUITE 710 DOMINION BANK BUILDING ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24011 operations ~.. WHEREFORE, your Petitioner respectfully requests that the Zoning Ordinance of Roanoke County be amended and that the above-referenced parcel of land be rezoned as set out in number 4. FURTHER, your Petitioner requests that this petition be referred by the Secretary to the Roanoke County Planning Commission for its consideration and recommendation. Respectfully submitted, William H. Lindsey, At rney for T & B Realty BOUNDS AND DORSEY, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW SUITE 710 DOMINION BANK BUILDING ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24071 LBGAL NO'T'ICE OF A RDGiJLAR MEETING OF THE ROANOKE COiJN`T'Y BQARD OF SUPERVISORS Notice is hereby given to all interested persons that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at 7:00 P.M. on Tuesday, June 23, 1987, at the Roanoke County Administration Center, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, SW, in Roanoke, Virginia to hear the following requests: 1. Petition of Richfield Retirement Canmunity for a Special Exception Permit to operate a hone for adults on a 0.6 acre tract located on the north side of Route 11 immediately west of its intersection with Route 642 in the Catawba Magisterial District. All plans and ordinances are available for inspection in the Department of Development, Room 600, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, Roanoke, Virginia. Roanoke County will provide assistance to handicapped persons desiring to attend public hearings. Such individuals are requested to contact the County off ice of Personnel Services 703/772-2018 if special provisions are needed for attendance. Given under my hand this 5th day of June, 1987. YYl Govt-c-,i~-~ ~. Mary Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Please publish: Evening Edition Roanoke Times & World-News June 9, 1987 June 16, 1987 Please bill: County of Roanoke Department of Planning & Zoning P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY A .733 acre parcel of land, ) generally located at 4607 Cave ) Spring Road, SW, Roanoke, Virginia ) within the Windsor Hills ) FINAL ORDER ~ Magisterial District and ) ~ recorded as parcel #76.20-3-1 ) in the Roanoke County Tax Records ) ~ ~ TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY: z WHEREAS, your Petitioner, T & B Realty, did ,,, ° petition the Board of County Supervisors to rezone the 0 ~" above-referenced parcel of land from B-1 District to M- N Q 0 1 District for the purpose of the manufacture of w ~ optical products and related support operations; a. WHEREAS, after due legal notice, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing of the petition on June 2, 1987, at which time all parties in interest were given an opportunity to be heard; and WHEREAS, after full consideration, the Board of County Supervisors determined that the rezoning be approved with Proffer of Conditions on June 23, 1987 NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDERED that the aforementioned parcel of land, which is contained in BOUNDS AND DORSEY, P.C. the Roanoke County Tax Maps as Parcel 76.20-3-1 and ATTORNEYS AT LAW SUITE 710 DOMINION BANK BUILDING ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24071 recorded in Deed Book 1214 , page 14 5 5 , and legally ."~~ described below, be rezoned from B-1 District to M-1 District. BEGINNING at a point on the westerly side of Old Cave Spring Road formerly Route 221, S. 73 deg. 15' W. 7.82 ft. from an old iron pin corner to the property of David M. Garst; thence N. 73 deg. 15' W. 173.37 feet passing the old iron pin at 7.82 ft. to an old pipe in concrete; thence N. 9 deg. 07' 21" W. 139.03 feet to an old iron pin; thence S. 89 deg. 56' E. 218.78 feet to an old pipe thence S. 6 deg. 30' W. 136.70 feet; thence S. 16 deg. 36' W. 53.39 feet to the Place of Beginning, containing 0.733 acre, according to plat of survey by Jack G. Bess, C.L.S., dated July 2, 1984. BE IT FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this order be transmitted to the Secretary of the Planning Commission and that he be directed to reflect that change on the official zoning map of Roanoke County. ADOPTED on motion of Supervisor Garrett and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens NAYS: ABSENT: Supervisor Johnson Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors CC: Real Estate Assessor Development Review Coordinator BOUNDS AND Doassv, P.C. Department of Planning ATTORNEYS AT LAW SUITE 710 DOMINION BANK BUILDING ROANOKE, VIRGINIA zaoii VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY A .733 acre parcel of land, ) generally located at 4607 Cave ) Spring Road, SW, Roanoke, Virginia ) AMENDED within the Windsor Hills ) PROFFER Magisterial District and ) OF ,~ recorded as parcel #76.20-3-1 ) CONDITIONS ~ in the Roanoke County Tax Records ) ~ TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY: Being in accord with Sec. 15.1-491.1 et seq. of the z ~ Code of Virginia and Sec. 21-105E. of the Roanoke County z 0 Zoning Ordinance, the Petitioner, T & B Realty hereby 0 ~- voluntarily proffers to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke ° County, Virginia the following conditions to the rezoning of 0 a the above-referenced parcel of land: a. Q 1) The property will be used only for the manufacture of optical products and related support operations. 2) No substantial changes will be made in the existing signage on the property. 3) The conceptual plan submitted with this application is proffered insofar as it shows the entrance drive and parking area and insofar as it exhibits screening and buffering along the north and east sides of this property. Respectfully submitted, BOUNDS AND DORSEY, P.C. ~~' /~ ATTORNEYS AT LAW SUITE 710 DOMINION BANK BUILDING ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24011 William H. Lindsey, A t~rney for T & B Realty L E G A L N O T I C E Notice is hereby given to all interested persons that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at 7:00 p.m, on Tuesday, June 23, 1987, in the Community Room at the Roanoke County Administration Center, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, S.W., Roanoke, Virginia, on the petition of T & B Realty for Southeastern Optical, Inc., requesting rezoning from B-1 Business to M-1 Industrial of a tract: containing 0.73 acre and located 4607 Old Cave Spring Road in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District. Rezoning has been requested to assemble eye glasses. The County Planning Commission recommends approval with proffered conditions. A copy of the Zoning Ordinance of Roanoke County and amendments thereto as well as a copy of the petition, site plan, and other documents related to this request may be examined in the office of the Department of Development, located in Room 600 at the Roanoke County Administration Center. Roanoke County will provide assistance to handicapped persons desiring to attend public hearings. Such individuals are requested to contact the County office of Personnel Services ([7031 772-2018) if special provisions are necessary for attendance. Given under my hand this Third day of June, 1987. ~_ C[ Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Please publish in the evening edition of the Roanoke Times and World News on: Tuesday, June 9, 1987 Tuesday, June 16, 1987 Direct the bill for Publication to: William Lindsey Suite 710, Dominion Bank Building Roanoke, Virginia 24011 A P P E A R A N C E R E Q U E S T - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Y _ ~~ PUBLIC HEARING ON Cam? ~~ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so that I may comment. I agree to follow the guidelines listed below. WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. 1. Each speaker will have between three and five minutes available whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. 2. Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. 3. All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. 4. Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times . 5. Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. 6. INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. P L E A S E W R I T E L E G I B L Y - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NAME : 'U • ,Y 1 ~/J ADDRESS : ~ / ~/ '~ ~5 . J ,T-- /~ ~ ,~T l~~ ~~ i ~~~ PHONE : ~/ ! ~ ~~ / PLEASE NOTE: (After filling out, give to the Deputy Clerk. Thank you.) ~' ~ ~ C~'? PETITIONER: R. WILLIAM REID BUILDERS CASE N[~1BER: 19-6/87 Planning Commission Hearing Date: June 2, 1987 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: June 23, 1987 1. REQUEST Petition of R. William Reid Builders to rezone a 0.25 acre tract from B-1, Business to B-2, Business to operate an office and a school of the arts located at 4530 Old Cave Spring Road in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District. 2. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION A concerned citizen questioned parking space availability to insure there would be no overflow parking on her property which is across the street. 3. SIGNIFICANT IMPACT FACTORS a. None. 4. PROFFERED CONDITIONS a. Use of the land will be restricted to § 21-23-2, paragraph A, subsections 1 through 4 of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance. b. No billboards will be erected on the property. 5. COMMISSIONER'S MOTION, VOTE AND REASON Mr. Eddy moved to approve the petition with proffered conditions. The motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Eddy, Jones, Flippen, Witt, Winstead NAYS: None ABSENT: None 6. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE a. None. 7. ATTACHMENTS Concept Plan (8~" x 11") Vicinity Map (8~" x 11") Staff Report Other: Robert S lzer, Planning Commission Secretary 5'1'Ar'r' xr;PUx'1' < ~_ ,r. CASE NUMBER: 19-6/87 PETITIONER: R. WILLIAM REID BUILDERS REVIEWED BY: ROB STALZER ~5 DATE: MAY 26, 1987 Petition of R. William Reid Builders to rezone a 0.25 acre tract from B-1, Business to B-2, Business to operate an office and a school of the arts located at 4530 Old Cave Spring Road in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District. 1. NATURE OF REQUEST a. Conditional request to lease upstairs floor space in an existing office building for the operation of a performing/creative arts studio. Lower floor is currently occupied by the petitioner's general contracting business. b. Attached concept plan and zoning vicinity map describe the project more fully. 2. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS a. Conditioned B-2 zoning classification limited to those uses specified by 21-23-2 (a), paragraphs one through four.Specific use not limited by proffer. b. VDOT entrance permit required for expanded use. c. Site plan review not required. Proposed use will occupy present building which will not be changed. 3. SITE CHARACTERISTICS a. Topography: Flat, cleared with existing structure and parking. b. Ground Cover: Cleared. 4. AREA CHARACTERISTICS a. Future Growth Priority: Situated within the Windsor Hills community planning area; designated as a stable growth area intended for commercial and residential infill. Urban services currently provided. b. General area is densely developed with existing mixed commercial and office uses. 5. LAND USE IMPACT ASSESSMENT Rating: Rate each factor according to the impact of the proposed action. Use a scale of 1 through 5. 1 = positive impact, 2 = negligible impact, 3 = manageable impact, 4 = disruptive impact, 5 = severe impact, and N/A = not applicable. RATING FACTOR COMMENTS LAND USE COMPATIBILITY 2 a. Comprehensive Plan: 1985 Comprehensive Development Plan has placed this area within a Core land use category. ~hproposed use is consistent with both the land use plan map and the stated policies. 2 b. Surrounding Land: Existing commercial and office uses are predominant. Auto body repair facility is directly across the street. 3 c. Neighboring Area: Mixed commercial, institutional, office and lower density residential. 2 d. Site Layout: No change from existing. 2 e. Architecture: No change from existing two-story office structure. 2 .2 2 f. Screening and Landscape: As per ordinance. g. Amenities: Adequate parking already on site. h. Natural Features: No negative effects. TRAFFIC Street Capacities: Proposed use will generate less than 100 vehicle trip ends per day. Current ADT of Route 1663 is approximately 1,800 vehicles. Circulation: Single entrance to be used by existing office, proposed use and existing nonconforming two-story single family home owned and rented by petitioner. 3 i. 2 j. UTILITIES 2 k. Water: Adequate source, adequate distribution. 2 1. Sewer: Adequate treatment, adequate transmission. DRAINAGE 2 m. Basin: N/A n. Floodplain: PUBLIC SERVICES 2 0. Fire Protection: Within established service boundaries. 2 p. Rescue: Within established service boundaries. N/A q. Parks and Recreation: N/A r. School: TAX BASE 1 s. - Land and Improvement Value: No additional. - Taxable Gross Sales/Year: $50,000 - Total Employees: 6 part time. - Total revenue to the County/Year: Approximately $500 in sales tax revenue. 2 t. 2 u. 2 v. 2 w. 2 6. ENVIRONMENT Air: Water: Soils: Noise: x. Signage: Has proffered that no billboards will be placed on the property. PLAN CONSISTENCY This area is designated as Core. Petitioner's request is both consistent with the land use plan map and stated policies. 7. STAFF EVALUATION a. Strengths: (1) Consistent with land use plan map and policies. (2) Minimal impact on surrounding land uses, adjacent roadways and existing community services. , b. Weaknesses: Specific use not proffered. ~o h ~ h h ' ~ , _ o ~ ~ ~ ,, ''• W a ~ v h I AJ J J ~ ~I :~ ~ ~ ~ U~ k. .~ ~~ ~ o ~.' ~ ~' ~ I~ ~ \ ~ ~~ '~ ~ ~ O h o N I ,O r N tia •- O ~. a z ~W ~ ' ` a•vzr ~ `j ~ J iri_ (/'~ ~ Q W ~ ,W~ '' O 0; V ~ aM'+ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ , 1 ~O 0 0 h h N ~o ~ V V Q ~ a H ~ Z ~ ~ (~ pQ c~G Z Q C~QC.7 ~ J z ,~ c.>: '-' ~ x o ~ j x ~F> ~ m ~ w~F ~ ~ V ~ Z Q 9 Z UF O V ~ °~c 'V ~ ~ ~ S ` N ... Z ~ ~ h~ ~ O ~~x W J ~ 3 3 ~ N Q ~ Om ~a Q O ~~ l o ,~ ~ r~ ~~ 1/3.04 .~ •~.~ ,p'S.IO ~-- S 8l o~ ~ W ~ 26.1 r o ~- T ham. N ~~" N V •O N 1, 1 T 1 J O ,^ ~ 7`!. 3 ; ~ ` m A - V / ~ ~ W C ~ ~J ``` ~ ,~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ' - - - ~ ~ ~ 217.87' 1`N r 279 65' (TOTAL) tii o W ~z~ C, WO °_-"f h J- ~~e r~ I m~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o W ~.. . ..- D un~Tu ~M1' ~ t L ~- ~ ROANOKE COUNTY d~: DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT ~l to R. ;~illiam Reid Builders B-1 to Q-2 VICINITY MAP ;; L E G A L N O T I C E Notice is hereby given to all interested persons that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at 7:00 p.m. on Tuesday, June 23, 1987, in the Community Room at the Roanoke County Administration Center, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, S.W., Roanoke, Virginia, on the petition of R. William Reid Builders, Inc., requesting rezoning from B-1 Business to B-2 Business of a tract containing 0.25 acre and located at 4530 Old Cave Spring Road in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District. Rezoning has been requested to operate an office and a school for the arts. The County Planning Commission recommends approval with proffered conditions. A copy of the Zoning Ordinance of Roanoke County and amendments thereto as well as a copy of the petition, site plan, and other documents related to this request may be examined in the office of the Department of Development, located in Room 600 at the Roanoke County Administration Center. Roanoke County will provide assistance to handicapped persons desiring to attend public hearings. Such individuals are requested to contact the County office of Personnel Services ([703] 772-2018) if special provisions are necessary for attendance. Given under my hand this 4th day of June, 1987. Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Please publish in the evening edition of the Roanoke Times and World News on: Tuesday, June 9, 1987 Tuesday, June 16, 1987 Direct the bill for Publication to: R. William Reid Builders, Inc. 4530 Old Cave Spring Road Roanoke, Virginia 24018 y VIRGINIA: Page 1 of 2 BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY A ~ acre parcel of land, ) generally locatedl.a,~~ ~ ~« ) r -{ ' within the (~~ ~~;~~~~~~~~~_ ~~,~ ;_~; ) PETITION Magisterial District, and ) recorded as parcel # -74„Zo_Z,- T ) Z-b ; Z-io in the Roanoke County Tax Records.) TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY: WHEREAS, your Petitioner ~ _ ~,,.,~~ ~j~(` ~ ~~ )-~ ~:;~t ~~ ~;_ .~.-w~ respectfully files this petition pursuant to Section 21-105 of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance and in accordance with the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended, and would respectfully show the following: 1) The Petitioner is the owner of the above-referenced parcel of land. 2) The proper!~y is presently zoned under the provisions of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance as ~ - 1 District. 3) The property is designated ~ ~;~-~ in the Future Land Use Guide of the Roanoke County Comprehensive Development Plan. 4) Your Petitioner now desires to have this property rezoned as 1 ~, '° i District for the purpose of ~ /~ ~7 v ~.C' I,•til,~ f'~ IUD cT ~ ~ti Cc (~ i~ t' w ri r ~.L.~ '~' /`f J C r• /~ ~~ v I'~ l Page 2 of 2 WHEREFORE, your Petitioner respectfully requests that the Zoning Ordinance of Roanoke County be amended and that the above-referenced parcel of land be rezoned as set out in number 4. FURTHER, your Petitioner requests that this petition be referred by the Secretary to the Roanoke County Planning Commission for its consideration and recommendation. Respectfully submitted, Ceti loner VIRGINIA: Page 1 of 2 BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY A ~ acre parcel of land, ) generally located ~S 3~ _ C1~~ ) ~:, ~ ~~ ~' ~ SCc.1 ) within the ~~ , ~ „y ~~ ~~ ) RECOMMENDATION Magisterial District, and ) recorded as parcel # ~G= Lip --Z- k ~"H..c~i ~/~~ ~~~-/d in the Roanoke County Tax Records.) TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY: WHEREAS, your Petitioner R. ~Jilliam Reid builders has filed with the Secretary to the Planning Commission a petition to rezone the above-referenced parcel of land from ~-1 ~,?usiness ~. District to R-2~ hi~Siness District for the purpose of n~pr~tin an nffirP ~n~l a erhnnl fnr the srts WHEREAS, the petition was referred to the Planning Commission which, after due legal notice as required by Section 15.1-431 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended, did hold a public hearing on June 2 19 87 and WHEREAS, at that public hearing all parties in interest were afforded an opportunity to be heard; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due consideration has recommended to the Board of County Supervisors that the rezoning be approved with proffered condi ions Page 2 of 2 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission recommends to the Board of County Supervisors that the above- referenced parcel of land be zoned B-~, Business with conditions District. The above action was adopted on motion of Lee B. Eddy on--se~vrrd-~y ------------------------------------; and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Eddy, Jones, Flippen, !~litit,- ~~!instead NAYS : 'one ABSENT: `lone Respectfully submitted, ~, A I~ Secretary Roanoke County Planning Commission ~« ~_ ~- ~~, M ~~ VIRGINIA: Page 1 of 2 BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY A r acre parcel of land, ) generally located ~s~°~6 ~1c.-[~ _ ) Sy ~ ) ' ) FINAL ORDER within the ~,r./,~r .,/~;..~ ,~~/~ Magisterial District, and ) recorded as parcel # 7~,Zc~°z-~~-,p~~~J~Z~, ~~G'~/ri in the Roanoke County Tax Records.) TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY: WHEREAS, your Petitioner R. !li 11 i am Reid Bui 1 ders F7 F- 0 U Q H n ~i Q nY a. c did petition the Board of County Supervisors to rezone the above- referenced parcel of land from ;-?. 3usiness District to !;-2 3usiness District for the purpose of o eratin an office and a school for the arts WHEREAS, after due legal notice, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing of the petition on ,J~ne 7 19~, at which time, all parties in interest were given an opportunity to be heard; and WHEREAS, after full consideration, the Board of County Supervisors determined that the rezoning be approved with Proffer of Conditions on June 23, 1987 NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDERED that the aforementioned parcel of land, which is contained in the Roanoke County Tax Maps as Parcel and recorded in Deed Book 1241 page 01477 and legally described below, be rezoned from B-1 Business District to R-2 Business District. ~- Page 2 of 2 Legal Description of Property: BE IT FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this order be transmitted to the Secretary of the Planning Commission and that he be directed to reflect that change on the official zoning map of Roanoke County. ADOPTED on motion of Supervisor Garrett and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens NAYS: ABSENT: Supervisor Johnson ~~Y1~~- ~. Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors CC: Real Estate Assessor Development Review Coordinator Director o~ Planning ,. ~ l , ~'"~ _ M ~~ ~-, z w 0 U O ~- N Q 0 w 0 a VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY p, acre parcel of land, ) generally located ~~i~ %~:~ t1~%~ ) ~~{ ~ ~~ ~" ~%h'~i~'f !~ -~~ ~~ ~ ) PROFFER / / / ) OF within the ~ />~~ -l i a,r /7. /~: ) CONDITIONS Magisterial District, and ) recorded as parcel # ~ ~~`> ~Z'~ ~~it~~~,;, u~ ~ flD in the Roanoke County Tax Records. ) TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY: Being in accord with Sec. 15.1-491.1 et seq. of the Code of Virginia and Sec. 21-105E. of the Roanoke County ning ~ . ,' ~~ ~ ~/ Ordinance, the Petitioner hereby voluntarily proffers to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia the following conditions to the rezoning of the above-referenced parcel of land: G.. ! / '~"' ~ ~I~F.'-~~ ./ ~~~ .l L/fir L` ~: L f /'~.~,~'S~ d ~\ ~-.- . ~ - fi~rr, ~~ ~~ ,J ~., w ~ ,- .- J . Respect y sub itted,~ ~,~ Petitioner ..JReM ~,~ f r.. METES AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTION JAMES BUCK PLUMBING AND HEATING R. WILLIAM REID. BUILDER, INC. ALL OF 'THA'T CERTAIN TRACT CAF LAND G""JNTAINING U .~?3 ACRE LO!vATED IN THE WINDSOF. HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT, ROANOKE GOi,JNTY'. VIRGINIA AND BEING MORE PARTICUARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT AN IRON PIN ON THE EAST SIDE OF OLD GAVE SPRING ROAD {50' RIGHT OF WAYt AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF A 1.245 ACRE TRACT CONVEYED TO JAMES BUCK PLUMBING AND HEATING AND R. WILLIAM REID, BUILDER, INC. BY WANDA JEWEL GRISSE CONUUN. THENCE NORTH 0.'48' 10" EAST 164.64' ALONG THE EAST SIDE OF OLD GAVE SPRING ROAD TO AN IKGN PIN. THENCE NORTH 74° 1'~' 00" EAST ''0.80' LEAVING OLD GAVE SPRING ROAD TO A FOUND IRON PIPE. THENCE NORTH 86° 02' :;5" EAST 70.00' TO A POINT' THEIVGE SOUTH 16" 24' S0" EAST 104.5' fA PROPOSED IVEW DIVISION Ll"NE1 THRU THE 1.x'45 ACRE TRACT TO A POINT IN THE NORTHERN LINE OF A !J.076 ACRE TRACT CONVEYED TO JAMES BUCK. PLUMBING AND HEATING AND R. WILLIAM REIL}. BUILDER. INC. BY' WILLIAM M. RC~SOLOWSKY. THENCE NORTH 8~+° 18' 40" EAST 20' WITH THE NORTHERN LINE OF THE 0.076 ACR1~' T'RAi:_'.T TO A FOUND IROt~i PIPE. THENCE NORTH 08° v31' 10" WEST !aITH THE EASTERN LINE OF 'fHE 0.076 ACRE TRACT TO A POINT 56.1''. THENCE SOUTH 81° 05 " 10" WEST 166.45' ALONG THE SOUTHERN BOUI~IDAttY OF THE 0.076 ACRE; TRACT AND THE 1.245 ACRE T'RACT' CROSSING A CREEK TO THE BEGINNING AND BEING ALL OF THE 0.076 ACRE TRACT AND 0.137 ACRE OF THE 1 . ''=~45 ACRE TRACT . 1 p~T`YONER; LARRY D. FISHER SASE N[~4BER: 23-6/87 Planning C~unission Hearing Date: June 2, 1987 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: June 23, 1987~y ~ ~~ ~~ rG~r 1. RF7,2UEST -JUT~ ~~1~`~,1~5 SLID ~`~-~~~"(~ f Lar IS D. isheUr to rezone a 0.93 acre tract fran B-l, Business to Petition o rY B-3, Business to operate a used automobile dealership located at the northwes intersection of Route 460 and Shawnee Drive in the Catawba Magisterial District. 2. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION No one in opposition was present at the Planning Ccnanission Public Hearing. 3. SIGNIFICANT IMPACT FACTORS a. Comprehensive Plan• 1985 Comprehensive Development Plan has placed this area within a Transition land use category. The petitioner's request is not consistent with either the land use plan map or the droiosedpusecdoes specifically, policies TR-1,TR-3, and TR-8. However, p p provide a transition between a busy primary highway and an existing industrial area. licies b. Site Layout: Site design would benefit from closer adherence to the po contained within statement TR-8 specifying landscaping, building location, and access controls. The nature of petitioner's business requires that vehicles rather than landscaping and building facade be prominent from the street. Entrance to property from Shawnee Drive would be preferable to access from U.S. 460. 4. PROFFERED CONDITIONS a. Use of property will be limited to the sale of used autcgtiobiles. b. No outside storage of inoperable vehicles or junk vehicles. c. Development will be in general accord with submitted concept plan dated 5-11-87, including the landscaping. d. An additional point of access from Shawnee Drive will be constructed. e. No billboards will be constructed on the property. f. Only signage will be single letters on buidling front. 5, COMMISSIONER'S M(7I'ION, VOTE AND REASON Mr. Witt moved to approve the petition carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Jones, Flippen, Witt, Winstead NAYS: ~Y ABSENT: None with proffered conditions. The motion 6. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE a. Mr. Eddy stated that he was opposed to a used car lot in the area. 7. ATTACHMENTS Concept Plan (8~" x 11") Vicinity Map (8~" x 11") Staff Report Other: Robert S lzer, Planning Co~nission Secretary r~ v r~ ~~ STAFF REPORT CASE NUMBER: 23-6/87 PETITIONER: LARRY D. FISHER REVIEWED BY: ROB STALZER~S DATE: MAY 26, 1987 Petition of Larry D. Fisher to rezone a 0.93 acre tract from B-1, Business to B-3, Business to operate a used automobile dealership located at the northwest intersection of Route 460 and Shawnee Drive in the Catawba Magisterial District. 1. NATURE OF REQUEST a. Conditional request to establish and operate a used car lot. b. Attached concept plan and vicinity map describe purpose more fully. 2. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS a. B-3 Zoning District permits a wide variety of intensive commercial uses. Petitioner has proffered to limit the use of the property for the sale of used automobiles. b. Special Exception permit from the Board of Supervisors required. c. VDOT commercial entrance permit required. d. Site plan review required to ensure compliance with County regulations. 3. SITE CHARACTERISTICS a. Topography: Flat b. Ground Cover: Cleared 4. AREA CHARACTERISTICS a. Future Growth Priority: Situated within the Glenvar Community Planning area. Designated as a high growth area surounding petitioner's property currently served by urban services. b. General area is characterized by mixed land use which is predominately industrial. Property abuts U.S. 460 of heavily traveled primary highway. 5. LAND USE IMPACT ASSESSMENT Rating: Rate each factor according to the impact of the proposed action. Use a scale of 1 through 5. = mana eable impact, 1 = positive impact, 2 = negligible impact, 3 g 4 = disruptive impact, 5 = severe impact, and N/A = not applicable. RATING FACTOR 4 3 3 4 3 2 2 2 2 3 COMMENTS v ./ ;P '.:.~ ~ f LAND USE COMPATIBILITY a. Comprehensive Plan: 1985 Comprehensive Development Plan The placed this areauesthis notrcons stentlwith e therttherland use petitioner's q olicies, specifically, policies TR-1, plan map or the defined p TR-3, and TR-8. However, proposed use does provide a transition between a busy primary highway and an existing industrial area. b. Surrounding Land: Primarily industriaos to s deeof cU S e 460x1 with lower density residential on the opp c. Neighboring Area: Same as surrounding land. d. Site Layout: Site design would benefit from closer adeecrefce no the policies containio tion,l andtaccessncontrols.spThe nature landscaping, building of petitioner's business requires throminentlfrom theestreetn landscaping and building facade be p referable to Entrance to property from Shawnee Drive would be p access from U.S. 460. will be one story frame consisting of Architecture: Building 2,250 sq. ft. of floor area. f. Screening and Landscape: Per ordinance. g, Amenities: Adequate parking. h. Natural Features: No negative effect. TRAFFIC roximately i. Street CapacitiepetitionertsAbusinessSwould genepate no more 7200 vehicles. than 100 ADT. Circulation: Access from Shawnee Drive is preferable to propose ]- access from U.S. 460. UTILITIES 2 k. Water: Adequate source and distribution. 2 1. Sewer: Adequate treatment and transmission. DRAINAGE 2 m. Basin: N/A n. Floodplain: PUBLIC SERVICES 2 0. Fire Protection: Within established service standard. 2 p, Rescue: Within established service standard. N/A q. N/A r. 1 s. 2 2 2 2 3 6. 7. Parks and Recreation: School: ..- , ,, C-? ._ _ r TAX BASE - Land and Improvement Value: $93,500 - Taxable Gross Sales/Year: $80,000 - Total Employees: 4 - Total revenue to the County/Year: Approximately $2,000 ENVIRONMENT t. Air: u. Water: v. Soils: w. Noise: x. Signage: Petitioner has stated verbally that the sign will be painted on the building in an unobtrusive manner. However, specific signage has not been proffered. PLAN CONSISTENCY This area is designated as Transition. The petitioner's request is not consistent with the land use plan map or the stated design policies, especially those dealing with design. a. Strengths: (1) Accessible by way of primary highway. (2) Minimal impact on surrounding land use. (3) Minimal impact on urban utilities and services. (4) Specific land use has been proffered. b. Weaknesses: (1) Inconsistent with land use plan map and stated policies especially those dealing with site design. (2) Nature of applicant's business makes compliance with Transition design policies difficult. r i ~ N O w 7 q a 7 0 0 Y~ i. 0 0 n r !•I n .l ^ w~a^ w q w C O w r 6 n Z Ir ~ • 6 •t • O n o a C^ ^ •_ C fl 7 ~ '~^ z wn w won i^•- ewae w~P~w r •as M w e ro`a n>,n co•w z n M ^ 30--' ^~~ ~-'O O O 0 .9 w w n^ N w H w o ' In 0. .~ N ~ C ^ ~N a a~~ Sa ^ w w w a uT nw . o w -a ~N y •(n A~ FN)1 ntnN• ^ o w [w.-~ O P • a • yw C w• 1 r - a •t • NA ~o o. •-_- •a a n •ian n n ~~ • ~ [ ~ Y o-• inw ate.. ~..,n nr ~ v O j \ O VO .J v w A T 'O O C r o o^ w ^ o ~..~ yi : an as ~ _ T o.•s a ••. w o .~s •^ o tt nco ° .w Mw io^ or~o n +1 w H • ^ w r.w .i ~n 7n eM^ e~^' o .. o.• w ~-a 0 0 0 • ~ o n a d ^T ww n ~ r m ~ A ~~~ ~\1 ~ ~ ~' ~ ~~(_ ~~~ o ~ z8 ~0 ~ ~ ~l ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~. ~ ~~ ~ ~ U N (?; tu ~ -~ ~ . u rn m 1 i I r r ~y ,` ,lY ~,o o ~~ U i~ m,r ~`y ~' \'V ~, r i zo~~Ea B-l r ~,T J I I r- ~ ~ i ~' i L L~U ~~ C ~~ ~~ ~b ~m Z~ ,7~ O~ /A~ 0 ~b ~~ o~ 1D~o O Gl Y y 0 ~~ 7n U~ T~ Y U m~ ~(~ Ci \ U T G~ `~' (`' 0 % ~ ' ~~ / ~ p~ ~ i m m l ~ ~ ~ i i ,~ J ~i ° n. i I <~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ 0 I ~ ~ I I ,, O ~ N -y r - I I ~ 24 ~a, S ~ I i o / 2 '7.57'_ ~ ~ y .O I I EE ~i4/!/E 50" ~wJ- ~- on ~ o I I I S/-!~ t~/i1/ w o • ~ 1Jl 11..1 ZQ~~L./ ~_2 \ A` AND ASSOGI ATES~ \ i~ ~I 1 • PLANNERS • ARCHITECTS • ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS • REFLECTING TOnnoRR 16 South College Avenue • Salem, Virginia •389-7323 I A ~~~ P rim 3 ~, m 0 - err-- S/ , _ ~'.~ I i z.~r / '~ ~_ e ~ 829 ~ '~ ~ ~ i ~ 'fo+r a[wq / 858 ~~ .r,F'~ ~w.r~w/// ~` ~'.. /~ ~ /~ \ i/~ ' `.fie `~` l ~ ~ VICINITY MAP k1~iG ri •~ :~~ _. f /'; 'e "" , ~~ 639 .~ ~~ - iT 39 \~jGREEN Hill " \ ry'o O 8 ~~q'r ' ~~fF9 ,~\~~~~ • ~ r, . s... ~',~ D ~noru ~.~~~ ~ ~~ ~~~ ~~ - ' d~ , ROANOKE COUNTY Larry D. Fi Sher DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT B-1 to R-3 w/ special excepti on ~._ ` . VIRGINIA: Page 1 of 2 BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY A 3.93 acre parcel of land, ) generally located at the northwest ) intersection of P.oute 466 and Shawnee ) Drive ) FINAL ORDER within the ('a -avaba Magisterial District, and ) recorded as parcel # 55.02-2-14 ) in the Roanoke County Tax Records.) ~ TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY: w ~- 0 U 0 N- a a w 0 a Q WHEREAS, your Petitioner Larry D. Fisher did petition the Board of County Supervisors to rezone the above- referenced parcel of land from B-1, Business District to B-3, Business District for the purpose of operating a used car dealership WHEREAS, after due legal notice, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing of the petition on June 2 1937 at which time, all parties in interest were given an opportunity to be heard; and WHEREAS, after full consideration, the Board of County Supervisors determined that the rezoning be approved with proffered conditions and Special Exception Permit on June 23, 1987 NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDERED that the aforementioned parcel of land, which is contained in the Roanoke County Tax Maps as Parcel 55.02-2-14 and recorded in Deed Book 1201 page 264 and legally described below, be rezoned from B-1 Business District to !- B-3 Business District. . ;,, ~ . Page 2 of 2 Legal Description of Property: Tract F, containing 0.93 acres, according to the Plat of the Fort Lewis Industrial Park, made by T. P. Parker & Son, dated July 1, 1981, and reoorded iri Plat Book 9, Page 202, in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia and BEING a portion of the same property conveyed to Salem Ready Mix Concrete, Inc., by deed dated December 29, 1983, from Joseph C. Thomas and Susan L. Thomas, his wife, and Lewis P. Thomas and Minnie B. Thomas, his wife, of record in the Office of the Clerk aforesaid in Deed Book 1201, page 264. BE IT FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this order be transmitted to the Secretary of the Planning Commission and that he be directed to reflect that change on the official zoning map of Roanoke County. McGraw ADOPTED on motion of Supervisor and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens NAYS: ABSENT: Supervisor Johnson -~yL~~ ~/_ Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors CCs Real Estate Assessor Development Review Coordinator Director of Planning ~ i + , F . VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY A acre parcel of land, ) generally located ) C ~ G r ~-~ ~ r~ ~~.~ c-l ~; .~} u't~'e e (.~i", ) PROFFER -J G~• ~. /ri~u ~ e J 1 ;{ /r~ « ~ r- y.~ u, i (` l, -~ ~ %~ ,•'- 1 ) OF within the ~~,q ~,{ ~,.~_ ~~ ~ ) CONDITIONS Magisterial District, and ) recorded as parcel # "'- c,) ~ '7 - 1 `-~ ) in the Roanoke County Tax Records. ) cz TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY: ~ Being in accord with Sec. 15.1-491.1 et seq. of the Code of w o Virginia and Sec. 21-105E. of the Roanoke County Zoning U ~ Ordinance, the Petitioner ,~ ~ /y~ J/ ,(~. ~/I ~~ (ur ~ hereby voluntarily proffers to the Board of Supervisors of 0 LtJ o Roanoke County, Virginia the following conditions to the rezoning ~ ' Q of the above-referenced parcel of land: '~ ~s ~ o F "~Z,o~ E r{"r~~ W'~ lI Ise. 1 ~ •Yi t'~ E~ `To Z+~ E S r~t.G of ~sE~ /Q~ iomo611-~. Z~ Np ov"TSl'DE S"5'OrZIQG'E OF ~inJoP£RF1JpJ~ VE~IGLES~ p2 ~Junli~, VEhIIC,L~, 3) ZjE,V£Lv~~~.~.TC lJ'tJJ be~ i~ ~c.~lE2AL ACG02D w',T4a Sa4h-tiTTE'n c.e.J[.E'~7 ~IA~/ 5-~~-~~ . INCLUDING THE LAPJDSCRPI"JG. ~k) APJ ADDITIO"JAL POINT OF P.CCESS FROit1 SHA!~JiJEE DRIVE !~IILL BE COfJSTRUCTED. 5) PJO BILLBOARDS !JILL BE COPJSTRUCTED Of~l THE PROPERTY. 6) ONLY SIG"JADE !'JILL BE SIPlGLE LETTERS O~~l 6UILDIiJG FRONTAGE. Respectfully s mitt d, ~eti er L E G A L N O T I C E Notice is hereby given to all interested persons that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at 7:00 p.m. on Tuesday, June 23, 1987, in the Community Room at the Roanoke County Administration Center, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, S.W., Roanoke, Virginia, on the petition of Larry D. Fisher, requesting rezoning from B-1 Business to B-3 Business and a Special Exception Permit of a tract containing 0.93 acre and located at the northwest intersection of Route 460 and Shawnee Drive in the Catawba Magisterial District. Rezoning and Special Exception Permit has been requested to operate a used automobile dealership. The County Planning Commission recommends approval with proffered conditions. A copy of the Zoning Ordinance of Roanoke County and amendments thereto as well as a copy of the petition, site plan, and other documents related to this request may be examined in the office of the Department of Development, located in Room 600 at the Roanoke County Administration Center. Roanoke County will provide assistance to handicapped persons desiring to attend public hearings. Such individuals are requested to contact the County office of Personnel Services ([703] 772-2018) if special provisions are necessary for attendance. Given under my hand this Fourth day of June, 1987. ,~. C~-~ Mary H. A11en, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Please publish in the evening edition of the Roanoke Times and World News on: Tuesday, June 9, 1987 Tuesday, June 16, 1987 Direct the bill for Publication to: Larry D. Fisher 5004 Buffalo Circle Salem, Virginia 24153 VIRGINIA: Page 1 of 2 BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY A , ..3 acre parcel of land, ) generally located~~,r,~~. ~, ~~~ ~{~n~~re_~~r.) ~ ) within the ( ~~ ~ ;; ct ~ 4 ) RECOMMENDATION Magisterial District, and ) recorded as parcel # y 5-, :-1- ~1 - I `! ) in the Roanoke County Tax Records.) TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY: WHEREAS, your Petitioner /'' ~ ` ~`'•~ has filed with the Secretary to the Planning Commission a petition to rezone the above-referenced parcel of land from ~- District to ,(~ j District for the purpose of WHEREAS, the petition was referred to the Planning Commission which, after due legal notice as required by Section 15.1-431 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended, did hold a public hearing on ~) ~. r: ~ ~~ 19 ~ and WHEREAS, at that public hearing all parties in interest were afforded an opportunity to be heard; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due consideration has recommended to the Board of County Supervisors that the rezoning be approved with proffered conditions Page 2 of 2 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission recommends to the Board of County Supervisors that the above- referenced parcel of land be rezoned to 3-3 Business with proffered conditions District. The above action was adopted on motion of Don 'Ji t on_~.ecnn.d_h~t ------------------------------------; and upon the following recorded vote: AYES : Bones , F1 i ppen , ,~Ji tt, !Ji nstead NAYS : Eddy ABSENT: "lone Respectfully submitted, ~~ Secret y Roanoke County Planning Commission Page 1 of 2 VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY p, , ~,3 acre parcel of land, ) r, generally located~hn~ v~~c~~ ~-,~ t/;,%~~~/~~"~ ~-~ ,~a ~ q ~ ~ ~ ) PETITION within the Magisterial District, and ) recorded as parcel # _~~~- c J - ;1.~ ) in the Roanoke County Tax Records.) TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY: our Petitioner ~-~r'r ~ ~'°' '~~ WHEREAS, y respectfully files this petition pursuant to Section 21-105 of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance and in accordance with the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended, and would respectfully show the following: 1) The Petitioner is the owner of the above-referenced parcel of land. 2) The property is presently zoned under11 the provisions of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance as ~J~ f District. 3 ) The property is designated ~~ ~1 Il% ~ ~ 5 `~ ~ w~ in the Future Land Use Guide of the Roanoke County Comprehensive Development Plan. 4) Your Petitioner now desires to have this property rezoned as District for the purpose of "~ Page 2 of 2 WHEREFORE, your Petitioner respectfully requests that the Zoning Ordinance of Roanoke County be amended and that the above-referenced parcel of land be rezoned as set out in number 4. FURTHER, your Petitioner requests that this petition be referred by the Secretary to the Roanoke County Planning Commission for its consideration and recommendation. Respectfully submitted, Item ~~ ~'~ `! ~'~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKEONCOUESDAYDMINISTRATION CENTER IN ROANOKE, VA., MEETING DATE: June 23, 1987 SUBJECT: Vacation of record map, Ramsgate Court COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Jerry W . and Janette La Buofh RamsgateeCourt Bo Thatf reque t shas to vacate the record m P Attorne for Mr. and Mrs. been withdrawn by Richard Padgett, Y Bush. The vacation of the record map will be handled administratively. FISCAL IMPACT: None RECOMMENDATION: No action required by the Board of Supervisors. ITTED BY: Arnold Covey' Director, Developmen Review APPROVED: -~'"~ i ~. 2 Elmer C. Hodge, Jr. County Administrator ------------ ------------ ----------------- VOTE ACTION No Yes Abs Approved ( ) Motion by: Denied Received ( ) Referred To Brittle Garrett Johnson McGraw Nickens 1 .s~"' LEGAL NOTICE OF A PUBLIC HEARING IN RELATION TO A PROPOSED ORDINANCE VACATING TIIE PLAT OF THE RA*iSGATE COURT SUBDIVISION AS SHOWN I;1 PLAT R}?CO?tiI~I:D IN PLAT iin0.: g, PAGE 3~i Pursuant to the provisions of Sectl.o:i 15.1 - 4:32 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended to date, The Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia, hereby gives notice that a* a regular meeting of the said board to be held on Tuesday June 23, 1987 at 7:!30 o'cloc}{. p.m.> in the Community Room of the Roanoke Count Board of Su ervisors at 3738 Brambleton Ave., Roanoke, the Bc3ard will hold a public hearing on the motion of Jerry W. Bush and Janet T.. Bush, that the plat of the P.amsgate Court Subdivision, the streets shown thereon (aJ 3'et undeveloped), and the restric- tions also shown thereon, b+~ vacated. The t.}lat sought to be vacated pursuant to Section 15.1 - 482 is of record in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of the County of Roanoke at Plat Book g, page 3`3. At said hearing, parties in interest anc3 citizens shall have the oppoutunity to be heard relative to this matter. Jerry W. IIush and Janet L. Bush f ~ Gl `-;~ / l By : ~~,-,i ~J i Of Counsel L. Richard Padgett, Jr: 300 Second Street Salem, VA 24153 Counsel f.or Petitioners Y V I R G I N I A BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE IN RE: VACATION OF PLAT (Dated September ~ 5, 1972) OF THE RAMSGATE COURT SUB- P E T I T I O N DIVISION AS SHOWN IN PLAT RECORDED ~ IN PLAT BOOK 8, PAGE 38 '~ COME NOW the petitioners, JERRY W. BUSH and JANAT L. BUSH, husband and wife, and hereby represent that they are the owners in fee simple of the property described in the copy of the deed of conveyance dated April 21, 1987, (attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and by reference incorporated herein). Petitioners further represent that the property aforesaid is subject to the dedication in fee simple of the streets and roadways (Ramsgate Circle and Wycombe Road) to the County of Roanoke, Virginia, and to certain restrictions as shown on the plat of the Ramsgate Court Subdivision recorded on ~ in Plat Book 8, page 38, in the Office of the Clerk, Circuit Court, County of Roanoke, Virginia. (See copy of Plat attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and by reference incorporated herein.) Petitioners assert that said streets and roadways have never been developed; and, that furthermore, the land referred to hereinabove in the first paragraph of this petition has never actually been developed by petitioners or their predecessors in title to be sold off as lots. Petitioners moreover assert that the streets and roadways as L. RICHARD PADGETT, JR. ATTORNEY AT LAW SALEM, VIRGINIA 24753 --~ ~' 3edicated and restrictions serve no purpose or benefit to the County of Roanoke, Virginia, or to any of the other present owners of lots in the Ramsgate Subdivision either in the present or in the future, and that vacation of the same shall not cause any adverse effect on any citizen of the County of Roanoke, Virginia. On the other hand, the continued existence of the dedication of the streets and roadways and restrictions aforesaid shall affect adversely the usefulness and marketability of the realty aforesaid for the petitioners. WHEREFORE, petitioners respectfully request that the plat dated c/ ~ , '1,. and recorded in Plat Book 8, page 38, including the streets and roadways and restrictions be abandoned, vacated and discontinued by ordinance duly adopted by this Board. Respectfully, JERRY W. BUSH and JANAT L. BUSH By; ~~ a 0 Counsel L. Richard Padgett, Jr. 300 Second Street Salem, VA 24153 Counsel for petitioners L. RICHARD PADGETT, JR. II _ 2 _ ATTORNEY AT LAW SALEM, VIRGINIA 24153 i .. V I R G I N I A BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE IN RE VACATION OF PLAT (Dated September k 5, 1972) OF THE RAMSGATE COURT SUB- P E T I T I O N DIVISION AS SHO[tiTN IN PLAT RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 8, PAGE 38 ~'~ 7C COME NOW the petitioners, ,JERRY W. BUSH and JANAT L. BUSH, husband and wife, and hereby represent that they are the owners in fee simple of the property described in the copy of the deed of conveyance dated April 21, 1987, (attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and by reference incorporated herein). Petitioners further represent that the property aforesaid is 'subject to the dedication in fee simple of the streets and roadways (Ramsgate Circle and Wycombe Road) to the County of Roanoke, Virginia, and to certain restrictions as shown on the plat of the Ramsgate Court Subdivision recorded on ~~ ~--' in Plat Book 8, page 38, in the Office of the Clerk, Circuit Court, County of Roanoke, Virginia. (See copy of Plat attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and by reference incorporated herein.) Petitioners assert that said streets ai>.d roadways have never been developed; and, that furthermore, the land referred to hereinabove in the first paragraph of this petition has never actually been developed by petitioners or their predecessors in title to be sold off as lots. Petitioners moreover assert that the streets and roadways. as raA RD PADGETT, JR. ' TORNEY AT LAW EM. VIRGINIA 24153 ' v dedicated and restrictions serve no purpose or benefit to the County of Roanoke, Virginia, or to any of the other present owners of lots in the Ramsgate Subdivision either in the present or in the future, and that vacation of the same shall not cause any adverse effect on any citizen of the County of Roanoke, Virginia. On the other hand, the continued existence of the dedication of the streets and roadways and restrictions aforesaid shall affect adversely the usefulness and marketability of the realty aforesaid for the petitioners. WHEREFOKE, petitioners respectfully request that the plat dated -=t-t7~ and recorded in Plat Book 8, page 38, including the streets and roadways and restrictions be abandoned, vacated and discontinued by ordinance duly adopted by this Board. Respectfully, JERRY W. BUSH and JANAT L. BUSH By : u,. 0 Counsel L. Richard Padgett, Jr. 300 Second Street Salem, VA 24.153 Counsel for petitioners CHARD PADGETT, JR. II 2 _ .'"TORNEY AT LAW .F M, VIRGINIA 24153 :;,:~ Ai ~ n;~. E T I 9 F S ~; 'r ~_ r ~ ~~_ ;,.! ~-'rt S ~3UAR; t.7r S'JPc:~<VI SC)riS ~'3ri 3iiAP'1~L~T~}^' Sr1 ~ ~ 8 ~ X ~~ B') t- FtC,~ti~~Kc VA '?+?~l3 STATc ~F ~'I~GI"••!IA ;. ITY OF 'ii' A^JC3KE 4Ff=I(?AV?T tF °JRi._IC ±TIGN I, iTHE. J^JC;r~SIG~i~=~) AV (FFICEF {~F T IR"ES-~~r.LU +.~C.':~c'ATI`~t'd>, ~HIC~-i CCR- f'L'RA1I:J 1S Pt71LI5lER GF THE R~JA~d~KE T IrtFS ~: '~sC'i~L~-i~~;~lSf A DAILY NEI~SPA~'=k ~Uf:,LISH'=^ I;v f~Ard[~KEt itV THE STATE ~F V I~` GI ^•i I ~;, ~,~t:+ t/Ei'.T IF Y THAT THE ANlV EX~C~ VAT I~ E 'Y;AS PUE?L ISHr[? I~,; S~I~ 'dEWSPaP=i.S L "~ THE Ft:t_I_('s~ii,d°:; iATS s; iT~y~SS ~ T~; i.S ;. 7T t-1 )~~Y +.3 i= .~~J'~SE ~ab7 -y~_.~__._-__- ---_-- CFFi~~r-;.+S Si JATl1F'E PUBLIC NOTICE Please be advised that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County at Its meeT- inp on the 23rd date of June, 1987, aT the Roanoke County Administration Center in Roanoke, Virginia, at 7:00 p.m. or as soonThereafter as The matter may be heard, will hold a public hearing on The following matter, To-wit: Establishment of construction i fund Driority for the secondary system of The State Highways for Ftscai Year 1987-88. All members of The Dublic inter- ested in the matter set forth, above may appear and be'.. heard at the time and place aforesaid. A copy of the Droposed scheduh thee ResldencYvOffice,f5tste Highway Department, 711 South Brosd Street SAlem, Vlrginia, and the County Ad- minlstrotor's Office, 3736 BrambleTon Avenue, Roanoke, Vlrginia, where IT is j available for public inspection during regular business hours. Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Baard of $UDerVI50r5 (23556) ITEM NUMBER c~' ~~" 0.f AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: June 23, 1987 SUBJECT: Funding Priorities, Secondary Highway Six Year Plan COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~~/VW SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: As a requirement of VDOT Policy, the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors must prioritize funding allocation to each project within the Six Year Construction Plan. Attached for the Board's Review is a copy of the recommended priority list. As you will note, the additional funds created by the General Assembly during the 1986 Special Session will certainly expedite many projects throughout Roanoke County. After due notice, the Board needs to conduct a Public Hearing to receive comments from the public on the proposed funding priorities. At the conclusion of the public hearing, the Board needs to approve a final funding priority for secondary highway construction in Roanoke County for 1987-88. For the record, the Board gave preliminary approval to the attached "Priority List" on May 26, 1987. FISCAL IMPACT: No County funds are involved. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board approve the attached Priority List Resolution. SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED: _ ~ ~ ~ Phill' T. Henr P.% Elmer C. Hodge Dire or of Engi eer~ng County Administrator ~. r ~` ~ `! ----------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE M t' b No Yes Abs Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to o ion y. Brittle Garrett Johnson McGraw Nickens 2 " "i AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HRL~NATUESDAYOAJUNE 20UN1987DMINISTRATION CENTE RESOLUTION NO._APPROVING CONSTRUCTION PRIORITIES FOR TH GINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY SYSTEM FOR ROANOKE COUNTY FOR FISCAL YEAR 1987-88 BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. The Board does hereby establish for fiscal year 1987-88 those certain constuction fund priorities for the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System of Highways in Roanke County as set out on that certain list of priorities with recommended amendments as presented to the Board at its meeting on June 23, 1987; and 2. That a copy of this resolution duly attested be forthwith forwarded to the Virginia Department of Transportation Salem Residency office along with a duly attested copy of said priority list with amendments by the Clerk to the Board. 3 - ~~ EXISTING SECONDARY HIGHWAY 6 YEAR CONSTRUCTION PLAN PROPOSED PRIORITY LIST ~~ a~ S M W i pp I ~~ ~W ~~ LG~''~ r~ " 4•~ ~ ~ ~ a a c,, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ u .o ~ ~o ~-+ .o O f (~ O u ° ~ a '{~ ro ~ ro ~ E ~p 8 8 ~ O O a ~ ~ N ~ V? ~ '~ ~ f~ '-I la 3 2 O ~ ~ z w 0 88~~pp~ 88 00~$O ~ +~-~ U ~ ydy.~~ y U l •° u j 4~ u t?~' ~ u C ' ' - O U ~ (. ~ U pCCC~ C ~ lU.~ •rl O rr--0.~~f W L r-1 ~ .SG Q~ OC 7 td 1~1 C •rl L .D C a~ •.i . b ~C N cC ~C mw u 3 rn~ ~ ~ w6~-Oi ~ ~.] a ~ v ~~ x a i ~ t-~'i-~ a a~ ~i ''" `n a 3 z~ "' p ~ o .gi~pp o u U P4 U •~ N N N •~-1 H ~ • O O ~ ~ o~ ^ 4 q ma ~ ~ ~ o u ~ ~ 0 ~ 0 0 ~ ~~~ yj1 ' y"¢ W ri N ~1 ~ 4 (~ / :~ ~~ ~~ ~' ~. ~ ~~ ~ a ° ` Q, w ^ rn q •iy °' a ~ rn ~, ~, o o q ~ ^\ ~ , ~ O ~ 0 ~ u .. .` ~ L (. L ~ ~ ~y .~ ~ .C IPA Ci ~ ~ 7 V1 ~ ~ ~ H I ~ 0 ^ <? ~ Q f'1 q N ~ Q n~ ~ ~ u ~y U u H C 'y ~ O [s. U q f-1 .b ~ O v 7 ~ N k7 4 ,~ ~ _. •p 0.i U u r-I r, U I ~ n ~ N '~' ~ u ~ ~ G y ~ 'dp G.' LG (J1 U ~ ~Uy ~ .^-I oM0 ~p u u ' JCl ~ O C j ~~ M H ~ U U ~ .. • W aaa zvi a ~ ~ w ~ ~' ~ a z ~ o ~ ~^ '"a q U £ ~O ~ ~ ~ ~y O~ ~ N N ` ~ ~ ' N r N 4 ~a N 4 4 ~ ~ ~ N qi O N N ~p N O `$ yr N 4411''/•/• r'1 ~ ~ N ~~y ~O ~ W ~ ~ G a~ ~~ O~~ a Q~Qp~ a F ~ P ~ .. I n ~''~ ~(~ C ,: a. 0o c. ~ a a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. ~ ~, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '.p'~ O u t9 G O +~ t0 C O ~ C ~ ~ N ~ O ¢ ~ .~`: r ~ ~ ~ g N ~ ~ v, N x Y Z O U u H ~ ~ w O ~ O ~ p v N N 'C7 ~ U n G t ~ x a y ~ D ~ . C U Up Ci p ~ p + O a u P ~ . _ u A a a a b o N o. ~ . C 6 w o a s a ~ ~ o .-, o ~ rj N ~ U ~ N (~ j p O N N N II C 0 4 Q T I a a o ~ ~ 0 0 N - u . O t^n ~~^p o0 ~ 0 O O ' ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ a .~ °' ~ a .-~ rn a ~ ~ M u ~ ~O N w ~ 4 ~ ~ z O H ~ ~ Q N ~ O N ~ ~ u ll ~ M ~ + d ,r~ U W ~-1 rd r~ 1.~ ~ fL j • 3 a ~ s ~ `~° o ~n ~ ac o ~ M ti w ~ a V] r-•1 a u ti °' a a S ~ ~ O ~ U ~ U M ~ ~ ~ ~ t a' ! N ~ a ~ .o ~ ^ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ` ° ~ • ~ N ~ p O ~y F t y O ~ ~ W o w E m n rn M l!/ `~ ~f W O .~ u a ~i c°rb L N~ 3 ~~ a _ a u>, ~i~ ~~ '~ u .- ~ ~ a r ~ L pp f/~ b G V1 W b C V) a: E g O g O ~ N ~ `~ O ~ 1~1 N ri N '.{ U o E u rrr777 w > ; ~ n ~ o y u 3 o a ~a d ' u0 0 ,~~ ,-~ W _ W .0 ~ N1 W ~ dl O ~ ~{ ~ 70Sy.1~ N r-1 7U7 O O a cpp ~ c pub"' 7 ~~ U t~ uu u G / x °'~° ~o ~ xa "o a o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o v v w .~ s, S L~ V (sy~7 ~ ~ O ® ~ w ~n { U y`' ~ Cn N Cv N ~ ~ ~ ~D n .. Q~ O O O O n ~ n ~ n ~ ~ O O O amp O ~ ~ ~ - y . i r~-I ~ W CQ ~ ~"" +4 .1 7 H 7 (S /~ ~ ~ ~~ 1~ .~ r-1 ~`~~ L L ~ • ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ w ~ ~ ' iy •.1 ~ ~ O1 '~ ~ u TJ ar 'D ~ o o u ~ ~ c ~ ~ '~ c w w g ~ ~ ~j N ~ a N M vii 77 ~~~~aa d y ~ uY CC r i O~ n N ~ M ~ a 9 ti W ( 7 r r ry ry J + ~ M //y--~~ C C 0 ~ ~ pp - ~ ~ N • ~ ~ N ~ N ~ ~ ~ y~ a d ~ „" Z C a ! a.i a.u ~ ~ as ~~ ~ Na ~ M ~ ~ c~v ~ a i i ~- ~ ,; ao ~ •g c M .-i O O o ~ o ~wr U U ~p U F O~ ~ Q P'~ ~ ~ V1 N N pp ma ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 N ~~ pp O N ~ a n O p ~~ E ~ (z ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ 2 )N N 1 (n F W rn .-~ u M U .~ W 'o w o~ a n .i a U a ai H O M t~ ~ U '-1 u~ .~-1 a ~., ~~ as ~z ~~ O W O O U tP1 n u .,.{ •u w '~ .~ w gg O N u .~ u W b w O n N ~O N ~D 'i u ~a N3 u a ai N H O ~i U N O~ O~+ u •.~ u w v .D v u c c .~, w S s c^'1 ~O n M N L LY. C ~, vii W .~ I+~ a ~Ny ~' H O M O U N o~ rn 0 ~~ a~ ~~ oa~~ Aa W M Q Q W a C~ W r-1 a ;. x oA ~ ~ ~ ~' s ~ ~ I .~ ., o 1 0 o .~ 0 ~. 0 1 0 o a ao ~; ao o a .~ m QO o ~ v ~ ~! O ~i ~ - N , l7 °0 8 ~ 8 g ' o 0 ' " 0 o N ~ 0 o ° co - ~ ~ p ~ ~ ~ y „ z O F O O rl ~ - 17 c.~ a N a Q p „- cn o ; ~p m P . ,-7 C dp sO 9 fJ g r ~ "> ,~ S (~ m Q ~ c ~ RR ~ `c ~ N g ~ ff ~ R ~ ~ ~ a `Q" ~ ~ ~ ~ 8 ~ ~ 3 F F N , f ~ m~ 9 O ~~ N N 2S n w S ~t~ I ~ _ _ ~~ff N 3 ° V ~ +n r i ~, ~ ,tl '7 3 Oo T ~ - - F w yFl J o ~ ° /- J ~ ° ~ ,Jc a F a~ ~ J ~ N J 0. a 8 ss b a ~ ooZ '3 -° a«~ t° cab F' O ~ F 1i ,,, h ~ m ~ r+ ~ m ~ a` z Q~ o~ a d a t w ~ lr x O AS v o 1- ~~ ~ ~ - ° 3 ~ ,~y ~ U z W O ~ Ki i 0 4~ ,O r- ~ N ~ r1 r r O ~...1 ~ pE'li H G 0. p N e _ d h V j i` ~ ~ ~ , J 4 ~ CC < C pc i ` P~4 O J 4 N p Z O~ 1 H ~ ~ ~ Rl O i i Y l i ' t Z ` y W ~ ~ < yl ~ V ~' ~ d .'~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ N ~. N ~ 9f' 7 nl S h ~ ~~,N ~ ~ s l ~' Z 2 - ~ ~ f 1~~ ~ ": ~ 0~ N ~ _ Z - A ~ p ~ ~ ,( ~~( .a, ~O`~ ~ F- j~ 1QO 1 ~ V O W .l JV ON o J . O F E ~2 KI Z J O " ~ } j O F uj O r i ~ Ot ~ } • I 6c ~ F O O < G O O f ui J 1 O 1 O O a • p Z V ~( i { t= ~` ~~ ~ ~ _ i O ~ r ~ N 2 ( H ~ .. ~ v O o~(Y 0~ ~ a .` ~ a~Q' i (Y o ; a J ~ 3 ~ u+ W ok~°~°c o ~° ~ifl-~ 04 ~ ~ 9wr' 9LLF J6 ~ o W 3 N ~ ~ W 0 ~ N~ ~ i w F ~ o> d N ~Q a~ ~~° o ~ q a o > w ~( > N q n ~ eQ N O ~ `r f- l i p . QC U LL Q On N LLa ~ Q w ~ er •,QJ Q~ F ~ ~ o~ J Z ~ ~ j ~ rl R ~ P' F 1 Z a <J O j~ N H 1 Y 'z~ ~ p . ~ N¢ J ~ nl a I SN n44 (~ Ym a 4 U ~ l ~ U Z ~F ° N~ 1 ~ Q r ~ ; O< 0 n Q'O; ~ ~ l H J ° ~ O u N p, , ~ p v 3 F u ' pac F - v p~1 i - ~~ Ov'{, v n n n n <4:: p i:: n n n n ~. ~ ~ ~.~~ H OA N d 7 ~ :J' 1 {M ~ ~,W w~a~ lLJ rn i .~ a .~ .~ .a a i 0 o~ o~ .a o rn i a O O o ~ .. , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r 0 • ~ ~ ~ s o ~t ~: ~ O $ T o ~ ~ N ~ i ~ 8 d O g 0 r a y z .7 N H C ch 0 ~ n Q ^ UY s ~ U O O O a s 9 'n °~ N N I ~ I ~ I g ~ g 6 6 ~ 2S ~ ~ ~ g $ J F F o ,(~ y~ ~ t~ m K] o' 1~ ~ •q ~ ~ 1_ 6 N t( d ~ Q ~f1 N N ~ l7 ~ ~ nj ~ ~ `(1 I I ~ N p o 0 O~J ~ N O U N J ~ O E ~ W ~ < 3 ° ~3 N < lal 1 ~ ~ W ~ ~ a ~ ~ J a ~ Q ~ 1` J ~ ' ' a g 1 ao~~ ~° ~ s n- a ~ 1-° Q 3 ~ 'c3 F°- ao Wa~~ ~ ~ 16 as < QQ I+i ~ 2 Lf1 f' ~ ~ -11 CJ ~ ~ cn U: ~ W O w °= Q. O[ m m ~ N ~ Z ~ ~ ~ ~ 'y N ei n M ' r z LL .~ ~ 3 ~ '~ ~ ~ at O N Fi ~ Q w o- nZ l~ ~< eZ eo'c moo' ~ „ ~ w . . tv F vd w LL N ~ f ~ 9~ E-' ~- QZ~ D N ¢ N 4~ ~ (grmN o Q ! F Q ^ ~ O 7 x CO si N O J O J< ~ , ~ J~ In j ( ~ I~« ~ ~p7 N ~ 1 ~ O O~ N ~ .) ; F O r Q_ N; _~ ~ J ~ O O 1(,f1 F .. ~ J ~ F }S ~ J ~A `~ p Q~ E O" x V V ~ IN~ F t1 W ~ (OL ~ cp Q W .7 ~ F ~ Q ~ F ~ Cl ~Y F W ~ ~ ~ O PL ~ ~ ~ z Q N 0 ~ Z : , O ^ C ~ W K z ; ~ ~ ~ K S O a LY r ~ O a' CY 1 ~ ~ 2 N Q •• ~ L ~' z 9 ~ ~ ~ a O 9 ~ 0 O ~ ~ 9 {" 1o Z ~ ~ Q Z ^ Q i li ~ ~ o 9 ~ N y« p ~~ O O ~ o ; 0 ~ a cv p. ~f p ~ Q U ~ v+ u- a N ~ ~ a _ lal q N v+ LL Q o Q o$ r n pa U.a ~ N o ~ W o > lalaa0 ~ ~ QoO ' o j ~ Zip pi Q a Q> ~ F p ~-_ Q~ v Z r V I'n ~ Z ~ J ~ Q ~>N Q ~- Z Q N ~ Z O ~ tt N o i 0. 8 Z~~ N N Q J+ N x O- W ~ ~ S ' 11' i l~ Q'`-' ~ ~ N `' ~ a u N z a `, n ~ o N a ~ 2~ ~ ~ O ~ ' a ~m~ Z oc o ,9 8 0 = o ~ - ~ y Woa pa FF` ~a ,.~'" ~ ~ a' ~~ ~ F CS a , ~.ie~' ., ,, 9 p W ~ W N • y • ~ . O~ .'1 o~ J r Yl vi d o~ ..1 ~ R ~ ~ $ ~ g o N ~1 o s a ~ (+1 M _ v ~ ~ rn $ 8 ~ p ~ ~ ~ ~ t(1 of rl s .-1 ~ ~ O ~ 7 ,~ S $ a ~ N ~ R ` ~O y N - O~ r-1 y 1/1 O ~~ ~ _. 1 10 1 I I 1 I as o I o 1 I o I o 1 ~ I o I 0 ,,, ~ 1 $ ~ ~ ~ g ~g Q Q ~ o y ~o 8o n ~8 8~ o ~ l o ~ ~v g l~ ~ gm °; s ~l~ ai °7 IJ ~ z ~ w 3 r ~ 3 Z ~ "1 3~ 4 1 2 3~ 'a ~ ~ r s ? r ~ i ~ ~ a oc 3 F° cL a? ~ ~ F- ~ 4 of .4 F- " 1 ; 0. oc 3 ~- 5 ' a oc $ F- w 0 5 v E- 0. w ~ ~ ~ a ° 3 ~ < a oc C • a 1- ; o ~ a ~ ~ 0 ~ aai S 0 i d a o f' J N I J `~~ , '~ J ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ >- Y 1 r F- Z r ~ ~ ~ J 1 1 F C7? < a "' ~~ m ° a a ~ r ` ~ ~ ~' p w ~ Z ~~ J 9 W~ - v L ~ K x v y ,~y l~ Wei ., a 1 O z a a f w o 0 4 ~ p~ 2 1- Z ~n o a F ; Oc F W p i I ~~ > .. a ~9 ~ V1 ~~ y„ Is1 L1 ~ F j~ F QJ °~.i 1 .'~ ~ N 7 F ~ h nT ~ 1 j ~ 7 O No~N h 1 J 111 O O 'J , Z Q h m O ~? O L 1 F~ +~ Q~ O 2 ~ N O F 1 4 1 1 O O i 3 O O Z 4 N O ~~ p 1 Z ~ ,R 0~ `• 4 fj Vj j0 O O ~ O F Q rJ' ~ ~ ~ li {~ ~ Z p~ `!1 Z 1 Z O ; ° ..i ~ 4 I ( ) li F ~ u . w z H Ot 5 i ~ ° L ~ . ~ O 1 F 4 J - Q { a v 9 l r l I ~ a ~ p ? ~ N r ~ ° ~ ° ~ ~ p 9 p 4 ~ > °o ~ v, ~ QL 0 ~ 0. Q lL 1~- m 4 Q ~' i ~ ~ O ~~~ ~ R ~ z 4 LL ~ > ~ Q e w F Q 2 7 o N N ~ p ~ 0 F ~ ~ 2 7 : ° r ~ > ~ (~ 4 9O 3 ~ -- ~ 3 n < ~ ~ ~ ~ 3~ aQ ~ ~ ~ a0 ~ 1 ~ ~ u F ~ 1 K ~ ~ ~ ~ ' Q In u ~ } ~ 1 N r. d O ~ Y cg p '= f" ~ 3 V ~ O 0 ~ 9 ~ ~ 9 o O ~ ~ o o v 0 ~~ U O ~ ~ ('N I ~N ~'/'-~ ~ 0 o r a > Q ' ~j i g s, r -~ 0 0 0 r 0 O s r ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ yx, O ° ?~ o I ; R $ v. `^ ; of o ~ r r ii L .~ LI! ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~~ f= 2 J nl ~ op r ~ J ~ U ~. ~ ~ J ~ F ~ u T ~~~~ g n i I Z .. li F' ~ Oc ~ N p r O ~ O Q f N Q a ~~ ll- 4 q ~ z ~ ~ 0 r ~ N I m ~ ~ ~ 9 }~ j ~ ~ o ~! N U N 1 N 1 ( k: ) 1 Q~ ~~ .i. ~i7 ~'1'-- `. y O W~qy oW4 F ra: F Csd1a .7 PPPGGG i rl O~ O~ ~-1 .~ O~ O rn O~ .i O • O~ ~ ~ rn r 9 ' .~ a ao m a ,,,~ ~ r w i rn .~ ~ O p ~ ~ ,o .~ V1 f y O ."'). M O dFd > U 1 ~ a Ws a~ ~ ~ q F F y ~ ,~; o v i ~ ~ r - `~ 3 ~' w d ac ~ F~ 0 o °~ 1 z H ~ N f 4 ~ ~[ ~ a N s 3 'z a U W ~ ~ ~ q 07 ~ x O W r o O ~ Q a z > w o Z F ~ 1 U Ci t` L ~!1 1 F Q ~~ U N O A N pp77 F 04 ~ U 7 p o p W ~ W ~ O .i ~ O O o + .-~ N ~ i O O 0 rn 0 rn N o rn i °~ a O ~ N °~ O ao rn O O rl N m • • ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ °~ ~~+ N N N 1. • p ~ • O • • ~ a o a ' rn ~ d O ~ ~ '~ -~ cn ~ ~(1 u~ ti ~ O ~ N as ~ 1 o o ~ ,, ~ Q w $ ~ $ @ pos p g tS $ ~ 2i $ I ~ $ $ $ 6 ~ ~ n ~ i g d~ '~ T W I I~ ~ I ~~ ~ I N I(~ N I I p ,~ I I ~1 I I N ~ I ~ W w ~ ~ ~ d °G 0. ~ N ~ ~ 1u Z ~ ~ 3 Z 4 ° 3 ^ 1`- ~ < .~. , r a ~' a H oc F p- ~4 F- a oc ~ 1 d a ~ H a pZ 3 ~° d ~ ~ ~ a ~ S F ~- oc ° E-° a ~ _ 5 ~ s 3 v 2 9 i1 ~ ,~ ~ i ~_ N ~~ ~ ~ ° s ~ h N '' ~ ~ q ~ a ~ O ~ yt ~ ~ « ~ ~ ~ ~ y o u z a ~ h a z a ~ F ~ ~ '~ S ~ ? M 3 ' s ~ ~ 1 e ~ 3 F P+ Z Q ~ i w ~ Z Q H ~ y 3 9 ~ r tp u ~' .9 O ¢ J '° ' r ~ . ~ o d ~ v~ ~ Cn a v~ H x V ~ ~ t ~ ~~ d' K N lu L p ~ ~ 4~ F a y 'J > ~ cY ~ @ f ~ W Q N~ E J ZO /- > ~ 2 ,~ Ij 2 ~ ~ p t , ~y ~ L~ ~ O =o h E} ,~, i ~o"~ 1(1 tt o ~ ~ oc° /~ „ N +~ ~ r ~ Z Y ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r Y I i~ ~ ~ J ~ ~ u (~ V 1 ~ OC d o r 1 { ~ I .. Z1 ~, N LL F J 1 {- ; r' Z (~ 1 K ~ t} ~ W F y 11 1 J Z) ~ a 1 ~ s 1(~ ~ 1 ~~ 1_ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ z H -' lL v` 't 1(1 ~ W 9 H K O d? O ~j W K $Op N O h~ ~ N 4 a 3 sLP ' ~ ~ ~ ~md.> 2 P S ~ `~- c-> ~ o .~ 3~ pd33 O a ro ~ a" ~ ` ~ 3 N 1 4 M ~. z ~ Q LL a 7 p a< ~ 3 a o -- h 0. 4 o ,, ~ a vl a o ~ to ~ ~ °i o<r w aw a w r~ a `} t_ 3 Z r i ~ ~ z o a ~ z o c ~ , ~~ , Q= ~ 2 a M ~ a~ o d' ~ ~ FU- ~ c4 r f- ~ ~' O N 1 a O ~ 1 a ~ v a d~ `~ p ~ a v a O O 4 p . a Cj f' ~ v ~ ~ _ Q ' a ~ a ~ ~ a ~ h ~ ~1 - ~ 1 ._ .. '. ~ VICINITY MAP ~,,. r DEPARTMENT OF REQUEST TO INSTALL INDIVIDUAL WASTEWATER I PUBLIC FACILITIES TREATMENT PLANT - 1723 WYGAL DRIVE, SALEM e ~ ~ `~ ~~~ -- VICINITY MAP __ 1~~~ NORTH .. r. - ~. ' i . . ,~ , ' .;.- ~...~ •,• . _ ~ 4 • •~ • n..• ' ~~ I ~ •~ ~ ~ r I ...r • y rr ' , ~ ~L. I ~` ~ I M.1 I ~~~ ~~~ ~ ' .tyro I r. ,.rte. I ~.,.. • I . ~ I ~ / _ ........_ I I I •~- _1 . ,\ .. O ~ ~~~ ,• ~ ~ ~ ... ~ ~, • ~ ,. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ` .. .~ .: ~, i ~ `., * ,~ .i.. ,T , ~ ' t .. ~ ' ,.~ `'r ~~ * ~ ..~ ... ~ / ~ * ~ ,L ~ ~ r , •O t _ n `. ~ ,,' ~ 7 T • O ' ' ~. I ° r I ~ • *' - ~ t I i ~cstn~ DEPARTMENT OF NORTH LAKE S PUBLIC FACILITIES (p U M P STATION ~ 3 PUBLIC NOTICE Please be advised that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County at its meeting on the 23rd date of June, 1987, at the Roanoke County Administration Center in Roanoke, Virginia, at 7:00 p.m, or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, will hold a public hearing on the following matter, to-wit: Establishment of construction fund priority for the secondary system of the State Highways for Fiscal Year 1987-88. All members of the public interested in the matter set forth above may appear and be heard at the time and place aforesaid. A copy of the proposed schedule referred to above is on file at the Residency Office, State Highway Department, 714 South Broad Street, Salem, Virginia, and the County Administrator's Office, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, Roanoke Virginia, where it is available for public inspection during regular business hours. Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Publish on the following dates: June 9, 1987 and June 16, 1987 Morning and Evening Editions Bill Cost of Publication To: Roanoke County Board of Supervisors P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, Virginia 24018-0798 r AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JUNE 23, 1987 RESOLUTION N0.62387-11 APPROVING CONSTRUCTION PRIORITIES FOR THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY SYSTEM FOR ROANOKE COUNTY FOR FISCAL YEAR 1987-88 BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. The Board does hereby establish for fiscal year 1987-88 those certain constuction fund priorities for the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System of Highways in Roanke County as set out on that certain list of priorities with recommended amendments as presented to the Board at its meeting on June 23, 1987; and 2. That a copy of this resolution duly attested be forthwith forwarded to the Virginia Department of Transportation Salem Residency office along with a duly attested copy of said priority list with amendments by the Clerk to the Board. On motion of Supervisor McGraw, seconded by Supervisor Garrett, and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Johnson A COPY - TESTS: Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk 6/25/87 cc: File John Peters, Assistant Director of Engineering Phillip Henry, Director of Engineering John Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator PUBLIC NCII'ICE Please be advised that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, at its meeting on June 23, 1987, at the Roanoke County Administra- tion Center, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, Roanoke, Virginia, at 7:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, will hold a public hearing and second reading on the following matter, to-wit: ORDINANCE AP'IE~IDING CHAPTER 18, "SEWERS AND SEWAGE DISPOSAL,~~ CnNCERN- ING THE INSTALLATION OF SEP'T'IC TANKS AND REQUIRING A PERMIT AND PRE- SCRIBING FEES FOR THE ISSUANCE OF PERMITS All members of the public interested in this matter may appear and be heard at the time and place aforesaid. ~~ r" Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney Please publish on the following dates in the morning edition: June 9, 1987. June 16, 1987 Please send the invoice to: Board of Supervisors P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 ~ ROANO~ F ~ . ~, Cn~r~trt~ ~~ ~~~~~~~ 1 38 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT PLANNING COMMISSION BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS June 8, 1987 Mrs. Martha Plank Roanoke Times & World-News P.O. Box 2491 Roanoke, VA 24010 Dear Mrs. Plank: Thank you for making the following changes to legal ads which will appear in the evening edition on June 9 and June 16. 1. Petition of Scott and Snyder - please add after "from M-1 Industrial" and A-1 Agricultural. 2. Petition of Richfields Retirement Community - please change the acreage from 0.6 to 28.19. If you have any questions, please call me at 772-2005 or Liz Bradley at 772-2094. Sincerely, Mary H. Allen Deputy Clerk P. O. BOX 3800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24015 (703) 772-2068 O~ ROANp~ F ~ 'A G Z 'A °v a ~i'~i~i~ Ar . ~~ ~~ 1 I i' ^~~ `~~~~ it~ 18 ( 50 88 E S~SQVICENTENN~P~ A Beaurrfu!(3eginrtin~ BOARD OF SUPERVISORS COUNTY ADMIN ISTRATO ~ E308 JOHNSON, CHAIRMAN No ELMER C. HODGE LUNS MAGISTERIAL Dli;rmCT LEE GARRETT. VICE-CHAIRMAN June 25 1987 WINDSOR F9LLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT A , LAN H. BRITTLE CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT STEVEN A. MCGRAW CATAWBA MAG157ERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C.NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT Mr. James A. Kent, Jr. Executive Vice President Roanoke Valley Home Builders Assoc. 1626 Apperson Dr. Salem, Virginia 24153 Dear Mr. Kent:: Attached is a copy of Ordinance No. 62387-9 concerning the requirement of a permit and fee for septic tanks. This resolution was adopted by the Board of Supervisors at their meeting on June 23, 1987. If you need further information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Mary H. Allen Deputy Clerk Attachment P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 (703) 772-2004 W N F-+ '. yy~ C~ ~ ~ O~ ~ v ~ ~ ~ o rn _. 0 0 o v n O W •o ~ ~ ~ ~ ro ~' " ~' t~ ~ ~ ~ ~. ~ ~ F-+ + r ~ y ~• ~ rn N cr ~. a o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~-t n n n it ~'* I ~. ~ ~ ~... ° .~ o o ~ r'S z a~ W N r" S (y V g A '"d v a o w a ~ ~ u ~ n rn v roc b ~ o o cn N H n n O tn~ ~ cnrox~y M . ~ J ~ ' ~ n R'~ ~ .t O CA ~ rr (1, (p F i o' ~' ~ i ~ a ~ ao . ~ ~~ t ~ ~ ~° ~~ C t/> " c ~$oo ~~ ~ $ H f ~ ~` c M r S N N V v y Fr Z a ° ' o a ~ ~ ~ ~ rn i • o rn N N 0 rn N N O O~ O N O~ N N 1 N 0 0 N ~ N v i ~ N ~ bti ~ ~ do O Cr] A. R ba ~. ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~-- N• ~ ~ ~ ~, ~ n ~ ' ~ ~ ~ o o ~' ~ ° ~ a ~ x ~ °a a ~ n ~ ~ ~ rr 1'f ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ (~ x ~ o R a o ~" ~ ~ R a ~'' t1 a o ~, 0 Q~ N O O~ F-+ b O I '~ z 0 ~z ~~ rt ~ ~~ ~~ V V w w V W ,~ --.' ~ a N W N F--+ cv ro o0 b O I ~ H Q~ o ~p ro ~ ~ ~~~ ~' °D ~ ate" x ~ E '-' ~o ~C i~ ~~ CO - G c ~~ H H ^ ~ K GM U K v z In N O O ~, a w ~' .. -7+ H pN Z .~ • o rn °` ~ o ~ ~ V 0 rn ~ V 0 b O I N N ~D C'~ V1 O :d ~ o ~ ~ ~ N n n~ o ~ ~ ~ ~' ~ a. z '~ O ~ ~ ~ v 0 ~, V I O O N N W O o a ;ti ~ oN ~ o '~ a ~~ ~ x .7 R n ~ rr ~ N ( D o x '~ o~ 0 to V O 1 N N 0 f-+ b b 0 a~ c~ R a (~D 0 n C7 x ~~ ., I Q II ~ :v t~ w a O ~ ro o~ N I O O N N ~"~ F-+ 3 -"'' b b o a~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~- ~- ~ ~ ~ I 00 ~ O n ~~ H X. ~ b ~ ~ :~ x ~~ ~~~ ~~ ~~ z~ N ~ a c -' o a ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ v, .o rn p~ O Y a N O ~ ~' o rr ~ °` rn rn a c~ R m N O '3 H ~-' ~ a a o ~, ~ w rn T N O N O~ O N O~ O w r C') O ~ ~ ro R ~ ~ V H O v N ~ ~ N V O C1. Al ~ ~ O O V V O rn V V I O ~ ~ O F-+ ~ ~, ~n 0 ow ~ w 1'T Y,' ~ ~ ~" ~ ~~ ~ o ~ ~ a • °~ N ~ ~ (D -""h W n fD i-r t'i (D W (D n N 'a Na N I F-+ H O O Q~ O ro to 0 N ' N F1 ' ~~ 0 O w 1 ;b O cn ~ ~~ a .~~' ~ ~ zx ~ m z n Q~ O~ V N N a N fy ~~ .o < ~~ i N r V. C N ~'` ~~j H p~ ~ K Z ~ K H p~ Z O v 0 .. ~ v i N W v C'1 O ~ fD fD ~ n N x ~~ ~ R C7 0 F-' N ~ O ~ ~ V '~ ~ I 0 V O~ ~n fi O v rn ~n 0 0 ~ rn b ~ N ~ N i N V N V O ~ N f'r o~ ~~a ~ °a orb 00 ~~ ~ ~'~. ?' W O C ~' ~ ~ f~'S t37 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O to ~ rr O CT' ~n ~ a n ~ ov ~ ~ x 1 o ~ -t h's w y K O ' v w 0 v w rood v, g ~"~ 3 (D b O F-+ ~ O ~ w fD fD fx.+. ~ ~ ~ ~• ~ 00 n V V (~D rt R ,^ tr 1D v i co m 'z7 H H H N ~ V ~ v Q w Vl w H r ~ Q Z X 0 0 ~ O o 0 0 v ~ b ~ 'b w c. cr i o .. ~~ N ~-! ~ ~ 3 C'~ O f'! O ~ ~ ~ ~' ~ ~~ p :~ ;~ ~ V N O N f-' N ~ ~ W ~ -j fo. Z V 8~ / V H ff o Z a+ ~ ~~ ~~ v 1 Cb , QJ . '_' f ~i r G ~` G h . O O ~ N ~ O N p ~D N O O O ~ ~ b N ~ row ~ ~ b oN ~ ~ o ~ o ~' c "' ~ o ~ c7 w ~ H o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O vn, - ~ ~ o F-+ H 8 ~ C") O O ~ ~ O ppcr ~ ~ E N ~~ A ~ :Y N N ~~ ~'' , ~~ c z ~~ ~i • r~ N C ~y V ~ ~O ~ ~ ~ R'+ ~ ~ W ~ - ~O ~ ~ a ~~ " E ~ ~K~ -. r 0 z~ w ~ N ~ v ~ N ~ w ~ ~ 00 N ~p ~ ~ S ' HH Z M N• a -~,, ~ ~. ~ o ~ ~ °' o `O ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ w o °~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ b OD N ~ O ~ ~ N ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ O H NO p [~ N 3 i O ~ r~r ~ ~ ~ '~ O (~D r~S i~r l~9 v~i ~1. ~ Fr H V ~ N Z (D 5~ fT '~ ~ ~ CD r ~ ~ ~w ~ ~ °F ° `~ ~ v, w v ~j '~7 ~ tti ~ f H ~C ~~: F ~' C ~~ ~~ ~ N W ~ ~ N ~ N N F-+ O ~ 8 '~ H ~D M ~' M n N A V F-+ O~ ~D A n ~ ~ °` ~ ~ fY ~ ~' W N F-+ H O~ ~n I O I N N W V V ~ ~ ~ ~ !-~+ O~ W Fr. 0 V N O O N b G7 C A ~ ~' O N H R O C7 O F-+ O N~ ~+ C fD G (D a oo° a ~° z O a {/> W H QH G H QH G ~~ ~~ ~ a ~ ~ - ~~ •~ -I U O n L ~ n ~ i' ~ r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Ali d n -~ n T7 ~a N 1 ~ ~O n n ; ~ A ~ ~U ~ ~~~ Z ~ W ~ ~ p i ~ N o ~ > N ~' ~ - 0~ ~ '~' D O O ~ i n ~ ~ O -I Z i r i ~ N ~ ~~ ~ (~ O Z I - V C A di -r) G <p C O Ub ~U O U r ~" O ~ -C p~ < O -' ~ C ~ L N N !gyp ty ~ ~ ti 0 O l7 m O b~ C H c 0 m m a~ 0 3~~ 0~~6 ~ yo v c N ro ~ cic`~~~,ZO.3O D°ZNNmz~3~ ^~ r Z ~ w CD `~ '- 'o ~ ~ O ~ `-= U o T ~ ~ ~ ~n '~ ' ~ r ~ ,--x11 `~, TI ~ C O O C~ 2 N ', c n .. tJ C ,b p -{ o Q~~~ (~ o t' Z z'- 3 3 ~ pR•J~ O'"~ O~ OAcn~ Z~ ~ ~~-°-r ~'O y J0 ~ ~ c f. N Z ll -< ~`~ ~ . ~) ~ C ~ .A i G N m N~ Cp N 4 N ? C '~ D q ~ h] 3 ~` ~~ ~ m ?~ ~ ~ 4 W i s c1i H Z O 2 ~ fV ~ ~ ~ p c') -1 i ~ i~ ,~ ~ m ~~ r -{a v n ~ "~ 2 r' z ~ fl1 ~ ~ t1~ ~- ~ to _ f~ n ~N H ~, ~ f, ~ w ~ ~ Z ~ F o ~p H y ~^ (^ i c c N ~ _ U O ~ ~ Ri ~ N m ,O O A ~ 0 p ~ ~ ~ ~ ~{ ~ ~ L ~ ~~ N D ~ 7. 1 uco oaU ~ ~ ~'° ~ Z ~ b ~^ L ~ w ~ m J D ~ ~~ - y ~~ r y A~ D ~ m y o '~°m y °z ~m -1 ~ n _ 1 r i ~~ ,~- ~~ y U l m tr] o ,~ N A G I -U oo ~~ ~ M1 to w N .p N r '~ y 4 ~p 0a Q ~ QQu- -i ~ ~ U- ~n pO (U, G N O O ~ ~~ ~ ~ QA~ .P C~ r-~I U O0 0 00 ~ ~ G (, U' p p UO (~ 0 (~ ~ ~ C ~ ` , p CA °- O I ~ N O G v U (i C f~ $~ (~ O O ~, J Q O O 0 '"j H [_] _ 0 U C ~ ~ r~ ~ 0 ~ p ~n 0 ~ ~ ro 0 s' 0 ~ Q~ ~ c O v H O ~ ~ O v[i o G ~ o I ~~, W ~ ~ o ~ ~ p a G G I U Q o0 ••'~ V ,` N ~ tGT ~ O ~ --~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ `~ ~ ~ o m i i o I 00 o `° O ~ 0 0 o `° O o O ~ ~- ~ ~, ~, -i N m 1 •~0 ~ ' ~ ~ >' D 6' N O W~~ m W Z ~ u' ~ ~ .'7i N ~ ~ IV < ~ zNp ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ ' ~ ~ :v `n o ~ n ° O ~ ZN .p Zt.t<': ~' ~ A J 1 ~i ~ ~ a N~ ~ ~,~ p p z O b Z , J U ~`~p m ~ o "1 < Z N< v ~ ~ ~ 7C) ll p ~~ y`" d~ b~ ~ ,7 O D$ o~D . N N ~ ~ ~ b ~ o~ o• ~ Orr, i~3 ~i--3N= ~N~i 5 ~m,°;~.~0 N p oNGm~~~~ ~ b" N p n z W U a • OJ C A CA 7U ~' ~ w _ ~ a? ~ 70 -1 ~ ~ O C ~ i n O ~• O T~ 0 n ~ f ro _p J ~ N Q ~' C m n ~ ~ ~ ..n ~ ~ Cb i- r- ~ ~ 3 D ~ -1 •. ~ W O -i N ~ - - ~ 3 6 OD ~ 0 L ~ ^~ $ T O ~ w U, r- ~ N 6` ~ to r A N W -~ yr r r ~ L z -, ~ n ~n ~ D ~ •n ~. ~ O n O~ O aD f~ N n 1~>~ i (jS 3 C ~ Z x ~~ .. U t.(~ rn ~ H ~r ~ Z ~ o m A ° ,~ ~ fi ~ ~ ` ~ 1 Z ~ N cn _ H ~~ 0 m ~ ~ p~ L C N W Uu r U~ •~ C 70 n p ~' D G y, 2 ~ ~~ N 2 u N i ~i o Z ~ v c' 70 ~0 -i ~ ro g z m~ ~ m o ~ A b 1~ A 'p -1 ~ --~ " 70 J n c 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ D Z ~ ~ D L ~ R~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ L ~ -U of ~ 'Q ~{ A 'l1 ,o r 1 ~ y~ D N~ A u~~ D ~~ h D 6~ m cn ° c,~ p p N 6N r y r i r y t' y (7 H p G ~j t~ ~ ~ I ;J CA ~` ~~ W U` ~ O N O J~+ -'G W t''~ t'i ~ ° ° v $ d~$O 8 g$~ ~ 8 +Q R $ ~o g ~~° d t5 ~ -' N `~,1 C p ~ o m Q ~ N ~~ ~ ~ 8 O ~ O ~ ~ 9 H U Q H~ o ~ z ~ ~ 1 ~_ U ~ ~ O 9 ~ gcn ~u' w w o° o° 8 R J O Q ~ d O ~ ~ ~ ~~ N U, ~ N , r ~ ~ ~ G O ono o ~ o p O Q ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -~ ~ ~ ~, V `O Q D ~ c o 0 Q o 0 i ft's} /N r ~J l ~ 0 o' C n O n O tJ 7o n Ut (~ '~ C~ ~, ~' m (~ -zl 5 ~ L ~' ~ G ~ ~ O b' ~ ~ ~ ? ~ A ~ i 1 ~ tv W A ` (1 ~ 7p O ~ u -n ~ z d z ~ ~ g o ~ ~ c > -rt ~ ~ c rH u+ N ~ ~ b~ b ~ N a , 6' O o b r ~ O O i ~ N nnr ~ ~ ~ Q d ~cl N O L .o ~ > Y G I ~ .J L r --I 'i7 ~ ~ ~ rn ~ ~1 ~ ~ r _ Ti ~ rnv O ~ x ~ i ~ i n O ., _ - - .. 1 1 z . _ 3 .~ ~ Z (A n ~ ~ 3 ~ c Z ~~ ~ ~ ~ °i 3~ O "~-- ' Do ~ nod oor~loWcnG ~~oU ~ z. ~ p ° ~ ~~p N ~~~~~ i~ -~ t~'1 ~ O O y.' ~^ C -t ? Q ~ -~1 C O ~ A ~ (A 1 - s -1 CC -{ _ ~ -0 ~ ~o ,~ ? Q ~ ~ _ ~ O C a ..o O ~p r~ (v~ c .. ~ N ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ w 1~ -1 ~ z Wo ~ ~ U t`~` ~i 1 ~ 0 ~ N ' ~ N 7[7 ~- ' i ~ j- `~ p d ii ~ t~ l Q -- O c m ~ Cj7 u ` a ~~~~ ~' U~ U R i ~ N Z N Z n p Z Z D '" ~ '~ ~ n r 1 - ~. N G. C n7 D ~ ~. ^ ' n 700 ~ 7C1 ' N f*~ 70 ~ ~ ~ N ~, rd L = ~ ~ q '~ a o ~p ~ ii ~ v 1 -F' J ~' ~ ~ ~ ~-p{ z IL ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ V• r '~ ~ O N ~ ~ m O -- P ~ ~ -~ y ~~~ ~m Taro ~ ~~ ~ ~ .~ ~ q ~ y~ ~ y~ ~ N~ " y F n D~ ~r ~ U ~' ~ ~ O .o o p '~ ~ ~ I CO OC I ( O ~ I pp~ ~ g d O~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ p ~` ''~ y O O U c 4 (: O O 8 O S O ~ C O p $ O O C d ~ ~ I ~ I - I ~b ~ ~ G Q o ~ O p o~ H O H [ O fn z N ~ lJ ~ ~ V Q ~ f'~ t0 ~~ p Q o O ~ ~ g g 0 J ~ ~ G ~ O ~ ~~ ~ C ~ ~ • -P Ut Q S ~ O O O ~ O U ~ p ~o C ~ p ~ o ~ ~ ~ N ~ N to 0 8 ~ .~ _ ~ w ~~ • - ~ o ~ C1 p h A ~ ~~ ;' r z t~ -0 ~ n~ N L n S N Z~ _~ S o ~ ~ ~ I n A ~ ~ ~ ~~ o~ -i 1 8~ A 1? Iv z n W z ~ 3~ Z -I ~ ~° lh ~~ ~ ~ ~ t A tNV ~ ~ ~ Z ~ y J W m ' A W A n A W b ° ~ 0 bZ ~~ c o o y w ~ J Z 1 ~~r1 y f] Tt ~ b ~ O p D ~ o ~ ~ a z ~ i v ~o ~t v C" ~ r~ vDi tl~ ~ vD C O C .~ ~ b~ p~- O ~ 2 b N D p N ~ , ~ N O n p ~ XIS c; J ~ nC~~-0 Ia oil N r STIN ~ r~ ~V m ~ ~ ~ ar C ~, ~ ~ m z I ~ ~ 3 1 2..3 (p rna ~ GU z z°3 b\G r- T1w ~ ro-1~1- n"'c~~ c ~ 0 7v ' c ~- ~ ~ ~ ~ I z m o "' -- 3 c~ ? - ~ N ra ; O ~ ~1 ~0'- 2=~,dO L i ~0 ~ c p.. 1 .~ 1~j - O U Z _. 3 va o Z ~ ~ v1 K t' lr' i ~ _~ '" i~ ~i = i Q L '~ ~U 0 A t :1 70 1 C ~ 2 C A~ 1 i I N N c' ~ -~, • to ~~ = tJ+E ~ C • ~ ; f ~ a i N i y 70 C Z r 'd ~U ,i G i p -' a U ~, N C c p- .A. (JO o n o O c r d A O y z- i ~^ ~ C _ C ~~N 1 (" U O AO _ G~ n (' r.~i ~ ~ ~ ~! 1 ~ ~ ~ 1 t, U7 N -J 1 ~ ~ v 1 D d D -~ O f~ ~ J ~ C C N m - O [z] ~ ~~ 1 N 7 ~ ~ ~+ ~ N u ~ ro ~~ ~_ ~ J H c w "~ O R ~ -- p z ~ A N c L D r N n ~o ~ n -a --~ ~ 'V z~ m °~ t~ t:, c Z~ ~; o~ ~ A U of o~ ro 1 S~~ n ~ y ~ y ~ 1'. y D Ulna ~~R'~ N~m~~ Lim °~ ~A~ ~ o~-p t~ N a ~ y ~ y ~ ~ y ~. ~ 7~ ~ f y~•n y o t> ~ J O (~p `n t - - appp tT Ut _ N J _ ~ _ _ A H cy tJ ~ o O O ~ O U ~ O p tv N N lNl, O CO ~ W O O N W A N -O W S- N ~I O C U O ,~ o G o O ih p -.i N ~ C ~j ~ ~ Cn ~~ ~~°Q ~~~8 g°~o ~°~ ~QO ~ goo gQo ~ ~~~ yd C ~ 0 0 0 ~ o o Oc ~ ~ ` ' ~ yo H ~ O Cn z ~ ~ ~n °' d ~ J ~'' ~ ~° o ~ ~ ~ ~ ° ~ ° ~ _~ 'O N G o U C 0 O ~ o0 ~ b _,y J' t N N w ~ ~ G O ( U J ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ p 8 • ° s ~ Q ~ o lra ~` O A ~ ~ 3 n ~ 1 ~ O C ~ ~ 2 a < Z b n U ro V D o ~ rn ~ i ~ ~ C x _ r .~ C~27 N y (:. N L ~ ~ C1 '~7 H ~ b cA ~ CA o c +~ ~ z 2 N C t~ A O C P D ~ ~m y y C7 H ~ ~ O N ' ~~' y ~ [O U ~ C Q ~. ro o~ C a~ ~ H O H ~ O C!] z ~o J ~ ~ 4 ~ ~ O V I ,~ I F... N ~ I 8 I °° F-~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~D ~ ~ ~ U ~ ° 0 a c~ ~- O O > O v O- 6 U -~ ~~ '~ O n ~ v n -P v ~ tr v~ Z p b n D~ o ~n n} ~ n ~, (j ~ ~ DU _i ~ ° W c 't' _ " W A z 1 L D N Z D n~ L C L W Q ` ~~~ z N X 'I D i D 1 ~{ D ~ a O Z -I a Z L J z~ r N j< T~ ,N D ro p ~~ (~J O i ~ D~ ~~ P O Z 1 O~ D 1 b ~~ y .D i 1 ~ o~ b~ ~ `^ ~y n ~c o~ b~ b L b ~^ D A D ' ~ ~ ~ ~ z, ~~ ~ 1 _ ~~o ~~ Q n~ W C ~~ tr 6` 1 p O N y m O ~0 Gi ~ ~~" ~ f ~ H `1 ~ "' 'Q 1 n ~ '" n ~ ~ x1 2 ~ 0 ~ '- N 0 A H ~ ~ ~ th t ~-{ ; -ice L m G i P;~ ~ i ~ m ~ V Z .~ r o~ (~ m ~ h ~ U n ~ tli m ~ ~ x ~ ~ ~ x f ~ m ;1 ~ 1 i.. 3. ~ i cA~ i D N+ w .. f: i ~„ .r ~ Z -~ y H ~ v W C ~ - 70 IJt 3 x . m'~o ~ to ~ ~ A ~ ~ ~ ~_~ 0~ ~ ~ 3 ;' r n A i ~ ~ If e U » 7p a R G a o y 1 D .7 ~` fi 'Q ~ N ~ N n H '° ~ ~ 7~° ~ ~ ~ + ein (~ ~ ~ C R ~0 c n ~ m ~ L y ~ E "~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Z 1 - y. 1 = ,f, n r-~ ~ ., c G W A J~ rn c, ~ Z~ c O ti L y O R I ~ i I W ~ ^~ ~ -y4 m Tl a n, A z ~ ~ ~ OJ ~ ~ ~ '~ ~ ~ iF D 6 ? C. g - o -~_ o a N ~ A ~~ ~ y to ~ ~ O N n N ~ ~ i n A ~ y r ~^ ~ r N ,n N r y r - ti r -i n H cn v. ( I U N N 0~ v~ ~` th v. W , I _ O v ~ ~ ~ ~ O g C p C R 0 0 O C ~ R~ p° y C 0 6 D ~ ~ o ~i I I I I (~ C O o ~ I I ~ o~ I I t ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~c I ~ H O H ~ z fn c~ In ~ G ~ o u~ ~ U ~ p ~ O ~ ~ ~ O C C ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 v • ~ N N N to ~o ~' ~' C o0 C ~ s • ~ t~l F-+ G ~ V ~ ' U I C ~ N r-~ O ~ i 0 N ~ C c G ~ 0 ~o O ~' i o ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ E n w , ~ N ~ ~ ~ o t~ z b - ~ ~ g v~ Z ~ ~ o ~, ~ ~ N ~° ° ~ ~ p ~0 l1J ~ r ,, ~n N tR O W ~ z i ~ ~ n. " ~ U1 d N y r ~, 'i < ~ n ~ ~ ~ ~~ A ~ ro n C 1 ~ '"3 H ° z 'i ce C ~~ V ~` Ilc tV N 0 N N N Q N N O N N N ~0 N N N 0 OQ N L ~ m v ~ 7 ~ ~ n ry-i N N lw U 0 t1~ ~ ~ p ~ I H H ~ I ~ C ~ d p O C ro I ~ o ~ p ~c I H I O H ~ O fn z lJ1 ~ 0 00 8 °' 00 • ~ N v ~ ' i 0 0 i