HomeMy WebLinkAbout6/9/1987 - Regularo~ PoaN ~F
~.
. p
° Cn~r~t~t~ ~~ ~~ar~~~a~~
,~ ~
18 ~ 88
sFsQU1CENTENN~P~
ABcauti~ulBcginniag ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
ACTION AGENDA
JUNE 9, 1987
Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meeting. Regular
meetings are held on the second Tuesday of the month at 2:00 p.m., and
the fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public Hearings will be heard at 7:00
p.m on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this
schedule will be announced. A PUBLIC HEARING HAS BEEN SCHEDOLED FOR
THE AFTERNOON SESSION.
A. OPENING CEREMONIES (2:00 P.M.)
1. Roll Call.
2. Invocation: The Reverend William P. Warnock
Vinton Baptist Church
3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag.
B. WORK SESSION ON DRAINAGE
ECH REQUESTED BOARD CONCURRENCE TO PROCEED WITH DRAINAGE PROGRAM, FIIND
DRAINAGE CREW AND PROCEED WITH NECESSARY CHANGES TO ORDINANCES.
C. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS
D. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA
ITEMS.
E. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS AND AWARDS
F. NEW BUSINESS
1. Renewal of the Blue Cross-Blue Shield Contract for the
1987/88 Fiscal Year.
BLJ/AHB- URC
HCN REQUESTED STAFF REPORT ON ALTERNATIVE HEALTH CARE PLANS IN SIX
MONTHS
2. Presentation on Sanitary Sewer
Evaluation/Rehabilitation Program (SSE/R)
3. Request for approval to Transfer $4,000 park bond funds
for ballfields behind the new William Byrd Junior High
School.
HCN/ABH - URC
4. Approval of a Resolution Expressing Concern with Senate
Bill 538.
NO_ACTION. ASKED TWG TO KEEP THE BOARD ADVISED. ON SENATE HOUSE BILL
538.
5. Presentation of the Health Department Six-Year. Plan for
Roanoke County.
PRESENTED BY DR. MARGARET HAGEN
C. Report on Safe and Effective Ways of Controlling
Mosquitoes.
HCN/SAM TO REFER QUESTIONS AND COMPLAINTS TO THE HEALTH DEPT.
URC
G. REQUEST FOR WORK SESSIONS
SAM REQUESTED WORK SESSION ON STREET LIGHT STUDY FOR JULY 14, 1987
H. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS
I. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES
1. Ordinance authorizing the conveyance of a Drainage
Easement, Barrens Village
HCN/AHB - URC
2ND READING - 6/23/87
2. Ordinance amending Chapter 18, "Sewers and Sewage
Disposal" concerning the installation of Septic
Tanks, requiring a permit and prescribing fees for
the issuance of same.
BLJ/HCN - URC
2ND READING - 6/23/87
2
..
J. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES
1. Ordinance amending Section 12-28 of the Roanoke
County Code to increase the annual license tax on
motor vehicles.
HCH/AHB - URC
2. Ordinance authorizing the Acquisition of Easements for
the 1987-88 Replacement/Improvement Water Projects.
BLJ/LG - URC
3, Ordinance to increase the Salaries of Members of the
Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, pursuant to
Section 14.1-46.01:1.
AHB/SAM - URC
4. Ordinance authorizing the Vacation and Relocation of a
portion of a water line easement, Ozanich Property.
AHB/LG - URC
5. Ordinance authorizing the County Administrator to
accept the donation or dedication of Utility and
Right-of-Way Easements and Improvements therein.
BLJ/LG - URC
6. Ordinance authorizing the Purchase of a Water Storage
Reservoir Site.
LG/AHB - URC
R. PUBLIC HEARINGS
687-1 Public Hearing and Resolution pursuant to Section
15.1-238(e) authorizing condemnation and right-of-entry
for Hollins Community Development Project road
improvements along State Route 648.
MR. STUARTS 'S FAIR MARKET VALUE WAS INCREASED TO $300, AND MR. STUART
REFUSED SETTLEMENT. MR. BUTLER AGREED TO ACCEPT $6,300. THE
HAYNESWORTHS WERE NOT PRESENT.
BLJ MOVED TO REMOVE THE BUTLERS FROM CONDEMNATION PROCEEDINGS, AND
CONDEMNATION ACTION BE INSTIGATED AGAINST THE STUARTS AND
HAYNESWORTH'S. MOTION SECONDED BY HCN
AYES - LG, SAM, HCN, BLJ
ABSENT - ABH
L. APPOINTMENTS
3
1. Fifth Planning District Commission.
HCN NOMINATED BOB L. JOHNSON TO ANOTHER THREE-YEAR TERM AS
ELECTED REPRESENTATIVE - TERM TO EXPIRE 6/30/90
2. Planning Commission
LG NOMINATED MICHAEL J. GORDON TO UNEXPIRED TERM OF LEE EDDY,
REPRESENTING THE WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT. TERM TO
EXPIRE 12/31/88.
3. Recreation Commission.
LG NOMINATED WILLIAM M. SKELTON, JR. TO THREE YEAR TERM,
REPRESENTING WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT. TERM TO EXPIRE
6/30/90.
AHB NOMINATED MICHAEL LAZZURI TO ANOTHER THREE-YEAR TERM, AS AN
AT-LARGE MEMBER. TERM TO EXPIRE 6/30/90.
4. Virginia Western Community College Board
HCN NOMINATED STEPHEN MUSSELWHITE TO ANOTHER FOUR-YEAR TERM.
TERM TO EXPIRE 6/30/91.
M. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS
NICKENS: (1) REQUESTED STAFF TO REDUCE COMP TIME EARNED, AND
INVESTIGATE REASONS FOR SICK LEAVE BY EMPLOYEES. (2) SUGGESTED
THAT A LETTER BE SENT TO VDOT THANKING THEM FOR INSTALLING
"CAUTION" SIGNS ON ROUTE 24 UNTIL A TRAFFIC LIGHT IS INSTALLED.
N. CONSENT AGENDA
ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE
CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WILL BE
ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED
BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE
REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED
SEPARATELY.
AHB REQUESTED TO HAVE ITEM N-2 REMOVED FOR A SEPARATE VOTE SO
HE MAY ABSTAIN.
BLJ/LG TO APPROVE WITH ITEM N-2 REMOVED - UW
1. Minutes of Meetings - April 28, 1987, May 12, 1987
2. Authorization to vacate and relocate a Sanitary
Sewer Easement in Branderwood Section #3.
4
{..,
... • y <~,
SAM/LG TO APPROVE
AYES - LG, SAM, HCN, BLJ
ABSTAIN - AHB
3. Notification from the Va. Department of
Transportation of the addition of Route 1916 from
Route 1832 to a south cul-de-sac and Route 1917
from Route 1916 to a southeast cul-de-sac into the
Secondary System.
4. Request for a Fireworks Display Permit from Hills
Department Store.
5. Approval of Resolution of Support for the
Blue Ridge Parkway "DEDICATION 87" Project.
6. Request for acceptance into the Secondary System
for the following Roads:
a. 0.15 miles of Beavers Lane and 0.13 miles of
Elizabeth Drive.
b. 0.17 miles of Wing Commander Drive and 0.14
miles of Grape Tree Lane.
c. 0.05 miles of Shadow Lane
d. 0.18 miles of Hill Drive
e. 0.18 miles of Indian Hill Drive
f. 0.26 miles of Airpoint Drive and 0.26 miles
of Airpoint Road.
g. 0.56 miles of Lakemont Drive
h. 0.04 miles of Memory Lane
i. Streets of LaBellevue Subdivision including
Forest Oak Drive, Coachman Circle, Coachman
Drive and Summit Ridge Road.
7. Acceptance of Sewer Facilities for Allred
Chevrolet
8. Approval to Request matching funds from the Va.
Department of Transportation for Industrial Access
Road Improvements to Bolling Steel.
0. CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS
P. REPORTS
1. Youth Haven II Status Report
RECEIVED AND FILED
5:45 P.M. - 5 MINUTE RECESS
5
Q. EXECUTIVE SESSION pursuant to the Code of Virginia
2.1-344 (a).
NO EXECUTIVE SESSION WAS HELD
R. ADJOURNMENT AT 6:05 P.M.
6
O~ POANp~.~
~ , ~ A /r
~~
~s ~~ as
SFSQUICENTENN~P~ ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
A Bcauti~ul8cginning
AGENDA
JUNE 9, 1987
Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meeting. Regular
meetings are held on the second Tuesday of the month at 2:00 p.m., and
the fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public Hearings will be heard at 7:00
p.m on the foubehannounced.f AaPUBLICtHEARDNG1HASoBEENrSCHEDULED FOR
schedule will
THE AFTERNOON SESSION.
A. OPENING CEREMONIES (2:00 P.M.)
1. Roll Call.
2. Invocation: The Reverend William P. Warnock
Vinton Baptist Church
3, Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag.
B. WORK SESSION ON DRAINAGE
C. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS
D. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA
ITEMS.
E. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS AND AWARDS
F. NEW BUSINESS
1. Renewal of the Blue Cross-Blue Shield Contract for the
1987/88 Fiscal Year.
2, Presentation on Sanitary Sewer
Evaluation/Rehabilitation Program (SSE/R)
3. Request for approval to Transfer $4,000 park bond funds
for ballfields behind the new William Byrd Junior High
School.
4, Approval of a Resolution Expressing Concern with Senate
Bill 538.
5, Presentation of the Health Department Six-Year Plan for
Roanoke County.
g. Report on Safe and Effective Ways of Controlling
Mosquitoes.
G. REQUEST FOR WORK SESSIONS
H. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS
I. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES
1. Ordinance authorizing the conveyance of a Drainage
Easement, Barrens Village
2. Ordinance amending Chapter 18, "Sewers and Sewage
Disposal" concerning the installation of Septic
Tanks, requiring a permit and prescribing fees for
the issuance of same.
J. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES
1. Ordinance amending Section 12-28 of the Roanoke
County Code to increase the annual license tax on
motor vehicles.
2. Ordinance authorizing the Acquisition of Easements for
the 1987-88 Replacement/Improvement Water Projects.
3. Ordinance to increase the Salaries of Members of the
Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, pursuant to
Section 14.1-46.01:1.
4. Ordinance authorizing the Vacation and Relocation of a
portion of a water line easement, Ozanich Property.
5, Ordinance authorizing the County Administrator to
accept the donation or dedication of Utility and
Right-of-Way Easements and Improvements therein.
6. Ordinance authorizing the Purchase of a Water Storage
Reservoir Site.
K. PUBLIC HEARINGS
2
687-1 Public Hearing and Resolution pursuant to Section
15.1-238(e) authorizing condemnation and right-of-entry
for Hollins Community Development Project road
improvements along State Route 648.
L. APPOINTMENTS
1. Fifth Planning District Commission.
2. Planning Commission
3. Recreation Commission.
4. Virginia Western Community College Board.
bI. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS
N. CONSENT AGENDA
ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE
CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WILL BE
ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED
BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE
REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED
SEPARATELY.
1. Minutes of Meetings - April 28, 1987, May 12, 1987
2. Authorization to vacate and relocate a Sanitary
Sewer Easement in Branderwood Section #3.
3. Notification from the Va. Department of
Transportation of the addition of Route 1916 from
Route 1832 to a south cul-de-sac and Route 1917
from Route 1916 to a southeast cul-de-sac into the
Secondary System.
4. Request for a Fireworks Display Permit from Hills
Department Store.
5. Approval of Resolution of Support for the
Blue Ridge Parkway "DEDICATION 87" Project.
6. Request for acceptance into the Secondary System
for the following Roads:
a. 0.15 miles of Beavers Lane and 0.13 miles of
Elizabeth Drive.
3
b. 0.17 miles of Wing Commander Drive and 0.14
miles of Grape Tree Lane.
c. 0.05 miles of Shadow Lane
d. 0.18 miles of Hill Drive
e, 0.18 miles of Indian Hill Drive
int Drive and 0.26 miles
i
f
f. 0.26 miles rpo
A
o
of Airpoin t Road.
g, 0.56 miles of Lakemont Drive
h.
i 0.04 miles
Streets of of Memory Lane
LaBellevue Subdivision including
. Forest Oak Drive, Coachman Circle, Coachman
Drive and Summit Ridge Road.
'7, Acceptance of Sewer Facilities for Allred
Chevrolet.
g, Approval to Request matching funds from the Va.
Department of Transportation for Industrial Access
Road Improvements to Bolling Steel.
0, CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS
p. REPORTS
1. Youth Haven II Status Report
Q. EXECUTIVE SESSION pursuant to the Code of Virginia
2.1-344 (a).
R. ADJOURNMENT
4
BOARD WORK SESSION ON DRAINAGE
I. BACKGROUND
On May 26, staff presented a report to the Board of
Supervisors on drainage in Roanoke County. This report
outlined maintenance responsibilities, applicable
regulations, financial options and possible solutions. In
order to consider certain issues in greater detail, the
Board requested a work session for the June 9 meeting.
II. SHORT TERM SOLUTIONS
As outlined in the report, the County should pursue several
short term solutions as outlined below:
A. Adopt VDOT Drainage Manual
1. Prepare ordinance for first reading on June 23rd.
B. Reviselainsdnot1recognizedebyothenFederalvlnsurancein
f loodp
Administration (F.I.A.)
1. Prepare revision to the Roanoke County Zoning
Ordinance for review by the Planning Commission in
July. the Board of
2. Present revision for first reading by
Supervisors at the first meeting in August.
C. Improve Inspection Process
Staff will review inspection process and report to
Board in September on recommendations for inspection
changes, staffing requirement, and funding needs.
D. Develop and adopt Roanoke Count Construction Standards
for drainage. Staff has met with oca Home Builders,
Engineers and Contractors, a committee is to be
established to consider these items in detail to report
to the Board of Supervisors in January, 1988.
E. Develop an information program to inform citizens of
each parties responsibilities, DOs and DON'Ts concern-
ing drainage ways and where complaints should be
directed.
III. LONG TERM SOLUTION
In order for Roanoke County to develop and fund Watershed
Plans and a Drainage Program, staff will review various
options, one of which would be forming a committee, to
develop a long term workable drainage program which would
include methods of providing a permanent funding source.
IV. CURRENT 1986-87 DRAINAGE PROGRAM
As with any new program, Roanoke County's first year with
the drainage crew has had its start up problems. But it has
provided some response and improvements to several signifi-
cant drainage problems.
During this year, we have completed eight (8) projects with
the drainage crew, completed plans for three (3) contract
projects and have several other projects, in the planning
phase. These items are outlined for your review.
A. Completed Projects
1) Cresthill Drive/Kirkwood Drive
Improvements to Mudlick Creek to improve stream
characteristics.
2 ) Hummingbird Lane
Channel improvement to alleviate standing water and
eroding banks.
3) Penn Forest Boulevard
Replaced collapsed storm sewer that was causing
property and residential flooding.
4) Route 116 Sinkhole (Jae Valley Road and Sunnyvale
Road). Cleared sinkhole of debris and provided
drainage facilities to remove a public nuisance.
5) South Roselawn Road
Regraded and stabilize a badly eroding ditchline
that had become a safety hazard.
6) Arcturus Drive and White Dove Drive.
Cleared a storm sewer of debris that was causing
property and residential flooding. In addition, a
manhole was installed to facilitate future cleanout
efforts.
7) Route 897 (Crystal Creek Road)
Relocated a culvert under Route 897 and relocated
the receiving channel to combat property and
residential flooding.
8) Eastdale Circle
In order to alleviate a developing sinkhole, County
grouted exposed joints within the storm sewer.
B. Contract Projects:
Staff has prepared plans for Contract Projects for the
following projects.
1) Roanoke County Service Center (Funded)
2) Route 11/460 Sinkhole (Funded)
3) Sierra/Fenwick Sinkhole (Not funded)
C. Other Projects
Staff had previous plans to complete several additional
projec-ts in the near future.
1) Old Pinkard Court School
Upgrade existing open-channel through the property.
2) Kentland/Willowlawn/South Park
County crew previously cleaned out the storm sewers
of debris. The drainage facilities along South Park
Circle were proposed for improvements.
3) The attached Appendix A is a summary of major
drainage concerns, which the Engineering Department
is aware of at the present time.
D. Overview
While the County Drainage Crew has had its growing
pains this year, we can still consider this year a
success. Unlike contract work, we are able to be more
responsive to emergency conditions. However, the small
number of people and limited equipment capabilities
tends to lengthen the completion time for each project.
V. ORLANDO/PALM VALLEY/VERNDALE
As outlined in the May 26 Report, Roanoke County can pursue
the following options for improving the drainage situation
in the Orlando/Palm Valley area:
A. Prepare plans for bidding the reconstruction of the
drainage facilities that originate from Williamson Road.
(Construction to begin by September). Also pursue the
possibility of cost sharing between Roanoke City,
Roanoke County and the Virginia Department of Transpor-
tation.
B. Begin clearing the streambanks of Carvins Creek with-
in late fall and early winter.
C. Revise the Roanoke County Secondary Highway Six Year
Construction Plan in September, 1987 to include
improvements to the bridge across Orlando Avenue.
(Actual construction would begin in four (4) to five
(5) years.
D. Work in conjunction with VDOT to install a storm sewer
to drain the sinkhole between Tampa Drive and Return
Road. Since preliminary plans have been developed,
this project could begin by early fall.
VI.
KENTLAND/SOUTH PARK/WILLOWLAWN
p,, Work with VDOT on improving the existing storm sewer
system in Kentland Drive. These improvements
consisting of the following could be completed within
six (6) months:
1. Provide a trash rack at the beginning of the storm
sewer system.
2. Install manholes on the eighteen (18) inch storm
sewer, if the system is needed and functional.
3. Upgrade deficient manholes and inlets.
4. Grout exposed joints within the storm sewer.
5. Upgrade the existing 24 inch storm sewer under
Willowlawn.
g. Improve the streambanks of Mudlick Creek in late fall
or early winter.
C. Upgrade the existing storm sewer from South Park Circle
to Mudlick Creek by early fall using contract or County
forces.
VII. SUMMARY
During FY87-88 a drainage program can be continued if
proposed funding of $200,000 is provided. These funds
would be used to:
1) Fund drainage improvements in Palm Va11000and
Willowlawn Area for approximately $145,
2) Fund the drainage crew which will provide continu-
ing maintenance and minor improvements along drain-
age easements and drainage ways. The crew would be
available to respond to emergency situations.
3) Proceed with needed ordinances and revisions of
County requirements to strengthen review and
inspection process on new development.
4) Develop alternatives for a complete drainage
program and start discussions with all Valley
Governments on the potential for a Regional Water-
shed Plan and Drainage Program.
5) Develop five (5) year improvement program to
consider other priorities in the County and also
address County participation for drainage improve-
ments in approved VDOT projects.
APPENDIX A
MAJOR DRAINAGE CONCERNS
Andrew Lewis Place ($100,000)
This subdivision includes three (3) sinkfloodingat
cause residential, roadway and property
Pinkard Court ($75,000)
The total lack of drainage facilities in this
subdivision results in residential and highway
flooding.
Sierra/Fenwick Sinkhole ($70,000 erty that
A deep sinkhole on county owned p op
contributes to flooding in two (2) adjacent residences.
County staff has prepared plans for this project.
Nelms Lane Sinkhole ($150,000)
A sinkhole near Williamson Road within the right of way
of Nelms Lane that contributes to residential flooding.
This project is in the present Secondary Highway Six
Year Construction Plan.
Castle Rock Road ($50,000)
Several property owners have filled in a natural
watercourse without providing alternate drainage
facilities, thereby creating three (3) manmade
sinkholes. These sinkholes result in property and
roadway flooding.
Bowers and Vauxhall ($50,000)
The drainage channel downstream of Bowers and Vauxhall
in the Windsor West Subdivision has eroded over the
last 15 years from a two (2) foot deep ditch to a ten
(10) foot deep ravine. This erosion has also exposed
several sewer and water lines.
Verndale Sinkholes ($125,000)
In the vicinity of Verndale Road and Plantation,
several natural sinkholes contribute to residential and
property flooding.
Merriman/Ranchcrest ($100,000)
The limited capacities of the main drainage channel and
culverts result in property and residential flooding.
Meadowlark/Tanglewood/Hummingbird ($50,000)
The limited capacities of the drainage channels and
culverts result in property and residential flooding.
Overbill Trail ($30,000)
Poor overlot grading for several residential lots has
contributed to residential and property flooding.
Embassy Drive ($100,000)
The limited capacities in drainage channels and
facilities in the Montclair Subdivision have
contributed to property, residential and roadway
flooding.
Winter Park Drive ($40,000)
The lack of adequate capacity of the culvert under
Winter Park Drive in the North Lakes Subdivision has
resulted in property and roadway flooding.
Others, Need for Community Meetings
Since no one has formally compiled a list of drainage
problems, the County staff need to conduct Community
Meetings in order to receive citizen imput.
A-6987-1
ITEM NUMBER ~~/
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMIN198RATION CENTER
IN ROANOKE, VA., ON TUESDAY, JUNE 9,
MEETING DATE: June 9, 1987
SUBJECT: Renewal of the Blue Cross/Blue Shield Contract for the
1987-88 fiscal year.
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S C/OMMENTS: ~~~ ,
U~~ ~ ~~~~ G~;~
Cetiv2tiR.c c,~r~.
4
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The Board °ld Contract wsilla expirel ont Jun et 30 cu1987t. Bllt
Cross/Blue Shie
should also be noted that our contract contains a renewal option
clause which may be exercised by the County.
During the past several years, the County has implemented
several cost containment features within our insurance program
and the projected results for the current fiscal year indicate
that the utilization of the plan has stabilized and that the
employees are using the health insurance program judiciously.
After studying the various funding alternatives available to
the County through Blue Cross/Blue Shield, staff recommends that
the County Administrator be authorized to sign the renewal option
for the 1987-88 fiscal year with two minor amendments, The first
changes the funding mechanism from a retrospectiuiredschange
program to a 110% aggregate stop loss program (a req
in the funding mechanism to protect the financial interest of the
County), and the second is the implementation of a managed care
program in lieu of the preadmission review provision within our
existing contract,
The County will continue to explore alternative options
which may become available such as HMO programs, consolidating
our health insurance program with that of rivatehsectortat~ the
consideration of alternatives from the p
appropriate time.
FISCAL IMPACT:
~/
Staff recommends that the cost to the employee be maintained
at the same level as that of the 1986-87 contract, which is $6.00
per month for employee only coverage and $82.66 per month for
family coverage. The County pays $42.00 per month towards either
of the contracts in addition to this amount. $50,000 has been
included in the 1987-88 budget to offset deficits incurred in
next year's program. While the fourth quarter results for
1986-87 are not tabulated, it appears that the projected plan
costs will be on target with the premium collected.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the County Administrator be authorized
to execute the necessary documents to exercise the renewal option
on behalf of the County, and to use funds from next year's budget
if necessary.
SUBMITTED BY:
~j ~ J
ohn M. Chamblis Jr.
Assistant Administrator
Approved (X)
Denied ( )
Received ( )
Referred
To
APPROVED:
Elmer C. Ho e
County Administrator
ACTION
Motion by: BLJ/AHB to approve
staff recommen atlon
VOTE
No Yes Abs
Brittle X
Garrett X
Johnson X
McGraw X
Nickens X
cc: File
John Chambliss
Keith Cook
Reta Busher
ITEM NUMBER
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF gHROANORE COUNTYEADMINISTRATIONNCENTER
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT T8
MEETING DATE: June 9, 1987
SUBJECT: Presentation on ganitary Sewerram (SSE/R)
Evaluation/Rehabilitation Prog
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
See attached report.
SUBMITTED BY:
~~;~
Cliff rd Craig
Director of Utilities
APPROVED:
~,
Elmer C. Ho ge
County Administrator
------ VOTE
- ACTION No yes Abs
Approved ( ) Motion by: Brittle
Denied ( ) Garrett
Received ( ) Johnson
Referred McGraw
to Nickens
REPORT ON SANITARY SEWER EVp,SEARION/REHABILITATION PROGRAM
S /
Background
The Sanitary Sewer Evaluation/Rehabilitatio~o(ram/t)oPreduce
was started in October, 1986, as an on-going p g
sanitary sewer sys-
the infiltration/inflow (I/I) into the County defects in the
roblems are partially caused by ro er
tem. The I/I p stem and partially the result of imp p
County's public sewer sY ortant to correct these problems
house connections. It is imp ned to carry storm water.
because sanitary sewers are not desig e re-
Introduction of storm water sa and higheretreatmentscostsrg ,
suiting in overflows, backup ,
s to reduce I/I in
The Utility Department is taking step
sewer lines, documenting the defects,
public sewers by televising
and correcting the problems. Most defects can be c thec~od nts
base by grouting and sealing
ing the televising p
they more serious problems must beerscare erehabilitatedep n ran
O ublic sew
or replaced. Once the p ro er house
area, we will be expecting homeowners to correct imp P
connections.
lementing the SSE/R program in a par-
The priorities for imp of recurrence and
ticular sewershed are based on the frequency
the severity of sewer backups in thataaia~ge Pisolated storm has
amount of backup experienced during in which the program will
little effect on raising the priority
be conducted in a particular area. This is truenormalsrainfall
areas that experience problems during for
are so many the I/I
as well as the large nselthe SSE/R priority rating using I
instance, did not cha g
and surcharge factors.
Scher e rior to
The SSE/R program is based on completion of an area P of
starting work in the next aretart d ineawnew areas whilevthe reha-
the evaluation phase being s revious area. Since
bilitation phase is being completed in the p
here is no way to know how much rehabilitationlis c and ucteda
t
until the actual sewer evaluation articular area is relative
any time schedule established for a p
onl Only estimates can be made toneataaTticularaarearu t 1 suc h
Y
which the SSE/R will be conducted
ime that an accurate time frame can be made for completion of
t
the SSE/R in the current area.
sewershed sub-area priority for the SSE/R pro-
The existing
gram and a rely Ve time schedule is as follows:
Fz
1. Back Creek Sewershed
a, Penn Forest area so~iveoandTMeadowlark Road1VStartedn
between Chaparral D 1987.
October, 1986. Estimated completion is September,
2.
Murray Run Sewershed
a. Green Valley sub-area--Scheduled1988begin
Estimated completion is August,
by July, 1987.
3.
Mud Lick Sewershed--Anticipated to start ray
Estimated completion, 1994.
a. Castle Rock Submain
b. Colonial Avenue to Brambleton Avenue
c, Southwoods Sub-area
d, Nottingham Hills to Cresthill
e, Sugarloaf Estates to Cresthill
f. Sugarloaf Mountain Road to Route 419
g, Other areas as flow monitoring indicates
Current Status
The first SSE/R work was started in the Back Creek se The
shed, Penn Forest sub-area. Tn1Meadowlarkaand Chaparralf This
Forest" Subdivision and bhtwand ten inch sewer line.
area has eight miles of eig
The following work has been accomplished:
1. All sewer lines htvsewernlineaintersectioneto]determine areas
2, Flow monitoring a
of excessive I/I. rior to grouting.
3, 7,000 feet of sewer rodded to remove roots p
4. Six miles of sewer line oor conditionehasdbeenTsealed by
5. Four miles of sewer in p
pressure grout. sealing and rebuilding
6. Manholes have been repaired by laced.
inverts.
7, Nine section of sewer and three laterals have been re
leted by SSE/R crew:
Work which remains to be comp
1. Sealing of sewer on Chaparral Drive after the school year is
finished. 200 linear feet of broken sewer by
2. Replace approximately
contract due to excessiliedetohMeadowlark sewer line.
3, Root growth control app
4, Foundation inspection by water injection and dye test of al
homes in areas with poor drainage and where I/I has been
detected by TV inspection. homeowner and
5, Require repairure repaipsrhaveebeennmadeion(ibe• Disconnect
re-test to ins p sewer, disconnect foundation
areaway drains from sanitaryrepair/replace leaking laterals,
drains from sanitary sewer, um connections in basements
disconnect floor drains or sump p P
that indicate wall or floor leakage.)
June, 1988.
6. Continue monthly flushing schedule for sewer line on ~- =;~'~
Tanglewood Drive.
The rehabilitation work within the public sewer of the Penn
Forest sub-area is anticipated to be completed by August 1987.
The time required for the homeowners to make corrections to their
sewers will depend on the nature of the problems discovered.
However, it is anticipated that they would be given a maximum of
six months to correct their problems.
At the time of the last two storms, well over 80~ of the I/I
created within the public sewer for the Penn Forest area had been
corrected. Therefore, the sewer surcharge and resulting backup
experienced by the homeowners was almost certainly caused by the
I/I from improper house connections. Video tapes made after the
last storm showed individual house laterals flowing one-half to
full for an observed five minute period. This is absolute proof
of the high magnitude of surface and sub-surface water entering
the sanitary sewer from improper house connections.
The procedure by which the homeowner is required to correct
faulty sewer connections and what penalty will be used for those
that do not make timely corrections, will be discussed in a
future work session with the Board.
Conclusion
The Utility Director feels that the SSE/R program is effec-
tive in reducing the I/I problems within the sewer system. It is
also felt that the County must correct/reduce the I/I within the
publicly owned system before steps can be taken to have the home-
owner correct their individual problems. However, any obvious
individual problems, such as roof drain or sump pump connections
to the sanitary sewer, will be required to be corrected immedi-
ately after they are observed. There will be a reluctance of
homeowners to correct improper sewer connections, but they must
realize the impact on their own houses and those of their neigh-
bors. The staff will need the full support of the Board members
in order to take a firm but fair position in requiring that home-
owners make proper and timely repairs.
A-6987-2
ITEM NUMBER F- ..~
AT A REGULAR MEETING OFgEHROANOKE COUNTYEADMINISTRP,TIONNOCENTER
COUNTY, VIRGINIA gELD AT T
MEETING. DATE: June 9, 1987
SUBJECT. Transfer of $4,000 park bond fundfund ballnfi eadsark to
~- The School Board budget rd Junior High School.
behind the new William By
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
~ ~~~~~-~
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
lanning to develop ball fields behind the
The School Board is p
new William Byrd Junior High School. and will bedutWlized by the
by the County schools during the day
County Parks and Recreation Department in the evening- towards
The Town of Vinton has approved the allocation of $4,000
development of these fields. T oke County bast beeno~equestedhto
also approved $3,800. Roan for construction of the
contribute $4,000. The balancePTAcsssRecreation Clubs and Booster
ball fields will be raised by
Clubs who will be using the fields.
ro riated from the 1985 Park Bond program
$150,000 has been app P
for Vinyard Park. $4,000 from this fund could be transferred o
the County schools for this purpose.
FISCAL IMPACT: 5117
None. These monies would be transferred from the 1985 Park Bond
earmarked for Vinyard Park.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that Roanoke County contribute $4,000 toward
the development of ball fields bfunds be transferredlfrom the
Junior High School, and that roeect to the appropriate School
1985 Park Bond Vinyard Park p J
Board budget item.
~~
/~~;ww/.
G
Elmer C. Ho 4
County Administrator
--------------
------------------ VOTE
----
---------- -- ACTION No Yes Abs
Approved (X) Motion by: HCN/AHB to approve Brittle X
Denied O s f r m en a ion Garrett X
Received ( ) Johnson X
Referred McGraw X
To ______ Nickens X
cc: File
Gary Huff
John Hubbard
Reta Busher
Bayes Wilson, School Superintendent
A-6987-3
Item ~-'
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THROANOKE OCOUNTYEADMINISTRATIONNOCENTER
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE VA., ON TUESDAY,
IN ROANOKE,
MEETING DATE: June 9, 1987
SUBJECT: Request for Board of Supervisors Resolution expressing
-- concerns with Senate Bill 538
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: /f~
~~
~: ~ .,~
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
Senate Bill 538 is a bill to implement the recommendations of the
Secretary of Labor's Task Force ° osesnomThe Acttitsnsited asrthe
T e
dislocation and for other purp
"Economic Dislocation and Worker bdl.ls asnit relatesetocec'onomic
most important area of thls
developers is Title II, Advance Notif ication e ndeCWith lflfty or
Employers are defined in this section aor(m re employees who in
more full time employees, or (b) fifty er week (exclusive of
the aggregate work at least 2,000 h orr large layoff means an
overtime). The term plant closing to er at any
or more employees of an emp Y day
employment loss of fifdt Y period. It requires a ninety
site during a thirty lant closings involving not fewer
period in a case of proposed p loyees, a
than fifty or more than one hu~na teclosingstinvolvi` g more than
120-day period in the case of p eriod in the case of a
100 or fewer than 500-500dor more affected employees.
plant closing involving
Since the major source of Virginia's prospect leads lies in the
northern states, this bill is seen by economic development
the "prospecting" efforts of local and
professionals as limiting new industries into Virginia and
state representatives to bring The attached resolution should
specifically the Roanoke Valley. ressing the Board of
be sent to our Senate members exp
Supervisors' concerns.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve the attached resolution and forward to Senator's Warner
and Trible.
SUBMITTED BY:
Timo by W. Guba a
Assistant County Administrator
Approved ( )
Denied ( )
Received ( )
Referred
To T. W.
Gu a a
Attachment
APPROVED:
/"' _
C~~~
Elmer C. Ho ge, Jr.
County Administrator
ACTION
Motion by:No Action - referred
to T. W. Gu a a to eep Board
a vise .
VOTE
No Yes Abs
Brittle
Garrett
Johnson
McGraw
Nickens
t.{
cc: File
Tim Gubala
AT A REGULAR MEETIDGAOFTHEEROANOKEOCOUNTYRADMOINISTRATOIONOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HEL 1987
CENTER ON TUESDAY, JUNE 9, /--~-, ~
RESOLUTION CONCERNING SENATE BILL 538 "'
WHEREAS, the U.S. Senate is considering action on
legislation entitled "Economic Dislocation and Worker Adjustment
Assistance Act" (Senate Bill 538); and,
WHEREAS, the passage of this legislation will seriously
affect economic development efforts to attract industry and
business into the Roanoke Valley of Virginia by limiting current
prospecting and marketing efforts.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors
of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That Senator Paul Trible and Senator John Warner
recognize that this legislation in its present form will hamper
the efforts of local, regional and state economic developers to
attract new industry into the Roanoke Valley of Virginia.
ITEM NUMBER
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: June 9, 1987
SUBJECT: Presentation of the Health Department Six-Year Plan
for Roanoke County.
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
Dr. Margaret L. Hagan, Health Director of the Alleghany District,
has requested time on the agenda this afternoon to present an
executive summary of the Health Department Six-Year Plan for
Roanoke County. She will also update the Board on the activities
of the department.
~/I~T
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
---- --------------
------------------- ACTION VOTE
Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs
Denied ( )
Received ( )
Referred
To
Brittle
Garrett
Johnson
McGraw
Nickens
f ~
. ,~= 5
`/ M ~
A L L E G H A N Y H F. A i. T H D I S T R I C T
S I X YM:AR PLAN
FOR THF.
FISCAL YEARS 1988 - 1994
Margaret L. Hagan, M.D.
Director
May 1, 1987
~, .
ALLEGAANY HEALTB DISTEICT
SIX YEAR PLAN
INTRODUCTION
Just as individuals need to plan in order to achieve long and short-term goals,
the Alleghany Health District needs a formal, effective planning system if
the desired outcomes are to be realized in the communities it serves. Studies
show that businesses that do long-range planning show better performance to a
significant degree than those companies in the same industry that do no
;$ formal planning. Since little has been done to evaluate strategic planning in
the public sector, the success of strategic planning in the buslanninwoind
serves as impetus for the need to do strategic, or long-range p g
the Alleghany Health District. Through such planning, the activities of the
Alleghany Health District can be selected, organized and implemented ose for
such a way as to maximize attainment of the District's goals, or p p
existence in as economical manner as possible.
The Alleghany Health District Six Year Plan(FY 1988 - 1994), was developed
by its supervisors, its past director, Nancy M. Welch, M.D., M.H.A., and
has been endorsed by its newly appointed director, Margaret L. Hagan, M.D.
The plan was written by the district's public information officer, Keitha M.
Lackey.
Through a series of meetings, analysis of community needs and individual
research, goals, objectives and strategies were established for eight core
programs in the district. These goals., strategies and objectives were then
forwarded to the government officials of each locality and to the individual
health department's Board of Directors advisory board comprised of community
professionals and leaders. Once the plans were reviewed by these individuals,
the staff revised the plan where necessary.
The goals, objectives and strategies outlined in the plan will provide a
framework for decision making in which proposed services. and their costs
can be evaluated. Based on the plan, action steps will be outlined that
work to achieve the program goals.
The plan is deliberately flexible and incorporates evaluation measures to
be performed periodically to determine plan effectiveness and allow for
revision if nc~cessdaevaluatedpbyndistric[ supervisors.byAththatlt~menyrevisions,
District staff an
if necessary, will be made.
During the past months, the Alleghany Health District supervisors have come
to recognize the significance of a strategic plan. Through community research,
the goals and objectives of whichlourlfutureeplans areadevelopednd prioritized
and serve as the basis from
Any questions or comments about this plan should be directed to Dr. Margaret
Hagan, Director or Keitha Lackey, Public Information Officer.
.'~ .,~
SUMMARY DEMOGRAPHIC DATA FOR ROANOKE COUNTY
DEMOGRAPHICS:
Roanoke County, Virginia (includes Town of Vinton)
HSA IIZ, Planning District S, Alleghany Health District
County Seat: Salem, Virginia
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: 248.3 square miles in the Roanoke Valley
region of Southwest Virginia.
TOTAL POPULATION: 72,945 people representing 48% of the
Alleghany Health District population.
POPULATION DENSITY: 294 persons per square mile
134.2 persons per square mile (Virginia)
725 persons per square mile (United States)
GENERAL NARRATION: The citizens of Roanoke County represent a
relatively young population with 82% being less than 55
years of age, the largest percent of any of the Alleghany
Health District localities. Individuals 18 years old and
younger comprise the greatest portion, 30% of the county's
population. Females comprise 52% of the population, males
48%. Racially, Roanoke County is comprised of 97% whites
with all minorities representing only 3% of the total
population. Roanoke County has the highest median household
income, $20,671 per household and the second lowest unemployment
level, 3.2%. Indicative of the high median household income
and the low unemployment rate, Roanoke County has the lowest
percent of its population at or below 125% of poverty level,
8.2%.
SUMMARY: In summary Roanoke County is a relatively young,
financially established, semi-urban community with
a predominantly white population. The County of Roanoke
data includes that from the Town of Vinton which has a
population of 8,027 and is 3.2 square miles in size.
ALLEGHANY HEALTH DISTRICT
SIX YEAR PLAN
GEOGEAPHIC AND DSNOGRAPHIC SUtiMARY
644 84
The Alleghany Health District is a widely diverse region encompassing 1, .
square miles of national forest, mountain ranges, serene valley land and
urban development. Located in the southwestern portion of the state, much of
the district borders on Wes[ Virginia. Political jurisdictions are charac-
terized by: the four counties of Alleghany, Craig, Roanoke and Botetourt;
three independenwhose1dataffsoconsolidatedfintoFthat ofdRoanoke Countyhe
Town of Vinton,
District-wide population figures total 152,563 with the most populated area
being Roanoke County, a predominately metropolitan area bordering the cities of
Roanoke and Salem, and encompassing the Town of Vinton. Roanoke County has
a population oflo2ed4nationallforestopuTheetotalapopulationCofnCraigOoCounty is
which is undeve p
3,948.
The Alleghany Health District depicts a highly. dissimilar set of geographical,
political and cultural regions. A demographic summary of each Alleghany
Health District locality will demonstrate the diverse nature of the population
served by the local health departments.
SIIC YEAR PLAN - E7CECUTIVE SU!!!lARY
A. ALLEGHANY HEALTH DISTRICT(AHD)
D, gpVlitONlIENTAL ]iEALTH
C. NEED IN AREA
.~ lgg4 Needs Assessment indicates that fran 297.(Roarwlte County~Salem) to 79X(Alleg)rarry
county, Covington, Clifton For$ee) of the population smokes, and therefore 8~rates pas-
sive smoke in the environment. Currently, there are 436 restaurants in the Aim ardi~ly~e-
26 are knaan to have designated rte-sinking areas to protect customers a~inst pas
A food program evaluation perfonred in 1986 showed a difference of 17 points between the
local health department inspection and the evaluation perfonrecl by the Southwest Regional
Office. This indicates that not alai i~El'adti~~are` bei~~ •. bl~ite of this dis-
crepancy, the district has not expe
projected population growth for Roarwke~ gel estaurant growth and)thus met
County(11.3X for the next 3 yrs.), y
for sanitarians' services.
Our most effective means of protecting the public from waterborne disease in rural cann,mities
is by guarding the grotadwater supply from contamination~itted~lls8and wellserthat~~
to be contaminated. Since this represents only newly pe
families requested to be tested, it is an inadequate representation of the total available
well supply. Although Allegharry County, Covington, Clifton Forge, and Craig County are
not experiencing population growth, Roanoke County has had a 33.7% increase in septic tank
applications and Botetourt Canty has experienced a 16.7% increase aver the last 3 years.
Roanoke County officials expect to establish more central water systens, rural Botetourt
Canty does not plan arty new central systems in the caning years. With their projected
population growth previously noted, demand for sanitarians' services is expected to escalate.
The incidence of rabies in Virginia is spreading toward the AHD. In 1985, there was 1
case of rabies in Botetourt Canty; in 1986, 4 cases in Allegheny County and 1 case in Bote-
tourt Canty were reported. Most rabies cases are confirmed in wild animals which is
extrcrmly difficult to control. In domestic animals, the number of rabies infected cats
is significantly higher than dogs throughout the state(3 dogs, 29 cats fran 1980-1986), and
1 case of rabies was confirmed in a Botetourt County cat. Currently, only Allegheny County,
Covington, and Clifton Forge have an ordinance requiring the vaccinations of cats against rabies.
D. PROGRAM GOAL
To protect the population of the AHD from food and water borne disease and from errviranrental
health hazards.
E. PROGRA!! OBJECTIVES
1. By 1989, there will be a l~lo increase in restaurants m~3tai~/ngi~de~~ ~ br~~ ing
area, by 1991 a 2fP/ increase, by 1992 a 25% increase, by
a 35% increase.
2. the same low level of foodborne disease outbreaks will Conti ~~n11988 1 S~in~1989~
crepancy between the evaluation and actual restaurant scores by
2CP/, in 1990, 2S/ in 1991, 3(r/. in 1992, and 3S/. in 1993.
3. '!he sam low level of waterborne disease outbreaks will continue yet, to assist in econ-
omic growth, by 1988 8CP/. of septic tank applications will receive an initial visit within
21 days of application receipt, by 1989 8 ~/, by 1990 9(p/, by 1991 9CP/ will be visited within
15 days and by 1992 9Z'/. will be visited within 15 days.
4. By 1994, the AHD will have 6~/ of its canine and feline population vaccinated against rabies.
F. RESOURCES REQUIRED
1. Personnel: 2. Financial Support
Total- l6 FTE's Totdl - $x,198,970
~,,, - 1 FTE New - $ 299,389
SIX YEAR PLAN • - EXECUTIVE SU!!!lARY
A. ALLEGNANY HEALTH DISTRICT (AHD)
B. !lATERNAL HEALTH
C. NEED IN AREA
VDH statistics for 1985 illustrate that in the AHD, less than half(45.3%)
of health departmeEarlaterenatalacaretaidsiinathe earlytdetectionn treatment,
first trimester. y P re nano 41.4% of
and even prevention of some of the complications of p g y•
AHD maternity patients suffered a complication of pregnancy as compared
1 respectively.
to southwest regional and state reventionois2another basis for the advocacy
The issue of low birth weight p
of early prenatal care. During the first six months of 1986, 17X of
health department maternity patients delivered a low birth weight infant,
while the comparable state figure was only 7.4%.
Adolescent maternity patients are particularly vulnerable to pregnancy
complications.. Toxemia and premature or prolonged labor are higher for
teenage mothers and their infants are twice as likely to die in the firsC"
year of life as other infants. In Virginia in 1985, low birth weight
infants born to teenage mothers were 9.8%, while low birth weight infants
born to non-teenage mothers were 6.7%.
In Alleghany County, Covington and Clifton Forge, there are currently
2 obstetricians who deliver babies. They are seldom able to accomodate
medicaid patients. Since our health department will not admit patients
beyond 16 weeks gestation there is no doctor available for these clinics),
1 to 2 women per week are turned away from the health department. Of
the 65 patients seen in ]986 in the Alleghany~Coving11nthavclledetorRoanokc
this clinic includes the Clifton Forge residents),
Memorial Hospital for delivery, a distance of 60 to 90 miles.
Enrollment in the WIC(Women, Infants and Children) program whould occur
simultaneously with maternity clinic admission. In 19A5, first trimester
WIC admissions were only 15% of health department first trimester admissions.
Data is presently being collected and collated manually for recent
figures since state health department data is 1 to 2 years delayed.
An improved system of automation and retrieval is needed.
D. PROGRAI! GOAL renatal
To provide AHD women of childbearing age with early and adequate p
care within 40 miles of their homes.
E. PROGRA!! OBJECTIVES
1. Reduce the percentage of 2~~. b1r1990e130% byf1992,1ande40%hbye1994ment
patients in each locality by y
Cov-
2. By 1994, the number
ington and Clifton Forge
increase to 100%.
F. RESOURCES REQUIRED
]. Personnel:
Total - ]7 FTE's
4 FTE's
f maternity clients in Alleghany County,
who have a local provider of prenatal care will
2. Financial Support:
Total - $4,990,880
New - $ 391,227
New -
RESOLIRCES INCLUDE CHILD HEALTH CORE PROGRAM AS WELL AS MATERNAL HEALTH
SIX YEAiI PLAIT - EXECUTIVE SUtltlAiRY ,
A. ALLEGHANY HEALTH DISTRICT~AHD)
g. CHILD HEALTH
C. NBED IN AREA
Kant mortality rate in the AtD for 1985 was 10.1. 6.4'~ of all lrt~t pants inethe Alto were
birth weight babies. In 1985, 16X of babies born to health depa
low birth weight infants. of acute illnesses, 8Cl/. of which are respiratory.
Preschool Children e.~erience a high freq~~y this riod(ref. dental health, health
Nutritional and dental h~lth needs are critical during Pe
education and inforretian). how well their emotional
'lt~e future mental health as adults of preschoolers is influenced by lest pose a serious thr~t
needs are met during this phase of their lives. Child abuse ~ ~g
to children's health, both physically and emotionally.
5-19, suffer morbidity primarily from respiratory illness, injuries,
Sch~l Children,, ague ~ digestive conditions.
infectious and parasitic disease, teens ers,
In 1984, 5(T/. of Virginia's deaths in this age group were d~ to accidents. wrong g
the 2nd and 3rd most common causes of death were suicide and homicide.
rise 3.9'/ of school population.
Handicapped students comp
and inappropriate diet), and poor and inadequate dental health
Nutritional problems overeating
continue to plague school children. Carer 5(T/. of Virginia's school age children a[ any aie t~
is in need of dental care' rted by
Public Health Nurses screen for and diagnose pediculosis when suspected cases are repo
school officials.
27% of reported cases of gonorrhea in Virginia were in school age children.
Roanoke County is the only district locality offering a family life education program.
Of high school students, 72%. of seniors have used alcoh~i~~c3of bulimi~and a~orexiak'is ~n~reaslnK.
a 30 day p<'riod• 10-15% of students arc overweight;
there are 2 Roanoke County school nurses, l in Salem and none in Botet~rt County,
In the AHD,
Craig Camty, Allegheny County Covington and Clifton Forge.
Family Planning and teen pregnancy is addressed in Family Planning core program.
D , PROGRAlI GOAL
All children, including those with chronic handicaps, will function at their optimal level.
E, PROGRAlI OBJECTIVES
1, gy 1994, infant death rate will be reduced by 2(r/.•
2, gy 1994, all groups of children will grow according to established norms.
3, By 1994, lOCl/. of children in A4® will be screened to determine the existence of conditions
which may require special services.
4, sy 1994, all school children will be screened and referred for necessary diagnosis and
treatment for deficient hearing vision according to school guidelines during elementary and on
referral. All school children will be screened for scoliosis by age 12.
~• gy 1yy4, incicknce of pediculosis in school age children will be reduced by 5CT'/.
g. RESOURCES REQUIRED
Personrx~l: INCLUDED IN MATERNAL HEALTH CORE PROGRAM
Existing -
New - HEA1."[1i (;Ultl PROGKAM
Fin.~nc ial Support ~ 1N(-~~~ IN MATF-R~
~»•
SIX YBAR PLAN - EXECUTIVB SU!lMARY
A, ALLEGHANY HEALTH DI5TRICT(AHD)
B° FAMILY PLANNING
C, NEED IN AREA
rates among the non-
There has been a general decreasing trend in pregnancy Count The ratio
teenage population in the AHD with the exception of Craig y° since it is
of pregnancies to births is an indicator of unintended pregnancy,
estimated that 95~ of the discrepancy is due to inducts nanctitosbirthlratios
the highest relative proportion of abortions with a p $ Y
of 3.5. Respective figurn~ f2rlthAlleghanynCountyloCovingtonaand Clifton
County 2.8, Botetourt Cou y
Forge 1.6, and Craig County 1.2. re Wane in the AHD
There is need to reduce the rate of unintended teenage p g y
due to the increased Weilht babiestbornetogteenagermotherso the high per-
centage of how birth g
In 1985, 1 in 7 teenage girls age 15-19) in Covington became pregnant.
Respective figures for the remaining localities within the AHD aRoanoke County
Salem 1 in 11, Clifton Forge 1 in 13, Botetourt County 1 in 17,
1 in 19, Alleghany County 1 in 20, and Craig County 1 in 40.
The average delay between a teenager's initiation of sexual intercourse and
her first visit to a family planning clinic is 16 months. 14y° of teenagers
seek contraception before having intercourse, 36% seek servilesnanter Reasons
have already become pregnant or believe that they mo8ras[ination, fear that
given for the delay in seeking contraception are p
parents will find out, and "it won't happen to me"robBemetoTeenagenfemalesents
indicate transportation during school hours is a p
who use a contraceptivewhilehnon-contraceptiveeusersthavexae66%nteenage/preg-
teenage pregnancy rate
nancy rate.
Studies indicate that sc'ociatedtwithrpostponementeoflsex.tePolls consistently
activity and is also ass
reveal that 70-90% of parents favor sex education in the schools. Current y,
Roanoke County is the only district locality offering a family life education
program.
D. PROGRAM GOAL
To reduce the number of unintended pregnancies, specifically among the low-
income and teenage populations.
E. PROGRAM OBJECTIVES 30%.
By 1994, reduce teenage pregnancy in Salem, Covington and Clifton Forge by
By 1994, reduce unintended pregnancy in Roanoke County and Salem by 30~.
Maintain the teenage pregnancy rates in the counties of Botetourt, Roanoke,
Alleghany and Craig.
F. RESOURCES REQUIRED
Financial Support:
Personnel: Total - $2,513,257
Total - 8 FTE's New - $ 162,999
New - 0 FTE's
A.
8.
C.
SIII YEAR PLAN - g7CECUTIVE SU!!!lARY
ALLEGHANY HEALTH DISTRICT (AHD)
INFECTIOUS DISEASE
Nggp IN AREA lobeacter,
The AHD boasts a small number of reportedwithe55ireportedccases(inmaydistrict
giardiasis, satmonellosis, shigellosis),
population of over 150,000.
The AHD experienced a decreaseeTe WePet151casesnofchepatitistB(serum)einin
1985 and 10 cases in 1986. Th
1985 and 16 cases in 1986. roblems because of
Sexually transmitted diseases are major public health p
the serious complications that can result: pelvic inflammatory disease, infant
pneumonia, infant death, birth defects and mental retardationhilis.1985,
the AHD had 80 reported cases of gonorrhinfpctiousadiseasesyp The incidence
AIDS is one of the most alarming of the the end of 1985, the
of AIDS has doubled annually from 1979 to 1984. By
doubling trend appeared to be leveling off at the national level. In Virginia
it is expected that by 1990, 3073 Virginians will have developed AIDS. As
of March 7, 1987, the AHD has 4 reported cases of AIDS. The number of new
AIDS cases are expected to folAHD nativesldevelopaAlDSrindother partsfofethe
increase in our district. As
country, they will probably return home to the WeseXiectfan increase feexisting
P
in addition to new cases diagnosed in the AHD,
AIDS patients who return home for care.
The incidence of tuberculosis has been decreaslegialtneedlto work1towardsHDhe
However, with the increase in AIDS, there is sp
prevention of the spread of tuberculosis. 007 cases in
Influenza is an under-reported disease. Virginia reported 1,
1985 and 4,481 cases in 1986. ath rateefoorftheanationr tPopulation85atnrisknza
season exceeded the expected de
for complications due to influenza should be immunized.
p, PROGRAM GOAL
To protect the AHD population from contracting communicable isease.
g, PROGRAM OBJECTIVES
Maintain current low level of intestional infections.
Maintain same low level of hepatitis B, but reduce level of hepatitis A by
5% by 1994.
Maintain same low level of gonorrhea and syphilis.
Maintain current low level of AIDS cases in the AHD as a percentage to total
Virginia AIDS cases(1.084% of Virginia AIDS cases are in the AHD as of March
7, 1987).
Maintain current low level of tuberculosis cases in the AHD. ainst
gy 1994, 60% of high risk population will be immunized annually ag
influenza.
F. RESOURCES REQUIRED
fersonncl:
~,~~ ~ .~ ~ _ S FTE' s
N~•w - 0 FTE' s
Financial Support:
Total - $2,106,146
New _ $ 58,300
t,
SIX YEAR PLAN - EXECUTIVE SU!!!lA1RY
A. ALLEGHANY HEALTH DISTBICT~AHD)
g. DENTAL HEALTH
C. NEED IN AREA
In Clifton Forge, a city without a fluoridated central water suttee time
25% of all baby teeth have been attacked by dental cavities by
a child is age 5. By age 13, 25% of all permanent teeth are carious.
Depending on the age group, Clifton Forge students tithe generallysaccepted
DMF decayed, missing, filled) as the Isle of Wight,
standard.
Roanoke County statistics indicate a higher DNF with lower socioeconomic
levels and non-fluoridated water supplies(a range of 1.08-1.83 compared
with Isle of Wight's .08-3.66 and the state range of .25-5.66)•e children
In Clifton Forge, only 30-409: of therf75ZiB8tisfactory)ch~3x of these
are met health professionals considel9°~ have all their care completed.
children need dental care, and only
ublic health dentist or private dentist volunteer
Currently, there is no p
in the Clifton Forge health department. 70_90% of dental caries
In the Roanoke County and Salem school systems,
were missed on the preschool examination, with the health department
having the highest rate of detection.
idemio-
National figures indiildrenhagell°1°-17 havecthedsameagonditionhavEpgin-
givitis and 32% of ch iene to a higher inci-
logic studies have consistently linkeerpodontalldisease.
Bence and severity of gingivitis or p
Education is an essential coneribChildrenaare the maanctaorgetfofethelneeded
caries and periodontal diseas ro er oral hygiene
education and the objectives include instruction on p p
and avoidance of cariogenic foods. Edecuestsafromalocaloschooledistricts
of smokeless tobacco are prompted by Q
due to the increased occurranceeos(refrschnidtheal~h)fold increase of
oral cancer in chewers and d pp
D, PROGRAM GOAL roach of treat-
To reduce and manage oral disease throramsa combined app
ment and public health preventive prog
E, PROGRA!! OBJECTIVES
1, By 1994, reduce rhthanFthe Islet of Wight.5th grade students to no
more than 60°ti greate
2, By 1994, reduce the DMF of Roanoke County 5th grade students to no
more than 25% greater than the Isle of Wight.
3. By 1994, evaluate thndex°ofl5thagradefsBudentsrasatheCtool.County
students using the DMF
F. RESOURCES REQUIRED
Financial Support:
1, Personnel: Total - $2,075,519
Total - 6 FTE's 188,381
New - 2 FTE's New - $
SIX YEAR PLAp - EXECUTIVE SUlIlIARY
A, ALLEGHANY HEALTH DISTRICT (AHD)
g, CHRONIC DISEASE
C, NEED IN AREA
of the ell able adult population and data is twt available
The pHp serves a small percentage 8 tients have and what, if airy, impact can be
on what risk factors and cht~ivicendiseases ~ ~~ due to chronic disease.
made on reducing risks and p n$ ~P
35% of Clifton Forge residents are aver age 65. The respective percentagies for other AHD
localities are 317, in Covington, 247. in Salem, 21% in Craig County, 19'~ in Alleghatry Caa~ty,
19% in Roanoke County, std 18% in Botetourt County.
6% of the eligible low income) adult population in Adult
In fiscal year 1986, the AHD saw ~•
Health 1+6intenance clinics ref. tables 2 and 3, core plan). There has been ~ overall increase
lion of Botetourt County which results fran a 6 month period
in caseload sianoe 1983 with the excep
during which clinics were not held(due to lack of funds). or causes of mortality in
Diabetes std hypertension increase the risk of death due to the maj _
the per, cardiovascular disease and cancer. 'Ihe A~ estirtiatesressure,91861with d agnos~edtdia-
in the district have a chronic disease, 2932 with high blood p ram).
betes, and 161 with undiagnosed diabetes(ref. table 4, core p og
Certain behavioral styles contribute to chronic disease. They are smoking, use of alcohol,
high blood pressure, overweight, and lack of exercise.
The ixmber of health department home health care patients is declining in most localities,
largely due to an increased availability of private sectorrcaaCe homer ~ agencies iC dies
however, show a continuing gain in admissions since most p
district do not serve these rural areas.
p, PROGRAM GOAL
To promote health and prevent disease in the well adult, and to monitor stable chronic disease.
E. PROGRAM OBJECTIVES
By 1990, current health andamedforlthetconditionscthatlares~mrtitored inladult healthtclinics.
Adult Health Maintenance s
Hy 1994, staff will see at least 1~/ of the eligible adult population in Adult Health Main-
terk3nce clinics. ressure
By 1994, at least 60% of the estimated clinic population having a definite high blood p
will have attained successful long term control.
By 1994, at least 5(T/. of clinic adults will be able to state the principle risk factors for
cardiovascular disease.
By 1994, the proportion of clinic adults who smoke should be reduced to 2~/..
By 1994, virtually all routine health contacts in Adult Health Maintenance clinics will include
nutrition education and nutrition course ng
By 1994, the proportion of clinic adults participating in regular exercise will be SCI/.
liy 1994, at least 4ft7 of the clinic population with diabetes will havr attained long term control.
By 1994, hone care services necessary to meet client and family needs will continue to be
available and accessible to those in need.
Pharmacy services will expand to meet the increase in number of patients.
F. RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS
Financial Support
Personnel: ~ Total - $7,06,100
Tot r+l : 32 FIE s New _ $ 190, 700
New - 0 FIE's
ktf:50tJltCF.S 1NC:LUDE til•ALT11 ~l1CATI0N CORE PROGRAM AS DELI' ~' (IIltQVIC DISEASE
SIX YEAR PLAN - EXECUTIVE SU!!!lAxY
A• ALLEGHANY HEALTH DISTRICT (AHD)
B, HEALTH EDUCATION AND INFORlIATION
C. NEED IN AREA
major cardiovascular disease is the major cause of death in the `~ *~~ a rate of 371.4100,000
in 1985. 'lttis is slightly higher than the rate for the state of Virginia which was 359.6 100,000
for the same year. Malignant neoplasms cancer) ranks as the second leading cause of death
for the AFm with a rate of 167.7 ~ 100,000 in 1985. 'Itte rate for Virginia ~ i~1985~~'h~e•
Accidents are the third leading cause of death in the AID, with 35.2 100,
rate for Virginia was 38.2 100,000. In the A ~,•~ rdnw~ slate d~ r od,increased ~ 4,~t
from 1982 to 1985 and cancer has increased by
The following behaviors contribute to cardiovascular disease, cancer or accidents at+d m
the AtD localities: smoking, use of alcohol, high blood pressure, high stress,
prevalent thra~tout
overweight, lack of exercise, failure to wear seatbelts.
.~ 1984 needs assessment indicates both a perceived and actual need for stress rt•
High levels of stress and inadequate coping have been shown to increase risks for cardiovas-
cular disease, cancer and substar-ce abuse. Substance abuse has been itrQlicated in appraoc-
imntely half of all automiobile fatalities.
In a needs assessment conchacted in 1984, health department patients as wellra~nhe gay 1
population identified a need to know more about the role of the health depa
identified care for the indigent, but were unaware of most of the other services(emrirontiental,
eating establishment and septic system regulation, health education, school trursing program.
rttttent plays a major role
dental health, vital statistics, home health). Since the health ~t that the comuutity is
in the health of all members of the corm~utity, it is vitally impo
aware of and supportive of its services.
p. PROGRAM GOAL
Community residents will have the necessary knowledge, skills, capacity and opportunity to
improve and maintain individual, family and community health; use preventive health services,
practices and facilities appropriately; understand and participate, where feasible, in decision-
making concerning their health care; understand and carry out prescribed medical instructions;
and participate in community health decision-snaking.
E. PROGRAM OBJECTIVES
By 1994, death rates from cardiovascular disease will decrease by 5°.G, fry cancer by ~/. and
from automobile accidents by 1CP/..
By 1994, at least SCI/ of the adult population will be able to slate the principle risk factors
for cardiovascular disease, cancer and accidents.
By 1994, the number of people who smoke will be reduced to 25%.
By 1994, the nutter of people exercising regularly aerobic) will be 3C1~ of the population.
By 1994, 4cr~ of the overweight population Will have adapted weight loss regimins coa~ining an
appropriate balance of low fat, law salt, high fiber, diet and aerobic exercise.
By 1994, SCI/o of the popwlation will be able to state the synQtoms of Stress and healthy "gays
to decrease stress.
By 1994, 7~/ of the population will use seatbelts in autrniobiles 8CI/. of the time.
By 1994, 85% of thelAHDta~/to~heaservices offeredaby the health bepal~n~ll be able to
state correctly at
By 1994, ]0(r/ of local governnment officials will be able to state correctly the trends of their
localities in terms of causes of death, teenage pregnancy, and law birthweight.
F, RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS
Personnel: INCUIDED IN CHRONIC DISEASE RESOURCE RE.QI~lREMhN15
Financial Support: INCLUDED IN CIiRON1C DISEASE RF;SOURCE REX2UIREI~IENI5
A-6987-4
ITEM NUMBER /- "
AT A RIRGINIAMHELDNATOTHEHROANORE COUNTYEADMINISTRP,TIONNCENTER
COUNTY, V
MEETING DATE: June 9, 1987
SUBJECT: Report on Safe and Effective Control of Mosquitoes
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
At the May 12, 1987 Board of Supervisors' meeting, I was directed
to meet with Dr. Margaret Hagan to investigate ways of
controlling mosquitoes.
Dr. Hagan requested information from the State Health Department,
and found that the State does not have a program for the
eradication and control of mosquitoes. Since 1962, the Health
Department has collected statistics on the number of diseases
caused by mosquitoes. There have been none in southwest Virginia.
The State does offer suggestions to individual homeowners on
preventative measures that may be taken to eliminate breeding
places for mosquitoes.
Both Dr. Hagan and I feel that no spraying program should be
instituted by the County. In addition to the cost of manpower,
equipment and chemicals, there is the danger of potential
liability in using hazardous sprays.
RECOMMENDATION
Dr. Hagen and I recommend that no spraying program be instituted.
Rather, we suggest that citizen inquiries and complaints be
referred to a staff person who has been trained to respond with
the proper recommendations. Dr. Hagan has expressed a
willingness to furnish the staff person with the information
necessary.
/~- C~
SUBMITTED BY:
..G'
e neth L. H gan
Chief Animal Control Officer
APPROVED BY:
2
Elmer C. Ho e
County Administrator
--
-----
---------
---
-------------- -
-----
--
VOTE
-------- ACTION No Yes Abs
p,pproved (X) Motion by: HC~i/SAM to approve _
mmendation and refer Brittle X
X
Denied ( )
ceived ( )
R staff reco
uestions and com laints to Dr. Garrett
Johnson X
e
Referred Ha an - Health De artment McGraw X
To ______ Nickens X
cc: File
Kenneth Hogan
Dr. Margaret Hagan
Information Desk
ITEM NUMBER Z
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF EHROANOKE OCOUNTYEADMINISTRATIONNOCENTER
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT TH VA. ON TUESDAY,
IN ROANOKE, ,
MEETING DATE: June 9, 1987
SUBJECT: Conveyance of a drainage easement
Barrens Village
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: L~- ~ ~~~~
Gam`
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
F and B Developers, Inc. has requested the conveyan Roanoke
15-foot drainage easeDeer RunoEstatese in ode ~wtods bccessfully
County in Section 1, The easement will
complete the construction ofro ert n line o f the well lot and will
be located along the south p P Y
be dedicated for public use. of real estate orfanyeinterestCtherer
requires that the conveyanc ordinance.
in be accomplished only by
The proposed ordinance d take such actionsnas maylbesnecesr
to execute such documents an of the
sary to accomplish thes Nelda on June s9, 1987t1the secondgreading
proposed ordinance was
is scheduled for June 23, 1987.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that that Backed ordnance,consider this
proposal by the adoption of the
Respectfully submitted,
Vv~~ VV~.
Paul M. Mahoney
County Attorney
,~.- ~
-----------
---- VOTE
-----------
ACTION No Yes Abs
Approved ( ) Motion by: Brittle
Denied ( ) Garrett
Received ( ) Johnson
Referred McGraw
To Nickens
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER, ON TUESDAY, JUNE 9, 1987 ,,,_~_ f
ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE CONVEYANCE OF /
A DRAINAGE EASEMENT, BARRENS VILLAGE
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of
the Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading concerning the
conveyance of a drainage easement for Barrens Village was held on
June 9, 1987. A second reading on this matter was held on
June 23, 1987.
2. That this drainage easement is necessary in order to
pipe storm water from Barrens Village to existing facilities in
Starmount Avenue.
3. That the County Administrator is authorized to exe-
cute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke
County as are necessary to accomplish the conveyance of said pro-
perty, all of which shall be upon form approved by the County
Attorney.
ITEM NUMBER
A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOAKE OCFOUNTYEADMINISTRATIONNCENTER
AT
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HINDROANOKE,ROAN, ON TUESDAY,
June 9, 1987
MEETING DATE: e Dis-
Cha ter 18, "Sewers and Sewag
the installation of Septic Tanks an
SUBS- Ordinance amending P
posal, concerning rescribing fees for the issu-
requiring a permit and p
ance of permits
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR' S COMMENTS : a ~h ~ , b ~ ,~,~~~
~- ~~ ~
d~ cue-~~-~-ncti.,c .,.L?~ _ ~,,, .~-a-~'"~
f G~', ~, r' `a- J
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: 1950, as amended,
ulate the installation of septic
Section 15.1 nt0 to reg Code of Virginia'tall a septic tank
authorizes any Cou y to ins
tanks by requiring any person desiring
a ermit and to prescribe reasonable fees fOStems poseua
to secure P Defective or failed septic sy
ermits. safety, and welfare. There-
ance of said p ublic health, uire such a
significant threat to P Code should be amended to req ose a
fore, the Roanoke County tic tank installation and imp
permit as a prerequisite to sep
permit fee of $50.00. the budget process.
This permit fee was discus oX m teiyg$29,000 in fees could
ermit p it is also anticipated that
Although it is estimated that app sic tank
this p rocess,
be generated by estion and
the imposition of a fee wlrtmenauconcurs in b his Bugg P 50 Fee.
ornery counties impose a
requests. The Health Depa
advises that both Floyd and Montg
rove planning and control of
This permit process could imp enerate funds
ulated developmental impacts. It also could g
defra a portion of the County's costs for sanitarians an
unreg
to Y
inspectors.
of an amending ordinance is s sh Scheduled
The first reading and public hearing
June 9, 1987; a second reading
for June 23, 1987.
FISCAL IMPACT:
50.00 permit fee, estimate of $29,000 General Fund revenues
for FY 1987-88
"^'
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the Benda o theuCounty Codefavorably
consider this proposed ordinance am 9
Respectfully submitted,
Paul M. Mahoney
County Attorney
_________ ------------------- VOTE
- ACTION No yes Abs
Approved { ) Motion by: Brittle
Denied ( ) Garrett
Received ( ) Johnson
Referred McGraw
To Nickens
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE E ROANOKESCOUNTYSADMINISTRATOION
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT TH dUNE 9, 1987
CENTER, ON TUESDAY,
ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 18 , "SEWERS .~ - ,,~',,
AND SEWAGE DISPOSAL," AN ORDINANCE
CONCERNING THE INSTALLATI P E RM I TSE AN D
TANKS, REQUIRING A
PRESCRIBING FEES FOR THE ISSUANCE OF
SAME
WHEREAS, Section 15.1-520 of the Code of Virginia,
count to regulate the
Y
1950, as amended, authorizes any
erson
installa-tion of septic tanks, to require that any P
to install a septic tank secure a permi t to do so, and
desiring ermits;
to prescribe reasonable fees for the issuance of said p
and
WHEREAS, defective or failed septic systems pose a sig-
nificant threat to public health, safety, and welfare, constitute
an environmental and ecological hazard, and threaten the County's
precious groundwater resources.
IT IS HEREBY ORDAINED by the Board of Roanoke County,
Virginia, that Chapter 18, "Sewers and Sewage Disposal," is here-
by amended as follows:
1) All buildings in the county in those areas where
se tic tanks are permitted shall have septic tanks installed for
p
the disposing of sewage and other human waste.
2) Before any septic tank systems are constructed or
installed, it shall be the duty of the landowner upon whose land
the construction or installation is to take place, to secure a
ermit from the Health Department. The Health Department shall
p
.~ ,~
review this permit request based upon the requirements and regula-
tions promulgated pursuant to Title 32.1 of the Code of Virginia.
Any septic tank permit issued under this section shall be valid
for a period of fifty-four (54) months from the date of issuance
unless there has been a substantial, intervening change in the
soil or site conditions where the septic system is to be located.
The availability of a public sewer system shall constitute a sub-
stantial intervening change in the site conditions to void a per-
mit.
3) There is hereby established a permit fee of fifty
dollars ($50.00) for each septic tank. This permit fee shall be
paid to the Treasurer before permit application is made to the
Health Department.
4) Any person, firm or corporation violating any provi-
sions of this ordinance shall be subject to a Class 3 misdemeanor
for each offense; and a separate offense shall be deemed commit-
ted on each day during or on which a violation occurs or contin-
ues. Further any violation or attempted violation of this ordin-
ance may be restrained, corrected or abated by injunction or
other appropriate proceeding.
5) The effective date of this ordinance shall be
July 1, 1987.
ITEM NUMBER =__ /
AT A REGULAR MEETING OFHEHROANOKE COUNTYEADMINISTRATIONNOENTER
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT T VA. ON TUESDAY,
IN ROANOKE, ,
MEETING DATE: June 9, 1987
SUBS- Ordinance amendingheeannualllicense tax onamotorC~ehiy
Code to increase
cles
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~~ ~ ,hh'~.
~ ~~~.~
b ~` ~ ~~
~ L o, p ~ ~ - ,,~..~-c~,w
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
On April 28, 1987, the Board indicated its intention to in-
crease the County vehicle lice Wse rito the Gene ral Fund,$thetstated
Although these funds would flo roblem of drainage
purpose for this increase was to address the ro osed increase is
in the County. A public hearing on this p P ro osed
scheduled for May 26, 1987. The first reading on this A P is
ordinance was held on May 26, 1987; and the second reading
scheduled for June 9, 1987.
This proposed ordinance amends Section 12-28 of the Roanoke
County Code. It increases this annuaitlsubstant Tally oincreases
$20 for most motor vehicles; hoow edrincrease for trucks is based
this tax for trucks. The prop
upon the weight of the tr~eklabut in most cases is not the
maximum authorized under sta
This proposed ordinance also establishes certarecepiceptsoof
from the annual license tax for prisoners of war, rovides for a
the Medal of Honor, and disabled veterans. It p
reduced tax for members of the National Guard.
The effective date of this proposed ordinea~e and fory tax
1987, and shall be for revenue8derived sfrom xthis increase will
years thereafter. Any
not be actually receivedhen C mm assio ner• ofh the rRevenaeorand athe
has been reviewed by
Treasurer. A comparison of decal fees among the area localities
is attached for your review.
FISCAL IMPACT:
It is anticipated thai thi200 000 a if taut mobile 1 feese are
will generate approximate y $
increased or $260,000 if all fees are increased as shown on the
attached schedule.
RECOMMENDATION:
At the Board's request,
Board for its consideration.
this ordinance is submitted to the
Respectfully submitted,
~, ~~` , V ~
Paul M. Mahoney
County Attorney
--------------- -
---------------- ---- VOTE
ACTION No yes Abs
Approved ( ) Motion by: Brittle
Denied ( ) Garrett
Received ( ) Johnson
Referred McGraw
To Nickens
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OKESCOUNTYSADMINISTRATOION
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANO 1987
CENTER, ON TUESDAY , JUNE 9 , ~. ~--
ORDINANCE AMENDING DE C TD NINCREASE THE
ROANOKE COUNTY CO
ANNUAL LICENSE TAX ON MOTOR VEHICLES
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That Section 12-28 of the Roanoke County Code en-
titled "Levy and amount of tax; special provisions for antique
vehicles." be amended to read and provide as follows:
Sec. 12-28. Levy and amount of tax; special provisions for
antique vehicles; exceptions.
(a) There is hereby levied an annual license tax on
every motor vehicle, trailer he amountraofesuch gtaxe shallbbelas
censed under this article. T
set forth in the following subsections of this section.
(b) On every motortherec sh 11 beXea tax r of h~l€~eeh
sections of this section, 20.00) per annum, except that the_
twent dollars {$}5-ee} ($- er annum.
tax on motorc cles shall be fifteen dollars ($15.00)
(c) On each tollow n schedule :here shall be a tax per
annum according to the f g
Gross Vehicle Truck Tra---ller
Weight in Pounds_
~5-A8 $20.00 $ 6.50
1,500 or less $}5-88 20.00 15.00
1,501 to 4,000 2g_A8 25.00 20.00
4,001 to 6,500 25_AA 30.00 20.00
6,501 to 10,000 35;A8 40.00 20.00
10,001 to 20,000 45:A8 60.00 20.00
20,001 to 30,000 55_A8 70.00 20.00
30,001 to 40,000 65:AA 80.00 20.00
40,000 and over
The tax for a trailer dersgand f f y c nt y($6.50)ansport boats
shall not exceed six Jolla
(d) The owner of an "antique motor vehicle," as de-
fined and licensed in title 46.1 of the Cod on°fil ng anlapplay
secure a local license or decal at no charaemept of a five dollar
cation far same with ahm rit eof uthe appropriate personal property
($5.00) fee and the p y
lication shall remain valid so long as the vehi f
taxes . This app licant . `~ ~`' ~ d
cle is titled to the app ''-
(e) The followin °Wtaxs oanmhonorabllcdischar edrebl-
exem t from the annual license
soner of war an erson award he hviMednia Nat~onal Guardnshall
abled veteran. An member of
be entitled to a local license or ax a rescribed in this sectione
in the amount of one-half of the
These exem tions scklowbedlbmlandel~ ibleonersonSenThe
vehicle icku or anel tru
commissioner of the revenue he Commissmoner of the De arbment
u on the criteria utilized b
of Motor Vehicles of the Co~eSnwe The treasurernis herebhe autho-
ance of s eeial license la
rized to issue a local license or decal to owners eli ible under
this sub-section.
2, The effective date 1988tlicensee taxe year a d for
July 1, 1987, and shall be for th
tax years thereafter.
EETING OF THE BOARD OF SC~UNTYSADMINISTRATOION
AT A REGVIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE 1987
COUNTY, CENTER, ON TUESDAY, JUNE 9,
ORDINANCE 6987-5 AMNT DICODE ETOIOINCREASE
OF THE ROANOKELICENSE TAX ON MOTOR
THE ANNUAL
VEHICLES Roanoke
IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of
BE
County, Virginia, as follows: Code en-
1. That Section 12-28 of the Roanoke County
amount of tax; special provisions for antique
titled "Levy and
' les." be amended to read and provide as follows:
vehic special provisions for
tax;
12_28, Levy and amountexceptions.
Sec. antique vehicles;
levied an annual license tax on
~a) There is hereby uired to be li-
motor vehicle, trailer and semitrailer regtax shall be as
every this article. The amount of such
censed under subsections of this section.
set forth in the following
On every motor vehicle 11 baxed under other su -
e a tax of €}f~een
(b) there sh exce t that the
sections of this section, er annum,
}5-88~ ~$2~~ p 15.00) er annum.
twent dollars f$
x on motorc cles shall be fifteen dollars ~ all be a tax per
to
~c) On each follow ng tschedule:here s
to the
annum according
Trams r
Gross Vehicle Truck
Wei ht in Pounds $ 6,50
$}5:A8 $2_ 0•~~ 15.00
1,500 or less }5-8A 2_0_0 20.00
1,501 to 4,000 2g_AA 25_00 20.00
4,001 to 6,500 25._88 3000 20.00
6,501 to 10,000 35-AA 40_00 20.00
10,001 to 20,000 45_A8 6~~ 20.00
20,001 to 30,000 55-88 70'~~ 20.00
30,001 to 40,000 65_AA 80,p~
40,000 and over to transport boats
trailer designed exclu Ce t Y ($6.50).
The tax for a
shall not exceed six dollars and fifty as de-
"antique motor vehicle," may
~d) The owner of an of the Code of Virginia,
title 46.1 on filing an appli-
fined and licensed in a ment of a five dollar
secure a local licensethe dr easureroandapgY up
cation for same with
($5.00) fee and licataoneshall
taxes. This app
cle is titled to the applicant.
the appropriate personal property
remain valid so long as the vehi-
(e) The following owners
exempt from the annual license tax
soner of war, an
abled veteran.
be entitled to a
in the amount of
erson awarded the
An member of the V
local license or de
one-half of the tax
of motor vehicles are hereby
an honorably discharged pri
Medal of Honor ana an d1~
it inia National Guard shall
cal u on the a ment of a fee
prescribed in this section.
These exem tions shall be limited to an one assen er
vehicle icku or anel nue shall ddeterminel e li i b 1 t n • based
commissioner of the reve
u on the criteria utilized ommonwealthl ofl V it nia hfoDethetmssu_
of Motor Vehicles of the C autho
ance of special license plates The treasurer islheible under
rized to issue a local
this sub-section.
cense or decal to owners e g
2. The effective
July 1, 1987, and shall be for
thereafter.
date of this amendment shall be
the 1988 license tax year and for
tax years
On motion of Supervisor Nickens,
seconded by Supervisor
Brittle and upon the following recorded vote:
AYES:
Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson
NAYS: None
A COPY - TESTE
~sYl~~-eye ,~
Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
6/10/87
CC: File
Commissioner of the Revenue
County Treasurer
Joha Busher1SDirectortoftBudgetyandmManagement
Ret ,
County Attorney
Thomas M. Blaylock, Commonwealth Attorney
Magistrate
Sheriff's Department
Roanoke Law Library
Main Library
County Codes
~_ 2.
ITEM NUMBER
AT A REGGINRA HELDNATOTHEHROANOKE
COUNTY, VIR IN ROANOKE, VA., ON
MEETING_ E~ June 9, 1987
OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
TUESDAY ,
Ac uisitRenlacement/Improvement Water Projects
SUB- J--i- 1987/88 P
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR' S CO,,M_M/ENTS:
a~'~''" ~"l.
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: fete the following 1987/88
In order to successfully ro mects: Clearbrook Water II,
Glen Forest Water Project, Geiser
replacement/improvement water p J
Water System,
North Lakes Western Hills and Woodland Drive,
Road/Grander, Wendover Drive, uisition of easements across
it is necessary to authorize r h erty owners.
acent p P
the real estate of adj Administrator
The proposed ordinn~se authorizes the Coun first reading of
and take such activities as may be
to execute such docume The f
necessary to accomplish these transacti26s'1987; the second read-
the proposeduled1forcJunes9he1987n May
ing is sched
FISCAL IMPACT:
s for these projects shall be paid from the Utility
The cost
Depreciation Account.
RECOMMENDATION: consider this
It is recommended tof thehattached ordinabce.
proposal by the adoption
Respectfully submitted,
~~,
Paul M. Mahoney
County Attorney
`-- VOTE
------------------------ ACTION No Yes Abs
Approved ( ) Motion by: Brittle
Denied ( ) Garrett
Received ( ) Johnson
Referred McGraw
To Nickens
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOROANOKESCOUNTYSADMINISTRATOION
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE 1987
CENTER, ON TUESDAY, JUNE 9,
ORDINANCE NTST FOR Z1987/88E REPLACEMENT/
OF EASEME
IMPROVEMENT WATER PROJECTS
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1, That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of
concerning the
the Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading
North Lakes
acquisition of easements for Clearbrook Water II, ad Grander,
ater System, Glen Forest Water Project, Geiser Ro / is
W ro ec
Wendover Drive, Western Hills, and Woodland Drive water p 7
was held on May 26, 1987. A second reading on this matter was
held on June 9, 1987•
to complete the
2, That these easements are necessary
rovements Water Projects.
above-referenced 1987/88 Replacement/Imp service to the citi-
These projects will provide necessary utility
tens of Roanoke County.
3. That the County Administrator is authorized to exe-
e such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke
cut
t as are necessary to accomplish the acquisitions of said
Coun y the County
property, all of which shall be upon form approved by
Attorney.
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOROANOKESCOUNTYSADMINISTRATION
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE
CENTER, ON TUESDAY, JUNE 9, 1987
ORDINANCE 69_ 8__7=6 AUTHORIZING THE
ACQUISITION OMPROVEMENT WATERR PROJECTSB
REPLACEMENT/
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1, That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of
concerning the
the Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading
North Lakes
acquisition of easements for Clearbrook Water II,
Water System, Glen Forest Water Project, Geiser Road/Grander,
endover Drive, Western Hills, and Woodland Drive water projects
W
was held on May 26, 1987• A second reading on this matter was
held on June 9, 1987•
2, That these easements are necessary to complete the
above-referenced 1987/88 Replacement/Improvements Water Projects.
These projects will provide necessary utility service to the citi-
zens of Roanoke County.
3. That the County Administrator is authorized to exe-
cute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke
unt as are necessary to accomplish the acquisitions of said
Co Y the County
property, all of which shall be upon form approved by
Attorney.
On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor
Garrett and upon the following recorded vote:
AYES• Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson
NAYS: None
A COPY - TESTE
.7~
Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
6/10/87
CC: File Director
Phillip Henry,
Clifford Craig, Director
John Hubbard, Assistant
County Attorney
of Engineering
of Utilities
County Administrator
ITEM NUMBER ~ `~
ULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OFOUNTYEADMINISTRATIONNCENTER
AT A REG
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HINDROANOKE,ROVANOKEON TUESDAY,
June 9, 1987
MEETING DATE: the
ECT: Ordinance to increase f eR salaries of members o
oanoke County, pursuant to
SUBJ
---- Board of Supervisors
Section 14.1-46.01:1
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: s~ r~2~ ~~
~' .~i~~~a G~-'+"P
~~
SUMMARY OF INFORMATIONS ted an ordinance to
ear on May 27, 1986, the Board adop
Last y ursuant to the provisions of Section 14.1-
increase its salaries P inia. This section of theinc cease odn
46.01:1 of the Code of Virg uire that any ublic
and Section 3.07 of the Chart fished by ordinance after p
supervisor's salariei and J ne 30. Any increase is limited to an
hearing between May
annual five ( 5 0 ) percent inflation factor .
of this proposed ordinance was held ing
The first reading includes the evening
May 26, 1987. Since this meeting would suggest that this reThe
for public hearings on rez~he n Public hearing requirement.
ing could also osfti~hi proposed ordinance is scheduled for
second reading
June 9, 1987•
ro osed salary for Board mem Hance establi hes the addom
Thep P this ord 1800
$7607 to $7987. In addition,
annual compensation for the Chairman of the Board at
tlonal
and Vice Chairman at $1200.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Five (5%) percent increase in Board salaries--
($380 each x 5 = $1900)•
RECOMMENDATION:
None.
Respectfully submitted, ~
~..._.
~ ~`` ~ `~
Paul M. Mahoney
County Attorney
-------------- VOTE
--- ACTION No yes Abs
Approved ( ) Motion by: Brittle
Denied ( ) Garrett
Received ( ) Johnson
Referred McGraw
To Nickens
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD ATUESDAYOAJOUNE 9OUN987ADMINISTRATION
CENTER, ON
ORDINANCE TO INCREASE THE SALARIES OF ~~° ~~
MEMBERS OF THE BOAP A ~ ANT PTO I O CT ION
ROANOKE COUNTY,
14.1-46.01:1
WHEREAS, Section 14.1-46.01:1 of the 1950 Code of
Virginia, as amended, establishes the annual salaries of members
of boards of supervisors within certain population brackets; and
WHEREAS, Section 3.07 of the Charter for the County of
Roanoke provides for the compensation of members of the board of
supervisors, and the procedure for increasing their salaries, and
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia, has heretofore established the annual salaries of Board
has
members to be $7607 by Ordinance #5-27-86-124, and further,
established the additional annual compensation for the Chairman
of the Board to be $1800, and for the Vice Chairman of the Board
to be $1200; and
WHEREAS, this section provides that the maximum annual
salaries therein provided may be adjusted in any year by an infla-
tion factor not to exceed five (50) percent; and
WHEREAS, the first reading on this ordinance was held
on May 26, 1987; the second reading was held on June 9, 1987•
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDAINED by the Board of
Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that the annual salaries
of members of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia, are hereby increased by an inflation factor of five
(50) percent pursuant to the provisions of Section 14.1-46.01:1
J. ~
ode of Virginia, as amended. The new annual sal-
of the 1950 C In addition, the
aries shall be $7987 for members of the Board.
the Board will receive an additional annual sum of
Chairman of
he Vice Chairman of the Board will receive an addition
$1800 and t
1200.
al annual sum of $ 1 1987.
This ordinance shall take effect on July ,
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGININTERELONATUESDAROAJONE 9OUN987ADMINISTRATION
CE ,
ORDINANCE 6987-7 TO INCREASE THE
SALARIES OF MEMBERS OF THE BpURSUANT
SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY,
TO SECTION 14.1-46.01:1
WHEREAS, Section 14.1-46.01:1 of the 1950 Code of
Virginia, as amended, establishes the annual salaries of members
of boards of supervisors within certain population brackets; and
WHEREAS, Section 3.07 of the Charter for the County of
Roanoke provides for the compensation of members of the board of
supervisors, and the procedure for increasing their salaries; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia, has heretofore established the annual salaries of Board
members to be $7607 by Ordinance #5-27-86-124, and further, has
established the additional annual compensation for the Chairman
of the Board to be $1800, and for the Vice Chairman of the Board
to be $1200; and
WHEREAS, this section provides that the maximum annual
salaries therein provided may be adjusted in any year by an infla-
tion factor not to exceed five (50) percent; and
WHEREAS, the first reading on this ordinance was held
on May 26, 1987; the second reading was held on June 9, 1987.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDAINED by the Board of
Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that the annual salaries
of members of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia, are hereby increased by an inflation factor of five
(50) percent pursuant to the provisions of Section 14.1-46.01:1
of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended. The new annual sal-
shall be $7987 for members of the Board. In addition, the
arses
Chairman of the Board will receive an additional annual sum of
$1800 and the Vice Chairman of the Board will receive an addition-
al annual sum of $1200.
This ordinance shall take effect on July 1, 1987.
On motion of Supervisor Brittle, seconded by Supervisor
McGraw and upon the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson
NAYS: None
A COPY - TESTE
.,~d . cu,e.~e-rte
Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
6/10/87
CC: File
John Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator
Reta Busher, Director of the Budget
County Attorney
Roanoke Law Library
Main Library
ITEM NUMBER_ ~ = `-
OF THE BOARD OF SUPE ADMINISTRATIONNOENTER
AT A REGULAR MEETING ON TUESDAY,
VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY
COUNTY, IN ROANOKE, VA.,
June 9, 1987 line
MEETING DATE: of portion of a water
Vacation and Relocatioerty a
SUB-`- easement - Ozanich Prop
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
~~
OF INFORMATION: ro erty owners of Lot
SUMMARY the p P reloca-
and Rebecca A. Ozanich, uested the
Wayne E. Penn Forest, have req
Section 9, the intersection
g~ Block EE- The relocation would allow
section of a 10-inch water line nea To accomplish
tion °f a o Drive and Oriole Lae on his property.
of Flaming arag the present water line
Mr. Ozanich to construct a g 100 feet of to be vacated and
uest, approximately ro erty needs Section
this req. through their p P a new easement.
easement runThis will require obtain that the acquisition of real
relocated. uires ordinance.
of the County Charter req accomplished only by
18'04 interest therein be
estate or any the County Administrator
actions as may be neces-
The proposed ordinance authorizes of the
to execute such documents and take such The first reading
eld on May 26, 1987% the second reading
to accomplish these transactions.
sary
proposed ordinance was 1987.
is scheduled for June 9,
FISCAL IMF---'~ the cost of relocation.
Property owner is paying for
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended
proposal by the adoption
Board favorably consider this
that the
of the attached ordinance.
Respectfully submitted,
rV~
Paul M. Mahoney
County Attorney
---------- ~- = y
--------------------- VOTE
------------------------- ACTION No Yes Abs
Approved ( ) Motion bY:
Denied ( )
Received ( )
Referred
T o _---
Brittle
Garrett
Johnson
McGraw
Nickens
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOROANOKESCOUNTYSADMINISTRATION
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE 1987
CENTER, ON TUESDAY, JUNE 9,
~~~/
ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE VACATION AND
AND RELOC1A~TNON OOZANICHORPROPERTY A WATER
LINE EASE ,
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of
the
the Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading concerning
acation and relocation of a portion of a water line easement on
v
26 1987, A second rea ing
the Ozanich Property was held on May ,
on this matter was held on June 9, 1987; and
ortion of the present
2, That the vacation of a P
ent and the acquisition of another easement is necessary for
easem
the relocation of a 10-inch water line; and is authorized to
That the County Administrator
3.
cute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke
exe
County as are necessary to accomplish the vacation an
uisition of said property, all of which shall be upon form
acq
approved by the County Attorney.
MEETING OF THE BOARD OFESCOUNTYSADMINISTRATION
p,T A REGULAR HELD AT THE ROANOK 1987
COUNTY, VIRGINIA. ON TUESDAY, JUNE 9-
CENTER,
THE
ORDINANCE 698 AUTHORIZING A
VACATION AND WATERELONETEASEMENT,
PORTION OF A
OZANICH PROPERTY
RAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
BE IT OR
Virginia, as follows:
County,
t ursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 °
1, Tha P concerning the
Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading
the water line easement on
vacation and relocation of a portion of a
t was held on May 26, 1987. A second reading
the Ozanich Proper y and
1987;
on this matter was held on June 9- f a portion of the present
vacation o
2, That the
uisition of another easement is necessary for
easement and the acq
line; and
the relocation of a 10-inch water to
t the County Administrator is authorized
3, Tha
currents and take such actions on behalf of Roano d
execute such do f i s h t h e v a c a t i o n a n
to accomp
County as are necessary on form
' ion of said property, all of which shall be uP
acqulslt
the County Attorney.
approved by seconded by Supervisor
On motion of Supervisor Brittle,
Garrett and upon the following recorded vote:
ervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson
AYES: Sup
NAYS: None
A COPY - TESTE
~, L
H. Allen, Deputy Clerk
Mary Board of Supervisors
Roanoke County
6/10/87
CC: File Assistant County Administrator
John Hubbard, ineering
Phillip Henry, Director of Eng
Clifford Craig, Director of Utilities
Real Estate Assessor
County Attorney
ITEM NUMBER ~~~
THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
AT A REGULAR MEETINGTOTHE ROANOKE COUNTY YDMINISTRATION CENTER
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HINDROANOKE, VA., ON TUESDA ,
DATE: June 9, 1987 to
MEETING the County AdminisandtOight-
Ordinance authorizing of utility
SUBJECT: donation or dedica~o ements therein
----- accept the
of-waY road easements and imp
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
~,ry~~ ' .i
~~~~~ ~~
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: uires that
Charter req accomp-
Section 18.04 of the Roanoke COint,erest therein be uires
the acquisition of real estate or any
ordinance. The adoption of an ordinance req
lished only by are
two readings. hts-of-way
easements and rig the County
utility prior to
The acquisition of matters. donations or
generally non-controve~outinely accepted such Under the
the Board on the consent agenda. 1 ing
Charter, resolution
dedications by delays of at least one month occur comp
charter provisions,
with the new procedure. to eXpedite the
ose of this proposed ordinance is and
The pure This ordinance will authorieasement ounty
acceptance procedure. of utility of the County
to accept dedications ervisors
Administrator the review and recommendation
staff and the concurreice of the Board °f u but also
rights-°f -way upon 'nance is a general authorizing
engineering This proposed ord the charter
by resolution. the requirements of of this
tance process. The first reading
ordinance satisfying 26, 1987 the second reading
streamlining the accep
proposed ordiforcJunes9 h 1987 n May
is scheduled
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
RECOMMENDATION: consider this
that the Board favorably
It is recommended
osal by the adoption of the attached ordinanc .
prop
Respectfully submitted, ~ _J
-~~~~~- ~ ~ `Y~
Paul M. Mahoney
County Attorney
__ ------------------------------------ VOTE
----- ACTION No Yes Abs
Approved ( ) Motion by: Brittle
Denied ( ) Garrett
Received ( ) Johnson
Referred McGraw
To ____-__ Nickens
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE EOROANOKESCOUNTYSADMINISTRATOION
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT TH 1987
CENTER, ON TUESDAY, JUNE 9,
~°
ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THONAT ON OR ~ ~
ADMINISTRATOR TO ACCEPT THE D
DEDICATIOINvIENTS UAND IMPROVEMENTSTTOHEREIN
ROAD EAS
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of
the Charter of Roanoke County, first and second readings are
required to pass all ordinances; and
WHEREAS, the County routinely acquires utility and
road easements for various County engineering and
right-of-way
utility projects and for private developments; and
WHEREAS, it is the intent of this ordinance to provide
approve,
for an orderly and expeditious procedure to review,
authorize, and accept the donation or dedication of such
interests in real estate.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of
Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia as follows:
1, That upon the proposed donation or dedication of a
ur oses, and any
utility easement or a right-of-way for road p p the County
improvements or facilities constructed therein,
Administrator is hereby authorized to accept said donation or
dedication, upon the review and recommendation of the County
en ineer, or his designee, and upon the concurrence of the Board
9
of Supervisors by resolution.
2. That the County Administrator is authorized to
execute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke
County as are necessary to accomplish the acquisition of these
easements, all of which shall be upon form approved by the County
dministrator may delegate this authority
Attorney. The County A
as he deems appropriate.
The effective date of this amendment shall be
3.
June 9, 1987.
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THTHEOROANOKESCOUNTYSADMINISTRATION
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD A 1987
CENTER, ON TUESDAY, JUNE 9,
ORDINANCE 6987=9 AUTHORIZING THE COUNTY
ADMINISTRATOR TO ACCEPT THE DONATION OR
DEDICEASEMENOS AND IMPROVEMENTSHTHEREINY
ROAD
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of
the Charter of Roanoke County, first and second readings are
required to pass all ordinances; and
WHEREAS, the County routinely acquires utility and
road easements for various County engineering and
right-of-waY
utility projects and for private developments; and
WHEREAS, it is the intent of this ordinance to provide
rocedure to review, approve,
for an orderly and expeditious p
authorize, and accept the donation or dedication of such
interests in real estate.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of
Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia as follows:
1, That upon the proposed donation or dedication of a
utility easement or a right-of-way for road purposes, and any
improvements or facilities constructed therein, the County
Administrator is hereby authorized to accept said donation or
dedication, upon the review and recommendation of the County
engineer, or his designee, and upon the concurrence of the Board
of Supervisors by resolution.
2, That the County Administrator is authorized to
execute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke
County as are necessary to accomplish the acquisition of these
easements, all of which shall be upon form approved by the County
The County Administrator may delegate this authority
Attorney
as he deems appropriate.
3, The effective date of this amendment shall be
June 9, 1987.
On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor
Garrett and upon the following recorded vote:
Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson
AYES:
NAYS: None
A COPY - TESTE
Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
6/10/87
CC: File
County Attorney
John Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator
Phillip Henry, Director of Engineering
Clifford Craig, Director of Utilities
,~ - ~,_,.,_.-r
ITEM NUMBER ___
R MEETING OF THE BOARD ONTY A MINISTRATIONRCENOER
AT A REGULA
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HINDROANOKE,ROA OKONCOUESDAY,
1987
MEETING DATE: June 9,
Ordinance authorizing the purchase of
a Water Storage Reservoir Site
SUBS=-
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ,~~~
~~~ ~~~
,,~gyi~r+~" "_
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
These
'lit Department has determined teereservo~rs~f sites
The Uti Y
ted at certain required elevations which have been
for the construction of future water s o water systems that they
sites are loca the pressure zones of the
establishedab~ of.
will be a p a 100-foot by
Staff proposes to purchase one of the wh ch is located off
ht-of-waY~ Dou Sawyer. Staff
100-foot parcel with a 25-foo~ore9ty owned by g The
Sugar Loaf Mountain Road on P i e of $5,000 for this site.
otiated a purchase p the County
has neg
rice for this site has been reviewe e ac uisition
urchase p consider this price to be reasonable.
P uires that th q
Assessor's Office and they Charter req lisped only by
Section 18.04 of the Couiri~ rest therein be accomp
of real estate or any
ordinance. Administrator
The proposed ordinal cared take such actionsnas may be neces-
The first reading of the
to execute suc 1 sh this transaction. the second reading
sary to accomp 2C, 1987;
proppSeduled1forcJunes9 h 1987 n May
is sche
FISCAL IMPACT: com letely
rice of $5,000 for this site is poining
The purchase P aid by Mr. Sawyer and an adj
off-set by the water fees P installed water main.
property owner for connection tOUaredCently
No appropriation of funds is req
RECOMMENDATION: urchase of
ro riate staff be
Staff recommends that urthe $Othat atheo aPP P e P this pur-
this parcel of land and f wired documents to effect
authorized to execute the req
chase.
APPROVED:
SUBMITTED BY:
~/~ _ J _
Elmer C. Hodge
Clifford Cr ig ~ County Administrator
Director of Utilities
_____ --------------------------------- VOTE
------- ACTION No Yes Abs
Approved ( ) Motion by: Brittle
Denied ( ) Garrett
Received ( ) Johnson
Referred McGraw
Nickens
T o _~
ETING OF THE BOARD OF SCOUNTYSADMINISTRATOION
AT A REGVIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE 1987
COUNTY, CENTER, ON TUESDAY, JUNE 9,
RIZING THE PURCHASE OF
ORDINANCE AUTHO
WATER STORAGE RESERVOIR SITE u ervisors of Roanoke
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of S p
County, Virginia, as follows:
rsuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of
1, That pu concerning the
Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading
the ht-of-
0-foot by 100-foot parcel with a 25-foot rig
purchase of a 10 26, 1987.
water storage reservoir site was held on May
way for a 1987.
d reading on this matter was held on June 9, .s necessary
p, secon ro erty 1
2, That the acquisition of said p p
and
the construction of a water storage reservoir;
for uired from Doug Sawyer in
3, That this property be acq
000; and
the amount of $5,
authorized to exe-
4, That the County Administrator is
and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke
cute such documents all of
are necessary to accomplish this transaction,
County as Attorney.
which shall be upon form approved by the County
.,, .
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THTHEOROANOKESCOUNTYSADMINISTRATOION
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT 1987
CENTER, ON TUESDAY, JUNE 9,
ORD IN SECOF 6WA STORAGERRESERVOIR
PURCHA
SITE
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1, That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of
concerning the
the Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading
urchase of a 100-foot by 100-foot parcel with a 25-foot right-of-
p 2g, 1987.
way for a water storage reservoir site was held on May
A second reading on this matter was held on June 9, 1987•
2. That the acquisition of said property is necessary
for the construction of a water storage reservoir; and
3, That this property be acquired from Doug Sawyer in
the amount of $5,000; and
4, That the County Administrator is authorized to exe-
cute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke
to accomplish this transaction, all of
County as are necessary
roved by the County Attorney.
which shall be upon form app
On motion of Supervisor Garrett, seconded by Supervisor
Brittle and upon the following recorded vote:
Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson
AYES:
NAYS: None
A COPY - TESTE
Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
6/10/87
CC: File
County Attorney
John Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator
Clifford Craig, Director of Utilities
Real Estate Assessor
~~~~{
ITEM NUMBER
THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
GULAR MEETING OF ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
AT A RE HELD AT THE ON TUESDAY,
COUNTY, VIRGINIA VA•,
IN ROANOKE,
MEETING DATE: June 9, 1987
ursuant to Section 15for
and resolution P and right-of-entry
S_ E_ ~T_ public Hearing condemnation ect road improvements
238(e) authorizingDevelopment Proj
Ho1linStatemRoute 648•
along
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMME M/~~ ~~~~~_
,.,~,~,,,,ru+
U ~
dr
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: ublic hearing
rovides for a notice and P entry uthe
1-238(e) P to authorize immediate fete
Section 15• ervisors In order to comp along
by the Board of Sup thereof. improvements
and condemnatiment Project road
real estate Develop be condemned:
easements must
Hollins Community
oute 648, four
State R E, Stuart
-Larry G. Stuart and M147.56
Fair Market Value - $ Haynesworth
nesworth and Thelma T.
-Mason Hay Value - $128.87
Fair Market two easements)
Butler and Margaret Bolden But1565(60
-Leonard - Land $1,883'13' $ $650.00
- Improvements - Fence - 1,800,00
Fair Market Value Well - $
House - $1,150.00
Pump
owners in
to the property of fair
were given final offers
Notices by mail also included reports. This
These notices by the appraisal condemnation
questionValues as indicated step to commence
market is a necessary first
procedure
proceedings~
FISCAL IMPACT: for the condemnation
and expenses revenue
1us legal costs Roanoke and Botetourt
$6325.16 p fees- for the road right-of-way
actions and expert witness used
sharing funds are being
acquisitions-
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the proposed resolution be
the Board after the required public hearing.
`_~- ~ 4
adopted by
Respectfully submitted,
Paul M. Mahoney
County Attorney
------------------------- ACTION
VOTE
Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs
Denied ( )
Received ( )
Referred
To
Brittle
Garrett
Johnson
McGraw
Nickens
~ ~' ~'._/
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGICENTERELONATUESDAROAJONE 9OUN987ADMINISTRATION
RESOLUTION PURSUANT TO SECTION 15.1-
238(e) OF THE 1950 CODE OF VIRGINIA, AS
AMENDED, SETTING FORTH THE INTENT OF
ROANOKE COUNTY TO ENTER UPON CERTAIN
PROPERTIES AND TO TAKE CERTAIN RIGHTS
OF WAY IN CONNECTION WITH THE HOLLINS
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROJECT
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That the Hollins Community Development Project is a
multi-phased neighborhood program involving residents in Roanoke
and Botetourt counties, said project will include water, sewer,
and road improvements and housing rehabilitation; and
2. That in order to complete the road improvement
phase of the project, certain rights-of-way are needed and more
particularly described as follows:
A) A ten (10) foot strip of land across
the property of Larry G. Stuart and
Mary E. Stuart and more particularly
described as running along Route 648
for an estimated 130 feet, containing
0.04 acre as shown on the attached high-
way plans which are a part of the
appraisal report.
Together with a temporary construction
easement more particularly described as
an approximate eight (8) foot strip of
land running an estimated 45 feet along
Route 648 and containing 293 square
feet as shown on the above-referenced
plans.
The fair market value of the aforesaid
interest to be acquired is $147.56,
such compensation and damages, if any,
having been offered the property
owners.
B) A small strip of land across the proper-
ty of Mason Haynesworth and Thelma T.
Haynesworth and more particularly de-
scribed as a small strip running along
Route 648, being 14-feet wide and 107-
feet long, containing 0.03 acre as
shown on the above-referenced plans.
Together with a temporary construction
easement more particularly described as
a small strip of land, approximately
10-feet wide, running along Route 648
for an estimated 120 feet, containing
1,121 square feet as shown on the above-
referenced plans.
The fair market value of the aforesaid
interest to be acquired is $128.87,
such compensation and damages, if any,
having been offered the property owner.
C) A strip of land across the property of
Leonard Butler and Margaret Bolden
Butler and more particularly described
as approximately 45-feet by 180-feet,
containing 0.22 acre as shown on the
above-referenced plans.
Together with a temporary construction
easement more particularly described as
a strip, approximately 10-feet by 10-
feet, and an irregular-shaped area,
approximately 20-feet by 25-feet along
Route 648, containing 1,510 square feet
as shown on the above-referenced plans.
The fair market value of the aforesaid
interest to be acquired is $1,883.12,
such compensation and damages, if any,
having been offered the property
owners.
D) A parcel of land across the property of
Leonard Butler and Margaret Bolden
Butler and more particularly described
as a strip of land, approximately 35
feet wide, running along Route 648 for
an estimated 190 feet, containing 0.14
acre as shown on the above-referenced
plans.
Together with a temporary construction
easement more particularly described as
a 10-foot strip running along Route 648
for an estimated 130 feet, containing ~ ~~
1, 350 square feet as shown on the above- ~~ -....~~
....
referenced plans.
The fair market value of the aforesaid
interest to be acquired is $565.60,
such compensation and damages, if any,
having been offered the property
owners.
2. That it is immediately necessary for the County to
enter upon and take such property and commence said road improve-
ments to straighten an "S" curve on State Route 648 in order to
create better visibility and improve traffic safety and to there-
after institute and conduct appropriate condemnation proceedings
as to said rights-of-way; and
3. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 15.1-
238(e) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and pursuant to
notice and public hearing as made and provided therein, the Board
does hereby invoke all and singular the rights and privileges and
provisions of said Section 15.1-238(e) as to the vesting of
powers in the County pursuant to Section 33.1-119 through Section
33.1-129 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, all as made
and provided by law.
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THEHEOROANOKESCOUNTYSADMINISTRATOION
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT T JUNE 9, 1987
CENTER, ON TUESDAY,
RESOLUTION 6987-11 PURSUANT TO SECTION
15.1- 238(e OF THE 1950 CODE OF
VIRGINIA, AS AMENDED, SETTING FORTH THE
INTENT OF ROANOKE COUNTY 'I'O ENTER UPON
CERTAIN PROPERTIES AND TO TAKE CERTAIN
RIGHT S ~ OMMUN ITY DEOVELOPMENT PROJECT H E
HOLLINS
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1, That the Hollins Community Development Project is a
ti- hased neighborhood program involving residents in Roanoke
mul P
ro ect will include water, sewer,
and Botetourt counties, said p J
and road improvements and housing rehabilitation; and
rovement
2, That in order to complete the road imp
hase of the project, certain rights-of-way are needed and more
P
particularly described as follows:
A) A ten ( 10 ) foot strip of land across
the property of Larry G. Stuart and
Mary E. Stuart and more particularly
described as running along Route 648
for an estimated 130 feet, containing
0.04 ac anss whichoarteeaaparteof lthe
way pl
appraisal report.
Together with a temporary construction
easement more particularly described as
an approximate eight (8) foot strip of
land running an estimated 45 293tsquare
Route 648 and containing
feet as shown on the above-referenced
plans.
The fair market value of the aforesaid
interest to be acquired is $14~-56,
$300.00, such compensation and damages,
if any, having been offered the
property owners.
of land across the proper-
B) A small strip nesworth and Thelma T•
ty of Mason HaY articularly de-
Haynesworth and mOStrpp running along
scribed as a sma1114_feet wide and 107-
Route 648, being 0.03 acre as
feet long, containing tans.
shown on the above-referenced p truction
with a temporary cons
Together articularly described as
easement more p of land, approximately
a small striprunning along Route 648
10-feet wide, feet, containing
for an estimated 120 the above-
1~121 square feet as shown on
referenced plans.
The fair market value of the aforesai
fired is $128.87,
interest to be acq if any,
such compensation and damages,
ro erty owner.
having been offered the p P
aeress tl~e preperty
C) A strip e€ }and aret Be}elen
of Beenard But}er art~er~}a~}y deser}bed
But}er and mere p45-feet by }SA-feet;
as apprex}mate}y sere as shevan en tie
eentaln}ng A-22
aye~e-refereneed p}ans=
tem@erary eenstr~et}en
TegetY~er w}tl~ art}erg}ar}y deser}bed as
easement m~rerexlmate}y }9-feet b~* }g-
a str}p; pp lrregu}ar-shaped area;
feet; and an 25-feet a}eng
appre~}mate}y 2g-fee }~S~A se~~are feet
Route 648; eenta}Wing }ans:
as sl~ewn en tl~e abe~ae-refereneed p
Tl~e fa}~ market ~a}cue e€ tl~e aferesald
};883.-}~-,
}merest to be aee~~}red }s $ }f any;
sued eempensat}en and damages
hamming been e€fered tie preperty
ewners=
}and aeress the pregerty of
B} A payee} of and pgargaret Be}den
Beenard But}er artier}ar}y deseribed
But}er and mere p rsx}mate}y 35
as a strip of }and; app Retrte 648 fey
feet wide; running a}eng 9~}4
an est}mated }9A feet; eenta}Wing
sere as sheran en the abe~e-refereneed
p}ans-
temperary eenstruetien
Together with art}es}ar}y deser}bed as
easement mere p running a}eng Route 648
a }g-feet strip
fer a ~ t~aremfee~ a9 sip®~antenebl~e abe~e~
}358 ~
~e€e~eneed g}ans-
Tl~e fa}r ~+a~l~et ~a}tie e€ tie a€e~e9alel
}nte~eat ~e be aee~c~l~eel }s $565:6A;
at~e~i eempe~9a~len a~e7 damage9 ~a ~e ~~'
l~a~}erg been a€€ereel tl~e p p
evanera-
2. That it is immediately necessary for the County to
rove-
enter upon and take such property and commence said road imp
ments to straighten an "S" curve on State Route 648 in order to
create better visibility and improve traffic safety and to there-
after institute and conduct appropriate condemnation proceedings
as to said rights-of-way; and
3. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 15.1-
238(e) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and pursuant to
the Board
notice and public hearing as made and provided therein,
rivileges and
does hereby invoke all and singular the rights and p
of
provisions of said Section 15.1-238(e) as to the vesting
powers in the County pursuant to Section 33.1-119 through Section
33.1-129 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, all as made
and provided by law.
On motion of Supervisor Johnson, resolution amended to
remove proceedings against Leonard Butler and Margaret Bolden
300 and changing fair
Butler, who agreed to a settlement of $6, ,
market value of property of Larry G. Stuart and Mary E. Stuart to
$300.00, seconded by Supervisor Nickens and upon the following
recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Supervisor Brittle
A COPY - TESTE
-mil C~.~.~c f~ ~ . C2~u..eil
Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
6/10/87
CC: File
Sue Palmer,
Tim Gubala,
County Atto
Real Estate
Engineering
Department of Planning, Zoning & Grants
Assistant County Administrator
rney
Assessor
Department
ITEM NUMBER L' ~ r
NTY VIRG NIAMHELD AT THEHROANORE
COU
OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: June 9, 1987
SUB T; Appointments to Committees
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
1. Fifth Plannin District Commission: 1987.
ear term of Bob L. Johnson expires on June 30, and
The three-y
Mr. Johnson was filling tteVentoPthis Commissiontheriplease see the
is an elected representa
attached for further information.
~ planning Commission
re resenting the
The four-year unexpired term of Lee Eddy. phas resigned
Windsor Hills Magisterial District. Mr. E panted. His term
effective as soon as a replacement is app
expires 12/31/88• Please see the attached for further
information.
3. Recreation Commission:
representing the Cave Spring
The two year terms of Mr. Hugh Key. representing the Windsor
Magisterial District; NTr. W. E. Hoge, an at-large
Hills Magisterial District; and Michael J. Lazzuri, Bred, but
member expire June 30for98hreeOyearsal Please see theaa t ached for
new terms shall be
further information.
4. Vir inia Western Communit Colle e Board
lvia Faw and Mr. Stephen A.
The four-year terms of Mrs. SY
Musselwhite expire June 30, 1987. Mrs. Faw has served two terms
ible for another appointment. Mr. Musselwhite has
and is not elig be reappointed. Please see the
only served one term and may
attached for further information.
L~. / - ,~'
Submitted By:
Approved by:
~~ ~
Elmer C. Hodge
Mary H. Allen County Administrator
Deputy Clerk
---------------
---------------------- VOTE
------------ ACTION No Yes Abs
Approved ( ) Motion by: Brittle
Denied ( ~ Garrett
Received ( ) Johnson
Referred McGraw
To ~_ Nickens
L-~
FIFTH PLANNING DISTRICT COMMISSION
A. COMPOSITION
Commission to consist of five (5) representatives of
Roanoke County based on population, three representatives who
shall be elected members of the governing bodies, and two members
who shall be non-elected citizens. The term of office shall be
three years.
One of the members shall also serve on the Executive
Committee .
The Fifth Planning District Commission represents
participating local governments included in the geographic area
delineated by the Commonwealth of Virginia. The commission is
composed of 21 elected and citizen representatives of the
participating jurisdictions.
B, DUTIES
The purpose of the commission as defined by the Virginia
Area Development Act is "...to promote orderly and efficient
development of the physical, social and economic elements of the
District by planning, encouraging and assisting governmental
subdivisions to plan for the future."
The general management program category provides the
basic organization and management of commission activities and
routine administrative functions. Because general management
supports the entire operation of the commission's work program,
costs allocated to the program activity are generally considered
as administrative or indirect costs and charged to other program
categories in accordance with the Commission's Cost Allocation
Plan .
C.
MEETING SCHEDULE
Fourth Thursday of each month; held in Commission
Conference Room, at 3:00 p.m. (time subject to change.)
I L-
~~ /?,G~i
e.l ~~
145 W. CAMPBELL AVENUE~/% P.O. BOX 2569 ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24010
(703) 343-4417
GORDON N. DIXON
Executive Director
May 15., 1987
Ms. -Mary H . Allen , Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
P.O. Box 29800
Roanoke, Virginia 24018-0798
Dear Ms. Allen:
According to our record of appointments, the term of Mr. Bob Johnson, elected
representative of the County of Roanoke on the Fifth Planning District
Commission, expires June 30, 1987. The Commission Bylaws state that all
appointments are for three-year terms. Mr. Johnson is, of course, eligible for
reappointment.
Please notify the Commission of Roanoke County's official action in filling this
upcoming vacancy on the Commission. Thank you.
Yours truly,
y~
Gordon Dixon
Secretary to the Commission
/jlp
cc: Mr. Bob Johnson
Mr. Charles Hill, 5PDC Chairman
~J-
~~ "
ROANOKE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
A.
COMPOSITION
(Summarized from State Code 15.1-437)
To consist of not less than ra°of(Supe~visors;tall shallebe
(15) members, appointed by the Boa knowledge
ualified by rowth
residents of the county or municipality, q
erience to make decisions on questions of community g
and exp be a member of the governing
and development. One members may
body, and one may be a member of the administrative branch.
g, DUT_ IES: ulations
To exercise general supervision of-prescrgbe rug es
for the administration of its affairs; Su ervise its
P
pertaining to its investigations and hearings;
fiscal affairs and responsibilitiesK upder rules and regulations
ee a complete record of its
prescribed by the governing body; and preservation
proceedings and be responsibleMake recommendations and an annual
of its papers and documents; concerning the operation of the
report to the governing body urisdiction;
commission and the status of planning within its j
ublish and distribute reports, ordinances and other
Prepare, p prepare and submit an annual
material relating to its activates%the governing body of the
budget in the manner prescribed by committee or
county; If deemed advisable, establish an advisory
committees .
C, MEETING SCHEDULE:
Third Tuesday of each month at 7:30 p.m., Roanoke County
istration Center.
Adman
,~.. -~ z-
June 2, 1987
Mr. Bob L. Johnson, Chairman
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
P.O. Box 29800
Roanoke, Virginia 24018-0798
Dear Chairman Johnson:
This letter tenders my resignation from the Roanoke County
Planning Commission, effective as soon as a replacement can be
appointed. This resignation is directly related to my expected
nomination as a Republican candidate for the State Senate. I
forsee that the demands of the campaign will prevent my
participating in the affairs of the Planning Commission to the
extent that the position deserves.
I have deeply enjoyed being part of Roanoke County's
governmental process these past 2-1/2 years. I regret leaving the
Planning Commission when there are important and far-reaching
projects under way, such as the new zoning ordinance and the
Explore Project. If there is any way in which I can assist Roanoke
County in the future I most sincerely hope that you will call on
me.
As you probably know I have occasionally disagreed with some
of the long-range positions taken by the Board, the Commission and
the planning staff. I have always felt that differing views, when
offered responsibly and constructively, can help lead to the best
results. I have the highest regard for the sincerity and
dedication of the Commission and the Planning Department personnel.
My one parting recommendation is for the closer communication and
cooperation of the governing body and administration with critical
planning operations.
With best wishes for the future of Roanoke County, I am
Very truly yours,
~f
Lee B. Eddy
cc: Other Members, Board of Supervisors
Members, Planning Commission
/`Elmer Hodge
Tim Gubala
Rob Stalzer
L.-. --~.. ~'
RECREATION COMMISSION
A. COMPOSITION: (Resolution 85-151.N, September 10, 1985)
To be composed of two (2) members from each magisterial
district and one (1) member at large from the County. All
members to be appointed by the Board of Supervisors.
Original terms shall be staggered. Upon expiration of
their original terms, each succeeding term shall be for three (3)
years, expiring on June 30th.
B. DUTIES:
The Commission shall serve as the advisory body to the
Director of Parks and Recreation of Roanoke County; the
Commission shall suggest policies to the County Administrator and
the Board of Supervisors through the Director of Parks and
Recreation, within its powers and responsibilities as stated in
this resolution. The Commission shall serve as a liaison between
the Department of Parks and Recreation, the Board of Supervisors,
and the citizens of the community. The Commission will work
through the Parks and Recreation staff on all related matters.
The Commission shall consult with and advise recreation policies,
programs, personnel, finances, and the need for acquiring and
disposing of lands and. properties related to the total community
recreation program, and to its long-range, projected program for
recreation.
The Commission shall assume duties for the recreation
purposes as follows: Make recommendations (1) for the
establishment of a system of supervised recreation for the
County; (2) to set apart for use as parks, playgrounds,
recreation centers, water areas, or other recreation areas and
structures, any lands or buildings owned by or leased to the
County and for approval by the Board of Supervisors and may
suggest improvements of such lands and for the construction and
for the equipping and staffing of such buildings and structures
as may be necessary to the recreation program within those funds
allocated; (3) and advise in the acceptance by the County of any
grant, gift, bequest or donation, any personal or real property
offered or made available for recreation purposes and which it
judges to k~e of present Or possible future use or recreation.
Any gift, bequest of money or other property, any grant, devise
of real or personal property so acquired shall be held, by the
County, used and finally disposed of in accordance with the terms
under which such grant, gift or devise is made and accepted; (4)
and advise in the construction, equipping, operation and
maintenance of parks, playgrounds, recreation centers and all
buildings and structures necessary or useful to the Department
function, and will advise in regard to other recreation
facilities which are owned or controlled by the unit or leased or
loaned to the unit.
V - /
L-~
VIRGINIA WESTERN COMMUNITY COLLEGE BOARD
A. COMPOSITION:
To be as follows: minimum of nine (9) persons, not to
exceed fifteen (15) includes at least one (1) person from each
political subdivision sponsoring the college. County appointees
to consist of three (3) persons.
B. DUTIES•
1. Shall perform such duties with respect to the
operation of a community college.
2. Serve as channels of communication between the State
Board for Community College and governing bodies of
the local political subdivisions.,
3. Shall participate with the Chancellor of the
Community College System and the State Board of
Community Colleges in the selection, evaluation and
removal of the president of the community college.
4. Responsible for eliciting community participation in
program planning and development establishing local
citizens' advisory committees for specialized programs
and curricula and approving the appointments of all
members of these committees.
5. Shall review all new curricular proposals for the
community college.
6. Shall oversee the development and evaluations of the
community service program for the community college.
7. Shall review and make recommendations concerning the
biennial budget Program Proposal for the community
college as prepared by the college president.
8. Shall review and approve a detailed local funds budget
for the community college as prepared by the college
president.
9. Responsible for the review and approval of a budget
prepared by the college president for the expenditure
of revenues from vending commissions and auxiliary
enterprises, including the student activity fund.
10. Responsible for reviewing reports of audit and for
reviewing the college president's response to those
', reports of audit.
• /~(- !- 8
OF SUPERVISORS OF ROATOON
R MEETING OF THE BOARD COUNTY ADMINISTRA
AT A REGULA HELD AT THE ROANOK JUNE 9, 1987
COUNTY, VIRGINIA-CENTER ON TUESDAY-
p,ppROVINGF RTH
RESOLUTION iN•CERT IN ITEMS SET
CONCURRING OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA
ON THE BOARD ITEM N -
FOR THIS DANpADESIGNATED AS
CONSENT AGE of Roanoke
RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors
BE IT
Virginia. as follows: a enda of the
County, the g
1, That that certain section of
nated as Item N -
ervisors for June 9, 1987, desig
in as to
Board of Sup roved and concurred
hereby is- app Items 1
enda be, and section designated
Consent Ag forth in said
each item separately set
through 9- inclusive, as follows:
12, 1987
- April 28, 1987, May
1. Minutes of Meetings
relocate a Sanitary
vacate and Section #3•
2. AuthorEasementton Branderwood
Sewer Va. pepartment of from
from the of Route 1916
3. Notification of the addition and Route 1917
Transportation cul_de-sac into the
to a south cul-de-sac
Route 1832 to a southeast
from Route 1916
Secondary System. Hills
for a Fireworks Display permit from
4. Request
pepartment Store. the Blue
Resolution of 87Pp°pro~ect.
5• Approval of „pEpICATION
Ridge Parkway econdary System
into the S
Request for acceptance
6. for the following Roads: Lane and 0.13 miles of
0,15 miles of Beavers 0,14
a• Drive. Drive and
Elizabeth of Wing Co~nander
b. 0,17 miles Lane.
miles of Grape Tree Lane
0,05 miles of Shadow
c. of Hill Drive
d. O.lg miles of Indian gill Drive 0.26 miles
e. p,18 miles Dint Drive and
f. 0.26 miles of Airp
of Airpoint Road.
,' ~ ~w_--
g. 0.56 miles of Lakemont Drive
h. 0.04 miles of Memory Lane
i, Streets of LaBellevue Subdivision including
Forest Oak Drive, Coachman Circle, Coachman
Drive and Summit Ridge Road.
~. Acceptance of Sewer Facilities for Allred
Chevrolet
g, Approval to Request matching funds from the Va.
DepartmentvementsntooBolling Steelndustrial Access
Road Impro
2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized
and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said
items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to
this resolution.
AT A REGULAR MEETING OFATHTHEOROANOKESCOUNTYSADMINISTRATOON
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD 1987
CENTER ON TUESDAY, JUNE 9,
RESOLUTION NO. 6987-12 APPROVING AND
CONCURRING IN CER~-ITEMS SET FORTH
ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA
FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM N -
CONSENT AGENDA
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That that certain section of the agenda of the
Board of Supervisors for June 9, 1987, designated as Item N -
Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to
each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1
through 9, inclusive, as follows:
1. Minutes of Meetings - April 28, 1987, May 12, 1987
2. Authorization to vacate and relocate a Sanitary
Sewer Easement in Branderwood Section #3.
3. Notification from the Va. Department of
Transportation of the addition of Route 1916 from
Route 1832 to16 touahsoutheastaculndeRsaceinto7the
from Route 19
Secondary System.
4, Request for a Fireworks Display Permit from Hills
Department Store.
5. Approval of Resolution of Support for the Blue
Ridge Parkway "DEDICATION 87" Project.
6. Request for acceptance into the Secondary System
for the following Roads:
a. 0.15 miles of Beavers Lane and 0.13 miles of
Elizabeth Drive.
b, p.17 miles of Wing Commander Drive and 0.14
miles of Grape Tree Lane.
c, 0.05 miles of Shadow Lane
d. 0.18 miles of Hill Drive
e. 0.18 miles of Indian Hill Drive
f. 0.26 miles of Airpoint Drive and 0.26 miles
of Airpoint Road.
g. 0.56 miles of Lakemont Drive
h, 0.04 miles of Memory Lane
i. Streets of LaBellevue Subdivision including
Forest Oak Drive, Coachman Circle, Coachman
Drive and Summit Ridge Road.
~. Acceptance of Sewer Facilities for Allred
Chevrolet
g. Approval to Request matching funds from the Va.
Department of Transportation for Industrial Access
Road Improvements to Bolling Steel.
2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized
and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said
items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to
this resolution.
Supervisor Brittle asked that Item N-2 be removed for a
separate vote so that he may abstain.
On motion of Supervisor Johnson, with Item N-2 deleted
for a separate vote, seconded by Supervisor Garrett and upon the
following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson
NAYS: None
Supervisor McGraw moved approval of Item N-2, seconded
by Supervisor Garrett and upon the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson
NAYS: None
ABSTAIN: Supervisor Brittle
A COPY - TESTE
Mary H. llen, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
6/10/87
CC: File
Phillip Henry, Director of Engineering
John Peters, Assistant Director of Engineering
Clifford Craig, Director of Utilities
Tim Gubala, Assistant County Administrator
Brent Sheffler, Economic Development Specialist
~- /
April 28, 1987 _ ______
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
;; Itoanage~County Administration Center
3738 BrambletoniaVe24018SW
Roanoke, Virg'
April 28, 1987
"The Roanoke County"Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
Virginia, met this day at the Roanoke Count
County, and th
this being the second Tuesday,
Administration Center, of the month of April, 1987.
second regularly scheduled meeting
IN RE: CALL TO ORDER _-
hairman Johnson called the meeting to order at 3:04
C
p,m, The roll call was taken.
Johnson, Vice Chairman Lee
Chairman Bob L. H, Brittle,
MEMBERS PRESENT: Garrett, Supervisors C1Nickens
Steven A. McGraw, Harry
None
MEMBERS ABSENT: ~' Administrator; John
Elmer C. Hodge, County
STAFF PRESENT: I„1 , C h a m b l i s s r A s s i s t a n t C° u John
Administrator for Management Services;
R. Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator
of Public Facilities; Timothy W. Gubala,
Assistant County Administrator for
Community Development; Paul M. Mahoney,
County Attorney, Mary H. Allen, Deputy
Clerk; Clifford Craig, Director of
Utilities; Michael J. Lazzuri, Director o'
Court Services; Phillip Henry, Director o.
Engineer
I IN RE: OPENING CEREMONIES
The invocation was given by the Reverend Sam Crews,
Coopers Cove Baptist Church. The Pledge of Allegiance wa:
recited by all present.
IN RE: COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS
April. 28 ,, 19,87
None -
ESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA
IN RE : REQU
ZTEMS:
Chairman Johnson announced that Public Hearing 487-3,
petition of Charles and Ann Howard had been withdrawn.
:c -
IN RE: PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS AND AWARDS
ratulations to the vir inia
1, Resolution of Con
the Atlantic Coast Hocke Lea ue
Lancers for winnin Brabham
Chairman Johnson announced that Henry
c'ham ionshiP~ riot commitment and wa
owner of the Virginia Lancers had a P Lion of th
Supervisor Nickens moved adop
unable to be present. by Superviso
prepared resolution. The motion was seconded
Brittle.
RESOLUTION 4281 OF CONGRATUWINNOING
TO THETLANTICACOASTRHOCKEY LEAGUE
THE A
CHAMPIONSHIP
Lancers Hockey Team is the onl
WHEREAS, The Virginia and
with the County of Roanoke;
professional team associate
the team has been located in the Town °
WHEREAS, 84 season; and they hav
Vinton in Roanoke County since the 1983/
ht a sense of pride to all the citizens of Roanoke Count
broug lishments, and
accomp Hocke
for their outstanding inia Lancers
WHEREAS, attendance at the Vlrg ectators in 1984 to
town from an average of 1200 sP win-lo
games has 9 ame; and their
ectators at the fin1983/84 to 44-23 in 1986/8
record of 3,560 sP 45 in
record has improved from 19- ort; and
rowth of interest in that sp inia Lancers cape
contributing to g ril 10, 1987, the Virg Leag
WHEREAS. on Ap
winning the Atlantic Coast Hock3Yin t e
season by Valley Comets 4 to
an outstanding the Mohawk
championship beating
championship series.
April 28,:1987
----- _
NOWT THEREFORE BE IT REeXLressesa its pBodedand
Supervisors of Roanoke County P coach; and
Brabham, owner; John Tortorella,
appreciation to Henry team for an
the members of the Virginia Lancers Hockey
outstanding year; and
FURTHER, the Board o,~ _Su,pervisors of Roanoke Coun y
ratulations to all those associated with the Virginia
offers cong League
Lancers upon winning the Atlantic Coast Hockey
Championship. seconded by Supervisor
On motion of Supervisor Nickens,
Brittle, and upon the following recorded vote:
Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson
AYES:
NAYS: None
2, Presentation of the Certificate or h~..~..------
for Excellence in Audit
Reta Busher Director of the Bud et a announced that
Reportings County Administrator Elmer Hodg
34 localities in the State of Virginia have received this
only
Certificate and congratulated Ms. Busher on this honor.
IN RE: NEW BUSINESS
royal of the Resolution ado tin the Desi n
l• A Clifford
and Construction Standards fOrreaortedathattthis Proposed
Craig, Director of Utilities, P work
resolution was previously presented to the Board at a
session on March 10, 1987, and has been discussed at three other
ervisor Brittle and Supervisor McGraw were
,board meetings. Sup
appointed as a subcommittee to meet esehstanda dsmhavenbeen
Association to address their concerns. Th
reviewed by a committee comprised of staff members of the County
and Development
Utility, Engineering, Facilities, Fire,
Departments, as well as representatives from the Homebuilders
Association and engineering .and surveying firms.
April 28, 1987
- ---
I
Supervisor Brittle announced that he and Supervisor
McGraw had met with the Homebuilders and County staff members.
Their concern was primarily the fire flow requirement. Several
as a result of the meeting. The
issues were cleared uP and that a
subcommittee recommends adoption of the resolution,
system of monitoring be established for six months to monitor the
(results of the standards.
Lewis Jamison, President of the Homebuilders
Association was present to speak. The Homebuilders supports a
and appreciate the
good water system for Roanoke 'County
~nnortunity to monitor this for six month to see if there are any
problems.
Steve Strauss of"Strauss Construction pointed out that
the water' connection fees were Yecentiy raised~to'$1036 and will
take affect this year, and asked what the homebuilder was
stated it would include fire protection.
getting, since the policy fee.
Mr. Craig responded that this fee was an off-site facility
The County will credit the developer up to half his off-site
facility. If his cost exceeds that he may request the other half
and the Board may approve this. Mr. Strauss stated the present
fees are based of the cost to provide facilities. The fee is to
provide domestic service and fire protection. The developer was
;,led to believe this fee would cover full service. John Hubbard
stated this fee is for the County to provide the service, and the
romise. Mr. Strauss should not expect the fund
fee was a comp nine months
for the entire system to be collected in only
Mr. Straus requested that the resolution be adopted for
six-month trial basis and brought back before the board at th
end of that period.
Supervisor Brittle moved to approve the resolutic
adopting the design and construction standards for Ovate
facilities, and that the staff monitor the results over a perm
of six months. The motion was seconded by Supervisor McGraw.
nl
r
>d
Ild
f
April 28, 1987
RESOLUTION 42887-2 ADOPTING DESIGN AND
CONSTRUCTION ARDS FOR WATER
FACILITIES
WHEREAS, the Utility Director and other County staff have
eveloped certain design and construction standards for water
acilities; and
WHEREAS, these design and construction standards may be
.dopted by resolution by the Board of Supervisors pursuant to
section 20.1-11 of the 1971 Roanoke County Code (Chapter 22 of
.he 1985 Roanoke County Code); and
WHEREAS, these design and construction standards for water
facilities shall take effect as of the date of this resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED bey the Board of Supervisors
of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That the attached design and construction standards for
water facilities are incorporated herein by reference; and
2. That these standards are effective immediately and app1Y
to all water utility plans which have not been accepted for re-
view by the Department of Development prior to March 25, 1987;
provided said plans, in the review process, received final approv-
al by the County within 60 days of the effective date of these
standards.
On motion of 'Supervisor Brittle, seconded by Supervisor
McGraw, and upon the following recorded vote:
Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson
AYES:
NAYS: None
2, Re uest for A royal of Fundin Allocations for
Utility Capital Projects: Clifford Craig reported that th
rojects are in various stages of design an
current p
construction. Two of the items were overbudgeted by $168,031
The staff is requesting that these funds be allocated to tY
1987/88 Replacement/Improvement Projects. This will give
total of $368,037 available for this program. Mr. Craig review
~i~
e
a
'd
April 28, 1987 _
the status of both the current projects and the projects planned
for 1987/88.
.Supervisor McGraw asked when the North Lakes water
system connection toward Cove Road will be completed. Mr. Craig
responded that this should be complete before June. He also
described the problems that may result when this is complete.
Supervisor Johnson moved to approve the staff
recommendation. The motion was seconded by Supervisor McGraw and
~I
carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson
NAYS: None
3, Authorization to Execute a Detention Home
(Contract with the City of Roanoke: Michael Lazzuri, Director
of Court Services advised the Board that in 1986 the City of
Roanoke canceled all existing contracts and submitted a new one
for counties and cities, using_the,ir detention facilities. The
rate has risen to $32._87 per day for secure detention, and $7.44
per day for the outreach program. Roanoke County also has a
contract with the New River Valley Detention Commission at a
charge of $20.00 per day, on a space available basis. However,
juveniles are frequently moved after one day from that facility
to the Roanoke City facility. Mr. Lazzuri requested that the
Board authorize the County Administrator to execute the contract
with the City of Roanoke. He also estimated that additional
~ifunds in the amount of $7,740 will be needed for 1986/87
detention care.
Supervisor Nickens moved that the County Administrator
be authorized to execute the contract with the City of Roanoke
and that $8,000 from the Board Contingency fund be allocated fog
detention. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Brittle an.
carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson
NAYS: None
April 28, 1987
------
-_---- --
IIA
Ic
4. A royal to amend the Weed and Trash Ordinance:
ssistant County Administrator Timothy Gubala stated a recent
ourt case was brought to General District Court and the case was
brown out because of weaknesses in the ordinance. The
ommonwealth's Attorney has requested that the ordinance be
.mended to make it more enforceable.
Supervisor McGraw moved ,to approve the amendments to
.he ordinance and schedule the necessary readings. The motion
aas seconded by Supervisor Nickens and carried by the following
recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson
NAYS: None
ABSENT: None
Anthony
5 Claim of Robin Renee Iddings:
F. Anderson, attorney for Robin Renee Iddings, was present to
file a claim on her behalf for aggravation of injuries sustained
as a result of alleged negligence of a County employee. This is
an exhaustion of administrative remedies and procedural steps
required for filing a legal action against the County.
Supervisor Johnson moved to deny Miss Iddings claim.
The motion was seconded by Supervisor Nickens and carried by the
following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson
NAYS: None
ABSENT: None
IN RE: REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS
None
IN RE: REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC BEARINGS
April 28, 1987
None
N RE: APPOINTMENTS
1. Ad Hoc Committee for the Count Members of the
e Tonal Air ort Commission: Supervisor Brittle asked that
ppointments to this committee be postponed until further notice.
N RE: REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS
Supervisor Garrett announced that he would like to
emove the petition of Springwood_Associates from the table to be
eard as soon as possible. County Attorney Paul Mahoney
ecommended it be heard at the next evening session when other
•e zonings are heard, and that a legal notice be published.
supervisor Garrett also requested that the Deputy Clerk notify
9r. Freeman of the hearing date.
Supervisor Garrett also moved that the staff request
the Va. Department of Transportation for "No Parking" signs in
he vicinity of the Castle Rock Swim Club. The motion was
econded by Supervisor McGraw and carried by a unanimous voice
e.
Supervisor Nickens announced that the CORTRAN Task
~rce met recently, and established goals such as keeping the
rogram going, asking the private sector for funds, and pursuing
^y federal or state funding available. Another meeting is
cheduled, and the task force will be expanded.
Supervisor Johnson presented a proposed resolutio
rom the Clean Valley Council. They are requesting that th
~.
April 28, 1987
__. __
_- __-
__
--- - - -
C
C
~ t
aunty participate in their recycling project at no cost to the
ounty. He requested staff to investigate their request, and
ring back an agenda item at the next Board meeting.
Supervisor Johnson also wished to state for the record
.hat he has visited the Palm Valley area, the Back Creek and
Markey Road area, the Green Valley area, and Kentland Drive to
issess the flood damage recently. He directed staff to study the
irainage and flood problems in Roanoke County and bring a report
back to the Board with possible solutions, and the costs
a s s o c i a t e d w i t h t h e s e s o l u t i o n s.
IN RE: CONSENT AGENDA
Supervisor Nickens stated that Resolution on Item 2
should include Botetourt County. With that addition, he moved
approval of the Consent Agenda. The motion was seconded by
Supervisor Brittle
RESOLUTION NO. 42887-6 APPROVING AND
CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH
FOR THISBDATED DESIGNATEDIASRITEMEJDA
CONSENT AGENDA
gE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1, That that certain section of the agenda of the
Board of Supervisors for April 28, 1987, designated as Item J -
Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as tc
each item separately set forth in said section designated Items
through 4, inclusive, as follows:
1, Minutes of Meeting - March 24, 1987.
2, p,pproval of a Clean Valley Committee Anti-Litter
Grant Application.
3, Acceptance of a deed conveying the sewer lines in
Merriman Estates.
4, Acceptance of a deed conveying the water and sewe.
lines in Plantation Estates.
April 28, 1987
ai
i
~t
F
F
1
2, That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized
~d directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said
:ems the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to
its resolution. Supervisor
On motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by
rittle, and upon the following recorded vote:
Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson
.YES:
IAYS : None
LN RE: REPORTS
Supervisor Nickens noted that Item L-1, Board
Contingency Fund is now down to $30,930. The following reports
were received and filed:
1, Board Contingency Fund
2. General Operating Fund Income and Expense Analysis
for the Month ended March 31, 1987.
3. Unappropriated balance as of April 14, 1987
4, Development Data Report - First Quarter 1987
IN RE: EXECUTIVE SESSION
At 4:10 p.m., Supervisor Nickens moved to go intc
Executive Session pursuant to the Code of Virginia Sectio
2.1-344 (a) (1) to consider a personnel matter. The motion wa
seconded by Supervisor Garrett.
IN RE: OPEN SESSION
At 5:00 p.m., Supervisor Johnson moved to return t
Open Session. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Brittle an
carried by a unanimous vote.
April 28, 1987
--- --¶ --
_ - --- it
I
V RE: DINNER RECESS
At 5:01 p.m., Chairman Johnson declared a recess forll
dinner.
:N RE: CALL TO ORDER _..
At 7:04 p.m., Chairman Johnson called the meeting backll
to order.
IN RE: FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES
1, Ordinance amendin Article 2 of Cha ter 5
"Animals and Fowl" of the Roanoke Count Code re uirin the
County Attorney
Vaccination of Cats to Prevent Rabies:
Paul Mahoney reported that at the April 14, 1987 meeting, Chief
Animal Control Officer Kenneth Hogan submitted a report and draft
ordinance recommending a Rabies prevention program. Even though
the Board members had questions at that time, they recommended
that the draft ordinance go through the first and second reading
process.
Supervisor Nickens stated he was concerned that this
ordinance would be difficult to enforce, but was aware it was
important to keep Rabies from coming into the County. Supervisor
Johnson pointed out that if an ordinance exists, at least the
public would be aware of the spread of rabies. Even voluntary
compliance would help confine the spread.
Supervisor McGraw moved the first reading of the
ordinance. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Johnson.
Supervisor Nickens asked Mr. Hogan how complaints wil
be handled. Mr. Hogan responded that if there is no vaccinatio
for an animal, a summons will be issued, and the citizen mus
bring the vaccination record to court.
April 28, 1987
---
- ---
The motion carried by the following recorded vote:
YES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson
IAYS: None
ABSENT: None
2. Ordinance acce tin Deed of Easement from Urban
Develo went and Investment Ltd.: Mr. Mahoney reported this
was to provide an ordinance authorizing an acceptance of a deed
of easement for Urban Development and Investment, Ltd. for water
and sanitary sewer easements. He noted a correction on the
ordinance.
Supervisor Garrett moved to approve the first reading
of the ordinance. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Johnson
and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson
NAYS: None
IIABSENT: None
IN RE: SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES
1. Ordinance acce tin a draina a easement from the
Trustees of the Fort Lewis Christian Church: Mr. Mahoney
stated this ordinance would authorize the Board to accept this
easement from the Church. It is necessary to provide drainage
from streets in the Fort Lewis Village Subdivision to allow them
to be accepted into the Secondary System. The cost will be
$120.00 from the subdivision bond. Mr. Mahoney advised that
previously the Church had donated the easement. They later
rescinded that action and decided to request payment.
Supervisor McGraw moved to rescind the previous actioi
and approve the second reading of the ordinance. The motion wa:
seconded by Supervisor Nickens and carried by the following
~~recorded vote:
April 28, 1987
__ __.--
-_
IIC
EASEMENT FROM8THE7TRUSTEESN OF T EIFORT
LEWIS CHRISTIAN CHURCH
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
ounty, Virginia, as follows:
1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of
he Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading on the acquisition
.f the hereinafter-described real estate was held on April 14,
.987. A second reading on this matter was held on April 28, 1987.
Che real estate to be acquired is a drainage easement of variable
width across Lots 4 and 5, Section 1 of the Samuel White Farm and
is located in the City of Salem; and
2. That the conveyance of the drainage easement from
the trustees of the Fort Lewis Christian Church to the Board of
Supervisors of Roanoke County for the sum of One Hundred Twenty
($120.00) is hereby authorized and approved; and
3. That the County Administrator is authorized to exe-
cute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke
County as are necessary to accomplish the conveyance of this pro-
perty, all of which shall be upon form approved by the County
Attorney.
On motion of Supervisor McGraw to rescind previous
action and approve ordinance, seconded by Supervisor Nickens.
AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson
NAYS: None
ABSENT: None
2. Ordinance amendin Section 20.1-11 of the Roanoke
Count Code (1971) b the re eal of subsection (a) (b) and (c)
ertainin to certain standards and s ecifications: Mr.
Mahoney stated this ordinance must be adopted concurrently witl
the resolution adopted in the afternoon session concerning the
Design and Construction Standards for Water Facilities. Th
first reading was held on March 10th. The second reading wa
continued from March 24, 1987. The effective date of thi
s
p,pril 28, 1987
ors
th
ca
o'
1987, even though the effective date of
finance is April 28, was a
o Resolution is March 24, 1987. He also noted there
rrection on the ordinance. ~~~ second reading
Supervisor Johnson moved to aPPr~~~
the ordinance. The motion was seconded by Supervisor McGraw.
ORDINAi COF 4TH--E 7R~ANOKEDCOUNTYCCODE
20.1 1
(1971) BY THE REPEAL OF SUB-SECTIO
(TANDARDSAAND(SPECIFICATIONS TO CERTAIN
S
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 0
a first reading of this ordinanc
the Charter of Roanoke County, reading was held on Marc
was held on March 10, 1987, a second
ublic hearing was held thereo
24, 1987 and April 28, 1987,and a P an ordinanc
ril 28, 1987, concerning
on March 24, 1987 and Ap Cod
ortions of the Roanoke County
amending and repealing P drants; and
valves and hY
pertaining to the design of water mains,
ter 20, "Water," of th
WHEREAS, Section 20.1-11 of Chap the 198
22, "Water," of
1971 Roanoke County Code (Chapter s ecifica
Roanoke County Code) provides for certain standards and P
fire hydrants; and
tions for water mains, valves and
ecifications conflic
WHEREAS, said standards and sp
ertain proposed "Design and Construction Standards fo
with c
Water Facilities , and ^Design and Construction Sta
WHEREAS, said proposed t
were adopted y resolution of
„• b
dards for Water Facilities" contemporaneou
ervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia,
Board of Sup
ly with the adoption of this ordinance• the Board of Superv'-
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by
Virginia, as follows:
sors of Roanoke Coun y.
20,1-11 of the Roanoke County Co e
1, That Section to read and Pr
(1971) is amended and portions thereof repealed
vide as follows:
Sec. 20.1-11. Design of mains; valves and hydrants.
~:
April 28, 1987
be
th
fc
t:
a~
la
All mains, valves, hydrants, fittings and accessories shall
designed to withstand a normal working pressure of not less
an one hundred and fifty pounds per square inch and shall con-
rm to the specifications of -the American Water works Associa-
.on, state regulations and county specifications and standards
iopted by the board by resolution and in effect at the time of
~proval.
{a{ Mains: Mains sha}} be six inehesz inside dlameterz ex-
eptrn the ease of dead-end streets er Nhere used Para}}e} to
~tx inch Mains or }arger n-alns }coated Nithtn the same street of
sight-of-way: }n ne ease aha}} any v-ater main be }ess than fear
No water main serving one er mere fire
Enehesz Inatde diameter: ~nsta}-
hydrants sha}} be }ess than aix tnehesz tnatde diameter:
}atten of a hydrant en existing }tees with an inside diameter
the director- A}} dead-
}ess than six Inches mast be approved by
end water mama sha}} have adequate b}eN-e£f va}veeeifieattens
drants at the end thereof in aeeerdanevea}tle'hs~ }} be testa}}ed at
and standards- Automatic arr re}tef
the high points of water mains where aeeumu}atten of air may
Interfere with the f}ew: £aeh va}ve
{b} va}ves- A}} va}vea sha}~ epee to the }e£t-
eratien with standard ve}ve key through
sha}} be aeeeaaib}e for op
a va}ve box extending to the greand surface.-
{e} £ire Hydrants.- Hydrants sha}} have two two and enc-ha}~
Inch nezz}es and one fear and one-ha}f inch pan+per nezz}e
revided with snitab}e gaskets to provide
nezz}e caps aha}} be p ehalne
tight seat Kith the nezz}es- 5ueh caps sha}} be secure}y
drants: Eap Hats sha}} have the sae
to the Barre} of the by the size of t1
dimensions as the operating nut of the hydrant:
main va}ve opening of the hydrant aha}} be net }ess then four a
one-ha}f inches: the hydrant sha}} connect to a six Inch bran
PIPe }ine to which Ia }coated an Ise}sting gate va}ve: Hydrae
aha}} be }Oeated not mere than two}ve feet from the edge of t
cu
~e
id
-h
is
he
Apra} ~$~ }98~ -----
:ve~nent nn}ess anther}aed by direeterc ~n Mater s7ste~ns serving
sbdsv4siens= fire hydrants sha}} be testa}}ed so that there wt}}
e at }east ene hydrant vr4th4n four hundred feet of the een atemf
}sne of each }ot served by such s7
he front property
lydrants sha}} be }oeated at street interseet4onsT sf Pesstb}e-
-6rd- Ne- }5}~-}
2. That the effective date of this ordinance shall be
pril 28, 1987• Supervisor
On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by
cGraw, and upon the following recorded vote:
Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson
YES:
AYS: None
N RE: PUBLIC HEARINGS
IIg87-1 PETITION OF APPALACHIAN POWER COMPANY
r REQUESTING REZONING FROM B-1 OFFICE TO
M-2 GENERAL INDUSTRIAL AND FROM M-2
GENERAL INDUSTRIAL TO B-1 OFFICE OF A 47
THE CATAWBA MAG STERIAL DISTRICTEN ROAD IN
APP~D
Supervisor McGraw stated he would abstain from a vote
n this matter because of ownership of property adjacent to the
etitioner.
Assistant County Administrator Timothy Gubala announced
hat this petition previously came to the Board in 1986. At that
ime, there was a questions concerning where the office building
ould be. Since then, the site plan has been worked out, and it
's necessary to amend the zoning. The Planning Commissior
ecommended unanimous approval of this petition. Mr. Layman anc
thers from Appalachian Power were present to answer questions.
Supervisor Johnson asked if the screening and bufferin
as to begin immediately. Mr. Layman responded that the Proffe
~f Condition includes this. Supervisor Johnson moved to approv
~he petition. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Garrett.
3'
r
e
April 28, 1987
_._~
--
---
-- ---
FINAL ORDER
ua
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDERED that portions of the
forementioned parcel of land, which is contained in Roanoke
ounty tax maps as parcel 36.10-1-14 be rezoned from B-1 (Office)
.o M-2 (General Industrial) District and that other portions be
rezoned from M-2 (General Industrial) to B-1 (Office) District
vith the result that the portion of the land zoned B-1 shall be
is described in Schedule A attached hereto and the portion of the
Land zoned M-2 shall be as described on Schedule B attached
hereto, all subject to the following conditions:
(p,) The portion of the land rezoned M-2 (General Industrial
District) will not be used for any of the following:
(1) Manufacture, compounding, processing, packaging or
treatment of such products as bakery goods, candy, cosmetics,
dairy products, drugs, perfumes, pharmaceuticals, perfumed toilet
soap, toiletries and food products;
(2) Manufacture of pottery and figurines or other
similar ceramic products, using only previously pulverized clay,
and kilns fired only by electricity or gas;
(3) Manufacture of musical instruments, toys, novelties
and rubber and metal stamps;
(9) Seed and feed stores;
(5) Cabinet, furniture and upholstery shops;
(6) Veterinary hospital and commercial kennels with
exterior runs and yards;
(7) Commercial laundry and dry cleaning plants;
(8) Flea markets;
(9) Brick manufacturing plants and sawmills;
(10) Cotton spinning mills;
(11) Boat building;
(12) Stone works
April 28, 1987
----Tf _ -
(B) In connection with its development of the subject
roperty, Appalachian Power Company will landscape the property
ubstantially in accordance with the Conceptual Planting Plan
ttached hereto, identified by drawing number SKA-4002C PL and
ated March 3, 1987. Those areas labeled "proposed planting" on
he Planting Plan will be landscaped at the time of initial site
~~
rading so as to comply with the Type E" requirements of the
oanoke County Screening and Buffering Ordinance (section
1-92.g., Roanoke County Code).
(C) (1) If Appalachian Power Company has not, by February 1,
991, commenced construction of improvements on the portion of
he land rezoned M-2 (General Industrial District) in accordance
ith a site plan approved by the appropriate Roanoke County
fficials, and if no extension of such deadline is granted
y Roanoke County on request of Appalachian Power Company,
ppalachian Power Company will promptly offer the entire 47+ acre
arcel for sale at its appraised fair market value as zoned B-1
j~~nd M-2.
(2) If Appalachian Power Company has not, by February.
1993, commenced construction of improvements on the portion of
he land rezoned B-1 (Office District) in accordance with a site
lan approved by the appropriate Roanoke County officials, and if
o extension of such deadline is granted by Roanoke County on
request of Appalachian Power Company, Appahachian Power
ompany will promptly offer the portion of the land rezoned B-1
for sale at its appraised fair market value as zoned B-1.
Legal Description of Property:
(a) The portion of land rezoned B-1 (Office District)
is described in Schedule A attached.
(b) The portion of the land rezoned M-2 (Genera:
Industrial District) is described in Schedule B attached.
BE IT FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this order b
transmitted to the Secretary of the Planning Commission and tha
4
r
Ilh
April 28, 1987
e be directed to reflect that change on the Official Zoning Map
f Roanoke County. on the
ADOPTED on motion of Supervisor Johnson and up
'ollowing recorded vote:
Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, Nickens, Johnson
AYES
JAYS : None
ABSTAIN: Supervisor McGraw
HEDUL_E A: Description of Property Rezoned B-1 (Office
District)
BEGINNING at ri htnof way line ofnLoch1HavenpDrivepat
located in the northerly g ro erty now or formerly of Donald E.
the southwest corner of the p p ri ht
Davis (Deed Book 939, page 18); thence with the nortcourses and
of way line of Loch Haven Drive the following
distances: S. 570 55' 32" W 89.97 feet to an iron pin
S. 38° 58' 32" W• monumenteet to a concrete highway
S. 48° 40' S0" W. 156.52 feet to a concrete highway
monument;
S. 63° 55' 18" W. 223.70 feet to a concrete highway
„ monument;
thence leaving the northerly right of way line of Loch Haven
Drive S. 13° O1' 24 E 40.00 feet to a p.k. nail in the center of
Loch Haven Drive thence with the center of Loch Haven Drive the
following courses and distances: 176,53 feet to a p.k. nail;
S, 76° 03' W• 244.38 feet to a p.k. nail;
S. 76° 37' 48" W.
with a curve to the right having an arc distance of
45.00 feet, a radius of 715:8780 25t'Wan44•ghfeetoto
chord of said curve being
a point;
thence leaving Loch Haven Drive and thehfollowinge courrses and
property of Appalachian Power Company,
distances:
245.00 feet to a point;
o
N. 07 55 172,00 feet to a point;
o
N. 52 05~ 145.00 feet to a point;
N. 18° 45 W. 753.00 feet to a point;
o "
N. 44 32' 23" E. 207.89 feet to a concrete
o er in, corner
monument with°fcGPatton E. wells;
to property
thence running with the lands of Gratton E. wells N. 79° 13' 04
E. 335.00 feet to an old pin, commoe 30)nand DonaldhE.lDa ai ~ Dee
Bookr939,spageDlBa;Bthence0wi hgthe Davis lands S. 6° 15~ E
282,20 feet (passing a concrete monument with copper Pin a
232.20 feet) to a concrete monument with copper pin in th
northerly right of way line of Loch Have Drive, the point c
BEGINNING, being shown on a plat entitled "Survey for th
Appalachian Power Company showing 46.40 Acre Tract Property <
3
t
e
f
e
f
f.
April 28, 1987
-- --
-- --r-
Levi A. Hoffman Estate," dated December 2, 1985, made by T. P.
Parker & Son, Engineers and Surveyors, Ltd. (revised March 4,
1986)
B: Description of Property Rezoned M-2
BEGINNING at an old planted stone located near a rock
all, which said old planted stone mlandsaofrPaultR.cMyers, Lot 2~,
o the herein described property,
orris Subdivision, in lands of Gratton E. Wells; thence leaving
aid point of BEGINNING and running with the common boundary
fnGrattoneEn Wellsathehfollowing two (2)pcoursesyandddistancesnds
S. 76° 47' 02" E 163.0 feet toin,candrete monument
with copper p
N. 67° 45' 00" E• w~thOcoppertpin;concrete monument
:hence running partly with the common boundary line between the
paid herein described property and lands of Ellis L. Wells and
running partly with other lands of Gratton E. Wells S.e2r3 p4n;
30: E. 561.60 feet to a concrete monument with cope
thence leaving the line °alachiannPowere Companywthe following
through the property of App
courses and distances:
S. 44° 32' 23" W. 207.89 feet
t to
to a point;
oint;
a
S. 710 15'
' W. 753.00
00
145 fee
feet to p
a point;
S. 18°
52° 45
05' E.
E. .
172.00 feet to a point;
S.
S. 7° 55' W. 245.00 feet to a point - in the
Drive;
center of Loch Haven
thence, running with the said center of Loch Haven Drive the
following courses and distances:
with a curve to the right having an arc distance of
147.48 feet, a radius of 718.87 feet, and the long
II chord of said curve being S. 86° 06' W. 147.22 feet
to a p.k. nail;
N. 88° Ol' 44" W. 107.06 feet to a p.k.nail;
N. 87° 11' 30" w. 229..06 feet to a p.k.nail;
thence leaving the center of Loch Haven Drive N. 22° 54' E. 39.01
feet to a concrete highway monument in the northerly right of way
line of Loch Haven Drive; thence with the northerly right of way
lines of Loch Haven Drive and Virginia Route 419 the following
courses and distances:
N. 75° 41' 10" W. 109.99 feet to a concrete
highway monument;
g. 74° 39' S0" W. 68.12 feet to a concrete highway
monument;
with a curve to the right having an arc distance of
207.77 feet, a radius of 798.51 feet, and the lonc
chord of said curve being N. 78° 13' 20" w. for a
distance of 207.19 feet to an iron pin;
N. 56° 33' 24" W. 105.30 feet to an iron pin;
N. 62° 32' 56" W. 166.18 feet to a concrete highway
monument;
N. 78° 15' 18" W. 95.33 feet to an iron pin; and
N. 65° 02' S6" W. 227.79 feet to a concrete
monument with a copper pin;
fence leaving said northerly right of way line of Virginia Route
.9 and running partly with the common boundary line of said
rein described property and lands of Raymond D. Hinchee and
inning partly with the lands of Gary R. Myers the following two
2) courses and distances:
N. 300 10' E passing a concrete monument with
copper pin at a distance °n all a
30.00 feet and running
total distance of 71.62 feet to a
concrete monument with copper
pin; and
N, 510 27' E. 834.00 feet to a concrete
monument with copper pin;
:hence, running with the common boundary line of the said herein
iescribed property and said lands of Paul R. Myers N. 470 31~the
263.00 feet to an old planted stone located near a rock wally for
point of BEGINNING, being shown on a plat entitled "Survey
Appalachian Power Co. showing 46.40 Acre Tract Property of Levi
A. Huffman Estate," dated December 2, 1985, made by T. P. Parker
& Son, Engineers and Surveyors, Ltd. (Revised March 4, 1986.)
tl
4:
h
r
487_2 PETITION OF GERHARD SIGRIST REQUESTING
AMENDMENT OF CONDITIONS OF A TRACT
CONTAINING 0.76 ACRES AND LOCATED ON
ROUTE 221 IN THE WINDSOR HILLS
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT.
APPS D
Mr. Gubala noted this was previously heard by the Board
of Supervisors in January of 1986. At that time a fast food
restaurant was proposed and the property was rezoned B-2 with
the owners have found
proffered conditions. Since that time, lans to put a
another client to use the property. Mr. Sigrist p
sewing machine sales and service facility on the property, anc
wishes to amend the conditions of the original rezonrof.fere~
Planning Commission recommended approval with p
conditions.
Heywood Fralin was present to represent the petitioner
Mr. Fralin stated there had been concern with the number o
entrances on Brambleton Avenue. The petom Brambleton Avenue
proffer that only one entrance will come fr
There may be an additional entrance from the side street.
Supervisor Garrett moved to approve the petiti~
I with proffered conditions. The motion was seconded by Supervis
a
in
or
McGraw.
April 28, 1987
_ __ ~_--
_---- _ -
FINAL ORDER
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDERED that the aforementioned
parcel of land which is contained in the Roanoke County tax Maps
as Parcel 77,09-4-42,43 and 44 and recorded in Deed Book and
legally described below be amended by B-2 District to B-2
Conditional District.
East 50' of Lot 8, all of Lot 9
and 10, D. B. Ferguson Map
BE IT FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this order be
transmitted to the Secretary of the Planning Commission and that
he be directed to reflect that change on the official zoning map
of Roanoke County.
ADOPTED on motion of Supervisor Garrett and upon the
following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson
NAYS: None
PROFFER OF CONDITIONS
1, The westerly 100' of the parcel will be used for a
sewing machine sales and service facility.
2, The building housing the sewing machine sales and
service will be consistent with the design of the existing
property bounded on the westerly side of the rezoned parcel.
3, No portion of the property will be used for any of the
following:
(a) Public billiard parlors and poolrooms, bowling
alleys, golf driving ranges and similar forms o
public amusement
(b) Animal hospitals or clinics and commercial kennels.
(c) Home for adults
April 28, 1987
- -
----
-----R -
uo
(d) Hospitals, hospital special care or nursing home.
(e) Flea markets
(f) Undertaker establishment
(g) General advertising billboards
4, Only one (1} entrance of reasonable width will be cut
Ef of Brambleton Avenue to serve the two proposed 100' parcels.
487-3
PETITION OF CHARLES AND ANN HOWARD FOR
A SPECIAL EXCEPTION PERMIT TO OPERATE A
THENCATAWBAUMAGISTERIALODDSTRICTDRIVE IN
WITHDRAWN
Chairman Johnson announced that the petitioner has
withdrawn this request.
IN RE: CITIZENS COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS
Chairman Johnson announced that since there were many)
citizens present to address the Board, he was imposing a
three-minute time limit.
The following residents of the Windsor West area of
Southwest County spoke on the drainage, flooding, and sewer
problems in their neighborhood.
1. Diana L. Smith, 2534 Willowlawn Street S. W•
2. Anita J. Caldwell, 2526 Willowlawn Street S. W•
3. Robert Tennant, 3716 Kentland Drive S. W•
4. Ellen Wallace, 36626 Kentland Drive S. W•
5. Zane Altice, 3617 Kentland Drive S. W•
6. Gene Curbow, 3637 Kentland Drive S. W•
7. Victoria V. Holpe, 3438 South Park Circle S. W•
g. Lisa Bennettr 3606 Kentland Drive S. W•
The following residents of the Palm Valley/Sun Valle
and other areas of Northwest and Northeast County spoke on tk
drainage, flooding and sewer problems in their area.
Y
.e
APril 28, 1987
1. R. M. Easley, 1202 Nover Avenue N. W.
2. Jack R. Hurd, 113 Verndale Dr. N. E.
3. Daniel R. Otey, 5346 Palm Valley Rd. N. E.
4. Minnie Reynolds, 30 Orlando Avenue N. E.
5. Janice Mitchell, 30 Orlando Avenue N. E.
6. Palmer Black, 5336 Palm Valley Rd. N. E.
Mr. Gene Curbow presented a petition signed by
F Supervisors
residents in both areas requesting that the boar ~~
establish funding for drainage, cleanup, sewer and flooding
prc~c~ic.«~ .
Chairman Johnson advised the residents that the Army
Corps of Engineers is now studying Mason's Creek, Carvin's Creek
nd Tinker Creek.
The Board of Supervisors directed County Administrator
Elmer Hodge and staff, along with two board members to ascertain
the problems, and to prepare a program of action, both short-term
and long-term. Chairman Johnson requested that a report be
brought back to the board in thirty days.
Supervisor Nickens moved to direct the County Attorney
to take the appropriate legal steps to increase the vehicle decal
fee by the maximum allowed on July 1, 1987, and that $200,000 of
G
~Ithese funds be allocated to solve the drainage and flooding
roblems. The motion was seconded by Supervisor McGraw.
Mr. Hodge requested that the Board wait thirty days
ntil the report is prepared before taking this action.
upervisor Nickens responded that he felt the Board should begir
taking some action immediately to correct the problems.
The motion carried by the following recorded vote:
YES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson
AYS: None
f:
April 28, 1987
MaY 12, 1987
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
Roanoke County Administration Center
3738 Brambleton1ape24018SW
Roanoke, Virg
MaY 12, 1987
Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
The Roanoke County Roanoke County
County, Virginia, met this day at the
the first Tuesday, and the
Administration Center, this being
,first regularly scheduled meeting of the month of May, 1987.
IN RE; CALL TO ORDER
Chairman Johnson called the meeting to order at 3:00
p.m, The roll call was taken.
Johnson, Vice Chairman Lee
Chairman Bob L• H, Brittle,
Garrett, Supervisors A1Nickens
MEMBERS PRESENT: Harry C•
Steven A. McGraw,
None John ~
MEMBERS ABSENT: e County Administrator;
Elmer C. Hodg , C o u n t y
Assistant John
STAFr PRESENT: M, C h a m b l i s s~ ement Services;
AdministratAssistant County Administrator
R. Hubbard, Timothy W. Gubala,
Facilities; f or
of Public County Administrator
Assistant Development; Paul M. Mahoney.
Community Mary H, Allen, Deputy
County Attorney, Director of Human
Clerk; D. Keith Claytor, Department of
Resources; Kathy
Human Resources
IN RE: OPENING CEREMONIES
The invocation was given by the Reverend Arthur Grant,
odlawn United Methodist Church. The Pledge of Allegiance was
40
recited by all present.
IN RE: COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS
May 12 , 19 87 _______
-- _
Administrator, reported that the
Elmer C. Hodge, County _
dent Government Day activities were very successful.
to
REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF
N RE:
GENDA ITEMS
E_3, Request for
Chairman Johnson added Item
Elementary School and
supplemental Literary Loans for Glenvar S c h o o l.
M a s o n' s C o v e E l e m e n t a r y
E: PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS AND AWARDS
IN R
Strickland, a member
Chairman Johnson introduced Wayne
ter of the American
of the Board of Directors of the Virginia Chap
Association (VAPA). Mr. Strickland announced that each
planning
the VAPA honors projects and individuals that demOThis year,
year lanning profession.
high level of excellence in the p
e County entered Lydia Johnson for their 1987 Student/Class
Mr.
Roanok
project Award, and VAPA has chosen her for the state awaMr. Herb
to Miss Johnson's father,
Strickland presented the award ^ition.
Johnson, who thanked the County for this recog
IN RE: NEW BUSINESS
pa Ste for
1 A royal of Additional
orted that staff
Classification and Pa Plan: D. Keith Cook rep
be added to the Classification
is recommending an eighth step
of County positions any
to maintain the competitive status o
Plan to ees who were at the top
provide an increase for those emp Y
lary scale. The cost would be $49,181, and staf
their sa
May 12, 1987
,commends that funds for this be allocated from the 1987/88
yard Contingency Fund.
Supervisor Johnson moved to approve an additional pay
;ep in the Classification and Pay Play. The motion was seconded
y Supervisor Brittle.
Supervisor Nickens was concerned that the Board was
pproving an additional pay step when this plan was established
o reflect the proper salary scale for each job. He was also
;oncerned that the County has told the public that this was a
sight budget year, and now the County is coming up with
additional funds for a pay increase. Supervisor Brittle pointed
out this was coming from the Board Contingency Fund, and was a
very good use of the funds. Mr. Cook advised the Board that a
task force has been established to look at the entire salary
structure and that this was a one-time additional step.
Supervisor Nickens offered a substitute motion that the
.Human Resources Department develop a plan for those employees at
the top of their salary by which they could be compensated by an
amount not to exceed 2-1/2 percent, and that the procedure
include a process that this 2-1/2 percent not be added on to
future year's salary schedule. The motion died for lack of a
second.
Mr. Cook described what the task force will be doing
over the next year. Supervisor Johnson asked Mr. Cook to stud
the JLARK recommendation that the Roanoke County Sheriff':
Department does not meet the requirements for extra hazardous paY
He also requested that those employees who are not required t
have a degree, but on their own return to college for the degree
be recognized in the pay scale.
The original motion was carried by the followir
re
Bc
s
Ib
a
recorded vote:
Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Johnson
AYES:
NAYS: Supervisor Nickens
May 12, 1987
_._--
_ _ --
--
II
ABSENT: None ~
2, p, royal of an Investment Polic for Roanoke
Treasurer Alfred Anderson was present to answer
~ou_ nty: County
any questions on the prepared report. This policy establishes
guidelines for the efficient management of County funds and
applies to investments of the financial assets of the County.
Supervisor Johnson moved to approve the Investment
policy. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Garrett and
carried by the following recorded vote:
Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson
AYES:
NAYS: None
.BSENT: None
3, Re uest from the School Board for Su lemental
~iterar Loans for Glenvar Elementar School and Mason's Cove
Elementary Schools County Administrator Elmer Hodge announced
es Wilson and Homer Duff from the County Schools were
that Bay
unable to attend to present the report. These supplemental loans
are for the Mason's Cove cafeteria addition and a classroom and
cafeteria addition for Glenvar Elementary School. ~
Supervisor Johnson advised that these loans are on the
debt retirement schedule.
Supervisor Garrett moved to authorize the School Board
to proceed with these applications. The motion was seconded by
Supervisor Nickens and carried by the following recorded vote:
Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson
YES:
NAYS: None
BSENT: None
RE: REQUEST FOR WORK SESSIONS
Chairman Johnson requested a work session on the Pa
nd Classification Plan when the task force has completed it
ork and requested that the work session include the issues Y
~I
s
ei
May 12, 1987
---- - -
II
If
had requested earlier in the meeting regarding the JLARK study
and salary increases for those who pursue a college degree.
IN RE: REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS
Supervisor Brittle stated he had received phone calls
on the Cat Rabies Ordinance, and wondered if the seconMd.rMahoney
could be postponed until the second meeting in May.
explained the process of first and second readings of ordinances.
IN RE: FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES
1, Ordinance amendin Cha ter 13 "Offenses-
Miscellaneous: Section 13 and 14 of the Roanoke Count Code
concernin Unlawful Dis osal of Waste Materials and Unlawful
Accumulations of Trash and Weeds: Paul Mahoney, County
Attorney, reported that as a result of a Court case, it has
become necessary to tighten up parts of the ordinance. A draft
of the ordinance was brought to the Board at the last meeting.
Supervisor Brittle moved to approve the first reading
of the ordinance. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Garrett
and carried by the following recorded vote:
Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson
AYES:
NAYS: None
ABSENT: None
2. Ordinance authorizin Ac uisition of Easements
Mr. Mahoney reported this
for Castle Rock Sewer Line: roximately
ordinance would authorize the staff to acquire app
eight easements for a sewer line project. This project will be
funded from the 1974 sewer bond proceeds.
Supervisor Brittle moved to approve the first reading
of the ordinance. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Nicken
and carried by the following recorded vote:
May 12, 1987
,AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson
AYS: None
ABSENT: None
3. Ordinance authorizin Ac uisition of Easement for
he Brambleton Avenue Highway Project: Mr. Mahoney advised
this ordinance would authorize the staff to acquire easements for
the Brambleton Avenue Highway Project.
Supervisor Garrett moved to approve the first reading
of the ordinance. The motion was seconded by Supervisor
Brittle. Supervisor Brittle wondered if there was anything that
could be done to ease the burden of the establishments on
(Brambleton Avenue because of the adverse affect on business while
the highway project is going on.
The motion was carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson
NAYS: None
ABSENT: None
N RE: SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES
1, Ordinance amendin Article 2 of Cha ter 5
"Animal and Fowl" of the Roanoke Count Code re uirin the
Vaccination of Cats to Prevent Rabies: Mr. Mahoney reported
this is the second reading of the draft ordinance. The effective
date of the ordinance is June 1, 1987. The first reading was or
April 28, 1987. The matter has been discussed at length ai
previous board meetings.
Supervisor McGraw moved to approve the second reading
lof the ordinance. The motion was seconded by Superviso
dBrittle.
ORDINANCE 51ANIMALSEANDNFOWL°COF 2T HE
CHAPTER 5, "
VACCZNATIONOOF CATSODO PREV4NTI RABIES HE
May 12, 1987
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
unty, Virginia, as follows:
1, That Section 5-66, 5-67, 5-68, 5-69 and 5-70 of
ticle 2 of Chapter 5 "Animals and Fowl" are hereby amended to
gad and provide as follows:
>.ction 5-66. Vaccination required. keep,
(a) It shall be unlawful for any person to own,
or cat over the age of six (6) months
old, or harbor any dog
unless the dog or cat has been vaccinated with
ithin the county,
36) months.
(b) p,ny person transporting a dog or cat six (6>
from some other jurisdic-
tonths of age or older into the county
:ion shall be required to comply with this section within thirty
(30) days after bringing the dog or cat into the county.
Section 5-67. Vaccination certificate.
At the time of vaccination of a dog or cat pursuant to
Section 5-66, a certificate shall be issued to the owner of the
dog or cat, which certificate shall be properly executed and sign-
a licensed veterinarian, and shall certify that the dog or
ed by
cat has been vaccinated as required by Section 5-66. The certifi-
cate shall show the date of vaccination, a brief description of
the dog or cat, and its sex and breed, and the name of the owner
of the dog or cat. A copy of such certificate shall be sent at
once to the county and kept on file where duplicate copies may be
obtained by the dog's or cat's owner, upon payment of such fee as
is prescribed by the board of supervisors.
Section 5-68. Impoundment of unvaccinated dogs or ca Which is no
(a) Any dog or cat found in the county
vaccinated as required in this division shall be impounded by th
animal control officer or other officer and held at the anima
shelter for a period of seven (7) days. The dog or cat may t
returned to its owner, upon proof of ownership, vaccination c
or cat, and payment of the cost of impounding the dog o~
the dog
Co
AY
rf
S~
h
F
l li
e ii
f
May 12, 1987
at. Such payment shall not relieve the owner from prosecution
or violating Section 5-66.
(b> At the expiration of the seven-day (7) period, any
og or cat impounded under this section and not claimed by its
~wner may be disposed of in accordance with the provisions of
~ection 29-213.66 of the Code of Virginia.
Section 5-69. Vaccination clinics.
The board of supervisors may provide for clinics for
he vaccination of dogs and cats under the supervision of the
nimal control officer and the health director and fix fees to be
harged for services rendered at such clinics.
ection 5-70. Quarantine in event of rabies epidemic.
When, in the judgment of the health director, an emer-
ency shall be deemed to exist in the county or any section there-
f due to a widespread rabies epidemic, the health director may,
for the protection of the public health, declare a quarantine in
the county or such section thereof as may be affected and re-
trict all dogs and ca _ts to the owners' premises or to the immed-
,,iate custody of a responsible person for the duration of such
li
~'pmergency as it is set forth.
II 2. The effective date of this ordinance shall be June
1987.
On motion of Supervisor McGraw, seconded by Supervisor
rittle and carried by the following recorded vote:
YES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson
IAYS: None
ABSENT: None
2. Ordinance acce tin Deed of easement from Urban
~evelo ment and Investments Ltd.: Mr. Mahoney stated that
this development is across from Winterberry Pointe and expander
easements are required due to topographical reasons. They are
(conveying an additional 20 foot water easement and two five foo
May 12, 1987
iitary sewer easements. The first reading of the ordinance was
ril 28, 1987•
Supervisor Garrett moved to approve the second reading
the ordinance. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Brittle
sa
Ap
of
EASEMENT FROM BURBAN CDEVELOPMENTDAND
INVESTMENT, LTD.
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
aunty, Virginia, as follows:
1, That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of
he Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading on the acquisition
~f the hereinafter described real estate was held on April 28,
_987, A second reading on this matter was held on May 12, 1987.
Phis real estate is located between Virginia Route 419 and
ycVitty Road; and
2. That the conveyance of a 20' water easement and two
5' sanitary sewer easements from Urban Development and Invest-
ment, Ltd. to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County is here-
by authorized and approved; and
3, That the County Administrator is authorized to exe-
cute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke
County as are necessary to accomplish the conveyance of this pro-
perty, all of which shall be upon form approved by the County
Attorney.
On motion of Supervisor Garrett, seconded by Supervisor
Brittle and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson
NAYS: None
IIC
BSENT: None
IN RE: REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS
Su ervisor McGraw requested approval from the Board
of Supervisors to direct staff to do whatever is necessary to
May 12, 1987
----- --
---- __
II
rain the pond at Andrew Lewis Place because it has become a
ajor health hazard.
Supervisor McGraw also asked if anything could be done
.bout the mosquitoes that surround the drainage ponds and sink
poles. County Administrator Elmer Hodge directed Chief Animal
lontrol Officer Kenneth Hogan and Dr. Margaret Hagen, Health
irector, to investigate safe but effective ways to control
osquitoes in the County, and bring a report back to the Board.
Super r Garrett asked County Administrator Elmer
odge if anything has been done yet to solve the drainage
roblems at Kentland Road and South Park Circle. Mr. Hodge
esponded that the culvert has been cleaned out and the task
`orce is studying short and long term solutions for these
roblems.
Supervisor Garrett also asked County Attorney Paul
ahoney what progress he has made on the study of using
andicapped citizens to issue citations to those parking in
andicapped spaces. Mr. Mahoney responded that a report should
e available within a few days.
Supervisor Johnson presented a computer printout
ith all the financial obligations of the County for the next
wenty years. He asked the staff for a permanent backing for the
printout to be hung in the Board office.
RE: CONSENT AGENDA
Supervisor Nickens moved to approve the Consent
genda. Supervisor Johnson seconded the motion.
RESOLUTION NO. 51287_6 APPROVING AND
CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH
FOR THISBDATE DESIGNATEDIASRITEMELDA
CONSENT AGENDA
May 12, 1987
gE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke)
unty, Virginia, as follows:
1, That that certain section of the agenda of the
>ard of Supervisors for May 12, 1987, designated as Item L -
~nsent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to
Bch item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1
hrough 2, inclusive, as follows:
Cc
B~
G
e
It
1, Minutes of Meetings - March 30, 1987, April 7,
1987.
2. Confirmation of Committee Appointments to the Human
Services Committee and the Recreation Commission.
2, That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized
and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said
items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to
this resolution. Su ervisor
On motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by P
Johnson and carried by the following recorded vote:
Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson
AYES:
(NAYS: None
ABSENT: None
II IN RE: CITIZENS COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS
None
IN RE: REPORTS
The following reports were received and filed:
1, Economic Development Update
2. Board Contingency Fund
3, Accounts Paid for April 1987
q, Unappropriated Fund Balance
5, Youth Haven II Status Report
May 12, 1987
---- - - -
--- ---
- __
--- - --- ------------ - - - II
Supervisor Brittle congratulated Bev Waldo, Youth Haven
I Program Manager and Elmer Hodge for working out a trade-off
greement with Roanoke City for placement slots at YOUTH HAVEN II.
Supervisor Nickens questioned the accuracy of the
fnappropriated Fund Balance. County Administrator Elmer Hodge
-esponded that this would be checked and corrected if necessary.
:N RE: EXECUTIVE SESSION
At 3:10 p.m., Supervisor Brittle moved to go into
Executive Session pursuant to the Code of Virginia, Section
2.1-344 (a) (1) to discuss a personnel matter. The motion was
seconded by Supervisor Nickens and carried by a unanimous voice
,vote.
IN RE: OPEN SESSION
Supervisor Johnson moved to return to Open Session at
4:00 p.m. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Brittle and
carried by a unanimous voice vote.
RE: ADJOURNMENT
At 4:01 p.m. Chairman Johnson declared the meeting
djourned.
Bob L. Johnson, Chairman
A-6987-12.a
ITEM NUMBER
T A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOAKE COUNTYEAD MINISTRATIONN CENTER
A
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROAN
MEETING DATE: June 9, 1987
e in Sanitary Sewer Easement
SUB_ J__; Chang
Branderwood Section #3
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
Boone, & Loeb, Inc.,
The developer of Branderwood, Boone, sewer easement
has presented a plan to revise the sanitary
on Lot 17 Block 2, Section #3 of the Brae dt on°of
located atio area of
Subdivision. This revisedteaselocatedcwithin the1P P n of Lot
the existing easement tha the remaining porn o
the house on Lot 17. Additionally,
which is west of the sewer line is added to the existing
17
easement.
vacation of a portion of the inswhech to mainta ntthe
The
rovide additional area atio to be
of easement will p
sewer line and at the entmareame will permit t e p
located outside the eas
FISCAL IMPACT:
There are no County funds required for this change.
RECOMMENDATION:
taff recommends that the Boa in thehhatchedaareaoofothe
S
portion of this easement as indicate
hed lan and accept the additional easement as indicated on
attac P
the same plan.
taff also recommends controls be put into place by the
S artment to insure that permits
Construction Building Services Dep
are not issued for construction within easements.
~, / ~
f v - ~-~
SUBMITTED BY:
APPROVED:
Cliff rd Craig
Director of Util' ies
~~
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
--------------------------------
ACTION VOTE
SAM/LG to a rove No Yes Abstain
Approved Q() Motion by: Brittle X
Denied ( ) staff recommen ation Garrett X
Received ( ) Johnson X
Referred McGraw X
To Nickens X
cc: File
Clifford Craig
Phillip Henry
John Hubbard
ITEM NUMBER
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BNOKE OCOUNTYEADMINISTRATIONNCENTER
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROA
MEETING DATE: June 9, 1987
UBJECT: Addition of Martha Drive (Route 1916) and Gates Circle
S ---- 1917 into the Virginia Lapartment of
(Route stem
Transportation Secondary Sy
BOUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: ted a resolution
g, 1986, the Board of Supervisors adop
On July
e uesting that the Department of Tands0 09 miles of Route 01917
r q
miles of Route 1916 (Martha Dris stem.
(Gates Circle) into the Secondary Y
ar K. Mabry, Deputy Commissioner of the Department of
Osc
Transportation has now inf ~med us that this addition is
approved, effective May 21, 198
APPROVED BY:
SUBMITTED BY:
~.~ ~ ~ ~'~
~~ Elmer C. Hodge
Mary H. Allen County Administrator
Deputy Clerk
------------------
----------
---- VOTE
--------------------- ACTION No Yes A]
ed ( ) Motion by: Brittle -
Approv
Denied ( ) Garrett
Received ( ) Johnson
Referred McGraw
To ~._ Nickens
in r•.~<
g
4
> ,
DEPARTMDENA~ BROADSTREORTATION
RICHMOND, 23219
RAY D.PETHTEL
COMMISSIONER
May 21, 1987
/~- '/
OSCAR K. MABRY
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
Secondary System
Additions
Roanoke County
Board of Supervisors
County of Roanoke
p, O. Box 3800
Roanoke, VA 24015
Members of the Board:
our resolution dated July 8, 1986, the follow-
As requested in y stem of Roanoke County are hereby
ing additions to the Se21nd1987Sy
approved, effective May
LENGTH
ADDITIONS
NORTHGATE SUBDIVISION
Route 1916 (Martha Drive) - From Route 1832
to a south cul-de-sac
Route 1917 (Gates Circle) - From Route 1916
to a southeast cul-de-sac
Sincerely,
~~'~``''rr'f~
Oscar K. Mabry
Deputy Commissioner
TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21ST CENTURY
0.12 Mi.
0.09 Mi.
A-6987-12b
ITEM NUMBER
R MEETING OF THE BOARD OFUNTYEADMINISTRATIONNOCENTER
AT A REGULA
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANORE C
June 9, 1987
MEETING DATE: artment
Request for Fireworks Permit from Hills Dep
SUBSUB--'JE- Store
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: ermit for a fireworks
artment Store has requested a P
Hills Dep d on July 4, 1987 . Firewnrdk theyl w 1 d agreerto
display to be hel
Carolina will conduct the display. a
following safety precautions: Hills
S. Foster's recommendation. one
Pursuant to Sheriff O.
to ten off-duty officers, starting
is required to emp Y in and to extend one hour
eg
Six of these
hour before the fireworks
beyond the time that the fireworks en .
ned to handle additius d tonfthe
officers would be assig and four would be
on Route 419 and Route 221.
parking lot at Hills Department Store.
Store has received approval from the Board for
Hills Department ears.
this fireworks display for several y
APPROVED BY:
SUBMITTED BY:
yj ~ ~ e
~~G~-~d'` I`o'' Elmer C. Hodg
Mary H. Allen County Administrator --
Deputy Clerk ---------------------------
__ ------------------ VOTE
----------- -----------ACTIO e with No Yes
BLJ/NLG to approv X
X Motion by: Brittle --~
Approved ~ ~ safety precautions Garrett --~-
Denied ~ ~ Johnson ~-
Received ( ~ McGraw -~-
Referred Nickens
To ~-
cc: File
Fireworks File
Sheriff Foster
Tommy Fuqua
/ `t ~' ~T
FIREWORKS DISPLAY PERMIT APPLICATION
Pursuant to the provisions of Section 11-2 of the
a lies
anoke County Code the following organization hereby PP
Ro for a display
to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County
of fireworks within Roanoke County.
~~~ ~
1, Name of organization -
-~ ~-~ r--:~,,,/; ,tax
2, Address of organization -
~.~ / ,;:.
3, Date of fireworks display - ~
q, Location of fireworks display -
ualified expert who will conduct such
5, Name and address of q ualification as an expert -
display and basis for his q
ry
rv~ L" ; fr
r a ~ , , ,~/ ~ ____~r~
~. - ,
The undersigned hereby certifies that the provisions
11-2 of the Roanoke County Code have been read and
of Section fireworks that
will be complied with by said organization. Any
fired after the display shall be immediately disposed
remain un
of in a safe manner.
ts~ G. ~ i.
Name and Title
PROD' '~=R
`_ I
W E J Insurance
212 S. Market
Wichita, KS 67202
316-2E5-6241
INSURED FIREWORKS , Inc .
AUSTIN
4440 5outKSa67210Vd-
Wichita,
_ ~,
~~± ~ I~~~'~~IT~~ lati #;~fa ~+ z .'~~ ~`'~` I l4i ISSUE DATE (MMIDD/YY
~"'~ _ .~ ~ ~ _ r E ~ 05-29_87
TFIIS CERTIFICAT TIRE CERTIDFAS A MATTER 1 EFDI BYORHE ? ON ONLY AND CONFERS
KATE HOLDER. TNIS CERTIFOLIC ES BELOW. AMEND,
NO RIGHTS UPON
EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORD `, ~/
COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE A~~k, ` "t"
A ,ILLINOIS INSURANCE EXCE3ANGE~f?
COMPANY - - ~' l
LETTER _ _._._ -.---__
COMPANY B AE
LETTER
COMPANY C TRAVERLES INDEMNITY
LETTER
COMPANY p
LETTER
COMPANY E 3a
LETZ E R
E LISTED BELOW HAVE dtENACSUEDTO THE INSURED NACMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIODINDICATED.
~ TOR OTFIER DOCUMENT WITHO AL PECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY
A L THE tERMS, EXCLUSIONS, AND CONDI-
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT POLICIES OF INSURANC LIABILITY LIMITS IN THOUSANDS
THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY TFIE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJE
NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONT
BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, ppLICY EFFECTIVE POIICV EXPIFlATION EACH AGGREGATE
TIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. DATE (MMIDD/YY) DATE (MM/DD/YY) OCCURRENCE
POLICY NUMBER
TYPE OF INSURANCE BUDILV
~ INJURY
GENERAL LIABILITY pROPERTY
COMPREHENSIVE FORM DAMAGE ~ $ I
PREMISESIOPERATIONS 5-].6-86 5_16-$$
UNDERGROUND D~L_O4-g 3 5 BI d PD $
EXPLOSION b COLLAPSE HAZARD COMBINED 1 ~ 000 1, 000
PRODUCTSICOMPLETED OPERATIONS
A CONTRACTUAL
INDEPENDENT CONTRACTORS PERSONAL INJURY
BROAD FORM PROPERTY DAMAGE ----"
PERSONAL INJURY B(XIItY
INJURY
(PER PERSON)
eV
AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY gODIIY , , '
INJURY
ANY AUTO (PERIICpDENT) $ ' ''`'
ALL OWNED AUTOS (PRIN. PASS.)
X ALL OWNED AUTOS ~ pRIV RPASS ~ 2 - 2 5- $ 7 2 2 5 8 8 DAMAGETM $
L. X HIRED AUTOS 6SBAP56OG$62
BI d PD
X NON-OWNED AUTOS COMBINED $ 5, 000
GARAGE LIABILITY
BI d PD
COMBINED
EXCESS LIABILITY
UMBRELLA FORM STATUTORY
(EACH ACCIDENT)
OTHER THAN UMBRELLA FORM DISEASE-POLICY LIMIT)
7-15-86 7-15-87 $500(
WORKERS' COMPENSATION 4C431786 $ 100 (DISEASE-EACHEMPLOYI
AND 9
B -
EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY
OTHER '~
• see back of Certificate
OF OPERATIONS/LOCATIONSNEHICLESISPECIAL ITE L'ADDIo~eONAL INSUREDS • ~ ext Clear Might
Roanoke, VA
DESCRIPTION Lot ~ gills Dep RAIN DATE : I~t
LOCATION: Parking
DISPLAY ?SATE: 7-4-87 ~ `
. •
~ ~ ~ SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE
5~~ DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING COMPANY WILL ENDEAVOR 1
H111 1~ MAIL DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO TI
g De t . ~tC~re ~f ®~ ,~' PIRATI~~
BUT FAILURE TO MAIL SUCH NOTICE SHALL IMPOSE NO OBLIGATION OR LIABI
ambleton AVe . LEFT, ENTS O REPRESENTATIVES.
3901 Er -~'FT;NY~-KIND UPON T COMP
,~ f~.
VA 24018 ~ E
oanoke, 7,(THORIZED REPRE ~-~~, j %~~ ~j •
~. `.- .. -
. V ~ ~ DEPARTMENT STORES ~ _ L
`er~ ~T
J
TO~ Distribution
FROM=~ Janet Odegard, Manager
Advertising promotions
-DATE= June 2, 1987 .
SUBJECT = FIREWO~ INSURANCE
Attached is your Certificate of Insurance from Austintown
Fireworks who is insuring Fireworks Unlimited, the company
Chat will be responsible for your store's fireworks display.
1 for your fireworks permit now that
Please. immediately app y The fireworks will be on Saturday,
you have your insurance.
July 4 at 10.15 pm, except for X124 whose fireworks will be
on Friday, .July 3 at IONS pm.
Thank you for your cooperation.
Distribution: 17-20-22-24-25-32-53-54-72-124
ITEM NUMBER- '"=
R MEETING OF THE BOARD OF NTYEADMINISTRATION CENTER
AT A REGULA
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANORE CO
MEETING DATE: June 9, 1987
royal of Resolution of Support for the Blue Ridge
SUB_.J_ ECT_ paPkways's "DEDICATION 87" Celebration
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
After 52 years of ~ 11 beucomplet d
$124 million in costs, the
on September 11, 1987.
Blue Ridge Parkway wi 1 o n g
a summer-
n i t i o n o f t h i s a c h i e Vlannedtby the Commonwealth
I n r e c o g „DEDICATION g7" is being p
celebration, North Carolina and the Blue R1 ge
of Virginia, the State °fhlight of the celebration will be on
The hig the
Parkway Association.
11, 1987, with the the neatcGra dfathermMountain-
September constructio
final segment of Parkway reQuested a
"DEDICATION 87" Committee has
The Blue Ridge Parkway similar
Su ort for this effortsemblyteriactedoae Coun y
Resolution °ervisors. The General As
Board of Sup 1987.
resolution in February
RECOMMENDATION roved by the
t is recommended that the attached resolution be ap
hat a certified copy be sent to the
I and t
Board of Supervisors,
Blue Ridge Parkway "DEDICATION 87" Committee.
~-~~
SUBMITTED BY:
Mary H. Allen
1 rk
APPROVED BY:
~~~
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
Deputy C e ____
-----------
_____ -------- ----------------- VOTE
-- ACTION No Yes Abs
p,pproved ( ) Motion by: Brittle
Denied ( ~ Garrett
Received ( ) Johnson
Referred McGraw
To -_ Nickens
L ASSEMBLY OF VIRGINIA - 1987 SESSION ~ ~
GENERA
HOUSE JOINT RESOLUTION NO. 365
rtation and the Division of Tourism to cooperate
Requesting the Department of ?'ranspo
the State of North Carolina. the National Park Service. and the Governor's to y
o the Blue Ridge Parkway in the preparation
with
Commission on the 1987 Grand DeeBlue Ridge Parkway.
of an appropriate dedication of g, 1987
Agreed to by the HouseSenate ~ bruary b 9,a 987
Agreed to by
e Blue Ridge Parkway began as a titute tr~ide ~ioi the mountainskl of
WHEREAS, th
designed to provide much needed employment for des County,
Virginia and North Carolina; and ro ect ~~ at Cumberland Knob in Allegheny
WHEREAS, construction on ~~ 9 5;1 and has not only
North Carolina. on Sep`heb~tervening fifty-two years. the Blue Rrenownedwexyample of how
WHEREAS. duringu ose. but has become an internationally be carefully planned and
fulfilled its original p rP
harmony between man and the natural environment ~~ attributes of this
implemented; and natural. cultural. and recreational
WHEREAS, the outstanding
of the Natloaal Park System have attracted more than 21 million vis e
470-mile-long unit .. ~ not y
per year and ularity generated even though the Blue Ridge Parkway
WHEREAS. this poP
complete; and ilnal section oY Parkway under co last No~~Caroilna,nwil~ b hclomplePt~e
WHEREAS, the
around the rugged and historic Grand 1987 randountain
Virginia and .the State of North Carolina, n
apd open to visito a Commonwealthl~ of ~ nned and will implement "Dedication
. WHEREAS. th
cooperation with the National Park Service, have Pla of the final section; and
`87," a summer-long series of events leading to the opening reciation, awareness, and
•` edication '87" promises to attracilheadappl and even international
WHEREAS, D contributing to
thereby ~ well as the two states; and
attention and attendance,
understanding of the Blue Ridge Parkway
dedication program has been sche nsltruction Sof tthebBluel Ridge Parkway;
WHERr-AS; a nln of co
the Fifty-second Anniversary of the begin ~ S .
therefore, be it ~ Thy--the Department of
now, the H~ of Delegates. ~ the Senate concurring, ~~A`u~te ~~
RESOLVED by
Park Service. and the Governor's Study
Transportation and the Drulina °tfhe oNational _$~ ~~ hee Pa ~ ay in the preparation of
the State of North Ca of the Blue Ridg
Commission on the 1987 Grand Opening re are a copy of
appropriate dedica gTHER, That~the Clerklof thlegHou h °~a eleof tttiep Governor's Study
'RESOLVED '~ resentatlon to Jack C. Smith.
this resolution for P ening of the Blue Ridge Parkway.
Commission on the 1987 Grand Op
. ~-'
OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
TgE BOARD
A AT THE ROANOKE CO U8TY ADMINISTRATI
REGULAR MEETING OF 7
AT VIRGINIA, HELD JUNE 9, 19
COUNTY, CENTER ON TUESDAY,
LUTION OF SUPPORT FOR THE BLUE RIDGE
RESO " PROJECT
"DEDICATION g7
PARKWAY of Roanoke
IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors
BE
County, Virginia, as follows: began as a Great
WHEREAS, the Blue Ridge parkway
designed to provide much needed
undertaking of Virginia
Depression era
for destitute residents of the mountains
employment
and began at
and North Carolina; on this project
WHEREAS , construction on September
Knob in Alleghany County, North Carolina-
Cumberland
two years, the
11, 1935; and fifty-
WHEREAS, during the intervening but
final purpose
fulfilled it orig
e Parkway has not only how harmony
Blue Ridg renowned example of
internationally carefully planned
has become an
man and the natural environment can be
between
lemented; and cultural, and
and imp natural,
WHEREAS, the outstanding of the
long unit
tional attributes of this 470-mile-
more than 21 million visits
recrea
National Park System have attracted.
per year; and o f parkway under
WHEREAS, the final section
e-half miles around the rugged and
seven and on will be complete
construction,
Grandfather Mountain in North Carolina,
historic 1987; and
and open to visitors on September 11,
wealth of Virginia and the State of
WHEREAS, the CommOri park Service
'na, in cooperation with the National
North Carole
I 1
a summer-long
"DEDICATION 87"-
and
have planned and will implement
to the opening of the final section;
or
series of events leading
edication program has been scheduled
WHEREAS, a d second Anniversary of the
is the Fifty-
September 11, 1987 which
e Parkway.
of the Blue Ridg
of construction t h a t t h e B oar d o f
beginning
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED
ounty supports the Commonwealth of
Roanoke C
Supervisors of the National Park
Carolina and
the State of North occasion
Virginia, this important
Service in their efforts to celebrate
with appropriate ceremonies; and
RESOLVED that the Deputy Clerk be
BE IT FURTHER resolution for
copy of this
certified 87„ Committee.
to prepare a
directed "DEDICATION
presentation to the Blue Ridge Parkway
o~ ~'O~i Mira
p
~~
Z
o z
a
18 E50 $8
SFSQUICENTENN~P~
A Beautiful8eginning
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
ELMER C. HODGE
CnDltri~~ v~ ~p~tnpkF
June 11, 1987
Mr. Jack C. Smith- DEDICATION 87
Blue Ridge Parkway
14 W. Kirk Avenue
Roanoke, Virginia 24011
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
BOB JOHNSON. CHAIRMAN
HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
LEE GARRETT. VICE-CHAIRMAN
WINDSOR HILLS MAAGLISAN H. BRITTLE
CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
STEVEN A. MCGRAW
CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
HARRY C. NICKENS
VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
Dear Mr. Smith:
Attached is a copy of Resolution No. 6987-12.n concerning
su ort for the Blue Ridge Parkway Dedication 87 Project. This
pp the Board of Supervisors at their
resolution was adop1987bY
meeting on June 9,
If you need further information, please do not hesitate to
contact me.
Sincerely,
~~~~ ~,
wry H. Allen
Deputy Clerk
Attachment
P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24018-0798 (703) 772-2004
Blue Ridge Parkway
DEDICATION ' 8 a zaoll • (703> 34a-5188 or
14 W. Kirk Avenue • Roanoke,
700 Northwestern Plaza • Asheville, N.C. 288U1 • (~~) 259-0351
Committee
Gary Everhardt
Superintendent Blue Ridge
Parkway and Chairman
Sen. Harry R Byrd Jr.
Winchester, YA
Honorary VA Chairman
Mrs. Richard G. Dick
Winchester, YA
Mrs. Lindsay G. Dorrier Jr.
Scottsville, YA
H.T.N. Graves
Luray, yA
Mrs. Mary R. Guynn
Galax, YA
C. W. Hardin
Canton, N. C.
Jack M. Hennessee
Sylva, N. C.
Mrs. Robert C. Kinser
Asheville, N.C.
N. C. Chairman
Hugh Morton
Linville, N. C.
E. Spencer Robbins
Blowing Rock, N. C.
Jack C. Smith
Roanoke, VA
YA Chairman
May 11 , 1987
Dr. Harry C. Nickens
Chairman
Roanoke County
p.0. Box 510
Salem, VA 24153
Dear Mr. Nickens: will reach an
On September 11, 1987 the Blue Ridge Parkway
historic milestone. After 52 years of construction and some
124-million in costs, the scenic motor road will be completed.
~ nation of this achievement, a summer-long celebration
In reeog is being p the Commonwealth
entitled "Dedication '87" Tanned by the nation and
of Virginia, the State of North Coa 1 isnto ffi~e he Blue Ridge
Parkway Association. Their common g
the world more aware and apprecices to be found ontthe Pa kway
recreational and cultural resour asses.
and in the 29 counties through which it p
The highlight of the celebratti n of theefinalos gmentlof
to ca mile
at Grandfather Mountain, this panoramic, 7.5-
Parkway construction. On September 11, ublic.
section officially will be opened to the p
observe this occasion, we solicit your
s a
To help us adequately
ort for "Dedication t87" in the form of a resolution.
supp we are enclosing a copy of
example you might wish to eO enacted by the General Assembly
House Joint Resolution No. 365
1987
of Virginia in February, and its
Thank you for your interest in the B1 ~~e o ~ ~inalwor a copy
activities. We will appreciate receiving
of any action you might take onto he nta ttus. If we can be of
assistance, please don't hesitate
Sincerely,
"~~~ S o Ya, c~ ~ ~ ~ ~`"~'--fit a.~P
Deborah Morgenthal
Special Assistant to the Secretary
.~~ ~ - a ~'
~.
.,
ING OF THE BOARD OF SCpUNTYSADMINISTRATOION
AT A REGULAR MEET HELD AT THE ROANOKE 1987
COUNTY, VIRGINIA. JUNE 9-
CENTER ON TUESDAY,
RESOLUTION 6987-12.n OF SUPPORT FOR THE
BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY "DEDICATION 87
PROJECT
LVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
BE IT RESO
Virginia, as follows: Grea t
County, began as a
WHEREAS, the Blue Ridge Parkway
taking designed to provide much needed
Depression era under the mountains of Virginia
employment for destitute residents of
and an at
and North Carolina; th i s project beg
on
WHEREAS, construction tember
nob in Alleghany County, North Carolina, on Sep
Cumberland K
11, 1935; and two years, the
Prvening fifty-
WHEREAS, during the int_
not only fulfilled it original purpose but
Blue Ridge Parkway has renowned example of how harmony
has become an internationally Tanned
and the natural environment can be carefully P
between man
lemented; and a n d
and imP natural, cultural,
WHEREAS, the outstanding the
tributes of this 470-mile-long unit of
recreational at
tem have attracted more than 21 million visits
National Park Sys
per year ; and u n d e r
WHEREAS, the final section of Parkway
ed and
ion, seven and one-half miles around the ruggom lete
construct
randfather Mountain in North Carolina, will be
historic G 1987; and
and open to visitors on September 11,
WHEREAS, the Commonwealth of Virginia and the State of
North Carolina, in cooperation with the National Park Service
have planned and will implement "DEDICATION 87", a summer-long
series of events leading to the opening of the final section; and
WHEREAS, a dedication program has been scheduled for
September 11, 1987 which is the Fifty-second Anniversary of the
beginning of construction of the Blue Ridge Parkway.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of
Supervisors of Roanoke County supports the Commonwealth of
Virginia, the State of North Carolina and the National Park
Service in their efforts to celebrate this important occasion
with appropriate ceremonies; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Deputy Clerk be
directed to prepare a certified copy of this resolution for
presentation to the Blue Ridge Parkway "DEDICATION 87" Committee.
On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor
Garrett and upon the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson
NAYS: None
A COPY - TESTE
Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
6/10/87
CC: File
DEDICATION 87 Committee
~ ITEM NUMBER ~ ~ ~--'
ATYA VIRGINIA HELDNATOTHEHROANORE
COUNT ,
OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE
COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: June 9, 1987
UBJECT: Acceptance of Beavers LaionaSecondaryeSysDemve into the
S ortat
Vir~ a Department of Transp
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The residents of Fox Fire Subdivision requests that the
rove a resolution to the Virginia
Board of Supervisors app that they accept 0.15
Department of rsrLane anda0113 m le seof1Elizabeth Drive.
miles of Beave w i t h
The staff has inspected these roads along
inia Department of Transportation and
representatives of the Virg
find these roads are acceptable.
FISCAL IMPACT: ~ ram. The
art of the Roanoke County Bond Prog
This is p
estimated cost will be $25,000.00
RECOMMENDATION:
The staff recommends that the Board approve a resolution to
uesting that they accept Beavers Lane and Elizabeth
the VDOT req stem.
Drive into the Secondary Road Sy
p,PPROVED
SUBMITTED BY:
~ - ~'~ ~
III, P.E. Elmer C. Hodge
h A. Peters, County Administrator
sistant Director of
gineering
-------------- ------------------- VOTE Abs
-------------- ACTION No Yes
p,pproved ( ) Motion by: Brittle
Denied ( ) Garrett
Received ( ) Johnson
Referred McGraw
to Nickens
2
.~-~-
--~-__ -
_3
~ • •~o.
p61 D
\-m_
VICINITY MAP
~~•,~'-- Cr ~..
~'
NORTH
i~
i,
7~ i
. •/
~ ',' .
~;
,;
i
- /;
~:'
~-
,.
/'
i
r.
i..
~,
,.
l`
~~
~.
o
1. ~~~
~°'
Ses Mop 71
~" . 400
T of .BEAVERS LA.
DEPARTMEN
PUBLIC FACILITIES
& ELIZABETH D •
..
.. ~ (rte f .~..
AT THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HCENTER ONETUESDAYE JUNET9,p,1987ISTRP,TION
RESOLUTION REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF
BEAVERS LAND AND ELIZABETH DRIVE INTO THE VIRGINIA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That this matter came this day to be heard upon the
proceedings herein, and upon the application of Beavers Lane and
Elizabeth Drive to be accepted and made a part of the Secondary
System of State Highways under Section 33.1-229 of the Virginia
State Code.
2. That it appears to the Board that drainage easements
and a fifty (50) foot right-of-way for said roads have heretofore
deed dedicated by virtue of a certain map known as Fox Fire
Subdivision which map was recorded in Plat Book 9, Page 90, of
the records of the Clerk's Office of he Circuit Court of Roanoke
County, Virginia, on June 30, 1977, and that by reason of the
recordation of said map no report from a Board of Viewers, nor
consent or donation of right-of-way from the abutting property
owners is necessary. The Board hereby guarantees said
right-of-way for drainage.
3, That said roads known as Beaver Lane and Elizabeth
Drive and which are shown on a certain sketch accompanying this
Resolution, be, and the same are hereby established as public
roads to become a part of the State Secondary System of Highways
in Roanoke County, only from and after notification of official
acceptance of said streets or highway by the Virginia Department
of Transportation.
M
T THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOAROANOKEUCOUNTYOADMINISORAOION
A 1987
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT TH
CENTER ON TUESDAY, JUNE 9,
RESOLUTION 6987-lELIZABE~HEDRIVE INTOPTHECVIRGINIA
BEAVERS LANE AND
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY ROAD SYSTE
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
on the
1, That this matter came this day to be heard up Lane and
proceedings herein, and upon the application of Beavers
lizabeth Drive to be accepted and made a part of the Secondary
E
stem of State Highways under Section 33.1-229 of the Virginia
Sy
State Code.
2, That it appears to the Board that drainage easements
d a fifty (50) foot right-of-way for said roads have heretofore
an
deed dedicated by virtue of a certain map known as Fox Fire
was recorded in Plat Book 9, Page 90, of
Subdivision which map
records of the Clerk's Office of he Circuit Court of Roanoke
the
1977, and that by reason of the
County, Virginia, on June 30,
recordation of said map no report from a Board of Viewers, nor
from the abutting property
consent or donation of right-of-way
owners is necessary. The Board hereby guarantees said
right-of-way for drainage.
3, That said roads known as Beaver Lane and Elizabeth
this
Drive and which are shown on a certain sketch accompanying
established as public
Resolution, be, and the same are hereby
stem of Highways
roads to become a part of the State Secondary Sy
Roanoke County, only from and after notification of official
in
. hi hway by the Virginia Department
acceptance of said streets or g
of Transportation. ervisor
motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Sup
On
arrett and upon the following recorded vote:
G McGraw, Nickens, Johnson
Supervisors Brittle, Garrett,
AYES:
NAYS: None
A COPY - TESTE
~~~~ ~ ~! -- Clerk
Mary H Allen, Deputy
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
6/10/87
CC: File Assistant County Administrator
John Hubbard, of Engineering
John Peters, Assistant Director
Arnold Covey, Development Review Coordinator
Va. Department of Transportation
ITEM NUMBER / ~'
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: June 9, 1986
SUBJECT: Acceptance of Wing Commander Drive and Grape Tree Lane
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The residents of Nichols Estates Subdivision requests that
the Board of Supervisors approve a resolution to the Virginia
Department of Transportation requesting that they accept 0.17
miles of Wing Commander Drive and 0.14 miles of Grape Tree Lane.
The staff has inspected these roads along with
representatives of the Virginia Department of Transportation and
find these roads are acceptable.
FISCAL IMPACT: N`"
This is part of the Roanoke County Bond Project. The
estimated cost will be $40,000.00.
RECOMMENDATION:
The staff recommends that the Board approve a resolution to
the VDOT requesting that they accept Wing Commander Drive and
Grape Tree Lane into the Secondary Road System.
SUBMITTED B.Y:
onn H.-reLers, 111, r.~.
ssistant Director of
ngineering
APPROVED:
~~
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
,~
-----------------------------------------------------------------
ACTION VOTE
Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs
Denied ( ) Brittle
Received ( )
Referred
to
Garrett
Johnson
McGraw
Nickens
2
:,
'~'
NORTH
10
j '~
~ 9
/' ~ - 9
~" s
8
7
6
6 ~
i
5
/ 4
3 14
\; 2 .5
u~.?oo
~ .~
=~ -~.
6
~-:. ~
DEPARTMENT OF GRAPE TREE LA. &
PUBLIC FACILITIES
WING COMMANDER DR.
q~ 30\
iJ3j ^c ac
29 0
y90 Lc W
Q
Pi0 86 12-4-8
i'= i00 28
~~ ac
27' 26
13 O ,~ o
:\
\\\ 2.5
~~ ~ O
~ ` ," : 2 3
24 Q o
~\ \
i2 ~~'
.:< ~ _
\ ~~
6
'~ ~ \
''S2
~ 22
z~' ..
,,I \ ' µ /
-.-~
. ' N ~ M1 / ~ -
q ~i0 8508-5-II
O 9. ~~ '~
~_ ~
~~ P°~~
3 ? ~
4 z a~ o: o+~c /
ea ac .c. Pos¢~ _ ~,3
\ ,, / /
~ ~
/" i "". ~....
AT THE REGULAR MEETING OF TTETHEp'ROANOKEUCOUNTYOADMINISTRATION
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD A 1987
CENTER ON TUESDAY, JUNE 9,
RESOLUTION REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF WING
COMMANDER DRIVE AND GRTATIONESECONDARYTROADESYSTEM IA
DEPARTMENT OF TRP,NSPO
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1, That this matter came this day to be heard upon the
proceedings herein, and upon the application for Wing Commander
art of the
Drive and Grape Tree Lane to be accepted and made a p
Secondary System of State Highways under Section 33.1-229 of the
Virginia State Code.
2. That it appears to the Board that drainage easements
and a fifty (50) foot right-of-way for said road have heretofore
deed dedicated by virtue of a certain map known as Nichols Estate
Page 86, of
Subdivision which map was recorded in Plat Book 9,
the records of the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke
County, Virginia, on, May 20, 1977 and that by reason of the
recordation of said map no report from a Board of Viewers, nor
from the abutting property
consent or donation of right-of-way
owners is necessary. The Board hereby guarantees said
right-of-way for drainage.
3. That said roads known as Wing Commander Drive and Grape
Tree Lane and which are shown on a certain sketch accompanying
this Resolution, be, and the same are hereby established as
stem of
public roads to become a part of the State Secondary Sy
Highways in Roanoke County, only from and after notification of
official acceptance of said streets or highway by the Virginia
Department of Transportation.
AT THE REGULAR MEETING OF TTETHEP'ROANOKEUCOUNTYOADMINISTRATION
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD A J~Lr g~ 1987
CENTER ON TUESDAY,
RESOLUTION 6987-12.d REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF WING
COMMANDER DRIVE AND G~ TIONRSECONDARY ROADTS STEM GINIA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTA
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1, That this matter came this day to be heard upon the
lication for Wing Commander
proceedings herein, and upon the app
Drive and Grape Tree Lane to be accepted and made a part of the
Secondary System of State Highways under Section 33.1-229 of the
Virginia State Code.
2, That it appears to the Board that drainage easements
and a fifty (50) foot right-of-way for said road have heretofore
deed dedicated by virtue of a certain map known as Nichols Estate
Subdivision which map was recorded in Plat Book 9, Page 86, of
the records of the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke
County, Virginia, on, May 20, 1977 and that by reason of the
nor
recordation of said map no report from a Board of Viewers,
from the abutting property
consent or donation of right-of-way
owners is necessary. The Board hereby guarantees said
right-of-way for drainage.
3, Tha t said roads known as Wing Commander Drive and Grape
Tree Lane and which are shown on a certain sketch accompanying
this Resolution, be, and the same are hereby established as
art of the State Secondary System of
public roads to become a p
Highways in Roanoke County, only from and after notification of
ITEM NUMBER ~~ ~ ~`
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: June 9, 1987
SUBJECT: Acceptance of Shadow Lane into the Virginia Department
of Transportation Secondary System.
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The residents of Beacon Hills Subdivision requests that the
Board of Supervisors approve a resolution to the Virginia
Department of Transportation requesting that they accept 0.05
miles of Shadow Lane.
The staff has inspected this road along with Representatives
of the Virginia Department of Transportation and find the road is
acceptable.
FISCAL IMPACT: ~~
This is part of the Roanoke County Bond Program. The
estimated cost will be $5,000.00.
RECOMMENDATION:
The staff recommends that the Board approve a resolution to
the VDOT requesting that they accept Shadow Lane into the
Secondary Road System.
SUBMITTED BY:
J6h A. Peters, III, P.~.
Ass~stant Director of
E ineer ing
APPROVED:
~~
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
,,, f Y .,_ ~ ..
. .. . . .. . .... ....... .. ... . . .. ... . .
ACTION VOTE
Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs
Denied ( ) Brittle
Received ( )
Referred
to
Garrett
Johnson
McGraw
Nickens
2
~~ ._. ~s "1 ...$
DEPARTMENT OF LAN E
PUBLIC FACILITIES S H A D O W
~ /
G •
~ ,
g ~ ~ t•
/ 'P
,o
b 1,
/ P
~~
~~ •
•~ ~S
~ !f
6
~., _
..
a~,
~
29
a
~~r
' '
4
2 ^• 21 ~
•
12
~ i
u •
.+ a ~
s
~
~
•1 1
\
+\
14 II N
• 1~ ~
. •
I.
73a
~• 0~
O
$) 23
r t
IS ~
• / 26 3 b ,o
;. S
j .'
.~ . a• ~
/ ~~ ~,
.+sr
~
p
25
•
a• / • ~
~
'0 6
.
~ ~
}
•
/ 5 r
s.ar ~ goo
•
: a: a •~
24 ~ ~ N ~ zar
T 6 '6 .~
~ 4 d
a,• 2s q .• r,
i>A •su `~i ~~ ~ ,o°' y'l 9 O s T s •' 'tier ',r~ 1 U
21 ~ .o°~ a
20 ' ' p•. r•
II ~ p
p /
/
~ ~ g +
`' g c s i
e
y w ~.o
as
'~
Q ~ ,4 f' 12 ~ •+''
• 9r a 10 I
r
•',•'
~ ~ ~ 13
~~
~
NM _
d
p • / v
•• l3
~~ ••r O
~ his G ~
„ 2g
,
`
~ r '
ti" 16 « ~
p ~,oR` ~~z s .r 12 h 29 N ,
Ir
~~~ ~
` ~
~. p
~ ~~ a
~
~ ,
~ ~,
~. a ~ ?T ~
t
/ ~ ai ~ o
^ ~ 51 tJO,
~ 1
=
•~ 18 •' ~
IT ~ • ~ t n 30 I>•
oe
I:
e
......
~` ~=,
AT THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, JUNE 9, 1987
RESOLUTION REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF SHADOW
LANE INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That this matter came this day to be heard upon the
proceedings herein, and upon the application for Shadow Lane to
be accepted and made a part of the Secondary System of State
Highways under Section 33.1-229 of the Virginia State Code.
2. That it appears to the Board that drainage easements
and a fifty (50) foot right-of-way for said road have heretofore
deed dedicated by virtue of a certain maps known as Beacon Hills
Subdivision, which map was recorded in Plat Book 7, Page 25, of
the records of the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke
County, Virginia, on January 8, 1969, and that by reason of the
recordation of said map no report from a Board of Viewers, nor
consent or donation of right-of-way from the abutting property
owners is necessary. The Board hereby guarantees said
right-of-way for drainage.
3. That said road known as Shadow Lane and which is shown
on a certain sketch accompanying this Resolution, be, and the
same is hereby established as a public road to become a part of
the State Secondary System of Highways in Roanoke County, only
from and after notification of official acceptance of said street
or highway by the Virginia Department of Transportation.
THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOAROANOREUCOUNTYOADMINISTRATION
AT VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE R JUNE 9, 1887
COUNTY, CENTER ON TUESDAY,
RESOLUTION 6987-12.e REQUMENT OF TRANSPORTATIONHADOW
LANE INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPART
SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM
IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
BE
County, Virginia, as follows:
to be heard upon the
1, That this matter came this day
in s herein, and upon the application for Shadow Lane to
proceed g
art of the Secondary System of State
be accepted and made a p
inia State Code.
Highways under Section 33.1-229 of the Virg e easements
2, That it appears to the Board that drainag
ift (50) foot right-of-way for said road have heretofore
and a f Y
' ated by virtue of a certain maps known as Beacon Hills
deed dedic Page 25, of
Subdivision, which map was recorded in Plat Book 7,
ords of the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke
the rec reason of the
County, Virginia, on January 8, 1969, and that by
rdation of said map no report from a Board of Viewers, nor
reco ro erty
onsent or donation of right-of-way from the abutting p P
c uarantees said
owners is necessary. The Board hereby g
right-of-way for drainage-
3, That said road known as Shadow Lane and which is shown
and the
this Resolution, be,
on a certain sketch accompanying art of
same is hereby established as a public road to become a P
only
he State Secondary System of Highways in Roanoke County,
t
m and after notification of official acceptance of said stree
fro
or highway by the Virginia Department of Transportation.
On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor
Garrett and upon the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson
NAYS: None
A COPY - TESTE
Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
6/10/87
CC: File
John Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator
John Peters, Assistant Director of Engineering
Arnold Covey, Development Review Coordinator
Va. Department of Transportation
` • ITEM NUMBER~_
R MEETING OF THE BOARD OF pTyEADMINISTRATIONNCENTER
AT A REGULA
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE CO
MEETING DATE: June 9, 1987
SUBJECT• Acceptance of Hi1lgDstem.
o Transportation Secondary Y
into the Virginia Department
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
T ION
SUMMARY OF INFORMA nests that the
The residents of sine pVelaSubdivision re t x,18
resolution to the Virginia
ervisororta pion requesting that they accep
Board of SuP Transp
Department of
miles of Hill Drive. with representatives
The staff has inspected this road along
artment of Transportation and find the road is
of the Virginia Dep
acceptable.
FISCAL IMPACT: ~ Bond Program. The
This is part be $15e000 00oke County
estimated cost will
RECOMMENDATION: rove a resolution to
accept Hill Drive into the
The staff recommethatt theyhe Boar aPP
the VDOT requesting
Secondary Road System.
p,pPROVED
SUBMITTED ~~
6 d~
~~~ P.E. Elmer C. Hodge
n A. Peters, County Administrator
istant Director of
ineering
---------------- ------------------- VOTE yes Abs
-------- ACTION No
Approved ( ) Motion bY: Brittle
Denied ( ) Garrett -
Received ( ) Johnson -
Referred McGraw - -
Nickens -
to
2
o ~,
~-- ~ -
u 60 q
.....c...co ••
\~ o.+ r0) .o..o-c co.....
. d lw.ec. ~~ t
~~
6)6
0~6)~ \
• o
•~~ 22~
o ~ ~
..
60 VICINITY MAP
:~
~ ~'~
~ ~
~ ~
j. ~~ -~
_,
r
NORTH
I2 '
' s.oo nc.
_
_ \
2AOAe 13 s .. 16 ...~ r ~
'•.
3.39Aa• ... 17
~.
.•
1.39Kt0
Z,pypclU Ig ~ Gaul
~ ~ 34.1
Ig L43Ac
~ t' ~•
M
~ •
q2
/ /IfpfJfd ~
vM
C
'
11 /
~
Zf o
!
Bo1Now1
13.S3A~
• 31 ~~
34.2
'
~ a
~~7 v ~
4,47Ae
30~ .
u
IS •
24 ~
• 14.40Ae ~ r
1 •~ 28 M
O ,G~ n
_- .o
k~
ao+•+a~
3s
... ~•'~q.47At~)
8.37/WG1
\..
P/0 X02-1-5 ...
1~~~.
- ~ 39
`~.4 ...~
.~
DEPARTMENT OF p R I V E
ppgLIC FACILITIES H I L L
•.
'~
I
~.
MEETING OF THE BOARD OF EU CpUNTYOADMINISTRATION
AT THE REGUVIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOK JUNE 9, 1987
COUNTY, CENTER ON TUESDAY,
TION REQUESTENT OFCTRANSpORTATIONL
RESOLU
DRIVE INyOROAD SYSTEMIA DEPART
SECONDAR
ESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
BE IT R
County, Virginia, as follows: on the
That this matter came this day to be heard up
1.
lication of Hill Drive to e
s herein, and upon the apP
proceeding g stem of State
accepted and made a part of the Secondary Y
er Section 33.1-229 of the Virginia State Code.
Highways and e easements
2. That it appears to the Board that drainag
foot right-of-way for said road have heretofore
and a fifty (50)
b virtue of a certain map known as Pine Hill
deed dedicated Y page 54, of
division which map was recorded in Plat Book 9,
Sub
the Clerk's Office of he Circuit Court of Roano he
the records of and that by reason of t
County, Virginia, on February 16, 1975,
nor
ion of said map no report from a Board of Viewers,
recordat ro erty
r donation of right-of-way from the abutting P P
consent o
's necessary. The Board hereby guarantees said
owners 1
right-of-way for drainage.
t said road known as Hill Drive and which is shown
3, Tha be, and the
n a certain sketch accompanying this Resolution,
o art of
hereby established as a public road to become a p
same is only
Secondary System of Highways in Roanoke County,
the State tance of said
from and after notification of official accep of Transportation.
street or highway by the Virginia Department
OF THE .BOARD OF SUPERV I YO ADMIN I SORAO ION
AT THE REGUVIRG~ITp,INHELD AT THE ROANOKE JUNET9, 1987
COUNTY, CENTER ON TUESDAY,
N 6987-12.f REQUESTINT OF TRANSPOROTATIONL
RESOLUTIO VIRGINIA DEPARTME
DRIVE INTO THE
SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM ervisors of Roanoke
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Sup
County, Virginia, as follows: ~ on the
That this matter came this day to be heard uP
1.
lication of Hill Drive to e
s herein, and upon the aPP
proceeding S stem of State
accepted and made a part of the Secondary Y
Section 33.1-229 of the Virginia State Code.
Highways under e easements
That it appears to the Board that drainag e heretofore
2.
ift (50) foot right-of-way for said road hav
and a f Y known as Pine Hill
deed dedicated by virtue of a certain map Page 54, of
'vision which map was recorded in Plat Book 9,
Subdi Circuit Court of Roanoke
the records of the Clerk's Office of he reason of the
Vir inia, on February 16, 1975, and that by
County, g Viewers, nor
tion of said map no report from a Board of
recorda ro erty
donation of right-of-way from the abutting p p
consent or
necessary. The Board hereby guarantees sai
owners is
right-of-way for drainage.
said road known as Hill Drive and which is shown
3, That be, and the
a certain sketch accompanying this Resolution,
on art of
established as a public road to become a p
same is hereby only
econdary System of Highways in Roanoke CountY~
the State S tance of said
from and after notification of official accep of Transportation.
street or highway by the Virginia Department
• seconded by Supervisor
On motion of Supervisor Johnson,
Garrett and upon the following recorded vote:
Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson
AYES:
NAYS: None
A COPY - TESTE
Mary H. lien, Deputy Clerk
Board of Supervisors
Roanoke County
6/10/87
CC: File
John Hubbard, Assistant County Adminisineering
John Peters, Assistant Director of Eng
Arnold Covey, Development Review Coordinator
Va. Department of Transportation
ITEM NUMBER=_
AT A REGGINIA HELDNAT THEHROANORE
COUNTY, VIR
MEETING DATE: June 9, 1987
SUBJECT: Acceptance otationaSecondaDylSYstem~
Dept ent of Transpo
OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE
COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
the Virginia
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
is of Westward Lake Subdivision requests that the
resolution to the Virginia
The residen rove a that they accept 0.18
Board of Supervisororta lion requesting
Department of Transp
miles of Indian Hill Drive. with representatives
ected this road along table.
The staff has insp
of the Virginia Department and find the road is acce
FISCAL IMPACT: (1~ gond Program. The
This is part be $40e000.00oke County
estimated cost will
RECOMMENDATION: rove a resolution to
The staff recommends that the Board apP
tin that they accept Indian Hill Drive into the
the VDOT rRoadsSystem.
Secondary
APPROVED:
SUBMITTED ~:
o n A. Peters, III, P.
As istant Director of
Rn ineering
~~~
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
-------------------------------- VOTE yes Abs
----------------- ACTION No
roved ( ) Motion by: Brittle - -
App Garrett - -
Denied ( ) Johnson - - --
Received ( ) McGraw - - -
Referred Nickens - - -
to
2
~,
Ih.'~'• 11)~~
~ ~ ~.-
1 \ ~ '' G•l ~\ \ 4• 1)1
/ ` / O /'
i ~ ~+ C'J~ 009 1)6. . .,~
~,wfl lel / fo
J, .O I ~~ 0,110 ~C:.
o
_ _._._ _ __ ___ ~ INS ~O• O' , .. ~
-/ 0
-__--___-_'~- _~. - ~j1 M~ i 97 ~ a i.0~ o ~
(/ ` t .O ~
._ ("°~ cry v\ °.~o rS4' •O./ V ,.0: ~j NORTH '.
-' _N. -_` --- ,... ` 1 -; VICINITY MAP
;; -
. ~j4
•,,, ,;
13 ~ "7
• ~ ~ b~ s -
•• a
15 ~S 12 ~~ 9
\ ••py T' °
i ~ • I • l ° r ~ 103At
~. 17 • ~ ~, '~ •
.r `' 2.33At •.` ~ u 2477 Y ,s 26- ,. ,- S ! ,-
•
+~ ,•• .51 t, , ~ --_ i - .. 23 ~ ., i~ ,s- " 2T ~ .~°3! % 2 s9d
6 22 : p. • p ~64Ae OI
!!~ .,• .50 .::•,. ":.. .21 a , ~ ~ a 9 o' ~ !`• 1.66 Ac lt1`
p i !I ~ rl ... • :! ~
!s 64 r w e X44 • ~ 4q' r4" . ~! >, 0 !! 60 \IAC
~•o
• ti - .M +, ~ X04.••. ~T .••' ..sr• .40 39 ~ Lov'° ;~ •°,:` SB s xe ~ ~'_
Rut w ~ 1~ ..~ ~ adz °~ ° •, ~~~ ... W~stwpl~ 38 s! ~ ` 7 A ° ' ~~ !o,
v '60 ~ ,~ 4
60.1 - / .~ ,w+• .
N rtf1~i ~..' • ~ ' 4
a »°
1.5pAe 3 • r31 4 ~ tY• +'47`x.•
46
1 ~ `y.! ;~ 42
1/~:.• ~ ~ 4 ~b .~•
'~~ R.C.B.S 9~ '44 ~' .,
2T ~ 32.42AC ,r. ~i 4~ +'41,
tv'•`• 2
0.06Ac 24.1 •• ~. `~`M •40. !s'
26 • ~ ~~ "~
•`,f y.
4 .,, A za ~ ~ ~ '~
°1 J
O .
24 '23 • y+~' ~,
8.10 Ac , ! ' !o
20'` •~
. ! ~ 'b`~
19 ,+
3 '' 19 • •~
51 ~ 2 •! 17b~
1.11 AC Coual StAao/ B°'w0
DEPARTMENT OF ES INDIAN H I ~ ~ R E A D ____--~
PUBLIC FACILITI
v
REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD NOREUCOUNTYOADMINISTRATION
AT THE HELD AT THE ROA 1987
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, JUNE 9,
CENTER ON TUESDAY,
SOLUTION REQUESEp~TMENTpOFNCE OF INDIAN
RE
HILL DRIVE INTO THE VIRGINIA D
TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM
E IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
B
County, Virginia, as follows:
to be heard upon the
1. That this matter came this day
in s herein, and upon the application for Indian Hill
proceed g S stem of
Drive to be accepted and made a part of the Secondary Y
a s under Section 33.1-229 of the Virginia State Code.
State Highw y e easements
2, That it appears to the Board that drainag
• t X50) foot right-of-way for said road have heretofore
and a fif y
' ated by virtue of a certain map known as Westward Lake
deed dedlc page 200, of
Subdivision which map was recorded in Plat Book 3,
s of the Clerk's Office of he Circuit Court of Roanoke
the record reason of the
County- Virginia, on February 23, 1956, and that by
dation of said map no report from a Board of Viewers, nor
recor ro erty
nsent or donation of right-of-way from the abutting P P
co
owners is necessary. The Board hereby guarantees sai
right-of-way for drainage.
That said road known as Indian Hill Drive and which is
3. be, and
shown on a certain sketch accompanying this Resolution,
hereby established as a public road to become a part
the same is only
he State Secondary System of Highways in Roanoke County,
of t tance of said
from and after notification of official acceP of Transportation.
street or highway by the Virginia Departmen
HE BOARD OF SUPERVISORSMINISOTRAOION
AT THE REGULAR MEETING OF T JUNE 9, 1987
NTY VIRGINIA, HELD AT TpNETUESDAYE COUNTY AD
COU - CENTER
987_12, REQUESTINGT~NTpOFi•]CE OF INDIAN
RESOLUTION G
HILL DRIVE INNOSECONDARYIROADDSYSTEM
TRANSPORTATIO
OLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
gE IT RES
County, Virginia, as follows: on the
That this matter came this day to be heard up
1.
and upon the application for Indian Hil
proceedings herein, S stem of
be accepted and made a part of the Secondary Y
Drive to of the Virginia State Code.
State Highways under Section 33.1-229 e easements
2, That it appears to the Board that drainag
oot right-of-waY for said road have heretofore
and a fifty (50~ f
irtue of a certain map known as Westward Lake
deed dedicated by v page 200, of
' ision which map was recorded in Plat Book 3' t of Roanoke
Subdly
ecords of the Clerk's Office of he Circuit Courreason of the
the r and that by
County, Virginia, on February 23, 1956,
nor
'on of said map no report from a Board of Viewers,
recordati ro erty
r donation of right-of-way from the abutting p P
consent o
rs is necessary. The Board hereby guarantees sai
owne
right-of-way for drainage-
road known as Indian Hill Drive and which is
3, That said be, and
a certain sketch accompanying this Resolution,
shown on
established as a public road to become a par
the same is hereby only
Secondary System of Highways in Roanoke County,
of the State
after notification of official acceptance of saltation.
from and
r hi hway by the Virginia Department of Transpor
street o g
` seconded by Supervisor
On motion of Supervisor Johnson,
ett and upon the following recorded vote:
Garr McGraw, Nickens, Johnson
Supervisors Brittle, Garrett,
AYES
NAYS: None
A COpy - TESTE
J~ ~
Deputy Clerk
Mary H. Al1en- Board of Supervisors
Roanoke County
6/10/87
File Assistant County Administrator
CC: of Engineering
John Hubbard,
John Peters, Assistant Director oordinator
Development Review C
Arnold Covey, ortation
Va. Department of Transp
r
AT A REGULAIA HELD ATOTHE ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGIN
ITEM NUMBER.--
OF STyEADMINISTRATION CENTER
COON
MEETING DATE: June 9, 1987
oint Road into the
tance of Airpoint Drive and Airp S stem.
SUBJECT: Accep ortation Secondary Y
Vir-- g-" n a Department of Transp
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
TION:
SUMMARY OF INFORMA requests that the
oint Subdivision inia
The residents of Airpove a resolution to thaccepg0,26
ervisors aPP uesting that they
Board of Sup ortation req oint Road.
Department of Transp 26 miles of Airp
miles of Airpoint Drive and 0. yi i th
ected these roads along
T h e s t a f f h a s i n s p o f Transportation and
representatives of the Virginia Department
find these roads are acceptable.
FISCAL IMPACT: ~ Bond Program. The
This is part °e $150,000 poke County
estimated cost will b
RECOMMENDATION: rove a resolution to
that the Board app oint
The staff recommends accept Airpoint Drive and Airp
the VDOT requesting that they stem.
Road into the Secondary Road Sy
pppROVED
SUBMITTED BY:
- ~~ ~
.~ Elmer C. Hodge
eters, III, P.E. County Administrator
J ~
istant Director of
F ineering
r
-----------
--------- VOTE
--------------------------ACTION No Yes Abs
Approved ( ) Motion by: Brittle
Denied ( ) Garrett
Received ( ) Johnson
Referred McGraw
to Nickens
2
N 6
7i e
~~ ° ,,. 'Site :~~.~~ ~ ~~'
~ ~ .,r ~/
z ~ c 3 °„ ~ r
~ 1°, ~ rii ~/ ~
1 ~- ~
wr i ~' i
°...
~ o~ .....,. N K L
_.. -.
`)~ ..
~~ ,a ~ ~~.,~ VICINITY MAP
2.51 AclDl
~ .70 Ac lCl
,18 ~9
88-1z ~' 34.4
7 _ 1V, -,
2?
Q. L8 F+~+
i
1`
4~ \\ ; c.a ~ ,~~
c ~ ~ ~1 \ / '
• C` ~ a ~~
~, q q'; AG
_ -
DEPARTMENT OF A~Rpp~NT DR• & RD•
PUBLIC FACILITIES
AT THE REGULAR MEETING OF THETHE ROANOKEUCOUNTYOADMINISTRATION
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT
CENTER ON TUESDAY, JUNE 9, 1987
RESOLUTION REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF
AIRPOINT ROAD AND ~''PORTATIONRSECONDARYTROADISYSTEM
DEPARTMENT OF TRANS
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That this matter came this day to be heard upon the
roceedings herein, and upon the application for Airpoint Road
P
and Airpoint Drive to be accepted and made a part of the he
Secondary System of State Highways under Section 33.1-229 of t
Virginia State Code.
2. That it appears to the Board that drainage easements
and a fifty (50) foot right-of-way for said roads have heretofore
deed dedicated by virtue of a certain map known as Airpoint
Page 45 of the
Subdivision which map was recorded in Plat Book 6,
records of the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke
reason of the
County, Virginia, on July 9, 1965, and that by
recordation of said map no report from a Board of Viewers, nor
from the abutting property
consent or donation of right-of-way
owners is necessary. The Board hereby guarantees said
right-of-way for drainage.
3, That said roads known as Airpoint Road and Airpoint
this
Drive and which is shown on a certain sketch accompanying
Resolution, be, and the same is hereby established as public
stem of Highways in
roads to become part of the State Secondary Sy
Roanoke County, only from and after notification of official
acceptance of said streets or highway by the Virginia Department
of Transportation.
E REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARDANOKEUCOUNTYOADMINISTRATION
AT TH HELD AT THE RO 1987
COUNTY, VIRGINIA,
CENTER ON TUESDAY- JUNE ~
RESOLUTION 6987-12.h REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF
AIRPOINT ROAD AND AIRPTATIONRSECONDARYTROADISYSTEM
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPOR
IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
BE
County, Virginia, as follows:
to be heard upon the
1, That this matter came this day Dint Road
roceedings herein, and upon the application for Airp
P art of the
and Airpoint Drive to be accepted and made a p
r S stem of State Highways under Section 33.1-229 of the
Seconda y Y
Virginia State Code. a easements
2, That it appears to the Board that drainag
fift (50) foot right-of-way for said roads have heretofore
and a Y Dint
dedicated by virtue of a certain map known as Airp
deed e 45 of the
Subdivision which map was recorded in Plat Book 6, Pag
of the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke
records
Vir inia, on July 9, 1965, and that by reason of the
County, g nor
recordation of said map no report from a Board of Viewers,
from the abutting property
consent or donation of right-of-way
The Board hereby guarantees said
owners is necessary.
right-of-way for drainage.
That said roads known as Airpoint Road and Airpoint
3.
and which is shown on a certain sketch accompanying this
Drive ublic
Resolution, be, and the same is hereby established as p
S stem of Highways in
roads to become part of the State Secondary Y
County, only from and after notification of official
Roanoke
acceptance of said streets or highway by the Virginia Department
of Transportation.
On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor
on the following recorded vote:
Garrett and up
Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson
AYES:
NAYS: None
A COPY - TESTE
Mary H. llen, Deputy Clerk
Board of Supervisors
Roanoke County
6/10/S7
CC: File
John Hubbard, Assistant County Adminisinee~ing
John Peters, Assistant Director of Eng
Arnold Covey, Development Review Coordinator
Va. Department of Transportation
.~
ITEM NUMBER ~~ -
THE BOARD OF SUPERVMINISTRATIOI`I CENTER
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF
IRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY
COUNTY- V
MEETING DATE: June 9, 1987
into the Virginia
Acceptance of Lakemont Drive S stem.
SUB~~ of Transportation Secondary Y
Department
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
requests that
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Sudivision Virginia
of Frmingdale South to the t 0.56
The residents rove a resoluion they accep
ervisors apP requesting that
the Board of Sup ortation
Department of Transp
with representatives
miles of Lakemont Drive. road along the road is
has inspected this find
The staff of Transportation and
Virginia Department
of the
acceptable.
FISCAL IMPACT:
This is part
estimated cost will
anoke County Bond Project. The
of the Ro
be $35,000.00
~~~ , 1
rove a resolutio the
RECOMMENDATION: into
recommends that the BtaLakemont Drive
The staff that they accep
the VDOT requesting
Secondary Road System.
AppROVED:
SUBMITTED Bn
~ ~ III- P. E.
n A, eters- of
t Director
~G~
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
~~istan -----------------------------------
gineering
__----- VOTE yes Abs
----------------------- ACTION No
~ Motion bY~ Brittle - -
Approved ( Garrett - -
Denied ( ~ Johnson -
Received ( ~ McGraw - -
Referred Nickens -
to ~~
>~
i~~
/~
,~~,
VICINITY MAF
DEPARTMENT OF
PUBLIC FACILITIES
ice"-~ ~-
~~
~AKEMpNT DRIVE
~~-~~~1
GULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OpKEUCOUNTYOADMINISTRP,TION
AT THE RE VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROAN JUNE 9r 1987
COUNTY, CENTER ON TUESDAY,
RESOLUTION VIRGINIA DEPARTMENTCOFOF
LAKEMONT DRIVE INTO THE
TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM ervisors of
the Board of Sup
BE IT RESOLVED by
Virginia, as follows: on the
Roanoke County, to be heard up
1. That this matter came this day
erein, and upon the application of Lakemont Drive to
proceedings h
ted and made a part of the Secondary System of State
be accep
s under Section 33.1-229 of the Virginia State Code.
Highway e easements
2. That it appears to the Board that drainag
(50) foot right-of-way for said road have heretofore
and a fifty
' ated by virtue of a certain map known as Farmingdale
deed dedic page 5,
h Subdivision which map was recorded in Plat Book 8,
Sout
e records of the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court ° son
of th and that by rea
on August 13, 1974,
Roanoke County, Virginia,
ecordation of said map no report from a Board of Viewers,
of the r
consent or donation of right-of-way from the abutting
nor uarantees said
property owners is necessary. The Board hereby g
right-of-way for drainage.
That said road known as Lakemont Drive and which is
3. be, and
shown on a certain sketch accompanying this Resolution,
is hereby established as public roads to become a part
the same only
e State Secondary System of Highways in Roanoke County,
of th
d after notification of official acceptance of said
from an ortation.
streets or highway by the Virginia Department of Transp
AT THE REGULAR MEETINHEOD ATETHEAROANOgEUCOUNTY ADMINISTRATION
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, 1987
CENTER ON TUESDAY, JUNE 9,
RESOLUTION 6987INT01 THE V 4RGINIAGDEPARTMENT OF
LAREMONT DRIVE
TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of
Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: to be heard upon t he
1. That this matter came this day
proceedings herein, and upon the application of Lakemont Drive to
be accepted and made a part of the Secondary System of State
Highways under Section 33.1-229 of the Virginia State Code.
2. That it appears to the Board that drainage easements
and a fifty (50) foot right-of-way for said road have heretofore
deed dedicated by virtue of a certain map known as Farmingdale
South Subdivision which map was recorded in Plat Book 8, Page 5,
of the records of the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of
Roanoke County, Virginia, on August 13, 1974, and that by reason
of the recordation of said map no report from a Board of Viewers,
nor consent or donation of right-of-way from the abutting
property owners is necessary. The Board hereby guarantees said
right-of-way for drainage.
3, That said road known as Lakemont Drive and which is
shown on a certain sketch accompanying this Resolution, be, and
the same is hereby established as public roads to become a part
of the State Secondary System of Highways in Roanoke County- only
from and after notification of official acceptance of said
streets or highway by the Virginia Department of Transportation.
On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor
Garrett and upon the following recorded vote:
AYES:
NAYS:
'sors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson
Supervi
None
A Cppy - TESTS
ut Clerk
Mary H. Allen, Dep Y
Board of Supervisors
Roanoke County
6/lp/87
CC: File Assistant County Administrator
John Hubbard, of Engineering
John Peters, Assistant Director
ovey, Development Review Coordinator
Arnold C tment of Transportation
Va. Depar
,., .
~ /' (D r'l
ITEM NUMBER / ?_
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE ANOKE COUNTYEADMINISTRATIONNCENTER
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE RO
MEETING DATE: June 9, 1987
SUBJECT: Acceptance of Memory Leine into the Virginia Department
of- T ansportation Secondary Syst
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The residents of Tinker Kn a11resol ution togthe sVirginia
Board of Supervisors approve accept 0.04
Department of Transportation requesting that they
miles of Memory Lane.
FISCAL IMPACT:~~ ram. The
This is part of the Roanoke County Bond Prog
estimated cost will be $15,000.00.
RECOMMENDATION:
The staff recommends that the Board approve a resolution to
the VDOT requesting that they accept Memory Lane into the
Secondary Road System.
~~ . 1 ~ ~ ,~
APPROVED:
SUBMITTED By:
• Peters, III, p• E•
n A.
istant Director of
ineering
v~
~'~ ~
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
__ ------------- --------- VOTE yes Abs
----------- ACTION No
Motion bY: Brittle
Approved ( ~ Garrett
Denied ( ~ Johnson
Received ( ~ McGraw
Referred Nickens
to ~-
. _,.
Y .
le M~ a/
VICINi'r__
11~
O
f
~'~ f ,.~ (~, ~ ~~
NORTH
a
1.90 Ac
~ _\
7796 K d~ ZO ~ r
- 5.1 ~#4 /
R,C6S RGaS t • I.p6Ae ' ~ ~ ,
21 ~
as _ R.C8.5. r ~ /
18 22 ~t
~ i
acts. • 6 ~
' ~• ~ V' 4 r' 23 x~ loo Ac ,E9a
O ~ ~ R,GBS~ '.
~ ' .. ~ 24 ty
~ / i
y a t
r 15 / ~~ ~ 2'3 ra 6
N1 / 9 'ht~ ~. 1 ~2 `i
.+ 12 O ~ ti /
2 r ~ cis II / / 1 / a / t
r ~ / T ~ 4,
T II ~'a O ~ / 2 /
~ooAc ' to / 12 r ~ .
6 rr /
e ar ~ a 13 O /p 9 ~' /
`O 9 mod' S 3 •• „ " °,. p r~ /
~~ ~ ~ ~
/~ g 0P 4• r:~ 9 F / i 'Q
~ ~~4~ s 3 ~ I6 ti • ~a..y 8 21
3 2 u a ~/ 6 op ~
.~4 ~ ~ \ M r~s « ~y S ~~~ ~ ~ \ r
2
' ! ~ IB co~~ ~ O $ $ 19 5
• ~ ~ n
• / .
- 1 ~ ~•i ~~ 15 i~ r
• K t~
,\ .,. ~ ~, / 16 ,
/ I ., ~c
IT a i
O ~ d ` N '•
~` ,v ~ IS 9
6,~ ~ ~ ~ 4 t
~c~ 7 ~. n / i~aa •
~' ~ •~
18 ~ ' ~~,,w AI
/ p ~~4 r ~ ~
OAS C~ 1
/~,.
'f~~ = -- -
DEPARTMFACILITIES MEMORY ~ A N E
PUBLIC
4
5.4:1
O
_ 1~
r s , p
~.._..
AT THE REGULAR MEETINHELD ATETHEP'ROANOKEUCOUNTYOADMOINISTRATION
COUNTY, VIRGINIA,
CENTER ON TUESDAY, JUNE 9, 1987
RESOLUTION REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF MEMORY
LANE INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That this matter came this day to be heard upon the
proceedings herein, and upon the application for Memory Lane to
be accepted and made a part of the Secondary System of State
Highways under Section 33.1-229 of the Virginia State Code.
2. That it appears to the Board that drainage easements
and a fifty (50) foot right-of-way for said road have heretofore
deed dedicated by virtue of a certain map known as Tinker Knoll
Subdivision which map was recorded in Plat Book 5, Page 10, of
the records of the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke
County, Virginia, on October 23, 1961, and that by reason of the
recordation of said map no report from a Board of Viewers, nor
consent or donation of right-of-way from the abutting property
owners is necessary. The Board hereby guarantees said
right-of-way for drainage.
3, That said road known as Memory Lane shown on a certain
sketch accompanying this Resolution, be, and the same is hereby
established as a public road to become a part of the of the State
Secondary System of Highways in Roanoke County, only from and
after notification of official acceptance of said street or
highway by the Virginia Department of Transportation.
T THE REGULAR MEETINHELD ATETHEAROANOKEUCOUNTYOADMOINISTRATION
COUNTY, VIRGINIA. JUNE g~ 1987
CENTER ON TUESDAY,
RESOLUTION 6987-12.j REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF MEMORY
LANE INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1, That this matter came this day to be heard upon the
proceedings herein, and upon the application for Memory Lane to
be accepted and made a part of the Secondary System of State
Highways under Section 33.1-229 of the Virginia State Code.
2, That it appears to the Board that drainage easements
and a fifty ( 50 ) foot right-of-way for said road have heretofore
deed dedicated by virtue of a certain map known as Tinker Knoll
Subdivision which map was recorded in Plat Book 5, Page 10, of
the records of the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke
County, Virginia, on October 23, 1961, and that by reason of the
recordation of said map no report from a Board of Viewers, nor
consent or donation of right-of-way from the abutting property
owners is necessary. The Board hereby guarantees said
right-of-way for drainage.
3, That said road known as Memory Lane shown on a certain
sketch accompanying this Resolution, be, and the same is hereby
established as a public road to become a part of the of the State
Secondary System of Highways in Roanoke County, only from and
after notification of official acceptance of said street or
highway by the Virginia Department of Transportation.
of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor
On motion
Garrett and upon the following recorded vote:
isors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson
AYES: Superv
NAYS: None
A COPY - TESTE
/'~ v
Deputy Clerk
Mary H. llen- ervisors
Board of Sup
Roanoke County
6/10/87
CC: File Assistant County Administrator
John Hubbard, En ineering
John Peters, AssistanmeD~rReV°ew Coordinator
Arnold Covey, Develop
Va. Department of Transportation
~~ ~
ITEM NUMBER ~W~ `~
AT A REGULAR MEETINGTOTHEHROANOKE COUNTYEADMINISTRATIONNCENTER
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD A
MEETING DATE: June 9, 1987
SUB_ J_ ECT; Acceptance of Streets in the LaBellevue Subdivision
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
the Board of Supervisors approved a report to
Previously,
accept the remaining streets in Sections 4,5,6,7,8 and 9 °f rove
LaBellevue Subdivision. At this time, the Board needs to app
the attached resolution requesting Virginia Department of
Transportation (VDOT) to accept these streets.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The Board previously appropriated $43,003 of
for improvements to these roads.
RECOMMENDATION:
The staff recommends
the VDOT requesting that
the LaBellevue Subdivision
Road Bond Funds
that the Board approve a resolution to
they accept the remaininstemreets in
into the Secondary Road Sy
SUBMITTED BY:
~ /~ /
i / _~ ~ -
-~_
.~
J p,, eters, III, P. E.
ssistant Director of
Fh ineering
APPROVED:
~~
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
_ -----
________ --------------- -- VOTE
-- ACTION No yes Abs
Approved ( ) Motion by: Brittle
Denied ( ) Garrett
Received ( ) Johnson
Referred McGraw
to Nickens
PROPOSED ADDITION SHOWN IN WHITi
DESCRIPTION: COACHMAN DRIVE
LENGTH: 0.35 MILES
R/W WIDTH: 50'
ROADWAY WIDTH: 29'
SURFACE WIDTH: 20'
SERVICE: 38
IMPROVEMENTS TO BE MADE: NONE
r
RESIDENT ENGINEERS RECOMMENDATION:
ROANOKE COUNTY SUBDIVISION STREETS
DATE OF RESOLUTION:
DATE OF ACCEPTANCE:
PROPOSED ADDITIONS SHOWN IN WHITE
DESCRIPTION: COACHMAN CIR.
LENGTH: 0.19 MILES
R/W WIDTH: 60'
ROADWAY ~TIDTH: 29'
SURFACE WIDTH: 20'
SERVICE: 25
IMPROVEMENTS TO BE MADE: NONE
RESIDENT ENGINEERS RECOMMENDATION:
ROANOKE COUNTY SUBDIVISION STREETS
DATE OF RESOLUTION:
naTF nF ACCEPTANCE:
F ~ ~
A R
ROANOKE COUNTY SUBDIVISION STREETS
DATE OF RESOLUTION:
DATE OF ACCEPTANCE:
~_~ COACHMAN CIR.
PROPOSED ADDITIONS SHOWN IN WHITE
DESCRIPTION: FOREST OAK DRIVE
LENGTH: 0.22 MILES
R/W WIDTH: 60'
ROADWAY WIDTH: 29'
SURFACE WIDTH: 20'
SERVICE: 16
IM~'ROVEMENTS TO BE MADE: NONE
RESIDENT ENGINEERS RECOMMANDATION:
ROANOKE COUNTY SUBDIVISION STREETS
DATE OF RESOLUTION:
DATE OF ACCEPTANCE:
~nAD
}
N
I
PROPOSED ADDITION SHOWN IN WHITE
DESCRIPTION: SUMMIT RIDGE ROAD TO :,UL-DE-SAC
LENGTH: 0.79 MILES
R/W WIDTH: 60'
ROADWAY WIDTH: 20'
SURFACE WIDTH: 20'
SERVICE: 54
IMPROVEMENTS TO BE MADE: NONE
RESIDENT ENGINEERS RECOMMENDATION:
r
AT THE REGULAR MEETINELDFATTHEBROANORE COUNTYIADMINOISTRATIONE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, H
CENTER ON TUESDAY, JUNE 9, 1987
RESOLUTION REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF
FOREST OAK DRIVE, COACHMAN CIRCLE, COACHMAN DRIVE
AND SUMMIT TATIONRSECONDARYTROADISYSTEM DEPARTMENT
OF TRANSPOR
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1, That this matter came this day to be heard upon the
proceedings herein, and upon the application for Forest Oak
Drive, Coachman Circle, Coachman Drive and Summit Ridge Road to
be be accepted and made a part of the Secondary System of State
Highways under Section 33.1-229 of the Virginia State Code.
2. That it appears to the Board that drainage easements
and a fifty (50) foot right-of-way for said roads have heretofore
been dedicated by virtue of certain maps known as LaBellevue
Sections 4,5,6,7,8 and 9, which maps was recorded in Plat Book 8,
Page 35 and Plat Book 9, Pages 8, 78, 150, 260 and 261 of records
of the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County,
Virginia, on January 11, 1973; October 4, 1974; November 15,
1876; November 13, 1979 and October 12, 1983 and that by reason
of the recordation of said maps no report from a Board of
Viewers, nor consent or donation of right-of-way from the
abutting property owners is necessary. The Board hereby
guarantees said right-of-way for drainage.
~~-~ ~°
3. That said roads known as Forest Oak Drive, Coachman
Circle, Coachman Drive and Summit Ridge Road are shown on a
certain sketch accompanying this Resolution, be, and the same are
hereby established as public roads to become a part of the State
Secondary System of Highways in Roanoke County, only from and
after notification of official acceptance of said streets or
highway by the Virginia Department of Transportation.
h AT THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD A THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, JUNE 9, 1987
RESOLUTION 6987-12.k REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF
FOREST OAK DRIVE, COACHMAN CIRCLE, COACHMAN DRIVE
AND SUMMIT RIDGE ROAD INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT
OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That this matter came this day to be heard upon the
proceedings herein, and upon the application for Forest Oak
Drive, Coachman Circle, Coachman Drive and Summit Ridge Road to
be be accepted and made a part of the Secondary System of State
Highways under Section 33.1-229 of the Virginia State Code.
2. That it appears to the Board that drainage easements
and a fifty (50) foot right-of-way for said roads have heretofore
been dedicated by virtue of certain maps known as LaBellevue
Sections 4,5,6,7,8 and 9, which maps was recorded in Plat Book 8,
Page 35 and Plat Book 9, Pages 8, 78, 150, 260 and 261 of records
of the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County,
Virginia, on January 11, 1973; October 4, 1974; November 15,
1976; November 13, 1979 and October 12, 1983 and that by reason
of the recordation of said maps no report from a Board of
Viewers, nor consent or donation of right-of-way from the
abutting property owners is necessary. The Board hereby
guarantees said right-of-way for drainage.
3. That said roads known as Forest Oak Drive, Coachman
Circle, Coachman Drive and Summit Ridge Road are shown on a
certain sketch accompanying this Resolution, be, and the same are
hereby established as public roads to become a part of the State
only from and
ar System of HighwaYs.in Roanoke County,
Second Y tance of said streets or
after notification of official act of Transportation.
inia Departmen
highway by the Virg Supervisor
motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by
On
arrett and upon the following recorded vote:
G McGraw, Nickens, Johnson
Supervisors Brittle, Garrett,
AYES:
NAYS: None
A Copy - TESTE
Clerk
Mary H. Allen, Deputy
Board of Supervisors
Roanoke County
6/10/87
CC: File Assistant County Administrator
Engineering
John Hubbard,
John Peters, Assistant Director of
Development Review Coordinator
Arnold Covey, ortation
Va. Department of Transp
A-6987-12M
ITEM NUMBER
T A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARS COUNTYEADMINISTRATIONNCENTER
A
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANO
MEETING DATE: June 9, 1987
SUBJECT: Acceptance of Sewer Facilities
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
for Allred Chevrolet
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: ALCO Properties, has
The developer of Allred Chevrolet, the sewer
requested that Roanoke County accept the deed conveying
easements.
lines serving the project along with all necessary
ineering plans
The sewer linerker & Son ent t ledsh Allred eChevrolet dated
prepared by T. P. Pa
er 6, 1985, which are on file in the Publiecifications
Septemb
Department. The sewer bin~heoCountytion meets t e sp
and the plans approved Y
FISCAL IMPACT:
The value of the sewer construction is $7,600.00.
RECOMMENDATION: ervisors accept
The staff recommends that ttheBprojectS al ong with all
the sewer facilitieSand authorize the County Administrator to
necessary easements
execute a Deed for the transfer of these facilities.
~ ~
SUBMITTED By:
ppPROVED
Phillip Henry
Director of Engineering
~~
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
--------------- ------------------- VOTE yes Abs
--------- ACTION No
Approved QC ) Motion by: BLJ/LGG t=pnrov.~ Brittle ~.-
Denied ~ ) Garrett .~-
Received ( ) Johnson ~-
Referred McGraw ~-
Nickens ~-
to
cc: File
Phillip Henry
Clifford Craig
/ r ~~
NORTH
,,
1
~,
t
_.~ , _
p ~~ N ~•
~- .~ ,, _/
115 I i4
\Q n~
I16 i
\ ~ ,.
DEPARTMENT OF
PUBLIC FACILITIES
I
`~ °~/ I IB ~~ i 19 ,i , 2C ~I~
~ ~ I
~ ,
~ <f
r' y_
1
~s ~~ ' .,~_41
rq
~,.
1~-i p. tl 9
~~ 47 .~ 46
~~
~~ ~ ~
ACCRED CHEVROLET
A-6987-12L
Item 0~""
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
IN ROANOKE, VA., ON TUESDAY,
MEETING DATE: June 9, 1987
SUBJECT: VDOT Matching Fund Request for Industrial Access Road
Improvement to Bolling Steel
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS/:
(~; urv~l
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The Board of Supervisors previously approved a request for indus-
trial access funds for Bolling Steel Corporation in the Glenvar
area. The Code of Virginia provides that counties may request
matching funds from VDOT to upgrade or maintain roads in the
Secondary Highway System. Since part of the road leading to
Bolling Steel is part of an old subdivision, matching funds can
be used to upgrade the road to state standards. The owners of
Bolling Steel have expressed an interest in providing $15,000
toward a match.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Board request VDOT for a matching
allocation of $15,000 to upgrade portions of the road to Bolling
Steel.
SUBMITTED BY:
'~~ G~1.
Timothy W. ubala, Assistant
County Ad n~i' nistrator
APPROVED:
~~~
Elmer C. Hodge, Jr.
County Administrator
n A. 'Peters, III, P.E., Assistant
ector of Engineering
,,.. ' .
Approved (K) Motion by: BLJ/LG to a
VOTE
Denied ( ) staff recommendation pprove No Yes Abs
Received ( ) Brittle X
Referred Garrett X
To Johnson ~'
McGraw X
Nickens X
Attachment
cc: File
Tim Gubula
John Peters, Engr.
_~°,~!~!
..v
~; `, ,;
f
~~
(3OllING STEEL COMf'~NY, INC.
STEEL FABRICATORS • (703) 389-1822
P O BOX 1082
5933 GARMAN ROAD
SALEM, VIRGINIA 24153
May 28, 1987
Department of Development
County of Roanoke
P. 0. BoxVA9804018
Roanoke,
Attn: Mr. Timothy W. Gubala
~- ~
Dear Tim:
This is to confirm that we will provide funds up to $15,000.00
to be used for developing Garman Road as shown on Plat Book 3,
Page 51, from where the aspha0rnerrofcLot 25endFortoLeweseEstates.
joins the southeastern most c
Very truly yours,
BOLLING STEEL CO., INC.
Jarnes C. B lling, Sr.
JCB/as
r.~~r~,E,E:IZ ~°
T'I'E:M __
(~F OU}~E(ZV1 ,rDK;; iJF KOANt';':•:
'I'H[: f1c)A[?D ISTRh'T'ION t:i~.N'It;lt
'OI.h(Z i-,.,r~.`I'iNG OF COUNTY ADMIN
V L ki(~ I CJ 111 EiI~:I,D AT
June 9, 1987
SUI~,II',~''_I'__ YOUTH HAVEI~ I I Project S+a}us Report
t,r_;t;~;'l'Y ~11)M T N 1 ;;'1 ttn'Ct)IZ ~.~' ~'OMMI N'I"_~ __
;;i)r•Er•E~~IiY _(~t--I NE_t)[<M!~'I'1i)[~+_
-__.. _ =
the amoun-' of ~39,78r~.6(~
P,uiding~ a U.S.D. A. check in
785.10 w't I I be 1~r ~ hcorr,t ng
that
We t-rave been ina°~"`~dtother check. for $22' in9 our i<.;tcr,en.
nn its ~~~av 1o us L, we have
'~'~ basement renova~~or:'~
These are reimhur-jemenf` iO~guyredaU~S`~D~Ad equo $3,608.22. `"Je have submitted
a~ i ng thc. new y th ~ s project t rGVa I i S ob1- J i nE,d, we ~,v i l l
i2eg '-~ cost of When aPP
been ab I r; to r-educe th:' rova I .
~.L),A, for aPP
the new f i y~rP ~° l,.
proceed to ~,onstruction.
Progran'~ D~ ~.o- P=~~en--------.dm i n i str~ t ° n' ~;~ve current 1 y
-~ been operating very smoothly P several
a I "t cants, and n<-~
our program has be ma'r.i n9
y far, ~ nave interviewed f°Our Pesidents appear ~" .
.- ~i~r, par; ;c., ;t,
have tht .~' res s dent ,
terml ~ -ro be interviewed. , Y,cul+>
'-hat- they all attend schoo i regu l a ;
rr a ~i ,
adj~tir,n,~j t-~ ~„- ~ ,
an, ,
sic=rr~i f i~'~,,t progrt ,_, in ~ roc ram ,y~,tnout ~'
l ~]C1-iviti`%5 and p ~
c:.~,? r
i r thc~ rr y rii~VE,~ I Mr, Trent src,
r~ ~~gn'i,cor,T
- ~ .- oc1: 'th P~lr. Ritchie, ~ try 7E ~ ~ '
>c-; rar, ,
', a~ c°nt;nutny meetings °'~` ~~ for placement sl°' u_, h _ ~ t cr
t c~mcr~f a1 ion procedur,~ ~ I meeting or; this i s
r~"~rdin~ 'irf,ii r, iOna Oil ~-=
r_~ti h; ~c_ ry re i ona
being n~,adc Corrections 9 t~ t ;, I I r~~~ 1
pro re's ~ s ~ n-t of
g ~t3 7 at +he .Departm N1s . N ~a ~~ ~ ! ac ~i ~ V i r ~ n : a
July ~ ~„ ~-I ion c°n1 t nuFS . -
1~ , ..I~, ~,~, ~,~ I ic,._ Dun'nam, ~ack ~ r~'n~
-~~ count t ng forms. ~~ ~". +
b~;~:;r 4< ot, the ~ ~ ,
June 3, 1987 to me~=± h
short) ~ ~-~~ ~~~ rho ~uc~h th'U rt HAVEN I I _on
~, r~ I i cc.,n~,.~ t~ ~ 1 ~ if`T
r ~a n r ~ ~~` `
,tle ' r i, tion. the R.oanok.e ~
r,,,,1 :>ropc-r- io trr com 1e developer ~,v'tth _ r,at ~r-,;cedureS.
c]nci I aJ ~' ~ fUat t On p I an Was trained 1 n a,Jpl O~ F,,-Pntat l Ciii
A hostage s'~ staff '
r,, _ 'wren t hood and part i c i pafi`'d ~~ n a Pr-.,_,
Team .`his month and a I I ~nnedt imF
C?ur staff also toured
~,',' the'; r staff .
~,
{'r~bl+~c; r<elatlon~>: s p'~!;~Iisheci
_ _ _.-- - I he "Cor~~mun i c. ator
+- f our newsle.t-ter, ,
Fifth eul ~ ~°f' v r;s~';r~~ ~ic,r'. ab°~'~~~
Our ~ thts; rrr~nth' ;tar ~tcur-ed and received ~~Oi'~UJ ntrir'Ution
,_~:1d 111 c. 1 12~ ~h~~ F=aster-tl ~ C i P, ~ ~ E;n~1 =~
~ ~r of ted 1-O re VE'. a ~, <~,:I- r E'~~f ~J
The Jrdc, ii for ~, ~ `'~'
-~~ I ~ We erc~ most ar
v~'r_ITH HAVt~~. ~• a~. 1 h i> n ,nc,y w i l l he I p pay
re;!t them the same ~ - ,
~ : s summer .
-~-
The staffi ofi the Roanoke City Court Se~~J~devt,thtoarsfac4lity a~ndTouHAVEN II
this month. I believe they were very lrnpr
program.
Personnel:
full time night counselor, Ms. Tanya 4ti'illiams came on board ~°lay
Ms. Stacy Williams began
15, 1987, and our regular night relief counselor, eo le as
work May 8, 1987. Additionally, we have hired the following p P
back-up night relief counselors, fior occasional work: Ms. Antoinette Tucker
and Ms. Gay Mofifiitt.
Gn N1ay 17, 1987, we advertised for additional day reliefi workers. Ue
~.~ill be needing these people as staff staja87o use vacation time this summer.
Closing date for applications is May 27,
SUBMITTED BY.
APPROVED BY:
~~~
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
- VOTE
------------------------ ACTSON No Xes E.
p,pproved ( ) Motion by: ~.--. Brittle -
Denied ( > Ga.rrett -
Received ( ) - __ Johnson _ -
Referred _____--- McGraw
T o ~- - _ ----_ N i c k e n s