The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About5/26/1987 - Regular ~ O~ OANp~ F ~ ,A L ~ar~rrt~ ~~ ~~~~~r~~ ~_ ~ 1838 ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ACTION AGENDA MAY 26, 1987 Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meeting. Regular meetings are held on the second Tuesday of each month at 2:00 p.m., and on the fourth Tuesday of each month at 3:00 p.m. Public Hearings will be heard at 7:00 p.m on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule:~will be announced. A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.) 1. Roll Call. 2. Invocation: The Reverend Sam Crews Coopers Cove Baptist Church - 3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag. B. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS ANNOUNCED JOHN WILLEY HAS RECEIVED PROFESSIONAL DESIGNATION FROM THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF APPRAISERS C. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS ADDED RESOLUTION OF CONGRATULATIONS TO INGERSOLL-RAND TO BE PRESENTED IN THE EVENING SESSION D. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS AND AWARDS E. NEW BUSINESS 1. Report on Drainage (WILL BE PRESENTED AT 7:00 P.M.) 2. Request to locate the State Forensic Science Laboratory behind Southview School. - AHB/LG TO DONATE.LAND TO STATE FOR FORENSIC LAB - URC 3. Request for Approval of Pilot Recycling Project. AHB/LG TO APPROVE RESOLUTION OF SUPPORT FOR PROJECT 4. Approval of Resolution appropriating funds for the 1987/88 Budget. LG/BLJ TO APPROVE APPROPRIATION RESOLUTION AYES: AHB,LG,BLJ NAYS: SAM, HCN 5. Request for Approval of Employee Classification Plan for fiscal year 1987/88. BLJ/AHB - URC 6. Approval to Request Va. Department of Transportation for Matching Funds for Burnham Road. LG/AHB TO APPROVE - URC 7. Approval of Funding Priorities for Secondary Highway Six Year Plan HCN/SAM TO ADOPT RESOLUTION ON FUNDING PRIORITIES - PUBLIC HEARING TO BE JUNE 23, 1987 - URC 8. Request for Authorization to Establish a Water System for Thousand Oaks Subdivision. HCN/BLJ - URC 9. Request for Approval to transfer Hollins Water System to Hollins Community Development Corporation. BLJ/AHB TO APPROVE - URC F. REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS NONE G. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS NONE H. APPOINTMENTS 1. Fifth Planning District Commission 2. Recreation Commission 3. Virginia Western Community College Board I. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS 2 i BRITTLE: (1) ASKED PHIL HENRY TO CHECK ON THE TIMING OF TRAFFIC LIGHTS ON ROUTE 419. (2) ASKED STAFF TO SEE IF PORTABLE JOHNS HAVE BEEN INSTALLED AT CLEARBROOK PARK FIELD. GARRETT: HAS RECEIVED SEVERAL COMPLAINTS ABOUT THE FLUORESCENT PAIN ON CURBS, ESPECIALLY DURING THE RAIN. MCGRAW: (1) ANNOUNCED HORSE CENTER BROCHURES ARE NOW READY. (2) HAS MET WITH BERNIE LANGHEIM OF CABLE TV ON GETTING CABLE TO RURAL AREAS. SOLUTION MAY BE THAT CITIZENS CAN PAY A PORTION OF THE COST TO GET CABLE. NICKENS: ANNOUNCED THAT CORTRAN TASK FORCE HAS MET AGAIN AND IS STILL INVESTIGATING POSSIBLE FUNDING SOURCES. JOHNSON: IS CONCERNED THAT RESIDENTS ARE NOT PURCHASING COUNTY DECALS. WOULD LIRE A RECIPROCAL AGREEMENT WITH OTHER VALLEY GOVERNMENTS ON REPORTING AUTOMOBILES WITHOUT DECALS. J. CONSENT AGENDA ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY. HCN/BLJ TO APPROVE - URC 1. Minutes of Meeting - April 14, 1987 2. Request to classify Eastern Bypass as a "Rural Other Principal Arterial" and add to the Federal Aid Primary System" 3. Revision of the Secondary Highway System concerning alteration of Route 711. 4. Acceptance of Water facilities serving Edinburgh Square . 5. Acceptance of Water and Sewer facilities serving Kingston Court, Section 1. 6. Approval of Special Leave Extension for Workers' Compensation Injury. K. CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS NONE 3 L. REPORTS RECEIVED AND FILED 1. Board Contingency Fund 2. Unappropriated Fund Balance 3. Income Analysis & State of Expenditures as of April 30, 1987. M. EXECUTIVE SESSION pursuant to the Code of Virginia Section 2.1-344 (a) (1) and (6) PERSONNEL AND LITIGATION - BLJ/AHB AT 4:20 P.M. - URC EVENING SESSION (7:00 P.M.) RESOLUTION OF CONGRATULATIONS TO INGERSOLL-RAND FOR WINNING THE 1986 UNITED STATES SENATE PRODUCTIVITY AWARD - JOE HANDERHAND AND STEVE GOLDFARB PRESENT TO RECEIVE - BLJ/AHB - URC REPORT ON DRAINAGE STUDY (HELD OVER FROM AFTERNOON SESSION) LG/BLJ TO APPROVE STAFF RECOMMENDATION TO USE $200,000 FROM INCREASED DECAL FEE FOR DRAINAGE, AND THAT PALM VALLEY AND KENTLAND NEIGHBORHOODS RECEIVE FIRST FUNDS, AND THAT A WORK SESSION BE SET FOR JUNE 9, 1987 ON DRAINAGE AYES: AHB,LG,HCN,SAM NAYS : SAM N. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance amending Section 12-28 of the Roanoke County Code to increase the annual license tax on motor vehicles. BLJ/LG - 2ND READING - JUNE 9, 1987 URC 2. Ordinance authorizing the Acquisition of Easements for the 1987-88 Replacement/Improvement Water Projects. HCN/SAM - 2ND READING - JUNE 9, 1987 URC 3. Ordinance to increase the Salaries of Members of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, pursuant to Section 14.1-46.01:1. AHB/HCN - 2ND READING - JUNE 9, 1987 URC 4 4. Ordinance authorizing the Vacation and Relocation of a portion of a water line easement, Ozanich Property. AHB/HCN - 2ND READING - JUNE 9, 1987 URC 5. Ordinance authorizing the County Administrator to accept the donation or dedication of Utility and Right-of -Way Road Easements and Improvements Therein. BLJ/HCN - 2ND READING - JUNE 9, 1987 URC 6. Ordinance authorizing the Purchase of a Water Storage Reservoir Site. LG/AHB - 2ND READING - JUNE 9, 1987 0. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance amending Chapter 13, "Offenses-Miscellaneous" Sections 13 and 14 of the Roanoke County Code concerning Unlawful Disposal of Waste Materials and Unlawful Accumulations of Trash and Weeds. SAM/HCN - APPROVE - URC 2. Ordinance authorizing Acquisition of Easements for Castle Rock Sewer Line. LG/HCN - APPROVE - URC 3. Ordinance authorizing Acquisition of Easement for the Brambleton Avenue Highway Project. AHB/LG - APPROVE - URC P. PUBLIC HEARINGS 587-1 Public Hearing to hear Citizen Comment on an Ordinance amending Section 12-28 of the Roanoke County Code to Increase the Annual License Tax on Motor Vehicles. NO CITIZENS PRESENT TO SPEAK ON THIS ISSUE 587-2 Petition of SPRINGWOOD ASSOCIATES to amend the conditions of a 0.606 acre parcel to allow construction of an additional retail center adjacent to 3513 Brambleton Avenue in the Windsor 5 Hills Magisterial District. (CONTINUED FROM FEBRUARY 24, 1987) LG/AHB TO APPROVE WITH PROFFERS URC 587-3 Petition of J. B. GORIA requesting rezoning from B-3 Business to B-2 Business of a tract containing 1.57 acres located on the south side of Route 419 west of Bernard Drive in the Cave Spring Magisterial District. AHB/BLJ TO APPROVE URC 587-4 Petition of JOSEPH AND SANDRA QUESENBERRY requesting rezoning from B-1 Business to B-2 Business of a tract containing 0.819 acre and located at 4347 Old Cave Spring Road in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District. LG/AHB TO APPROVE WITH PROFFERS URC Q. CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS NONE R. ADJOURNMENT AT 9:37 P.M. 6 ,~N ~ v F ~ /. L ~ ~ 1838 ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA MAY 26, 1987 Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meeting. Regular meetings are held on the second Tuesday of each month at 2:00 p.m., and on the fourth Tuesday of each month at 3:00 p.m. Public Hearings will be heard at 7:00 p.m on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.) 1. Roll Call. 2. Invocation: The Reverend Sam Crews Coopers Cove Baptist Church 3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag. B. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS C. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS D. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS AND AWARDS E. NEW BUSINESS 1. Report on Drainage (WILL BE PRESENTED AT 7:00 P.M.) - 2. Request to locate the State Forensic Science Laboratory behind Southview School. 3. Request for Approval of Pilot Recycling Project. 4. Approval of Resolution appropriating funds for the 1987/88 Budget. 5. Request for Approval of Employee Classification Plan - for fiscal year 1987/88. 6. Approval to Request Va. Department of Transportation for Matching Funds for Burnham Road. • 7. Approval of Funding Priorities for Secondary Highway Six Year Plan 8. Request for Authorization to Establish a Water System for Thousand Oaks Subdivision. 9. Request for Approval to transfer Hollins Water System to Hollins Community Development Corporation. F. REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS G. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS H. APPOINTMENTS 1. Fifth Planning District Commission 2, ecreation commission '~. Virginia Western Community College Board I. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS J. CONSENT AGENDA ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY. 1. Minutes of Meeting - April 14, 1987 2. Request to classify Eastern Bypass as a "Rural Other Principal Arterial" and add to the Federal Aid Primary System. 3. Revision of the Secondary Highway System concerning alteration of Route 711. 4. Acceptance of Water facilities serving Edinburgh Square . 5. Acceptance of Water and Sewer facilities serving Kingston Court, Section 1. 6. Approval of Special Leave Extension for Workers' Compensation Injury. 2 K. CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS L, REPORTS 1. Board Contingency Fund 2, Unappropriated Fund Balance 3, Income Analysis & State of Expenditures as of April 30, 1987. M, EXECUTIVE SESSION pursuant to the Code of Virginia Section 2.1-344 (a) EVENING SESSION (7:00 P.M.) REPORT ON DRAINAGE STUDY (HELD OVER FROM AFTERNOON SESSION) N, FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance amending Section 12-28 of the Roanoke County Code to increase the annual license tax on motor vehicles. 2, Ordinance authorizing the Acquisition of Easements for the 1987-88 Replacement/Improvement Water Projects. 3, Ordinance to increase the Salaries of Members of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, pursuant to Section 14.1-46.01:1. 4. Ordinance authorizing the Vacation and Relocation of a portion of a water line easement, Ozanich Property. 5. Ordinance authorizing the County Administrator to accept the donation or dedication of Utility and Right-of-Way Road Easements and Improvements Therein. 6. Ordinance authorizing the Purchase of a Water Storage Reservoir Site. O. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance amending Chapter 13, "Offenses-Miscellaneous" Sections 13 and 14 of the 3 .+ ~ Roanoke County Code concerning Unlawful Disposal of Waste Materials and Unlawful Accumulations of Trash and Weeds. 2. Ordinance authorizing Acquisition of Easements for Castle Rock Sewer Line. 3. Ordinance authorizing Acquisition of Easement for the Brambleton Avenue Highway Project. P. PUBLIC HEARINGS 587-1 Public Hearing to hear Citizen Comment on an Ordinance amending Section 12-28 of the Roanoke County Code to Increase the Annual License Tax on Motor Vehicles. 587-2 Petition of SPRINGWOOD ASSOCIATES to amend the conditions of a 0.606 acre parcel to allow construction of an additional retail center adjacent to 3513 Brambleton Avenue in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District. (CONTINUED FROM FEBRUARY 24, 1987) 587-3 Petition of J. B. GORIA requesting rezoning from B-3 Business to B-2 Business of a tract containing 1.57 acres located on the south side of Route 419 west of Bernard Drive in the Cave Spring Magisterial District. 587-4 Petition of JOSEPH AND SANDRA QUESENBERRY requesting rezoning from B-1 Business to B-2 Business of a tract containing 0.819 acre and located at 4347 Old Cave Spring Road in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District. Q• CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS R. ADJOURNMENT 4 OF ROANp~.~ ~ ,~ ~ _ 18 '~~ 88 SFSQUICENTENN\P~' A Beauti)u/Beginning BOARD OF SUPERVISORS BOB JOHNSON. CHAIRMAN COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT ELMER C HODGE LEE GARRETT, VICE-CHAIRMAN . WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT ALAN H. BRITTLE CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT STEVEN A. MCGRAW CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT May 28, 1987 Ms. Kelly Whitney Clean Valley Council P. O. Box 3320 Roanoke, Virginia 24015-1320 Dear Ms. Whitney: Attached is a copy of Resolution No. 52687-2 concerning Roanoke County's support for a pilot recycling project with the Clean Valley Council. This resolution was adopted by the Board of Supervisors at their meeting on May 26, 1987. If you need further information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, ~ • ~~ ~ Mary H. Allen Deputy Clerk Attachment P.O. BOX 29800 • ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 2 4018-07 9 8 <703> 772-2004 OF ROANp'rF ~ ,w ~ A 2 a ' ` V ~~~~ ~~ ,,~, i~~~~~~~ 18 ~ E~ 88 SFSCUICENTENN~P~ ABeauti~u/Beginning BOARD OF SUPERVISORS BOB JOHNSON. CHAIRMAN COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR .HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT LEE GARRETT. VICE-CHAIRMAN ELMER C. HODGE WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT May 2 8, 1 9 8 7 ALAN H. BRITTLE CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT STEVEN A. MCGRAW CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT Mr. Fred Altizer, Resident Engineer Va. Department of Transportation P. 0. Box 3071 Salem, Virginia 24153 Dear Mr. Altizer: Attached is a copy of Resolution No. 52687-8.b concerning revision of the Secondary Highway System regarding the relocation of Route 711. This resolution was adopted by the Board of Supervisors at their meeting on May 26, 1987. If you need further information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Mary H. Allen Deputy Clerk Attachment P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 (703) 772-2004 O~ POANp~,~ ~ p L 2 A 2 a~ 18 E~ 88 SFSQUICENTENN~p~ A Beauti~u/Beginning COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE May 28, 1987 C~nun~~ of ~vttnvkr Mr. Fred Altizer, Va. Department of P. 0. Box 3071 Salem, Virginia Dear Mr. Altizer; BOARD OF SUPERVISORS BOB JOHNSON. CHAIRMAN HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT LEE GARRETT, VICE-CHAIRMAN WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT ALAN H. BRITTLE CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT STEVEN A. MCGRAW CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT Resident Engineer Transportation 24153 Attached is a copy of Resolution No. 52687-6 concerning approval of the construction priorities for the Secondary System for Roanoke County for fiscal year 1987-88. This resolution was adopted by the Board of Supervisors at their meeting on May 26, 1987. If you need further information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, ~' Mary H. Allen Deputy Clerk Attachment P.O. BOX 29800 ROANGKE, VIRGINIA 2 4018-07 9 8 (703) 772-2004 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MAY 26, 1987 RESOLUTION 52687-9 OF CONGRATULATIONS TO THE ROCK DRILL DIVISION OF THE INGERSOLL-RAND COMPANY FOR WINNING THE 1986 UNITED STATES SENATE PRODUCTIVITY AWARD BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: WHEREAS, the Rock Drill Division of the Ingersoll-Rand Company is located in Roanoke County and provides employment for over 525 people in the Roanoke Valley; and WHEREAS, Ingersoll-Rand is renowned world-wide for its engineering excellence and exceptionally high quality products; and WHEREAS, in 1986 the Rock Drill Division Performance Bonus Plan was implemented in Roanoke County to create a commitment by all Rock Drill people to competitiveness, improved performance and cost reduction; and WHEREAS, this plan provides a monetary reward to employees who meet or exceed the business goals set, and gives them an opportunity to become "partners" in the business; and WHEREAS, the Rock Drill Division of Ingersoll-Rand Company has received the 1986 United States Senate Productivity Award for implementation of this plan. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County congratulates the Rock Drill Division of Ingersoll-Rand for receiving this high honor; and .. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County extends its best wishes to Joe P. Handerhand, Steve Goldfarb, and all. the employees of Ingersoll-Rand for continued success in their endeavors. On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor Brittle and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None ABSENT: None A COPY - TESTE .~ Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors 5/27/87 CC: File Resolutions of Congratulations File AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MAY 26, 1987 RESOLUTION OF CONGRATULATIONS TO THE ROCK DRILL DIVISION OF THE INGERSOLL-RAND COMPANY FOR WINNING THE 1986 UNITED STATES SENATE PRODUCTIVITY AWARD BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: WHEREAS, the Rock Drill Division of the Ingersoll-Rand Company is located in Roanoke County and provides employment for over 525 people in the Roanoke Valley; and WHEREAS, Ingersoll-Rand is renowned world-wide for its engineering excellence and exceptionally high quality products; and WHEREAS, in 1986 the Rock Drill Division Perf~rman~P Bonus Plan was implemented in Roanoke County to create a commitment by all Rock Drill people to competitiveness, improved performance and cost reduction; and WHEREAS, this plan provides a monetary reward to employees who meet or exceed the business goals set, and gives them an opportunity to become "partners" in the business; and WHEREAS, the Rock Drill Division of Ingersoll-Rand Company has received the 1986 United States Senate Productivity Award for implementation of this plan. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County congratulates the Rock Drill Division of Ingersoll-Rand for receiving this high honor; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County extends its best wishes to Joe P. Handerhand, Steve Goldfarb, and all the employees of Ingersoll-Rand for continued success in their endeavors. A-52687-10 ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 26, 1987 SUBJECT: Report on the Drainage Study COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: /Y ~~'' ./~G(ff)u'bv-~ t`;-,~ _//(.vt,v~'~t ~ ~'~`2fttivPr+t~t/ C ~2 `J SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Attached is the drainage study of the Palm Valley/Kentland neighborhoods. The study generally outlines the responsibilities for flood and drainage control, identification of some of the major issues involved, and recommends certain short term and long term solutions as follows: Short Term Solutions: 1. Adoption of the Virginia Department of Transportation Standards. 2. Adoption of the Roanoke County Construction Standards. 3. Inspection of drainage improvements during constructions. 4. Inspection of drainage facilities. 5. Amendment to the Floodplain Ordinance. All of these recommendations are highly desirable and feasible. Implementation of these standards will help prevent further drainage problems with future construction. Lona Term Solutions: On a long-term basis, the County should develop or participate in the development of regional watershed plans. It may be necessary to establish a drainage utility to help finance the cost of ongoing drainage maintenance. Under this concept, homeowners and business will be assessed a fee depending upon the amount of water runoff from their property. Funds received under this program would be used for maintenance of streams, retention ponds, and drainage basins. Palm Valley/Kentland Neighborhoods: The two areas in the County of the greatest concern at the present time are the Palm Valley and Kentland neighborhoods. Staff recommends improvements to both of these areas to help alleviate the problem of flooded basements. In the Palm Valley area, the staff recommends redesign and enlargement of the drainage flume that carries off water from the shopping centers on Williamson Road. In the Kentland area, staff recommends replacing the culvert under the highway with a larger size pipe. In both areas, extensive cleanup is required of the creeks, and it may be necessary to install storm drains as well. Staff also identified other problem areas which should be addressed after the Palm valley and Kentland areas have been corrected. As much of the work as possible should be done with County staff, and the major projects should be contracted to take advantage of the construction season. It is anticipated that much of the construction work in these two neighborhoods can be completed this summer, with cleanup of the creeks to continue throughout the winter and spring of next year. This study was prepared by Phillip Henry, John Peters, George Simpson and Lita Handy of the County Engineering Department, with assistance from other other County offices and various agencies. The staff is to be commended for the thoroughness of the report. FISCAL IMPACT: The cost of continuing the drainage program and the improvements to the Kentland/Palm Valley areas is approximately $200,000. If the Board chooses to increase the decal fees, approximately $260,000 will be generated. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the decal fees be increased, and $200,000 of the $260,000 be used to fund these improvements, and that the drainage problems in the Palm Valley and Kentland areas be addressed first. It is further recommended that a work session be held on June 9, 1987 to study the changes necessary to the County ordinances. Following the work session, the drainage standards should be adopted and the staff should proceed with first and second readings of the ordinances necessary to implement the standards. Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved (X) Motion by: LG/BLJ moved to approve No Yes Abs Denied ( ) drainage study, allocate $200 000 fro~rittle g Received ( ) increased decal fees establish Palm Garrett g Referred Vallev and Kentland as first priority Johnson g To and set work session for June 9 1987McGraw g Nickens X cc: File Phillip Henry John Peters John Hubbard Tim Gubala ITEM NUMBER / AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 26, 1987 SUBJECT: Report on Drainage Study COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: A report on the drainage study will be presented to the Board at 7:00 p.m. on Tuesday evening. Prior to that time, staff will review with the board members a draft of the report. It should be noted that this report is being heard at the evening session rather than the normal 3:00 p.m. session to permit more citizens to attend. 1 ~~ Elmer C. odge County Administrator -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Ak Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred To Brittle Garrett Johnson McGraw Nickens F ~ ~~ ~'1 t ;- ~ ~ ~ ^ DRAINAGE STUDY 1.00 BACKGROUND 1.01 Maintenance Responsibility 1.01.1 Virginia Department of Transportation 1.01.2 Roanoke County 1.01.3 Private 1.02 Ordinances, Drainage 1.02.1 Floodplain Ordinance 1.02.2 Virginia Erosion and Sediment Control Handbook 1.02.3 VDOT Drainage Manual 1.03 Plan Review 2.00 ISSUES 2.01 Urbanization 2.02 Debris 2.03 Poor Construction 2.04 Site Layout 2.05 Rainfall Intensity 3.00 SOLUTIONS 3.01 Short Term (within 1 year) 3.01.1 Standards (a) VDOT Drainage Manual (b) Roanoke County Construction Standards 3.01.2 Inspection of Drainage Facilities 3.01.3 Building Inspection Process 3.01.4 Floodplain Ordinance Revisions 3.02 Long Term (1 to 10 years) 3.02.1 County or Regional Watershed Plans 3.02.2 Drainage Program (Policy) 3.02.3 Drainage Utility 4.00 FINANCIAL ALTERNATIVES 4.01 County General Fund 4.02 VDOT Matching Funds 4.03 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) 4.03.1 Planning Grant 4.03.2 Construction Grant 4.04 Housing and Urban Development Grant (HUD) 4.05 Exoneration of Real Estate Taxes 4.06 Corps of Engineers Projects 4.07 Developer Contributions (Watershed Plan) 4.08 Drainage Utility Fee 4.08.1 Fee Based on Impervious Area 4.08.2 Fee Based on Land Use 4.09 Raise Fees 4.10 Special Assesment District 5.00 ORLANDO/PALM VALLEY/VERNDALE 5.01 Background 5.02 Issues 5.03 Solutions 6.00 KENTLAND/SOUTH PARK/WILLOWLAWN 6.01 Background 6.02 Issues 6.03 Solutions 7.00 OTHER PROBLEM AREAS 7.01 Andrew Lewis Place 7.02 Pinkard Court 7.03 Sierra/Fenwick 7.04 Nelms Lane 7.05 Castle Rock Road 7.06 Bowers and Vauxhall 7.07 Verndale Sinkholes 7.08 Merriman/Ranchcrest 7.09 Meadowlark/Tanglewood/Hummingbird 7.10 Overbill Trail 7.11 Embassy Drive 7.12 Winter Park Drive 7.13 Others, Need for Community Meetings 8.00 CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS 8.01 Conclusion 8.02 Recommendations 9.00 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT 1.01 MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITY On May 7, County staff met with Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT> residency and district level staff to clarify VDOT policy on drainage maintenance. As a result of this meeting, each party understands responsibility for drainage maintenance to consist of the following: 1.01.1 Virginia Department of Transportation VDOT, by policy, is responsible for all drainage within road rights of way, drainage easements acquired by VDOT and other drainage easements upstream and downstream of the right of way necessary to prevent inundation of the pavement. During the 1986-87 Budget year, VDOT allocated $215,000 for drainage maintenance on the secondary highway system in Roanoke County. By comparison, VDOT allocated $92,000 for Botetourt County. 1.01.2 Roanoke County In requesting VDOT to accept maintenance of roads, the Boards of Supervisors must guarantee the right of drainage easement for all concentrated stormwater leaving the right of way to a natural watercourse. As such, Roanoke County is responsible for keeping all drainage easements clear beyond VDOT's responsibility. In 1986-87, Roanoke County allocated $200,000 for drainage maintenance and improvements. 1.01.3 Private By agreement with Roanoke County, certain property owners are responsible for maintaining retention/detention facilities required by the development. In addition, the "Common Enemy" doctrine provides that private property owners are responsible for maintaining natural watercourses and surface drainage on their property and can neither increase nor decrease flow or drainage ways to the detriment of upstream or downstream properties. 1.02 ORDINANCES, DRAINAGE In reviewing site plans and subdivision proposals, the County staff only has a limited number of ordinances to use for legal authority. These ordinances include the following: 1.02.1 Floodplain Ordinance The Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance includes the Federal Emergency Management Authority (FEMA) "Model Ordinance" for regulating developments within the Federal Insurance Administration's (FIA) 100 year floodplain. Unfortunately, these regulations do not control development along streams not studied by the Army Corps of Engineers. 1.02.2 Virginia Erosion and Sediment Control Handbook Chapter 8.1 of the County Code refers to the Virginia Erosion and Sediment Control Handbook as the regulatio o control er s on and sed- mentation. In addition, the handbook provides for stormwater management in an effort to control streambank erosion. 1.02.3 VDOT Drainage Manual Even though the VDOT Drainage Manual is not referred to in the County Code, the County Engineering staff uses the Drainage Manual as a guide, but cannot enforce this drainage requirement. 1.03 PLAN REVIEW Prior to the seventies, neither the Virginia Department of Transportation nor Roanoke County had the technical staff to properly review drainage in new developments. During the early seventies, reviews were confined to drainage within the rights of way by VDOT staff. Since 1976, Roanoke County has become-more active in the drainage review process. Unfortunately, there appears to be a direct correlation between drainage problems and lack of review. 2.00 ISSUES In reviewing drainage complaints throughout Roanoke County, the current County staff has categorized the cause of drainage problems into specific groups. 2.01 Urbanization Urbanization creates larger volumes of runoff for an equivalent rainfall event. Consequently, storm sewers and channels that were once "adequate" become inadequate. Urbanization also creates more debris that can impede the proper function of drainage facilities. 2.02 Debris Anytime debris builds up around a drainage facility, there is a corresponding loss in the efficiency of the facility. For instance, flood plain projections by the United States Corps of Engineers do not include debris blockages. Therefore, storms such as the November 1985 flood are more catastrophic when bridges and other facilities are blocked by debris. 2.03 Poor Construction Much like poor plan review, Roanoke County has inherited outdated construction practices. Consequently, there are numerous instances where culverts, storm sewers, ditches, etc., are only partially functional and can cause additional flooding and/or safety problems. 2.04 Site layout The largest category of drainage problems is simply poor site layout. Poor site layout can result in inadequate foundation drainage, flooding and overtaxed sanitary sewer systems from even very moderate storms. 2.05 Rainfall Intensity In spite of all efforts at reasonable engineering under present standards, drainage problems will still occur from excessive rainfall. As a general rule, drainage facilities are designed to convey a ten (10) year recurrence storm. Consequently, a storm larger than a ten (10) year frequency will overtax most drainage facilities. Even the ten (10) year storm frequency is a higher design requirement than 10-20 years ago. 3.00 SOLUTIONS As with any report report will be based on ultimate implementation the staff. Due to the r identified the possible term. of this nature, the final judgment on the the solutions that are offered and the of the recommendations by the Board and nagnitude of the problem, we have solutions as either short term or long 3.01 Short Term (within 1 year) 3.01.1 Standards (a) VDOT Drainage Manual Rather than continuing the present practice of using the VDOT Drainage Manual as a guide, Roanoke County should adopt the VDOT Drainage Manuel by ordinance as the official drainage design manual for Roanoke County. (b) Roanoke County Construction Standards In an effort to include standards not in the VDOT Drainage Manual and the Virginia Erosion and Sediment Control Handbook, Roanoke County should prepare and adopt Drainage Design and Construction Standards. 3.01.2 Inspection of Drainage Facilities While the County staff has improved the inspection process for drainage facilities in recent years, we must place a high priority on the inspection of drainage facilities during construction. 3.01.3 Building Inspection Process Since a large number of the drainage complaints relate to poor building location and/or site grading, Roanoke County needs to revise the building permit requirements to include overlot grading plans for review and approval by County staff prior to issuance of a building permit. In addition, all grading in accordance with the approved overlot plan should be complete and approved prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. 3.01.4 Floodplain Ordinance Revisions Revise and approve the flood plain ordinance to comply with the most recent federal regulations. 3.02 Long Term (1 to 10 years) 3.02.1 County or Regional Watershed Plan Unlike the Roanoke County Utility Department, the County Engineering Department does not have an inventory of drainage facilities, much less a master plan for drainage improvements. This master plan would include any studies conducted by the Corps of Engineers. These deficiencies should be corrected. 3.02.2 Drainage Program (Policy) As the magnitude of drainage problems increases in Roanoke County, the local government will be called upon to accept more responsibility and provide more services. Roanoke County needs to establish a drainage program that addresses legal concerns, maintenance and/or construction, cost participation, priorities and other issues needed to provide a fair, responsive direction. 3.02.3 Drainage Utility Since Roanoke County has certain responsibilities concerning drainage, a permanent program with permanent funding is needed. One form of funding is the drainage utility fee which could function like the County sewer and water utility. 4.00 FINANCIAL ALTERNATIVES The following section should serve as a guide for funding alternatives: 4.01 County General Fund The Board of Supervisors could elect to appropriate General Fund money to address drainage maintenance and improvements. In 1986-87, the Board approved the use of $200,000 in general funds for drainage. 4.02 VDOT Matching Funds The Virginia State Code provides for matching funds for maintenance and construction of the Secondary Highway System. Therefore, Roanoke County could request matching funds up to $500,000 per year for drainage projects within the area of VDOT responsibility. 4.03 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) The federal government provides funds for community related improvements for those communities that consist primarily of residents in the low to moderate income bracket. 4.03.1 Planning Grant Roanoke County could qualify for $25,000 in CDBG planning grants for planning drainage related projects within communities. These projects may include relocation, floodproofing, public facilities improvements, etc. 4.03.2 Construction Grant In March 1988, Roanoke County could qualify for $322,000 for construction projects within low to moderate income communities. These projects can include relocation, floodproofing, public facilities improvements, etc. 4.04 Housing and Urban Development Grant (HUD) HUD also provides grants for improving low to moderate income communities. However, these grants are limited to $25,000 per year. 4.05 Exoneration of Real Estate Taxes The Board of Supervisors could exonerate portions of the real estate tax for those individuals within certain areas who were flooded. At the request of the homeowner, the assessor would review each case to determine the extent of the damages. Based on this review, the assessment for the year would be reduced by the value of the damage. 4.06 Corps of Engineers Projects Since the Corps of Engineers is reviewing several tributaries in Roanoke County such as Carvins Creek, Mason Creek, Tinker Creek and Glade Creek, there always exists the potential for flood control projects using between 65 and 75 percent federal funds and between 25 and 35 percent local funds. 4.07 Developer Contributions (Watershed Plan) Section 15.1-466 (j) of the State Code provides "for payment by a subdivider or developer of land of his pro rata share of the cost of providing reasonable and necessary sewerage and drainage facilities, located outside the property limits of the land owned or controlled by him but necessitated or required, at least in part, by the construction or improvement of his subdivision or development; however, no such payment shall be required until such time as the governing body or a designated department or agency thereof SHALL HAVE ESTABLISHED A GENERAL SEWER AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM for an area having related and common sewer and drainage conditions and within which the land owned or controlled by the subdivider or developer is located." 4.08 Drainage Utility Fee In the western part of United States, several states have enacted legislation that allows localities to create drainage utilities with a fee structure related to rainfall runoff. Unfortunately, the General Assembly has not specifically allowed localities in Virginia to create a drainage utility. Therefore, we would have to actively pursue enabling legislation from the General Assembly. 4.08.1 Fee Based on Impervious Area This fee would be pro-rated on the amount of impervious area on an individual parcel versus the total impervious area in the County. 4.08.2 Fee Based on Land Use This fee is the product of a basic fee rate, the area of the property, and a runoff coefficient based on land use. 4.09 Raise Fees Several of the short term solutions offered in this report require additional time and effort by the County staff. Rather than have the additional staff time paid by the General Fund, the Board could elect to raise the existing fees to cover the additional cost. 4.10 Special Assessment District The Roanoke County Charter allows the creation of Special Assessment Districts to fund improvements within a defined area. If drainage improvements benefit a group of property owners, Roanoke County could consider a Special District as a funding tool. However, such a district would require approval by a majority of the residents in a referendum. 5.00 ORLANDO/PALM VALLEY/VERNDALE 5.01 Background: The houses in this area are within the Sun Valley and Brookside Subdivisions and were constructed generally between 1961 and 1971. The majority of the houses were constructed prior to the October, 1970 Flood Plain Study by the Corps of Engineers, that was conducted at the request of the Roanoke Valley Regional Planning Commission. As a result, many houses were built without knowledge of any floodplain data. Compounding this problem is a deficient storm sewer system in the area. Flooding and associated stormwater problems are becoming more frequent as development continues to occur upstream of this area. In an attempt to define the specific types of problems the residents are having, the Engineering Department sent questionnaires to houses in the low areas adjacent to Carvin Creek and to those houses adjacent to the sinkhole between Return Road and Tampa Drive. As a result of an informal survey (56 respondents) by the Engineering Department the following information was obtained; (a) virtually all of the respondents suffered damage in the November, 1985 flood, (b) 70$ of the respondents attributed damage to the overflow from Carvin Creek, (c) 30~ attributed damage to a sinkhole or ponding water adjacent to the house, and (d) 49$ have experienced sanitary sewer back-ups. 5.02 Issues: The three basic issues contributing to the residents' flooding problems are: (1) Carvin Creek Overflowing its banks. This is a naturally occurring problem which is compounded by other factors such as; increasing runoff from development, man-made obstructions such as the bridge on Orlando Avenue and the drainage structure from Williamson Road behind 5336 Palm Valley Road, and debris that accumulates along the creek banks. (2) Sinkhole between Tampa Drive and Return Road. There is a depressed area that catches stormwater runoff and has no overland outlet, thereby creating a large ponded area that will remain stagnant for several days after a storm. The attendant odor, mosquitoes, and stagnant water pose a public nuisance. This problem is directly attributable to a lack of design and construction regulations during the developement of this area. (3> Sanitary sewer backups. These occur when the hydraulic capacity of the sewer line is exceeded due to inflow and infiltration of stormwater into lines and manholes, insufficient elevation difference between basements and sanitary sewer system, and surface water from yard and building drains entering the sewer. 5.03 Solutions: (1) There is no single definitive solution to the flooding of Garvin Creek. It is a naturally occurring process which will continue to occur. Our emphasis should be to find ways to eliminate or minimize the affects of flooding and to devote more resources to stormwater management on a regional basis. Among our immediate options to lesson the impacts of flooding are; (a> Reconstruct the drainage structure behind 5336 Palm Valley Road. This structure is the outlet for stormwater that originates as far Crossroads Mall and is carried through a storm sewer to Garvin Creek. While the amount of backwater created by this structure is not evident on the Corps study, we feel that it may have quite an adverse affect on the flow adjacent to Palm Valley Road. Our preliminary cost estimate for reconstructing the structure to make it more hydraulically efficient is $25,000. (b) Request that the Virginia Department of Highways place the bridge at Orlando Avenue (Rte. 1867) on their six year plan for improvements. The bridge, as presently constructed, creates a 2 to 3 feet backwater, or ponding effect upstream. Improving the hydraulic efficiency of the structure could potentially reduce the level of flooding in certain situations. (c) Clearing stream banks from the uppermost point of Brookside Park to the terminus of Palm Valley Road (approximately 4500') of debris, brush, and undergrowth would improve the flow characteristics of the creek. This would result in a lower depth of flow. Utilizing inmate labor on this type of project could result in substantial savings to the County. We have estimated a cost of $20,000 to have this work done. (d> Explore the possibilities of relocating houses within the floodplain and changing the use of the land to open space. There may be grants or funds available that could assist in whole or in part in relocating approximately 14 houses. (e) Continue to support the Corps of Engineers in their efforts to provide information and assistance to the County. (f) Make the expertise and assistance of the County staff available to the residents on a case-by-case basis. The staff could work with the individual homeowner to find ways to floodproof his house and property. (2) A storm sewer system should be installed to drain the area between Tampa Drive and Return Road. This would consist of two catch basins, 900 feet of pipe, 900 feet of curb and gutter, and some minor grading. The associated cost for this work would be approximately $60,000. (3> The Roanoke County Utility Department has underway a program of correcting inflow and infiltration through grouting of pipe and waterproofing manholes. There would be no appropriation required for this rehabilitation. The County could also offer the residents the assistance of the County staff in advising them on the installation of check valves, foundation drains, sump pumps, and other measures aimed at reducing sewer backup problems. 6.00 KENTLAND/SOUTH PARK/WILLOWLAWN 6.01 Background: The houses in the study area are within the Southwoods and Windsor West Subdivisions and were constructed prior to the 1970 Flood Plain Study by the Corps of Engineers and adoption of the Roanoke County Floodplain Ordinance in 1978. In addition, the study area has inadequate capacity and maintenance within the existing storm sewer system. The County Engineering Department surveyed the residents in the vicinity of the Kentland Drive and Willowlawn Road intersection as well as the residents on South Park Circle. This survey indicates that most of the residents responding have storm sewer problems, and sanitary sewer backup. In addition, several of the residents on South Park Circle complained of flooding from Mudlick Creek. 6.02 Issues: The four (4) issues contributing to the flooding problem within the study area are: 1. Mudlick Creek overflow its banks. This is a natural process compounded by increasing runoff from urbanization and debris within or along the streambank. 2. Undersized storm sewer. Several segments of the storm sewer system within the study area are undersized. As such, heavy rainfalls can cause the water to surcharge the system. 3. Debris in storm sewer. A field inspection of the drainage system throughout the 150 acre watershed indicated that several portions of the storm sewer system were totally blocked by debris. The resulting surcharge causes flooding problems at various locations. Since April 28th, vDOT and County staff have removed the debris within the storm sewer system. 4. Sanitary sewer backups These occur when the capacity of the sewer line is exceeded due to inflow and infiltration. This watershed was recently studied and upgraded by Roanoke County. Therefore, the only reasonable source of stormwater inflow is floor drains draining foundations and sanitary sewer manhole 1 ids . 6.03 Solutions: 1. While there are no simple solutions for the flooding from Mudlick Creek, we must continue to devote our efforts to regional stormwater management in the hope that we may someday reduce or control the magnitude of flooding along Mudlick Creek. Immediate options available to reduce the impact of flooding are; a> Improving the streamflow characteristics of Mudlick Creek adjacent to the study area. These improvements would include the removal of brush, debris and undergrowth. If possible, Roanoke County could reduce this cost by using inmate labor. b) Make the expertise and assistance of the County staff available to the residents. We estimate a cost of $20,000 for these activities. 2. The storm sewer system should be upgraded. a) Provide a trash rack at the beginning of the storm sewer system on Kentland Drive. In addition, upgrading the 30 inch concrete storm sewer to a 42 inch concrete storm sewer may be desired. b) Provide manholes for maintenance purposes on the 18 inch storm sewer in Kentland Drive. During installation of manholes, clear the storm sewer of any debris. Visually inspect to determine line should be abandoned or upgraded. c) Upgrade deficient manholes and inlets to present day standards. d) Grout exposed joints within the existing storm sewer. e) Upgrade the existing 24 inch under Willowlawn. f) Replace the existing 18 inch storm sewer from South Park Circle to Mudlick Creek. Staff estimates the cost of these improvements to be $68,000. 3. Debris in Storm Sewer a) Provide more inspection of drainage facilities for debris. 4. Sanitary Sewer Backup: a) County staff could offer assistance in advising the residents on the installation of check valves, foundation drains, sump pumps, and other measures aimed at reducing or preventing sewer backup problems. 7.00 OTHER PROBLEM AREAS While the drainage situation on Palm Valley and South Park are certainly serious, we are aware of other areas that also have serious drainage problems. Based on the "Rough Estimates", these projects could be programmed in future years. 7.01 Andrew Lewis Place ($100,000) This subdivision includes three (3) sinkholes that cause residential, roadway and property flooding. 7.02 Pinkard Court ($75,000) The total lack of drainage facilities in this subdivision results in residential and highway flooding. 7.03 Sierra/Fenwick Sinkhole ($70,000) A deep sinkhole on county owned property that contributes to flooding in two (2> adjacent residences. County staff has prepared plans for this project. 7.04 Nelms Lane Sinkhole ($150,000) A sinkhole near Williamson Road within the right of way of Nelms Lane that contributes to residential flooding. This project is in the present Secondary Highway Six Year Construction Plan. 7.05 Castle Rock Road ($50,000) Several property owners have filled in a natural watercourse without providing alternate drainage facilities, thereby creating three (3) manmade sinkholes. These sinkholes result in property and roadway flooding. 7.06 Bowers and Vauxhall ($50,000) The drainage channel downstream of Bowers and Vauxhall in the Windsor West Subdivision has eroded over the last 15 years from a two (2) foot deep ditch to a ten (10) foot deep ravine. This erosion has also exposed several sewer and water lines. 7.07 Verndale Sinkholes ($125,000) In the vicinity of Verndale Road and Plantation, several natural sinkholes contribute to residential and property flooding. 7.08 Merriman/Ranchcrest ($100,000) The limited capacities of the main drainage channel and culverts result in property and residential flooding. 7.09 Meadowlark/Tanglewood/Hummingbird ($50,000) The limited capacities of the drainage channels and culverts result in property and residential flooding. 7.10 Overbill Trail ($30,000) Poor overlot grading for several residential lots has contributed to residential and property flooding. 7.11 Embassy Drive ($100,000) The limited capacities in drainage channels and facilities in the Montclair Subdivision have contributed to property, residential and roadway flooding. 7.12 Winter Park Drive ($40,000) The lack of adequate capacity of the culvert under Winter Park Drive in the North Lakes Subdivision has resulted in property and roadway flooding. 7.13 Others, Need for Community Meetings Since no one has formally compiled a list of drainage problems, th e County staff need to conduct Community Meetings in order to receive citizen imput. 8.01 CONCLUSION: During the last several years, Roanoke County has progressively moved toward addressing drainage problems. These actions include the Stormwater Management Study through the Fifth Planning District Commission and funding for a drainage crew during the 1986-87 fiscal year. While we have made headway in addressing this issue, we realize that creating a drainage program requires that the County have good overall planning, policy and funding. 8.02 RECOMMENDATIONS: During the next several months, Roanoke County should take a number of positive steps toward reducing drainage problems. These steps include the following: 1. Adopt the Virginia Department of Transportation Drainage Manual. 2. Develop and approve Roanoke County Drainage Construction Standards. 3. Develop and approve a revised building and construction inspections process to insure adequate grading and drainage facilities. This revised process may require additional fees to cover the cost of additional staff. 4. Develop and adopt revised flood plain regulations to control development within and outside the Federal Insurance Administration (F.I.A.) floodplain. While these items may not address any existing problems, they will provide the County staff the tools to reduce future problems. In addition to continued regulation of future development, the Board of Supervisors needs to develop an overall drainage program. The most logical order of events consist of the following: 1. Develop a County or Regional watershed plan. 2. Pursue enabling legislation from the General Assembly to create a drainage utility. 3. Create a County or Regional drainage utility with permanent funding. While staff realizes that creating a drainage utility may take several years, Roanoke County should not lose sight of its maintenance responsibilities and the need for improvements during the interim period. These responsibilities should always be in the context of promoting the health, safety and welfare of the general public. Based on this report, staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors provide $200,000 to $1,140,000 from the general fund, decal fees, etc, to fund improvements in the Palm Valley/Orlando, Kentland/South Park/Willowlawn, and other areas of the County. In order to address these areas, Roanoke County should pursue the following: 1. Matching funds from VDOT for work within right of way. 2. Develop an inmate labor program to assist in streambank improvements. 3. Revise the Secondary Highway Six Year Plan in the fall of 1987 to include improvements to the bridge on Orlando. 4. Retain a three (3) man drainage crew to provide construction services. While a small crew is not as efficient, this crew will save the County Money and will make personnel available for maintenance. 5. Prepare a fiscal year 1987-88 work plan for Board of Supervisor's approval. 6. Provide funding to begin watershed planning. 9.00 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: The Roanoke County Engineering Department would like to acknowledge the assistance that we received during the preparation of this report: Corps of Engineers: Rex Phillips Gene Gill Virginia Tech: Dr. John Randolph Roanoke County Utilities Department: Clifford Craig Roanoke County Development Department: Sue Palmer Tim Gubala Arnold Covey Jim Lehe Roanoke City: Marie Pontius r- A P P S A. R A N C' E R E Q U E S T L PUBLIC HEARING ON f~ ~~~{/f I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so that I may comment. I agree to follow the guidelines listed below. WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE NtY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. 1. Each speaker will have between three and five minutes available whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. 2. Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. 3. All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. 4. Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times . 5. Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. 6. INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. P L E A S E W R I T E L E G I B L Y NAME: ADDRESS: PHONE: ~~/, ~~~~~ PLEASE NOTE: (After filling out, give to the Deputy Clerk. Thank you.) A P P E A R A N C'E R E Q U E S T 1 f . ~ r PUBLIC HEARING ON ,~.~'dc'~...G'_~~' ;~jr7~'„~.~~. ~~'~~%'~ ~''- ~C-. I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so that I may comment. I agree to follow the guidelines listed below. WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. 1. Each speaker will have between three and five minutes available whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. 2. Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. 3. All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. 4. Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times . 5. Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. 6. INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. P L E A S E W R I T E L E G I B L Y NAME: ADDRESS: PHONE: PLEASE NOTE: (After filling out, give to the Deputy Clerk. Thank you.) A P P E A R A N C' E PUBLIC HEARING ON R E Q U E S T I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so that I may comment. I agree to follow the guidelines listed below. WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. 1. Each speaker will have between three and five minutes available whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. 2. Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. 3. All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. 4. Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times . 5. Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. 6. INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. P L E A S E W R I T E L E G I B L Y - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NAME: ADDRESS: fdv~ ~~ PHONE : ~~ ~,Q GI ~ CP ~ S~ PLEASE NOTE: (After filling out, give to the Deputy Clerk. Thank you.) A P P E A R A N C-E R E Q U E S T - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - .~ r', PUBLIC HEARING ON ~~~z `-. ~~~~ ,~'"' ~~t~-~~' il' xC~' ~`.--' ~: I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so that I may comment. I agree to follow the guidelines listed below. WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. 1. Each speaker will have between three and five minutes available whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. 2. Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. 3. All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. 4. Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times . 5. Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. 6. INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. P L E A S E W R I T E L E G I B L Y - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NAME: ~ 1 , ADDRESS . `~ ~ ;7'~ f ~~~~' ~~;~C e' /lc~' ~~ ~ PHONE : ~ ~% ,~ - ~~~ C,~ ,~ ~' - - PLEASE NOTE: (After filling out, give to the Deputy Clerk. Thank you.) ALLOWI~`G THE INDIVIDU:-~L TO RErREB:=~i~ST `?'riEM- ~ ' ,..,... P L E A S E W R I T E L E G I B L Y NAME: !' a; ~~~: ~ r-~- i <~,~_~i ;`., ADDRESS : L_ ~~,~f ! f;r~ ~. :.~::~_ks,: `~:? PHONE . ~-- rv - PLEASE NOTE: (After filling out, give to the Deputy Clerk. Thank you.) A-52687-1 ITEM NUMBER ~ '~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 26, 1987 SUBJECT: Request to locate the State Forensic Science Laboratory behind Southview School. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR' S COMMEIVTS : ~~' s, ~, `~9 /~,~ ,. c ~ f G~ SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: J The State Department of General Services has outgrown its present Forensic Science Laboratory and needs to expand. They have expressed an interest in locating the facility on property owned by the County behind Southview School. This is part of the property being transferred to the County by the School Board with Southview School. The laboratory would be a multi-functional facility that could perform not only forensic science work, but also environmental work such as safe drinking water, S tate Water Control support, and microbiological testing. This would be an ideal location for such a facility from both the State and the the County's perspective. The close access to Interstate 81 and central location in the Roanoke Valley would be assets, particularly because of the many localities tha t use this regional facility. There is also adequate parking available for the counties, cities and towns throughout southwestern Virginia who will use the lab. The close proximity of the forensic laboratory to the Roanoke County Public Safety Building would be advantageous to the County also. Presently there are soccer fields operated by the Parks and Recreation Department located on the property the State is interested in. Any negotiations concerning donation of this property to the State would include the continued use of the property for recreational purposes until construction by the State begins. This would allow sufficient time to relocate these soccer fields. Also included would be a provision that the land would revert to the County if it was not used for a laboratory facility within five years. FISCAL IMPACT: 4~~t,, .`~„ ,,,. None at the present time. This action would only authorize preliminary negotiations with the State. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends donating 1.5 to 2.U acres of land located directly behind Southview School to the Commonwealth of Virginia for the purpose of relocating a State Forensic Science Laboratory. If the laboratory is not begun within five years, the property will revert to the County. r`~/ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator --------- ----------------------------------------- ACTION --------- -------------- VOTE Approved ( ~ Motion by: AHB/BLJ to proceed with the No Yes P Denied ( ) donation of the property to State Brittle X _ Received ( ) of Virainia for a forensic lab. Garrett ~ _ Referred Johnson ~ _ To McGraw _y~ _ Nickens X cc: File Sheriff's Department Real Estate Assessor ~;: ; _J + ~ \ awl a aiy~ DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES DIVISION OF CONSOLIDATED LABORATORY SERVICES March 17, 1987 Mr. Elmer C. Hodge, Administrator County of Roanoke 3738 Brambleton Avenue, S.W. Roanoke, VA 24018 Dear Mr. Hodge: 1 NORTH 14TH STREET RICHMOND, VIRGINIA 23219 Mr. Sigel, our Regional Director in Roanoke, has advised us that county land in the Peters Creek Road, I-581 area might be available as a prospective laboratory site. We are interested in your suggestion. We do need better facilities for our Forensic Science work. There may also be advantages to building a multi- functional facility that could perform not only Forensic Science work but also environmental work (e.g. Safe Drinking Water and Water Control Board Support) and Microbiological (Health) testing. (Benefits from the latter were dis- cussed in a Local Health Department Lab Study submitted to the General Assem- bly in November 1986). It is our understanding that Roanoke County would convey land to the state at no cost. Included would be a provision that the land would revert to the county if not used for a laboratory facility. We've consulted with our Division of Engineering and Buildings. They advise that the initial step should be a formal offer from the county. The contact for specific details is Mr. John E. Forrest, State Property and Facilities Coordinator, Division of Engineering and Buildings, 805 E. Broad Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219. His telephone number is 804-786- 3263. A proposal for a new building requires extensive preplanning and jus- tification for inclusion in the Governor's recommendations to the General Assembly. Land available at no cost would be a significant asset. DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES • DIVISION OF ENGINEERING & BUILDINGS DIVISION OF PURCHASES & SUPPLY • DIVISION OF CONSOLIDATED LABORATORY SERVICES • DIVISION OF RISK MANAGEMENT Mr. Elmer C. Hodge March 17, 1987 Page 2 We appreciate your suggestion and thank you for your interest. sw cc: W. L. Seldon J. E. Forrest P. B. Ferrara S. Sigel Sincerely yours, `~ '~°A. W. Tiedemann, Jr., Ph.D. Division Director ITEM NUMBER +~ "' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 26, 1987 SUBJECT: Request for Approval of Pilot Recycling Project COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~~ SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Clean Valley Council has requested Roanoke County's support in a pilot recycling project. Clean Valley Council has received a grant of $12,692 for partial support of the recycling project, contingent upon the written commitment of Roanoke County to participate. Bins for 1000 volunteer households would be purchased by the Clean Valley Council with this grant. The County would provide collection and disposition of the recycled materials . This program will be on a voluntary basis with 1000 residents in a chosen community who are willing to participate. Clean Valley Council will meet with communities who may be interested in participating in this project, and will coordinate an educational program with the residents of the community chosen, prior to implementation of the program. They will also manage the project, and handle complaints and program monitoring. If this concept is approved by the Board of Supervisors, the Clean Valley Committee and County staff will work out the details such as how often the materials will be collected, what community will participate, and specific measures necessary to implement the program. The cost of the collection will be provided by Roanoke County with the understanding that the cost will be offset by avoidance of landfill use fees, sale of recyclable materials and other sources. At their last meeting, the Roanoke Valley Regional Solid Waste Management Board agreed to a credit not to exceed $3,000 in Roanoke County's tipping fees to assist Roanoke County in this project. Clifford Craig, Director of Utilities, has prepared the attached resolution which states that Roanoke County will provide collection and disposition of the recycled materials. The resolution also states that the cost of collection services will be offset during the course of the project through savings from avoidance of landfill use fees and sale of recyclable materials ." collected through the project and other financial resources made available by the Clean Valley Council. The resolution approves support for this project and will allow the Clean Valley Council to begin the specific planning process. The Clean Valley Council and County staff will keep the Board informed on the specific details concerning implementation of the project. FISCAL IMPACT: ` "~ None. The cost, for collection will be offset as described above. No additional County funds would be required under the conditions of the proposed resolution. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the attached resolution be adopted and the County be authorized to work with Clean Valley Council to implement the project. SUBMIT'T'ED BY APPROVED BY: /~ ~; J ~ Cliffor ig Elmer C. Hodge Director of Utilities County Administrator ------------------------------------------------------------------ Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred To Motion by: ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs Brittle Garrett Johnson McGraw Nickens ~' in Roanoke County involving the curbside collection of recycla- bles, including public education activities, to help assess the relative costs and benefits of a recycling program and. the will- ingness of Virginia's citizens to participate; and WHEREAS, the Virginia Environmental Endowment has pledged its support and given its "Vote of Confidence" for this project in Roanoke County as offering curbside recycling as a part of the waste management program which will provide additional informa- tion on waste management to other localities throughout Virginia; and WHEREAS, the County of Roanoke desires to express by this resolution its conceptual support, for the pilot project; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia that Roanoke County confirms its support for the pilot project of the Clean Valley Council and its Valley Recycling Project Committee and offers its operational support in the imple- mentation of the one-year pilot project by providing the cost of service by the Roanoke County Refuse Collection, with the under- standing that the pilot project shall be so designed that the County may reasonably anticipate and project that the cost of collection service will be offset during the course of the pilot project through savings from avoidance of landfill use fees and sale of recyclable materials collected through the project and other financial resources made available by the Clean Valley Council. • _, . PROPOSED RESOLUTION (By Clean Valley Council) WHEREAS, providing adequate solid waste disposal has become a critical problem in the Ronoke Valley; and WHEREAS, the capability of Roanoke County to provide for solid waste management affects the quality of life of County residents and the appeal of Roanoke County to tourists and new industry; and WHEREAS, there is a growing awareness that landfills are difficult and expensive to site, operate, close, and replace and, further, that landfills present other hazards, including potential liability to the local governments in the event of ground water contamination, property damage, or harmful public health consequences; and WHEREAS, the General Assembly has recognized the need for, and the public has demonstrated interest in, identifying and prompting safe and efficient solid waste management strategies that will reduce dependence on land- fills; and WHEREAS, in other states, waste voluire reduction through recycling, source reduction, resource recovery and other methods have proven to be an important element of effective comprehensive waste management strategies by extending the life of existing landfills and reducing the nedd of future land- f ill capacity; and WHEREAS, the Clean Valley Council and its Valley Recycling Project Committee have developed a pilot project to be conducted in Roanoke County involving the curbside collection of recyclables, including public education activities, to help assess the relative costs and benefits of a recycling pro- gram and the willingness of Virginia's citizens to participate; and WHEREAS, the Virginia EnvironmQntal Endowment has pledged its support and given its "Vote of Confidence" for the curbside recycling project in Roanoke County as offering a unique and timely opportunity to initiate a waste management program which may provide a model for other localities throughout Virginia; and WHEREAS, the County of Roanoke desires to express by this resolution its support, both conceptual and financial, for the pilot project; now, therefore, be it RESOLVID by the .Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia that Roanoke County confirms its support for the pilot project of the Clean Valley Council and its Valley Recycling Project Committee and offers its financial operational support in the implementati~ of the one-year pilot project by pro- viding the cost of service by the Roanoke County Refuse Collection, with the understanding that the pilot project shall be so designed that the County may reasonably anticipate and project that the cost of collection service will be offset during the course of the pilot project through savings from avoidance of landfill use fees, sale of recyclable materials collected through the project and other sources or means, as determined by the County Administrator and the Roanoke County Department of Public Facilities. r v~ GERALD Y. M~ARTHY ExECUTIVE DIRECroR March 23, 1987 Ms. Kelly McDaniel Whitney. Executive Director Clean Valley Council P. 0. Box 3320 Roanoke Valley, Virginia 24015-1320 Dear Ms. Whitney: ntal ,~- ~~ ~ 901 E.AtiT GARY STREET Y. U. ROX 790, RICHMOND, Y'IRGINU 23206 8041644-5000 We are pleased to inform you that Virginia Environmental Endowment is prepared to offer a grant of $12,692 to Clean Valley Council for partial support of the Roanoke Valley Cubrside Recycling Project. This grant award is contingent upon the Endowment's receipt of a written commitment by Roanoke County to finance the cost of subcontractor collection fees or the cost of service by Roanoke County Refuse Collection for the one-year pilot project. It also requires that Clean Valley Council provide or raise additional funds as needed to purchase the proposed household collection bins. In addition to the written commitment of financial support from Roanoke County, please send us a copy of the Count's feasibility.. s~t__u~d~y____a__nd__cos_t_ analysis . When we have receive" these documents, we wi-=~~1 send our Terms of Grant contract for your consideration. This contract will specify that $11,000 of the grant be used to purchase household collection bins and $1,692 be used for printing, duplication and postage for educational materials and evaluation surveys. In approving this grant award, the Endowment's Board of Directors have given their "vote of confidence" for the pilot curbside recycling project in Roanoke County. Clean Valley Council has devoted a great deal of time and effort to designing the recycling project and public education activities and to encouraging cooperative support from citizens, the business community, environmental organizations, and public agencies. Roanoke County now has a unique opportunity to initiate a waste management program which, if successful, may provide a model for other localities throughout Virginia. The Environmental Defense Fund, Virginia Municipal League, and Department of Waste Management, among others, have indicated an interest to help promote it statewide. We will expect Clean Valley Council to coordinate these efforts and to offer technical assistance and information following the pilot project. D18E(.TORS: R(Tti5 P. Bl'LLARD•UIXO,ti M. BCTLER•R"II.LiAM B GI ~1MISG5•PAII. U. F.L81,15(:•~~IRGL'~IA 8. Ht)LT(11•F{F:~~RY ~'. Ma~KEN/.,IE. Jk.•~~F:ORGE l.. YOV~ELI. Ms. Kelly McDaniel Whitney Page Two March 23, 1987 ~' VEE has previously awarded grants for technical assistance in waste management to localities and for public education and discussion on the need for alternatives to landfill disposal. We believe it is time to assess the relative costs and benefits of a recycling program and the willingness of Virginia's citizens to participate. The Roanoke County pilot project is especially timely in light of the action by the 1987 General Assembly (HJR 292) to establish a joint subcommittee to study alternatives for improving -waste volume reduction and recycling efforts. The subcommittee's .~~ork is to be completed in Plovember 1887 for a report to tie 1988 -General Assembly. As part of our grant agreement with Clean Valley Council, we will expect your organization and Roanoke County to provide the subcommittee and Department of Waste Management all available information on the progress of the pilot project. We look forward to hearing from you and from Roanoke County on plans to finance-and initiate the curbside recycling project. incerely, ~Yi(, C Gerald P. McCarthy Executive Director GPM:jm AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, NiAY 26, 1987 RESOLUTION 52687-2 OF SUPPORT FOR PILOT RECYCLING PROJECT WITH CLEAN VALLEY COUNCIL WHEREAS, providing adequate solid waste disposal has become a critical problem in the Roanoke Valley; and WHEREAS, the capability of Roanoke County to provide for solid waste management affects the quality of life of County resi- dents and the appeal of Roanoke County to tourists and new indus- try; and WHEREAS, there is a growing awareness that landfills are difficult and expensive to site, operate, close, and replace and, further, that landfills present other hazards, including poten- tial liability to the local governments in the event of ground water contamination, property damage, or harmful public health consequences; and WHEREAS, the General Assembly has recognized the need for, and the public has demonstrated interest in, identifying and pro- moting safe and efficient solid waste management strategies that will reduce dependence on landfills; and WHEREAS, in other states, waste volume reduction through recycling, source reduction, resource recovery and other methods have proven to be an important element of effective comprehensive waste management strategies by extending the life of existing landfills and reducing the need of future landfill capacity; and WHEREAS, the Clean Valley Council and its Valley Recycling Project Committee have developed a pilot project to be conducted in Roanoke County involving the curbside collection of recycla- tiles, including public education activities, to help assess the relative costs and benefits of a recycling program and the will- ingness of Virginia's citizens to ,participate; and WHEREAS, the Virginia Environmental Endowment has pledged its support and given its "Vote of Confidence" for this project in Roanoke County as offering curbside recycling as a part of the waste management program which will provide additional informa- tion on waste management to other localities throughout Virginia; and WHEREAS, the County of Roanoke desires to express by this resolution its conceptual support, for the pilot project; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia that Roanoke County confirms its support for the pilot project of the Clean Valley Council and its Valley Recycling Project Committee and offers its operational support in the imple- menta tion of the one-year pilot project by providing the cost of service by the Roanoke County Refuse Collection, with the under- standing that the pilot project shall be so designed that the County may reasonably anticipate and project that the cost of collection service will be offset during the course of the pilot project through savings from avoidance of landfill use fees and sale of recyclable materials collected through the project and other financial resources made available by the Clean Valley Council. On motion of Supervisor Brittle, seconded by Supervisor Garrett and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None ABSENT: None A COPY - TESTE .~~ Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors 5/27/87 CC: File Clean Valley Council Clifford Craig, Director of Utilities John Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator ITEM NUMBER ~ l AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER IN ROANOKE, VA., ON TUESDAY, MEETING DATE: May 26, 1987 SUBJECT: Fiscal year 1987-88 Budget Appropriation Resolution COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR' S COMMENTS : ~ ~t ~ k~~~~~~~- ~• SUMMARY OF INFORMATION; Attached for your approval is the fiscal year 1987-88 Budget Appropriation Resolution. The Board of Supervisors authorized several changes to the original budget document which have been incorporated into the attached resolution. These changes are summarized as follows: • Reduction of fiscal year 1987-88 Board Contingency by $43,058 to fund salary increases for those employees at top of scale • Addition of brush collection by using $57,570 from fiscal year 1986-87 Refuse Department operating budget • Increase in school appropriation by $500,000: $350,000 from the sale of land $100,000 from budgeted beginning balance $ 50,000 from fiscal year 1987-88 Board Contingency • Elimination of Economic Development allocation in the amount of $50,000 to fund the following: $ 40,000 for the purchase of YMCA property $ 3,000 for the payment of the Blue Ridge Region Commission Dues $ 7,000 addition to Board Contingency for a total of $13,942 FISCAL IMPACT: The 1987-88 fiscal year budget will require an appropriation resolution in the amount of $131,558,500. (This includes all interfund transfers; the net budget less interfund transfers is $101,295,880.) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends adoption of the 1987-88 Budget Appropria- tion Resolution as presented. SUBMITTED BY: ~.. Reta R. Busher Director of Management and Budget ------------------------------------------------------------------ ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred To APPROVED: ~i%~ Elmer C. Ho ge County Administrator Brittle Garrett Johnson McGraw Nickens AT A REGULAR NESTING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF kUANOKE COUNTY,VA. HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CF.NTEK IN kUANOKE, VA., ON TUES., NAY 26, 1987 RESOLUTION N0. Be It resolved by the Board of Supervisors of the County if Roanoke, Virginia, that the folloNing appopriations are hereby jade frog the respective funds for the period ending June 30, 1988, for the functions and purposes indicated: PERSONNEL ------------ OPERATING ------------ CAPITAL TRANSFERS ------------ ------------- TOTAL ------------ EXPENllITURES: GENERAL FUND BOARD. OF SUPERVISORS 86,660 60,335 250 147,245 CO ADMINISTRATOR ADMINISTRATION 122,693 14,100 600 137,343 COUNTY BOARD SERVICES INFORMATION & REFERRAL 18,030 13,185 31,215 PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION 190,407 29,472 169,879 EMPLOYEE RELA?IONS 25,914 25,914 TRAINING 1,775 1,775 COUNTY ATTORNEY 125,898 32,620 (32,0951 126,423 ELECTIONS kEGISTRATION 82,260 29,788 112,048 ELECTIONS 44,326 15,275 59,601 TREASURER 235,921 150,524 43,997 430,942 COMMONNEALTN'S ATTORNEY OPERATIONS 259,14? 16,400 275,547 VICTIM/WITNESS PROGRAM 2,500 7,500 10,000 COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE ADMINISTRATION 77,100 1,5%5 78,675 REAL ESTATE 62,671 12,529 75,200 PERSONAL PROPERTY 134,331 70,65H 204,989 BUSiNt55 LICENSE 65,250 14,2}'7 79,9'7 CLEkI u~ 9'!iE C1kCUiT CUUk1' }'UBL1C hi;CORUS 25'7,936 65,0~i. ?rye. ;f73,71',S i^i~kOrli,M 3-',9~U 35, 'ay 42 '73,740 P~~~LiCING ~ INVE5T1GA1'1Ni; AUMIHISTRATIUH 140,589 38,700 179,289 CIVIL DIVISION 536,131 53,150 589,281 UNIFORM DIVISION 1,217,895 235,788 166,060 1,639,743 DETECTIVE DIVISION 677,131 93,ti29 2,459 773,219 SERVICES DIVISION 565,211 88,025 653,236 TRANSPORTAION SAFETY COMMISSION 960 960 CARE/CONFINEMENT OF PRISONERS 1,493,529 319,929 1,81`1,958 CIRCUIT COURT 6,425 93,214 99,639 GENERAL DISTRICT COURT 150 24,910 25,060 MAGISTRATE 730 239 969 J & D RELATIONS COURT 6,516 6,516 PROBATION :39,175 39,175 EXPENDITURES: ASST CO AUMIN MGT SVCS COUNTY ASSESSOR ADMINISTRATION REASSESSMENT . BOARD OF EQUALIZATION FINANCE CENTRAL ACCOUNTING PAYROLL MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET PROCUREMENT SERVICES FIRE ADMINISTRATION FIRE SUPPRESSION FIRE PREVENTION TRAINING TECHNICAL SERVICES PLANNING AND RESEARCH RESCUE SQUAD OPERATIONS EMS SERVICES EMERGENCY SERVICES PLANNING & OPERATIONS HAZARDWS MATERIALS ANIMAL. CONTROL ASST CO ADMIN PUBLIC FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ROADfiAY PROJECT MANAGEMENT STREET LIGHTING REFUSE COLLECTION OPERATIONS SESQUICENTENNIAL ENGINEERING ENGI NF.ER 1 NG DRAFTING & RECORDS CONSTkUCT10N INSPECTION ROAUf~AY BUILDINGS & GRUUN!S MANAGEME:N'^ 6UtLDiNG MA(N'iENANCh GRUUNG:, MAINTENANCE LEAF COLLECTION PARKS ~ RECREATION CUMMUNIi'Y EDUCATION LEISURE ACTIVITIES UUTDOOk ADVENTURE SENIOR CITI"LENS SPECIAL EVENTS THERAPEUTICS ADULT ATHLETICS YOUTH ATHLETICS ADMINISTRATION PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION PEkSUNNEL OPEkATING CAPITAL TkAN:~FEkS 1'01'AL 61,819 177,670 298,412 10,913 196,265 48,564 68,039 161,785 63,192 710,047 80,523 28,725 53,005 31,504 179,727 21,487 97,868 97,404 856,269 30,148 189,322 70,820 99,968 39,896 123,822 403, 8'12 340,190 53,599 85,135 24,733 66,868 52,241 95,973 54,?27 146,768 191,283 18,813 36,812 44,082 92,039 14,320 11,955 39,536 37,575 244,080 5,000 36,410 104,650 2,455 143,538 8,525 3,320 5,500 43,355 27,745 101,566 430,454 75,000 20,985 8,064 11,254 4,895 ] ~, x!39 49:?, 608 ~i,845 40,000 30U 500 1,908 2,250 2,350 13,114 3,301 10,000 226,272 4,551 31,200 277 370 218,500 13,600 11,395 1,206 59,260 275 200 3,900 cl?,141) 90,000 1h8,280) 5,700 t?6,052) 7,800 t5?.,4941 18,325 80,631 219,033 373,694 10,913 288,304 63,161 80,364 201,321 100,767 1,172,627 99,123 76,530 158,861 33,959 202,798 188,527 25,007 9,400 141,223 108,008 101,566 1,376,718 105,148 122,027 48,532 66,578 44,791 136,261 897,680 428,035 40,000 53,699 65,635 26,641 69,118 54,591 109,087 58,028 156,768 435,880 0 PERSONNEL OPERATING CAPITAI, TRANSFERS TUTAL EXPENDITURES: PUBLIC HEALTH 387,016 "387,016 SOCIAL SEVICES ADMINISTRATION 1,459,796 254,945 13,804 1,728,545 PUBLIC AS5I5STANCE 826,406 826,406 INSTITUTIONAL CARE 48,000 48,000 SOCIAL SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS 94,984 99,984 HUNAN RESOURCE COlNlI?TEE 20,000 20,000 ASST CO ADNIN DEVELOPMENT 82,515 25,042 10'1,557 PLANNING 6 20NING ADNIN fi COMMUNITY SERVICES 83,233 18,436 101,669 LAND USE & ZONING 89,696 3,600 93,296 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 32,394 2,500 34,894 ZONING ORDINANCE 8,900 30,000 ~ 38,900. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 30,878 61,375 92,253 DEVELOPMENT REVIE(i PERMITS 59,082 2,085 61,167 DEVELOPMENT REVIEfi COORDINATOR 41,998 1,400 43,398 PLANNING COMMISSION 15,560 2,700 18,260 CONSTRUCTION BUILDING SERVICES ADMINISTRATION 36,385 7,550 43,935 INSPECTIONS 135,142 21,203 156,345 PARK DEVELOPMENT 45,948 3,332 49,280 LIBRARY ADMINISTRATION 97,336 35,892 133,2'18 RESEARCH & CIRCULATION 605,858 260,542 4,135 870,535 GENERAL MAINTENANCE ?1,200 71,200 EXTENSION & CONTINUING EDUCATION 81,623 5,1'10 8,500 95,293 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 664,349 664,349 INSURANCE 808,380 808,380 DRAINAGE PROGRAM 0 MISCELLANEOUS 540,675 540,675 TRANS TO DEBT SEV1CE-GENERAL 2,777,160 2,777,160 TRANS TO DEBT SEVICE-SCHOOL 938,665 938,665 TRANSFER TO CAPITAL 290,110 290,110 TRANSFER TO SCHOOLS 25,466,000 25,466,000 TkANSFEk TO YOUTH HAVEN II 72,239 72,239 TRANSFER TO INTERNAL SERVICE 246,321 246,321 TRANSFER TO UTILITY CAPITAL FUND 40,000 40,000 CON i 14i;F.NT BALANCE 13, 942 13, 942 53,258,528 DEBT FUND GENERAL FUND OBLIGATIONS 3,203,874 3,203,879 SCHOOL FUND OBLIGATIONS 1,027,'144 1,027,244 REVENUE SHARING FUND 150,000 150,000 YOUTH HAVEN II FUND 218,905 80,690 299,595 PERSONNEL OPEkATING CAPITAL TRANSFERS TOTAL EXPENDITURES: INTERNAL SEkVICE FUND DATA PROCESSING ADMINISTRATION OPERATIONS DEVELOPMENT VEHICLE POOL COMMUNICATIONS CAPITAL FUND UTILITY CAPITAL FUND UTILITY FUND UTILITY BILLING COLLECTIONS METER READING UTILITY NAINT ~ OPERATIONS ADMINISTRATION YATER OPERATIONS YATER SYSTEM MAINTENANCE SEYER OPERATIONS SEWER MAINTENANCE SSE/R NON-DEPARTMENTAL-YATER NON-UEPARTMENTAL-SEYER FEE (.LASSES RECREATION FUND COMMUNITY EDUCATION LEISU!tE ACTIVITIES OUTDOOR ADVENTURE SENIOR CITIZENS SPECIAL EVENTS TNEP,APEUTICS AllUL'f ATHLETICS YOU`T'H ATHLETICS ADMINISTRATION GARAGE FUND SCHOOL OPERATING FUND SCHOOL BUS FUND SCHOOL CAFETERIA FUND SCHOOL FEDERAL PROGRAMS FUND REGIONAL SPECIAL EDUCATION FUND SCHOOL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND SCHOOL LITERARY LOAN FUND SCHOOL TEX?BOOK FUND 91,878 9,470 1,688 103,036 91,264 103,546 12,500 12,116 219,426 219,421 7,850 590 227,811 17,350 10,500 27,850 18'1,165 87,636 43,554 313,355 290,110 290,110 40,000 40,000 85,305 90,511 6,625 182,441 49,693 9,510 9,500 68,703 191,789 39,285 7,500 188,574 272,212 1,438,761 1,710,973 245,784 291,716 102,155 639,655 100,061 960,326 1,060,387 194,257 129,692 130,000 453,949 165,835 315,120 70,250 551,205 1,088,527 ~ 113,006 1,201,533 834,082 113,006 947,088 32,554 7,000 1,000 40,554 24,537 17,543 4,000 4b,080 964 17,387 1,000 ?9,351 6,429 18,727 2,000 27,156 1,072 6,600 1,400 9,0'l2 3,215 3,285 1,000 7,500 27,'l27 13,445 1,Oi!0 9 ,E?~ 1,060 S,hhU 2,411 4,ti89 ~ivU "i,~.~i! 238,000 53,684,319 150,OuU 2,731,UUU 1,041,15ti 648,68U 1,941,000 9,348,060 411,003 131,558,500 REVENUES; GENEkAL FUND 53,258,52fti DEBT FUND 4,231,118 REVENUE SHAkING FUNll 150,000 YOUTH HAVEN II FUND 299,595 INTERNAL SEkVICE FUND 891,4%8 CAPITAL FUNll 290,110 UTILITY FUND 7,044,508 FEE CLASSES - RECREATION FUND 199,945 GARAGE FUND 238,000 SCHOOL OPERATING FUND 53,684,319 SCHOOL BUS FUND 150,000 SCHOOL CAFETERIA FUND 2,731,000 SCHOOL FEDERAL PROGRAMS FUND 1,041,156 REGIONAL SPECIAL EDUCA?ION FUND 648,680' SCHOOL CAPITAL INPROVENENTS FUND 1,941,000 SCHOOL LITERARY LOAN FUND 4,348,060 SCHOOL TEXTBOOK FUND 911,003 131,558,500 Be it further resolved: That the County Adrinistrator ray authorize the transfer of any unencurbered balance or portion thereof Eton one classification of expenditure to another rithin the sate departtent or agency. That the County Adrinistrator ray transfer up to $10,000 fror the unencurbered balance of the appropriation of one departrent or agency to another departrent or agency, including the contigency account encotpassed in the Non-Departrental appropriation. That all funded outstanding encurbrances, both operating and capital, at June 30,1987 are reappropriated to the 1987-88 fiscal year to the sere departrent and account for rhich they are encutbered in the previous year. That appropriations designated for capital projects rill not lapse at the end of the fiscal year but shall retain appropriated until the completion of the project or until the $aard of Supervisors, by appropriate resolution, changes or elirinates the appropriation. Upon completion of a capital project, staff is authorized to close out the project and transfer to the fuadinq source any retaining balances. This section applies to appropriations for Capital Projects at June 30,1987 and appropriations in the 1987-88 budget. ITEM NUMBER ~ ' '~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD A'r THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER IN ROANOKE, VA., ON TUESDAY, MEETING DATE: May 26, 1987 SUBJECT: Fiscal Year 1987-88 Budget Appropriation Resolution rnrrNmY AnMTNTSTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Due to the significant number of personnel changes necessary to complete the revised budget, the Appropriation Resolution is not available in the agenda packet. However, all changes will be discussed with the Board prior to the meeting, and the actual Appropriation Resolution document will be distributed at the meeting. FISCAL IMPACT: None RECOMMENDATION: None SUBMITTED BY: ~~ ~ . ~.~~ Reta R. Busher Director of Management and Budget APPROVED: Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ------------------------------------------------------------------ ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Brittle Received ( ) Garrett Referred Johnson To McGraw Nickens _ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OP ROANOKE COUNTY,VA. NELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER IN ROAHOKE, VA., OM TUES., MAY 26, 1987 RESOLUTION N0. 5 2 6 8 7- 3 Be It resolved by the Board of Supervisors of the County if Roanoke, Virqinia, that the folloring appopriations are hereby jade frog the respective funds for the period ending June 30, 1988, for the functions and purposes indicated: EXPENllITURES: GENERAL FUND BOARD OF SUPERVISORS CO ADMINISTRATOR ADMINISTRATION COUNTY BOARD SERVICES INFORMATION & REFERRAL PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION EMPLOYEE RELATIONS TRAINING COUNTY ATTORNEY ELECTIONS REGISTRATION ELECTIONS TREASURER COMMONNEALTH'S ATTORNEY OPERATIONS VICTIM/VIITNESS PROGRAM COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE ADMINISTRATION REAL ESTATE PERSONAL PROPERTY BUSINESS LICENSE CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT PUBLIC RECORDS MICROFILM POLICING & INVESTIGATING ADMINISTRATIUN CIVIL OIYISION UNIFORM DIVISION DETECTIVE DIVISION SERVICES DIVISION TRANSPORTAION SAFETY COMMISSION CARE/CONFINEMENT OF PRISONERS CIRCUIT COURT GENERAL DISTRICT COURT MAGISTRATE J ~ D RELATIONS COURT PROBATION PERSONNEL OPERATING CAPITAL TRANSFERS TOTAL 86,660 60,335 250 122,643 14,100 600 18,030 13,185 140,407 29,472 25,914 1,775 125,898 32;620 82,260 29,788 44,326 15,275 235,921 150,524 259,147 16,400 2, sou 7, soo 77,100 1,575 62,671 12,529 134,331 70,658 65,250 14,247 287,936 85,031 746 37,950 35,'369 421 140,589 38,700 536,131 53,150 1,217,895 235,788 186,060 677,131 93,ti29 2,459 565,211 88,025 960 1,493,529 319,429 6,425 93,214 150 24,910 730 239 6,516 39,175 (32,0951 43,997 147,245 137,343 31,215 169,879 25,914 1,775 126,423 112,048 59,601 430,942 275,547 10,000 78,b75 75,200 204,989 79,497 373,713 73,740 179,189 589,281 1,639,743 773,219 653,236 960 1,812,958 99,639 25,060 969 6,516 39,175 PERSONNEL OPERATING CAPITAL TRANSFERS TOTAL ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ EXPENDITURES: ASST CO AllMIN NGT SVCS COUNTY ASSESSOR ADMINISTRATION REASSESSMENT BOARD OF EQUALIZATION FINANCE CENTRAL ACCOUNTING PAYROLL MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET PROCUREMENT SERVICES FIRE ADMINISTRATION FIRE SUPPRESSION FIRE PREVENTION TRAINING TECHNICAL SERVICES PLANNING AND RESEARCH RESCUE SQUAD OPERATIONS ENS SERVICES EMERGENCY SERVICES PLANNING & OPERATIONS HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ANIMAL CONTROL ASST CO ADMIN PUBLIC FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ROADWAY PROJECT MANAGEMENT STREET LIGHTING REFUSE COLLECTION OPERATIONS SESQUICENTENNIAL ENGINEERING ENGINEERING DRAFTING & RECORDS CONS?RUCTION INSPECTION ROADWAY BUILDIRGS & GROUNDS MANAGEMENT BUILDING MA[NTENANCE GROUNDS MAINTENANCE LEAF COLLECTION PARKS & RECREATION COMMUNITY EDUCATION LEISURE ACTIVITIES OUTDOOR AUVEN?URE SENIOR CITI'lEHS SPECIAL EVENTS THERAPEUTICS ADULT ATHLETICS YOUTH ATHLETICS ADMINISTRATION PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION 61,819 177,670 298,412 10,913 196,265 48,564 68,039 161,785 63,192 710,047 80,523 28,725 53,005 31,504 179,727 21,487 97,868 97,404 856,264 30,148 189,322 70,820 99,968 39,896 123,822 403,872 340,190 53,599 85,135 24,733 66,868 52,241 95,973 54,727 146,768 191,283 18,813 36,812 44,082 92,039 14,320 11,955 39,536 37,575 244,080 5,000 36,410 104,650 2,455 143,538 8,525 3,320 5,500 43,355 27,745 101,566 430,454 75,000 20,985 8,064 11,254 4,895 12,439 493,BOd 87,845 40, ouo 300 500 1,908 2,250 2,350 13,114 3,301 10,000 226,272 4,551 31,200 277 370 218,500 13,600 11,395 1,206 59,260 275 200 3,900 (17,141) 90,000 (88,280) 5,700 (36,052? 7,800 (52,444) 18,325 80,631 219,033 373,694 10,913 288,304 63,161 80,364 201,321 100,767 1,172,627 99,123 76,530 158,861 33,959 202,798 186,527 25,007 9,400 141,223 108,008 101,566 ],376,718 105,248 122,02? 48,532 6b,578 44,791 136,261 89'1, 68U 428,035 4o,ouo 53,594 BS,b35 2b,641 69,118 54,591 109,087 58,028 156,768 435,880 0 rrrc~unncL urbxAT1N~ CAPITAL TRANSFERS TOTAL E%PFNDITURES: PUBLIC HEALTH 387,016 387,016 SOCIAL SEVICES ADMINISTRATION 1,459,796 254,945 13,804 1,728,545 PUBLIC ASSISSTANCE 826,406 826,406 INSTITUTIONAL CARE 48,000 48,000 SOCIAL SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS 94,984 99,984 HUNAN RESOURCE COMMITTEE 20,000 20,000 ASST CO ADNIN DEVELOPMENT 82,515 25,042 107,557 PLANNING & ZONING ADMIN 6 COMMUNITY SERVICES 83,233 18,436 101,669 LAND USE & ZONING 89,696 3,600 93,296 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 32,394 2,500 34,894 ZONING ORDINANCE 8,900 30,000 38,900 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 30,878 61,375 92,253 DEVELOPMENT REYIEY PERMITS 59,082 2,085 61,167 DEVELOPMENT REYIEH COORDINATOR 41,998 1,400 43,398 PLANNING COMMISSION 15,560 2,700 18,260 CONSTRUCTION BUILDING SERVICES ADMINISTRATION 36,385 7,550 43,935 INSPECTIONS 135,142 21,203 156,345 PARK DEVELOPMENT 95,948 3,332 49,280 LIBRARY ADMINISTRATION 97,336 35,892 133,228 RESEARCH & CIRCULATION 605,858 260,542 4,135 870,535 GENERAL MAINTENANCE 71,200 71,200 EXTENSION & CONTINUING EDUCATION 81,623 5,170 8,500 95,293 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 664,349 664,349 INSURANCE 808,380 $08,380 DRAINAGE PROGRAM O MISCELLANEOUS 540,675 540,675 ?BANS TO DEBT SEYICE-GENERAL 2,777,160 2,777,160 TRANS TO DEBT SEVICE-SCHOOL 938,ti65 938,665 TRANSFER TO CAPITAL 290,110 290,110 TRANSFER TO SCHOOLS 25,466,000 25,466,000 TRANSFER TO YOUTH HAVEN II 72,239 72,239 TRANSFER TO INTERNAL SERVICE 246,321 246,321 TRANSFER TO UTILITY CAPITAL FUND 40,000 40,000 CONTINGENT BALANCE 13,942 13,942 53,258,528 DEBT FUND GENERAL FUND OBLIGATIONS 3,203,874 3,203,879 SCHOOL FUND OBLIGATIONS 1,027,244 1,027,244 REVENUE SHARING FUND 150,000 150,000 YOUTH HAVEN II FUND 218,905 80,690 299,595 PEP.SOIiNEL ------------ OPERATING ------------ CAPITAL ------------ TRANSFERS ------------ TOTAL ------------ EXPENDITURES: INTERNAL SERVICE FUND DATA PROCESSING ADMINISTRATION 91,878 9,470 1,688 103,036 OPERATIONS 91,264 103,546 12,500 12,116 219,426 DEVELOPMENY 219,421 7,850 540 227,811 VEHICLE POOL 17,350 10,500 27,850 COMMUNICATIONS 182,165 87,636 43,554 313,355 CAPITAL FUND 290,110 290,110 UTILITY CAPITAL FUND 40,000 40,000 UTILITY FUND UTILITY BILLING COLLECTIONS 85,305 90,511 6,625 182,441 METER READING 49,693 9,510 9,500 68,703 UTILITY MAINT & OPERATIONS ADMINISTRATION 141,789 39,285 7,500 188,574 WATER OPERATIONS 272,212 1,438,761 1,710,973 DATER SYSTEM MAINTENANCE 245,784 291,716 102,155 639,655 SEWER OPERATIONS 100,061 960,326 1,060,387 SEWER MAINTENANCE 194,257 129,692 130,000 453,949 SSE/R 165,835 315,120 70,250 551,205 MON-DEPARTMENTAL-WATER 1,088,527 113,006 1,201,533 NON-DEPARTMENTAL-SEWER 834,082 113,006 947,088 FEE CLASSES RECREATION FUND COMMUNITY EDUCATION 32,554 7,000 1,000 40,554 LEISURE ACTIV[TIES 24,537 17,543 4,000 46,080 OUTDOOR ADYENTURE 964 17,387 1,000 19,351 SENIOR CITIZENS 6,429 16,727 2,000 27,156 SPECIAL EVENTS 1,072 6,600 1,400 9,072 THERAPEUTICS 3,215 3,285 1,000 7,500 ADULT ATHLETICS 27,227 13,445 1,000 41,672 YOUTH ATI{LET{CS 1,060 1,Oti0 ADMINISTRATION 2,411 4,689 400 7,500 GARAGE FUND 238,000 SCHOOL OPERATING FUND 53,684,319 SCHOOL BUS FUND 150,000 SCflOUL CAFETERIA FUND 2,731,000 SCy00L FEDERAL PROGRAMS FUND 1,041,156 REGIONAL SPECIAL EDUCATION FUND 648,680 SCHOOL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND 1,941,000 SCHOOL LITERARY LOAN FUND 4,348,060 SCHOOL TEXTBOOK FUND 411,003 131,558,500 • REVENUES; GENERAL FUND 53,258,528 DEBT FUND 4,231,118 REVENUE SNARING FUND 150,000 YOUTH HAVEN II-FUND 299,595 INTERNAL SERVICE FUND 891,478 CAPI?AL FUND 290,110 UTILITY FUND 7,044,508 FEE CLASSES -RECREATION FUND - 199,945 GARAGE FUND 238,000 SCHOOL OPERATING FUND ~ 53,684,319 SCHOOL-BUS FUND 150,000 SCHOOL CAFETERIA FUND 2,731,000- . SCHOOL FEDERAL PROGRAMS FUND 1,041,156 REGIONAL SPECIAL EDUCATION FUND 648,680 SCHOOL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND 1,941,000 SCHOOL LITERARY LOAN FUND 4,348,060 SCHOOL TEXTBOOK FUND 411,003 131,558,500 Be it further resolved: That the County Administrator may authorize the transfer of any unencumbered balance or portion thereof from one classification of expenditure to another rithin the same department or agency. That the County Administrator may transfer up to 810,000 from the unencumbered balance of the appropriation of one department or agency to another department or agency, including the contigency account encompassed in the Non-Departmental appropriation. That all funded outstanding encumbrances, both operating and capital, at June 30,198'l are reappropriated to the 1987-88 fiscal year to the same department and account for rhich they are encumbered in the previous year. That appropriations designated for capital projects rill not lapse at the end of the fiscal year but shall remain appropriated until the completion of the project or until the Baard of Supervisors, by appropriate resolution, changes or eliminates the appropriation. Upon completion of a capital project, staff is authorized to close out the project and transfer to the funding source any remaining balances. ?his section applies to appropriations for Capital Projects at June 30,1987 and appropriations in the 1987-88 budget. On motion of Supervisor Garrett, seconded by Supervisor Johnson, and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, Johnson NAYS: Supervisors McGraw, Nickens ABSENT: None T~ - Q Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk 5/27/87 CC: File Reta Busher, Director of the Budget Diane Hyatt, Director of Finance John Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator John Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator Tim Gubala, Assistant County Administrator A-52687-5 ITEM NUMBER ~_S AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER. MEETING DATE: May 26, 1987 SUBJECT: Approval of Classification Plan for FY 1987-88. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: V s, ~z~~' ~ 'Gj~/ ~ (.~.cL ~~ ~~ SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Classification Plan for County employees for fiscal year 1987-88 is submitted for your approval. The Classification Plan consists of classified and unclassified positions incorporated in the County budget approved for fiscal year 1987-88. The salaries of members of the Board of Supervisors are determined by ordinance of the Board. The salaries of the County Administrator, County Attorney, along with any salary supplements approved for constitutional officers, are also determined by the Board. The salaries for other County employees, both classified and unclassified, are determined by the County Administrator within the limits of the adopted Classification Plan and appropriated funds. The salary structure for classified personnel consists of eight steps (A through H) with 5 percent increments between each step. The salaries for unclassified personnel other than the County Administrator, County Attorney, and salary supplements for constitutional officers are determined by the County Administrator. The unclassified category of personnel generally includes those employees in positions of assistant county administrator and department head. Funds for 5 percent salary increases are included in the approved County budget. In the approval of the Classification Plan for fiscal year 1987-88, the Board of Supervisors reaffirms the authority of the County Administrator to determine salaries and to approve personnel actions for all classified and unclassified employees with the exception of salaries of Board of Supervisors' members, the County Attorney, the County Administrator, and any salary supplements approved for constitutional officers. FISCAL IMPACT: ~~~ ~~ '°-~~ The cost of funding the 1987-88 Classification Plan is incorporated in the budget previously approved by the Board of Supervisors. RECOMMENDATIONS: It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors approve the Classification Plan for fiscal year 1987-88 and reaffirm the authority of the Board of Supervisors and County Administrator to determine salaries and otherwise implement the Classification Plan for the fiscal year 1987-88. SUBMITTED BY: %~ D . K .-'Cook Director of Human Resources APPROVED: L~!~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator RESOLUTION: YES NO ACTION Approved (X) Motion By: BLJ/AHB to approve Brittle Denied ( ) classification p an or 987-88 Garrett Received ( ) Johnson Referred ( ) McGraw To Nickens cc: File Keith Cook John Hubbard John Chambliss Tim Gubala County Attorney VOTE No Yes Abs X ~_ _~. Classification Plan and Unclassified Salary Schedule for employees in the service of Roanoke County for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 1987, as herein set forth in the following words and figures: CLASSIFICATION PLAN July 1, 1987 PART I - CLASSIFIED POSITIONS (MADE 7 A B C D E F G H 10,609 11,140 11,697 12,281 12,896 13,540 14,217 14,928 Code Title ~Pt• NO. ~. 503 Laborer Parks & Recreation 11 Refuse Collection 1 504 Refuse Collector Refuse Collection 26 (~.2ADE 8 A B C D E F G H 11,140 11,697 12,281 12,896 13,540 14,217 14,928 15,675 Code Title ~Pt• NO. ~. 102 Clerk Typist Library 3 Fire & Rescue 1 Engineering 1 Utilities 1 139 Storekeeper Procurement 1 140 Courier Procurerent 1 210 Tax Clerk I Commissioner of Revenue 3 213 Real Estate Clerk I Commissioner of Revenue 1 Real Estate Assessment 6 221 Treasurer Clerk I Treasurer 2 225 Account Clerk I Utility Billing 1 500 Custodian Building Maintenance 3 505 Utilities Maintenance Worker Utility Maintenance 5 510 Grounds Maintenance Worker Parks & Recreation 6 GRADE 9 A B C D E F G H 11,697 12,281 12,896 13,540 14,217 14,928 15,675 16,459 Code Title Dept• ~. ~• 800 Cook Sheriff/Jail 1 1 -~ GRADE 10 A 12,281 Code 200 401 417 499 506 509 701 702 A 12,896 Code 105 B C D 12,896 13,540 14,217 Title Data Entry Operator Pollution Abatement Inspector's Aide Meter Reader Custodian II Motor Equipment Operator I Meter Replacement Worker Library Assistant Technical Services Assistant B 13,540 Title Secretary C D 14,217 14,928 110 Assistant Registrar 113 Business Ordinance Inspector 138 Purchasing Clerk 211 Tax Clerk II 214 Real Estate Clerk II 222 Treasurer Clerk II 226 Account Clerk II 300 Permits Clerk 803 Civil Pra:ess Clerk II 804 Corrections Records Clerk 912 Deputy Circuit Court Clerk I E F G 14,928 15,675 16,459 DePt• Sheriff/Policing & Investigation Utility Maintenance Utility Billing Building Maintenance Utility Maintenance Refuse Collection Parks & Recreation Utility Maintenance Library Library E F G 15,675 16,459 17,282 Dept• General Services Development Utility Maintenance Emergency Services Engineering Parks & Recreation Human Resources Sheriff/Policing & Investigation Sheriff/Jail Youth Haven II Finance/Mgmt & Budget County Administrator Registrar Commissioner of Revenue Procurement Commissioner of Revenue Catmissioner of Revenue Treasurer Parks & Recreation Accounting Utility Billing Library Utility Maintenance Development Review Sheriff/Policing & Investigation Sheriff/Jail Clerk of Court H 17,282 No. Ems. 1 3 3 1 6 14 3 1 15 2 H 18,146 No. Emp. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 3 1 5 1 4 2 1 1 2 2 1 i 2 `.~.~+ GRADE 12 A B C D E F G H 13,540 14,217 14,928 15,675 16,459 17,282 18,146 19,053 Code Title ~Pt• NO. ~. 405 Engineering Aide Engineering 2 507 Motor Equipment Operator II Utility Maintenance 6 Parks & Recreation 2 609 Building Maintenance Person Building Maintenance 2 711 Recreation Leader Parks & Recreation 10 801 Food Services Director Sheriff/Jail 1 GRADE 13 A 14,217 Code 201 208 418 422 440 508 612 B C D 14,928 15,675 16,459 Title Senior Data Entry Coordinator Computer Operator Water Operator IV Waste Water Treatment Plant Operator III Utility Line Location Technician Equipment Mechanic ComTUnications Mechanic E F G 17,282 18,146 19,053 Dept• Data Processing Data Processing Utility Maintenance Utility Maintenance Utility Maintenance Parks & Recreation Communications Maintenance H 20,006 No. Emp. 1 2 7 2 1 1 1 GRADE 14 A 14,928 Code 106 B C D 15,675 16,459 17,282 Title Administrative Secretary E F G 18,146 19,053 20,006 Dept• Public Facilities Sheriff/Policing & Investigation Development Commissioner of Revenue Commissioner of Revenue Commissioner of Revenue Real Estate Assessment Treasurer Accounting Development Engineering H 21,006 No. Emp. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 114 212 215 223 227 308 406 Business License Inspector Tax Clerk III Real Estate Clerk III Treasurer Clerk III Account Clerk III Development Review Technician Engineering Technician 3 E -.~' 421 805 831 835 909 913 984 GRADE 15 A 15,675 Code 108 604 GRADE 16 A 16,459 Code 107 120 122 216 228 234 304 402 403 415 419 425 427 610 713 832 838 848 983 Wastewater Maintenance Mc>chanic Corrections Records Clerk Supervisor Communications Dispatcher Assistant Animal Control Officer. Deputy Clerk/Recorder Deputy Circuit Court Clerk II Group Home Night Counselor B C D 16,459 17,282 18,146 Title Legal Secretary Fire & Emg. Services Mechanic B C D 17,282 18,146 19,053 Title Executive Secretary Contract Supervisor Personnel Assistant Associate Appraiser Payroll Supervisor Utility Billing Supervisor Cross Connection Inspector Pollution Abatement Inspector Construction Inspector Refuse Collection Foreman Water Operations Foreman Utilities Maintenance Foreman Electrician Maintenance Foreman I Recreation Supervisor Lead Dispatcher Fire Fighter Victim/Witness Coordinator Group Home Counselor I 4 Utility Maintenance Sheriff/Jail Sheriff/Comn~nicatians Animal Control Clerk of Circuit Court Clerk of Circuit Court Youth Haven II E F G 19,053 20,006 21,006 Dept• County Attorney Caaronwealth's Attorney Fire & Rescue E F G 20,006 21,006 22,056 Dept• County Administrator Procurement Human Resources Real Estate Assessment Accounting Utility Billing Construction & Building Services Utility Maintenance Engineering Refuse Collection Utility Maintenance Utility Maintenance Utility Maintenance Building Maintenance Parks & Recreation Parks & Recreation Sheri f f/Camn.inicat ions Fire & Rescue Commonwealth's Attorney Youth Haven II 1 1 14 3 1 1 1 H 22,056 No. Emp. 1 2 1 H 23,159 No. Emp. 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 3 3 2 3 1 2 8 4 22 1 3 GRADE 17 A 17,282 Code 613 GRADE 18 A 18,146 Code 109 115 117 305 306 404 416 420 424 426 611 809 811 813 820 821 833 862 982 B C ~ E F G H 18,146 19,053 20,006 21,006 22,056 23,159 24,317 Title Dept• N°-' Fn Comn.xnications Technician I Caiminications Maintenance 3 B C ~ 19,053 20,006 21,006 Title Deputy Clerk to Board of Supervisors Business License Auditor Buyer Building Inspector Electrical Inspector Chief Construction Inspector Refuse Collection Supervisor Water Operations Supervisor Waste Water Operations Supervisor Utilities Maintenance Supervisor Maintenance Foreman II Corrections Officer Corrections Transportation Officer Corrections Recreation Supervisor Court Bailiff Deputy Sheriff Chief Coatninications Dispatcher Paramedic/Firefighter Group Home Counselor II E F G 22,056 23,159 24,317 Dept• County Administrator Cannissioner of Revera~e Procurement Construction & Building Services Construction & Building Services Engineering Refuse Collection Utility Maintenance Utility Maintenance Utility Maintenance Parks & Recreation Building Maintenance Sheriff/Jail Sheriff/Jail Sheriff/Jail Sheriff/Policing & Investigation Sheriff/Policing & Investigation Sheriff/Conminications Fire & Rescue Youth Haven II H 25,533 No. EcRp. 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 31 1 1 10 34 1 6 1 GRADE 19 A 19,053 Code 316 319 320 B C ~ 20,006 21,006 22,056 Title Associate Planner Com;runity Specialist Community Development Coordinator E F G 23,159 24,317 25,533 Dept• Planning/Zoning Planning/Zoning Planning/Zoning (2~yr Grant) H 26,810 No. Emp. 1 1 1 5 ~". 321 Zoning Enforcement Officer Planning/Zoning 1 614 Comrunications Technician II Camunications Maintenance 1 704 Librarian Library 1 812 Corrections Librarian Sheriff/Jail 1 814 Classification Officer Sheriff/Jail 1 822 Youth & Family Services Officer Sheriff/Policing & Investigation 6 823 Detective Sheriff/Policing & Investigation 11 826 Deputy Sheriff Corporal Sheriff/Policing & Livestigation 4 836 Animal Control Officer Animal Control 1 837 Fire Inspector Fire & Rescue 1 840 Fire Lieutenant Fire & Rescue 5 852 Corrections Corporal Sheriff/Jail 4 GRADE 20 A B C D E F G H 20,006 21,006 22,056 23,159 24,317 25,533 26,810 28,150 Code Title ~Pt• NO. ~. 202 Prograamer Data Processing 3 217 Appraiser Real Estate Assessment 8 705 Children's Services Librarian Library 1 706 Reference Librarian Library 1 707 Technical Services Librarian Library 1 708 Head Librarian Library 4 714 Recreation Program Coordinator Parks & Recreation 2 806 Rehabilitation Counselor Sheriff/Jail 2 810 Corrections Paramedic Sheriff/Jail 4 815 Classification Officer Supervisor Sheriff/Jail 1 843 Assistant Fire Marshall Fire & Rescue 1 GRADE 21 A B C D E F G H 21,006 22,056 23,159 24,317 25,533 26,810 28,150 29,558 Code Title ~Pt• NO• ~• 807 Corrections Training Officer Sheriff/Jail 1 6 L.~ '~" A 22,056 Code 121 128 203 603 808 824 825 834 839 841 842 845 853 860 981 B C D 23,159 24,317 25,533 Title Personnel Analyst Sesquicentennial F~cecutive Director Computer Operations Supervisor Technical Services Officer Corrections Sergeant Deputy Sheriff Sergeant Personnel Training Sergeant Chief Circuit Court Bailiff Fire & Emg. Svs. Training Off. Fire Marshal Fire Captain Fire & Rescue Planning Officer Crime Prevention Officer Emergency Medical Services Supervisor Group Hc~a~ Counselor III E F G 26,810 28,150 29,558 Dept• Human Resources County Administrator Data Processing Fire S Rescue Sheriff/Jail Sheriff/Policing & Ilcrvestigation Sheriff/Policing & Investigation Sheriff/Jail Fire & Rescue Fire & Rescue Fire & Rescue Fire & Rescue Sheriff/Policing & Inrvestigation Fire & Rescue Youth Haven II H 31,036 No. Emp. 1 1 1 1 4 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 C~P,DE 23 A 23,159 Code 205 318 428 B C D 24,317 25,533 26,810 Title Programrer Analyst Economic Development Specialist Utilities Coordinator E F G 28,150 29,558 31,036 Dept• Data Processing Development Utility Maintenance . H 32,587 No. Emp. 3 1 1 GRADE 24 A 24,317 Code 124 219 229 312 408 431 B C D E F G 25,533 26,810 28,150 29,558 31,036 32,587 Title Dept• Assistant County Attorney County Attorney Assistant Director of Real Estate Assessment Real Estate Assesscrent Financial Analyst Management & Budget Planner Planning/Zoning Civil Engineer I Engineering Asst. Director of Buildings & Grounds Buildings & Grounds 7 H 34,217 No. Emp. 2 1 1 2 1 1 816 Chief Medical Officer Sheriff/Jail 817 Assistant Chief Corrections Officer Sheriff/Jail (Lt.) 827 Deputy Sheriff - Lieutenant Sheriff/Policing & Inrvestigation GRADE 25 1 1 3 A B C D E F G H 25,533 26,810 28,150 29,558 31,036 32,587 34,217 35,928 Code Title ~pt• NO. ~. 206 Lead Progra~mier Analyst Data Processing 1 230 Chief Accountant Accounting 1 GRADE 26 A B C ll E F G H 26,810 28,150 29,558 31,036 32,587 34,217 35,928 37,724 Code Title ~Pt• NO. ~. 204 Systems Analyst Data Processing 1 409 Civil Engineer II Engineering 2 615 Coaminications Director CoRnunications Maintenance 1 GRADE 27 A B C D E F G H 28,150 29,558 31,036 32,587 34,217 35,928 37,724 39,610 Code Title ~Pt• ~• ~• 818 Chief Corrections Officer Sheriff/Jail 1 (Captain) 828 Deputy Sheriff - Captain Sheriff/Policing & Investigation 3 GRADE 28 A B C D E F G H 29,558 31,036 32,587 34,217 35,928 37,724 39,610 41,591 Code Title ~pt• NO. ~. 412 Assistant Director of Engineering Engineering 1 439 Assistant Utilities Director Utilities 1 8 °- . GRADE 29 A B C D E F G H 31,036 32,587 34,217 35,928 37,724 39,610 41,591 43,671 Code Title DePt• N-°' F~'- 430 Ass. Director of General Services General Services 1 GRADE 30 A g C D E F G H 32,587 34,217 35,928 37,724 39,610 41,591 43,671 45,854 Code Title ~Pt• NO. ~. 715 Asst. Director of Parks & Recreation Parks & Recreation 1 GRADE 31 A g C D E F G H 34,217 35,928 37,724 39,610 41,591 43,671 45,854 48,147 Code Title ~Pt• NO. ~. GRADE 32 A B C D E F G H 35,928 37,724 39,610 41,591 43,671 45,854 48,147 50,554 Code Title ~pt• NO' Fes' GRADE 33 A g C D E F G H 37,724 39,610 41,591 43,671 45,854 48,147 50,554 53,082 Code Title ~Pt• NO. ~. 9 r...~ - ~....~J PART II - UNCLASSIFIID POSITIONS Code Title rh~ber 952 Board Chairman 1 951 Board Vice Chairman 1 950 Board Members 3 135 Commissioner of the Revenue 1 240 Treasurer 1 830 Sheriff 1 850 Camironwealth's Attorney 1 905 Clerk of the Circuit Court 1 130 County Administrator 1 125 County Attorney 1 116 Chief Deputy Commissioner of the Revenue 1 119 Director of Procurement 1 123 Director of Human Resources 1 207 Director of Data Processing 1 22p Director of Real Estate Assessment 1 224 Chief Deputy Treasurer 1 231 Director of Finance 1 233 Asst. Co. Adm. of Management Services 1 235 Director of Management and Budget 1 310 Chief Building Official 1 313 Director of Planning 1 315 Director of Development Review 1 317 Asst. Co. Adm. of Community Development 1 411 Director of Engineering 1 429 Utilities Director 1 432 Asst. Co. Adm. of Public Facilities 1 433 Director of General Services 1 709 Library Director 1 720 Director of Parks and Recreation 1 829 Chief Deputy Sheriff 1 844 Chief of Fire & Rescue 1 846 Assistant Com~ronwealth's Attorney 2 847 Chief Asst. Comimnwealth's Attorney 1 900 Registrar 1 906 Chief Deputy Clerk of Circuit Court 1 908 Deputy Clerk of Circuit Court 8 980 Group Home Program Manager 1 10 1997 99 CUUNI Y Vh ROA NIKE SALARY SCNEDULE ~-~- ~J STEPS BASED ON HOURLY BA515 E 1 8 Y E• T ANNVH Y RATE t090 DIhE RATE EOVALS ANNVAL ROUNDED OUT TO NEAREST CEN OVRL S T E P S _. -_. A -- e -~---C'-- --------- D '------- E F ~ H GRA DE 31 7917 8313.14 8728.72 9165.10 9623.33 10104.43 10609.66 11140.06 34 928 01 A . 78 659 692.76 727.39 763.76 801.94 842.04 884.14 . 3550 5 FI . 8064 3 3.9967 4.1965 4.4063 4.6266 4.8579 S.100B . H . 14 9717 8728.72 9165.10 9623.33 10104.47 10609.66 11140.06 11697.09 76 974 02 A , 692.76 727.39 763.76 801.94 842.04 884.14 928.34 3558 5 . 5.6236 n 9967 3 4.1965 4.4063 4.6266 4.8579 5.1008 . H . 10 !165 9623.73 10104.43 10609.66 11140.06 11677.09 12281.78 03 A 8728.72 . T6 T63 94 801 842.04 884.14 928.34 974.76 1023.50 n 727.39 . 4063 . 6266 4 4.8579 5.1008 5.3558 5.6236 5.9048 H 4.1965 4. . 10 9165 9627.]3 10104.43 10609.66 11140.06 11697.09 12281.98 12896.00 67 4 04 A . 94 801 842.04 804.14 928.34 974.76 1023.50 . 107 M 763.76 . 6266 4 8579 4 5.1008 5.3558 5.6236 5.9048 6.2000 H 4.4063 . . 33 9623 10104.43 10609.66 11140.06 11677.09 12281.98 12896.00 13540.80 40 1128 05 A . 94 801 842.04 884.14 928.34 974.76 1023.50 1074.67 . 5100 6 M . 6266 4 8579 4 5.1008 5.3558 5.6236 5.9048 6.2000 . H . . 43 10104 10609.66 11140.06 11697.09 12281.98 12896.00 13540.80 14217.84 92 84 06 A . 14 884 928.34 974.76 1023.50 1074.67 1128.40 11 . N 842.04 . 3358 5 6236 5 5.7048 6.1000 6.5100 6.8355 H 4.8377 5.1008 . . 66 10609 11140.06 11677.09 12281.98 12876.00 13540.80 14217.84 82 14928.78 07 1244 07 A . 14 884 928.34 974.76 1023.50 1074.67 1128.40 1184. . 1773 7 n . 1008 5 5.3558 5.6236 5.9048 6.2000 6.5100 6.8355 . H . 06 11140 11697.09 12281.98 12896.00 13540.80 14217.84 14928.78 15675.30 28 1306 08 A . 34 928 974.76 1023.50 f07a.67 1128.40 1184.82 1244.07 . 5362 7 M . 3558 5 5.6236 5.9048 6.2000 6.5100 6.8355 7.1773 . H . 09 11697 12281.98 12896.00 13540.H0 14217.84 14928.79 15675.30 16459.04 59 1371 09 A . 974.76 1023.50 1074.67 1128.40 1184.82 1244.07 1306.28 5362 7 . 9130 7 n 6236 5 5.9048 6.2000 6.5100 6.8355 7.1777 . . H . 98 12281 12896.00 13540.80 14217.84 14928.78 15675.30 16459.04 17282.10 16 1440 10 A . 50 1023 1074.67 1128.40 1184.82 1244.07 1306.28 1371.59 . 3087 8 p . 9048 5 2000 6 6.5100 6.8355 7.1773 7.5362 7.9130 . H . . 00 80 13540 14217.Ba 14928.78 15675.30 16459.04 17282.10 18146.13 11 A 12896. . 40 1128 1184.82 1244.07 1306.28 1371.59 1440.18 1512.18 M 1074.67 . 100 8355 6 7.1773 7.5362 7.9130 8.3087 8.7241 M 6.2000 6.5 . 1907-90 COUNTY OF HU~NOHE y°^' fir` SALARY SCHEDULE Y"' "" ,,,,„J STEPS BASED ON HOURLY BASIS ANNUAL RATE DIVI HOURLY RATE DED 87 12 TIME 2080 EQUALS MO EQUALS AN NTHLY RATE, ROUNOE NUAL RATE, ROUNDE D OUT TO D OUT TO NEAREST NEAREST CENT. CENT. S T E P S CRADE A 8 ~ D E F H 12 A M N 13540.80 1128.40 6.5100 14217.84 1184.82 6.8355 14928.78 1244.07 7.1773 15675.30 1306.28 7.5362 16459.04 1371.59 7.9130 17282.10 14x0.18 0.3087 18146.13 1512.18 8.7241 19053.42 1587.79 9.1603 13 A M N 14217.84 1184.82 6.8355 14928.78 1244.07 7.1773 15675.30 1306.28 7.5362 16459.04 1371.59 7.9130 17282.10 1440.18 8.3087 18146.13 1512.18 8.7241 19053.42 1587.79 9.1603 20006.06 1667.17 9.6183 14 A M N 14928.78 1244.07 7.1773 15675.30 1306.26 7.5362 16459.04 1371.59 7.9130 17282.10 1440.18 8.3087 18146.13 1512.18 8.7241 19053.42 1587.79 9.1603 20006.06 1667.17 9.6183 21006.34 1750.53 10.0992 15 A ~ M N 15675.30 1306.28 7.5362 16459.04 1371.59 7.9130 17282.10 1440.18 8.3087 18146.13 1512.18 8.7241 19053.42 1587.79 9.1603 20006.06 1667.17 9.6183 21006.34 1750.53 10.0992 22056.74 1836.06 10.6042 16 A M H 16459.04 1371.59 7.9130 17282.10 1440.18 8.3087 18146.13 1512.18 8.7241 19053.42 1587.79 9.1603 20006.06 1667.17 9.6183 21006.34 1750.53 10.0992 22056.74 1838.06 10.6042 23159.55 1929.96 11.1344 17 A M N 17282.10 1440.18 8.3087 18146.13 1512.18 8.7241 19053.42 1587.79 9.1603 20006.06 1667.17 9.6183 21006.34 1750.53 10.0992 22056.74 1838.06 10.6042 23159.55 1929.96 11.1344 24317.49 2026.46 11.6911 lg A M N 18146.13 1512.18 8.7241 19053.42 1587.79 9.1603 20006.06 1667.17 9.6183 21006.34 1750.53 10.0992 22056.74 1838.06 10.6042 23159.55 1929.96 11.1344 24317.49 2026.46 11.6911 25533.46 2127.79 12.2757 ly A M N 19053.42 1587.79 9.1603 20006.06 1667.17 9.6183 21006.34 1750.53 10.0992 22056.74 1838.06 10.6042 23159.55 1929.96 11.1344 24317.x9 2026.x6 11.6911 25533.46 2127.79 12.2757 26810.16 2234.18 12.8895 20 q M N 20006.06 1667.17 9.6183 21006.34 1750.53 10.0992 22056.74 1838.06 10.6042 23159.55 1929.96 11.1344 24317.49 2026.46 11.6911 25533.46 2127.79 12.2757 26810.16 2234.18 12.8895 28150.72 2345.89 13.5740 21 A M N 21006.34 1750.53 10.0992 22056.74 1838.06 10.6042 23159.55 1929.96 11.1344 24317.49 2026.46 11.6911 25533.46 2127.79 12.2757 26810.16 2234.18 12.8895 28150.72 2345.89 13.5340 29558.26 2463.19 14.2107 22 A M N 22056.74 1838.06 10.6042 23159.55 1929.96 11.1344 24317.49 2026.46 11.6911 25533.46 2127.79 12.2757 26810.16 2234.18 12.8895 28150.72 2345.89 13.5340 29558.26 2463.19 14.2107 31036.10 2586.34 14.9212 CUVNIT VF ROANpY,F 1987-99 SALARY SCHEDULE ~~~-'^`'' STEPS BASED ON MOVRLY BA515 ANNUAL RATE DfVI DEO BY I2 EOUALS MONTHLY RAT E, ROUNDED OVT TO NEAREST CENT. HOVRLY RATE TIFIE 2090 EOVALS ANNVAL RATE , ROUNDED OUT TO NEAREST CENT S T E P S GRA DE A B C D E F C H 23 A 23159.55 24317.49 25533.46 26810.16 28150.72 29558.26 31036.10 32587.98 ry 1929.96 2026.46 2127.79 2234.18 2345.89 2463.19 2586.34 2715.67 H 11.1344 11.6911 12.2757 12.8895 13.5340 14.2107 14.9212 15.6673 24 A 24317.49 25533.46 26810.16 28150.72 29558.26 31036.10 32587.98 34217.46 ry 2026.46 2127.79 2234.18 2345.89 2463.19 2586.34 2715.67 2851.46 H 11.6911 12.2757 12.8895 13.5340 14.2107 14.9212 15.6673 16.4507 25 A 25533.46 26810.16 28150.72 29558.26 31036.10 32587.98 34217.46 35928.26 79 2127 2234 18 2345.89 2463.19 2586.34 2715.67 2851.46 2994.02 n H . 12.2757 . 12.8895 13.5340 14.2107 14.9212 15.6673 16.4507 17.2732 26 A ~ 26810.16 28150.72 29558.26 31036.10 32587.98 74217.46 35928.26 37724.75 h 2234.18 2345.89 2463.19 2586.34 2715.67 2851.46 2994.02 3143.73 H 12.8895 13.5340 14.2107 14.92L2 15.6673 16.4507 17.2732 18.1369 ' 27 A 28150.72 29558.26 31036.10 32587.98 34217.46 35928.26 37724.75 39610.90 ' n 2345.89 2463.19 2586.34 2715.67 2851.46 2994.02 3143.73 3300.91 H 13.5340 14.2107 14.9212 15.6673 16.4507 17.2732 18.1369 19.0437 28 A 29558.26 31036.10 32587.98 ]4217.46 35928.26 37724.75 39610.90 41591.47 h 2463.19 2586.34 2715.67 2851.46 2994.02 3143.73 3300.91 3465.96 H 14.2107 14.9212 15.6673 16.4507 17.PT32 18.1369 19.0437 19.9959 29 A 31036.10 32587.98 34217.46 35928.26 37724.75 39610.90 41591.47 43671.06 n 2586.34 2715.67 2851.46 2994.02 3143.73 3300.91 7465.96 3639.26 H 14.9212 15.6673 16.4507 17.2732 18.1369 19.0437 19.9959 20.9957 30 A 32587 98 34217.46 35928.26 37724.75 39610.90 41591.47 43671.06 45854.64 . 67 2715 2851 46 2994.02 3143.73 3300.91 3465.96 3639.26 3821.22 n . 6673 15 . 4507 16 2732 17 18.1369 19.0437 19.9959 20.9957 22.0455 H . . . 31 A 46 34217 35928.26 37724.75 39610.90 41591.47 43671.06 45854.64 48147.12 . 46 2851 2994 02 3143.73 3300.91 3465.96 3639.26 3821.22 4012.29 n . 4507 16 . 17 2732 1369 18 19.0437 19.9959 20.9957 22.0455 23.1478 H . . . 32 A 35928.26 37724.75 39610.90 41591.47 43671.06 45854.64 48147.42 50554.82 n 2994.02 3143.73 3300.91 3465.96 3639.26 3821.22 4012.29 4212.90 H 17.2732 18.1369 19.0437 19.9959 20.9957 22.0455 23.1478 24.3052 33 A 37724.75 39610.90 41591.47 47671.06 45854.64 48147.42 50554.82 53082.64 h 3143.73 3300.91 3465.96 3639.26 3821.22 4012.29 4212.90 4423.55 H 18.1369 19.0437 19.9959 20.9957 22.0455 23.1478 24.3052 25.5205 1987-BB COUNiY OF ROnNOKF SALARY SCHEDULE ~ „ ST EPS BASED ON NOURIY BASIS ANNV I E 8 D Y EI NEAREST CENT. RATE MOVRLY 2080 T IME EOVALS AN RATE NVAL ROVNDED OVT TO S T E P S '---- ---- -'-'-- 8 --------- C ----'---- D -----E- -- --'--F-'- -'---G- H GRADE A 90 39610 41591.47 43671.06 45854.64 48147.42 50554.82 53082.64 55 3 55776.72 73 4644 34 A . 3300.91 3465.96 3639.26 3821.22 4012.29 4212.90 . 442 5205 25 . 26.7965 n 0437 19 19.9959 20.9957 22.0455 23.1478 24.3052 . H . 47 41591 43671.06 45854.64 48147.42 50554.82 53082.64 55776.72 58523.50 96 4876 35 A . 3465.96 3639.26 3821.22 4012.29 4212.90 4423.55 5 4644.73 7965 26 . 28.1363 FI 9959 19 20.9957 22.0455 23.1478 24.3052 25.520 . _ H . 06 671 64 45854 48147.42 50554.82 53082.64 55736.72 58523.50 61449.65 80 5120 36 A . 43 26 3639 . 22 3821 4012.29 4212.90 4423.55 4644.73 4876.96 . 5431 29 M . 9957 20 _ 22.0455 23.1478 24.3052 25.5205 26.7965 28.1363 . H . 64 45854 48147.42 50554.82 53082.64 55736.72 58523.50. 61449.65 80 64522.22 85 5376 37 A . 3821.22 4012.29 4212.90 4423.55 4644.73 4876.96 3 5120. 5431 29 . 31.0203 n 0455 1478 23 24.3052 25.5205 26.7965 28.136 . H 22. . 48147.42 50554.82 53082.64 55736.72 58523.50 61449.65 64522.22 85 5376 67748.30 5645.69 38 A 4012.29 4212.90 4423.55 4644.73 4876.96 5120.80 . 0203 31 32.5713 M 1478 3052 24 25.5205 26.7965 28.1363 29.5431 . H 23. . . 82 0554 64 53082 55736.72 58523.50 61449.65 64522.22 67748.30 71135.79 98 5927 39 A . 5 4212.90 . 4423.55 4644.73 4876.96 5120.80 5376.85 3 5645.69 5713 32 . 34.1999 N 3052 24 25.5205 26.7965 28.1363 29.5431 31.020 . H . 53082.64 55736.72 58523.50 61449.65 64522.22 67718.30 9 71135.79 98 5927 74692.59 6224.38 40 q tt 4423.55 4644.73 4876.96 5120.80 5376.85 5645.6 5713 32 . 1499 34 35.9099 5205 5 7965 26 28.1363 29.5431 31.0203 . . N . 2 . 72 55736 58523.50 61449.65 64522.22 67748.30 71135.79 74692.59 38 4 78427.23 60 6535 41 A . 4644.73 4876.96 5120.80 5376.85 5645.69 5927.98 . 622 9099 35 . 37.7054 M 7965 26 1363 28 29.5431 31.0203 32.5713 34.1999 . H . . 50 65 61449 64522.22 67748.30 71135.79 74692.59 78427.23 82348.66 39 62 42 q 58523. 96 4876 . 5120.80 5376.85 5645.69 5927.98 6224.38 6535.60 . 68 5907 39 N . 1363 8 5431 29 31.0203 32.5713 34.1499 35.9099 37.7054 . H . 2 . 65 61449 64522.22 67748.30 71135.79 74692.59 78427.23 82348.66 86466.02 50 7205 43 q . 5120.80 5376.85 5645.69 5927.98 6224.38 6535.60 4 6862.39 5907 39 . 41.5702 M 5431 9 0203 31 32.5713 34.1999 35.9099 37.705 . N . 2 . 22 64522 30 67748 71135.79 74692.59 78427.23 82348.66 86466.02 90789.30 78 7565 44 A N . 5376.85 . 5645.69 5927.98 6224.38 6535.60 4 6862.39 5907 39 7205.50 5702 41 . 43.6487 0203 31 5713 32 34.1999 35.9099 37.705 . . N . . A-52687-5 ITEM NUMBER C_ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 26, 1987 SUBJECT: VDOT Matching Fund Request for Burnham Road Pavement Improvement COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENT/S: :/~,~r~6:~i ~~,C',~'~~11'L~~ ~~/ SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Code of Virginia provrade oramaintaineroads lnuthe matching funds from VDOT to upg Secondary Highway System. Rather than waiting for four (4) to five (5) years to have their road improved through the Secondary Highway Construction Program, the residents of Burnham Road (Route 1596) have expressed a desire to pay $5,642.00 to match VDOT Funds and have their road upgraded from surface treatment to plant mix. n '` FISCAL IMPACT: pia 7 None RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the radedBurnham Road f~ om surface allocation of $5,642.00 to upg treatment to plant mix. SUBMITTED APPROVED: ~z~ ~.._ ~,/ J hn A. Peters, III, P. E. Elmer C. odg ssistant Director of County Administrator ngineering 1 - LLB' Approved (X) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs Brittle X Garrett ~- Johnson X McGraw X Nickens X Motion by: T G/AHB o a~ r~. cve }°~~ recommend i_c~n cc: File John Hubbard John Peters Phil Henry ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 26, 1987 SUBJECT: Funding Priorities, Secondary Highway Six Year Plan NTY ADMINISTRATOR' S COMMENTS : v,C~Gtcu,t~- COU ~,.,~ ~~ ~ .~.f,-p.n.s--'%~4~ ~,C,L~ ~ _ ,,,• a-~ ~'` SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: As a requirement of VDOT Policy, the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors must prioritize funding allocation to each project within the Six Year Construction Plan. Attached for the Board's Review is a copy of the recommended priority list. As you will note, the additional funds created by the General Assembly during the 1986 Special Session will certainly expedite many projects throughout Roanoke County. This has to be submitted to the Highway Department by June 1, 1987. ~''Z~ FISCAL IMPACT:` No County funds are involved. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board approve the attached Priority List Resolution. SUBMITTED hn A. Peters, III, P. E. sistant Director of gineering APPROVED: ~~~ ~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator Approved Denied Received Referred to Motion by: ACTION VOTE Brittle Garrett Johnson McGraw Nickens No Yes Abs E-7 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MAY 26, 1987 RESOLUTION NO. APPROVING CONSTRUCTION PRIORITIES FOR THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY SYSTEM FOR ROANOKE COUNTY FOR FISCAL YEAR 1987-88 BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. The Board does hereby establish for fiscal year 1987-88 those certain construction fund priorities for the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System of Highways in Roanoke County as set out on that certain list of priorities with recommended amendments as presented to the Board at its meeting on May 26, 1987; and 2. 'T'hat a copy of this resolution duly attested be forthwith forwarded to the Virginia Department of Transportation Salem Residency office along with a duly attested copy of said priority list with amendments by the Clerk to the Board. ~Y~ ~~ N a~ ~~ oa~~ a a ., 0 oN ~ a F W f` m rn ~~~ - H r 1 a a '-' a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ u ~ N ~ ~ ~ O ,~ O td •L7 O +~ Q1 O .ty O .b O •b .-I ~ ~ co ~ m E '~ O d a ~ ~ ~ p 8 ~ w r-I . ~ 3-i ~ ~ z 0 88 $ 88 0 U ~ •° U 0 0$ 0 ~ r~ir ~ O r~ir ~ U ~ ~ I ~ I I I G ~'. L Q I U U O N O N O C l ~ OD ~ 4 •rl O O W 3.i i r~-I ~ O~ ~ ~ ~ ~ •b C ua ~ p cC d1 N c 0 c nb I ~ ~ ~ 00 u ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a l 1 X r .{l- O a ~ W cd N •U u U b ~ ~j m~ LL ~ v a av ~' a ~~ w •~-I 3 L ~n N i as p., cn i [- •~x a a ~ o ~ ~ O s ~ U f.4 U p+ '~'I N E °'I N ~ O N ~y I N I a ~ ~ ~ ~ °u ~ `° 0 ~ ~ g I .-~ N M ~ ~ W C ~ a °~`~ a a G °` ~ rn ro ~ ~, ~ a~ ~ ~ ~o O ~ T-" CY ~ ~ ,~ ~ M 6 ~ ~} CC r -i 6 ~ 7 'C! ~ E M n S O 8 O O i.j M ~ ~ ~ M ag w C ~y E CFA ~ O U U -~ E y C w ~ ~ ~ o u w c~'i 'b o ~ ~~ w ~ ^ ~ ° ~ v a C u A 7 7 n ~~ O N y °° 3 u `o ~ G o~ °''d ~ ~ ~ o 0 0 lC 1 ~ V y O -I ~ W ~ 1 I- Q ~ ~ b W GG44 u a zcn 6 n : a x ~ a S ',.~ o z o ~ ~: ~ ~ p ~ N ~n PC u'~ M ~ N N O ~ O 1 I W ~ .-i N N ~ '"i O p ~ p ~ ~ N N N ~p o O . p ~ ~ ~ ~ M a~ ~~ oa~~ a M Qp Q W aF ao (~ 01 SG ~ r.-1 ~~ ~~ ~ a a a a N ~ CO r--1 L ~D ~p ~p ~p ~ o ~ o ~ a ro o b ~ 6 ~ o d F O o O v~ N ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ axi 'a U U a`~ roro Pal ~ D O ~ .-. O O y ~ ~ ~ NN .b b ~ u U ~ n ~ o a o ~ .~- 3 ro O a u U ~ 3 ~ y 3 a ~ ~ v ~ °'~ ~ v ~ a Z U Q U ~ p W O O ro W O N ~ DD {~ ~ N N O a a a a; b o m °' w . A d u : a 6 ' a e n p o ~ o ,-~ ~ p o ~ FQ U N N N N N ~ N M I 0p0 ' Oaa0000 N N q O 4 o+ o ,o o ~ 0 0 N ~ ~ ~ O ~p ~ O p n ~ ~ ~ ~:- n ~ ~ ~ ~ a `o o N ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ o ~ ~ ~ c n a .o o N F ~ V ~ N ~ N O ~ C a~ ~ u ~a ~ ~ ~ qa ~ ,,., ~ w }~ ~ a3, ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~. n ~ 3 ~ . °; ai z z vi ~ v ~ C Rf ~ ~ a ~ r-I N cn o a ~ ~ r-i a z a ,,; S N C7 ~--I ~--I O O V U ~ Z U M ~ M ~ ~ ch ~ ~ Q 1 p I p a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N O ~ p p p ~~p ^ O ~ ~ p N . O y O ~ ~ N (! WW ~NJ V a M pp w aE r a O~ F.. ti -~ 0 .,, a ~i `~ m ~ 3 ~ ~ a a _ a - ,.., ~ ~ ~ ~'ti ~ ~a~ ° ~ w OOV~ v ~o i b am a E'' ch n u~ M O ',.~ n N r-I r-I '^ U M ~ L N 41 n O ~ n n d U O 0 ri r-I a .~ ~ M C.' M ' L+ a O m ~n ~z 3 ~ o ~ C W W ro ~O O ~I~ SGS Nrl O U U . 7 a y~ ~ u as o a i a B ° b ~ i~ a ~o •ao ~ °GQv° ~°'~ o o~'a o ~ w ~ w S O .~D O U w N N M M n] N N Ew 8 ( ~] ~ I p I p 1 r ~ W M ' Q~ ~ O O O O cr'f ~ n O O O N1 ~ ~ d ~ y ~-i ~ ~V.. p:':: V' i~ Q~ W H QQw a C~ n rn ~~ ~~ W a E O ii~~ u~ v F..~ q O n ~O N , ~ ~~ •u 0 ,~ as ~ o~ o u ~ ~ o 0 '^ U --i ~ N LO ~ O n rn O r-i M y~ yN V a w ~~ 01 ~~ / L it •ri y.i .,V{ U 'd W V • ~ ~ ri '~ ~ d1 'O y b N' N ~ U ~ .~ ~ F r1 W ,~ f 1- W 'D y i ~ ~ ~ ¢ N N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N ^ c+ j ~o 0 ~ ~ N ~ N ~ iJ Q~i Ql JJ a. ~+ ~ N a.i a.~ x a ,o ro N 3 ~ M H ~ N `~ a p a 0 V u 0 C N ri O p ~ '-i U U ~pp O q U -~ ~ N O O 4 q o q ~ 0 0 0 0 ~ N O `8 . -i N ~ ~ p O O O .Z y~y -7 y~ ®M !~ W M oo Q w ~i t~ a rn ~~~ ¢~a W ~~ U 'r W d L .r U 4J U L.~ U 'D rl rl •.~ u 'O b b C C U U W ~ «C CC ~ C w w w H ~ 8 ~ S rn ? S n ~ a N N M N ~ O n r~1 r-i ~ a ~ ..a as L a L ~ ~ ~ N ~^, ~ ~ dz N3 ~w •°r~ ~ , y., BOO •O CN N a~~ H W WO HO HO N [~1 O 0 y U U [ ak H H U ~ '1 ~ ~ ~ C ~ ~ p I p I p i O~ ~ ~ ~ O O O O t+1 r-1 r-1 u ~ p~ p~ ~ ~ p O O O f. H a~ ~~~ a w ~~ n rn ., N "` ~I a~ 'u y •V . ~ b W b W 4-~ E p O d u~ M ~ ~ rj ~ d N ~ M ~ ~ a HQ ~o 0 a a 6 ~ ~ ro .~ ~ ~ ~ r-1 ~ U ~ ~ H ~ O r-1 O ~ ~ ! v p~y fy 77 Q `i N N a o ~o ((ilil .~ L O ~ U b~ ~O O OW tiff ~~ ~~ ~O ~~ ~ ti' `~e~ w ti b~ ~~ ~O V~ i ~O V O~~ Oni ~ti ~~ ~u~ ~ R ~ ~~ .,~ °~ °~ ~, ~~ R ~~ n n ~~, ~~o ~~ ~~ h' ti. ~ ~o ~~ ti 'Q, O~ ~C .., ~~ ~O V~ ~d 0 one ~ti .. ~~ ,`o ~~ ~ /~~ ~ ti~ ~ ~J~ '~~D ~ ~~ ~~`y ~ ~~titi~~ ~ ~ o ~"~~ v~ 0 ~ ~ ~~ ~C5",,O 'n~~ QO by V ~~ ~ ~~ h o'ff' ~~ b~ ~c~' ti b ~~~ ~V ~~ ~~ ti~ ~ ~ ~~ b '~ ,~' ~~ ~~~ ~ti ~~ti~ LA rn rn • o rn N N 0 Q~ N N O O~ H O ~ O N p~ N O N O ~ N N (V ~ N V ~.~..~ ^y V V /My W 0 :v ~ a ~ ,te t~ Q; , b ~ ~ o ~, ~ a ° `~ ~ n n ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o 0 o ' ~ ~ ' rr t7 ~~ ~ LTJ ~ O ~ ~ ~ x ~ n ~ ~ ~ ~ n ~ o ~ ~ x O !-+ b O I ro z 0 ~z ~~ c'r rr ~~ rn rn V V H W N F-+ N ro O `~ TW N V o p z bzx ~ c-r n R, ~ v H ~ ~~ ~ `~ w 1 ~~ ~~~ N ~~~ N H ~1 ~ N w 0 0 `„' ~ N ~ Op ~ O ~'-' O O H s ~ ~ .. _ ~ ~ ~ b AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MAY 26, 1987 RESOLUTION N0.52687-6 APPROVING CONSTRUCTION PRIORITIES FOR THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY SYSTEM FOR ROANORE COUNTY FOR FISCAL YEAR 1987-88 BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1• The Board does hereby establish for fiscal year 1987-88 those certain construction fund priorities for the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System of Highways in Roanoke County as set out on that certain list of priorities with recommended amendments as presented to the Board at its meeting on May 26, 1987; and 2• That a copy of this resolution duly attested be forthwith forwarded to the Virginia Department of Transportation Salem Residency office along with a duly attested copy of said priority list with amendments by the Clerk to the Board. On motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by Supervisor McGraw and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson NAYS : None ABSENT: None A COPY - TESTE .mod Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors 5/27/87 CC: File John A. Peters, Assistant Director of Engineering Phillip Henry, Director of Engineering John Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator Virginia Department of Highways and Transportation A-52687-7 _ ITEM NUMBER ~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 26, 1987 SUBJECT: Request for Authorization to Establish a Water System for Thousand Oaks Subdivision. COUNTY ADMINISTRAT'OR' S COMMENT/S~: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The proposed Thousand Oaks Subdivision is a 190 lot subdivision located off Yellow Mountain Road as indicated on the attached map. The developer, Don Bandy, has requested that the County extend an existing County water line to provide water service to this subdivision. The Utility Department will not approve the extension at this time due to a planned re-alignment of Yellow Mountain Road by the Virginia Department of Transportation. Mr. Bandy wishes to begin development of Thousand Oaks as soon as possible, and does not want to delay this development until the roadway re-alignment is established. At the suggestion of County staff, Mr. Bandy would like to establish a complete water system under the provision of the County Water Ordinance, Section 20.1-5 (2) (a) as amended by Ordinance No. 1512. Under the provisions of this ordinance, prior to approval to establish a complete water system, the applicant shall agree to "provide a complete water system to serve the new area, convey the water distribution system within such new area to the County at no cost, and convey all supply and treatment facilities and other appurtenances to the County at cost, and pay the existing connection fee." This water system will be built to the County standards specified in the Water Ordinance, and will allow the developer to begin his subdivision without waiting for the realignment of Yellow Mountain Road. The Developer will then convey the facility to the County at his cost. The agreement between Mr. Bandy and the County would include the above statement on conveyance of the water system, and with payment for the cost of the supply, treatment, oversized lines, and storage facilities made by a 100$ credit of the off-site facilities fees associated with the Thousand Oaks Subdivision until such time as the Developer is reimbursed the entire cost for those facilities. The Developer, however, would pay the appropriate portion of the basic connection fee for water which would reduce the actual cost of each meter installed, which is presently $20.00. FISCAL IMPACT • ~? `~'~ ~^--- S There is no direct impact on the Utility funds. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the County Administrator be authorized to execute an agreement with the developer as provided by the Water Ordinance and with the terms as stated above. SUBMITTED BY: Cliffo raig Director of Utilities APPROVED: r/rGtiO Elmer C. Hodg" County Administrator ------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ~ Motion by: HCN/BLJ to approve No Yes Abs Denied ( ) staff recommendation Brittle Received ( ) X Referred Garrett X To Johnson X McGraw X Nickens X cc: File John Hubbard Clifford Craig EXCAVATING CONTRACTOR DON BANDY, PRESIDENT April ~, 197 JOB BANDY 8z SON, INC. ,~ t~~w~,~. P. O. BOX 4061 ROANOKE, VA. 24015 PHONE: 342 -518 ~, '~a f~c%~ r._~ ~ f,.,'r . ,. ,~ .~, ,. .. .. ~ ~ r. i~~f .~ Mr. Cliff Craig Roanoke County Facilities P, o. Box 300 Ry~anoke, Virginia 240i~ ?~~: Thousand Oaks Subdivision Dear Mr. Craig; I am requesting a reimbursement of 100;0 cost for water improvements for Thousand Oaks Subdivision which consiUts of Weil, wate_~ liile~ and storage tanks. Yaur cooperation and prompt reply will be very much appreciated. Since~ly yours, Don Bandy DB/jc ,,,: i_ L:.„~ r ~- NORTH is ,, ~ , ~, ,- ~~~ .~ ,.. ~~ ~. cer•, .. ~. 'W , gha / - ?s , m ~ ~~\ ~~ '~ ~ -~ I ~ ~~~ ~ ~ A S ) \ ~ - ~i~ ~~ f~ ~~~ f /~/~ _ /~~ r 11 ~.~~ - ~. I ~ - I ~ ~~ ~ I ~ ' ~ -~ / .--- / / ~~ \ 1 ~ ~~ Mart ~ , •~ ~ ~. ~\~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~ ~ l` - _ _/ `~.- ~ ~ : ~ ' > ~ ~.'~, ~ ~ q~ l~~C° _ ~, ~,\ _ _ ` ~--~ ~ ~ 1 1 r <9.L . ~~l •~ ~ % / t•~ ,~: h ~~' ~~/ ~~Ol~}lil~Ch•N~ '/.- I If. f. t _ ~f _ ,, ~-' C z , ., ;~ A ,~zs ~. ._ 1 ~6« _ _ ~ ~ ~~_/ 8 ~ ~' ~ ~ ,~ ,. ~ ~ ~ , ,~ _ ~ . ~ ._ . (\, ~.•~ Y ~ ~ ~ ~U / ~ i- Y ~ _ ~ ~ ~ 1240 i, _ a e• Hill h - `_'A -'1 ~1 ' ~~ ~; / /~f~%_'J,~~~hir ~-- ~I s~, I/ ~~ ~ / ~ i ~•~ ~ .~ `:i 97 -J :~ ; ;~J~J i/l~l ~ ~ ~~i7 - ~ r~~ ~J. III ~~/~ DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC FACILITIES THOUSAND OAKS SUBD~V~S~ON A-52687-14 Item L' '°°~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER IN ROANOKE, VA., ON TUESDAY, MEETING DATE: May 26, 1987 SUBJECT: Request for authorization to Transfer of Hollins Water System to Hollins Community Development Corporation COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: In order to receive grant funds from Farmers Home Administration (FmHA) for the proposed construction of the sewer and water system in the "Old Fields" area of the Hollins Community, it is required that the Hollins Community Development Corporation own the water system and associated property and right-of-ways. The new utility systems will be owned by the Hollins Community Development Corporation. Under a separate agreement, Roanoke County will continue to operate these systems. A part of this transfer will be the requirement that connection fees to the Hollins Community Development Corporation system will be the same as established for a County utility system. All off-site facility or availability fees collected for connection to this system must be applied to the FmHA loan balance until such time that Roanoke County purchases the utility system. The Department of Utilities concurs with this request and recommends waiving of provisions of the water ordinance which prohibits private water systems. FISCAL IMPACT:p~~ The fiscal imp~'act of this transfer will not require additional funds from Roanoke County. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board authorize the County Adminis- trator to execute the necessary documents to transfer the Hollins water system to the Hollins Community Development Corporation with terms as stated above. SUBMITTED BY: ~~---~~ 2-E'~%rc~C-cam /, ) Sue Palmer ~"'" Develo ment Community p Coordinator APPROVED: .^ --.k ~- 1~ Elmer C. Hodge, Jr. ------------------------------------County Administrator Approved (X) Motion b ACTION ------------------ Denied ( ) staff reco BLJ/AHB to approve VOTE Received ( ) mmendation No Yes Abs Referred Brittle X To Garrett X Johnson X McGraw X cc: File Nickens X Tim Gubala Sue Palmer Clifford Craig John Hubbard ,. ITEM NUMBER~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 26, 19$7 SUBJECT: Appointments to Committees COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Fifth Planning District Commission: The three-year term of Bob L. Johnson expires on June 30, 1987. Mr. Johnson was filling the unexpired term of A thena Burton, and is an elected representative to this Commission. Please see the attached for further information. Recreation Commission: The two year terms of Mr. Hugh Key, representing the Cave Spring Magisterial District; Mr. W. E. Hoge, representing the Windsor Hills Magisterial District; and Michael J. Lazzuri, an at-large member expire June 30, 1987. Original terms were staggered, but new terms shall be for three years. Please see the attached for further information. Virginia Western Community College Board: The four-year terms of Mrs. Sylvia Faw and Mr. Stephen A. Musselwhite expire June 30, 1987. Please see the attached for further information. Submitted By: Mary H. Allen Deputy Clerk Approved by: ~v Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ,' _.. ~, ~..~,~ um Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred To Motion by: ACTION Brittle Garrett Johnson McGraw Nickens VOTE No Yes Abs 145 W. CAMPBELL AVENUE P.O. BOX 2569 ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24010 (703) 343-4417 GORDON N. DIXON Executive Director May 15 , 1987 Ms. Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, Virginia 24018-0798 Dear Ms. Allen: According to our record of appointments, the term of Mr. Bob Johnson, elected representative of the County of Roanoke on the Fifth Planning District Commission, expires June 30, 1987. The Commission Bylaws state that all appointments are for three-year terms. Mr. Johnson is, of course, eligible for reappointment. Please notify the Commission of Roanoke County's official action in filling this upcoming vacancy on the Commission. Thank you. Yours truly, `Gordon Dixon ~~~ Secretary to the Commission /jlp cc: Mr. Bob Johnson Mr, Charles Hill, SPDC Chairman FIFTH PLANNING DISTRICT COMMISSION A. COMPOSITION Commission to consist of five (5) representatives of Roanoke County based on population, three representatives who shall be elected members of the governing bodies, and two members who shall be non-elected citizens. The term of office shall be three years. One of the members shall also serve on the Executive Committee . The Fifth Planning District Commission represents participating local governments included in the geographic area delineated by the Commonwealth of Virginia. The commission is composed of 21 elected and citizen representatives of the participating jurisdictions. B. DUTIES The purpose of the commission as defined by the Virginia Area Development Act is "...to promote orderly and efficient development of the physical, social and economic elements of the District by planning, encouraging and assisting governmental subdivisions to plan for the future." The general management program category provides the basic organization and management of commission activities and routine administrative functions. Because general management supports the entire operation of the commission's work program, costs allocated to the program activity are generally considered as administrative or indirect costs and charged to other program categories in accordance with the Commission's Cost Allocation Plan . C. MEETING SCHEDULE Fourth Thursday of each month; held in Commission Conference Room, at 3:00 p.m. (time subject to change.) RECREATION COMMISSION A• COMPOSITION: (Resolution 85-151.N, September 10, 1985) To be composed of two (2) members from each magisterial district and one (1) member at large from the County. All members to be appointed by the Board of Supervisors. Original terms shall be staggared. Upon expiration of their original terms, each succeeding term shall be for three (3) years, expiring on June 30th. B• DUTIES- The Commission shall serve as the advisory body to the Director of Parks and Recreation of Roanoke County; the Commission shall suggest policies to the County Administrator and the Board of Supervisors through the Director of Parks and Recreation, within its powers and responsibilities as stated in this resolution. The Commission shall serve as a liaison between the Department of Parks and Recreation, the Board of Supervisors, and the citizens of the community. The Commission will work through the Parks and Recreation staff on all related matters. The Commission shall consult with and advise recreation policies, programs, personnel, finances, and the need for acquiring and disposing of lands and. properties related to the total community recreation program, and to its long-range, projected program for recreation. The Commission shall assume duties for the recreation purposes as follows: Make recommendations (1) for the establishment of a system of supervised recreation for the County; (2) to set apart for use as parks, playgrounds, recreation centers, water areas, or other recreation areas and structures, any lands or buildings owned by or leased to the County and for approval by the Board of Supervisors and may suggest improvements of such lands and for the construction and for the equipping and staffing of such buildings and structures as may be necessary to the recreation program within those funds allocated; (3) and advise in the acceptance by the County of any grant, gift, bequest or donation, any personal or real property offered or made available for recreation purposes and which it judges to be of present or possible future use or recreation. Any gift, bequest of money or other property, any grant, devise of real or personal property so acquired shall be held, by the County, used and finally disposed of in accordance with the terms under which such grant, gift or devise is made and accepted; (4) and advise in the construction, equipping, operation and maintenance of parks, playgrounds, recreation centers and all buildings and structures necessary or useful to the Department function, and will advise in regard to other recreation facilities which are owned or controlled by the unit or leased or loaned to the unit. V / VIRGINIA WESTERN COMMUNITY COLLEGE BOARD A. COMPOSITION: To be as follows: minimum of nine (9) persons, not to exceed fifteen (15) includes at least one (1) person from each political subdivision sponsoring the college. County appointees to consist of three (3) persons. B. DUTIES• 1. Shall perform such duties with respect to the operation of a community college. 2. Serve as channels of communication between the State Board for Community College and governing bodies of the local political subdivisions., 3. Shall participate with the Chancellor of the Community College System and the State Board of Community Colleges in the selection, evaluation and removal of the president of the community college. 4. Responsible for eliciting community participation in program planning and development establishing local citizens' advisory committees for specialized programs and curricula and approving the appointments of all members of these committees. 5. Shall review all new curricular proposals for the community college. 6. Shall oversee the development and evaluations of the community service program for the community college. 7. Shall review and make recommendations concerning the biennial budget Program Proposal for the community college as prepared by the college president. 8. Shall review and approve a detailed local funds budget for the community college as prepared by the college president. 9. Responsible for the review and approval of a budget prepared by the college president for the expenditure of revenues from vending commissions and auxiliary enterprises, including the student activity fund. 10. Responsible for reviewing reports of audit and for reviewing the college president's response to those ~+ reports of audit. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MAY 26, 1987 RESOLUTION N0.52687-8 APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM J - CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That that certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for May 26, 1987, designated as Item J - Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 6, inclusive, as follows: 1. Minutes of Meeting - April 14, 1987 2. Request to classify Eastern Bypass as a "Rural Other Principal Arterial" and add to the Federal Aid Primary System" 3. Revision of the Secondary Highway System concerning alteration of Route 711. 4. Acceptance of Water facilities serving Edinburgh Square . 5. Acceptance of Water and Sewer facilities serving Kingston Court, Section 1. 6. Approval of Special Leave Extension for Workers' Compensation Injury. 2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this resolution. Or -r AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CEN'PER ON TUESDAY, MAY 26, 1987 RESOLUTION NO. APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH OIV THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM J - CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That that certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for May 26, 1987, designated as Item J - Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 6, inclusive, as follows: 1. Minutes of Meeting - April 14, 1987 2. Request to classify Eastern Bypass as a "Rural Other Principal Arterial" and add to the Federal Aid Primary System 3. Revision of the Secondary Highway System concerning alteration of Route 711. 4. Acceptance of Water facilities serving Edinburgh Square. 5. Acceptance of Water and Sewer facilities serving Kingston Court, Section 1. 6. Approval of Special Leave Extension for Workers' Compensation Injury. 2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this resolution. ., R_ _ April 14, 1987 Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Roanoke County Administration Center 3738 Brambleton Avenue, SW Roanoke, Virginia 24018 April 14, 1987 The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors of Roanok County, Viri,ia; met this day at the Roanoke Count Administration Center, this being the first Tuesday, and the first regularly scheduled meeting of the month of April, 1987. IN RE: CALL TO ORDER Chairman Johnson called the meeting to order at 2:0~ p.m. The roll call was taken. MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Bob L. Johnson, Vice Chairman Lee Garrett, Supervisors Alan H. Brittle Steven A. McGraw MEMBERS ABSENT: Supervisor Harry C. Nickens (arrived at 2:10 p.m.) STAFF PRESENT: Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator; John M. Chambliss, Assistant Count Administrator for Management Services; Joh R. Hubbard, Assistant County Administrato of Public Facilities; Timothy W. Gubala Assistant County Administrator fo Community Development; Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney, Mary H. Allen, Deput Clerk; D. Keith Cook, Director of Huma Resources, Kenneth Hogan, Chief Anima Control Officer; Reta Busher, Director o Management and Budget IN RE: OPENING CEREMONIES The invocation was given by John Chambliss, Assistan County Administrator. The Pledge of Allegiance was recited b all present. ~- / z April 14, 1987 !-J IN RE: REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS County Administrator Elmer Hodge requested that item L-2 on the Consent Agenda be changed to "Authorization to request Industrial Access Funds for Southwest Industrial Park, and that item E-4, "Request for Industrial Access Funds for Bolling, Steel", be added. SIN RE: PROCLAMATION, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS AND AWARDS 1. Presentation of Plaque to Roanoke County for participation in the Constitution's Bicentennial: E. Laban' Johnson, Chairman of the Roanoke Valley Bicentennial Commission' was present to present a framed plaque from the State Commission'., to Roanoke County in recognition of the County's participation in. the Constitution's Bicentennial activities. 2. Resolution of Congratulations to Department Employees of the Year and County Employee of the Year: D. Keith Cook, Director of Human Resources, reported this was the first year of the Employee of the Year Program. Fifteen employees were nominated by their departments for this honor. Mr. Cook presented those employees to the Board of Supervisors, and they received Resolutions of Congratulation and Sesquicentennial Cups. There were: Deputy Jerry Custer, Sheriff's Department; Linda Gailey, Sheriff's Department; Deborah Goolsby, Social Services, Mary Hicks, County Administrator's Office, Captain Mark Light, Fire and Rescue Department; Ruth. Lipnik, Library; Hope Patsel, Commissioner of Revenue's Office,'. Deputy Linda Payne, Sheriff's Department; Wanda Riley, Office of the Assistant Administrator of Public Facilities; Darrell Shell,. Recreation Department; Rob Stalzer, Planning and Zoning, April 14, 1987 Department; Janice Stout, Department of Human Resources; Lieutenant Barry Tayloe, Sheriff's Department; Nancy Thomas, Treasurer's Office; and Deputy Dianna Wright; Sheriff's Department. Following recognition of the Department Employee of th Year awards, the County Employee of the Year award was presented to Janice Stout, Personnel Assistant in the Department of Human Resources. She was chosen by a committee composed of five representatives from the Employee Advisory Committee. Supervisor Johnson moved to approve the prepares resolutions. The motion was seconded by Supervisor McGraw RESOLUTION OF CONGRATULATIONS TO JANICE K. STOUT UPON HER SELECTION AS ROANOKE COUNTY EMPLOYEE OF THE YEAR BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: WHEREAS, The Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia approved an Employee of the Year Program in November 1986; and WHEREAS, the purpose of this program is to recognize outstanding employees and encourage excellence in performance of job duties; and WHEREAS, a committee appointed by the County Administrator and made up of five representatives from the Employee Advisory Committee selected the 1986 Roanoke County Employee of the Year from a group of departmental nominees; and WHEREAS, Janice K. Stout was selected by this committee as the 1986 Employee of the Year, and WHEREAS, Janice K. Stout is deserving of special recognition by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, and the citizens of Roanoke County for her outstanding contributions made during the year 1986. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County expresses its deepest appreciation to Janice K. Stout for her excellent performance, and capable, loyal, and dedicated service to the citizens of Roanoke County; and FURTHER, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County offers its congratulations to Janice K. Stout for being selected as Employee of the Year for 1986. April 14, 1987 -. ~ _ ---- RESOLUTION 41487-1 OF CONGRATULATIONS TO FIFTEEN COUNTY EMPLOYEES UPON THEIR SELECTION AS A DEPARTMENTAL EMPLOYEE OF THE YEAR 1986 BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke (County, Virginia, as follows: WHEREAS, The Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia approved an Employee of the Year Program in November L986 to recognize outstanding employees and encourage excellence performance of job duties; and WHEREAS, fifteen finalists were nominated by their individual departments based on criteria which included excellence in the performance of job duties, display of service to the public and to fellow employees, and contribution of saving or labor-saving ideas; and WHEREAS, these fifteen employees are also the finalists the Employee of the Y_.r Program; and WHEREAS, they are deserving of special recognition by he Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, and the citizens of oanoke County for their outstanding contributions to the County wring 1986, and WHEREAS, these employees will be present to receive individual resolutions congratulating them for receiving this honor. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that 'the Board of upervisors of Roanoke County expresses its deepest appreciation o these employees for their excellent performance and their spable, loyal, and dedicated service to the citizens of Roanoke ounty; and FURTHER, The Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County ffers its congratulations to these fifteen employees for being elected Departmental Employees of the Year and finalists in the nployee of the Year Program for 1986. ~-/ f April 14, 1987 On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor McGraw, and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None IIN RE: NEW BUSINESS 1. Presentation on the Green Hill Horse Center: Supervisor McGraw, a member of the Horse Center Advisory Committee recognized the Chairman of the Committee, Don Sutten, and introduced the members of the committee who were present. Mr. Sutton announced that the committee had completed the planning stage of the center. A concept plan has now been devised on the 30 acre site, and each phase has been accepted by the Committee. Each phase will be implemented as funds become available. Mr. Eldon Karr presented a slide show showing the plans for the horse center. Mr. Karr stated that the horse center is part of the Park Master Plan for Roanoke County. Chairman Johnson commended the committee and Mr. Karr on their work, and pointed out the importance of this being a joint effort I between the public sector and private citizen involvement. it 2. Request for Approval of a Safety Belt Policy: Director of Human Resources D. Keith Cook announced that his) department has developed a Safety Belt Policy in County vehicles. This policy has been reviewed with the Employee Advisory) Committee and Employee Safety Task Force Committee for suggestions and recommendations. Mr. Cook outlined the policy and plans for implementation, and recommended that the policy begin on July 1, 1987. This would allow time for an educational program for the employees. Mr. Cook also announced the State of Virginia has also passed a similar policy which will go into effect on January 1, 1988. ~--r April 14, 1987 Supervisor Nickens suggested that the Safety Council of Southwest Virginia be involved in the educational process. Supervisor Brittle moved to approve the safety belt policy. The motion was seconded by Supervisor McGraw and carried by the following recorded vote: ..AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None 3. Request for Approval of Rabies Prevention Program 'if or Cats: Kenneth Hogan, Chief Animal Control Officer I~reported that rabid cats are now a much more serious problem than in years past. Mr. Hogan presented color-coded maps showing the spread of rabies throughout Virginia. While rabies has not become a problem in the Roanoke Valley, surrounding localities have already experienced an upsurge in the number of rabid animals. Of the confirmed cases of rabies in Virginia from 1980 to 1986, there were 3 rabid dogs and 29 rabid cats. Supervisor Brittle asked if Mr. Hogan had a projection on the number of cats that might be picked up. Mr. Hogan responded that most of the animals will be unadoptable and euthanized. Supervisor Nickens was concerned that the amount of'~ I time spent picking up cats might take away time spent answering complaints of dogs running at large. He questioned the enforceability of the proposed ordinance, and suggested that the item be postponed. Mr. Hodge responded that the item is only for discussion at this time, and the proposed ordinance must go through first and second reading of the ordinance before it is passed. Supervisor McGraw moved to approve a Rabies prevention program and moved forward with the first reading of the ordinance. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Johnson and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None s_~ April 14, 1987 ABSENT: None 4. Request for Approval of Industrial Access Funds for Bolling Steel: Timothy Gubala, Assistant County Administrator for Community Development reported that in 1979, Roanoke County initiated an Industrial Access request for Bolling Steel off Route 11/460. The original request was dropped because of the drainage problems and exorbitant cost of constructing the road. Staff has since been meeting with them to find other alternatives. There is now an adjacent landowner willing to donate land for a right-of-way. With the donation, the construction is estimated to cost only $50,000 to $60,000 and would come from next year's fiscal allocation. Supervisor Nickens moved to request Industrial Access Funds for Bolling Steel and accept the right of way from the adjoining property owner. The motion was seconded by Supervisor McGraw and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None !ABSENT: None IIN RE: REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS None IIN RE: REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS None IIN RE: FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 1._ Ordinance authorizing acquisition of a drainage 'easement from the Trustees of Fort Lewis Christian Church: County Attorney Paul Mahoney reported that in November of 1986,' the Board of Supervisors accepted the donation of an easement for drainage purposes from the trustees of the Fort Lewis Christian J-/ April 14, 1987 J~- / Church. Since then, the trustees have changed their mind, and voted to ask for the fair market value of the property, which is $120.00. This will be paid from a subdivision bond. This drainage easement will resolve a drainage problem in the Fort Lewis Village Subdivision. Supervisor McGraw moved to rescind the previous Board action and approve the first reading of the ordinance. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Nickens and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None ABSENT: None ~IN RE: SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance authorizing the acquisition of Easements1 North Lakes water Line Interconnection• Mr. Mahoney! announced that this ordinance authorizes the acquisition of easements across real estate of approximately five property owners, and is necessary to complete the North Lakes Water Line Interconnection Project. The first reading was held on March 24, I~1987. Supervisor Johnson moved to approve the second reading of the ordinance. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Garrett. ORDINANCE 41487-5 AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION OF EASEMENTS, NORTH LAKES WATER LINE INTERCONNECTION PROJECT BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading concerning the acquisition of five easements for the North Lakes Water Line Interconnection Project was held on March 24, 1987. A second reading was held on April 14, 1987. April 14, 1987 -- - .T- / 2. That these easements are for underground water lines for North Lakes Water Line Interconnection Project. This project will replace existing poor quality well water and will provide a necessary utility service to the citizens of Roanoke County. 3. That the County Administrator is authorized to exe- cute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County as are necessary to accomplish the conveyance of said pro- perty, all of which shall be upon form approved by the County Attorney. On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor Garrett, and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None ABSTAIN: Supervisor McGraw 2. Ordinance acceotina an offer for and authorizing the sale_of real estate, The Old Courthouse in Salem, Virginia• Mr. Mahoney announced that the first reading of this ordinance was held on March 24, 1987. Mr. Mahoney stated he had received a written offer on the property and requested an Executive Session prior to taking action on the ordinance. SIN RE: EXECUTIVE SESSION At 3:05 p.m. Supervisor Nickens moved to go into Executive Session pursuant to the Code of Virginia, Section 2.1-344 (a) (2) to consider a real estate matter. The motion was seconded by Supervisor McGraw and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisor Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens NAYS: Supervisor Johnson ABSENT: None April 14, 1987 y / - - ,~/~ IN RE: OPEN SESSION At 3:20 p.m., Supervisor Brittle moved to return to Open Session. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Johnson and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None ABSENT: None IZN RE: SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES (CONTINUED) 2. Ordinance acceoting an offer for and authorizing ',the sale of real estate, The Old Courthouse in Salem, Virginia (Continued): Chairman Johnson asked if anyone was present to speak concerning this ordinance. Lee B. Eddy, a member of they Planning Commission, spoke to the Board, stating that the Planning Commission had unanimously passed a resolution that'I action not take place on the sale of the Old Courthouse until the public had heard about the proposed sale and had an opportunity to express their views. He suggested that a decision be deferred until other citizens and organizations be given the opportunity to give advice or opinion. Supervisor McGraw asked if the deed could contain a clause that the property revert to the County if it ceases to be used as intended. Mr. Mahoney responded this could be done. Chairman Johnson pointed out that the public has had ample opportunity to be aware of this action, due to newspaper articles and TV reports on the subject. County Administration Elmer Hodge also announced that First and Second Reading of Ordinances serve the purpose of informing the public of this type of action, and he has also discussed this with various media, the judges and Salemi officials. April 14, 1987 Supervisor Johnson moved to approved the second reading of the ordinance approving the sale of the Old Courthouse to Roanoke College in the amount of $500,000. Supervisor Nickens seconded the motion. Supervisor Nickens asked if the motion could be amended to include clauses in the document protecting the historical integrity of the Courthouse and establishing a payment schedule. Bill Walton, Vice President of Roanoke College responded the college would agree to such clauses. ORDINANCE 41487-6 ACCEPTING AN OFFER FOR AND AUTHORIZING THE SALE OF REAL ESTATE, THE OLD COURTHOUSE IN SALEM, VIRGINIA BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading concerning the sale and disposi;.iuu of the hereinafter-described real estate was ''held on March 24, 1987. A second reading and public hearing on this matter was held on April 14, 1987. This real estate con- sists of approximately 1.265 acre located on College Avenue and East Main Streets in the City of Salem, Virginia, and is known as the old County Courthouse; and 2. That an offer has been received for this property, said offer from Roanoke College in the amount of $500,000, and is hereby accepted. All other offers are hereby rejected. 3. That the County Administrator is authorized to exe- cute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County as are necessary to accomplish the conveyance of said pro- perty, all of which shall be upon form approved by the County Attorney. On motion of Supervisor Johnson with a clause in the contract that will protect the historical integrity of the Old """ 1 ,:, .,. April 14, 1987 ,~-~ , Courthouse and set a payment schedule, seconded by Supervisor Nickens and the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None IN RE: REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS Supervisor Brittle announced that T. D. Steele has requested a letter from the Board of Supervisors in support of a Certificate of Need for a 120 bed nursing facility near Buck Mountain Road. Supervisor Brittle moved that the Chairman draft such a letter. Supervisor Johnson seconded the motion. Supervisor Nickens asked if rezoning was necessary for the nursing facility. He was concerned that if a letter of support was sent by the Board, and then later the Board must hear a ,rezoning on the matter, it could place the Board in a difficult lisituation. County Attorney Paul Mahoney stated that if a 'rezoning was necessary, he would not recommend a letter of ,support be sent. Chairman Johnson asked Assistant County ',Administrator Tim Gubala to investigate to see if a rezoning ,would be necessary and report back to the Board by the end of the meeting. Supervisor Garrett asked if handicapped people could be deputized to issue citations to those parked in handicapped, spaces. Chairman Johnson directed County Attorney Paul Mahoney to study this issue for legalities and report back to the Board of Supervisors on April 28, 1987. Supervisor Brittle also suggested that contact be made with various handicapped agencies to put pressure on commercial to properly mark handicapped spaces for enforceability. ~9; April 14, 1987 IIG Supervisor McGraw asked if a more severe litte ordinance could be adopted. Mr. Mahoney stated the presen ordinance is written well, but enforceability is the problem Chairman Johnson directed Mr. Mahoney to review the possibility of adding stronger enforcement measures to the ordinance, anc report back to the Board of Supervisors. IN RE: CONSENT AGENDA Supervisor Nickens moved approval of the Consent Agenda with the correction to Item L-2. Supervisor Garrett seconded the motion. RESOLUTION NO. 41487-7 APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM L - CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That tha t certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for April 14, 1987, designated as Item L - Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designa ted Items 1 through 3, inclusive, as follows: 1• Acceptance of water and sewer lines in Cave Spring Office Park. 2. Authorization to request Industrial Access Funds for Southwest Industrial Park. 3• Approval of a Raffle Permit for North Cross School. 2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized ind directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said terns the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to his resolution. On motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by Supervisor arrett and upon the following recorded vote: S April 14, 1987 YES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson AYS: None IIIN RE: REPORTS The following reports were received and filed: 1. Ccntingency Fund Balance 2. Youth Haven II Status Report 3. 1986 Annual Report of the Planning Commission, Board of Zoning Appeals and Department of Planning and Zoning. 4. Accounts Paid for March 1987 5. Unappropriated Fund Balance. IN RE: BUDGET WORK SESSION Chairman Johnson announced that the budget preparation has been a difficult process this year. Following adoption of this budget, Chairman Johnson proposed that the School Board, the Board of Supervisors, and both staffs meet together to look at the finances and capital needs of the County for the next five years, so that all are aware of the revenues and constraints. Chairman Johnson moved that $200,000 from the sale of the Old Courthouse, $100,000 from the Unappropriated Fund Balance, $50,000 from the Board Contingency Fund, and $150,000 anticipated from the sale of unnamed real estate be affixed to the Roanoke County School budget under Item 17B1. Supervisor Barrett seconded the motion. Bayes Wilson, Superintendent of Schools explained Item 17B1 was the instruction account which gays the salaries of teachers, principals, counselors, aides, school secretaries, and certain supply accounts. Supervisor 'ohnson responded his intent is that these funds be used for an 8 ercent raise in teacher's salaries. Mr. Wilson advised their top April 14, 1987 --- __ _._ -- ----- -- -. P; priorities are instructional salaries and purchase ofschoo buses. Supervisor Nickens stated that there is an excess o $600,000 that was not budgeted to be utilized in the Curren operating budget, but is money that is expended or earmarked fo: expenditures. His concern is that this is the fifth year that the Board was going to live within its resources and not spen~ non-recurring revenue, and yet now the Board is going to spenc another $500,000 of non-recurring revenue for recurring expenses. Supervisor Nickens asked Mr. Wilson how he funded 18 additional personnel positions when they were not budgeted. Mr. Wilson responded some of that surplus was budgeted in the School Bus Fund, and some was budgeted in the Textbook Fund, and some were unbudgeted. There is some confusion as to what the surplus actually is. There were 18 positions cut from last year's budget. They later found they needed eight of the positions and planned to request extra sales tax if necessary. They anticipate approximately $90,000 surplus this year which will go into the School Bus Fund. Supervisor Nickens made a substitute motion to Supervisor Johnson's motion to lower the amount to $300,000, to increase the decal fee by $5.00 which would generate an additional $200,000, and that the Fund Balance be restored by $100,000 and $I00,000 be used to fund CORTRAN. There was no second, and the substitute died. Supervisor McGraw stated that he was concerned with diving teachers an 8 percent raise while other County employees +ill receive only a 5 percent raise, and was also concerned with ising non-recurring revenues for this purpose. Supervisor Brittle felt that there was much to do in he area of consolidating services between the County and School ivision in areas of recreation, transportation and others. 3 11. EII `".` t April 14, 1987 Mr, Hodge pointed out the danger of using $150,000 i ale of land which the County does not even have under contract e was also concerned about where the money will come from i he sale does not go through. There is also a potential $100,001 iability which has hPOrr7iscussed in Executive Session, and 40,000 YMCA payment that has not been budgeted for. There was further discussion on funding for other item uch as the Blue Ridge Region, Cultural Enrichment, Human ervices, and the continuation of Roanoke County_ T_ oday Supervisor Johnson's motion carried by the following ecorded vote: YES: Supervisor Brittle, Garrett, Johnson AYS: Supervisors McGraw, Nickens Supervisor Johnson moved to adopt the Roanoke County udget as amended by his previous motion, Supervisor Brittle econded the motion, Supervisor Nickens requested a substitute motion to mend the budget by the following: that the Human Services udget be funded at $24,600; that the Cultural Enrichment fund be iverted to fund CORTRAN; that the Blue Ridge Region be funded in he amount of $1,000; that the Municipal Clerk's Association be eleted; that the League of Women Voters funding be deleted; and hat Mental Health Service budget be reduced by two percent, and hat the County Administrator amend the budget to reflect these hanges, Supervisor McGraw seconded the motion, and the motion ailed by the following recorded vote: OYES: Supervisors McGraw, Nickens VA YS: Supervisors Brittle , Garrett, Johnson Supervisor Nickens requested a substitute motion that could delete the $38,000 from the Board Contingency Fund and the '20,000 budgeted for the Cultural Enrichment Fund, and that those unds be diverted to CORTRAN funding, Supervisor McGraw seconded he motion, The motion failed by the following recorded vote: n ~-1 F f..~ ,, ~~ April 14, 1987 - -. ------ ---- --- -~ - ----- AYES: Supervisors McGraw, Nickens NAYS: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, Johnson Supervisor Johnson's original motion to adopt the Roanoke County budget with $500,000 additional funds for the school budget carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, Johnson NAYS: Supervisors McGraw, Nickens Frank Thomas, Chairman of the School Board, thanked the Board of Supervisors for their support of education in Roanoke County, and stated that the School Board understood the intent of the supervisors that the additional funds be used for teacher's salaries. Iln ~~ I E. Supervisor Johnson moved to adopt the school budget with the additional funds of $500,000, The motion was seconded by Supervisor Brittle and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, Johnson NAYS: Supervisors McGraw, Nickens Superintendent of Schools Bayes Wilson again thanked the supervisors and County staff for their support and pledged support to work together in the future to solve any problems that exist. IN RE: LETTER OF SUPPORT FOR CERTIFICATE OF NEED FOR A NURSING FACILITY Chairman Johnson removed from the table this issue vhich was discussed earlier. Supervisor Brittle stated that he ias found there is a portion of the T. D. Steele property which gill require a rezoning, and he is therefore withdrawing his otion. N RE: EXECUTIVE SESSION At 5:15 p.m,, Chairman Johnson moved to go into cecutive Session pursuant to the Code of Virginia Section ,~- / April 14, 1987 "'~ / - -~ - - --------- -- ~J 1-344 (a) (1} to discuss a personnel matter; and (6) to discuss legal matter, the Reynolds litigation. Supervisor Brittle conded the motion, and the motion carried by a unanimous voice te. N RE: OPEN SESSION At 5:45, Chairman Johnson moved to return to Open ession. THe motion was seconded by Supervisor Brittle and irried by a unanimous voice vote. N RE: ADJOURNMENT At 5:46, Chairman Johnson adjourned the meeting. Bob L. Johnson, Chairman A-52687-8a ITEM NUMBER ~" AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 26, 1987 SUBJECT: Classify Eastern Bypass as a "Rural Other-Primary Arterial" and add to the Federal Aid Primary System COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~~ ~~~~ SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: As part of the attempt to construct an Eastern Bypass from Route 220 South to Interstate 81, VDOT is requesting the use of Federal Funds to defer part of the ultimate construction cost. In order to assist the State in qualifying for Federal Funding, the Board of Supervisors needs to classify the future Eastern Bypass from Route 220 to Route 116 as a "Rural Other Principal Arterial" and add the proposed road to the Federal-Aid Primary System." ~~ Cl FISCAL IMPACT: ~,~~ None. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board add the Eastern Bypass from Route 220 to Route 116 to the Functional Classification System as a "Rural Other Principal Arterial" and to the Federal-Aid System as a "Federal-Aid Primary." SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED: ., n A. Peters, II istant Director ineering I ~ P. E. of ~~~~/ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator 1 ~ . ~,J "" ..~ VOTE Approved (X) Motion by: AHCN/BLJ to a Denied ( ) staff recommen anon pprove No Yes Abs Received ( ) Brittle X Referred Garrett X to Johnson g McGraw X Nickens X cc: File John Peters John Hubbard 2 i ITEM NUMBER ___' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BNOKE COUNTYEADMINISTRATIONNOCENTER COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROA MEETING DATE: May 26, 1987 Revision to the Secondary Highway System in Roanoke SUBJECT: County COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: a ~:~°'~ SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: ervisors must the Roanoke County Board of Sup By State Code, Highway System. Since approve all revisions to tartSofotherRoute 221 Project on Bent Route 711 was altered asepvisors needs to approve the attached Mountain, the Board of Sup resolution. `~ l ~ ~:.~' FISCAL IMPACT : ~-~ y hway the Route 221 Project was funded from State Primar Hig None, Construction Funds. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the approval of the attached resolution. SUBMITTED BY: (~ ~(l.~ ,~--- n A ters, I11, r. E. istant Director Engineering ppPROVED Z~.c~' Elmer C. Hod e County Administrator 1 -------------------------- VOTE ------------------------ ACTION No Yes Abs ~ Motion bY~ Brittle - - - Approved ( Garrett - - Denied ( ~ Johnson - - Received ( ~ McGraw - - - Referred Nickens _ - - To ____-- 2 C LL a z= 00 ~w ua O ip W ~ oEi O O ~n m W O o = o ~N v o ~ O v ~ i F E N ~ U o '~ ° m Y W o~ i n N O °o .a o E c 0 v Q a o o a $r ~ - o Z N v o~ o O N Q o o c U W _ o W F r o f N ~ o ~ o u ~~ O c c ~ Z ~ ° °u 3 v Q °' ~' c p Z '" ~ O o 0 0 0 Q O o 0 0 0 w Y Z Q ajOin~n ~ncn N N U Z ~ ~ ,'' W Z -' u00 ZUN Q =z3 U Q ~ N C O {~ N N Q ~+olO _ ~ 01 O ` ~ ° N nv 0 0 = u ~ 0 >° cn ~ AT A REGULAR MEETI LU AT THE ROANOKEFCOUNTYIADMINISTRATOON COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HE CENTER ON TUESDAY, MAY 26, 1987 RESOLUTION 52687-8.b REVISING THE SECONDARY HIGHWAY SYSTEM CONCERNING THE RELOCATION OF ROUTE 711 WHEREAS, Secondary Route 711 from Route 221 to 0.07 Mi. W. Route 221, a distance of 0.07 miles, has been altered, and a new road has been constructed and approved by the State Highway Commissioner, which new road serves the same citizens as the road so altered; and WHEREAS, certain sections of this new road follow new locations, these being shown on the attached sketch titled, "Changes in Secondary System Due to Relocation and Construction on Route 221, Project 0221, 080-106, PE-101 RW-201, C-501 dated at Richmond, Virginia March 26, 1986." NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the portion of Secondary Route 711, i.e. Section 2 shown in red on the sketch titled, "changes in Secondary System Due to Relocation and Construction on Route 221 Project 0221,080-106, PE-101, RW-201, C-501, dated at Richmond, Virginia March 26, 1986 a total distance of 0.07 miles be, and hereby is, added to the Secondary System of State Highways, pursuant to Section 33.1-229 of the code of Virginia as amended and FURTHER, that the section of old location, i.e., Section 1 shown in blue on the afore-mentioned sketch, a total distance of 0.07 miles, be, and the same hereby is, abandoned as a public road, pursuant to Section 33.1-155 of the Code of Virginia as amended. On motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by Supervisor Johnson and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None ABSENT: None A COPY - TESTE `~)2GC/1~~, ~~ - L Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors 5/27/87 CC: File John A. Peters, Assistant Director of Engineering John Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator Va. Department of Transportation A-52687-8.c ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 26, 1987 SUBJECT: Acceptance of Water lines serving Edinburgh Square COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR' SC,2O_MMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The developer of Edinburgh Square, Edinburgh Square Founda- tion, has requested that Roanoke County accept the deed conveying the water lines serving the development along with all necessary easements. The water lines are installed as shown on Engineering Plans prepared by Collins & Kronstadt entitled Edinburgh Square, dated March 15, 1985, which are on file in the Public Facilities Depart- ment. The water line construction meets the specifications and the plans approved by the county. FISCAL IMPACT: ~"' The value of the water construction is $14,500.00 RECOMMENDATION: The staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors accept the water facilities serving the subdivision along with all necessary easements, and authorize the County Administrator to execute a Deed for the transfer of these facilities. SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED: ~ L~i~x'w'r`' - ~~~''' Hod e Phill'p T. Henry P. E. Elmer C. g Engineering Director County Administrator ~, Approved (X> Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to cc: File Phillip Henry Clifford Craig John Hubbard ACTION Motion by: HCN/BLJ to approve VOTE No Yes Abs Brittle g Garrett X Johnson X McGraw g Nickens g J-~ NORTH ' n). - 9 I t Ac(D) 8.29 Ac (C ) ',a`1 _\ s DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC FACILITIES EDINBURGHt SQUARE A-52687-8.d ITEM NUMBER .,./'~" ..~ AT A REGUINIAMHELDNAT THEHROANOKE COUNTYEADMINISTRATIONNOCENTER COUNTY, VIRG MEETING DATE: May 26, 1987 SUBJECT: Acceptance of water and sewer facilities serving Kingston Court, Section 1 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The developer of Section 1, Ringston Court, Valley Developers, Inc., has requested that Roanoke County accept the deed conveying the water and sewer lines serving the subdivision along with all necessary easements. The water and sewer lines are 1Lumsdend&aAssociates engineering plans prepared by Buford T. 1986, which entitled, Section 1, Ringston Court dated March 27, are on file in the Public Facilities Department. The water and sewer line construction meets the specifications and the plans approved by the County. t-~ FISCAL IMPACT: ;~,`,`' The value of the water and sewer construction are $24,250.00 and $28,695.00 respectively. RECOMMENDATION: The staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors accept the water and sewer facilities serving the subdivision along with all necessary easements, and authorize the County Administrator to execute a Deed for the transfer of these facilities. 1 SUBMITTED BY: Phillip Henry Director of Engi Bering APPROVED: ~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ----------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved (X) Motion by: HCN/BLJ to approve No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Brittle X Received ( ) Garrett X Ref erred Johnson X to McGraw X Nickens X cc: File Phillip Henry Clifford Craig John Hubbard 2 PUBLICMFACICLITIES Seri. 1 KINGSTON COURT ~, W RECOMMENDATIONS: It has been recommended County Administrator for Public extension be approved. by Mr. John Hubbard, Assistant Facilities, that the sixty-day SUBMIT"rED BY: ~% /~~ D. K. Cook Director of Human Resources APPROVED: ~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator RESOLUTION: YES NO --------- ----------------- ------------------- VOTE ------------ ACTION Approved (X) Motion By: HCN/BLJ to approve Denied ( ) Received ( > Referred ( ) To cc: File Keith Cook John Hubbard Clifford Craig No Yes Abs Brittle X Garrett X Johnson X McGraw X Nickens X ~AN a( F, ~~~`' ~' ~, ~,. ~ ,~ ~ Z ~ ~~t~~~.~e ~~ ~ a= ~~~~~ 18 ~~ 88 SFSQUrceN7gNN~P~ DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES A Btauti~ul8eginning MEMORANDUM TO; Cliff Craig Utilities Director FROM: D. K. Cook :~~~ Director of Human Resources DATE: May 6, 1987 SUBJECT: Shirlee E Hill - Worker's Compensation Special Leave Shirlee Hill, Refuse Collector, sustained a job-related injury on January 16, 1987, and was granter3 a special leave of 90 work days which will end on Fridays May 22. Mr. Hill continues to have disability related to his injury and is unable to return to work at this time. an In accordance with Section VIII-C, Page 30, o th eBo~ard oaf Supervisors additional sixty work days may be approved by upon recommendation of both the department head and the county administrator. Please review the attached information and indicate your rndation on the bottom of thiforwaod thisamemodtolJohn Hubbard forshis recommended, please concurrence. The Department of Human Resources will proceed W estions recommended action upon return of thiPassefle .~I~Y~ have any qu regarding Mr. Hill s leave status, p js Attachment: Copy of Special Leave Request Copy of Employer's First Report ~R1~IDED ^ NOT RDC'OML'~I`IDID Cliff John R. board Asst. Adm. of Public Facilities Utilities Director *Since Mr. Hill's salary .will come out of the Refuse Budget, deposit the Workman's Compensation check in the Refuse Personnel Account 03-6-04200-0-10010. ~„ reduce two percent per month until it equals twenty-five per- ® cent of the original value. However, disability retirees' coverage does not begin reducing until age sixty-five. Both dismemberment and double indemnity coverage stops at retirement. Upon employment, a beneficiary must be chosen. The Personnel Office must be contacted after that if the beneficiary ublishes changed. The Virginia Supplemental Retirement System p a handbook which includes an explanation of the Group Life Insurance Plan. This may be obtained in the Personnel Office. C. Worker's Compensation In the event of an accident or illness while arov°.dedoatanoa result of work, all medical exlnnaddition tithe employee is en- cost to the County employee. titled to compensation eeshdopnotfsharehinlthe costaofsworker's unable to work. Employ compensation. The County pays the entire cost. In order to receive full compensation, accidents on the job must be report- ed to the employee's supervisor immediately. The employee must also complete the Report of Accident or Injury Foo siblehto Personnel Office. This must be done as soon as p enable the Personnel Office to file the claim within ten days of the accident and thus insure coverage. During the first seven calendar days that a regular employee is absent from work as awillube expectedetotuselaccruedosick,leave the regular employee A s ecial exception if he or she desires to receive full pay. P may be granted by the Board of Supervisors in the event of a serious on-the-job injury for those new regular employees who have not accrued sufficient sick leave. roc riateedepartmental be granted upon recommendation of the app P offi- superintendent, constitutional officer, or other Countto the cial. After the first theeregulardemployeeacouldrreceive-full next ninety work days, u on recommendation by pay for on-the-job injury or illness, p the appropriate departmental superintendent, constitutional officer or other County official, and the County Administrator. Upon recommendation of the appropriate departmental superinten- dent, constitutional officer or other County officiarantnuptto County Administrator, the Board of Supervisors may g an additional sixty work days in sPeloaeelmustnsign overoanyr to receive full pay, the regular emp y worker's compensation checks to tt~e County. At all times, the County reserves the right to designate the physician an employee must visit for examination to verify the extent of injury or illness. u 30 ~-~ / COUNTY OF ROp,NOKE, VIRGINIA RESERVE FOR BOARD CONTINGENCY $129,000 Original Budget 7-1-86 November 26, 1986 tired Count~vFmployees forlR (6,300) e December 16, 1986 Planning Conanission Travel (2,046) December 16, 1986 lization Board of Equa (4,000) January 13, 1987 Board of Supervisors and ~ag~nent Staff Planning/ Goal Setting Work Session (6,500) 1987 13 r Volunteers Training Seminar (2,500) , y Janua February 10, 1987 Roanoke Valley Constitution's (500) Bicentennial Commission February 24, 1987 icentennial Sesqu (10,000) March 24, 1987 Regional Airport Commission- (13.224) Survey April 7, 1987 Additional Insurance Pr~niums (45,000) April 28, 1987 Additional Detention Home Funds (8,000) Balance of Board Contingency at May 12, 1987 30 930 ~.____- Suhnitted by, ~~~ ~- ~~ Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance L- COUI~YI'Y OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA UNAPPROPRIATED BALANCE Original Budget July 1, 1986 $1,584,637 February 10, 1987 Interest Expense for 000) (100 Short-Term Borrowing , April 7, 1987 West County Water Reservoir (310,000) April 7, 1987 Transfer to Schools of Unused 1985-86 Budget (65,128) Reserved for 1987-88 budget (100,000) $1.0_ Unappropriated Balance at May 12, 1987 The recormiendedent of the total generalffund9budgetis $1,502,287 which is 3 pe Submitted by, Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance ~` COUNTY OF ROANOKE STATEMENT OF EXPENDITURES MONTH ENDED APRIL 30, 1987 - BUDGET ----------- - EXPENDED ----------- --- x --------- GENERAL ADMINISTRATION 8 748 8 100 75,610 75 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS , 616 260 214,280 82 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR , 143 195 157,251 81 PERSONNEL , 396 121 101,226 83 COUNTY ATTORNEY COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE , 514,696 425,948 83 TREASURER 407,739 285,377 70 ELECTIONS 120,102 95,468 79 SESQUICENTENNIAL 10,000 4,168 FISCAL MANAGEMENT SUPERINTENDENT OF FISCAL MANAGEMENT COUNTY ASSESSOR 531,513 398,507 75 71 CENTRAL ACCOUNTING 350,592 249,779 82 PROCUREMENT 191,513 156,255 MANAGEMENT & BUDGET 63,237 43,214 68 JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION 801 91 10,893 12 CIRCUI? COURT , 145 21 8,672 41 GENERAL DISTRICT COURT , 407 56 MAGISTRATES 730 546 6 4,578 70 J & D DISTRICT COURT , 823 446 325,917 73 CLERK OF CIRCUIT COURT ' , 952 276 216,006 78 S ATTORNEY COMMONWEALTH , 825 41 32,651 78 PROBATION OFFICE , PUBLIC SAFETY POLICING & INVESTIGATING 3,453,082 2,688,860 78 HIGHWAY SAFETY COMMISSION 960 171 18 83 FIRE 1,697,075 1,403,279 RESCUE SQUAD 458,988 361,717 79 84 EMERGENCY SERVICES 36,358 30,636 80 CONFINEMENT/CARE OF PRISONERS 1,801,663 1,446,380 60 ANIMAL CONTROL 1.47,902 118,356 PUBLIC FACILITIES SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC FACILITIES 218,762 130,876 60 STREET LIGHTS 110,845 73,843 67 62 ENGINEERING 04,683 127,034 BUILDINGS & GROUNDS 1,554,788 1,037,968 67 70 PARKS & RECREATION 981,154 688,969 36 DRAINAGE 175,079 62,170 REFUSE 1,354,159 936,694 69 PARK DEVELOPMENT 13,486 42,665 316 49 PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION 168,709 83,453 °~w- "~ COUNTY OF ROANOKE STATEMENT OF EXPENDITURES MONTH ENDED APRIL 30, 198 7 HEALTH & SOCIAL SERVICES 359,693 269,770 75 PUBLIC HEALTH SOCIAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION 1,689,870 1,282,047 76 62 PUBLIC ASSISTANCE 893,986 554,131 198 6 12 INSTITUTIONAL CARE 51,500 984 94 , 94,984 100 SOCIAL SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS , DEVELOPMENT SUPERINTENDENT OF DEVELOPMENT 97,334 80,295 82 79 PLANNING & ZONING 233,197 731 81 184,208 65,859 81 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT , 184 95 76,980 81 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW , 581 19 15,338 78 PLANNING COMMISSION , 911 196 166,115 84 CONSTRUCTION BUILDING SERVICES , NON-DEPARTMENTAL LIBRARY EXTENSION & CONTINUING EDUCATION EMPLOYEE BENEFITS INSURANCE CONTRIBUTIONS TO SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS FLOOD DISASTER EXPENSE MISCELLANEOUS TOTAL TRANSFERS REIMBURSABLE EXPENDITURES DEBT SERVICE TRANSFER TO INTERNAL SERVICE TRANSFER TO SCHOOL OPERATING FUND TRANSFER TO UTILITY CAPITAL CAPITAL PROJECTS TRANSFER RESERVE FOR BOARD CONTINGENCY UNAPPROPRIATED BALANCE TRANSFER TO YOUTH HAVEN TRANSFER TO GRANT FUND TOTAL TRANSFER ITEMS GRAND TC~AL 1,009,412 815,739 B1 89,700 42,963 48 637,006 363,992 57 687,082 667,675 97 24,600 24,600 100 0 17,305 784,178 303,520 39 23,247,450 17,129,956 74 ----------- ------------ ---------- 0 3,719 2,174,544 2,230,556 103 127,423 0 0 24,731,128 15,619,586 63 625,195 0 0 2,415,734 534,163 22 30,930 0 1,109,509 0 0 96,356 0 0 35 0 -- -- 0 ------- ------------ 31,310,854 ------------ ---------- 18,388,024 ------------ -- 59 --------- S 54,558,304 8 35,517,980 65 1 1 i N O ~.l7 a0 m .--1 O h r-1 ~~ m O O M .p ~O N N E r~„1 C~~Y ~O X 0 0 ~ M 1 W W 1 N N .O ~G .O ~ O O+ O+ C~ O af' u7 sf' O M O ~ ~ r1 ~ m 1!'1 ul O 1 .-1 1 II I 6 d~ 1 m ~!' .O O+ ~ n~ y M N N a~f1 X0-1 `O N N~~ m~ v r1 v h N 1 h 1 T 01 v 1 ~ p~~ 1 C>D v ~ 1 d' a m 1 1 1 1 ~ 7 1 1 O 1 N 1 ~ 'ti 1 * * t « 4 1 0 1 * + V 1 1 N O ..r'f <Y N O+ O M ^"'I m~ GO O+ O h M .D N O~ .-1 .D G71 O O~ O O 1 10f1 W I A O ~p N N ~O O ~, N ~O 1!1 m [~ O V' M ~O ~G O O ~ N O 1 W fJ] 1 h O .O Iv1 cO~1 m N 0 O~ QI ~ V' C • ~ .-+ ~D a0 O m ~.-1 1A O O 1 m pa 1 N 'f. S a ; ~ W p i ~ ~"1 Q~ sf' M C~~ N N Mh--1 O N ~!' N N M r-1 rM-1 !~ ~ ""1 h h N ; d. M ~ 1 ~O h O W r+ CO d' M '"1 1 dl 1 i O O~ 1 N O .-1 M N N 1 1 ~ 1 N ~D h Q' C") cD CO at' III [~ M d C N~ O [_ c0 aD ~G O~ V~ O O 1 h II 1 M tl 1 M 11 I 11 1 .--1 11 1 (~ 11 I 11 1 11 1 11 1 II 1 11 ~ ~ ~ ~ « # t 1 II /1 O O ~ ~ 1~ m o O c 1 `C 11 u t O+ 11 I N 11 ~, O 1 ~O 11 I ~ tl 1 LA II 1 11 V! 1 11 1 [~ 11 1 d. II I II 1 11 1 O O M O 1 N ~ 1 ~ I >N 1 1.f1 .-a O~ h CO N ~fJ Jl m O O O CV C'~ CD C~ ~ 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 ~ 1!1 .G Gf O m 0~ 0 1 I/1 1 1 I .--1 h M h .D a' aD O 'V" N .~-I H rn .p .O 1!'1 .--1 a0 .G O+ N m N ~ 1 O 1 1 ~O O~ O h O~ M O m V~ h .-1 V' M~ .D h d+ h m~ 1f1 m M .-1 W M ~O I M 1 ~ 1 d ~--1 M L.n ~D ~ ` I 1 J h S N VI sY O Of r+ `~ 1 O 1 6 ml .Fy 1 O~ ~ d' ~ Ihfl ~ ~O .~-1 N •O N N .O .D N ahD ~ r-1 O O m ~O m N 1 1f'1 1 .7 1 •O m 10 h N r..l r-/ ~ ~"1 `"1 ~ r1 e-•1 e-1 .--1 ~-1 ~ I11 1 H O O r.1 1 V M Z 1 VI N O h T rl u'1 N h 1 ~ 1 1 ' ` 1 N 1 v~l r1 r-1 N ~-i "", 1 m 1 '~ O~ 1 ry 1 1 1 ~Q 1 ~ m I ~ p~ I r1 O 00 C 1 Of ~ 1 , 1 O O O O O O O O o ~ 0 ~ 0 0 0 0~ ~ N O O 1 O~ 1 j ~ N 0 0 0 O N O O O O O O ~~~ M O~~~ ~~ 0 0 ~~ F ~ W 1 ~O Q~ M N 0p N O M N O h~ N N VOi N .~-~ Of .-1 r1 m~ Nh9 v'f N ~ ~' ~ ~ 1 h~ O O~ M O~ V' M N r"1 1 Vim' ~ iY•1 1 e--1 O1 '"1 M N N 1 1 1 N 1 1 N V1 1l1 [~ O N O 1 O 1 O m ~ ~ 1 ~ 1 O d O M m dl 10 VI h .-+ m Of ~O N Of h h [~ O Of 1 1 N 1 IA ra O aD m N dl .--1 .-1 r-1 1 1 , 1 1 1 t 1 1 1n O ~ O 1 ~ 1 r1 eM h N ch O M 1A m K1 N M ~C O VI 1 i v-I N r-1 C7 m M m m~ M N a0 m~ CO+ n .-+ t~ 1 O~ 1 N i r~-1 1~l1 ~ M ~ /ff O ~ 00+ e+OY ~ n .OD .O r-1 O1 11'f O h ~ i m i J .G %~ M O O h A N O N a 1 h 1 .~ m H 1 m M Of l~ m .--1 1/'f ~ .~ h Of Of m atl .h-+ O N 11'1 M , N'f 1 H O O 1 .O-1 .O ~ ~ m N ,O '.'~ ri N .~-1 VI m ~ W .-+ .-+ ~ .•+ ~ ~"~ 1 1 h e~-1 O 1 M 1 V M s ~ ~ ~ ~--I 1 N 1 ; C .-1 .- 1 N ~ / 1 ` ~ O 1 rl , v 1 1 ~ 1 Of ~ 1 m ~ N 1 ~ Of ~ aD ~ N ,O N~ t+ ~D Of ~D .h'/ m M h h M iM h M O N M N ~ ~ 1 J ~O 'S 1 M m N V' ~ ~ r.l .-1 ~/ M 1C Of ~ ~p .-i 1 O~ 1 !~ m H 1 I.rf .-1 Cf N O r1 M eh m h m eN VI M 1 d' 1 ~ G O I O 1 Z j p.l sN ~ O .~ O M N N M m rl ~ vl ~' N N Of r-1 .--1 .O .-/ N r-1 M ~' t .D Z ~ N 1 d' W W ~ ~ ` 10 N 1 .--1 h r-1 M e-1 r-1 1 p --~ V' 01 1 v I N Z Cf] M ~ 1 ~ 1 1 1 O rH-1 H O O O O O~ M 0 0 0 1 ~ •Z p6pq~ 1 1 O 0 0 0 0 O~ O O O M 1011 O L~ V' O O 1011 O O O !+Y m v~'f N V~D ~ m W 6 W 1 1 O 1 f1 O O O •--1 O O O ~ ~ ~~ N .-1 O 1 M O F•1 rl O O l~ H O J 1 C+7 i O N .N-1 N .Oif [~ VN,1 c+h~ N N M O ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ .~-1 t~ .-+ c~i1 c') m .-1 i tr 1 ~ Z V 6 ~ ~j 1 1ff M O O~ O m ~ N ^'1 1 ~' p rz-1 Fail_ 1 m 1 .-/ aD '-1 M N ~ 1 V '4f7i ~ 1 N C.7 1 1 W N CfJ W W .~ o. ~ tNWl7 W N P. Z i!7 W O N ~ ~ W W W A ? x H Z ~ wa W a W ~ w a y W cry a o ~ v EO-+ cn ac cn o ,~., x O YC U] W M O '-. O 6~ H GZa7 E-1 A. H N k W W W a a to W O X ~dN.. J >+ Z d m 0 CWI~ [FJJ L>. ['`~ y y a (ay7 a 0 W Z OHC. V H y~ rH-I W W a V [11 H W W [J7 6 4 W~ W a O W LI,1 fy Z c!) O F .-7 Z 06 a H O O N+ 6 Ox a co W www`npO3C~c~e'6-Iwwa w~adv~vocnwsa6•.:scnaos wyaW ~""'jp6ww 06 P. p1. H~ WA "~ G c.9 --I W W a Z W~ t°n 6 c a A~ y cF.~ 1 1 ~ Cl7 Z a H Z a W W LNi.1 a O W~ a= 6 W a W O `, w ccr#ac~.lww..ow ~,xZ,~.svvsw~ewJaHo~x+.°apa O 6 6 F! O~ H 0 0 0 H 1'-1 4 S W m O S O a W a H H O to LIO 6 0 A N [D O W c!! V a 6 V tf] V H S .-7 O W J: F C4 1 11 O O O ~ ~ ~~ I .~ u u 1 M 11 1 O1 11 1 ~ 11 11 1 ~ I I 1 N 11 1 11 d/ 1 ~~ 1!1 O O j G 11 cm7 O 1 M 11 11 M O I m 11 1 1f'1 11 r-1 O 1 Iff 11 I 11 1 1!'1 11 1 It 1 11 O O d' 1 ~ 11 1 M 11 1 11 1 11 1 11 1 .y II O O C 1 ~ 11 0 1 0= ii 1 0 1 m ii M 1 m 11 1 ' N 11 u 1 11 0 ~ p i ~ li M O 1 u'` ~ ~ .-+ of i o+ n al M 1 N 11 ~ 1 ~ 11 1 11 m 1 4A 11 u Qt 1 11 m O O 1 L!1 11 h ~p O 1 m 11 O~ M O 1 ~ 11 1 O ~-d Qf 1 1!1 11 ~p sT' M 1 M 11 N O ~ ~ C 11 ~. ~ m 1 e-1 11 ~Q 11 11 Gry A W VW O a a W W v cn 6 .d ^C m a D 0 O+ O H y ~ N y w o 0 o J W w F ~ c WO Oa Oa w W z°acn 1~ to 6 A Z F a W Z U] O W c~ v s °a m H d. sR Z O ~C H W Z O V V I-r v7 6 O O H 0 W A 6 Z O_ H s w A .-+ O V J 6 H v W L1. ,. ~ ITEM NUMBER / r ~ / AT A REGULAR MEETINAT THEHROANOKE COUNTYEADMINISTRATIONNOENTER COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD IN ROANOKE, VA., ON TUESDAY, MEETING DATE: May 26, 1987 SUB_ JECT: Ordinance amending Section Code to increase the annual cles 12-28 of the Roanoke County license tax on motor vehi- COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS/~'~ .// ~4~ ~~ ~ 'D ~~/ n~1 SUMMARY OF INFORMATION : ~,~ ~~,, g7 the Board indicated its intention to in~ On April 28, 19 , crease the County vehicle d flowsi to he General Fund,$thetstated Although these funds woul purpose for this incr bl c wheat ng done thish proposed ~nc tease ags in the County. A Pu ro osed scheduled for May 26, 1987. The fi1987readang hen secondpreading ordinance is scheduled for May 26, is set for June 9, 1987.. This proposed ordinance amends Section 12-28 of the Roanoke County Code. It inc hicles;t howeveruaitlsubstant ial y oincreases $20 for most motor ve this tax for trucks. the etruck~s butlnine mostf ocases c is no Lathe upon the weight of maximum authorized under state law. This proposed ordinance also establishes certain exceptions from the annual license tdxsabledrveterans~f It provides nforoa the Medal of Honor, and reduced tax for members of the National Guard. The effective date of this proposed ordinance is July 1, 1987. Any revenue derived from this roc osede ordinan~e hasabeen ally received until May 1988. This p p reviewed by the Co 1 lfeesn amo g theRareau locadl t es ris sattached comparison of deca for your review. FISCAL IMPACT: It is anticipated that this increase in annual license tax will generate approximately $200,000 if automobile fees are increased or $260,000 if all fees are increased as shown on the attached schedule. /~/-~ 1 RECOMMENDATION: At the Board's request, this ordinance is submitted to the Board for its consideration. Respectfully submitted, . ~~, Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney ------- ----------------- ---- VOTE ACTION No Yes Abs Approved ( ) Motion by: ~ Brittle Denied ( ) Garrett Received ( ) Johnson Referred McGraw To Nickens AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THTHE ROANOKESCOUNTYSADMINISTRATION COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT 1987 CENTER, ON TUESDAY, MAY 26, °~ ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 12-28 OF THE ROANOKEL CENSEY TARO ON MOTOR VEH CLESTHE ANNUAL BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That Section 12-28 of the Roanoke County Code en- titled "Levy and amount of tax; special provisions for antique vehicles." be amended to read and provide as follows: Lev and amount of tax; special provisions for Sec. 12-28. Y antique vehicles; exceptions. (a) There is hereby levied an annual license tax on every motor vehicle, trailer and mo rir of esuch gtaxe shallbbelas censed under this article•subsections of this section. set forth in the following (b) On every motor vehicle not taxed under other sub- sections of this section, there shall be a tax of f}€teen 20.00) per annum, except that the twent dollars {$}5-8A} ($ _- ..,.,+-.~rrvnl P_S shall be f n dollars ($15.00 ) per annum. vun .. - here shall be a tax per (c) On each truc k ri t according to th o schedule: e foll g annum Gross Vehicle Truck Trailer Weight in Pounds 1,500 or less $}5-8A $2_ }5:8A 20.00 $ 6.50 15.00 1,501 to 4,000 500 1 to 6 2A-8A 25.00 20,00 20,00 , 4,00 6,501 to 10,000 25:9A 30.00 35-AA 40.00 20,00 10,001 to 20,000 45-AA 60.00 20,00 20,001 to 30,000 -gg 70.00 55 20,00 30,001 to 40,000 . 65:A8 80.00 20,00 40,000 and over x for a trailer desig t t y($6 50)ansport boats a The shall not exceed six and f fty cen dollars . of an "antique motor vehicle," as de- (d) The d licensed owner in title 46.1 of the Cod fil ng an1aPplay on fined an secure a local license or decal at no charaemept of a five dollar cation for same wit d the h a ment eofuthe ppropriate y personal property ($5.00) fee an p /~- taxes. This application shall remain valid so long as the vehi- cle is titled to the applicant. y~-1 PS are hereby (e) The followin owners of motor veh' exem t from the anne~sonlawardedathe MedalnofaHonodlsandrana dis- soner of war an abled veteran. An member se oredecal lu lon the o a ment oa ahfee be entitled to a local licen in the amount of one-half of the tax rescribed in this section. These exem tions shall be limited to an one assen er vehicle icku or anel t ue shall ddeterminel e li i b 1 t n. based commissioner of the reven u on the criteria util~hed~ommonwealthl ofl V it nia hfoDethetmssu- of Motor Vehicles of ance of s ecial license icenses or decd to ownersleligibbe unde~ rized to issue a local 1 this sub-section. 2. July 1, 1987. The effective date of this amendment shall be /~-1 COUI~I'Y OF ROANOKE COMPARISON OF DECAL FEES AMONG AREA LOCALITIES MAY 26, 1987 Descri tp ion Nbtor Vehicles: Less than 4,000 lbs. Greater than 4,000 lbs. Nbtorcycles: City of Roanoke $15.00 20.00 8.00 Current City of County of Salem Roanoke $10.00 $15.00 8.00 15.00 Trucks (Gross Vehicle Weight in Pounds): 1,500 or less 1,501 - 4,000 4,001 - 6,500 6,501 - 10,000 6,501 - 11,500 10,001 - 15,499 10,001 - 20,000 15,500 - 20,000 20,001 - 30,000 30,001 - 40,000 40,001 and over 20.00 20.00 20.00 22.00 23.00-37.00 38.80-62.00 66.00 66.00 66.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 12.00-16.00 20.00 15.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 28.00 40.00 50.00 60.00 20.00 20.00 25.00 30.00 Trailers: Boat Trailers 1,500 or less 1,501 - 4,000 4,001 and over 1,000 or less 1,001 - 5,000 5,001 and over 35.00 45.00 55.00 65.00 Proposed Increase County of Roanoke $20.00 15.00 40.00 60.00 70.00 80.00 6.50 6.50 6.50 50 6 6.50 15.00 . 00 15 15.00 17.00 . 20.00 20.00 22.00 1.50 3.00 6.00 ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE ANOKE oOUNTYEADMINISTRATIONNCENTER COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROA• ON TUESDAY, IN ROANOKE, , MEETING DATE: May 26, 1987 SUB_ J_ E_ Acquisition of Easements 1987/88 Replacement/Improvement Water Projects COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: 1987/88 In order to successfully come lts e tClearbrook nWater II, replacement/improvement water proj North Lakes Water System, Glen Forest Water Project, Geiser Road/Grander, Wendover Drive, WeSacruisition f easements across it is necessary to authorize r h ert gowners. the real estate of adjacent p p Y The proposed ordinance authorizes the County Administratbe to execute such docume thesenaransactions.a The fi st read rig of necessary to accomplish 1987; the second read- the proposed ordinance was held on May 26, ing is scheduled for June 9, 1987. FISCAL IMPACT The costs for these projects shall be paid from the Utility Depreciation Account. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that thet Ba hed ordnance.consider this proposal by the adoption of the a Respectfully submitted, i ~ ~^: Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney ~~ ~. -------------------- VOTE ------------------- ACTION No Yes Abs Approved ( ) Motion by: Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred To _,_- Brittle Garrett Johnson McGraw Nickens '~ ~- ~' .~___, AT A REGULAR MEETING DFATHTHEOROANOKESCOUNTYSADMINISTRATOON COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HEL MAY 26 1987 CENTER, ON TUESDAY, ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION OF EASEMENTS FOR 1987/88 REPLACEMENT/ IMPROVEMENT WATER PROJECTS BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading concerning the acquisition of easements for Clearbrook Water II, North Lakes Water System, Glen Forest Water Project, Geiser Road/Grander, Wendover Drive, Western Hills, and Woodland Drive water projects was held on May 26, 1987. A second reading on this matter was held on June 9, 1987• 2. That these easements are necessary to complete the above-referenced 1987/88 Replacement/Improvements Water Projects. These projects will provide necessary utility service to the citi- zens of Roanoke County. 3. That the County Administrator is authorized to exe- cute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County as are necessary to accomplish the acquisitions of said property, all of which shall be upon form approved by the County Attorney. ITEM NUMBER / 7 "" AT A REGULAR MEETING OTHEHROANOKE OCOUNTYEADMINISTRATIONNCENTER COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT VA. ON TUESDAY, IN ROANOKE, , MEETING DATE: May 26, 1987 SUBJECT: Ordinance to increase f eRoanoke eCounty empursuant tto ~- Board of Supervisor Section 14.1-46.01:1 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR' S COMME~ S ~ rJ~ ~ iJ ~"'l4~ " `~~ c~ ,~ rc'.~i .~~° a,~ /u.R ~~ ~t ~~-~9~tz~brn . ~73''~ SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Last year on May 27, 1986, the Board adopted an ordinance to increase its salaries pursuania ° Thisrsection soffthecStatelCode 46.01:1 of the Code of Virgin increase in and Section 3.07 of the Charter require that any ublic supervisor's salaries be accomplished binc ease nis li itedpto an hearing between May 1 and June 30. Any annual five (50) percent inflation factor. The first reading of this proposed ordinance is scheduled includes the evening meet- for May 26, 1987. Since this meeting I would suggest that this ing for public hearings on rezonings, uirement. The reading could also satisfy the public hearing req second reading of this proposed ordinance is scheduled for June 9, 1987. The proposed salary forionard h smbsrdinanceb establishesfthe $7607 to $7987. In addit , annual compensation for the Chairman of the Board at $1800 an Vice Chairman at $1200. FISCAL IMPACT: Five (5%) percent increase in Board salaries-- ($380 each x 5 = $1900). RECOMMENDATION: None. Respectfully submitted, ~.~ ~,`'~n ' '1N~ Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney --------------------------------------------- VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred To ACTION No Yes Abs Brittle Garrett Johnson McGraw Nickens AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGICENTERELONATUESDAYOAMAYE26OU1987ADMINISTRATIO\N,~_ ~Y ORDINANCE TO INCREASE THE SALARIES OF MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, PURSUANT TO SECTION 14.1-46.01:1 WHEREAS, Section 14.1-46.01:1 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, establishes the annual salaries of members of boards of supervisors within certain population brackets; and WHEREAS, Section 3.07 of the Charter for the County of Roanoke provides for the compensation of members of the board of supervisors, and the procedure for increasing their salaries; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, has heretofore established the annual salaries of Board members to be $7607 by Ordinance #5-27-86-124, and further, has established the additional annual compensation for the Chairman of the Board to be $1800, and for the Vice Chairman of the Board to be $1200; and WHEREAS, this section provides that the maximum annual salaries therein provided may be adjusted in any year by an infla- tion factor not to exceed five (5%) percent; and WHEREAS, the first reading on this ordinance was held on May 26, 1987; the second reading was held on June 9, 1987. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that the annual salaries of members of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, are hereby increased by an inflation factor of five (50) percent pursuant to the provisions of Section 14.1-46.01:1 ~- of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended. The new annual sal- aries shall be $7987 for members of the Board. In addition, the Chairman of the Board will receive an additional annual sum of $1800 and the Vice Chairman of the Board will receive an addition- al annual sum of $1200. This ordinance shall take effect on July 1, 1987. ~~~ .~ ~~- . ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THEOANOKE OCOUNTYEADMINISTRATIONNOCENTER COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE RVA.~ ON TUESDAY, IN ROANOKE, MEETING DATE: May 26, 1987 Vacation and Relocation of a portion of a water line SUBS easement - Ozanich Property COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~ ~ ~`'Gy~ /~ s~ ~~ ~~ SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Wayne E. and Rebecca A. Ozanich, the property owners of Lot g, Block EE, Section 9, PennchoWater line neare the intersection tion of a section of a 10 in of Flamingo Drive and Oriole Lane. The roe le ~yio To accomplish Mr. Ozanich to construct a garage on his p P roximately 100 feet of the present water line this request, apP ro ert needs to be vacated and easement running through their p P Y a new easement. Section relocated. This will require obtaining uisition of real 18.04 of the COnterestathereingberaccomplishedaogly by ordinance. estate or any The proposed ordinance authorizes the County Admibesnecesr to execute such documents and take such actions as may of the nary to accomplish these eld on May n26, 1987f1the secondgreading proposed ordinance was h 1987. is scheduled for June 9, FISCAL IMPACT : p~J~ Property owner is paying for the cost of relocation. RECOMMENDATION: It proposal is recommended that the Board favorably by the adoption of the attached ordinance. consider this Respectfully submitted, ~~~ Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney ---------------------------------------------- VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: Denied l Received ( ) Referred To ACTION Brittle Garrett Johnson McGraw Nickens No Yes Abs AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOAROANOKESCOUNTYSADMINISTRATOION COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE MAY 26, 1987 CENTER, ON TUESDAY , ~""~' .~ ~~ ORDINANCE TIONOOFZA PORTIONAOFTA WATER AND RELOCA LINE EASEMENT, OZANICH PROPERTY BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke Virginia, as follows: County, rovisions of Section 18.04 of 1, That pursuant to the p concerning the the Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading tion and relocation of a portion of a water line easement on vaca Ozanich Property was held on May 26, 1987. A second rea ing the on this matter was held on June 9, 1987; and ortion of the present 2, That the vacation of a P nt and the acquisition of another easement is necessary for easeme the relocation of a 10-inch water line; and is authorized to That the County Administrator 3. e such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke execut as are necessary to accomplish the vacation and County on form acquisition of said property, all of which shall be up approved by the County Attorney. ITEM NUMBER A ~ °' AT A REGULAR MEETING OTHEHROANOKE OOUN'rYEADMINISTRATIONNOCENTER COUNTY, VIRGINIA HINDROANOKE, VA., ON TUESDAY, MEETING DATE: May 26, 1987 SUB,~._.. Ordinance authori orndedication ofyut 1ntYlandar~ghto accept the donation of-way road easements and improvements therein COUNTY ADMINISTRATO-R~'S~, C®OMMENTS SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Section 18.04 of the Roanookan COinterestathe e n beraccompt the acquisition of real estate Y lished only by ordinance. The adoption of an ordinance requires two readings. The acquisition of rsialtm ttersntsParn o~1g°t tie County generally non-controve the Board routinely accepted such donations or Charter, dedications by resolutionsoof at least one monthdoccur complying charter provisions, delay with the new procedure. The purpose of this proposed ordinance is to expedite the acceptance procedure. This ordinance will authorize the County Administrator to accept dedications of utility easements and rights-of-way upon the reviencurrencecof the Board of Supervisors engineering staff and the co eneral authorizing by resolution. This proposed ordinance is a g ordinance satisfying the regocesseritTheffirstcreadingbof this streamlining the acceptance p 26, 1987; the second read- proposed ordinance is scheduled for May ing is scheduled for June 9, 1987. FISCAL IMPACT: None. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the tacked ordinance consider this d tion of the at proposal by the a op Respectfully submitted, 1" - Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney __ -------------------- VOTE ACTION No Yes Abs p,pproved ( ) Motion by: Denied ( ~ Received ( ) Referred To Brittle Garrett Johnson McGraw Nickens AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOAOANOKESCOUNTYSADMINISTRATION COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE R 1987 CENTER, ON TUESDAY, 1~iAY 26, ~_. ORD INAIVCE AUTHORI T THE DONATIOON OR ADMINISTRATOR TO ACCEP DEDICATION OF UTILITY AND RIGHT-OF-WAY ROAD EASEMENTS AND IMPROVEMENTS THEREIN WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of he Charter of Roanoke County, first and second readings are t required to pass all ordinances; and WHEREAS, the County routinely acquires utility and -of-way road easements for various County engineering and right rivate developments; and utility projects and for p WHEREAS, it is the intent of this ordinance to provide rocedure to review, approve, for an orderly and expeditious p rize, and accept the donation or dedication of such autho interests in real estate. the Board of NOtN', THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia as follows: 1. That upon the proposed donation or dedication of a for road purposes, and any utility easement or a right-of-way the County improvements or facilities constructed therein' nation or t said do Administrator is hereby authorized to accep dication, upon the review and recommendation of the County de 'neer, or his designee, and upon the concurrence of the Board engl of Supervisors by resolution. 2, That the County Administrator is authorized to to such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke execu unt as are necessary to accomplish the acquisition of these Co Y the County easements, all of which shall be upon form approved by r ~ '"` Attorney. The County Administrator may delegate this authority as he deems appropriate. 3• The effective date of this amendment shall be June 9, 1987• ITEM NUMBER ~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BO ER COUNTY A MINISOTRATOIONROCENTER COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROAANO ON TUESDAY, IN ROANOKE, , MEETING DATE: May 26, 1987 Ordinance authorizing the purchase of SUB_ J_ ECT a Water Storage Reservoir Site COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~"4"~~~ SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: These The Utility Department has w termstorageereservo~rsof sites for the construction of future stems that they sites are located at certain oneslofdtheewatern sywhich have een established by the pressure z will be a part of. urchase one of the sites, a 100-foot by Staff proposes to p _ 00-foot parcel with a 25-foot rigtt ownedybywDoug Sawyeratestaff 1 ro er The Sugar Loaf Mountain Rchasen price of $5,000 for this the .County has negotiated a p purchase price for this site has been rei eW to be reasonable. Assessor's OfficethedCounty Charter requires that the acquisition Section 18.04 of interest therein be accomplished only by of real estate or any ordinance. The proposed ordinance authorizes the County AdmibeBnecesr to execute such documents and take such The first Breading of the sary to accomplish this transaction. 26 1987; the second read- proposed ordinance will be he1987n May , ing is scheduled for June 9, FISCAL IMPACT: u rice of $5,000 for this site is compoeneng The purchase P aid by Mr. Sawyer and an adj off-set by the water fees p installed water main. property owner for connection touareacently No appropriation of funds is req RECOMMENDATION: urchase of Staff recommends that the Board authorize otreate staff be this parcel of land and fur uhe edt documents pto effect this pur- authorized to execute the req chase. APPROVED: SUBMITTED BY: ~~~ Elmer C. Hodge Cliff raig County Administrator Director of Utilities --------------------------------- VOTE ------------------ ACTION No Yes Abs p,pproved ( ) Motion by: Brittle t Denied ( ) Garret Received ( ) Johnson Referred McGraw Nickens To __ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION ~ Y CENTER, ON TUESDAY, MAY 26, 1987 ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE PURCHASE OF WATER STORAGE RESERVOIR SITE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading concerning the purchase of a 100-foot by 100-foot parcel with a 25-foot right-of- way for a water storage reservoir site was held on May 26, 1987. A second reading on this matter was held on June 9,1 987. 2. That the acquisition of said property is necessary for the construction of a water storage reservoir; and 3. That this property be acquired from Doug Sawyer in the amount of $5,000; and 4. That the County Administrator is authorized to exe- cute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County as are necessary to accomplish this transaction, all of which shall be upon form approved by the County Attorney. r{~~^V~l~~ TIC"~~~.5 - `_ _ ~ ,ter: ~ ~ ~ / ~fP~L I_ tt ^~ ~~,Ah[ C:r S~ 1'EhVIS'+EtS a 7~ si ~~ A> 1 T L t T ;_ ~i S ~r ' ^, C 4 i? l `3 F; ~~,I LtC ~ J ;= S7ATr.: t: E= VI~GI"•lI1=+ AFE-ID~,'diT ~F. PU?L ICATIC`I I t (Tt{ U;JC ~I. SI v Jt EMI N. {IC~~ i~~,F~ ~,,F 1 I'°' L S-'v: JF Li' C'~h ~t, f. C, T i _ . , I.w. N~~h ~;T It~~ IS +'.-±E~~I Sr1F=F Cif TE-i~ 3?OAP'uK T t;,LS £'. :v;i~.L(;- 1`~'.kSt fi C; .ILY i~;~~Si~APC,~ ?.!E~1ISti~C- I*V i.~i`~~kCKE, Ind TH``- STATE ~~ ~ • ~ r _ ~;EhTIfY Tri,'?T TEIE A~dt`1~XED J I~ GI~l.~t ~' n ~r r~ ~~E'~vSPAPEkS ~.JT" IC.I~ YEAS ~.!'_'~L IS!i~ ~l .d ~~;,~? ~,)~119/S '~ f PUBLIC NOTICE ~~ THI` ~~.+.ITii ~~,Y C~,~= P"AY 1. ,37 of `t I T . , F S S f ~ ~ ~- ~~ PROPOSED INCREASE QF VEHICLE LICENSE TAX '/ please be adviwd that the - --___'_ __-_,_-- Board of SuDSrvisors of ~'~,+__ Roanoke County, Virplnla,-et r r ~ Its meetln0 on MeY ~, 19l7, at (? ~ ~ I ~ L h• f S J ' ~ ` ~ T ~ ~ ~ the Roanoke County Adl+(IR~r tratlon Canter, 3731 @ramhN- ton Avenue, Roanoke, VIr4M• la, et 7:00 P.m. or ss soon fhenstter as the matter rl(sy be Mard, will hold a Dubuc hearlnD end first reading on the followin0 matter, to-wlf: ORDINANCE AMENDIN4 ~ SECTION 1Y-2t OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE OF INCREASE THE , ANNUAL LICENSE TAX ON MOTOR VEHICLES All members of the Dubuc Infer- ested in this metier may ap• pear and be hesrd of the time end Dlaee sforesald. Paul M. Mshoney , County Attorney (17536) ~~ PUBLIC NOTICE OF PROPOSID INCREASE OF VET-IICLE LICENSE TAX Please be advised that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke Coun Virginia, at its meeting on May 26, 1987, at the Roanoke County Administral Center, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, Roanoke, Virginia, at 7:00 p.m. or as thereafter as the matter may be heard, will hold a public hearing and fi reading on the following matter, to-wit: ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 12-28 OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE TO INCREASE THE ANNUAL LICQVSE TAX ON N~'IipR VEIiICLES All members of the public interested in this matter may appear and heard at the time and place aforesaid. ~,. ~ ~~U1 ~ 'Y'~ Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney Please publish on the following dates in the morning edition: May 12, 1987 May 19, 1987 Please send the invoice to: Board of Supervisors P• O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 ITEM NUMBER Q AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANO. COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENT: IN ROANOKE, VA., ON TUESDAY, MEETING DATE: May 26, 1987 SUBJECT: Ordinance amending Chapter Miscellaneous," Sections 13 and County Code concerning unlawful materials and unlawful accumulation COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~~ SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: 13, "Offense; 14 of the Roanol disposal of wasl s of trash and wee< A recent court case brought to Roanoke County General Dis trict Court in the Hollins Magisterial District revealed certai weaknesses in several sections of the Roanoke County Code. I order to provide General District and Circuit Court Judges with streamlined, more enforceable code relating to the these sec tions, the Roanoke County Commonwealth's Attorney requested tha certain amendments be approved which will provide for a greate likelihood of property cleanup or convictions and fines as judi cially determined. The first reading of an amending ordinance was held May 12 1987; the second reading is scheduled for May 26, 1987. FISCAL IMPACT: ~~`~ A more efficient expenditure of zoning staff time in court No additional County funding required now or in the future. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors favorably consider this proposed ordinance amending the County Code. SUBMITTED BY: Timothy C. Beard Associate Planner APPROVED: i vN~ Elmer C. odge, Jr. County Administrator C ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: Denied ( ) No Yes ~ Received ( ) Brittle Referred Garrett To Johnson McGraw Nickens AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, ON TUESDAY, MAY 26, 1987 ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 13, "OFFENSES-MISCELLANEOUS," SECTIONS 13 AND 14 OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE CONCERNING UNLAWFUL DISPOSAL OF WASTE MATERIALS AND UNLAWFUL ACCUMULATIONS OF TRASH AND WEEDS BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roano County, Virginia, as follows: 1• That Chapter 13, "Offenses-Miscellaneous," Secti~ 13-13. "Unlawful disposal of rubbish or other waste materials of the Roanoke County Code be amended as follows: Sec. 13-13. Unlawful disposal of rubbish or other waste mater (a) No person shall dump or dispose of or leave or cause thrown any rubbish, tin cans, trash substance or material in or upon and along any st~eetr highway, park or alle dispose of Y in the county; nor shall any p. dump or throw any rubbish, tin cans, trash, bage or any other waste material or substance upon ~aean~ lots or property in the county which have not selected, approved and designated as a posal area by the health department of the boa9 ty r trash - 2• That Chapter 13 "Offenses-Miscellaneous," Sec 13 14. Unlawful accumulations of trash and growth of weeds• nuisances and abatement thereof ~ Pu ," of the Roanoke County Code amended as follows: Sec. 13-14. Unlawful accumulation of trash and growth of weE public nuisances and abatement thereof. (a) For the purposes of this section, the following words phrases shall have the meanings respectively ascribed to t by this subsection: (4) Parcel: Any real estate, or an ate, lying and being in the count y en t~~~e~_ tah~erein, si areas zoned for residential, business commercial, o d trial uses e~- y in ar ins~~~t~t~ena}- aeb~v~~p- ~s- ee~e7ae~eel- e~- wl~~el~-any-~aean~-yes}dential--eer~~e~e~a~; -~nelas~~~al; -s~ ~t~~~er~al- ba~~d~ng- er- strr~ett~~e- ~s- }eea~eel or in any s Sion. (6) Subdivision: Any tract or parcel of land divide ti~ree- f3} two (?) or more lots or parcels, een ~~i~ee-fet~~~hg- a f_ an- ae~e_ ef- }and; for the purpose, F immediate or future, of transfer of ownership or develc as otherwise defined in the Roanoke Count Subdivision ance. (c) Weeds growing l~etwee~- A4ay- fist- ane7- ee~ebe~- fii and trash lying on any parcel shall constitute a public sance. It shall be unlawful to cause or maintain a nuisance with respect to any parcel. An owner shall aba public nuisance with respect to this parcel. Betwee f}fteer~ti~-and-3ar~e-f~fteentl~-aid-between-Aagast- f~~st-any tembe~-f~~st-ef-eael~-yeas Every owner of real estate s: in the county shall cause to be cut therefrom all weeds ai remove therefrom all trash. Any owner who shall violat provisions of this subsection shall be deemed guilty Class 4 misdemeanor. 2• The effective date of this amendment shall be Jui 1987. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOK:E COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, ON TUESDAY, MAY 26, 1987 ORDINANCE 52687-11 AMENDING CHAPTER 13, "OFFENSES-MISCELLANEOUS," SECTIONS 13 AND 14 OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE CONCERNING UNLAWFUL DISPOSAL OF WASTE MATERIALS AND UNLAWFUL ACCUMULATIONS OF TRASH AND WEEDS BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanc County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That Chapter 13, "Offenses-Miscellaneous," Secti 13-13. "Unlawful disposal of rubbish or other waste materials of the Roanoke County Code be amended as follows: Sec. 13-13. Unlawful disposal of rubbish or other waste mater (a) No person shall dump or dispose of or leave or cause thrown any rubbish, tin cans, trash, garbage or other substance or material in or upon and along any street, highway, park or alley in the county; nor shall any p dispose of, dump or throw any rubbish, tin cans, trash bage or any other waste material or substance upo. *aaeaa~ lots or property in the county which have not selected, approved and designated as a garbage or trash posal area by the health department of the county. 2. That Chapter 13, "Offenses-Miscellaneous," Se 13-14. "Unlawful accumulations of trash and growth of weeds; p nuisances and abatement thereof," of the Roanoke County Co amended as follows: Sec. 13-14. Unlawful accumulation of trash and growth of w public nuisances and abatement thereof. (a) For the purposes of this section, the following word: phrases shall have the meanings respectively ascribed to by this subsection: (4) Parcel: Any real estate, or any interest therein, ate, lying and being in the county ert wh}eh ar~p in areas zoned for residential, business, commercial, or in trial uses e~ }r~g~}~~~}eaa} aet}r~}gyp }s eerzd~e~ed e wh}eh agp ~aea~t res}dead}~}; ee~ere}a}; }adtts~~}a}; e~ }~ Main Library Roanoke Law Library Zoning Administrator Department of Development ITEM NUMBER ~ -- AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTS IN ROANOKE, VA., ON TUESDAY, MEETING DATE: May 26, 1987 SUBJECT: Acquisition of Easements Castle Rock Sewer Line COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: In order to successfully complete the Castle Rock Sewer Lin Project it is necessary to authorize the acquisition of easement across the real estate of approximately eight (8) property owners Section 18.04 of the County Charter requires that the acquisitio. of real estate or any interest therein be accomplished only b ordinance. The proposed ordinance authorizes the County Administrato to execute such documents and take such actions as may be neces~ nary to accomplish these transactions. The first reading of the proposed ordinance was held May 12, 1987; the second reading is scheduled for May 26, 1987. FISCAL IMPACT: The costs for this project shall be paid from the 1974 sewer bond proceeds. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Board favorably consider thi: proposal by the adoption of the attached ordinance. Respectfully submitted, ~~~~~ Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney a. ----------------------------------------------------------------- Approved Denied Received Referred To Motion by: ACTION Brittle Garrett Johnson McGraw Nickens VOTE No Yes Ab AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANQKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, ON TUESDAY, MAY 26, 1987 ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION ~ ~ ~ OF EASEMENTS, CASTLE ROCK SEWER LINE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanok County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 0 the Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading concerning th acquisition of approximately eight (8) easements for the Casty Rock Sewer Line was held on May 12, 1987. A second reading o. this matter was held on May 26, 1987. 2. That these easements are for underground sewe. lines for the Castle Rock Project. 3. That the County Administrator is authorized to exe cute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanok County as are necessary to accomplish the conveyance of said pro perty, all of which shall be upon form approved by the Count Attorney. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, ON TUESDAY, MAY 26, 1987 ORDINANCE 52687-12 AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION OF EASEMENTS, CASTLE ROCK SEWER LINE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roar, County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 the Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading concerning acquisition of approximately eight (8) easements for the Cas Rock Sewer Line was held on May 12, 1987. A second reading this matter was held on May 26, 1987. 2. That these easements are for underground see lines for the Castle Rock Project. 3. That the County Administrator is authorized to e~ cute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanc County as are necessary to accomplish the conveyance of said pr perty, all of which shall be upon form approved by the Coun Attorney. On motion of Supervisor Garrett, seconded by Supervis Nickens and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None ABSENT: None A COPY - TESTE yYLZ...~.~~-- ~d Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors 5/27/87 CC: File County Attorney Real Estate Assessor Director of Utilities AT A REGULAR MEETING OF COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE IN ROANOKE, MEETING DATE: May 26, 1987 ITEM NUMBER THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROAN ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CEN' VA., ON TUESDAY, SUBJECT_ Acquisition of Easements Brambleton Avenue Highway Project COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Brambleton Avenue Highway Project will require certa adjustments to the existing water system. These adjustments wi require the acquisition of one easement. Section 18.04 of t: County Charter requires that the acquisition of real estate any interest therein be accomplished only by ordinance. The proposed ordinance authorizes the County Administratc to execute such documents and take such actions as may be nece; sary to accomplish these transactions. The first reading of tY proposed ordinance was held May 12, 1987; the second reading ~ scheduled for May 26, 1987. FISCAL IMPACT: ~~~~ The costs for this project shall be paid from the funde depreciation account and was included in the capital replace ment/improvement program. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Board favorably consider thi; proposal by the adoption of the attached ordinance. Respectfully submitted, r,`' "l Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred To Motion by: ACTION Brittle Garrett Johnson McGraw Nickens VOTE No Yes A~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, ON TUESDAY, MAY 26, 1987 " °~ ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION ,....•..~' " OF EASEMENT, BRAMBLETON AVENUE HIGHWAY PROJECT BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanok County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of X18.04 of th Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading concerning the acquisi tion of one (1) easement for the Brambleton Avenue Highway Pro ject was held on May 12, 1987. A second reading on this matte was held on May 26, 1987. 2. That this easement is for underground water line for the Brambleton Avenue Highway Project. 3. That the County Administrator is authorized to exe cute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanok County as are necessary to accomplish the conveyance of said pro perty, all of which shall be upon form approved by the Count Attorney. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, ON TUESDAY, MAY 26, 1987 ORDINANCE 52687-13 AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION OF EASEMENT, BRAMBLETON AVENUE HIGHWAY PROJECT BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roar County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of §18.04 of Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading concerning the acqu~ tion of one (1) easement for the Brambleton Avenue Highway F ject was held on May 12, 1987. was held on May 26, 1987. A second reading on this mat 2. That this easement is for underground water li for the Brambleton Avenue Highway Project. 3. That the County Administrator is authorized to e: cute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roan County as are necessary to accomplish the conveyance of said p: perty, all of which shall be upon form approved by the Cour Attorney. On motion of Supervisor Brittle, seconded by Supervi; Garrett and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: NAYS ABSENT: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnsor None None A COPY - TESTE /V'• Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors 5/26/87 CC: File County Attorney Director of Utilities Real Estate Assessor ROANOKr COUN`I'y BOARD OF ZONING APPFJ\f S STAFF REP'OR~ PUBLIC HEARING: MARCH 18, 1987 Administrative Appeal requested by Springwood Associates to the ~ Administrator's decision defining head gasket or other engine hP~d service and repair or replacement (excluding adjustment) as "major mechanical work" Property located at 3513 Brambleton Avenue within the Windsor Hills Magis1 District. BACKGROUND Applicant (trading as Valley Imported Parts) rezoned the 0.606 acre tract re to above in December 1985. One of several proffered conditions made by the appl conceded that the facility would not be used for major mechanical Unfortunately, the phrase "major mechanical work" was not defined at that Since opening the business, Valley Imported Parts has performed various ty mechanical work and has contested only the placement of engine head and c service under "major mechanical work" implying that it has performed, i performing or may perform engine head or clutch service. Roanoke County con that Valley Imported Parts has indeed broken this condition of rezoning (and ha: formal charges in the matter) as defined by letter of February 5, 1987 fro Zoning Administrator to Springwood Associates describing minor, general and mechanical services. Applicant proffered the following conditions: 1. If rezoned, the property will be developed in accordance with the prelin site plan, except for such modifications as may be required by the County result of its site plan review process. 2. The facility will not be used by the titioner for major mechanical work or automobile body work. 3. There will be no outside storage of vehicles. 4. The facility will not be used to conduct the sale of new or used automobiles. 5. The petitioner will install and maintain such screening as recamiended b Roanoke County Zoning Administrator. 6. The petitioner will install outside lighting in accordance with reo~onmendations and approval of the Roanoke County Zoning Administrator. RDCONY~IENDATION Approve X Deny Reasons: Based upon the written opinions of service managers at Rose Motors (Porsche, Audi, Subaru, Saab) and Berglund Chevrolet Inc. (Chevrolet, AMC/J Renault), Roanoke County contents that the definition of "major mechanical wor} valid and should be upheld as it is written the February 5, 1987 letter. Prepared by James E. Lehe, Planner in consultation with Timothy Beard, Assoc Planner, Claude Lee, Zoning Enforcement Officer, and Robert Stalzer, Directo Planning on March 17, 1987. MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY BOARp OF ZONING APPEALS """" PUBLIC HEARING - MARCH 18, 1987 Present: Mr. Edward Maxey, Chairman Mr. Arthur Trout Mr. Frank Martin Mr. Carlton Wright Mr. Claude Lee, Secretary Messrs. James Lehe, T. C. Beard and Paul Mahoney Absent: Mr. Neil Owen Mr. Maxey called the meeting to order at 7:33 p.m. James Lehe explained the ne staff report that is being used for the meeting. 1. Petition of John Templeton to reduce the side yard requirement from 10 fee' to 0 feet to bring the existing deck into conformance with the RoanokE County Zoning Ordinance, located at 3368 Richards Boulevard in the CavE Spring Magisterial District. There were 9 people present in opposition to the petition. Messrs. Ball anc Sorrells, Mrs. Furrow and Ms. Ayers voiced their opposition to the petitior stating that the request was in violation of the zoning laws and ar infringement on a neighboring property line. Mr. Martin made a motion to approve the request with the followinc conditions: (1) The deck is not to be closer than 3.4 feet to the property line. (2) The property is to be surveyed to determine the property line. The motion was seconded by Mr. Trout and carried unanimously. 2~ Petition of Springwood Associates to appeal the Zoning Administrator's decision to define head gasket or other engine head service and clutch repair or replacement (excluding adjustment) as being "major mechanical work" in relation to a zoning violation charged to Springwood Associates at their business located at 3513 Brambleton Avenue in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District. Michael Smeltzer, attorney, represented Springwood Associates. He presented 22 letters from area automobile repair shops which stated that installation of a clutch and replacement of a head gasket and related parts are minor mechanical work. Tim Beard, Deputy Zoning Administrator, presented two letters fran area automobile repair shops which stated that clutch repair and replacement and head gasket or other engine head service are major mechanical work. Mr. Beard also noted the advertisement in C&P's Yellow Pages for Valley Imported Parts states, "complete repair service." There were two present in opposition to the petition. Henry Faery maintains that major mechanical work is performed at the garage and presented a newspaper ad for Valley Imported Parts which stated "canplete repair work." ~ Mr. Wright made a motion that the replacement of head gaskets and clutch repair is minor mechanical work, but other engine head service is major mechanical work. Mr. Trout seconded the motion which carried unanimously. Old/New Business In accordance with the Code of Virginia, section 2.1-344(a)(6), Mr, Wright moved that the Board of Zoning Appeals enter into executive session at 9 p.m. to discuss a legal matter; the Canpton litigation. Mr, Martin seconded the motion which carried unanimously. The meeting resumed at 9:35 p.m, Copies of the new ~rariance forms were handed out. A work session on the forms will be held April 16. At the order of General District Court, the Compton petition will be brought back to the BZA for reconsideration at the April 16 meeting. There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 9:45 p.m, Respectfully submitted, ~~~ Claude Lee, Secretary Board of Zoning Appeals ' ~ R nNp~ O F p L 2 Gp1 2 a 838 February 5, 1987 ~ ~~ ~~~~~ ~~ ~~~~~r~ ~ ~ DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT PLANNING COMMISSION BOARD OF 20NING APPEAL: Springwood Associates 3214 Electric Road Roanoke, VA 24018 Gentlemen: In an attempt to clarify various definition problems pertaining to Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance, the Department of Planning and Zor offers the following administrative interpretation. The current- future activities of Valley Imported Parts will be evaluated accorc to these standards. 1. Mechanical work - Of or relating to machinery, tools, and mar operations and the installation and/or service involved in s operations--all operations to be conducted within a complet enclosed building. a. Minor mechanical service including new tires batteries work - Vehicle parts, installation anc the following: b. General mechanical work - Vehicle parts installation anc service including and not limited to the following: chassis lubrication engine oil change engine oil filter replacement repack front wheel bearings repacking and seals replacement PCV valve replacement - automatic transmission service (excluding overhauls) wheel balance or computer balance _ - front end alignment - - engine emission system maintenance air, PCV, fuel and emission filter cooling system service; including engine tune-up air conditioning system service brake system maintenance replacement f~.ushing & replaceme exhaust system repair and/or replacement suspension, steering and shock absorber maintenance replacement _P. O. BOX 3600 ROANOI<E COUNTY, VIRGINIA 24015 (703) 772-2069 ~~/ Springwood Associates Page 2 February 5, 1987 c. Major mechanical work - Vehicle parts installation an service including and not limited to the following: engine rebuilding, overhaul or any other activit requiring the removal of block assembly from the vehi~ transmission overhauls .. d j~+~t~aen~) The following has been adapted from the Code of Virginia, Mc Vehicles. 2. Parking - The temporary stay of any motor vehicle upon public private property for a period not to exceed seventy-two hours. 3. Storage - Any stay of a motor vehicle upon public or priv property (other than the property of the owner of such mo vehicle) for a period exceeding seventy-two hours. Valley Imported Parts, by way of the rezoning granted on December 1985, has agreed that no major mechanical work will be conducted 'on site and that no outside storage of vehicles will be permitted. This administrative decision may be appealed to the Board of Zon. Appeals in accordance with Section 21-123A of the Roanoke County Zon: Ordinance. Such an appeal must be in writing stating the reasons the disagreement and must be accompanied by a filing fee of seventy-f~ dollars ($75). Should you have further questions, please contact this office. Yours truly, Robert A. Stalzer, Director of Zoning Administrator ajb cc: Paul Mahoney, County Attor ~.. -- t . e f r{_.... ... ~ ~. - ~- _ .,- - - -. ,e,.. k 1..., y, 4 ^' ~ ~.j~ PETITIONER: SPRINGWt~OD ASSOCIATES CASE NUMBER: 3-1/87 " Planning Commission Hearing Date: January 6, 1987 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: January 27, 1987 j" ~ ,~~ 1. REQUEST Petition of Springwood Associates to amend the conditions of a 0.606 acr to allow construction of an additional retail center located adjacent Brambleton Avenue in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District. 2. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION There were two citizens in opposition present at the Planning Commissio Hearing. 3. SIGNIFICANT IMPACT' FACTORS a. Comprehensive Plan: 1985 Comprehensive Development Plan has placed t within a Transition land use category which discourages general ret~ such as the one proposed. General retail use is contradictory to TR-l, TR-2, and TR-3. Note that the previous rezoning request was al; as a 4 in this category. b. Site Layout: Proposal will use existing entrance. Site is very cons Proposed building will be extremely close to existing building. considerations stated within TR-8 have not been addressed. c. Architecture: No rendering submitted (assuming that it will Y appearance as the previous building). 4. PROFFERED CONDITIONS Petitioner will abide by the regulations within the B-2 District offering the following new conditions: a. To reduce the buffer zone on the western side of the property to ten plant a row of pine trees. b. To amend the previous concept plan to allow for the construction of building. c. No dry cleaning will be conducted on the premises. These conditions are in addition to six conditions that were offered dui previous rezoning. 5. COMMISSIONER'S MOTION, VO`L'E AND REASON Mr. Eddy moved to deny the petition. The motion carried with the follo~ call vote: AYES: Witt, Eddy, Jones, Flippen, Winstead NAYS: None ABSENT: None 6. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE a. None. 7. ATTACHMENTS ,/ Concept Plan (82" x 11") Vicinity Map (82" x 11") ~/ Staff Report Other: ~A .~ Robert alter, Planning Commission Secretary t N h 1 W Y u t ~•~ ~ o a ~ ~ ~ i ~ i ~ i ~ ~ ~ .J i ~ O' 4 x H Y= ye b i t~ - ~ ~ F j, r _T `.~ ~! r; _ b_I `t' I I L ~ ~ 1 ~ I I .R ~ 1 _ N I • i _ w, ~, ~ ~ I I ~ ~~ I ! ~ i 1 0 ~ h ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ' ~ - 7 ~ ~ I i r i ®-i ~ 0- 5 ._ I ~ ~ Q __ ~ ~ 2 ~ ti • W ~ ~ ~~ K ~ 1 I ~ M C ~' m Q O ~ b ~~ ~ ~ Y ;. i i ~ ,ai ~ 'Gl/ 'M q I ` ~ I ~ ~ W N - g I ~ I I ~. ~ I .~Z I i i. ~ i i cy~ '4~~ ~ ~~~} 5 ~ 7- O N 1 l W .-__ ~--3 0'28 NORTH - A ~ ~ lay ~ / ~ • y xnea Pinevale ~~ -~.. j- ~~ ~~ soar ioo xs as Road -~ ~~, ae,a e~.oe e~.oa >9.% as ~ ~~ ~~s. Ary "'' T`=-tin ROANOKE COUNTY Springwood Associates DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT Amended Conditions ,~ I'i ~ i ~~ STAFF REPORT CASE NUMBER: 3-1/87 PETITIONER: SPRINGWOOD A~ REVIEWED BY: ROB STALZER DATE: DECEMBER 29, 1986 Petition of Springwood Associates to amend the conditions of acre parcel to allow construction of an additional retail center adjacent to 3513 Brambleton Avenue in the Windsor Hills Magi, District. 1. NATURE OF REQUEST a. Request to modify proffered conditions offered and accep rezoning petition #51-11/85, Springwood Associ b. Modification will permit construction of a building to for unspecified commercial purposes and the reduction buffer zone on the western side of the property. c. Attached concept plan and vicinity maps describe concel fully. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS a. Petitioner will abide by the regulations within the B-2 D and is offering the following two new conditions: (1) To the buffer zone on the western side of the property to t. and plant a row of pine trees. (2) To amend the previous c plan to allow for the construction of a retail building. conditions are in addition to six conditions that were o during the previous rezoning. These proffers are as fc (.1) The facility will not be used by the petitioner for mechanical work or for automobile body work. (2) There ~ no outside storage of vehicles. (3) T}ie facility wi1.1 used to conduct the sale of new or used automobiles. petitioner will install and maintain such screeni recommended by the Roanoke County Zoning Administrator. petitioner will install outside lighting in accordance ~,ri recommendations and approval of the Roanoke County Administrator. (6) The petitioner agrees to comply wit} sound emission regulations as may be promulgated by the F? County Planning Staff. Additionally, the petitioner agrf take such action as necessary in order to reduce t'ne noise to no more than the level of businesses noa~ existing i immediate vicinity of the property sought to be zoned. b. The B-2 zoning district allows a wide variety of intF commercial office and institutional uses. _. Site plan review required to insure conformity with regulations. 3. SITE' CHARACTERISTICS a. Topography: Flat in front with steeply sloped embankme rear of property. b. Ground Cover: Cleared. 5g /~?r 4. AREA CHARACTERISTICS ~~ a. Future Growth Priority: Situated within the Winds o: Community Planning area; designated as a stable growtl Currently served by urban services. b. Parcel abuts US 221 and adjoins existing commercial an density residential development. 5. LAND USE IMPACT ASSESSMENT Rating: Rate each factor according to the impact of the p. action. Use a scale of 1 through 5. 1 = positive impact, 2 = negligible impact, 3 = manageable i 4 = disruptive impact, 5 = severe impact, and N/A = not applic RATING FACTOR COMMENTS LAND USE COMPATIBILITY 4 a. Comprehensive Plan: 1985 Comprehensive Development P1 placed this area within a Transition land use category discourages general retail uses such as the one prc General retail use is contradictory to policies T R-l, TR- TR-3. Note that the previous rezoning request was also r< a 4 in this category. 3 b. Surrounding Land: Low density residential as well as e: strip development and heavily traveled primary highway. 3 c. Neighboring Area: Parcel abuts heavily traveled hi Neighboring area primarily mixed strip commercial and ex low density residential. 4 d. Site Layout: Proposal will use existing entrance. Site i constrained. Proposed building will be extremely clc existing building. Policy considerations stated withi have not been addressed. 4 e. Architecture: No rendering submitted (assuming that i have the appearance as the previous building). 3 f. Screening and Landscape: Proffered conditions request a 1 buffer yard on western side of property. Adjacent zonirYg Residential. Minimum required buffer yard is 25 feet. unlikely however that the area will remain zoned as residen 3 g. Amenities: Parking cannot be determined becaczse square f of building has not been defined. 2 h. Natural. Features: No negative effect. TRAFFIC 3 i. Street Capacities: Served by major arterial highway U~ Specific daily traffic generation cannot be calculated wi more specific building and use information. Anticipate moderate ADT. US 221 currently carries approximately 2 vehicles per day. Improvements to road currently underway. 3 j. Circulation: Direct access to heavily traveled major art highway. Petitioner should maintain single entrance to property in both buildings. ~~~ ~-.r~.: UTILITIES ..`7 2 k. Water: Adequate supply, adequate distribution. 2 1. Sewer: Adequate capacity, adequate transmission. DRAINAGE 2 m. Basin: 2 n. Floodplain: PUBLIC SERVICES ? o. Fire Protection: Within established service standard. water supply for fire flow. ? p. Rescue: Within established service standard. N/A q. Parks and Recreation: N/A r. School: TAX BASE 3 s. - Land and Improvement Value: $235,000 - Taxable Gross Sales/Year: Unknown - Total Employees: Estimated to be 10 - Total revenue to the County/Year: Approximately $3,6 including sales tax revenue. ENVIRONMENT 2 t. Air: 2 u. Water: 2 v. Soils: 2 w. Noise: 3 x. Signage: Not specified. Existing sign received varianc BZA for closer placement to highway right-of-way. 6. PLAN CONSISTENCY This area is designated as a Transition land use category, general commercial is a discouraged use. This proposal. i consistent with either the land use types or the defined po within the Transition land use category. 7. STAFF EVALUATION a. Strengths: (1) Adjoins major arterial highway. b. Weaknesses: (1) Does not conform with stated land use ty~ policies. (2) Specific use has not been specified. (3) Plac and size of building has not been specified. (4) Site layc constrained. (5) Architecture not specified. ~"~= ~ !"- ~-- ~ ~. ~ LDGAL NOTICE OF A RDGULAR MEETII~ OF THE ROANOKE QOUNi'Y B(~D OF SUPERVISOF Notice is hereby given to all interested persons that the Roanoke County Bc Supervisors will hold a pt~.blic hearing at 7:00 P. M. on Tuesday, January 27, 19 the Roanoke County Admi~iistration Center, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, SW, in Rc Virginia to hear the follcxaing request: 1. Petition of Springwood Associates to amend-the conditions on a 0.60 parcel to allow construction of a retail business, located adjacent tc Brambleton Avenue, in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District. The Roanoke County Planning Commission recoRtnends denial of the request. All plans and ordinances are available for inspection in the Departure Development, Room 600, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, Roanoke, Virginia. Roanokec will provide assistance to handicapped persons desiring to attend public hear Such individuals are requested to contact the County office of Personnel Sep 703/772-2018 if special provisions are needed for attendance. Given under my hand this 8th day of January, 1987. Please publish evening edition Roanoke Times & World-News _ January 13, 1987 January 20, 1987 . r~ Mary Allen, Acting Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Please bill: Springwood Associates 3214 Electric Road, S.W. Roanoke, VA 24018 VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY ..., ~8 ~= y Page 1 of 2 A 0.606 acre parcel of land, ) adjacent to 3513 generally located Brambleton Ave., SW ) on the northerly side of Brambleton Ave. ) within the Windsor Hills ~ ) PETITION Magisterial District, and ) recorded as parcel # 77.09-~-37 ) in the Roanoke County Tax Records.) TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY: WHEREAS, your Petitioner Springwood. Associates respectfully files this petition pursuant to Section 21-105 0 Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance and in accordance with the Cc Virginia of 1950, as amended, and would respectfully shop following: 1) The Petitioner is the owner of the above-referenced part land. 2) The property is presently zoned under the provisions c Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance as B-2 , condi ti onal District. 3) The property is designated transitional in the Future Land Use Guide of the Roanoke Co Comprehensive Development Plan. the conditions. amended 4) You r P e t i t i o n e r now desire s t o have kh~xpxx~s~t~xx~o~ specifically, the site plan as follows : s~odxxfx~xxts~ecxpaa a~ To reduce the buffer zone on the westerly property line to ten fE with a row of pine trees. b~ To amend. the site plan to allow for the construction of a build.ir to be leased for retail business use, Page 2 of 2 WHEREFORE, your Petitioner respectfully requests that the Ordinance of Roanoke County be amended and that the above-ref site plan be amended. ~~X~~ex~a as set out in number 4. FURTHER, your Petitioner requests that this petition be re by the Secretary to the Roanoke County Planning Commission consideration and recommendation. Respectfully submitted, --~ Peti~.'ioner VIRGINIA: Page 1 of 2 BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY p, 0.606 acre parcel of land, ) adjacent to 3513 generally located Brambl P+on Av ;j,, SW ) on the northerly side of Brambleton Ave. ) within the Windsor Hills RECOMMENDATION Magisterial District, and ) recorded as parcel # 77.09-~-37 ) in the Roanoke County Tax Records.) TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY: WHEREAS, your Petitioner Springwood. Associates has filed with the Secretary to the d th Planning Commission a peti~ amen e conditions of no~$acoaxe the above-referenced parcel of land from B-2 c District to B-2c District for the purl constructing a building for lease to retail businesses WHEREAS, the petition was referred to the Planning Comn which, after due legal notice as required by Section 15.1-431 Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended, did hold a public heal January ~ 87 19 and WHEREAS, at that public hearing all parties in interes afforded an opportunity to be heard; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due considerati~ recommended to the Board of County Supervisors that the amendmE ~ ~~~ denied. Page 2 o f 2 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Com recommends to the Board of County Supervisors that the ~~~Xxc~s~~3.xxxfx~raaxdx conditions of tt~e above-referenced parce of land not be a~;~ended D4Sit~ctC. The above action was ad. motion of f'ir. Eddy dl~ix~4 and upon the following record AYES: '~:~itt, Eddy, Jones, Flippen, !°~instead NAYS : .lone ABSENT: "done Respectfully submitted, Rob Stalzer, Secretary Roanoke,. County Planning Commission a8 A P P E A R A N C E R E Q U E S T PUBLIC HEARING ON (, -,. ) f~ .~ z- ~ ~-~; ,-- ~-c< <~ << ~ ~' ' i / ~.~~;'- c'c, r'r'~i':~~ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter that I may comment, I understand that the Chairman may se limit on the length of time I may speak. P L E A S E W R I T E L E G I B L Y NAME: ADDRESS : ~~` --/ ~ _ ~> - ~ ~1 ~ L``,' its l~-C ~. c, PHONE : i-=' - -, ~- _ ~=, PLEASE NOTE: After filling out, give to the Coun- Administrator. Thank you.> N ~Z 4 T O 2 ` r r ~ ~ ~ y a ~ ~ .. ~° ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ aa ~~ ~~ ~ ~ N o~ N it ~x ~°`. 'r ~~ Page 1 of 2 VIRGINIA: ~~'"~ '~.~_ BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY A 0.606 acre parcel of land, ) adjacent to 3513 generally located Brambleton Ave., SW ) on the northerly side of Brambleton Ave, ) Windsor Hills ) FINAL ORDER within the Magisterial District, and ) ~ recorded as parcel # 77.09-~-37 ) in the Roanoke County Tax Records.) TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY: Springwood Associates OL WHEREAS, your Petitioner a~~~~ cg~de t ~ao~ o $fe did petition the Board of County Supervisors to B-?c referenced parcel of land from B-2c District for the purpose ~ District to of constructing a building to lease to retail businesses WHEREAS, after due legal notice, the Planning Commission did hol 19 37 at which time a public hearing of the petition on 1/Fi _ all parties in interest were given an opportunity to be heard; and WHEREAS, after full consideration, the Board of Count amendment roved with additional Supervisors determined that the ~~~Q~~~J be app proffer of conditions. condi~~io~~s of t~~' arcel c NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDERED that theAaforementioned p land, which is contained in the Roanoke County Tax Maps as Parcel ~7.C9-n.-~~and recorded in Deed Book l~?'o p' 1,1~`' and legally describe ~i District below, be ~`~e~~i~xi from B-2 Conditional B-2 conditional District. to permit t{1e construction of a building9 for lease to retail businesses. ~~^~ • r page 2 of 2 Le al Description of Property: g Property located in the County of Roanoke, State of Virginia. BEGINNING at an iron pin located on the northerlyointe of Brambleton Avenue, S.W. (U. S. Route 221), said p being corner to the property of Charlotte Heslep (Will Book 32, page 498); thence with the northerly side of Brambleton Avenue, S. 58° 00' 00" W. 166.4 feet to an iron pin, corner to g=ambletonDAvenuenandlwith therlinenof Map; thence leaving Lot 15, N. 32° 00' 00" W. 165 feet to an iron pin on t e line of Lot 17; thence with the line of Lot 17, N. 58° 00' E. 8.32 feet to an iron pin corner to Lot W-2; thence with the line of Lot W-2 the following two courses and distances: S. SO° 48' 00" E. 51.09 feet to in 1thencenN. and N. 03° 37' 07" E. 41.4 feet to an iron p' ° 58° 00' 00" E. 98.45 feet to an iron pin corner to the Heslep property; thence with the Heslep property, S. 30 59' 00" E. 165.02 feet to an iron pin on the northerly side of Brambleton Avenue, THE PLACE OF BEGINNING: and CONTAINING 0.606 acres and being as more particularly shown on plat of survey made by Buford T. Lumsdeust 29, Associates, P.C., Engineers-Surveyors, dated Aug 1985; and ••' BEING the same property conveyed to Springorood Associates, a Virginia General Partnership, by deed from Bane Inte 985i.onal Corporation, a Virginia Corporation, dated August 28, and recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court o in Deed Book 1225, pane 1136. Roanoke County, Virginia, E IT FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this order be transmitted to B cretary of the Planning Commission and that he be directed to the Se reflect that change on the official zoning map of Roanoke County. Garrett ADOPTED on motion of Supervisor . recorded vote: and upon the following AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None ABSENT: None Deputy ~~,/• Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors 5/27/87 CC: Director of Planning, Zoning & Grants Real Estate Assessor Department of Development a~ M VIRGINIA: ~`7 - 7 ~ ~- ..e BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY A 0.606 acre parcel of land, ) generally located adjacent to 3513 ~ Brambleton Avenue (on the northerly side of Brambleton Avenue) within the !~dindsor Hills ~ Magisterial District, and recorded as parcel # 77.09-4'-37 ~ in the Roanoke County Tax Records. PROFFER OF CONDITIONS TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY: Being in accord with Sec. 15.1-491.1 et seq. of the Code of ~~ ~- w F- L v 0 0 w 0 a a Q Virginia and Sec. 21-105E. of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance, the Petitioner Springwood Associates hereby voluntarily proffers to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia the following conditions to the rezoning of the above-referenced parcel of land: Petitioner will abide by the regulations within the B-2 District and is offering the following three new conditions: (1) To reduce the buffer zone on the western side of the property to ten feet and plant a row of pine trees. (2) To amend the previous concept plan to allow for the construction of a retail building. (3) No dry cleaning will be conducted on the premises. These conditions are in addition to six conditions that were offered during the previous rezoning. These proffers are as follows: (1) The facility will not be used by the petitioner for major mechanical work or for automobile body work. (2) There will be no outside storage of vehicles. (3) The facility will not be used to conduct the sale of new or used automobiles. (4) The petitioner will install and maintain such screening as recommended by the Roanoke County Zoning Administrator. (5) The petitioner will install outside lighting in accordance with the recommendations and approval of the Roanoke County Zoning Administrator. (6) The petitioner agrees to comply with such sound emission regulations as may be promulgated by the Roanoke County Planning Staff. Additionally, the petitioner agrees to take such action as necessary in order to reduce the noise level to no more than the level of businesses now existing in the immediate vicinity of the property sou t to be zoned. l Pe ltioner `... ..;. f ;" ,,,~,,,, OF ROANOKE COUNTY VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS of land, ) p, 0.606 acre parcel acent to ) generally located adz SW~ on ) PROFFER OF 3513 Brambleton Ave., ) side of ~ CONDITIONS the northerly within the ) Ave. ) Brambleton isterial ) Windsor Hills Mag and recordndthe ) District77.09-4-37 parcel # Tax Records. ) County gOANOKE COUNTY: Roanoke SUPERVISORS OF a Virginia TO THE HONORABLE petitioner, Springwood Associates, 1. The original Petition wishes to amend its osed on General Partnership, reviously imp an amendment to the conditions P requesting erty. amended as the above PrOP 4 of the original Petition is 2. Paragraph follows: have the conditions Your Petitioner now desires to imposed be amended as follows previously a. an previously filed substituting To amend the Site Pl & made by Balzer therefore a new Site Plan Associates, dated May 22, 1987• Amended Petition Springwood Associates Page 2 b. The following uses will not be conducted on the property: 1) No dry cleaning will be conducted on said property 2) Hotels 3) Motels 4) Theaters 5) Assemby halls 6) New car dealerships 3, Except as amended herein, the original Petition shall remain unchanged. Respectively submitted, r~nmRn • 1 ~1 AiVY ~/~l '"i 0 Michael K. Smeltzer, Esq. Woods, Rogers & Hazlegrove p.O. BOX 720 Roanoke, VA 24004 (703) 982-4252 Spri wood Ass c' es By B Counsel A p p , PUB E A R A N C E R E 4 U E S S LIC g~RING ON ,~ ~ _ T ~ ~ .. ~. c I would like the Chairman recognize me during the of the Board of Supervisors that I Public hearin tO ~Y comment, g °n the above matter so below. I agree to follow the WHEN CALLED TO T guidelines ADDRESS FOR HE PODIUM listed THE RECORD. ~ I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND 1• Each speaker available Will have betwe representative her s en three and peaking as an indivi five minutes base The chairman wi dual or will enforce the ber of 11 decide the rule u less ens speaking on time the Board to instructed by t limit do otherwise, an issue, and 2' Speakers he ~Jority of view onl will be limited to the Chairman Questions of a Presentati clarification on °f their 3• All co ~Y be entertpoint of mments ained by a recognized p esker and acted t he Board. audie o t 4• Both and a nce members Debate between timesspeakers the is not allowed, udience will exercise courtes 5' Speakers are requested to Y at all and/or comments leave with the clerk, anY written 6• INDIVIDUALS statements FILE WITH THEURPORTING TO ALLOWING THE CLERK WRrTTENPEAIC FOR AN ORGANIZED INDIVIDUAL To A UTHORIZA TION F GROUP SHALL REPRESENT THEM. ROM THE GROUP P L E A S E W R I T E L E G _ _ I B L y NAME : +~ ~~ ADDRESS : ~`J-'~ 7 ~~~ V_ ~~~ PHONE: 7r PLEASE NOTE: (After filling out Clerk • • ~ give puty Thank you, to the De A P P E A R A1N C'E R E Q U E S T PUBLIC HEARING ON .S~' i ~, !f = ~-c I would l i ~ ~-~-z-~. _ ~~,~,,~,.~c"c,~ ke the Chairman of the Board of Su recognize me Burin Pervisors to g the public hearin that I g on the above matter so may comment. I agree to follow the guidelines liste below, d WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIV ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. E MY NAME AND 1• Each speaker will available whether Save between three and representative, peaking as an individual orminutes based on the The chairman will will enforce Lumber of citizens decide the time he rule speaking on an issuelmit the Board to do otherwiseeSS instructed b and Y the majority of 2• Speakers will view onl be limited to a presentation Y• Questions of clarification ma of their the Chairman, point of y be entertained by 3• All comments a reco must be directed to the Board. gnized speaker and audience members Debate between 4• Both speakers is not allowed. times. and the audience will exercise 5 • S courtesy at all andakers are requested to /or comments with the leave any written clerk, statements 6• INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FILE WITH THE CLERK W FOR AN ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUALTTON AUTHORIZATIONGFNIZED GROUP SHALL REPRESENT THEM. ROM THE GROUP P L E A S E W R r T E L E G I B L Y NAME: ADDRESS; PHONE; PLEASE NOTE; ~ n 1.7~ZE!.~ c. ~? J; ~~ w - ~- ,,`~ (After filling out Clerk. Thank you.~glve tO the Deputy ,~ PETITIONER: J.B. GORIA CASE NIIl~ER: 17-5/87 Planning Commission Hearing Date: May 5, 1987 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: May 26, 1987 1. REQUEST ~ ~ ~.~-_ Petition of J. B. Goria to rezone 1.57 acres from B-3, Business, to B- Business, to construct an office building, located on the south side of Route 4 immediately east of N&W Railway and approximately 365 feet west of Bernard Dri in the Cave Spring Magisterial District. 2. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION No one in opposition was present at the Planning Commission Public Hearing. 3. SIGNIFICANT IMPACT FACTORS a. None. 4. PROFFERED CONDITIONS a. There will be no freestanding, outdoor advertising signage. b. Petitioner will provide fire hydrant near entrance to property on servi< road. c. Site plan to include a yield sign for existing traffic from site on frontac road at intersection with Route 419. 5. CAN~IISSIONER'S MOTION, VOTE AND REASON Mr. Witt moved to approve the petition with proffered conditions. The motio carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Witt, Eddy, Flippen NAYS: None ABSENT: Jones, Winstead 6. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE a. None. 7. ATrACFIl~`I'S ~ Concept Plan (8~" x 11") / Vicinity Map (8~" x 11") ~ Staff Report Other: ~ ~ ~ Robert Sta zer, Planning Commission Secretary r~ ro _~ " ~ ~ I 1 ~i~ 1 ,t n ~ , t . f y IZ:, \ ~ ~ ~~ ~ , ,~ ~~ ':~ .~$" ~ ~ ,~ to j n ~ ~, ~~ v~ ~.~ t i ~~ ~: n~ Rm9~ d~~ ~~ g~` ~Y n',.I J ~.. GOI~EN CORRAL RES'I'A[JRI,NT PROPER`T'Y 5 7 --------- 1-_ - -- -- -- -- r- - -- --- - --- i ~ -- -t --y-- - -- - -- I Q ~ ~I _ •I ~I ~ ~. ~~ _.-.T._f.,T~ I I M ~• ~ ~, I - 19 I ~ Jj~. ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~.: ~ .~ ~..` I -- ~' "- ~F~ ,,~ +. i~ ~~ ~I ~ SA' x_ - ~~a~= _- - -~:> -F- ~~ ~ ~ ~_1_L~ .,; ..~~~'~ ,.; . ~ '; N to jj . a n ~ ~ ,~ O~-`~' ~~~s~ ~ ~~~ ~OROj~C Ft 2'~. " li 1~. ~~ ~ CONC'TE''I' PI~1N FOR RL;'Z,ONING B-3 'T~ B-2 ril 6 1987 --"--- ~ -- ..._ . .trn~er t Ambt~a,9~, G~iG-a F'~~rT^r' F'Zrt J b G~RJ,6.Cn!.~N1`y,RGµ1-- R...~",L ~.~1~"~~- -.- _. _.____ .. _ i ~ ~.~~ F--i 7 ,ti 0 'd ~~~ D a ~n~Tu ~. ~ ~. ~ ~~ •N h t '.. P ROANOKE COUNTY ~,g, Goria ~~' DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT g_3 to g-2 ^^v^n^^^ n^n^ STAFF REPORT CASE NUMBER: REVIEWED BY: 17-5/87 BONNIE NEWLON ~C.~ ~/ - PETITIONER: J.B. GORIA DATE: 4-30-87 Petition of J. B. Goria to rezone 1.57 acres from B-3, Business, to B-2, Business, to construct an office building, located on the south side of Route 419 immediately east of N&W Railway and approximately 365 feet west of Bernard Drive in the Cave Spring Magisterial District. 1. NATURE OF REQUEST a. Unconditional proposal to construct an approximate 13,000 sq.ft. "Class A" office building and accessory parking on 1.57 acres. b. Concept plan illustrates proposal more fully. 2. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS a. B-2 General Commercial District subject to site plan requirements (including screening and buffering on street frontage, height restrictions, parking requiremnts, and the sign ordinance. b. Commercial entrance permit from VDOT must be obtained. 3. SITE CHARACTERISTICS a. Topography: Larger portion of site is flat, accessed by driveway sloping up from frontage road along Route 419. b. Ground Cover: Low growing vegetation. 4. AREA CHARACTERISTICS a. Future Growth Priority: Situated within the Cave Spring Community Planning Area designated by the Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors as an area where growth should be stabilized. Infill development will continue to occur. b. General area is developed with commerical establishments and services, and office structures along Route 419. 5. LAND USE IMPACT ASSESSMENT Rating: Rate each factor according to the impact of the proposed action. Use a scale of 1 through 5. 1 = positive impact, 2 = negligible impact, 3 = manageable impact, 4 = disruptive impact, 5 = severe impact, and N/A = not applicable. RATING FACTOR COMMENTS LAND USE COMPATIBILITY 1 a. Comprehensive Plan: 1985 Comprehensive Development Plan has placed this area within a Core land use category. Office development is highly compatible with and encouraged in Core. Route 419 is a major arterial capable of sustaining moderate traffic generation of approximately 175 ADT as proposed. - 1 b. Surrounding Land: Site is surrounded by Core designation on boundaries other than the east (Norfolk and Western Rai: right-of-way acting as border between Core and Transition). 1 c. Neighboring Area: Commercial and general office uses. ,.~ ~f ~. ? d. Site Layout: Roanoke County Engineerin su ~ turning radius be considered for drivewaygentrancesto 20 lot. A yield sign should be placed at the intersectior driveway with access to 419 for traffic coming f rom the site improve safety. 1 e. Architecture: Applicant has constructed other attra Projects in Roanoke County, such as Promenade Park, ct ? f. Screening and Landscape: Adequate area for ord' compliance, i na ~ ? g. Amenities: Adequate parking area (one space per 200 required). sq.. ? h. Natural Features: TRAFFIC 3 i. Street Capacities: Traffic generation estimated at 175 A~ Current usage of Route 419 is 38,000 ADT. Pavement width is feet. Route 419 classified as a major arterial--present a future. Frontage road is not in state system at this time. 3 J• Circulation: Yield sign su to be located at access fromgfrontage troadl onto1Routem4l~ Turning radius at entrance to should have 20'-25' radius for peasenof lcirculationn ande si i distance. UTILITIES 3 k. Water: Adequate public facilities and supply. 3 1. Sewer: Adequate lines and treatment capabilities. DRAINAGE 3 m. Basin: Manageable impact. N/A n. Floodplain: • PUBLIC SERVICES 3 0. Fire Protection: Proffer requested of linstallationtofefirenhadrantCave Spring #3 to property on service road because fire h drantnaar entrance 400 ft. from edge of property. y PProximatel~ 3 P• Rescue: Within travel time standard of Cave Sprin #3 2 g q. Parks and Recreation: Minimal demand. ? r. School: Minimal demand. FAX BASE /"';`~,~, ~._'. y, ~" 1 s..___ -_ Land and Improvement Value: $930,000 _ Taxable Gross Sales/Year: Unknown =-~~ Total Employees: Approximately 50 -- -- Total revenue to the County/Year: A real property taxes and an additionallunknown$amounOt o __ business-related taxes. -1VI RONMENT 2 t~ir: ? inter: ? veils: 2 w =-- ise: 3 x~agnage: 6. PLA CONSISTENCY This area is designated as Core land use category in the Land Use Plan-end office development is highly compatible and encouraged. 7. STAB-DEVALUATION a•_-_~rengths: (1) High quality design may be anticipated from this -~veloper. Proposal conforms to Land Use Plan and promotes several Core policies (mixed use when development and arterial highway frontage location). b. Weaknesses: (1) Site plan should incor orate existing traffic from site on frontage road at interse ction nwith Route 419 to improve safety. (2) Proffer of hydrant on frontage road requested to improve fire service capacity. (3) Signage should be specified. (4) Office use should be specified by way of proffer. ..._..-- L E G A L N O T I C E Notice is hereby given to all interested persons that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at 7:00 p.m. on Tuesday, May 26, 1987, in the Community Room at the Roanoke County Administration Center, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, S.W., Roanoke, Virginia, on the petition of J. B. Goria, requesting rezoning from B-3 Business to B-2 Business of a tract containing 1.57 acres and located c the south side of Route 419 immediately east of N&W Railway and approximately 365 feet west of Bernard Drive in the Cave Spring Magisterial District. Rezoning has been requested to construct an office building. The County Planning Commission recommends approval with proffered conditions. A copy of the Zoning Ordinance of Roanoke County and amendment thereto as well as a copy of the petition, site plan, and other documents related to this request may be examined in the office of the Department of Development, located in Room 600 at the Roanoke County Administration Center. Roanoke County will provide assistance to handicapped persons desiring to attend public hearings. Such individuals are requested to contact the County office of Personnel Services ([703] 772-2018) if special provisions are necessary for attendance. Given under my hand this 7th day of May, 1987. Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Please publish in the evening edition of the Roanoke Times and World News on: Tuesday, May 12, 1987 Tuesday, May 19, 1987 Direct the bill for Publication to: Mr. J. B. Goria P. 0. Box 20269 Roanoke, Virginia 24018 VIRGINIA: Page 1 of 2 BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY A 1.57 acre parcel of land, ) generally located southerly side ) ' of Va. Rte. 419, west of Starkey Rd. ) within the Cave Spring. ) PETITION Magisterial District, and ) recorded as parcel # 87 07-3-11 ) in the Roanoke County Tax Records.) TO TfiE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY: WHEREAS, your Petitioner J. B. Goria respectfully files this petition pursuant to Section 21-105 of t}ie Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance and in accordance with the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended, and would respectfully show r_hA fallowing: 1) The Petitioner is the owner of the above-referenced parcel ~~~ land. 2) The property is Freser~tly zoned under the provisions of tl~e Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance as B-3 llistrict. ~lannec 3) T h e p r o p e r t y i s designated General Cotu~rcial . Sho~oina GPntPrf RPta it in the E'uture Land Use Guide of the Roanoke Corank}~ Comprehensive Development Plan. 4) Your Petitioner now desires to have this property rezoned as B-2 uistrict for the purpose of _Construc__t~ an approximate 13000 sq. f-t. "Class A" office buildinc~_tliere~~~i Page 2 of 2 WHEREFORE, your Petitioner respectfully requests that the Zoning Ordinance of Roanoke County be amended and that the above-referenced parcel of land be rezoned as set out in number 4. FURTHER, your Petitioner requests that this petition be referred by the Secretary to the Roanoke County Planning Commission for its consideration and recommendation. Respectfully submitted, ~~ ~ Pep ' t Toner R VIRCINTA: Page 1 of 2 BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY A 1.57 acre parcel of land, ) generally located so~_ ugly side ) of Va. Rte. 419, west of Starke Rd. ) wit}iin the Cave Spring ) RECOMMENDATION Magisterial District, and ) recarded as parcel # 87.07-3-11 ) in the Roanoke County Tax Records.) TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF' ROANOKE COUNTY: WHERF,AS, your petitioner J. B. Goria has filed with th:~ Secretary to the Planning Commission a petition tc rezone the above-referenced parcel of land from _D-3 District to B-2 District for the purpose of .constructing an approximate 13,000 sa. ft. "Class A" offrP h,,;i,a;r,.. ~..._______ WHEREAS, the petition was referred to the Planning Commission which, after due legal notice as required by Section 15.1-431 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended, did hold a public hearing oti MaL5_ 19 87 ; an d WFIEREAS, at that public hearing all parties in interest were afforded an opportunity to be heard; and GVHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due consideration hay; recommended to t}:e Board of County Supervisors that the rezoning be a~~proved with proffered conditinn~ Page 2 of 2 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commissic recommends to the Board of County Supervisors that the above referenced parcel of land New Tax -?~iap # 87.07-3-11 Cave Spring Magisterial District. The above action was adopted c motion of on wi tt ,x >omcx~~~aa~~lx~ XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXYXYYYYYVY~ and upon the following recorded vo tE AYES: 4~i tt, Eddy, F1 i ppen NAYS: Pdone ABSENT: Jones, Winstead ~,~ ~, Respectfully submitted, Bonnie L. Newlon _ Secretary Roanoke County Planning Commission ` Page 1 of 2 OUNTY '~~ VIRGINIA: OF ROANOKE C BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS arcel of land ) 1.57 acre p ) A Up,, Rte located S side of ant & generally Corral ReStaur ) FI~ ER 419 between Golden N5 gailwa ) within the ~ ) and ~ Magisterial District, ) # 87.07-3-11 ~ recorded as parcel oanoke County Tax Records ) -~ in the R OF ROp-NOKE COUNTY° - SUPERVISORS --- z `PO THE HONORABLE above - J• g, Go the w Petitioner rezone ~ to o WHEREAS, Your County Supervisors the Board °f ~_ o etition g-3 ore F-- did p from the purr el of land District for __._---- o referenced pare ~-' g•-2 ~ did hc~lcl o to ~ District ~ e Commission W office tyre planning Q of constructlsr a ~ legal notice, at whicYr ti"'`'• after due 5 19 87 WEiEREAS - on Isla and the petition to be heard; a public hearing of an opportunity CoutrrY were given a rd o f i.n int hest the Bo artier consideration, all p full with proffered __. WHEREAS, after hat the rezoning be ap roved Supervisors determined _------'--' of t the aforementioned parcel .S~ ORDERED tha Parcel BE 1.r Tax Maps as NU`,,j, THEREFORE County ibed the Roanoke legally descr is contained in and land, wYrich gook Deed District ~ and r e cO r ded r- n ------'"__ _.----' _."----- from 3-3 below, be rezoned District. ~~•j ~ f~ .. - 1 BEGINNING AT A CONC.HWY.MON. ON THE SOUTH RITHTTHE EASTLRIGHT- OF VIRGINIA ROUTE 419 AT ITS FNNORFOLKIO&NWESTERN RAILWAY CO. OF-WAY LINE OF THE PROPERTY 0 (NOW NORFOLK-SOUTHERN) THENCE LEAVING SAID BEGIUTEN4190IN7 AND WITH THE SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE ON V THENCEA LEAVING ROUTE 419 5890-51'-40"'243.94' TO AN IRON PI , THENCE 58.10-021-30"E 91.72' N-Oa 08'-20"E 35.07' TO AN IRON PIN, TO AN IRON PIN CORNER TO PROPERTY OF GOLDEN COORNER TOENTRAVELERS WITH SAME S8O-57'-30"W 225,0' TO AN .IRON PIN 232..,581 TO AN IRON PROPERTY", THENCE WITH SAME N81~-02'-3011 W RAILI~JAY PROPERTY PIN CORNER IN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF THE O & ,_00"W 245.06 (NOW NORFOLK-SOUTHERN) THENCE WITH SAME N16 -27 1 TO THE PLACE OF BEGINNING AND CONTAINING 1.57 ACTANGDEWOODG TRACT 3 AS SHOWN ON THE DIVISION OF PROPERTY OF MALL,- INC. OF RECORD IN THE CLERK'S OFFICE OF THE CIRPREPAROEDRT OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA IN PLAT BOOIF9EDALAND80SURVEYORS BY BUFORD T. LUMSDEN ~ ASSOC. P.C. CER DATED OCTOBER 12, 1979• r,_ A Page 2 of 2 Legal Description of Property: Attached 'Hereto. ~~ BE YT FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this order be transmitted the Secretary of t}~e Planning Commission and that he be directed t~ reflect that change on the official zoning map of Roanoke County. ADOPTED on motion of Supervisor Brittle ._ and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None ABSENT: None Deputy `/n-Cc~-cam.- s~ • C l e r k Roanoke County Board of Supervisors 5/27/87 CC: Director of Planning, Zoning & Grants Department of Development Real Estate Assessor f 4 -. VIRGINIA: OF ROANOKE COUNTY FORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY SUPERVISORS BE arcel of land, acre p A -~-~5-~ - southerly ~ the located °n generally PROS side of Route ~:1~, west of Starkey ~ ~ OF Road ~ CONDITIONS within the Cave Sprinn and ~ Magisterial District, ~_ X7.07-?~-11 ~ ~ recorded as parcel # in the Roanoke County Tax Records. OF ROANOKE COUNTY: ~~~ ~ TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS 91 1 et seq. of the Code of r- L.3 I-- U v c~ ~-- u~ 7 0 a a Q with Sec. 15.1-4 Being in accord Zoning nd Sec. 21-105E- of the Roanoke County Virginia ~ Ordinance, the Petitioner J."~• Goria and of Supervisors of hereby voluntarily proffers to the Bo . e following conditions to the rezoning Roanoke County, Virginia th f the above-referenced parcel of land: ° outcloor advertising sic,nanP• will be no freestandinn~ entrance to property 1, There h Brant near rovide fire y 2• Petitioner will p traffic from site on service road. sign for existing field 419. Site plan to include a y v~ai ~h P.oute 3• e road at intersection on frontag Respectfully submitted, ~! ~ p ~ tioner PETITIONER: JOSEPH A. QUFSEN~ERRY ' CASE N[Il~ER: 16-5/87 J~8 ~- "~7 Planning Camnission Hearing Date: May 5, 1987 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: May 26, 1987 1. RE1;2UEST Petition of Joseph A. Quesenberry to rezone a 0.819 acre parcel from B-1 Business to B-2, Business to operate a swimming pool retail sales and servic business, located at the address of 4347 Old Cave Spring Road in the Windsc Hills Magisterial District. 2. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION There were three people present in opposition at the Planning Ccm[nission Publi Hearing. 3. SIGNIFICANT IMPACT FACTORS a. Poor alignment of intersection. 4. PROFFERED CONDITIONS a. Property to be limited to swimming pool service and supplies and reta: sales. b. Storage trailer at the rear of building will be screened from view by way wooden fencing on three sides. c. Parking of company vehicles will be at the rear of the property. d. No outside storage or sales of swimming pool services and supply equipne will be permitted. 5. COMMISSIONER'S MOTION, WTE AND REASON Mr. Eddy moved to deny the petition stating that due to the location of t property, the present B-1 zoning is a good buffer between the higher intensi businesses and the residential dwellings. The motion carried with the follow: roll call vote: py~; Witt, Eddy, Flippen NAYS: None ABSENT: Jones, Winstead 6. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE a. None. 7. ATTACHMENTS Concept Plan (8~" x 11") Vicinity Map (8~" x 11") Staff Report Other: 1 ~ Robert Stalzer, P1 ning Carnnission Secretary _~ i i i i v o h Y pC ~. ', ~ i_ _ _ __I ~ 1 ~ .. ~ k~ , oB ~~ 1 -- ~ 1 i /~ ~/ y ~. ,y c~ ~ u ~, \ U ~\ .q ~ -~ -{~ --- ~ 1 "' _ ~J / o~ / Mg' / / /, ~~ ~ ~ 0 ~'~ ~ •. / a',' P.. ~~. ti, ~. ~ ~ ~ / / / _, ~~ .~ / ~. 'c N ~ ~L' r ---0 'G \~ I ui tom' n w ~ ~ .V ~ Q ~ _. ~ ~ ~ . . Z ~' ~ ~ ~ z 41 w -+- n ~`- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ W ~ ~' w 2 ~/~gTEP $.~~ -xo3-R~~~. _~- ~ ~, _.~. ~ ..~_: ;z, , Ste` o+ ~ 1. ..1 _ ~1 ~ MT.YE ~ ~ 4l S ~ ~ E~ONHILL ~~ q19` ~~~" ~~ /+ FEMJ yS' ~~ wY ~ ape GIENrAON _ ~~ Vic' w~ ~7( ~/~ ~ 9lVD ~~'; / ~~:",uD(m !~ ~ wick -VICINITY MAP D unQru pNk` ROANOKE COUNTY Joseph A. Quesenberry ' DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT B-1 to B-2 STAFF REPORT s~~-y CASE NUMBER: 16-5/87 PETITIONER: JOSEPH A. QUESENBERRY REVIEWED BY: Bonnie Newlon DATE: 4-30-87 Petition of Joseph A. Quesenberry to rezone a 0.819 acre parcel fron B-1, Business to B-2, Business to operate a swimming pool retail sale: and service business, located at the address of 4347 Old Cave Sprinc Road in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District. 1. NATURE OF REQUEST: a. Conditional proposal to rezone the front property from B-1 tc B-2 to allow the addition of swimming pool retail sales anc service on-site along with the existing business offices of the company Virginia Pool Sales and Service. An R-1 buffer woulc remain along the rear of the property. b. As indicated on concept plan, employee parking and storage o supplies to be at rear of property zoned B-2. Proffers (1 confine B-2 use to swimming pool service and supplies and retai sales; (2) screen storage trailer with wooden fencing on thre sides; (3) confine parking of company vehicles to rear o property; and (4) allow no outside storage or sales. 2. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS a. Commercial development subject to site plan requirement (including screening and buffering) and parking to insur compliance with County regulations. The applicant's site pla was approved for soil and erosion on 12-15-86 and fo construction on 12-18-86. b. Commercial entrance permit required from VDOT; obtained 11-86. 3. SITE CHARACTERISTICS a. Topography: Gently sloped with an existing 1,..800 sq.ft commercial structure. b. Ground Cover: Grass, low growing vegetation and forested buffe between building and area parking/proposed storage area ar between property and residential area adjoining north boundary. 4. AREA CHARACTERISTICS a. Future Growth Priority: Situated within the Windsor Hi l_ Community Planning Area, designated by the Planning Commi"ssii and Board of Supervisors as an area where growth should 1 stabilized. Infill development will continue to occur. b. General area is developed with small offices and townhous~ along Route 1663 (Old Cave Spring Road). McVitty Road feature large lot residential and an associated residential service (d care center). 5. LAND USE IMPACT ASSESSMENT Rating: Rate each factor according to the impact of the proposes action. Use a scale of 1 through 5. 1 = positive impact, 2 = negligible impact, 3 = manageable impact, 4 = disruptive impact, 5 = severe impact, and N/A = not applicable. RATING FACTOR COMMENTS LAND USE COMPATIBILITY 3 a. Comprehensive Plan: 1985 Comprehensive Development Plan ha; placed this area within a Core land use district to a depth o' approximately 200 feet on the property, with the remainder is Neighborhood Conservation. Surrounding uses include Core on the east and south, surface water and flood hazard in the west, an~ Neighborhood Conservation on the north. Commercial uses ar highly compatible in the Core district. Routes 1663 and 166 are minor collectors capable of sustaining low intensity traffi generation (approximately 50 ADT) such as proposed. 3 b. Surrounding Land: Office development, medium intensit residential, residential services (day care), steep slope flood hazard. 3 c. Neighboring Area: Mixed. 3 d. Site Layout: With fulfillment of proffers and screening an buffering on approved site plan, manageable impact. 1 e. Architecture: New commercial building on site. 3 f. Screening and Landscape: Site plan approved. Proffers provid additional screening (fencing for storage on site). Evergree buffer between site and adjoining residential uses should b maintained. 3 g. Amenities: Adequate parking. 3 h. Natural Features: TRAFFIC 3 i. Street Capacities: Traffic generation will be 50 ADT. Currer - usage of both roads is approximately 850 ADT each. Pavemen width is 20 feet. Route 1663 is classified as local/mint collector and Route 1662 as a local street. Futur classification for both is collector. 4 j. Circulation: Poor alignment of intersection. UTILITIES 2 k. Water: Adequate facilities and supply.' - 2 1. Sewer: Adequate lines and treatment capacity. DRAINAGE 2 m. Basin: minimal impact. ~~ ~~ N/A n. 2 0. 2 p. 2 q. 2 r. 1 s. 2 2 2 2 2 6. 7. t. Floodplain: none. PUBLIC SERVICES Fire Protection: Within travel time standard of Cave Spring #3. Rescue: Within travel time standard of Cave Spring #3. Parks and Recreation: Minimal demand. School: Minimal demand. TAX BASE - Land and Improvement Value: $145,000 - Taxable Gross Sales/Year: $300,000 - $400,000 - Total Employees: 9 - Total revenue to the County/Year: Approximately $3,000 ENVIRONMENT Air: u. Water: v. Soils: w. Noise: x. Signage: PLAN CONSISTENCY This area is designated as Core land use. General retail and offi~ activities have high compatibility with the Core district. Tt screening and buffering monitoring of the site plan fulfill a polio objective of the Roanoke County Land Use Plan (C-5). STAFF EVALUATION a. Strengths: (1) Proposal helps to fulfill Land Use Pl< objectives and provides buffer to adjoining residential use Traffic generated is minimal on streets of adequate capacit County tax base is enhanced. . b. Weaknesses: (1> Proffers must be fulfilled to screen on-si storage so that policy objectives of Land Use Plan are fulfill in a mixed use area. L E G A L N O T I C E iven to all interested persons that the ublic hearing at 7:00 Notice is hereby g ervisors will hold a p Board of Sup in the Community Room at the Roanoke Roanoke County May 26~ 1987, S,W,, Roanoke, p,m, on Tuesday, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, requesting County Administration Center, h and Sandra 4tractbcontaining 0.819 Virginia, on the petition of JosepBusiness of a Windsor Hills rezoning from B-1 Business to B-2 ring Road in the acre and located at 4347 Old Cave Sp Magisterial District. ool retail has been requested to operate a swimming p Rezoning ess: The County Planning Commission recommends sales and services busin denial. and amendments of the Zoning Ordinance of Roanokelanunand other A COpY of the petition, site p thereto as well as a COPS request may be examined in the office of the documents related tO ment, located in Room 600 at the Roanoke County Department of Develop Administration Center. ersons County will provide assistance to handicappedu sted to Roanoke s, Such individuals a772r2018) if desiring to attend public hearing the County office of Person~eattendance,<`7031 0 contact special provisions are necessary 1987. Given under my hand this 7th day of May- Deputy Clerk Mary g, Allen, Su ervisors Roanoke County Board of P ublish in the evening edition please p of the Roanoke Times and World News o Tuesday, MaY 12, 1987 Tuesday, MaY 19, 1987 Direct the bill for Publication to: Joseph 4uesenberry p, 0, Box 20006 24018 Roanoke, Virginia page 1 of 2 VIRGINIA: THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY BEFORE ) p,819 acre parcel of land, A ) generally located 4347 Old Cave Road. Formall 3338 McVitt Road) PET- S rin ) within the Windsor PLills District, and ) Magisterial 76.20_1_3 ) Tax Map # recorded as parcel # in the Roanoke County Tax Records.) OF ROANOKE COUNTY: TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS uesenberr WHEREAS, your Petitioner Jose h A. & Sandra C• 21-105 of the Section s ectfully files this petition pursuant to w i th the Code of re p and in accordance County Zoning Ordinance show the Roanoke and would respectfully Virginia of 1950, as amended, the above-referenced parcel of following: 1) The Petitioner is the owner of land. ,r the provisions of the 2) The property is Presently zoned und. Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance as Front B-1 District. is designated 3) The property Roanoke Count in the Future Land Use Guide of the Development Plan. Comprehensive ro erty rezoned <" ur Petitioner now desires to have this p P 4) Yo for the purpose ~ District B-2 Swimmin ool retail Page 2 of 2 that the Zoning requests WHEREFORE, your Petitioner respectfully e amended and that the above-referenced Ordinance of Roanoke County b f land be rezoned as set out in number 4- parcel o that this petition be referred Petitioner requests for its FURTHER, your Commission ecretary to the Roanoke County Planning by the S consideration and recommendation. Respectfully submitted, oner VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY A 0•~?9 acre parcel of land, generally located 437 Old Cave Cave Spring Road within the !~!inc':sor ~iylls Page 1 of 2 RECOMMENDATION Magisterial District, and ) recorded as parcel # 76.20-1-?.3 ) in the Roanoke County Tax Records.) TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY: WHEREAS, your Petitioner Joseph and Sanc~r~ flop Pnharr~( has filed with the Secretary to the Planning Commission a petition to rezone the above-referenced parcel of land from C-1, Eusiness District to B-2, Eusiness District for the purpose of operating a swir~mina pool retail sales and services business. WHEREAS, the petition was referred to the Planning Commission which, after due legal not'.ce as required by Section 15.1-431 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended, did hold a public hearing on flay 5 , 19 87 and WHEREAS, at that public hearing all parties in interest were afforded an opportunity to be heard; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due consideration has recommended to the Board of County Supervisors that the rezoning be denied. Due to the location of the rop rty~ tE1P prPSPnt n ~ inning ;c a gnnri buffer between the higher in n~ity hllClnPCCaC anri the cPc; Pnt' ~'~~~ellin~S Page 2 of 2 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commissi recommends to the Board of County Supervisors that the abov~ referenced parcel of land remain zoned B-1, ~iusiness District. The above action was adopted motion of Lee C. Eddy -,- brr -second - 3 -------------------------------- and upon the following recorded vote AYES: Glitt, Eddy, Flippen NAYS: done ABSENT: Jones, l~Jinstead Respectfully submitted, Secretary Roanoke County Planning Commission co s s ~a u; ~- U 0 v-- v~ Q 0 w 0 a a- Q ~~~~-~ Page 1 of 2 VIRGINIA: OF ROANOKE COUNTY BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS land, ) 0 ~1g acre parcel of A Old Cave ) generally located a.3~~7 Road FINAL ORDER Spr~na ) ~,indsor I-fills within the ~ ) Magisterial District, and 76.20-1-1~ ) recorded as parcel # the Roanoke County Tax Records ) in OF ROANOKE COUNTY: TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS our Petitioner s h ~ the above- to rezone WHEREAS, Y Supervisors the Board of County did petition -1 land from the Pure°Se arcel of District for referenced P Jusiness business. B-2~ services District to ool retail sales and a swimminn p did hold operating the Planning Commission of legal notice, time, due 19 87, at which WHEREAS, after May 5, the petition on be heard; and a public hearing of an Opportunity to were given O f County in interest th e Boar d all parties eration, f u l l c o n s i d with the attached WHEREAS, after appxoved 'sors determined that the rezoning be Supervi arcel of proffer of Conditions. ORDERED that the aforementione P BE IT Tax Maps as Parcel NOW, THEREFORE County in the Roanoke describes is contained 5`15 and legally land, which q~~ in Deed Book District t' 7 ~ 20 _ - ~ ~,nd recorded g-1, Business bel~~w, be rezoned from District- R_2, 3usiness Legal Description of Property: The Legal Description of Property is attached here with-1N I-.. ~ Page 2 of 2 BE IT FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this or the Secretary of the p der be transmitted lannin to 9 Commission and that he be directed reflect that chap e g on the official zonin to ADOPTED g maP of Roanoke County, on motion of Supervisor Garrett and upon the following recorded vote: AYES; Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson ~ NAYS; None ABSENT: None ~~ ~d Roanoke DPPuty County Board of Su ~ Clerk pervisors 5/27/87 CC: Director of Plannin Department g~ Zoning, Grants of Development Real Estate Assessor Comm: 86-548 ,~c~ `~' ,~ ,tom Deed description for property (0.819 acres) to be rezoned crom B-1 to yB-2, owner Joseph A. Quesenberry and Sandra Quesenberr BEGINNING at Corner northerl #l, said point being located on the y right-of-way of Virginia Secondar (formerly U.S. Route 221), said Y Route 1663 southwesterly corner of the Allen R point also being the point being located S 84° 17, ~~ Moran property, said existing highway monument• 50 W, 62.67 feet from an and with Virginia Secondarthence leaving the Moran property 97.20 feet to Y Route 1663, S 84° 17' 50" W, #2; thence leavin existing highway monument, being Corner the northerl g Virginia Secondary Route 1663 and with y right-of-way of Old Cave Spring Road (formerly Old Virginia Route 119) for the followin 41° 45' 30" w, 9.77 feet to an existin g 2 courses, N being Corner #3; thence with a g highway monument said curve is defined b curve to the left which a radius of 517.46 Y a delta angle of 16° 50' 40", and bearing N 50 ~ an arc of 152.13, a chord of 151.60 iron pin; said ° 10 ~ 50~~ W, to Corner point being the southeasterl #4, an existing of Honey Tree Child Care Center Y property corner thence leavin (Deed Book 1223, Page 410); boundar g Old Cave Spring Road and with the easterly y line of Honey Tree Child Care Center, N 9 00" w. 83.93 feet to Corner 07' Tree Child Care Center #4A, thence leaving the Honey through the Property and with a rezoning line C, YrOpNr ~ o17Joseph A. Quesenberry and Sandra Quesenberr 50 6A, said point located on E, 222.03 feet to Corner the Allen R. Moran the westerly boundary line of boundar Property; thence running with the westerly y line of the Moran Property, feet to Corner #1, the S 3° 27' 00~~ E. 200.00 containing 0,819 actual Place Of BEGINNING, and acres., as more particularly shown on a plat prepared by Buford T. Lumsden & Engineers-Surveyors, dated April g, 1987• Associates, p,C,~ VIRGINIA: ~~~-~ BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY A 0•,819 acre parcel of land, ) generally located 4347 Old Cave SDrin > _Road, formally 3338 McVitty Road S W ) PROFFER ~' ) OF ~ _ within the ~ Windsor H; 11 s ) CONDITIONS Magisterial District, and ) recorded as parcel # 76.20-1-t3 ) in the Roanoke County Tax Records. ) ~ TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY: u; ~- Being in accord with Sec. 15.1-491.1 et se ~ q. of the Code of U Virginia and Sec. 21-105E. of the Roanoke County Zoning 0 N Ordinance, the Petitioner Joseph A. & Sandra C Quesenberr o hereby voluntarily proffers to the Board of Supervisors of w o Roanoke County, Virginia the following conditions to the rezoning o._ ~ of the above-referenced parcel of land: 1.) Property to be limited to swimming pool service and supplies and retail sales. 2.) Storage trailer at the rear of building will be screened from view by the way of wooden fencing on three sides. 3.) Parking of company vehicles will be at the rear of the property. 4.) No outside storage or sales of swimming pool services and supply equip- ment be permitted. Respectfully submitted, f -C , ~titioner ~ ~ ~. -5g~- y Va ~?~ I ~ ~Q ~~ ~ ~6 i ~~~uQ~~~~~~ ~~e~ ,~-~ ~~ ~ ~~ c~.~. ~ g~ ~+ Q~ p, p P E A RAN C E R E Q U E S T 1 / L~t,~iw~=cx ~~ V PUBLIC HEARING ON s~ 7- ~ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so that I may comment. I agree to follow the guidelines listed below. WHEN CALLED 7`0 THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORL> . 1. Each speaker will have betwasnanhindividualvorminutes available whether speaking representative. The fhcitizenslspeakingeonhantissue,mand based on the number o the majority of will enforce the rule unless instructed by the Board to do otherwise. 2, Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. 3. All comments must b~ andeaudiencetmembersdis notaallowedeen a recognized speake 4. Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. 5, Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. (, INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TTENPAUTHORIZATIONGFROMETHERGROUPHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRI ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. P L E A S E W R I T E L E G I B L Y NAME: ADDRESS: PHONE: PLEASE NOTE: (After filling out, give to the Deputy Clerk. Thank you.) ~~~-~-~~ A P P E A RAN C E R E Q U E S T ' G' % 4 i' i ka: ~ PUBLIC HEARING ON ~ - the Board of Supervisors to I would like the Chairman of tter so me during the public hearing on the above ma recognize uidelines listed I agree to follow the g that I may comment. ED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND below. WHEN CALL ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. er will have between thindividualvorminuteSmlt 1, Each speak Baking as an the time 11 available whether sP on an issue, and re resentative. The chairman will eakinge ority of p the maJ based on the thsbrulefunlesseinstructed by will enforce the Board to do otherwise. their point of limited to a presentation of Speakers will be ns of clarification may be entertained by 2• Questio view only. the Chairman. Debate between to the Board. ker and audience members is not allowed. 3 , All cominenta Sues be directed a recognize P at all kers and the audience will exercise courtesy 4, Both spec times. statements S Bakers are requested to leave any written 5. P and/or comments with the cler . ING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORG FROM THE GROUPHALL 6. INDIVIDUALS PURPORT WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FILE WITHTHEEINDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. ALLOWING p LEA S E W R I T E L E G I B L Y /~ ~ ' i NAME: ~;~ ~~~~~ !-~~ fib ~. Fyrj_ ADDRESS: PHONE : ~ ~ ~ . ~, ~` ~`,; out, give to the Deputy pLEASE NOTE: (After f1Thank you.) Clerk. n~ ~~ rEMttR NATION~I SN~NII INStITrIE Y IRGINIA POOL SA~.~S ~ ~cn v ~~.c P. O. BOX ~oo~ ROANOKE, VA. a~lv t S 1 T031 774 - 5992 M~) Ike Sutphin - Refinish Antiques $ -1 Andra Perdue - Perdue Exterminator g~t Lemon & Lambdon - Realtors esthesiolo A gy ~~~ n Vincent T. Basile M.D. - ii =~ Inc . Lawrence & Company, B ~~~' Air Filters System 8~~ USF & G Insurance ~~~ Inc. Western Energy, g-1 Hot.Z Food Marts g-1 Landmark Property ~_~ Jerry Kirk & Associates ~ 1 Security Consultants Ltd. M I 7 3 Dick's Auto Body rn - Aplieme Manufacturer t _ j3 - Z ~ M°1 e Southeas Cave Spring Drive Inn - Bar ~'2 Helens Secreterial Service ts bi ~~~ ~ I • ne Brumfield Custom Homes & Ca g _~ Adrel Stone - School of Dance Cave Spring Veterinary Clinic F3 2 3 ~5~?-~ e 4 ~ ~ f 4 i ~a/~u~ ~.~C~ng~nml~fx®A~ann q~~ 4g®9 'Ua-nve ~uxa°nmm~ ll.ame: ~. ~i' . ®a~n®fls~, Vn~~nanaa ~~®Il~ May 26, 1987 Members: Roanoke County Board of Supervisors The residents surrounding the property of Virginia Pools on OZd Cave Spring Road oppose the rezoning of the property from B-1 to B-2. The following reasons should be considered: 1. AZZ residents whose property touches or surrounds the property oppose the rezoning. 2, Mr. Quisenberry should have applied for rezoning before he obtained his building permit, not 30 days after moving into his new location. 3. With the new zoning Mr. Quisenberry wouZdoobe abnt,tmuratic highly fZamabZe resins, a catalyst for p p acid, chlorine and other chemicals. 4. The B-2 zoning would allow the large moving van on his property. This is very noticeable six months out of the year. It would also allow business hours at night and on weekends. 5. This property was turned down for rezoning in April, 1986 from B-1 to R-5 because the residents opposed any rezoning. 6. As you can see from the letter from Mr. Len Boone, my property value would be adversely affected. My townhouses have a $505,000 MAI appraisal value, my residence has a $300,000 MAI appraisal value and th~apsa~evaZueeofe$105~000 house and the townhouses has an app for a total value of $910,000. 7. Tim GabarZa admitted that the property in question should not haveobn~inalresidentsbshouZdtno~obeupenaZazedlfornth~s The surr 9 mistake. g. In talking with Mr. Quisenberry while he was grading (but before he applied for a building permit) he said he was only building an office and had no plans for a retail store or warehouse on the property in question. He said he has two other warehouses which he used for storage. pp gIlflRIID®~~~$1 ~~gy9 ~• ~Il~6J ~P~nen~~ann~9 ~^~. 4g®9 ~"~ ~4®9~ ®aan®~~' ~n~~atuna Hoke County Board of Supervisors Roa M ye 26, 1987 tial around a residen in is a so f ter eZO oun~ y zoned it that way in T and that is ~ he reason th area lace• the first P otio~•.~ for your consider - ~ r-~ Thank you y~,"~.~1~!J~"''`'~, ,~~~„x_. Higginbotham pawl R• .; ~ ~ 1~:. ~ ~ ~ -- ~ ~V l,. ~~ , ~ ~r~{ --_`_ - ~ ~irL ~; lc^~c~r~~rb» ~a~/Y~" ~~; . ~,, / ~ ~ ~ ,~.~ ~~~ i -~ cam, v-~~ ~~ ./ a ,~c~; (~ 3 ~~~~ ~~A~~~ov~" '~ ,3 , ~ , ~ ?~~~~~.~ .%/ J 1 ~/ .,~ ~. , ~ i ,y ~ ~~. r , -~ i May 18, 1987 Mr. Paul Higginbotham 4909 Cave Spring Lane, S.W. Roanoke, VA 24018 Dear Paul: The B-1 zoning that exists now in the general neighborhood of your townhome property on Old Cave Spring Lane does not really nega- tively impact the value of your townhome property. The pool equip- ment company's use of that property in a B-2 capacity will in all probability negatively impact your values. I can tell you the existence of a moving van behind the property does cause an adverse effect. Your values will remain much more secure if the zoning in the area remains B-l. nce BOQNE & ~O1f'IPANY, REALTORS l,~'ri Boon Presiden GLB/nms ^ Main Office / Rt. 419 ^ 460 East Office 3922 Electric Road, S. W. (Rt. 419), Roanoke, VA 24018 3548 Orange Ave., N.E. (Rt. 460), Roanoke, VA 24012 P.O. Box 8614, Roanoke, VA 24014 P.O. Box 11963, Roanoke, VA 24022 (703)989-0863 (703) 343-5800 Roanoke's lyumber One Real Estate Company R ALT RE