HomeMy WebLinkAbout2/23/1988 - RegularLAW OFFICES
OSTERHOUDT, FERGUSON, NATT, AHERON ~ AGEE
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
1919 ELECTRIC ROAD. S. W.
P. O. BOX 20068
CHARLES H. OSTERHOUDT
MICHAEL 5. FERGUSON ROANOKE, VIRGINIA
EDWARD A. NATT 24018- 1699
MICHAEL J. AHERON
G. STEVEN AGEE
MARK D. KIDD March 1 , 1988
Ms. Mary Allen, Clerk
Board of Supervisors
County of Roanoke
P. O. Box 29800
Roanoke, VA 24018 -
Dear Mary:
TELEPHONE
703-774-1197
Enclosed please find the Certificate of Publica-
tion for the public hearing on the Peters Creek Road project
of the Hobart Company. Please place this with your records.
If you have any questions, give me a call. With
best personal regards, I am
Very truly yours,
OSTERHOUDT, FERGUSON, NATT,
AHERON 8 AGEE, P.C.
Edward A. Natt
/bp
Encl.
cc: Mr. Bruce Hobart
P. O. Box 2811?
Richmond, VA 23228
THE BOARD OF SUPERTYSADMINISTRATION
AT THE REGULAR MEETING OF ~rgE ROANOKE COUN 1988
VIRGINIA, HELD AT gEBRUARY 23,
COUNTY, CENTER ON TUESDAY,
A M E N D E D
2388-7.c REQUESTI ARTMENTP OFNCE OF
RESOLUTION 2
HILL DRIVE INTO THE VIRYIROADDSYSTEM
TRANSPORTATION SECONDAR
the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
gE IT RESOLVED by
County, Virginia, as follows: tance of
f requesting accep
1. That Resolution 6987-12• S stem is hereby
• 1 Drive into the VDOT Secondary Road Y
Hil
me this day to be heard upon the
rescinded.
2. That this matter ca a
nd upon the application for Hill Drive.
proceedings therein a 636)-
xtending from Glade Creek Drive (Route
road e in a
section of and extending
files east of Bonsack Road (Route 603) - ac- pursuant to
0.79 m to the cul de s
southerly direction 0.29 miles
ra h D and funded pursuant to Section
Section 33.1-72.1, Parag p 1950, as
raph A of the Code of Virginia of
33.1-75.1- Parag
amended. the Commonwealth of
3. That this Board does guarantee
ri ht-of-way of 50 feet with necessary
Virginia an unrestricted g
in Plat Book 9, Page 54. dated
easements for drainage as recorded
e 205 recorded on July
and Deed Book 1269 Pag
16, 1975 Clerk s
December County Circuit Court
31, 1987 of record in the Roanoke
that this road was open to
Office.
That this Board does certify to
4• at which time it was open
ublic use prior to January 1, 1976,
P
and used by motor vehicles•
L. r.~ , 1 ~~ '~ C...
`~41 »~'~
t'UcLl~hii~;-: ~ r
t,L,U~T Y ~r r~u?~iVl~t~1=
~E~~T ut- hi~r',T b bUUu~T
L.. Cj U X L `i iV :i L) 7 y CJ
V N ~! `t `J 1 J
r(UMiVIiKL ~
jTNft_ iJF Virlal~vlr
L 1 (Y l F' ilC.Hl`ai.1Kc
r,Fr-IU:;V1T ur t~vULll,r1 i~J'J
.Lv'-., ,.. r'.J
i 1;.' ~ ~ u ~;;.
j (Nt_ U dUtitJ l a~V•~l1 t n~ti Ur'r' 1(.',.K i.ir
1 r L~JtZNuKATIUiti, t~N1LN 1•,uK-
Tli~":E~-WOtZLu ~~. Tt1t 'r:lJ?I~Vu't<~
Ni.;tlNTlJi~i 1J F'U~L1JN~tt ivCrr~j~.;NC~
. ~, y ~ ;~;~tL~-~~t~a, r ;;,riLY ~t~T~. ur
t ., ~~ 1~~~ The= ,,
~UULiJ'r1tl~ liv K~rii'Jl)~L',
rji~ 1,tr<t iF'Y 1Fsr~i Tti~ i-+~~iV~~~~
\l1tZl~1{'vlkl t'U;~LiJ11CJ l.v Jr-li`v Jtr~JE'i-1~"::K:a
~uT II,E r;tiS v,Tt
v~/Lb/~~ i9U~iVlijh
JL~20~~+i3 C~'~-~IV1Vl~
.~ ITia~:~5+
Y lyc~~
~~~1r+ ;;~Y ur rL-oKu
T ri -~
_ - -- ~' ~ luiVN t U~~-----
OrF ii,~1Z
OFBBORROWING
bn the xfrd dsY of February,
19~, the Bosrd of Supervisors
of the t:ountY of Roanoke, Vir-
"glnia, adopted s resolutolf n en-
the
xltled '~Resoluflon
Bosrd of SuPervlso Vi otnia,
County of Roanoke
Authorizing tha Isss ~TeReva
t96g Qpp Wafer SY
'.'r;ue Bond, Series 1g8lA, end
Setttnp Forth the Form snd
petsils Th f er which the Bo tp
The Purposed to be iuued
is DroPo funds to finance ex-
provlde s exist-
' fenslons of th i rtountY'
tng were Wlltl be in fhe msxl-
~~ Bnn prlndPe- em°uof of
v ,•~~'~' Allen,
*, Marv H.
Deputy Clark oof the oard
M~, of Superv1sonnoka,
-" County of Roo
Vlrgints
T; 1135~~ ---
t _T 1 itil ~ J L ih li f( I_ ~ " ••~+'- /i J
hUH~`vi.1".i:
LO~i:S~o~
}+~ «'l CJhiGLK
rct - ~1~3.7b
PUbU15nc~~~
KV~fdUKc ~UU~T'Y
L~Ai~;J i)F jUPtKVISJKS
3738 ~RnM~I.~Tuty Sr+
P tJ iUX zyduu
rlU ~l fyU~C ~}i L`tU 1~
jTHTE OF V'IF~vI~viH
CI7Y uF R~y~f~ll;rCc
HFFIDriVIT lF PUBLIC!~TiuN
Hid ~rFlt,Et; Ut=
1 , (TNc iii~utkJ IuNtU 1 .,
Ui~Purtr+T I()ivt rNI(.H ~Uit-
T 1MtS-r+UkLU L 1 Nt tiu.+ viJit~
PUKHTiilI`+ IS PUt;i_ISHtK Ur Y ~;twSPNPtt<
~, 'wUf<Ut-~~~rtiS• A VA1~ STi~l'E Ut~
T IN'~c5 IN THC
pU~LIStitli iiv Ku~tiUKE,THAT THE At~fvExE
vi+~+~ii~1A, UU "~c"`T iFY I~ SHiu ;v'tvrSPAPtI+
~vuT ILz: wN~ -'UJI.ISNLU
~fv TH= "r-ULLu>nliv~.~ ~,;TCS
Ul/09/urs
Ur'/ lt~/8o
U2/u5/a~
u~/lb/b8
wITNrSS+
,~IUxidINU
MuK~Iti~~
cVtfvlivv
CV [iV I~V~
TNIJ ~17Tr1 Ui.Y t1~ i-EdKU++nY ly8d
- - t.:iZ'S SIViVNTU
~FFIC
COON YT OF ROANOKE
PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE OF INTENT
TO ISSUE
REVENU NOTES IpAT10N
please be advised that t Cf
Board of SuDervlsors
Roanoke County, at Its meet-
Inp on February ~,1~' at the
Roanoke County Administra-
tion Center, 3138 Brsmbleton
Avenue, Roanoke, Virplnia, at
the evenin0 session be0inublic
~~~ D•mcn the followin0 met-
hearinD
ter, to-wit: TREA-
AUTHORIZING THE
SURER TO ISSUE Ur TO
MILLIONNOTES TO GO~.
pprERAT10Of ~ ~
CITSMMICH pURING THE
RIENCED
CURRENT FISCAL YEAR
ry Of tM WbHc Inter-
~ A11 mamba
ested In tae aDPearsand be
above m Y lace
heard at the time and P
aforesald• MshoneY
Paul M•
County Attorney oVirplnia
Roanoke County,
(13585)
TIMES L r.VKL~-,~cr,;
k~ li r '~v'.J h C
rev ('U~~it.~tri - ~U~Isi~S
io 7.2i3
pUULISHcK'S i-E~ -
KUHivUKc ~-UU~rT Y
cUAKU uF SLF'tRV I JURS
373i:i r~f;A,~ilLCTt)iv 5w
~ G i;UX 29oUu
Kt;AJUht V! Z4u 1~
ST;~Tt OF vlKUiiviA
CITY Cf- itU~NUKt
HFF1ti,UiT uF PUi~LI~HTisJN
ivUcRSIUNtU1 H'v JFi-I~,EK OF
19 l THE U ~,H IC~i UU~t-
TI~1tS-wUfZLU ~,UrCPUKiaTIU~'v• ttu~+NJKE
PUnHT IUN IS PUULISttth uF THt
~vt`v~t5• ~ vNiLY IVtwSPNP~F
TIr~ES L wi;ttt_U- IN Trit STATE
PUt~LISHEU iiv KtJAt~UKc•
UU ~,EKTIFY TNNT TFic r;fvivt/+tU
v Iit~INIA+ I;V SAID N~v~SPAti•'trtS
ivtT ICE hr1S PU;:iL ISHcD
ptv 1Hc FCLLuv,i'vv v,~TtS
Ut/09/8
U2/lb/88
CZ/09/8n
uZ/Ib/~~
W1~JESSr
~UKNIivU
MuKNI''v`v
tVtNl~v~
cVCt'~Ii~v
T H UriY" UFrtukUiaK'( 198u
ThI`
~~
~_ ____
ifi'K'va~_-_-----'
---- ~ 5 j I'vNi+T i.JRt
Ur'FILEK
NOTICE OF PUBLIC
HEARING ON PROPOSED
BOND FINACOUNTY,
ROANOKE
VIRGINIA
Ivan that t of
Notice Is haofebSypervivir9inis
goard County,
Roanoke „) wlll hold s
(the "County in accordance
~ publlc~tiOnn~s.l_171.1 of the
with t Vir9lnle of 1950, es
Codas the Is~nds not
amended, on (the
panerel oblipS3 985.E fo es'
to .exceed County
"Bonds") of the fenovattons
slat in flnsncin ants to Back
end imPrsvem I and
Creek Elementar E~mantarY
gent Msunteln uthoriz-
School. A resslutlon s Bonds
In0 the Issuance of th by the
will be considered at Ifs
Board of Supervisors
maefln9 on February ~~ 19M~
A copy of such resolution lu~°fy
file In fhe office of the Co
Adminlsfrh8a~in0, which meY
The Public edlourned,
ba eontlnued sr venln0 ses-
will be held et then 7.00 p,m.,
sloe be9lnnin0 ~ lgdq,
Tuesday, Februs of Suparvl-
before the goard m
sore, In fhe ComrnunitY Roo
of the Roanoke County 37~
ministrsfion Cant Avenue,
Brambleton
Roanoke, Vir0lnia.
Paul M. Mahoney
County Attorney sVirOi'~ta
~ Roanoke County,
(17125)
nJr~~Jn
b1b1.1L
PJGL IStiL-~' ~ FFt -
K~r+wJt~E CUuNTY
;:~A;tL1 tJr SUF'trtV l JurtJ
373~s oKk;°iuLtTu^i 5~"
P U ~JX L )tSU
RJ~NOKL UA Z4Uit;
ST~Tt uF Vln~irslk
a„i7Y uF KGA~vJK~
;aF-i=lu,ViT i.:F PUULICr`+TIJN
Nt~ 1
I+ Div ~t~F ICtK Uf-
-
,
I , l Tr1'~ u;aU<=rte
KPLiRa71JNr wH I ~N t;vrc
V~~
TIMt~-'~UkLJ ~v
IJ P~.Jr/LISi~Lri GF =
THt KOAti
~vt'rrSi~r~P
~i-
~ UF;ILY
Pi:;;tH(IuN
f Ir1E~ I. W;;k~J-;v'c'wJ• jiv T1-ic jT;~Tt
t
.v tJarrJrt
, iNN
PUbLI~H`tJ I .
U l;c1ZTIrY f T~` ~trvivtxLu
tw+SP~+Pt~~
. 'vIA9 U
V1rZvI~
Pu~t.ljNrJ IN AIG N
i~;UT ICE. tHr+~
FULL'u ~vl~'~ UATt~
.Jr~ THc
iZ/~y/bG
uL/lb/its
~;~/lo/~~
~ I rrvts5+
i~Jivl~'J~
i"1UKiJIi'tiv
LVt~vlti~
t'V cN l;v~
T~1,_ 7TN u,Y ur FL~KJAhY i9uo
.~
iY --~
---- uf=FICLn' S 5lvivi~TUi `_
N pRppOSED
HEARINGFINANCING BY
BOND COUNTY'
ROANOKE
VIRGINIA
Notice Is hereby Olven thst t of
Board of SuDervis~~°IrOinia
Rosnoke County,
(the ~~CountY"~ will hold a
public hearin0 in aceordsnce
with Section 15.1-171. 1950 t as
Code of VIr0lnia of
emended' on thReuenue Bond
Water~^td°,mof the Counri In
(the ~~
a DrlnciPel a to finance exten-
ceed f975,000 's existin0
sions of the C p resolution su-
water system.
thorizin0 the Issuance of the
Bond will be considered bs tits
Board of Supervisor's
meeting on Februsrv ~~ 1~'
p coPY of such resolution is on
file In the office of the County
Administrator. which may
The Dublic hearing, adjourned,
be continued or
will beheld at the evening s°S"
slon be0lnnin0 at 7:00 D.m•,
Tuesday, February ~ 1~'
before the Board of Supervi-
~ sots, in the CommuNri Room
of the Roanoke County 3
ministratlon Canter,
Avenue,
Brsmble y~r0lnle.
RoaPs I M. Mahoney
Counri Attorney °VIr0lnia
Roanoke Counri,
(107931 -
r<; ~ ;'a .; ~.
DbU~;-SU
~J~I.ISNEk' ~ Fc~ -
kGA~vuKE EUUN(Y _
:j738 'SKia(~o1.cTJ~y Sw
U ~~x zy~oo
VM ~~OL~
Kili+ryuRE
~TMTE uF V1k~I;vl++
i;ITY iF RCr'+~vuKE
r,FFIUi~ViT OF PUdLICiTiu~a
~, ~~ a r: L ~.; - i a ~ ,•,
T IitS
EkSI~itiEU)
C; r
i~~ OFFICE.k
k-
UNU
1 r 1 THE AT IiJty•
J Lur~F'vk wNIGN t,u
tZuAPr'01«
TIN+ES-wukL
VF
TIOiv IS NtJt~LI~HcR
:; j~
PUkF~ THE
Y ivcYiJF'r+NEk
IL
~~EwSr
T I;~ES c: wGkLJ-"' I',v
y K~F~ivUKEr 7~Tt vF
TriE
HNCVtx~-~
Ic
PUr~LiSHED
TN
0 ~,EkTLFY
T Trit
tiVEw1SPA1'cfi«
VIiGIiVIIar
L'v
PutiLlStiLJ Sr+IU
fv~TICE wNS
TH: FtJELuw1~'V ~r+TES
J~v
v2/~~/~~ i~1~k(vI ~U
vZ/ Ib/~~ ~Jk~aLN~
'7TH UF+Y uF FcbRUHkY Lyd~
wlTfvEjSr iHI~ ___-
,~/J ~
---, - , - jlJivATU
uF~=I~-ck S
~ NOTICE
advised that the
Please beof SuParvlsors of
Board County, et its meet-
Roanoke ~ ty~, at the
InOonFebruerY Adminlstrs-
Roanoke Coup Y~ Bramblston
lion Center, Vlrplnia,st
Avenue, Roanoke, inning
the evenln0 session beo ublic
7c00 p•m; will hold • P mat-
hearlno on the following
ter, to-wit: AMENDING
ORDINANC21-73 7HE
SECTION COON TF CODE,
ROANOKE ELDER-
L X AND ID SABLED PER-
50NS," AND REENACTING
SAME, TO INCREASE THE
TOTAL COMBIN COMB NED
AND TOTAL VlS10N5
NET WORTH PRO t forth
All members of the Pyblic Inter-
ested in the matter N
above msY sDDear endls e
heard st the time and P
afareseld. Mahoney
Paul M•
County Attorney °Vir0lnia
Roanoke County,
(14270)
~
~ ~ ~
N
~ +s O
N 3
0
+~
~ c~
~ ~
•~ +~
•~ o
~~
+~
~ +~
~ N
~~
m ~
N O ~
~ ~ ~
3
~ ~ O
~3
N N
~ ~
~
+~ cn
w~
O CT
•.~ n•
~ ~
a
o +~ o
U N U
~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~
cd CQ
~ ~ ~
~
~
~ ~
3 -Ui N
N
~ m ~
~ ~~
~ ~ ~ c~
~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ N~ H
b ~
N ~
3 ~
H ~+
o~ PpAkO,p~`
2 ~~~
a ~ ~~
~~~~ ~
~s ~.~ ss
SFSQUICENSENN`P~
a sw~~r~is.x~^^~^g ROANORE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
ACTION AGENDA
FEBRUARY 23, 1988
Regular
Board of Supervisors meeting. at 3:00
Welcome to the Roanoke County and the fourth Tuesday
meetings are held on the second Tuesday m on the fourth Tuesday
p,m, Public Hearings ions fromethisaschedule.will be announced.
of each month. Deviat
WORK SESSION (2:00 P•M•~
Drainage
TO APPROVE THE DRAINAGE Mp'INTENNDCTHATITHEOUSE OFDNONEVIOLENT
HCN/SAM
PRIORITIZEDELUSED INDTHE PROJECTJECURCA
OFFENDERS B
AFTERNOON SESSION
A.
OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M•~
1, Roll Call.
2, Invocation: The Reverend Alan RowbotChurch
Unity of Roanoke Valley
3, Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag.
E UESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA
B, R 4
ITEMS.
PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS AND AWARDS
C.
NDERSON PRESENTED A FRAMED LETTNGING INNTHETADMINISTRATOION
FRED A
PRESIDENT REAGAN TO THE COUNTY FOR H
CENTER
p, NEW BUSINESS ency
1, Approval of ResolutioneS~gaySa1~ortionFoaegarnhardt
Management Agency to r
Creek.
LG/SAM TO APPROVE RESO
THERE HAVE BEEN 2 MEETINDATIONH,rOP'THEAGRAYSON COMMISSION
MCG~=-
ANNEXATIAND OCTOBERAKE A RECOMME
IN JULY
NTACTED THE GEORGE MASON IpMENT~TEINVITEDAANOTHER
ROBERS: HAS CO
ME-- ET W TH ROBERS T~ENDUDY ECONOMIC DEVEL
BOARD MEMBER TO A
AND ECH AND MET WITH THEIRFUOUpIALOGRTS FROM AREA
GARRETT. HE
LOC-- p,L ES AND HAVE ESTABLISHED MEANING
I. CONSENT AGENDA
p,LL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THBE ROUTINEAANDDWILLEBE TED
CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO
ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION ES THE FORM OR FORMS L E
IRED. THAT ITEM WILL BE D
BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS D
MOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDE
RE
SEPARATELY.
REQUESTED THAT ITEM I-1 BERCULLED FOR DISCUSSION
LG U
LG/RR WITH ITEM 1 DELETEC
1, Confirmation of Comn-ittee Appointments to the
Grievance Panel and Transportation aid Safety
Commission.
IS APPOINTMENT TO THE GRIEVANCE PANEL REPLACE JOE
LG ASKED THAT H
RIMES, NOT RICHARD ROBERS.
BLJ/RCN TO APPROVE AS AMENDED - URC artment of
2 , Notification from the Vi Og 491miles of Route 19 50
Transportation that the ted into the
(Forest Edge Drive) has been accep
Secondary System.
tance of Hill Drive, Airpoint
artment of
3, Request for accep
Drive and Airpoint Road into the Va. Dep
S stem.
Transportation Secondary Y
Acceptance of water and Sn`n1eCenterllties serving
4.
Hollins-Plantation Shoppl g
Acce tance of water and sewer facilities serving
5• p Section 3.
Meadow Creek,
3
6. Acceptance of Old Manor Drive and Old Manor Court,
Plantation Estates into the Va. Department of
Transportation Secondary System.
7. Approval of a Raffle Permit for the Botetourt
Jaycees.
g. Resolution from the Planning Commission
recommending approval of acquisition of 5.1779
acre tract for fire and rescue facilities in the
Back Creek community planning area.
9. Approval to close out Va. Division of Historic
Landmark grant for roof replacement on the Old
County Courthouse.
J, CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS
K, REPORTS
1. Accounts Paid for January. 1988.
2. Board Contingency Fund
3. General Fund Unappropriated Balance
4. Capital Unappropriated Balance
5. Statement of Treasurer's Accountability as of
January 31, 1988.
6. Financial Statements as of January 1, 1988
HCN/SAM MOTION TO DIRECT THAT ECH AND COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE
ESTABLISH A PROGRAM TO ENSURE THAT ALL CITIZENS ARE PAYING
PERSONAL PROPERTY TAX AND PURCHASING AUTO DECALS. ECH TO BRING
BACK REPORT ON 3/8/88 - URC
BLJ ASKED WHETHER THE COUNTY COULD USE THE CAPITAL
UNAPPROPRIATED BALANCE FOR OUR OBLIGATION TO THE AIRPORT
BLJ ASKED FOR REPORT ON HOW MANY UNFILLED POSITIONS EXIST BY
DEPARTMENT
7. Status of Starkey Road Improvement Project
L~ EX1C344VEa)E1S(Personnel)t 2o(RealCEstate)Vlandn6a
2.
(legal)
LG/BLJ AT 3:45 P.M. - URC
OUT OF EXECUTIVE SESSION - 5:25 P.M. - LG/BLJ - URC
4
FyFNTN SESSION (7:00 P.M.)
M. PUBLIC HEARINGS
288_1 petition of BRp,MBLETON MEDICAL ASSOCIATES to amend
the Roanoke County Land Use Plan and to rezone a
1.48 acre tract from R-1, Residential to B-1,
Business to construct a parking lot, located south
of 3142 Brambleton Avenue in the Cave Spring
Magisterial District. (CONTINUED FROM JANUARY 26,
1988.)
RR/BLJ TO DENY AMENDMENT TO LAND USE PLAN - URC
RR/BLJ TO DENY REZONING - URC
288-2 Public Hearing on Ordinance aEXEMPTIONeFOR ELDERLY
of the Roanoke County Code, "
AND DISABLED PERSONS" and reenacting same to
increase the total combined income and total
combined net worth provision.
NO ONE SPOKE
288-3 Public Hearing for citizen input on local
community development and housing needs, and on
the proposed application for COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
BLOCK GRANT FUNDING FOR TWEEDS INC. economic
development project.
HCN/SAM TO APPROVE RESO - URC
288-4 Petition of GEORGE JACOB to rezone a 0.678 acre
tract from B-2, Business to M-1, Industrial to
assemble musical accessories, located at 6024
Williamson Road in the Hollins Magisterial
District.
BLJ/HCN TO APPROVE WITH FIRST 3 PROFFERS ONLY - URC
288_5 Petition of JONES TIESJASSOCIATESItoEvacatelaECTS
and MEDICAL PROPER w .known as Jones
portion of a 25 foot right-of- aY roximately
Street from Peters Creek Road west app
170 feet in the Catawba Magisterial District.
SAM/RR TO APPROVE - URC
288_6 Petition of BARBAul-de sacTonlPonde~osacCircle in
portions of the c
the Cave Spring Magisterial District.
RR/BLJ TO APPROVE - URC
288-7
Petition of UNG gu0iness to Be2oBusiness5tocre
tract from B 1,
operated a conveniencthetWindsoraHellstMagisterial
Brambleton Avenue
District.
LG/SAM TO APPROVE - URC
288-8
Petition of the HOBART COMPANIES, LTD.
Not Provided for Permit to construacea
consisting of office and locatedson the
and light manufacturing,
of Peters Creek Road in the Hollins
Magisterial District.
for a Use
complex
warehousing
south side
BLJ/HCN TO APPROVE - URC
288-9
Petition of DOMINIONr1BA~K~Ho operaOtepanAofOfNce ona
Special Exception Pe
8.461 acre tract lata56731AirportrRoadZinlthe
district, located
Hollins Magisterial District.
BLJ/HCN TO APPROVE - URC
a
288-10 Petition of AKFER DoVvaOateNand reOlocateNal20. foot
KENNETH G. BOWLES
drainage easements in Section 6 of Falling Cree
Estates.
HCN/SAM TO APPROVE - URC
issuance of a WATER SYSTEM
Public Hearing on the in a principal amount
288-11
REVENUE BOND of the Coun y
not to exceed $975,000 to finas~e~ xtensions o
the County's existing water sy
RRCHWITH SAM ABSTA KING
0
U to $10
Public Hearing for citizen commen issue up -
288-12 to cover
authorization of the Treasurer o
MILLION REVENUE ANTICIPATION NOTES
operational cash deficits.
HCN/SAM TO APPROVE RESO
URC issuance of GENERAL
Public Hearing on the pOp to
xceed $398
288-13 rovements
OBLIGATION BONDS notreno ations and imp
assisCkiCreekaElementary School and Bent Mountain
to Ba
Elementary School.
HCN/BLJ TO CONTINUE TO 2/29/88 AT 8 AM - URC
N, FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES lus real
the conveyance of sure
1. Ordinance authorizing
to establish road right-of-way for Meadewood
estate
Drive and Quail Place.
BLJ/HCN $088PPRURC 1ST READING
2nd 3/ /
O, SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES
Section 21-73 of the Roanoke Counand
1, Ordinance amending and Disabled Persons,"
Code, "Exemption for Elderly
acting same, to increase the total combined income
reen rovision.
and total combined net worth p
BLJ/HCN TO APPROVE ORD.
URC
p, CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS
NONE
Q. ADJOURNMENT
.,,~ ~ TO DISCUSS 288-13 PUBLIC
MEETING CONTINUED TO 3/ff AT 8 AM
HEARING
~m~-~A-, cL-Qa-~,~,:
O~ P ANO~F
,~ _ ~ ~~ ~
(~~~~~~ ~
~ g ,'u~ 88
SFSQUICENTENN`P~
A Bcauri~ulB~gi~hing ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
ACTION AGENDA
FEBRUARY 23, 1988
Regular
Board of Supervisors meeting. at 3.00
Welcome to the Roanoke County and the fourth Tuesday -
meetings are held on the second Tuesday m on the fourth Tuesday
p,m, Public Hearings will be heard at 7:00 p-
nth. Deviations from this schedule will be announced.
of-each mo
WORK SESSION (2:00 P.M•~
Drainage
3 SB 'l TO APPROVE THE DRAINAGE MAINTENNDCTHATITHE USE OFDNONEVIOLENT
~' ~ °1 HCN/SAM
~PRIORITIZEDELUSED IN THENPROJECTJECURCA
OFFENDERS B
AFTERNOON SESSION
A.
OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.)
1, Roll Call.
2, Invocation: The Reverend Alan RowbotChurch
Unity of Roanoke Valley
3, Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag.
E UESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD, OR CAANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA
g. R Q
ITEMS.
, pROCLp,MATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS AND AWARDS M
C
NDERSON PRESENTED A FRAMED LETTNGING INNTHETADMINISTRATOON
FRED A
PRESIDENT REAGAN TO THE COUNTY FOR HA
CENTER
p, NEW BUSINESS Emer ency
~_ _l, Approval of Resolution requesting the Federal g
°~a~ ~ ency to restudy a portion of Barnhardt
~, Management Ag
Creek.
LG/SAM TO APPROVE RESO
URC
- aa3~ S- 3 2 • Elimination of ridership fees for CORTRAN Program.
HCN/SAM TO APPROVE - URC
3, Resolution authorizing shthroughnthe VirginialResources
~~ - a ~ .3 ~F _ ~ general obligation bond
Authority.
BLJ/RR TO APPROVE RESO
URC WITH SAM ABSTAINING
E, REQUEST FOR WORK SESSIONS
1, Request to reschedule wobk corps ofoEngineers,River
Tributary Streams Study Y
JH TO SET UP DATE WITH CORPS OF ENGINEER AND INFORM THE BOARD 2
BLJ REQUESTED JOINT WORK SESSION WITH SCHOOL BOARD ON 3/8/88 AT
P.M.
F, REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS
NONE
G, APPOINTMENTS
1, Building Code Board of Adjustments and Appeals.
2. Court Service Unit Advisory Council/Youth and
Family Services Advisory Board
3, Grievance Panel
RR NOMINATHATKEUGENENMAROTINEREPACESIJOELHIMES
LG NOTED
4, Health Department Board of Directors
HCN NOMINATED SUSAN ADCOCK
5, League of Older Americans
H, REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS
JOH_ NSON; REQUESTED THE STASCHOOLSTASYCOMMUNITYLCENTERDFOR USE
FEASIBILITY OF CONSIDERING
OTHER THAN SCHOOLS.
2
RAW: THERE HAVE BEEN 2 MEEMENDATIONHTOATHEAGRAYSONOCOMMISSION
MCG-_ WILL MAKE A RECOM
ANNEXATION-
IN JULY AND OCTOBER.
CONTACTED THE GEORGE MASON IN MENT~TEINVITED ANOTHERO
MEE- W THHROBERS TO STUDY ECONOMIC DEVELOP
BOARD MEMBER TO ATTEND.
T; HE AND ECH AND MET WITH THINGFUOUDIALOGRTS FROM AREA
LO- CA-IES AND HAVE ESTABLISHED MEAN
I, CONSENT AGENDA
ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDERTOHBECROUTINEAANDDWI~EBE TED
CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD
_ ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTIONDESIRED,FTHATOITEM WILLIBE D
~_ aa3 ~ ~ 7 BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS
REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDER
SEPARATELY.
LG REQUESTED THAT ITEM I-1 BURCULLED FOR DISCUSSION
LG/RR WITH ITEM 1 DELETE.U ointments to the
l , Confirmation of Committee App
_ 3 ~g _ ~ ~ Grievance Panel and Transportation ar~d Safety
/-~ ~ a
Commission.
THAT HIS APPOINTMENT TO THE GRIEVANCE PANEL REPLACE JOE
LG ASKED
RIMES, NOT RICHARD ROBERS.
BLJ/RCN TO APPROVE AS AMENDED - URC artment of
2, Notification from the Virginia Dep
Transportation that the Veen accepted intoethe50
~ - a ~ 3SS ~1. /~ (Forest Edge Drive) has b
Secondary System.
tance of Hill Drive, Airpoint
3, Request for accep artment of
~ -a?a 3Frg-~•c
., 7 o~ Drive and Airpoint Road igtsteme Va. eP
~ Transportation Secondary Y
'/ tance of water and sewer facilities serving
4, Accep in Center.
A -~ a 3 ~~-'•7•~ Hollins-Plantation Shopp g
5, Acceptance of water and sewer facilities serving
H - o~a3 8"g "~'~° Meadow Creek, Section 3.
3
Manor Drive and Old Manor Court,
6, Acceptance of Old De artment of
~` ~a~gg_ .-~,9 Plantat~~atEonaSecondarytSYstem. P
Transpo
~• Approval of a Raffle Permit for the Botetourt
Jaycees.
g , Resolution from rovallofnacquisitionlof 5 • ln7the
recommending aPP,
acre tract for fire andanningearealllties
Back Creek community p
9. Approval to close out Va. Division of Historic
rant for roof replacement on the Old
Landmark g
,~ - a ~ .3 ~' g-7• ~ County Courthouse.
J, CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS
K. REPORTS
1, Accounts Paid for January 1988.
2, Board Contingency Fund
3, General Fund Unappropriated Balance
4. Capital Unappropriated Balance
5, Statement of Treasurer's Accountability as of
January 31, 1988.
1988
6, Financial Statements as of January 1•
MOTION TO DIRECT THAT ECH AND CCMMIZENSN ARE PAYINGNUE
HCr1/SAM T ENSURE THAT ALL ECH TO BRING
ESTABLISH A PROGRAM 0
PERSONAL PROPERTY TAX ANURCURCHASING AUTO DECALS.
BACK REPORT ON 3/8/88
BLJ ASKED WHETHER THE COORTOUROOBLIGATIONETOATHEAAIRPORT
UNAPPROPRIATED BALANCE
KED FOR REPORT ON HOW MANY UNFILLED POSITIONS EXIST BY
BLJ AS
DEPARTMENT
~, Status of Starkey Road Improvement Project
ursuant to the Code of Virginia
L. EXECUTIVE SESSION p 2 (Real Estate), and 6
2.1-344 (a) 1 (Personnel),
(legal)
LG/BLJ AT 3 : 4 5 P . I"I • - URC - URC
OUT OF EXECUTIVE SESSION - 5:25 P.M. - LG/BLJ
4
E EN1.~ SESSION (7'00 P M•
I„I. PUBLIC HEARINGS to amend
-l rezone a
88 Petition of BRAMBLELandMUseCPlanSandltoE _1
2
the Roanoke County Residential to B
1.48 acre tract from R-P arking lot, located south
Business to construct a p g ring
of 3142 Bramble~oic~ve~C~NTINUED FROM JANUARY 26,
Magisterial Dis
1988.)
TO DENY AMENDMENT TO LAND USE PLAN - URC
RR/BLJ - URC
RR/BLJ TO DENY REZONING
288-2
NO ONE SPOKE
288-3
ublic Hearing on Ordinance amending Section 21-73
P Code, "EXEMPTION FOR ELDERLY
of the Roanoke County and reenacting same to
AND DISABLED PERSONS"
total combined income and total
increase the rovision.
combined net worth p
for citizen input on local
Public Hearing needs, and on
community development and housing
he roposed application foEDSO~NCITeCOnomi~pMENT
t P
BLOCK GRANT FUNDING FOR TW
development project.
HCN/SAM TO APPROVE RESO - URC
0,678 acre
Petition of GEORGE JACOB to rezone a
288-4 Business to M-1, Industrial to
tract from B-2, located at 6024
assemble musical accessories, isterial
Williamson Road in the Hollins Mag
District.
BLJ/HCN TO APPROVE WITH FIRST 3 PROFFERS ONLY - URC
Petition of JONES AND JOSSOCIATESItoEvacatelaECTS
288-5
and MEDICAL PROPERTIES A w known as Jones
portion of a 25 foot right-of- aY roximately
Street from Peters Creek Road west app
170 feet in the Catawba Magisterial District.
Sp,M/RR TO APPROVE - URC
288_6 Petition
portions
the Cave
RR/BLJ TO APPROVE - URC
of BARBARA D. CARTWRIGHT to vacate
of the cul-de-sacloDistract~sa Circle in
Spring Magisteria
288_7 Petition of
tract from
operated a
Brambleton
District.
UNG HYO CHOI_to rezone a 0.45 acre
B_1, Business to B-2 Business to
convenience store located at 45isterial
Avenue in the Windsor Hills Mag
LG/S~ TO APPROVE - URC
g_g Petition of the HOBARTtCOoPconstructDa complexse
28 warehousing
Not Provided for Permi ace,
consisting of office and retail sp
and light manufacturing, located on the south side
of Peters Creek Road in the Hollins
Magisterial District.
BLJ/HCN TO APPROVE - URC
_g Petition of DOMINION BA~K~Ho operaOtePanAofOfNceoonaa
288 tion Permi
Special Excep
8.461 acre tract diata5673lAirportrRoadzOnlthe
district, locate
Hollins Magisterial District.
BLJ/HCN TO APPROVE - URC
ano
-10 Petition of AKFER DEVVaOateNand ReOlocateNal20• fk t
288 BOWLES to
KENNETH G.
e easements in Section 6 of Falling ree
drainag
Estates.
HCN/SAM TO APPROVE - URC
public Hearing on the issuannea P a WATaR amount
288-11 rincip
REVENUE BOND of the County
not to exceed $975,000 to finance extensions of
~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~~ - S the County's existing water system.
RR/HCN TO APPRABSTAINING
URC WITH SAM
Public Hearing for citizen comment on to $10
288-12 Treasurer to issue up -
authorization of the
MILLION REVENUE ANTICIPATION NOTES to cover
~ - a a 358- ~ operational cash deficits .
HCN/SAM TO APPROVE RESO
URC
Public Hearing on the issuance of GEN 0 -to
288-13 3 985,
OBLIGATION BONDS notrenovations$and improvements
assist in financing School and Bent Mountain
to Back CreSchoolmentary
Elementary
HCN/BLJ TO CONTINUE TO 2/29/88 AT 8 AM - URC
N. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES
the conveyance of surplus real
1, Ordinance authorizing ht_of-way for Meadewood
estateand Quaablplace ad rig
Drive
BLJ/HC3/8~88PPRUVRC 1ST READING
2nd
O. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES
Section 21-73 of the Roanoke Counand
1, Ordinance am tionnfor Elderly and Disabled Persons,"
Code, "Exemp
reenacting same, to increase the total combined income
and total combined net worth provision.
~-~ a.3~~- `~'
BLJ/HCN TO APPROVE ORD.
URC
p, CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS
NONE
4. ADJOURNMENT _ -.
~/~6~ :~.:~.
ONTINUED TO ~gfR$ AT 8 AM TO DISCUSS 288-13 PUBLIC
MEETING C
HEARING
o~ POANp~,~ „
~ , ~ ~ /r
~~ ~
C~~~~t~
~$ ~~ ss
SFSQUICEN7ENN~P~'
ABwuri~ul8cgi„„ing ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
FEBRUARY 23, 1988
Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meeting. Regular
meetings are held on the second Tuesday and the fourth Tuesday at 3:00
p.m. Public Hearings will be heard at 7:00 p.m on the fourth Tuesday
of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced.
WORK SESSION (2:00 P.M.)
Drainage
AFTERNOON SESSION
A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.)
1. Roll Call.
2. Invocation: The Reverend Alan Rowbotham
Unity of Roanoke Valley Church
3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag.
B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA
ITEMS.
C. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS AND AWARDS
D. NEW BUSINESS
1. Approval of Resolution requesting the Federal Emergency
Management Agency to restudy a portion of Barnhardt
Creek.
2. Elimination of ridership fees for CORTRAN Program.
3. Resolution authorizing the issuance of $4.7 million
general obligation bonds through the Virginia Resources
Authority.
E. REQUEST FOR WORK SESSIONS
1. Request to reschedule work session on Roanoke River
Tributary Streams Study by Corps of Engineers.
F. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS
G. APPOINTMENTS
1. Building Code Board of Adjustments and Appeals.
2. Court Service Unit Advisory Council/Youth and
Family Services Advisory Board
3. Grievance Panel
4. Health Department Board of Directors
5. League of Older Americans
H. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS
I. CONSENT AGENDA
ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE
CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WILL BE
ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED
BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE
REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED
SEPARATELY.
1. Confirmation of Committee Appointments to the
Grievance Panel and Transportation and Safety
Commission.
2. Notification from the Virginia Department of
Transportation that the 0.49 miles of Route 1950
(Forest Edge Drive) has been accepted into the
Secondary System.
3. Request for acceptance of Hill Drive, Airpoint
Drive and Airpoint Road into the Va. Department of
Transportation Secondary System.
4. Acceptance of water and sewer facilities serving
Hollins-Plantation Shopping Center.
5. Acceptance of water and sewer facilities serving
Meadow Creek, Section 3.
2
6. Acceptance of Old Manor Drive and Old Manor Court,
Plantation Estates into the Va. Department of
Transportation Secondary System.
7. Approval of a Raffle Permit for the Botetourt
Jaycees.
8. Resolution from the Planning Commission
recommending approval of acquisition of 5.1779
acre tract for fire and rescue facilities in the
Back Creek community planning area.
g, Approval to close out Va. Division of Historic
Landmark grant for roof replacement on the Old
County Courthouse.
J. CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS
K. REPORTS
1. Accounts Paid for January 1988.
2. Board Contingency Fund
3. General Fund Unappropriated Balance
4. Capital Unappropriated Balance
5. Statement of Treasurer's Accountability as of
January 31, 1988.
6. Financial Statements as of January 1, 1988
7. Status of Starkey Road Improvement Project
L. EXECUTIVE SESSION pursuant to the Code of Virginia
2.1-344 (a).
EVENING SESSION (7:00 P.M.)
M. PUBLIC HEARINGS
288-1 Petition of BRAMBLETON MEDICAL ASSOCIATES to amend
the Roanoke County Land Use Plan and to rezone a
1.48 acre tract from R-l, Residential to B-1,
Business to construct a parking lot, located south
of 3142 Brambleton Avenue in the Cave Spring
Magisterial District. (CONTINUED FROM JANUARY 26,
1988.)
3
288-2 Public Hearing on Ordinance amending Section 21-73
of the Roanoke County Code, "EXEMPTION FOR ELDERLY
AND DISABLED PERSONS" and reenacting same to
increase the total combined income and total
combined net worth provision.
288-3 Public Hearing for citizen input on local
community development and housing needs, and on
the proposed application for COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
BLOCK GRANT FUNDING FOR TWEEDS, INC. economic
development project.
288-4 Petition of GEORGE JACOB to rezone a 0.678 acre
tract from B-2, Business to M-1, Industrial to
assemble musical accessories, located at 6024
Williamson Road in the Hollins Magisterial
District.
288-5 Petition of JONES AND JONES ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS
and MEDICAL PROPERTIES ASSOCIATES to vacate a
portion of a 25 foot right-of-way known as Jones
Street from Peters Creek Road west approximately
170 feet in the Catawba Magisterial District.
288-6 Petition of BARBARA D. CARTWRIGHT to vacate
portions of the cul-de-sac on Ponderosa Circle in
the Cave Spring Magisterial District.
288-7 Petition of UNG HYO CHOI to rezone a 0.45 acre
tract from B-l, Business to B-2 Business to
operate a convenience store located at 4533
Brambleton Avenue in the Windsor Hills Magisterial
District.
288-8 Petition of the HOBART COMPANIES, LTD. for a Use
Not Provided for Permit to construct a complex
consisting of office and retail space, warehousing
and light manufacturing, located on the south side
of Peters Creek Road in the Hollins
Magisterial District.
288-9 Petition of DOMINION BANKSHARES CORPORATION for a
Special Exception Permit to operate an office on a
8.461 acre tract in an M-1 Industrial zoning
district, located at 5673 Airport Road in the
Hollins Magisterial District.
288-10 Petition of AKFER DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION INC. and
KENNETH G. BOWLES to vacate and relocate a 20 foot
drainage easements in Section 6 of Falling Creek
Estates.
288-11 Public Hearing on the issuance of a WATER SYSTEM
REVENUE BOND of the County in a principal amount
4
not to exceed $975,000 to finance extensions of
the County's existing water system.
288-12 Public Hearing for citizen comment on
authorization of the Treasurer to issue up to $10
MILLION REVENUE ANTICIPATION NOTES to cover
operational cash deficits.
288-13 Public Hearing on the issuance of GENERAL
OBLIGATION BONDS not to exceed $3,985,000 to
assist in financing renovations and improvements
to Back Creek Elementary School and Bent Mountain
Elementary School.
N. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES
1. Ordinance authorizing the conveyance of surplus real
estate to establish road right-of-way for Meadewood
Drive and Quail Place.
O. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES
1. Ordinance amending Section 21-73 of the Roanoke County
Code, "Exemption for Elderly and Disabled Persons," and
reenacting same, to increase the total combined income
and total combined net worth provision.
P. CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS
Q. ADJOURNMENT
5
O~ POANp,~.~
~ ,~ A
Z
Z
a
18 E50 88
SFSQUICENTENN~P
A Beauti~ul8eginning
C~nunfy of ~nttnnke
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
ELMER C. HODGE
February 24, 1988
Rev. Alan Rowbothan
Unity of Roanoke Valley Church
3300 Green Ridge Road, NW
Roanoke, Virginia 24019
Dear Reverend Rowbothan:
LEE GARRETT. CHAIRMAN
WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
RICHARD W. ROBERS. VICE-CHAIRMAN
CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
BOB L. JOHNSON
HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
STEVEN A. MCGRAW
CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
HARRY C. NICKENS
VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
On behalf of the Board of Supervisors, I would like to
take this opportunity to let you know of our appreciation for
your attending the meeting on Tuesday, February 23, 1988 to offer
the invocation.
We feel it is most important to ask God's blessing on
these meetings so that all is done according to His will and for
the good of all citizens.
Thank you again for sharing your time with us.
Ver t your ,
i ~~~
L e Garrett, Chairman
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
bjh
P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 2 4018-07 9 8 (703) 772-2004
O~ POANO,Y~G
.. .
z
of a
1$ E50 88
SFSQUICEN7ENN~P~
A Beauti~ul8eginning
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
ELMER C. HODGE
(~nunfy ~tf +~attnnke
February 25, 1988
;vir . Rick Hall
6942 Plantation Road
Roanoke, Virginia 24019
Dear Mr. Hall
At their regular meeting on Tuesday,
Board of Supervisors ermit forla
the County tees for a P
of the Botetourt Jay
BOARD OGA RETEfRCHIAIROMAN
WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
RICHARD W. ROBERS. VICE-CHAIRMAN
CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
BOB 1. JOHNSON
HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
STEVEN A. MCGRAW
CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
HARRY C. NICKENS
VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
February 23, 1988,
approved the request
Raffle.
The fee has been paid.
our permit, and I
You may consider this letter to be Y o ermits
is layed on the premises where the Raffle is to be
suggest it bed P rovides that rafflethedpermit will
conducted. The State Code P therefore, valid
ear basis; however, is only
be issued on a calend988Y This permit,
expire December ecified on your application.
for the dates sp
a be of further assistance, please do not hesitate
If ImY
to contact me at 772-2005.
Very truly yours,
y.~ ~ -
Mary H. Allen,
Roanoke County
bjh
cc: Commissioner of the Revenue
Commonwealth Attorney
County Treasurer
Deputy Clerk
Board of Supervisors
P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 2 4018-07 9 8 (703) 772-2004
PO A Np~.~
O~
,~
~• _~
Z
Z
J a
18 Eso 88
SESQUICENTENN~P~
A Beauti(ulBeginning
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
ELMER C. HODGE
(~nixnt~ of "+,~uunnke
February 25, 1988
wir , Rick Hall
6942 Plantation Road
Roanoke, Virginia 24019
BOARD OGA RPERCVISO~ N
WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
RICHARD W• ROBERS. VIGE•CHAIRMAN
CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
BOB L. JOHNSON
HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
STEVEN A. MCGRAW
CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
HARRY C. NICKENS
VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
Dear Mr. Hall February 23, 1988,
At their regular meeting on Tuesday,
ervisors unanimously approved the request
the County Board of Sup ermit for a Raffle.
of the Botetourt Jaycees for a p
The fee has been paid.
our permit, and I
You may consider this letter to be Y o ermits
is layed on the premises where the Raffle is to be
suggest it be d P rovides that rafflethedpermit will
conducted. The State CodeaP basis; therefore, is only valid
be issued on a calend988Y This permit, however,
expire December ecified on your application.
for the dates sP
a be of further assistance, please do not hesitate
If Imy
to contact me at 772-2005.
Very truly yours,
/T
Mary H. A len,
Roanoke County
bjh
cc: Commissioner of the Revenue
Commonwealth Attorney
County Treasurer
Deputy Clerk
Board of Supervisors
P.O. BOX 29800 RpANOKE. VIRGINIA 2 4018-07 9 8 (703> 772"2004
0~ FiOANp,1.~
~.~ . p ~~~~~~~e
Z ~ ~~~~ ~~
°~ a
18 E50 8$
SFSQVICEN7ENN~P~
A Beauti/uleeginning BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
LEE GARRETT. CHAIRMAN
WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
RICHARD W. ROBERS. VICE-CHAIRMAN
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
ELMER C. HODGE p BOB L. JOHNSON
Februa r 2 5 19 8 8 HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
y ~ STEVEN A. MCGRAW
CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
HARRY C. NICKENS
VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
Mr. Joe W. Himes
3239 Clearview Drive, SW
Roanoke, Virginia 24018
Dear Mr. Himes:
The Board of Supervisors have asked me to express their
sincere appreciation for your previous service to the Grievance
Panel. Allow me to personally thank you for the time you served
on this Board. Citizens so responsive to the needs of their
community and willing to give of themselves and their time are
indeed all too scarce.
Very truly yours
Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
Enclosure
bjh
cc: Mr. Keith Cook, Director
Human Resources Department
P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24018-0798 (703) 772-2004
O~ ROANp,I.~
~.~ A
Z
Z
J a
i $ E50 $$
SFSQUICENTENN~P~'
A Beauti~ulBeginning
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
ELMER C. HODGE
February 25, 1988
Mr. Eugene M. Martin
3128 Tomaranne Drive, SW
Roanoke, Virginia 24018
Dear Mr. Martin:
LEE GARRETT. CHAIRMAN
WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
RICHARD W. ROBERS. VICE-CHAIRMAN
CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
B08 L. JOHNSON
HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
STEVEN A. MCGRAW
CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
HARRY C. NICKENS
VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
This is to advise that at their meeting held on Tuesday,
February 23, 1988, the Board of Supervisors voted unanimously to
appoint you as a member of the Grievance Panel for a two-year
term beginning February 23, 1988, and ending February 23, 1990.
State law provides that any person elected, re-elected,
appointed, or re-appointed to any body be furnished a copy of the
Freedom of Information Act; your 1987 copy is enclosed. We are
also sending you a copy of the 1987 Conflicts of Interest Act.
On behalf of the Supervisors and the citizens of Roanoke
County, please accept our sincere thanks and appreciation for
your willingness to accept this appointment.
Very truly yours,
bjh
. ~• ~~-~- ~"1
Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Keith Cook, Director
Human Resources Department
C~nixn~~ of ~nttnn~n
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 2 4018-07 9 8 (703) 772-2004
o~ POANp,Y~
~ ,F
A
Z ~
7 2
a
1$ E5~ 8$
SFSQUICEN7ENN~P~
A Beauti~ulBe~inning
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
ELMER C. HODGE
February 25, 1988
Mrs. May Johnson
3929 Hummingbird Lane, SW
Roanoke, Virginia 24018
Dear Mrs. Johnson:
LEE GARRETT. CHAIRMAN
WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
RICHARD W. ROBERS. VICE-CHAIRMAN
CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
BOB L. JOHNSON
HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
STEVEN A. MCGRAW
CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
HARRY C. NICKENS
VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
The Board of Supervisors have asked me to express on
their behalf their sincere appreciation for your previous service
to the Transportation and Safety Commission. Citizeng so ive of
responsive to the needs of their community and willin to g
themselves and their time are indeed all too scarce.
This is to advise that at their meeting held on Tuesday,
February 23, 1988, the Board of Supervisors voted unanimously to
reappoint you as a member of Transportation and Safety Comm1992on
for a four-year term. Your term will expire on January 1,
State law provides that any person elected, re-elected,
appointed to any body be furnished a copy of the Freedom of
Information Act; your 1987 copy is enclosed. We are also sending
you a copy of the 1987 Conflicts of Interest Act.
On behalf of the Supervisors and the cit~eciatoionRforoke
County, please accept our sincere thanks and app
your willingness to accept this appointment.
Very truly yours,
bjh
Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
Enclosures
cc: Captain Leonard J. Wade
4625 Roxbury Lane, SW
Roanoke, Virginia 24018
C~n~tn~~ of ~v~tnnk~
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 2 4018-07 9 8 (703) 772-2004
OF EiOANpy.~
ti ,~ A
Z
o Z
J a
1$ E50 $$
SFSQUICENTENN~P~
A Beauti~ul8eginning
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
ELMER C. HODGE
February 25, 1988
Ms. Charlotte Lichtenstein
4873 Brookwood Drive, SW
Roanoke, Virginia 24018
Dear Ms. Lichtenstein:
LEE GARRETT. CHAIRMAN
WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
RICHARD W. ROBERS. VICE•CHAIRMAN
CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
BOB L. JOHNSON
HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
STEVEN A. MCGRAW
CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
HARRY C. NICKENS
VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
The Board of Supervisors have asked me to express on
their behalf their sincere appreciation for your previous service
to the Transportation and Safety Commission. Citizens so ive of
responsive to the needs of their community and willing to g
themselves and their time are indeed all too scarce.
This is to advise that at their meeting held on Tuesday,
February 23, 1988, the Board of Supervisors voted unanimously to
reappoint you as a member of TrmnWplltexpireaon JanuaryCl,~l992on
for a four-year term. Your to
State law provides that any person elected, re-elected,
appointed to any body be furnished a copy of the Freedom of
Information Act; your 1987 copy is enclosed. We are also sending
you a copy of the 1987 Conflicts of Interest Act.
On behalf of the Supervisors and the cit~eciatoionRforoke
County, please accept our sincere thanks and app
your willingness to accept this appointment.
Very truly yours,
Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
bjh
Enclosures
cc: Captain Leonard J. Wade
4625 Roxbury Lane, SW
Roanoke, Virginia 24018
(~nunfg of ~Rnttnnke
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 2 4018-07 9 8 (703) 772-2004
O~ POANO,S-F
~.~ . p
Z
Z
of a
1$ E50
SFSQUICEN7ENN~P~'
A Beauti~ul8cginning
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
ELMER C. HODGE
C~aunt~ a£ ~nttnnke
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
Mr. Leo Trenor
543 Petty Avenue
Roanoke, Virginia
Dear Mr. Trenor:
February 25, 1988
24019
LEE GARRETT. CHAIRMAN
WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
RICHARD W. ROBERS. VICE-CHAIRMAN
CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
BOB L. JOHNSON
HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
STEVEN A. MCGRAW
CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
HARRY C. NICKENS
VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
The Board of Supervisors have asked me to express on
their behalf their sincere appreciation for your previous service
to the Transportation and Safety Commission. Citizens so
responsive to the needs of their community and willing to give of
themselves and their time are indeed all too scarce.
This is to advise that at their meeting held on Tuesday,
February 23, 1988, the Board of Supervisors voted unanimously to
reappoint you as a member of Transportation and Safety Comm1992on
for a four-year term. Your term will expire on January 1,
State law provides that any person elected, re-elected,
appointed to any body be furnished a copy of the Freedom of
Information Act; your 1987 copy is enclosed. We are also sending
you a copy of the 1987 Conflicts of Interest Act.
On behalf of the Supervisors and the cit~eciatoionRforoke
County, please accept our sincere thanks and app
your willingness to accept this appointment.
Very truly yours,
Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
bjh
Enclosures
cc: Captain Leonard J. Wade
4625 Roxbury Lane, SW
Roanoke, Virginia 24018
I.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 2 4018-07 9 8 (703) 772'2004
A-22388-1
ITEM NUMBER
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THROANOKE COUNTYEADMINISTRATIONNCENTER
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE
MEETING DATE: February 23, 1988
SUBJECT: Drainage Work Session
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
Attached is the detailed report for the drainage work
session. The staff will be making •a presentation to the Board
and will provide an overview of the report.
~` aork session will consist of:
1, Maintenance responsibility;
2, Drainage maintenance projects;
3, Major problem areas;
4. Recommendations.
Please review the report and if you need additional informa-
tion, please contact Phillip Henry so that it can 'oe made avail-
able at the work session.
APPROVED:
SUBMITTED BY:
John R. Hubbar , P•E•
Assistant County Administrator
of Public Facilities
~,.~-/
E mer C. o ge
County Administrator
--------------------------____-__---- VOTE
--- - ACTION No yes Abs
Approved (x) Motion by: Harry C. Nickens/ x
Denied ( )Steven A. McGraw to adopt maint- Garrett x
Received ( )enance philosophy, the list of Johnson x
Referred prioritized projects and the use McGraw x
to of non-violent offenders in the Roberss x
project.
cc: File Phil Henry
John Hubbard _
DRAINAGE WORK SESSION
INTRODUCTION
During the last one and a half years, the County of Roanoke
has funded and has tried to implement portions of a drainage
program. During that period of time, and even with the County
being able to respond to some very important needs, (Attachment A)
there has been a lack of specific direction established for the
drainage program. Staff believes that commitment and direction
with realistic goals and objectives need to be established for the
drainage program.
The majority of the work completed has been in what is
being defined as drainage maintenance; in other words those
projects which would address the lack of a defined drainage way,
severe erosion problems, potential safety problems, and general
stabilization of the facilities within an easement. In addition,
during the past budget year, specific improvement projects were
approved and started in the Palm Valley - Sun Valley and South
Park - Willowlawn areas.
It would now appear to be the proper time for the Board of
Supervisors with the assistance of staff to set a specific
direction for the drainage program.
A. The County has no responsibility for drainage - while
this option is available, it would appear that the
demonstrated effort by the County during the past year
and a half would eliminate this as a viable option. The
work completed by County staff, the interest expressed
by Board of Supervisors members, and the public meetings
on drainage would seem to imply that the County has an
interest and a desire to address this concern.
B. Establish a drainage maintenance philosophy - the Board
of Supervisors would accept the definition of drainage
responsibility as outlined in the Maintenance
Responsibility. This approach does respond to the
documented State statute responsibilities of the County.
It will also provide for improvements in areas where
there is severe erosion, safety problems or the need to
stabilize these drainage facilities in residential
neighborhoods.
It is staff's belief that this is a realistic approach
until the County establishes the necessary planning for
major drainage ways and provides for a permanent funding
mechanism for future improvements.
C. The County to proceed into a Comprehensive Stormwater
Management Program - Stormwater management can be
defined as planning and management of Stormwater runoff
in each watershed which is consistent with sound water
and land use practices. Generally speaking, Stormwater
management would address larger drainage areas than the
drainage maintenance program so the two could be
compatible avenues to address drainage concerns in the
County. A Comprehensive Stormwater Management Program
could offer the following advantages:
2
1, Solultion of local stormwater problems would not
create adverse downstream impacts.
2, Allow the most effective locations for the
control facilities.
3, Identifies the most appropriate control measures
and optimum locations. This strategy could include
stormwater detention, removal of obstructions to
flow, widening and protection of streams,
non-structural measures such as parkland
acquisition, and flood proofing to supplement
structural control measures.
q. A Comprehensive stormwater Management Program could
open up additional avenues of funding to the
County. Present state statutes would allow for
cost participation by developers for off-site
drainage if the locality has an approved drainage
plan. As evidenced by the present request by
Roanoke City before the State legislature, staff
would envision that future funding at the State
level or State authorization for funding
methods will be available, particularly for those
localities which have the necessary planning tools
in place.
3
MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITY
One of the major issues that has been discussed is the
concept of responsibility. This was accomplished through research
of the County regulations, State statutes, and review and
discussions between staff and the County Attorney's office. The
importance of the definition of responsibility is critical in the
application of the drainage concept by the staff on a day-to-day
basis. As discussed in the first drainage presentations, the
responsibilities were defined as follows:
A. The Virginia Department of Transportation, by policy,
is responsible for all dr 'nage within road
right-of-ways, drainage ea ements acquired by VDOT and
other drainage easements u stream and downstream of the
right-of-way necessary to revent inundation of the
pavement.
B. Roanoke County is responsible for the right of drainage
easements for all concentrated stormwaters leaving the
right-of-way of State maintained roadways to a natural
water course. As such, Roanoke County is responsible
for keeping all drainage easements clear beyond VDOT's
responsibility.
C. Private property owners are responsible for drainage in
the following areas:
1. Certain property owners are responsible for
maintaining retention/detention facilities
required by their development.
4
2. Under the "Common Enemy Doctrine," private
property owners are responsible for maintaining
natural water courses and surface drainage on
their property and can neither increase nor
decrease flows or change drainage ways to the
detriment of upstream or downstream properties.
Generally speaking, staff has used the above defined
responsibilities as the control for work during the last one and a
half years.
5
DRAINAGE MAINTENANCE PROJECTS
During the past year, the Department of Engineering has
maintained a log of drainage complaints and requests for
assistance concerning drainage. Using this information, staff has
reviewed these concerns and has prepared the attached drainage
maintenance projects list. The list only includes projects which
meet the criteria for drainage responsibility by Roanoke County.
In order to establish a priority list for potential projects,
staff developed a procedure for evaluating projects based on the
following criteria: (rating in parentheses)
1. A life threatening situation where there is a potential
threat to life resulting from a severe drainage condition.
(25)
2. Potential damage to a house or structure posing a threat
to its inhabitants or the public. (10)
3. Potential damage to property which could result in the
loss of use or value of the property. (2)
4. Minor damage, which would be considered only a nuisance.
(1)
In addition to assigning a rating or point value to a
specific situation, it is important to differentiate between an
event that might occur once every 25 years and an event that
occurs 3 or 4 times a year. To compensate for this condition,
staff assigned a factor of 2 if damage occurs frequently (during
any heavy rain) and a factor of 1 if damage occurs only
occasionally (November, '85; Labor Day, '87).
6
The priority is then established based on the potential
severity of the problem and the frequency that the problem would
occur. In all cases, however, a life threatening condition would
be the highest priority.
Staff believes that this criteria provides a mechanism to
establish a relative need to cost and is a realistic approach to
establishing a direction on how projects should be handled.
7
MAINTENANCE PROD
(PRIORITIZE
P-l. B. W. Kessler
6911 Goff Road
Loman Road
DESCRIPTION: Install 48" culvert,
Channel slopes
ESTIMATED COST: $2500 ~'
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Catawba
~~CTS
(Drainage Complaint)
~ackfill and stabilize
P-2. Penn Forest Christian Church 3028 Penn Forest Blvd.
Penn Forest
DESCRIPTION: Channel improvements culvert replacement,
slope stabilization
ESTIMATED COST: $3500
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Cave Spring
P-3. Russell E. Taylor (RFA 87E018)
2824 Emissary Drive
Montclair
Donald E. Eubank (RFA 87E018)
2828 Emissary Drive
Montclair
Bob Hodge (RFA 87E018)
2832 Embassy Drive
Montclair
DESCRIPTION: Channel Improvements, Easement acquisition
ESTIMATED COST: $40,000
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Catawba
P-4. Bob Hansel (RFA 87E026)
4514 Hammond Lane
Eton Hills
J. W. Franz (RFA 87E026>
4616 Girard Drive
Eton Hills
M
Ted Smith
4624 Girard Drive
Eton Hills
Brenda S. Castle
4538 Hammond Lane
Eton Hills
(RFA 87E026)
(RFA 87E034)
DESCRIPTION: Channel improvements, modifications to storm
sewer system
ESTIMATED COST: $25,000
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Cave Spring
P-5. Dot Eller (RFA 87E046)
3611 McDaniel Drive
Andrew Lewis Place ,.
DESCRIPTION: Drain a sink hole adjacent to Givens Avenue
ESTIMATED COST: $50,000 (Potential joint project with
VDOT and Medeco)
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Catawba
P-6. George Warner (RFA 87E043)
3934 Sandpiper Drive
Penn Forest
Henry Doenler (RFA 87E044)
3819 Hummingbird Lane
Penn Forest
DESCRIPTION: Channel improvements, ditch stabilization,
storm sewer modifications
ESTIMATED COST: $60,000
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Cave Spring
P-7. Harry Goin (Pending Suit)
8167 Hunter's Trail (RFA 88E079)
Belleview Estates
DESCRIPTION: Re-establish natural drainage channel
ESTIMATED COST: $20,000
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Hollins
P-8. N. J. Holbrook (Drainage complaint)
314 Woodmere Drive
Lindenwood
DESCRIPTION: Repair damaged drop inlet in storm drain
ESTIMATED COST: $3000
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Vinton
P-9. J. D. Thompson (RFA 87E011)
618 Landfair Drive
Lindenwood
DESCRIPTION: Clear blocked 36" pipe, stabilize channel
ESTIMATED COST: $3000
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Vinton
P-10. Richard Smoot (RFA 87E038)
1325 Vivian Avenue
Dwight Hills
DESCRIPTION: Repair storm sewer pipe
ESTIMATED COST: $2000
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Catawba
P-11. Stan Barnhill (RFA 87304)
3333 Kingswood Drive
Algoma Park
Tom Phillips (RFA 87E042)
3327 Kingswood Drive
Algoma Park
DESCRIPTION: Stabilize ditch
ESTIMATED COST: $5000
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Cave Spring
P-12. George Coughenhour (RFA 87E047)
3319 Overbill Trail
Penn Forest
DESCRIPTION: Channel improvements, storm sewer repairs
ESTIMATED COST: $37,000
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Cave Spring
P-13. Lawrence E. Horton (RFA 87E050)
3510 Penn Forest Boulevard
Penn Forest
DESCRIPTION: Ditch stabilization
ESTIMATED COST: $1500
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Cave Spring
P-14. Gene Tuttle
5551 Ambassador Drive
Montclair
DESCRIPTION: Channel improvements and ditch stabilization
ESTIMATED COST: $5000
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Catawba
P-15. Richard Looney (Drainage Complaint)
7340 Barren's Road
Barren's Road
DESCRIPTION: Drainage channel improvements (Coordinate with
with VDOT)
ESTIMATED COST: $1500
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Catawba
P-16. Norman Caldwell (Drainage Complaint)
2233 Ruritan Road
La Bellevue
DESCRIPTION: Channel improvements
ESTIMATED COST: $5000
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Hollins
P-17. David Crosswhite (Drainage Complaint)
5216 Burnt Quarter Drive
Falling Creek Estates
DESCRIPTION: Drainage channel improvements
ESTIMATED COST: $2000
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Vinton
P-18. Bridle Lane
Sugar Loaf Estates
DESCRIPTION: Channel improvements, slope stabilization.
ESTIMATED COST: $2000
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Windsor Hills
P-19. Watkins
Sugar Loaf Mountain Road
DESCRIPTION: Rip Rap culvert outlet
ESTIMATED COST: $1500
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Windsor Hills
1803 Elbert Drive
TOTAL ESTIMATED COST = $269,500
I{i~ // {' '_ 1300-
/ / ~~. .. f...
`~l ~~AS~iti.
.-' Np H
`~~ ~~Q-~
_~=~,~~a
~ ~~,~.
. ~ ~ fP`EN~ ~\
5'te ,'
_`~, ~
~~~,p~O'~rT dpj.ra - -H AUR, , ~~~~ wbv'-. "'. -.
'~+~4Y QP 1
w
'~°~~s:. ,~ ,~ APO ns m
,.~.~~ VICINITY MAP. ~"°~~~>~;~,
____a"~`""'_
!~
,., ~i
rN'
~ '~~;i l
s ~
' r
':~~i'
i~JD ~\ 1>.~~' ~
NORTH
\ ~ r
~ / ' 11
1 O ? I.OOAc
dlf \ I.OOIk(Di / 100At
4 \ 1.13AciG / r /
r~
\ / f 12 /
~~ ~ / ~ i
I.OOAc(a
5 \ / 1.15ACIC) ~ /
LOOAc ,
r / +~
t \
I.OOAe 3
4 ~ / ~' 1 ~
100Ac / ~ / +
/ I.ooa
~, s
S
` 100Ae
1 13 ~ ~
O4
~.~ ~~~~ ~' 13 I
r ~
p
I.OOAc ,
r.~al't
4/ n. .~
~ / / `~G 200At1D1 ~" ~/ I.OOAc
.S y 7
I.OOAc +i4 d ~ ,,~
9 /
K r ~ ~ ~
/ br ` / 8 ~{ 12
~ 4 4 12 ~•'
•e I ~ IAOAe / $~a /
t t ` '?
r` ~
' tit . \ - G° ~4 3~ \\ g ,$ ' / ~
2 ~ ,oc ~ ~'p 2 (I
r O \ / p `C 'd \ / tOQ4c ~~
b 3 V r.
br
5 ~~ 3 ~\ i.ooac 12 „~
r 4 / °2 6 /
~~
1.9SAdo) / \
..
O 3
~~1~
2
a
PUBLIC FACILITIES
~ ~ ~ ~ , ~:
/ 142Ac
7 'F~ ~
~C`c 2
e ~r~ / i^ ~ 5
., e / i 3
4 °•' - - / -
B. W. Kessler
6911 Goff Road
Loman Road
P-1
r
N
NORTH
v -.
_
• M
f n~On•
G1e i
l2
.2 ~
~H ]] ~
~ = 151 •9
'
'
e 1
s1s (4
Tp
'
13
~
s1, >4 I ~
•s
w x1
^
Is6
31
1 • ° e ~ O
to II
^ ~2 I
6e
V rIZA 6s°~
~ ~.
so ~
sl, s+
tote oy I10 6 ]
c 29
r
1s] s
' s
~
x1y
Q( $ g!
eo
a^ ~
35 32
I • 8
0
28
~eite~Y •9~ ~ X9
coos , >a °
•' 41 40 ~ 1,79 ~ ~ $_: ~ lsoss o s ^ 24 1• .N
11 a
~
! • a, z g
' 33 ~ e is Isl •
9 ' I I ~ p
eo a eo.n s6.,• ~~ ,66
\ ss
e r 25
g ~
I rs zs
n
! z / ~ ]q 61 ~ hl 6t
:IZ eb s
a u !2 196
i. 1z loss ,l es
19.3 0 19.2 19.1 37
" 34 26 ~ ~ ~
'~~ -
" - - - a
~~
Blue. ,
~ ,1~ 21 ; °~
~~ Penn ~ 26 :. 25 % ~~~ ,.e
~ • N ~ '
~ 106 i6 't7
`D ,~, as ,1
'~' 3•L ! } 27 b
' 28 r ,A
61 '~ ~ v 19 ° '~ a
~
~
~
' ~
t ~29~ ! ~, R
, ~
: a
:
18
? 4
sx Cs
! 6 6' 't•¢
14
Ir is ~
1s1
~ 33 r g '
t 1
•13 ~ ; /
s. 9
~ sz $
31 30 ~ "110 ~
•x :
d ss>s I5
•'~ to ~ ~ ~ ''4
/ +°
so s•
so ,x• w '
N
^ 34 s I.~As PYnsy Gress
CMislivn CAu/CA •~
9
9 ss .P
~ ~ .
12
/
S 35 IJ
Q
It ^ ' I$4 Ac ;~w ; s ' Qt~ °'
II 34 ~''6
14
o y 10
O
' ~
35
/ '
J
c
i
,' ~ j
b
~'
s o
.
e / '
i
GIG
o °
36 s ~
s
g
32 , 1,
7 ~
~
~
;
~
~ I!, !J
~ r
e
so ~
$ rn r ~~
cr....~w.r• 6 ~ / &
•
o
2
22 s
•
o .ao ~d 31 ~, '
Q
' a1 tip
21
a 37 6 ~
sl
n s 5
s+
CA
~
30
~s 38
~ s a
~ o _ .. F ~~
,s 14Je 17 ,,
~ g 38 r
O
' - ~ 28 s •1 z.
~ N 18 ~ 6~°
O •~
10 i !P ~ / ~C ~C 3J t
so
•` •
926 ~ \\CI ` •~
~
@
~
~
150
d 0 39 t • ~ 3 Q -
I 27 \P ~
42 a .e ' o A S
^
19
24 r ! y 'n 43
8
fi Bn 41 -
s, °ti
Ja gee ti
?
• '>on X21 ~ !o
s92 27 ' ~
o 2
'°wl
~ 8
eCCOn q T•
1 I,
e' ~n r
25
os
1 !J 26
e
~ i.I )z o
S.
~~'? 27 I
'iii 2~J -.
i65a ~
Penn Forest Christian Church
PUBLIC FACILITIES 3028 Penn Forest Boulevard
Penn Forest P-2
NORTH
-. - ~
Russell E. Taylor
2824 Emissary Drive
PUBLIC FACILITIES Montclair P-3
14' \4°jwe~~E
oa ~~
, l.'Ott/i~h
~~ ~c,N
•• C~ JrE~~ &c
1
lynn -' -4Y1
y g ~y ~ I~\ rA ' f
3P 419\~ _ ~ , ~ ~ I M~.j/ I J!'' :
K ~(~'~"' ~ 419' I~t^,• qg~ ~°`°~ d9Fi ,~w~i. ;~;t
~~
Fs"9roNE/4CE ~ (f4r ~ '?~ ~,, • ~ ~.rr s~+' c ~ ," ~.' ~ a ~.~.
~} ~,o < CRESTW4~Q ~ . ,`1W P~~.~..- f. ~~~,,Oy~a ~,~1
_~QQ-i'.B(Et'ltlop '. 4., ~ u~.,, ,ns!_ 4f ~(G~~~'•~e't_a!"'' ~. I
CA CwC SAwf 4 ~~RQ vp Site ,~ ~ Qt l ~~ ~P ..• ~F~ l~'/~~F d', ~ O l
~EZ. EV~~~ F~~ ~~d'_ 3S, J '~ib.4 \~_~4~~ti ~F' ~~"~$~~p~''•, •i
H~tl~ ' . c~"`F®~ Q _ _! I ETON MILL ~ womH~ 419 ~ n•b ~ .:N Js.,T~~'?t
~_P"' q ZU71 cross 4 4 .' 4 86t~tAN HG
2 ~+ b ~ `^ • saioa¢ _, -ti`°~"^ ~ ~ mom.. •~
~' - - r ~\~~~/ i`
'.O,P ,.Y 'MO C^AE``N,,MLLLLOIINfuD~.. _ WM ~ _ ~I
' ,~• PENN ~ ys!CR Q.Y`~'StwTJh `~.wD~d+ /.,C~ .,
~•Y Yr"3raE: I~.~.~E.n
- ~ ~ ~~! VICINITY MAP ~ n
PUBLIC FACILITIES
Bob Hansel
4514 Hammond Lane
Rtnn Hills
NORTH
o~ b=;E~_ ~ "~
~ -
G.'''sg ~ 8~ ~ ~~~ ~o~7y \~ ~/3TgR ~lL ~H ~_l S L
~ ~ ciawanE~ _ 3~ ~`~ "£ \ ndC~c Mµs~ ~j" E / -'•-:.•••••-.•
/: "~• 640 .q ~~ ~c,~.-":~' ""ti , ~ ~ ~ ~b.~
__~~ J Q 1 ~~,\~ ~ -~. •~ ^w~ - ~t[ ,~~ fir? ~ ~ `~ Sr+V+.L~~ e'-_--.-...,_~.~1~
"'' 642 ~'~/,~ ~Iy~ ~ '~ ~ j. / _
v, ~ , µortw, . ~/'~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 639
~~ ze _.,/ ~;~ ~.,, ~ . VICINITY MAP xREEN H~~~ ~,~ ~
NORTH
I-~
\ \
\ /
PUBLIC FACILITIES
Dot Eller
3611 McDaniel Drive
Andrew Lewis Place
P-5
George Warner
PUBLIC FACILITIES3934 Sandpiper Drive
Penn Forest
NORTH
P-6
~~ 1; ~ - ~ tI1KE ~ ~ ~ z w
` wu¢n~ay, ! 605 1 ~ ~ ® ~"•-. J
zzo g~~ ~,'~ ~k« .«~
.o >;~ ~~ '~ ,~ 601 ~, y~ Y
A ,_aR/ ~~~iro op o~ e~ i5it ~C ~~__ r
iEW` \ •~
~~~~1~ ereooK;n~,.AO:~~ ow ~ ~ ge" ~ A/.. ~ ~'~pp \ 11~~._~ ~.
~~~~~ _
r
nr~ ~~_ ~ ~'W~°`" x,'•90 ,_ JCS'', 7 ' - ~ ? , ~' ~,
AEROfAN 1. i ~M~'_•'- -_~__. ~ ~XX• ~
~u`'' ' ~" ' 3~. ~'"~DE"00D~ VICINITY MAP • `"
NORTH
Harry Go in
PUBLIC FACILITIES $167 Hunter's Trail
Belleview Estates P-7
g-cnl ~`,~~•w. N'"1 - -Blu ~{~ ~o l~t~~~ ~ t (~y~~{~~ P~.~c5V1~.1E .~~,' Q $~c4"~~,q ~ ~n
F~~ ~ ~ ~~'~ ~[ANETTE/F_~~,WASi_t ~ .~F.N~ 1 e~~7 `f'~'~'..~ 'iTPMkNM ~~ ~V3•
' '~-f a ~ "•,i• I N,a'S ~`_ ~ ~ UNDENW000~ oP ( xc:
~'^v-,ev~.. ~`q~p.., ~;: 24 6ss' fNP. \ ',,'; '~~~ ~5~±--,.. tk{L Fig 1 ,t
AV C !~ [K _..- 1 OQJ~/. )..~, \ Mph[. CF. tlyHw, l`i
~p,~ ~ 2E,~'PO °+' a° JSH ..~ ~~. •t _ l a ./ ~ Is.ots 1 ~; • ~ , ~
24 zi ~ ed ~ ~LNa~p ~t~' 0, ~ ( S~I` ovc~.'a ¢ ,
S `;tl-~BERut;E ; ~ ; . `634 o~ua..ecasy ~', ~, . ~ `~ ~ ~~a~ ~7~Yy p~v~A ae , F
~~~ .~~ 764^ .91. ~ .,., ~ ~ :.. r9 Tg,
w.r.re. °t~;, "0~1~e~a_a_. •~_ ~.i,''i 659 a~,+~awo •~.
caf.nau°a lv Y~ ~ 7 ~ ` ~ , d i~'~ROfTO~I, .~`._~ ~- l
are taeouat_fc w If i' - duw'.tk Y ~, N f ~ '
VICINITY MAP
- __
-~ __
6
_ . ~ ~ rz
~
II 12 q 5 ~-- Palisades- ~ ~ -Dr `
roes.
,a ti
'9
o~
.N ~ za ee
~ 6
~o
18 ~ r 25 ' 9 a 7• ;; ~ o i ~~
10
'
/ I E 10 9 -
B ~
. 7
•
6
\ ,
/ ~ I i JSAc
\ 6 ~.
Jim /
~
( ~ I V
O
~ 20
\ \ ,,~ / o< ~ ~
\
C
8 s 2
''
~
oy ~ \ ~ ~ _
r x
~ II d
a 12 ~ 13
"i -
- 14
~
N . ~ I
o /
6 r
e
S•
' I
I
, 1G !
,O
r
• \ - 10
\ 26]2
1 '~ ~ .a' '
'~- Devonshire
'` ~1 ~ 15
O •
' Ts ~~ ~
o 4
r ~
~ rt se ~ ~ ~ ~~ znsa
~ roc
17
o, 3 22 II
`
? o•
9
. ~
12
13 I
14 16 ~
16 z ro
` J = _
3
w A
\ 2
~ W 7
O I
~O ,c e. I 19 a 18
~
6
L
_
-
15
18 ~ ~ ~ -
.
~, 21 4 \ I - 1.07 Ac.
1 16 ;I IS
o . 7 Y
J
• I ~ ai
i .z
L I I z]e]
13
• \
` ~
9t !y 21
O ~ -
6 paladlef
9p am
ip0 27 I
s$ 'g ~ J 4 ~
~o~ •~ ' f I
24 99 )
2 12 7 - `' ~ ~ ~ ~I 21 ~I, 22 . ~ 23 ~~
~ I a 22 r
,~~
24 ~ ~
\ I 26~
. ~e
8
I I
: e~ ~ ~ I I
~
. 28
26 ' .
I, r
27
~ ~ 28 I, `~ ~ ~ 25
~~
, / 23
°' ~
B ,
,c ~ . 10 ~ ~ rt
•
9 m
I ~ li ~
i
Jy '
.p
i ~ '~
24
;
_ , a• - ~ ~~ ~,•
a
~
., .~~ zip ~ y _ ~
~~
~anQlond ~
1
9e ~za ` 27
26 ~ 25 /
~ ,4'/ 27
;
L8
~~ e
34 I
31 ~
~ ~ .' w
- 34.1
'° I ,. s.. o 0o j
•a
'•, , vz .,
N. J. Holbrook
314 Woodmere Drive
PUBLIC FACILITIES Lindenwood p_g
y,~.,, ~,,. - I ` ~ ice' L
~ r5 ~ oR .
.~`J 6 '~~ ,~ ~" tt~_3~r'~OA ~\h'. ~v`~, x "w` ~ CMES
~ ~J D`ES' TN'.
~ u oGE ~ h STE~N~ ;,•,.c ~ t , : NOUNT!{
AV. rv~~ 1h: .'F'( i
`~°" ~ Qµt ~ ~ ~ UNDENW00 ' o~~ /,
~,a ~r 24 fIJW" h ~ °~ ~
655 f~.~ ~ g ~ ~y ~ ~ /
- DlA~~~ ~ 0 ~ ~`' ~~1(` Site P< ~ ~.~ ~.,.,,, ` ~~°~G --- -
WLLOM - Y - _ _ (~il' ~ CJ(A'(KY
i -
.. (.a,r~ 634 ~ _.. ' ~ ,.'•JI ~A..I I ~ ~~ ~ A / I
~_.~ M,.a ~„~.4.; :''~~ VICINITY MAP ANC/./,~;' _ " ,
-~
.s_
_ _~
_. '
~ .~ g .' ..~ _ _ t8 ',
', 5 ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 21 22 r~ 23~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .,
'~ ~ ~ ~ _.
'~ ~a4 ~ 24
~ V ~ r `~-~ -~` - _ _ : i2 1 -
.la =i 13 ~ i2 •0f II J ~ 15 i 20 i`h ti I- _ ~ a `1 26 r~~? `~.7
h ~, o~ - ~, -9 _ z X 5' -
~. ~j z,> i ~ .,.
I 18 0 ~;
t \~ / ~ 13 ~ 14 ' IS 17 16
• ~ I
~ ~ -
y ~~ i2 - JG ° ~ „ .•
' ~ z, \ II \ I 16 ~ ra \ 15y 14 13 •I'
.66- ~ ~ /
1 _ 1i
\ J ~ O 17 /_c~
,o ~~ 3 _' . ~ ~I ,2 ~
]~
3 ~ •~r :r~„ 23 - '
~ s Paz i 95 AC ~ `\ / ~ ` ~~~ 7ep ' ae~.
` ~ ` ] ]
~ ~ \ CompDe
j ,.~ Mtmor,0, 1 ~ ~~ 9 8
eh 6' 'aA'rsoyrer,orrr \, IO
.i 22 ~ Cnurcn C~ ~
i / 4c °
i ~~ ~'\ 21 ~, 9e 19 § \ ~
~~ ° \, ~
~ ~ \ ~ 20 \$ °' 4
27 ~\ Oc.
~'o0 2 34 Ac fD1 ~~ ~~\ ~°6 ~ ~
a' ~ 92 Ac (Q `~
'\ \ ^ ~ b
.--
\ / ~g '23 ~y.. \ ~ 8
_ -
\ i\ ~ 'i
~ ~ ~ 24 ~~- ~ ~~ ~ ee°r A 6
i 25 / My . \ h I
26
` \ o
s9r]
~ ~ s•.e
4 39 Ac
Cnwcn o/ Cnnsr \ A
37
19
;.
• 36 •~- Q 20
\ '.
6D
~\
-_ ~.
PUBLIC FACILITIES
NORTH
P-9
J. D. Thompson
618 Landfair Drive
Lindenwood
NORTH
_ - --=-.
----- - ~ \3 ems. .26 •t
~~
.:
O p \ ,. \?7 . ~ eat
,~
\ M
7 ~. \ ~ \24 i~ ee ,e \'' s
RCd co r \ •\ c. 4 t s \28 ~.ee \ r
\ \ P~ \ ,e \ ~ ~~
+ 'o
t \ so \ to \23 s .Re ,t ~' \ e• ~~. .S4 ~ ~°r
~\ 6 \ ~ w \ \
' \ \ tP \ .p 30 a o° \ •~ \ „
e zan 0 33 • \ \ s n \~
e \ t tt`aa .r ,~~ ~\~ \ ~\ ~, \\,
6
\ " \.
- t \t~ ~ ~ `ti tJ ~ ~~\ P ~ \ \ :~r~ ~\ ~
\ ` \ •~ Dhr o° \ \ s \ ~ \ \ \
\IO \ \ t' : :s.vo \ \ t~ \ s\ .? \ \ e~
\ t, ~ ;,\ ~ \ \ ~ \d
• . ~ 18 \ , \37 o b, ~ • \ \
• ~' a
p ~ • \ 17 \ 6 ~ \38 ` ~ ~ t \ f~ S / \ j
\ \ \ N \ ~0 \ C \ \
\ + ~ J \ \
~ \ o + ~ \ •\
i.
\ X40 \ \ p \ \ ~ / \
\15 \ p \ \ ~ „ \\ \ \ ~\
\p „
I ,o \ ~ g ~ 43 • is • ,t \ \ \ ~ ~[ \ I•
e~ ~ ~ K \ \ \
I :•" .`` \ %b \ ~ „ \ 62.1 \ \ ~ \
42\ ~~\t \\ 8AC ~
' ~ \ \
I 'Oaf tl,~w ~z'D \ \ \ \
St ri \ \ \ 3~cg
\ \ \ p ~~~
I P/O 26.16-2-K \ \ \
i+' ~~
'~
^ sm,o~o ~~ ~~ ~~
\ (.
\\,',i
2
PUBLIC FACILITIES
Richard Smoot
1325 Vivian Avenue
Dwight Hills
P-10
NORTH
s
-
"~!d b • 29 €
- a .) !
r ` i 23
~ P!° ) es. 6
35
$ 32
~ o
.
28 -
~ a
tte~Y .9 z!' )cq
Je ,oo) , s! e rye z e3 4.
a
8 I n
3 ~;al_ V'
33 3T).999 P 24 9 9
c q '•9`e',
~ „
l Tsb
ro a
~ » - X99
"-~.. ~ 25
a p ~_ r
r9 7e F ~ .
.
l
T"
tl~ 9
29 LT
~j~ ,Ii 96 ,'J!! ., 9• /
34 _ 26 ~
K5 bE _~'
~~ /
29 2! `
`
~
~ BIVd.
~~ ~ i)T 79 ~
y
~ 21 a :,~~ ~~ )) /
~ ~ E~.9
Y
.forest r- ~
I I «' 23 ~ 22 .. ` 1 9
2a - P ~ 10 ~ s..9 z.
/
~l
~ ~~
!. -' 20
2s T
~ 9 ~~
e
~
~
•
~'~ 28 ° 27 cl, I
~ ~ ° ~~`! Ig -
/~ ,gyn. =~
Ts.,
I f
'
~ r 29 NI «I
11 S - R
>•
/
• [
j
8
'
/ ~ o
it
r 13 v 6 12
.
31
~
Huey Grove
10 s '.°
°•
'~
~°, °• .p`f •`~ ,: ~ ~ 4:
~ !,
~ s7
/
3
LOSAe 12
CAns7ron CM7reA 9 `e o \
° /
~ / 35
c f
,.
I 194 AC '9
~ ~
P
II
5 1 .' f
a
e
~t~ ° 34
14 • 6
/ .
I s
X0
'r °` ~c
~'` 8 `~ c7 s
s
~ r- e B 36 o` e ~ LISAc
~
• y
33 ,,
O
~ J ~ /
1 c
R
7 ° a
•~ 15 a ._
O
1
6
• .~ T v c9 __ T~ p ~
Y 6 ~ .s
~ ~r
~
" e °° ~d
'b
31 'o s ti 56
16
~
" ~ .° ,6~tA 30 ~
~
`
M1• N
~~ O 19 ~.
b1 \• f
23 ~/ 4
.~ J Tf
• ..I r
P fl I
~` 27 `,° 42 etc 4 ~~ 8
°x 5 ~ : 51 •.25
3
R ~
P
~ e 43 - ~~_ ,.4 19
1 a
7 ~.
X52
n' .
...
0 f o`. ~ n _
f ~ P
~s use
21 C> ' °
~ ti
~ ,.e, ,
Lpn~nde
r 2
Beocon ~l
~ e,
~ U
_ •'
02 _
20
31 ~;
s Q a I
~ ~ 26 ! s! 19 ,.
°! 25 ~ )s9> ~~ ,
',, « _ 505.
-
e.. e 24
f "!
f I 9c ,,, ~
etas •n`' _
,
4 0 ? ' ~
~-Pf
33 nI
~/
//
PUBLIC FACILITIES
Tom Phillips
3327 Kingswood Drive
Algoma Park
P-11
NORTH
_ V
Fo~eS' I 11
\ \ q .ec
Bib, L23Ac 5 \
i 3 03 Ac (DI
\ - 3 40AC tCl
j 4.1 e, \
\ ,t
l
n 92 a..e /
5 .~ Si ~ ~ \
~ ~. 687 ~- 26 ,T 69 ..
qT~• ~~`
200AC - ~~11! 9.e i2'M
J
1~~~
i a~ 1 ~~ p`
g B
$ i 'S.
~1 , ~i
~ ~ j ~ ti l
6 i a"7j~ /~ ~~" ^pij
312AC 7 ~ q 9~ 3 ~/~-
6 Iry 5 ~ %~~iII
125AC
t ~I
R
. ~ ~O _ ~? -
i i ~ ,~ 2'
' one ~
~i
~~0 ~6
J
~~0 ~9 9 .
e1 9 ~
~ 12
994 AC O ~~a
3 II ~
• , . s.
~ ~~~_ 1O
\ 1\ 9 `I ~ ~I 13 ,~ /
8 ~ ,~/
1 I
F\ , t
~~ ~~ \ / .~ M 526 1~C
T~~`\ ' Je
~A ` /
6
.`, 7 0(1~
v8(
Lawrence E. Horton
PUBLIC FACILITIES 3510 Penn Forest Boulevard p-13
Penn Forest
r. ~
~~
~ k sKF wR~~on r ~ ^, ~„' ~,r ~,; • 4a,,,f ~o~4E ~ ~ • ~! ~ ~ , ~~,//1g Q~ ~•
-~;, '~laJ'.' ,jy 19 '~i ~ t-1°wwt`:::r l~~ _ ~• C~ $ 3, ~~, ~ i. ~ •:-_Di
{ ~~qS~ // ~ i Ql~ d,1~ ':ypp0Ey11Y~[ ~ _ ~ ` ly 47~'~ ~
. i , i~ . ?c% ~F V'~ •~'~ w~^ic'nlo ~ ~ ~;t~k,7';b Oa ~ `: ~~p~ " ^ ~ p ~?10, ~~~' -~ .J7•#/( 116 61?
,~
` ~,/~'.~°~,.~i-,':7VICINITY MAP ~i:.~i ~~s?K~~,+`~,~`,t"r~~l
NORTH
Gene Tuttle
PUBLIC FACILITIES 5551 Ambassador Drive p-14
Montclair
- _ ~_ ..
NORTH
b `e
II ee
orr°
•
~ ~.
12
' \
ti
it /
Roanoke Coverly
rJg~ BeorA o/ Super rrt ors
O Q ~,
2S
b ~ e
` 1
roe
r t
o
/
ti 12 \ 2.52 Ac
, b
13 ' •
/ 13
8
~ ? ;
la te,, ~
5 a.ex Ae
ao P ~~'t r ./4
i
/
t
~ I I rte 'rh ta. t 15 ~ ~
_~ •1! I• It
O`
•
ti a
8 ° `
° ,
''o r J ' , • ° to
P ~ ~ 17 f
~ ~r ? `
' ~
~
!•:'
r / r
_ ° 23
''
y °
° er
` ~
_.
„ . • p,
`.
r
r
s o .,e
I
t'4 No/thmont 1~ , • , \t ez a
t °
r
8
\ \ ~, ro
~ ~
\
18 1g \ \ O
24
26 ~ \
t(`G~
~\5
r °
° /
~
N
-
\ ~7 't \ \
°
`
s O t ~
~ °.z !. e.
~.° Leo e.
so.n •o a ~~ \ \ \
s. sr ,t NorIA `goo~oRe
it
~ \
\
,.
, Bop/it/ ` CAurcA
w -
~ /
29 ~, 28 0 \\ \\ \ Np\~\ns /
31 30 .
32 X
.. 'o b \ / /
o ~ A
\ i
i
33
'
b \
\ I
.
~
.~ ~
food ~
\ \ \
'
~
ek/ ~~
Z\
~ \\ \\ \
Q
az (e
~
\8(S ~
15 ~i ~ ~J 24 \ \ \ 179 A
~ e
A'
iP ~' ~ ~2 `. ` ;, ~ ~ ' ' 25.x° '26.1 J,
~O ~ . ~ _ tia ~ ~ 28.1 ~ ~ 4
~o0
\ ~
\ \ 48 C.
\
\
~ 9
5
7 ~ .~ 4 u e r t eo rtr ti 4
\ LSD Ac
\
\ t rt
'a , ~
r ~ r. 31
\
\
~~
\ ~o° rr 33 ~ .- .
41 \
\
.
r~ \
1.65 A[ lDl
\ \
\ ~
~
~ L
. O ~ , t~ \
\it\
'P i~
\ N 2.39 Ac. fC 1
\ \ ,
\ \
\ ~
J ~~
\ 3¢ \ "\ ~ \ - ~
\ X32 \~
.
\
•°Y y\ \ \
\
\ \ \
\
~ `1
~
..
Richard Looney
PUBLIC FACILITIES 7340 Barrens Road
Barrnes Road P-15
,,~ ~ ,-
5 ~ ~ .,~ ~
` ._ _ ~f \\ r ~\\
;. -
„v~i' - ~ ~ BED Vl1E ~~ , a6 \
~kAO M7Af,:~ p° .. s~'2~~ ~~~`,. so '~e ,(y\
~~w ~ _ ~ ~ VICINITY MAPC ,~i~'" ~. ~°~
NORTH
~\
~ ~ \
?~
~ ~ ~ 8 4`
o °
~pQ I r~
O~n 4
7 / I
6 J
`b`O ' ? i A
~4
is os e• ~s s. _ ~ ~ 8 ` 3 d,~ 5.66 AC (D;
° ~ 646Ac.(C)
r s ~~ 5 /
I •
3 4 eoD 7 \ to „-,
,>
~ ~ 9 5
,~ ~~ s
_ ~ 'ee ` ~ a
ti,
•..
2 \ I
I I
O 3 4 s 5 .~-
r 6 • yi
t
't'r r ~ ~M ~s \
a ''es ~
s " ~ 12 \
z ooa
33 ` i'
(~ ~ 34.1
L02 Ac \
i
13
`^ 2ooa
32 _ \
VOAc
~ ~
~ / 14
\ \ ~ // 34 _ O 24I Ac !
~ / I.04 A[
r ~ ~ / 35 ,
~ 467 I IS
5.32 ac Ic)
• ICSAc
29 ~
r~ ~
Norman Caldwell
PUBLIC FACILITIES 2233 Ruritan Road p-16
La Bellevue
t ., ,, _ ~ F
I ~ ~ TM'W Mi
tj ~ _ . --.
•• ' •~ ` ~ o0o14R GRpi
~~-~+... BI=HOrICto
f ..
I ~ t,i l
}
p`. ,, .
, f4 ~
~ , •~!c 4
f
`y~~_lp
;~~-__ ._
i ~ ~ ~.
/ \ ~
-~/ ~
~ l.~ ~;
h' ~
~. ~~
1. ~- 1 ~J
ue /
~ ~ , ~ 651 (~,
~~ ,~, /
I VICINITY MAP '~.~`
Horsepen Mountain Circle
PUBLIC FACILITIES Burnt Quarter Drive
Falling Creek Estate
NORTH
P-17
NORTH
a ww cw
e3 .c e „ ~ 16 Y '3
a
~.,~ 'Oar _ 17 !!
x sf ez re ,_ 18
28 '0
ao x .e 2• 22 O
,~
twr r ~wwra ~ 20
a., a ~ 24 21
~ o ~ r i804c
0 2 OOAC \
s. ~
6
~f)x9 ,
).,,) 37L ~9)te ) 3 /
~ ~ j 25 x'03 r : r 2)3 °j `t'
~ x9 I _ 4 ti ~ ~~
iso rz o S r~ ~.
e °) oe3 „ Q'
g° 'e !9 )z
~ 8 ,•~ ` ~s e w 8
1 • 6
r' < ~~ Po ,o) z•
ce 69.i °j
s` ,8 ~O 1
i~ ~'- ro2S
~,a
,~ r/ 26
a~ .~
o° :„
'~ 27
O
v
ri'~h
° e ~
/
_ II ~
~
t
V ,>e
ttio
y °°
9q9
rr~ ,p 1
~
° 10
~ "o° IS
e~•s .). a xer /
cyst ° - ~ 9 " ~ 9
.
' ems xis
J
~
24 _ ~ ' 'eee ~m ,°
~
23 r
y
_ _ -Q, s _
0 ,
~ P2 ~ 21 20e 19 IB;, 17 ~I 16 b'
- J
23.e2
~_
'
'h
Si9q
'
~) 3)•T
I
es .cy us• re
Elbert Or.
eo
e0 r0
f 6
~
1 f7 e0 [2 97 1
~ i9
f 07
!,
J 5• ~ ~
~ 52 53
~ 29 °
3 N 31 ~ 32 ~ ~_ 51
~ 30 z ' » z+
~~ ° 9ie. N e] n e0 90 ~)2 ~'S
•
°ev
s
00 A
Aae)
,° 33
ff 2 ~
49
4 a
I
-?~ 5 -
~
~/
')e,~ ~
, ~ _ I
F ~) x~
,9 ~~ S~1 ~_ F ~ '
FS -
PUBLIC FACILITIES 5203 Bridle Lane
Sugar Loaf Estate Y-18
~~ 6g6
>> ~
23 1
HIQ(0(~Y'.Pp ~ "FQID j`t Av~'~$~Tpq•1~~ S7.. _~ ! _•~4 \.
Y F ~ w~E 3 ~ ~ . a ~ . ~~ . ~:~ `~iR. .
I 1. ~ ~~,.~` •...
aK ~... ~ ~
N ~
'~"~ N LL '~ 3 l~„ bG•e4r~'~ .~~.. ~~ , ~~~ ~~~ "eJ- •V--- e- yr fp 4j
~ ?tAl1`'~ ,~ ~~ A'
ste $`°~~ ` ' veo- ow ;gig ~,~ ~T~~ ,`Y
pC~ AL 6N00Nr~. 4q • ~ ~tR`U , ~i
I ..~ ~ SUGA~fCOgg:E'Sl', •'~ ~ ,~p`5=°"(' k .. ov~~~ i
``; sucARlbdF`;_~VICINITY MA ~'• ~ ~ ~•• ,
NORTH
• )3
c_
~ ~
,w
e JL e
~ 31 -
~ a
- 29
_
~ 28 R 27 26
X6.6 ~. )3
`
Be )e 25
~, 63
es
`` 8rldte ~ ~
°e 39 r3
I
r ' ~ 3o es son
• R
o`
O
2
3
_
6
9
9
Lane -- sc
-
~_ ~_
-
~~ ~~ ~~
r
J i06_ r ~ 4
- 5 e, "39 90
7
24 !
~ ,s.) .
8
9 10
^
II 43
1'
O ; !r 90 •S 5
-
9S
950}
re
906. e~6
r) r93 6
e3 )
6
,0765 6 _
'0663 a7 •
rJ
n
•
~r I rI
r!
.3 930
1
rf
9301 A
90 q3
p
~
r~
21
- 20
19 ~; 18
` 5
I7 I6
V 9 X i ia06i
))e
zr rz n n 12 ~oz I _
~
.
_ x 4
~e% I _
s
~
I
-
93
9i9 a30) ap,~
es /
~ ,oae 90
~~
- es
---
Elbert -
~' ~'- -
~ ~~ e
Or.
- ]0 e6 )~ / 45 ~e>
)0 95
r-
95
X00
6~
~
3696
)a 6z z5~
90
9p
_~' ~
a3 )9
41
6S
•
S9 9• i
~ 'g r.
I
~
32
33
34 _
m _
35 _
36
37 38 '
39
a
40
3
~31 / _~ ~ ~
I ~ ~
~ _
e .
-
~ ~
~ 4 ie~
e T66 ~ ro ~
a.
I
^+
{J 95 3
93 ~
o0 3
,~ ~
6 re
6t
~ z 'y 3i 60
IO
-~ 2! 01 / r~
/ j. 7
~
3
O B3j
1 17 ,
e
8
J 28
29 I
~ 27
18
/~~ 19 1.93 Ac
r0 e 0 6, O r`'J o
~. ~ 7 < 2 . 25 Ac
ts,9 tie ~~ ~
\ of f6
~ e
3.A o
titi 3 5? °e
~_ ~/~O ' 24 p~! 20 ~' zs9 ~z
... N 33a 000 ~ \ ,~ a,
~ '1 /
., rJ I S
~i e V `~ ~^~ >4 1 54 AC
?.
22~yo`` ~
• tin Q~
0 ~
• ` ~ X00 ~.
\~` ti
.~rd~
Watkins
PUBLIC FACILITIES 1$03 Elbert P-19
~ Sugar Loaf Mtn Rd.
MAJOR PROJECTS
'Phe attached list of major problem areas is an attempt by
staff to acquaint the Board_of Supervisors with what we believe to
be the magnitude of the problems in Roanoke County. In some cases
these problem areas and the associated cost estimates are based on
previous study, either completed by the Corps of Engineers or
the Virginia Department of Transportation. In the remaining
instances, the cost estimates are based on preliminary
investigation by staff. While some of these problem areas can be
addressed with individual improvement projects, the vast majority
should only be completed after evaluation of the total drainage
basin to ensure that the project and funding will provide the
greatest benefit within that drainage basin.
Included as a Major Project is the concept of debris removal
in and along streams. The drainage crew has previously completed
debris removal in Mudlick Creek at Cresthill Drive and South Park
Circle and Carvins Creek in the Palm Valley - Sun Valley area.
These projects were approved by the Board of Supervisors. Staff
continues to receive requests for debris removal in streams and
would request that a policy be developed for Board of Supervisors'
approval if this is an area the County drainage crew should be
addressing.
13
MAJOR PROJECTS
1. Description: Girard Drive
Nature of Problem: Undersized facilities contribute to
flooding problems
Estimated Cost: $200,000
Magisterial District: Cave Spring
2. Description: Spring Lawn
Nature of Problem: Undersized facilities contribute to
property damage
Estimated Cost: $200,000
Magisterial District: Cave Spring
3. Description: Green Valley
Nature of Problem: Poor overall drainage contributes
property damage
Estimated Cost: $200,000
Magisterial District: Cave Spring
4. Description: Chapparral Drive
Nature of Problem: Undersized facilities result in flooding
Estimated Cost: $400,000
Magisterial District: Cave Spring
5. Description: Meadowlark
Nature of Problem: Undersized facilities result in flooding
Estimated Cost: $200,000
Magisterial District: Cave Spring
14
6. Description: Merriman/Starkey
Nature of Problem: Flooding of small creek results in
property damage
Estimated Cost: $150,000
Magisterial District: Cave Spring
7. Description: Pinkard Court
Nature of Problem: Lack of facilities results in property
and highway flooding
Estimated Cost: $350,000
Magisterial District: Cave Spring
8. Description: Route 636, creek adjacent to road
Glade Creek Road
Nature of Problem: Due to restricted nature of the stream,
moderate to heavy storms cause property
damage
Estimated Cost: $250,000
Magisterial District: Hollins
9. Description: East Ruritan Road
Just below La Bellevue
Nature of Problem: Natural channel overflows to cause
property damage
Estimated Cost: $200,000
Magisterial District: Hollins
10. Description: Old Hollins Road, Swale
Nature of Problem: A small swale drains the entire Old
Hollins Road area and causes property
damage
Estimated Cost: $400,000
Magisterial District: Hollins
15
11. Description: Old Hollins Road, Sinkhole
Nature of Problem: AMPS, INC., uses a natural sinkhole as
part of its stormwater management.
However, the sinkhole tends to flood
adjacent parcels.
Estimated Cost: $30,000
Magisterial District: Hollins
12. Description: Tinker Creek
Summerdean
Nature of Problem: Flooding of residences within the 100
year flood plain
Estimated Cost: $750,000
Magisterial District: Hollins
13. Description: Carvins Creek, Hollins College/Summerdean
Nature of Problem: Flooding of Commercial, Institutional,
and Residential Property within the 100
year flood plain
Estimated Cost: $1,000,000
Magisterial District: Hollins
14. Description: Carvins Creek, Sun Valley/Palm Valley
Nature of Problem: Flooding of residential property within
100 year flood plain
Estimated Cost: $850,000
Magisterial District: Hollins
15. Description: Nelms Lane Sinkhole
Nature of Problem: Sinkhole causes flooding of adjacent
residential property
Estimated Cost: $125,000
Magisterial District: Hollins
16
21. Description: Winter Park Drive in North Lake
Nature of Problem: Undersized facilities result in property
damage
Estimated Cost: $100,000
Magisterial District: Hollins
22. Description: Cove Road, Glen Cove Elementary School
Nature of Problem: The drainage from the elementary school
causes erosion and flooding along
Cove Road
Estimated Cost: $100,000
Magisterial District: Catawba
23. Description: Montclair Estates
Nature of Problem: The overall drainage system is undersized
and results in property flooding
Estimated Cost: $300,000
Magisterial District: Catawba
24. Description: Mason Creek
Nature of Problem: Flooding of Mason Creek causes commercial
and residential flooding
Estimated Cost: $1,000,000
Magisterial District: Catawba
25. Description: Andrew Lewis Place
Nature of Problem: Several natural sink holes contribute to
property flooding
Estimated Cost: $250,000
Magisterial District: Catawba
18
16. Description: Sierra/Fenwick Sinkhole
Nature of Problem: County owned sinkhole causes flooding
on adjacent residential property
Estimated Cost: $65,000
Magisterial District: Hollins
17. Description: Captain's Grove Subdivision
Nature of Problem: Very poor overall drainage results in
numerous complaints of property flooding
Estimated Cost: $250,000
Magisterial District: Hollins
18. Description: Deer Branch
Nature of Problem: Deer Branch contributes to flooding of
several residences along the stream
Estimated Cost: $300,000
Magisterial District: Hollins
19. Description: Dwight Hills
Nature of Problem: Poor overall drainage results in
residential and commercial flooding
Estimated Cost: $150,000
Magisterial District: Hollins
20. Description: Starmount
Nature of Problem: Poor overall drainage results in flooding
along Barrens Road
Estimated Cost: $300,000
Magisterial District: Hollins
17
26. Description: Wabun/Roanoke River
Nature of Problem: Flooding of Roanoke River causes property
damage to adjacent residences
Estimated Cost: $200,000
Magisterial District: Catawba
27. Description: Route 777 Vicinity
Nature of Problem: Flooding of small stream causes property
damage to adjacent residences.
Estimated Cost: $300,000
Magisterial District: Catawba
28. Description: Sugar Loaf Estates
Nature of Problem: Flooding and erosion of channels cause
property damage
Estimated Cost: $800,000
Magisterial District: Windsor Hills
29. Description: Cresthill Drive
from McVitty to Mudlick Creek
Nature of Problem: Erosion of channel causes property damage
Estimated Cost: $200,000
Magisterial District: Windsor Hills
30. Description: Castle Rock Road
Nature of Problem: Systematic "filling in" of natural
watercourse created man made sink holes
Estimated Cost: $225,000
Magisterial District: Windsor Hills
19
31. Description: Cave Spring Lane
Nature of Problem: Flooding and erosion causes property
damage
Estimated Cost: $200,000
Magisterial District: Windsor Hills
32. Description: Windsor West
Nature of Problem: Erosion and flooding of channel causes
property damage
Estimated Cost: $200,000
Magisterial District: Windsor Hills
33. Description: Debris removal County-wide
Nature of Problem: Removal of debris in and along streams
and creeks.
Estimated Cost: $500,000
Magisterial District: All Districts
TOTAL ESTIMATED COST =
$ 10,945,000
20
FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR A ROANOKE VALLEY COMPREHENSIVE STORMWATER
MANAGEMENT PROGRAM PREPARED FOR THE FIFTH PLANNING DISTRICT BY
THE FIRM OF CAMP DRESSER AND McKEE
DATED MAY, 1985
Staff has included the first five pages of the executive
summary of this report. These several sheets provide a quick
synopsis of the storm water management concept and why it was felt
that this approach would be desirable for the Roanoke Valley.
21
e
r
Ci
s
i
i
FINAL REPORT
Feasibility Study for a
Roanoke Valley Comprehensive
~tormwater. Ntanagement Program
FIFTH PLANNING DISTRICT COMMISSION
ROANOKE COUNTY________~__CJTY O_F S.ALEM _ _
^ CITY OF ROANOKE ^ TOWN OF VINTON
May 1985
CAMP DRESSER R McKEE
Annandale. Virginia
22
®~
envvonmental engineers, scientists.
planners 8 management consultants
CHAPTER I: INTRODUCTION
This report summarizes a feasibility study of a comprehensive stormwater
management program for the Roanoke Valley. The information and recom-
mendations presented herein are intended to serve as a study design for
developing such a program. This study was prepared for the Fifth Planning
District Commission on behalf of Roanoke County, the Cities of Roanoke and
Salem, and the Town of Vinton.
CHAPTER 2: DESCRIPTION OF STUDY AREA
This feasibility study focusses on the major tributaries of the Roanoke
River which traverse the four participating jurisdictions. The management
of Roanoke River flooding problems is not addressed by this study, because
the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is currently performing a separate study
i
on this topic. Whereas Roanoke River flooding is typically caused by
tropical storms Qf moderate intensity and relatively long duration, local
flooding along the tributaries covered by this study is typically caused by
thunderstorms of~~high intensity and relatively short duration.
The study area has been subdivided into a total of 39 watersheds, with 20
located north of~Roanoke River and 19 located south of the river. A total
of 22 of the watersheds are multijurisdictional basins which traverse two
more more jurisdictions. The significant number of multijurisdictional
watersheds can be attributed to the "concentric rings" layout of the study
area. Located within the inner ring are the cities of Salem and Roanoke
and the Town of Vinton which traverse the downstream sections of most
tributary watersheds. Roanoke County, which occupies the area between the
inner and outer rings, traverses the middle and/or upper sections of most
tributary watersheds. All 22 of the multijurisdictional watersheds
traverse portions of Roanoke County, with the County occupying the majority--
of the total drainage area in 13 of these watersheds. Three of the multi-
jurisdictional watersheds cover three jurisdictions, while the remainder
traverse only the County and one of the municipalities. Eleven of the
multijurisdictional watersheds traverse portions of the City of Salem, with
23
the City occupying the majority of the total drainage area in 4 of these
basins. Portions :of the City of Roanoke are also traversed by 11 multi-
jurisdictional watersheds, with the City occupying the :~ajority of the
total drainage area in 5 of these basins. Three of the multijurisdictional
watersheds traverse portions of the Town of Vinton. Of the 17 watersheds
which traverse a single jurisdiction, 14 are located within P,oanoke County,
2 are located within the City of Salem, and one is located within the City
:of Roanoke.
CHAPTER 3: QENEFITS OF A COMPREHENSIVE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
There are essentially two different approaches that can be taken for urban
stormwater management:
r~
1. PiecemealiApproach: In the case of existing urban development,
t is option invo ves addressing local stormwater problems without
evaluating the potential for the runoff control measure to cause
adverse impacts in downstream areas. An example is the construc-
tion of a~relief sewer in upstream areas without evaluating down-
stream impacts. In the case of future urban development, this
option involves the delegation of stormwater management responsi-
bilities to local land developers. Each developer is responsible
for constructing stormwater detention facilities on his development
site to maintain post-development peak runoff from the site at pre-
development levels.
2. Comprehensive Approach: This option involves developing a compre-
ensive waters a pan, known as a "master plan," which identifies
the most appropriate control measures and optimum locations to
control watershed-wide impacts. This approach typically involves
combinations of the following: (a) strategically locating a single
stormwater detention facility (i.e., stormwater pond) to contr~-
post-development runoff from several land development projects;
(b) providing stream channel improvements (e.g., removal of ~~
obstructions to flow, riprap, widening, deepening) where necessary
upstream of the stormwater detention facility; and (c) nonstruc-
tural measures such as parkland acquisition and floodproofing to ~
supplement structural control measures.
:'
While the piecemeal. approach to urban stormwater management is relatively
easy to administer, it offers the following disadvantages: greater risk of
negative spillover effects, particularly in multijurisdictional watersheds;
insignificant flood protection benefits due to the emphasis on minor
flooding impacts; ineffective runoff control throughout the watershed due
to tfie failure to evaluate locational differences in the benefits of
24
detention facilities- relativel hi h local costs for f
y g aciltty maintenance
activities; and unnecessary costs for the use of small-scale structural
solutions instead of large-scale nonstructural solutions which are much
cheaper. Included among the potential negative impacts of a piecemeal
stormwater management program are the following: .~
~;
• The piecemeal program may only partially solve the major flooding
problem(s);
• The piecemeal program may solve flooding problems in the upstream
jurisdictf~on, but create a flooding problem(s) in the downstream
jurisdiction;
• Randomly l;ncated detention basins may actually increase downstream
pea ows, ra er an re uce em;
• The piecemeal program may result in prohibitively high maintenance
costs for the significant number of runo contro acs hies;
• Significant capital and 0&M expenditures may be wasted; and
,,:
• The costs of remedial structural solutions are likely to be much
greater than the overall costs if an adequate management program had ~,
been implemented in the first place.
~ 1
The master plan approach offers significant advantages over the piecemeal
approach, includ ing: reductions in capital and 0&M costs; reductions in
the risk of downstream flooding and erosion, particularly in multijuris-
dictional watersheds; opportunities to manage existing stormwater problems;
capability to consider nonstructural measures; increases in land develop-
ment opportunities; increased opportunities for recreational uses of runoff
controls; potential contributions to local land use planning; and popu-
larity among land:. developers. The major disadvantages of tf~e master plan
approach include the following: local governments must perform advance
planning studies to locate and develop preliminary designs for regional
stormwater management facilities local _9 ov_ernments_must__finance,_ design,
and construct the regional stormwater management facilities before the ~
majority of future urban development occurs, with reimbursement by
developers over a build-out period that can be 5-20 years in duration; and,
in some cases, local governments may be required to carry out extraordinary
maintenance activities for regional stormwater management facilities which
r~
25
are perceived by the public to be rirnaril recreational facilities h
P Y t at
merit water quality; protection.
CHAPTER 4: DESCRIPTION OF DRAINAGE PROBLEMS AND FUTURE STORMWATER
MANAGEMENT CONCERrlS
This chapter summarizes existing problems and future concerns of the four
jurisdictions participating in this study.
The majority of existing flooding and streambank erosion problems in the
study area are apparently not the result of spillover impacts of urban
development within upstream jurisdictions. There are at least two reasons
for this. First, the Roanoke County land area within the outer ring of the
study area is relat;vely undeveloped at the present time, while the area
y
within the inner ring of the study area is currently heavily developed.
Second, in those watersheds where the upstream jurisdiction is heavily
:~
developed (e.g., Mudlick Creek), existing flooding problems tend to be
confined to the County's section of the watershed, thereby minimizing
spillover impacts o'ri the downstream jurisdiction. To date, local remedial
action plans which address existing problems have not evaluated the
downstream impacts of the upstream improvement. Failure to consider
watershed-wide effects of the remedial measures may result in the flooding
problem being transported to a downstream location. With the exception of
the City of Roanoke which has already developed a comprehensive local
program, the jurisdictions in the study area are interested in developing
local remedial action plans to correct existing problems.
The greatest concerns about future stormwater impacts are spillover effects
of projected urban development within multijurisdictional watersheds.
Excluding Back Creek' watershed, urban development within the outer ring of
the study area (i.e., Roanoke County) is projected to increase by about
r3flro_;_f~ottr~ rem-t~~bo~t-65 n.--Iii addirtion-~trrisdictions-
within the inner ring of the study area are also expected to experience
increases in urban development with percentage increases ranging from 5-20b
up to 50`I; depending upon the jurisdiction. A watershed-wide approach to
stormwater management is required to effectively manage urban runoff
increases of this magnitude. In the absence of an effective watershed-wide
26
^~
master plan, increased runoff from future urban development in the study
area may cause both internal and multijurisdictional spillover problems.
ay developing watershed master plans to manage future urban runoff before
crisis situations occur, participating local governments will be demon-
strating considerable foresight. Runoff control facilities constructed in
accordance with the watershed master plans will be preventive measures,
rather than the more costly reparative measures that are so typical of
urban watersheds around the~U.S.
CHAPTER 5: REVIEW OF EXISTING LOCAL. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PROGRAMS
This chapter summarizes existing local ordinances and requirements for
stormwater mana~'ement.
Most of the local ordinances do not s ecif stormwater _
P Y management per
formance standards. However, these ordinances typically do adopt the State
Erosion and Sedi(~ent Control Handbook by reference, meaning that the
State's 2-year runoff control performance standard is enforced. The
emphasis of the;~ocal erosion and sediment control ordinances is on control
of erosion from construction-site conditions. The limited number of
references to peak runoff control requirements appear to contradict the
State performance standard, since they are typically based upon 10-year or
100-year design storms. t4ost of the local ordinances include general
references to the development of maintenance plans for stormwater manage-
ment facilities. None of the ordinances present required qualifications of
entities that can assume maintenance responsibilities, although most of the
ordinances imply that maintenance responsibilities are passed onto the
property owner. 'The Town of Vinton is the only jurisdiction which indi-
cates that the local government will assume responsibility for maintenance
of runoff control facilities.
CHAPTER 6: DATABASES-FOR-STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLANNING
This chapter reviews existing databases and discusses data requirements for
a comprehensive stormwater management plan. The databases reviewed are:
topographic maps; land use; soils; imperviousness; stream channel network;
and storm sewer network.
27
RECOMMENDATIONS
Staff would recommend to the Board of Supervisors that the
following areas of activity be approved and implemented:
1. Approve maintenance responsibility as previously defined
in this report.
2. Authorize staff to review and present to the Board of
Supervisors proposed revisions in the erosion and
sediment control regulations to address drainage and
erosion problems.
3. Continue funding of minor improvement projects and
drainage maintenance projects at current level.
4. Authorize funding for the Comprehensive Stormwater
Management Plan.
5. Fund masterplanning for the most critical drainage basin
in Roanoke County. Additional funding for the
remaining streams would be requested in the next two
years.
6. Proceed with executive level discussions and
negotiations with the other local governments toward the
development of a valley-wide stormwater management
concept.
7. Request that the Board of Supervisors give staff
direction on debris removal in streams. Staff does
believe that debris removal could be valuable in
reducing possible flood damage, but it would be a
specific acceptance by the County of a private property
owner's responsibility.
28
ATTACHMENT A
FEBRUARY 23, 1988
PREVIOUSLY PRIORITIZED PROJECTS
PROJECT (DRAINAGE CREW)
DESCRIPTION
Leisure Arts Center
Route 460 West
Jae Valley Road
Vauxhall and Bower Road
5322 Grandin Road Extension
South Park Circle/Willow-
lawn
Palm Valley Drive
5417 Geiser Road
Bower & Vauxhall
4919 Fawn Dell Road
Regrade and rip-rap existing ditch
through County owned facility
located in the Pinkard Court Area.
(complete) $697
Construction of ditches, storm
sewers and drop inlets to drain
the Andrew Lewis Place Sinkhole
(County needs to provide an
entrance ditch from the low point
in the sinkhole to the storm
sewer, otherwise project is
complete) $14,888
Sinkholes to be filled.
(complete) $11,064
Backfill and rip-rap eroded ditch.
(complete) $3,500
Grade and stabilize outlet channel
for roadside storm sewer.
(complete) $200
Remove debris from Mudlick Creek
(50$ complete) $275
Remove debris from Carvins Creek
(90~ complete) $0
Regraded and rip-rap outlet ditch
for storm sewer originating from
Geiser Road
(lOg complete) $291
Backfill and rip-rap eroded ditch.
Extend the limits of the original
project $5,000 estimate
Regrade and rip-rap outlet ditch
for storm sewer originating from
Falcon Ridge Road. The property
owner is participating in the cost
of installing pipe.
$3000 estimate
NOTE: Estimated cost are for materials only.
29
ITEM NUMBER ~ -
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE-BOARD OF SUPERVISORS O.F ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: February 23, 1988
SUBJECT: Resolution requesting the Federal Emergency Management
Agency to restudy a portion of Barnhardt Creek for
delineation of the 100 year flood plain and related
data.
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
~u~~-rzti~~~~~~
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The Flood Insurance Study and related Flood Plain and Rate
Maps for Roanoke County, Virginia were completed October 17, 1978.
One of the__many tributaries of the Roanoke River that was studied
was Barnhardt Creek. The section of Barnhardt__C_reek studied was
from Roanoke City Corporate Limits, a point just east of Electric
Road (Route 419) to the City of Salem Corporate Limits, a point
just west of Keagy Road, for a distance of approximately 3,500
feet. The Flood Insurance Study was revised December 4, 1985.
This revision was specifically to address inaccurate information
in the vicinity of Lot 2, Farmingdale South Subdivision, and
resulted in the lowering of the flood elevation by 4 feet in this
area.
Other property owners in the vicinity of Farmingdale South
have requested that the flood elevations be reviewed in the
vicinity of their property. Based on their request and a review
of the available information, it does appear to staff that the
total section of Barnhardt Creek may be in error. Based on
recent discussions with the Federal Emergency Management Agency
(FEMA) and the Corps of Engineers, funding for the restudy of
Barnhardt Creek is presently available and the study could be
implemented if officially requested by Roanoke County.
The attached map outlines the limits of the requested
restudy of Barnhardt Creek.
FISCAL IMPACT:
No expenditure of County funds will be required.
.~- i
RECOMMENDATION:
The staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors approve
the attached resolution which requests a restudy of Barnhardt
Creek within the boundary of Roanoke County by FEMA.
SUBMITTED BY:
'~~u-~f~
Phillip T. Henry, p.E
Director of Engineer ng
APPROVED:
/~
~~
Elmer C. H ge
County Administrator
----------------------------------
ACTION VOTE
Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs
Denied ( ) Garrett
Received ( ) Johnson
Referred McGraw
To Nickens
Robers
2
i ~ ~ l ~ Ln......q D~d7r.+"".t'-.'t 'j"'~i CR~rtn~ ~~/' w..
~~ HIDDEN ,~~ppWp~Ur~E •~~ ~g O' -. N
~~S syq. f RO _ ~`~~RR
$ $ C • y - CIUB ~ ~ '. Cq C~~~~7inC~~Rtp~p1~~ -
d: x FARMINCDA(,~ \ Cwt C~C ~ Rwo~
~~ ~ ~•~`'w.-a~ :~l ~ a-..LSD-_ ~ ~"~enii ~ ~~, .~ ~,,
NSET~I{L~ g, - pp
~ ~,~JIY i _~~ K1M~AyY./ ~Ayp[1W000~ ,. qLMr"MSA
~` ~ ~ ~ 1• ~ ~~(~ n"w~~G, /CMFSiCg1 ~ PARI
TALL. ~.. }'•~•AY 1k '
V
~- \\W' ~
Tfif~S) tY ~-rt~rrl$I~t4_~ogwt°.oo ~_ 9 _
VICINITY MAP NORTH
,.
=?\~. ~
~'.~ "~ w - .-: ~' '~• ~~..' • - ~ ~ ~` Drive-in
' • • • I
• ~• ~ .
~ • • ~ i
• • • • i j _ --- ~ f
• •,
L _ ~-. -
y _. .
--, .
r . ~ ~--_ ~ _ ~-
_, .~~ r`
`~ - -
--~ . ~
-) .:
~ZM GI •
. \ ~ j _ `.
•_;.- #
JJ 11 \ ) •~ 685`` G ~ ~y~ _~ .
. .1 ~.~c
PUBLIC FACILITIES Area of Restudy of Barnhardt Creek
3
AT THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA,. HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 23, 1988
RESOLUTION REQUESTING FEDERAL EMERGENCY
MANAGEMENT AGENCY (FEMA) TO COMPLETE A RESTUDY OF
BARNHARDT CREEK
BE IT .RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That this matter came this day to be heard upon the
proceedings herein.
2. That the Flood Insurance Study for Roanoke County,
Virginia with an effective date of October 17, 1978 has been
adopted and used by the Roanoke County government.
3. That the Flood Insurance Study was revised on December
4, 1985 to reflect errors in field data along portions of
Barnhardt Creek.
4• That there is evidence to indicate that the field data
along the full section of Barnhardt Creek, being that portion
within Roanoke County, Virginia is in error and that a restudy is
necessary to have correct information concerning the 100 year
flood plain, and other related flood data.
5• That the restudy is important to various property
owners within the County and the restudy could result in the
elimination of unnecessary hardship to these property owners,
there is a need to proceed expeditiously with this study.
4
AT 'I'HE REGULAR MEETING OF TI3E BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VTRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 23, 1988
RESOLUTION 22388-2 REQUESTING FEDERAL EMERGENCY
MANAGEMENT AGENCY (FEMA) TO COMPLETE A RESTUDY OF
BARNHARDT CREEK
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1.. That this matter came this day to be heard upon the
proceedings herein.
2. That the Flood Insurance Study for Roanoke County,
Virginia with an effective date of October 17, 1978 has been
adopted and used by the Roanoke County government.
3. That the Flood Insurance Study was revised on December
4, 1985 to reflect errors in field data along portions of
Barnhardt Creek.
4. That there is evidence to indicate that the field data
along the full section of Barnhardt Creek, being that portion
within Roanoke County, Virginia is in error and that a restudy is
necessary to have correct information concerning the 100 year
flood plain, and other related flood data.
5. That the restudy is important to various property
owners within the County and the restudy could result in the
elimination of unnecessary hardship to these property owners,
there is a need to proceed expeditiously with this study.
On motion of Supervisor Garrett, seconded by Supervisor
McGraw, and upon the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
t
~~
A-22388-3
ITEM NUMBER ~- c~
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINIS"I'RATION CENTER
IN ROANOKE, VA., ON TUESDAY,
MEETING DATE: February 23, 1988
SUBJECT: Elimination of Ridership Fees for the CORTRAN Program
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
i ~~~~~ ~~~~~
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
Beginning July 1, 1987, the Board of Supervisors approved
the continuation of the CORTRAN program which provides
transportation services to the elderly and handicapped residents
of Roanoke County through cooperative efforts with RADAR. The
1987-88 budget included $60,000 for the cost of operations which
consists mainly of charges billed to the County by RADAR based
upon the County ridership. Currently, the County is charging
$1.50 per ride. In order to distribute these tickets to the
remote selling locations or directly sell these tickets through
the County offices, it is currently taking 16 to 18 hours per
week of County staff time. This time was not figured into the
original $60,000 that was allotted for the CORTRAN program.
There is also an additional expense for the printing of these
tickets.
The revenues that the County realizes from these sales is
fairly small. The budget estimated $14,400 for ticket sales. As
of January 31, 1988, only $3,734 has been collected.
The County staff believes that the CORTRAN program is
providing a very necessary service to the elderly and handicapped
residents of Roanoke County. However, it does not appear to be
cost effective to sell tickets for this service. Therefore, we
would suggest that beginning April 1, 1988, the ridership fee for
CORTRAN be eliminated. We have discussed this recommendation
with Curtis Andrews of RADAR who sees no problem with the
elimination of this fee. The citizens may present their League
of Older Americans card (for the elderly) or their Easter Seals
card (for the handicapped), rather than giving the bus drivers a
ticket.
With the elimination of the need for the expenses related to
ticket sales, the CORTRAN budget for the 1988-89 fiscal year will
remain constant at $60,000.
"""
FISCAL IMPACT:
The removal of COR'I'RAN ticket fees would save the County
money. The loss in ticket revenues would be more than offset by
savings in County staff time and printing costs.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the elimination of ridership fees for the
CORTRAN program.
SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED:
~~~
Diane D. Hyatt Elmer C. Hodge
Director of Finance County Administrator
------------- -------------------------------
ACTION ---------- ------------
VOTE
Approved (x) Motion by: Harry C. Nickens/ No Yes Abs
Denied ( ) Steven A. McGraw to approve Garrett x
Received ( ) recommendation Johnson x
Referred McGraw x
To Nickens x
Robers x
cc: File
Diane Hyatt
John Chambliss
ITEM NUMBER ~ -~
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
IN ROANOKE, VA., ON TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 23, 1988
MEETING DATE: February 23, 1988
SUBJECT: Adoption of a Resolution Authorizing the Issuance of
$4,700,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 1988A and
Setting Forth the Form and Details thereof
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
C~- !' ~~-^2d~
~~
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
At the November 17, 1987 meeting of the Board of Supervisors
the Board adopted a resolution authorizing the County staff to
work with the Virginia Resources Authority for the issuance of
$4,700,000 general obligation bonds for water and sewer
improvements and water revenue bonds for $795,000 for water
improvements to the APCO and Valleypointe projects. Staff has
met with representatives from the Virginia Resources Authority
and has arranged to have a closing on these bonds dated March 1,
1988.
Since the general obligation bonds were approved by the
voters of the County by referendum ($3,700,000 sewer general
obligation bonds authorized in 1974 and $1,000,000 water general
obligation bonds authorized in 1986) and since these two
referenda were held prior to July 1, 1987, the County is not
required to hold an additional public hearing on this portion of
the financing as required under section 15.1-171.1 of the Code of
Virginia. Later this evening, a public hearing and a separate
resolution will be considered for the issuance of the water
revenue bonds.
These general obligation bonds will be repaid utilizing
revenues from the water and sewer systems of the County and no
additional monies are required in the current year's budget
process. The rates for the 1988-89 fiscal year and subsequent
periods will reflect the debt service requirements necessary to
meet these financial obligations.
The attached preliminary
from McGuire, Woods, Battle &
County, for your consideration
23, the final version of this
your approval.
draft resolution has been prepared
Boothe, Bond Counsel for Roanoke
. At the Board meeting on February
resolution will be available for
FISCAL IMPACT:
The debt service for the repayment of these water and sewer
~°~
general obligation bonds will be paid to the water and sewer
revenues of the County and no additional appropriation is
required at this time.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the final resolution as submitted by
Bond Counsel,( McGuire, Woods, Battle & Boothe) be adopted by the
Board of Supervisors, which will authorize the Virginia Resources
Authority to issue $4,700,000 general obligation bonds on behalf
of Roanoke County to cover said water and sewer capital projects.
SUBMITTED BY:
~ ~~~
ohn M. Chambl'ss, Jr,
Assistant Administrator
Approved
Denied
Received
Referred
To
Motion by:
ACTION
APPROVED:
~, ~ ~
Elmer C. Ho ge
County Administrator
JMC/cw
Attachment
cc: Diane Hyatt
Cliff Craig
Sarah Rice
VOTE
No Yes Abs
Garrett
Johnson
McGraw
Nickens
Robers
~~ 3 BATT Ei&BOO~TOHE
PRELIMINARY DRAFT
DATED o2 ~~ 7~8~
EXHIBIT C TO
FINANCING AGREEMENT
PROJECT BUDGET
SOURCES:
Local Bond Proceeds (that may be $3,700,000
used for sewer projects)
Local Bond Proceeds (that may be 1,000,000
used for water projects)
$4,700,000
USES:
Sewer
Sub-Project 1 - Roanoke River Interceptor $ 300,000
000
400
Sub-Project 2 - Ore Branch Interceptor
,
Sub-Project 3 - Starkey Pump Station/ 1
000,000
Sub-Project 4 - Force Main
Castle Rock Sub-Main ,
100,000
000
420
Sub-Project 5 - Valleypointe Sewer Extension ,
Sub-Project 6 - Perimeter East/West Ruritan 180,000
Road I & II 150,000
Sub-Project 7 - Glade Creek/460 950,000
Sub-Project 8 - Sewer System Expansion 200,000
Contingency (Sewer)
Total (Sewer) $3,700,000
Water
Sub-Project 9 - Cherokee Hills Water System $ 67,000
Acquisition
Sub-Project 10 - Forest Edge System 131,000
Acquisition
Sub-Project 11 - Carriage Hills System. 35,000
Acquisition
Sub-Project 12 - Falling Creek/Bridlewood 000
110
System Acquisition ,
Sub-Project 13 - Future Water System 657,000
. Acquisitions
Total (Water) $1,000,000
Gran d Total (Water and Sewer) $4,700,000
;'R. ~ i X11 ~1~}-~'~ C ~' f~~
fJATE~ ~-io-g~ _ _
RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE
COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA, AUTHORIZING THE
ISSUANCE OF ITS $4,700,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND
SERIES 1988A, AND SETTING FORTH
THE FORM AND DETAILS THEREOF
A majority of the voters of the County of Roanoke, Virginia
("County"), at an election held on November 5, 1974, approved the
issuance of general obligation bonds of the County in an amount
not to exceed $8,700,000 to finance the cost of sanitary sewer
facilities to be part of a County-wide sanitary sewer system,
including the acquisition of sanitary sewer facilities owned by
the Roanoke County Public Service Authority, the acquisition and
construction of additions thereto and the reconstruction and
extension thereof ("1974 Sewer Project"). The voters at such
election also approved the issuance of general obligation bonds
of the County in an amount not to exceed $6,100,000 to finance
the cost of water facilities to be part of a County-wide water
supply treatment and distribution system, including the
acquisition of water facilities owned by the Roanoke County
Public Service Authority, the acquisition and construction of
additions thereto and the reconstruction and extension thereof
("1974 Water Project"). On December 30, 1974, the Circuit Court
of the County entered an order authorizing the Board of
Supervisors of the County ("Board") to carry out the wishes of
the voters as expressed at such election.
On , the County issued its [$11,100,000]
[General Obligation Bonds] (" Bonds") pursuant to a
resolution of the Board adopted The County used
[$5,000,000.] of the proceeds of the Bonds•for the 1974
Sewer Project and [$6,100,000] for the 1974 Water Project.
A majority of the voters of the County at an election held
November 4, 1986, approved the issuance of general obligation
bonds of the County in an amount not to exceed $16,000,000 for
the purpose of paying all or a portion of the costs of acquiring,
constructing, developing and equipping a public water supply and
related facilities including a dam and a reservoir. On
1986, the Circuit Court of the County entered an
order authorizing the Board to carry out the wishes of the voters
expressed at such election.
The Board has determined that it is advisable to cause the
County to borrow $4,700,000 from the Virginia Resources Authority
("Authority") to finance the cost of certain improvements to the
County's water and sewer systems more particularly described in
Exhibit B to the Financing Agreement, dated as of March 1, 1988
("Financing Agreement"), between the Authority and the County.
The County will contract a debt and issue its General Obligation
Bond, Series 1988 ("Local Bond"), in the original principal
fij - 3
amount of $4,700,000, and sell the Local Bond to the Authority to
evidence the loan.
The foregoing arrangements are reflected in the following
documents, forms of which have been presented to this meeting and
filed with the County's documents: (1) Financing Agreement,
together with a form of the Local Bond attached thereto, and (2)
Preliminary Reoffering Statement, dated February 9, 1988
("Preliminary Reoffering Statement").
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
OF THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA, THAT:
1. Authorization of Bond. The issuance of a general
obligation bond of the County to be known as the County of
Roanoke, Virginia, General Obligation Bond, Series 1988A, is
authorized. The Local Bond shall be issued in the original
principal amount of $4,700,000 and sold to the Authority for the
purchase price set forth in the Financing Agreement, which
purchase price is hereby determined to be in the best interests
of the Commonwealth of Virginia and the County.
2. Authorization of Financing Agreement. The Financing
Agreement is approved. The Chairman of the County's Board of
Supervisors ("Chairman") is authorized to execute on behalf of
the County the Financing Agreement in substantially the form
submitted to this meeting, with such changes, insertions or
omissions as may be approved by the Chairman, whose approval
shall be evidenced conclusively by the execution and delivery
thereof. The Chairman, the Clerk of the County's Board of
Supervisors ("Clerk"), the Treasurer of the County, the County
Administrator and the Assistant County Administrator - Management
Services ("Assistant County Administrator") are each authorized
to execute and deliver on behalf of the County such other
instruments, documents or certificates, and to do and perform
such things and acts, as they shall deem necessary or appropriate
to carry out the transactions authorized by this Resolution or
contemplated by the Local Bond or the Financing Agreement, and
all of the foregoing, previously done or performed by the
Chairman, the Clerk, the Treasurer, the County Administrator or
the Assistant County Administrator, are in all respects approved,
ratified and confirmed.
3. Details of Local Bond. The Local Bond shall be issued
as a fully registered bond without coupons and shall be dated
March 1, 1988. The Local Bond shall bear interest at the rates
indicated below, and the principal amount thereof shall be
payable, subject to prior redemption, on November 1 in each of
the years and in the payment amounts set forth below:
-2-
~~
Principal Principal
Payment Payment
Amount Due Date
$ November 1, 1989
November 1, 1990
November 1, 1991
November 1, 1992
November 1, 1993
November 1, 1994
November 1, 1995
November 1, 1996
November 1, 1997
November 1, 1998
November 1, 1999
November 1, 2000
November 1, 2001
November 1, 2002
November 1, 2003
November 1, 2004
November 1, 2005
November 1, 2006
November 1, 2007
November 1, 2008
Interest
Rate
Each principal installment of the Local Bond shall bear
interest at its respective interest rate from the date of the
Local Bond until such principal payment amount is paid. Interest
on the Local Bond shall be computed on the basis of a year of 360
days and twelve 30-day months. The principal of and premium, if
any, and interest on the Local Bond shall be payable at the place
and in the manner provided in the Financing Agreement. The
principal of and premium, if any, and interest on the Local Bond
shall be payable in lawful money of the United States of America.
4. Pledge of Full Faith and Credit The full faith and
credit of the County are hereby irrevocably pledged to the
payment of the principal of and interest on the Local Bond as the
same shall become due, and each year while any portion of the
Local Bond remains outstanding and unpaid, unless other fands are
lawfully available and appropriated for the timely payment
thereof,-there shall be levied, without limitation as to rate or
amount, and collected in accordance with law, an annual ad
valorem tax on all taxable property in the County subject to
local taxation sufficient to provide for the timely payment of
the Local Bond and interest thereon as the same shall become due.
5. Prepayment of Local Bond. The Local Bond shall be
subject to prepayment as set forth in the Financing Agreement.
6. Execution of Local Bond. The Local Bond shall be
signed by the manual or facsimile signature of the Chairman and
Treasurer of the County, and the corporate seal of the County or
-3-
~-
a facsimile of such seal shall be affixed thereon and shall be
attested by the manual or facsimile signature of the Clerk. In
case any officer whose signature shall appear on the Local Bond
shall cease to be such officer before the delivery of the Local
Bond, such signature shall nevertheless be valid and sufficient
for all purposes the same as if he or she had remained in office
until such delivery. The Local Bond may be signed by such
persons as at the actual time of the execution thereof shall be
the proper officers to sign such Local Bond although at the date
of delivery of such Local Bond such persons may not have been
such officers.
~, Form of Local Bond. The Local Bond shall be
substantially in the form attached as Exhibit A to the Financing
Agreement, with such appropriate variations, omissions and
insertions as permitted or required by this Resolution or the
Financing Agreement. There may be endorsed on the Local Bond
such legend or text as may be necessary or appropriate to conform
to any applicable rules and regulations of any governmental
authority or any usage or requirement of law with respect
thereto.
8. Registration, Transfer and Exchange. The County hereby
appoints the Clerk as its registrar and transfer agent to keep
books for the registration and transfer of the Local Bond and to
make such registrations and transfers under such reasonable
regulations as the County may prescribe.
Upon surrender for transfer or exchange of the Local Bond at
the office of the Clerk, the County shall execute and deliver in
the name of the transferee or transferees a new Local Bond or
Bonds for a principal amount equal to the Local Bond surrendered
and of the same form and maturity and bearing interest at the
same rate as the Local Bond surrendered, subjecrescribeh clfe to
such reasonable regulations as the County may p
presented for transfer, exchange, redemption or payment, the
Local Bond shall be accompanied by a written instrument or
instruments of transfer or authorization for exchange, in form
and substance reasonably satisfactory to the County, duly
executed by the registered owner or by his or her duly authorized
attorney-in-fact or legal representative. The Local Bond may not
be registered to bearer.
A new Local Bond delivered upon any transfer or exchange
shall be a valid obligation of the County, evidencing the same
debt as the Local Bond surrendered, shall be secured by this
Resolution and the Financing Agreement and entitled to all of the
security and benefits hereof to the same extent as the Local Bond
surrendered.
9. Charges for Exchange or Transfer. No charge shall be
made for any exchange or transfer of the Local Bond, but the
County may require payment by the holder of the Local Bond of a
-4-
,~°'"~
sum sufficient to cover any tax or other governmental charge that
may be imposed in relation thereto.
10. Temporary Typewritten Local Bond. The County may
initially issue the Local Bond in typewritten form. If the Local
Bond is issued in typewritten form, upon the written request of
the registered owner of the Local Bond and upon surrender of the
Local Bond in typewritten form, the County shall promptly
prepare, execute and deliver to such registered owner a Local
Bond in printed form of the same maturity and interest rate and
for the same principal amount as the typewritten Local Bond.
Appropriate variations, omissions and insertions may be made in
the Local Bond to facilitate printing.
11. Mutilated, Lost, Stolen or Destroyed Local Bond. If
the Local Bond has been mutilated, lost, stolen or destroyed, the
County shall execute and deliver, a new Local Bond of like date
and tenor in exchange and substitution for, and upon delivery to
the County and cancellation of, such mutilated Local Bond, or in
lieu of and in substitution for such lost, stolen or destroyed
Local'Bond; provided, however, that the County shall execute,
authenticate and deliver a new Local Bond only if the registered
owner thereof has paid the reasonable expenses and charges of the
County in connection therewith and, in the case of a lost, stolen
or destroyed Local Bond (i) has filed with the County evidence
satisfactory to it that such Local Bond was lost, stolen or
destroyed and that the holder of the Local Bond was the
registered owner thereof and (ii) has furnished to the County
indemnity satisfactory to it. If the Local Bond has matured,
instead of issuing a new Local Bond, the County may pay the same
without surrender thereof upon receipt of the aforesaid evidence
and indemnity.
12. Preliminary Reoffering Statement. The inclusion of the
information with respect to the County contained in the section
"Roanoke County" in the Preliminary Reoffering Statement,
prepared in connection with the reoffering and sale of the
Corresponding Bonds (as defined in the Financing Agreement), is
hereby ratified and confirmed and the use of such information in
final form in the Reoffering Statement of the Authority is hereby
authorized and approved; provided, however, such information
contained in the Reoffering Statement shall be reviewed and
approved by the Assistant County Administrator before the
distribution of the Reoffering Statement.
13. Filing of Resolution; Notice. The Chairman and the
Clerk are each hereby authorized and directed to file or cause to
be filed a certified copy of this Resolution with the Circuit
Court of Roanoke County pursuant to Sections 15.1-189, 15.1-199
and 15.1-212 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended.
14. Effective Date. This Resolution shall take effect
immediately.
-5-
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 23, 1988
RESOLUTION 22388-4 OF THE BOARD OF
SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE CGUNTY, VIRGINIA,
AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF ITS
$4,700,000 GENERAL OBLIGA'T'ION BOND,
SERIES 1988A, AND SETTING FORTH THE FORM
AND DETAILS THEREOF
A majority of the voters of the County of Roanoke, Vir-
ginia ("County"), at an election held on November 5, 1974 ("1974
Election"), approved the issuance of general obligation bonds of
the County in an amount not to exceed $8,700,000 to finance the
cost of sanitary sewer facilities to be part of a County-wide
sanitary sewer system, including the acquisition of sanitary
sewer system, including the acquisition of sanitary sewer facili-
ties owned by the Roanoke County Public Service Authority, the
acquisition and construction of additions thereto and the recon-
struction and extension thereof ("1974 Sewer Project"). The
voters at the 1974 Election also approved the issuance of general
obligation bonds of the County in an amount not to exceed
$6,100,000 to finance the cost of water facilities to be part of
a County-wide water supply treatment and distribution system,
including the acquisition of water facilities owned by the
Roanoke County Public Service Authority, the acquisition and con-
struction of additions thereto and the reconstruction and exten-
sion thereof ("1974 Water Project"). On December 30, 1974, the
Circuit Court of the County entered an order authorizing the
Board of Supervisors of the County ("Board") to carry out the
wishes of the voters as expressed at the 1974 Election.
On March 15, 1977, the County issued its $4,500,000
Water Improvement Bonds ("1977 Bonds") pursuant to a resolution
of the Board adopted January 25, ].977. On or about September 1,
1980, the County issued its $8,500,000 Public Improvement Bonds
("1980 Bonds") pursuant to a resolution of the Board adopted
July 22, 1980. On or about November 1, 1982, the County issued
its $10,000,000 Public Improvement Bonds ("1982 Bonds") pursuant
to a resolution of the Board adopted September 28, 1982. The
County used all $4,500,000 of the proceeds of the 1974 Bonds and
$1,600,000 of the proceeds of 1980 Water Bonds for the 1974 Water
Project. The County used $2,000,000 of the proceeds of the 1980
Bonds and $3,000,000 of the proceeds of the 1982 Bonds for the
1974 Sewer Project. The 1977 Bonds, the 1980 Bonds, and the 1982
Bonds constitute the only bonds of the County attributable to the
general obligation bonds approved at the 1974 Election.
A majority of the voters of the County at an election
held November 4, 1986 ("1986 Election"), approved the issuance of
general obligation bonds of the County in an amount not to exceed
$16,000,000 for the purpose of paying all or a portion of the
costs of acquiring, constructing, developing and equipping a pub-
lic water supply and related facilities including a dam and a
reservoir ("1986 Water Project"). On November 19, 1986, the Cir-
cuit Court of the County entered an order authorizing the Board
to carry out the wishes of the voters expressed at the 1986
Election.
The Board has determined that it is advisable to cause
the County to borrow $4,700,000 from the Virginia Resources Autho-
rity ("Authority") to finance the cost of certain improvements to
2
the County's water and sewer systems more particularly described
in Exhibit B to the Financing Agreement, dated as of March 1,
1988 ("Financing Agreement"), between the Authority and the
County. The County will contract a debt and issue its General
Obligation Bonu, Series 1988 ("Local Bond"), in the original prin-
cipal amount of $4,700,000, and sell the Local Bond to the Autho-
rity to evidence the loan. $3,700,000 of the proceeds of the
Local Bond wiles be used for the 1974 Sewer Project and $1,000,000
of such proceeds will be used for the 1986 Water Project.
The foregoing arrangements are reflected in the follow-
ing documents, forms of which have been presented to this meeting
and filed with the County's documents: (1) Financing Agreement,
together with a form of the Local Bond attached thereto, and (2)
Preliminary Reoffering Statement, dated February 9, 1988 ("Prelim-
inary Reoffering Statement").
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervi-
sors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that:
1. Authorization of Bond. The issuance of a general
obligation bond of the County to be known as the County of
Roanoke, Virginia, General Obligation Bond, Series 1988A, is auth-
orized. The Local Bond shall be issued in the original principal
amount of $4,700,000 and sold to the Authority for the purchase
price set forth in the Financing Agreement, which purchase price
is hereby determined to be in the best interests of the Common-
wealth of Virginia and the County.
2. Authorization of Financing Agreement. The Financ-
ing Agreement is approved. The Chairman of the County's Board of
3
Supervisors ("Chairman") is authorized to execute on behalf of
the County the Financing Agreement in substantially the form sub-
mitted to this meeting, with such changes, insertions or omis-
sions as may be approved by the Chairman, whose approval shall be
evidenced conclusively by the execution and delivery thereof.
The Chairman, the Clerk of the County's Board of Supervisors
("Clerk"), the Treasurer of the County ("Treasurer"), the County
Administrator, the Assistant County Administrator - Management
Services ("Assistant County Administrator") and the Director of
Utilities of the County ("Director") are each authorized to exe-
cute and deliver on behalf of the County such other instruments,
documents or c ~rtificates, and to do and perform such things and
acts, as they shall deem necessary or appropriate to carry out
the transactions authorized by this Resolution or contemplated by
the Local Bond or the Financing Agreement, and all of the fore-
going, previously done or performed by the Chairman, the C]_erk,
the Treasurer, the County Administrator, the Assistant County
Administrator or the Director, are in all respects approved, rati-
f ied and confirmed.
3. Details of Local Bond. The Local Bond shall be
issued as a fully registered bond without coupons in the denomina-
tion of $4,700;.000 and shall be dated March 1, 1988. The Local
Bond shall bear interest at the rates indicated below, and the
principal amount thereof shall be payable, subject to prior re-
demption, on November 1 in each of the years and in the payment
amounts set forth below:
4
Principal Principal
Payment Payment Interest
Amount Due Date Rate
$ 95,000 November 1,. 1988 4.50
120,000 November 1, 1989 5.0
130,000 November 1, 1990 5.2
135,000 November 1, 1991 5.4
140,000 November 1, 1992 5.6
150,000 November 1, 1993 5.8
160,000 November 1, 1994 6.0
170,000 November 1, 1995 6.2
180,000 November 1, 1996 6.35
190,000 November 1, 1997 6.5
205,000 November 1, 1998 6.65
215,000 November 1, 1999 6.8
230,000 November 1, 2000 6.9
250,000 November 1, 2001 7.0
265,000 November 1, 2002 7.1
285,000 November 1, 2003 7.2
305,000 November 1, 2004 7.3
330,000 November 1, 2005 7.35
355,000 November 1, 2006 7.4
380,000 November 1, 2007 7.45
410,000 November 1, 2008 7.5
Each principal installment of the Local Bond shall bear
interest at its respective interest rate from the date of the
Local Bond until such principal payment amount is pai d. In addi-
tion, the County shall pay a late payment charge as provided in
the Finan cing Agreement if any payment of principal or interest
is not received within five days of its due date. Interest on
the Local Bond shall be computed on the basis of a year of 360
days and twelve 30-day months. The principal of and premium, if
any, and interest on the Local Bond shall be payable at the place
and in th e manner provided in the Fi nancing Agreement . The prin-
cipal of and premium, if any, and interest on the Local Bond
shall be payable in lawful money of the United States of America.
4. Pledge of Full Faith and Credit. The full faith
and credit of the County are hereby irrevocably pledged to the
5
payment of the principal of and interest on the Local Bond as the
same shall become due, and each year while any portion of the
Local Bond remains outstanding and unpaid, unless other funds are
lawfully available and appropriated for the timely payment there-
of, there shall be levied, without limitation as to rate or
amount, and collected in accordance with law, an annual ad
valorem tax on all taxable property in the County subject to
local taxation. sufficient to provide for the timely payment of
the Local Bond and interest thereon as the same shall become due.
5. Pre ayment of Local Bond. The Local Bond shall. be
subject to prepayment as set forth in the Financing Agreement.
6. Acceleration of Local Bond. If an Event of Default
(as defined in the Financing Agreement) shall have occurred and
be continuing, the principal amount of and accrued interest on
the Local Bone may be declared immediately due and payable by
written notice to the County.
7. Execution of Local Bond. The Local Bond shall be
signed by the manual or facsimile signature of the Chairman and
Treasurer of the County, and the corporate seal of the County or
a facsimile of such seal shall be affixed thereon and shall be
attested by the manual or facsimile signature of the Clerk. In
case any officer whose signature shall appear on the Local Bond
shall cease to be such officer before the delivery of the Local
Bond, such signature shall nevertheless be valid and sufficient
for a_l.l purposes the same as if he or she had remained in office
until such delivery. The Local Bond may be signed by such per-
sons as at the actual time of the execution thereof shall be the
6
proper officers to sign such Local Bond although at the date of
delivery of such Local Bond such persons may not have been such
officers.
8. r'orm of Local Bond. The Local Bond shall be sub-
stantially in the form attached as Exhibit A to the Financing
Agreement, with such appropriate variations, omissions and inser-
tions as permitted or required by this Resolution or the Financ-
ing Agreement. There may be endorsed on the Local Bond such leg-
end or text as may be necessary or appropriate to conform to any
applicable rules and regulations of any governmental authority or
any usage or requirement of law with respect thereto.
9. Registration, Transfer and Exchange. The County
hereby appoints the Clerk as its registrar and transfer agent to
keep books for the registration and transfer of the Local Bond
and to make such registrations and transfers under such reason-
able regulations as the County may prescribe.
Upon surrender for transfer or exchange of the Local
Bond at the office of the Clerk, the County shall execute and
deliver in the name of the transferee or transferees a new Local
Bond or Bonds for a principal amount equal to the Local Bond sur-
rendered and of the same form and maturity and bearing interest
at the same rate as the Local Bond surrendered, subject in each
case to such reasonable regulations as the County may prescribe.
If presented for transfer, exchange, redemption or payment, the
Local Bond shall be accompanied by a written instrument or instru-
ments of transfer or authorization for exchange, in form and sub-
stance reasonably satisfactory to the County, duly executed by
7
the registered owner or by his or her duly authorized attorney-in-
fact or legal representative.
The Local Bond may not be regis-
tered to bearer.
A new Local Bond delivered upon any transfer or ex-
change shall be a valid obligation of the County, evidencing the
same debt as the Local Bond surrendered, shall be secured by this
Resolution and the Financing Agreement and entitled to all of the
security and benefits hereof to the same extent as the Local Bond
surrendered.
10. Charges for Exchange or Transfer. No charge shall
be made for any exchange or transfer of the Local Bond, but the
County may require payment by the holder of the Local Bond of a
sum sufficient to cover any tax or other governmental charge that
may be imposed in relation thereto.
11. Temporary Typewritten Local Bond. The County may
initially issue the Local Bond in typewritten form. If the Local
Bond is issued in typewritten form, upon the written request of
the registered owner of the Local Bond and upon surrender of the
Local Bond in typewritten form, the County shall promptly pre-
pare, execute and deliver to such registered owner a Local Bond
i.n printed form of the same maturity and interest rate and for
the same principal amount as the typewritten Local Bond. Appro-
priate variations, omissions and insertions may be made in the
Local Bond to facilitate printing.
12. Mutilated, Lost, Stolen or Destroyed Local Bond.
If the Local Bond has been mutilated, lost, stolen or destroyed,
the County shall execute and deliver, a new Local Bond of like
8
date and tenor in exchange and substitution for, and upon deliv-
ery to the County and cancellation.of, such mutilated Local Bond,
or in lieu of and in substitution for such lost, stolen or
destroyed Local Bond; provided, however, that the County shall
execute, authenticate and deliver a new Local Bond only if the
registered own^.r thereof has paid the reasonable expenses and
charges of the County in connection therewith and, in the case of
a lost, stolen or destroyed Local Bond (i) has filed with the
County evidence satisfactory to it that such Local Bond was lost,
stolen or destroyed and that the holder of the Local Bond was the
registered owner thereof and (ii) has furnished to the County
indemnity satisfactory to it. If the Local Bond has matured,
instead of iss~~ing a new Local Bond, the County may pay the same
without surrender thereof upon receipt of the aforesaid evidence
and indemnity.
13. Freliminary Reoffering Statement. The inclusion of
the information with respect to the County contained in the sec-
tion "Roanoke County" in the Preliminary Reoffering Statement,
prepared in connection with the reoffering and sale of the Corre-
sponding Bonds (as defined in the Financing Agreement), is hereby
ratified and confirmed and the use of such information in f final
form in the Reoffering Statement of the Authority is hereby autho-
rized and approved; provided, however, such information contained
in the Reoffering Statement shall be reviewed and approved by the
Assistant County Administrator before the distribution of the
Reoffering Statement.
9
14. Filing of Resolution. The Chairman and the Clerk
are each hereby authorized and directed to file or cause to be
filed a certified copy of this Resolution with the Circuit Court
of Roanoke County pursuant to Sections 15.1-189, 15.1-199 and
15.1-212 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended.
15. Effective Date. This Resolution shall take effect
immediately.
On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor
Robers, and upon the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
ABSTAIN: Supervisor McGraw
A COPY - TESTS:
Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
2/24/88
cc: File
John Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator
John Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator
Paul Mahoney, County Attorney
Alfred C. Anderson, County Treasurer
Clifford Craig, Director of Utility
McGuire, Woods, Battle & Boothe, County Bond Counsel
Clerk of Circuit Court of Roanoke County
CERTIFICATE OF CLERK
The undersigned Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of the
County of Roanoke, Virginia, hereby certifies that:
1. A regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors of the
County of Roanoke, Virginia ("Board"), was duly called and held
on February 23, 1988, at which the following members were present
and absent:
PRESENT: Supervisors Bob L. Johnson, Richard Robers,
Steven A. McGraw, Harry C. Nickens, Lee Garrett
ABSENT: None
2.
A resolution entitled "Resolution 22388-4
of the
Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia,
Authorizing the Issuance of Its $4,700,000 General Obligation
Bond, Series 1988, and Setting Forth the Form and Details
Thereof" ("Resolution"), was duly adopted at a regular meeting
duly called and held on February 23, 1988, by the recorded
affirmative vote of a majority of all of the members elected to
the Board, the ayes and nays being recorded in the minutes of the
meeting as shown below:
MEMBER VOTE
Supervisor Johnson Aye
Supervisor Robers Aye
Supervisor McGraw Abstain
Supervisor Nickens Aye
Supervisor Garrett Aye
3. Attached hereto is a true and correct copy of the
Resolution as recorded in full in the minutes of the meeting held
on February 23, 1988.
4. The Resolution has not been repealed, revoked,
rescinded or amended and is in full force and effect on the date
hereof.
WITNESS my signature and the seal of the County of Roanoke,
Virginia, this 24th day of February, 1988.
y'Y~ c~-~-~-..~
Deputy Clerk of the Board of
Supervisors of the County of
Roanoke, Virginia
[SEAL
-2-
_ ___.._ ~~ ~~r;;c~1o~,~;_,~ ~aor'~ Session on Roanoke .River
Tributary Stream. Sl,urly 'nr,~ ^orps of_ Engineers
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The Corps of_ Engineers has requested that the work session
for their presentation on the streams study be rescheduled. They
have found some cost estimates to be in error which have a dra-
matic effect on the project. The Corps would like to have
additional time to reevaluate their figures to make sure the
information they will be presenting .is correct.
The staff hopes to have a commitment from the Corps by the
time of_ the Board meeting as to when they want to reschedule the
work session.
SUBMITTED BY:
APPROVED:
-- ;~
~ c 1 / ~~~/
John R. bbard, P.E. Elmer C. Hodge
Assista County Administrator County Administrator
of Public Facilities
------------------
ACTION VOTE
Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs
Denied ( ) Garrett
Received ( ) Johnson
Referred McGraw
to Nickens
Robers
ITEM NUMBER '_
EGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OpUNTYEADMINISTRATIONNOENTER
AT A R
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE
MEETING DATE: February 23, 1988
T; Appointments to Committees, Commissions and Boards
SUB_ JEC -
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
eals
1, Buildin Code Board of Ad'ustments and A ollins Magisterial
ear term of Norman Eugene Jarrett, H
Four-y fired January 22, 1988.
District. His term exp Services
Court Service Unit Advisor Council/Youth and Famil
2
Advisory Board:
outh member Emily Reaser, Northside High School.
One-year term of y 1987.
Her term expired November 13, Roger Smith,
Catawba District, Dr • J -
Two-year terms of Gerald CMor head, Hollins District,
Marilyn Sherry Robison, Windsor Hills
Catawba DistricVinton District,
Andrew Archer, 22 88.
District, will expire 3/ / rin ,
- ear term of Tracy Rothschild, youth member from Cave Sp g
One y
will expire 3/22/88•
3. Grievance Panel:
Two-year term of Joe W. Himes will expire 2/23/88.
4, Health De artment Board of Directors term expired November
Two-year term of Parker Foley. Mr. Foley's
26, 1987.
~/-S
5, Lea ue of Older Americans: Representative, will
ear term of Webb Johnson, County
One-Y
expire 3/31/88•
p,ppROVED BY
SUBMITTED BY:
~a ~~ `~'~ Elmer C . Hodge
Mary H. Allen County Administrator
Deputy Clerk ------------------------------
---------------------- VOTE
----------------------- ACTION No Yes Abs
p,pproved ( ) Motion by: Garrett
Johnson
Denied ( ) McGraw
Received ( ) Nickens
Referred Robers
To ~-
BUILDING CODE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS AND APPEALS
A. COMPOSITION:
To be comprised of five (5) members; appointed by the Board
of Supervisors. Members may be reappointed, and terms should be
staggered so that less than half of the terms expire in any one
year. The Board of Supervisors may appoint alternate members who
may sit on the Board in the absence of any regular members, and
shall have the full power and authority of the regular member.
Board members shall be selected on the basis of their ability to
render fair and competent decisions regarding application of the
code, and shall to the extent possible, represent different
occupational or professional fields. At least one member should
be an experienced builder. At least one member should be a
licensed professional engineer or architect.
B. DUT_ IESt
Shall act on application for appeals as required by Section.
36-105 of the Code of Virginia; or it shall enter into an
agreement with the governing body of another county or
municipality or with some other agency, or a State agency
approved by the Virginia Department of Housing and Community
Development.
C. MEETING SCHEDULE:
The Board shall meet upon notice of the chairman or at
stated periodic meetings if warranted by the volume of work. The
Board shall meet within ten working days of the filing of an
appeal.
~- - z
COURT SERVICES UNIT ADVISORY COUNCIL/YOUTH AND_
FAMILY SERVICES ADVISORY BOARD
A, COMPOSITION
Board to consist of two members from each magisterial
district, and one youth member from each high school. Governing
bodies of each county and city served by a court service .unit may
appoint one or more members to a citizen advisory council.
B, DUTIES•
Advises and cooperates with the court upon all matters
affecting the working of this law and other laws relating to
children, their care and protection and to domestic relations;
Consultsunit relativelto the developmentlandtextension of
court service
the court service program; the council to serve. on
Encourage the members selected by
the central advisory council to visit as often as the member.
conveniently can, institutions and associations receiving
children unden shof the childrenereceivedtby oruin chargenoftanys
and surrounds g
such persons, institutions or associations.
The Council should make themselves familiar with the work
of the court. Makes an annual report to the court and the
participating governing bodies on the work of the council.
As the Youth and Family Services Advisory Board:
Establish goals and priorities for County-wide youth
services; assist in coordination and planning for comprehensive
youth services within the private sector. Serve in an advisory
capacity and to otherwise assist the Board of Supervisors to
establish goals and objectives in compliance with all "minimum
Standards of the Delinquency Prevention and Youth Development Act
of 1979". Assist in conducting an assessment of the needs of
youth every five years and to assist in developing an annual
Delinquency Prevention Plan, further to participate in evaluating
the implementation of the plan and making a report thereon to the
Board of Supervisors. Provide a public forum where concerns
about youth may be expressed and to receive recommendationreaular
raise concerns of public and private organizations at any g
advisory board meeting upon proper notice. Advocates necessary
legislative amendments to improve community conditions for youth
development and to support the development of needed services
both public and private for youth in the community.
C, MEETING SCHEDULE:
O a uarter the third Tuesday, beginning January; time
ne q
and place determined at meetings.
1~,. ~ --,
GRIEVANCE PANEL
A• COMPOSITION
To consist of three (3) members, appointed by the Board of
Supervisors; for terms of two years.
B. DUTIES
The panel shall adopt such rules and procedures as it deems
necessary and desirable. The panel has the responsibility to
rule on the interpretation, application, and meaning of the
County's personnel policies, rules. and regulations. The panel
shall select for each hearing a panel chairman, set a time for
the hearing which shall be held as soon as practical, but no
later than fifteen (15) full working days after the grievant
appeal.
~ C. MEETING SCHEDULE
The County Administrator shall arrange a hearing with the
panel members to hear the grievance.
r LI
HEALTH DEPARTMENT BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Established by the Nancy M, Welch, Director, Alleghany Health
District on October 31, 1985. Roanoke County will appoint one
individual for a two year term.
Meetings will be held four times per year.
TERM TERM EXPIRES
,~ . Parker Foley 2 years '~/~~~
3767 Kentland Dr.
Roanoke, Virginia 24018
Home: 989-1194
Work: 989-9500
(~
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 23, 1988
RESOLUTION N0. 22388-7 APPROVING AND
CONCURRING IN CERT IA N ITEMS SET FORTH
ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA
FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM I -
CONSENT AGENDA
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1• That that certain section of the agenda of the
Board of Supervisors for February 23, 1988, designated as Item I
- Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as
to each item separately set forth in said section designated
Items 1 through 9, inclusive, as follows:
1• Confirmation of Committee A
Grievance Panel and ~1'ransportationmeand Safety
Commission.
2• Notification from the Virginia Department of
Transportation that the 0.49 miles of Route 1950
(Forest Edge Drive has been accepted into the
Secondary System.
3• Request for acceptance of Hill Drive, Airpoint
Drive and Airpoint Road into the Va. Department of
Transportation Secondary System.
4• Acceptance of water and sewer facilities serving
Hollins-Plantation Shopping Center.
5• Acceptance of water and sewer facilities serving
Meadow Creek, Section 3.
6• Acceptance of Old Manor Drive and Old Manor Court,
Plantation Estates into the Va. Department of
Transportation Secondary System.
~• Approval of a Raffle Permit for the Botetourt
Jaycees.
~~-~
REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OANOKE RCOUNTYOADMINIOSTRATION
AT A gELD AT THE R 1988
COUNTY, VIRGINIA. TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 23,
CENTER ON
p,pPROVING AND
RESOLUTION NO.
CONCURRING RDC OF A VISORSTAGENDA
ON THE BOA
FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM I
CONSENT AGENDA
E IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
B
County, Virginia, as follows:
That that certain section of the agenda of the
1.
ervisors for February 23, 1988, designated as Item I
Board of Sup
t A enda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as
- Consen g nated
h item separately set forth in said section desig
to eac
Items 1 through 9, inclusive, as follows:
1, Confirmation of Committee Appointments to the
Grievance Panel and Transportation and Safety
Commission.
Notification from the Virginia Department of
2.
Transportation that the ~•beenlacceptedointolthe
(Forest Edge Drive has
Secondary System.
tance of Hill Drive, Airpoint
3, Request for accep De artment of
Drive and Airpoint Road 1Ststeme Va. P
Transportation Secondary Y
4, Acceptance of water and nSeCenter cilities serving
Hollins-Plantation Shoppl g
Acceptance of water and sewer facilities serving
5. Section 3.
Meadow Creek,
Manor Drive and Old Manor Court,
6, Acceptance of Old De artment of
Plantation Estates into the Va. P
S stem.
Transportation Secondary Y
A proval of a Raffle Permit for the Botetourt
7. P
Jaycees.
.~-! - 9'
planning Commis 1779
Resolution from the
8 royal of acquisition of 5.
recommending apP,
cre tract for fire and ri.nscarea acilities in t e
a lann g
Back Creek community P gistoric
to close out Va. Division of the Old
9• p,pproval lacement on
Landmarks grant for roof rep
County Courthouse
the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized
2, That of said
on anY
nd directed where required by law to set forth up
a such item pursuant to
items the separate vote tabulation for any
this resolution.
R-22388-7.a
ITEM NUMBER ''~
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE
February 23, 1988
SUBJECT: Confirmation of Committee Appointments
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The following nominations were made at the previous board meeting
and must now be confirmed by the Board of Supervisors. The
nominee has agreed to serve.
Grievance Panel:
Supervisor Garrett nominated Eugene M. Martin to serve the
unexpired two-year term of Richard Robers. The term will expire
September 27, 1989.
Transportation and Safety Commission
Supervisor Nickens nominated Leo Trenor and Mrs. May Johnson to
serve another term as citizens at large, and Charlotte
Lichtenstein, representing neighborhood organizations. These
are four-year terms and will expire January 1, 1992.
SUBMITTED BY:
Mary H. Allen
Deputy Clerk
APPROVED BY:
~~ ~~
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
------------- -------------------------------------
ACTION --------- ----------------
VOTE
Approved (x) Motion by: Bob L. Johnson/Harry C. No Yes Abs
Denied ( ) Nickens after amen ing a ugene Brittle x
Received ( ) ar in i s oe imes erm w is Garrett x
Referred expires Johnson x
To McGraw x
Nickens -~
cc: File
Commit tee File
A-22388-7.b
ITEM NUMBER
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: February 23, 1988
SUBJECT: Acceptance of Forest Edge Drive (Route 1950) in the
VDOT Secondary System
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
On December 15, 1987 the Board of Supervisors adopted a
resolution requesting that the Department of Transportation
accept 0.49 miles of Forest Edge Drive (Route 1950) into the
Secondary System.
Oscar K. Mabry, Deputy Commissioner of the Department of
Transportation has now informed us that this addition is
approved, effective January 26, 1988
SUBMITTED BY:
Mary H. Allen
Deputy Clerk
APPROVED BY:
~~
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
----------------
-----------------------
ACTION VOTE
Approved (x) Motion by: Lee Garrett/Richard No Yes Ab
Denied ( ) Robers Garrett x
Received ( ) Johnson x
Referred McGraw x
Nickens ~_
To Robers x
cc: File
Phil Henry
John Hubbard
RAY D. PETHTEL
COMMISSIONER
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
1 X01 EAST BROAD STREET
RICHMOND, 23219
January 26, 1988
OSCAR K. MABRY
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
Secondary System
Addition
Roanoke County
~' J~ 1
i t. i I ~
~.~JV Y~'! ~"
'. ~AS'Flp 3`SYy6}~' ..
Board of Supervisors
County of Roanoke
P. O. Box 29800
Roanoke, VA 24018
Members of the Board:
As requested in your resolution dated December 15, 1987,
the following addition to the Secondary System of Roanoke County
is hereby approved, effective January 26, 1988.
ADDITION LENGTH
FOREST EDGE, SECTION 1
Route 1950 (Forest Edge Drive) - From Route
221 to a north cul-de-sac 0.49 Mi.
Sincerely,
~~~~~~
Oscar K. Mabr
Deputy Commissioner
TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21ST CENTURY
ITEM NUMBER~_~
AT A VIRGINIAMHELDNATOTHEHROANOKE COUNTYEADMINISTRATIONNCENTER
COUNTY,
MEETING DATE: February 23, 1988
SUBJECT: Acceptance of roads into the
Department of Transportation
the 1985 Road Bond.
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
Virginia
Secondary System using
Staff has previously submitted Board Reports and Resolutions
to the Board of Supervisors and the Board of Supervisors has
approved Resolutions requesting the Virginia Department of
Transportation to accept the following roads into the State
Secondary System: Hill Drive, radednusing thea1985p Ro d RBond
Each of these roads are to be upg
Fund and/or State matching monies.
During the review of the packages submitted on these various
streets by the County to VDOT, it has been determined that
certain provisions of the Resolutions do not adequately address
State statutes. Therefore, it is necessary to rescind previous
resolutions and adopt new resolutions requesting acceptance of
these roads into the Virginia Department of Transportation
Secondary Road System.
Packages for these roads were previously submitted to VDOT
in Decembeimate82• monthcdelay,l but ethes~econstructionrofuthese
an approx
roads should still be completed this summer.
FISCAL IMPACT:
These roads will be reconstructed and improved utilizing the
1985 Roanoke County Road Bond and/or State matching monies.
t
RECOMMENDATIONS:
Staff recommends that Resolutions 6987-12.f for Hill Drive
and 6987-12.h for Airpoint Drive and Airpoint Road hereby be
rescinded and the attached Resolutions for the same roads be
approved to request VDOT to accept these roads into the Secondary
Road System.
SUBMITTED BY:
APPROVED:
Phillip T. enry, P. Elmer C. Hodge
Director of Engineering County Administrator
---------------------------------
ACTION VOTE
Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs
Denied ( )
Received ( )
Referred
to
Garrett
Johnson
McGraw
Nickens
Robers
2
aPPp. 781 u. ~'-{ '\, + ~ ,~~~ / %
``kVNTRIp~E ~ /±Y ~ ~ EEk'!, ~tD.. LEI
609 ~"o~, m ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~f
P ~
>~'~° ~ a°`~Sw~e`~p° VICINITY MAP ~,_ '~ ~ NORTH
,.
e
i2 ~ i4 ~
2004c /~ ~
i i3 \~, I
j~ ~ 3 St3ac
~1i
I /~
i
i ~~
~' ~~
3Ac ~ /
i
T
D!
3
~.
~. % ~ .
i5 a-
i
.a sOAc
r
O ~
4N
Q
U
0=
~~
~ ~ ~
- 8 S7at,Ir_1 ~
'i
!
/
/
~~ i
1~ ~~ \
~ /
/;
~ ; P/O .5002-I-5 ~~
~ • 200' ~ ,/~
;! ~ ~
/
~_
~~ a
~ ~.
~~. 39
~
~ ~ ~
.~ ,~b
~
DEPARTMENT OF Acceptance
PUBLIC FACILITIES of Hill Drive
3
a
~~
AT THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 23, 1988
RESOLUTION REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF
HILL DRIVE INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That Resolution 6987-12.f requesting acceptance of
Hill Drive into the VDOT Secondary Road System is hereby
rescinded.
2. That this matter came this day to be heard upon the
proceedings therein and upon the application for Hill Drive, a
section of road extending from Glade Creek Drive (Route 636),
0.79 miles east of Bonsack Road (Route 603) and extending in a
southerly direction 0.29 miles to the cul-de-sac, pursuant to
Section 33.1-72.1, Paragraph C-1 and funded pursuant to Sect"ion
33.1-75.1, Paragraph A of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as
amended.
3. That this Board does guarantee the Commonwealth of
Virginia an unrestricted right-of-way of 50 feet with necessary
easements for drainage as recorded in Plat Book 9, Page 54, dated
December 16, 1975 and Deed Book 1269 Page 205 recorded on July
31, 1987 of record in the Roanoke County Circuit Court Clerk's
Office.
4. That this Board does certify that this road was open to
public use prior to January 1, 1976, at which time it was open to
and used by motor vehicles.
4
5. That said road known as Hill Drive and which is shown
on a certain sketch accompanying this resolution, be, and the
same is hereby established as a public road to become a part of
the state secondary system of highways in Roanoke County, only
from and after notification of official acceptance of said street
or highway by the Virginia Department of Transportation.
5
I
lc
~ 111 1BE,o N
o ~ ~l
~ 75~ bit.
6A7 ~ 6 , o•
.~ ~"~ VICINITY MAF
~~
t
seep
o i
w~.,
..b.,.
~~
Z:3
N
NORTH
DEPARTMENT OF Acceptance of Airpoint Drive and Airpoint Road 1
I PUBLIC FACILITIES 6 I
__.L -~
AT THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 23, 1988
RESOLUTION REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF
AIRPOINT DRIVE AND AIRPOINT ROAD INTO THE VIRGINIA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That Resolution 6987-12.h is requesting acceptance of
Airpoint Drive and Airpoint Road into the VDOT Secondary Road
System is hereby rescinded.
2. That this matter came this day to be heard upon the
proceedings therein and upon the application for Airpoint Drive
and Airpoint Road, a section of road extending from Bent Mountain
Road (Route 221), 0.09 miles north of Tinsley Lane (Route 711),
and extending in an easterly direction 0.28 miles to Airpoint
Drive and 0.25 miles to Airpoint Road to a turn around, pursuant ,
to Section 33.1-72.1, Paragraph C-1 and funded pursuant to
Section 33.1-75.1, Paragraph A of the Code of Virginia of 1950,
as amended.
3. That this Board does guarantee the Commonwealth of
Virginia an unrestricted right-of-way of 50 feet with necessary
easements for drainage as recorded in Plat Book 6, Page 46,
dated July 9, 1965 of record in the Roanoke County Circuit Court
Clerk's Office.
4. That this Board does certify that this road was open to
public use prior to January 1, 1976, at which time it was open to
and used by motor vehicles.
7
r
.~...DL.
5. That said roads known as Airpoint Drive and Airpoint
Road which are shown on a certain sketch accompanying this
resolution, be, and the same are hereby established as public
roads to become a part of the state secondary system of highways
in Roanoke County, only from and after notification of official
acceptance of said street or highway by the Virginia Department
of Transportation.
8
AT THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 23, 1988
RESOLUTION 22388-7.c REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF
HILL DRIVE INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1• That Resolution 6987-12.f requesting acceptance of
Hill Drive into the VDOT Secondary Road System is hereb
rescinded. y
2• That this matter came this day to be heard upon the
proceedings therein and upon the application for Hill Drive, a
section of road extending from Glade Creek Drive (Route 636)
0.79 miles east of Bonsack Road
(Route 603) and extending in a
southerly direction 0.29 miles to the cul-de-sac, pursuant to
Section 33.1-72.1, Paragraph C-1 and funded pursuant to Section
33.1-75.1, Paragraph A of the Code of Virginia of 1950 as
amended.
3• That this Board does guarantee the Commonwealth of
Virginia an unrestricted right-of-way of 50 feet with necessar
easements for drainage as recorded in Plat Book 9, Page 54, dated
December 16, 1975 and Deed Book 1269 Page 205 recorded on Jul
31, 1987 of record in the Roanoke County Circuit Court Clerk's
Office.
4• That this Board does certify that this road was open to
public use prior to January 1, 1976, at which time it was o en to
and used by motor vehicles. p
5• That said road known as Hill Drive and which is shown
on a certain sketch accompanying this resolution, be, and the
same is hereby established as a public road to become a part of
the state secondary system of highways in Roanoke County, only
from and after notification of official acceptance of said street
or highway by the Virginia Department of Transportation.
On motion of Supervisor Garrett, seconded by Supervisor
Robers, and upon the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
A COPY - TESTE:
~.
Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk
2/24/88 Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Phillip Henry, Director of Engineering
John Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator
Va. Department of of Transportation
Arnold Covey, Director of Development Review
AT THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUN`1'Y, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY A988NI5`1'RA`1'ION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 23,
RESOLUTION 22388-7.d REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF
AIRPOINT DRIVTRANSPORTATOIONTSECONDARY ROADISYSTEM GINIA
DEPARTMENT OF
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That Resolution 6987-12.h is requesting acceptance of
Airpoint Drive and Airpoint Road into the VDOT Secondary Road
System is hereby rescinded.
2. That this matter came this day to be heard upon the
proceedings therein and upon the application for Airpoint Drive
and Airpoint Road, a section of road extending from Bent Mountain
Road (Route 221), 0.09 miles north of Tinsley Lane (Route 711),
and extending in an easterly direction 0.28 miles to Airpoint
Drive and 0.25 miles to Airpoint Road to a turn around, pursuant
to Section 33.1-72.1, Paragraph C-1 and funded pursuant to
Section 33.1-75.1, Paragraph A of the Code of Virginia of 1950,
as amended.
3. That this Board does guarantee the Commonwealth of
Virginia an unrestricted right-of-way of 50 feet with necessary
easements for drainage as recorded in Plat Book 6, Page 46,
dated July 9, 1965 of record in the Roanoke County Circuit Court
Clerk's Office.
4, That this Board does certify that this road was open to
public use prior to January 1, 1976, at which time it was open to
and used by motor vehicles.
5, That said roads known as Airpoint Drive and Airpoint
Road which are shown on a certain sketch accompanying this
ublic
resolution, be, and the same are hereby established as p
roads to become a part of the state secondary system of highways
in Roanoke County, only from and after notification of official
acceptance of said street or highway by the Virginia Department
of Transportation.
On motion of Supervisor Garrett, seconded by Supervisor
Robers, and upon the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
A COPY - TESTE:
.~
Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
2/24/88
cc: File
Phi]_lip Henry, Director of Engineering
John Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator
Va. I)epartmentDo~eo~ r'rofsDevelopment Review
Arnold Covey,
A-22388-7.e
ITEM NUMBER ~ y
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: February 23, 1988
SUBJECT: Acceptance of water and sewer facilities serving
Hollins-Plantation Shopping Center
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The developer of Hollins-Plantation Shopping Center, CBL
Plantation Plaza, Ltd., has requested that Roanoke County accept
the deed conveying the water and sewer lines serving the project
along with all necessary easements.
The water and sewer lines are installed as shown on engineering
plans prepared by Barlew-Neuhoff Associates entitled Shopping
Center Plantation Road and Hollins Road dated June 19, 1985,
which are on file in the Public Facilities Department. The water
and sewer line construction meets the specifications and the
plans approved by the County.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The values of the water and sewer construction are $13,905 and
$19,285, respectively.
RECOMMENDATION:
The staff recommends that
water and sewer facilities
necessary easements, and
execute a Deed for the
SUBMITTED BY:
the Board of Supervisors accept the
serving the subdivision along with all
authorize the County Administrator to
transfer of these facilities.
~~'~
Phillip T. Henry, P. .
Director of Engineering
APPROVED:
L' U ~~
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
'~
------------------------------------------------------------------
ACTION VOTE
Approved (x) Motion by: Lee Garrett/ No Yes Abs
Denied ( ) Richard Robers Garrett x
Received ( ) Johnson x
Referred McGraw x
To Nickens x
Robers x
cc: File
Clifford Craig
Phil Henry
John Hubbard
2
L~J
NORTH
31
4962 4c
3
a0 69 Ac
i
~ r
~ • ~'
4 O
Ac
t Gas Co
~ 3.2
2 83Ac
-O
O~
O
o~ 3 3
a 99Ac ~
~:
~ .,
O~ ~• ~~ d~ 3;5
Tr
,Q
a
/ 3.4 ~' .2
,/ ~ ~ I A C,
/ \
Ro n
°ke
C y~ ~- ~~C~,~~~~
\-_- ca,
--
DEPARTMENT OF HOLLINS-PLANTATION
PUBLIC FACILITIES
SHOPPING CENTER
A-22388-7.f 5
ITEM NUMBER -L'
AT A RIRGINIAMHELDNAT THEHROANOKE
COUNTY, V
OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
February 23, 1988
MEETING DATE:
Acceptance of water and sewer facilities serving Meadow
SUBJECT:
Creek, Section 3
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: D & J Developers,
The developer of Meadow Creek, Section 3, in the
accept the deed conveWith all
has rrgand esewert lineskservingythe subdivision along
Ovate
necessary easements.
The water and sewer lineford T 1 Lumsdend&aAssocWatea
Engineering plans prepared by Bu Meadow Creek date
entitled Development Plans for Section 3,
1985, which are on f ile lne tconstruction meetst the
March 12, The water and sewer li
D epa r tme n t . Tans approved by the County .
specifications and the p
FISCAL IMPACT:
values of the water and sewer construction are $2,710
The
and $9,658, respectively.
RECOMMENDATION: t the
ervisors accep
the subdivision along with all
The staff recomfac al tiestservi g and of up t Administrator to
water and sewer and authorize the Coun y
necessary easements,
execute a Deed for the transfer of these facilities.
~~
SUBMITTED BY:
Phillip T. enry, P.E
Director of Engineering
APPROVED:
~ ~ 1~
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
_ ----------------------------------- VOTE
------ ACTION No Yes Abs
A roved (x) Motion by• Lee Garrett/Richard Garrett x
pp Robers x
Denied ( ) Johnson x
Received ( ) McGraw x
Referred Nickens
Robers x
To
cc: File
Phil Henry
Cliff Craig
John Hubbard
J l
L ~ 4TH;: $UN:
l'
f5v /_) t ~ UnF
~
``~ ~~
~11pWAY~ ,. ~rMl
1~V. ''~s4u 4-' .
~ ,.
.
,~ ~
~
~
4wM 4 HI
~i' Nom. ~ HILL ~-
,PO
~ ~[Mfl~~FppI
' ,
`
} ~
\~(^~-"'
;6~p5~ ~
Site ~ ~~ HIVA
w ~ I ,. $ cao~~
y ~~
. ~ __ -~- '6RaNOtq ~Ei~'~a
LAU ~c tar BRiDtE' ~'ta ~a~
._. ®._~ MIL ~
~
_.
I
~'~""A`OR-; ~/PJ ~
VICINITY MAP °;
10f ~ ~
___,._ ~~~Pntance Meadow Creek, Section 3
.r
ITEM NUMBER
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: February 23, 1988
SUBJECT: Acceptance of Old Manor_ Drive, from Lot 6, Block 2A to
Lot 9, Block 2A of Plantation Estates and Old Manor
Court, from its intersection with Old Manor Drive to
the cul-de-sac at .Lot 14, Block 3 of Plantation Estates
into the Virginia Department of Transportation
Secondary System.
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
Century Development Corporation the developer of Plantation
Estates, requests that the Board of Supervisors approve a
resolution to the Virginia Department of Transportation
requesting that they accept .05 miles of Old Manor Drive and
0.11 miles of Old Manor Court.
The staff has inspected these roads along with
representatives of the Virginia Department of Transportation and
find the roads are acceptable.
FISCAL IMPACT:
No County funding is required.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
The staff recommends that the Board approve a resolution to
the VDOT requesting that they accept Old Manor Drive, from Lot 6,
Block 2A to Lot 9, Block 2A of Plantation Estates and Old Manor
Court, from its intersection with Old Manor Drive to the
cul-de-sac at Lot 14, Block 3 of Plantation Estates into the
Secondary Road System.
' i
SUBMITTED BY:
APPROVED:
~~ V
~~ ~_
Phillip T. Hen , P.E.
Director of Engineering
~, ~ l~
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
-----------------------------------------------------------------
ACTION VOTE
Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs
Denied ( ) Garrett
Received ( ) Johnson
Referred McGraw
to Nickens
Robers
2
~. f /~
wynUG..vw
_ .~
11 "'^p"1 ~ I i
`` rn~lml _ v_ lt5 _ ~
. ~ GENr' v`Y-'"`"'toR ., 1, 4ET~~ may. _: •~
>. ( _ O -/-ti.'~o ,t~oc~+. ~s • 1, raw, `~ ` ~~~ ., 21'
~:'
" 'N ~, °ws~r~O°y'iw,u ~0.1MN4.6E _~~~~ ~'Cy, C ~n[w ; r~
c' "4W0t y 3 V/ a[~Irax
M.wo;;
~ .CAPRU t q~p
~,Y ~ I
~ ~ I \ ~' ,
- ~ ~$ - __
Y~.~ ~ C A anw~y,~:_3 ~ ' - l ---~--,~~jr9~~3U~ -•. `-- YWTC€~D ~-- ~.. 4M ~ p~j s
,pax:. ~t0+? `~ ~ 1 _.F:."•.a'r/dv7a0~ ~, _~ ~OU/woStC.~~ '-~-~- _ __.:/~/
~__~ ~ -~``; taoua~vrllu ,~ VICINITY -MAPS g ;---- ~`:--
`~'
N
NORTH
1 ..
'ar 17 13 _
°
f;,, . ~ IIa
I
/~~ •~7 /, ~ ~/! ~
'If' 1
k'4 ~' a 15 14 N RAa Ca ScAaa~
~
'ke
` I Boavy
11.82 Ac
y
b ~
Q~ err
/
11
•
.~
.9
i
~Qf
/)
s'4. 24 '~e
)~.p d~
f
'r, /// /i 23 ~
1
37 • r~ g 5.!1
/ !)-0I /) K ~ 119.1!
? 196 lu'~
_ to 36
27 6
° ,3~
s /e
~ t y e
u9.o .°. q N9.ri
,23
14
2 °
/
n
e4 33
c~ d
_ ~ ,
:
~
" 9t,ts
23
15
28 7 3 ..:, .
if /I
2 /I
r '•
.
s =.09= 3.13 h sac
ti
34 4 I,o s s rss
'
F s
e ~ 7 /a
111
~~. 33
0
ltl.:s ~ I2
u .9!
t
~ 23.17
.r
~t 'Q
Qi
n I 9 / ~
B " loo /i o
0
d
30 16
a ~.I I as
o
1 s
d q, 32 ~ ~ - - - ,
,~ ~ 23
18
• .
" I
~O n
E j _ ~
t
Y
~,p
"
` ~ IS
S o 2310
. loo
14
''
J
_
° ,
^
~
20 ,
23.19 d
ss s
-
tr `-
a 31
I I
F uz.9s •i
J -
23
9 • a
14
° .
,
IS goo ' 21 . .. 23.20 ~
• 23
q' u
` I ~ ~ ~ n
1 s.u
a a 12
/~
13 $
: ° 23.13
+ ' s.gl,4cfp)
4.14AcfC)
y
c I
a ` / ~
ay - ar - 1u.19 _ ao 23.21
. to w
~
~
° ~ ~ ~ Old ' ~
q » ~a _ 10°
=
19
113 0 17 16
spot
l
23,22
. N 3
O
26 to ~+
sa r 5 ~ .23.1 .23
3 ~ ~ II fl i ~,
"s» ~
.
.23.4
7p ~ .23
s
~ Io ;
a
.23.6 „
- s ss a.,, \ c '
ro
•o
- - it 42 43 44 45
//
Q /J IJ
/~ 116.lTI0
~y INISI
n I
- ro e~al
.s.sl >'o ros salro
//
Q Q
/O
SO 49 48 47 46 ~ I
4
I
i'
~~i
I
e
. i.:
Acceptance of Old Manor Drive and Old Manor Court
PUBLIC FACILITIES 3
.r..-~
~~
AT THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE
COUNTY, VIRGINTER ONLTUESDAYE FEBRUARYC23NT1988MINISTRATION
CEN
RESOLUTION REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF
OLD MANOR DQFVTRANSPORTATIONRSEOCONDARYTROADESYSTEM IA
DEPARTMENT
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That this matter came this day to be heard upon the
proceedings herein, and upon the application of Old Manor Drive,
from Lot 6, Block 2A to Lot 9, Block 2A of Plantation Estates,
and Old Manor Court, from its intersection with Old Manor Drive
to the cul-de-sac at Lot 14, Block 3 of Plantation Estates to be
accepted and made a part of the Secondary System of State
Highways under Section 33.1-229 of the Virginia State Code.
2, That it appears to the Board that drainage easements
and a fifty (50) foot right-of-way for said roads have been
dedicated by virtue of a certain map known as Plantation Estates
Subdivision which map was recorded in Plat Book 10, Page 9, of
the records of the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke
County, Virginia, on May 22, 1986 and that by reason of the
recordation of said map no report from a Board of Viewers, nor
consent or donation of right-of-way from the abutting property
owners is necessary. The Board hereby guarantees said
right-of-way for drainage.
4
3• That said roads known as Old Manor Drive and Old Manor
Court which are shown on a certain sketch accompanying this
Resolution, be, and the same are hereby established as public
roads to become a part of the ,State Secondary System of Highwa s
in Roanoke Count y
y, only from and after notification of official
acceptance of said street or highway by the Virginia Department
of Transportation.
5
ETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERTYSADMINISTRATION
AT THE REGVIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUN 1988
COUN'1'Y , FEBRUARY 23 ,
CENTER ON TUESDAY,
REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF
RESOLUTION 223_88=7~~----
LD MANOR DRIVE AND OLD MANOSECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM INI
0
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
BE IT
County, Virginia, as follows:
to be heard upon the
1, That this matter came this day
s herein, and upon the application of Old Manor Drive,
proceeding
Block 2A to Lot 9, Block 2A of Plantation Estates,
from Lot 6,
nor Court, from its intersection with Old Manor Drive
and Old Ma
1-de-sac at Lot 14, Block 3 of Plantation Estates to be
to the cu.
S stem of Sta e
accepted and made a part of the Secondary Y
wa s under Section 33.1-229 of the Virginia State Code.
High Y e easements
2, That it appears to the Board that drainag
ift (50) foot right-of-way for said roads have been
and a f Y
virtue of a certain map known as Plantation Estates
dedicated by Page g of
was recorded in Plat Book 10,
Subdivision which map
ds of the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke
the recor reason of the
County, Virginia, on May 22, 1986 and that by
dation of said map no report from a Board of Viewers, nor
recor ro erty
onsent or donation of right-of-way from the abutting p P
c uarantees said
The Board hereby g
owners is necessary.
right-of-way for drainage•
3, That said roads known as Old Manor Drive and Old Manos
an in th
Court which are shown on a certain sketch accomp Y g
be and the same are hereby established as public
Resolution,
S stem of Highways
roads to become a part of the State Secondary Y
ount only from and after notification of official
in Roanoke C Y -
of said street or highway by the Virginia Department
acceptance
of Transportation.
n motion of Supervisor Garrett, seconded by Supervisor
0
Robers, and upon the following recorded vote:
Su ervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
AYES' p
NAYS: None
A COPY - TESTE:
~'
Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
2/24/88
cc; File Director of Engineera~ng
Phillip Henry,
John Hubbard, Aof1ofaTransportataonnlstra or
Va. Department
Arnold Covey, Director of Development Review
A-22388-7.h
ITEM NUMBER =-
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE•
February 23, 1988
SUBJECT: Request for approval for a Raffle Permit from the
Botetourt Jaycees
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The Botetourt Jaycees has requested a Raffle Permit. This
application has been reviewed by the Commissioner of Revenue and
he recommends that it be approved. While this is a Botetourt
County organization, they hold their meetings and the raffle in
Roanoke County.
The organization has paid the $25.00 fee
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the application for a Raffle Permit be
approved.
SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY:
~~~. ~~`~
Mary H. Allen Elmer C. Hodge
Deputy Clerk County Administrator
----------------------------------------------------------
ACTION VOTE
Approved (x) Motion by: Lee Garrett/Richard No Yes Abs
Denied ( ) Robers Brittle x
Received ( ) Garrett x
Referred Johnson x
To McGraw x
x
Nickens
cc: File
Bingo File
~.. ~' L
z ~ p~ RpANp~
F
o a2 ~ ~ L
COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA Z p
l8 38 G7
COMMISSIONER
OF THE REVENUE ~
1838
APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO CONDUCT RAFFLES OR BINGO
Application is hereby made for a bin o
This application is made subject to all Count or raffle
ordinances, rules permit.
enacted hereafter andnwhichulations now in fo Ceand State laws,
signed a are hereb ~ or that may be
pplicant and which shall beydeemedd to by the under-
which this permit is issued, a condition under
All applicants should exercise extreme care to ensure t
cY of their responses to the followin he accura-
and raffles are strictly regulated b g questions, gin o
of the criminal statutes of the Vir inia g games
y Title 18.2-340.1 et. sue,
4-86 et. seq, of the Roanoke Count
the County Board of Supervisors to cond Code, and by Section
.Y Code. These laws authorize
tion prior to grantin uct a reasonable investiga-
sixty days from the fil~na bingo or raffle
g of an a Permit. The Board has
permit. The Board may den pplication ~o grant or den
organization found not to be~inuspend, or revoke the Y the
state law. strict compliance withecounty and
Any person violating county or state regulations concerni
permits shall be guilty of a Class 1 misdemeanor.
uses any part of the n9 these
gross receipts from bingo or raffles for any
purpose other than the lawful religious, charitable, commun'
or educational purposes for
cally organized p which the or p 1tY~
exce t for reasonable p ganization is s ecifi-
be guilty of a Class 6 felony, Aerating expenses, shall
THIS APPLICATION IS F^vR: tcheck one)
RAFFLE PERMIT /
BINGO GAMES
Name of Organization_~~i ~"
~ / ~~
Street Address
Mailing Address ~C
City, State, Zip Code
%l~ (/,,~, a~~~r~3
Purpose and Type of Organization
~~~~ro.~~~-~
- ~ ~ ~~
~ ~~ ~-AI ~ i4T 1 r, r f
When was the organization
founded? ~9(~Sj'
i
Roanoke County meeting place? Uri 5 ~-~~
Has organization been in existence in Roanoke County for two con-
tinuous years? YES ~/ _ NO_
Is the organization non-profit? y
_ NO_
Indicate Federal Identification Number #_
Attach copy of IRS Tax Exemption letter.
Officers of the Organization:
President:
- !r Cs R
Address : _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i H ~
c~
Secretary:
b ~,~ !~
Vice-president ~
Address:~5~ ~~~~ ~~ ~ ~
`~ !1 r-
o i~ ti~ n ~ „~_4 9-i ,~ ~ t7~
'J ~'~^ ~ ~~ Treasurer:
Address : (U ~ '~ ~ ~ ;~.,~ ~ j
Address:
~~-c~W Y~ '~~i~~
Member authorized to be responsible for Raffle or Bingo opera-
tions:
Name ~~~~ ~~L~
Home Address ~~i'`/a ~~/~~i9~~,~
Phone ~~~-~jL~ / Bus . Phone 907 //UC?
A COMPLETE LIST OF THE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF CURRENT MEMBER-
SHIP MUST BE FURNISHED WITH THIS APPLICATION.
Specific location where Raffle or Bingo Game is to be conducted.
RAFFLES: Date of Drawing 3 ~~
~ Time of Drawing 6.~C
BINGO: Days of Week & Hours of Activity:
Sunday
Monday
Tuesday
Wednesday
Thursday
_____ F r i d a y
______ S a t u r d a y
.From
-- To
From
- - To
From _
- To
From To
From To
_
From _
To
_
From To
2
~-
BINGO: Complete the following:
Legal owner(s) of the building where BINGO is to be conducted:
Name : /N~ l c(a y .2`iC~~ - fJ./~/~J~?`
Address:
County Rc~v~Nr~,k~ State~~Zip
Is the building owned by a 501-C non-profit organization?~
Seating capacity for each location:
Parking spaces for each location:
ALL RAFFLE AND BINGO APPLICANTS MUST ANSWER QUESTIONS 1 - 19
1. Gross receipts from all sources related to the operation of
Bingo games or Instant Bingo by calendar quarter for prior calen-
dar year period.
BINGO INSTANT BINGO
lst Quarter
2nd Quarter
3rd Quarter
4th Quarter
Total
lst Quarter
2nd Quarter
3rd Quarter
4th Quarter
Total
2. Does your organization understand that it is a violation of
law to enter into a contract with any person or firm, associa-
tion, organization, partnership, or corporation of any classifica-
tion whatsoever, for the purpose of organizing, managing, or con-
ducting Bingo Games or Raffles? S
3. Does your organization understand that it must maintain and
file complete records of receipts and disbursements pertaining to
Bingo games and Raffles, and that such records are subject to
audit by the Commissioner of the Revenue? y~S
4. Does your organization understand that the Commissioner of
the Revenue or his designee has the right to go upon the premises
on which any organization is conducting a Bingo game or raffle,
to perform unannounced audits, and to secure for audit all re-
cords required to be maintained for Bingo games or raffles?
yEs
4
._.-
5, Does your organization understand that a Financial Report
must be filed with the Commissioner of the Revenue on or before
the first day of November of each calendar year for which a per-
mit has been issued? y~S
6. Does your organization understand that if gross receipts ex-
ceed fifty thousand dollars during any calendar quarter, an addi-
tional Financial Report must be filed for such quarter no later
than sixty days following the last day of such quarter? ~~~
7. Does your organization understand that the failure to file
financial reports when due shall cause automatic revocation of
the permit, and no such organization shall conduct any Bingo game
or raffle thereafter until such report is properly filed and a
new permit is obtained? ~~S
8. Does your organization understand that each Financial Report
must be accompanied by a Certificate, verified under oath by the
Board of Directors, that the proceeds of any Bingo game or raffle
have been used for these lawful, religious, charitable, commu-
nity, or educational purposes for which the organization is spe-
cifically chartered or organized, and that the operation of Bingo
games or raffles have been in accordance with the provisions of
Article 1.1 of Chapter 8, Title 18.2 of the Code of Virginia? ~~S
9, Does your organization understand that a one percent audit
fee of the gross receipts must be paid to the County of Roanoke
upon submission of the annual financial report due on or before
the f first of November? y~~S
10. Does your organization understand that this permit is valid
only in the County of Roanoke and only at such locations, and for
such dates, as are designated in the permit application? yc~
11. Does your organization understand that no person, except a
bona fide member of any such organization who shall have been a
member of such organization for at least ninety days prior to
such participation, shall participate in the management, opera-
tion, or conduct of any bingo game or raffle, and no person
shall receive any remuneration for participating i~~ anagement,
operation, or conduct of any such game or raffle?
12. Has your organization attac able toe the Countyaof Roanoket
fee in the amount of $25.00 p y
Virginia? DES
13. Does your organization understand that any organization found
in violation of the County Bingo and Raffle Ordinance or §18.2-
340.10 of the Code of Virginia authorizing this permit is suben~t
to having such permit revoked and any person, shareholder, ag
member or employee of such organization who violates the aboveen~o
having such permit revoked and any person, shareholder, ag
member or employee of such organization who violates the above
referenced Codes may be guilty of a felony? j~LS
5
_~'
14. Has your organization attached a complete list of its member-
ship to this application form? y~.S
15. Has your organization attached a copy of its byl~wL~tAC~~~~s~ ~~ra~
application form? yES -~Ov/~Qy~rQ~,JS X~~G'V°~~lJ~l'UG~~,~.NbS F/CC~
/16. Has the organization been declared exempt from pr erty taxa-
tion under the Virginia Constitution or statutes? ~~S
If yes, state whether exemption is for real, personal property,
or both and identify exempt property. 'N/~ ~~-- ~-~" ~~ ~
17. State the specific type a~npd purpose of the organization.
°/18. Is this organization incorporated in Virginia?~~;5
If yes, name and address of Registered Agent:
19. Is the organization registered with the Virginia Department
of Agriculture and Consumer Affairs pursuant to the Charitable
Solicitations Act, Section 57-48 of the Virginia Code?
(If so, attach copy of registration.)
.~/ Has the organization been granted an exemption from registration
by the/~ irginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Affairs?
~(,_ (If so, attach copy of exemption.)
ALL RAFFLE APPLICANTS DESCRIBE THE ARTICLES TO BE RAFFLED,
VALUE OF SUCH ARTICLES, AND PROCEED TO NOTARIZATION.
Article Description Fair Market Value
~`~~~ ~"l'~~r ~~ ~~~~ l.hr,.~~: r tc a is
6
~~
ALL BINGO APPLICANTS MUST ANSWER QUESTIONS 20 - 27 BEFORE
NOTARIZATION
RAFFLE APPLICANTS, GO TO NOTARIZATION.
20. Does your organization understand that the bingo games shall
not be conducted more frequently than two calendar days in any
calendar week?
21. Does your organization understand that it is required to keep
complete records of the bingo game. These records based on §18.2-
340.6 of the Code of Virginia and §4.98 of Roanoke County Code
must include the following:
a. A record of the date, quantity, and card value of instant
bingo supplies purchased, as well as the name and address of
the supplier of such instant bingo supplies, and written
invoice or receipt is also required for each purchase of in-
stant bingo supplies?
b. A record in writing
the number of people
amount of receipts
(These records must b
of the dates on which Bingo
in attendance on each date,
and prizes on each day?
e retained for three years.)
c. A record of the name and address of each individual to whom a
door prize, regular or special Bingo game prize or jackpot
from the playing of Bingo is awarded?
d. A complete and itemized record of all receipts and disburse-
ments which support, and that agree with, the quarterly and
annual reports required to be filed, and that these records
must be maintained in reasonable order to permit audit?
22. Does your organization
be conducted at such time as
and only at such locations
this application?
23. Does your organization understand that the gross receipts in
the course of a reporting year from the playing of instant Bingo
may not exceed 33 1/3$ of the gross receipts of an organization's
Bingo operation?
24. Does your organization understand it may not sell an instant
Bingo card to an individual below sixteen years of age?
25. Does your organization understand that an organization whose
gross receipts from all bingo operations that exceed or are ex-
pected to exceed $75,000 in any calendar year shall have been
granted tax-exempt status pursuant to Section SOl~C of the United
States Internal Revenue Service?
(Certificate must be attached.)
understand that instant Bingo may only
regular Bingo game is in progress,
and at such times as are specified in
is played,
and the
7
26. Does your organization understand that a Certificate of Occu-
pancy must be obtained or be on file which authorizes this use at
the proposed location?
27. Does your organization understand that awards or prize money
or merchandise valued in excess of the following amounts are
illegal?
a. No door prize shall exceed twenty-five dollars.
b. No regular Bingo or special Bingo game shall exceed One Hund-
red dollars.
c. No jackpot of any nature whatsoever shall exceed One Thousand
Dollars, nor shall the total amount of jackpot prizes awarded
in any one calendar day exceed One Thousand Dollars.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
NOTARIZATION: THE FOLLOWING OATH MUST BE TAKEN BY ALL
APPLICANTS
I hereby swear or affirm under the penalties of perjury as set
forth in X18.2 of the Code of Virginia, that all of the above
statements are true to the best of my knowledge, information, and
beliefs. All questions have been answered.
Signed by:
Name
Title
Subscribed and sworn before me, this
My commission expires:
~Q~r ( ~ 19
PLEASE RETURN THIS COMPLETED APPLICATION T0:
R. Wayne Compton,
Commissioner of the Revenue
P. 0. Box 20409
Roanoke, VA 24018-0513
I2 ~ .~~~~°~ ~~~~
Home Address
19 Q~
8
~-
NOT VALID UNLESS COUNTERSIGNED
having been found in due form, is approved
The above application,
and issued to the applicant to have effect until December 31st of
this calendar year.
/ ~ ~ 'missioner of the venu~-
Date
The above application is not approved.
Commissioner of the Revenue
Date
9
~~
State specifically how the proceeds from the Bingo/Raffle will be
used. List in detail the use of the planned or intended use of
the proceeds. Use estimated amounts if necessary.
!/ ~
h
GJvrrr~' ,or~~~ 9~ ~' - i~ ~ ~
j~~ K~
~_
"'--- 3
-,~
..
~~ ~
~ ~ ~)
~ roQr~ 1
~p ~~m~
"~ p~0
o~~
N '~- ~
/~ w ~ ro o o`
~~ • ~
~ ~ :p~mc Q
a~ ^ ~
O~ ~
~,
~ ~
2oF Q .Oo ~ 2
~ c '~' a ai ~ 'r
0 4
u 0.., aF ^ ~/ ~
o ~~ ti? p ti'°~ J2 p O
.y 't N'° ~ 7, p ~
m ~
w ~ r4,,J O m m
QE ~~ 0-2 ~ N ~'C
~W ~~ "y E OC • W
~Q.
ti
H~
ti
0 2
ti ('Q'
O ~
~ o
0 0
N ~
O ~ ~O
O~
~ ~O
O
II~ A~ m
h~l (-t t~i f r
(a:C.i.i~, t~i :i l.:i. t~~~ r ~' _~ r" I•:: +_ t:~ ~ ~ ::~. r- Fa
'~~ ~
F-I~~+I~IE::
tai C:t r~t F::: 1-i ~{. ~; --~ t i c ~:
L~ ~1 "~
G~lylr'
tai F•3 t°I E.. l:.t E3 - :Sts' .1. J
F: t~l c1 i. F~
HT.1I? '..~~'~•.r:.:: t_: C,c'il=if.?r ta'F
r': ei ~t r: ct k: F~
iy, ~:i
'~r°'CJt.J?
E.I'°1 F'
(::}1~Y1 1.:1.1 +_~1it~r-ry 1°•17. 1. 1. .F1 Y" a
F ci ~ r'. cat i•.: t::
tY~ :;l
r-IC31~IE~ ~ L::~'.-tip<:
ra ~~
E.t~IF~'
:(~?can r'.4~.
;:a:li} rat .,_ g T::+t:a:, :i .~ca
s::. ~!' ~ ~ L~
}}
L~ I'.)rt"~~,
... .. ..
F:~ i'~i F'
1`J (-tt'!I: f-1 C::ritF't'":~
t:a c r ~~
_ F~ j ;1;) i . ! 1 ~J .`art (r:' .L Ir+ t~-~ 1-t Y- Il F•~ r-1'd f? 4
4':~
,:',~ ~ ' 4
1-Il~ll~i
L_!~1 r'
~t r i t'.1~.:
t=tLil:1 {~it. 1. ~ Fra: '." ~t~;~~,
S.1 ~ 1. t».~.~ i.:L :l ~~
°,1 ~
t
[[
11., ## ,...t_!-- ,r L~--t:~~ t to .{.
'~=ir=ijE~~::3
t~df~~t-iE_: Z~t:it~iF~:c~r
f 'ck t..t .1.
f_:t(ii_ `.... r.
..,..::Lt`:5 L~Y'e~C]Sris?VJ
titer:{. F.:?fYt
Y L'~.
.:... ~ ~ ~i':_t'.
~, > ~.1`'
~~F'C~1.1
r ~1r='
tai Fa tyi ~_ F~ ci ci't I°t
1. c~ r. r...,{
~,i ~-a
t
T :C:i :~
E~ d.i t-:y `Y.
I r'. Idl I'"'
a•; i__
rii:liviL~
!!J Ci Fi t~::
w~-'f_31 I~n
C~ i"I F'
i~irii~IF~: :(~c?~a~c~}r
1.)~rir~?. ~.
f~17t::+ Lit `vi „ :lac?r; i `.acs
`V c:!
.;: s€ 7. _: ~~
:_
t•~ C:t R L~::
yF't_1Li'::a
E: i~~i F`
k ~ i.1 r" 1'" :i. E::'
.V ~
qq
.L .~ .~
.i.4 i.}rl.`i.
E. i`f i~''
i`i~~:l'vin
~ i n F~' G:! s ~.. e
i _.
•~r
*::
`.~iF'C:1tJr
E=i~1F'
i~E~1°IE :C-~c?4~rr~~r!
t•~1.Jl.l 4: :.
J.~Ca 6'~i~t:.[?t~'r~iclf~:
1°ti C4 cl Cl C} ~•~: E
!~1 ~
t~J f: ±~; h`:
1; 1:~ ~::i y:
~ h.l 1.
L.. P' F_'
t.~;~.i; i :L `d ]. t3 l:l>; t rar' d t=ice t~ n
~~_
'Y :K
~'
T t:) :p:
1:~ i:? t"t'v
)~:hiF'
I'd t~ h4 E~ C:S ~.~ r- k: r
i'i 7. C" i•::
fic}~flC'71•tF~'
'~
.... ......... .... ~ ~.. L~ ~ ~'.
..... 4. .... _
' F.:~
L~f4ii '
i~it=~ivi~: t~t~.trri~!C~7.1.
W<:xr~ r- ~~r'~
'd r!
.~_' ~4 ~ > 1. ~_
T iri ~
~~ T) t~ Y'
i`!(•tt•il: ;~:t'tw~r_~mr~r~
ra r~t :i t ~t t_ a
li:l.!.l:} ... ,... ,
~. ~:>~i !}~ vd ~ r,;t_tr~' :t ~t'.:_ir; rtta
n n ~ r~ c? k: F~.:~
`•.•,
..~ S~• i~! 1. ~...
~~1(ri ~f }~~.
r h1F`
F11:;1:) ~• t~ :t :;~' ~ ~ r! c1 ~•~ r t~~ T? r- i. r,: r:a
I"1 Cry c-S i'l t::3 E•C E'
t:i~
i ii
a:. /a. ~«1 1 42
.F{ 1.i is-1 Y` r ~;;;'~ .' 1 ~' ~• r,
i'~: ht F'
I~~r~r~IF ~~_ ~ };
i c.;rrtmv
H1.iL~ a:.r~:ti~ i~c:twm~a.r't .itr-t~r:~~'t'.
`J r~
t
j3
77
.~S'C ~_! 1 s..
Fs Llht.,~ t ~c f ~ 1~:w:: i i~.°j:
F:t~IF'
,.J C:: ~'
r°il?IJ i2t :~~ n Y.iC:t`.•: :_~ s '_!
~ Fir' C.I'4' C? r c:l
~,.~
L... c:: r. t... ~.,
Iti. t~If `
o r-~
t=~L!.t_; mss;%.~c: H~t'tfi_c~rt i_..an
ri t7 ~-t r7 ct f~: ~'
'J s~~
:~,,~•, ~ 1 c,.
t~J
1 !~_~r l`i ~. ~~C7 C7 ""'t":t L:; E7 ~_~
i~ti~r;i~~~:
~F't:j~iti ~r~r~ti-t
r::t1F`
I.1. rYl rY1 ~'
r 1j:;U {~;±' .._. ~ Lac:!.; 1 ~;c3
I rc?~~'l.'v'z Z .I. c~~
~v c:1
1
t-I ~:) iii I = '=:+'~';~; --: ~ ~:! I :;•'
ltJ l~1 F ~~~:
E !°1 F'
tai Ft l"i t~~: L c~ ?~~ q tj r n
t:~h~~rl i~
a-t 1..~ i,~ 1t i~ L a:. ;~ c't r7 r.l r:~ r~ r7 L.~ r~ a. v ~~
icY~rtnk:~
'v'ti
~J i:1 Fi k~:
~{ .iJ Ft Y
rtiF`
I`.it~tt~tt~ CJr°caah,;
1~: c,~,~
I~ C:i ~!' i ~ k: E•'
~~ c:1
:~_' ~ i_! 1 ci
t-iuh1f:~: ~~?:.iti-°d}fit it~i
T i) #~
j-i '(~ f-'1 Y
i~it:~l~1r ~:ic:as
M`d~•3r°1F~ l~}t~_~~r7 ~: i t~: k:
l~1 a.:l. 3. i. ;a rrr
c..., :: h111I
1 ~9• til :l. '."~ F•i ].:1 r:l ~'t7 Y" :•a i'r C.l 1~ ~"~
f~~~l_1 L~ F" n I~I n ~4.1i: .,...J .:: d't' .. ...
i••t t:~ ~ r7 cy k: twy
Ft c, Crt n c~ i•:: r;~'~
tJ r~
ivt f-i
H~1r=f~:
va U F~ t-~:
7 ; ~. ~-~ °,-•' t:; t i d:f.
4~ i i F;: F~::
{ ll F=t .v.
ti Uhl `Y .~
;~. F-` I..i l1 ~~
~sF'LIU
r~: r~i F°,
1~lylf
fut~~rrrlF~. E~c~rni ~T.r?rr
t*lfaf~'il:: E: r.~~:F~~r-~:
.t.J ~?'~..L 5"' t
r~i7Jll
'~:.~i:r'.'i• 1''it•=~:~r1c~t~ac_'Y"c?_t'. ~=;~
F:al>>~ 1. '1 ~:.::?~ 1y1;~~~wratat~ i:~r- ..
`r f-i
1`i f,i
F-i(.ll•IE.
H(jf°1f::.
W ('Wi F i ~~:
~ C:t F{ F~~: . _. _..
:[ ~i ~~ 1. `,y•'-.t.,~._- :l ! :l ?;
,
ins !_~i":~
~
.ks X?F~'r
`i:i I-' U Ll ;a
~ti F-' lJ lJ `.:~
L"~i~lF''
E ;~1F~~`
i'ar~r~iF~: ~ ~t:,,~>:
i~a~ar~lly: F- ~~- r- :s ~> i~,~1.r'~~tc~n
I:f~yft
a...
...
_~' .~, . -i
..:.., •, . ... ....
f°3 ~ 11 ...t:; , , a
Li •,~} t: ~: VJ r'.'~ Y" 'C. t•-i'd C.
~J ~t
HC]i~iF~ 4r~i:{F;F~::
'
. '.`
L'
' ~~ 1~
~ a_ ~ C.S ._ .~
.
~
_... i
' .
c_.rlr°
~:_i~lr ~
r'~F=ir~i~:~ !~° ~. i nt~ iw~~1°'it=: F~ :l a. n•t
"
~
r',.~
~:>r~n r r ra
i~r''Y• ,~r~r
3'
~r(
f S.l
~
f"'~ t ``
l
i', h~ :I. n j~;f c;l ;•: ~ !..... /
I•=1 ~.1 .t-j F'\ M .~. n ri (-1'r i :~ ~. :~~
.
._ F= i r'~r~'~a.~... 1. t~a~
V ~a
1
.: ~•~
:1MF=:
I-1i `;> v :l --1 t:~ ~: 'r'
HCa 111'=: `:T ~:~ :;~ --1. i ~;~' ~' .
' C7F~tiF~::
W
WC:IFk:: t 1. --~:;~:;t>:~:.
~+{ .
av.::..~' ..
L{ Li Fl ~ .
'v` i.~ i 1.r :_~ ~i•
C~ I) r=1 Y' i > a:b i :>:.` ~~: J ~ ~:~
`wl"`~i..} ,'~ d.~L•~~°I fly
.:_; ~ i E~ rr~~
~,
,~ ~~
.:_ I~. t. 'tY) ~:_
I: I'_i
:Et IJ A'Y'
E~ lai 1'='
i_? r:I r' ~~
7
ty)~
_
•
~
H01°'iE
!~ Cl F•i E~~:
j-{ ~i {'yl i
E: I~t F~'
r•i ~ r-~ r_I'~~
.L) cl .!. e-. V 7..1. a. e
' ;! .~t
~~ } `.:
;af't_II_)ci ,ti~~Ca("il"1Ci'
tr:l~IF:.
i'~r'tl"i~:: t:~t'-~:t
11. Ct'i
~=t Z i I:) ;-:~'~;:~' ~~ i__ i ~i~. ~i:. 7. e ~-. i_-a 1°l (~~ 1:1
1 t"..i ~ i...~ c~ k: e
'N n
i~ i .i ~'ti f~•.
~I'~`i_iLl~;
F~:i41I:
1`J t:~~ I"'I ~ F~ t..t 1. t_-i
.I.he~
r~~~I~ii~'i ht. I. :, :E:tc?< rat:-3'~~'
I r c? t..t t ~~ i.:i.:i. e
HCIi'°iL'
~I.-of-~r::
_:1"1 F`
i~JF~i'~IF i:7ar-nett
:J~me~ Ia
~i (~ .I. f.~' V ]. 2 ~. E'
vj .:t
WC:iit~::
IU
~ w'll-'
i'~~F•~h'{E~ i~ar~st
ks e rt }~
F~~L:il~ _ ~ti.i}'S
F' i.! Ir;i~i
1,~'irt:1. e',+:1..l. E'
'v H
y_::} i~ i t3:~
1-i 7i~1!
~+clr~t•~::
.( ~i #}
LiHY'
i~:lrlr'
f'~1i=,!'°1F: i~;etar-hc?.r-~~
Iam
i~-! I.? IJ f.:, i. i t-i ~ '' E:1'f_ 1"i e r" 4V C7 iJ C! ~i t` n
t~ rJ ci rt e;s h'i i 7.:1
'.~
I"t I:i r~ •,:
'mar='tW)t1`~ l...a~.tr°~.t'
~~7 F:? t'r {';
1•b) -~
f-iu r'i F.
l~luff~; ~;i...... ~~'i.
.a I'' CJ l_~ ~i
C i4'i ~'
f i r.: I'i r~+. r" c~
J t
~~ j. ' ~::
Hur`i~
.~ ~.)
T.i N ~r
~~f='t:ll1 ca
E: Pi ~'
f~I3t? •.~;:~!:f3 Hi. c~~;:l Gan[ ~~~c
~V~ ct
t
Wf~F;f`.
~. ~_;
.U f=t 'r
::it-L1t.l.~ fit:;iJ~rt.
f: ~~i F-'
I~ h'i rJI i~. f`i i~ [.~ (_i ~~ n i-i I
f~i c; ~~ f'T5 r t
r~L)i:i ::~f:~::`_=, :=;:i. cin~=t i. hi a. 7. 1 ~!r- n
f': r:; ~.~ i...i n }::
"•d'
Ht~l~i~ :~':!-{•:=:~-fit :l .~
!1Jt~lf=~f~::
:t ~:?
. f•i't
J '~~ta:~ 1
rr
E _ Pit'^'
!~~d[1i e
I~i ~ ~ a i-~ tr; I•~:
'v;~
.~ ~• i 1 ~.:~.
f IUP~i~
WU17f~::
T !:? #-f ;:f to :1 '-- :~:::L _.. ;f i c3
~~.~f"'~.~I.~~
f ~ I"i f='
ra ~ i~i~ i:~ r- t~ s ~~
f~ r- :~ r. f::
-~ ~~; ~) _'~~~;.i i. {.J f ~ , _t 1, v ~3(._.
r~, t.:, ~~.,-, ~, ~:: t:
l% ~a
~iF'lJl.l`
~ rvif='
iu i~ i~l ~ f-i ~ t7 ~ t"
`M cl
._ .: _._
Hui ll~ ~. _.. .... ,..~y~ :. ..,
~'>;~::--'.,c.,_~r~~.:
1 .~ 1 'b~
r:rir='
r~iF~~i~ir i'-its L J.
i=i i C:: i•~:
...
;::~~'i a ~`~~}•'_ F'7. ~nt.~~~t.a. un i•it~
;~c~a?n c;k:~
'Y cl
:~ ~•
~f ' CL.~U ~7 °I" i'.. ~t('= Fry V
idil-"'
lw~ c:t Y` :!. C~
~~
;'::Fi1Y
..r . ..
_,.....
~'t:~ iJ w7
E 111'='
hi ~:~ r- E;
1='tc+~~n c+k: e
~,'
WflFik~:
E_
E: I°'1 F='
t=,r~r~ Fig a. ._ ~:~t_~:>: .~..~:.t{.
~? r'=~
.:::.`I.i;;i..r ./
C.y i_J
~
~ ~J
11
-
G I'~II '
i~l~r-F::
i=i I~ Y_1 =1• ~ :I. ~ I'f J-J (;} .~ .I. 1 I`i rr r; C:I
~~ i. ~i
..:::I. t~} :1.:....
i-ii::~i"if=:
WCihk::
F~ U r~~l y:
I``I ~'
I..~d~
r~~;l:? I? s.F F, 1. i~ J•1 ~? . f~ 1 r ~. c~ a c-~ !_~ r-
'~' hi
r~c~lel
(~1 i::ir; F~::
:~~ UH`~
wi{'~'t_1t_1a~
Iwl F~~ fy'I E: N a r- i,1 i. •r' •¢
C~ t_i r- t i ~
..I..I,_ C}ut 4~ i 1 7.
VH
w+
i-i (CJ~~ i"i L
~~ 4 ~ F'•.
;a F= LlLJf3
I~ k='
Ikt ~ r N:.
'~ ~
:_'1.Ft~i 1 s f
`'"' {'='t: 1.
~ 1 ,.a
(.~ ~ I I"'
t'•{t~t"iE i-Io1 1 i. r+~<wc~r-'~'.hi
f-i ~ r° r- v
+-•, _
~+
~ i~
ui t::i I I•~~:
:L ~} #
F~ [1F1 Y'
~. lyl ~.~
i'~d1=,1~'if_: Fii:;:l :l s!-~[:!~>th ~_ar-i_i~a t'~ft~,I"li=~. 1-i~y1. ]. i!°i,,1`~tNCrr`~.:.i`t
F C.:) t i
~t,Tt
...
s=~: is i;i r'~ ~ k: t} F c ~n r_5 6:: cW~
,:_ U~~
;..
1~L.t1"tG i~~~lry~:?'7~.._~~ Hl.~lyll~. ..}~rj__:-Yt)}•~{!.
WC]Fi~~: ~;'~`.~--Ea r't~u WCiF;F~~:
r~,i...,t.t~,}r^ti i~l~ ~ CJC:{.~, '7 i•' ~_7~.~•=i F'cl'~ ~.= 1
h:: i}'i F::'
~: i'.1 ~~
I~lf~i1"Ifr i-it..tfai')E?Gi i~liahlL ~i,:avcF~t
_..
......
'
'
14'ivr tlt~ ~~t[^rElcl`) L~~ J. g Lac):: :~':~:
FF~
t ir~ Fi i. t_I c~ r.,
L~ 1 a
P•I t.: _
F-{t_lial~ d.}Li.rd-iti.~~t_)ty
WC7F;h~~: i-aCahitr:
SL'Cl~ ~
i~I~IF='
{`•d(tP''iE- ~7cil~i»3 {Wf-tI°i~ ~Ii.31~li~_oi`,
~:! ~# f i:)~in n y
1o~nca)•::to
~~1 err;
~.,~ V
vn
f-i C:i ~ ~~
.>c? ! ._' 1. CJt.7 r.::~
F"IC.7I~{L::.
~=}~~,ct.'_;.:,C3 J. /
tai C ~ 1=i k:: ::'~ ~ `~' -- `.~ t} i~J )
T r_: # l :Ct ~#
-
.swt L}~aY'
~~'('iU'
iw:!`Ih~' EhiF='
tilt=~M>~: h~;:i. r-h:t: i'J~3{'"{£~ L~t7. r._~ti~a
~: cl t:i i F:~
i r.? rn
?
I'~L~Y ~.J~~.,•~J F-I(n~;ic~.c.tr.j~lial'° ~..)r F'i~.)l~
.
W Ct Fi: F`: : ~~ S~•:~:: - :l ~3 xa. 7. t-I [.l CYi ~: ::': ~~. ~'~ - 4:~~ :,::'•
]: L~ ~ WC~Fh-:
.a_.~__
~i 7}h~~Y
':~ iy{! ?
I~dral'1f<: l_.~~wric;rn
r•~iril"Ir,:: i_..<Kirltrtr'Ss I''I i. ~: ~~
-l~?J:1 iy"i i I : Fw•~
_ W ~ ~..~ -_ ~ ~ ,r_
F~'r• ~~:i 11r-:r~ t. q vr••~ ~. ~t~ cE..E-.:.
t~•i J_~L1 ...
,.Y
F? t. ~. n .~~C.1:: _./i.Sf3~
-
y'r i? 1 ~ ra r' t F~=: i. r'! rf F~~ d ~ :t? ~.~ 1 !~ •~- i :l :I. ~~
`J`~
Fi r~i°!rr~!~n~_I
rl LJ ICI }_ ;J 1~.:' _. }. / ~.! •~
.
1.~ t_i hi F~•.
:1: t:?
:a~= (.ll..i
F::lyi1-~
Iur~i~ll~. L~wi ~ i`ar~tl~i~~ L_onc
)?)
F~tl S~.~ki~)~i' I~li-..arthwc?c,,.:i i:?r- Fi~;t':1 FiFl~~ 19 ije:a.: ~-t:~t
. Ft J, !..! ~ Ft ]. i~l i1 Fa
1'{ Gy ~ 17 C? !•:: F?
F-i U I"1 E ~ ; ' -~ r-:1.:~: =';
i-i CJ I~f ~
t
I I~l O -._~°~'~:--il'J `,' ~.
~~ :I
~:
:
I I:1 #t
;
~ __..~~'~.~-.~i:}•- :t ~:'~• a
' tt
~ ~~ f' 1 Y .
.
.
i
J. ~ ~ .~. ~'! 1 ~ j'I' .c .
((
.Y
.tt ~..~ ra
iF"'Cji 1
I_~ 1"(~'
h~1~IF'
t~ifil~~iE:: E...c~nn~~~'<< I`.lr°il~~l~ LOC:7~'?E'
J~a. _i. 1.
r ~:?:!:? r"ic~!~tF~
:I.~ :;';~i t~_: ~-=! ~ ~ a. ~ !. ci ~ t. r- F~.. ~~~ t ~~ J:? t~~ F; f. :1. J. , J~ c.~:;; ~ ~_' ~•
~'J G1
ly7 `~
{i
4JCJF=iF~:: ~e,~w.,._~1,43;t:~ i~C3~:k::
1: t:? #k ~ Li ~
.
.
: .Y
:~ t?H
e :i~F~ ~. ._ ,_
~,r`Ut..J~~~r~~. a ~: ~ Y
(Vr~i~1l 1~'lr_t~iei 1 1
I~dr~l~~lE= I.._~ac?~li=~ l.I~V1CI (')~
C~ 1 ~~ n r~ ._
F=~r~>Jt~ it 4 1 1 L~c~: ~•~~• ~tl~~a~ F;t ~:
;~ ~ ~! _~
F-IiA+iaik '~~'~r'.._.~.!~.~' J..~.
y Nt_JI°IE. ~5'.~-1. "_:::~'.
1~-UF~F•. 4~CiFtF'•.
.
I~I~IF'
F~!`'li='
~.Iw~thii:~: i°1i J..i ~r !;Ir~t~ir:::: lYii 1 w~rc
F11?L? lib L_.F?C' (•-1VE-' i~~,:= f-i~L? i~ti~ :,'n ~(~}}-' 1lC~t-~t
~1G?c~fl(:}I::t'~' ~Ui^YlE:~Il~i"t
~~, ~.,~ l~ ct
.t'.~1•~-! 1. .G a=~f•l)E~C.+
H l
+I'f F'.
_ (
~1:
i
1
.?
1:.:::~'^hi';--G'?ii•r~r'?'
.~ Li ~ -: .
..:..t:.. °': i~j-- ~. C:} .
.
.
.
..
~:ii...,i.)i..~t `:,i-'LJi.~~i i':.~t~i~t`
lit-``~!°iEw i~I(:awt,r va~f i;l~h'iE. }'°lr..t1 1 :i rtC~:
_., ..
..
F~t:i:C:} r~,~6~1•:~:; ~:>~rcrtr•::.~<.;t.~}r L?r° r~t.?L? _
bl•`;`~i3 G:!r_(t=~rr-v i.?r a.v(~:~
tJ ~x :? ti
.~..
r _
......
~i.~i~r
~
.
~ {~f~..
au
a
{.
j~
CC (~] i I j
~
°~~' i
I:::1'~!F` ~:iyiF
i`df-trlE::: i~'r~t~:~~r-.~r~::nn Cw(='il~it::: }"'f~rtr_i1.~atnrt
E:S c} h i:i a r •t.
~)
V C:! ~' a
i'-Il:ih'i~: s~~'::-::-'=~•C}~,c, Ht::1i~1i~:: yt} r-'~_(~}e.~c>
~F'i_~I_~; ,~~ ~ ta.:i. (na ~i-='r_~~.~~ ~~~rti~~•-~i ~:,
i:~i''ih~' Ef~1i='
td~ii~Iiw ~='t:}r..}:i. (::~ i`•.iF~tt1E=: f~c}r.-.,1. r,
..
i~1~.1tJ ~....
'-i• ~ JI'~ ~ E?T'7M'l . r-l~%E?. (~~tS::}~? ~F `~~ F'~~r-trtL•~`~ai =,:: ~:trt i ~:~ F~t~•r
ice: (.} ci i 7 C] I•~: t"' i'{ f.] :~ fl (.} ~:: r_•~
~V C~ ~J F~t
:,.~ ~ ; ~ ~
vt. C l ~
( [~ , , _..:... ~..ii..~i~~~_ .,:.~,rs"-~:~ ti, .fit
tiF'f.~t.~;~ ~~(='iJU~ i~9i. 6:: (-a F'c?c:}:i. N~
i~i~ahlE: f~C~-?cit:~r
:r~lm
f~: c?:~ r~ c.? i<: i:~
`•J
..'. R~ t? :1:~..
I~:h1f '
i•~.lF~~h1~:: c~arvF~r
F-1!_tn t r" K~
V ~::r
HL:ihih~: `~~'~:'--ilf3~~
I~JC)F~i1~~:
T11 #
:f s 1;i i=1'v
w f;' i~.+CJ a
t~lf-~
l~ifilYif~' vsc~}r-~c1F~r-
y ;~ fin ~:I. t:J
("'}.L~ 1..~ -..a...i._ ~ h I C:! ~•~ .i. ~:.} T C:! l"a r'} ~-'1 ~.J E.:'?
`~
H~~+iri~:
T I'> #
f~ THiY
t~f°'t:i~.l~;
`.. hif"
i~iHh'it: f~mi. ~:.t~}
C_h.~r:i i. k=
h~
.. `` ~f _
~~. °Y!..~ ! ~
T I.) #
~t L}haY
w F` {:.l 11:7
i.yi f='
i'~I :~ ~: <<~
f~tc~tar'}ai::~
4~ a
H C:i h1 ~:
W{71~'t f~:
i~:h'ir--
iuAhiin= 7ci'}~:~ni~:
~;• ~
~.,_.
SF`CI~I~ F'~am
h.: i"i F'
hJF:~h~IF..: 7h~~et.
T:t r i ~ n
Y C-
~
'
{
:!: L? #
L? r=t'Y
f=:1~ f"'
Ghr:i.
~Ge}r}c?k:~
~' ja
i
5 f=' (71..1 L~a
f~i~~r-•
t~Ir=ah1E .wirti th i'~Ir"41~t~: ~imi. th
~. r F5 ~ 1~1 C`' r` ~~.
~~I~iL '1~~~ Wil.citl!_trst t:::t;~~~, Hf.?I:i ~Ei i~iexF'1Er !:?r'~
!~; r_i C`~ n is k: Ez ~+ :i t_i ~ h i iJ i~ E?
HC1h1E' ~w~t.~G-~; fir, ";:~.'~ i-iC71"!~:
WC:iF;k::
WC:~Ftt~; I D # '°' w i i-i:i~F•- ~ i;;iY~
1:rJ #
~ D(/iY ii~}li~il/5c{
D I?6-1Y
~N'C~It.J~
• ~IY11^`
`'
l h11
idF~af`'9E•: ~rni. 1°.I`i Wr=5h1E: ~mi th
r=a ~i L> ~.. , ~•
r_~ ~.;.~ ~.! C~; r e E <n ~ ~ ~r I;~ r' A ~ I? ~`:; ~:~ 1'=~ ci I~' ~ c=~'t_ H i I J. r"3 v E:~
I::;Ewnt ~.r'~~i~k: r~=7fa'l-. ~:~ 1.:Lt;:~ F;c~~~r~c:iE::e
H'tiC:i~n~(:f? ~c"j
w
:,~d~. i 1 ti NL+iYI~:
WCl~ik::
`
'
I:):? # .,~~W,:I..._yi~i-~a~ii :L~ l:~ra' :1
111i:,j.i
~,
E~ i)Fa`r' J. ii j :I. 1 % ir,~'. ~;1~'fwiL-~;
f= I'~I~'
51~'C7t_~~
i~l~tl`'IE fit. a (~I ~i r'
ItaF~thir: t:am~. th-f~1. i:~c.t_tm
(7~r-v
tdlrlr`Y f-aL?L? f-~t ~• q F~a:; ~~e.~ .l.
NI!L} k:ici?. .~,d~•._, "fr`cat..it.vi :l 1 ~
Da'1 Ea~i ]. 7. ~
U~
Va
W(_~l ~:
~iF'LL!5
~F'Ci(..i~.~
f_ 1'~I F' E=. iv11~'
I~Ifah'i~: Si°. an I Er~~r hIi~MF~ ;gut 1. i f~ f
Dean
ral:)I:i f~::E,n
~ f: .I. 4 ~Ca%; .(1 ~•.....~ t-YZ-)Ii ~•i:i h'1a~:i I ~ Dr..
i"~' i n c ~ ~~ i'_ 7. ~
_ D 7. t_t ~ Fi i r_i [:~ rw
va {J ~
)1"1 ~
H 1 K r :' _..1~ ~ r~ r
1-I Cl h`I ~ ~? ~7:~i_' "'.:::~ (~ ~. ~ .
..
WC+~:F-~: :~cstS°~:~'~1~1
WC7f:k~:
' f•~ i°l~'
1'~If~'
E"
i~dAi°fi_ W~;:~~'f:?r
i'~yF~ji~ii:_: i.~J~~~:~••,~u+~.
- < ~ , r-91? L? n
:,''Ei i~t ;
ii::jF~F~::
l~ 1~~~~h~: . ..
: I. #k
J .
~..,:. ,..,.
.
~::1~1~'
i~ ia'i ~'
Yd E~~ i•i E~ tJJ i.:L :l i ~ m •
f'~ r`~t i°1 E: %J!~ h ~ r-
C h ;a tr' .I. ~~ __
V c'7.
t
` c~
. .., t
_ t__+
,..,:_; ;
. ,.. _
:..
_ : ~
~ r, !
: r-~ i
l S
. .
~
._ .L . .
......
Yy ~~
h{ L f ~ 1 y.
_ { .
'~; F' i~i i_I ic3
i"_i,iw,
~. l41 r~
i`v1r:=~P-1i-. i,~i. 1 l.:i. ~rr~:~ tan
i`draiJii: l•~i:i. ~ a.:i. im~_~
" ~
t: i ca t_! r
I
r' r7'v
.
h c~~1 f.~: rfl
~~f-1
7,,1 F~}
WC'IF~:
iyii~f~h~:
_.....
jai I_?Fj Y .. .
F l~9F~
E~ I'=1 ~'
i!ir~~~i-iE:: ~: i tr•:r~i~r° ii'tn
ia~-~}°1C: ~~3•d nr? ._.
L1
Llct`v`.1
'..
i
~ 1 :'
~
- ~
r:i:., ~) -
.'.'. Y..
E:3
t..?+
._ , 7 , i. 7_? F• is r s r, F
i:lca;:ar~:~•?~:ca
~t r`~~
y r.:!
.~ . 5~. 7.~ .+. v_ i
S'1' . ~ .~ CJ
. .
••, .
:~•..... c ..,.
~. j_? ~i~
1_? W
t`
iN G1 ~ r.
fW:1=iF'
E::t°ii:
ITEM NUMBER ~_`~
._
AT A REGULAR MEETINGTOTHEHROANOKE OCOUNTYEADMINISTRATIONNOCENTER
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD A ON TUESDAY,
IN ROANOKE, VA.,
MEETING DATE: February 23, 1988
SUBJECT: Planning Commission ofvthe Codeaof Virgknia,eastAmended
in Accordance with § 15.1 456
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
§ 15.1-456 of the Code of haracteristicsO a d exten dof p blic
that the general location, c
areas, buildings, or structures be submitted tolnhaccordance
Commission for its approval as being substantially
with the adopted Compreheiewed the acquisitiontofoat511779 a ~re
the Planning Commission rev
tract from the Lewis-GagtaBiond at itspJa nary 26, 1988 public
of the Back Creek Fire
hearing.
Attached is a resolution adopted by the Planning Commissiof
expressing its approval of the purchase and the compatibility
the location with the intent of the ComP`ap arelattached as
preliminary concept plan, survey and vicinity
well.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the Board of Supervisors accept this resolution
of approval from the Planning Commission.
APPROVED:
SUBMITTED BY:
~ ~ ~~
~~ `~''' Elmer C. Hodge, Jr.
~, r
Rob Sta zer County Administrator
Director of Planning
--------------------
------------- VOTE
ACTION No yes Abs
Approved ( ) Motion by: Garrett
Denied ( ) Johnson
Received ( ) McGraw
Referred Nickens
To Robers
__.--
-1- _
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE CO1988 ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 2,
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, Section 15.1-456 of the Code of Virginia of 1950,
as amended, requires Planning Commission review of the location,
characteristics, and extent of public areas, buildings, or
structures for compatibility with the Comprehensive Plan; and
WHEREAS, the County of Roanoke currently desires to
purchase a 5.1779 acre tract near the intersection of Routes 694 and
221 in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District in order to construct
a fire station; and
WHEREAS, Volume IV of the Roanoke County Comprehensive
Development Plan, Chapter IV, The Plan for Fire and Rescue
Facilities, identifies the need for a fire station in the Back Creek
Community Planning AreeSbonse to emergencyccalls;nand five minute
minimum travel time in P
WHEREAS, the 5.1779 acre tract is appropriately located in
the Back Creek Community Planning Area in order to enhance response
time in an emergency.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RErovalDoftthe acquRsition ofuthe
Planning Commission recommends app
5.1779 acre tract in order to construct a fire station.
FURTHER, the Roanoke County Planning Commission is
appreciative of the opportunity to review this acquisition.
On motion of Donald Witt, and the following recorded vote:
AYES: Jones, Flippen, Witt, Winstead
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Gordon
Dale Castellow, Alternate Secretary
Roanoke County Planning Commission
_____________________T~ c~
___________ F,
r____
~ ^_
-' ~~
~~
i~
' ----- ~® - I~
I ~, _ ~
I J '~_ ~;
u
.J
i~
~ ` '
e " • ~,.~~
l ~ y ^ ~ _a
~ ~ O ~
i
~-~ 7 .,. ~ ..~~.
i
~~' to J
'' ~___J ~
1 ---I
- - -----
a o
a
¢ •m
oW
o,
J u
- 2 -
r
w N p N
s
Z_
3
a
0
J
Q
7
r
a
w
U
Z
O
U
"' ° y
gym m
< m o w
z i o
~ 3c? ¢
~aa,na
a c~ rc w a
o u,oo a
z
0
Y J
W ~
W m
~r
U ~
Y W
U W
o Q N
m
a _°_ U
w
J
m
~~ a
o~
a
0
i
d
Hz
W
F- F
~ a
o W
U ~
W V.
Y Z
O ~
Q W
O W
~ Z
C7
Z
W
', cES Miu
-firp i`~' ESTATES
w s
~~ ` 691 ~ F ~ ~
~/
~ ... `,
,4 ,__
;® ~~
.. .'. • ...... a•.. ~ \ \•9pe
KJNGS PQNEST \~
I~
• I `....-.~. i
~- VICINITY MAP
- 3 -
~- 8
D
unoru
~. ~ ~. ~ ~~
ROANOKE COUNTY Qack Creek Fire Station
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT Section 15.1-456 Review
A-22388-7.i
ITEM NUMBER ~~
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
IN ROANOKE, VA., ON TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 23, 1988
MEETING DATE: February 23, 1988
SUBJECT: Close Out of the Grant from the Virginia Division of
Historic Landmarks of the Department of Conservation
and Historic Resources for the Roof Replacement on the
Old Roanoke County Courthouse
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
()V
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The project has now been completed for the roof repairs to
the old Roanoke County Courthouse, which was funded by a grant
through the Virginia Division of Historic Landmarks of the
Department of Conservation and Historic Resources. The repair
work, which included the replacement of the roof materials, was
performed by General Preservation Corporation of Worthington,
Ohio. The work has been accepted and the transfer of the title
to the Courthouse has been completed with Roanoke College.
In order to formally close this grant project, the Board of
Supervisors needs to appropriate the $100,000 grant from the
State to the above referenced project. Staff will then forward
all of the necessary documentation to the State to close this
file.
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is no fiscal impact.
sufficient to cover the costs.
RECOMMENDATION:
Funds from
the grant were
Staff requests permission to proceed with the closing of
this grant and authorize the County Administrator to complete any
necessary documentation and accounting transactions.
~~~
SUBMITTED BY:
~ohn M. Chambliss, Jr.
Assistant County Administrator
APPROVED:
Elme C. Hodge
County Administrator
----------------------------------
ACTION VOTE
Approved (X) Motion by: Lee Garrett/Richard No Yes Abs
Robers Garrett x
Denied ( ) x
Received ( ) Johnson
McGraw x
Referred x
Nickens
To x
Robers
JMC/cw
cc: Diane Hyatt
John Chambliss
File
~/
ITEM NUMBER
AT A REGULAR MEETING OTHEHROANOKE oOUNTYEADMINISTRATIONNOENTER
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT
IN ROANOKE, VA., ON TUESDAY,
MEETING DATE: February 23, 1988
SUBJECT: Accounts Paid - January 1988
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
Payments to Vendors:
Payroll: 122%88 $368,365.22
$1,475,916.41
718,976.62
2.194.893.03
A detailed listing of the payments is on file with the Clerk
to the Board of Supervisors.
APPROVED:
SUBMITTED BY:
/~ ~ ~~~~
1U~"'~'~~ Elmer C. Hodge
Diane D. Hyatt County Administrator
Director of Finance
VOTE
------------------
ACTION No Yes Abs
Approved ( ) Motion by: Garrett
Denied ( > Johnson
Received ( ) McGraw
Referred Nickens
To Robers
~- ,-~:..
COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA
RESERVE FOR BOARD CONTINGENCY
Original Budget at July 1, 1987
August 18, 1987 Regional Air
(Approved Administratively)
October 13, 1987 Ualle
YPointe Project - Binder
for Land purchase
November 17 , 1987
Land Acquisition Monies No Longer
Needed to be Appropriated
November 17, 1987 Purchase of 2 Vehicles
December 9, 1987 Purchase of Microwave
(Approved Administratively)
February 9, 1988 Restoration of Courthouse Portraits
Balance as of February 9, 1988
S(u~brni. tted by
Diane D, Hyatt v
Director of Finance
$13,942
(3,772)
(1,000)
49,390
(19,233)
(244)
(8,350)
30 733
~; - 3
COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA
UNAPPROPRIATED BALANCE - GENERAL FUND
Unaudited Amount at July 1, 1987 $1,010,687
June 23, 1987 ~ditional Revenues from Septic Tank Fees 29,000
July 14, 1987 Reappropriate Revenues from Sale of (25,000)
Courthouse (Memo: An Additional
$150,000 for Sale of Land is budgeted
as General Fund Revenues, but will not
be Realized by General Fund) (42,793)*
July 28, 1987 Revise Budget for Victim/Witness Grant (1,000)
August 11, 1987 Storm Sewer Construction - Ogden Road (10,200)
*August 25, 1987 Sale of Mountain View Technological Park
Tract Reclassified to Capital Fund (107,207)
October 27, 1987 Completion of Starkey Park (67,010)
December 1, 1987 Valleypointe (198,937)
December 15, 1987 Excess Revenues over Expenditures as
Presented in the Audit Report for the
Year Ended June 30, 1987 1,052,806
January 12, 1988 Acquisition of Ida Mae Holland Estate (260,000)
Balance as of February 9, 1988 $1,380,346
The recommended level for fund balance for 1987-88 is $1,597,756, which
is 3 percent of the total General Fund budget.
Submitted by
~.c,am.Q.., ~• ~~-
Diane D. Hyatt
Director of Finance
1 - '7'
CpUNTy pF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA
CAPITAL FUND - UNAPPROPRIATED ~
Beginning Balance at July 1, 1987
July 14, 1987 Sale of Courthouse Revenue~a ec~asified
from General Fund to Cap
Sale of Mountain View Technological Park
August 25, 1987
Tract
October 13, 1987 Net Proceeds from VD(7T for Easement in
Front of Vinton Library
Balance as of February 9, 1988
Sul~nitted (by
,~,C.,Q„~.A._, ~...J . ~~
Diane D. Hyatt a
Director of Finance
$ -0-
25,000
107,207
6,180
--
13~8~387
ITEM NUMBER
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: February 23, 1988
SUBJECT: Statement of the Treasurer's Accountability per Investments and
Portfolio Policy, as of January 31, 1988.
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
Dominion Concentration
Sovran Savings
Southwest Virginia Savings & Loan - CD
Dominion Bank - RA
Signet Bank - BA
Sovran Bank - Government Fund
SUBMITTED BY:
/~
,>
~~`fed C. Anderson
f County Treasurer
3,975,944.50
54,096.78
100,000.00
1,500,000.00
1,978,265.28
100,000.00
APPROVED BY:
~'~'
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -VOTE - - - - - - - -
ACTION
Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs
Denied ( )
Received ( )
Referred
To
Brittle _
Garret
Johnson
McGraw
Nickens
~-
COUNTY OF ROANOKE
STATEMENT OF EXPENDITURES
SEVEN MONTHS ENUEU JANUARY 31, 1988
HEALTH & SOCIAL SERVICES
PUBLIC HEALTH
1 387,016 290,262
75
PUBLIC ASSISTANCE 1,728,545 948,597 55
INSTITUTIONAL CARE 826,406 398,836 48
j } SOCIAL SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS 48,000 7,018 15
j 94,984 64,988 68
' DEVELOPMENT
SUPERINTENDENT OF DEVELOPMENT
PLANNING & ZONING 111,057 64,853 S8
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 271,759 119,069 44
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 89.673 60,959 68
PLANNING COMMISSION 104,565 60,842 58
CONSTRUCTION BUILDING SERVICES 18'260 9,255 51
i 200,280 111,346 56
NON-DEPARTMENTAL
~~
~ LIBRARY
EXTENSION & CONTINUING EDUCATION
r 1,084,511 601,380 55
. EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 95'293 25,799 27
CONTRIBUTIONS TO SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS 754,349 469,062 62
MISCELLANEOUS 20,000 19,187 96
556,120
--- 62,978 I1
TOTAL ---------
- ___
----'-" --- ______ _
24,251,991 12,948,923 53
TRANSFERS AND RESERVES
t REIMBURSABLE EXPENDITURES
~ TRANSFER TO DEBT SERVICE 0 1,482
TRANSFER TO INTERNAL SERVICE 3,775,690 0 0
TRANSFER TO SCHOOL OPERATING FUND 254,469
25
466
000 127,441 50
TRANSFER TO UTILITY CAPITAL ,
, 6,838,198 27
TRANSFER TO CAPITAL PROJECTS 235,717 0 0
TRANSFER TO YOUTH HAVEN 2,441,981 0 0
TRANSFER TO GRANT FUND 72,239 0 U
UNAPPROPRIATED BALANCE 35 O 0
711,535 O O
TOTAL TRANSFER ITEMS ------------
32,957,666 6
--
,967
121 ------
__-~~-
,
GRAND TOTAL S 57,209,657 S 19,916
044
t , 35
Financial Statements: Page 3 of 3
O~ ROANp,Y~
z ~
~~ :~ 'a?~
~$ E50 $8
SFSQU-CENTENN~A`'
A Beautiful Beginning
JOHN M. CHAMBLISS. JR.
ASSISTANT COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
~TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Board of Supervisors
John M. Chambliss, Jr. ~''""""
for ~fana ement Services
Assistant Administra , g
February 19, 1988
Status of the Starkey Road Improvement Project
As you are probably aware, the County has requested that the
State Department of 'transportation determine if the monies, which
would have been required to purchase additional right of way to
allow sloping and ditching, could be used instead to pay towards
the cost of curbing and guttering as proposed in the project. To
date we have not received official notification from the State to
this inquiry.
You may recall that staff met with adjacent property owners in
November concerning cost sharing to pay for the curb and gutter
improvements along this project, which had been estimated at a
cost of $72,300. Many of the adjacent property owners indicated
that they would be willing to share in the cost of these
improvements, however others asked the County to see if the State
would pay any additional share of the cost before assessments
were made. Staff is currently working on a policy document for
consideration by the Board of Supervisors, which would allow the
cost of such public works improvements to be equitably shared by
the benefiting property owners through special assessments or
special tax districts. Such a policy would work not only in the
case or the Starkey Road improvements, but towards any other
similar project for street curbing, street lights, drainage,
water and sewer improvements, etc., which have a benefit to a
particular area rather than the County overall.
As information is received from the State and the policy document
is finalized for your consideration, we will forward additional
iriformaLion to you .
Thank you.
JMC/cw
cc: Phillip Henry
Paul Mahoney
Elmer Hodge
Cnuuntg of ~Rattnn~e
` ~` l
MANAGEMENT SERVICES
P.Q. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 2 4018-07 9 8 (703) 772-2002
~ - ,~
ITEM ~-8~
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
IN ROANOKE, VA., ON TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 23, 1988
MEETING DATE: February 23, 1988
SUBJECT: Public Hearing and Consideration of an Ordinance
Amending Section 21-73 of the Roanoke County Code,
"Exemption for Elderly and Disabled Persons," and
Re-enacting Same to Increase the Total Combined Income
and Total Combined Net Worth Provisions
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
At the January 26 meeting of the Board of Supervisors, it
was suggested that the total combined income provision for all
taxpayers of the above referenced ordinance be increased from
$18,000 to $22,000 and that the net worth provision be increased
from $65,000 to $75,000. The attached ordinance as prepared by
the County Attorney serves this purpose and makes the provisions
effective for the 1988 tax year.
FISCAL IMPACT:
During the 1987 tax year,
th $269,274 tax credit was allowed by
e County of Roanoke to its citizens who qualified under the
provisions of this section of the County Code and the net impact
of this change for both the current fiscal year and also the
subsequent fiscal year is
$10
000)
sin
th deemed to be minimal ($2,000 -
,
,
ce
e exemption. applies to the
over th
b increment in taxes
e
ase year.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the public hearing for citizen input
be held and the second reading of the ordinance be approved so
that the benefits will be effective for the 1988 tax year.
SUBMITTED BY:
John M. Chamblis Jr.
Assistant County Administrator
APPROVED:
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
--- ti
Approved
Denied
Received
Referred
To
Motion by:
ACTION
VOTE
No Yes Abs
Garrett
Johnson
McGraw
Nickens
Robers
JMC/cw
cc: Wayne Compton
Paul Mahoney
Attachment
ITEM NUMBER.Z~~
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: February 23, 1988
SUBJECT: Petition of Brambleton Medical Associates to amend the
Roanoke County Land Use Plan and to rezone property located at
3142 Brambleton Avenue in the Cave Spring Magisterial District.
COUNTY /A'DMINISTRATOR' S COMMENTS: / v _ iii
~'~J] ~ / //'~ /
~-x! ,s ~" ,..r2 -C.~ c.z~2 ~.,~d~.- ~~/~~v/
~~~ ~
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: ~~~ ~C~ a
These petitions were originally scheduled to be heard on January
26, 1988. They were continued until the February 23th meeting.
The Land Use Plan amendment requests a redesignation from
Neighborhood Conservation to the Transition land use category.
The rezoning petition requests a change from R-1, Residential to
B-1, Business to construct a parking lot intended to serve the
existing businesses, and a proposed addition.
At the January meeting, it was noted that the petitioners were
potentially in violation of the zoning setback regulations. This
information was verified and the petitioners were issued a notice
of Violation on February 18. Adjudication of the zoning
violation is an administrative responsibility. Determination of
the Land Use Plan amendment and rezoning request is a separate
legislative matter.
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning Commission recommended approval of the Land Use Plan
amendment and the rezoning with proffered conditions. The staff
recommends that these two items be considered concurrently.
~'
SUBMITTED BY:
~~
Rob Stalzer, Director
Planning
APPROVED BY:
~~~..~
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
ACTION VOTE
Approved ( > Motion by: No Yes Al
Denied ( ) Garrett _
Received ( ) Johnson _
Referred McGraw _
To Nickens _
Robers
238-- /
PETITIONIIt: BRAMBLETON M®ICAL ASSOCL?~TES
CASE N~IDER: 43-11/87
Planning C~cnission Hearing Date: November 5, 1987
Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: January 26, 1988
1. QUEST V
' ion of Brambleton Medical Associates io48 nd e tra°tnfrom Neighbo hood
Petit desi nation of a
Plan: Future Land Use map located immediately south of 3142 Brambleton Avenue
Conservation to Transition,
in the Cave Spring Magisterial District.
2. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION Co~mlission
residents voiced the following concerns at the Planning
Neighboring est conflicts with the future land use map designation
public Hearing: the requ tential devaluation of property.
and violates established land use principles; Po
3, SIGNIFICANT IMPACT FACIbRS
a, None.
4, PROFFERED CONDITIONS
a, Not applicable.
5, p0NYtZISSIONER'S MdPION, VOTE AND REASON
Mr. Witt moved to approve the petition.
roll call vote:
The nation carried with the following
py~; Flippen, Witt, Gordon
~yS; Jones, Winstead
pgS~T; None
6, DISSENTING PERSPDC'PIVE
a,- None given.
7 , ATTACEiMEN'I'S
Concept Plan (8~" x 11")
Vicinity Map (8}" x 11")
~ Staff Report
Other:
Robert Sta zer, Planning Commission Secretary
z ~ ~~ ~
STAFF REPORT
CASE NUMBER: 43-11/87 PETITIONER: BRAMBLETON MEDICAL ASSOC.
REVIEWED BY: ROB STALZER DATE: OCTOBER 27, 1987
Petition of Brambleton Medical Associates to amend the Roanoke County
Land Use Plan: Future Land Use map designation of a 1.48 acre tract
from Neighborhood Conservation to Transition, located immediately south
of 3142 Brambleton Avenue in the Cave Spring Magisterial District.
1. NATURE OF REQUEST
a. Request to amend the Future Land Use Plan Map from Neighborhood
Conservation to Transition.
2. PERMITTED LAND USE TYPES
a. Existing: Neighborhood Conservation encourages single family
attached and detached housing, neighborhood activity centers.
b. Proposed: Transition permits office and institutional uses,
retail uses, multifamily residential uses, single family
attached uses, and parks.
3. PLAN CONSISTENCY
a. Current designation: Neighborhood Conservation.
b. Appropriate designation for proposed use: Transition.
c. Analysis: Office use is not permitted within a Neighborhood
Conservation area. The petitioner has proposed to amend the
land use plan map to Transition. The justification offered is
as follows: highway frontage of office complex and direct
access to Brambleton Avenue; slope and orientation of property
towards Brambleton Avenue; business zoning of adjacent
properties; existence of the urban services; and presence of
existing office development.
4. STAFF EVALUATION
a. Strengths: (1) Land use determinants of highway frontage, land
use pattern, existing zoning, surrounding land use, topography,
and urban sector are in existence.
b. Weaknesses: (1> Some land use types that are desirable within
Transition land use areas such as retail uses and high density
multifamily residential uses are not appropriate on this site.
-2-
'~ C.~ GT -
PETITIONER: E~RANISLE`DpN MIDICAL ASSOCIATES
CASE N[P'IBER: 44-11/87
Planning Cam~ission Hearing Date: November 5,-1987/ December 1, 1987
Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: January 26, 1988
1. RD~UFST
Petition of Brambleton Medical Associates to rezone a 1.48 acre tract from R-l,
Residential to B-1, Business to construct a parking lot, located immediately
south of 3142 Brambleton Avenue in the Cave Spring Magisterial District.
2. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION
Four. residents voiced the following concerns: the type of structure that could
be placed on the property; residential properties will become more exposed to
Brambleton Avenue; devaluation of~residential property; the type of lighting to
be used.
3. SIGNIFICANT IMPACT FACERS
a. Comprehensive Plan: 1985 Comprehensive Develognent Plan has placed this area
within a Neighborhood Conservation land use category. The proposed use is
inconsistent with the land use plan policies and map. Appropriate
designation for proposed land use is Transition. Note accompanying land use
plan amendment reguest for a Transition designation.
4. PROFFERED CONDITIONS
a. Cut only such trees ,as necessary on the tract to be rezoned for the
construction and maintenance of parking.
b. Concept plan dated 11/25/87 stating proposed use for a parking lot.
c. Lighting will be directed toward the interior of the property and not exceed
14 feet in height.
5. O~NYKISSIONER'S MOTION, WTE AND REASON
Mr. Witt moved to approve the petition with proffered conditions. The motion
carried with the following roll call vote:
AYES: Flippen, Witt, Gordon, Jones, Winstead
NAYS: None
ABSENT: None
6. DISSENTING PERSPDCTIVE
a. None.
7. ATTACHMENTS
.~ Concept Plan (8~" x 11")
/ Vicinity Map (8}" x 11")
~ Staff Report
Other:
Robert Starzer, Planning Cccnr~issio~~ Secretary
..~.8_~
D
NnQru
.. „.....
"_ ~* _ _ 3
- -
a" `' ROANOKE COUNTY
= Brambleton Medical Associates
~ := DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT R-1 to B-1
~8 ~ i
STAFF REPORT
CASE NUMBER: 44-11/87 PETITIONER: BRAMBLETON MEDICAL ASSOC.
REVIEWED BY: ROB STALZER~~ DATE: OCTOBER 27, 1987
UPDATED: JANUARY 6, 1988
Petition of Brambleton Medical Associates to rezone a 1.48 acre tract
from R-1, Residential to B-l, Business to construct a parking lot,
located immediately south of 3142 Brambleton Avenue in the Cave Spring
Magisterial District.
1. NATURE OF REQUEST
a. Petition amended on November 24, 1987. Amended conditional
request to rezone the property for the purpose of constructing a
parking lot consisting of 42 spaces. If constructed, the
parking lot will serve an existing office complex that is
accessed by way of Brambleton Avenue. Subject tract has been
owned by petitioners for ten years.
b. Concept plan and zoning vicinity map describe project more
fully.
2. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS
a. B-1 zoning district permits a variety of office uses as well as
higher density residential development. Petitioner has secured
the proposed parking lot use by attaching proffered conditions
to the rezoning.
b. Site plan review required to insure compliance with County
regulations.
c. VDOT entrance permit required.
3. SITE CHARACTERISTICS
a. Topography: Moderate slope towards Brambleton Avenue.
b. Ground Cover: Heavily wooded with mature tree cover.
4. AREA CHARACTERISTICS
a. Future Growth Priority: Situated within the Cave Spring
Community Planning Area. Designated for stable future growth,
urban services available, commercial infill encouraged.
b. General area is densely developed with a mix of residential and
commercial uses. Property adjoins established single family
residential subdivision and existing professional office
complex.
5. LAND USE IMPACT ASSESSMENT
Rating: Rate each factor according to the impact of the proposed
action. Use a scale of 1 through 5.
1 = positive impact, 2 = negligible impact, 3 = manageable impact,
4 = disruptive impact, 5 = severe impact, and N/A = not applicable.
- 4 -
z ~-~
RATING FACTOR COMMENTS
LAND USE COMPATIBILITY
5 a. Comprehensive Plan: 1985 Comprehensive Development Plan has
placed this area within a Neighborhood Conservation land use
category. The proposed use is inconsistent with the land use
plan policies and map. Appropriate designation for proposed
land use is Transition. Note accompanying land use plan
amendment request for a Transition designation.
3 b. Surrounding Land: Proposed development immediately adjoins
established single family subdivision. The 50 foot wide strip
zoned R-l, running along the entire easterly portion of the
petitioner's property and bordering the subdivision will be left
undisturbed.
3 c. Neighboring Area: Existing residential subdivision, office
complex, and dense commercial development.
2 d. Site Layout: Access is from Brambleton Avenue, traffic will not
affect neighboring residential area. Proffer offered to protect
existing tree cover.
N/A e. Architecture:
3 f. Screening and Landscape: As per ordinance. Proffer offered to
protect existing tree cover as is possible.
3 g. Amenities: Proffer that lighting fixtures will not exceed 14
feet in height and will be directed away from residential
properties.
3 h. Natural Features: Existing slope and heavy tree cover.
TRAFFIC
2 i. Street Capacities: Improvements to Brambleton Avenue almost
complete. Project will not generate any additional traffic.
However, parking lot will accommodate anticipated needs arising
from proposed expansion of existing office building.
2 j. Circulation: Adequate circulation as shown on concept plan.
Engineering requests roads to be at least 24 feet wide. The
project would use existing access road.
UTILITIES
2 k. Water: Adequate source and distribution.
2 1. Sewer: Adequate treatment and transmission.
DRAINAGE
2 m. Basin: No problems noted. Drainage will be accommodated by
Brambleton Avenue improvements.
N/A n. Floodplain:
- 5 -
,z ~~ ~W
PUBLIC SERVICES
2 0. Fire Protection: Within established service standard.
2 p. Rescue: Within established service standard.
N/A q. Parks and Recreation:
N/A r. School:
TAX BASE
1 s. - Land and Improvement Value: Land is currently owned by
petitioners. Value of proposed parking lot is unknown at this
time. Parking lot expansion will support existing businesses.
- Taxable Gross Sales/Year: Not applicable.
- Total Employees: Not applicable.
- Total revenue to the County/Year: Not applicable.
ENVIRONMENT
2 t. Air:
2 u. Water:
2 v. Soils:
2 w. Noise:
2 x. Signage: Not specified; however, it is not anticipated that
additional Signage will be needed or installed.
6. PLAN CONSISTENCY
This area is designated as Neighborhood Conservation. The proposed
office use is not consistent with either the plan policies or map.
The appropriate designation for the proposed use is Transition.
7. STAFF EVALUATION
a. Strengths: (1) Proposal complies with shared access, shared
parking, and limits the frequency of driveway openings. (2)
Quality of highway frontage development will not be diminished.
(3) Specific use and concept plan has been proffered.
b. Weaknesses: (1) Proposed map amendment would be in conflict
with Neighborhood Conservation land use designation. Rezoning
approval should only follow the amendment of the Land Use Plan
Map to the Transition land use category.
-6-
~ ~-~ - /
BRAMBLETON MEDICAL ASSOCIATES
Tax Map Numbers
Part of Lot 12 77.10-2-11
Part of Lot 13 77.10-2-12
Part of Lot 14 77.10-2-13
Part of Lot 15 77.10-2-14
1 ~i ~; _v~
AA o A y '
~~~ O ~a~~ I i i o` ~ ~~ ~~ i
~ ~ ~ ~n m a ! :S ~ , ~ 'g~y~ i9l
2~3m yn my } ! n ~ ,
6m0~. ~iAmd ~ ~ .~Z~'
oo~ m
Np n
a03 2 n ~ ~
m
n 0 ~ ~ ~ iZGWf Ril I
k ~ I s .o.. ao~E a. A w~.c '.
_7,e .- -~ ~ ~,
~ / ,_-'
;/ g _
;~ ~
~ ,~,
;~; ~ I ~
,~ i i~il; ~'~
/ I '~ ~ ~e I
~ 1 ~' ~~~ -l ~ I i . ~ ~8 ~ ~ G
/1 I ~MCE;O 'E~~I I
~, / III / 1 \ ~ \\
N ~ / I \ A D!
~ ,, .~
0~ of^~~ I\
~' A~6` eY ~~!! ~~
tips n "~l / ~` \\0 ~ 0.~ ~ u~F N I `+l
---~_' ~~' ~Y~ ~1'~~ ~\ ~ Rig ~' 0
~~, ~ 'rte ~ -~ _ m I
N., ~ w . ~, A ~'~ ~ O
~~ ~ r
,l~,am. /~~I ~' ~ ~°~~~ '~ f
„lC o-, ~ ~
/ ~: ~d ~ /
/' / (~'}~//ply I / ~ /
'',,/// .,yr ~' o ,~ ~ //
S \~ `\ 1 '~---': ~' ~ _- ' '" ti~ 'yarrJ ~- // Off'
,, ,
/ / I
~~ ~/~ ~~ez ~"~
~ /
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ CONCEPT PC.AN ¢~~ ~~~ ~~ ? •~.
3 \ E- R~o~ j -
BRAMBCEjbrV MEO/CAC AS~R~,C ~ s ~
m
.~
~ ~ p ~ o° ~ A z ~ A `f75N/P ~~I :i~ i i ~ SIL~• ~ f~ ?
O \ ~ ~ ~ h Ra4/.pKE coC/,v~'Y V/RG/NI.G ; ~ ~ •~ ^c~~Ee .+~"`
'-~
VIRGINIA:
BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY
A portion of Lots 12, 13, 14
and 15, Map of Richards Heights,
generally located at the rear
of 3142 Brambleton Avenue,
S.W., within the Cave Spring
Magisterial District, and
recorded as parcel #see attached
in the Roanoke County Tax
1
FINAL ORDER
xecoras. ~
TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY:
WHEREAS, your Petitioner, Brambleton Medical
Associates, did petition 'the Board of County Supervisors to
rezone the above referenced parcel of land from R-1
District to B-1 District for the purpose of construction of
a parking area for an existing family practice medical and
health care facility; and
WHEREAS, after due legal notice, the Planning
Commission did hold a public hearing of the petition on
December 1, 1987, at which time, all parties in interest
were given an opportunity to be heard; and
WHEREAS, after full consideration, the Board of
County Supervisors determined that the rezoning be denied.
on February 23, 5988.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE ORDERED that the
aforementioned parcel land, which is contained in the
Roanoke County Tax Maps as Parcel No. (See attached), and
recorded in Deed Bool: 1027, at Page 1, and legally
described below, be rezoned from R- District to B-1
District.
Legal Description of Pr erty:
Being all of Lots 12, 13, 14 and 15,
Map of Richards Heig s, said map being
of record in the Cle k's Office of the
Circuit Court for t e County of
Roanoke, Virginia, n Plat Book 1, at
page 328.
LESS and EXCEPTIN a strip of land 50
feet in width ru ing across the entire
easterly border f lots 12, 13, 14 and
15, said strip eing adjacent to Lots 3
and 4, Section , Greenwood Forest.
Tliis rezoning ~s subject to the following
conditions:
1. Petitior~er shall cut only those trees on the
tract rezoned as ar necessary for construction and
maintenance of the parking facility.
2. Peti inner will construct the parking facility
in substantial c mpliance with the site plan presented to
the Planning Commission on December 1, 1987.
3. y lighting installed will be directed toward
the interior of the parking facility and will not exceed
fourteen (1 ) feet in height.
B IT FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this order be
transmitt d to the Secretary of the Planning Commission and
thafi he e directed to reflect that change on the official
zoning map of Roanoke County.
z 8~
ADOPTED on motion of Supervisor Robers
and upon the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens,
Garrett
NAYS: None
ABSENT: '
~~• Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
CC: Rob Stalzer, Director of Planning
John Willey, Real Estate Assessments
Arnold Covey, Development Review Director
~~IRGINIA:
F,~F`j~~' ~~CTF' l_iJAF.;~~ ~F• ~I~~'EF~V,SOBS O?, unA::Or:~' ,-„rT.~.ry
A 1.481 acre parcel 0f lar_ey, )
+enera,?y 1c~cG:tec ~..t thy, ~ea, ;
c~.`. ,?242 ?3ra.:`,,,~:~ ~~,-.~,,
S . W. , wi tl':ir: t:.e Cave Spring ) FII~'AL ORDER
Magisterial Distric*., ar:d )
recorded as parcel # see attached )
in the Roanoke County Tax )
Records.
TO THE HONORABLE STIPERVISORS OF ROANOY.E COUNTY:
WY,EREAS, your r'et'.t1C~r:eX', Brambletor. ?~Tedic~al
Associates, did petition the Board i~f Cov.I:ty Supervisors to
redesigr:ate the above referenced parce.I of land .from
Neighborhood Conservation to Transit:icm; and
WHEF.EP.S, after due legal r:otic:e, the Planning
Commissio:: did hold a public h,earirg of the petition on
November 5 _ , y_87 ~ a ~ r ~ ~ P r: in e e t
at w_ .. c.l~ n- s
were giver. ar. opportuTlity to be heard; and
WI•IEREAS, after full COr!Siderc~,tl0r:, '."~;r' FOard Of
County Supervisors determined that tl.e redesi~:~a'_e:, be
denied. on February 23, 1988. ,
?`TOW, jLrEREPORF nF T•^ -~R?~Fn_n .,. _.t +,...`
afore~r.etltioned p:~rr_el of land, whi~.h is c0ntai.:_d ir. the
RC1ar:0i~e CC~L1r!ty Tc:4:. Maps ~zS-. Pc=~:'CE'.1 '\T<l . ~ `_i E, t` cat tciC'L:P.d) , a:'ld
recorded i.: ;fiend ?300;; 10 ^_ 7 , a t Page r' : , a_zcl 1 ega 11 y
- 3 -
~ • Imo../ ~ V
~(-'.:C'r1~+E'd tr~,.1C)W, i7E I'ed6.S'?CTl:~',-ed ~..~):., "'~~ +~.~" E7. -i~t
E-t~??'~t-'r~;~a't7011 tC Try:;S~1.1~~.. ._: r~?F' ?~':7t'.~P ~ ~:7C' Tlcr/ (?. :t~E?,
i:E'CJ%~ 1 r)eSC; l:t .i:1.": Of Uy ~")E:'r±~~
j 1
A strap <~` land 45' in width ru>>:li:~,
,)aral lel to the southeaster :;y k)ou~zdary
of Riche^~3s T-?eirti:ts and acr„^~= t'_,e
`~Ciltttl°c;: t ~~.. ' j~ ~: ~ l: .C)L, C+f T pt,, 7 , c: , Q
10 a.nd 11 , Richards ?ieights , togetht'r
with all of Lots 12, 13, 14 and 15,
Richards ?ieights, said plat being of
record ir: Plat Book 1, at Page 328, in
the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court
of Roanoke County, Virginia.
BE IT FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this order be
transmitted to the Secretary of t..e Pl~inr_ing Commission ar:d
that he be directed to reflect that change on the official
^uture Land Use Guide of Roar:oke Cou:lty.
ADOPTED on motion of SuperviE3_ Robers
ar:d upon the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garret
NAYS: None
ABSENT:
`~l ~ ~_ Q-«?-,1~ C l e r k
Rca„t,);~ Cour.tZf Board of supervisors
CC: Rob Stalzer, Director of Planning
John Willey, Real Estate Assessments
Arnold Covey, Director of Development Review
VIRGINIA:
BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY
p, portion of Lots 12, 13, 14 )
and 15, Map of Richards Heights, )
generally located at the rear )
)
of 3142 Brambleton Avenue,
AMENDED PETITION
S.W., within the Cave Spring )
Magisterial District, and )
recorded as parcel #see attached )
in the Roanoke County '"aY )
)
Records.
TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY:
WHEREAS, your Petitioner, Brambleton Medical
Associates, respectfully files this petition pursuant to
Section 21-105 of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance and
in accordance with the Code of Virginia of 1950, as
amended, and would respectfully show the following:
1) The Petitioner is the owner of the above
referenced parcel of land.
2) The property is presently zoned under the
provisions of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance as R-1
District.
3) The property is designated transition in the
Future Land Use Guide cif the Roanoke County Comprehensive
Development Plan.
:~ ~ `~'~,ur De±:;±;c,r~er :.ow desire°, +c, nave this
s , - _ _ -'
property rezoned as B--1 District for the 1?urpose cif
constructing a parking facility for a family practice
medical and health care facility.
WHEREFORE, your Petitioner respectfully requests
that the Zoning Ordinance of Roanoke County be amended and
that the above referenced parcel of land be rezoned as set
out in number 4.
FURTHER, your Petitoner requests that this
petition be referred to the Secretary to the Roanoke County
Planning Commission for its consideration and
recommendation.
Respectfully submitted,
BRAMB T EDICAL S OCIA~S
BY
Petitoner
`~ r,
J hn T. lum III
3 8 Second St t, S.W.
Roanoke, Virginia 24011
Counsel for Petitioner
BRAMBLETON MEDICAL ASSOCIATES
Tax Map Numbers
Part of Lot 12 77.10-2-11
Part of Lot 13 77.10-2-12
Part of Lot 14 77.10-2-13
Part of Lot 15 77.10-2-14
Vi F:GINIA
:~ ~o aF .o::,,,,,_T: ~.~avrY
A I .481 acre pa r'.ec-- 'i-` -,-•-- , i
Jen,•rally .'_c,c'~ ter c': ~:: ~_•~. _ ;~ ~
of 314 ?-. ?~. ?mL,'_P*~,: ~• ,~r•. ~ .
S . W . , wit%i r: t!•:e C~;ve Spr:. n~- ) RECOI~IMENDAT_TOAT
Magisterial District, and ;
recorded as parcel # see attached
in the Roanoke County Ta:~ )
Records .
TO TI?E HONORABuE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE CO~JNTY:
WHEREAS, 1-oL:r oatitiorer, Brambleton Medical
Associates, has fi.le~i with the Secretary to the Plai:ninr
Commission a petitior~ t,~ redesigr:ate the above referenced
parcel of l:~nd from Neighborhood Conservation to
Transition; and
WHEREAS, the petition was referred to the Planning
Commissior. which, after due legal notice as required by
Sectio;;_15.1-4:1 of the_Code of Virginia of 1950, as
amended, did hold G public hearing or. November 5 , 19 $~; and
4dHFREAS, ~~t ±}:~,t ablic. r:earinq all r~arties ir:
interest were afforded an opportunity to be heard; and
WHEF.EA~, tr:e Plar._:ir:c~ Commissior:, after due
J
consideration has recommended to the Board of Comity
~.~L1r~E'T'V.1SC~2'~ ~t1at tI":E' Fl1tU2'e Land I~~E' :'lcir! ti~~ ai)lE:":C~C-'C~ tC! t~"!~~
e::teiit that the ~~bove ~°eFerenced tract be redesi~,natec
Trans i t i car: .
~ :Q : J
~:ommissi~~n ~ ecoin::;e:-:~3s o t~:e Po~rd o` Co~~r.ty S~~p=_~ . _.:v~ s
t?:at the a;)oVE' ~f erenced L~a~ ct~ i of lard k%t• , :..::c? ._ _ `'~'re~y
iS% redesignated 2~ TraI7S?i:lc~:l n t~.e Fut11rE ra:1c' v'SF
~.:u71. Tile c:a~)',~(~ ~.t! ::~U71 Wc;.°; C~;%i%±e~l U1. :ilk%t~(..1Li. r%F
___-~_.-W ~~_ _ __ - ------._----_______ o:: seco_:d by
---- ~-------- ----------------------~ and upon the
following recorded vote:
AYES: } 1.iptt~l~ l~1iTT~ ~to't~~w!
NAYS : So~tE,S~ l~i~sZ'~+lD
ABSENT : 1J.~tt
Respectfu?~y subr.:itted,
~~ ~1-S-Z7
Secreta
Roanol-e County
Planning COMiiiiSSiG:l
VIRGINIA:
BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROADIOHE COLTNTY
A 1.481 acre parcel of land, )
ge::erally located at the rear )
of 3142 Brambleton Avenue, }
S.W., within the Cave Spring ) PETI:'IOAT
g- .~_ ,,.r _ ~
rF>c~nrdad as p~~„rrP 1 #see attached }
in t'.:e Roanoke Coa:~ty Ta== )
R?COrdS. }
TO THE HO?vORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY:
WHEREAS, your Petitioner, Brambletor_P~edical
+'f,,1~ ~~' fil S t iS ^etition '~L'rS•~~nt tC
Associates, respnc _, e h L ~
Section 21-105 of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance and
iri accordance with the Code of Virginia of 195, as
amended, and would respectfully show the follocaing:
i } The Petitioner is the owner ~~f the above
referenced parcel of land.
2) The property is desigr:ated Neigriborhood
Conservation. in the Future Land Use Guide of the Roanoke
Cot:nty Comprehensive Develc~pmert Plan.
3) Your Petitioner now desires to have this
property redesignated as Transition.
WHEREFORE, your Petitioner respectfully requests
`hat the Future Lar_ci Use Guide of noar~uke Caur_ty be amer:ded
and that the above referenced parcel of land be
redesignated as set out in ::umk>er 3.
FURTHER, your Petitaner requests that this
pet itiori he referred by 'she Secr~~ta~ y.c t`:e RoanokF. County
Planning Commission f~~r its consideration ar_d
recommendation:.
Respectful'_y s~:bmitted,
BRAMBLETON MEDICAL ASSOCIATES
r, v- ~ ~, ~ - ----
+~- eta bone
,7'ohn T .' Mc{1 ump T I
308 Seconds` Str t S . v~ .
Roanoke, Virginia ^4011
Counsel fo:~ PetitiorLer
L E G ~A L N O T I C E
Notice is hereby given to all interested persons that the
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at their
evening session beginning at 7:00 p.m. on Tuesday, February 23, 1988, in
the Community Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 3738
Brambleton Avenue, S.W., Roanoke, Virginia, on the petition of Jones and
Jones Associates Architects and Medical Properties Associates to vacate
a portion of a 25 foot right-of-way known as Jones Street from Peters
Creek Road west approximately 170 feet in the Catawba Magisterial
District.
The County Planning Commission recommends approval with
proffered conditions.
A copy of the Zoning Ordinance of Roanoke County and amendments
thereto as well as a copy of the petition, site plan, and other
documents related to this request may be examined in the office of the
Department of Planning and Zoning, located in Room 600 of the Roanoke
County Administration Center.
Roanoke County will provide assistance to handicapped persons
desiring to attend public hearings. Such individuals are requested to
contact the County office of Personnel Services ([703] 772-2018) if
special provisions are necessary for attendance.
Given under my hand this 3rd day of February, 1988.
•/5~` -
Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
Please publish in the evening edition
of the Roanoke Times and World News on:
February 9, 1988
February 16, 1988
Direct the bill for Publication to:
Jones and Jones Associates Architects
2431 Ravenwood Avenue
Roanoke, VA 24019
A p p E A R A N,C E R E Q U E S T
~~C
`~ ~
PUBLIC HEARING ON
I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to
reco nize me during the public hearing on the above matter ~o
g
I ma comment. I agree to follow the guidelines listed
that Y
low. WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND
be
ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD.
1, Each speaker will have bntwasnanhindividualvorminutes it
im
available whether speaks g
representative. The chci~ an will decide the time it
' izens speaking on an issue, anof
based on the number of
will enforce the rule unless instructed by the major y
the Board to do otherwise. oint of
Speakers will be limited to a presentation be entertained by
2' Questions of clarification may
view only.
the Chairman.
All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between
3.
a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowe •all
Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at
4.
times .
Speakers are requested to leave any written statements
5
and/or comments with the cler .
IVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FO IZATIONG FROMETHE GROUPHALL
6, IND
FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHO
ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM.
P L E A S E W R I T E L E G I B L Y
-- d L ~ ~ ~
NAME:
2~
ADDRESS:
PHONE:
out, give to the Deputy
PLEASE NOTE: (Clerk.f1Thank you.)
A p p E A R A N ,C E
R E Q U E S T
~~ ~~ f
PUBLIC HEARING ON
I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to
recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so
that I may comment. I agree to follow the guidelines listed
below. WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND
ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD.
1. Each speaker will have between three and five minutes
available whether speaking as an individual or
representative. The fhcitizenslspeakingeonhantissue,mand
based on the number
will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of
the Board to do otherwise.
2, Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of
view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by
the Chairman.
3, All comments mustker andeaudiencetmembersdis notaallowedeen
a recognized spea
4, Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all
times .
5, Speakers are requested to leave any written statements
and/or comments with the clerk.
(, INDIVIDUALS PURPORTINGITTENPAUTHORIZATIONGFROMETHERGROUPHALL
FILE WITH THE CLERK WR
ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM.
P L E A S E W R I T E L E G I B L Y
NAME:
ADDRESS:
~l
~~
PHONE:
i
t ~ ~ `b L~ ~l w~
PLEASE NOTE: (After filling out, give to the Deputy
Clerk. Thank you.)
A P P E A R A N C E
Ir G M
PUBLIC HEARING ON
R E Q U E S T
~.1 ~Ic u 1
(a~~~~
I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to
recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so
that I may comment. I agree to follow the guidelines listed
below. WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND
ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD.
1, Each speaker will have between three and five minutes
available whether speaking as an individual or
representative. The fh citizenslspeakingeonhantissue,mand
based on the number o the majority of
will enforce the rule unless instructed by
the Board to do otherwise.
2, Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of
view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by
the Chairman.
3, All comments mustker andeaudiencetmembersdis notaallowedeen
a recognized spea
4, Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all
times .
5, Speakers are regWithedheoclerke any written statements
and/or comments
(, INDIVIDUALS PURPORTINGITTENPAUTHORIZATIONGFROMETHERGROUP~LL
FILE WITH THE CLERK WR
ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM.
P L E A S E W R I T E L E G I B L Y
NAME:
ADDRESS:
PHONE
I~ n a .v o
rg ~ ~ i
a~~
PLEASE NOTE: (After filling out, give to the Deputy
Clerk. Thank you.)
p, p p E A RAN C E
' ._ ~ ~ ~ ~
PUBLIC HEARING ON ,F ~-
I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to
recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so
that I may comment. I agree to follow the guidelines listed
below. WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND
ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD.
1. Each speaker will have betwasnanhindividualvorminutes
available whether speaking
representative. The chairman will decide the time limit
based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and
will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of
the Board to do otherwise.
2, Speakers will be limited to a presentation be entertained by
view only. Questions of clarification may
the Chairman.
3, All comments mueaker andeaudiencetmembersdis notaallowedeen
a recognized sp
4, Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all
times .
5, Speakers are requested to leave any written statements
and/or comments with the clerk.
(, INDIVIDUALS PURPORTIWRITTENPAUTHORIZATIONG FROMETHERGROUPHALL
FILE WITH THE CLERK
ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM.
P L E A S E W R I T E L E G I B L Y
;M
NAME: ,f",~{ r
~• -
ADDRESS:
`,
f..
PHONE : ' / ,, '~ .~ % ~,~ C~:_
R E Q U E S T
~ l
PLEASE NOTE: (After filling out, give to the Deputy
Clerk. Thank you.)
p, p P E A R A N.C E R E Q U E S T
PUBLIC HEARING ON ~~~ '~~'
I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to
recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so
that I may comment. I agree to follow the guidelines listed
below. WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND
ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD.
1. Each speaker will have between three and five minutes
available whether speaking as an individual or
representative. The chairman will decide the time limit
based on the number ofunlesseinstructedgbynthe majoritYnof
will enforce the rule
the Board to do otherwise.
2, Speakers will be limited tlarificationtmay be entertained by
view only. Questions of c
the Chairman.
3, All comments musaker andeaudaencetmembersdis notaallowedeen
a recognized spe
4, Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all
times .
5, Speakers are requested to leave any written statements
and/or comments with the clerk.
6, INDIVIDUALS PURPORTINGITTENpAUTKORIZATIONGFROMETHERGROUPHALL
FILE WITH THE CLERK WR
ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM.
P L E A S E W R I T E L E G I B L Y
NAME : !!F -~-~ ~ , a ~
ADDRESS : '~~J ~ ~-~l4'`~_`.~~ ``-`-~ .~ ~"'°> W
,..~~,A
{--, _ ~,
~ t;.~ *~
.~ ~'f ~~
PHONE : ~ a
PLEASE NOTE: (After filling out, give to the Deputy
Clerk. Thank you.)
p, p p E A R A N r E• R E (~ U E S T
PUBLIC HEARING ON ~ J ~ ~~
I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to
recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so
that I may comment. I agree to follow the guidelines listed
below. WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND
ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD.
1. Each speaker will have between three and five minutes
available whether speaking as an individual or
representative. The chairman will decide the time limit
based on the number of citizens speaking onthe majoritynof
will enforce the rule unless instructed by
the Board to do otherwise.
2, Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of
view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by
the Chairman.
3, All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between
a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed.
4. Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all
times .
5, Speakers are requested to leave any written statements
and/or comments with the clerk.
g, INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL
FILE WITHTHEEINDIVIDUALTTONREPRESENTATHEM.FROM THE GROUP
ALLOWING
P L E A S E W R I T E L E G I B L Y
NAME : // 1~' C ~ ~ ~ C~T'j7~/~S C~/i~
ADDRESS: •~~ ~~ / `/~G'~~'F'~ ~'tJ <-S
~~ ~ N G ~ ~ ~ ~i~- Z ~ ~ /J
PHONE : ''2" ~/,
PLEASE NOTE: (After filling out, give to the Deputy
Clerk. Thank you.)
Item ~ ~~
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
IN ROANOKE, VA., ON TUESDAY,
MEETING DATE:
February 23, 1988
SUBJECT: Community Development Block Grant Public Hearing
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
To facilitate the location of Tweeds, Inc. at the joint Botetourt
County-Roanoke County industrial site on U.S. Highway 460 at
Bonsack, we will be submitting a regional application with
Botetourt County for 1988 Virginia Community Development Block
Grant Funds (VCDBG). Each County will be applying for $250,000
for a total joint application of $500,000. These funds will
cover the cost of public water and sewer service extension, land
acquisition, and site grading of the property.
Separate from this VCDBG application, Botetourt County will be
working with the Virginia Department of Transportation to secure
up to $300,000 from its Industrial Access Fund program to provide
access to the site through Botetourt County.
The steps in the attached "7:00 p.m. CDBG Public Hearing
Procedure" sheet must be followed to ensure compliance with the
state grant program's public hearing and information requirements.
Following this is (1) a copy of the Information Sheet which staff
will make available to the audience and (2) the CDBG resolution
for adoption by the Board.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None at this time.
RECOMMENDATION:
Conduct the public hearing, and, after receiving input from the
public, adopt the resolution to apply for CDBG funds.
SUBMITTED BY:
Brent D. Sheffl
Economic Development Specialist
APPROVED:
`f ~w/
G
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
----------------------------------------------------------------
ACTION VOTE
Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs
Denied ( ) Garrett
Received ( ) Johnson
Referred McGraw
To Nickens
Robers
Attachment
~r~_ .
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 23, 1988
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING SUBMITTAL OF
APPLICATION FOR 1988 VIRGINIA COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDS
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
WHEREAS, Roanoke County and Botetourt County will
submit a 1988 regional application for Virginia Community Develop-
ment Block Grant (VCDBG) funds, and
WHEREAS, This regional project's name is the Tweeds,
Inc. Economic Development Project, and
WHEREAS, Roanoke County will request $250,000 of VCDBG
funds, and Botetourt County will request $250,000 in similar fund-
ing, and
WHEREAS, Up to $300,000 from the Virginia Department of
Transportation Industrial Access Fund Program will be used to
provide an access road to the project site, and
WHEREAS, Up to 108 low and moderate income persons are
projected to receive employment from this project, and
WHEREAS, Citizen participation requirements have been
complied with through a duly publicized public hearing.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, That the Roanoke County
Board of Supervisors authorizes the County Administrator to sign
and submit all appropriate information and documents necessary to
constitute an application for 1988 VCDBG funds.
~~~
1988 Virginia Community Development Block Grant Public Hearing
INFORMATION SHEET
For distribution at Board of Supervisors
February 23, 1988 Public Hearing
1. The amount of funds available for pro osed community
development and housin activities:
$377,857.00
2. The range of activities ro osed to be undertaken•
The public water and sewer service extension; land
acquistion; and site grading.
3. The estimated amount ro osed for activities that will
benefit low- and moderate-income persons:
Roanoke County proposes to apply for $250,000 of the funds
available to it. This is a joint application with Botetourt
County for a total funding request of $500,000 to cover all
activities described in item 2. Up to 108 low- and
moderate-income persons will benefit from jobs created.
4. The local government's plan to minimize dis lacement
resulting from CDBG assisted activities:
The property in question is an open field; no displacement
will occur.
5. The local government's lan to assist ersons dis laced as a
result of CDBG assisted activities; and.
See above: No displacement will occur.
6. The local government's past use of CDBG funds, if
applicable:
Roanoke County entered into a regional community development
project in the Hollins area with Roanoke County in 1985.
Roanoke County's commitment of VCDBG funds to this project
totals $322,143 in housing rehabilitation, park development,
and private to state standard road construction activity.
.C . '~
w ,- ~~
7:00 P.M. CDBG PUBLIC HEARING PROCEDURE:
1. The Chairman opens the public hearin and indicates that the
staff has some information sheets relative to a proposal to
use 1988 CDBG funds.
2. The Chairman inquires if there is anyone present who would
like to provide input on general local community development
and housing needs.
3. The Chairman acknowled es that any comments received have
become part of the public record and will be duly
considered.
4. Chairman announces that the County has an opportunity to
submit a regional CDBG application with Botetourt County for
the Tweeds, Inc. economic development project for the cost
of extension of public water and sewer services, land
acquisition and site grading. Chairman inquires of the
public if there is any input on this proposal.
5. In closing the public hearin , the Chairman inquires if
there are comments on CDBG funds which have been used in the
joint Roanoke and Botetourt County Hollins Community
Development project.
6. After receiving any in ut, the Chairman thanks those who may
have offered comments and closes the public hearing.
t ~ ~ ~~ '~
1988 Virginia Community Development Block Grant Public Hearing
INFORMATION SHEET
For distribution at Board of Supervisors
February 23, 1988 Public Hearing
1. The amount of funds available for proposed community
development and housing activities:
$322,143.00
2. The range of activities proposed to be undertaken:
Public water and sewer service extension; land acquistion;
and site grading.
3. The estimated amount proposed for activities that will
benefit low- and moderate-income persons:
Roanoke County proposes to apply for $250,000 of the funds
available to it. This is a joint application with Botetourt
County for a total funding request of $500,000 to cover all
activities described in item 2. Up to 108 low- and
moderate-income persons will benefit from jobs created.
4. The local government's plan to minimize displacement
resulting from CDBG assisted activities:
The property in question is an open field; no displacement
will occur.
5. The local government's plan to assist persons displaced as a
result of CDBG assisted activities; and,
See above: No displacement will occur.
6. The local government's past use of CDBG funds, if
applicable:
Roanoke County entered into a regional community development
project in the Hollins area with Botetourt County in 1985.
Roanoke County's commitment of VCDBG funds to this project
totals $377,857 in housing rehabilitation, park development,
and private to state standard road construction activity.
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
Notice is hereby given to all interested persons that the
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at
their evening session beginning at 7:00 p.m. on Tuesday, February
23, 1988 in the Community Room of the Roanoke County
Administration Center, 3738 Brambleton Avenue S. W., Roanoke
Virginia, to solicit public input on local community development
and housing needs, and on the proposed application for Community
Development Block Grant funding for TWEEDS, INC. economic
development project.
Information on the amount of funding to be requested, the
estimated amount to benefit low and moderate income persons,
proposed activities, and plans to minimize displacement and
provide displacement assistance as necessary will be available.
Citizens also are given the opportunity to comment on Roanoke
County's past use of CDBG funds.
This public hearing will serve to meet state and federal
requirements concerning local community development and housing
needs, and the proposed community development block grant
application. All interested citizens are urged to attend.
Application, documentation, the draft application, and
records on previous CDBG activities are available to the public
for review. For further information, contact Brent Sheffler,
Economic Development Specialist, at 772-2095.
z7v~
Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
PLEASE PUBLISH IN THE NON LEGAL
SECTION IN THE MORNING AND
EVENING EDITION OF THE ROANOKE TIMES
AND WORLD NEWS ON:
Tuesday, February 16, 1988
DIRECT BILL FOR PUBLICATION
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
P. 0. Box 29800
Roanoke, Virginia 24018
APPENDIX 5
Citizen Participation Requirements
In order to meet federally mandated citizen participation
requirements local governments must make specific types of information
available to the public and hold at least one public hearing. In the
case of a regional application. each participating local government must
meet all of the citizen participation requirements outlined in this
Appendix. Guidelines on the types of information to be made available,
on public input to be solicited, and on holding a public hearing are
provided below:
Information Requirements
Local governments must provide citizens information on:
1. The amount of funds available for proposed community
development and housing activities;
2. The range of activities proposed to be undertaken;
i
~ 3. The estimated amount proposed for activities that will bene t
~ low- and moderate-income persons;
i
4. The local government's plan to minimize displacement resulting
from CDBG assisted activities;
5. The local government's plan to assist persons displaced as a
result of CDBG assisted activities; and
6. The local government's past use of CDBG funds, if applicable.
Public Input Requirements
Applicant localities must solicit the views of their citizens on
the following:
1. General local housing and community development needs;
2. The locality's past use of CDBG funds over the last 5 years,
if applicable; and
3, The locality's proposed CDBG project.
Citizens should be provided a reasonable period of time before CIG
application deadline in order to have the opportunity to influence the
type and location of the CDBG project for which the community applies.
Oral and written comments should be accepted. The locality should make
available to the public files relating to previous CDBG projects and the
current project, including the draft and final revisions of the CIG
proposal.
AS/88 1
Public Hearing Requirements
Local governments must meet the following public hearing
regcirements:
1. Hold at least one public hearing on general local community
development and housing needs, the proposed VCDBG application,
and the availability of the items specified above under
Information Requirements;
2. Publish a notice to advertise the public hearing at least
seven days prior to the date of the hearing in the non-legal
section of a local newspaper of general circulation; and
3. Maintain files which contain documentary evidence that the
hearing was held. The files should contain proof of
publication of the hearing notice, written and/or recorded
minutes of the hearing, and a list of citizens attending the
hearing.
The checklist below will help localities make sure that pertinent
items are covered at the public hearing:
1. Handouts providing the required information outlined above;
2. Copies of the descriptive application summary;
3. Solicit input on general local community development and
housing needs
4. Solicit input on the project proposed for funding; and
S. Solicit comments on past use of CDBG funds (over the last S
years), if applicable.
A model public hearing advertisement is shown below. DHCD does not
require that this format be used; it is offered as guidance.
Model Public Hearing Advertisement
~2oAM0/c,~ Ld.?}JTY FE6kSA/sY Z3,~968
(Locality's name) will hold a public hearing on (date) at (time) at
~ht ~u,okndw~"}~~ioT (location) to solicit public input on local community development and
~P„f~~ housing needs and on the proposed application for community development
block grant funding for (project name).
Tweeds, lrtt,~ EcoNa~++~c OPVC~~a~'.e~t..1 p~~jc~cfi
Information on the amount of funding to be requested, the
estimated amount to benefit low- and moderate-income persons, proposed
activities, and plans to minimize displacement and provide displacement
assistance as necessary will be available. Citizens also are given the
opportunity to comment on (locality's name)'s past use of CDBG funds.
~oahOkl ~oUN~)r'S
AS/88 2
State and federal requirements mandate that one or moreneedsiand
hearings be held on local community development anlicationg This
the proposed community development block grant app
hearing will serve to meet that requirement. All interested citizens
are urged to attend. For additional informa~tiosr~~con~~a; t (Local contact
persons) ~i-woke Co,.,.~ty``S F<z^~~»,c .,~. ,
qty -er draft application, and
3tion, Application documentation, the (i~'i- ~ ublic for
records on previous CDBG activities are available to the p
review.
t
egal Note: Local governments are encouragrovidehotherolocally appropriate
of one public hearing andortunities.
citizen participation opp
:he
ied
e the
inent
rove;
ast 5
does not
time) at
t and
lopment
oposed
acement
ven the
unds.
AS/88 - 3
AT A REGULAR MEETIN HELD T AT BO HE ROA OKE VCOUNTYOFADMINOISTRATION
COUNTY, VIRGINIA,
CENTER ON TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 23, 1988
RESOLUTION 22388-8 AUTHORIZING SUBMITTAL OF
APPLICATION FOR 1988 VIRGINIA COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDS
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
WHEREAS, Roanoke County and Botetourt County will submit a
1988 regional application for Virginia Community Development
Block Grant (VCDBG) funds, and
WHEREAS, This regional project's name is the Tweeds,
Inc. Economic Development Project, and
WHEREAS, Roanoke County will request $250,000 of VCDBG
funds, and Botetourt County will request $250,000 in similar
funding, and
WHEREAS, Up to $300,000 from the Virginia Department of
Transportation Industrial Access Fund Program will be used to
provide an access road to the project site, and
WHEREAS, Up to 108 low and moderate income persons are
and
projected to receive employment from this project,
WHEREAS, Citizen participation requirements have been
complied with through a duly publicized public hearing.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, That the Roanoke County
Board of Supervisors authorizes the County Administrator to sign
and submit all appropriate information and documents necessary to
constitute an application for 1988 VCDBG funds.
On motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by Supervisor
McGraw, and upon the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
2/24/88
A COPY - TESTE:
l~
Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Brent Sheff_l.er, Economic Development Specialist
Timothy Gubala, Assistant County Administrator
Clerk, Botetourt County Board of Supervisors
PETITIONER: GEORGE JAC7OB y .2. ~ ~ - ~`~
CASE N[,~RBER: 10-2/88
Planning Cccttnission Hearing Date: February 23/11988
Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: February
1. RFX2UEST
Petition of George Jacob to rezone a 0.678 acre tract from B-2, Business to M- ,
Industrial to assemble musical accessories, located at 6024 Williamson Road in
the Hollins Magisterial District.
2. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION
Two citizens stated their concerns at the Planning Commission Public Hearing:
effect on property values; possible dust, noise and odor pollution; location of
light industrial district next to a residential district.
3. SIGNIFICANT IMPACT FACTORS
a. Comprehensive Plan: 1985 Comprehensive Development Plan has placed this area
within a Neighborhood Conservation land use category, however, it is the
observation of staff that the property was incorrectly designated in 1985. A
more appropriate designation would be Transition for the following reasons:
1) Property along Williamson Road from the Roanoke City limits to the
intersection with Route 117 is designated either Core, Transition, or Surface
Water and Flood Hazard with the exception of the subject parcel. 2)
Existing zoning along that same portion of Williamson Road is either B-2 or
B-3 with the exception of one parcel zoned M-1.
Light industrial uses are prohibited uses in the Neighborhood Conservation
land use category with no compatibility. Light industrial uses are
prohibited uses in Transition land use categories with no compatibility
unless located within an industrial park developed with exceptional design
measures to assure compatibility with adjacent locations (TR-6).
b. Signage: Although Signage proffered to be limited to surface mount on build-
ing and existing sign standard on property, it should be limited in size,
i.e., 32 sq.ft. Design should be specified.
4, PROFFERED CONDITIONS
a. The manufacturing activity on the property will only be those allowed under
Sect. 21-24-1A items 4, 6, and 10.
b. No outside storage of any materials either raw or finished.
c. Signage will be limited to surface mount on building and us ft f a d twig 1 lbe
standard on property. Sign will be no more than 32 sq.
unlighted. ro sed use be terminated.
d. The zoning will revert to B-2 zoning should the p po
5. COMMISSIONER'S MOTION, VOTE AND REASON
Mrs. Flippen moved to approve the petition with proffered conditions. The motion
carried with the following roll call vote:
AYES: Jones, Flippen, Witt, Winstead
NAYS : None
ABSENT: Gordon
6. DISSENTING PERSPDCTIVE
a. None.
7. ATTACf~IENTS
Concept Plan (8~" x 11")
Vicinity Map (8~" x 11")
~.J(~C.
Dale Cas
~taf f Report
Other:
ng Ccetunission Alt. Secretary
6
I ~
yo'' Q
-~Z ~r ~
h ~~ ~t
Q,~,..rn~^ his
2Z
~ V
'~ (q) ~ k j
~" F:_ ~
~~
~l
r
-S ~ : MN/9Y/A A1N/a7.~ 3~DM~17J' '' -+ a ~ ~
_ ~°~~m a N
€ a: 4N//102.x' ~ m m ~
'~ ~ ~~ ~_~ ~[_ /JIf.~ 1d37N0.7 a ~~y ~ ~r ~y ~ ~
~ S ~ ~ ~ ~! , ~ ~ Wn~~ ~yy~~~lNtf '~ ~ o g ~ a
:~~ ~
~~~ a~
\ ~ ~~
\ "ey
} \
+~~ '
Q , ~g„
? ~
Q .~~~J
4 ~a6
ka~ ~ l
~ r I
V
i
$~ n
~ 0~
p~~F~
WZ ~lwQ
ODiO~
1aa7 ~aR
Y
A
f
a~o;.
j-oo~~R
V .....C
~at~~3
g
F29
~~
6~ c~-
r\ ~O
- 2 -
8
u
N
N I
h
~'
h Y
Q
'', I
3
e
0
Q
Y~
~aa
o~
Y3
R
i
R
O j
~
Q ~ V
Q
~~ ~
~
~ ?
N,
~~ Qm~z~ v~.
Q 2 ~
~~~
o.>
o
~~ \
o
ao
~ a
~ ~ W ~ O ~
Z
Q~Qh~
Y~
Q ~~ W~
~~~~~ ~~
~~
~ ~ ~
CASE NUMBER: 10-2/88
REVIEWED BY: LIZ PARCELL
STAFF REPORT
PETITIONER: GEORGE JACOB
DATES JANUARY 27, 1988
Petition of George Jacob to rezone a 0.678 acre tract from B-2, Business
to M-1, Industrial to assemble musical accessories, located a t 6024
Williamson Road in the Hollins Magisterial District.
1. NATURE OF REQUEST
a. Conditional request to utilize an existing 6,000 square foot
building to assemble percussion instrument accessories from
purchased components.
b. Attached concept plan and zoning vicinity map describe project
more fully.
2. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS
~s a wide variety of light industrial
M-l pe~mi
a
and manufacturing
;
.
Petitioner has proffered that the use
-uses of the property
.
will be limited to: (1) the manufacture or assembling of
products from the following material; cellophane, canvas, cloth,
cork, fiber, glass, leather, paper, plastic, straw, textiles,
wood, and yarn; (2) the manufacture of music al instruments,
-toys, novelties and rubber and metal stamps; and (3) wholesale
business and storage warehouses.
b. Site plan review will be required to insure compliance with
County regulations.
c. VDOT entrance permit is required.
3. SITE CHARACTERISTICS
a. Topography: Property slopes downward toward old VA Secondary
Route 623.
b. Ground Cover: Existing building with paved parking lot;
escarpment south of building covered with scrub vegetation and
some trees.
4. AREA CHARACTERISTICS
a. Future Growth Priority: Situated within the Peters Creek
Community Planning Area; designated for stimulated growth.
Currently served by urban services.
b. General area is developed with a major highway (U.S. 11)
as well as densely developed, mixed commercial, office, and
residential uses.
5. LAND USE IMPACT ASSESSMENT
Rating: Rate each factor according to the impact of the proposed
action. Use a scale of 1 through 5.
1 = positive impact, 2 = negligible impact, 3 = manageable impact,
4 = disruptive impact, 5 = severe impact, and N/A = not applicable.
- 4 -
RATING FACTOR ~ COMMENTS ~~~.~-
LAND USE COMPATIBILITY
4 a. Comprehensive Plan: 1985 Comprehensive Development Plan has
placed this area within a Neighborhood Conservation land use
category, however, it is the observation of staff roariate
property was incorrectly designated in 1985. Amore app p
designation would be Transition for the following relim is to
Property along Williamson Road from the Roanoke City
the intersection with Route 117 is designated either Core,
Transition, or Surface Water and Flood Hazard with the exception
of the sof ]Willpamson• Road Esleither B 12gorlBn3 wit sthe
portion
exception of one parcel zoned M-1.
Light industrial uses are prohibited uses in the Neighb~rhgohfl
Conservation land use category with no compatibility.
industrial uses are prohibited uses in Transition land use
categories with no compatibility unless located within an
industrial park developed with exceptional design measures to
assure compatibility with adjacent locations (TR-6).
3 b. Surrounding Land: Subject property adjoins heavily traveled
primary highway and is surrounded by high density residential
development as well as existing commercial facilities. The
Brookside Golf Course is immediately across Williamson Road.
3 c. Neighbo-ring Area: Primarily mixed commercial, institutional and
residential.
3 d. Site Layout: Predetermined by existing structure.
3 e. Architecture: Existing block building will be used.
Neutral Williamsburg colors would enhance new cedar shake roof.
3 f. Screening and Landscape: Per ordinance.
2 g. Amenities: Parking adequate for proposed use; inadequate number
of spaces for typical commercial use allowed by existing zoning.
2 h. Natural Features: Combination of existing slope and screening
and buffering requirements will shield roof of building from
homes on Commander Drive.
TRAFFIC
1 i. Street Capacities: Estimated traffic generation is roximately
per day. US Route 11 currently has an ADT of app
19,000. A new commercial use would generate substantially more
traffic.
3 j. Circulation: Immediate access to US Route 11. Proposed
development will use existing commercial entrance. Entrance
permit will have to be renewed. Petitioner should encourage
VDOT to upgrade old VA Secondary Route 623 in order to use as
ingress/egress to enhance internal circulation.
UTILITIES
2 k. Water: Adequate source, adequate distribution.
2 1. Sewer: Adequate transmission,5adequate treatment.
"'' 'y
DRAINAGE _
2 m. Basin: No negative impacts anticipated.
2 n. Floodplain: Building is approximately 200 feet south of
floodplain.
PUBLIC SERVICES
2 0. Fire Protection: Within established service standard.
2 p. Rescue: Within established service standard.
N/A q. Parks and Recreation:
N/A r. School:
TAX BASE
2 s. - Land and Improvement Value: $152,000
- Taxable Gross Sales/Year: $260,000
- Total Employees: 2 roximately $1,200
- Total revenue to the County/Year: App
-ENVIRONMENT
2 t. Air:
2 u. Water:
2 v. Soils:
2 w. Noise:
4 x. signage: Although signage proffered to be limited to surface
mount on building and existing sign standard on property, it
should also be limited in size i.e. 32 sq.ft. Design should be
specified.
6. PLAN CONSISTENCY
This area is designated as a NeigTherpetatioonerVStioequestuis
category by the Land Use Map.
inconsistent with the determinants cited within the Neighborhood
Conservation land use category.
7. STAFF EVALUATION
a~. Strengths: (1) Petitioner proposes to use an existing vacan
building which has been vacant for 8 months. (2) Petitioner has
proffered no outside storage of any materials either raw or
finished. (3) Petitioner has limited permitted uses of property.
(4) Although not located within an industrial park as encourages
in TR-6, design and proposed use of existing building
compatible with adJlesstthanptraffic generatedlbyg any fdthe
proposed use will be
existing permitted uses.
b. Weaknesses: (1) Although signage proffered to be limited to
surface mount on building and existing sign standard on
property, signage should be limited to 32 sq.ft. andlsmmple
design, consistent lettering style, adequate spacing,
geometric shape. (2) Inconsistent with Neighborhood Conservation
land use types and policies. (3) Even though traffic gradintlof
is minimal, circulation would be enhanced with upg g
entrance on old VA Secondary-R6ute 623.
VIRGINIA:
BEFORE THE BOARD OE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUN'T'Y
A 0.678 acre parcel of land, )
generally located at )
6024 Williamson Road )
within the Hollins )
Magisterial District, and )
recorded as parcel # 38.06-6-2 )
in the Roanoke County Tax Records.
RDOOPR~NDATION
TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE CO[JDfI'Y:
z ~ .~ ~
WHEREAS, your Petitioner George Jacob
has filed with the Secretary to the Planning Commission a petition to rezone the
above-referenced parcel of land from B-2 District
to M-1 District for the purpose of assembly with
some light manufacturing
WHEREAS, the petition was referred to the Planning Ccmmission which, after due
legal notice as reguired by Section 15.1-431 of the Code of Virginia of 1950,-as
amended, did hold a public hearing on February 2 19 88 ;and
WHEREAS, at that public hearing all parties in interest were afforded an
opportunity to be heard; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due consideration has recatunended to
the Board of County Supervisors that the rezoning be
approved with conditions
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission recommends to the
Board o~ County Supervisors that the above-referenced tercel of land
be rezoned to M-1
The above action was adopted on motio~,..c~f„ Flippen _ _ and upon the
following recorded vote:
AYES: Jones, Flippen, Witt, Winstead
NAYS. None
ABSENT: '
Gordon
VIRGINIA: ~ ~ ~~
BEEC)RE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COiJN'I'Y
0_ 6 7 8 -acre parcel of land, )
A
generally located a t )
6024 Williamson Road )
Hollins ) FINAL O~F~
within the
Magisterial District, and
recorded as parcel # 3 8.06-6-2 )
in the Roanoke County Tax Records. >
`iC~ THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY:
our Petitioner George Jacob
WHEREAS, y reel
did petition the Board of County Supervisors to rezone the above-referenced pa
District
t to M 1
2
Distric
from B-
for the purpose of assembly with some light manufacturing
~ WHEREAS, after due legal notice, the Planning Commission did ha d a P hies
~ tition on Februarv 2 19 88 , at which time, P
N hearing of the pe
rtunit to be heard; and
in interest were given an oppo Y
WHEREF,S, after full consideration, the Board of C h cond Pionss 1rs deta d i3ed
approved wit
C~ that the rezoning be
on February 23, 1988.
rcel of land, which is
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDERED that the aforementioned Pa and recorded
fined in the Roanoke County Tax Maps as Parcel 38.06-2-2 zoned from
o conta
v i n Deek Book 6 9 8 Page __? 9__ and legally described below, be re
M- 1 District.
B-2 DistrDQe~i to
- 7 -
l ""~
Legal Description of Property:
GINNING at a point on the westerlyf~idelnfpreviousudeed), 11,
BE
100.0 ft. (erroneously shown as 1
therl from the intersection of thb t~sextended~;ethenceuwithla
sou Y ° ~~
and the southerly side of route 62 , ~~
division line between Lots 12iBnenoflLot~11; thence NO 0°•0' 30
200.17 ft. to an iron on the
W. 222.25 ft. to an old iron °n 64°t4062E. 181n29 ftth the
southerly side of Route 623, S revious deed), to the
(erroneously shown as 193.73 ft. in P whose
beginning of a curve; thence with a curve to the righoint on the
radius is 25 ft., an arc distance of 23.09 ft. toSa p1° 58' 30" E.
westerly side of RouCe of~BEGINNING,tandoBEING1a11 of Lot 12-C,
87.56 ft. to the pla which
according to a survey made for Captain'CaGtain'soGpove,lonached
showing a division of Lot 12, Block 1, P 1962, att
T,p. Parker, S.C.E., July 16,
survey was made by
and amde a part of the Deed record~hei~iDcuatBCour698orpthe 2 ~
to
at page 31, in the Clerk s Office o
County of Roanoke, Virginia; and
BEING the same property conveyed to asmhereinaboversebyforth.
recorded in Deed Book 698, page 29,
BE IT FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this order be transmitted to the Secretary
of the Planning Commission and that he be directed to reflect that change on the
official zoning map of Roanoke County.
Johnson and upon the
ADOPTED on motion of Supervisor
following recorded vote: Garrett
AYES• Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens,
~yS: None
AgSEDPr:
~~~~, ~ , Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
CC• Rob Stalzer, Director of Planning
• John Willey, Real Estate Assessments
Arnold Covey, Director of8Development Review
VIRGINIA:
BF~'ORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY
A 0_ 6_ 7 8 acre parcel of land, )
generally located a t )
6024 Williamson Road
within the Hollins
Magisterial District, and .
recorded as parcel # 38.06-6-2 )
in the Roanoke County Tax Records.
PROFFER
OF
CONDITIONS
Tp TEiE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROp,NOKE COUNTY:
"` "~
of the Code of Virginia and Sec.
Being in accord with Sec. 15.1-491.1 et seq.
the Petitioner George Jacob
21-105E of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance, voluntarily proffers to the
hereby
rvisors of Roanoke County, Virginia the following conditions to the
Board of Supe
rezoning of the above-referenced parcel of land:
activit on the property will only be those
~ 1. The manufacturing y ( and 10
~ allowed under Section 21-24-1.A items 4, ,
`V 2. No outside storage of any materials either raw or finishe
3. Signage will be limited toonurTOCertyunt on building and use
~~ of existing sign standa fd. and wilpl be unlighted.
`u Sign will be no mere. than 32 sq• X~~~~~~~~~i~~~
0
Respectfully suYxnitted,
Petitioner f
- ~ -
L E G A L N O T I C E
Notice is hereby given to all interested persons that the
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at their
evening session beginning at 7:00 p.m. on Tuesday, February 23, 1988, in
the Community Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 3738
Brambleton Avenue, S.W., Roanoke, Virginia, on the petition of George
Jacob requesting rezoning from B-2, Business to M-l, Industrial of a
tract containing 0.678 acre and located at 6024 Williamson Road in the
Hollins Magisterial District.
Rezoning has been requested to assemble musical accessories.
The County Planning Commission recommends approval with proffered
conditions.
A copy of the Zoning Ordinance of Roanoke County and amendments
thereto as well as a copy of the petition, site plan, and other
documents related to this request may be examined in the office of the
Department of Planning and Zoning, located in Room 600 of the Roanoke
County Administration Center.
Roanoke County will provide assistance to handicapped persons
desiring to attend public hearings. Such individuals are requested to
contact the County office of Personnel Services ([703] 772-2018) if
special provisions are necessary for attendance.
Given under my hand this 3rd day of February, 1988.
.~/•~~c.~~---
Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
Please publish in the evening edition
of the Roanoke Times and World News on:
February 9, 1988
February 16, 1988
Direct the bill for Publication to:
Mr. George Jacob
8440 Barrens Road
Roanoke, VA 24019
z~S- ,~
PETITIONER: JONES & JONES ASSOCIATES
CASE NI,~IBER: 8-2/88
Planning Commission Hearing Date: February 2, 1988
Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: February 23, 1988
1. REl;2LTEST '
Petition of Jones and Jonesf as 25cfootsright1ofcwayaknowndasaJonespStreet
Associates to vacate a portion o
from Peters Creek Road west approximately 170 feet in the Catawba Magisterial
District.
2. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION
One citizen was present ntshouldabelgiven~tosthe possibility ofnclosing he
following. consideratio
remainder of Jones Street.
3. SIGNIFICANT IMPACT FAC'T'ORS
a. None.
4. PROFFERED CONDITIONS
a. The dedication of a 20 foot easement for water and sewer.
5, CONP~IISSIONER' S MC-PION, VOrT'E AND REASON
Mr. Jones moved to approve 1 capl vote n with proffered condition. The motion
carried with the following rol
AYES: Jones, Flippen, Witt, Winstead
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Gordon
6. DISSENTING PERSPEC`T'IVE
a. None.
7. ATTACf~'IENTS
Concept Plan (8~" x 11")
Vicinity Map (8~" x 11")
Staff Report
Other:
~~ ~~
Dale Castellow, Planning Connnission Alt. Secretary
S.
9
d
~.
9.
r
M
ri
N
M
~y~+~ NOISSIl3dOJ ~NINNV'ld x11~I1O~ 3;ICN~IVON .11~C~7;)V ~~
~O3AONddV
M~~ ,ps
'1S 1H~IMa
3 OOOS Bh S ---~-
S6 £91
I~ ~ - -
1
'M
.c
~ N
~~
O 'O
"' O
.~
Z ~.
.n ~
r~ M
~
fWa N z
N ,
Y ~~
~~° - - -
u~:
3"
O
p
A ~
`~ d
W -
W N
~~ '' }-O
„
- Fes r V
1
I -- -
-I~ - ~
-
-
-
-- - r
o ti 31ON 77S ~
.£6~Z51
-- M „0000,£S N
I ~ p
_7~
_~ I I ~ ?
N ~
O
~
~
_ ~
M
~_I
- ~
_
- - - ~-I r
^- -- -
N W ,I
~~ i
I
~ ~
Q _ -V - ~_
r •pO I
I r, Q
Z • tJ ~9
r
N W M
r ~-,- -a W
`~ O - -
_
z
J
7_
~ _I_
~
1-
r `~
? I
I r
~~ ~~
~ _
_
~I
~
N
I I
N
n I
N
-_ 1
~"~ 1`~
i N
4
M~~ '1S S3tJ0
MJ
W
Q
~.
r
~~"
„ ~
~ x
~'/`
l~
~ V
O
~ t ^
T {~,
e~
J'1 {•-,
W
0--
- 2 -
w
r 4 r
o ~ HH
oa ~0. ~ rVp~+d~
~ N ~ S wN In+Ha.+
a d a d a '+ ~-+ V . n
w_ r G ~~"'o
Q a 4" a
w< wi ~z''vc~~m
V W G-d ozo~~ o
wz Jx ~ c~
Nd ~~ ~
> p > R1
rt W <
d ~
O
z
O
Qy~ ~
~ N
W
.p N A d
r~
(.q.~ N
Q ~ ~ '~
W ~ ~ ~
~a~
.ti N t+l ~?
~ ~
W
H
M
~
~
p
o.
~ H
7
a W ~ V
WWWV1 r7 O 4
r~~a0
~
M
~
(µ]~]
rJ ~ ~
L] ~
3p~ ~[
W~~
N~~ V1 ~
'
, ~
I
.i l
J ~
aD ?
~ ~
N ~
~ 3
O ~
N O ~ •"'
00 O~ol ;.~°~u
o°rnrnam
nO~d Nt~1 NCO` J f~/1
p.-.N .+VI r~O
..+
~a'""VWp ~,[-a~V~O
~v~~~~ E;A~~~ET3
a
~o U
N
~' ~
.O
O O L7
.1 r+
W Q
J
v ~ `~
„~~ ^•
o
LLWME wus ~ a s ~,~ ..... yf ns^.
s r f¢
t
ha
ANDS
1.1.5 i
v F
`NG10~ 0~ ~~
'
~.~
r o ~S NCO ~"
• P`
f
~{~iJiIJN~~y~!,~ °L
~,,r •,yft~. [
r`~~628 ^[ns.~. $~ y
4i O N,DO~(lOM
tnrc~3ittiv $
~
_
~ ?THN~I
N~
'APTS. off'
~
~
W
~
~iu~',~V ~~~
~M
O f8 4
~
So~F pF NaNtl
C~ M
DENT
623 q
.
Q
P
~/ '. P
PO 0
ro.ro~[wi [rte ;[!B~MI
c+«rs*uri schobia
~
f
tP
~ COy
n`^HOra
~
.n
<F,py eR%~9 o
~ROyµE~ v
s CAPp A~
}.
~~~~
~~~ ~ /,MOM O -
"
r Y
_
~CREST ..... QO
~r.~Rr
._
1111'IIJITV 1AAD
• ^v~~~^ ^ ^ ^nr~^
D
unDTu
- 3 -
A
~ _ '+
_'~ ROANOKE COUNTY Jones ~ Jones/Medical Properties Associates
d DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT Right-of-Way Vacation
e s[
~:7 ~-
STAFF REPORT
CASE NUMBER: 8-2/88
REVIEWED BY: ROB STALZER KS
PETITIONER: JONES & JONES ASSOCIATES
DATE: JANUARY 27, 1988
Petition of Jones and Jones Associates Architects and Medical Properties
Associates to vacate a portion of a 25 foot right-of-way known as Jones
Street from Peters Creek Road west approximately 170 feet in the Catawba
Magisterial District.
Background: Request to vacate a right-of-way 25 feet wide and
approximately 183 feet long. Right-of-way adjoins recently rezoned
property. that intends to use right-of-way for business access.
1. IMPACT ON EXISTING LAND USE
Property abuts existing single family residential subdivision,
recently rezoned vacant tract, and Peters Creek Road, a heavily
traveled major arterial highway. Neighboring area is mixed single
family residential, office and retail service and convenience uses.
Surrounding zoning includes R-E, Residential Estates, to the south
and west, B-2 to the north; and B-1 to the east across Peters Creek
Road. Right-of-way has never been improved. Right-of-way vacation
will not have a negative effect on existing land use.
2. IMPACT ON FUTURE LAND USE
Adjoining property was rezoned to permit construction of a
convenience store and drive-thru lubrication facility. Approved,
proffered concept plan proposes to use right-of-way as an exit only
for the convenience store. Right-of-way vacation is necessary for
the development of the proposed adjacent future land use. Right-of-
way vacation could limit access to remaining vacant property not
fronting Peters Creek Road. Note, however, that right-of-way width
is only 25 feet. A width of 50 feet is required to construct a
state maintained road. Recently adopted County corridor study
recommends use of shared access to serve commercial properties
fronting arterial highways. Vacation could discourage the
implementation of this policy.
3. IMPACT ON UTILITIES
The Utility Department recommends that if the right-of-way is
vacated, the County should retain a water and sewer easement 20 feet
wide to protect future County interests. Easement acquisition is
time consuming and difficult.
4. OTHER IMPACTS
Virginia Department of Transportation has no objection to the propos-
ed vacation because of the width of the right-of-way. The Roanoke
County Engineering Department recommends denial stating that the
right-of-way is a reasonable location for access to possible future
subdivision development on adjacent vacant land.
- 4 -
vlar:lNlA:
B'.:FnRE THr 30ARn OF gt?nFgVTgf~R.S nF ROANOKr CnUN'~Y
IN F.E: Vacation o£ Jones Street Right of Wap)
in the Dwight Hills Subdivision of ~
Roanoke County, Virginia ) RECD?t?4ENDATION
)
Jones & Jones Associates Architects and
'.VfiEF.°AS , Medical Pro ernes Associates
did petition the Board of Supervisors of P.oanoke County,
Cirginia, renuesting that The Jones Street Right of Way
be permanently closed and vacated; and
`9:?E.^.SAS, the Planning Commission has given careful
consideration to said petition a.nd to said referral of the
Board of Supervisors and has heard evidence touching the
merits of said permanent closing and vacation of The
Jones Street Right of Way as shown
on Plat of Medical Properties Associates, prepared by Balzer and
Associates, Inc., dated April 2B, 19Sb
tehich plat i.s attached to the petition filed herein.
~0!", '?'HF.REFQItF, 95 IT PTRnLVEP and ordered that at the
regular meetinP, of the Planning Commission of Roanoke County,
February $$
Virginia, held on the 2nd of 19 that
a portion of Jones
the petition to permanently close and vacate
Street as shown on tine
D131:, hereinabove set forth, is hereby approved and this
Planning Commission accordingly hereby recommends in
accordance with the provisions of the Code of Virginia to
the Soard of Supervisors of °oanoke County, Virginia that
Jones Street Right of Way as shown on
tae plat prepared by Balzer and Associates
he approved with condition
"" .,
E
. and be it further RESQI.VEP th;,t a copy of this resolution
be fortbrvith.certified and delivered by the Secretary
of this Planning Commission to the Clerk of the Board of
Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia.
.. Jo.n~s
i The above action was adopted on motion of '
seconded by
I
~ and upon the following recorded vote:
I
AYES: Jones, Flippen, !Jitt, lJinstead
\AYS : None
ABSE^"":' Gordon
Z88--S
Roanoke County Planning Commission
N
l
E
z
w
z
Up
H
N
.s
0
w
0
a
a'
a
a
r
VIRGINIA: ~
BEFORE THE 60ARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY
Vacation of Jones Street Right of Way ~ ~
in th3 Dwight Hills Subdivision of ~ FINAL ORDER
Roanoke Countq, Virginia ~
TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OFJonesN& Jones Associates Architects end
WHEREAS, your Petitioner, Medical Properties Associates
did petition the Board of County Supervisors to abandon and
vacate a portion of the Jones Street
right-of-way located on The Southwest Side of the Dwight Hills Snbdlvisioa
and
WHEREAS, after the due legal notice, the Board of County
Supervisors did hold-a public hearing on said request on
February 23, 1988 at the Roanoke County
Administration Center, 3738 erambleton Avenue, Roanoke, Virginia,
at which time all parties in~interest were given an opportunity
to be heard, and
WHEREAS, aftec~full consideration the Board of Roanoke
County Supervisors~is of the opinion that the request should be
approved on February 23, 1988.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDERED, that the 25 foot right-of-way
Jones Street
right-of-way, hereinabove described
on a plat attached
~~~ -J
hereto, be permanently vacated and abandoned. .
BE IT FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this order be
transmitted to the Department of Development and that this order
be recorded by Petitioner along with the attached plat among the
land records of Roanoke County.
McGraw
Adopted on motion of Supervisor
and upon this following recorded vote: ~
Ayes Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
Nays None
Absent
' ' / ~.
Clerk .
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
- 5 -
Director of~ Planning
CC: Rob Stalzer,
John Willey, Real Estate Assessments
Arnold Co-~ey, Director Qf Development Review
1
v
f
VIRGINIA:
BEFnRE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY
p, 0.105 acre parcel of land, )
generally located Jones Street - a )
inning ~t PROFFER
,1 ~ fnnt rinht of wAV beg )
OF
dS~~~i'4x~P~~patarc Creek end xtendi na west
170 feet ~~~~~~~~x~~~ti~i~~~~xac~at ) CONDITIONS
x~~xal~xatgx~atx~sa~kx#~x and 1 ocated i n )
Tna i initibn Mnai~teridl Distri~ - )
~.,
~C~x~~~x~R~~a~kex~oo~~i~~cx~axx~te~x )
N Tp THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY:
z 88 - 5
Being in accord with Sec. 15.1-491.1 et seq. of the Code of Virginia and Sec.
Jones and Jones &
21-10~E of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance, the Petitioner roffers to the
z hereby voluntarily p
z ~iedi c^~1 PrnDer+; cc Accnri ateS
~ Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia the following conditions to the
~ rezoning of the above-referenced parcel of land:
~--
1. The dedication of a 20 foot easement for water and sewer.
0
w
0
a.
a
Respectfully submitted,
r
Petition
- 6 -
A P P E A -: ~:.i ~'.' ~- E R E Q U E S T
PUBLIC HEARING ON
2 88 - 5
I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to
recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so
that I may comment. I agree to follow the guidelines listed
below. WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND
ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD.
1. Each speaker will have between three and five minutes
available whether speaking as an individual or
representative. The chairman will decide the time limit
based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and
will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of
the Board to do otherwise.
2. Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of
view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by
the Chairman.
3. All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between
a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed.
4. Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all
times .
5. Speakers are requested to leave any written statements
and/or comments with the clerk.
6. INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL
FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP
ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM.
P L E A S E W R I T E L E G I B L Y
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
NAME:
~~ ~
TtT~oN~?
ADDRESS : ~?j Z~I' ~ ~ /Yt ~~V ~ ~ ~Lt~ ~~
~W V ~ 2~ ~ /
PHONE : ~ ~3 - 4 337
PLEASE NOTE: (After filling out, give to the Deputy
Clerk. Thank you.)
PETITIONER: BARBARA D. CARTHIRI~T -
CASE NUMBER: 9-2/88
Planning Commission Hearing Date: February 2, 1988
Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: February 23, 1988
1. RE2LTEST
Petition of Barbara D. Cartwright isterialtDis~rict ns of the cul-de-sac on
Ponderosa Circle in the Cave Spring Mag
2. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION
No one in opposition was present at the Planning Cc~rmission Public Hearing.
3. SIGNIFICANT IMPACT FACTORS
a, None.
t}, PROFFERED CONDITIONS
a. None.
N
REASO
5, (~NIl~iISSIONER' S M02ION, VOTE AND
Witt moved to approve the petition. The motion carried with the following
Mr.
roll call vote:
AYES: Jones, Flippen, Witt, Winstead
NAYS: None
ABS~7T; Gordon
6. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE
a. None.
7. ATTACI~4ENTS
Concept Plan (8~" x 11")
Vicinity Map (8~" x 11")
Staff Report
Other:
~~ `~"
Plan ing Commission Alt. Secretary
• ~ POrVDEROSA P,aQK ADD'T.'oh'
L;,:,I.ET L. lT;zSO.~/
.. ~ .~ SQf
gear-1
CAr'E SPR/NG /
~/
1 ~t-
rr: aop
a1~ ,~o
~. J)~/~ l
\ o ~ .w
~,\~°"
F
~ ti
/~
A Ct/E $iR/NG
P~Qpr I.:GN .SLi/ooL
~ OP
~ ~G
Z '
I
~
0
~ONJEROS4
L~/.4L'LE , 3
vTE/~~
OR//E \ ~//ENN FOREST
ELEM. Su/ax
t
` __ P/,~^ 6, i (?~ ' pa:vE / ~'"" h "' '^ - ~ ~ ~ PONDERcSA \ ooy~aoy ~
r5 % \u n A ~ A Z V W AC[ESS I: 'av o r°. ~ 1 ) •
~' ly.g9' -a~'pahp '~~o ?/ a h E9M"/ oas 'O ,LT'Fi A, ~~ y \ PARK ADD~T/ON ~aa.e
'~?• ~ ,y a ~ St5.495oi/ I CI1'' - p <c'c ~ P
~ , Lei 's --- !~'--i55 ~I .ga ~I Y/C/T//TY MAP ti~
E-
•~•~~ d'P 79" ABU/ o !x THE CLERKS OFFICE OF iNE CIRCUIT COllAT
j ~ ~ ' ~\'~ \ ~ c: h / Cf ROANOAE C3:'1!TY. YI'IGINII. TNIS ~LA1 NITX THE
\ ~~ -rgpa4~ ~ ~ ~ ~ / CERTIFICATE OF :CA9DNLEDCEMENT AND DECICAi ION
Z- /A ;' , \ ~ / ~ iHtAEiO AI~NEAEO IS AOMIF~IEO TO RECORD ONE//._
~~ D ' ~" h ~ /S 1971. AT~~ J'CLOCN~ N.
'~ `~ V ~ b, ~ / /
~,~_ ~~ /, ~cMv ~ ' Ex/-S7 /.vR'/'/'/~ / \~~i ~ TESTE ELI'A RETN STOA~
h ~. --- I / oa / 9 er gyn.. _. `t}. ~-~./
~ ~'
V~ , v 8 / \ \ OEPUTT CLEAR
$~_ N75 !%E~ ~ ~ ~ C o ~ I. XENE6Y CERTIFY TXAT THIS PLAT OF SURYEI
a,~ /00.00' ° ~:~/09G?' ~+ ~~ ~ u I ~ I /O IS BR~)•_.G~ ~. _~!~J ~~
errs fiP oa --98.77-'----f a y~.ef' A kG0 ro~ I ~ ( BtocK-2 ~ ~ ~ u- f~.s%
/e'wE.
" ~~ \~.~ ~` ~ ¢N $ i ~ ~.- ~ STATE CERTIf IEO LANG SUAYEYOA
" ~ A50 A~1 3~ Z¢ h~jZ~ `V y 0 ~0 Q
g_. .
,tg=-r?S.d/`" ~A. 9- /SP`[F / / 'APrPGVED:
zi / ,.. `.
~'~ 1/ jTSEC. RTE B97 ~~ A Tp 9T~QKET -~ f / 1 ~i I z
- - y!~,Q/p Tp BE - SECAETAAII RUOAMOAEWCOU~N ~Y PLANNIM6 COMMISSION I DATE
CtlORO ~ Ofd/GITF~ POR ROAD '-
lRIN6 DIST. /Yi0EWN6 PL/RPoSE3 -- ~ _ ~~f.Eyl._' i~~~ ~_.L..`~ - / --/4
_ I cU ~ I-.~-~5?- C-
i51' 11" t 39.96' - - - .AGENT ROAMOAE LITT PLANNING COMMISSION D TE
'S9' 03"t 16.55'
.25' /0"M 159.14'
_1tC 53"N 61.65' -
S9' 01"N 96.52' -
'15' 10"E 127.25'
'I7' S9"E 51. e6'
19' /9"E 71.05'
19' 10"M 259.63'
J7' 12"M 125.08'
O1' 39"^ 151.16'
le' 10"E 311.51' -
11' Ie"E /e.16' "
II' S6"E 121.08' -
O1' S9"E 107.91'
20' I3"E 70. Si'
O1' /9"t 20.11'
10' 90"E 20.11' -
OOUMO AAT COOAJINAI ES
ORIGIN ASSU MED
COA NOAT N EAST
I 1061. 078 1716. 1It
2 1151. 626 /663. 975
.3 ///0. 831- 1616. 319
3A 1566. 895 1331. 000
3e 1690. 325 /IG2. 613
3C 1661. 110 1607. 113
/ /fifi2. 710 /777. 963
5 1123. 76] /fi37. 9/9
6 1693. 317 1911. 161
1 1119. 863 5056. 912
e 1126. 290 51;1. 811
9 1107. 1 JI 1935. 661
IO /100. /67 1996. 313
II /O6E. 690 177.. 592
1 /66/. 07e 1118. 111
e0UM0ART C ONiAI MS 5.1 1
AC 0.E5
A
,.
CITY~EX6I MEEA ROAXOAE. YIAGIMIA - ~ DATE
CAPTION LEGAL REFERENCE
- ~ I_ eEM S. PERDUE AND YIRR IMII M. PERDUE O6 957. P6 335
1. RFYAININi /ORTION DEED DATED FEB I. 1971 OC 993. P6 16
~YAT OF
• BOND ~ROS,~ PARK ADD/T/ON
li' 10E u.1D' S/TU.4TED /N C,4YE SP2/NG MAG/STE.4/AL D/ST
21• u••E ie.ce' _ - . - _ ~ 2Q0.4NOKE COUNT)', ~~4G/N/.4
15' 13"^ 13.79' ~ - _ ~yTy O
57' 11''M 38.36' ~ ~ ?~~4 Fi. ~ O/i/NEQS: ,4/E',QE•,ERT 8, C.~,QTit/,2/Gf'%T ~Q.4QB4,Q4 D. C1'QtW25,yT
17' 21"N 36.71• ,
15' II"t 72. TS L~=1~•~- ~C~ ~ a
~- T ; `T~ ~~m~,.' SCALE: ! e /oo D.ITE AP.2/G /474
a
AND P. T.'S. CERT>Ne~/~'~'2'L~
SENEAT
00173
>~ .
1L' 1 a\~1
BuFaao r. Lu/tirsoE/v ~As.~cia~s
Gear/F/60 L.WO SUQ/EyG7QS
,QGZ[~~rE, Y/~?6W/,4
COMM' 74- 54
L-
~ J, h,~L~{jp ccri c*.a~
,~; .. .6 ..I°. .~,.,.
. ...
2 -
~ONDElZ09A P.QQK
P. B 7 ~riQE Ga
_r
I
/~
[~P/E II B ~
V '
.V
c, 9 ,.,, ~ •T a ~ I
,_
.~
~®.
RDSfL~Ef q~ .fin ~ ,~ -
\M ~ ~f N; trtv+nr"
i~ ? \ \ 4n ~ o P~,°Enn-1
~ ~ :i otD ~~'``
•. ~ , a
M~4 _ ._' ~~ ..
VICINITY MAP
~_____
.;,,
+y .
~~
D
a
anRTN
- 3 -
A k ROANOKE COUNTY Barbara D. Cartwright
' DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT Right-of-lJay Vacation
,_
~~~
STAFF REPORT
CASE NUMBER: 9-2/88
REVIEWED BY: LYNN JOHNSON
PETITIONER: BARBARA D. CARTWRIGHT
DATE: JANUARY 27, 1988
Petition of Barbara D. Cartwright to vacate portions of the cul-de-sac
on Ponderosa Circle in the Cave Spring Magisterial District.
Background: When Ponderosa Park Subdivision was recorded, Ponderosa
Circle terminated with a cul-de-sac affecting block 1, lots 8, 9, and 11.
Ponderosa Park Addition Subdivision was later recorded and showed
Ponderosa Circle extended into the addition with a cul-de-sac affecting
block 1, lots 18, 19, 20, and 21. '
The petitioned=: ~-~cs to vacate those portions of the cul-de-sac outside
of the S0 foot ri~gtit-of-way in Ponderosa Park and revert them to the
adjoining property owners. Those portions sought to be vacated were
never paved or improved.
1. IMPACT ON EXISTING LAND USE
The vacation will not affect the access of any property owner in the
subdivision. The vacated portions of the right-of-way will improve
the property of the adjoining land owners.
2. IMPACT ON FUTURE LAND USE
The vacation will have no effect on the development of the vacant
parcels of land in the subdivision.
3. IMPACT ON UTILITIES
Roanoke County has no utilities in this area, and the Utilities
Department has no objection to the request.
4. OTHER IMPACTS
The vacation will not affect the delivery of fire and rescue
services to the area.
The Virginia Department of Transportation has no objection to the
request. The road is in the state system.
- 4 -
VIRGINIA: '
BEFnP.E THE BOARD OF SL!nF.PVISnR.S OF ROANOKF COUNTY
IN F.E: Turn around area beyond the -)
fifty foot right of way of )
Ponderosa Circle in Ponderosa) R.I;Cn~±1!ENDATION
Park subdivision )
'•YHER.EA Barbara D. Cartwright
did petition the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia, requesting that the turn around area beyond the right
of way of Ponderosa Circle in Ponderosa Park subdivision
be permanently closed and vacated; and
"]3E.°.E'AS, the Planning Commission has given careful
consideration to said petition a.nd to said referral of the
Board of Supervisors and has heard evidence touching the
merits of said permanent closing and vacation of the turn around
area beyond the fifty foot right of way as shown
4n_the plat of Ponderosa Park Addition
~.vhich plat is attached to the petition filed herein.
NO!'/, THERFFORF, B?; IT ??.ESOLVFD and ordered that at the
regular meeting of the Planning Commission of Roanoke County,
Virginia, held on the Ind of February 19 Bg that
the ne*_ition to permanently close and vacate the turn around
area beyond the fifty foot right of way as shown on the
plat, hereinahove set forth, is hereby approved and this
Planning Commission accordingly hereby recommends in
accordance with the provisions of the Code of Virginia to
the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia that
the turn arrn,nd area beyond the fifty foot right of way, as shown on
the plat r~t~~~Cx~dc ponderosa Park Addition attached to the
sari rinn f; 1_ P~ hPrQ;n~_rermanently closed and vacated
v
. t,
and be it further RESnLVEP. that a copy of this resolution r~~/j~ J~"'''''~
be forthwith certified and delivered by the Secretary ~~^"
of this Planning Commission to the Clerk of the Board of
Supervisors of F.oanoke County, Virginia.
The above action was adopted on motion of
Witt _ ; seconded by
and upon the following recorded vote:
AYES: Jones, Flippen, Witt, Winstead
.NAYS: done
ABSENT: Gordon
Roanoke County Planning Commission
VIRGINIA: ~ ~ ~ ~ .-,
BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY
RE: Turn around area beyond the fifty foot ) ~
right of way of Ponderosa Circle in ) FINAL ORDER
Ponderosa Park subdivision ~
TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY:
WHEREAS, your Petitioner,Barbara D. Cartwright
did petition the Board of County Supervisors to abandon and
vacate a portion of the turn around area beyond the fifty_ foot
right-of-way located on Ponderosa Circle in ponderosa Park subdivision
and
00
G1
N
H
Z
W
H
Z
0
U
H
0
W
O
a
a
a
WHEREAS, after the due legal notice, the Board of County
Supervisors did hold a public hearing on said request on
February 23, 1988 -
at the Roanoke County
Administration Center, 3738 Bramble ton Avenue, Roanoke, Virginia,
at which time all parties in interest were given an opportunity
to be heard, and
WHEREAS, after full consideration the Board of Roanoke
County Supervisors is of the opinion that the request should be
granted
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDERED, that the Curn around area beyond
.the y foot right-of-way, hereinabove described
end as shown in red (and cross hatched) on a plat attached
hereto, be permanently vacated and abandoned.
BE IT FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this order be
transmitted to the Department of Development and that this order
be recorded by Petitioner along with the attached plat among the
land records of Roanoke County.
Adopted on motion of Supervisor Robers
and upon this following recorded vote:
~ ,
Aye$_ Supervisor ohnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
Nays None
Absent
Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
- 5 -
CC: Rob Stalzer, Director of Planning
John Willey, Real Estate? Assessments
Arnold Covey., Director of Development Review
p, p P E A R '`_ N C E
PUBLIC HEARING ON ~ ~ ~-/
I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to
recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so
that I may comment. I agree to follow the guidelines listed
below. WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND
ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD.
1. Each speaker will have between three and five minutes
available whether speaking as an individual or
representative. The chairman will decide the time limit
based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and
will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of
the Board to do otherwise.
2. Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of
view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by
the Chairman.
3. All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between
a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed.
4. Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all
times .
5. Speakers are requested to leave any written statements
and/or comments with the clerk.
6. INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL
FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP
ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM.
~~
~~
P L E A S E W R I T E L E G I B L Y
NAME:
~,
~~v~~Y
ADDRESS:
PHONE:
f ~
O~~x 9~
PLEASE NOTE: (After filling out, give to the Deputy
Clerk. Thank you.)
L E G A L N O T I C E
Notice is hereby given to all interested persons that the
Roanoke County Board of-Supervisors will hold a public hearing at their
evening session beginning at 7:00 p.m. on Tuesday, February 23, 1988, in
the Community Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 3738
Brambleton Avenue, S.W., Roanoke, Virginia, on the petition of Barbara
D. Cartwright to vacate portions of the cul-de-sac on Ponderosa Circle
in the Cave Spring Magisterial District.
The County Planning Commission recommends approval.
A copy of the Zoning Ordinance of Roanoke County and amendments
thereto as well as a copy of the petition, site plan, and other
documents related to this request may be examined in the office of the
Department of Planning and Zoning, located in Room 600 of the Roanoke
County Administration Center.
Roanoke County will provide assistance to handicapped persons
desiring to attend public hearings. Such individuals are requested to
contact the County office of Personnel Services ([7031 772-2018) if
special provisions are necessary for attendance.
Given under my hand this 3rd day of February, 1988.
Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
Please publish in the evening edition
of the Roanoke Times and World News on:
February 9, 1988
February 16, 1988
Direct the bill for Publication to:
Bill Terry
Wetherington & Melchionna Attorneys
P.O. Box 90
Roanoke, VA 24002
z ~~ ~ .~
p~TTONgt: UNG HYO CHOI
CASE N(~IBER: 7-2/88
Planning Commission Hearing Date: February 2, 1988
Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: February 23, 1988
1. ~~ST Business to B-2,
Petition of Ung Hyo Choi to rezone a 0.45 acre tract from B-1,
Business to operate a convenience store located at 4533 Brambleton Avenue in the
Windsor Hills Magisterial District.
2. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION ssion Public Hearing.
No one in opposition was present at the Planning Carnni-
3, SIGNIFICANT IMPACT FACTORS
a. Circulation: Access is basicaimitedareAls ut be kuof setbackpo es some
layout, interior circulation is 1 rkin stalls located
problems for Route 221 traffic as vehicles back out of pa g to widen
along the front of the°bfive ~ nes,n thisaproblem could be exacerabated in the
Route 221 from two t is acquired.
future as additional right-of-way
Petitioner proposes to eliminate southerrunost entrance/exit.
4. PROFFERED CONDITIONS ra or portable signs.
a. Will not use tempo. ry undertaking
b. Will not use property for new or used car dealership;
establishment or funeral Name; animaa e°orlnursinglhl~ r ccmnercial, kennel;
clinic, hospital, hospital special c rt servin as a
c. Will maintain the hedge and brush at the rear of the prope Y g
natural buffer with the adjoining residential tract.
d. No billboard advertising will be permitted.
e. Will place two signs on properto~e and heoother on the poleeholdingfthe
of the structure housing the st
signs of the existing businesses.
5, CONIl~QISSIONER' S MOTION, rV0`Ve AtNhDe~~ tion with proffered conditions. 'I~-e mption
Mr. Witt moved to app.
carried with the following roll call vote:
Aye; Jones, Flippen, Witt, Winstead
NAYS: None
p,BSENT: Gordon
6, DISSENTING PEPSP~IVE
a. None.
7. ATTACHMENTS
Concept Plan (8~" x 11")
Vicinity Map (8#" x 11")
Staff Report
Other: - e n ~~~~~ „~
Dalte/ACa-stellaw, Planning Coirn~-ission Alt. Secretary
i s I ~ ~ ~ mro
t- . ~ ~ ;
I ~
j ao a Y O d a i>
r. ~ J d W 1. Ai
~e_ = aa~
's ~-
~ z~9 ~ s3 I ~ sP o °'~
~ ~ = o» ~ n
v ~ ~ F
-- - - -~--- ~ 9 ~
~~~i~~
yy ~a
I dON~. ~HtlHj I ~ ' Q ~ C
S.ryOSdNOFQ O I I '~ i ~ ~ 's =
~JI1Q:SfJQ - ~
IInY
J
I t3R9VLTS:lOH7
I a7SQdOYd I ~l
y1tld3H~ofi4 I a \~ a
I
dOM6B3B'dtl9 a '
I
jrylyd5.3l~CrJ 3 I 1
' ItA1C3=
A
y[Y
• i ~01~a ~ ~
_ ~nv~aia avar+~ ~ I I ; N
r c 9nllsnt'~ I IR ~ „t
7a ;
Y` ~ _ ~
o .o ~ d
3(
+~ u Q ~ 9 ~
~ of ~
a 7 ~
~>4_ ro ~
°oa ~i ~ I z
t: o o J ( ~
K 7 W ',
sg<N ~ o I I ~ <:
. I I ', ~ I F
I I 1 Ee_
F ~ ~ ~~
J ~6
~ I
a I s l ~ ~~~22
y 6 I i oxp
J ~ I ih~
1
1 \ I I 'I
I I-. i
~ ~ ~
II ~ I
~~ i ~ I
1 I~~ II
_ ~~ \ ~ I ~ I III
-a
\ \ ~~
I ~
u.~, i
-----__ I ~ ~,
n
951 71U "~3S VA - _-.y I
~ 3nltia~~~IH Ln~'S-~-- ~
'~
i ~
____-----t- i ~
_--
I i I jj
1 ~, 1
1-L a3n01 I y
Tf W WT 'QL._ifi I I I 1
41~iA1Q'-A '1f1~1,0 AL11'L~HL }
_ 2 -
,~ ~~ ~"
~~~ err ~ (102 "cu,N a19 ;~ _ ~ ~s
• @ 4' E TON U+KE i 4'r 'hh^h ~` . r.
AST~~~'~~; FMy~.im~.w CRESTV/~ VMtK.~ ,~ a '40 ~~t~ ~,
a '~^e.~ ~ V~au1,p
C MiMI~ ~ ~'~-
NOfHM ~ Mc.It _sm~~c ~ c.vr so,~+c ~. R T q~ `~.H~!:,; ~ •.y~qi ` o
~ ~ C
.~
-4 ~k"~~~~~t? 9.,,,~ c~^t+c C~ i667 ~ r/ ~. ETON Nlll w~_R 411)
pow N !yA IZl L., c~o~~L.J
C.,~rc •F ~' S s'
~` r Mrn~ ~ 9`770 d c•
J® i ~ Qr ~, fgYv
' `'~ d ® wns
os ~.•. V ~s ~ t
~~t an ~ ~~ 613 BE}~E~EA~E '~ tM~.:, s~'
r` K~
~~SVnc~;.no c"P ~ 9p ¢; ~ '~, 0 .ey~ucreNtxc •r.,«s.
VI~~I~NITY MAP
D
unRTu
- 3 -
ROANOKE COUNTY Unq Hyo Choi
L DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT R-1 t0 R-2
d Z
``
~.
-Z86'~ 7
STAFF REPORT
PETITIONER: Ung Hyo Choi
CASE NUMBER: 7-2/88 DATE: February 2, 1988
REVIEWED BY: Dale Castellow
Petition of Ung Hyo Choi
Business to B-2, Business
at 4533 Brambleton Avenue
District.
1. NATURE OF REQUEST
to rezone a .45 acre tract from Blocated
to operate a convenience store,
in the Windsor Hills Magisterial
a. Conditional request to rezone .45 acres for the purpose
of converting part of an existing commercial building to
a convenience store.
b. Attached concept plan and zoning vicinity map describe
the project more fully.
2. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS
a. B-2, General Commercial District, permits a wide variety
of commercial and office uses. Petitioner has proffered
conditions which prohibit future developmean undertaking
property as a new or used car dealership;
establishment or funeral home; an animal hospital, clinic
or commercial kennel; or clinic, special care hospital or
nursing home.
b. Commercial entrance permit will be required from VDOT.
3. SITE CHARACTERISTICS
a. Topography: The site is primarily flat with a steep
escarpment along the rear property line which partially
shields the property from neighboring single family
residences.
b. Ground Cover: PredoninVeeetationsanddtreeseis locatedron
buffer of low grow g g
the ridge along the rear property line.
4. AREA CHARACTERISTICS
a. Future Growth Priority:
Hills Community Planning
stable growth.
Situated within the Windsor
Area, it is designated for
b. General area is developed with mixed commercial uses along
Route 221. An eSouthnandaWestlot subdivision abuts the
property to the
- 4 -
a, °`~
5. LAND USE IMPACT ASSESSMENT
Rating: Rate each factor according to the impact of the
proposed action. Use a scale 1 through 5• 3 _ manageable
1 = positive impact, 2 = negligible impact,
impact, 4 = disruptive impact, 5 = severe impact, and N/A =
not applicable.
RATING FACTOR COMMENTS
LAND USE COMPATIBILITY
2 a. Comprehensive Plan: 1985 Comprehensive Development Plan
has placed this area within a Transition land use
category. Petitioner's request is in conformance with
both the land use plan map and applicable policies.
The Transition land use category encourages the
development of institutional, office andnrecentersesThe
clustered or located in a planned shopp g
petitioner's request capitalizes on an existing structure
which contains five retail uses. The structure offers
direct arterial frontage and access and it is located
within the urban service area.
Specifically, the proposal is consistent with policies
TR-8 (enhancing frontage through minimal signage) and
TR-9 (strict screening provisions along the rear of the
property). Since the existing structure clusters five
retail uses onto one site, the proposal is in partial
compliance with policy TR-7 (coordinated site design,
shared access and parking, and limited number of
entrances/exits). The petitioner proposes to eliminate
the southern most entrance/exit point. Lack of available
setback to accommfdont ofhtheebubldinggcould poseesomeking
stalls along the
problem for traffic on Route 221.
2 b. Surrounding Land: Property abuts existing strip
commercial uses, single family residences and Route 221,
a major arterial roadway. Existing topography
effectively screens the property from adjacent
residences.
2 c. Neighboring Area: Strip commercial along Route 221.
3 d. Site Layout: Although access is shared, it is poorly
coordinated because of minimal setback (vehicles backing
out int~1RonuteSharedrparkingais availablenalongrthe
circula
southern end of the property.
3 e. Architecture: Existing structure will not be altered.
2 f. Screening and Landscaping: Petitioner advises that
appropriate steps will be taken to maintain existing
vegetation and trees along the rear property line.
Concept plan larkingslotdlocated atntheasoughernnendhof
front of the p - 5 -
.~~ ~.
the property.
2 g. Amenities: Adequate parking stalls are available.
2 h. Natural features: No negative effect.
TRAFFIC
3 i. Street Capacities: The convenience store will generate
approximately 225 vehicle trips per day. Combined
facilities will generate approximately 322 vehicle trips
per day. Current ADT on Route 221 is approximately
12,910 vehicles.
4 j. Circulation: Access is basically shared, but because of
the existing site layout, interior circulation is limited.
Also, lack of setback poses some problems for Route 221
traffic as vehicles back out of parking stalls located
along the front of the building. Since plans are
currently underway to widen Route 221 from 2 to 5 lanes,
this problem could be exacerbated in the future as
additional right-of-way is acquired.
Petitioner proposes to eliminate southern most
entrance/exit.
UTILITIES
2 k. Water: Adequate supply and distribution.
2 1. Sewer: Adequate.
DRAINAGE
2 m. Basin: Some drainage problems exist, but future expansion
of Route 221 should alleviate these problems. This
proposal will not have any impact on existing drainage.
N/A n. Floodplain:
PUBLIC SERVICES
2 0. Fire Protection: Within established service standard.
2 p. Rescue: Within established service standard.
N/A q. Parks and Recreation:
N/A r. School:
TAX BASE
1
s.- Land and Improvement Value: $131,600 (includes proposed
and existing businesses)
- Taxable Gross Sales/Year: 75,000 (convenience store only)
- Total Employees: 2
- 6 -
~J , -
- Total revenue to the County/Year:(~onveniencelsalesoonly)
ENVIRONMENT
2 t. Air.
2 u. Water:
2 v. Soils:
2 w. Noise:
2 x. Signage: Petitioner has proffered conditions prohibiting
the use of temporary or portable signs.
6. PLAN CONSISTENCY
This area is designated as Transition. The petitioner's
proposal is consistent with the land use plan map ashared
following policies: TR-7 (coordinated site design,
access and parking, and limited number of entrances/exits),
TR-8 (enhancing frontage through minimal signage) and TR-9
(strict screening provisions along the rear of the property)
Since the property is currently utilized as retail, policies
TR-1 (office property preservation) and TR-3 (prevention of
haphazard commercial sprawl) are not applicable.
7. STAFF EVALUATION
a. Strengths: (1) The proposal conforms with applicable
policies in the Future Land Use Guide. (2) Petitronriates
proffered conditions which prohibit several inapp p
uses of the property. (3) Petitioner has proffered
conditions prohibiting the use of temporary and portable
signs. (4) The proposal potentially eliminates an
existing nonconforming use. (5) The proposal offers a
viable use for an underutilized structure.
b. Weaknesses: (1) Primary weakness pertains to traffic
access and circulation. Because of the close proximity of
the parking stalls along the front of the building and
Route 221, veaffect trafficrflowsnalongoRoute 221,parking
spaces could
- 7 -
VIRGirTIA:
BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY
p, .47 acre parcel of land, )
generally located 4533 Brambleton )
Avenue, S.4~'. , Roanoke, Virginia 24018 )
within the ~4indsor Hi11s _ )
Magisterial District, and )
recorded as parcel # 4155815001; )
Tax Map # 86.08-4-11 )
in the Roanoke County Tax Records. )
RD~`ONN~'NIaATION
~ THE ~~pgpgLE SUPERVI SOBS OF RQANOKE COUI~TI'y =
.~. ~'
WHEREAS, your Petitioner Un H Choi tition to rezone the
has filed with the Secretary to the Planning Commission a pe
B-1 District
above-referenced parcel of land from
District for the purpose of ~~~~*'~ r~rt of the premises
to B-2
now occupied by a shoe repair business as a convenience store.
WHEREAS, the petition was referred to the Planning Commission which, after due
legal notice as required by Section 15.1-431 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as
19 88 ;and
amended, did hold a public hearing on February 2
WHEREAS, at that public hearing all parties in interest were afforded an
opportunity to be heard; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due consideroa ~ n has recannended to
the Board of County Supervisors that the rezoning be APP
with conditions
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Cc~mission recomat~nds to the
Board of County Supervisors that the above-referenced parcel of land ~
rezoned to B-2 District.
Witt and upon the
The above action was adopted on motion of
following recorded vote:
py~, Jones, Fl.ippen, Witt, Winstead
NAy~' None
ABSENT:
Gordon
z&~~'- ~
N
VIRGINIA:
gF,FpRE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS~OF ROANOKE COUNTY
p, •47 acre parcel of land, )
generally located 4533 Brambleton )
Avenue, S.H., Roanoke, Virginia 24018 )
within the _Windsor Hi 11 S__ - )
Magisterial District, and )
recorded as parcel # 4155815001; )
Tax Map # 86.08-4-11 )
in the Roanoke County Tax Records. )
FINAL ORDII~
TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF RQANOKE COUN'T'Y:
~~F,AS, your Petitioner Ung Hyo C'noi
~ rcel
H did petition the Board of County Supervisors to rezone the above-referenced pa
z B_2 District
o f rom B-1 District to
v remises now occupied by a shoe repair business
using part of the p
o for t}~e purpose of
H
~ C1 as a convenience store.
w WHEREAS, after due legal notice, the Planning Commission did hold a public
Q '~
a ~ hearing of the petition on Feb~Y 2 , 1988 - at which time, all parties
a rtunit to be heard; and
~ in interest were given an oppo y rvisors determined
WHEREAS, after full consideration, the Board of County Supe
roved with conditions on February 23, 1988.
that the rezoning be APP
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDERED that the aforementioned parcel of land, which is
Tax Ma as Parcel # 86.08-4-11 and recorded
contained in the Roanoke County ps
in Deek Book 1269 Page 1430 and legally described below, be rezoned from
B-2 District.
B-1 District to
- 8 -
Legal Description of Property:
~'
BEGINNING at a point at the intersection of the west
side of U. S. Route No. 221 with the north side of
Virginia Secondary Route No. 906; thence with the west
side of Route No. 221, N. 28° 25' E. 220.1 feet to an
iron; thence with a new line through the J. L. Hoback
property, N. 61° OS' W. 91.4 feet to an iSon29oh03CeW.
with the line of R. R. Thurman property,
224.0 feet to an iron on the north side of Route No.
906; thence with the north side of Route No. 906, S. 63°
27' E. 94.0 feet to the Beginning, and containing 0.47
acre, and being a southerly portion of the J. L. Hoback
property and being as shown on map made by T. P. Parker,
C.E., dated January 24, 1958, a copy of which is 1958,
attached to that certain deed dated February 14,
of record in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court for
the County of Roanoke, Virginia, in Deed Book 596, page
111, conveying said property from J. L. Hoback and wife
to R. G. Arthur; and
BEING the same property conveyed to H. James Hagan and
Bernice M. Hagan, husband and wife, from Charles Lee
Payne, et al., by deed dated March 11, 1982, and
recorded in the aforesaid Clerk s Office in Deed Book
1181, page 1641.
BE IT FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this order be transmitted to the Secretary
of the Planning Commission and that he be directed to reflect that change on the
official zoning map of Roanoke County.
Garrett and upon the
ADOPTED on motion of Supervisor
following recorded vote:
py~; Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
~yS; None
ABSENT:
`~'Z~~~- ~ _, Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
CC: Rob Stalzer, Director of Planning
John Willey, Real Estat~ Assessments
Arnold Covey, Director of Development Review
,~ '""
VIFtGI1JIP,:
BEE~ORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COLT~~
ao
N
reel of ].and. )
p, .47 acre pa
generally located 4533 grambleton )
Avenue, S.W. , goanoke- V~-r'g~-Tlia 24018 )
within the Windsor Hip s - )
Magisterial District, and
reel # 4155815001: )
recorded as pa
Tax Map # 86.08-4-11 )
in the Roanoke County Tax Records. )
P'ROFFF.R
OF
Op~ITIONS
TO THE HON0~2ABZE SUPERVISORS OF RQANOKE ~~:
of the Code of Virginia and Sec.
Being in accord with Sec. 15.1-491.1 et seq.
Ordinance, the Petitioner. Una ~~o Choi
21-105E of the Roanoke County Zoning roffers to the
hereby voluntarily p
f goanoke County, Virginia the following conditions to the
Board of S~rvisors o
rezoning of the above-refereryced Parcel of land:
N
z
w
N
z
0
U
0
H~
0
w
0
a
a
a
1, V;ill not use temporary or portable signs.
2, Will not use property for new or used car dealership; ital,
undertaking establishment or funeral home; animhospital
clinic or commercial kenhome,clinic, hospital,
special care or nursing
e and brush at the rear of. the property
3, Will maintain the hedg
serving as a natural buffer with the adjoining residential
tract.
4, No billboard advertising will be permitted.
ro erty for the convenience
5. Will place two signs on p p
store; one on the face ohetholetholding thessignshof
store and the other on t p
the existing businesses.
Respectfully suhnitted,
gobert A. Ziogas & Darby
Glenn, Flippin, Feldmann
315 Shenandoah Building
P. O. Box 2887
goanoke, Virginia 24001
Counsel for Petitioner
Ung Hyo CYx~i
Peti ner
~.
-Cc~~sel
L E G A L N O T I C E
Notice is hereby given to all interested persons that the
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a pubFebruaryl23,a1988e1in
evening session beginning at 7:00 p.m. on Tuesday,
the Community Room of the Roanoke County Administratetitiontof/Ung3Hyo
Brambleton Avenue, S.W., Roanoke, Virginia, on the P Business of a tract
Choi, requesting rezoning from B-1, Business to B-2,
containing 0.45 acre and located at 4533 Brambleton Avenue in the
Windsor Hills Magisterial District.
Rezoning has been requested to operate a convenience store. The
County Planning Commission recommends approval with proffered
conditions.
A copy of the Zoning Ordinance of Roanoke County and amendments
thereto as well as a copy of the petition, site plan, and other
documents related to this request may be examined in the office of the
Department of Planning and Zoning, located in Room 600 of the Roanoke
County Administration Center.
Roanoke County will provide assistance to handicapped persons
desiring to attend publie ofaPersonneluServicesla[703]a772r2018)tif to
contact the County offic
special provisions are necessary for attendance.
Given under my hand this 3rd day of February, 1988•
Mary H. 11en,~•.Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
Please publish in the evening edition
of the Roanoke Times and World News on:
February 9, 1988
February 16, 1988
Direct the bill for Publication to:
Robert A. Ziogas
Glenn, Flippen, Feldmann, & Darby
1>.O. Box 2887
Roanoke, VA 24001
L E G A L N O T I C E
Notice is hereby given to all interested persons that the
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at their
session beginning at 7:00 p.m. on Tuesday, February 23, 1988, in
373
evening
the Community Room of the Roanoke County Administratetitiontof~Ung Hyo
Brambleton Avenue, S.W., Roanoke, Virginia, on the p
Choi, requesting rezoninglocated at 4533nBrambleBon~AVenueein thea tract
containing 0.45 acre and
Windsor Hills Magisterial District.
Rezoning has been requested to operate a convenience store. The
County Planning Commission recommends approval with proffered
conditions.
A copy of the Zoning Ordinance of Roanoke County and amendments
thereto as well as a copy of the petition, site plan, and other
documents related to this request may be examined in the office of the
Department of Planning and Zoning, located in Room 600 of the Roanoke
County Administration Center.
Roanoke County will provide assistance to handicapped persons
desiring to attend public hearings. Such individuals are requested to
contact the County office of Personnel Services ([7031 772-2018) if
special provisions are necessary for attendance.
Given under my hand this 3rd day of February, 1988.
Mary H. 11en,~Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
Please publish in the evening edition
of the Roanoke Times and World News on:
February 9, 1988
February 16, 1988
Direct the bill for Publication to:
Robert A. Ziogas
Glenn, Flippen, Feldmann, & Darby
P.O. Box 2887
Roanoke, VA 24001
A p P E A R A N C E R E C1 U E S T
C~G. ~ I~C'Zoh~ ~ . ~{'~ ~a.Cre T~~~~ ~rawb~e~~
PUBLIC HEARING ON o
I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to
recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so
that I may comment. I agree to follow the guidelines listed
below. WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND
ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD.
1. Each speaker will have between three and five minutes
available whether speaking as an individual or
representative. The chairman will decide the time limit
based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and
will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of
the Board to do otherwise.
2. Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of
view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by
the Chairman.
3. All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between
a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed.
4. Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all
times .
5. Speakers are requested to leave any written statements
and/or comments with the clerk.
(. INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL
FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP
ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM.
P L E A S E W R I T E L E G I B L Y
NAME: ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ioa S
1
ADDRESS : oX a $ F ~
k~ ~ a o 0
PHONE : 3`}" - 30~
PLEASE NOTE: (After filling out, give to the Deputy
Clerk. Thank you.)
r ~~
PETITIONER: THE HOBART C~ANIFS
CASE Nt~1BER: 11-2/88
Planning Commission Hearing Date: February 2, 1988
Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: February 23, 1988
1. ~T_TEST
Petition of The Hobart Companies Lid. for a Use Not Provided For Permi o
' e s ace, retail space, warehousing and
construct a complex consisting of off P lately
li ht manufacturing, located on the south side of Peters Creek Road immed
g isterial District.
south of Deer Branch Road in the Hollins Mag
2. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION
No one in opposition was present at the Planning Ccmmission Public Hearing.
3, SIGNIFICANT IMPACT FACTORS lam. Parking is located in front rather than
a. Site layout: As per concept p lot landscaping, lighting, and
along sides and rear. Also interior parking
areas for warehousing and light manufacturing are not shown or
l oadi ng to ees exceed available parking space.
specified. Anticipated number of emp y
b. Architecture: Not specified. nt is listed
Virginia, prepared by the Planning
c. Amenities: Residenin R~oekdedCoun Y~ west of proposed deve off. 1 being of
in Historic Sltes
Department in 1979. Sitortance~ Described as a mid late 19th century
greatest historical imp
modified I-form house on large tract of land.
4, PROFFERED CONDITIONS Y lam of Ernie
a. Development will be in su foot buffer adjoining any residentialpproperty.
Rose with a minimum of a 30 uses together
b. Uses to be limited li.htfmanufacturing aseenumerated in 1 t 3, 4, 5, and 6
with warehousing and g
of the M-1 District.
c. Stand-alone sign shall not be greater than 48 sq.ft.
d. The front of the buildings tom t~o~nstructed of brick.
e. No outside storage will be pe from residential areas.
f. Lighting to be shielded and directed away
5, COrMRISSIONER'S MOTION, ~TEoAND ~p~etition with proffered conditions. The motion
Mrs. Flippen moved to app roll call vote:
carried with the follcxaing
pyES; Jones, Flippen. Witt, Winstead
NAYS: None
p,BS~; Gordon
(, DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE
a, None.
7. ATTACEIlKENTS
Concept Plan (8~" x 11")
Vicinity Map (8~" x 11")
Staff Report
Other: ~ /,~Q~~~J~
(l.U. Plannin Co~nission Alt. Secretary
Dale Castellaa, g
z~~
,~
1
i ~
e:
rr
~ ~u1~CC'e~j~ P~
FS~~~~ ,~
~ G i
l~
~ ~ ~ I i ~~,
- 2 -
,
may.-. ~ ... Z
vpp,~t~ ~ vP I15 ~~ D~oTdiO S ~ -
~.(~ANAOWN~~D ,may DOMINION ;JA
3- O U PO;~Q~.".e-aY" ~, }~~~ CT. ~ '" D J~~J~ 11
NN3SLL`"vns~ o;. tiflN NW~I .~'oao,1~\\iL,~!%/MJlr++p~ .'" ,~
,ter : `~' f4 T~ n
~. _,, 4
¢q~ ~OJ PJ 1, yW ,.: P pp~ Ttx~i ~FA~~~ ~PG~,9 °v.
Std r P` " ~ _ T / ;SE ~, ~ 't~44r' ~v M
'PINE NN13 20~ ~ w '/'~ >I°"' ~ y~ :~Z^ ... ~-4jL ~ ~ ~ .~onrw nw,. - - ~. fg
.n ~ sY s, R' o. SUMMERDEAN
O~CN~ DfLPyLPAD y.b `~' . ~' p ~9P V ~ P 9y fr c: .
~~ - ....... gF~~ ^., 4a d~~$UNNYBROOK ~41~p `vP
e ~Tm' ~ N e
s~ S°rrv. ~ SU
.. ~~55__ ~ ~.
9~~0 ~
<. Do- ~n~oaera+ o ILf~AwN ~`~ vi
~ W~I~ ~ NO~TILHILLS ~orW~~GnlOEN9'p
W'' v G
PIYMOUT~i f` Ro v `' ,~,fWc.o"'; pV ~~J
.T '! C CYONIoDUNT~H TN,NOQ EStY ,''i~ PJ
~f''~, ~~~ ®OENT ?~ oN _ P [w.OEN >t~N r<
VICINITY MAP
i~ ~~ ~ 1~•L OP`~1e~
I; /
1. •a /
/ /
0~oyoo ~ ~ \
D\\~P~
~ / ~•~
-, . , ,:. -
9
ca.
D
unQTu
~\ ~
~,
..~., ~ a'Z , - -
/
/
\ -~_, /
\ ~-z O ~ ~~ ``~ /
a-~,, / / ~~ ~' 3 ' ~
o '
~ Is ~
~ \ .wr
C~iew \ ~I -Tt ~ ~ ' 1
`\ ~~, ~ \\ w ,y _ _ ` L7 I
I
\ \ 1\ iCyf
~\ ~, 17 \~ U ~t~ cif ` ' I
~,
_ ,~.. ,
\~
~ ,
~ .-~.
' ~.
~z~
r ~ _
4•
Ia ` ~ as ~.
P s. ~.
6 ~
J
~1 ~, ` J~\
~ IS ~~~
- 3 -
. k` ROANOKE COUNTY The Hobart Companies Ltd.
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT Use Not Provided For Permit
d 2
~~
STAFF REPORT
CASE NUMBER: 11-2-88 PETITIONER: The Hobart Companies, Ltd.
REVIEWED BY: Jon Hartley DATE: January 25, 1985
Petition of The Hobart Companies, Ltd. for a Use Not Provided For Permit
to construct a complex consisting of office space, retail space,
warehousing and light manufacturing on a 4.9 acre parcel located on the
south side of Peters Creek Road immediately south of Deer Branch Road in
the Hollins Magisterial District
1. NATURE OF REQUEST
a. Petitioner is requesting a Use Not Provided For Permit to develop
a mixed use development in a B-2 General Commercial District and
R-1, Residential District and has proffered as a condition that
the uses would be limited to offices, retail sales, warehousing,
and light manufacturing as allowed in the M-1 district.
Petitioner has also proffered that development will occur in
substantial conformity with the concept plan.
b. Attached concept plan and zoning vicinity map describe project
more fully.
2. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS
a. Section 21-102-5 states that an application for a Use Not Provided
For Permit can be made to the County "if, in any district, a use
is not specifically permitted".
b. The Light Manufacturing M-1 District permits a variety of uses
including assembly of electronic equipment, automotive body shops,
and manufacture, processing or packaging of a variety of
non-durable goods. (See attachment listing of permitted uses.)
c. Site plan review will be required to insure conformity with County
regulations
d. VDOT commercial entrance permit will be required.
3. SITE CHARACTERISTICS
a. Topography: Gently sloping towards Deer Branch.
b. Ground Cover: Open fields and light brush.
4. AREA CHARACTERISTICS
a. Future Growth Priority:
Community Planning Area.
currently receiving urban
b. General area is primarily
general and service retai
Situated within the Peters Creek
Designated as a high growth area,
services.
developed with office, institutional,
1 uses, and low density residential.
- 4 -
~z~' - 8
5. LAND USE IMPACT ASSESSMENT to the impact of the proposed
Rating: Rate each factor according
action. Use a scale of 1 through 5• 3 = manageable impact, 4 =
1 = positive impact, 2 = negligible impact, licable.
disruptive impact, 5 = severe impact, and N/A = not app
COMMENTS
RATING FACTOR
LAND USE COMPATIBILITY
Petitioner's
3 a. Comprehensive Plan: 1985Coreplandnuseecategory ent Plan a.cies
placed this area within a and the poll
request is consistent with the lCn2 usarPerialahighway access, C-4
related to site design. Policy
- coordinated commercial site design, and C-5 - effective
screening and buffering alongtionedentpolicymCelcencouragessmixed
well provided for by the pet or light
use development, but makes no mention of warehousing
manufacturing.
b. Surrounding Land: Surrounding land is institutional, commercial,
3
and low density residential.
c. Neighboring Area: Neighboring area is predominately commercial
2
and institutional, with some low density residentia .
4 d. Site Layout: As per concept plan•Alsorinteriorlparkingllotront
rather than along sides and rear areas for warehousing and light
landscaping, lighting, and loading
manufacturing are not shown or specsfaces, Anticipated number of
employees exceed available parking P
4 e. Architecture: Not specified.
2 f. Screening and Landscaping: ~As required by the Ordinance.
4 g. Amenities: Residence located directly west of proposed
development is listedthe Planning Departmentoino197gounsi~e
Viry a prepared by 1 being of greatest
received a grade 4 on a scale of 1 to 5,
historical importance.onDlargebtract ofmlandate 19th century
modified I-form house
2 h. Natural Amenities: No negative effect.
TRAFFIC office and light
3 i. Street Capacities: Distributing retail, the
manufacturing activities between the proposed three buildings,
staff estimates that this PrIne1986otheretweret24,610 oADT on thi;
vehicle trip ends per day.
section of Peters Creek Road.1mlrovedection of Peters Creek Roa
and Williamson Road recently P
- 5 -
,~ ~'
Circulation: Site is well served by existing arterial highways.
3 j•
Access is provided at tDe tO1has~recommended that thearightlturn
property. Engineering P
lane be extended for tccommodatelright turningft~affic.on Alsors
Creek Road to better a
staff has suggested that the .western entrance should be combine
with the entrance to the existing residence to reduce the number
of access points .
UTILITIES
3 k. Water Necessary water service would have to be provided by
extending an 8 inch water line located west of the site.
Extension would be at developer's expense.
2 1. Sewer: Public sewer.
DRAINAGE
3 m. Basin: Tinker CreekaffDsungestsmstormwaterhdetentioneberprovided
past rain~_storms. St g
with 10 year detention and 2 year release.
3 n. Floodplain: Site plan wile foreDeer1BranchepuosuantrtolCounty
and 100 year flood elevatio
ordinance.
PUBLIC SERVICES
2 0. Fire Protection: Within established service area.
2 p. Rescue: Within established service area.
N/A q. Parks and Recreation:
N/A r. Schools:
TAX BASE
1 s, - Land and Improvement Value: $2,822,000
- Taxable Gross Sales/Year: Not Available
- Total Employees: 200
- Total Revenue to the County/Year: ValueaOnly P$32e453t
ENVIRONMENT
2 t. Air:
2 u. Water:
2 v. Soils:
2 w. Noise:
2 x. Signage: Petitioner has proffered that stand alone sign will not
exceed 48 square feet.
- 6 -
.~i ""
6• PLAN CONSISTENCY
This area is designated asrelatedntolsitendesigntwithintthisalandsubut
plan map and the policies
category. Mixed use development is areonotgencouragedalandeuseetypes.
warehousing and light manufacturing
7• STAFF EVALUATION
a. Strengths• (1) Positive effect on tax basewith siteldesign
employment opportunities. (2) Consistency
policies contained within the Land Use Plan. (3) Petitioner has
proffered uses, concept plan and signage.
b, Weaknesses• (1) Core designation does not encourRangelofer
warehousing or light industrial activities. (2defined to avoid
industrial uses proposed could be more narrowly Traffic
more obtrusive uses permitted in an M-1 distextending3the right
safety and circulation could be improved by potential
turn lane.; and reducing number of access points. (4)
negative impact on recognized historic site.
- 7 -
M
N
N
z
w
H
2
0
U
O
H
A
W
0
a
a
a
OSTERHDUDT, FERGUSD
NATT, AHERGN & AGE!
ATTD RN EYS-AT-LA'N
RDANDKE, VIRGINIA
24018-tfi99
VIRGINIA:
BEFORE_THE_BOARD_OF_COUNTY SUPERVISORS OF_ROANOKE_COUNTY
IN RE: ) FINAL ORDER
A 4.974 acre parcel of land,
generally located in the 6600 Block )
on the South side of Peters Creek )
Road, within the Catawba Magisterial )
District, and recorded as a portion )
of Parcel #27.14-2-12 ann theoRoanoke )
of Parcel #27.14-2-13, )
County Tax Records
TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY:
WHEREAS, your Petitioner, THE HOBART COMPANIES,
LTD., did petition the Board of County Supervisors for a
"use not provided for" for the above-referenced parcel of
land from B-2, General Commercial District and R-1,
Residential District, pursuant to the Roanoke County Zoning
Ordinances, for the purpose of the development of office,
retail, service industry uses, warehousing and limited light
manufacturing.
WHEREAS, after due legal notice, the Planning
Commission did hold a public hearing of the petition on
January 5, 1988, at which tine, all parties in interest were
given an opportunity to be heard; and
WHEREAS, after full consideration, the Board of
County Supervisors determined that the "use not provided
~ 1988.
• for" be granted. on February 23,
_ 8
z~~-~
^STERHOU~T, FERGU50
NATT, AHER~N & AGEI
ATT^ R N EYS-AT-LA'N
ROANOKE, VIRGINIA
24018-tfi99
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDERED that the aforementioned
parcel of land, which is contained in the Roanoke County Tax
Maps as Parcel a portion of Parcel #27.14-2-12 and a portion
of Parcel #27.14-2-13 'and legally described below, be
granted a "use not provided for."
A 4.974 acre parcel of land, generally
located in the 6600 Block on the South
side of Peters Creek Road, within the
Catawba Ma on of 'PalrcDe'Ist#27 tl 4 a2 ~I 2 eanddad
as a po in the
portion of Parcel #27.14-2-13,
Roanoke County Tax Records
with the following conditions:
(~) Development will be in substantial conformity
with the site plan of Ernie Rose, Inc., with a minimum of a
30 foot buffer adjoining any residential property.
(2) Uses to be limited to: office, retail sales,
service industry uses together with warehousing and light
manufacturing as allowed in Section 21-24-I, M-1, Light
Industrial District, (A) (1), (3), (4), (5) and (6) of the
Roanoke County Code.
(3) Stand-alone sign shall not be greater than 48
square feet.
(4) There shall be no outside storage of materials.
(5) All lighting shall be directed away from the
adjoining residential property.
a (6) All building shall be constructed with brick
on the front thereof.
- 9 -
~~
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this order
be transmitted to the Secretary of the Planning Commission
and that he be directed to reflect that change on the
Official Zoning Map of Roanoke County.
ADOPTED on notion of Supervisor __ Johnson _______•
_ and upon the
seconded by Supervisor _ Nickens_______ •
following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYES: None
ABSENT:
Deput~rk, Roanoke County
Board of Supervisors
r1.e15e.c
CC: Rob Stalzer, Director of Planning
John Willey- Real Estate Assessments
Arnold Covey, Director of Development Review
OSTERHOLIOT, FERGlJ50'.
NATT, AHERON & AGEI
ATT 0 R N EY S-AT-LA'N
R~ANOKE, VIRGINIA
24018-tfi99
- 10 -
~~
VIRGINIA:
SUPERVISORS OF_ROANOKE_COUNTY
COUNTY
OF
BOARD
THE
_
_
_
_
BEFORE
) PROFFER OF
IN RE: ) CONDITIONS
A 4.974 acre parcel of land,
cated in the 6600 Block )
l
o
generally
on the South side of Peters Creek )
l )
within the Hollins Magisteria
Road
)
,
District, and recorded as a portion
of Parcel #27.14-2-12 ann theoRoanoke )
of Parcel #27.14-2-13, )
County Tax Records
~ TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY:
`r' Being in accord with Sec. 15.1-491.1 et seq. of
N de of Virginia and Sec. 21-105 of the Roanoke County
C
o
the
Zoning Ordinance, the Petitioner, THE HOBART COMPANIES,
hereby voluntarily proffers to the Board of
H
z
w p,
LT ,
the following
f Roanoke County, Virginia,
H Supervisors o
0
U
of the above-referenced parce o
i
ng
conditions to the rezon
o
H
~
Q land.
Development will be in substantial conformity
(~)
0
a
ith the site plan of Ernie Rose, Inc., with a minimum of a
~ w
30 foot buffer adjoining any residential property.
(2) Uses to be limited to: office, retail sales,
e industry uses together with warehousing and light
i
c
serv
allowed in Section 21-24-I, M-1, Light
manufacturing as
Industrial District, (A)(1), (3), (4), (5) and (6) of the
Roanoke County Code.
(3) Stand-alone sign shall not be greater than
OSTERHOIIDT, FERGLISON 4 $ square f ee t .
o
NATT, AHERON & AGEE
L4) There shal t be no outside storage
ATTORNEYS-AT-LAW (
RDANOKE, VIRGINIA
24018-1699
materials.
- 11 -
"'
~5) All bighting shat"I be directed away from the
adjoining residential property.
(6) All building shall be constructed with brick
on the front thereof.
Respectfully submitted,
THE HOBART COMPANIES, LTD.
By_~_ ~,~_G I~ ~_-----
Of Counsel
Edward A. Natt, Esquire
Osterhoudt, Ferguson, Natt,
Aheron ~ Agee, P.C.
1919 Electric Road, S.W.
Roanoke, VA 24018
Counsel fo"r Petitioner
p6.e15c.c
OSTERHDUDT, FERGUSD
NATT, AHERDN & AGE'.
ATTORNEYS-AT-LA'N
RDANDKE, VIRGINIA
24018-1fi99
- 12 -
1
USTERNOUOT, FERGUSO
NATT, ANERON & AGE'
ATT 0 R N EY S-AT- LA'N
ROANOKE, VIRGINIA
24618-1699
VIRGINIA: ~ .
BEFORE THE_BOARD_OF_COUNTY_SUPERVISORS OF_ROANOKE_COUNTY
IN RE: ) RECOMMENDATION
arcel of land, )
A 4.974 acre p
generally located in the 6600 Block )
on the South side of Peters Creek )
Road, within the Catawba Magisterial )
District, and recorded as a portion )
of Parcel #27.14-2-12 ann theoRoanoke )
of Parcel #27.14-2-13, )
County Tax Records
TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY:
WHEREAS, your Petitioner, THE HOBART COMPANIES,
LTD., has filed with the Secretary to the Planning
Connission a petition to grant a "use not provided for" on
the above-referenced parcel of land from B-2, General
Commercial District and R-1, Residential District for the
purpose of the development of office, retail, service
industry uses, warehousing and limited light manufacturing.
WHEREAS, the petition was referred to the Planning
Connission which, after due legal notice as required by
Section 15.1-431 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as
amended, did hold a public hearing on January 5, 1988; and
WHEREAS, at that public hearing all parties in
interest were afforded an opportunity to be heard; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Connission, after due con-
sideration has recommended to the Board of County Supervisors
V rovided for" be granted with the following
that the "use not p
conditions:
(1) Development will be in substantial conformity
with the site plan of Ernie Rose, Inc., with a minimum of a
30 foot buffer adjoining any residential property.
(2) Uses to be limited to: office, retail sales,
service industry uses together with warehousing and light
manufacturing as allowed in Section 21-24-I, M-1, Light
Industrial District, (A)(1), (3), (4), (5) and (6) of the
Roanoke County Code.
(3) Stand-alone sign shall not be greater than 48
square feet.
(4) There shall be no outside storage of materials.
(5) All lighting shall be directed away from the
adjoining residential property.
(6) All building shall be constructed with brick
on the front thereof.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning
Commission recommends to the Board of County Supervisors
that the above-referenced parcel of land be granted a "use
not provided for," subject to the proferred conditions. The
above action was adopted on notion of Ms. Flippen, and upon
the following recorded vote:
AYES: Ms. Flippen, Mr. Winstead, Mr. Jones, Mr. Witt
NAYS:
ABSENT: Mr. Gordon
OSTERHOUDT, FERGUSDI
NATT. AHERON & AGES
ATTORNEYS-AT-LA'N
ROANDKE, VIRGINIA
2401 EI-1699
r1.e15d.c
2
LEGAL NOTICE
OBTERHDUDT, FERGUSDN
MATT, AHERON & AGEE
ATTORNEYS-AT-LAN
ROANOKE, VIRGINIA
24 018-16 9 9
Notice is hereby given to all interested persons
that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia,
will hold a public hearing at 7:00 p. n., at the Roanoke
County Administrative Center, at 3738 Branbleton Avenue,
Roanoke, Virginia, on February 23, 1988, on the petition of
THE HOBART COMPANIES, LTD. to grant "a use not provided
for"with certain conditions for a 4.974 acre parcel of land,
generally located in the 6600 Block on the South side of
Peters Creek Road, within the Catawba Magisterial District,
and recorded as a portion of Parcel #27.14-2-12 and a
portion of Parcel #27.14-2-13, in the Roanoke County Tax
Records, from the existing B-2, General Commercial District
and R-1, Residential District, pursuant to the provisions of
the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance, said parcel of land
being Wore particularly described as follows:
A 4.974 acre parcel of land, generally
located in the 6600 Block on the South
side of Peters Creek Road, within the
Catawba Magisterial District, and recorded
as a portion of Parcel #27.14-2-12 and a
portion of Parcel #27.14-2-13, in the
Roanoke County Tax Records
A copy of the Zoning Ordinance of Roanoke County
and a nendnents thereto as we I 1 as a copy of the petition,
site plan, and other documents related to this request nay
be examined in the office of the Department of Development,
located in Roon 600 at Roanoke County Administrative Center,
3738 Branbleton Avenue, Roanoke, Virginia.
Roanoke County will provide assistance to
handicapped persons desiring to attend public hearings.
Such individuals are request d to contact the County office
of Personnel Services (703) 772-2018) if special provisions
are necessary for attendance.
Given unde r ny ha d th i s 3!t~day o f ~~~-!?-~-~~
Q9TERHOUOT, FERGUSON
MATT, AHERON 6 AGEE
ATTORNEYS-AT-LAM
ROANOKE, VIRGINIA
24018-1699
198
y-y~ ------ ~ -------
~~ Q -N ~}~l.~h Clerk
r
Board of S pervisors of Roanoke County
Please publish in the eveni g edition1988Thh andaTuesdaynes-
World News on Tuesday, Fe ruary 9,
February 16, 1988. Please i I I cost of the pPblOicatli919 to
Osterhoudt, Ferguson, Natt Aheron 6 Agee,
Electric Road, S.W., Roanok Virginia 24018.
2
STAFF REPORT
ASE NUMBER- SE2-2/88 PETITIONER: Dominio1988nkshares
C - DATE: February 22.
REVIEWED BY: Dale Castellow
Petition of Dominion Bankshares ffiperonlan 8461 acreltract oad
Exception Permit to operate an ort R
Industrial zoning district, located at 5673 Airp
an M-1,
in the Hollins Magisterial District.
1. NATURE OF REQUEST royal to convert an
a, p,pplicant desires Special Exception app Stone Printing)
existing industrial structure (formerly
a proximately 49,250 ,square feet in size to commercial
p ur ose of operating Dominion
office space for the p P
Bankshares Services Corporatio atedeintRoanokepCountynon
This operation is currently
Plantation Road. describe the
lan and zoning vicinity map
b, Attached concept p
project more fully.
2. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS ermits a wide variety of
a. The M-1, Industrial District P uses. Additional uses,
light industrial and manufacturing General Commercial
such as those permitted in the B-2, ecial
District are also permitted upon issuance of a Sp
Exception permit by the Board of Supervisors.
b. VDOT has no objection to this petition.
c, Site plan review will be required to ensure conformity
with County regulations.
3. SITE CHARACTERISTICS
The site is gently rolling and sloped towar s
a, Topography:
Airport Road.
b. Ground Cover: Predominantly grass, asphalt and mature
landscaping.
4. AREA CHARACTERISTICS Situated within the Peters Creek
a, Future Growth Priority: the area is designated for
Community Planning Area, urban services.
stimulated growth. The site is served by
General area is developed with a combination of general
b• and light industrial (warehousing)
office, commercial,
uses.
5. LAND USE IMPACT ASSESSMENT to the impact of the
Rating: Rate each factor according
proposed action. Use a scale 1 through 53 = manageable_ not
1 = positive impact, 2 = negligible impact, and N/A
impact, 4 = disruptive impact, 5 = severe impact,
applicable.
~:.r';
RATING FACTOR
COMMENTS
LAND USE COMPATIBILITY
3 a. Comprehensive Plan: 198hinoapDevelopmenDelandpuset P an
_ has placed this area wit
category. The Land Use Plan identifies offices as a
moderately compatible use in the Development land existing
category. The petitioner proposes to toiserveaas the
structure (formerly Stone s Printing)
operations center for the company's credit card operation.
2 b. Surrounding Land: Property abuts Blue Ridge Memorial
_ Gardens and existing office, commercial, and multi-family
residential uses.
area is primarily general
2 c. Neighboring Area: Neighboring
office with assorted commesingleaandlmultilfamilylal uses
along Airport Road. $Ot ust east of the site.
residential uses are located j
2 d. Site Layout• Existing parking is located to the rear of
the building along the east (rear) property line.
ro oses to construct an additional parking
Petitioner p P line adjacent to
facility along the northwest property arking
Blue Ridge Memorial Gardens. All total, 210 p
spaces are proposed.
N/A e. Architecture: Building exterior will not be modified.
3 f. Screening and Landscaping: A natural buffer of mature
trees and undergrowth is located along the northwest
roperty line. The buffer providemorialxGardens.scThen
P
between the site and Blue Ridge
petitioner proposes to ealongabothcthelreardlotlline. An.
screening and buffering is proposed
additional 230 feet of fenceline betweennthe site and
along the southern property Collectively, the
Shenandoah Homes Retirement Villageshould serve to screen
additional screening and buffering
the site from abutting residential uses to the rear of the
site.
2 g. Amenities: Adequate parking available.
2 h. Natural features: The site is well screened by a natural
buffer of mature trees and undergrowth along both the
northwest and .southeastern property lines.
TRAFFIC
to the Institute of Traffic
3 i. Street Capacities: According ro osed facility
Engineer's Tri Generation Man555~trip ends per day.
should generate approximately
However, it is the staffss sPnceothehoperation willfnot be
volumes will somewhat le
customer oriented. The operations center will not serve
- 2 -
z8~_
the public as a retacl enerationewouldlbealimitedltoty•
Consequently, traffi g Current ADT
Dominion Bank employees and stock10e900evehicles.
on Airport Road is approximately
3 j. Circulation: The site is well designed to acsetbackttothe
proposed use. The building is offvehiclesyentering and
allow for peak hour "stacking" dock is
exiting from the site. An existing loading
located on the site to acin~facilitiesvareelocatedsatnthe
as well as proposed, park g
rear of the property and well screened from Airport Road.
UTILITIES
2 k. Water: Adequate supply and distribution.
2 1. Sewer: Adequate.
DRAINAGE
3 m. Basin: An existing stormwater detention facility is
located on site. Silitplis adequatelto accommodate the
ensure that the fac Y
proposed use.
N/A n. Floodplain:
PUBLIC SERVICES
4 0. Fire Protection: To enh~ion ofranpadditional fireshydrant
recommends the construc the closest hydrant is
near the site. Currently,
approximately 2,000 feet from the site.
2 p. Rescue: Within established service standard.
N/A q. Parks and Recreation:
N/A r. School:
TAX BASE
s. - Land and Improvement Value: $1,354,600
- Taxable Gross Sales/Year: N/A
- Total Employees: 150
- Total revenue to ..the County/Year: *4existing*structure
on County tax roll
ENVIRONMENT
2 t. Air:
2 u. Water:
2 v. Soils:
- 3 -
2
w. Noise:
x. Signage: The petitioner ProPas5s4~owouldtbewlocated on the
site. One sign (see attache and would be
approximately 45 feet north of the driveway
set back 20 feet from Aireettin°saZe.ThAsSecond sign (see
approximately 55 square f
attached 5:11) would be attached to the building Thas sign
located near the main e4tsquaretfeeteinusizenand would not
would be approximately
be visible from Airport Road.
3
6. PLAN CONSISTENCY etitioner's
This area is designated as Developmentcompatible use within
request is identified as a moderatelThe site fronts directly
the Development land use category.
on a primary thoroughfare and is within the urban service
area.
7. STAFF EVALUATION
a. Strengths: (1) Petitioner PtePdesignoistapproPriatelforng
vacant building. (2) The s
the proposed use. The petitioner has proposed screening
and buffering improvements which would improve the rotosal
compatibility with the neighboring areas. (3) Thep P
also provides an effective RoanokenCountyessfastest of
space confronted by one of
growing corporations.
b. Weaknesses: (1) The site is approximately 2,000 feet from
the nearest fire hydrant.
8. RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAthe following condition is
In considering this application,
lication is approved:
suggested if the app
a. Signage should be limited to the 60 square feet proposed
in the application.
- 4 -
f'
1
F
\` 1
I I
i(
I l;
~ i/,~
r I 1~ ''
~- ~c~'
x--~->~
i ~ ~ ~11 i
~,~ a1" .
~'~~~,, -
I ~ //
i- A /
~"'~ ~,
S'"~~
/
I /
,.t
0 1 ~ ~
I
~~~'
~~/
N
~ ~ i i _-
~' J /
! / / / /
1 I I i ill ~ ~~ j i ~I 1 ~ i' i /~/ ~~ / i ~ c~.Y
1 I I 1 II~1 ~ _~ 1 ~ i / / / / / / /
1 1 1 II ~a i / i / i ~ ~ / / ~ /
/ 1 Ij ll~ ~-i ~~./ i ~i I i ~ / i
II 1
~;?
~~ ~~~
oo^~L
J'
i z I
A
y~
i I
z
~~ 1
N If
~F
C4
t
~~
0
A
3
D~
N
s
t
.^. ?
~°
z~
A
1
11 u~ ~~ ~- , I ,
1 1 ; 1114-~ = ~---i , ,
; ~I~ ; , , , • , -
; , , ,
° / /
~
~
~ !/ j / /
E~ i ~ - --~ ~ i i
! /i ~ ~ 1 ~0
1 % i / ~
~~ ` 1 I /
- ~-l 1` I 1 i ~
~ ,
l
\
i ! i! ~ ~
c
j! I Of y ~. `
~
i ` ~
~~ ~ ~ 1 1
,~
,!, ;'
11 /
11 / ~i'
!, `
~I ~ ~1
„~
/ ~~ ~~ ~
~ ~`~;\
~ - ~~~ ; ~
1
! -
i ~
/ ~, - \
4 ~ i ~~
~, L ,~
c `
\ ~
R_ ~
Ip
`~~ ~ ~ ,\
a~
~~~Q
~~~
~° ~'
~"~
~; ~~o~ 4~
~vi'~-o
s. ~~.~~
~~
'f
~ ~' `<
^
i
L
a
0
s
! 1 /
~ 1~
V n
i (` y
/ A J
1) ' A
jpF ~
L 4
1
I ~ 1
J o ~.
0
/ ~
/ ~
~ I
I
/ / I
i ~~ I I
i ~~ \ I ~
~ ~~ `\
` \~\
% % ~~
~ m
s
e D
8
I, 1'
F
`~C
s
9 :I
1
1 1 '
~ I
. ,
l
a
I
I
~a
i
1 1
1 ~~
1 0
1 ` n
~ ~ I b
\_ -..
i / ~~ ~ ^ ~ 1
i / ~ / r~
i
F zo•
_- - O
-
i ~\\ _
~ ~\` ~ ~ -
__ 1 i
~ ~ i
I I 1 ?n
I I I 1 / ":
1 ~ ! ~J
QI ! P
~ '+ 1 / ~,
z
`\ aV I 7
~ /k 1 !I
\~~~~~~~~~~-I
c J ~
- 5 -
`°~• DOMINION BANKSHARES SERVICES, INC.
f
L ,; o, ~ i. ~ ! ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ! 5673 AIRPORT ROAD
A .+. ; ~; `~ i L~ ~ ": ~ ~ t ROANOKE, VIRG{NIA 24019
i =S
s "> a r
g i Y ~ !
s
i
a
q
I'il.
Q
~~
"o?
za
uv
7~,
J~
~rQ4
.p
~~ d'
I~
Sign T.; p; F:.'Nonument
The 1 1 ' internally illuminated Type E monument s-gn
possesses the same size sign face as sign Type D but
with the addition of full width cladding. Its low profile,
vertically oriented design is recommended for locations ~ ~~
requiring smaller signage due to code restrictions,
architectural scale, dense tree foliage or community
atmosphere.
All features, color and location criteria discussed with
regard to the Type A pylon apply here as well. In addition,
when located near the bank dnve-up entry, a single line
directional legend maybe applied as shown. All materials
used for construction of Types D and E are identical to
those of Types B and C.
For locations where ambient light is insufficient for
proper illumination, a system of ground flood lights has
been developed and should be used where necessary. If
this is not possible, and other external illumination
options are not available, an internally illuminated
corporate symbol may be incorporated into this sign.
~•
Type E (Side Elevation)
Type FrlFront Elevation)
Sign Type MI Entiyµ'ay Plaque
The Type M Entryway Plaque should be used only as a
signage reinforcement tool when the freestanding sign is
remotely located. It is not intended to serve as the primary
identifier-rather it should be used to reinforce the
corporate signature at the entryway area. The only
exception would be an office located in the interior of an
office building where a small wall attached plaque is the
only allowable identification.
The plaques are 1" thick and are constructed of/z" thick
acrylic plastic. They are attached to the wall with metal
studs into holes filled with adhesive.
zi9ne
The plaques are offered in three color combinations:
l . Dominion Red Plaque with White silkscreened
corporate signature
2. Dominion Light Grey Plaque with Dominion Red
silkscreened corporate signature
3. Dominion Dark Grey Plaque with White silkscreened
corporate signature
The choice of when to use an Entryway Plaque should
be influenced by the amount of available wall space,
architectural entryway features, and need for signature
reinforcement. The finish choice should be dictated by
the wall finish and whether or not a strong visual impact
is needed.
For locations where entryway identification is needed
but only window glass surrounds the entry, the Glass
Mount Plaque should be used. Similar in proportion to
the Entryway Plaque, the Glass Mount Plaque is
constructed of '/a" thick acrylic plastic and adheres
to the glass with silicone adhesive. ~ ~~
F 1 L;- S
T~~pe M
~`~.
i _ 7
~,
z~
~y~n~sr"~ ~ rs~~ ~r °'r~`~HILL go `~irtR ~ ~$ -~f
(~~ ~ K-MANi~ .. v V ~~ _
..,..~..••, ~~VICINITY MAP
-s-
A ~~ ROANOKE COUNTY Dominion Bankshares Corporation
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT Special Exception>- Office in M-1
L~7GAL rpTICE OF A RDG[JI~AR SING OF TIC RQANOKE COLT~M BOARD OF SUPIIZVISORS
rsons that the Roanoke County Board of
Notice is hereby given to all interested pe 23, 1988, at
at 7 p.n-. on Tuesday, February
Supervisors will hold a public hearing in Roanoke,
the Roanoke County Administration Center, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, SW,
inia to hear the following requests:
Virg ration for a Special Exception Permit to
1. Petition of Dominion Bankshares Corpo Industrial zoning
operate an office on an 8.461 acre tra the Holl ns Magisterial District.
district, located at 5673 Airport Road in
ans and ordinances are available for inspection in the Depaa tmeR~noke
All pl
Planning and Zoning, Room 600, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, Roanoke, Virg
to attend public
ed ersons desiring
County will provide assistance to handicapp p office of Personnel
hearings. Such individuals are r~uested to contact the County
Services 703/772-2018 if special provisions are needed for attendance.
Given under my hand this 29th day of January, 1988•
mil'? c~-u-~-- .~
Mary Allen, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
pl~Se publish: Evening Edition
Roanoke Times & World-News
February 9, 1988
February 16, 1988
Please bill: County of Roanoke
Department of Planning & Zoning
P.O. Box 29800
Roanoke, VA 24018-0798
Item '~'` <
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOOKE COUNTYEADMINISTRATIONNOCENTER
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROAAN/ ON TUESDAY,
IN ROANOKE,
MEETING DATE: February 23, 1988
Easement
SUBJECT:
Vacation and relocation of 20-foot Drainage ~~
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR' COMNIENTS:~
.~
/ a~~~~-S
~~~~,~yyc.c -nom
UMMARY OF INFORMATION:
%a~"~~~
.~~ ~~~
^~Q
~'Vl-~''p~J ..C.C~,2~iVM.G
S Bowles has
ment Corporation, Inc. and Kenneth G.
Akfer Develoetition to permanently vacate and relocate a 20 foot
submitted a P traverse lots 2, 3, and 4, block 2, section 6,
drainage easement,
Falling Creek Estates.
the first being
The request for ofcathousesonolotv4rwhich encroaches into the
the construction the second being that the relocation and
existing easement;
construction of the new ditch and easement will enhance t e use
and development of lots 2 and 3.
ivision of Engineering is in agreeme er WstEngineer ontthe
The D working with the Develop
and is presently
construction plans.
FISCAL IMPACT: None
RECOMMENDATION:
The staff recommends approval of the Final Order.
SUBMITTED BY:
Arnold Covey
1 ment Review Di ector
ppPROVED
u~ /
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
Deve op
----------------
--------------------- VOTE
--- ACTION No Yes Abs
Approved ( ) Motion by: Garrett
Denied ( ) Johnson
Received ( ) McGraw
Referred Nickens
To Robers
Attachment
r
EXHIBIT A
The hollow shown hereon ie the same as ehovn on record map o
Because o! grading opecationa
[alling Creek Bstatas, Section 6.
during construction oL houses the hollow has bean Lilled. The new
15 loot drainage eaeement~ehearciedeby saidehollovstabliahed to
convey storm vatar formerly
yo,P
zqO 20 ~ A~
~ /,` ~~ v,
~. iii • 9 0 0 ~~q 9.'~.S . \ ~/ "
3 I , . ~ gF~,°assc~tio ~ h. 4~ti
J ~t i) 6• d isl ~~? /L~Qq. ~ ~ N
Q ~
J : % I QaP ~P,.i•~ ~ SOIL is ~O~ 0?' F` i QJ y"N:~ Q /~
N to I ~EPgO a0 ~ / ~'`y ej P
O m ti 29 ~o Z ~ y~ 3 `~ ~ p v~ ``A to
CJ // Cv.B4• ~ ~1j'~ J~
d ~ ~ EXIgTING ~ \ \ ~ Op' ~h~O A a,1~2'>,
d ` NORgEPEN
~ ~ ~vJ ' Q ~~~ G\~ MOUNTAIN
~ ~ ? i3 I o ap oRlve
N O ,. 1 S l
G \ ~ vE ~..51TE
t,
0
LOT 4 ~ \ P~
o, ~ \ ~ ~
~ o / ~• •~ f
{{~,7 ~E.
~ ~ LOT 6 ~~0~
~ FIoLLOW Is ~~~
~ 2 p' t7. E
' ~g• q~pG•31G yIGINITY_ MAP
I
APPROVED
AGENT- ROANOKE COUNTY DATE •
PLANIJING COMMIgS10N
6U RVEY FOR
_ AKFER DEVELOPMENT CORP, INC.
~- - ~,,te~~NQ'y~ ~yNOWING NEW i°S• DRAINAGE EASEMENT
'~ 741ROUGH LOT`S 2, ?! f 4, BLOCK 2 SEC. ~,
` ~' ~ `'~ ~ L R PARKER ~~ FALLING CREEK E5~'ATES , P. B. 9 ,~ PG. 3 1 Ci
/;.:~~ s
' ~TS~*~MQ~, VINTON MAGIgTER1AL DISTRICT
_ ~A !t0
.~ ''~.,te ~~.~'' ROANOKE GoUNTY, V I RG I N I A
~. .., ~, LAMO
~>' '"~' `-~ T. P. PARKER ~ SON
~~..
`'~` - tNGtNEER9 ~ gURVGYORS, LT O.
. ~
SGALE~ I"~50' JAN. 11, 1966
eo• Zy a eo' loo• N. B. ~ F G. • cc W.O. »~ - 29 o B
~I•eo
~APNI~ALE
~~~~~ VIRGINIA:
!i BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY
I,
RE: RELOCATION OF DRAINAGE EASEMENT )
OVER, ACROSS AND THROUGH LOTS )
2, 3 AND 4, BLOCK 2, SECTION 6, ) FINAL ORDER
FALLING CREEK ESTATES, PLAT BOOK 9, )
~; PAGE 316. )
~I
ji
~' TO THE HONORABLE StPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY:
~~ WHEREAS, your Petitioners, AKFER DEVELOPMENT
I~
CORPORATION, INC. AND KENNETH G. BOWLES, did petition the
ii
!' Board of County Supervisors to abandon, vacate and relocate a
~~ portion of the drainage easement located on Lots 2, 3 and 4,
1' Block 2, Section 6, Falling Creek Estates and
{f
~! WHEREAS, after due legal notice, the Board of County
j Supervisors did hold a public hearing on said request
on February 23, 1988 at the Roanoke County
Administration Center, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, Roanoke,
i( Virginia, at which time all parties in interest were given an
I
opportunity to be heard, and
WHEREAS, after full consideration the Board of Roanoke
'i County Supervisors is of the opinion that the request should
be granted.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDERED, that the drainage
it easement, hereinabove described as crossing over, on and
through Lots 2, 3 and 4 of Block 2, Section 6, Falling Creek
Estates as shown on a plat attached hereto, be permanently
vacated, abandoned and relocated. j
,
I
z~~~~~
BE IT FtTRTHER ORDERED that a copy of this order be
transmitted to the Department of Development and that this
order be recorded by Petitioner along with the attached plat
among the land records of Roanoke County.
Adopted on motion of Supervisor
and upon this following recorded vote:
Nickens
Ayes _ Su~erviso~s_~Qhnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
Nays __ None ~_
Absent
Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
CC: Rob Stalzer, Director of Planning
John Willey, Real Estate Assessments
Arnold Covey, Director of Development Review
e
r~ ~ ~~~~~
VIRGINIA : '"~ °~~~r°~y: ~ ~:~~
...;..
BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF-~OAiw~~~..
~~ ~~-
RE; RELOCATION OF DRAINAGE EASEMENT )~,~.
OVER, ACROSS AND THROUGH LOTS ) PETITION
2, 3 AND 4, BLOCK 2, SECTION 6, )
FALLING CREEK ESTATES, PLAT BOOK 9, j
PAGE 316.
TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY:
YOUR PETITIONERS, AKFER DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, INC.
AND KENNETH G. BOWLES, respectfully file this Petition in
accordance with Section 15.1 - 482 (h) of the Code of
Virginia, 1950, as amended, and respectfully show the
following:
1. The subject property on record in the Clerks Office
of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia in Plat Book
9, Page 316 is as shown on the attached Exhibit "A".
2. The Petitioners desire that the drainage easement
shown on the survey plat of Block 2, Section 6, Falling Creek
Estates be permanently vacated and relocated.
3. The easement which the petitioners seek to relocate
is shown in red on the attached copy cif plat.
4. Petitioner desires to vacate the encroaching portions
of the drainage easement and relocate same as shown in blue on
the attached copy of the plat, and do not believe such
vacation and relocation would in any way be to the detriment
of the interest of the County of Roanoke, Virginia or of the
public.
O~ POANO,S-F
ti '~ A
Z
z
j `a
18 Eso 88
SFSQUICENTENN~P
A I3cnuti,ul6eginning
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
ELMER C. HODGE
C~vun~~ of ~n~tnnke
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
February 8, 1988
Mrs. Martha Plank
Roanoke Times & World-News
201-209 Campbell Avenue
Roanoke, VA 24011
Dear Mrs. Plank:
LEE GARRETT. CHAIRMAN
WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
RICHARD W. ROBERS. VICE-CHAIRMAN
CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
EiOB L. JOHNSON
HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
STEVEN A. MCGRAW
CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
HARRY C. NICKENS
VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
Please correct the spelling of Akfer Development Corporation in
the legal notice scheduled to appear in the evening edition on
February 9, 1988 and February 16, 1988. In addition, please
correct the spelling of Section in the first paragraph, line 7.
Thank you again for your invaluable assistance.
Sincerely,
~~LZ.~CQw
Brenda Holto
Acting Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
eabp
P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24018-0798 - (703) 772-2004
L E G A L N O T I C E
Notice is hereby given'to all interested persons that the
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at 7:00
p.m. on Tuesday, February 23, 1988, in-the Community Room at the Roanoke
County Administration Center, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, S.W., Roanoke,
Virginia, on the petition of Afker Development Corporation Inc. and
Kenneth G. Bowles, requesting vacation and relocation of drainage
easements over, across and through Lots 2, 3, and 4, Block 2, Ssection
6, Falling Creek Estates, Plat Book 9, Page 316 in the Vinton
Magisterial District.
A copy of the Zoning Ordinance of Roanoke County and amendments
thereto as well as a copy of the petition, site plan, and other
documents related to this request may be examined in the office of the
Department of Development, located in Room 600 at the Roanoke County
Administration Center.
Roanoke County will provide assistance to handicapped persons
desiring to attend public hearings. Such individuals are requested to
contact the County office of Human Resources ([703] 772-2018) if special
provisions are necessary for attendance.
Given under my hand this 4th day of February, 1988.
Y~'~ czz~ .~.
Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
Please publish in the evening edition
of the Roanoke Times and World News on:
Tuesday, February 9, 1988
Tuesday, February 16, 1988
Direct the bill for Publication to:
James E. Buchholtz
714 Dale Avenue
Suite A
Vinton, Va. 24179
A P P E A R A I:~'C E'~ R E Q U E S T
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
PUBLIC HEARING ON ~~~ ~~ ~-- ~ (~
I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to
recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so
that I may comment. I agree to follow the guidelines listed
below. WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND
ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD.
1. Each speaker will have between three and five minutes
available whether speaking as an individual or
representative. The chairman will decide the time limit
based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and
will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of
the Board to do otherwise.
2. Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of
view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by
the Chairman.
3. All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between
a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed.
4. Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all
times .
5. Speakers are requested to leave any written statements
and/or comments with the clerk.
6. INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL
FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP
ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM.
P L E A S E W R I T E L E G I B L Y
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
NAME: ~, ~ ~ ~1O1C~(-~ I-~L~~T Z
ADDRESS : _~_~ ~~. ~ ~~ /Q- ~,~.~,
PHONE: l 7~~~, c~ `~-9-` ~S Col
PLEASE NOTE: (After filling out, give to the Deputy
Clerk. Thank you.)
ITEM NUMBER '2"0 ~ "~ ~'f
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BNOKE COUNTYEADMINISTRATIONCENTER
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT,TON TIIESDAY, FEBRUARY 23, 1988
IN ROp,NOKE, VA. ,
1988
MEETING DATE: February 23, stem
SUB_ J~_ public Hearing he Countysof Roan keainaa Principal
Revenue Bond of t 000 to Finance Extensions of
Amount not to exceed $975' stem and the Adoption of
the County's Existing Water Sy
a Resolution Autald Revenue Bondsrginia Resources
Authority to Issue S
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
pursuant to section 15.1-17 rv s rs is requ ~ ed tolholdoa
1950 as amended, the Board of Supe
rior to the adoption of an ordinance or
public hearing p
resolution authorizing t1987ssyoucauthorized staffsto work with
meeting on November 17, ' for the issuance of water
the Virginia Resources Authority stem of the
revenue bonds to finance extensiooint projects.sy These two
County for the APCO and Valleyp
rojects and the issuance costs usinsaidheo revenues efrom0~the
P
and these bonds will be repal g
County's water system.
p,fter receiving any citizen comment concerning the issuance
of these bonds, staff recommends that you adopt the attached
re ared by McGuire, Woods. Battle & Boothe, Bond
resolution as p P which authorizes the issuance of the
Counsel for Roanoke County,
$ 9 6 0 ,~0 0 0 water system revenue bonds through the 19881 and
Resources Authority. The bonds will be dated March 1,
will be in the form as prescribed in the resolution documents.
The preliminary draft form of the resolution is resented to youoat
consideration and the final version will be p
your meeting on February 23 for final acceptance.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The debt service to repay these water revesustem dandlno
come from the water revenues of our utility y
appropriation is required at this time.
RECOMMENDATION:
ublic hearing is held, that
Staff recommends that after a P e ared by Bond Counsel, be
the final form of the resolution, as p P
adopted, which will authorize the issuance of the $960,000 water
revenue bonds through the Virtginia Resources Authority. ~ ~~ '//
SUBMITTED BY:
hn M. Chambl~ s, Jr
Assistant Administrator
APPROVED:
~ ~
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
--------------------
ACTION VOTE
No Yes Abs
Approved ( > Motion by:
Denied ( )
Received ( )
Ref erred
To
JMC/cw
Attachment - Draft Resolution
cc: Diane Hyatt
Cliff Craig
Sarah Rice
Garrett
Johnson
McGraw
Nickens
Robers
M~Gvi~~oo~
$AT'CLE &
PRELIMIN ~~~RAFT
DATED
EXHIBIT C TO
FINANCING AGREEMENT
PROJECT BUDGET
Soule s
Local Bond Proceeds
Uses:
Sub-Project 14 -- Valleypointe
Water Extension ppCO Water
Sub-Project 15 -
Extension
Costs of Issuance fationVLocal
and General Oblig
Bonds and Contingency
$96_ 0=0~0
$96_ 0_~ 0
$580,000
215,000
16_ 5_-
$96~p,0_OU
~ 8cJ ~- /I
f
..2_. 8 8 -- i/
NC7rICE OF PUBLIC I-BARING ON PROPOSED BOND
FINANCING BY ROANOKE
Notice is hereby given that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia (the "County") will hold a public hearing in accordance
with Section 15.1-171.1 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended, on the
issuance of general obligation bonds not to exceed $3,985,000 (the "Bonds")
of the County to assist in financing renovations and improvements to Back
Creek Elementary School and Bent Mountain Elementary School. A resolution
authorizing the issuance of the Bonds will be considered by the Board of
Supervisors at its meeting on February 23, 1988. A copy of such resolution
is on file in the office of the County Administrator.
The public hearing, which may be continued or adjourned, will be held
at the evening session beginning at 7:00 p.m., Tuesday, February 23, 1988,
before the Board of Supervisors, in the Community Room of the Roanoke
County Administration Center, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, Roanoke, Virginia.
~~, ~ ~ ~
Paul M. Mahoney
County Attorney of
Roanoke County, Virginia
Publish on the following dates in the morning and evening editions:
Tuesday, February 9, 1988
Tuesday, February 16, 1988
Send invoice to:
Board of Supervisors
P. 0. Box 29800
Roanoke, VA 24018-0798
X88 - i/
N~IGE OF PUBLIC HEARING C7N PROPOSIDNBOrID
FINANCING BY ROANOKE ~'Y.
Notice is hereby given that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia (the "County") will hold a public hearing in accordance
with Section 15.1-171.1 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended, on the
issuance of a Water System Revenue Bond (the "Bond") of the County in a
principal amount not to exceed $975,000 to finance extensions of the
County's existing water system. A resolution .authorizing the issuance of
the Bond will be considered by the Board of Supervisors at its meeting on
February 23, 1988. A copy of such resolution is on file in the office of
the County Administrator.
The public hearing, which may be continued or adjourned, will beheld
at the evening session beginning at 7:00 p.m., Tuesday, February 23, 1988,
before the Board of Supervisors, in the Community Room of the Roanoke
County Administration Center, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, Roanoke, Virginia<
~`
Paul M. Mahoney
County Attorney of
Roanoke County, Virginia
Publish on the following dates in the morning and evening editions:
Tuesday, February 9, 1988
Tuesday, February 16, 1988
Send invoice to:
Board of Supervisors
P. O. Box 29800
Roanoke, VA 24018-0798
~IcG E~~i~c~o ~~
BATTL-
PRELIIVIINARY DRAFT
DATED °2 - ~ gg
RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE ~ ~~_. ~
COUNTY OF ROANORE, VIRGINIA, AUTHORIZING THE
ISSUANCE OF ITS $960,000 WATER SYSTEM REVENUE BOND
SERIES 1988A, AND SETTING FORTH
THE FORM AND DETAILS THEREOF
The County of Roanoke, Virginia ("County"), a political
subdivision of the Commonwealth of Virginia, has applied for and
has received approval for a loan of $960,000 from the Virginia
Resources Authority ("Authority") to finance extensions of the
water system. The County will issue its Water
County's existing
in the
System Revenue Bond, Series 1988A ("Local Bond"),
aggregate principal amounncef the6County'snobligation tocrepaynthe
to the Authority to evade
loan.
The foregoing arrangements are reflected in the following
documents, forms of which have been presented to tAire mentng and
filed with the County s documents: (lA reement"1, between the
dated as of March 1, 1988 togetherlwithga form of the Local Bond
Authority and the County, Reoffering Statement, dated
attached thereto, and (2) PreliReoffering Statement").
February 9, 1988 ("Preliminary
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
OF THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA, THAT:
1. Authorization of Bond. The issuance of a revenue bond
of the County to be kno d aSeriesC1988A,oisRauthorizedrg1The~
Water System Revenue Bon ,
Local Bond shall be issued in the original Purchaselpricensetf
$960,000 and sold to the Authority for the p
forth in the Financing Agreement, which purchase price is hereby
determined to be in the best interests of the Commonwealth of
Virginia and the County.
2, Authorization of Financing Agreement. The Financing
Agreement is approved. The Chairman of the County's Board of
Supervisors ("Chairman") is authorized to execute onthehform f
the County the Financing Agreement in substantially
submitted to this meeting, with such changes, insertions or
roved by the Chairman, whose approval
omissions as may be app
shall be evidenced conclusively by the execution and delivery
thereof. The~~Chairman, the Clerk of the County's Board of -
Supervisors ( Clerk ), the Treasurer of the County ("Treasurer"),
the County Administrator and the Assistant County Administrator
Management Services ("AssideliveroontbehalfnofttheoCountyesuchh
authorized to execute and
other instruments, documents or certificates, and to do and
perform such thin~~ aoutathe~transactionslauthorizedebyat isr
appropriate to ca y
,2 88 - i ~
Resolution or contemplated by the Local Bond or the Financing
Agreement, and all of the foregoing, previously done or performed
by the Chairman, the Clerk, the Treasup,~inistratortyare in all
Administrator or the Assistant County
respects approved, ratified and confirmed.
3, Details of Local w~thoutTcouponslandnshalllbebdatedued
as a fully registered bond
March 1, 1988. The Lohel r°ncipallamount thereoftshallhberates
indicated below, and t p
payable, subject to prior ntdamounts~set forthbbelowin each of
the years and in the payme
Principal
Payment
Amount
Principal
Payment
Due Date
November 1, 1989
November 1, 1990
November 1, 1991
November 1, 1992
November 1, 1993
November 1, 1994
November 1, 1995
November 1, 1996
November 1, 1997
November 1, 1998
November 1, 1999
November 1, 2000
November 1, 2001
November 1, 2002
November 1, 2003
November 1, 2004
November 1, 2005
November 1, 2006
November 1, 2007
November 1, 2008
Interest
Rate
Each principal installment of the Local Bond shall bear
interest at its respective interest rate from the daid.ofInterest
Local Bond until such principal payment amount is p
on the Local Bond shall bethsmpuThe principalsof andapremiumf if0
days and twelve 30-day mon lace
any, and interest on videdoinlthenFinancingeAgreementat the p
and in the manner pro
The principal of and premium, if any, and interest on the
Local Bond shall be payab Revenuesw(as definedfinhthenFinancingeS
of America only from the ent thereof as
Agreement) and other sources pledged to the paym
provided in the Financing Agreement.
-2-
-2 88 -~ i/
4, Prepayment of Local Bond. The Local Bond shall be
subject to prepayment as set forth in the Financing Agreement.
5, Execution of Local Bond. The Local Bond shall be
signed by the manual or facsimile signature of the Chairman and
the Treasurer, and the corporate seal of the County or a
facsimile of such seal orafacsimilelsignatureoofat esClerk.e In
attested by the manu ear on the Local Bond
case any officer whose signature shall app
shall cease to be such ofiineverthelesshbedvalidrandfsufficient
Bond, such signature shal
for all purposes the same as if he or shebeasignedlbydsuch ffice
until such delivery. The Local Bond may
persons as at the actual tnmsuch LocalxBondlalthough atstheldate
the proper officers to sig
of delivery of such Local Bond such persons may not have been
such officers.
6, Form of Local Bond. The Local Bond shall be
substantially in the form ariateevariations,tomissions andancing
Agreement, with such approp
insertions as permitteTherermaylbedendorsed onsthetLocalrBond
Financing Agreement. ro riate to conform
such legend or text as may be necessary or aPP overnmental
to any applicable rules and regulations of any g
authority or any usage or requirement of law with respect
thereto.
~, Registration, Transfer and Exchange. The County hereby
appoints the Clerk arationrandstransfer ofatheeLocalnBond andpto
books for the regist
make such registrations and transfers under such reasonable
regulations as the County may prescribe.
Upon surrender for tthesCounty shallnexecuteh and deliverdint
the office of the Clerk,
the name of the traaif~ountrequalstorthe Local Bondlsurrendered
Bonds for a princip
and of the same forcalnBondtsurrenderedeasubjecttineeachtcase to
same rate as the Lo rescribe. If
such reasonable regulations as theredemptionyor payment, the
presented for transfer, exchange,
Local Bond shall be accompanied by a written instrumentlnrform
instruments of transfer or authorization for exchangeduly
and substance reasonably satisfactory thishorChertduly authorized
executed by the registered owner or by
attorney-in-fact or legal representative. The Local Bond may not
be registered to bearer.
A new Local Bond delivered upon any transfer or et$easame
shall be a valid obligation of the County, evidencing
debt as the Local Bond surrendered, shall be secured by this
Resolution and the Financing Agreement and entitled to all of the
-3-
.~.~~ -//
security and benefits hereof to the same extent as the Local Bond
surrendered.
No charge shall be
g, Charges for Exchange or Transfer.
made for any exchange or transfer of the Local Bond, but the
County may require payment by the holder of the Local Bond of a
sum sufficient to cover any tax or other governmental charge that
may be imposed in relation thereto.
9. Temporary Typewritten Local Bond. The County may
initially issue the Local Bond in typewritten form. If the Local
Bond is issued in typewritten form, upon the written request of
the registered owner of the Local Bond and shallspromptly °f the
Local Bond in typewritten form, the County
prepare, execute and deliver to such regisandeinterestarateaand
Bond in printed form of the same maturitewritten Local Bond.
for the same principal amount as the typ be made in
Appropriate variations, omissions and insertions may
the Local Bond to facilitate printing.
10. Mutilated, Lost Slated,olostStstolenLoradestroyedlfthe
the Local Bond has been mute
County shall execute aanddsubstitution foralandnupon deliveryeto
and tenor in exchange
the County and canceitution for such lostlastolencor destroyedln
lieu of and in subst
Local Bond; provided, however, that the County shall execute,
authenticate and deliver a newsonableBexpenses andtchargessofrthe
owner thereof has paid the rea
County in connection therewitasafalednwith theeCountylevidencelen
or destroyed Local Bond (i) h
satisfactory to it tthetholderLofatheoLocalsBondtwastthen °r
destroyed and that
registered owner thereotoait.(lIf the LocalsBondthashmaturedy
indemnity satisfactory ma a the same
instead of issuing a new Local Bond, the County Y P Y
without surrender thereof upon receipt of the aforesaid evidence
and indemnity.
11. Preliminary Reoffering Statement. The inclusion of the
information with respect to the County containeStatementsection
"Roanoke County" in the Preliminary Reoffering
prepared in connection with the reoffering and salAe r emett), is
Corresponding Bonds (as defined in the Financing g
hereby ratified and confirmed tatementu f thesAuthoritymislhereby
final form in the Reoffering S
authorized and approved; provided, however, such information
contained in the ReoffertnCountt Administrator beforeethend
approved by the Assistan Y
distribution of the Reoffering Statement.
-4-
-288 - i /
12. Filin of Resolution; Notice. ctedCtolfile ordcause to
Clerk are each hereby authorized and lire
be filed a certified copy of this Resolution with the Circuit
Court of Roanoke County pursuant to Sections 15.1-199 and
15.1-212 of the Code of Virgshlonce in5a~newspapereof generalhin
ten days thereafter to publi forth (1) in brief and
circulation in the County a notice setting
general terms the purpose for which the Local bond is to be
issued and (2) the principal amount of the Local Bond.
13. All parts of resolutions of the Board which are in
conflict with this Resolution are hereby rescinded and repealed.
14. Effective Date. This Resolution shall take effect
immediately.
-5-
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINCENTERLONATUESDAYOAFOBRUARYN23,AD988ISTRATION
RESOLUTION 22388-5 OF THE BOARD OF
SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA,
AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF ITS $960,000
WATER SYSTEM REVENUE BOND, SERIES 1988A,
AND SETTING FORTH THE FORM AND DETAILS
THEREOF
The County of Roanoke, Virginia ("County"), a political
subdivision of the Commonwealth of Virginia, has applied for and
has received approval for a loan of $960,000 from the Virginia
Resources Authority ("Authority") to finance extensions of the
County's existing water system. The County will issue its Water
System Revenue Bond, Series 1988A ("Local Bond"), in the original
principal amount of $960,000, and sell the Local Bond to the Au-
thority to evidence the County's obligation to repay the loan.
The foregoing arrangements are reflected in the follow-
ing documents, forms of which have been presented to this meeting
and filed with the County's documents: (1) Financing Agreement,
dated as of March 1, 1988 ("Financing Agreement"), between the
Authority and the County, together with a form of the Local Bond
attached thereto, and (2) Preliminary Reoffering Statement, dated
February 9, 1988 ("Preliminary Reoffering Statement").
NOW, T~~EREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervi-
sors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that:
1. Definitions. Unless otherwise defined, all capital-
ized terms used in this Resolution shall have the meanings set
forth in the Financing Agreement.
1
2. Authorization of Bond. The issuance of a revenue
bond of the County to be known as the County of Roanoke, Virgin-
ia, Water System Revenue Bond, Series 1988A, is authorized. The
Local Bond shall be issued in the original principal amount of
$960,000 and sold to the Authority for the purchase price set
forth in the Financing Agreement, which purchase price is hereby
determined to be in the best interests of the Commonwealth of
Virginia and the County.
3. Authorization of Financing Agreement. The Finan-
cing Agreement is approved. The Chairman of the County's Board
of Supervisors ("Chairman") is authorized to execute on behalf of
the County the Financing Agreement in substantially the form sub-
mitted to this meeting, with such changes, insertions or omis-
sions as may be approved by the Chairman, whose approval shall be
evidenced conclusively by the execution and delivery thereof.
The Chairman, the Clerk of the County's Board of Supervisors
("Clerk"), the Treasurer of the County ("Treasurer"), the County
Administrator, the Assistant County Administrator - Management
Services ("Assistant County Administrator") and the Director of
Utilities of the County ("Director") are each authorized to exe-
cute and deliver on behalf of the County such other instruments,
documents or certificates, and to do and perform such things and
acts, as they shall deem necessary or appropriate to carry out
the transactions authorized by this Resolution or contemplated by
the Local Bond or the Financing Agreement, and all of the fore-
going, previously done or performed by the Chairman, the Clerk,
the Treasurer, the County Administrator, the Assistant County
2
Administrator or the Director, are in all respects approved, rat-
i f ied and confirm ed .
4. Details of Local B ond. The Local Bond shall be
ed as a fully
i registered bond without coupons in the denomina-
ssu
tion of $960,000 and shall be dated March 1, 1988. The Local
Bond shall bear interest at the rates indicated below, and the
principal amount thereof shall be payable, subject to prior re-
demption, on Nov ember 1 i.n each of the years and in t he payment
amounts set forth below:
Principal Princ ipal Interest
Payment Payme
Due D nt
ate Rate
Amount
000
$20
November
1, 1988 4.50
5.0
,
25,000 November
November 1, 1989
1990
1 5.2
25,000
000
25
November ,
1, 1991 5.4
5.6
,
30,000 November
r
b 1, 1992
1993
1 5.8
30,000 e
Novem
November ,
1994
1 6.0
35,000
000
35
November ,
1, 1995 6 2
6.35
,
35,000 November
ber 1, 1996
1997
1 6.5
40,000 Novem
November ,
1998
1 6,65
40,000
000
45
November ,
1, 1999 6.8
6.9
,
45,000 November
November 1, 2000
2001
1 7.0
50,000
000
55 November ,
1, 2002 7.1
7.2
,
60,000 November
r
b 1, 2003
2004
1 7.3
65,000 e
Novem
November ,
2005
1 7,35
65,000
000
70
November ,
1, 2006 7 4
7,45
,
80,000 November
r
b 1, 2007
2008
1 7.5
85,000 e
Novem ,
Each principal install ment of the Local Bond shall bear
interest at its respective int erest rate from the date of the
Local Bond until such principal payment amount is pai d. In addi-
tion, the Coun ty shall pay a late payment charge as provided in
the Financing Agreement if any payment of principal or interest
3
is not received within five days of its due date. Interest on
the Local Bond shall be computed on the basis of a year of 360
days and twelve 30-day months. The principal of and premium, if
any, and interest on the Local Bond shall be payable at the place
and in the manner provided in the Financing Agreement.
Subject to the right of the County to apply Revenues to
rovi-
the payment of Operation and Maintenance Expense and to the p
lions of the Financing Agreement, the Revenues are hereby pledged
to secure the payment of the principal of and premium, if any,
and interest on the Local Bond and the performance of the
County's obligations under the Financing Agreement.
The principal of and premium, if any, and interest on
the Local Bond shall be payable in lawful money of the United
States of America only from the Revenues and other sources
pledged to the payment thereof as provided in this Resolution and
the Financing Agreement.
5. Prepayment of Local Bond. The Local Bond shall be
subject to prepayment as set forth in the Financing Agreement.
6. Acceleration of Local Bond. If an Event of Default
shall have occurred and be continuing, the principal amount of
and accrued interest on the Local Bond may be declared immediate-
ly due and payable by written notice to the County.
7. Execution of Local Bond. The Local Bond shall be
signed by the manual or facsimile signature of the Chairman and
the Treasurer, and the corporate seal of the County or a facsim-
ile of such seal shall be affixed thereon and shall be attested
by the manual or facsimile signature of the Clerk. In case any
4
officer whose signature shall appear on the Local Bond shall
cease to be such officer before the delivery of the Local Bond,
such signature shall nevertheless be valid and sufficient for all
purposes the same as if he or she had remained in office until
such delivery. The Local Bond may be signed by such persons as
at the actual time of the execution thereof shall be the proper
officers to sign such Local Bond although at the date of delivery
of such Local Bond such persons may not have been such officers.
g. Form of Local Bond. The Local Bond shall be sub-
stantially in the form attached as Exhibit A to the Financing
Agreement, with such appropriate variations, omissions and inser-
tions as permitted or required by this Resolution or the Finan-
cing Agreement. There may be endorsed on the Local Bond such
legend or text as may be necessary or appropriate to conform to
any applicable rules and regulations of any governmental autho-
rity or any usage or requirement of law with respect thereto.
g. Registration, Transfer and Exchange. The County
hereby appoints the Clerk as its registrar and transfer agent to
keep books for the registration and transfer of the Local Bond
and to make such registration and transfers under such reasonable
regulations as the County may prescribe.
Upon surrender for transfer or exchange of the Local
Bond at the office of the Clerk, the County shall execute and
deliver in the name of the transferee or transferees a new Local.
Bond or Bonds for a principal amount equal to the Local Bond sur-
rendered and of the same form and maturity and bearing interest
at the same rate as the Local Bond surrendered, subject in each
5
case to such reasonable regulations as the County may prescribe.
If presented for transfer, exchange, redemption or payment, the
Local Bond shall be accompanied by a written instrument or instru-
ments of transfer or authorization for exchange, in form and sub-
stance reasonably satisfactory to the County, duly executed by
the registered owner or by his or her duly authorized attorney-in-
fact or legal representative. The Local Bond may not be regis-
tered to bearer.
A new Local Bond delivered upon any transfer or ex-
change shall be a valid obligation of the County, evidencing the
same debt as the Local Bond surrendered, shall be secured by this
Resolution and the Financing Agreement and entitled to all of the
security and benefits hereof to the same extent as the Local Bond
surrendered.
10. Charges for Exchange or Transfer. No charge shall
be made for any exchange or transfer of the Local Bond, but the
County may require payment by the holder of the Local Bond of a
sum sufficient to cover any tax or other governmental charge that
may be imposed in relation thereto.
11. Temporary Typewritten Local Bond. The County may
initially issue the Local Bond in typewritten form. If the Local
Bond is issued in typewritten form, upon the written request of
the registered owner of the Local Bond and upon surrender of the
Local Bond in typewritten form, the County shall promptly pre-
pare, execute and deliver to such registered owner a Local Bond
in printed form of the same maturity and interest rate and for
the same principal amount as the typewritten Local Bond. Appro-
6
priate variations, omissions and insertions may be made in the
Local. Bond to facilitate printing.
12. Mutilated, Lost, Stolen or Destroyed Local Bond.
If the Local Bond has been mutilated, lost, stolen or destroyed,
the County shall execute and deliver a new Local Bond of like
date and tenor in exchange and substitution for, and upon deliv-
ery to the County and cancellation of, such mutilated Local Bond,
or in lieu of and in substitution for such lost, stolen or de-
stroyed Local Bond; provided, however, that the County shall exe-
cute, authenticate and deliver a new Local Bond only if the regis-
tered owner thereof has paid the reasonable expenses and charges
of the County in connection therewith and, in the case of a lost,
stolen or destroyed Local Bond (i) has filed with the County evi-
dence satisfactory to it that such Local Bond was lost, stolen or
destroyed and that the holder of the Local Bond was the regis-
tered owner thereof and (ii) has furnished to the County indem-
nity satisfactory to it. If the Local Bond has matured, instead
of issuing a new Local Bond, the County may pay the same without
surrender thereof upon receipt of the aforesaid evidence and in-
demnity.
13. Preliminary Reoffering Statement. The inclusion
of the information with respect to the County contained in the
section "Roanoke County" in the Preliminary Reoffering Statement,
prepared in connection with the reoffering and sale of the Corre-
sponding Bonds (as defined in the Financing Agreement), is hereby
ratified and confirmed and the use of such information in final
7
form in the Reoffering Statement of the Authority is hereby autho-
rized and approved; provided, however, such information contained
in the Reoffering Statement shall be reviewed and approved by the
Assistant County Administrator before the distribution of the
Reoffering Statement.
14. Filin of Resolution; Notice. The Chairman and
the Clerk are each hereby authorized and directed to file or
cause to be filed a certified copy of this Resolution with the
Circuit Court of Roanoke County pursuant to Sections 15.1-199 and
15.1-212 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended, and within
ten days thereafter to publish once in a newspaper of general
circulation in the County a notice setting forth (1) in brief and
general terms the purpose for which the Local Bond is to be
issued and (2) the principal amount of the Local Bond.
15. Conflicting Resolutions. All parts of resolutions
of the Board which are in conflict with this Resolution are here-
by rescinded and repealed.
16. Effective Date. This Resolution shall take effect
immediately.
On motion of Supervisor Robers, seconded by Supervisor
Nickens, and upon the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
ABSTAIN: Supervisor McGraw
A COPY - TESTE:
!"/
Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
8
2/24/88
cc: File
John Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator
John Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator
Paul Mahoney, County Attorney
Alfred C. Anderson, County Treasurer
Clifford Craig, Director of Utilities
McGuire, WooduitBCourt ofHRoanokeCCountyBond Counsel
Clerk of C
9
CERTIFICATE OF PUBLIC HEARING
The undersigned Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of the
County of Roanoke, Virginia ("Board"), hereby certifies as
follows:
1. A regular meeting of the Board was duly called and held
on February 23, 1988, at 7:00 p.m. in the Community Room of the
Roanoke County Administration Center, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, in
Roanoke, Virginia. The meetj.ng was open to the public. The time
of ~he meeting and the place at which the meeting was held
provided a reasonable opportunity for persons of differing views
to appear and be heard.
2. The Chairman of the Board announced the commencement of
a public hearing on the issuance of a Water System Revenue Bond
of the County of Roanoke, Virginia ("County"). A notice of the
hearing was published once a week for two successive weeks in a
newspaper having general circulation in the County ("Notice"),
with the second publication appearing not less than seven days
before the hearing date. A copy of the Notice is attached hereto
as Exhibit A.
3. The names of the individuals who appeared and addressed
the Roard, along with a summary of their statements, is attached
hereto as Exhibit B.
WITNESS my hand and the seal of the Board of Supervisors of
Vir inia, this 24th day of February,
the County of Roanoke, g
1988.
~'
Deputy Clerk of the Board of
Supervisors of the County of
Roanoke, Virginia
[SEAL]
Exhibits:
A - Copy of Certified Notice
B - Summary of Statements
-2-
E~HI$IT B TO CERTIFICATE
Summary of Statements
No individuals were present to address this issue
CERTIFICATE OF CLERK
The undersigned Cierk of the Board of Supervisors of the
County of Roanoke, Virginia, hereby certifies that:
1. A regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors of the
County of Roanoke, Virginia ("Board"), was duly called and held
on February 23, 1988, at which the following members were present
and absent:
PRESENT: Supervisors Bob L. Johnson, Richard Robers,
Steven A. McGraw, Harry C. Nickens, Lee Garrett
ABSENT: None
2. A resolution entitled "Resolution of the Board of
Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia, Authorizing the
Issuance of Its $960,000 Water System Revenue Bond, Series 1988A,
and Setting Forth the Form and Details Thereof" ("Resolution"),
was duly adopted at a regular meeting duly called and held on
February 23, 1988, by the recorded affirmative vote of a majority
of all of the. members elected to the Board, the ayes and nays
being recorded in the minutes of the meeting as shown below:
MEMBER VOTE
Supervisor Johnson Aye
Supervisor Robers Aye
Abstain
Supervisor McGraw
Supervisor Nickens Aye
Supervisor Garrett Aye
3. Attached hereto is a true and correct copy of the
Resolution as recorded in full in the minutes of the meeting held
on February 23, 1988.
4. The Resolution has not been repealed, revoked,
rescinded or amended and is in full force and effect on the date
hereof.
WITNESS my signature and the seal of the Board of
Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia, this 24th day of
February, 1988.
yeah-~y~ ~
Deputy Clerk of the Board of
Supervisors of the County of
Roanoke, Virginia
(SEAL]
-2-
PUBLIC NOTICE OF BORROWING
On the 23rd day of February, 1988, the Board of Supervisors
of the County of Roanoke, Virginia, adopted a resolution entitled
"Resolution of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke,
Virginia, Authorizing the Is~uance of Its $960,000 Water System
Revenue Bond, Series 1988A, and Setting Forth the Form and
Details Thereof."
The purpose for which the Bond is proposed to be issued is
to provide funds to finance extensions of the County's existing
water system.
The Bond will be in the maximum principal amount of
$960,000.
Mary H. Allen, Deput~lerk of the
Board of Supervisors of the
County of Roanoke, Virginia
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE EOROANOKESCOUNTYSADMINISTRATOON
COUNTY. VIRGINIA, HELD AT TH 1g88
CENTER ON TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 23,
RESOLUTION 22388-6 AUTHORIZING THE
ISSUANCE AND OF THE COUNTY OF
ROANOKE, VIRGINIA, REVENUE ANT8COO0T000
NOTEAppROVING~HENFORM ANDTDETAILS
AND
THEREOF
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors (the "Board") of the
t of Roanoke, Virginia (the "County") has determined that it
Coun y
necessary and expedient to borrow $8,000,000 and to issue its
is 000,000
revenue anticipation notes in an amount not to exceed $8-
(the "Notes") to meet casual cash flow deficits of the County;
and
WHEREAS, the County desires to specify the form and
Administrator to
details of 'the Notes and authorize the County investors for the
solicit bids from a limited number of potential
purchase of such Notes. ervi-
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Sup
sors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows:
1. The Board of the County determines that it is advis-
able to contract a debt and issue and sell the Notes in an agfre-
ate principal amount of $8,000,000. The issuance and sale o
g
the Notes are authorized. The proceeds from the sale of t e
Notes shall be used to meet casual cash flow deficits of the
County. without
2. The Notes shall be issued in bearer form,
ivile e of registration and without coupons, in substantially
pr g
the form attached as Exhibit A. The Notes shall be dated
March 14, 1988; shall be issued in denominations of $25,000;
se uentially; shall bear inter-
shall be numbered N-1 and upward, q
rate to be set by a subsequent resolution of this Board
est at a lggg, The
ayable at maturity; and shall mature on June 13,
P
es shall nit be subject to payment or redemption before ma u-
Not
rity. are pledged
3. The full faith and credit of the County nterest on
rincipal of and 1
to the paymen' at maturity of the p
Notes. Unless other funds are lawfully available and apprbe
the there shall
priated for the timely payment of the Bonds,
ithou~. limitation as to rate or amount, and collected in
levied, w
ordance with law, an annual ad valorem tax on all taxable pro
acc
t in the County subject to local taxation sufficient tO prat
per y
'de for payment of the principal of and interest on the No es
vi
maturity.
4, The County Administrator and Treasurer of the
are hereby authorized and directed to execute the Note he
County rint t
and the Treasurer is hereby authorized to affix or imp m rint-
i p
seal of the County on the Notes. The form of execution,
be by facsimile; provided,
ing of the seal and attestation may
ver if the signatures of the County Administrator and Trea-
howe ,
e both by facsimile, the Notes shall not be valid unti
surer ar A ent. In
authenticated by the manual signature of the Paying g
an officer whose signature or a facsimile of whose signa=
case y
shall appear on any Note shall cease to be such officer e
ture
delivery of the Notes, such signature or such facsimi e
fore the ur oses the
shall nevertheless be valid and sufficient for all P p elivery.
me as if he or she had remained in office until such d
sa
2
" ~ be signed by
Any Note may bear the facsimi]_e signature of or may
the pro-
such persons as at the actual time of its execution aof delivery
er officers to sign such Note although at the date
p
Note such persons may not have been such officers. pon
of such or such
cei t of payment therefor, the Treasurer of the County
0
re p
as ma be designated, shall issue and deliver the Notes
agent Y ents of
e urchaser or purchasers thereof. The officers and ag
th p
nt are further authorized and directed to do all ac s
the Cou y unc-
the Notes and by this Resolution for the full, p
required by for this
tual and complete performance of all things necessary
borrowing. in Agent for the
5, Crestar Bank is appointed as Pay g
The principal of and interest on the Notes shall be Piss
Notes
of the United States upon surrender o
able in lawful money orate trust
Notes on the maturity date at the principal corp
Virginia.
office of the Paying Agent in Richmond,
that the
6, The Board agrees on behalf of the County
the issuance and sale of the Notes will be invested
proceeds from
d as set forth in the Non-Arbitrage Certificate of the
and expende
o be delivered at the time of the issuance and delivers
County t
e Notes and that the County will comply with the covenan
of th the County shall
and representations contained therein. Further,
' h the reporting requirements of Section 149(e) of the
comply wit
as amended.
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, are autho-
~, The officers and advisors of the County investors
' ed to solicit from a limited number of sophisticated
riz
bids to purchase the Notes.
3
g, The officers and agents of the County are autho-
be neces-
rized and directed to take such further action as masale and de-
sary or convenient in connection with the issuan aken by such offi-
livery of the Notes and all actions previously t
and agents in connection therewith are ratified and con-
cers
firmed.
The appropriate officers and agents of the County
9
rized and directed to immediately cause a certified copy
are autho
Resolution, setting forth the form and details of the
of this ursuant
Notes, to be filed with the Circuit Court of the County pof 1950,
to Section 15.1-199 and 15.1-212 of the Code of Virginia
d and the notice required by Section 15.1-199 of the
as amende - ublished.
as amended, to be p
Code of Virginia of 1950,
10. This Resolution shall take effect immediately. or
On motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by Supervis
McGraw, and upon the following recorded vote:
Su ervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
AYES : P
NAYS: None
A COPY - TESTE:
~• ~~~
~,L~, Deputy Clerk
Mary H. Allen, ervisors
Roanoke County Board of Sup
2/24/88
cc: File p,ssistant County Admini~~l°~"`
John Chambliss, County Treasurer
Alfred C. Anderson,
Diane Hyatt, Director of Finanement and Budget
Reta Busher, Director of Manag
Paul Mahoney, County Attorney
• ITEM NUMBER Z ~.~" ~• f.
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THROANOKE COUNTYEADMINISTRATION OENTER
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT TON TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 23, 1988
IN ROANOKE, VA.,
1988
MEETING DATE: February 23,
SUBJECT: Public Hearing for Citizen Co~on$lOn OOUh000aRevenue
-- the Treasurer to issue up erational~Cash Deficits
Anticipation Notes to Cover Op
and Adoption of a Resolution Authorizing the County to
proceed with the Issuance of Said Notes
OUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
Du ~~
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
Section 15.1-171.1 of the Code of Virginia of 19ublic
amended, requires the Board of Superbondsr(notes)~l Thisppublic
hearing prior to the issuance of any
hearing is being held to authorize the treasurer to iss000r000nto
anticipation notes in an amo which areoanticipated~during the
cover the casual cash deficits,
spring of 1988, prior to the collection of taxes which will be
31 and June 5, 1988.
due on May
The need f or this short term borrowing is not du ~ot es s Vebut
short falls or problems in the revenue estimating p
rather is a timing difference no esaarefreceiv dsduring the tax
majority of the County s reve
collection period in Novemberrsonalmproperty dtaxesna d Junet5
of May (May 31 deadline for pe
deadline for real estate taxeO) eratingnexpenses~noccuroon a hmore
including payrolls and normal p
consistent cycle throughficientlyelargeoto t ketcareaof these
fund balance is not suf borrow in
operational cash deficits, the County must occasionalrovide cash
anticipation of the receipt of the tax revenues to p
flow for these periods.
the County borrowed $10,000,000 on February 27,
or
During 1987,
which was repaid on August 14 to cover said cash n000,000 for
1988, staff recommends authorizroves thisorequest, staff will
this purpose. If the Board app
continue working with the Financial Advisor, Wheat First
Security) and Bond Counsel (McGuire, Woods, Battle & $O March 8~
receive bids for thismmend aef final rawardo toutheyBoard of
1988, and will reco
Supervisors at your meeting on that date. It is anticipated tha
we will take possession of•the cash on or about March 14, 1988
and that the loan would be repaid on or about June 13, 1988•
FISCAL IMPACT:
$100,000 has been included in the 1987-88 budget to cover
the net anticipated interest expense and issuance costs for this
borrowing.
RECOMMENDATION:
ublic hearing, staff recommends the
After the required p re ared by Bond Counsel, so
adoption of thbefreceivedoforlaward by Phe Board of Supervisors
that bids may
at your March 8 meeting.
SUBMITTED BY :
/..m/r-rr,~/~
ohn M. Chambl ss, Jr.
Assistant County Administrator
APPROVED:
L~
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
-----------
____ --------------------- VOTE
-------
ACTION No yes Abs
Approved ( ) Motion by:
Denied ( ~
Received ( )
Referred
To
Garrett
Johnson
McGraw
Nickens
Robers
JMC/cw
Attachment
cc: Diane Hyatt
Fred Anderson
Sarah Rice
..~. ~r ~ "` ~ .
ODUNI.'Y OF ROANOKE
PUBLIC HEARING
NC7TIGE OF INTF3~TT TO ISSUE
R~1UE ANTICIPATION NOTES
at its
Please be advised that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
meeting on February 23, 1988, at the Roanoke County Administration Center,
3738 Brambleton Avenue, Roanoke, Virginia, at the evening session beginning
7.00 p.m. will hold a public hearing on the following matter, to-wit:
• F~2 TO ISSUE UP TO $10 MILLION REVF1`1UE ANTICI-
AUTHORIZING THE TREASUR
PATION NOTES TO COVER OPERST~ION~RCASH DEFICITS WHICH MAY BE EXPER
~D DURING THE CURRENT
All members of the public interested in the matter set forth above may
appear and be heard at the time and place aforesaid.
'~'1. ~
Paul M. Mahoney
County Attorney of
Roanoke County, Virginia
Publish on the following dates in the morning and evening editions:
Tuesday, February 9, 1988
Tuesday, February 16, 1988
Send invoice to:
Board of Supervisors
P. 0. Box 29800
Roanoke, Virginia 24018-0798
COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
~r~~~ ~ .c~~s
Pi~EL4~l~luRY DRAFT
DATED~~ ~3_
RESOLUTION
Date: 1988
At a regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors of the
County of Roanoke, Virginia, held on the day of
1988 the following persons were present or absent as shown:
PRESENT:
ABSENT:
On motion of
seconded by
the following Resolution was adopted by at least a majority of
the members of the Board of Supervisors by a roll call vote, the
ayes and nays being recorded as follows:
MEMBER VOTE
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE AND SALE OF THE COUNTY OF
ROANOKE, VIRGINIA, REVENUE ANTICIPATION NOTES IN THE AMOUNT OF
UP TO $10,000,000, AND APPROVING THE FORM AND DETAILS THEREOF
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors (the "Board") of the
County of Roanoke, Virginia (the "County") has determined that it
is necessary and expedient to borrow $10,000,000 and to issue its
revenue anticipation notes in an amount not to exceed $10,000,000
(the "Notes") to meet casual cash flow deficits of the County;
and
WHEREAS, the County desires to specify the form and
details of the Notes and authorize the County Administrator to
solicit bids from a limited number of potential investors for the
purchase of such Notes.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of
Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia:
1. The Board of the County determines that it is
advisable to contract a debt and issue and sell the Notes in an
aggregate principal amount of $10,000,000. The issuance and sale
of the Notes are authorized. The proceeds from the sale of the
Notes shall be used to meet casual cash flow deficits of the
County.
2. The Notes shall be issued in bearer form, without
privilege of registration and without coupons, in substantially
the form attached as Exhibit A. The Notes shall be dated
1988, shall be issued in denominations of 525,000
shall be numbered N-1 and upward, sequentially, shall bear
interest at a rate to be set by a subsequent resolution of this
1988.
Board payable at maturity, and shall mature on
~ ~~ ~
The Notes shall not be subject to payment or redemption before
maturity.
3. The full faith and credit of the County are pledged
to the payment at maturity of the principal of and interest on
the Notes. Unless other funds are lawfully available and
appropriated for the timely payment of the Bonds, there shall be
levied, without limitation as to rate or amount, and collected in
accordance with law, an annual ad valorem tax on all taxable
property in the County subject to local taxation sufficient to
provide for payment of the principal of and interest on the Notes
at maturity.
4. The County Administrator and Treasurer of the
County are hereby authorized and directed to execute the Notes,
and the Treasurer is hereby authorized to affix or imprint the
seal of the County on the Notes. The form of execution,
imprinting of the seal and attestation may be by facsimile;
provided, however, if the signatures of the County Administrator
and Treasurer are both by facsimile, the Notes shall not be valid
until authenticated by the manual signature of the Paying Agent.
In case any officer whcse signature or a facsimile of whose
signature shall appear on any Note shall cease to be such officer
before the delivery of the Notes, such signature or such
facsimile shall nevertheless be valid and sufficient for all
purposes the same as if he or she had remained in office until
such delivery. Any Note may bear the facsimile signature of or
may be signed by such persons as at the actual time of its
execution are the proper officers to sign such Note although at
~~ ~._
the date of delivery of such Note such persons may not have been
such officers. Upon receipt of payment therefor, the Treasurer
of the County or such agent as may be designated, shall issue and
deliver the Notes to the purchaser or purchasers thereof. The
officers and agents of the County are further authorized and
directed to do all acts required by the Notes and by this
Resolution for the full, punctual and complete performance of all
things necessary for this borrowing.
5 is appointed as Paying Agent for
the Notes. The principal of and interest on the Notes shall be
payable in lawful money of the United States upon surrender of
the Notes on the maturity date at the principal corporate trust
office of the Paying Agent in Virginia.
6. The Board agrees on behalf of the County that the
proceeds from the issuance and sale of the Notes will be invested
and expended as set forth in the Non-Arbitrage Certificate of the
County to be delivered at the time of the issuance and delivery
of the Notes and that the County will comply with the covenants
and representations contained therein. Further, the County shall
comply with the reporting requirements of Section 149(e) of the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.
7. The officers and advisors of the County are
authorized to solicit from a limited number of sophisticated
investors bids to purchase the Notes.
8. The officers and agents of the County are
authorized and directed to take such further action as may be
necessary or convenient in connection with the issuance, sale and
,~ ~ ~~ ~..
delivery of the Notes and all actions previously taken by such
officers and agents in connection therewith are ratified and
confirmed.
9. The appropriate officers and agents of the County
are authorized and directed to immediately cause a certified copy
of this Resolution, setting forth the form and details of the
Notes, to be filed with the Circuit Court of the County pursuant
to Section 15.1-199 and 15.1-212 of the Code of Virginia of 1950,
as amended, and the notice required by Section 15.1-199 of the
Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended, to be published.
10. This Resolution shall take effect immediately.
EXHIBIT A
N-
$25,000
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA
REVENUE ANTICIPATION NOTE
SERIES 1988
The COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA (the "County"), for value
received, acknowledges itself indebted and promises to pay to
BEARER upon presentation and surrender of this Note on
1988, the sum of TWENTY-FIVE THOUSAND DOLLARS
($25,000), together with interest thereon at the rate of
percent ( %) per annum
payable at maturity. Both the principal of and interest on this
Note are payable in lawful money of the United States of America
upon presentation and surrender of this Note at the principal
corporate trust office of
This Note is one of a series of Notes in the aggregate
principal amount of $10,000,000 authorized by the Board of
Supervisors of the County by resolutions adopted on
1988, and 1988 (the
"Resolutions"), pursuant to the Constitution and laws of the
Commonwealth of Virginia, and particularly Section 15.1-545 of
the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended, and is issued for the
purpose of meeting casual deficits in the revenue of the County
and creating a debt in anticipation of the collection of revenue
of the County. The full faith and credit of the County are
pledged to the payment of the principal of and interest on this
Note in accordance with its terms.
This Note is not subject to redemption before maturity.
It is certified and recited that all acts, conditions and
things required by the Constitution and statutes of the
Commonwealth of Virginia to happen, exist or be performed
precedent to the issuance of this Note have happened, existed or
been performed in due time, form and manner as so required and
that the indebtedness evidenced by this Note is within every debt
and other limit prescribed by the Constitution and statutes of
the Commonwealth of Virginia.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of Supervisors of the County
of Roanoke, Virginia, has caused this Note to be signed by the
,..z.. ~'~ . ~,~,
facsimile signature of its County Administrator and a facsimile
of the Seal of the County to be affixed and attested by the
facsimile signature of the Treasurer of the County and this Note
to be dated 1988.
COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA
By:
County Administrator,
County of Roanoke, Virginia
(SEAL)
ATTEST:
By
Treasurer, County of
Roanoke, Virginia
CERTIFICATE OF AUTHENTICATION
This Note is one of the Notes described in the within
mentioned Resolutions.
as Paying Agent
By:
Its Authorized Representative
-2-
A P P E A R A N 'C E R E Q U E S T
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
PUBLIC HEARING ON ~O O
I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to
recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so
that I may comment. I agree to follow the guidelines listed
below. WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND
ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD.
1. Each speaker will have between three and five minutes
available whether speaking as an individual or
representative. The chairman will decide the time limit
based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and
will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of
the Board to do otherwise.
2. Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of
view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by
the Chairman.
3. All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between
a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed.
4. Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all
times .
5. Speakers are requested to leave any written statements
and/or comments with the clerk.
6. INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL
FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP
ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM.
P L E A S E W R I T E L E G I B L Y
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
NAME:
ADDRESS:
~~~
PHONE : ~ ~~ -- ~ ~~ ,- l~ ~'~
i ~ i ~
PLEASE NOTE: (After filling out, give to the Deputy
Clerk. Thank you.)
A P P E A R A N C E R E Q U E S T
i
PUBLIC HEARING ON ,,`f~„+~~~Ys''-1~ ~~/~l,M~ll,c~a ~Cs~'C'o-t~=/' ~9~~r`
I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to
~~-~ ,~~~c's
recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so
that I may comment. I agree to follow the guidelines listed
below. WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND
ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD.
1. Each speaker will have between three and five minutes
available whether speaking as an individual or
representative. The chairman will decide the time limit
based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and
will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of
the Board to do otherwise.
2. Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of
view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by
the Chairman.
3. All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between
a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed.
4. Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all
times .
5. Speakers are requested to leave any written statements
and/or comments with the clerk.
6. INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL
FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP
ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM.
P L E A S E W R I T E L E G I B L Y
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
NAME : ~ %; ~~~. I Ker
ADDRESS : _ 3_s 1~~ S ~-~,~ .. ~,E,,~~~ ~ ~,~,~
<-~
PHONE : 7' ~L/-/~:~~,~
PLEASE NOTE: (After filling out, give to the Deputy
Clerk. Thank you.)
ITEM NUMBER ~8~7 - ~3
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
IN ROANOKE, VA., ON TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 23, 1988
MEETING DATE: February 23, 1988
SUBJECT: Public Hearing on the Issuance of General Obligation
Bonds not to exceed $3,985,000 to Assist in Financing
Renovations and Improvements to Back Creek Elementary
School and Bent Mountain Elementary School, and the
Adoption of a Resolution Authorizing the Issuance of
Said Bonds through the Virginia Public School Authority
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~
~ ""_> ~~ rti, 9
~ ~..~-~~
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
Section 15.1-171.1 of the Code of Virginia of 1950 as
amended requires the Board of Supervisors to hold a public
hearing prior to the issuance of bonds. The Board has previously
authorized the school administration and County staff to work
with the Virginia Public School Authority for the issuance of the
above referenced bonds to cover construction costs for the
improvements of Back Creek Elementary School and Bent Mountain
Elementary School.
The Virginia Public School Authority is scheduling a sale of
bonds during the week of March 21, and the required documentation
must be submitted to the authority by March 3 to participate. At
the present time, approximately 19 jurisdictions throughout the
Commonwealth of Virginia plan to participate in this upcoming
sale of approximately $67,000,000 of school activity bonds.
Representatives from the school administration are
present this evening to address questions concerning the proposed
facilities, which may be generated during the public hearing.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The debt service for the repayment of these bonds must be
included in the 1988-89 fiscal year budget and for the balance of
the 2U year repayment period.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that after the public hearing is held that
the attached draft resolution as prepared by McGuire, Woods,
Battle & Boothe be adopted and that staff be authorized to
,.288_~~
proceed work with the Virginia Public School Authority for the
issuance of said bonds. The final version of the resolution will
be available at the meeting on Tuesday, February 23 for adoption.
SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED:
.,
~ ~~ ~~
John M. Chambl'ss, Jr. Elmer C. Hodge
Assistant County Administrator County Administrator
------------------------------------------------------------------
ACTION VOTE
Approved ( ) Motion by• No Yes Abs
Denied ( )
Received ( )
Referred
To
JMC/cw
Attachment
cc: Diane
Sarah
Homer
Jerry
- Draft Resolution
Hyatt
Rice
Duf f
Hardy
Garrett
Johnson
McGraw
Nickens
Robers
- ~~
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE
OF $3,985,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION SCHOOL BONDS,
SERIES OF 1988 A, OF THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA
TO BE SOLD TO THE VIRGINIA PUBLIC SCHOOL AUTHORITY,
AND SETTING FORTH THE FORM AND DETAILS THEREOF
The Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke,
Virginia ("County") has determined that it is necessary and
expedient to borrow $3,985,000 and `to issue its general
obligation bonds therefor ("Bonds") to finance renovations and
improvements to Back Creek Elementary School and Bent Mountain
Elementary School.
The County has held a public hearing on the issuance of
the Bonds on February 23, 1988, in accordance with the
requirements of Section 15.1-171.1 of the Code of Virginia of
1950, as amended.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF
SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA:
1. The Board of Supervisors hereby determines that it
is advisable to contract a debt and to issue and sell the Bonds
in the amount of $3,985,000 for the purpose of financing
renovations and improvements to Back Creek Elementary School and
Bent Mountain Elementary School. The issuance and sale of the
Bonds upon terms established in this resolution of the Board of
Supervisors is hereby authorized.
2. It is hereby determined to be in the best interest
of the County and the Commonwealth of Virginia to accept the
offer of the Virginia Public School Authority ("VPSA") to
purchase the Bonds at par, upon the terms set forth in this
Resolution. The VPSA is an agency of the Commonwealth of
Virginia pursuant to Article VII, Section 10(b) of the
Constitution of Virginia prescribed by the General Assembly
pursuant to Section 22.1-166 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as
amended.
3. The appropriate officers of the County are hereby
authorized and directed to enter into a bond sale agreement with
the VPSA providing for the sale of the Bonds to the VPSA.
4. The County Administrator is hereby authorized and
directed to accept the interest rate or rates on the Bonds
established by VPSA, provided that such interest rate or rates
shall be equal to the interest rate or rates on the corresponding
bonds of the VPSA plus .10% and in any event the true interest
cost to the County shall not exceed 9% per annum.
5. The Bonds shall be issued in fully registered form
in denominations of $5,000 and whole multiples thereof; shall be
dated the date of issuance and delivery of the Bonds; shall be
~~~~
designated "COUNTY OF ROANOKE GENERAL OBLIGATION SCHOOL BONDS,
SERIES 1988 A", and shall bear interest payable semi-annually on
June 15 and December 15, beginning December 15, 1988, at the
rates established in accordance with paragraph 4 of this
Resolution, and shall mature in the amounts set forth below on
December 15 in each of the years 1988 to 2007 inclusive:
Year
Amrn~nt-
Year
Amount
1988 $110,000 1998 $230,000
1989 180,000 1999 230,000
1990 185,000 2000 230,000
1991 225,000 2001 235,000
1992 225,000 2002 210,000
1993 225,000 2003 160,000
1994 240,000 2004 220,000
1995 240,000 2005 175,000
1996 240,000 2006 100,000
1997 240,000 2007 85,000
The Bonds shall be in substantially the form attached hereto
as Exhibit A.
6. Bonds maturing on or before December 15, 1998 are
not subject to redemption prior to maturity. Bonds maturing
after December 15, 1998 are subject to redemption at the option
of the County prior to maturity in whole, but not in part, on any
business day on or after December 15, 1998, from any moneys that
may be made available for such purpose, at the redemption price
indicated below, expressed as a percentage of the principal
amount of each Bond to be redeemed, together with accrued
interest thereon to the redemption date:
Dates (Inclusive
December 15, 1998 to
December 14, 1999
December 15, 1999 to
December 14, 2000
December 15, 2000 to
December 14, 2001
December 15, 2001 and
thereafter
Redemt~tion Price
103%
102
101
100
Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions, so long as the
Bonds are held by the VPSA, the Bonds shall not be subject to
redemption prior to maturity without the prior written consent of
the VPSA.
The Treasurer of the County shall mail notice of any such
redemption prior to maturity by registered or certified mail at
least 30 days prior to the date fixed for redemption to the
-2-
wM-
registered owner of any Bond to be redeemed at such owner's
address as it appears on the registration books kept by the
Treasurer as of the close of business on the 45th day preceding
the date fixed for redemption. Such notice shall specify the
redemption date and price, the place where such Bonds are to be
surrendered for payment and that on the redemption date the
redemption price will become due and payable on the Bonds and
interest thereon shall cease to accrue from and after the
redemption date.
7. The Chairman and the Clerk of the Board are
authorized and directed to execute appropriate negotiable Bonds
in the aggregate principal amount of $3,985,000 and to affix the
seal of the County thereto. The manner of execution and
affixation of the seal may be by facsimile, provided, however,
that if the signatures of the Chairman and the Clerk are both by
facsimile, the Bonds shall not be valid until signed at the foot
thereof by the manual signature of the Bond Registrar.
8. The Treasurer of the County is hereby appointed
Bond Registrar for the Bonds and is authorized and directed to
take all action necessary to fulfill such appointment.
9. The full faith and credit of the County are hereby
irrevocably pledged for the payment of principal of, premium, if
any, and interest on the Bonds. There shall be levied and
collected annually on all locally taxable property in the County
an ad valorem tax over and above all other taxes authorized or
limited by law sufficient to pay such principal, premium, if any,
and interest as the same respectively become due and payable
unless other funds are lawfully available and appropriated for
the timely payment thereof.
10. The Clerk of
authorized and directed to
resolution to be presented
Roanoke and filed with its
shall not be issued by the
School Board shall have ad
consenting to the issuance
the Board of Supervisors is hereby
cause a certified copy of this
to the School Board of the County of
Clerk. The Bonds hereby authorized
Board of Supervisors until the County
opted an appropriate resolution
of the Bonds.
11. The appropriate officers and agents of the County
are hereby authorized and directed to execute a Non-Arbitrage
Certificate and Tax Covenants setting forth the expected use and
investment of the proceeds of the Bonds and containing such
covenants as may be necessary in order to show compliance with
the provisions of Section 148 of the Internal Revenue Code of
1986, as amended, and applicable regulations relating to
"arbitrage bonds." The Board of Supervisors of the County
covenants on behalf of the County that the proceeds from the
issuance and sale of the Bonds will be invested and expended as
set forth in such Non-Arbitrage Certificate and Tax Covenants and
that the County shall comply with the other covenants and
representations contained therein. The appropriate officers of
-3-
2~~.1
the County are hereby authorized and directed to execute and
deliver the Proceeds Agreement with respect to the deposit and
investment of proceeds of the Bonds in the form approved by the
County Attorney, among the County, the other participants in the
VPSA bond sale, the VPSA and the financial institution designated
therein as depository.
12.
designated Paying Agent for the Bonds.
Virginia is hereby
13. Appropriate officers or agents of the County are
hereby authorized and directed to cause a certified copy of this
resolution to be filed with the Circuit Court of the County of
Roanoke and within ten days thereafter to cause to be published
once in a newspaper having general circulation in the County a
notice setting forth (1) in brief and general terms the purposes
for which the Bonds are to be issued and (2) the amount of such
Bonds.
14. Each member of the Board of Supervisors and all
other officers and employees of the County are hereby authorized
to take such action as they or any one of them may consider
necessary or desirable in connection with the issuance and sale
of the Bonds and any such action previously taken is hereby
ratified and confirmed.
15. This resolution shall take effect immediately.
The undersigned Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of the
County of Roanoke, Virginia, hereby certifies that the foregoing
constitutes a true and correct extract from the minutes of a
meeting of the Board of Supervisors held on February 23, 1988,
and of the whole thereof so far as applicable to the matters
referred to in such extract.
WITNESS MY HAND and the seal of the Board of Supervisors of
the County of Roanoke, this _ day of February, 1988.
Clerk, Board of Supervisors
of the County of Roanoke
Copies to:
Bond Counsel
Circuit Court Judge
School Board Clerk
County Treasurer
-4-
.2. ,~, ` ~ ,~,
EXHIBIT A
(FORM OF BOND)
NO. R-
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
COUNTY OF ROANOKE
General Obligation School Bond, Series 1988 A
MATURITY DATE
REGISTERED OWNER
PRINCIPAL AMOUNT
INTEREST RATE
The County of Roanoke, Virginia (the "County"), for value
received, hereby acknowledges itself indebted and promises to pay
to the registered owner hereof or legal representative, the
principal amount stated above upon presentation and surrender
hereof on the maturity date set forth above and to pay interest
from the date hereof to maturity at the rate specified above per
year, payable semiannually on June 15 and December 15, beginning
on December 15, 1988. Both principal of and interest on this
Bond are payable in lawful money of the United States of America.
The principal of this Bond is payable upon presentation and
surrender hereof at the principal office of
Virginia,
as Paying Agent. Interest on this Bond is payable by check or
draft mailed to the registered owner hereof at its address as it
appears on the registration books maintained by the Treasurer of
the County, or any successor registrar, as Bond Registrar,
` ~ ~` ~e
without presentation of this Bond. All interest payments shall
be made to the registered owner as it appears on the registration
books kept by the Bond Registrar on the fifteenth day of the
month preceding each interest payment date.
This Bond is one of an issue of $3,985,000 County of Roanoke
General Obligation School Bonds, Series 1988 A (the "Bonds"), of
like date and tenor, except as to number, interest rate,
denomination and maturity, and issued pursuant to Article VII,
Section 10(b) of the Constitution of Virginia and the statutes
thereof, including the Public Finance Act, Chapter 5, Title 15.1
of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended, and resolutions duly
adopted by the Board of Supervisors of the County pursuant
thereto, to provide funds for capital projects for school
purposes.
The Bonds are issuable as fully registered bonds in
denominations of $5,000 and whole multiples thereof. This Bond
may be exchanged at the office of the Bond Registrar for an equal
aggregate principal amount of registered bonds of the
denomination of $5,000 each or whole multiples thereof, of the
same maturity and bearing interest at the same rate.
The Treasurer of the County is designated as the Bond
Registrar. The Board of Supervisors may designate a substitute
Bond Registrar upon written notice specifying the name and
address of such substitute Bond Registrar mailed to the
registered owners of the Bonds at their addresses appearing on
the registration books maintained by the Bond Registrar.
-2-
z~8--~3
This Bond may be transferred only by an assignment duly
executed by the registered owner hereof or such owner's attorney
or legal representative in a'form satisfactory to the Bond
Registrar. Such transfer shall be made on the registration books
kept by the Bond Registrar upon presentation and surrender hereof
and the County shall execute a new Bond or Bonds having an equal
aggregate principal amount, in authorized denominations, of the
same form and maturity, bearing interest at the same rate, and
registered in names as requested by the then registered owner
hereof or such owner's attorney or legal representative. Any
such exchange shall be at the expense of the County, except that
the Bond Registrar may charge the person requesting such exchange
the amount of any tax or other governmental charge required to be
paid with respect thereto.
The Bond Registrar, the County and the Paying Agent shall
treat the registered owner as the person exclusively entitled to
payment of principal and interest and the exercise of all other
rights and powers of the owner, except that interest payments
shall be made to the person shown as the owner on the
registration books on the 15th day of the month preceding each
interest payment date.
Bonds maturing on or before December 15, 1998, are not
subject to redemption prior to maturity. Bands maturing after
December 15, 1998 are subject to redemption at the option of the
County prior to maturity in whole, but not in part, on any
business day on or after December 15, 1998, from any moneys that
may be made available for such purpose, at the redemption price
-3-
_- ~`',"
indicated below, expressed as a percentage of the principal
amount of each Bond to be redeemed,_together with accrued
interest thereon to the redemption date:
Dates (Inclusive
December 15, 1998 to
December 14, 1999
December 15, 1999 to
December 14, 2000
December 15, 2000 to
December 14, 2001
December 15, 2001 and
thereafter
Redemption Price
103%
102
101
100
Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions, so long as the
Bonds are held by the Virginia Public School Authority, the Bonds
shall not be subject to redemption prior to maturity without the
prior written consent of the Virginia Public School Authority.
If the Bonds are called for redemption, the Bond Registrar
shall mail notice of redemption of this Bond by certified or
registered mail not less than 30 days before the redemption date
to the registered owner hereof at the address indicated on the
registration books to be maintained by the Bond Registrar on the
45th day preceding the redemption date, but failure to mail such
notice shall not affect the validity of the proceedings for
redemption. Provided funds for their redemption are on deposit
at the place of payment on the redemption date, all Bonds so
called for redemption shall cease to bear interest on such date
and shall not be deemed to be outstanding.
The full faith and credit of the County are irrevocably
pledged for the payment of principal of, premium, if any, and
interest on this Bond.
-4-
.~- ~ ~,:
All acts, conditions and things required by the Constitution
and statutes of the Commonwealth of Virginia to happen, exist or
be performed precedent to and in the issuance of this Bond have
happened, exist and have been performed, and the issue of Bonds
of which this is one, together with all other indebtedness of the
County, is within every debt and other limit prescribed by the
Constitution and statutes of the Commonwealth of Virginia.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of Supervisors of the County
of Roanoke has caused this Bond to be signed by its Chairman, its
seal to be affixed hereto or a facsimile printed hereon and
attested by the signature of its Clerk, and this Bond to be dated
1988.
(SEAL)
ATTEST:
Clerk, Board of Supervisors
of the County of Roanoke
COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA
By
Chairman, Board of Supervisors
of the County of Roanoke
-5-
ASSIGNMENT
FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned sells, assigns and
transfers unto
(PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS, INCLUDING ZIP CODE,
OF ASSIGNEE)
PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER
IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE:
the within Bond and does hereby irrevocably constitute and
appoint
attorney to
transfer the said Bond on the books kept for registration of said
Bond, with full power of substitution in the premises.
Dated:
Registered Owner
(NOTICE: The signature above
must correspond with the name
of the Registered Owner as it
appears on the front of this
Bond in every particular,
without alteration or change.)
Signature Guaranteed:
(NOTICE: Signature(s) must be
guaranteed by a member firm of
the New York Stock Exchange or
a commercial bank or trust
company.)
-6-
w.A
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF Tf3E BOARD O.F SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINIS`T'RATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 23, 1988
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE
OF $3,985,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION SCHOOL BONDS,
SERIES OF 1988 A, OF THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA
TO BE SOLD TO THE VIRGINIA PUBLIC SCHOOL AUTHORITY,
AND SETTING FORTH THE FORM AND DETAILS THEREOF
The Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke,
Virginia ("County") has determined that it is necessary and
expedient to borrow $3,985,000 and to issue its general
obligation bonds therefore ("Bonds") to finance renovations and
improvements to Back Creek Elementary School and Bent Mountain
Elementary School.
The County has held a public hearing on the issuance of
the Bonds on February 23, 1988, in accordance with the
requirements cf Section 15.1-171.1 of the Code of Virginia of
1950, as amended.
NOW, TIIEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF
SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA:
1. The Board of Supervisors hereby determines that it
is advisable to contract a debt and to issue and sell the Bonds
in the amount of $3,985,000 for the purpose of financing
renovations and improvements to Back Creek Elementary School and
Bent Mountain Elementary School. The issuance and sale of the
Bonds upon terms established in this resolution of the Board of
Supervisors is hereby authorized.
2. It is hereby determined to be in the best interest
of the County and the Commonwealth of Virginia to accept the
offer of the Virginia Public School Authority ("VPSA") to
purchase the Bonds at par, upon the terms set forth in this
Resolution. The VPSA is an agency of the Commonwealth of
Virginia pursuant to Article VII, Section 10(b) of the
Consti.tuti.on of Virginia prescribed by the General Assembly
pursuant to Section 22.1-166 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as
amended.
3. The appropriate officers of the County are hereby
authorized and directed to enter into a bond sale agreement with
the VPSA providing for the sale of the Bonds to the VPSA.
4. The County Administrator is hereby authorized and
directed to 4ccept the interest rate or rates on the Bonds
established by VPSA, provided that such interest rate or rates
shall be equal to the interest rate or rates on the corresponding
bonds of the ~~'PSA plus .10o and in any event the true interest
cost to the County shall not exceed 9o per annum.
1
5. The Bonds shall be issued in fully registered form
in denominations of $5,000 and whole multiples thereof; shall be
dated the date of issuance and delivery of the Bonds; shall be
designated "COUNTY OF ROANOKE GENERAL OBLIGATION SCHOOL BONUS,
SERIES 1988 A", and shall bear interest payable semi-annually on
June 15 and December 15, beginning December 15, 1988, at the
rates established in accordance with paragraph 4 of this
Resolution, anu shal]. mature in the amounts set forth below on
December 15 in each of the years 1988 to 2007 inclusive:
Year Amount Year Amount
1988 $110,000 1998 $230,000
1989 180,000 1999 230,000
1990 185,000 2000 230,000
1991 225,000 2001 235,000
.1992 225,000 2002 210,000
1993 225,000 2003 160,000
1994 240,000 2004 220,000
1995 240,000 2005 175,000
1996 240,000 2006 100,000
1997 240,000 2007 85,000
The Bonds shall be in substantially the form attached hereto
as Exhibit A.
6. Bonds maturing on or before December 15, 1998 are
not subject to redemption prior to maturity. Bonds maturing
after December 15, 1998 are subject to redemption at the option
of the County prior to maturity in whole, but not in part, on any
business day on or after December 15, 1998, from any moneys that
may be made available for such purpose, at the redemption price
indicated below, expressed as a percentage of the principal
amount of each Bond to be redeemed, together with accrued
interest thereon to the redemption date:
Dates (Inclusive
December 15, 1998 to
December 14, 1999
December 15, 1999 to
December 14, 2000
December 15, 2000 to
December 14, 2001
December 15, 2001 and
thereafter
Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions, so long as
Bonds are held by the VPSA, the Bonds shall not be subject
redemption prior to maturity without the prior written consent
the VPSA.
Redemption Price
103%
102
101
100
the
to
of
2
The Treasurer of the County shall mail notice of any such
redemption prior to maturity by registered or certified mail at
least 30 days prior to the date fixed for redemption to the
registered owner of any Bond to be redeemed at such owner's
address as it appears on the registration books kept by the
Treasurer as of the close of business on the 45th day preceding
the date fixed for redemption. Such notice shall specify the
redemption date and price, the place where such Bonds are to be
surrendered for payment and that on the redemption date the
redemption price will become due and payable on the Bonds and
interest thereon shall cease to accrue from and after the
redemption date.
7. The Chairman and the Clerk of_ the Board are
authorized and directed to execute appropriate negotiable Bonds
in the aggregate principal amount of $3,985,000 and to affix the
seal of the County thereto. The manner of execution and
affixation of the seal may be by facsimile, provided, however,
that if the signatures of the Chairman and the Clerk are both by
facsimile, the Bonds shall not be valid until signed at the foot
thereof by the manual signature of the Bond Registrar.
8. Crestar Bank, Richmond, Virginia, is hereby
appointed Bond Registrar for the Bonds and is authorized and
directed to take all action necessary to fulfill such
appointment.
9. The full faith and credit of the County ar.e hereby
irrevocably pledged for the payment of principal of, premium, if
any, and interest on the Bonds. There shall be levied and
collected annually on all locally taxable property in the County
an ad valorem tax over and above all other taxes authorized or
limited by law sufficient to pay such principal, premium, if any,
and interest as the same respectively become due and payable
unless other f~znds are lawfully available and appropriated for
the timely payment thereof.
10. The Clerk of the Board of Supervisors is hereby
authorized and directed to cause a certified copy of this
resolution to be presented to the School Board of the County of
Roanoke and filed with its Clerk. The Bonds hereby authorized
shall not be issued by the Board of Supervisors until the County
School Board shall have adopted an appropriate resolution
consenting to the issuance of the Bonds.
11. The appropriate officers and agents of the County
are hereby authorized and directed to execute a Non-Arbitrage
Certificate and Tax Covenants setting forth the expected use and
investment of the proceeds of the Bonds and containing such
covenants as may be necessary in order to show compliance with
the provisions of Section 148 of the Internal Revenue Code of
1986, as amended, and applicable regulations relating to
"arbitrage bonds." The Board of Supervisors of the County
covenants on behalf of the County that the proceeds from the
3
issuance and sale of the Bonds will be invested and expended as
set forth in such Non-Arbitrage Certificate and Tax Covenants and
that the County shall comply with the other covenants and
representations contained therein. The appropriate officers of
the County arm hereby authorized and directed to execute and
deliver the Proceeds Agreement with respect to the deposit and
investment of proceeds of the Bonds in the form approved by the
County Attorney, among the County, the other participants in the
VPSA bond sale, the VPSA and the financial institution designated
therein as depository.
12. Crestar Bank, Richmond, Virginia is hereby
designated Paying Agent for the Bonds.
13. Appropriate officers or agents of the County are
hereby authorized and directed to cause a certified copy of this
resolution to ae filed with the Circuit Court of the County of
Roanoke and within ten days thereafter to cause to be published
once in a newspaper having general circulation in the County a
notice setting forth (1) in brief and general terms the purposes
for which the Bonds are to be issued and ( 2 ) the amount of such
Bonds.
14. Each member of the Board of Supervisors and all
other officers and employees of the County are hereby authorized
to take such action as they or any one of them may consider
necessary or desirable in connection with the issuance and sale
of the Bonds and any such action previously taken is hereby
ratified and confirmed.
15. This resolution shall take effect immediately.
The undersigned Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of the
County of Roanoke, Virginia, hereby certifies that the foregoing
constitutes a true and correct extract from the m.i_nutes of a
meeting of the Board of Supervisors held on February 23, 1988,
and of the whole thereof so far as applicable to the matters
referred to in such extract.
WITNESS MY HAND and the seal of the Board of Supervisors of
the County of Roanoke, this 23rd day of February, 1988.
Clerk, Board of Supervisors
of the County of Roanoke
Copies to:
Bond Counsel
Circuit Court Judge
School Board Clerk
County Treasurer
4
NO. R-
EXHIBIT A
(FORM OF BOND)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
COUNTY OF ROANOKE
General Obli ation School Bond, Series 1988 A
MATURITY DATE
REGISTERED OWNLR
PRINCIPAL AMOUNT
INTEREST RATE
The County of Roanoke, Virginia (the "County"), for value
received, hereby acknowledges itself indebted and promises to pay
to the registered owner hereof or legal representative, the
principal amount stated above upon presentation and surrender
hereof on the maturity date set forth above and to pay interest
from the date hereof to maturity at the rate specified above per
year, payable semiannually on June 15 and December 15, beginning
on December 15, 1988. Both principal of and interest on this
Bond are payable in lawful money of the United States of America.
The principal of this Bond is payable upon presentation and
surrender hereof at the principal office of Crestar Bank_
Richmond, Virginia, as Paying Agent. Interest on this Bond is
payable by check or draft mailed to the registered owner hereof
at its address as it appears on the registration books maintained
by the Bond Registrar, Crestar Bank, Richmond, Virginia, or any
1
successor registrar, as Bond Registrar, without presentation of
this Bond. All interest payments shall be made to the registered
owner as it appears on the registration books kept by the Bond
Registrar on the fifteenth day of the month preceding each
interest payment date.
This Bond is one of an issue of $3,985,000 County of Roanoke
General Obligation School Bonds, Series 1988 A (the "Bonds"), of
like date and tenor, except as to number, interest rate,
denomination and maturity, and issued pursuant to Article VII,
Section 10(b) of the Constitution of Virginia and the statutes
thereof, including the Public Finance Act, Chapter 5, Title 15.1
of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended, and resolutions duly
adopted by the Board of Supervisors of the County pursuant
thereto, to provide funds for capital projects for school
purposes.
The Bonds are issuable as fully registered bonds in
denominations of $5,000 and whole multiples thereof. This Bond
may be exchanged at the office of the Bond Registrar for an equal
aggregate principal amount of registered bonds of the
denomination of $5,000 each or whole multiples thereof, of the
same maturity and bearing interest at the same rate.
Crestar Bank, Richmond, Virginia, is designated as the Bond
Registrar. The Board of Supervisors may designate a substitute
Bond Registrar upon written notice specifying the name and
address of such substitute Bond Registrar mailed to the
registered owners of the Bonds at their addresses appearing on
the registration books maintained by the Bond Registrar.
2
This Bond may be transferred only by an assignment duly
executed by the registered owner hereof or such owner's attorney
or legal representative in a form satisfactory to the Bond
Registrar. Surh transfer shall be made on the registration books
kept by the Bond Registrar upon presentation and surrender hereof
and the County shall execute a new Bond or Bonds having an equal
aggregate principal amount, in authorized denominations, of the
same form and maturity, bearing interest at the same rate, and
registered in names as requested by the then registered owner
hereof or sucl. owner's attorney or legal representative. Any
such exchange shall be at the expense of the County, except that
the Bond Registrar may charge the person requesting such exchange
the amount of any tax or other governmental charge required to be
paid with respect thereto.
The Bond Registrar, the County and the Paying Agent shall
treat the registered owner as the person exclusively entitled to
payment of principal and interest and the exercise of all other
rights and powers of the owner, except that interest payments
shall be made to the person shown as the owner on the
registration books on the 15th day of the month preceding each
interest payment date.
Bonds maturing on or before December 15, 1988, are not
subject to redemption prior to maturity. Bonds maturing after
December 15, 1998 are subject to redemption at the option of the
County prior to maturity in whole, but not in part, on any
business day on or after December 15, 1998, from any moneys that
may be made available for such purpose, at the redemption price
3
indicated below, expressed as a percentage of the principal
amount of each Bond to be redeemed, together with accrued
interest thereon to the redemption date:
Dates (Inclusive) Redemption Price
December 15, 1998 to
December 14, 1999 103%
December 15, 1999 to
December 14, 2000 102
December 15, 2000 to
December 14, 2001 101
December 15, 2001 and
thereafter 100
Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions, so long as the
Bonds are held by the Virginia Public School Authority, the Bonds
shall not be subject to redemption prior to maturity without the
prior written consent of the Virginia Public School Authority.
If the Bonds are called for redemption, the Bond Registrar
shall mail notice of redemption of this Bond by certified or
registered mail not less than 30 days before the redemption date
to the registered owner hereof at the address indicated on the
registration books to be maintained by the Bond Registrar on the
45th day preceding the redemption date, but failure to mail such
notice shall not affect the validity of the proceedings for
redemption. Provided funds for their redemption are on deposit
at the place of payment on the redemption date, all Bonds so
called for redemption shall cease to bear interest on such date
and shall not be deemed to be outstanding.
The full faith and credit of the County are irrevocably
pledged for the payment of principal of, premium, if any, and
interest on this Bond.
4
All acts, conditions and things required by the Constitution
and statutes of the Commonwealth of Virginia to happen, exist or
be performed precedent to and in the issuance of this Bond have
happened, exist and have been performed, and the issue of Bonds
of which this is one, together with al)_ other indebtedness of the
County, is within every debt and other limit prescribed by the
Constitution and statutes of the Commonwealth of Virginia.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of Supervisors of the County
of Roanoke hay caused this Bond to be signed by its Chairman, its
seal to be affixed hereto or a facsimile printed hereon and
attested by the signature of its Clerk, and this Bond to be dated
1988.
COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA
(SEAL)
ATTEST:
By
Clerk, Board of Supervisors Chairman, Board of Supervisors
of the County of Roanoke of the County of Roanoke
5
ASSIGNMENT
FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned sells, assigns and
transfers unto
(PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS, INCLUDING ZIP CODE,
OF ASSIGNEE)
PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER
IllENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE:
the within Bond and does hereby irrevocably constitute and
appoint
attorney to
transfer the said Bond on the books kept for registration of said
Bond, with full power of substitution in the premises.
Dated:
Signature Guaranteed:
(NOTICE: Signature(s) must be
guaranteed by a member firm of
the New York Stock Exchange or
a commercial bank or trust
company.)
Registered Owner
(NOTICE: The signature above
must correspond with the name
of the Registered Owner as it
appears on the front of this
Bond in every particular,
without alteration or change.)
6
A P P`E A R A~N C'E R E Q U E S T
PUBLIC HEARING ON ~ ~(~ `/,~
I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to
recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so
that I may comment. I agree to follow the guidelines listed
below. WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND
ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD.
1. Each speaker will have between three and five minutes
available whether speaking as an individual or
representative. The chairman will decide the time limit
based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and
will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of
the Board to do otherwise.
2. Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of
view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by
the Chairman.
3. All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between
a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed.
4. Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all
times .
5. Speakers are requested to leave any written statements
and/or comments with the clerk.
6. INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL
FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP
ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM.
P L E A S E W R I T E L E G I B L Y
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
NAME : ~Nr//I ~ . ~ /~ ~{./£. ~ ~~ ES ~i9t ~~ ~~2£ t,~ T
ADDRESS : _ -7'-73 G ~iE'_E~/~ C/.Pc t_
PHONE: 77 y- c~/~`~
PLEASE NOTE: (After filling out, give to the Deputy
Clerk. Thank you.)
ITEM NUMBER ~'~'~
AT A REGUINIAMHELDNAT THEHROANOKE OCOUNTYEADMINISTRATIONNCENTER
COUNTY, VIRG
MEETING DATE: February 23, 1988
SUBJECT: Orda~en~o establishnroaderighteofnwayoforuMeadewoodl
es
Drive and Quail Place.
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
(~.~.~~ N
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
Roanoke County has recently completed the sale of property
to Shimchock's Litho Service, Inc. The property is located along
Hollins Road adjacent to Amp, Inc. After the sale of this
property, the County still retains 8.8 acres to the west and
behind the Shimchock property. The County has covenanted th th e
minimum of 8 acres of this property will be retained by
County for recreational or park usage. In addition, the
conveyance on the property prohibit the future extension of
Meadewood Drive through this property to Hollins Road. Staff has
notifive reseonse to the dedic tion ofrthisnaa d for ul deesac no
negat P
right-of-way.
The 1985 Road Bond was approved by the Board of Supervisors
and one of the priority projects to be completed under that bond
was the upgrade of Meadewood Orive and Quail Place to allow the
roads to be brought into the State Secondary Road System. The
County is responsible to insure that there is adequate
right-of-way and drainage easements along these road projects
prior to the Virginia Department of Transportation taking over
the roads and completing the necessary improvements. In the case
of Meadewood Drive, there is a need for a cul-de-sac to allow for
turnaround of vehicular traffic at the end of the street. The
Meadewood subdivision borders the 8.8 acre tract of County
property. Due to the construction of homes on the last two lots
of Meadewood Drive, there is not adequate room to provide a
cul-de-sac withi t of the lfuturebparkaareana orethisrculhdensaa
to acquire par
right-of-way.
The right-of-way required for Meadewood Drive would not be
in excess of 0.25 acres which would allow the remaining property
to meet the minimum of 8 acres remaining for park and
recreational use.
/`~ -- /
Section 18.04 of the County charter requires that any
disposal of public property be accomplished by ordinance. The
first reading of a proposed ordinance would be held during the
February 23„ 1988 meeting with the second reading to be held
March 8, 1988.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Any cost associated with platting and recording of the
right-of-way would be covered by the 1985 Road Bond Funds.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff makes the following recommendations:
1. That the Board of Supervisors reaffirm that this parcel
of land is surplus, available for other public uses, and
would be donated for public right-of-way for roads.
2. That the Board of Supervisors conduct the first reading
for the proposed ordinance.
3. That the County Administrator be authorized to execute
such documents and take such actions on behalf of
Roanoke County as necessary to accomplish the conveyance
of said property upon final approval by the Board of
Supervisors.
SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED:
Phillip T. Henry Elmer C. Ho e
Director of Engineering County Administrator
-------------------------------------
ACTION
Approved ( ) Motion by: Garrett
Denied ( ) Johnson
Received ( ) McGraw
Referred Nickens
To
Robers
VOTE
No Yes Abs
2
_ Y ,' _ `~
~ 11~ N~~oow~ ~ a~ ~,' i ti~~p 601 tk is
N~l ~d~' `'` ~ 99~b ~ ~ ~` ~ A ~ ~ wa °. e°~,° ~ 1511
i ~ ~ tl~5~tlrNYegWK ~ a4~ ~../{ .~'i ~~Mgpp ?/ i•
F' ERt~~ _ o
ar', RDEN9i ~ j~ {^/~
.a(rti«"~4~~ - 4„~,w~' ,~'' VICINITY MAP ~ I~~ x. •-'
N
NORTH
Roanoke County Property West of Shimchock
PUBLIC FACILITIES Proposed right-of-way for cul-de-sac
~- /
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 23, 1988
ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE CONVEYANCE OF
SURPLUS REAL ESTATE TO ES'T'ABLISH ROAD
RIGHT OF WAY FOR MEADEWOOD DRIVE AND
QUAIL PLACE
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.01 of
the Charter of Roanoke County, the subject property has been
declared to be surplus and is being made available for other
public uses, i.e., a public street; and
2. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of
the Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading concerning the
disposition of the hereinafter described real estate was held on
February 23, 1988; a second reading was held on March 8, 1988;
and
3. That the County is responsible to ensure that there
is adequate right of way and drainage easements along
Meadewood Drive and Quail Place to allow these roads to be
brought into the state secondary road system and accepted by the
Virginia Department of Transportation; and
4. That this real estate is located west of Hollins
Road and adjacent to Shimchock's Litho Service, Inc., and
consists of 0.25 acres in permanent easement; and
5. That Roanoke County is donating the subject
property to the Virginia Department of Transportation for public
road right of way purposes; and
~y_ /
6. That the County Administrator is authorized to
execute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke
County as are necessary to accomplish the conveyance of said
property, all of which shall be upon form approved by the County
Attorney.
ITEM ~ -~
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
IN ROANOKE, VA., ON TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 23, 1988
MEETING DATE: February 23, 198$
SUBJECT: public Hearing and Consideration of an Ordinance
Amending Section 21-73 of the Roanoke County Code,
"Exemption for Elderly and Disabled Persons," and
Re-enacting Same to Increase the Total Combined Income
and Total Combined Net Worth Provisions
COUNTY ADMI,~NISTRATOR/,'S COMMENTS:
Gee-wnz,n,z,,,,.r~' ~:~,~,~r ~ ..7~ ~.,~.t,~~ ~~.~%~'j ~ C~cn,tiw~
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION : ''~GL ~~'~'""/ "~ ~~-u~`~ ~ ~~~`' " "~~
v~~ ..~~ .
At the January 26 meeting of the Board of Supervisors, it
was suggested that the total combined income provision for all
taxpayers of the above referenced ordinance be increased from
$18,000 to $22,000 and that the net worth provision be increased
from $65,000 to $75,000. The attached ordinance as prepared by
the County Attorney serves this purpose and makes the provisions
effective for the 1988 tax year.
FISCAL IMPACT:
During the 1987 tax year, $269,274 tax credit was allowed by
the County of Roanoke to its citizens who
provisions of this section of the County Code andithe ne di mpact
of this change for both the current fiscal year and also the
subsequent fiscal year is deemed to be minimal ($2,000 -
$1U,000), since the exemption applies to the increment in taxes
over the base year.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the public hearing for citizen input
be held and the second reading of the ordinance be approved so
that the benefits will be effective for the 1988 tax year.
SUBMITTED BY:
APPROVED:
~~ ~ ~~
ohn M. Chamblis~ Jr.
Assistant County Administrator
Elm r C. dg
County Administrator
•-
----------
--------------VOTE-------
ACZION
Approved ( ) Motion by:
Denied ( ) No Yes Abs
Received ( ) Garrett
Referred Johnson
To McGraw
Nickens
Robers
JMC/cw
cc: Wayne Compton
Paul Mahoney
Attachment
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER, ON TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 23, 1988
ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 21-73 OF THE
ROANOKE COUNTY CODE, "EXEMPTION FOR
ELDERLY AND DISABLED PERSONS," AND RE-
ENACTING SAME, TO INCREASE THE TOTAL
COMBINED INCOME AND TOTAL COMBINED NET
WORTH PROVISIONS
WHEREAS, Section 21-73 of the Roanoke County Code estab-
lishes the restrictions upon the total combined income at $15,000
and the net combined financial worth at $55,000 for the exemption
from or deferral of real estate taxes for certain elderly or per-
manently and totally disabled persons; and
WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 84-232 adopted on December 18,
1984, increased these financial restrictions to $18,000 and
$65,000, respectively; and
WHEREAS, the General Assembly for the Commonwealth of
Virginia amended Section 58.1-3211 of the 1950 Code of Virginia,
in 1987, to increase these financial restrictions to $22,000 and
$75,000, respectively; and
WHEREAS, the first reading on this ordinance was held
on February 9, 1988, and the second reading was held on
February 23, 1988.
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That Section 21-73 of the Roanoke County Code be
amended and reenacted to read and provide as follows:
Sec. 21-73. General prerequisites to grant.
Exemptions provided for in this division shall be
granted only if the following conditions are met:
,.~
(1) That the total combined income, during the imme-
diately preceding calendar year, from all sources,
of the owner of the dwelling and his relatives
living therein did not exceed eigl~~een- tl~eusar~d
della~e- {$18~AAA} twenty-two thousand dollars
($22,000); provided, however, that the first four
thousand dollars ($4,000) of income of each rela-
tive, other than the spouse of the owner, who is
living in the dwelling shall not be included in
such total.
(2) That the owner and his spouse did not have a total
combined net worth, including all equitable inter-
ests, exceeding sixty-fire- thensand- dollars
{$65;AAA} seventy-five thousand dollars
($5.000) as of December 31 of the immediately
preceding calendar year. The amount of net worth
specified herein shall not include the value of
the sole dwelling house and up to one acre of
land.
2. That this ordinance shall be effective for the 1988
tax year.
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER, ON TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 23, 1988
ORDINANCE 22388-9 AMENDING SECTION
21-73 OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE,
"EXEMPTION FOR ELDERLY AND DISABLED
PERSONS," AND REENACTING SAME, TO
INCREASE THE TOTAL COMBINED INCOME AND
TOTAL COMBINED NET WORTH PROVISIONS
WHEREAS, Section 21-73 of the Roanoke County Code estab-
lishes the restrictions upon the total combined income at $15,000
and the net combined financial worth at $55,000 for the exemption
from or deferral of real estate taxes for certain elderly or per-
manently and totally disabled persons; and
WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 84-232 adopted on December 18,
1984, increased these financial restrictions to $18,000 and
$65,000, respectively; and
WHEREAS, the General Assembly for the Commonwealth of
Virginia amended Section 58.1-3211 of the 1950 Code of Virginia,
in 1987, to increase these financial restrictions to $22,000 and
$75,000, respectively; and
WHEREAS, the first reading on this ordinance was held
on February 9, 1988, and the second reading was held on
February 23, 1988.
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That Section 21-73 of the Roanoke County Code be
amended and reenacted to read and provide as follows:
Sec. 21-73. General prerequisites to grant.
Exemptions provided for in this division shall be
granted only if the following conditions are met:
(1) That the total combined income, during the imme-
diately preceding calendar year, from all sources,
of the owner of the dwelling and his relatives
living therein did not exceed a}gh~een- theusand
de}}ars- {$}g~A88} twenty-two thousand dollars
($22,000); provided, however, that the first four
thousand dollars ($4,000) of income of each rela-
tive, other than the spouse of the owner, who is
living in the dwelling shall not be included in
such total.
(2) That the owner and his spouse did not have a total
combined net worth, including all equitable inter-
ests, exceeding a}xty-€}tee- theusa~d- della~s
{$65;AA8} seventy-five thousand dollars
($75,000) as of December 31 of the immediately
preceding calendar year. The amount of net worth
specified herein shall not include the value of
the sole dwelling house and up to one acre of
land.
2. That this ordinance shall be effective for the 1988
tax year.
On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor
Nickens, and upon the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
A COPY - TESTE:
m~~-, ,~.
Mary I~. Allen, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
2/24/88
cc: File
Wayne Compton, Commissioner of Revenue
Alfred Anderson, County Treasurer
Reta Busher, Director of Management & Budget
John Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator
Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney
Thomas M. Blaylock, Commonwealth Attorney
Magistrates
Sheriff's Department
Roanoke Law Library
County Code File
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED BOND
FIN~INCING BY ROANOKE VIRGINIA
Notice is hereby given that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia (the "County").will hold~a public hearing in accordance
with Section 15.1-171.1 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended, on the
issuance of general obligation bonds not to exceed $3,985,000 (the "Bonds")
of the County to assist in financing renovations and improvements to Back
Creek Elementary School and Bent Mountain Elementary School. A resolution
authorizing the issuance of the Bonds will be considered by the Board of
Supervisors at its meeting on February 23, 1988. A copy of such resolution
is on file in the office of the County Administrator.
The public hearing, which may be continued or adjourned, will be held
at the evening session beginning at 7:00 p.m., Tuesday, February 23, 1988,
before the Board of Supervisors, in the Community Room of the Roanoke
County Administration Center, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, Roanoke, Virginia.
~~~
Paul M. Mahoney
County Attorney of
Roanoke County, Virginia
Publish on the following dates in the morning and evening editions:
Tuesday, February 9, 1988
Tuesday, February 16, 1988
Send invoice to:
Board of Supervisors
P. 0. Box 29800
Roanoke, VA 24018-0798
PUBLIC NOTICE
Please be advised that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, at its
meeting on February 23, 1988, at the Roanoke County Administration Center,
3738 Brambleton Avenue, Roanoke, Virginia, at the evening session beginning
7:00 p.m. will hold a public hearing on the following matter, to-wit:
ORDINANCE ANIET]DING SECTION 21-73 OF THE ROANOKE CUJrlTY CODE, "E}~N~-
TION FOR ELDERLY AND DISABLID PERSONS," AND REENACTING SAME, TO IN-
CREASE THE TOTAL COMBIl~IED INCCME AND 'I'C7TAL COMBIl~1ED NET WORTH PROVI-
SIONS
All members of the public interested in the matter set forth above may
appear and be heard at the time and place aforesaid.
__ a,~ Y~~ . Y~~
Paul M. Mahoney
County Attorney of
Roanoke County, Virginia
Publish on the following dates in the morning edition:
February 9, 1988
February 16, 1988
Send invoice to:
Board of Supervisors
P. 0. Box 29800
Roanoke, Virginia 24018-0798
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON pROp~Ep BOND
FINANCING BY ROANOKE CYXJI~TI'y VIRGINIA
Notice is hereby given that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia (the "County") will hold a public hearing in accordance
with Section 15.1-171.1 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended, on the
issuance of a Water System Revenue Bond (the "Bond") of the County in a
principal amount not to exceed $975,000 to finance extensions of the
County's existing water system. A resolution authorizing the issuance of
the Bond will be considered by the Board of Supervisors at its meeting on
February 23, 1988. A copy of such resolution is on file in the office of
the County Administrator.
The public hearing, which may be continued or adjourned, will beheld
at the evening session beginning at 7:00 p.m., Tuesday, February 23, 1988,
before the Board of Supervisors, in the Community Room of the Roanoke
County Administration Center, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, Roanoke, Virginia.
Yam ~ ~ ~~~
Paul M. Mahoney
County Attorney of
Roanoke County, Virginia
Publish on the following dates in the morning and evening editions-
Tuesday, 5'ebruary 9, 1988
Tuesday, February 16, 1988
Send invoice to:
Board of Supervisors
P. 0. Box 29800
Roanoke, VA 24018-0798
OOUNI'Y OF ROANOKE
PUBLIC HEARING
NClTICE OF II1I'EI1I' TO ISSUE
REVENUE ANTICIPATION NOTES
Please be advised that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, at its
meeting on February 23, 1988, at the Roanoke County Administration Center,
3738 Brambleton Avenue, Roanoke, Virginia, at the evening session beginning
7:00 p.m. will hold a public hearing on the following matter, to-wit:
AUTHORIZING THE TREASURER TO ISSUE UP 'I'0 $10 MILLION REVE[~IUE ANTICI-
PATION NOTES TO COVER OPERATIONAL CASH DEFICITS WHICH MAY HE EXPER-
IF~ICED DURING THE CCJRRIIVT FISCAL YEAR
All members of the public interested in the matter set forth above may
appear and be heard at the time and place aforesaid.
Paul M. Mahoney
County Attorney of
Roanoke County, Virginia
Publish on the following dates in the morning and evening editions:
Tuesday, February 9, 1988
Tuesday, February 16, 1988
Send invoice to:
Board of Supervisors
P. 0. Box 29800
Roanoke, Virginia 24018-0798