Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1/26/1988 - Regular
Q PpANp~,~ ~~~ 9 ~ ~~ ~~e ~~ C~~~~~ ~a ~.~ a$ SFSQUICEN7EN~~r~ ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS A Bcauti~ulBtRinning ACTION AGENDA JANUARY 26, 1988 Regular Board of Supervisors meeting. at 3:00 Welcome to the Roanoke County and the fourth Tuesday meetings are held on the second Tuesday m on the fourth Tuesday p,m, Public Hearings will be heard at 7:00 p. nth. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. of each mo AFTERNOON SESSION A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.) 1, Roll Call. 2. Invocation: The Reverend Arthur Grant Woodlawn United Methodist Church 3, Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag. B, COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS ECH ANNOUNCED PMM IN RICHMOND E UESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA C• R Q ITEMS. TION OF ITEM G-3, REQUEST FOR DUBVLAICpUBLICNSCHOOLLOAN ECH REQUEST ADDI AppLICATIONS TO TH88VA• RESOURCES AUTHORITY A AUTHORITY ON 2/23/ PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS AND AWARDS D. NONE E. NEW BUSINESS 1. Authorization to acquire Broadview Water System. SAM/RR TO APPROVE URC b lk water 2, Settlement with the City of Roanoke for u purchases for fiscal year ended June 30, 1987. ~ POANpy.~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~~ a z ~~~~~~ ~ 18 ~~ $$ ROANORE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISOR SFSQUICENTENN~P~ A Bcauti~ulBcginning AGENDA JANUARY 26, 1988 Regular Board of Supervisors meeting. at 3x00 Welcome to the Roanoke County 'and the fourth Tuesday meetings are held on the second Tuesday m on the fourth Tuesday p.m, Public Hearings will be heard at 7:00 p• th. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. of .each mon AFTERNOON SESSION A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.~ 1, Roll Call. 2, Invocation: The Reverend Arthur Grant Woodlawn United Methodist Church 3, Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag• B, COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS UESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA C• RE4 ITEMS. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS AND AWARDS D. E• NEW BUSINESS stem . 1, Authorization to acquire Broadview Water Sy Settlement with the City of Roanoke for b1g87water 2. ear ended June 30, purchases for fiscal y Establishment of Automated Refuse System Container 3. policy. F. REQUEST FOR WORK SESSIONS Public Hearing to borrow short-term in G. REQUESTS FOR fUoBLIC HEARINGS 1' Reque ation of taxes. anticip uest for Public Hearing to amend °rand/ore 2• Req tax relief for the elderly concerningersons. disabled p H. AppOINTMENTS eals. Building Code Board of Adjustments and APP 1. Youth and Unit Advisory Council/ 2, Court Service Board Family Services Advisory 3. Grievance Panel 4, Health Department Board of Directors 5, Library Board 6, Social Services Board Commission ~, Transportation and Safety REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS I. J, CONSENT AGENDA TTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDWi LE BE ALL ~- THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE OR FORMS LISTED CONSIDERED BY SSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE UESOLUTION IN THE F WILL BE CONSIDERED BELOW. IF DISC REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND SEPARATELY. 15-foot drainage easement dedicate 1, Acceptance of ment Corporation. by Strauss Develop tance of 22-foot water ment Corporation. 2, Accep Strauss Develop dedicated by easement and foot public utility Dallas G. 3, Acceptance of 12- 12-foot water line ea Jarreildedicated Y Jarrell and Joyce H P. 4. R. S. 188-11 graveyard, located on the east north of its intersection with Catawba Magisterial District. Public Hearing concerning the ordinance amending Chapter 7. of the Roanoke County Code by imposition by Roanoke County Ins ection Fee of $30.00 per FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES roximately five Ordinance authorizing the lease of app 1. acres in the Hollins/Old Mo11nRand fordrecreational (5) County of Roanoke from Ingers purposes. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES Regulations of Chapter 7, Building 1. Ordinance amending Code by the imposition of fees for the Roanoke County ection. cross connection insp CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS ADJOURNMENT side of Route 740 Route 311 in the adoption of an Building Regulations establishing the of a Cross Connection inspection. 5 POANO'YF O~ G ,. ~~ Z Z of a is E50 as SFSQUICENTENN`P~ A Bcarti~ulBeginning COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE C~oixn~~ of a,~vttno~~ January 28, 1988 Rev. Arthur E. Grant Woodlawn Uniteee etSwdist Church 3301 Ashby Str 24015 Roanoke, Virginia BOARD OGARREERCHAIROMAN WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT RICHARD W~ ROBERS. VICE•CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAG~STERI MCGRAW STEV_N A. CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT Dear Reverend Grant: of Supervisors On behalf of the Board ou know of our ortunity to let Y January take attendp ng the meeting on TuesdaY- your the invocation. to ask it is most important We feel to meetings so that all is done according these itizens. I would like to ~apprecia to offer 26, 1988, God's blessing on His will and for the good of all c ou again for sharing your time with us• Thank Y Very truly yours, L e Garrett, Chairman of Supervisors R anoke County Board bjh pp ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 240~8~p798 ~ (703) 772~2p04 p,p. BOX 298 AT A REGULAR COUNTY, VIRGINIA MEETING DATE. SUB~_ A-12688-1 ITEM NUMBER OF THE BOARD OF SUPE~MINISTRATIONN C LATER MEETING THE ROANORE COUNTY HELD AT January 26- 1988 Authorization to Acquire 'S COMMENTS: COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ~~ ~L'>~~ N Broadview Water System p -~ ,~+ INFORMATION: SUMMARY OF The Broadview Thos lsubdivision 11 south of Salstem. The owner of owned water sY it to Roanoke County. in Roanoke County off Route located water by a privately is furnisheds stem has offered to this water Y give System is The Broadview Water water h Ve poor quality ,t in poor condition and is supplied which has resulted in numerous y wells that a uall y Regulation. b of the State Water 4 this water violations to accept and operate water supply In order for Roanoke COtotabandon the wells and 200 feet of line that is within b e it would be necessary interconnection would system, Hill water transmission from the Big The cost of this the subd iv is $4 n000 . s stem to an approximately water distribrcposed that this to upgrade the entire 000. It is p The cost to be $85' this subdivision make a residents in appear status is estimate the It does not of adequate be don e unless toward this cost. end large sums upgrade not ital contribution eXpeCted to exP upgrading significant cap would be stem, instead of that the Cou acquired water sy inadequate. reasonable rade a newly money to uPg owned systems that are also existing County Water System will be FISCAL IMPACT: Broadview cost for cost to acquire the The maintenance to Big e due to the condition an ag The initial Hill. $4,000 for the interconneher than averag s p, realistic cost estimate for maintenanc tem will be hig this sY stem. of the dismadeution sY cannot be ~ -/ RECOMMENDATION: f makes the following recommendations: Staf Water System. f rom the 4,000 appropriation Big Hill accept the Broadview the 1, Roanoke County authorize a $ Water System to The Board of Supervisors Broadview to 2• Fund to connect the Administrator Utility the County as soon as line. authorize this transfer transmissionof Supervisors to effect 3, The Board documents time unless necessary this execute the be made at m ak e a ma j o r possible. this water system not and a lso rade of for an upgrade 4, That uPg etition such an upgrade. the resident toward the cost of contribution AppROVED BY: SUBMITTED BY: 1 '` t~ Elmer C. Hodge p.E. County Administrator------------- ffor aig - Utility Director------------------------------------- VOTNo yes Abs ______----- ACTION roved (x) Motion bY~ App ~ ) W• Robers D en ied Recominen Received ( ) Referred To cc: File John Hubbard Cliff Craig Diane Hyatt McGraw/Richard x Steven A• Robers X to approve staff Garrett x anon Johnson - x McGraw - -'"- x Nickens - ITEr1 ~~- IARO 0~' S pF UpERVIS RATIoN S DM~NIS9ga A .r ~ ROANOKE CENTER L ,~ The County's water rates for the fisnaZeYthe 1988 willn~ea dtupbomadguyeaasto recog the curre beginning July 1, capital items in FISCAL IMPACT: 4 8 3. 6 0, be ests that the unpaid balance of $174, Staff sugg aid to the City of Roanoke from the Fund appropriated and P Fund. Balance of the Water Utility RECOMMENDATION: aid balance be paid to the City of Staff recommends that the Baps, the City advise the County in Roanoke and that in future ital expenditures, so that the County's advance of anticipated cap be adjusted accordingly. rates to its own customers may APPROVED: SUBMITTED BY: ~ ~~~ ohn M. Chamb iss, Jr. Assistant County Administrator ~~~ Elmer C. Hodg County Administrator VOTE -------------------------ACTION No Yes Abs Approved ( ) Motion by: Garrett Denied ( ) Johnson Received ( ) McGraw Referred Nickens To Robers p,-12688-2 ~. ITEM NUMBER__~ NG OF THE BOARD OF SUPERADMINISTRATRO~oENTER AT A REGULAR MEETI OUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNT C January 26, 1988 MEETING DATE: Container Policy Refuse System SUB~T; Automated ,J OR' S COMMENTS : /~p .~~. ~{ .~a/'~'LU-~/ COUNTY ADMINI STRAT / . ~ G c ~~;.~ti~~^I~.vv~"~ ( (~ ~ ~y~' .~"~ ~~~~-J~Z.~7'~1/VN.G( ~ ~ ~ /~- In, t _,~L- ~.//„r~,{,?~~~N~ ~" c-CI R ..~.,C L'W~i~~ SUMMARY OF INFORMATION : ~ ~~n~-'2--~~ Cam" a test of the one-armed bandit, begins itsrequiring residents to use the As the County for replacement rule needs to be established rovides the and explain conditions County issued container damage. This amendment p resulting from theft or required rules. to receive sident must use the County issued container p, , Re service. g, Container is assigned owner; therefore, if moves, the container to the property the owner sells will remain with and not the occupant or the property and/or the property. Additional containers may be purchased will become property of the C. County and will not apply. damaged, under normal p, Containers Containers damaged h County. d at a by residents from the resident and Policy B usage, will be replaced by from abuse or misuse by the cost to the resident. t e replace resident, will be and a police will be replaced by the County F, Stolen containenitiated. investigation to the County authorized structural modifications F, On1Y llowed. container will be a IMPACT: None FISCAL RECOMMENDATION: the County policy be Board approval and for those communities Staff recommeAd~omated System Service amended to define ro ram. effected by the test p g s SUBMITTED BY: ~~`' c-_ ~,.r - 2' v Gar ner W. Smith Director Department of General Services p,PPROVED BY: ~~~~ Elmer C. Hodg County Administrator ---- ----------------- -------- ------ VOTE ------------- ACTION McGraw No Yes Abs Approved (x) Motion by: Steven A. to approve Robers x Denied ( ) Harry C Nickens end olic to delete Garrett x x Received ( ) and am thorit to aint container ohnson w G x Referred au exce t for name and address ra Mc Nickens x to cc: File Gardner Smith John Hubbard ITEM NUMBER MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SpppMZNISTRAT ON CENTER AT A REGULAR 1988 VIRGINIA HELDVAA`r'TON TUESDAY,COp,NUARY 26, COUNTY , IN ROp,NOKE, January 26, 1988 MEETING DATE: ation of taxes UBJECT: Request to borrow short-term in anticip S ~--- MINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~~ G~ COUNTY AD i/~.r`~ ~l ~ ,J' '~'"r ~"4 cs- SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: during will experience shortages periodically Roanoke County d on the due dates of vari°and treal estate taxesp am the year base taxes are due May 3 sharp declines i personal property eriencng due June 5. Localities are exp ro ections, but tes on short term investme revenue hpal jo affect cand interest ra flow. The problem does not lie wit which does not correspo rather the timing of tax collection, with our cash needs. roceeds rohibit the use of bond a ult of New federal tax laws now P ation of 'n a manner which could generate inter~o borrowenn anticip i it will be necessary these changes, taxes to relieve the current situation. the Treasurer to tin a resolution authorizing ervisors must Before adop g rocess, the Board of SuP The following proceed with the loan P on the matter. legal steps first hold a public hearing ested whicisoiallow othehCounty to take receipt of schedule is sugg to be accomplished and a basis. the monies on a timely of a public hearing 1988 - Authorize the scheduling anticipation of tax January 26, 1988 to consider borrowing eratinq funds. on February 23- ro ected cash deficits in the op revenues to cover p J and adopt the 1988 - Hold the public hearing February 2 3 ~ the Treasurer to borrow the cash . resolution authorizing of money to the 1988 - Receive bids for ofethe Boa d of Supervisors. March 8, County; award the bid at the meeting ossession of ch 14, 1988 - Close on the transaction and take p Mar the monies. _~ `-~ - FISCAL IMPACT: $iUU,000 has been includedrrowi ge 1987-88 budget to cover the net interest cost for this bo RECOMMENDATION: ublic The Board of Supervisol988smeeting to considerdauthorizing hearing for the February 23, the Treasurer to borrow said monies. SUBMITTED BY: ~~~ / / Alfred C. Anderson County Treasurer APPROVED: -v~.ui ~~~ Elmer C. Hodg County Administrator ------------------ VOTE ---------------------- ACTION --------- No Yes Abs Approved ( ) Motion by: Garrett Denied ( ) Johnson Received ( ) McGraw Referred Nickens To Robers ITEM NUMBER ~-' ~' AT A REGULAR MEETING THE ROANOKE COUNTYSADM NISTRATION CENTER COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT JANUARY 26, 1988 IN ROANOKE VA, ON TUESDAY, MEETING DATE: January 26, 1988 SUBJECT: Consideration ncernei dinTaxe Relief for theeElde rly County Code co g and/or Disabled Persons. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: it At the January 12 meeting of the Board of Supervisors, was suggested that the current County code section related to the tax relief credits for e~dne~ worth provisionsecould be amendeda to see if the income and/o It has been suggested 88ataxomear,r abovesandlbeyondothe current these persons for the 19 Y income and net worth limits. It is suggested thathe Februaryt9rmeeting of theeBoarddof ordinance be considered at Supervisors and that a public hearing 23 1988dmeeting, based ordinance be considered at the February the Board of upon changes which could be recommended by Supervisors to County staff. Attached is a copy of the current ordinance, the original application form, and a draft Board of Supervisors report which could be considered at a later date. After we have rocriate input from the Board members, staff will prepare an app P ordinance amendment. FISCAL IMPACT To be estimated after the income and net worth changes are suggested to County staff. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the amendments to the County c°ublic considered at heduledrforyFebruary 23n,eto1 mplementtsa d changes. hearing be sc SUBMITTED BY: ~~ ,~L-.' Sohn M. Chamb ss, Jr• Assistant County Administrator APPROVED: Elmer Hodge County Administrator ------------ --------------------- VOTE --------------- ACTION No Yes Abs Approved ( ) Motion by: Garrett Denied ( ) Johnson Received ( ) McGraw Referred Nickens To Robers JMC/cw Attachments --__- j 4 ~' ~_- 1 ITEM NUMBER MEETING OF THE BOARD OF Sp,DPMINIS RAT ON R ENDER AT A REGULAR 1988 COUNTY, VIRGINIA HE~REAVA,HONRTUESDAYCOJp~UARY 26, IN ROAN MEETING DATE: January 26, 1988 ration of Amending Sectill f -for thrElde ~lY SUBJECT CountyeCode concerning Tax Re and/or Disabled Persons. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: rovid es for tax Code p ears of age or older Section 21-73 of the Roanoersons 65 Y rovided they meet relief on real estate taxermane n ly disabled, pThe County Code or who are totally or p certain income and net worth requirements. fires that the combined in c0°andithaththe combined presently requ ear, not exceed $18,00 but excluding the preceding calendar Y all equitable interests, land) net worth (including house and up to one acre of value of the sol x de sl ofn$65,000. Section o8'thesel lim t tions shall not be in e has placed a ceiling of Virginia as amended, 000 for combined ui ments of $22,000 for combined fine°messiae$ and are not the req Thes~hetlocaletaxnordinanpes. for the applicant must file ear, in For the 1988 real estate tax Y not later thaforathe 1988t tax their application or affadovriate tax credit order to receive the apP p year. 274.00 tax credit was 269' ualify under During calendar Year to Bits citizens who q allowed by Roanoke County has no records as to the income e these programs. Since the County ombined net worth of its Sesidents who also meet b it would be difficult to levels and c reQuirement , ualify Y age and/or disability ersons who WOnoa Would it be estimate the number of additiona p net worth levels,act of the tax increasing the income and/or ending fiscal imp practicWhich would be lost,lmp dollars uire the he changing of these dolly o dinance ~ which q ould be T the CouhtY Code by after due public amendment of 23~ 1988 meeting accomplished at the February gince this time st ff s of the ordinance) . c cle, hearings (two reading d be approaching the end of the normal filing w ou 1 t be considered as a part of the budgef suggests that the concep fiscal year and that the changestaff ear. program for the upcoming n lemented for the 1989 real estate tax the tax be imP of computing the credit be a y~ ests that the methodology also Bugg sliding scale instead of freezing reviewed to considevel at the qualify g FISCAL IMPACT The net fiscal impact of Supervisors establishes worth an enueastoffice,study of the Rev RECOMMENDATION: cannot be determined the new lllished by is accomp until the Board income and net the Commissioner mmends that the Board of Supervisors take this Staff reco the normal ter under advisement for changesrbecome effective with the mat budget process and that any 1989 real estate tax year. SUBMITTED BY: h, ~~- Jr . John M. Chamb iss, Assistant County Administrator Elmer Hodge County Administrator ------------------------------ VOTE --------------------- ACTION No Yes A'os Approved ( ) Motion by: Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred To cc: Wayne Compton, Commissioner of Revenue paul Mahoney, County Attorney Hodge, County Administrator Elmer C. Diane Hyatt, Director of Finance ppPROVED Garrett Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers § 21-73 TAXATION the correction of erroneous assessments, and for such purposes, the boards of equalization and roll-back taxes shall be considered~j be deferred real estate taxes. (Ord. No. 84-191, § 19-g(q),11-13 nia, § 58.13243 State law reference-Similar provisions, Code of Virgi Secs. 21-62-21-70. Reser~'ed. ON 3. EXEMPTION FOR ELDERLY AND DISABLED PERSONS* DIVISI Sec. 21-71. Administration of division. shall royal of the board of supervisors, (a) The commissioner of the rave consistent witht he provisions of this division, as are develop such rules and regulations, determined necessary for the proper administration of this division. ersonnel administering the pro~'aTn (b) This division shall be construed to allow county P b section 58.1-3210 of the Code of provided for herein all authority granted to the county Y Virginia. (Code 1970, § 19-8(c); Ord. No. 2736,12-9-80) Sec. 21-72. Authorized. i upon application made and within the limits tion of the tax on real property occupied as the sole '` The commissioner of the revenue shall, five grant an exemp provided in this division, title or partial title thereto who is not less th owned by a dwelling house of a person holding unit jointly and permanently disabled. A dwelling ears of age or is (65) yam's of age or totally ouse is over sixty-five (65) y husband and wife may qualify, if either sp permanently and totally disabled. (Code 1970, § 19-8(a); Ord. No. 2235,1-23-79; Ord. No. 2736, 12-9-80) rerequisites to grant• conditions Sec. 21-73. General p anted only if the following Exemptions provided for in this division shall be gr are met: receding calendar year, during the immediately P therein did not (1) That the total combined income, and his relatives living from all'sources, of the owner of the dwelling rovided, however, that the first four exceed fifteen thousand dollars ($15,000.00); p ouse of the thousand dollars ($4,000.00) of income of not be included n such total.sp in the dwelling shall owner, who is living er and his spouse did not have a total combine 5 000 00) as of Dec tuber (2) That the own f~y_five thousand dollars ($5 , equitable interests, exceeding ~- ference-Authority of county to adopt ordinance from which this division *State law re ( ~ is derived, Code of Virginia, § 58.1-3210. 1169 ROANOKE COUNTY CODE § 21-73 ecified calendar year The amount of net wto o e acre of 31 of the immediately preceding house and up herein shall not include the value of the sole dwelling land. 1.23-79; Ord. No. 2736,12-9-80) (Code 1970, § 19-8(a); Ord. No. 2235, lication and certificate u d r thilist division shall file an application far Sec. 21-74. APP tion 1 and (a) A person seeking an exemp avit form, with the commissioner of the revenulicationeshall set h the exemption, in affid tion is claimed. Such app ear for which exemp for which the exemption is claimed and March 31 of the Y ersons occupying the property names of any related p e uitable interests, and the combined income including q rescribed that the total combined net worth, f the persons specified in section 21-73 does not exceed the limps p from all sources o five (65) e of sixty- in such section. ursuant to an exemption because he has attained davit t ereof p (}~) A person claiming lication and make aff ears and in years shall be required to file an initial app ~ eriod of three (3) Y to make lication will be valid for a p aired only subsection (a) above. This initial app ~ anted, such person shall be req that the lied by the commissioner of the revenue, intervening years, once the exemption is gr din affidavit filed has not changed so as to violate the limita- an annual certification, ° rece msg o be supp information on the la ropided in this division. five (65) years tions and conditions p 1 in for an exemption under this division is under six y- (c) R a person app Y g the application referred to in sub he social e he shall be required to submit annually, of ag , lication shall have attached to it a certification by above and each such annual ape Brans administration, the railroad retirement board or the security administration, the licant has been determined to be abled such that he is unable to engage in any substantially civil service commission whs h shall indicate that t e aPP ..:mental impairment which permanently and totally d determinable physical or ble for gainful activities by reason of a medically erson's life. If such person is not eligi a sworn affidavit, by t"`1O (2) can be expected to last for the duration of such P encies, such certification by any of the above mentioned ag ractice medicine in the commonwealth, to the effect that sac table, so long as the affidavit of at least medical doctors licensed top disabled is accep such doctor. person is so totally and permanently erson by on a physical examination of such 2 9 80) one such doctor is bas OrdpNo. 2235, 1-23-79; Ord. No. 2736, (Code 1970, § 19-8(a); }~ commissioner of revenue; confidentiality of information re- Sec. 21-75. ~quiries y ceived under division. ui of persons seeking an necessary to determine their qualifica- (a) The commissioner of the reve be reasonably a such inq exemption under this division as may tions therefor. All such inquiries shall be answered under oath. ceived by the commissioner of the reven ident al and hall be used (b) All information re a plication for an exemption under this division is deemed to be co P county personnel only in the official add inO daNo. 2736112 9 80)n by Ord. No. 2235, 1-23 (Code 1970, § 19-8(a); 1170 ~ _,_,.. ~.. _. TAXATION § 21-79 Sec. 21-76. Mobile homes as real estate for purposes of division. For the purposes of this division, a mobile home shall be de the followi ngal estate, if the owner's intention is that it be permanently affixed, as shown by (1) The owner of the mobile home, or his spouse, parent omehs situated andlthermob le whole or in part, in the land upon which the mobile ho home is connected to permanent water and sewer lines or other facilities, such as a well and septic system; or (2) Regardless of the ownership of thnsists of two h2 horh more lmobileeun'ts ~ which care a permanent foundation and co connected in such a manner that ere onnect dr oomseortaddit ons which must be consists of a mobile unit and oth removed before the mobile unit can be towed on a highway. (Ord. No. 2736, 12-9-80) Sec. 21-77. Amount of exemption. The amount of the exemption provided for in this division is that portion of the tax which represents an increase in tax liability since the authorizi gthe exemption became effective) years or became disabled or the year ordinances whichever is later. The tax exemption for the elderly became effective, for those who reached age sixty-five (65) on or before December 31, 1974, in 1974. The tax exemption for those who I became totally and permanently disabled on or before December 31,1977, became effective for the 1977 tax year (Code 1970, § 19-8(b); Ord. No. 2736, 12-9-80) Sec. 21-78. Land book entry. The commissioner of the revenue shall indicate on the land books of the county the amount of tax exemption granted pursuant to the provisions of this division. (Code 1970, § 19-8(c); Ord. No. 2736, 12-9-80) Sec. 21-79. Nullification or proration upon change in status. Changes in respect to income, financial worth, ownership of property or other factors occurring during the taxable year for which an affidavit or certification is filed pursuant to section 21-74, and having the effect of exceeding or violating the limitations and conditions provided in this division, shall nullify any exemption for the then current taxable year and the taxable year immediately following; provided, however, that a change in ownership to a spouse who is less than sixty-five (65) years of age or who is not permanently and totally disabled, which results solely from the death of his or her qualified spouse, shall result in a prorated exemption for the then current taxable year. Such prorated portion shall be deter- mined by multiplying the amount of the exemption by a fraction wherein the number of complete months of the year such property was properly eligible for such exemption is the numerator and the number twelve (12) is the denominator. (Ord. No. 2736, 12-9-80) 1171 § 21-80 ROANOKE COUNTY CODE ~~ Sec. 21-80. False claims. hcation under this Any false statement made in connection with the filing of an app division shall constitute a Class 4 misdemeanor. (Code 1970, § 19-8(a); Ord. No. 2235,1-23-79; Ord. No. 2736, 12-9-80) Cross reference-Penalty for Class 4 misdemeanor, § 1-10. Secs. 21-81-21-95. Reserved. ARTICLE IV. RETAIL SALES TAX Sec. 21-96. Levied; to be added to rate of state sales tax; etc. pursuant to section 58.1-605 of the Code of Virginia, undal general retail sales tax, at t e of the county, is hereby levied. rate of one percent, to provide revenue for the general f osed by chapter 6 of title 58.1(§ Such tax shall be added to the rate of the state sales tax 1 ect to all of the provisions of such 58.1-600 et seq.) of the Codnts thereofland the rules and regulations published with respect chapter, all the amendme thereto. (Code 1970, § 19-3) - tion. Sec. 21-97. Exemption for sale of fuel for domestic consump tion from the tax levied by pursuant to section 58.1-609 of the Code of Virginia, an exemp anted for sales of artificial or propane gas, firewood, coal or home section 21-96 is hereby gr tion" is hereby heating oil used for domestic consumption. The term "domestic consump oil by an ro ane gas, firewood, coal or home heating defined to mean the use of artificial or p p oses. individual purchaser for other than business, commercial or industrial pure (Ord. No. 3029,12-9-81) Sec. 21-98. Administration and collection. - the local general retail sales tax pursuant to section 58.1-605 of the Code of Virginia, 'ed b this article shall be administered and collected b ed for the fate sa es taxnwith the levi Y same manner and subjecsection 58 1628 of the Code of Virginia. adjustments required by (Code 1970, § 19-3) Secs. 21-99-21-110. Reserved. ARTICLE V. BANK FRANCHISE TAX Sec. 21-111. Definitions. ose of this article, the following words and phrases shall have the following For the purp `t - meanings: 1172 ~p AN,y. REAL ESTATE TAX ASSISTANCE FOR ROABOE ECIOTIZENS~OWN OF VINTO . R D1SA a ~a ~~ ae SESOUICENTEMN~'~ A Bcawi~ul8cginning _ SENIOR AND10 R. WAYNE COMPTON, COMMISSIONER OF THE REVENUE P.O. Box 20409 ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018.0513 TELEPHONE: 772.2046 ~. OFFICE LOCATED: 3738 BRAMBLETON AVENUE ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018 IMPORTANT FOR IMFORMATION PERTAINING TO I ANY QUESTIONS IN TH1S FORM CALL: TAX ASSISTANT CLERK 772.2046 I All information on this affidavit and the Financial Statement is confidential and not open for public inspection. INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING THIS FORM PLEASE READ CAREFULLY 1. All questions on this application must be completed to the best of your knowledge and ability. To be eligible for the tax assistance program you must complete and return this application to the 2. Commissioner of the Revenue's office between January 1 and March 31, and NO APPLICATIO CAN BE ACCEPTED AFTER MARCH 31ST. 3. This application must be signed before a Notar aPthree Notaries and~herefis no chargeefo~this the Commissioner of the Revenue. Our office h service. 4. You are required each year to complete a new application, although your status may not have changed. 5. See SECTION B of this application for more provisions. if you have any questions concerning this application, please feel free to call 772.2046. Location and legal description of property-form tax ticket or deed: Street on s falsely claiming an exemption shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and may be fined up to $1,000. Any pers ( ) ... ~} ITEM NUMBER ~ ~ -- LAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OFUNTYEADMINISTRATION CENTER AT A REGU 1988 COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT TON TIIESDAY,CJANUARY 26, IN ROp.NOKE, VA. - MEETING DATE: January 26, 1988 23 Meeting Request for Public Hearings at the Februar SUBJECT• to the Virginia Resources ---- for Loan Applications Authority and the Virginia Public School Authority COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: lications, which have been submittedn°a The preliminary app have been approved by the Virg the 5 495,000 and by behalf of Roanoke COforyproJects totalling rojects totalling Resources Authority for p finalized a Virginia Public School Authority 3 985, U00 . Before eitheandfatformaloresolution a ke Countyg $ ' must be held public hearing the Board of Supervisors of Roano encies, the loan adopted by 1988 n order to comply with thmust be held at yours Februa y 23, I ublic hearings these two p meeting. FISCAL IMPACT: rvice for the repayment of these two loans has been Debt se coming budget projections. included in the up RECOMMENDATION: recommends that the Board of Supervisors authorize The staff 23, 1988, concerning (1) a public hearing to be held on Februarthe Virginia Resources 495,000 bonds by ublic hearing the issuance of S5- concerning the Authority (plus issuance expenses) and988)meeting p h the for the February 23, throug be scheduled 000 school improvement bonds issuance of $3,985, Virginia Public School Authority. APPROVED: SUBMITTED BY: ~i ~~T~~ hamb ss, Jr ,john M. C Assistant Administrator Elmer C. Ho ge County Administrator _______ ----------------------------- VOTE ------- ACTION No Yes Abs Approved ( ) Motion by: Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred T o ~- Garrett Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers ~~~ ITEM NUMBER ING OF THE BOARD OF SUYEADMINISTRATIONNCENTER AT A REGULAR MEET COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNT January 26, 1988 MEETING DATE: Boards ointments to Committees, Commissions and SUB~T: App COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: eals Buildin Code Board of Ad'ustments and A ollins Magisterial 1. term of Norman Eugene Jarr1988•H Four -Year His term expired January 22 District. youth and Famil Services Council/ 2, CourtBoa~aice Unit Advisor Advisory Northside High School. outh member Eanily Reaser, One-Year term of Y 1987. Her term expired November 13, 3, Grievance Panel: Robers. Mr. Robers has the Board of Supervisors. His fired two-year term of Richard UnexP resigned due to his election o tember 27, 1989. term expires Sep of Directors: 4, Health De artment Board .s term expired November ear term of Parker Foley. Mr. Foley Two-Y 26, 1987. 5 Library Board: isterial District. Winstead, Catawba Mag McGraw is 1987. Supervisor Four-year term of Paula er term expired DeceSbMr Miller, and confirmation of his H Mr , Jame nominating enda. appointment is under the Consent Ag isterial District. Eddy, Windsor Hills Mag ~ nominee Four-year term of Nancy 1987. Supervisor Garrett sointment Her term expired December 31 to ill health, and this app has dot be fillederve due must 6, Social Services Board Mr. groderick's term William P. Broderick. Four-year term if 1988. expired January ~~_ ~, Trans ortation and Safet Commission: Johnson who represent ay represents Three-year terms of Leo Trenor and Mrs. 1~ 1988. izens at large, and CharTheir termstexPired January clt anizations. Neighborhood Org p,ppROVED BY SUBMITTED BY : '1 ~~ y'~2 ~ Elmer C . Hodge Mary H. Allen County Administrator - Deputy Clerk ------------------------------- ------------------ VOTE ------------------------ACTION No Yes Abs Approved ( ) Motion by: Garrett Denied ( > Johnson McGraw Received ( ) Nickens Referred Robers T o ~- r~ - ~ COURT SERVICES FAMILY TT ADVISORY COUNC SER~- ADVISOKz BOARD TH AND p,, COMPOSITION isterial mag h school. Governing Board to consou~ri member fromreach higac district, and one Y and city served by a court service unit may council. bodies of each county appoint one or more members to a citizen advisory B . DUT_I_ES :: Advises and cooperates with the court upon all matters •n the working of this law anandttordomesticlrelations; affects g rotection children, their care and p Consults and confer with the court and director of e development and extension of court service unit relative to the b the council to serve on the court service program; Encourage the members selected Y ntral advisory council to visassociationsareceivingber the ce institutions and conveniently can, ort to the court the conditions or in charge of any children under shof the chdildrenereceived by and surrounding such persons, institutions or associations. uncil should make themselves thelcourtwand the work The Co ort to of the court. Makes an annual rep anticipating governing bodies on the work of the councl - p Board: As the Youth and Famil Services Advisor _wide youth oafs and priorities for Countfor comprehensive Establish g fanning services; assist in coordination an P rivate sector. Serve in an advisory ervisors to youth services within the p ~~minimum capacity and to otherwise assist the Blaancefwith all ment Act establish goals and objectives in comp dards of the Delinquency Prevention and Youth Develop Stan an assessment of the needs of of 1979". Assist in conducting in an annual youth every five years and to assist in darticppage in evaluating Delinquency Prevention Plan, further to P a report thereon to the the implementation of the plan and making ervisors. Provide a public forum where concerns Board of Supma be expressed and to receive recommendationreqular about youth Y rivate organizations at any ublic and p Advocates necessary raise concerns of p ro er notice. outh advisory board meeting upon prove community conditions for Y legislative amendments o° tithe development of needed services development and tOivape for youth in the community. both public and p C, MEETING SCHEDULE: time the third Tuesday, beginning January; One a quarter, and place determined at meetings. --> - i ~--1- ~ GRIEVANCE PANEL p,, COMPOSITION consist of three (3) members, appointed by the Board of To Supervisors; for terms of two years. B . DUB S t such rules and procedures as it deems The panel shall adop anel has the responsibility to necessary and desirable. The Plication, and meaning of the retation, aPP ulations. The panel rule on the interp rules. and reg set a time for County's personnel policies, a anel chairman, shall selectwhoCheshallebelheld as soon as practical, but no days after the grievant the hearing later than fifteen (15) full working appeal. C. MEETING SCHEDULE with the Administrator shall arrange a hearing The County rievance. panel members to hear the g f7 "-~ HEALTH DEPARTMENT BOARD OF DIRECTORS Director, AlleghanY Health the Nancy M. Welch, will appoint one Established by 1985. Roanoke County District on OctobtWO3year term. individual for a Meetings will be held four times per year. TERM TERM EXPIRES 2 years ''~~,~ ~ . Parker Foley 3767 Kentland Dr. Roanoke, Virginia 24018 Home: 989-1194 Work: 989-9500 ~-~- y LIBRARY- B_O_ P'RD COMPOSITION (Code of Virginia 42.1-35) A, a ointed by To consist of not lee than five (5) members, P resenting each Magisterial District, the Board of Supervisors, P onl two terms consecutivel . members may serve 4 year terms, B , DUT~_ free public library For management and control of a s credited to ht to accept donations s stem. Has control of the eXpeHastthe oigall mone y Tonal free library fund. or real estate for the the reg ersonal property Tonal free library and bequests of money, P to execute establishment and maintenance °fHascauthority system or endowments for same. ur ose of administering a public library contracts for the P ion. service with the reg C. MEETING SCHEDULE: m., Headquarters Fourth Wednesday of each month, 5:30 p- Library Route 419. ~ ~ ~~ i SOCIAL SERVICES BOARD (WELFARE) 1_58 OMPOSITION: (Section 63.1-36 through Section 63. A. C of the Code of Virginia) ointed by the Board of To consist of three (3) members, aears, except that an Supervisors to serve terms of four (4 Y fired term shall serverifhoverm theda9e appointment to fill an unexp ible to of that term; that no member is elig gyp); that no member shall servoi tmentttonfill an) seventy ( not counting an app consecutavvacancy. One member shall also be a member of the unexplre ervisors. Board of Sup B. DUT_ IES: Board is authorized to recelources ansthesform of The rant or private s ur ose of derived from public g contributions bequests or legacies for the p gifts, ersons within their respective counties. aiding needy p The Board shall submit annually to the Board of overning bodies of their Supervisors, councils and other g an estimate and budget containing needed to carry respective counties, a forth the amount of tonthe Commissioner. supporting data setting out the provisions of this title and a copy d to employ legal counsel inncivofl tstmembers orve Authorize a court advise to or represent the local boardaotment and to p Y the employees of the local welfare dep d other incidental expenses involved in the conduct o costs an rovide either directly or such civil maurchaseAofhservices~ any or all child welfare through the p services. which Authorized to provide adult foster home services, ude recruitment, approval abd theeStaterBoardaofoWelfare. may incl ulations adopted y with rules and reg C. MEETING SCHEDULE: and Monday of each month, Agency Office at 2:30 P.M. Sec ~~~ 26 TRANSPORTATIONOKEDCOUNTYY COMMISSION ROA A, COMPOSITION: _ 398, Code of Virginia) (Resolution 84-37 (Section 33.1 1984) approved February 14, To consist of eleven (11) msobsrs Termse shalll bel four appointed by the Board of Supervi ut no members shall serve fontsoto beastaggered ful years, b ointme successive terms. Initial app B. DUT_ ZES:: and responsibility to: The Comn-ission shall hrovetalldhighway safety grants and examine, and aPP ervisors; (b) promote all (a) review, recommend same to the Board of Sup ro rams; (c) make highway and transportation safety P g ervisors to VDH&T h the Board of Sup ineering improvement; recommendations throng rovements, and eng ervisors a regarding signs, road imp h the Board of Sup and (d) develop and establish throng and sponsor an annual awards safety program for the County in the application of safety banquet for persons excelling measures and procedures. C. MEETING SCHEDULE: Minimum of 4 meetings per year. r` EGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OKESCOUNTYSADMINISTRATOION AT A R HELD AT THE ROAN 1988 COUNTY, VIRGINIA, TUESDAY, JANUARY 26, CENTER ON RESOLUTION IN.CERT ITEMSOSETGFORTH CONCURRING ON THE BORATE DESIGNATEDOAS ITEMDJ - FOR THIS CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1• That that certain section of the agenda of the - f Su ervisors for January 26, 1988, designated as Item J Board o P enda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to Consent Ag item separately set forth in said section designated Items each through 8, inclusive, as follows: Acceptance of 15-foot drainage easement dedicated 1• ment Corporation. by Strauss Develop 2. Acceptance of trausstDevelopment Corporation. dedicated by S ublic utility easement and 3• Acceptance of 12-foot p Dallas G. 12-foot water 1CeeHeaJaYreildedicated by Jarrell and Joy 4. Acceptance of lmeroJt Craft,lJre andeNancy P• dedicated by E1 Craft. Request from Roanoke Valley Alcohol Safety Action 5. Board for ratification and Program (VASAP) Policy ointments. confirmation of Board apP Confirmation'of Committee Appointment to the 6. Library Board. ~. Acquisition of sewer easement. Authorization to enter into agreement with 8. to maintain Clearbrook Appalachian Power Company Park electrical service. 2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized wired by law to set forth upon any of said and directed where req such item pursuant to items the separate vote tabulation for any this resolution. Items 1 - 5, 7 and $, were approved on motion of visor Bob L. Johnson, seconded by Supervisor Harry C• Super Nickens, and upon the following recorded vote: ervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett AYES : Sup NAYS: None Item 6 was approved on motion of Supervisor Harry C. seconded by Supervisor Bob L. Johnson, and upon the Nickens, following recorded vote: Garrett AYES- Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, NAYS: None A COPY - TESTE: ~° H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Mary Board of Supervisors Roanoke County 1/28/88 cc: File County Attorney Paul Mahoney, Administrator John Hubbard, Assistant Couineering Phil Henry, Director of Eng Cliff Craig, Director of Utilities POANO'rF z°~ ~ 9 ~ ~~a~.~e ~t ,~~~ ~~~~~~ ~ ~e ' ~~ as SFSQUICEN7ENN`~~ A BcaurifulBcginning M E M O R A N D U M Mary Allen TO : ~ . aiy~lr~~ Steven A. McGraw FROM: January 15, 1988 DATE: ou to place the name of Mr. Mary, I would like for y Salem, who lives at 3623hone number Ds1389~ 6768- on James M. Miller, inia 24153, and whose home teleoPnted representative to the Virg enda as the Catawba aPP If you need any additional the consent ag h 1991. and to Library Board for 1988 throug mation, please do not hesitate to contact me in re infor this matter. SAM/bjh The Stone Co. P. O. Box 19097 C Roanoke, VA 24019 703-563-8757 De cember 23 , 19$7 Mr. Elmer Hodge 373$ Brambleton Ave. S. W. Roanoke, Virginia 2015 Dear Mr. Hodge, leasant meeting we had On behalf of the Stone Company, many thanks for the P for~,rard to our with you and your staff on December $• roductsein moregdetail. meeting on January 26 to cli-scuss our p >.,~ ~.-_ n r ' Sincerely, ` ;' ,~ The Stone Company ~ '~~ Todd Stone HGS~jas ~r yz'~` .~„ ~~~~ -L~~ Norweco Packaged Sewage Treatment Plants A-12688-3 . a~' '.( ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BNOKE OCOUNTYEADMINISTRATIONNOCENTER COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE RVA. ON TUESDAY, IN ROANOKE, MEETING DATE: January 26, 1988 JECT: Acceptance of a 15-foot d~'ainage easement being dedi- SU=_ Strauss Development Gated to the County of Roanoke by Corporation COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: „~~`" A<< ~'~ ~~ ~~ SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: to the County Strauss Developmeasementofor lthe llo a d onat con struction, and of Roanoke a 15-foot ar Ma le Court and maintenance of a drainage easem the Falls n gthe Catawba Magis- Lots 4-7, Block 2, Section 4, uired in aerial. District of Roanoke County. This action is req order to dedicate the easement for public use. 27 Pursuant to Ordinance 1987, the Board authorized donations or dedications of FISCAL IMPACT: None. No. 102787-4 adopted on October , theon ° oversAallrealrestate matterst nonc RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the B onsentaagenday consider this acceptance by resolution under the Respectfully submitted, ~~ ' ~, Paul.. M. Mahoney County Attorney ----------- ----------------- ------- VOTE --- ACTION Approved (x) Motion by: Bob L Johnson/Harry Garrett Denied ( ) C. Nickens Johnson Received ( ) McGraw Referred Nickens To _ Robers cc: File Paul Mahoney Phil Henry Cliff Craig No Yes Abs X x x x r r,1 ~ B~ u °~ '` '~ h ~~1 oa F Q z O ~ ~ ~ U ~~F~ U ~~ \~0 P P z `~ a ~ ~ ~ A p r w ~; z O o '" ~ ~ Y ~-+ ao4 W d Q ~O (n O O~+ Q H ~ Ucn W Z ~ O ~U E., wwz U O W a o~- Ucno ,n~c7 ~ ~ ! ~ O ~ ~ (n F- H r r+ W W W x~ g c9 h ~ a w ~ ~ W ~]N ~ w o O Z ~ 0.: O iSU U ~ Y p ~UP.UIi- J J L7 >' aU E. ~ U7. a Z a m w ~,~ ~ ~ ~ O 'H a 7 z 7 z a W ~ w c~ '~ ~ o Jz~ ~ w w~ ~~ q i `~. ~ ~ W Q ~ W U ~ ~ ~ W Cl W r- u ~ ~ Q aw ~ a~wQO ~ ° - t W Q "' ~ .~ E~ 7. o ~ = ~ O U x .. m .7 W w = ~ a J v ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ U : , m ~ I r, I cn , ~ ~ J ~ 1 , 1 ~ F ~ t~ I O ~ ~ N `~ 11 ~ = ~ ti W ~i a- ~- ~ 1 1I4L ~ ' Gb 9 e~ M n~ „ pQ Ofai - _ ~ ~`~~- r• - a ~ __ 3G-5~ ~ - - ~ ~ ~ 9ix3 r r ~ 5~~ ° I I~ ~ 2 o ~ - 00 ~! -~ _ z _ , 12 5 I _ ~ ~ `' I I ~. 0 M., 00,51 , o I ~ 0 `r o~~~~ o ~~ I I Q ~ ~ Q Z ^ ` 1 ~~o / \ V7 ~ 1 ~ OK QQ` S~ wNm ~DN ~o Q ] o ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ I ~~1 ~ u ~~ ~`~ R '~ -a~[u-~-t'~JI a Q ~~ it n n a w Z ~, ~ -~ ~ ~ a N ~ Q ~ „~- ! \ b o v bD0// / ~ g ~ ~ r..A~O~y,LDy 1 ~ ~ m ~ ,,- ~ o ~ N ~ '~,ODOy 1 Q w~~nN~. MN`7' ~ ' .L ~ N ~ ern,-~rnr ~~~rn H ~ ° r~~ ~ 1 f c p M ~ Z . _~ ~ i 1!,DO.O~,Lpy-_ N z N W ww333 W 3 1 1 ~ a '~ Q _ _ - c n j ~ L ; Z ~ W 7 ~rnooow°M'` ro l ~ ~ ® Q~ O N O r ~ ~ ~ " ~D O 6~ M Z O I ~ ~ r~ ® Q W o 0 0 ~ ° ° N Z ~ ~;~~"-~ s ~ ~~~ ~ _ - --~1_ I ~~ ~ ~ .mo mo ~z~~2~~~ _ - - o ~ ~d ,~~ ~ `~ w Nri~~~,.~raor+ ~Ij ~~ \\ ~~ \ Q z rl N M °S' ~Il lG r ~ W L ~~ ~'j6b s \ o ~ A-12688-3.b ITEM NUMBER _ A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOAKD OCOUNTYEADMINISTRATIONNOCENTER AT COUNTY, VIRGINIA HINDROANOKE,ROA ~ ON TUESDAY, MEETING DATE: January 26, 1988 Acce tance of a 22-foot waterke ~ estrauss Development SUBJECT: P cated to the County of Roano Y Corporation COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: `~~~~ ~~~- ~ ~ SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: to the County Strauss Development Corporation is dedicat construction, and of Roanoke a 22-f° atera linen ac ~oss Lots cl t8 ~ BlOivel' Sections 5 , maintenance of a w ortion of Scarlet Oak Dr , the Falls and across a P isterial District of Roanoke County. the Falls in the Catawba Mag is action is required in order to dedicate the easement or Th public use. rsuant to Ordinance No. 102787-4 adopted on October 27, Pu 7 the Board authorized the n °r oversAallrealrestate matters. 198 , donations or dedications of nonco FISCAL IMPACT: None. RECOMMENDATION: Y consider this It is recommendedon tU dertthe B onsentaagenda. acceptance by resolu Respectfully submitted, `'~M Pau]_ M. Mahoney County Attorney ~" __ ---------------------------------- VOTE ------- ACTION No Yes Abs Bob L. Approved ( X) Motion by : ____-__- C. Nickens Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred To __-- cc: File Paul Mahoney Phil Henry Cliff Craig Johnson/Harry x Garrett Johnson x McGraw x Nickens x Robers x ~.. ~` ~~ F~V ~~oL~~~ Q~ 0 W O OC d a Q w c ~n F ~ ~ Z ~ a o f.{ ~ O z pr-q P+H Z H~ Q Fix - ~ U ~soaa r O w • o ~ E'"-' E, w d cn ~ cn ~ 50 O Y H O -awwQ p~ ~ F- H O ~ ~ozw ~ w w Q ¢ w a t- x --~ a" H w ~ 3 w w F o ~ cn ~ w o •mcna ~ xo o ~ z w o c~ r e a m a w q c W ~ O G. H ~ O ~ + . a a ~ ~ c v ~ J c n ~ P N w } z VHwc w a~ F Z C7 F- ~ ~ ao ~ 3 Hz a z J w o o aoH U Wa ~ v ~aH a ~ F'G`' a n3x `~ ~ ~ ~p , w O=FC O ~ r m .~ u w Q d' w H Q U a .- a xa Fz ~ ZF ZlS~L 0, r` a OOUO ~ ~ x z H a F ~ :J L ~- ~ ~ . ' m 1 , r 1 ~' a ~o ~ 1~1 ALL- _~ __ ~11~_ '~ ~ r ~ ~ t Q ~ ~ 1 N Y r- ~ '- , 31 O i r ! ~ 2 x r 1 K o W 1 - _. ~~a - ~ m -~ 1 - 4r ~4 .~ = ~ z u~ `- 34y ~ _ ~ ~ c iR p ,0ti 0(~l 7 ~ iX3 - ~ ec ~c~e 1 _ L~ i"~ 3 y1l~ 17 ~ _ Z 0 1 11 _ 1 ao ~ ~ U MAN - 1 ~ _ _, 0 u w a a u m wN Q O 4 - r - U W Z o ~ - N ~ ~ N ~ ~ Q N ? w , Z N W W K Y o w o ~n w z f z a ~ - o J U ~ .W F- o I 0 m s 1` ~ 1 _- ~, _ d 1 ~ 1 ~044b1 V ~ ~ a r 11r 1 ,tL ~~ N 0 -* 11 0 1 so ~. ~NI'I lylxa ,OI -1 _ _ Z ~ m v- 0 4 .no 0 of W ~~ \ ~, ~ 11 a 1 OO yl,G2y ~;~ ),u ~ ~ I ~ ,~ ~ 1 M ~. I ~ .~ ~ u tl u u l u .c ~ Q ~ or ~~\~ W~ ~~11 1 u~ [~1 s ~ a~aQU~ \ N N 11 1 ,fL 4L! ` N \ ~ I /•~~ ~ 1 W 1 1 r~ .u ~ ,;, :v r ~. I I g o f C Ille'Z m ~' ~ ~~ i m ~ m ~ ~ I W I ~ I c.. , 1UN '~M. 00,Oi, i I ~ ti h ~ i~ ~ `° ~ o N ~ ~ ~ r I W Z ~fF 2u 'N. DO,Op,GpS ~° - - ~ ~ ~ '~ - - -- '--~- ----~ o - I / o _ - e - ~- ~ it II II II II II ~ I ~ I ~ '~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ W I~ n / ~ b b V~~¢ v V _ ~ I Iv ~ ~ ~ r ICJ I ~ I~ «MaJ~~ ~- _ _ --~_= s\ \s~a~ I ` tl- ,ba >f~ 2 h ~ ~ ~^J 95 qd or s Z~~t- ~y .- ~ - _ - ~ _ a ~ t1G ~1yp f~ d -,,, yx ~ ~~ --~--~ Bbd y . / tiby 0~ '~~X~ A-12688-3.c ITEM NUMBER ~~ MEETING OF THE BOARD OF NTyEADMINISTRATIONNOCENTER AT A REGULAR COUNTY, VIRGINIA ~iINDROANOKE,ROVANOKEONCOUESDAY, January 26, 1988 MEETING DATE: ublic utility easement and a a 12-foot p dedicated to the SUB_ J~_ Acceptance of ce H. 12-foot wateoanoke bysDallas G 1 Jarrell and JoY County of R Jarrell COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS ~ ~ SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Jarrell are dedicating to the Jarrell and Joyce H. construc- Dallas G. unt of Roanoke a 12-foot easement for the loca io , ublic utilities and a 12-aowatereline Co Y tion, and maintenance of P and maintenance o construction, ro erty is located north of East for the location, This action is re- across their property. This p P, isterial District. ublic use. Drive in the Hollins Mag uired in order to dedicate these easements for ed on October 27, q 102787-4 adopt Administrator to accept Pursuant to Ordinance the County 1987 the Board authorized dedications of noncontroversial real estate mat ers. donations or FISCAL IMPACT: None. RECOMMENDATION: consider this I t i s recommended thair tthe B onsent agendalY acceptance by resolution and submitted, Respectfully ~~~,~ Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney ~` .~ ________ ----------------------------- VOTE --------- ACTION No Yes Abs Bob L. Johnson/Harry p,pproved (X) Motion by: Garrett _.x C, Nickens Johnson x Denied ( ) McGraw Received ( ) x Nickens x Referred Robers To -_--- cc: File Paul Mahoney Cliff Craig Phil Henry A-12688-3.d ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR. MEETING OF THE BNOKE OGOUNTYEADMINISTRATIONNOCEN~I'ER COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROAA•/ ON-TUESDAY, IN ROANOKE, MEETING DATE: January 26, 1988 ECT: Acceptance of a 12-foot water line easement being dedi- SUB___ Elmer J. Craft, Jr. Gated to the County of Roanoke by and Nancy P. Craft COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: to the Elmer J. Craft, Jr. and Nancy P. Craft are dedicating construc- County of Roanoke a 12-e°of as w ter l~netacrossatheir property. tion, and maintenanc is ro erty is located on the south Thal a~tSontesROequired in Th P P, isterial District. the Hollins Mag ublic use. order to dedicate the easement for P t ber 27 Pursuant to Ordinance X987, the Board authorized donations or dedications of No. 102787-4 adopted on Oc o the CO oversial real estate tmatterspt noncont FISCAL IMPACT: None. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the B onsentaagendaly consider this acceptance by resolution under the Respectfully submitted, c~ ~ ' ~ Paul. M. Mahoney County Attorney .~ - ~ ___ --------------------------------- VOTE ------ ACTION No Yes Abs p,pproved ( ~ Motion by: Garrett ~._ Denied ( ) Harr C. Nicke Johnson _x_._ Received ( ) McGraw ~-- Referred Nickens _~._- To __- Robers .~- cc: File Paul Mahoney Phil Henry Cliff Craig A-12688-3.e ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOAKE OpUNTYEADMINISTRATIONNOCENTER COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANO MEETING DATE: January 26, 1988 Request from Roanoke Valley Alcohol Safety Action SUBJECT. Board for ratification and Program (VASAP) Policy ointments confirmation of Board App COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: ram (VASAP) has Alcohol Safety Action Prog Correction The Roanoke Valley a Court Community previously been supervised by of Judges from the various Program Judicial Board made uP leaders, served by the program. This board has decide communities being ro rams to community to turn over supervision of the P gThe members on the Policy Board. the program. which shall be called a Policurisdictions served by Board shall represent the 7 Clemens, Chairman of the Attached is a letCorrectionsuProgram ~ udicial Board, outlining the Court Community changes to be made. ointed Dr. Harry Nickens to serve a one The Judicial Board has app three-year term. year term and Ms. Betty Pullen to serve a Board The Judicial Board is requesting that the VASAP Policy ome an official County Board with future Roanoke f ° Cher bec the Board of Supervisors• the Board of appointments made by the Board of request that these appointment ointments lbe madeyby Supervisors, and that future app Supervisors. RECOMMENDATION: art of the It is recommended that the VASAP Policy Board be P and that Board of Supervisors Commitrs erat fmyland ncon f Bmathe~ one-year the Board of Superviso ear term of appointment of Dr. Harry C. Nickens, and the thine December 31, Ms. Betty Pullen. Dr ermlwill exp re December P1, 1990. 1888 and Ms. Pullen's t -~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ t~ ~~ Elmer C. Hodge Mary H. Allen County Administrator Deputy Clerk __________ VOTE ACTION No Yes Abs Motion by: Bob L. Johnson/Harry x Approved (x) Garrett x Denied ( ) C. Nickens Johnson x Received ( ) McGraw x Referred Nickens x To _______- Robers cc: File Judge Clemens Committee File ' ' ~' `:: ", r TWENTY-THIRD JUDICIAL CIRCUIT ...~- OF VIRGINIA ~ ~°' /+~ :\ ~'' CIRCUIT COURT OF T1IE CO U1`ITY OF ROANOKE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF ROANOKE G. O. CLEMENS. JUDGE ~ °'al p, O, $OX 1016 7ryn;~ THE CITY OF SALEM LE M, VIRGINIA 2d153 \ ,~~: ~ CIRCUIT COURT OF SA ~~- SALEM COURTHOUSE (703) 375-3042 ROANOKE COUNTY COURTHOUSE C703) 387-6083 December 29, 1987 The Honora$oardoofrSuPervisors Chairman, Roanoke County S.W. 3738 Brambleton Avenue, Roanoke, Virginia Dear Mr. Johnson: pars the As you are aware, for the last several Yvreferred Action Program, commonly Alcohol Safety Spp together with several other similar and associate Roanoke Valley erseen by a Court Community to as VA ervised and o programs, have been sup of Judge ThPr Judges Corrections Program Juclicia~ B ed by adhe uprograms. ro rams to various communities being the P g have decided to turnthe°Bylawsuofrthelprogram haveTheeBylawsdoa community leaders and Board. to replace the Judicial Board with a Policy the members rovide for the initial Policy Board to be the organization P eyed terms, After the appointed by the Judicial Board for staggthe program. ____. urisdictions served by the subsequent to be from the ~ initial appointment, expiration of the _ be_the__responsbilitY ointments and selection of___ln~mb-~--~h~`~' - aI?I? bodies making__up__the_area of,-__service _of -. - -- of the _ various _governi_ J~~------ -- " rams . the Pr~___._--- ,~-~ The new Bylaws of the Policy Board call for the Boar -" t of nine members representing the jurisdictions served to consis Roanoke County, Salem and the by the programs. Roanoke City, an Highlands each are to have CountiesreSShallly have d one All.egh Y Craig area of Botetourt and representative. our jurisdiction Dr. Harry Nickens and Ms. Betty --:---~ For y on the Policy Board. Dr. Pullen have been appointed to membership ointed for a 1 year term and Ms . Pullen has Nickens has been aPP ear term. These appointments are for been appointed for a 3 Y On behalf of December 31, of the respectiv ointments, I would ask terms ending these initial aPP ou lace the Judicial Board making ointments and that y P and confirm these app ersons or that you ratify our standing agendas so that thointed at the these matters on Y ointed or reapp their replacements might be app appropriate time. the Policy Board will For your further information, Action Program, the supervise the Roanoke Valley Alcohol Safety and the Juvenile Court Dolvbe ro rams will continue the very Community Diversion Pr These p 9 Improvement Program. to day basis by administered and direcsed D on cto day It is not anticipated that capable James T. Phipp , re will be any substantial Chan g~s Correct ons1CP ogr m t has the Our Court Commu Y in the these programs. enerally been recognized as nonereasonhethatt the spr gr m cannot g and there is Commonwealth, continue to have the same recognition• ial Board and all of the Speaking on behalf of the Judic rograms, we express our Judges who receive the benefits of these p bodies wha appreciation to each anddidl to tsee that t eserp ograms are in have cooperated so splen Y place as a service to our communities. V ry truly yours, G, O emens, Chairman, Court Community Corrections Program - Judicial Board GOC:c A-12688-3.f ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETIDNGATOTHEHROANOKE OOUNTYEADMINISTRATIONNOCENTER COUNTY, VIRGINIA HEL MEETING DATE: January 26, 1988 SUB_ J_ Confirmation of Committee Appointment to the Library Board COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The following nomination was made under Appointments and must now be confirmed by the Board of Supervisors, Library Board Supervisor McGraw has nominated CatawbaeMagisterial Districts four-year term, representing the His term will expire December 31, 1991. SUBMITTED BY: ~~~ ~. Mary H.-Allen Deputy Clerk APPROVED BY: P~' ~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator VOTE ACTION Harry C. Nickens/Bob No Yes Abs Approved ( ~ Motion by: Garrett x Denied ( ) L. Johnson Johnson x Received ( ) McGraw x Referred Nickens x To Robers x cc: File Committee File A-12688-3.g ITEM NUMBER d AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BORE OOUNTYEADMINISTRATIONCENTER COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROAN MEETING DATE: January 26, 1988 SUB~_ Acquisition of Sewer Easement COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: e McQuarrie to eor hbor' s The staff has receiv ads we queasement Ma roa home sand has found assist him in obtaining urchased property. Mr. McQuarrie has recently P ro erly and has led to that the septic system is not functioning p P contamination of his well. d Tans for the development of Queen's Court subdivision r. Approve P have allow a sewer line to be insfaeled in the street in fron o levation, Mr. McQuarrie can on1Y This McQuarrie's home. Because o ro erty ravity flow to the line lftionloflanteasementhacrosssthemp• P g some sheds and out would require the acquis in addition to moving adjacent to Mr. McQuarrie, buildings (see attached sheet). reed to change the design of The developer of the project has ag ro erty owners. Mr' Mlace the out the sewer line and work with ricepfop the easement and topconsider an willing to pay a reasonabloeepty owner is not willing buildings; however, the p P easement across his property. ALTERNATIVES: - Leave malfunctioning drainfield as is. - Allow Mr. McQuarrie to replace drainfield. _ the sewer system for Queen's Cou~to Subpivision to be installe um to the public sewer. Allow easement. as designed and require Mr. McQuarrie - Assist Mr. McQuarrie in the acquisition of the necessary FISCAL IMPACT: No funding is required. ~./ RECOMMENDATION: rivate developments, The County does not acquire eas~moe assist an existing resident however, staff feels a responsibility asement ( through eminent lth and safety may be involved. It is recommended that staf when hea this e be allowed to assist 1 andgthatnMr. McQuarrie pay for the costs domain if required), associated with this acquisition. APPROVED BY: PREPARED BY: --~ ~ ~' P.E Elmer C. Hodge Cliffo Craig, County Administrator ------------ Utility Director ---- _ __ ------------------- VOTE -------- ACTION No Yes Abs Approved ( ~ Motion by: Bob L Johnson/Harm Robers x Denied ( ) C. Nickens Garrett x Received ( ) Johnson x Ref erred McGraw x To Nickens x cc: File Phil Henry Cliff Craig ! \~A //, ~ ~. ~ .;, 690 M1~~~ n ? \®~ ~ ., ¢ ~~ I,oM~,~t-^c~ ,~ . ~r~ ~'~ ^°"~ l`J, ° / T~ ~ r ~~ '~~ ~KCV (C~ ~~_ (r ~-.-~-i-~ ~ ~, y~~E , 613 B~~~`,y~~y~"'~p'rr,~ ~~ ~ y7i/ 1 ,~.,n~~ i~~lG~' '0.\14° B/~~~: VICINITY ;/iF+P'F J .---- ~o fKE~ .aioF 0.R'. 'OivD ~" F`%~~'4~~~ ~E / p~~Y. Pf ~'. ~'. R~ ;tu.... ~P~' ., .~ 4a ~ ~. ~, r~ -_ ~~, ,.c.~t~ maFSr -a.... / _.~.---- ~ ~~ "'~~ ~RIGINq~ p~QN Ac 32.1 31 1.07 Ac 30 ~~' s\ L00 Ac ` / S e ~ 04 12 ~ c 7 / veal ~' °~ ~` 35 ' ~ ~ 3 ° ~ 2.25 Ac ` ` ~ ~ sow ` Cr ~ g yob s t ~6t 4 I!s ~O / ~~ / 1lt~ IU Itl ~~ N 1 1.04 Ac ~~ z 2 10 ~ / ' ~~~ I d ~T O a ADM ~ 6 ~ 9 a p~~s [+ 9 / '°se ns ~~ tit ~ ~ ,. T °. : ^~ I ~ / ~ y ~:s ~ ~ Rl ~1 ~w ~ ~s_qA` / 32 I `' ~ `~~ ~* / 1.20 Ac 31 I e 14 / / ~ ~ / I ~~ S h 1 t / w 13.1 13 egsy Sew ~ be c o aes ~' e` ^I EM 15 12 ENT ~ \ q~T 1.26 Ac g ~ Mo.~ •'~° «.. ~' q TE r i ,~ °° P~qN ~ ' 20 ~. . ~ a ^ ~~ ... .. ___ _- / ~9S B SL /oAn Eronpe/ico/ 16 CulAeron CUWC/l 3.98 Ac ~ / 29 / 3.33 Ac - DD e° / D° O O ' e ``F O / ~~ D" b AS vC 28 ~~, L 7 F~ / \ \ J \ °a \ 18 / ~.~ 1.70 Ac 27 \'7 1.14 Ac lD1 ems. ~ 1.34 Ac fU N~ ~~. ~a9° a A/rican ` / - Mt/nodes/ ._ Fni~cODOI S- DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC FACILITIES SEWER EASEMENT ACQUISITION PLEASANT HILL DRIVE 22 2.06 Ac A-12688-3-.~-h~ ITEM NUMBER~.._' NG OF THE BOARD OF SUPEADMINISTRATION CENTER AT A REGULAR MEETI COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNT January 26, 1988 MEETING DATE: a reement with Appalachian to enter into g electrical SUBJECT: Authorization ------ power Company to ma'ntain Clearbrook Par service. COUNTY ADMINISTRP,TOR'S COMMENTS: /~ r ~GL/~.~u-wt/J'~ c/~ SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: rov al, the Hidden Valley result of prior Board app alachian As a baseball field lights have been ThelApp ted an Junior High School tailed at the Clearbrook Park baseball fie a the associated electrireement vin order ins has installe power Company ht of way maintenance g fee simple rig for electrical service requires a ress and egress access lawful ing to gain maintenance. FISCAL IMPACT: None RECOMMENDATION: pending review by the Administrator to enter int power CompanY- granting easement for the purpose of repair at the Clearbrook Par Attorney, authorize t alachian County o an agreement with thhtAop way and a utility service rig electrical servl fi i~intenance and k lighted basebal AppROVED: SUBMITTED BY: ~; ~~ ~~ c~~~`~~ Elmer C. Hodge H, Carpenter Director County Administrator Stephe _-- parks and Recreation _____________________ -------- -_------- VOTE Abs -------------~-_----- ACTION No Yes Bob L. Johnson/Harry x Approved (x) Motion by: Garrett = x - C, Nickens Johnson Denied ( ) McGraw - x - Received ( ) Nickens _ x Referred Robers - - to cc: File Paul MahoneCarpenter Stephen H. THIS AGREEMENT, made this Bth day of September, 1987, by and between 7HE RUANOKE CUUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY SUPERVISORS herein called "Grantors" and APPALACHIAN POWER COMPANY, a Virginia corporation, herein called "Appalachian". , WITNESSETH: That for and in consideration of the sum of One Dollar (51.00) cash in hand paid to Grantors by Appalachian, the receipt whereof is hereby acknow- ledged, Grantors hereby grant and convey to Appalachian, its successors and assigns, right of way and easements with the right, privilege and authority to Appalachian, its successors and assigns to construct, erect, install, operate, maintain, rene-v and remove a line or lines for the purpose of transmitting electric power overhead, including electric serivice lines and extensions therefrom, in, on, along, over, through, across the following described lands of the Grantors situated in the County of Roanoke, State of ~ Virginia, and being shown on print of Appalachian Power Company Drawing No. t R2283, dated 9-3-L'7, and entitled "Proposed Right of Way on Property of the Roanoke County Board of County Supervisors", located on the westerly side of I Indian Grave Road, Roanoke County Clearbrook Park, attached hereto and made ,_ a part hereof. TOGETHER with the right to Appalachian, its successors and assigns, to install, place, erect, maintain, inspect, repair, renew, add to the n~~mber of, '' and relocate at will, poles, with crossarms, guys, anchors or fixtures, and string wires and cables, adding thereto from time to time, across, through or over the above referred to premises; the right to cut, trim, and/or otherwise ~. control any trees or overhanging branches which may interfere with or endanger the safety or use of said poles, crossarms, guys, anchors, fixtures, wires or cables; and the right of ingress and egress to and over said above referred to ! premises, and any of the adjoining lands of the Grantors at any and all times, ! for the purpose of installing, placing, erecting, maintaining, inspecting, ~ I i I u s, anchors, wires, repairing, renewing, and removing its poles, crossarms, g Y to transformers, fixtures and appurtenances, and for the purpose of adding the number thereof, and for doing anything necessary or useful or convenient for the enjoyment of the easement herein granted; also, the privilege of 1 removing at any time any or all of said improvements erected or installed in, on, along, over, through, across or under the above referred to premises as may be required by Appalachian for the full enjoyment or relinquishment of the rights herein granted. Hppalachian will indemnify and save the Grantor harmless against any and all loss or damage, accidents or injuries to persons or property, whether of aql the Grantor or of any other persons or corporations arising in any manner • from the negligence of Appalachian in the construction, operation or ,~~,' maintenance, or failure to properly construct, operate or maintain, its ~ facilities installed upon or under the right of way granted by this agreement. ' TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same unto Appalachian Power Company, its successors and assigns. It is agreed that the foregoing is the entire contract between the parties hereto and that this written agreement is complete in all its terms and provisions. i yy t '380.350 A 2 ITEM NUMBER L-- _ / AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANORE COONTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: January 26, 1988 SUBJECT: Status of Well Drilling Program COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR' S COMMENTS: ~, ~ ~ li / y / /(f •`/,,~~{{/~~.-y/yy ,~~~y~ ~ /,/////~~~j/ ,r may/ /jr''j ~/////f (y f~ L -~,~/1/ u _I /~J-~~/~'1 Y'v..' 1 l+ `~1.' ~ l/~"y~ ~ _J V I ///~~I [~"'m/Z'K! ~ /~"r ~~ l ~ ~ " y . l ~ V"V'/ t~Jl SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The 1985 Bond Issue approved a $500,000 expenditure for the drilling and development of wells in Roanoke County. The staff feels it appropriate to update the Board on the status of this project at this time. This report along with "Attachment A" explains what has been accomplished to date, what is planned for the future, the problems both encountered to date and anticipated in the future, and a cost summary. The geological firm, Geotechnics, Inc., selected by the Board of Supervisors on September 24, 1985, was contracted to determine potential well sites in the County. Geotechnics has reviewed the available geologic data for Roanoke County and selected several general areas in which there is a potential for developing wells with satisfactory water quality and quantity. In South County, the Starkey area adjacent to Back Creek, and areas along the Blue Ridge fault zone appear to be good locations. Because this is the area in the County that presently has the greatest need for additional water, the majority of our efforts have been concentrated here. To this date, three wells have been drilled in this area, two additional sites are scheduled for drilling as weather permits, and negotiations are continuing on three future sites. The majority of the remaining property in this area is either already developed or the property owners are not willing to sell. In North County, no locations have been selected due to generally poor quality of ground water (hard water with iron and sulfur). It is not anticipated that any future sites will be selected in this area. In East County, the Bonsack area adjacent to Glade Creek has been selected as a potential source. Presently one site has been selected and drilled in this area. With the recent installation of the 460 water line, the new Bonsack well, and the existing County wells, this area has a reasonably good supply of water and has not received high 1 L-/ priority for drilling. Attempts will be made to acquire additional sites in this area, however, drilling will not be pursued at this time unless sufficient sites cannot be located in South County. The four wells drilled to date have all had good yields. The two wells drilled in Starkey have capacities in the range of 600 gpm while the wells in Hidden Valley and Bonsack are in the range of 200 gpm. One of the Starkey wells is being abandoned due to high turbidity and a direct connection to surface water. It is anticipated that the remaining three wells will be placed in service although the Hidden Valley well will require screening and the remaining Starkey Well may require treatment for turbidity. The present expenditures on this project total $179,533.01 with additional expenditures of $124,000 required to put these wells in service (not including a treatment plant for Starkey). This total expenditure of $303,533.01 results in an average of $75,000 per well. For a more detailed analysis of each well, future sites, and associated costs, please refer to "Attachment A". FISCAL IMPACT: Funding for this project was approved by the 1985 bond issue. SUBMITTED BY Cliffo raig, P.E. Utility Director APPROVED BY: ~~ ~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( > Referred To Motion by: Robers Garrett Johnson McGraw Nickens 2 ~~ ATTACHMENT "A" STATUS OF WELL DRILLING PROGRAM Starkey Well No. 4 The first well drilled under the present program was Starkey Well No. 4. This well was drilled iri Nroee b Y aTheDwell b sr 450 1986, on a portion of the Starkey Park p p feet deep and was tested at flows between 600 and 850 gpn-. During the two initial pump tests, (48 hours etrie water formed in December of 1986, and February of 1987, remained turbid (dis ~ 1lrwasoaffe ated,. aIn efforts totclear neighboring residential u mping was performed during April, MaY- up the well, prolonged p m. This and June of this year at rates between 200 and 400hepturbidity pumping resulted 2iandu25tNTU's. c1The1Sgate Board/of Health re- remained between quires that drinking water not exceed 1 NTU under normal condi- tions. Because of costs associated with leasing a test pump, the urchase a test pump. The test pump should be staff has opted to p delivered in January o~ wells •and t lis hop d thathwithr cont pnued ing of this and othe pumping, the turbidity of the water will continue to improve. Because of the high produtTeatment plant for this areahif well, the staff will consider a um in the turbidity is not reduced by p P g• ctarkev Well No. 5 Well No. 5, also located in Starkey Park, was Starkey drilled in February of 198~ed flowwof1400sgpm filled to a depth o 165 feet and had an estima the first hour of test pumping the well in March of During to dark brown. The pumping 1987, the water turned from mlto 260 gpm after two sinkholes were rate was reduced from 400 gp noted that afternoon . Two am din 1O ate was kfurtherwreduced to 240 following morning and the pu p g gpm, Pumping ws stopped on the second afternoon when there was no indication that the water was clearing. After discussions between the County staff and the geolo- gists from Geotechnics, it was felt that a mud seam between 74 and 76 feet had a connection noMaheofu1987~ thew mudaseam was sinkholes and muddy water. I y sealed to a depth of 125 feet. 3 ~---1 A second pump test was cleared after pumping for about two hours. The water sinkhole ws noted adjacent stopped, water rose in the nection between the well and Because of this connection, as a potable water source. Hidden Valley No. 9 performed in June of 1987. The water ten minutes and remained clear for then became increasingly darker and a to Back Creek. When pumping was sinkhole, indicating a hydraulic con- sinkhole at a depth below 125 feet. Starkey Well No. 5 has been abandoned Hidden Valley Well No. 9 was drilled in July of 1987, to a depth of 348 feet with an estimated flow of 200 gpm. During drilling, there were some problems with fall-in from the well and after removing the drill rig the fall-in was measured at 50 feet. The well was pump tested for 48 hours in August of 1987, at a rate of 194 gpm. The turbidity of the water near the end of the pumping was measured between 2 and 3 NTU's. After removing the pump in September of 1987, the fall-in was measured at approximately 130 feet indicating the need for screening the well. The installation of a stainless steel screen should eliminate the problem of fall-in and in conjunction with further pumping, reduce the turbidity to an acceptable level. The County staff is presently working with the geologist and well driller on the proper screen size and installation. Bonsack No. 1 This well was drilled in August of 1987, to a depth of 600 feet and has an estimated flow of 225 gpm. This well will be pump tested by County staff after the test pump is received. The quality of the water is expected to be satisfactory and the well will be connected to the recently installed 460 water line. Future Sites The present available data indicates that high yields (>100 gpm) could be achieved by drilling new deeper wells 1 N l i near the Arlington , o. s l following existing wells: Arlington H and Carolyn Heights. Forest, Arlington Hills No. 2, Layman Lawn, The driller is scheduled to begin a new well in Arlington Hills as soon as the weather permits, with a new well lls will be in Layman re-drilled Lawn immediately following. The other we wells produce a significant quantity of wa if th ter. ese only Negotiations are presently under way with Ezra Wertz and Dorman Hawley for potential well sites in the Castle ddit Rock area ional site and with T. D . Steele and Elbert Waldron for an a County Attorney's office is presently Th e in the Starkey area. 4 L-~ working on option agreements for these sites. Staff will keep you abreast on the status of these negotiations. Another promising well site has been located in the Canterbury Park Subdivision, however, access to the site would be across existing lawns and acquisitions would most likely require condemnation. TheSetmosthwellstinothiseareaaarewhardstoevery North County becau hard in quality (i.e. North Lakes). Summary The well drilling program has thus far had limited success in that the wells drilled have all produced good yields. The problems have been in the quality of water and securing suitable well sites. Experience has shown that groundwater obtained from the upper portion of the Blue Ridge fault zone is more likely to be softer and have lessTherlarger flowshwill be obtained by penef water are much less. trating the fault zone into the deeper carbonate rocks where the risk of harder more turbid water is greater. In wells that penetrate highly broken zones, it will most likely be necessary to install screens to reduce fall-in and/or turbidity. Although this is a relatively expensive procedure, it is the only reasonable option for utilizing such wells. Although developing the wells that have been drilled has been a problem to date, the acquisition of future well sites is even a greater problem. The Blue Ridge Fault is much steeper than previously thought, which means that high yield wells must be located within about 500 feet of the fault trace. This significantly limits and complicates the selection of well sites since the majority of this area is already developed.w 11 have to fully utilize the area along the fault, the County to seriously consider condemnation and purchase of properties that are potential well sites, possibly including some homes. Note: Portions of this report were supplied by John Outright with Geotechnics, Inc. 5 ~..-~ / COSTS General: i Bond Expenditures Geologist (locating Water level monitor T t ump potential well sites) es p Variable speed controller for pump Meter and recording equipment Sub-total Starkey #4 Geologist Drilling Stone Extra Pump Test *Well house and site work *Pump, controls, interior piping *Water line to connect to existing system Sub-total Starkey #5 Geologist Drilling Install Monitoring Wells Monitoring Groundwater Sub-total Hidden Valley #9 Geologist Drilling Stone *Site Acquisition *Screen well *Well house and site work *Pump, controls, interior *Water line to connect to Sub-total Bonsack #1 Geologist Drilling Site Acquisition Stone piping existing system *Well house, site work *Pump, controls, interior piping stem *Water line to connect to existing sy Sub-total $48,000.00 8,805.00 2,885.00 3,037.00 12,590.00 3,474.00 $78,791.00 $ 5,732.83 31,401.00 250.00 11,852.50 12,000.00 10,000.00 15,000.00 $86,236.33 $ 5,545.66 13,100 .00 2,354.64 3,102.78 $24,103.08 5,215.20 16,658.10 529.30 5,000.00 15,000.00 13,000.00 10,000.00 3,000.00 $68,402.60 $ 4,840.48 24,155.00 8,000.00 110.41 20,000.00 10,000.00 16,000.00 $83,105.89 6 L_ - / $179,533.01 Total spent to date Future Expenditures to develop wells (not includingifrnecessary) 124,000.00 plant for Starkey, $303.533.01 GRAND TOTAL *estimated cost to complete item Treatment Plant lant became necessary to put Starkey #4 in If a treatment p iven to installing an inter- service, consideration would be g connection between this well laattwouldnserveatheseewellsland Starkey Road. The treatmen P area. The treatment plant possibly other wells in the Starkey would most likely be sized for a flow of 1.5 MGD with the follow- ing costs: $1,500,000.00 Treatment Plant 150,000.00 Interconnecting Line 250,000.00 Storage Tank and necessary piping $1,900,000.00 Total 7 r ~-z O ~ O ~ O o 1 N 1 O ~~ ~ ~ ii i N O V' O O~ O a~ m e~+f VOY ~-1 .ND O N O O b e O~ Y N i O 1 W t~+.i [H+ ~ ~ m ~ ~ ~ N y y m ~ .O V'N_. tF+f V ~ a~+l N N ti ~ `g i ti V ~ ~? ~ d' T ~ ... ~ V ~i t+f ~ F m ~ v ~ ~I 1 OC m p " ~ ~ ~ ! ~ ~ w ~ > e+f 1 ~ ii Jt ~ ~ m O m i V' C y '~ S O N [~ S S N m O O~ F p m .O [~ m ~~0' N .O P~ `G e~ ~ ~+~ O N O O~ i n; H ~ x ~ O O O~ T Vf ~~ Pf F U1 m N m M Nlf N~ F m S .-~ i ~ O O y 1 i W ~ ~ ~ .m-' ~ N ~ M °+ l'7 ~ N N F ~ „y ~'~it i ~ ii Z m~ , r' O~ .-~ a'7 N H N M ~ f7 1 N O 1A O '~ 1 N 11 O~ [~ O~ d' N O~ Vf c7 ~ N ,i ~ V' ti M ~ y t+f ~ Vmt ~ .t+10 ~~!1 ~' VO' N S M N N d' M V' ~1' ~ 0 1 y ap r1 N !~ .p Vyf H O N m ~ ~ O O~ , F y i S m-1 ~Ol1 e++f {~ ~ '~ ~ ~ t0+f Jet` ~ p N r' N ~ m V' ~ P m N ~'It '~ ~ I ~ ~ 1i i N rl m r1 .O ~ N 1 aFO 1 ~ pp p pp p Q8p` ~ ~ C~! O ~ ~ ~1~ 'i O O Jt y O P .-1 M O O t~+i O O l~ n ^'~ V: lN+f' N~ N v n ~~ 1 w ~ S ~ ~ Iii ti t ~ r' N O~ F O m ti pl~ o O 1 [~ i~ S, .r O N N Vet ~ N~ m .'~+ N~ F N N~ ~O N CO .~ N N ~, N a7 N y ii .O O~ ~ N ~ O ra Vt 1 p /t m ~ ~' O~ .~ Y' N N N W N ~ N ~p O '1 1 O N Uf F Mt .O fIj ~ VNf ~ ~D ~ N CF7 ~ ! r' ~ d' r' i'~f ~ M H ~ ~ ~ ~ ~i ~ ~ y ~ a"f N ~ N t.rt .-~ y y t7 O ~ ~~ p, fit' .y N N N~ P S P m N~~ m N~~~~ N"` N~ a m O O O a~"f .D O m ~D .O O N d' r' N y y e'f N y~ ~O O ~ .Fp ~+ t ~D F .O T r' ~ ' ti y m F m ~ ~ .y0 y ~"~ ~ m F ~O ~ emO+f ~ p~ ~ u~'1 Jul .~O m ~ F .O H ~ ~ F M Z m N C C ~..~ m ti , ~ ~ i~ ~ N N ~ N ~ ~ ~ ' O .O O~ C7 O~ N y O m .~O ~ C7 ~ N ^~ _ O ~O H'1 .O O~ ^+ ~ [~~/'1 l~ m ~ ~ F ~"~ Vl ~ ~ N ~ ~ .p F M y N ~ y ~ m O n ~ F O .y M C7 r' .O u'1 V' O~ T ~O fm~l '~ ~ ~ ~ ~ J1 tit m ~ ~ m ~p m N N N rFa ~ N ~ N N N ti ~ [~ ^~ ~ ~ ~ 1~pff 11 ~ ~~ z F ~ ~+~~ ~ m ~ ono m~+~ ~' '"' r. ~ u m ~ ti~ m ~~ p .Ni i N P .-~ C7 N N W o,'.ai~ '" ~ .. ~ p0$0o0pooO~o~°gm ~c i emn emno 1~ n ~~ y{ t i {-~ O O OS O O N S p S O O O O Vt O O~ ~ ~ O i ti ii Y~ S ~ W 1' ~ G ~ Vt 00 N ~ lp~! N Gb~ F N N NOft N .~-~ P .N,+ ~ ~ .m~+ r' ~ N ,i Y V' O i y Iii W O S .-~ ~O~JJ S = F /~ O O~ t~1 O~ ~ N ~ 0 ~ is 06 m N P N PI N N V ~ , , N i7 m {a~ y W 41 OS6 W N W W ~ y w tea ~`~,~ m a y y ~ oVa yy y}ty~] m W ~ W ~ y O ~ N % Q Fp V~ F t+i ~ yy piW{{ tat y ,:y OG 7H W W P~ Z ~ i+i ~~. ~y" W W H W W N ~ ~ t~~i yH y p~ {.1 pypf ~ ~ ~ ~ d O y to 4f O ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ m O H! V y h ~"' W W yO S y~~ i.ZpO y Osil d !+ O W C~' O a~u ~ ~ J ~ ~ p:y G ~ W ~ ~ y rw (~ V' GD ~ w ~ p{ y i 33 ~ ^O~ W iw y GG 4l Z F 06 tom. ~°%~ W~`c~w W ~2.at`~~~=~iVI• N°~s~',,t~°," s W ~~ ``~~~ 5,~ S~ a ~. ~~~=~~25t~mSw~cYioWa~~y~~,°s.aFo~''~~ °° ~ ~{ s « F+ O~ i yW V H i C1 F D po t.1 w0-, ,V.t i N L. -- Z COUNTY OF ROANOKE STATEMENT OF EXPENDITURES ' SIX MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31,1987 GENERAL ADMINISTRATION $ ' BOARD OF SUPERVISORS - COUNTY- ADMINISTRATOR PERSONNEL COUNTY ATTORNEY COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE TREASURER r ELECTIONS __ . SESQUICENTENNIAL - FISCAL MANAGEMENT SUPERINTENDENT OF FISCAL MANAGEMENT "' COUNTY ASSESSOR CENTRAL ACCOUNTING - -- __ _ < PROCUREMENT __ __. _._"-_--_"MANAGEMENT & BUDGET I ` RISK MANAGEMENT JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION CIRCUIT COORT ~ - _ - _ _- - GENERAL DISTRICT COURT---__ _. ' MAGISTRATES '"' J & D DISTRICT COURT ~;e. ~ . _ _._ - CLERK OF CIRCUIT-COURT - COMMONYEALTH'S ATTORNEY ( PROBATION OFFICE -_ _.....VICTIM WITNESS E~ ~' PUBLIC SAFETY POLICING & INVESTIGATING HIGHWAY SAFETY COMMISSION ( ~ FIRE ;.. _ RESCUE SQUAD EMERGENCY SERVICES ~ CONFINEMENT/CARE OF PRISONERS ANIMAL CONTROL HAZ-MAT RESPONSE ' - PUBLIC FACILITIES "°, SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC FACILITIES ~ STREET LIGHTS ENGINEERING BUILDINGS ~ GROUNDS PARKS & RECREATION DRAINAGE REFUSE PARK DEVELOPMENT PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION GROUNDS MAINTENANCE EXPENDED z BUDGET ------____-- 147,245 ~ 80,761 55 46 168,638 77,371 46 200,150 92,378 48 126,423 60,640 47 448,704 208,743 40 449,542 181,240 44 177,629 78,502 18 105,148 19,312 80,632 36,161 45 47 603,640 283,848 48 351,465 167,921 52 203,328 104,914 - 47 81,903 38,745 92 808,380 742,127 133,345 7,306 .".. 5 17 .25,060 4,327 _ 46 969 446 34 6,516 2,245 _ 50 461,731 231,054 - 49 278,047 136,762 3 39,175 1,088 18 7,810 1,425 3,887,391 1,778,840 46 23 960 217 47 1,648,880 769,769 59 390,950 229,127 49 34,407 16,887 48 1,859,083 899,158 47 141,223 66,033 0 12,408 113,259 40,333 36 22 99,565 22,168 40 543,070 217,407 43 848,481 362,149 42 1,044,006 437,598 O (768) 40 1,465,718 579,884 37 0 _ 66,509 23,181 35 45 817,398 366,279 ~. :FINANCIAL STATEMENTS: PAGE 2 OF 3 L - COUNTY OF ROANOKE STATEMENT OF EXPENDITURES SIX MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31,1987 HEALTH ~ SOCIAL SERVICES 387,016 193,508 50 PUBLIC HEALTH SOCIAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION 1,729,545 801,990 614 342 46 41 PUBLIC ASSISTANCE 826,406 48,000 , 7,018 15 - INSTITUTIONAL CARE 984 94 64,988 68 ' SOCIAL SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS , ' D£VELOPMENT 057 111 58,326 53 . SUPERINTENDENT OF DEVELOPMENT , 269,259 96,732 36 ~. PLANNING & ZONING g2, 173 57,856 63 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 104,565 52,442 50 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 18,260 7,813 43 PLANNING COMMISSION 200 280 93,870 47 __ CONSTRUCTION-BUILDING SERVICES , .~ .... NON-DEPARTMENTAL -___ ._ ._-- 1;074,963 _ -....523,413 49 - _ - _ _....--LIBRARY _ _ __ - _ EXTENSION & CONTINUING EDUCATION 95,293 754,349 24,988 456,704 26 61 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS _ CONTRIBUTIONS TO SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS 20,000 -19,187 913 50 96 9 _ 556,120 , MISCELLANEOUS -- -------- --------- .' _ - - . _..24,247;650 11,230,485 46 --TOTAL -. _ .,~ ~ - ~ ' .~ -~ _ TRANSFERS AND RESERV - - _ _ 0 1,512 REIMBURSABLE EXPENDITURES 8 775,693 0 0 TRANSFER TO DEBT SERVICE , ___.254 469 109,250 43 - ____..___ TRANSFER-TO INTERNAL SERVICE - , 000 466 25 6,838,198 27 TRANSFER TO SCHOOL OPERATING FUND , , 717 235 0 0 TRANSFER TO UTILITY CAPITAL , 2 282,434 0 0 ~'~~ ~ '-" - TRANSFER TO CAPITAL PROJECTS , 72,239 0 0 ~- TRANSFER TO YOUTH HAVEN 0 0 .. `~ TRANSFER TO PATNYAYS 35 _ O 0 . - -- -TRANSFER TO GRANT--FUND _ 926 8 0 0 RESERVE FOR BOARD CONTINGENCY , 829,270 0 0 UNAPPROPRIATED BALANCE TOTAL TRANSFER ITEMS 32,924,763 ------------ ------- 6,948,960 ------------ - ------- 70- 8 57,172,433 8 18,179,445 32 GRAND TOTAL ________ ____________ Financial State~ents: Page 3 ~~~~ COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA RESERVE FOR BOARD CONTINGENCY Original Budget at July 1, 1987 $13,942 August 18, 1987 Regional Airport Expenses (Approved Administratively) (3,772) October 13, 1987 Valleypointe Project - Binder for Land Purchase (1,000) November 17, 1987 Land Acquisition Monies No Longer Needed to be Appropriated 49,390 November 17, 1987 Purchase of 2 Vehicles (19,233) December 9, 1987 Purchase of Microwave (Approved Administratively) (244) Balance as of January 12, 1988 39 083 Submitted by ~~ ~. ~ Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance L-~ CpU~ OF Rpp,NpKE, VIRGINIA FUND UNAPPROPRIATED E - GII~ Unaudited Amount at July 1, 1987 June 23, 1987 Jul 14, 1987 Y Additional Revenues from Septic Tank Fees Reappropriate Revenues from Sale of Courthouse (Memo: ~ Additional $150,000 for Sale of band bu bwlgltnot as General Fund~ri ral Fund) be Realized by July 28, 1987 August 11, 1987 *August 25, 1987 fitness Grant Revise Budget for Victim/H7~ den Road Storm Sewer Construction - aJ Sale of mountain View Technological Park Tract Reclassified to Capita Fund October 27, 1987 Completion of Starkey Park December 1- 1987 December 15, 1987 Valleypointe nditures as Excess Revenues over ape rt for the Presented in the Audit Repo Year Ended June 30, 1987 January 12, 1988 Acquisition of Ida Mae Holland Estate Balance as of January 12, 1988 $1,010,687 29,000 (25,000) (42,793)* (1,000) (10,200) (107,207) (67,010) (198,937) 1,052,806 (260,000) $1 38 3 nded level for fund balance for 1987-88 is $1.597,756, which The recom~ is 3 percent of the total General Fund budge . Sul~nitted by ~ ~~, ~. ~ Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance ~L~' ~ COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA CAPITAL FUND - TJNAPPROPRIP;rED BALANCE Beginning Balance at July 1, 1987 July 14, 1987 Sale of Courthouse Revenue iec~asified from General Fund to Cap Sale of Mountain View Technological Park August 25, 1987 Tract Net Proceeds from VDOT for Easement in October 13. 1987 Front of Vinton Library Balance as of January 12, 1988 Su~nitted by ~~ ~~~~ Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance $ -0- 25,000 107,207 6,180 --- 13~87 L -- ~, During the months of November and December, 1987, the following economic development activities took place: 1. Activities coordinated with the Regional Partnership included participation in the following prospect visits and hosting activities: A. Hosting Zhangjiako, China's Deputy Mayor Yang Ping B. New York marketing and prospect recruitment visit. See number 5 below. C. Out of state operations center considering site for 35 , 000 sq. ft. facility. D. Kitchen Cabinet meeting for increased economic development coordination. 2. Roanoke County received 41 inquiries during this two period. 37 of these inquiries are based on responses to advertising targeted to the end-of-year rush. The total of inquiries for this fiscal year is 95. 3. The following local companies were visited: A. Ingersoll-Rand Rock Drill Division B. Shimchock's Litho Service C. Roanoke Fish & Oyster D. Stewart Sandwiches E. Eastern Sales & Equipment Service Corporation F. All companies in the Southwest Industrial Park month number 4. The following local companies and individuals received a certificate of appreciation: A. Video Biz B. Stateside Imports C. Calcutta Casuals D. Subway Sandwiches E. Dr. Golf F. Nature's Outlet G. Dr. Bartley H. Micro Age Computers I. Willis, Damico, Apgar J. Cummins & Company K. Colors and You L. Cardinal Office Supply M. Sew and Vac Center N. Super 8 Motel & Waffle House 5. The Economic Developmene delesationsvisitdfromeXuanhuaaandfor events related to a Chines g Zhangjiako, China. Theandsinvitingdhimhtotconsidergfriendship Deputy Mayor Yang Ping relations between our two regions. L.._ 6.~ The division also participated in a marketing visit to New York prior to co-hosting APCO's table at the Governor's Report to Top Management. Through cooperative efforts of the Regional Partnership, nine companies were called upon and more than 15 individuals were met during the three day visit. Included were visits to representatives of two of the world's ten largest public companies. One individual representing a major Japanese firm was visited thereby displaying return courtesy for his having visited the County four months earlier. Special recognition is gtationotoPRoanokehCountyhtoaparticipate Saul for making the invi s ecial in the Governor's Report to Top Management. In addition, p thanks is given Dominion Bankshares N.A. for providing return transportation for the Roanoke Valley team through the Dominion Bank jet. 7. A visit to Richmond included the following meetings: A. Meeting with Regan Coffey of Advante Desigointerbrochure suggestions and recommendations to Valleyp design and script. B. International dientlofsEconomiceDeBelopmentCrestar Bank. C. Virginia Departm If there are questions or comments, please advise the Economic Development Division. ITEM NUMBER ~ "" f AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: January 26, 1988 SL7BJECT: Work Session--Individual On-Lot Wastewater Treatment Plants The County has received one request from a resident to install an individual wastewater treatment plant with off-site discharge to provide sewer service to his property. (Peter C. Eanes, Board action to deny on May 26, 1987). Subsequently, two vendors for individual wastewater treatment plants have requested that these units be approved for use in Roanoke County. The wastewater treatment needs within Roanoke County are presently served either by Public Operated Treatment Works (POTW's), i.e. Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant and Starkey Wastewater Treatment Plant, or by on-lot sewage systems with sub-surface disposal. There is currently no provision to permit the use of a privately owned wastewater treatment plants to serve individual lots. This work session was scheduled in order that staff can present their concerns on the use of these systems and in order that the vendors can give their presentation to the Board of Supervisors. STAFF CONCERNS: 1. Protection of the Environment: Individual on-lot wastewater treatment plants are owned and operated by the homeowner. There are no requirements for daily testing of the effluent to insure that discharge requirements are being met. 2. Undue burden on present or future owner: When discharge requirements are not met, the homeowner will be required to make changes or modifications in order that these requirements can be met. This may require major notification to meet new discharge requirements mandated by State or Federal law. 3. Encoura e develo ment in areas otherwise not suitable for development: Since the cost of wastewater treatment plants is higher than conventional septic systems, and since the State normally requires denial of an on-lot sewage permits, before they will consider a permit for the on-lot treatment plant, these treatment plants will be used mostly in areas that have poor drainage and or steep slopes. Further, the use of on-lot treatment plants will only be used outside the public sewer service area. This implies that the use of on-lot treatment plants will encourage development in areas that are currently not provided other public sewer, such as: school transportation, police and fire service, parks or libraries. 1 4. Private ownership of. wastewater treatment plants, either individual or community service, will lead to the same problems that we currently experience with private water systems and private roads. When there is a problem with a privately owned utility, both the State and the property owne r expect the County to solve the problem. FUTURE STAFF DIRECTION: If the Board of Supervisors feels that Roanoke County should consider the use of on-lot wastewater treatment plants, staff will start the process to amend the County Comprehensive Plan by presenting this matter to the Planning Commission for their consideration, public hearing and subsequent presentation to the Board of Supervisors. SUBMITTED BY: Cliffor r ig, Utility Director APPROVED BY: Gr~.u'"` Elmer C. Hod e County Administrator ACTION Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred To Motion by: VOTE No Yes Abs Robers Garrett Johnson McGraw Nickens r a /~~~~ / COUNTY OF ROANOKE PUBLIC HEARING CITIZEN INPUT FOR THE 1988-89 BUDGET The Board of Supervisors of Roanoke Count Roanoke Y Invites citizens of County to offer written or oral included comment for items to be in the budget for the 1988-89 fiscal year, An informational public hearing, to receive cit' held on Tuesd Izen comment, will be aY, January 26, 1988 thereafter at 7-00 p•m• as ma °r as soon y be heard, at the Roanoke County Administrati Center, 3738 Brambleton °n Avenue, S•W., Roanoke, Virginia, All interested citizens are invited to attend th' Is meeting, Please publish as a block ad on Tuesday, January 19, 1988 in the morning and evening editions, Bill cost of publication to: Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Box 29800 Roanoke, Virginia 24018 `' A P P E A R A N C E R E Q U E S T PUBLIC HEARING ON - ~ Gj (~~'~ ~ .~~ S C ~~. ~,~~~ Gtr- ~ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to /~c~-!) -# / recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so that I may comment. I agree to follow the guidelines listed below. WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. 1. Each speaker will have between three and five minutes available whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. 2. Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. 3. All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. 4. Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times . 5. Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. 5. INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. P L E A S E W R I T E L E G I B L Y NAME : _ ~ l~ GU ( I~~ 1'(~ ~ ~Z:~~/l~ ADDRESS : ?..5~ ~ ~ ~G' ~"P S (P v ~" C~ $ G~' 'I'°'~~ ~~ ,~ ,~ 4~wfl J° PHONE : ~ 7 ~ ( ~ ~Ss-- PLEASE NOTE: (After filling out, give to the Deputy Clerk. Thank you.) ROANOKE TINES i; wGklC-~VcnS i+U NUMr3tR - 115U57bo PUtIIISHER•S FEE - RGANuKE CGUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISGRS 3738 trRAMBLETUN Sw P U t30X 29800 ROANGKE VA 24014 STATt OF VIRuINIA CITY OF rtGANUKz X85.12 uFFIOAViT OF PUBLICATIuN I, (THE UN~ERSI~NEG) AN OFFICER GF TIMES-WORLD CURPGRNTION, t~HICH COR- PuRATIGN IS PUt3LISryt=R GF THt rZGANi1KE TIMES L WURLU-ivtWS, A OtiiLY PJEWSPAPER PUBLISHED IN RJANGKE, IN THi: ST%TE OF VIRt;INIA, OG I:ERTIFY THAT THE r1NNEXEC NOTICE hAS PUBLISHED 1N SAID NcWSPAPERS UN THE FULLGwItVU DATES O1/19/i38 MURNI,VG 01/19/88 EVENING WITNESS, THIS 20TH DAY OF JANUHRY 1988 c GFFiCER•S SIGNATURE ~-,~. ~ ~ ~uuNTY OF ROANOKE PUBLIC HEARING CITIZEN INPUT FOR THE 1988-89 BUDGET The Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County invites citizens of Roanoke County to offer written or oral comment for items to be included in the budget for the 1988-89 fiscal year. An informs= tlohal public hearing, to receive citizen comment, wilt be held on Tuesday, January 2g, -1988 at :~ p•m• or as soon thereafter as the matter may be.liQard, at the Roanoke County Administration Cent-°r• 3738 Brambleton Avenue, g,Vy Roanoke, Virginia. All interested citizens are invit- I ea tp attend this meeting. P57RR1 PETITIONER: ,JOB CASE 51-12/87 Planning Commission Hearing Date; December 1, 1987 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: December 15, 1987 1• RDQUEST ~~ Petition of John Newcomb to rezone 1.714 acres from R-3, Residential to - Business to construct a restaurant, located at the northeast intersection of B 2, Heather Drive and Route 419 within the Windsor Hills Magisterial District. Glen 2• ~TTZEN PARTICIPATION There were 28 County residents and 11 city residents in opposition a Planning Commission Public Hearing. Concerns are: increased traffic ont the Heather; devalue hares; increase in accidents; storm drainage; reduced efficlelen of highway 419 with added commercial establishments. support of the nom' petition. A petition was r Two were present in of those in opposition. P esented containing over 60 signatures 3. SIGNIFICANT IMPACT FACTpRS a. 4. PROFFERED CONDI'T'IONS a• Property will be develo b. Use will be limited to a~restau~n~aslshown on said site tie site plan. c. Ihur-psters will be located behind the restaurant as shown on the site plan. d. Lighting will be directed inward and not exceed 14 feet in height. e. Architecture will be compatible between the two buildings. f. Signage will include: (1) Sign on Route 419 not to exceed a total sq.ft. including the Hop-In and Burger King sign. (2) Drive-thru menu si n8 (3) Directional signs. There will be no temporary and portable signs on the property. 5. OONA~IISSIONER'S MOTION, VOTE AND REASON Mr. Gordon moved to deny the petition. roll call vote: Ate: Flipper, Gordon, Jones ~YS: Witt, Winstead ~5~: None 6. DISSENTING P~pECTIVE a. No dissenting perspective given. 7. ATTACF~NTS Concept Plan Vicinity Map Staff Report Other: Street Capacities: Existing convenience store vehicle trip ends per da generates approximately 800 restaurant will generate an0additional 1,700 vehicleltrid en y). Pro vehicles will visit the site dail Posed Peak ADT for the time y ) • 1986 ADT for Route 4 19 was 8y 530 ~ period, noon to 1 p.m. is 1,870. (8~" x 11") (8~" x 11") The motion carried with the following ~~~. Ro rt Stalzer, Pla in Carnnission Secretary Y + ~~ ,p T ~ _~ ~ _ _ (a ~ ~~ '- .p;,," U _2 W V ~~A~ ~~+6' ~~5~ ~~ I \, ~I• abOy ainoi rrnl.~yln T / t~;5"~ -._ ~.~ ~' ~~I3y,17~,3 A ~^ ` '~-_ ^_o I~1 ~_ !s ~ __ _ ~: a ___---_ I ~~ i + ;A Ae is ~ re F ~ 'i 1~/ -~ j- ~5aw Sz - ~ '6r ;t vi f \' 2', ~ I, g~ I . ~~ ~ o u I :.~ u• ~~n 0 ~N b~ 1 i 3~ ~' W 3 ~9 p j ' vt o . ~~~~ ~~~~ ~ ~s G ~ ~ '~ ~ cz ~~ w~ & ~m e ~~' a~ ~ ° ~ a~~ ~i Fv Y~ ~~ ~I~ 1L kl I 3 ':aot~ ~~ f,t. i N [ L ~ W ~ i i I _J i i I ~ \~ ,. I ~~ i ~3~~ ,~ i a; , I ~~ Ws Y01 ~ ~T I ~ I I In QO ~~~ 1 gF i ~ Q_ ^ ~'c ~ ri I I:al i I I I i ~ ~ I I d' ~ I lY i ~~ f I W I I ~~ ~ 2 ~ ~- ~ Q 1 ~ w ~ ~~ ~ z o<, ~ - I fti ~ Q~ W ~: r z ~I ti~ /I r ,j ~ ;!f .Y i I a 7 ~ ;' ~ \ ~ ;, a '. / ~~ - *~,tiy b ~ o dy , ,~ ,: ~s' ~ € ~~ ~ ~, i s ~. ocr i ~~ ~~ ~ v ~~ ~ ~ i %, T~ F R HI yA ~~ '_lw°C~~ g aK ~ (~V, ~I~ f ni~ ~ ~~%~GRANDIN ~ R0. EA~..~4..~~-.~,_..-r~.t~.,6°\~ / - Mr $ neEat f"rcetq-..'6~7 .~*?J :a/~p.J[^~,~'c~^c~~- v,~ / pY'C At eROWr~,. D1r ~Vq~~ ~C7 BOwEII RD 3 ~uwD ~,a?"d1' `~SUCk~C~gE'~Si. \ 1~- o oT~~~ ~../_ '''_ IIAN ~ ec ~h ti4 \ `. S~4~RE11p '~ ?~ ~ `Ci VICINITY MAP ., ~/~~~ ~ \ i v~ CP`~~ ~ / ~' c \ ~~~/ ~~. 1 \ / 'Q ti \ ~ ~-..~ O 1 = I ~ 32 ~p~' / ~~ '~~ ~ `6, b 5 '° 9 / "•.. ~ ~ ~ ~_f B Ay 27 19 / i 29 • ~.• M H ~ • ; • 21 a`. 26 _ .0 zz u °~- \ - G~ B ~iZ \ • 2q .~ `• e ~ ~~ ro,\ ~ ~ ~ p ti \ E t 7 v6 \ \ ' 6 .3 ,A II t ~ ~ ,.~-~ 3 <0 3 b o, Z 5 ~ 16 _ .~9'' ~ ~ \ I n1' \ - .. '~ s 3 IB , ,r ` ~ _ z ,~ ROANOKE COUNTY „E ~ DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT ~~~~ ~ ~ $ ~~ _ _~ ~~~` , a f°' q eat r ~LL -:~ 1T_NNE ~q~q++aa~~~yy,, DILL Oq "~~nM` Y ~-. '• CRE~7HIlt fie. $ ~2 oa ~ •~ ~•~E~ E/{ ~, ~_ ~~ ~ ~~ 31 \ ,~ a-Z R 3 \ LM,Ec \ r~ \ ar t9 \ s _ I I 1 ' 13 , \ I 22 1 121 ~ ~ I I I~ IR_~ I 1 I I 1 \ I I 1 R ~ ~b ~ ' I I 2 5 ` »I» 1 I R- ~ I 1 123 I R-3 ~ 12, i. 8~ I I I John Newcomb R-3 to B-2 ~~vrt 1 h !8~-.:L 1 I I~ i' I 3 I 1 P I I I ft I• I 1 CASE NUMBER: 1. 2. REVIEWED BY: 51-12/87 ROB STALZER~~ Petition of John B-2, Business to i n tersection of Hills Magisterial STAFF REPORT PETITIONER: JOHN NEWCOMB DATE: NOVEMBER 25, 1987 ~' Newcomb to rezone 1.714 acres from R-3 construct a restaurant ~ Residential to Glen Heather Drive and Route 419dwithinethe rtheast District. Windsor NATURE OF REQUEST a• Conditional rezonin Aerate a fast food restaurant and to remove aodcreconstructaa a existin store. Rezoning petition pertains onl g convenience property that will include the restauranty to that portion of the b• Attached concept plan and zoning vicinity map descri more fully. be project APPLICABLE REGULATIONS a• B-2, General Commercial District commercial and office uses. ~ permits a wide variety of restaurant on the Proffered conditions limit use to a portion of the property to be rezoned. b• Site plan review will be required to insure com li County regulations, p ance with c. Commercial entrance permit will be required from VDOT and City of Roanoke. the 3• SITE CHARACTERISTICS a• Topography: Site is moderatel Convenience Store and Route 419. y sloped towards existin g Hop In b• Ground Cover: Shrubs, trees and existing buildin . 4• AREA CHARACTERISTICS g a. Future Growth Communit Priority: Situated within the Windsor Hills Commercial infill isgencoura d s l g na t ed f o r stable growth. g urban services are available. b. General area is densel multifamily residential asy well asopommercial andgofficemil y and 5• LAND USE IMPACT ASSESSMENT uses. Rating: Rate each factor accordin action. Use a scale of 1 through 5,g tO the impact of the 1 = positive im act proposed 4 = disruptive impact, 5 p 2 = negligible impact, 3 = manageable impact, = severe impact, and N/A = not applicable. RATING FACTOR COMMENTS LAND USE COMPATIBILITY ? a. Comprehensive Plan: 1985 Comprehensive Development Plan has placed this area within a i n conformance Core land use category. Petition is specifically Policwith the land use plan ma y C-1 (mixed use urban devepoamen Policies, P >, Policy a 2 3 3 2 2 2 2 4 3 C-2 ( served b >~~, site desig Y arterial highway) and Policy C-4 (coordinated n)• Proposal is consistent with the ado Frontage Development Plan suggested 419 Fronta Future Land Use Guidepted 419 that recommends ge Development Plan and the general commercial Development Concept retail. shopping centers/planned b• Surrounding Land: Commercial, multifamily resident' lane arterial highway, collector hi hwa ial, four specify the height, direction and ~ntensityeofttheer should lighting for both the restaurant and the convenience store proposed c• Neighboring Area: Single and multifamil • commercial and institutional, heavily traveled arteriallhe hwaal, d• Site La out: g y• Y Access will be shared. in unified grouping as o Buildings will be placed Parking will be shared, pP°sed to piecemeal development. the perimeter. Extensive landscaping is is potentiall Interior circulation between the tworbuildings Y awkward with customers backing from parking spaces into main traffic aisles. Glen Heather Drive is free of traffmcrobstructionaccess off of of dumpsters should be specified. Positioning e• Architecture: Existing a part of a unified site fast food restaurant and compatible. Architectural f• Screening and Landscape; plan proposes landscaping g• Amenities: Adequate h. Hop In will be torn down and rebuilt as concept, Architecture for both the the rebuilt convenience store will be appearance not secured by proffers. As per ordinance. Proffered concept that exceeds ordinance requirements. parking available. Natural Features: Site topograph modified to accommodate restaurant•wlll have to be significantly be negatively affected. Natural features will not TRAFFIC 1• Street Capacities: approximatel Existing convenience store t h e s i t e Y 800 vehicle trip ends per da generates Bail Y (400 vehicles visit additional 1 Y) ' Proposed restaurant will generate an visit the site da lhicle trip ends per da Y)• 1986 ADT for Route 4198 wasv281cles will ADT for the time period, noon to 1 p,m• is 1,870• 530. Peak J• Circulation: Petitioner has access off of Route 419 to serverbothrthetex stinf one store (to be rebuilt) and the point of additional proposed restaura t n1eTwo constructedPsonts of access onto Glen Heather Drive that the existing crossover on Route 4191may be used by southbound traffic. No traffic light will at the intersection of Route 419 and be installed Glen Heather because of its close proximity to the nearby signalized intersection o 419 and Grandin Road Extension, the two buildings is Internal circulation bet weep be required to back potontheltrafficwaisdles cause vehicles will Route 419 and Glen Heather Drive will not Access off of both vehicles exiting from parkin be encumbered by g spaces, UTILITIES ? k. Water: Adequate suppl y and distribution. ? 1• Sewer: Adequate treatment and transmission. DRAINAGE ? m• Basin: No problems noted. N/A n• Floodplain: PUBLIC SERVICES ? o• Fire Protection: ? P• Rescue: Within ia.~ -z Within established service standard. established N/A q• Parks and Recreation: N/A r. School: service standard. 1 TAX BASE (Fast food restaurant only) S• - Land and Improvement Value; - Taxable Gross Sales/Year: $316,300 - Total Employees: 60 $1.2 million - Total revenue to the County/year: Approximately $16 0 ENVIRONMENT - 00 ? t• Air: 2 2 2 2 6. 7. u • Water: v• Soils: w• Noise: x. PLAN CONSISTENCY This area is desi A Petitioner's request gsat~d as a Core land stated consistent with use category, policies contained within the the land use and the 419 Fronta e Roanoke Plan map g Development Plan, County Land Use The and Plan STAFF EVALUATION a• Strengths: convenience store willsbetremovedtandlrn a unified Policies. (2) Existing site co ncep t tha t wi 11 econstructed as a part of entrances, parking and landscaping, (3) Spec fic use a h aring of plan proffered. nd concept b• Weaknesses: the intersection ofoP°sal will cause additional Si na Glen Heather congestion at g ge should Drive and Route 419. (2) excluded. be specified by proffer, (3) Lighting and location Portable signs should be specified. (4) Architectural °f dumpsters should and proffered, comPatibilit be y should be specified Signage: Petitioner is si ns Proposing the installation of two g one for each business. store will be 4' x 6', the si The sign for the conven~e~ ce will be 8' x 8'. Both gn for the fast food restaurant structure signs will be supported surrounded by bushes (see attached by a brick proposed Signage has not been secured b graphic). proffer should be g y proffers. The portable si SOU ht eliminating the dis la Also, a gns on the property. P y of temporary or ~~ I~ ~~ d ~. r /8~ - ,2 VIRGINIA: BEFORE_THE_BOARD_OF_COUNTY_SUPERVISORS_OF_ROANOKE_COUNTY IN RE: A 1.714 acre parcel of land, enerally j FINAL OR_D_ER located at the northeast corner of Glen Heather Drive and Route 419, ~ within the Windsor Hills Magisterial j District, and recorded as Parcel #76.07-02-52, in the Roanoke County Tax Records TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY: WHEREAS, your Petitioner, JOHN NEWCOMB, did petition the Board of County Supervisors to rezone the above-referenced parcel of land from R-3, Residential District to B-2, Commercial District, for the purpose of the construction of a new restaurant. WHEREAS, after due legal notice, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing of the petition on December 1, 1987, at which time, all parties in interest were given an opportunity to be heard; and WHEREAS, after full consideration, the Board of County Supervisors determined that the rezoning be ~~ denied o 1/26 8g, ... ~~_ .. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDERED that the ',H000T, FERGUSON aforementioned parcel of land, which is contained in the AHER~N 6 AGEE 'ORNEYS-AT-LAN Roanoke County Tax Maps as Parcel \NOKE, VIRGINIA #76 . U7-02-52 and I ega I I y 24018-1699 described below, be rezoned from R-3, Residential District to B-2, Commercial District. / 8 -- .~., ~ ~ a 'HOUDT, FERGUSDN AHERON & AGEE '0 RN EYS-AT-LA'N \NOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-1699 g s a I revert to R-3. ,. (4) The dumpster shall be located as~se~fi forth on ~. the site plan. °~ Ek.. ~:~~ (5) All lighting shall be directed on to the property itself. (1) Property will be developed in substantial conformi~R~r with the site plan prepared b `~ Y T• P• Parker ~ Son, dated Nember 4, 1987, ,~~ (2) U~~ will be limited to a restaurant as shown on said site plan. '~~ ,, (3) No site wb.rk will be done on the property until Burger King approves `t project. Once site work is begun, the project shall be s~t3-r'ted immediate) and Y completed within 12 months. If co~.~truction is not ~. commenced within said 12 month period,~4'~~e zonin h I A 1.714 acre parcel of land, generally located at the northeast corner of Glen Heather Drive and Route 419, within the Windsor Hills Magisterial District, and recorded as Parcel #76.07-02-52, in the Roanoke County Tax Records t h t h e f o I I o w i n g~ c o n d i t~i~oun s~ _. _~ .. ~.. ~ .. _...~,~.."~°°_.--..~ ~.,~ __. .. ~ z-.. _.. ......_ BE I T FURTHER RESOLVED tha t a co ~,.,~,._,-~._...-~^~~ py of this order be transmitted to the Secretary of the Planning Commission and that he be directed to reflect that change on the Official Zoning Map of Roanoke County. 2 ~~~ 08~ _,.~. DENIED ADOPTED on motion of Supervisor Garrett seconded by Supervisor Robers ----_____ _____, and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Garrett, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYES: Supervisor McGraw ABSENT: Deputy-Clerk, Roanoke County Board of Supervisors r1.e11d.c cc: Real Estate Assessor Development Review Coordinator Planning Director HOlIOT, FERGIJSON AHERON & AGEE '0 R N EYS-AT-LAN WOKE, VIRGINIA 24 018-16 9 9 3 • VIRGINIA: /~' ~-~,, BEFORE-THE-BOARD-OF-COUNTY-SUPERVISORS-OF-ROANOKE COUNTY rn N Q H z w H z 0 U 0 E A W O a; a a RHOUOT, FERGUSON ~, ANERON 6 AGEE '70RNEYS-AT-LAN IANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-1699 IN RE: A 1.714 acre parcel of land ) located at the northeast cornernofally ) AMENDED Glen Heather Drive and Route 419, ) PROFFER OF within the Windsor Hills Ma ) CONDITIONS gisterial ) ---------- District, and recorded as Parcel #76.07-02-52, in the Roanoke County ) Tax Records TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY: Being in accord with Sec. 15. I-491. I et seq, of the Code of Virginia and Sec. 21-105 of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance, the Petitioner, JOHN NEWCOMB, hereby voluntarily proffers to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, the following conditions to the rezoning of the above-referenced parcel of land. (1) Property will be developed in substantial conformity with the site plan prepared by T. P. Parker S Son, dated November 4, 1987, (2) Use will be limited to a restaurant as shown on said site plan. (3) The dumpster shall be located as set forth on the site plan. The dumpster location shall be enclosed with a brick structure. (4) All lighting shall be directed on to the property itself. Lighting shall be on poles not to exceed 14 feet in heighth. i8~-~ (5) The only free standing signs which shall be permitted are: (a) of 88 square feet (b) (c) (d) permitted. Signage on Route 419 not to exceed a total including the Hop-In and Burger King sign. Drive-thru menu sign, Directional signs, No temporary or portable signs will be (6) Architecture will be similar to pictures presented to Planning Commission, Arhitecture of Burger King and adjacent Hop-In will be similar in nature, Respectfully submitted, JOHN NEWCOMB By ~ ~ ~ Of Counsel _----- RHOUOT, FERGUSGN ~, AHERON & AGEE TORNEYS-AT-LAN IANOKE, VIRGINIA 24 01 8-16 9 9 Edward A, Natt, Esquire Osterhoudt, Ferguson, Natt, Aheron 8 Agee, P,C, 1919 Electric Road, S,W, Roanoke, VA 24018 Counsel for Petitioner r1.e11b.c 2 VIRGINfA: BEFORE_THE_BOARD_OF_COUNTY_SUPERVISORS_OF_ROANOKE_COUNTY 1[ iRHOIJOT, FERGLISON T, AHERON & AGEE iTORNEY5-AT-LAN! p ]ANOKE, VIRGINIA 24Q1u-1659 ~ IN RE: A 1.714 acre parcel of land ~ PETITION located at the northeast cornernofally Glen Heather Drive and Route 419, ~ within the Windsor Hills Magisterial ) District, and recorded as Parcel #76.07-02-52, in the Roanoke County j Tax Records TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY: Your Petitioner, JOHN NEWCOMB, respectfully files this petition pursuant to Section 21-105 of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance and in accordance with the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended, and would respectfully show the following: I• The Petitioner is the contract purchaser of the above-referenced parcel of land. 2. The property is presently zoned under the provisions of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance as R-3, Residential District. 3. The property is designated Core in the Future _and Use Guide of the Roanoke County Comprehensive levelopment Plan. 4. Your Petitioner now desires to have this roperty rezoned as B-2, Commercial District for the purpose f the construction of a new restaurant. WHEREFORE, your Petitioner respectfully requests that the Zoning Ordinance of Roanoke County be amended and that the above-referenced parcel of land be rezoned as set out in Number 4. FURTHER, your Petitioner requests that this petition be referred by the Secretary to the Roanoke county Planning Commission for its consideration and recommendation. Respectfully submitted, JOHN NEWCOlV1B By ----- Of Cou -~------- nsel RHOUOT, FERGLISON T, AHERON & AGEE TTGP,PJEY5-AT-LAW ]ANOKE, VIRGINIA 24G13-1699 Edward A. Natt, Esquire Osterhoudt, Ferguson, Natt, Aheron ~ Agee, P,C, 1919 Electric Road, S.W, Roanoke, VA 24018 Counsel for Petitioner 2 A /~8 - 2 WE, THE UNDERSIGNED, residents and property owners of real estate in the area near the intersection of Glen Heather Drive and Route 419 in Roanoke County do hereby indicate our support of the rezoning of a 1.714 acre parcel of land at the northeast corner of Glen Heather Drive and Rt. 419 in the County of Roanoke for the location of a Burger King Restaurant thereon. NAME ADDRESS _~~~L ~Y~~~~~~~,~~ ~ - C: ~~~ ~~~~ 3~ ~~ ~ ~~~ I O /Z !~-~U ~~ n i /~ v~---S w' ~~ ~. f/ c ~~Lr_.-- _ ~, ~~ ==r WE, THE UNDERSIGNED, residents in the area near the intersection of Glen Heather Drive and Route 419 in Roanoke County do hereby indicate our support of .the rezoning of a 1.714 acre parcel of land at the northeast corner of Glen Heather Drive and Rt. 419 in the County of Roanoke for the location of a Burger King Restaurant thereon. NAME ~y: ; L`.~ ~~-'L~~iL ~1~t~~L'4 -r~-~_~_ . ~-~-` L J ^~ ., L --~ ~___, _____ ~~ ` G ADDRESS ~l ~ > r /1 /y ~ f , „~ ~~,; , ~_~__ ~' '~ is ~ "'~~._> ~.~=/~c % G ~ e o~ /l i/ ~ L ~ -- -- ------- f ~ • ,/ i WE, THE UNDERSIGNED, residents in the area near the intersection of Glen Heather Drive and Route 419 in Roanoke County do hereby indicate our support of the rezoning of a 1.714 acre parcel of land at the northeast corner of Glen Heather Drive and Rt. 419 in the County of Roanoke for the location of a Burger King Restaurant thereon. NAME } - ~~ ~ ---- ~' J/ ~~ ~~ ~~,~ ~ I' ,~ ~ ~a ~ ~~, ,: _~ .~ - , ADDRESS // /~ ~ ~ - F~ l~ ~~ it .~ w __ r~ ~ r ~ % ` ~~~-~ WE, THE UNDERSIGNED, residents and property owners of real estate in the area near the intersection of- Glen Heather Drive and Route 419 in Roanoke County do hereby indicate our support of the rezoning of a 1.714 acre parcel of land at the northeast corner of Glen Heather Drive and Rt. 419 in the County of Roanoke for the location of a Burger King Restaurant thereon. NAME ADDRESS -- ---- -~ ~~ ~A`~~~1 a' ~~ January 22, 1988 Roanoke County Board of Supervisors 3738 Brambleton Ave, S. W. Roanoke, VA 24018 ATTENTION: Messrs. Lee Garrett, Chairman Steven A. McGraw Richard W. Robers Bob L. Johnson Harry C. Nickens Gentlemen: I am writing on behalf of the Pines Home Owner's in opposition of the Burger King proposed for the Glen Heather Drive and Route 419. Association corner of The 42 citizens I represent are the owners of the 33 townhomes directly adjacent to the project. Although we share the same concerns voiced by our neighbors at the public hearing, our proximity to the proposed development adds particular weight to our position. We agree with the developer that an entrance onto Glen Heather Drive is the only way to grant this project any degree of safety, Access onto this street may indeed allow for the safe ingress and egress of restaurant endanger the lives of the rest of us whotmust use itll Glenously Heather Drive has no shoulders and is barely wide enough fox two cars to pass, It is already the main access to ouar• homes foodeoutlettandhgaslstationrthentro osedthe only nearby fast attract a large clientele from all over thisJpartwoflthercounty. Even if it were to serve mostly the surrounding neighborhoods, as the developers assert, then certainly most of the traffic will be routed down this narrow,unli hted The sight lines at the complex entrance (RoxburycLane~atoad, Glen Heather Drive) are quite limited, blocked by a hill to the west and a blind curve to the east. A school bus stop is also located just west of this intersection. Heavy traffic would make all exits dangerous, if not impossible at times. Furthermore, our attempts to avoid the long wait and dangerous left tern across 419 at Glenn Heather would force us to travel east on Glen Heather to Grandin Road Extension, then westward to t:ie light at Southwest Plaza. Certainl King patrons will also discover this saferyexiltntoo419hethusger further increasing traffic on the already inadequate Glen Heather Drive. The streets of the Pines also represent a short cut to Route 419, particularly when traffic backs up, as it surely will during peak periods, These streets are privately owned and mainta~.ned, Page 2 We are greatly concerned about the liability of ourselves as owners as well as anyone who is injured on private property, These streets were never designed for heavy traffic, They are used by pedestrians of all ages, but particularly by our children and our older residents. We fear for their safety if our streets become public thoroughfares. The increased exposure of our homes will also increase the potential for vandalism and theft, We can appreciate the desire to improve the look of the present Hop-In property and to provide the convenience of a fast-food outlet on this part of 419, However, we would rather be slightly inconvenienced than to sacrifice our own safety and that of our children and of our home. As concerned home owners and citizens og Roanoke County, we respectfully request that you join us in opposing the construction of this Burger King, S~ rely, The Board of Directors The Pines' Homeowner's Association Earle H, Shumate President ~~~~.. ,,. ' J '1 4930 Bower Road, S.W. Roanoke, VA 24018 Roanoke County Board of Supervisors P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 RE: John Newcomb Rezoning Request Gentlemen: ~~ January 22, 1988 I spoke at the last Board of Supervisors meeting on December 15, 1987. Because of the three-minute time limit for each speaker I was not able to finish my presentation to you, In order to save time at the meeting on January 26th, I will not request to speak, but am sending this written presentation to you so that you may read it at your convenience. At the last meeting I handed to you a petition with 64 signatures representing 39 households. In covering an area bounded by Bower Road, Route 419, Cordell Road and Kentland Drive, everyone I spoke to was strongly opposed to having a fast-food restaurant in our neighborhood. We all are concerned about the already dangerous traffic situation on Route 419, increased traf- fic on our residential streets by people seekin to avoid 419 devaluation of our property and the erodin g the our neighborhood caused b g quality of life in Cave Spring Corners and OaktGrovemPlazaalization of 419 between We have seen in the past few years development along this particular stretch of 419 which includes two new banks, Roanoke Orthopaedic Center, a dental office, Winterberry Pointe con- dominiums, Colonnade office complex and the Gwyn-Harmon office building. At the present time we have underway expansion of Southwest Plaza, a large Harris Teeter Grocer amoderately-sized Winn-Dixie at Southwest Plazasandenewpapartments under construction at the intersection of Grandin Road Ex- tension and Route 419. The traffic has increased to an intolerable degree for those residents in this area. I live on Bower Road and in order to travel southbound on 419 we have two options. We can either exit onto 419 from Bower Road, of traffic and get into the left-turn lanepatlStonybrookoDrives and 419, then make a U-turn against traffic coming from Oak Grove Plaza area. 0: we can gather our courage and take Bower Road to Kentland Drive Kentland to Cordell Road and Cordell to c=19 and try to turn left at this intersection. Anyone who has ever tried this will tell ou saw a two car accident at thisyinte~sectiontogrFridaisk. (I y, January 15, 1988 at approximately 2 p.m. An unmarked police car was there investigating the accident.) There is a day care center only a few hundred feet from the intersection for the proposed site of the Burger King res- taurant. There is an elementary school less than three-tenths of a mile away at Grandin Road Extension and 419. School buses travel through that intersection twice a day. Children at the day care center must be dropped off and picked up. There are 173 children enrolled at the day care center. On a recent morn- ing (December 15, 1987) I counted the school buses that travel through the intersection of Glen Heather Drive and Route 419. There were 23 buses carrying children to school between 7:40 a.m. and 8:40 a.m. I spoke with a Mrs. Carroll at the Roanoke County Bus Route Supervisor's Office. She said that on county buses there is an average load of 45 students. Some buses carry more; some less. That is over 1000 children going through that inter- section twice a day plus the 173 children at the day care center. (I am enclosing petitions signed b staff of Oak Grove Elementary Schooltwhotarehgreatlyrconcerned about the safety of the children and are opposed to this rezoning.) One of the claims made by Mr. Edward Natt, counsel for Mr. Newcomb, is that the restaurant would not create more traffic entering and exiting that intersection at peak traffic hours. Burger King restaurants open for breakfast at 7 a.m. and I think we can assume that if they are open for breakfast, people will be stopping in to pick up food at the same time our child- ren are traveling that route to school. Mr. Natt also claimed that to allow rezoning for a fast food franchise in the area would not be opening a "Pandora's box" for other fast food restaurants to come in. You only have to have to drive around the Roanoke Valley to realize that this claim isn't valid. When one fast food establishment opens up others tend to cluster in the same area. For example, on Brambleton Avenue in the Cave Spring Corners area, there are eight fast food places in a one-mile stretch. The Little Caesar's, Long John Silver, Pizza Hut,PKentucky~Friedee's, Chicken, Steve's Hotdogs and Ridge Runner Pizza. Clustering of fast food restaurants seems to be the rule rather than the exception. Mr. Natt also feels that if the Burger King were to open it would soon have neighborhood support. I really doubt if this would come to pass as residents of this area are very concerned about this type of development. We alread and bicycles cutting through our yards from heoeleoot traffic teenagers and youngsters) going to the Hop Ip. pA BuraerlKin would be an even stronger magnet for drawing more yougg people through car neighborhood. (2) There is a wooded area between Bower Road and The Pines apart- ment complex. This is a gathering place for young people on their way to the Hop In. They smoke (and it suspected that the smoking materials aren't always "legal cigarettes). On the way back they litter our yards and streets with soda bottles and cans, candy wrappers and cigarette butts. We have 16 houses in and Route 419. There are of the houses and retired the other houses. These their opposition known by on December 15th. the neighborhood between Kentland Drive widowed ladies living alone in three senior citizens in at least six of people are greatly concerned and have made signing the petition presented to you Gentlemen, for these reasons and fo by those who spoke in opposition to this I respectfully request that you deny Mr. quest. Sincerely, EnclosuY cc: Mr. Mr. Dr. Mr. Mr. 'es Lee Garrett R• W. Robers Harry Nickens Steve McGraw Bob Johnson r the reasons presented rezoning at the last meeting, Newcomb's rezoning re- ~~ ~. _ Wanda P. Manuel (3) P E T I T I O N 69E, the undersi ned g qualified voter (s), freeholder and or p (s)' / erson (s) affected who are residents of the City or County of Roanoke, Virginia, do hereb y strongly express our opinion that we do not desire to have a Burger King Restaurant at the corner of Glen Heather Drive and Route 419 (Electric Road). Reasons: A. That intersection cannot tolerate increased traffic at anytime of day or night. With a Day Care Center having that intersection as their only means of southbound traffic, a site of too numerous accidents, it would endanger more lives. THINK OF THE CHILDREN. B• Glen Heather Drive is an ingress and an egress road to the Pines Apartment Complex, which has numerous residents. C• Glen Heather is a bus route for both County and City schools. There are over 1000 childrenon City and County buses that pass through the intersection of Glen Heather Drive and Route 419 twice a day. THINK OF THE CHILDREN. D• Devaluation of property in adjoining sub- divisions. Name Address Phone Q. ~C~./~.Q.,,c,~.~.a_e..L., P~e~~ (,~ 3 ~4 ~ G ~•.d :., Rd . ~ tit. ~ , -.. ~S ~ F~.b. 1. a~i~o aroolc~;eld 17 r. S~J. 7 ~ ~-~Q Q3 s? o y ~~t l ,~.. ~- ~A G7~~ ' ~~ ~i J '"' ,-r 1 y- ~ Name L~. ~. ~, ;i, r / _~ ~~~~~ L/(,~1 `?~'~ ~ ~~. yam... Address ..,~ ~1~(-~ ~~,'. ~~ !l , ,. ~_~ ~ ~ ~~ ; . - _ y ~ ~~ ,~_•:.- - ,. ~ ~: _.< . , _~ ~ ~_ . _ _ ~; ~;-~ _ ,- ~ ~ '"-~ l l,- '~-- ~/~ D~ Lr~~.~1,./ ~ ~ d ~ ~~/ ~ Phone . ,; ii~~.. - - -~;', . '~ -sic y~s'~ - 6ts,G~ (~S/`,-C ~ ~~ ~~ ~,(9 CICr ~ ~~_ ~ ~ ~` k' a~,~..c,.. ,~: -a ~~ UGC -.~. ~ ~, f ~ ~ 7~- ~~ c; ~.. .~~~""`'.~° ,~/'' a ~ ° ~ &' 7 7 y ~~ 3 ~t Ste. ;~ ~~ ~~~ P E T I T I O N WE, the undersigned, qualified voter (s), freeholder (s), and/or person (s) affected who are residents of the City or County of Roanoke, Virginia, do hereby strongly express our opinion that we do not desire to have a Burger King Restaurant at the corner of Glen Heather Drive and Route 419 (Electric Road). Reasons: A. That intersection cannot tolerate increased traffic at anytime of day or night. With a Day Care Center having that intersection as their only means of southbound traffic, a site of too numerous accidents, it would endanger more lives. THINK OF THE CHILDREN. B• Glen Heather Drive is an ingress and an egress road to the Pines Apartment Complex, which has numerous residents. C• Glen Heather is a bus route for both County and City schools. There are over 1000 children on City and County buses that pass through the intersection of Glen Heather Drive and Route 419 twice a day. THINK OF THE CHILDREN. D• Devaluation of property in adjoining sub- divisions. Name r .1 ~. ,, r ~ 1 ~ ~ 1 _, .. -~ ",~ Address Phone ,. !, ~ : I .. ~ ~7 ~ !i ! ~ ~ - ~ "Z - ~ _~~~ _ "_ _ _ ~7~~ C~ ~, Name ,1 Address Phone ~ • l~ ~- Cj S/•3~~2ado~,vc re e r; „~ ~O a n d ~E'P~ v,~ ~ ~ O / ~,~~ ~ Hoc v ~~ ~~ ~ ~ a'G-~ ~ ~ v , 9~9-s9~ 7 ~/ -L~3 / / ems`/~O ~9~-i,j ~ z5~o~y Sw S- P E T I T I O N WE, the undersigned, qualified voter (s), freeholder (s), and/or person (s) affected who are residents of the City or County of Roanoke, Virginia, do hereby strongly express our opinion that we do not desire to have a Burger King Restaurant at the corner of Glen Heather Drive and Route 419 (Electric Road). Reasons: A. That intersection cannot tolerate increased traffic at anytime of day or night. With a Day Care Center having that intersection as their only means of southbound traffic, a site of too numerous accidents, it would endanger more lives. THINK OF THE CHILDREN. B• Glen Heather Drive is an ingress and an egress road to the Pines Apartment Complex, which has numerous residents. C- Glen Heather is a bus route and City schools. There ar children on City and County through the intersection of Drive and Route 419 twice a THE CHILDREN. for both County e over 1000 buses that pass Glen Heather day. THINK OF D• Devaluation of property in adjoining sub- divisions. Name Address Name `/~~ Address Phone yes ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ / ~~ a P. O. 130 ~IOIf3 iZOA\OIiE, VIKGI\IA 124005 January 26, 1988 Board. of Supervisors of Roanoke County P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, Virginia 24018 Re: John Newcomb Rezoning Gentlemen: At the December 15, 1987, public hearing on the request to rezone property at the intersection of Glen Heather Drive and Route 419 for a fast food restaurant, there was a discussion of the potential for accidents at that intersection. My personal experience may shed. some light on the issue. On the afternoon of June 8, 1987, I was driving south in the right-hand lane of Route 419 in moderate traffic when an automobile entered 419 from Glen Heather Drive, crossed the north bound lanes and stopped in the median to wait for an opening in the south bound lanes. The vehicle on the inside lane to my left reacted to the automobile attempting to turn south, and turned suddenly into my lane. When I attempted. to avoid this automobile, my bumper struck the bank on the side of the road just south of the entrance to Glen Heather, causing my car to flip completely over, front to rear, and roll onto its side facing in the opposite direction. If it had not been for good luck and my securely fastened seat belt, I would surely have been seriously injured. It is readily apparent that vehicles attempting to turn south on Route 419 from Glen Heather must contend with short sight distance and four lanes of heavy, fast moving traffic, and quite Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County January 26, 1988 Page 2 often must stop i.n the median area. Having experienced firsthand the hazards at this intersection, I hope the Board will consider carefully the impact of the proposed. rezoning on traffic safety. Very truly yo , ~.., E ne E. Derry e y EED/jaa !~~ 1 ~ I DO HEREBY REGISTER MY OPPOSITION TO THE GRANTING OF A ZONING VARIANCE THR,T WOULD ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTIO~J !1F A FAST FOOD RESTAURANT AT THE CORNER OF RC~4J'~ 419 AND GLEN HEATHER DRII/E. NAME ADDRESS i ~~~-~~, ~ -~~~`, .~t~f~,~ ~~; /~%~;ti,~;:~'~ .ter- ~~ ~3d:>?~~,~~~ G%-~ ~,~~~,~ ! 1.. it _/ ~~ ~ ~ ~ f ~~ .~ (~ ~ ~` ~ ~~~' , yam,, .~ ., :-. ,___ ~.....~ tel. tif-: ~..~.~,~ ,1 L<iL,~' ~~:~-•o ,' ';''~,~~~' ~ L~ ,~~.-~.. G-zi._''c,_, ~cc.. >..~- ~~J~ f<. /'~, .~ _ _ f ~~ ~ j~ c r_. ~ - L ~ _ ~ j~L~ ~ o-~ t. 't-~ 2~ ~i„i y' 1 C,~ ~' t r l / '~~ t ~ l ~ y , ~ ~ ~/~ ;~ ~ ~ ~; I DO HEREBY REGISTER MY OPPOSITION TO THE GRANTING OF A ZONING VARIANCE THAT WOULD ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A FAST FOOD RESTAURANT AT THE CORNER OF ROUt@ 419 AND GLEN HEATHER DRIVE. NAME ~~~ ~~~~ G~~ x_ -~,~ ~ ~ ADDRESS ~~ ~,;7 i'.2,.1o :v3~.~4'r~~. ~~ c~~ ~ ~~ ~~~~ U~~~f ~. ~.~~`, ~~~. ~~c~~~ ~,~~~~ ~... ,~ ~.~ ~fiwl~,r; ~ ~~ v~~~._ ~-~-- ~/ 7 ~~ %~-~ ~` ~ ~ I~ rv C~- ,)~`Z-~~ ~ ..~ f ,- ~,. ~ L` ~ ' _ Wit`, v_ ~_ ~ ~ __ ~ ~° ~ i., 7 ~, # _ ~- ~ ~~ G !/ L,~\! ,~ ,~ ~~ r y ~: ~ X~ ~ ~ ~ ~~s 's. ri1 ,. . 1`/ r / (' . r ~ Y y .L.~ L. •r 4, ~ ~ ~r j / ,r ,` y~ ~~ ~ ~~~. ex ~ . ~ /` % ' c' .~ ~ r' 7 j ~ Z %!~ 1 !f .. /• ~3 -, ~, / Y ~' ~ J, r Y 1 ~``" L;: y~~. ~/, , , ,~ ~~ ~ ~ / ,~ G.~~ . ~ca.r~.-~~~~' ~v-GVL~ ~~f;~ ~ C~~~~~_c~ ~ 7 o es -- C--- c~c,,~ s s ~ ~ C~3~'- 5 c.,~.. -- ~ : d' r ~ / ~- -~ ~'~ ~ v ~CT777o n> ~d,e ~ ` ,/°i°dSl 7Zd N ~v ~~ ~~ ~ ~. ~~. . ~ sue. ~~ `fib -~ ~k~y [.~~~, ~o a a - ~ ~~ ~~., , ,Sc~ yaa~~ ~ ~~ p/~' i - ~_-,- ., C.~,., _ ~ ~.;'~_~- ~ .- ~., ,t ~. ACV. .. ,~~ _~`^. =-r..._ ~.. ~,- -_ _ .- ~ ,.y "~ -. - ; ~. - ~~t J n ~Q~~ <. -~ ~ ~ ~ ) ~. ~-~` ~. r . C i ~'~ rC ..- /~ ~ ~,~_~ ~~ 1 -~--- G ~~ f > ,; .._ ~.: '~ _ / ~~_~ T ,- "~--' r .._ ~ `- /l -, .~~ /i .: ~r~ -X ~ ~ ~ ~`~ . ` . _ -, _ , ~~-_ ,~~. -~ ~~'-~~. ~~;~/~ -,,~~ --~ ~_ ~, ~. n ~~ The Pines, 440 Building PETITIOP~d AGAINST BURGER-KING IN OUR AREA........ .~ : `~~/c-~a-,rte ~G~=~'~"~6 ~. ~ ~~ ~. ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~`~' _.. ~- ~~~'' ~~ 7 ,~ ~~G~~d >'/ ~ ~~~~/~lZ~r ~~ ~~~ /~ - :~~ ~~~ ~~ ~~ 3 _ ,- `~~' ~ ,/ i a ~.v.. ~ ~ ,, ~z~ ~ ~~ 1 '' ~ ~~~~~' ~ ~!`~ '~ ~_,e ~ , ~~~~ ai,v~S'~ ~. _ /. __ ~ ~ f , / ~ ~~ ~. / r ~ ., ~ ?.-~ ~, i - ~. .w ~ i • , Fr _ ~ ~ . _ .. .. .., ~,. _ ,~ i 1 . < ..~.. __~,~...~. .,.._~s,,~., __.._ r~~_ .a_~ .__..._.. ~ ~ .. ....:.. .. _. _ , ,~ ........ , k.~ ~~ . ,~ ._~_ I DO HEREBY REGISTER MY OPPOSITION TO THE GRANTING OF A ZONING VARIANCE THAT WOULD ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A FAST FOOD RESTAURANT AT THE CORNER OF RgU~g 419 AND GLEN HEATHER DRIVE. NAME /~ a--~-~- Ge) ~ I ~~ \-i ADDRESS 1/3~? ~ ~ Jac Q..~~~- ~~~a ~ << << <, ~~ ~^~ I DO HEREBY REGISTER MY OPPOSITION TO THE GRANTING OF A ZONING VARIANCE THAT WOULD ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A FAST FOOD RESTAURANT AT THE CORNER OF RpUtB 419 AND GLEN HEATHER DRIVE. NAME ADDRESS ,~ ~~ ~ ~~- ~ ' A P P E A R A N C E R E Q U E S T PUBLIC HEARING ON ~~ w I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so that I may comment. I agree to follow the guidelines listed below. WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. 1. Each speaker will have between three and five minutes available whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. 2. Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. 3. All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. 4. Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times . 5. Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. 6. INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. P L E A S E W R I T E L E G I B L Y y _ _t_~ t~ ~,. NAME : Cr a~~ ~ 1 (~ L ~~1 L ~ ~ ~ W:~-, ~ ;~ i • ~ ~ ~ I ~ is I } t ., _, '~ ADDRESS : LL C ~~ `~+ `\~4"4 L kS ' S~ (~2 i ~:. ' 'v ~ r, , .~ ~ PHONE : `1 ~ ~' `I 7 `S PLEASE NOTE: (After filling out, give to the Deputy Clerk. Thank you.) ~~~-~ A P P E A R A N C E R E Q U E S T - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PUBLIC HEARING ON r,:' I would like ttie Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so that I may comment. I agree to follow the guidelines listed below. WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. 1. Each speaker will have between three and five minutes available whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. 2. Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. 3. All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. 4. Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times . 5. Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. 6. INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. P L E A S E W R I T E L E G I B L Y - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ~,- -v NAME : - , - - ,- ADDRESS : r_ "- _~ .- ~ PHONE : " - `~ ' PLEASE NOTE: (After filling out, give to the Deputy Clerk. Thank you.) /~~-~ A P P E A R A N C E R E Q U E S T -----~--- ~ - a-~-----~ ~.~ PUBLIC HEARING ON ~~~.~i'~'~ u~ -~ic-'cam ~.;~1~~'~~~lj 1-~'-L,-l_.c-~'~rt?-cam ,. - l I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so that I may comment. I agree to follow the guidelines listed below. WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. 1. Each speaker will have between three and five minutes available whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. 2. Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. 3. All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. 4. Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times . 5. Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. 6. INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. P L E A S E W R I T E L E G I B L Y - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ~~ ~"1 '~~ NAME : _-~-c-~~~ ~-C ~'~'~-ems',-~ `~ , A DDRES S . ~~~! ~ 1` '~?1 %t~ L ~ .x c~% ~ ~! 1----. /~ ~ , ~% ~~ PHONE : ~''~~ ~, '%' ~ ~ ~ _ C~ ~, ~-~ PLEASE NOTE: (After filling out, give to the Deputy Clerk. Thank you.) i~g-- ~ A P P E A R A N C~ E, R E Q U E S T ~~ PUBLIC HEARING ON ~ ! ,~t~ii`Zfl~l ~G/~~G,~ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so that I may comment. I agree to follow the guidelines listed below. WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. 1. Each speaker will have between three and five minutes available whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. 2. Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. 3. All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. 4. Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times . 5. Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. 6. INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. P L E A S E W R I T E L E G I B L Y - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NAME: ADDRESS : ~ ~~_ O~' / ~~f~/r'~ //~ ~ d L~J~ ~~ ~t~~>, PHONE: ~ L~ '~- - ~--~ PLEASE NOTE: (After filling out, give to the Deputy Clerk. Thank you.) i~s~-~ A P P E A R A N C E R E Q U E S T '~ PUBLIC HEARING ON ; r~/'/ / ~~`~' ~ v' ~~' ~ p~ ~ ~ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so that I may comment. I agree to follow the guidelines listed below. WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. 1. Each speaker will have between three and five minutes available whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. 2. Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. 3. All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. 4. Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times . 5. Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. 6. INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. P L E A S E W R I T E L E G I B L Y - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - l NAME : ~ L `~` 1 ~' " `~- ~ \~ ~ (~~ l~ ~%, ~ ADDRESS : ~ ~ L U ~J [J ; ~~ ~ ~G ;may ~°-, PHONE : ~~ ~' ~' -~ ~ C~ 7` PLEASE NOTE: (After filling out, give to the Deputy Clerk. Thank you.) A P P E A R A N C• E, R E Q U E S T PUBLIC HEARING ON I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to i8 g _a .- recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so that I may comment. I agree to follow the guidelines listed below. WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. 1. Each speaker will have between three and five minutes available whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. 2. Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. 3. All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. 4. Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times . 5. Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. 6. INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. P L E A S E W R I T E L E G I B L Y - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NAME: 1] J ~ jf ADDRESS: ~`~ I PHONE : ~ ~ 4~ ~- ~ .'~ `?~'~-•f PLEASE NOTE: (After filling out, give to the Deputy Clerk. Thank you.) A P P E A R A N C E R E Q U E S T PUBLIC HEARING ON G ~ ~- /~g~~ ~ .~~ ~ / aF I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so that I may comment. I agree to follow the guidelines listed below. WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. 1. Each speaker will have between three and five minutes available whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. 2. Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. 3. All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. 4. Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times . 5. Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. 6. INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. P L E A S E W R I T E L E G I B L Y NAME: `~ ~ ADDRESS : 2?i2~ ('~~TI~~_ ~~`1~- ~(~ Z-n~ a ~ ~ ) /+r ~ 143 PHONE: ~~~ ~ ~~S PLEASE NOTE; (After filling out, give to the Deputy Clerk. Thank you.) /~'~ - z. A P P E A R A N C E R E Q U E S T PUBLIC HEARING ON ~ ~d' ~ ~i' I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so that I may comment. I agree to follow the guidelines listed below. WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. 1. Each speaker will have between three and five minutes available whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. 2. Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. 3. All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. 4. Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times . 5. Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. 6. INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. P L E A S E W R I T E L E G I B L Y - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - r__ ;% 1 ~ NAME : ~_c%~~~ ~ ~~~2- ~- l ~ ~~ __ . r--, ADDRESS : ~L fli`~ ICL' ~ ~~~ ~ ~,j C~l~i::: °~~~% 1 PHONE : ~~`~,-, ~~ - C_. `T> C PLEASE NOTE: (After filling out, give to the Deputy Clerk. Thank you.) A P P E A R A N C E, R E Q U E S T PUBLIC HEARING ON ~~e~ ~d~/ ~~zOGU/~ ~ 88- ~- ~ --~°~-~ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so that I may comment. I agree to follow the guidelines listed below. WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. 1. Each speaker will have between three and five minutes available whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. 2• Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. 3. All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. 4. Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times . 5• Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. 6. INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. P L E A S E W R I T E L E G I B L Y NAME: ADDRESS: PHONE: o ~-, ~ f3o ~~ ~oa PLEASE NOTE: (After filling out, give to the Deputy Clerk. Thank you.) •' , PETITIONER: PETER L. WILLIAMS CASE N[~IBIIt: 50-12/87 Planning Commission Hearing Date: December 1, 1987/January 5, 1988 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: December 15, 1987/January 26, 1988 1. RD~UEST Petition of Peter L. Williams to rezone a 5.08 acre tract from B-2, Business to R-3, Residential to construct multifamily apartments, located at 7655A and 7655B Marson Road within the Hollins Magisterial District. 2. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION No one in opposition was present at the Planning Commission Public Hearing. 3. SIGNIFICANT IMPACT FACTORS a. None. 4. PROFFERED CONDITIONS a. Any proposed multifamily development of the remainder Looney tract will be developed at no greater density than the proposed density for the 4.3 acre tract. b. The existing structure on the Williams tract will not be enlarged. c. The existing structure will be operated as: (1) rental office, (2) apartment for the resident manager of the apartment complex, (3) a community center for the apartments, (4) a day care center. d. The site plan submitted with the petition shall be in substantial conformity with the develognent of the property. 5. COMMISSIONER'S MOTION, VOTE AND REASON Mrs. Flippen moved to approve the petition with proffered conditions. The motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Witt, Gordon, Jones, Flippen, Winstead NAYS: None ABSENT: None 6. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE a. None. 7. ATTACHMENTS Concept Plan (8~" x 11") ~ Vicinity Map (8~" x 11") ~ Staff Report Other: ~ A . Robert Sta zer, Planning Commission Secretary +~ 0 J +~ 0 ~ .:;~ ~_ ~ •r ~ ;ji i~ ~ W = r •~ i :z~ -v ~~ ~r ~ i ~~ ia; c L N ~ I ~--i S` ~ N 4J ~ ~ .n L ~ ~~ t0 O `Y' a O +•~ Cn +~ C ' QJ ~. N U ~- N 2 tC U Q7 C ~ •r (Ci ~--~ ~ .r-fie ~V •'~ ' ~ i °~ es ~~ SQaG Y ~ •. 0 •I-, ~ • ~ ~, ~ ~ O O ~ J O N r- N .~.~ eFe~ 'C7 U O jd~ U C 4J ~i-~ S` O U N r- U N cO O N C •r ~ r- r- +~ •r N N ~ 3 >> U O S- cn C O 3 O ~ ~ O ~ ~ 3 .r .r ~ Q) N L1 i-~ N N N C C >>N ~ ~ ~N~ O O ~ 'r O Q O U C~ ~••~ •r L C ~ > •f-> 4- ~ •r +~ Z7 •r r 5.- 025 O C ~ 4- • r r- > • r L ~ ~ N O C O C •r •r ~ O N != QJ d. O O •r N ~ J 00 ~ N ,C rt Q1 ~ S= ~ E U C 5= O~ r0 U •r U N O ~ O E +~ U ~ N •I-•~ N V1 to 41 •r ~ •r O •r U •r ~ ~ 41 L +~ O +-> O C N~ O C •O U a r- 4- ~ 5.. ~ O J ~ tC Q1N O t0 •r •d ~ N O r• N C ~ N L O O c0 O N r- ~ •r 0J O RS U 07 > U Z acv 3•r-cUS` ~~o 0 3 3 ca N L •F-1 .r. N .r i-> d1 J ~- ~-• ~ r ~ O O N b~ r6 S.. >> +~ (~ O ~ L •r •O C D- U rC5 ~ U S` r ~ ~ X C RS U N QJ r- O 41 N l0 ~--I ~ O N ~- Ur .•--i N M d ~~ E rts •r r r 3 J L f•-+ r-ti a r-~ a--> d N N C a a. n g ~ a~ ~' o N ~~ O ra r• L ~~ C • ~ O ~ ~ r- L!•) O O N Q L «S d '~ O p~oa uos.~ew ~ v sr v O •r L ~ i-~ U •r C rC +~ W \ N V1 +-~ •r O •r .C i C +~ U ~ +-> \ M ~ N i-~ ~ ~ •r r+ a~ ~ d.~ O N r I~ U 41 i > ~D U O ~--i cC ~ ~ r--1 N O ~ N O +-~ 4- +~ • r O N N C a--~ 5-. 'C3 (~ U i Q ~ ~ M d' ~ ~ •~ ~ (~~p N IU i] s.. ; •U U 0 ~o Q 0 y_ L N O U N 0 ~ c ~ L.c~ Q Y U' ~~' a~ S.. a `~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ U N i ~~ ~ ~ U~ ~ Q m ~~' - 2 - !~`_-'- ISTERHOUGT, FERGU5GN NATT, AHER~N & AGEE ATTGRNEYS-AT-LAW RGAN~KE, VIRGINIA 24016-1699 VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY_SUPERVISORS OF_ROANOKE COUNTY IN RE: ) A 5.08 acre parcel of land, ) generally located at 7655A and 76556 ) Marson Road, within the Hollins ) Magisterial District, and recorded as ) Parcel #27.11-I-(20 8 21), in the ) Roanoke County Tax Records ) RECOMMENDATION -------------- TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY: WHEREAS, your Petitioner, Peter Williams, has filed with the Secretary to the Planning Commission a petition to rezone the above-referenced parcel of land from B-2, General Commercial District to R-3, Multi-Family Residential District for the purpose of the construction of a multi-family garden apartments. WHEREAS, the petition was referred to the Planning Commission which, after due legal notice as required by Section 15.1-431 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended, did hold a public hearing on January 5, 1988; and WHEREAS, at that public hearing all parties in interest were afforded an opportunity to be heard; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due consideration has recommended to the Board of County Supervisors that the rezoning be granted. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission recommends to the Board of County Supervisors that the above-referenced parcel of land be rezoned to R-3, /8~ -.~ Multi-Family Residential District, subject to the preferred conditions. The above action was adopted on motion of Ms. Flippen, and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: Ms. Flippen, Mr. Gordon, Mr. Witt, Mr. Winstead, and Mr. Jones STERHOUGT, FERGLISON IATT, AHERGN & AGEE ATTGRNEYS-AT-LAW ROANGKE, VIRGINIA Z4G1G-1699 II r1.e14c.c 2 /~8 - ~ VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY IN RE: ) FINAL ORDER ----- ----- 5.08 acre parcel of land, ) generally located at 7655A and 76558 ) Marson Road, within the Hollins ) Magisterial District, and recorded as ) Parcel #27.11-1-(20 ~ 21), in the Roanoke) County Tax Records ) TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY: WHEREAS, your Petitioner, Peter Williams, did :~ _! f` petition the Board of County Supervisors to rezone the above-referenced parcel of land from B-2, General Commercial District to R-3, Multi-Family Residential District, for the purpose of the construction of a multi-family garden apartments. WHEREAS, after due legal notice, the Planriing Commission did hold a public hearing of the petition on January 5, 1988, at which time, all parties in interest were given an opportunity to be heard; and WHEREAS, after full consideration, the Board of County Supervisors determined that the rezoning be approved with the-proffered conditions. 1/26/88 NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDERED that the isTERHOUOr, FERGLISON a forement i oned pa rce I o f I and, which i s contained i n the VATT, AHERON & AGEE ATTORNEYS-AT-LAW ROANOKE, VIRGINIA Roanoke County Tax Maps as Parce I and I ega I I y described zaoie-lase below, be rezoned from B-2, General Commercial District to R-3, Multi-Family Residential District. i~ A 5.08 acre parcel of land generally located at 7655A and 7655B Marson Road, within the Hollins Magisterial District, and recorded as Parcel #27.11-I-(20 S 21), in the Roanoke County Tax Records with the following conditions: (1) That any proposed multi-family development of the remainder "Looney" tract (the portion not acquired by Peter Williams) will be developed at no greater a density than the proposed density of the apartments of Mr. Williams. (2) That the existing structure will not be enlarged. (3) The existing structure on the Williams tract will be operated as: (a) a rental office for the apartments; (b) apartment for the resident manager of the apartment complex; (c) a community center for the apartments; and (d) a day care center. ISTERHGLIGT, FERGIJSGN NATT, AHERGN & AGEE ATTGRNEYS-AT-LAW RGANGKE, VIRGINIA 24018-1699 (4) That the site plan prepared by Richard A. Gregory S Associates, Inc., and submitted with the Petition shall be substantially conformed with in the development of the property. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this order be transmitted to the Secretary of the Planning Commission 2 /88-3 and that he be directed to reflect that change on the Official Zoning Map of Roanoke County. ADOPTED on motion of Supervisor Bob L. Johnson seconded by Supervisor Richard W _ Robers~ and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Garrett, Johnson, McGraw, Nickens, Robers NAYES: ABSENT: Jam' - Deputy Clerk, Roanoke County Board of Supervisors r1.e14d.c cc: Real Estate Assessor Development Review Coordinator Director of Planning ISTERHOUOT, FERGUSON MATT, AHERUN & AGEE ATTORNEYS-AT-LAW R~ANOKE, VIRGINIA 24~1G-1699 3 ~P8- 3 OSTERHDUDT, FERGUSON NATT, AHERON & AGEE ATTO R N EYS-AT-LAW ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-1b99 VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE BOARD OF _COUNTY_SUPERVISORS OF_ROANOKE_COUNTY IN RE: ) A 5.08 acre parcel of land, ) AMENDED generally located at 7655A and 7655B ) PROFFER OF ~Jlarson Road, within the Hollins ) CONDITIONS Magisterial District, and recorded as ) Parcel # _ __, in the Roanoke ) County Tax Records ) TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY: Being in accord with Sec. 15.1-491.1 et seq. of the Code of Virginia and Sec. 21-105 of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance, the Petitioner, Peter Williams, hereby voluntarily proffers to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, the following conditions to the rezoning of the above-referenced parcel of land. (1) That the existing structure on the "Williams" tract will be demolished prior to or at completion of the 3 buildings on the west side of the driveway. The existing structure on the Looney tract will be demolished prior to or at completion of the units on the east side of the driveway. (2) That the site plan prepared by Richard A. Gregory 6 Associates, Inc., and submitted with the Petition shall be substantially conformed with in the development of the property with the provisions that upon demolition of the existing structures, two additional buildings, each containing 12 units, may be constructed. The additional building on each side of the driveway may be constructed upon completion of the aforesaid demolition. Respectfully submitted, Peter Williams By_ ~~ G L~ ---- Of Counsel Edward A. Natt, Esquire Osterhoudt, Ferguson, Natt, Aheron s Agee, P.C. 1919 Electric Road, S.W. Roanoke, VA 24018 Counsel for Petitioner r1.e14b.c OSTERHOUDT, FERGUS01 NATT, AHERDN & AGEE ATTORNEYS-AT-LAW ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-1699 2 QSTERNOUOT, FERGUSO MATT, AHERON 6 AGEI ATTORNEYS-AT-LAW ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-1699 LEGAL NOTICE Notice is hereby given to all interested persons that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, will hold a public hearing at 7:00 p.m•, at the Roanoke County Administrative Center, at 3738 Brambleton Avenue, Roanoke, Virginia, on January 26, 1988, on the petition of Peter Williams to rezone with certain conditions a 5.08 acre parcel of land, located in the Hollins Magisterial District, to in Roanoke County, from B-2, General Commercial District, zoning district R-3, Multi-Family District, pursuant to the provisions of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance, said parcel of land being more particularly described as follows: A 5.08 acre parcel of land, generally located at 7655A and 76558 Marson Road, within the Hollins Magisterial District, and record nokesCountylTax7Records20 6 21), in the Roa A copy of the Zoning Ordinance of Roanoke County and amendments thereto as well as a copy of the petition, site plan, and other documents related to this request may be examined in the office of the Department of Development, located in Room 600 at Roanoke County Administrative Center, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, Roanoke, Virginia. Roanoke County will provide assistance to handicapped persons desiring to attend public hearings. a Such individuals are requested to contact the County office of Personnel Services (703) 772-2018) if special provisions are necessary for attendance. (o i~h d a o f ~ /~ L,C C~J1.4~ Given under my hand this ____ y ___ UU 198 _P of Roanoke County ~:~i1Cti~ ~'~ ''.,~ ------------------ Please publish in the evening edi;Zon1988 heandaTuesdaymes- World News on Tuesday, January ~ ublication to January ^19, 1988• Please bill cost of the p P.C., 1919 Osterhoudt, Ferguson, Natt, Aheron 8 Agee, Electric Road, S.W., Roanoke, Virginia 24018. ~STERHUUUT, FERGUSU MATT, ANERUN 8 AGE pTTURNEYS-AT-LAW RUANUKE, VIRGINIA 24U1G-1fi99 2 Page 1 of 2 VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY A 5.08 acre parcel of land, ) generally located ) at 7655 MARSON ROAD ) PETITION within the HOLLINS ) Magisterial District, and ) recorded as parcel # ) in the Roanoke County Tax Records.) TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY: WHEREAS, your Petitioner r T respectfully files this petition pursuant to Section 21-105 of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance and in accordance with the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended, and would respectfully show the following: 1) The Petitioner is the owner of the above-referenced parcel of land. 2) The property is presently zoned under the provisions of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance as B2 District. 3) The property is designated in the Future Land Use Guide of the Roanoke County Comprehensive Development Plan. 4) Your Petitioner now desires to have this property rezoned as R3 District for the purpose of MULTI FAMILY APAR'TME'NTS Page 2 of 2 WHEREFORE, your Petitioner respectfully requests that the Zoning Ordinance of Roanoke County be amended and that the above-referenced parcel of land be rezoned as set out in number 4. FURTHER, your Petitioner requests that this petition be referred by the Secretary to the Roanoke County Planning Commission for its consideration and recommendation. Respectfully submitted, Petitioner Hollins District Merchants and Retailers Williamson Road Roanoke. 24019. Jan 22nd 1988 Mr Bob Johnson The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors 3738 Brambleton Avenue. Roanoke, Va. 24015. . Dear Mr Johnson: 6Ve are businessmen in the Hollins district who have talked with Mr Williams and reviewed his plan to develop HIGHGATE apartments on Marson Rd. We feel that this will be an asset to both our business and industrial community in that it will provide needed our customers, students and employees whoscommuteninltheuHollinsrcorridor. The excellent site location can have no negative impact on future business development fronting on Williamson Road. At the same time it will serve to complement the proposed develo the property adjacent to Mr Williams which was announced torgonforwa doas a permitted use. We would like to join with the Board of Supervisors and the Planning Commission in support of this project and welcome Mr Williams as a valuable resource as a property developer in our community. TEXACO - MpTORIST PARADISE/ y `~ l ~ ~--- .~! ~_ C~ ~/~/~ VALLEY CLEANERS f ~° " C HO/LLINS BARBERSHOP ." ~ ` ~ -~ ~, ACE AUK (~~- - A~'~"`~ ' _`~'/6/ SUNNYBROOK HOLLINS HARDWARE. CROUCH'S PHARMACY ~ J MOORES ILD PPLY cc:Ed at i sg - .~ `f ~ieL'ta.¢cL dt• Lowy, a¢. ovt•~• 401 C~alLEn9E~ df~E. ~oanoL'ZE, ~1¢9inia 24012 _~ i ~, ~~. ~ ~ ~- ha~~ -f-a.ll~ t ~ r-z. ~ y-yl ~ 7i`~ .~ i ~~ ~.. c~ ~ - ~ ~, .~a Y .~---~k ~- ~ 1 ~ tic. ~ t.<.;> s l --- f - i°~ 'r. ~~ J E ~' "~'" ~ ~, yam. ~ i ~ ~ r'~ U~ G:L. La..~ _., ., 6J VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE BOARD OF_COUNTY_SUPERVISORS OF_ROANOKE_COUNTY IN RE: ) A 5.08 acre parcel of land, ) AMENDED generally located at 7655A and 76556 ) PROFFER OF Marson Road, within the Hollins ) CONDITIONS Magisterial District, and recorded as ) Parcel # _ __, in the Roanoke ) County Tax Records ) TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY: Being i n accord with Sec. 15. I -491. I et seq. of the Code of Virginia and Sec. 21-105 of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance, the Petitioner, Peter Williams, hereby voluntarily proffers to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, the following conditions to the rezoning of the above-referenced parcel of land. (1) That the existing structure on the "Williams" OSTERHGUOT, FERGUSGN NATT, AHERGN & AGES ATTORNEYS-AT-LAN ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 2401E-1b99 tract will be demolished prior to or at completion of the 3 buildings on the west side of the driveway. The existing structure on the Looney tract will be demolished prior to or at completion of the units on the east side of the driveway. (2) That the site plan prepared by Richard A. Gregory 6 Associates, Inc., and submitted with the Petition shall be substantially conformed with in the development of the property with the provisions that upon demolition of the existing structures, two additional buildings, each containing 12 units, may be constructed. The additional building on each side of the driveway may be constructed upon completion of the aforesaid demolition. Respectfully submitted, Peter Williams By- ~~~a~a~D Q L1~' ____ Of Counsel Edward A. Natt, Esquire Osterhoudt, Ferguson, Natt, Aheron ~ Agee, P.C. 1919 Electric Road, S.W. Roanoke, VA 24018 Counsel for Petitioner r1.e14b.c 08TERHOUOT, FERGUSGN MATT, AHERGN & AGEE ATT 0 R N EY S-AT-LA'N ROANGKE, VIRGINIA 24018-1699 2 r • ~ PETITIONER: DAMS H. ELLIOT COMPANY, INC. / g 8 l~( CASE N[~4BER: 5-1/88 Planning Commission Hearing Date: January 5, 1988 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: January 26, 1988 1. REQUEST Petition of Davis H. Elliot Company, Inc. to amend conditions and to rezone a 9.33 acre tract fran M-l, Industrial to M-2, Industrial to construct an office and contractors' yard, located on the southeast side of Route 460 approximately 400 feet northeast of the border of the City of Roanoke and the County of Roanoke in the Hollins Magisterial District. 2. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION No one in opposition was present at the Planning Carmission Public Hearing. 3. SIGNIFICANT IMPACT FACTORS a. Comprehensive Plan: 1985 Comprehensive Development Plan has placed this area within a Development land use category. The Development land use category encourages residential development consisting of conventional, cluster, zero lot line, attached and detached residential units. General industrial uses are not permitted activities. Petitioner's request for a general industrial zoning is not consistent with the current land use plan designation. Current request should be evaluated in context of previous petition that proposed the development of a light industrial park. b. Fire Protection: Area is outside of recc~nmended travel time standard. c. Rescue: Area is outside of recommended travel time standard. 4. PROFFERED CONDITIONS a. Per attached. 5. CONIl~2ISSIONER'S MOTION, VOTE AND REASON Mrs. Flippen moved to deny the petition with proffered conditions. The motion did not carry with the following roll call vote: AYES: Flippen NAYS: Witt, Gordon, Jones, Winstead ABSENT: None 6. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE a. Mrs. Flippen contends there is a potential danger to the aquifer and well systems especially with the addition of a waste oil tank. 7. ATTACHN4ENTS ,/ Concept Plan (8~" x 11") ,/ Vicinity Map (8~" x 11") ~ Staff Report Other: ~~ Robert Sta zer, Planning Commission Secretary N r 0 4 ~ FtQ ~ i u o~ u i n u x ~ ; o o ~ s ^ x a a u 0 ~z ~, _ W ~w 'Z I a cn a _~ Qo Dv ~88-y a . ,2R ~ O / `tom , ,`,~ ~w = . o~ • ~ `~ ~ ~ ~\\ 4-,P~ ~ 9 , O •\~ '~ \/ '~ l ~ .,\ 4ti r _ ' •. ~`' .s ~ mun.uc..w. -,; r // a ~~~Qr.`~r ~` . ~4 / ~ J4i ~ N" 19/G j :rr.•. (fit; i, :,: •l ~~ VICINITY Nigp D NnRru ROANOKE COUNTY ~ - 2 - Davis H. Elliot Co, Inc. DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT M-1 to M-2 - --- - ,., } STAFF REPORT CASE NUMBER: 5-1/88 PETITIONER: DAVIS H. ELLIOT COMPANY REVIEWED BY: ROB STALZER ~S DATE: DECEMBER 31, 1987 Petition of Davis H. Elliot Company, Inc. to amend conditions and to rezone a 9.33 acre tract from M-1, Industrial to M-2, Industrial to con- struct an office and contractors' yard,~located on the southeast side of Route 460 approximately 400 feet northeast of the border of the City of Roanoke and the County of Roanoke in the Hollins Magisterial District. 1. NATURE OF REQUEST a. Conditional request to construct and operate a utility contracting office and equipment storage area and facilities. Request focuses on the rear portion of a 14.29 acre tract that was rezoned in February 1987 to develop a light industrial park. Development previously proposed for the 4.96 acre portion fronting US 460 will be constructed according to original concept. Current proposal will allow one industry on rear 9.33 acres. Previous concept proposed several industries which would have been situated in an industrial park. b. Attached concept plan and zoning vicinity map describe proposal more fully. 2. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS a. Petitioner is offering numerous conditions that apply to the use and design of the property to be rezoned to M-2. These conditions pertain primarily to specific activities, building improvements, setback, building .materials, open space and landscaping, parking, storage, signage, fuel storage tanks, underground utility services, and accessory uses. These conditions are described in detail and are attached. Note that conditions applying to M-2 uses allow all uses permitted in the M-1 Light Industrial District except commercial kennels with exterior runs and yards and flea markets. Previous conditions. disallowed these uses as well as automobile repair, overhauling or service requiring outside storage of disabled vehicles, and mini warehouses. b. Site plan review will be required to insure compliance with County regulations. c. Additional VDOT entrance permit not required. 3. SITE CHARACTERISTICS a. Topography: Knoll on front of property screens much of parcel from view of travelers on US Route 460. Property slopes gently away from US 460 toward Glade Creek. b. Ground Cover: Grass and gravel. 4. AREA CHARACTERISTICS a. Future Growth Priority: Situated within the Bonsack Community Planning Area; designated as a high growth area. At the present time, partially served by urban services. -3- /`~~ -- ,~ b. General area is primarily large lot residential with some subdivision activity towards Botetourt County. US Route '460, a major arterial, divides this section of the county. 5. LAND USE IMPACT ASSESSMENT Rating: Rate each factor according to the impact of the proposed action. Use a scale of 1 through 5. 1 = positive impact, 2 =negligible impact, 3 = manageable impact, 4 = disruptive impact, 5 = severe impact, and N/A = not applicable. RATING FACTOR COMMENTS LAND USE COMPATIBILITY 4 a. Comprehensive Plan: 1985 Comprehensive Development Plan has placed this area within a Development land use category. (1) The Development land use category encourages residential development consisting of conventional, cluster, zero lot line, attached and detached residential units. General industrial uses are not permitted activities. Petitioner's request for a general industrial zoning is not consistent with the current land use plan designation. Current request should be evaluated in context of previous petition that proposed the development of a light industrial park. 3 b. Surrounding Land: Topography acts as an effective screen. Property is visible from fewer than 20 homes. Frontage development proposed in February 1987 will not be changed. 2 c. Neighboring Area: US Route 460 corridor with abutting detached dwelling units located along highway. Subdivision activity initiated towards Botetourt County line. 3 d. Site Layout: No change to design of frontage properties. Rear portion internal circulation will not allow for access to adjoining properties. 2 e. Architecture: Building height not to exceed 30 feet. Building sizes on portion to be rezoned will not be constructed at a residential scale. Building facades visible from US 460 will not be faced with brick or equivalent materials as proposed previously. 2 2 2 3 f. Screening and Landscape: As per ordinance. g. Amenities: Adequate parking indicated. No change to frontage development. h. Natural Features: No negative impact. TRAFFIC i. Street Capacities: US Route 460 has a capacity of 40,000 ADT with a current volume of 17,000 ADT. Entrance and turn tapers proposed previously will not be changed. Traffic from proposed use will not exceed traffic from previously proposed industrial park. Type of traffic, however, will be more industrial in nature. -4- 3 j. ~' G~.r~_ulation: Access to rear portion of property will note changed. Access potential to adjoining properties will be eliminated. UTILITIES 3 k. Water: The proposed Route 460-Vinton water line (16 inches in diameter) is scheduled to be completed by January 1988. There is an existing well on the site if water needs occur prior to water line installation. 2 1. Sewer: Adequate lines and treatment plant. DRAINAGE 3 m. Basin: 2 n. Floodplain: 4 4 PUBLIC SERVICES o. Fire Protection: Area is outside of recommended travel time standard. P• N/A q. N/A r. Rescue: Area is outside of recommended travel time standard. Parks and Recreation: School: 1 TAX BASE s. - Land and Improvement Value: $950,000 - Taxable Gross Sales/Year: $3.5' million - Total Employees: 135 - Total revenue to the County/Year: Approximately $45,925 ENVIRONMENT 2 t. Air: See conditions. ? u. Water: See conditions with respect to groundwater protection. 2 v. Soils: 2 w. Noise: See conditions. 2 x. Signage: See conditions. Petitioner proposed standards that are more stringent than sign ordinance. 6. PLAN CONSISTENCY The property considered for rezoning is designated as Development. The proposed M-2 General Commercial area is not consistent with either the land use policies or map. 7. STAFF EVALUATION a. Strengths: (1) Conditions as proffered are very adequate. (2) Positive effect on tax base. (3) No change to more visible frontage portion of property. (4) No additional negative effect on circulation or traffic. b. Weaknesses: (1) Emergency services delivery will be substandard. (2) Proposed industrial uses not consistent with future land use map designation or policies. (3) Proposed use and conditions will permit a more intensive type of industrial activity than that petitioned for in February 1987. -5- ' ' ~t n'~,j ~ 1. l,i /~ ~~ ~ ~9 ~ ~ ~ VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY A 9.331± acre parcel of land, ) generally located R ar ) g~rF?agP - PPrimr~tPr Fact ) Commerce Center within the Hollins ) Magisterial District, and ) recorded as parcel # 50.01-1-2 ) in the Roanoke County Tax Records.) x. ~~ PETITION TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY: WHEREAS, your Petitioner Davis H Elliot Co Inc respectfully files this petition pursuant to Section 21-105 of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance and in accordance with the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended, and would respectfully show the following: 1) The Petitioner is the owner of the above-referenced parcel of land. 2) The property is presently zoned under the provisions of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance as M-1 Light Industrial District. 3) The property is designated Transitional - Amended in the Future Land Use Guide of the Roanoke County Comprehensive Development Plan. 4) Your Petitioner now desires to have this property rezoned as M-2 General industrial speciric to Section 21-24-2 Para. A (1) and 18) - District for the purpose of Contractors yaxd. Page 2 of 2 WHEREFORE, your Petitioner respectfully requests that the Zoning Ordinance of Roanoke County be amended and that the above-referenced parcel of land be rezoned as set out in number 4. FURTHER, your Petitioner requests that this petition be referred by the Secretary to the Roanoke County Planning Commission for its consideration and recommendation. Respectfully submitted, DAVIS H. ELLIOT CO., INC. Petitioner BY: William D. Elliot, President VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY A 9.331± _ acre parcel of land, ) generally located rear acreage ) Perimeter East Commerce Center ) within the Hollins ) Magisterial District, and ) recorded as parcel #50.01-1-2 ) in the Roanoke County Tax Records.) Page 1 of 2 RECOMMENDATION TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY: WHEREAS, your Petitioner Davis H. Elliot Co.. Inc. has filed with the Secretary to the Planning Commission a petition to rezone the above-referenced parcel of land from M-1 Light Industrial N-2 General Industrial soecific District to to Section 21-24-2 Paragraph A District for the purpose of (1) and (8) - Contractors yard. WHEREAS, the petition was referred to the Planning Commission which, after due legal notice as required by Section 15.1-431 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended, did hold a public hearing on January 5 , 19 g ~; and WHEREAS, at that public hearing all parties in interest were afforded an opportunity to be heard; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due consideration has recommended to the Board of County Supervisors that the rezoning be approved with proffered conditions Page 2 of 2 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission recommends to the Board of County Supervisors that the above- referenced parcel of land be rezoned to M-2 , Industrial with proffered conditions ~ District. The above action was adopted on motion of ('ar,,,,,~,~1~ FtiTTpg. #.o den,. on second by and upon the following recorded vote: AYES : F1 i ppen NAYS: Witt, Gordon, Jones, !!instead ABSENT: None Respectfully submitted, ~'V ~J~ Secreta y Roanoke County Planning Commission L E G A L N O T I C E Notice is hereby given to all interested persons that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at their evening session beginning at 7:00 p.m. on Tuesday, 26, 1988, in the Community Room at the Roanoke County Administration Center, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, S.W., Roanoke, Virginia, on the petition of Davis H. Elliot Company, Inc., requesting rezoning from M-1 Industrial to M-2 Industrial of a tract containing 9.33 acres and located on the southeast side of Route 460, approximately 400 feet northeast of the border of the City of Roanoke and the County of Roanoke in the Hollins Magisterial District. Rezoning has been requested to construct an office and contractor's yard. The County Planning Commission recommends approval with proffered conditions. A copy of the Zoning Ordinance of Roanoke County and amendments thereto as well as a copy of the petition, site plan, and other documents related to this request may be examined in the office of the Department of Development, located in Room 600 at the Roanoke County Administration Center. Roanoke County will provide assistance to handicapped persons desiring to attend public hearings. Such individuals are requested to contact the County office of Personnel Services ([703] 772-2018) if special provisions are necessary for attendance. Given under my hand this 6th day of January 1988. .N - Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Please publish in the evening edition of the Roanoke Times and World News on: Tuesday, January 12, 1988 Tuesday, January 19, 1988 Direct the bill for Publication to: Steve Waldrup 500 East Fourth Street Salem, Virginia 24153 ~~8 _ y A P P E A R A N C E R E Q U E S T ~~/ PUBLIC HEARING ON ~,,'dy i 5 }~ ~ //i o~t ~'~~ --~-~c_ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so that I may comment. I agree to follow the guidelines listed below. WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILD GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. 1. Each speaker will have between three and five minutes available whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. 2. Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. 3. All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. 4. Both speakers and the audience will. exercise courtesy a~ aii times. 5. Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. 6. INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. P L E A S E W R I T E L E G I B L Y - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NAME : ~ - n ti a ~~" ~~ . L. a c..J ~ .~ -~"' ADDRESS : '~ D / '1 _~~ d /~£ K ~ s / /"C ~~ ]~ C cl. Via ~~.. y ~.. ~ y ~ ~ PHONE : ~ 'j~ .Z~- S C' ~ 3 PLEASE NOTE: (After filling out, give to the Deputy Clerk. Thank you.) . , ~ ~ ~ _ ~~ A P P E A R A N C E R E Q U E S T ~~ ---------- -- ---- a PUBLIC HEARING ON -~~,~ ~ J ~--\ ~., L,~ ~ ~~ ro I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so that I may comment. I agree to follow the guidelines listed below. WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. 1. Each speaker will have between three and five minutes available whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. 2. Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. 3. All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. 4. Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times . 5. Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. 6. INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. P L E A S E W R I T E L E G I B L Y - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NAME : ~ ~ ~' v e ~~ ~~~~.c, ADDRESS : ~~(a ~, r u~ti~'.~,.>,~ ~~ PHONE : ,~'1 G~ -- C.? i ~ ) PLEASE NOTE: (After filling out, give to the Deputy Clerk. Thank you.) A P P E A R A N C E R E Q U E S T - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PUBLIC HEARING ON I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to ~~ ~ • ~~ h . ~-,~ ek ,,~ `` '~ ;fit recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so that I may comment. I agree to follow the guidelines listed below. WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Each speaker will have between three and five minutes available whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times . Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. 6. INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. P L E A S E W R I T E L E G I B L Y .~-.... NAME : ~. ~.. ~" ~. ADDRESS: ~. PHONE : ~ ``' ~~~' ~•` .-.. :w X88- ~- PLEASE NOTE: (After filling out, give to the Deputy Clerk. Thank you.) VIRGINIA: Page 1 of 2 BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY A 9.331± acre parcel of land, ) generally located rear acreage ) Perimeter East Commerce Center ) within the Hollins ) FINAL ORDER Magisterial District, and ) recorded as parcel # 50.01-1-2 ) in the Roanoke County Tax Records.) TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY: WHEREAS, your Petitioner Davis N_ Rlli~t Cc~_~ inr did petition the Board of County Supervisors to rezone the above- ~~°„ referenced parcel of land from M-1 Light Industrial ~ M-2 General Industrial specific ~ District to to Section 21-24-2 Paragra h A District for the purpose ~ and 8 - Contractors yard. of WHEREAS, .after due legal notice, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing of the petition onJanuary ~, 1988 at which time, all parties in interest were given an opportunity to be heard; and WHEREAS, after full consideration, the Board of County Supervisors determined that the rezoning be approved with the proffered conditions 1/26/88. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDERED that the aforementioned parcel of land, which is contained in the Roanoke County Tax Maps as Parcel 50.01-1-land recorded in Deed Book 1259, PG 1702 and legally described below, be rezoned from M-1 Light Indus~,rial District to _M-2 General Tndu.tr;a1 District. -6- ~Sg- L~ Page 2 of 2 Legal Description of Property: SEE ATTACHED PAGES 7A & 7B BE IT FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this order be transmitted to the Secretary of the Planning Commission and that he be directed to reflect that change on the official zoning map of Roanoke County. ADOPTED on motion of Supervisor McGraw, seconded by~pervi~or Nickens and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supevisors Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Robers NAYS: Supevisor Johnson ABSENT: `~ . Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: Real Estate Assessor Development Review Coordinator Director of Planning -7- T. P .PARKER & SON /~ - Engineers and Surveyors, Ltd. TELEPHOIGE 816 BOULEVARD 387-1153 TULLY P. PARKER. P.E. & L.S. SALEM, VIRGINIA AREA CODE JOHN T. PARKER. P.E. & L.S. 241 53 703 FRANK B. CALDWELL, III, P.E. & L.S. P.O. BOX 39 12 January 1988 Description of 9.331 acre parcel being the remaining property of Jack F. Walrond, Jr. Perimeter East Commerce Center Roanoke County, Virginia Starting at a point in the southerly right-of-way of U.S. Route 460 and being shown as Corner No. 1 on Subdivision of Perimeter East Commerce Center, Phase I (Plat Book 10, Page 113); thence leaving the right-of-way of U.S. Route 460 and with the property of Nancy G. Creasey, et als (Will Book 386, Page 729), S. 65° 44' 53" E. 257.76 feet to the Point of BEGINNING; thence leaving the Creasey property and with the southerly line of Lot 3 of Perimeter East Commerce Center, N. 38° 21' 11" E. 224.01 feet to a point in the westerly line of Lot 2; thence leaving Lot 3 and with the line of Lot 2, S. 51° 38' 49" E. 36.50 feet to a point; thence still with Lot 2, N. 38° 21' 11" E. 300.00 feet to a point in the westerly line of a 50 foot right-of-way; thence leaving Lot 2 and with the right-of-way of a cul-de-sac whose radius is 50.00 feet, whose arc is 261.80 feet and whose chord is N. 38° 21' 11" E. 50.00 feet to a point in the easterly right-of-way; thence with said right-of-way, N. 51° 38' 49" W. 36.50 feet to a point; thence leaving said right-of-way and with the southerly line of Lot 1, N. 38° 21' 11" E. 204.93 feet to a point; thence leaving Lot 1 and with the Virginia H. Davis - 7A - ~...~ i8~;' ~ y Description of 9.331 acre parcel being the remaining property of Jack F. Walrond, Jr. Perimeter East Commerce Center Roanoke County, Virginia property (Deed Book 639, Page 125), S. 38° 17' 08" E. 227.05 feet to a point; thence continuing with said Davis property, N. 79° 42' 48" E. 135.67 feet to a point; thence leaving said Davis property and with the property of Dr. Richard H. Gowe, Jr. (Deed Book 1105, Page 512), S. 1° 55' 48" E. 756.43 feet to a point; thence continuing with the Lowe property, S. 71° 38' 05" W. 202.63 feet to a point; thence leaving the Lowe property and with the property of Nancy G. Creasey, et als, N. 21° 11' 35" W. 125.91 feet to a point; thence continuing with said Creasey property, N. 65° 44' 53" W. 598.08 feet to the Point of BEGINNING and containing 9.331 acres and being all the remaining property of Jack F. Walrond, Jr. (Deed Book 1259, Page 1702) as shown on Subdivision of Perimeter East Commerce Center, Phase I as prepared by T. P. Parker & Son, Engineers and Surveyors, Ltd. dated 23 October 1987 and recorded in Plat Book 10, Page 113. -7B- VIRGINIA: ~~8-'~ BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY A 9.331± acre parcel of land, ) generally located rear acreage ) Perimeter East ) CommPrcP n Pr ) within the Hollins ) Magisterial District, and ) recorded as parcel # 50.01-1-2 ) in the Roanoke County Tax Records. ) PROFFER OF CONDITIONS TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY: Being in accord with Sec. 15.1-491.1 et seq. of the Code of Virginia and Sec. 21-105E. of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance, the Petitioner Davis H. Elliot Co.. Inc. hereby voluntarily proffers to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia the following conditions to the rezoning of the above-referenced parcel of land: SEE ATTACHED PROFFER OF CONDITIONS. ~ rne.NpED ~/F f K~. -8- 1- ~- kk AmGN~ ~D / yj j,~ ~ I / PROFFER OF CONDITIONS r v V "7f }'1- Z y'b2T, o,J o~f'v (1 ) I,a.rt.h berms on west - 460 fron/tags property line shall be retained in an approximate size of 4 feet in height. Earth berm on east - rear property line to be retained in are approximate size of 4 feet ire height. Earth berms are to be seeded and/or covered with plaz;t materials. (2) Subdivision restrictions for Perimeter East Commerce Center, which were proffered, shall rye amended to apply to the M-2 users, specific to Section 21-24-2 Paragraph A (1) and (8) and development of the rear acreage specific to one user. The subsections amended are: Parking, Landscaping, Fuel Storage, Use Limitations, Building Facades and Signs. The amendments specifically address a change from a M-1 to M-2 zoning. (3) Proffer #9 and #10 of the Rezoning shall be amended, specific to current site development. (4) Future road right-of-ways set forth on Subdivision Plat Perimeter East Commerce Center, dated October 2, 1987, and recorded in Plat Book. 10, Page 113, is to be deleted. (5) [n'aste oil tank (maximum 1,000 gallons) shall be o.f buff hide construction with dry well monitoring. (6) Vehicle maintenance shop shall be for the sole use of Davis H. Elliot Co., Inc. vehicles. (7) M-2 use shall further exclude the uses as set forth under Section 21-24-1 of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance updated August 4, 1986, mini warehouses. Respectfully submitted, DAVIS H. ELLIOT CO., INC. Petitioner BY: /~ ~ ~ / ~ ~ William D. Elliot, President -9- ' ~ PROPOSED RESTRICTIONS ,Q PERIMETER-EAST COMMERCE PARK ~v ~ "" '~ It is the intent of the rCStrict~.ons as applied to the B-2 General Commercial District and M-2 General Industrial District to encourage the use of land:;cape screening, buffered parking areas and signage, such as to produce an attractive commercial district and working environ. All of said tracts of land shown on the development map of Perimeter East Commerce Park shall be subject to the covenants, conditions and restrictions as follows: PERI'ORMANCE STANDARDS No obnoxious or offensive trade or activity shall be carried on nor shall anything be done thereon which may be or become an annoyance to any person or entity owning property within Perimeter-East Commerce Park or adjacent to said Park, by reason of excessive emissions of smoke, odors, dust, nongaseous fumes, excessive noise, or excessive glare or heat. It is the intent of the performance standards, as set forth, to provide that commercial and light industrial properties shall be developed and maintained with proper appearance from streets and adjoining properties and to provide that each such permitted use shall be a good neighbor to adjoining properties. The recipient of a building permit within the Commerce Park should note that these performance standards, like other provisions, are continuing obligations and the property is expected to operate in compliance with these standards. A. Smoke - Measurements shall be at the point of emissions. Emissions shall not exceed a 20~ opacity, as determined by monitoring by standards of the Virginia Air Pollution Control Board. - 10 - .~. / _ B. Dust - Reasonable prccau•L-ions shall be maintained to prevent particulate materiaJ_ from becoming air borne. The U1eCat1'L'IOnS may include, but %1 .[.cam not limited to standards as set forth under the Regulations for the controlling of air pollution, Section 120-04-0104 of the Virginia Air Pollution •.~. . Control Board (January 1, 1985). _ C. Odor - No owner or other persons shall cause or permit to be discharged into the atmosphere from any affected facility any emission which cause zn odor objectionable to individuals of ordinary sensibility. D . Gases - Fumes or gases shall not be emitted at any point in concentrations or amounts that are obnoxious to individuals of ordinary sensibility, or are toxic or corrosive. E. Noise - Noise shall be measured on any property line of the tract on which the operation is located. Noise shall be muffled so as not to become objectionable due to intermittence, beat frequency, shrillness or intensity. At the property line, the sound pressure level of noise radiated continuously from a facility shall not exceed the values given in Tables 2 and 3 in any octave band frequency. TAL' JOE 2 Maximum permissible sound-pressure levels at specified points of measurement for noise radiated continuously from a facility. Frequency Band Cycles Per Second 20 - 75 - 150 - 300 - 600 - 1,200 - 2,400 - 9,800 - 10,000 - 20,000 - 30,000 - 40,000 - 75 ................... 150 ................... 300 ................... . 600 ................... 1,200 ................... 2,400 ................... 4,800.. ............... 10,000 ................... 20,000 ................... 30,000 ................... 40,000 ................... 50,000 ................... Decibel*Level 69 54 47 41 37 34 31 28 26) 25) (to avoid possible 24) intezference with 23) animal experiments) - 11 - -~ ~.. Q *According to the following formula: ~G7 ~'~-,j,f Sound Pressure Level in Decibels equals 10 log Pl T P2 where P2 equals 0.0002 dynes/cin2 If the noise is not smooth and continuous, one or more of the corrections in Table 3 below shall be added to or subtracted from each of the decibel levels given above in Table 2. TA]~LE 3 Type of Operation or Character of Noise Noise source operates less thazl 20`2 of any one hour period Noise source operates less than 5~ of any one hour period Noise source operates less than l~ of any one hour period Noise of impulsive character (hanunering, etc . ) Noise of periodic character (17un1, screech, etc. ) *Apply one of these corrections only. Correction in Decibels Plus 5* Plus 10* Plus 15* Minus 5 Minus 5 F. Glare - Whether direct or reflected, such as from floodlights, or high temperature processes, and as differentiated from general illumination, shall not be visible at any property line. G. Exterior Lighting - Any lights used for exterior illumination shall direct light away from adjoining properties. H. Vibrations - Vibrations shall not be discernible from any property line to the human sense' o:~,~ feeling for three minutes or more duration in any one hour. I. Radiation - .Operations shall cause no dangerous radiation at any property line as specified by the regulations of the United States Atomic Energy Commission. J. Waste - All sewage and industrial wastes shall be treated and disposed of in such a manner as to comply with Virginia water quality standards and Environmental Protection Acts as applicable. - 12 - Each user permitted in this Park shall provide adequate J off-street parking for its employees and visitors and exterior - lighting requirements, as set forth for off-street parking requirements, as herein adopted or may be adopted by Roanoke County. Development plans under the B-2 District shall be set forth such that any building is placed along the frontage of the lot with no less than 80~ of the parking requirements. being placed at the rear of the property. Development plans under the M-2 District shall set forth that all disturbed land areas shall provide a ground cover of either landscaping, seeding, gravel or pavement_ LANDSCAPING No buildings o.r structures above ground shall extend beyond the setback lines and is hereby declared that said area between the setback lines and the property lines is to be used for either open landscaping and green areas or off-street paved parking areas. Within the B-2 zoning, a minimum of a 3 foot wide planted perimeter shall extend along all parking lot areas and between buildings and adjacent property lines. Planting shall be in conformity to Section 21-92 General Standards, Subsection C7 of the Screening and Buffering Ordinance of the County of Roanoke, as now adopted or as may hereafter be amended, excepting trees shall not be planted as to obstruct the visibility of buildings within the B-2 zoning from traffic on 460 East. Within the M-2 zoning the road frontage of the parking areas shall be adequately screened to lower the visual impact of the parking areas, specifically recommended screening materials shall include decorative masonry walls, brick walls, a combination of earth berms.with landscaping. All landscaping shall be properly maintained thereafter in a slightly and we 11 kept condition. Landscaping specifically shall be in conformity to Section 21-92, General standards, subsection C7 of the Sc~~ening and Buffer~.ng Ordinance of the County of Roanoke, - 13 - -5- /'~ .., ,~ USE LIMITATIONS Without otherwise limiting the provisions of The Performance Standards or any other terms or conditions of these restrictions, the building or premises, except as otherwise provided in these restrictive covenants may be used for any use permitted under Section 23-2, B-2 General Commercial District and Section 21-24, M-2 General Industrial District of the Zoning Ordinance of the County of Roanoke, Virginia, updated August 4, 1986, excepting the following uses shall not be allowed: B-2 zoning to exclude the following uses as set forth under Section 21-23-2 of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance update August 4, 1986, public billiard parlor and poolrooms, golf driving range, flea markets and public dance halls. M-2 zoning to be limited to uses under Section 21-24-2, Paragraph A - (1) and (8) and which shall further exclude the uses as set forth under Section 21-24-1 of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance - updated August 4, 1986, kennels with exterior runs or yards and flea markets. HEIGHT LIMITATIONS Improvements erected on the property, subject to this declaration, shall not exceed 30 feet in height provided, however, that accessory structures or equipment required to operate and maintain the building and provide adequate fire and related security or structures as specifically related to Section 21-24, Paragraph E under the Zoning Ordinance may exceed this height with the written approval of Grantor, its successors or assigns. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW These covenants shall and do hereby provide that no improvements as herein defined shall be erected or placed on any building - 14 - ~~- site in said development until ~hc plot plans, showing a location of such improvements on the particular building site and an architectural sketch or an acceptable rendering showing the external design of the building and site improvements have been submitted to and approved in writing by the Grantor or assigns as to the conformity and harmony of design with existing structures in the development, and as to location of the improvements on the building site, given due regard to the anticipate use thereof as shall- may affect adjoining structures, uses and operations, such approval not to be unreasonably withheld. The right to approve or disapprove the proposed plan shall rest with the Grantor or its assigns or successors. SETBACK REQUIREMENTS No part of the structure shall be erected nearer the street than the setback line as required by the Zoning Ordinance or no less than shown by recorded map of Perimeter-East Commerce Park. BUILDING FACADES M-2 DISTRICT - All buildings erected on the lots within the M-2 General Industrial District overlooking Route 460 East shall be so constructed that the portion visible from Route 460 shall be faced with brick or an equivalent material or shall be screened by use of specifically recommended screening material, such as, decorative masonry walls, brick walls or a combination of earth berms and landscaping. Landscaping specifically shall be in conformity to Section 21-92 of the Screening and Buffering Ordinance of the County of Roanoke, Virginia, as now adopted or as may hereafter be amended to provide adequate screening from visibility. OUTSIDE STORAGE The storage of bulk commodities or any other material stored outside of the structure shall. be confined to an area so screened as to minimize the visua], impact to adjacent property owners - 15 - 7- and highway view. Acceptable :screening materials shall include wood stockade fence, decorative masonry walls, brick walls and earth berms with combinatio~z of landscaping. FUEL STORAGE All fuel storage shall be located and constructed in full compliances with rules and regulations of any governmental agency or agencies having jurisdictions over such matters. Bulk storage of all liquids, shall be permitted only in locations which do not detract from general appearance of the property and which comply with the rules and regulations of any governmental agency or agencies having jurisdictions over such matters. UTILITY LINES All utility services, inclusive of electric shall be placed underground between the property line and the structural improvements. ENFORCEMENT RIGHTS All persons or entities owning property within the Perimeter East Conunerce Park shall have the right to enforce the above conditions and restrictions by a suit in equity to prohibit a violation of such restrictions or by action at law to recover damages for such violations. TEMPORARY STRUCTURES No trailer or other outbuildings of temporary character shall be built or used within the industrial park, except as may be required during the time of construction. EASEMENTS All lots are subject to easements, as shown on the map of Perimeter East Commerce Park as to be recorded and may be amended to properly service properties within the Industrial Park and satisfy the requirements of appla.cable utility authorities end g®ver~men~~i ~~~~~~~~, - 16 - . - /~8-~, PETITIONER: (,ONSTR(JCTION AND GIIQERAL LAHORIIZS' LOCAL UNION N0. 980 CASE N[II~1BER: 3-1/88 Planning Commission Hearing Date: January 5, 1988 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: January 26, 1988 1. RD~UEST Petition of Construction and General Laborers' Local Union No. 980 to rezone a 1.14 acre tract from A-l, Agricultural and M-1, Industrial to 8-2- Bu~oximatelo construct an office, located on the north side of Peters Creek Road app Y 150 feet east of its intersection with Centurion Road in the Hollins Magisterial District. 2. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION No one in opposition was present at the Planning Catumission Public Hearing. 3. SIGNIFICANT IMPACT FACTORS a. None. 4. PROFFERED CONDITIONS a. Use of subject property will be limited to office space. b. Property will be developed in substantial accord with the site plan su)~mitted with the following exceptions: (1) remaining undeveloped portion of the property, if developed, will have landscaped front yard, parking at the side or rear of the building, and one sign of limited message, simple geometric shape, consistent lettering style, with adequate spacing; (2) access to the building shown on the site plan will be shared with either property to the northwest or with any buildings developed on the undeveloped portion of the subject property; (3) screening and buffering on the site will comply with Sect. 21-92 of the County Zoning Ordinance; and (4) on-site lighting will be of limited height (14' maximtm~) as not to impact adjacent duplexes. c. Sign will be of limited message, simple gecanetric shape, consistent lettering style with adequate spacing. No billboard advertising permitted. 5. CONA4ISSIONER'S MOTION, WTE AND REASON Mrs. Flippen moved to approve the petition with proffered conditions. The motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Witt, Gordon, Jones, Flippen Winstead NAYS: None ABSENT: None 6. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE a. None. 7. ATTACHMENTS Concept Plan (8~" x 11") ,/ Vicinity Map (8~" x 11") ,/ Staff Report Other: Robert Sta zer, Planning Commission Secretary ~Z O N N A1Att1eAL 6~~EQ- dF A-A7uQ.F1 'T2fES 1 'tom ~°P°~y Lnc PR~1~~ 23 (sl,4~d amass) I I (~~. '~~~~~}~ ~inC CS~r~ ~~~~s~er~SS 1 f ~ s ~ ~ ' ~,Et.tlT~JE. 1 f ~ ~AR~- ~.~~ 1 i ~- f c CA~Lr•ETE vJA+~ _ ( f ~ E~ 1 PAIZK~J4 ~3~ 1 $LCb. i ~ _ 4350 ~F ~: ,.,..._ ~ •~ ~'i ~ 1 S~ StZE ~ SfrbK'K TO MEET' ~ ~- 1 RKf. CD. Zo~i"~ PEQ't #'~TEP~S (,~EEi~ RoAL~ 'e _ _ _ ~ _ __ _ SP~1~ ~'~- i.lEvJ OF~rGE _ _ ___ __ --- ~S7 ~~ CT Mori ~- G E~1 ~E~~-- ~8~ E'++C~ ~ i g~_ ~ ~E i r ~~~ ~ ~E ti ~. ~C~(~I7 -3- 1\ V 1\ 1 11 _ A k` ROANOKE COUNTY Construction and General DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT Laborers' Local Union No. 981 - 4 _ M-1 and A-1 to B-2 ^ ^v~~~^ • ^ ~nr~^ CASE NUMBER: 3-1/88 STAFF REPORT PETITIONER: CONSTRUCTION AND GENERAL LABORERS' DATE: DECEMBER 28, 1987 REVIEWED BY: DALE CASTELLOW Petition of Construction and General Laborers' Local Union No. 980 to rezone a 1.14 acre tract from A-1, Agricultural and M-1, Industrial to B-2, Business to construct an office, located on the north side of Peters Creek Road approximately 150 feet east of its intersection with Centurion Road in the Hollins Magisterial District. 1. NATURE OF REQUEST a. Conditional request to rezone 1.14 acres for the purpose of constructing two professional office buildings. b. Attached concept plan and zoning vicinity map describe the project more fully. 2. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS a. The B-2, General Commercial District permits a wide variety of commercial and office uses. The petitioner has proffered conditions which limit the use to professional office space. b. Site plan review will be required to ensure compliance with County regulations. c. Commercial entrance permit will be required from VDOT and the City of Roanoke. 3. SITE CHARACTERISTICS a. Topography: Site is predominantly flat except for a small ridge along the rear property line which separates the site from the adjacent duplex development. b. Ground Cover: Predominantly clear with low growing vegetation. A natural buffer of mature trees is located along the rear property line. 4. AREA CHARACTERISTICS a. Future Growth Priority: Situated within the Peters Creek Community Planning Area. It is designated as Transition where office and institutional uses are encouraged. b. General area is predominated by a major four lane highway that provides access to numerous office and strip commercial establishments. An existing duplex development abuts the property to the north. 5. LAND USE IMPACT ASSESSMENT Rating: Rate each factor according to the impact of the proposed action. Use a scale of 1 through 5. 1 = positive impact, 2 = negligible impact, 3 = manageable impact, 4 = disruptive impact, 5 = severe impact, and N/A = not applicable. - 5 - ~~' - ~' RATING FACTOR COMMENTS LAND USE COMPATIBILITY 2 a. Comprehensive Plan: 1985 Comprehensive Development Plan has placed this area within a Transition land use category. The petitioner's request complies with both the land use plan map and defined policies. The Transition land use category encourages the development of office and institutional uses and retail uses if clustered. The petitioner's request conforms with policies TR-7 (traffic coordination among adjacent sites), TR-8 (enhance the quality of highway frontage development), and TR-9 (screening and buffering along rear property line). 2 b. Surrounding Land: Property abuts an existing duplex development, office and commercial uses, and Peters Creek Road, a heavily traveled major arterial highway. Petitioner has proffered low intensity lighting which will be situated to minimize impact on adjacent duplexes. 3 c. Neighboring Area: Residential with strip commercial and office developments along Peters Creek Road. 2 d. Site Layout: Petitioner has complied with policies TR-7, TR-8, and TR-9. 2 e. Architecture: Similar materials will be utilized in the construction of both buildings. 2 f. Screening and Landscaping: Concept plan showing the location of proposed screening and buffering has been proffered. Screening and buffering will comply with Section 21-92 of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance. 2 g. Amenities: Adequate parking provided. Appropriate steps will be taken to minimize lighting impact on adjacent residences. 2 h. Natural Features: No negative effect. TRAFFIC 2 i. Street Capacities: Combined facilities will generate approximately 200 vehicle trip ends per day. Current ADT on Peters Creek Road is 19,802. 2 j. Circulation: Access to the individual buildings will be shared. UTILITIES 3 k. Water: Existing water main on Century Drive must be extended to serve the property. 2 1. Sewer: Adequate transmission and treatment. DRAINAGE 2 m. Basin: No negative effect. N/A n. Floodplain: - 6 - ~' _.." 2 0. 2 p. N/A q. N/A r. 1 s. PUBLIC SERVICES Fire Protection: Within established service area. Rescue: Within established service area. Parks and Recreation: School: TAX BASE - Land and Improvement Value: $220,000 - Taxable Gross Sales/Year: None at this time - Total Employees: Unknown - Total revenue to the County/Year: Approximately $2,530 based on assessment ENVIRONMENT 2 t. Air: 2 u. Water: 2 v. Soils: 2 ~. Noise: 2 x. Signage: Petitioner has proffered that each building will erect one sign of limited message, simple geographic shape, consistent lettering style, with adequate spacing. 6. PLAN CONSISTENCY This area is designated as Transition and is consistent with the land use plan map and applicable policies. 7. STAFF EVALUATION a. Strengths: (1) Proposal conforms with the applicable policies of the Future Land Use Guide. (2) Petitioner has proffered the specific use as well as the concept plan. (3) Because of the close proximity of the adjacent duplexes, the petitioner has proffered the height and intensity of on site lighting. b. Weaknesses: (1) Uncertain as to type of future business to be located in second proposed building. -7- ~- w ~- L. 0 U 0 0 w 0 a. n_ X88-,5 VIRGINIA: Page 1 of 2 BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY A 1.14 acre parcel of land, ) generally located Route 117 (Peter Creek Rd.) next to Executive Park) within the Hollins ) FINAL ORDER Magisterial District, and ) recorded as parcel # 37.08-1-1 ) in the Roanoke County Tax Records.) TO 'CHE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY: WHEREAS, your Petitioner Construction and General Laborers' Local Union No. 980 did petition the Board of County Supervisors to rezone the above- referenced parcel of land from A-1 and M-1 District to B-2 District for the purpose of building and occupyin offices WHEREAS, after due legal notice, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing of the petition on lan 19 ~, at which time, all parties in interest were given an opportunity tc be heard; and WHEREAS, after full consideration, the Board of County Supervisors determined that the rezoning be approved with proffered .. conditions 1/26/88. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDERED that the aforementioned parcel of land, which is contained in the Roanoke County Tax ~4aps as Parcel 37.08-1-1 and recorded in Deed Book 800, page 585 and legally described below, be rezoned from A-1 and M-1 District to n ~ District. - 8 - i~~_,~ Page 2 of 2 Legal Description of Property: BEGINNING at an iron on the northwest side of Virginia Route No. 117 at the easternmost corner of a 0.569 acre parcel conveyed to Roy L. Tolbert, et ux, by deed dated March 15, 1966, and recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, in Deed Book 800, page 585; thence with the northeasterly line of said Tolbert property N. 33° 56' 30" W. 248.29 feet to a point; thence N. 55° 30' 10" E. 200.0 feet to a point; thence with a new division line through the property of Branch & Associates, Incor- porated, S. 33° 56' 30" E. 250.23 feet to an iron on the northwest side of Virginia Route No. 117; thence with the line of Route No. 117, S. 56° 03' 30" W. 200.0 feet to the place of BEGINNING, and containing 1.14 acres, more or less, and being shown on a plat by T. P. Parker, C.L.S., dated January 15, 1971; BE IT FURTHE R ORDERED that a copy of this order be transmitted to the Secretary of the Planning Commission and that he be directed to reflect that change on the official zoning map of Roanoke County. ADOPTED on motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor McGraw and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Garrett, Johnson, McGraw, Nickens, Robers NAYS: ABSENT: ~ ~~~~ Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: Real Estate Assessor Development Review Coordinator Director of Planning _9- VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY / 8~-Jr' A 1.14 acre parcel of land, ) generally located State Rt. 117 ) (Peters Creek Rd.) between Exec. Park & Scot PROFFER Snyderwithin the Hollins ) OF Magisterial District, and ) CONDITIONS recorded as parcel # 37.08-1-1 ) in the Roanoke County Tax Records. ) TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY: Being in accord with Sec. 15.1-491.1 et seq. of the Code of Virginia and Sec. 21-10~5E of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance, the Petitioner Construction & General Laborers' Local Union fVo. 980 hereby voluntarily proffers to the v~ Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia the following conditions to the ~ rezoning of the above-referenced parcel of land: ~ 1. Use of subject property will be limited to office space. w z. 0 2. Property will be developed in substantial accord with the site plan submitted ° with the following exceptions: Q a) remaining undeveloped portion of the property, if developed, will have Land- o scaped front yard, parking at the~side or rear of the building, and one sign of ~ limited message, simple geometric shape, consistent lettering style, with ~ adequate spacing. Q b) access to the building shown on the site plan will be shared with either property to the northwest or with any buildings developed on the undeveloped portion of the subject property. c) screening and buffering on the site will. comply with Section 21-92 of the County Zoning Ordinance. d) on site lighting will be of limited height (14' feet maximum) as not to impact adjacent duplexes. 3. Sign will be of limited message, Respectfully submitted, simple geometric shape, consistent lettering style with adequate spacing. No billboard advertising permitted. ~ ~ ~/ Petitioner - 10 - Page 1 of 2 VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY p, 1.14 acre parcel of land, ) generally located State Route 117 ) (Peters Creek Rd.) next to Execut~.ve Park ) PET~ION within the Hollins Magisterial District, and ) recorded as parcel # 37.08-1-1 ) in the Roanoke County Tax Records.) TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOK a d General Laborers' Local Construction WHEREAS, your Petitioner Union No. 980 ctfully files this petition pursuant to Section 21-105 of the respe anoke County Zoning Ordinance and in accordance with the Code o Ro 'r inia of 1950, as amended, and would respectfully show t e Vi g following: arcel of 1) The Petitioner is the owner of the above-referenced p land. rovisions of the 2) The property is presently zoned under the p Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance as A-1 and M-1 District. 3) The property is designated Transition in the Future Land Use Guide of the Roanoke County Comprehensive Development Plan. Your Petitioner now desires to have this property rezoned as 4) District for the purpose of B-2 building and occupying offices on said propert Page 2 of 2 WHEREFORE, your Petitioner respectfully requests that the Zoning Ordinance of Roanoke County be amended and that the above-referenced parcel of land be rezoned as set out in number 4. FURTHER, your Petitioner requests that this petition be referred b the Secretary to the Roanoke County Planning Commission for its Y consideration and recommendation. Respectfully submitted, etitioner L E G A L N O T I C E iven to all interested persons that the ublic hearing at their Notice is hereby g January 26, 1988, Board of Supervisors will hold a P Roanoke County inning at 7:00 p.m• on Tuesday, evening session beg Room at the Roanoke County Administration Center, inia, on the petition of lggg, In the Community S.W., Roanoke, Virg 980, requesting Local Union o- 3738 Brambleton Avenue, M-1 Industrial to B-2 Business of a Construction and Gen~icultubaleand rezoning from A-1 Ag 1.14 acres and located onitseintersectaonowith ers tract containing 150 feet east of Creek Road approximately isterial District. Centurion Road in the Hollins Mag The County ezoning has been requested valcwithrprofferedfconditions. R Planning Commission recommends apPrO and amendments of the Zoning Ordinance of Roanokelanunand other A copy of the petition, site p thereto as well as a thps reQuest may be examined in the office of the documents related to ment, located in Room 600 at the Roanoke County Department of Deve P Administration Center. ed persons will provide assistance to handicapPeQuested to Roanoke County s, Such individuals a772-2018) if desiring to attend public hearing t the County office of Persono~eattendance,<<703] contac special provisions are necessary 1988. Given under a-y hand this 7th day of January, Mary De uty Roanoke County Board of Supervisors please publish in the eveWo~gdeNewsoon• of the Roanoke Times and Tuesday, January 12- 1988 Tuesday, January 19, 1988 Direct the bill for~Pablication to: Gin Laborers Construction & Local Union No. 980 5219 Peters Creek 824019 Roanoke, Virginia PETITIONER: E~IF~tETT J. MTT,FS CASE NUMBER: 4-1/88 f ~ ~ _ c!~ Planning Co~rmission Hearing Date: January 5, 1988 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: January 26, 1988 1. REQUEST Petition of Everett J. Miles to rezone a 0.25 acre tract fran B-2, Business to B-3, Business to operate a used car lot, located north of the intersection of Route 311 and Route 630 in the Catawba Magisterial District. 2. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION No one in opposition was present at the Planning Cannission Public Hearing. 3. SIGNIFICANT IMPACT FACERS a. Site Layout: Site appearance would benefit from closer adherence to the policies described by C-4 specifying safe access and congestion minimization, and C-6 dealing with safeguards from commercial disturbances including lighting and noise. By necessity, vehicles rather than landscaping and building facade will be prominent from street. At most, parking may be provided for 15 vehicles, including spaces for employees, customers and automobiles for sale. b. Natural Features: See floodplain comments. c. Floodplain: Subject site lies 100 feet west and north of approximate 100- year floodplain. Immediate area to south and east was inundated in 1985 flood. 4. PROFFERED CONDITIONS a. Use of property will be limited to used automobile sales. b. No outside overnight parking of inoperative or junk vehicles. c. No on-premises automobile repairs shall be conducted. d. Existing entrance west of Hanging Rock Market (facing VA 311) shall provide only means of access to this business. e. Maximum signage size to be 4' x 8'. No portable signs permitted. f. No more than 20 vehicles on site. 5. COMMISSIONER'S MOTION, VOTE AND REASON Mr. Jones moved to approve the petition with proffered conditions. The motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Witt, Gordon, Jones, Flippen, Winstead NAYS: None ABSENT: None 6. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE a. None. 7. ATI'ACI-~IENTS Concept Plan (8~" x 11") Vicinity Map (8~" x 11") Staff Report Other: Robert Stal r, Planning Commission Secretary i8~_ ll, i=. t I Irlrn I r s; , I ~'~`~;~ ~~:' ~'f Ij~,r ~ ~'b ICI" ,rlii ~f ~ ~, RE`MA/.V/NG P,POPE~TYi"O .~AME.S •.4' PH/G /F'S ~ ~• x' ` r S9 iL2,O~+~S 5,~o,e~72~y~ ,'~~; a (I!~ «,ltr~,eo.~ - ' I. ~'~f xt/43 ./x'33"E o„~ i" ~ see- aco ; I .. I I' ,,Rp4.00 r, 5 i ~ . . , /~n/' is i ;:y. I L'. I ~~'(~^,'~ ~{~. PiN I ~ I /'ox•v arsr20f. 'I~ ,l/EN/ L/NES < t A - d I I ~ rr ~ 1 `.i ~ I P 1 i ~ ,R ` >/ ' r: sqS~ _ . .'i i ` 211 I~, ph i ~~; i cif w . i~~. vt is ?. i ~ d: ' l i s i v °~ m ,.. ~__= i~. ~ ~. ;N ~ / i F~ 'C Z~STy.~CiNOE4BLOC/~ APARTMENT- ~NOU5111i.'~ ~ ~ 54.7 _ _ I 4 1.- 4 1 y -_ 6.01 ~,~' .. S. 7,t V ~E .. N ~ ~x " `2c.o n } ' 9.r N / I o.er C~wocevcoc.c' ~ Fc I ,5w'CO ~3~~I L. G.i?AGEfOfF/ceN 1~ ' I N Giw/ - ;: ~ ~l p .. w ~o•~ sir ~ _' 8 .7-To: /Ra.x/ •.-i:.. I ~H.PaYaO i~~ rlr'fj.., "caMC,~i;- ~ 1Q s _. f~J` +544'00 W V 1 r~ I .~,"~i~~ ~~r~'~}°~t' ~I i F ~. R 1 O ' p~ 1 t I L 1~: 1~ ' Y 1 tEM - ~ 1[ .~~~ ~1 l~ri~ I ~II~ ~ 1 ~~~ll ~~i rl ~~~l ~~ f (~(/~ A OI~TEr O. 3// i, I~, ~ I, ~ I . ,. ~pt~ 11 ) ~k, ,~ • r ` I `i~"~l~ ~{I FI ~ I u",.It~l OF <y .Y'3rgy; ~ ~ ,,; OF .4' /.BG~ ,ACRE ;TRACT! 3E/.VG 'CONVEYED a TO ~ `. •~ ~' ~ El/EQE"T T .JAC/ISd,V M/L ES ~ ~~'`y• .5/TU.4T~ AT yAA/G/.U6 ROCK /N =`r~ t~. ACK -Q BESS.'; c~, QOAA/OKE CDU~t/ T y, ' ' V LPG ~N/.4 D`Slfi~ R ~ .5G'ALE: /' .O' OEC. 5, /973 fFIG1TE No, . 3070`' ~ /3y : ~ , ~JAG'K G. /3E_SS _ / CF„PT/F/EO LAn/O SU.?/EYO.P ~LgND' ~~•„ ,,~ ' R I i ' Icy '' ~ w Y~.re! a~„1.::..r~..j ;._. -- ~- ~_:~...~ di .':.'. ,._, :..iii-r~.l ~~' f "~~ ~ - ~ _~ _ - .. __! f ~ .. - 2 - \ ~\ \\p 56~ ela0 X6.00 \ \\ ~ \ \~c \\ 9 4, \ ~, `\~ R t \~\ 1 2]004 101 n sl4lcl \ \ RE ~ o z ~ \ I.ei4 , • lec4 12 L~04 ' • 2.MK 4 11 10 ^ ue4 zss4 ! s zDl4 z-D4 ~n4 / Q 7 ~ / 1.9l4 B' Z a / 1664 / n s \ 2.124 17e4 / • \ / 21 ~ IHI4 2.N4 S ~ ~ / .l04 W 4 x2.;;4 ~ / 13-Z z~ ,y\\ \ vz.. n ~ b ~ 29 1~• 100 ~ ' 1.294 / ~ 1.694 '° M -~ Lel 4~a ///~~~ M~ l01 1[ _' `• ~ I N4 d e ROANOKE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT -3- -I O \ X90 4 DI 62]64 KI ~~ ~ M-z ~- - - nvn ~ ~~ ~ ~ l ao4 e ~ 9 i_/ 6 p~. IS 'II ~~ 7 LO] M ~^\12 ' 1404 ~ ~~ , I~ .~.. I7 RE M-~ s« rho w10 ,.,,~, A~ 4j9 Lx Q-3 \ \ ~\ Everett J. Miles 6-2 to B-3 ^ ^v^^~^ ^ ^ ~~^/7^ /CJ - ~j STAFF REPORT CASE NUMBER: 4-1/88 REVIEWED BY: TIM BEARD PETITIONER: EVERETT J. MILES DATE: DECEMBER 28, 1987 Petition of Everett J. Miles to rezone a 0.25 acre tract from B-2, Business to B-3, Business to operate a used car lot, located north of the intersection of Route 311 and Route 630 in the Catawba Magisterial District. 1. NATURE OF REQUEST a. Conditional request to establish and operate a used car lot. b. Attached concept plan and zoning vicinity map generally describes project. 2. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS a. B-3 zoning district permits numerous intensive commercial uses. Petitioner has proffered use of property to be limited to used automobile sales. b. Special Exception permit from Board of Supervisors required. c. No new commercial entrance permit requirement from VDOT is anticipated considering owner's intention to use existing entrance and not to subdivide the property. d. Site plan review will be required to ensure compliance with County regulations. 3. SITE CHARACTERISTICS a. Topography: Flat. Steep slope adjoins rear portion of parking lot. b. Ground Cover: Existing asphalt and gravel. 4. AREA CHARACTERISTICS a. Future Growth Priority: Situated within the Peters Creek Community Planning Area. Designated as a high growth area not currently served by urban services. (Public water to be available in 1988.) b. General area is characterized by mixed land use which is primarily commercial at the core. Residential and woodland uses are found outside the immediate area. 5. LAND USE IMPACT ASSESSMENT Rating: Rate each factor according to the impact of the proposed action. Use a scale of 1 through 5. 1 = positive impact, 2 = negligible impact, 3 = manageable impact, 4 = disruptive impact, 5 = severe impact, and N/A = not applicable. -4- X88 ~- ~ RATING FACTOR COMMENTS LAND USE COMPA'PIBILITY 3 a. Comprehensive Plan: 1985 Comprehensive Development Plan has placed this area within a Core land use category. The petitioner's request is consistent with the land use plan map and certain defined policies, specifically C-l, C-2, and portions of C-4. Other portions of C-4 and C-6 indicate inconsistencies with respect to access and location of signage. 3 b. Surrounding Land: General retail adjoining site with surface mining (soil borrow pit) to the northwest and woodland across VA 311 to the southeast. 3 c. Neighboring Area: See surrounding land. 4 d. Site Layout: Site appearance would benefit from closer adherence to the policies described by C-4 specifying safe access and congestion minimization, and C-6 dealing with safeguards from commercial disturbances including lighting and noise. By necessity, vehicles rather than landscaping and building facade will be prominent from street. At most, parking may be provided for 15 vehicles, including spaces for employees, customers and automobiles for sale. 3 e. Architecture: Existing two-story cinder block building with exterior siding and 1200 square feet of total floor area. 2 f. Screening and Landscaping: Per ordinance. 3 g. Amenities: None. 4 h. Natural Features: See floodplain comments. TRAFFIC 2 i. Street Capacities: Current ADT of VA 311 is,approximately 5,760 vehicles. Petitioner's business would generate less than 100 ADT. 3 j. Circulation: Access by necessity must be from VA 311. Entrance is to be shared with Hanging Rock Market to the east. New traffic signals recently installed. UTILITIES 2 k. Water: Adequate source and distribution (public water to be available by mid-1988). 2 1. Sewer: Adequate treatment and transmission. DRAINAGE 3 m. Basin: Mason's Creek. 4 n. Floodplain: Subject site lies 100 feet west and north of approximate 100-year floodplain. Immediate area to south and east was inundated in 1985 flood. -5- i ~ ~ .... ~ PUBLIC SERVICES 2 0. Fire Protection: Within established service standard. 2 p. Rescue: Within established service standard. N/A q. Parks and Recreation: N/A r. School: TAX BASE 1 s. - Land and Improvement Value: Est. $40,000 - Taxable Gross Sales/Year: Est. $50,000 - Total Employees: 4 - Total revenue to the County/Year: Approximately $1,250 ENVIRONMENT 2 t. Air: 2 u. Water: 2 v. Soils: 2 w. Noise: 3 x: signage: Petitioner has stated verbally that signage will be painted or installed on building. 'No additional pole signs will be installed. All signage is to be controlled by ordinance section 21-93. 6. PLAN CONSISTENCY This area is designated as Core. The petitioner's request is consistent with the land use plan map and most Core policies. (See land use compatibility.) 7. STAFF EVALUATION a. Strengths: (1) Minimal impact on surrounding land use. (2) Minimal impact on future urban utilities and current services. (3) Specific land use has been proffered. b. Weaknesses: (1) Inconsistent with selected Core area land use policies. (2) Site is near a congested intersection and is quite constrained physically (steep slope to immediate rear), impeding smooth traffic flow and minimizing number of available parking spaces. (3) Flood potential. -6- VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY c~ a~ z ~; 0 U O ~-- c~ w 0 a a A 0.25 acre parcel of land, ) generally located 1806 Thomason ) '~Memori al Drive ) within the Catawba ) FINAL ORDER Magisterial District, and ) i~ ~_. , Page 1 of 2 recorded as parcel # ~h_~~_?_? ) in the Roanoke County Tax Records.) TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY: WHEREAS, your Petitioner Everett J. Miles did petition the Board of County Supervisors to rezone the above- referenced parcel of land from B-2, Business District to B-3, Business _ District for the purpose of operating a used car lot ~ WHEREAS, after due legal notice, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing of the petition on Jan. 5 19 ~, at which time, all p~:rties in interest were given an opportunity to be heard; and s WHEREAS, after full consideration, the Board of County Supervisors determined that the rezoning be approved with proferred conditions 1/26/88. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDERED that the aforementioned parcel of land, which is contained in the Roanoke County Tax Maps as Parcel 36.01-2-3 and recorded in Deed Book and legally described below, be rezoned from B-2, Business District to B-3, Business with conditions District. -7- Legal Description of Property: /~ ~- ,o~, Beginning at an iron on the southern most corner of the property on Virginia Route 311 conveyed to Everett Jackson Miles by deed dated December 5, 1973; thence with the northwesterly line of said Miles property N46.OOW. 75.3 feet to a point; thence N43o16'33"E. 54.7 feet to a poi~t; thence S4G~00'E. 75.3 feet to a point; thence with the line of route 311, S44 OOW 54.7 feet to the place of BEGINNING. , BE IT FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this order be transmitted to the Secretary of the Planning Commission and that he be directed to reflect that change"on the official zoning map of Roanoke County. Supervisor Nickens ADOPTED on motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Garrett, Johnson, Nickens, Robers I~YS ABSTAIN ~~: Supervisor McGraw ~~ , Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: Real Estate Assessor Development Review Coordinator Director of Planning _g_ VIRGINIA: ~ ~_~ .~ BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY A ~]~ ~ x ~~, acre parcel of land, ) generally located ) v~ / ~~~/7/~~.5 ~, ~; /Y) t n-, l J r ) PROFFER -~ within the ~ -,- ~1 ~ ~/.; l,~} ) CONDITIONS Magisterial District, and ) recorded as parcel # ~~ , ~ j_ ,~- _~ ) in the Roanoke County Tax Records. ) TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY: Being in accord with Sec. 15.1-491.1 et seq. of the Code of '~ Virginia and Sec. 21-1O5E. of the Roanoke County Zoning ¢ Ordinance, the Petitioner ~~/~ R T T T ~ ~ ~"' ~ ~ F < ~' hereby voluntarily proffers to the Board of Supervisors of z w o Roanoke County, Virginia the following conditions to the rezoning U 0 of the above-referenced parcel of land: ~-- 0 w 0 _~ (1) Use of property will be limited to used automobile sales. ( ) No outside overnight parking of inoperative or junk vehicles. (3) No on-premises automobile repairs shall be conducted. (4) Existing entrance west of Hanging Rock Market (facing VA 311) shall provide only means of access to this business. (5) Maximum signage size to be 4' x 8'. No portable signs permitted. (6) No more than 20 vehicles on site. Respectfully submitted, ~---, -~ Petitioner ~/ ' _9 - VIRGINIA: Page 1 of 2 BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY A ~, ~o acre parcel of land, ) b (~ / generally located~~~ Tf14M7~SdN~ within the (~ ~} f is//jam ) PETITION Magisterial District, and ) recorded as parcel # ,~~• G'f -:~ -3 ) in the Roanoke County Tax Records.) TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY: WHEREAS, your Petitioner ~'~/'F T % .~ ~~~i'l ~'~ respectfully files this petition pursuant to Section 21-105 of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance and in accordance with the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended, and would respectfully show the following: 1) The Petitioner is the owner of the above-referenced parcel of land. 2) The property is presently zoned under the provisions of the ke Count R Zoning Ordinance as .13' Z y oano District. -' erty ro 3) The is designated L oRE p p in the Future Land Use Guide of the Roanoke County Comprehensive Development Plan. 4) Your Petition er now desires to have this property rezoned as ~~__ ~~ District for the purpose of ~ U~ S~ L~'~r~' ~ ~%~' Page 2 of 2 WHEREFORE, your Petitioner respectfully requests that the Zoning Ordinance of Roanoke County be amended and that the above-referenced parcel of land be rezoned as set out in number 4. FURTHER, your Petitioner requests that this petition be referred by the Secretary to the Roanoke County Planning Commission for its consideration and recommendation. Respectfully submitted, i Petitioner VIRGINIA: Page 1 of 2 BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY A 0_~5 acre parcel of land, ) generally located 1806 Thompson ) Memorial Drive ) within the Catawba ) RECOMMENDATION Magisterial District, and ) recorded as parcel # 36.01-2-3 ) in the Roanoke County Tax Records.) TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY: WHEREAS, your Petitioner Everett J. Miles has filed with the Secretary to the Planning Commission a petition to rezone the above-referenced parcel of land from q- Business District to ~ 3 Business District for the purpose of WHEREAS, the petition was referred to the Planning Commission which, after due legal notice as required by Se^_tion 15.1-431 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended, did hold a public hearing on lanT ~ 19 ~; and WHEREAS, at that public hearing all parties in interest were afforded an opportunity to be heard; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due consideration has recommended to the Board of County Supervisors that the rezoning be approved with proffered conditions Page 2 of 2 NOW, .THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission recommends to the Board of County Supervisors t'nat the above- referenced parcel of land be rezoned to B-3 motion of AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: District. The above action was adopted on Mr. Jones on second by and upon the following recorded vote: Witt, Gordon, Jones, Flippen, ~Jinstead None Pdone Respectfully submitted, ~~ Secretar Roanoke County Planning Commission VIRGINIA: Page 1 of 2 BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY A 1.14 acre parcel of land, ) generally located State Route 117 ) (Peters Creek Rd.) next to Executive Park within the Hollins ) RECOMMENDATION Magisterial District, and ) recorded as parcel # 37.08-1-1 ) in the Roanoke County Tax Records.) TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY: WHEREAS, your Petitioner Construction and General Laborers Local Union No. 980 has filed with the Secretary to the Planning Commission a petition to rezone the above-referenced parcel of land from A-1 and M-1 District to District for the purpose of B-2 building and occupying offices on said property WHEREAS, the petition was referred to the Planning Commission which, after due legal notice as required by Section 15.1-431 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended, did hold a public hearing on January 5, 19 g8 and WHEREAS, at that public hearing all parties in interest were afforded an opportunity to be heard; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due consideration has recommended to the Board of County Supervisors that the rezoning be approved with proffered conditions Page 2 of 2 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission recommends to the Board of County Supervisors that the above- referenced parcel of land be rezoned to B-2 Business with conditions _ District. The above action was adopted on motion of Mrs Flippen on second by and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Witt, Gordon, Jones., Flippen, Winstead NAYS : Plone ABSENT: None Respectfully submitted, GSA ~t~~ Secretary Roanoke County Planning Commission L E G A L N O T I C E Notice is hereby given to all interested persons that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at their evening session beginning at 7:00 p.m. on Tuesday, January 26„ 1988, in the Community Room at the Roanoke County Administration Center, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, S.W., Roanoke, Virginia, on the petition of Everett J. Miles, requesting a special exception permit and rezoning from B-2 Business to B-3 Business of a tract containing 0.25 acre and located north of the intersection of Route 311 and Route 630 in the Catawba Magisterial District. Rezoning has been requested to operate a used car lot. The County Planning Commission recommends approval with proffered conditions. A copy of the Zoning Ordinance of Roanoke County and amendments thereto as well as a copy of the petition, site plan, and other documents related to this request may be examined in the office of the Department of Development, located in Room 600 at the Roanoke County Administration Center. Roanoke County will provide assistance to handicapped persons desiring to attend public hearings. Such individuals are requested to contact the County office of Personnel Services ([703] 772-2018) if special provisions are necessary for attendance. Given under my hand this 6th day of January, 1988. Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Please publish in the evening edition of the Roanoke Times and World News on: Tuesday, January 12, 1988 Tuesday, January 19, 1988 Direct the bill for Publication to: Everett J. Miles 1812 Thompson Memorial Drive Roanoke, Virginia 24019 A P P E A R A N C E R E Q U E S T - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PUBLIC HEARING ON i~ g-_ ~ .~-) I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so that I may comment. I agree to follow the guidelines listed below. WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. 1. Each speaker will have between three and five minutes available whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. 2. Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. 3. All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. 4. Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times . 5. Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. 6. INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. P L E A S E W R I T E L E G I B L Y (~~~'~~` ------ ----- ------- ,~~~ eu ~.~J NAME : ~- © ~ r' ~ ~ ~ ADDRESS : I 0 ~ ~. V-' ~ C S~' dC.-~~e- _ `~`` ~0~ ( ~-~ PHONE : ~j ~ G(~ ~ ~ ~ I PLEASE NOTE: (After filling out, give to the Deputy Clerk. Thank you.) PETITIONER: BRANIDLEI'ON M®ICAL ASSOCIATES CASE ~BER: 44-11/87 Planning Commission HearingDate. Janu~ar~yr26, 1988/ Dec~nber 1, 1987 Board of Supervisors Hearing 1. R~UEST Petition of Brambleton Medical Associat t ao arking 1ot481ocatedaimmediat ly Residential to B-1, Business to construc p isterial District. south of 3142 Brambleton Avenue in the Cave Spring Mag 2. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION Four residents voiced the following concerns: the type of structure that could be placed on the property; residential properties will become mo of li hting to Brambleton Avenue; devaluation of residential property; the type g be used. 3. SIGNIFICANT IMPACT FACTORS rehensive Development Plan has placed this area a. Comprehensive Plan: 1985 Camp The proposed use is within a Neighborhood Conservation landaus pol is ges and map. Appropriate inconsistent with the land use p land use designation for proposed land use is Transition. Note accompanying plan amenclinent request for a Transition designation. 4, PROFFERED CONDITIONS a. Cut only such trees as necessary on the tract to be rezoned for the construction and maintenance of parking. rking lot. b. Concept plan dated 11/25/87 stating proposed use for a pa rt and not exceed c. Lighting will be directed toward the interior of the prope y 14 feet in height. 5 , CONIl~iISSIONER' S MprrION, WTE AND REASON rove the petition with proffered conditions. 'The motion Mr. Witt moved to app carried with the following roll call vote: py~; Flippen, Witt, Gordon, Jones, Winstead NAYS: None ABSENT: None 6, DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE a. None. 7. ATTACHM~'NTS ,~ Concept Plan (8~~~ x 11") / Vicinity Map (8~ Staff Report Other: Robert Sta zer, Planning Commission Secretary ~,~~ q.> a `: +' g l Y A~~13 rW(• I--- ! ~ ~ ~ v~rn~tsin ;~livnau 3~+aveozl w ~ ~ $ ~~ ?~f d/H y ~ Y z c ~ ~ }~ ~ fed 5assv ~v~/o~ov nr1L~9wvbe ' = 'y' • ° 0 { . - c!I ~ ~! rvv~~d 1d~~ivo~ ~ ~ a ~ . ig_,~ p ~ '- ~ 0 ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~,' ~/ ,~ ~ f i" / /~ ~ / ~ i~ ;~ ~ // _ / ~~ / ~ 11/x, ~ ~/ ~ ~ ~• ) /P/.,~~ \~~~.//` I J , ~ ' e ~ ~bF ~~}r f ~4y / I 2W ~ . , ~ :.u,. ~ \\ ~1 , / ill 1 ~' Ir 3 1r i; 6 t - ~ / ~ t -- ~ - ---- .- ~-~ ~! _ / /; . V ~ .•. ~ J ~ ~ .lF ~ a... '"'~ I ~ .~ ' ~ / ~ _--- . ~' ~' i,~ .~ . ---.1J=~ / I I I -d L -y \y. ~jf\ r `\ cIY g~g~ t ".~i SFt r~w./~ A i , ~~~ ~ ~ '~ I i, / o o~Q f s O h ~Qp 4. ~ / ~~f ~$1W~ ~ :Q o o~ ~` A t I , ~ 02~~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ 4YY O 1 C CQ - 2 - ~, , i ia~- I D N~Qru ~" '` - 3 - `' ROANOKE COUNTY Brambleton Medical Associates ,c DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT R-Z t0 B-1 VICINITY MAP STAFF REPORT CASE NUMBER: REVIEWED BY: 44-11/87 ROB STALZER~ PETITIONER: ~,, ~. z. BRAMBLETON MEDICAL ASSOC. DATE: OCTOBER 27, 1987 UPDATED: JANUARY 6, 1988 Petition of Brambleton Medical Associates to rezone a 1.48 acre tract from R-1, Residential to B-1, Business to construct a parking lot, located immediately south. of 3142 Brambleton Avenue in the Cave Spring Magisterial District. 1. NATURE OF REQUEST a. Petition amended on November 24, 1987. Amended conditional request to rezone the property for the purpose of constructing a parking lot consisting of 42 spaces. If constructed, the parking lot will serve an existing office complex that is accessed by way of Brambleton Avenue. Subject tract has been owned by petitioners for ten years. b. Concept plan and zoning vicinity map describe project more fully. 2. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS a. B-1 zoning district permits a variety of office uses as well as higher density residential development. Petitioner has secured the proposed parking lot use by attaching proffered conditions to the rezoning. b. Site plan review required to insure compliance with County regulations. c. VDOT entrance permit required. 3. SITE CHARACTERISTICS a. Topography: Moderate slope towards Brambleton Avenue. b. Ground Cover: Heavily wooded with mature tree cover. 4. AREA CHARACTERISTICS a. Future Growth Priority: Situated within the Cave Spring Community Planning Area. Designated for stable future growth, urban services available, commercial infill encouraged. b. General area is densely developed with a mix of residential and commercial uses. Property adjoins established single family residential subdivision and existing professional office complex. 5. LAND USE IMPACT ASSESSMENT Rating: Rate each factor according to the impact of the proposed action. Use a scale of 1 through 5. 1 = positive impact, 2 = negligible impact, 3 = manageable impact, 4 = disruptive impact, 5 = severe impact, and N/A = not applicable. - 4 - RATING FACTOR COMMENTS p LAND USE COMPATIBILITY / U 5 a. Comprehensive Plan: 1985 Comprehensive Development Plan has placed this area within a Neighborhood Conservation land use category. The proposed use is inconsistent with the land use plan policies and map. Appropriate designation for proposed land use is Transition. Note accompanying land use plan amendment request for a Transition designation. 3 b. Surrounding Land: Proposed development immediately adjoins established single family subdivision. The 50 foot wide strip zoned R-1, running along the entire easterly portion of the petitioner's property and bordering the subdivision will be left undisturbed. 3 c. Neighboring Area: Existing residential subdivision, office complex, and dense commercial development. 2 d. Site Layout: Access is from Brambleton Avenue, traffic will not affect neighboring residential area. Proffer offered to protect existing tree cover. N/A e. Architecture: 3 3 3 2 f. Screening and Landscape: As per ordinance. Proffer offered to protect existing tree cover as is possible. g. Amenities: Proffer that lighting fixtures will not exceed 14 feet in height and• will be directed away from residential properties. h. Natural Features: Existing slope and heavy tree cover. i. ? j. TRAFFIC Street Capacities: Improvements to Brambleton Avenue almost complete. Project will not generate any additional traffic. However, parking lot will accommodate anticipated needs arising from proposed expansion of existing office building. Circulation: Adequate circulation as shown on concept plan. Engineering requests roads to be at least 24 feet wide. The project would use existing access road. UTILITIES 2 k. Water: Adequate source and distribution. ? 1. Sewer: Adequate treatment and transmission. DRAINAGE ? m. Basin: No problems noted. Drainage will be accommodated by Brambleton Avenue improvements. N/A n. Floodplain: - 5 - PUBLIC SERVICES /~~a 2 0. Fire Protection: Within established service standard. ? p. Rescue: Within established service standard. N/A q. Parks and Recreation: N/A r. School: TAX BASE 1 s. - Land and Improvement Value: Land is currently owned by petitioners. Value of proposed parking lot is unknown at this time. Parking lot expansion will support existing businesses. Taxable Gross Sales/Year: Not applicable. - Total Employees: Not applicable. - Total revenue to the County/Year: Not applicable. ENVIRONMENT ? t. Air: ? u. Water: ? v. Soils: ? w. Noise: 2 x. Signage: Not specified; however, it is not anticipated that additional signage will be needed or installed. 6. PLAN CONSISTENCY This area is designated as Neighborhood Conservation. The proposed office use is not consistent with either the plan policies or map. The appropriate designation for the proposed use is Transition. 7. STAFF EVALUATION a. Strengths: (1) Proposal complies with shared access, shared parking, and limits the frequency of driveway openings. (2) Quality of highway f rontage development will not be diminished. (3) Specific use and concept plan has been proffered. b. Weaknesses: (1) Proposed map amendment would be in conflict with Neighborhood Conservation land use designation. Rezoning approval should only follow the amendment of the Land Use Plan Map to the Transition land use category. -6- VIRGINIA: r~ BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY A portion of Lots 12, 13, i4 ) c~.I"l d 15 , Ma ~.l O ;k~ ; C. <,,.,-~: ,,, :' c, i ~ . = C; i" ': - . ; generally located at the rear 1 ~} f ~' '~ ~ ^:ramb.l ~~t on Avenue , ) S.jR'. , within trae Cave Spring ) FINAL ORDER Ma~i~.ter~±~~~. Dis;tric:t, and ) Recorr~i~ . TO TfIE F30NORAEiI~E SUPERVI`;'ORS C?~' ~;r'~A~;<<,r~,F~ C;7t?:A''i'~': WHEREAS, your Pe~titionea: , 33r.amnleton Medica'_. . _, sso~~~ate~, ;.~~ ,_ . ,.. , , t! ; ~~ r ._ . , ,. ~ _ r . , ~ _~, ~ ~ f C Y t ..._ r'e:~~~rQ ale ~..?-~cve reff~x~encr~d Nar;~f~i of land from R-1 ~.•~+ • _ - i p, ~ ,, , ,... , ~~. .-,. ~. _: ~ . - - i a fami?.y prar~r_ice medical and health care facility; anc' WNE°REAS, a:i t~~r• clue lgagal riot ice, tL±-- I'3tzsrt.~n.g Commission did hold a public hearing of the petition oil Z12G2m~~E'Y' ~, ~~9~~i ret Ca?~'1'ir;' _ .~ ~:i,_C-t'cz~ ._ ~'ti.r~ci. were ~ 1Vf'. -.__ ;~~,~:~r~rt'.:li }-y ±L. )-. ,- ar ~ ,-J:' _. ,.~ i;P 6J~?:F;REA:~ , at t-kaS~ fi~.l ~t r~n.c:~~= icy- .:,' c,- CO1?nty S~zpervisors rxetc~yr:ined that t}lE rezor~zrg !~e appr„~.,ec7 2S Y'eC~~iE'St~C';. MOW, TF?ERFFORr, SSE I"' C~~?r,~F;,~',-~ +~,-+ ._~- _ _ ..: .. ~.. l E' afc~rement_ioned par.ce~. cif J.and, which is contained in rile fic>actoke County Tax Maps as Pax~r.E~1 ~To . ; SeF~ at ci--~czc~c~) , <-,r.~,' - 7 - i~ reCOrC~e(~ ].n TlF?Nr' R. ~'.- 1.~^~' ;;~' D~JP ti" ' '!"c1 i ~ , desc:~r.ik~ed below, ~~e r°evc~rapd fz•n;rr', =;.-~ Ia.i;tit~•ac~t ~~ vi-1 Listrict. L,er~a'. ~PS~ _i z~, ~ , c~ c;t l,e,~t t, . Being al]. of Lots ? 2 , 1 ~~ , '- ^ a„i~ ; h Map ~~,~ h;.~ F•r: r. _. ' ~. , ~L:. ~ - -, ~ ~-, >f ~~eco?~~d ir, tie `_ _F ~'~ ''S t~¢f j-c P o` t-.,e`J '~ _.:!" C" ~: ~~. ~ ~ . r; i l :-~ "- C. ~' r7 Y' t Yl E=? ~'. (.) 7 t' ~] r? .c '~ 1:r1 ri'~'i * Y,r`, . - _ ..... -. P ^, '~!. Y, car' - -... - ~-- .... i~ _ - - .. ' ~ ' - - _ -- _. - _, ., _ the pa ~';.'_1g ~sr-_ '..? `~ lY i ` 1. .,. ?. ..- ~_ _ .-. _ . ~ ~ ' vi ~y 1 __-.. ~ . --.,a _ ... ~, , : , i -ice rj i r- ; cir! i t?S' ~ C ;_ ,.~ _ t'r, ~ * ti, n 1-, ~, ,' --- ' °~J =i' ~ -r ~ - .. - 8 - /~'~, _ ~ a Y' E ~ ... r i -9- •• " 1 . , .._ _ .. r, .. . _ _... ., .. ._t. ~ . _ ,.... T' T;.\?~~ i1 '~~~, C VV ~'`rl 11~1Y~. tiles 1.~C. ~i~ ~L):. i. .~ . r` F , ,.., ._.. ...~.. ..._....... ~ ..... 1 .. ..._ _ .._ _...,.__,.,...~. __ r c l .., r ..__,,_ ,..._ _ t n,T ""--.~' ' Y .............: I .. l .. 1 t ! ~~ t .. ~ :: 1 ~. ~. .. ~ __ L..!_. _. _ ... .. .._ _ .. .. ,.. ., r _ }~G~ t _• 1 .. ~.. ..~; T..?r~T _ ... ... y _ . .. .. ...~~.. _ - Y l ~_ .... ~.:F_ .. .. .._ ~. ... -' 1 _ x " ' =°~~' i 3~_'y =~ - f 'deed ~~~_'' 1~~. , ,:,t P~.~e ~.. - ,~ f~~•f~~~~_ ,_ __ .. T~ ~ < + + P. . t' 'f` 1 r' 1 D1.StY'? C'L . x - 3 ~- y ,``,J'~~ .. ~. . 4 ~_ __ c7 ~ .. - 1 . ^ ~ i f ~ r =. r y f t fr~ ~ ~iC~ ~~~~-~r_ `~E '~- ( {~ r l 4 _i_ fib ~~1`nT ~:J {~:....... ...i.rrit.. _, ~ ... ., 5' , . _... _ ~ .. _ G , ...... t ` . ...... .1 _ i ,7.. 1 ~.. ~fi_ } .,.;~. ,. ... y. CAL _ _ ~ ~s., ir~ e.. r ...., ,, A..1 ..tom .:._.` ._.._ _ _ . ~ .~ ., ~ 1 i ,~ ~ ~~••~. ,mot, +-~~ ~zc~ ~ _.. _ .. fey ~.~~ ~:~ ~,~;^t:al2~ f ~r~1_.. _r t}l~ lllt 1`7 _ ,i f `,1i~ ~,,1.,~ , 4. }~F, ~, ~ ~ t ," ~. _ .. , ______ _ _.__.__ _._.__ ._.---__ _._. -~ ' ~-. r. _ ~. _,~~. _.,_~ ~, -_ :.... ~. y..` _ .. ?vA~_' - ~. , . _ _._ _ __. ;,, Bgp,MBLETON MEDICAL ASSOCIATES Tax Map Numbers Part of Lot 12 77. 10-2-11 Part of Lot 13 77. 10-2-12 Part of Lot 14 77. 10-2-13 Part of Lot 15 77. 10-2-14 p, p p E A R A N C E R E Q U E S T PUBLIC HEARING ON ~-~`" ..~.~ k a I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so that I may comment. I agree to follow the guidelines listed below. WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. 1. Each speaker will have between three and five minutes available whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. 2. Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. 3. All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. 4. Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times . 5. Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. 6. INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. P L E A S E W R I T E L E G I B L Y NAME . ~..~"`'~~ ,,.°. , r ~! ,~~ :~ ADDRESS: PHONE: PLEASE NOTE: (After filling out, give to the Deputy Clerk. Thank you.) p, p p E A R A N C E R E Q U E S T ~ ~~- ~~ rUnLIC EE?,RING I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so that I may comment. I agree to follow the guidelines listed below. WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. 1. Each speaker will have between three and five minutes available whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the~time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. 2. Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. 3. All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. 4. Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times . 5. Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. 6. INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. P L E A S E W R I T E L E G I B L Y Nr,ME ADDRESS: PHONE: V<~~~~~~~ ~ ~~~~~ -~~ s ~~~ PLEASE NOTE: (After filling out, give to the Deputy Clerk. Thank you.) J p, p P E A R A N C E PUBLIC HEARING ON ~ I U R E Q U E S T ~=' _ ~ .__ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so that I may comment. I agree to follow the guidelines listed below. WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. 1. Each speaker will have between three and five minutes available whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. 2. Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. 3. All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. 4. Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times . 5. Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. (. INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. P L E A S E W R I T E L E G I B L Y NAME: ADDRESS: PHONE: PLEASE NOTE: (After filling out, give to the Deputy Clerk. Thank you.) ~~ / ~' A p p E A R A N C E AR E Q U E S `~' PUBLIC HEARING ON `'~ ~~ ' ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ I would like the Chairman of the Board o~~Supervisors to recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so that I may comment. I agree to follow the guidelines listed below. WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ~~ ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. 1. Each speaker will have between three and five minutes available whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking onthe majoritynof will enforce the rule unless instructed by the Board to do otherwise. 2. Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. 3. All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. 4. Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times . 5. Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. (. INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITHTHEEINDIVIDUALTTONREPRESENTATHEM,FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING P L E A S E W R I T E L E G I B L Y NAME: ADDRESS: PHONE: . , .a ~ , .% PLEASE_NOTE: (After filling out, give to the Deputy Clerk. Thank you.) _._ --~,T,_. n~' ~ r'~~ aTI!`1 Z~` ^TTZj'T"i ii ~ r)F2 , a ,~ , (, _~ L F~ %~' t Y~ ~ -. ,~ ,., F- ~,. ,:.. .: _ .. - - - ~ r~.•. ..... _ .. .._ _ .. J . _. _ : . _- - - R~rnr~r,~~?~ _~ _ -- . i~~' ~:°. _ _ ~ _ _ ~ __. .. - - _ - - _. _. ... ;.i -- s ~ - k .. .. ` .. ~ 'Ti ~r ~;_ .. _ l _ - __ - .. '.' .y .. - r~ _ t' _ v; . ,.~ ~ , r,~ 1 r, F _~ - _ F '" _ 1 1 ~ !", ~ m i -r - . _. WF3ER~A~ , ~-,. ~ y,~ - ~ ~ _ ,, . , •-,}TAI ~ )" :: _, ~ ~ r'I ~, r-. ~ _ _ _ .'1 r- . , ' 'i 1 ~ .. ' ' ~' .. ~ J _ . ~ :tL ~ -mot it~. .. y .. .. ~ 'l ~ ..... t ~. .. _. wer r. ~~ - ~, ~. ~r~ tE>s: e~: t ` -r:~~; _ `.J rn 1 . _ F ' ' J ' ~ .. _ .. j,~T7 ~ ' T j . . s . .~ ... .. i.! .. ... ... ~ ... - - ,_. - y. ..: t r,i- , T~IEREFORF, , t`" _ _,: - ,r .x. ~ - '",r ~ ~.. ~., ;, .. _. - - is __ - , _ .. .. l .. - ~- ~ 1 ~ ~~ ~ '~ ~ n .ter' r ''r' Y_ _. .-, T. r ._ _. ` c , T1 ~ ,7 _ M chael ., S «~ ~'- -' - ~ TC~TlE?~ ~?Tl~ G~z_1...7 .. C~o?~dozi , ~ R . 7'? - -- ^, ~ Y <_ _ ' Pc.-`~ c ~ ~ rc, .. -' i ,,, *-~~ Fz7 r~r rr.'' J ''",C)T:?Ylc;c 'r ... f mil ~ _ _._ ,-: BRAMBLETON MEDICAL ASSOCIATES Tax Map Numbers 12 77.10-2-11 Part of Lot 13 77.10-2-12 Part of Lot Part of Lot 14 77.10-2-13 Part of Lot 15 77.10-2-14 NG OF TF~ R(aA~~ ~~ BOARD OF SUp~ISORS L~ NOTICE OF A R ME~I oke County Board of rsons that the Roan at the iven to all interested pe January 26- 1988, Notice is hereby g ublic hearing at 7 p•m• on Tuesday, in Roanoke, Supervisors will hold aistration Center, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, SW. Roanoke County Admen ests: tion Permit to operate an Virginia to hear the following requ.,.,__ L nn Pratt for a Special ExceP roximately 0,76 1, petition of Randyrd Ylo~ted isterial raveya on the east side of Ront~rie C pa ba Mag autamblle g mile north of its intersection with Route 31 se noke County Land U District. nd the ROa hborhood Teton Medical Associates to arne 2. Petition of Bramb designation of a 1.48 acre tract from Neig Future Land Use map south of 3142 Brambleton Plan: located immediately Conservation to Transiti~o~nglsterial District. 48 acre tract from ve Spring Avenue in the ~ ~ - located Teton Medical Associates to rezone a of Bramb arking lot, 3• petition construct a p magisterial 1 Business to in the Cave Spring R_1, Residential to B- ~ Teton Avenue immediately south of 3142 Bramb rtment of District. ection in the Depa Roanoke Virginia. 1 laps and ordinances are availabl°ri AvenueSpRoanoke, Tic Al P 3738 Bramble 600, to attend Planning and Zoning, Rocco ersons desiring to handicappe p will p office of Personnel County rovide assistance ested to contact the County hearings. Such individuals are revisions are needed for attendance. Services 703/772-2018 if special p iven under my hand this 6th day of January- 1988" G _ ?~• wry Allen, Deputy Clerk rvisors Roanoke County Board of Supe please publish: Evening ~lition Roanoke Times & World-N~s January 12, 1988 January 19, 1988 please bill: County of Roanoke & Zoning pepartxcient of Planning P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 w PETITIONER: BRAMBLETON MIDICAL ASSOCIATES CASE NC~~BER: 43-11/87 ~~ ~_~~~ c. ~.; Planning Commission Hearing Date: November 5, 1987 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: January 26, 1988 1. RD~UEST Petition of Brambleton Medical Associates to amend the Roanoke County Land Use Plan: Future Land Use map designation of a 1.48 acre tract from Neighborhood Conservation to Transition, located immediately south of 3142 Brambleton Avenue in the Cave Spring Magisterial District. 2. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION Neighboring residents voiced the following concerns at the Planning Commission Public Hearing: the request conflicts with the future land use map designation and violates established land use principles; potential devaluation of property. 3. SIGNIFICANT IMPACT FACTORS a. None. 4. PROFFERED CONDITIONS a. Not applicable. 5. OODM4ISSIONER'S MOTION, VOTE AND REASON Mr. Witt moved to approve the petition. roll call vote: AYES: Flippen, Witt, Gordon NAYS: Jones, Winstead ABSENT: None 6. DISSENTING PII2SPECTIVE a. None given. 7. ATTACHI~NTS Concept Plan (8~" x 11") Vicinity Map (8~" x 11") ~ Staff Report Other: The motion carried with the following Robert Sta zer, Planning Commission Secretary /8~- STAFF REPORT CASE NUMBER: REVIEWED BY: 43-11/87 ROB STALZER Petition of Brambleton Medical Land Use Plan: Future Land Use from Neighborhood Conservation of 3142 Brambleton Avenue in the PETITIONER: BRAMBLETON MEDICAL ASSOC. DATE: OCTOBER 27, .1987 Associates to amend the Roanoke County map designation of a 1.48 acre tract to Transition, located immediately south Cave Spring Magisterial District. 1. NATURE OF REQUEST a. Request to amend the Future Land Use Plan Map from Neighborhoo Conservation to Transition. 2. PERMITTED LAND USE TYPES a. Existing: Neighborhood Conservation encourages single family attached and detached housing, neighborhood activity centers. b. Proposed: Transition permits office and institutional uses, retail uses, multifamily residential uses, single family attached uses, and parks. 3. PLAN CONSISTENCY a. Current designation: Neighborhood Conservation. b, Appropriate designation for proposed use: Transition. c. Analysis: Office use is etitponerthas proposed tolamendhthe Conservation area. The p land use plan map to Transition. The justification offered is as follows: highway frontage of office complex and direct access to Brambleton Avenue; slope and orientate onf °ad j ac e n t towards Brambleton Avenue; business zoning properties; existence of the urban services; and presence of existing office development. 4. STAFF EVALUATION a. Strengths: (1) Land use detsurroundingfla d wusefrt pogeraphy, use pattern, existing zoning, and urban sector are in existence. b. Weaknesses: (1) Some land use types that are desirable within Transition land use areas such as retai~o uriate on thgs site ity multifamily residential uses are not app p -2- 1~ -,- i ~~ ,~ r _ :. ~__: :~ ~_-j . - 4 - BRAMBLETON MEDICAL ASSOCIATES Tax Map Numbers 77.10-2-4 Part of Lot 7 77.10-2-6 Part of Lot 8 77.10-2-7 Part of Lot 9 77.10-2-8 Part of Lot 10 77.10-2-10 Part of Lot 11 77.10-2-11 Lot 12 77'10-2-12 Lot 13 77.10-2-13 Lot 14 77.10-2-14 • Lot 15 - •- - _ Wit. __ . t. _. i ... _. -_ ~ - _ f ~lI H ~ .. R. rP -~ ~ '.i _ _ -. _ :, _ _ _ _ ~ . _ ~? see attached , .. ,.i ... 1 :. .. _ ~. ,.-. _. ,. :. ~ . • .f. -. ~- ... ~. z _' - if :~~.~ 1',. _ _,.. __"' .. .,. 1" _, ~,~ _ _ . _ _ . ~ _ ~ _ _ _, . _ .. _ ,, November II ._., 5 : ~ _ _ _ . _ _ ~ -: :: . _ , ... - ~t_ - ~__ _ - - - - _- - -- - _, _~ y -- - r ~- ,_, ., ~.,, -. 1 ,_ _ ~.. -- .yt t -- - ~ _..... _ .. .. ._ ._. CE OF A REC~(JLAR ~I~ OF THE ROANOKE ~'~ ~~ OF SUPERVISOR-' LEIGAL NOTI oke County Board of iven to all interested persons that the Roan Notice is hereby g January 26, 1988, at the lic hearing at 7 p.m• on Tuesday. Supervisors will hold a pub in Roanoke, ke County Administration Center, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, SW, Roano Virginia to hear the following requests: rate an I, nn Pratt for a Special Exception Permit to ope 1, Petition of Randy Y roximately 0.76 autanobile graveyard, located on the east side of Route 740 aPP isterial ile north of its intersection with Route 311 in the Catawba Mag m District. Land Use ition of Brambleton Medical Associates'to amend the ~n f r m N ghborhood 2. Pet Plan: Future Land Use map designation of a 1.48 acres uth of 3142 Brambleton Conservation to Transition, located immediately rin Magisterial District. Avenue in the Cave Sp g of Brambleton Medical` Associates to rezone a 1' n8 lot trlocat d 3. Petition arks g R-1, Residential to B-1, Business to construct a P rin Magisterial immediately south of 3142 Brambleton Avenue in the Cave Sp g District. ection in the Department of All plans and ordinances are availebon AvenueSpRoanoke, Virginia. Roanoke and Zoning, Ram 600, 3738 Brambl to attend public Planning ed ersons desiring County will provide assistance to handicapp P office of Personnel ested to contact the County hearings. Such individuals are r~u ervices 703/772-2018 if special provisions are needed for attendance. S of January, 1988. Given under my hand this 6th day ?~ . Mary Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors please publish: Evening Edition Roanoke Times & World-news January 12, 1988 January 19, 1988 Please bill: County of Roanoke & Zoning Departstient of Planning P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 i8~-~ SPRIrT(,•Va00D ASSOCIA`I'~ PETI'I'IONE~t: 1_1/88 CASE NUMBER: Date: January 5, 1988 Planning Com¢nission Hearing Date. January 26, 1988 Board of Supervisors Hearing Associates for a Use Not Provided For permit to operate an 1, R~UEST ringwood Petition of SP s located at 3513 Brambleton Avenue in the Windsor Hil s oil change busines , Magisterial District. ssion 2, CITIZEN PARTICIPATION concerns at the Planning C~1 the Farey voiced the following lied with; Mr. and Mrs. Henry coffered conditions have not been cmmP ranee of the public Hearing: previously p r e number of vehicles stored at the location; the unsightly aP la g fence. ~p'~ FP'C~~ rehensive Develognent Plan has placed this area 3, SIGNIFICANT es eneral retail uses s. Comprehensive Plan: 1985 Came o which discourag g licies ro sed. General retail use is contradictory o within a Transition land use categ ~' tition to rezone and to amend such as the one P 1JONote that the Previous pe 1~ TR-2, and TR-3. constrained. conditions were also rated a 4 in this caengoa Ce• Site is very b, Site Layout: Proposal will use existing ' ions roff eyed in 1985 and amended. in 1987 will remain in effec , 4. PRO~'ERED CONDITIONS a, The Condit P for a period plus -- u on the property outside of the building b. No vehicle will stay P exceeding 72 hours- ro rt or mechanics ewor e lltreesdas defined i p the•zoning ordinance will be c. ~ ~J d. A row of small ev gro rty by May 1- 1988. of the fence. planted on the Faery p Pe, level with the top e, The fence posts will be trimmed so as to be 5, CONYKISSIONER' S MOTION, V~th~ e~~on with proffered conditions. The motion Mr . W i tt moved to deny roll call vote- carried with the following • AYES; Witt, Jones NAYS: Flippen ABS~7T; None ABSTAIN: Gordon, Winstead on the basis that the zoning ordinance, as 6, DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE a. ~. Winstead abstained from Ming allows for an oil change busi~rdon interpreted by the Zoning Administrator, iced. ~'• a Use Not Provided For Permit is no r n noted that the and therefore, revious history of the case and indicated that he was unfamiliar from voting. Mrs- Flippe therefore he would be abstaining Well maintained and therefore she Magic Lube located in her area is clean, would be voting for the petition. 7. ATTAC~NTS ,~ Concept Plan (8~" x 11") Vicinity Map (8~" x 11") Staff Report Other: lzer, Planning C~nission Secretary Robert S ~ I ~" W • '~ u ~•~ w, ~ O N ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t ~ ~ O 2 t F- = o ti e .~ /~ ~ „a, ~' i N ~ W J ' ~ f ~ .R I I Cif I a- i ~ i v. ~ r __ ~ ~ I I C~ ~ ' 1 W N g ~ I ~ ~ I .~Z i i cy+ _~ ~~., 2 `~ ~ ^T GYM :, _. ~ jl ! 34g1 ?i a S~ '_ ~~ -2- r~ M L U s8 ~- D un~ru ..., .... R I y L . ~ ~ 17 ~~ ~~ ~lNEV ~~- Road ~ ~~ 20p 18 J ~ e , I I = ~ ~ ~ I R' ~ Is ''- ter. I ~ •~l I I ~ I 30 ~ 31 w ''_7 128 _ 29 I 32 33 ~ \ ~ - Z as°~ ~`~ / . e I IN ~ I.oOAC N 34 ~ 35 6 I I ~ R- I ~, i.oo n~ ~ - z I ~ I r~ .., '~ ~ ~ ~ „ o~ O ~ ~ • 3 ~ _ / 3 2 r ~ '. / 4 \ iJ ~.r / 5 ~ J \ R-3 +',,~ ~ s ~ \ ' ~:J rs a 6 as •, 2 z7 40 / , X4 \ ,, r J ry 26 _ \ r .0 a2 / 9 ' B-1 ~ ' rr 24. ro ~. 4a © P'~g - I I \ z I ~ 35' ` ~\ K~ I ' ' ' \ '~ ~ ~ ~ b ` Is .. wl dl' • ' ~ t ' ROANOKE COUNTY Springwood Associates :r DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT - 3 - Use Not Proved For ~,~ ,.,.: ~~~ - `~ STAFF REPORT CASE NUMBER: 1-1/88 PETITIONER: SPRINGWOOD ASSOCIATES REVIEWED BY: ROB STALZER DATE: DECEMBER 28, 1987 Petition of Springwood Associates for a Use Not Provided For permit to operate an oil change business, located at 3513 Brambleton Avenue in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District. 1. NATURE OF REQUEST a. Conditional request for a Use a one bay vehicle oil change existing building that is Commercial. Not Provided For Permit to operate and lubrication facility in an currently zoned B-2, General Springwood Associates/Valley Imported Parts rezoned a .606 acre tract referred to above in December, 1985. At that time, petitioner stated that the main use would be the retail sales of automobile parts. The applicant also stated that as an accessory use, parts sold by the business would be installed on the premises. Applicant proffered conditions in 1985 which were amended in December 1986, which are summarized as follows: (1) To amend the 1985 concept plan to allow for the construction of another retail building on the site. (2) To reduce the buffer zone on the western side of the property to ten feet and plant a row of pine trees. (3) The facility will not be used by the petitioner for major mechanical work or for automobile body work. (4) There will be no outside storage of vehicles. (5) The facility will not be used to conduct the sale of new or used automobiles. (6) The petitioner will install and maintain such screening as recommended by the Roanoke County Zoning Administrator. (7) The petitioner will install outside lighting in accordance with the recommendations and approval of the Roanoke County Zoning Administrator. (8) The petitioner agrees to comply with such sound emission regulations as may be promulgated by the Roanoke County Planning staff. Additionally, the petitioner agrees to take such action as necessary in order to reduce the noise level to no more than the level of businesses now existing in the immediate vicinity of the property sought to be zoned. The petitioner is offering two conditions that will limit the Use Not Provided For Permit: (1) No vehicle will stay upon the property outside of the building for a period exceeding seventy-two hours. (2) No major mechanical work will be done on the property. Petitioner's request for a Use Not Provided For Permit to operate a Magic Lube franchise focuses on two issues; the definition of major mechanical work and the distinction between a main and an accessory use. -4- .~. The definition of major mechanical work was established by the Board of Zoning Appeals in March 1987 subsequent to a request for clarification by the petitioner. The BZA defined major mechanical as including vehicles parts installation and/or service including and not limited to the following: engine rebuilding; overhaul or any other activities requiring the removal of the block assembly from the vehicle; and transmission overhauls. The BZA defined minor mechanical work as the installation of new tires and batteries. Chassis lubrication, engine oil change, engine oil filter replacement, the repacking of wheel bearings and the replacement of lubrication seals were classified as general mechanical tasks that would be permitted in the building. The applicant has stated that in the past, Valley Imported Parts changed oil in approximately 15-20 vehicles per week and that Magic Lube would change oil and fluids in approximately 15-20 vehicles per day. The applicant has emphasized that in the past customers left their vehicles all day whereas with the Magic Lube franchise, the customers will be serviced with a no wait, drive-thru facility. The zoning ordinance and the conditions do not specify the number of oil changes to be performed on the property during a specified time period. Further, the conditions do not specify what business, i.e., Valley Imported Parts or Magic Lube, will eventually change oil on the property. In accordance with the Code of Virginia Sect. 15.1-491.2 and the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance Sect. 21-105 (e)(6), a condition that is not related to the physical development or physical operation of the property, such, as ownership, is not proper or enforceable. In addition, a precedent has been set at Tanglewood Mall with the transfer of ownership of the automobile service facility located at the north end of the mall property from JC Penney to Firestone. The transition took place in March, 1983. The change of ownership did not prevent a different operator from performing essentially the same type of service. During the original rezoning that was approved in December 1985, the installation of parts was represented to the Board of Supervisors and the Planning Commission as an accessory use. Sect. 21-20 of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance defines accessory use as a subordinate use, customarily incidental to and located upon the same lot occupied by the main use. The main use of the property will continue to be the retail sale of automobile parts. Vehicle lubrication and oil change will continue to be a subordinate use, even though this use will be owned and operated by a different business. b. Attached concept plan and vicinity maps describe concept more fully. 2. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS a. Site plan review not required. No external modifications will be made to the building or parking areas. b. VDOT permit not required. c. B-2 zoning category permits a wide variety of commercial uses. Conditions restrict uses that may be conducted on the property. Use Not Provided Permit will allow only vehicle lubrication facility as proposed to operate. - 5 - _ ____._ /~ 3. SITE CHARACTERISTICS a. Topography: Flat. b. Ground Cover: Existing buildings and pavement. 4. AREA CHARACTERISTICS a. Future Growth Priority: Situated within the Windsor Hills Community Planning Area; designated as a stable growth area. Currently served by urban services. b. General area abuts US 221 and adjoins existing commercial and lower density residential development. S. LAND USE IMPACT ASSESSMENT Rating: Rate each factor according to the impact of the proposed action. Use a scale of 1 through 5. 1 = positive impact, 2 = negligible impact, 3 = manageable impact, 4 = disruptive impact, 5 = severe impact, and N/A = not applicable. RATING FACTOR COMMENTS LAND USE COMPATIBT_LITY 4 a. Comprehensive Plan: 1985 Comprehensive Development Plan has placed this area within a Transition land use category which discourages general retail uses such as the one proposed. General retail use is contradictory to policies TR-l, TR-2, and TR-3. Note that the previous petition to rezone and to amend conditions were also rated a 4 in this category. 3 b. Surrounding Land: Low density residential as well as existing strip development and heavily traveled primary highway. 3 c. Neighboring Area: Parcel abuts heavily traveled highway. Neighboring area primarily mixed strip commercial and existing low density residential. 4 d. Site Layout: Proposal will use existing entrance. Site is very constrained. 2 e. Architecture: Existing structure will accommodate proposed use. 2 f. Screening and Landscaping: No change in current requirements. 2 g. Amenities: No change in current parking requirements. 2 h. Natural Features: No additional effect. TRAFFIC 3 i. Street Capacities: Served by major arterial highway US 221. Anticipate low to moderate ADT (fewer than 100 vehicle trip ends). US 221 currently carries approximately 22,000 vehicles per day. Improvements to road recently completed. 3 j. Circulation: Direct access to heavily traveled major arterial highway. Single entrance will continue to serve property and both buildings on site. - 6 - ~~~_ UTILITIES 2 k. Water: Adequate supply and distribution. 2 1. Sewer: Adequate treatment and transmission. DRAINAGE 2 m. Basin: No negative effect. 2 n. Floodplain: No negative effect. , PUBLIC SERVICES 2 0. Fire Protection: Within established service standard. 2 p. Rescue: Within established service standard. N/A q. Parks and Recreation: N/A r. School: 1 TAX BASE s. - Land and Improvement Value: No change - Taxable Gross Sales/Year: $100,000 - Total Employees: 3 - Total revenue to the County/Year: Approximately $1,000 sales tax revenue in addition to existing real property revenues. ' ENVIRONMENT 2 t. Air: 2 u. Water: 2 v. Soils: 2 w. Noise: 3 x. Signage: 6. PLAN CONSISTENCY This area is designated as a Transition land use category. The general commercial is a discouraged use. This proposal is not consistent with either the land use types or the defined policies within the Transition land use category. However the proposed use is not different in character from any of the uses that have been conducted on the property to date. 7. STAFF EVALUATION a. Strengths: (1) Proposal will use existing building and will eliminate many of the vehicles parked on the property during the day and overnight. (2) Adjoins recently improved major arterial highway. b. Weaknesses: (1) Proposal does not conform with land use types or policies. (2) Traffic generation will be increased. (3) Proffers limiting outside storage of vehicles should be more restrictive, i.e., there will be no outdoor, overnight parking of customers' vehicles (licensed or unlicensed) after closing each day. -7- VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY i8~- ~q A ,~~_ acre parcel of land, ) generally located ~~~ Brambleton > Avenue, S. W. ) PROFFER within the Windsor Hills ) OF Magisterial District, and ) CONDITIONS recorded as parcel # 77.09-4-'~7A ) in the Roanoke County Tax Records. ) TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY: c~ c~ ~-- 0 U 0 ~--- 0 w 0 c. Being in accord with Sec. 15.1-491.1 et seq. of the Code of Virginia and Sec. 21-1O5E of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance, the Petitioner Sprin~Qd. Associates hereby voluntarily proffers to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia the following conditions to the rezoning of the above-referenced parcel of land: 1. No vehicle will stay upon the property outside of the building for a period exceeding seventy-two hours. 2. No major mechanical work will be done on the property. 3. A row of small evergreen trees as defined in the zoning ordinance will be planted on the Faery property by May 1, 1988. 4. The fence posts will be trimmed so as to be level with the top of the fence . NOTE: THE CONDITIONS PROFFERED IN 1985 AND AMENDED IN 1987 WILL REMAIN IN EFFECT. Respectfully submitted, ~~ Pet loner tz-3o-~7 - 10 - ~ ~ .~. VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROp,NOKE COUNTY acre parcel of land, ~ A '~_ ~ located ~~1~=^'~'~ °+cr generally ~ ,ll s ~ within the ,n ' „a ^r H' - Magisterial District, and reel # '~~ 09-~-~7A ~ recorded as Pa . in the Roanoke County Tax Records. a~ LL• 0 U 0 F-- Q 0 w 0 a. a. Q FINAL ORDER TO THE HONORABLE StJp~~SORS OF ROANOKE COUDfI'Y = WHEREAS, yon Petitioner S ri ood. Associates arcel or a se ~t~e aboVeereferenced p Supervisors ~~~~~e did petition the Board of County xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx~iX~'~tx ~ currently zoned P-2 District ~~ erati an oil chan e and.lube business for the purpose of o Commission did hold a public WHEREAS, after due legal notice, the PlanniQg at which time, all parties hearing of the petition on - iven an opportunity to 'oe heard; and in interest were g rd of County Supervisors determined ;n~ERFAS, after full consideration, the Boa that the rezoning be a roved 1 26 88 RE BE IT ORDERED that the aforenc-entioned parcel of land, which is NOW, THEREFO - 0 ~-37A and recorded contained in the Roanoke County Tax Maps as Parcel 77. 9- xfx~st Page 1=_ and legally described below, be ~~ in Deek Book 1225 x xxi~~~xxxxxxxxxxxxx~c.~~x~oxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;:~~:~e .xxx _~_____` -8- ~9a1 Description of property: ,'e~~ BEGINNING at an iron pin located Brambleton Avenue, S•y~• on the northerl being corner to the propert S• Route 221), said Pointe °f Book 32, page 498 Y of Charlotte Hesle Brambleton Avenue,'S thence with the northerl P (Wl~l iron pin, corner to 58° 00~ 00~~ W• 166.4 feetlto an Map; thence Lot 15 of D. B. and Ella B, Lot 15 leaving Brambleton Ferguson N. 32° 00, 00„ Avenue and with the line of line of Lot 17; thence with6theeet to an iron E• 8.32 feet to line of Lot 17P1N,o58°h00' the line of Lot Wn iron pin corner to distances: S. 80°2 the followin Lot ~'~-2% thence with 48 00 g two courses and and N. 03° 37' 07" E. 41.4 feetltoganeet to an iron pin 58 00' 00" Hesle P E' 98.4 feet to iron pin; thence N. 5g 00 Pro erty; thence with thelHesleln corner to the ~~ E- 165.02 feet to an P Property, S. 30° side of Brambleton Avenue iron pin on the northerly_ THE PLACE OF BEGINNING; and CONTAINING 0,606 acres and bein shown on lot g as more P of survey made by Buford T•particularly 1985, Lumsden & Associates, P.C,, Engineers-Surveyors, dated , and August 29~ BEING the same property conveyed to Springwood Associ a Virginia General Partnershi Corporation g• P, by deed from Bane International and recorded anVthe1Clerk~spOfficenof dated August 28, 1985 Roanoke County, Virginia, in Deed the Circuit Court of~ Book 1225, page 1136. BE IT FURTHER ORpII~D that a co of the planning Commission and that ~ of this order be transmitted to official zonin be directed to reflect that changeonetth g ~P of Roanoke County, e ADOPTED on motion of Supervisor Garrett Supervisor Robers following recorded vote: ~ seconded by and uoon the Ate' Supervisors Garrett ~yS: Johnson, McGraw, Robers Abstain ~: Supervisor Nickens Roanoke County Bcx~rd of gu Clerk cc: Real Estate Assessor Pervisors Development Review Coordinator Director of Planning -9- VIRGINIA: BEE'ORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY A - '3= acre parcel of land, ) generally located 3513 Brambletion ) Avenue S . W . ) ) ~pATION within the Windsor Hills Magisterial District, and ) recorded as parcel # 77.09-~-37A ) in the Roanoke County Tax Records. 'PO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY: our Petitioner Springwood. Associates or a se,~ Provides WHEREAS, y hh ~ e Secretary to the Planning Commission a petition ~xxxnce~xr~~ x~x currently zoned R-2 District Fpr Perini t ~orh ~e above-referenced parcel of land fx oil change and. .,.,.,,,,,vyYUXXxxxxxxxxxxxxxx~~ for the purpose of x~9c Tube business WHEREAS, the petition was referred to the Planning Commission which, after due legal notice as required by Section 15.1-431 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as xxx ; and amended, did hold a public hearing on January 5, 1988 x19c WHEREAS, at that public hearing all parties in interest were afforded an opportunity to be heard; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due consideration has recomrinended to the Board of County Supervisors that the nexx~c~ request for a Use ilot Provided F Pe mit be denied. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission recommends to the Board of County Supervisors that the above-referenced parcel of land not be Use P~ t Provided For Permit and upon the The above action was adopted on motion of Mr. Witt following recorded vote: Aye; ~ditt, Jones Npyg; F1 i peen ABSENT: Pone Respectfully submitted, AgSTAIPI : Gordon , Winstead ~~ ~'d^ Rob Stalzer, Secretary Roanoke County Planningr Commission L E G A L N O T I C E iven to all interested persons that the ublic hearing at their Notice is hereby g ervisors will hold a p January 26, 1988- in Roanoke County Board of Sup m, on Tuesday- session beginning at 7:00 P• Administration Center, 3738 evening etition of the Community Room at the Roanoke Coun Y on the p S,W,, Roanoke, Virginia, For permit of a Brambleton Avenue, uesting a Use Not Provided Brambleton Springwood Associates, req ct of land containing 0.32 acre and located at 351 tra isterial District. Avenue in the Windsor Hills Mag erate an oil change and lube Rezoning has been requested to op s, The County Planning Commission recommends denial. busines and amendments of the Zoning Ordinance of Roanokelanunand other A Copy of the petition, site p be examined in the office of the thereto as well as a copy uest may the Roanoke County documents related to ment,rlocated in Room 600 at Department of Develop Administration Center. ed persons will provide assistance to handicapp uested to Roanoke County s, Such individuals a772r2018) if desiring to attend public hearing tact the County office of Persfo~eattendance,<<703] con special provisions are necessary 1988. Given under my hand this 7th day of January, ~~~~:~~ Deputy Clerk Mary H. Allen, ervisors Roanoke County Board of Sup please publish TimeseandeWorldeNews~on~ of the Roanoke Tuesday, January 12, 1988 Tuesday, January 19, 1988 Direct the bill for Publication to: Springwood Associates 3214 Electric Rd. Suite 200 Roanoke, Virginia 24018 /8~'-,~~ STAFF REPORT CASE NUMBER- SE1-1/88 PETITIONER: Randy L. Pratt REVIEWED BY: Jon Hartley~~ DATE: January 13, 1988 J Petition of Randy Lynn Pratt for a Special Exception Permit to operate an automobile graveyard, located on the east side of Route 740 approximately 0.76 mile north of it's intersection with Route 311 in the Catawba Magisterial District. 1. NATURE OF REQUEST a. Request for a Special Exception Permit to operate an automobile graveyard in an A-1 Agricultural District for his personal use. Petitioner has filled the request for a special exception pursuant to a Notice of Violation and Order to Correct a violation of section 21-21-1-A-23 of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance. b. By personal use, Mr. Pratt has indicated that the vehicles to be stored in the automobile graveyard would not be accessible to the public for the sale of used parts or vehicles. It is his intentions to collect only antique and near antique vintage cars in order to build a collection of antique vehicles. He has also indicated that he plans to build a building to house the inoperative motor vehicles. 2. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS a. An automobile graveyard can be operated in an A-1 district only after a special exception permit has been approved by the Board of Supervisors and in accordance with Chapter 6 of the Roanoke County Code.(See attachment) Specifically, an automobile graveyard means any lot or place exposed to the weather and upon which more than five (5) motor vehicles of any kind, incapable of being operated, and which it would not be economically practical to make operative, where junk vehicles, as defined in the ordinance, are placed, located or found. b. A permit from the Fire Marshal must be obtained pursuant to Article 20 of the fire codes of Roanoke County. c. If an auto graveyard provides used auto parts for sale, access must comply with VDOT standards for a commercial entrance. 3. SITE CHARACTERISTICS a. Topography: Property is situated at the top of a moderately steep ridge. b. Ground Cover: Property is wooded. 4. AREA CHARACTERISTICS a. Future Growth Priority: Situated within the Mason's Cove Community Planning Area designated for limited growth. 1 4M'~ .«n 4~ ~ b. General area is predominately rural residential with a number of houses in the immediate vicinity on lots of 10 or more acres. 5. LAND USE IMPACT ASSESSMENT Rating: Rate each factor according to the impact of the proposed action. Use a scale of 1 through 5. 1 = positive impact, 2 = negligible impact, 3 = manageable impact, 4 = disruptive impact, 5 = severe impact, and N/A = not applicable. RATING FACTOR COMMENTS LAND USE COMPATIBILITY 5 a. Comprehensive Plan: 1985 Comprehensive Development Plan has placed this area within a Rural Village. Petitioner's request does not conform with either the land use map or the defined policies within this land use category. Note that the Principal Industrial land use category, specifically Policy I-8, provides flexibility for certain industrial uses to locate outside the designated Principle Industrial areas. An automobile graveyard is not one of the stated industrial uses. 4 b. Surrounding Land: The property in the immediate vicinity is used for low density residential and woodlands. 3 c. Neighboring Area: Neighboring area is primarily low density residential and woodland. 2 d. Site Layout: Automobile graveyard would be located behind the petition's mobile home in an area approximately 80 ft. by 160 ft. Proposed area would be sufficient to house the 20 or more inoperative vehicles already on site, and could accommodate in excess of 60 vehicles. e. Architecture: N/A 2 f. Screening and Landscaping: Screening would have to comply with Section 6-6 of the Roanoke County Code. (See attachment) g. Amenities: N/A 4 h. Natural Features: Staff has expressed concern with potential for groundwater contamination from gasoline, motor oil, antifreeze, etc., particularly in an area dependent on individual wells. TRAFFIC 2 i. Street Capacities: Proposed use would have negligible impact on existing public road system. Petitioner's by way of a private road shared with ad'oinPnoperty is accessible (Due to terrain, four wheel drive vehicles are Pe~ommendednduring winter weather.) 3 J• Circulation: Vehicles will have to be towed or hauled several residences which share past will not be affected. Private road. Circulation pattern / 8 <._ ~~ UTILITIES 2 k. Water: Private system 2 1. Sewer: Private septic. DRAINAGE 4 m. Basin: See comments under Natural Features above. n. Floodplain: N/A PUBLIC SERVICES 3 0. Fire Protection: Precautions must be taken pursuant to sections 6-7, 6-11 and 6-12 of the Roanoke County Code and a permit must be obtained from the Fire Marshal. 3 p. Rescue: See comments above. q. Parks and Recreation: N/A r. Schools: N/A TAX BASE 3 s. - Land and Improvement Value: $18,400 - Taxable Gross Sales/Year: $0 - Total Employees: 0 - Total Revenue to the County/Year: Not Available. ENVIRONMENT 2 t. Air: 4 u. Water: See comments under Natural Features above. 2 v. Soils: 2 w. Noise: 3 x. Signage: None indicated 6. PLAN CONSISTENCY This area is designated as Rural Village. Petitioner's proposal is not consistent with the land use map or defined policies. 7. STAFF EVALUATION a. Strengths: (1) Will legalize an existing violation. (2) Would improve aesthetic image of site through consolidating inoperative vehicles and other miscellaneous materials in a screened area. b. Weaknesses: (1) Request does not conform to the land use map or defined policy. (2) Would be disruptive to adjoining residents who share private access road. (3) Effect on zoning enforcement program if code violations are made legal by permitting rather than by being removed. (4) Should the sale of parts or vehicles occur, it would be difficult to obtain evidence for enforcement purposes. 8. RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL In considering this application, the following conditions are suggested if the application is approved: a. Automobile graveyard shall be for personal use only, and no automobile parts or vehicles shall be sold on the premises. b. No signage shall be displayed on or off site related to this use. c. All provisions contained in Chapter 6 of the Roanoke County Code shall be adhered to. d. All inoperative motor vehicles, trailers, auto parts or miscellaneous materials now or in the future located on the site shall be stored within the fenced area required in Chapter 6. Chapter 6 AUTOMOBILE GRAVEYARDS' § 6-1. Defined. § 6-2. Violations of chapter. § 6-3. Record of purchases. § 6-4. Inquiry as to right of seller to make sale. § 6-5. Inspections. § 6-6. Fencing. § 6-7. To be kept free of rubbish and waste matter. • § 6-8. Abutting sidewalks to be kept clean. § 6-9. Abutting streets to be kept clear of inoperable vehicles. § 6-10. Fire extinguishers and other safety devices. § 6-11. Fires. § 6-12. Gasoline to be drained from vehicles. § 6-13. Tanks, containers, etc., to be kept drained of water. Sec. 6-1. Defined. As used in this chapter, the term "automobile graveyard" means any lot or place which is exposed to the weather and upon which more than five (5) motor vehicles of any kind, incapable of being operated, and which it would not be economically practical to make operative, or junk vehicles as defined in the zoning ordinance, are placed, located or found. (Code 1970, § 6-1; Ord. No. 84-202, 11-13-84) Cross reference-Zoning ordinance, App. A. - State law reference-Similar provisions, Code of Virginia, § 33.1-348(bx2). Sec. 6-2. Violations of chapter. TJnless othErwise specifically provided, a violation of any provision of this chapter shall constitute a Class 1 misdemeanor. Cross reference-Penalty for Class 1 misdemeanor, § 1-10. Sec. 6-3: Record of purchases. Every person operating an automobile graveyard who purchases any vehicle or vehicle parts or accessories shall record, in a book kept at his place of business, the following information concerning each such purchase: (1) The day and time of day of the purchase. (2) The name, address, race, age and height of the seller and of the person actually delivering the vehicle or parts or accessories. (3) The amount of the purchase price. 'Cross reference-Motor vehicles, Ch. 12. State law reference-Authority of county to regulate automobile graveyards, Code of Virginia, § 15.1-28. 29? § 6-3 ROANOKE COUNTY CODE (4) The make, state license number, motor number, body number, st le and seatin y g capacity of the vehicle purchased. (5) The make and identifying number of radiators, speedometers and magnetos purchased. (6) Such other information as may be necessary to prove ownership or identity of the vehicle or parts or accessories purchased. (Code 1970, § 6-14) Sec. 6-4. Inquiry as to right of seller to make sale. Before the operator of an automobile graveyard purchases any vehicle or vehicle parts or accessories, diligent inquiry shall also be made as to the legal right of the seller to make such sale. (Code 1970, § 6-14) Sec. Frs. Inspections. All automobile graveyards, together with the records required by section 6-3, shall, at all times during normal business hours, be kept open for inspection to all officers of the county having police powers, including the sheriff, zoning administrator, fire marshal and business license inspector. (Code 1970, § 6-15; Ord. No. 84-202, 11-13-84) Sec. 6-6. Fencing. (a) Automobile graveyards shall be entirely enclosed by a hedge or fence eight (8) feet in height. The fence shall be kept neatly painted and in good repair at all times as required by the zoning administrator and shall be constructed of plank boards, corrugated iron, brick, cinder block or concrete, so as to exclude such graveyards from public view. No plank board fence shall be erected within any f;re zone as now or hereafter established, and any fence so erected shall be at least twenty (20) feet from the street or road and in no event beyond the building line of other buildings on the same street or road. (b) A fence required by this section shall not be used for bill posting or other advertising purpose, except for the advertisement of the business of the owner thereof. Where the auto- mobile graveyard fronts on more than one street or road, the use of space for advertisement herein permitted shall extend to each street or road on which the graveyard abuts. (c) The contents of an automobile graveyard shall not be placed or deposited to a height greater than the height of the hedge or fence required by this section. (Code 1970, § 6-?; Ord. No. 84-202, 11-13-84) Sec. 6-7. To be kept free of rubbish and waste matter. An automobile graveyard shall, as far as practicable, be kept clear and clean of all rubbish or waste matter, as well as solid waste as defined in chapter 20 of this Code. (Code 1970, § 6-9; Ord. No. 84-202, 11-13-84) Cross references-Unlawful accumulations of trash, § 13-14; solid waste generally, Ch. 20. 298 ~~ 8 - ~o AUTOMOBILE GRAVEYARDS § 6-13 Sec. 6.8. Abutting sidewalks to be kept clean. All sidewalks abutting an automobile graveyard shall be kept clear and clean of all vehicles, trash or other waste matter. (Code 1970, § 6-13) Sec. 6-9. Abutting streets to be kept clear of inoperable vehicles. All streets abutting an automobile graveyard shall be kept clear and clean of all vehicles incapable of being operated under their own power. (Code 1970, § 6.13) Sec. 6-10. )ire eztinguishers and other safety devices. Safety devices, such as fire extinguishers or other like apparatus, shall be required at an automobile graveyard as set forth in the building code and fire prevention code. (Code 1970, § 6-10; Ord. No. 84-202, 11-13-84) Cross references-Building code, § 7-16 et seq.; fire prevention code, § 9-34 et seq. Sec. 6-11. pres. (a) No open fires for the burning of rubbish, trash, automobiles or parts thereof or other waste matter shall be permitted at an automobile graveyard; provided, that an accidental or casual fire occasioned by the use of an acetylene torch shall not be regarded as an open fire, where it is shown that the person operating or maintaining the automobile graveyard has, by the use of fire extinguishers or other safety devices, made reasonable effort to prevent the same. _ (b) No fire, open or enclosed, for the burning of automobiles, parts thereof or any rubbish or trash shall be permitted at an automobile graveyard, if the smoke or fly ash therefrom will damage the property of any person. (Code 1970, § 6-8) Cross reference-Air pollution control, Ch. 3. Sec. 6-12. Gasoline to be drained from vehicles. All tanks and engines of vehicles at automobile graveyards shall be kept thoroughly drained of gasoline. (Code 1970, § 6-11) Sec. 6-13. Tanks, containers, etc., to be kept drained of water. All tanks, engines, automobile parts, receptacles and containers capable of holding water or any source of stagnant water whatever, where mosquitoes may breed at an automobile graveyard, shall be kept thoroughly drained and dry. (Code 1970, § 6-12) [The next page is 349) 299 . ~ T ~ T RAND L. TyELMA M p,~QTT~ ~ m ~.SIEALTNO,~ ~ OF j/zACT 7, . OF THE /3URRU55 LAti/D A,yO ~ ~ ~ L ~ JACK G BESS ~ L UM/3EQ COMPAN /NC. MAP ,5/ UArEO ON /A. ~ ~ ' o~~ ' / . ~ LANO ~SU~IIEYAR Z SEC. RTE. J4O NEA,F /3E~/NEjj 5P /~t/GS /~/ 7"//E ~ ` ~ / ~ / ~,./ , /~~ D CArAW/~A MAG/5lEQ/AL D/Sj~P/Cr OF / ~ ~ CERTIFICATE No. ~ iQOANOKE COUNTY VRG/N/sl . 9Ti 1070 ~~~ T ScNLE ~ /"~ 200' I Mir /5, /9B/ /~~ LAND SvP /3/.; `JACK G . /3f51 ' Ccarici£q L.~.v~ 5 uq/cyoK d!Q..I Iff• D • 9/92 ~ ~' - K~ ~ - g - ----~ NU Q~ s0~o ~suK _ ~ ,,_RO. I "'~. ~ . ~~ ~.~r 912 Mir ~ $ 1 ~o ~NGS ~ ~, HL_~RD f ~eENNETT~ r~ ~ I i ,I :, ~ '~ ~' ~~ Sao ~ ~, ~. _ ,. ;. E~_ ~ '~~ 9 ~ ~ ~(v(YT~OR. \ ....,. Vif'_INITV IIIAD ^ .v^..^ ^ ^ mn^ D unnru 11 V 1\ 1 11 A k `\ ROANOKE COUNTY Randy Lynn Pratt d DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT Special Exception - Automobi 1 e Graveyard 1~8-/a A p p E A R A N C E R E Q U E S T ~~ / PUBLIC HEARING ON ~ Q 4 • L O ~ • L • ~.~.TT I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so that I may comment. I agree 'to follow the guidelines listed below. WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. 1, Each speaker will have between three and five minutes available whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. 2, Speakers will be limstod clarificationtmay be entertained by view only. Question the Chairman. 3. All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. 4, Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times . 5. Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. g, INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITHTHEEINDIVIDUALTTONREPRESENTATHEM,FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING P L E A S E W R I T E L E G I B L Y NAME: ~ ADDRESS: ~ FA D PHONE: PLEASE NOTE: (After filling out, give to the Deputy Clerk. Thank you.) p, p p E A R A N C E R E Q U E S T / ~8 - ~~ ~~~ PUBLIC HEARING ON ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so that I may comment. I agree to follow the guidelines listed below. WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. 1. Each speaker will have between three and five minutes available whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. 2. Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. 3. All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. 4. Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times . 5. Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. 6. INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. P L E A S E W R I T E L E G I B L Y NAME: ADDRESS: PHONE: ~~tc7~2 V ~~hL- 3 3 3~;a ~; ~;~~~' ~~ ~~ (~~~ S ~1 L L-n'l V .a .~ y 1 .S j 3F~ 7u~S PLEASE NOTE: (After filling out, give to the Deputy Clerk. Thank you.) PUBLIC HEARING ON X88 ~~ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so that I may comment. I agree to follow the guidelines listed below. WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. 1. Each speaker will have between three and five minutes available whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an iss~~e, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. 2• Speakers will be J_imited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. 3- All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. 4• Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times . 5• Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. 6• INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. P L E A S E W R I T E L E G I B L Y NAME : .r ;%, i,,~.~~, '~ v.° ADDRESS . ~'~ -~ ~ y ' ~' ~~.: `~ ~.. `' 1 PHONE : `' % ~~ ,~ ~ C~; ~ ..5 ~' ,- ,~ -- ~~ i A P P E A R A N C E R E Q U E S T ~ rye ; ~ ~ PLEASE NOTE: (After filling out, give to the Deputy Clerk. Thank you.) A P P E A R A N C E R E Q U E S T PUBLIC HEARING ON / _~~ " /~~ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so that I may comment. I agree to follow the guidelines listed below. WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. 1. Each speaker will have between three and five minutes available whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. 2. Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. 3. All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. 4. Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times . 5. Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. 6. INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. P L E A S E W R I T E L E G I B L Y NAME: ADDRESS: PHONE: /~~_,~ ~~/ PLEASE NOTE: (After filling aut, give to the Deputy Clerk. Thank you.) ~~~~ -- /~ A P P S 1i R A ~N C E R E Q U E S T ---------- -- ---- `1 ---_. PUBLIC HEARING ON ~,y~~ " ~ ~ - I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so that I may comment. I agree to follow the guidelines listed below. WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. 1. Each speaker will have between three and five minutes available whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. 2. Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. 3. All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. 4. Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times . 5. Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. 6. INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. P L E A S E W R I T E L E G I B L Y - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NAME: . ~ ~1,,~, ~~" ~~ ~Ir~lzi ~-~~C ,'~ti,,,~ ADDRESS: ~ ~ ~l~u/~C/fF / T~ PHONE : ~,~'~ -- ~f(,~/,i' PLEASE NOTE: (After filling out, give to the Deputy Clerk. Thank you.) /8~~~~ NOTICE Please take notice that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, at the County Administration Center, Community Room, 3738 Bramble- ton Avenue, will, on January 26, 1988, at the evening session beginning at 7:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, hold a public hearing on the question of the adoption of an ordinance pursuant to Section 6.00 "Cross Connection and Backflow Prevention Control in Waterworks" of the Commonwealth of Virginia Waterworks Regulations; Sections 15.1-292, 15.1-29.14, and 32.1-167, et seq• of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, concerning the imposition by Roanoke County of a cross connection inspec- tion fee of $30.00 per inspection. :The complete ordinance and related in- formation regarding the proposed fee are available for examination by the public at the place aforesaid. Any member of the public may appear at the time and place aforesaid and address the Board on the matter aforesaid. ~_ (~ . aul M. Mahoney County Attorney Please publish as follows: December 29, 1987 - morning edition January 5, 1988 - morning edition Please send bill to: Board of Supervisors P. 0. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 +* LDGAL NOTICE OF A RDGUL~IR MEETING OF THE RQANOKE OaJN`Iy BOARD OF SUPIIZVISORS Notice is hereby given to all interested persons that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, January 26, 1988, at the Roanoke County Administration Center, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, SW, in Roanoke, Virginia to hear the following requests: 1. Petition of Randy Lynn Pratt for a Special Exception Permit to operate an automobile graveyard, located on the east side of Route 740 approximately 0.76 mile north of its intersection with Route 311 in the Catawba Magisterial District. 2. Petition of Brambleton Medical Associates to amend the Roanoke County Land Use Plan: Future Land Use map designation of a 1.48 acre tract from Neighborhood Conservation to Transition, located immediately south of 3142 Brambleton Avenue in the Cave Spring Magisterial District. 3. Petition of Brambleton Medical Associates to rezone a 1.48 acre tract from R-1, Residential to B-1, Business to construct a parking lot, located immediately south of 3142 Brambleton Avenue in the Cave Spring Magisterial District. All plans and ordinances are available for inspection in the Department of Planning and Zoning, Roan 600, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, Roanoke, Virginia. Roanoke County will provide assistance to handicapped persons desiring to attend public hearings. Such individuals are requested to contact the County office of Personnel Services 703/772-2018 if special provisions are needed for attendance. Given under my hand this 6th day of January, 1988. ?~ . Mary Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Please publish: Evening Edition Roanoke Times & World-News January 12, 1988 January 19, 1988 Please bill: County of Roanoke Department of Planning & Zoning P.0. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 ITEM NUMBER ~ " AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER IN ROANOKE, VA., ON TUESDAY, MEETING DATE: January 26, 1988 SUBJECT: Lease of approximately five (5) acres in the Hollins/ Old Mountain Road area by the County of Roanoke from Ingersoll Rand for recreational purposes COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Pursuant to discussions h ]987, between Elmer C. Hodge, the Hollins/Old Mountain Road into a lease with Ingersoll Ran mately five (5) acres from I Mountain Road area of Roanoke C Specifically, the term of years and it will be expressly Roanoke County that the lease recreational purposes. Roanok~ (softball) field with backstop tract will be from Old Mountain be located adjacent to the ba lease, maintenance of the prem: Roanoke County, however, routin ity of the using party. Section 18.04 of the Count sition of any interest in real ance. The first reading of th on January 26, 1988; the February 9, 1988. old at a meeting on November 12, Brent Sheffler, and residents of area, the County agreed to enter !. The County will lease approxi- gersoll Rand in the Hollins/Old >unty . :he lease will be twenty-five (25) agreed between Ingersoll Rand and i premises shall be utilized for County will locate one baseball and team benches. Access to the Road and off-street parking wi._1.1 _lfield. During the term of the ses will be the responsibility of_ clean-up will be the responsibil- y Charter requires that the acqui- estate be accomplished by ordin- is proposed ordinance will be held econd reading is scheduled for FISCAL IMPACT: $1.00 per year plus c Roanoke County. its of any improvements made by °° RECOMMENDATION: Staff makes the following recommendation: That the Board of Supervisors consider the adoption of 1. the proposed ordinance. That the County Administrat on behalfh of1RoanokeeCounty 2' all of which such documents and toaka ~ mpl sh lthis transaction, as are nec onsform approved by the County Attorney. shall be up Respectfully submitted, ~ ~~ Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney ____ ----------------------------------- VOTE -`-- ACTION No Yes Abs p,pproved ( ) Motion by: Garrett Denied ( ) Johnson Received ( ) McGraw Referred Nickens To ~_ Robers ~- REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARANOKESCOUNTYSADMINISTRATOON AT A HELD AT PHE RO 1988 COUNTY, VIRGINIA, JANUARY 26, CENTER, ON TUESDAY, ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING ACRESEINETOHE APPROXIMATELY FIVE (5) HOLLINS/OLD MNOKEAFROMOINGERSOLLYRAND COUNTY OF ROA FOR RECREATIONAL PURPOSES E IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke B County, Virginia, as follows: That pursuant to provisions of Section 18.04 of the 1• the lease hatter of Roanoke County, a first reading concerning C einafter-described real estate was held on January 2 o f the he r 9 , p, second reading on this matter was held on February 1988. This real estate is located in the Hollins/Old Mounta~.n 1988. and Road area of Roanoke County from Ingersoll 2, That the lease by Roanoke County oximately five (5) acres located in the Hollins/Old Rand of appr ur oses is Mountain Road area of Roanoke County for recreational p p roved; and hereby authorized and app .,Pd to exe- 3. That the County Administrator is authori~- documents and take such action] on behalf of Roanoke cute such s are necessary to accomplish this transaction, all o- County a which shall be upon form approved by the County Attorney. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNT1988MINISTRATION CENTER, ON TUESDAY, JANUARY 26, ORDINANCE 12688-4 AMENDING CHAPTER 7, "BUILDING REGULATIONS," OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE BY THE IMPOSITION OF FEES FOR CROSS CONNECTION INSPECTIONS WHEREAS, Sections 6.00, "Cross Connection and Backflow Prevention Control in Waterworks," of the Commonwealth of Virgin- is Waterworks Regulations requires each locality to have an active cross connection inspection program to protect and prevent the contamination of public water systems from private, commer- cial, and industrial sources; and WHEREAS, Roanoke County has an active cross connection inspection program coordinated through its Construction Building Services Department; and WHEREAS, no fees are imposed for the performance of cross connection inspections; and WHEREAS, notice of the public hearing imposing a cross connection inspection fee was published in the Roanoke Times and World News on December 29, 1987, and January 5, 1988; and WHEREAS, a first reading of the proposed ordinance was held on January 12, 1988; the second reading was held on January 26, 1988. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervi- sors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That effective January 26, 1988, a fee of Thirty Dollars ($30) for each cross connection inspection shall be im- posed. On motion of Supervisor Steven A. Mcgraw, seconded by Supervisor Harry C. Nickens, and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None A COPY - TESTE: m~~ ~ - Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors 1/28/88 cc: File James Nininger, Chief Building Official Tim Gubala, Assistant County Administrator Paul Mahoney, County Attorney Skip Burkart, Commonwealth Attorney Magistrate Sheriff's Department Roanoke Law Library Main Library Roanoke County Code Book ITEM NUMBER ~_„"" ~_ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUN'T'Y, VIRGINIA HINDROANOKE,ROANOKEON000ESDAYDMINISTRATTON CENTER MEETING DATE: January 26, 1988 SUBJECT: Ordinance amending Chapter 7, "Building Regulations," of the Roanoke County Code by the imposition of fees for cross connection inspections COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Section 6.00, "Cross Connection and Backflow Prevention Con- trol in Waterworks," of the Commonwealth of Virginia Waterworks Regulations requires each locality to have an active cross connec- tion inspection program. The primary reason for such 7_egislation was to protect and prevent the contamination of public water sys- tems from private, commercial, and industrial sources. The pro- tection of public water systems are insured by devices called "cross connection devices" or "backflow preventors." These de- vices prevent the possible backflow of contaminated water to enter the public system. These devices are inspected annually in order to ensure each device is working properly. Roanoke County started an active cross connection inspection program in the summer of 1977. During 1987, the Construction Building Service cross connection inspector performed 639 cross connection inspections. These inspections were performed in addi- tion to other daily building and plumbing inspection responsibili- ties. Currently no fees are collected for the cross connection inspection services. However, with a thirty dollar ($30) fee per inspection. Roanoke County could collect an additional $20,790 in revenue. This addition in revenue could pay for the cost of the cross connection inspection program. Section 15.1-29.1.4 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, provides that notice of. all fees imposed by a County pursuant to Section 15.1-292 (Public Utilities) will be advertised once a week for two successive weeks in a newspaper of general circula- tion and that such fees shall. be enacted by ordinance following a public hearing. Notice of the public hearing imposing a cross connection fee was published in the Roanoke Times and World News on December 29, 1987, and January 5, 1988. The first reading of . ~ '.- the proposed ordinance was held on January 12, 1988; the second reading and public hearing will be held on January 26, 1988. FISCAL IMPACT: Roanoke County would collect approximately $20,790 annually in additional revenue from cross connection inspections. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the following: 1. That a thirty dollar ($30) cross connection fee be imposed and become effective January 26, 1988. Respectfully submitted, .~ James T. Nininger, Jr. Chief Building Official -------------------------------- ACTION VOTE ni.-. Voc nh~ Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred To Motion by: Garrett Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers ~ -- / AT A REGULAR MEETING OF TF1E BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUN'T'Y, VIRCENTER,HONDTUESDAY,ROANOUARYCO26NT1988MINISTRATION ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 7, "BUILDING REGULATIONS," OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE BY 'T'HE IMPOSITION OF FEES FOR CROSS CONNECTION INSPECTIONS WHEREAS, Sections 6.00, "Cross Connection and Backflow Prevention Control in Waterworks," of the Commonwealth of Virgin- is Waterworks Regulations requires each locality to have an active cross connection inspection program to protect and prevent the contamination of public water systems from private, commer- cial, and industrial sources; and WHEREAS, Roanoke County has an active cross connection inspection program coordinated through its Construction Building Services Department; and WHEREAS, no fees are imposed for the performance of cross connection inspections; and WHEREAS, notice of the public hearing imposing a cross connection inspection fee was published in the Roanoke Times and World News on December 29, 1987, and January 5, 1988; and WHEREAS, a first reading of the proposed ordinance was held on January 12, 1988; the second reading was held on January 26, 1988. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervi- sors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That effective January 26, 1988, a fee of Thirty Dollars ($30) for each cross connection inspection shall be im- posed. O~ AOANpy.~ ti'A A 2 J a O (~rt V ~"~~~ ~~ ~Rrt %~1Y ~~~~~ 18 E~ 88 SFSQUICENTENN~P~ ABaauti/uleeginning BOARD OF SUPERVISORS LEE GARRETT. CHAIRMAN WINDSOR MILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RICHARD W. BORERS. VICE•CHAIRMAN ELMER C. HODGE CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON Ja nu (] a r 2 8 19 8 8 y ~ HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT STEVEN A. MCGRAW CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT Mrs. Paula Winstead 5353 Cherokee Hills Drive Salem, Virginia 24153 Dear Mrs. Winstead: The Board of Supervisors have asked me to express their sincere appreciation for your previous service to the Library Board. Allow me to personally thank you for the time you served on this Board. Citizens so responsive to the needs of their community and willing to give of themselves and their time are indeed all too scarce. Very truly yours Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors bjh Enclosure P.O. BOX 29600 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 2 4018-07 9 6 (703) 772-2004 O~ AOA Np, f~ ti 'A A Z o a 18 f~ 88 SFSQUICENTENN~P~ A Btauti~ulBtRinning C~n~tn~~ of ~v~tnnh~e BOARD OF SUPERVISORS COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE January 28, 1988 Mr. James M. Miller 3623 McDaniel Drive Salem, Virginia 24153 Dear Mr. Miller: LEE GARRETT. CHAIRMAN WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT RICHARD W. ROBERS. VICE•CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT STEVEN A. MCGRAW CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT This is to advise that at their meeting held on Tuesday, January 26, 1988, the Board of Supervisors voted unanimously to appoint you as a member of the Library Board for a four- year term beginning January 1, 1988, and expiring December 31, 1991. State law provides that any person elected, re-elected, appointed or reappointed to any body be furnished a copy of the Freedom of Information Act; your copy is enclosed. We are also sending you a copy of the Conflict of Interest Act. It is necessary that you take an oath of office before the Clerk of the Roanoke County Circuit Court. This oath must be administered prior to your participation on this Committee. Please phone Mrs. Elizabeth W. Stokes, Clerk at 387-6208 as soon as possible and arrange to have the oath administered. On behalf of the Supervisors and the citizens of Roanoke County, please accept our sincere thanks and appreciation for your willingness to accept this appointment. Very truly yours, Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors bjh Enclosures CC: Mrs. Elizabeth Stokes George Garretson, Library Director P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 2 4018-07 9 8 (703) 772-2004 O~ ROANp,I.~ a N Z ~ 2 o .a 8 E50 $$ SFSQUICENTENN~PV A Beautiful Beginning C~n~tnt~ n~ ~uttnn~~e BOARD OF SUPERVISORS COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR January 28, 1988 ELMER C. HODGE The Honorable Gerald 0. Clemens Chairman Court Community Corrections Program - Judicial Board P. 0. Box 1016 Salem, Virginia 24153 Dear Judge Clemens: LEE GARRETT. CHAIRMAN WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT RICHARD W. ROBERS. VICE-CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT STEVEN A. MCGRAW CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VIN TON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT Attached is a copy of Resolution No. 12688-3.e concerning the request from Roanoke Valley Alcohol Safety Action Program (VASAP) Policy Board for ratification and confirmation of Board Appointments. This resolution was adopted by the Board of Supervisors at their meeting on January 26, 1988. As requested, the Board ratified and confirmed the appointments of Dr. Harry C. Nickens for a one-year term, to expire December 31, 1988, and Ms. Betty Pullen for a three year term, expiring December 31, 1990. If these expiration dates are incorrect, please let us know. The VASAP Policy Board was also approved as part of the Board of Supervisors Committees, Commission and Boards. So that our records may be complete, would you please send us a copy of the By-laws establishing VASAP and a membership list. Thank you. Sincerely, ~C mac- ~, .~- p~-~•-~ Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors bjh Attachment P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24018-0798 (703) 772-2004 A-12688-3.e ITEM NUMBER ~° AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: January 26, 1988 SUBJECT: Request from Roanoke Valley Alcohol Safety Action Program (VASAP) Policy Board for ratification and confirmation of Board Appointments COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Roanoke Valley Alcohol Safety Action Program (VASAP) has previously been supervised by a Court Community Correction Program Judicial Board made up of Judges from the various communities being served by the program. This board has decided to turn over supervision of the programs to community leaders, which shall be called a Policy Board. The members on the Policy Board shall represent the jurisdictions served by the program. Attached is a letter from Judge G. 0. Clemens, Chairman of the Court Community Corrections Program Judicial Board, outlining the changes to be made. The Judicial Board has appointed Dr. Harry Nickens to serve a one year term and Ms. Betty. Pullen to serve a three-year term. The Judicial Board is requesting that the VASAP Policy Board become an official County Board with future Roanoke County appointments made by the Board of Supervisors.. They further request that these appointments be confirmed by the Board of Supervisors, and that future appointments be made by the Board of Supervisors. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the VASAP Policy Board be part of the Board of Supervisors Committees, Commissions and Boards, and that the Board of Supervisors ratify and confirm the one-year appointment of Dr. Harry C. Nickens, and the three-year term of Ms. Betty Pullen. Dr. Nickens' term will expire December 31, 1988 and Ms. Pullen's term will expire December 31, 1990. J -~ ~~-~ ~. Mary H. Allen Deputy Clerk ~ ~ ~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved (x) Motion by: Bob L. Johnson/Harry No Yes Abs Denied ( ) C. Nickens Garrett x Received ( ) Johnson x Referred McGraw x To Nickens x Robers x cc: File Judge Clemens Committee File -TWENTY-THIRD JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF VIRGINIA ,:~. J\ GiNi\ ~~ ~~1~ G. O. CLEMENS, IUDGE P. O. BOX 1016 ~ ~ CIRCUIT COURT OF THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE .\ ~ J SALEM, VIRGINIA 24153 ~< <~'~~'/ CIRCVIT COURT OF THE CITY OF ROANOKE SALEM COURTHOUSE (703) 375-3042 ~<~`~-"=~?;~'}%' ROANOKE COUNTY COURTHOUSE (703) 397.6063 CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF SALEM December 29, 1987 The Honorable Robert Johnson Chairman, Board of Supervisors Roanoke County 3738 Brambleton Avenue, S.w. Roanoke, Virginia Dear Mr. Johnson: As you are aware, for the last several years the Roanoke Valley Alcohol Safety Action Program, commonly referred to as VASAP, together with several other similar and associated programs, have been supervised and overseen by a Court Community Corrections Program Judicial Board made up of Judges from the various communities being served by the programs. The Judges have decided to turn over supervision of the programs to community leaders and the Bylaws of the program have been amended to replace the Judicial Board with a Policy Board. The Bylaws of the organization provide for the initial Policy Board to be appointed by the Judicial Board for staggered terms, the members to be from the jurisdictions served by the program. After the expiration of the initial appointment, the subsequent appointments and selection. of_ r~emhers .shall be _the._res~onsibility of the various___ governing, bodies making up__the area of___serv_ice _ of the _programs ., .~-- - -----~'~_~ ~~? The new Bylaws of the Policy Board call for the Board to consist of nine members representing the jurisdictions served by the programs. Roanoke City, Roanoke County, Salem and the Alleghany Highlands each are to have two representatives and the area of Botetourt and Craig Counties shall have one representative. -- -:~ For your jurisdiction Dr. Harry Nickens and Ms. Betty Pullen have been appointed to membership on the Policy Board. Dr. Nickens has been appointed for a 1 year term and Ms. Pullen has been appointed for a 3 year term. These appointments are for terms ending December 31, of the respective years. On behalf of the Judicial Board making these initial appointments, I would ask that you ratify and confirm these appointments and that you place these matters on your standing agendas so that these persons or their replacements might be appointed or reappointed at the appropriate time. •~=5 the Policy Board will For your further 1 Alc holoSafety Action Program, the the Juvenile Court Driver supervise the Roanoke Valley will continue to be Community Diversion Program a ro rams the very Improvement Program. These P g to day basis by day s Director. It is not anticipated tha administered and phippted °n a es in the basic concept of capable James T• substantial chang has there will be anY Corrections Program Our Court Community in the these programs. rally been recognized as cone of the most outstan in9 reason that the program cannot gene and there is n Commonwealth, continue to have the same recognition• ial Board and all of the Speaking on behalf of the Judic we express our overning bodies who Judges who receive theandnallt of f the e local g a e , rograms are in appreciation to each lendidly to see that thes P have cooperated so sp place as a service to our communities. V ry truly yours, 'G. O emens, Chairman, Corrections Program - Court Community Judicial Board GOC:c K~j~~''v,>Kt T ii•i~5 L w~nL.:--V~»S ~~, a ~ lau P~Ui"~1tEii - 1C~islly4~r «=~uL~I~Htt~' S f=;=~ - ~~.~ifvijKE Cul,!vTY r;ui-nU ~f- ~~PcRJISUiZ S73U t.+t~t;l°i~LcTLI~v Sw N U ~~'X Ly~sii0 nJHi„uKt Vr~ L4Uiu Tt OF Vlkhiivli~+ Y :F KUniv~r\t ~lo.UU r~-rlutiVlT l.F Puol.Ii:hTiufv 1, i Tf-ic vivUi:KSIi,~'~tu) H;,~ ui=rTt~th VF ES-.nuRLU Li~KPIKATIUiv, wHICri l,t_In- AT Ifv iS i/UzJLISFitk uF Try RUr~(vaKE tS z wUr~Lu-iv~wS, H DialLY (vtvr'SNAPtK LI~HEu Irv ~<uAfvilKt, Ifv Tht~ STtiTc iF viiVIti, uu (.Er~TIFY THNT Tt-ti= HtVNEXEu Il,t t^,;i F~UuLiSttcu Iiv JHIU i"vtw~PAPt~KS I[/~y/~ T rtUl(vlia~~ Ui/l~~/~~~ ilUKi1~I:uv ~tiz_iS, TtiiS oTn OhY uF .N('dU~KY 1~82i uFFICER' S SIG~'vr~TUKE NOTICE Please take notlee That. the Board of SuOervlsors of Roanoke County, Vlrpini+~ at the County Administration Center, Community Room, 373! BramblNon Avenue, wIH, on January 16; 19M, at the weninp •esslonbeplnnlnp at 7;pp p,m., or as soon thereafter as The matNr may W heard, hold a Dublic hurlnp, on the quesflon of the sdopflon of ah ordinance Pursuant to geeflen b.p0 ••Cross Connection and Baekflow Pr~wntlon Codfrot' In Waterworks" oY The Com- monweslth of Vlrplnla Water- works ReOYlatlons; Sections 15.1-194, 1S.b19.U, snd 31.1- 167, et seq. of the 1950 Code of Virplnla, as amended, eon-, eernlnp .the Imposltlon bY- Roanoke CounW of.a eroa eonneetlon Inspeetlon fN of f30.00 per InsD~cfion. The complete ordinanu and relst- sd Inform~flon repardlnp the proposed fee art svaileble for examination by fM Public at fha place aforesaid. Any member of The public may appear of the time and plan sforeseid and address thg~ sosrd on the matter sfore- said. Psul M. Mahoney County Attorney (11914) ~ `1 as h~~ ytiA PNph Q Pa ~N~~n~ ~~~ o ~ °~ ~~ H ~ ~~ r-- _ ~ z v z z g ~ a' z cz cz ca ~o W w ~ E-+~~~~ ~ ~ U w z O~ U (~ W O W x~ H w W O W c~ U~ o~ 7 ~ ~0 3 cs N~ ~ z w ,~+~ Q ~ U O Q z cz W ,~ N cz O x z~ LL- o v~~ a a~ w o a~ ~ - a o w - w ~ ~x .~, O v H ~ 0 ~ ~ z2 a ~ H j ~- > a'CUcno~ ~~ .r ~ W~ l6~ W O W O a O _ ~,. ~ Q ~ a c- Cq U ~ CJ~ 1~ ~ Q J ~ ~ ~ 3 cn i a cn w ~ w ~ ~~r 3x II ~ S Z a xu~xN° v _ ~ j ~ _ m ~ ~ N W W Q o i vim` I ti ~ I W ~ ~ Q ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ F ._ -_______i a ~,,, I O= q N ~_~ _ ~ CA I ~ J ~- !-~ Q~ ~ ~ I (r = ~ I l_ ~ ,N ,w ~1°p 1 ~ ~~,b! - _ ~ - N I I -; ~ ~ ~ ~ ,00 Oil i I ,,s~. ~ o v- ~ ~ I M„OO,yl,~2 y ~ I~~ ~ _~~~I~ ~ I i ~~ o o ~ ~ o ~ Q ~ I ~ ~,~~ ~ ,000~1~ Q ~ J O ~- i M„o0,y~,~z y --I ~ I ~ ~` ~ Q i ~ ~ ~ o I ~ ~ p ~~ I Lv ~ I N ~Z~ca4 ~~ v ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ h~ Q ~ ~~ Nm~N m Q Q ~ I mcr~ ~o o ~° ~' i`a ~C '~ b ~ / ~ ~ v ~~ II 1I II q I~ .~~ ~ ~. S Q : - r ~~ ~ r U ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~• Z rn~~~~M~M ` ~ ~ I ~~-~~ ~i(l /' ~ 0 E- ~ ~O ~fl N \O M N c1' ~ o '-~ ,-~ ~ t~: ~ , OZ ~ ~ ~ ~ I~il __ '~~ ~~ L t ~ z Q www333w3 ~ U W (n ~~ Q o - > U W ; O ~ N ~ ~ cn ~ c CC cn - Z (n L W ~ ~ D W ~ N W ~ f Z C ~ - C J C~ ~ Z • w ~- 0 0 m C