The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1/12/1988 - Regularr o~•Pp~NV a z .~~ ~~~~~~.~ ~~~~~ ~s ~ as SFSQUICEH7ENN,P~' ROANORE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS A Btawli~wl Beginning ACTION AGENDA JANUARY 12, 1988 Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meeting. Regular meetings are held on the second and the fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public Hearings will be heard at 7:00 p.m on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. AFTERNOON SESSION A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.) 1. Roll Call. 2. Invocation: John Chambliss Assistant County Administrator 3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag. B. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS NONE C. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS. NONE D. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS AND AWARDS LG PRESENTED CERTIFICATE OF APPRECIATION TO BOB JOHNSON FOR HIS WORK IN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT E. NEW BUSINESS 1. Establishment of 1988 Holiday Schedule. BLJ/SAM TO ADOPT URC 2. County Board memberships of Committees, Commissions and Boards for 1988. HCN/BLJ TO APPROVE URC 3. Authorization to amend the restrictive covenants for Mountain View Farm Technological Park. BLJ/HCN TO AUTHORIZE URC 4. Request for Approval to Borrow Money for County School Building Renovations. LG/HCN TO APRENOVATION OF WILLDAM BYRDEJRTEHIGH SCHOOLTANDRTOTAL MILLION FOR NOT TO EXCEED .$3,985,000. URC g, Approval of Capital Expenditure for Airport Terminal Development Project. HCN/BLJ TO APPROVE URC F. REQUEST FOR WORK SESSIONS G. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. REQUEST FOR PUBLIC HEARING ON 1/26/88 FOR CITIZEN INPUT ON $8/89 BUDGET. 2. REQUEST TO MOVE PUBLIC HEARING ON CURB & GUTTERING FROM 1/26/88 TO 2/23/88. H. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance amending Chapter 7, Building Regulations of the Roanoke County Code by the imposition of fees for cross connection inspection. HCN/SAM TO APPROVE 1ST READING 2ND READING & PUBLIC HEARING SET 1/26/88 - URC . I. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance amending Chapter 7, "Building Regulations" of the Roanoke County Code by repealing Article III, Section 7-31, "General Contractors' Bonds," Section 7-32 "Plumbing 2 Contractors' Bond," and Section 7-33, "Electrical Contractors' Bond". HCN/BLJ TO ADOPT ORD. URC 2. Ordinance authorizing the acquisition of certain real estate located within the City of Roanoke adjacent to the Roanoke Regional Airport, and the conveyance of said real estate in exchange for certain real estate for an access road and approval of a certain agreement with the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission. BLJ/HCN TO ADOPT ORD. URC NONE J. APPOINTMENTS 1. Court Service Unit Advisory Council/Youth and Family Services Advisory Board 2. Grievance Panel 3. Health Department Board of Directors 4. Library Board K. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS MCGRAW ANNOUNCENNEXATIONCPROBLEMSL BUTETHE MEETINGTWAS CANCELED SOLUTIONS FOR A DUE TO SNOW. WILL BE RESCHEDULED. I,. CONSENT AGENDA ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY. BLJ/LG TO APPROVE URC 1. Minutes of Meeting - October 27, 1987, November 17, 1987. 3 2. Confirmation of Committee Appointment to the Library Board. 3. Request for acceptance of the following roads into the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System: a. Snowgoose Circle b. Millwheel Drive, Mill Pond Drive, and Stone Mill Drive. 4. Approval of Resolution of Support for request by the Virginia Department for the Aging for 13.2 million funding. 5. Request for approval of a Bingo Permit for the Loyal Order of Moose Lodge No. 284. M. CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS DOT ELLER, 3611 MCDANIEL DR. SPOKE CONCERNING THE REASSESSMENTS. REQUESTED THAT RATE BE CUT OR THAT SENIOR.CITIZENS' TAXES BE FROZEN. BOARD DIRECTED STAFF TO INVESTIGATE THE STATE LIMIT FOR FREEZING ASSESSMENTS AND THE POSSIBILITY OF INCORPORATING A COST OF LIVING ADJUSTMENT TO THE ASSETS RAISING THE LIMIT. FOR FREEZING. N. REPORTS RECEIVED AND FILED 1. Accounts Paid for November 1987. 2. Results of the Healthcare Survey. BOARD DIRECTED KC TO INCLUDE STUDY OF TPA'S AND WELLNESS PROGRAM IN BIDDING OF HEALTHCARE. 3. Water and Sewer Bill Relief for Water Consumption for Flood Cleanup 4. Accounts Paid for December 1987. O. WORK SESSION 1. Secondary Highway Six-Year Plan 4 r HCN/SAM TO APPROVES RESOS FOURC YEAR PLAN AND PRIORITY LISTING AS AMENDED DURING DISCUSSION p, EXECUTIVE SESSION pursuant to tersonnelomatteginia 2.1-344 (a). (1) to discuss a p HCN/RR - UW AT 4:30 P.M- Q, ADJOURNMENT TO JANTgEYp~NNING COMMISSIONM•ANDRJANUARYT WORK SESSION WITH 22, 1988 AT 9:OOFROM.1/02/88ETHROUGHEI/24/88EATE5TOOT HOLLINS COLLEGE p.M. 5 .s OF ROAN ~,~ ~ w i cpi ~ a= Cn~~trt~ ~~ ~u~rt~~.~e ,~ ~ 18 .~~ 88 SFSaIJICENTENN~P~ ABcauti(ulBeginning ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA JANUARY 12, 1988 Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meeting. Regular meetings are held on the second and the fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public Hearings will be heard at 7:00 p.m on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. AFTERNOON SESSION A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.) 1. Roll Call. 2. Invocation: 3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag. B. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS C. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS. D. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS AND AWARDS E. NEW BUSINESS 1. Establishment of 1988 Holiday Schedule. 2. County Board memberships of Committees, Commissions and Boards for 1988. 3. Authorization to amend the restrictive covenants for Mountain View Farm Technological Park. 4. Request for Approval to Borrow Money for County School Building Renovations. >,. 8. Approval of Capital Expenditure for Airport Terminal Development Project. F. REQUEST FOR WORK SESSIONS G. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS H. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance amending Chapter 7, Building Regulations of the Roanoke County Code by the imposition of fees for cross connection inspection. I. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance amending Chapter 7, "Building Regulations" of the Roanoke County Code by repealing Article III, Section 7-31, "General Contractors' Bonds," Section 7-32 "Plumbing Contractors' Bond," and Section 7-33, "Electrical Contractors' Bond". 2. Ordinance authorizing the acquisition of certain real estate located within the City of Roanoke adjacent to the Roanoke Regional Airport, and the conveyance of said real estate in exchange for certain real estate for an access road and approval of a certain agreement with the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission. J. APPOINTMENTS 1. Court Service Unit Advisory Council/Youth and Family Services Advisory Board 2. Grievance Panel 2 •. 3. Health Department Board of Directors 4. Library Board K. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS L. CONSENT AGENDA ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY. 1. Minutes of Meeting - October 27, 1987, November 17, 1987. 2. Confirmation of Committee Appointment to the Library Board. 3. Request for acceptance of the following roads into the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System: a. Snowgoose Circle b. Millwheel Drive, Mill Pond Drive, and Stone Mill Drive. 4. Approval of Resolution of Support for request by the Virginia Department for the Aging for 13.2 million funding . 5. Request for approval of a Bingo Permit for the Loyal Order of Moose Lodge No. 284. M. CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS N. REPORTS 1. Accounts Paid for November 1987. 2. Results of the Healthcare Survey. 3. Water and Sewer Bill Relief for Water Consumption for Flood Cleanup 3 .~ 4. Accounts Paid for December 1987. O. WORR SESSION 1. Secondary Highway Six-Year Plan P. EXECUTIVE SESSION pursuant to the Code of Virginia 2.1-344 (a). Q. ADJOURNMENT TO JANUARY 19 1988 AT 5:30 P.M. FOR A JOINT WORK SESSION WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION, AND JANUARY 22, 1988 AT 9:00 A.M. FOR THE PURPOSE OF A RETREAT AT HOLLINS COLLEGE FROM 1/22/88 THROUGH 1/24/88 AT 5:00 P.M. 4 A-11288-1 ITEM NUMBER ~~~~ -``~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF' ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER. MEETING DATE: January 12, 1988 SUBJECT: County Holiday Schedule for Calendar Year 1988 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMME,/NTS: SUMMARY OF INFOR`MATIoON: Each year at this time, the County establishes the holiday schedule for the calendar year. In previous years, there have been conflicts with holidays in some county offices. In calendar year 1987, the holiday schedule authorized by the Code of Virginia for State employees was adopted by the County. The Employee Advisory Committee recommends that the County of Roanoke follow the holiday schedule established by the Code of Virginia for State employees with the day after Thanksgiving being substituted for Election Day. In accordance with Attachment A, the has requested that the Library System Day, George Washington's Birthday, and Veterans Day so that the County the public. They have also requester one of the minor holidays to close on Roanoke County Library Board be open on Lee-Jackson-King Columbus Day, Election Day, libraries can better serve i to reserve the right to use Christmas Eve. A comparison of the holiday schedules for the State of Virginia, City of Roanoke, City of Salem, and Roanoke County is enclosed with this report as Attachment B. RECOMMENDATIONS: It is recommended that the following holiday schedule be adopted for calendar year 1988: New Year's Day Lee-Jackson-King George Washington Memorial Day Independence Day Labor Day Columbus Day Veterans Day January 1 Day 3rd Monday Day 3rd Monday Last Monday July 4 1st Monday 2nd Monday November 11 in January in February in May in September in October Thanksgiving Day 4th Thursday in November Day After Thanksgiving Friday after 4th Thursday Day in November Christmas Day December 25 and any day appointed by the Board of Supervisors or the Governor of Virginia as a legal holiday or for State or County offices to close. In this recommendation, the day after Thanksgiving is substituted for Election Day. It is also recommended that the Library System remain open on certain holidays designated by the Roanoke County Library Board. For those offices that remain open on designated holidays or do not otherwise follow the established holiday schedule, it is recommended that the total number of holidays shall not exceed 11 days or a total of 88 hours in a calendar year for any employee. The Employee Handbook will be revised accordingly if the recommended holiday schedule for 1988 is approved. SUBMITTED BY: D. K. Cook Director of Human Resources APPROVED: Elmer C. odg County Administrator RESOLUTION: YES NO ---------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs Approved (x) Motion By: Bob L. Johnson/ Garrett x Denied ( ) Steven A. McGraw to approve Johnson x Received ( ) staff recommendation McGraw x Referred ( ) Nickens x To Robers x cc: File Keith Cook Assistant County Administrators Department Heads • ~ ATTACHMENT A ~. ~.AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY LIBRARY BOARD OF TRUSTEES, HEI.D'AT~THE HEADQUARTERS LIBRARY ON WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 18, 1987 AT 5:45 P.M. RESOLUTION FOR THE ROANOKE COUNTY LIBRARIES TO BE OPEN ON MINOR HOLIDAYS On a motion by Richard Kirkwood, seconded by Leesa Dalton, the following resolution was passed; Whereas, the Roanoke County Public Libraries provide a needed service to the citizens of Roanoke County by being open as often as possible, and Whereas, by being open on minor holidays the County Libraries can better serve the public, Therefore, the Library Board of Trustees requests to the County Supervisors of Roanoke County that the Libraries be allowed to remain open on these five holidays; Lee-Jackson-King Day George Washington's Birthday Columbus Day Election Day Veterans Day and the full time staff members be granted a Holiday Earned on these days. Furthermore, the Library Board reserves the right to use one of the minor holidays to close on Christmas Eve, the slowest day of the year. Ayes: Dalton, Eddy, Kirkwood, Pence, Winstead -:;, ~;~,~ Nayes: None ;. c~~ ~ 2G0 `~V. - A Copy-Tes to : ~,~, ~°aS,~~°\ ~-- Qe~ ~_ ~~ ~~~,~:: _~_ George D. Garretson, Library .Director .~ HOLIDAY SCFiEDiJLFS ATTACHMENT B State of I Virginial Roanoke I County2 Roanoke City3 I Salem City4 New Years Day X X X X Lee Jackson King Day X X X Salem Day George Washington Day X X X Salem Day Memorial Day X X X X Independence Day X X X X Labor Day X X X X Columbus Day & Yorktown Day X X Salem Day Election Day X X, Veterans Day X X Salem Day Thanksgiving Day X X X X Day after Thanksgiving X Christrnas Day X X X X Total 11 11 9 10 1Holiday schedule established by Code of Virginia for State employees. 2Holiday schedule established by Roanoke County for 1987. 3Holiday schedule established by Roanoke City for 1987. 4Holiday schedule established by Salem City provides for six holidays for office closing; however, four holidays (Lee Jackson King Day, George Washington Day, Columbus Day/Yorktown Day, and Veterans Day) are designated as "Salem Days" with city offices remaining open. The four "Salem Days" are taken by city employees at the discretion of the employee's department head. 1-5-88 A-11288-2 ITEM NUMBER C" AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: January 12, 1988 SUBJECT: 1988 Board of Supervisors Committee Assignments COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Attached is a copy of the proposed membership assignments for the members of the Board of Supervisors. Please note that several positions are automatically assigned to the Chairman, and several others have regular expiration dates, and are not appointed at this meeting. SUBMITTED BY: „1 ~Yl at.l..~.~.. ~. f , Mary H. Allen Deputy Clerk APPROVED BY: ~/' (/ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ACTION VOTE Approved (x) Motion by: Harry C. Nickens/Bob No Yes A~ Denied ( ) L. Johnson to approve attached Garrett x _ Received ( ) list Johnson x Referred - To McGraw x Nickens x Robers x cc: File Committee Book Board Members ,4 . PROPOSED 1988 COMMITTEE ASSIGNMENTS ~ ~ ~. Richard Robers -- Western Virginia Development Corporation ++ -- Fifth Planning District Commission (2-year term expires 6/30/89) -- Clean Valley Committee -- Sesquicentennial Committee Lee Garrett ** -- State Emergency Services Committee (As Chairman) ** -- Regional Partnership (As Chairman) -- Audit Committee ++ -- Social Services Board (4-year term expires 1/1/90) ++ -- Regional Airport Commission Bob L. Johnson ++ -- Fifth Planning District Commission (3-year term expires 6/30/90.) -- Audit Committee ++ -- Regional Airport Commission Steven A. McGraw -- Cablevision Committee -- Blue Ridge Region Commission -- Sesquicentennial Committee Dr. Harry C. Nickens -- Cablevision Committee ++ -- Transportation and Safety Commission (4-year term expires 4/1/91) -- River Project Committee ** Chairman automatically serves on these committees ++ These committees have regular expiration dates and are therefore not appointed at the Organizational Meeting. A-11288-3 Item ~- AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER IN ROANOKE, VA., ON TUESDAY, MEETING DATE: January 12, 1988 SUBJECT: Amendments to Protective Covenants for Mountain View Farm Technological Park COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~~ ~ SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors rezoned approximately 32 acres in March 1983, on Hollins Road in order to develop an industrial park. Subsequently, AMP, Inc. located on the site and the County staff marketed the remaining 7.168 acres as an industrial site. Protective covenants governing the use and development of the County property were prepared and recorded in May 1983. During the negotiations for the sale of the County property to Shimchock, it became apparent that there were discrepancies between the recorded protective covenants and copies possessed by the neighborhood citizens. In order to expedite the sale of the property and respond to citizen concerns about the Mountain View Farm property development, several proposed amendments to the protective covenants have been prepared (see attachment>. FISCAL IMPACT: None RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors authorize the staff to amend the protective covenants and record these changes with Roanoke County Circuit Court. SUBMITTED BY: .-~ i / Timothy W. ubalaa/la Assistant County Administrator Community Development APPROVED: ~u~ c/ Elmer C. Hod County Administrator t .~ ------------- ------------------------------------- ACTION --------- --------------- VOTE Approved (x) Motion by: Bob L. Johnson/Harry C. No Yes Ak Denied ( ) Nickens to approve sta Garrett x Received ( ) recommendation Johnson _ x Referred McGraw _ x To Nickens x ~ Robers _ x cc: File Paul Mahoney Tim Gubala ,~ AMENDME~Tr TO PROTEICI'IVE CC~IIIVANI'S MOUI~TI'AIN VIEW FARM TECHNOLOGICAL PARK This amendment to the Protective Covenants of the Mountain View Farm Technological Park, is made this day of January, 1988, by the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors; AMP, Incorporated; and Shimchock's Litho Service, Inc. (hereinafter the "owners") pursuant to the modification provisions of Section 7.02 of the Protective Covenants as recorded in Deed Book 1199, page 1417, among the records of the Clerk of the Circuit Court for Roanoke County, Virginia. The owners hereby agree to modify or amend the Protective Covenants previously imposed, and are the owners of more than sixty-five percent (650) of the property specified in Exhibit "B". The modifications or amend- ments to Article V, "Additional Restrictions" are as follows: 5.05. Public Use Park That certain parcel of real estate owned by the County of Roanoke, as described in a survey dated the 27th day of October, 1987, and recorded in the office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court and found in Plat Book 10 at page 109, containing approximately eight (8) acres, is hereby reserved to remain as is, until the need arises for this parcel to be used for other public park and recreational uses. These public park and recreational activities are limited to football, soccer, baseball, either adult or youth, and similar endeavors. 5.06. Access to Public Use Park The access to the public use park shall be from Hollins Road. ROANOKE COiJNI'Y BOARD OF SUPERVISORS By County Administrator AMP, Incorporated By Shimchock's Litho Service, Inc. `~ By E - /f AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE IN ROANOKE, VA., ON MEETING DATE: January 12, 1988 OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRA'T'ION CENTER TUESDAY, SUBJECT: Request for Approval to Borrow Money for County School Building Renovations COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: c?liwr% ~~ ~~~~ . Back Creek Elementary School and Bent Mountain Elementary School are in need of additions and renovations. Part of the addition at Bent Mountain will include a library which will be open to the public. According to federal regulations, before the renovation work can begin, asbestos must be removed from the two buildings. Preliminary cost estimates are as follows: Back Creek Elementary $2,500,000 Bent Mountain Elementary 1,200,000 Library Addition at Bent Mountain 85,000 Asbestos Removal 200,000 $3.985.000 In addition to the above, it is anticipated that additional funds will be needed for the renovation of William Byrd Junior High School for the new School Administration offices. The 1986 bond issue included $800,000 for this renovation. At this time, we would like to request an additional $2,000,000 for this renovation. It is anticipated that additional funding will be needed at some time in the future when all cost estimates have been accumulated for this project. On December 10, 1987, the County School Board authorized the application to the Virginia Public School Authority for a loan not to exceed $3,700,000 for renovation and additions to the Back Creek and Bent Mountain Elementary Schools. On January 14, 1988, the County School Board is expected to increase this authorization to include the library addition, asbestos removal, and William Byrd renovation to bring the total of the application amount to $5,985,000. To be eligible for VPSA spring issue, the County must submit its application packet including resolutions from local governing bodies and school boards no later than January 19, 1988. The attached resolution authorizes the County School Board to proceed with application to the VPSA to borrow $5,985,000. ~~ The County also has several areas in need of renovation in the County Building. These include, but are not limited to, the Treasurer's Office, Commissioner of Revenue's office, County Assessor's office, improvements to the entrance and parking of the County Administration Building, firing range for the Sheriff's deputies, and the exterior of the Kessler Mill Road building. While not defined, it is expected that these renovations could be as much as $1,000,000. County staff will be working on cost estimates and financing for these projects to be presented to the Board during the 1988-89 budget process. Attached you will find several schedules showing the current debt position of the County. Attachment A shows the future County debt service payments, which includes debt which has actually been issued and debt which has been approved by the Board but has yet to be issued, to be at a level of $3,657,930 for the fiscal year ended June 30, 1988. The debt service payments will peak in the fiscal year ended June 30, 1993 at $6,228,421. By adding the new debt requested in this report, the County debt will peak at $6,874,801 in the year ended June 30, 1993. This is shown graphically on Attachment B. FISCAL IMPACT: ~l~ The debt service, which is funded through the general tax revenues, will increase based upon the attached schedules. RECOMMENDATION: In order to meet filing deadlines for the VPSA spring issue, the Board needs to approve the attached resolution authorizing the County School Board to apply for $5,985,000 in school loans. Staff recommends that the Board carefully consider the total financial picture of the County and its present level of debt before committing itself to additional debt. SUBMITTED BY: fcxm~~ ~ ~c.r Diane D. Hyat Director of Finance Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred To Motion by: APPROVED: Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs Garrett Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers ~,,; '~' ,~ RESOLUTION SY TH,~ COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD OF ROANOKE COUNTY AUTHORIZING APPLICATION TO THE VIRGINIA PUBLIC SCHOOL AUTHORITY WHEREAS, feasibility studies have been conducted at Back Creek and Bent Mountain Elementary schools in Roanoke County to determine building needs based on projected population growth in the areas feeding the respective schools and on educational programs, and WHEREAS, the studies have concluded that renovation and addition to existing facilities would be most feasible; BE IT RESOLVED that the County School Board of Roanoke County, on motion of Charlsie S. Pafford and duly seconded, authorizes application to the Virginia Public School Authority for a loan not to exceed $3,700,000.00 for renovation and additions to the Back Creek and Bent Mountain Elementary schools. Adopted on the following roll call vote: AYES: Paul G. Black, Richard E. Cullinan, Charlsie S. Pafford, Barbara B. Chewning, Frank E. Thomas NAYS: None TESTE: ~ ), Attachment A ~- y SUNDEBT COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA SUtlMARY OF DEBT SERVICE PAYlIENTS FOR EXISTING AND POTENTIAL DEBT GENERAL AND SCHOOL FUNDS ONLY AS OF JANUARY 12,1988 ALL DEBT PREVIOUSLY ALL DEBT PREVIOUSLY DEBT ACTUALLY APPROVED (WHETHER APPROVED AND FISCAL YEAR ISSUED ISSUED OR NOT) THIS ISSUE ENDED 6-30- ---------------- (SEE ATTACHMENT C) ---------------- tSEE ATTACHMENT D) ---------------- (SEE ATTACHMENT E) ---------------- 1988 $3,254,205 83,657,930 83,657,930 1989 3,221,102 4,331,154 5,064,317 1990 3,232,971 5,955,906 6,667,373 1991 3,222,207 6,104,656 6,794,427 1992 3,244,700 6,190,649 6,858,725 1993 3,269,463 6,228,421 6,874,801 1994 3,214,458 5,786,003 6,410,687 1995 1,901,750 4,112,353 4,715,342 1996 1,859,046 4,065,172 4,646,465 1997 1,839,881 4,005,679 4,565,277 1998 1,814,633 3,990,179 4,528,081 1999 1,805,580 3,951,738 4,467,944 2000 1,769,652 3,906,582 4,401,093 2001 1,803,292 3,914,358 4,387,173 2002 65,692 ~ 2,189,669 2,640,788 2003 63,970 2,157,782 2,587,206 2004 62,248 2,203,771 2,611,499 2005 60,526 496,385 882,418 2006 24,804 442,998 807,335 2007 24,102 430,632 773,273 2008 394,865 715,811 2009 154,805 154,805 2010 32,618 ---------------- 32,618 ---------------- TOTALS ---------------- 835,754,282 574,704,305 885,245,388 Attachment B Q m W W J Q z w ~ ~ Q ~ Z C.7 Z_ ~.1_ ~ ~_ X W li 0 /~n 4 J V ~` O O N W I- W ~ C'J p W O ~ N b 0 0 0 N W O td ~ dl Q 61 T 1 T N rn T W ,~~}-~ 'V l1 4 1 T~T V1 T d ~SUOI~~Iw3 I~ tD -ln d' f'7 N r Attachment~C -y COUNTI( OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA Notes to Financial Statements The annual requirements to amortize long-term debt and related interest are as follows: GENERAL FUND SPECIAL REVENUE FUND ENTERPRISE FUNQ TOTAL FISCAL YEAR PRINCIPAL INTEREST PRINCIPAL INTEREST PRINCIPAL INTEREST PRINCIPAL INTEREST .TOTAL 1987.88 $ 1,084,671 $ 1,268,720 $ 528,763 $ 372,051 $ 626,903 $ 677,729 $ 2,240,337 $ 2,318,500 $ 4,558,837 1988.89 1,344,429 1,169,485 357,095 350,093 784,977 627,144 2,486,501 2,146,722 4,633,223 1989-90 1,513,870 1,057,488 332,028 329,585 854,782 569,984 2,700,680 1,957,057 4,657,737 1990-91 1,607,645 941,493 364,695 308,374 922,855 511,373 2,895,195 1,761,240 4,656,435 1991.92 1,774,775 815,728 369,565 284,632 1,014,392 445,799 3,158,732 1,546,159 4,704,891 1992.93 1,955,470 680,096 373,929 259,968 1,084,197 375,634 3,413,596 1,315,698 4,729,294 1993.94 2,052,600 536,810 390,263 234,785 1,145,733 301,669 3,588,596 1,073,264 4,661,860 1994-95 833,295 440,737 414,767 212,951 640,538 244,994 1,888,600 898,682 2,787,282 1995.96 860,425 384,802 424,900 188,919 647,075 205,122 1,932,400 778,843 2,711,243 1996-97 901,120 325,867 449,400 163,494 681,880 163,292 2,032,400 652,653 2,685,053 1997.98 941,815 263,018 473,900 135,900 416,685 119,312 1,832,400 518,230 2,350,630 1998.99 996,075 196,666 506,567 106,272 454,758 87,145 1,957,400 390,083 2,347,483 1999.2000 1,036,770 127,808 531,067 74,007 489,563 54,171 2,057,400 255,986 2,313,386 2000.01 1,118,160 62,385 580,066 42,681 509,174 22,823 2,207,400 127,889 2,335,289 2001.02 - - 57,400 8,292 - - 57,400 8,292 65,692 2002-03 - - 57,400 6,570 - - 57,400 6,570 63,970 2003-04 - - 57,400 4,848 - - 57,400 4,848 62,248 2004-05 - - 57,400 3,126 - - 57,400 3,126 60,526 2005.06 - - 23,400 1,404 - - 23,400 1,404 24,804 2006-07 - - 23,400 702 - - 23,400 702 24,102 TOTALS $ 18,021,120 $ 8,271,103 $ 6,373,405 $ 3,088,654 $ 10,273,512 $ 4,406,191 $ 34,668,037 $ 15,765,948 $ 50,433,985 (Continued) 38 Attachment D ~_ y GFD A N s F 6 A O 6 C G°a z W D O ~ a » V H Z Z I-y V H ni O W a m W A S H G7 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 E 1 1 1 1 1 1 W i I N I H 1 1 F ~ 1 A Z W O O CUi7 i 1 1 i A S~ W a w W O 1 1 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 1 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 1 I 01 O (~ V' N N ~Ll L` ri M O tM O O VI m m M .0 rl V~ N m ~-7 I M ~D O m M N 0 0 (~ M V' m VI •O vl t}' ti ti O N M O .--1 d I O n m O M M 10 to O 10 O 4/Y M VI m 0 e-i m u'f N u'1 m ~O F 1 O I m N 01 •0 O N .--1 .-1 .-1 Y O l~ V' O M N m 0 [~ to O1 ep N H i n 'M-1 n GOD ~~ Vim' VNl C M o 001 ~ GmD ~ Val ~ W n n~ N M 1 1 1 F I L 1 d' a0 t~ ~ t` t\ (~ ~'1 ~'1 u7 I!1 d' cll V' N N N 11 O 'I 0 11 M 11 O 11 ~ 11 ~ 11 i0 11 O1 11 1 a0 V~ m N 0 L~ 01 u'I O N 01 M 01 01 ~ (~ n N~ O M O m 1 1l1 M M eM M m .--1 m m~ .--1 N v0 .-1 M M N 01 01 m 0 .ti M N 1 N 01 N ~-1 L~ VI 01 T m 10 N ~G r-1 01 O ~ v0 10 M O m aA 01 e-i 1 Yl 1 M U7 .--1 01 ti n Ifl u'f ~O O O M C 0 01 N m ti N 01 [~ ~ .--1 1 .--1 01 u'1 l~ N r-I .O O M .-J m .G M 0~ C .--1 01 i0 V' O ~O M 1 cM M m l~ `C r-i L~ VI N O1 10 V~ N 01 L~ ~ M N rl N 1 C 1 N N M M M N N N .--1 r-I .--1 .~ 1 N 1 M 1 1 M 10 01 N ~0 V1 [r N ~-1 N N ti r-1 ~ .--1 H .-1 H V1 O I m I O N IA u7 C O e-i N N N N N N N N N N N N N N h 0 1 (~ n] 1 H V1 10 M m aM 1G 10 cM VI ~M T ~M iM V' V' VI V' V1 st' O m ~ 1 to d 1 1 rw-I 1 pW n Vml fOY N n~~ M~ VO1 M O C~7 m~ 0 0 n n INl1 ~ M 1 O V 1 M N 01 ~ m N O VI v'1 ~0 N n T .--1 O ~-i M t\ 10 10 ~0 .--I 1 V1 Z 1 1 1 N M M d' C to w'1 M M M M M M W N N N 1 W W 1 1 0 1 1 0 01 m M .--1 V~ O ~O tM iM .G m Vl m v0 .O L~ m m 01 01 O O 1 O (~ 0 N W~ N ~O L~ N N M VI t~ M '-/ 01 t~ V1 M .--I 1 ~p m 1 I F cJ m M m vl 01 .--I m O M et' M C .--1 eM Y7 Y'/ 10 l~ m Ot 1 N J] [ W 1 .-~ ~-1 O [~ O O 01 M sM N m 10 M N 01 T 01 01 01 01 r~-y 1 0 N 0 01 M 10 m N ~0 O M m M m M .-1 01 n to M 1 O e-i a 1 W 1 Il] 01 m (~ [~ 10 M ~ V' ai' M N N ti r1 r-1 I 1 .-i H 1 1Zy I I I I m 1 1 r.7 1 M i~ N u'1 N L~ M m V] O~ m M C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I O N M O~ V' m m N M M 0 ~-1 N N V'1 I/1 V1 u'1 II'1 ~1 I 01 n ~ ~O 01 VI N m •0 if' Vl M 01 L~ [~ L~ [~ I~ L~ [~ I N ti u"1 6 1 a 1 1 m 01 M M 01 N ~0 In r-1 ~O .1 01 VI M d' a a' V' C W d' 1 O U i .-1 [~ e-1 •0 N In 01 N N u'1 01 N •O m [~ I~ l~ [~ l~ L~ ['~ 1 N m 01 01 O O O 01 01 01 .O [~ l~ h N N N N N N N 1 M r-I s 1 1 .--~ r1 .--1 1 ~ a 1 p. 1 I 1 .-I i 1 1 I 1 I I M N .--1 M t~ m .--I N L~ V' m 10 ~O 10 M v0 O ~W l~ .-I V~ O m 1 eM rl N [~ m O ~--1 N ~0 01 M N 1 n 10 LI') N m m m m ~0 M M 10 t\ N ~O N m Ifl ~p N ~ Cn m 01 01 m sf' t~ M 01 N T .-1 i r -1 . -I ~ 01 N i i+] N 01 ~ u'f .--1 1 N (~ M d' m N IA N ~G .--1 O m VI .--1 ~ N 01 eM .-+ M N m v1 ~ m eM O l~ N m M V+ m ~O 10 VI N I ~O N a 1 W I C LI'1 L!'1 U'1 VI tM tM M M M N N N N 1 1 1p H I Z 1 H 1 1 1 ul M r-1 01 ~O I~ O C 01 N m m L~ r-1 e-1 r-1 u'1 O 1 [~ II ~p 01 01 1p M O M M L~ L~ [~ M M M [~ L~ l~ L~ (~ [~ L~ L~ O 1 N II n.] 1 n i}I n 01 m N v1 O ti ~O H m M M ~O 10 1D 10 .O 10 N m N 1 m II H 1 i m vt n .O N l~ N N 10 .-1 M m [~ V' ~W ~ ~' O O {~ m N I N m (~ W d' IIl ~O 01 O N .!1 m O~ M M M M 0 0~ ~' M 1 m li .--/ 11 V Z 1 ~ M 10 [~ [~ [~ l~ [~ m m m m 01 Ol V' V' V' V' V' V' M .~-~ 1 01 II 11 1 m 1 i M 11 r-I n a I 1 1 I u n 1 1 I 1 II 11 1 1 [~ C m 10 m L!1 m [~ 01 eM •A 01 m Y7 UY X 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 N O C m M m M m 0 ~!1 L~ V1 M N N O 1 M 11 10 11 1 H 1 C N .-I 10 O V' ~-i m O 01 O 01 In 01 ~-i 10 O 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I N 11 . 11 C1~ 1 W I _ O 10 [~ l~ N VI 01 ~0 V1 N (~ 0 ~-i tl• O O 1 01 ..+ I~ O 01 u'1 O N O l~ N .--I l~ M m U O 1 W 11 O 11 Dci 1 W 1 M sM M N m ~0 VI N Ot m l~ u'1 C N .-1 .--1 1 1 L~ 11 Ii H 1 M 1 H ~--I N N .ti .'+ .-+I N H 1 1 m 11 N II 1 1 I 1 11 II 1 1 1 i 11 ii t` m m .-I t` m o v1 1n o .n v~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 01 II I a-7 I M O N m 10 N O 01 N O N [~ I~ 10 O O O I ar M M t\ m N .O N VI m 0 l~ ti 0 0 0 I M II N 11 Phi I ~O N [~ O N O .-1 m O H 1G ~--I 10 M V1 O O I ~ li V 1 01 ~O M v0 L~ O O O N M 01 l`~ u'f O N m M n O M N L~ m 01 O ti N M M d~ ~O 1 Ilt II fM II Z 1 1 . . . . . . . . . . 1 N .--1 N N M M M r-I rl r-1 N N N N N .--1 N 1 . 11 1Gl 11 P6 1 1Y 1 1 1 M 11 11 1 1 I 11 11 1 1 11 1 1 1 I m D• O N M~~ 10 n m 01 O .-1 N M W to .Lr L~ m 01 O ..] 1 m m 01 01 01 Ot 01 T 01 01 a 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6' p3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 N 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I U 6 1 t\ m 01 O H N M ~W Vl 10 l~ m I O N M VI 1!1 10 [~ m 01 VI W 1 m m m O1 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 YI 1 01 T 01 01 01 ti 01 01 ti 01 01 01 U O O O O O O O O O O V] (4 i N N r-1 N r-1 r-1 .-1 N N .-1 ~ N N N N N N N N N N Q I {y Attachment E NEWDEBT COUNTY OF ROANOKE,VA REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF NEW DEBT VA PUBLIC SCHOOL AUTHORITY ISSUE FISCAL YEAR --------------- PRINCIPAL ---------------- INTEREST --------------- TOTAL -------------- 1988-89 5299,250 5433,913 5733,163 1989-90 299,250 412,217 711,467 1990-91 299,250 390,521 689,771 1991-92 299,250 368,826 668,076 1992-93 299,250 347,130 646,380 1993-94 299,250 325,434 624,684 1994-95 299,250 303,739 602,989 1995-96 299,250 282,043 581,293 1996-97 299,250 260,348 559,598 1997-98 299,250 238,652 537,902 1998-99 299,250 216,956 516,206 1999-2000 299,250 195,261 494,511 2000-01 299,250 173,565 472,815 2001-02 299,250 151,869 451,119 2002-03 299,250 130,174 429,424 2003-04 299,250 108,478 407,728 2004-05 299,250 86,783 386,033 2005-06 299,250 65,087 364,337 2006-07 299,250 43,391 342,641 2007-08 299,250 ---------------- 21,696 ------- 320,946 TOTALS 55,985,000 -------- 54,556,081 -------------- 510,541,081 ' .. r•- ~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JANUARY 12, 1988 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING APPLICATION TO THE VIRGINIA PUBLIC SCHOOL AUTHORITY TO BORROW MONEY FOR CAPITAL PROJECTS FOR SCHOOL PURPOSES WHEREAS, feasibility studies have been conducted at Back Creek and Bent Mountain Elementary Schools in Roanoke County to determine building needs based on projected population growth in the areas feeding the respective schools and on educational programs; and WHEREAS, these studies have concluded that renovation in addition to existing facilities would be most feasible; and WHEREAS, on December 10, 1987, the County School Board of Roanoke County adopted a resolution authorizing application to the Virginia Public School Authority for these purposes; and WHEREAS, on November 5, 1985, the voters of Roanoke County approved a general obligation bond referendum to, in part, undertake certain capital improvements to the old William Byrd Junior High School in order to renovate that structure for school administration offices; and WHEREAS, further studies now indicate that additional funds are necessary for this renovation. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervi- sors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that the application of the County School Board of Roanoke County to borrow money for capital projects for school purposes is hereby approved and supported. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this approval and support includes a sum of money not to exceed $3,700,000 for renovation and additions to the Back Creek and Bent Mountain elementary schools, a sum. of money not to exceed $200,000 for asbestos removal, a sum of money not to exceed. $85,000 for a library addition to the Bent Mountain elementary school, and a sum of. money not to exceed $2,000,000 to complete the renovation work for the old William Byrd Junior High School Building for the relocation of school administration offices. FURTHER that the Deputy Clerk is hereby directed to forward a certified copy of this resolution to the County School Board of Roanoke County and the Virginia Public School Authority. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JANUARY 12, 1988 RESOLUTION 11288-4 AUTHORIZING APPLICATION TO THE VIRGINIA PUBLIC SCHOOL AUTHORITY TO BORROW MONEY FOR CAPITAL PROJECTS FOR SCHOOL PURPOSES WHEREAS, feasibility studies have been conducted at Back Creek and Bent Mountain Elementary Schools in Roanoke County to determine building needs based on projected population growth in the areas feeding the respective schools and on educational programs; and WHEREAS, these studies have concluded that renovation in addition to existing facilities would be most feasible; and WHEREAS, on December 10, 1987, the County School Board of Roanoke County adopted a resolution authorizing application to the Virginia Public School Authority for these purposes; and WHEREAS, on November 5, 1985, the voters of Roanoke County approved a general obligation bond referendum to, in part, undertake certain capital improvements to the old William Byrd Junior High School in order to renovate that structure for school administration offices; and WHEREAS, further studies now indicate that additional funds are necessary for this renovation. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervi- sors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that the application of the County School Board of Roanoke County to borrow money for capital projects for school purposes is hereby approved and supported. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this approval and support includes a sum of money not to exceed $3,985,000 for renovation and additions to the Back Creek and Bent Mountain elementary schools. FURTHER that the Deputy Clerk is hereby directed to forward a certified copy of this resolution to the County School Board of Roanoke County and the Virginia Public School Authority. On motion of Supervisor Garrett, seconded by Supervisor Nickens, and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None A COPY - TESTE: ~• Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors 1/13/88 cc: File Clerk, Roanoke County School Board Virginia Public School Authority John M. Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator Diane Hyatt, Director of Finance ~i ITEM NUMBER ~- AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE IN ROANOKE, VA., ON OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRA'T'ION CENTER TUESDAY, MEETING DATE: January 12, 1988 SUBJECT: Airport Renovation Project COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR' S COMMENTS: `~G~ (~.~`~ -r _ SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: On October 13, 1987, the Board of Supervisors approved the program concept for the Airport Renovation Project with a total budget of $25,587,477. This original budget projection included $4,700,000 of an anticipated federal commitment. The Airport Commission has now received a commitment from the federal govern- ment in the form of a letter of approval and an allocation for an amount not to exceed $4,885,585. This additional $185,585 will reduce the anticipated $7,300,000 local amount to a residual of $7,114,415. Exhibit 1 outlines the capital expenditures for the Airport facilities and the revised funding of this project. FISCAL IMPACT: The County has signed an agreement to participate in the operating loss of the Regional Airport. Debt retirement will have a major impact upon the level of expenditures for the Regional Airponue bondss which w 11 need toe be eissued lforh the proe amount of reve ject. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the components of the Airport Renovation Project and the revised funding sources. SUBMITTED BY: ~~~rirtscf ~ ~~ Diane D. Hyat Director of Finance APPROVED: G~~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ~... ~~- r, .. ----------- ------------------------ VOTE Approved ( > Motion by: Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred To ACTION No Yes Abs Garrett Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers 1, , g7~BIT I AIRPORT FACILITY SU1~4IARY OF FUAIDING AAID gXpF,~ITURE.BUDGST SUMMARY OF FUNDING .. ..... ~ o.~,~. $ 9,186,324 Federal Funds 6,211,458 State Funds 1,346,000 Commission (local) 729,280 County of Roanoke (local) 1,000,000 City of Salem (local) 7,114,415 Revenue Bond Issue $25,587,477 EXPENDITURE BUDGET $ 2,045,884 Engineering 175,000 FAA Glideslope 25,000 Appalachian Power 890,000 Land Acquisition 8,687,112 Site Preparation 9,487,800 Terminal Building 990,000 Loading Bridges 440,000 Furnishings 1,811,681 Construction Contingency 760,000 Construction Short Term Financing 275,000 Bond Issuance Expense $25,587,477 airport~Commission W. Rcbc.~rt Herbert, Chairman Lee Garrett, Vice Chairman Joel M. Schlanger fob L. Johnson Kit B. Kiser Robert C. Poole, Airport Manager Honorable Mayor and Members Roanoke City Council Dear Members of Council: 1635 Aviation Drive Roanoke,~rginia 24012 (703) 981-2531 .. ~-- January 6, 1988 1'Ct..r11 VVI~ + /'11 Honorable Chairman and Members Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Dear Members of the Board: Subject: Airport Terminal Development Project - Capital Expenditure Approval I. Background: A. Council and Board approved on October 12 and 13, 1987, respectively, authorization to proceed and a project development budget of $25,587,477. Please note the attached report from the Commission dated October 7, 1987. B. Budget approval anticipated the commitment of an additional total amount of $4,700,000 from the Federal government during fiscal years 1988-89 and 1989-90. C. Commission has received a commitment from the Federal government in the form of a letter of approval and allocation for an amount not to exceed $4,885,585 for eligible project costs during Federal fiscal years 1988, 1989, 1990, and 1991. This commitment is from entitlement funds from the newly authorized Aviation Bill. Discretionary funding is anticipated in the total amount of $2,200,000 which will offset dollar for dollar the otherwise committed entitlement funding in the last two years. Any entitlement funding offset by discretionary funding will be made available, through grant amendments, for other anticipated future capital expenditures such as taxiway and runway pavement overlays and CFR equipment replacement and/or supplementation. II. Current Situation: A. .Commission needs to make the contractual commitment to Branch Highways, Inc. for the full scope of the site development work in accordance with the attached report dated January 6, 1988 to the Commission. B. Specific capital expenditure approval for the terminal development complex project from Roanoke City and Roanoke County is requested in accordance with the budget approved on October 12 and 13, 1987, respectively, as such budget and timing for reimbursement are modified by the commitment of Honorable Mayor and Members, Roanoke City Council ' Honorable Chairman and Members, Roanoke County Board of Supervisors ~._; f~ Page 2 $4~g_ g~ 585 over a time period of not later than 1991 rather than $4,700,000 over a time period of not later than 1990. III. Issues: p., Project Timm B, Budget Modification C. Legal Commitment IV. Alternatives: A. Council and Board a rove s ecific ca ital ex enditures as provided in the enabling legislation and contractual agreement between the City, County, and Commission, for the Project at a project cost not to exceed X25,587,477 as said budget was outlined in the October 7, 1987 report modified only to the extent of the latest timing to rec000eover fiscal reimbursement from FAA be amended from $4,7~_ years 1988-89 and 1989-90 to $4,885,585 over federal fiscal year-1988, 1989, 1990 and 1991. Additional 1885 reduced the anticipated $7,300,000 local amount to a residual of $7,1~ 5. See Exhibit I for listing of capital expenditures to be approved plus the revised funding for the budget. 1. Project timing previously planned will be unaffected. 2. Budget modification will be authorized. 3, Legal commitment will be specifically stated. B, Council and/or Board refrain from approving capital expenditures and, thereby, refrain from approving the budget modification. 1, Project timin will be negatively impacted. Commission must then decide whether or not to stop the project or seek other legal recourses depending on the stated, if any, wishes of the City and Board. 2. Budget modification will not be made at this time. 3, Legal commitment will not be specifically stated. V. Recommendation and Re uq est: Council and Board approve the specific capital expenditure for the Roanoke Regional Airport Terminal Development Project, with budget modifications, in accordance with Alternative "A". Respectfully submitted, ,~~ ~~ W. Robert Herbert, Chairman Roanoke Regional Airport Commission ..._ - Honorable Mayor and Members, Roanoke City Council „~-- Honorable Chairman and Member~.~, Roanoke County Board of Supervisors .,. Page 3 WRH:KBK:afm Attachments cc: Legal Counsel Treasurer Airport Manager Roanoke City Manager Roanoke County Administrator Roanoke City Attorney Roanoke County Attorney Engineer AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JANUARY 12, 1988 F- `". --~' RESOLUTION APPROVING SPECIFIC CAPITAL EXPENDITURES BY THE ROANOKE REGIONAL AIR- PORT COMMISSION UPON CERTAIN TERMS AND CONDITIONS WHEREAS, Section 17.(b) of the contract between the City of Roanoke, Roanoke County, and the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission provides that the Commission shall prepare and submit for approval any proposed capital expenditure exceeding $100,000 to benefit five or more accounting periods; and WHEREAS, by report dated October 7, 1987, a copy of which is on file with the Deputy Clerk, the Roanoke Regional Air- port Commission has submitted a request that the County approve a capital expenditure by the Commission for the Airport Terminal Development Project in the proposed budget amount of $25,587,477 as set forth in said report; and WHEREAS, by resolution dated October 13, 1987, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, approved autho- rization to proceed and a project development budget of $25,587,477; and WHEREAS, by report dated January 6, 1988, a copy of which is on file with the Deputy Clerk, the Roanoke Regional Air- port Commission has submitted a request that the County approve specific capital expenditures by the Commission for the Roanoke Regional Airport Terminal Development Project which will require capital expenditures in a total estimated amount of $25,587,477. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervi- sors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that the following specific capital expenditures by the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission in connection with the Roanoke Regional Airport Terminal Develop- ment project are hereby approved: ~:~ Engineering Design Through Construction $ 2,045,884 FAA Glidescope 175,000 000 25 Appalachian Power , 000 890 Land Acquisition , Site Preparation (cleaning and grading) Roads, Parking and Ramps 8,687,112 Terminal Building 9,487,800 Loading Bridges 990,000 Furnishings 440,000 $ 22,740,796 Construction Contingency $ 1,811,681 Construction Short-Term 760,000 Financing 275 000 Bond Issue Expenses $ 2,846,681 $ 25 587.477 AND FURTHER, that certain budget modifications and re- wired funding sources are hereby approved, as more particularly set forth in the report to this Board by the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission dated January 6, 1988. AND FURTHER, that the County Administrator and Deputy Clerk are authorized to execute and attest, respectively, on be- half of the County, any further documentation, in form approved by the County Attorney, necessary to evidence said approval. W. Robert Herbert, Chairman Lee Garrett, Vice Chairman Joei M. Schlanger Bob L. Johnson Kit B. Kiser Robert C. Poole, Airport Manager ivvv/'wivuv~ ~ vi~vV Roanoke, Virginia 24012 -~ (703) 981-2531 Honorable Mayor and Members Roanoke City Council Dear Members of Council: January 6, 1988 t`~ ,~~ a~o~r Honorable Chairman and Members Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Dear Members of the Board: Subject: Airport Terminal Development Project - Capital Expenditure Approval I. Background: A. Council and Board approved on October 12 and 13, 1987, respectively, authorization to proceed and a project development budget of $25,587,477. Please note the attached report from the Commission dated October 7, 1987. B. Budget approval anticipated the commitment of an additional total amount of $4,700,000 from the Federal government during fiscal years 1988-89 and 1989-90. C. Commission has received a commitment from the Federal government in the form of a letter of approval and allocation for an amount not to exceed $4,885,585 for eligible project costs during Federal fiscal years 1988, 1989, 1990, and 1991. This commitment is from entitlement funds from the newly authorized Aviation Bill. Discretionary funding is anticipated in the total amount of $2,200,000 which will offset dollar for dollar the otherwise committed entitlement funding in the last two years. Any entitlement funding offset by discretionary funding will be made available, through grant amendments, for other anticipated future capital expenditures such as taxiway and runway pavement overlays and CFR equipment replacement and/or supplementation. II. Current Situation: A, Commission needs to make the contractual commitment to Branch Highways, Inc. for the full scope of the site development work in accordance with the attached report dated January 6, 1988 to the Commission. B, ~ecific capital expenditure approval for the terminal development complex project from Roanoke City and Roanoke County is requested in accordance with the budget approved on October 12 and 13, 1987, respectively, as such budget and timing for reimbursement are modified by the commitment of Honorable Mayor and Members, Roanoke City Council Honorable Chairman and Mert~ers,~P~oanoke County Board of Supervisors Page 2 X4,885,585 over a time period of not later than 1991 rather than $4,700,000 over a time period of not later than 1990. III. Issues: A. Proiect Timing B. Budget Modification C. Legal Commitment IV. Alternatives: A. Council and Board a prove specific capital expenditures as provided in the enabling legislation and contractual agreement between the City, County, and Commission, for the Project at a project cost not to exceed $25,587,477 as said budget was outlined in the October 7, 1987 report modified only to the extent of the latest timing to receive reimbursement from FAA be amended from $4,700,000 over fiscal years 1988-89 and 1989-90 to $4,885,585 over federal fiscal year 1988, 1989, 1990 and 1991. Additional 185 585 reduced the anticipated $7,300,000 local amount to a residual of $7,114,415. See Exhibit I for listing of capital expenditures to be approved plus the revised funding for the budget. 1. Project timing previously planned will be unaffected. 2. Budget modification will be authorized. 3. Legal commitment will be specifically stated. B. Council and/or Board refrain from approving capital expenditures and, thereby, refrain from approving the budget modification. 1. Proiect timing will be negatively impacted. Commission must then decide whether or not to stop the project or seek other legal recourses depending on the stated, if any, wishes of the City and Board. 2. Budget modification will not be made at this time. 3. Legal commitment will not be specifically stated. V. Recommendation and Request: Council and Board approve the specific capital expenditure for the Roanoke Regional Airport Terminal Development Project, with budget modifications, in accordance with Alternative "A". Respectfully submitted, `_; .~ ~-1.,. W. Robert Herbert, Chairman Roanoke Regional Airport Commission Honorable Mayor and Members, Roanoke City Council Honorable Chairman and Members, Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Page 3 WRH:KBK:afm Attachments cc: Legal Counsel Treasurer Airport Manager Roanoke City Manager Roanoke County Administrator Roanoke City Attorney Roanoke County Attorney Engineer AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JANUARY 12, 1988 RESOLUTION 11288-5 APPROVING SPECIFIC CAPITAL EXPENDITURES BY THE ROANOKE REGIONAL AIRPORT COMMISSION UPON CERTAIN TERMS AND CONDITIONS WHEREAS, Section 17.(b) of the contract between the City of Roanoke, Roanoke County, and the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission provides that the Commission shall prepare and submit for approval any proposed capital expenditure exceeding $100,000 to benefit five or more accounting periods; and WHEREAS, by report dated October 7, 1987, a copy of which is on file with the Deputy Clerk, the Roanoke Regional Air- port Commission has submitted a request that the County approve a capital expenditure by the Commission for the Airport Terminal Development Project in the proposed budget amount of $25,587,477 as set forth in said report; and WHEREAS, by resolution dated October 13, 1987, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, approved autho- rization to proceed and a project development budget of $25,587,477; and WHEREAS, by report dated January 6, 1988, a copy of which is on file with the Deputy Clerk, the Roanoke Regional Air- port Commission has submitted a request that the County approve specific capital expenditures by the Commission for the Roanoke Regional Airport Terminal Development Project which will require capital expenditures in a total estimated amount of $25,587,477. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervi- sors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that the following specific capital expenditures by the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission in connection with the Roanoke Regional Airport Terminal Develop- ment project are hereby approved: Engineering Design Through Construction $ 2,045,884 FAA Glidescope 175,000 Appalachian Power 25,000 Land Acquisition 890,000 Site Preparation (cleaning and grading) Roads, Parking and Ramps 8,687,112 Terminal Building 9,487,800 Loading Bridges 990,000 Furnishings 440,000 $ 22,740,796 Construction Contingency $ 1,811,681 Construction Short-Term Financing 760,000 Bond Issue Expenses 275,000 S 2,846,681 $ 25 587,477 AND FURTHER, that certain budget modifications and re- wised funding sources are hereby approved, as more particularly set forth in the report to this Board by the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission dated January 6, 1988. AND FURTHER, that the County Administrator and Deputy Clerk are authorized to execute and attest, respectively, on be- half of the County, any further documentation, in form approved by the County Attorney, necessary to evidence said approval. On motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by Supervisor Johnson, and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None A COPY - TESTE: Mary H. A len, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors 1/13/88 cc: File Clerk of Roanoke City Council Members of the Regional Airport Commission John M. Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator Diane Hyatt, Director of Finance ITEM NUMBER /"-,! AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE IN ROANOKE, VA., ON OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER TUESDAY, MEETING DATE: January 12, 1.988 SUBJECT: Ordinance amending Chapter 7, "Building Regulations," of the Roanoke County Code by the imposition of fees for cross connection inspections COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~w~ „ Q SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Section 6.00, "Cross Connection and Backflow Prevention Con- trol in Waterworks," of the Commonwealth of Virginia Waterworks Regulations requires each locality to have an active cross connec- tion inspection program. The primary reason for such legislation was to protect and prevent the contamination of public water sys- tems from private, commercial, and industrial sources. The pro- tection of public water systems are insured by devices called "cross connection devices" or "backflow preventors." These de- vices prevent the possible backflow of contaminated water to enter the public system. These devices are inspected annually in order to ensure each device is working properly. Roanoke County started an active cross connection inspection program in the summer of 1977. During 1987, the Construction Building Service cross co nection inspector performed 639 cross connection inspections. T ese inspections were performed in addi- tion to other daily buildi g and plumbing inspection responsibili- ties. Currently no fees a e collected for the cross connection inspection services. However, with a thirty dollar ($30) fee per inspection. Roanoke County could collect an additional $20,790 in revenue. This addition in revenue could pay for the cost of the cross connection inspection program. Section 15.1-29.14 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, provides that notice of all fees imposed by a County pursuant to Section 15.1-292 (Public Utilities) will be advertised once a week for two successive weeks in a newspaper of general circula- tion and that such fees shall be enacted by ordinance following a public hearing. Notice of the public hearing imposing a cross connection fee was published in the Roanoke Times and World News on December 29, 1987, and January 5, 1988. The first reading of ~-/ the proposed ~ d c hearinas willdbenhelduonyJanua y 2 6, 1988second reading and p 9 FISCAL IMPACT: Roanoke County would collect approximately $20,790 annually in additional revenue from cross connection inspections. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the following: 1. That a thirty dollar ($30) cross connection fee be imposed and become effective January 26, 1988. Respectfully submitted, cJ J mes T. Nining r, Jr ief Building Official ---------------------- ------------------- ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs Approved ( ) Motion by: Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred To Garrett Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, ON TUESDAY, JANUARY 12, 1988 ~~ - / ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 7, BUILDING REGULATIONS," OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE BY THE IMPOSITION OF FEES FOR CROSS CONNECTION INSPECTIONS WHEREAS, Sections 6.00, "Cross Connection and Backflow Prevention Control in Waterworks," of the Commonwealth of Virgin- is Waterworks Regulations requires each locality to have an active cross connection inspection program to protect and prevent the contamination of public water systems from private, commer- cial, and industrial sources; and WHEREAS, Roanoke County has an active cross connection inspection program coordinated through its Construction Building Services Department; and WHEREAS, no fees are imposed for the performance of cross connection inspections; and WHEREAS, notice of the public hearing imposing a cross connection inspection fee was published in the Roanoke Times and World News on December 29, 1987, and January 5, 1988; and WHEREAS, a first reading of the proposed ordinance was held on January 12, 1988; the second reading was held on January 26, 1988. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervi- sors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That effective January 26, 1988, a fee of Thirty Dollars ($30) for each cross connection inspection shall be im- posed. ter"' ITEM NUMBER -~"" '~ / AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER IN ROANOKE, VA., ON TUESDAY, MEETING DATE: January 12, 1988 SUBJECT: Ordinance amending Chapter 7, "Building Regulations" of the Roanoke County Code by repealing Article III, Sec- tion 7-31, "General Contractors' Bond," Section 7-32, "Plumbing Contractors' Bond," and Section 7-33, "Electrical Contractors' Bond" COUNTY//n ADMINISTRATOR ' SCO~PMI'M•~~E~-N-~-T~S~~"~: G ~ `~ SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: State law requires that all contractors who perform work in the State of Virginia for more than $1,500 be registered with the Virginia State Department of Commerce. Each contractor applies to the State Department of Commerce to be either "Class A" or "Class B" registered. Class A Contractor Class B Performs work over $40,000 Perform. and exempt from local $40,000 contractors' bonds by State law. bond00g Contractor work less than and more than Subject to local requirements. Currently, all Class B contractors who perform work in Roanoke County are required to have a $5,000 bond. After researching our own Class B contractor bonding require- ments and those same requirements in other localities, it was determined that our requirements are not needed. The reasons for this conclusion are as follows: 1. The State Department of Commerce has created the Virgin- ia Contractors' Transaction Recovery Fund System that protects and can reimburse citizens from improper or illegal work contractors perform. 2. Since established in June of 1975, Roanoke County has acted only once to collect on a Class B contractors' bond. This proved to be very costly. 3. Twenty-six other localities were researched. It was found that eleven localities do not require Class B contractors' bonds. Some localities actually eliminated these bond require- 1 .,.~' - / ments when the Virginia Contractors' Transaction Recovery Fund System was established. Fifteen localities still require bonds; however, of the fifteen, only two have ever acted to collect on a Class B contractors' bond. 4. The high cost of staff time is prohibitive to Roanoke County to administer Class B contractors' bond requirements. Many work hours are spent yearly due to filing and checking active contractors' bonds. 5. That the first reading of this ordinance was held on December 15, 1987; the second reading was held on January 12, 1988. FISCAL IMPACT: None. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors adopt these ordinance amendments. Respectfully submitted, aul M. Mahoney County Attorney -------------------------ACTION VOTE r~., v c c A h Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred To Motion by: Garrett Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers 2 --l AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRCENTER HONDTUESDAY,ROJANUARYCO~NT1988MINIS'i'RA'PlON ORDINANCE AMENDING Cf3APTER 7, "BUILDING REGULATIONS" OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE BY REPEALING ARTICLE III, SECTION 7-31, "GENERAL CONTRACTORS' BOND," SECTION 7-32, "PLUMBING CONTRACTORS' BOND," AND SECTION 7-33, "ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS' BOND BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the f first reading of this ordinance was held on December 15, 1987; the second reading was held on January 12, 1988; and 2. That Chapter 7, "Building Regulations" of the Roa- poke County Code is hereby amended by the repeal of the following sections: ARTICLE III. CONTRACTORS AND TRADESMAN DIVISION 1. GENERALLY See:-~-31:--6ene~al-eentraeterss-benel- ----------fa}--E~e~p-pe~sec~-eagaged-le-the-business-a€-eeast~uet- }ng_ buildings- ln- tl~e- eeunty- s~iall- glee- a- geeel- ar~el- su€€lelent annual-beael ; -~~-the-a~teur~t-e€-tern-tl~eusar~d-e7ellars-{$lA ; A89}-with appra~aeel- ee~pe~ate- ssrety : - -'~l~e-bend- shall- ~ema~~- ~n- €ell- €eree grid-e€€eet-until-July-3l-€ellawing-tl~e-yearlr~-~ableb-sueh-bene7-is ~a~itten ----------fb}--T~ie-bead-~equi~ed-bp-this-seetien-s~iall-be-se-een- ditier~ed- that- all- eenst~uetien- week- peg€e~med- by- e~- under tl~e super~isien- a€- tl~e- eent~aeter- s~iall- be- in- aeee~danee- wit~i- tl~e g~e~lslens-e€-this-el~apte~-aid-te-lsdema~€y-the-bea~el-e€-super~i- 1 seas- e~- €~ie- e~aaea- a€- €he- p~epe~€p- aga}as€- dax~ages- ~~- ~easea- e€ sap-de€ee~-a~}s}~~-eta€-a€-s~el~-seas€~r~e€}ea-sad-9~ia}}-be-€e~€~e~ eead}~}eaed-€e-~e€r~ael-€e-€lie-l~ea~d-a€-sspe~~}9e~s-ea-€~ie-p~epe~€~ e~aae~-sap-meaep-e~peaded-€e-ee~~ee~-sap-~ae~k-e~-asps}~-sap-elamage deae- e~- eae~see7- ~~- €l~e- esa~~ae€e~- }~- €l~e- e~eer~€}ea- a€- h}s- week St~el~-lead-sY~a}}-be-€a~€~ie~-eead}€}seed-€e-same-harm}ess-sap-pe~- sea-€ea-wl~em-€l~e-sea€~ae~ea-e~-l~}s-e~p}epees-snap-de-eeas~~r~e€}ea e~-€~~a}sly-~a€e~}a}s-sad-€l~a~-lie-~a}}}-pap-a}}-€ees-sad-a}}-€}ass sad-peas}~}es-paepe~}p-}~npesed-r~pea-h}r~-€e~-~}e}a~}ea-e€-sap-p~e- ~}s}ea-a€-€1~}s-ehap€e~:--~€-€he-sea€~ae€e~-€a}}s;-ae€r~ses-e~-ae- g}eels-€e-make-sr~eY~-~ae~k-sea€e~r~-€e-~h}s-ehap~e~ ; -as-d}aee~ed-gyp €l~e- ~r~}}d}ag- a€€}e}a}- }a- a- ~a~}€€ea- e~elea; - ~l~e- eer~a€p- a€€e~aep sl~a}}-ae~}€p-€~ie-sr~~e~p-ea-€he-~eae7; -}a-w~}€}ag; -sad-}€-~l~e-sr~~e- €p-€a}}s-€e-Make-st~el~-ee~~ee€}ea-~a}~h}a-a}gh€-{8}-daps-a€€e~-sc~eY~ ae€}ee- }s- ~+a}}ed- €e- €l~e- }as€- kae~aa- addaess- a€- €l~e- sere€p; - the semer~a€- a€- €l~e- dead- sl~a}}- fie- €e~€e}fed- fie- ~l~e- l~eaed- a€- sepe~~}- -- - - - - - - - - {e}- - ~l~e- l~aad- ~eqa}red- gyp- ~h}s- seed}ea- sl~a}}- be- ap- p~e~ed-bp- €l~e-eet~a€p- ad~t}a}s~~a~e~-sad-deees}€ed-w}~l~- the-eeea~p e}e~k-sad-sl~a}}-he-aeaewed-aaat~a}}p-ea-ea-be€e~e-~t~}p-3}: See---~-3~---P}t~m~}ag-eea~~ae€e~s'--dead: ----------{a}--Be€eye-sap-pe~sea-sl~a}}-eagage-}a-€he-~r~s}sees-e€ a- p}s~~}ag- eea~~ae~e~- }a- €he- eer~a€p; - lie-epee}h-- € he sees€p-a}e~k-a-geed-sad-sr~€€}e}ea€-lead; -}a-~he-9sx~-a€-lea-€l~ea- saad-de}}ass-{$}A; A86}; -app~e~ed-~~*-€l~e-ese~a~p-adt~}a}s€aa~e~-sad eead}~}eaed-€l~a€-sae~i-pe~sea-~a}}}-€a}€l€r~}}p-else~~e-a}}-€l~e-}a~as 2 .~- / peg€a~a~eg- €e- ~}t~x~b~sg;- d~a~a- }a~}erg;- b}aslr~ag- er~d- e~ea~a€~r~g; €}~a~-~~ie-~ea~el-a€-s~~e~~}sees-s~ia~~-~e-~~e1e~~~€~eel-a~el-sa~ee7-l~a~~t- }ess- €~et~- a~~- a}aims- a~~s~ag- €~et~= eee~der~~s- aed- damage- a€- aa~ el~a~ae€e~- vaba€see~e~- eased- bp- €be- seg~~gesee- a€- sr~el~- pe~see- e~ ~~- aap- e~be~- a~€a~€~€~~- e~- ~t~adegaa~e- dae~k- dene- b~- }~~m- e~- l~l-s ages~s-e~-emp}epees;-asd-~Y~a~-saeb-pe~ses-w~~~-ma~s~e~e-}e-a-sa€e ee~e7~~~e~;-€e~-a-~er~ed-a€-ene-peas;-a~~-el~~ebes-and-exea~a~~er~s c~l~~el~-map-be-eper~ed-~~-aap-s€~ee€-~s-€1~e-~e~€e~mat~ee-e€-asp-~~r~mb- }~~- vae~k- aed- €a~€Y~e~- €~ia€- a~~- d~~€-and- e~~-e~-ma€e~~a~- e~ea~a€ed wl:}}- be- yep}seed- ~r~- a- geed- eeedl=~~e~- w~€1~- s~m~~a~- ma~e~~a~s: Wl~e~e-sael~-exea~a~~e~-~s-made-~~-ae-r~~~a~ed-s€~ee€-e~-ar~p-s€~ee~ ~a~ed- ~a~~l~- el~e~~- e~- maeadam; - €be- weed- us€~ee€ ~ „- as- l~e~e~n- used ; sl~a~~-ap~~p-€e-s~dewa}}~s;-er~~bs;-g~€€e~s;-aed-s€~ee€-pa~~~g: ----------~b}--~l~e-bead-~eelr~~~ed-bp-~l~~s-see~~ea-sl~a~~-be-ma~a- €a~aed-~~--€s~~-€e~ee-aid-a€€ee~-a~-a~~-~~mes: See:-~-33:--~}ee~~}eat-eea~~ae€e~s'--bevel: ----------fa}--~s-seed-~~-~H~s-see~~er~;-~l~e-~e~r~t-ue}ee~~~ea~-eea- b~ae~e~-' -sl~a~~-mean-aep-pe~ser~-w~ie-~s-engaged-~s-Abe-bss}less-e€ ; e~-wl~e- ~ep~esen€s- l~~mse~€- €e- ~l~e- ~t~b~~e- as- being- e~-gaged- ~~- €l~e br~s~ness-e€;-~ns~a}~~ng;-enee€~~~-e~-~e~a~n~ng-epee€~~ea~-w~~~ng~ €}~~e~~es ; -app}~anees ; - a~~a~a€c~s- e~- de~~ees- wb~el~- aye- fie- be- rased €e~- €l~e- €~ansm~ss~en- a€- epee€~~e- er~~~en€- €e~- }}gb€ ; - ~iea€ ; - ~ewe~ en-e€l~e~-e}ee~~~ea~-~r~~peses-w~~b}n-~be-eer~n~p;-e~-wbe-een€nae~s w~€b-a€l~e~s-be-de-sael~-we~ie- ----------~b}--~~enp-e}ee€~~ea~-eer~~~ae€en-sl~a~~-~l:~e-a-geed-and sr~€€~e~en~- annr~a~- bend- ~~- €l~e- sr~m- a€- €en- €I~er~sand- de}}ass T'- / {$}A;eee};-w}~1~-app~e~ed-ee~peea~e-se~~e~p;-sr~el~-~esd-fie-Tema}s-}s €s}}- €e~ee- asd- e~~ee~- r~s~}}- BeeemHe~- 3}- ~e}}ew}sg- ~~e- peas- }s vale}el~-}~-}s-vae}~~es: --Sc~e~i-l~esd-si~a}}-~e-se-easel}~}esed-~l~a~-a}} e}ee~~}ea}- week- pee~e~med- bp- e~- r~sde~- ape- se~pe~~}s}es- e~- se~el~ ees~~ae~e~-sl~a}}-~e-~s-aeee~dasee-w~~~-p~e~}s~ess-el=-~l~~s-el~ap~e~ aid-~e-}sdems~€p-~~e-~ea~d-e~-sr~pe~~}sees-e~-~l~e-ewse~-e~-p~epe~- ~p-aga}ss~-damage-lip-ceases-e€-asp-de~ee~-}s-w}~}sg-e~-~~e-epes- ~sg-a€-s~~ee~s : --Ssel~-~esd-sl~a}}--9e-~a~~l~e~-eese7}~}eseel-~e-~efr~sel fie- ~l~e- dead- e~- sspe~~}sees- e~- ~l~e- p~epe~~p- ewse~-asp- mesep- e~- pesded-~e-a®~~ee~-asp-week-e~-~epa}~-asp-damage-dese-e~-eaased-Hp ~l~e-ees~~ae~e~-}s-ape-e~ees~}es-e~-~}s-we~l~-asd-~s-same-l~a~m}ess asp-pe~ses-~e~-wl~em-~l~e-ees~~ae~e~-e~-~}s-emp}epees-map-de-e}ee- ~~}ea}- we~l~- e~- ~s~s}ski- ma~e~}a}s- asd- ~l~a~- lie- w}}}-pap- a}}- fees asd-a}}-1=}ses-asd-pesa}~}es-p~epe~}p-}mpesed-apes-~i~m-~e~-~}e}a- ~}es-e~-asp-p~e~r~s}es-a€-~~}s-el~ap~e~: ----------{e}--}€-a-l~esded-a}ee~~}ea}-ees~~ae~e~-~a}}s; -~e€c~ses e~-seg}eels-~e-ma}~e-l~~s-a~e~}~-ee~€e~m-~e-~~i}s-el~ap~e~ ; -as-d~~ee~ed ~p-~l~e-~s}}d}sg-a€~}e}a}-}s-a-w~}1=des-e~de~; -~l~e-eer~s~p-a~~e~sep s}~a}}-se~}€p-~l~e-sa~e~p-as-~~e-~esd;-}s-w~}~~~g;-asd-}~-~Y~e-se~~e- ~p-~a}}s-~e-ma}~e-ssel~-ee~~ee~}es-w}~~}s-e}gl~~-{g}-daps-a~~e~-se~e~i set}ee- }s- ma}}ed- fie- ~Y~e- }asd- }sews- address- e~- ~~ie- se~~e~p ; - ~l~e amess~- e~- ~~e- ~esd- sl~a}}- be- ~e~€e}fed- fie- ~l~e-bead- e~- sape~~}- s6~s: -- - - - - - - - - {d}- -'}be- besd- ~eelt~}red- bp- ~b}s- seed}es- sl~a}}- be- ap- p~e~ed-bp- ~l~e-eess~p- aelm~s~s~~a~e~-asd-depes~~ed-w~~l~- ~l~e-eess~p e}e~}~-asd-~esewed-asst~a}}p-es-e~-be~s~e-Beeembe~-3}- 4 -1 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect on January 12, 1988. AT A REGULAR MEETING DFATHTHEOROANOKESCOUNTYSADMINISTRATOON COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HEL CENTER, ON TUESDAY, JANUARY 12, 1988 ORDINANCE 11288-6 AMENDING CHAPTER 7, "BUILDING REG LATU IONS" OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE BY REPEALING ARTICLE III, SECTION 7-31, GENERAL CONTRACTORS' BOND," "PLUMBING SECTION 7-32, CONTRACTORS' BOND," AND SECTION 7-33, "ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS' BOND BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the first reading of this ordinance was held on December 15, 1987; the second reading was held on January 12, 1988; and 2. That Chapter 7, "Building Regulations" of the Roa- noke County Code is hereby amended by the repeal of the following sections: ARTICLE III. CONTRACTORS AND TRADESMAN DIVISION 1. GENERALLY See:-~-3};--6er~e~al-eent~aeters'--ba~d- ----------{a}--E~e~p-perae~--e~gae~eel-ln-tl~e-badness-ef-eenstraet- }~g- yallellae~s- }~- tl~e- eear~t~- sl~a}}- glee- a- geed- at~el- saff~ele~t ar~naa}-yer~el; -~~-tie-ameaat-ef-tee-theasa-~d-della~s-{$18-, AAA}-~alth app~eyeel- ee~pe~ate- sa~ety-- - Tl~e- l~er~d- s~iall- ~ema~~- }r~-fall- fe~ee anel-etfeet-astll-Jaly-3}-fe}le~aing-tl~e-yeas-}n-whlel~-sael~-bend-ls ~arltte~- ----------{b}--Tl~e-be~e7-ree~al~ed-by-th}s-seetlen-shall-be-se-een- e7ltler~ee7- that- all- eer~straet~ee-~- werl~- pe~fermeel- by- er- a-~de~- the sape~~lsle~- ef- tie- ee~t~aete~- shall- lie- ln- aeee~ela~ee- w~tl~- tY~e p~e*alslens-ef-Mils-el~apte~-and-te-l~de~tnlfy-tl~e-bead-af-saper~rl- sees- e~- ~l~e- ewr~e~- e~- ~l~e- p~epe~~p- a~a~~s~- damages- yp- ~ease~- e~ amp-de~ee~-a~~s~~g-et~~-e~-se~e~i-eer~s~~t~e~}ems-arid-spa}}-ye-~~~~l~e~ eer~d~~~e~ed-~e-~e~ase7-~e-~~e-Hea~el-e~-sspe~~~se~s-ee-~~e-p~epe~~p e~ ended-~s-ee~~ee~-ate ~ae~k-e~-~e a~~-ar~p-elamage ~- ~ ecar~e~-ar~p-mer~ep- p der~e- e~- eaased- ~~- ~~ie- eer~~~ae~e~- ~~- ~~ie- e~eet~~~er~- e~- ~i~s- ~ae~k- Sse~-~er~el-sl~a~~-be-~s~~~e~-eer~d~~}a~eel-~e-sa~e-l~a~m~ess-ar~p-pe~- sere-~e~-wl~em-~~e-eer~~eae~e~-e~-1~}s-emp}epees-map-de-eess~~se~~er~ e~-€~~~~sl~-ma~e~~a~s-aid-~l~a~-Yee-~a~~~-pap-a~~-fees-ar~el-a}}-~~r~es grid-per~a}~~es-p~epe~}p-~mpeseel-~per~-~~m-~s~-~~e}a~~er~-e~-ar~p-p~e- ~~s~ar~-a~-~l~~s-el~ap~e~---~~-~l~e-ee~~~ae~s~-~a~}s ; -~e~ases-e~-r~e- g}eels-fie-make-sr~ei~-~ae~k-eer~~e~~t-~e-~l~~s-e~ap~e~; -as-d}~ee~ed-gyp ~l~e- ys~}d~~~- a€~~e~a~- ~s- a- ~a~~~~er~- e~de~;- ~l~e- eet~r~~p- a~~e~r~ep sl~a~~-r~e~~~p-~~ie-sa~e~p-erg-~l~e-l~er~d; -~n-va~~~~n~ ; -grid-~~-~~e-sa~e- ~ -~a~~s-fie-make-s~e~-ee~~ee~}erg-~a~~~~a-e~~l~~-{8}-daps-a~~e~-st~eY~ p ne~~ee- ~s- may}ed- fie- ~l~e- }ash- kr~evar~- address- ef- ~l~e- ss~e~p; - ~l~e ameas~- e~- ~l~e- l~er~e7- sl~a}}- lie- ~e~~e~~ed- fie- ~l~e- yea~d- e~- sc~pe~~~- s6~s: -- - - - - - - - - {e}- - ~~e- ~er~d- ~e~s~~ed- gyp- ~l~~s- see~~er~- sl~a}}- fie- ap- p~e~ed-bp- ~l~e-eer~r~~p-adm~r~~s~~a~e~- asel-elepes~~ed-w~~l~- ~l~e-eesa~p e~e~k-and-sY~a~~-He-~er~ewed-ar~r~~a}}p-erg-e~-~e€e~e-3c~}p-3~- See--~-3~---8}sm~~r~~-eer~~~ae~e~s'--l~er~d- ----------{a}--Be~e~e-aep-pe~see-sl~a~~-esga~e-~~-~l~e-~r~s~eess-e€ a- p}sm~~r~~- eet~~~ae~e~- ~~- ~l~e- eec~~~p; - die- s~ia}}- depes~~- va~~l~- ~l~e eess~p-a}e~k-a-geed-acid-sti~~}e}er~~-l~e~d; -~~-~l~e-sem-e~-~er~-~l~es- sar~d-d6}}ads- {$}8 ; A8A} ; - app~e~red- gyp- ~l~e-eet~r~~p-aelm~r~~s~~a~e~- ar~d eer~d}~~er~ed-~pa~-st~el~-pe~ser~-~a}~~-~a~~~~a}}p-el~se~~e-a~~-~l~e-~a~as pe~~a~~~r~g- fie- ~}~m1~~~g;- d~a~~- }a~~~g;- ~}as~~t~g- arid- e~ea~a€~eg; ~pa~-~~e-bear=d-e€-ss~e~~}ser=s-s~ia~~-~e-}r3demri~€~ed-ar3d-sawed-~a~m- }ess- €r:em- a~~- a}aims- ar=~s~r3g- €~em- aee~der3~s- arid- damage- a€- ar3~ e~iar=ae~e~- ~a~ia~see~*er=- ear~sed- ~~- ~~ie- ~ieg~~geriee- a€- ssel~- der=se~i- e~ ~~- amp- e~~ier?- r~r3€a~~l~€t~}- e~- ~riadegr~a~e- ~ae~l~- derie- bp- ~~m- er=- }~~s ageri~s-er=-ems}epees; -arid-~~ia~-sse~i-pe~seri-~a~}}-ma~ri~a~ri-~e-a-sa€e eead~~~e~i; -€er=-a-~er?~ad-a€-erie-pear=; -a~~-d~~eYies-arid-e~ea~a~~eris wl~~e~i-map-~e-e~er3ed-}~-arid-s~~ee~-~~-€~e-peg€er=mariee-a€-aig~-~~sm~- ~~g- vaer=l~- arid- €~~~l~er?- ~~ia~- a~~- d~r=~- arid- e~l~er?- maker=~a}- e~ea~aa~ed ~~~}- be- eep}creed- Sri- a- geed- eerid~~~eri- ~a~~Yi- s~m~~ar?- maker=}ads Wl~er?e-sae~i-e~eai~a€~er3-~s-made-~~-ari-a~l~a~eel-s€r?ee~-er=-arip-s€~ee~ ~a~ed-~a~~l~-el~er=~-er?-maeadam;-~~e-~aer?d- ~'s~r=ee~;--as-~ie~el•r3-ased; sYia~~-ap~~~-~e-s~devaa~ks; -e~r:l~s; -gs~~er=s; -arid-s€r=ee€-~a~}~~ ----------{~}--ape-~erid-~eeler~r=ed-b~-~l~~s-see~~eri-s~ia~~-~e-mal•r3- ~a~ried-~~-€a}~-€s~ee-creel-a€€ee~-a~-a~~-~~mes- See : -~-33 : --~}ee~r=~ea~-eerier=ae~er=s'--~erid- ----------{a}--~s-ased-l:ri-~l~~s-see~~eri; -€Yie-~e~m-'' a}ee~r=~ea~-eer3- ~r?ae~e~'' -s~ia~~-mean-ar3~-der=sera-vale-~s-er3gaged-~r3-~Yie-~r~s~riess-e€ ; er=-~al~e- ee~eeser3~s- ~~mse~€- fie- ~~ie- psi}~e- as- l~e~rig- engaged- ~e- ~l~e ~ss~r3ees-e€ ; -}ris~a}}peg ; -e~ee~~-~g-e~-~e~a~~}e~-e~ee~~~ea~-~a}~~ag ; €~~~a~es - - a~p~~ariee9 , - appar=a~as- s~- de~~ees- w~i~e~i- ar?e- fie- ~e-ased €er=- ~l~e- ~r=ar3sm~ss~er3- a€- a}ee~r=~e- et~r=r:eri~- €er=- }~g~i~ ; - l~ea~ ; - pevae~ er=-e~l~er:-a}ee~~~ea}-~t~r=penes-w~~l~~ri-~Yie-eer~ri~~; -er=-w~ie-eer~~r:ae~s w~~l~-e~l~er=s-~e-de-se~e~i-wer=i~- ----------{~}--~~er=~-e~ee~~~ea~-eerier=ae~e~-s~ia}}-g}tee-a-geed-algd sty€€l:e~eri~- arir3t~a}- ~er3d- ~~- ~l~e- stem- a€- Seri- ~l~er~sar3d- de}~ar?s {$}e;eee~;-~}€~-a~p~e~ed-ee~~e~a€e-sr~~e€p;-sr~el~-bead-fie-Tema}~-}r~ €~}}- €e~ee- aid- a€€ee€- ~~€}}- Beeeml~e~- 3}- €e}}ew}erg- ~l~e- peas- }a ~a~}e~i-}~-}s-~a~}€€e~: --5ae~i-~er~d-sl~a}}-~e-se-eesd}€}eyed-€l~a€-a}} e}ee€~}ea}- we~~- ~~e€e~med- ~~- e~- e~ele~- €l~e- sc~pe~~}s}ea- s€- sr~e~ ee~€~ae€e~-spa}}-~e-}~-aeee~da~ee-6a}€~-~~eb'}s}ems-s€-€~}s-el~a~~e~ aid-~e-}~dem~}€p-~~e-beard-a€-st~~e~~}sees-e~-€l~e-e~a~e~-a€-~~e~e~- €p-aga}r~s€-damage-~~-~easer~-e€-amp-de€ee€-}~-w}~}~~-e~-€l~e-e~e~- }r~g-a€-s€~ee€s : --Sr~eb-bead-sba}}-be-€s~€l~e~-ee~d}~}erred-€e-~e€r~c~d €e- ~~ie- beard- a€- s~pe~~}sees- e~- €be- g~e~e~~p- ewr~e~- ar~p- mer~ep- ex- pe~ded-€e-ee~~ee€-ar~p-we~}~-e~-~epa}~-ar~p-damage-der~e-e~-ear~sed-~~ €lie-ee~€r:ae€e~-}~-€lie-epees€}ems-a€-b}s-~aa~}~-aid-€e-same-l~a~m}ess amp-~e~se~-€e~-wl~em-€be-ear~~~ae€e~-e~-b}s-ems}epees-map-de-e}ee- €~}ea}- week- er•- €~~r~}sly- ma€e~}a}s- arid- €ha~- lie- ~a}}}- dap- a}}- €ees arid- a}}- €}ryes- asd-pea}~}es-g~epe~}p- }mpesed-a~er~-l3}m- €e~-~}e}a- €}e~-e€-amp-~~eb'}s}erg-a€-X13}s-elgap~e~- ----------{e}--~€-a-beaded-a}ee€~}ea}-eery€~ae€e~-€a}}s;-~e€sses e~-r~eg}eels-€e-ma}~e-~}s-~ae~l~-ear€e~m-~e-~~}s-el~a~€e~ ; -as-d}gee€ee7 bp-€lge-bs}}d}eg-a€€}e}a}-}~-a-w~}€€er~-e~de~; -€l3e-ee~r~bp-a€be~aep alga}}-ne€}€p-€l~e-sr~~e€p-e~-€iqe-bead ; -}~-w~}€}erg ; -aid-}€-bige-sa~e- €p-€a}}s-€e-make-sselq-ee~~ee€}erg-w}€l3}~-a}gbh--F$}-daps-a€€e~-st~el~ web}ee- }s- ma}}eel- €e- ~13e- }ash- kr~ewr~- address- a€- €13e- ss~e€p; - €13e amet~r~€- a€- €iqe- bead- sl~a}}- be- €e~€e}€ed- €e- ~lqe- bead- a€- st~pe~~}- s6~s- -- - - - - - - - - {d}- - ~lge- bead- ~eqe~}red- bp- €l~}s-see€}erg- alga}}- be- afl- ~~e~ed-bp-Abe-eee~r~€p-adm}r~}s€~abe~-acid-deees}€ed-w}€Ig-€l3e-eesr~€p e}e~le-ar~el-~e~ewed-a~~aa}}p-erg-e~-~e€e~e-Beeeml~e~-3}- 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect on January 12, 1988. On motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by Supervisor Johnson, and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None A COPY - TESTE: ~G~~, ~/. Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors 1/13/88 cc: File Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney James T. Nininger, Chief Building Official Timothy Gubala, Assistant County Administrator Francis Burkart, Commonwealth's Attorney Roanoke Law Library, 315 Church Avenue, Roanoke 24016 Main Library Code Book -~ ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE.ROANOKE IN ROANOKE, VA., O OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER N TUESDAY, MEETING DATE: January 12, 1988 SUBJECT: ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION OF CERTAIN REAL ESTATE LOCATED WITHIN THE CITY OF ROANOKE ADJACENT TO THE ROANOKE REGIONAL AIRPORT, AND THE CONVEYANCE OF SAID REAL ESTATE IN EXCHANGE FOR CERTAIN REAL ESTATE FOR AN ACCESS ROAD, AND THE APPROVAL OF A CERTAIN AGREE- MENT WITH THE ROANOKE REGIONAL AIRPORT COMMISSION COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S CJ OMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: On December 1, 1987, the Board of Supervisors approved a request for industrial access road funding for the Valleypointe, Phase I project, and authorized the execution of the project docu- ment between Lingerfelt Development Corporation and Roanoke County. On October 27, 1987, the Board approved the rezoning of the Harris-Moomaw properties. This ordinance complies with the provisions of the County Charter which require that any acquisition or conveyance of real estate by the County be accomplished by ordinance. The first reading of this proposed ordinance was held on December 15, 1987; the second reading is scheduled for January 12, 1988. The ordinance has been amended from the version submitted to the Board on December 15, 1987. Paragraph 3 was changed to include the following sentence: "Any remaining property shall be utilized for economic development or other public purposes. This ordinance authorizes the following actions: 1) The acquisition of approximately eight (8) acres of real estate located in Roanoke City from the Ida Mae Holland estate; 2) The acquisition of approximately eight (8) acres of real estate located in Roanoke County from the Roanoke Regional Air- port Commission; 3) The exchange of the Holland estate property for the Air- port Commission property; 1 1~ _ ._.1-- 4) The disposition of these properties for valid public purposes, namely the purposes of the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission and for public road purposes; 5) The ratification and confirmation of the agreement be- tween Roanoke County and the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission; and 6) The appropriation of funds to accomplish these purposes. FISCAL IMPACT: $260,000 needs to be appropriated from Fund Balance. This is a portion of the $2,000,000 proposal which was presented to the Board on December 1, 1987. ($255,000 purchase price plus $5,000 for miscellaneous legal, survey, title insurance costs.) RECOMMENDATION: Staff makes the following recommendations: 1. That the Board of Supervisors adopt the proposed ordinance. 2. That the Board of Supervisors reaffirm that these par- cels of real estate are surplus and are available for disposition by the County, and shall be made available for other public uses; namely, for the purposes of the Roanoke Regional Airport Commis- sion and for public road purposes. Respectfully submitted, Brent Sheffler Economic Development Specialist ------------=------------ ACTION --------- VOTE N~ Yes Abs Approved Denied Received Referred To 'V ~ . Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney ( ) Motion by: ( ) ( ) Garrett Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers 2 ~~.."" AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRCENTER,HONDTUESDAY,ROJANOUARYCO~NT1988MINISTRATION ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION OF CERTAIN REAL ESTATE LOCATED WITHIN THE CITY OF ROANOKE ADJACENT TO THE ROANOKE REGIONAL AIRPORT, AND THE CON- VEYANCE OF SAID REAL ESTATE IN EXCHANGE FOR CERTAIN REAL ESTATE FOR AN ACCESS ROAD, AND THE APPROVAL OF A CERTAIN AGREEMENT WITH THE ROANOKE REGIONAL AIRPORT COMMISSION WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors finds that the acquisition of certain real estate adjacent to Thirlane Road and the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission property in Roanoke City from the Ida Mae Holland estate serves an important public purpose by promoting and benefiting the regional public purposes of the Airport Commission; and WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors finds that the acquisition of certain real estate in the vicinity of the southeast intersection of Interstate Routes 81 and 581 in Roanoke County, Virginia, from the Roanoke Regional Airport Com- mission serves an important public purpose by promoting indus- trial and economic development and by inducing manufacturing, industrial, governmental, or commercial enterprises to locate or remain in Roanoke County and the Roanoke Valley; and WHEREAS, said acquisition of this real estate shall be used for industrial access or other road improvements to facili- tate the industrial and economic development of previously unde- veloped lands within the County; and 1 ~I WHEREAS, the acquisition of this property will improve the safety of the intersections of State Route 117 (Peters Creek Road), Thirlane Road, and the interchange of Interstate 581; and WHEREAS, this transaction will be in harmony with and further the fulfillment of the duly-adopted comprehensive plan of the County; will produce increased revenue from property, sales, license, and other taxes or fees to the County; will produce ex- panded employment opportunities for the citizens of the County and surrounding jurisdictions; and WHEREAS, this transaction will aid and promote the goals and purposes of the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission by conveying to the Commission certain real estate located within the City of Roanoke adjacent to existing facilities and property. WHEREAS, these properties are deemed "surplus" for the purposes of Section 16.01 of the Roanoke County Charter, and are being made available for other public uses. NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the Board of Supervi- sors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the f first reading on this ordinance was held on December 15, 1987, and the second reading was held on January 12, 1988. 2. That the acquisition of certain real estate not to exceed eight (8) acres located within the City of Roanoke known as the Ida Mae Holland tract is hereby authorized and approved. 3. That the acquisition of certain real estate not to exceed eight (8) acres from the Roanoke Regional Airport Commis- sion is hereby authorized and approved. This real estate shall 2 r ..~... be utilized for industrial access or other road improvement pur- poses. A subsequent conveyance of this property or any portion thereof to the Virginia Department of Transportation for public road purposes and uses is hereby authorized and approved. Any remaining property shall be utilized for economic development or other public purposes. 4. That the conveyance of the real estate identified in paragraph 2, above, to the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission in exchange for the real estate identified in paragraph 3, above, is hereby authorized and approved. Further, the disposition and conveyance of the property described in paragraph 2, above, is for other public uses and purposes, namely, the uses and purposes of the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission. 5. That the agreement between the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission and Roanoke County set forth in the actions and documents of the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission at its September 25, 1987, meeting is hereby ratified, confirmed, and approved. 6. That the sum of $260,000 is hereby appropriated from the Fund Balance to accomplish the purposes of this ordin- ance. 7. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized to take such actions and to execute such documents as may be ne- cessary to accomplish these purposes, all upon form approved by the County Attorney. 3 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRCENTER HONDTUESDAY,ROANOARYCO~NT1988MINISTRATION ORDINANCE 11288-7 AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION OF CERTAIN REAL ESTATE LOCATED WITHIN THE CITY OF ROANOKE ADJACENT TO THE ROANOKE REGIONAL AIRPORT, AND THE CONVEYANCE OF SAID REAL ESTATE IN EXCHANGE FOR CERTAIN REAL ESTATE FOR AN ACCESS ROAD, AND THE APPROVAL OF A CERTAIN AGREEMENT WITH THE ROANOKE REGIONAL AIRPORT COMMISSION WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors finds that the acquisition of certain real estate adjacent to Thirlane Road and the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission property in Roanoke City from the Ida Mae Holland estate serves an important public purpose by promoting and benefiting the regional public purposes of the Airport Commission; and WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors finds that the acquisition of certain real estate in the vicinity of the southeast intersection of Interstate Routes 81 and 581 in Roanoke County, Virginia, from the Roanoke Regional Airport Com- mission serves an important public purpose by promoting indus- trial and economic development and by inducing manufacturing, industrial, governmental, or commercial enterprises to locate or remain in Roanoke County and the Roanoke Valley; and WHEREAS, said acquisition of this real estate shall be used for industrial access or other road improvements to facili- tate the industrial and economic development of previously unde- veloped lands within the County; and WHEREAS, the acquisition of this property will improve the safety of the intersections of State Route 117 (Peters Creek Road), Thirlane Road, and the interchange of Interstate 581; and WHEREAS, this transaction will be in harmony with and further the fulfillment of the duly-adopted comprehensive plan of the County; will produce increased revenue from property, sales, license, and other taxes or fees to the County; will produce ex- panded employment opportunities for the citizens of the County and surrounding jurisdictions; and WHEREAS, this transaction will aid and promote the goals and purposes of the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission by conveying to the Commission certain real estate located within the City of Roanoke adjacent to existing facilities and property. WHEREAS, these properties are deemed "surplus" for the purposes of Section 16.01 of the Roanoke County Charter, and are being made available for other public uses. NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the Board of Supervi- sors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the first reading on this ordinance was held on December 15, 1987, and the second reading was held on January 12, 1988. 2. That the acquisition of certain real estate not to exceed eight (8) acres located within the City of Roanoke known as the Ida Mae Holland tract is hereby authorized and approved. 3. That the acquisition of certain real estate not to exceed eight (8) acres from the Roanoke Regional Airport Commis- sion is hereby authorized and approved. This real estate shall be utilized for industrial access or other road improvement pur- poses. A subsequent conveyance of this property or any portion thereof to the Virginia Department of Transportation for public road purposes and uses is hereby authorized and approved. Any remaining property shall be utilized for economic development or other public purposes. 4. That the conveyance of the real estate identified in paragraph 2, above, to the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission in exchange for the real estate identified in paragraph 3, above, is hereby authorized and approved. Further, the disposition and conveyance of the property described in paragraph 2, above, is for other public uses and purposes, namely, the uses and purposes of the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission. 5. That the agreement between the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission and Roanoke County set forth in the actions and documents of the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission at its September 25, 1987, meeting is hereby ratified, confirmed, and approved. 6. That the sum of $260,000 is hereby appropriated from the Fund Balance to accomplish the purposes of this ordin- ance. 7. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized to take such actions and to execute such documents as may be ne- cessary to accomplish these purposes, all upon form approved by the County Attorney. On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor Nickens, and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None A COPY - TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors 1/13/88 cc: File Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney John Willey, Real Estate Assessments Timothy Gubala, Assistant County Administrator ITEM NUMBER ~l- AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: January 12, 1988 SUBJECT: Appointments to Committees, Commissions and Boards COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: 1 Court Service Unit Advisory Council/Youth and Family Services Advisory Board• One year terms of youth member Emily Reaser, Northside High School. Her term expired November 13, 1987. 2. Grievance Panel: Unexpired two-year term of Richard Robers. Mr. Robers has resigned due to his election to the Board of Supervisors. His term expires September 27, 1989. 3 Health Department Board_of Directors: Two-year term of Parker Foley. Mr. Foley's term expires November 26, 1987. 4. Library Board: Four-year terms of Paula Winstead, Catawba Magisterial District. Her term expires December 31, 1987. SUBMITTED BY: Mary H. Allen Deputy Clerk APPROVED BY: ~JP Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator -------------- ------ ------------------------ACTION VOTE No Yes P. Approved ( ) Motion by: Denied ( ) Garrett Johnson Received ( ) McGraw Referred Nickens To Robers -'-! COURT SERVICES UNIT ADVISORY COUNCIL/YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES ADVISORY BOARD A. COMPOSITION Board to consist of two members from etch magisterial district, and one youth member from each high school. Governing bodies of each county and city served by a court service unit may appoint one or more members to a citizen advisory council. B, DUTIES: Advises and cooperates with the court upon all matters affecting the working of this law and other laws relating to children, their care and protection and to domestic relations; Consults and confer with the court and director of the court service unit relative to the development and extension of the court service program; Encourage the members selected by the council to serve on the central advisory council to visit as often as the member conveniently can, institutions and associations receiving children under this the chaldrenereceivedtby oruin chargenoftanys and surroundings of such persons, institutions or associations. The Council should make themselves familiar with the work of the court. Makes an annual report to the court and the participating governing bodies on the work of the council. A_s the Youth and Family Services Advisory Board: Establish goals and priorities for County-wide youth services; assist in coordination and planning for comprehensive youth services within the private sector. Serve in an advisory capacity and to otherwise assist the Board of Supervisors to establish goals and objectives in compliance with all "minimum Standards of the Delinquency Prevention and Youth Development Act of 1979". Assist in conducting an assessment of the needs of youth every five years and to assist in developing an annual Delinquency Prevention Plan, further to participate in evaluating the implementation of the plan and making a report thereon to the Board of Supervisors. Provide a public forum where concerns about youth may be expressed and to receive recommendations and raise concerns of public and private organizations at any regular advisory board meeting upon proper notice. Advocates necessary legislative amendments to improve community conditions for youth development and to support the development of needed services both public and private for youth in the community. C. MEETING SCHEDULE: One a quarter, the third Tuesday, beginning January; time and place determined at meetings. GRIEVANCE PANEL A. COMPOSITION To consist of three (3) members, appointed by the Board of Supervisors; for terms of two years. B. DUTIES The panel shall adopt such rules and procedures as it deems necessary and desirable. The panel has the responsibility to rule on the interpretation, application, and meaning of the County's personnel policies, rules and regulations. The panel shall select for each hearing a panel chairman, set a time for the hearing which shall be held as soon as practical, but no later than fifteen (15) full working days after the grievant appeal. i C, MEETING SCHEDULE The County Administrator shall arrange a hearing with the panel members to hear the grievance. 4030 Chaparral Drive Roanoke Virginia 24018 December 7, 1987 Mr. Bob L. Johnson, Chairman Roanoke County Board of Supervisors p, O. Box 29800 Roanoke, Virginia 24018 ~-z Dear Bob: Effective December 31, 1987, please accept my resignation from the Roanoke County Grievance Panel. As you know, I will begin my term as a member of the Board of Supervisors representating the Cave Spring Magisterial District on January 1, 1988, and I do not feel that it would be appropriate to continue as a member of the Grievance Panel. I will appoint someone to fill my unexpired term in January. I look forward to working with you, the other board members and the County staff. Sincerely, ~ l - r' Richard W. Robers RWR/mha CC: D. Keith Cook, Director of Human Resources ~- HEALTH DEPARTMENT BOARD OF DIRECTORS Established by the Nancy M. Welch, Director, Alleghany Health District on October 31, 1985. Roanoke County will appoint one individual for a two year term. Meetings will be held four times per year. TERM TERM EXPIRES . _. . . ~. Parker Foley 2 years 11/26/87 3767 Kentland Dr. Roanoke, Virginia 24018 Home: 989-1194 Work: 989-9500 LIBRARY BOARD A. COMPOSITION (Code of Virginia 42.1-35) To consist of not less than five (5) members, appointed by the Board of Supervisors; representing each Magisterial District, members may serve 4 year terms, only two terms consecutively. B. DUTIES: For management and control of a free public library system. Has control of the expenditure of all moneys credited to the regional free library fund. Has the right to accept donations and bequests of money, personal property or real estate for the establishment and maintenance of such regional free library system or endowments for same. Has authority to execute contracts for the purpose of administering a public library service with the region. C. MEETING SCHEDULE: Fourth Wednesday of each month, 5:30 p.m., Headquarters Library Route 419. r. L.. ~ -- AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JANUARY 12, 1988 RESOLUTION NO. APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM L - CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That that certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for January 12, 1988, designated as Item L - Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through , inclusive, as follows: 1. Minutes of Meeting - October 27, 1987, November 17, 1987. 2. Confirmation of Committee Appointment to the Library Board. 3. Request for acceptance of the following roads into the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System: a. Snowgoose Circle b. Millwheel Drive, Mill Pond Drive, and Stone Mill Drive. 4. Approval of Resolution of Support for request by the Virginia Department for the Aging for 13.2 million funding . 5. Request for approval of a Bingo Permit for the Loyal Order of Moose Lodge No. 284. 2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said r L /-~ items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this resolution. motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor On Garrett, and upon the following recorded vote: erviaors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett AYES: Sup NAYS: None A COPY - TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerkervisors Roanoke County Board of Sup 1/13/88 cc: File Director of Engineer~ny Phillip Henry,. Bingo File Library Board File Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Roanoke County Administration Center 3738 Brambleton Avenue, SW Roanoke, Virginia 24018 October 27, 1987 The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, met this day at the Roanoke County Administration Center, this being the second Tuesday, and the second regularly scheduled meeting of the month of October, 1987. IN RE: CALL TO ORDER Chairman Johnson called the meeting to order at 3:03 p.m. The roll call was taken. MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Bob L. Johnson, Vice Chairman Lee Garrett, Supervisors Alan H. Brittle, Steven A. McGraw MEMBERS ABSENT: Supervisor Harry C. Nickens STAFF PRESENT: Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator; John M. Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator for Management Services; John R. Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator of Public Facilities; Timothy W. Gubala, Assistant County Administrator for Community Development; Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney, Mary H. Allen, Deputy 23'7 ~ :- ~ . October 27, 1987 Clerk; Brent Sheffler, Economic Development Specialist; Phillip Henry, Director of Engineering; Reta Busher, Director of Budget and Management; Diane Hyatt, Director of Finance; Steven Carpenter, Director of Parks & Recreation; Clifford Craig, Director of Utilities SIN RE: OPENING CEREMONIES The invocation was given by The Reverend Gordon Grimes, Cave Spring Baptist Church. The Pledge of Allegiance was recited by all present. IN RE: REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF THE AGENDA ITEMS Chairman Johnson announced that Item 1, Park Bond appropriation transfer for funding of Starkey Park athletic fields would be delayed until Supervisor Nickens arrived. He also announced that Item 2, Approval of the funding for sewer i extension to serve Perimeter East and West Ruritan Road, and Item 3, Approval of funding for sewer extension from Glade Creek Interceptor to Route 460 had been postponed until the November 17th meeting. IN RE: PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS AND AWARDS Coy Daughtery from the Chapter of Ex-Prisoners of War and Gene Tayloe from the Amvets presented five United States flags that had been donated from various Veterans Associations. These flags will be hung at public buildings that do not now have flags. Supervisor McGraw and Supervisor Garrett both expressed deep appreciation for the donated flags. IN RE: NEW BUSINESS 1. Approval for transfer of park bond funds for Starkey Park athletic fields: This item was delayed at Supervisor Nickens request. 2. Approval of Funding for sewer extension to serve Perimeter East and West Ruritan Road: This item was postponed until November 13, 1987. 3. Approval of funding for sewer extension from Glade Creek Interceptor to Route 460: This item was postponed until November 13, 1987. 4. Request from Valley Metro to extend service from the Roanoke City limits along Brambleton Avenue to the state office of Vocational Rehabilitation: Assistant County Administrator John Chambliss advised that Supervisor Nickens has 2.3 9 . ~~: -.r October 27, 1987 met with Valley Metro and RADAR, and discussed this with the Department of Rehabilitative Services and would like to begin this service November 1st. This request will allow the service to be extended to the Office of Rehabilitative Services and proceed toward a satisfactory resolution for the request to extend the service on the Cave Spring Corners or the area along Postal Drive. Supervisor Brittle stated that the Brambleton Avenue merchants strongly desire the full extension of service to Cave Spring Corners. He moved that the full extension to the Valley Orthopedic Center be approved. Supervisor Garrett asked what the subsidy would be to extend the service that far. Mr. Chambliss responded that the last figure given by Valley Metro is a subsidy of $400 per month to run through June 1988. Mr. Hodge requested some flexibility in the motion, giving approval to the Office of Rehabilitative Services with the flexibility to allow staff to work with Valley Metro to extend the route if possible. Supervisor Brittle amended the motion to reflect Mr. Hodge's request and asked Mr. Chambliss to inform the Brambleton Avenue Association of the motion. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Garrett and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Johnson NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens 24.0 October 27, 1987 IN RE: REQUEST FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Request for public hearing on November 17, 1987 at 7:00 p.m. for condemnation and right-of-entry for Starkey Force Main and Gravity Sewer: Supervisor Johnson moved to set the public hearing. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Garrett and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Johnson NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens IN RE: APPOINTMENTS: 1. Community Corrections Resources Board• Supervisor Nickens previously nominated Edmund J. Kielty for a one-year term, expiring August 13, 1988. He will be confirmed on the Consent Agenda. 2. Court Service Unit Advisory Council/Youth and Family Services Advisory Board• Supervisor Nickens had previously requested the nomination of James L. Trout to the unexpired term of Joseph D. Cronin. His term will expire on March 22, 1989. Supervisor Nickens also nominated Cassidee R. :~. 2 4 ~~ October 27, 1987 Nickens to serve as a youth member from William Byrd High School to a one-year term expiring November 13, 1988. These nominations will be confirmed under the Consent Agenda. Supervisor McGraw nominated Molly Eller to a one-year term as youth member from Glenvar High School. 3. Grievance Panel: Supervisor Nickens had previously nominated R. Vincent Reynolds to a three-year term as alternate. His appointment will be confirmed under the Consent Agenda . 4. Mental Health Services of Roanoke Valley Board of Directors: The Mental Health Association has recommended and Chairman Johnson concurs that Dr. Henry J. Sullivan be nominated. IN RE: REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS: Supervisor Brittle announced that Elizabeth Stokes has an opportunity to travel to China as part of a people to people exchange at a cost of $4,770 in March 1988. Mrs. Stokes has advised that she could fund half this cost from her budget. Supervisor Brittle moved that the County Administrator be authorized to find funding for the other half of the trip. The motion was seconded by Supervisor McGraw. The motion carried by a unanimous voice vote. Mr. Hodge pointed out that it may be 242 October 27, 1987 necessary to find funding for other staff to travel to China also as part of the economic development effort. Supervisor Brittle directed Mr. Hodge to inform Mrs. Stokes that the funding had been approved. Supervisor Johnson advised that after attending several drainage meetings, he feels that it is obvious that drainage problems impact several localities. He moved to direct the County Administrator to study the possibility of asking the General Assembly to support a Drainage District Commission which would include the area localities, similar to Airport Commission and Landfill Board, and report back to the Board by the end of the year. The motion was seconded by Supervisor McGraw and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisor Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Johnson NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens IN RE: CONSENT AGENDA Supervisor Garrett moved to approve the Consent Agenda. The motion was seconded by Supervisor. RESOLUTION N0. 102787-3 APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA 2 ~ 3. October 27, 1987 FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM J - CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That that certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for October 27, 1987, designated as Item J - Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 6, inclusive, as follows: 1. Request for approval for a Raffle Permit from the Fort Lewis Civic League. 2. Acceptance of water and sewer facilities serving Castle Rock Farms, Section 6. 3. Acceptance of water facilities serving Cherokee Hills Section 3. 4. License for Pipe Line Facility between Norfolk Southern and Roanoke County for drainage pipe at Public Service Center. 5. Approval to change Sanitary Sewer Easement Branderwood Section #3. 6. Confirmation of Committee Appointments to the Community Corrections Resources Board, the Court Service Unit Advisory Council/Youth and Family Services Advisory Board, and the Grievance Panel. 2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this resolution. 244 October 27, 1987 On motion of Supervisor Garrett, seconded by Supervisor McGraw, and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Johnson NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens IN RE: CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS Supervisor Brittle reported that he has heard recently from many citizens that Roanoke County is doing a fine job in recreation, public facilities, streets. He expressed appreciation to the staff for their excellent response to the county citizens. SIN RE: REPORTS The following reports were received and filed: 1. Accounts paid for the month of September 1987. ~IN RE: COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS County Administrator Elmer Hodge announced that Ingersoll-Rand will be meeting with a delegation from Xuanhua, China. Xuanhua has indicated an interest in a "Sister Community" 2 4 5 October 27, 1987 relationship with Roanoke County. Mr. Hodge announced there will be a press conference concerning this on Friday, October 30th at 9 a .m. IN RE: NEW BUSINESS: (Continued) 1. Approval of transfer of park bond funds for Starkey Park athletic fields: (this was delayed from earlier in the session): Stephen Carpenter, Director of Parks & Recreation reported that the Board had previously approved the development of Starkey Park, with the bond monies to be used only for park land acquisition. It was deemed necessary to provide additional facilities after the lights at the Hidden Valley ball fields were removed. The board approved one soccer field, one baseball field and associated parking at Starkey Park, but funds were not allocated. It is now necessary to allocate $67,010 to fund these facilities. Staff recommends that the funds be allocated from either balances in other park bond funds available or the general fund. Supervisor Johnson moved that $67,010 for Starkey Park development be appropriated from the fund balance. The motion was seconded by Supervisor McGraw and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Johnson October 27, 1987 NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens 246 Chairman Johnson announced that a quorum of board members will be in attendance at the annual Virginia Association of Counties meeting at the Homestead, and directed the Deputy Clerk to advise the other media. IN RE: RECESS At 3:45 p.m. Chairman Johnson declared a dinner recess. IN RE: RECONVENEMENT At 7:00 p.m. Chairman Johnson called the meeting back to order. Supervisor Nickens was present for the evening session. IN RE: FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 1. First Rea din and ublic hearin on ordinance vacatin the remainin Plat of Section One Thorncrest Subdivision: County Attorney Paul Mahoney reported this was a 2 ,4 '?' October 27, 1987 petition to vacate a portion of a plat of Thorcrest Subdivision. This vacation `is -necessary to go forwa-rd with the proposed Valleypointe project. There is an old subdivision plat on record that would have to be vacated. Michael Smeltzer, attorney for the petitioner was present to answer questions. No citizens were present to speak. Supervisor Johnson moved to approve the first reading. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Garrett, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson NAYS : None 2. Ordinance accepting an offer for and authorizing the lease of sur lus real estate Old Bent Mountain Fire Station: Mr. Mahoney advised that the County Administrator has received an offer to lease the .Old. Bent Mountain Fire Station. This property has been declared surplus by the Board. The second reading will be November 17, 1987. No citizens were present to speak on this ordinance. Supervisor Garrett moved to approve the first reading of the ordinance. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Nickens, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None 248 October 27, 1987 3. Ordinance accepting an offer for and authorizing the sale of surplus real estate - well lot in Otterview Garden Subdivision: Mr. Mahoney stated that the County had received an offer from a citizen to purchase an abandoned well lot locatE on La ban Road. The second reading will be November 17, 1987. r citizens were present to speak to this ordinance. Supervisor Nickens moved to approve first reading of the ordinance. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Johnson, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None IN RE: SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance amending Ordinance No 6987-9 authorizing the County Administra to accept the donation or dedication of~ utility and right-of-way road easements and improvements therein: Mr. Mahoney reported that the first reading of this ordinance was on October 13, 1987. The county charter requires that the acquisition of real estate be accomplished by ordinance This ordinance would authorize an expedited procedure for noncontroversial water, sewer, and drainage easements. No citizens were present to speak to this ordinance. :~ 249 October 27, 1987 Supervisor Johnson moved to approve the ordinance. The tion was seconded by Supervisor Garrett, and carried by the ollowing recorded vote: YES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson AYS: None ORDINANCE 102787-4 AMENDING ORDINANCE N0. 6-9-87-9 AUTHORIZING THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR TO ACCEPT THE DONATION OR DEDICATION OF UTILITY AND RIGHT-OF-WAY ROAD EASEMENTS AND IMPROVEMENTS THEREIN WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Charter of Roanoke County, first and second readings are equired to pass all ordinances; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors adopted an ordinance June 9, 1987, authorizing the County Administrator to accept lonations of dedications of utility and right-of-way road ease- ~ents and improvements therein upon concurrence of said Board of upervisors; and WHEREAS, upon passage of said ordinance, a more orderly nd expeditious procedure of reviewing, approving, authorizing, nd accepting donations or dedications of such interest in real state has been accomplished; and WHEREAS, a more orderly and expeditious procedure of reviewing, approving, authorizing, and accepting the donation or 250 October 27, 1987 dedication of water, sewer, or drainage easements and other real estate interests. is desired; and WHEREAS, a first reading of the proposed amended ordin- ance was held on October 13, 1987; the second reading was held on October 27, 1987. THEREFORE, be ordained by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County that Ordinance No. 6-9-87-9 be amended as follows: 1. That upon the proposed donation or dedication of a utility, water, sewer, or drainage easement or other property interest, or a right-of-way for road purposes and any improve- ments or facilities constructed therein, and/or the donation or dedication of any property interest upon which to construct or maintain any improvements or facilities in connection therewith, the County Administrator is hereby authorized to accept said dona- tion or dedication, upon the review and recommendation of the County Engineer, or his designee, and upon the concurrence of the Board of Supervisors by resolution. 2. That the County Administrator is authorized to exe- cute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County as are necessary to accomplish the acquisition of these property interests, all of which shall be upon form approved by the County Attorney. The County Administrator may delegate this authority as he deems appropriate. ;~ ~ 1 .. :,~~ .s::. October 27, 1987 3. The effective date of this amendment shall be ~~October 27, 1987. On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor IlGarrett, and upon the following recorded vote: IIAYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson IINAYS : None IIN RE: PUBLIC HEARINGS '1087-1 PETITION OF J. F. DAVIS AND W. E. CUNDIFF TO REZONE AN APPROXIMATE 19.4 ACRE TRACT FROM M-2 INDUSTRIAL TO RE RESIDENTIAL ESTATES TO CONSTRUCT SINGLE FAMILY HOMES LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF ROUTE 758 IN THE HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT. (CONTINUED FROM SEPTEMBER 22, 1987. T DDDl~[7L~T Assistant County Administrator Timothy Gubala reported !that this petition was heard by the Planning Commission on August 4 and September 1, 1987 and they did approve recommendation on a vote of 4 to 1. There are proffered conditions for the site plan, which are improved over the previously submitted site plan. Heywood Fralin, attorney for the petitioner was present. He advised that the original petition was opposed by the the planning staff and Planning Commission because of the number of lots that fronted on Route 758. ,The present plan provides for 80 lots with 80 foot frontages and all entrances to lots are off roads other than Route 758. The request for rezoning only ~5~ October 27, 1987 affects seven lots, the remaining portion is already zoned Residential Estates. The developer has stated he will develop the property to the south first so that if there is any use for the industrial land he is willing to develop that land commercially. Supervisor Johnson stated he still feels that there are problems with the lots off Carson Road. He also thanked the developer for his cooperation in trying to solve the concerns the County had with the rezoning. Speaking in opposition to this proposed rezoning were: 1. Stuart Wamsley, 3768 Autumn Drive N. E. 2. Clifton P. Sloan, 3837 Carson Road 3. Bobby R. Combs, 3602 Belle Avenue N. E. Their main concerns were the additional traffic being generated by this development on the narrow roads. Supervisor Johnson pointed out that even without the rezoning, 73 homes would be built on the property. With the rezoning the developer has agreed not to develop part of the property until the County has an opportunity to market it for economic development. Supervisor Johnson moved to approve the petition with proffered conditions. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Barrett, and carried by the following recorded vote: .a ? ` .. 253 .. October 27, 1987 AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None FINAL ORDER NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDERED that the aforementioned ''.parcel of land, which is contained in the Roanoke County Tax Maps as Parcel 50.01-1-16 and recorded in Deed Book 712, page 302, and legally described below, be rezoned from Industrial M-2 District to RE Residential District. BEGINNING at a point on the westerly side of N & W Railway right-of-way, said point being corner to property of A. J. & Doris H. Robertson, Tax Map No. 50.01-1-20; thence with Robertson's line, N 69° 30' W. 177.0 feet; N. 34° W. 132.0 feet; N. 700 35'W. 26.75 feet; N. 40 21;E. 127.2 feet; and N. 58° 08' W. 159+ feet to a point; thence new lines, S. 40 30'W. 290 +_ feet to a point; S. 90 15'W. 500+ feet to a point; S. 17° 10'W. 430+ feet to a point; and S. 23° 15'W. 470+ to a point on line of property of McKnight, Tax Map No. 50.03-1-3; thence with same S. 860 18'E. 645+ feet to a point on the westerly side of N & W Railway right-of-way; thence with the same with a curved line to the left, 1280+ feet to the place of BEGINNING, containing approximately 19.4 acres, all as more full shown on Rezoning Plat for J. F. Davis and W. E. Cundiff, prepared by T. P. Parker & Son, Engineers and Surveyors, Ltd., dated June 9, 1987. X54 October 27, 1987 PROFFER OF CONDITIONS The conceptual plans submitted with the amended petition will be substantially followed in the development of the residential lots on the property. 1087-2 PETITION OF LINGERFELT DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION requesting vacation of the map of Section One, Thorncrest in Plat Book 3, page 67, located in the Hollins Magisterial District. This petition was heard under First Reading of Ordinances and will be voted on following the second reading on November 17, 1987. 1087-3 PETITION OF LINGERFELT DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION REQUESTING REZONING FROM A-1 AGRICULTURAL TO M-1 INDUSTRIAL WITH A SPECIAL EXCEPTION PERMIT OF A TRACT CONTAINING APPROXIMATELY 52 ACRES LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST INTERSECTION OF PETERS CREER ROAD AND INTERSTATE 581 IN THE HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT. APPROVED WITH PROFFERED CONDITIONS Mr. Gubala announced that this petition was heard by the Planning Commission on October 6th. There were citizens present at that time. They were not in opposition, but concerned with the future impact on the neighborhood. Since the Planning Commission meeting, there have been several discussions concerning proffered conditions. The petitioner has voluntarily proffered a number of conditions that the Board received prior to 255 .. ~~;. October 27, 1987 tonight's meeting. Mr. Gubala briefly outlined those proffers. The petitioner, Mr. Al Lingerfelt, President and Chief Executive Officer of Lingerfelt Development Corporation, was present and outlined the plans for the proposed rezoning done by Hayes, Seay, Mattern and Mattern. He also showed slides of similar developments he has completed in other areas. Mr. Hodge pointed out that Mr. Lingerfelt and the developer have reached an agreement that will be brought to the Board for approval. This will include the exchange of the Ida IMae Holland property. Supervisor Johnson commended Mr. Lingerfelt for his 'patience during the bureaucractic process of bringing this request to completion. He also advised that this was the single largest potential development in the history of Roanoke County. No citizens spoke in support or opposition to the project. Supervisor Johnson moved to approve the petition with the proffered conditions. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Garrett, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens,~Johnson NAYS : None FINAL ORDER 25 6 October 27, 1987 NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDERED that the aforementioned parcels of land, which are contained in the Roanoke County Tax Maps as Parcels 37.06-1-1 and 37.07-1-8,9,11,12 and 13 and legally described below, be rezoned from A-1, Agricultural District To M-1, Light Industrial District with special exceptior, for office and commercial development. BEGINNING at an existing Va. Dept. of Highways monument on the northerly side of a service road (Recess Lane) leading to Va. Route 117 (Petes4 Creek Road), S 570 04'25"W - 10.08' to a set iron rebar, the actual place of beginning; THENCE, along the north R/W of said service road S 57004'25"W - 51.19' to a set iron rebar, corner to Smith's Transfer Corporation; THENCE leaving said service road and with the line of Smith's Transfer Corp. N 45018'05"W - 1013.50' to_ a ,set__i.ron_. rebar; THENCE continuing along said line, N 460 52'10"W-54.50' to a set iron rebar; THENCE S 590 01'55"W-867.57' to an existing iron rebar, corner to Overnite Transportation Company; THENCE with the line of Overnite Transportation Company S 30058'05"E-597-27' to an existing iron rebar on the northerly side of Recess Lane; THENCE with the northerly side of Recess Road N 80° 12' 20" W-66.01' to an existing iron rebar, corner to Industrial Development Authority of Roanoke County, Virginia T/A Truck Enterprises Roanoke, Inc; THENCE with the line of Truck Enterprises Roanoke, Inc., N 300 50' 05" W - 717.00'to an existing iron rebar; THENCE with the line of Truck Enterprises Roanoke, Inc., S 590 01'55" W-543.69' to an existing iron rebar on 6 , f t S ~c~• 2 ~ 7' . October 27, 1987 the easterly right-of-way line of Interstate 581; THENCE with the easterly side of Interstate 581, the following courses: N 18033'55"W - 231.10' to an existing V.D.H. N 44023'40"W - 347.15' to an existing V.D.H. N 20052'50"W - 145.51' to an existing V.D.H. N 27034'50"W - 98.29' to an existing V.D.H. N 18056'45"W - 193.86' to an existing V.D.H. N 11009'45"W - 194.45' to an existing V.D.H. N 15005'25"W - 194.43' to an existing V.D.H. N 06041'10"W - 242.80' to an existing V.D.H. N 00020'40"W - 162.06' to an existing V.D.H. N 01056'30"E - 124.59' to an existing V.D.H. and corner to Simpson property. THENCE with the line of Simpson N 53°46'20"E - 184.60'to a set iron rebar, THENCE continuing with the line of Simpson N 55055'20"E - 338.87' to an existing iron rebar; THENCE with the line of Simpson and City of Roanoke, 460 57' 40" E. PROFFER OF CONDITIONS monument monument monument monument monument monument monument monument monument monument 1. This property will not include permitted uses for: a. Automobile painting, upholstering, repairing, rebuilding, reconditioning, body and fender work, truck repairing or overhauling; b. Manufacture of pottery and figurines or other similar ceramic products; c. Veterinary hospital and commercial kennels with exterior runs and yards; d. Outside flea markets, unless a special exception permit has been granted by the Board of Supervisors. 2. That the property will be developed so as to utilize landscaping and preserve existing vegetation where possible. No 2 5..8 October 27, 1987 more than 75$ of each building site will be developed for building and parking uses. 3. That all on-premises signage will aesthetically pleasing and be no more than 40 square feet in sign face area and no more than 8 feet in height. Outdoor advertising signs (billboards) will be prohibited. 4. That there will be no outdoor storage except under the following conditions: a. That it not be visible from the street. b. That it not be higher than the elevation of the building. c. That it not comprise an area greater than 50$ of the floor area of the building. d. That it be screened from view with landscaping and/or other approved screening materials in accordance with the provisions of the Roanoke County Ordinance. 5. That all utilities will be underground. 6. That there be no on-street parking. 7. That there will be sufficient truck loading spaces designed for each building site. 8. That the Petitioner will review the drainage situation for Valleypointe and implement a design for drainage facilities to either retain or detain the two (2) year storm (as has been .~ ~~!~ , ~ October 27, 1987 required by Roanoke County) and to consider retention or detention fora 10 year storm. 9. That all exterior lighting in parking areas on the northwest side of the project will be directed away from adjacent residential areas. 10. That primary access to the property will be from Peters (Creek Road. IN RE: CITIZENS COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS 1. Chuck Williams spoke concerning the poor condition of the athletic fields at the new William Byrd Middle School. Among the problems were lack of water to keep grass on the fields, the rocks, etc. that are in the field. He feels that the .contractor did not live up to the specifications in the contract. He presented photographs of the condition of the field. County Attorney Paul Mahoney was directed to study the specifications. He and County Administrator Elmer Hodge were directed to meet with the School Board personnel and report back to Mr. Williams and the Board of Supervisors on November 17, 1987. 2. Michael Ballard, 6438 Nell Drive, spoke concerning the chemical plant being planned at the corner of Old Hollins Road and Beaumont Drive. He invited all members of the Board of 260 October 27, 1987 Supervisors to attend the community meeting at Mountainview Elementary School that Supervisor Johnson has set up to discuss this issue. Supervisor Johnson announced that he is concerned about the proposed chemical plant and has set a community meeting for October 28, 1987 with the area residents and County staff to receive the concerns of the neighbors, and try to address their concerns. He pointed out that the land is presently zoned to allow for the chemical plant. IN RE: ADJOURNMENT At 8:30 p.m., Chairman Johnson adjourned the meeting Bob L. Johnson, Chairman Roanoke County Board of Supervisors V 1 ~- / November 17, 1987 _ --- _ - --- - - - - - - --- rr -- Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Roanoke County Administration Center 3738 Brambleton Avenue, SW Roanoke, Virginia 24018 November 17, 1987 The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors of Roanoke) County, Virginia, met this day at the Roanoke County's Administration Center, this being the third Tuesday, and the first regularly scheduled meeting of the month of November, 1987. IN RE: CALL TO ORDER Chairman Johnson called the meeting to order at 3:101 p.m. The roll call was taken. MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Bob L. Johnson, Vice Chairman Lee Garrett, Supervisors Alan H. Brittle, Steven A. McGraw, Harry C. Nickens MEMBERS ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator; John M. Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator for Management Services; John R. Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator of Public Facilities; Timothy W. Gubala, Assistant County Administrator for Community Development; Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney, Mary H. Allen, Deputy 2~~ November 17, 1987 Clerk; Alfred Anderson, County Treasurer; Reta Busher, Director of Management and Budget; Clifford Craig, Director of Utilities; George Garretson, Library Director; Wayne Compton, Commissioner of Revenue; Phillip Henry, Director of Engineering, D. Keith Cook, Director of Human Resources IN RE: OPENING CEREMONIES The invocation was given by The Reverend .Steve Harris, Baptist Childrens Home. The Pledge of Allegiance was recited by X11 present. IN RE: COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS County Administrator Elmer Hodge asked D. Keith Cook, Director of Human Resources to introduce the new officers of the Employee Advisory Committee. They are Lee Linkous, Chairman, Gerri Rorer, Vice Chairman, and Susie Owen, Secretary. Also present was the past President Gerald Holt. Mr. Linkous thanked the Board of Supervisors for their support. IN RE: PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS AND AWARDS Chairman Johnson presented a Certificate to Treasurer Alfred Anderson for completion of the NACTFO training program. t7 November 17, 1987 Mr. Anderson was present to receive the Certificate and explaine< the program under which he was certified. Proclamation declaring the week of November 15 21 1987 as American Education Week in Roanoke County: Chairman', Johnson presented this proclamation to Bayes Wilson,' Superintendent of Schools, Marty Robinson, County Schools and Becky Deaton of the Roanoke County Education Association. Mr. Wilson and Ms. Deaton thanked the Board for this presentation. Supervisor McGraw presented a gift to County Administrator Elmer Hodge from the board members in honor of his second anniversary with Roanoke County. IN RE: REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF I AGENDA ITEMS Mr. Hodge requested the addition of an Item under New Business, Reappropriation of Landfill funds to the Board Contingency Fund. IN RE: NEW BUSINESS 1. Approval of funding for sewer extension from Glade Creek Interceptor to Route 460: Director of Utilities Clifford Craig reported that the Comprehensive Plan has targeted the Bonsack area as one of the prime growth areas. The 16 inch ~~ November 17, 1987 water line that is being installed in this area will further encourage that growth. The staff feels that the Glade Creek Interceptor should be extended to the north side of Route 460. Funding for the project would be from the 1974 sewer bonds which (were previously approved for sanitary sewer interceptors. The staff recommends that the Board approve the funds for this project and authorize the County Administrator to acquire and accept the necessary easements. Supervisor Johnson inquired whether there would be hookup fees when the sanitary sewer is extended. Mr. Craig responded that there would be hookup fees. I ', Supervisor Johnson moved to approve the staff recommendation. The motion was seconded by Supervisor McGraw, and carried by the following recorded vote: .AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None I, 2. Approval of funding for sewer extension to Perimeter East and West Ruritan Road: Mr. Craig advised that in order to provide sewer service to Perimeter East it is required that the Glade Creek Interceptor be extended to Carson Road. The project has two phases, the first from the existing Glade Creek Interceptor to Carson Road. Phase 2 would increase the size of the line to Perimeter East and put it at a deeper elevation. The second phase will be done as a joint project with _26-~ November 17, 1987 the developer. The cost will be $65,200. The first phase will cost $45,000. The funding would come from the 1974 sewer bonds. The staff recommends that the Board approve funding for both phases of this project and authorize the County A dministrator to acquire and accept the necessary easements. Supervisor Johnson moved to approve the staff recommendation. The motion was seconded by Supervisor McGraw, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None 3. Resolution requestincr the Virginia Resources Authority to issue bonds for Utility Capital Improvements: Assistant County Administrator John Chambliss reported tha t the County citizens authorized approximately $14 million worth of sewer bonds for abolishment of the Public Service Authority and to extend sewer interceptors into areas of the County. In 1986, the bond referendum included $1 million for system acquisitions. Staff is now requesting permission to request the Virginia Resources Authority to issue the remaining $3.7 unissued sewer bonds and $1 million of 1986 water acquisition bonds, and water revenue bonds of $795,000 to serve economic development projects. The Virginia Resources Authority is the state agency used to fund both revenue and general obligation bonds for water, wastewater and stormwater projects. These bonds will probably be a 20-year :. ~ ~C November 17, 1987 issue. The staff recommends that a resolution be adopted and th I, necessary documentation completed to participate in a December meeting of the Virginia Resources Authority, and subsequent issuance of said bonds. Supervisor Garrett moved to approve the staff recommendation. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Nickens, land carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None RESOLUTION 111787-3 OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA, REQUESTING THE VIRGINIA RESOURCES AUTHORITY TO ISSUE BONDS ON BEHALF OF ROANOKE COUNTY TO FINANCE UTILITY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia, has determined that it is in the best interest of the County to apply to the Virginia Resources Authority for a loan in the amount of approximately $5,495,000 to finance the cost of the water and sewer projects of the County ("Project"). The loan will be evidenced by the General Obligation Bond Authority of the County of Roanoke, representing $3,700,000 for sewer public improvement bonds, authorized by the voters of Roanoke County in 1974; $1,000,000 of water public improvement bonds authorized in 1986 by the voters of Roanoke County a nd $795,000 of water revenue bonds of the County secured by a pledge of the revenues of the County's water system. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 2 6 '7 November 17, 1987 1. That the County Administrator is hereby authorize and directed to prepare and submit an application to the Virgini Resources Authority for a loan in the amount of approximatel $5,495,000 to finance the cost of the project. The Count Administrator is authorized to take such action as may b necessary or convenient to complete the application process. 2. That the final terms and conditions of the loan an the loan documents shall be subject to the approval of thi board . 3. Request from the Town of Vinton for increase in sewage volume allocation: Mr. Craig announced that the Tow Council of Vinton has requested that the County assign 500,00 gallons per day capacity in the Roanoke Regional Sewage Treatmen Plant and the Tinker Creek Interceptor for use by the Town o Vinton. After last spring's heavy rains the inflow an infiltration was to such an extent from Vinton that they are ove capacity in their previous allotment. They are implementing a. Inflow and Infiltration program and feel they can reduce thei infiltration over the next few years. Roanoke County does no have 500,000 excess capacity in the Tinker Creek Interceptor Until January Of 1990 we will have an excess capacity of 142,00 gallons per day. Staff recommends that the Town of Vinton use that capacity in the Tinker Creek Interceptor until 1990. After that time, Roanoke County will need that capacity. Staff further .,2~~8 November 17, 1987 recommends that Vinton be permitted to use the excess capacity in the Treatment plan to supply sewer services to the portion of the County in their service area, and that a letter be sent to the City of Roanoke and Town of Vinton that Vinton is authorized to use the excess capacity. The County should also suggest that the Town of Vinton begin an inflow and infiltration program. Supervisor Nickens advised that the Town of Vinton is now studying an I&I program. Supervisor Nickens moved to approve the staff recommendation. The motion was seconded by Supervisor McGraw, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None 5. Request from the Va. Department of Transportation for allocation of funds for the Starkey Road storm sewer project: Phillip Henry, Director of Engineering, reported that the the Board approved the expansion of the Starkey Roa d project, and included Penn Forest Boulevard from Starkey Road to, Chaparral Drive as part of the project. These projects fall under policies that require participation by the localities for storm sewers and sidewalk right-of-way when the construction involves curb and guttering. Mr. Henry stated there are three options available including a complete drainage program at a cost of $306,726, a detention facility, or no additional storm sewer 2 s~ s November 17, 1987 construction at no cost. Also the cost of curb and gutterin would be $72,300, or curb, guttering and sidewalk right-of-way a a cost of $161,800. Mr. Hodge presented the funding mechanism options. Th staff is proposing that the landowners affected by th improvements bear the cost of those improvements. Rather tha appropriate money from the general fund, these property owner should have a supplemental tax to offset the cost of thes improvements over three years. With board approval of thi funding method, the staff would meet with the adjoining propert owners and present the options for improvements, the cost of th improvements, and allow them to decide which options they woul prefer to pay for. Staff recommends proceeding with the curb an guttering at a local cost of $72,300 contingent on the propert owners' participation. Supervisor Johnson asked whether by giving the landowner an option, the County faces potential liability if the leas expensive option is chosen. Mr. Henry responded they ar recommending no improvements beyond the scope of the origina construction project for the storm sewer outfalls. They ar recommending curb and guttering for drainage from adjacen property at a cost of $72,300. Supervisor Nickens asked what would happen if th property owners elect not to participate. Mr. Hodge responde ~.~a o ;~ November 17, 1987 tha t is something that will have to be worked out. He would like to set a pattern for future road improvements similar to the Starkey Road project. If the County funds this project, then bother areas will request the same improvements at county cost. Supervisor Nickens reiterated that his concern was if all the property owners did not elect to participate. Mr. Mahoney responded that it could be done by referendum vote of the majority of property owners. If the majority approve, then all property owners must participate. The other alternative is a special assessment. The local governing body, by majority vote can impose a special assessment to those properties who would enjoy a specific benefit. Mr. Hodge advised that staff would like to move forward and meet with the property owners to explain the necessity of this funding method and advise them of the options. Fred Altizer, Va. Department of Transportation, was present. He stated that there will be other future road improvements that will require the same county participation. Supervisor Brittle moved to approve the staff recommendation. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Johnson, end carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson VAYS : None 2 ~' 1 _~ . November 17, 1987 Mr. Altizer stated he must have a resolution with commitment from Roanoke County before he can take it to.th Virginia Transportation Board. Mr. Hodge responded that he would have a.resolutio available for the December 1st board meeting. 6. Re uest for a royal to urchase two re lacement vehicles: This item will allocate funds to purchase ne vehicles for Procurement Services and the Director of Libraries The approximate cost for these vehicles is $23,000 Supervisor Brittle moved to approve the staf recommendation. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Johnson and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Johnson NAYS: Supervisor Nickens 7. Rea ro riation of Landfill Funds to the Board Contingency Fund: This item will reappropriate $49,390 fro the landfill account to the Board of Supervisor's Contingenc Fund. This will bring the balance of the Contingency Fund t $50,000. Supervisor Brittle moved to approve the staf recommendation. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Johnson and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None • t Y ~' • ' November 17, 1987 jIN RE: REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Request to reschedule public hearing on the Secondary Highway Six Year Construction Plan from November 17, 11987 to December 15, 1987: Supervisor Johnson moved to reschedule the public hearing.), The motion was seconded by Supervisor Nickens, and carried by a )unanimous voice vote. 2. Request to reschedule public hearing authorizing ~ condemnation and right-of-entry for Starkey Force Main and Gravity Sewer• Supervisor Brittle moved to reschedule public hearing Ito December 15, 1987. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Garrett, and carried by a unanimous voice vote. IIN RE: APPOINTMENTS Supervisor Brittle asked the Deputy Clerk to add the Cave Spring Planning Commission member to Appointments at the next~'i meeting. Chairman Johnson directed that the Human Services) Committee Appointments not be made and that the committee bed inactive until further notice. 2 ~' 3 November 17, 1987 _- -- --- n IN RE: REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS Supervisor Nickens announced he would present report at the evening session concerning a meeting he a ttended t. discuss the condition of the William Byrd athletic fields. IN RE: CONSENT AGENDA Supervisor Brittle moved to approve the Consent Agenda The motion was seconded by Supervisor Nickens, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None RESOLUTION N0. 111787-8 APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM J - CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of RoanokE County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That that certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for November 17, 1987, designated as Item - Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in a~ to each item separately set forth in said section designates Items 1 through 9, inclusive, as follows: :2 ~~` 4 .1 November 17, 1987 1. Minutes of Meeting - October 13, 1987 2. Request from the Town of Vinton to designate Larry A. Logan to act,as Hazardous Materials Coordinator for the Town of Vinton. 3. Acceptance of water facilities serving an office building on Centurion Road. 4. Approval of Resolution requesting the Va. Department of Transportation to accept the connecting road from Route 1890 and Route 1905 into the Secondary System as a Rural Addition. 5. Acceptance of easements, Lots 1 and 2, Section 3, Applewood, the Orchards. 6. Confirmation of Committee Appointments to the the Court Service Unit Advisory Council/Youth and Family Services Advisory Board, Mental Health Services Board of Directors, Recreation Commission. 7. Request from the City of Roanoke to prepay annexation indebtedness with Roanoke County. 8. Settlement of Board of Supervisors v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Co., and disbursal of settlement proceeds. 9. Acceptance of drainage easements, sanitary sewer easements, public utility easements and road right-of-way easements being dedicated to the; County - Southwest Industrial Park. ~ 2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this resolution. On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor Nickens, and upon the following recorded vote: ~~ ~~ ~~ ~ November 17, 1987 AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None RESOLUTION 111787-8.c REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF CONNECTING ROAD FROM ROUTE 1890 TO ROUTE 1905 INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanok County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That this matter came this day to be heard upon th proceedings herein, and upon the application of the connectinc roa d from Route 1890 to Route 1905 be accepted and made a part of the Secondary System of State Highways under Section 33.1-72.1 of the Virginia State Code. 2. That it appears to the Board that drainage easement and a fifty (50) foot right-of-way for said road have bee dedicated by virtue of a certain deeds which deeds are recorde in the records of the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court o Roanoke County, Virginia, and that by reason of the recordatio of said deeds, no report from a Board of Viewers, nor consent o donation of right-of-way from the abutting property owners i necessary. The Board hereby guarantees said right-of-way fo drainage. 3. That said road known as the connecting road from Rou 1890 to Route 1905 and which is shown on a certain sketc accompanying this Resolution, be, and the same is hereb X7,8 November 17, 1987 established as a public road to become a part of the State Secondary System of Highways in Roanoke County, only from and after notification of official acceptance of said street or highway by the Virginia Department of Transportation. On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor Nickens, and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None RESOLUTION 111787-8.f AUTHORIZING THE EARLY RETIREMENT OF INDEBTEDNESS OF THE COUNTY ASSUMED BY THE CITY OF ROANOKE WHEREAS, pursuant to Orders of Annexation, dated July 30, 1948, September 14, 1964, and May 10, 1975, effective January 1, 1949, January 1, 1965, and January 1, 1976, respec- tively, the City of Roanoke (hereinafter the "City") assumed cer- tain public debt of Roanoke County (hereinafter the "County"); and WHEREAS, pursuant to such Orders, the City is required to pay to the County a total of $109,180.13, representing princi- pal ($105,304.54) and interest ($3,875.59), for Fiscal Year 1987-' 88, and a total of $60,528.58 in principal payments for Fiscal Years 1988-89 through 1994-95; and WHEREAS, the City and County are in agreement that~~ early payment of the amounts due to the County from the City would be in the best interests of each party. 277 November 17, 1987 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervi- sors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the County agrees to accept payment of $109,677.60 on or before November 24, 1987, and payment of $59,777.40 on or before December 8, 1987, in full and complete satisfaction of the City's indebtedness to the County arising out of provisions of Orders of Annexation, dated July 30, 1948; September 14, 1964; and May 10, 1975, requiring the City to assume certain public debt of the County, in particular Section 5.A., Public Debt, of the Order of Annexation in Ivan R. Young, et al. v. City of Salem, Case No. 152-1965, May 10, 1975. 2. That the County Administrator is authorized to exe-I, cute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke!, County as may be necessary to accomplish- the purposes of this Resolution, all of which shall be upon form approved by the ,County Attorney. ', On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor Nickens, and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson INAYS: None IIN RE: REPORTS The following reports were received and filed: w November 17, 1987 1. Accounts paid for the month of October 1987. 2. Statement of the Treasurer's Accountability for the month of October 1987. 3. Status Report on Valley Metro extension on Brambleton Ave. Supervisor Johnson expressed appreciation to John Chambliss on the extension of Valley Metro to Brambleton Avenue. IN RE: WORK SESSION 1. 1988 Legislative Program County Attorney Paul Mahoney reported he had discussed with the various board members the issues for the 1988 session of the General Assembly. There were four specific issues of concern: (a) the recommendation of ,the Commission on Local Government Structures; (b) COT21 alternatives to enable local governments to address transportation related problems; (c) funding needs of constitutional officers; and JLARK recommendation concerning the formula for distributing state funds to localities for education. Other issue of interest were: allowing refuse collectio n trucks to be equipment with flashing, blinking or alternating blue or blue and red emergency lights; allowance of an increase in the law library fee from $2.00 to $3.00. 27 9 November 17, 1987 Mr. Mahoney also made several suggestions to amend th County charter as follows: (a) Amend Section 2.02 "Taxin Powers: to provide authority for the Board to levy a tax on meal and tobacco; (b) amend Chapter 9 to authorize the creation of th office of license inspection, authorizing the enforcement o license ordinances through the Office of the Commissioner o Revenue; and (c) Amend Section 9.03 to authorize the appointment of the members of the Board of Zoning Appeals by the Board o Supervisors. He asked the board members if they had additiona requests to make. Supervisor Nickens stated he strongly endorsed th taxing powers outlined for meals and tobacco. Supervisor Brittl requested that the lights on refuse collection trucks be change to allow flashing lights of any color. Supervisor McGraw requested board support for the 1/2 additional local option sales tax. Supervisor Johnson requested that the EXPLORE Projec Board of Directors be expanded to include local officials fr the governments affected by the project. Supervisor Nickens suggested that the board suppor Delegate Thomas' request for additional funding for parks usin recordation taxes. Supervisor McGraw stated he did not support this, but would prefer the 1/2~ local option sales tax, 28 ~ November 17, 1987 Supervisor Nickens stated he still would like board support for the additional park funding. IN RE: EXECUTIVE SESSION At 4:35 p.m., Supervisor Johnson moved to go into,, Executive Session pursuant to the Code of Virginia 2.1-344 (a) 1, 2, and 6 to consider a personnel matter, to consider a real estate matter and to discuss a legal matter. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Garrett and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisor Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None IN RE: OPEN SESSION At 5:15 p.m. Supervisor Johnson moved to return to Open Session. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Garrett and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisor Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None IN RE: RECESS ,28.1 November 17, 1987 - _ - - - - - - -- - - - ___ - - - ------ n -_ At 5:16 p.m., Chairman Johnson declared a dinner recess . IN RE: RECONVENEMENT At 7:10 p.m., Chairman Johnson called the meeting back to order . IN RE: REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS Su ervisor Nickens announced there was a meeting on November 16, 1987 concerning the conditions of the ball fields at ,William Byrd Middle School. The architect will be meeting with the contractors and the sub-contractors to determine what work has been done as part of the original specifications, and what has been done since at someone's expense other than Roanoke County. He expects a definitive statement within the next few weeks concerning the fields. IN RE: NEW BUSINESS 1. Request for the establishment of a volunteer fire com any in the Back Creek area: Fire and Rescue Chief Tommy Fuqua announced that there is a newly formed volunteer fire { ; . ~', V ~~ November 17, 1987 epartment in the Back Creek section, consisting of 32 people. even members are currently members of volunteer fire companies nd three are career fire personnel. He recognized Roger Vest nd Charlie Lavinder for their interest and coordination efforts. he elected fire chief is Lynn Thomas. Charlie Lavinder, resident of the Back Creek Civic League, introduced the other fficers of the league. Supervisor Garrett moved to recognize the Fire and Rescue ompany 11 - Back Creek as an official unit of the Fire and escue Department. The motion was seconded by Supervisor rittle, and carried by the following recorded vote: YES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson AYS: None RE: FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance authorizing accep tance of a donation of a of of real estate on Route 311 from the County School oard to the Board of Supervisors Mr. Mahoney reported that his property was originally declared surplus in 1976 by the chool Board to convey to Catawba Baptist Church. This church issolved itself and legal proceeding never transpired. The econd reading will be December 1, 1987. No citizens were present ~ speak to this ordinance. -28.3 November 17, 1987 Supervisor Nickens moved to approve first reading of th ordinance. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Brittle, an carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None 2. Ordinance accepting an offer or an Boulevard and Hemlock Road, City of Salem, tax map no. 194-1-1~1 ~~ the sale of surplus real estate, 37.863 acres located off Roanoke Mr. Mahoney announced that the County has received an offer t buy this property. The County has attempted to sell this surplu real estate for several years. The second reading will b December 1, 1987. No citizens were present to speak to thi ordinance. Supervisor Johnson moved first reading of the ordinance The motion was seconded by Supervisor Nickens, and carried by th following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None IN RE: SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1 Ordinance vacating the remaining Plat of Section One, Thorncrest Subdivision: Mr. Mahoney advised this was th second reading to vacate the plat, the first reading held o authorizin QQ .. ;~~v November 17, 1987 _- ctober 27, 1987. No citizens were present to speak to this rdinance. Supervisor Johnson moved to approve the second reading of he ordinance. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Garrett, nd carried by the following recorded vote: YES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson AYS: None ORDINANCE 111787-10 VACATING THE REMAINING PLAT OF SECTION ONE, THORNCREST SUBDIVISION WHEREAS, Lingerfelt Development Corporation; Colonial American National Bank, Trustee of the estate of Marshall L. arris, deceased; Elizabeth F. Harris; and Truck Enterprises, nc. have petitioned the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, irginia, to vacate the remaining plat of Section One, Thorncrest ubdivision; and WHEREAS, the petitioners are the owners and contract urchaser of a certain tract of land located in Roanoke County, eing identified as Tract 5, containing 0.847 acre, a portion of hich lies within the northeasterly boundary of Thorncrest Sub- ivision, said portion consisting of lots in Block l; and WHEREAS, the petitioners now desire that the remaining ortion of Section One, Thorncrest Subdivision be permanently acated in order that the Petitioners might use the same for the mprovement and enhancement of their property; and .2 8 5 November 17, 1987 WHEREAS, a public hearing and first reading on thi ordinance was held on October 27, 1987, and the second reading o this ordinance was held on November 17, 1987. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of S upervi- sors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the remaining plat of Section One, Thorncrest Subdivision dated August 17, 1948, revised September 28, 1948, and found in Plat Book 3, page 67, among the records of the Cler of the Circuit Court for the County of Roanoke, Virginia, is here by vacated, but subject to the rights of the owners of any publi utility installations previously erected therein, together wit the right of ingress and egress for the maintenance of such util ity installations. 2. That the Clerk of the Circuit Court is authoriz to take such action as may be necessary to accomplish the purpos and intent of this ordinance. On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Superviso Garrett, and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None 2. Ordinance accepting an offer for and authorizinc the lease of sur lus real estate, Old Bent Mountain Fire Station: Mr. Mahoney reported that the County has received an offer to lease this piece of property. The first reading was -R 2~8 fi November 17, 1987 held October 27, 1987. The offer received for rent was not an~ amount the County recommended. No citizen was present to speak) to this ordinance. Supervisor Garrett moved that this offer be denied. The motion was seconded by Supervisor McGraw, and carried by the) following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None Supervisor Garrett moved that the board reaffirm that this property is surplus and is available for lease or sale. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Johnson, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson YS: None 3 Ordinance accepting an offer for and authorizinq_ t. .. ...~,.~, i.F ~„rr,~„e Ycn~ oai-atP - WP~~ lc,t in otterview Garden subdivision: Mr. Mahoney announced that the County has) received an offer to purchase the abandoned well lot in Otterviewl! Gardens. The first reading was held October 27, 1987. The ounty has received an offer of $13,500 from L. Edgar Foley. taff recommends that the Board affirm that this property is surplus and accept the offer. No citizens were present to speak to the ordinance. ~" November 17, 1987 Supervisor Nickens moved to approve the second readi and accept the offer of $13,500 from L. Edgar Foley. The motio~ was seconded by Supervisor McGraw, and carried by the followin~ recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None ORDINANCE 11787-12 ACCEPTING AN OFFER FOR AND AUTHORIZING THE SALE OF SURPLUS REA L ESTATE, A WELL LOT LOCATED IN OTTERVIEW GARDENS SUBDIVISION WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.01 0 the Charter of Roanoke County, the subject property has been de Glared to be surplus; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 0 the Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading concerning th sale and disposition of the hereinafter-described real estate wa held on October 27, 1987, and the second reading was held o November 17, 1987; and WHEREAS, this real estate consists of a well lot to Gated on La ban Road in Otterview Gardens Subdivision; and WHEREAS, an offer has been received for this property from L. Edgar Foley in the amount of $13,500, and said offer is hereby accepted; all other offers are hereby rejected; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervi- sors of Roanoke County as follows: '{. ~ V~ V November 17, 1987 1. That the offer of L. Edgar Foley in the amount of $13,500 to purchase a well lot located in Otterview Gardens Subdivision, Tax Map No. 27.05-2-14 be, and hereby is, accepted; and 2. Tha t the County Administrator is authorized to exe- cute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanok e County as are necessary to accomplish the conveyance of said pro-, perty, all of which shall be upon form approved by the County Attorney; and 3. That all proceeds from the sale of this real estate) ire to be allocated to the capital reserves of the County. On motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by Supervisor McGraw, and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None IN RE: PUBLIC HEARINGS 1187-1 PETITION OF PLANTATION ENTERPRISES FOR A SPECIAL EXCEPTION PERMIT TO OPERATE A GOLF COURSE ON A 24.77 ACRE TRACT LOCATED AT 5621 PLANTATION ROAD IN THE HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT. The Petitioner, S. D. Stokes, Jr. announced that the actual acreage was 34.77, not 24.77 as listed in the agenda and, ~8,g November 17, 1987 report. Mr. Gubala stated this was a staff error, and was also erroneously advertised. Supervisor Johnson moved to continue the public hearing until December 15, 1987 and to readvertise with the correct acreage advertised. The motion was seconded by Supervisor McGraw and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisor Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None 1187-2 PETITION OF KEITH AND DIANE BRADSHAW FOR A SPECIAL EXCEPTION PERMIT TO OPERATE A CHILD CARE CENTER ON 1.58 ACRE TRACT LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF ROUTE 643 APPROXIMATELY 300 FEET NORTH OF ITS INTERSECTION WITH ROUTE 460 IN THE CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT Assistant County Administrator Timothy Gubala reported (that the petitioner has a concept plan to utilize 1.58 a cres as a Iday care center behind the Fort Lewis Fire Station. There will be traffic generated at peak periods of time, and staff recommends that the number of entrances be reduced from two to one. The staff also notes that the proposed parking ma y not meet actual customer demand and may need to be investigated during 'site plan review. Staff recommends approval with conditions limiting signage; the number of entrances, the number of parking spaces; and the type and extent of screening and buffering ~~necessary for safety purposes. .~ .; ~~ 9 0 November 17, 1987 Supervisor Johnson-asked if there is a state .agency regulating the number of children and physical size of the building. Mr. Gubala responded that the Department of Social Services monitors this. Supervisor McGraw asked when the sewer line construction would begin in the area, and would this imply the need for a traffic signal at that intersection? Mr. Gubala stated that the sewer line is under construction, but has not been extended that far yet. Supervisor Johnson directed staff to request a traffic count for the area. Ed Natt, attorney for the petitioner, was present. He advised they are willing to reduce the entrances to one and provide increased parking. They will also comply with the screening and buffering ordinance and limit the sign to 40 square feet. Supervisor McGraw moved to approve the Special Exception Permit with the following conditions: sign limited to 40 square feet, one entrance only approved by the Va. Dept of Transportation, screening and buffering in accordance with the County zoning ordinance, and additional parking spaces. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Nickens, and carried by the following recorded vote: ~I AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson YS : None 2~9.~ November 17, 1987 1187-3 PETITION OF BRAMBLETON MEDICAL ASSOCIATES REQUESTING REZONING FROM R-1 RESIDENTIAL TO B-1 BUSINESS AND AMENDMENT OF THE LAND USE PLAN OF A TRACT CONTAINING 1.48 ACRES LOCATED SOUTH OF 3142 BRAMBLETON AVENUE IN THE CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT Continued By the Planning Commission 1187-4 PETITION OF ROGER P. JEFFERSON REQUESTING REZONING FROM B-1 BUSINESS TO B-2 BUSINESS AND M-1 INDUSTRIAL OF A TRACT CONTAINING 1.35 ACRES AND LOCATED AT THE SOUTH WEST INTERSECTION OF STARREY ROAD AND PENN FOREST BOULEVARD IN THE CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT. APPROVED WITH PROFFERED CONDITIONS Mr. Gubala reported this was heard by the Planning Commission on November 5th. It is in a Transition Area. Ther are five proffered conditions relating to construction an conformance to the conceptual plan. The portion to be rezoned t M-1 only is to be used for retail storage. There are restrictions relating to sign structure. The use is restricted to operation of a convenience store on parcel one and operation of office complex and storage on parcels two and three. This is' an expansion of Mr. Jefferson's present business on the property. The Planning Commission recommended approval 3 to 2. Mr. Jefferson was present with John Parker of T. P. Parker who prepared the site plan. ~+ November 17, 1987 Prior to the discussion of the rezoning, Supervisor~l Johnson explained to the petitioners the action taken earlier i the meeting concerning the potential cost participation in the) Starkey Road improvements by property owners on Starkey Road. Kenneth King, attorney for the petitioners, pointed out) that the proffered site plan shows that the entrances on Penn! Forest Boulevard are subject to the Va. Department of Transportation relocation and acquisition of right-of-way for the road improvements. Mr. Hodge explained the process by which the adjacent landowners will have the option to participate in the cost of curb and guttering, drainage and sidewalks. The options chosen will determine how much land may be taken from the petitioner. After conferring with the petitioners, Mr. King responded) that he would prefer to go forward with the rezoning, but that) the site plan may have to be modified based on the decisions) concerning the Starkey Road project. Supervisor Brittle moved to approve the petition. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Nickens, and carried by the'I following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson IINAYS: None FINAL ORDER 293 November 17, 1987 _ - _ _ _ - -- -_ _ --- -- - ----------n------ NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDERED that the aforementione parcels of land which are contained in the Roanoke County Ta~ Maps as Parcel 1, 2, 3 and recorded in Deed Book 1272, Page 794 Deed Book 1198, Page 1051 and Deed Book 1194, Page 0001 anc legally described be rezoned from Parcel 1, B-1, Parcel 2, B-1 and Parcel 3, B-1 District to Parcel 1, B-2, Parcel 2, B-2, anc Parcel 3, M-1 District. TT Tf !'~L~T 1 BEGINNING at a point on the west side of Starkey Road (formerly Route 119), said point being the corner between Lots 1 and 2 of the Map of Willow Dell Subdivision; thence leaving said Point of Beginning and following the west side of Starkey Road, S. 3° 51'W. 54 feet to a point; thence continuing with Starkey Road S. 80 11'W. 66.4 feet to a point; thence cotninu9ing with Starkey Road, S. 110 16'W. 13.8 feet to a point, corner to Lots 3 and 4 of said subdivision; thence leaving Starkey Road and following the line between Lots 3 and 4, then Lots 10 and 4, S . 840 55' W. 243. 9 feet to the rear corner of Lot 10 and Lot 4 of said subdivision thence with an existing boundary line through Lot 11 of said subdivision, S. 85~ 00' W. 15 feet to a point; thence N. 5° 00' W. 128.2 feet to a point on the south side of the Old Floyd Road; thence N. 850 00'E. 15.0 feet to the front corner between Lots 10 and 11 of said subdivision; thence crossing the Old Floyd Road, N. 85° 00' E. 150.0 feet to the front corner between lots 10 and 11 of said subdivision; thence crossing the Old Floyd Road, N. 850 00' E. 20.1 feet to a point; thence 550 10'E. 46.7 feet to a point, corner to Lot 1 of said subdivision; thence with the line between Lot 10 and Lot 1 and Lot 3 and Lot 1 and Lot 2 and Lot 1, S. 89° 21; E. 211.0 feet to the point of BEGINNING and being all of Lots 2, 3 and 10 and a portion of Lot 11 of Willow Dell Subdivision and containing 0.878 a cre and being all of the property acquired by Roger P. Jefferson in Deed Book 1194, Page 001 and Deed Book 1198, Page 1051 ,-. 2~ 9~ 4 .• November 17, 1987 of record in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County. And excepting a strip 25 foot wide along northerly boundary of Lots 2 and 3 known as Floyd Road Drive. And there is reserved along the northerly side of Lot 10 and the 15 foot strip designated New 3A a 30 foot strip for a roadway. PARCEL 2 BEGINNING at a point on the west side of Starkey Road (Formerly Route 119), said point being the common corner between Lots 4 and 5 of Willow Dell Subdivision; thence leaving said point of Beginning and following the west side of Starkey Road; S. 13° 21; W. 75.6 feet to a point, corner to Lots 5 and 6; thence between Lots 4 and 5, S. 83° 51'W. 84.0 feet to a point thence with a new zoning line through Lot 5, N. 50 24'W 72.69 feet to a point on the line of Lots 4 and 5; thence with a line between Lots 4 and 5, N. 84° 36'E. 108.29 feet to the point of BEGINNING and being Parcel 2 containing 0.159 acre. PARCEL 3 BEGINNING at a point on the common line between Lots 5 and 6 of Willow Dell Subdivision; said Point of Beginning, being, S. 830 51'W. 84.0 feet from the common front corner of Lots 5 and 6 of said subdivision, said point fronting on Starkey Road; thence leaving said Point of Beginning and following a line between Lots 5 and 6 S. 83° 51'W. 106.40 feet to a common corner between Lots 5, 6, 8 and 9; thence with the line between Lots 8 and 9, S. 850 00' W. 18.61 feet to a point; thence with a new zoning line through Lot 9 N. 5° 24'W. 79.26 feet to a point; thence with another new zoning line through Lot 9 and Lot 4 of said subdivision, N. 840 36' 00" E. 125.00 feet to a point;thence with another new zoning line and adjoining Parcel 2, S. 50 24' E. 78.0 feet to the Point of BEGINNING and being Parcel 3 containing 0.226 acre. PROFFER OF CONDITIONS 1. All construction will be in reasonable conformance the Conceptual Plan submitted herewith. ~~`~ November 17, 1987 Tna C a r~P i rPC1uPS tPa Lo ne GOnPQ 'ri ~ wl ~ L ~~iii~ . P _ _____ li used for retail storage of paper, business forms and computer supplies. 3. The Convenience Store sign proposed at the intersection of Starkey Road and Penn Forest Boulevard will have a maximum sign area of 96 square feet. The total height of the sign will be 25 feet including structural supports. The bottom of the sign will be approximately 9 feet from the ground elevation. 4. The use of the property will be limited to operation of a convenience store on Parcel 1 and the operation of an office complex and storage building on Parcels 2 and 3. 5. The owner will make no requests for or allow the construction of billboard type signs on Parcel 1, Parcel 2 or Parcel 3. 1187-5 PETITION OF M. T. HOLDING COMPANY REQUESTING REZONING FROM B-2 BUSINESS TO M-1 INDUSTRIAL OF A PORTION OF A TRACT CONTAINING 0.56 ACRE AND LOCATED AT 3639 BRAMBLETON AVENUE IN THE WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT APPROVED WITH PROFFERED CONDITIONS Mr. Gubala reporting that this rezoning is in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan. There was no opposition at the ~;;29s November 17, 1987 Planning Commission meeting. There was one concern from a neighbor over whether this would be open on Sunday. There are six proffered conditions concerning use of the property. Supervisor Garrett asked if this business didn't exist prior to this rezoning. Mr. Gubala responded that previously the property was used for repair of small engines, even through the business license was issued for automobile sales and parts. The petitioner bought the building with the understanding it could be ~~,used for automobile repair business and did not know he would have to rezone until he applied fora business license. Ed Natt, attorney for the petitioner, presented the (previous history of use for the property. It has been used for automobile repair for approximately four years. He also stated that the noise should not be a problem because the work will be confined to inside a building during regular hours. Supervisor Brittle moved to approve the petition. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Nickens, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None FINAL ORDER .. 2 9 .T November 17, 1987 NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDERED that the aforementioned parcel of land, which is contained in the Roanoke County tax Maps as a portion of Parcel #77-09-4-47 and legally described below be rezoned from B-2, General Commercial to M-1, Light Industrial District. BEGINNING at a point at the northeast corner of the property of WADO Corporation (Deed Book 1198, Page 144); thence N. 580 00' E. 90.00 feet to a point thence S. 32° 00' E. 70.00 feet to a point; thence S. 58° 00'W. 90.00 feet to a point; thence N. 320 00' W. 70.00 feet to a point. PROFFER OF CONDITIONS 1. The M-1 use is limited to an automotive repair shop only in the existing structure. No additions will be made to the structure. 2. There will be no outdoor overnight parking of customers' vehicles (licensed or unlicensed) after closing each day with the exception of vehicles left by customers after closing hours. 3. No outside storage of materials 4. No stand alone signage. Sign will be part of existing sign structure. 5. There will be no business operation after 9:00 p.m. Monday through Saturday, and no business operation Sunday. 2.9. ~ .. " November 17, 1987 6. The zoning will revert to B-2 zoning should the use as an au omo ive repair s p - __.. - - ----- _-- _-------- - ---- - ---- - _. _ _ _ - _ u Supervisor Johnson requested that Citizens Comments be Beard prior to the last Public Hearing. IN RE: CITIZENS COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS Mr. Chuck Williams thanked Supervisor Nickens for his fforts to improve the conditions of the ball fields at William yrd Middle School, and asked him to reiterate what was discussed t the meeting concerning this subject. Supervisor Nickens reported that a meeting was held with he architect, members of the school administration, Elmer Hodge nd Paul Mahoney. Mr. Williams asked how the money was ppropriated. Supervisor Nickens responded that the part of the oney was left from a 1969 bond issue, part from the Literary oan program and part from the 1984 bond issue. Supervisor ickens assured Mr. Williams that no more taxpayers money will be pent on these fields. It was the intent of all those school dministration staff who attended the meeting that the fields ill be ready when school starts, but not necessarily for total se by the Booster Clubs because of the need to get the grass stablished. Mr. Williams responded that he still did not feel 299 November 17, 1987 that the problem was being addressed quickly enough. Supervisor Nickens suggested that Mr. Williams discuss this with Mr. Hodge after the meeting. IN RE: PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued) 1187-6 PUBLIC HEARING FOR COMMENT UPON ROANOKE COUNTY'S REQUEST THAT THE 1988 GENERAL ASSEMBLY AMEND ITS CHARTER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 2.02: TAXING POWERS, SECTION 8.03: OFFICE OF LICENSE INSPECTIONS, AND SECTION 9.03: BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS County Attorney Paul Mahoney described the proposed amendments to the County Charter that the County is requesting from the General Assembly. The Taxing Powers amendment would authorize a meals tax and a tobacco tax. The Office of License Inspections would authorize the creation of License Inspections in the Commissioner's Office to have the enforcement authority to enforce the various license ordinance provisions. The amendment 'to Section 9 would authorize the appointment of the Board of Zoning Appeals by the Board of Supervisors. The following citizens spoke concerning various ~~amendments to County Charter: 1. E. C. Warren, 2522 Colonial Avenue, Roanoke, lVirginia 24015, Past President of the Virginia Restaurant ,- . 3 0 +~ November 17, 1987 Association, and represents the restaurants in this area. He spoke in opposition to the amendment to authorize a meals tax. 2. James Walker, 3313 Stonehenge Square, Roanoke,! Virginia, 24018 spoke in opposition to the amendment authorizing the Commissioner of Revenue's office to enforce the various license ordinance provisions. He also requested a more comprehensive and complete notification process concerning public hearings. He was concerned with the cost of such a program and duplication, since the Sheriff's Department already has this authority. His other concerns were opposition to the meals tax and appointment of the Board of Zoning Appeals by the Board of Supervisors. 3. Roger Walker, 5444 Lamplighter Drive, Roanoke, Virginia 24019, spoke in favor of the tobacco tax, but in opposition to the meals tax. He also was opposed to the Office of License Inspection and the change of the appointments of the~i Board of Zoning Appeals. He expressed concern about the lack of notification concerning public hearings of interest to the citizens. 4. James Horn, 5509 Lamplighter Drive, Roanoke, Virginia, asked if Roanoke County could impose a 1/2~ additional 3 0 =Y November 17, 1987 local option tax as an amendment to the Charter. Supervisor Johnson stated this was a state tax that would be returned to the local governments and did not think it was constitutional toll impose such a tax, but he would investigate the possibility. 5. Pamela Glover, 3051 Glenmont Drive, Roanoke, Virginia 24018 also spoke in opposition to the charter) amendments. IN RE: OTHER BUSINESS 1 Salary Increase for the County Attorney: Supervisor Johnson announced that a salary survey had been' conducted on the position of County Attorney, and the results reflected that an increase was necessary to keep this position competitive with similar positions throughout the state. Supervisor Brittle moved that the salary of the County ,Attorney be increased by five percent, effective January 1, 1988. (This increase would be from $53,928 to $56,624. The motion was ~~seconded by Supervisor Garrett and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson AYS: None ~3 0-~ 2 November 17, 1987 IN RE: ADJOURNMENT At 9:10 p.m., Chairman Johnson declared the meeting adjourned. Bob L. Johnson, Chairman Roanoke County Board of Supervisors ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE January 12, 1988 SUBJECT: Confirmation of Committee Appointments COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The following nominations were made at the previous board meeting and must now be confirmed by the Board of Supervisors. The nominee has agreed to serve. Library Board• Supervisor Garrett has nominated Mr. A. Edward Humphries to a four-year term. His term will expire December 31, 1991. SUBMITTED BY: Mary H. Allen Deputy Clerk APPROVED BY: ~~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ------------------- ------------------------- ACTION VOTE No Yes At Approved ( ) Motion by: Brittle - Denied ( > Received ( ) Referred To Garrett Johnson McGraw Nickens ITEM NUMBER ~' ~ ~' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: January 12, 1987 SUBJECT: Acceptance of Snowgoose Circle into the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Region Properties, Inc. developer of Penn Forest, Section 18 Subdivision, requests that the Board of Supervisors approve a resolution to the Virginia Department of Transportation requesting that they accept 0.14 miles of Snowgoose Circle from Penguin Drive to the cul-de-sac into its Secondary Road System. The staff has inspected this road along with representatives of the Virginia Department of Transportation and find the road is acceptable. The developer has committed to complete minor curb and gutter repair in the Spring of 1988. FISCAL IMPACT: No County funding is required. RECOMMENDATIONS: The staff recommends that the Board approve a resolution to the VDOT requesting that they accept Snowgoose Circle into the Secondary Road System. SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED: _ ~ ~~ ~ Phillip Henry, P E. Elmer C. Hodge Director of Engineering County Administrator 4 L- ~~ Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by: ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs Robers Garrett Johnson McGraw Nickens AT THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA. HCENTER ONETUESDAYE JANUARYA12IN1988ATION RESOLUTION REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF SNOWGOOSE CIRCLE INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That this matter came this day to be heard upon the proceedings herein, and upon the application for Snowgoose Circle from Penguin Drive to the Cul-de-Sac to to be accepted and made a part of the Secondary System of State Highways under Section 33.1-229 of the Virginia State Code. 2. That it appears to the Board that drainage easements and a fifty (50> foot right-of-way for said road has been dedicated by virtue of a certain map known as Penn Forest Section #18 which map was recorded in Plat Book 9, Page 331, of the records of the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, on July 23, 1985 and that by reason of the recordation of said map no report from a Board of Viewers, nor consent or donation of right-of-way from the abutting property owners is necessary. The Board hereby guarantees said right-of-way for drainage. 3. That said road known as Snowgoose Circle and which is shown on a certain sketch accompanying this Resolution, be, and the same is hereby established as a public road to become a part of the State Secondary System of Highways in Roanoke County, only from and after notification of official acceptance of said street or highway by the Virginia Department of Transportation. . _, ,~~.. \® '~ r= L;3~V8FllF woof 9M1r ~®~; -~. iY(l[''j',h tawwF -f~'~ ~ ~~ 6 RD ee~ ~ ® ~ $ $' ~. «~` 4444, ~ 7 , Ip„c,o~4 ,; , ~ ~. ~ - 3: ~,, 613 BE~E~IEA~E ,`~ ~P? '. ~, ~~~0.0: . d. ~ i ~IK,II~IELD9 ~~~~j o~O-~1/ sr~_' 9 mom, 's d`wnN.~1'~ ~ i, ~rwvKr ' ~ ~ MI('FFFIF(OS `~_ ~.. ~,~1p! `., ~# ~ ~ ~ ,,wru~yyfl ~ / ., ~i '~~ ~ .~ ~~~ ~ - ~~aROSEV- -' ,q. \ SPR~N~~~~ ac~~~~'_ ~~, `•'AOr~~ ~~~ /_!!40 `. )f~ ~ ~,~ MOMEW000 1 / ~~1RgV~gp~ -kCe~T~/~ ~ ~~ ~d. ya.~ 4~~e~ `~~1 «o.c+ooo• /~)l _ `J ROSEUI ~sw+o,wr•r : Qy~ tc Jy„~ ~-~ `.~ ~'~ cur !` ~.. ! J ~~} ~ % ILIA n_ ~r,~, sc"°°l u ~j~'y /~„- i \ "~~~' ~ ~' N ~~'l0; . F 4 REST ~. ~ l / ~ I e~ A~.n~~``Q:~P ~o .P ,,~a~~VICINITY MAP ~;y'°~°' ~,.,.._~ o O tti. ~. ` of lv 6 s ! 41 + la~aT 9.9a ~ '_, o° 1 4 w1 a1 `F27 ~ ? ng2 26 ~ ze 192 ~a.19 79 ~917~ '9/ ! , ~ ~.ls 13.1 s f ~ 22 e~ ' t` r s~t''f'q V 67' 18 9 21 . toy ~' z"• 4 N: r • i ' ' 1a1. Keswick' Tf°i1 3 : ° sass l! l~zs/ uV °_ 35 _ c l l ? `O FI ~ ti9 `Ff ~ fD ,~' Y / I 6' ' ' 9tilO /~ q ?ry 2 o'b 9~ ~ l! Sf p ~~ r~ 3 24 ,a °,, ~~ , ~,TT +„ 4 ,. A - ~ 119.01 ~ ~yP :. 5 ,r:`s9 M , ` ~~ Ii 'b ~ ',, Y' .~ J'of 6 `~ - s c ^' .,o s ., ff ~ ~ N S! '7~ ', r~ ~ 7 .~ 21 f _ e ~ 1 b, ?J 7 1 b~' / „^ 19 ! ' fi ,~ ! ~ S $ ~~ N ~ o ,a w . 27 °~. 18 °• / r K N ~ N ~~\ N_ C~ 'A l~ ~ ~ CS i d° ~ 17 ! _ ~~ ~--3cc. -Q NORTH r W tt R R 1 .~q~ JJ ~ . ~ 4 ~..:~ los I9 ~~ ` los v 1,> alp ~ Kenwick ~, I '°° . ~ ., 2 0 ~ .. 3 22 - 0 4 N A y n I n ~ la.a s ~ ~~~~ rF ° 1a.,9 Fa.t -- ~ DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC FACILITIES Acceptance of Snowgoose Circle AT THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JANUARY 12, 1988 RESOLUTION 11288-8.b REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF SNOWGOOSE CIRCLE INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That this matter came this day to be heard upon the proceedings herein, and upon the application for Snowgoose Circle from Penguin Drive to the Cul-de-Sac to to be accepted and made a part of the Secondary System of State Highways under Section 33.1-229 of the Virginia State Code. 2. That it appears to the Board that drainage easements and a fifty (50) foot right-of-way for said road has been dedicated by virtue of a certain map known as Penn Forest Section #18 which map was recorded in Plat Book 9, Page 331, of the records of the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, on July 23, 1985 and that by reason of the recordation of said map no report from a Board of Viewers, nor consent or donation of right-of-way from the abutting property owners is necessary. The Board hereby guarantees said right-of-way for drainage. 3. That said road known as Snowgoose Circle and which is shown on a certain sketch accompanying this Resolution, be, and the same is hereby established as a public road to become a part of the State Secondary System of Highways in Roanoke County, only from and after notification of official acceptance of said street or highway by the Virginia Department of Transportation. On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor Garrett, and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None A COPY - TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors 1/13/88 cc: File Phillip Henry, Director of Engineering John Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator Va. Department of Transportation Arnold Covey, Director of Development Review G OF THE BOARD OF CUOUNTYIADMINOISTRATNONE t,~ TIN R~~v~NMAE REENTER ONETUOSDAY , JANUARY 12 , 1988 AT TN TY ' ~i CE co~~' 11288-8•c REQUESVENGANDCSTONECMILL DRIVE RESOLUTION MILL POND DRI , lylLLWHEEL DRIVE' DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION INTO THE VIRGINIA SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM Supervisors of Roanoke Boa of by the BE IT RESOLVED _ as follows to be heard upon the Yginia, day Vi came this ~ountY' this matter Drive, That a lication of Millwheel ], , th Pp ted and made a and upon to be accep proceedings herein, D~;ive and Mil , ,~ Section Stone hways under d Drive' ofi State Hig Mill Pon System part of the $eCondary of the Virginia State I,de' at drainage easements 33.1-229 the Board th it appears to has been 2• That for said roads foot right of ,way (50) as Woodbridge, Section and a f fifty known of a certa n maP Book 9, virtue in plat dedicated by map was recorded Subdivision whlc of the Clerk's 6, ~~ and 9 - e 10, of the records gook 10, Pag Virginia, on page 175, 249, CountY~ Cour of Roanoke by the Circuit 1986 and that Office of June 11, 11, 1 83 and of 21, 1980, May ort from a Board August no rep of said maP from the reason of the recordation of ht_of_way rig or ovation hereby nor consent The Board Viewers, is necessary• roperty owners abutting P for drainage. ht-of-wa Drive, Mill Pond guarantees said rig known as Millwheel That said roads on a certain 3. shown which is Dri e and hereby and Stone Mill the same is Drive, be, and an ing this R solution, of the State sketch accomp Y become a part ro ds to established as public Secondary System of Highways in Roanoke County, only from and after notification of official acceptance of said streets or highways by the Virginia Department of Transportation. On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor Garrett, and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None A COPY - TESTS: Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors 1/13/88 cc: File Phillip Henry, Director of Engineering Va. Department of Transportation John Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator Arnold Covey, Director of Development Review AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JANUARY 26, 1988 RESOLUTION 11288-8.d OF SUPPORT FOR STATE FUNDING OF THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF AGING BE I'1' RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: WHEREAS, the Area Agencies on Aging which provides community-based services to our older citizens have become more proficient in the location and identification of elderly people whose needs remain totally or marginally unmet; and WHEREAS, these stressful problems include, but are not limited to nutrition programs such as Meals-on-Wheels and Diners Clubs, respite care, home repairs, ombudsman services and homemaker care; and WHEREAS, the number of the often frail needy elderly grow in consonance with the overall rapid increase of our older population which continues to increase more rapidly than the general population; and WHEREAS, the mechanism for satisfying unmet needs exists and functions through the League of Older Americans in Roanoke and in every area of the state through its remaining 24 Agencies on Aging; and WHEREAS, it has become impossible to stretch further the funds currently available to fulfill present schedules of services and programs for the elderly and also to relieve the unmet needs. THER%FORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia does hereby urge the Governor of Virginia to take action requested by the Virginia Department for the Aging to help it to respond fully with a range of locally determined life sustaining services to needy elderly Virginians. On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor Garrett, and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None A COPY - TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors 1/13/88 cc: File League of Older Americans ITEM NUMBER ~ '~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: January 12, 1988 SUBJECT: Acceptance of Millwheel Drive, Mill Pond Drive, and Stone Mill Drive into the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Westclub Corporation the developer of Woodbridge, Section 9, requests that the Board of Supervisors approve a resolution to the Virginia Department of Transportation requesting that they accept 0.06 miles of Millwheel Drive, 0.16 miles of Mill Pond Drive, and 0.085 miles of Stone Mill Drive. The staff has inspected these representatives of the Virginia Department find the roads are acceptable. FISCAL IMPACT: No County funding is required. RECOMMENDATIONS: roads along with of Transportation and The staff recommends that the Board approve a resolution to the VDOT requesting that they accept Millwheel Drive, Mill Pond Drive and Stone Mill Drive into the Secondary Road System. SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED: .~ ~~ ~ c ~- ~~ Phillip Henry, P.E. Elmer C. Hodge Director of Engineering County Administrator ~- 3 6 Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by: ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs Robers Garrett Johnson McGraw Nickens L-mod AT THE REGULAR MEETINGELD ATETHEP'ROANOKEUCOUNTYOADMINISTRATION COUNTY, VIRGINIA, H CENTER ON TUESDAY, JANUARY 12, 1988 RESOLUTION REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF MILLWHEEL DRIVE. MpEPARTMENTROFETRANSPORTATIONLL DRIVE INTO THE VIRGINIA SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That this matter came this day to be heard upon the proceedings herein, and upon the application of Millwheel Drive, Mill Pond Drive, and Stone Mill Drive to be accepted and made a part of the Secondary System of State Highways under Section 33.1-229 of the Virginia State Code. ' 2. That it appears to the Board that drainage easements and a fifty (50) foot right-of-way for said roads has been dedicated by virtue of a certain map known as Woodbridge, Section 6, 7, and 9 Subdivision which map was recorded in Plat Book 9, Page 175, 249, Book 10, Page 10, of the records of the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, on August 21, 1980, May 11, 1983 and June 11, 1986 and that by reason of the recordation of said map no report from a Board of Viewers, nor consent or donation of right-of-way from the abutting property owners is necessary. The Board hereby guarantees said right-of-way for drainage. _ _ _ ~~ JfIYI~S + ~+"N ''! ..:- ~~ 00.. cam ` /~,~ ,1 SOUTMSIOE pR \~,\ ~ i •~-~//\/ ~/~t~/\J ~~' ,~~T-t .: •y~.dre - MWS-~•-- ~ col l r /~ ,~ ` / / ~ / ~ .MK~~~~~ .::,s~ M~~~- M s pENIEV ~1~~ r~~?L~ „ q' l~, `~. , ~ w y~ ~ r,. ~ .:-r'ANTRM STJ I iQO ~''~7t~ ^~- 639 1` NILL i yT ~ o~/ . d • ~ ~_ 8 ~s I /•• *~~._y/`sue/} I f~µ~~/~ ~`-~ ~ .>~ •~ ~ .. '::~ 1.~r~' ~ ~~~ ~ a~QE ~ NORTH ~J .._ _ Sal m County .. _ _ _ _ R O~ o°nelt. Rlr°r Rt. 639 i 5 r . ' ~ ~ t , t ...~.. w ~,,, , Y rs.r 7 _~6 ~ 2 ~ 15 I~ / 10 ~' 13 ~ IE • s '• M ' ~ ''i19' tfi'~ 12` ~ ~ P 9 •"' 2 ~~f o' ~ 23 s ., 8 ri ~ /i ~ ~ ,p ' w • 31 .,~ f 4 ' " ~ 25 `!-~~ a OG Irw i. ar ~2 ~ t 3 r 24 • t ~ . es qe .i s.a. "~ 2~ ~ " .t ~ a a ~`' I I s 2 ~: ~I " t a /i 5. 6 t 20 • s 28 O p s ~ 3p 9 s • P i 44~' ~ • 6 '° •' - ~~ 0 19 ~ ~~~ I I0 n " ~ ~ •` ° 4~ 9 ~ O ?~y~ ~ •~ r 33 ~~ ~t ° ' 41. g/fi Q q " •~ 4 5~ ' ~ ~: . ' S ~ O ~ a > e . 1 0 39. • . t r38 • • 46' 7 " P W Ms...ooo " ~ " 50 a ,;,, 5~ of .'~ So~em' 51 ~ c w ,, ~ ~~^ ua C ~ IBS o ""~y ~ ' ~ 14 tatty oonoke R t `~ ~ ' ~ 15 "' DEPARTMENT OF Acceptance of Millwheel Drive, Mill Pond Drive PUBLIC FACILITIES and Stone Mill Drive L-3~ 3. That said roads known as Millwheel Drive, Mill Pond Drive, and Stone Mill Drive and which is shown on a certain sketch accompanying this Resolution, be, and the same is hereby established as public roads to become a part of the State Secondary System of Highways in Roanoke County, only from and after notification of official acceptance of said streets or highways by the Virginia Department of Transportation. ITEM NUMBER ~ '" '~ f,~ --:= AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: January 12, 1988 SUBJECT: Approval of Resolution of Support for request by the Virginia Department of the Aging for state funding COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The League of Older Americans has asked that the Board of Supervisors support the request of the Virginia Department of the Aging for a 13.2 million biennium budget. These funds will be apportioned out to the 25 area agencies on aging, which includes the League of Older Americans. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors approve the attached resolution supporting this request for state funding of these agencies, and that a copy of the resolution be sent to the League of Older Americans. ~~ Elmer C. Hod e County Administrator ----------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Garrett Received ( ) Johnson Referred McGraw To Nickens Robers L -~ ~-,/ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JANUARY 26, 1988 RESOLUTION OF SUPPORT FOR STATE FUNDING OF THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF AGING BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: WHEREAS, the Area Agencies on Aging which provides community-based services to our older citizens have become more proficient in the location and identification of elderly people whose needs remain totally or marginally unmet; and WHEREAS, these stressful problems include, but are not limited to nutrition programs such as Meals-on-Wheels and Diners Clubs, respite care, home repairs, ombudsman services and homemaker care; and WHEREAS, the number of the often frail needy elderly grow in consonance with the overall rapid increase of our older population which continues to increase more rapidly than the general population; and WHEREAS, the mechanism for satisfying unmet needs exists and functions through the League of Older Americans in Roanoke and in every area of the state through its remaining 24 Agencies on Aging; and WHEREAS, it has become impossible to stretch further the funds currently available to fulfill present schedules of services and programs for the elderly and also to relieve the unmet needs. .~.. !. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia does hereby urge the Governor of Virginia to take action requested by the Virginia Department for the Aging to help it to respond fully with a range of locally determined life sustaining services to needy elderly Virginians. A-11288-8.e ITEM NUMBER ~~ `~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: January 12, 1988 SUBJECT: Request for approval for a Bingo Permit from the Loyal Order of Moose Lodge No. 284 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Loyal Order of Moose, Lodge No. 284 has requested a Bingo Permit. This application has been reviewed by the Commissioner of Revenue and he recommends that it be approved. The organization has paid the $25.00 fee RECOMMENDATION• It is recommended that the application for a Bingo Permit be approved. SUBMITTED BY: Mary H. Allen Deputy Clerk ACTION VOTE Approved (x) Motion by: Bob L. Johnson/Lee No Yes A Denied ( ) Garrett to approve Garrett _~ _ Received ( ) Referred To APPROVED BY: ~ol~ti~-/ Elmer C. Hod County Administrator Johnson _~ McGraw -~- Nickens ~ Robers _~~ cc: File Bingo File L- COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA COMMISSIONER OF THE REVENUE APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO CONDUCT RAFFLES OR BINGO Application is hereby made for a bingo game or raffle permit. This application is made subject to all County and State laws, ordinances, rules, and regulations now ire d cto by the undebe enacted hereafter and which are hereby ag signed applicant and which shall be deemed a condition under which this permit is issued. All applicants should exercise extreme care to ensure the accames cy of their responses to the following questions. Bingo g and raffles are strictly regulated by Title 18.2-340.1 et. sew. of the criminal statutes of the Virginia Code, and by Section 4-86 et. seg. of the Roanoke County Code. These laws authorize the County Board of Supervisors to conduct a reasonable investiga- tion prior to granting a bingo or raffle permit.. The Board has sixty days from the filing of an application to grant or deny the permit. .T nefounddnotytoebe~inustrict ~ompliancetwithe county and organizatio state law. Any person violating county or state regulations concerning these permits shall be guilty of a Class 1 misdemeanor. Any person who uses any part of the gross receipts from bingo or raffles for any purpose other than the lawful religious, charitable, community, or educational purposes for which the organization is sPeshall cally organized, except for reasonable operating expenses, be guilty of a Class 6 felony. THIS APPLICATION IS FOR: (check one) AINGO GAMES X RAFFLE PERMIT v Name of Organization LOYAL ORDER OF MOOSE LODGE N0. 284 ,Street Address 3233 CATAWBA VALLEY DRIVE, SALEM, VIRGINIA 24153 Mailing Address P. 0. BOX 538, City, State, Zip Code SALEM, VIRGINIA 24153 Purpose and Type of Organization ~ FRATERNAL ORGANIZATION When was the organization founded? 1915 1 L - ,,~,~ Roanoke County meeting place? Yes - Moose Home - 3233 Catawba Valley.Drive Has organization been in existence in Roanoke County for two con- tinuous years? YES X NO Is the organization non-profit? YES X NO Indicate Federal Identification Number # 54-0287492 Attach copy of IRS Tax Exemption letter. Officers of the Organization: President: Bruce M. Hensley Vice-Pre Larry M. Conner sident Address: 6707 McKinney Street Address : 4970 Bradshaw Road Roanoke, Virginia 24019 Salem, Virginia 24153 Secretary: Delnore F. Mills Treasurer: Raymond P. Nicholas c/o P. 0. Box 538 Address • 1807 Laurel Mtn. Drive Address: Salem, Virginia 24153 Salem, Virginia 24153 Member authorized to be responsible for Raffle or Bingo opera- tions: ~ ~ ~~ iS-` ~~ G~' ^~ James E. Garlick '' G~ti~ ~ '~ Name ~,~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ti ,~ 705 Hemlock Road, Salem, Va. 24153 ~~ ~ ~,/`~ ~ ~r_, `b Home Address n~~„ u Phone 343-3123 Bus . Phone 344-7363 ~'v !~ ~ ~4 A COMPLETE LZ`'T OF THE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF CURRENT MEMBER- SHIP MUST BE F'RNISfiED WITH THIS APPLICATION. ' Specific :.ocation where Raffle or Bingo Game is to be conducted. Moose Home, 3233 Catawba Valley Drive, Salem, Va. 24153 RAFFLES: Date of Drawing Time of Drawing BINGO: Days of Week & Hours of Activity: Sunday XX Monday Tuesday Wednesday XX Thursd~ly Friday Saturday From To From 7 pm To 11 pm From To From To From 7 pm To 11 pm From To From To 2 "` State specifically how the proceeds from the Bingo/Raffle will be used. List in detail the use of the planned or intended use of the proceeds. Use estimated amounts if necessary. THE PROCEEDS OF OUR BINGO OPERATION WILL BE USED FOR T~~E PURPOSE OF DONATIONS TO CIVIC ORGANIZATIONS, LOCAL, STATE AND NATIONAL AND TO MAINTAIN OUR BINGO OPERATION. ~~~ BINGO: Complete the following: Legal owner(s) of the building where BINGO is to be conducted: Name• Loyal Order of Moose Lodge No. 284 Address• P• 0. Box 538, Salem, Va. 24153 County Roanoke State Va• Zip 24153 Is the building owned by a~501-C non-profit organization? Yes •Seating capacity for each location: Parking spaces for each location: 700 700 ALL RAFFLE AND BINGO APPLICANTS MUST ANSWER QUESTIONS 1 - 19 1. Gross receipts from all sources related to the operation of Bingo games or Instant Bingo by calendar quarter for prior calen- dar year period. BINGO INSTANT BINGO 1st Quarter 67,909.42 2nd Quarter 81,687.90 3rd Quarter 98,672.10 4th Quarter 98,471.85 Total 346, 921.27 1st Quarter 21,921.91 2nd Quarter 22,475.20 3rd Quarter 21,120.01 4th Quarter 18,823.20 Total 84,340.32 2. Does your organization understand that it is a violation of law to enter into a contract with any person or firm, associa- tion, organization, partnership, or corporation of any classifica- tion whatsoever, for the purpose of organizing, managing, or con- ducting Bingo Games or Raffles? Yes 3. Does your organization understand that it must maintain and file complete records of receipts and disbursements pertaining to Bingo games and Raffles, and that such records are subject to audit by the Commissioner of the Revenue? Yes 4. Does your organization understand that the Commissioner of the Revenue or his designee has the right to go upon the premises on which any organization is conducting a Bingo game or raffle, to perform unannounced audits, and to secure for audit all re- cords required to be maintained for Bingo games or raffles? Yes 3 5. Does your organization understand that a Financial Report must be filed witti the Commissioner of the Revenue on or before the first day of November of each calendar year for which a per- mit has been issued? Yes 6. Does your organization understand that if gross receipts ex- ceed fifty thousanc- dollars during any calendar quarter, an addi- . tional Financial Report must be filed for such quarter no later than sixty day:, following the last day of such quarter? Yes 7. Does your organization understand that the failure to file financial reports when due shall cause automatic revocation of the permit, and no such organization shall conduct any Bingo game or raffle thereafter until such report is properly filed and a new permit is obtained? Yes 8. Does your organization understand that each Financial Report must be accompanied by a Certificate, verified under oath by the Board of Directors, that the proceeds of any Bingo game or raffle have been used for these lawful, religious, charitable, commu- nity, or educational purposes for which the organization is spe- cifically chartered or organized, and that the operation of Bingo games or raffles have been in'accordance with the provisions of Article 1.1 of Chapter 8, Title 18.2 of the Code of Virginia? Yes 9. Does your organization understand that a one percent audit fee of the gross receipts must be paid to the County of Roanoke .upon submission of the annual financial report due on or before the first of November? Yes 10. Does your organization understand that this permit is valid only in the County of Roanoke and only at such location~s,YaSd for such dates, as are designated in the permit application. 11. Does your organization understand that no person, except a bona fide member of any such organization who shall have been a member of such organization for at least ninety days prior to such participation, shall participate in the management, opera- tion, or conduct of any bingo game or raffle, and no person shall receive any remuneration for participating in management, operation, or conduc*_ of any such game or raffle? Yes 12. Has your organization attached a check for the annual permit fee in the .mount of $25.00 payable to the County of Roanoke, Virginia? Yes 13. Does your organization understand that any organization found in violation of the County Bingo and Raffle Ordinance or §18.2- 340.10 of the Code of Virginia authorizing this permit is subject to having such permit revoked and any person, shareholder, agent, member or employee of such organization who violates the above to having such permit revoked and any person, shareholder, agent, member or employee of such organization who violates the above referenced Codes may be guilty of a felony? Yes 4 L -- ,~ 14. Has your organization attached a complete list of its member- ship to this application form? Officers only 15. Has your organization attached a copy of its bylaws to this application form? 16. Has the organization been declared exempt from property taxa- tion under the Virginia Constitution or statutes? Yes If yes, state whether ex~mption,is for real, personal property, or both and iden+~ify exempt property. Real Estate ataw a Va ey Drive, Sa em 17. State the specific type and purpose of the organization. Fraternal- non-profit - charitable 18. Is this organization incorporated in Virginia? Yes If yes, name ar.d address of Registered Agent: Delnore F. Mills c o P. 0. Box 538 Salem, Virginia 24153 19. Is the organization registered with the Virginia Department ' of Agriculture and Consumer Affairs pursuant to the Charitable Solicitations 11ct, Section 57-48 of the Virginia Code? No (If so, attach ropy of rc~3istration.) Has the organization been granted an exemption from registration by the Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Affairs? No (If so, attach copy of exemption.) ALL RAFFLE APPLICANTS DESCRIBE THE ARTICLES TO BE RAFFLED, VALUE OF SUCH ARTICLES, AND PROCEED TO NOTARIZATION. Article Description Fair Market Value 5 ~~~ ALL BINGO APPLICANTS MUST ANSWER QUESTIONS 20 - 27 BEFORE NOTARIZATION RAFFLE APPLICANTS, GO TO NOTARIZATION. 20. Does your organization understand that the bingo games shall not be conducted more frequently than two calendar days in any calendar week? yes 21. Does your organization understand that it is required to keep complete records of the bingo game. These records based on §18.2- 340.6 of the Code of Virginia and §4.98 of Roanoke County Code must include the following: yes a. A record of the date, quantity, and card value of instant bingo supplies purchased, as well as the name and address of the supplier of such instant bingo supplies, and written invoice or receipt is also required for each purchase of in- stant bingo supplies? Yes b. A record in writing of the dates on which Bingo is played, the number oi: people in attendance on each date~eand the amount of receipts and prizes on each day? (These Yecords must be retained for three years.) c. A record of the name and address of each individual to whom a door prize, regular or special Bingo game prize or jackpot from the playing of Bingo is awarded? yes d. A complete and itemized record of all receipts and disburse- ments which support, and that agree with, the quarterly and annual reports required to be filed, and that these'rYeords must be maintained in reasonable order to permit audit. 22. Does your organization understand that instant Bingo may only be conducted at such time as regular Bingo game is in progress, and only at such locations and at such times as are specified in this application? yes 23. Does your organization understand that the gross receipts in the course of a reporting year from the playing of instant Bingo may not exceed 33 1/3$ of the gross receipts of an organization's Bingo operation? Yes 24. Does your organization understand it may not sell an instant Bingo card to an individual below sixteen years of age? Yes 25. Does your organization understand that an organization whose gross receipts from all bingo operations that exceed or are ex- pected to exceed $75,000 in any calendar year shall have been granted tax-exempt status pursuant to Section 501 C of the United States Ir ternal '=revenue Service? Yes (Certificate must be attached.) , 6 ~.. - . Does your organization undersienWhichtauthorizesCthfs use cat, 26 pancy must be obtained or b Yon fi the proposed location? rize money 27. Does your organization understand that awards ° a mo unts are or merchandise valued in excess of the following illegal? Yes rize shall exceed twenty-five dollars. a, No door p No re ular Bingo or special Bingo game shall exceed One Hund- b. g , red dollars. 'ackpot of any nature whatsoever shall eo~eedlO e awarded c . No J ackp P Dollars, nor shall the texceedmOnetThousand Dollars. in any one calendar day * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * NOTARIZATION: THE FOLLOWING APPLICANTS OATH MUST BE TAKEN BY ALL enalties of perjury as set I hereby swear or affirm under the P that all of the above inia, and forth in §18.2 of the Code of Virg knowledge, information, statements areuestions havebbeenoanswered. beliefs. All q Name / 19~ this day of Subscribed and sworn before me, / My commission expires: ~~~~ 19~ Notary Public RT;^'UR[J TH_;S COMPLETED APPLICATION TO: COMMISSIONER ,OF THE REVENUE p,O. Box 300 Roanoke, VA 24015 7 r Signed by: -~ NOT VALID UNLESS COUNTERSIGNED been found in due form, is approved The above application, having and issued to the applicant to nave effect until December 31st o this calendar year. ~ ~ (~ `~ ~~ ~ Commissi er of th Revenue Date The above application is not approved. Commissioner of the Revenue Date r 8 BOARD OF OFFICERS ROANOKE MOOSE LODGE N0. 284 1987-1988 HOME WORK 362-4047 982-3953 GOVERNOR: BRUCE M. HENSLEY LARRY M. CONNER 384-6498 JR. GOVERNOR: NORMAN PLEASANTON 366-3355 PRELATE: 774-7860 387-7198 JR. PAST GOVERNOR: EDWARD F. MULLIKIN, JR. RAYMOND P. NICHOLAS 362-5003 TREASURER: 982-3953 3 YR : ROGER D. ANDERSON 362-5372 . TRUSTEE: 2 YR.: EDWARD E. GUINN 362-4033 1 YR.: DONALD F. MULLINS 362-2185 384-7172 ADMINISTRATOR: DELNORE F. MILLS 389-5780 SGT. AT. ARMS: JOHN SALVAS 774-6240 JOHN WADE DAVID E. BLANKENSHIP 345-6100 INNER GUARD: 345-1595 THOMAS PALP'IER W 890-4718 OUTER GUARD: . . ~+~~1-sss any n~ply to: 31 Hopkins Plaza, Baltimore, Md. 21201 D~~~P~G~ DD ~PC~C~f~OP Internal Revenue Service Oste: In rePIY nf~r to: October 26, 19761 E0: 7300: E.L. Pou: Telephone.: _ _,(~~_ _g~~_ n Loyal Order of Moose #28l~ P.O. Box 1133 Roanoke, Virginia 21006 Gentlemen: This is in response to a telephone call on the above date from ~. Julian Mowles, requesting a copy of an Ex~rlption Letter for the Loyal Order of Moose # 281,rG. The recnrds ~a our office indicate the Loyal Order of Moose #284 is part of a Group Ruling. Therefore, an Exemption better will have to be obtained from your parent organization. However, the records in our office also indicate exemption from Federal In- come Tax was granted to the Loyal Order of Moose #284 in August 1935 under Section 501(c)(8) of the Internal Revenue Code. The Employler Identifica- tion Number assigned to your organization is, 511-02871.92. This ?stter may be used as an Exemption Letter. The exemption remains in effect as of this date. Sincerely yours, ~~. Gerald G. Portnoy 1 District Director i _ _.._. _. _---. -...,..,.,,.r,,..,_,~.,~.-.,_..._.,,..,_.,. -...~ ^~-ar--- ~, . , ~.-- __ _ _-_--- ~~ ,2~ A p p E A R A N C E R E Q U E S T C ~~! PUBLIC HEARING ON ~j~ ~ ~ %.:~'~;- .-~c~ << I would like the Chairman of the Board recognize me during the public hearing that I may comment. I agree to follow below. WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I of Supervisors to on the above matter so the guidelines listed WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. 1. Each speaker will have between three and five minutes available whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. 2. Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. 3. All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. 4. Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times . 5. Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. 6. INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. P L E A S E W R I T E L E G I B L Y NAME : _ ~ !~ ~ ~ ~/ '~~' ~~ ADDRESS . ~ ~ ~[~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '~ '`~ " a Y-?. t ' t / ~ ~-~ ~ .~ ~~'" ~t ~~....~~ ,.' ~ ~, ~ ,.~ ~ L, ~__ PHONE : ~ j ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ PLEASE NOTE: (After filling out, give to the Deputy Clerk. Thank you.) ITEM NUMBER .*'" ~- AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER IN ROANOKE, VA., ON TUESDAY, MEETING DATE: January 12, 1988 SUBJECT: Accounts Paid - November 1987 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Payments to Vendors: $3,521,584.81 Payroll: 11/13/87 $360,886.94 11/27/87 388,199.27 749,086.21 $4,270.671.02 A detailed listing of the payments is on file with the Clerk to the Board of Supervisors. SUBMITTED BY: ~~ ~. ~ a~ Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance APPROVED: C.i ~ /~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ------------------------------------------------------------------ ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Garrett Received ( ) Johnson Referred McGraw To Nickens Robers ITEM NUMBER '~ ... ''~~-~- AT A REGULAR MEETIN D AT THE ROANOKEFCOUNTYIADMINISTRATIOON COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HEL CENTER. MEETING DATE: January 12, 1988 SUBJECT: Medical Insurance Coverage for Period Beginning July 1, 1988 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: `~j~ ~ "- I ill SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The County renewed medical insurance coverage with Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Virginia ef1988ive In lrenewal 7of athetcurrenttBlue will expire on June 30, Cross and Blue Shield contract, the Board of Supervisors requested that County staff review alternatives for medical insurance coverage for the period beginning July 1, 1988. In the development of alternatives for coverage for next year, a medical insurance survey haven been eaPalyzed and a~ed incladedTas results of this survey Attachment A with this report. As indicated in thinionrofythose main objective was to gain insight into ~sehealth plan as to individuals participating in Roanoke County what needs to be done thealth of surancelcoverages survey reveals major concerns regarding In the evaluation of Roanoke County's plan, 5 percent rated the 44 percent rated plan excellent; 28 percent rated the plan good; the plan fair; and 22 percent rated the plan poortheUpaan are current plan, only 35 percent of those utilizing satisfied with the overall coverage. Those indiv~dma~s con tern alternate plan gave-the high premium rate as the p Y of not participating in the County's plan, and 33 percent said they would change if rates were lowered. The following data was reported in percentages of those who responded yes: -30 percent are willing to give up their freedom to choose a hospital and doctor. -21 percent would oppose the plan regardless of improvements on coverage and rates. -82 percent would like to be able to choose between a "high option" plan and a "low option" plan. -90 percent would be interested in a dallaorpaaportion of the 71 percent would be willing to pay premiums. -80 percent would be interested lallyorc arportioneof the percent would be willing to pay premiums. There was considerable interest in the survey for dental or eye care coverage, and tfeaddentaloor eyelcaregplan, for participants to incur some cost o It is recommended that a bid proposal for health care coverage be developed and that bids be solicited for health care coverage for the period beginning July 1, 1988. SUBMITTED BY: ~o~%'~~ D. K. Cook Director of Human Resources APPROVED: C~~ivuc~~0 Elmer C. Hod County Administrator ATTACHMENT A -~ Results of Medical Insurance Survey Roanoke County Human Resource Department Personnel Research Associates P.O. Box 946 Radford, VA 24141 (703) 731-0114 12/9/87 Medical Insurance Surve ~ `°' The present survey was conducted by Roanoke County's Human Resource Department and analyzed by Michael Surrette. The main objective was to gain insight into the opinion of those individuals participating in the Roanoke County's Health plan as to what needs to be done to improve the plan. Data were also collected from individuals who utilize a health plan other than Roanoke County's. The data analyzed were only on those questions which had a clear response. Missing, incomplete or minimal response data were not subjectively interpreted by the analyst; they were treated as missing information. Satisfaction with Roanoke Count Plan In evaluation of Roanoke County's plan, a series of questions were generated to gain insight into the satisfaction level of those participating in the health plan. In an overall rating 5$ rated the plan "Excellent", 28$ rated it "Good", 44$ rated it "Fair", and 22$ rated it "Poor". Under the current plan only 35$ of those utilizing the plan are satisfied with the overall coverage. While 50$ are satisfied with the claim service provided by the plan. Of those individuals admitted to the hospital during the last year 51$ claimed their Pre-Admission review was handled appropriately. Supporting data for those individuals who received poor Pre-Admission service was insufficient to be interpreted in an accurate fashion. Sixty eight percent of those who responded, reported that they had direct contact with Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Virginia. Participants (63$) who had direct contact within the last year /V reported having their inquiry responded to in a prompt, complete and courteous. Deficiencies of Roanoke County's Plan Fifty two percent of those individuals using an alternative plan gave their suggestion as to what it would take for them to join Roanoke County's plan. Since the primary concern was the high rate of the County's plan, 33$ said they would change if the rates were lower. While 20$ would consider changing if a dental plan was implemented as well as general benefits being increased. The remaining changes would be to find a more efficient way to deduct the monthly premiums and have the employer pay 100$ of the health plan (11$). From the 23$ utilizing an alternative plan, 27$ are receiving Full coverage and 60$ have a Comprehesive plan with their respective companies. Data reveal that of the 454 participants in the survey, 77$ were currently enrolled with Roanoke County's Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Virginia. From the remaining 23$ who were not enrolled with Roanoke County, 86$ were covered by their spouse's insurance, 32$ reported that the Roanoke County plan was to expensive for them to participate, 3$ had no interest in the plan at all, and 12$ gave various other reasons for not participating. Alternative Plans In review of those Health plans used, Blue Cross and Blue Shield was used by 26$ of the people, while 8$ utilize the services of the Travelers and Mail Handlers. Table 1 gives a complete break down of the alternative health plans being used by the 23$ not enrolled with Roanoke County. The participants in this survey were reluctant their premiums and other Table 2 should be inte response rate individuals health plan being used. ~/ iG.~ to give their financial data regarding requested monthly payments. Data in rpreted with caution due to the low gave regarding their payments for the The following data were reported in percentages of those who responded yes: - 30$ are willing to give up their freedom to choose a hospital and doctor. - 21$ would oppose the plan regardless of improvements on coverage and rates. - 82$ would like to be able to choose between a "High option" plan and a "Low option" plan. - 90$ would be interested in a Dental plan if offered, 71$ would be willing to pay all or a portion of the premiums. - 80$ would be interested in Eye care if offered, 63$ would be willing to pay all or a portion of the premiums. Additional Comments Individuals surveyed by Roanoke County's Human Resource Department were given the opportunity to voice their opinion via an open ended question asking for additional comments. In review of the data, four issues emerge as the source of customer dissatisfaction. First, employees are tired of receiving poor insurance coverage as a whole. The main concern revolves around the need for quality coverage, health insurance is much to important to search for the best deal available. Participants are willing to pay a little more for a quality plan which makes them feel secure. Second, the majority of responses were in regard to the claim service given by Roanoke County's BC/BS of Virginia. Primarily the claim service is to slow, and the level of aggravation resulting from its poor processing is very high. Lastly, as evident by the survey, employees are in dire need to attain dental and (or) eye coverage. The data clearly shows a willingness by the participants to incur some of the costs of a dental / eye care plan. Thus, the survey has revealed a series of major concerns regarding health insurance offered by Roanoke County and various suggestions have been offered. i 7 -~ .~.. Table 1: Alternative Health Plans Utilized Insurance Company Frequency Percent Blue Cross and Blue Shield 22 26$ Travelers ~ 8$ Mail Handlers ~ 8$ Champus 6 ~$ Prudential 4 5$ Aetna 3 4~ Group Admin. Services 3 4~ Providers 3 4~ Equitable 2 3~ Metropolitan Life 2 3~ Pilot Lif e 2 3$ .,. Table 2: Monthly Premium Payments N High Average Individual 9 83.00 43.00 Family Plan 46 268.00 96.00 Premiums ** 36 220.00 66.00 Low 24.00 12.00 12.00 Employers Payment 14 178.00 92.00 21.00 *numbers reported are in dollars **Employee Premium Payment /Y Appendix 1 1. Are you currently enrolled with Roanoke County BC/BS of Virginia? 77$ yes 23$ no la. Reasons given for not participating in the plan. 32~ To Expensive 87$ Covered under spouse 3$ Not interested 12$ Other 2. What is the name of the other health plans used? - Refer to table 1 3. Amount of monthly premiums paid to other health plans. - Refer to table 2 4. Desired changes suggested by non-members. 33~ Lower the rates 20$ Add a dental program 20$ More general benefits 11$ Employer pay 100 of the health plan 5. Type of coverage for non-members. 27$ Full coverage 60$ Comprehensive plan 6. Willing to give up freedom of choice. 30$ yes 70$ no 7. Opposed to changing to another insurance company. 21$ yes 79$ no 8. Choice between High option and Low option plans. 82$ yes 18$ no 9. Would be interested in dental and willing to pay. 90$ yes 71$ yes 10$ no 29$ no 10. Interested in eye care and willing to pay. 80$ yes 63$ yes 20$ no 37$ no 11. Overall ratings received by the County's plan. 5$ Excellent 28$ Good 44$ Fair 22$ Poor 12. Satisfied with the coverage provided. 35$ yes 65~ no 13. Satisfied with the claim service provided. 50~ yes 50~ no 14. Having their Pre-Admission review handled appropriately. 51$ yes 49$ no 15. Having direct contact with BC/BS within the last year. 68$ yes 32$ no ~~-- MEDICAL INSURANCE SURVEY WE ARE ASKING YOUR HELP IN PROVIDING INFORMATION TO ASSIST ROANOKE COUNTY TO BETTER SERVE YOUR HEALTH INSURANCE NEEDS. WE NEED THIS INFORMATION TO DECIDE WHAT CHANGES ARE NECESSARY TO CONTROL MEDICAL INSURANCE COSTS AND TO DETERMINE THE COVERAGE DESIRED BY COUNTY EMPLOYEES. 1. Are you currently participating in the Roanoke County Blue Cross of Virginia Health Plan? (Skip to question 6 if your answer to this question is yes) Yes No If your answer is no, would you please explain. Too Expensive Have health insurance coverage through spouse or other source. Not interested Other Reason: 2. If you do not have health insurance through the Roanoke County plan, with whom are you insured? 3. If you do not currently have health insurance through the Roanoke County plan, what is the amount of monthly premium you are paying (whether paid by you, other employer, or other source)? Individual $ per month Subscriber/One Minor $ per month Family Plan $ per month Number of Dependents What amount of premium do you pay? per month. What amount does other employer pay if covered under spouse's plan? per month 1 ~ `if °- 4. What changes in the Roanoke County Plan are needed to encourage you to transfer to the County's Plan? 5. If your health insurance is not with Roanoke County, what type coverage do you have? Full coverage where 100X of health care expenses are paid? Yes No Comprehensive Plan where insured pays a portion of health care expenses (i.e. deductible or percentage of cost)? Yes No Other Coverage 6. Would you be willing to give up freedom of choice and use one hospital or one group of doctors for basic medical care, if this would keep premiums down or reduce them? Yes No 7. Would you be opposed to changing to another insurance company if coverage could be improved and/or the cost reduced? Yes No If Yes, would you explain? 8. Would you be interested in having a choice between a "high option" plan (plan that pays higher benefits with higher premiums similar to a full coverage plan) and a "low option" plan (plan that pays lower benefits with lower premiums similar to our present comprehensive plan)? Yes No 2 ,° ,.~... 9. If a dental plan was offered, would you be interested in partici- pat ing? Yes No Would you consider paying a portion or all of the premium costs? Yes No 10. If an eye care plan was offered, would you be interested in partici- pating? Yes No Would you consider paying a portion or all of the premium costs? Ye s No 11. If currently enrolled or enrolled within the last two years in the Roanoke County Plan, how would you rate the overall service provided to you and County employees by Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Virginia? Excellent Good Fair Poor 12. Are you satisfied with the coverage provided by Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Virginia under the current Roanoke County Health Plan? Yes No 13. Are you satisfied with the claim service provided by Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Virginia? Yes No 14. If you have been admitted to the hospital during the last year, was Pre-Admission Review handled appropriately? Yes No If the answer is No, please explain: 3 N-- ;~. 15. In the past year have you had any direct contact with Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Virginia through telephone call to customer service department or through service representatives)? Yes_ No 16. If you had direct contthe restonseuto yoursinquirylwasSprompt?n the past year, did you feel P Complete? Courteous? 17. Do you have any additional comments or suggestions regarding health and medical coverage for County employees and dependents? PLEASE COMPLETE ~ RESOURCES BYSOC OBER 30,T1987EP~TMENT OF HUMAN 10-6-87 4 ITEM NUMBER ~~- AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER IN ROANOKE, VA., ON TUESDAY, JANUARY 12, 1988 MEETING DATE: January 12, 1988 SUBJECT: Water and Sewer Bill Relief for Water Consumption for Flood Cleanup COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: At the December 10, 1985 meeting of the Board of Supervisors, the Board authorized the establishment of a policy providing relief on the water and sewer bills for flood victims who had used water for cleanup purposes. The effect of this policy is to allow a credit for water and sewer usage that is in excess of 150% of normal usage. The credits were to be allowed only to those customers that were victims of the flood. It was further authorized that the credits would be given only by request of the citizen and upon adequate proof that the customer was within the flood area. It is the opinion of the Department of Finance and Department of Utilities that this policy is still effective and that credits can be applied to customers of our water and sewer system through appropriate application. Should you have constituents within your respective areas who would be impacted by this policy, please have them contact Mr. Wayne Williams, Utility Billing Supervisor, at 772-2024 for assistance. FISCAL IMPACT: RECOMMENDATION: SUBMITTED BY: ~,.~ ~ ~ , ohn M. Chambli Jr. Assistant County Administrator APPROVED: ~~" Elmer C. Hodge 'County Administrator ------------------------------------------------------------------ ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Robers Received ( ) Garrett Referred Johnson To McGraw Nickens ITEM NUMBER i`~~`~ -` AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER IN ROANOKE, VA., ON TUESDAY, MEETING DATE: January 12, 1988 SUBJECT: Accounts Paid - December 1987 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Payments to Vendors: $2,759,803.62 Payroll: 12/11/87 $352,630.96 12/24/87 361,908.45 714,539.41 $3,474,343.03 A detailed listing of the payments is on file with the Clerk to the Board of Supervisors. SUBMITTED BY: ~.I'Ymo ~ iV i~T Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance APPROVED: ~~ V'- Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ------------------------------------------ ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred To Garrett Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: January 12, 1988 Si1B,7ECT: Work Session on Secondary Highway Six-Year Plan COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: As the Board may recall, on December 15, 1987, a public hearing was held to receive citizen comment concerning the Secondary Highway Six-Year Plan . At that time, the Board requested a final work session to discuss this issue. Staff has reviewed the previous requests and the citizen comments from the public hearing and are in the process of finalizing revisions to the plan. This time has been set aside to discuss these revisions. Elmer C. Ho e County Administrator -------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abp Denied ( ) Garrett Received ( ) Johnson Referred McGraw Nickens To Robers .~, AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JANUARY 12, 1988 RESOLUTION NO. 11288-10 APPROVING PRIORITIES FOR THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY HIGHWAY SIX YEAR CONSTRUCTION PLAN FOR ROANOKE COUNTY FOR FISCAL YEAR 1988-89 BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. The Board does hereby establish for fiscal year 1988-89 those certain construction fund priorities for the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary Highway Six Year Construction Plan in Roanoke County as set out on that certain list of priorities as amended by the Board at its meeting on January 12, 1988; and 2. That a public hearing was held on December 15, 1987, to receive comments on the Secondary Highway Six Year Construction Plan for the period of 1988-94; and 3. That a copy of this resolution duly attested be forthwith forwarded to the Virginia Department of Transportation Salem Residency office along with a duly attested copy of said priority list of projects on the Secondary Highway Six Year Construction Plan by the Clerk to the Board. On motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by Supervisor McGraw, and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None A COPY - TESTE: y~ ~=[~~ Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk 1/13/88 Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: Files Phillip Henry, Director of Engineering John Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator Va. Department of Transportation _~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JANUARY 12, 1988 RESOLUTION NO. 11287-9 APPROVING THE SECONDARY HIGHWAY SIX YEAR CONSTRUCTION PLAN FOR ROANOKE COUNTY FOR THE PERIOD OF 1988-94 BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. The Board does hereby approve the Secondary Highway Six Year Construction Plan as set out on the attached summary and as amended by the Board on January 12, 1988; and 2. That a public hearing was held on December 15, 1987, to receive comments on the Secondary Highway Six Year Construction Plan for the period of 1988-94; and 3. That a copy of this resolution duly attested be forthwith forwarded to the Virginia Department of Transportation Salem Residency office along with a duly attested copy of the Secondary Highway Six Year Construction Plan by the Clerk to the Board. On motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by Supervisor McGraw, and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None A COPY - TESTE: J~v~ Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors 1/13/88 cc: File Phillip Henry, Director of Engineering John Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator Va. Department of Transportation ITEM NUMBER "~ / AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF RO COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRA ANOKE TION CENTER MEETING DATE: January 12, 1988 SUBJECT: Approval of proposed Secondar Construction Plan for the Y Highway Six Year and establish Period 1988 - 1994 FY 1988 priorities of projects for - 1989 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION; Under Section 33.1-70.01 of Supervisors are required to revise thetSe o dary Hi hw Construction Plan ever local Boards of Highway Six Year Construction2Planawas a The 1986- 1992ySecondary Supervisors in the Spring of 1986, PArOVed b Board of Supervisors conducted a y the Board of On December 15, 1987 the plan and received input from stafflic hearing on the Transportation and several the Vir inia proposed requests. citizen g Department of Since the groups concerning specific previous request plus information received at the and has revised the Six Year Plan tog' staff has reviewed the the most g address whaPubs lfelte tolbe pressin needs. As noted durin of the main concerns in g the significant cost increase of eparing the public hearing, one previously a roposed plan has been a to these cost increase, staff has reviewed the Pproved projects. Due were previously approved for the given consideration to the additional98equest 92 projects which plan as well as During the public hearin 688, and Timberview Road g. requests for Cotton Hill Road, Route While these requests were~consideredOdurin re made b priorit Y citizens. y of these projects was conside redh to taff review, the streets included in the be lower than construction could include some Fundin minor g for incidental improvements during the next several draina e will be kept on file and reconsidered in g and roadway years. These road requests scheduled update of the Secondar 1990 durin Plan. y Highway Six Year Construction The following is a summary of the recommended changes from the preliminary Secondary Highway Six Year Construction Plan for 1988 - 1994 as presented during the public hearing; A. Incidental construction; no change in projected funding. B. Plant mix; no change in the year or the projected fundingroposed projects for the coming C. Unpaved roads; after further review one of the two roads to be reconstructed under this category, Cox Hopkins Road, Rt. 915, has been deleted due to the roadway not meeting the minimum traffic requirements. D. Numbered projects; the following projects which were in the 1986 - 1992 plan are recommended to be removed from the 1988 - 1994 plan. 1. Florist Road, Rt. 623, which was and reconstruction from Rt. 11 topRtpo1867fhasrbeenation deleted. In discussions with VDOT staff, it was considered that the project could best be built as of the reconstruction of Williamson Road, Rt. 11, asaat primary project to assure that the reconstruction will match with proposed improvements along Williamson Road. 2. Thirlane Road, Rt. 626, which was proposed fo.r reconstruction from Peters Creek Road to Routes 628 has been deleted. This deletion was felt to be of less importance than some of the proposed projects to be included as additions to the 1988 - 1994 plan. The following projects are being included as additions to the plan: 1. Dawnwood Road, Route 691; this projects is an upgrade of an existing gravel state maintained roadway at an estimated cost of $125,000. 2. Glade Creek Road, Route 636, includes reconstruction from Route 703 to the Botetourt C. L, at an estimated cost of $620,000. 3. Lost Mountain Road, Route 670, includes replacement of a low water bridge adjacent to Twelve 0' Route 694, at an estimated cost of $90,OOOck Knob Road, 4. Colonial Avenue, Route 720, involves reconstruction the roadway to improve sight distance in the vicinityfof Penn Forest Blvd, at an estimated cost of $50,000. 2 5. Burnt Quarter Drive, Route 1083, involves drainage improvements at an estimated cost of $80,000 and is included as an Incidental Construction item. 6. Olsen Road, Route 768, involves reconstruction of the roadway from Barrens Road, Route 1832, to I-81 at an estimated cost of $500,000. 7. Cove Road, Route 780, includes drainage improvements in the vicinity of Glen Cove School at an estimated cost of $100,000. 8. Bunker Hill Drive, Route 1602, involves reconstruction from Brambleton Avenue to the Roanoke County Administration Building at an estimated cost of $125,000. 9. Cresthill Drive, Route 1658, includes drainage improvements at Mud Lick Creek at an estimated cost of $132,000. 10. Sanderson Drive, Route 605, continuation of state project in Botetourt County to Shadwell Drive, Rt. 627, at an estimated cost of $107,000. 11. Webb Road, Route 615, widening and surface treatment of 0.35 miles eastward from Route 220 at an estimated cost of $60,000. Unpaved road category. The following projects could not be added to the plan due to financial limitations. 1. Ridge Drive, Rt. 883, which included realignment of a curve at a projected cost of $20,000. 2. Penguin Drive, Rt. 1752, which included drainage improvements at an estimated cost of $20,000. This project can hopefully be handled under the incidental construction funding for minor drainage improvements. 3. Riverside Drive, Rt. 639, reconstruction of Riverside Drive to provide a better access to the proposed Green Hill Park Equestrian Center. 4. Dry Hollow Road, Rt. 649, proposed re Rt. 639 to the proposed Spring Hollow estimated cost of $300,000. It would provide partial funding for Riverside Hollow Road using Park Access funding these projects are park related. construction from Reservoir at an be possible to Drive and Dry since both of 3 5. Olsen Road, Rt. 768, and Alpine Road, Route 1832, the proposed construction of this phase of Olsen Road should be delayed until the final alignment is established. Projected cost of the proposed construction is $620,000. 6. Verndale Drive, Rt. 1867, this project was not included since it was felt that the bridge replacement should be coordinated with a Corps of Engineers plan. If the County wishes to proceed with a flood control project on Carvins Creek, then the bridge could be considered in 1990. To provide for continuity in the review of the proposed Secondary Highway Six Year Construction Plan for 1988 - 1994, staff has enclosed maps of all of the projects that were considered in the preliminary plan prepared for the public hearing and have noted on the location maps those projects which are now being recommended to be changed in the plan. FISCAL IMPACT: All funding for the Secondary Highway Construction Program originates from State and Federal sources. RECOMMENDATION: The staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors approve resolutions authorizing the Six Year Construction Plan for the period of 1988 - 1994 and establish priorities of projects for F.Y. 1988 - 1989. SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED: zap Phillip Henry Elmer C. Hodge Director of Engineering County Administrator Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred To Motion by: ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs Brittle Garrett Johnson McGraw Nickens JANUARY 12, 1988 LIST OF MAPS PAGES D-1 thru D-45 PAGE N0. D-l. Artrip Lane, Route 793. (Under Construction) D-2. Lost Mountain Road, Route 670. D-3. Ridge Drive, Route 883. (Deleted) D-4. Penquin Drive, Route 1752. (Deleted) D-5. Colonial Avenue, Route 720. (Incidental Construction) D-6. Colonial Avenue, Route 720. D-7. Kingsmen Road, Route 608. (Construction Completed) D-8. Boones Chapel Road, Route 614. D-9. Webb Road, Route 615. D-10. Willow Branch Road, Route 677. D-11. Dawnwood Road, Route 691. D-12. Cox-Hopkins Road, Route 915. (Deleted) D-13. Old Hollins Road, Route 601. D-14. Merriman Road, Route 613. D-15. Starlight Lane, Route 615. D-16. Bradshaw Road, Route 622. D-17. Florist Road, Route 623. (Deleted) D-18. Thirlane Road, Route 626. (Deleted) D-19. Woodhaven Road, Route 628. D-20. Woodhaven Road, Route 628. D-21. Benois Road, Route 633. D-22. Glade Creek Road, Route 636. D-23. Riverland Road, Route 639. D-24. Riverside Drive, Route 639. (Deleted) D-25. Dry Hollow Road, Route 649. (Deleted) D-26. Winter Drive, Route 657. D-27. Bandy Road, Route 666. D-28. Sanderson Drive, Route 605. (Added) D-29. Yellow Mountain Road, Route 668. D-30. Roselawn Road, Route 689. (Completed) D-31. Colonial Avenue, Route 720. (Completed) D-32. Old Mill Road, Route 752. D-33. Janee Drive, Route 765. D-34. Olsen Road, Route 768. D-35. Cove Road, Route 780. D-36. Ogden Road, Route 867. D-37. Crystal Creek Road, Route 897. D-38. Crystal Creek Road, Route 897. D-39. Starkey Road, Route 904. D-40. Burnt Quarter Drive, Route 1083. D-41. Cresthill Drive, Route 1658. D-42. Olsen Road, Route 768. (Deleted) D-43. Barrens Road, Route 1832. D-44. Verndale Drive, Route 1867. (Deleted) D-45. Bunker Hill Drive, Route 1602. D-46. Hickory Orchard, Route 612 qt T7~ ! X51 is q ~;eac ra,24~~;22' ~~ ~ _~ ~. 152 ~ ~ Cc ~"-'roocn i:t;, ~ 1 ~. 35 :\ 36 U ~ ~ ~ ~. ~I O C N `. I. AC iC) j . N D~ -~, S 85-c IG 26 ~ \• ~ 38 ~ ~ I \ ~ •~~~ ~ 15 69AC1oI~~ ~ ~ 1 5a V ~ ~aac ~• ~ '565 AC ~~09AC ~ ./ .~ At ~~ ~~' ~~~ ~~ i • .~ ~ 39 ~~ ~ ~ 1 13 ~ ~ ~ 27 ~ ~ 156 °c~ 'V ~ '~ ~ ;~ ~ ~ a;A; ~ 5824Np !~ . ~ 7 ~6ANC1;/ 29 Ir~ACj ~ ~ v ~ I i. I ~ ~ AC /'• 41 ~ . 1 ~ ~ ~ LJ9Ar/ ~ j~ I / ~' 42 •• 41 ~• ~ 30 ~ ~ V ._/ ~1 IOAc / ~ ~ -~~ ~ _' szac ~~ ~ / ~ 43 m 29 / y 1 39 38': 37 :!' 36 r 32 J ' ,.. ~~ 18 < 4 ~ :5 HIII •r 35 ~° ~3 "c ~ 28 ~ r~ `cow. ~ / •~ .t :~ 45r ~ r ~ . ~~.. m 27 ~ ,~ ~ 16 47 ~ ~ ~ v v ~ 7 % ~ ,; i _ C . ~ s ~~. ~ .,26< ~25 H + i ~ o I 23 tl,.y moo. . 50 51 .24/ g . ,-. . 52 53 .. ~ F °~' -. s i Y '~~ O ..-~ ~ ~. . 14 J . ~ r~\C ' V~ ~ ~ '~ ~ 13 4 '~55': I I ~ r '~~ .o ~ ~ ~ l 12 a 56 - 7 ; O. -•. 5,- - 57 J , .+.. ~ ' ~74 . 58 . ~ / e 59 . 73 ,. ' w 71 z ~ 61 ~ ~~`o / ~• ~ ~ I 63 ~~ ~ / z 6 76/ r t 64 9 77 ~ . / I za ~' 78 / O, ~~ ~ ~ / `~ • 79 67 ;' 973?4c ~/ ;. \./ ~ ~ b- 13 . v~C/_ ~~ % ~ 80 " 91 ~ ° ~ I I ~ _, ~ : ~ ~ 82 ~ ~ ~ ~~. 83 \~,~ as •• x ~1!~! ' ~/ / `~ / pl DEPARTMENT OF Artrip Lane, Route 793 PUBLIC FACILITIES D-1 r ~, . ~ HILLS ~ \C1y ~--~ _ j . _O~~ -- - - i `,,, }~ \ , VICINITY MAP \'..~~ p~ N NORTH I '1 A- ~~ __ 1L 38 \~ \\`~ ~ " a i ~~ ~. ' ~ . DEPARTMENT OF Lost 1~(ountain Road, Route 670 ,. ('UDLIC FACILITIES D-2 ~~ \ \ . _~ \ / • / - 31 ` 31 ?_ ,~, i •.~ 72 3_ ~.. 34 ` ( 2 Voce \ av AO / .: -- / C i '- ~ ~ 1 58Ac 33 n ~ + ~ 34 214 Ac ~ / 35 I TS Ac r 31 I / \ ~ 622 w~ ~~~' a3AC . / 22 5 / d' _ 23 1.98 Ac ww: i/ 39 / 200 Ac (Dl 4 - 38 / 2 20 A c lC1 y 6 '~ 15.60 Ac 5.22 Ac 36 / ~ +°° t 21 199 AdDI 4 4 "°° 222AcIC1 1.90AdD) 24 20 1.62 Ac(G I OOAC I.01 Ac 7 / 25 i9 8 • 37 45 ~ t.00Ac 6 ~ Ipanc 1.24Ac l: • ?/ :~ ~ N w : a 43 26 18 ~ ~ a ~`~ I o I OOAdD) I OOAC f ° 106Ac _ 40 / 83Rd • 42 41 179 Ac 27 e c 17 ,,, q l 47 46 4m ?447_43'_ 146Ac / / ~ ` LOOAc _ 100 Ac OSAc~ ip ~ / 2 LI 'o . '~ / ~' C'22 3 2 IBAc I Ac 42 28 16 `- ~ ~~ ~_ 120Ac(DI ~~~ 2OOAC 1.09Ac ~° .~ 099AClCl 2. AcCI 15 _ .. ~ ~ ' S LOOAc / ~ r 167Ac / 56 55 1 S 51 ~ 2 1` 279 Ac ~ r p ~ 40 ~ O \ ' L67AC nc(D1 l • x // 32 1c 1C) J 53 49 II ~ 39 a02Ac 29 57 54 4.60Ac ~ ~ ~ F 12 •~ a 166 Ac (Dl ..e .. ;~ D • 575AC 324 AClDl - .,~ 8 ~r 38 ~ ~ 08Ac(CI r47 13 • i ,'1 150AC{DI 130Ac(CI 2.03 Ac 'b / t ~ ,.+ ., 14 d IOOAC 3 b as ~ .b. i0 ~ O .+ ~ ~' ,45' ODAC(DI IS ` / 2.0 Ac / 1 ~ t ~ 90AC / '6AC ` ' 43 44 a (CI 16 42 ~ 100Ac(Ol ~ ~ ; • 41 p p.. ¢ y 69AC/ a, 40 ~. R C ' r• t' ~ 1 s T ,t 22 21 B : Via .w ~ ~ ,•• A., m• ~pk \ $$d 3t e ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 2'~" ~ t +r ~' ~ +~ " ~ i 24 s ~ P rM •~ ~ ~. • ~ 25 a r, .~ 27 ~ to ~ v / / / u DELETED ~ /, / / 10 SOa 14 60 A DEPARTMENT OF Ridge Road, Route 883 PUBLIC FACILITIES D-3 ~, . g'~:cv 8~~ °"'° 419 ~~~ ! et ~ \H8HT5r(o `~t~.yt 9~ d°, Jf.SE~w[. 4`\~ 80 ,• ~iq. ~___C102~~ "'EtiIN ~i [ 1 .FTa F a~ 4 ~'. ~ ~~ •V; ~i ~~r ~8 S ~`e''b- __ cr t ~fF ~r \`{_~ ~2Tr ~, `.~ C t'~ C ~ a„~ T~e ~ I TON LAKE '9[ / ~tw~,~,~ y,, fi S ~ ~. o, a ~ aa2 CASTIy~ROCK FM9_~ _. F~Q~'F,ow~ ~ _ ~ CRE$TN'~ PMK~/ y~~' Av Ttye ~p E ~ ° ., ~qo': GREC72r "`gODOw iNGTON, y• C,Gy ~~ 1 R~~ cb J C d E~NTwIq DP YY ~~o j }tJf7R1NG HAMcwr sverNe Q,[M'E SiR~NG Fq ~~qD Sav."G"j / l~a.,~ ~\ ss pN° ~ 'Q}"~ ~ ~~`'- HGTS ((~~ ~ - ~7 L/ '+n~<. ~ aCW c QT .r / 1 ..,~d;f ff tr o~- w[ 14. ^f t~'~~ -.' f j.- y w ,. s, ~ 'oo . Y.~ ~ ~Jd..9~ Mc. i!E'"s_,.F® 1667 '/ EYON HILL ~~~ 419 ~ `ffi 'Wsf~. ~___,{{ Eq=TEN g9~. rlg .a„w~ 1 I ~ O~ ~ ~i' ~A", y~fn~I ~- ~~' ~ ~' m~w• I u~\p 7[U 0 G[FNrnONT Vt.-__ t . , % I .. ~ 1 ~1 ~ s o ~ .,c` GLC1~9a.S2P4L+.4::"'..n"w. r.r PEN'_"-~'~ReT7 ~ Y ~"~f~ E~ rwsw.[ ~y~~7~ / F ~7=,, .p~v J ~ ~~~ i 154/®~ N'-:eE`(e r.u_ D~Dra,.~~~.--"~ `~ RK~~ ``I so,'°"T,,,~'`~ta+ 4 CAD ~ 2QI ~ ~E ,v2 4P~i~~.`1Pi ~4Y 4 4~ ~ !~.KE~: fONTFf}AtIR1'i.. V I C I N I 'I'Y MAP 4 _ ~._ `: 11 azk ~Rt. 419 ~ _ /~ ~ H\O\ _ r le 12 .., • w _ IS / 1 .~ GMa.y I` • ~ x, ,2 13 ? ~y .4 e ~• . M t2 43 k ~ T ~ ' Il ; • JS ~' - 16 SI E uarq Gm Scgmt 1] u r O:K / - , q • b ~ r ' , ~ ` ~ 31 + 7 e 32 ' • 4 ~ S • '! r .•'.. ~ 6 a ' O ~ caoglol / S • / 7 I 2 6 / f! S I I 0 ~ti ~ I VV / O 9 „ / 12gc S I 2 I/ - t / r~o eTOSt-z I- • tod ' .- I q / / .' / K '~ '' ~~ INCIDENTAL n~ . ~ . q ' CONST. NORTEi ~~ 4, 2 i B9 q< DEP1~[ZTMENT Or Colonial Avenue, Route 720 "~ ~ I'U[3LIC Fl1CILITIES D-5 ,Q~'~ ~ / zn , Q j ( v ~- - ~. . )2 .. ' I S \ 'c N ~ S64 O ' ` ' 23 SI ~• ~ \' ~ 30 • ~ \ ' b \'. 26 ~ ~ . 6 R i 29• \ ~ o-..rc ..,n ~ ~ .q ~ \~ t~ - \` \,~ \ \ \ ~• / ~ ~ , \ a \ \ \ ../ 1.2 V9i a~ ` \ v ' \ 3i .\~ \ • „ I.I + •5~ \ \ \\ ~\ \ i_ 5, q+. • C~O+. S.gaN vio nte•s-s I., ~. .p.n f.a.. Sr.VS. 206 q< 'r- 13 I I i ~= 12 ''I I a /;: % it i , ~~_.~ I ^I ii~6~ 5 .' 16 I a~q~ '~ 10 6-SA C IM1 2 I a: 1~ 61 __ i~M1~ ,e x v II I 12 ~ 13 r~ la ~~ 9w Z i _~ J Belt A4eade Dr ~~ /~, ~. // \ L / / s ~~ P~ e ono / i G 13B Ac / / / / -~2 . , ~R~ _ / ~ '' \ 4 I / \ 104Ac \ ~~~ / \ / / _ q~ /~ f 3 ~Ob 4c 0 2 ~\ P: e l 's ` •z 4.89 a 16 so o 3 18 ~ a 17 V ~~ o h~ ~v i i C• wae, ~ 15 ~ ` a v ~~ ~ / 11,• Y. .j 6 ~s ` 14 ~s / e M66 r b?~~ 9~ ~• P3 P SIX' ~C~'l~ ' \ J v~ ]6 R DEPARTMENT OF Colonial Avenue, Route 720 1~ PUBLIC FACILITIES D-6 I C C ~71j, I o`~Jy I 13 Ij ~ I oo'n~ca ~0ari+o~r ca~.rr J Iz ,~~ II I.o3 a< 2.00 Ac. b IS M z 1 03At 9 16 See Mop 40.10 i o.3 ~ • I "=100' 8 ' 2.2SAc ~~ 7 5 S.OB ik.(01 3.66 AcIC) 'Q~ y, `' Y • CONSTRUCTI J~ 17 24.46 Ac NORTH Qom. ~ P TE D M ~6~,000 DEPARTMENT OF Kingsmen Road, Route 608 PUBLIC FACILITIES D-7 DEPARTMENT OE PUBLIC F1ICILITIES Webb Road, Route 615 D-9 ~`Jat ~ ~A i 0 ~j Sd a~ ~. ~z ~~a~.oi~. ~._~ j c, `~ ~, / r D-10 ~~ PUBLICMFACIOLITIESILLOW BRANCH ROAD 677 DEPARTMENT OE l~ Dawnwood Road, Route 691 PUF3LIC F1ICILII'IFS D-11 ~o I I I C~~O~D~OO 6~) I6 HAYSTACK MT ~ I .~ / 1 c 652 SO 66' ` 66z ~jSf J, O~ 9~5 ~~ _ _ _. _.. __ ~ ~ oiz ° r.s S/, ~-890 669 F .VICINITY MAP 6°6 ~ NORTH D E L~~E T E D ~ / ~I~ ~ , , o~:A~ , , ~~~ ,,~ ~ e IeyA: ~ ~, 1 ~ zSdAC,c1 ~ ~~ya<<c ~~ ~ .,.,_ ,~ ~ ~.~~ 9 I ~/ ~ -~ \ \ 2 53 AClCl ,I 3.1 / I ;~.,AC / ~- _ \ 12 19 AC / 1\~ ~~ 19 3 \ ~ /~ a 18 Ac lDl 163Ac~ _ ~ l 597 Ac lCi 10 ~ / 16 \\.\\\ % I I ..~ 177AC ~ \ ,, 25 ac IDI / 660 A:IC1 20 t2;~ 12 ~~~~ • ~~~ ~ ~/ ~ .'6a. rte..,,, . 3 ~ ~ .' ~1 / \ ~ .-.. IozA lol ~ o ~ea~lla - 4 1~ 5 ,, 22iac 1I I 501 Ac ,.~~. s..... a~ / I ~, 125 Ac 10) 984c IC II lo' 6, ..,I 195 Ac ' 9 I r 17 ' 18 I ~~ X19. ~ 16 X27_ O 4.30AC I.IDAc ` ,~ a, N 272 ~ ~ ~ 21 I 4 32AC (pl 2.59Ac 92 4cICl e ~ ~., I 2 01 Ac 201 Ac ~ ~ •• I ~ 25 ~ I OOAc ~KD ~~ DEPARTMENT OF Cox-Hopkins Road, Route 915 F'UE3LZC FACILITIES D-12 ~,.,I r • ~, ~- " _ t:, f off. :~' _ ~,. -.Fti ->"-~ ~`~ , x ~ '~1 VICINITY MAP ~~~~,_~~ - / 1 ~/ /~ - ~. ~ NORTH ~% y ~eO9 ~ 8 '/~~•9)5 ~ ~9p~ ~~ ~S1p ~ C~? o~ I C1 8-~n, :19~,~ ~~ ~ g , p ~ " ~ ,. o °' ,~ o p , a ate/ ~' ~/ hQ' o. ~!~ M 191po p'~ p,i ~gi6o' 1835 ~l~ - ~ ~, ~/ 1 e0Z ~ ~ 1, 8i6 ` ~ ~ ~9 i 51 1 o`' \ nes `e~5 °`: 1 •~ 196 ~ ~ ~ 1916 ~ ~ l ~ ~.,_ ~ r 18 835 1895+--~~96~ ~ 4 189 - -- - - t , ~ ~ p. o ~ ,y ~ '83~ ~ ~ 9d8~ .. 19'3 CSC 3o g ~ _ ~ 1ig °y 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ 189 C~j 19.3 ~ e :1Qn~ d. d' ~~ i9~ 3~ ""y -r ~ ~ X92 ti p!: 4 ~ '~. ~ `. 21 0 ~1853/~ o.ip ~ I 1902 pit ~ ~90~ E 0 ?, ~8 o'a• ~' o \~ - 187 _ ~ez• 1953 ~ o o - _ J °~ p- V o o G 7 ~ 18 ~ ~ .. 1 gEa d' ~ ~ 0 9 0 1, ~~ ~ \ 18 K~ C2) 18 i p1~ 186 0 0 0 0 ~ 02) c~ r • R os o• /~. 623 ~ '195 • s ob 9.1~ 91 I ~ u v - m o I 1 1912 0, ~ 18731 ~ ~ 0 89 ° oc1 Os a m ' p ~Q. 6~E / E,OS, h -C/ /_` G r---"~~ p /- ,~ ,? . P ~ + ~'' oar Np1~ONP~ ~ e,N ~ ~ ~ ~. ~r~~ ~ MPSON o ~ + ~ OVN~ :~ j ~~. Ian ! i a jr - ~~^ ~ 0 9~7 'rI ~ ! r t, 8 f ~~ ^~~SON ~ rt~~ ~ -_O" o ~ ~ ~ % ~ ~~.{ Ell y.. F,ee5~vlr~. •. /// 1 _ F .~ ~ Y~ ...I OV+{. / 4 MM I p~ Blf 656' i ~ IW ~~ NC NIOGf S i ~'- _ --(_- ~ +IOGE P ~L/ .s d ~ 1 1 .t/``ONE ~~~ ~~~~~~~t~ ~ _ -~ \ ~ ; ~ SpNOS ~ r •~~~~~ r ~ 1 1 J Cp`pWOp ~Hovens / 1 S ok / n ~ 1 I .~~~ VICINITY MAP> , --_l 1V !~~-~-; DEPARTMENT OF Florist Road, Route 623 PUBLIC FACILITIES D-17 ~'~ ~(/ / 1 ~ F76i ...fir:,. i~~ ~h ' .: w ~ ~~',. ~ ~ N''1 ~ ~~ ~~9 ~ ' ~ %i ~5° •B )' e ~~ ~~r~ - ~. i~.y SB.. • 629 \\~~., ~~ ~~ .~'1 ~~ is ~ ~, C~'~A1510~`~~0) 1/I ~' O O` VY~~S' v ~ ~r~ ~ ,, bd n ~ ~~~~~~ c~ 9• ~- ~~ / IQ~ ~i55r - o ti '~5~ VICINITY MAPS D E L~~E T E D )ioo C p'0~ ~ ~ /~j ` "` Thirlane Road, Route 626 PUF3LIC F1ICZLITIES D-18 Q- NORTH ~EE~ ~ ~-07i ,6?6 ~ ~. i °: e,~ ewe: ~ i ~,. JS' ~i a :S2• /' ~ _ ~ ~a~~ • ~'l ,w sere . o •~ i'~ ~ ,~~ --.~c.1 vICINITY MAP `\`~ey ~ ~ ~~..~ oa ~., ~e.~ ~ _ ~ 9 Qa ~ezei Ty` ~i /, ~-, ~, ~~, i ~jl -Q- NORTH ~- /~ `~ .~ ~ \'e Y -_ M76 0 ti 111., / `r / / __/_.____-_-._ o E.~ • 2i 4 ~ _ i ~ _ o' 6rs pl '626 ~ Iw c /~ D~ IS MIi ~! ~ ^ B :,) O y •~ s ~o '~~. ,t ~ X520 ~ .. . o. ,ee~ . , ~' ~ II c' /6re `~" z2 ! _~ ! ~ ~_ 676 ~i,r ~1 c,1 V/ICINITY MAP ••" %/ DEPARTMENT OF PUf3LZC F1ICILITIESWOODHAVEN ROAD, ROUTE 628 D-2 0 1 / ~~_ ~_~e• noo ~~ I 1 O , OH___ J° _ ~ v ~ O o ~~ ~~ .~ ~ f~, 'r ~ ~~ VICINITY MAP 56 JS 62 Ac(DI ar J6 Ac fC) \\\ ~. 12 j \ l 9 / / 2 oo4c %' ~ L 2B J34c ~~ / ~ / 13 ' ~ j 3 3ff 4c i i ( ~~, / 10 ~ ~ ~ / ~ ~353ac ~ ~ I ~ I i I / ~ II ~ % ~3534c /~ ~ ~ / I( ~,\ / ,. /~ ~~ i ~ 15 ,' is ap~c .\ ,.\ ~ l~ 0 ~'~ / \ ~\f/ \ j \~ \~ O + ~ ~ \~i i AN50~' f.`~~`S7 \~ //~~ u~~wt~~D ~~' , ~o.,~o.r,. ~, 'i\ _- -\_V --- v r- l ~ ~ bw ~~~ '~~~ ~= Fro! ~^ ., r) -/~ B~ o "''1 ~ ~~<, x. ~1 .,~,,, °; bra r n,,., 6,~ o• ~ IONG / \ ~-, RiDGE~ m 679 ~ / ~ i ~ (6.9 .y~~ ti ~/ _ / O\5 ~ _,~~ \ ~ ~ ~R2 X691 ~ ~ ~~ ~I) VICINITY MnP-,.~ 6ro 7~ ~~~ NORTH D E Lr~E T E D ~ i641C1 _ a `-64101 --~-_. -~ f. ~ _- . 15 16 a ooa~ 17 54/~ 13 ~ ~~~ 67 ( `~ ~~ ~~ \~' ,~ - ; aaacl^I 2 1 zx41o1~~. 4 65 ac ICI 1(104 296 a<IC~ 3 950 3 ! '~,~ I \ •!cklo~ 6 ~ r g ~L I I /(/ g ;-~~-c 101 ter... ~.C, a s.n~•,~4c1U ~j 6 ` N, 9 I / / . ~~~ ~- / 5 ~Oac r,c. y' a 06~c / , 91. SA / 4(~ . 1J JS,. 833.Ipl l -. ~I wlnr=er urive, Route 657 I'U[3LIC F1ICILI'I'IES n_~ ti ~~ NORTH DEPARTMENT OF Sanderson Drive, Route 605 PUBLIC FACILITIES D-2 d a V~ pW. ~ "i .• ~_ '~ Site 1 .w ,+ ^I . ~ ' O~~ I _ ' ~_ . __ ._\~~e -_- __- ~ o.o t ~ \ ~~ /',O /' ~' (~ ~lll D T La r mfi ~ '~. 'Mi ~ . ~ r rc ~ rye ~ i 3;• ~ r V /~`~ ~' t ~ri w. a ~' ~y~ ~ rr4 ` ~+t~ ,~"`e° ~ ~'^t Y.' ~. ~~ ~+ d' '04 ~~ °~. •?'~''"±6~""v-~~:~' VICINITY MAP ~~, f0 + f~Jk a t. e~ ~^ :,~ , q , ~r\ v.,~.- 4 •- ~' g.'~1~ ~. ~,,~ / ~:. i 3 ,. d fi"`S d` L~J NORTH /~ .. ~ ~ ., '' 1. ~ is .~ ly ~ ~ ~ ,. Jr / \ a II j P c 35 - C ~~' S2 13 /. / ~ / / ° . ~ c <i SI' a, . , la, 15r I \ ,.\ ~ ~~ O : a2 L Z•.•~' /~ ` ~ n .i ~ s\o~e s ,Nap 43 _ 50 as ,r .~ ' ? .. ~ r , . ~.. •• 1, a5 / ~ a6 .l ~f _ J-~ ` r~ 57 ' 58 Kmpn.• o~ Wlnns o/ RppnMe Y 204, \R~ ..~ -- 68r ~ ~ ~_ ~ __ _~_- Gpaen ~. RoaO __ ~ -_~ COMPLETED Roo. ~U ~P ~/ \ C' ~~ ~ \f- DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC FACILITIES Colonial Avenue, Route 720 D-31 >. O `I / - a +,c j ~. AFWWXIAD S~ ~LDO< HAVEN . ,.~' ~ .... /.._ _ ___ ~ ~~ . ~ fi v u e° °~. - / ~ ~ : 1932 ~+~ t- 6.' l ~ / aLMrrE wLLS ~ .v y~c~ ~" sa ~ (~ 1/ ~ -- rJ /k~~~4 rw,,, '~WIGFiAr , "... .-~~5csb `~v' / ~ '!~ v„ 4 o RANDS ~ "" s';. iS. ~,,;ZA ~5 VICINITY MAP'"~~~6 ,;~~ NORTH ~~ ~\ I 81 ~ /~ 626 I f ~ ~ p ~5 OZ~ 510^ 0' °a r 5.'4 i 22 1 1~ ~4vrf / \ ~ ` S81 IS o~ 0 _ , ~ 14 i7~ o ~ o ~ ~- . '; o 154 /~ 8~~ ,ems, ~ °~ I 'G~ G- I, o~~ Y' 90T I0. 1825. 0 ,~ o, o J ~ ~- ~ ~ ~ o Y, (~ 805 .~~ - --------._ ~ "._ __ ~ X82? o 0 o'i 858 `~ ~ t -~ ~, ° e~ y °, o, 0~,1 ' ' ~ 185Q '~ o o~ i ~9~ o o,, o'' ~ ~ ~ I ~ p i8104i ~ ~: ,18~8`, 836 8a9! ,891 - S ~~ ~ `' o~ p 1 ~ °~, ~ .~ X88? ~ f 1 ° ~ `g 41 }p° 192 o ~R~, \\\ A / \ o~~ o j 92 ~ '' ,, ~ f 8 3Z p 906 ~ 84? . ~ o ,812. ~ i i 0. t o~ 1 a o ti o 19 Y'] gq } e 1819; t w o.. 'Be4 '818 oP I 4 0 t` ~~ D,~ m ~~ .1812 4 ~--/ `" o le~ ,6 m 1 0 ~~/ +1841 p` p`. /c{t~ / -- F456 ~' o ~ 1% 1' _ 1 I 1621 ~ 2 2 0. ~ o~ °39 1839 0~, I 1i82~ ` l4 l4~ 0~ ~ . ~o (1828j ~ o ,18 ~8~. N~ I D,+ 0 o~s i 8}6 o, o>b o D ~ i1 X622 , _ 18 3 I ~ u ~~ ~ ~ ~. 01 o' \. ~ ,623 194 1 O/ G Y/? ~ ~~ ~ ~~ C j8 ~i851; 18 0 ~lil ~5~0 t~ ~~~ ~ ~* i / ~ ~/ `~ ~~ ~, ~ ~ v, ~, . os 5 ~ o ~% ~18T6 ~ ^' ~ 'o ,~ ` ~ all : D ~~ ° 4 O'~ 187 0 0 o'g g. C: , O _ IB4 , p ` 0'' o !•D .2 ~ u ~ ~ ~g4 8 ~ ~18a9 ~-. ' o 164 0 I o o' ~.. o DEPARTMENT OF Olsen Road, Route 768 1" PURL IC F1ICILITI ES D-34 ~ r °J d MEq~`ppYV v~~~` 4 ~`"~' S } ..~' ~~ ~ y cx~r r~i xcr~s~~„/". ~. ~ ~~ ~r°~ IIOa•WFCpwn w••~d ~ w~n[o•it g. P ~Swrw r.~ ,f ~~f . ox,~..w... "~~~ s `~ t Otis; ~••a ~l ~ ,~~,+[x,.r [~o(K \ ~~ ff `~ ~Jf~ ~~ ,yds. 4 ~ ~ ''~ ~' t `ti`r~'J'Jl ,.~" 1`~°~ [ '; IP ~~,,e- P` wN~ ~/ `~~~ V I C I N I TY MA E'' ~~'u ,/a .,d/ !:ig .. ,.. ~ NORTEt /.; ~:\Oy , )~'~~ , / ~ .. ~~` 'b ... _~. ~` o ` ~ / ' /\ .. ~/ ~~ /• ~ / ~ ~i .:. ' \ I J.4 ,t • / / ~ •'' • ..•I. •••/•/ 9. .1 lJ ~ / , ~'' ~ K //f ~•, 'f '// \~ f• ill ~ f`• ~`~ ~' // . \ ~ .i~ 'e \ ~ ~ '~/ ~ Y ~', jam/ -~ vim'' ~ ~ ;~ .o~e~ :.<.... \~~, ~,~'d''••• '•~ ' ` s l ° ` i , ~r ~r,::o \ ,~ e'rr'` ~ ~~r~ }; / ) y \\ A~ `~ ~\ /\~ ! ~ .ir ~ \ ~ •y 'fir r' .~1.. 4% a. ,~-~ 1~1- ,~~~. D[;['1~I2'I'MF,N'I' OP Cove Road, Route 780 l'U1lLIC 1'1~CILi'1'Il::~ D 35 ~µ u~ )~i ~ ~ r g~ J J~ e1e _ ~~ Z'•1}• . yN~ ~r ` G~ I ,~r~irnuow •. r ,,,,9'.~ /,~'/ Bet~W+HC` ', 419. ,W % ~ °'~ ~gg~~~//T?% ~ ~ ~~. VICINITY MAP .~~•Z Td4~ dl I~wru w_. !ice _a~S. ~ _ ~4~' ~ 4 ., ~ r ~ °"''b° e` EOGEHII~,. EsT ~ - ~~ ~~~ ~ \~ ~ _: scP „,a- ~~ ~ ~ ~,` t ~ J ry+'3! 4~, . Gmrr,w Pd ,E RAttc ~':,'IG!i J A: :.1 ~ ty `L.~' NORTH DEPARTMENT OF ~ PUIILIC FACILITIES Ogden Road, Route $67 ,~ ,~ pax, ~ .. U ti ILL womw ale '~~ 'by _ .Ht _ N•p ~. m rraa~ U. •~ 4 ~ 8~lw ~ 4?9 . ^~ y P O ~y) GIMMOMT M. ~E 4r L ~T ' r.[ v ® r O W •` ~~ j ®~ ~"tu dry P rite =7 1 3 I ~ "KAAO~t p1 ~~ ~ -" c+KU ".~..K~~ j~~ .to';~~ ^ M`~~/~ 613 eE~~E 7- ~ ,p? '~ ~r~`TQ'~ ~~ 'a°°'~d~g~ ~Wftf .NO R.._M tr PD. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ `p+~~~~ , + ~qs p. , T; ~ 0~~ .~ . to3~•, ~,,R1 ~ tr , y '~ d '~ ~ a..~..,.~'- . ~9o,t.otr ' l -~,~- t,~" ~ tC7iES ~, p. Lllrs+rc.~r.uyc 41. $ tp~It.+r ~i~ , Yf Sr , _~ O. • h$T(M Mi~ k; is ' „~ w Toth w 8 "~~' ~.'`~`~~,"'~i1 ~"aG'r#~ VICINITY MAP. ~- . `~,' `.~«t~ ~ ' '~ ~ /, ~ „ ~ ,~ ._ .,. ~ J .,fie /~ ~ . r•-' w ' ~----- r ~ 1\, y , v w ~ • 1 '4n 1 ~,.: ~ c ~ ~ , r ~ „w~ / ' i ~. ~/ ~„ / O. ~ y o _ O .... ~ ~ I~.e _ ~.~~ // ,.~-~ Q ~- 1 / 0 ..... i _,~, __ O ~~ ~~ .~. ~. r' .o /, :, .,~_ .~~ ,;~~ NORTH DEPARTMENT OF Starkey Road, Route 904 PURL IC F1ICILII'I ES I :1 ~` / ~` _~ D-3 9 / ~, . ~+~NG~REE ~ .~ d / i ~' 1 d ~~ N .f~ S ~ ~,_~R~K y, fALLI 41M/11~.' ~~ . t AoK ~•, "~ ~~ .. \ kb' ~4 ?i r ~ j 651 _ _ ~ .'`.~ _ \.1 651 ~ A f _p''•+~~"ti~i~ .VICINITY MAP_ '~• NORTEi ,F .~~ ~ . ~~` 26 ' ` 27 +:.\ . /7 L l .~ 32 , ~~ 7 1... ~4~j// ~ I ` Y / '~ i :ti ~• ~• /O ° ~59 : ~~ `~~.~ Roo~oke ged~°~d a:~ S~ DEPI~RTMGN'P O[' Burnt Quarter Drive, Route 1083 ~~~C 1 ,PUIlLIC F1ICILIT'IES D-40 .._ . ,r . v ~.lT a" ~ N° , 1.' ~, I 53 '•. o ~ - 43 t °° S4 ~ s s~ 47 •rA , 9 oR 42 w ' SrJ ~ 49 " . 0 _ ,. 17 ~ °T n 52 ~ •~' ~ s• ~! 'K 56 r +o ~ ~ s rs i . icrl .f ^ ~, I s7 ..~ ~. ~ 13 r • • 63 o ($ I I .r '~~ Q NORTH pae .. .a .f 1° .~ 2 40 / 41 13 ~ti .r srh~•aa H ~, n3 re re ~aT vexes a'a!°ri ~ 7r ~ ! ep~ a a ~~! 64 3 65 66 ~ r, ra r• n 58 - 39 _ 60 ~ 61 _ 62 ~ ~ _ G ~ - ~ ~ 6 aoa (ans 6T J- ~ ~~' ~~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ Cresthlll -~ "~ 1 I o ~ ~„ ~ ~c! re so - - so .c a r ex e ~ n„ "~ • i I 26 _^ 27 °' I _ / 17 I :I Ig , a~ duj7~° ~ `' /rr 30 I ~ 'Ot~ ' ~ r ~ I p n n r ~" ra 31 4 h 'a n n !~ ° fr 11 rr 14 / e• r° 'a0 •a Q~' 8 00 28 ~~ : a 36 / ~ \ r,~ KIr1lM00d ~ 'a ey ro ° N , `~ ~ ~ ` ~ 37 •o / xo ra x s a 6' / '~ 33 26 ~ J 8 «° Al r ~ O a at ~ 6 °^ ~ r 16 a ~ $ ~ ~ ,t, e~ J 5 ~ s ^^\ rs ~ ~ °'r `o~d' rs O 12 2 . Ig / ~A 7 37 ~ a "' ,~ s '•r ry ^^ e w / ,, t• 33 24 13 y / e`9! ~ ? r ~ ~ , ~ 8 / °^ 10 ra . /'~ e, •r~ „ " ~^ 15 Y ~ .e 9 1 ' II ( r• 14 • ., 36 ~. 22 b' . • ~ ?i ra ghelbo~ tb,e1 ` ~Op g 19 ~~ HlII~~ goo a ~,... ~ ,` DEPARTMENT OF CRESTHILL DRIVE, ROUTE 1658 \ ~ PUBLIC FACILITIES D-41 \. -s~~., - ~ ~~ _ NOR1N . off,.: .~ Fg "DV ~, ~ • ~s •. -~ , ..+,•+°`o.~'' . k ~ ~ aua~iw~t'" ~ tl ~ ~ °~ ,•, .. - • ~, . .arow~rcu a'4r ~~O ; Ana y, ~ ~- ~ e VT(`T1.liTV rnnn~ _ ~ v / a. -- fii DLE'11[2'I'MENT OP Olsen Road, Route 768 r_~-'Z 1• PU[3L IC l~11CI[.I'['I ES D-42 :itit~ .Q_ NORTH 'n ~ Dn 10 \ j~ ee•.i eorr ~ I'I ~ C~J ti ' 12 J~ ' / rK ~ // /~~/ \er ~ `` `~ / • 12 e Jae r \. Roonnwe County O Boors o/ Suvirr~sors 4 I 2.52 Ac • , ac 13 ~' 1.:~ ~ 13 ~ 5 :i ~ la ~ 15 ~ ~ ''~ ~~ _ % I I ` ~'~) ae )c r 15 .. ee R ' O ?' ` e e, w~ e~ O 16 l0 6 , v ~; ~1 t 2p 22 •s,~ • , 2 3 '. .c ~ P '60„ ~i ! O ~ •a ~~ ~ . G / ~ \ ~ ~o sae s •. 8 6e p a ~ I ` e~ rc ` 2C !\ .~ O • : \ 26 ~ _ '.t O 1 ,tl 18 I 19 ~ v ' it `• A ~ iI ~ ~ ~ ~ 25 e 7 o O e \ i7 no ~ ~ r ~r o' a i ). er Leo e. ~o •e )~ sr e0 x " ~\ ~\ Nnrm Roonowr 1 ~ / ' ~~ ~ ~ ~• \ Bovr.sr`• Cnu•cn ~ ~ \ D1pv+b G / Y t .~ e 8 • / N5\\ 4 32 ~ 2 3 I 30 w 29 „ \ / / c..•. / \ \ \ ~~ r~ 33 ' ooa ~ ~ .. ~ \ 3 ~ \ 34 i ~ \ ` \ e.+• ~ \~ ~~ ~~ + \ •, \ J ~ 28.1 26 ~ \ ` 48 1 ~ 6 t\o " , i, • a 1.59 Ac \ J ~ U~ • J • • ~• a s 31 '\ \ \ 47 • \ \ o t' ~ \~ 32 o u 33 ,r \ ~ I s^ yl ~ \ \ 1.6~ Ac tDl \ \ \ \ _ l' \. ie t'' pt t, ~ e~ro . 2.~8 AC ICI ~i _i . w o~>; 2 /. 9 62 Ac ~' \51~1G1 ~~511`Gt / ' ` / y ~ DEPARTMENT OF ` PUBLIC FACILITIES BARRELS ROAD, ROUTE 1832 '~ ~ L-4 3 ~var~y Ew ~ :. ~gP ~; ~~ ~.,, ~..- ,.__~. _~. ` ~ ~' , cow` ,~ r~ 115 ~' D it . \ DENT- Pl pR~ 1 .' PC ~N.` fy ! ,. .ww.c ~w - •.~.,~CllreHOIAE n ~ ~ - O ~"r ~ ~ ~ ~ +,, ~,+es*,,,,, so,~~ R drm~ ~p~I~ ~. ~% s ,Caarai Ao~• ,. 4 ~~ uS ~„ 1•• ~a~ ~s Gic X0+1 a ,~; -'~~~~r HILL Foj r~':~~,. ,e -,,~ ~~~G, MO(/M!I/M 4B Wl W ~~~,. ![lMSfN 1 o$MANOR i -D "' ------- _ 4 MILES .~ i o z - ~- ~~,~,.~p `, ~ ~ NTS EK I,r~'- '.'{R.~F';:E~,, , `-`+` NKIVIL t~'~''~'. - t `.'' ... .ate... . .~ l $ ~'- ~. ~9 ~=:r ~..`~~t' -,:. ~i ERN ~NH.,~n`^3~ ., _ ~ ors v T C` T N T TY MAP i .. Vl$GIFI ._ O~~ ~po ~" ~J~ . Y~ ~ +! ~ e~'~P601/~~~~ anQlrH DEPARTMENT OF Verndale Drive, Route 1867 PUBLIC FACILITIES D-44 f,,F:'_•'/`: ~ j._ iC•"""'~~ .~. • 9p,,,. ;~.,"' •~ gas ~ .~` .~"'e ~,t~oor 4 tt ; ~ , ~, w~-'~rt=~ 4 \a~~p11•Mr~~~,~v,/'. ~~Y~>lf~~ .o Ni - =N~~N ~ltrt ""e.,' P' - 4,4 v. tM. ~ ~ \ 1a' kigr •, (pE~THILI • cw ~erooa 'brµ~+ ~' 221 R'. .. .~. !. •r ` o ~oc+lts d 14 ~ ~ ,/ i, 7ji ~ ••. O!'••''8 4u~ooi' ®p'1~ ~" '` 1GSTUVID , • \~li ode'/~`fe~ °f'p ~ '• .f "~'•/ ~` ~ '+~ J~ ~.~,'r" ; ,~ _RO' •419 ~ _ ~ ,.' ~ ~ ~. 3. g r ~t ~ •_ TOZ~,°' ~E4 •• 419 ~ tr ... ~dtyf 9 y°~ '; ~.~,~~"rr ..... ~~s} ~ ~ v ~E S~ p=u'ms~'Ns f~; LAI(E ~i ~F r~D' _ ~r ~ '~, ^~ J ~f ~'"9 Pe CASTIE'ROCK fM.y,,,o,,,e ~ CRES~VXVSn~r:l `/. ~ 9PJ` '. .'~ °~. a ~t4' ' 4R"q~` ~=~~a VICINITY MAPa~ w.,.'"+~~~g /• ~~. NORTH _. _ ,/ / /~ oa5``' i~~` ~ o~~~ ~ \~ 5 ~~, 6 .~ / ~ / \ \ 10 'R 9 ~ . SOt .` '~ \ \ 19 , • a2+ Go~¢ ~ \ Ig \\ 2 / I i e J e \ 17 ` V - ~ ~~ \ 14\ ~. ~ \ .\ \ Ol • ~ / \ 13 ~ \ 5.2 4 ~ ~. ` v \ r ~{ p,~e r `\~,,, g ~ ~ ~ \ 37 ~ .•. ~J Ls i6 . a ~ ~ • 51 ?r \ \ ~ ` '• z ` ~ `~ ° '~ low=ly 4Om.n~ttrot.vs Centsr 39 \ ' .P \ v ~ S Zse. o NCBS ~ 2 4041 fDl .~ 40 °_ `'\ ,d , ooe° • ~ 5 / '\ 4 O 3 78 AC tC! ~ei,• 10 vy /~ ~6 a ~e '~, ,~°..41 42, NCBS ` o e ` e s,: ~` - - s a ~ \ .ces ~ / : 9 ' ~~ 6 ~O7r ,' '% e C •• ,~ l 49 51 ~ 52 f , t re g r' IS ° 53 ~ rC ~~ fe 4 ~ 3 ~' 2 ,r 1 ~ °~'~ - 16 ~ - ~ 'O ~ ¢, 13 rr r. r. ~ .0 5 3 ~ , a • - 12 ~ ~ ,h ,.ai 19 ! u 9: s: 9: I7 _ ~ 57 ~ O~ O r - "1``/ ~ ~ ...--, ~ 54 '.,yS2 ~e ~ - - 46 S8 l / ;0. 6;.. ~ _ .. 60 59 : ~ ~ 57 56 • SI 19 gee 9F ~ • ` 59 t ~ " M / 15,5 • _ ~ ,. ~ . r' ~ 'ts ~,e ~ 45 . r e. 6.. ~ el6 18 ti'j'. \ o ~ 62 ~MC. e. s ~ ie'~• ° ~ ~ 44 ~ Rio ~ :~ ~/i 21 e~° ~ ~ ~ :a' ~, a e \ a n.. 32 a 46 ~ t., ` , . n t ~ t~s 61 43 ~ e /; _ 4 ~• 42~ •~ ~ X63 /41 ' \r~ ~ b4 ~, / ~ o_ 0 0 0 °o o $ o i o 0 c~ t ° r n o o 0 0 00 0 0 In In c~ c~ .n .n 00_ m m 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 a v ..._o o -- 0 0 ._..c o_ 0 0 ---.o o -. 0 0 -._._o o-_. 0 0 r e~ =m o o 00 ° $ o 00 0 _ o _0 0 u-~ o 0 0 In u-. m m o a v - - - - - o o _ - . - .. o o - - - - - - o o .. _ _ .. o o _ . . zl 0 0 ~r o 0 0 og 0 0 ~~ 0 0 o0 o ° ° oo °° I••I m m o 0 m m 0 0 N ~ Ly ~ O~ Y'9 Y"1 Q Q o U o ~ °o °o °o °o °o °o °o o° ¢ ° ~ c= oo ° ~a~ 00 ° O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O' U ¢ =o ~ rnm oo - ~ m m 00 _ r o ~ .~ ~ ~' In In v v . aL -_ _ ~ _ _ -._ _ .._ - --- -- ----- --------- - c` "'r. W _ A °o °0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ ° ~ ° ° ° ° U c o o 0 00 o o z °° m l ~_ =~ -----o~-- ~O u~i ----JO-- O O m ----oo-- ~D ap QQ ----oo---- O 6 • m F n ~ .-~ O d O O.. O ~ O N N _ O ~ O O ~~ •~ O O O O OD m ~_ O O O o_~ O O Q Q ~~ O O o O O O O Z 2 W O O O O O - ax 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O ° ~ •- 2 ~ .~ ~ p Q K (I'1 = O O u O O O ~~ W ~ d O O O O O O O L fA ~ W 2¢ 2¢ 1 ¢ ~ O W~ O o . ~ ~ _ d OC V ~ . . W~ . d K V O _ ~ W 3 OC V G ~ W~ 2 ~ I d OC V O _ . . I 2 W _ 2 I C Z Z O W u ~. O ~ ¢ J p. S G i ~ i 1~-- ° ~ W - ~ n ° ¢ N W N J = C O V I u Q ~ W j i ~ ~ z _ a i ~ a - i w 0 I ! o"o 0 "oooo ~ S O J Q ~- d Z 0 0 000 o 0 0 0 oooo 6 O m V 1 m ~ _ w L _ _ _ _ _ _ _ O J 2 6 J l.li O ~ T N T Z V_ D d' 2 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ O_ O _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ O_ O O GO _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ O O O 1 _ _ _ _ O O O ~ N_ to OV K D ~ 1 • Q . O+ M . 01 _ _ _ . O O 0 0 O O O O O O O O N N . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ . . 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Q V O O m m ~ .. . ~ _ O O ~ _ ~ . O O O . _ _ M . O~ 1 • Oi 01 ~ O- G - _ O O O O O O O O N N O O _ - _ _ G O O O O O G O O O O O O O O V O O G -• -• C ~ O - - C O O . i - - - ~ _ C _ _ O O _ _ - _ __. __ _. ._ __ _ _ __. _ - O _. _ _ O N . Ol O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O V V O O O O O . O~ +~ O K Q . . - _ 6 O N N - O O _ _ . ~ O O m m C C _ _ _ O G O O O O _ _ _ ~ O ~ O C O ~ 2 W ~+ d w 6 w ~ O O O N N O O O O v v m m ~.. ~ O_ T T K ~.. d _ _ _ _ _ _ ~ _. _ _ _ __ __ _.. _ - _.. _ ~ _ _ _ _ _ ._ _ .. ~ ~- OV ~_ ~ V GC w t!1 O O O O O O O CO O O O O O O O W N O O m T 6 V~ O'~ ~ T ~+ O O O O O O N N O O O O O O O O R O O O O O~ O O Q ° ° ° ° c ° °o °o 00 °o g °o "' o o o o o 0 00 00 0 ° 0o r u+ 0° 0 0 °0 0 0 0 .m m m ~n 0 N o N o° °o o° °o o o o o 0 v v N ~.. °o °o °o °o c°+ c ~ o° °o 0 0 0 0 o c~.~ o 00_00 v v+ o c- on o° °o °o °o ~ .o °o °o °o °o O o o r c z ~ _om -.. __-- N i o w ~ -.o ...- 0 o -. o ---..__-o . 0 0 0 0 ° °o °o ° 0 0 v vi¢ ~ .---_.o -._ 0 .n .n _ __ ~ o - 0 d ._--_.. ...o --. ,~ .-_ o --_ _._..o o 0 --.°o °o o°o ..- 0 0 o c~ -.-°o °o o_ o ~ o w w = ' o_°o o° c i v.-. o~'- m "' a :o .o "~ = o a o o 1 K V T R' 2 a o o . o c d K '- d fi r- d o 1 K O ~ 0 d~ C Z = J W Z tD O Z - r- m lA L O J t = ~". V W d_ = N~ W K W~ G . O ¢ ~ N~ O N .~ P to J p Z t~ 1 ¢ W 1 J to U ut - ? ~ Z O O K N O N N~~. A ~ _ ~ z o z z .. ~ ~ ~ .. A O q ~ G d K O ~ ~ ~ ~ urn - ~~ _ ~ W N ~¢'. 2 ~ LL W ~ M w M if w M M M 1 1~ M%• M x M• M ii M iF ~ M is ii 1t 1~ •e M• m K Q~ Z 2 ~ m 0~ V 2 •F M fi A ~Y M 1s w• T O [Il V O K~ w M M• w M+ O ~ b Z ~~ O ¢J W O tI'1 t¢/t tY T • 2 V D OC Z O ~ ~ OC A V O d ~ Owl V = ~ ~ S 2 O m Q V Obi K Y ~ O ih w w w w w M w as w O O N w M w O M w w w w w A O O O O O O O O w w w w w O O O O M M ppM w w M w 1 S O O O 1 ~ O ~ O O O J ~ O 0 O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 ; 1 m V O O G ; S O O O O O 1 O O O O 1 • • ~ . M . O~ . ~ O _ _ _ G O p _ _ _ G - O O O - O- ~ . O O O I ~ - G O w CIl 2 - - U 6 O O G _ _ _ _ _ O O O - _. _ _ G _ O O O p ~ _ _ _ _ ~ O O O O - ~ - O O ~ T ~' ~ l~i'I1 • O . O~ O~ O O G O O O O O O O 1 1 0 1 T _ _ O O _ _ _ O O _ _ _ _ - O C _ ~O ~O _ O O 1/') Ol m l!1 11'Y - O Q _ L_ ~ F•n ~ N ti ~ - - _ - _ - .- ~ O O - - - 0 0 0 , - O O O O ._ - - _ O O O O - - O O O - - O O O O O O O O Q C O 0 0~ ~O O O l/•l 1/"i l7 O O ~O 2 _ ~ Z O O ~ W 6 d' p~~ tf• u't V Q 0 ~~ M M ~ G U'] ~ ~ ti O ~ 07 ~ ~ O ~_ 2 7 S W ~ _ 0 O O ~ _ l~ l I!i V'~ Val Q Q O ~ _ ~ O C ~ ^ M M ~ [•• O _ _ O G _ ~ ~ ~O 1!f IA ~-~F-r O ~ ~ O S p ~ _ _ ~ .ti L ~ ~ ~ 6 3~ J W' J W O O w Vl d 3 ZO C O\C W E G G d Oc V 0 0 d \1' V O d OC V T Z O ti ~ 1 Z = L Z N L tD ~ ; c0 Ln ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O~ ~ M CD ~ O~ to J ~ ~~ ^I ~ X .~-. ~ O X u'1 ~O ~ = O X O X O _ pOp Y7 = F" ~ d' O (T ~-~ rv - d' Le ~- W Q K _ J 1 _ fY ~ r ~Y O W O _ _ ~ ~ OL {Zp ~~ O W~ _ ._ _ ~ ~' ~ {O Z ~ ~~ O W J ~ . . . . J a . . . . _ _ __ - G OC p 1 1 OC D 1 w d ~- •> V G~ V C 7~ 1 Q~ V ~ O Q G O: Q ~ K~ _ DC D W p O d' ~ 1 O K X00 V 2 N V ~ .... ~ _ O O V O J V 4") m V V 1 ~ 2 1~ ~' ~ V _ ~~ V m m V V .~-~ L (~7 O K d F G ~ >_ ~ ~ K K W ~ Y N 2 O m O V 001 ~ ~ D Z O tIl ° °o co+°o °0 0 0000 °o °0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ o 0 0 0 0 o c o 0 0 0 0 2 O J Q ~ O V _ 6 G O O O O ° 1 • G G C O ~ 1 . M 1 • OM1 i O `'•' ° ~ O O O O O . M ~ . 01 . . N O O O O O A U1 T . T OJ 1 O J O O O 1 . w 1 v1 ; M a2 W m O O O' ; O O 001 1 1 m 1 .. - _ .... _ _ _ _ _ O S O O 0 0 0 0 O r M ~ ~ M M T ~ ~p N N 1 m W M M c v M M ; OO m , ~ ~+ .~ . . _ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ _ O O O O ~ _ J O O O _ ~ _ O O O O O G O O 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O T P O G ~. O O V O O Q O Z W 1G a.0 N N 1•') s _ - ~ F•) M m m _ G ~ - v Q D l.. ~ ~ ~ 6 G ° G O J ° O G O O O d ___ __ _ O O _ ~ _ _ _ G G _ _ .~ _~ O O _ _ _ ~ O O O O _ C~ 1~'f 1G 1.0 N N M M v a M M QJ 0J W_ y1 J ~ ~ Q 2 ~ Q W Z Z¢ z 2¢ W~ 0 0 Z U W 3 0 0 ~~ ~ ~ 1y ~~~ d OC V ~ w ~+ ZO ~ 1 OC OC 1 Z W 7 L d W = O ~' ~ D 10 O Ul J ~~ ° O X O O X • o G c X po .. N o x o 01 ~ --~ -• Z Z 1 O O O _• _ ~ ° = l0 Z ~ tD Z U7 t0 2 ~ K O w Q ~~ O J ~ W 0 J 2 1~~ O~ J d ~ ,- G~ V D~~~ 1 D d~ ~ ~ N CY tL ~ J O w 001 S ¢ v Z ~. ~+ Z .... ~ OV S O O v o ~ u ~ ¢ V ~ 1 ~ W V • • • • « • • • M « • « « • • « « O« « « « • « « « « • « • « • « • « M « « « M M .. . .. .. ,. ,. » _ 00 .. o 00 0 0 " c cOO l o 0 0 0 " occc 0 0 o r o i o$ S S y~ O O 2 O J 6 Z O O O O O O O O O O 1 0 0 0 0 m O W O J O p O O G S N JQ O G O O o N CC Z u Y W o Vl lff ~ O • ~ Ql O O G G G G p 00 O ~ M w . O'1 - _ - O _ O ~ - 0 o O _ _ _ O - 0 p O - _ _ - G _ 0 0 ~ ~ - -O z -~ ~ o _ _ « ¢ « o o W m ~'' o ~ _ ~ m . ^ r o m i i . . ° __ _ _ _ °o c . .. . ° _ _ _ _ _ _ 0 o . . . . . . ° _ _ _ __ _ _ _ o 0 . . . . . . . 0 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ c c i ... . . . . . 0 0 ~~ ,. N s - W N ~ O~ O o c o c 0 o c Q ~ O ~ ONmi d' K O - ~ - ~ 0 ~ ~ - O N C ~ ~ O 00 O 0 O 0 T . CD m O O ~ II') 1 I . ~ . ~ . . ~ ~ O O . . _ O O O O . . ~ _ ~ . G O O . . O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 O O O O O 1 Q p 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 j p S ~ D = ~ ~ O O K O O O O _~ l!p_1 In Q .~_~ ~ C _ O O O O O O N VJ 4 S K W O O O O O O H ~ M O O O O O O i ..r m m _ _ O _ ~ U O _ _ _ _ j ~ _ _ ~ O G ~ ~ n ~ O O O O O l~ 1~ O O O O O O O ~ M M O O O ~ m m 1 H Q Q Q O W W V _ ~ d 3 Z \ 0 0 K V ~. ~ W 9 2 O O _ d OC V ~ _ W 3 Z ~~ 0 0 _ _ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ M m W 3 2 0 1 K G~ ~ ~ . . V ~ W m W o a~ s ~ ~ = u o '-' ~ m w s = a c ~ u m oc z ~ ~ m z = i ~ ~ V w th J y G ti O •G .ti Z ~ f J O L S N 1 H 1 0 N O'+ ~ S O N 6 Z 0 0 Il O O W G N d D O~ OG N q ( • W [F 4 J 10 OC ~' . ~ O O ~ ~ . . ~ ~ ~ I.t 6 O ~ ~ O ~r m . . ~ . W d' d V K~ Q 1 K ~' 6 ~ ~ Q' O m 2 10 Q Q S Q ~ K 6 U"1 S ...~ ~ U N~ C 1'~ G V w 2 iD W~ 2 O L r N Q N Q V V Z O m~ 2 [~ ... ... ... ,. 1- .. ~. ~ ~.....,. .... ,. ,. ,. ~.. .. 5 O Q ---- m t Y W W S tQlt K Y 2 ~ [lf Vt O W V ~ p t O d ~ ~ ~ ~ O V u o=c ~ z in ~ o z 0 ,. .. ,. ,. ,. .« .. M O O O M 0 0 0 00 O 0 0 0 0 O O O O 0 0 6 0 1 0 0 0 0 O O O G G O 1 O O O O O O O G O d m ~ OV O O O O 0 0 0 0 O 1 1 1 O O C G O O T M O O O G O' O. O 1 .~ti O O 1 ~ . 1 ~ G C i O ~ O '1 O .~ pNl O G G O O ~ Vl ~-. M U ~ O 6 p . W ~ • O ^ _~ G O O ___ O O O 1 O O O M N ~~ O O G O C O G O :~ m O O m - - . _ - . - O - . ... ° . . . . .. . . .. . .. . . . .. °o g m 0 G o c 0 0 . m m --~ .._ _ O O G.. _ ,'~ G O O __ -_ ~ O O O O_~ O O O O O O O O O O O O O Q ~p p G O O O O O O O O p !r = = 1 1 _ O p ~r WK . . __ __ __ O O O _ O O O S O O O S O Z pp p O 0 0 ~ O O 1lt O ~ O O O O O p W 1 ^.y V~ v `~ r ~ O Q v U9 N N - - - _ _ ~ - _ _ _ - > 0 - - .. _ _ O O O O O O G V O O O O O O M V v 0 `~ O O U't lI"+ O V O~ O pp O O S S O O V v N N 6 = 0 ~ V ¢ W Z 2 OV ~O ~ ~~ 6 2~ V~ N 6 N 6 ~ 0 0 W S O O 2 d' V d K V Z O~ O N C K ~ O Y N K N V d' Y ~ _ 1 ."~ V 1 ~ 1./) J 2 1 2 ~ Z= O O ~ 1 m 3 PQO t T. = 1 n~_~= 1 Q W 1 Q ~O -. O W ~O ~G V V W K p M N O M 1 d L~ Q (A Vt J = Yt N N O W Y W N= 7 1 O' K N ~ K G d. OC tD 1 O DC M O M 1 p O O S V O N 2 6 m O O O N ~ 1 1 m H 2 J I O N r Z Z 1 O 1 O ~- K E 1 Q Z tr Q tD W Q 1 C' 2 1 ~ OC w d~ O W J 6 O O o L~r m ~ Q ~.O ~ O~ W G~ HC ~~ OC ~ J Z D ~ O~ J 3 N~~ W OC W p V j = V ' Q Z 6 Q 1 K 7 V ; d' G OQC 10 d a.0 m ~ V O W 1 O N~ W O W _ W V !n V O O W _ W_ _ V U'1 V v Z l~ V ~ ~= V V 2 o m H ~ O 3 DC ~- Z ~ r w• r w w w+ r +• w • w r w» w r +' r r r w .a M N w w w M w• M• r• r w • "oooo" loop 0 "opo ; s ; 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 p e p W oooo toooo oooo ;. I 1 2 0 J J 1-- Z ; ~ I 1, Q O GO V ~ 1 1 1 O v _ m . ~G 1 _ _ 1 ~ 1 . . ~ _ C ~ W ..... . ; _ _ O .. _ i _ O i p p O O 1 O N UQ9 O O O ~ Z V Y ~ i ~ 1 1 E N • ~ I 1 1 Z ~ M ~D ..~.. ' p O I O O I T O~ O 1 O O 1 1 ~ • ~ - T - O O O O O p 1 O 1 O 1 i 1 - N O p O O O G O I 1 • O~ M In ~ ti M ~ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 1 I ~... 1 ~ ~ _ O _ C 1 M O O 1 6 % J O O O 1 ~ J J M 6 W d Y O 01 N 6 W ~ Jp~i 1i Y OC ~ 1 O O=C K ~ tIV') O O O 1 Y E S °z o m ~ - p O O 1 O °~ Y m G - _ ~ . . ~ ~ . O !b O G O O O ~ p j 1 . . O . O~ 1 0 0 0 0 O O O O 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 ~.O O O O O O G O G O 6 (D D O Z K O O O o O O O O O O O O j m D 4 ~ 1 6 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ O O _ - _ _ O O O O _ _ _ _ O O O O p? O O 0 i 0 0 p p p I O O S O G N m S O O O O O W = ~1' 'S IA O O N V v 0 o C i. . O O mN~ o NM a N N - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ _ - O O - _ _ _ 0 0 0 ° 0 0 0 0 O O o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ O O M O N O O O O O ~ y' O O m N~ O p N v O S r M N N m~ i i i i i in¢ in¢ ' iz i ¢ I O W S O O W~ 0 0 u I \ 0 0 1 (!1 V d DL V d OC V W 0 ~ d OC V O e0 = N V V O W W 1 M K O ~ m ~'- I I S V Z ~ . = L~ m Q O¢ ~ L ~- W F O N m J O 1 1 N~~ a I I ~ 1~ T . ~~ N a= O~ I N N ~ c ' p ~ _~ W U r- N S tf~ 1 O W Z p O S K~ {Z aF0 OC O tD O 1 F W O C W K~ O e ~ O~ O J 2 ~j 1 O 3 O N l i J _ _ 6 2 W U D I- J r- ~~ O 6 O p ~ ~ Y O~ t!> G O CG ~ IP1 A ~ ~• w ~ Y~ O l¢i N _ V Z ~.O ~- O x .- 2 O O f- W Oi tD c, c .- ~ 2 - ~O lD V m 6 o o ~-- ~ O Q m ~ N v~~=p O J W 6 f¢/9 6 ~ ~ V ~- T W ~- 2 C ~ t=O.) W N K D t7 1 r 2 ~- O T 2 ^ O H ~° Y Cn °z o m 6 V ~ ~ Y -+ K O N O 0 µ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O C L O G X 0 0 O W W v 2 O J 0 0 0 0 C G C G 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 6 ~ J S ¢ O C9 V i O O O O O G O O 1 O O O O O O O O O 1 1 O O I O 09 . 09 . ~ - _ __ - _ _ _ - G _ - 1 ~ . . ~ G - _ - O O O • M 9 O O O O . 0 N 1 -- ------- ° ------a-- -----o-- -----o---- o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m .-. "' + F ° ~ ~3 _ _ _ _ O G _ _- - _ _ O G _ _ _ - ~ _ ~ - ~ - G - _ - V O G O O O O a J¢ G QI O N N O O 09 K - Q 10 10 ID IG w Q O (i] N N . ~ >- a. f, f, CC [t] S o ~o o ~ S z 1 1+ o • CEO G O O G o c_ o_ G O C+ O O O O G G O O 6 O O O O O O O O O b O O O O m • 09 i m O v v O O 1/'1 ~ N N _ O O ~O ~ O O O G O O G O Y O O O O O O O O J ¢ Z O W O O O O O O' to ~ Y9 0 ~O 1 O O O O S 1 O O O p O O O G Oc . Y"9 ~ l19 O O 1 O O ~- Z ~ ~ O o d' Q v In V O y-~ N N 1 b tM0 CD O 1 0 0 0 0 X 0 0 0® 1 0 0 0 0 O Z Z O O O Y'9 Y'1 O O V O O O O O O O O O pp O O 110'9 O 110'9 O W LL 1fi O O 19'9 L~ YY O 1 Y'I .•. 0 a .~-. 1.00 1!t N N fl 1 9 I MM G O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O 11t- 00 Ym9 O ~+ 1p Y'9 0 .-~ N O O O O O S O O r II'9 < ~ O O S O Y0') O 1I'l O 11"1 ^ 09 O .r 1 ¢ L 1! O W V ~ ~ ¢ W 3 1~ V~ Z 6 W a a 2' V~ ~ 6 W 3 2 a OL V~ I J t.!) ¢ W 3 02 d 4\' V~ G t0 ~ a1 W 1 1 U 2 S d 1/0'l tr L ~ PLO _ 1 b y V V E N O _ O W 1 m m V W f /I 0 K ^ 09 L Ih ~ V N N 1 N ~ . J O OD _ N O~ G 0 d tIf O S¢ 0 v Q N W ~ O Z - ~~ 1/9 V 1 C G2'J m S O O ~ O W o . • w u_ C n a W in - _ _ _-_ _ __ _ _. ___ -°_-_ J ° _ - 02 o J __ _ ____--_ ~ W Q~ 2 ~ ~ 10 2 2 M 1 ~ O V N M ~ ~~ S L O O ti ~ 1 L K'W i O¢ V O ¢ q 2 % O~ 2 1I9 V Z Z 1 0 V Z to ~- L i ~ 0 1- a a a u a a W +~ a 0 0 0 0 a O O O O O O O O a a a a a a a a O O O O a a a a a a M a '-> O O O O O O O a a Y a M a a a a pp O O O Y 0 0 0 0 • y v ~ Q to vQJ"i p [r: T Z ` rl- D ~ O Q ~O m W d O= O O O O O 01 01 1!'1 Y'! IIWM"1 W u'1 O O O O O ~ ~ 10 1p 41'Y Y'1 v a O O O O O O O G O N ~ O ~W Q ~ A M 01 N • .tea O O _ 0 O C O O N N _ W ~ F - .. c o 0 0 . o c o 0 M o o r~i 1~ O^ 001 M 1G W r 1p N 119 v ~ _ _ G O O O O O O O O ~ 4!Y . _ _ _ . 0 00 °o °o O M N N O M aG 01 N ~ v!S N ^ N _ _ ~ G ~ ~ ~ , O ~ _ ... - . . 0 ~ O G ' N V OJ a¢ 01 . 01 ~l O O O G O O 0 0 IA U'1 Ut W W M M S O W C R ~ ~ # 2 W _ 01 O pOp O Q OO Y e ~ G Oi K _ d O -~ ti p O O M M m ~~ O O C O O~ C O W D' K ^ a 01 m l/'1 ~ N ~ ~ w N O O C O O O - G ' m ~ • Omi o '~ 0 ~ ~ c+ ~ O 0 O Q ~ TO O O ~ 1~ O Ifl J 0 0 0 0-- O O 1p 1p -- O O G O-- -- O O O O-- O O O O -- O O O----- O O O O ~ O Q ~ ~ ~ G M O O S O M O O 1 O N O N 1-- 2 m ~ ~ 1D O O M ) O p V N N Op 11"1 C ~ ~ ~ C~ e M ~ .-. .-. ~ N ~ N N T ~ 1I~'Y N t/'1 N b W . . ~ G~ j= K ~ _ _ O ~ O G ~ _ O O 0 0 v O O m to W W __ _ O _ ~ O- _ _ _ ~ ~ _ - O _ _ ~ 0 •o p - O ~ i . . . ~ ~ . O O O C 0 ~! IA 2 "' v c °o °o o° _ 0 0 o •[J ~ _ _ o 0 0 0 .. o o ~ yOj _ . 0 0 0 0 _ _ '~ o 0 0 ~ ['~ _ _ _ ..... _ . Oo° o~ °o c ~ ^ O 0 0 7 j .7 C. ' ~ ~-• ' j G O M O 1!I 1n p O 1/'Y QJ 10 OD •O N ~ QJ C- p •~ M ~ N O W O G ~"~ 1 .ti ~ 1~') VWi .-~ ~ N F 0 Oi M ^ 1 b ~ ~+ 1 10 m 1 1 t Vl OV W ~ ~ W~ ZO ~ ~ K C 4- W 3 Z Q ~ ~ G _ _= Q d Q U O 1 1 Q 1 d O ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ C ~ ~ ~ . 1 m f w O V W U1 J D ~o t0 N .N-~~-. ~~ V C~ 0~ ^. v z z O W'V O N N N m ti O ~r O~ `. =z W N~ M n ~ ~-. l 0 O~ 119 . V 7 Z O 2 M~ N V 1- 6 N Z lA CO _. .. G ~ ~ L = Wo ~ 1 ~ OC ~ 2 . 0 ~ O ~ K 2 O e ..a O ~ D O ~ O O O Nt .. .. 2 V O i W O O~~ = 3 . _ W K O~~ _ _ ~ ~ ~ ~' O W V ~ C ~ ~ J ~ T d. G W V _ O~ ~ J . . . N .. .. = 0 O~ ~ G W W p K O 1!'1 '~ K ~ v N ~ S O U ~~ ^ 1 G Vf N ~ C 1'. V d Q ~ O~ Q 1 ~ J 1- 1 V 2 M~ M 2 2 K Q . Q N 2 6 r Q Q ~ O M 1' V O 6~ Ot ~ V V O O L i ~} 1O <"! Q W d ~ a a a a a a a W m ti w f1 a a a w a 2 O V 1. Z a a a a a a a a W K V O a r O +i a as a a a V l0 O V 6 a O a a a a a 9 • w 0 0 0 00 .w ~ O O O W O o 0 o w 2 K Y w% p O O O% p 0 0 0 M Y Y • 4 Y M O O O O • M% M•% M M M 4 w w ~ ~ $ O C O p i S 1--~ O. . ¢ ~ O a. m OO .-. N _ . ~. `p Y W L - - - ~ - - - ~ - _ = W - - - - - O UO"1 pO y~ n S t+ m O m O ^ O O O O ~ 1 1 N ¢O N ~' '- Y V _ = ~ C O ~. - - G O - - - - - - G O O - - - - - - - ,~ - - - O O O N u'i V p~ p o - O - ~ - - - - O - -. - - o - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ O O~ O'. ^ p O S G O. 119 N N ~C ~ - - O O ~ O 1 ~ l O • - - - - - - - O M G O~ • N ' m - - - - - - - O O . N O O ~ ~ '^ _ - ~ C.1 N ~ - - - ~- - - O _ - - ~ - - O --- - --- - O O - - _ - - - - O O 1 ~. - 1 O G 1 l~ a0 O O O+ OI M M - - O O C O O O O Q L s O 2 ~ r Q D 0 d ¢ T 2 w W W = O- ~ w Y ~ O ~- P a O .r U W ~ 0 2 w W 2 0 OD p ~"~ ~ d' Y w - - _ - - - - - O O O O 0° 0 O~ O ~ ~~ O d - - _ O O ~ O 00 0 O G Oi C p ~ - - - - --- O O O O 1'i Ivi l!Y Q Q O _ ~ N _ O~ M - - ~. - --- - O O - - O O O M M -- - - ~~-~-_ O O o 0 N M N N N O N - - - - - - O O - ~. -- O O ' V V 1 G 2 O V - ._. - _ ~. __ - O M ~ __ _ ~. __ . V ~ --- ' O O m ~ v NO O O O O C O O O O O O O ' - - ~ M O ^ p OR O O O ~ w n p 2 p O O O O O O U09 uol p O. ` - .~ - ~. - - ~ O G O O O~ O - - - - - - O O -- O O O O O -------- S C O O - ~ 2~ .... ~ m p W ' v ~~ Oi i~ .-. M O O O O Y"1 ~ 0 0 N L~ O O - ~ 0 0 0 1 O O O O O O K Q v't - N .~. .-. ~.D GD ~ w ~ ! ^ G ~ ~ ~O ~ 2 ~ _ - O O ~ O O O O -- _ - ~..--- O O -- --- - - O 1 ~.. ~ . .. - - - - - - I p0 O K l=am a •O ~ ~ O G ; p O O O O 1 O O O G - - - - - - - G -. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ _ 1 0 0 0 0 O n n v O O O O 1 0 0 0 0 po I p p 0 0 ~'^ O F Oi O O O ~ O N~ 0 0 ~$ O O O O p w e 1I9 ti^ ~ m ^^ E N O f~ "' O~ O ~ .r Q N O W V 1-. ul ~ = Q a~ V~ ~ 1- 6 0 0 Z 2 Q 1 1 1 1 to 2 -- - . - - .._ -. W~ u - ~ o o oc u W ~ o a ~ ~ - - - ---. - - W N M c _ a - - u ~ - ; . . - - - - - - Z O` n. ~ N d' u-1 , V ~ C- ~ _ _ 2 W ~ ~ 4' ¢ ~ i N 1 ~O W K Y 1 d' 2 V W 0 W ' ~-. ~ 1 N .~-~ = M 1- cn v'i Z p~ ~~ _ ~ ~ V Z 1 O ~ V N~. g z x O 1 O~ _ K ~ ~~ 0 1 ~ ^ ~ C r- S Vl O W ! OOD Yl ~ f.D ~ nl m {~. O N b O ~ M .~. 1 1 ; N L 1 d' O 1- 1 N .. .. ~ ~ ~ O _ J O ~ [O W 1 Op _. 1 OI ~ OC F= = .ti ~ ... O~ 1 1 ~ IA V S - - - - - - ~ ,~ C ~ m 1 O W ~O W C ~ - i aOp OC W O _ N G 1 O - - 0 [ - - J = - O U.y t~ _. ~ ~_ ~ K - - K ~ p i O ~ O W W - - J O C - - - - ti O ~C W~¢ K u p - K DC N ~ j~ F _ = j¢ .~ 2 a V O = o o 3 S U. OD N Y 1 ' _ ~ Q • O~ 1-- ~ 0 ~ 1 Y V S~ S m O l`l V w w w r w w• w• 4 s s r w p 2 y w w • i~ w w w ~ ~ • • w~ at Y M M if O p 1 0 0 ti l¢~ Y M i ii Y M M M ~a 10 w ~. w w V +~ al r °o °o °o o° r O O p 0 «« w o 0 0 o w ~ o 0 0 o O r«« o« r• i o coi o o° w "•• r•• w r w i~$ g g % W ¢ 0 2 ~ 6 O 4 O V m ~. N W L ~ ~ - O W W ~ 2 ¢ N t~"I ~ _ _ _ °O O O O _ _ _ ~ ~ _ O O O O O O _ ~ - O I I O O O O I I 1 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . . O 1 _ Y _ Y~ V 2 ~ OC ~ tr ' O ~W Q • O O O C O C O G S C 1 O O ~ O 1 p 1 p • N Of O T w « o i t O p ~ G O p p O O O G O O O. 1 O l - O O L % J ¢ ~ « 6 p O W a ~ ~ u °' • ¢ W o '" 2 v a o i o °' ~ ~.- a o v w ¢ = o oz ~ ._ z om o ¢ m ?• ~ Y ti °O O _ - _ _ . _ _ o°OO "',a o0 O _ _ O O• _ - . _ .. _ _ c o o0 o c o°c _ _ _ _ ~ O . _ . . 0 0 0 0 Iii Fn f") M _ _ _ _ T .. . 1 O p ..oo..._ mm ~ m 2 ^ 0 m m 1 FO O- '. . 0 0 ~ ~ O O c~ o N N . . . O G O G M M m m O G ~ ~ O O .O _ _ o OI Oi M M O O O O O O O G p p M M ~ _ ~ ~ ~ ° ° ° ° O O m m O O ~~ I m m ~ F F 01 Oi ~ ~ ~ ~ _ ~ . ... '-~ 2 o o M O O ° o o o ° p O o o o 0 O O 0 0 0° °o I ~ H 2 O r 0 0 O F M M I O O F F I ~ m - = O _G li ¢ d' 1"l ~ _ M y m ~ ~ OI 01 10 ~O 1 O 1 1 n F N N 1 . ~ _ an m c ~. _ _ . .~ _ °o o° o° c °- M °0 _ _ _ c o °o - - c• 0O - - O - o o - - o - - 0 0 0 0 - - - - ~ o000 - ~ 1~ o f _ _ _ I.°-. ~ o o c Iri N °o I: os ~ 0 g o ri ri 1 ~~ d N~ OMi ~ _ N N _ _ _~ _ ~ _ N ,... - ~ _ 0 0 0 0 w M N F « O O O G O H O G L~ ~ O _ _- r~ O C ~ V-~ ~ °O _ G ~ ~ . . ~ O O O O O O O ; ~ . . . . . . 1 0 0 0 0 O O p O 1 O O O O p W ~ ~ ' O O F F F m 1 w lI'9 O M M M _ ~ p W V ~_ Q W 3 2 1~ V F0 t- W~ 2¢ ~~ 0 0 VI Q W 3 O O 1 I 4J 3= S . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . . _ ~ ¢ Ci K ~ S ~ V O O ~. Z ~' ~ d' u°l d' ~ m V ' d' ~ N F J ' ~ K N p ~ _ • ~ tp V w O ' Z ~O W M a ~ G ~ + p ~ ¢ ~ ¢ M K Q m O Ill - Ci O O ~ •--• V N t 2 W J p ^ N G O ~~~~ ~ v d' a ~' O~ M Z Q O p p ~ I-- - C O=C . K W m°~ O N _~ Q IG O~ O D MO d~_ M, S O Q W' I CD V M ~ = M S N D ~ - - - - - - • J - O ¢ O - _ - _ O V V V c¢D ~ p m T iD O aO GC O 2 V _ . ~ fI1 ~ ~ . . ~ ~ .. ~ ~ C ~ - ~ ~ _ . W K ~ ~ 1 ~ p K ; . 6 T ~ ~ 1 p p ~ I ~ ~ V W N K V Q O~ p O- N~ ._. Z 2' ti ¢_ 01 N Ci ¢ O 2¢ ~'. OC M M V VS ~ ~ ~ V .~ y O ~ V .... ~ ~ O w M M•• M M % O K~~~ if • M % M % Y M O~ f- ~~ r i! Y « M it M w M ~ .~ V 2 O GC ~- ti M if • M M 1~ M M~ V V O GC I-- ¢ I L~ M M M M M M• y% y 11 «««« _w W « r o 0 0 o r ° o~ 0 o 0 c r r« o0 0 0 0« 0 0 0 r w r r• r r op o 0 0• 0 0 0 w« r•• w w r« ~ o 0 0« ~ o$ o o v c° W r-. o m ~ o °' °' 0 0 ... .... o 0 0 0 °o °o o° ~ e ~ o c o o i o 0 0 0 ~ m .-. Q N¢ O ce Y u'~ Z v ~ In N . u _ GC D _ • M • ~ O o _ _ _ O G O O O O N N O O O _ - . O O ~ O O p G 4!I N N O O O G O . . . . ~ ~~~.. O O O O O O 1 ... ~ ~ _ ~ ~ . Z ¢ f.1 K Mi N . 01 • w Ni it fIl ".' K O ,.~.~ M O • ¢ D _ W 07 « O O O O O O O O ~ m T ~. . ~ _ _ O G G O O M M C O O O G O O ~ O C O G O O O O O O O O O O ~ O ~ O ~ O 1 O O O ~ 1 1 ~ O 1 O ~ O d ~_ v ~ O Ol 2 ~ W - O Y O ^ 2 w H ~ ~ d' Y Z « N ._ O O O O O ~ . . . . O O ~ Q tOj ~ ~ O°i O O p O O ~ > --. ¢ O~ ^ II'1 - V V O ~ Y to O O O O ^-.~ O O O O O m m . O~ .. ~ N pO O C - o ~ N n O b p O O O l°"1 6 _ O O J G _ O O O O . _ O O G O ~. G~ G _ O O O O _~ ~~ O G ~ O O ^~ ~ ~~ ~_ z O O O O o oc.o O O O G O - O O O O X 0 0 ? -vao O O O o°o D LOi K ¢ P. ~~ ~ O a 10 N N N M ~ N M Obi ~ O S 0 o W ~ 2 W o O O _ O _ _ O . O _ O O O O O~ O^ _ _ O - O o - _ - i ' VOl 110') O T O O O O O_~ __ O G O O_ _ O O G O_~ O O O ~ C ~_~~. O O O O O O o - _ - M ~ O O Y'S ~O O O O O O O O N a00 lI9 O V~ O O O O o~ 0 0 ~ - 11') C n N N N •O N M O O O O l/Y IIOI O -~ ~ D L ~ O V ~- Q W 3 0 ~ _ [!1 ¢ S Z ~- - to ¢ ~ /- ---1 N W Z d~ V~ n. K V~ W~ ZO G O O~ ¢ W= O O 2 N tIY S O ~ ~ a V W N J 0 o 1' ~ V i ~ V _• _ M Z n m W V _• C d' ~-' N L O M M h- N G= V ~ N U• ~ N V _J ~ ~ ~ G Z ~ F K N L 1 N (D 6 K m W .. ~ O0J 6O. ~ O Oi O 1=' M 1 lJi ¢ ~~~~ 2 tD O ` K D IZ- ~ ~ Z ~ N 01 ~ O O O J Q 1 O~ Z O~ O J W K ~ O W O M .. 2 V I M N ti N M ~ U . . C ~ J ~ . . G ~ ~O J W ~ ~ ~ ~ ; t 0 G = ~ V ' W W =O ~ W~ V V N K i~ Q~ V G ~6 Q: y C O Q ~ M~ M ~ O~ Q. j WO M t 2 ~O Z ~. N . -. ~ M D -_ W -7 O V K W w w•• f ~ s s t • K r ~ r t• « s M s' as + a M» r% K% M Y G 1s M M~ N M M M 12 •,~ i ~,. N N .. N N W N N N N N N• G G G 0 0 0 0 '~ w» N N N O O O O N N N N N N ~ N O O O O N N N ,. ,. M N N N N N W w 0000 00 0000 S S O O ¢p ~a . . _ m o O V_ V m .-~ .^ W Z ~.O O ~ ~ T _• 2 u Z ~ ~ O o0 o~ O G O 00 N N O G G O 0000 O O ~ ~ G Oi ~ M . w N O O O O p O O p ti N O O O O O O C OO O O N V'1 F G O C O p O C O O O 8 O N N O p O O O O O O O O O N O N N G Q » 0 o N 6 p • ~ ~.. K V O~ d » ~_ a N~ O phi O O ~ _ O . . O _ _ _ _ G O l/'1 Ifl N N ~+ w ~ ~ ~ ~ O O O . lI•) O ll'f ~p O ~O M O M Z ~ O~ ~ O ~ ti N U F- # W O 2 G O O 0 0 0 ~ N M O O O O Z O m ~ a"~ ~ ~ QO O O O O O p G j 0 C O O O O O O O O n C p H') O O V9 i Q O V Ul m _ ~ __ _ _ O _ _ _ _ _ _ U O O H F F [~- O _ C O m 0 0 OD M O O M N O C c Z= O ~ ~ O O O O o 0 0 0 i O O O O p G ~ ~. ~j f O' i 0 0 S O C~ 0 0 0 O 1 S O O S O N O ~• _ ~ O Y"1 O OG .--. 07 N? G O O O O O_ ~ O O O i N ~p UN') ~O D 4. WK Q .-. N M [ .r N N O M N N Oi Q b _O .~. K ~ d O O O O O ~ _ O _ _ O O SO pO O S V e o O O O O aJ O O O 0 O O O O O O O O S O O O O O ti U9 m O O^ 0 O G O N ~ ~ ~ N M O O p O O O O O O O N N L~ O pOp /l O V1 1/") b N ~p ~ N a M ~ W _ ~ O W V ...1 LU Z Q d O\C ~~ 1~ _ • Z Q d oc u~ ~ w o o K 1 i 1 ~ W~ = N Q O . ~ ~ = ~ . . . ~ ~ y V ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . W t1 . 1 V ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 d d' V . . 1 O = 1=-• V W Vt ..~ A m O ~.O L ~O W ti > O O A y V m W Q O V ip ayj ~ .-~ fI9 J ti G V Z= m _• O ~ N 1~ N= O ~ H _ V L Z ~ v m O H H M V I N C O O t t V W ~-- p O Z Q L O O ti W _. N p ti o O p m D•' I- W ~ _ O ~ Cl ~ K O Z O OC OC ti t b ~m U b d ~ CO O O .. .. = V O .M.n . ~ _ .. .. ~ __ Q O .. p~ O W W J K .. W b OC O W O L ' . ~ . ._ _ G ~ J R _ i .. ~ K C 1 ~ V .ti Q j ~~ K (/') ~ ~ Z 6 C j V ~-. J e d a ~ H^ V 2 O V G m ~~ OC •~~ A• D pC OC F ~~ 2 ~O K ti t!Y V N N 4 N N N N V Z ~ OC O N N N F N N w N N ~,p V ~"~ ~ w 2 N N N N N N N N Yl D V O 2 V to p Q~ LL N M N N M N N O ti OC V \O W V Q O= `- W 1 N N N N N N N N N N 13 • ~• W M• G O O O M O O O ~~~ 0 0 0 0~ ~~~ 0 0 0 0« « M~ O O O S«~~ • ~' 2~.+ W Q C 2 6~ O m V O 0 0 00 O O ~ m~ O O O O 0 0 0 0 1 O O O O 1 1 W Z ~- _~ uJ¢'i ~ ~ > • ~ . 00 O C C O G _ ; _ ~ ~ _ _ 1 V a- ~ W V 2 C ~~- O Vf Y9 1 p 1 1 1 V K D . ~ M ~ 1 ~ . . O O ; O O O p 11') N ~ ~ _ . . ~ C O ~ . . ~ ~ ~ C . O O 1 1 . ~ .. 1 O 1 1 1 1 I . ~ • O~ N . Owl _ _ ~ ~ _ O O _ _ _ O O _ ~ ~ O G ~ O O M M - - .y ~y ~ ~ . . ~ O G _ . . . j ; 1 1 O O - m ~ 01 ~ • U9 O O O O O O O O lO` n _ m ~ m N M O S O O v O V O OD . . M M s Q O G ~ K d p M !Y ~ W O O M O B u9 O VS - 1 m. O ~ L~ O `- Z y O .-. _ • W O~ ~ w Q ^ ~ - - ~ O w I O V ~ ~' M Q M V . . ~ ~ b _ _ _ ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ _ ~. O ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ Y N F=~- M 1~ J O O S i O 2~ ODD O pl ~'' ~- 'ti q ~ ~ O OOOi ~ _ T O O O O - I O G `` ''• Omi _ O. Q1 N N ~ Lp NW V~ m ~ ~ m b O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O C O ~ O C 1 O 1 1 1 i O . ~ ~ J - 1 0 0 0 0 C L i O G 0 0 O O O O O O ---Oo--Op---__ 1 0 0 0 'O ~ ~C 1- 2 ~ « pp p S O O_ S Y9 O O p O O~ q - ~ O m O Go IM O 11 l ; m ~p ~ ~ $ :N p~ W m 0 ~~ .~ O w 1~ 119 O M ¢ K M - M M N M ~G I pp p9 1 .~-. ~ 1G j M N (D O O . ~ O O O O _ _ ~ ~ _ . . ~ I O O G 1 1 _ ~ ~~ pp~ ~~~ i ~ S O 7 2 = O O O O O O S O 0 0o C O 8 1~ m K l a. a . .. _ I v9 v N - O O - - pp M '. II9 1 Mf 1 Y9 Y"I I^'f M1Y 1 ~ ~ _ ~ ~ _ 1 0 0 0 0 ~ _ _ 1 0 0 0 0 _ I _ _ _ -- O O O-_- 1 0 0 0 S 1 - j p_ p- p- ~-_-- 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 i p p I O O O O I O O O~ 01 m I O M C M i O V9 O Yl 1 p m ~ 8 GD N 1 Y9 O IA O OO O p 0 N O I D ~ ~ u9 M O N M n T ~ r [~ O~ 1/') t P i fn O W V ~ t/1 Q 1 W 3 2 1 d K VGV O pZN _Q 1 O\C V~ ~ ~ N W~ Z O d GC 1 1 1 1 1 ~/ 1 i W ss Q 1 O 1 ~ \ . _ _ ...... ' . V ~ 1 d O (. 1 ~ Z O ~ ' Z 2 ~ K Z W W M Y `. K U 2 z 2 1 1O oN U W ..1 W d ~ ~ F N ~ T G 1 V 01 == 2 I O W O L L .~ 0 0 W O .,. 1 p J 01 O S 1N O 1 Z N O= N • . 1G I N OC L N V ^ p ~ m V 1~- O_ O GC O . O w H _ p 0 0~ ~ O K O w ~ ~ W K IZ- S G ; O H O W_ LLI 0 0 K 2 ~~ G= W _ Oj = S N I O 1 IOO .. W V W V O J I- 0 ~ ~ 1 p oC d _ 0 ~ K N Z ~ S~ V O ~ M~ m •--. Z ap .a G -..., V = N~ ~ Q O N O .... I Z H OC 1 p~ p ' M M M• M M ~/ G Q O V 1- • M M aF ••• •p Z •J lri ~ __ 6 N N 1f • M• N N 1D _I l./t M M o l '- l¢i w M A M 1+ M I m J V ~O V N 1 0 Y H W N M M M M M M M M M 14 w M M w w W w w w w w 1 0 0 0 0 M w M w w 1 0 0 0 0 w w M M w ~ S 0 0 0 w M M M w• w M 1 0 S O S ~ -- 2 LLi O O O O o 0 0 0 O O O O 1 O O O O 0 . ~ m^ ^ _ .-. N 6 O f]O V I w W v W 'L N G N ~ _ - _. _ _ O _ _ _ _ O O _ _ ~ . . O O _ .. .. . j S ~> i t- 2 O O O I O 1 . O W G ' G O S O O O O j 1 O O ' ~ r ~ . G1 C~ O R R ~ 1.00 _ O O O O O O OI OI O O O O O 1 O 1 O •~ • N • w N N N F 1 O O 1 ti w O O ~ O ~ 1 w O O M M O O O O 1 O 1 p • 01 117 N m m ~ 1 M lA w O w M M 1 L i J O O O O O O O O S O O 1 Q w J w Q O O O O O O G W OI w O O O O ~ O 1' ~' 1 i d' V M W W ~ O M~ v N Y 2 v O O~ p j w} O ~ ' N 1 = ~ ti d ~ 1 w O V V ~ ~ ~ w V _ ~ ~ . . _ _ ~ _ . . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ...... . ~~ Y l!1 i~ W O O O S 1 O O 0 2 S V m 0 M ~ O 01 O 1 O O j 1 1 S O ' >~ 1 ~ `~ OI m I 1 O O 1 Q G 2 ~ w » 1 LO ~O 1 ~ V of ~ O O .O O O O ~ p~ p~ p~ 1 O O $ T . OO m • w O O O O s 0 0 0 0 O O N N R N N p pp 8 1 0 0 0 0 O O1 w N N R m 00 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O S O S O ' Q 0 0~ O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O. O O S O O S O D 4=r O M ti O~ 1/'l ~~ N N N N O~ w M N d' r. ~ N Z C - C . . ~ _ G _ _ O _ G _ _ C _ _ _ _ _ - O O = O~ o O O o O 1 O ~ ? _ O 1 ~ N N 1•"1 M R Q O- O C O- _ O O ~ _ ~ _ O O - _ ~ ~ 1 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ p . . . . 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 _O O 1 0 0 0 0 ; O p O O O O O O O O O _ O O O O O O G _ u". 1Rff ~ .-. OI m u'! N N r'1 _ ~ ~ v ~ w Z C V _ W ~ ~ ~ ~ = ¢ 4l \ 0 0 a K _ _ ~_ S W Z _ d K O C . . ~ ¢J W 7 2 a K V . ~ ~ O G . . _ W 3 2 Q d K V RO . . . zo a m ° ~O .M.. ~ C W °c V ti O N u W N .- Y ~ to _ W = t7 .ti a.p O d' Y7' Y R Y . f.Q J O~ S Z Ol ¢S p ~ ~C 1-~- ~ O ~ ~ OC O W 1 N V 10 V 1 m m Q O p O~ ; N W 2 0' Q ~ W Y 1 O _ (~ 1 N 7 C {n . 1- N O {,,1 V OC 4'l O Z Q W 1 O W 1 W O ~ O N ~ _W LJO R O W ~ O ~ ~ ~ i ~ . .. . OC ~ t~'~ O O: ~ _ . . G G . . . ~ m .. . ~ . CC q K WS 1 1 6 ~ O i 1 1Z- U q 1- a Q d_ O V D 1 J ~ V d' N ; O N O " L O~ 2 ...~ tD ~ tr _ 2 Q I l=D YR9 H fA ~r 2 Q W J V O V O 1.' ~ O l 1.0 V (,If O } ~ IQ N V a0 O ~¢ V i w ~ r w M M M M w i w M w iY w M is J t- w w w w w w w w O in ~ 2 w w w w w w w w M O N ~- 2 M M M M w w w w w 15 <~ 0 0 0 0 0 W W 2 W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O' O O O N M 0 M ~ O = O Q~ 1 m C 1 II I Y N N~ 4 m~ M m T ~~ a0 2 6 J O O K Y N S u O O . } W 2 o F- ~ Ut N O W- _ - - _ _ . . - . p - G _ _ O O O G o 0 O 0 p~ O O 119 l!] ~ [+ ') O ll 1 O tl N O OD .ti M O N •O Ul ti _ _ - ~ - - O _ _ N ~ O O O O ~ -- _ O -- - _ - O O O O M O O M lJ~ O_ L~ _ ~U [~ ~O O ~-. U9 L~ ~ m M N ~+ N --- -- {/) y O N". pi ~ O O O 1 O C> O O O G O O O OD ~+ 01 O 01 m ~O O c O v ~O O_ M w N ~ M N N t GU . . _ ~ C _ ~ _ ~ O O S O ~ ~ ~ i 6 OC ii J Y Q O O m M In ~D V C7 O - W !~ N N 1' M OC U C M m O'1 d • Q O ~ m a Y 2 Q ~ O O~ M> - O O~ ' ti N J d V>> 1' OC ~ 2 Y to ~ O Z 2 0 OD 6 V OO O O~ % N O O~ O~ O O O O O O O O O O O O 1A N r O_ N A M N O N ~O ~-. 1/9 N 1' i- .-~ OC 6 Z O m T . . ~~ O II9 O O ~O M .-~ Y . . . ~ . O O O O W ' O O O O O V 1 ~ O O O O~ O~ N ~f9 Q O N m m O~ t~ O~ N O~ M IA M N 1I1 O M O~ .~-r M O Q K O S J O O O O O O ~ 6 iD D O O O O .ti ~O aG M 2 2 W O~ OC Z O O O O C~ N O O O O i~ CD F- O - ~ m O l~ W d' 1!7 ~ M M .-. ~O Q ~. Vt O O O U ~ I~ c i o o+ o~ c~1 ~ ~ ~= u i o.r N - W ~ w O~ ~7 a" ~.omW <'1 _ _ _. . --_- _ _ .--N v ° ° 0 o O ~D o 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 o ~ fo ~--~ n u' ~ _ m r -i r i ~ ~ ''~ t+l d i : - r ~ q .~-~ ~-- z.n -~ O .-v an a~n¢ W '3 2 ~-- ~ o0 a ~u~-- cn W 3 Z ~- 00 d~v~- 0 x s z a .- . to ~ s V W J u vi z ~ O L O C n p ~ p O O _ L CD N _ 6 O O O _ N H ~ O ~ O . O 1-~ 4 I W 6 V M 6 ~+ 1 O J ¢ M OC N d' 1 T ~ v ~ ~ N ~ V i o .~+ •• w r r r o u ~ r r w r r r r r ~• r as • a` • rc~ r w 16 o~ ROANp~.~ z c~ ~ 2 '~ ~ `~ ~ ~4 ~ o a ~i V ~i~i 4- - ~i ~i i $ E50 $$ SFSQUICENTENN~P~ ABcauti/ulReRim~inR BOARD OF SUPERVISORS BOB JOHNSON. CHAIRMAN HOL.LINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR LEE GARRETT. VICE-CHAIRMAN ELMER C. HODGE WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT ALAN H. BRITTLE January 14 19 8 8 CAVE SPRING I+tAGISTERIAL DISTRICT , STEVEN A. MCGRAW CATAW BA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VIN TON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT Mr. Prentiss A. Webb, President LOA Board of Directors P. O. Box 14205 Roanoke, Virginia 24038 Dear Mr. Webb: Attached is a copy of Resolution No. 11288-8.d concerning support for state funding of the Virginia Department of Aging. This resolution was adopted by the Board of Supervisors at their meeting on January 12, 1988. If you need further information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Attachment P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 2 4018-07 9 8 (703) 772-2004 ~ f GuE o OLDER , ~ AMERICANS 706 CAMPBELL AVENUE, S. W. P.O. BOX 14205 ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24038 TELEPHONE (703) 345-0451 December 14, 1987 Bob L. Johnson Chairman, Board of Supervisors Roanoke County P. U. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 ~~~ Dear Mr.Johrrson: In your position as the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, you are familiar with problems faced by the arellnot be nglmety whom we try to serve. As you might expect, there are some whose needs The Virginia Department for the Aging is submitting a biennium budget of $13.2 million to be apportioned out to the 25 Area Agencies on Aging, which includes the League of Older Americans, Inc. (LOA), to help meet these needs, serving people who are not now recipients. The Virginia Coalition for the Aging has made support for the fund request their highest priority. Roanoke County has always been a staunch supporter ooval ofOar esoluthon I ke the one grateful. V'Je come to you again now and ask for your app attached for your consideration. If it is approved t would appreciate your having it sent forward with a copy to me. Sincerely, ~~~-~~~' Prentiss A. Webb, President LOA Board of Directors Iwt Attachment AREA AGENCY ON AGING SERVING VIRGINIA'S FIFTH PLANNING DISTRICT RESOLUTION WHEREAS, The Area Agencies on Aging which provide community-based services to our older citizens have become more proficient in the location and identification of elderly people whose needs remain totally or marginally unmet; and WHEREAS, These stressful problems include, but are not limited to, nutrition programs such as Meals-on-Wheels and Diners Clubs, respite care, home repairs, ombudsman services and homemaker care; and WHEREAS, The numbers of the often frail needy elderly grow in consonance with the overall rapid increase of our older population which continues to increase more rapidly than the general population; and WHEREAS, The mechanisms for satisfying unmet needs exists and functions through the League of Older Americans in Roanoke and in every area of the state through its remaining 24 Area Agencies on Aging; and WHEREAS, It has become impossible to stretch further the funds currently available to fulfill present schedules of services and programs for the elderly and also to relieve the unmet needs; and WHEREAS, The Code of Virginia (2.1-373.4) declares that "it is the policy of the Common- wealth to support the development of community-based resources to avoid inappropriate ins itu- tionalization of the impaired elderly. „ V~rq~n ~a THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, That the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke Cou hty ~~+~ ,^,;s::.:~d does hereby urge the Governor of Virginia to take action `~ ~^^"^ .~ai~~ requested by the Virginia Department for the Aging to help it to respond fully with a range of locally determined life sustaining services to needy elderly Virginians. ~pANOkF O~ ~ ' ~ G> z Z 7 pJ :: a ,5~ as ~ a ~EaaS SFSQUICEN?ENN`P~. A t3cnuli~ult3cginninK COUNTc HoDGEISTRATOR ELMER C~vixn~~ v~ ~,~v~nak~e 3anuary 14, 1988 Ms. Mary Parker City Council Clerk of Roanoke 215 Church Avenue S• W' oanoke, Virginia 24011 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS BOB JOHNSON. CHAIRMAN HpL~INS MAGISTERCHAIR MAN LEE GARRETT• VICE- WINDSOR HILLS M ALAN H `BRITTLE GAVE SPRING IAAGISTERIAL DISTRICT STEVEN A. MCGRAW CATAWBAHARRY CAN~ICKENS VINTON MAGI`''TERIAL DISTRICT R 11288-5 concerning Dear Ms. Parker: of Resolutio the Regional Airport Attached is a copy ital eXpenditures by ted by the Board o approval of cap resolution was adop 1g88, This 3anuarY 12, ion. meeting on do not hesitate to Commiss their Supervisors at lease ou need further information- P If Y contact me. Sincerely. `~~~~~ ~° Deputy Clerk Mary g. Allen Board of Supervisors Roanoke County Attachment embers of the Regional Airport Commission CC: M E. VIRGINIA 24010-0798 (703) 772-2op4 P O BOX 29000 ROANOK O~ POANpr,-F ~° ~ u~ ~~~n~~~ J a i$ $ 150 $$ SFSQUICENTENN~P~ BOARD OF SUPERVISORS A Bcauti~ull3cl;innin~ BOB JOHNSON. CHAIRMAN HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR LEE GARRETT. VICE-CHAIRMAN WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT ELMER C. HODGE ALAN H. BRITTLE CAVE SPRING tAGISTERIAL DISTRICT January 13 , 1988 STEVEN A. MCGRAW CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT Ms. Ruth Wade, Clerk Roanoke County School Board 526 College Avenue Salem, Virginia 24153 Dear Ms. Wade: Attached is a copy of Resolution No. 11288-5 concerning approval for appalication to VPSA to borrow money for capital projects. This resolution was adopted by the Board of Supervisors at their meeting on January 12, 1988. If you need further information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, '¢ . G~1~-o-~'~ Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Attachment ~~~ ~ - °~' ~~"~ . P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24018-0798 (703) 772-2004