The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About8/9/1988 - Regular - ! t: C: J i i~JLGJ ~.`v r~l.~ ~ . Y'~ li rc ~. r+ ~ v i~ 1~ ~ i, ,,~ t, v T Y Cl:r'a1~L ut" JUNtKV"'IJIiK;~ 3.~3v i::rl~ i::Lt~uiv ~vv }} tl L u h L A C ti :J JT+T~ Li 1- vi~~1?VfrK i, I T Y i/F RCriv~_:~ r1h'F1lr+'viT ~•r t'ic~.lLr+1 ii:i'~ u~rl~.t~ ~=~" 1t r.~+1Ln l,Lih- TI~'~1C_i-vr'L.;rZL= tu,r'ut~N7iu~vt r~vr~vi.li~t- rC~hMt ii.ty I~ +~~Ll~r-scr. ui- Tric T I ~`, ~; r~ ~ ;~, t_ ~- v t I i~ 3 H ;_ J T >*i i r< ~.~ r PU~%~-L Jntu 1~+ R~JI# ~UIt`-t j 'it T TF'17_ f~iivi`IC~•t=U vir~uii~~+t ~.~ ~c;,T1rY ' v IStic., lV .~.Nl. ;4:-r,Ji'r.i'ti~.J i'r ~+ T l L N r-i ~ U '-: ~- ~P< 7t~ii Ful.~t,.~Iti~ ~r:.T~J ,7/Iy/vim '~;'~~~'~1~°.>J i%~~ r,ITivtJSt I~~~~ r, jr;Y vi- JLLY.~ ., ~_ u {=l.t'~~J ~i'viv~IV NtlI~INH~~I '303 '~ 4 ll 'Ib 'allhano~l '%I~au+V {o saols~l~n~l uos~aa ul Alo soOeM Pooa pua a0ey~ao --{oijeua4 Ilnd 'al4eJlsa aaua rosolutisn pureuaM to seegen l n. t.n of the Coda of Vlr0llda, 1990, as amendN, to request ~ the Circuit Court of tM Court tY of Rosnoks to schedule s refsrondum on chen0lnp the method of appointment of members of the Roanoke Roanoke CounYoSChool Board Roanoike County Boerdtof Sue pervlsors. ' Any member of the Public may aDPeer at the time and place aforesaid and address the Bosrd on the matter afore- said. Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney - RoanokgCounty, VA I (265) O~ AOANpy~ ~.~ Z ~ 2 v "a 1$ E50~ $$ SFSQUICEN7ENN~P~ A Beauti~ul Beginning; COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE Mrs. Jane Bryant 4094 Harborwood Road Salem, Virginia 24153 Dear Mrs. Bryant: LEE GARRETT. CHAIRMAN WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT RIGiARD W. ROBERS. VICE-CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT ALICJL1St 17 , 1(~g STEVEN A. MCGRAW CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT This is to advise that at their meeting held on August 9, the Board of Supervisors voted unanimously to appoint you as a member of the Library Board to fill the unexpired four-year term of James M. Miller. This term will expire December 31, 1991. State law provides that any person elected, re-elected, of the appointed or reappointed to any body be furnsserialosedPy We are Freedom of Information Act; your 1987 copy also sending you a copy of the 1987 Conflict of Interest Act. It is necessary that you take an oath of office before the Clerk of the Roanoke County Circuit Court. This oath must be administered rp for to your participation on this Committee. Please phone ndsarranzebtohhavestheeoathladministered208 as soon as possible a g On behalf of the Supervisors and the citizreciationafore County, please accept our sincere thanks and app your willingness to accept this appointment. Very truly yours, mha `~~ ate, ~ C~%..e~--~ Mary H. Allen, Deputy Cle k Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Enclosures cc: Mrs. Elizabeth Stokes George Garretson, Library Director C~n~tnt~ of ~v~tnuk~ BOARD OF SUPERVISORS P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24018-0798 - (703) 772-2004 o~ ROANpk~ 2 G7 ~ ^ p ~ 2 ~~~~~ ~~ ~~~~~ J a 1838 yESO _ 88 ~ SFgQU1CENTENN~P A Beauti/ull3eKimdn~ BOARD OF SUPERVISORS LEE GARRETT. CHAIRMAN WINDSOR HILLS MAGiSTE RIAI_ DtST RICT COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RIC HARD W ROBERS. VICE-CHAIRMAN ELMER C HODGE CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT STEVEN A. MCGRAW 1. Augu S y- (~ 11 , 1 7 p ~ O CATAW'BA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VIN TON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT Mr. James M. Miller 3623 McDaniel Drive Salem, Virginia 24153 Dear Mr. Miller: The Board of Supervisors have asked me to express their sincere appreciation for your previous service to the Library Board. Allow me to personally thank you for the time you served on this Board. Citizens so responsive to the needs of their community and willing to give of themselves and their time are indeed all too scarce. Very truly yours 7YLc~~~ ~ Mary H. A11en, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors bjh PCB E30X 29800 - ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24018 0-798 (703) X72 2004 OF POANp~~ ti ~ Z A a 8~$ .E50 $$ S~SQV~CENTENN~P~' A Benuti~ul [3eRinnink COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE Ms. Mary F. Parker, Clerk Roanoke City Council 215 Church Avenue, S.W. Roanoke, Virginia 24011 Dear Ms. Parker: August 10, 1988 LEE GARRETT. CHAIRMAN WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT RICHARD W. ROBERS. VICE-CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT STEVEN A. MCGRAW CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT Attached is a copy of Resolution No. 8988-5f concerning support for request from Greater Roanoke Transit Company for use of Oil Overcharge Refund for the RADAR/CORTRAN Program. This resolution was adopted by the Board of Supervisors at their meeting on August 9, 1988. If you need further information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, bjh Attachment C~nunf~ of ~n~tnvke BOARD OF SUPERVISORS .~ - Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors PO QOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA '4018 0788 (703) 772-2004 O~ POANO,f-F ~ ,N Z 2 v a 1838 .E50 88 SFSaVICENTENN~P~ fl l3cnuti~ul f3eRirrninK COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR E~MER C. HODGE Ms. Carolyn S. Ross Vinton Town Council 311 Pollard Street Vinton, Virginia 24179 Dear Ms. Ross: LEE GARRETT. CHAIRMAN WIN DS(JR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT RICHARD W. ROBERS. VICE CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L JOHNSON HC~LLINS M4GISTE R.IAL DISTRICT AugUSt l~ , 1988 STEVEN A. MCGRAW CATAW BA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT Attached is a copy of Resolution No. 8988-5f concerning support for request from Greater Roanoke Transit Company for use of Oil Overcharge Refund for the RADAR/COR'rRAN Program. This resolution was adopted by the Board of Supervisors at their meeting on August 9, 1988. If you need further information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, b]h Attachment C~vixn~~ of ~attnnke BOARD OF SUPERVISORS `~ Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors PO. QOX 29800 - ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 2 4018-07 9 8 (703) 772-2004 0~ ROANp~~ ~ h ~. Z J - ~ a 18~ 150 $$ SFSQUICENTENN~P~ A Bcauti~ul Be~inninR COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE August 10, 1988 Ms. Joyce Bailey, Deputy Clerk City of Salem 114 North Broad Street, Salem, Virginia 24153 Dear Ms. Bailey: LEE GARRETT. CHAIRMAN WINDSOR MILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT RICHARD W. ROBERS. VICE CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS M4G ISTERIAL DISTRICT STEVEN A. MCGRAW CATAW BA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT Attached is a copy of Resolution No. 8988-5f concerning support for request from Greater Roanoke Transit Company for use of Oil Overcharge Refund for the RADAR/CORTRAN Program. This resolution was adopted by the Board of Supervisors at their meeting on August 9, 1988. If you need further information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, bjh Attachment ~L1Ltn~1~ II~ ~DMrii~~P BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ~fYL~z~t~c-~ o~ - ~~ Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors PO QOX 29£-300 - RC?ANOKE. VIF2GINIA 240180748 - (703) 772-2004 o~ AOANp~~ a ~ ~. Z z J a i $ $ E50 $a SFSQUICENTENN~P~' A Benuli~ulBeginning COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE August 11, 1988 Mr. William H. Leighty Deputy Secretary of Transportation Secretary of Transportation & Public Safety 613 Ninth Street Office Building Richmond, Virginia 23219 Dear Mr. Leighty: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS LEE GARRETT. CHAIRMAN WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT RICHARD W. ROBERS. VICE-CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT STEVEN A. MCGRAW CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT Attached is a copy of Resolution No. 8988-5f concerning support for request from Greater Roanoke Transit Company for use of Oil Overcharge Refund from the Virginia Department of Transportation for the RADAR/CORTRAN Program. This resolution was adopted by the Board of Supervisors at their meeting on August 9, 1988. If you need further information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, bjh Attachment (~nixn~~ n~ ~n~tnnke Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 2 4018-07 98 (703) 772-2004 OF ROANp~~ ~ w ~ Z Z ~ ~ ~ a ~~~~4 ~~ ~ ~~~~~~~ /x~ 150 0 0 1 V YEA PS 8a `rFgQU1CENTENN~P~' ABeauti~ulBeginning BOARD OF SUPERVISORS LEE GARRETT. CHAIRMAN WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RIC HARD W. BORERS. VICE-CHAIRMAN ELMER C. HODGE CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT Au gust 11 1988 BOB L. JOHNSON ~ HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT STEVEN A. MCGRAW CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VIN TON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT Ms. Christine Driscoll Greater Roanoke Transit Company P. 0. Box 13247 Roanoke, Virginia 24032 Dear Ms. Driscoll: Attached is a copy of Resolution No. 8988-5f concerning support for request from Greater Roanoke Transit Company for use of Oil Overcharge Refund from the Virginia Department of Transportation for the RADAR/CORTRAN Program. This resolution was adopted by the Board of Supervisors at their meeting on August 9, 1988. If you need further information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors bjh Attachment P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24018-0798 (703> 772-2004 OF ROANpy~ ~ ~, L ~. Z J :, a 150 00 18 YEARS $$ SFSQVICENTENN~P~ A Beauti jug Beginning; (~~~tnt,~ n~~ ~n~ttnukr BOARD OF SUPERVISORS COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE AUCJUSt 11, 1988 Mr. Curtis Andrews RADAR/CORTRAN 306 6th Street Roanoke, Virginia 24016 Dear Mr. Andrews: LEE GARRETT. CHAIRMAN WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT RICHARD W. ROBERS. VICE-CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT STEVEN A. MCGRAW CATAW BA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT Attached is a copy of Resolution No. 8988-5f concerning support for request from Greater Roanoke Transit Company for use of Oil Overcharge Refund from the Virginia Department of Transportation for the RADAR/CORTRAN Program. This resolution was adopted by the Board of Supervisors at their meeting on August 9, 1988. If you need further information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors bjh Attachment P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24018-07 9 8 (703) 772-2004 OF ROANp~,~ ti , ~ A . ~' a ~~~~t~11 .~ r' 18 '~°~ 88 SFSOU-ceN7ENN~P~ ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS A Beauri(u/beginning ACTION AGENDA AUGUST 9, 1988 Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meeting. Regular meetings are held on the second Tuesday of the month at 3:00 p.m., and the fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public Hearings will be heard at 7:00 p.m on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.) 1. Roll Call. SAM ABSENT 2. Invocation: The Reverend Steve Harris Baptist Childrens' Home 3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS HCN ADDED ITEM K-6 TO CONSENT AGENDA: RESO OF SUPPORT FOR REQUEST FROM GREATER ROANOKE TRANSIT COMPANY FOR OIL OVERCHARGE REFUND FOR THE ,~ RADAR/CORTRAN PROGRAM C. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS AND AWARDS D. NEW BUSINESS 1. Resolution requesting a referendum of the question of changing the method of selection of members of the County School Board. BLJ/RR TO DELAY TO 8/23/88 URC WITH SAM ABSENT 2. Approval of agreement with Roanoke Electric Steel and appropriation on funds concerning the Dixie Caverns Landfill Cleanup. A-8988-1 BLJ/HCN TO APPROVE " URC WITH SAM ABSENT 3, Approval of a Roanoke County Smoking Policy. HCN/LG TO BRING BACK TO BOARD FOR APPROVAL ON 9/13/88 4. Results of the auction of surplus vehicles and requests to add vehicles to the fleet. A-8988-2 HCN/RR TO AUTHORIZE THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR TO AMEND POLICY TO ALLOW FOR ADDING TWO CAVE SPRING RESCUE VEHICLES AND ONE VEHICLE FOR COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE'S OFFICE. URC WITH SAM ABSENT E. REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS 1. Request for a work session for the proposed street standards. WORK SESSION SET FOR 9/13/88 F. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS G. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance amending Chapter 18 of the Roanoke County Code, Sewers and Sewacre Disposal, concerning the procedures and prescribed fees for issuance of permits for septic tanks and wells. HCN/RR TO APPROVE 1ST READING 2ND READING - 8/23/88 - URC WITH SAM ABSENT H. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance accepting an offer and authorizing the conveyance of a right-of-way and easement to Appalachian Power Company for Green Hill Park. 0-8988-3 2 BLJ/HCN TO APPROVE ORD. URC WITH SAM ABSENT 2. Ordinance accepting an offer and authorizing conveyance of an easement to Appalachian Power Company at the Fire and Rescue Training Center. 0-8988-4 HCN/RR TO APPROVE ORD. URC WITH SAM ABSENT I , APPOINTMENTS 1. Building Code Board of Adjustments and Appeals. 2. Community Corrections Resources Board HCN NOMINATED BERNARD HAIRSTON TO ANOTHER ONE-YEAR TERM- 3, Court Service Unit Advisory Council/Youth and Family Services Advisory Board 4. Grievance Panel 5. Industrial Development Authority BLJ NOMINATED HAROLD RICHARDSON TO REPRESENT HOLLINS DISTRICT TO LANDFILL ADVISORY COMMITTEE J. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS NICKENS (1) ASKED GARDNER SMITH FOR UPDATE ON NEXT PHASE OF AUTOMATED REFUSE - GS ADVISED CONTAINERS WERE NOT AVAILABLE AND THE NEW DELIVERY DATE IS AUG. 12. CONTAINERS WILL TAKE FOUR WEEKS TO DELIVER AND THEN NEXT PHASE WILL BEGIN. (2) ASKED ECH FOR A REPORT ON STATUS OF EMpi,OYEES IN SHERIFF'S DEPT. AS FAR AS WHETHER THEY ARE PART OF PERSONNEL PLAN. (3) SUGGESTED THAT BOARD MEMBERS PARTICIPATE IN HEALTH RISK APPRAISAL ON MAKEUP DATE OF 8/26/88. ROBERSME~~OENTATIVE WOILLHATTENDRNEXTAROANOKEAVALLEY COOPERATION CITY COMMITTEE MEETING. K. CONSENT AGENDA ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE 3 REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY. R-8988-5 BLJ/RR TO APPROVE WITH ADDITION OF ITEM K-6 UVV WITH SAM ABSENT 1. Confirmation of Committee appointment to the Library Board. A-8988-5a 2. Request for acceptance of Woodmont Drive into the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System. R-8988-5b 3. Acquisition of pipeline crossing I-81 and sewer easement through Huffman Estate property. A-8988-5c 4. Acquisition of sewer easement through Harris Estate Property. A-8988-5d 5. Resolution requesting acceptance into the Va. Department of Transportation Secondary System of streets in the Cherokee Hills subdivision. R-8988-5e 6. Resolution supporting request from Greater Roanoke Transit Company for use of the Oil Overcharge Refund for the RADAR/CORTRAN Program. R-8988-5f L. REPORTS RECEIVED AND FILED 1. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance 2. General Fund Unappropriated Balance 3. Board Contingency Fund M. CITIZEN COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS 4 WANDA MANUEL, 4930 BOWER ROAD S. W. SPOKE IN OPPOSITION TO CHANGING METHOD OF SELECTING SCHOOL BOARD MEMBERS N. EXECUTIVE SESSION pursuant to the Code of Virginia Section 2.1-344 (a) (2) to discuss acquisition of real estate. LG/HCN AT 4:00 P.M. URC WITH SAM ABSENT O. ADJOURNMENT TO TOUR THE OLD AND NEW WILLIAM BYRD MIDDLE SCHOOL AT 4:30 P.M. 5 '~ T O~ ROANp~.~ ~ .~' ~ Ir z ~ ,~ °~ a (n~~t~t~ ~ is ~ ~~ ss SFSQUicENTENN~P~' ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS A Bcauti~ul Beginning AGENDA AUGUST 9, 1988 Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meeting. Regular meetings are held on the second Tuesday of the month at 3:00 p.m., and the fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public Hearings will be heard at 7:00 p.m on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.) 1, Roll Call 2. Invocation: gaptRsteChidldrense Homeis 3, Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS C, PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS AND AWARDS D. NEW BUSINESS 1. Resolution requesting a referendum of the question of changing the method of selection of members of the County School Board. 2. Approval of agreement with Roanoke Electric Steel and appropriation on funds concerning the Dixie Caverns Landfill Cleanup. 3, Approval of a Roanoke County Smoking Policy. 4. Results of the auction of surplus vehicles and requests to add vehicles to the fleet. E, REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS 1. Request for a work session for the proposed street standards. F, REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS G. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 1, Ordinance amending Chapter 18 of the Roanoke County Code, Sewers and Sewage Disposal concerning the procedures and prescribed fees for issuance of permits for septic tanks and wells. H, SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance accepting an offer and authorizing the conveyance of a right-of-way and easement to Appalachian Power Company for Green Hill Park. 2. Ordinance accepting an offer and authorizing conveyance of an easement to Appalachian Power Company at the Fire and Rescue Training Center. I , APPOINTMENTS 1, Building Code Board of Adjustments and Appeals. 2, Community Corrections Resources Board 3, Court Service Unit Advisory Council/Youth and Family Services Advisory Board 4, Grievance Panel 5, Industl_ial Development Authority J, REPORTS ANI~ TNQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS K. CONSENT AGENDA 2 ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW-D FROMITHESCONSENT AGENDADAND WILLTBE CONSIDERED REMOVE SEPARATELY. 1, Confirmation of Committee appointment to the Library Board. 2- Request for acceptance of Woodmont Drive into the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System. 3, Acquisition of pipeline crossing I-81 and sewer easem~:a through Huffman Estate property. 4, Acquisition of sewer easement through Harris Estate Property. 5, Resolution requesting acceptance into the Va. Department of Transportation Secondary System of streets in the Cherokee Hills subdivision. I, , REPORT S 1. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance 2, General Fund Unappropriated Balance 3, Board Contingency Fund M. CITIZEN COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS N, EXECUTIVE SESSION pursuant to the Code of Virginia Section 2.1-344 (a) O, ADJOURNMENT 3 C; ~-~z~ s p, p P E A R A N C E R E Q U E S T PUBLIC HEARING ON I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so that I may comment. I agree to follow the guidelines listed below. WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. 1. Each speaker will have between three and five minutes available whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking onthe masoritynof will enforce the rule unless instructed by J the Board to do otherwise. 2. Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. 3, All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. 4. Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times . 5, Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. (, INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEA THORIZATIONG FROMETHERGROUPHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AU ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. P L E A S E W R I T E L E G I B L Y NAME: ADDRESS : ~~~ ~ ~Ot 1,~',`~{ ~ OCl.-~ PHONE : ~ o ` ~~ PLEASE NOTE: (After filling out, give to the Deputy Clerk. Thank you.) ACTION N0. ITEM NUMBER "' AT A REGULAR MEETING OTHEHROANOKE COUNTYEADMINISTRATIONCENTER COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT MEETING DATE: August 9, 1988 Resolution concerning a referendum on changing the AGENDA ITEM• School method of selection of members of the County Board COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: A public hearing for citizen comment was held on this issue on July 26th. At that time, thbeforedthe Boardvfo~ra votelatusly approved bringing this item today's meeting. Supervisor McGraw will be unable to attend today's meeting and has requested that this issue be continued to August 23, 1988• ;~ ~~,~. Mary H. Allen Deputy Clerk E mer C. Hodge County Administrator ------------- ---------------------------------- VOTE ACTION Yes No Abs Approved ( ) Motion by: Garrett Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred T o : __. Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers ACTION # ITEM NUMBER " '~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OFHEHROANOKE COUNTYEADMINISTRATIONNOCENTER COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT T MEETING DATE: August 9, 1988 AGENDA ITEM: Resolution requesting the Circuit Court of Roanoke County to enter an order to hold a referendum on the question of changing the method of selection of members of the 42 of ythehCodeBofrVlrginpa ~ 19a0a in Section 22.1 as amended COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND: On June 14, 1988, the Board of Supervisors adopted a motion ublic hearing to be held on July 26, 1988, concern- calling for a p the Circuit Court to ing the adoption of a resolution requesting uestion of changing enter an order to hold a referendum on the q the method of selection of mechool Boar deSelectionoCommsss~on Board from the Roanoke County S to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors. p, public notice of this public hearing and proposed resolu- 1988, and tion was published in the Roanoke Times on July 12, 1988. The public hearing on this matter was held on July 19, July 26, 1988. If adopted erendum on1NoPember gha1988e Circuit Court would schedule this ref SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: ALTERNATIVES AND IMPACTS: 1. The Board of Supervisors tion calling for a referendum on 2. The Board of Supervisors lution requesting the referendum. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: could adopt the proposed resolu- this question. could refuse to adopt this reso- ~- / Respectfully submitted, '-~~~ ,= Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney ------------ ---------------- VOTE -------------------- ACTION No Yes Abs Approved ( ) Motion by: Garrett Denied ( ) Johnson Received ( ) McGraw Referred Nickens To Robers .~ - / AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARANOKESCOUNTYSADMINISTRATOION COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE RO 1988 CENTER ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 9, RESOLUTION REQUESTING THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ROANOKE COUNTY TO ENTER AN ORDER TO HOLD A REFERENDUM ON THE QUESTION OF CHANGING THE METHOD OF SELECTION AS MEMBERS OF THE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD, PROVIDED IN SECTIO AS2AMENDED OF THE CODE OF VIRGINIA, 1950, WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County ues- determines that it is desirable to hold a referendum on t e q tion of the method of appointment of members of the School Board of Roanoke County, as provided by Section 22.1-42 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended; and, WHEREAS, the Board held a public hearing on the ques- 26 1988 at 7:00 p.m. at the tion of such referendum on July , Roanoke County Administration Center at 3738 Brambleton Avenue, S.W.; and, WHEREAS, said public hearing was advertised in the 1988 and July 19, 1988. Roanoke Times and World News on July 12, NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervi- sors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that said Board does respect- fully request the Circuit Court of Roanoke County to enter an order requiring the regular election officials on the day fixed uali- in such order to open the polls and take the sense of the q the fied voters of Roanoke County on the question of changing method of appointment of members of the Roanoke County School Board from the Roanoke County School Board Selection Commission to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Deputy Clerk of the Board is hereby directed to certify a copy of this resolution and to present it to the judge of the Circuit Court for the County of Roanoke, and to file a certified copy of this resolution with the Clerk of the Circuit Court for the County of Roanoke. ACTION # A-8988-1 ITEM NUMBER ~ ~ 2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE~BOARD COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: August 9, 1988 AGENDA ITEM: DixieFiavAshsCleaaupll Project - Slag/ Y COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS~':/~ ~~~ BACKGROUND: The cleanup of the areas adjacent to the Dixie Caverns landfill is currently in progress. This includes three areas - the sludge pond, the drum area, and the slag/fly ash. The cleanup of the slag/fly ash was delayed reement on costnsha a ng Roanoke Electric Steel could come to an ag for the slag/fly ash cleanup. When the slag/f1Y ash was disposed of in the late 60' Only early 70's, it was not known to 'oe harmful recautionashould be recently has it been determined that extra p used when disposing of this mat he aOe inning of lthislprocess and been very cooperat r ciative of their assistance. Roanoke County is app SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Roanoke County and Roanoke Electri uallelthevdirect costs an agreement whereby they `alltreatmentegmonof lling, and mainte- associated with the cleanup, ree- nance of the area associated with thetheagespective staff of the ment is currently being written 'oy County and Roanoke Electric Steeof'whTch the1Countyasrshare w llfbe the slag/f1Y ash is $800,000 half . STAFF RECOMMENDATION: ~~ Staff recommends that the BoWiahaRoanokeeElectricn Steellwhen trator to execute this agreement complete upon approval as to form by the County Attorney. 400 000 Staff further recommenesCount tseshare of ptherslag/fly gash from fund balance to fund th Y area. -- ~... SUBMITTED BY: C i rd D. Craig V Utility Director APPROVED: ~ ~ E mer C. Hodge County Administrator ---__.__ __ ACTION VOTE No Yes Absent Approved (x) Motion by: Bob I,. Johnson Harry - Garrett x Denied ( ) C. Nickens Johnson x Received ( ) McGraw x Referred Nickens x to Robers x cc: File Cliff Craig John Hubbard Paul Mahoney Don Myers Reta Busher Diane Hyatt '.~"+~ ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETINGTOTHEHROANOKE OCOUNTYEADMINISTRATIONNOCENTER COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD A MEETING DATE: August 9, 1988 AGENDA ITEM• Report on Roanoke County Smoking Policy COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND The Department of Human Resources was requested by the Roanoke County Board of Supervit oe s to develop a smoking policy for county buildings and facil The Department of HumaamRkeosrand non mokersdrepres nting Policy Committee composed of r esentation from the all county buildings and including rep Employee Advisory Committee. The Roanoke County Health De Alive ment, the American Lung Association, and the Roanoke Valley and Well Coalition all provided technical assistance for Was wide policy. The proposed policy development of a county- ~s Office for legal compli- also reviewed by the County Attorney ance. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION ro osed Roanoke County Smoking Policy Attached is the p p Committee. The Department of developed by the Smoking Policy Human Resources requestskBna P licysupervisor's review of the attached Roanoke County Smo g establishes guidelines for smoking in The proposed policy including leased spaces. county-owned buildings and facilities, the attached The Courthousena~h unique characteristics of thesey buildings. policy, based o The proposed policy prohibits smoking in areas such as con- rooms, reception, waiting and counter areas ference and meeting t as indicated. Smoking is also and individual work areas, excep prohibited in medical faci rst and~restrooms msSmoking o sl only lobbies, hallways, elevato permitted in designated smoking areas such asroVadeddsmokeois areas, lounges, lunchrooms and breakrooms, p - distance barriers, minimized through such means as ventilation, between work areas or a°ehalsoecoveredMinhthe proposedppolicy so- lution and enforcement A six-month transition period is recommended fromr gramse in which to conduct employee education p of approval, install no smoking signs, and identify designated smoking areosrams for employees who desire coordinate smoking cessation p g assistance. FISCAL IMPACT It is anticipated that tha bec$10,000 t Thispamount ncould Smoking Policy as proposed woul be charged to the fund bansnanda$9,000cforethelpuOrOChasetof purchase of appropriate sig ventilation and air filtrcot smokeevices and other methods to minimize the effects of tobac STAFF RECOMMENDATION The Board of Supervisors is requested to review the proposed Smoking Policy and offer suggestions. The Board of Supervisors ro osed policy, including the will be requested to approve the p p necessary revisions, in two wIri additoionng countylstaffeisbmoni- Smoking Policy Committee. im lemented City of Roanoke toring progress of the recently P Smoking Policy. SUBMITTED BY: 6 _ ~, ~ o~ . D. Co k Director'of Human Resources APPROVED BY: i" ~~ ~/ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator - ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs Approved Denied Received Referred To Motion by: Garrett Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers `LJ "` ROANOKE COUNTY SMOKING POLICY 1.0 PURPOSE_ This document establishes a policy for County-owned buildings and facilities, including leased space, that will protect the rights of the nonsmokers for an ennar~nomeTOVaaefthoserwhoschooseato smoke,dtheream smoke as possible, a P opportunity to do so. rovide employees and the public with an example of The County plans to p health-promoting behavior, by maintaining an environment as clean an healthful as possible and to reduce the discomfort of employees and the public, whose tolerance for tobacco smoke is limited. It is believed that a spirit of thobgildinnssandnfacolitieslos noormally employees and the public in County g adequate to resolve any dresolvedWhthe rightsaofsthennonsmokeroforyclean Where disputes cannot be air shall be given precedence. 2.0 DEFINITIONS: 2,1 Smoking...Carrying or possessing any lighted tobacco product, to include: cigars, pipes, and cigarettes. 2,2 Designated Smoking Area...Any area within a County facility where smoking is specifically permitted and is situated to allow nonsmoking individuals reasonable opportunity to conduct normal activity in an area as smoke free as possible. 3.0 POLICY: 3.1 Smoking is prohibited in the following areas: 3.1.1 Conference and meeting rooms; reception, waiting, and counter areas; individual work areas, except as indicated in 3.2.1. 3.1.2 Medical facilities or areas where cots may be set up for ill employees. 3.1.3 Classrooms and auditoriums. 3.1.4 Lobbies, hallways, elevators, and restrooms. „~ 3.2 Designated Smoking Areas: 3,2.1 Individual work areas will be designated as "smoking areas" if conditions of the definition "designated smoking area" are met by ventilation, barriersurchasedcb btheeemployee and y areas, air filtering devices, p approved by the supervisor) or other methods to minimize environmental tobacco smoke. 3,2,2 Areas in lounges, lunchrooms, or breakrooms can be "designated smoking areas" as long as criteria in the definition and in paragraph 3.2.1 are met. The County will attempt to provide air filtering devices in those common areas where employees meet for breaks. 3.3 Based on unique characteristics in structure and authority of the Courthouse and County Jail, those buildings are specifically excluded from this policy. It is expected that a clean air policy will be developed in order to provide nonsmoking employees, guests, inmates, and visitors with an environment as free from tobacco smoke as possible. 4,0 RESOLUTION OF DISPUTES AND ENFORCEMENT: rohibited in any work area if any employee who is 4.1 Smoking will be p assigned to that area, or who is a victim of environmental to acco smoke emanating from that work area, registers a confidential complaint to his/her supervisor about smoking, asks that smoki~hebe prohibited, and the validity of the com laint is confirmed by supervisor or department head. 4.2 The supervisor may attempt to resolve the conflict by the methods reviewed in paragraph 3.2.1. 4.3 If the supervisor and employee are unable to come to an acceptable solution, the Smoking Policy Committee will be involved as arbitrator. If those methods are referencesloftthe nonsmoker will environmental tobacco smoke, the p prevail. 4.4 Smoking will be prohibited in previously designated smoking areas in lounges, lunchrooms, or breakrooms if any employee who is a victim of environmental tobacco smoke emanating from that area registers a confidential complarohib~tede andkthe valtdityeofbthe smoking, asks that smoking be p complaint is confirmed by the smoking committee. 4.5 The Smoking Policy Committee will be composed of the committee for the development of a smoking policy. 4.6 Department heads and siperandodecisionssofnthel5mokingmPolIcyting and enforcing this pol y Committee. 2 ~~'. 4.7 Suitable signs furnished and installed by the County, will clearly identify designated "Smoking" and "Nonsmoking" areas. 4,8 This policy will go into effect upon adoption by the Board of Supervisors as County policy. There will be a six (6) month transition period during which the following activities will occur: 4.8.1 Supervisors and department heads will educate their employees on environmental tobacco smoke and the smoking policy through staff meetings, speakers, and other means. 4.8.2 Designated smoking areas will be determined by personnel working in a facility or by a committee seleroediatemsigns smokers and nonsmokers of the facility. App P and air filtering devices will be installed. 4.8.3 Signs prohibiting smoking in areas specified in paragraph 3.1 will be installed. 4.8.4 Employees who desire assistance with smoking cessation or reduction will be provided information about available methods and programs. The specifics of the employee incentives will be addressed and developed through the employee wellness program - "Heart at Work" which will include smoking cessation classes provided by the County. 8-9-88 3 A-8988-2 ~ " -7 ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THROANOKE OCOUNTYEADMINISTRATIONNCENTER COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE MEETING DATE AGENDA ITEM: Results of the auct le to thepfleetvehicles and requests to add vehic COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR' S COMMENTS : _ `~NVM %/~ ~1 BACKGROUND: The County held a public aucnoke Countyp School 1Boasrd lon the City of Salem and the Roa Saturday, July 23. The County sold 34 vehicles at ensesuctTwo and received $25,175 before deducting the aucs aled xbid and the pieces of fire equipment will be sold by p 5 Sheriff following vehicles need to be turned in f urchasedsavehicles (the vehicles as replacement for tui mentyhad not been completed at changing of lights and radio eq p ned to the Clerk of the time of the auction), the vehicle assig ossible use by the Circuit Court, and one vehicle retained for p the Commissioner of the Revenuel f tthese mvehicles o f rom our meals tax program. The remova inventory will bring the tobalthelBoards ofe SupervisorseoncMay compared to the 356 required y 24, 1988. Our office has received the following requests for consideration in the changing of the maximum number °f uadlchas to be included in the fleet. Cave Spring Rescue Sq requested that the County insure 3 of their vehicles in the uads manner that it insuresa~eenothadditionalavehicles tosthe squad, in the County. These them. but a change in the method of insuring The Commissioner of the Revenue has requested a vehicle to the employee administering the meals tax program and be used by hborhoods for the checking of d ~ n ionedhabove,e one rv hicle ewas withheld within the County. As ervisors has had an from the recent auction until the Board of Sup opportunity to act upon this request. The Clerk of the Circuit Court uses the vehicleuiredgbydthe su lies, make deposits as req the office to pick up pP Court, and to attend the various meetings for the office. T e '-' '~ uirement established by the Board of minimum milage req olic is not being met, however the Supervisors in the vehicle p y Clerk requests continued use of the vehicle. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the request of the rescue squad be a roved, that the request of the constitutional offlands the pp the Board of Supervisors, considered individually by fleet be ammended to number of vehicles authorized for the County reflect these changes. Respectfully submitted, ~~ ~ ~- ~7 clirj~-,.x - ~"John M. Chambli s, Jr Assistant Administrator Approved by, Elmer C. Ho ge County Administrator --------------- VOTE ----------------------- ACTION No Yes Absent Motion by: uatt r?i~kPns/Richard x Approved (x) i~P Coun~~ Garrett Denied ( ) i~T Roi~ _t s T~ a??thor - Johnson x ,-Q or to amend po1~~ x Received ( ) r~nq _ McGraw Referred '~^_ ~~~ ^~~ thYeP C'ave~-- x o fnr the Nickens To RP4C' '-ic-leG an °ri bers x of RPVP_r.11° for meal~9 ;ccinnPr - tax and decals JMC~cw Attachments cc: File John Chambliss Tommy Fuqua Wayne Compton Elizabeth Stokes ACTION # ATYA VIRGINIA HELDNATOTHEHROANORE COUN , ITEM NUMBER ~_=l OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: August 9, 1988 AGENDA ITEM: Request for a work session for the proposed street standards. COUNTY ADMINISTR OR'S COMMENTS: ~.c~-~ O~y~~ BACKGROUND: a committee, composed of members Since August 1986 ~ Homebuilders Association, Blue representing the Roanoke Valleecifications, area surveyors and Ridge Chapter Construction SP on different components of the County Staff, have been working Design Construction Manual. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: After five drafts, eight committee meetings, two reviews by Homebuilders, the the Executive Committee of theresentkto theeBoard of Supervisors County staff would like to p the second component of thstDeetgParking DesigncStanda ds and entitled "Streets and Off Specifications. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends a proposed street standards, BMITTED BY: work session be held 8/23 to discuss the Arnold Covey\ Director of Developme`t and Inspections APPROVED: Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ..... ------ ------------------ y_.______________ ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs Approved ( ) Motion by: Garrett Denied ( ~ Johnson Received ( ) McGraw Referred Nickens to Robers ACTION # ITEM NUMBER '" AT A REGULARAMEELDNATOTHEHROAONOKE OCOUNTYEADMINISTRATIONNOCENTER COUNTY, VIRGINI MEETING DATE: August 9, 1988 AGENDA ITEM: Proposed Change to the County Ordinance Concerning the Collection of Fees for Septic Tanks and Private Wells. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND: On June 23, 1987, the Board of Supervisors approved an ordinance allowing Roanoke County to regulate the installation of septic tanks by requiring any person desiring to install a septic tank to secure a permit at a cost of $50. When the General Assembly passed House Bill 418 at its 1988 session which authorizes the State Board of Health to establish fees for applications for permits tothe State tBoardlof Health disposal systems and private wells, approved a $50 fee for filing an application for an on-sian sewage disposal system permit and a $25 fee fO ermitingboth application for a private well construction p , effective on July 1, 1988. On July 26, 1988, the Board decided to retain the County's septic tank permit fee and have the County Treasurer collect both the County and State feeAs f Welbot the pBoarda requested) th t wthe construction permits. staff develop a process by which a County resident could complete the application and fee process in one location. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: County staff met with the local Health Department staff and made arrangements for the application for both the septic tank and private well construction permits to be made to the County's Department of Development and Inspection and that collection of the permit fees be made by the County Treasurer at the time application is made for a permit and before the application will be processed by the Health Department. These procedure changes require an amendment d ord na~ cetyis o attached forstthe d Boardnd reading. The revise review. .~ / ALTERNATIVES AND IMPACTS: Staff recommends a first reading of the revised ordinance on August 9, 1988 and approval of the revised ordinance after the second reading on August 23, 1988. Approved by, Respectfully submitted, A ~ ~'~C~,GJ,n Lp ~ Elmer C. Hodg Reta R. Busher, Director County Administrator of Management and Budget ----------- ----------------- VOTE ACTION No Yes Abs Approved ( ) Motion by: -- Garrett Denied ( ) Johnson Received ( ) McGraw Referred Nickens To Robers AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE,ROANOKE COUN988ADMINISTRATION CENTER, ON TUESDAY AUGUST 9, ~ ~ / ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 18 OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE, SEWERS AND SEWAGE DISPOSAL, CONCERNING 'THE PROCEDURES AND PRESCRIBED FEES. FOR ISSUANCE OF PERMITS FOR SEPTIC TANKS AND WELLS WHEREAS, by ordinance adopted on June 23, 1987, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, amended Chapter 18, Sewers and Sewage Dis osal, to require that any person desir- ing to install a septic tank secure a permit to do so and pre- scribed reasonable fees for the issuance of such permits; and WHEREAS, legislation adopted by the 1988 session of the General Assembly, Acts of the Assembly 1988 Session, Chapter 203 (House Bill 418), authorized the Board of Health to establish fees for applications for permits to construct on-site sewage disposal systems, not to exceed Fifty Dollars ($50), and private wells, not to exceed Twenty-five Dollars ($25); and WHEREAS, the State Board of Health meeting on May 10, 1988, has adopted emergency regulations to implement a fee system for applications for permits for both on-site sewage disposal systems and private well construction effective July 1, 1988; and WHEREAS, it is necessary for the County to modify its procedures to achieve coordination between the County and the Department of Health as to the processing of application for and payment of both County and State permit fees for on-site sewage disposal systems and state permit fees for private well construc- tion. 1 -/ BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that Chapter 18, Sewers and Sewage Disposal, of the Roanoke County Code be, it hereby is, amended to read and provide as follows: 1. All building in the County in those areas where septic tanks are permitted shall have an on-site sewage disposal system or septic tanks installed for the disposing of sewage and other human waste. 2. Before any on-site sewage disposal or septic tank systems or private wells are constructed or installed, it shall be the duty of the landowner upon whose land the construction or installation ~s- to shall take place to secure a permit €~ex~ to be issued by the Health Department. Application for such ermit(s) shall be made to the Count 's De artment of Devel- o ment and Inspection, or its successor, upon forms prescribed by the Health Department. 3. There is hereby established a Count permit fee of fifty dollars ($50.00) for each on site sewage disposal system or septic tank. This permit fee, along with the state permit fee of fifty dollars ($50.00)_ shall be paid to the Treasurer at the time a lication is made for a ermit and before the a lication will be rocessed b the Health De artment. The state ermit fee of twent -five dollars ($25.00) for construction of a rivate well likewise shall be aid to the Treasurer at the time a lication is made for such ermit and before rocessin b the Health Department. The Treasurer shall not collect the state fee(s) 2 `" 1 from owner's whose family income is at or below the applicable Income Guidelines as provided under state regulation. 4. The Health Department shall review this permit request application based upon the requirements and regula- tions promulgated pursuant to Title 32.1 of the Code of Virginia. Any septic tank permit issued under this section shall be valid for a period of fifty-four (54) months from the date of issuance unless there has been a substantial, intervening change in the soil or site conditions where the septic system is to be located. The availability of a public sewer system shall constitute a sub- stantial intervening change in the site conditions to void a per- mit. 5. In the event the Health Department denies a permit on the land on which the owner seek to construct his principal place of residence, the county's portion of the state application fee shall be refunded to the owner. Such fee shall not be re- funded by the County until final resolution by the Health Depart- ment of an a eals made b the owner from such denial. 6. A lications shall be limited to one site specific ro osal When site conditions change, or the needs of the a pli- cant chan e or the a licant ro oses and re nests another site be evaluated, and a new site evaluation is conducted, a new appli- cation and fee is required. 7. Any person, firm, or corporation violating any pro- visions of this ordinance shall be subject to a Class 3 misdemean- or for each offense; and a separate offense shall be deemed com- mitted on each day during or on which a violation occurs or con- 3 . ~ "`. , tinues. Further, any violation or attempted violation of this ordinance may be restrained, corrected, or abated by injunction or other appropriate proceeding. g. The effective date of this ordinance shall be September 1, 1988. 4 AT A REGULAR MEETING OFATHTHEOROANOKESCOUNTYSADMINISTRATOION COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD 1988 CENTER, ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 9, ORDINANCE $988-3 ACCEPTING AN OFFER AND AUTHOTI OF GWAYEANDN EASEMENTOFTO RIGH APPALACHIAN POWER COMPANY BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.01 of the Charter of Roanoke County, the subject property has been de- clared to be surplus and is being made available for other public uses, i.e. utility easement; and 2, That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading concerning the disposition of the subject property was held on July 26, 1988; a 1888; and second reading was held on August 9, 3, That 'the right-of-way and easement are located on roperty owned by Roanoke County in the Catawba Magisterial Dis- P trict located off of Route 639 at Green Hill Park; and 4. That the offer of Appalachian Power Company in the amount of $1.00 is hereby accepted and all other offers are re- jected; and 5, That the proceeds from the sale of the right-of-way and easement are to be allocated to the capital reserves of Roa- poke County; and 6. That the County Administrator is authorized to exe- cute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County as are necessary to accomplish the conveyance of said pro- perty, all of which shall be upon form approved by the County Attorney. On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor Nickens, and upon the following recorded vote: AYES• Supervisors Johnson, Nickens, Robers, Garrett NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor McGraw A COPY - TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File En ineering Phillip T. Henry, Director, g John R. Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney John D. Willey, Director, Real Estate Assessment 2 ACTION # ITEM NUMBER /7 "' ` AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THROANOKE OCOUNTYEADMIONISTRATIONNCENTER COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE MEETING DATE: August 9, 1988 AGENDA ITEM: Accepting an offer and authorizing the coalachian of a right-off-way and easement to App Power Company COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: APCo) has requested that the Appalachian Power Company County of Roanoke convey a r fight-ll indemn of y aand wave f thef Co~nty 639 at Green Hill ParlossAorodamage from its negligence in oper harmless against any and easement. ating its facilities installed in the right-of-way Pursuant to Section 18.04 ° dis ositione of ftheahereinafter~ a first reading concerning the p described easement was held on July 26, 1988; a second reading will be held on August 9, 1988. ALTERNATIVES AND IMPACTS: aid to Roanoke County from Appalachian Power Company $1.00 p STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Cou Ice sachn act ions on b half zod to execute such documents and to Roanoke County as are necessary to ne comopri 1 form happroved abye the said property, all of which steal P County Attorney. Respectfully submitted, ~_ P ul M. Mahoney County Attorney x -------------- ------------- VOTE ACTION No yes Abs Approved ( ) Motion by: Garrett Denied ( ) Johnson Received ( ) McGraw Referred Nickens To Robers ,y_ ~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGICENTERELONATUESDAROANAOGUSTO9NT1988MINISTRATION ORDINANCE/ACCEPTING AN OFFER AND AUTHO- RIZING THE CONVEYANCE OF A RIGHT-OF-WAY AND EASEMENT TO APPALACHIAN POWER COM- PANY BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.01 of the Charter of Roanoke County, the subject property has been de- clared to be surplus and is being made available for other public uses, i.e. utility easement; and 2. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading concerning the disposition of the subject property was held on July 26, 1988; a second reading was held on August 9, 1988; and 3. That the right-of-way and easement are located on property owned by Roanoke County in the Catawba Magisterial Dis- trict located off of Route 639 at Green Hill Park; and 4. That the offer of Appalachian Power Company in the amount of $1.00 is hereby accepted and all other offers are re- jected; and 5. That the proceeds from the sale of the right-of-way and easement are to be allocated to the capital reserves of Roa- noke County; and (. That the County Administrator is authorized to exe- cute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County as are necessary to accomplish the conveyance of said pro- perty, all of which shall be upon form approved by the County Attorney. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY.,;ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 9, 1988 ORDINANCE 8988-4 ACCEPTING AN OFFER AND AUTHORIZING THE CONVEYANCE OF AN EASEMENT TO APPALACHIAN POWER COMPANY AT THE FIRE AND RESCUE TRAINING CENTER BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.01 of the Charter of Roanoke County, the subject property has been de- Glared to be surplus and is being made available for other public uses, i.e. utility easement; and 2. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading concerning the disposition of the subject property was held on July 26, 1988; a second reading was held on August 9, 1988; and 3. That the easement is located on property owned by Roanoke County in the Catawba Magisterial District located on the westerly side of Virginia Secondary Highway 630 (Kessler Mill Road), Roanoke County Public Service Center; and 4. That the offer of Appalachian Power Company in the amount of $1.00 is hereby accepted and all other offers are re- jected; and 5. That the proceeds from the sale of the easement are to be allocated to the capital reserves of Roanoke County; and 6. That the County Administrator is authorized to exe- cute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County as are necessary to accomplish the conveyance of said pro- perty, all of which shall be upon form approved by the County Attorney. On motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by Supervisor Robers, and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Nickens, Robers, Garrett NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor McGraw A COPY - TESTE: Mary H. Al en, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Phillip T. Henry, Director, Engineering John R. Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney John R. Willey, Director, Real Estate Assessment Tommy Fuqua, Director, Fire & Rescue 2 ITEM NUMBER ~ '. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: August 9, 1988 AGENDA ITEM: Easement for APCO at the Fire and Rescue Training Center COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND: The Board of Supervisors approved the concept of a regional fire and rescue training center at the Public Service Center in June of 1985. The Fire and Rescue Department has been able to move forward with this program and has completed phase I of the Center. Phase I included the construction of a 2 1/2 story burn building. Phase II of the project has just begun. This phase includes all site work and improvements. One section of this phase includes providing complete electrical service and lighting for the site. In order for APCO to provide this utility, an easement is required. This easement will allow APCO to construct and maintain the electrical service lines into the Fire and Rescue Training Center. ALTERNATIVES AND IMPACTS: 1. Approve the easement for APCO to provide and maintain electrical service to the Fire and Rescue Training Center. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The first reading was held on July 26, 1988. Staff recommends approval following the second reading. SUBMITTED BY: ap ain M. W. Lig t Training Officer APPROVED: Elmer C. Hodg , Jr.J~ County Administrator ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: ______ _____. No Yes Abs Denied ( ) _~~______ _._._______ Garrett ___ Received ( ) _______ _____ ___._, Johnson ~_ ___ Referred ___~_--__-- -___~___ McGraw ___ _-- -__ To ,'.+ _ ___ _._________._______ Nickens ~_ ____ Robers k AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 9, 1988 ORDINANCE ACCEPTING AN OFFER AND AUTHO- RIZING THE CONVEYANCE OF AN EASEMENT TO APPALACHIAN POWER COMPANY AT THE FIRE AND RESCUE TRAINING CENTER BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.01 of the Charter of Roanoke County, the subject property has been de- clared to be surplus and is being made available for other public uses, i.e. utility easement; and 2. That pursuant to the provision: of Section 18.04 of the Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading concerning the disposition of the subject property was held on July 26, 1988; a second reading was held on August 9, 1988; and 3. That the easement is located on property owned by Roanoke County in the Catawba Magisterial District located on the westerly side of Virginia Secondary Highway 630 (Kessler Mill Road), Roanoke County Public Service Center; and 4. That the offer of Appalachian Power Company in the amount of $1.00 is hereby accepted and all other offers are re- jected; and 5. That the proceeds from the sale of the easement are to be allocated to the capital reserves of Roanoke County; and 6. That the County Administrator is authorized to exe- cute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County as are necessary to accomplish the conveyance of said pro- perty, all of which shall be upon form approved by the County Attorney. Y ~~ ~ 1 ACTION NUMBER ITEM NUMBE{=. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: August 9, 1988 SUBJECT: Appointments to Committees, Commissions and Boards COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: 1 Building Code Board of Adjustments and Appeals Four-year term of Norman Eugene Jarrett, Hollins Magisterial District. His term expired January 22, 1988. 2 Community Corrections Resources Board One-year terms of of Bernard Hairston and Edmund J. Kielty, Alternate. Their terms expire August 13, 1988. 3 Court Service Unit Advisory Council/Youth and Familv Services Advisory Board• One-year term of youth member Emily Reaser, Northside High School. Her term expired November 13, 1987. Two-year terms of Marilyn Morehead, Hollins District; Dr. J. Andrew Archer, Vinton District; and Sherry Robison, Windsor Hills District expired 3/22/88. One-year term of Tracy Rothschild, youth member from Cave Spring, expired 3/22/88. APPOINTMENTS TO THIS COMMITTEE HAVE BEEN POSTPONED UNTIL IT IS REACTIVATED. Grievance Panel Two-year term of Thomas T. Palmer will expire September 10, 1988. Industrial Development Authority Four-year term of Thomas D. Isenhart, Catawba Magisterial District will expire September 26, 1988. Mr. Isenhart will be moving to Seattle, Washington in August and may not be reappointed (See attached letter). ~~ SUBMITTED BY: ~~ Mary H. Allen Deputy Clerk Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred To: ACTION Motion by: _ APPROVED Y: Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator VOTE Yes No Abs Garrett Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers ~~ ~ BUILDING CODE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS .AND APPEALS A. COMPOSITION: To be comprised of five (5) members; ::appointed by the Board of Supervisors. Members may be reappointed, and terms should be staggered so that less than half of the terms expire in any one year. The Board of Supervisors may appoint alternate members who may sit on the Board in the absence of any regular members, and shall have the full power and authority of the regular member. Board members shall be selected on the basis of their ability to render fair and competent decisions- regarding application of the code, and•shall to the extent possible, represent different ~~•occupational or professional .fields. At least one member should be an experienced builder. At least one member should be a licensed professional engineer or architect. B. DUTIES- . Shall act on application for appeals as required by Section 36-105 of the Code of Virginia; or it shall enter into an agreement with the governing body of another county or municipality or with some other agency, or a State agency approved by the Virginia Department of Housing and Community Development. C. MEETING SCHEDULE: The Board shall meet upon notice of the chairman or at stated periodic meetings if warranted by the volume of work. The Board shall meet within ten working days of the filing of an appeal. " .~ COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS RESOURCES BOARD A. COMPOSITION: (From Bylaws and Section 53.1-183) To consist of seven members appointed as follows: one member from Roanoke County; one member from Salem City; three members from the judges in the 23rd Judicial District; one member from the Department of Corrections. The term of office shall be determined by the appointing authority (Roanoke County's is one year . ) B. DUTIES• Review•felony referrals from the Circuit Courts of Roanoke City, Roanoke County and the City of Salem for possible diversion from state penal system and local jails. C. MEETINGS: Third Tuesday of each month~at 4:00 p.m. .~ ..~ ""° COURT SERVICES UNIT ADVISORY COUNCIL/YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES ADVISORY BOARD A. COMPOSITION Board to consist of two members from each magisterial district, and one youth member from each high school. Governing bodies of each county and city served by a"court service unit may appoint one or more members to a citizen advisory council. B. DUTIES: Advises and cooperates with the court upon all matters affecting the working of this law and other laws•:relating to children, their care and protection and to domestic relations; Consults and confer with the court and director of the court service unit relative to the development and extension of •the court service program; -- Encourage the members selected by the council to serve on the central advisory. council to visit as often as the member conveniently•can, institutions and associations receiving children under this law and to report to the court the conditions and surroundings of the children received by or in charge of any such persons, institutions or associations. The Council should make themselves familiar with the work of the court. Makes an annual report to the court and the participating governing bodies on the work of the council. Rs the Youth and Family Services Advisory Board: Establish goals and priorities for County-wide youth services; assist in coordination and plannipg for comprehensive youth services within the private sector. Serve in an advisory capacity and to otherwise assist the Board of Supervisors to establish goals and objectives in compliance with all "minimum Standards of the Delinquency Prevention and Youth Development Act of 1979". Assist in conducting an assessment of the needs of youth every five years and to assist in~-developing an annual Delinquency Prevention Plan, further to participate in evaluating the implementation of the plan and making a report thereon tb the Board of Supervisors. Provide a public forum where concerns about youth may be expressed and to receive recommendations and raise concerns of ..public and private organizations at any regular { advisory board meeting upon proper notice. Advocates necessary legislative ainendme~nts to improve community conditions for youth - development and to support the development of needed services both public and private for youth in the community. C. MEETING SCHEDULE: One a quarter, the third Tuesday, beginning January; time and place determined at meetings. -~~= y GRIEVANCE PANEL A. COMPOSITION To consist of three (3) members, appointed by the Board of Supervisors; for terms of two years. B. DUTIES The panel shall adopt such rules and procedures as it deems necessary and desirable. The panel has the responsibility to rule on the interpretation, application, and meaning of the County's personnel policies, rules and regulations.. The panel shall select for each hearing a panel chairman, set a time for the hearing which shall be held as soon as practical, but no later than fifteen (15) full working days after the grievant appeal.. C. MEETING SCHEDULE The County Administrator shall arrange a hearing with the panel members to hear the grievance. ;, ~~ }°"r \.y.: INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY A. COMPOSITION: (Summarized from State Code 15.1.1377) To be composed of seven (7) directors, appointed by the Board of Supervisors; for terms of four (4) years, except appointments to fill vacancies which shall be for the unexpired terms . B, DUTIES• Has authority to sue or be sued and to prosecute and defend at law or in equity in any court having jurisdiction of the subject matter and of the parties. Adopted and use a corporate seal; Contract and be contracted with; Acquire, improve and maintain and equip and furnish one or more authority facilities including all real and personal properties which the .board of directors of the authority may deem necessary in connection therewith and regardless of whether or not any such facilities shall then be in existence; To lease to others any or all of its facilities and to charge and collect rent therefore; To issue its bonds for the purpose of carrying out any of its powers including specifically any power conferred. To appoint an industrial advisory committee to advise the. authority; To borrow money and to accept contributions, grants, and other financial assistance from the United States of America and agencies or instrumentalities thereof, the Commonwealth or any political subdivision, agency or public instrumentality of the Commonwealth for or in aid of the construction, acquisition, ownership, maintenance or repair of the authority facilities. C. MEETING SCHEDULE: Called meetings. ,,~. ~) ~.i 'THOMAS U. [SF.NHAItT MANAURR _, r, , ~; , ~ , ~ ~J'J ~._ Sr1,SH K DOOR COMPANY iH09 \V EST CAMPRELI. AVF,N(1F P. O. ROX 2020 , ROANOKF„~VIRGIN[A 240(19 (703) 144-6201 July 28,1988 Mr. Steve McGraw Roanoke County Administration Office 3738 Brambleton Avenue Roanoke, Virginia 24018 Dear Steve, ~_ My family and I are being transferred to Seattle, Washington, in August. You will need to replace me on the Industrial Development Authority. Steve, I have enjoyed knowing you. You have done very positive things for the county. I wish you and your family health and success. Sincerely, Thomas D. Isenhart kn/TI f ~. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 9, 1988 RESOLUTION N0. 8988-5 APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM k - CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That that certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for August 9, 1988, designated as Item K - Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 5, inclusive, as follows: 1. Confirmation of Committee appointment to the Library Board. 2. Request for acceptance of Woodmont Drive into the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System. 3. Acquisition of pipeline crossing I-81 and sewer easement through Huffman Estate property. 4. Acquisition of sewer easement through Harris Estate Property. 5. Resolution requesting acceptance into the Va. Department of Transportation Secondary System of streets in the Cherokee Hills subdivision. 6. Resolution supporting request from Greater Roanoke Transit Company for use of the Oil Overcharge Refu~~d for the RADAR/CORTRAN Program. 2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this resolution. ~ ~ -- 1 On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor Robers, and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor McGraw A COPY - TESTE: `~.Qh.~~, ~/ Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors 8/10/88 cc: File Phillip Henry, Director of Engineering Clifford Craig, Director of Utility Department John Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator 1 __ ~ f~' / AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 9, 1988 RESOLUTION N0. APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM k - CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That that certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for August 9, 1988, designated as Item K - Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 5, inclusive, as follows: 1. Confirmation of Committee appointment to the Library Board. 2. Request for acceptance of Woodmont Drive into the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System. 3. Acquisition of pipeline crossing I-81 and sewer easement through Huffman Estate property. 4. Acquisition of sewer easement through Harris Estate Property. 5. Resolution requesting acceptance into the Va. Department of Transportation Secondary System of streets in the Cherokee Hills subdivision. 2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this resolution. A-8988-5.a ITEM NUMBER=~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE August 9, 1988 SUBJECT: Confirmation of Committee Appointments COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The following nominations were made at the previous board meeting and must now be confirmed by the Board of Supervisors. The nominee has agreed to serve. Library Board Jane Bryant has been nominated by Supervisor McGraw to serve the four-year unexpired term-year term of James Miller, Catawba Magisterial District. The term will expire on December 31, 1991. SUBMITTED BY: _J~c% Mary H. Allen Deputy Clerk APPROVED BY: /k~/ A7 Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved (x) Motion by: $nh r,_ .TnhnGnn f Ri ~harr7 Yes NO Abs erit Denied ( ) H7_ Rn~jarg Garrett x Received ( ) Johnson x Referred _ McGraw x To• _ Nickens x Robers x cc: File Library Board File l AMENDED AT THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 9, 1988 RESOLUTION 8988-5.b REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF WOODMONT DRIVE, FROM ITS INTERSECTION WITH CAVE SPRING LANE TO ITS TERMINUS AT THE CUL-DE-SAC, INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That this matter came this day to be heard upon the proceedings herein, and upon the application of James H. Buckland and Lloyd G. Lazarus that Woodmont Drive be accepted and made a part of the Secondary System of State Highways under Section 33.1-229 of the Virginia State Code. 2. That it appears to the Board that drainage easements and a f i f ty ( 50 ) foot right-of -way for said road have been dedicated by virtue of a certain map/maps known as Woodmont Manor, Section 3 Subdivision which map was recorded in Plat Book 10, Page 59, of the records of the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, on May 11, 1987, and Woodmont Manor, recorded in Plat Book 6, Page 87, on May 12, 1967, and that by reason of_ the recordation of said maps no report from a Board of Viewers, nor consent or donation of right-of-way from the abutting property owners is necessary. The Board hereby guarantees said right-of-way for drainage. 3. That said road known as Woodmont Drive and which is shown on a certain sketch accompanying this Resolution, be, and the same is hereby established as public road to become a part of the State Secondary System of Highways in Roanoke County, only from and after notification of official acceptance of said street or highway by the Virginia Department of Transportation. On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor Robers, and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Nickens, Robers, Garrett NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor McCraw A COPY - TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Phillip T. Henry, Director, Engineering Arnold Covey, Director, Development & Inspections, and Copy for Virginia Department of Transportation 2 AT THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 9, 1988 RESOLUTION 8988-5.b REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF WOODMONT DRIVE, FROM ITS INTERSECTION WITH CAVE SPRING LANE TO ITS TERMINUS AT THE CUL-DE-SAC, INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That this matter came this day to be heard upon the proceedings herein, and upon the application of James H. Buckland and Lloyd G. Lazarus that Woodmont Drive be accepted and made a part of the Secondary System of State Highways under Section 33.1-229 of the Virginia State Code. 2. That it appears to the Board that drainage easements and a fifty (50) foot right-of-way for said road have been dedicated by virtue of a certain map/maps known as Woodmont Manor, Section 3 Subdivision which map was recorded in Plat Book 10, Page 59, of the records of the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, on May 11, 1987 and that by reason of the recordation of said map no report from a Board of Viewers, nor consent or donation of right-of-way from the abutting property owners is necessary. The Board hereby guarantees said right-of-way for drainage. 3. That said road known as Woodmont Drive and which is shown on a certain sketch accompanying this Resolution, be, and the same is hereby established as public road to become a part of the State Secondary System of Highways in Roanoke County, only from and after notification of official acceptance of sai street or hi hwa g• p d g y by the Vir lnia De artment of Transportation. On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor Robers, and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Nickens Robers, Garrett NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor MaCraw A COPY - TESTE: Q.~L--cam,-• ~~ i'~ary H. Allen Deputy Clerk cc• File Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Phillip T. Henry, Director, Engineering Arnold Covey, Director, Development & Inspections, and Copy for Virginia Department of Transportation 2 ITEM NUMBER~•~r AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: August 9, 1988 SUBJECT: Acceptance of Woodmont Drive into the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: James H. Buckland and Lloyd G. Lazarus, the developers of Woodmont Manor, Section 3, request that the Board of Supervisors approve a resolution to the Virginia Department of Transportafrom requesting that they accept 0.08 miles of Woodmont Drive, its intersection with Cave Spring Lane to its terminus at the cul-de-sac. The staff has inspected this road along with representatives of the Virginia Department of Transportation and find the road is acceptable. FISCAL IMPACT: No County funding is required. RECOMMENDATIONS: The staff recommends that the Board approve a resolution to the Virginia Department of Transportation requesting that they accept Woodmorminusvat themculSdensacsintoothe1SecondarypRoad Lane to its to System. SUBMITTED BY: ~~. Phillip T. Henry, P.E Director of Engineering APPROVED: Elmer C. Hod e County Administrator ------------- -------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Garrett Received ( ) Referred to Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers 2 ~ a° ..~ w,~ \' ~.~, ~`A.,r ~ ,`-' ""'~ ~-`~ f4~ F'.",: ~. r`Nr +~ ~ ~ C~ Imo'' a p~ c,.~~ J CASTt£TiOCK FM S"` F'POi'117cfi0~~r.E i~ /~~W.v~ ~yJ/'~~ ,{- J ~) 1~..+.~r w,N. s. / ~ JCAOp - __- ~. ~ CV~LSTN'~N.~ PA.Z ~Cf \":Co ~ f TA (' -. ./ GRCCR 9'S NR ~. i.(ti.a TON .~ ~ ~ ~~ GA.~ GPp ~ac,,,~ /4N~HIGTS aMC= c s~ ..c iY\.r.vr s ~„ ~,y~jp~~ T..R ~+ ~ ~ ~ \ ~~4, ~ WAFILLS ~ ~.. riy,°' ;:.F s, w. - ~ .:~. `. yro n,p _ r.+~ .~ ~cw ,?J~J,f,~r c.a~15 ~~;i6G? ETON MILL .JOa •\ao.- ~~ .,. `moo Da 'NO t~ LS'.~{ ~1~ / ?Zl .. ~~~i+o kzaG~>* ~~ inn` J . ~wwTra ,, 4 ~.,p 1 / a / ~ s,••• 710 \~ 1lTDON FARMS~~ ~; / ~~ i. ~~9j ///~~~ r i I ~ ~t'CS/,' ~'~ ~ o° ~ 1 ~„ ~~~ ;.a '; 090 :' ~ j (~erui ` . ~rO4crM1•~• ,~~~ 4 ~ ~` 154`, / ~ ~Gg' ~,,:"i.\ ? e ~°'- NORTH `~ ~~ ~ VICINITY MAP !,~~'% E13 ~, ~ ~~~ PROPOSED ADDITION SHOWN IN YELLOW "`S' DESCRIPTION ., + 1.7 1) WOODMONT DRIVE FROM THE // INTERSECTION OF CAVE SPRING "" :~ Q,c+ LANE (RT 1573) TO THE DEAD ,~.,~ ,, '~~ END . 1 1.9 I5 ~q z•p~ '~ >~ LENGTH : 1) . 08 MILES 1 ~ ,>~° `~~ : $ t +110 , RIGHT OF WAY : 1) 50 FEET 9.54 Ac ( I.a = '- t ~,• ROADWAY WIDTH : 1) 31 FEET l J it o 1.1 SURFACE WIDTH : 1) 26 FEET `~ SERVICE: 1) 4 HOMES 1.3 /`.,~ = - IMPROVEMENT NECESSARY: mot` ~ RECOMMENDATION: u 12 ~ 4 ~_, y 1 bs ~ r G z•7.3A 21 O 3.57Ac \ ti.r~ 23 ~rz•s Z Rrn ram ~ ^r .~~... _ ~ z?> r a /~~ W 4 s 24 ~ ~P ~ ~~fry2 ~ , ss S ti ~~ ~ ~ 2° i ~ ,~. a D'z' a~ K ~ ~ 25 '~,~ a 34 z~ 3 ~. r O 32 v ~~ ~ ~s 19 ~8 er g ~ y, c ~t .~ 31 ~ T' ~ ~ ~ 2r ~ 3o e ss F a '~ 1 cs o _~ ~ a .~+r 4• ~~ l ~ ~ ` • goo jO r~ ^ G~~ ao~ CH~ •~ 22 ~ i 'V ~ 4 ~ ` ~ ~ \~'• \L' ~ O ~ 3$ { I ~ ~ ~' ~1\ ,, ~b - ~ I ` ~CO d'311 I "a µ ST~wa ~~ iec orb \$. /re s~sa' ~ '° ~ { ~ ~~+ ~..a is p Ibp F ,Q 1~ w~~ N f ~ 1514" c°'" ~ 7 42 41 ~~ ~~ - e ~ 1 .• R 8 •cus ~~ e ~ 42 43 ~ O Y,° 'o ~ws no ~ ~ r i • d, n /~ /e3.H L'J(192 wAT [S.Nb 24 .R ~^ ~ - - ~ COMMUNITY SERVICES Acceptance of Woodmont Drive & DEVELOPMENT 3 _ AT THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION ~~ CENTER ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 9, 1988 RESOLUTION REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF WOODMONT DRIVE, FROM ITS INTERSECTION WITH CAVE SPRING LANE TO ITS TERMINUS AT THE CUL-DE-SAC, INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That this matter came this day to be heard upon the proceedings herein, and upon the application of James H. Buckland and Lloyd G. Lazarus that Woodmont Drive be accepted and made a part of the Secondary System of State Highways under Section 33.1-229 of the Virginia State Code. 2. That it appears to the Board that drainage easements and a fifty (50) foot right-of-way for said road have been dedicated by virtue of a certain map/maps known as Woodmont Manor, Section 3 Subdivision which map was recorded in Plat Book 10, Page 59, of the records of the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, on May 11, 1987 and that by reason of the recordation of said map no report from a Board of Viewers, nor consent or donation of right-of-way from the abutting property owners is necessary. The Board hereby guarantees said right-of-way for drainage. 3. That said road known as Woodmont Drive and which is shown on a certain sketch accompanying this Resolution, be, and the same is hereby established as public road to become a part of the State Secondary System of Highways in Roanoke County, only from and after notification of official acceptance of said street or highway by the Virginia Department of Transportation. 4 { ACTION # A-8988-5.c AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANORE MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: August 9, 1988 Acquisition of sewer easement COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND: and property The Board of Supervisors has participation in the construction of apsewerulineapromvMontclair Estates to the new APCO Service Center. At the July 26, 1988, meeting, the County staff requested that the Board of Supervisors schedule a acquisition of the easements required fore Ybisicroeectng for the necessary due to the tight time frame of this project and the possibility of not being able to negotiate a successful agreement with the property owners. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: During construction of I-81 an 8 inch diameter carrier pipe 1,100 fe tuacrosssthe interstate. It is planned to use this i e as a Paid to install being extended to the APCO serf ce centeortion of the sewer line The staff has negotiated with Mr. acquisition of this pipe and an easement through the remaindert of his property. Mr. Huffman has agreed to accept $30,000 as payment for the pipe and damages to his corn field. County bore across the interstate instead of utilizind the existing pipe, the cost is estimated to be in g the $200,000.00, excess of ALTERNATIVES AND IMPACTS: (1) Authorize payment requested in the amount of $30,000.00 (2) Choose not to utilize the existing pipe. ITEM NUMBER OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER pipeline crossing I-81 through Huffman Estate Funds are available for this project from the recent sale of Utility Bonds. w ~-~"- .3 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The staff recommends Alternative No. 1. SUBMITTED BY: ( ~~ Clifford Craig, Utility Director APPROVED /X~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ----------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved (x) Motion by: Bob L. Johnson/Richard No Yes Abs ent Denied ( ) W. Robers Garrett x Received ( ) Johnson x Ref erred McGraw _~ to Nickens x Robers x cc: File Cliff Craig John Hubbard Don Myers Reta Busher Diane Hyatt . .~ ~- ACTION # A-8988-5.d ITEM NUMBER /^~'- L,/ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: August 9, 198$ AGENDA ITEM: Acquisition of sewer easement through Harris Estate Property COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND- The Board of Supervisors has previousl a participation in the construction of a sewer line f pomvMontclair Estates to the new APCO Service Center. At the July 26, 1988, meeting, the County staff requested that the Board of Supervisors schedule a acquisition of the easements required fore hiss project ng This was necessary due to the tight time frame of this project and the possibility of not being able to negotiate a successful agreement with the property owners. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The County staff has been negotiating with the executors of the Harris Estate and have reached agreement on the location of the line. The purchase price must still be agreed on and approved by the Board of Supervisors. The total land area involved in the easement is 0.86 acres. The property is presently assessed at a acre resulting in a value of pproximately $3,500.00 per requested payment in the amount of $4,300.000($5000e00 wners have and are not willing to negotiate further. per acre), .ALTERNATIVES AND IMPACTS: p~J (1) Authorize payment requested in the amount of $4,300.00 (2) Proceed with public hearing and acquisition of the property through eminent domain. Funds are available for this project from the recent sale of Utility Bonds. ~_ ~ R STAFF RECOMMENDATION: ~~ The staff feels that while the requested payment is somewhat higher than the assessed value, it is not overl is recommended that payment be made as requestedeandsthe Countt Administrator be authorized to execute the appropriate documents.y SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED: n n Cliffor raig, Utility Director E1 er C, ge County Administrator Approved (x) ACTION -_-__-____--'VOTE--_____--- ( ) WotRobers~ Bob L. Johnson/Richard Denied No Yes Abs ent Received ( ) Garrett x Referred Johnson x to McGraw x Nickens x Robers x cc: File Cliff Craig John Hubbard Don Myers Reta Busher Diane Hyatt AT THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 9, 1988 RESOLUTION 8988-5.e REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF WHITE EAGLE LANE, BUFFALO CIRCLE, BLACKHAWK CIRCLE, TEE PEE LANE, WARRIOR DRIVE, BUCKSKIN LANE, CANOE CIRCLE, WARBONNET ROAD, TOMAHAWK CIRCLE, AND SCOUT CIRCLE INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That this matter came this day to be heard upon the proceedings therein and upon the application for: a. White Eagle Lane, a section of road extending from Cherokee Hills Drive (Route 1161) in a northeasterly direction to Buffalo Circle for a distance of 0.06 miles . b. Buffalo Circle extending in a northwest - southeast direction from a T-turn around to a cul-de-sac and intersecting with White Eagle Lane for a distance of 0.15 miles. c. Blackhawk Circle extending from Buffalo Circle in a southwest direction to a cul-de-sac for a distance of 0.04 miles. d. Tee-Pee Lane extending from Cherokee Hills Drive (Route 1161) in a southerly direction to Warrior Drive for a distance of 0.07 miles. e. Warrior Drive extending in a northwest - southeast direction from a T-turn around to a cul-de-sac and intersecting with Tee-Pee Lane for a distance of 0.20 miles. f. Buckskin Lane extending from Cherokee Hills Drive (Route 1161) in a northerly direction to a cul-de-sac for a distance of 0.08 miles. g. Canoe Circle extending from Cherokee Hills Drive (Route 1161) in a northerly direction to a cul-de-sac for a distance of 0.07 miles. h. Warbonnet Road extending from Cherokee Hills Drive (Route 1161) in a northerly direction to a cul-de-sac for a distance of 0.10 miles. i. Tomahawk Circle extending from Warbonnet Road in a westerly direction to a cul-de-sac for a distance of 0.09 miles. ~. Scout Circle extending from Cherokee Hills Drive (Route 1161) in a southwesterly direction to a cul-de-sac for a distance of 0.09 miles. Pursuant to Section 33.1-72.1, Paragraph C-1 and funded pursuant to Section 33.1-75.1, Paragraph A of the Code of Virginia, of 1950 as amended. 2. That this Board does guarantee the Commonwealth of Virginia an unrestricted right-of-way of 50 feet with necessary easements for drainage as recorded in Plat Book 9, Page 59, dated February 13, 1976, and deeds of later dates, of record in the Roanoke County Circuit Court Clerk's Office. 2 3, That this Board does certify that this road was open to public use prior to July 1, 1978, at which time it was open to and used by motor vehicles. 4. That this Board does certify that speculative interests are not involved. 5, That said roads known as White Eagle Lane, Buffalo Circle, Blackhawk Circle, Tee-Pee Lane, Warrior Drive, Buckskin Lane, Canoe Circle, Warbonnet Road, Tomahawk Circle and Scout Circle and which are shown on a certain sketch accompanying this resolution be, and the same is hereby established as public roads to become a part of the state secondary system of highways in Roanoke County, only from and after notification of official acceptance of said street or highway by the Virginia Department of Transportation. On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor Robers, and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Nickens, Robers, Garrett NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor McGraw A COPY - TESTE: ~- Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Phillip T. Henry, Director, Engineering Arnold Covey, Director, Development & Inspections, and Copy for Virginia Department of Transportation 3 i i ITEM NUMBER ~ °" AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: August 9, 1988 SUBJECT: Acceptance of White Eagle Lane, Buffalo Circle, Black- hawk Circle, Tee-Pee Lane, Warrior Drive, Buckskin Lane, Canoe Circle, Warbonnet Road, Tomahawk Circle, and Scout Circle of the Cherokee Hills Subdivision into the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary Road System. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The residents of Section 1, Cherokee Hills Subdivision request that the Board of Supervisors approve a resolution to the Virginia Department of Transportation requesting that they accept the above noted roads into the State Secondary System. The roads have been inspected by County and VDOT personnel and necessary right of way and easements have been acquired. FISCAL IMPACT: The cost for these road improvements were included in the Roanoke County 1985 Road Bond. The preliminary estimated cost for these improvements is $185,000 dollars. RECOMMENDATIONS: The staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors approve a resolution to the Virginia Department of Transportation requesting that they accept White Eagle Lane, Buffalo Circle, Blackhawk Circle, Tee-Pee Lane, Warrior Drive, Buckskin Lane, Canoe Circle, Warbonnet Road, Tomahawk Circle, and Scout Circle into the Secondary Road System. SUBMITTED BY: Phil i ~~ p T. enrY, P.E. Director of Engineering APPROVED; E1 C. H e County Administrator Approved ( ~ ACTION ------------------ ---------- Motion by; VOTE Denied ( ~ No Yes Abs Received ( ~ Garrett Referred Johnson to McGraw Nickens Robers 2 ~_ , NORTH ACCEPTANCE OF BUCKSKIN LANE, BUFFALO CIRCLE, COMMUNITY SERVICES gLACKHAWK CIRCLE, WHITE EAGLE LANE, TEE-PEE & DEVELOPMENT LANE AND WARRIOR DRIVE 3 NfXl, NX/F o . ~~(, `< e f \ cLENV4ay,1 ~~ ? ~ .c` ' _..` µ aEw, ;~ ~`;, N,~MS~~ b~'~ ~~~ ELEM SOL./~ ~ ~ ~ ~~, ~n3 ao, .n/ ..:\1~~ ~ ,919 ~ ~~-, ~ / -'-~ yR •~~}a,,~~.~•~_~~ _~ 645 85B s..'.~` ° ~~ .- i, ~ wovs . n.a~ / ~ ' ~~~. 811 ~ ND ~„F l ~.`po /iM µyµ l~~ \\ aN5 ~~ J ~ ~ L\C ~\ /AR 46 j ~ 646 .VICINITY MAP ~~~ •,~~ ~~ ""PC c ~ r. .... NORTH 4 I~~~~~~ COMMUNITY SERVICES OMAHAWKCCIRCLEC ANDCCANOE'CIRCBONNET ROAD, ~ DEVELOPMENT AT THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 9, 1988 RESOLUTION REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF WHITE EAGLE LANE, BUFFALO CIRCLE, BLACKHAWK CIRCLE, TEE PEE LANE, WARRIOR DRIVE, BUCKSKIN LANE, CANOE CIRCLE, WARBONNET ROAD, TOMAHAWK CIRCLE, AND SCOUT CIRCLE INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That this matter came this day to be heard upon the proceedings therein and upon the application for: a. White Eagle Lane, a section of road extending from Cherokee Hills Drive (Route 1161) in a northeasterly direction to Buffalo Circle for a distance of 0.06 miles . b. Buffalo Circle extending in a northwest - southeast direction from a T-turn around to a cul-de-sac and intersecting with White Eagle Lane for a distance of 0.15 miles. c. Blackhawk Circle extending from Buffalo Circle in a southwest direction to a cul-de-sac for a distance of 0.04 miles. d. Tee-Pee Lane extending from Cherokee Hills Drive (Route 1161) in a southerly direction to Warrior Drive for a distance of 0.07 miles. e. Warrior Drive extending in a northwest - southeast direction from a T-turn around to a cul-de-sac and intersecting with Tee-Pee Lane for a distance of 0.20 miles. 5 ' 1 °" f. Buckskin Lane extending from Cherokee Hills Drive (Route 1161) in a northerly direction to a cul-de-sac for a distance of 0.08 miles. g. Canoe Circle extending from Cherokee Hills Drive (Route 1161) in a northerly direction to a cul-de-sac for a distance of 0.07 miles. h. Warbonnet Road extending from Cherokee Hills Drive (Route 1161) in a northerly direction to a cul-de-sac for a distance of 0.10 miles. i. Tomahawk Circle extending from Warbonnet Road in a westerly direction to a cul-de-sac for a distance of 0.09 miles. ]• Scout Circle extending from Cherokee Hills Drive (Route 1161) in a southwesterly direction to a cul-de-sac for a distance of 0.09 miles. Pursuant to Section 33.1-72.1, Paragraph C-1 and funded pursuant to Section 33.1-75.1, Paragraph A of the Code of Virginia, of 1950 as amended. 2. That this Board does guarantee the Commonwealth of Virginia an unrestricted right-of-way of 50 feet with necessary easements for drainage as recorded in Plat Book 9, page 59, dated February 13, 1976, and deeds of later dates, of record in the Roanoke County Circuit Court Clerk's Office. 3. That this Board does certify that this road was open to public use prior to July 1, 1978, at which time it was open to and used by motor vehicles. 4. That this Board does certify that speculative interests are not involved. 6 ~,~-~'-j ~.. 5. That said roads known as White Eagle Lane, Buffalo Circle, Blackhawk Circle, Tee-Pee Lane, Warrior Drive, Buckskin Lane, Canoe Circle, Warbonnet Road, Tomahawk Circle and Scout Circle and which are shown on a certain sketch accompanying this resolution be, and the same is hereby established as public roads to become a part of the state secondary system of highways in Roanoke County, only from and after notification of official acceptance of said street or highway by the Virginia Department of Transportation. 7 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THTHEOROANOKESCOUNTYSADI`'IINISTRATOION COUNTY , VIRGINIA, HELD A 1988 CENTER ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 9, RESOLUTION 898 f SUPPORTING REQUEST FROM GREATER ROANGEE~T~DIFOROTHENRADAR/CORTORANTHE OIL OVERCHAR PROGRAM WHEREAS, The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors was responsible for implementation of the CORTRAN Program and supports its continuation under the RADAR/CORTRAN Program, and WHEREAS, from 1973 to 1980, certain oil companies overcharged for their products and a fund was established allowing these companies to refund these monies, and WHEREAS, The Greater Roanoke Transit Company has applied for these funds from the Virginia Department of Transportation, to allocate them to the RADAR/CORTRAN, and WHEREAS, RADAR/CORTRAN will use these funds for a $56,310 project which involves the computerization of vehicle data collection devices. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia as follows: 1. That the Board of Supervisors supports the request of the Greater Roanoke Transit Company to receive Oil Overcharge Refund money to be allocated to the RADAR/CORTRAN protect, and 2. That a certified copy of this resolution be sent to and that Virginia Department of Transportation, 3 That certified copies of this resolution be sent to other Roanoke Vall~_1 localities urging them to support this request. On motion of Su pervisor Johnson, seconded b Nickens, and u Y Supervisor pon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, Nic NAYS: kens, Garrett None ABSENT: Supervisor McGraw A COPY - TESTE: ~~, `~/ , 8/10/88 cc: Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors File Greater Roanoke Transit Virginia De Company Clerk partment of Transportation Roanoke City Clerk, City of Salem Clerk, Town of Vinton L.. -1 COUI1j"~ OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA CAPITAL FUND - UNAPPROPRIATED BALANCE Beginning Balance at July 1, 1988 $ 1,637 Additional Amount from 1988- 89 Budget 50,000 Balance as of August 9, 1988 Submitted by Diane D. Hyatt /IJ Director of Finance 51 637 ~- COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA UNAPPROPRIATED BALANCE - GOAL FUND Unaudited Amount at July 1, 1988 $1,380,346 Balance as of August 9, 1988 1.380.346 The recommended level for fund balance for 1988-89 is $1,748,124, which is 3 percent of the total General Fund budget. Submitted by ~\ ~ f Diane D. Hyatt ` Director of Finance ~~~ COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA RESERVE FOR BOARD CONPINGF~ICy Original Budget at July 1, 1988 $50,000 June 28, 1988 Funding of Length of Service Benefit for Volunteer Fire, Rescue, and Auxiliary Sheriff's Deputies (9,000) July 26, 1988 'Itaeed's Access Road (39,405) Balance as of August 9, 1988 1 595 Submitted by .~ Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY , VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 9, 1988 RESOLUTION SUPPORTING REQUEST FROM GREATER ROANOKE TRANSIT COMPANY FOR USE OF THE OIL OVERCHARGE REFUND FOR THE RADAR/CORTRAN PROGRAM WHEREAS, The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors was responsible for implementation of the CORTRAN Program and supports its continuation under the RADAR/CORTRAN Program, and WHEREAS, from 1973 to 1980, certain oil companies overcharged for their products and a fund was established allowing these companies to refund these monies, and WHEREAS, The Greater Roanoke Transit Company has applied for these funds from the Virginia Department of Transportation, to allocate them to the RADAR/CORTRAN, and WHEREAS, RADAR/CORTRAN will use these funds for a $56,310 project which involves the computerization of vehicle data collection devices. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia as follows: 1. That the Board of Supervisors supports the request of the Greater Roanoke Transit Company to receive Oil Overcharge Refund money to be allocated to the RADAR/CORTRAN project, and 2. That a certified copy of this resolution be sent to Virginia Department of Transportation, and that 3 That certified copies of this resolution be sent to other Roanoke Valley localities urging them to support this request. OF ~CANU~F ~ ~~ % Z A J 2 '`a 18 Aso 88 YE4N5 SFSQUICENTENN\P\' A BeautifulBe~iuninp COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE Rev. Steve Harris Baptist Childrens' Home Salem, Virginia 24153 Dear Reverend Harris: August 19, 1988 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS LEE GARRETT, CHAIRMAN WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT RICHARD W. ROBERS. VICE-CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT STEVEN A. MCGRAW CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT On behalf of the Board of Supervisors, I would like to take this opportunity to let you know of our appreciation for your attending the meeting on August 9, 1988 to offer the invocation. We feel it is most important to ask God's blessing on these meetings so that all is done according to His will and for the good of all citizens. Thank you again for sharing your time with us. Very truly yours, ~~~ - Le Garrett, Chairman Ro noke County Board of Supervisors bjh (~uixnt~ of ~attnakr P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 2 4018-07 9 8 (703) 772.2004 POANOri' z°~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~~t~~~e ~ ~~ v ,,: 'a 18 Eso~ 88 DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES , SFSQUICENTENN~P~ ° MEMORANDUM ,~j~ A Bcnuli~ul8c~innin~ ~ .. ' ~, T0: Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator FROM: D. K. Cook Director of Human Resources DATE: July 7, 1988 SUBJECT: Roanoke County Smoking Policy As you are aware, the Board of Supervisors requested the DepuTtpSetoff Human Resources to work with aformpounty buildings and facilities. establishing a smoking policy The Smoking Policy Committee held several mAliveg& We1lwCoalitoonSStheed by representatives from the Roanoke Valley American Lung Association and the Roanoke County Health Department. The committee was composed of smokers and nonb mldinss and facil~tmestee did not recommend a ban on smoking in county g The committee recommends that smoking and no smokinghercommittee was established. In the designation of smoking areas, also concerned with inidualaworkeareastdesignatedeasaCSmoking areas", be recommended that indiv provided air filtering devices by the employee. The committee also fe t that smoking areas in lounges, lunch rooms, or break rooms designated as "smoking areas" be provided with air filtering devices by the county. Accordingly there is a cost impact in the purchase of air filtering devices in thoaercfilteringadevices inpthesescommonfareaseass. The cost for installing approximately $9,000 as estimated by the Director of General Services. In addition to the cost of air filtering devices provided by the county, the Director of General Services also estimates that approximately $1,000 will be required for necessary signs in implementing and informing employees and the public on this policy. -z- The total estimated cost for the air filtering devices and signal will be approximately $10,000. Enclosed is the Roanoke County smoking policy recommended by the Smoking Policy Committee. We would like to present this policy to the Board of Supervisors for its consideration and recommend the appropriation of funds required to place this policy into effect. In the event you have any questions please let me know. bbd Enclosure ~c" ~ i ~~'. ~, M E M O R A N D U M 'a~"~ ~, ~`~"~~~ /~~ ~. ~. U \,.. v W u~ ~,. 7 U N ( . c~~ .~y ~ o G C ,, TO: Keith Cook, Director ~ ~' Department of Human Resources ~~ "~ ~ ~ a, c`, ~ ~ ~i ~ a C F ROM: Joyce Mi 11s, Secretary ~ ~'` ~ ~~ ~~j ~~Z``~ Department of General Se ides DATE: June 16, 1988 RE: Estimated Cost for Signage and Air Filtering Devices For County Buildings and Leased Space I have compiled an estimated cost from the information furnished by members of the Smoking Policy Committee for signs and air filtering devices for County owned buildings and leased space. There will be approximately 275 signs needed to indicate "Smoking" or "No Smoking" if these signs are placed throughout offices, breakrooms, lunchrooms, hallways, etc., and entrances to each County-owned building and leased space, except the Roanoke County Courthouse. r 275 signs 2" x 8" @ $3.00 each = $ 825.00 275 signs 2" x 10" @ $3.75 each = $1,031.25 These prices were quoted to me from Roanoke Stamp and Seal. The Smokeeter air filtering devices needed in Roanoke County- owned and leased buildings would be used in common areas only. These units vary in price from $445 to $1,295 + delivery and installation and maintenance fees. Based on the information received from committee members, there will be a need for 8 units a t an approximate cost of $ 8,860. This amount includes delivery and installation. Service c ontracts are available for these units at an annual rate or units can be serviced and charged per visit. The above Smokeeter prices are subject to negotiation depending on the number of units purchased. An estimated cost for 275 - 2"x8" signs and 8 air filtering devices is $ 9,685. Estimated cost for 275 - 2"x10" signs and 8 air filtering devices is $9,891. I have enclosed a copy of the revised Smoking Policy to be sub- mitted with the Board report for the June 28th Board meeting. If I can be of further assistance, please let me know. ]sm ~/ ( / /~ d /~- ! Jd~l / ~~ ROANOKE COUNTY SMOKING POLICY ~ ~- -+~'"" 1. 0 PURPOSE: ~~''= The purpose of this Roanoke County Smoking Policy is to establish a policy for County owned buildings and facilities, including leased space, that will protect the rights of the nonsmokers for for an environ ment as free from secondhand and sidestream smoke as possible, and to provide those who choose to smoke, the opportunity to do so. The County plans to provide employees and the public with an example of health promoting behavior, by maintaining an environment as clean and healthful as possible and to reduce the discomfort of employees and the public whose tolerance for tobacco smoke is limited. Furt}zer, sidestream smoke contains higher concentrations of carcinogenic and toxic gases and c}zemicals shown to affect the healt}z and comfort of nonsmokers ,oho come in contact with the smoke. It is believed that a spirit of thoughtfulness and cooperation among employees and the public in County buildings and facilities is normally adequate to resolve any disputes which might arise under the policy. It is part of tlz.is policy that where disputes cannot be resolved, the rights of the nonsmoker for clean air s}Zell be giveci precedence. 2.0 DEFINITIONS: 2.1 Smoking...Carrying or possessing any lighted tobacco products, to include: cigars, pipes, and cigarettes. 2.2 Designated Smoking Area...Any area within a County facility w}iere smoking is specifically permitted and shall be so situated as to allow nonsmoking individuals reasonable opportunity to conduct normal activity in an area as smoke free as possible. 3.0 POLICY: 3.1 Smoking is prohibited in the following areas: 3.1.1 Conference and meeting rooms; reception, waiting, and counter areas; individual work areas, except as indicated in 3.2.1. 3.1.2 Medical facilities or areas ;~rhere cots may be set up ?.rr~+*r' for i11 employees. ~- „ ,,.. -- 3.1.3 Classrooms and auditoriums. -- "~ ~ "`~ '`"` 3.1.4 Lobbies, hallurays, elevators, and restrooms. 3.2 Designated Smoking I~re~-is: 3. 2. 1 Individual work areas mill. be destgnatc~d as "smoking areas" if conditions of tyre definition "designated smoking area" are met: by ventilation, barriers, distance between work areas, --~?r f~ ~+-~r-~-~a ~-- t 7 r lyrl -~ ~~ ]ss r -3- 1, .~, - - - -- - - - ~ J ~ j ., to i 1 ~~ • Z l l I l l~ (7 iJ ~ l L V ~ ~ ~ i+w,~r''""j~- ~-rs~r-) , or other methods, to minimize environmental tobacco smoke . -- ,~;< ~ v f'i/~z 3.2.2 Areas in lounges, lunchrooms, or brew};rooms earl be designated "smokiing areas" as tong as criteria in the definition and in paragraph 3.2.1 are met. •~e .tee-t~-n-~~-~ r ~ ~ ~~~Ja i-rl«-~i.x ~ ~ ~ _~ ~ - - - - - - ~ ~ - r -n--t-n-Q-~ ~ :~ ._~-~.e.t.~~.. -.,~,~~„a ~ _ _ „L~:..~ _.enip..l-ca~r,e.c~. fr~-r~° =br-ea-}~s.... 3.3 Based on unique characteristics in structure and authority of_ the Courthouse and County Jail, those buildings are specifically excluded from this policy. It is expected that a clean air policy will be developed in order to provide rzonsrnoking employees, guests, inmates, and visitors with an environment as free from environmental tobacco smoke as possible. 4.0 RESOLUTION OF DISPUTES AND ENFORCEMENT: 4.1 Smoking will be prohibited in any work area if one employee who is assigned to that area, or who is a victim of environ- mental tobacco smoke emanating from that work area, registers a confidential complaint to his/her super- visor about smoking, asks that smoking be prohibited, and ~ th e va lidity of the complaint is confirmed by the supervisor or department head. _ ,--~~-. 4.2 The supervisor, may attempt"rto resolve t•~~zv Pict by the methods reviewed in paragraph 3.2.1. 4.3" If the supervisor and employee are unable to come to an acceptable solution, the Smoking Policy Committee will be involved as arbitrator. If those methods are not sufficient to minimize environmental tobacco smoke, tine preferences of ~-`~~ ~ the nonsmoker will prevail. ~~ ~' 4.~ The Smoking Policy Committee will be composed of t'rre committee for the development of a smoking policy. 4.~ Department heads and supervisors are responsible for imple- menting and enforcing this policy and decisions of the Smoking Policy Committee. 4.~! Suitable signs furnished and installed by the County, will clearly identify designated "Smoking" and "Nonsmoking" areas. ~~... 4.~ This policy will qo into effF~ct upon adoption by the Board of Supervisors a; County Policy. There will be a six (6) month transition period during which the following activ- i-ties will occur: 9.~.1 Supe.rvisors and department heads will educate their empl.oy~~es on environmental tobacco smoke and the smoking policy through staff meetings, speakers, and other means. 4.~. 2 Designated smokinq areas wi 11 be determined by per- sonnel working ir1 a facility or by a committee selected from the smokers and nonsmokers of the facility. Appropriate signs ,~nd_ a;r fL],f~r,; ~~,.~_ ~~~ will be installed. 4.x.3 Signs prohibiting smoking in areas specified in paragrapiz 3.1 will be installed. 4.~.4 Employees who desire assistance with smoking cessa- tion or reduction will be provided information about available methods and programs. The specifics of the employee incentives will be addressed and developed through the employee health program - "Heart at Work" which will include smoking cessation classes provided by tl-re County. ~-Z7-~8 ROANOKE COUNTY SMOKING POLICY 1 . 0 PURPOSE: ~ ~u,Ges The purp e of this Roanoke County Smoking Policy is to establish for County owned buildings. and facilities, including leased space, that will protect the rights of the nonsmokers for for an environment as free from secondhand and sidestream smoke as possible, and to provide those, who choose to smoke, the opportunity to .do so. The County plans to provide employees and the public with an example of health-promoting behavior, by maintaining an environment as clean and healthful as possible and to reduce the discomfort of employees and ubl i__c whose t ~ x.a-r~~-~--f tobacco smoke is limited. Further`, ~,idest_rea;m/ oke~~on i "s higher concen_ ra ions .of car.~cirr'ogenic,-2~nd~~ '~c~ ~a ~ the c ls, shown,,t'~,:a~fect ~hei`h~a,lth andj cb~t-f r weo e~'n o to itl the` smoke-: ~~ ~' p,v- ~~- , ~-"'-- - ~ ----- It is believed that a spirit of thoughtfulness a-nd cooperation among employees and the public in County buildings and facilities is normally adequate to resolve any disputes which might arise under the policy. `1~here disputes cannot be resolved, the rights of the nonsmoker for clean air shall be given precedence. 2.0 DEFINITIONS: 2.1 Smoking...Carrying or possessing any lighted tobacc products, to include: cigars, pipes, and cigarettes. 2.2 Designated Smoking Area...Any area within a County fa lity where smoking is specifically permitt"ed and_ !s situated Ito allow nonsmoking individuals reasonable opportunity to conduct normal activity in an area as smoke free:as possible._ ~ -- ' 3.0 POLICY: 3.1 Smoking is prohibited in the following areas: 3.1.1 Conference and meeting rooms; reception, waiting, and counter areas; individual work areas, except as indicated in 3.2.1. 3.1.2 Medical facilities or areas where cots may be set up for ill employees. 3.1.3 Classrooms and auditoriums. 3.1.4 Lobbies, hallways, elevators, and restrooms. 3.2 Designated Smoking Areas: 3.2.1 Individual work areas will be designated as "smoking areas" if conditions of the definition "designated smoking area" are met by ventilation, barriers, distance between work areas, or other methods to minimize environmental tobacco smoke. 3.2.2 Areas in lounges, lunchrooms, or breakrooms can be designated "smoking areas" as long as criteria in the definition and in paragraph 3.2.1 are met. 3.3 Based on unique characteristics in structure and authority of the Courthouse and County Jail, those buildings are specifically excluded from this policy. It is expected that a clean air policy will be developed in order to provide nonsmoking employees, guests, inmates, and visitors with an environment as free from tobacco smoke as possible. 4.0 RESOLUTION OF DISPUTES AND ENFORCEMENT: 4.1 Smoking will be prohibited in any work area ifs employee who is assigned to that area, or who is a victim of environ- mental tobacco smoke emanating from that work area, registers a confidential complaint to his/her super- visor about smoking, asks that smoking be prohibited, and the validity of the complaint is confirmed by the supervisor or department head. 4.2 The supervisor may attempt to resolve the conflict by the methods reviewed in paragraph 3.2.1. 4.3 If the supervisor and employee are unable to come to an acceptable solution, the Smoking Policy Committee will be' involved as arbitrator. If those methods are not sufficient to minimize environmental tobacco smoke, the preference's of the nonsmoker will prevail. _ _- 4.4 Smokin will be _ - -- --- -__ g prohibited iri previously designated smoking areas in lounges, lunchrooms, or breakrooms if ~~-employee who is a victim of environmental tobacco smoke emanating from that area registers a confidential complaint to the smoking committee about smoking, asks that smoking be pro- hibited, and the validity of the complaint is confirmed by the smoking committee. 4.5 The Smoking Policy Committee will be composed of the committee for the development of a smoking policy. 4.6 Department heads and supervisors are responsible for imple- menting and enforcing this policy and decisions of the Smoking Policy Committee. -2- 4.7 Suitable signs furnished and installed by the County, will clearly identify designated "Smoking" and "Nonsmoking" areas. 4.8 This policy will go into effect upon adoption by the Board of Supervisors as County Policy. There will be a six (6) month transition period during which the following activ- ities will occur: 4.8.1 Supervisors and department heads will educate their employees on environmental tobacco smoke and the smoking policy through staff meetings, speakers, and other means. 4.8.2 Designated smoking areas will .be determined by per- sonnel working in a facility or by a committee selected from the smokers and nonsmokers of the facility. Appropriate signs will be installed. 4.8.3 Signs prohibiting smoking in areas specified in paragraph 3.1 will be installed. 4.8.4 Employees who desire assistance with smoking cessa- tion or reduction will be provided information about available methods and programs. The specifics of the employee incentives will be addressed and developed through the employee health program - "Heart at Work" which will include smoking cessation classes provided by the County. 7/7.7/88 -3- S ttl P"~•Cy 7~' f~c' r,n,'.,,c. /, ifs/ ~/ ~' ~~~ 42 ,J L ,~~ d ,., ~ "~ ~`:; / . G ~ , °~ ~-<~ L' ° f ~; fo ,sue f'. ,,o.F- v - /, . ~. ~PJ ~`~ Z. f/~ ~ 788-10 Public Hearing on the adoption of a resolution requesting the Circuit Court of Roanoke County to enter an order to hold a referendum on the question of changing the method of selection of members of the County School Board, as provided in Section 22.1-42 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended. 5 CITIZENS SPOKE SAM/RR TO VOTE ON ISSUE ON 8/9/88 URC N. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance accepting an offer :and authorizing conveyance of a right-of-way and easement to Appalachian Power Company for Green Hill Park. -_ -_ --~ HCN/SAM TO~=APPRaVE 1ST READING 2ND READING.- 8./9/88 - URC 2. Ordinance accepting an offer and authorizing conveyane~ __ --of an easement to Appalachian Power Company at the _ _-_ ___ _ - Fire and Rescue Training Center. HCN/SAM TO-.APPROVE 1ST READING 2ND READ ING-----$ / 9 / 8 8 - URC _ 0. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance amending and reenacting Chapter 5, Animals and Fowl, of the Roanoke County Code concerning the licensing of dogs and rabies control. 7 of a~ANO'~F ~ ,A Z A J ? 0 0 QaQ 18 $ ri50 88 S~SQU~CENTENN~P~ A Beauti~ul/3e~inninA COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE C~nun~,~ of ~n~tnnhe Rev. Steve Harris Baptist Children's Home Salem, Virginia 24153 Dear Reverend Harris: June 2, 1988 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS LEE GARRETT, CHAIRMAN WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT RICHARD W. ROBERS. VICE-CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT STEVEN A. MCGRAW CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VIN TON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT On behalf of the Board of Supervisors, I would like to thank you for giving the invocation at the Board of Supervisors' meeting in the past. We would again like to call on on Tuesday, August 9, 1988, at 3:00 you to present the invocation this, please call me at 772-2005. pSomeone f~omathis officetwill be calling you soon to see if this time is acceptable to you, or if you would prefer another date. The Board members are aware of how bus and they appreciate your volunteering the timeoto offeru Godss blessing at their meetings. Sincerely, bjh ~'7GLL-c-~-~ ,~ Mary H. Allen Deputy Clerk ~'` ..c/ P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24018-0798 (703> 772-2004