Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
9/27/1988 - Regular
r<~.µ,~;~~ T Na/ Vii"'`Ct,h - '~l~u7vyl t!~l.oU Kun~'vurti_ i:~~;v T Y ~ rt~ha~~E.TL~~ 5.~ ftUhiVlRj_ V h L~UIv ~TKTc C'F `vir~, ~.,lTY l~rtr~ ~.t- Y~l:i~ivC,~ r+~rl~,'~ylT Lf N,~LI1,NT1l~i ~ + (Thz_ T it~~ J_n~ v;u~tl.rcrTll, ~, jL,LK lir- ~~"ATli. v !5 F•~~=i.I~h _ . ~ wri!(.h L nl.K ~'~ Thy +tlV, r'JL`L 1 LJ_'~VCriJ f !y Yl.if~` Jhl~ ll, uh iL Y (YtwSNhNEk "" i~~TlrY JT~Tt uf- j'~i i Iii ~H~ r Tr.H i 7rrrr ~;.l,.Y uGLl:)r'~u M,Vrvt.~~li r~I~r~ „tCr~,ir/,~NtK~ L.„r~~ i LEGAL NOTICE Notice is hereby Dlven to all In- ~ y / I ~ ~ ~ u ~ ~ c !`, ! ~ ~ terested persons that the V '> f L V / C% ~ ~ Roanoke Coun}y Board of Su- V 1= j1 ! i°Y u i Dervlsors will holtl a public hearinD at their eveninD ses- .Y I l ~~; ~ J J ~ slon beDinnlnD at 7:00 P. m. on f ~ h ! ,> Tuesday, SEPTEMBER. 27, - _~ i ~ T u f{ Y L ~ 1988 In the Communit of the Roanoke Y ROOm J C r' ~~ t i i) C tt ! y C ij m(nls}ration County Ad- Brambleton Centel' 3738 _ _ ~ - Roanoke, VIrD nla~on fhe p _ `' titlon of ROgNOKE COUNTY ' '•-- _ _ BOARD OF SUPERVISORS J JIJI~~'iTIJ C ~ 1, ~ 1 L ~ r< + RE-RESIDENTIAL IESTgTES ~ to M-1 LIGHT INDUSTRIAL of ' a tract containinD gppROXI- MAYFLY 3.2 ACRES. and lo- cated IMMEDIATELY EAST OF CLOVERDALE ROAD (ROUTE 604) AND KINGS- MEN ROAD (ROUTE 608) to the HOLLINS Mapisterlal Dis- trict, RezoninD has been requested ~ for q BUFFER YARD INCON- ' JUNCTION WITH A CATA LOG FULFILLMENT CEN- TER. The County PlanninD Commission recommends AP- PROVAL WITH PROFFERED CONDITIONS. /~ copy of the ZoninD Ordinance of Roanoke County and amendments thereto as well as a copy of the Petition, site Plan, and other documents re• laced to this request may be examined In the office of the DeYartment of Plennln0 and Zoning, lotted in Room 600 pf the Roanoke County Adminls- tratlon Centsr. Roanoke County wijl Provide as- sistance to handicapped per- sons desirinD to attentl Public hearinOS, Such indlvidualsare requested to contact the Coun- tY office of personnel Services ((703) 772.2018) if special pro- visions are necessary for at_ tendance. Given under my hand this SEV- ENTH day of SEPTEMBER, 1988, Mary H. Allen, DePUtY Clerk Roanoke Coun}y Board of Supervisors (7091) v;r/riI\attc ) Irvc;; t, t'i :J 1 ~ V 1~ i`: C 91~u~5~}y F~U~:L 1JhCti ~ J t't_~ - iI15.>t rsl;tiiYU1~C LuI:IVTY trl.:r+r~r~ lF ~i,r'tl~Vi~uK . Teo uK.~t'~sbLt7iil :ir, t' ~' ;r i.1~ C'iviv KL:vitt va L~tJlu JINiL 1.i 1` V1rtv1IVLH nr+`iu.~vl i i. t= Nut;Lil;.;I iul'v i, (tr,~ jIP`!ta-hl,r;iU u~~~n~~ir~ui 1, 1. ,tNdJKryTluiv >tii1 urrii,cn ur- t'L~~:Tll,t'v I~ ) rucLl;,ntn i/r v.tliirfi l.Uk- 7nE n TII'^t5 L nL~t_ r'UZ;! 1Jt i.-f~Ev,JT H ~:•I u~tiur ~Y ivt'r~J~'r+F'tti _ 7iu I^y ~1Ku1,~jNT ,ju hiUFiIVUhCy I,ti + LKf1t=Y TriHT TrC JTr~jt OF ~V IiTILi vti l~J N LtJ L.1Jf'.~I V 1i~ Tt-i~ ,4ivi~ItXe_ls ~` v'1~ TrIL r`UL~.U . J Irli`rl~ l:v-~~tJ ri1LV ~ ~)j_WJ~Fi~it(,j v`y~ij/~~s L 1/~irli~~ L5/r~/u~ tYtrvl,~u wiT`rL;i:iT Tr,1J L;il urY ut- JcF~Ttf~;nttIy;s LEGAL NOTICE NoTice (s hereby given to all tn- teresTed .persons that the Roanoke CounTy Board of Su- pervisors will hold a public hearing at their evening as. lion be0inninp at 7:00 p,m, on Tuesday, SEPTEMBER 27, j 1981, in the Community Room I of Me Rwnoke CounTy Ad- I ministration Center, 3738 Brembleton Avfnw, S.W , ~ Roanoke, Virginia, on the Pe_' tition of CBL MANAGE- MENT, INC. requesting rezon-! ing from M-1 INDUSTRIAL to B-2 BUSINESS of a tract con- taining 4,13 ACRES and locat- ed ON THE WEST SIDE OF MERRIMAN ROAD (ROUTE 613) gppROXIMATELY 100 FEET SOUTH OF STARKEY ROAD (ROUTE 904) in the CAVE SPRING Magisterial DlstrtcT. Rezoning has been requested To CONSTRUCT A SHOPPING CENTER. The County Plen- ning Commission recom- mends APPROVAL WITH PROFFERED CONDITIONS. A copy of the Zoning Ordinance of Roanoke County and amendments thereto as well as a copy of the petition, site plan, and other documents re- lated to this request may be examined In the office of the Department of Planning and Zoning, located In Room 600ot the Roanoke County gdmints- I tration Center. Roanoke County will provide as- sistance to handicapped per- sons desiring }o a}}end public heartngs.SuchindiWdualsare tY offlceeof Personnel ServIces I ((703) 772-2018) (f Special pro- vtstons are necessary for at. tendance. Given under my hand this SEV- ENTH day of SEPTEMBER, ' 1988. Mery H. Allen, Deputy Clerk RoanokeCoun}ygoardof Supervisors - -- I (5544) LAW OFFICES OSTERHOUDT, FERGUSON, NATT, AHERON ~ AGEE A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 1919 ELECTRIC ROAD. S. W. CHARLES H.OSTERHOUDT P.O.BOX ZOO6$ MICHAEL 5. FERGUSON TELEPHONE EDWARD A. NATT ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 703-774-1197 MICHAEL J. AHERON 24018- 1699 FAX NO. G. STEVEN AGEE 703-774-0961 MARK D. KIDD October 4, 1988 Ms. Mary Allen, Clerk Board of Supervisors County of Roanoke P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 Dear Mary: Enclosed please find the certificate of publication for the Chapparral Forest Associates rezoning. Please place this with the Board records. If you have any questions, please give me a call. With best personal regards, I am Very truly yours, OSTERHOUDT, FERGUSON, NATT, AHERON 8 AGEE, P.C. ,,_ Edward A. Natt /bp Encl. t<.Hi\~.,t\L T Ii`?tS u r~.:~Lu-t~~r,S hii ~•vi~"i::tti - y1~luU`o f ~~;LlSrltr<'~ i=~t= - xli7.u~r t V,~ii i~v /-1 i~NT 1 191` L-t_~, i r<I% n Svc KI;Mi~i.;ItC `N M l4U l t; T„Tt ut- vlt~ul:tilu ITY trF nuri~i:lt .+.Friuk'VIT uF i'liuLli,~iuN I r t Trt u~V~~KSIStvi=i/) H+~ ~rFIl,ct~ ur I;tii~J-wLhl_i: ~,uKNUR~1UfVr ~rril(,i~ l,.itZ- u)~AT1U~~ I;i r'Jc~tlSi-itK Lr Tr,t tt.if~ifdl';I~c ICJ L vtiL.t'C~u-rYCY'+Jr N uHI~Y i\LrYJF'Ht~C1'< ~cL1St1rU i;v R~rl~uiLtr lrv Tr;F STr;7t ur= Itcultvt~r U Iri=e<TIrY Tr1rT THc Hiti;Vcxti U~1L,L ihHJ f Vi5L1:)f"C(. li'r JfilU ;tiCNiJ~i~~~i~J 'v Trt FULL~rriiV~ i:~iTCJ Uy/1S/LiU CYt+vliVv uy/LU/<5i~ CVi=~1`Yv ITl~c:i:i~ TH1S_ ' ST vr+Y Lr JtNTc~i~~KlyciL _- LEGAL NOTICE Notice is hereby given to all in- terested persons that the Roanoke County Board of Su- pervisors will hold s public hearing at their evening ses- sion beginning at 7:00 p. m. on Tuesday, SEPTEMBER 27, 1988, in the Community Room of the Roanoke County Ad- ministration Center, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, S.W., Roanoke, Virginia, on the pe- tition of CHAPARRAL FOR- EST ASSOCIATES requesting rezoning from R-1 RESIDEN- TIAL fo R-5 RESIDENTIAL of a tract containing 2.97 ACRES and located ON THE NORTH SIDE OF CHAPARRAL DRIVE (ROUTE 800) AP- PROXIMATELY 300 FEET WEST OF ITS INTERSEC- TION WITH BEACON DRIVE (ROUTE 1940) In the CAVE SPRING Ma0lsterial District. Rezoning has been requested to CONSTRUCT TOWN1iOME5 WITH INDIVIDUAL LOTS FOR SALE. The County Plan- ning Commission recom- mends DENIAL. A coDY of the ZoninO Ordinance of Roanoke County end amendments thereto as well es a copy of the petition, site plan, and other documents re- lated to this request may be examined In the office of the Department of Planning and Zonin0, located in Room 600 of the Roanoke County Adminis- tration Center. Roanoke County will provide as- sistance to handicapped per- sons desiring to attend public hearings. Suchlndividualsare requested to contact the Coun- ty office of Personnel Services ((703) 772-4018) If special Dro- visions are necessary for at- tendance. Given under my hand this SEV- ENTH day of SEPTEMBER, 1988. Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors (10096) ~~ P~ANO,ti-F a ~ ti A 2 ~ ° ~. ~ a ~~~tz~~ ~~ ~ ~zt ~t (~ , 150 ~~~ `i~ `4- ~1-i. 1838 .E.,S 88 S~SDUICENTENN~P~' ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS A (anun~ul (3c~irinin~ ACTION AGENDA SEPTEMBER 27, 1988 Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meeting. Regular meetings are held on the second Tuesday and the fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public Hearings will be heard at 7:00 p.m on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. AFTERNOON SESSION f3.00 P M 1 A- OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.) 1. Roll Ca11. 2. Invocation: The Reverend Wayne M. Ayers Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints 3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag. B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS_ ADD ITEM DlA - APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENTS AT ADMINISTRATION CENTER AND BEAUTIFICATION PROJECT AT 419-220 INTERSECTION. ADD ITEM D7 - AUTHORIZATION TO SETTLE LITIGATION WITH VALLEY DEVELOPERS. C. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS AND AWARDS D. NEW BUSINESS 1A Approval of funding for improvements to Administration Center and Beautification Project at Routes 221-419 Intersection A-92788-1 LG/SAM TO APPROVE FUNDING OF $3500 FOR BEAUTIFICATION PROJECT ONLY - URC SAM/LG TO REMOVE FROM TABLE ITEM FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO ADMINISTRATION CENTER AYES-SAM, LG NAYS-BLJ, RR, HCN 1. Approval of Emergency Operations Plan and Designation of Director of Emergency Services. A-92788-2 SAM/RR TO APPROVE RESO - URC 2. Approval of Petty Cash Funds for Hazardous Materials Crew. R-92788-3 SAM/RR TO APPROVE WITH CREDIT CARD LIMIT OF $1500 AYES-BLJ, RR, SAM, LG NAYS-HCN 3. Approval of the 1988-89 Legislative Package. A-92788-4 BLJ/SAM TO APPROVE WITH ADDITIONAL REQUEST FROM CLERK OF CIRCUIT COURT - URC 4. Request for Support for United Way Campaign. A-92788-5 HCN/RR TO APPROVE - URC 5. Acceptance of easements for installation of dry hydrants in the Bent Mountain and Catawba areas. A--92788-6 SAM/LG TO APPROVE - URC 6. Direction to Planning Commission and staff on priorities for revision of the County Zoning Ordinance. A-92788-7 SAM/BLJ TO APPROVI ALT. ~1 AYES-BLJ, RR, SAI•i NAYS-LG, HCN 7. Authorization to settle litigation with Valley Developers A-92788-8 HCN/LG TO AUTHORIZE - URC 2 E. REQUEST FOR WORK SESSIONS WORK SESSION SET FOR 11/9/88 ON COUNTY SPACE NEEDS INCLUDING SCHOOL ADMINISTRATION F. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Request for Public Hearing on October 11, 1988 to borrow money in anticipation of taxes. BLJ/SAM TO SET FOR 10/11/88 UVV G. APPOINTMENTS 1. Building Code Board of Adjustments and Appeals. 2. Community Corrections Resources Board 3. Court Service Unit Advisory Council/Youth and Family Services Advisory Board 4. Grievance Panel S. Mental Health Services of the Roanoke Valley, Community Services Board. 6. Industrial Development Authority SAM NOMINATED J. RICHARD CRANWELL H_ REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS JOHNSON EXPRESSED SYMPATHY OVER THE DEATH OF WILLIAM CUNDIFF, FORMER BOARD MEMBER. MCGRAW (1) ANNOUNCED STATISTICAL PROFILE FOR BLUE RIDGE REGION IS NOW AVAILABLE. (2) HAS PUT FORTH HIS NAME FOR 2ND VICE PRESIDENT OF VACO. NICKENS REQUESTED STAFF REPORT ON WHAT IS BEING DONE FOR ASBESTOS REMOVAL ON DEMOLl':iON PERMIT. NICKENS/MCGRAW MOTION DIRECTING PAUL MAHONEY TO WRITE THE CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICERS AND REQUEST IN WRITING WHETHER THEY WISH TO REMAIN A PART OF ROANOKE COUNTY'S PAY AND CLASSIFICATION PLAN AND ABIDE BY THE RULES OF THE EMPLOYEE HANDBOOK , GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE AND OTHER EMPLOYEE REGULATIONS. REQUESTED RESPONSES BE BROUGHT BACK TO BOARD ON 10/25/88 - UW 3 ROBERS ADVISED THAT 30 PARTICIPANTS FROM ROANOKE VALLEY AND 50 PARTICIPANTS FROM NORTHERN VIRGINIA WILL ATTEND NORTHERN VA. DAY. THANKED THOSE WHO WORKED ON THE PROJECT. REQUESTED THAT THE BOARD APPOINT TWO MEMBERS TO SERVICE ON A COMMITTEE TO STUDY CONSOLIDATION ISSUES AND ESTABLISH PUBLIC HEARINGS FOR CITIZEN INPUT - TABLED FOR FUTURE MEETING. I. CONSENT AGENDA ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY. R-92788-9 BLJ/SAM WITH #5 REMOVED FOR DISCUSSION UW 1. Resolution recognizing October 24, 1988 as Community Action Day. R-92788-9.a 2. Approval of Resolution of Support for House Joint Resolution establishing low cost health care coverage for school and local government employees. R-92788-9.b 3. Request for acceptance of Byers Road into the Va. Department of Transportation Secondary System. R-92788-9.c 4. Approval of a Raffle Permit from the Cave Spring High School PTSA. A-92788-9.d 5. Ree~t~est-€e~-$pp~aprietien-few-desie~n-phase-e€ Spring-He~~a~v-Reserveir- REMOVED FOR DISCUSSION 6. Transfer of roads from Va. Department of Transportation to City of Salem. A92788-9.e 4 A-92788-10 ITEM 5 - HCN/SAM TO APPROVE AFTER DISCUSSION- URC J. CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS NONE K. REPORTS RR/SAM TO RECEIVE AND FILE UVV 1. Report on Recycling Project 2. Reserve for Board Contingency 3. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance 4. General Fund Unappropriated Balance L. EXECUTIVE SESSION pursuant to the Code of Virginia 2.1-344 (a) (7) legal matter with Fifth Planning District Commission and (3) to discuss a real estate matter involving the landfill. LG/ AT 4:20pm 5-15 PM BLJ/SAM TO GO FORWARD WITH SURVEY, BORING AND TESTING OF THE POTENTIAL LANDFILL SITES - URC EVENING SESSION (7:00 P.M.) M. PUBLIC HEARINGS 988-1 Petition of Occidental Development Corporation to rezone a 24.94 acre tract from R-1, Residential to R-3, Residential to construct multifamily dwellings located immediately west of the intersection of Colonial Avenue (Route 720) and Ogden Road (Route 681) in the Cave Spring Magisterial District. RR/SAM TO APPROVE 5 WITH PROFFERED CONDITIONS AYES-BLJ,RR,SAM,HCN NAYS-LG 988-2 Petition of Chaparral Forest Associates to rezone a 2.97 acre tract from R-1, Residential to R-5, Residential to construct townhomes, located on the north side of Chaparral Drive {Route 800) approximately 300 feet west of its intersection with Beacon Drive in the Cave Spring Magisterial District. (CONTINUED FROM JUNE 28, 1988) RR/SAM TO DENY AYES-BLJ, RR, SAM, LG NAYS-HCN HCN REQUESTED A REPORT ON THE CHANGES TO LAND USE PLAN SINCE IT WAS ADOPTED. HCN REQUESTED EXPLANATION AND DESCRIPTION OF "EXCEPTIONAL HOUSING DESIGN OR SITE PLANNING TECHNIQUES" ADDRESSED IN STAFF REPORT 988-3 Petition of CBL Management Inc requesting rezoning from M-1 Industrial, to B-2 Business of a tract containing 4.13 acres to construct a shopping center located on the west side of Merriman Road (Route 613) approximately 100 feet south of Starkey Road (Route 904) in the Cave Spring Magisterial District. (CONTINUED FROM JULY 26, 1988) HCN/SAM TO APPROVE WITH PROFFERED CONDITIONS AYES-BLJ, SAM, HCN, LG NAYS-RR 988-4 Petition of Richard and Tamara Carrell for a Use Not Provided For Permit to operate a dog boarding kennel and conduct obedience training classes in addition to a residence on a 3.079 acre tract located immediately east of the terminus of Old Virginia Springs Road (Route 667) in the Vinton Magisterial District. HCN/SAM TO APPROVE WITH PROFFERED CONDITIONS - URC 988-5 Petition of Daniel R. Duffy to rezone a 0.343 acre tract from B-1 Business to B-2 Business to construct a dry cleaning business located on the west side of Brambleton Avenue (Route 221) approximately 1,000 feet north of its intersection with Colonial Avenue (Route 720) in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District. LG/HCN TO APPROVE WITH PROFFERED CONDITIONS - URC 988-6 Petition of The Secretary of the Roanoke County Plannincx Commission to amend the Land Use Plan: Future Land Use map designation from Core to Principal Industrial of a tract of Land located north of the intersection of US 460 and Cloverdale Road (Route 604), east of Kingsmen Road (Route 608) and south of the border of the counties of Roanoke and Botetourt in the Hollins Magisterial District. BLJ/HCN TO APPROVE URC 988-7 Petition of the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors to rezone a portion of a 24.78 acre tract from R-E Residential Estates to M- l, Industrial for a buffer yard and construction of a mail order distribution center, located immediately east of Cloverdale Road (Route 604) and Kingsmen Road (Route 608) in the Hollins Magisterial District. BLJ/SAM TO APPROVE WITH PROFFERED CONDITIONS - URC 0. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance amending Chapter 17, Procurement Code, Article II, Competitive Procurement Division 4. Small Purchases concerning small purchases. SAM/RR TO APPROVE 1ST READING 2ND - 10/11/88 AYE S -BLJ, RR, SAM, LG NAYS-HCN 2. Ordinance accepting an offer and authorizing the conveyance of a right of way and easement to Appalachian Power Company - Vista Forest. HCN/SAM TO APPROVE 1ST READING 2ND - 10/11/88 URC 3. Ordinance authorizing acres from Salem Stone Turner Estate. the acquisition of 4.199 Corporation and James M. 7 HCN/SAM TO APPROVE 1ST READING SUBJECT TO THE AMOUNT AND SOURCE OF FUNDS BEING AVAILABLE BY 2ND - 10/22/88 - URC P. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES Q. CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS 1. Mr. Richard Evans to speak concerning the Utility Billing Ordinance. SAM/HCN DIRECTED COUNTY ATTORNEY AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATION TO STUDY THE ORDINANCES AND REPORT BACK ON 10/11/88 - URC 2. Ms. Angela Webb, representing Clearbrook Civic League, to speak concerning the proposed landfill site 677-9RR located off Route 220. R. ADJOURNMENT AT 9:55 - BLJ/SAM - UVV 8 ACTION # 92788-1 ITEM NUMBER I -,_ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: September 27, 1988 AGENDA ITEM: Request for Improvements at the Administration Center and Approval for Participation in a Valley Beautiful Project COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACRGROUND: Several items relative to the convenience and safety of citizens calling at the Administration Center need attention. The County is also being asked to participate in a beautification project near the Administration Center. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: ° The hallways in the building are very slick and present a safety hazard, particularly to the handicapped. The installation of carpet would reduce the safety hazard and improve the appearance of the building. ° The Administration Center is not adequately identified for those passing by on Brambleton Avenue. ° Signs should be installed to designate entrance and exit paths for the Administration Center parking lot. The absence of such markings present a safety hazard. ° Paving is needed in the two parking lots facing Valley Forge Avenue and to improve handicap access to the Voter Registration office. ° A landscaping project is planned for the island at the intersection of Routes 419 and 221 and is being sponsored by Valley Beautiful. -1- ALTERNATIVES AND IMPP,~TS: - Carpeting for the Administration Center $ 5,000 - Sign at front of Center on Brambleton (estimate) 1,200 - Signs at parking lot 250 - Paving 11,700 - Beautification project 3,500 Total 21 S'C L% If~~ Funding for this project would be from the Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the improvement projects. SUBMITTED BY: • 1'. Donnie C. Myer Assistant County Administrator Management Services APPROVED: E mer C. Ho ge County Administrator ------------ -------------------------------- ACTION --- VOTE Approved (x) Motion by: Lee Garrett/Steven No Yes Abs Denied ( ) A. McGraw o approve un ing Garrett x Received ( ) o or Beauti ication Johnson x Referred ro~ec ram eton Avenue, McGraw x _T to on Y Nickens x Robers x cc: File John Chambliss Don My ers John Hubbard Reta B usher --_--Diane_ Hyatt --------------------------- --------------- -------- Denied X Motion by Steven A. McGraw/ SAM, LG - Yes Lee Garrett to remove from Table BLJ, RR, HCN - No Item for Improvements to Administration Center -2- I I i I~ i I I I I 1 t I I I I i I I I I I I 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I I j ' w ~n/JfJ // Q ~ J` O p ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ \~ ~ ~ 1 ~~, G '1 V '~+ n . Y \~ ,~o 11 0 1j ~ ,~ ~1 ~u ~ ~ ~ ~' I~ ~ 11 11 '~' ~ ~p R `~Z ~ ` V ~ `~ ~ I l l t~ l ~:- ,__ ,~ V ~~J '\ .~ .~ ~~ ~~ { aV ~ (~ Vu ,: I I f `. I I ~. ~'. `) ~ ~ /~ V .~~, . is -3- f . ~ ~~ I! I ~. ~ ~! i!!! I! I I! I I I I! I! I '~ I i 1 I I I!! I I i! I!! I!~~! ~ ~ I! I~ I i i i I! i ~ ! ~. ~ `J .. ' o - ~ o _ 0 O O i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~p,~ ~ ~T. \~ ~ ~ -~ _~ ~ ,~ 1~ Y ' ~ ~ c II , ~ II ~ N ~I -I. ~ ~ ~ 7 1 ~ ~ ,~ n k `\,, I i °' `1 II II ~' ~' ~ r ~ ~ " ~ o ~ ~ f i l l i. I I V ~fi~J '\ •h .r~ ~i /1\~ ` `~ { `~V C ~ (~ Vv / ~J T o y c ~ ,~ C ~'~ ~ r` ` ~ a° Y \ ~ p~ ~~ J ~ I ~ _ ~ c6 `/ Aso I ~ / ~/ /~ ~~ 4~ ~, ~µ ^~.'I r! ~; ~ ~ ~~ t, ~ I C ~ ~ ~e I {~ I, I ~ ~ I ~Y I~ ~;~ ~, I ~ `;C. ,~, 1 ~, Di N' , ,, a ~iJ ~ ~ f 1 ~- F "y~~(t V \V . -3- IL n ~ _ _ ~ O n 1 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ _1 ' ~ ~ (~ . I ;, V ~ (~ ~ ~ ~ '~ , . .b ~ ~ II o `~ ~ ~ h ~ .]\. ~ o u ~ ~I `o ~ ~~ - ~ ~ it i ~ ~ ° ,T ~~J .h .~ ~~ ~` ~~ l ~1 ~U J a ~ Vu Vv l J T ~ ~ ?~ :~, - C' ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ _ \it \ ~ ~ ~ ~ k9 ,\ J ~, - \~'° ~ ~,~ , ~',~ I ~° -, e. ~' }'~` ~ ~" ~7 ~ ~ N }I I dx ;a ~~ ~ I 3.i { f j ` ~ ~ ~ ~ ~w ~~:~ w ~ '~ t I ~: I ?~ ~;~ ~~~ I ~~~~ ~ ~t ~ ~',j ~~ I ~ ~ ~'~ I I ~ .~ ~ ~~ ~~i ~. I~ I .v . ~~ I I I i l i l~ l l l l l! I I I i i I I I ~ i I I I~ I I I I I I i l i~ ~ l i l l i i i ~. ~ -3- ` ~ ~ n i1 O ~' ; .;. ,,_; 4bj•'. 'OO ~\ d ~ '~ ~ ~\ _1` 1^ 1• ~ 'I 1 Y 11 0 ~ 4 h ~ J ~ ~ ~ ~I ~ .. I ~ I I 1 '~' ~' 4 R ~. ~ ~ r \ ~ ~ ~, ~h ~ I ~ ~ ~ Q ;r I 1 I ~, ~ 1 I ' `~ N. ~~ .h ~~ ~` ~~ ~ ~1 ~V ('J a ~ vu Vv h 1 .~ \~ I J ~ o v >~ ~' ~ ~ ~ ~~ C ~ °~ ~,~ ,}. ~- A ~ ~,. ".?. cp -~ ! ~' J ~ Aso I ~'; ~~ r I ~~~ I ~ ~,~ ~~., s ~ ~~ > ~' ~~~ ~G n ~ jr= ~~~, '~~ ,~ : ~ ~ ~. ~ ~ Iv ~L~ -3- Iti ~! O \ ~ Q ~ Q ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ,~ ~ tt V ..~ Q' 0 C'( ~ \ Q II o ~ II 0 v, ~ ~ ~~~ i. ~ ~ 7 ~ o `~ ~ n ~ ~ II I II 11 "~ Q '~' ~~ 4 ~o ~. ~ ~ n ~ ~ ~ o ~, 1 ~ 1 1 i n i l '?. ~ a ~ ~~ •h ~~ ~~ l ~ ~D J a ~ (~ Vv -\, ~J T C ~ - ,~ . ~- ~ J ~ a~ ' ~y er. `~ i ~ I ~ t i ~ J ~~ ~/ ~~- I I 1 ~~ ~ i l~ l l l ~ i~ i i i l i l l l l i l l i i i i l l i t l l l! i l l i i l! I I I~~ I I I I! i i i i i i I ii _... _ ~~t l !~ i i i~ i 1 ~ .. I v ~~ -3- . ~ ~ ~, , I I I!~! i i I i I I!! I I I I I I I I I I I I i I I I I~ I I I I i I I I I I I I „~, I I~ I i i i l i ~~~ _.... - - _ ~t-- -- -- -- -- - -- C ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .1 4 ~ .., O 'O b O ~L.\ ~I ` \ ~ '\ _~ ~ '~ " ~ ~ f ~ ~ ~ ~ O 1' ~ ~ II o 4 ~ it y ~ ~ ~ 1 7 ~ o o `~ ~ n ~ II i ~' 4 ~ it ~ ~ ~l ~ , r ~ ~ \' ° ~ ' 1 1 i, i l ~' ~~ h ~~ ~` ~~ ~ ~U J ~ ~ VJ Vv \~ / _J / T o ~ c ~ ~ ~~, . C ~ ~ ~ \ J ~ a~ \ ~ ~ c'~ ~ 1 ~ J ~ ~~ ~ i i i ~ 1 ~~; 1 `J __ ~ ~ r ~~ ~. r _ E k 1 ~' r` ty k ~ } ~ pl `~ ' ~ ~ r}~ ~~ ~ .~ I t, . o t a 4 ~' I '~ ~ 1 ,, ~~~ ~ 63 `~~~, v~ I f v \~ . -3- ~_ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~) O ~ ; ;>. Q ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ,^ ~ ~ ~ "1 ~~ ~ a II II o ~ ,~ h ~ ~ ~ II ~ ~ ~ (\ ~ , ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I I I °' 4 ~0 II 4 II \4 ~ '~ °° ,~ n ~ ~ ` 4 ~ ~ ~ I I d I ~ I o i n 1 i e l 01 ~ ~ U ~' •h .~ ~~ ~, ~'~ { J ~U ~ Vu VV \\ ~J / ~ ~ o <;, ~ =; ~: ~'~ ~'" ~ _ ~ ~ ao \ ~ a ~ ~~ I / ~';~ ~~~ `~~~~~- ~ ._ ,~ t ;, ;1 .~ .~~~ ~~ i~ I! I I!~ i I i i i I I! I I I I I I t ~ l l l I i i I I I~ I I I l i l i l l l~ ~!! ~. I t l i! l i! l i i ~, _1L-- __/ ..... ~~~ V ~~ -3- r - a ACTION # ITEM NUMBER ~ -~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: September 27, 1988 SUBJECT: Approval of Emergency Operations Plan COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:. ~.~ct-~..~ ;{,~..iZtt c`t~l-cti.,~rt."" a/ W ~K n`~.-n~J.'G~% t.,i v~~ ~./~'"~l7-+'L-~ BACKGROUND: The Commonwealth of Virginia Emergency Services and Disaster Law of 1973 requires every locality to have in place an Emergency Operation Plan. Further, the Federal Emergency Management Agency requires local government adoption of the Emergency Operations Plan in order to receive Emergency Management Assistance (EMA) funding. Currently Roanoke County participates in this program and receives approximately $8,000 annually in EMA funding. In order for EMA funding to continue, Roanoke County's Emergency Operation Plan must be adopted no later than September 30, 1988. A copy of the proposed plan has been provided under separate cover. Essentially during disasters, the plan provides for continuity of government, direction and control of emergency operations, safety, security, emergency public information, disaster assistance, and recovery. The proposed plan has been coordinated with emergency services organizations, i.e., Fire, Rescue, Sheriff's Office, Red Cross, Health Department, Social Services, and State Department of Emergency Services, along with other County departments, i.e., Community Services and Development, school system, etc. ALTERNATIVES AND IMPACTS: 1. Adopt the proposed Emergency Operations Plan and direct the Chief of Fire and Rescue, currently the County Emergency Services Coordinator, to make required changes to maintain plan. 2. Adopt the proposed Emergency Operations Plan and require Board approval of any and all changes to the plan. 3. Discontinue participation in the EMA funding program. STAFF RECOMr1ENDATION Staff recommends approval of Alternative 1. Respectfully submitted, C~ .u ~/ Tho a C. uqua artment Chi f of Fire & escue Dep Approved by, ~-/ 1 www Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - VOTE - - - - - - ACTION No Yes Abs Approved ( ) Motion by: Garrett Denied ( ) Johnson Received ( ) McGraw Referred Nickens Robers To ps AT THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 27, 1988 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING ADOPTION OF EMERGENCY OPERATIONS PLAN FOR ROANORE COUNTY BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors is greatly concerned with the health, safety, and well-being of its citizens and desires that the best possible emergency services be available to them; and WHEREAS, the Commonwealth of Virginia Emergency Services and Disaster Law of 1973 requires that each city and county develop and maintain an Emergency Operations Plan which addresses its planned response to emergency situations; and WHEREAS, such a plan has been developed by County staff in coordination with the Virginia Department of Emergency Services with input from responsible local agencies. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors that, on the 27th day of September, 1988, it does hereby officially adopt the Roanoke County Emergency Operations Plan, to include plans and procedures for both peacetime and war-caused disasters. AT THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 27, 1988 R E S O L U T I O N 9 2 7 8 8- 2 AUTHORIZING ADOPTION OF EMERGENCY OPERATIONS PLAN FOR ROANORE COUNTY BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors is greatly concerned with the health, safety, and well-being of its citizens and desires that the best possible emergency services be available to them; and WHEREAS, the Commonwealth of Virginia Emergency Services and Disaster Law of 1973 requires that each city and county develop and maintain an Emergency Operations Plan which addresses its planned response to emergency situations; and WHEREAS, such a plan has been developed by County staff in coordination with the Virginia Department of Emergency Services with input from responsible local agencies. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors that, on the 27th day of September, 1988, it does hereby officially adopt the Roanoke County Emergency Operations Plan, to include plans and procedures for both peacetime and war-caused disasters. On motion of Supervisor McGraw, seconded by Supervisor Robers and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, McGraw, Nickens, Robers, Garrett NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: `~~ _~ . Mary H. A11en, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Thomas C. Fuqua, Chief of Fire & Rescue Departmen AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRCENTER ONLTUESDAYE SEPTEMBER 27TY1988INISTRATION RESOLUTION 92788-3 ESTABLISHING PETTY CASH FUNDS FOR THE HAZARDOUS MATERIALS TEAM WHEREAS, the County of Roanoke is responsible for staffing and training a Hazardous Materials Team, to service Southwest Virginia; and WHEREAS, the nature of this assignment requires that the team respond to emergencies which may involve unanticipated travel; and WHEREAS, a fund needs to be established to pay for expenses such as lodging, meals and supplies which result from those emergency calls. THEREFORE, be it resolved that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby establishes two $100 petty cash funds and authorizes two charge cards to pay for expenses incurred by the Hazardous Materials Team in responding to emergency calls in connection with its duties and assignments. On motion of Supervisor McGraw, to approve with credit card limit of $1,500.00, seconded by Supervisor Robers and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES• Supervisors Johnson, McGraw, Robers, Garrett NAYS: Supervisor Nickens A COPY TESTE: ~Q~-/~_ cc• File Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk T. C. Fuqua Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Diane Hyatt Reta Busher ITEM NUMBER ~ - '2' AT A REGULAR MEELDNATOTHEHROANOKE OCOUNTYEADMINISTRATIONNCENTER COUNTY, VIRGINIA H MEETING DATE: September 27, 1988 AGENDA ITEM: Petty Cash for Hazardous Materials Crew COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: p ~ BACKGROUND: The County of Roanoke is responsible ing a Hazardous Materials team to service area based upon a contract that we have Virginia. The nature of this assignment leave town on a moment's notice•mealse made for the expenses of lodging, that result from these calls. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: for staffing and train- the Southwest Virginia made with the State of requires that the team arrangements need to be and emergency supplies In order to provide lodging, meals, and other emergency supplies, the Hazardous Matca h fDndsrofe$1OOoeachland 2ocharge tain two separate petty cards. The Emergency ServCha.r efcards.W1ThebCountyoof1Roanoke the petty cash and the g Finance Department will wlinesltwhich ensureo theainternal Dcop trol ment to establish guide funds. and accountability of the County STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Establish two $100 petty cash funds and authorize two charge cards for the Hazardous i"IesethatshaveabeennreceMvedefr m the State t revenu aside from gran for Hazardous Materials. Respectfully submitted, ~~,.,<, D. ~,~ Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance Approved by, Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ~ -2 ----------- -------------------------------- VOTE ACTION No Yes Abs Approved ( ) Motion by: Garrett Denied ( ~ Johnson Received ( ) McGraw Referred Nickens To Robers • . "' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 27, 1988 RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING PETTY CASH FUNDS FOR THE HAZARDOUS MATERIALS TEAM WHEREAS, the County of Roanoke is responsible for staffing and training a Hazardous Materials Team to service Southwest Virginia; and WHEREAS, the nature of this assignment requires that the team respond to emergencies which may involve unanticipated travel; and WHEREAS, a fund needs to be established to pay for expenses such as lodging, meals and supplies which result from these emergency calls. THEREFORE, be it resolved that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby establishes two $100 petty cash funds and authorizes two charge cards to pay for expenses incurred by the Hazardous Materials Team in responding to emergency calls in connection with its duties and assignments. ACTION # 92788-4 ITEM NUMBER __~~ "~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: September 27, 1988 AGENDA ITEM: 1989 Roanoke County Legislative Package COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR' S COMMENTS: y. J F~~ ~,crr~s~Z.c>^-c~ Gt-c ~ °~ ' ~ BACKGROUND: Over the past two months the members of the Board of Supervi- sors, the County School Board, the Constitutional Officers, and key department heads have developed a package of legislative ini- tiatives for the 1989 session of the Virginia General Assembly. The attached document is a compilation of these various legisla- tive requests as refined at your work session of September 13, 1988. A breakfast meeting has been scheduled for Thursday, Octo- ber 6, 1988, from 7:30 a.m. to 9:00 a.m. at Sunnybrook Inn to provide an opportunity for. the Board of Supervisors, County School Board, and Constitutional Officers to discuss these legis- lative initiatives with the members of the Roanoke Valley legisla- tive delegation. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board adopt the attached legisla- tive program for the 1989 session of the Virginia General Assem- bly. Respectfully submitted, ~~` ' ~ ~. Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney ----------------- VOTE ---------------- ACTION No Yes Abs Approved ~ ) Motion by: Bob L. Johnson/Steven x Garrett Denied ( ) A McGraw to approve with Johnson x -- Received ( ) additional re uest for Clerk McGraw x Referred of Circuit Court - Nickens x To Robers x cc: File Paul Mahoney ~-3 TABLE OF CONTENTS •••••••••..•.••••1 ., •••••••••. TOP PRIORITY ISSUE .••••••• " ' • .•••••...•..•.•..l on Prepared Food and Beverages • " " " ' • • " • • " • ~ • ~ • Tax . ...................2 ... ~ •.• OTHER PRIORITY ISSUES •••••••• " '" " ~~ •••.••.•••.•..•..•.2 . •••••••• Solid Waste Management ......... •• .............3 One-Half Cent Local Option. Sales Tax ••••••••• " " " '• .. ~•••• ................. .4 Health Care Coverage ••••••••• " " " " ~•~~~ . ....................5 . LEGISLATIVE REQUESTS ........................... .. ....................5 Education ............................ ..................8 Fire and Emergency Services • • • • • • • • " " • " ' • • • ..... ....................9 . Law Enforcement .....................• .... ...................11 .... Social Services ................ ................,12 Local Government Cooperation •••••• " " " " •••• .. ....................1~' .. Youth Haven II ........................ ...... ....................14 Other ......................... '~ TOP PRIORITY ISSUE Tax on Prepared Food and Beverages The 1988 Virginia General Assembly adopted Section 58.1-3833 which authorized any county "to levy a tax on food or beverages sold for human consumption and consumed on such premises not to exceed four percent of the amount charged for such food and beverages." Cities are empowered by their charters to levy a meal's preparation (restaurant) tax, and these charter provisions do not limit the levy of such a tax to only meals consumed on premises. The Joint Legislative Audit and Review Commission recommended in House Document No. 15 of the 1984 Gen- eral Assembly that the taxing authority of counties and cities be equalized. Roanoke County strongly supports equal taxing authority as a matter of equi- ty as well as a means of reducing local fiscal stress. It is requested that the General Assembly amend Section 58.1-3833 to delete the restrictive language limiting the imposition of such a tax by counties to food and beverages "consumed on such premises." In the alterna- tive, it is requested that the General Assembly amend the Roanoke County Charter, Section 2.02 (1986, Chapter 617) to provide this authority. 1 / / /~ OTHER PRIORITY ISSUES Solid Waste Management One of the more critical issues facing local governments in the Common- wealth of Virginia is the disposal of solid waste. A comprehensive legisla- tive approach outlining the duties and responsibilities of the state and local governments to address solid waste management issues is necessary. The survey of litter data and the placement of litter receptacles as autho- rized by Article III, of Title 10.1 (Section 10.1-1414, et seg.) barely addresses the problem. A statewide initiative mandating recycling of waste material and the process of separating waste material from the waste stream and processing it for reuse is critical. Enabling legislation authorizing localities to curb the flow of solid waste is necessary. A comprehensive State-wide series of legislative initiatives to address solid waste management issues is necessary. These initiatives would include amendments to the Virginia Public Procurement Act (Chapter 7 of Title 11 of the Code of Virginia) authorizing a preference for recycled goods, State funding incentives for regional cooperative agreements for active recycling programs, statutory prohibition against certain plastic or styrofoam disposal containers, and deposits for cans and bottles. This request would require the repeal of Section 10.1-1425, which supersedes and preempts any local ordinance which attempts to regulate the size and type of any container or package containing food or beverage or whicYi requires a deposit on a disposal container or package. 2 .~-3 One-Half Cent Local Option_Sales Tax Roanoke County supports the adoption of enabling legislation authoriz- ing local governments to impose a one-half cent sales tax to be imposed by local option. The failure of the state to fully fund mandated programs i.n the areas of education, social services, and health have placed tremendous fiscal strains upon local government budgets. Reduced federal funding as a result of the elimination of revenue sharing and the limitations of the Graham-Rudman-Hollings Act places additional stress upon the fiscal. re- sources of local governments. A local option increase in the sales tax. would allow local governments in the Commonwealth of Virginia to better respond to the needs for increased services. The County urges the General Assembly to recognize its responsibility in this area and to either direct- ly provide State funding for these mandated programs or to adopt permissive legislation allowing local governments to achieve new sources of local reve- nue. In the Roanoke Valley new sources of local revenue could be utilized for education, flood control, storm water runoff and drainage, or economic development. 3 ,~ " Health Car_ e Co°er.a_~e House Joint Resolution No• 63 (1988 General Assembly) continued the study of health care coverage alternatives for school employees. 1'h is joint Senate and House subcommittee was to consider these alternatives, as well as consider health care coverage alternatives for local constitutional officers and employees of local government, and to submit its recommenda- tions to the 1989 session of the General Assembly. Roanoke County supports the study by this joint sub-committee and meaningful, cost-effective urges the General Assembly to provide uniform, health care coverage alternatives for school employees, local r_onstitution- al officers, and employees of local government. 4 ~-3 LEGISLATIVE REQUESTS Education Roanoke County requests the General Assembly to address the following issues as they relate to public education: 1. That the State fund kindergarten on a full-day basis. The State currently funds kindergarten on a one-half day basis for all school divisions. 2. That the State review the education funding formula, specifically in the following areas. a. Vocational Education - Roanoke County lost $37,000 in fiscal 1988-89 compared to 1987-88. For example vocational teachers who coordinate such programs as marketing education and coop- erative office education for three periods are calculated as one teaching period for state reimbursement. b, Transportation - Roanoke County lost $190,919 compared t.o the previous year. "Indexing" of transportation funding re- sulted in reducing the amount paid by the State by one-half, from $33 million to $16 million. In both Vocational Educa- tion and Transportation, the new funding formula has folded these areas of concern into the basic State aid provisions instead of categorically funding these programs as was done under the old formula. c. Middle School - State funding formulas should recognize the middle school curriculum and staffing needs. Standards of. 5 `~ Quality are requiring; the middle school curriculum to be im- plemented over the next three years; yet, there is no recogni- tion of the increased cost for funding, i.e. middle school grades 6 and ~ should be funded at 25 to 1 not 35 to 1 as is presently being done. 3, Capital Outlay and Debt. Service - The State funding formula for education should include capital costs and debt service in its provisions. This would include not only new construction but also debt service on old construction. This would enable locali- ties to address the serious fiscal stress for renovation of older facilities, including asbestos removal. State lottery proceed could be allocated for this program. 4, Roanoke County requests the General Assembly to fully fund fringe benefits (VSRS, social security, etc.) for teachers and other school personnel. The State has reduced its portion of payment for fringe benefits to 95%. It is scheduled to reduce its share to 85% next year and to reduce: this amount at a rate of 10°~ per annum until the State will only pay 55% of fringe benefit costs. Each 10% reduction in State reimbursement will cost Roanoke County approximately $100,000. Consideration should also be given to removing the "1981 cap" on State funding of fringe bene- fits for noninstructional personnel. 5, Roanoke County requests the General Assembly that if it mandates educational programs that it provide 1001 of the funding for such programs. Specifically, Roanoke County opposes on the merits the educational program for four year olds. If the General Assembly mandates such preschool program then Roanoke County requests the 6 '~ General Assembly to fu.l_y fund th:i.s mandate including the capita i. costs required for construction. c,r renovation of new facilities. 6. Roanoke County requests continued State funding assistance for. the Governor's School. The Governor's School is an innovative, educational program utilized by all of the local governments in or adjacent to the Roanoke Valley. Tt provides an enhanced educa- tional environment: for selected high school students in mathema- tics and the sciences. Grant funding for this program is sched- uled to expire in the current fiscal year. 7, Roanoke County requests the General Assembly to continue State funding for the Regional Special );ducation Board. This Board serves the school divisions of Roanoke, Botetourt, Craig, Frank- lin and the cities of Roanoke and Salem and is a regional. coopera- tive effort to address the special education needs of our child- ren. 8. Roanoke County requests the General Assembly to repeal Section 22.1-79.1, which requires each local school board to set its school calendar so that the first day students are required to attend school shall be after Labor Day. This provision was first adopted in 1986, and in 1.988 the General Assembly repealed the limitation that would require this section to expire on July 1, 1988. Colleges and universities have gone to earlier openings (e,g. VPI/SU and the community colleges opened August 20 anti 25, 1988.) 9. Roanoke County requests tYie continuation of enrollment loss fund- ing. 7 Fire and Emer enc~__Services Roanoke County requests the rE:peal df lhe. sunset provision of the Fire Program Funds legislation adopted by the 1985 General Assembly (Chapter 545). This provision expires on July l., 1990. Section 38.2-402 establishes a fire programs fund. This fund is main- tained by an assessment upon all licensed insurance companies doing busi- ness in the Commonwealth of Virginia in the amount of 8/lOths of one per- cent of total direct gross premium income. Seventy-five percent of the total amount collected is allocated to localities for the improvement of volunteer and salaried fire services. These funds are used solely for the purposes of fire service training, constructing, improving, and expanding regional fire service training facilities, purchasing fire fighting equip- ment or purchasing protective clothing and protective equipment. for fire fighting personnel. This legislation has provided funds for the construction of Roanoke County's Fire and Rescue Training Center. Removal of this sunset clause provision will enable Roanoke County to <:omplete total construction of this training schedule. 8 I.,aw Enforcement 1. Amend the Constitution (Article V].I:I, Section 8) to provide that the proceeds from drug seizures made under State offenses are not set apart entirely to the State Literary Fund, but are allowed to these law enforce- ment activities. 2. Amend Section 14.1-70 to revise the funding ratio for law enforce- ment deputies from 1 per 2,000 to 1 per 1,500 or even possibly 1 per 1,000. 3. Move the State pay level for Deputy Sheriffs from Grade 7 Lo Grade 9 to make the jobs pay comparably with State Police personnel. 4. Amend Section 15.1-90.3 (Acts of Assembly 1988, Chapter 626) to provide that Sheriff's personnel may wear taupe colored shirts as an option to the present requirement for dark brown or white. 5. Amend Section 15.1-90.3 to allow Sheriffs to have t.wo-toned patrol vehicles - taupe over dark brown as an option to the requirement f_or solid dark brown. 6. Amend Section 14.1-105 to provide for an increase in the service fees for civil papers, the present fee structure could be increased by 100% without putting a strain on any of the litigants. 7. Amend Section 46.1-279.O1.C to either eliminate the population minimum or reduce it from 300,000 to 70,000. This sub-section authorizes certain local law enforcement officers to enforce motor vehicle, trailer, or semi-trailer safety requirements regarding defective equipment. 8. Amend Section 18.2-121 to increase the penalty from a Class 1 mis- demeanor to a felony if the property or contents that are damaged eYCeed $500 in value. 9 ~~ g. Roanoke County requests r_he General Assembly to closely scrutinize any legislation that would el.imi.n;tte the Stale Compensation Board. 10 Social Services to fully fund the 1, Roanoke County requests the Genex'al Assembly administration costs for social. services, and to maintain the reimbursement ratio at the 80/20 rate. 2, Roanoke County requests the General Assembly to provide funds for the staff and related administrative costs fir state-mandated new programs and policies, for example: a. Child Protective Services Risk Assessment Policy Effective July 1, 1988 b, Medicaid "Baby Care" Effective July 1, 1988 c, Family focused services d, Increase in grant funding for day care for ADC mothers who are working or who are being trained. For example in the current fiscal year Roanoke County received $40,000 for this mandated program however i. t: requires $75,000 additional funds to complete the current fiscal year at current caseloads. The County pays 10% of this cost, and the State pays 90%. If the State fails to provide its portion of this cost, the County will be required to fund 100% of the amount needed. 11 Local _Go~Ternment Cr,oper. ation Roanoke County supports the conclusions and recommendations of the joint Virginia Association. of Counties and Virginia Municipal League Committee to the Grayson Commission. This joint committee made specific recommendations concerning interlocal cooperation, city-county relations, and town-county relations. Roanoke County supports these l.egislat:ive initiatives to end the expensive and time-consuming divisiveness fostered by the archaic structures of local government in the Commonwealth of Virginia. 12 II ~ /~ Youl_h Haven_ _ Roanoke County requests the General Assembly to direct the Department of Correction to reimburse t11e County for building construction costs in the amount of $72,979.00• These expenditures were approved by the Depart- ment of Corrections, and const,ruc:tion completed and documentation submitted in the Spring of 1987, yet the County is still awaiting reimbursement. Roanoke County requests the General Assembly to authorize an increase in the County's block grant funding from $212,000.00 to $2.26,000.00 per annum for the costs of operating Youth Haven II. Roanoke County requests the General Assembly to direct the reinstate- ment of Weighted Child Care Days funds. These funds are based upon the utilization rate of a program and are in addition to block grant funding. This year these funds were eliminated by the Governor's Office on Budget and Planning. This loss of funding will result in a 7_0-25% increase in local costs for the operation of group homes. 13 ~-3 OthF~r. 1, Roanoke County requests the General Assembly to amend Chapter 7 of Title 42.1 to provide State financial incentives and assistance to estab- lish regional records retention. centers. A regional records retention cen- ter would house the permanent public records of any locality in that region. Roanoke City Circuit Court is already renting off-site space to retain pub- lic records. Roanoke County will soon run out of such space and will be faced with the prospect of renting off-site space for these records. Local- ities are required to maintain and safeguard the ever-growing mountain of permanent, public records. A State-wide program to provide funding incen- tives for regional records retention centers would address this problem as well as promoting inter-governmental local cooperation. 2. Boards of Zoning Appeals.--Roanoke County requests the General Assembly to amend Section 15.1-494 to authorize the appointment of members of local boards of zoning appeals by the local governing body instead of appointment by the circuit court. 3, Citations for Failure to Display a County License.--Roanoke County requests the General Assembly to authorize the commissioner of the revenue or his deputy to issue a summons or citation (similar to the sum- mops authorized by Section 46.1-179.01 f.or violation of local parking ordin- ances) for a violation of a local license ordinance authorized by Section 46.1-65. 14 ACTION # 92788-5 ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: September 27, 1988 AGENDA ITEM: Request for Support for the United Way Campaign COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: /1 ~ ~, ~.~ Y _ 1 Y Z / } ~l V J" _ ` 1///~FA~L~°~~ ~/ SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: This year, the United Way will celebrate its 65th birthday in the Roanoke Valley. The campaign goal for 1988-89 is $4,007,000 which is a 6.7 percent increase over 1987. Thirty-six health and human services organizations throughout the Valley are supported with these contributions. Roanoke County is about to begin its campaign and our goal is $16,000. Don Myers has agreed to serve as Campaign Coordi- nator and is being assisted by Wanda Riley. They will be working with a committee of employees and Loaned Executive Jane Davies to reach the goal established for the County. RECOMMENDATION: The Board is asked to support the United Way of Roanoke Valley by authorizing the County's participation in the campaign and encouraging that County employees be generous with their pledges. ,, , . i E mer C. H ge County Administrator Approved (x) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by: Harry C. Nickens/ Richard W. Robers ACTION VOTE No Garrett Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers Yes Abs x x x x .~ cc: File Don Myers Wanda Riley w A-92788-6 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY MEETING DATE: September 27, 1988 ITEM NUMBER ~ _ 5 SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE ADMINISTRATION CENTER SUBJECT: Acceptance of easements for the installation of dry hydrants for better fire service delivery in Roanoke County in the Bent Mountain and Catawba areas COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: .. ~ , ~/ ~ ~ ~~C.4-rnr~(~~,~- ~0^~2 „ G-. J SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: In September of 1987 the Roanoke County Fire and Rescue Department began a study to determine the best method of providing static water supplies for fire fighting purposes in rural areas. The "Dry Hydrant'" concept of installing fixed fire hydrant assemblies on private property at ponds and lakes was decided upon. This concept ensures that a water supply is available to the County's Fire and Rescue Department in the rural communities of Roanoke County. Seven sites were selected in the Bent Mountain and Catawba communities. Site visits were made, and with the help of the Roanoke County Engineering Department, installation and site drawings were prepared. The property owners have agreed to donate to the County fifteen (15) foot wide easements for the location and construction of the dry hydrants. Easement agreements are currently being processed and when signed and returned the bidding process for installation shall begin. Pursuant to Ordinance No. 1027874 adopted on October 27, 1987, the Board authorized the County Administrator to accept donations or dedications of non-controversial real estate matters. ALTERNATIVES AND IMPACTS: Funding for this project is coming from the 1985 bond issue for fire hydrant installation. Approximately $5,000 will be spent for equipment purchase and contractor installation. Installation will start as soon as possible after bids are received. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Board favorably consider this acceptance by resolution •- -- _ SUBMITTED BY: APPROV /' ~~ ~ ~ ~~ T. C. F q a Elmer C. Hodge, Jr. Chi~f !!` County Administrator -~ ----------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved (x) Motion by: Steven A. McGrawi Denied ( ) Lee Garrett Received ( ) Ref erred To cc: File T. C. Fuqua Diane Hyatt Reta Busher Cliff Craig No Yes Abs ~~bers x Garrett x Johnson x McGraw x Nickens x 92788-7 ACTION # ITEM NUt'iBER ~__,- R t~gEETING OF THE BOARD OUNTYp ADM INISTRATIONACENTER AT A REGULA COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE CO MEETING DATE: September 27, 1988 to Planning Commission and Staff °nOrdinance. Direction Zoning Priorities for Revision of the Coun Y AGENDA ITEP~i: COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR' S COMI~IENTs / Lw`' BACKGROUND : _ ~l"t `'`~"` `"~""~ '`'` At the September 13, p„ Steger addressed in Catawba Valley be ~~~~ ~ ~ ,iyf.C.2'~/1-~"^"~l ~ ~~'fJh'f. ~/7 ~~~~~ A/~~-c/ ~'2S ~- 1988 meeting of the the Board requesting increased• Board of Supervisors, David that the minimum lot sizes SUMMARY OF INFORt1ATI0N: ted in June, 1985, - adop County Comprehensive Plan, in the Rural Preserve The Roanoke the majority of the Catawba Valley reserve existing establishes h degree of protection will p ermitting a Category ~°~here a hig and forestal resourcesa~~ern.p policy agricultural, recreational, unit per low density residential settasmlesspthan 1 limited, very low density ermits Rp-3 of the Plan defines very Ordinance p However, the current Zoning uare feet ( one third acre). five acres. 15,000 sq local have created a concern among development of lots as small as ment in the Va11eY• Recent changes in land ownership Dols and policies esidents ~•aith the potential for small lto theegop Could lead to r In addition, it Such development ~~~ould behensivedPlanry ital improvements not established in the Comp a demand for increased public services and cap presently programmed or anticipated. ALTERNATIVES AND IMPACTS: 1: Alternative No. Ordinance for theuidelinesPfornthe Prepare revisions to the Zrehensive Plan policy g articular attention to Area to implement the Comp orY, with p Rural Preserve land use categ overall density. increasing minimum lot sizes and reducing ,. .. .L ~ CU STA____FF RECOii~ ATION recommended that the Board favorably recommend Alternative No. 1. It is APPROVED BY: SUBMITTED BY: __ . ~~ i Elmer C. Hodge onathan W. Hartley County Administrator acting Zoning Administrator -------------------------------- VOTE ----------------- ACTION No Yes Abs Approved {x) i-iotion by: Steven A. McGraw/ Garrett x Bob L. Johnson to a rove Johnson x D e n i e d t) x _____. Received ( ) Alternative #1 McGraw Referred Nickens x Robers - x T o _____-_ ---- ____---- cc: File Jon Hartley Dale Castellow ACTION # 92788-8 ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: September 27, 1988 AGENDA ITEM: Authorization to settle pending litigation Valle Develo ers Inc. et al. v. Roanoke Count COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND: 1988 the Board of Supervisors held a public On August 23, the condem- hearing and adopted Resolution No. 82388-9 authorizing ublic sewer nation of four Scat se subdivisaonlitThe propertynownep s involved to the Nichols E in the above-referenced litigation are Valley Develope y• nThe James C. Pate and Judy B. Pate, and Barbara W. Bova Cro resolution also provides for authorizationrtoo erties toe begin for an immediate right-of- entry on the P P rsuant to Section construction prior to the condemnation trial, p 15.1-238(e) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended. 1988, the above-referenced property owners On August 25, filed a petition in th15Cir238(d) ofrtheo1950 C de ofyV~rginianoas pursuant to Section amended, praying for entry of an Ord~hehCoartgprhor tora ufull cons do not justify immediate entry by roceeding. The order also prays for a determination demnation p of whether the t e t gn115f lr 238(eblof the CoderofpJi giniauis pose and whether S constitutional. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Valley Developers Inc., et al., have proposed the following settlement offer in order to dismiss their petition and to pre- clude a condemnation action being filed on behalf of Roanoke County: 1. Payment as follows: $ 956.00 Valley Developers 200.00 Pate 1,300.00 Croy 2. Granting of fifteen (15) foot easement to Appalachian Power Company from the County to provide for electrical service to Vista Forest (a development of Valley Developers) across pro- perty owned by the County known as water tank lot, Section 1, Block 1, Forest Edge Subdivision. FISCAL IMPACTS: The sum of $2,456.00 necessary to resolve this litigation is available from sewer line extension project funds. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Board approve and authorize the proposed settlement of the litigation and authorize the County Attorney and the County Administrator to execute such documents and take such actions as may be necessary to accomplish the pur- poses of this settlement. Respectfully submitted, Paul M. County ~~ Mahoney Attorney ------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved (x) Motion by: Harry C Nickens/ No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Lee Garrett Garrett ~ Received ( ) Johnson ~ Referred McGraw _~_ To Nickens __~_ Robers __x_ cc: File Paul Mahoney Diane Hyatt Reta Busher ACTION # ITEM NUMBER ~ _ / AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: September 27, 1988 Request for Public Hearing for Short-Term Borrowing COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The County is anticipating a temporary cash flow shortage in October, 1988 due to temporary advancements that we have made on literary loan projects and the timing of this year's budget capital expenditures. It will be necessary for us to borrow an amount not to exceed $4 million in October, 1988. In order to borrow this money, it is necessary to hold a public hearing on this matter. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff requests that the Board of Supervisors approve advertising for a public hearing to be held on October 11, 1988 authorizing this short-term borrowing in anticipation of tax revenue of an amount not to exceed $4 million. Respectfully submitted, i,.U-~s~. In . ~ c.~. Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance --------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) b No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred To Approved by, L%i~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator Motion y. Garrett Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers ACTION NUMBER /,, ITEM NUMBER ~ ' ~" AT A RIRGINIA~HELDNATOTHE ROANO E COUNTYEADMINISTRATION CENTER COUNTY, MEETING DATE: September 27, 1988 SUB_ Appointments to Committees, Commissions and Boards COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: 1 Building Code Board of Adjustments and A eals Four-year term of Norman Eugene Jarrett, Hollins Magisterial District. His term expired January 22, 1988. 2. Communit Corrections Resources Board One-year term of Edmund J. Kielty, Alternate. Their terms expire August 13, 1988. 3. Court Service Unit Advisor Council Youth and Famil Services Advisorv Board• One-year term of youth member Emily Reaser, Northside High School. Her term expired November 13, 1987. Two-year terms of Marilyn Morehead, Hollins District; Dr. J. Andrew Archer, Vinton District; and Sherry Robison, Windsor Hills District expired 3/22/88. One-year term of Tracy Rothschild, youth member from Cave Spring, expired 3/22/88. APPOINTMENTS TO THIS COMMITTEE HAVE BEEN POSTPONED UNTIL IT IS REACTIVATED. 4. Grievance Panel Three-year term of Cecil Hill, alternate will expire October 12, 1988. Communitv 5 Mental Health Services of the Roanoke Vallev, Services Board Two-year term of Dr. Joseph Duetsch, Member at Large, will expire October 31, 1988. 6 Industrial Development Authority Four-year term of Tom Isenhart, Catawba District. Mr. Isenhart's term expired September 26, 1988. SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: m~~ ~ Mary H. Allen Deputy Clerk ~lY Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ---------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: Yes No Abs Denied ( ) Garrett Received ( ) Johnson Referred McGraw Nickens To• Robers ~-/ BUILDING CODE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS AND APPEALS TERM EXPO S Vinton 4 years 1/22/92 Thomas A. Darnall Reappointed 6/14/88 1010 Halliahurst Avenue Vinton, Virginia 24179 Home: 343-4571 (Architect) Windsor Hills 4 years ~4"~]::~/88~ B. J. King 3512 Brambleton Avenue Roanoke, VA 24018 Work: 774-5083 (Contractor) Spring. Cave 4 years 4/27/92 Jon Walp , 3153-8B Berry Lane,SW Roanoke, Virginia 24018 Home: 774-3289 (Architect) Cave Spring 4 years 10/24/90 Albert Trompeter . 5596 Highfields Road S.W. Roanoke, Virginia 24018 Phone: 774-4445 Vinton 4 years 12/12/90 Wilmore T. Leffell, Pres. Temp-O-Matic Inc. P. O. Box 291 Vinton, VA 24179 (Building Contractor) ALTERNATES 4 years 7/25/90 Larry Lester ` 2920 McNeil Drive Roanoke, Virginia 24019 4 years 7/25/90 John Brownlee 5003 Shadyside Drive Roanoke, VA 24018 Notify Mr Skip Nininger of new appointments - . ~.. COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS RESOURCES BOARD p,. COMPOSITION: (From Bylaws and Section 53.1-183) To consist of seven members appointed as follows: one member from Roanoke County; one member from Salem City; three members from the judges in the 23rd Judicial District; one member from the Department of Cgrrections. The term of office shall be determined by the appointing authority (Roanoke County's is one year . ) B, DUTIES: Review felony referrals from the Circuit Courts of Roanoke City, Roanoke County and the City of Salem for possible diversion from state penal system and local jails. C, MEETINGS: Third Tuesday of each month at 4:00 p.m. ~~ COURT SERVICES UNIT ADVISORY COUNCIL/YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES ADVISORY BOARD A. COMPOSITION Board to consist of two members from each magisterial district, and one youth member from each high school. Governing bodies of each county and city served by a court service unit may appoint one or more members to a citizen advisory council. g, DUTIES: Advises and cooperates with the court upon all matters affecting the working of this law and other laws relating to children, their care and protection and to domestic relations; Consults and confer with the court and director of the court service unit relative to the development and extension of the court service program; Encourage the members selected by the council to serve on the central advisory council to visit as often as the member conveniently can, institutions and associations receiving children under this the chdild~enereceivedtby o~uin chargenoftanys and surroundings of such persons, institutions or associations. The Council should make themselves familiar with the work of the court. Makes an annual report to the court and the participating .governing bodies on the work of the council. A_s the Youth and Family Services Advisory Board: Establish goals and priorities for County-wide youth services; assist in coordination and planning for comprehensive youth services within the private sector. Serve in an advisory capacity and to otherwise assist the Board of Supervisors to establish goals and objectives in compliance with all "minimum Standards of the Delinquency Prevention and Youth Development Act of 1979". Assist in conducting an assessment of the needs of youth every five years and to assist in darti~pla~eainaevaluating Delinquency Prevention Plan, further to p P the implementation of the plan and making a report thereon to the Board of Supervisors. Provide a public forum where concerns about youth may be expressed and to receive recommendations and raise concerns of public and private organizations at any regular advisory board meeting upon proper notice. Advocates necessouth legislative amendments to improve community conditions for y development and to support the development of needed services both public and private for youth in the community. C, MEETING SCHEDULE: One a quarter, the third Tuesday, beginning January; time and place determined at meetings. ~ -y GRIEVANCE PANEL A, COMPOSITION consist of three (3) members, appointed by the Board of To ears . Supervisors; for terms of two y B , DUBS t such rules and procedures as it deems The panel shall adoPThe panel has the responsibility to a lication, and meaning of the necessary and desirable. PP The panel rule on the interpretation, rules and regulations. County's personnel policies, anel chairman, set a time for shall select for each hearing a P rievant which shall be held as soon as practical, but no the hearing s after the g later than fifteen (15) full working day appeal,. C. MEETING SCHEDULE with the The County Administratorvancel arrange a hearing panel members to hear the grie MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES OF THE ROANOKE VALLEY COMMUNITY SERVICES BOARD A, COMPOSITION Board to consist of notu~e(4)tmembersefrom each ofethean fifteen (15) members, with fo jurisdictions based on recommethetCountyfand Citiesaof•Salemband at large must be confirmed by Roanoke. Members may not serve more than two (2) full terms. g, DUTIES_ To serve as Board of Directors for the Ment~lo ramltTo be Mental Retardation and Substance Abuse Services p g State the sole recipient of local tax funds to be mentaldretardation and/or Federal funds for the mrotramseandhhas authority for the and substance abuse services p g expenditure of all said local tax funds allocated to it. Reviews and evaluates community mental health, mental both retardation and substance abuse srovramsofnaommunitylmental public and private. Presents a p g health, mental retardation and substance abuse services and facilities. Appoint an executive director of Mental Heathe department whose qualificaisodutmest tPrescriberasreasonable schedule of and prescribe h fees for services provided by personnel or facilities under t e jurisdiction or supervision of the Board and for the manner of collection of same. Seek and accept funds through State and Federal grants. C, MEETING SCHEDULE: Third Thursday of each month. A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARDNOKESCOUNTYSADMINISTRATOON AT HELD AT THE ROA 1988 COUNTY, VIRGINIA, TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 27r CENTER ON RESOLUTION N0. 92788-9 APPROVING AND CONCURRING INO~ESUPERVISORS AGENDA TH ON THE BOARD FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM I CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1, That that certain section of the agenda of the Su ervisors for September 27- 1988, designated as Item I Board of p _ ant Agenda be, and hereby is- approved and concurred in as Cons nated o each item separately set forth in said section desig t Items 1 through 6, inclusive, as follows: Resolution recognizing October 24, 1988 as 1' Action Day. Community 2. Approval of Resolution of Support for House Joint Resolution establishing low cost health care coverage for school and local government employees. 3, Request for acceptance of Byers Road ing°stem,Va. Department of Transportation Secondary Y 4. Approval of a Raffle Permit from the Cave Spring High School PTSA. ~e ~iatie~-few-des~g~-phase-ef 5. Req~estHallaw~Rese~~ei~- gp~~~~- 6, Transfer of roado City of.Salemrtment of Transportation 2, That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized on any of said and directed where required by law to set forth up he se arate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to items t P this resolution. On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor McGraw with Item 5 removed for discussion. The motion carried with the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors 9/29/88 CC: File Bayes Wilson, Superintendent of Schools Phillip Henry, Director of Engineering Paul Mahoney, County Attorney AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOAROANOKEU COUNTYOADMINISOTRAOTION COUNTY, VIRGINIA. HELD AT THE SEPTEMBER 27, 1988 CENTER ON TUESDAY, RESOLUTION 927 O~UNITY ACTION DAYG OCTOBER 24, 1988, AS C encies have been WHEREAS, the 27 Virginia Community~Action Ag in their effort to offer a "hand up" to millions of unfailing Virginians during the last 23 years; and h ave m ade Action Agencies WHEREAS, Virginia Community oor to help themselves significant advances in assisting the P im roved housing, through education, Job training, P 'zation, health and nutrition services, counseling, and weathers economic development; and REAS, Community Action in Virginia has been supported by WHE s of volunteers (six volunteers to every paid staff thousand councils, action boards, advisory person), serving on community i hborhood organizations and working alongside staff; and ne g WHEREAS, Virginia Community Action Agencies have faithful y ortunity Act by carried out the mandate of the Economic OPP fanning and "strengthening of community capabilities for p services", innovative coordinating", "the better organization of causes of poverty", "maximum feasible approaches in attacking anticipation of the poor"- and "the broadening of the resource P bases"; Action Agencies have established WHEREAS, Virginia Community s as national leaders in the development of innovative themselve Water atewide organizations and programs, such as the Virginia st 1 Project, Virginia Cares, the Virginia Weatherization Program and Project Discovery, Inc.; and WHEREAS, Virginia Community Action Agencies by serving the poorest residents of this great Commonwealth also have served all her citizens; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia recognizes OCTOBER 24, 1988 as Community Action Day throughout the County of Roanoke and Commonwealth of Virginia; That this be an opportunity for the citizenry of Roanoke County to recognize the great accomplishments that have taken place in relieving suffering and helping the poor to become self -sufficient; That all of us rededicate ourselves to the great challenge of building a stronger Virginia through ensuring that everyone has "the opportunity for education and training, the opportunity to work, and the opportunity to live in decency and dignity." On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor McGraw and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, McGraw, Nickens, Robers, Garrett NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: ~12G~--~~. ~ Mary H. len, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Cabell Brand, Chairman, Total Action Against Poverty 2 T / ITEM DUMBER "-_ LAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OFUNTYE ADMINIS,rRATIONNOCENTER AT A REGU COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE C September 27, 1988 MEETING DATE: Action Day Resolution proclaiming Community SUBS-=- COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Governor Baliles isA~tionnDay 1988, as Community resolution proclaiming October 24, throughout the Commonwealth of Virginia. in the Chairman of Total Action Against Poverty s requested that the Board of Supervisors join Cabell Brand, Roanoke Valley ha a resolution to further the epVertY with the Governor in issuing nest to eliminate p Action Agencies in their q of Community for the disadvantaged. FISCAL IMPACT: None RECOMMENDATION: mmended that the Board approve the Resolution an It i s reco forward to Mr. Brand. ~ c,~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator --- ------------------------------ VOTE Ab ----------------------- ACTION No Yes Motion by: proved ( ~ A Garrett hnson p Jo Denied ( ~ McGraw Received ( ~ Nickens Referred Robers T o _~- / ! / AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOAROANOKEUCOUNTYOADMINISOTRATION COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE 1988 CENTER ON TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 27, RESOLUTION RECOGNIZING OCTOBER 24, 1988. AS COM1'~UNITY ACTION DAY Action Agencies have been WHEREAS, the 27 Virginia Community in their effort to offer a "hand up" to millions of unfalling Virginians during the last 23 years; and encies have made Action Ag WHEREAS, Virginia Community the poor to help themselves significant advances in assisting improved housing, through education, job training. tion, health and nutrition services, counseling, and weatheriza economic development; and Action in Virginia has been supported by WHEREAS, Community f volunteers (six volunteers to every paid staff thousands o advisory councils, person), serving on community action boards, ' hborhood organizations and working alongside staff; and rie1g encies have faithfully Action Ag WHEREAS, Virginia Community Act by Economic Opportunity carried out the mandate of the Tanning and "strengthening of community capabilities for p innovative coordinating" , "the better organization of servvices , ~~ maximum feasible approaches in attacking causes of poverty tici ation of the poor", and "the broadening of the resource par P 'gases" ; REAS, Virginia Community Action Agencies have establishe WHE lees as national leaders in the development of innovative themse inia Water statewide organizations and programs, such as the Virg ~-/ Project, Virginia Cares, the Virginia Weatherization Program and Project Discovery, Inc.; and WHEREAS, Virginia Community Action Agencies by serving the oorest residents of this great Commonwealth also have served all p her citizens; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia recognizes OCTOBER 24, 1988 as Community Action Day throughout the County of Roanoke and Commonwealth of Virginia; That this be an opportunity for the citizenry of Roanoke County to recognize the great accomplishments that have taken place in relieving suffering and helping the poor to become self-sufficient; That all of us rededicate ourselves to the great challenge of building a stronger Virginia through ensuring that everyone has "the opportunity for education and training, the opportunity to work, and the opportunity to live in decency and dignity." O~ POANp~F ~,~ Z ~ 2 v ~ a 18 Eso 88 SFSQUICEN7ENN~P A Beauti~ulBeginning C~nun~~ n~ ~n~tnak~ BOARD OF SUPERVISORS COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR September 29 , 1988 ELMER C. HODGE Mr. Cabell Brand, Chairman Total Action Against Poverty Board of Directors P. O. Box 2868 Roanoke, Virginia 24001-2868 Dear Mr. Brand: LEE GARRETT. CHAIRMAN WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT RICHARD W. ROBERS. VICE-CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT STEVEN A. MCGRAW CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT Attached is a copy of Resolution No. 92788-9 concern1nThis recogniiinnwas adooted by~theBBoard ofmSupervisorsoatDtheir resolut o p Se tember 27, 1988. meeting on Tuesday, p If you should need assistance in the future, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, -~r~c~ur, ~/ a,~,u..~-- Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Attachment P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 2 4018-07 9 8 (703) 772-2004 Y AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 27, 1988 RESOLUTION 92788-9.b SUPPORTING THE STUDY BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF HEALTH CARE COVERAGE ALTERNATIVES FOR SCHOOL EMPLOYEES WHEREAS, the 1987 Session of the Virginia General Assem- bly established pursuant to House Joint Resolution Number 250 a joint sub-committee to study health care coverage alternatives for school employees; and WHEREAS, the 1988 Session of the Virginia General Assem- bly continued this joint sub-committee study pursuant to House Joint Resolution Number 63; and WHEREAS, this joint sub-committee heard considerable testimony about wide disparities existing in health insurance coverages provided and employer contributions made by local school boards and the problems school employees are having with this insurance coverage; and WHEREAS, the problems of local constitutional officers and employees of local government are similar to those of school employees; and WHEREAS, the joint sub-committee decided that these issues also should be addressed. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the Board of Supervi- sors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that said Board supports the study by the joint sub-committee and urges the General Assembly to provide uniform, meaningful, cost-effective health care cover- age alternatives for school employees, local constitutional offi- cers, and employees of local government. On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor McGraw and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, McGraw, Nickens, Robers, Garrett NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Roanoke Valley Legislators Bayes Wilson, Superintendent, Roanoke County Schools Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney D. Keith Cook, Director, Human Resources Carolyn Ross, Clerk, Town of Vinton ,z-~. HOUSE JOINT RESOLUTION. NO. 63 Continuing the joint subcommittee studying health care coverage alternatives for school employees. Agreed to by the House of Delegates, February 16. 1988 Agreed to by the Senate, February 25, 1988 the 1987 Session of the General Assembly established, pursuant to House WHEREAS. health care coverage alternatives for Joint Resolution No. 250, a joint subcommittee to study about the wide school employees; and WHEREAS, the joint subcommittee heard co~id rovidedtand employer contributions disparities that exist in the health insurance coverag and the problems school employees are having with their made by local school boards, insurance coverage; and roblems were suggested and conside=o riate WHEREAS. a number of solutions to the P the subcommittee feels t~atd additional information is needed before the most app P in regard to solution can be reached, the subcommittee ~E1tEAS, since problems that local constitutional officers are ha ng their heaithti hues ioocshould be dd wed; tnow,otherefore~be mployees. ,That :the- joint decided tha the Senate concurring.. RESOLVED by the House of ;Delegates, subcommittee established to a9d87 to~ study the health care coverage alternatives for sc o0 dition : to L considering, alternatives for school employees. the employees be continued.• In ,t.••~~_ ,~,,, ; , •„ joint' subcommittee shall consider health .`care coverage • alternatives for local constitutional . -. , :. _ - ' • vacancies officers and employees of local government. The membership of the joint subcommitt =ovidedl a House Join ResolutionyNo. 250 of that occur shall be filled in the manner as P . , :. . . _ •. - •• • • ~•" 1987. • -- - The oint subcommittee shall complete its work in time to submit its recommendati na to the 1989 Session of the General ,~embly. the direct costs shall The Indirect costs of this study are estimated to be 58,5: exceed S2,700. HOUSE JOINT RESOLUTION N6. 64 .... J .... . i ..... . tin the Virginia State Crime Commission to study the• security needs of the uniform Direc g Statewide Building Code. _ .~ - , .*~.. .. - ~ '~' . ,i _:~ -Agreed to by the House of Delegates. February 16, 1988 Agreed to by the Senate, March 9, 1988 WHEREAS. crime in the Commonwealth is of great coacern to sll citizens: and z--z AT A REGULAR MEETING OF TI-IE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, SEP`PEMBER 27, 1988 RESOLUTION SUPPORTING THE STUDY BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF HEALTH CARE COVERAGE ALTERNATIVES FOR SCHOOL EMPLOYEES WHEREAS, the 1987 Session of the Virginia General Assem- bly established pursuant to House Joint Resolution Number 250 a joint sub-committee to study health care coverage alternatives for school employees; and WHEREAS, the 1988 Session of the Virginia General Assem- bly continued this joint sub-committee study pursuant to House Joint Resolution Number 63; and WHEREAS, this joint sub-committee heard considerable testimony about wide disparities existing in health insurance coverages provided and employer contributions made by local school boards and the problems school employees are having with this insurance coverage; and WHEREAS, the problems of local constitutional officers and employees of local government are similar to those of school employees; and WHEREAS, the joint sub-committee decided that these issues also should be addressed. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the Board of Supervi- sors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that said Board supports the study by the joint sub-committee and urges the General Assembly to provide uniform, meaningful, cost-effective health care cover- age alternatives for school employees, local constitutional offi- cers, and employees of local government. ACTS OF ASSEMBLY 2127 1988] HOUSE JOINT RESOLUTION N0. 63 z-~ Continuing the joint subcommittee studying health care coverage alternatives for school employees. Agreed to by the House of Delegates, February 16, 1988 Agreed to by the Senate, February 25, 1988 WHEREAS, the 1987 Session of the General Assembly established, pursuant to House Joint Resolution No. 250, a joint subcommittee to study health care coverage alternatives for school employees; and WHEREAS, the joint subcommittee heard conside o~ded tand employerucontributions disparities that exist in the health insurance coverages p made by local school boards, and the problems school employees are having with their insurance coverage; and roblems were suggested and considered, yet WHEREAS, a number of solutions to the p ro riate the subcommittee feels that additional information is needed before the most app p solution can be reached; and g7HEREAS, since problems a~ret sumle art those of school empt yees, the: subcomm ttee their health insurance coverages decided that these, too, should be addressed; now, therefore, be it That the joint the Senate concurring, RESOLVED by the House of Delegates, subcommittee eso ~ ued. ~ In addition tod co idering alternatives for school employees, tithe employees be c ,~ :, joint subcommittee shall consider health care coverage alternatives for local constitu on officers and employees of local government. vacancies The membership of the joint subcommitt rovidedl m House Jointt ResolutionyNo. 250 of that occur shall be filled in the manner asp _ _. „ .. 1987. The joint subcommittee shall complete its work in time to submit its recommendations to the 1989 Session of the General Assembly. The indirect costs of this study are estimated to be $8,255: the direct costs shall not exceed $2,700. HOUSE JOINT RESOLUTION Nd. 64 Directing the Virginia State Crime Commission to study the. security needs of the Uniform Statewide Building Code. ~ :: : , ,..-- , . Agreed, to by the House of Delegates, February 16, 1988 Agreed to by the Senate, March 9, 1988 WHEREAS. crime in the Commonwealth is of great concern to all citizens: and AT THE REGULAR MEETING OF TTHEBROANOKE COUNTYIADMINISTRATIONE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT 1988 CENTER ON TUESDAY,SEPTEMBER 27, RESOLUTION 92788-9.c REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF BYERS ROADTIONOSECONDARYIROADDSYSTEMENT OF TRANSPORTA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1, That this matter came this day to be heard upon the roceedings therein and upon the application for Byers Road a p 0.15 section of road extending from Quail Place (Route 1888), miles north of Trevilian Road (Route 1413), and extending in a direction 0.16 miles to a proposed westerly and northerly "T"-turnaround, pursuant to Section 33.1-72.1, Paragraph C-1 and funded as a Rural Addition. 2, That this Board does guarantee the Commonwealth of Virginia an unrestricted right-of-way of 50 feet with necessary easements for drainage as recorded in Deed Book 792, Page 300, dated June 15, 1968, and subsequent deeds of record in the Roanoke County Circuit Court Clerk's Office. 3, That this Board does certify that this road was open to public use prior to January 1, 1976, at which time this road was open to and used by motor vehicles. 4, That this Board does certify that speculative interests are not involved. 5. That said road known as Byers Road which is shown on a certain sketch accompanying this resolution, be, and the same is hereby established as a public road to become a part of the only from state secondary system of highways in Roanoke County, and after notification of official acceptance of said road by the Virginia Department of Transportation. On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor McGraw and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, McGraw, Nickens, Robers, Garrett NAYS : None A COPY TESTE: ~fYl ~ ~, Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File ineerin Phillip Henry, Director, Eng g and Arnold Covey, Director, Development & Inspections, copy for Virginia Department of Transportation ITEM NUMBER ~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BNOKE COUNTYEADMINISTRATIONNOCENTER COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROA MEETING DATE: September 27, 1988 ers Road into the Virginia Department SUBJECT: Acceptance of BY stem under the Rural Addition of Transportation Secondary Sy Policy. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: the Board of rojects approved by leted Byers Road is one of the p Staff has comp and Supervisors under the Rurovemen tsoandoneed~for right-of-waY the review of the imP inia Department of Transportation. drainage easements with thappropriate right-of-way and drainage Based on this review, ro ear of thersubmt talato easements have bhe attacheddresolutio P as]p would include t VDOT. FISCAL IMPACT: roads will be reconstructed and improved utilizing VDOT These Secondary Rural Addition Funds. RECOMMENDATION: roved to Staff recommends that ers Road into theoSeco daryeRoad System. request VDOT to accept By SUBMITTED BY: Phillip Henry, •E• Director of Engineering APPROVED: /,~-/ ~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ----------------- VOTE ---'- - ACTION No yes Abs Approved ( ) Motion by: Garrett Denied ( ) Johnson Received ( ) McGraw Referred Nickens To Robers 2 wtD . 5 a qn QR~y"T F41R ON6 RD F DR 6~ W/I/)~ - ~ ,~ .. nQEVTDN^ v ~( ARQIN `~, i /o aoBERY~GVINT GAR ~ ,~/ `-/ ~ 1 ~. 04}4 ~~ SuW?^`" I-VN f ~ ~ pC~; BROONVIF~ ~OMDaEyJ OR GAflMMI DR ~ 2 ~ "~/ ~ PD <Ono enERDfAN JGN `a ~ Q? °q S ISQZ ~•:a ~.j/./ 'LC~~ ^V N P~ ~ N k..,~ s~ E.F~f.Q~, .r ~~14-MP -_.--c ° CCq.wO 0 ~_______ ______l..% .__ ._ -~-- G S).-...-.---__ - - ~' NOaTHH~M P% __- o .~..-..-... ` C 4, - ._-. _`~~so, °q b~ $UMMERDEAN '~sr ---' _ _ ry},S ~c9 0 Q ~ Q ~/, yN - - 'F- 9 f~~ i MEAOEWOOU ~.p,~ ~go~'SUNµYBR00K ~9jj0~y o~. ¢PSro wtx°. $UMMERLEN ox ~? D -- ~,r~~ ~~ Q. z '.ETON ',op ~E~A~ ~3 pys. ~`~E"iu.~SRO g ~ - - - - t o,' F . {GgRTH}iILLS ¢°GARpEir.~'P~ 1 -. - 1 ~d~l ~' ~ °v S`,,. v9 C~~N pJ.- II5 ~BEA MONJ ~Oi ~~p0.V PE~V - PJ -- 4 • sz~ NORTH PtARrA ~: ~g Eo~Y~~~SV,,:,~~~~VICINITY MAP ). " ---- l ~~ CIVBHDUSE ., ~ Y4...-~'-.. ~ -- PROPOSED ADDITION SHOWN IN YELLOW DESCRIPTION: oint on 1) Byers Road from a p Quail Place (Route 1888) to proposed "T"-turnaround. LENGTH: RIGHT OF WAY: :ROADWAY WIDTH: SURFACE WIDTH: SERVICE: IMPROVEMENT NEC (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) ESSA RESIDENT ENGINEERS RECOMMENDATION: 0.16 Miles 50 Feet 20-30 Feet 18-25 Feet 6 Homes RY: ,~'~ T THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOApR,NOKE COUNTYIADMINOISTRATIONE A HELD AT THE RO COUNTY, VIRGINIA, SEPTEMBER 27, 1988 CENTER ON TUESDAY, RESOLUTION REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF BYERS ROAD INTOSECONDARYIROADDSYSTEMENT OF TRANSPORTATION BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: to be heard upon the 1, That this matter came this day lication for Byers Road a s therein and upon the app proceeding 0,15 section of road extending from Quail Place (Route 1888), and extending in a miles north of Trevilian Road (Route 1413). osed westerly and northerly direction 0.16 miles to a prop ~~ ~~- rnaround, pursuant to Section 33.1-72.1. Paragraph C-1 and T to funded as a Rural Addition. 2. That this Board does guarantee the Commonwealth of Vir inia an unrestricted right-of-way of 50 feet with necessary g Page 300, easements for drainage as .recorded in Deed Book 792' the dated June 15, 1968, and subsequent deeds of record in Roanoke County Circuit Court Clerk's Office. en to 3, That this Board does certify that this road was op blic use prior to January 1, 1976, at which time this road was pu open to and used by motor vehicles. 4, That this Board does certify that speculative interests are not involved. 4 ~~ 5. That said road known as Byers Road which is shown on a certain sketch accompanying this resolution, be, and the same is hereby established as a public road to become a part of the state secondary system of highways in Roanoke County, only from and after notification of official acceptance of said road by the Virginia Department of Transportation. 5 92788-9.d ACTION N0. _ ITEM NUMBER REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OUNTY UADMINISOTRATOIONROC~oER AT A COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE MEETING DATE: September 27, 1988 AGENDA ITEM: Request for approval of Cave Spring High School PTSA. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: Raffle Permit for the SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: h School PTSA has applied for a Raffle Permit The Cave Spring Hig They have paid the $25.00 fee. to be held on October 31, 1988. a lication has been reviewed by R. Wayne Compton, roval. The PP Commissioner of the Revenue and he recommends aP ~~ ~ ~ ~~ Mary H.Al1en k Elmer C. H d County Administrator Deputy Cler --- ---------------- VOTE --------------------ACTION -- Yes No Abs Approved (X) Motion by: Garrett _~ Denied ( ) Johnson ,~.~ Received ( ) McGraw ~.- Referred Nickens x cc: File Bingo/Raffle File ~~ OE ~pANp~ F a ,~ O~ ~yOANp~~L ~ ti , •' A 2 Z ~? VIRGINIA a~ 2 COUNTY OF ROANOKE, t83a d ~a3a COMMISSIONER OF THE REVENUE AppLICATION FOR PERMIT TO CONDUCT\RAFFLES OR BINGO ame or raffle permit. Application is hereby made for a bingo g and State laws- This application is made subiations now inuforce, or that may be rules, and reg a reed to by the under- ordinances, enacted hereafter and which are here y 9 d a plicant and which shall be deemed a condition under signe P which this permit is issued. 1 a plicants should exercise llowingc qre to ensure the accue uestions. Bingo games Al p cy of their responses to tregulated by Title 18.2-340.1 et. inia Code, and by Section and raffles are strictly These laws authorize of the criminal statutes of the VirgCode. 4-86 et. se of the Roanoke County nt Board of Supervisors to condfflea ermitnabThe1Boardlhas the Cou Y ranting a bingo or ra P tion prior to g of an application to grant or deny the sixty days from the filing or revoke the permit of any The Board may deny, suspend, liance with county and permit. organization found not to be in strict com state law. these or state regulations concerning Any person violating county erson who ermits shall be guilty of a Class 1 misdemeanor. Any p p an part of the gross receipts from bingo or rafflcommunityy uses Y ious, charitable, ecifi- purpose other tha ur oseswfor which the organization is sp shall or educational p P erating expenses, cally organized, except for reasonable op be guilty of a Class 6 felony. THIS APPLICATION IS FOR: (check one) BINGO GAMES RAFFLE PERMIT ~ Name of Organization c S ~ ~ Street Address 3 1 C1~ aaa ~ R Mailing Address Q City, State, Zip Code k v ~~ wA O { C~~ aRe Purpose and Type of Organization o I ~~.... - ~ ufl~ anization founded? ~''~'f ~(~1C'V~ When was the org S'`f .~-_ ~._=_=- Roanoke County meeting place?Cp~~ ~c~.hc,u`a~n Sc1~oJ~ Has organization been in exiNtOence in Roanoke County for two con- tinuous years? YES~_ ---- rofit? YES ~ _ NO Is the organization non-p Indicate Federal Identification Number # ~" ~ (icy Ir,~ ~ - Attach copy of IRS Tax Exemption letter. Officers of the Organiz'1awt`ion: President: ~~a+-~~~ ~~`"°~ 5i"` -N ~ ~ r~. Address : ,7 q 3 1 Gas '~~ ~~ U~ a~-~~x Secretary: ~ ~ ~l a 1 ise Address: .7 ~`~ -~~ ~~ Uz ~`~~~~ Vice-President ~'~ ~~ ~~ ~ I 1 .S ~ Address: ~a~~ l.~uw a V• U 7 O 1 ~( ~~ ~~~ Treasurer: ~avi o -_--- Address: ~ 30 ~ 1 a" ~ I ~~ r~ ~~ of Y ~ ~~ Member authorized to be responsible for Raffle or Bingo opera- tions: Specific location where Raffle or Bingo Game is to be co -- Crwe S pay ng1"{~9h Sehoo) Phone~~~-103-Bus. Phone ~k`i-~~~3 COMPLETE LIST OF THE NAMES AND LIGATION SS O ra~1~oF-tolE s~ MEMBER- A SHIP MUST BE FURNISHED WITH THIS A nductPd. ~ _ ~ _ ~ ~ r- Name ~r ~- a. ~ ~ °~~ ~"' ~ ~n~a ~Y- Home Address 3 ~ ~ 1 ~ 15 k Sr 1'Y) Date of Drawing Time of Drawing~._ RAFFLES: BINGO• Days of Week & Hours of Activity: Sunday ---Monday --Tuesday ~-Wednesday ~-Thursday ---Friday ---Saturday _ _____ ~- From_ _ To~_ From~ _ To~_ From _ To__ ~ From _ To_______ From _ To~_ From To--- From To___ 2 I "`f State specifically how the proceeds used. List in detail the use of the the proceeds. Use elstimated amounts '~Iea.SQgaeA~pa~1¢e~ ~-1$r from the Bingo/Raffle will be planned or intended use of if necessary. ~~ BINGO• Complete the following: Legal owner(s) of the building where BINGO is to be conducted: Name: Address: County State Zip__ Is the building owned by a 501-C non-profit organization? Seating capacity for each location: Parking spaces for each location: ALL RAFFLE AND BINGO APPLICANTS MUST ANSWER QUESTIONS 1 - 19 1, Gross receipts from all sources relgted to the °p or calenf Bingo games or Instant Bingo by calendar uarter for p dar year period. INSTANT BINGO BINGO 1st Quarter 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter 1st Quarter 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter Total Total 2, Does your organization understand that it is a violation of law to enter into a contract with any person or firm, associa- tion, organization, partnership, or corporation of any classifica- tion whatsoever, for the purpose of organizing, managing, or con- ducting Bingo Games or Raffles? y~¢ 3, Does your organization understand that it mustertaining ato file complete records of receipts and disbursements p Bingo games and Raff ~er'ofnahe Revenue? records are subject to audit by the Commissi• q. Does your organization understand that the Commissremises the Revenue or his designee has the right to go upon the p on which any organization is conducting a Bingo game or raffle, to perform unannoo be maintained fo r Bingoegames o~r rafales all re- cords required t ~c n _-~ 5, Does your organization understand that a Financial Report must be filed with th emberlof leachr calendar yearn forowh~ h ae pere the first day of No mit has been issued? ~IeS 6, Does your organization understand that if gross receipts ex- ceed fifty thousand dollars during any calendar quarter, an addi- tional Financial Report must be filed for such Quarter no later than sixty days following the last day of such quarter? yQc ~, Does your organization understand that the failure to file financial reports when due sn izat onu shall t~onduct anyoBingo game the permit, and no such orga ro erl filed and a or raffle thereafter until such report is p p Y new permit is obtained? ~~es g, Does your organization understand that each Financial Repthe must be accompanied byhatCthelfroceedsvoflany Bingoegame for r affle Board of Directors, t P reli ious, charitable, commu- have been used for these lawful, g pity, or educational puranizedfoandhthatttheooperation of Bingo cifically chartered or org games or raffles have beTitle 18.2 ofathe Code ofeVpirginia?nvTc Article 1.1 of Chapter 8, 9, Does your organization understand that a one percent audit toss receipts must be paid to the County of Roanoke fee of the g upon submission of the annual financial report due on or be ore the first of November. T_ 10. Does your organization understand that this permit is valid in the County of Roanoke and only at such locations, and for only ,e-~--- such dates, as are designated in the permit application?~ 11. Does your organization understand that no person, except a bona fide member of anlzationofornataleastwninetyldaysvpriornto member of such organ o era - such participation, shall participate in the managandnno person tion, or conduct of any bingo gaarticipating/in management, shall receive any remuneration fora e or raffle? VQ_T~___- - ooeration, or conduct of any such g 12. Has your organization attached a check for the annual permit fee in the amount of $25.00 payable to the County of Roanoke, Virginia?v eS our organization understand that any organization found 13. Does y gin o and Raffle Ordinance or §18.2- in violation of the County g 340.10 of the Code of Virginia authoriersonthshareholder, gent, to having such permit revoked and any p member or employee of such organization who violates the a agen t ermit revoked and any person, shareholder, having such p member or employee of such organization who violates the a ove referenced Codes may be guilty of a felony. -- , .~- 5 =-y 14. Has your organization attached a complete list of its member- ship to this application form? \1ec - 15. Has your organization attached a co of its bylaws to this application form? •Dc 16. Has the organization been declared tion under the Virginia Constitution or If yes, state whether exemption is for or both and identify11exempt property. w ~oii.~ ~~ ~~' SC~oel1 ~ li,~c~ ~~S Lp~C pY exempt from property taxa- statutes? eip~ _ real, personal property, o<«a ~ ~` ~ a.o 17. State the specific type and purpose of the organization. },~ ., o \~ a+Q ~ o Sr C ~ : ~~- 4e r ~L V v ta~~__1.~ ~.,.,.._ cea~~e4 OuaooSe ~o Aad~ lg, Is this organization incorporated in Virginia? ~~~1~ If yes, name and address of Registered Agent: 19, Is the organization registered wucsuantVtogtheaCharit ble of Agriculture and Consumer Affairs p Solicitations Act, Section 57-48 of the Virginia Code? (If so, attach copy of registration.) Has the organization been fraAntr d ulturemand Consumerg Affairs? by the Virginia Department o g tion.) ~ (If so, attach copy of exemp ALL RAFFLE APPLICANT AND PROCEED TO NOTARIZAT ONTO BE RAFFLED, VALUE OF SUCH ARTICLES, Fair Market Value Article Description ~-e.as~ see A}?pchrd t,is~ 6 -~-y ALL BINGO APPLICANTS MUST ANSWER QUESTIONS 20 - 27 BEFORE NOTARIZATION RAFFLE APPLICANTS, GO TO NOTARIZATION. 20, Does your organizf~e°uentdly sthaa two cahlendarod ys inhany not be conducted more q calendar week? 21. Does your organization understand that it is required to keep complete records of the bingo game. These records based on §18.2- 340.6 of the Code of Virginia and §4.98 of Roanoke County Code must include the following: a, A record of the date, quantity, and card value of instant bingo supplies purchased, as well as the naliesndanddwritten the supplier of such instant bingo supp urchase of in- invoice or receipt is also required for each p stant bingo supplies? b. A record in writing of the dates on which Bingo is played, eo le in attendance on each date, and the the number of p P rizes on each day? amount of receipts and p (These records must be retained for three years.) c, A record of the na~eo~ns ecd 1 sBingoa game dprizeaor jackpot door prize, regula P from the playing of Bingo is awarded? d, A complete and itemized record oeeawith c thesquarter yrand ments which support, and that ag annual reports required to be filed, and that these records must be maintained in reasonable order to permit audit?__ our organization understand that instant Bingo may only 22. Does y ro ress, be conducted at such time as regular Bingo game is in p g and only at such locations and at such times as are specified in this application? 23, Does your organization understand that the gross receipts in ear from the playing of instant Bingo the course of a reporting y may not exceed 33 1/3$ of the gross receipts of an organization's Bingo operation? 24. Does your organizatiinbelowrsixteentyearsnof age? an instant Bingo card to an individua 25, Does your organization understand that an organization whose gross receipts from all bingo operations thaea~xshaalohaveebeen pected to exceed S75,000 in any calendar y granted tax-exempt status pursuant to Section SO 1-C of the United States Internal Revenue Service? (Certificate must be attached.) 7 s-y 26. Does your organization understand that a Certificate of Occu- pancy must be obtained or be on file which authorizes this use at the proposed location? 27. Does your organization understand that awards or prize money or merchandise valued in excess of the following amounts are illegal? a, No door prize shall exceed twenty-five dollars. b, No regular Bingo or special Bingo game shall exceed One Hund- red dollars. c, No jackpot of any nature whatsoever shall exceed One Thousand Dollars, nor shall tha texceedmOnetThousandpDollarseS awarded in any one calendar d y * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * NOTARIZATION: THE AppLIOCANTS OATH MUST BE TAKEN BY ALL I hereby swear or affirm under the penalties of perjury as set forth in §18.2 of the Code of Virginia, that all of the above statements are true to the best of my knowledge, information, and beliefs. All questions have been answered. Signed by: ~ ~ ~_ Title Home Ad ress Name "~~ ~~s~~~19 ~ ~' Subscribed and sworn before me, this ~ ~ day of~-~ My commission expires: U ~ \~ 19 g\ ~. Notar Public PLEASE RETURN THIS COMPLETED APPLICATION T0: R. [Jayne Compton, Commissioner of the Revenue P. 0. Box 20409 Roanoke, VA 24018-0513 8 NOT VALID UNLESS COUNTERSIGNED having been found in due form, is approved The above application, and issued to the applicant to have effect until December 31st of this calendar year. /, U ~ ~ •~„~ / ommissi ner of the enue Date The above application is not approved. Commissioner of the Revenue Date 9 • C A V E S P R I N G H I G H S C H O O L P I S A '~ ~ G IAN T R A F F L E Prizes to be awarded on November 19, 1987, at Cave Spring High School at approximately 9:00 p.m. You do not have to be present to win. Prizes are listed in the order that they will be awarded. . MI~UBISHI ~$~800 Color Full Square ~" Stereo ~ ;. ~.~; .; < ..,.:;s 3 speakers, 3-D Sound, Cable compatable, wireless remote control ESTIMATED .PRIZES VALUE CONTRIBUTOR Set of 3 precision tools $250 Control Distributors, Inc., Hugh Key Bar Stool 219 Stephenson & Aldridge Desk Chair ~ 150 Harris Office Furniture "Studies Skill Course" 150 Janus Learning Center (February 16, 1.988 for 6 weeks) Portable Humidifier 130 Southern Refrigerator Corp. Wine Table i05 Kweller's Ethan Allen Gallery Emerson Black & White T.V.,AM-FM 100 Circuit City Electronic Digital Clock Radio Oriental A.!~ea Rug 70 Fashion Floors Mono-print-Art Work 75 Mary Jane Robers 11 x 14 Framed Watercolor 75 Martha Rhodes 50 Gallons - Gasoline 62 Spencer's Cave Spring Exxon 12" Black ~ White Television 60 R-Mart Franklin Road G8 Space Saver Kitchen Radio 60 Lowe's - Route 460 Amrhein Jewelers-Tanglewood Square 52 Silver Chain Gift Certificate 50 Valley Shoes Gift Certificate - 8 x 10 Color Photo 50 Gentry Studio Gift Certificate - 8 x 10 Color Photo 50 Gentry Studio Gift Certificate for a Class Rinq 50 Jenkins Ring Co. - Bill Edmunds, Rep. Gift Certificate 50 The Kroger Co. ,42"~Fanco Ceiling Fan ~ 49 ~ Anonymous Two Dozen Golf Balls ~ 48 Norfolk/Southern Corp. Two Kirk Steiff Silver Plated Goblets 40 Leggetts at Tanglewood Decorative Serving Tray 37 Wiley Seymour House Cheese Tray for 20 people 35 Martha's Vineyard Wicker Picnic Chair 34 Orvis, Inc. Stationery Supplies 35 Word's Hallmark Shop Stationery Supplies 35 Word's Hallmark Shop Woman's Fashion 30 Fashions by Martha Four Dinners 30 Golden Coral Five Car Washes 30 Tanglewood Car Wash Gift Certificate 30 Roy L. Webber Florist, Inc. Patterned Pie Plate 30 Finks at Tanglewood Oil, Filter, Lube-Certificate 25 Oak Grove Texaco Reader's Digest Merry Christmas 25 The Bandroom Song Book Grease and Oil Certificate 25 Brambleton Auto Set of 12 Norfolk Southern 20 Norfolk Southern Corp. Drinking Glasses One Cheesecake 20 JaMar Haircut, Shampoo, Blow dry 20 Hair Associates Haircut, Shampoo, Blow dry 20 Hair Associates Haircut, Shampoo, Blow dry 20 Hair Associates Gift Certificate 20 Athlete's Foot 16 x 60~mirror 20 Weaver Mirror Co. CAVE SPRING HIGH SCHOOL P.T.S.A. 1988-89 ~, P.T.S.A. Goals -- To Raise Funds for: (1) Educational Materials (2) ~ Student Scholarships * Matching Funds--Roanoke County * Program for School Equipment * Task Force to the Opposition of Drinking and Driving # Academic Honors Program * Oddessey of the Mind (OM) * Presidential Academic Fitness Pins ~ Acrylic for Picture Frames P.T.S.A. Meetings for 1988-89 Boa_eting September 'sleds . , Sept. 21 -7 P •M October Weds., Oct. 19 -7 P.M. February Weds., Feb. 22 -7 P.M. i~f~ of Weds., May 17 -7 P.M. May P . T . S~etin Tues., Sept. 27 - 7 P.M. Tues., Oct. 25 - 7 P.M. Tues., 28 - Feb. 7 P.M. 11 ~-'i l ~~ 7 p -1111 . ., R ..,,~-~-- ---r- Tues., May 23 - ? P.M. .~~ ~~ ffiGH 9Q•~ P.T.S.A. 1988-89 pf f fivers aTd ~tt~ ~avcpersonS 989-0552 (H) Bambara Michelsen 989-0863 (~) President 5931 Castle Rock Rd. Virginia 24018 Roanoke, 774-4938 Carol Tull Co-First Vice Presidents 5240 Iuwa~ prive SH1 24018 Roanoke, Virginia 989-6694 Rachel ~ine ll Avenue 3618 Mart Roanoke, Virginia 24018. 989-5175 kips Eddie & Vicki Hop Vice Presidents ~-Second 6776 Circle Creek 24065 Boones Mill, Virginia 362-4656 Bob Lipscccnb Third Vice President 7035 Irondale Circle 24019 Roanoke, Virginia 774-9305 Mickey KageY Recording Secretary 4932 Balsam Road 24018 Roanoke, Virginia 774-8712 Linda Fisher Corresponding Secretary 5642 Wazti~ Drive 24018 Roanoke, Virginia 989_9549 Marion Kunkle Treasurer 3306 Dawn Circle Roanoke, Virginia 774-1984 rwood Carol Uryde County Council Representative 3659 Bond Stx'~t 24018 Roanoke, Virginia '" ~ ~ ret `~urtis 774-7199 MAY Marg filth & Safety 2631 South~~s ~Drive• 24018 Roanoke, Virginia 989-8667 Kay Allen Legislation 3520 Canter Circle 24018 Roanoke, Virgi~a 772-0775 Pat Bollinger prive Cultural Arts 3808 Kentlandinia 24018 Virg Roanoke, Scholarship Catmittee Linda Shiner-~hairnian 774-3953 4965 Topping Hill Drive Roanoke, Virginia 24018 Loretta Walton 989-8662 4733 Walton Lane ~, Roanoke, Virginia 24018 Betty Blalock 774-5184 5531 Lynn Dell Road Roanoke, Virginia 24018 Sheila Barnhart 774-8829 5420 Linda Lane Roanoke, Virginia 24018 Joan Farley 772-7568 6510 Woodbrook Drive Roanoke, Virginia 24018 r~.ind Raising Pat Colson-Martin 989-1033 5630 Warvaood Drive Roanoke, Virginia 24018 Publicity ~ Linda Lang 774-3066 5932 Big Horn Drive Roanoke, Virginia 24018 Hospitality Carol Pruner-C~~airman 989-4401 5385 Luwana Drive Roanoke, Virginia 24018 Caen Hauser 989-6383 5318 Black Bear Lane Roanoke, Virginia 24018 Mary Burnley 989-6626 3730 Buckingham Drive Roanoke, Virginia 24018 Sandra Hawes 989-8408 4122 White Dove Lane Roanoke, Virginia 24018 CM PTA Representative C~arlsie Pafford 989-5888 3621 Bond Street Roanoke, Virginia 24018 Parliamentarian Nancy Verity 989-0922 6026 Saddleridge Road Roanoke, Virginia 24018 PTA MEMBERSHIP LIST 1987-1988 Robert & Pamela Glover 3051 Glenmont Drive Earle & Meredith Spruill 5443 Chatsworth Dr. 774-8129 Bill & CarolLaned1774-7386 3635 Janney Carol Via Lineberry 5402 Cieser Rd. 989-8728 Dan Owen' Po Box 4664 982-2992 John Eades 4306 Fontaine Dr. 774-2268 Sonja Duffey 2719 Tanglewood 989-6067 Mr. & Mrs. Ron Skopitz 6003 Saddleridge Rd. 989-9431 Roy & Leslie Willett 4938 Hunting Hills Circle 774-5177 Fa-Hwa & Rosa Cheng 3924 St. James Circle 774-2399 Carl & Louise Beamer 5453 Clearbrook Lane 774-6441 Wayne & Beverly Hale 5817 Saddleridge Rd. 774-7926 Joseph & Alice Nar989e5106 5824 Penguin Or. Lewis & Glenda C~chs774_6499 4682 Kettering Lloyd & Karen Beckett 3516 Lakeland Dr.~ 989-0190 Sylvia & Ralph $989h7933 7080 Crown Rd. Betty Marr 2121 Bridle Lane 774-7657 Brian &~ Sharon Swarp~,•.r,., ggA:~$486 6118 Hi ddenr ilal ley 'Allen &kelanddD~nd~774-2993r. 5327 La • Bob & Susan McDona~d 77~V~~7~ 5~~1 (^yncchnw ('i r~ Richard & Jeanne Bourne 7130 Pine Needle Dr. 774-4976 David &Beverly Reger 6012 Woodcock Circle 989-0023 Bill & Maggie Crosie774-3255 3128 Clearview Dr. Mr. & Mrs. William Lange 5201 Cave Spring Lane 989-5382 Katherine D. Schear 3412 Canter Circle 774-7799 Mr. & Mrs. Jon Mane774-2729 5919 Flamingo Dr., Gene & Callie Bowles 4925 Grape Tree Lane 989-9651 Edmund & Susan Ha774-2030 5213 Archer Dr. Sara & Vernon Allen 2002 Turnstile Dr. 772-7550 Carroll & Mary Gentry 6326 Christie Lane 774-7165 Mr. & Mrs. W. P. Briskey 3326 Dawn Circle 989-5735 Henry & Elizabeth Wise 7594 Countrywood Dr. 989-0673 Gerald & Diane Wingo 4517 Hammond Lane 989-6595 John & Gaye Jones 2629 Northcross Rd. 774-9141 Bruce & Gwen Hauser 5318 Black Bear Lane '989-6383 •Mr. & Mrs•eDham Dra~989-4789 4693 Chipp Clarence uinnDriverr989-0177 5744 Peng Larry & Andi Hodges 3409 Kenwick Trail 989-4700 David & GerriD~alt774_0627 6995 Parkway ~•~ Scott &~ Cheryl ;~uesi~nbe'~y~ Claudia & Jim Brach 774-8706 7188 Hollyberry Rd. Janet & Bill Har Circle 774-9502 2616 Blue Heron .Teresa & Jim Garlow774-6562 ,942 gig Horn Dr. Dr. & Mrs. David Armstrong 3360 Dawn Circle 98g-0294 Helen & Henry Paxton 3882 Meadowlark Rd. 774-7888 Sall y & Bi 1~1. Rodgers 774-8770 4809 Brookwood Dr. Kay & Harry Hatter 774-7286 3047 Sedgef1eld Rd. Elaine & Dan Semones K-50 772-1964 3464 Colonial Ave., Spt. Karen & John Mitche198g-9504 2743 White Pelican Kendra & Larry Rasche 2426 Charing Cross 774-8763 Mary & Dana Schauer 3360 Lakeland Dr. 989-7853 Linda & David Morris 989-9893 3420 Farmington Circle Jean & David Stout 774_5583 3525 Colonial Ave. Bunny Hancock 774_5029 4878 Deerfield Dr. Peggy & Bud Davenport774-9774 4787 Chippenham Dr. Marie & William Ziegle774-2378 6163 Cotton Hill Rd. Jean & Clark Vanger9rift 3226 Bromley Rd• 774-4814 Marilyn & Ed. Rigby 774-2879 3409 Londonderry Lane Ronda & Rod Rowan 989_5752 4111 Meadow Creek Dr. arol & Dana Underwood 774-1984 C Gladys & Bob Morri s ., ~.,, ~~,,i ~. , . ~_ Linda & Bob Fisher774-8712 5642 Warwood Dr. Rena W• Brown 4432 Cresthill Dr. Dr. & Mrs. Lindsay Hickam 3779 Kenwick Trail Jack & Stella Lindsey 774-3876 3573 Martin Creek Rd. Polly McFarlane 774_0572 1923 Brookfield Dr. Dave & Rita Higginbotham 9947 Tinsley Lane 774-2866 pr• & Mrs. Howar774a~759on 6578 Woodbrook Gladys P• Munsey 774_4329 8501 Bent Mt. Rd. Nancy C• Robertson98g-g014 3409 Cordell Dr. Carolyn & Lewi~inglRdn 774_2357 5384 Willow SP Richard & Joyce Viar 3781 Verona Trail 774-4232 Stan Knnnhpell Rd. 989-4494 5516 LY Craig & Ora May Sluss 2203 Pommel Dr. 774-8735 Connie Hausman 774_6419 6070 Oriole Lane Joanne & Sandy Barbour 774-4558 Pam & Jim Hunter 774-8713 5112 Red Stag Rd. Sandra & Jon Manett774'2729 5919 Flamingo Dr. Glen W• Neighbors 989-7591 4660 12 o'clock Knob George & Patricia 989 2742 5116 Lynnson Dr. Pat &Club Laneen989~3933 5754. . Lat~hea Baene6ent Mt• 929-4612 PO Box 182, Carina C• Newell #12F 989-4230 5260 Crossbow Cir. Pat & Elmer Walters 8981 Willett La24059 929-4544 Bent Mt., Va. Cheryl Dresnok 774_1111 5295 Flintlock Rd. Jane & Al Bender 989-9643 3314 Dawn Circle Joan & Tom NaCross Dr. 774-7424 2440 Charing Sylvia & Roy Martin 5263 Fordw~ck Dr. 989-8272 Rebecca & Jon Quilan 10550 Sling Gap 929_4331 Bent Mt., Va. Hildy &, George Getz 5396 Blackbear Lane 989-0376 David & CharleeeSgree~74-8137 3412 Stoneheng Susan & Larry Goodman 4058 Snowgoose Dr. 774-2941 Karen & Frank Wilkins 989-9175 4216 Whitehall Circle Dale & Bobby Waters 3719 Verona Trail 774-8675 Sharon & Mike Stevens 6620 Wellington Rd. Pat & Bill Howard 989_9399 3506 Canter Circle Joseph J. Masters 5723 Arctirus Dr. 774-2201 Judy & Ray Bush 4511 Wyndale Ave. 774-7097 Robyn Arthur 982_8696 1869 Blenhun Rd. Peg9Y & StuarHiM~ShDr. 774-5999 4842 Hunting Debora & George Swecker 1812 25 Macue St., Salem 389- Judith & Wayne Dic244s2344 2341 Carlton Rd. Gregory & Kristi Fry 5537 Ambassador Dr. Mr. & Mrs. Michael Bea9h89-9470 3611 Meadowl.oark Rd., Betty & Doug Heptinstall 4520 Hammond Lane 989-9847 Bety & Ken Brig9Y 774_9506 3824 Hyde Park Dr. Russell & Brenda Akers 5117 Sorrel Lane 989-0650 Bob & Charlsie Pafford 3621 Bond 989-5888 Doris & Curtis Patt774-7302 3910 Kentland Dr. Joyce & Paul Greenw774-6021 3905 Gallatin St. Carol & Bob Pruner 5385 Luwanna Lane 989-4401 Judy & David Brew774-5795 3539 Poplar Dr. Mary & Timothy Malloy 1864 Pelham Dr. 774-8938 Connie & Richard Mab989-4095 3671 Chaparral Dr. Dottie & Ron Beck 3044 Lofton Rd. Mr. & Mrs. W. J. Baird 2833 Purple Finch Bonnie & Tom Rhodes 5233 Luwanna Dr. Patricia Manning 3604 Cedar Lane 774-2390 Alan McClellan Lane 989_4152 3541 Londonderry Pat & Al Marraccini 989_0007 6477 Poages Mi11 Dr. Mary & Dave Burtis 774_7199 2631 Southwoods Dr. F;l~~n R PPtPr Ku~cki David & Gail Price Clay & Lucy Partin 774_4198 6642 Shingle Ridge Rd. Tom & Elaine Boyd a Rd. 10427 Fortune R24059 929-4400 Bent Mt., Va. John & Helgard Leg989-7539 5647 Penguin Dr. Tom & Jean Blankenship 4021 White Dove Lane 989-4864 Joann & Roger Boucher 2633 Wood Warbler Lane 989-9607 Dwight & Betty Blaylock 5531 Lynn Dell Rd. 774-5184 Pat & Bob Stratton 989-6090 5127 Remin~ton~Rd. Jimmie & Nadine Minn774-9122 3315 Kingswood Dr. John & Linda MorgaRd• 989-4806 5249 Falcon Ridge Joel & Emily Pack 5661 Country Lane Bill & Punky Miller 4014 Belle Meade Dr. 989-6339 Barbara & Vince Brand774r1021 3466 Meadowlark Rd. Roger & Carol Farley 5211 Hawkbill Circle 774-1828 Fred &Veronica JasPe989_5450 4711 Glenbrook Dr. Maxine & Richard Sprague 5400 Bernard Dr. 989-5094 Joseph & Kathleen Gelmini 989-4492 Roger & Sharon Vest 774_8672 7892 Five Oaks Rd. Roger & Caro~ingu~grcleer774-9240 4903 Cave Sp Howard & Norma Atkins 7909 Starlight Lan~4065 774-4733 Boones Mill, Va. Jan Dowling 3126 Garst Cabin Dr. 774-9301 Irma Bono 4384 Blackbear Lane 989-0031 Shelley Thomason 989-9443 3938 Vauxhall Rd. Larry Wheeling 989_3083 4910 Cartwr'~ght Dr. Anne & Max Landey 989-7023 Sandra & George Hawes 4122 White Dove Lane 989-8408 Annette Little 4226 Arlington Hills 989-0449 NanEy Thomas 4271 Falcon Ridge Rd., Jim & Barbara Michelson 4921 Castle Rock Rd. 989-0552 Betty Spraker 3375 Kelly Lane 774-2890 Gene & Callie Bowles 4925 Grape Tree Lane 989-9651 Dr. & Mrs. Thomas Ph989~8739 4024 Chaparral Dr. Linda & Larry Fogarty 5327 Silver Fox 772-0193 Jacqueline & Alton774a~811y 5705 Penguin Dr. Janet F• Lfneld Dr. 774-8678 3338 Holly Ann & William Rutherford Bonita M. Kelley 2524 Churchill Dr. Marth & Bill Clark 989-0698 4934 Buckhorn Rd. Loretta H. Phillips 3348 Dawn Circle 989-3428 Bonnie & Richard Evans 4443 Cordell Dr. 774-1905 Katherine & ponni989r4116 3719 Tgnl ey Norma D. Moore 4366 Kirkwood Dr. 774-2977 Phil & Linda Shiner Johnny & Robin Maxey989_7657 5428 Winterset Dr. Branan & Gay Thompson 3438 Greencliff Rd. 774"7877 Jerry & Linda Ande989n3429 3480 Pilot Blvd. '.Edward & LindaDCord772_0453 6781 Parkway Pauline & Melvin Joh774n6318 6511 Woodbrook Dr. Barbara & StDavideCtrge989'0079 4200 E. St.' Andrew & Gayle Cohen 989_5353 6880 Cox Hopkins Rd. Gail Trussell 989_1435 6054 Burnham Rd. David & Debbie Tan98g_g122 3546 Grandin Rd. John & Carol Parker 774_8357 6133 Hidden Valley Dr. Jack & KarooserCircle 774-2986 4043 Snowg Frank & Carol Bush 989_3479 5431 Winterset Dr. Frank & Nancy Robbin 5444 Linda Lane 774'8381 Gerry & Rose Bingeman 6521 Sugar Ridge 989-3169 Deborah & Gene Lynn 6325 Hidden Hill Circle 774-4888 Linda & Gene McGuir989-9696 6532 Tallwood Dr. Linda & Phillip Whitaker 3948 Bower Rd. 989-8314 Linda Ratliff 989_5980 6636 Old Farm Rd. Elizab~ee lechaseeD rav989-8448 6064 S P LoretWaltonaLane a989n8662 4233 Joan & Don Baker. 989,6127 4415 Rosecrest Rd. Dick & Lane Neng Circle 774-0736 5025 Cave Sp Linda Burns 889_6406 5252 Fordwick Dr. Bernard & Betty Young 6205 Hidden Valley Dr. 774-9150 Pam Fisher 989_4784 4986 Hunting Hills Circle Donald L. Hooker 5991 Chaucers Ct. 774-3946 Jerry Ditch 989_3200 7655 Apple Grove Lane Mr. & Mrs. Dale Sheets989_7800 2656 Willowlawn St. Tom & Kathy Buback 3916 Gallatia St. 989-5339 Haven & Nancy Shuck 5405 Ganter Dr. 774-7547 James & Suellen 77481514 5423 Wynne Rd. Jean & Barry Hensley 5934 Flamingo Dr. 774-6728 David &landlGamerRd. 774'4805 5037 ~p Nancy & Austin eeRdty 989_0922 6026 Saddleridg Mr. & Mrs. John SPe~j4e3449 6668 Suncrest Dr. Mr. & Mrs. Eddie Hearp 774_4333 6245 Hidden Valley Dr. Barbara Trollinaer 989rg842 5849 Saddleridg LioieLi ttDlehorneDr11l 774-6050 571 Daya Shelby 989_0709 5210 Luwana Dr. Jamie Law 989_5595 „~n~ Rnh White Dr. Bonnie & Richard Crabbs '2682 Southwoods 774-2928 Michael & Patricia Sisk 5253 Crossbow Circle 989-5162 Jim & B. J. Crook 5726 Scenic Hills Dr. 774-8241 Dale & Marjorie Walker 2716 Bobwhite Dr. 989-1570 Mr. & Mrs. Scalin 3686 Bower Rd. 989-0497 Donald & Suzanne Krueger 3537 Chaparral'Dr. Mr. & Mrs. R. D. Kidwell 5459 Linda Lane 774-9198 Mr. & Mrs. C. P. Stepnenson 5018 Upland Game Rd. 774-2581 Don & Helen Edmunds 3817 Kentland Dr. 774-8488 John & Linda Tuffy 5227 Archer Dr. 989-7874 James & Rose Cantrell 5595 W. Briar Ct. 774-7350 Jorge & Daniza Suarez 4978 Hunting Hills Circle 989-1983 Andy & Ardell Stone 2626 Wood Warbler 774-4373 Donna & Vincent Vecen 1802 Bridle Lane 989-8813 Don & Ruth Hutchinson 6042 Flamingo Dr. Mary Board 4321 Cordell Dr. 989-5008 Mr. & Mrs: F. D. Shockley 6112 Burnham Rd. 774-4542 Dan & Mary Yasenchak 1229 Longview Rd. 989-3587 James & Joann Durham 4539 Vest Dr. 772-3905 Pat & Shirley Theimer 6620 Shingle Ridge Rd. 774-6241 Dale & Cecelia Hanslik 1910 Brookfield Dr. 774-3918 Charles & Carol Tull 5240 Luwana Dr. 774-4938 Kenny & Fay Gibson 7087 Pinevill-~Dr. 774-7663 Josephine Greer 4801 Easthill Or. 774-7189 Walker & Mary Hartman 2415 Charing Cross Dr. 989-8705 Nancy Mowry 6650 Sugar Ridge Dr. 989-1120 Russ & Maureen Anderson 4115 Snowbird Circle 774-6357 Robert & Janice Dinnerville 3938 St. James Circle 774-4864 Elmer & Sue Hodge 3662 Verona Trail 772-3244 Jean & Ray Martin 4223 Hillbrook Circle 774-1503 Mitch & Jan Rothschild 6633 Old Barn Circle 989-4931 Nancy Winebolt 4929 Hunting Hills Dr. 989-7978 Branan & Gay Thompson 3438 Greenclift Rd. 774-7977 Kay & George Bristol 5061 Fox Ridge Rd. 774-6072 Barbara Huff 6452 Back Creek Rd. 989-3546 Tousa Griffith PO Box 7, Fincastle 473-2923 Ed & Louise Kieltz 6158 Burnham Rd. 774-7422 Ronald & BarbH~llWDrlia774-8048 4748 Hickory Pat McFarland 3911 Kentland Dr. 774-1510 Joyce & Tom Noell 3260 Longhorn 774-2470 • 'Gene ~& Myrna Ware 7429 Fernway Dr. 774'6625 ' James & Beverly Bendel 2711 Mallard Dr. 774-9038 Charles & Dianne Hilborn- 3834 Kentland Dr. 774-1610 Norma Moore 4366 Kirkwood Dr. 774-2977 Fuzzy & Janet Minnix 3314 Kenwick Tr. 774-4078 Kay Lanter 2227 Sorrel Lane 989-6085 Michael & Glada Lazzuri 5812 Knowles Dr. 774-8482 Nicole Goodwin Frances Humphries 3333 Melody Ave. 989-8405 Carley & Alice Carr 5669 Grandin Rd. Ext. 774-6477 Robert & Donna Sieff 3741 Hyde Park Dr. 774-3759 George & Helen Shumate 6326 Hidden Hill Circle 774-6686 Deborah & Gene Lynn 6325 Hidden Hill Circle 774-4888 Phyllis & Tom McCallie 5968 Lakemont Dr. 774-9184 Shirley Self 3013 Tree Top Lane .774-0882 Don & Brenda Griffin 3840 Kentland Dr. 774-4275 Fred & Sue Banner 2746 Bob White Dr. 774-9531 Jake & Judith Mowrey 5444 Stoneybrook Dr. 774-3826 Lloyd & Peggy Gochenour 3237 Woodland Dr. 774-8253 Everett & Vicki .Eddy 2739 Hillbrook Dr. 774-9185 Theresa & Gary Hoback 5160 Arlington Hills Dr. Dwight & Elizabeth Bogle 3715 Colcny Lane 774-2128 Randall & Kaye Beaver 2968 Penn Forest Blvd. 989-7827 Larry & Paige Scott 6235 Laurel Hill Rd. 989-3265 Mike & Joann Hefferman 5333 Fordwick Dr. 774-6118 Mr. & Mrs. A. Grinspun 5152 Partridge Dr. 989-5695 James Mater 3782 Kentland Dr. 774-2232 Debra Shinaman 3513 Lakeland Dr. 772-2973 John & Doris Doolan 3015 Glenmont Dr. 774-1786 Robert & Hazel Brown 10169 Tinsley Lane 929-4767 George & Margaret Shorter 6337 Fairway Forest Dr. 774-1420 Bill & Terry Missert 5735 Equestrian Dr. 774-7719 Barbara & Lawrence Ford 5329 Green Meadow Rd. 774-4627 Mr. & Mrs. John Gravett 3619 Janney Lane 774-5028 Eddie & Pat Baldwin 3618 Riverdale Rd. 774-1209 Jim & Gloria Chandler 3339 Dawn Circle 989-6857 Joseph & Carol Masters 774-2201 Jerry & Rita O'Brien 772-0044 Kyle & Julie Umburger 3622 Bond St. 774-9186 Bobby & Sandra Boone 7174 Pine Needle Dr. 774-7039 Bill & Elizabeth Martin 6437 Fairway Forest Dr. 989-5790 Carson & Shirley Young 5805 Equestrian Dr. 989-4613 Larry & Judy Edwards 5220 Chukar Dr. 774-1174 Betty Bowling 774_4526 3933 Meadowlark Rd. Claire & Larry Moore 101 Snowbird Circle 774-4818 Rebecca Hale 774_4135 6469 Cotton Hill Rd. Jerry & Barbara Simmo774-9407 3418 Fleetwood Ave. John & Karen Hale 5240 Singing Hills Circle 989-8864 Walter & Sandra DeWitt 3711 Tomley Dr. Paul & Bonny Bowen 7550 Ft. Mason Dr. 989-5579 Beth & John Bi9D910 989_4147 4222 Sharoly Gary & Carole Click774-7633 4123 Snowbird Cr. Dan & Bobbie Oyler 774-9382 7028 Mt• Chestnut Rd. Tracy & Richard Krug 3719 London Circle 774-5038 Pat Canole Lane Ext. 774-2538 3386 Kelly Hank -& Russ Sterker 3337 Flintlock 774-8124 Nelina Ladia 4704 Foxhall Circle 989-0903 Duane & Janice Sweet 929_4313 1297 Bottom Creek Lane James & Janet Oyler989_g188 3806 Antietam Dr. Cary & Joanne ManLane 774-8702 5141 Cave Spring Gloria Hurleine Ave. 989-3786 3502 Brandyw L, E. Perry 3943 Hummingbird Lane 989-989 Shirley Feazelle 774_6638 5529 Cres°nt Lane Alan & Karen Shreeman 6580 Mill Run Circle 989-0262 Bob & Anne Deato~74_6712 3955 Bower Rd., Herbert ndAn~Rd.SExth 774-1789 5333 Gra Ann Douley 342-4856 1350 Craig Robertson Ave. P. L. Morgan 1808 Edmond Ave. Chris Gregory 774_9469 3806 Garst Mill Rd. Bill & Joanna Ca1d98914169 4706 Woodley Dr. Jery & Lucy Blankenship74-7824 5944 Saddleridge Rd. Mary Broadwater 774_3727 5341 Sugar Loaf Mt. Rd. Fred & Faye Guam 7063 Buckeye Rd. 989-1416 Russell & Carolyn Fra774~~395 3642 Meadowlark Rd. William George 3962 Lark Circle 774'4220 Joan & Gordon Burd 774_3339 6557 Woodbrook Dr. Harold ndalelAveBur989t3668 4512 Wy Roger & MaieeRidgelRd. 774-5912 6624 Shing John & Kay Allen 989_8667 3520 Canter Circle Bill & Becky Edmunds 4508 Rosecrest Rd. 774-4525 Ray Hartman & Christeen774-6287 6003 Indian Grave Rd. Guido & Shirley Edillon 4858 Glenbrook Dr. 989-3137 ~,nr^ia Rhymer Cecil & Mercedes Pr774a5389 7693 Bent Mt. Rd. Phil & Judy Wilcox ' 5311 Luwana Dr. 989-8179 Neil & Cathy Nicklas ~i382 Gloncester Ct. 774-6692 Roger & Linda Jefferson 5359 Doe Run Jane Coles 989_9672 4333 Electric Rd. Chuck & De11a.Willi772-2703 6120 Flamingo Dr. Wallace & Carolyn Jamison 4024 Kentland Dr. 774-9071 Tom & Maureen Woods 2615 Dove Tail Circle 989-3851 Jack & Linda Lang 5932 Big Horn Dr. 774-3066 Lawrence & Carolyn Poff 10127 Bottom Creek Rd. 929-4430 Thomas & Margaret Dew 4523 Fontaine Dr. 774-6174 TEACHERS - 1987-1988 Jewell Feld Rugh B. Hagen Martha Brooks Reba Wood Tom Bennett Ann Burch Robert Lipscomb- C. Williams Daphne Jamison Sandra Ferglen Penny Goodall Linda Johnson Tom Bennett Susanne Wiseman Sue Harris Gary Goodale Joe La Rocca Sherri Richardson Joyce Palmer Polly McFarlane Doris Boitnott Ann Thomason Kristi.Fry Judith Dickerson Mike Higgins Lynn Bryant Sue Hill Edrie Bays Camille Beck Julie Baldwin Gail Price Elaine Shafer Claudia Geiger Linda Long Debbie Swecker Jerry Little Wayne Hyatt John Oberlin Jerry Salyer Charles Hamner Mrs. R. J. Gatzke Suellen Fore Rebecca E. Ross Yvonne Harrison Ann Swann Mike Brancati Joan Farley Toni Tillman Ed Peterson Jane Haddad Robert Surat Diana Athey O~ ROANp,Y~ ti '~ A Z v a ~8~ E50 $$ SFSQUICENTENN~P A Beauti(ul8eginning COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE C~n~tnt~ of ~nttnvk~ September 29, 1988 Ms. Patricia Golson-Martin 5630 Warwood Drive Roanoke, Virginia 24018 Dear Ms. Golson-Martin BOARD OF SUPERVISORS LEE GARRETT. CHAIRMAN WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT RICHARD W. ROBERS. VICE-CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT STEVEN A. MCGRAW CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT At their regular meeting on Tuesday, September 27, 1988,the County Board of Supervisors unanimously approved the request of the Cave Spring High School PTSA for a Raffle Permit for October 31, 1988. The fee has been paid and your receipt is enclosed. You may consider this letter to be your permit, and I suggest it be displayed on the premises where the Raffle is to be conducted. The State Code provides that raffle and bingo permits be issued on a ca~e3dar1988r bThis~permitfohowever,pismonlylvalidpfor the Decembe , dates specified on your application. If I may be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me at 772-2004. Very truly yours, ~", ~/ Mary H. Allen, Roanoke County bjh Enclosure CC: Commissioner of the Revenue Commonwealth Attorney County Treasurer Deputy Clerk Board of Supervisors P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 2 4018-07 9 8 (703) 772-2004 ACTION N0. 92788-9•e ITEM NUMBER '~ ~-~/ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD _OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: September 27, 1988 AGENDA ITEM: Transfer of Roads from Va. Department of Transportation to the City of Salem COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS• SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: As a result of annexation of a portion of Roanoke County by the City of Salem the following roads became Salem City streets. a. 0.27 miles of Route 705 b. 0.16 miles of Route 1004 ~'~cu.c.~, 3~ _ Mary H. Allen Deputy Clerk Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ~ Motion by : Rnh r, _ ,Tnh71 cnn i c+o~,Pn Yes No Abs Denied ( ) A _ McGraw Garrett _~ Received ( ) Johnson ~ Referred McGraw _~ To• Nickens ,~ Robers x cc: File Phil Henry RAY D. PETHTEL COMMISSIONER a~ ~s~,~ I~ ~~~ ~ ~~vmea ~ ~V®A-Y~®1 V VV II.eL ll~d Y Y ®~ ~Y LLLL~`~.~11A ~LL6 L DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1401 EAST BROAD STREET RICHMOND, 23219 September 16, 1988 Cdr : ~~ ~' ..~ ~ ~f/ OSCAR K. MABRY DEPUTY COMMISSIONER Transfer of Secondary System Routes Within the City of Salem Due to Annexation Roanoke County Board of Supervisors County of Roanoke P. 0. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 MEMBERS OF THE BOARD: As a result of the January 1, 1988 annexation of a portion of Roanoke County by the City of Salem, the following secondary roads became city streets and no long constitute a portion of the Secondary Roads System of the county. ROUTE TERMINI LENGTH 705 From 01d NCL Salem to Route 1112 0.27 Mi. 1004 From Route 705 to an East dead end 0.16 Mi. SincereZ y, ~~e~G~~ Oscar K. Mabry Deputy Commissioner TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21ST CENTURY ACTION # 92788-10 ITEM NUMBER ~ ~~ AT A REGULAR MHELDNATOTHEHROANOKE COUNTYEADMINISTRATIONNOCENTER COUNTY, VIRGINIA MEETING DATE: September 27, 1988 AGENDA ITEM• Request for Appropriation for Design Phase of Spring Hollow Reservoir COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~~ SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: On September 13, 1988, the Board of Supervisors authorized staff to proceed with the final design phase will extendd through voir at Spring Hollow. The design p October, 1990, at a t 1751000tof the $700t000 wi110be0r0equired in been determined that $ fiscal year 1988-89. FISCAL IMPACT The $175,000 necessary to begin the final design phase could be appropriated from fund balance. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The staff recommends an appropriation of $175,000 be made from fund balance fo understandingsthatptheebalance will be funded Reservoir with the rocess. through the 1989-90 fiscal year budget p Respectfully submitted, Reta R. Busher Director of Management and Budget Approved by, ~) mow. ~....~~/~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator --------------------- ----------- -- VOTE ACTION Approved (X) Motion by: Harrv C Nickens/Steven rove after Garrett Denied ( ) A McGraw to app Johnson Received ( ) discussion McGraw Referred Nickens To Robers cc: File John Hubbard Reta Busher Diane Hyatt Cliff Craig No Yes Abs x x x X x ACTION # ITEM NUMBER ~"t ~° AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: September 27, 1988 AGENDA ITEM: Report on Recycling for Roanoke County COUNTYj~AD~MINISTRA~TtOR' S COMMENTS : ~.<ti BACKGROUND: Since 1987, Roanoke County has been recycling aluminum, glass, and paper. This pilot project which was partially funded by the Clean Valley Council requires separation of these materials into three separate containers. They are picked up weekly. Recycling has been limited to a few densely populated neighborhoods which represent approximately 3 per cent of the households in the County. The initial cost of this project was $33,000 and the annual recurring costs are approximately $7,100. This program is a one-day-a-week collection with an old truck, the cost of which is not included in the initial cost. Reports indicate that 10 to 15 per cent of the materials from these households are recycled. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Roanoke Valley Regional Solid Waste Management Board has received the draft recycling report by Olver, Inc. and will make a recommendation to the local governments by mid October. The staff is also reviewing the report and has been studying figures and formulating a comprehensive recycling plan with a goal of 25 per cent reduction in the residential waste going to the landfill. This County plan will include a phased implementation. While the pilot program works well, staff recommends several changes to improve the productivity. Collection of glass, aluminum, and paper from three separate containers will require additional vehicles and personnel. It is recommended that we modify this process to use containers and vehicles now being used by the one-armed bandit operation. Under this method, homeowners -2- would be required to septhetCountyClaAl1 otherlhousehold nrefuse which would be issued by would be placed in the mater als to bendone withstheuoneparmed collection of recyclable bandit vehicle requiring fewer personnel. ALTERNATIVES AND IMPACTS: It is estimated thatdtbe assfollowscycling using this method for the entire County wool ANNUAL - ENTIRE COUNTY (Estimates by Olver, Inc.) I. CAPITAL COSTS UNIT COST NUMBER 1. 90-gallon bins $ 62 2. Collection vehicles 98,000 3. Post-collection separation (1) a, Start-up costs (publicity, education, etc.) TOTAL CAPITAL COSTS ANNUALIZED CAPITAL II. OPERATIONAL COSTS 23,000 3 COSTS (8~ over 10 years) $ 20,000 3 1. Drivers 8,400 3 2. Vehicular costs (maintenance, fuel, etc.) 3. Replacement fund bins (5$ over 10 years) 4. Replacement fund trucks (5$ over 10 years) 5. Post-collection separation (1) 6. Publicity and education (2 mailings/yr curriculum changes) TOTAL COST $1,426,000 294,000 329,130 46,000 $2,095,100 $ 312,200 $ 60,000 28,200 129,300 26,700 148,400 46,000 $ 438,600 TOTAL ANNUAL OPERATIONAL COSTS $ 750,800 TOTAL ANNUAL COSTS The costs shown above can be phased in over impact. At r t a period of the present y a several years to lessen the budge lizes revenues from the sale of the time, the County rea nd fro a di n d l f t er a ~hat recyclable products a have not does f mat the to go to board for each ton o This makes the present program almost a break-even landfill. eration, excluding the t in Dhe o h l ic li cfuture they p a t ate nd rials purchasers of these mate them to take th roduc ts. e p may require the County to pay from the to seek markets away Therefore, it may be necessary ddit o o r a Roanoke Valley. In a dmscount a'that the ndfill bo l ecycled for a obtained from the tonnage be continued. -3- STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff requests of the Board not the program should be continued. fiscal year's budget $300,Oe0 ~ e~ week operation to four days p residences). This will cover the and one driver. SUBMITTED BY: .----, r j /.~ 4 rdner W. Smith, Director ~ General Services Department ~n indication as to whether or Staff will include in next expand the present one day per (automated service to 3,400 cost of one additional truck APPROVED: i Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ------------------- ---------- ------------- VOTE Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to ACTION No Motion by: Garrett Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers Yes Abs ~" ,2 COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA RESERVE FOR BOARD CONTINGE~]CY Original Budget at July 1, 1988 $50,000 June 28, 1988 Funding of Length of Service Benefit for Volunteer Fire, Rescue, and (9,000) Auxiliary Sheriff's Deputies July 26, 1988 Tweed's Access Road (39,405) August 23, 1988 Informational Brochures for November (10,000) Election September 13, 1988 Add to Board Contingency from 50,000 Unappropriated Balance 41 595 Balance as of September 27, 1988 Submitted by Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance ' ) COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA CAPITAL FUND - UNAPPROPRIATED BALANCE Beginning Balance at July 1, 1988 1,637 $ Additional Amount from 1988- 89 Budget 50,000 Balance as of September 27, 1988 Submitted by Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance 51 637 /~' 'S! COUN'T'Y OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA UNAPPROPRIATED BALANCE - GOAL FUND Unaudited Amount at July 1, 1988 $1,380,346 August 9, 1988 Dixie Caverns Landfill Cleanup (400,000) September 13, 1988 Transfer to Board Contingency (50,000) Balance as of September 27, 1988 $ 930,346 The recommended level for fund balance for 1988-89 is $1,748,124, which is 3 percent of the total General Fund budget. Submitted by ~1.~~%TSV ~. ~Y~,ycc~1 Diane D. Hyatt U Director of Finance PETITIONER: CHAPARRAL FOREST ASSOCIATES ~~~ CASE N[~IBER: 33-6/88 Planning Cca~mission Hearing Date: June 7, 1988 and September 6, 1988 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: June 28, 1988 and September 27, 1988 A. REQUEST Petition of Chaparral Forest Associates to rezone a 2.97 acre tract from R-l, Residential to R-5, Residential to construct townhanes, located on the north side of Chaparral- Drive (Route 800) approximately 300 feet west of its intersection with Beacon Drive in the Cave Spring Magisterial District. B. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION There were 14 present in opposition to the request. Robert Turner voiced the following concerns: traffic hazard resulting from two entrances; insufficient sight distance on Chaparral Drive. C. SIGNIFICANT IMPACT FACTORS 1. Comprehensive Plan: 1985 Comprehensive Development Plan has placed this area within a Neighborhood Conservation land use category. This designation discourages develo~cnent of middle to high density residential (6-12 units per acre). Proposed density of develognent is 6.06 units per acre. 2. Site Layout: Revised proffered concept plan ccxnplies with basic site design criteria as specified by the townhouse development ordinance. The revised plan indicates no exceptional housing design or site planning techniques needed for attached residential development (policy NC-8), nor does it avoid residential development having a significantly higher density from that of adjacent developed parcels on western border (policy NC-7). D. PROFFERID CONDITIONS 1. Development will be in substantial conformity with the revised site plan prepared by Horner & Assoc. 2. Building downspouts and pavement drainage to be discharged to a detention facility. 3. Owner to design water system to meet minimum fire flaw requirements for R-5 zoned properties. 4. All existing natural vegetation shall be salvaged to maximum extent possible. 5. All exterior lighting shall be arranged so as to light only the subject property and no interior light poles shall exceed 10 feet in height. E. CDMNIISSIONER'S MOTION, VOTE AND REASON Mr. Witt moved to deny the petition with proffered conditions and stated that the area is designated as Neighborhood Conservation, primarily single family dwellings. Also, no exceptional design which is needed for attached housing is indicated on the revised plan. The motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Witt, Gordon, Winstead NAYS: Robinson, Massey ABSENT: None F. DISSENTING PERSPDCTIVE None. G . ATTACHMENTS / Concept Plan (8~" x 11"> Vicinity Map (8~" x 11") Staff Report Other : ~ ~~/1,t/ Dale Castellaw, Alternate Secretary Roanoke County Planning Commission ~~ ~~~ v~nl~ X11 ~ pNINNtt~ aMY tt~L~t11M~tV $j,; ~; ~ ~a~oH ,~"° A -. ~, Z , r0~~ O' Z - 2 - Yl~~nlll - 3 - 11VR 1 n Chaparral Forest Associates ROANOKE COUNTY R-1 to R-5 - O1 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT Tax Map ~~ 87.10 - 03 r' STAFF REPORT -6 88 PETITIONER: CHAPARRAL FOREST ASSOC. CASE NUMBER: 33 / DATE: JUNE 7, 1988 1988 REVIEWED BY: TIM BEARD REVISED: SEPTEMBER 6, rom located on arral Forest Associates to rruct townhomes,e tract t Petition of Chap Residential to const coximately 300 fee R-1, Residential to R-5, in the Cave the north side of Chaparral Drive (Route 800) aPP its intersection with Beacon Drive (Route 1540) west of Spring Magisterial District. s containing a 1~ NATURE OF REQUEST Conditional request tOivoidu 1 lotsfour building a total of 18 units on in describe project b, Attached revised concept plan and vicinity map more fully. 2, APPLICABLE REGULATIONS that four rict permits townhouse con~trian1O, ndi ratings for sa e. a. R_5 Dist coffered the concep P arcel. Petitioner has p buildings would be constructed within a 2.97 acre fiance with Site plan review will be required to ensure comp b. County regulations. VDOT commercial entrance permits will be required. c. 3, SITE CHARACTERISTICS erty slopes sharply downhill from southwest to TopographY~ Prop located ditch draining a. northeast and includes a central y northeastward. Densely wooded with heciriterior trees and b, Ground Cover• reens dot t undergrowth. Several tall everg Situated within the Cave Spring 4. AREA CHARACTERISTICS rowth area, a, Future Growth Prip,reay. Designated as a stable g Community Planning currently receiving urban services. ed with single family and multifamily d recreation uses. A very limited amount of b, General area is develop residential an undeveloped woodland remains. to the impact of the proposed 5, LAND USE RateCeach factor according Rating 3 manageable impact, action. Use a scale of 1 throug bl impact, licable. 1 = positive impact, 2 = neglig and N/A = not app 4 = disruptive impact, 5 = severe impact, - 4 - ,,.W rr RATING FACTOR COMMENTS ~ '~ LAND USE COMPATIBILITY 4 a. Comprehensive Plan: 1985 Comprehensive Development Plan has placed this area within a Neighborhood Conservation land use category. This designation discourages development of middle to high density residential (6-12 units per acre). Proposed density of development is 6.06 units per acre. 3 b. Surrounding Land: Heavily traveled secondary highway, multifamily and single family residential, developed recreation (Forest Hills Swim and Racquet Club) and woodland. 3 c. Neighboring Area: Single family and multifamily residential. 4 d. Site Layout: Revised proffered concept plan complies with basic site design criteria as specified by the townhouse development ordinance. The revised plan indicates no exceptional housing design or site planning techniques needed for attached residential development (policy NC-8), nor does it avoid residential development having a significantly higher density from that of adjacent developed parcels on western border (policy NC-7). 3 e. Architecture: Concept plan calls for varied front setbacks. Facades, roof lines and exterior building material type not specified. 3 f. Screening and Landscape: Per ordinance. 2 g. Amenities: Adequate parking provided per ordinance including a combination of individual garages, driveways and common parking areas. 3 h. Natural Features: Parcel features steep north and south walls bordering a central natural drainageway terminating at northeast corner of property. TRAFFIC 3 i. Street Capacities: 1986 ADT for Chaparral Drive (VA 800) is 6,428 vehicles. Anticipated additional ADT is 132 vehicle trip ends per day. Two accidents occurred from 1/87 to 2/88 on this 0.6 mile segment of Chaparral Drive. Revised proffered concept plan indicates sight distance improvement at both entrances onto Chaparral Drive (posted speed limit: 35 mph). 3 j. Circulation: Maximum 5$ grade at entrances/exits and minimum 24-foot travel lanes within project boundary are ensured by revised proffered concept plan. Interior travel will be concentrated in central basin of property as previously indicated. UTILITIES 3 k. Water: Adequate source and distribution for domestic purposes anticipated. (See Fire Protection.) 3 1. Sewer: Adequate treatment and transmission anticipated. - 5 - s.°'~7 ~ ..~:': 2 3 3 3 3 2 DRAINAGE Run. m. Basin: Murray n. Floodplain: Not located Detention facility serving all drainage requested to aid corner of property. within FEMA flood hazar avement building downspouts atd northeast natural drainageway PUBLIC SERVICES Within established service standard. Fire ected to be met o. Fire Protection: flow requirements would be increased and are e -inch water line at the,bleeloopin9 or by extending a 1 Lane and posse 6-inch lines in Chaparral Drive. Chaparral Drive and Kelly h design work interconnecting with existing Maintenance of adequate ere flow requested throug conducted by private own Adequate R Within established service standar . escue: ensured by looping entrance/exit P~ ency vehicle access emerg design. No on-site recreation facilities shown or q, Parks and Recreation: proposed. ated If 18 townhouse units are built, it can be anticip r, School: will be six school age residents. Of area schools, that there acity. Estimated cost of educating Cave Spring High is near cap en er year is $22,290 °f talclocal~ costland total six chlldr P funded. The difference between to revenue is +$12499' 1 2 2 2 2 3 TAX BASE Estimated $1,660,000 Land and Improvement Value:None s. - - Taxable Gross SalesNoner. Approximately $19,090 - Total Employees: Year: - Total revenue Approximately/$18-815 New Revenue: ENVIRONMENT t, Air: u. Water: v. Soils: w. Noise: x. Signage: Not specified. areas are limited. Signage options within residential - 6 - .~ 6. 7. olicy NC-7 (avol (1) Inconsistent wlincreases). (2) Inconsistent b, Weaknesses: design and significant residential density with policy NC-8 (provision of exceptional housing site planning techniques). PLAN CONSISTENCY hborhood Conservation. Petitioner's nated as Neig lan map and with Policy This area is desig hborhoods). request is consistent with the land use P nificantly (encourage infill of vacant lots in NCs 7~avoidnsig t along NC-5 The proposal is inconsistent with Par d to adjacent dee~~oPtelimited higher residential densities comp NC_a (p project's western border) and with Policy m loved to achieve residential development when exceptional housing density attached lanning techniques are e P design and site p compatibility). STAFF EVALUATION act on the tax base. (2) COr ov des a, Strengths: (1) Positive imp osal p with policy NC-5 (vacant lot infill). (3) Prop or collector. (4) Petitioner has avement drainage to be direct access onto a dow spouts and P and to the natural proffered all building ~ f ac i l i ty discharged to a detenti n (5) petitioner has drainageway at northeast cornar of nrWaterysystem to meet minimum proffered that owner shall desi9 ro erties. (6) Petitioner fire flow requirements for R-natural vegetation sharoffe ed vthat has proffered that ossibleg (7) Petitioner has p to maximum extenthPing shall be arranged so as to light only the all exter~oreTty and no interior light poles shall exceed 10 subject p P feet in height. 'dance of - 7 - 988-2 VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY -------------------------------------------------------- N r--I rn ,~ IN RE: A 2.97 acre parcel of land, generally located on Northside of Chaparral Drive (Route 800)within the Cave Spring Magisterial District and recorded as Parcel #87.10-3-1 in the Roanoke County Tax Records. FINAL ORDER TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY: H z w H 2 0 U 0 N r~ Q w 0 a a a OSTERHOUDT, FERGUSGN NATT, AHERON & AGEE ATTORNEYS-AT-LAW ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-1699 WHEREAS, your Petitioner, CHAPARRAL FOREST ASSOCIATES, did petition the Board of County Supervisors to rezone the above-referenced parcel of land from R-1 District to R-5 District, for the purpose of constructing 18 townhomes with lots for sale. WHEREAS, after due legal notice, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing of the petition on September 6, 1988, at which time, all parties in interest were given an opportunity to be heard; and WHEREAS, after full consideration, the Bard ~f enie County Supervisors determined that the rezoning be a{apa^~w~d with the proffered conditions., on September 27, 1988. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDERED that the aforementioned parcel of land, which is contained in the Roanoke County Tax t4laps as 48B1 and legally described below, be rezoned from R-1 District to R-5 District. A 2.97 acre parcel of land, generally located on the North side of Chaparral Drive (Route 800), within the Cave Spring - 8 - ,~ x «~ Mag i s ter i a l ~ i1 of 3! 1t i n the rRoanoke County Parcel No. $ Tax Records. with the following conditions: ~1) Development will be in substantial conformity the site plan prepared by Horner ~ Associates, P.C., with presented to the Planning Commission• and avement drainage ~2) All building downspouts p discharged to the detention facility at the northeast to be corner of the property. (3) Natural vegetation shall be salvaged to the maximum extent possible. shall be arranged so as (4) All exterior lighting i ht only the subject property and no interior light to I g poles shall exceed 10 feet in height' stem to meet ~5) Petitioner to design water sy 'nimum fire flow requirements for R-5 zoned properties. mi of this order t3E I T FURTHER RESOLVED t ha t o copy Commission be transmitted to the Secretary of the Planning d that he be directed to reflect that change on the an Official Zoning Map of Roanoke County. DENIED Robers________~ ~4flOP-FC-[~ on motion of Supervisor ____ and upon the seconded by Supervisor _ McGraw _________• OSTERHDUDT. FERGUSON NATT. AHERDN & AGEE fo 1 I owi ng recorded Vote : ATTDRNEYS-AT-LAW Robers , McGraw, Garrett RDANDKE, VIRGINIA Su ervlSOrS Johnson, 24018-1699 AYES : P NAYES:Supervisor Nickens - 9 - 988--~ ABSENT: None Deputy Clerk, Roanoke County Board of Supervisors r3.n3.b cc: File Development & Inspections Arnold Covey, Director, planning Dale Castellow, Acting Director, Jonathan Hartley- Acting ZOEstatedAssessmentr John Wiley, Director, Real ^STERHDUDT, FERGUSGN MATT, AHERON & AGEE A7TDRNEYS-AT-LAW RDANOKE, VIRGINIA 24016-1699 _ 1 O ~~ p, p p E A RAN C E R E Q U E S T _ n ~ ~ Z ~~~`~'~t a n o~ C..~1 a rra. ~ ~~c-ceSt ~ ssoc PUBLIC HEARING ON -t ~ -~jm ~- - ~ to ~ - S mn ~~,rrt~ ~~r tve. I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so that I may comment. I agree to follow the guidelines listed below. WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. 1. Each speaker will have between three and five minutes available whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. 2. Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. 3. All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. 4. Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times . 5. Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. 6, INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. P L E A S E W R I T E L E G I B L Y NAME: coda. Mc~r~u~l ADDRESS : ~~ 3O ~p~2`~ ~O~ ~'~ n~o ke ~l ~ ~. ~ ~ l 8 PHONE : Q9 - `1 ~' 3 PLEASE NOTE: (After filling out, give to the Deputy Clerk. Thank you.) - ~ ~~~-~ A P P E A R A N C E R E 4 U E S T - ~' ! d' ~ Uri < /- PUBLIC HEARING ON L" ~~ = ~, ~x1 ~ ~~ ~ 1 would-like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to I o nize me during the public hearing on the above matter s rec g uidelines listed ,~ that I may comment. I agree to follow the g WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND below. ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. Each speaker will have betwasnanhindividualvorminutes t 1. imi available whether speaking on an issue, and representative. The chairman will decide the time based on the number of citizens speaking ority of will enforce the rule unless instructed by the ma7 the Board to do otherwise. Dint of S eakers will be limited to a presentation be entert fined by 2. P Questions of clarification may view only. the Chairman. 1 comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between 3, Al Baker and audience members is not allowed. a recognized sp at all 4, Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy times . S eakers are requested to leave any written statements 5. P and/or comments with the cler ~ FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL (, INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK E WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTESENTATHEM,FROM THE GROUP FIL ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPR P L E A S E W R I T E L E G I B L Y NAME : ~ .- ~ ji ~, ,~ ~~ /=' ~ ~7` ADDRESS: ,- PHONE: out, give to the Deputy pLEp,SE NOTE: (C1erk.f1Thank you.) L E G A L N O T I C E Notice is hereby given to all interested persons that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at their evening session beginning at 7:00 p.m. on Tuesday, SEPTEMBER 27, 1988 in the Community Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, S.W., Roanoke, Virginia, on the petition of CHAPARRAL FOREST ASSOCIATES requesting rezoning from R-1 RESIDENTIAL to R-5 RESIDENTIAL of a tract containing 2.97 ACRES and located ON THE NORTH SIDE OF TIONWITH BEA ON (DRIVE 8ROUT~1940)MinEthe3CAVEESPRINGT OF ITS INTERSEC Magisterial District. Rezoning has been requested to CONSTRUCT TOMEHOMES WITH INDIVIDUAL LOTS FOR SALE. The County Planning Commission recommends DENIAL. A copy of the Zoning Ordinance of Roanoke County and amendments thereto as well as a copy of the petition, site plan, and other documents related to this request may be examined in the office of the Department of Planning and Zoning, located in Room 600 of the Roanoke County Administration Center. Roanoke County will provide assistance to handicapped persons desiring to attend public hearings. Such individuals are requested to contact the County office of Personnel Services ([703] 772-2018) if special provisions are necessary for attendance. Given under my hand this SEVENTH day of SEPTEMBER, 1988. ~'Y?~~-- .~- Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Please publish in the evening edition of the Roanoke Times and World News on: TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 13, 1988 TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 20, 1988 Direct the bill for Publication to: EDWARD NATT 1919 ELECTRIC ROAD ROANOKE, VA. 24018 774-1197 D R A F T L E G A L N O T I C E Notice is hereby given to all interested persons that the ublic hearing at their Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a p ~~~~,~~ Z7 innin at 7:00 p.m. on Tuesday, evening session beg g Administration Center, 1988, in the Community Room of the Roanoke County 3738 Brambleton Avenue, S.W., Roanoke, Virginia, on the petition of requesting ~ b QE A aLl Hta,Pla to Q -~ FL~S~t~En1T~L rezoning from n _~ 2~51DEta'r-~~- and of a tract containing Z 97 aca~5 _,_..~~ ,.T located bNTNC No i or `-r°'.T ' n the c.,~av~ ~PR1-~G Magisterial District. c~tnuNWRH BEQ~`~ ~r£1540~ Tnw~~ur,rnE~ WrrH iN~iy~ouNL Rezoning has been requested to "'The County Planning Commission Ldp FbR recommends ~ENi4•~- A copy of the Zoning Ordinance of Roanoke Counandaoaherendments of the petition, site plan, thereto as well as a copy documents related to this request may be examined in the office of the De artment of Planning and Zoning, located in Room 600 of the Roanoke p County Administration Center. rovide assistance to handicapped persons Roanoke County will p Such individuals are requested to desiring to attend public hearings. 772_2018) if contact the County office of Personnel Services ([703] special provisions are necessary for attendance. o hand this ~~ day of Se-~"`t3ER 1988. Giv..n under my Please publish in the evening edition of the Roanoke Times and World News on: Tuesday ~jE(~-~t~ER ~3. 1a8~ Tuesday 5~~-r'~c3~~ ~° ~~$$ Direct the bill for Publication to: EI vrp~ A . N A 191~i FJ.ECTR~c IIcbD . S W LZbPNbKE ~~• • Z.~W ~$ 9~~ • CBi, ~,1~G~1`Tr INC. ~ ,~,.~.,~ ~ , PETi"~tONF~. 37-7/88 CASE NCMBERs Planning Carenission Hearing Date: July 5, 1988 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date:. July 26, 1988 Industrial A• QUEST anent, Inc. to rezone a 4.13 acre tract franl~l, Petition of CBL Manag in center located west of Merriman Road to B-2, Business to construct a shopp g ute 613) approximately 100 feet south of its intersection with Starkey Roa (Ro isterial District. (Route 904) in the Cave Spring Mag B. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION rt and one in opposition. Mr. David Kidd said he Attending were seven in suppo a roblans. was concerned with potential drainag P IMPACT FACTORS rovided at two points along Merriman. C • SIG1~iIFICANT etitioner should have his engineer 1, Circulation: Access will be p According to comments from VDOT, the p ck the horizontal sight distance along Merriman Road to ensure that the the 1 with c~nmercial entrance standards. proposed entrances will camp y D. pgO~~ED CONDITIONS ses: convenience 1• The property will not be used for any of hall ~ motorgveh le dealer hone, store, hotel, motel, theater, assembly funeral home, commercial kennel, home for adults, hospital, nursing e flea market, or public dance hall. ints along th 2, Access to Merriman Road will be limited to not more than ~O Pon the subject frontage of the property. 3, No signs other than those adveitoi ~~ g businesses locate ° number and property will be erected on the P ~ cable limitations on size, 4. Petitioner will comply with app or pylon signs on location of signs and i 1 ~ a edoto either one signsofnaot m°r f tno~ mo~ ~ han the property will be ft• and the other o or two signs, one of not more than 140 sq. 80 sq.ft. Y an or lanting Parking areas will be aestheticall treated with landscaping d/ P 5. areas. 6. All durnpster sites will be screened. ro rt will be 30 ft. Lighting 7. The maximum height of lights poles on the p Pe Y 'l1 be directed onto the parking areas, and the maximum light level at the wi used for residential purposes property line adjacent to properties being shall not exceed 1 foot candle. market of 25,000 sq.ft. or more. 8. Use of the property will include a supe E. ~1ISSIONER'S MOTION, VOTE AND ~~ tion with proffered conditions. The motion Mr. Witt moved to approve the p carried with the following roll call vote: Witt, Gordon, Robinson, Winstead AYES: NAYS: None p,BS~; None F. DISSENTING PERSPDCTIVE None. G. ATTACEIl~TS ~~ x 11") Concept Plan (8~~~ x 11") Vicinity Map (8~ ~r ~~~'' Staff Report Other: Dale Castellaw, Alternate Secretary Roanoke County Planning Commission ' ACTION # ITEI-i NUI~SBER_~-~~ REGULAR I-iEETING OF THE BOARDOKE COUNTYIADMINOISTRATIONE AT A COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROA CENTER MEETING DATE September 27, 1988 , AG_. ENDp, ITEM a request by CBL Additional backgro~odrezonemat4o13racredtract fconstructing a Ianagement, Inc ur ose of Industrial to B-2, Business for the p p shopping center on Merriman Road. Cp_ U_ NTY ADMINISTRATOR' S COi~iI BACKGROUND consideration of a rezoning petition from CBL During Management, Inc. to rezone a 4•theaBoardroftSuperviisors Industrial to B-2, Commercial, re are additional lanning and zoning staff to p p directed the p background information regarding' stal Creek Drive and p,) The proposed road iaCtoonmthesCBLrrequest; their potential imp act of this request on the County's B} The potential imp adopted Economic Development Strategy, 75/25; e of this parcel if developed as C} The potential tax advantag commercial in comparison to a comparable industrial development; 's zoning provisions regarding D} Clarification of the County commercial development in areas zoned industrial. SUI~iNiA1?Y OF INFORMATION 's following information F~ras prentrsaaffththeeCountytance Thi of the County's Economic Developm Assessor's Office and the Virginia Department of Transportation. A) Transportation Issue: ertaining to the t to identify the issues p otential In an attemp staff met planned improvement of Crystal Creek DandeZoningts p impact on this rezoning, the Planning Markham of the Design and Location section of the with Larry artment of Salem District Ofd rCeMarkham advisedatDat c~~hile onro~ect, it Transportation. work is complete on this act on the preliminary engineering appears the planned improvement would have no imp 98~` :~ proposed rezoning. At this time VDOT is considering two alternative routes for The first alternative improvement of Crystal Creek Drive horizontal curve on would be to eliminate the existinghe route southwardly Crystal Creek Drive by extending it with through the Starkey Park property and aligning and Road at the existing intersection of Starkey rove Starkey If approved, this alternative would imp Merriman Roads. creating road frontage on both access to the CBL site by unrelated to P•4erriman Road and Crys~hisCalterDative ~aouldohave a major the rezoning request, impact on Starkey Park. The second alternative would be to merely straighten the stal Creek Drive, but allow the horizontal curve on Cry stal Creek Drive and Merriman existing intersection at Cry ust north of 7 Road to remain at its current location (1•e'' stal the CBL site). In this case east-west tRoad1andoCry Continue to travel the "dog leg between Starkey rovement's This would detract from the imp Creek Drive. effectiveness as an east-~'7eSOUldnhavelno impactnonothesCBL and 221. This alternative w site (or Starkey Park). For an illustration of the proposed limits of the Crystal Creek Drive improvements, see Figure 1. B) Economic Development Issue: ted an the Board of Supervisors adop the County In October of 1987, to assist in meeting economic development strategy the tax base goal of 75/25 residential/commelnilightdoftthis policy, the revenue balance) development. a neighborhood commercial CBL proposal, which is to develop roximately 34,000 square feet in size, shopping center app should not adversely affect the County's goa . roximate- The County Assessor's Office estimates the~eo ertyawithin the ly 720 acres of industrially zoned (i°2-1) p p Because much of this property is situated within the county. artier uninterested in flood hazard area or own~hebeconomic development staff industrial developme200 acres are actually available for estimates that only ust 80 acres ar.e actually ready-to-g° ublic utilities). The development and that j (i,e,, have road access with adndustrial site. to-go CBL site is not a ready- approximately 66 rezonings have occurred where Since 1976, s has ro erty has been rezoned eitherc~oofrthese relzoningdustria p p The net total effe zoned designation. beers to create an additional 138 acres of industria y art eleven years this amounts to {1~1-1 ) property. Over th p 12. 5 acres of 1~5-1 an average net gain of approximately er year. If we include all other industrial property p t:i_2, General industrial zoning classifications (1•e'' during this same Industrial and M-3, Special Industrial}, zoned property period a net gain of 294 acres of industrially occurred in Roanoke County. ' 's economic ~~~`~ the CBL site as an example, the county otential ~Sillg development staff h~s compiled a scenario of t ret is in question. Assuming these scenarios uses for the proper Y of these types, i represent a "typical" industry a arent that a grocery/retail center would offer the bes pp to the county. tax advantage Plastics Kennel Grocery Store Products SIC 075) (SIC 541) (SIC 308) ( 2 70 80 Number of Employees S29b $350 5185 Average Weekly Stage 18,200 9,620 15,392 370 Average Annual Wage 2p,720 28,000 Total Weekly Wages 2,240,000 19,240 1,450,400 N/A N/A Total Annual Wages 6,000,000 155,000 Annual Sales 140,000 1,750,000 1 782 Land & Building Value 1, 27,816b,c,d 73,110a 6,784 446 Annual Tax Revenue 17,832 Tax Return (Per Acre} ;60,000) a- includes county portion of taxable sa1e562ebased on b- includes pachinery and Tools tax of $6~ ear. $875,000 at 25o assessment for the first y c- includes taxes on automobi25s0 vadUerucks less than two 35 tons of 5394 based on S1 ~ reater of S7 d- includes taxes00nvaluekandfassessmentaratio of b0 0• based on $25,0 ertaining to the impact of the CBL rezoning Other comments p At this time on the County's economic developmen~oegoositefocus on t e fact that this site is not a reidYto accommodate either it lacks an adequate water supp In addition, the existing commercial or industrial uses. side of the road to be of any railt•Jay is located on the wrong Finally, the County's benefit to a potential industry. ark sites such as the marketing efforts have focused on p~ County's Southwest Industrial Park rather than individual sites. C} Tax Revenue Issue: Not addressed above is the possibility of a major manufacturings firm locating on this site. Although it is doubtful due to the limited size of the site, there are Should such an examples of c~ahere large resiorllesseinisizendustries ave located on sites four ac the tax revenues realized from industry locate on this site,at least initially, would the machinery and tools tax, outweigh any sales tax revenues realizedHp7ever,csincecthe establishment such as a grocery store. value of machinery and toSes aheaeasesalesdtaxerevenues revenues generally decrea , typically remain stable. in the short term, a With regard to fiscal impacts, ro osed grocery store, commercial establishment, such as the p p creates more of a strain oneXhe basic infrastructure t an a As an example, commercial comparable induically gompl development typ enerates much more traffic and rescue and law enforcement ~8~.~ •~ extensive 'fire, However, over requires mo~~- services than similar industrial developmen . the long term, the fiscal impacts of industrial devThPpment can exceed the 1mpathisoshiftmiscthe subsequenttrehedCounty primary reason for growth which follows industrial development. As new experiences growth in areas such as basic anduultimately employees increase the demand for hThesegsame impacts are increase the demand for services. but to a much lesser realized ~~~ith commercial development, offers lower ~-aages ex*_ent. Commercial development toptunities. For the most and less full-time employment opp eneral commercial establishments offer part, retail and g employment opportunities which do not impact t e secondary as industrial local housing market as significantly development. D) Zoning 0rrdinance Issue: With regard to the issue of permitted commercial uses in the County's Zoning ordinance was areas zoned industrial, ermit B-2, General Commercial amended in October of 1987 to p ecial uses in M-1, Light Industrial DtherBoardwofnSupervisors. exception permit is granted by inion that this it is the Zoning administrator's op However, ark settings to provision was intended for industrially was not intended for accommodate mixed use developments. happen to be individual sites despite the fact that thearkaor grouped located in the vir_inity of an industrial p administrator industrial uses. Consequently, the zoning would etitioner (CBL I.lanagement) that a rezoning advised the p be required to permit a commercial establishment on this site. ALTERNATIVES AND IMPACTS. rovide additional backgronod This report is intended to petition only; therefore, information for a rezoning p rovided. alternatives or impacts are p STAFF RECOI~I°iENDATION to Commission held a public hearing On July 5 the Planning CBL Management, review the rezoning petition submitted by Inc, At that time the Planning Commission recommended It is County policy that staff approval of this regrecommendations regarding rezoning refrain from making petitions. 988 ~~ SUBMITTED BY: ~/ti~R Dale Castellow Acting Director of Planning APPROVED: C~%',2~ Elmer C. Ho ge County Administrator '-'----- VOTE ACTION No yes Abs Approved ( ) Motion by: Garrett Denied ~ ) Johnson Received ( ) McGraw Referred Nickens to Robers 0 0 s v S g_ ~ V d `~ W t'Q r Z W W 7 `LW, ~ 0 ~`\•~1 TVA V V- Q A 1 1_ D~~ Q ~ D ~~ \~ Q Y ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ w _~ \' 1 \~~r. \`~ ~0 \~ R ~»\ ~~ ,~ W I m.~ -188 ~3 ~~ 10•'~ O A o~ O • `! a•~ ~e• ~• • ~ ~~R Q'o N ~ - i~ _` ~ i ~_ ' OOa ~~ ~~ YO W IJJ~w V Q.~ Q Y ~! ,~.~~ .e. N N ~ee Y LV . A ~~Q r O Y ~,g =- - . , ........ , 6~ ~~~1~0~6 } vl ~NI r3~ Sl/'P. NA ,IJ.N(lOJ ~>IONV02i •'••.••<•,'•-•.••• l~!JLJO~ ~' ~ i i °' 7 ~ _ _ _-- - =T'- ~ uH.LN3J ONI.I~OIISCI~S0~1021d «;=•,,.M, ~' ~ ~j`v~~ o, ~ ,~ U = i i = 0 0 r ~~b~! N \ •'' 0 N~ ~'~J~ .~1/ O \~.• \~ •. n ;~~~ ' \ © W z 1 T,. 4V\~ . v x ~ O~ \~ Vj ~ N ~ a hb'~IY \ m ~ 1G z w ~\~/ In _N ~ ~ l zJ ~ k E• „ , K_ _ ~ u =J i i~ r 1 ~ ~ I I I 1 1 • o . ,. . '~-If-'f-l~'f~'I~-I~' ` : . ui 1 11'11111 ` - iiu; ~i ~ i 1 j _ ' 1 ~~ Y ~ ~ • _ L s Y t~J o / Z ^ ~ z i -~ ~, x /C -- --_ ~ / ~ ~7-- ~ ~ ~~ ,~ z F- % ~ _-~__ ~ ~ -- Y y j -_ ~ L `O _ - ` L Z _~ e ` i :~ cg 1 ~ -^~ _ c _ r _~ ~ ' - c = ~ _ L v < c v G UV C Z '~ z L~ r <~ ~ ~ G = ~ ~4 \ ~ ` F $J Sd ~x • FFF_` ~ ~ C 1 (; ~V ~~/ .L U Z z 0 N U Z F x N7 i~~~ ~ `~ I ~'~' -~ :~ u u < < < a s ~^"yl +~ o ~. o o"i~ o (; o ` o i s ~ u ~ < C ~ U `a Y• t Y~ Y -K S t ~'ti~ .S 2 ~''~'; ~Q -3 unpru .., ~. ~ ~ ~ - 3 - ~e. CBL Management Inc. }_ ROANOKE COUNTY Rezoning T1-1 to B-2 d5 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT Tax riap /{97.01-2-10 ,„ ~ iv~t~t l [ li1HC" STAFF REPORT CASE NUtdBER: 37-7/88 REVIEWED BY: Jon Hartley ?~~' 9~ z~--~ PETITIONER: CBL Management, Inc. DATE: June 30, 1988 Petition of CBL Management, Inc. to rezone a 4.13 accenterclocatedMwest of Industrial to B-2, Business troximatelyt100sfeetlsouth of its intersection Merriman Road (Route 613) app with Starkey Road (Route 904) in the Cave Spring tgagisterial District. 1. NATURE OF REQUEST a. Conditional request to rezone 4•lingccenter which wouldncontainaa 33,762 sq. ft. neighborhood shopp retail shops. Additional national chain supermarket and five {5) space along Merriman Roadsh~e best has beenereducedusincebtheding site. The acreage of thi q original application from sOnowtexcludedcfromathehpetitiontwouldhe petitioner. The 6.67 acre remain M-1. b. Attached concept plan and vicinity map illustrate the project more fully. 2. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS a. The B-2, General Commercial District permits a wide vermitted commercial and office uses (see enclosed listing of p uses). Petitioner has proffered conditions on tconditionsthe future building site, but has not proffered any restricting uses of the shopping center. b. Site plan review will be required to ensure .compliance with County regulations. c. Commercial entrance permits will be required from the Virginia Department of Transportation. 3. SITE CHARACTERISTICS -- a. Topography: Site is flat and is in the process of being fille to raise the elevation of the site. b. Ground Cover: The site is open and sparsely vegetated due to current filling activities. 4. AREA CHARACTERISTICS a. Future Growth Priority: Community Planning Area. to stabilize growth. Urb b. General area is developed commercial, institutional and open space. Situated within the Cave Spring The growth initiative for this area is ~n services are available. with a mixture of industrial, and residential uses, and vacant land - 4 - ~~~~~ 9 5. LAND USE IMPACT ASSESSMENT Rate each factor according to the impact of the proposed Rating: action. Use a scale of 1 through 5• = mana eable impact, 4 = 1 = positive impact, 2 = negligible impact, 3 g licable. disruptive impact, 5 = severe impact, and N/A = not app RATING FACTOR COI~SMENTS LAND USE CO1~[PATIBILITY 2 a. Comprehensive Plan: 1985 Comprehensive DevelopmenThelan has placed this area within a Core land use category. petitioner's request is consistent with both the loraiveeoflPolicy and policies. In particular, the proposal is supp C-1, Encourage development of intensive urban uses in designated core areas. 3 b. Surrounding Land: Surrounding uses include residential and industrial uses and open space. 2 c. Neighboring Area: The neighboring area consists of residential, commercial and industrial land uses and open space. 3 d. Site Layout: Petitioner has not proffered as a condition the concept plan submitted with the application in order to maintain flexibility in marketing the project. Howeverspace,candept plan submitted indicates adequate parking, loading landscaping. Interior circulation in the parking area appears adequate, but access to the rear of the property would require traversing the parking area. 3 e. Architecture: No indication of the style of architecture or type of materials has been provided. 2 f. Screening and Landscaping: Surrounding zoning is either more intensive or equal to the B-2 zoning requested. This WOThe eliminate any requirements for screening or buffering. residence to the north esolodaBed)onsthersamedlotch of the year by a line of deciduous tre 3 g. Amenities: No proffer of conditions have bee~ovisions pnrthening to the screening of the dumpster or lighting p parking and loading areas. 2 h. Natural Amenities: TRAFFIC trips (ADT) on Merriman 3 i. Street Capacities: Current average daily Road (Route 613) was 1797 south of Starkey Road (Route (904). Additional ADT, based on the submitted concep98plan the3vicinity There was only one reported accident during of this site on Merriman Road. The six year plan for road improvements includes money for planning and engineering work to redesign and realign Cr~oadl Springs Road (Route 897) to irovide a better connecting - 5 - 221 using Buck Mt. Road, tarkey Road between Route 220 and Route , and Crystal Springs Road. This petition does not appear to negatively affect this project. 4 j. Circulation: Access will be provided at two points along _ the petitioner Merriman Road. According to comments from VDOT, should have his engineer check the horizontal sight distance along Merriman Road to insure that the proposed entrances will comply with commercial entrance standards. No proffer of conditions have been offered in relationship to the total number of entrances for this parcel or for the future building site. UTILITIES 2 k. Water: Proposal will have no adverse affect on water supply system. This project would require substantial off-site improvements, at the developer's expense (with County off-site credit policy}, in order to obtain the necessary water service from the intersection of Starkey Road and Buck Mountain Road. 2 1. Sewer: Proposal will have no adverse affect on sewer service. DRAINAGE 2 m. Basin: Proposed site is located in the Back Creek drainage basin. 2 n. Floodplain: This proposal appears to be located outside the 100 year flood plain but may be located within the 500 year flood plain. As part of the site plan review process, petitioner will be required to submit documentation establishing the 100 year flood elevation for the building site, pursuant to Section 21-61, and will be required to elevate any buildings one foot above that elevation. PUBLIC SERVICES 2 0. Fire Protection: Within established service standard. 2 p. Rescue: Within established service standard. N/A Park s. and Recreation: _ N/A r. Schools: 1 s. 2 t. 2 u. 2 v. TAX BASE - Land and Improvement Value: $ 1,088,375 (new) - Taxable Gross Sales/Year: $ 6,000,000 (new) - Total Employees: 70 - Total Revenue to the County/Year: ENVIRONMENT Air: Water: Soils: Approximately $ 72,516 (new) - 6 - ~~ 3 w. Noise: Increased traffic can be expected to increase noise levels in the vicinity of this project. 3 x. Signage: Under the B-2 zoning the property would be permit a total of approximately 800 sq. ft. of Signage. The petitioner has verbally indicated a willingness to proffer as a condition less total Signage but`has not submitted a specific amount. 6. PLAN CONSISTENCY This area is designated as Core in the 1985 Comprehensive Development Plan. The petitioner's request is consistent with both the land use plan map and policies. 7. STAFF EVALUATION a. Strengths: (1) Proposed project would improve the local tax base. (2) Would provide services presently not available in the vicinity of the project. b. Weaknesses: (1) No proffer of conditions have been offered restricting uses of the neighborhood shopping center, site layout, number of access points, Signage or other aspects of the project. (2) Limited sight distance may restrict the location and number of access points. c. Proffers Suggested: (1) The following uses should be restricted from the entire property: convenience store, hotels, motels, theaters, assembly halls, new car dealership, funeral homes, commercial kennels, home for adults, hospitACCessutoing homes, flea markets and public dance halls. (2) Merriman Road should be limited to no more than two points along the frontage of this property, including the future building site (outparcel) shown on the concept plan. (3) Signage should be limited to no more than one foot per linear foot of frontage. (4) Parking area should include landscaped planting areas at reasonable intervals. (5) Dumpster site should be screened. (6) The maximum light pole height should be thirty feet (30') and directed inward onto the parking areas and that-the maximum light levels at the property lines adjacent to residential properties should not exceed one candle foot. - 7 - J~'`j 988-3 VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY A 4.13± acre parcel of land, generally ? located on the west side of Virginia ) Secondary Route 613 near its inter- ~ FINAL ORDER section with Route 904 within the 00 Cave Spring Magisterial District, ) ~ and being the eastern 4.13 acres of ~ parcel #97.01-02-10 in the Roanoke j ~ County Tax Records. TO THE HONORABLE STPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY: •• WHEREAS, your Petitioner CBL Management, Inc. did petition H 2 w the Board of County Supervisors to rezone the above-reference H ~ parcel from M-l, Light Industrial District to B-2, General N Commercial District for the purpose of constructing thereon a '~ neighborhood shopping center. A W WHEREAS, after due legal notice, the Planning Commission O w did hold a public hearing of the petition on July 5, 1988, at which time all parties in interest were given an opportunity to be heard; and WHEREAS, after full consideration at the public hearing September 27, 1988 held on ~-~~ -~,-~-- the Board of County Supervisors de- termined that the rezoning be approved, subject to conditions proffered by the petitioner. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDERED that the aforementioned parcel of land, which is contained in the Roanoke County Tax Maps as Parcel 97.01-02-10 and recorded in Deed Book 1064, Page 222 and legally described below, be rezoned from M-1, bight Industrial District to B-2, General Commercial District. - 8 - ~'y 9s~ -.~ Legal Description of Property: BEGINNING at a point on the west line of Va. Sec. Rt. 613 corner to the property of Hubert E. Harris; thence with the west line of Rt. 613 a curve to the right whose chord is S 5° 46' 13" W 175.31 feet an arc distance of 176.06 feet, and S 18° 05' S0" W 244.42 feet to a point; thence a new line S 77° 03' W 485.0 feet to a point; thence a new line N. 17° 23' W. 31?..0 feet, more or less, to a point; thence with the outside line N 71° 46' 30" E 695.0 feet to the place of BEGINNING. BE IT FURTHER. ORDERED that a copy of this order be trans- mitted to the Secretary of the Planning Commission and that he be directed to reflect that change on the official zoning map of Roanoke County. ADOPTED on motion of Supervisor Nickens and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: Supervisor Robers ABSENT: None %~;Y~-cam l~ ~ C ~~-~ Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Development & Inspections Dale Castellow, Acting Director, Planning Jonathan Hartley, Acting Zoning Administrator John Wiley, Director, Real Estate Assessment - 9 - ~ ~. L ~~~ VIF.GINIA: BEFORE THE BOARD OF StPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY A 4.13± acre parcel of land, generally ) SECOND located on the west side of Virginia ) AMENDED Secondary Route 613 near its inter- ) PROFFER section with Route 904 within the ) OF ~ Cave Spring Magisterial District, ) CONDITIONS ~ and being the eastern 4.13 acres of ) ~ parcel #97.01-02-10 in the Roanoke ) ~ County Tax Records. ) TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY: z of Virginia and Sec. 21-105E of the Roanoke County Zoning w z Ordinance, the Petitioner CBL Management, Inc. hereby volun- 0 U o tarily proffers to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, h ~ Virginia the following conditions to the rezoning of the Q above-referenced parcel of land: w o (1) The property will not be used for any of the follow- er a ~ ing purposes: convenience store, hotel, motel, theater, assembly hall, motor vehicle dealership, funeral home, commer- cial kennel, home for adults, hospital, nursing home, flea market, or public dance hall. Being in accord with Sec. 15.1-491.1 et seq. of the Code (2) Access to Merriman Road (Route 613) will be limited to not more than-two points along the frontage of the property. (3) No signs other than those advertising businesses located on the subject property will be erected on the proper- ty. (4) Petitioner will comply with applicable limitations on size, number and location of signs and in addition agrees that - 10 - ~~ 1,~f1' ° ~ freestanding or pylon signs on the property will be limited to either (a) one sign of not more than two hundred (200) square feet or (b) two signs, one of not more than one hundred forty (140) square feet and the other of not more than eighty (80) square feet. (5) Parking areas will be aesthetically treated with landscaping and/or planting areas. (6) All dumpster sites will be screened. (7) The maximum height of light poles on the property will be thirty (30) feet. Lighting will be directed onto the parking areas, and the maximum light level at the property line adjacent to properties being used for residential purposes shall not exceed one (1) foot candle. (8) Use of the property will include a supermarket of 25,000 square feet or more. Respectfully submitted, CBL MANAGEMENT, 'I//j7/~~J~C. By ~~~``~ T..°" ~ Petition (" . n .. _. r ,~ ~' - 11 - ~'. VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY A 4.13± acre parcel of land, generally ) located on the west side of Virginia ) Secondary Route 613 near its inter- ) RECOMMENDATION section with Route 904 within the ) Cave Spring Magisterial District, ) and being the eastern 4.13 acres of ) parcel #97.01-02-10 in the Roanoke j County Tax Records. TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY: WHEREAS, your Petitioner CBL Management, Inc. has filed with the Secretary to the Planning Commission a petition to rezone the above-referenced parcel of land from M-1, Light Industrial District to B-2, General Commercial District for the purpose of constructing thereon a neighborhood shopping center. WHEREAS, the petition was referred to the Planning Commission which, after due legal notice as required by Section 15.1-431 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended, did hold a public hearing on July 5, 1988; and WHEREAS, at that public hearing all parties in interest were afforded an opportunity to be heard; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due consideration has recommended to the Board of County Supervisors that the rezoning be approved, subject to conditions proffered by the petitioner. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commis- sion recommends to the Board of County Supervisors that the above-referenced parcel of land be rezoned from M-1, Light ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~+ "'~ Industrial District, to B-2, General Commercial District, subject to conditions proffered by the petitioner. The above action was adopted on motion of Commissioner Witt and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Messrs. Witt, Robinson, Winstead and Gordon NAYS: None ABSENT: Respectfully submitted, Alternate Secretary Roanoke County Planning Commission -2- 9S~ . 3 OSTERHGIIOT, FERGLISOI NATT, AHERGN & AGEE ATTORNEYS-AT-LAW ROANGKE, VIRGINIA 24G18-1699 VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY_SUPERVISORS OF_ROANOKE_COUNTY IN RE: ) RECOIIMIIENDAT I ON A 2.97 acre parcel of land, generally ) located on Northside of Chaparral Urive ) (Route 800) within the Cave Spring ) Magisterial District and recorded as ) Parcel #87.10-3-1 in the Roanoke County j Tax Records. TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY: WHEREAS, your Petitioner, CHAPARRAL FOREST ASSOCIATES, has filed with the Secretary to the Planning Commission a petition to rezone the above-referenced parcel of land from R-1 District to R-5 District for the purpose of constructing 18 townhomes with lots for sale. WHEREAS, the petition was referred to the Planning Commission which, after due legal notice as required by Section 15.1-431 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended, did hold a public hearing on September 6, 1988; and WHEREAS, at that public hearing all parties in interest were afforded an opportunity to be heard; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due consideration has recommended to the Board of County Supervisors that the rezoning be denied. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission recommends to the Board of County Supervisors that the rezoning of the above-referenced parcel of land to U~~ R-5 District, subject to the proferred conditions, be denied. The above action was adopted on motion of Mr. Witt and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Mr. Witt, Mr. Winstead, Mr. Gordon NAYS: Mr. Robinson, Mr. Massie ABSENT: r3.n2.b Respectfully submitted, ~../~ Alternate Secretary Roanoke County Planning Commission OSTERHOUDT, FERGUSO' NATT, AHERDN & AGEE ATTDRNEY5-AT-LAW RDANDKE, VIRGINIA 24D18-1699 2 .~ c A P P E A R A N C E R E Q U E S T ~~~-3 PUBLIC HEARING ON C iJL ~H,n z ~ m~~~ _'~ ~ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so that I may comment. I agree to follow the guidelines listed below. WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. 1. Each speaker will have between three and five minutes available whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. 2. Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. 3. All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. 4. Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times . 5. Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. 6. INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. NAME: P L E A S E W R I T E L E G I B L Y - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ' =~;od~~ ~. ~ 1~~~)i ADDRESS : ~ G-~ ~-7'~2-1GE ~`ti' ~ n C ' ~ PHONE : ~i ~ y' ~- ` ~~ PLEASE NOTE: (After filling out, give to the Deputy Clerk. Thank you. L E G A L N O T I C E Notice is hereby given to all interested persons that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at their. evening session beginning at~7:00 p.m. on Tuesday, SEPTEMBER 27, 1988 in the Community Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, S.W., Roanoke, Virginia, on the petition of CBL MANAGEMENT, INC.. requesting rezoning from M-1 INDUSTRIAL to B-2 BUSINESS of a tract containing 4.13 ACRES and located ON THE WEST SIDE OF MERRIMAN ROAD (ROUTE 613) APPROXIMATELY 100 FEET SOUTH OF STARKEY ROAD (ROUTE 904) in the CAVE SPRING Magisterial District. Rezoning has been requested to CONSTRUCT A SHOPPING CENTER. The County Planning Commission recommends APPROVAL WITH PROFFERED CONDITIONS. A copy of the Zoning Ordinance of Roanoke County and amendments thereto as well as a copy of the petition, site plan, and other documents related to this request may be examined in the office of the Department of Planning and Zoning, located in Room 600 of the Roanoke County Administration Center. Roanoke County will provide assistance to handicapped persons desiring to attend public hearings. Such individuals are requested to contact the County office of Personnel Services ([703] 772-2018) if special provisions are necessary for attendance. Given under my hand this SEVENTH day of SEPTEMBER, 1988. Mary H. A len, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Please publish in the evening edition of the Roanoke Times and World News on: TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 13, 1988 TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 20, 1988 Direct the bill for Publication to: ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS P. 0. BOX 29800 ROANOKE, VA. 24018 X88 _.~ PETITIOI~R: RICHARD AMID TAMARA Cr~~ T, CASE NtA~1BER: 43-9/88 Planning Ca~nission Hearing Date: September 6, 1988 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: September 27, 1988 A. REQUEST Petition of Richard and Tamara Carrell for a Use Not Provided For Permit to operate a dog boarding kennel and to conduct obedience training classes, in addi- tion to a residence on a 3.079 acre tract located immediately east of the termi- nus of Old Virginia Springs Road (Route 667) in the Vinton Magisterial District. B. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION No one in opposition was present at the Planning Commission Public Hearing. C. SIGNIFICANT IMPACT FACZ~RS 1. Fire Protection: Outside established service standard. 2. Rescue: Outside established service standard. D. PROFFERED CONDITIONS 1. No kennel will be constructed within 150 feet of the property line, as of 4/5/88, between our property and that of Bonnie McCutcheon. 2. No business usage of any sort will be within 150 feet of the property line described in condition one. 3. No kennel will be constructed within 200 feet of Route 667. 4. There will be no more than 15 kennels built for catmtercial purposes; with a total of not more than 27 dogs resident on the premises. 5. The kennel facility and training area will be fenced to ensure that no dogs may escape. 6. There will be one sign which will be wooden and non-illuminated. 7. A kennel silencer will be installed and maintained in the crcial kennel. 8. The parking area for the training classes will be at least 50 feet fran Route 667. 9. The training area will be at least 200 feet from Route 667. 10. Parking for the kennel will be located behind the kennel at the top of the hill. 11. All dogs on this property for boarding or training purposes will be on a leash or confined by a secure fence. 12. There will be no more than 3 hours of group classes a day. 13. There will be no group classes on Sundays. 14. There will be no more than 15 dogs in group obedience classes. No training will occur after 9 p.m. 15. Dogs in the training area for exercise will not exceed 5 and will always be supervised by applicant or employee of applicant. No dogs will be in the training area at any time unless for training or for exercise. When any dog is in the training area for training, no dogs shall be present for exercise; and when any dog is in the training area for exercise, no dogs shall be present for training. 16. Pine trees will be planted and maintained on 7 ft. centers along Old Virginia Springs Road adjacent to parking areas. 98 S- .~ E. COMMISSIONER'S MOTION, W`!'E AND REASON Mr. Robinson moved to approve the petition with proffered conditions. The motion carried with the following roll cal'1 vote: AYES: Robinson, Massey, Witt, Gordon, Winstead NAYS: None ABSENT: None F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE None. G . ATTAQ3NIEI~I'S Concept Plan (8~" x 11") Vicinity Map (8~" x 11") Staf f Report Other: Dale Castellow, Alternate Secretary Roanoke County Planning C~unission - 2 - MA...__ Os Ile4 BOUNDARY DATA 3.oT! AcRts eyes. elARluc DISTAUt6 3-• Il.le'4J' S!'1. S01•aG !c-+++ntf oA• Ov lrMa Al s-c s.s4•-w!•aa. 11T.1e ,, /IiJI~ "r~Ft~1.111,1v /1R,tA ~ p T Gf1Pf~6t- ~ti~ T'n1,n~Nf1 M. ~n~,R,~.~ t a ~ r 1 Y Pao-ttTY or f, ~~ ~ OlttN Il. HAaTMAW • ~, ,I,~ 0. 0! 0 At,Te a! CoYra`f~• Tf ~/ OllaY 0•NA.TMAM aY/C.la i. •Y + q• A MaAwea ei ae~A 11. Mueea 1 A is +G ,~, VPf•T!f 1 ~07y_y a •.•~''0.• ~ ` }pp~,•~~ K"ic- n"•' ,`e a •, o Mr+Y,RT• CaG'' yJ s f`oR. 2J.nS~LL 4_ S)~,X. TOVA• ~ (11~/~ ~''r`;---1 1 ~`,,,,! - ~~~~4eas~BOONOARY OATH ~- /, ~ (.]/' l 1 ~, ~a 1•! IJ.11•lT41•W. !0].41 ° ~ ~a ~fLUGE h t-11 1J.t5'/T'40•t. 11.1+1 ~ , ~•~ ~ ~ ~ N-11 M_n --v-~ STOAY ~ ~ 1 .- N.lO'al't1•N. Da.SI / jRn~wru y L"', FEA~s.goY-t.- N.st•Ir4t•w. 4l.l1 ~ PP.Ep r;~ui+_+~I o ',j~ , ~ a-u s.al•so•orr< slsi ~; _: _• 1\rr,+• < <,.,_ ~ _• F I lrr[. J W t)til• II. e-•43'01•N. 11.11 ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~l •i4-t!'~ _ lafYTt1'YA ILa1.~. \ -....~ -M 2 IS-1c N.cr11•ea•la. u.1t ~~ ~ ~ u` s P- It-it e.11'L4Y!'T4 1S.lo truw a sa.. \ V ~ n prr.,,~~ut. ~~ Y ~ YI F.•r Tti.N N.SO•SI'11'W. 1!.!! • 1 aca.ar 6-uu• ` ~ .~ ~ ~t:uus:t. \ It-11 N.Ia'01'4!'W. 14.10 Ql ~ O -` t 0 14-t! t1.11.OYO!'E. ~e.ee ~ a o ~ 1-21 1J.lS•!S'4a•l.41.lt ~0•+" e.~ \ .'i ° M ta.tt G N. tt•!!'t!•t. t,.l1 i . .. a ~~ ~ n-~ N.n•tl•4t•w. a.a ~ ~ ~ 9 NOTG: l1utS FaOM CORNtlS d tJ~'~ 3 M2•e• 4TeS ARaNawuuis. T~^flce Prue SMOWWts ~•~ 1 Y1) P~~rLStvw .~f oRoFc?1'r H ~ +,vr •; ~ f,l. •,oen FAR •~ ~ t BVSIaJEjS PUR,PoSES w . ~ w ,• tats. e111R1NG DIl1IINCR . l~~~ %..« ~ e•C S.II•tS't!'E. 13.te .~.E ` o c• o s.ls•or:s•!. e4.oe 1 t p•E N.bt'IS'/t'W. Is.el i ~ R•F N.lt'IP40'W. fl.C! ~ 1~ Z ~ F•a N.It'IClt'W. 34.14 i~ ~ E•A N.30'!0'M. Sl.ll `~ It ' ~~ ~ ~ ~~ 0 ~ ~ ~ i j I ~~~. 1+/ .. .- .. +~ ,~ IN1s 9 1 NOTE: + ~ r ' + ~e. ~ AcCil1 TO TN! J•011 ACtalaAtT }r ~~ Te to taovleta Ovaa A t0'ROA• alw ~ ~ Celt.N+u6 TNa Ca4Ttsit+Ya Os TMa GaarEl ROAR IaAO+uC FaeM VA. NNY. RT, aal Ta s1Ti. i CAea -.MaAeoi LiwAN.LAlAOOa = RafiaV! NATlR R16Mfa TO Via ~ f StR+Na O+1 TNt 3.0,! AtalTtAaT• u a Y r, ~ ^,'+~~~, c~ T. R PARKER ` ~ ~olY 'tom w.N.raa 'lit V LAND /1URVET011 ~•~- 5 u. ~~ s • ~'•~_ °y 11lIAAIM140 Pea-aaTY Os ~ CERTIFICATE NQ .,~ ~ CAea l.MCl,aoa L fs0/1A N. M[AOee ~ 420 ArP DYED: a I•K,.,,.I,r~r cG *~, Pup poJt. SAS MtA~oR fFD LAID r'v• A T, ReAMaI,! COVNTY 1A44146 CaMM1~alON ATt SURVEY FOR CARL L. MEADOR &, EONA H. MEAOOR SHOWING A 0.0lG ACRE TRACT TO DE CONVEYED 70 O~<.6N ~. HARTMAN ANO A S.OT• ACRE TRACT TO Di C01JVt<Yi0 TO RICHARD ~• CARRELL 6• TAMARA M. CARLIIN. ' TNL fYfJtCT Ta01ttTT It NOT YtTN! eOUNDA1tTTA! tStAatISNtO aT T111~ ROANOKC COVyTY -LDUAL 1MSVtANCt AONINISTaAT10M. YIIIDINIA J R . ! lcAtl: i~ 1DO• N.s. oAte• eT: T. P. PARKER b SON !~~ ENGINEERS 1, SURVEYORS , L1D. DATE: ORC. t6 , tae = ONUIaTN R•C•W• cK'D. ~~~~~~~~ 21511 • IAAEM , VIRGINIA W.0.~113_ 0- s~.a•ntM HIwNM d toMrMy ~.y_.: - 3 - ~~~ ~ ~~ i.. {. 9a8- y 0 unQTu a° ~ ` o ~R o 6 " 38.96AefD) `~ :~"" 47.6zAcC) f9 zo.ic ~.~ 22.1 19.97 At ZS S4.66Ac 24 ' 30.92:Ac 0 26 /: IS.OOAc ~`\ j, 32 2.1 23.47 , ~ 924 , ~ 3OJ 33 16.62At (Dl 39.15 Ac (C) i ~\ 22 9.20Ae All properti A-1 unless c ~ -- ~ _ ~ v 26tiAc a.ooAc 2.16Ae t6.10 Ae 101 2L21Ae IC1 9.27ACtC1 qp 1-"• O ~ ~ 8 ~ 90 6Ac lp - 4 - ROANOKE COUNTY Richard & Tamara Carrell DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT Use Not Provided For Permit STAFF REPORT ~8 8 ~ y CASE NUMBER: 43-9/88 PETITIONER: RICHARD & TAMARA CARRELL REVIEWED BY: LIZ PARCELL DATE: SEPTEMBER 6, 1988 Petition of Richard and Tamara Carrell for a Use Not Provided For Permit to operate a dog boarding kennel and to conduct obedience training classes, in addition to a residence on a 3.079 acre tract located immediately east of the terminus of Old Virginia Springs Road (Route 667) in the Vinton Magisterial District. 1. NATURE OF REQUEST a. In April of 1988, the petitioners requested a Use Not Provided For permit to construct a maximum 15-run dog kennel with boarding and obedience training classes in an A-1 Agricultural District. The Planning Commission recommended approval and the Board of Supervisors denied the request on the basis that the training area was too close to neighboring residents. Since the April meetings, the petitioners have revised their plans, relocating the training area from an area near Old Virginia Springs Road to an area approximately 200 feet west. The Zoning Administrator made the determination that the request was different, allowing the request to be heard by the Planning Commission. List of proffers limits number of kennels to be built, hours of operation, size of classes, and ensures confinement of dogs on the property at all times. There is currently a private kennel on the property licensed for 20 dogs. Petitioner now has 8 dogs and 6 private runs. § 21-20 of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance defines a private kennel as allowing three or more dogs over six months old to be kept on the property as pets or f or pleasure, hunting, exhibiting, dog showing, or field and obedience trials; commercial gain is not the primary objective. This section also defines a commercial kennel as allowing the sale, rental, caring, breeding, grooming, keeping and boarding of dogs, cats, or other domestic animals for commercial purposes. Commercial purposes mean that the dogs or other domestic animals are primarily kept for a fee or other form of compensation. b. Attached concept plan and zoning vicinity map describe project more fully. 2. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS a. The A-1 Agricultural District permits a variety of animal- related activities and businesses, including the keeping of animals and fowl, dairying, riding academies, livestock markets, and private kennels. However, commercial kennels are not a permitted use in the A-1 District. The business of conducting dog obedience training classes is not listed as a permitted use in any district. The Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) lists dog kennels under "agricultural production-livestock." b. § 21-102-5 states that an application for a Use Not Provided For permit may be made to the County, "if, in any district, a use is not specifically permitted." - 5 - 988~y c. Site plan review will be required to ensure conformity with County regulations. d. VDOT entrance permit is required. 3. SITE CHARACTERISTICS a. Topography: Level area by the road, slopes steeply up to the driveway. Area around dwelling and kennel is level, then slopes steeply to the rear of the property. b. Ground Cover: Flat area by road is covered in overgrown briars and brush. Area around house and kennels is cleared and remaining borders are heavily wooded. 4. AREA CHARACTERISTICS a. Future Growth Priority: Situated within the Mt. Pleasant Commun- ity Planning Area. Designated for limited growth; does not currently have and is not intended to receive urban services. b. General area is rural, very low density residential, some farming, woodlands, and steep slopes. 5. LAND USE IMPACT ASSESSMENT Rating: Rate each factor according to the impact of the proposed action. Use a scale of 1 through 5. 1 = positive impact, 2 = negligible impact, 3 = manageable impact, 4 = disruptive impact, 5 = severe impact, and N/A = not applicable. RATING FACTOR COMMENTS LAND USE COMPATIBILITY 2 a. Comprehensive Plan: 1985 Comprehensive Development Plan has placed this area within a Rural Preserve Land Use category. The kennel is considered an agricultural business and the use is consistent with RP-6 (encourage new agricultural services). 2 b. Surrounding Land: Very low density residential, open fields and wooded areas with steep slopes, some farming. 2 c. Neighboring Area: Same as surrounding land. 3 d. Site Layout: Determined by existing dwelling, existing private kennels, and topography. Parking located in flat area adjacent to the road (two residential dwellings are directly opposite this area) and beside kennels. Training area relocated next to house. Kennels will be located behind the house and shielded from public view. Training and kennel areas will be fenced and dogs will be confined at all times to a fenced area or on a leash. N/A e. Architecture: 2 f. Screening and Landscape: Original proffer of pine border around parking area has been deleted. Training and kennel areas will be fenced. A privacy fence will be placed around the kennels. In addition, existing dwelling and heavy tree cover on remaining property borders will shield kennel area from surrounding views. - 5 - 98~~ .~ 2 g. Amenities: Parking area will be provided adjacent to the kennels and below the house for the training classes. 1 h. Natural Features: North, east, and south borders are heavily wooded; construction will not require clearing existing trees. Lower west end of property to be cleared of briars and maintained as a grass field. TRAFFIC 2 i. Street Capacities: Current ADT for Old Virginia Springs Road is 66. With an average of three classes per week and a maximum of 15 dogs per class, the estimated additional trip ends per week is 90. Additional trip ends not estimated for boarding facilities. 2 j. Circulation: Existing driveway to serve as access to/from parking areas. UTILITIES 2 k. Water: Private water (spring). 2 1. Sewer: Private septic. DRAINAGE 2 m. Basin: Back Creek Basin; property is bordered on west side by a spring branch. No drainage problems noted. 2 n. Flo°dflood~boundaryoasrestablished1bylthehFederals Insuranc0e yea Administration. PUBLIC SERVICES 4 0. Fire Protection: Outside established service standard. 4 p. Rescue: Outside established service standard. N/A q. Parks and Recreation: N/A r. School: TAX BASE 2 s. - Land and Improvement Value: N/A - Taxable Gross Sales/Year: $10,000 - Total Employees: 1 or 2 roximately $340 new - Total revenue to the County/Year: App revenue. ENVIRONMENT 2 t. Air: 3 u. Water: Water rights are reserved to the spring located on the property. Siting for waste disposal in relation to spring location must meet health department standards in order to avoid contamination of water supply. - 7 - 98a- ~ 2 v. soils: 3 w. Noise: A kennel silencer will be installed on the property to ensure quiet conditions. Location of kennels behind house and the heavily wooded borders should lessen impact of barking dogs during the day. 2 x. Sig nage: Petitioners have proffered one sign which will be wooden and not illuminated. 6. PLAN CONSISTENCY This area is designated as Rural Preserve. The kennel is an agricultural business and is consistent with the Land Use Plan map and defined policies, specifically RP-6 (encourages agricultural business). 7. STAFF EVALUATION a. Strengths: (1) Consistent with the Land Use Plan map and policies. (2) Location of kennels shields them from surrounding views. (3) Overgrown briar/brush area to be mowed and maintained as grass field, improving the appearance from the road and nearby houses. (4) Active area for obedience training classes has been relocated to help alleviate concerns of neighbors. b. Weaknesses: (1) Parking located adjacent to road and clearly visible from nearby residential dwellings. (2) Potential of a noise problem from barking dogs. - 8 - vZRC~INIA: BEE~tE THE BOARD OF SUPE~tVISORS OF ROIANOi~ COiJI~I'Y A 3.079 acre parcel of land, ) general oval ly t~ on Route 667 ) one mile from R~»tp 666 ) w within the Vinton - ). ~ Magisterial District, and ) ~ recorded as parcel ~ 99.00-1-33.1 ) in the Roanoke County Tax Records- ) `d~ H z w N 2 O U O H Q w 0 a a a FII~F,L ORDF~t TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF RQANORE COUNTY: 988 - y WHEREAS, your Petitioner Richard J. and Tamara M. Carrell did petition the Board of County Supervisors fora "Use Not Provided For" permit for the above-referenced parcel for the purpose of Residence and boardinct kennel of to fifteen dog runs days WHEREAS, after due legal notice, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing of the petition on September 6 , 19 88 , at which time, all parties in interest were given an opportunity to be heard; and WHEREAS, after full consideration, the Board of County Supervisors determined that the "Use Not Provided For" permit be approved on September 27, 1988 with proffer of conditions. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDERID that the aforementioned parcel of land, which is contained in the Roanoke County Tax Maps as Parcel 99.00-1-33.1 and recorded in Reek Book 1218 Page 113 and l~uY described below,. be issued a "Use Not Provided For" permit for the purpose of Residence and boarding kennel of up to fifteen dog tuns, obedience training classes in fenced area, limited hours and days. - 9 - 98~- y Legal Description of Property: BEGINNING in the center of the branch at Corner "1", on the east line of the Ollen B. Hartman 2 1/16 acre tract, said point being approximately 30 feet east of the centerline of Va. Hwy. Rt. No. 667 (30 feet wide); thence with four new lines thru the property of Carl L. Meador and Edna H. Meador, S. 47° 09' 04" E. 133.21 feet to an iron pin at Corner "2"; thence S. 81° 53' 43" E. 36.79 feet to an iron pin at Corner "3"; thence N. 78° 41'53" E. 509.66 feet to an iron pin at Corner "4"; thence S. 9~ 49' 48" E. 174.96 feet to an icon pin at Corner "5" cn the northwesterly line of the foanerly Hubert & Fdith Kelly property; thence with the same, following the existing fence, S. 54° 14' 03" W. 197.18 feet to a 30 inch red oak at Corner "6"; thence s. 67° 33' 18" W.-65.59 feet to a 10 inch hickory at Corner "7"; thence S. 74° 34'.43" W. 24.20 feet to a 24 inch red oak at Corner "8"; thence N. 77° 37' 41" W., passing a 36 inch white oak on line at 287.34 feet, in all 303.41 feet to Corner "9" in the centerline oaf a branch; thence dc~m in the branch as it meanders, the following 10 courses and distances, N. 25° 45' 40" E. 11.47 feet to Corner "10"; thence N. 30° 57' 21" W. 11.69 W. 38.51 feet to Corner "12"; thence S. 81° 50' 02" W. 33.57 feet to corner "13"; thence N. 81° 43' 09" W. 27.99 feet to Corner "14"; thence S. 60° 45' 25" W. 11.69 feet to Corner "15"; thence N. 62° 19' 06" W. 18.92 feet to Corner "16"; thence S. 79° 26' 45" W. 15.10 feet to Corner "17"; thence~N. 50° 51'.12" W. 19.39 feet to Corner "18"; thence N. 16° 09'43" W. 14.40 feet to Corner "19" on the easterly rightrof~way line of Va. Hwy. Rt. No. 667; thence with same, N. 17° 02' 03" E. 70.88 feet to Corner "20" in the centerline of the branch; thence leaving the rightrof-way of said highway and with the center of the branch, the following three courses and distances, N. 35° 35' 43" E. 41.38 feet to Corner "21"; thence N. 22° 39' 23" E. 27.91 feet to Corner "22"; thence N. 11° 21' 42" W. 25.29 feet to Corner "12", the place of BEGINNING and containing 3.079 acres, as shown on plat prepared by T. P. Parker & Son, Engineers and Surveyors, Ltd., dated December 26, 1984. BE IT FURTHER ORDERID that a copy of this order be transmitted to the Secretary of the Planning Ccmnission and that he be directed to reflect that change on the official zoning map of Roanoke County. Nickens and u n the ADOPTED on motion of Supervisor Po following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, McGraw, Nickens, Robers, Garrett NAYS. None ABSENT: None 7 ~Y~2iu~-J~'-~~-~ Deputy ~ perk cc: File Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Arnold Covey, Director, Development & Inspections Dale Castellow, Acting Director, Planning Jonathan Hartley, Acting Zoning Administrator John Wiley, Director, Real Estate Assessment - 10 - VIRGINIA: N ~--I rn H z w H z 0 U O H Q w 0 a a a BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY A 3.079 acre parcel of land, generally located on Route 667 one mile from Route 666 within the Vinton Magisterial District, and recorded as parcel # 99.00-1-33.1 in the Roanoke County Tax Records. PROFFER OF CONDITIONS TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY: ~~~ _,~(( Being in accord with Sec. 15.1-491.1 et seq. of the Code of Virginia and Sec. 21-1O5E of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance, the Petitioners Richard and Tamara Carrell hereby voluntarily proffer to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia the following conditions to the "Use Not Provided For" permit of the above-referenced parcel of land: A. Site Restrictions 1. No kennel will be construced withir: 150 feet of the property line, as of April 5, 1988, between our property and that of Bonnie McCutcheon. 2. No business usage of any sort will be within i~0 feet of the property line described in condition A1. 3. No kennel will be constructed within 200 feet of Route 667. - 11 - X88-~ B. IMPROVEMENTS 1. There will be no more than 15 kennels built for commercial purposes; with a total of not more than 27 dogs resident on the premises. 2. The kennel facility and Training Area will be fenced to ensure that no dogs may escape. 3. There will be one sign which will be wooden and non- illuminated. 4. A Kennel Silencer will be installed and maintained in the commercial kennel. 5. The parking area for the training classes will be at least 50 feet from Route 667. 6. The Training Area will be at least 200 feet from Route 667. 7. Parking for the kennel will be located behind the kennel at the top of hill. $, Pine trees to be planted and maintained on 7 ft. centers along Old Virginia S rin Road adjacent to parking areas. C. OPERATIONS 1. All dogs on this property for boarding or training purposes will be on a leash or confined by a secure fence. 2. There will be no more than 3 hours of group classes a day. 3, There will be no group classes on Sundays. 4. There will be no more than 15 dogs in group obedience classes. No training will occur after 9:00 p.m. 5. Dogs in the training area for exercislicant ortemployee 5 and will always be supervised by app of applicant. No dogs will be in the Training Area at any time unless for training or for exercise. When any dog is in the Training Area for training, no dogs shall present for exercise, and when any dog is in the Training Area for exercise, no dogs shall be present for training. Respectfully submitted, ~~ ,,, ~'l ~~ ,- ,~ Petitioners _- - 12 - . 988- y OF RQANOKE ~~ BEE'ORE THE ~~ OF ~pgtVISORS reel of land, ~ A _3,p79- acre pa generally located on Route 667 ) one mile fran Route 666 RDCTI~ ~~ the Vinton ~,gisterial District, and ) recorded as parcel ~ 99.00-1-33.1 ) in the Roanoke County Tax Records. ) Zi0 THE HONURABZ-E SUPE.°VISORS OF R(~,NOKE ~~' mpg, your petitioner Richard J • tition to request a to the Planning Commission a pe has filed with the Secretary reel of land for the "Use Not Provided For" permit for the above referenced pa purpose of Residence and boardin kennel -- ..,.~;,,;,,Q classes in fenced area, limited hours and days. Canrission which, after due `„i~Epg, the petition was referred to the Pla.niung notice as required by Section 15.1-431 of the Code of Virginia of~1950, as legal $~' amended, did hold a public hearing on S?Ptember 6 ~ 19 WHEREAS, at that public hearing all parties in interest were afforded an opportunity to be heard; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after. due consideration has recaRmended to isorS that the request be approved with conditions. the Board of County Superv mission recannends to the NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning be granted sors that the above-referenced parcel of land Board of County SupeNl a Use Not Provided For permit with conditions • R le Robinson and upon the The above action was adopted on motion of y following recorded vote: Robinson, Massey, Witt, Gordon, Winstead AYES: I~,YS: None None ABSE~ • Respectfully ~ tted, Plannin Commission Secretary, Roanoke County g L E G A L N O T I C E Roanoke County BoardrofySuperviso all interested evening session beginn.in rs will hold a Persons that the the Communit g at 7:00 Public hearing at their Y Room of the Roanoke Counto ATuesday, SEPTEMBER 27, 1988 in Brambleton Avenue, S,W, Y dministration Center AND RICHARD C ~ Roanoke, Virginia, on the ~ 3738 containing 3.OA7Rg ACRESeandslocated I~ Petition of TAMARA USE NOT PROVIDED FOR on a tract OLD VIRGINIA SPRINGS ROAD EDIATELY EAST OF THE TERMINUS OF District. (ROUTE 667) in the VINTON Magisterial Rezoning has been requested to OPERATE A DOG BO TO CONDUCT OBEDIENCE TRAINING CLASSES IN County Plannin ADDITION TO A ARDING KENNEL AND CONDITIONS. g Commission recommends APPROVAL WITH PRO~E~DNCE. The thereto ascwelloastae Zoning Ordinance of Roanoke Count and documents related to this re the petition y amendments Department of Plannin ~ site plan, and other quest may be examined in the office of. the County AdministrationgCentder~ning, located in Room 600 of the Roanoke Roanoke County will provide assistance to handica ed desiring to attend contact the Count public hearings. Such individuals areppe persons special provisions are lnecessarysforeattendaCes quested to ([703] 772-2018) if nce. Given under my hand this SEVENTH day of SEPTEM BER, 1988. - ~4l Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Please publish in the evenin of the Roanoke Times and Wor~deNewsoon: TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 13, 1988 TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 20, X988 ~ Direct the bill for Publication to: TIARA AND RICHARD CARRELL 5272 OLD VIRGINIA SPRINGS ROAD ROANOKE, VA. 24014 342-3915 Y r D R A F T L E G A L N O T I C E Notice is hereby given to all interested persons that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at their evening session beginning at 7:00 p.m. on Tuesday, Septev~nber 27 , 1988, in the Community Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, S.W., Roanoke, Virginia, on the petition of lamava o,-.d ~~r,h~rd (,a/ve.I~ requesting a Use not ~iov~ded hor Peryvl~t ~e~- of a tract containing 3.O'lq 4c•e.~ and located immec~ia~ely easy of •he. +e.yrhinks o~ Old ~~ra~~n«- Scr~nhs ~oAd Ro~~e ~(~7~ in the y;~}o„ Magisterial District. Rezoning has .been requested to o~ra+e. a doa boardi~g keh~~ a.V,d to cond. o}~ediehce, i~ainina classes in adcC~fi~sn -~v ~ yeside.-nc.~ . The County Planning Commission recommends auorova~ w~i~ o.~o~.w~lr,',fns _ A copy of the Zoning Ordinance of Roanoke County and amendments thereto as well as a copy of the petition, site plan, and other documents related to this request may be examined in the office of the Department of Planning and Zoning, located in Room 600 of the Roanoke County Administration Center. Roanoke County will provide assistance to handicapped persons desiring to attend public hearings. Such individuals are requested to contact the County office of Personnel Services ([703] 772-2018) if special provisions are necessary for attendance. Given under my hand this day of ~P~e..v~nbc/ 1988. Please publish in the evening edition of the .Roanoke ..Times and World News on: Tuesday, `jQp+ 13. I~iB$ Tuesday, SQ~~ Zo, I~tgT~ Direct the bill for Publication to: a y1n a v o.. ~" ~~ ~~I n c.,~c ~ Cc,~.nn~. ~ (e 52~ Z of ~ V~i.~.~.uv<.~ a .~~-~_~ o o,.wJ 1~.~ , V,~ z ~o i ~ 103- 34Z"3`11~ 98a -s PETITIONER: DANIEL R. DUFFY CASE N[~1BER: 42-9/88 Planning C~rvisors Hearing Date: September 27,11988 Board of Supe A. RD2UEST Petition of Daniel R. Duffy to rezo n b ~sinessc located on~thelweBts s de of B-2, Business to construct a dry clean g Brambleton Avenue (Rt. 221) approximately 1,000 feet north of its intersection with Colonial Avenue (Route 720) in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District. B. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION cleaners will In response to a citizen's inquiry, Mr. Duffy stated that the dry first operate as a drop off station and after it becomes self sufficient, dry cleaning will be done on the pr~nises. C. SIGNIFICANT IMPACT FAC'T'ORS 1. Signage: A billboard, 300 sq.ft. in size, is currently located imd~ m the south of this site on the Cave Spring Car Wash property. Traveling south, this billboard almost completely shields this site from motorists' view. D. PROFFERED CONDITIONS 1. To be constructed in substantial conformance with the concept plan. 2. Use of the property will be limited to a dry cleaning businese•will be no more 3. No billboards will be erected on the property. Total signag than 100 sq.ft. E. CODM4ISSIONER' S MOTION, VOTE A~ REASON roved the petition with proffered conditions. Mr. Gordon moved to app carried with the follcxaing Wott~cGordo teWinstead AYES: Robinson, Massey, NAYS: None ABSENT: None F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE None. G . ATTACf~iENTS The motion Concept Plan (8~" x 11") Vicinity Map (8~" x 11") Staff Report Other: ~~ Dale Castellow, Alternate Secretary Roanoke County Planning C~unission 98~-s -__ -~VOSl'_('11~-f1o~1'ry3 e ~~~. ~ s s ~ a _ ~ ~ r ~ S '~~r ~ .. n a 3 ~~ s o o ( ~ ~ ~ ~ , i ~z~ s ~~ zY3 ~ ~ ~ as yI a ,I ~`~~~ c a~8~'! F ~ ~`~° ~~5~~ I 9 z~ ~ s.~~a a g~» 0 ' I ° ~ ~ rmm 3a~c f' ~ dCe , ' I W e~ W ~ 8 ~ C ' l ~ ~ I ~ '°J=, s g~~~ / ~ I `gg_r J C `. s ~ ~ ~~ ~ /' _ _ z ~ Se ~~ b ~z~ O 9 'e a / 0 ~vo • ~ `' •}~{i :~~ b `t~ ~~ r / 1 \ ~ ~. 1 r ~$ \ , / ~~ c e ~~a ozroz .t ~~ m~ s ,_ ~ ~ ~_ ~ ~~ ~~ ~W a. ~ ~ J V w Q W e s~ .. c W '~ F ~ L ~~ I iEa_ _ ~~~ -~ D NnQru ,o s . ~ ~ '° ~ i ~ ~ ~~, ~/ ~ I ' 1 / 1 1 1 B1 / ~ 1 g. 3.13 Ac 101 1 3.89AcIC1 1 J 1 C 1 1 B1 36 2 B 2 s.nae 8 ,a / ~,,. B 3 g / a 62 O .v w ION ~ BZ19 / w :a B3 ~ / 1 b B1 S.t ~3 ~ p / IieA~ Is 61 ... ~ , ~~. B2 ~ 6 1 / z.oo,~ ~ V . ~ ~ ~ B1 Is f ` B \~y titi __-_ 1.J3k~-_ v BZC 4 .. C p _ B 2 ~ / M1C ' ~o~A< < 13 :~ J . _ ~~ v° /~:xa~ / i'~ i B 2 ~r?~ 7~ ~ f 1 !.1 yM `~ 3 ~ / f A II B' ~q e 1 '~ ~ All properties are zoned f ~' / R-1, unless otherwise noted. we 1 C ,~ - 3 - A ` ROANOKE COUNTY Daniel R. Duffy DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT B-1 to B-2C VICINITY MAP STAFF REPORT 9~C~ - „~ CASE NUMBER: 42-9/88 PETITIONER: Daniel R. Duffy DATE: September 6, 1988 REVIEWED BY: Dale Castellow Petition of Daniel R. Duffy to rezone a .343 acre tract from B-1, cleaning business Business to B-2, Business to construct a dry approxi- located on the west sideoffitsaintersectionuwithtColonial Avenue mately 1,000 feet north (Rt. 720) in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District. 1. NATURE OF REQUEST uest to construct a dry cleaning a. Conditional req establishment approximately 1,200 square feet in size. b, Attached concept plan and zoning vicinity map describe the project more fully. 2. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS General Commercial District permits a variety of a. The B-2, office and retail ubeen profferedaasoa conditioncofon o permitted uses has this petition. b, Site plan review will be required to ensure compliance with County regulations. c. A commercial entrance permit will be required from VDOT. 3. SITE CHARACTERISTICS a. Topography: Moderately sloping to towards the Cave Spring car wash family residence. b. lowugrowingrunderbrushaalongtthe 4. AREA CHARACTERISTICS a. Future Growth PriorArea, Community Planning b, General area is and residential 419 and US 221). the south and southwest and an abutting single hedge of mature trees and rear property line. Situated within the Windsor Hills designated for stable growth. developed with mixed commercial, office, uses along two major highways (Va Route 5, LAND USE IMPACT ASSESSMENT Ratings Rate each factor according to the impact of the proposed action. Us= negligibletimpact,53 manageable 1 positive impact, 2 = severe impact, and N/A = not impact, 4 = disruptive impact, 5 applicable. - 4 - 988--~ COMtgENTS RATING FACTOR LAND USE COMPATIBILITY 3 a. Comprehensive Plan: withinoapcorenland Dseecategoryplan has placed this area General retail and personal service businesses are encouraged within arCa4 dpetitioneras requestWishinhe exception of Policy conformance with the Future Land Uwhichapertainsdto applicable policies.. Policy C-4, coordinated site to svehiculareaccess pointsrtonpublic vehicles; minimizing has not been addressed. streets; and limiting signage; 3 b. Surrounding Land: Heavily traveled primary highway, existing reGtaurAnsincle familydresidence abutsathet grocery store. g property to the rear. 3 c. Neighboring Area: Major transportation corridors, commercial development, with single and multifamily residential uses. g d. Site Layout: Petistantialaconformitydwithtthevsubmitted will occur in sub lan denotes concept plan of July 28, 1988. The concept p one point of achamseredsbymthetfactvthat vehiclesoentering circulation is p and exiting the three parking spaces in front of the building will conflict with drive-through traffic. This problem is complicated by the fact that once improvements to Brambleton Avenue are complete, minimal stacking space for vehicles exiting the site will remain. g e. Architecture: No renderings or elevations submitted. 3 f, Screening and Landscaping: Despite the fact that the property situated immediately beutilizedsas singleifamily zoned B-1, the lot is currently residential (portion f~intisomensareening andibufferings zoned R-1). Consequen y, will be required. raehicllimitationaoflthistsitebemosteof the size and topog p the existing vegetationdatenthehemployeerparkinglfacility. be destroyed to accommo 2 g. Amenities: Proffered concept plan includes adequate parking facilities. Ordinance requires 6 spaces. wall 3 h. Natural features: Pealongntheanorthernhedge ofttheisite will be constructed and that the existing grade will be raised to accommodate the proposed parking facility. - 5 - 988-s TRAFFIC acities: Using ITE trip generation estimates for 3 i. Street Cap drive- similar drive-through servicestafflestimatesgthat this through banking facilities), establishment will generate approximately 160 vehicle trips per day. This figure is based on vehicle trips per service employee rather than estimates based on commercial square footage. ADT on Brambleton Avenue was approximately 12,910 In 1986, vehicles. Since this count was completed, at least wo additional developrambletonoAvenueaVeAseanresultvof these this vicinity of B developments, as well as other developments in the periphery of the US 221 corridor, traffic volumes along this section of BraunderwayAtonimprovelBrambleton Avenuen tially. Plans are from Electric Road (Rt. 419) to Crystal Creek Drive (Rt. 897). These plans call for widening Brambleton Avenue from 2 to 4 trCeerequirementslwillpbeebasedbonkthe and commercial entran revised right-of-way requirements. Three accidents occurred onLane2andbColonialtAvenuersec- tions with Old Cave Spring 1987 and February These accidents occurred between January 1988. 3 j. Circulation: Access is limited from Brambleton Avenue. Petitioner-proposeswindownduAlthoughointerionc~irculaness at a drive through _ tian is adequate n° walkeinhservice mayocreateesomeon, customers require g interior circ~esslfromrtheeparkinghspacesealongothelfront ingress or eg of the building. Future widening of US 221 will compl - cate this probleorbvehiclesnenteringoand exitingltheesite. stacking space f UTILITIES 2 k. Water: Adequate supply and distribution. 2 1. Sewer: Adequate. DRAINAGE 2 m. Basin: No known problems. N/A n. Floodplain: PUBLIC SERVICES 2 0. Fire Protection: Within established service standard. - 6 - L/ CJ °" ,,.~.~ 2 p. Rescue: Within established service standard. N/A q. Parks and Recreation: N/A r. School: TAX BASE 1 s, - Land and Improvement Value: $14500000 - Taxable Gross Sales/Year: $ - Total Employees: 2 2 110 - Total revenue to the County/Year: ANEW°REVENUEy $1,420 ENVIRONMENT 2 t. Air: 2 u• Water: 2 v. Soils: 2 w. Noise: 300 square feet in size, is currently. 4 x. signage: A billboard, located immediately south of this site on the Cave Spring Car Wash property. Traveling from the south, this billboard almost completely shields this site from motorist's view. Petitioner has not pronfthis sitelimBasedoonoroadefrontage, of signage permitted approximately 210 squareefeetitionernprofferlconditionsed. Staff recommends that th P restricting the amount of permitted signage to 65 square feet. 6. PLRN CONSISTENCY This area is designated Consistent withFtherlandnusesplanamap Petitioner's request is and applicable policiessitettotsitexmovementoforopedestrians Policy C-4 pertains to and vehicles, shared access and limited signage. 7. STAFF EVALUATION a, Strengths: (1) Request thecexception oftPolicyFCt4re Land Use Plan map and, with applicable policies•~s(taxpbasesal will have a positive impact on the County b. Weaknesses: (1) Interior circulation is hampered because of the size of the site. (2) Petitioner has not proffered conditions prohibitinghastnot profferednconditionsrlimiting uses. (3) Petitioner the amount of signassitateeanotherdaccessedrive.onto) Proposal would nece Brambleton Avenue. - 7 - 9~'8-- .~ ested Proffers: (1) Staff recommends that the c. Sugg inappropriate uses from the petitioner restrict potentially enerating site. It is highstrafficopolumestmay notsbe appropriate particular y for this site. For example, fast food estanlo~sbeen s, banking facilities, high volume retail may appropriate uses for this site. Also~andrhotelforlmotels such as restaurno~sbecappropriatelfor this parcel. operations may roffer conditions {2) Staff recommends that termpt,tedisignage to 65 square restricting the amount of p feet. - 8 - 988-5 VIRGINIAS BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUN'T'Y p, .343 acre parcel of land, ~ generally located Bramb leton Ave. ) 00 Windsor Hills ) ~~' ORDER ~ within the ~ Magisterial District, and ) ~ recorded as parcel # 76.20-02-06 ) in the Roanoke County Tax Records. ) •• TO THE HON~2ABLE SUPERVISORS OF RQANORE COUL~Ti'Y S H 2 W o WHEREAS, your Petitioner Daniel R. Duffy v did petition the Board of County Supervisors to rezone the above-referenced parcel District to B-2, Business District E' f rom B-1, Business ~ for the purpose of constructing a dry cleaning business 0 W o lic w WHEREAS, after due legal notice, the Planning Commission did hold a pub a' September 6 , 19 88 , at which time, all parties '~ hearing of the petition on in interest were given an opportunity to be heard; and September 27 WHEREAS, after full consideration at the public hearing held on 1g 88, the Board of County Supervisors deternnined that the rezoning be approved with proffer of conditions. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDERED that the aforementioned Or6ce1 of a~' ~ orded contained in the Roanoke County Tax Maps as Parcel 76.20 0 1244 page 1477~d legally described below, be rezoned from in Reek Book B-2, Business District. B-1, Business District to - 9 - Legal Description of Property: 9.0 G~ ~- BEGINNING at an iron on the westerly side of U.S. Route 221, approximately 488.5 feet northerly of its intersection with Old Cave Spring Road; thence N. 53° 31' 20" W. 32.22 feet to an iron; thence S. 87° 04' 20" W. 26.52 feet to an iron; thence N. 80° 18' 20" W. 75.56 feet to an iron; thence S. 79° 59' 25" W. 44.97 feet to an iron; thence N. 33° 30' 39" E. 103.53 feet to an iron rebar; thence N. 86° 02' 35" E. 100.00 feet to an existing P.K. Nail; thence S. 29° 33' 37" E. 26.64 feet to an iron; thence S. 59° 41' 38" E. 56.37 feet to an iron on the westerly side of U.S. Route 221; thence along the westerly side of U.S. Route 221, S. 36° 29' 00" W., passing an iron at 53.52 feet, a total of 80 feet to an iron, the place of BEGINNING and being New Tract C, containing 0.343 acre, a5 shown on survey for James Buck Plumbinc & Heating & R. William Reid Builder, Inc., by Balzer and Associates, Inc. Gand Surveyors, originally dated August 27, 1986 and updated March 25, 1988, to which survey more particular reference is hereby made. BEING a part of the same property conveyed to James Buck Plumbing & Heating and R. William Reid Builder, Inc. by deed of correction, dated August 28, 1986, recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court for the County of Roanoke, Virginia in Deed Book 1244, page 1477. BE IT FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this order be transmitted to the Secretary of the Planning Commission and that he be directed to reflect that change on the official zoning map of Roanoke County. ADOPTED on motion of Supervisor Garrett and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, McGraw, Nickens, Robers, Garrett NAYS. None ABSENT: None ~~~'~ ~~ ~~~-~ Deputy ~ Clerk cc• File Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Arnold Covey, Director, Development & Inspections Dale Castellow, Acting Director, Plannins~ Jonathan Hartley, Acting Zoning Administrator John Wiley, Director, Real Esta~ Assessment BEE~ORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY A . 3 4 3 acne parcel of land, ) generally located o n Route 2 21 ) PROFFER Within the Windsor Hills OF o Magisterial District, and ) CONDITIONS ~ recorded as parcel # 76.20-02-06 ) rn ) in the Roanoke County Tax Records. ) ~ THE I~ONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF RQANOKE COUNTY: H w Being in accord with Sec. 15.1-491.1 et seq. of the Code of Virginia and Sec. 0 21-1O5E _ of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance, the Petitioner D a n i e 1 R . Duff y ~ hereby voluntarily proffers to the ~ Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia the following conditions to the ~ ,rezoning of the above-referenced parcel of land: Q L~1 To be constructed in substantial conformance with the Conceptual Plan. That the property will be used for a dry cleaning establishment only. The total square footage of all signs on the subject property is ~' limited to a maximum of 100 square feet. No billboards will be erected on the property,. 9g,~'-~- VIRGINIA. BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COCTN7.'Y p, . 3 4 3 acre parcel of land, ) generally located B r amb T e t o n Ave .) within the Windsor Hills ) RECONMEN!]ATION Magisterial District, and ) recorded as parcel # 76.20-02-06 ) in the Roanoke County Tax Records. ) Tp THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COtJ[aPY: Daniel R. Duffy WHEREAS, your Petitioner has filed with the Secretary to the Planning Cot~nission a petition to rezone the above-referenced parcel of land fran B-1, Business District to B-2, Business District for the purpose of constructing a dr cleanin business WHEREAS, the petition was referred to the Planning Commission which, after due legal notice as required by Section 15.1-431 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended, did hold a public hearing on September 6, , 19 88 ; and WHEREAS, at that public hearing all parties in interest were afforded an opportunity to be heard; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due consideration has recam~nded to the Board of County Supervisors that the rezoning be approved with proffered conditions NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Co[mtission reca:mends to the Board of County Supervisors that the above-referenced parcel of land be rezoned to B-2, Business with proffered conditions The above action was adopted on motion of Mike Gordon and upon the following recorded vote: _ AYES: Robinson, Massey, Witt, Gordon, Winstead ~yg; None ~~; None Respectfu y submitted, ~/~' Alternate Secretary Roanoke County Planning Commiss L E G A L N O T I C E Notice is hereby given to all interested persons that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at their evening session beginning at 7:00 p.m. on Tuesday, SEPTEMBER 27, 1988, in the Community Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, S.W., Roanoke, Virginia, on the petition of DANIEL R. DUFFY requesting rezoning from B-1 BUSINESS to B-2 BUSINESS of a tract containing .343 ACRE and located ON THE WEST SIDE OF BRAMBLETON AVENUE (ROUTE 221) APPROXIMATELY 1,000 FEET NORTH OF ITS INTERSECTION WITH COLONIAL AVENUE (ROUTE 720) in the WINDSOR HILLS Magisterial District. Rezoning has been requested to CONSTRUCT A DRY CLEANING ESTABLISHMENT. The County Planning Commission recommends APPROVAL WITH PROFFERED CONDITIONS. A copy of the Zoning Ordinance of Roanoke County and amendments thereto as well as a copy of the petition, site plan, and other documents related to this request may be examined in the office of the Department of Planning and Zoning, located in Room 600 of the Roanoke County Administration Center. Roanoke County will provide assistance to handicapped persons desiring to attend public hearings. Such individuals are requested to contact the County office of Personnel Services ([703] 772-2018) if special provisions are necessary for attendance. Given under my hand this SEVENTH day of SEPTEMBER, 1988. Mary H. A len, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Please publish in the evening edition of the Roanoke Times and World News on: TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 13, 1988 TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 20, 1988 Direct the bill for Publication to: DANIEL R. DUFFY 6938 SHAVER ROAD S.W. ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018 342-7603 D R A F T L E G A L N O T I C E Notice is hereby given to all interested persons that the Roanoke County Board of Super.visc.rs will hold a public hearing at their S~p-~C ~. bey 2'7 evening session beginning at 7:00 p.m. on Tuesday, _~_ 1988, in the Community Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, S.W., Roanoke, Virginia, on the petition of ~a~ ~e C ~• `~~ F,F requesting 3 - 2 T~c,~s~~nJeSS rezoning from l~- ~ ~uSi~less to of a tract containing - 3~~ ~-~-reS and located onl e ~clesf ~~e o~ 3raw.6lC ~on1 ~-/e~lcce ~~~ Z2/~ Q~,~~o~GMa.~e/H /, ~o ~ef N /~ ~ ` s 'nlferS ivy in the ~i~lo~so/ ~~ !~S Magisterial District. kJrt~ C'°~DN`a J~Rezoril~ has been requested to GOnlsfr~cf a dry e~eayi~ g e5~~`~S~M~f' The County Planning Commission recommends app(sJ~l ~J~7G• l~/o /ec( Cow%~onls A copy of the Zoning Ordinance of Roanoke County and amendments thereto as well as a copy of the petition, site plan, and other documents related to this request may be examined in the office of the Department of Planning and Zoning, located in Room 600 of the Roanoke County Administration Center. Roanoke County will provide assistance to handicapped persons desiring to attend public hearings. Such individuals are requested to contact the County office of Personnel Services ([703] 772-2018) if special provisions are necessary for attendance. Given under my hand this ~ day of ~ ~eM-her 1988. Please publish in the evening edition of_ the Roanoke Times and World News on: Tuesday, F~ Tuesday, S2,Q~~at6er 2O l~'S8 Direct the bill for Publication to: `~N,~~ ,2 ~.~FF~ q 3 8 Shale ~ ~o~ , s ~• " ~Nv~~"-~ V'-~gi~1~GL 2~e18 3`~2- T6d3 9~~ - ~ OF THE ROANOKE ~~ PLANNING CODM~IISSION PETITIONER: 45-9Y CASE N[&iBER= Planning Co~nission Hearing Date: September 6, 1988 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: September 27, 1988 A . R~UEST Petition of the Secretary of the Roanoke County Planning Cccrec-ission to amend the Land Use Plan: Future Land Use map designatio nt ~~ ~°ion ofPUS 460 andlCloverdale of a tract of land located north of the Road (Route 604), east of Kingsmen Road (Roe HollOns Mag sterial District~.rder of the counties of Roanoke and Botetourt in th B. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION No one in opposition was present at the Planning Commission Public Hearing. C. SIGNIFICANT IMPACT FACTORS 1. None. D, PROFFERED CONDITIONS 1. Not Applicable. N E. COMMISSIONER'S MOTION, VOTE AND ~'~ rove the amendment to the Land Use Plan map. The motion Mr. Massey moved to app carried with the follawiing roll call vote: AYES; Robinson, Massey, Witt, Gordon, Winstead NAYS: None ABSENT; None F. DISSENTING PERSPDCTIVE None. G. ATTACHMENTS Concept Plan (8~~~ x 11") Vicinity Map (8~ Staff Report Other: Memo ~~~ Dale Castellow, Alternate Secretary Roanoke County Planning Commission 98~-~: NORTH 1,1 r 1 .~ ..~ . n e R E :.•~ ~ :~K ~ 1 / RE T / ~~q E6 A~ a / t... ~ ~~ ~~~ .` ~ / v ,....» COMMUNITY SERVICES & pEVELOPMENT Roanoke County Board of Supervisors R-E bo M-1 X88- ~ M E M O R A N D U M T0: Roanoke County Planning Commission FROM: Jon Hartley DATE: August 31, 1988 RE: Land Use Map Amendment Request Please find attached a petition to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors from the Secretary of the Planning Commission requesting an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map. The rezoning request from submBtathisfrequestisors for Tweeds, Inc. prompted the staff to The request is to amend ersectionnof1US Route24608andrCloverdale Road located north of the int ( Route 604 ), east of Kingsmen Road ( Route 608 ) from Core to Principle Industrial. The reasons for the amendment include the following: 1, At the time of the preparation of the Land Use Plan, the property owners, Roanoke Valley Development Corporation, had anticipated this area for an offics nowkbeingwmarketedfand developeddfor a Core area. The site 1 light industrial uses. 2. The larger portion of the Development CorporatiThislsite istotal of 70 acres } is located in Botetourt County. designated for Industrial Use 1Novembertel987t CAmendingtthe land Use Guide which was adopted in use category to Principal Industrial would improve consistency with Botetourt's Land Use Guide. The properties surrounding ation2or7Corere TheePrincipalgIndustrial either Neighborhood Conserv land use category basisethatpmeasuresicantbestakenotoiminimize any categories on the adverse impacts from industrial uses. In considering this am in ale lndustrialaareasaandtfoundethenproposed determinants for Princ p amendment to be consistent with these determinants. These lan use determinants include: 1, Existing Zoning - locations where industrial zoning has already been established. 2. Potential Industrial Sites - locations identified by the Roanoke County industrial sites inventory. - locations where land is generally flat or gently 3. Topography sloping (less than 10°s slope). - 3 - 988-~ 4. Flood Hazard Prevention - locations outside of the floodplain. 5, Water Supply - locations where capacity is sufficient or where future improvement to capacity is proposed. 6. Sewer Service - locations served by public sewer or where extension of service is proposed. 7. Access - locationslmcrovementsbareufeasible,public street capacity or where p g, Urban Sector - locations within the projected urban service area. Your review and recommendation of this land use map amendment is appreciated. - 4 - FINAL ORDER ~88-Co September 27, WHER~S, after full consideration at the pubes thatrthe h~ndm~nt to the Future 19 88 ~ the Board of County Supervisors determi approved Land Use Guide of the Roanoke County Ccmprehensive Development Plan be rcel o4010a1nd, 18hich is ~~ THEREFORE, BE IT ORDERID that the aforementioned pa °0 fined in the Roanoke County Tax Maps as parcel 40.01-1-17 & and recorded ~ conta 627 and legally described below, be redesignated 1033 page N in Deed Book a e 707 ~ Principal Industrial '~ and Deed Book g ~ f radn Legal Description of Property: Route 604, All properties incorporated within the boundaries of Route 460, •• Route 608, and the Roanoke County, Botetourt County line in the H W Hollins Magisterial District. H 2 O U O H Q W P O a a a cc: File Development & Inspections Arnold Covey, Director, Dale Castellow, Acting Director, Planning Jonathan Hartley, Acting Zoning Administrator John Wiley, Director, Real Estate Assessment BE IT FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this order be transmitted to the Secretary the Planning Commission and that the Land Use Plan: Future Land Use Map be of changed accordingly. and upon the ADOPTED on motion of Supervisor Johnson following recorded vote: Garrett py~; Supervisors Johnson, McGraw, Nickens, Robers, NP'YS: None ABSENT: None _ 5 - y~G~-~ ~ C~ZLLey~ Deputy , Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors " ~pN~l'P OF THE RQANOKE COUNTY LAND USE PLAN ~~~.~ Before the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County: north of the intersection of 1°ai approx. 25 acre parcel of land, generally located Hollins routes 604 and 460 and east of the inter- within the iri the ect'on.ofl~outtes E~08a~dre0~4rt~~tas parC e#~s~t~Ol~~el_17 &40.01-1-18 Nlsagis~eria is ric , Roanoke County Tax Records. PETITION To the Honorable Supervisors of Roanoke County: Planning Commission ,5, your Petitioner the Secretary of the Roanoke County respectfully files this petition in accordance with the Code of VA of 1950, as amended and would respectfully show the following: core in the Future 1,The property is designated Land Use Guide of the Roanoke County Comprehensive Development Plan. 2.Your Petitioner now desires to redesignate this property as Principal Industrial Respectfully submit Petitioner R~COMNtENDATION WHEREAS, the petitioner was referred to the Planning Coommiir oinia of 1950, proper legal notice required by Section 15.1-431 of the Coa988 g Whereas all September 6, as amended, held a public hearing on - interested persons were afforded an opportunity to be h t the above referenced Commission recommends to the County BoardCoofeSupervisors tha to parcel of land be redesignated fran_ Principal Industrial in the Future Land Use Guide of the Roanoke County C~nprehensive Development Plan on the following recorded vote: Motion of Ron Massey Witt, Gordon, Winstead AYES: Robinson, Massey, NAYS: None ABSENT: None spectf y submitted, Secretary, Roanoke County Planning Commission - 6 - L E G A L N O T I C E Notice is hereby given to all interested persons that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at their. evening session beginning at 7:00 p.m. on Tuesday, SEPTEMBER 27, 1988 in the Community Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, S.W., Roanoke, Virginia, on the petition of SECRETARY OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION requesting TO AMEND THE LAND USE PLAN FROM CORE TO PRINCIPAL INDUSTRIAL of a tract containing 25 acres and located NORTH OF THE INTERSECTION OF U. S. ROUTE 460 AND CLOVERDALE ROAD (ROUTE 604) EAST OF KINGSMEN ROAD (ROUTE 608) in the HOLLINS Magisterial District. The County Planning Commission recommends APPROVAL. A copy of the Zoning Ordinance of Roanoke County and amendments thereto as well as a copy of the petition, site plan, and other documents related to this request may be examined in the office of the Department of Planning and Zoning, located in Room 600 of the Roanoke County Administration Center. Roanoke County will provide assistance to handicapped persons desiring to attend public hearings. Such individuals are requested to contact the County office of Personnel Services ([703] 772-2018) if special provisions are necessary for attendance. Given under my hand this SEVENTH day of SEPTEMBER, 1988. Mary H. llen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Please publish in the evening edition of the Roanoke Times and World News on: TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 13, 1988 TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 20, 1988 Direct the bill for Publication to: ROANOKE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING P. 0. BOX 29800 ROANOKE, VA. 24018 ~ ~~ ~ `~ ~~ . ,~. ~ .~ x~~ I <~ ~ ~ D R A F T L E G A L N O T I C E ~• Notice is hereby given to all interested persons that the ~ Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at their Roanoke County ~,~~:~~, ~; ~.~- a ~' inning at 7:00 p.m. on Tuesday, evening session beg 1988, in the Community Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, S.W., Roanoke, Virginia, on the petit requesting ,n • s ~t~r+c~k ~' f~ fia ct,mer ~~ • f r om~ tc~ (,,,,,,, _ to ~r 1 n ~ + ;-~ ~q ~- and of a tract containing o2.~ ~~~ - located 0 ~ Magisterial District. (~(,1.5fi B~ ~:trW~m~r~.~ca ~ ~~) the __~}c_'~ ny c~ ~ be d - ~°_ ---_------- - _--__ --- _ _ _. The County Planning Commission recommends CL ia~' ~ A copy of the Zoning Ordinance of Roanoke Counandaoaherendments thereto as well as a copy of the petition, site plan, documents related to this request may be examined in the office of the De artment of Planning and Zoning, located in Room 600 of the Roanoke p County Administration Center. rovide assistance to handicapped persons Roanoke County will p desiring to attend public hearings. Such individuals a772r2p18)ted to contact the County office of Personnel Services ([703] special provisions are necessary for attendance. ~_ da of a 1988. Given under my hand this y Please publish in the evening edition of the Roanoke Times and World News on: Tue sda ~ , ~~Df~"In ~~"I' .~ (~ , / 9~~ uirect the bill for Publication to: ~~ ~A~ ~9kDd ~~~~' ~- ~ PETITIONER: RQANOKE CpUrTry BOARD OF SUPERVISORS CASE NIA~4BER: 44-9/88 Planning Ccmmission Hearing Date: September 6, 1988 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: September 27, 1988 A. RD~UEST Petition of Roanoke County Board of Supervisors to rezone a portion of a 24.78 acre tract from RE, Residential Estates to A~1, Industrial for a buffer yard and construction of a mail order distribution center, located immediately east of Cloverdale Road (Route 604) and Kingsmen Road (Route 608) in the Hollins Magisterial District. B. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION Howard Poage, Shirley Wood, C. H. Hall, Mr. Dickenson, and Connie Watkins expressed their concerns: future use of the center should Tweeds leave; the hours of operation; the amount of truck traffic; the effect on properties in Botetourt County. C. SIGNIFICANT IMPACT FACTORS 1. None. D. PROFFERED CONDITIONS 1. Screening and buffering, type E, option 2. 2. Route 608 will not be used for industrial access. 3. An earthern berm will be provided to screen the loading dock area. E. COMMISSIONER'S MOTION, WTE AND REASON Mr. Massey moved the approve the petition with proffered conditions. The motions carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Robinson, Massey, Witt, Gordon, Winstead NAYS: None ABSENT: None F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE None. G. ATTACHMENTS Concept Plan (8~" x 11") Vicinity Map (8~" x 11") Staff Report Other : w ~ n Dale Castellaw, Alternate Secretary Roanoke County Planning Cam¢nission 1 '~ ~ ~ __> W {, ~~ ~~~, _ ~- ;x f -,_, g:~' ~ I 988- ~ ~ « Z Z 5 d ;; `'` ` m "~ i ~ ~ I 1 `` ~~ ~ i j I I `~ ~ ~ I I I I I I z 3 ~ I . I I `,~ 3' 11 I `~`~1 q I ~ I I ~ I I r i ~ ~ ~\ " ~ v I -q 1 I ~ ~" I 1 Iml \\ t ~ i i I4%I I ~`Y, 9 ~ ~ i i .\ ~ j Ilf'I I I i `\ ~ I I ~ I 1 t; I .\ I , I I I~ I ~ I I I 'I 131 I 1 I I I I I . I I I I 1 i ~~ ` I 1 rz ~ ~ ~~ I~~ I I i ~~ M1 ~ ,~i. •.e~.~e.. ~ ------ -------- an iw - b~ ~x .. - 2 w° W F- ~~ m JZ QQ 1- x ~ Z ~ O Z~ Yo UN Q F fn Z O~ m I W W~ 0 L ~ WQ J ~ m ~ u 0 V Z to W H Q ~~ N-: N ; Q I 2' W , O: Q; W Q Q Q_ :00 ~ .,~~. s.n,n {;~N \` a~G'~ Link -- ,~.. ---- - -- - - ~\~•'t --- `,\ `~ ~ •Q~~ \ \ , ~~ \ \ t ~~~ / BON CK s , . ( ~~ i - '~~~ VICINITY MAP ~ _ .~*' . .. ~` NORTH t c ~~~ I ~y RED w:,.~.e w z i.ooxta ~,,.~ cp.ry / r RE ~ • g~ too ~c ~ K RE ~ RE ~ I u t.o3 nc z.ooK a -s R E ~.o9k «.~ R=~ ~ RE ~ X03 k e RE 2.23At RE ~ p S i~~) R \.. ~ RE 4 9~ J \~ ~r M1 n 2448 ~ ,Q~ D~ Q~ ~/ - r K~,000 COMMUNITY SERVICES Roanoke County Board of Supervisors & DEVELOPMENT R-E bo M-1 988- ~ STAFF REPORT CASE NUriBER: 44-9/88 PETITIONER: Roanoke County Board of Supervisors REVIEWED BY: Jon Hartley DATE: September 2, 1988 Petition of Roanoke County Board of Supervisors to rezone a portion of a 24.78 acre tract from RE, Residential Estates to M-1, Industrial for a buffer yard and construction of a mail order distribution center, located immediately east of Cloverdale Road (Route 604) and Kingsmen Road ( Route 608) in the Hollins Magisterial District. 1. NATURE OF REQUEST a. Petitioner is requesting that a strip of land approximately 100' by 1400', adjacent to Kingsmen Road ( Route 608 ) be rezoned from RE, Residential Estates to M-1, Light Manufacturing. The remaining portion of the 24.78 acres was rezoned from RE tc, M-1 in January 1976. At that time, the Planning Commission recommended that the 100' strip remain zoned RE to serve as a buffer between the industrial site and residences on the west side of Kingsmen Road. The parcel is now the proposed site for the Tweeds, Inc. catalog fulfillment center which has resulted from a joint economic development venture of Roanoke and Botetourt Counties. In order to utilize the available acreage, the most recent plans call for an apron for the loading area and an access road to the rear of the property to be located parallel to and within 50 feet of Kingsmen Road right-of-way. These plans necessitate the rezoning of the RE strip. b. Attached concept plan (not finalized) and zoning vicinity map describes petitioner's request more fully. 2. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS a. The screening and buffering standards require an 8 foot fence and 35 foot landscaped buffer yard or a 50 foot landscaped buffer yard between M-1 and RE properties. Under the present zoning this would require a landscaped buffer yard of as much as 150 feet (the existing 100' RE strip plus the 50' required by ordinance). The screening and buffering requirements were established in 1985, and were not in effect when the 100' RE buffer strip was established. Petitioner has proffered, as a condition, provision of the 50 foot landscaped buffer strip. b. Site plan review and approval will be required to insure compliance with County development standards and in particular with the screening and buffering requirements. 3. SITE CHARACTERISTICS a. Topography: Property is gently rolling and is 5 to 10 feet above the grade of Kingsmen Road. b. Ground Cover: Ground cover consists of active and inactive agriculture. - 4 - 4. AREA CHARACTERISTICS a. Future Growth Priority: Situated within the Bonsack Community Planning Area. The growth initiative for this area is to stimulate growth. b. General area is a mixture of residential, institutional agricultural uses and open space. 5. LAND USE IMPACT ASSESSMENT Rating: Rate each factor according to the impact of the proposed action. Use a scale of 1 through 5. 1 = positive impact, 2 = negligible impact, 3 = manageable impact, 4 = disruptive impact, 5 = severe impact, and N/A = not applicable. RATING FACTOR COMMENTS LAND USE COMPATIBILITY 2 a. Comprehensive Plan: 1985 Comprehensive Develop:~~ent Plan has placed this area within the Core land use category. A staff initiated land use plan amendment is being processed simultaneously with this petition to change the future land use map for the entire 24.78 acres to the Principal Industrial category. This will bring the map into conformance with the existing zoning for the balance of the parcel. Should this map amendment be approved, this request would be consistent with both the map and policies contained within the land use plan. An exception to this is Policy I-9, prohibit industrial development adjacent to residential uses unless exceptional design measures are applied to achieve compatibility. 2 b. Surrounding Land: The surrounding area is comprised of a mixture of residential, institutional and agricultural uses. 3 c. Neighboring Area: The neighboring area consists of residential institutional and agricultural uses. 3 d. Site Layout: According to the most recent site plans, the loading dock and apron, access road to the loading area, and employee parking would be located adjacent to Kingsmen Road. No access from Kingsmen Road is contemplated. Other aspects of the site layout are not pertinent to this petition. N/A e. Architecture: 3 f. Screening and Landscaping: See discussion under applicable regulations above. 3 g. Amenities: See discussion under noise below. 2 h. Natural Amenities: TRAFFIC 2 i. Street Capacities: 2 j. Circulation: - 5 - 98~ - ~ UTILITIES 2 k. Water: 2 1. Sewer: DRAINAGE 2 m. Basin: Located in the Glade Creek drainage basin. N/A n. Floodplain: PUBLIC SERVICES 2 0. Fire Protection: 2 p. Rescue: N/A q. Parks and Recreation: N/A r. Schools: TAX BASE 1 s. - Land and Improvement Value: $ 2.356 million (Total Project) - Taxable Gross Sales/Year: $120 million by 1990 (Total Project) - Total Employees: 280 (Total Project) - Total Revenue to the County/Year: Approximately ENVIRONMENT 2 t. Air: 2 u. Water: 2 V. SOl1S: 3 w. Noise: Should the 100 foot RE strip be eliminated in favor of the 50 foot landscaped buffer strip required by the ordinance, increased noise from the loading dock area and associated truck traffic can be expected. Depending upon the final grading of the site, this noise could be mitigated by increased tree plantings or the the construction of a fence or earth berm in the buffer strip adjacent to the loading area. If properly designed, such measures would also mitigate the effect of truck lights on nearby residential properties. N/A x. Signage: 6. PLAN CONSISTENCY This area is currently designated as Core. A staff initiated land use map amendment is being processed simultaneously to change the land use category to Principal Industrial for the entire 24.78 acre parcel. If this amendment is approved this petition would be consistent with the land use plan map and policies. - 6 - y88- 7 7. STAFF EVALUATION a. Strengths: (1) Total project will enhance the local tax base. (2) Supportive of a joint economic development venture between Roanoke and Botetourt Counties. (3) Required 50' landscaped buffer strip can provide equal or greater screening and buffering for residents than the 100' unimproved buffer contemplated in 1976. b. Weaknesses: (1) Increased noise and light from the loading dock area can be anticipated, although this can be mitigated through additional plantings, a fence or an earthen berm. c. Proffers Suggested: (1) Additional tree plantings, a fence or an earthen berm should be constructed in the buffer yard adjacent to the loading area with sufficient height and density to reduce noise and to obstruct the glare of truck lights using the loading area. - 7 - vIRGTDIIA: BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF 1~QANOICE OOUtaPY a~ N a- H z w E z O U O H D w 9 O a a a A 3.2± acre parcel of land, ) generally located at the intersection ) of Rt. 608 & Rt. 604, extending east ) within the ~ Hollins ) Magisterial District, and ) recorded as parcel # 40.01-1-17A ) portion thereof ) in the Roanoke County Tax Records. ) ZO THE IGNORABLE SUP~VISORS OF. ROAI~UKE OOtJ[J1'Y: PR~'F~R OF CONDITIONS 9~- Being in accord with Sec. 15.1-491.1 et seq. of the Code of Virginia and Sec. 21-1O5E of the Iboanoke County Zoning Ordinance, the Petitioner Roanoke County Board of Supervisors hereby voluntarily proffers to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia the following conditions to the rezoning of the above-referenced parcel of land: 1. Screening and buffering, type E, option 2. 2. Route 608 will not be used for industrial access. 3. An earthern berm will be provided to screen the loading dock area. Joe Dresnok Roano a Va ey eve opmen oundation Respectfully submitted, Petitioner - 10 - 98a- ~ N ~--i VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUN'T'Y A 3.2+ acre parcel of land, ) generally located at the inter- ) section of Route 608 and Route 604, ) ~xten ip~ easHollins ) wittlin ttrio Magisterial District, and ) recorded as parcel # 40.01-1-17a ) portion thereof ) in the Roanoke County Tax Records. ) FINAL ORDER TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUN'T'Y: H z w H z 0 U 0 H Q w 0 w WHEREAS, your Petitioner the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors did petition the Board of County Supervisors to rezone the above-referenced parcel from RE Residential Estate District to M-1 Light Industrial District for the purpose of buffering-as-well as •a pavement apron. WHEREAS, after due legal notice, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing of the petition on September 6 , 19 88 at which time, all parties in interest were given an opportunity to be heard; and WHEREAS, after full consideration at the public hearing held on _ 19 88 , the Board of County Supervisors determined that the rezoning be approved with proffer of conditions. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDERED that the aforementioned parcel of land, which is contained in the Roanoke County Tax Maps as Parcel 40.01-1-17 portion ~~flYer~fCOrded in Deek Book 1033 page 627 and legally described below, be rezoned from RE - Real Estate District to M-1 - Light Industrial District. September 27, - 8 - Legal Description of Property: 9~ Beginning at a point on the northerly right of way line of VA Route 604, said point being N 48° 49' 51" W, 251.79 feet from the intersection point of the right of way lines of US Route 460 and VA Route 604; thence along said right of way line N 48° 49' 51" W, 98.21 feet to a point; thence N 20° 28' 15" W, 70.05 feet to a point, being the intersection point of the right of way lines of VA Route 604 and VA Route 608; thence along the easterly right of way of VA Route 608 N 00° 41' 39" E, 152.20 feet to a point; thence N 03° 48' 09" E, 542.93 feet to a point; thence N 05° 18' 09" E, 534.07 feet to a point; thence with a curve to the right having a radius of 590.00 feet, an arc length of 144.51 feet, and a chord bearing and length of N 12° 19' 09" E, 144.15 feet to a point; thence N 19° 20' 09" E, 81.0 feet to a point on the approximate boundary of Roanoke Co~.nty and Botetourt County; thence leaving said right of vTay and following said boundary line S 61° E, 101.44 feet to a point; thence leaving said boundary line S 19° 20' 09" W, 63.97 feet to a point; thence with a curve to the left having a radius of 490.00 feet, an arc length of 120.01 feet and a chord bearing and length of S 12° 19' 09" W, 119.71 feet to a point; thence S OS° 18' 09" W, 534.07 feet to a point; thence S 03° 48' 09" W, 542.93 feet to a point; thence S 00° 41' 39" W, 281.28 feet to the place of beginning. BE IT FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this order be transmitted to the Secretary of the Planning Commission and that he be directed to reflect that change on the official zoning map of Roanoke County. ADOPTED on motion of Supervisor Johnson and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, McGraw, Nickens, Robers, Garrett NAYS: None ABSENT: None ~~~~ '~ C2-~-~-~ Deputy, Clerk Roanoke County Bc7ard of Supervisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Development & Inspections Dale Castellow, Acting Director, Planning Jonathan Hartley, Acting Zoning Administrator John Wiley, Director, Real Esta9e_Assessment VIROINIP,: BEELORE TEIE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROAI~KE COU[~TI'Y ao N r-1 rn H z w H z 0 U O H D W O a a a A 3.2± acre parcel of land, generally located at the intersection ) of Rt. 608 & Rt. 604, extending east ) o . within the Hollins ) Magisterial District, and ) recorded as parcel ~ 40.01-1-17A ) portion thereof . in the Roanoke County Tax Records. ) ~ Tf~ HONQRAB,LE SUPERVISORS OF. RQAlaOKE OOU[V'I'Y: PROFFER COI~IDITIONS Being in accord with Sec. 15.1-491.1 et seq. of the Code of Virginia and Sec. 21-1O5E of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance, the Petitioner Roanoke County Board of supervisors hereby voluntarily proffers to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia the following conditions to the rezoning of the above-referenced parcel of land: 1. Screening and buffering, type E, option 2. 2. Route 608 will not be used for industrial access. 3. An earthern berm will be provided to screen the loading dock area. Respectfully submitted, ,~ Joe :Dr~esnok ;. f-~ -- - Greater Roanoke Deve I! Petitioner -Foundation - 10 - t Corporation ~.-- ~ VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUN'T'Y A 3.2± acre parcel of land, > generally located at the inter- ) section of Route 608 and Route 604 ) extt,,ep i g east o ) within t~e Hollins Magisterial District, and recorded as parcel # 40.01-1-17a ) portion thereof ) in the Roanoke County Tax Records. ) RNDATION TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY: WHEREAS our Petitioner the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Y r,aG f;~xl with the Secretary to the Planning Commission a petition to rezone the b -referenced parcel of land frcm Residential Estate - RE District a ove to Light Industrial - M1 District for the purpose of a buffer and pavement apron to be used by Tweeds, Inc. WHEREAS, the petition was referred to the Planning Commission which, after due legal notice as required by Section 15.1-431 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as Se tember Ez, , 19 88 and amended, did hold a public hearing on P WHEREAS, at that public hearing all parties in interest were afforded an opportunity to be heard; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due consideration has reca~nded to the Board of County Supervisors that the rezoning be approved with conditions NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning C~anission reco[[-[~nds to the Board of County Supervisors that the above-referenced parcel of land be rezoned from RE to M1 with a°~nditions. The above action was adopted on motion of Ron Massey and upon the following recorded vote: p~y~. Robinson, Massey, Witt, Gordon, Winstead ~yg; None ABSENT• None Rem spectf~y s~ ed, Alternate Secretary Roanoke County Planning Commission L E G A L N O T I C E Notice is hereby given to all interested persons that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at their evening session beginning at 7:00 p.m. on Tuesday, SEPTEMBER 27, 1988 in the Community Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, S.W., Roanoke, Virginia, on the petition of ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS requesting rezoning from RE-RESIDENTIAL ESTATES to M-1 LIGHT INDUSTRIAL of a tract containing APPROXIMATELY 3.2 ACRES and located IMMEDIATELY EAST OF CLOVERDALE ROAD (ROUTE 604) AND KINGSMEN ROAD (ROUTE 608) in the HOLLINS Magisterial District. Rezoning has been requested for A BUFFER YARD IN CONJUNCTION WITH A CATALOG FULFILLMENT, CENTER. The County Planning Commission recommends APPROVAL' c..~i ~'lj ~r,~~,C~~-.~ ~0~`~ ~ ~D /~ 5 A copy of the Zoning Ordinance of Roanoke County and amendments thereto as well as a copy of the petition, site plan, and other documents related to this request may be examined in the office of the Department of Planning and Zoning, located in Room 600 of the Roanoke County Administration Center. Roanoke County will provide assistance to handicapped persons desiring to attend public hearings. Such individuals are requested to contact the County office of Personnel Services ([703] 772-2018) if special provisions are necessary for attendance. Given under my hand this SEVENTH day of SEPTEMBER, 1988. Mary H. A len, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Please publish in the evening edition of the Roanoke Times and World News on: TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 13, 1988 TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 20, 1988 Direct the bill for Publication to: ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS P. 0. BOX 29800 ROANOKE, VA. 24018 ITEM NUMBER ~ '~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER IN ROANOKE, VA., ON TUESDAY, MEETING DATE: September 27, 1988 AGENDA ITEM: Ordinance amending Roanoke County Procurement Code, Division 4, "Small Purchases" COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND: Roanoke County Procurement Code, Division 4., "Small Purchase" requires the following procedures and monetary limitations; 1, Purchases less than $500 - three (3) telephone quotes must be obtained, 2, Purchases between $500 and $10,000 - three (3) letter quotations must be obtained, These monetary limitations are considered archaic and impose restrictions on departments in the acquisition of supplies needed to complete ongoing tasks, SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: It is in the best interest of the County to prescribe small purchasing procedures that are not considered restrictive. Outlined below are recommended "small purchases" procedures; --- Purchases less than $500 in total costs; Obtain by utilization of blanket order system, --- Purchases between $500 and $5000 in total costs: Obtain through the Procurement Department by the utilization of at least three documented telephone quotes, --- Purchases between $5000 and $10,000 in total costs: Obtain through the Procurement Department by the utilization of three (3) letter quotations, ALTERNATIVES AND IMPACTS: These changes will allow for improved day to day operations within all County departments while maintaining compliance with state statutes governing procurement practices, STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval, _, SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED: L~ ~ - rl-ae- Council Elmer C. Hodge Dir ctor, Procurement Services County Administrator ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied ( ) _ Garrett __ Received ( ) ~ __ Johnson Referred ~ _ McGraw To Nickens - Robers ~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRCENTER ONLTUESDAYE SEPTEMBERO27TY19ggINISTRATION ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 17. PROCURE- MENT CODE, ARTICLE II. COMPETITIVE PRO- CUREMENT, DIVISION 4. SMALL PURCHASES CONCERNING SMALL PURCHASES BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That Division 4. Small Purchases of Article II. Competitive Procurement of Chapter 17. Procurement Code be amended and reenacted as follows: Section 17-90. Purchases of less than five hundred dollars. (a) This section shall apply to purchases of less than five hundred dollars ($500). (b) A using de artment or agency may make purchases by utilization of a blanket order system to be developed and distri- buted by the urchasing agent The purchasing agent has the au- thority to make urchases from vendors of choice so long as the urchase rice does not exceed five hundred dollars ($500). Con- tract re uirements shall not be artificiall divided so as to come within the rovisions of this section. A:€ter-~eeelpt-e€-a pr~~e~iase- ~eqt~}sltle~- teem- tl~e- using- departx~ent- er- ageney; - a t least-t~iree-{3}-telep~iene-~uetatlens-s~iall-be-ebtalneel; -~a~iene~aer pe9slble;-€e~-tl~e-purehase---A-telepl~ene-quetatlen-€ar~t-shall-be eempleted- llstingr- - Bate,- Item- Bese~lptlen;- ~uantlty;- pdartte- of Eet~pany , - Ine7lvldual- 6l~aing- Quete , - Prleing ; - 'Ierr~- arid- Bellvery Se~iedule---Tie-tetal-e€-all-lterxs-purel~ase-€~em-tl~ls-~eqr~}sltlen s~ieuld-~-et-exeeeel-€lie-l~urrdred-della~s-f$568}---6d~iere-p~aetleal; 1 ~ -/ star~dareli~eel-ir~genteries-axel-existing-eentraets-skeu}d-be-used-te satisfy-these-requests- Section 17-91. Purchases between five hundred and twenty-fige hunelred-ale}}ars five thousand dollars. (a) This section shall apply to purchases between five hundred dollars ($500) and tae- tl~eusasel- €ige- hut~elreel- ale}}ars {$;589} five thousand dollars ($5,000) in value. The purchas- ing agent may administratively make purchases of purel~ase up to $10,000. (b) After receipt of a purchase requisition from the using de artment or agency, at least three (3) telephone quota- tions shall be obtained, whenever possible, for the purchase. A telephone quotation form shall be completed listing: Date, Item Description, Quantity, Name of Company, Individual Giving Quote,_ Pricing, Term, and Delivery Schedule. The total of all items purchases from this requisition shall not exceed five thousand dollars ( $5 , 000) . PureY~ases- s~ia}}- lie- aeeemp}isl~ee7- t~ireugl~- tie use- a€- at- }east- three- {3}- }attar- quetatiens ; -~aheneger- passible- A- }attar- quotation- is- a-written- request-sent- te- at-feast- three {3}-genders- ~aitt~- a- speeif feel- reply- elate- and-time-- -This- is- tie mast-desirab}e-metl~ed-ef-aequiring-r~eeessary-items-and-s~ieu}d-be useel-~al~en-preper-p}anr~ing-al}eras-suf f ieient-time {e}- - T1~e- use- a€- letter- quetatians- requires- aelequate time- €er- preparatier~; - ma}}isq; -reeeipt- ar~el- award ; - genera}iy- tae {~}-er-three-{3}-~aee}~s-frem-tl~e-reeeipt-ef-tl~e-requisitien___g~}} quetatiens-reeeigad-after-t~ie-reply-elate-and-time-are-nen-respen- sige-and-ea~net-be-eessideree7- 2 ~ -- / fd}- - Requests- far- }attar- gr~etat~ens-are- ~ssr~ed- by- tie parel~as~-~g- agent-- - Te- lnltlate- tote- fetter- gr~etat~en; - tl~e- maser elepartfnent-sher~ld-sabm~t-a-eextpleteel-ree~tt~9~t~e~t-te-tie-pe~rel~a9- Ong-agent;-~~eled~-~g-a-1}st-e€-pass}ble-~et~dere;-~f-ava~lable- Section 17-91.1. Purchases between five thousand and ten thousand dollars. (a) This section shall apply to purchases between five thousand dollars and ten thousand dollars ($10,000) in value. The purchasing agent may administratively purchase up to ten thou- sand dollars ($10,000). (b) Purchases shall be accomplished through the use of at least three (3) letter quotations, whenever possible. A let- ter quotation is a written request sent to at least three (3) vendors with a specified reply date and time. This is the most desirable method of acquiring necessary items and should be used when proper planning allows sufficient time. (c) The use of letter quotations requires adequate time for preparation, mailing, receipt and award, generally two or three weeks from receipt of the requisition. All quotations received after the reply date and time are non-responsive and cannot be considered. (d) Request for letter quotations are issued by the purchasing agent. To initiate the letter quotations, the user department should submit a completed requisition to the purchasing agent, including a list of possible vendors, if avail- able. 3 2. This amendment ~~ shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage. ACTION # ITEM NUMBER ~_~_!'~"' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF TI.~ROB~~KE COUNTYEADMIONISTRATIONNOCENTER COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT I'HE MEETING DATE: September 27, 1988 AGENDA ITEM: Accepting an Off`ea aad d uEasementg t heAppalachiar g Power Company - Vis a Forest COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~ ~ ~~~~ SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: uested that the p,ppalachian Power Company (APCo) has req ht of way and a fifteen (15 ) f oot County of Roanoke convey a r ig Block 1, urchased the easement across a water tank Thet County d recentlylop /tank lot. Forest Edge Subdivision. articular water Forest Edge Water System and this p is easement would allow for the eCtricalase ~vicefto thetr.esal Th oles to provide el service lines and p a development of Valley dents of Vista Forest Subdivision, Developers, Inc. Section 18.04 of the Charter of Roanoke County requires that the acquisition of real estate or any interest therein be accomplished only by ordinance. The first reading of the proposed ordi~all bes held on September 27, 1988; the second reading October 11, 1988• FISCAL IMPACT: paid to Roanoke County by Valley Developers, Inc. ALTERNATIVES AND IMPACTS: 1. Authorize the County Administrator to execute such docu- ments and take such actiooms 1°. shb t el cony yance eof osaid as are necessary to acc P on form approved by property, all of which shall be up the County Attorney. 2, Do not authorize the Ceunsuch da tionsat on behalfcuof such documents and tak Roanoke County as ark ne all of whichcshpalls be uponnform ance of said proper y, approved by the County Attorney. STp,gF RECOMMENDATION: Approwed by, tfully submitted, Respec ~~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~~ Elmer C. od Paul M. Mahoney County Administrator County Attorney ______________________ ------------------------- VOTE ------------------- ACTION No Yes Abs Approved ( ) Motion by: Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred T o _-- Garrett Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE~ COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 27, 198$ ORDINANCE ACCEPTING AN OFFER AND AUTHORIZING THE CONVEYANCE OF A RIGHT OF WAY AND EASEMENT .TO APPALACHIAN POWER COMPANY - VISTA FOREST BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That pursuant to provisions of Section 18.04 of the Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading concerning the con- veyance of the hereinafter-described right of way and easement was held on September 27, 1988. A second reading on this matter will be held on October 11, 1988. This easement is located across a water tank lot located in Section 1, Block 1, Forest Edge Subdivision; and 2. That the conveyance of a right of way and a fifteen (15) foot easement from the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, to Appalachian Power Company for the sum of $ is hereby accepted and all other offers rejected. 3. That the County Administrator is authorized to exe- cute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County as are necessary to accomplish the conveyance of this right of way and easement, all of which shall be upon form approved by the County Attorney. ACTION # ITEM NUMBER _ ~_~ AT A REGULAR MEEL~NATOTHEHROAONOKE COUNTYEADMINISTRATIONNOCENTER COUNTY, VIRGINIA H MEETING DATE: September 27, 1988 AGENDA ITEM: Ordinance authorizing the acquisition of 4.199 acres from Salem Stone Corporation and James M. Turner Estate COUNTY /A~DMINISTRATO/Rf' S COMM,,E~N~TS~: %~ SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Staff has negotiated with Salem Stone Corporation and the James M. Turner_ Estat o0ti_13~ulocated4near the enda f_ VR~ginia County Tax Map No. 63 Secondary Route 778 e naccurately establishe the bou da y between acquisition will mor ro ert owner., as well the County's property and the aoinlncleapup pactions at the Dixie as provide a buffer for the on-g g Caverns Landfill site. Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter requires that the acquisition of real estate or any interest therein be accomp- lished only by ordinance•be~h27f 11988rethe seco dereadpngeailldbe nance was held on Septem , held on October 11, 1988. FISCAL IMPACTS: paid to Salem Stone Corporation and the James M. Turner Estate. Funds for this acquisition are available from __----' ALTERNATIVES: 1.. Authorize the County Administrator to execute such docu- ments and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County as are necessary to accomplish the aoved by the County Attorn Y all of which shall be upon form app 2. Do not authorize the County Administrator to execute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County as are necessary to accomplish the roved b t the CountydAptopneyy~ all of which shall be upon form app Y `~ Ste'- / PETITIONII.t: OCCIDENTAL DEVEIAPMEr1T CORPORATION CASE NCA'~iBER: 41-8/88 Planning Cc~nission Hearing Date: August 2, 1988 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: September 27, 1988 A. RD2UEST Petition of Occidental Develognent Corporation to rezone a 24.94 acre tract from R-1, Residential to R-3, Residential to construct multifamily dwellings located immediately west of the intersection of Colonial Avenue (Route 720) and Ogden Road (Route 681) in the Cave Spring Magisterial District. B. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION There were approximately 40 present in op~sition. Arthur Moody, Ruth Mosley, Mary and David Courey, W. H. Overstreet, Mark Seiler, Cletus Broyles and Craig McClellan voiced the following concerns: increased traffic; large parking areas may cause additional flooding; overload on already crowded schools; increased noise; additional apartments not needed in the area; an increase in the ntIInber of transient students already in the schools; single family housing would add to the stability of the neighborhood; traffic probl~ns on Colonial Avenue. C. SIGNIFICANT IMPACT FACTORS 1. Street Capacities: Estimated traffic generation for this proposal is approxi- mately 1,740 vehicle trips per day. Staff calculates that should the entire site be developed as single family residential, as permitted under the current R-1 designation (120 lots, each 7,200 sq.ft.), the site would gene- rate approximately 1,200 vehicle trips per day. This estimate asstnnes that 20$ of the site would serve as utility easements and street right of way. In 1986, ADT along Colonial Avenue, between Ogden Road and Georgetown Road (Route 1626) was 9,707. Traffic counts along Colonial Avenue north of the site between Ogden Road and Crystal Creek Drive (Route 897) revealed an ADT of 10,680. In 1986, peak hour traffic volumes for this section of Colonial Avenue were 874 vehicles (a.m.) and 1,135 vehicles (p.m.). More recent counts conducted on June 1, 1988 revealed an ADT of 11,344 along Colonial Avenue north of Ogden Road and 11,637 just south of Ogden Road. At this time WOT advises there are no improv~nent plans for Colonial Avenue. Plans for improvements to the eastern end of Ogden Road, from Route 419 to the Roanoke City line, are underway at this time. The merchants of Tanglewood Mall have requested that this section of Ogden Road be closed to through traffic during construction. VDOT advises that closing the roadway during construction will significantly reduce the time necessary to make these improv~nents. 2. Circulation: Immediate access to the site is limited to Colonial Avenue. Petitioner has proffered conditions which prohibit any additional points of access along Colonial Avenue. Construction of the complex entranceway will necessitate rephasing of the existing traffic signal at Colonial Avenue and Ogden Road. This signa] currently operates as a three phase signal. The additional lanes of traffic will require a four phase signal. The new signal will increase delay at thi: intersection. Between January 1987 and February 1988, one accident was reported at th intersection of Colonial Avenue and Ogden Road. During this same time perio~ three additional accidents were reported on Colonial Avenue in the vicinit of the proposed site. D. PROFFERED CONDITIONS ! ~,~ - , 1. Old Towne Road, Ashmeade Drive and Greencliff Road will not be extended beyond their present terminuses at the boundary of the referenced parcel or otherwise used for vehicular access to or f ran the parcel. 2. No more than 11 dwelling units per acre will be constructed on the land. 3. Access to petitioner's intended development with the parcel will be by a single entrance on Colonial Avenue at its intersection with Ogden Road. 4. Petitioner will include within its development a stormtwater detention pond sufficient to detain increased surface water runoff from the development following a 10-year storm with a release rate of the increased water no greater than would follaa a 2-year storm. 5, For the 30 days following approval of rezoning, members of the Roanoke Archaeological Society (RAS) will have permission to survey and examine the land for artifacts and other items of archaeological significance. In keep- ing with petitioner's desire to preserve the greenery and natural appearance of the land insofar as possible in connection with its development, no tools or equipment other than hand tools may be used for exploration, except with petitioner's written consent to the contrary. In its discretion petitioner may request that persons caning onto the land agree to hold the petitioner and the owner of the property harmless from claims arising fran injury or damage to such persons and their property. In addition, the petitioner agrees to make the following disposition of the two older cabins situated on the land. Catherine V. Ronk, the present owner of the land, in a contract with the petitioner has reserved the right for 90 days beyond closing the sale and purchase of the land to remove the two cabins. If such 90-day period expires without Mrs. Ronk's having canmenced removal of one or both cabins or if Mrs. Ronk notifies petitioner in advance of the expiration of 90 days that she will not remove either or both cabins, then RAS will have the right to remove whichever cabin or cabins that Mrs. Ronk has chosen not to remove. Petitioner reserves the right, however, to designate the period of time in which the RAS must conclude removal, based upon such considerations as whether the removal activities beyond a particular date will hinder petitioner's site preparation or other construction activity. The petitioner also reserves the right to require that RAS or other persons acting under its direction or with its consent enter into agreements with petitioner in reasonable form to protect the petitioner against liability or cost that might arise f ran the removal activities. 6. Development of the land in this parcel will be in substantial conformity to the concept plan dated 7/11/88 by Buford T. Lumsden, a copy of which plan has been submitted with petitioner's application. However, petitioner may elect to construct fewer buildings and dwelling units than depicted on the concept plan. 7. An entrance marker sign and plaques, or some combination thereof, may be placed at the entrance of the property. The entrance marker sign, if used, will have no more than two faces and will contain no more than 75 sq.ft. of surface area on any one face. No more than two plaques will be used; each will have a single face containing no more than 9 sq.ft. of surface area on a face. For purposes of promotion and lease-up during construction and for the one year following construction, petitioner may maintain a sign within the interior of the property situated no closer than 50 feet to Colonial Avenue and having a single face with a surface area of no more than 128 sq.ft. to cannunicate such information as the name of the community, office hours, a - 2 - ~B~ -~ letion ele hone number or numbers, rental rereSthandone yearufromftheacomp This t P ro rt no long sign will remain on the P Pe y regulate traffic, of construction. Other signs that identify buildings, desi Hate parking areas and the like thate rronect Without restriction us from g Colonial Avenue may be utilized within P ~ rties in the immediate vicinity of adjacent residential prope fare g, Area lighting li ht les will not will be focused toward the irierioes dents.prFr~s~ndingld g necpoessa and distraction to neighbo ng of the lighting will not exceed exceed 2andles on the ground beneathtthellamp• 2-foot c building will be constructed closer than 100 feet to the Georgetown Park g. No subdivision. of the type described as 'T'ype C-Option 2 in Section 21-92(G) of the 10. Buffering Ordinance will be provided along the boundary of Roanoke County Zoning rowth does not Georgetown Park and Greenwood Forest where ~ltion 2 buffering specifies a provide reasonably similar buffering. 'I'YPe C- Op 5-foot buffer yard with small evergree linear feet)gand uevergreene shrubs 2 15 feet or greater and planted each 15 Navin an ultimate height of 6 feet or granting will o c urcass soonlas ( g lanted each five feet). of planting and p feasible in the course of construction. sters will be screened by solid wooden fencing and landscaping. ~ 11. All dump dumpster will be closer than 75 feet to Georgetown Park or Greenwood Fores O The ratio of 1-bedroom to 2-bedroom units will not vary by more than 1 12. ro sal (156 one-bedroom and 108 two-bedroom percent from the original p Po units). AND REASON E. COMMISSIONER' S MOTION, VO'L`E rove the petition with proffered conditions on the basis Mr. Witt moved to app rehensive Plan despite the traffic that the petition is consistent with the Cane roll call conditions on Colonial Avenue. The motion carried with the following vote: Witt, Winstead AYES; Robinson, Massey, NAyS: Gordon ABSENT; None F, DISSENTING PF,~PECTIVE ect because of a single Mr. Gordon stated thatA enue/Ogden Roadngntersectione prof access at the Colonial G . ATTACHNIENI'S Concept Plan (8~" x 11") Vicinity Map (8~" x 11") ~ Staff Report Other: '~~; ~ ~ to Secretary Jon I~rtley, Alte Roane County Planning CaYUnission - 3 - t C.../ G/ ~ ~ t v'~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ 1 .ti °~$ o ' ~ ~ ~ a: < $ ~ Z C 11 ~y p U F~ ~ Y~ Q ~ z ~ P j; K 3 ~ 'g<( +~j C W ~ J N LL b ~ O ~ O : ~ g `Q{~ 1- Y J' C Y m' .~ G ~ D Y ~ m t ' y4 ~D H u /~ a .^ ~ < ' ^ OQpG U > • ~ ~ ~ r ~ ~ 5 ~~I ' 1IY'[N ~ 1 YI (~^ _ ~ •1~~'~1.•'. J.'.... ear ( ~' I I \ '' r'~ I I f ~ '~ \~ 1 Fy ~~ r 1 < ~ Iw^ r ,~ , ~ ,' 1 ~' II ~j f~. ~ ~' `~'. FI r 77 1I :~t~I I~~ ~ :l A~N.UM ~ ~ ~ - I ; 1 ~ Ot 1 ~~ 1 ~' l I iy ~l I' ~~ 1 j ~ V ti~ i_ j I i I ~_ _~~~F ~ j I r I' ' i 1 I ~'~ o li _I;~ .~ I ~, „ c -- . Y --~-------1- ,~~?.-a - ----4--- •. I I ~ _ .. ~'~ 1{`1;11 } I - ~ I ~~~ i ~~ 1 ', •1 ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ --ai ,,`~~ r~ ' `~ F '~yy p .'. i - 4 - 9'~~/ D unQTu .. „..... - 5 - + Occidental Development LTD ` ROANOKE COUNTY R-1 to R-3C DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT Tax Map ~~ 77.11-1-55 " /~ STAFF REPORT CASE NUMBER: 41-8/88 PETITIONER: Occidental Development REVIEWED BY: Dale Castellow DATE: August 2, 1988 Petition of Occidental Development LtResidentialeto construct parcel from R-1, Residential to R-3, multi-family dwellings, located immediately west of the intersec- tion of Colonial Avenue (Route 720) and Ogden Road (Route 681) in the Cave Spring Magisterial District. 1. NATURE OF REQUEST a. Conditional request to develop a 264 unit rental apartment complex. b. Attached concept plan and zoning vicinity map describe the project more fully. 2. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS a. The R-3, Multi-family Residential District, permits a variety of reslexeslatownhouseslandnhighlriseaapartments. dwellings, dup Churches, day care centers and nursery schools are also permitted within the R-3 district. b. Petitioner has profatind the proposed developmentnscheme July 28, 1988 Indic g for the residential complex. Petitioner has also proffered several other conditions pertaining to the physical development of this site. c. Site plan revieeloimenteregulationso eAsupartooflthecsite with County dev p plan review process, petitioner may be required to delineate any floodway that may be situateFloodplainite (see attached Ordinance 82587-7 revising Regulations"). d, A commercial entrance permit will be required fVDOTthe Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT). reserves the rigan entrancerpermitaffic impact study upon application for 3. SITE CHARACTERISTICS a. Topography: Moderately sloping toward Colonial Avenue. b. Ground Cover= amilrecemeterylplotrowTwo singlebfamily grass, and a f Y structures (one abandoned, one occupied) with two accompanying storage cabins are also located on the site. 4. AREA CHARACTERISTICS a. Future Growth Priority: Situated within the Cave Spring - 6 - 7 c~8' °! Community Planning Area; designated for stabilized growth. Urban services are available. b. General area is denscommercialpeoffice andginstitutional family residential, uses. 5. LAND USE IMPACT ASSESSMENT Rating: Rate each fSetarscalerllthroughh5,impact of the proposed action. U 3 manageable 1 positive impact, 2 = negligible impact, 4 disruptive impact, 5 = severe impact, and N/A impact, not applicable. COMMENTS RATING FACTOR LAND USE COMPATIBILITY 2 a. Comprehensive Planea withinoapDevelopmenDelandpmsetcaten has placed this ar Moderate to high density residential uses (6 12 gory. units per acre) are permitted with moderate compatibility in Development areas. This proposal calls for approxi- 10.6 units per acre. Significantly higher mately densities are permitted under R-3 district regulations. Petitioner hasconstructedtontthe site than 11 units per acre would be Petition is consistent with the Future Land the following map and applicable policies. Specifically, policies support the petitioners request: D-1 {manage new residential growth ~in°rofnmultipfamilyshousingcunits}y}, D-4 (promote cluste g and D-8 (permit multi-family development if exceptional design and site plahichgencouragessdirectvaccessaontola - ty}. Policy D 9- w collector or arterial street where a risialsolconsistent ment increases density significantly, with the petitioner's request. g b. Surrounding Land: Singiehwamily residential, institutional and a minor arterial h g Y 3 c. Neighboring Areatitutionaliacommunity servicetandaaiminor residential, ins arterial highway. g d. Site Layout: Attachehtcstructuresncontainingp264frental Proposal includes eig apartments. Four str4cunits eacha whilecthearemainingts, three would contain 2 structure would be 48 enbedroomsunits and 108ptwo bedroom be comprised of 156 on units. The concept planrineffort willebepmadeptoepreservelasemuch advises that eve y - 7 - ~8~ - / of the naturalltionsawhichaprohibitlmorepthanioneraccess proffered cond point from Coloniexistingelocaltstreets insthesGeorgetown that none of the Park subdivision will be extended beyond their present terminuses. 3 e. Architecture: Tradhtstructurelwouldtbebtwokandnone-half vinyl siding. Eac stories in height W1cturesufareexceedsdtheescaleTof thele of the prop°singlerfamily units. neighboring and Landscaping: Extensive landscaping has been 2 f. Screening between proposed along the western border of the property the site and the Georgetown Paretitionerswill besrequired the site plan review process, p to comply with the screening and buffering provisions of the County's Zoning Ordinance. Petitwillradherertofered that on site screening and buffering of the County of Type C, Option 2 of Section 21-92 (G) Roanoke Zoning Ordthaachedgehof smallnevergreen treesfand yard of 25 feet w one row of evergreen shrubs. 3 g. Amenities: Adequate parking has been proposed for the apartment complex rorosed)ce requires 351 stalls; 487 stalls have been p P Petitioner hasscreenedeandhthatlnoddumpster will be closer appropriately than 75 feet to Georgetown Park or Greenwood Forest subdivisions. Petitioner has also proffered that area lighting will eestanding lightfpolenwillbexceedr201feetein and that no fr height. Upon review of tbeenPidentifiedtasfahpotentiallyesignifi- this parcel has uide cant archaeological site. Pursuant to the policy g lines set forth innahUseePlanCetheostaffohasuinformedhboth County's Future La the petitioner and the site survey chairman of Toeensureke Archaeological Society (RAS) of this finding. that the RAS has sdthattmayibe contained onethetsitea the unearth any relic petitioner has prgft,orsearchdtheositehfor aoperiodroft30 members of the RA days upon approval of the petition. 3 h. Natural features: Petitioner advises that apPraundacover steps will be taken to ensure that existing g and foliage will be preserved. Two springs are also located on the site. - 8 - 98 ~- / TRA££IC 4 i. Street Capacities: Estimated740avehiclentripsoperodayhis proposal is approximately 1- Staff calculates that should the eermittedtunderdtheloped as single family residential, as p current R-1 designation (120 lots, each 7,200 square feet}, the site would genmateeassumes1that120%~ofOthehsite trips per day. This esti would serve as utility easements and street right-of-way. In 1986, ADT along Colonial Avenue, between Ogden Road and Georgetown Road (Rt. 1626) was 9,707. Traffic counts along Colonial Avenue north of the revealedwannADTdof Road and Crystal Creek Drive (Rt. 897) 10,680. In 1986, peak hour traffic volumes for thisand section of ColoniaM•AvenMoreerecent countseconducted on 1,135 vehicles (P ) Colonial June 1, 1988 revealed an AD''' of 11,344 along Avenue north of Ogden DOTdadvises~thereuaresnotimprovement Road. At this time, V plans for Colonial Aveoad• fromnRtfo419mtootheeRoanokethe eastern end of Ogden R city line, are underw~e uestedsthatethishsectionaofsOgden Tanglewood Mall have q Road be closed t~ closing thefroadwaylduringsconstruction VDOT advises tha will significantly reduce the time necessary to make these improvements. 4 j. Circulation: Immedietitionershas profferediconditionsto Colonial Avenue. P which prohibit any additional points of access along Colonial Avenue. Construction of texistingetrafficnsignalwatlColonialtate rephasing of the Avenue and Ogden Road. This signal currently operates as a three phase sigurl'haseesignalionThelnewssignalawill will require a fo P increase delay at this intersection. Between Januare intersectionrofrColonialnAvenuedand Ogden reported at th Road. During thiColonialeAvenuehinethedvicinityaofithe s were reported on proposed site. UTILITIES 2 k. Water: Adequate supply and distribution. 2 1. Sewer: Adequate treatment and transmission. DRAINAGE - 9 - 98g -i 2 m. Basin: No problems noted. 3 n. Floodplain: Thelpnatedebysthe FederallEmergency Management hazard area des g the Agency. As part of the site plan review process, petitioner may be required to delineate any flood hazard areas situated on the site (see attached Ordinance 82587-7 revising Floodplain Regulations). The petitioner has proffered11construction of a 10-year storm water detention facility with a 2-Year release rate. PUBLIC SERVICES 2 0. Fire Protection: Within established service area. 2 p. Rescue: Within established service area. 2 q. Parks and Recre~~1OhedOsitetplan)reation facilities are proposed (see a 3 r. School: Petitioner has advised the County staff that the proposed complex would be marketed as an adult community, i.e., specifically for childless young professionals and "empty nesters." Assuming the petitioner is successful in his efforts, this proposal should have minimal impact on the County school system. However, should the petitioner resort to families as potential tenants for the proposed 96 two bedroom units, this complex could generate approxi- mately 17 new students for the County school system. (This figure is based on regional demographic multipliers for two bedroom garden apartments.) The estimated cost of ed- ucating one child in Roanoke County is approximately $3,715, of which 51,796 is locally funded. Using this figure, staff estimates that this project could require an additional $30,532 of county educational services. It should also be noted that public schools in Southwest Roanoke County are already at peak capacity. TAB BASE 1 s. - TaxabledGrossoSales/YearueN/A3'S million - Total Employees: 6 - Total revenue to the County/Year: ANEWoREVENUEy $34,500 ENVIRONMENT 2 t. Air: ? u. Water: Two springnoaknowncadverse affectton theespringsed project will have 2 v. Soils: 2 w. Noise: - 10 - 4 -~ 3 x. Signage: Petitioner has proffered conditions which limit the amount of signage permitted on the site. Specifically, the petitioner has proffered that no more than three signs with 186 square feet of sign face would be permanently erected at the site's entrance. The proffered conditions also include provisions for a temporary sign, 128 square feet in size, to be erected for a period of one year. 6. PLAN CONSISTENCY This area is designated as a Development land use category. The petitioner's request is consistent with the land use plan map and applicable policies. 7. STAFF EVALUATION a. Strengths: (1) Consistent with Future Land Use Plan map and applicable policies. (2) Site layout includes ample open spice. (3) Petitioner has proffered conditions which limit the amount of signage permitted on the site. (4) Petitioner has proffered conditions allowing the Roanoke Archaeological Society to survey the site for potentially significant relics. (5) Petitioner has also proffered that no additional points of access will be constructed along Colonial Avenue or into the Georgetown Park subdivision. b. Weaknesses: (1) Proposal will increase traffic congestion along Colonial Avenue. (2) Scale of the proposed residen- tial structures far exceeds the scale of surrounding residential structures. (3) In the event the petitioner is unsuccessful in his marketing efforts for an adult community, the proposal may have an adverse impact the County's school system. c. Suggested Proffers: None - 11 - AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF R COUNTY,~VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINIST CENTER IN ROANOKE, VA,~ OANOKE ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 25 ~TION 1987 ORDINANCE 82___587_7 AMENDING AND REENACTING THE ROANOKE COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE TO REVISE THE FLOODpLAIN REGULATIONS WHEREAS, the first reading and public hearing on th' Hance was held on Jul is ordi- Y 28, 1987, and the second readin ordinance was held on Au g on this gust 25, 1987; and WHEREAS, the health safet Y, and general welfare of the citizens of Roanoke County require the adoption of regulations to minimize adverse environmental im standards and from the dangers of flooding and the drains pacts resulting storm waters• ge of surface and and WHEREAS, Section 15.1-292 15.1-466, 15.1-486, 15.1- 489, and 15.1-490 of the Code of Virginia, 1950 authorize the count_ as amended y to adopt ordinances and to exercise such general powers to prevent the pollution of water; to make, erect, and construct drains, sewers, and public ducts; to establish reasonable standards for drainage regulations of subd-ivis' developments• ions or and to provide safety from flood, flood protection, and to protect a ainst the loss of life g health, or ' property from flood and other similar dangers; and WHEREAS, Roanoke Count y and its citizens have suffered and continue to suffer the harmful effects of floodin quate drains a of surface waters g and inade- g and from the volume and velo- city of storm water runoff; and - 12 - ~~~ r WHEREAS, these hazards and dangers to public health, safety, and welfare are caused in art b P y climate, topography and the development of land. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Super- visors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that the Roanoke County Code is amended and reenacted as follows: 1. Amend Appendix A, the Roanoke County Zoning Ordin- ance, Section 21-61, "Floodplains," by revising sub-section D, "Floodplain Area," and sub-sub-section (c) to read as follows: Section 21-61 D• Floodplain area (c) The Approximated Floodplain shall be that flood- plain area for which no detailed flood profiles or elevations a re provided, but where a a ane hundred f189} pear €leedplain beartd- ark` has: beers $PPreximated the draina a area is reater than one hundred (100) acres. Such areas are shaWn ma_ on the Flood Boundary and Floodway Map. Where the specific 100-year flood elevation cannot be determined for this area using other sources of data such as the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Flood- plain Information Reports, U.S. Geological Survey Flood Prone Quadrangles, etc., then the applicant for the proposed use, devel- opment and/or activity shall determine this elevation in accor- dance with hydrologic and hydraulic engineering techniques. Hydrologic and hydraulic analyses shall be undertaken only by - 13 - ~~~~ r professional engineers or others of demonstrated qualifications, who shall certify that the technical methods used correctly re- flect currently accepted technical concepts. Calculations for the design flood shall be related to existing land use and poten- tial development under existing zoning. Studies, analyses, compu- tations, etc., shall be submitted in sufficient detail to allow a thorough review by the County Engineer. 2. The effective date of this ordinance shall be August 26, 1987._ On motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by Supervisor Johnson, and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None A COPY - TESTE: .J~ Mary H. llen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors s/2s/s7 cc: File John Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator Phillip Henry, Director of Engineering Rob Stalzer, Director of Planning Paul Mahoney, County Attorney Thomas M. Blaylock, Commonwealth Attorney Magistrate Sheriff's Department Roanoke Law Library, 315 Church Avenue Roanoke Main Library Roanoke County Code .~~`2```~3C4~~ .Q ,. ~ ~•~, p9~ C "; , y '° ~'f~'F~G`~j ~~~~ 6 8 ~- - 14 - ~'8g -1 N rn H Z w N z 0 U 0 H Q w 0 a a a VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY arcel of land generally) A 24.94 acre p ) located on the western side of Colonial Avenue, S.W. opposite the ) intersection of Ogden Road within ) the Cave Spring Magisterial District,) art of parcel ) and being a P ~~ 77.11-1-55) in the Roanoke County ) Tax Records. FINAL ORDER Occidental Development, Ltd. TO THE HONORABLE SUPEPVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY: our Petitioner Occidental Development, Ltd. WHEREAS, y ervisors to rezone t e did petition the Board of County Sup arcel from R-1 Single Family above-referenced 24.94-acre p 'dential District to R-3 Multi-Family ResidentoaCeD~ainict Resi for the purpose of multi-family housing subject t conditions proferred by the Petitioner. after due legal notice, the Planning Commission WHEREAS, ust 2, 1988, at etition on Aug did hold a public hearing of the P iven an opportunity which time, all parties in interest were g to be heard; and ublic hearing WHEREAS, after full consideration asap T Psors determined 1988, the Board of County on Se}~t. 27, subject to the conditions that the rezoning be granted, proferred by the Petitioner. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDERED that the afor keeCountydTax parcel of land, which is contained in the Roano Ma s as Parcel 77.11-1-55 and recorded in Deeded fromSR-1 P be rezon page 593 and legally described below, Family Residential District to R-3 Multi-Famiic larlyen- Single tial District. The property so rezoned is more part - 15 - W ETHERI NGTON $ MELCHIONNA "'! described as follows: All that tract of land in Roanoke County Virginia more particularly described as follows: TRA~T 1 (24.94 acres to be rezoned from R-1 to R-3) BEGINNII`dG at Corner 1, an iron pi_n set on the western ht of way of varying line of Colonial Avenue (having a rTe erty now or formerly width) at the northeast Bushnellfand Nellie E. Bushnell; belonging to Charles A. thence N. 44° 58' 00" W. 519.26 feet to a met to a2'set "'E. 352.10 fe hickory; thence N. 31° 33' 00 iron pi_n; thence N. 53° 34' 00 W. 652.50 feet to a et iron pin designated Corner 4; thence N. 23° 13' 07" s thence N. 23° 45' 07" E. 446.16 feet to a set iron pin; i e; thence S. 50° 43' E. 370.00 feet to an existing iron P P ro erty now or 51" E. 1,237.80 feet along the line of p P formerly owned by the City of Roanoke to a set iron pin designated Corner 7 on the western side of Co~helWesternue' thence (and with all remaining°cou0rs35~~a~°rig05.68 feet to side of Colonial Avenue) S. 31 3 ° 29' 25" W. 9.00 feet to a point; a point; thence N. 58 Dint; thence S. thence S. 31° 30' 35" W. 10.00 feet to a p Dint; thence S. 31° 30' 35" 58° 29' 25" E. 9.00 feet to a P ° ~ ~5" W. 9.00 Dint; thence N. 58 29 W, 81.00 feet to a p ~~ yJ, 10.00 feet to a feet to a point; thence S. 31° 30' 35 Dint; 29 25" E. 9.00 feet to a p point; thence S. 58° ~ Dint; thence with thence S. 31° 30' 35'' W. 370.32 feet to a p whose radius is 2,316.83 feet and whose a curve to the left, ° ~~ y~, 316.50 chord bearing and distance are S' eet to a3point; thence S. feet, the arc distance of 316•75oint designated Corner 18; 23° 40' 35" W. 37.69 feet to a P 839.79 thence with a curve to the left whose raelaTe1S.225° p6' 08" WETHERINGTON feet and whose chord bearing and distanc $~ MELCHIONNA the arc distance of 141.32 feet to W. 141.30 feet, - 16 - ~~~ containing in the Corner 1 and the point of beginning, a re ate 24.94 acres and being designated as Tract ~kl, all gg g lat of survey entitled "Plat according to that certain p -- dated Showing Property of Catherine Aicaguerre Ronk , A rig 25~ lggg by Buford T. Lumsden & Associates, P.C., p this the details of which plat are incorporated herein by reference. of this order be BE IT FURTHER ORDERED that a copy transmitted to the Secretary of the Planning Commiofficiald that he be directed to reflect that change on the zoning map of Roanoke County. ADOPTED on motion of Supervisor Rob and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens NAYS: Supervisor Garrett ABSENT: None Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Develo ment & Inspections Arnold Covey, Director, P Dale Castellow, Acting Director, Planning Jonathan Hartley, Acting Zoning Administrator John Wiley, Director, Real Estate Assessment WETHERINGTON $ MELCHIONNA - 17 - ~~~ VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY A 24.94 acre parcel of land generally) located on the western side of Colonial Avenue, S.W. opposite the ) intersection of_ Ogden Road within ) the Cave Spring Magisterial District,) art of parcel ) and being a p ~~ 77.11-1-55) in the Roanoke County j Tax Records. AMEN D PROFFER OF CONDITIONS July 5, 1988 Occidental Development, Ltd. (further amended August 2, 1988 to modify condition ~~2) TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY: Being in accord with Sec. 15.1-491.1 et set• oZonin Code of Virginia and Sec. 21-105E of the Roanoke CountyLtd. g Ordinance, the Petitioner Occidental Development, hereb voluntarily proffers to the Board of Supervisors of y P.oanoke County, Virginia the following COOfdland s to t e rezoning of the above-referenced parcel roffer of conditions su ersedes the proffer of This p p conditions tendered with the Petitioner's petition and appli- cation. 1, Old Towne Road, Ashmeade Drive and Greencliff Roa and their present terminuses at the will not be extended bey boundary of the referenced parcel or otherwise used for vehicular access to or from the parcel. WETHERINGTON $ MELCHIONNA ~S~ -I er acre will be ~• No more than eleven morelthanutwoshundred sixty-four constructed on the land. No dwelling units will be constructed in the enti~s willlcontain No more than one hundred eighteen dwelling uni as many as two bedrooms. No dwelling unit will contain more than two bedrooms. 3• Access to Petitioner's intended developmaitAvenuenat the parcel will be by a single entrance on Colon den Road, S.W. its intersection with Og 4• Petitioner will include within ltetaineincreased storm-water detention pond sufficient to d g „10_ ear ment followin a y surface-water runoff from tof dheeincreased water no greater storm" with a release rate than would follow a "2-year storm". s following approval of rezoning, 5• For the 30 day members of the Roanoke Archaeological Socieartifactsaandpother mission to survey and examine the land for with items of archaeological significance. In keeping , reserve the greenery and natural Petitioner s desire to p earance of the land insofar as possible in connection with aPP ui ment other than hand tools its development, no tools or eq P ma be used f_or exploration, except with Petitioner's written Y consent to the contrary. In its discretion Petitioner ma ree to hold the request that persons coming onto the land ag etitioner and the owner of the property harmless from claims P ersons and their arising from injury or damage to such p ro erty. In addition, the Petitioner agrees to make the P P following disposition of the two older cabinsfsthealand,nin a land. Catherine V. Ronk, the present owner o ontract with the Petitioner has reserved the right for 90 c urchase of the land to days beyond closing the sale and P eriod expires without Mrs. remove the two cabins• Ifmoval of one or both cabins or if Mrs. Ronk's having commenced re notifies Petitioner in advance of the expiratinnRoanokedays Ronk the WETHERINGTON that she will not remove either or both cabins , $~ MELCHIONNA 2 "'./ ht to remove whichever Archaeological Society will 'nave the rig cabin or cabins that Mrs. Ronk has chrsetondesignateothe Period howeve , Petitioner reserves the right, based upon of time in which the Society must concludi activities beyond such considerations as whether the remova re aration or a particular date will hinder Petitioitionerlalso reserves the other construction activity. The Pet ht to require that Roanoke Archaeological Socinsentrenterr r~g persons acting under its direction or with its co rotect into agreements with Petitioner in reasonable forhtterPse from the Petitioner against liability or cost that mig the removal activities. arcel will be in 6, Development of the land in thilan dated July 11, 1988 substantial conformity to the conceptCP' a copy of which plan by Buford T. Lumsden & Associates, lication and petition. has been submitted with PeeCtltoeconstruct fewer buildings and However, Petitioner may el P lan. dwelling units than depicted on the conce t p la ues, or some combi- 7, An entrance markeCedlat the entrance of the property. y la nation thereof, ma be p The entrance marker sign, if used, will have no more than two uare feet of surface faces and will contain no more than twosplaques will be used; area on any one face. No mor uare each will have a single face containing no msrefthromotionsand feet of surface area on a face• for P heP one yearpfollowing lease-up during construction and n within the interior construction, Petitioner may maintain a sig f the roperty situated no closer than 50 feet reaCofonoamore o P Avenue and having a single face wtehsuchuinformation as the than 128 square feet to communicy a tele hone number or office hours, P name of the community, umbers, rental rates and other such informationearTfromsthe n wil_1 remain on the property no longer than one letion of construction. Other signs that identike thatdares' comp regulate traffic, designate parking areas and the WETHERINGTON $ MELCHIONNA 3 9~8-~ not visible or conspicuous from Colonial Avenue may be utilized within the project without restriction. 8. Area lighting in the immediate vicinity of adjacent residential properties will be focused toward the interior of the project to avoid unnecessary glare and distraction to neighboring residents. Freestanding light poles will not exceed 20 feet in height, and the intensity of the lighting will not exceed 2-foot candles on the ground beneath the lamp. 9. No building will be constructed closer than 100 feet to the Georgetown Park subdivision. Z0. Buffering of the type described as "Type C-Option 2" in Section 21-92(G) of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance will be provided along the boundary of Georgetown Park and Greenwood Forest where existing natural growth does not provide reasonably similar buffering. "Type C-Option 2" buffering specifies a 25-foot buffer yard with small evergreen trees (having an ulti- mate height of 15 feet or greater and planted each 15 linear feet) and evergreen shrubs (having an ultimate height of 6 feet or greater, at least 18 inches at time of planting and planted each five feet). Planting will occur as soon as feasible in the course of construction. 11. All dumpsters will be screened by solid wooden fencing and landscaping. No dumpster will be closer than 75 feet to Georgetown Park or Greenwood Forest. Respectfully submitted, Occidental Development,Ltd. By: Counse or Petitioner WETHERINGTON S~ MELCHIONNA 4 BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY VIRGINIA: A 24.94 acre parcel of land generally) located on the western side of ) Colonial Avenue, S.W. opposite the ) intersection of Ogden Road within ) the Cave Spring Magisterial District,) and being a part of_ parcel ) ~~ 77.11-1-55) in the Roanoke County ) Tax Records. ) RECOMMENDATION Occidental Development, Ltd. TO THE HONORABLE SUPEPVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY: WHEREAS, your Petitioner Occidental Development, Ltd. has filed with the Secretary to the Planning Commission a petition to rezone the above-referenced 24.94-acre parcel of land from R-1 Single Family Residential District to R-3 Multi-Family Residential District for the purpose of multi- family dwellings. WHEREAS, the petition was referred to the Planning Commission which, after due legal notice by Section 15.1-431 of the Code of_ Virginia of 1950, as amended, did hold a public hearing on August 2, 1988; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due consideration has recommended to the Board of County Supervisors that the rezoning be granted, subject to the conditions proferred by the Petitioner. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOI_,VED that the Planning Commission recommends to the Board of County Supervisors that the above-referenced parcel of land be rezoned as requested, subject to the conditions proffered by the Petitioner. WETHERINGTON S~ MELCHIONNA The above action was adopted on motion I~drn Witt and upon'the following recorded vote: AYES: Robinson, Massey, Witt, Winstead NAYS: Gordon ABSENT: None Respectfully submitted, ~~~ Alternate Secretary Roanoke County Planning Commission WETHERINGTON R~ MEICHIONNA 9~~-~ 2 L E G A L N O T I C E Notice is hereby given to all interested persons that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at their evening session beginning at 7:00 p.m. on Tuesday, SEPTEMBER 27, 1988 in the Community Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, S.W., Roanoke, Virginia, on the petition of OCCIDENTAL DEVELOPMENT LTD. requesting rezoning from R-1 RESIDENTIAL to R-3 RESIDENTIAL of a tract containing 24.94 ACRES and located IMMEDIATELY WEST OF THE INTERSECTION OF COLONIAL AVENUE AND ODGEN ROAD in the CAVE SPRING Magisterial District. Rezoning has been requested to construct a 264 UNIT RENTAL APARTMENT COMPLEX. The County Planning Commission recommends APPROVAL WITH PROFFERED CONDITIONS. A copy of the Zoning Ordinance of Roanoke County and amendments thereto as well as a copy of the petition, site plan, and other documents related to this request may be examined in the office of the Department of Planning and Zoning, located in Room 600 of the Roanoke County Administration Center. Roanoke County will provide assistance to handicapped persons desiring to attend public hearings. Such individuals are requested to contact the County office of Personnel Services ([703] 772-2018) if special provisions are necessary for attendance. Given under my hand this EIGHTH day of SEPTEMBER, 1988. rnQ~_, ~. Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Please publish in the evening edition of the Roanoke Times and World News on: TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 13, 1988 TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 20, 1988 Direct the bill for Publication to: MR. DONALD L. WETHERINGTON WETHERINGTON & MELCHIONNA 1100 CESTAR BANK BUILDING ROANOKE, VA. 24022 f U E S T A P P E A R th N C E ~? ---- /4~~~/~ ~~S! ~ i t~zt~~` .^ C~' m ~ cJr~1~ s ~ 1 ~-j ~. ~~ I -~ <~~l h~ p~eT,-.L Q~nRTNf~ ON ~ "rte ~ ike the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to I would 1 ize me during the public hearing on the above matter so recogn uidelines listed that I may comment. I agree to follow the g WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND below. ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. Each speaker will have betwasnanhindividualvorminutes it 1. available whether speaking and re resentative. The chairman will decideo hantissue,m P the majority of based on the nuebrulefunlesseinstructedgbY will enforce th the Board to do otherwise. Dint of eakers will be limited to a presentation be entertained by 2• SP Questions of clarification may view only. the Chairman. comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between 3, All Baker and audience members is not allowed. a recognized sp at all Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy 4. times . eakers are requested to leave any written statements 5. SP and/or comments with the cler FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL (, INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK E WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTESENTATHEM,FROM THE GROUP FIL ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REP P L E A S E W R I T E L E G I B L Y NAME: ADDRESS: ~V L. /v1'Y ~~~ PHONE: out, give to the Deputy PLEp,SE NOTE : t Clerk . f i Thank you . ) ~ ~ ~- LANDFILL PETITION ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS We, the undersigned, do adamantly oppose the location of a landfill on Site 9RR (Route 677). Because of the topography, a site developed here will become an economic albatross and an environmental hazard to proportions the State of Virginia has never known (i.e. by-pass problems, erosion control, degradation of a recreation facility, contamination of local wells, enormous cost of road improvements, rerouting surface water, relocating residents). ---------------------------------- ~ ~ ----------------------------- ~~ as 1,~.. ~.~.~ ~ C~~~-~-Q., C~~- ~ ~( << G~ ~ ~ ~ t ~C~ ~ `~ ~t Leo w 1~ ~. ~~~ y ~tz ~ ,~~~ ti, ~_. n n .~ ~L.,~ ~:S- P,--~~ ~, as ~- iv1-c e ~ v~+ auv~s .~ LANDFILL PETITION ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS We, the undersigned, do adamantly oppose the location of a landfill on Site 9RR (Route 677). Because of the topography, a site developed here will become an economic albatross and an environmental hazard to proportions the State of Virginia has never known (i.e. by-pass problems, erosion control, degradation of a recreation facility, contamination of local wells, enormous cost of road improvements, rerouting surface water, relocating residents). --------------------------------------------- ----- ---------------------- -------- ~ ~8'~.3 ~~3~ _ V~ f F ~ 1`, ~I ~, ~~ LANDFILL PETITION :OANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS We, the undersigned, do adamantly oppose the location of a landfill on Site 9RR (Route 677). Because of the topography, a site developed here will-become an economic albatross and an environmental hazard to proportions the State of Virginia has never known (i.e. by-pass problems, erosion control, degradation of a recreation facility, contamination of local wells, enormous cost of road improvements, rerouting surface water, relocating residents). ~n~~/_ ~ ------ ----------- ~ ~ ~ '- ~ , i ~~ ~~~ .~~'~~~ ~, '/~ ~~~~// ('1~.~-cam ~ /~~. r~ T '3 X21 ~.~ ~`~~ /rovr. .~ ~~. SG.~~_~~6! 3~~ S 1~~~~ ~~ ~~ ~~~s~~~, ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ { ~~ LANDFILL PETITION ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD. OF SUPERVISORS --------------------- ~ ~ ~' l~% ~ ~' '' ~. ~ ~~ ~ 7.3/G~ ~2u c .~ ~~ ~~ ~'_ ~, ~,~ l~ '~ , ,._~ ~~z.=x~. ~ ~ ~, 5 - 3~s~ (~~ :Vi`i' -~ ~ We, the undersigned, do adamantly oppose the location of a landfill on Site 9RR (Route 677). Because of the topography, a site developed here will become an economic albatross and an environmental hazard to proportions the State of Virginia has never known (i.e. by-pass problems, erosion control, degradation of a recreation facility, contamination of local wells, enormous cost of road improvements, rerouting surface water, relocating residents). ',u~ ~;~ ' ...~ tic-cc<-f < ~, LANDFILL PETITION ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS We, the undersigned, do adamantly oppose the location of a landfill on Site Because of the topography, a site developed here will become 9RR (Route 677). ortions the State of an economic albatross and an enviroassnproblemsrderosionpcontrol, degradation Virginia has never known (i.e. by-p of a recreation facility, contamination of local wells, enormous cost of road improvements, rerouting surface water, relocating residents). 4 ~ y 1 ;/ ~ ~ ~h~, 790` ~S~/,'~<t L~ ,. (4~1.'Z r~-n~~+:. ~.c:-~~-e ' J fl9i'^ e~~ t' ~.~ ~rr~n~Kr t'c ~i ~, ~~ LANDFILL PETITION ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS We, the undersigned, do adamantly oppose the location of a landfill on Site Because of the topography, a site developed here will become 9RR (Route 677). ro ortions the State of an economic albatross and an enviroassnproblems,derosionpcontrol, degradation Virginia has never known (i.e. by-p of a recreation facility, contamination of local wells, enormous cost of road improvements, rerouting surface water, relocating residents). ~~ ~ /> • t~~ ~ } ~. ~t~ l\-.-^-.- ~` _l ._ '~~ --~ ~ ~ \ ~ ' .. La.__ t 9_.. _ -> G..? _ ~ J(. ~ r _..-... ' r La ~ f y ,~s. ~~ l ~ ~ L f ~~ ~' ~~ '~ r ~,{i/J - X ~~ ~ _ ,, ~ ~~~~ ~ ,~P~ra~~ ~~ ~~ lc~ ~ 9 -~ ~ ~,~~~ L~~~- ~.~33 ~5~- ~ 7 •~ ~/'~/ /~-`-~ " :/~ -r.~. C~G / ~~7 / ~7' -•310.3 ~ (~ ~G-1 ~ ~' q _ ~ ~~...¢.c^--Y~~ ~~G`~-,~ ~'`~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ c~ c~< v ~. <- ~ ~ ~ a ~Q~ 1~ ~ S ) _~/ f ~ ,/ r . ,~ ~~ y.~ _ . ~~ ~~~ ~~d~ ~.iCl ~t~ s ~ ~ ~ s~Y'~ ~ 4~ 0'1 t tr , t6 /~ .1~ ,T~ ~~, ,7yy ~~.,di 7 75~a 7 ~ u < ~ ~ ,~ ~ ~ ,~ ~ i ~ 7~~ n , e ,L-~ ~ ,: ~ ~ f5 ~-~-,_ _ .. ~7h ,3 L~ LANDFILL PETITION ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS We, the undersigned, do adamantly oppose the location of a landfill on Site 9RR (Route 677). Because of the topography, a site develoop~do srthelStatecofe an economic albatross and an environmental hazard to prop radation Virginia has never known (i.e. by-pass problems, erosion control, deg of a recreation facility, contamination of local wells, enormous cost of road improvements, rerouting surface water, relocating residents). - .. ..~~ ~/ ~~ r rc,: ~1 p ']iI C ~ L.U,~IIG~~J ;~j'c~W~ C ~ ~-CL ,~?C~.',fr~s ------ ~-7 ~ -- ~Q '~'~rO ~?y-~~r~ ~~~;%~ h~~r~~ f ~ ~ ~ ~~' ~~ ~;. r i p l~ ~~ ~vLf'~! t o (t'' 9 1 y' f• 9 s 4 / ~ f 'y 3 el J. ~:. ~~ -..- :Z ~ ~ . .. 7 ~ a ~~~4~ ~ ..~~~ v~~~'J / / ~1 / ~'I~ y~~ Y- ~! ~~~ ~~ ~,r.~~G ,,G~so 4/ !4 ~ ,, ~ 2-7 ~ ~ > ~-> ~' ~ ~~, ~'t'tc~ .7 ~ _ ~ v c-rti.sZ ~-v-vnrc 9~~1 ~..~.~ ~ . i ~ ! / ~~ ~ ~, lav A I~.Q r1 Ll~ ~/A tCl~ 1~ Ir i t. t: ~l ~ ~ I ~,y~~~„~... ~ ,.~t r, ~ F ~ ~ ~1 .-- ~ - ~ 3 Ss' S ~~A~-/ ~ wad/ (~~cf ,-~ S ~ ~~~..~ ~ilaN tt ~ ~ -rz c~ ~~ LANDFILL PETITION ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS We, the undersigned, do adamantly oppose the location of a landfill on Site 9RR (Route 677). Because of the topography, a site deYeoloop~do srthelStatecofe an economic albatross and an environmental hazard top P radation Virginia has never known (i.e. by-pass problems, erosion control, deg of a recreation facility, contamination of local wells, enormous cost of road improvements, rerouting surface water, relocating residents). ~ GGU~C ~ yn,.,~,Q,~ ~~, .~ ~a. ,~~. ~~~ ~ ~ , (~~ ~ ~~ j '7 7 4 - Z C.rt (, ~ ~' L y ~l I / ~ A a A v~ . LANDFILL PETITION ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS We, the undersigned, do adamantly oppose the location of a landfill on Site 9RR (Route 677).' Because of the topography, a site developed here will become an economic albatross and an environmental hazard to proportions"the State of Virginia h~tc~ver known (i.e. by-pass problems, erosion control, degradation of a recreation facility, contamination of local wells, enormous cost of road idents) improvements, rerouting 1 ~~t-f ~ 1.11 IU/ /GdI" ~ l' ~ ~ ~ ,i _ r ~~ 3 t ~ Ya ~~~~~ Vit surface water, relocating res - ~7a ~ _ y s ~~ aurz.S ~.- ('ct` ~~~ a~ ~-~ . tt-..e.. ~~ ~< <, l~3r~'' s..r~ir, •~ ~~ ~ l'7nDK;/ti~' 'ins 5 „~~ i 1,c~ ~ = ate. ~ ` . ~~ LANDFILL PETITION ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS We, the undersigned, do adamantly oppose the location of a landfill on Site 9RR (Route 677). Because of the topography, a site develOp~d nsrthelStatecofe an economic albatross and an enviroassntroblems,derosionpcontrol, degradation Virginia has never known (i.e. by-p P of a recreation facility, contamination of local wells, enormous cost of road improvements, rerouting surface water, relocating residents). ~j -- -------------------------V_- ~--- - --- --------- n A i3 _ *1'7 ~' 77 ~' ~ ~ 1~ -~1 ,~' ,. . ~~~~ rl /`. J7 J _~~ ~- ~-:.~ s ,, ~~- ~'~ ~~ ;. :~,~~~ ~7 ~" `~~~ ~~oES~ . ~Sfy~7~•~i ~~ a / ~.~e' ~~ ~~-~s-~ ~ ~ ~~~i% ~'1~~ s ~ ~^G Vii ~ ~~ i/ J ,. , ~ ,.~ ~ ~~~~. , ;f - -,~ - ~----, ~ ~ x ,, 7~y i Y~7 ~~ - ~~`~~ f 4 J, t ! LJ LANDFILL PETITION ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS location of a landfillite We, the undersigned, do adamantly oppose the 9RR (Route 677). Because of the topography, a site developed here will become an economic albatross and an environmental hazard to proportions the State of Virginia has never known (i.e. by-pass problems, erosion control, degradation of a recreation facility, contamination of local wells, enormous cost of road improvements, rerouting surface water, relocating residents). ~G~1~~'-~=--------------------- - --------- - • ~~ . ~ot,.~ss. H..~ ~ LANDFILL PETITION ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS We, the undersigned, do adamantly oppose the location of a landfill on Site 9RR (Route 677). Because of the topography, a site developed here will become an economic albatross and an environmental hazard to proportions the State of Virginia has never known (i.e. by-pass problems, erosion control, degradation of a recreation facility, contamination of local wells, enormous cost of road improvements, rerouting surface water, relocating residents). ~~ ~~ g y ~~1~~:.x.~e ~ , V~ ~~~~..,,'~,,-nn=''-l JV v~wJ~ r~ ~~.a~~ LANDFILL PETS N ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS do adamantly oppose the location of a ed herelwillSbecome We, the undersigned, o ra h a site develop 9RR (Route 677). Because of the top g p y' ro ortions the State of erosion control, degradation an economic albatross and an enviroassnproblems,d to p Virginia has never known (i•e• by-p recreation facility, contamination of local wells, enormous cost of roa of a relocating residents). -- ~)j; ~~ improvements, rerouting surface water, --------------~ ~~ h ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~~ ~ o~~ ~ ` `~ D ~ ~ ~i -X ~ ~ r,, l j~~~ nc' S t ' t' 1 a Air ~ ~ ~.~ C ~/.C~ r n ,> i~.-a _~ J ~ GL ~'~' "~`~ " `,~~~ .tom 7/~ ~ .A, ~~,,~ ~ ~. tea ~.c ~f~~ ~~ -~ :~ C~ ~ T ~~r ~ LANDFILL PETITION ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS We, the undersigned, do adamantly oppose the location of a landfill on Site 9RR (Route 677).` Because of the topography, a site developed here will become an economic albatross and an environmental hazard to proportions the State of Virginia has never known (i.e. by-pass problems, erosion control, degradation of a recreation facility, contamination of local wells, enormous cost of road improvements, rerouting surface water, relocating residents). ~~. , g~1it,, ~sn .nom , ~ ~3f , X1'1 ~,n.Q.~ l~~ ~-~i a-~ ~G. `~ ,t~, ,},G ~ Q~/~~leJ /cam U/~ ~S~o~ S, 11~~~ ~~~~,~`,_ ~- /~ ~ S~fSC ~~'~AdJ %~J/-} /~E.~ r~1~ fie (i'J~ ~ fCJ~' ~Z F~k.or ~; d t 1 zK ai~~ a. a.4v/ y ~'"' -ti ~ t E ~ ~ ~ ~, ~ 1 '~~ LANDFILL PETITION ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ~> ~. We, the undersigned, do adamantly oppose the location of a landfill on Site 9RR (Route 677).' Because of the topography, a site developed here will become an economic albatross and an environmental hazard to proportions 'the State of Virginia has never known (i.e. by-pass problems, erosion control, degradation of a recreation facility, contamination of local wells, enormous cost of road improvements, rerouting surface water, relocating residents). ~'~~~z~ 3 %~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~'G (~~ ,,.+4 ~ Lam. c~.oc~'if',~~ ~ ~v e, y~ a~o~s1 /7~~ .2 ~ ,; ~ ~ .,. ~_ ~~ )~ci - -- ~ - ~, ~Y•~ . ~ t,+~31 .~ ~r.~ ~ ~" • Jam?/~r~_~..----- ~~-~ ~ c' S`2 4 ~ f~. ~9 kr f/fn~il l~ -" ~~ Ania'/r'Q ~A__~~~ - ,~ ---T- v~~~ LANDFILL PETITION ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS We, the undersigned, do adamantly oppose the location of a landfill on Site 9RR (Route 677). Because of the topography, a site developed here will be~~ome an economic albatross and a.n environmental hazard to proportions the State of Virginia has never known (i.e. by-pass problems, erosion control, degradation of a recreation facility, contamination of local wells, enormous cost of road improvements, rerouting surface water, relocating residents). ~ - n ~„ ~ J ~ i J 3 ~, `~ 1 _ ~ '~ -`{- d ~' ~1~ ` i Z~~ ~ n ~ ~ ,~ ~; ~~ '='~ , l.< r G ;~ i ~'~/ G G~ V ~- ~ ~_ ~ 1.,.------ N 1 ,~. LANDFILL PETITION ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ned, do adamantly oppose the location of a landfill on Site We, the undersig h a site developed here will become 9RR (Route 677). Because of the topograp y, ortions the State of an economic albatross and an enviroassntroblems,derosionpcontrol, degradation Virginia has never known (i.e. by-p P of a recreation facility, contamination of local wells, enormous cost of road improvements, rerouting surface water, relocating residents). /_ .) ~~~ j Ir ,~. (- `~ fir-, I {~ ~ ;~ ~ X (`~ 9 ~~`~1 <> ,~'~l ~ ,~' ~ -~ ~.1 - .,,~ 7 9 , < ---Phone ~- ~i'~`1 ° 9Q i `( ct8c:~,. ~i..l~ ~c,. ~ ~ ~ CA~1 ~s ~ ~ ~'~y" ~, - ~ ~.~' ~t . ~ ~ . ~~ c o~ j y~ . ~6 ~s Vie. ~ y ~ n ~ ~~z ~,,.:~_ . ,~~; ~~ I( ~/ Q ~.` ~~ ~C ~ n~ /~ ~~ /, 5 G~~~i~?.2c qtr ,~ !.~ ?~ ~ ,1 •„ - ~- , ~ ~ r ,~ ,} . ~ ~~~" niFi~k' n ~~ ~; R~~m 117 ,, ~~ ~~ l~ ~i !~ '` ~ ~ tc t ~ ,, ,f ~, 53 a ~~3-8`~S~ ~ W ~. C ~~i ~~~~~ ,11;1 , - i ., _ ~ LANDFILL PETITION ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS We, the undersigned, do adamantly oppose the location of a landfill on Site 9RR (Route 677). Because of the topography, a site develoop~d nsrthe1Statecofe an economic albatross and an environmental hazard to prop Virginia has never known (i.e. by-pass problems, erosion control, degradation of a recreation facility, contamination of local wells, enormous cost of road improvements, rerouting surface water, relocating residents). luau (C~2~.~t " ~ ~-~:~~~ ~3~`'s, ~, f~ i~ f i ~ ~~~C~2t,'~ ~.,~ ;. ~, ~, ~-- />>ioJ iL C r ~' r ~.-. ~_ ;~ - , t ~ j[1 a 3 .~.~ Lr. ~ ,~ f £ "' y~~ ~~ ! "/lam ~, ,~;y:... .+~ ~% f I i ~ _~ '' + ~~ ~~ -~ , ~yr~.' %1 iii Flo.? , d5' ~~~a ~ ~ ~a r ~ ~, .. ~:~_ ~~ t 4 e ~~ } r t t~ ,. '' ~ '. ~yG I~~' G ~c ' ~ ~r~ 3i~~~ ~~ ~k~~ 2ci' ~. ~~ ~t~nv ~ . ~-~T" 'rim-s.=`3-~A., ` .~ F ~- ~ , 1 ~~~ ~ „ r r t r~ L~~. i. -"r, ~~ :-C S~' ' ", i ,~ ' ~ ~'' - .l : ~i _ ~ ~ ~ :-'~ '~-,' j 1 ~-~ ~ L~+ ~ ~ "~ ~ lid' ~'~~4z::_ r~.,...... ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~-~-'~ ~~~ ~~~-, L `~ ~ -~/ / ., -7' ; ~ ~~ an ,a (~' ~~'~ <' v~ _, lJ?~ rZ1 ~ ~.! .-G`~.e.....~' '~--- ~ : t ~[ 1~ LANDFILL PETITION ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS We, the undersigned, do adamantly oppose the location of a landfill on Site 9RR (Route 677). Because of the topography, a site develoop~do srthe1Statecofe an economic albatross and an enviroassnproblems,derosionpcontrol, degradation Virginia has never known (i.e. by-p of a recreation facility, contamination of local wells, enormous cost of road improvements, rerouting surface water, relocating residents). ~•,yyyy _~Ll~ ;~%(,.r ~ ~~/'` rVti.. Sri. bii?? ~ ~,--~z i2 `i%L~ ~-'~ ~i ( ~-------` } r ~~ r ~ i,.r.t-z-~ .,~ -~ ~ c ~~. ~ ~ ~ / / ~. _ _ ,// / l r ~ / _~ ,~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .1 ~ '.`. ~ `_' _ ~ur~ ~~lC k~.G~ <, c~tt.~ . t, ~~ ~ /1 ~ ~ 7 ~'i '~ t~i~ iY 1 i i~'/tom t ~; ~' /lpr^~~,(~`~c,~( ~t ~` ~ ~ru~~ l LANDFILL PETITION ~~ We, the undersigned, do adamantly oppose the location of a landfill on Site 9RR (Route 677). Because of the topography, a site developed here will become an economic albatross and an environmental hazard to proportions the State of Virginia has never known (i.e. by-pass problems, erosion control, degradation of a recreation facility, contamination of local wells, enormous cost of road ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS improvements, rerouting surface water, relocatin residents). ~~~~~. 4~h~P~ ~b ~7??;~, j~, ~; E~_xt..~ ~~~ ~~ ~x .-.~ i/ ~~.. ELF/;v~t,,~ ~ o F ~. ~~ ~ ~ ~~~ ;~'~ ~~c~ ` 7'~ Yi ~..~ ~~~ ~ ~ LANDFILL PETITION ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS We, the undersigned, do adamantly oppose the location of a landfill on Site 9RR (Route 677). Because of the topography, a site developed here will become an economic albatross and an environmental hazard to proportions the State of Virginia has never known (i.e. by-pass problems, erosion control, degradation of a recreation facility, contamination of local wells, enormous cost of road improvements, rerouting surface water, relocating residents). --~-- --------------------------.~~c~~~-----------------------~~c ~ --- t~ ~ ~ V v ~ ll~~ I A ~; l ~ ~l//l ~ / ~r ~~%~17 ~.5 ~~ ~/~ ~1~~~G~'4'l ,Yr. ~..~ ~/ ~O~ / ~ / ~- L. ,~~,v=~~ ~,~: ~ l,~ ~ POANp~ o F ~ ~ Z A ~ ~ O 2 J a 1838 '.E50) -1988 S~SQVICENTENN~P~ 1 Bututi~ulBeGirtrrin~ COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C HODGE September 28, 1988 Bishop Wayne ~I. Ayers Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints 332 Daladier Drive Vinton, Virginia 24019 Dear Bishop Ayers: LE F_ GARRETT. CHAIRMAN ',>tIN L~SCJR r11 L1_y MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT R IC HAR`J W. ROBERS. VICE-CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGIS TE RIA~ DISTRICT BOB L JOHNSON 1-~.iJ~LINS M4GI5 TE RINL DISTRICT STEVEN A. MCGRAw LATl~.a'[i~: MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C.NICKENS v:P.TgN MAGiS7F RIAL DIS TRICT Oi~ behalf of the Board of Supervisors, I would like to take this opportunity to let you know of our appreciation for your attending the meeting on Tuesday, September 27, 1988 to offer the invocation. We feel it is most important to ask God's blessing on t;iese meetings so that all is done according to His will and for the good of all citizens. Thank you again for sharing your time with us. bjh ~DUITt~ Af '~~i1~tXiA~iF BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Very ~ru1y yours, ~~! ~ 1 ~ ~- Le Garrett, Chairman Ro noke County Board of Supervisors PO. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24018-0798 (703) 772-2004 ~~.- ~ ~- ~~~' ~~g __ ~ - ~ ~ ~~ a ~n,~,p ROLIDq y INN TgNGLE 20 ar a3ss starker R~~OD ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24014 Ca NEB aRGESS-WILEY Manager !~ Owned & Operated by C 8 8 Associates, (703 ~ l~j Inc. ) 774-4400 ~~ l ECG 5 ~~ ,~,„-' ~y ~ ~~~ ~ ~, cam- /~~ ~ '~~-~---, ~~~ - ~2,~ ~, - ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~._, ~1~ ~~ - ~~ ~ / ~ -- -- 1. Information Report on removal action at Dixie Caverns Landfill. CLIFF CRAIG PRESENTED UPDATE - WILL BRING BACK REPORT ON ADDITIONAL, COSTS TO FINISH REMOVAL ACTION 2. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance 3. General Fund Unappropriated Balance 4. Board Contingency Fund 5. Accounts Paid for July 1988 6. Accounts Paid for August 1988 M. CITIZEN COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS 1. David A. Steger requesting an increase in the minimum lot size in the Catawba Valley. HCN DIRECTEDEYLANNIRURAL PRESERVED ANDSINCREASEEMIN`IMUM LOTNSIZE. CATAWBA VALL 4:20 PM - 5 MINUTE RECESS 1. Ordinance authorizing the purchase of 0.518 acres from Smithsub, Inc. for the relocation of Kenworth Road - Valleypointe, Phase I. 0-91388-6 HCN/BLJ TO APPROVE ORD. AYES-BLJ, RR, HCN, LG ABSTAIN-SAM 2. Ordinance authorizing the acquisition of easements to facilitate the extension of public sewer service to the Appalachian Power Company Service Center. 0-91388-7 HCN/BLJ TO APPROVE ORD AYES-BLJ, RR, HCN, LG ABSTAIN-SAM I. APPOINTMENTS 1. Building Code Board of Adjustments and Appeals. 2. Community Corrections Resources Board 3. Court Service Unit Advisory Council/Youth and Family Services Advisory Board 4. Grievance Panel 5. Mental Health Services of the Roanoke Valley, Community Services Board. J. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS MCGRAW ADVISED THAT HE WILL NOT MAKE ANY DECISION ON A LANDFILL SITE NOR LOBBY TO KEEP A SITE FROM ANY AREA UNTIL ALL FACTS ARE AVAILABLE. JOHNSON ASKED THAT PUBLIC BE INFORMED THAT FORMAL ACTION WILL BE TAKEN TO BE RIGHT OF ENTRY TO PROPOSED LANDFILL SITES AT SEPT. 27TH MEETING. NICKENS ADVISED HE WILL NOT VOTE UNTIL ALL THREE CONDITIONS OF THE LANDFILL BOARD ARE MET. K. ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED 3 OF ~OANC~F h, . ~` L 2 77 ~ f7 O ~ ai 18 rE50 88 s~sQUlCENTENN~P~ A 6cauu~ul[3eginnin~ COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE Bishop Wayne >~I, Ayers Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints 322 Daladier Drive Vinton, Virginia 24019 Dear Bishop Ayers: On behalf of the Board of you for giving the invocationSupervisors meeting in the at I would like to past, the Board of Supervisohrsk We would again like to on Tuesday, September 27, call on to do this, please 1988' at 3y00 to present the invocation will be callin Call me at 772-2005, p-m' If You are unable You, or if g you soon to Someone from this you would see if this time is office prefer another date, acceptable to The Board members and they appreciate are aware of how blessing at their m y°gs•volunteerin busy your schedule eetin g the time to offer Godss Sincerely, H. Allen Deputy Clerk bjh 3~ ~. C2nunf~ of i~attnnkr BOARD OF SUPERVISORS LEE GARRETT, CHAIRMAN WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT RICHARp VV ROBERS. VICE-CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT STEVEN A. MCGRAW CATgyygA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT June HARRY C. NICKENS 2 / 19 8 8 VIN TON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24018-O7g8 ~7 03) 772-2004 2. Proposed legislative package BLJ REQUESTED RESOLUTION OF SUPPORT AT 9/27 MEETING FOR HOUSE JOINT RESOLUTION 63 THAT JOINT SUBCOMMITTEE STUDY WAYS TO PROVIDE LOW COST HEALTH CARE COVERAGE FOR SCHOOL EMPLOYEES SEVERAL ITEMS ADDED - PMM TO ADD REQUESTS AND BRING BACK ON 9/27 0. EXECUTIVE ``~~SION pursuant to the Code of Virginia Section 2.; '~14 (a) NONE P. ADJOURNMENT - BLJ/SAM - UW AT 7:03 P.M. 5 COMMITTEE VACANCIES IN 1988 JA- Nay Social Services Board (Welfare) Four year term of William P. expire 1/1/88. Broderick, Chairman, will Trans ortation and Safet Commission Three year terms of Charlotte Lichtensteino Trenor, Hollins District, Johnson ~ Windsor Hills District, and May Cave Spring District, will expire 1/1/88, Buildin Code Board of Ad;,,~~,,,,._~_ _ ------- ~aiu tj Four year term of Norman Eugene Jarrett, District will expire 1/22/88. FEB---~ y Grievance Panel als Hollins Two year term of Joe W. Himes will expire 2/23/88. MARCH Court Service Unit Adviso Services Advisor Board Council/Youth and Fam;i, Two year terms of Gerald Roger Smith, Catawba Districtlss' Catawba District, Hollins District, Dr. J. AndrewMArcher Morehead, District, Sherry Robison, Windsor Hills Dist~ict w' expire 3/22/88. ill One year term of Tracy Rothschild Cave Spring, will expire 3/22 88.' youth member from Two year term. of judicial appointment Todd Turner w' expire 3/21/88. ill League of Older Americans One year term of Webb Johnson, County Representativ will expire 3/31/88. e, APRIL Buildin Code Board of Ad 'ustments and ~A peals Four year term of B. J. King, Windsor Hills District, will expire 4/13/88. Four year term of Thomas A. Darnall, Vinton District, will expire 4/27/88. JUNE Fifth Planning District Commission Three year term of Lee B. Eddy, Citizen Representative, will expire 6/30/88. Parks & Recreation Advisory Commission Three year terms of Kenneth D. Bowen, Catawba District, Yvonne Willis, Catawba District, James Bryant, Hollins District, Paul D. Bailey, Windsor Hills District, and Roger L. Falls, Vinton District, will expire 6/30/88. Roanoke County School Board - A ointed by School Board Selection Committee -- Four year term of Paul Black, Hollins District, will expire 6/30/88. JULY Social Services Board (Welfare) Four year term of Betty Jo Anthony will expire 7/19/88. Roanoke Valley Regional Solid Waster Management Board Four year terms of Howard R. Keister, Jr., County Representative, and John H. Parrott, Chairman, City Representative, will expire 7/31/88. AUGUST Community Corrections Resources Board One year terms of Bernard Hairston, and Edmund J. Kielty, Alternate, will expire 8/13/88. SEPTEMBER Grievance Panel Two year term of Thomas T. Palmer will expire 9/10/88. Industrial Development Authority 2 Four year term of Tom Isenhart, Catawba District, will expire 9/26/88. OCTOBER Grievance Panel Three year term of Cecil Hill, Alternate, will expire 10/12/88. Mental Health Services of the Roanoke Valley, Community Services Board Two year term of Dr. Joseph Duetsch, Member at Large, will expire 10/31/88. NOVEMBER Court Service Unit Advisory Council/Youth and Family Services Advisory Board One year terms of Cassidee R. Nickens, youth member from William Byrd, and Molly Eller, youth member from Glenvar High, will expire 11/13/88. DECEMBER Library Board Four year term of Carolyn Pence, Vinton District, will expire 12/31/88. Mental Health SErvices of the Roanoke Valley, Community Services Board Three year term of Barbara Higgins, County appointee, will expire 12/31/88. Roanoke County Planning Commission Four year term of Michael J. Gordon, Windsor Hills District, will expire 12/31/88. 3 PETITIONER'S REQUEST 788-9 Petition of CBL Management, Inc requesting rezoning from M-1, Industrial to B-2, Business of a tract containing 4.13 acres, to construct a ~~`~~ shopping center, located on the west side of ~C ~ ''y)~y Merriman Road (Route 613) approximately 100 feet c--~+~ t{ ~ south of Starkey Road (Route 904) in the Cave L Spring Magisterial District. ~~~~ .J RR/BLJ TO CONTINUE FOR SIXTY DAYS (9/27/88) FOR STAFF TO STUDY POTENTIAL IMPACT OF ROAD CHANGE. BLJ REQUEST STAFF REPORT ON NUMBER OF M-1 ZONINGS IN THE COUNTY AND THE IMPACTS OF CHANGING M-1 TO B2 ZONING (INCLUDING TAX IMPACT) 788-10 Public Hearing on the adoption of a resolution requesting the Circuit Court of Roanoke County to enter an order to hold a referendum on the question of changing the method of selection of members of the County School Board, as provided in Section 22.1-42 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended. 5 CITIZENS SPOKE SAM/RR TO VOTE ON ISSUE ON 8/9/88 URC N. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance accepting an offer and authorizing conveyance of a right-of-way and easement to Appalachian Power Company for Green Hill Park. HCN/SAM TO APPROVE 1ST READING 2ND READING - 8/9/88 - URC 2. Ordinance accepting an offer and authorizing conveyance of an easement to Appalachian Power Company at the Fire and Rescue Training Center. HCN/SAM TO APPROVE 1ST READING 2ND READING - 8/9/88 - URC 0. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance amending and reenacting Chapter 5, Animals and Fowl, of the Roanoke County Code concerning the licensing of dogs and rabies control. 7