Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2/28/1989 - Regular' OF POAN~"~F ~ L 2 ~ A ~ ~ a? V~~ ~ ~n~ ,~~ ~ rt 18 :~ 88 ~ ~i~ Q~/lCENTENN~P ~ A Btauti~ulBcRinnin~ ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ~~ ACTION AGENDA ~. FEBRUARY 28, 1989 Welcome to the meetin ROanoke County Board of gs are held on the second Tuesda Supervisors meetin p•m- Public Hearings will y and the fourth TuesdaRe of each month. be heard 9ular Deviations from this at x•00 p'm °n the fou y at 3=00 schedule will be announceduesday A• OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M, ) 1. 2. 3. B. Roll Call. ALL PRESENT Invocation: The Reverend Coopers Cove Bam Crews ptist Church Pledge of Alle glance to the United States Flag. ~4UESTS TO POSTPONE ADDS OR C~NGE THE ITEMS. ORDER OF AGENDA ADD ITEM D-'7 ; gy~~D OF BID FOR SH 289-2 ORT TERM BORROWING - CONTINUED TO 3/28/89 AT PETITIONER'S RE C• PROCLAMATIONS Q~ST ~ RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS AND AWARDS 1• Resolution of A retirement frompp1e~ont Airlines Whittaker u R-2288 pon his HCN/BLJ TO URC - ., -,-_ . APPROVE D- NEW BUSINESS 1• Presentation Excellence offrom the Citizens for consolidation petitions for the Governmental of Roanoke Count prop°sed PETITTONS'PRES Y and Roanoke City. 5 PEOPLE SPOKEE~ED BY P`~RTICIPATING OR _ GANIZATIONS 2. -22 -2 HCN/BLJ TOcApPROVE RESO URC 3• Request"~rom the funds for Primar Registrar for an appropriation of Y Election. A-2288 - HCN/BLJ TO AppROVE URC 4• Rescheduling of June 13 14, 1989, because of Primar89 meeting date to y Election. June R-22889-4 BLJ/RR TO APPROVE RESO URC S• ...Authorization y sewer project for the Highfields/Lakeland RoadtAr A-22889-5 ea. LG/HCN TO APPROVE STAFF I2ECONIl~NDATION URC 6• _ Authorization to initiate a water Old Hollins Road Area. Project for the A-2288Q-6 BLJ/SAM TO APPROVE STAFF RECOMMEND URC ATION ~• Award of Bid for $9 Million Revenue An Notes tlcipation R-22889-7 HCN/SAN! TO APPROVE RESO AYES - BLJ, RR, SAM, HCN ABSTAIN-LG E• REQUEST FOR WORK SESSIONS SAM REQUESTED WO ECH ANNOUNCED RK SESSION ON RECYCLING ON ECH ANNO~CED WpINT WORK SESSION WITH SCHOOL BO-89 AT 7• RK SESSION •30 p'M, WITH FIRE CHIEFS AT ~OAP•M•P•M• 3-14-gg RR/SAM THAT CITIZENS ADVISORY 3-14-89 PROJECT IF COMMITTEE COMMITTEE BE INVOL~D IN SHALL INFORM Bp~D MEMEMBERS ARE WILLING TO RECYCLING __-__ MBERS AND NEW AppOINTMENTNCAN BE IF NOT, MEMBERS _- MADE - URC APProval of 1989-90 Regional Airport Commis Budget. lion 2 F• MEQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS t NONE G • APPOINTMENTS NONE l • Communit Y Corrections Resources Board 2• League of Older Americans Advisory Board 3• Transportation and Safet y Commission 4• Court Service Unit Advisor Family Services Advisor Y Council/Youth and Y Board H• MEPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS NONE I • CONSENT-,AGENDA ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSIDERED By THE BO CONSENT A E~jA ARE ENACTED By OME ARD TO BE ROUTINE BELOW. MESOLUTION IN T AND WILL BE IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED FORM OR FORMS LISTED REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA ~ THAT ITEM WILL BE SEPA~TELY. AND WILL BE CONSIDERED HCN/RR TO APPROVE WITH ITEM $2 REMOVED URC R-22889- l• Confirmation Service °f Committee Appointment to Unit Advisory Council/Youth and Familyourt Services Advisory Board A-2288°-8 a 2• APP~e~el-a€-Ra€€le-permit-tar- dapeees- the-Eetre-Sprt~g 3 TILED UNTIL PMM STUDIES LEGALITIES 3• Adoption of Resolution of A Honorable Jack B. Coulter Ppreciation to the ~ Judicial Circuit. ~ Judge of the 23rd R-22889-8 4• Authorization to , Power Company, grant 40 easement to A ppalachian A-2288 -g 5• Acceptance of a dedicated b 10-foot water line easement being y Dominion Bank. A-22889-8•d 6• Request for acceptance of Huntridge Road a Britany Road in the Va. nd Transportation Secondar Department of R-22889-8.e Y System. ~• Request for acceptance of Kildeer circle Falcon Ridge Road into the Va. and Transportation Secondar Department of R-2288 Y System. -8 f 8• Acceptance of water and sewer facilities s Section No. 2, Huntridge erving A-2288 -g q A-22889-8.h A-2288 -8 i 9. 10. Acknowledgment from the Virginia Department of Transportation that the followin accepted into the Secondar g roads have been a• 0.11 miles of Fox RidyeSYstem: b• 0.40 miles of Peregri~e C~est Circle c• 0.25 miles of Fox Ridge Road d• 0.15 miles of Silver Fox Road Acceptance of sewer facilities serving White Subdivision. 11. Acceptance of a _ donated b sanitary sewer easement being --- ___ Y Velma G. Edwards • A-2288 -8 -_- -- - 4 J• CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS NONE K• REPORTS HCN/SAM TO RECEIVE AND FILE URC 1• Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance 2• General Fund Unappropriated Balance 3• Board Contingency Fund 4• Accounts Paid - January 1989 5• Income Analysis and Statement of Expenditures as of January 31, 1989. L• WORK SESSIONS 1- Joint Work Session with Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission. LG/SAM TO APPROVE STAFF RECOMMENDATION TO BRING BACK P REC COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS FOR APPROVAL ARKS AND - URC M. EXECUTIVE SESSION pursuant to the Code of Vir ini Section 2.1-344 g a NONE RECESS AT 5:20 P•M, EVENING SESSION x:00 p.M. N• NEW BUSINESS (CONTINUED FROM 3:00 P•M•~ S l• Final recommendations on p A-2288~~ roposed Landfill Sites. RR/SAM TOiAPPROVE STAFF BOONES CHAPEL SITE MECOMI'~NDATION FOR BRADSIiAW ROAD SITE AND LG ANNOUNCED URC CITIZENS ON MEETING WITH CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE MARCH 7, lg_gg_ AND INTERESTED O. 289-2 CONTINUED TO 3/28/89 289-3 RR/SAM TO DENY URC 289-4 BLJ/SAM TO APPROVE WITH PROFFERS URC 289-5 Petition of -acre tract fromtgal Fidelit Bank Inc. to construct a 2 and B-3, Business tooBr2zone a 1.02 the Cave S bank, located at 4143 FranklinBRoadein pring Magisterial District. RR/BLJ TO APPROVE WITH PROFFERS AYES-BLJ, R.R, S~~ HCN ABSTAIN-LG 289-6 Petition tract fromfREekas Hom s, Inc. to rezone a Residential Estates 3.75 acre located at the northeast corner of to M-2 `_y , Industrial, the intersection of PUBLIC HEARINGS (289_1 WAS HEARD ON FEBRUARY l4, 1989) Petition 2.92 acre of ~~oltz and R N RraAl tract from R 1, Residential to rezone a Residential to construct multifamily residences located at 3464 Chaparral Drive in the Cave S rin Magisterial District. P g Petition of William and Provided for Permit to oCatherine Fortune for a kennel in addition to a Pesidencedon a 5.45 a Use Not located at 5647 Lowland Lane in the g and cat boarding Magisterial District, cre tract Cave Spring Petition of J. Edward Conner to rezone an a 1.2 acre tract from B- B-2, Business to construBtsanrestaurdantl 1 pproximate south side of Peters Creek Road Residential to intersection with South Drive 280 feet weekeof oitshe Magisterial District, in the Hollins 6 16th Street Magisterial SAM/LG TO AppROVE WITH PROFFERS AYES-BLJ, RR, SAM, LG NAYS-HCN 289-7 LG/RR WITH URC TO APPROVE PROFFERS tract 289-8 Petition of Lin rezone a 2. erfelt DeVelo ment Cor oration to 768 acre tract from M-2, Industrial to M-1, Industrial and obtain a S related commercial uses to ebecomexception Permit for located on the north side Part of Valle west of its intersection with KPetershCreek Rog feetnte, Hollins Magisterial District. ad in the HCN/RR TO APPROVE WITH PROFFERS AYES-BLJ, RR, HCN, LG ABSTAIN-SAM 289-9 Petition of Roanoke Count Board of rezone a 1.03 acre tract from M- Su ervisors to Business to construct a 1. Industrial to B_1~ Planning Commission reviewsofe squad buildin proposed rescue s the compatibilgtand for Plan, located at tghedsoutheast cornered fomprehensive Valley Forge Avenues in the Cave Brambleton and District. Spring Magisterial HCN/SAM TO APPROVE URC P- FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES l• Ordinance amendin TelPphon g Section 21-4 (a), Enhanced Emer enc Coun-~~-'X' °f Chapter 21 Y Code reducin ~ Taxa ion, of the Roanoke telephone service to fundttheoEgpZrEmereenof System, local g cY Telephone BLJ/RR TO APPROVE 1ST READING 2ND & PUBLIC HEARING - 3/14/89 and Carlisle Avenue in the Vinton District. Petition~of William Maas to amend the proffere conditions dated November 17, 1987 on a to construct d assembly and sell wooden 0'56 acre equipment located at 3639 Brambleton Avenueginund Windsor Hills Magisterial District. the 7 URC 2- Ordinance accepting-an offer for and authorizin sale and conveyance of surplus real estate - welltlot ~. on Route 633, Benois Road. HCN/LG TO APPROVE 1ST READING 2ND - 3/14/89 - URC ,. 3• Ordinance authorizing the conveyance of a right-of-w and easement to Appalachian Power Company, ay HCN/BLJ TO APPRp~ 1ST RENDING 2ND - 3/14/$8 - URC 4• Ordinance amending and reenactin of tax• amount of the Roanoke CountycCode to-151, Lem for the taxation of food that is sold for off pp~emases consumption- LG/RR TO APPROVE 1ST READING 2ND AND PUBLIC HEARING - 3/14/89 URC Q- SECOND REAPING OF ORDINANCES R- CITIZENS' COD~NTS AND COMMUNICATIONS S- ADJOURNMENT BLJ/HCN AT 9:05 P•M. URC 8 OF PCANU~F ~ •~ Z A 7 _~ a ~~ ~~~~ SFSQUICENTENN~P~' A Beau~i~ulBeginninK ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA FEBRUARY 28, 1989 Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meeting. Regular meetings are held on the second Tuesday and the fourth Tuesday at 3:00 P.m. Public Hearings will be heard at 7:00 p.m on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.) 1. Roll Call. 2. Invocation: The Reverend Louis E. Carson Cave Spring United Methodist Church 3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag. B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS. C. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS AND AWARDS 1. Resolution of Appreciation to Art Whittaker upon his retirement from Piedmont Airlines D. NEW BUSINESS 1. Presentation from the Citizens for Governmental Excellence of petitions for the proposed consolidation of Roanoke County and Roanoke City. 2• Approval of 1989-90 Regional Airport Commission Budget. 3. Request from the Registrar for an appropriation of funds for Primary Election. 4. Rescheduling of June 13, 1989 meeting date to June 14, 1989, because of Primary Election. 5. Authorization to initiate a sanitary sewer project for the Highfields/Lakeland Road Area. 6. Authorization to initiate a water project for the Old Hollins Road Area. E. REQUEST FOR WORK SESSIONS F. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS G • APPOINTMENTS 1. Community Corrections Resources Board 2. League of Older Americans Advisory Board 3. Transportation and Safety Commission 4. Court Service Unit Advisory Council/Youth and Family Services Advisory Board H. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS I. CONSENT AGENDA ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY. 1. Confirmation of Committee Appointment to the Court Service Unit Advisory Council/Youth and Family Services Advisory Board 2• Approval of Raffle Permit for the Cave Spring Jaycees. 2 3. Adoption of Resolution of Appreciation to the Honorable Jack B. Coulter, Judge of the 23rd Judicial Circuit. 4. Authorization to grant 40' easement to Appalachian Power Company. 5. Acceptance of a 10-foot water line easement being dedicated by Dominion Bank. 6. Request for acceptance of Huntridge Road and Britany Road in the Va. Department of Transportation Secondary System. 7. Request for acceptance of Kildeer circle and Falcon Ridge Road into the Va. Department of Transportation Secondary System. 8. Acceptance of water and sewer facilities serving Section No. 2, Huntridge 9. Acknowledgment from the Virginia Department of Transportation that the following roads have been accepted into the Secondary System: a. 0.11 miles of Fox Ridge Road b. 0.40 miles of Peregrine Crest Circle c. 0.25 miles of Fox Ridge Road d. 0.15 miles of Silver Fox Road 10. Acceptance of sewer facilities serving White Subdivision. 11. Acceptance of a sanitary sewer easement being donated by Velma G. Edwards. J• CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS 1. Karen Sumner to address proposed building and safety concerns at Winterberry Pointe. 2. Melvin T. Patrick to address safety concerns within Winterberry Pointe. K. REPORTS 1. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance 2. General Fund Unappropriated Balance 3 3. Board Contingency Fund 4. Accounts Paid - January 1989 5. Income Analysis and Statement of Expenditures as of January 31, 1989. L. WORK SESSIONS 1. Joint Work Session with Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission. M. EXECUTIVE SESSION pursuant to the Code of Virginia Section 2.1-344 EVENING SESSION (7.00 P M ) N. NEW BUSINESS (CONTINUED FROM 3:00 P.M.) 1. Final recommendations on Proposed Landfill Sites. O. PUBLIC HEARINGS (289-1 WAS HEARD ON FEBRUARY 14, 1989) 289-2 Petition of J. L. Woltz and R. N. Bradle to rezone a 2.92 acre tract from R-1, Residential to R-3, Residential to construct multifamily residences, located at 3464 Chaparral Drive in the Cave Spring Magisterial District. 289-3 Petition of William and Catherine Fortune for a Use Not Provided for Permit to operate a dog and cat boarding kennel in addition to a residence on a 5.45 acre tract located at 5647 Lowland Lane in the Cave Spring Magisterial District. 289-4 Petition of J. Edward Conner to rezone an approximate 1.2 acre tract from B-1 Business and R-1 Residential to B-2, Business to construct a restaurant, located on the south side of Peters Creek Road, 280 feet week of its intersection with South Drive in the Hollins Magisterial District. 289-5 Petition of Central Fidelity Bank Inc to rezone a 1.02 acre tract from B-2 and B-3, Business to B-2 Business to construct a bank, located at 4143 Franklin Road in the Cave Spring Magisterial District. 4 289-6 Petition of Fekas Homes, Inc. to rezone a 3.75 acre tract from RE, Residential Estates to M-2, Industrial, located at the northeast corner of the intersection of 16th Street and Carlisle Avenue in the Vinton Magisterial District. 289-7 Petition of William Maas to amend the proffered conditions dated November 17, 1987 on a 0.56 acre tract to construct, assembly and sell wooden playground equipment located at 3639 Brambleton Avenue in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District. 289-8 Petition of Linaerfelt Development rporation to rezone a 2.768 acre tract from M-2, Industrial to M-1, Industrial and obtain a Special Exception Permit for related commercial uses to become part of Valleypointe, located on the north side of Kenworth Road 119 feet west of its intersection with Peters Creek Road in the Hollins Magisterial District. 289-9 Petition of Roanoke County Board of Supervisors to rezone a 1.03 acre tract from M-1, Industrial to B-1, Business to construct a rescue squad building and for Planning Commission review of the compatibility of a proposed rescue squad facility and the Comprehensive Plan, located at the southeast corner of Brambleton and Valley Forge Avenues in the Cave Spring Magisterial District. P. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance amending Section 21-4 (a), Enhanced Emergency Telephone Tax, of Chapter 21, Taxation, of the Roanoke County Code reducing the tax on purchases of local telephone service to fund the E911 Emergency Telephone System. 2. Ordinance accepting an offer for and authorizing the sale and conveyance of surplus real estate - well lot on Route 633, Benois Road. 3. Ordinance authorizing the conveyance of a right-of-way and easement to Appalachian Power Company. 4. Ordinance amending and reenacting Section 21-151, Levv of tax; amount of the Roanoke County Code to provide for the taxation of food that is sold for off-premises consumption. Q. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES R. CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS S. ADJOURNMENT 5 .- ~_ 1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE RONAOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 28, 1989 RESOLUTION 22889-1 EXPRESSING THE APPRECIATION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY TO ART WHITTAKER FOR OUTSTANDING CONTRIBUTIONS TO HIS COMMUNITY BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: WHEREAS, the service of Piedmont Airlines to the Roanoke Valley has been important to the residents and businesses of the area; and WHEREAS, Art Whittaker has worked for Piedmont Airlines since August 1948, and spent the last 22 years as Station Manager at the Roanoke Regional Airport; and WHEREAS, Art Whittaker has been responsible for the operation of Piedmont's airplanes in and out of Roanoke and has contributed greatly to the impressive efficiency and safety record of the company in the Roanoke Valley; and WHEREAS, Art Whittaker has been an active member of the Cave Spring community in which he resides and has benefited the citizens of Roanoke County by his involvement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, on behalf of the citizens of Roanoke County, and on its own part, expresses appreciation to Art Whittaker for over 40 years of dedicated service to the citizens of the Roanoke Valley. FURTHER, the Board of Supervisors extends its best wishes for a happy, restful and productive retirement. .- ? On motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by Supervisor Johnson, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: oJ9' ary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Resolutions of Appreciation File 2 ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 28, 1989 RESOLUTION EXPRESSING THE APPRECIATION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY TO ART WHITTAKER FOR OUTSTANDING CONTRIBUTIONS TO HIS COMMUNITY WHEREAS, the service of piedmont Airlines to the Roanoke Valley has been important to the residents and businesses of the area; and WHEREAS, Art Whittaker has worked for piedmont Airlines since August 1948, and spent the last 22 years as Station Manager at the Roanoke Regional Airport; and WHEREAS, Art Whittaker has been responsible for the operation of Piedmont's airplanes in and out of Roanoke and has contributed greatly to the impressive efficiency and safety record of the company in the Roanoke Valley; and WHEREAS, Art Whittaker has been an active member of the Cave Spring community in which he resides and has benefited the citizens of Roanoke County by his involvement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, on behalf of the citizens of Roanoke County, and on its own part, expresses appreciation to Art Whittaker for over 40 years of dedicated service to the citizens of the Roanoke Valley FURTHER, the Board of Supervisors extends its best wishes for a happy, restful and productive retirement. ITEM NUMBER ~"`~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: February 28, 1989 SUBJECT: Request from the Citizens for Governmental Excellence to appear at the meeting and present petitions for consolidation. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Attached is a letter from Mr. M. Christian Orndoff, representing the Citizens for Governmental Excellence, requesting time on the February 28, 1989 agenda to present to the Board petitions for consolidation of Roanoke County and Roanoke City. SUBMITTED BY: i~ ~ C l Elmer C. Dodge `~ County Administrator ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abp Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred To Garrett Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers _.. !{ . ~ ~ _ S . ) ~, ~ ~~~ a ~ „ ~~ Citizens For Governrri,er~,tacl Excellence February 14, 1989 Mary Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County P. 0. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 Re: Board of Supervisors Meeting Schedule February 28, 1989 Meeting Dear Ms. Allen: This letter serves as confirmation of the request of Citizens For Governmental Excellence for fifteen minutes' time to address the Honorable Chairman and Board of Supervisors at the meeting of the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors on Tuesday, February 28, 1989, at 3:00 p.m. We ask for the time in order to have representatives of the constituent groups comprising Citizens For Governmental Excellence give a brief statement regarding their petition drive to place the consolidation matter before the voters. Petitions will be filed immediately afterwards. If there are any difficulties with this or if there are any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Please send a copy of the meeting agenda or similar confirmation of this scheduling request at your earliest convenience. Very truly yours, ~' M. Christian~~Orndorff Citizens For Governmental Excellence (703) 345-0931 P.O. BOX 1225 ROANOKE, UA 24006 .k VIRGINIA: IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE IN RE: ) THE MATTER OF PROCEEDINGS ) FOR THE CONSOLIDATION OF ) NOTICE OF FILING THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE AND ) CITY OF ROANOKE, ) COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA ) DATE OF FILING: Tuesday, February 28, 1989 TIME OF FILING: 4:00 p.m. LOCATION OF FILING: Roanoke County Circuit Court Clerk's Office Roanoke County Courthouse, 3rd Floor Salem, Virginia TAKE NOTICE that the undersigned party will, by counsel, on the date and time shown above, file true copies of signed peti- tions obtained pursuant to 15.1-1131, Code of Virginia (1950), as amended, for the purpose of initiating consolidation pro- ceedings for the above localities as set out in the Code of Virginia. CITIZENS FOR GOVERNMENTAL EXCELLENCE .' i~~ By• By; Coun e Of ounsel M. Christian Orndorff 103 West Campbell Avenue Roanoke, Virginia 24011 (703) 345-0931 Thomas B. Dickenson P. 0. Box 2865 Roanoke, Virginia 24001 f` x-• CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing notice was either mailed by U.S. postal mails or delivered to the Roanoke County Attorney and the Roanoke County Clerk, P. 0. Box 29800, Roanoke, VA 24018-0789; the Roanoke City Attorney and the Roanoke City Clerk, Municipal Building, 215 Church Avenue, SW, Roanoke, Virginia 24011, on this the 24th day of February, 1989. 2 NOTICE OF FILING DATE OF FILING: Tuesday, February 28, 1989 TIME OF FILING: 4:00 p.m. LOCATION OF FILING: Roanoke City Circuit Court Clerk's Office Roanoke City Courthouse, 3rd Floor Roanoke, Virginia TAKE NOTICE that the undersigned party will, by counsel, on ~- i 'iVIRGINIA: `' ~~ IN RE: IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF ROANOKE THE MATTER OF PROCEEDINGS FOR THE CONSOLIDATION OF THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE AND j CITY OF ROANOKE, COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA ~'! !~ the date and time shown above, file true copies of signed peti- tions obtained pursuant to 15.1-1131, Code of Virginia (1850), as amended, for the purpose of initiating consolidation pro-~ ceedings for the above localities as set out in the Code of Virginia. CITIZENS FOR GOVERNMENTAL EXCELLENCE B By. `~ y~ Of Counsel Of Counsel M. Christian Orndorff 103 West Campbell Avenue Roanoke, Virginia .24011 (703) 345-0931 Thomas B. Dickenson P. 0. Box 2865 Roanoke, Virginia 24001 r. ~.i CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing notice was either mailed by U.S. postal mails or delivered to the Roanoke County Attorney and the Roanoke County Clerk, P. 0. Box 29800, Roanoke, VA 24018-0789; the Roanoke City Attorney and the Roanoke City Clerk, Municipal Building, 215 Church Avenue, SW, Roanoke, Virginia 24011, on this the 24th day of February, 1989• ~~~ 2 r VIRGINIA: IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF ROANOKE IN RE: ) THE MATTER OF PROCEEDINGS ) FILING FOR THE CONSOLIDATION OF ) THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE AND ) THE CITY OF ROANOKE, ) COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA ) Comes now Citizens for Governmental Excellence, an unin- ~ corporated association comprised of local civic groups, by counsel, and files these their petitions for initiation of proceedings for the consolidation of the County of Roanoke, Virginia, and the City of Roanoke, Virginia, pursuant to 15.1-1132, et sec.., Code of Virginia (1950), as amended, and in support hereof states as follows: 1. That the Citizens for Governmental Excellence is an unincorporated association comprised of members of the following local civic and volunteer organizations: Roanoke Jaycees, Northwest Redevelopment Corporation, Roanoke Valley Board of Realtors and the Cave Spring Jaycees. 2. That the purpose of the consolidation statutes is to foster and promote consolidation of political subdivisions of the Commonwealth of Virginia and the specific purpose of Section 15.1-1132, Code of Virginia (1950), as amended, is to provide for initiating of consolidation proceedings by interested citizens through a petition process described therein. 3. That Citizens for Governmental Excellence has collected the signatures of over Fifteen Percent (15~) of the 1 qualified voters in the City of Roanoke and in the County of Roanoke on their petition requesting a consolidation agreement between these political subdivisions and a referendum on such jagreement, as required by §15.1-1132, Code of Virginia (1950), as amended. 4. That such petitions with signatures of qualified voters of Roanoke City that have been reviewed and verified by the Roanoke City Registrar, copies of which are attached as Exhibit A-1 and incorporated herein Copies of additional petitions signed by qualified voters of Roanoke City, but not checked or verified by said Registrar, are attached hereto as Exhibit A-2 and incorporated herein. All of the above origi- nal petitions have been filed with the City of Roanoke as shown by the letter to the City Clerk, dated February 27, 1989, attached hereto as Exhibit A-3. 5. That copies of such petitions with signatures of qualified voters of Roanoke County that have been reviewed and verified by the Roanoke County Registrar are attached hereto as Exhibit B-1 and incorporated herein. Copies of additional petitions signed by qualified voters of Roanoke County, but not checked or verified by said Registrar, are attached hereto as Exhibit B-2 and incorporated herein. All of the above ori- ginal petitions have been filed with Roanoke County as shown by the letter to the County deputy clerk, dated February 28, 1989, attached hereto as Exhibit B-3. 6. That all of the signatures on the petitions have been signed within a twelve-month period. 2 ,', y~ WHEREFORE, your Petitioner respectfully requests this honorable court to accept the Citizens petitions attached hereto for the purpose of initiating consolidation proceedings between the County of Roanoke and the City of Roanoke under Title 15.1, Chapter 26, Article 4, Code of Virginia, and further prays that this court take such further action as is necessary or just. CITIZENS FOR GOVERNMENTAL EXCELLENCE By: y: Counsel for Petitioner M. Christian Orndorff Suite 300 103 West Campbell Avenue Roanoke, Virginia 24011 (703) 345-0931 Counsel for Citizens for Governmental Excellence Thomas B. Dickenson P. 0. Box 2865 Roanoke, Virginia 24001 CERTIFICATE I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing Filing and an attached draft order was hand deli- vered or mailed by U.S. Postal mails to the Office of the Roanoke City Clerk, and the Roanoke City Attorney, Municipal Building, 215 West Church Avenue, Roanoke, Virginia, and to the Office of the Roanoke County Clerk and the Roanoke County Attorney on this the 28th day of February, 1989. 3 ~ s VIRGINIA: IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF ROANOKE IN RE: THE MATTER OF PROCEEDINGS ) FOR THE CONSOLIDATION OF ) ORDER THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE AND ) THE CITY OF ROANOKE, ) COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA ) On this 28th day of February, 1989, came Citizens for Governmental Excellence, by counsel, and appeared before this court for the purpose of filing petitions signed by qualified voters of Roanoke City and Roanoke County, Virginia, in con- formity with Section 15.1-1132, Code of Virginia (1950), as amended. The Citizens for Governmental Excellence having filed said petitions with this court and upon review of this filing, the court finds that the said petitions contain the signatures of over Fifteen Percent (15~) of the qualified voters of Roanoke City, Virginia, and Roanoke County, Virginia, as of January 1, 1989; that these signatures have been signed within a twelve- month period; that the originals of these petitions have been filed with Roanoke City, Virginia and Roanoke County, Virginia, prior to filing with this court. Upon consideration whereof, it is ADJUDGED, ORDERED and DECREED that the governing bodies of Roanoke City, Virginia, and Roanoke County, Virginia, shall initiate consolidation proceedings under the provisions of 15.1-1132, Code of Virginia (1950), as amended, and Title 15.1, Chapter 26, 1 iArticle 4 of the Code of Virginia (1950), as amended, and to '.,effect a consolidation agreement within one year of the date of the filing of these petitions with this court. Further ORDERED that the Clerk of this court shall mail a certified copy of this order to counsel for Citizens for Governmental Excellence, to the Roanoke County Attorney and Chairman of the Roanoke City Board of Supervisors, to the Roanoke City Attorney and Mayor of the City of Roanoke. Date: ENTER: \ Judge, Roanoke City Circuit Court I ask for this: Counsel for Citizens for Governmental Excellence Counsel for Citizens for Governmental Excellence 2 i ~,._ -~. VIRGINIA: IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE IN RE: ITHE MATTER OF PROCEEDINGS FOR THE CONSOLIDATION OF THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE AND THE CITY OF ROANOKE, COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA ORDER On this 28th day of February, 1989, came Citizens for Governmental Excellence, by counsel, and appeared before this court for the purpose of filing petitions signed by qualified voters of Roanoke City and Roanoke County, Virginia, in con- formity with Section 15.1-1132, Code of Virginia (1950), as amended. The Citizens for Governmental Excellence having filed said petitions with this court and upon review of this filing, the court finds that the said petitions contain the signatures of I over Fifteen Percent (15%) of the qualified voters of Roanoke '.City, Virginia, and Roanoke County, Virginia, as of January 1, 1989; that these signatures have been signed within a twelve- month period; that the originals of these petitions have been filed with Roanoke City, Virginia and Roanoke County, Virginia, prior to filing with this court. Upon consideration whereof, it is ADJUDGED, ORDERED and DECREED that the governing bodies of Roanoke City, Virginia, and Roanoke County, Virginia, shall initiate consolidation proceedings under the provisions of 15.1-1132, Code of Virginia (1850), as amended, and Title 15.1, Chapter 26, 1 Article ~ of the Code of Virginia (1950), as amended, and to effect a consolidation agreement within one year of the date of the filing of these petitions with this court. Further ORDERED that the Clerk of this court shall mail a certified copy of this order to counsel for Citizens for Governmental Excellence, to the Roanoke County Attorney and Chairman of the Roanoke City Board of Supervisors, to the Roanoke City Attorney and Mayor of the City of Roanoke. Date: ENTER: Judge, Roanoke County Circuit Court I ask for this: Counsel for Citizens for Governmental Excellence Counsel for Citizens for Governmental Excellence 2 ~~~~i~~r~aa~~~~ri~~rrn~~ur~~'~~tu~~~~r~fii~rl~~r~~1ii~~~i~~~rri~rt~~~i~~'iii~f~~irf~~~i'~~~~~~rrr~~~r~~ri~~ti~~rlt~r~~~~~~r~i~n~~1~l~l~lr~nuil~~i~~t1~ I~~~ -~ ~ _„ ~`-~' - APPEARANCE REQUEST _ _ _ r _ _ _ AGENDA ITEM NO. ~ ~ _ _ SUBJECT ~'2-x~~-~-~~,~ ~~ `~-,~--,u~;5 ~5~; ~~~-;~z~-.~> ;-~~ ~~~~~-,~,~„~.yz~c ~~~~<<<~~~~s= -_ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so that I may comment.WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, _ I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW. - • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment = whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will - decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. - - • Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Ques- - = tions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. _. • All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized c speaker and audience members is not allowed. c - - • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. c • Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments _ with the clerk. _ ._ • INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED = GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION c _, FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO DEPUTY CLERK _ _ m~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~m ~`` ~r~~ii~~~~i~i~l`ti~~~~t'Yiil~fit~r`ri~~r'rll~~~lii~t~r~ii~l~t~iiirf~riiiiYfiii~ti1'tli~'ll~rr1111~°f~1~ir"Ifl~f~fl~i~~~it"f i~~i~fl~ill~rftl~r~liiti111i1frL '_ ,.y-- APPEA~.ANCE RE UEST _ Q - _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ AGENDA ITEM NO. ~ - I =_ ,_, SUBJECT CI"(-tZ.~r ~o~ ~ oJ+~ r~+~t+- ~~c~~~ _ _ __ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter _- so that I may comment.WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES = LISTED BELOW. _ • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment c whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to __ -' do otherwise. • Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Ques- tions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. _ _. • All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized =_ speaker and audience members is not allowed. c _ • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. _ _ • Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments c _ _ with the clerk. _ _. • INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED = = GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION -_ FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT _ -' THEM. _ _ PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO DEPUTY CLERK _ _ fiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii~iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiniiiiiiiiniiniiiitiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii~ ~~ty~r'l~i~i~~~~i~1~~~f17~Y~if((~"~~~ii~~ll"t1~ilii~il~l~iilfti~i~ri~iii-s~ili~tiil't~f`rl`pit'ii`Il~ii~tl~ril~"i~1~t~i~1I11y11i~1~Itilu~li~flj~~ii~~1~11i~ii~11111f~J 3 .~- APPEARANCE RE UEST - Q _ -_ - ~ ._ AGENDA ITEM NO. -~ _ SUBJECT ~.~-~zt.,s ~. ~rovf.K~~~~x( per//~~~ _' _ - _ _ _ _ c I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to = -_ recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter _- so that I may comment.WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, _ _ I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE - RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES =_ =- LISTED BELOW. _ _ - _- • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment ,_ whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will = decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, ._ = and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to ._ - do otherwise. _ ._ - __ • Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Ques- -_ tions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. _ _ • All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. c = • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. __ • Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. - _ • INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED = _= GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION =. = FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. _ PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO DEPUTY CLERK m~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~,~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~n lt~~liliiK.i,ii1~iiittiiriil'1r~iltilitliltiiilil`ir'lfriuiiiitili'iiltli~iiiti'i`r1111°liti"t~t11'1iIlil1lI1111i111'1ililftiii1r1111111i11"iiiY] APPEAIZ.ANCE RE VEST Q - _ AGENDA ITEM NO. SUBJECT ~ ~ -- G~ ~. ~~ ~~ ~`~-P o' f' ~~ - _ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter _ • so that I may comment.WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, = I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES = = LISTED BELOW. _ • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will = decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to =_ do otherwise. __ • Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Ques- = tions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. • All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized c speaker and audience members is not allowed. c • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. c c = • Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments =_ with the clerk. _ • INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO DEPUTY CLERK mll 11111111 IIIIIIIiillllllllllllllllllilllllllilllllllllllllllllllllllllllilillllllllilllllllllllllllllililllllllllillllliilllllit j~l~~`I~~1:Kt,~~~~ll~ly'~~t~~i~~~`1i~ltili'fi~~tfi~lf"1~`tl~'fiiliSl~~t~i~t~iltllf~r`Iif~i~il~~li~l~t7iilii~i~filltl~li'1I1t11~i111~1111itii~'ili'1'tfllillfli~l~jyj~ _:. ~ '~ "' APPEARANCE RE UEST Q _ _ _ =_ AGENDA ITEM NO. ~- _ _ _ - SUBJECT C~7-~~s ~ ~~7~ ~~~~~ -_ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to reco nize me durin the ublic hearin on the above matter =_ -- g t I ma comment.WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, _ so tha y _ = I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE _ = RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW. _ • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment _ whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will = decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to =_ do otherwise. _ • Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Ques- -_ = tions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. __ _ • All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized =_ speaker and audience members is not allowed. • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. __ • Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. =' • INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED = GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT _ = THEM. __ PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO DEPUTY CLERK _ - mlllillllllllllllliilllllllillllilllllllillliilllliilllllllilllilllllllllilllllilllllllllllllilllillllllllllllllllllllllllllllill .~- AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 28, 1989 RESOLUTION 22889-2 APPROVING THE FISCAL YEAR 1989/90 OPERATING BUDGET FOR THE ROANOKE REGIONAL AIRPORT COMMISSION WHEREAS, Section 17 of the contract between the City of Roanoke and Roanoke County, Virginia, requires the Roanoke Region- al Airport Commission to prepare and submit its operating budget for the forthcoming fiscal year to the Board of Supervisors of the County and the City Council of the City prior to February 15 of each year; and WHEREAS, the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission trans- mitted its 1989-90 budget to the City of Roanoke and Roanoke County by letter dated February 14, 1989; and WHEREAS, the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission adopted its fiscal year 1989-90 annual operating budget at its February 14, 1989, meeting; and WHEREAS, it appears that estimated revenues shall once again exceed estimated expenses. NOW, THEREFORE it is hereby resolved by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the annual operating budget for fiscal year 1989-90 of the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission is hereby approved. 2. That the Deputy Clerk to the Board of Supervisors is hereby directed to forward a certified copy of this resolution to the Chairman of the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission, and r to Jack Spain Jr., Esquire, Hunton & Williams, Richmond, Virgin- ia. On motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by Supervisor Johnson, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Paul Mahoney, County Attorney Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance Reta Busher, Director, Management & Budget W. Robert Herbert, Chairman, Roanoke Regional Airport Commission Lee Garrett, Vice-Chairman, Roanoke Regional Airport Commission Jack Spain, Jr., Esquire, Hunton & Williams Mary F. Parker, Clerk, Roanoke City Council 2 ACTION # ITEM NUMBER ~~_ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: February 28, 1989 Approval of the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission Budget for the Fiscal Year 1989-90 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~/ BACKGROUND: In accordance with the requirements of the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission Act, the Commission formally approved their operating budget for the 1989-90 fiscal year at its meeting on February 14, 1989. This budget must now be approved by the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors and the Roanoke City Council. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Attached are copies of the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission budget for fiscal year 1989-90 which was approved at the Airport Commission meeting on February 14, 1989. Revenue projections are based on opening the new terminal in October, 1989 and also include rental of the existing terminal. Revenue projections are conservative based upon preliminary rate negotiations with the airlines. Expenditure projections include the following additional personnel which will be needed for the new terminal building: Security Officers - 4 Custodians - 4 Maintenance Mechanic I - 1 Laborer/Operator - 1 Executive Director - 1 Total 11 This 1989-90 budget results in a net excess from operations of $17,146 but also includes funded depreciation of $580,366. Based upon conservative projections, this surplus should continue to grow in future years. FISCAL IMPACT: Q~ Since the `attached operating budget for the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission for the fiscal year 1989-90 does not produce a deficit, there is no fiscal impact to the County of Roanoke. We will continue to make our annual contribution to the Regional Airport Commission of $264,640 which is included in our 1988-89 fiscal year budget and will also be included in our 1989-90 fiscal year budget. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends adopting the attached Resolution approving the operating budget for the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission for the 1989-90 fiscal year. Respectfully submitted, Diane D. Hyat Director of Finance Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred To Motion by: ACTION Approved by, ~'Z Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator Garrett Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers VOTE No Yes Abs Airport Commission .~N. Robert Herbert, Chairman Lee Garrett Joel M. Schlanger Bob L. Johnson Kit B. Kiser 1635 Aviation Drive Roanoke,Urginia 2401 (703) 981-2531 ~~ ~. Robert C. Poole, Airport Manager February 14, 1989 Honorable Chairman and Members Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Roanoke, Virginia Honorable Mayor and Members Roanoke City Council Roanoke, Virginia Re: Roanoke Regional Airport Commission Fiscal Year 1989-1990 Budget Dear Mrs. Bowles and Gentlemen: Raava~ ^~on~. {'Y In accordance with the requirements of the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission Act, submitted for your approval is the Airport Commission's 1989-1990 proposed operating and capital budget. The Commission has been advised by bond counsel that formal approval of the budget by resolution of each of the participating political subdivi- sions would be appropriate. Therefore, on behalf of the Commission, the fiscal year 1989-1990 budget is enclosed for your approval by resolution. I will be pleased to respond to any questions or comments that you may have with regard to this matter. On behalf of the Commission, thank you very much for your help and cooperation. Very truly yours, ~~~ W. Robert Herbert Commission Chairman WRH:MAW:csp Enclosure cc: Members, Roanoke Regional Airport Commission Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk, Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Mary F. Parker, Clerk, Roanoke City Council Paul M. Mahoney, Roanoke County Attorney Wilburn C. Dibling, Jr., Roanoke City Attorney Robert C. Poole, Airport Manager Cathy S. Pendleton, Commission Secretary ~~~ ROANOKE REGIONAL AIRPORT PROPOSED FY 89-90 BUDGET EXPENDITURE PROJECTIONS Current Proposed 1988-89 1989-90 1. Operations and Maintenance A. Salaries, Wages and Benefits $ 565,458 $ 851,307 B. Operating Expenditures 527,032 771,137 C. Internal Services 649,436 574,300 Total Operations and Maintenance $1,741,926 $2,216,744 2. Non-Operating Expenses A. Interest $ 107,412 $ 648,780 B, Depreciation 593,465 580,366 Total Non-Operating $ 700,877 $1,229,146 3. Capital from Revenue A. Equipment $ 17,020 $ 73,800 B. Projects 204,541 165,000 Total Capital from Revenue $ 221,561 $ 238,800 TOTAL EXPENDITURE PROJECTIONS $2,664,364 $3,684,690 ~~ Page 2 Revenue Projections Operating Revenue 1. Terminal Building A. Concessions B. Advertising C. Building Rentals D. Privilege Fees 2. Airfield A. Landing Fees B. Miscellaneous 3. Parking Lot 4. Building and Equipment 5. Other Total Operating Revenue Non-Operating Revenue 1. Interest on Investment TOTAL REVENUE Current Proposed 1988-89 1989-90 $ 809,288 $ 866,401 24,664 25,404 202,600 742,431 7,954 8,192 400,449 771,852 48,827 175,078 819,51.1 877,860 174,516 179,751 12,275 12,643 $2,500,084 $3,659,612 $ 53,035 $ 42,224 $2,553,119 $3,701,836 . ~""' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 28, 1989 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE FISCAL YEAR 1989- 90 OPERATING BUDGET FOR THE ROANOKE REGIONAL AIRPORT COMMISSION WHEREAS, Section 17 of the contract between the City of Roanoke and Roanoke County, Virginia, requires the Roanoke Region- al Airport Commission to prepare and submit its operating budget for the forthcoming fiscal year to the Board of Supervisors of the County and the City Council of the City prior to February 15 of each year; and WHEREAS, the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission trans- mitted its 1989-90 budget to the City of Roanoke and Roanoke County by letter dated February 14, 1989; and WHEREAS, the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission adopted its fiscal year 1989-90 annual operating budget at its February 14, 1989, meeting; and WHEREAS, it appears that estimated revenues shall once again exceed estimated expenses. NOW, THEREFORE it is hereby resolved by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the annual operating budget for fiscal year 1989-90 of the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission is hereby approved. 2. That the Deputy Clerk to the Board of Supervisors is hereby directed to forward a certified copy of this resolution to the Chairman of the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission, and to Jack Spain Jr., Esquire, Hunton & Williams, Richmond, Virgin- ia. ACTION # A-22889-3 ITEM NUMBER ~-'~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: February 28, 1989 AGENDA ITEM: Request from the Registrar for an Appropriation of Funds for Primary Elections COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS' ~' ~ ~F BACKGROUND: The State Republican Party has called for a primary election to be held on Tuesday, June 13, 1989. Since this action was not anticipated during the preparation of the 1988-89 fiscal year budget, it is necessary that we come to you, the Board of Supervisors, at this time requesting that $23,855.00 be appropriated to the Registrar's Office from the Unappropriated Balance. This appropriation will cover the cost of salaries for the election officials at each of the election poll sites, the cost of moving and setting up the voting machines, the cost of printed materials, the cost of handling absentee ballots, and any other costs associated with this special election. These estimates have been derived from the actual costs incurred during the primary election in March 1988, and have been scaled accordingly, since only one party is participating in this primary. None of these monies are reimbursable by the State. ALTERNATIVES AND IMPACT: FISCAL IMPACT: STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the appropriation in the amount of $23,855.00 be made from the Unappropriated Balance. Respectfully Submitted: Approved By: r~Jr- ,~P G~~ -~ 1 ohn M. Chambli s, Jr. Elmer C. Hodge Assistant Administrator County Administrator Approved (x ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Ref erred To Motion by: y / Bob L. Johnson to approve cc: Elizabeth Leah Reta Busher ACTION VOTE Harr C. Nickens No Yes Abs File John Chambliss Garrett x Johnson x McGraw x Nickens x Robers x _~ ~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 28, 1989 RESOLUTION 22889-4 RESCHEDULING A REGULAR MEETING SCHEDULED FOR JUNE 13, 1989 WHEREAS, by Resolution 1489-2 adopted on January 4, 1989, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County established a regular meeting schedule for the Board of Supervisors for calen- dar year 1989; and WHEREAS, a primary election will be held on June 13, 1989, a date previously scheduled for a regular meeting of the Board. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That Resolution 1489-2 establishing a certain regu- lar meeting schedule for the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors is hereby amended by canceling the meeting scheduled for June 13, 1989; and 2. That the meeting scheduled for June 13, 1989, is hereby rescheduled to Wednesday, June 14, 1989, at 3:00 p.m. at the Roanoke County Administration Center at 3738 Brambleton Ave- nue; and 3. That the County Administrator shall cause a copy of this Resolution to be posted at the Roanoke County Courthouse, the Roanoke County Administration Center, and each County library, and to be advertised in the Roanoke Times and World News on May 30, 1989, and June 6, 1989. On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor Robers, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Paul Mahoney, County Attorney 2 ACTION # ITEM NUMBER _ =~ AT A RHGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: February 28, 1989 AGENDA ITEM: Rescheduling of June 13, 1989 meeting date because of_ Primary Election COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The State Republican Party has scheduled a primary election for governor for June 13, 1989. The County Registrar's Office uses the Roanoke County Community Room as a voting precinct dur- ing elections and the June 13th date is the same date as a Board meeting. Z'he staff recommends that the Board meeting be resche- duled from June ]_3, 1989, at 3:00 p.m. to June 14, 1989, at 3:00 p.m. to accommodate the Registrar's Office. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board favorably consider the adop- tion of the attached resolution. Respectfully submitted, ~~~ ~.. Paul. M. Mahoney County Attorney ---------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred To Garrett Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers ~` "° t f AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON `TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 28, 1989 RESOLUTION RESCHEDULING A REGULAR MEETING SCHEDULED FOR JUNE 13, 1989 WHEREAS, by Resolution 1489-2 adopted on January 4, 1989, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County established a regular meeting schedule for the Board of Supervisors for calen- dar year 1989; and WHEREAS, a primary election will be held on June 13, 1989, a date previously scheduled for a regular meeting of the Board. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That Resolution 1489-2 establishing a certain regu- lar meeting schedule for the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors is hereby amended by canceling the meeting scheduled for June 13, 1989; and 2. That the meeting scheduled for June 13, 1989, is hereby rescheduled to Wednesday, June 14, 1989, at 3:00 p.m, at the Roanoke County Administration Center at 3738 Br.ambleton Ave- nue; and 3. That the County Administrator shall cause a copy of this Resolution to be posted at the Roanoke County Courthouse, the Roanoke County Administration Center, and each County library, and to be advertised in the Roanoke Times and World News on May 30, :1.989, and June 6, 1989. i .~ o~ ROANp~~ ~ ' ~ `' ~ v a2 1$ E50 88 ~FSQtlICENTE1yN\~~' A BeautifulBeginning E. ELIZABETH LEAH GENERA~REGISTRAR ` ~ ~~~ ~ ~ , f BOARD OF ELECTIONS ELECTORAL BOARD ARMAND L. SANDERSON CHAIRMAN M Al' W. JOHNSON VICE CHAIRMAN LEONARD M. PICK T0: Elmer Hodge, County Adminirrs//t rator SECRETARY FROM: Elizabeth Leah, Registra~'~°f~ DATE: February 16, 1989 SUBJECT: Special Appropriations for June 1989 Republican Primary The State Republican Party has called for a Primary Election to be held on Tuesday, June 13, 1989. Since I was not aware of this fact when preparing the budget for this year, it is necessary to request an additional appro- priation for this election. The total amount is $23_,855. Listed below is an estimation of the items that necessitate this request. Part Time - 03-6-01300-2-10030 ...........................$15,430 Election Officials 200 x $70 = 14,000 Chief Elect. Officials 31 x $30 = $930 Janitors 25 x $20 = $500 These people open and close the voting places. Professional Services - 03-6-01300-2-30020 ..............$ 3,600 This is for set up of voting machines and for machine custodian for election day. Printing - 03-6-01300-2-30061 ...........................$ 700 Cost of printing machine and paper ballots. Postage - 03-6-01300-2-52010 ............................$ 225 Cost of mailing absentee ballots 500 x .45 = $225 Warrants and Fees - 03-6-01300-2-58040 ..................$ 50 Paid to the Clerk of Court for receiving and storing election materials. Rent of Vehicles - 03-6-01300-2-80011 ...................$ 1,200 Cost of renting trucks for delivery and pick up of voting machines. P.O. BOX 20884. ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0089 (703) 772-7500 Memorandum Elmer Hodge February 16, 1989 Page 2 Rent of Buildings - 03-6-01300-2-80022 .......................$ 150 Paid to Churches that let us use their buildings on election day. Overtime - 03-6-01300-1-10020 ...............................$ 500 We are required by State Law to keep the office open three Saturdays prior to the Election and the office is open for approximately 16 hours on Election Day. Part time - 03-6-01300-1-10030 ...............................$ 2,000 Cost of manpower to move the voting machines. I have talked to John Chambliss about this appropriation and he is going to assist in the preparation of this report. I would request that this appear on the agenda for the February 28th Board of Supervisors Meeting. Please contact me if you have any questions about this matter. cc: John Chambliss Reta Busher _1 ACTION # A-22889-5 ITEM NUMBER ~-~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: February 28, 1989 Authorization to initiate a sanitary sewer project for the Highfields/Lakeland Road Area COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~~'~~ ~~ BACKGROUND: Sixteen residents that live along Highfields and Lakeland Road have petitioned Roanoke County to supply public sanitary sewer service under provisions of the County Code. A copy of the petition and a map of the area is attached. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: It is requested that the Board of Supervisors establish a special sewer service area as indicated on the attached map so that a special sewer connection fee for the area can be made. It is further requested that the Board of Supervisors authorize Staff to complete a sufficient engineering study to establish the cost of a sewer project to serve the special service area. Upon completion of this study, staff would notify the affected property owners of the proposed project and provide them with a service agreement. The agreement would include the not to exceed special sewer connection fee and state that the project was contingent upon final approval by the Board of Supervisors. Depending on the number of residents executing agreements, the special sewer connection fee for public sewer service will be between $4,000.00 and $5,000.00 per lot. This sanitary sewer project would only serve the petitioned area and no County cost participation is planned. After receipt of agreements from the affected property owners, Staff will present a detailed report of the project for final approval by the Board of Supervisors. °~ STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors authorize Staff to initiate this project and establish a special sewer service area as delineated on the attached map along with the special connection fee for this area. It is further recommended that Staff be authorized to send notice of the project and agreements for service to all property owners within the special service area in order that a commitment to the project can be made by the residents. SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED Cliffor ig, P. Elmer C. H ge Utility Director County Administrator Approved (X) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to ACTION Motion by: Lee Garrett/ Harry C . Nickens to ap~r~c T,~ recommendation VOTE No Yes Abs Garrett x Johnson x McGraw x Nickens x Robers x cc: File Cliff Craig, Director, Utilities Phil Henry, Director, Engineering John Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator WE, THE L~IDERSIQJED nINERS OF THE HIGHF'IEI,DS DO REQUEST FROM THE ~~PI'Y OF ROANOKE VA THAT S~ LAI~AT,E RD ASSOCIATION, US. OiA2 RIC~iT TO THIS PETITION HAS BEEN G~RArTI'E'D BY ROANOKE OOLHVT'Y BOARD OF SUPERVISORS. NAME ADDRESS ~,Ep ~J ~ ~ -- s~'~ ~ ~~ s 77~` ~~ _ ~ _ 77~~Z~ ~L ~~~~ -// ~ - ~ ~ ~;' ' ;' ~~~'t'''-,~~,' ,6L ~ ~ ~ ~~~ -r ~ j~i~ ~ _ U ~ ~- - _ .~ : ~ ~~ ~, f ~~ ~ ~ y_!1 ..~~ /" _ 551 s~s~ ~~ ~~~ . - ~ f-' ,~ ~. _~ ~ ~~' -- . 77~~3 a.~/ ~ ~-~ ~~y~ ~3Zy z~l~~ ~` y ~::,, .. _ ~' ~ - _ -~ _ ._ - ~. 7_. _ 1 .. ,~ ~: , f '1, r, , - ~~ _ ~ ; ~ ~~. ~, 3 "'../ NORTH SEWER PROJECT HIGHFIELDS COMMUNITY SERVICES LAKELAND ROAD AREA AND DEVELOPMENT ACTION # A-22889-6 ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: February 28, 1989 AGENDA ITEM: Authorization to initiate a water project for the Old Hollins Road Area COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS• BACKGROUND: --° ~`"~.~ In November, 1989, forty-six residents along Hunters Trail and Olde Tavern Road requested the County provide a public water system to their area. During a preliminary concept design conducted by County staff, it was determined that such a water system could be constructed along with an upgrade of the existing water system serving Old Hollins Road and the Ardmore area. The Old Hollins Road area has low water pressure that requires industries such as Ingersol Rand and AMP to construct their own storage and pumping in order to provide adequate fire protection. The Ardmore area along Garman Road is served by a well that has a very low quality water and also can not provide water for fire protection. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: By developing a water project that will provide full water service to both the existing Old Hollins Road/Ardmore area, as well as the Hunters Trail/Olde Tavern Road area, the overall cost of the eventual system will be reduced. The estimated cost of this project is $368,000.00. Staff requests that the Board of Supervisors authorize this project contingent upon at least forty-six residents in the affected new service area signing an agreement to participate in and provide part of the financing of this project. Staff further requests that the Board of Supervisors establish a special water service area as indicated on the attached map which includes the properties along Shadwell Drive and in the Belleview Gardens and Belleview Estates subdivisions. 1 "D-(, The purpose of this special water service area is to designate an area that will have a specific water connection fee assigned for a period of six years following the completion of the above-mentioned water project. It is proposed that a special water connection fee of $4,000.00 per equivalent residential connection be established for this area. The normal off-site facility fee of $1,036.00 is included within the special $4,000.00 and is credited against the cost of off-site construction as provided for in the water ordinances for those residents that execute agreements with the County within 90 days of Board final approval of the project. They would be required to pay $500.00 of the $4,000.00 connection fee within 90 days of the Board's final approval of this project. The remaining $3,500.00 could be paid at the same time or the County would finance the $3,500.00 at 7 1/2$ for a period not to exceed six years. Any other water connections made within this special service area during its six year period of existence would be required to pay the $4,000.00 special water connection fee plus the normal off-site facility and basic connection fee. No credit would be made nor would any of the fee be financed by the County. For example, a normal residential water connection made within this special service area at the current rate would be $5,536.00 for those connections not signing an agreement with the County within the 90 days of Board final approval for this project. After receipt of agreements from the affected property owners, Staff will present a detailed report of the project for final approval by the Board of Supervisors, along with an ordinance to effect this project. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is recommeded the Board of Supervisors authorize Staff to initiate this project and establish a special water service area as delineated on the attached map along with the special connection fee for this area. It is further recommended that Staff be authorized to send notice of the project and agreements for service to all property owners within the special service area in order that a commitment to the project can be made by the residents. SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED: i Clifford r ig, P.E. Elmer C. Hodge Utility Director County Administrator 2 ~-b ----------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved (X) Motion by: Bob L. Johnson/ No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Steven A. McGraw to approve Garrett x Received ( ) staff recommendation Johnson _~ Referred McGraw _~ to Nickens ~ Robers ~ cc: File Cliff Craig, Director, Utilities Phil Henry, Director, Engineering John Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator 3 ~ (lx...~~..r .. II00 1 ~0 Q ( // ~~ 5 N _ r ~ ( I ~:, P / ~ 111.78 T ~Q/• _ I .~. , pax _.,;G\ f~ ' c \"'~ "1 ~,~ .i?" l ~OI~IINIQI ~ R \ i •° '4 •~•e I i ~J' 2 ~~ 601 4a ~ v P .,. "~ ~ ~>~~ "' l 4 ~ . ~~~~~`` ~ ~' ;' - ~ 3 ~ 9 im i / ~ ~*3 ~ ~ " \ ~ wor 11 ,, "°~~ Sit ~" . ... '°"~" •~ . f SOgry ~~ RO~,Mr 'b ~ rr - ~ ~, x.10' ~ (: d a ' } e t 18d2~ ~ i . - o- '~ - ~ s~ a SUMMEROEAN y - ~ -. - -~ ,~„~,,,, 9 ~. VICINITY MAP ~ _~ r F/ .r• `:..i NORTH WATER PROJECT OLD HOLLINS COMMUNITY SERVICES ROAD AREA AND DEVELOPMENT 4 T In AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 28, 1989 RESOLUTION 22889-7 AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE AND SALE OF THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA, REVENUE ANTICIPATION NOTES, SERIES 1989A IN THE AMOUNT $9,000,000 BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors ("Board") of the County of Roanoke, Virginia ("County") adopted a resolution on February 14, 1989, authorizing the County to borrow not to exceed $17,000,000 and issue its revenue anticipation notes therefor; WHEREAS, the Board has determined that it is necessary and expedient to borrow $9,000,000 and to issue its Revenue Anticipation Notes, Series 1989A therefor ("Notes") to meet casual cash flow deficits of the County; and WHEREAS, bids have been taken for the purchase of the Notes, and the County desires to specify the form and details of the Notes and to award the Notes to the bidder whose proposal results in the lowest interest cost to the County. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia: 1. The Board of the County determines that it is advisable to contract a debt and issue and sell the Notes in an aggregate principal amount of $9,000,000. The issuance and sale of the Notes are authorized. The proceeds from the sale of the Notes shall be used to meet casual cash flow deficits of the County. 2. The Notes shall be issued in bearer form, without privilege of registration and without coupons, in substantially the form attached as Exhibit A. The Notes shall be dated as of the date of their issuance and delivery, shall be issued in denominations of $25,000 shall be numbered N-1 and upward, sequentially, shall bear interest at the annual rate of 6.980 payable at maturity, and shall mature on June 15, 1989. The Notes shall not be subject to payment or redemption before maturity. 3. The County Administrator and Treasurer of the County are hereby authorized and directed to execute the Notes, and the Treasurer is hereby authorized to affix or imprint the seal of the County on the Notes. The form of execution, imprinting of the seal and attestation may be by facsimile; provided, however, if the signatures of the County Administrator and Treasurer are both by facsimile, the Notes shall not be valid until authenticated by the manual signature of the Paying Agent. In case any officer whose signature or a facsimile of whose signature shall appear on any Note shall cease to be such officer before the delivery of the Notes, such signature or such facsimile shall nevertheless be valid and sufficient for all purposes the same as if he or she had remained in office until such delivery. Any Note may bear the facsimile signature of or may be signed by such persons as at the actual time of its execution are the proper officers to sign such Note although at the date of delivery of such Note such persons may not have been such officers. Upon receipt of payment therefor, the Treasurer 2 of the County or such agent as may be designated, shall issue and deliver the Notes to the purchaser or purchasers thereof. The officers and agents of the County are further authorized and directed to do all acts required by the Notes and by this Resolution for the full, punctual and complete performance of all things necessary for this borrowing. 4. Crestar Bank, Richmond, Virginia is appointed as Paying Agents for the Notes. The principal of and interest on the Notes shall be payable in lawful money of the United States upon surrender of the Notes on the maturity date at the principal corporate trust office of the Paying Agent in Richmond, Virginia. 5. The Board agrees on behalf of the County that the proceeds from the issuance and sale of the Notes will be invested and expended as set forth in the Non-Arbitrage Certificate of the County to be delivered at the time of the issuance and delivery of the Notes and that the County will comply with the covenants and representations contained therein. Further, the County shall comply with the reporting requirements of Section 149(e) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. 6. The Board determines that it is in the best interest of the County to accept the bid of Central Fidelity Bank to purchase the Notes and such bid is accepted. 7. The officers and agents of the County are authorized and directed to take such further action as may be necessary or convenient in connection with the issuance, sale and delivery of the Notes and all actions previously taken by such 3 officers and agents in connection therewith are ratified and confirmed. 8. The Offering Circular with respect to the sale of the Notes is hereby approved in substantially the form submitted at this meeting and the County Administrator is authorized to execute and deliver the Offering Circular with such changes, additions and deletions as he deems appropriate. 9. The appropriate officers and agents of the County are authorized and directed to immediately cause a certified copy of this Resolution, setting forth the form and details of the Notes, to be filed with the Circuit Court of the County pursuant to Sections 15.1-199 and 15.1-212 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended. 10. This Resolution shall take effect immediately. On motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by Supervisor McGraw, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens NAYS: None ABSTAIN: Supervisor Garrett A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance (two certified copies) Reta Busher, Director, Mangement & Budget Don Myers, Assistant County Administrator Alfred C. Anderson, Treasurer Paul Mahoney, County Attorney (one certified copy) 4 EXHIBIT A N- UNITED STATES OF AMERICA COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA REVENUE ANTICIPATION NOTE SERIES 1989A $25,000 The COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA (the "County"), for value received, acknowledges itself indebted and promises to pay to BEARER upon presentation and surrender of this Note on June 15, 1989, the sum of TWENTY-FIVE THOUSAND DOLLARS ($25,000), together with interest thereon at the rate of 6.98 percent (6.98%) per annum payable at maturity. Both the principal of and interest on this Note are payable in lawful money of the United States of America upon presentation and surrender of this Note at the principal corporate trust office of Crestar Bank, Richmond, Virginia. This Note is one of a series of Notes in the aggregate principal amount of $9,000,000 authorized by the Board of Supervisors of the County by resolutions adopted on February 14, 1989, and February 28, 1989 (the "Resolutions"), pursuant to the Constitution and laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia, and 5 particularly Section 15.1-545 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended, and is issued for the purpose of_ meeting r_asual, deficits in the revenue of the County and creating a debt in anticipation of the collection of revenue of the County. This Note is not subject to redemption before maturity. It is certified and recited that all acts, conditions and things required by the Constitution and statutes of the Commonwealth of Virginia to happen, exist or be performed precedent to the issuance of this Note have happened, existed or been performed in due time, form and manner as so required and that the indebtedness evidenced by this Note is within every debt and other limit prescribed by the Constitution and statutes of the Commonwealth of Virginia. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia, has caused this Note to be signed by the facsimile signatures of its County Administrator and a facsimile of the Seal of the County to be affixed and attested by the facsimile signature of the Treasurer of the County and this Note to be dated March 8, 1989. COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA By County Administrator County of Roanoke, Virginia 6 Attest: By Treasurer County of Roanoke, Virginia CERTIFICATE OF AUTHENTICATION This Note is one of the Notes described in the within-mentioned Resolutions. CRESTAR BANK, as Paying Agent By Its Authorized Representative ACTION # ITEM NUMBER / -~ `7 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF 'I'H.E BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: February 28, 1989 Award of Bid for $9 Miltion Revenue Anticipation Notes COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND: On February 14, 1989, a public hearing was held to authorize the County to borrow up to $17 million during the calendar year. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Bids will be received by the County of Roanoke on Tuesday, February 28, 1989 for $9 million Revenue Anticipation Notes which the County currently needs to cover its temporary cash deficit. The formal Resolution indicating the successful bidder and interest rates will be presented at the Board meeting for your consideration. The County anticipates taking receipt of these monies on Wednesday, March 8, 1989. FISCAL IMPACT: The cost of interest expense and issuance cost have been budgeted in the 1988-89 fiscal year budget. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors adopt the Resolution which will be presented on Tuesday, February 28, 1989. Respectfully submitted, Approved by, ^ ~ f ~.e~ ~. ~-t cc~ ~~ %~ Diane D. Hyatt E mer C. dg Director of Finance County Administrator Approved Denied Received Referred To Motion by: ACTION Garrett Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers VOTE No Yes Abs AT A REGULAR MEETING OF TH_E BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 28, 1989 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE AND SALE OF THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA, REVENUE ANTICIPATION NOTES, SERIES 1989A IN THE AMOUNT $9,000,000 BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: . WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors ("Board") of the County of Roanoke, Virginia ("County") adopted a resolution on February 14, 1989, authorizing the County to borrow not to exceed $17,000,000 and issue its revenue anticipation notes therefor; WHEREAS, the Board has determined that it is necessary and expedient to borrow $9,000,000 and to issue its Revenue Anticipation Notes, Series 1989A therefor ("Notes") to meet casual cash flow deficits of the County; and WHEREAS, bids have been taken for the purchase of the Notes, and the County desires to specify the form and details of the Notes and to award the Notes to the bidder whose proposal results in the lowest interest cost to the County. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia: 1. The Board of the County determines that it is advisable to contract a debt and issue and sell the Notes in an aggregate principal amount of $9,000,000. The issuance and sale of the Notes are authorized. The proceeds from the sale of the Notes shall be used to meet casual cash flow deficits of the County. 2. The Notes shall be issued in bearer form, without privilege of registration and without coupons, in substantially the form attached as Exhibit A. The Notes shall be dated as of the date of their issuance and delivery, shall be issued in denominations of $25,000 shall be numbered N-1 and upward, sequentially, shall bear interest at the annual rate of o payable at maturity, and shall mature on June 15, 1989. The Notes shall not be subject to payment or redemption before maturity. 3. The County Administrator and Treasurer of the County are hereby authorized and directed to execute the Notes, and the Treasurer is hereby authorized to affix or imprint the seal of the County on the Notes. The form of execution, imprinting of the seal and attestation may be by facsimile; provided, however, if the signatures of the County Administrator and Treasurer are both by facsimile, the Notes shall not be valid until authenticated by the manual signature of the Paying Agent. In case any officer whose signature or a facsimile of whose signature shall appear on any Note shall cease to be such officer before the delivery of the Notes, such signature or such facsimile shall nevertheless be valid and sufficient for all purposes the same as if he or she had remained in office until such delivery. Any Note may bear the facsimile signature of or may be signed by such persons as at the actual time of its execution are the proper officers to sign such Note although at the date of delivery of such Note such persons may not have been such officers. Upon receipt of payment therefor, the Treasurer of the County or such agent as may be designated, shall issue and _ deliver the Notes to the purchaser or purchasers thereof. The officers and agents of the County are further authorized and directed to do all acts required by the Notes and by this Resolution for the full, punctual and complete performance of all things necessary for this borrowing. 4. Crestar Bank, Richmond, Virginia is appointed as Paying Agents for the Notes. The principal of and interest on the Notes shall be payable in lawful money of the United States upon surrender of the Notes on the maturity date at the principal corporate trust office of the Paying Agent in Richmond, Virginia. 5. The Board agrees on behalf of the County that the proceeds from the issuance and sale of the Notes will be invested and expended as set forth in the Non-Arbitrage Certificate of the County to be delivered at the time of the issuance and delivery of the Notes and that the County will comply with the covenants and representations contained therein. Further, the County shall comply with the reporting requirements of Section 149(e) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. 6. The Board determines that it is in the best interest of the County to accept the bid of to purchase the Notes and such bid is accepted. 7. The officers and agents of the County are authorized and directed to take such further action as may be necessary or convenient in connection with the issuance, sale and delivery of the Notes and all actions previously taken by such officers and agents in connection therewith are ratified and confirmed. 8. The Offering Circular with respect to the sale of the Notes is hereby approved in substantially the form submitted at this meeting and the County Administrator is authorized to execute and deliver the Offering Circular with such changes, additions and deletions as he deems appropriate. 9. The appropriate officers and agents of the County are authorized and directed to immediately cause a certified copy of this Resolution, setting forth the form and details of the Notes, to be filed with the Circuit Court of the County pursuant to Sections 15.1-199 and 15.1-212 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended. 10. This Resolution shall take effect immediately. EXHIBIT A N- UNITED STATES OF AMERICA COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA REVENUE ANTICIPATION NOTE SERIES 1989A $25,000 The COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA (the "County"), for value received, acknowledges itself indebted and promises to pay to BEARER upon presentation and surrender of this Note on June 15, 1989, the sum of TWENTY-FIVE THOUSAND DOLLARS ($25,000), together with interest thereon at the rate of percent (_%) per annum payable at maturity. Both the principal of and interest on this Note are payable in lawful money of the United States of America upon presentation and surrender of this Note at the principal corporate trust office of Crestar Bank, Richmond, Virginia. This Note is one of a series of Notes in the aggregate principal amount of $9,000,000 authorized by the Board of Supervisors of the County by resolutions adopted on February 14, 1989, and February 28, 1989 (the "Resolutions"), pursuant to the Constitution and laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia, and particularly Section 15.1-545 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended, and is issued for the purpose of meeting casual deficits in the revenue of the County and creating a debt in anticipation of the collection of revenue of the County. This Note is not subject to redemption before maturity. It is certified and recited that all acts, conditions and things required by the Constitution and statutes of the Commonwealth of Virginia to happen, exist or be performed precedent to the issuance of this Note have happened, existed or been performed in due time, form and manner as so required and that the indebtedness evidenced by this Note is within every debt and other limit prescribed by the Constitution and statutes of the Commonwealth of Virginia. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia, has caused this Note to be signed by the facsimile signatures of its County Administrator and a facsimile of the Seal of the County to be affixed and attested by the facsimile signature of the Treasurer of the County and this Note to be dated March 8, 1989. COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA By County Administrator County of Roanoke, Virginia Attest: By Treasurer County of Roanoke, Virginia CERTIFICATE OF AUTHENTICATION This Note is one of the Notes described in the within-mentioned Resolutions. CRESTAR BANK, as Paying Agent By Its Authorized Representative ~- 7 Reco~r~ended award of $9 million revenue anticipation note to: Central Fidelity Bank 6.98% __-- ..~ ~ _ ~ C AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 28, 1989 RESOLUTION 22889-8 APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM I - CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That that certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for February 28, 1989, designated as Item I - Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 11, inclusive, as follows: 1. Confirmation of Committee Appointment to the Court Service Unit Advisory Council/Youth and Family Services Advisory Board 2. App~e~el-ef-Raffle-Permit-few-tie-Eave-Sp~iae~ depeees- 3. Adoption of Resolution of Appreciation to the Honorable Jack B. Coulter, Judge of the 23rd Judicial Circuit. 4. Authorization to grant 40' easement to Appalachian Power Company. 5. Acceptance of a 10-foot water line easement being dedicated by Dominion Bank. 6. Request for acceptance of Huntridge Road and Britany Road in the Va. Department of Transportation Secondary System. 7. Request for acceptance of Kildeer circle and Falcon Ridge Road into the Va. Department of Transportation Secondary System. 8. Acceptance of water and sewer facilities serving Section No. 2, Huntridge 9. Acknowledgment from the Virginia Department of Tansportation that the following roads have been accepted into the Secondary System: a. 0.11 miles of Fox Ridge Road b. 0.40 miles of Peregrine Crest Circle c. 0.25 miles of Fox Ridge Road d. 0.15 miles of Silver Fox Road 10. Acceptance of sewer facilities serving White Subdivision. 11. Acceptance of a sanitary sewer easement being donated by Velma G. Edwards. 2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this resolution. On motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by Supervisor Robers with Item 2 removed, and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: `- ~_ Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors 3/2/89 CC: Clifford Craig, Utility Director Phillip Henry, Engineering Director Paul Mahoney, County Attorney File l .~' i- ~1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 28, 1989 RESOLUTION APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM I - CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That that certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for February 28, 1989, designated as Item I - Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 11, inclusive, as folloaws: 1. Confirmation of Committee Appointment to the Court Service Unit Advisory Council/Youth and Family Services Advisory Board 2. Approval of Raffle Permit for the Cave Spring Jaycees. 3. Adoption of Resolution of Appreciation to the Honorable Jack B. Coulter, Judge of the 23rd Judicial Circuit. 4. Authorization to grant 40' easement to Appalachian Power Company. 5. Acceptance of a 10-foot water line easement being dedicated by Dominion Bank. 6. Request for acceptance of Huntridge Road and Britany Road in the Va. Department of Transportation Secondary System. 7. Request for acceptance of Kildeer circle and Falcon Ridge Road into the Va. Department of Transportation Secondary System. 8. Acceptance of water and sewer facilities serving Section No. 2, Huntridge ~ ~~ 1~ 9. Acknowledgment from the Virginia Department of Tansportation that the following roads have been accepted into the Secondary System: a. 0.11 miles of Fox Ridge Road b. 0.40 miles of Peregrine Crest Circle c. 0.25 miles of Fox Ridge Road d. 0.15 miles of Silver Fox Road 10. Acceptance of sewer facilities serving White Subdivision. 11. Acceptance of a sanitary sewer easement being donated by Velma G. Edwards. 2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this resolution. ACTION # A-22889-8.a ITEM NUMBER~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: February 28, 1989 AGENDA ITEM: Confirmation of Committee Appointment to the Court Service Unit Advisory Council/Youth and Family Services Board COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND The following nomination was made at the previous board meeting and must now be confirmed by the Board of Supevisors. The nominee has agreed to serve. Court Service Advisory Board uncil/Youth and Family Services Supervisor Johnson nominated Gary Minter to serve a two-year term replacing Marilyn Morehead. His term will expire March 22, 1990. SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: /y Mary Allen Elmer C. Hodge Deputy Clerk County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved (x) Motion by• Harry C. Nickens/Richard No Yes A Denied ( ) W. Robers Garrett x _ Received ( ) Johnson x _ Referred McGraw x _ To Nickens x _ Robers x _ cc: File Court Service Unit Advisory Council/Youth and Family Services Advisory Board File Unit Adviso O~ ROANp~~ a ~ ~ A 2 ~ 7 = J a 18 '~° 88 SFSQUICENTENN~P~ A Beauti~u/ Beginning COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE March 6, 1989 LEE GARRETT. CHAIRMAN WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT RICHARD W. ROBERS. VICE-CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT STEVEN A. MCGRAW CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT Ms. Dawn Cairns 1929 Denniston Avenue Roanoke, Virginia 24015 Dear Ms. Cairns: The Cave Spring Jaycees application for a Raffle Permit for February 25, 1989, was considered by the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Meeting at their meeting on February 28, 1989. After discussion, this matter was tabled by the supervisors until County Attorney Paul Mahoney makes a study of the legalities concerning the application. As you are aware, the application was not submitted in sufficient time for approval before the raffle was held. There is also some question as to whether "Casino Night" constitutes a true raffle. The Cave Spring Jaycees check for $25.00 will be held until such time as the board makes a decision which we anticipate will be at the March 14, 1989 regularly scheduled Board Meeting. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or Paul Mahoney, County Attorney. Sincerely, ~• Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors bjh cc: Paul Mahoney, County Attorney Skip Burkart, Commonwealth Attorney Wayne Compton, Commissioner of Revenue C~nixnt~ n~ ~vttnnke BOARD OF SUPERVISORS P.O. BOX 29800 ROA'NOKE. VIRGINIA 24018-0798 (703) 772-2004 C~ aOaNp~, F A ~- ti A Z v a 18 ruq% 88 SFSQUlCENTENN~P~ A B[auhu/Bcginning PAUL M.MAHONEY COUNTY ATTORNEY \~~ ~~~n~ ~ ~ ~ OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ATTORNEY March 6, 1989 JOSEPH 8. OBENSHAIN SENIOR ASSISTANTCOUNTY ATTORNEY Francis W.Burkart III, Esquire Commonwealth's Attorney County of Roanoke Roanoke County Courthouse Salem, VA 24153 Dear Skip: SARAH A. RICE ASSISTANT COUNTY ATTORNEY At the February 28, 1989, meeting of the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors, the Board considered an application from the Cave Spring Jaycees for a permit to conduct a raffle. Enclosed you will find a copy of the application for this permit submitted by this applicant. You will note that this application was signed on February 16, 1989, and the raffle was held on February 25, 1989. The Board tabled consid- eration of this request until certain legal issues could be resolved. Since bingo games and raffles are strictly regulated by Section 18.2- 340.1, et seq. of the Code of Virginia, I am requesting on behalf of the Board of Supervisors your assistance in addressing these legal issues. As you are aware, any person violating the provisions of this ordinance or the state enabling legislation shall be guilty of a Class 1 misdemeanor. The Board is concerned with the legality of approving a permit after. the "raffle" has already occurred. Would the Board's action constitute an acceptance of or participation in illegal activity? Since this organization apparently proceeded with holding its raffle without a permit is it in violation of the ordinance or state law? Does retroactive approval of the permit by the Board cure this illegal- ity? Will approval of this permit application after the raffle has been held subject the Board to an accusation that it participated in an illegal transaction or that it condones an illegal transaction? The Board further inquires whether or not the proposed "casino night" of the applicant constitutes a "raffle" as defined by the County ordinance and the State Code. What are the consequences for the applicant and the County if the Board of Supervisors fails to act upon this permit application? I appreciate your assistance in this matter. The next regularly scheduled meeting of the Board of Supervisors is Tuesday, March 14, 1989. The agenda materials for Board meetings are prepared, copied P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 (703) 772-2007 ~/ Page Two March 6, 1989 " and delivered to the Board members the Friday preceding the Board meeting. If you have any questions concerning this inquiry, please do not hesitate to contact me. V truly yours, ~ne Pau ~Ma o y County Attorney PMM/sg cc: VBoard Reading File R. Wayne Compton ACTION # ITEM # .,"`" AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: February 28, 1989 AGENDA ITEM: Request for approval of a Raffle Permit from the Cave Spring Jaycees COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Cave Spring Jaycees has applied for a Raffle Permit and paid the $25.00 fee. The application has been reviewed by R. Wayne Compton, Commissioner of Revenue, and he recommends approval. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the application for a Raffle Permit be approved. SUBMITTED BY: Mary H. Allen Deputy Clerk APPROVED BY: ~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes A) Denied ( ) Garrett _ Received ( ) Johnson _ Referred McGraw _ To Nickens _ Robers ~~~ COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA COMMISSIONER OF THE REVENUE APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO CONDUCT RAFFLES OR BINGO Application is hereby made for a bingo game or raffle permit. This application is made subject to all County and State laws, ordinances, rules, and regulations now in force, or that may be enacted hereafter and which are hereby agreed to by the under- signed applicant and which shall be deemed a condition under which this permit is issued. All applicants should exercise extreme care to ensure the accura- cy of their responses to the following questions. Bingo games and raffles are strictly regulated by Title 18.2-340.1 et. sig. of the criminal statutes of the Virginia Code, and by Section 4-86 et. sec. of the Roanoke County Code. These laws authorize the County Board of Supervisors to conduct a reasonable investiga- Lion prior to granting a bingo or raffle permit. The Board has sixty days from the filing of an application to grant or deny the permit. The Board may deny, suspend, or revoke the permit of any organization found not to be in strict compliance with county and state law. Any person violating county or state regulations concerning these permits shall be guilty of a Class 1 misdemeanor. Any person who uses any part of the gross receipts from bingo or raffles for any purpose other than the lawful religious, charitable, community, or educational purposes for which the organization is specifi- cally organized, except for reasonable operating expenses, shall be guilty of a Class 6 felony. THIS APPLICATION IS FOR: (check one) RAFFLE PERMIT ~ BINGO GAMES Name of Organization Street Address Mailing Address ~Q ~~ 1-~~g~- City, State, Zip Code ~,Q~l'Ii')©~~C ,y~ a~~~~~ Purpose andAA Type of Organization ^~,~`'~~' ,(~~~'~, /. .. w _ ll When was the organization founded? `1~0~ 1 ~~ ~ Roanoke County meeting place? I ~ti~x~ Has organization been in existence in Roanoke County for two con- tinuous years? YES~_ NO Is the organization non-profit? YES /\ NO Indicate Federal Identif ieation Number # ~~ '~~1~c~cQ~~-' Attach copy of IRS Tax Exemption letter. Officers of the Organization: President: ~a~~ ~~~ Vice-President~',(,(~ ~~in~ Address : ~~ ~~ ~r~ ~~ Address : iq,~-~ r] iS ~~ ~~ Secretary: ~,~ ~~~~ Treasurer: ~/~y`~ ~~'t~`~ Address: ~V~ ~L~ry~~~~ Address: ~-f'~~~ ~~~(~,~(,~',~,~~ Member authorized to be responsible for Raffle or Bingo opera- tions: Name ~1,. ~~~~ Home Address ~a~, 1-n~-~~1 ~~~ Phone ~~'~~0 Bus . Phone ~~-'d~ A COMPLETE LIST OF THE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF CURRENT MEMBER- SHIP MUST BE FURNISHED WITH THIS APPLICATION. Specific location where Raffle or Bingo Game is to be conducted. RAFFLES: Date of Drawing ~ ~ 7~~ Time of Drawing ~~-~~~i~Y? BINGO: Days of Week & Hours of Activity: Sunday From To Monday From To Tuesday From To Wednesday From To Thursday From To Friday From To Saturday From To 2 ~'_e3„ State specifically how the proceeds from the Bingo/Raffle will be used. List in detail the planned or intended use of the proceeds. Use estimates amounts if necessary. ~~ 1~~~~ ~ `~~c-~ ~ , ~ir~-- _ c~ ~. c,~ ~ uh- a~ ~~ ~ ~~-~~ / /~2n i'n,~-~~r~ ••~..~'.,(-~`t~- Gtr' li~- ~vc,~ G~.~c..~.C... ~o ~ G~~ ~~~~ w~~ ~~~ ~~-~ ~ ~ ~ - 3 2-1 BINGO: Complete the following: Legal owner(s) of the building where BINGO is to be conducted: Name: Address: County State Zip Is the building owned by a 501-C non-profit organization? Seating capacity for each location: Parking spaces for each location: ALL RAFFLE AND BINGO APPLICANTS MUST ANSWER QUESTIONS 1 - 19 1. Gross receipts from all sources related to the operation of Bingo games or Instant Bingo by calendar quarter for prior calen- dar year period. BINGO INSTANT BINGO 1st Quarter 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter Total 1st Quarter 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter Total 2. Does your organization understand that it is a violation of law to enter into a contract with any person or firm, associa- tion, organization, partnership, or corporation of any classifica- tion whatsoever, for the purpose of organizing, managing, or con- ducting Bingo Games or Raffles? 3. Does your organization understand that it must maintain and file complete records of receipts and disbursements pertaining to Bingo games and Raffles, and that such records are subject to audit by the Commissioner of the Revenue? 4. Does your organization understand that the Commissioner of the Revenue or his designee has the right to go upon the premises on which any organization is conducting a Bingo game or raffle, to perform unannounced audits, and to secure for audit all re- cords required to be maintained for Bingo games or raffles? -cam' 4 x° ~~ 5. Does your organization understand that a Financial Report must be filed with the Commissioner of the Revenue on or before the first day of November of each calendar year for which a per- mit has been issued?_z~'~ 6. Does your organization understand that if gross receipts ex- ceed fifty thousand dollars during any calendar quarter, an addi- tional Financial Report must be filed for such quarter no later than sixty days following the last day of such quarter? S 7. Does your organization understand that the failure to file financial reports when due shall cause automatic revocation of the permit, and no such organization shall conduct any Bingo game or raffle thereafter until such report is properly filed and a new permit is obtained? 8. Does your organization understand that each Financial Report must be accompanied by a Certificate, verified under oath by the Board of Directors, that the proceeds of any Bingo game or raffle have been used for these lawful, religious, charitable, commu- nity, or educational purposes for which the organization i$ spe- cifically chartered or organized, and that the operation of Bingo games or raffles have been in accordance with the provisions of Article 1.1 of Chapter 8, Title 18.2 of the Code of Virginia?[;~'~ Does your organization understand that a one percent audit fee of the gross receipts must be paid to the County of Roanoke upon submission of the annual financial report due on or before the first of November? 10. Does your organization understand that this permit is valid only in the County of Roanoke and only at such locations, and for such dates, as are designated in the permit application? r 11. Does your organization understand that no person, excebt a bona fide member of any such organization who shall have been a member of such organization for at least ninety days prior to such participation, shall participate in the management, opera- tion, or conduct of any bingo game or raffle, and no person shall receive any remuneration for participating in management, operation, or conduct of any such game or raffle? .~~,~ L 12. Has your organization attached a check for the annual permit fee in the amount of $25.00 payable to the County of Roanoke, Virginia? 13. Does your organization understand that any organization found in violation of the County Bingo and Raffle Ordinance or §18.2- 340.10 of the Code of Virginia authorizing this permit is subject to having such permit revoked and any person, shareholder, agent, member or employee of such organization who violates the above to having such permit revoked and any person, shareholder, agent, member or employee of such organization who violates the above referenced Codes may be guilty of a felony? 5 z-~ 14. Has your organization attached a complete list of its member- ship to this application form? 15. Has your organization attached a coo_y of its bylaws to this application form? (,~'tr,~ 16. Has the organization been declared tion under the Virginia Constitution or If yes, state whether exemption is for or both and identify exempt property. hti.~Q.° exempt from property taxa- statutes? real, per onal property, 17. State the s~necific type and rpose of the organization. 18. Is this organization incorporated in Virginia? If yes, name and address of Registered Agent: 19. Is the organization registered with the Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Affairs pursuant to the Charitable Solicitations Act, Section 57-48 of the Virginia Code? (If so, attach copy of registration.) Has the organization been granted an exemption from registration by the Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Affairs? (If so, attach copy of exemption.) ALL RAFFLE APPLICANTS DESCRIBE THE ARTICLES TO BE RAFFLED, VALUE OF SUCH ARTICLES, AND PROCEED TO NOTARIZATION. Ar icle Description ~;, ~~~~~~r ~. a~- ~:sL u~l~t~,c;~n ~~1`~ICJ' (~ i! 1 I'tr~ : 1.'1 (I ~ ~~~1 i AA Cy e~~ !.j ~ , ~~ v. n ~~r~ ~'~ I~l~'~ ~~ 1 c~-~~~,t,Y~i' ~~ ~ ~` uG~~ C~ Y~~~ Fair Market Value ~~ ~`i ~ l_~ U ~~ ~( ~~s~ 6 C ~~~ ALL BINGO APPLICANTS MUST ANSWER QUESTIONS 20 - 27 BEFORE NOTARIZATION RAFFLE APPLICANTS, GO TO NOTARIZATION. 20. Does your organization understand that the bingo games shall not be conducted more frequently than two calendar days in any calendar week? 21. Does your organization understand that it is required to keep complete records of the bingo game. These records based on X18.2- 340.6 of the Code of Virginia and X4.98 of Roanoke County Code must include the following: a. A record of the date, quantity, and card value of instant bingo supplies purchased, as well as the name and address of the supplier of such instant bingo supplies, and written ,;,. invoice or receipt is also required for each purchase of in- stant bingo supplies? b. A record in writing of the dates on which Bingo is played, the number of people in attendance on each date, and the amount of receipts and prizes on each day? (These records must be retained for three years.) c. A zecord of the name and address of each individual to whom a door prize, regular or special Bingo game prize or jackpot from the playing of Bingo is awarded? d. A complete and itemized record of all receipts and disburse- ments which support, and that agree with, the quarterly-and annual reports required to be filed, and that these records must be maintained in reasonable order to permit audit? 22. Does your organization understand that instant Bingo may only be conducted at such time as regular Bingo game is in progress, and only at such locations and at such times as are specified in this application? 23. Does your organization understand that the gross receipts in the course of a reporting year from the playing of instant Bingo may not exceed 33 1/3~ of the gross receipts of an organization's Bingo operation? 24. Does your organization understand it may not sell an instant Bingo card to an individual below sixteen years of age? 25. Does your organization understand that an organization whose gross receipts from all bingo operations that exceed or are ex- pected to exceed $75,000 in any calendar year shall have been granted tax-exempt status pursuant to Section 501 C of the United States Internal Revenue Service? (Certificate must be attached.) 7 Z=~ 26. Does your organization understand that a Certificate of Occu- pancy must be obtained or be on file which authorizes this use at the proposed location? 27. Does your organization understand that awards or prize money or merchandise valued in excess of the following amounts are illegal? a. No door prize shall exceed twenty-five dollars. b. No regular Bingo or special Bingo game shall exceed One Hund- red dollars. c. No jackpot of any nature whatsoever shall exceed One Thousand Dollars, nor shalt the total amount of jackpot prizes awarded in any one calendar day exceed One Thousand Dollars. NOTARIZATION: THE FOLLOWING OATH MUST BE TAKEN BY ALL APPLICANTS T ':~r~:;y s~~ear or affirm under the penalties of perjury as set forth in §18.2 of the Code of Virginia, that all of the above statements are true to the best of my knowledge, information, and beliefs. All questions have been answered. Signed by: C~c~ Name py~~ Title Home- F~ddress Subscribed and sworn before me, this /~,~. day of,-~--~~x~~~uzi 19,4_ t, ' My commission expires: A _ RETURN THIS COMPLETED APPLICATION T0: P r Notary Public COMMISSIONER OF THE REVENUE P.0. Box 20409 Roanoke, VA 24018-0513 ~`~~~ 1~~~'7l')~SfZ'l? 8 ~~ NOT VALID UNLESS COUNTERSIGNED The above application, having been found in due form, is approved and issued to the applicant to have effect until December 31st of this calendar year. Date Commissioner of a Revenue The above application is not approved. Date Commissioner of the Revenue 9 JAYCEE STATE AND CHAPTER GROUP EXEMPTION The United' States Jaycees have a group exemption under Section 501(c)(4) of the Internal Revenue Code. All state and local Jaycee organizations arc cliyible t.o be included under this exemption. To be added to the group exemption, the following information is required. Send this information to: The U . S . Jaycees P.O. Box 7 Tulsa, OK 74121-0007 Attention: Director of Finance LEGAL NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: STREET ADDRESS: STATE AND CHAPTER NUMBER: _ _ - _ _ _ _ EMPLOYER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER (EIN): _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ANNUAL GROSS RECEIPTS: (1) OVER $25,000 (2) UNDER $25,000 OFFICER TITL After your state/chapter record has been updated, we will send you a confirmation letter which will give the tax exempt group number. You will also receive a copy of our IRS group determination letter which will explain your IR5 requirements for annual reporting. If you do not have an Employer Identification Number, submit Form SS-4 to the Internal Revenue Service and one will be issued. This takes about four weeks. Gross receipts are all receipts. It would include dues, donations, sponsorships, contributions, sales, special projects, and anything else F roducing income. If gross receipts are over $25,000 you are required to file an Annual Information Return -Form 990. Please complete the application in full or it will be returned to you for completion. ARTHUR ANDERSEN ~c CO. SUITE 1900 ONE WILLIAMS CENTER TULSA, OKLAHOMA 74172 (918) 587-2571 February 5, 1988 Mr. Carl Clayton United States Jaycees Post Office Box 7 Tulsa, Oklahoma 74101 Dear Mr. Clayton: The Revenue Act of 1987 provided two new disclosure requirements for exempt organizations. New section 6113 provides that each fund-raising solicitation by a tax-exempt organization, other than a charity or 501(c)(3) organization, must contain a conspicuous and easily recognizable statement acknowledging that contributions or gifts to the organization are nondeductible as charitable contributions for Federal income tax purposes. This provision is effective for solicitations made after January 31, 1988. A penalty of $1,000 per day ($10,000 maximum per year) is imposed for each day there is a failure to comply. A higher penalty, not subject to a maximum amount, applies if the failure to comply is intentional. This disclosure requirement applies to a solicitation if: (1) the soliea~in(2) organizations normally have gross receipts in excess of $100,000 per y , the solicitation is part of a coordinated fund-raising campaign soliciting more than 10 persons during the year, and (3) the solicitation is made in written form, by television or radio, or by telephone. Informal advice from the IRS indicates the disclosure requirements on fund raising applies to bills for membership dues as well as other types of solicitations for funds. Thus, bills for membership dues or any solicitation of a 501(c)(4) organization like the U. S. Jaycees must include an express statement conspicuously on its face that discloses the nondeductibility of such payments as charitable contributions. No statement is required on solicitations by a 501(c)(3) organization like the U. S. Jaycees Foundation, as these donations are deductible as charitable contributions. At your request, we are providing the following: - Charts are attached that reflect all organizations exempt under Section 501, including a description of the organizations, their activities and whether or not donations to such organizations are deductible as charitable contributions. ARTHUR ANDERSEN 8c CO. Mr. Carl Clayton - 2 - February 5, 1988 - Suggested wording for new disclosure requirement that should be placed conspicuously on each solicitation, dues statement, or billing: "Your contribution to the U. S. Jaycees in support of our annual membership drive is nondeductible as a charitable contribution for Federal income tax purposes." As I mentioned at the beginning of this letter, the 1987 Act provided two new disclosure requirements. The second requirement provides that any tax-exempt organization that offers to sell or solicits money for routine services or specific information that can easily be obtained for free or a nominal fee from the Federal government must make an express statement that the information or services can be so obtained. This disclosure requirement does not apply to providing information or services that are not routine. The provision applies to offers and solicitations made after January 31, 1988. Penalties will apply if failure to disclose is due to intentional disregard of this requirement. Do not hesitate to call if you have any questions with regard to these disclosure requirements. Very truly yours, ARTHUR ANDERSEN & CO. By /' f~Qf'~- Martha J. ord mm Enclosures Page # 1 CAVE SPRING JAYCEE'S October 8, 1988 CACKERHAM, GIGI 3325 FOREST CT. Roanoke, VA 24018 ADAMOWSKI, EUGENE H 989-1006 3367 FOREST RIDGE RD. SW W 748-4505 Roanoke, VA 24018 AKERS, JEFFERY H. H 774-0902 3728 HYDE PARK DR. W 774-5706 Roanoke, VA 24018 ASSENAT, JULIE H 989-1018 5129-G OVERLAND DR. SW. W 989-3300 Roanoke, VA 24014 BAUMOEL, WALTER H 774-7763 2142 PELHAM DR W - ROANOKE, VA 24018 BENNETT, BONNIE H 989-6188 103 WINDWARD DRIVE W 343-9404 ROANOKE, VA 24014 BENTLEY, KAREN 6072 ORIOLE LANE ROANOKE, VA 24018 BIXBY, LEIGH ANN 3747 RED FOX DRIVE NW ROANOKE, VA 24017 BLANKENSHIP, MICHELLE 4000-H ROXBURY LANE SW ROANOKE, VA 24018 BOEHLING, BOB 2624 AVENEL AVE. ROANOKE, VA 24015 BOEHLING, DEBBIE 3570 BERRY HILL DRIVE ROANOKE, VA 24018 BOEHLING, THOMAS 3570 BERRY HILL DRIVE ROANOKE, VA 24018 CAIRNS, DAWN 1929 DENNISTON AVE. ROANOKE, VA 24015 CANi1ADAY , ROGER P.O. BOX 831 SALEM, VA 24153 H 989-1699 W H 344-2306 W H 380-2118 W CHEWNING, JAMES E. H 7445 STARLIGHT LANE W BOONES MILL, VA 24077 CHURCH, RICK P. H 344-4509 1712 GREENWOOD DR. W 343-0155 Roanoke, VA 24015 H 989-0878 CRICKENBERGER, PATRICIA H W 344-7755 3028 HEREFORD RD. SW W Roanoke, VA 24018 H 345-2628 W H 774-7681 W 387-0401 H 344-6120 W 982-0311 H 989-2128 W 985-4400 H 989-2128 W 981-1251 BURKE, ROB H 982-2828 3773 SOUTHWAY DR. APT #17W 366-5285 ROANOKE, VA 24014 CUNDIFF, PHYLLIS 3621 BUCKNER RD. SW ROANOKE, VA 24015 DAVIS, DAVID 7205 CROSSTIMBERS TR ROANOKE, VA 24019 DILLON, BRENDA RT. 3 BOX 538-F MONETA, VA 24121 DIXON, WILLIAM 2206 MONTAUK ROAD #9 ROANOKE, VA 24017 DOUTHETT, DAVID 3367 FOREST RIDGE RD ROANOKE, VA 24018 ECKERMANN, DANIEL 3117-H HONEYWOOD LN. ROANOKE, VA 24014 BYROM, DOUGLAS H 989-5642 ELLIOT, BRUCE 5018 OAKLEIGH AVE. W 985-3207 6916 BUCK CROSSING DR. ROANOKE, VA 24018 ROANOKE, VA 24014 Page # 2 CAVE SPRING JAYCEE'S October 8, 1988 EVERHART, CYNTHIA H 989-5294 HASH, HEATHER H W 7209 WOODS CROSSING DR. W 344-4700 1914 WESTOVER AVE. Roanoke, VA 24014 Roanoke, VA 24015 SHARI FELTS H 989-2168 HAUSER, BONNIE H 344-2306 , 3131-B HONEYWOOD LN W 981-2937 1929 DENNISTON AVE. W ROANOKE, VA 24014 ROANOKE, VA 24015 FRANKLIN, WILLIAM H 345-3785 HENLEY, NANCY H W 345-0926 342-5710 304 COVERTRY LANE W 1818 BELLEVIEW RD. Roanoke, VA 24014 ROANOKE, VA 24015 FRAZIER, DEBBIE H 389-9698 HOLLAND, MARY R APT 1-B H W 774-6739 982-0200 2076 LAWYER DRIVE W 387-2481 5260 CROSSBOW C SALEM, VA 24153 ROANOKE, VA 24014 GLASGOW, KEVIN H 989-9438 HOLLAR, MICHAEL E. H W 343-2712 345-1001 3212 BRANDYWINE AVE SW W 985-4443 3020 RICHARD AVE. NE ROANOKE, VA 24018 ROANOKE, VA 24012 GOYER, DONNA H 343-1151 HUNTER, EDDIE 6710 OLEANDER CIRCLE H W 563-7212 1410 LORI DR. ROANOKE, VA 24014 W ROANOKE, VA 24019 GARY GOYER H 343-1151 JAYARAMAN, RADHA H 989-4612 , 1410 LORI DR W 3131 I HONEYWOOD LN. W ROANOKE, VA 24014 ROANOKE, VA 24014 GREBLUNAS, JOE H 989-4436 JOHNSON, MICKEY H W 342-2350 982-0021 6032 Oriole Lane W - 1722 MEMORIAL AVE Roanoke, VA 24018 ROANOKE, VA 24015 HALL, BO H 366-9288 JONES, BONNIE H W 774-8180 389-8511 2206 MONTAUK ROAD ~9 W 3329-K CIRCLEBROOK DR. ROANOKE, VA 24017 ROANOKE, VA 24014 KAREN HALL H 772-0037 JOYCE, ROBIN H 989-3903 , 5149 OVERLAND DR. W 5483 WINTERSET DR. SW W ROANOKE, VA 24014 Roanoke, VA 24014 HAMMAKER, SHARON H 774-4143 KEHRER, PAUL H W 989-469? 985-299] 3521 Normandy Ln. SW W 2601 ALBERTA AVE Roanoke, VA 24018 ROANOKE, VA 24015 HAMMETT, SAM H 345-3909 KELLER, GEORGE H W 774-043`_ 985-281. 3632 DOGWOOD LN W 981-3886 3518 PILOT AVE ROANOKE, VA 24015 ROANOKE, VA 24018 CHIP HARRIS H 985-0616 KENNEDY, BRAD H 343-008( , 1615 CHESTERFIELD ST. W 985-2859 2624 AVENEL AVE W ROANOKE, VA 24015 ROANOKE, VA 24015 Page # 3 KETTERER, GREGG 2633 SUMMETT RIDGE ROANOKE, VA 24012 KEY, DAVID C. 2421 FAIRWWAY DR. ROANOKE, VA 24015 KLINK, CHIP 2707 GARDEN CITY BLVD ROANOKE, VA 24014 LANCASTER, GLENN 46 SUMMITT WAY DR. Roanoke, VA 24014 MADDOX, RHONDA K. 4689 BUCKRUN SQUARE ROANOKE, VA 24014 MAIDEN, SANDRA 4620 BUCKRUN RD. ROANOKE, VA 24014 MARKS, PETE 3332-C Circlebrook Dr. Roanoke, VA 24014 MASON, GREG 3417 LONDONDERRY LN. ROANOKE, VA 24018 MINNIEAX, MARTY 379 HIGHLAND AVE. SW Roanoke, VA 24016 MINTER, GARY 829 DEXTER LN. ROANOKE, VA 24019 CAVE SPRING JAYCEE'S October 8, 1988 H 977-1730 NEAL, KELLEIGH A H 989-6226 W 345-7809 3108 - J HONEYWOOD LN SW W 981-2816 ROANOKE, VA 24014 H 982-1508 NEWCOMB, ELLEN H 389-1031 W 772-0500 515 YORKSHIRE STREET #10 W 380-5000 SALEM, VA 24153 H 981-0600 NORTH, PHILLIP H 387-2001 W 774-3296 2429 POSTOAK RD. ~^1 SALEM, VA 24153 H OMER, TOM H 772-3040 W 2619 WEST HAMPTON AVE W Roanoke, VA 24015 H 989-5411 *OWENS, ENMITY H W 563-6258 8317 Hood Dr. W Richmond, VA 23227 H 774-6619 PARKER, BRYAN H 989-9519 W 981-2991 3959-31 BERRY LANE W 774-7004 ROANOKE, VA 24018 H 774-1402 PEERY, ART H 342-9211 y,7 2056 WESTOVER AVE W 344-9201 ROANOKE, VA 24015 H 989-1182 PETRANE, Janice H 774-6427 W 342-9904 104 Houndschase Lane W Roanoke, VA 24014 H 344-9026 *PETTIPAS, LISA H #304W 362-6332 4549 Logsdon Dr. W Annandale, VA 22003 H 366-5401 PRUETT, DAVID H 774-0257 W 989-3513 4117 WOODVALE DRIVE W 345-093E ROANOKE, VA 24018 MITCHELL, DONNA L. H 989-6226 3108 - J HONEYWOOD LANE W 344-5571 ROANOKE, VA 24014 MONROE, DAVID N. H 389-1447 1616 LANCING DRIVE APT #2W 345-0936 SALEM, VA 24153 MONROE, TAMERA H 389-1447 1616 LANCING DRIVE APT #2W 989-7156 SALEM, VA 24153 PRUETT, PAULA H 774-0251 4117 WOODVALE DRIVE W 380-5000 ROANOKE, VA 24018 PUCKETT, SANDY H 345-404_ 314 ATHERLY ST. W ROANOKE, VA 24012 REEP, DONNA H 384-664`. 3721 CARVINS COVE RD. W 983-812" SALEM, VA 24153 Page # 4 CAVE SPRING JAYCEE'S October 8, 1988 *RICKARD, DAVE H - SPELL, JOHN H 342-3579 P. O. Box 222 W 532 WALNUT AVE. APT #4 W 345-0936 Strasburg, VA 22657 Roanoke, VA 24016 ROBERTS, MIMI H 989-0013 SPELL, SHERRI H - 3361 FOREST RIDGE ROAD W 989-0013 532 WALNUT AVE. APT #4 W - ROANOKE, VA 24018 Roanoke, VA 24016 KATE ROBEY H 343-6052 ST. CLAIR, CINDY H 982-2828 , 2331 BROADWAY RD. APT #2 W 343-7562 3773 SOUTHWAY DR. #17 W Roanoke, VA 24014 Roanoke, VA 24014 RORER, NANCY H 989-0391 STRAKA, GAIL H 774-1837 4108 CHAPARAL DR. W 208 SUMMIT WAY W Roanoke, VA 24018 ROANOKE, VA 24014 RUSMISEL, PAT H 989-8770 SWANSON, NATE H 342-1735 2610 DOVETAIL CIR W 774-0071 2231 WESTOVER AVE. W ROANOKE, VA 24018 ROANOKE, VA 24015 ASHOK SANKAR H 362-5743 SWORD, NEIL H 989-9483 , 3053-H Ordway Dr. NW W 387-8517 3318-A CIRCLEBROOK DRIVE W 774-0071 Roanoke, VA 24017 ROANOKE, VA 24014 BOB SCHUG H TALTON, STEVE H 772-0676 , 3017 J. Ardway Dr. NW W 3727 BUCKINGHAM DRIVE W 387-1213 Roanoke, VA 24017 ROANOKE, VA 24018 THOM SCHWENDEMAN H 362-5162 THOMAS, SUSAN H 343-7562 , 109 NORFOLK AVE. W 343-5707 5129-G OVERLAND DR. SW W 989-1018 ROANOKE, VA 24011 Roanoke, VA 24014 PATTIE SCOTT H 774-2583 THOMPSON, TIM H 772-1615 , 3550 TIMBERLINE W 342-2100 3543 VIEW AVE. SW W 362-4500 ROANOKE, VA 24018 Roanoke, VA 24018 RANDY *SHELTON H TINSLEY, KERRI H 344-2306 , 512 Wadsworth Dr. W 1929 DENNISTON AVE. W 981-2937 Richmond, VA 23236 ROANOKE, VA 24015 SLEDD, BILL H 774-2974 TRABUE, KAREN H 774-0780 5940 MERRIMAN RD W 3229 WINTERBERRY DRIVE W ROANOKE, VA 24018 ROANOKE, VA 24018 JOHN SLEDD H 345-4145 VANCE, MARK H 772-0283 , 5468 HIGHFIELDS RD. W 981-4817 3613 PEAKWOOD DR. W 344-5563 ROANOKE, VA 24018 ROANOKE, VA 24014 SMITH, SHERRY H 774-9775 VARNEY, MICHAEL R. H 242-015 3168 BERRY LANE W 989-8984 1926 HOPE RD. W ROANOKE, VA 24018 Roanoke, VA 24018 Page # 5 CAVE SPRING JAYCEE'S October 8, 1988 NAUGHT, JOHN H 989-7097 3110-G HONEYWOOD LN W ROANOKE, VA 24014 VICKERS, ROY H P. O. Box 10694 W Blacksburg, VA 24062 WADE, RICK T. H 563-5631 2633 CEDARHURST AVE. W 387-3911 Roanoke, VA 24012 WAGNER, RICK H 772-0641 3309 - L CIRCLEBROOK DR. W 989-3618 ROANOKE, VA 24014 WARD, DON H 989-5208 5318 LAKELAND DR. ~^1 ROANOKE, VA 24018 WEAVER, STEPHEN E. H 992-5115 106 TINKERVIEW DRIVE W CLOVERDALE, VA 24077 WEISS, VICKI H 989-8738 743 WINDSOR AVE SW W 989-2500 ROANOKE, VA 24015 WILLIAMS, ROB H 774-0522 5350 ROSELAND W Roanoke, VA 24018 WINGATE, GREG H 380-2172 6854 CAMPBELL DRIVE W 772-2014 SALEM, VA 24153 WOO, CAROL H 3018 Trevis Lane j^1 Midlothian, VA 23112 ZIMMERMAN, KATHY H 989-5143 3109 - I JONEYWOOD LN. W Roanoke, VA 24015 t CONSTITUTION OF THE CAVE SPRING JAYCEES, INC. ARTICLE I - NAME AND AFFILIATION Section 1. The name of this organization shall be the Cave Spring Jaycees, Incorporated. Section 2. This organization is affiliated with the Virginia Jaycees, the United States Jaycees, and the Junior Chamber International, and subject to the Constitution and By-Laws of these bodies insofar as their affect, and prescribe the functions of the Jaycees and are not in conflict with this Constitution. ARTICLE II - PURPOSE Section 1. The purpose of this organization shall be to provide for its members the opportunities for leadership training, civic service, and expan- sion of ideas through responsibility. Section 2. The further purpose of this organization shall be to promote the welfare of the Cave Spring area and its citizens through active and constructive projects that will better the whole community as an industrial, commercial, educational and cultural center. ARTICLE III - MEMBERSHIP Section 1. Any young person of good character between.~he ages of eighteen (~$)~and thirty-five (~),~ both inclusive, is eligible for active member- ship in the organization with full privileges thereof, provided he or she meets the require- ments as prescribed by the By-Laws. Section 2. Any young person of good character of any age, is eligible for an associate membership in the organization with full privileges thereof, provided he or she meets the requirements as prescribed by the By-Laws. 7 ARTICLE IV - GOVERNMENT Section 1. The government of this organization, as provided in the By-laws shall be vested in the Board of Directors, consisting of not fewer than two nor more than, Directors, and the State Director plus the immediate Past President, and the present officers. Said officers shall j''{\rG~"~'~ be the President, ~1r~ Press ~p ~+(~ -, Individual Development Vice President, ~:~ Vln Community Development Vice President, Secretary, Cp~f~ and Treasurer. Section 2. The officers and Directors of this organization shall be elected in the manner, and for the terms of office prescribed by the By-laws, and shall hold office for the terms of their office, or until their successors are duly elected and installed. ARTICLE V - QUORUMS Section 1. Any normal business conducted by this organization shall be by majority vote of the members present at any meeting. A quorum of the Board of Directors shall be a majority of the Board of Directors. ARTICLE VI - AMENDMENTS Section 1. These Articles of Association may be amended at any regularly scheduled meeting by a two-thirds vote of those present, provided the Board of Directors have been notified in person and in writing of the proposed amendment at any Board Meeting prior to a ten day notification of the membership by mail. 8 BY-LAWS OF THE CAVE SPRING JAYCEES, INC. ARTICLE I - MEMBERSHIP Section 1. All applications for membership must be spon-• sered by a member in good standing. Applications must be submitted to the Membership Committee in writing. Section 2. No applicant for membership shall be inducted until his dues for the current year have been paid. Section 3. All applicants for membership and members shall be or shall take steps to be qualified to vote in public elections. Section 4. Any member missing four consecutive meetings, or who has failed to support the functions of the organization may be dropped from membership at the discretion of the Board of Directors. ARTICLE II - DUES Section 1. The annual dues for all~e~guel~r~sme bers of this ~1~ annually Section 2. A member`s anniversary dues are due and payable thirty (30) days prior to his anniversary month. Any member whose dues and assessments are in arrears for a period of thirty (30) days shall be suspended from membership at the dis- cretion of the Board of Directors. Any member whose dues and assessments are in arrears for a period of sixty-one (61) days shall cease to be a member at the discretion of the Board of Directors. Notice of dues and assessments payable shall be given to members by the Treasurer thirty (30) days before the date due and payable. Rein- stated members dropped for non-payment of dues and assessments shall be considered new members and shall be subject to ARTICLE I, Section 2, above. organization shall be paya The annual dues for all Associate Members of this organization shall be $25.00, payable annually. 9 Section 3. Revenues from sources other than those defined in this article may be raised as recommended by the Board of Directors, and approved by the organi- zation. Section 4. There will be no assessment unless two-thirds of the members present approve the assessment. Section 5. An associate member may not hold an elected office, vote in elections, or vote on any chapter business. All other rights and priviledges are applicable. Section 6. All applicants must be accepted by a majority vote of the general membership at a regularly scheduled meeting. ARTICLE III - GOVERNMENT Section 1. The Directors and Officers shall constitute the Board of Directors. Section 2. The Board of Directors shall have general super- vision of the affairs of the organization between the business meetings and shall direct the regular business. Section 3. Funds of the organization shall be withdrawn from the bank or banks with which they are on deposit by the joint signatures of any two of the following: President, Treasurer, or any other Vice President. Section 4. Vacancies of the Board of Directors, or in any office, shall be filled by majority action of the Board of Directors. Such appointees shall serve until the next regular election. Section 5. No action, representation, or resolution of the Board of Directors shall be offered to the public as the sense of the organization without a majority vote of the members present during any regulary scheduled meeting. ARTICLE IV - ELECTIONS Section 1. At the annual election there shall be e~aeda-gen ~,~~~_ the following order: Prei ~ e~t, Gtaa~ ~~~e~~Develo ment Vice ment Vice President, I p President,`'~Community Development Vice President, State Director, Secretary, Treasurer, and not io .'.2~ fewer than (2) or more than Lirectors. No officer shall be eligible to succeed himself in that office. A Director is not an officer. Section 2. No less than thirty t30) days prior to the annual election, the President shall appoint, with the approval of the Board of Directors, an Election Committee of not less than four (4) members. No member of the Committee can stand for office. Section 3. No less than thirty (30) days prior to the election, any member of record, according to the most recent published roster of the membership and its addendum as published by the Secretary, shall have paid all outstanding monies owed the organization for any reason in order to be considered a member in good standing. A member must be in good standing to vote or stand for office. The election Committee shall publish the eligible voter list at least (15) days prior to the election. Section 4. The election Committee shall solicit two (2) or more nominees for each office, and for each position on the Board of Directors. The Committee shall mail a list of its nominees to the membership at least three (3) days prior to the regular membership meeting on the second Monday of April of each year. Section 5. The Election Committee shall submit its report at the regular membership meeting on the second Monday of April. At the same meeting, the Election Chairman shall call for any nominations from the floor. Section 6. Voting shalt be by individual ballot. No person shall cast more than one ballot. Absentee ballots shall be allowed at the discretion of the Election Committee provided the nature of the absence is job related, personal, death in the immediate family, or due to hospitalization. Under no circum- stances can an absentee ballot be obtained by the Election Committee less than twenty-four (24) hours prior to the commencement of the election meeting. Section 7. Officers and Directors shall take office on June 1, of each year, and shall serve for the term for which elected, or until their successors have been duty elected and installed. ARTICLE V - MEETINGS Section 1. Regular meetings of this organization shall be held on the second and fourth Mondays of each month, unless otherwise ordered by the organization or the Board of Directors. Section 2. The annual election meeting of this organization shall be held on the second Monday of April. Section 3. Meetings of the Board of Directors shall be held at pre-arranged dates at the call of the President. Section 4. Special meetings of the Board of Directors shall be called by the President or Secretary at the request of at least two members of the Board of Directors. Section 5. Robert's Rules governing rules meetings of the parts, except a of Order Revised shall be the for all proceedings of all organization and its component s provided in these By-Laws. ARTICLE VI - DUTIES OF OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS Section 1. The duties of officers shall be as is prescribed by the Robert's Rules of Order Revised. The President shall preside over all meetings of the organization and the Board of Directors, and shall be an ex officio member of all committees, except the Election Committee. He shall appoint to the Board of Directors, with the consent of the voting members of the Board, such non-voting members as required to aid the orderly conduct of business of the organization. Such officers may be, but are not limited to, Parlimentarian, Legal Council, Chaplin, Sergeant at Arms, and the Editor of the chapter publication. Section 2. The ~~~e'' Vice Presidents, any of whom shall preside (by appointment of the President) at the membership meetings and at the Board of Directors meetings in the absence of the President. Section 3. The immediate Past President shall serve as the Chairman of the Board of Directors, with vote, but shall not preside at any meetings of the Board. He shall also serve as a member of the Executive Committee with vote. 12 Section 4. The Executive Committee of the Board of Directors shall consist of the President, the~~i ~«~ L~~ Vice Presidents, and the Chairman of the Board. This Committee shall meet in closed session, without minutes, at the call of the President. The Committee shall select the recipients of meritorious awards, except those conferred by special awards committees. Section 5. The Secretary shall give notice of all regular and special meetings and keep a permanent record of the minutes of such meetings. He or she shall be custodian of all official records of the organization. Immediately upon assuming office, the Secretary shall publish an accurate roster of the membership of the organization which will constitute those persons eligible to vote on the business of the organization. He or she shall also publish each month, as is necessary, those new members inducted according to ARTICLE I of the By-Laws, and those members dropped in accordance with the By-Laws. Section 6. The Treasurer shall issue notices of dues and assessments payable and be responsible for the collection thereof, keep the books of the organ- ization, disburse funds at the discretion of the Board of Directors, and shall report in detail at the annual meeting, and at other such times as directed, on the financial conditions of the organization. He or she shall submit a detailed written report at least once each quarter, and shall submit a written detailed report at the end of his or her term of office. The Treasurer shall report at each Board Meeting those members whose dues and assessments have been in arrears for a period of thirty (30) days, and are therefore, subject to suspension. He or she shall also report those members who are in arrears for dues and assessments for a period of sixty-one (61) days, and therefore, cease to be a member of the organization at the discretion of the Board of Directors. Section 7. The State Director shall be responsible for the orderly exchange of information between other affiliated organizations and this organization, including, but not limited to such records of the committees of this organization as may be submitted for competition within affiliates. Additionally, he or she shall serve together with the President or his agent, as the representative 13 of the organization on the Board of Directors of the Virginia Jaycees. Section 8. The Directors shall be responsible for their assigned portions of the activities of the organization. They shall be responsible for the nomination of committee Chairman, Co-Chairman, and committee members to the President, and for the coordination of committee functions deemed proper and necessary to fulfill the objectives of the organization. Section 9. No officer or Director shall hold more than one (1) office on the Board of Directors. This pertains to voting positions only. ARTICLE VII - COMMITTEES Section 1. During the first business meeting in June, the Board of Directors shall present, in the form of a main motion, term of office. The Plan shall delineate the projects and committees proper and necessary to fulfill the objectives of the organization, their proposed budgets, and the total budget of the organization. Furthermore, the Board shall present in the Plan the assigned responsibilities of the Directors of the organ- ization. The Plan, once approved, may be amended in any manner, at any regulary scheduled business meeting upon proper motion by any member, proper second, and a majority vote of the members present. Section 2. All committees, their Chairmen, Co-Chairmen, and members shall be appointed by the President, subject to approval of the Board of Directors. ARTICLE VIII - DELEGATIONS Section 1. Delegations or steering committees thereof shall be appointed by the President to represent the organization at any convention, meeting, or assembly, as may be necessary. ARTICLE IX - COOPERATION WITH OTHER CIVIC CLUBS Section 1. It shall be the endeavor of this group to avoid any unnecessary duplication of the efforts of other organizations; at the same time, main- tain a spirit of cooperation and offering a coordination of efforts where desirable and practical. 14 ARTICLE X - LIMITATIONS OF ACTIVITIES Section 1. Any partisan political activity is foreign to the purpose and spirit of this organization. It shall not, as an entity, endorse any candidate for political office or otherwise concern itself with partisan politics. ARTICLE XI - AMENDMENTS Section 1. These By-Laws may be amended at any regularly scheduled meeting by a two-thirds vote of those present, provided the Board of Directors have been notified in person and in writing of the proposed amendment at any Board of Directors have been notified in person and in writing of the proposed amendment at any Board meeting prior to a ten (10) day notification of the member- ship by mail. ARTICLE XII - SUCCESSION OF OFFICERS Section 1. The chair of succession of officers should the President be unable to fulfill his term for any reason, shall be: a) Chapter Management Vice President b) Individual Development Vice President c) Community Development Vice President d) State Director e) Secretary f) Treasurer 15 ORGANIZATION CHART FOR CAVE SPRING JAYCEES MEMBERSHIP BOARD OF DIRECTORS PRESIDENT CHARIMAN OF ~*******~*~'~~'~~'*~~'**~ SECRETARY THE BOARD STATE DIRECTOR *****-~-~**~**~'***~'*** TREASURER ~ ~ ~ ~ * ~ CHAPTER MANAGEMENT INDIVIDUAL DEVELOPMENT COMMUNIT Y DEVELDPMENI VICE PRESIDENT VICE PRESIDENT VICE PRESIDENT ~ ~ ~ * * ~ C M I D DIRECTOR C D DIRECTOR DIRECTOR - 1 NO. 1 N0. 1 * * ~ * * ~ * * ~ C M I D DIRECTOR C D DIRECTOR DIRECTOR - 2 NO. 2 NO. 2 * ~ ~ * * ~ * * ~ C M I D DIRECTOR C D DIRECTOR DIRECTOR - 3 NO. 3 N0. 3 C M DIRECTOR NO. 4 CAVE SPRING JAYCEES, INC. OFFICERS PRESIDENT: The President shall preside at all meetings of the membership and the Board of Directors, insuring that they are conducted in an orderly and businesslike manner that protects the rights of the individual member while efficiently disposing of the business at hand. He shall abide by all rules for the chairman as prescribed by Parliamentary Law. CHAPTER MANAGEMENT VICE PRESIDENT: The Chairman Management Vice President, through his assigned directors and their respective chairmen, shall be responsible for the chapter operations including, but not limited to the following: - chapter publications - constitution and by-laws - public relations - meetings and programs - orientations - ways and means - membership recruitment He shall also perform all other duties and obligations in his capacity as directed by the President. INDIVIDUAL DEVELOPMENT VICE PRESIDENT: The Individual Development Vice President, through assigned directors and their respective chairmen, shall be responsible for the Internal Programs and betterment of the members of the organization. His duties include: - Internal Programming - Leadership Training - Chapter Sports - Public Relations - Speak-Up - Family Life - Orientations He shall also perform all other duties as directed by the President. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT VICE PRESIDENT: and obligations in his capacity The Community Development Vice President through his assigned Directors and their respective chairmen, shall be responsible for the external programs of the organization including but not limited to: 17 - community involvement - youth assistance - government involvement - international involvement - public relations - mental health and Camp Virginia Jaycees. He shall also perform all other duties and obligations in his capacity as directed by the President. STATE DIRECTOR: The State Director is a member of the State Board of Directors of the Virginia Jaycees, and is responsible for liason and coordination with the State organization including but not limited to: - Extensions - submission of Relevent Organization Concept Forms - Regional, State and National Awards - Regional, District, State and National Meetings and Conventions - bidding upon and hosting State meetings and State Programs or projects - Interchapter visitations - Candidates for State and National Jaycee Office - State and National. Events. He is directly responsible to the President and shall also perform alI other duties and fulfill all other obligations in his capacity as directed by the President. SECRETARY: The Secretary shall be directly responsible to the President and shall prepare and maintain accurate minutes of all meetings of the membership and the Board of Directors. He shall maintain and publish a calendar of events, maintain a current roster of membership and shall assist in the preparation of all chapter publications. He shall be responsible for all written notification of meetings. He shall maintain all official records of the organization. He shall also perform all other duties and fulfill all other obligations in his capacity as directed by the President. TREASURER: The Treasurer shall be directly responsible to the President and has the responsibility for the budget and for rendering a financial statement quarterly. He is an exrofficio member of the Ways and Means Committee and chairman of the Finance Committee. He shall be responsible for all of the financial activities of this organization. He shall request written budgets from all committees undertaking financial receipts or expenditures. He shall also perform all other duties and fulfill all other obligations in his capacity as directed by the President. 18 • 1 ....1- -° AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGCENTERHONDTUESDAY,ROFEBRUARY028TY19891NISTRATION RESOLUTION 22889-8.b OF APPRECIATION TO THE HONORABLE JACK B. COULTER UPON HIS RETIREMENT AS JUDGE OF THE 23RD JUDICIAL CIRCUIT WHEREAS, The Honorable Jack B. Coulter became judge of the 23rd Judicial Circuit in 1975, and has served the citizens of the Roanoke Valley with dignity and honor; and WHEREAS, Judge Coulter not only served the citizens through his career as a judge, but through membership in many civic organizations and his interest in youth activities; and WHEREAS, those activities included President of the Roanoke Jaycees, Vice Chairman and member of the Roanoke City School Board, member of the Board of Directors of the Roanoke Chamber of Commerce, member of the Board of Directors of the Roanoke Y.M.C.A., membership in numerous legal organizations, as well as teaching, lecturing and coaching youth sports activities; and WHEREAS, in recognitions of these endeavors, he was named Father of the Year for Youth Leadership, received the Jayceee' Distinguished service Award, and the Military Order of World Wars' Patriotic Award; and WHEREAS, Judge Coulter has distinguished himself throughout his legal career and sponsored many innovations in the courtroom designed to ease the responsibilities of jurors, attorneys, and those whose cases were being heard. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, wishes to express its deepest appreciation and the appreciation of its citizens to The Honorable Jack B. Coulter, Judge of the 23rd Judicial Circuit, for his many years of capable, loyal and dedicated service to Roanoke County; and FURTHER, the Board of Supervisors extends its best wishes for a happy, restful, and productive retirement. On motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by Supervisor Robers, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: ~. ~~~-e-e-sL Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Resolutions of Appreciation File 2 ITEM NUMBER~_ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: February 28, 1989 SUBJECT: Resolution of Appreciation to the Honorable Jack B. Coulter upon his retirement as Judge of the 23rd Judicial Circuit COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors approve the attached resolution. This resolution will be presented to Judge Coulter at a dinner on February 27, 1989. SUBMITTED BY: f/C ~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator -------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) M tion b No Yes Ak Denied ( > Received ( ) Referred To o y• Garrett Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers ITEM NO. ~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINITERHONDTUESDAY,ROEBRUARY028TY19$gINISTRATION CEN RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION TO THE HONORABLE JACK B. COULTER UPON HIS RETIREMENT AS JUDGE OF THE 23RD JUDICIAL CIRCUIT WHEREAS, The Honorable Jack B. Coulter became judge of the 23rd Judicial Circuit in 1975, and has served the citizens of the Roanoke Valley with dignity and honor; and WHEREAS, Judge Coulter not only served the citizens through his career as a judge, but through membership in many civic organizations and his interest in youth activities; and WHEREAS, those activities included President of the Roanoke Jaycees, Vice Chairman and member of the Roanoke City School Board, member of the Board of Directors of the Roanoke Chamber of Commerce, member of the Board of Directors of the Roanoke Y.M.C.A., membership in numerous legal organizations, as well as teaching, lecturing and coaching youth sports activities; and WHEREAS, in recognitions of these endeavors, he was named Father of the Year for Youth Leadership, received the Jayceee' Distinguished Service Award, and the Military Order of World Wars' Patriotic Award; and WHEREAS, Judge Coulter has distinguished himself throughout his legal career and sponsored many innovations in the courtroom designed to ease the responsibilities of jurors, attorneys, and those whose cases were being heard. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of - ~ ~' Roanoke County, Virginia, wishes to express its deepest appreciation and the appreciation of its citizens to The Honorable Jack B. Coulter, Judge of the 23rd Judicial Circuit, for his many years of capable, loyal and dedicated service to Roanoke County; and FURTHER, the Board of Supervisors extends its best wishes for a happy, restful, and productive retirement. ACTION # A-22889-8.c ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: February 28, 1989 SUBJECT: 40' Utility Easement being granted to Appalachian Power Company by the County of Roanoke COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Project 84-1-S, Starkey Sewage Pumping Station. The Project will require the granting of an easement crossing property owned by Roanoke County for the installation of an electrical service. FISCAL IMPACT: None. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors grant the Easement and authorize the County Administrator to execute a Deed in a form approved by the County Attorney conveying the easement. SUBMITTED BY: Phillip T. Henry, P. E Director of Engineering ACTION APPROVED: ~~N Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator Approved (x) Motion by: Harry C. Nickens/ Denied ( ) Richard W. Robers Garrett Received ( ) Johnson Referred McGraw Nickens To Robers cc: File Phillip Henry, Director, Engineering Cliff Craig, Director, Utilities Paul Mahoney, County Attorney VOTE No Yes Abs X x x x COMMUNITY SERVICES AND DEVELOPMENT 40' Utility Appalachian of Roanoke2 PowereCo.BByn~herCountyto ACTION # A-22889-8.d ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: February 28, 1989 SUBJECT: Acceptance of a 10-foot water line easement being dedicated to the County of Roanoke by Dominion Bank COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Project 89-1-W, Starkey Road - Fallowater Lane Water Line will improve the flow characteristics of the Avenham Water System. The project will require the acquisition of a water line easement crossing property owned by Dominion Bank located at the intersection of Fallowater Lane and Bernard Drive in the Cave Spring Magisterial District. FISCAL IMPACT: None. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors accept the easement and authorize the County Administrator to execute a deed in a form approved by the County Attorney conveying the easement. SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED: R ~~~ Phillip T. enry, P.E. Elmer C. Hodge Director of Engineeri g County Administrator a ~ ACTION VOTE Approved (x) Motion by: Harry C. Nickens/ No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Richard W. Ro ers Garrett x Received ( ) Johnson x Referred McGraw x To Nickens x Robers x cc: File Phillip Henry, Director, Engineering Cliff Craig, Director, Utilities Paul Mahoney, County Attorney 2 ..1-5 NORTH ~~ `0. ~0' '' ?. P ~~ ~~~ ~~ 3 ~~ 3 Q .~ Q .`L'`' ~ 2 / ~~ ~ I +~ I WATER LINE EASEMENT ~' R/~y FALLOWATER LANE N4~°2~'- - ~- ~ 1 ~~ 'WATER LINE EASEMENT N 1 M ~ 'R S 33°00'~~~W t III' 87.09-2-9 SCALE: I"=25' TAX MAP N0. Acceptance of a 10-foot water line easement COMMUNITY SERVICES being dedicated to the County of Roanoke by AND DEVELOPMENT Dominion Bank 3 J r t --F-- W AT THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 28, 1989 RESOLUTION 22889-8.e REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF HUNTRIDGE ROAD AND BRITANEY ROAD INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That this matter came this day to be heard upon the proceedings herein, and upon the application of Huntridge Road from its intersection with Springer Road to the cul-de-sac for a distance of 0.32 mile and Britaney road from its intersection with Springer Road to its intersection with Huntridge Road for a distance of 0.14 miles to be accepted and made a part of the Secondary System of State Highways under Section 33.1-229 of the Virginia State Code. 2. That it appears to the Board that drainage easements and a fifty (50) to (60) foot right-of-way for said roads have been dedicated by virtue of a certain map/maps known as Section No. 2 Huntridge Subdivision which map was recorded in Plat Book 10, Page 12, of the records of the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, on June 27, 1986 and that by reason of the recordation of said map no report from a Board of Viewers, nor consent or donation of right-of-way from the abutting property owners is necessary. The Board hereby guarantees said right-of-way for drainage. 3. That said roads known as Huntridge Road and Britaney Road and which are shown on a certain sketch accompanying this } Resolution, be, and the same are hereby established as public roads to become a part of the State Secondary System of Highways in Roanoke County, only from and after notification of official acceptance of said street or highway by the Virginia Department of Transportation. On motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by Supervisor Robers, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Phillip Henry, Director, Engineering Arnold Covey, Director, Developmen & Inspections, and copy for Virginia Department of Transportation 2 ITEM NUMBER ~.~"~ AT A REGULAR MHELDNATOTHEHROANOKE OCOUNTYEADMINISTRATIONNCENTER COUNTY, VIRGINIA MEETING DATE: February 28, 1989 SUBJECT: Acceptance of Huntridge Road and Briyanestemad into the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondar Sy COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Roanoke County Land Venture, Inc., the developer of rove oa No. 2 Huntridge, requests that the Board of Supervisors app resolution to the Virginia Department of Transportation requesting that they accept 0.32 miles of Huntridge Road from its intersection with Springer Drive to the cul-de-sac and 0.14 miles of Britaney Road .from its intersection with Springer Road to its intersection with Huntridge Road. The staff has representatives of the finds the roads to be FISCAL IMPACT: inspected these roads along with Virginia Department of Transportation and acceptable. No County funding is required. RECOMMENDATIONS: The staff recommends that the Board approve a resolution to the Virginia Department of Transportation requesting that they accept Huntridge Road and Britaney Road into the Secondary Road System. SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED: ~~ 6~ Phillip T. Henry, .E. Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator Director of Engineering Approved Denied Received Referred to ACTION Motion by: VOTE No Yes Abs Garrett Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers 2 '~`~ -~~y "'t '~_ NORTH PROPOSED ADDITION SHOWN IN GRAY DESCRIPTION: 1) Huntridge Road from its i ntersection with Springer Road to cul-de-sac. 2) Britaney Road from ~ its intersection with Springer , Road to its intersection with Huntri dge Road. LENGTH: (1)0.32 Miles (2)0.14 Miles RIGHT OF WAY: (1) 60 Feet (2) 50 (2) 30 Feet Feet ROADWAY WIDTH: (1) 36 SURFACE WIDTH: (1) 22 Feet Feet (2) 20 Feet SERVICE: (1) 22 Homes (2) 8 Homes IMPROVEMENT NECESSARY:. RECOMMENDATION: 3 ' ; ' , Y ;. Acceptance of Huntridge Road and Britaney Koad COMMUNITY SERVICES into the Virginia Department of Transportation AND DEVELOPMENT Secondary System 3 ./" ~~ AT THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 28, 1989 RESOLUTION REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF HUNTRIDGE ROAD AND BRITANEY ROAD INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That this matter came this day to be heard upon the proceedings herein, and upon the application of Huntridge Road from its intersection with Springer Road to the cul-de-sac for a distance of 0.32 mile and Britaney road from its intersection with Springer Road to its intersection with Huntridge Road for a distance of 0.14 miles to be accepted and made a part of the Secondary System of State Highways under Section 33.1-229 of the Virginia State Code. 2. That it appears to the Board that drainage easements and a fifty (50) to (60) foot right-of-way for said roads have been dedicated by virtue of a certain map/maps known as Section No. 2 Huntridge Subdivision which map was recorded in Plat Book 10, Page 12, of the records of the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, on June 27, 1986 and that by reason of the recordation of said map no report from a Board of Viewers, nor consent or donation of right-of-way from the abutting property owners is necessary. The Board hereby guarantees said right-of-way for drainage. 3. That said roads known as Huntridge Road and Britaney Road and which are shown on a certain sketch accompanying this 4 ,~. Z-L Resolution, be, and the same are hereby established as public roads to become a part of the State Secondary System of Highways in Roanoke County, only from and after notification of official acceptance of said street or highway by the Virginia Department of Transportation. 5 R i ryw.. AT THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGCENTERHONDTUESDAY,ROFEBRUARY028TY1989INISTRATION RESOLUTION 22889-8.f REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF KILDEER CIRCLE AND FALCON RIDGE ROAD INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ROAD SYSTEM BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That this matter came this day to be heard upon the proceedings herein, and upon the application of Kildeer Circle a section of road extending from Hunting Hills Drive (Route 1541) in a southerly direction to a cul de sac for a distance of 0.09 miles and Falcon Ridge Road extending from Hawkbill Circle (Rt. 1938) in a westerly direction to Hunting Hills Drive (Rt. 1541) for a distance of 0.40 miles. Pursuant to Section 33.1-72.1, Paragraph C-1 and funded pursuant to Section 33.1-75.1, Paragraph A of the Code of Virginia, of 1950 as amended. 2. That this Board does guarantee the Commonwealth of Virginia and unrestricted right-of-way of 50 feet with necessary easements for drainage as recorded in Plat Book 8, Page 5 and Plat Book 8, Page 48, dated December 15, 1971 and June 6, 1973, respectively, and deeds of later dates, all of record in the Roanoke County Circuit Court Clerk's Office. 3. That this Board does certify that these roads were open to public use prior to July 1, 1978, at which time it was open to and used by motor vehicles. 4. That this Board does certify that speculative interests are not involved. 5. That said roads known as Kildeer Circle and Falcon Ridge Road which are shown on a sketch accompanying this resolution be, and the same is hereby established as public roads to become a part of the state secondary system of highways in Roanoke County, only from and after notification of official acceptance of said street or highways by the Virginia Department of Transportation. On motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by Supervisor Robers, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: ~/ Q~-e ~ Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Phillip Henry, Director, Engineering Arnold Covey, Director, Development & Inspections and copy for Virginia Department of Transportation 2 ITEM NUMBER '~" AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: February 28, 1989 SUBJECT: Acceptance of Kildeer Circle and Falcon Ridge Road into the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Staff requests that the Board of Supervisors approve a resolution to the Virginia Department of Transportation requesting that they accept 0.09 miles of Kildeer Circle and 0.40 miles of Falcon Ridge Road. The staff has inspected these roads along with representatives of the Virginia Department of Transportation and finds the roads meet the provision of Section 33.1-72.1 of the Code of Virginia. Additional drainage easements required will be donated by the property owners. FISCAL IMPACT: Improvements will be funded pursuant to Section 33.1-75.1 Paragraph A of the Code of Virginia. RECOMMENDATIONS: The staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors accept the donation of required drainage easement and approve a resolution to the Virginia Department of Transportation requesting that they accept Kildeer Circle and Falcon Ridge Road into the Secondary Road System. z-7 SUBMITTED BY: r~~~~ ~~~ Phillip T."Henry, P. . Director of Engineering APPROVED: ~~ µ/ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ----------------- -------------------- ACTION VOTE Nn Yes Abs Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by: 2 Garrett Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers -7 NORTH PROPOSED ADDITION SHOWN IN GRAY DESCRIPTION: ' 1) Falcon Ridge Road from Hunting Hills Drive to Hawbill Circle 2) Kildeer Circle from Hunting Hills Dri~~ to cul-de-' sac . LENGTH: (1) 0.04 Feet (2) 0.09 Feet RIGHT OF WAY: tl) 50 Feet (2) 50 Feet ROADWAY WIDTH: (1) 30 Feet (2) 30 Feet SURFACE WIDTH: (1) 22 Feet (2) 20 Feet SERVICE: (1) 20 Homes (2) 5 Homes IMPROVEMENT NECESSARY: RECOMMENDATION: -~_-,•- _ _ NN 6 - r - ~ 1 I 0 t~ ~+.. ~ ~ '~O 2 / .i1y 3~ s Q ! d / ,~ a 3t 'snr :+ ! sip : ~» w / ~ ,M ~• ~~ ~ , / J/~ \ w( ~ ~ yy J s O a 7 \ Yl / ;.~ . ~. } w s \ / ~. 1 •~ 'b x~ M~. ~l O I L / ~ . s ~/: ~z v ~ -~~ Jm i ~ _ t ~° ., 29 z \ ~ ~ \\ °uN ~# J • f ~! 3 ~ ., ~ ~ ~ S 4 . u/s 2 _ ~ C ,..! ~~ gq - _ MOf K//6 ' ~. ~ Yq n ~ ~~ ~~4~,~.. Q • ~ J~ ACCEPTANCE OF KILDEER CIRCLE AND FALCON COMMUNITY SERVICES RIDGE ROAD INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY SYSTEM AND DEVELOPMENT 3 ..:.,~- ~.w: AT THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, RESOLUTION REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF KILDEER CIRCLE AND FALCON RIDGE ROAD INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ROAD SYSTEM BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That this matter came this day to be heard upon the proceedings herein, and upon the application of Kildeer Circle a section of road extending from Hunting Hills Drive (Route 1541) in a southerly direction to a cul de sac for a distance of 0.09 miles and Falcon Ridge Road extending from Hawkbill Circle (Rt. 1938) in a westerly direction to Hunting Hills Drive (Rt. 1541) for a distance of 0.40 miles. Pursuant to Section 33.1-72.1, Paragraph C-1 and funded pursuant to Section 33.1-75.1, Paragraph A of the Code of Virginia, of 1950 as amended. 2. That this Board does guarantee the Commonwealth of Virginia and unrestricted right-of-way of 50 feet with necessary easements for drainage as recorded in Plat Book 8, Page 5 and Plat Book 8, Page 48, dated December 15, 1971 and June 6, 1973, respectively, and deeds of later dates, all of record in the Roanoke County Circuit Court Clerk's Office. 3. That this Board does certify that these roads were open to public use prior to July 1, 1978, at which time it was open to and used by motor vehicles. 4 ~~ 4. That this Board does certify that speculative interests are not involved. 5. That said roads known as Kildeer Circle and Falcon Ridge Road which are shown on a sketch accompanying this resolution be, and the same is hereby established as public roads to become a part of the state secondary system of highways in Roanoke County, only from and after notification of official acceptance of said street or highways by the Virginia Department of Transportation. 5 ACTION # A-22889-8.g ITEM NUMBER ~' AT A REGULARAMHELDNATOTHEHROANOKE COUNTYEADMINISTRATIONNCENTER COUNTY, VIRGINI MEETING DATE: February 28, 1989 SUBJECT: Acceptance of water and sewer facilities serving Section No. 2 Huntridge COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Developers of Section No. 2 Huntridge, Roanoke County Land Venture, Inc., have requested that Roanoke County accept the Deed conveying the water and sewer lines serving the subdivision along with all necessary easements. The water and sewer lines are installed, as shown on plans prepared by T. P. Parker & Son, Engineers & Surveyors entitled Section No. 2 Huntridge, dated February 28, 1984, which are on file in the Engineering Department. The water and sewn vedlby construction meets the specifications and the plans app the County. FISCAL IMPACT: The values of the water and sewer construction are $46,420 and $110,450 respectively. RECOMMENDATION: The staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors accept the water and sewer facilities serving the subdivision along with all necessary easements, and authorize the County Administrator to execute a Deed for the transfer of these facilities. za SUBMITTED BY: Phillip T. He ry,.P. E. Director of Engineering APPROVED: ~j (/ Y ~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator -------------------- --------------------- OTE ACTION Approved (X) Motion by: Harry C. Nickens/ Denied ( ) Richard W. Ro ers Garrett Received ( ) Johnson Referred McGraw Nickens To Robers cc: File Phillip Henry, Director, Engineering Cliff Craig, Director, Utilities Paul Mahoney, County Attorney V No Yes Abs X x x x ~~ NORTH i~s .~ ,' € . ~ J ~ ~y : ; ' 1 1 :.r-. ,< • ~ ., .. ~ w t ~ J = ~ is '~4 ~`~~ u ` h. p ~ as • . s a ~~ ~ ~p •€ P ~ A ~ i ....~ ~ ~!S 'a .b[_, vn w. ~ .' P tel. !' ~ ,.U i p .~ 1 ~ ~' Vtr o, ``._~!ryo~' .. `r"~ ~.b ~~. k- I.r i ~ ~ i .... ' ~ +, r ~ 4~ I i L ., f~* M ------ ---- -- -~----- ----~ i I$~ \~ ~. ~~ _ . ~... C..i~..~.r ~•~r ~I... ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ._ a~ ~~ X60 ._ ~________.-__~_. ~ -~T.T~--~~'__.. ~~ -_ Acceptance of water and sewer facilities serving ~ COMMUNITY SERVICES Section No. 2 Huntridge AND DEVELOPMENT 3 ACTION # ~''-22889-8.h ITEM # ~' AT A REGULAR MEETDNGATOTHEHROANOKE OCOUNTYEADMINISTRATIONNCENTER COUNTY, VIRGINIA HEL MEETING DATE: February 28, 1989 AGENDA ITEM: Addition t S steminia Department of Transportation Secondary y COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Roanoke County has rertateonnthatlthelfollow nghroadsghave been Department of Transpo accepted into the Secondary System effective February 16, 198 a. 0.11 miles of Fox Ridge Road Crest Circle i 0.40 b miles of ne Peregr . c 0.25 miles of Fox Ridge Road . d. 0.15 miles of Silver Fox Road SUBMITTED BY: Mary H. Allen Deputy Clerk APPROVED BY: ~~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator --------- VOTE ACTION YeS Ab A roved (x) Motion by: Harry C. Nickens/Richard No x - Denied ( ) W• Robers Garrett - Johnson x Received ( ) McGraw x - Referred Nickens x - To Robers x - cc: File Phillip Henry, Director, Engineering ~ 0~8 ~,~ V +' ~~ i ~ ~ l ~ ~ VVV DEPARTMENT OFTRANSPORTATION 1401 EAST BROAD STREET OSCAR K. MABRY ~ RICHMOND, 23219 DEPUTY COMMISSIONER RAY D. PETHTEL COMMISSIONER February 16 , 1989 Secondary System Additions Roanoke County Board of Supervisors County of Roanoke p, O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 MEMBERS OF THE BOARD: As requested in your re feRoanoke~ N ~n County are o System econda following additions to the S Y 1989. 16 , hereby approved, effective February LENGTH ADDITIONS HUNTING HILLS - SECTION 20 Route 1420 (Fox Ridge Road) - From Route 1541 to 0,11 Mi. Route 1421-North. Route 1421 (Peregrine Crest Circle) - From Route 0.40 Mi. 1420-North to Route 1421-South. Route 1420 (Fox Ridge Roadj - From Route 14"ll-South 0.25 Mi. to Route 1422. Route 1422 (Silver Fox Road) - From Route 1420 to 0,15 Mi. West cul-de-sac. Sincerely, ~~ Oscar K. Mabry Deputy Commissioner TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21ST CENTURY ACTION # A-22889-8.i ITEM NUMBER AT A RIRGINIA HELD ATOTHEHROANORE COUNTYEADMINISTRATION~CENTER COUNTY, V MEETING DATE: February 28, 1989 AGENDA ITEM: Acceptance of sewer facilities serving White Subdivision COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The developers of White Subdivision, Section 1, Dominion Builders, have ewerelinestserving theesubd visionca longtwith all conveying the s necessary easements. The sewer lines are installed as shown on as-built plans prepared by Buford T. Lumsden & Associates entitled Sanitary Sewer Extension, plan number 88-328, dated January 25, 1989. The sewer line construction meets the specifications and the plans approved by the County. FISCAL IMPACT: The value of the sewer construction is $4,200.00. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors accept the sewer facilities serving the subdivision along with all necessary easements, and authorize the County Administrator to execute a Deed for the transfer of these facilities. SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED ` ~~Y Cliffor aig, Elmer C. Hodge Utility Director County Administrator 1 ,Ak: Yi.H' I' ACTION VOTE Approved (X) Motion by: Harry C. Nickens/ No Yes Abs Richard W.Ro ers Garrett x Denied ( ) Johnson x Received ( ) McGraw x Referred Nickens x to Robers x cc: File Cliff Craig, Director, Utilities Phillip Henry, Director, Engineering Paul Mahoney, County Attorney 2 J ~! ~~Y~~ ~p!!NT „'V CLUB 11 w F 4. ~~ , ~ LOM ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ r• ~7~~7 7~M ~ N (~~Jb ,~~n !ice Q / + ~2 ~u° q ss.» N % 0 7 12 E ~ , s .fc S~ f is ID ~ • IS ~ 9 M ~ ~i • 5'~ i~ ~-t ~ -Q NORTH ~` MC l~ ~» !~ '' / ~ a J• 'y V 2)~ ~~ ~~ 1 4 ~/ \ '~ ~S4t 16 ` ~~ L i'i• 14 1~5 n ~~ •y / i f ~~~+ ~ •'.' / 1 1 ~1 ~/ G1u0 N ~O,~~ O ;r •+~7 c s. ~y,~ a• ~: ~ SAS! J7iy 175 >a »N ` ` / (Cr.+~~ ~.~~ ~_ ~- ~- -~ ~\ J/ ~ z // ~`` \ \ 9.S ~ // ~~~ ~ ~~ ~~ . l L / r. ACCEPTANCE OF SEWER COMMUNITY SERVICES SERVING WHITE SUBDIVISION AND DEVELOPMENT N,nl~-, ~Y~~~t ACTION # A-22889-8.j ITEM NUMBER ,~°`"' 0 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: February 28, 1989 AGENDA ITEM: Acceptance of a sanitary sewer easement being donated by Velma G. Edwards COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Velma G. Edwards is donating an easement to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County for the location and construction of a fifteen (15) foot wide off-site sanitary sewer line for the Duxbury Court subdivision. This easement is located across Lot 4, Block 1, Section 1, Beverly Heights North in the Catawba Magisterial District of Roanoke County. Pursuant to Ordinance No. 1027874 adopted on October 27, 1987, the Board authorized the County Administrator to accept donations or dedications of non-controversial real estate matters. FISCAL IMPACTS: None. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Board favorably consider this acceptance under the consent agenda. Respectfully submitted, Sarah A. Rice Assistant County Attorney ~~ ---------- ----------------- VOTE -------------------- ACTION Motion by: Ha~1" r N;ckens/ p,ppr. owed ~ ) Denied ( ) Richard W. Robers Received ( ) Referred To cc: File Utilities Cliff Craig, Director, Phillip Henry, Director, Engineering Paul Mahoney, County Attorney No Yes Abs Garrett x Johnson x McGraw _x- Nickens x Robers x -- .. , , ROpROPEt~>'rEti, ING. P I I I ~I ~ I,A N4MAfZK. 770D' 6 N79°01'30"E ~" ,~ 15.00' `~ - 9 ~ ' l e~ ~ NEW tiANiTARY z ' . ' - ~ bEWEW om l;A5EM6Ni " ; , ~,~, ,o ~ m N ~ ,f ~. ,.. I~ , T j ~ 1 - , ~ - I.: ~ ~ 6 r' 5 U' ^i 5 ~ 5,OOL~1 N h79°01'80"E o l0 m tt V' ' n I~ m : ~~; ,;, o == ExrSrING z vn~ECarrvy ° - ~ ~ ~g _" ~mM ,r 8UI67+N~i bINE N '° _. ;~ fr gx15r. 8= o, ErlS -~' r, 10' x Ig' GAY N79°01'30"E.5.00'~r ~~~ ~ ~'J ~ ~ ~ r I z 4 , I aNri ca ~nsr!n+~N N .. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ 00' - 15 ~~ ? . .A. ~-579°~g9~0~ c~a+~~ 'A.. GEEiGVY00~1 ~ Oa-V~ a = o'~~ oo ' ~5o'RIW) ^ •r~ a = o~; :o' n -. _ '~ ~ I r ^g° 31'00"~' 1~ ~ PLAT Sl10WING NEW SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT BEING GRANTED TO ROANOKE COUNTY 80ARD OF SUPERVISORS BY ' VELMA G. EDWARDS SITUATED IN LOT 4, BLOCK 1, SECTION 1FAGE 55)..- OEVERLY fIEIGFITS NORTFI (p'B•VIRGINIA ROANOKE COUNTY, SCALE: 1" = 30' o~TE: 12 JANUARY 1989 BUFORD T. EN NI EDRSN SURYESO STATES, P. C. ROANOKE, YIROINIA COM~~ °'194V ....... .y4 t a K I u ~~ K- I COUNTY OF ROP,NOKE, VIRGINIA CAPITAL FUND - UNAPPROPRIATED BAI-~ANCF 12,644 Beginning Balance at July 1, 1988 $ 50,000 Additional Amount from 1988-89 Budget rovetnents at Administrative Center (6,450) November 22, 1988 Imp 56 194 Balance as of February 28, 1989 Submitted by ~~~~ ~ ~~~ Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance COUNI.'Y OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA UNAPPROPRIATED BALANCE - GENERAL FUND Balance at July 1, 1988 $3,037,141 August 9, 1988 Dixie Caverns Landfill Cleanup (400,000) September 13, 1988 Transfer to Board Contingency (50,000) September 26, 1988 Design Phase of Spring Hollow (175,000) Reservoir October 2 5, 1988 Funding for Public Information (46,500) Officer November 9, 1988 Dixie Caverns Landfill Cleanup (260,000) 783) (34 November 22, 1988 Lease Additional Office Space , $2,0 Balance as of February 28, 1989 The recommended levelcent of aheatotal Genera88F~andlbudgetnlmum of $1,748,124, which is 3 per Submitted by Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance 1 ''** COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA RESERVE FOR BOARD CONI'ING'Q~ICY Original Budget at July 1, 1988 $50,000 June 28 1988 Funding of Length of Service Benefit and ' for Volunteer Fire, Rescue, Auxiliary Sheriff's Deputies (9,000) (39,405) July 26, 1988 Tweed's Access Road September 13, 1988 Add to Board Contingency from 50,000 Unappropriated Balance September 26, 1988 Beautification of Brambleton Avenue (3,500) September 28, 1988 Economic Development Trip to Northern roved Administratively) (A i i (1,000) pp a n Virg October 6, 1988 Typewriter for Clerk of Courts (Approved Administratively) (966) October 6, 1988 Economic Development Promotion inistratively) d (1,025) m (Approved A October 11, 1988 Safekeeping of Securities (2,000) October 20, 1988 Informational Brochure for November roved Administratively) (A i (6,500) pp on Elect 1988 October 25 Additional Allocation to Total Action (10,000) , Against Poverty (TAP) November 3, 1988 Survey Fees - Safety Cenrovedand Lab Site (App i cs Forens (2,473) Administratively) (1,000) November 9, 1988 Bushdale Road (365) December 13, 1988 C. L. & O. Investors December 20, 1988 Stonebridge Park Parking Lot (Approved Administratively) (5,000) 1989 10 uar J Salaries for Board of Zoning Appeals (625) , y an 000) (1 January 24, 1989 Contribution to Arts Festival , 1989 24 uar J Sesquicentennial History Books (300) , y an 15 841 Balance as of February 28, 1989 Submitted by ~,~,alrt,2~ i(.> t ~~~ ane D. H at Di Y Director of Finance ITEM NUMBER "` AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THROANOKE oOUNTYEADMINISTRATRONNOENTER COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE VA., ON TUESDAY, IN ROANOKE, MEETING DATE: February 28, 1989 SUBJECT: Accounts Paid - January 1989 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: $1,996,102.78 Payments to Vendors: payroll: 01/06/89 $371,703.86 749,451.31 01/20/89 377,747'45 $2,745.554.09 A detailed listing of the payments is on file with the Clerk to the Board of Supervisors. APPROVED: SUBMITTED BY: n..~ ~ ~=' Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance ~/ v Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator _ ____ VOTE -- ACTION No Ye8 Abs Approved ( ) Motion by: Denied t ~ Received ( ) Referred To Garrett Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers 1 I I I ~±~ I l ~~z eft ~ i p6 / W ~ Pd9 i-. O J 0 i~H ~ !l1 V ~ ` I C7 1 W .I 1~ .ti l \T `~ _ ._ ./' .. I I I t I I 1 I II II ~jl I ~~I I, 'I I 11 1 i ~I~ I~~ I~ I I, '' I ~ II O I I I h ~O Vl O h O I m ~ I I I 1 f'~ O l I I I ~ N N ~~~ h~~~~ N m M H O [~ ~ m~ O T I 06 ~ g ~ 1 ;/ P I H m N I I II I i t+l ~ W o ~ M m .D .~+ N / 1 V O~ Vl O <J O+ v h tO'f N t~ V' / v H ~ m I I i I M ~ I I a•~ h ~ ~~ ~ m II I 11 ~ I I I I ~ 6 ~ Ld y H .-a { I > O I ~ ~ [~ .p H .p O .O ~ O II ~ N O ~ T 0 ~ ~ m VN' [~ H T N tHfl ~ C h P 'I I ~ .~ ~ N IN/1 ~ 1 I II O m ~ I II ~ ~ 11 I I ~,. I i I I ~ ~ j q ~ V S T O M. ~ ~ I ~ N N .O N ~ h W V N M~ M P I I 1i ; I 1. I , O f n I 'f f f -I m .--1 I N N I N 00 m [~ T N~~ M M~ N ~ [~ m N Q~ e pO... 1 .-] 'T- ~ .O I N fD N .C 1~ ~ M ~ ~ ~ ~M II .p ~~ I I~ I I ~ i I I .D N d I ~ Y + C~ ' C ~ ' I ~ I I ' f 1 2 (L h N ..~ '+ f ti j C I C O O I i O. i M I I 1 I I '. I "~ ~~ O JOl m M V' N Q< M /Ol 1/Ol ~ m ~ ~ I 11 II ~ I I O. < v"1 C ~1' H .n "' '' I ~ ~ h ~ N I N I N 0 O 1 I 0 i / 1 ii I ~ I I 11 .Oll m n 0~ O. C O. .O V' N N ~ n Vml m O ~ I ~ ~ m Jf .O O . 1 N h-1 a N N ..i O .O C/+ : P [!1 ~ P 0 m M O~ m~ W O O I X + . f j N N J m~ ['~ ~ G h M 9 h N ~~ P~ m .p ~ m I Q ~ 11 N 11 i H '+ t'~ O ~ yOj fN O. f m ,..~ N ~' .-. .--I ~ H N ~ ~ I a! II I I I I V .Z i ~ O m N O ', ~~ H O .~ n T ~ O~~ C O m O N a I T O ~ ~ 1 ` 1 M~ i i ~ M ~ 0 O ' O ' O O O O O P O N~ ~ f O V O N Ul /t O C'1 P M N ~ II N O O O V 1 V ~ ti m N eh I ~ O ~ h h I . O ~ .-a ~ 'f i . ~ f -. ~ r V ~ p uhl P O /Oi m .~-. ~ .-. H .~+ YP' N N ~ N ~ N .O 11 ~I I ~. i h' N < V~' VN' < lam') N O fP'f .O e ' ll O M II I i V ~ .O l .-+ C 0 < N ~ M ~ ~ VPi h .O ~ ~1 I ~ 11 ~ I N ~ ~ II I I HMO ho ~o.I .-' m m m ~ M 0 I I I I II °° ~ I '~ I ~ I ~, ~i I U A 11 1 v. i. O ' ~ ~ ~ m n m ^ ~ ~ f] O. .~+ ~ O. n O m N V' V ~ H 11 ~ I ~ h H ~ ~~ W rl O 6 m Z i N sP h P~ h M P .~i P~ O -~ O O N .O P O. ti N ~ ` ~ N I~ i li I 1 i .-I 1 I N v N- N~~ M~ 1 N I 0 1 m I ~ o I 1 I II 11 1 I I I m . C O ~ N 0 .p OI N O f~i m m O< ~ N~~ . 1 O N O~ .O N p H O I/1 l"~ O< [~ m .O H O O ~ ~ p ! ~ I ~ ~I f~ 11 i I I O N ~ G `~ .h-1 M t ~ oy N ~ .O ~ n ~ .h-~1 sO+~ M ~ ~ ~ h .P+ N M f'I ~ H II ~ 1/'1 I •7 O I t ~~ .r li ~ II I I I I I rn m ~ m ; 6 II I I ' .y a~f N -.+ N m ~~";~° ~ ! ~ rIM;II ~ ~ I ~ i I ~ P ~ m N ~ 00 !~ fM~f 0 !1 N O O N' II N h' N N ,~ ~ ~ II O 11 I 1 -I ~ f N ` f m 0 r-1 N m~~ 0 O~ ~ O h h . I h O 0 0 ~ t I ~~ I r1 I I I ~ I I I ; ~ T H i +, vO'f ^~ vl .O N ~ HD N N m n N N ~ .~i .~ H m f'7 I ~"" I .p T ~ fM~l, ~ ~ I I I y: .+ I; ~ I I I , I H . J ~ p f'f 1 ~ O VOl H O fJ N I 1 ' I I ~, 1 1 0 d O~ .-I N , ; m I N ..~ a' N ' 1 I 1 W , I A I I V i 1 ~ I I ~ I ' ~ ~ W W 1 ~ I I 1 1 I 1 l ' ~ f 1/~ I ~1 i N I ~ O I , i I I O I I ~ I I I I I W I W F+ 1 I ~I i r+ .-~ yr;3 ~ i - ~ < ~ ~ y ~ O 1 p d W y ~ m l ~ 6 I ~ _ ~ y I ~' Q ~ 9 0 6 p , W ~ Z I H II , 1 4 . 1 j w~ m N i t l ~~ N o w I ~ ~ I I 6 "' y+ ~I ~.i u~ ~y{/~ m o ~ ~ ~ c`3 ~ O I O X 4i ~ W~ J c N W d ~ V I V d~^^ w i i W` I i I~ tO.) I 4 ~ {.] W d F+Ny`! ~ ,.. 4' 41 W Yt yH~ {VTJ t+I Oy ~ ~ ~ ~S ~ I N ~ W ~ W O ~I ~ WO ri, O a , ~ yl ~ I ~ I V I ` ~ -) ~? J W 01 f W Z F ~ J ~ c ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ V N I paaaaa~ Vy~ c'~ z` ~~v'.., d''i ~"~j ~i m s sppp I 4~tild ~y2 i . t+ ct„' c~vdO I, a dyy o 4©~ae+ ~ ~ ` zo~ I cv c~~ { ~ ~ I " I I` yy p~ ~ H> .~ ff~ ~"I ~ I I W W ~ W~ V d~ ~ D b H~ N ' I_ _ I I~ ~ i I rv ~ I~ __ n C W !+N NCOiO O , I I N i { Ira ~ ._ ~ ~ ~ ' ( I I I `~~~ I~ ' _ I: '. -'; i - _ _ ~ ~ _ . _.. _ _~..m. . .,_. ~ ~__ - ----- --------COUNTY OF ROANOK - - - - STATEMENT OF EXPENDITURES SEVEN MONT!iS ENDED JANUARY 31, 1989 -- - - ---- _ --_ _ ---- ------------_ _-__ - _ _..- X BUDGET EXPENDED --GENERAL-ADMINISTRATION-- ----- -- ____--- 8 ----...._ ___---_.- - 179,742 3 ----- 109,022 61 BOARD OF SUPERVI50BS 186,961 74,805 40 _ - _-- COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR __. _. __ __ _-- -.--- - - _ 206,067 __. _118,659 - - _. 58 --~-~- ---- -PERSONNEL ~---_ -- - 173,554 108,602 63 COUNTY ATTORNEY 629 499 265,179 53 COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE , 461,441 233,127 -51 - - - TREASURER 168,374 104,037 62 ELECTIONS 86,116 58,806 68 SESQUICENTENNIAL - FISCAL MANAGEMENT SUPERINTENDENT OF FISCAL MANAGEMENT 5 ~ --- 32,700 859 _ -- ---- -295 56 - - --49 ---- - "~-_--- --"- _ .__609,855 , - COUNTY ASSESSOR - - --- 357,939 186,088 52 CENTRAL ACCOUNTING 212,881 118,842 56 _ - -- . __ PROCUREMENT _ - " 97,052 __50,362 ._ ---- -- 52 MANAGEMENT & BUDGET - "--- 1,136,037 972,989 86 RISK MANAGEMENT -JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION - 149,366 13,228 9 CIRCUIT COURT 18,740 5,055 27 .--- ---- _ --- - -.. _._- . _. GENERAL DISTRICT COURT . ~ - ._ _ _ 730 ._... __...__.__..277 38 "-- ----MAGISTRATES - ~ 8,621 3,521 41 J & D DISTRICT COURT 618 495 273,313 55 ___ _~.--- -,~, CLERK OF CIRCUIT COURT -- ----- , _ --._ - 288; 589 - 160; 994-------- ----36 - :. - ----COMMONWEALTH`S-ATTORNEY- ~ 39,175 8,844 23 - PROBATION OFFICE 3,330 1,679 50 __._.____._ _ __ _ -- VICTIM WITNESS .~. PUBLIC SAFETY 975,610 3 2,149,482 54 --~-'--`-- ~ POLICING & INVESTIGATING _; - -- , - -- --- 960 -- T _ li0 --- -- - --Il- --- HIGHWAY SAFETY COMMISSION ~""~- 2,228,639 1,199,134 54 FIRE 478,671 252,818 53 _. RESCUE SQUAD - ---~ EMERGENCY SERVICES & flAZ MAT RESPONSE 47,192 6 20,747 402 151 1 44 61 CONFINE*iENT/CARE OF PRISONERS 1,880,96 638 145 , , 81,931 56 ANIMAL CONTROL , ... _ -- - - - PUBLIC FACILITIES ~ SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC FACILITIES 104,309 56,677 153 - - 64 54 _ 51 _ 125,798 , .. STREET LIGHTS - 536,714 346,946 65 ENGINEERING 312 190 104,879 55 __ _ - - - - ~ GENERAL SERVICES , - ___.._ _-____. p - -------- -586 -- _ ___ _ _ __. _-._ _ . 0 - - _ -. DRAINAGE - ------ -- ---- ----.-_- _-_ _ __- 790,582 385,982 49 BUILDINGS & GROUNDS 294 953 496,932 52 _ ~ PARKS ~ RECREATION , 1,658,312 1,013,686 61 REFUSE - 000 60 32,075 53 PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION , 857 679 447,773 52 _ ___ ~ GROUNDS MAINTENANCE , -- :FINANCIAL STATEMENTS: PAGE 2 OF 3 _ COUNTY -- OF nOANOKE - - _._ . _ STATE'lENT OF EXPENDITURES SEVEN MONTHS ENDED JANUARY 31 , 1989 _ - ' EALTH & 50CIAL SERVICES 397,370 191,379 48 -- - -- ---- ---_ __.._._ -.-_ _ - PUBLIC HEALTH SOCIAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION -- -- ~ _ _ -1,791,157 - - 1,069,110 -~ 111 421 60 _ - -- - 52 802,285 , PUBLIC ASSISTANCE 36,000 12,698 35 _ INSTITUTIONAL CARE _ 984 104 47,492 45 SOCIAL SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS , DEVELOPMENT 0 0 0 SUPERIyTENDE9T OF DEVELOPMENT 307,054 152,252 50 PLANNING & Z09ING 226,208 150,097 66 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 113,438 65,232 58 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 17,933 9,664 54 PLANNING COMMISSION 195 206 116,512 57 - - _ _-_ . --- ---_-- - ___-- CONSTRUCTiON BUILDING SERVICES , ____ __-_ .. . _ -_. _-- -.--- -_- - --____ _ __------.-.--- NON-DEPARTMENTAL ~ 53,896 54 ASST., CO. ADM. HUMAN SERVICES 612 145 1 620,473 54 LIBRARY EXTENSION & CONTINllING EDUCATION , , 96,326 31,003 063 121 32 16 _.. - EMPLOYEE BENEFITS O SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS 741,392 _ ...20,000 , 18,252 _ _ _ _ - 91 ~" CONTRIBUTIONS T 796,343 64,423 8 MISCELLANEOUS ---- ------ -------- _ 26,374,270 14,145,863 54 _ - TOTAL ------------ --- - ------- - -TRANSFERS _AND -RESERVES -~~-`"---- - - _`~- ~ - (416) 0 REIMBURSABLE EXPENDITURES 806,542 4 2,530,398 53 -- - - -- --- -- - ~ ~- TRANSFER TO DEBT SERVICE _ . "- , _._ _ . _ 334 876 -- _....157, 868' -__ _ . - -- 47 TRANSFER TO INTERNAL SERVICE , 000 666 26 9,026,895 34 ,, TRANSFER TO SCHOOL OPERATING FUND , , 000 215 102,083 47 _ ----- ------- - -----'--- TRANSFER TO UTILITY CAPITAL ---- -~ , --~--I;643;714- " -955;043 -- --56--- ------TRANSFER T0-CAPITAL PROJECTS 75,768 37,884 50 TRANSGER TO YOUTH HAVEN- 846 448 0 0 _ ~: _. ---_-._--__-.______.__..- _. _.._ -- - UNAPPROPRIATED BALANCE " , - 18;T32 -- -- ----6-- - =-- 0 cHCY RESERVE FOR BCARD CONTING __ _ ________ TOTAL TRANSFER ITEMS 34, 208, 878 12, 809, 755 289 ------------ ___________ _. __--------- - S 60,583,148 3 26,955,618 44 _ . _ __ __ .- _-- - --- --- -- --._ ._ ___ .__.____ _____---- - GRAND TOTAL --- .-------------- --- ~ _ _._ - Financial Statements: Page 3 0 3 ACTION # ITEM NUMBER ~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER February 28, 1989 MEETING DATE: 1„1; Work Session with the Parks & Recreation Citizens' AGENDA ITE Advisory Commission COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND: he Parks & Recreation Advisory ud ri slthehoperationskand T ast ten months st Y g est cost diligently for the p t to sugg activities of the Department in an attemp iciencies and improvements in service levels to th whi h were eff As a result of park improvements, of Roanoke County. the Parks Division will ark land/grounds financed with the 1985 bond referen um, be responsible for an addition~ai ho t anradditional lincluded in during the 1989-90 fiscal year, the targeted budget allocation or in manpower being the original budget estimates. of resented itself as an opportunity This challenge has p the manpower, equipment working "smarter" and better utilirovide responsible levels of and icecto ltheecit zensnofl our community. sere The members of the Parks & Recreation Advisory Cornmission m. to discuss the attached report and will be present at 4:00 p. present their recommendations. ALTERNATIVES AND IMPACT: FISCAL IMPACT: STAFF RECOMMENDATION: g estions Staff recommends that you consider the various su g recommendations offered by the Parks & Recreation Commission and individual reports back to the Board of and allow staff to bring near future for implementing Supervisors foovedtbyn the Board of Supervisors. the items app Respectfully Submitted: - John M. ChamblY s, Jr• Assistant Administrator Approved BY: /` Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ~~ -- ------------------- VOTE ---------------- ACTION No Yes Abs Approved ( ) Motion by: Denied ( ~ Received ( ) Referred To Garrett Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers cc: Steve Carpenter parks & Recreation Commission TION ~' 1 The 1985 Bond Referendum included monies for the development of six additional parks in Roanke County. Beginning in fiscal year 1989-90, the Department of Parks & Recreation will be responsible for maintaining approximately 369.25 new acres of re resentin approximately 89~ increase in work load. facilities, P g the operating budgets and man During this same course of time, nize the additional power levels have not been increased to recog responsibility. The Commission and the Department of Parks & Recrealanninave met this situation as a challenge and through advarcoedam whichg have developed a interritysand qualityfoflexisting services, will protect the g improve maintenance opera~iationalevelsaandntaxmbaseaof thet e current department approp County. Just as new fire stations need personnel and equipment to operate after the facilities have been completed, new parks also must have sufficient resources for maintenance and to protect the public investment. A, public Assessment Survey The Department of Parks & RecreaofiVirgania~skDivisioncofsely with representatives from the State uestionnaire Parks & Recreationanddscientifacallyothe leisureeservice needs, to present fairly attitudes and interests of the residents WasRdevelopeduand•has During the summer of 1988, such a survey been validated to represent a 95$ confidence leAecopy ofethe attitudes of the resideaSSwellRasnthe blankysurvey form, have results of the survey. acka e for Your consideration and review. been attached to this p g B, 1985 Bond Issue Projects (Summary) 1. Green Hill Park: scheduled for public use - Spring, 1990. Access road/parking lots completed, four (4) baseball fieldsli°apfectedwareasxseedednfor scheduled requirements, a maturation in Spring, 1990; 2. Starkey Park: scheduled for public use - Fall, 1989. Fenced baseeted.f1Pic nicd areaslandositetamenitieser field compl completed; EXECUTIVE SUMMARY en for public use. Land 3. Whis Bring Pines Park: upchased playground equipment acquisition comple~ed, p1989. to '4e installed Sp g- xa~~y Hollow Gardens: scheduled for public use May 11, 4. arkin areas nearing 1989 (dedication). Access road/p g completion. Through community VOicniceareasoand antrail parks Division, access bridges, p 11 1989; system (initial) will be completed by May , 5, yinyard Park: scheduled for public use (new construction) mid summer, 1990. Plans and specifications have been approved by Army Corps of Engineers, FEMA and the City of Roanoke. Currently out for bid for the construction of three (reementsrwithlds and associated parking. Access road ag pirginia Department of Transportation and City of Roanoke have been executadCessDOunding)vbyaearly summer, completed (recreational 1990; 6, Walrond Park: open for public use. Land acquisition program completed. C. Cost Efficiency Strategy The Parks & Recreation Advisory Commission aarevenuedpolicy the Department oa thekuse ofc thetnew mona esewhpch could be and has suggeste enerated. It has been estimated nshancludee hiringv twoeS coul g and suggestio ital be $70,000 annually additional maintenanmaintenanceandThegeirecommendations have been equipment for parks included in the budget process which has been submitted to t e County Administrator. The Commission has also endorsed the concept of reorganizing the Parks Division and utilizing the old shop building at the William Byrd Intermediate School aofao raoarkfmaintenanceravel time and improving the efficiency operations. D, Sale of Surplus Properties ro erties currently under the management of the Several p P Department of Parks & RecreatiotheaCountyn ofdRoanoke. aThese candidate property for sale by properties will not likely evee saleeoflsuch propertieslcouldkbe land and said proceeds from th ment to be used within used to provide additional capital equip the park properties. E. Use of the Y Came at Spring Hollow Reservoir The Parks & Recreation Commission reuomeandenovationseandte attention be given to making minimalneaq the site of the Spring repairs to facilities of the Y camp Hollow Reservoir. Unless such maintenance items are cared for in L-I the foreseeable future, the facilities will continue to deteriorate until they are unuseable. F. Future Adoption of the Proposed Park Ordinance At the present time, Roanoke County does not haersons in comprehensive ordinaarksr&gRecreationeDepar tmentfhas worked with public parks. The P and School Division in the County Attorney, Commonwealth Attorney bein reviewed by preparing a drereationnCommission.1Sltuiseanticipated that this the Parks & Re draft ordinance will be foriond aadtadoptionard of Supervisors in April, 1989, for considerat Recommendations 1. Implement the proposed FEES AND CHARGES POLICY which could result in an estimated $70,000 increase lnesteda that these departmental revenues. It is further sugg ark maintenance revenues be used to finance tworaod ndslmaintenance equipment. workers and to provide needed g (This program has been referred to the County Administrator for consideration in the budget process.) 2, Approve the proposed reorgVinZSt fn3°500hmanahourslannually. which would result in a sa g artment of Human (This program has been forwarded to the Dep Resources and the County Administrator for consideration in the 'pudget process.) 3. Consider declaring of selected properties as surplus for possible sale. It is further suggested that the proceeds be used to provide capital items for the Parks. (A specific report tore dater~ught to the Board of Supervisors at a fu ~, Considering transferring the grounds maintenance ersonnel to responsibilities at the Fire Stations with paid p the individual fire stations. This woe~d earulmost ofnwhich savings of manpower of 865 man hours p Y - is travel time. (Thonsideredtinsthelbudgetlprocesst) Mr. Fuqua and will be c 5. Consider at a future meeting the proposed ordinance to govern conduct in the public parks (including parks at school sites.) ~~ COUNTY OF ROANOKE DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION GROUNDS/OUTDOOR SPORTS FACILITITES MAINTAINED 782.25 AC PARRS & RECREATION CENTER GROUNDS 65.29 COUNTY FACILITY GROUNDS ~ ~ 31.34 VACANT LOTS AND CEMETERY GROUNDS. ---- TOTAL GROUNDS MAINTAINED 879 AC OUTDOOR SPORTS FACILITIES MAINTAINED 51 (42 LIGHTED) TENNIS COURTS ~ 16 ( 3 LIGHTED ) SOCCER FIELDS ~ 23 ( 3 LIGHTED ) BASKETBALL COURTS 51 (17 LIGHTED) BASEBALL/SOFTBALL FIELDS. 5 ( 5 LZGHTED) FOOTBALL FIELDS • 146 (70 LIGHTED? TOTAL OUTDOOR FACILITIES MAINTAINED •~ COUNTY OF ROANOKE ~ ~~ DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION PARKS/GROUNDS INVENTORY 1984/1989 427.5 acres 1984 Existing Parkland/Grounds - In service 413.0 acres 1988 Existing Parkland/Grounds - In service -'-' ~ 782.25 acres 1989 Existing Parkland/Grounds - In service 369.25 acres Increased Acreage (1988/89) 8=$ Percent Increase (1988/89) PARKS DELETED SINCE 1984 33.6 acres GLENVAR (Behind school) 2,8 acres CATAWBA CENTER ~ 5,75 acres EAST VINTON ELEMENTARY. 4.5 acres COVE ROAD TOTAL 46.35 acres NEW PARKS IN - SERVICE, 1989 225 acres GREENHILL PARK 3,5 acres SADLER PARR ~ 34.5 acres HAPPY HOLLOW GARDENS. 13,7 acres STARKEY PARK 41.2 acres VINYARD PARK 51.35 acres STOyEBRIDGE PARR • ' TOTAL 369.25 acres NEW PARKS IN - SERVICE, 1989 ADDITIONAL TURF MAINTENANCE ARENA (Grass Mowing) 75.0 acres ' ~ ~ ~ 3.5 acres GREENHILL PARK • SADLER PARR ~ 0.0 acres HAPPY HOLLOW GARDENS 11,7 acres . • STARKEY PARR 34.2 acres VINYARD PARK ~ 25.6 acres STONEBRIDGE PARK • TOTAL 150.0 acres 1988 228.4 acres Mowing Rcreage, 150.0 acres Increased Mowing Acreage, 1988-1989 65.7 $ Percent Increase 1988-19.89. ---• ~-i COUNTY OF ROANOKE DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION PUBLIC ASSESSMENT SURVEY PROJECT In September, 1987, Roanoke County Parks and Recreation Committee", to discuss, Department formed an "Image Standing erceived evaluate and determine o these tizensf fh RoanokemCounty as well "Image", as it relates t as other identified "image targets" as indicated below: ~, Parks and Recreation Department; 2, General Public; 3• County Board of Supervisors; 4. Other RoanokerCounty Departments; 5. 6 . ~ ~ News Media ; 7, Virginia Recreation and Park Society; g. Other Government Jurisdictions. An Internal Survey was conducted whereby Parks and Rec- oiled to discover what they felt the reation employees were p Department's "Image" was in relation to with thevexceptionlof targets. A short survey of all targets, erce tions of General Public was COrelationsoimagermine ext__ ernal p P the Department public As a result of these two (2) preliminary surveys, the Image ective Standing Committee determined tharthe herimaryecommitteesobjd ec- reation could be improved • of a valid, scientific survey to focused toward the conducting e„ of the Parks and Recreation determine the external "Imag Department as perceived by the General Public (Target #2)- Among. the information benefits aoebe obtained as a result of the General Public~Assessment Survey -Public opinion of Parks and Recreation Department and general attitudes about Recreation; -Demand for services currently available and demand for other services not available but desired; -Identification of County residents related needs, attitudes and interests; riorities; -Identification of capital impaotmenttshort and long range -Direct citizen input into dep goals and objectives; -Direct citizen input into Parks and Recreation master planning process; anding services; -Justification of current and/or exp -Determination of the importance of Leisure Services to the community and quality of life impact. L-/ The committee rapidly moved toward completion of the survey uestionnaire. The Department of Parks and Recreation assessment q Recreation Resources Director and worked closely with John Davy, of the State of Virginia a Nancy Almond, Recreation Consultant, doctoral Division of Parks and Recreation and Denis eaci alities and m VPI. Several meetings were heldwith other graduate student fro Parks and Recreation assessment questionnding muni p but could counties to develop an the needs of Roanoke County naire that served not only also be adaptable to the needs of other Parks and Recreation Departments throughout the State. and the The Virginia Parks and R loci tion (NRPA) expressed a keen National Recreation and Parks As rocess. interest in the assessment survey and p surve Representatives from thetudenteconductedntwo (2)rks any Parks and Rec ' Recreation .and the VPI graduate s training sessions - one each for Roanoke County Commis- lo ees and the Parks and Recreation Advisory ro er reation emp Y sessions included informatresiden s. p Sion. The training methodology techniques for surveying Roanoke County hone survey results represent a 95$ confidence The telep evel and are therefore a fair ase vice tneedscoattit desa and 1 representation of the leisure interests of Roanoke County residents. he Public Assessment Survey project represents a unique T inia Division action oriented alla~ice/between the State of Virg arks and Rec- 'on Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State of Parks and Recre University and the Roanoke County Department of Assessment in cooperation with the National reation. The State of Virginia will publish a Public Recreation and Park Association, com uter software Surve Technical mentala~urisd ctionslthroughopt the United for use by govern States (a first in the nation). the State The _project has been financi~laYmiP°malydarect monetary Division of Parks and Recreation a ' cost to Roanoke County. i ~, Signed: Date: Au ust, 1988 v c-~ i e t s TABLE OF CONTENTS - `IMAGE" STANDING COMMITTEE - GOALS AND OBJECTIVES - PRIORITY IMAGE TARGETS - PUBLIC ASSESSMENT SURVEY ANALYSIS - RECOMMENDATIONS _ - PUBLIC ASSESSMENT SURVEY RESULTS - ANALYSIS - PUBLIC ASSESSMENT QUESTIONNAIRE - 7•~~ --- -_ - INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE PUBLIC ASSESSMENT QUESTIONNAIRE -DEFINITIONSS~REF. QUESTION A~4RE - INSTRUCTIONS FOR SELECTION OF -- TELEPHONE NUMBERS - SAMPLING a L-1 COUNTY OF ROANOKE - DEPARTMEIv r OF PA`S ~ CREATION "IMAGE" STANDING COMMITTEE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES _ GOALS: 1, To establish an effective program which will result in maximizing a positive image perception of the Department of Parks and Recreation. ualit leisure and park delivery services 2, To improve and expand q y ro ram. through a successful image building p g ' OBJECTIVES: 1. To identify the significance, meaning and role of i:..age building as a component of daily operations; ' rioritize image targets affecting --_ 2, To identify and p ~ department operations; t - 3, To identify and determine internal department perceptions ~- of image targets; q, To identify and determine external image target perceptions of department; ' ---- ~-.-° 5, To identify prioritized image problems; 6. To establish an image program plan of action to mitigate image problems; ro ram of action to improve image 7, To establish an image p g targets not identified as problematic; !~ ' ~ ion to effectively monitor, evaluate g. To establish plan of act ro rams. ~:~ and improve image action p g 4e - 0 L-/ 7 a 'r ~ ~ ~ w ~ z ~ ~- ~ ~ Q ~~ W , ~ o d a. ~ ~ o W _ t P- 4 ~ = ----- ~~ i,~ L-/ PUBLIC ASSESSMENT SURVEY ASSESSMENT PHASES I, RESEARCH SURVEY TECHNIQUES AND METHODOLOGY II. DEVELOP ASSESSMENT SURVEY MISSION STATEMENT AND OBJECTIVES III.. PREPARATION OF ASSESSMENT QUESTIONNAIRE IV. DISSEMINATION OF SURVEY TO PUBLIC V, COMPILATION OF SURVEY RESULTS pI, EVALUATION OF SURVEY RESULTS AND DEVELOPMENT OF ACTION -- ORIENTED RECOMMENDATIONS VII. - PREPARATION AND PUBLICATION OF PUBLIC ASSESSMENT --- --- TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE MANUAL VIII:-- MONITOR STATUS OF PUBLIC ASSESSMENT RECOMMENDATIONS November 30, 1987 t~ '~` COUNTY OF ROANORE pgpARTKENT OF PARRS AND RECREATION PUBLIC ASSESSMENT SORVEY ANALYSIS MAJOR CONCLQSIONS) 958 SCIENTIFIC CONFIDENCg~LSVEL - Roanoke County Residents feel that mainta=iio~=tezi2t 8708COthan ap rks has approzimately three times the p Y acquiring new ap rks (1.0008) and a higher priority than recreation additional ark develo went (2.3788) and providing programs 2.7918 ; - Additional Park Development is more important to County additional parklands; residents than acquiring recreation program services is more important - Providing to County residents than both Parx ~evelo went (marginal) and park acquisition (significant ; - County residents significantly believe Park Maintenance, Recreation Programanera=keacauisptionDeve o mp ent have a highcr_pri~ritY Z - A large., percentage (83.978) of all County residents are more concerned about mainta=klandsz(161038)acilities and marks than acquiring new p - 77.148_of County residents abe goanokeeCounty while3~13s888 recreation programs offered y are-not-'satisfied. 8.988 have no opinion; - A majority of the population (58.378) feel that department parks and recreation services should be expanded to better meet resident's needs. 2010088havenno opinion;eXpansion of services is needed and - A high=percentage (74.698) of all County residents are satisfied with the parks provided by the Couarks new ver, almost one-half (47.76$) think that County p maintenance improvement; - Over sizty percent (608) of the general up blic is satisfied with the quality of County recreation facilities (61.438) and the appearance and condition of County recreatioulationrs (62.408); however, one quarter of the County PoP earance (25.218 ) is ngtasatalmost 208h (16e468 )dare dissatisfied With of the center the gaality of ezisting County recreation facilities; L-- / - Almost 758 of County residents visit County parks (74.77$) with 69.648 visiting parks at least once per month. Appprox- imately 108 of the population uses County parks at least 3-5 times weekly (9.538); - One (1) out of three (3) County residents (29.328) participate in County sponsored recreation programs and (1) in (4) (25.26$) visit recreation centers. The most predominate reason stated for not visiting centers or registering for programs cited is "no time' available; - The most popular recreation activity in Roanoke County is community-wide special events, with a participation level of almost 508 (49.738); however, a full 608 majority (62.408) of all residents believe that the County does not offer enough special events; - At least (1) in (4) County residents participate in team or individual athletics, nature programs and special events; - The largest reason for not participating in current recreation activities is a "lack of interest" (43.878 mean), followed by a mean of 13.198 who ezpressed a "lack of personal time" to participate. 4.668 of non-participants were not aware of the services being offered to the general public. Only 1.218 of non-participants indicated that parks and recreation services fees block their participation; L - County residents have available time to participate in leisure activities most often on Saturday afternoons (71.028), followed by weekday evenings (68.988), Sunday afternoons (66.53$) and Saturday evenings (62.36x); - When_asked the question if they think the department should provide more active types of program activities than passive or if the current mix is about right, over one-half of all. residents agree with the current mix with an almost equal percentage of the population balance favoring either active or passive recreation activities; - Seventy percent (70.178) of residents believe that future ' park development should provide abort the same miz for .organized league and program use as being left open for general public ase development; however, those favoring a different miz, favor emphasizing general public use (22.278) over organized league/program use of parks (21.948); - The majority of County residents (56.028) would consider ' increased admission fees to County facilities (picnic shelter rentals, room rentals, etc.) as a way to pay for park facility maintenance. 43.988 do not favor this approach; L-1 -Seven (7) of ten (10) County residents (70.12$) would be willing to consider paying hisheT registration fees for recreation programs, with approximately thirty percent (29.88$) disagreeing. - 41.228 of County residents would consider a tax increase or voted bond issue to pay or new recreation facilities. 38.788 would not consider an additional taz proposal and 20.008 do not have an opinion; - When asked if the Parks and Recreation Department projects a good image throughout the County, the vast majority of residents (85.258) stated "yes", with 9.848 indicating there ezists definite room for public relations improvement. Approzimately five percent (4.928) had no opinion; - 57.238 of the County population feel they are properly informed about department activities; however, the balance of County residents either feel they are not Mell informed (8.168) or did not express an opinion (28.578). ANALYSIS BY: '-- Step en B. Car ter, -- -__ Director of Parks and Recreation ~- DATE : ,~ ~`~ e ~-! CDUN•Z'Y OF RL~I30FCE DEpp,RTrSII~Tr OF PARKS AND RECREATION PUBLIC ASSESSMENT SURVF'Y ANALYSIS RDCOMI~Ni]ATIONS ION; Budget appropriations should be increased to provide a 1. RE`IDAT existing county parks. greater priority emphasis on maintaining 2, g~O~q~IDATION: Greater ezn~asis ~~ty parks in lieu of acquiring development should be placed on maintaining existing new parklards and additional park TION: Additional parklands should not be acquired without first 3. RDCON4KEZ`~ providuig required resources to maintain existing parks. 4, g~p~IDATION: Future moderate to major park development and/or roved without the prior completion of a acquisition should not be aPP ntl roved for Maintenance and Operations Impact Study. which is subseque y app ' additional required funding. . ION; park maintenance, recreation services and park development 5. RDCOM~`~T isition. should have a higher priority than new parklarr3 acqu 6, ~Orq~ATION: Expand public parks and recreation services through -~ cost-ef ective operations, innovation, providing only meaningful - activities, establishing an increased county government awareness of the importance of quality parks ar~d recreation services for au COS~a ion fees residents, and revenue enhancement through increased user/reg and .general fund txxlget appropriations. -~-°-- ~. R~O~ATION: Improve the condition and appearance of exisitng county _recreation centers where functionally and econ°mically feasible and --_ consider alternate facility locations/capital fording, as deemed _ appropriate through study analysis. Recreation Division coarnunity-wide special event ' - . g . R~pATION : Expend opportunities for the general public. g, RECOTION: Substantially maintain the current mix of future park development for active general public use and Spa.sive use °pP°~~ities. 10. R~-O,TION• Improve the quality of effectiveness of current Parks and Recreation Department public relations, publicity and the delivery of services through the establishment of a forum marketing pro9r~. one°~ applicable staff in-service training programs and an active staff ' professional develogrent program. 11. RDCOTION: Continue the developmPS~t and impleme~ztation of a meaningful and realistic managenent by objectives program for all department services and functions. ..~, -_- 9 L-I TION: Stimulate and motivate ~nLmity interest in Programs - 12. R~-'O~D~' nt of programs by other agencies where through encouraging the develo~ne 1 ~) contracting for facilities arr3 services' practical (~ ~ - oint use of facilities and services. providing for maximized j rovide staff training and Professional 13. RDC~`q,~TIpN: Guide, council and P e cost effective leisure develognent opportunities whic'~ will encou~ arY3 ideas. services expansion and innovation of p og h the establishmP~t of 14. RE`~'TI~= Increase financial resous phi osophy fee policy. i an equitable and complete fees and charg lenient innovative revenue producing 15. RDCOI~t`ID~TION: Seek out au73 ~P roducing ies through such avenues as privitization, revenue presource ' strateg rise fund projects, cccnnunity facilities operated as enterp marketing program. volunteer and active donation programs and a sound rk maintenance and esthetic standards 16. ION: Establish formal pa k excellence and substantially h P guarantee a standard of par 1 w ion image. . i~roved public percept ' tralize Parks arxi Grounds Maintenance functions 17• ION: Decen Districts as through the establi~nent of four (4) Park Maintenance follows: District; -North Roanoke Park Maintenance _ Vinton Park Maintenance District; _ __ -Cave S ri Park Maintenance District; -Glenvar Park Maintenance District. arters in each 18. RDCOtTI~. Establish a Park Maintenance District Fieadqu of the proposed districts: Walrond Park; ~~ Imanoke District - Vinton District -Gearhart Park; --_-_ -Cave Spring District - Starkey Park; -~--_ - -Czlenvar District -Green Hill Park. --" on the maintenance requirements of each district, 19._ ~~mATION: ~-~ i t ~ appropriate decentralized allocate existing .(non-replacPSnent).equ Pin district. lacesnent SON: Properly equip each Park district through the rep 20. RDCOMI~`~ ___~r~,a~ of maintenance vehicles and equiP~nt• rc~ of each rk district through the Pu 21. RATION: Properly equip Pa new not replacement) vehicles arx3 equip~t- ablish and implement a ~puterized Groundsr~ ~ ~ce 22. 1tDC0I~2~TI0N: F.st ar~d MBO software program in order to p S arcs, Cost Tracking rations. maximized cost-effective maintenance oPe t organizational ~ . R~0pggrmATION: provide a Parks and Recreation Departmen ~nployee reclassification system which will enh,a~ ~inistrative ' ._..~sstrategies. L-! TION: Encourage staff participation, the right to be wrong, 24. RECON~DA and creative work errvirot~nnent and develoFcnent of ideas, a noo in~tan ~t~ Parks and Recreation as a pride in self, the County profession. 25. gECpI"~'g~`]DATION: Authorize the Roanoke County Parks and Recreation Advisory feasibility, advisability, proposed timing, Cam-ission to study the need, lic bond referendtsn strategies and content for the conduct of a general pub for the selected improvement arxi developments ~ the ~ ~ ~~is-t~ration system and to subsequently.recocnnend finding and Board of Supervisors by Novemmber 15, 1989. p,PpRWED BY: THE PARKS AND R~FATION AfnTISORY COMMISSION DATE: Se~t-ember 15, 1988 o __ ~~ L-/ Instructions for tltc Public Opinion Questionnaire Getting Started Before you attempt to conduct any interviews, you will need the following materials: • A number of Public Opinion Questionnaires. • A Screening Question Checksheet;. • A Reasons for not Participating and a Frequency of Use card (these two cards may be on a single sheet of paper). • A notepad and pen. • A phone book or a list of phone numbers to call. • Access to a clock, a watch, or some other timepiece. • These instructions. In addition, before you make any phone calls you iVIUST carefully read th~xe instructions. . Take a few minutes to read through the Public Opinion Questionnaire. As you read it, refer to the in- structions for each question listed on this sheet. After you feel reasonably comfortable with the question- naire, try reading the entire questionnaire aloud, just as if you were conducting an actual inter~lew. If possible, run throu~~ the questionnaire with another person (preferably someone who has never seen the qucstionnauc before). All of this may stem a bit silly, but it is very important that you be completely fa- miliar with the interview process before you make your first phone call. --- -=--_ -_:_.- St~rtin the inter~~icw ProcctS I Unce you have become familiar with flit questionnaire and have gathered all the necessary materials, you ------°`' '° "'are ready to begin surveying. Try to make sure you will not be disturbed while on the phone, and arrange your materials so that you can reach all of them while on the phone. Do not fill in any of the blarilcs on _____ __ the questionnaire until after you have completed the first three survey questions (the reasons for this will become obvious once you've examined questions 1 through 3). --=J'`=1Viake sure you fully understand what phone numbers you are to call. If you have any doubts on this t _ - _ -- matter, get in touch with the person supervising the survey. L Instructions for Question 1 Question 1 simply asks the respondent if they live in the survey's study area. If the respondent does not live in this area, they can not participate in the survey. Therefore, if the respondent indicates that they live -------~ udldarea and end the interviewpl Place a check h hetLived Outside Area of In eres~ coleumn of the Screen ' s y Qu~xtions ChcckShcct. If the respondent indicates that they do live in the area of interest, do not mark anything and go on to question 2. Beware of nested localities! ror example, if Smith City is located entirely within Smith County, some of the people actually living in Smith City will say that yes, they do live in Smith County. This can pose -_----problems. You as an interviewer must be aware of such potential problems, and when necessary must ask the respondent a few added questions to make sure that they do not live in a nested locality (In the above example, if a person indicates that they live in Smith County, you may have to ask, "Uo you live in Smith City?"). ~~ Instructions fur Question 2 Question 2 simply asks the respondent if they want to participate in the survey. If the respondent indicates that they do not want to participate, simply thank them and end the interview. Place a checkmazk in the Refused to Participate column of the Screen Questions CheckSheet. The respondent may also indicate that they would like to participate but they are too busy at the moment. In this case, you should ask them when would be a good tune to call back. Make yourself a note on your notepad and be certain to call back at the arranged time. If the respondent indicates that they are ready to participate right away, do not mazk anything and move on to question 3. Instructions for Question 3 This questions is designed to prevent households from responding to the survey more than once. If the respondent indicates thnce eer householdCtand end theyinterview t Placee atcheclcmazk in the Contacted be administered only o p Previously column of the Screen Questions CheckSl~cct. If the respondent indicates that no one in the household has been contacted previously, you ~o~ation o that you have contacted a valid interview respondent. Thus, you fill in all the prcluninary the top of the questions ~re(for a resoo d n thattlat erlturned out to be 'invalid), and move on t question using an enure questtonn P 4. Instn~ctions for Questions 4,5 anJ 6 These questions are designed to find out what recreational activities arc important to people. Since you are -=> ==onlyarying to find out what activities are important, it doesn't matter if a person parttcipates in an activity --without being involved with the agency conducting tlus study. - Read the question's introductory remarks to the respondent. Make sure that they understand that you want to_know if they participate c ~Cn stunely start off wr~ h~he first ct vity listedct'Do you or any member _ _ agency conducting the surv y P of-your household <-participate in activity 1 >?" ^_` If _the respondent indicates that yes, they do participate in an activity, ask two follow up questions: --- `,~ eo le from our household < participate in the activity > ?" write • = Including yourself, how many p P Y ~--this number in the Number Participat~g~c ate in the activity > ?" Compare the respondent's answer to • How often would you say you p P the answers listed in the questionnaire (these frequencies are defined on the Frequency of Use card) and place a check mark in the appropriate column. ' - If the respondent indicateosRh are the respo dent s reason with the reasonPlisted on hetquestionnaire (these _ _ _-2he}cdon't participate. C p reasons are defined on your Reasons for not Participating card), and place a checkmazk in the most ap- - propriate column. ----Questions 5 and 6 are identical to question 4 except that instead of reading a list of activities you are letting the respondent fill in any additional activities that were not listed in question 4. If the respondent lists any additional activities for either of these questions, write in the activities in the appropriate spaces and proceed __ _-with=the rest of the question just as you did in question number 4. e =- L-~ Instructions for Qucsti~n 7 This question is designed to find out when people have free time for recreation. The instructions are quite simple and are fully explained on the questionnaire. Instructions for Question 8 This question is designed to find out how the public perceives the relative importance of four different as- pects of the.recreation department's operations. For this question to work, it is critical that the respondent fully understands what each of the terms being compared means. Thus, each of the terms is defined on the questionnaire. Notice that 4 of the items iit the list are followed by an (F). This means that this is the first time that particular item has appeared in the list. When you encounter an item followed by an (F), read the item and then its dcfuation. For example, if your questionnaire looks like this: Definitions Recreation Programs Trips and classes sponsored by the Parks and Recreation Department, such as fitness pro~ams, athletic leagues, and arts and crafts classes. Park Maintenance The upkeep of county parks, such as lawncare, maintenance of playground equipment, and litter control. Park Development Improvements to existing parks, such as the addition of new playground equipment or the construction of new atlilctic facilities at an existutg park. Park Acquisition Purchasing land for new parks. Recreation Programs (r) or Park Maintenance (r) __ Park Dcvelopmcnt (r) or Park Acquisition (C) Park M:antcnancc or Park Dcvelopmcnt Recreation Pro~ams or Park Development __ Park Acquisition or Recreation Pro~ams "- - - Park Maintenance or Park Acquisition You would start off by saying, "`Vlach do you think is more important: recreation. programs, which are trips and classes offered by the parks and recreation department, or park maintenance, which is the upkeep of county parks?" In latter comparisons, you do not have to read the definitions again, but be certain that the respondent understands each term as you read through the list. Repeat the definitions and examples as often as needed. When the respondent indicates which of two items they feel is more important, place a checkmark next to that item. Instructions for Question 9 This question is designed to measure the public's opinion of a series of statements regazding the recreation department. The directions for this question aze quite simple and aze listed on the questionnaire. Instructions for Qucsti~ns 10, 11 and 12 Each of these questions are designed to find out what the public would like to see the recreation department do in the future. These questions are very simple and are fully explained on the questionnaire. L-~ Instructions for Questions 13, 14 and I S These questions arc designed to find out how the public feels about various ways of funding the recreation department. The questions themselves are very straightforwazd, but some individuals may not be com- pletely clear as to what is meant by "admission fees" or "registration fees". Some examples that might be useful m explaining these terms are: • An admission jee to reserve a picnic shelter. • An admission fee to use a swimming pool. • An admission jee to reserve an athletic field. • A registration fee to participate in a rock climbing trip or other high adventure type program. • A registration jee to participate in an athletic league. ' • A registration jee to participate in an arts and crafts class. Instructions for Questions 16, 17 and 18 These questions simply record the demographic characteristics of the people being surveyed. Tlus infor- mation is useful in determining the validity of the survey's results. The questions in this section are very simple and the directions aze listed on the questionnaire. Instructions for Questions 19 and ZO "Question" 19 is included simply to remind you to end the interview on a positive note. Question 20 Gives you the opportunity to make any comments you think may be useful. These included complements, criti- sizes and suggestions offered by the respondent, notes on how long the interview took, and comments in- ' - ---"dicating how valid you feel the respondent answers were. Por example, if the respondent was distracted and interrupted numerous times while on the phone and was obviously not thinking about their answers, you `-------- -°~`should make a note stating these facts. " I'inisl~in~ TJp _ -Once you have completed all your interviews, add up the totals on the Screen Questions CheckShcet and _°'-"Tccord the number of completed interviews in the space provided on the checksheet. Return all of your ----materials to the survey supervisor for analysis. "' QUESTION NUMBER 4 ......DEFINITIONS COMMUNITY SPECIAL EVENTS - Cultural anecreationoDepartmentsies not regularly offered by local Parks and R PLAY GOLF - Taking Part in the game of golf. ATHLETICS/TEAM OR INDIVIDUAL - Team sports. sulndividual~such asall, basketball, volleyball, softball and soccer.. Distance Runs, Tennis, etc. ONAL OR VOCATIONAL PROGRAMS - The types of programs not offered EDUCATI by the school sustem~. PROGRAMS FOR THE PHYSICALLY AND MENTALLY HANDI~AProDidedoin general individuals needing adaptation or structure no p programs. CULTURAL PROGRAMS - Programs having to do with thsicrclasseshorssYmPhony shoWS/classes, dance classes or entertainment, mu entertainment, creative writing, acting/drama, etc. PROGRAMS - Those programs relating to the appreciation of the NATURE outdoors, such as~ bird watching. nature trails, etc. SENIOR ADULT PROGRAMS - Any Programs adapted for a person 55 years or older. HIGH ADVENTURE./ OUTDOOR PROGRAMS - Outdoor adventurbin surapPellingte water rafting, kayakinS, canoiing, scubagdiving,csailing. backpacking. cross country and downhill sk g biking, camping and ropes course. HORSE RIDING - Any equestrian activity. _ TY RECREATION PROGRAMS - Recreational, educational, social and COUN cultural leisure opportunities offered in 8 mayor program selections, Y Roanoke County Parks and Recreation. -VISIT COUNTY RECREATION CENTERS - To visit or participate in program activities offered in the four County Recreation Centers. VISIT COUNTY PARKS - Visiting one of. the 47 County Parkuefspo=~sive~Ces, such as: picnicing, walking. 3oBging, playBreunds, leag ~-! REASONS FOR NOT PARTICIPATING I. Not Interested. No one in the household fords the activity enjoyable. 2. Not Enough 'lime. No one in the household has enough time to participate in the activity. 3. Unacceptable Hours of Operation. The facility required to participate in this activity is not open when the members of the household would like to use it. 4. -Too Expensive. The activity either costs too much or requires prohibitively expensive equipment. 5. Did not Know Activity Was Available. No one in the household knew that this activity was available to them. . 6. Too Far to Travel. It is too far for the people in the household to travel to reach a place where they can participate in the activity. 7. Too Crowded. There are unacceptably large crowds at the places where members of the household can participate in this activity. 8. Unsatisfied with Available Facilities. For some reason other than crowding the available facilities where members of the household can participate in the activity aze unacceptable. 9. Facilities I\'ot Available. The respondent would like to participate in the activity, but the required fa- cilities aze not available. ' FREQUENCY OF USE I. Daily in Season. The household member(s) participate almost every day (6 or 7 times a week) when- u _ ___ ~ ever it is convenient to engage in this activity. ---=_=~ Three to Five Times a Week in Season. The household member(s) participate in the activity 3 to 5 - -.- - times a week when it is convenient to engage in this activity. 3. Weekly in Season. The household member(s) participate in this activity once or twice a week whenever it is convenient to engage in the activity. 4. Monthly in Season. The household member(s) participate in the activity once or twice a month whenever it is convenient to engage in the activity. __ . 5. `Yearly or Seasonally. The household member(s) participate in the activity once or twice a year or . -_ _ - .season. L -/ Public Opinion Questionnaire -Version 7.10 Date: Time: Phone number. In book: - Random: Interview Number: name is I'm conducting a survey for the Roanoke County Parks and Recre- l. "Hello, my ation Department. We're e~n issu s~Do you liveeui IRoanoke County ort~inton?mton to get then opinions on parks and recr • If YES, go on to question 3. • If .NO, thank the respondent, inform them that the survey is intended for indi- viduals within Roanoke County or Vinton, and hang up. Check the space on the Screening Question CheckSheet indicating that the respondent lived outside the arcs of interest. ' 2, "Would you be willing to spend about 10 minutes to participate in this survey?" ~-"- : ff YES, go on to question 2. --• If NO, and if the respondent implies that you have called at an inconvenient time, - ask if you may call back some other time. IuestionspCheckSheet indicating hat _ - ticipate, check the space on the Screening Q _ the respondent refused to participate. _ 3.J~„Have you or some other member of your household been contacted regarding this survey anytune m ___-_ _-= t-he last 3 weeks?„ • If .YES, thank the respondent, tell them that this survey is intended for house- holds not contacted previously, and hang up. Check the space on the Screening Questions CheckSheet indicating that the respondent was contacted previously. -t If NO, fill in the information on top of this page and go on to question 4. ' _ e l L-I 4. "Now I would like to ask you a few questions about the types of recreationalt ~rle~adethrou ana li tof members of your family who live at home with you participate in. I'm going arl ~~ ate in activities and I would like to know if you or any member of your household regal y p p , these activities. It does not matter if the Roanoke County Parks and Recreation Department is in- volved in your participation in these activities, we simply want to know what activities are important to you and your family." Read the directions on, the Instruction Sheet very carefully before pro- ceeding with this question. Participates Does Not Participate C ..y z C s `~' ~ a O E o ~ !./~ ±~ ~' • ~ r, _ o ~- t'" G O '~ N rr p J w O 6 C O O C C ~ ~ ~ `'~' O ~ < '" r n b ,. d ~ ~ rs ~ "' ~ ~, ~ ~ c ~ .n ~ .a ~ '" <' Play Golf - - - - - - Athlctics~Tcam or Individual Educational or Vocational Programs Programs for the Physically and vlcntally handicapped. Cultural Programs Nature Programs - - - - - - (Camping) Senior Adult _. - - - - Programs High Adventure - ._ - - - - Outdoor Programs Horse Riding - - ._ - - - Community - - - - - - Special Events County Recreation - - - - - - Programs Visit County - - - - - - Recrcation Centers Visit County - - - - - - Parks 2 ~. 5. Are there any other activities that you or some other member of your household currently participate ~~ in that I have not mentioned?" If the respondent lists any additional activities, fill them in below in the same manner as question number 4. `~ cr `~" '.. Iy~ ~. r+ N `~• ~ ~ o O ~ ~ rs ~ Activity ~~ ,~~-' ~. ~ ~ 6. "Arc there any other activities that you or some other member of your household would like to par- ticipate in that I have not mentioned?" ___._': _ ~ ~ If the respondent lists any additional activities, fill them in below in the same manner as question number 4. d c: w z a .: o ~. ~'J p o, y y r+ Or. ~. O C n N ~ ~ 0 ~ a. Activity '" 3 L-~/ 9. "Now I am going to read a number of statements about the Roanoke County Parks and Recreation Department. For each statement, please tell me whether you agree with the statement, disagree with the statement, or have no opinion." Read each of the following statements and record the respondent's an- swers. For each statement the respondent disagrees with, ask the follow up question, "tiVhy do you feel that way?" Record the respondent's an- swer (in one or two words) in the Disagreeing Comments Column. No Disagreeing Agree Opinion Disagree Comments In general, I am satisfied with the types of programs offered by the Roanoke County Parks and Recreation Department. In general, I am satisfied with the pazks provided by Roanoke County. In general, I am satisfied with the way Roanoke County maintains its parks 'The county should offer more community-wide special events. In general, I am satisfied with --~ the appearance and condition of __ . __~.~. county recreation centers. ----~ In general, I think that county _ . _ parks need maintenance improvement. -------- I am satisfied with the quality of _ _____ recreation facilities in Roanoke --:--' County. '- ----_~ The parks and recreation department - - should expand its services to better meet the needs of Roanoke County citizens. I am properly informed about the activities offered by the Roanoke _:__-, County Pazks and Recreation . Department. __ .-_ In general, I think the pazks and recreation department projects a good image. 5 ~. ~- 10. "Now I would like to ask you a few questions relating to-what you would like to have the Roanoke County Parks and Recreation Department do in the future. If you were forced to choose, would you rather see more of the department's pazks, athletic fields, and other facilities used for organized leagues and programs, or more of the department's facilities left open for general use by the public, or do you think the current mix of uses is about right?" Facilities used for organized leagues and programs. Facilities left open for the general public. , Current mix is about right. 11. "Would you rather have the department provide more active types of recreation, such as athletics, ad- venture trips, and fitness classes, or would you rather have more passive types of recreation, such as arts and crafts classes, sightseeing trips, and cultural programs, or do you think the current mix of active and passive recreation is correct?" Active recreation. Passive recreation. Current mix is about correct. 12. "Would you like to have the department emphasize maintaining and improving its existing parks and facilities, or would you like to have the department acquire new parks and facilities?" Maintain existing parks and facilities. - Acquire new parks and facilities. 13.~ "Now we would like to ask you a few questions about funding. Please keep in mind that all of these -- -- ~ questions are completely hypothetical; any actual attempt to change the funding for the parks and re- creation department would have to be approved by the local govemmcnt and the voters." ___ -_-_ -_ "With that in mind, would you be willing to consider a tax increase or a bond issue to pay for new recreation facilities?" -- _-_-_ ___ Would consider a tax increase and/or a bond issue. Would not consider either a tax increase or a bond issue. - -- - No Opinion. 14. "Would you be willing to consider paying increased admission fees to use county facilities as a way - - of paying for the maintenance of the department's facilities?" See Instruction Sheet for examples of admission fees Would consider increased admission fees for maintenance. Would not consider increased admission fees for maintenance. ._ _.~ -- -__--- 6 L -~ 15. "Would you be willing to consider paying increased registration fees for county recreation programs as a way of paying for these programs?" See the Instruction Sheet for examples of registration fees Would consider registration fees to pay for programs. Would not consider registration fees to pay for programs. 16. "Finally, I would like to ask you a few questions about your household. We need this information in order to make sure the data we collect in this survey truly represents all of the people in Roanoke County and Vinton. Please be assured that all of the information in this section will be absolutely confidential." "Would you please tell me the age of each of the people in your household, and whether they are male or female?" Indicate the number of individuals in each category. If there are no indi- viduals in a given category, leave the line for that category blank. Age Class ~ Male Female 0 to 5 6 to 10 11 to 15 16 to 20 - = 21 to 30 - __ -- - 31 to 45 --:-: 46 to 60 _.--- 60 and up __17~~"Would you mind answering a question regazding your family income?" -~-• If YLS, check the space below and go on to question 18. Respondent refused income question. • If NO, ask "Which of the following categories best describes your family household income?" Under $15,000 per year. $15,000 to $25,000 per year. - $25,000 to $35,000 per year. --- $35,000 to $50,000 per year. -_ - $50,000 to $65,000 per year. --- --~ Over $65,000 per year. 7 i 18. -"Would you describe your household as Black, White, Hispanic, Asiatic, or Other?" Black White Hispanic Asiatic Other 19. "That completes our survey. Thank you very much for your time and cooperation." 20. Interviewer's Comments: 8 ACTION NUMBER A-?2889-9 ITEM NUMBER '"`" AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BO ODNOTY ADMINISTRATION CENTERE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE MEETING DATE: February 28, 1989 SU Receipt of Consultant's Report on Landfill Siting and --- Request to Proceed with Part A Application Process COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The search for a new landfill site for the Roanoke Valley began Since that time, staff and the landfill more than a year ago. consultant, Olver, IncorPorsix mostafeasibleafor your consideray sites and have identified the tion. Attached is a report from Olver, Incorpthetconsultant thstafp six sites. Following a report to the Board by will request permission to forward to the State two of these sites for Part A reviews. After careful ssions withhtheoBoardanI1recommend visits to each site, and work proceeding with the first two siSeX-sBtesshaveapotential if thel Board should be understood that all lication will cost wishes to choose others. Each Part A app approximately $46,000, so it isrecommended becausebthey have xthe one time. The two top sites are best socio-technical characteristics. with a matrix score of 291, is clearly the The Bradshaw site, the consultant's report. It best location, as indicated by consistently scored the highestlpconditions,aimpacts theafewest methods. It has the proper soi homes, and has a 60-year expantbe constructedlfrom theeDixie certain that an access road Caverns exit of I-81, so that landfill vehicles will not use Bradshaw Road. The cost of croads to industrial standa~ds and wibl less than upgrading existing reduce travel time for refuse vehicles. The second site recommo fd ~d 4for Although staf fl expec Bs o~~~ Chapel with a matrix score the State, a second one should be Bradshaw site to be permitted by submitted for concurrent review lcond b v the consultant because it Boones Chapel site was ranked se Y has an expected 25-year life and meebe extendedbtosthe area Band roads chosen, electricity will have to will have to be improved. Otherwise, this is a convenient, technically suitable alternative to the Bradshaw site. -2- The Buck Mountain site, which has a matrix scorero ecte~d wlife have been second in the ranking. However, due to a p J of only 15 years, I have eliminated it from consideration. Of the remaining sites, Mount Pleasant, with a matrix score of 210, and Fort Lewis, 201, are so clos send tf orcPa t Ae roeview oneRed Hi l l other as a third choice to which was 158. received the lowest score of these six, Based on the above, staff prefers to withhold consideration of these sites, pending State review of Bradshaw and Boones Chapel. Because the top two sites are technically and socially aciePtmakes and because submitting Part A applications is expensive, more sense to reserve the remaining four sites for future use if necessary. Having worked closely with the staff and the cothelgoardi believe we have achieve out haveastressed thelneed to locate a new Throughout the process, Y feasible to construct and landfill that is technically sound, operate, while at the same time minimizing the impact on the communities. The Bradshaw sllandfiPlrspaceaforsthe Countye andsour and will provide suitable and Salem have neighbors for many years. Vinton, Roanoso i lispimportant that we expressed an interest in participating, find a site large enough to lshouad concludehthe contractualoarranges Part A reviews, the County should also ments with these localioss bililtyeofoconst uctingyan additional continue pursuing the p Tonal recycling landfill with Bedford County as well as increase reg efforts. This would benefitsaortationJcostsictions by extending landfill life and reducing tran p In conclusion, I would rl and h i sc staf fa and Johnz Hubbard ff or Advisory Committee, John Olve they have approached this most the thorough and compassionate way difficult task. We regret any da fopt the emphasise onhbompensating the County and commend the Boa those affected. RECOMMENDATION: FISCAL IMPACT STATEMENT: Each application submitted for Part A review will cost $46,000. -3- SUBMITTED BY: Elmer C. Hodge Roanoke County Administrator _ Yes X No N REQUIRED: --- RESOLUTIO --------------- ------------------------------------------ V 0 T E A C T I O N Robers/ Garrett Approved (x> Motion by: Richard W• rove Robers Denied ( ) Steven A. McGraw to a Johnson Received ( ) staff recommendation for McGraw Referred Bradshaw Road Site and Nickens to Boones Cha el Site cc: File Assistant County Administrator John Hubbard, Mana ement & Budget Director, g Reta Busher- Director, Finance Diane Hyatt, Yes No Abs X =~- -~- I. EXEICC]'I'IVE SUMMARY 'This executive stutmary is intended to s~rize the preliminary siting evaluations undertaken to evaluate six (6) potential landfill sites. The siting process was begun in excess of a year and a half ago by the Roa- noke Valley Regional Solid Waste Manage~c~e-nt ~osrd (~~) and taken over in November 1988 by the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors. This evaluation is intended to be preliminary in nature, but Yet Provide sufficient techni- cal, engineering, and related information concerning each of the six (6) potential sites such that a decision can be rendered on which sites should be pursued further in the complex landfill permitting process. Ctiirrently, the existing regional landfill operated by the Board has an estimated life expectancy of approximately 3 1/2 years with closure to red b the Department of Waste Man- occur no later than July 1, 1992 as requi Y agem~nt~s (~) Solid Waste Management Regulations, unless a new area is permitted at the existing site. C~,irrently, the option of expansion of the regional landfill at the existing site is limited due to undesirable site conditions in areas previously not permitted. The t~ frame for permit- ~ng, constructing, and operating a new landfill is such that if steps are not taken imrediately to site a new landfill and the siting process pursued with vigor, anew regional landfill will not be located prior to the closure of the existing site. While landfill siting is one of the important issues facing the Roa- noke Valley service area, comprised of Roanoke County, the City of Roanoke. the City of Salem, and the Tawas of Vinton, it is not the only issue of solid waste planning currently under consideration. The Board has recently can- pleted a recycling study encouraging more commercial and industrial recy- cling by revisions in fee structures, along with increased residential recy- cling by the current nrmbers of the Board. Concurrently, the Board is can- 1 pleting an investigation for potential siting of awaste-to-energy facility to reduce the amount of material which must be landfilled and to poten- Bally generate an energy by-product for use by industry in the form of steam or electricity. Solid waste planning must continue to be a coordinat- ed effort comprising a three-prong approach of landfilling, recycling, and consideration of waste to energy. This preliminary siting evaluation while only dealing with the issue of siting a new regional landfill is howev- er a very important and vital part of the overall solid waste management program for the Roanoke Valley Service Area. This preliminary siting evaluation has been conducted over a nine (9) month period and consisted of detailed walkovers of the six (6) potential sites, site borings, preliminary engineering analyses, preliminary cost anal- yses, technical evaluations and considerations, and related studies. A de- tailed matrix analysis form was developed with c~ients and assistance from the Citizen's Advisory Committee (CAC) and the staff of Roanoke County. The CAC has also prepared suggested policy rec~ndations on landfill siting for consideration by the Roanoke County Planning Commission and the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors. These policy issues will bean impor- t part when finalized of the landfill siting process. While sufficient technical and engineering information has been developed such that decisions can be made on the selection of sites for further consideration and permit- ~ng, additional data will be developed on a continuing basis as the siting process proceeds forward. This continued and dynamic data development pro- cess will provide new information at the various permitting steps, including the pmt A permit application and the Part B permit application to the DWNI which may it~act preliminary conclusions or rec~endations contained in this preliminary siting evaluation. Further studies will also be required 2 f for sites chosen in the area of historic and archeological issues, endan- gered species, and groundwater flaw verifications, just to name a few. 't'he detailed matrix analysis of the sites along with the preliminary cost analysis is presented in Table 1.1 of this executive stutmzaLy. Indicat- ed on this table are the matrix ranking of sites, estimated life expectan- cies, and the preliminary development and operational costs of each site, along with a preliminary estimated disposal cost. It was not the intent of this preliminary siting evaluation to accc~lish a detailed transporta- tion analysis of sites which will be required on subsequent phases of the pernu.tting process. The disposal costs ($/ton) indicated is for disposal of solid waste only and is exclusive of transportation or collection costs which will vary for each site and jurisdiction participating in the regional landfill ultimately selected. In the development of these preliminary costs, not only has site developanent of proposed landfill been evaluated, but also access to the site including access roads on and off site, screen- ing of residents, and related factors. It has been assumed in the cost anal- ysis that the existing baler and rolling stock fran the regional landfill will be utilized at the new site along with the installation of other facili- ties and utilities required by the D4~II+~i's regulations. F1~nding of the initial development costs has been presumed to be a revenue or GO bond issue with a payback period of 20 years. An Equipment Reserved Ftimd of $500,000/year and an Environmental Trust Find in lieu of environmental im- pairment liability insurance of $100,000/year for the life of the site have also been provided in the operational cost analysis. It is estimated that the total disposal cost, including transportation, will range between $30- 40/ton based upon the final site selected, evaluation of transportation routes, and potential siting of solid waste transfer stations. 3 ''' o ~ ~' ~--I 'U U L~' !~ G ro ~ '--1 UI ro ~ U o --I o ~ rn ~ o ,-~ M e-I ' N ~ M N a ~ G O .~ 1J rp ~ ~ ~ U ro ~ ro W ,C ~ N U by G fx W to ~ cv1 O~ ~ u'1 N •-~ O~ U N ~ N N +~ G •~ O ~ O ,-~+ r-+ •,-~ µ.~ ~ 'b G ,.Ui a ~ ~ O ~ ~ ro ~ 00 x N n N 00 ~ u'1 ~--i H ~+ U N r-1 N ro O G Fq .~ ...i U ~ ~ a •.~ ~ ~ ~n ~ a ~ oo ~ o ~ o r, d 1J ~ pa C O C!] 3 ro .c ~ ~ ~ P: b ~-, O~ UN ~ ~ ~ o ~ t11 ro N ~ r-i ~D N W n O ~ ~ ~, ro ro ~ O r-a ~ W O ~ '~ U U ro O~ v ~ 00 C!] U ro U ~ ~ ~ ~ k 'C J..1 1J O O ro ,--~ ro a a ~, °N° ro " H x S a o o~ ,-~ •~ v ~ + 1..~ O •rl v ro (~ ~ L+ ~ 3C .r1 CJ ~' ~ ''' ro ~ ~ ~--~ m O ro ~ z ~ +~ I 1J 1J U .4.1 ~ Av }-~ ~ H ro ~ ~ ro ~ ~n ~ ~ A ~ o v w ti w u C Based upon this preliminary siting evaluation, it is recoitmended that the Board of Supervisors and the Board 1. Select sites for further consideration as a potential regional landfill. Sites should be selected based upon the detailed matrix and cost data presented. 2. After selection of sites, a letter of intent should be filed with the DGas for the sites followed by the initiation of the preparation of a Part A application. 3, The Board of Supervisors and Board should continue to pursue re- gional efforts of solid waste planning involving the City of Salem in addi- tion to the adjacent counties of Bedford and Franklin. since technically superior landfill sites potentially exist in these adjacent counties. 4. The work perfornled by the CAC to date in the development of landfill siting policy issues is c~ndable and needs to be further evaluat- ed, refined, and ultimately agreed upon to aid in the permitting of a poten- tial landfill site. 5, Due to the time constraints imposed by the D~~i's regulations for closing of the regional landfill, along with the limited capabilities of expansion of that facility, time is of the essence in order to ensure that a site is found by July 1, 1992. This will not be an easy task and will re- quire the cooperation of many parties along with the assistance of the regu- latory agencies involved. Past landfill sitings indicate that a mi_niirnun of 3-5 years is required from the determinati-on of final sites for considera- tion to actual operation of a new landfill site. 5 i - y ~. Q-~o ~ ~1~ ~ ~ N t ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~*C ~ ~ ~ ~ ) ~ ~ ~~ 1 ~~~ ,~ - BvudsFia~v ,f' ~ ~~ ~ ~~ - `~~ ~y 'Cerra ~~L~l ~, ~ ; ~ ~a, ~ ~ a~ ~~ ~\ ' ~~ ~ _ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~oo\ ~ o \ /\ _.~ ~ ~ ~t6_4 ;~ L_ , v v~< g r~ ~ ~-,~ - lass-„~_ -_ A~ ~ i~`-~~ ~, ~~ ~, ~ `V ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~~ r ' ~ _ ~ ~'i _ ~~ ~ ~ ~ B-2' / ~ N ~~~ ~\ y~ o~. ~ o~ ~` B-3\~ ~~~ ~ ~ ,~zaoo-~ ~ ~ ~ ~- o `~ ~ ~~ ~~,~ ~ T ~'~ ~ ~ -~ % ~-C ,- . -_ ~ ~. ~~ ~ ~ , ~ O. '~ ~~ ~ ,~Q ~ _ ~---" o ~ ~noa--~~--~~-~, ~ ~ <'s~ ~~~ ~~ o '~ ~~ 00 ~~~~ ~ `~~ \~ ~ ~~ ~ JbTIItM I ~~~ ~ ~ 1 ~; 2 ~ ~ ---, ~ , ~- ~- \ '~~ F., ~; 'v ~ ~ A ~~~ ~~_ ~~ , \~\^PROPERTY oINE '\ ^`~ ~, ~:~ ~,~~ ;P~~ ~~~1 ; ^,,~`` ,~ I' \ 1 ~ ~ \O ~~\ 3053 ~~ \ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I \\ ~~ ~ ~ _ A_ ~ ~ ~ ', AAA II ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~i A~)~l ~ %~ V~,A, SCALE: I ~~ = 2000 NOTE: MAP TAKEN FROM U.S.G.S.~ TOPO GLENVAR QUAD. NOTE ° THIS ROUTE IS CURRENTLY BEING EVALUATED FROM A TECHNICAL AND COST STANDPOINT. LEGEND : ~ ~ ~' ACCESS ROAD TO FI L L AREA • BORING LOCATIONS ---PROPOSED .SOLID WASTE FILL AR ----- PROPOSED DEBRIS FILL AREA BRADSHAW-SITE N0. 5R PRELIMINARY SITE DEVELOPMENT FIGURE 10.2 JOB N0. 11136N0. 11136 FEB. 28, 1989 OLVER ~ ~ Z y O ~~ y0 m ~ ~~~ ~ -- ~ _p ,,, ~ -~ ~ 7~ 1~~, ,1 ~~~ ,;, ~ - \~ C .i ,J 'j ', / ~ a~ 7 ' Z ~ o ~ ,`fir ~`"~ // ~ r. ~~ - ~' ~ 3 ~ ~ ~ , o ~ y _~,~ ~-z ~ `,~~ ~ i "~ ~ ~~~ o m ~ ~~ j o ,~' ~ t~ ~ f °, o ,~' ,~ ~ .~ ~ - ~ ;' D D . BOO ~ / ~ ~~ ~~-"- ~~ ca D ~ - _m Z ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ °` - / /,' o ~/ III l~= ~~\ ~ ~ ~ , __ ;, 0 ~~ ~ i'~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ - ,i ~ ~~_ ~ y -1 ~~~ ~_ ~ ~ ~~~ D O - ~~ ~ ~, ~ 2 - - -- ,~ ~" l o ~-1" ~ ~ ~, ~ ~ ~. ~ ' ~. n,Q /,~% ~ ~ ~ _ ~ ~ , " " - ~ = - RI // ~ _ do Z ~ ~/ ;_/'' ~ ~~,~ " . - - ~ t b ~~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~~BI ~ ~ ~ _ _ ~" - ~ ebb ~ ~ i~~ l~ ~" Q DOti. - " / ~ ~ - - L (~ -~ oE2 - ;~~ ° o -- _~ l ,~ ~ ~--- -" e \ ~ _ / _~ ~ ~_ ~ pE2 ~ ' / + ~,~ ~ ,,~ - / ~ \ ~Z_ ,j ,-'~ ~~ •r-..., ~0 .. y - -. ~~ ..r ~ ,a =~ .a // ` r 1~ /-1 ! / P. .i a~C9 ( J ~ ~p~ ~ v£ r~ ~ ~,, - - ' -' ` w n r - o ~ ~ ~ ~ .. ~~ ~. t^ c (~ n TO BLUER I DGE PARKWAY _ b/!G ~l~l/~~ m ~-~ -. .~ ~~ ~ ~-~ ,, - . %~\'\ _ ~'8 J ,~ 1 - __ ~ , SCALE• II ~~ = 2000 ~~F~ NOTE - MAP TA KEG TOPO BENT ~~'p GARDEN CIT '~ ~ r ~ ~io93r PROPERTY LINE, ~\ `~= ~~ ~ ~ ~` ~;, • ~ L ' 3 ~, ~° ~~ ,~ 1 ~~ ~ ~ ~~ f _ ~ (~ ,E r, , ~ ~~ ~- -~~ , ,i LEGEND ~ ~ i ACCESS ROAD T! • BORING LOCATI --- PROPOSED SOL ----- PROPOSED DEE BOONES CHAPEL -SITE N0. 9RR PRELIMINARY SITE DEVELOPME N T FIGURE 10.8 JOB N0. I 1136 _ ~ _ ~:: ~, ~,. ~1. l ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ` ~~' N ~ ~ ~' ,, ~ O - „~ o~ "_~ ~7 -~:_ .~ ~!(4' ~ X600 { --I O -- ~ 1 ~ ~' ~ ~ ~~ ~~~ I ~ i ,/ u /c . i,. e '1~ l ~ ~~~ ~~~ o_ i } 6' m '" C/ ~ _-_~ ~ ~`~'(i ~ ; ~ O '~~ ~ ~ f ,, -~ ' ~__~~ m ~~ , f -; a ~~~~i ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 'QT F~ O ~ l (r ~f~_ _f~-?l I ~~~z~.~ Z O ~ _~_ F -• t ~~ ~ ~ _ ~.S - & Ir`°, .. ~ii j' ~ ~ r, '~ ~, ~~ Yli~ ~ tii IJ '. " w ~~ t. ~~ 9 s 1'I g_y ~ ~~~~i i~ _;~~~ ~ !f ~, 7 ~~ 11~~'~l~~~lli~tl~rt~l~~l1'ii'~'1~1f~~i~~11i1~f~lftlii'~~~Iti~~Iti~i~fillillifl~i~~r~~11~iy~it~~tiii~lf1Ti11ii~ii~ill'f1 _ ~Iri1~~1`f1~i~i~Il~1~i11111111~f1,~" -- • ~~. ~~ f,~ APPEARANCE ~~ ~ - = REQUEST ~~ - - _ ~ _ _ _ = AGENDA ITEM NO. _ - - - - = sUBJ .~ r_ _ ~~,~~ ~ , i I would like fhe Chairman of fhe Board of recognize me during fhe public hearin o Supervisors fo = _ _ So that I may commenf.WHEN CALLED n fhe above wafter = I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADD TO THE PODIUM, _ _ RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE B RESS FOR THE - Y THE GUIDELINES = = LISTED BELOW. - _ - __ ,= • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment _ whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens s eakin o and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of he Board sue, ,= do otherwise. to _- - _ • Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their oint of ' p view onI - Lions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman, y Ques- • All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a reco n' = g ized speaker and audience members is not allowed. _ • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. - • Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or cowmen c with the clerk. is • INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED _ GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT c THEM. _= PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO DEPU TY CLERK NAME ~~ (,~ ~~ c~ r cL - - ADDRESS ~ t{ ~~2_ ~~`~~~. (~ ~~~ZL~! ~CC7t'~ ~. _ _ _ ~;:1 ~ - PHONE ~:~~ --Y - ~-~ - uninninninniinnnnnnnininiinnuuni~nuinnunnnuinnnnnnuni - iniuniuuiimiiiiiuuuiinim ACTION # ITEM NUMBER " AT A RIRGINIAMHELDNATOTHEHROANOKE COUNTY, V OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY .ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: February 28, 1989 AGENDA ITEM: Reduction of E-911 Tax .~ -~ any` COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~',`/ ~ J ~~ 1 qY f ~~ /l BACKGROUND: ted an 1985, the Board of Supervisors adop hone On Octo'oer 8, urchase of local telep ordinance levying a tax on the p telephone system. This tax service to pay for an E-911 emergencer month with the intention was imposed at the rate of 6italnandpin rit lthat wo~ld cove p the that after the initial cap At the time the 'tax would be reduced to an amou stem. recurring maintenance cosh was estimated th is tersmonth erring this ordinance was passed, roximately 26 cen p maintenance costs would be apP SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: stem will The installation of the E-911 system and the CAD sy June 30, 1989. Based upon our pressteme willacost be completed by maintenance charges for the E-91 sy recurring ear. At our current tax of 66 cents approximately $160,000 a Y 230,220 a year. Based on these we are generating $ maintenance costs, we per month, er month revenues and our anticipated recurring should be able to reduce the E-911 tax to 46 cents p effective July 1, 1989. ALTERNATIVES AND IMPACTS: Anticipated the maintenance budget. reven~es stem tw ill bel included of th Y expenditures for in the 1989-90 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: consider the Staff recommends trdinance,Board favorably adoption of the attached o Respectfully submitted, ~~~ Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance Approved by, ,~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator .~ .~" Approved Denied Received Referred To Motion by: ACTION Garrett Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers VOTE No Yes Abs f AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIAR ONLDUESDAYE FOEBROUARYCO8NT1989MINISTRATION CENTE ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 21-4 (a)~F ENHANCED EMERGENCY TELEPHONE TAX, CHAPTER 21, TAXATION, OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE REDUCING THE TAX ON PURCHASES OF LOCAL TELEPHONE SERVICE TO FUND THE E911 EMERGENCY TELEPHONE SYSTEM WHEREAS, by Ordinance 85-180 adopted on October 8, 1985, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County levied a tax on purchases of local telephone service to fund an E911 Emergency Telephone System; and WHEREAS, this ordinance imposed a tax of 66~ per month to pay for the initial capital installation and maintenance costs of the E911 system; and WHEREAS, once the initial capital and installation costs were paid this tax would be reduced to fund the recurring maintenance costs of the E911 system; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on February 28, 1989; the second reading and public hearing on this ordinance was held March 14, 1989; the appropriate legal notices having been published as required by law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervi- sors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That Section 21-4, Enhanced Emergency Telephone Tax of Chapter 21, Taxation of the Roanoke County Code is hereby amended and reenacted as follows: Sec. 21-4. Enhanced emergency telephone tax. (a) There is hereby imposed and levied by the county upon every purchaser of local telephone service a tax in the amount of s~~ty-s~~- {66$} forty-six (46~) cents per month. This tax shall be paid by the purchaser to the seller of local telephone service for the use of the county to pay tie-l~~t~al eap~tal;-~nstallat~en;-and-~ta~nter~anee-eeste-a€-its-~9~1-sy9ter~- Wl~e~- tl~e- teta~- ~n~t~al- eapltal- ar~el- ~n9tal~at~e~- ee9te- aye- panel ; tl~e-tax-ei~all-lie-~edseeel-te-twenty-s~~-{~6$}-ee~ts-peg-tnentl~-and }t- w~}}-lie- ased- exelt~s~~ely- te- pay the recurring maintenance costs of the E911 system. The county treasurer shall notify the seller of the date on which the tax is to be reduced under this section. This notification will be sent by certified mail to the registered agent of the seller sixty (60) days in advance of the date on which the tax is to be reduced. 2. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after July 1, 1989. ACTION # 8"A ITEM NUMBER -- AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: February 28, 1989 AGENDA ITEM: Ordinance accepting an offer for and authorizing the sale and conveyance of surplus real estate - well lot on Route 633, Benois Road COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: On January 25, 1989, the County received an offer from a citizen to purchase an abandoned well lot known as Wheeler Well Lot on Route 633, Benois Road, more particularly described as Tax Map No. 87.11-3-28. County staff believes it would be in the County's best interest to dispose of the abandoned well lot. Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter requires that any sale or disposition of public property be accomplished by ordinance. The first reading of the proposed ordinance was held on February 28, 1989, the second reading is scheduled for March 14, 1989. FISCAL IMPACTS: A written offer in the amount of $15,007.00 has been re- ceived from Alfred E. Wray trading as Associated Building Ser- vices of Virginia. The net proceeds from the sale of this proper- ty shall be allocated to the capital improvements funds. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Authorize the County Administrator to execute such docu- mented and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County as are necessary to accomplish the sale and conveyance of said property, all of which shall be upon form approved by the County Administra- tor. 2. Do not authorize the County Administrator to execute such documented and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County as are necessary to accomplish the sale and conveyance of said a property, all of which shall be upon form approved by the County Administrator. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the adoption of Alternative No. 1. Respectfully submitted, ~~~~~A~~~ . ~~~ Sarah A. Rice Assistant County Attorney ----------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) nnnti~n bv: No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred To Garrett Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers ~. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 28, 1989 ORDINANCE ACCEPTING AN OFFER FOR AND AUTH- ORIZING THE SALE AND CONVEYANCE OF SUR- PLUS REAL ESTATE--WELL LOT ON ROUTE 633, BENOIS ROAD BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.01 of the Charter of Roanoke County, the subject property has been de- clared to be surplus and is being made available for sale to the public; and 2. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading concerning the sale and disposition of the hereinafter-described real estate was held on February 28, 1989. A second reading on this matter was held on March 14, 1989. This real estate consists of a well lot located on Route 633, Benois Road and more particularly described as Tax Map No. 87.11-3-28; and 3. That offers having been received for the well lot located on Route 633, Benois Road, the offer of Alfred E. Wray trading as Associated Building Services of Virginia in the amount of $15,007.00 is accepted and all other offers are rejected; and 4. That all proceeds from the sale of this real estate are to be allocated to the capital reserves of the County; and 5. That the County Administrator is authorized to exe- cute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County as are necessary to accomplish the sale and conveyance of said property, all of which shall be upon form approved by the County Attorney. ACTION # ITEM NUMBER ~ ^^"',~' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: February 28, 1989 AGENDA ITEM: Authorizing the conveyance of a right-of-way and easement to Appalachian Power Company COUNTY ADMINTSTRATOR'S COMMENTS: d~~.~„z.~..~' SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: In order to complete the Starkey Sewage Pumping Station (Pro- ject 84-1-5), Appalachian Power Company (APCO) has requested that the Board of Supervisors convey a right-of-way and easement on the westerly side of Route 613, Merriman Road for the installa- tion of electrical service lines and poles. APCO will indemnify and save the County harmless against any loss or damage from its negligence in operating its facilities installed in the right-of- way and easement. Pursuant to Section 18.04 of the Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading concerning the disposition of the hereinafter- described easement was held on February 28, 1989; a second read- ing will be held on March 14, 1989. FISCAL IMPACTS: $1.00 paid to Roanoke County from APCO. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Authorize the County Administrator to execute such docu- ments and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County as are necessary to accomplish the conveyance of said property, all of which shall be upon form approved by the County Attorney. 2. Do not authorize the County Administrator to execute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County as are necessary to accomplish the conveyance of said property, all of which shall be upon form approved by the County Attorney. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: 3~-3 Staff recommends the adoption of Alternative No. 1. Respectfully submitted, Sarah A. Rice Assistant County Attorney ------------------------------------------------------------------ ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred To Garrett Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers .. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 28, 1989 ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE CONVEYANCE OF A RIGHT-OF-WAY AND EASEMENT TO APPALACHIAN POWER COMPANY BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.01 of the Charter of Roanoke County, the subject property has been de- clared to be surplus and is being made available for other public uses, i.e. utility easement; and 2. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading concerning the disposition of the subject property was held on February 28, 1989; a second reading was held on March 14, 1989; and 3. That the right-of-way and easement are located on property owned by Roanoke County in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District located on the westerly side of Route 613, Merriman Road near the new Starkey Sewage Pumping Station; and 4. That the offer of Appalachian Power Company in the amount of $1.00 is hereby accepted and all other offers are re- jected; and 5. That the proceeds from the sale of the right-of-way and easement are to be allocated to the capital reserves of Roa- noke County; and 6. That the County Administrator is authorized to exe- cute such documents and take such actions on behalf of_ Roanoke County as are necessary to accomplish the conveyance of said pro- perty, all of which shall be upon form approved by the County Attorney. ACTION # ITEM NUMBER .,..w AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: February 28, 1989 Ordinance amending and reenacting Section 21-151, Levy of tax; amount of the Roanoke County Code to provide for the taxation of food that is sold for off-premises consumption COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: f ;~ BACKGROUND: The 1988 Session of the Virginia General Assembly adopted Section 58.1-3833. This section authorized counties to levy a tax on food and beverages sold for human consumption and consumed on such premises not to exceed four (4) percent of the amount charged for such food and beverages. This legislation authorized counties within certain population brackets to adopt an ordinance implementing this tax upon a public hearing and a unanimous vote of the governing body. On May 10, 1988, the Board adopted an ordinance imposing a meals tax and on June 28, 1.988, the Board adopted certain techni- cal amendments to this ordinance to conform to the on-premises limitation imposed by Section 58.1-3833. On September 27, 1988, the Board adopted its 1989 legisla- tive program for the Virginia General Assembly. The Board's top priority issue was to seek legislation deleting the restrictive language limiting the imposition of a meals tax by counties to food and beverages "consumed on such premises." SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The 1989 session of the Virginia General Assembly adopted House Bill 1137 which amended the Roanoke County Charter. A por- tion of this legislation amended Section 2.02 of the Charter by expanding the County's taxing powers to provide for a tax on the sale of meals and food prepared on premises and sold to take out. This legislation included a emergency clause which made it effec- tive from its passage and upon signature by the Governor. ~-9 This legislation grants auth d lcollec t taxes on uthe saleuof its Charter provisions to levy a i to food prepared on premises meals and such tax shall also apP Y eneral and sold to take out • Th thank the rautho ~ity ygrant d ebY xgansive and broader in its scope law to counties pursuant to Section 58.1-3833. The proposed ordinance is sa bnance damendshand oreenacts the favorable consideration. This or ordin County' s tax on prepared fOncdlude mealsa and. foods sold ntdo ntake out ance expands remsses consumption. and for off -p The first reading of this ordinance is scheduled for Febru- the second reading and public hearing is scheduled ary 28, 1989% ublic hearing is scheduled for the 3:00 for March 14, 1989. The p al notice advertising p,m, afternoon ses ~ 11 be run Bnathe newspapers on February 28, the public hearing 1989. 1989, and March 7, It is proposed that the eff wille rovide othe Commissioner ordinance be Aprll 1, 1989. This P of the Revenue with an opportunity s amend mng o ~dinancet the busi nesses that may be affected by thi FISCAL IMPACTS: On June 28, 1988, staff estimated that tmealss consumedcofff only taxing meals on-premises and not taxinercent of the antici- premises could be as great as twenty (20) P ated revenue from the meals tax. The Commissioner of the Reve- nue concurred in this estimate. At that time the four (4 per- P ent levy was estimated to generate revenue over a twelve (12) c 200 000 and $1,500,000. month period of time between $l, , STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board favorably consider the adop- tion of the proposed ordinance. Respectfully submitted, Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney r-y Approved Denied Received Referred To Motion by: ACTION Garrett Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers VOTE No Yes Abs ~-4 AT A REGULAR MEETING OFA~HTHEOROANOKESCOUNTYSADMINISTRANOON COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD FEBRUARY 28, 1989 CENTER ON TUESDAY, ORDINANCE AMENDING AND REENACTING SECTION 21-151, LEVY OF TAX; AMOUNT OF THE ROA- NOKN pFNFOODDTHATPROS IDOLDR OR OFF- TIO PREMISES CONSUMPTION WHEREAS, by Ordinance adopted on May 10, 1988, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, added a new Article VIII, Tax on Pre ared Food and Beverages, to Chapter 21, Tax_, of the Roanoke County Code; and WHEREAS, by Ordinance adopted on June 28, 1988, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, adopted an amendment to the aforesaid ordinance limiting its applicability to food and beverages sold and consumed on the premises of a restaurant, said limitations being codified in Section 58.1-3833 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended; and WHEREAS, the 1989 Session of the Virginia General Assembly adopted House Bill 1137 which amended the Roanoke County Charter which, in part, amended Section 2.02 of said Charter to expand the County taxing powers by authorizing a tax on the sale of meals including food sold for off-premises consumption; and WHEREAS, the first reading on this ordinance was held on February 28, 1989; the second reading and public hearing on this ordinance was held on March 14, 1989. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. Section 21-151 of the Roanoke County Code is hereby amended and reenacted to read and provide as follows: ~Y Sec. 21--151. Levy of tax; amount. In addition to all other taxes and fees of any kind now or hereafter imposed by law, a tax is hereby levied and imposed on the purchaser of all foods served, sold, or delivered in the County in or from a restaurant whether prepared in such restaurant or not and whether consumed on the premises or not, or sold to take out, or prepared by a caterer. The rate of this tax shall be four (4) percent of the amount paid for such food. In the computation of this tax any fraction of one-half cent or more shall be treated as one cent. 2. That these amendments, additions, and reenactments shall be in full force and effect on and after April 1, 1989. ~~ PETITIONER: WILLIAM AND CATHERINE FORTUNE ~' `~ '~.,~ '~ CASE NCAHBER: 10-2/89 Planning Commission Hearing Date: February 7, 1989 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: February 28, 1989 A . R~UEST Petition of William and Catherine Fortune for a Use Not Provided For Permit to operate a dog and cat boarding kennel in addition to a residence on a 5.45 acre tract located at 5647 Lowland Lane in the Cave Spring Magisterial District. B. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION Don Wolthuis, attorney for George and Wanda Janosko, voiced the following concerns: use of the private road poses a danger to commercial traffic; expansion of the petitioners' existing use would constitute an illegal use of the right-of-way. C. SIGNIFICANT IMPACT FACTORS 1. Street Capacities: Current ADT for Crystal Creek Drive is 605. Lowland Lane is a private road off of Crystal Creek Drive. The road is narrow with a gravel surface and one small bridge. Concern has been expressed by the owner of the road over increased traffic; however, the petitioners will offer pick-up and delivery service as part of their kennel service. 2. Fire Protection: Outside established service standards. 3. Rescue: Outside established service standards. D. PROFFERED CONDITIONS 1. No kennels will be constructed within 25 feet of the property line. 2. There will be no more than 28 kennels built for commercial purposes, with a total of not more than 34 dog residents on the premises. 3. The kennel facility will be fenced with a eight foot fence to ensure that no dogs may escape. 4. There will be one sign, a maximum of two sq.ft. in size. 5. All dogs on this property for boarding will be on a leash or confined by a secure fence. 6. A pick-up and delivery service will be maintained for the life of the kennel. E. CONA~IISSIONER'S MOTION, VOTE AND REASON Mr. Witt moved to approve the petition with proffered conditions. The motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Robinson, Massey, Witt NAYS: Gordon, Winstead ABSENT: None F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE Messrs. Winstead and Gordon noted their concerns with unknown traffic generation and commercial traffic on the narrow private road. G. ATTACHMENTS Concept Plan (8~" x 11") Vicinity Map (8~" x 11") Staff Report Other: Terry Har 'ngton, S retary Roanoke County Planning Ca~nmission } ,~ See Mop 96.02 I' • 200' \ See MoD 9701 (• • 200' I I.SS Ac c GT ~ h~ ( • 2 1.7s'AG W\/O • ~!a ~sScD a ~~,< ra~tL L-ve-q~ ~o e~ 3.1p At Ca~vnasr~dM o/ Yipiar . : Parkway wiM IEGENO TT LINE ~ lNE --- ~. pARCEI CONTINUATION ~- UN[ ---•-~ LEOAI eLOCN N0. K IIYIT LIN[ ~--.~ lEOAI LOT N0. Q ~ ITl RIAI O1l T. PARCEL N0. EI lIN[-- __ , MA- eLOt% N0. /1 CALCVI ATED ACREAO[ DEED ACRE AO[ 17 3A(C) 17 7A(D) NORTH ` \ ~~ 86,E 96, 87)7 SCAIfD DIMENSION . v DEED DIMC NSION Y23 (!) 17l3S COORDINATC IOC. -OlITION fNFET RIDC% 2 IDENTIFICATION MAP 90.08 COUNTY • VIRGINIA ~~ SCAI[ t •• 100' _ YA- DATf _?=H_~3 '7 () 2 _`-~._~ .~ 1 -1 .---' / ~~ ~-- -~ ~~ " ~ i ~ VICINITY MAP f ,.. i~ ~~ ,~, I ~"' ~, NORTH !.N t. 1 SfO~c s« wr s9.a ~. ~ ~. w. c..•. !w Mor 97.01 ~. ~ ~~ • L>• 4 NOTE AlL PARCELS ON THIS MAP ARE ZONED RE ,UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED. 6t.u£ R~~. 110 K WttltAM ~ GAT~It:~iaE Fo~tTt)NE COMMUNITY SERVICES U'i£ No~T YEtoJ ~v~ti FoR AND DEVELOPMENT 3 96. oe - 1 - 2 STAFF RBPORT 1 ~} L, ~4-,~ CASE NUMBER: 10-2/89 PETITIONER: WILLIAM 6 CATHERINE FORTUNE REVIBWED BY: ED DETRUDE DATE: FEBROARY 7, 1989 Petition of William and Catherine Fortune for a Use Not Provided For Permit to operate a dog and cat boarding kennel in addition to a residence on a 5.45 acre tract located at 5647 Lowland Lane in the Cave Spring Magisterial District. 1. NATURE OF REQUEST a. Petitioners are requesting a Use Not Provided For Permit to construct a 20-run dog kennel with attached dog houses and cat kennel with boarding in addition to a residence, in an R-E Residential Estates District. As part of their kennel service, the petitioners would offer pick-up and delivery service. The petitioners reside on Lowland Lane, a private road that they have a right of access to and are required to assist with the maintenance of the road. The owner of the road and small bridge has expressed some concern over the liability he incurs with commercial traffic using the bridge. b. Proffered conditions ensure that no kennel will be closer than 100 feet from any property line, that there will be a maximum of 20 kennels, that the kennel facilities will be fenced, that all dogs will be kept on a leash or confined by fence and that the kennel will offer a pick-up and delivery service. c. Attached concept plan and zoning vicinity map describe the project more fully. 2. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS a. The R-E Residential Estates District permits agricultural uses, except for the commercial feeding of livestock or fowl for commercial purposes, the keeping of swine or sale of any products at retail or wholesale on premise. It also allows private kennels. b. Section 21-102-5 states tha` an application for a Use Not Provided For Permit may be ma~e to the County, "if, in any district a use is not specifically permitted." c. Site plan review will be required to ensure conformity with County regulations. 3. SITE CHARACTERISTICS a. Topography: The site is situated near the top of a large knoll. The house is located on the flat part of the site surrounded by steeped slopes that fall away from the house. b. Ground Cover: Except for a small area around the house, the site is wooded with a mix of oak and hemlock, providing a wooded border around 90$ of the site. The only opening in the wooded border faces cultivated land. 4. AREA CHARACTERISTICS a. Future Growth Priority: Situated within the Windsor Hills Community Planning Area. Designated for limited growth; does not currently have and is not intended to receive urban services in the near future. - 4 - a .:, _ e low density neral area is semi-ruraWOOdlands andusteepfslopes. b• Ge some farming, residential, act of the proposed 5• LAND USE IMPACT ASSESSMENT to the imp Rating: Rate each factor according = manageable impact, Use a scale of 1 through 5• act, 3 action. act, 2 negligible imp not applicable. 1 positive imP act, 5 severe impact, and N/A 4 disruptive imp COMMENTS RATING FACTOR rehensive Development Plan has LAND USE COMPATIBILITY 1985 Comp a land use category. The 2 a• Comprehensive Plan: ersonal service and the use is - placed this aro n S i ae r ea aurPl Villag onal services) . kennel is c ermit limited pets consistent with RV-6 (P en Low density residentialeS bandaagricultupe- 2 b, Surrounding Land: slop f fields and thedBaue Ridge Parkway ep Bordered by land. 2 c• Neighboring Area: Same as surrounding fisting dwelling and drive OS 1 r4ma a currently 3 d• Site Layout: Ex arcel 96. The _ will be done). The kennel will be located in P ei ht foot fence and existing vacant adjacent trafenced withuanof Blearing tom surrounding kennel area will be follows v e g e t a t i o n w ills torthe kennel area f romeths awprivate road. properties. Acces an old logging road. Access to the site is v N/p, e• Architecture: wooded The existing site is heavily and Landscape: that in addition 2 f• Screening neighbors. with a mix of decidscreennaheos to from surrounding to the topography, ee natural features and screening and landscaping. 2 g• Amenities: S the Except for a small area aro~Q idh ng au wooded 2 h, Natural Features: o ening in the wooded - site is wooded with afmthe site. anThe onlyk/P border around 90$ border faces cultivated land. TRAFFIC Current ADT for Crystal Creek Drive is 6The 4 i• Street Capacities: stal Creek Drive. - Lowland Lane is a private road off of Cry ow with a gravel surf ac caned ofethe road lover road is narr ressed by the o ick-up Concern has been ehowever, the petitioners will offer p increased tr Service as part of their kennel service. and delivery • n. Existing driveway provides adequate turnaroun 2 ~• Circulatio • space. UTILITIES 2 k• Water: Private water (well). 2 1• Sewer: Private septic. - 5 - i ;?~, t~ ~~ .w ~ a DRP,INAGE Must cross Back Creek to get to site; m, Basin; B eckroblemsBnoted. no drainag P lain: The property is not within the limits of the 100 n, Floodp as established by FEMA. year flood boundary 2 2 PUBLIC SERVICES o, Fire Protection: Outside established service standar s. 4 4 p, Rescue: Outside established service standards. N/A q. Parks and Recreation: N/A r. School: TAX BASE N/A Land and Improvement Value: 2 s. - Taxable Gross Sales/Year: $30,00 ox• $530 new revenue - Total Employees: 1 (owner) - Total revenue to the County/Year: APPr ENVIRONMENT 2 t, Air: for waste disposal ndardsa in norderlto oavolid 3 u, Water: Siting artment sta - must meet health dep contamination of water supplY• 2 v, Soils: Location of the kennel in the rear portion of the shbor 3 w, Noise: with the distance from neaogstduring the - in the wooded area along (600 feet) should lessen the impact of barking day. two square feet x, gignage: Petitioners have proffered one sign, 2 maximum. 6, PLAN CONSISTENCY nated as Rural Village. The kennel is considered ermit This area is desig ersonal service and the use is consistent with RV-6 P a p limited personal services). lan map and ~. STAFF EVALUATION impact on a, Strengths: ( 1 ) Conn of kennels w 11 m nimizeeanService will policies. (2) L ocatio (3) pick-up and delivery adjacent property owners. road. help minimize impact on existing knesses: (1) Access to site is via a private road and some b. Wea concern has been raised over this issue. c, proffers Suggested: None. - 6 - ~'~~ January 13, 1989 Department of Planning and Zoning P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, Virginia 24018-0798 Dear Sirs: {, ~~ lease find the attached legal description of the .acre parcel of land P sold to Bill and Cathy Fortune. which is in the process of being We understand that the Fortunes' intend to build a dog and cat boarding il~t on a portion of this land. They have our consent to utilize this fac Y land -or that purpose. Sincerely, Nick and Susan Beasley ~ . ~~.~~ ~ '~~- ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~,~, ~ `~ y ~ Q.f1 ~ ~ ~ L. Cf U-'~ "v ~~ L -io- VIRG:LNIA: BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY A _- 5.45 acre parcel of land, ) generally located at 5647 ) Lowland Lane, S.W. ) within the Cave Spring ) rn o, Magisterial District, and ) ,°~ recorded as parcel # ~ ) N 86.08,- ~- Z~~ ) in the Roanoke County Tax Records. ) FTRIDT. (lAT1FR TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY: WHEREAS, your Petitioner William E, and Catherine G. Fortune did petition the Board of County Supervisors for a "Use Not Provided For" permit for the above-referenced parcel for the purpose of development of a dog and oat boarding facility WHEREAS, after due legal notice, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing of the petition on FPhriiary ~ - 19 ~c_, at which time, all parties in interest were given an opportunity to be heard; and WHEREAS, after full consideration, the Board of County Supervisors determined that the "Use Not Provided For" permit be denied with proffers on 2/28/89. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDERID that the aforementioned parcel of land, which is contained in the Roanoke County Tax Maps as Parcel 96.08-1-2,4 and recorded in Deek Book 1072 page 522 and legally described below, be issued a "Use Not Provided FOr" permit for the purpose of development of a dog and cat boarding facility - 7 - as~af at as iron P~ loan o! samosa at ehe aorws b! the iliaabe' tt. .propsrtT pad the Maude s. pettieseN property ti op the hereinafter referraa to plats theaw Nith the., Legal Description of Property: s~ o' f;t ~ as ol~a i o ~rla~riwa~ia9tn.~ own at the angle point in sale boundary lines theaee M. 23 dogs. t7' _• 267.66 feet to as it ofpia~st~ leaving the line of the property of ~Ja~ck Nlago, S p66ud°4a' 13'~213r77 ptee~t two as iron plat thaa0e S. 11 degs. 07' 06" N. 255.21 feat to as iron Din locatd~~ 1i ~ofs~ S E. pettlcrer propartyt _ a~. 30~i~t2pS7.i175eaactru and be~lawq a~si~ Tract C as shoNp op survey Yde by Jack 6. Bass, Certifid Lang Surveyor, dated June 15, 1977, a Dopy of Nhich Ss attached to that certain ded o1 reoord is the Clerk's Offid of the Circuit Court o! the County o! Roanoke, Virginia, la Deed Book 1072, page 522. .<..m TOfi1R~ 1fITa ~ • right' of ve7owab ebyas IIewai ovewi ~ ~.~:~. remalaiag property fosmsrly lpa, property o! I,asry D. Tiptop pad Catherine Sw Tiptop. hushed and vile), and adjoining Property for the purpose of ingrsas pad egzus Pram the above described property to Sec. Rts. 897 (formerly Ru. 110. 119) which said right of Nay and easement is u sbowa oa surveys of Tracts >i pad B. BLIN3 the saw property conveyd unto the Oraator by Ded tram Larry D. Tiptop pad Catherine Sw Tipton, huabaad pad wife, dated September 28, 1979, pad recorded in the aforesaia Clerk's Offiw in Dad Book 1133, page 117. TDGL'1'~t 1iZT8 a right of wnp pad easement, more particularly described in that Deed of Euameat tzar R. Jac1[ Nlago and Marie P. Niago, husband and wife, to Larry D. Tiptop pad Catherine Sw Tipton, husband pad Nile, QateQ July 29, 1977, of record in the aforesaid Clerk's Office la Deed Book 1072, page 519. TBSS C011VEY/111CE is made subject to the public utility easement aloaq the aortbeasterly side of the above described property u shwa oa the aforesaid pLt. T1a5 CONVESCt111CS is made subject to all effective ease- a~atsY;~~rstrictiops~ pad` canditioas affectiaq the property herein Copveped. 1tIZ1fE85 TB= lOLLOItiliG SZCit17~4RE 71t>D SE;71L: ~,~..~. ~2. Gk. f~~~~ s~-L) J R. NesTt-Bu BE IT FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this order be transmitted to the Secretary of the Planning Commission and that he be directed to reflect that change on the official zoning map of Roanoke County. ADOPTED on motion of Supervisor Robers and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None ABSENT: None ~~~~ Deputy ,Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: John Willey, Director, Real Estate Assessment Terry Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning Arnold Covey, Director, Development & Inspections File - 8 - c~ 1 ~ =~ VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVI90RS OF RQANOKE COU1~fI'Y A 5.45 acre parcel of land, ) generally located at 5647 Lowland Ln.) ) PROFFER within the Cave Spring ) ~ ~ Magisterial District, and ) COT~IDITIONS ~ recorded as parcel # 96.08-1-2,4 ) N ) in the Roanoke County Tax Records. ) TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVI90RS OF RQANOKE COUDTI'Y: N z w H Z 0 U 0 H Q W O w a Being in accord with Sec. 15.1-491.1 et seq. of the Code of Virginia and Sec. 21-1O5E of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance, the Petitioner William & Catherine Fnrti,na _ hereby voluntarily proffers to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia the following conditions to the "Use Not Provided For" permit of the above-referenced parcel of land: 1) No kennels will be constructed within 25 feet of the property line. 2) The kennel facility will be fenced with an eight foot fence to ensure that no dogs may escape 3) There will be one sign a maximum of 2 square feet. 4) A1.1 dogs on the property for boarding will be on a leash or confined by a fence at all times. 5) A pick-up and deliever service will be maintaned for the life of the kennel 6) There ~oill be no more than 28 kennels built for commercial purposes with a total of not more than 34 Dog residents on the premises. Respectfully suYmitted, Petitioner - 9 - ~~ jU~1~1~r~11~~(~~~'tl~'fiii~~t~~rllf~Ii~11~1~~i~~11f1Yf~i~i'I~ltiiirri~llrtli~ii~~liliht~lirt~l~1'1`ifl~il~t~~iY~ri'~~i1til~ili~fiiyftiii11t~1111Uill~i1,~ _^~ S ®'S G~ _ ~ - _ _ APPEARANCE REQUEST _ __ _ _ - AGENDA ITEM NO. ~~ ~ ~ ~ _ _ __ SUBJECT ' cf ~~ pry v ~r ~er~~~ ~ _ -_ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so that I may comment.WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW. • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment c whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. • Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Ques- c Lions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. • All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. c • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. • Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments c „_, with the clerk. ,_ __ • INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED =_ =_ GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT .-. THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO DEPUTY CLERK 1'i'~iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii111 V V M `b~,d'r 71r0 ~rN ,Od 1 7iv3f ^7p N1 177Nf Md UtOY '001 71rN10N000 O 'ON M001• YrN - -- - ]NIl ~1f10 1riN )L• ' Op ~ ff'f 11 MOIfM7~10 0770 ' IZ 'OM 170Nr~ ' --~- 1N11 1MIl t l bINl9tilA AlNf100 3~IONtloa s I (tl tZf ~ ~ Dtrf 11 MO~fN3r110 O Ilr Of 7er7rw Dvo I tU OY 101 1pD71 oN rpo~e ire7i ----- ----- lYi~ >o.~ 8096 dVM Na trJl i ute ~e r~ (Olri /l )orlllw 071r 1ROlrJ ~:,~ MO11rf1MLL M00 1)OYr~ -- -- YI11 a~ j l lN3a Ala3toad NlYOM ON3031 ~~ ~~ ~~ .«~.,.. I ,M4, i+ r.r"..~.n~ ar a[ ax.~a,~ O • r t ~f+- ~ a >• Gt l ,002 ••I tOZ6 aOtn eeg ~toM>, ~ od ,OOZ •.1 7A 96 4oW »L PETITIONER: J. EDWARD CONNEEt ~ f~ ~„~_ ~/ CASE NUMBER: 7-2/89 ~' Planning Canmission Hearing Date: February 7, 1989 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: February 28, 19$9 A. RD~UEST Petition of J. Edward Conner to rezone an approximate 1.2 acre tract f_ran B-1 Business and R-1, Residential to B-2, Business to construct a restaurant, locates on the south side of Peters Creek Road, 280 feet west of its intersection witt South Drive in the Hollins Magisterial District. B. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION No one in opposition was present at the Planning Ca~anission Public Hearing. C. SIGNIFICANT IMPACT FACTORS 1. Comprehensive Plan: 1985 Comprehensive Development Plan has placed this area within a Transition land use category. General retail activities are discouraged with low compatibility. Unless clustered or in a planned shopping center, restaurant uses are not consistent with the land use map or with policies TR-1 (prevent haphazard commercial sprawl along major highways) and TR-2 (encourage new retail uses to locate in planned shopping centers o.r in planned groupings of independent buildings). The proposal is consistent with policies TR-8 (enhance highway frontage development with respect to minimum signage, attractive landscaping, and prominent building facades), TR-9 (provide strict screening and buffering along rear property line, adjoining residential uses), and to a limited extent, TR-7 (limit the frequency of driveway openings). D. PROFFERED CONDITIONS 1. The property will not be used for such businesses as hotels, motels, assembly halls, theaters, new car dealerships, barber/beauty shops, and flea markets. 2. The building will be a single story. 3. Restaurant will have no dance hall space. 4. No flashing signs and no portable signs. Permanent fixed signs only, limited to 80 sq.ft. 5. Lighting will be arranged so as to light only the lot of the permitted use. 6. A 10-year stormwater detention facility with a two-year release shall be constructed. ~• A maximum of three game machines will be in operation. 8. Site development shall occur in compliance with newly adopted County street and off-street parking design and specification standards. One entrance only - VA 117. 9. At a minimum, type C screening and buffering shall be implemented on eastern, western, and southern property borders. E. CONINIISSIONER'S MOTION, VOTE AND REASON Mr. Massey moved to approve the petition with proffered conditions. The motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Gordon, Robinson, Massey, Winstead, Witt NAYS: None ABSENT: None F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE None. G . ATTACHIKEI~FI'S 1~ Concept Plan (8~" x 11") Vicinity Map (8~" x 11") Staff Report , Other: `~ Terry Ha ington, ecretary Roanoke County Planning Commission ~/7 1Z • ~ E 227 ~ I ~4-~I~iN ----.-_ ~ ' E ~ .: VD, ~~~ I SToR'+l ~;.~~ DUI Vt7. ~~._ I v - IlrOO yf ~. P~'f1:R ~ .~ I. 3 ~ - ~- ~8 '~~ -- 39 r' ~~ O ~~- - ~ - ~ ;---; ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~---~ V • ~~ ~~ ~ ~ o 0 oooo~aoo CJ Cd G7 FJ D ; ~ o ~a ~ a~ SG3' ~`N ~o ~~ o~ X25 0 E~~ ~v~ _._! -r~~~ ~. _ ~ . z r~rz ~ cv~~ ~z t~~M~EQ ~~ - 2 - G~ Et `"q ... ~~ NORTH ~- .•! r / ••f ~.~ s .,, ~, ~ ZZ 23 ti ~ ' N ~ - '; ~ 9 ~ Norih~n°nt ~~ \ ~~ ~~ 24~ ~~~~1 ',,~ \ \\ O . ~ . is ie t9 t \ , \ ~ . ~ B~ \ B1 ? / ~T ~ y ,~ ~' ~ O .Rte ~" ~ ~ ~\ ' .•B~\ \ ' Nu N• w \ \ NIIi~I\ Cl~rd ~ ` ,w°V/A__ . ~~ w \ \ \ ~ ~ \ \ \ Np\\\{-~ / \ \ ~ \ 32 3i ~ ~ 81 \\ / \ \\ \~? 33' 61 B1 B~ ~aoo°~ \ ~ \-' R3 Q.t ~ ~` S 132c i { ~ ~V \ 81 . , r \ \ \ \ \ \ ~ ~ s~ \ ~s\ \ ~ \ \ \ ~ / H,6 \ ~\ \ \\ ~ \ \ a~ \ \ ,~ ° R3 \ \ \ ., ~ 4s \ \\ \ R3 ~ `` \ \ 2 R3 S~~ ,\ \ \ • \ \ \\ R3 ~ et°°~ \\ O\\\ R i \\ s.3's .•. \ \ \ \ \ "`"` \ \ A~~ PAFCCtiL~ \\ \\ \\ \ Z.ot.1E~ Y.1 Ut~1s~ ~1rlE ~hc t.1cSC~3~ COMMUNITY SERVICES AND DEVELOPMENT J. Ev~/~v ct~ rt.t~-~FL - 3 - g1 ~ iZ 1 Tv ~ 2 2"i. i3 - S - ~- ~~ ~ 30 - 3~ STAFF REPORT 4/' i ... CASE NUMBER: 7-2/89 PETITIONER: J. EDWARD CONNER REVIEWED BY: TIM BEARD DATE: FEBRUARY 7, 1989 Petition of J. Edward Conner to rezone an approximate 1.2 acre tract from B-1, Business and R-1, Residential to B-2, Business to construct a restaurant, located on the south side of Peters Creek Road, 280 ft. west of its intersection with South Drive in the Hollins Magisterial District. 1. NATURE OF REQUEST a. Conditional request to construct and operate a sandwich restaurant consisting of approximately 1,600 sq.ft., seating approximately 54 patrons and offering alcoholic beverages on premises. b. Concept flan and vicinity map describe project more fully. 2. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS a. B-2 zoning permits a wide variety of commercial and office uses. Petitioner has proffered that the property will not be used for such businesses as hotels, motels, theaters, assembly halls, new car dealerships, barber/beauty shops, and flea markets. Petitioner has also proffered that the building will be one story, will include no dance hall space, that no flashing signs shall be used (permanent fixed signs only shall be installed), and that lighting shall be arranged so as to light only the lot of the permitted use. b. VDOT commercial entrance permit required. c. Site plan review required to ensure compliance with County regulations. 3. SITE CHARACTERISTICS a. Topography: Site slopes very gently toward the south (rear) border. b. Ground Cover: Grass; existing dwelling and accessory building to be razed. 4. AREA CHARACTERISTICS a. Future Growth Priority: Situated within the Peters Creek Community Planning Area. Designated for stimulated growth; urban services available. b. General area is developed with mixed office, commercial, institutional and residential uses. 5. LAND USE IMPACT ASSESSMENT Rating: Rate each factor according to the impact of the proposed action. Use a scale of 1 through 5. 1 = positive impact, 2 = negligible impact, 3 = manageable impact, 4 = disruptive impact, 5 = severe impact, and N/A = not applicable. - 4 - RATING FACTOR 4 3 2 COMMENTS LAND USE COMPATIBILITY a. Comprehensive Plan: 1985 Comprehensive Development Plan has placed this area within a Transition land use category. General retail activities are discouraged with low compatibility. Unless clustered or in a planned shopping center, restaurant uses are not consistent with the land use map or with policies TR-1 (prevent haphazard commercial sprawl along major highways) and TR-2 (encourage new retail uses to locate in planned shopping centers or in planned groupings of independent buildings). The proposal is consistent with policies TR-8 (enhance highway frontage development with respect to minimum signage, attractive landscaping, and prominent building facades), TR-9 (provide strict screening and buffering along rear property line, adjoining residential uses), and to a limited extent, TR-7 (limit the frequency of driveway openings). b. surrounding Land: Primary highway, single and multifamily residential, institutional, office and limited retail. c. Neighboring Area: Single family residential, institutional, office and retail commercial. 2 d. Site Layout: Proposal includes one direct entrance from VA 117, - building containing approximately 1,600 sq.ft., limited signage, screening and buffering and parking to the rear of proposed structure (as sought after by Transition policies and 419 Frontage Development Plan). 2 e. Architecture: One story block or wood frame structure - anticipated. Preliminary rendering indicates solarium on west side of proposed building. 3 f. Screening and Landscape: Per ordinance. 3 g. Amenities: Proposed concept plan indicates ample parking supply. 3 h. Natural Features: Property slopes very gently southward toward - a tributary of the west fork of Carvins Creek. TRAFFIC 2 i. Street Capacities: 1986 ADT for Peters Creek Road was 18,685. Anticipated additional ADT is 321 vehicle trip ends per day. No accidents occurred in 1987 on the 0.2 mile segment of Peters Creek Road from South Drive (VA 1864) to Alpine Road (VA 1880). 3 j. Circulation: Direct access from primary highway. Single entrance depicted on concept plan is desirable. Adequate aisle width ensured by parking design and specification standards. UTILITIES 2 k. Water: Adequate source and distribution. 2 1. Sewer: Adequate treatment and transmission. DRAINAGE 2 m. Basin: Tinker Creek. - - 5 - jj 9 ~, s i YE. a~, R. 2 n. Floodplain: Area of minimal flooding indicated by FEMA flood insurance rate map. PUBLIC SERVICES 3 0. Fire Protection: Not within established service standard. According to Utility Department, proposed use does not present a greater risk of inadequate flow than uses permitted under current zoning. Hollins Fire Station is 0.2 mile northeast of petitioner's site. 2 p. Rescue: Within established service standard. N/A q. Parks and Recreation: N/A r. School: TAX BASE 2 s. - Land and Improvement Value: Approximately $266,500 - Taxable Gross Sales/Year: Not available from petitioner. - Total Employees: 10 - Total revenue to the County/Year: Approximately $3,065 from property taxes only; gross sales not available from petitioner. ENVIRONMENT 2 t. Air: 2 u. Water: 2 v. Soils: 2 w. Noise: x. Signage: See suggested proffer (4). 6. PLAN CONSISTENCY This area is designated as Transition. Restaurant uses not situated in planned shopping centers or in clustered planned developments are not consistent with the land use map or with policies TR-1 and TR-2. Proposal is consistent with policies TR-8, TR-9, and to a limited degree TR-7 (limit the frequency of driveway openings). 7. STAFF EVALUATION a. Strengths: (1) Direct access from a primary highway. (2) Concept plan adheres to sound urban design principles regarding signage, parking, landscaping, lighting and building scale. (3) Consistent with policies TR-8, TR-9 and portions of TR-7. b. Weaknesses: (1) Inconsistent with land use map and policies TR-1 and TR-2. c. Proffers Suggested: (1) Site development shall occur in compliance with newly adopted County street and off-street parking design and specification standards. (2) A 10-year stormwater detention facility with a two-year release shall be constructed. (3) At a minimum, type C screening and buffering shall be implemented on eastern, western, and southern property borders. (4) Sign square footage shall be limited to no more than 80 sq.ft. and no portable signs shall be installed. (5) No game machines shall be operated or displayed on the premises. - 6 - z~ ,., VIRQNIA: BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOI(E COUNT A 1 .2 acre parcel of land, ) generally located 6 L 0 9 P e r s ) Creek Road N.W. ) a, within the Hollins ) ~~ ORDER ~ Magisterial District, and ) 0 ~ recorded as parcel # _ 2 7. 1 3 - 5 ) N Lots 8-1 and 30 3 ) in the Roanoke County Tax Records. ) TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE C~UN'Iy: H z w z WHEREAS, your Petitioner J. Edward Conner ~ did petition the Board of County Supervisors to rezone the above-referenced parcel ~ from B-1 and R-1 ~' District to B-2 District ~ for the purpose of Constructing and Operating a Sandwich Restaurant Q w 0 a WHEREAS, after due legal notice, the Planning Commission did hold a a' heari public ~ ng of the petition on FP_ h~ „a'~, ~ , 19 ~~ at which time, all parties in interest were given an opportunity to be heard; and WHEREAS, after full consideration at the public hearing held on February 28, 19 ~, the Board of County Supervisors determined that the rezoning be approved with proffers on 2/28/89. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDERED that the aforanentioned r el l1and, which is contained in the Roanoke County Tax Maps as Parcel 2 ~ oct s ~ S 7.13- 5 22_ 26and recorded in Deek Book 2 g 9 Pa e 16 and legally described below, be rezoned from B-1 and R-1 District to B- 2 District. - 7 - Legal Description of Property: f " BEGINNING at a point on the northerly side of East Drive ~ 50~ wide ) 100 ft. easterly from the east line of Lot 11 of the R.E. Dillard Farm Map; Thence leaving East Drive and with the east line of Lots 21 and 1, N. 26 degrees 02' W, 308.69 ft. to a point on the southerly side of Virginia Highway Route No. 117; Thence with the same, N. 2O'E. 227./1 ft. to a point; Thence leaving Virginaagrees Highway Route No. 117 and with the westerly line of Lot g, S• 26 degrees 02' E. 161.50 ft, to a point on the north- erly line of Lots 25 and 26, N. 63 degrees 58' E. 50.00 ft. to a point; Thence with a line thru the center of Lot 26, S. 26 degrees 02' E. 150.00 Ft, to a point on the northerly side of East Drive; Thence with the same, S. 63 degrees 58- W. 225.00 ft. to the PLACE OF BEGINNING and being all of Lots 2 thru 8, all of Lots 22 thru 25 and the westerly one half of Lot 26, Section 1, Map of Dillard Court of record in the Clerks Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia in Plat Book 2 Page 169.~~ BE IT FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this order be transmitted to the Secretary of the Planning Commission and that he be directed to reflect that change on the official zoning map of Roanoke County. ADOPTED on motion of Supervisor Johnson following recorded vote: and upon the AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None ABSENT• •None . ~~~ Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: John Wille D' y, erector, Real Estate Assessment Terry Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning Arnold Covey, Director, Deve~o~8ment & Inspections File VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COTJN'1'Y A 1.2 acre parcel of land, ) generally located 6 /~ O g P e t e r s ) Creek Road N.W. Roanoke, Va. ) PROFFER within the H o 11 i n s ) OF rn Magisterial District, and ) CONDITIONS ~ recorded as parcel # 27.13- 5 ) 0 ~ Lots 8-14 and 30-34 > N in the Roanoke County Tax Records. ) TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY: Being in accord with Sec. 15.1-491.1 et seq. of the Code of Virginia and Sec. 21-105E of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance, the Petitioner J . Edward Conner hereby voluntarily proffers to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia the following conditions to the rezoning of the above-referenced parcel of land: 1. Property will not be used for such businesses as hotels, motels, theaters, assembly halls, new car dealerships, barber/beauty shops, and flea markets. 2. The building will be a single story. 3. Restaurant will have no dance call space. 4. ~c flashing signs and no portable signs. Perm~°~ne,~~t fixed signs onl;r, limited to 80 sq.ft. No .portable signs. 5. Lighting will be arranged so as to light only the lot of the permitted use. 6. A 10-year storm- water detention facility with a two-year release shall be constructed. 7. A maximum of three game machines will be on premises. 8. Site development shall occur in compliance with newly adopted County street and off-street parking design and specification standards. One entrance only - VA 117. 9. At a minimum, type C screening and buffering shall be implemented on eastern, western, and southern property borders. Respectfully submitted, _ ~~~ Petitioner - 9 - jj,~~~"~e$y'~~r~rluirt~r~~l~~u'~1`l~trt'r~~f~i~~~i~~~lir~~i~~i~ii~~ii~l~~'r~~rr~filtlt'r~i~~~~rr~lr~i~i~~~rr1~11Y'rr~llri~tiirl~ulirirrlflii~nlrufrily~l~1~J ~~~ - _ _ _ _ APPEAIZAN CE REQUEST _ - _ - _ - _ - _ - _ - AGENDA ITEM NO. ~ ~ ,~ _ _ - _ _ SUBJECT ~~ AIl1/~~,~ ~~' ~~'t=,~~~~~~t~ ~~~~r~ ~.i,yr _ _ _ _ = I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to = = recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter _ WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, _. _ so that I may comment I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES = LISTED BELOW. _ __ _ • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment _ whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will = decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to =_ do otherwise. =_ _ • S eskers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Ques- = p tions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. c _ • All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized c __ _ _ speaker and audience members is not allowed. =_ • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. _ _ • Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments _ c = __ with the clerk. __ _ • INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED _ = GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT _ THEM. _ PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO DEPUTY CLERK _ _ __ r = _ -- 1J - _ NAME ~..~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ f " ,~~, ~ ~r~ /~/ ~`~C~ Ilk/-° = _ - ADDRESS ~ ~~~ L~IL L % f~ i~S~~~' ,~ ~ . ~~;~' c ... "" PHONE ~ ~ ~ v ~ 7~ 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 mlillll h PETITIONER: C~l.~AI, FIDELITY BANK INC. CASE NC]~4BER: 9-2/89 Planning Commission Hearing Date: February 7, 1989 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: February 28, 1989 A. REQUEST ~` Petition of Central Fidelity Bank Inc. to rezone a 1.02 acre tract frcn- B-2 and B-3, Business to B-2, Business to construct a bank, located at 4143 Franklin Road in the Cave Spring Magisterial District. B. CI'T'IZEN PARTICIPATION No one in opposition was present at the Planning Commission Public Hearing. C. SIGNIFICANT IMPACT FACTORS 1. None. D. PROFFERED CONDITIONS 1. The site will be developed in substantial conformity to the concept plan prepared by Balzer and Associates, dated 1/9/89. The building may be oriented in a slightly different manner to improve visibility and drive-thru access. 2. Site lighting will be directed downward. Signs will not be lighted after 10 p.m. 3. Freestanding signs will be limited to 50 sq.ft. and will not exceed 20 feet in height. 4. The entrance on US 220 will be placed adjacent to the northern property line to facilitate a shared entrance between the proposed bank site and the remaining property to the north. 5. Petitioner will coordinate with Roanoke County to enable the County to upgrade the storm sewer along the eastern property line (beside US 220) prior to Central Fidelity paving an entrance onto US 220, so long as said cooperation does not delay the planned branch opening on 12/1/89. E. CONY+~IISSIONER' S MOTION, WTE AND REASON Mr. Witt moved to approve the petition with proffered conditions. The motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Gordon, Robinson, Massey, Winstead, Witt NAYS: None ABSENT: None F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE None. G . ATT'ACHMENT'S Concept Plan (8#~" x 11") Vicinity Map (8~" x 11") Staff Report Other: Terry Har 'ngto , Se etary Roanoke ounty Planning Carunission ~ r e.;~ 1. .. ~ Q. Mv~Rr (1t ~'y. • V ~~ ~ ~M Yi+~w1 I~wr S ~~ ~~ ! ~Mp /,LM30/~ 7Y+ylN?7 t ~ ~ ~ 0 ~~ .~~ ~1~ =x ~~~: 3~ i 7~:. ~ ~` \ j w 2~=~ ~~~ `_ J ~ ~ ~~~ • ' ~ ~~~ ~~ .~ , , :... ~ l ~ . .~o '; W;~ r, i d 1 ~ ~ w ~ ~ , ~ S ;'I V W ~ ~~ r ~ V ,' i~r ~ ~•~ Q 1 ~ ~ S ~ ~~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ I ~~NN ;~i o b .. ;~ tip ~ ~m r Q ,, ,, Q -~ ~~a ,,;: t ON ti~ O~ ~ Q~ , ~ ~. ~SOp~ '~ ~ . ~~ o ~OZ v~`iwC4a ~,i~ o Q2LU~~vQ~ i~ ~L_ ~. ~~~~~QSS ~~~ ~~, ~~ll, o• ~•` Ili W ~ P'+J !~ ~Ll N ~~: ~ w ~~~~ a ~ v>c~~C~O v J Q $w r .~ Y~ ~-=~ a ~w Qo .c J t a aY :~ L q o o, s~~ ~: S~Q ~~ oaso V l s - 2 - QK . • ~° r _ / ~'' ~~ ~-`~~~ g ~' (' ,_~ .~- ..L ~~.. T ,JAN(/AR1' I" 19715 .. ~....r gNl~fAT1(aN _ ,) /\/r) C'. t • -~ / o ~VICINITY MAP ;~-~ 0 ;. NORTH . ~.-r - ~~ STAFF REPORT CASE NUMBERS 9-2/89 PETITIONER: Central Fidelity Bank REVIEWED BY: Dale Castellow ~ DATE: February 7, 1989 Petition of Central Fidelity Bank Inc. to rezone a 1.02 acre tract from B-2 and B-3, Business to 8-2, Business to construct a bank, located at 4143 Franklin Road in the Cave Spring Magisterial District. 1. NATURE OF REQUEST a. This petition is a conditional request to rezone a 1.02 acre tract from B-2 and B-3, Business to B-2, General Commercial to construct a full service banking facility. Proposed facility would be approximately 3,400 square feet in size and include three drive-thru service bays and a automatic teller machine. b. Attached concept plan and zoning vicinity map describe the project more fully. 2. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS a. The B-2, General Commercial District permits a variety of commercial and office uses. Banks and financial institutions are permitted in both the B-1, Office District and the B-2, General Commercial District. b. Petitioner has proffered conditions which restrict freestanding signage to 200 square feet and not more than 20 feet in height. Petitioner has also proffered that lighting will be directed on site and that the development would occur in substantial conformity with the submitted concept plan. c. Site plan review will be required to ensure compliance with County regulations. d. Commercial entrance permit will be required from VDOT. 3. SITE CHARACTERISTICS a. Topography: Site is basically flat. b. Ground Cover: Existing car care facility, primarily asphalt. 4. AREA CHARACTERISTICS a. Future Growth Priority: Situated within the Cave Spring Community Planning Area. This area has been designated for stable growth. Urban services are available. b. General area is developed with commercial, office, industrial and residential land uses. - 4 - 5. LAND USE IMPACT ASSESSMENT Rating: Rate each factor according to the impact of the proposed action. Use a scale 1 through 5. 1 = positive impact, 2 = negligible impact, 3 manageable impact, 4 disruptive impact, 5 severe impact, and N/A = not applicable. RATING FACTOR COMMENTS LAND USE COMPATIBILITY 2 a. Comprehensive Plan: 1985 Comprehensive Development Plan has placed this area within a Transition land use category. Office, personal service and institutional land uses are encouraged in areas designated as Transition. This proposal is compatible with the applicable land use guidelines set forth in the plan. Specifically, the proposed use is consistent with policies: TR-3, Reserve frontage strips for major office facilities and TR-7, coordinate movement among adjacent sites. To some extent, the proposal conflicts with policy TR-8 which encourages prominent building facades from street view rather than parking facilities. ? b. Surrounding Land: General commercial, service, and industrial land uses. Site fronts on a najor arterial highway. 2 c. Neighboring Area: The area is developed with various general commercial, industrial, service and some single faaily residential land uses. 2 d. Site Layout: Concept plan provides for adequate interior circulation and offers only one point of access to Rt. 220. By providing for coordinated movement among adjacent sites, the concept plan is consistent with policy TR-7. N/A e. Architecture: Not Specified. 3 f. Screening and Landscaping: Sites abuts industrial and commercial land uses. Screening will be required since the proposed parking facilities are adjacent to a public right-of-way. ? g. Amenities: Concept plan denotes 23 parking stalls. Ordinance requires 17 stalls. N/A h. Natural features: TRAFFIC 3 i. Street Capacities: The site is situated on Rt. 220. In 1986, traffic surveys along this section of Route 220 revealed an ADT of 18,070. Based on ITE trip generation - 5 - ,~ fp ~. rates for banking facilities of similar size, this proposal should generate between 718 and 989 vehicle trip ends per day. Although this figure is based on 11 traffic studies, it is the staff's opinion that it is somewhat high for the Roanoke Valley. The increased traffic generated by this proposal should not have a significant impact on existing traffic patterns. Between January 1987 and February 1988, no accidents were reported along this section of Rt. 220. 3 j. Circulation: Access to the site would be gained from both Valley Avenue and Route 220. Interior circulation, including stacking space for three drive-thru facilities, is adequate. Staff recommends the petitioner proffer conditions ensuring that future access will be shared with adjoining Central Fidelity property north of this site. UTILITIES 2 k. Water: Adequate source and distribution. 3 1. Sewer: Adequate treatment and transmission. Staff recommends the petitioner proffer conditions requiring extension of existing 42 inch storm drain, located at the northeast corner of the site, to Valley Avenue, in lieu of providing storm water detention. DRAINAGE N/A s. Basin: N/A n. Floodplain: PUBLIC SERVICES 2 0. Fire Protection: Within established service standard. 2 p. Rescue: Within established service standard. N/A q. Parks and Recreation: N/A r. School: TA% BASE 1 s. - Land and Improvement Value, 570,000 - Taxable Gross Sales/Year: - Total Employees: 9 - Total new revenue to the County/Year: Unknown ENVIRONMENT N/A t. Air: N/A u. Water: - 6 N/A v. Soils, N/A w. Noise: 3 x. Signage, Petitioner has proffered conditions restricting freestanding Signage to 200 square feet with a maximum height of 20 feet. Petitioner has also proffered that signs will not be lighted after 10 p.m. 6. PLAN CONSISTENCY This area is designated as Transition on the Future Land Use Plan. Personal service, office and institutional land uses are compatible the policies set forth in the Transition land use category. 7. STAFF EVALUATION a. Strengths: (1) The proposal is consistent with the poll^ies set forth in the Comprehensive Plan. (2) Petitioner has proffered that with the exception of slight modifications to improve visibility and and drive-thru access, development would occur in substantial conformity with the submitted concept plan. (3) Petitioner has proffered that freestanding signage will be restricted to a maximum of 200 square feet and not more than 20 feet in height. b. Meaknesses, None identified by staff. c. Suggested Conditions: (1) Staff recommends the petitioner proffer conditions ensuring that future access will be shared with adjoining Central Fidelity property north of this site. (2) Staff recommends the petitioner proffer conditions requiring extension of existing 42 inch storm drain, located at the northeast corner of the site, to Valley Avenue. - 7 - =---- VIRGINIA: rn ao 0 N H z w N z O U 0 H Q w 0 a a a ._ -- v ~''. BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF RQANOKE COUNTY A 1.02 acre parcel of land, ) generally located on U.S. Route 220 ) @ Valley Street ) within the _ Cave Spring ) Magisterial District, and ) recorded as parcel # 77.20-1-40 in the Roanoke County Tax Records PROFFER OF CONDITIONS L ~ ~ `~- j Ta THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUN'T'Y: Being in accord with Sec. 15.1-491.1 et seq. of the Code of Virginia and Sec. 2I-105E of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance, the Petitioner Central Fidelity Bank Inc. hereby voluntarily proffers to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia the following conditions to the rezoning of the above-referenced parcel of land: 1) The site will be developed in substancial conformity to the concept plan prepared by Balzer and Associates, Inc. and dated January 9, 1989. The building may be oriented in a slightly different manner to improve visibility and drive-thru access. 2) Site lighting will be directed downward, and will not exceed 20 feet in height. Signs will not be lighted after 10:00 p.m. 3) Free standing signs will be limited to 50 square feet, and will not exceed 20 feet in height. 4) The entrance on U.S. Route 220 will be placed adjacent to the northern property line to facilitate a shared entrance between the proposed bank site and the remaining property to the north. 5) Central Fidelity Bank, Inc. will co-ordinate with Roanoke County to enable the County to upgrade the storm sewer along the eastern property line (beside U.S. Route 220) prior to Central Fidelity paving an entrance onto U.S. Route 220, so long as said cooperation does not delay the planned Branch opening on pe~y~ 1 ~ 1989. Respectfully submitted, -, '~ ~ ~~z~~ ~ ~'~ 10 - ~. rn w 0 N N Z w H z O U 0 Q W O a a a VIRQNIA: BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY A 0. 7 9 5 acre parcel of land, ) generally located on U.s. Route 220 ) @ Valley Street ) within the Cave Spring ) Magisterial District, and ) recorded as parcel ~ 77.20-1-40 ) ) in the Roanoke County Tax Records. ) F*runr. nuns ~ THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY: ~~` WHEREAS, your Petitioner Central Fidelity Bank, Inc. did petiti/o~n the Board of County Supervisors to rezone the above-referenced parcel ~~.Z. G~A/~2.0L GOM/n CR.4/4L AA/b from B-3 Special Commercial District to B-2 General Commercial District for the purpose of operating-a branch bank. WHEREAS, after due legal notice, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing of the petition on ~e.~~~ct.~c-~ "1 , 19 ~~ at which time, all parties in interest were given an opportunity to be heard; and WHEREAS, after full consideration at the public hearing held on 1`~r~ 4~~ Z8. 19 ~, the Board of County Supervisors determined that the rezoning be "approved with proffers on 2/28/89. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDERID that the aforementioned parcel of land, which is contained in the Roanoke County Tax Maps as Parcel 77. Zo -- (- ~O and recorded in Deek Book ~0 8 Z Page ~{S~ and legally described below, be rezoned from ~' 2 ci,,.d l3` 3~ l~uS i n12S 5 District to -l ke a- Z ~ (3us i N es S District. - 8 - Legal Description of Property: METES AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTION Subject of rezoning (1.02 acres) within Tax Map Number 77.20-1-40 BEGINNING at an existing iron pin on the westerly right-of-way of U.S. Route 220 (Franklin Road) and being the woutheast corner of the property of Cleasly St. Clair et ux (Tax Map Number 77.20-1-38), THENCE leaving said St. Clair and with said right-of-way S 18°15'00" E, 149.64' to a point, the Actual Point of BEGINNING, THENCE continuing with said right-of-way S 18°15'00" E, 154.60' to an existing iron pin at the north right-of-way intersection of Valley Street, THENCE leaving Route 220 right-of-way and with the right-of-way of Valley Street the following 4 courses: S 14°37'50" W, 42.57' to an existing iron pin, S 66°04'20" W, 103.00' to an existing iron pin, S 56°28' 33" W, 76.57' to an existing iron pin, S 42°36' 15" W, 25.19' to a point to an existing iron pin, THENCE leaving said right-of-way of Valley Street and with the west line of the subject property N 18°15'00" W, 233.03' to a point, THENCE with a line through the subject property N 71°45'00" E, 221.65' to the Actual Point of BEGINNING, containing 1.02 acres. BE IT FURTF~2 ORDERED that a copy of this order be transmitted to the Secretary of the Planning Commission and that he be directed to reflect that change on the official zoning map of Roanoke County. . ADOPTED on motion of Supervisor Robers and upon the following recorded vote: AYES; Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens NAYS: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: Supervisor Garrett ~~~ Deputy - Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: John Willey, Director, Real Estate Assessment Terry Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning Arnold Covey, Director, Development & Inspections File _ 9 _ ~. vrRClxr.A: BE~RE TIC BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF RC~AI~ICECE COUIII'Y A 1.02 acre parcel of land, ) generally locat_~d on U . S . Route 220 ) ~ ~ ~' @ Valley Street ) PROF~'~'~t within the Cave Spring ) ~ Magisterial District, and ) COI~IDIfiIONS recorded as parc~...l ~ 77.20-1-40 in the Roanoke County Tax Records TO THE E?ONCRABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOFC"c CO(~TII'Y: Being in accord with Sec. 15.1-491.1 et seq. of the Code of Virgi:u.a and Sec. 21-105E of tie Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance, t'~e Petitioner Central Fidelity Bank Inc, hereby voluntarily proffers to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia the following conditions to the reaoning of the above-referenced ~rr._l. of land: - -- - :) The site will be developed in substantial conformity to the concept plan prepared by Balzer and Associates, Inc. and dated January 9, 1989. The building may be oriented in a slightly different manner to improve visibility and drive-thru access. 2) Site lighting will be directed downward, and will not exceed 20 feet in height. Signs will not be lighted after 10:00 p.m. 3) Free standing signs will be limited to SO square feet, and will not exceed 20 feet in height. 4) The entrance on U.S. Route 220 will be placed adjacent to the northern property line to facilitate a shared entrance between the proposed bank site and the remaining property to the north. S) Central Fidelity Bank, Inc. will co-ordinate with Roanoke County to enable the County to upgrade the storm sewer along the eastern property line (beside U.S. Route 220) prior to Central Fidelity paving an entrance onto U.S. Route 220, so long as said cooperation does not delay paving the entrances prior to tfie planned Branch opening on December 1, 1989. Respec--tfully surmitted, ~~~ ~% Pet tioner ~t~itt~~i~~r~~r~~~~l~~~il~Yyltt`r'ifr~~~rl~ii~~ilrrr~iu~frfii~~r`i~f~11~Itlr~fl~~ ~~lii~Y~ti~l'~I~~lityi~~'1~~'~°~iiii~rit'r'i~ii~l't~l~i~iil~ii~iii'~i1~~ri' ~ ~ - _.. -• _,. APPEARAl~T CE RE QU. ST j p~°'~' ~~ - l = - ~' -- ~ _ = AGENDA ITEM NO. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ f~ ~~~s __ SUBJECT ~ ~ e - _ =~ I would like fhe Chairman of fhe Board of Supervisors to =_ recognize me during fhe public hearing on fhe above wafter -- so That I may comment.WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR TH = _ RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES = = LISTED BELOW. • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment __ whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, = and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. =_ • S Bakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Ques- = p tions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. =_ c • All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. _ c • Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments =_ with the clerk. =_ =_ • INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED _ GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. SE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO DEPUTY CLERK _ PLEA _-, - _ = - v~ NAME J a / - _ - __ = ADDRESS ~ ~ d ~ ~ c __ PHONE ~~3 - ~~ ~ ~ m~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ c~ ~'~ (~ PETITIONER: FEKAS HOMES INC. (S.C. ROSSI) CASE N[Av1gEEt: 48-12/88 Planning Catunission Hearing Date: February 7, 1989 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: February 24, 1989 A. R~UES`r Residential Petition of Fekas Homes In ocat~ at the northea t cornertofr theEintersection Estates to M-2, Industrial, 1 isterial District. of 16th Street and Carlisle Avenue in the Vinton Mag B. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION No one in opposition was present at the Planning C~nission Public Hearing. C, SIGNIFICANT IMPACT FACTORS rehensive Development Plan has placed this area 1. Comprehensive Plan: 1985 Camp Industrial uses such as those within a Rural Preserve land use category. tible with the permitted in the M-et fo ~~ an theuRural Prese ealand u~sP category. In land use guidelines s roved by the Board of Supervisors, staff this case, should the petition be app between the County's will initiate Bland future l~nuseoplanure consistency zoning ordinanc Site Layout: Petitioner has submitted a concept plan dated 12/16/88 2• nt scheme of the proposed expansion. As denoted on illustrating the developne roduction building on the plan, petitioner proposes to construct a second p asking and this site. This parcolc etedproducbs.utlniaddit on,etpe plan pincludes two storage of finished c additional points of access onto 16th Street. lam, interior circulation 3. Circulation: Based on the attachedanodenotep two additional points of appears to be adequate. The concept p titioner eliminate one of access onto 16th Street. Staff recommends the pe the access drives. Also, because of titioner profferlconditions limiting Avenue, staff recommends the Po Brownlee Avenue. Bob Bengtson, Roanoke industrial access for his industry City Traffic Engineer. has advised County staff that he is currently studying traffic patterns in the Riverland ~Terrac~eSubd tesiia st dy• toPdetermineathe that residents of this area nave q h traffic. As an feasibility of closing Carlisle A nded that localuigndustrial traffic use alternative, Mr. Bengtson has recomme Brownlee Avenue. Since both CarliSlthA~ereca~nens3atBStreet serve as loca residential streets, staff support D, PROFFERED CONDITIONS l• The property will be used only for concrete production, storage and relates uses. 2. The petitioner wilt substantially comply with the attached site plan. 3, Signage will be limited to 200 sq.ft. and will not exceed 20 feet in height 4. The petitioner will provide screening in accordance with the zonir. ordinance. a~~-~ E, CODM~IISSIONER' S MOTION, VOTE AND REASON rove the petition with proffered conditions. Mr. Mr. Robinson moved to app Winstead offered an amendment to thermothat t e Rural Preserve land designation is site and surrounding area to ensu will submit a appropriate. If inappropriate, the Planning Commission Secretary request to amend the land use plan fran calllvoteserve to Principal Industrial. The motion carried with the followinWinstead, Witt . .AYES: Gordon, Robinson, Masstiy, NAYS: None ABSENT: None F. DISSENTING PERSPEC`I'I~ None. G . ATTACfiMENTS Concept Plan (8~~~ x 11") Vicinity Map (8~ Staff Report ~ /' Other: ~` Terry Har gton, cretary Roanoke unty P1 nning Commission - 2 - • W U }'' 2 H .-. Q Z Z Z=tW~ ~ O U W O U 2 O G O Z Y Z~ - s¢ Z V O p= } W Z Q Q ~ ~ W -. O O LL i LL U N= Z M I~ m OZ' Gl ~' N ~ ~ V N Z ~ O ~ ~~Q o¢a N0.0 ~OV 4 4. •~ a ° ... N z ~, wc~n°a z~~ U X WN s. O 4•+ E- N Q2 ~~ ~ E- 0. U ~ ~ O a ~ CL i 4. i Q a~ Q O~ ~ O z ~' ~ N 2 G+. ~~~ _. _ ---- -- I -- - - -- --- -- W ~ i Ua 2 If ~ -~ O X .a ~ a Q ~ w c. V CCti,. D Ly ~ m E" ~~ ~ 4 ] ~ =Z' ~ ~ 0. ~ ~~~ ~ ~ I r y ~ ~ pi 0 O1 O . ~'' .~, U L ~ ~ ~. O O lli ~ R] ~ a m rn 0 ,~ m o N U L ~~ ~ ~~ w w o °~ rn r Y ro a W C!1 +~ as a~ s. cry t ca ESTbZ auit6,.,~tn ~uaaTaS 'a^H i[tu~aPufl T00Z %<08 'O'd 5ut,~aa~tc6~~3 s..ia?eM }y6t.~g _ 3 _ -. ~- D NnRru . _ 4 _ F~KAS NUM£~ ING. ROANOKE COUNTY KE ftE~ilOfiNT~b.L~.~3CA'CE~i 'fU M-Z DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT a~~ ~ STAFF REPORT ^ASE NUMBER: 48-12/88 PETITIONER: Fekas Homes Inc. REVIEWED BY: Dale Castellow ~~ DATES February 7, 1989 Petition of Fekas Homes Inc. (now S.C. Rossi) to rezone a 3.75 acre tract from RE, Residential Estates to N-2, Industrial for expansion of a concrete products operation, located at the northeast corner of the intersection of 16th Street and Carlisle Avenue in the Vinton Magisterial District. 1. NATURE OF REQUEST a. This petition is an unconditional request to rezone a vacant parcel 3.75 acres in size from RE, Residential Estates to M-2, General Industrial. This rezoning petition was originally submitted by the former owner, Fekas Homes, Inc. Recently the property was aquired by S.C. Rossi who proposes to use the site for expansion of his existing precast concrete production facility located immediately north of this site at 1410 16th Street. Mr. Rossi has expressed his desire to continue with the request as submitted by Fekas Homes, Inc. b. Attached concept plan, dated 12-16-88, and zoning vicinity map describe the project more fully. 2. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS a. The M-2, General Industrial District permits a variety of industrial uses including automobile assembly and repair, heavy equipment storage yards, laboratories, manufactur- ing, as well as those uses permitted in the M-1, Light Industrial District. The existing precast concrete production facility situated north of this site is currently zoned M-2, General Industrial. b. Site plan review will be required to ensure compliance with County regulations. c. Commercial entrance permit required. 3. SITE CHARACTERISTICS a. Topography: Site is predominately flat with a steep ridge along the rear property line. b. Ground Covers Low growing underbrush with assorted scrub trees. 4. AREA CHARACTERISTICS a. Future Growth Priority: Situated within the Vinton Community Planning Area, the development framework guide calls for stabilizing growth in this portion of the County. - 5 - C~CS ~' b. General area is developed with single family residential, industrial and recreation uses. 5. LAND USE IMPACT ASSESSMENT Rating: Rate each factor according to the impact of the proposed action. Use a scale 1 through 5. = manageable 1 = positive impact, 2 = negligible impact. 3 impact, 4 disruptive impact, 5 severe impact, and N/A = not applicable. RATING FACTOR COMMENTS LAND USE COMPATIBILITY 4 a. Comprehensive Plan: 1985 Comprehensive Development Plan has placed this area within a Rural Preserve land use category. Industrial uses such as those permitted in the M-2, General Industrial District are incompatible with the land use guidelines set forth in the Rural Preserve land rye category. In this case, should the petition be approved by the Board of Supervisors, staff will initiate a land use amendment to ensure consistency between the County's zoning ordinance and Future Land Use Plan. 3 b. Surrounding Land: The site is bordered by single family residential, industrial, and recreational land uses. The parcel immediately west of the site is vacant. 3 c. Neighboring Area: The area is developed with residential, industrial and recreational land uses. 4 d. Site Layout: Petitioner has submitted a concept plan dated 12-16-88 illustrating the development scheme of the proposed expansion. As denoted on the plan, petitioner proposes to construct a second production building on this site. This parcel would also be utilized for employee parking and storage of finished concrete products. In addition, the plan includes two additional points of access onto 16th Street. N/A e. Architecture: Not specified. 3 f. Screening and Landscaping: Attached concept plan includes screening, buffering and a 3 foot berm along the southern property boundary. The zoning ordinance would require "Type E" screening and buffering along both the the eastern and southern property lines. In addition, screen- ing would also be required along those parking facilities that abut a public right-of-way. Type E screening and buffering requires either a 35 foot buffer yard with an 8 foot screen and large evergreen trees or a 50 buffer yard with large evergreen trees supplemented with small trees and shrubs. 3 g. Amenities: The attached concept plan delineates an area reserved for employee parking, however, there is no mention of the number of employees or the proposed gross - 6 - ~~ floor or leasing area. Based on the recently adopted off- site parking and loading standards, manufacturing uses require 1 loading space for the first 5,000 square feet of gross leasing area and 1 additional space for every 30,000 square feet thereafter. The ordinance also requires 1 parking space per employee on the major shift, plus 1 space per company vehicle or piece of equipment. 3 h. Natural features: The site is basically flat. At this time staff is uncertain as to how much, if any, grading might be necessary. TRAFFIC 3 i. Street Capacities: In 1988, the City of Roanoke Department of Engineering surveyed traffic volumes on both Carlisle Avenue and 16th Street. These counts revealed an ADT of approximately 1,000 for Carlisle Avenue and an ADT of 640 for 16th Street. Based on ITE's trip generation estimates, heavy industrial uses generate approximately two vehicle trip ends per employee. It is the staff's opinion this figure is not appropriate for this proposal since the petitioner makes regular deliveries of concrete products. Petitioner advises the proposed expansion would generate minimal traffic. 4 j. Circulation: Based on the attached concept plan, interior circulation apprears to be adequate. The concept plan denotes two additional points of access to 16th Street. Staff recommends the petitioner eliminate one of the access drives. Also, because of traffic (truck) volumes along Carlisle Avenue, staff recommends the petitioner proffer conditions limiting industrial access for his industry to Brownlee Avenue. Mr. Bob Bengtson, Roanoke City Traffic Engineer, has advised county staff that he is currently studying traffic patterns in the Riverland Terrace subdivision. Mr. Bengtson stated that residents of this area have requested a study to determine the feasibility of closing Carlisle Avenue to through traffic. As an alternative, Mr. Bengtson has recommended that local industrial traffic use Brownlee Avenue. Since both Carlisle Avenue and 16th Street serve as local residential streets, staff supports this recommendation. UTILITIES 2 k. Water: The County Utility Department advises that water is available to this site from public water main situated in the City of Roanoke. 2 1. Sewer: The County Utility Department advises that sewer is available to this from a public main located in the City of Roanoke. - 7 - a~-~ DRAINAGE ri/A m. Basin: N/A n. Floodplain: PUBLIC SERVICES 2 0. Fire Protection: Within established service standard. 2 p. Rescue: Within established service standard. N/A q. Parks and Recreation: N/A r. School: TA% BASE s. - Land and Improvement Value: Not Provided - Taxable Gross Sales/Year: - Total Employees: - Total revenue to the County/Year: Unknown ENVIRONMENT 3 t. Air: Due to the proximity of the proposed site and the adjacent residential and recreation land uses, staff recommends the petitioner take every precaution to reduce the amount of dust or other pollutants emitted from the site. N/A u. Water: N/A v. Soils: 3 w. Noise: Staff suggests the petitioner take the appropriate steps necessary to reduce the amount of industrial noise emitted from the site. 3 x. Signage: Attached concept plan does not include any indication of proposed signage. Staff recommends the petitioner proffer that no additional will erected on site. This proffer should include a prohibition of temporary and portable signs as well. 6. PLAN CONSISTENCY This area is designated as Rural Preserve on the County's Fu*_ure Land Use map. Industrial uses such as those permitted in the M-2, General Industrial District are inconsistent with the land use policies and guidelines relating to areas designated as Rural Preserve. 7. STAFF EVALUATION a. Strengths: Proposed site offers an existing Roanoke County - 8 - cam? ~' % " {~ industry an opportunity to conveniently expand its present operations. (2) Proposal would have a positive impact on the tax base. b. i~Ieaknesses~ (1) The proposal is inconsistent with the land use policies and guidelines relating to areas designated as Rural Preserve. (2) The proposal is likely to increase truck traffic along Carlisle Avenue which is primarily a local residential street. (3) Petitioner has not proffered any conditions that ensure the site will be used as illustrated on the submitted concept plan. c. Suggested Proffers: (1) Staff recommends the petitioner proffer conditions restricting use of the site to a precast concrete production facility. (2) Staff recommends the petitioner proffer conditions prohibiting any additional signage on the site, including portable or temporary signs. (3) Staff recommends the petitioner proffer conditions ensuring that industrial access wiles be gained from Brownlee Avenue rather than Carlisle Avenue. (4) Staff recommends the petitioner proffer that only one additional point of access will be constructed on the site. - 9 - d„~~M Mr. Dale Castellow Roanoke County Zoning Administrator P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, Va. 24018 Dear Mr. Castellow: .lf~h~~, ~, This is to confirm your conversation with Mr. Richard Willet concerning zoning on property located on 16th Street, formerly owned by Fekas Homes, Inc. (see attached plot) Please be advised that this property was purchased by Stephen C. & Beth Ann Rossi December 29, 1988 and it is our desire and request to continue with the rezoning originally filed by Fekas Homes, Inc. Should you have any question, please advise. Beth Ann Rossi January 26, 1989 173 Silverbirch Drive Blue Ridge, Via. 24060 -, - 13 - G VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUN'T'Y A 3 .7 4 acre parcel of land, ) generally located adjoining ) ~ Riverland Terrace ) o within the Vinton ) ~~ ORDER ~ Magisterial District, and ) N recorded as parcel # 7 0.11-1- 2 2 ) and 70.11-1-21 ) in the Roanoke County Tax Records. ) N w TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY: Ei z o husband U WHEREAS, your Petitioner Stephen C. Rossi and Beth Ann Rossi, off ~ d w,i~e, formerly Fekas omes,, nc., dic~ petition the Board of County Supervisors to rezone the above-referenced parcel ~ from RE, Residential District to M2, Manufacturing District Q for the purpose of manufacturing use w 0 a a a '~ WHEREAS, after due legal notice, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing of the petition on January 7 lg 8 9 , at which time, all parties in interest were given an opportunity to be heard; and WHEREAS, after full consideration at the public hearing held on February 28 , 19 89, the Board of County Supervisors determined that the rezoning be approved with proffers on 2/28/89. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDERED that the aforementioned parce170 llnd,-2whlich is contained in the Roanoke County Tax Maps as Parce170.11-1-22 & and recorded in Deek Book ~0 3 I Page 57 ~ and legally described below, be rezoned from RE, Residential District to M2, Manufacturing District. - 10 - ,:f-~ ~" , ~~ ~ , a Legal Description of Property: Containing 3.74 acres, fronting on 16th Street, S. E., adjoining property of Jack St. Clair, Inc. and Riverland Terrace SubdlVlSlOri BEGINNING at an iron p:.n on the south side of Carlisle Avenue at :-t~ easterly tsrwtinus, said point being on tie Roanoke City-Roanoke Co~iity Corporate Lins and being a point c~ the line of Lot _1~ Riverside terrace recorded in the Clerk's Offi:s of the Circuit Court of :hs City of Roanoke in Nap Book 1, Page 2:~3; thence leaving said Point of Beginning and crossing Carlisle Avsr.us, than following the easterly aids of an 11 fort alley, N. 33• 41' E. 403.24 feet to an old icon pin on the seat side of 16th Strsst, and corner to the 4 p~operty presently owned by Stsphsn C. i Bsth Ann Rossi: thence with i the Rossi line and the F,topsrty herein described, 5. 56• 19' E. ' :r.4.Ol feet to an old icon pin on the lint of the William P. Vinyard ~ Est•.tss thence vith the Vinyard Estate, 5. 31•;48' :~' W• 455.99 feet to ~n icon pin on the lips :f Lot 6 of RivecaiAs Terrace; thence with ~~ ~ tbs rear line of Riverside 'fsrrace Subdivisicr. a.nd the Corporate Lins between Roanoke City and Foanoks County, N. 48. 25' 45"._N• 382.55 feet to the ?lace of 8EGINN?:NG and Dsing a paced of land containing L 3.658 acres and being as sown on Boundary Survey for Stsphsn C. i Beth Ann Rossi by T. P. Parker i Son, Engineers and Surveyors, Ltd. dated Dscsobsr 28, 1988, a ~~apy o* whir:: is at!ached hereto and made a part hereof. DEED ~Q.,QQ In IM Caark's OMks d lM prcult Oour~,b- ~+ ~y^b _ Sbta Tax d this povntyTax ti ~Oa d Rwnoks. Va., thiB~day ~ the cartMkBta d Tnutsh-y++ Z; /. da instnanent was pressnbd, and • . ~•a ~ a /s ~+? achnowlsd ~~nt~ thereto nr'exed, aOmRtad to 038Stata i~~ retard aLL~'dod~ ~. The taxes imposed 220 Local ~ by Par. 58.18018 $~t d1 tlw+ haw bean ToW f~,~CY~ •~_ taatr a~. w~. ~ .. .~ i ie- ~ MIhY1 BE IT FURTHER ORDERID that a Dopy of this order be transmitted to the Secretary of the Planning Catmission and that he be directed to reflect that change on the official zoning map of Roanoke County. ADOPTED on motion of Supervisor McGraw and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Garrett NAYS: Supervisor Nickens ~~~ None ~~~~ 1~ ~ ~~~~ Deputy r Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: John Willey, Director, Real Estate Assessment Terry Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning Arnold Covey, Director, Development & Inspections File - 11 - .., rn 0 N VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY 3.74 A acre parcel of land, ) generally located adjoining ) Riverland Terrace ) within the Vinton Magisterial District, and 70.11-1-22 recorded as parcel # and 70.11-1-21 PROFFER OF rnrmTmTnNS ?~~ in the Roanoke County Tax Records. TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY: Being in accord with Sec. 15.1-491.1 et seq. of the Code of Virginia and Sec. 21-105E of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance, the Petitioner Stephen C. Rossi and Beth Ann Rossi (current owners) hereby voluntarily proffers to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia the following conditions to the rezoning of the above-referenced parcel of land: (1) The property will be used only for concrete production, storage and related uses; (2) The Petitioner will substantially comply with the attached site plan; (3) The Petitioner will provide screening in accordance with the existing Zoning Ordinance; (4) Petitioner will not use signage exceeding 2.00 square feet or exceeding 20 feet in height. Respectfully submitted, STEPHEN C. P.OS and BETH ANN ROSSI (fo y as omes, Inc. ) Petitioner - by their attorney - 12 - ,r~- -~~o m Fri, `~e5-c.~~.n'h d. C~~ ~~ ~-c~.~;a..~, ~~er.,~e~ ~c~ re~nr a 3,~5 Gtcre -~rac~' ~~~c~cS `ID (Y'~e1 ~~u5fYb0~ ~r `~~~ ~~~1,t0h c3~d. t)EAtt COUNTY BCARD OF SUPERVISCK: I AM A RES IDENT t~sF THE NIJRTHEAST C~Ri~;ER OF 16TH ST AND GORDCN AVE. [ C NDI. THINK THAT THE EXPANSIfN OF THE CONCRETE PRODUCTS PLANT WOULD r3E FEASiC3LE CR SENSIBLE FC'k SEVERAL REASONS- C IRS*, T€iE PLANT WILL NOT ;3E INCREASIrJt~ ~a~JY EMPLGYMERT CPPCRTUNITIES AS ;r~. F2L'SSi SpIC C;N Tt1tSUAY, FEt)t~uARY !, ii$9. SECOND, MY WIFE AND I Nl~J4~ PURCHASED A Hf.,ME iN THIS VICINITY AND I AM AFRAID THAT THE VAL:JE ,JF OUR HG~USES WILL i~ECREASE. I A?1 TRYING TG MOVE LP I~ THIS WORLD AND [ ~JEF INETELY CO NOT WANT 7'0 TAKE A LOSS OR HAVE TO PAY TC SELL MY HOUSE. II" I DaU HAVE TO SELL MY HCUSE FCR A LOSS: I WOULD DEfIAETELY THINK Ti~ICE BEFORE BUYING A HOME IN 7HE COUNTY OR [iU.ILDIi1G A HCUSE IN THE CCi_~!vTYI ESPECIALLY IF THE COUNTY CGNSIDt2S PROFIT ANO WEALTH FROM T:YES ~4GRE IMPt7RTAfvT THAT THE LIVES OF PEOPLE IN AFFLICTED AREAS. Th'~ J HIRC REASCaN 13 THE TRAFFIC. I WOULD BE AFRAID CF STARTING A FAMILY [!ti THIS AREA BECAUSE CF THE TRAFFIC FRtJM BIG TRUCKS. ONE CF THE ROUTES TH.aT IS SUGGESTED GGES HY A FARK WHERC LITTLE CHILCREN WILL BE PLAYING. FOk t~XAMPLE, LI TTLE CHILDREN rJTLL f~E PLAYING IN 7HE PARK ARD THROWING SALLS At\C 1. BALL RCLiS INTO Th,E ROAt;. WHAT DOES A CHILD DC? HE RUNS AFIE} -THE BALL A"JD GETS HIT BY CAE CF THESE TRUCKS. ThE CCNPANY MAY TRY Tfi' :=AY THEY AR.E SORRY; CiUT, S(?~'[.Y DO'^S NOT BRING BACK An INNOCENT CI-ILD. C.HILCREI'S SAFETY IS QNE i)F THE tiiAIN CONCERNS OF ALL THE PEOPLE I~, ~~al S t',OMNI,PI ~ Y. ~ITh! THIS KIND [aF SI TUATIUN I S i T SAFE TG LET OLR CHI t.DREN PLAY +i1Yk~i RE At,C NOT t;ET HURT? !'LEASE HERE US ANO VOTE NO TO THE EXPANSIGN GF trlR. RGSSI' S PETI fICN TO REZOnE Ah ALREADY RESICENTIAL LAND ZONE TO AN INDUSTP. IAL ZONE F'i.~R THE FXPAhSIUN iTF HIS CONCRETE PRODUCTS PLANT. HflNESTLY, WOULD YCU WANT YOIfR CHtLC TD LIVE OR PLAY IN AN AREA jUt,H Aj ti1S, wtitN YUU i1AVE :riti IMUI:H 1Ni~UJT}t1AL THINGS t1~IfY~,: liN• EVERYt;AY, THERE I5 MORE POTENTIAL HAZARD FOR CHILDREI+'S SAFETY THE LONGER This KEFFS GC[~3G Ctv. T}tANK, YCU FOR LI S~IENING. PLEASE VOTE NC. ~~, ~ ~~~~ T~-~r~As Es~wa~D ac:a[3ITT ~~.~ ~; c~iC=.~f~ aEAR tTCARD c+F SiFER1.I=_cF, L~ AFE ~iE, THE PEOPLE CF THE SCI.THEAST AREA CF A CCnCFETE FETIT:ICn, WRITING TFiS LETTER EfCAUSf hE ARE CONCERNED A2C1LT A PETITICIn CF FEKAS HONES TC RE:2CNE A 3.75 ACRE 1FACT FROM RE, RES ICEnT IAL EST A7 ES 7Cl i~- ~ INDUSTRIAL FCC FXGFNT}~OfNINTERSECTii7iV DFCD1ETHcS1FAnGTCAFLISLETAVENLEIFE NCRTt-E:AST CCF E In THE ~IPTCn MAGISTERIAL CitTFICT. WE GPPCSE THIS PETITION EIECALSE FE ARE CCTCEFnEC AECUT SEVEF~L FACTORS il`7VCLVEC WIT 1- TFIS EXPA1~SiC~N. 11 DEPRECIATICn CF t-C1SInG - WE ARE CCPCEFnEC Tt-1T IF Ts•IS EXPANSICIN TAKES PLACE CLR HCLSES I"iLL CEfRECIATE In vALUE. Tt-:IS TYfE GF EXPANSION kJLLC nIOT t3ENEFIT LS, 1317 HARM THE 4ALLE CF CUR iPLESThEnTS. ME NAY nCT fVfP PE lELE TC G3VE C3iR: HC3URSES A~Ay hHEn IT COMES 1IhE TC SELL. 2) TRAFFIC FLOW - WIT)- TI-IS EXpANSIC7lt WE ARE ALSO CCnCEFnFC AEC3LT THE TRAFFIC FlCin FRCN TRUCKS AnC CTFEF fLSINESS EQUIPMENT. ONE C)F TI-E SLGGESTEa RCLTES IS CAFLISLE AVE. Ana lETF STREET. Wf I-AVE FOLSES TO THE LEFT Anc FIGH1 CF TH1r STREET Anc ALSO A FAFK to TF-E LEFT Siff, ]nCFEASED TRAFFIC. FLCI~r FROM aIESEI T4tLCKS, ETC. CGLLD CnIY EE E-AIARCCUS APC nC CI WANTS TRUCKS CARRYING CEMENT CLST AND ROCKS CChInG 81 THEiR HOUSES, SInCE IT wCULC InCFEASE TRAFFIC FLOW, hE W~LIa BE AFRAiD TC HAVE GIR CF-ILCREn FLAY I1~ ThE FQRKtAt ShALI AS iT iS TFIS EXPAnSICn wOULC NEVERiEE~EFALREACYnFA1~E EnCIJG}-FTiZAFFICCLL CnLY CAMACE CUR LIFESTYLES C!~ THESE STREETS APD 1-E COP'1 nEEC AnYACFE. 3) nCISE FCLLUT 1CN - AFTER TALK ING ~+iTH A PER tCP fhPLCYEC vl iH RCAnCKE CCUnTY AChIPISTFATICn ANC REACINC TFE FILES CN THIS ZCNInG, IT SEEMS TC LS ;HAT Tt-ERE I»CLLt EE CAIvACinC I'CiSE PGLIUTICP, ALSO. THIS CCIFIPANY 4,ANTS TC E}FAn~ ~1TH GFinCin MAC:HInES ARC CT1=ER nCiSY EGUIPMEnT, SC T#~E COMPANY CAn PItCCEcc ALL MATERIALS In CnE FL ACE, 1"lTt- lt-IS GFInCInC AnC CTF-EF nC7S iNVCLVEC, TFERE IS NC ~;AY ME Ct]ULD E9EnEF IT. ALSO. tiCN f+CLLC TIrE FECPIE )nhC WORK nlGt-T St-IFTS EE A£Lf TC SLEEP k17H THIS NGI SE aLRING CAYTIME HCL'RS ALL CF TI-E IIhE. 4+f EP.lCY CUF PEACEFUL NE 1CI~BORHGCD THC hAY I T I S hI THCLT 1RlCK `. AnC nCI SE ECTI•ERInG iS. TEE 3 FCCT MUC WALL TI-AT MCLLC SL~'Z~OLnC TFE PLANT hOLLa nCT 8E EPCLGH TC RECUCE nCiSE CAhACE TC n!-ERE YCU CCULNC'T !-EAR IT AT ALL. 4) AIR FCLLLTitn - WIT!- nCISE PCLLUTIGN kE AkE AL SG CCNCEKnED A~?C AIR PQLILTICN. SInCE ALL NAnUFACTURInG t~tLLC EE CCNf iN UnE PLACE, TtE POTENTIAL CF CEMENT DUST AnC AIR FCLLL1:ICn IS InE1~ICAELE. T)-E OUST WCULC CCVEF CUR FC;LSES ANC CAF2S, At~~; -~Cl NOT 8E HE:ALTNFLL TC EREATHE, ALSO, TEE TFU(KS CAFYY lnG CE~EN1 CLST IS BCINC TC LEAyE RESICUE EVERI~i,}~ERE. >>3 CYc~CFE - hE MdKE TF IS A}iEpL pELdUSE t•E ALREA.C1 NAVE EhGI.GH ~t~;InESS In (°lR ARE/'. MF CAf~' T ST EF CUTS ICE W iThCt;T LOOKING .~T SOME SGR1 OF Bt,EI~E:SS. THIS IE 4 RESICE~TI~I AREL ABC Mt Ef`JCY lltilt~C t~hEFE wE CC. Ths`_+ E1<F~h4ICn M~°t NOT BE i~;AZAf:CCIS IF THERE ~FRt- ^C FESICF..1~T1~'l hCNESs dhC IF IT WERE I~' ICTIY INCISTRIsL- T3C1, SInCE RE OC NRVE hCMES AnC LIVE hEFEr hr ARE CEFIRI7ELY CC {`CEF~EC l18C'JT ThE hEd'LTf, VALI:E CF CLR TnVESTh TS, Ano THT. tElrePE CF CeJE CChNt;hlTY. IT wGULCN'T FE F~[; TtE PFGPI€- Cy ;NIA t;ChhlPiT1 TC lET 1l-It E)F4lj.ct~ rr.KF FI.~CE. ~hE Sii"~vdCE o~15+^ nEECS TC EiE PCI~TEL Oll. '~T(F T(' AC~E~TISC n ?l5It,E`::, '"_T 7C dllCw ThIS FEFSCN TO PITT IEXZC DICE, `~'; T.,~ ,t.~<Tns~y ~3ak:n ~F E+r~G T( ICCk 1'i IT IS n[T F~ €... !~~ d ~~. dT TFE FEERUARY 7 <T}:r AS YCl Cd'~ kEd'Cr h{. nFE f-F{. CTIY CC~CEF~EI. ~i~FT It~f, iF~IS P(:TTTIUN T,pc +'a"EO r~tlht AFFRC~dI FY 1hE Fldt~nlt`G CC"t"I ~SIC~. r:E C[n~T T~ECEt~! h1Tt-~IL~CFEELiEVEnTFtTCTtEPE~WILL PEEMphY NE"T xrta ~F+n~ Mt t-n~E t~E. i1C{`' 1 SEE 4-Ck YCU C~~ {-+A~~.+~Ft;t a~-TE!~-EFT'FCiC FRCN lht < f ~flA~SIC~. lE? ThtS TXFAf~SjCh TIKE ~lA(E• "'E SAVE TT~KE~fEECTCEMfURECCRCORNS~CFS, ~Cf_{~E FL `F Ch THE PCdRC h~S TC. FIEASE, ~;hfl ~A-~TS TC OC Tt_. ~ PARK dnC HAVE BISInE<<ES ALL IFCI,i~C tilTt~ nC SCCr~f~Y T( ICCK AT. IT IS RE~'LlY SAC:PLEASE CCh'1 MCf~cEf+ C'lR CC~"~~,til T~ tyI `; Fa YCIF i.ECISdC.T • ~HETv r~YiNG TC FInC Clri IFcQnY InFPRGPERII CM~ERSTMERE ~CTIFIEC~C TF jr NcTTER, r-E wEFE TCLC TfdT _EVERAL rNI ~ OCCS-~' T REdIIY CCHACFQFE^Sj,CTIFIEC`1HSti 4Cl.lC l~t~EECPPCSEGCIT00Q OF Fa!+IIFS. I~ CRE GI~'F(T1Y. {iCLCM AHE SICnEC SICnATURFS Cf FECPLE i~ ThiS nEICj-BQRNCG[l WHO UPP~'~E IhIS C~PARttth. ?' =RCC We ;~AKf T!-IS ra~F^1 r fC'•F `+0 ",. TC LI'~lEA AE yCl. h!EAR IHE ~¢~%.: [rQIF~ CF ~ETE`'F pF_tFIE. ThAhK YCI, SINE ERELY, ~ ;;~, y,~,C.~,r -l~~'=~' _, f , ~~ i( ~ ~~,~ ` .~. ~- <~ ;- %~~ ~ a I L_'.. G ~' ...~:.su ~... ,. r,'~. t ~ (:c `~~ ~ ~~~ ~.^~ ,/F / ~ ~ 1 :~ ~~~ ~~aCw !-~. ~.._ Vim` ~`-~ 'r / ~` . f, r ~-~ ', i' ~~, ,,,~, ~-~Ic._ ,/ r ~. 7 1 ~ R ~ 4^ `} !Z'L~~(~ti ~~ ~htia~'~' k 'Jn ~ l ~F ~ ~ ~1 W k x~ -~ K" rt~ -?P "ka~ ~~_ ~~ Y r ~1 ~ j~ T I ~ r~ ~. ~ ~„ ; ,..> ~~~..~~ .. ,r~,.~ r_ ~~ ~~~ ~ jt'~y/ r ,~/~" ~ ~~ r /~~J/"/j,/y~~ ~ f ~ / / t ~ ~ ti?F r ~ r a p ~ ~ ~ .~ t4,ifr'ta n .. - f+~f^}+~~~~J./~_y~~~/ ~ t 1 N /' ~/ l r t~"1 ~' a /~ s ~~~ ~ ~ s~"~, 7{ ` c ~1 `tea .~ ~~~ 7~~ J~2~~.~c ,~'`--f~/~ ~~~~ ~ , ,~ .4 " ~a, ~ ~ y ~ ' / ~ i _ b ~ LL' ~ ~, ~a } mar/ '" ~ -y ~~_, y ~~j}~1 .- ~~~~ ~~ ~_ rti _ ~' ` Y~/1 n ` ~M. ` ~~I ~ ~~7~+" Vi~t./ • '.1~~ ~:~ :^V d Yom' y TC ~~'. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~: ''~ , / I ~ ~ ~' p~ ~d,~~dN`~ ~ UC l~.d,~!5l'4lc,C.~ llr~- ;~ ~ `' tt`}ra. ~ /j112,~ ~:/?'1'?~; ~,c_ 1~`~.- 1 t~~ J ~(?~~r,~f'f-~1 ~~.~ .~. ~ f ?~~t~~'~.~~~y h,.MY''. V G - ~ ~~ ~ ,.; r:.- r$.. ~~~ ,.- ~ ~.,~ t~ GG~Ex ~YtaU~ ~ C ~~ ~'2~ ~~=, "~ _. ~. _. _ _ ~ .tom , ; -_ :- - F 4~~F t: ' ~?~~~.' .j ,~ , _,_. _. .u ljj~tii~t~iili~rif~~l"~~~il1~i~~tlYit~~t`ri~yi~~~~~1y~l~iilutiitiii~i~i~~ilii~`ii~i~iil~ri~f~~11iift1'i~~'lliilff'1'i~li~~1'I~~~iflll~f'iififl~rl~i~i1~1'ii~ljjj APPEARANCE IZ.E QUE ST _ - _ - __ _ - AGENDA ITEM NO. ~ ~~~~~~ _ - _ _ _ ~ r. __ _ SUBJECT ~ _ ~,~ ;~~ _. ~ ~, ;.., _ -~ 1 f £ 4 / I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter _- so that I may comment.WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, _ I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE - RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES - LISTED BELOW. _ • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. • Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Ques- =_ bons of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. • All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized =_ speaker and audience members is not allowed. _ • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. • Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments _ with the clerk. c • INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED = GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION __ FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. . _ PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO DEPUTY CLERK NAME A ° ~. ~ a ~ ; ADDRESS ~ ~%` ~a- ~ a.~. PHONE c m~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~tifi'iillitl~i~il(ltl'111111i`iII1111iIIlil°I~iIlli1ii111.l-1111i11iTi~fiiltYil(iti'ii11Ci"IIy'1'I~f1"1'liifiiilllifllflltfli1"il'lilllllllllf liljL. _ ~ ~ _ .,,,. - _ _' - - _ UEST - - APPEARANCE RE Q - _ - - _ - - _ ~ ~~-~, _ __ __ - AGENDA ITEM NO. "~ - -_ SUB ECT ~~a. - {~~ Y-~ ~~ ~ ~ lr r~ , = I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to - _ _ recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter _ WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, -- so that I may comment. _ __ I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FORTH _ _ RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES - - _ _ LISTED BELOW. • Each s esker will be given between three to five minutes to comment = P __ whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will _ decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, _ and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. - • S eskers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Ques- = P = = tions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. • All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. __ c • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. • Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. c • INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED ; GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. .. _ PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO DEPUTY CLERK ~- = NAME J~' i~t 1~1 i~ ; (~I-~~~~ c ~~ i 11,, - ~ t r~.(1G t-~' _; ADDRESS ~ ~~ C~ ~ % >> ~ C. r ~ "1 ~~ ~ ~ PHONE ~~ ~` C ~~ mlillllllllllliiiillllllllliliiillllllllllilillllllllllllllillillllllillllllllillllllllllllllllllllilllllllliiillilllllllllllllll ~~"~ jj~i'l~i!'~itli~i~~1~'~i1i11`ltiYrii'i'l~irii`Illi~liil`11i1i~~i~iiilltt~fii~(tl~~'f~i~~i~ili~t~`~ii1~~~(i1t`Ii1~i~liliIt11it1i11~lili~f1Y~~~1~ll~ll~iit'll~jj __ _ _. APPEAR.~-.NCE REQUEST _ - _ - _ - _ _ _ - _ AGENDA ITEM NO. ~"` _ _ - - - _ ~ _~ - _ - _ SUBJECT ~e ~ j _ - _ _ = I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to = __ - reco nine me during the public hearing on the above matter • so that I may comment.WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, _ I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FORTH _ RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES = LISTED BELOW. =_ • Each s Baker will be given between three to five minutes to comment P -_ whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will _ "' decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to =_ do otherwise. - • S Bakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Ques- = p tions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. • All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. _ • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. • Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments ; = with the clerk. • • INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED ; = GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT c THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO DEPUTY CLERK __ NAME ~':~~ .., ~'' ._ ._ _ ADDRESS .. r"~ -" PHONE milllllllllllllllllillllllllilllllllllllllllilllllllillllilllllillllillilllllllllllllllllllllllllilllilllillllllllllllllllllll C.s ~'~ rl PETITIONER: WILLIAM MAAS CASE NUMBER: 6-2/89 Planning Commission Hearing Date: February 7, 1989 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: February 28, 1989 A. REQUEST Petition of William Maas to amend the proffered conditions dated Nov. 17, 1987 or a 0.5u acre tract to construct, assemble and sell wooden playground equipment, located at 3639 Brambleton Ave. in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District. B. CITIZEN PARTICIPA'T'ION No one in opposition was present at the Planning Commission Public Hearing. C. SIGNIFICANT IMPACT FACTORS 1. Comprehensive Plan: 1985 Comprehensive Development Plan has placc~l this area within a Core land use category. The proposed use is not an encouraged lane use type but does conform to policy C-2 (access to an arterial), policy C-~ (coordinated site design-shared vehicular access), and can conform to poli o C-5 (effective screening and buffering>. 2. Circulation: No effect on circulation to/from Brambleton Avenue. If 1C employees are on the site, parking will be a problem. If approved, parkinc alternatives can be evaluated at the site plan stage to determine zoninc_ ordinance conformance. D. PROFFERED CONDITIONS 1. No business hours after 9 p.m. 2. No outside storage of excess lumber of any kind. 3. No large truck delivery (i.e. s~ni-trucks). 4. Doors will be shut when saws are in progress. 5. Outside display area will be in respectable condition at all time. 6. No freestanding signage shall be permitted for this use. 7. The property shall only be used for the manufacture and incidental sale of wooden playground equipment. E. COMMISSIONER'S MOTION, VOTE AND REASON Mr. Gordon moved to approve the request carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Gordon, Robinson, Massey, Winstead, NAYS: None ABSENT: None F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE None. G. .ATTACHMENTS '~ Concept Plan Vicinity Map Staff Report Other: (8~" x 11") (8~" x 11") with amended proffers. The motion Witt Terry Ha ington, ecretary Roanoke County Planning Commission Lro~ ~ rz~ .O•S6 / AC,~F . ~~p APIA Nas r7oo S~ F~ . ~~ ~1e~A r1As boo S~ ~'~ ~ S~o~ ~C-~acl a~~p(~.~ Aebo ZSoo s~ ~i. i l' ~~ t~~c~ Tif~k yAe~ ~f~X..rNC - -- ~A~E . - f G(Jrll~Ar~ 6 • H1A~a s a g~- 7 I-9-89 ~3R ~AmBIE~'oN t2tA~ #~~ . ~T _ ~ rr~ - - 46. T1 .b~ '~ .( ~o ,ptN~~ . ~ ~~ r '~ I ,; ~; .: `~ I , ;, l __ - ___ ___ 2 _ _ _ _ -- ~ ~ .~ .1 .~- hMwN -.- . ~ . L... poor .. ~ ~ •.. . • ~ _~ n.a ~ I ~ "'." I ~ r tl _ O ~ ~ 30 '~, ~ ~ 33 ~ ~ ~ ~ 4ook I: 11 t1 ~~ . ~ ~ .n a y ~ ~ ~ F~ •• Fl i ' N ~~ •J ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ r fi ~ S b , ~ ~ ~ M r 1 II II e.._~ 4 R3 ~! 1 O ,... M ~ R3 Il \ .~ °• R~ ~ ;, , ~. ~~~ ~0 R 3 ~ ~R3 ' ~ s • A B2 es g2 ~.a~ ~~ w B2C p~~' ~ ~ ` ` 81~ ~A1C ~ 82 • ~\~ S~\B~` ~ ~Z la•~ ~ g2 ~ /~oF ~~ ,i ,~ g3C ~ N- ALL PARCELS ON TH IS MAP ARE ZONED_ R1 ,UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED. ~i COMMUNITY SERVICES AND DEVELOPMENT WIL~~n.M MARS - 3 - AMft•1v'Fitvf~~'R~O GOtJUr~lorl5 77. v9 - ~ - X17 ~ ~~- 7 STAFF REPORT CASE NUMBER: 6-2/89 PETITIONER: WILLIAM MAAS REVIEWED BY: TERRY HARRINGTON DATE: FEBRUARY 7, 1989 Petition of William Maas to amend the proffered conditions dated Nov. 17, 1987 on a 0.56 acre tract to construct, assemble and sell wooden playground equipment, located at 3639 Brambleton Ave. in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District. 1. NATURE OF REQUEST a. Applicant has requested that the conditions attached to this M-1 parcel be modified so as to permit the property to be used for the manufacture and incide ntal display and sale of wooden playground equipment. All manufacturing activities will take place within the existing bl ock building on the site. The property was rezoned from B-2 to M-1 in 1987. The applicant has proffered five new conditions to replace the conditions accepted in 1987. A comparison of exis ting and proposed conditions follows: EXI~'TING PROP06ID 1. The M-1 use is limited to an automotive 1. No business hours after 9 p.m. repair shop only in the existing structure. 2. There will be no outside parking of non- 2. No outside storage of excess operable vehicles at the time the business lumber of any kind. is closed. 3. No outside storage of materials. 3. No large truck delivery (i.e. semi-trucks). 4. t3o stand alone signage. Sign will be part 4. Doors will be shut when saws of existing sign structure. are in progress. 5. Garage will not operate on Sunday or after 5. Outside display area will be after 9 p.m. on other days. in respectable condition at all times. 6. If no longer used as auto repair, will revert to B-2. 2. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS a. The manufacture of wood products is a permitted use in M-1 District. b. If this request is approved, a site development plan will be required. Screening will be required between the proposed M-1 use and the adjacent R-3 area. c. VDOT entrance permit will be required. 3. SITE CHARACTERISTICS a. Topography: Flat. b. Ground Cover: Existing building and pavement. 4. AREA CHARACTERISTICS a. Future Growth Priority: Situated within the Windsor Hills Community Planning Area. Designated for stable future growth, urban services available, commercial infill encouraged. - 4 - -'~ b. General area is densely developed with a mix of office and commercial uses. Property adjoins Brambleton Avenue, a heavily traveled primary highway. Rear of the property is separated from nearby residential subdivision by moderate slope and tree cover. 5. LAND USE IMPACT ASSESSMENT Rating: Rate each factor according to the impact of the proposed action. Use a scale of 1 through 5. 1 = positive impact, 2 = negligible impact, 3 = manageable impact, 4 = disruptive impact, 5 = severe impact, and N/A = not applicable. RATING FACTOR COMMENTS LAND USE COMPATIBILITY 4 a. Comprehensive Plan: 1985 Comprehensive Development Plan has placed this area within a Core land use category. The proposed use is not an encouraged land use type but does conform to policy C-2 (access to an arterial>, policy C-4 (coordinat.d site design-shared vehicular access), and can conform to policy C-5 (effective screening and buffering). 2 b. Surrounding Land: Intensely developed commercial, specifically retail service such as hardware store, cellular phone store, and pizza delivery. Undeveloped R-3 land to the rear of the site. 3 c. Neighboring Area: Mixed office, commercial, and densely developed single family detached housing. 2 d. Site Layout: Existing building and driveway to be unchanged. 2 e. Architecture: Exterior of existing block building to be unchanged except for addition of a doorway to display area. Building is to the rear of several other buildings and is not readily visible from the street. Interior of the building will be improved by addition of a reception area and restroom. 2 f. Screening and Landscape: As per ordinance. N/A g. Amenities: N/A h. Natural Features: TRAFFIC 2 i. Street Capacities: Brambleton Avenue would not be negatively impacted by the approval of this use. Retail uses of the property would likely generate more traffic. 4 j. Circulation: No effect on circulation to/from Brambleton Avenue. If 10 employees are on the site, parking will be a problem. If approved, parking alternatives can be evaluated at the site plan stage to determine zoning ordinance conformance. - 5 - -~ UTILITIES 3 k, Water: The requested use will have no impact on water facilities. 3 1. Sewer: The shop area will not be permitted to have any sanitary sewer discharge connections until such time as an industrial sewer use permit is applied for and issued. This does not apply to the bathroom planned for the office area. DRAINAGE 3 m. Basin: No increase in impervious area planned. N/A n. Floodplain: PUBLIC SERVICES 2 0, Fire Protection: Within established service area. 2 p, Rescue: Within established service area. N/A q. Parks and Recreation: N/A r. School: TAX BASE 3 s, - Land and Improvement Value: N/A - Taxable Gross Sales/Year: $189,000 - Total Employees: 4-10 roximatel N A - Total revenue to the County/Year: App Y / ENVIRONMENT N/A t. Air: N/A u. Water: N/A v. Soils: 3 w. Noise: Power tools could produce off-site noise if applicant does not comply with proffers. 3 x. signage: No limits on signage proffered. (, PLAN CONSISTENCY This area is designated as Core. The proposed land use type is not an encouraged use within this land use category. However, the proposal does conform with policies C-2, C-4 and possibly C-5. 7. STAFF EVALUATION a. Strengths: (1) Existing building situated at the rear of the property and is not visible from the street or surrounding properties. (2) Direct access to arterial highway. (3) No impact to nearby residential property (unless noise is generated). b, Weaknesses: (1) Land use type is not encouraged within the Core land use category. (2) Depending upon employment level, on-site parking could be a problem. c. Proffers suggested: permitted for this use. the uanuf acture and equipment. (1) No freestanding signage shall be (2) The property shall only be used fo: incidental sale of wooden playgrouni - 6 - ~_ VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OE' ROAI.TpKE COUNTY A .56 acre parcel of land, > at the rear of ) generally located 3639 Bramb leton Avenue ) Win sor i s ) within the Magisterial District, and ) ~ recorded as parcel # rear portion of) ~ 77.09-4-47 ) `~' in the Roanoke County Tax Records. ) FINAL ORDER TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY: ~~ ~~7 William G. Maas z WHEREAS, your Petir_ioner w rvisors to rezone the above-referenced parcel ~'' did petition the Board of County Supe 2 M-1 Conditional (amendment District ~ f rom M-1 Conditional District to of conditions) ~ for the purpose of assemb ly of wooden H ~ playground equipment Q w WHEREAS, after due legal notice, the Planning Commission did hold a public ~ February 7, , 19 89 , at which time, all parties ~ 'nearing of the petition on - a ~ in interest were given an opportunity to be heard; and February 28, ;n~~Ep,S, after full consideration at the public hearing held on 19 89, the Board of County Supervisors determined t'nat the rezoning be approved with proffers on 2/28/89• NOW, THEREFORE, BE I'I' ORDERED that the afor~nenti~~ O par471 of land, recorded contained in the Roanoke County Tax Maps as Parcel in Deed Book 1156 page 354 and legally described below, be .rezoned from M-1 Conditional (amendment District. M-1 Conditional District to of conditions) - 7 - Y '~ ~~~~~ Legal Description of Property: ~~~7 BEGINNING at a point at the northeast corner of the property of WADO Corporation (Deed Book 1198, Page 144); thence N. 58° 00' E. 90.00 feet to a point; thence S. 32° 00' E. 70.00 feet to a point; thence S. 58° 00' W. 90.00 feet to a point; thence N. 32° 00' W. 70.00 feet to a point. BE IT FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this order be transmitted to the Secretary of the Planning Coimnission and that he be directed to reflect that change on the official zoning map of Roanoke County. and upon the ADOPTED on motion of Supervisor following recorded vote: Aye; Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett ~'YS' None ABSENT: None L~-`~, `- ~Ga~y~/~ ' Deputy , Clerk Roanoke /County Board of Supervisors cc: John Willey, Director, Real Estate Assessment Terry Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning Arnold Covey, Director, Development & Inspections File - 8 - VIRGINIA: ~~~yr~ BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROAl~KE COUIaPY A 'S6 acre parcel of land, ) generally located at the rear of ) 3639 Brambleton Avenue ) PROFFER within the Windsor Hills ) OF Magisterial District, and ) CONDITIONS ~ recorded as parcel # rear portion of ) ao ~ 77.09-4-47 ) 0 N in the Roanoke County Tax Records. ) ~ THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF RQANOKE COUNTY: z Being in accord with Sec. 15.1-491.1 et seq. of the Code of Virginia and Sec. N 21-105E of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance, the Petitioner William Maas z ~ hereby voluntarily proffers to the o Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia the following conditions to the rezoning of the above-referenced parcel of land: G] (1) No business hours after 9 g W p.m. (2) No outside stora e of o excess lumber of any kind. (3) No large truck delivery (i.e. a semi-trucks). (4) Doors will be shut when saws are in progress. w (5) Outside display area will be in respectable condition at all ~ time. (6) No freestanding signage shall be permitted for this use. (7) The property shall only be used for the manufacture and incidental sale of wooden playground equipment. Respectfully submitted, i r ~ ~ ~~~ Petitioner - 9 - PETITIONER: LINGERFELT DEVE[APMENT CORPORATION ~CY~~ CASE Nt]MBEEt: 8-2/89 Planning Commission Hearing Date: February 7, 1989 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: February 28, 1989 A. RD~CJEST Petition of Lingerfelt Development Corporation to rezone a 2.768 acre tract fry M-2, Industrial to M-l, Industrial and obtain a Special Exception Permit fc related commercial uses to become part of Valleypointe, located on the north sic of Kenworth Road 119 feet west of its intersection with Peters Creek Road in tY Hollins Magisterial District. B. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION No one in opposition was present at the Planning Commission Public Hearing. C. SIGNIFICANT IMPACT FAC'IbRS 1. None. D. PROFFERED CONDITIONS 1. The property will not include permitted uses for automobile painting upholstering, repairing, rebuilding, .reconditioning, body and fender work truck repairing or overhauling, unless incidental to the user's principa business; manufacture of pottery and figurines or other similar cerami products; veterinary hospital and commercial kennels with exterior runs an yards; outside flea markets, unless a special exception has been granted b the Board of Supervisors. 2. The property will be developed so as to utilize landscaping and preserv existing vegetation where possible. No more than 75~ of each building sit will be developed for building and parking uses. 3. Outdoor advertising signs (billboards) will be prohibited. 4. There will be no outdoor storage except under the following conditions: tha it not be higher than the elevation of the building; that it not comprise a area greater than 50~ of the floor area of building; and that it be screene from view with landscaping and/or other approved screening materials i accordance with the provisions of the Roanoke County ordinance. 5. All utilities will be underground. 6. 'T'here will be no on-street parking. 7. The petitioner will review the drainage situation for Valleypointe an~ implement a design for drainage facilities to either retain or detain the two year storm (as has been required by Roanoke County) and to consider retentia or detention for a 10 year storm. E. COMMISSIONER'S MOTION, VOTE AND REASON Mr. Massey moved to approve the petition with proffered conditions. The motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Gordon, Robinson, Massey, Winstead, Witt NAYS: None ABSENT: None F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE None. G . ATI'ACHI~ETPI'S 1~ Concept Plan (8~" x 11") Vicinity Map (8~" x 11") Staff Report ~~ Other: Terry Har ngton, Se etary Roanoke ounty Plan ing Commission ~--' r~a~r ~t soeatv/~roa of prop-~tY o~ gEbrxGl PRoP.<arrES, a 3~ A YiR6rNM AEnERA6 PARTNEK3N/P Ph. to ~6. -H z y 4 ~_ H 62~ 93'r "F"' a+ -•--'- 330.00' r' ~~ d N 2.768 AG. .~ p ;~ o ~ 4d' fA4fMdNf lOEB aa6oa 4~1. ~ ~~ ~7f -NO ~IfirlttON 6'I+Zf ~-~, ~~ ~ oo 3a 11 r 414. 9' .r ms o~ z~ f- S z°00 r9" ~ ~ a ~ t pROPObE(l Ngri A 4-NE ~ •~ ~ ~ . Q1Vfhtp Q4~~ _ N TAX s 37.07.1.1 \ ~~ ~ w~ a a 2 r- g y ~ >t ~ g ~~ ~ t '_ ~~~~ J~ 1~ 6E&EN~ ,_._..-. p~rvoros ~eNce -~ rote otvc-~e ro~rEx ~r~ 8, 021 Ac. AgMAiN/N ~ PROPERTY 4 GO PO~t ON E~ p, g, x199 P0. 66¢ kENWDATH ~ R0~4 l~iF~rtl6ANF) PETERh GAEE!'G RDAs, N,W C YA, ROUTE ~tl7~ (a/w va~rFS) ?~?~T SaOk'ING ?RO?iRTY 12.768 AC.) TO SE COr"~"EFED TO LINGERFELT DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION BY ', SMITH'S TRAP~SFER CORPORATION SITCATED IN ! ~LT~ ~ HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT o~~ F y~C ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA I a~ 9.lEE ~ $ HE~/NOERSON, JR.> SrALE: 1" ~ 200' oAn: 2S Al3GUST 1988 I ~H a~ S ~,~• ptlfORD T. LUMSDEN ft ABSOCUTE8, P. C. ' 1~ ~ ENG~NEEq$-SURVEYCFtS ~VND'UEY~O R ROANOKE, wR01NU- I M.I ~. r ww •/ - ~ - J J' i ~`~ ~~ / t~ • ~' N_ RCELS ON THIS MAP , ,~, NED_, UNLESS / , ----- .~.r..i.~~rrr~ COMMUNITY SERVICES ~ avn D1~VBLOPMBNT ~,~~j(,A£RFELT Q£~IELVQM£nIT GURYVRATtotJ M 2 -fo M 1 ~~.07- 1-6 ~8~--g CASE NUMBER: S-2/89 REVIEWED BY: Jon Hartley STAFF REPORT PETITIONER: Lingerfelt Development Co. DATE: February 3, 1989 Petition of Lingerfelt Development Corporation to rezone a 2.768 acre tract from M-2, Industrial to M-1, Light Industrial and obtain a Special Exception Permit for related commercial uses to become part of Valleypointe, located on the north side of Kenworth Road 119 feet west of its intersection with Peters Creek Road in the Hollins Magisterial District. 1. NATURE OF REQUEST a. Petitioner has contracted to purchase a. 2.768 acre +.ract, which is presently part of Smith Transfer, in order to incorporate the tract into Valleypointe Park. The rezoning is requested in order to be consistent with the zoning for Valleypointe which was approved in October. 1987. b. Attached plat and zoning vicinity map describe proposal more fully. 2. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS a. M-1 zoning districts permit a variety of light manufacturing and industrial activities. The special exception permit would permit B-2 general commercial and B-1, office uses, as well as daycare centers and nursery schools, that are supportive of principal industrial area needs. Petitioner has proffered as a condition a prohibition on auto repair, manufacturing of ceramic products, veterinary hospitals and kennels, and billboards and limitations on outdoor storage. b. A special exception permit from the Board of Supervisors will be required for office uses within the M-1 zoning district. c. Site plan review will be required to ensure compliance with County regulations. 3. SITE CHARACTERISTICS a. Topography: Primarily flat. b. Ground Cover: Site has recently been filled. graded and seeded, with no natural vegetation remaining. 4. AREA CHARACTERISTICS a. Future Growth Priority: Situated within the Peters Creek Gommunity Planning area. Designated for future high growth, with urban services available. b. General area is bounded by I-581 and Peters Creek Road, the airport clear zone and Wood Haven Road. Existing heavy industrial uses are located to the immediate south of the proposed site and adjacent to the I-581/ Peters Creek Road interchange. 5. LAND USE IMPACT Rating: Rate each action. Use a scale 1 = positive impact, disruptive impact, 5 ASSESSMENT factor according to the impact of the proposed of 1 through 5. 2 = negtigible impact, 3 = manageable impact, 4 = = severe impact, and N/A = not applicable. - 4 - ~~ RATINGFACTOR COMMENTS LAND USE COMPATIBILITY 2 a. Comprehensive Plan: 1985 Comprehensive Development Plan has placed this area within a Principal Industrial land use category. Petitioner's request is consistent wi+.h the land use map a.nd defined policies. 2 b. Surrounding Land: Surrounded by existing industrial uses, I-581, Peters Creek Road and vacant land. 2 c. Neighboring Area: Effectively buffered from neighboring areas by surrounding properties described above. 3 d. Site Layout: Site will access off of the main boulevard into Valleypointe and incorporated into the overall concept for Valleypointe. No detailed site plans have been provided. On site drainage should be directed to Valleypointe Parkway in order to avoid discharge onto adjoining properties. 2 e. Architecture: Not specified. Protective covenants are proposed to create an architectural review process. 2 f. Screening and Landscaping: As per ordinance. Additional requirements are included within the proposed protective covenants. 2 g. Amenities: Proffer of conditions include preservation of natural vegetation, where possible, although little natural vegetation remains on this site. Additional protective covenants are proposed to address a variety of the amenities proposed in the Valleypointe master plan. 2 h. Natural Amenities: See above. TRAFFIC 2 i. Stre_t Capacities: The range of a.vera.ge trips per day is 108 ADT to 380 ADT depending upon the mix of office and manufacturing uses. A+. the time of the rezoning, Valleypointe was projected to generate between 2,000 and 7,100 ADT. depending upon the mix of uses. Gurrent ADT on Peters Creek Road exceeds 20,000 ADT. 2 j. Circulation: Access to the site will be provided by Valleypointe Parkway, which has been constructed and will be dedicated to the state. A traffic signal is to be installed at the intersection of Peters Creek Road and the Valleypointe Parkway. UTILITIES 2 k. Water: Adequate supply and distribution. 2 1. Sewer: Adequate treatment and transmission. DRAINAGE 2 m. Basin: Located in the Lick Run drainage basin which has been prone to severe downstream flooding. - 5 - • ~~~""lf N/A n. Floodplain: None. PUBLIC SERVICES 2 0. Fire Protection: Within established service standard. 2 p. Rescue: Within established service standard. 2 q. Parks and Recreation: Recreation facilities a.re proposed as part of the overall Valleypointe Park master plan. NiS r. Schools: TAX BASE 2 s. - Land a.nd Improvement Value: Not Ava.ila.ble - Taxable Gross Sales/Year: Not Available - Total Employees: Not Available - Total Revenue to the County/Year: Approximately ENVIRONMENT 2 t. Air: Protective covenants are proposed to address this item. 2 u. Water: Protective covenants are proposed t,o address this item. 2 v. Soils: 2 w. Noise: Protective covenants are proposed to address this item. 2 x. Signage: Proffer of conditions prohibit billboards. 6. PLAN CONSISTENCY This area is designated as Principal Industrial. The proposed rezoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan map and policies. 7. STAFF EVALUATION a. Strengths: (1) Petition is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan map and policies. (2) Parcel will be incorpo..~ted into an existing, planned industrial park. b. Weaknesses: (1) Drainage, if not properly directed, could adversely affect adjoining properties. c. Proffers Suggested: (1) On site drainage should be directed to Valleypointe Parkway. - 6 - ~6C/"°'~ VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY ~, A 2.768 acre parcel of land, ) ~ generally located on the ) o northwesterly side of Kenworth ) '"i Road within the Hollins Magis- ) FINAL ORDER N terial District, and recorded ) ~ as part of Parcel No. 37.07-1-6) ~ in the Roanoke County Tax ) Records. ) TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY: E-~ w WHEREAS, your Petitioner, Lingerfelt Development Corpora- E-' tion, a Virginia corporation, did petition the Board of County u Supervisors to rezone the above-referenced parcel from M-2 (General Industrial) District to M-1 (Light Industrial) o District for the purpose of a Mixed Use (Light Industrial) ~ Park. WHEREAS, after due legal notice, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing of the Petition on February 7, 1989, p at which time, all parties in interest were given an oppor- x tunity to be heard; and a a ~ WHEREAS, after full consideration at the public hearing held on February 28, 1989, the Board of County Supervisors determined that the rezoning be approved. with proffers. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDERED that the aforementioned parcel of land, which is contained in the Roanoke County Tax Maps as part of Parcel No. 37.07-1-6 and recorded in Deed Book 1289, Page 1309, and legally described below, be rezoned from M-2 (General Industrial) District to M-1 (Light Industrial) District. *See Exhibit "A" attached for description of property. BE IT FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this Order be trans- mitted to the Secretary of the Planning Commission and that he be directed to reflect that change on the official zoning map of Roanoke County. - 7 - cc: John Willey, Director, Real Estate Assessment ~ ~_ Terry Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning Arnold Covey, Director, Development & Inspections File ADOPTED on motion of Supervisor Nickens and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None ABSENT:None ABSTAIN: Supervisor McGraw ~")GLu~ ~ ~~~ Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors FXHTRIT "A" Being property located in the County of Roanoke, State of Virginia, and more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at a point designated as Point 1 on the hereinafter mentioned plat, said Point being located on the northwesterly side of Kenworth Road, said Point being also the southeasterly corner of the 10.78 acre parcel owned by Smithsub, Inc., a Virginia corporation, as described in Deed dated July 5, 1987, of record in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, in Deed Book 1289, page 1309; thence leaving Kenworth Road and with the northerly line of the property of Smithsub, Inc., N. 51° 37' 39" W. 736.50 feet to a point designated as 6A, being the ACTUAL PLACE OF BEGINNING; thence with a new division line through the property of Smithsub, Inc., S. 52° 00' 19" W. 414.89 feet to a point designated as 3A, said Point being on the line of the property of Overnight Transportation (Deed Book 972, page 569); thence with the northerly line of Overnight Transportation, N. 37° 03' 21" W. 325.00 feet to Corner 4, said point being on the southerly line of the property of Lingerfelt Development Corporation; thence leaving the line of Overnight Transportation and with the line of Lingerfelt Development Corporation, N. 52° 33' 19" E. 330 feet to Point 5; thence continuing with the Lingerfelt Development Corporation property, the following two courses and distances: S. 53° 11' 44" E. 54.5 feet to Corner 6 and thence S. 51° 37' 39" E. 277 feet to Point 6A, the ACTUAL POINT OF BEGINNING; and containing 2.768 acres and being as more particularly shown on Plat of Survey made by Buford T. Lumsden & Associates, P.C., Engineers & Surveyors, dated August 25, 1988. - 8 - a~~ VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY ~ A 2.768 acre parcel of land, ) oo generally located on the ) o northwesterly side of Kenworth ) ~ Road within the Hollins Magis- ) PROFFER OF N terial District, and recorded ) CONDITIONS as part of Parcel No. 37.07-1-6) in the Roanoke County Tax ) Records. ) ~'\ TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY: H z Being in accordance with Sec. 15.1-491.1 et seq. of the Code of Virginia and Sec. 21-105E of the Roanoke County Zoning p Ordinance, the Petitioner, Lingerfelt Development Corporation, u hereby voluntarily proffers to the Board of Supervisors of o Roanoke County, Virginia, the following conditions to the rezoning of the above-referenced parcel of land: Q 1. The property will not include permitted uses for: w ~ a. Automobile painting, upholstering, repairing, a rebuilding, reconditioning, body and fender a, work, truck repairing or overhauling, unless ~ incidential to the user's principal business. b. Manufacture of pottery and figurines or other similar ceramic products; c. Veterinary hospital and commercial kennels with exterior runs and yards; d. Outside flea markets, unless a special exception has been granted by the Board of Supervisors. 2. That the property will be developed so as to utilize landscaping and preserve existing vegetation where possible. No more than 75~ of each building site will be developed for building and parking uses. 3. Outdoor advertising signs (billboards) will be prohibited. - 9 - ~~~ 4. That there will be no outdoor storage except under the following conditions: a. that it not be higher than the elevation of the building; b. that it not comprise an area greater than 50~ of the floor area of the building; and c. that it be screened from view with landscaping and/or other approved screening materials in accordance with the provisions of the Roanoke County Ordinance. 5. That all tilities will be underground. 6. That them will be no on-street parking. ~, That the Petitioner will review the drainage situation for Valleypointe and implement a design for drainage facilities to either retain or detain the two (2) year storm (as has been required by Roanoke County) and to consider retention or detention for a ten (10) year storm. Respectfully submitted, LINGERFEL DEVELOPMEN CORPORATION By: G~ is Attorney - 10 - PETITIONER: ROANOKE COUNTY BOAf2D OF 'SUPERVISORS f (!ASE NUMBER: 11-2/89 Planning Cc~nission Hearing Date: February 7, 1989 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: February 28, 1989 A. g~UEST Petition of Roanoke CountynBoas d ofconstructra rescuensquad bu lding and for M-1, Industrial to B-1, Bust Planning Commission rev he slue Plan,np ocat d tatothe s ouptheaste corne roof facility with the Compre rin Magisterial District. Bram'pleton and Valley Forge avenues in the Cave Sp g B. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION No one in opposition was present at the Planning Con4nission Public Hearing. C. SIGDIIFICANT IMPACT :FACTORS g ui nt would be 1. Circulation: Prii~ciary access to the site and for emer encyoeq rP ae ( signal located off of Va lley~ Ff rthe light at Brambletoneand Valley Forge avenues preemption) is propos and is critical given the configuration and sight distances at thls intersection (primarily Garst Mill Road). A one-way entrance is proposed from Brambleton Avenue to improve access for volunteers during emergency response situations and avoid traffic crossing in front oFothg ~B amble~to n This entrance is in close proximity to the Valley intersection and would conflict taurants acrossuthe streetr Valley Forge and the entrances to two fast food res D. pROFFERED CONDITIONS e,~ner en entrance only 1. The entrance onto BrambleroonrAateusignsla d pavementymarkings~ and will be denoted by app p E. (~NA~IISSIONER'S MOTION, VOTE AND REASON rehensive Mr. Witt moved that petitioner's request is consistent with the Comp Plan. The motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Gordon, Robinson, Massey, Witt Npyg; Winstead ABSENT; None rove the petition with the proffered condition. The nx~tion Mr. Witt moved to app carried with the following roll callWiostead, Witt AYES; Gordon, Robinson, Massey, ~yS; None ABSENT: None F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE rehensive Plan was t< Mr. Winstead stated his view that the intent of the Camp ovidin community encourage an integrated and coordinated approach to p g f acilities. Further, in order towith one meeting roan should be provpdednfo~ approach 1n the County, one fac111ty effective emergency serviceCO t tof prow dinggeffect velpubl e service t oth~ as presented increases the County, and in his view is not e r~annendPd approachtfor COOSrdinated plannin Community Facilities Plan or lrirehensive Plan. that is at the core of the Comp G . ATTACHMENTS / Concept Plan (8~" x 11") Vicinity Map (8~" x 11") Staff Report Other: Ter Harrington, S retary Roanoke County Pla ning Commission ~~ ,aoo-.wK w....~ ~ ~~r ~~w`'ttwrwe "'°"ro~ wwe+w~~oa. r~ ~ twur ~o~r+~*+~ _ ~ ~ _ /'Q~Q~U ONtddS 3Atl'J ~ ~~~ . . ~~ ~ ~P,~ x~ ~~ L, ~ ~~~. .. I ~~ Z Q O J W t ~ f ~ ~ N ~~; ---; ~~ - ~_ __~~~ - ~~ ' ~- --'~. ~~_.• M r__ '_y a ~--- --~ (~" J U . n. -~• r-- ---~ R ~' ~___ ~ {L O J .~ ... ~. ~. - 2 ~- a s~-q -Q 83 : ~-~~ ~M2 ! ~ X~ s• ,, ~ \ T ` B2' $ \B1 B3 3 ~ ~ B1 ~ , A 1 t ~Parrc-~ 15 ?. \ \ ~ B2 ~ ~ + ~1 LE.Sh ~ ~ ! I ~ \ '~. P B3 i / ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ G~s ~ ~ ,e ~ ~ ~ pr,ry ,1a,.,i,nwlw ti-a ~ ~ O 2.~Olk lD1 ~ a 3.,.k~ B2 83 ~ ~ ~~ ~~ • r ~ • ~ / ~ o~yy ~ q M s ~ 4 1 w 4 1 ~' ~ ~~ / i ~ M M 4 M ~ ~ ~, 9 w I6.OtAa \~ IS ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ ,o B2 B 80 ,i , M / M+ ~ ~ ~ • ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ BZ ~ ! • ` ` ~~ N N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~' B2a w :'' , ~ ~~ ,.~, „' '~ 4' ~ ~~ , M ~ ~ ~ ` B~ J ~ b4 r , 20 ` ~ N 8 i ~ ~ i a BZ 32~ ~ ~ ~Z1 • , ID ~ S ~ ~• ffi e ~~i ~~ ' _____ 45 M ~ ~ • ~ ; ~ t ~ ~ ~ B3 ' B2 ,,..~ t,,. ,. ~ ~ ~ ~ I ,~ ~' ~,. ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ` ' • N • S~ ~ I / I ' k+, n ~ ~ / r , l ~ 2" ,~ B3 ~~ ~R1 bi , ~,a ~~~T ~j , ~ ,, r_ R'^-t- 36 i0 ~ ~ ~ ~:.. N ~_ ...- ~ ~ ~~L RpAtlpKtt Gnu1J'CY '~~~~`Wt'~..--. _-~ . GMUNITI' SERVICES - 3 1`'11 C -~o fit +~ `~ 6 K~ ~~ : ~ DEVELOPMENT -~~ . t 3 - ?, - 3 ~ `~ STAFF REPORT CASE NUMBER: 11-2/89 PETITIONER:Roanoke Co. Board of Supervisors REVIEWED BY: Jon Hartley DATE: February 3, 1989 Petition of Roanoke County Board of Supervisors to rezone a 1.03 acre tract from M-1, Industrial to B-1, Business to construct a rescue squad building and for Planning Commission review of the compatibility of a proposed rescue squad facility with the Comprehensive Plan, located at the southeast corner of Brambleton and Valley Forge Avenues in the Cave Spring Magisterial District. 1. NATURE OF REQUEST a. Petitioner proposes move from their pre proposed site. approximately 8,200 pieces of equipment to construct a new resctae squad facility and sent building located 1/10 mile south of the The two story building would contain square feet, with sufficient space for eight and a 1,100 square foot meeting room. According to Cave Spring Rescue Squad, there are six people on duty daily and a total membership of 41. This rescue squad responds to approximately 120 calls per month and serves a population of more than 27,000. Meetings and fund raising events are held in the evenings or on weekends and would not normally conflict with activities at the County Administration Center. The need for improvement of this facility was cited in the 1985 Roanoke County Community Facilities Plan and is the top priority for Fire and Rescue services upon completion of improvements under the 1985 bond referendum. Limited space for expansion and the cost to repair structural damage at the existing site has forced the rescue squad to consider a new facility. b. Attached concept plan and zoning vicinity map describe project more fully. 2. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS a. Public and non-profit organization uses, which would include a fire station or rescue squad facility. are permitted in ail of the residential and commercial districts. but are not. permitted in manufacturing districts. b. Site plan review will be required to insure compliance with County regulations. c. Commercial entrance permit will be required from VDOT. 3. S[TE CHARACTERISTICS a. Topography: Site consists of a combination of two flat areas which serve as auxiliary parking for the County Administration Center, and steep slopes between those parking areas. b. Ground Cover: Area is grassed, except for loose gravel in parking areas. 4. AREA CHARACTERISTICS a. Future Growth Priority: Situated within the Cave Spring Community Planning Area. The growth initiative for this area is to stabilize growth. - 4 - t" neral area is mixture of commercial, institutional and b, Ge residential uses. act of the p P 5, LAND USE IMPACT ASSESSMENT to the imp ro osed Rate each factor according Ratnng: q = action. Use a scale °f-lnegliggble.impact, 3 = manageable impact, 1 = positive impact, 2 = not applicable. disruptive impact, 5 = severe impact, and N/A COMMENTS RATNGFACTOR LAND USE COMPATIBILITY 1985 Comprehensive Development Plan Comprehensive Plan: ory. 3 a. ha.s placed this area within the Gore land rehensivegPlan The proposed use is consistent wltpolicy CoGPl+ encourage map and policies, including rovide development of mixed use urban development and p of services, and Policy C-4, coordinate efficient delivery the design of sites with regards tO from tBrambletonvAvenue However, proposed access directly oints. contradicts policy of minimizing vehicular access p Land: Surrounding land use is a combinafood ~ b, Surrounding (convenience store and fast of commercial le family residential restaurants), institutional and sing uses. c, Neighboring Area: Adjacent uses include an auto repair 2 shop and the County Administration Cen er. t lan and floor plans. d, Site LaYout~ See attached concep P 3 building would be constructed into The proposed two story u er and lower parking the grade between the existiand meeting room would be areas. The upper floor This parking area accessible from the rear parking area. would also be connected to the interior driveway system at the Administration Center. According to standards from the Institute of Transportation Parkin Generation by spaces will remain with the Engineers, sufficient parking based County Administraaienan~nthe numbercofinempioyeesand, on the square foot g e, Architecture: Not specified. .. and Landscaping: As required by ordinance. 2 f, Screening g, Amenities: 2 h. Natural Amenities: TRAFFIC Trip Generation by the Institute of 2 i, Street Capacities: Transportation Engineers contains no standard for fire an rescue facilities. Sta@i 50tADTtbasedhaontemployeesland would generate approximat Y the number of calls. In~i9$50thandDonaValleYtFoogehAvenue on Brambleton Avenue was was 779. The ADT onterrsandMBrambletonetAvenueavwasS7r603 Corners Shopping Ce - 5 - . orted accidents in the vicinity of ADT. There were 9 reP ~ ~p~P;~ the Brambleton/Valley Forge Avenue intersection. __11 (( ency Circulation: Primary access to the site andefAvenuerg An i• equipment would be located off of Valley org nal preemption) is proposed for the emergency override (sig Forge Avenues and is light at Brambleton and VaIIeY ht distances at critical given the configuration and sig one-way this intersection primarily Garst Mill Road)• At,o im rove entrance is proposed from Brambleton response situations access for volunteers during emergency and avoid traffic crossing in front of the vehicle ays. roximity to the VaIIeY This entrance is in close p Forge/Brambleton intersectFor endanduthe entranceswlto two left turn lane for Valley g fast food restaurants across the street. 4 UTiL1TIES 1 and distribution. 2 k, Water: Adequate suPP y 2 1, Sewer; Adequate treatment and transmission. DRAINAGE a basin. 2 m, Basin: Located in the Mud Lick Creek drainag NiA n. Ftoodplain: Not applicable. PUBLIC SERVICES Within established service standard. 2 0, Fire Protection: 1 p, Rescue: N/A q. Parks and Recreation: N/A r. Schools: TAX BASE N/A s. - Land and Improvement Value: - Taxable Gross Sales/Year: - Total Employees: A roximately - Total Revenue to the County/Year: PP ENVI 2 t. 2 u. 2 v. 2 w. 2 x. RONMENT Air: Water: Soils: Noise: Signage: Not specified. g, PLAN CONSISTENCY The proposed rescue squad facility rehensive Plan map and policies. except This area is designated as Gore. Dints is consistenWhichthencourages minimizing the number of access P policy C-4. alr,np maiar arterial roa~i~' _ 6 - a~~-9 7, STAFF EVALUATION Would provide a new facility as rePooposald is Strengths: (1) Plan. (2) a' Community Facilities the County and policies. consistent with the Comprehensive Plan map tion) at override (signal preemp (1) The emergency iven the b. Weaknesses: Forge Avenues is critical g rimarily Brambleton and Valley ose uration and sight distances at this intersection P conf i g wou 1 d Garst Mill Road). (2) The ae~grambleBonmbnteorsectioneand c proximity to the Valley Forg conflict with other turning movements in this immediate area ency override on the ested: (1) The emerg Proffers Sugg a Ave. signal shall be installed a2d c• Forg ancy. Brambleton/Valley ermi n ed. activated prior to issBrambletonh Avenuelshallebefpoccu No direct access from - 7 - c~~f1-~ rn 0 N H 2 W H z 0 U O H Q W 0 x a a VIRCLNIA% BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF RQANOKE COUNTY 0.75+ acre parcel of land, ) A _~,_ generally located southeast corner ) Brambleton Ave. and Valley Forge Ave.) Cave Spring ) within the Magisterial District, and recorded as parcel # 77..13-3-3, & -4 ) in the Roanoke County Tax Records. ~ FILL ORDII2 2~0 THE IGNORABLE SUPERVISORS OF RQANOKE COUNTY: Roanoke County Board of Supervisors ~EgEp,S, your Petitioner rcel did petition the Board of County Supervisors to rezone the above-referenced pa B-1 District froim M-1 Li ht Industrial District to for the purpose of Rescue Squad Facility 1 notice, the Planning Commission did hold a public WHEREAS, after due legs at which time, all parties February 7 ~ 19 89 , hearing of the petition on in interest were given an opportunity to be heard; and held on February 28, WHEREAS, after full consideration at the public hearing 19 89 , the Board of County Supervisors determined that the rezoning be a roved with roffers on 2 2 that the aforementioned parcel of land, which is NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDERED as Parcel 77.13-3-3 & -4 and recorded contained in the Ro209 e CO~ty ~3~~and legally described below. be rezoned fran in Deek Book Page B-1 District. M-1 District to - 8 - .~ ~~- 9 Legal Description of Property: BEGINNING at a iron pin set at the nor AVenue;lthencecwith of Brambleton Avenue and Valley Porge the east right-of -w ay line of Brambleton Avenue N 58° 00' 00" E end of ae30"thigh stone walleandebeinge the front corner beVernonLHeightsidthence Section 4 of Mount leaving Brambleton Avenue and with Lot 4 S 32° 00' 00" E 200.00 feet to an old iron pin found at the corner of Lots 4, 5, 7 and 8, Section 4 of Mount Vernon Heights; said iron pin located N 85° 51' 16" W, 35.25 feet Administration the southwest corner of tLOtC4uand with Building; thence leaving Lots 7 and 8 S 17° 07' 00" W 124.74 feet to an iron pin set ont thence norht right-of-way of Valley Forge Avenue and a frLno~ 8 andrthe front7ofnLot~7 and leaving of Valley with the north right-of-way Forge Avenue N 72° 53' 00" W 107.99 feet to an iron pin set at the corner of Lots 6 and withhtheenorthlr9ght-of-way Lot 7 and cont enAvenue of Valley Forg p , S5' 00" W 39.52 feet to a iron pin set at the point where the new right-of-way of Valley Forge begins; thence with the new right-of-way N 31° 34' 20" W 21.13 feet to a iron pin set; thence continuing with the new right-of-way N 40° 11' 30" W 47.74 feet to a iron pin set; thence continuing with the new right-of-way N 54° 00' 14" W 81.66 feet to a iron pin set; thence continuing with the new right-of-way N 2° 32' Ol" E 23.67 feet to the point of beginning; containing 1.03 acres, more or less, according to a survey by Buford T. Lumsden 6 Associates BEING all of Lots 5 and 7 and part of Lot 6, Section 4, of the Mount Vernon Bco veyeduto1the1BoarddofeSupervisors of the real pzoperty 1983 and recorded of Roanoke County by deed dated Juazt2of the real property in Deed Book 1195, Page 98 and a p conveyed to the Boa16,o1984peandsrecorded inoDeed Book by deed dated July 1209, Page 369. BE IT FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this order be transnitted to the Secretary of the Planning Commission and that he be directed to reflect that change on the official zoning map of Roanoke County. N i c ke n s and upon the ADOPTED on motion of Supervisor following recorded vote: AYF~: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett 1~YS ~ None ABSEDTr : None ~~~~ ~ ~~~-~ ~ D~~~ Clerk Roa o e C unt Board of Supervisors cc: John Willey, Director, Real-Es~a~e ~ss~ssment Terry Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning Arnold Covey, Director, Development & Inspections File - 9 - ~~: BF,FpRE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROAIJ~RE COU[~I'Y p, 0.75+ acre parcel of land, ) ` generally located southeast corner ) Brambleton Ave and Valley Forge_Ave. ) within the Cave Spring ) rn Magisterial District, and ) °0 77.13-3-3 & -4 ) ~ recorded as parcel # 0 ~ ) ro in the Roanoke County Tax Records. ) H z W H z 0 U 0 H 0 w 0 a a a PROFFER OF COI~IDITIONS Tp THE HODIORABZE SUPERVISORS OF RQANOKE COUNTY: Being in accord with Sec. 15.1-491.1 et seq. of the Code of Virginia and Sec. Roanoke County 21-105E of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance, the Petitioner Board of Supervisors hereby voluntarily proffers to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia the following conditions to the rezoning of the above-referenced parcel of land: 1. 'Ihe entrance onto Brambleton Avenue will be a one-way emergency entrance only and will be denoted by appropriate signs and pav~nent markings. Respectfully sutmitted, i ~~ ~~~ ~ Petitioner - 10 - O~ ROANO~~` ~.~ . p Z o .Z v `'a 8 E50 $8 SFSQtIICEN7ENN~P~ A Beauti~ulBeginning COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE Ms. Marilyn Morehead 927 Ridgecrest Drive Roanoke, Virginia 24019 March 7, 1989 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS LEE GARRETT. CHAIRMAN WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT RICHARD W ROBERS. VICE-CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT STEVEN A. MCGRAW CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT Dear Ms. Morehead Board of Supervisors have asked me to express their sincere The our previous service to the Court Service Unit appreciation for Y Youth and Family Services Board. Allow me to Advisory Council/ ou served on this Board. personally thank you for the time y itizens so responsive to the needs of their community an ' lin to give of themselves and their time are indeed all 00 C wil g scarce. Very truly yours Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors bjh Director of Court Services cc: Michael Lazzuri, (~uunty of +~nttnnl e P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 2 4018-07 9 8 <703) 772-2004 O H Q w E""'' W V J W F~~-1 W W a z a H ~~ r" -~I ~ W Q '-' ~ O W x H ~ U w O ~ z O w U ~ ~ O w O E-' Z ~ ~ ~ O ~ O ~ D `~, c~ w ~ ~ Q Q ~ w ~ x Z O u~ H O w wl . Z H U u~ H Q ~ ~ w ~ ~.., N ~ w ,~ O ~ w U w N U ,_.., cwn Z ~ U Z z ~ O H w ~ O O H d H Q z 0 u N Q ~Q A N W z e ~ ~.~ v ~° ~ ~¢ ,~-:y O a~.~~ ~ H ~; ~ ~ O u O~ POANps.~ a ~ ti ~ p 2 GD ~ 2 J .a 18 ~~ 88 S~SQUICENTENN~P~ A Beautifu/Bcginning C~nixn#~ n~ ~nttnvk~e BOARD OF SUPERVISORS COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE March 1, 1989 Mr. W. Robert Herbert, Chairman Roanoke Regional Airport 1635 Aviation Drive Roanoke, Virginia 24012 Dear Mr. Herbert: LEE GARRETT. CHAIRMAN WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT RICHARD W. ROBERS. VICE•CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT STEVEN A. MCGRAW CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT Attached is a certified copy of Resolution No. 22889-2 approving the Fiscal Year 1989/90 Operating Budget for the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission. This resolution was adopted by the Board of Supervisors at their meeting on Tuesday, February 28, 1989. If you need further information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, ~. Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors bjh Attachment P.O. BOX ?_9800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 2 4018-07 9 8 <703) 772-2004 OF AOANp~.~ ti ' ~ 9 /r Z ~ ~~ ~~~~~~~e v a ~~~~~ 18 ; E50 88 SFSQUICENTENN~P~ .>, Beauti~ulBeginning BOARD OF SUPERVISORS LEE GARRETT. CHAIRMAN WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT RICHARD W. ROBERS. VICE-CHAIRMAN COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT ELMER C HODGE BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT STEVEN A. MCGRAW March 1, 19 8 9 CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT Jack Spain, Jr., Esquire Hunton & Williams P. 0. Box 1535 Richmond, Virginia 23212 Dear Mr. Spain: Attached is a certified copy of Resolution No. 22889-2 approving the Fiscal Year 1989/90 Operating Budget for the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission. This resolution was adopted by the Board of Supervisors at their meeting on Tuesday, February 28, 1989. If you need further information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors bjh Attachment P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 2 4018-07 9 8 (703: 772-2004 O~ pOANp,~.~ ~ •~ Z 9 _~_ J a 18 >~~ 88 SFS~IUICENTENN~P~ A Beauti ful Beginning COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE Mrs. Mary F. Parker, Clerk City of Roanoke 215 Church Avenue, S.W. Roanoke, Virginia 24011 Dear Mary; LEE GARRETT. CHAIRMAN WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT RICHARD W. ROBERS. VICE-CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT STEVEN A. MCGRAW CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT March 1 , 1989 HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT Attached is a copy of Resolution No. 22889-2 approving the Fiscal Year 1989/90 Operating Budget for the Roanoke Regional Airport M Commission. This resolution was adopted by the Board of Supervisors at their meeting on Tuesday, February 28, 1989. If you need further information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, bjh Attachment C~v~tnt~ of ~nttnnh~ BOARD OF SUPERVISORS .~/ Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 2 4018-07 9 8 (703) 772-2004 O~ pOAN ~.~ ~ L ti A Z 0 2 a 18 ~.~ 88 aFSQUICENTENN~P~' A BmwriJwlBeginning COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE C~vixnt~ ~~ ~uttnukr March 6, 1989 Mr. Gary J. Minter 829 Dexter Road Roanoke, Virginia 24019 Dear Gary: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS LEE GARRETT, CHAIRMAN WINDSOR NII..LS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT RICHARD W. RO9ERS. VICE•CHAIRMAN GVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRCT STEVEN A. MCGRAW GTAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT This is to advise that at their meeting held on Tuesday, February 28, 1989, the Board of Supervisors voted unanimously to appoint you as a member of the Court Service Unit Advisory Council/Youth and Family Services Board for a two-year term which will expire on March 22, 1990. State law provides that any person elected, re-elected, appointed or reappointed to any body be furnished a copy of the Freedom of Information Act; your copy is enclosed. We are also sending you a copy of the Conflict of Interest Act. It is necessary that you take an oath of office before the Clerk ~- of the Roanoke County Circuit Court. This oath must be administered rp for to your participation on this Committee. Please phone Mrs. Elizabeth W. Stokes, Clerk at 387-6208 as soon as possible and arrange to have the oath administered. On behalf of the Supervisors and the citizens of Roanoke County, please accept our sincere thanks and appreciation for your willingness to accept this appointment. Very truly yours, y Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors bjh Enclosures CC: Mrs. Elizabeth Stokes Mike Lazzuri, Director of Court Services P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24018-0798 - (703) 772-2004 OF AOApp~~ ~ •~ ~ z ~ ~' J 2 a 8 ~.~ $8 aFSGU/CENTENN~P~ A Btauti fulBtginning COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE Ms. Marilyn Morehead 927 Ridgecrest Drive Roanoke, Virginia 24019 Dear Ms. Morehead March 7, 1989 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS LEE GARRETT. CHAIRMAN WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT RICHARD W. ROBERS. VICE-CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT STEVEN A. MCGRAW CATAW BA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VIN TON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT The Board of Supervisors have asked me to express their sincere appreciation for your previous service to the Court Service Unit Advisory Council/Youth and Family Services Board. Allow me to personally thank you for the time you served on this Board. Citizens so responsive to the needs of their community and willing to give of themselves and their time are indeed all too scarce. Very truly yours ~' Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors bjh cc: Michael Lazzuri, Director of Court Services (~aunfy of "iRattnnkr P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 2 4018-07 98 (703) 772.2004 O~ ROANp~~ ~ ^ ~ ~ 2 G A J ~ ? ~ a 18 ~E50 88 SFSQVICENTENN~P~' :1 Bra miwl8e~inninR COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE (~nixnt~ of ~uttnnhe January 5, 1989 Rev. Louis E. Carson Cave Spring United Methodist Church 4505 Hazel Drive, S.W. Roanoke, Virginia 24018 Dear Reverend Carson: On behalf of the Board of Supervisors, I for agreeing to give the invocation at the meeting on Tuesday, February 2g, 1989, BOARD OF SUPERVISORS LEE GARRETT. CHAIRMAN WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT RICHARD W. ROBERS. VICE-CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS M4GISTE RIAL DISTRICT STEVEN A. MCGRAW CATAW BA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C.NICKENS VIN TGN MAG 6TE RIAL DISTRICT ~Q> 9 ~q- 3c~~3 "~ ~ s.:' ...`W' '`~ ~ ~,' "~ 1 I+~kt` 4. h..~ _. ~~ ~: 1"" ~'i would like to thank you Board of Supervisors' On Monday before the board meeting, I will call you as a reminder. If you find at any time that you are unable to do this for us, please let me know so that other arrangements can be made. My telephone number is 772-2005, The Board members are aware of how they appreciate your volunteering blessing at their meetings. Sincerely, busy your schedule is, and the time to offer God's ~~~~ • ~~~ Brenda J. Holton, Secretary Roanoke County Board of Supervisors P.O. BOX 29800 ROAPJOKE. VIRGINIA 24018-0798 (703) 772-?004 PROPERTY OF (,AN~MAlZjt, pROPERTIEy, /NG, ,~. ~° .• ~~ ~~ o,~~ z~ ~~ n r, v, -• f~` u, ~i; m 5 EX~SI l0'x15'C~U>' ANGN~''a .`AtiElti~NT ~. Gu~-~~ '.A.. A = 0°57'00" V = ~. '15 ,H n J ~~T ~ ;r.'~f'r / r• .~ _ QQ 77 00' N t N h l L~ } r~.oo' ~! NEW ~ANlIAaY = ~ ~.1. ; ~`AhEMENt o m N ~~ G Or 4 `~ o ~,; .. ~ o ~~ _ ~ ~ ~ g ~ b --- ~ u> ~ ,~ EXlht/NG ' N Im° - on ~cc~ ~ o I ~ __. _. _ N79°01'0"E.5,00'~,;-~` ~-~/ _ Q ~ _~ z m ~ ~J o ~ ~~z1 ~ 4 15 ' e ,00 ~A.. ~ ~ 79°Ol'~0 ~ gq,Gp' G ~ ~E~ v~oo~a ~a~ v~ 3 ExrS>', g0'M~N. gurr,~~NG LrNE ~lt~~ ~~ PUBLIC NOTICE Please be advised that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, at its meeting on March 14, 1989, at the Roanoke County Administration Center, 3738 3:~ Brambleton Avenue, Roanoke, Virginia, at the evening session beginning ~:~t7 p.m. will hold a public hearing on the following matter, to-wit: ORDINANCE AME~IDING SECTION 21-4 (a) , ENHANCED II~9ERGENCY TET,EpI-~ TAX, OF '1'f-IE ROANOKE O~Y CODE REDUCING THE TAX ON PURCHASES OF LOCAL TELEPHCX~IE SERVICE TO FUND THE E911 EMERGENCY TELEPHONE SYSTEM All members of the public interested in the matter set forth above may appear and be heard at the time and place aforesaid. l,(,lc~ D Vl.. Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney of Roanoke County, Virginia Publish on the following dates in the morning edition: February 28, 1989 March 7, 1989 Send invoice to: Board of Supervisors P. 0. BOX 29800 Roanoke, Virginia 24018-0798 1 c1~ PUBLIC IVCTICE Please be advised that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, at its meeting on March 14, 1989, at the Roanoke County Administration Center, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, Roanoke, Virginia, at the afternoon session beginning 3:00 p.m. will hold a public hearing on the following matter, to-wit: ORDINANCE AMQ~IDING AND REQVACTING SECTION 21-151, LEVY OF TAX; AN10U[~TT OF THE ROANOKE COUrITY CODE TO PROVIDE FOR THE TAXATION OF FOOD THAT IS SOLD FIR OFF-PREMISES CONSL~TION All members of the public interested in the matter set forth above may appear and be heard at the time and place aforesaid. Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney of Roanoke County, Virginia Publish on the following dates in the morning edition: February 28, 1989 March 7, 1989 Send invoice to: Board of Supervisors P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, Virginia 24018-0798 L E G A L N O T I C E Notice is hereby given to all interested persons that the :Zoanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at their evening session beginning at 7:00 p.m. on Tuesday, FEBRUARY 28, 1989, _989 in the Community Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, :3738 Brambleton Avenue, S.W., Roanoke, Virginia, on the petition of THE ltOANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS requesting rezoning from M-1, LIGHT INDUSTRIAL to B-1 COMMERCIAL of a tract containing 1.03 ACRES and :_ocated ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF BRAMBLETON AND VALLEY FORGE AVENUES :.n the CAVE SPRING Magisterial District. Rezoning has been requested to CONSTRUCT A NEW FACILITY FOR CAVE :SPRING RESCUE SQUAD, INC.. The County Planning Commission recommends ~,PPROVAL~WITH PROFFERED CONDITIONS. A copy of the Zoning Ordinance of Roanoke County and amendments thereto as well as a copy of the petition, site plan, and other documents related to this request may be examined in the office of the Department of Planning and Zoning, located in Room 600 of the Roanoke County Administration Center. Roanoke County will provide assistance to handicapped persons c.esiring to attend public hearings. Such individuals are requested to contact the County office of Personnel Services ([703] 772-2018) if special provisions are necessary for attendance. Given under my hand this 9TH day of FEBRUARY, 1989. ~a~~ . Mary H. Allen, Deputy~Clerk Roanoke County Board of.Supervisors Please publish in the evening edition of the Roanoke Times and World News on: T;JESDAY, FEBRUARY 14, 1989 T:JESDAY, FEBRUARY 21, 1989 Direct the bill for Publication to: ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS P. 0. BOX 29800 ROANOKE, VA. 24018-0798 L E G A L N O T I C E Notice is hereby given to all interested persons that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at their evening session beginning at 7:00 p.m. on Tuesday, FEBRUARY 28, 1989 in the Community Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, S.W., Roanoke, Virginia, on the petition of LINGERFELT DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION requesting rezoning from M-2 INDUSTRIAL to M-1 INDUSTRIAL WITH A SPECIAL EXCEPTION PERMIT FOR RELATED COMMERCIAL USES of a tract containing 2.768 ACRES and located ON THE NORTH SIDE OF KENWORTH ROAD, 120 FEET WEST OF ITS INTERSECTION WITH PETERS CREEK ROAD in the HOLLINS Magisterial District. Rezoning has been requested to INCORPORATE THIS PARCEL INTO VALLEYPOINTE PARK. The County Planning Commission recommends APPROVAL WITH PROFFERED CONDITIONS. A copy of the Zoning Ordinance of Roanoke County and amendments thereto as well as a copy of the petition, site plan, and other documents related to this request may be examined in the office of the Department of Planning and Zoning, located in Room 600 of the Roanoke County Administration Center. Roanoke County will provide assistance to handicapped persons desiring to attend public hearings. Such individuals are requested to contact the County office of Personnel Services ([703] 772-2018) if special provisions are necessary for attendance. Given under my hand this 9TH day of FEBRUARY, 1989. Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors ?lease publish in the evening edition ~f the Roanoke Times and World News on: TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 14, 1989 PUESDAY, FEBRUARY 21, 1989 Direct the bill for Publication to: MICHAEL K. SMELTZER P. 0. BOX 720 ROANOKE, VA. 24004-0720 L E G A L N O T I C E Notice is hereby given to all interested persons that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at their evening session beginning at 7:00 p.m. on Tuesday, FEBRUARY 28, 1989 in the Community Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, S.W., Roanoke, Virginia, on the petition of WILLIAM MAAS requesting rezoning from M-1 CONDITIONAL to M-1 CONDITIONAL (AMENDMENT OF CONDITIONS) of a tract containing .056 ACRE and located 3639 BRAMBLETON AVENUE in the WINDSOR HILLS Magisterial District. Rezoning has been requested to ALLOW THE PROPERTY TO BE USED FOR THE MANUFACTURE AND DISPLAY OF WOODEN PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT. The County Planning Commission recommends APPROVAL WITH PROFFERED CONDITIONS. ~A copy of the Zoning Ordinance of Roanoke County and amendments thereto as well as a copy of the petition, site plan, and other documents related to this request may be examined in the office of the Department of Planning and Zoning, located in Room 600 of the Roanoke County Administration Center. Roanoke County will provide assistance to handicapped persons desiring to attend public hearings. Such individuals are requested to contact the County office of Personnel Services ([703] 772-2018) if special provisions are necessary for attendance. Given under my hand this 9TH day of FEBRUARY, 1989. ~- Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Please publish in the evening edition ~f the Roanoke Times and World News on: TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 14, 1989 TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 21, 1989 Direct the bill for Publication to: WILLIAM G. MAAS 1923 CAPTAIN DRIVE SALEM, VA. 24153 986-1138 L E G A L N O T I C E Notice is hereby given to all interested persons that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at their evening session beginning at 7:00 p.m. on Tuesday, FEBRUARY 28, 1989 in the Community Room of the. Roanoke County Administration Center, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, S.W., Roanoke, Virginia, on the petition of J. L. WOLTZ AND R. N. BRADLEY requesting rezoning from R-1 RESIDENTIAL to R-3 RESIDENTIAL of a tract containing 2.92 ACRES and located AT 3464 CHAPARRAL DRIVE in the CAVE SPRING Magisterial District. Rezoning has been requested to CONSTRUCT MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENCES. The County Planning Commission recommends DENIAL. A copy of the Zoning Ordinance of Roanoke County and amendments hereto as well as a copy of the petition, site plan, and other 3ocuments related to this request may be examined in the office of the department of Planning and Zoning, located in Room 600 of the Roanoke ~ounty Administration Center. Roanoke County will provide assistance to handicapped persons iesiring to attend public hearings. Such individuals are requested to :ontact the County office of Personnel Services ([703] 772-2018) if special provisions are necessary for attendance. Given under my hand this 9TH day of FEBRUARY, 1989. ~~_ ~. Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors ~~lease publish in the evening edition cif the Roanoke Times and World News on: TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 14, 1989 TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 21, 1989 Direct the bill for Publication to: J. L. WOLTZ 5249 CLEARBROOK LANE S.W. ROANOKE, VA. 24014 774-5263 L E G A L N O T I C E Notice is hereby given to all interested persons that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at their evening session beginning at 7:00 p.m. on Tuesday, FEBRUARY 28, 1989 in the Community Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 3738 Branbleton Avenue, S.W., Roanoke, Virginia, on the petition of FEKAS HOMFS, INC. (NOW S.C. ROSSI & COMPANY) requesting rezoning from RE, RESIDENTIAL ESTATES to M-2, GENERAL INDUSTRIAL of a tract containing 3.7` ACRES and located AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION OF 16TI: STREET AND CARLISLE AVENUE in the VINTON Magisterial District. Rezoning has been requested to EXPAND THE EXISTING CONCRETE PRODUCTION FACILITY NORTH OF THE SITE. The County Planning Commission recommends APPROVAL WITH THE PROFFERED CONDITIONS. A copy of the Zoning Ordinance of Roanoke County and amendments thereto as well as a copy of the petition, site plan, and other doc~~ments related to this request may be examined in the office of the Dep;~rtment of Planning and Zoning, located in Room 600 of the Roanoke Cou~ity Administration Center. Roanoke County will provide assistance to handicapped persons des_ring to attend public hearings. Such individuals are requested to con~:act the County office of Personnel Services ([703] 772-2018) if spe:ial provisions are necessary for attendance. Given under my hand this 9TH day of FEBRUARY, 1989. ~~w~~ f-, Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board. of Supervisors Please publish in the evening edition of she Roanoke Times and World News on: TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 14, 1989 TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 21, 1989 Direct the bill for Publication to: RICHARD WILLET, P.E. BRIGHTWATERS ENGINEERING 4836 WARRIOR DRIVE SALEM, VA. 24153 380-2944 L E G A L N O T I C E Notice is hereby given to all interested persons that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at their evening session beginning at 7:00 p.m. on Tuesday, FEBRUARY 28, 1989 in the Community Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, S.W., Roanoke, Virginia, on the petition of J. EDWARD CONKER requesting rezoning from B-1 OFFICE AND R-1 RESIDENTIAL to B-2 GENERAL-COMMERCIAL of a tract containing 1.2 ACRES and located ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF PETERS CREEK ROAD, 280 FEET WEST OF ITS INTERSECTION WITH SOUTH DRIVE in the HOLLINS Magisterial District. Rezoning has been requested to CONSTRUCT AND OPERATE A RESTAURANT. The County Planning Commission recommends APPROVAL WITH PROFFERED CONDITIONS. A copy of the Zoning Ordinance of Roanoke County and amendments thereto as well as a copy of the petition, site plan, and other documents related to this request may be examined in the office of the Department of Planning and Zoning, located in Room 600 of the Roanoke County Administration Center. Roanoke County will provide assistance to handicapped persons desiring to attend public hearings. Such individuals are requested to contact the County office of Personnel Services ([703] 772-2018) if special provisions are necessary for attendance. Given under my hand this 9TH day of FEBRUARY, 1989. J~ Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Please publish in the evening edition of the Roanoke Times and World News on: TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 14, 1989 TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 21, 1989 Direct the bill for Publication to: J. EDWARD CONKER 6007 BUCKLAND MILL ROAD N. W. ROANOKE, VA. 24019 366-5012, 366-8394 L E G A L N O T I C E Notice is hereby given to all interested persons that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at their evening session beginning at 7:00 p.m. on Tuesday, FEBRUARY 28, 1989 in the Community Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, S~.W., Roanoke, Virginia, on the petition of CENTRAL FIDELITY BANK requesting rezoning from B-2 AND B-3 BUSINESS to B-2 BUSINESS of a tract containing 1.02 ACRES and located AT 4143 FRANKLIN ROAD in the CAVE SPRING Magisterial District. Rezoning has been requested to CONSTRUCT A FULL SERVICE BANK. The County Planning Commission recommends APPROVAL WITH PROFFERED CONDITIONS. ~P, copy of the Zoning Ordinance of Roanoke County and amendments thereto as well as a copy of the petition, site plan, and other documents related to this request may be examined in the office of the Department of Planning and Zoning, located in Room 600 of the Roanoke County Administration Center. Roanoke County will provide assistance to handicapped persons desiring to attend public hearings. Such individuals are requested to contact the County office of Personnel Services ([703 772-2018) if special provisions are necessary for attendance. Given under my hand this 9TH day of FEBRUARY, 1989. _ ~ ~ L~~e~ Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Please publish in the evening edition of the Roanoke Times and World News on: TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 14, 1989 TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 21, 1989 Direct the bill for Publication to: PATRICIA TORBERT BALZER AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 16 SOUTH COLLEGE AVENUE SALEM, VA. 24153 389-7323 L E G A L N O T I C E Notice is hereby given to all interested persons that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at their evening session beginning at 7:00 p.m. on Tuesday, FEBRUARY 28, 1989 in the Community Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, S.W., Roanoke, Virginia, on the petition of WILLIAM AND CATHERINE FORTUNE requesting A USE NOT PROVIDED FOR PERMIT to OPERATE A DOG AND CAT KENNEL IN ADDITION TO A RESIDENCE of a tract containing 5.45 ACRES and located AT 5647 LOWLAND LANE in the CAVE SPRING Magisterial District. The Planning Commission recommends APPROVAL OF THE PERMIT. A copy of the Zoning Ordinance of Roanoke County and amendments thereto as well as a copy of the petition, site plan, and other documents related to this request may be examined in the office of the Department of Planning and Zoning, located in Room 600 of the Roanoke County Administration Center. Roanoke County will provide assistance to handicapped persons desiring to attend public hearings. Such individuals are requested to contact the County office of Personnel Services ([703] 772-2018) if special provisions are necessary for attendance. Given under my hand this 9TH day of FEBRUARY, 1989. rn~~~ ~ Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Please publish in the evening edition of the Roanoke Times and World News on: TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 14, 1989 TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 21, 1989 Direct the bill for Publication to: WILLIAM AND CATHERINE FORTUNE 5647 LOWLAND LANE ROANOKE, VA. 24018 989-1900 D R A F T L E G A L N O T I C E Notice is hereby given to all interested persons that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at their evening session beginning at 7:00 p.m, on Tuesday, 198', in the Community Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, S.W., Roanoke, Virginia, on the petition of c,' requesting ,_ ~`r ~ ~- . E ~.. . r ~_ - ,,,;. j{ r > 'i re~~on1~~...-f~~©~ 2 ~c ~~ ~ <:~~ :~ a tract containing s~~~~' ~ ~` ~~ ~~' and '~ /~...i a r- ~ /..rec.-~--~z.~ a S~<a b ~- ~i~_ located '= in the ~'~~'f~•-=s° Magisterial District. --R~~-c~r^r~.-ng--h~a-s-~ ~~e°rr-- f-e~u~st~-~cr -.-_..-_ The County Planning Commission recommends ~.<• - _ •- . ` " _ ;!_--. A copy of the~Zoni'ng Ordinance of Roanoke County and amendments thereto as well as a copy of the petition, site plan, and other documents related to this request may be examined in the office of the Department of Planning and Zoning, located in Room 600 of the Roanoke County Administration Center. Roanoke County will provide assistance to handicapped persons desiring to attend public hearings. Such individuals are requested to contact the County office of Personnel Services ([7031 772-2018) if special provisions are necessary for attendance. Given under my hand this day of - 1988• Please publish in the evening edition of the Roanoke Times and World News on: Tuesday, Tuesday , .~ ' ~~ ~ ~`~ `f Direct the bill for Publication to: F~ e r S f Ct ! l- . D R A F T L E G A L N O T I C E Notice is hereby given to all interested persons that the .Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at their eve Bing session beginning at 7:00 p.m. on Tuesday, t-ebrNa.rk 28 198'3., in the Community Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, S.W., Roanoke, Virginia, on the petition of ~e,~LAS (-(owteS rC-i~SC ~~fo~J SC ~SSi ~i CoM~~1y requesting rezoning from l2 E 2es;c.~e~J ~-ia.l ~s~a-tes to l~-Z , ~n1ef~_ ~^~•ys{r~ °'•~ of a tract containing 3.75 ~~-(es and located Q.t -~ e ~oRlnea.s f eo (ni er o~ -~.~ ~ ~ ~Gr s eefi on) ~ ~ !(o'l~ S t•tee t Q ~ ~(,;S~e. I~Je.,.fu,e in the int}'orS Magisterial District. Rezoning has been requested to eX aaNd '~ e-?C-~5{-in)q Cp~C(e~e, ~~od~e:{'~o~1 TRCi~~t• tifo('tIn a~ ~~ ~~~e The County Planning Commission recommends G~~AroclG-l ~Ji'~ tble `~~®~e,~ C'!an1~i'~'ien1S• A copy of the Zoning Ordinance of Roanoke County and amendments thereto as well as a copy of the petition, site plan, and other documents related to this request may be examined in the office of the Department of Planning and Zoning, located in Room 600 of the Roanoke County Administration Center. Roanoke County will provide assistance to handicapped persons desiring to attend public hearings. Such individuals are requested to contact the County office of Personnel Services ([703] 772-2018) if special provisions are necessary for attendance. 8 ~` da ~ ~~ 19 8 8 . Given under my hand this y of ~i Please publish in the evening edition of the Roanoke Times and world News on: Tuesday, ~j/ue/y ~'~, 1989 Tuesday, t"Gb/~cQ/'7 Zi ~98~ Direct the bill for Publication to: ~~e.l~...rc~ I~; ~l et ~~ °~ ~.C „Ja..te(s Win! ~ N ee~ i ~ S`3 Co I~O..r f i o ( ~('i t e. SQ.L~ ~ V ~ Z.~{ l 5 3 CZo~~ 3 80 - Z~,~~ D R A F T L E G A L N O T I C E Notice is hereby given to all interested persons that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at their even99ing session beginning at 7:00 p.m. on Tuesday, rErJ'Ru~.R`( ~ 7-~ 198b~, in the Community Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, S.W., Roanoke,' Virginia, on the petition of S £~NARD ~-oNNER _ requesting rezoning from $-'- ocpict ~-~ Q-1 RES-VENTU~ to C3-L Gt~-E~4L. c.vMN\i~LUL~t- of a tract containing 1 Z pc.,~FS and located eN -~-~,~ ~o~xTH S~J~E o~ PETEcZS cR~~-c R~~~Z~o fEET v~ES~ ~~ STS iN'~SFCnoN wmi ~~µ ~W~ in the Flot.>_1~.15 Magisterial District. Rezoning has been requested to CA~ISTRNGT ANA o~RO„TE A RESt"4ur~aty . The County Planning Commissiot recommends p~pRtrlAt w trtl P~ZoFr:ER><.~ coNV-TIa.15 . A copy of the Zoning Ordinance of Roanoke County and amendments thereto as well as a copy of the petition, site plan, and other documents related to this request may be examined in the office of the Department of Planning and Zoning, located in Room 600 of the Roanoke County Administration Center. Roanoke County will provide assistance to handicapped persons desiring to attend public hearings. Such individuals are requested to contact the County office of Personnel Services ([703] 772-2018) if special provisions are necessary for attendance. Given under my hand this day of , 1988• Please publish in the evening edition of the Roanoke Times and World News on: Tuesday, Fe9Ru4tt~( 14~ 1°1$q Tuesday , ~~~3Q.uAR`( Z1 191 Direct the bill for Publication to: S E1~wAR~ C._~+NF2 Cp~t'i"I fj~7lcJGLAND M\LL iZcA~} 1J~ . R.a~KE _ ~/~ Z~Iq 3~~ -'"~"r~iZ ~ 3cd.- 63`14 D R A F T L E G A L N O T I C E Notice is hereby given to all interested persons that the Roanoke County .Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at their evening session beginning at 7:00 p.m. on Tuesday, (~ou.rl~ a-~ 198'x, in the Community Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, S.W., Roanoke, Virginia, on the petition of ~~~ Co1rh+~ ~~ ~ ~c 'su~t.5 requesting rezoning from YYl 'I I~~4-,-I-S.-,b~~~~ to 3-/ Cor,~~ of a tract containing / ~ ~ ~P~ , /and 1 o c a t e d ct~ ~. - ~ riD1''~j~~ C0~ RN C o ~ ~~0~/Yv~~l ~~m^ d n~~ ~c~,l~l ~ ~. ~o-t-G ~ ~, in the .c~rP rt~T Magisterial District. Rezoning has been requested to ~Oti^~~-~N+ A C1~u~ ~( ~~lnG ~ieSGU~J411G~~ 1no. __ The County Planning Commission recommends Ocpnt-~nt.~ A copy of the Zoning Ordinance of Roanoke County and amendments thereto as well as a copy of the petition, site plan, and other documents related to this request may be examined in the office of the Department of Planning and Zoning, located in Room 600 of the Roanoke County Administration Center. Roanoke County will provide assistance to handicapped persons desiring to attend public hearings. Such individuals are requested to contact the County office of Personnel Services ([703] 772-2018) if special provisions are necessary for attendance. Given under my hand this day of Please publish in the evening edition of the Roanoke Times and World News on: 1988. Tuesday, rr~i~Dl"11d/Lf~ I~~ lQ~~_ Tuesday, 1"G~jU'II.LtGf o2 ~ lg~g Direct the bill for Publication to: 1~id~rD~~ ~~• ~~~ ~ vYSO r'~ ~ d ~x a9gda ~c~n0~~ 1/~1 ayD~~S - a~98 D R A F T L E G A L N O T I C E Notice is here'r~y given to all interested persons that the Roanoke County-Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at their evening session beginning at 7:00 p.m. on Tuesday, f'"G~rua~Gf Z~ 198, in the Community Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 3738 Brambleton-rA-venue, S.W., Roanoke, Virginia, on the petition of Cep+r~l ridcl~t ~~N ~ requesting rezoning from3-2a,-Jd B-3 •U~.~intess to ~f3-L B~~~ss of a tract containing I• oZ ac-res and located a~ ~11~ 3 ~r'a-~ ~e-L~~- t~o~ in the ~-~G 5'~r~+Jq Magisterial District. -~ Rezoning has been requested to Ca~JS~rc~.~-~' 0.' `f'~n.~ ( Se,r YoCe f~N ~. The County Planning Commission recommends. ~.Q~(Jro~(G.-I vJ~f~- ~e 'I~o~e(cc~ Co R1c<<~ian) S. A copy of the Zoning Ordinance of Roanoke County and amendments thereto as well as a copy of the petition, site plan, and other documents related to this request may be examined in the office of the Department of Planning and Zoning, located in Room 600 of the Roanoke County Administration Center. Roanoke County will provide assistance to handicapped persons desiring to attend public hearings. Such individuals are requested to contact the County office of Personnel Services ([703] 772-2018) if special provisions are necessary for attendance. Given under my hand this ~ day of ~~~~.Q-r~l 1988. Please publish in the evening edition of the Roanoke Times and World News on: Tuesda ~e ~ /w r ~'~ X989 Tuesday, ~e~~µQOTZ~~ ~`~~~ Direct the bill for Publication to: ~~.~~~ ~ c a~ ~ ben f' a z e a~ ~ l(v S~wt~ C.' t.leq<.. ~.Je~r...e ~,l eta. , v ~ Z. ~f ! S 3 (7a 3~ ~ 8 4 - ? ~-~3 D R A F T L E G A L N O T I C E Notice is hereby given to all interested persons that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at their evening session beginning at 7:00 p.m. on Tuesday, ~~ y,~'r~~r1~1oC~'~/ , 198, in the Community Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, S.W., Roanoke, Virginia, on the petition of ~~~~ , ~ ~1,~.r~r requesting rezoning from ~ ~.<.:,- _. l t'•.~T.-, of a tract containing s OS~ ~'~=~~~~ ~ and .located F 3~/ ~~~t_. ,~ ;~ ~'~o.. ~in the C:~~r~,,~~~-~- •~~`f~ Magisterial District. Rezoning has been requested to ~ ' :~ '`r" ='~ - %~, _t; r _ ' <_~,, f•-~`~-,-r'e>~ j <<,tj~i ~^ ,>,. -aThe County Planning Commission recommends ~ `., ~. ti' t, A copy of the Zoning Ordinance of Roanoke County and amendments thereto as well as a copy of the petition, site plan, and other documents related to this request may be examined in the office of the Department of Planning and Zoning, located in Room 600 of the Roanoke County Administration Center. Roanoke County will provide assistance to handicapped persons desiring to attend public hearings. Such individuals are requested to contact the County office of Personnel Services ([703] 772-2018) if special provisions are necessary for attendance. Given under my hand this day of Please publish in the evening edition of the Roanoke Times and World News on: 1988. Tuesday, ... M; _~ ~,-. ~ . Tue sday ,.~' ,.. ,. '. `~,'' Direct the bill for Publication to: F., ,~ C ~,~, ;~ ~,~ ..: ~> i ;.~ if:-,, •, ~~ _ , _ ~,3 D R A F T L E G A L N O T I C E Notice is hereby given to all interested persons that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at their evening session beginning at 7:00 p.m. on Tuesday, - , ~~Y,q -, in the Community Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, S.W., Roanoke, Virginia, on the petition of ~ , '; ~-'~ • requesting A~h~ ~rt '~Rcu,Dc.~ ~cR to e~. ~va~ 4 C~-t- KE~v~1c L ill QD9 ~t ion aca. ~ '2z~~ ann. r of a tract containing S. ~~S 1~C~~5 and located 5.6~-(~ L6WL/-~~1~ LA 1~C in the ~tQJ~ ~p<~ Nh Magisterial District. PPn recri,P~i-P~3 to -_--- J ----- T ing recommends ~YQ~ooa~ ~~ ~ ~tt(M~t'. A copy of the Zoning Ordinance of Roanoke County and amendments thereto as well as a copy of the petition, site plan, and other documents related to this request may be examined in the office of the Department of Planning and Zoning, located in Room 600 of the Roanoke County Administration Center. Roanoke County will provide assistance to handicapped persons desiring to attend public hearings. Such individuals are requested to contact the County office of Personnel Services ([703J 772-2018) if special provisions are necessary for attendance. Given under my hand this day of Please publish in the evening edition of the Roanoke Times and World News on: 1988. Tuesday, Z - 1~ - ~5~. Tuesday, 2. 2 ~ - ~9 Direct the bill for Publication to: W i It 1 OM 4 CA~~nrt,r~ N c Fo 2~ ~.1 L ~'Lo17 Go~..~G~k-D CA~t ANd C~ Z 0 /~ Q~ g - ~ 'Zoo D R A F T L E G A L N O T I C E Notice is hereby given to all interested persons that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at their evening session beginning at 7:00 p.m. on Tuesday, ~Ru~rZK 5~ Z$ 198`, in the Community Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, S.W., Roanoke, Virginia, on the petition of ~. ~,,, wv~.rz A~ R N C3~ZA~~~e~ requesting rezoning from ~_~ i~~i~~~oL to R-3 iZ~StDENT1a-L of a tract containing Z.`IZ. ~~~zs5 and located A.-r ~y{o-.~ c~-p,~a.RR~~.. ~ 2~ YE - -- in the ~a./C `>?R~Mt~ Magisterial District. Rezoning has been requested to ~-o~v5~~.t~-T M~ILTI - FAM~t-Y ~E51i~ ~~~~ The County Planning Commi ssioi recommends pENtAL Wc~ PRAFF~+ZE;~ ccNnt~na~l5• A copy of the Zoning Ordinance of Roanoke County and amendments thereto as well as a copy of the petition, site plan, and other documents related to this request may be examined in the office of the Department of Planning and Zoning, located in Room 600 of the Roanoke County Administration Center. Roanoke County will provide assistance to handicapped persons desiring to attend public hearings. Such individuals are requested to contact the County office of Personnel Services ([703] 772-2018) if special provisions are necessary for attendance. Given under my hand this day of Please publish in the evening edition of the Roanoke Times and World News on: Tuesday, F~K~WaC.~{ 1~ ~ 19~ 1988. Tuesday, YEPJGC~.l4~Y ZI ~ «~ Direct the bill for Publication to: T, L . we~TZ. 5Z~1 ~~~~~t~at,C 1..~4Nt , S W . ~~No~ , va ~o~~ ~~~- S2cQ3 D R A F T L E G A L N O T I C E Notice is hereby given to all. interested persons that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at their evening session beginning at 7:00 p.m. on Tuesday, I'~QnC~n r,2.~ , 198, in the Community Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, S.W., Roanoke, Virginia, on the petition of ~,~naP.r'-~~1~ .br~I~e.~f Co~~~~~~ r/equesting re zo~ng from C~1 -~ ~ Tnr~ uS~-iCC~ to frl -) } ~ -a h-~' n~-~t-IC~. un~. a. Jpc ~XCe~o~n~~c~~}' hoc rtle,~Cet~ co~mm~~~"`'~ ~o~ a tract containing and ~ ~-G fi a.~ rr s located ~ ~P nnr~n ~,~~P~ ~~ -~nw~ot-~n. {Zou,t~ IUD ~~x,`~' ure~~' o~ i`~"s i~-~e~sec'~-t~ ~~~~-~~~sC~e~~oa~in the ~~,I~nS Magisterial District. Rezoning has been requested to ~nC.ot'~cPro~"P. `~-s ~anr,p< ~-~'Eo VcA,~,~c.,vo-tn~-e ~an,k The County Planning Commissior recommends 0.p~4pVa~ A copy of the Zoning Ordinance of Roanoke County and amendments thereto as well as a copy of the petition, site plan, and other documents related to this request may be examined in the office of the Department of Planning and Zoning, located in Room 600 of the Roanoke County Administration Center. Roanoke County will provide assistance to handicapped persons desiring to attend public hearings. Such individuals are requested to contact the County office of Personnel Services ([7031 772-2018) if special provisions are necessary for attendance. Given under my hand this day of Please publish in the evening edition of the Roanoke Times and World News or.: 1988. Tuesday, f~rvatt~ ~~1~ /~j~q Tuesday, ~~{~p-~,YN o?~ 14~c/ Direct the bill for Publication to: /~~r,~ael ~. S,nP_ h~l~r ~~_ Sao ~ouno k ~ , /f~ ~ yDQ 5~ - 6 ~-~ D VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKF COUNTY A 2.768 acre parcel of land, ) generally located on the ) northwesterly side of Kenworth ) Road within the Hollins Magis- ) terial District, and recorded ) as part of Parcel No. 37.07-1-6) in the Roanoke County Tax ) Records. ) RECOMMENDATION TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY: WHEREAS, your Petitioner, Lingerfelt Development Corporation, a Virginia corporation, has filed with the Secretary to the Planning Commission a Petition to rezone the above-referenced parcel of land from M-2 District to M-1 District f.or the purpose of a Mixed Use (Light Industrial) Park. WHEREAS, the Petition was referred to the Planning Commission which, after due legal notice as required by Section 15.1-431 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended, did hold a public hearing on February 7, 1989; and WHEREAS, at that public hearing all parties in interest were afforded an opportunity to be heard; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due consideration, has recommended to the Board of County Supervisors that the rezoning be approved., with proffered conditions. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission recommends to the Board of County Supervisors that the above-referenced parcel of land be rezoned from M-2 (General Industrial) to M-1 (Light Industrial). The above action was adopted on motion of Ron P~lassey and upon the folloiaing recorded vote: AYES: Gordon, Robinson, Massey, Winstead, Witt NAYS : None ABSENT : None Respectfully su fitted, Sec'retar~ Roanoke~County Planning Commission VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY A 'S6 acre parcel of land, ) generally located at rear of ) 3639 Brambleton Avenue ) within the Windsor Hills ) Magisterial District, and ) recorded as parcel # 77.09-4-47 ) in the Roanoke County Tax Records. TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUN'T'Y: William Maas WHEREAS, your Petitioner has filed with the Secretary to the Planning Commission a petition to rezone the above-referenced parcel of land from M-1 Conditional District to M-1 Conditional (amendment District for the purpose of assembling f couditi ns) wooden playground equipmeng WHEREAS, the petition was referred to the Planning Commission which, after due legal notice as required by Section 15.1-431 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended, did hold a public hearing on February 7 ~ 19 89 and WHEREAS, at that public hearing all parties in interest were afforded an ooportunity to be heard; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due consideration has recommended to the Board of County Supervisors that the rezoning be approved with proffered conditions NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission recommends to the Board of County Supervisors that the above-referenced parcel of land be rezoned from M-1 conditional to M-1 conditional (amendment of conditions) The above action was adopted on motion of Gordon and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Gordon, Robinson, Massey, Winstead, Witt NAYS: None ABSENT: None Respec ly su tt d, Sec etar , R a e County P1 nning Commission I VIRGINIA: BEE'ORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY A 2 • 9 2 acre parcel of land, generally located P o f f L a n e & Chaparral Drive within the C a v e S p r i n g ) RECONA~IENDATION Magisterial District, and ) recorded as parcel # 8 7.10 - 3 - 5 ) in the Roanoke County Tax Records. ) Ta THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY; WHEREAS, your Petitionezs J. L° , W o l t z & R. fJ . B r a d l e y has filed with the Secretary to the Planning Commission a petition to rezone the above-referenced parcel of land fran Residential R-1 District to R e s i d e n t i a l R -3 District for the purpose of M u l t i- f a m i l y h o u s i n g WHEREAS, the petition was referred to the Planning Commission which, after due legal notice as required by Section 15.1-431 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended, did hold a public hearing on FPhrtiary 7 19 89 and WHEREAS, at that public hearing all parties in interest were afforded an opportunity to be heard; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due consideration has reccxYUt~ended to the Board of County Supervisors that the rezoning be Denied with proffered conditions. - NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission recommends to the Board of County Supervisors that the above-referenced parcel of land not be rezoned from Residential n,-1 to Residential R•-3 The above action was adopted on motion of following recorded vote: Mr. Witt and upon the AYES: Gordon, Robinson, Massey, Winstead, Witt NAYS: None ABS~. Respectfully subm~i~t ed, ' None ~ i~~-- ... __,r~..r ..« _ Secretary Roanoke County Planning Commission 4 VIRGINIA: BEE'ORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY A 1 .2 acre parcel of land, ) generally located 6 4 0 9 Peter s ) Creek Road N.W. ) within the Hollins Magisterial District, and REC)QMNIENDATION recorded as parcel # 27.13-5 ) Lots 8-1~. and 30-34 ) in the Roanoke County Tax Records. ) Ta THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY: WHEREAS,. your Petitioner J Edward Conn r has filed with the Secretary to the Planning Commission a petition to rezone the above-referenced parcel of land from B-1 and R-1 District to B-2 District for the purpose of Constructing and Operating a Sandwich Restaurant WHEREAS, the petition was referred to the Planning Corission which, after due legal notice as required by Section 15.1-431 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended, did hold a public hearing on February 7 , 19 89 and WHEREAS, at that public hearing all parties in interest were afforded an opportunity to be heard; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due consideration has recomrended to the Board of County Supervisors that the rezoning be Approved with proffered conditions. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Co~anission recommends to the Board of County Supervisors that the above-referenced parcel of land be rezoned from Office B-1 and Residential R-1 to General Commercial B-2 The above action was adopted on motion of Mr. Massey and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Gordon, Robinson, Massey, Winstead, Witt NAYS: None ABSENT: None Respect llyysubmitted, Secret y Roano~ounty Planning Commission VIRGINIA: Bffi~RE THE BOARD OF SUPERVI SOBS ~ ROANOKE OOUI~TPY A 0.75+ acre parcel of land, ) generally located southeast corner ) Brambleton Ave. and Valley Forge Ave.) within the Cave Springy ) ~TION Magisterial District, and ) recorded as parcel # 77.13-3-3 & -4 ) in the Roanoke County Tax Records. TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COiJN'!'Y WHEREAS, your Petitioner Roanoke County Board of Supervisors has filed with the Secretary to the Planning Commission a petition to rezone the above-referenced parcel of land from M-1 Light Industrial District to B-1 District for the purpose of Rescue Squad Facility WHEREAS, the petition was referred to the Planning Commission which, after due legal notice as required by Section 15.1-431 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended, did hold a public hearing on February 7, , 19 89 ;and WHEREAS, at that public hearing all parties in interest were afforded an opportunity to be heard; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due consideration has recannended to the Board of County Supervisors that the rezoning be approved with proffered conditions NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission recorm~ends to the Board of County Supervisors that the above-referenced parcel of land be rezoned to B-1 District The above action was adopted on motion of Don Witt and upon the following recorded vote: Aye; Gordon, Robinson, l~ssey, Winstead, Witt NAYS. None ABSEI~fr: None Respectf ly submit ed, ~~ Secr tary Roa~io e ounty Planning Commission VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY A x'45 acre parcel of land, ) generally located at 5647 > Lowland Lane, S.W. ) ._ ) within the Cave Spring Magisterial District, and ) recorded as parcel # ~ 96. o ~ ' i - 2 ~ ~-k in the Roanoke County Tax Records. ) TO THE HONQRABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY: WHEREAS, your Petitioner William E. Fortune and Catherine G. Fortune has filed with the Secretary to the Planning Commission a petition to request a "Use Not Provided For" permit for the above referenced parcel of land for the purpose of development of a dog and cat boarding facility WHEREAS, the petition was referred to the Planning Commission which, after due legal notice as required by Section 15.1-431 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended, did hold a public hearing on Februarv 7 , 19 g2; and WHEREAS, at that public hearing all parties in interest were afforded an opportunity to be heard; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due consideration has recatmended to the Board of County Supervisors that the request be _ rranrP~l T.~; rh proffered conditions NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission rec.`a[mends to the Board of County Supervisors that the above-referenced parcel of land Be granted a Use Not Provided For Permit The above action was adopted on motion of Mr. Witt following recorded vote: p'er' Witt, Massey, Robinson ~YS' In~instead, Gordon ABSENT: None REGONY~IENDATION and upon the Respectf ly submit ,~ Secretary, oanoke Co ty Planning Commission VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUN'T'Y A 0. 7 9 5 acre parcel of land, ) generally located on U.S. Route 220 ) @ Valley .Street ) within the Cave Spring ) RF7CONY~IELVDATION Magisterial District, and ) recorded as parcel. # 77.20-1-40 ) in the Roanoke County Tax Records. ) ~ THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY: WHEREAS, your Petitioner Central Fidelity Bank, Inc. has filed with the Secretary to the Planning Commission a, petition to rezone the above-referenced parcel of land fran B-3 Special Commercial District to ~_2 n a1 ommer ia1 District for the purpose of operating a branch bank. WHEREAS, the petition was referred to the Planning Comiission which, after due legal notice as required by Section 15.1-431 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended, did hold a public hearing on fieloFvcArN 7 19 8~ ; and WHEREAS, at that public hearin all I g parties in interest were afforded an opportunity to be heard; and ' WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due consideration has rec-oRUrended to the Board of County Supervisors that the rezoning be Q..pp/e~e~1 ~};-(~i ~.c. !'~~o e(ee~ CCO/~~fiDn1S NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Cottanission reccR¢rnnds to the Board of County Supervisors that the above-referenced tercel of land .jQe ~e~~Nec~ le w~. 13 ~ 2 ct,,~ c~ 13 - 3 ~ B ~s ~ -~ e ss -(~ a - Z ~ (~ug-; nl e s S The above action was adopted on motion of 1~,~ ~~~" and upon the following recorded vote: AYES : ofd 0 ~ ~ t~-o 4D r NS'p ~ ~ lA/~a SS 2 ~ W r N T T ~°C~ ~ /~ ~ T~ NAYS : /~G~~~~ ABSENT: ~~~?"/rf Respectfully submitted, Secr` etar ~~ Roano`k.~ County Planning Commission VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY A 3. 7 4 acre parcel of land, generally located adjoining Riverland Terrace within the Vinton Magisterial District, and recorded as parcel # 7 0.11-1- 2 2 and 70.11-1-21 in the Roanoke County Tax Records. ~ RECONP~IDATION ~ THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY: WHEREAS, your Petitioner Stephen C. Rossi and Beth Ann Rossi, husband and wife, formerly Fekas omes, nc., has filed with the Secretary to the Planning Commission a petition to rezone the above-referenced parcel of land frccn RE, Residential Estates District to Nit, Manufacturing District for the purpose of manufacturing use. WHEREAS, the petition was referred to the Planning Commission which, after due legal notice as required by Section 15.1-431 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended, did hold a public hearing on January 7 19 89 ;and WHEREAS, at that public hearing all parties in interest were afforded an opportunity to be heard; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due consideration has rec'anmended to the Board of County Supervisors that the rezoning be approved with proffered conditions NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning C~nnission recommends to the Board of County Supervisors that the above-referenced parcel of land be rezoned from RE, Residential District to M2, Manufacturing District The above action was adopted on motion of ~binlSorJ and upon the following recorded vote: AYES : Go ~d on1, ~ ~p r nt So ~J NAYS: None Nta ss ey, t,J ~ ~sfecic(, U1; t~f ABS~; Respectfully submitted, None ~~ Secreta Roanoke County Planning Commission i~ ~ .. n ~ X1,1 ~ ~~ ~ ~ b- b`• ~ ] ~ ~~ m ~ .J ~U .~- ~• O J 3 C :i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ t~ ~" fD r~r G ~ ~ F"' ~ +'i CZ A~ rr r• r-t ~~ W lp N 017 W OD ~o f'r . ~ IP r'F-'O F+. lfl W ~ ~ ~ C'r l0 ~ (D ~ fD I--~ '~ ~ m ~• a o `° ~' ~ rt ~, ~ ~ n rr p, ~ w ~• ~• x ~' ~ rt w ~- ~ort '~ ~* x ~ ~' ~•~ ~ m ~ ~ro ~ ~o ~ ~~ ~ ~m°n ~ ~' w rt~ ~ ~ ~ ~ • ~~ 0 N I•-~ w awl ~~r~r~_,~~: ~~ ~~,-~_ ~1- ~` F 4= r ;, ~ ,, ~ , r ~ ~ ~E~ / i , _, > ,, I. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS SUPERVISOR JOHNSON: (1) MOTION, SECONDED BY ROBERS TO DIRECT PAUL MAHONEY TO BRING BACK TO THE BOARD A DRAFT ANTI-CRUISE ORDINANCE - UNANIMOUS ROLL CALL VOTE (2) ASKED THE CHAIRMAN TO APPOINT TIM GUBALA TO THE CONVENTION & VISITORS BUREAU; (3) ASK FOR A REPORT ON THE STATUS OF THE 75/25 PROGRAM. ECH WILL BRING BACK TO BOARD ON 3/14/88; (4) REQUESTED RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION TO ART WHITAKER WHO HAS BEEN WITH PIEDMONT AIRLINES FOR 41 YEARS AND INVITE HIM TO MEETING TO RECEIVE RESO; (5) ~ ~ REQUESTED THAT COPIES OF THE HISTORY BOOK AND SESQUICENTENNIAL COIN BE GIVEN TO THE STATE LEGISLATORS, GOV., LT. GOV, ATTORNEY GENERAL, SENATORS AND CONGRESSMEN. FUNDING TO COME FROM BOARD CONTINGENCY FUND. SUPERVISOR ROBERS: (1) REPORTED THAT THE VALLEY COOPERATION COMMITTEE IS WORKING WITH THE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE TO INVITE PEOPLE FROM NORTHERN VA. TO THE ROANOKE VALLEY; (2) REQUESTED THAT STAFF INVESTIGATE WITH NORTHCROSS SCHOOL THE POSSIBILITY OF A HIGHWAY MARKER ACKNOWLEDGING THEIR STATE CHAMPIONSHIP BASKETBALL TEAM. SUPERVISOR MCGRAW: EXPRESSED APPRECIATION TO ROANOKE CITY COUNCILMAN DAVID BOWERS FOR HIS ACTIONS DONE IN THE THE INTEREST OF THE ROANOKE VALLEY. SUPERVISOR GARRETT: DIRECTED ECH TO CHECK OUT THE HANDICAPPED RAMP ENTRANCE AT THE HEADQUARTERS LIBRARY TO SEE IF IT IS A WORKABLE ENTRANCE FOR THE HANDICAPPED. J. CONSENT AGENDA ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY. R-12489-4 BLJ/HCN TO APPROVE - UW 1. Confirmation of appointment to the Community Corrections Policy Board. A-12489-4.a 2. Acceptance of water and sewer facilities serving Canterbury Park Section 3. 3 HCN/SAM TO ADOPT ORD URC I. APPOINTMENTS 1. Court Corrections Resources Board. 2. League of Older Americans 3. Transportation and Safety Commission . 4. Court Service Unit Advisory Council/Youth and ~c~~.~_m~c,~'-ie-~ Family Services Advisory Board. BLJ NOMINATED GARY MINTER J. REPORTS: AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS SiTPERVISOR JOHNSON ANNOUNCED THAT THE REGIONAL AIRPORT COMMISSION BUDGET WILL BE PRESENTED TO THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS. NO ADDITIONAL REQUESTS ARE BEING MADE. SUPERVISOR ROBERS (1) ADVISED THERE WILL BE A MEETING ON 3/2/89 WITH CITIZENS ON COLONIAL AVENUE TO EXPRESS CONCERNS ABOUT THE ROAD (2) PLANS ARE UNDERWAY FOR VICE PRESIDENT OF GEORGE MASON UNIV. TO VISIT THE ROANOKE VALLEY FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PURPOSES AND BUSINESSES FROM NORTHERN VA. WILL ATTEND ALSO. K. CONSENT AGENDA ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY. R-21489-12 HCN/BKJ TO APPROVE RESO URC 1. Confirmation of committee appointments to the Library Board and Court Service Unit Advisory Council/Youth and Family Services Advisory Board. A-21489-12.a 2. Acknowledgment from Va. Department of Transportation that the following roads have been accepted into the Secondary System: 4 „~ COMMITTEE VACANCIES IN 1989 JA~AR Y Court~Service Unit Advisor Council/Youth and Famil Services Advisor Board Two year term of Hoyt C. Rath, Vinton District, will expire 1/26/g9, FEB~ARY Electoral Board - A ointed b the Courts Three year term of Mrs. M 2/28/89, aY Johnson will expire MAR CFi Court Service Unit Advisor Council/Youth and Famil Services Advisor Board Two year terms of James L. Red R. Powell Trout, Cave Spring District, Sanders, WindsoraHillsrDistDict,lwillaex James K. pare 3/22/89, Lea ue of Older Americans One year term of Webb Johnson, County Representative will expire 3/31/89. JUNE Board of Zoninc ~/~i~ vL i {.. ~~ is - Appointed by Judge of c'; rcuit Five Year term of Neil W. Owen will expire 6/30/89. Fifth Plannin District Commission Three year terms of Richard W, and John Hubbard Robers, Fred Anderson Committee will 'p Citi6%30R89resentative and Executive ex ire / Parks & Recreation Advisor Commission Three year terms of Vince Jo Alice Gillespie, Hollins District Cave Sprinq District, Robertson, Vinton District, will expirdeT6/30/89. SEPTEMBER Court Service Unit Advisor Services Advisor Council/Youth and Famil Board Youth Members from Cave Sprin High and Northside High Schoo~s tolbeaa B rd Y Glenvar Industrial Develo ment PPointed. Authorit Four year terms of Bill District, and W. Y H• Branch, Cave Spring Darnall Vinyard, Vinton District will expire 9/26/89. Grievance Panel Two year term of Kim Owens will expire 9/27/89. NOV- E- MBER Health De artment Board of Directors Two Year term of Susan Adcock will eXpires 11 26 / /89. DEC- E-~ R Librarv Board Four year term of Richard Kirkwood will expire 12/21/gg. Mr, Kirkwood resignedD12trict, Mental Health Services /88. Services Board of the Roanoke Valle Communit expireY12/31j89•of Sue Ivey, County appointee, wi 11 Roanoke Count Plannin Commission Four year term of W will eXpire 12 31 aYland Winstead, Catawba District, / /89. Re Tonal Partnershi Site Advisor Committee Three year term of Charles Saul will expire 12 2 / 1/89. 2 - r ~ J ~~ _ 7 7y- 3 ~ yy ~.~ _,.. .. ,- .~_ _ ~, - .. -~ o ,,l Y [ f `~ .X" w any R-21489-13 '"~- ''"' HCN/SAM TO APPROV. ~"'~ '~' ~ +. ``,~ ,`~..~-°~,--„pC,.,,J~ URC i~~~ N. WORK SESSIONS 1. 1989-90 Budget a ~~ 8 BLJ REQUESTED A REPORT BE BROUGHT BACK ON WHEN E911 TAx WILL BE DROPPED 2. Landfill Siting 3. Recycling Evaluation LG SUGGESTED THAT STAFF MEET WITH OTHER LOCALITIES AND LANDFILL BOARD TO COME UP WITH AGREEMENT ON RECYCLING BETWEEN ALL LOCALITIES 4. Rural Addition Priority List A-21489-14 HCN/SAM TO APPROVE RURAL ADDITION PRIORITY LIST URC NONE 0- CITIZEN COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS 1• B• K. Cruey, representing the Clearbrook Civic League, to speak concerning Landfill Site 44 (Red Hill site) 2- KELLY WHITNEY, CLEAN VALLEY COUNCIL SPOKE CONCERNING CONTINUED EXPANSION OF THE RECYCLING PROGRAM. 3- CRAIG GOULD, 6433 CROWELL GAP ROAD, SPOKE IN OPPOSITION TO THE RED HILL LANDFILL SITE. P. EXECUTIVE SESSION pursuant to the Code of Virginia Section 2.1-344 (a) 4. ADJOURNMENT SAM/HCN AT 6:50 P.M. UVV 6 ~t~; ~0 ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA FEBRUARY 28, 1989 Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meeting, Regular meetings are held on the second Tuesday and the fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public Hearings will be heard at 7:00 p.m on the fourth Tuesday of each month, Deviations from this schedule will be announced. A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.) 1. Roll Call. 2. Invocation: The Reverend Louis E. Carson Cave Spring United Methodist Church 3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag. B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS. C. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS AND AWARDS 1. Resolution of Appreciation to Art Whittaker upon his retirement from Piedmont Airlines D. NEW BUSINESS 1. Presentation from the Citizens for Governmental Excellence of petitions for the proposed consolidation of Roanoke County and Roanoke City. 2. Approval of 1989-90 Regional Airport Commission Budget. 3. Request from the Registrar for an appropriation of funds for t~~~-~~e~H~~...Primary . ~ G r~ G'~'~` v~ wg r 3. Adoption of Resolution of Appreciation to the Honorable Jack B. Coulter, Judge of the 23rd Judicial Circuit. 4. Authorization to grant 40' easement to Appalachian Power Company. 5. Acceptance of a 10-foot water line easement being dedicated by Dominion Bank. 6. Request for acceptance of Huntridge Road and Britany Road in the Va. Department of Transportation Secondary System. 7. Request for acceptance of Kildeer circle and Falcon Ridge Road into the Va. Department of Transportation Secondary System. g. Acceptance of water and sewer facilities serving Section No. 2, Huntridge g. Acknowledgment from the Virginia Department of Transportation that the following roads have been accepted into the Secondary System: 0.11 a miles of Fox Ridge Road . b, 0.40 miles of Peregrine Crest Circle c, 0.25 miles of Fox Ridge Road d. 0.15 miles of Silver Fox Road ~l 10.1 Awar _of-Bid for $9 Million revenue Anticipation ~~~ Notes . 1~. Acceptance of sewer facilities serving White Subdivision. 1~. Acceptance of a sanitary sewer easement being donated by Velma G. Edwards. J. CITIZENS' CONlr~NTS AND COMMUNICATIONS r/ 1. Karen Sumner to address proposed building and ~Z`~~~ ~ ~~ safety concerns at Winterberry Pointe. ~` i1 ~' 2. Melvin T. Patrick to address safety concerns within Winterberry Pointe. K. REPORTS 1. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance 3 2• General Fund Unappropriated Balance 3 ~ Board Contingency Fund 4, Accounts Paid - January 1989 5, Income Analysis1989•Statement of Expenditures as of January 31, I,, WORK SESSIONS `1, Joint Work Session with Parks and Recreation `~~ Advisory Commission. -~ M• EXECUTIVE SESSION pursuant to the Code of Virginia Section 2.1-344 EVENING SESSION (7 • 00 P~_ N, NEW BUSINESS (CONTINUED FROM 3:00 P.M.) 1• Final recommendations on Proposed Landfill Sites. ON FEBRUARY 14, 1989) O, PUBLIC HEARINGS (289-1 WAS HEARD Petition of J L Woltz and R. N. Bradle to rezone a 289-2 Residential to R-3, 2.92 acre tract from R-1, Residential to construct multifamily residencering located at 3464 Chaparral Drive in the Cave Sp Magisterial District. 289-3 Petition of William and°ceratelaedograndecatrboardinq t Provided for Permit to p kennel in addition tond LanedincthenCave•Springe tract located at 5747 Lowla Magisterial District. roximate 289-4 Petition oract fdomrB-1°BusinessrandnR-1nRespdential to 1.2 acre t located on the B-2, Business to construct a rest280afeet week of its south side of Peters Creek Road, intersection with South Drive in the Hollins Magisterial District. _5 Petition of Central Fidelit Business•tooBr2zBusiness02 289 acre tract from B-2 and B 3, 4 to construct a bank, locaaidDastrict.Franklin Road in the Cave Spring Maglster Petition of Fekas Homes, Inc. to rezone a 3.75 acre 289-6 Residential Estates to M-1, Industrial, tract from RE, located at the northeale Avenue in the Vintonection o 16th Street and Carlis Magisterial District. Petition of William Maas to amend the proffered 289-7 1987 on a 0.56 acre tract conditions dated Novemband1se11 wooden playground to construct, assembly equipment located at 3639 Brambleton Avenue in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District. 289-8 Petition of Lin erfelt Develo ment CIndustrial to M-1, rezone a 2.768 acre tract from M-2, Industrial and obtain a Special Excap~1OOf Valleypointe, related commercial uses to become p located on the north iodewo~hKPetershCreek Roadfentthe west of its intersect Hollins Magisterial District. 289-9 Petition of Roanoke Count Board ofIndustrialrto B-1, rezone a 1.03 acre tract from M-1, and for Business to construct a rescue squad building Planning Commission review of the compatibirehensive proposed rescue squad facility and the Comp Plan, located at the southeast cornringfMaga~terial and Valley Forge Avenues in the Cave Sp District. p, FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES Section 21-4 (a), Enhanced Emergencv 1, Ordinance amending Taxation, of the Roanoke Telephone Tax, of Chaphertax~on p ses of local County Code reducing Telephone telephone service to fund the E911 Emergency System. 2, Ordinance accepting an offer for and authorizing the sale and conveyance of surplus real estate - well lot on Route 633, Benois Road. 3, Ordinance authorizing the conveyance of a right-of-way and easement to Appalachian Power Company. and reenacting Section 21-151, Lev 4, Ordinance amending Code to provide of tax• amount of the Roanoke County remises for the taxation of food that is sold for off-p consumption. 5 Q, SECOND gEp,DING OF ORDINANCES g, CITIZENS' COML4ENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS S, ADJOURNMENT ~ ~~,~- ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA FEBRUARY 28, 1989 Regular Board of Supervisors meeting. at 3.00 Welcome to the Roanoke County and the fourth Tuesday - meetings are held on the second Tuesday m on the fourth Tuesday p,m, public Hearings will be heard at 7:00 p. of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. A, OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.) 1, Roll Call. 2, Invocation: The ReveingdUnited Methodist Church Cave Sp 3, Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag. g, REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS. C, PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS AND AWARDS 1, Resolution of Appreciation to Art Whittaker upon his retirement from Piedmont Airlines ~_--~-<---- - D, NEW BUSINESS 1, Presentation fre~itionslforethefproposednmental Excellence of p and Roanoke City. consolidation of Roanoke County 2, Approval of 1989-90 Regional Airport Commission Budget. 3, Request from the Registrar for an appropriation of funds for the Republican Primary. t initiate a sanitary sewer ro ec p j Authorization to hfields/Lakeland Road Area. i g for the H r project t for the thorization to e initiate a wa Au Old Hollins Road Area. e 13 19$9 • d C , .rescheduling of Jun 1989 mPPti~ _da_t 4 ~~ ~~ ~•~t ...., . ~..< ~ 6 ~~~ to meeting date , June 1 ~ E. BEQUEST FOR WORK SESSIONS F. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS G. APPOINTMENTS 1, Community Corrections Resources Board League of Older Americans Advisory Board 2. g, Transportation and Safety Commission Court Service Unit Advisory Council/Youth and 4. Services Advisory Board Family 2 g, REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS I, CONSENT AGENDA p~,I, MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE WILL BE CONSIDERED BY TFiE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND TED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN T D F THAT ITE WILLIBE D ENAC BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESI ~ WILL BE CONSIDERED REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND SEPARATELY. _~.._ ~.,,~,.. ~~6~._.... __...-...,....August r ~' 1989, Psugust --2~~r ~~-9~~~,r... ~--~9 ~ intment to the Court 2, Confirmation of CommitCouncpil/Youth and Family Service Unit Advisgoard Services Advisory . Approval of Raffle Permit for the Cave Spring 3 Jaycees. tion of Resolution of Appreciation to the 4, Adop Coulter, Judge of the 23rd Honorable Jack B• Judicial Circuit. alachian Authorization to grant 40' easement to App 5. Power Company. Acceptance of a 10-foot water line easement being 6• Dominion Bank dedicated by Request for acceptance of Huntridge Road and ~' Road in the Va. Department of Britany S stem. Transportation Secondary Y Request for acceptance of Kildeer circle and 8• e Road into the Va. Department of Falcon Ridg S stem. Transportation Secondary Y Acceptance of water and sewer facilities serving 9• Huntridge Section No. 2~ Acknowledgment from the Virginia Department of 10. roads have been Tansportation that the follosisgem: accepted into the Secondary Y a, 0.11 miles of Fox Ridge Road b. 0.40 miles of Foxe Ridge Road Circle c• 0.25 miles of 3 d, 0.15 miles of Silver Fox Road Award of Bid for S9 Million revenue Anticipation 11. Notes. White 12. Acceptance of sewer facilities serving Subdivision. Acceptance of a sanitary sewer easement being 13. Velma G. Edwards. donated by J, CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS Karen Sumner to address proposed building and 1. Pointe. safety concerns at Winterberry Patrick to address safety concerns 2, Melvin T• pointe. within Winterberry K, REPORTS 1. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance 2, General Fund Unappropriated Balance 3, Board Contingency Fund - January 1989 4, Accounts Paid enditures as 5, Income Analysis and Statement of Exp of January 31, 1989. L. WOgK SESSIONS 1, Joint Work Session With Parks and Recreation Advisory Commissio ~ ursuant to the Code of Virginia ~/ M, EXECUTIVE SESS P Section 2.1-3 EVENING SESSION (x'00 p'M' NEW BUSINESS ~ ~~ .. 0 J"`K^t ~ 4 ~,~ PUBLIC HEARINGS (289-1 WAS HEARD ON FEBRUARY 14, 1989) 289-2 Petition of J L Woltz and R N Bradley to rezone a 2.92 acre tract from R-1, Residential to R-3, Residential to construct multifamily residences, located at 3464 Chaparral Drive in the Cave Spring Magisterial District. 289-3 Petition of William and Catherine Fortune for a Use Not Provided for Permit to operate a dog and cat boarding kennel in addition to a residence on a 5.45 acre tract located at 5747 Lowland Lane in the Cave Spring Magisterial District. 289-4 Petition of J. Edward Conner to rezone an approximate 1.2 acre tract from B-1 Business and R-1 Residential to B-2, Business to construct a restaurant, located on the south side of Peters Creek Road, 280 feet week of its intersection with South Drive in the Hollins Magisterial District. 289-5 Petition of Central Fidelity Bank Inc. to rezone a 1.02 acre tract from B-2 and B-3, Business to B-2 Business to construct a bank, located at 4143 Franklin Road in the Cave Spring Magisterial District. 289-6 Petition of Fekas Homes, Inc. to rezone a 3.75 acre tract from RE, Residential Estates to M-1, Industrial, located at the northeast corner of the intersection of 16th Street and Carlisle Avenue in the Vinton Magisterial District. 289-7 Petition of William Maas to amend the proffered conditions dated November 17, 1987 on a 0.56 acre tract to construct, assembly and sell wooden playground equipment located at 3639 Brambleton Avenue in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District. 289-8 Petition of Lingerfelt Development Corporation to rezone a 2.768 acre tract from M-2, Industrial to M-1, Industrial and obtain a Special Exception Permit for related commercial uses to become part of Valleypointe, located on the north side of Kenworth Road 119 feet west of its intersection with Peters Creek Road in the Hollins Magisterial District. 289-9 Petition of Roanoke County Board of Supervisors to rezone a 1.03 acre tract from M-1, Industrial to B-1, Business to construct a rescue squad building and for Planning Commission review of the compatibility of a proposed rescue squad facility and the Comprehensive Plan, located at the southeast corner of Brambleton and Valley Forge Avenues in the Cave Spring Magisterial District. 5 ~. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance amending Secti Telephone Tax, of Chapte County Code reducing the telephone service to fun System. 2. Ordinance accepting an o sale and conveyance of s on Route 633, Benois Roa 3. Ordinance authorizing th and easement to Appalach 4. Ordinance amending and r of tax; amount of the Ro for the taxation of food consumption. (~ SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES on 21-4 (a), Enhan of ation T 2 ced Emeraencv the Roanoke , ax 1, r tax on purchases of local d the E911 Emergency Telephone ffer for and autho rizing the urplus real estate - well lot d. e conveyance of a right-of-way ian Power Company. eenacting Section 21-151, Levv anoke County Code ld f to provide remises off- or that is so p R. CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS S . ADJOURNMENT 6 a'~-~ a-aa- 89 ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA FEBRUARY 28, 1989 Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meeting. Regular meetings are held on the second Tuesday and the fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public Hearings will be heard at 7:00 p.m on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. 1'~~ A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.) 1. Roll Call. 2. Invocation: The Reverend Louis E. Carson Cave Spring United Methodist Church 3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag. B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS. C. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS AND AWARDS 1. Resolution of Appreciation to Art Whittaker upon his retirement from Piedmont Airlines D. NEW BUSINESS 1. Presentation from the Citizens for Governmental Excellence of petitions for the proposed f consolidation of Roanoke County and Roanoke City. ~',e»,~9 `~ 5-~- - 2. Final Recommendations on Proposed Landfill Sites C~nSGn~ ~.., 3. Award of Bids for $9 Million short-term borrowing. 4. Approval of 1989-90 Regional Airport Commission Budget. I'-~ ~ ~,' d v `"~' ~ ~ ~~~ i at i on f o r ~~ 1. Appropr 5• Republican PrimarY• ~ / 3 .. ~ • ~""7 E. F. G. gEQ[7EST FOR W0~ SESSIONS REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS ~ L ~s~ ppPOINTMENTS Resources Board l• Community Corrections Board League of Older Americans Advisory 2. fission 3• Transportation and Safety Comm Council/Y°uth and Court Service Unit Advisory 4• Services Advisory Board Family TS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS H. REPOR 2 I. CONSENT AGENDA ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY. 1. Minutes of Meetings - July 26, 1989, August 9, 1989, August 23, 1989 2. Confirmation of Committee Appointment to the Court Service Unit Advisory Council/Youth and Family Services Advisory Board 3. Approval of Raffle Permit for the Cave Spring Jaycees. 4. Adoption of Resolution of Appreciation to the Honorable Jack B. Coulter, Judge of the 23rd Judicial Circuit. 5. Authorization to grant 40' easement to Appalachian Power Company. 6. Acceptance of a 10-foot water line easement being dedicated by Dominion Bank. 7. Request for acceptance of Huntridge Road and Britany Road in the Va. Department of Transportation Secondary System. 8. Request for acceptance of Kildeer~ircle and Falcon Ridge Road into the Va. Department of Transportation Secondary System. 9. Acceptance of water and sewer facilities serving Section No. 2, Huntridge 10. Acknowledgment from the Virginia Department of Tansportation that the following roads have been accepted into the Secondary System: a. 0.11 miles of Fox Ridge Road b. 0.40 miles of Peregrine Crest Circle c. 0.25 miles of Fox Ridge Road d. 0.15 miles of Silver Fox Road ~` ~ 11. Authorization to initiate a sanitary sewer project iv~w ~'-' for the Highfields/Lakeland Road Area. -~3 trlS l n ~ S S ~~' 3 initiate a water project for the ~thorization to 12. Road Area. `c~~ c•,^~ 5S Old Hollins serving White ,v ~~..~ 13. Acceptance of sewer facilities Subdivision. CITIZENS' COMI~NTS AND COMMUNICATIONS J• ro osed building and Sumner to address P P Pointe. 1• Karen Winterberry -~ safety concerns at I rick to address safety concerns GGW`"' 2 , Melvin T . Pat within Winterberry Pointe. R. REPORTS 1• Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance 2• General Fund Unappropriated Balance 3• Board Contingency Fund - January 1889 « ~ ^ ,~ ~/ 4 , Accounts Paid , !~ ~`,, ~(~,~„jl Status of E911 tax. ---" ~ ~""~ 5• enditures as Income Analysis and Statement of Exp 6. of ~c~.n . 3 ~ ~ 1 °1 g' q ~. L. y~ORK SESSIONS int Work Session with Parks and Recreation 1• JO Commission. Advisory suant to the Code of Virginia M• EXECUTIVE SESSI P Section 2.1-344 ~ 1 V ~~~ EVENING SESSION • ~~ ' 00 cMITe ~ 1989) t.._G~- nc! •F ~ 1 I ~ HEp,RINGS (289-1 WAS HEARD ON FEBRUARY 14, N. PUBLIC N, Bradle to rezone a Petition of J. L. Woltz and R• 28g-2 from R-1. Residentialresidences, 2.92 acre tract ring Residential to construct multifamily ed at 3464 Chaparral Drive in the Cave SP locat Magisterial District. 4 Catherine Fortun for a Use Not and cat boarding Petition of William ando erate a dog 289-3 a residence on a 5.45 acre tract provided for Permit to P ring kennel in addition to cated at 5'74 Lowland Lane in the Cave P to Magisterial District. rezone an approximate Petition of J. Edward 1°Business and R-1 Residential to 289-4 restaurant, located oni.tehe 1.2 acre tract frog Btruct a 280 feet week of g_2, Business to south side efwPeters Creek Roa , ith South Drive in the Hollins intersectlo 1,02 Magisterial District. to rezone a Bank Inc. B_2 Business Petition of Central Fideli3 Business to 289-5 from B-2 and B- ' 4143 Franklin Road in acre tract a bank, located at to construc~ing Magisterial District. the Cave SP 3,'75 acre Fekas Homes, Inc. to rezone a Industrial, Residential Estates to M-1, 289-6 Petition of intersection of tract from RED in the Vinton located at the nor~iesle Avenue of t e 16th Street and Ca Magisterial District. roffered William Maas to amend the P 0.56 acre tract Petition of 198'7 °n a la round 28g-~ conditions dated Novemb and1se11 wooden p Yg, to construct, assembly located at 3639 Brambleton Avenue in t e equipment isterial District. Windsor Hills Mag 0 Develo ment Cor oration Industrial to M-1, Petition of Lin erfelt from M-2, 289-8 2.68 acre trace ecial Exception Permit o°ete, rezone a obtain a P art of Valleyp Industrial aedcial uses to become p 11g feet related comet north side of Kenworth Road located on the rsection with Peters Creek Road in the west of its ante isterial District. Hollins Mag of Roanoke Count Board of Su ervisors to Industrial to B-1, 289-9 Petition and for rezone a 1.03 acre tract rescue squad building atibility of a Business to constdruct a rehensive planning Commission review of t andcthe Comp corner of Brambleton a proposed rescue squad facility S ring Magisterial plan, located at the southeast Valley Forge Avenues in the Cave P District. p, FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES ~~ /• ~s ~~~- / y 5 Q. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES R. CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS S . ADJOURNMENT ~~~ a-aa- a9 ` ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS .~. AGENDA .FEBRUARY 28, 1989 Regular Board of Supervisors meeting. at 3.00 Welcome to the Roanoke County and the fourth Tuesday - meetings are held on the second Tuesday m on the fourth Tuesday p•m, public Hearings will be heard at ?:00 p• h month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. of eac p,• OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M-) 1, Roll Call. 2, Invocation: The ReveingdUn~ted Methodist Church Cave Sp 3• Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag. B• REQUESTS-TO POSTPONE, ADD, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS. C• PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS AND AWARDS reciation to Art Whittaker upon his 1, Resolution of App retirement from Piedmont Airlines D, NEW BUSINESS 1~ Presentation from thensiforethefpr posed mental Excellence of petitio and Roanoke City. consolidation of Roanoke County ,F.u~~ Proposed Landfill Sites .~ short-term borrowing. _. r ,~_~,....-n tonal Airport Commission /4. Approval of 1989-90 Reg' ___:__ Budget . (`~'~~ „~. 5, 1 Appropriation for the ~~ i-: =- Republican Primary. • 13 'I~~--~ ~ $ k~ C~ Iq ter. E, REQUEST FOR WORK SESSIONS F, REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS G. APPOINTMENTS -S-: Community Corrections Resources Board 2. League of Older Americans Advisory Board 3. Transportation and Safety Commission 4. Court Service Unit Advisory Council/Youth and __ - Family Services Advisory Board I. CONSENT AGENDA A,LL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE f ONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IROMI~HESCONSENT AGENDA AND WILLTBE CONSIDERED REMOVED F SEPARATELY. 1. Minutes of Meetings - July 26, 1989, August 9, 1989, August 23, 1989 2. Confirmation of Committee Appointment to the Court Service Unit Advisory Council/Youth and Family Services Advisory Board 3, Approval of Raffle Permit for the Cave Spring Jaycees. 4. Adoption of Resolution of Appreciation to the Honorable Jack B. Coulter, Judge of the 23rd Judicial Circuit. 5. Authorization to grant 40' easement to Appalachian Power Company. g, - Acceptance of a 10-foot water line easement being dedicated by Dominion Bank. 7. Request for acceptance of Huntridge Road and Britany Road in the Va. Department of Transportation Secondary System. 8, Request for acceptance of Kildeer circle and Falcon Ridge Road into the Va. Department of Transportation Secondary System. g, Acceptance of water and sewer facilities serving -- Section No. 2, Huntridge 10. Acknowledgment from the Virginia Department of Tansportation that the following roads have been accepted into the Secondary System: a. b: d. -_ _.Nb -~---~a _.--__ -fie ~~~._ 1~-=- Q -~_ ~ 0.11 miles of Fox Ridge Road 0.40 miles of Peregrine Crest Circle 0.25 miles of Fox Ridge Road 0.15 miles of Silver Fox Road to initiate a sanitary sewer project _~.c--l!i:' y' fieRlds/.Lakeland Road Area. I~ TN~ * ~nitiate a water project for the Area. 13.E Acceptance of sewer facilities serving White Subdivision. J. CITIZENS' COML"IENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS 1. Karen Sumner to address proposed building and safety concerns at Winterberry Pointe. 2. Melvin T. Patrick to address safety concerns within Winterberry Pointe. K. REPORTS 1. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance 2. General Fund Unappropriated Balance 3. Board Contingency Fund 4. Accounts Paid - January 1989 r, . ~'~ ~-----~_: Status of E911 tax. 6. Income Analysis and Statement of Expenditures as L. WORK SESSIONS 1. Joint Work Session with Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission. NI. EXECUTIVE SESSION pursuant to the Code of Virginia -S~G~iQn 2.1-344 ~ic~.tM. EVENING S I N 7.00 P.M. N , ~c.~il.rt.P ~ P1~~~ ~a.,~ __ ®. PUBLIC HEARINGS (289-1 WAS HEARD ON FEBRUARY 14, 19 289-2--Petition of J L Woltz and R N Bradlev to rezone a _,_,.,__2_.92 acre tract from R-1, Residential to R-3, ~~ ------=residential to construct multifamily residences, located at 3464 Chaparral Drive in the Cave Spring __ magisterial District. 4 289-3 Petition of Willi m nd Provided for rermit to o h rin F r n for a kennel in addition Perate a do Use Not c located at to a residence on and cat boarding MagisterialSDistri~tand Lane in 5.45 acre tract the Cave Spring 289-4 Petition:~bf 1.2 acre '~• Edward nnr,o tract from B-1 Businessrandne an approximate B-2, Business to construct a R-1 Residential to south side of Peters Creek Roadstaurant intersection with 280 feetlweekeofoitshe Magisterial Districtuth Drive in the Hollins 289-5 Petition of acre tract from g 1 Fi li v E nk In to rezone a to construct a 2 and B-3, Business to B- 1.02 the Cave S bank, located at 4143 FranklinBusiness pring Magisterial District.. Road in 289-6 Petition of Fekas Hom s, Inc. tract from RE, Residential Estatesezone a located at 3.75 acre the northeast corner of theM ntersectionaof 16th Street and Carlisle Avenue in the Vinto Magisterial District. n 289-7 Petition of William conditions dated Noveaas to amend the to construct tuber 17, 1987 Proffered assembly and sell wooden p~a56 acre tract =>Y~T ndsornHillsaMagiste Yground 3639 Brambleton Avenue in the real District. 28g-g Petition of Lin erfelt Dev 1 m rezone a 2.768 acre n Industrial and tract from M-2 r r l n to obtain a Special ExceptiontPermitof r1, related commercial uses located on the north sideoofecome part of Valle west of its intersection withKpnworth Road 119 feetnte, Hollins Magisterial District, eters Creek Road in the _289-9 Petition of ,'-rezone a R an ke ount B ar ~-' 1.03 acre tract from M_ f S `B-usiness to rvi r to consty~uct a rescue s' Industrial to B-1, Planning Commission review of quad buildin proposed rescue the compatibili9 and for Plan, located squad facility and the Com y of a Valle at the southeast corner of Bpa~letoneand y Forge Avenues in the Cave Spring Ma District. gisterial P• FIRS-READINr OF ORDINANCES 5 c Q. SECOND READING OF~.ORDINANCES R. CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS S . ADJOURNMENT 6