HomeMy WebLinkAbout3/28/1989 - Regularof a°ANO~"F
.~ ~ -
.~
~~
18 t50
.~~ 88
SFSQUICENTENN~P~
ABeautifulBeginning ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
ACTION AGENDA
MARCH 28, 1989
Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meeting. Regular
meetings are held on the second Tuesday and the fourth Tuesday at 3:OC
p.m. Public Hearings will be heard at 7:00 p.m on the fourth Tuesday
of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced.
A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.)
1. Roll Call. HCN ABSENT
2. Invocation: The Reverend Rudy Holland
Berean Baptist Church
3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag.
B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA
ITEMS.
ECH - WITHDREW ITEM D-3, REQUEST FROM TREASURER TO EXPAND NCR CASHING
SYSTEM
C. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS AND AWARDS
NONE
D. NEW BUSINESS
1. Status of the 75/25 Economic Development Policy
BLJ/RR TO DELAY FOR 60 DAYS FOR REVIEW AND EVALUATION OF POLICY
URC WITH HCN ABSENT
2. Authorization to extend water lines on Williamson
Road.
A-32889-1
LG.SAM TO APPROVE ALT. ~l
AYES-RR,SAM,LG
ABSTAIN-BLJ
ABSENT-HCN
3. Request from Treasurer to expand NCR Cashing
System
WITHDRAWN
4. Authorization to amend Chapter 8 of the Roanoke
County Code "Erosion and Sediment Control"
A-32889-2
SAM/BLJ TO APPROVE ALT. ~1
URC - HCN ABSENT
5. Request for appropriation for construction of Back
Creek Fire Department building.
A-32889-3
LG/SAM TO APPROVE ALT. #1 WITH CAP ESTABLISHED OF $307,000
URC - HCN ABSENT
6. Acceptance of a donated vehicle to the Mount
Pleasant Fire Company.
A-32889-4
BLJ/RR TO APPROVE ALT. ~1
URC - HCN ABSENT
LETTER OF APPRECIATION TO WDBJ FOR DONATION
E. REQUEST FOR WORK SESSIONS
1. Request for a Work Session on April 11, 1989 and Public
Hearing on April 25, 1989 on the Funding Priorities for
the Secondary Highway Six Year Construction Plan.
WORK SESSION SET FOR 4/11/89
F. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS
PUBLIC HEARING ON 6-YEAR PLAN $ET FOR 4/25/89
G. APPOINTMENTS
NONE
1. Community Corrections Resources Board
2
2. League of Older Americans Advisory Board
3. Court Service Unit Advisory Council/Youth and
Family Services Advisory Board
H. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS
JOHNSON ASKED WHO ENFORCES THE REQUIREMENTS THAT TRUCKS HAULING
DIRT, ETC. MUST HAVE COVERS. PMM ADVISED ANY LAW ENFORCEMENT
OFFICER MAY ENFORCE THAT LAW, BUT THERE ARE EXEMPTIONS TO THE LAW.
BLJ ASKED COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR TO INVESTIGATE THE LEGISLATION AND
CONTACT THE SHERIFF.
ROBERS ADVISED HE HAD RECEIVED A LETTER FROM WILLIAMSBURG
REGARDING HIGHWAY FUNDS THAT ARE BEING USED IN THAT AREA. WOULD
LIKE TO SEE IF IT WOULD BE POSSIBLE TO DIVERT SOME FUNDS TO
ROANOKE COUNTY. ASKED COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR TO INVESTIGATE.
MCGRAW ADVISED HE FELT THAT A REFUSE FEE SHOULD BE REINSTITUTED
TO FUND AN EXPANDED RECYCLING PROGRAM. ASKED FOR CITIZENS INPUT
ON THIS ISSUE.
GARRETT ASKED THAT VDOT AND CLEAN VALLEY COUNCIL BE CONTACTED
ABOUT POSSIBILITY OF REMOVING TRASH ALONG ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAYS
I. CONSENT AGENDA
ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE
CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WILL BE
ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED
BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE
REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED
SEPARATELY.
R-32889-5
BLJ/LG TO APPROVE
URC - HCN ABSENT
1. Approval of Raffle Permit - Mason Cove Fire
Department
A-32889-5.a
2. Adoption of resolution amending resolution 83-43
establishing a policy for use of Community Room.
R-32889-5.b
3. Resolution of Appreciation to recognizing school
food service employees.
3
R-32889-5.c
4. Acceptance of water and sewer facilities serving
Woodbridge Section 10.
A-32889-5.d
5. Acceptance of water and sewer facilities serving
the Forest Condominiums
A-32889-5.e
6. Resolution supporting the certification of a
judicial vacancy in the General District Court of
the Twenty-third Judicial Circuit.
R-32889-5.f
7. Request for support that the Virginia Employment
Commission be named substate Grantee for the
Dislocated Workers Program.
A-32889-5.a
J. CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS
1. Lee Linkous to address budget concerns.
ASKED BOARD TO WORK ON RAISING LEVEL OF COUNTY SALARIES AND THAT
ALL COUNTY SALARIES BE TREATED EQUALLY.
K. REPORTS
SAM/LG TO RECEIVE AND FILE
URC - HCN ABSENT
1. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance
2. General Fund Unappropriated Balance
3. Board Contingency Fund
4. Income Analysis and Statement of Expenditures as
of February 28, 1989.
L. EXECUTIVE SESSION pursuant to the Code of Virginia
Section 2.1-344 (7) TO DISCUSS A LEGAL MATTER; (1) TO
DISCUSS A PERSONNEL MATTER.
LG/BLJ AT 4:00 P.M.
4
URC - HCN ABSENT
OPEN SESSION
SAM/RR AT 5:00 P.M.
URC - HCN ABSENT
EVENING SESSION (7:00 P M )
M. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS AND AWARDS
1. Resolution of Appreciation to Ida and Ernest H.
Arthur.
R-32889-6
BLJ/SAM TO APPROVE
UW - HCN ABSENT
N. PUBLIC HEARINGS (389-1 AND 389-2 WERE HEARD ON MARCH 14,
1989)
389-3 Petition of J. L. Woltz and R N Bradlev to rezone a
2.92 acre tract from R-1, Residential to R-3,
Residential to construct multifamily residences,
located at 3464 Chaparral Drive in the Cave Spring
Magisterial District. (CONTINUED FROM FEBRUARY 28,
1989.)
RR/BLJ TO CONTINUE
TO 4/25/89
URC - HCN ABSENT
389-4 Petition of William and Eugenia Ball requesting
rezoning from R-1 Residential to B-1 Business to
operate medical offices in an existing structure, and
to amend the Future Land Use Map designation from
Development to Transition of a tract containing 1.23
acres and located at 3511 Ogden Road in the Cave Spring
Magisterial District.
REZONING:
RR/BLJ TO APPROVE WITH PROFFERS
URC - HCN ABSENT
LAND USE MAP AMENDMENT :
RR/SAM TO APPROVE
URC - HCN ABSENT
389-5 Petition of Jack Bess requesting rezoning from R-3
Residential to B-1 Business to operate an office in an
existing structure on a tract containing 2.16 acres and
5
r
located at 5422 Starkey Road in the Cave Spring
Magisterial District.
RR/SAM TO APPROVE WITH PROFFERS
URC - HCN ABSENT
389-6 Petition of Stebhen and Michelle Wike requesting
rezoning from R-1 Residential to B-1 Business of a
tract containing 1,13 acres to operate an office in an
existing structure located at 5681 Starkey Road in the
Cave Spring Magisterial District.
RR/SAM TO APPROVE WITH PROFFERS
URC - HCN ABSENT
0. PUBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES
389-7 Petition of The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
requesting amendments to the Roanoke County subd~ivisior.
ordinance by adopting the Roanoke County on-site sewage
disposal systems and/or wells procedures and adoption
of a resolution adopting a new section of the Design
and Construction Manual,
LG/BLJ TO APPROVE 1ST READING
2ND - 4/11/89
URC - HCN ABSENT
P. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES
Q. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES
1. Ordinance amending Chapter 7, "Building Regulations" of
the Roanoke County Code by amending Article II,
"Building Code", Section 7-16, "Adopted".
0-32889-7
BLJ/RR TO APPROVE
URC - HCN ABSENT
R. CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS
1, The following citizens have requested to speak
concerning parks:
a. Wayland Winstead, 5353 Cherokee Hills Drive was
concerned about whether the Catawba area will have same
number of fields available next year,
6
b. Chuck Johnson, 1655 Mill Pond Drive, representing
the Catawba Little League, spoke concerning lack of
fields at Green Hill Park.
c. Bill Allen, 1702 Kings Mill Drive, representing the
Glenvar Youth booster who support football, basketball
and soccer spoke of the need of additional soccer
fields.
SAM REQUESTED THAT PLANS TO REPLACE THE FIELDS BE INCLUDED IN THE
BUDGET PROCESS AND THAT AT LEAST A YEAR'S NOTICE BE GIVEN BEFORE THE
COUNTY MUST GIVE UP THE PRESENT FIELDS, SO THAT GREEN HILL PARK FIELD;
WILL BE READY.
S . ADJOURNMENT
BLJ/RR AT 8:40 - UVV
HCN - ABSENT
7
a
o~ aoaNO,~~
~~
Z A
a? ~~r~~~ ~f ~~r~ ~
,~ ~ ~t~ .~
18 ,~~ 88
SFSQUICENTENN~P~
ABeautifuBeginning ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
MARCH 28, 1989
Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meeting. Regular
meetings are held on the second Tuesday and the fourth Tuesday at 3:OC
p.m. Public Hearings will be heard at 7:00 p.m on the fourth Tuesday
of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced.
A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.)
1. Roll Call.
2. Invocation: The Reverend Rudy Holland
Berean Baptist Church
3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag.
B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA
ITEMS.
C. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS AND AWARDS
D. NEW BUSINESS
1. Status of the 75/25 Economic Development Policy
2. Authorization to extend water lines on Williamson
Road.
3. Request from Treasurer to expand NCR Cashing
System
4• Authorization to amend Chapter 8 of the Roanoke
County Code "Erosion and Sediment Control"
5• Request for appropriation for construction of Back
Creek Fire Department building,
6• Acceptance of a donated vehicle to the Mount
Pleasant Fire Company.
E• REQUEST FOR WORK SESSIONS
1• Request for a Work Session on April 11, 1989 and Public
Hearing on April 25, 1989 on the Funding Priorities for
the Secondary Highway Six Year Construction Plan.
F• REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS
G - APPOINTMENTS
1• Community Corrections Resources Board
2• League of Older Americans Advisory Board
3• Court Service Unit Advisory Council/Youth and
Family Services Advisory Board
H• REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS
I- CONSENT AGENDA
ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE
CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WILL BE
ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED
BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE
REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED
SEPARATELY.
1• Approval of Raffle Permit - Mason Cove Fire
Department
2• Adoption of resolution amending resolution 83-43
establishing a policy for use of Community Room.
2
3• Resolution of Appreciation to recognizing school
food service employees.
4• Acceptance of water and sewer facilities serving
Woodbridge Section 10.
5• Acceptance of water and sewer facilities serving
the Forest Condominiums
6• Resolution supporting the certification of a
judicial vacancy in the General District Court of
the Twenty-third Judicial Circuit.
~. Request for support that the Virginia Employment
Commission be named substate Grantee for the
Dislocated Workers Program.
J- CITIZENS' COMNRENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS
1• Lee Linkous to address budget concerns.
R• REPORTS
1• Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance
2• General Fund Unappropriated Balance
3• Board Contingency Fund
4• Income Analysis and Statement of Expenditures as
of February 28, 1989.
L• EXECUTIVE SESSION pursuant to the Code of Virginia
Section 2.1-344
EVENING SESSION (7.00 p M
3
M. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS AND AWARDS
1• Resolution of Appreciation to Ida and Ernest H.
Arthur.
N- PUBLIC HEARINGS (389-1 AND 389-2 WERE NF.ARiI ON MARCH 14,
1989)
389-3 Petition of J L. Woltz and R. N. Bradle to rezone a
2.92 acre tract from R-1, Residential to R-3,
Residential to construct multifamily residences,
located at 3464 Chaparral Drive in the Cave Spring
Magisterial District. (CONTINUED FROM FEBRUARY 28~
1989.)
389-4 Petition of William and Eu enia Ball requesting
rezoning from R-1 Residential to B-1 Business to
operate medical offices in an existing structure, and
to amend the Future Land Use Map designation from
Development to Transition of a tract containing 1.23
acres and located at 3511 Ogden Road in the Cave Spring
Magisterial District.
389-5 Petition of Jack Bess requesting rezoning from R-3
Residential to B-1 Business to operate an office in an
existing structure on a tract containing 2.16 acres and
located at 5422 Starkey Road in the Cave Spring
Magisterial District.
389-6 Petition of Stephen and Michelle Wike requesting
rezoning from R 1 Residential to B-1 Business of a
tract containing 1.13 acres to operate an office in an
existing structure located at 5681 Starkey Road in the
Cave Spring Magisterial District.
O- PUBLIC HEARING AND FIRST RFAnING OF ORDINANCES
389-7 Petition of The Roanoke Count Board of Su ervisors
requesting amendments to the Roanoke County subdivision
ordinance by adopting the Roanoke County on-site sewage
disposal systems and/or wells procedures and adoption
of a resolution adopting a new section of the Design
and Construction Manual.
L'• FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES
Q. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES
4
1- Ordinance amending Chapter 7, "Building Regulations"
the Roanoke County Code by amending Article II,
"Building Code", Section 7-16, "Adopted".
R- CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS
1- The following citizens have requested to speak
concerning parks:
a- Wayland Winstead
b- Chuck Johnson
c- Bill Allen
S- ADJOURNMENT
5
ACTION #
ITEM NUMBER ~ "'
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD O.F SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE:
AGENDA ITEM:
March 28, .1989
Status of Economic Development 75/25 Policy
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
BACKGROUND:
The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors updated the Economic
Development Strategy in October 1987. A policy was developed to
create a balance between the residential and commercial/industrial
sections of the County's tax base. The County is specifically
seeking to raise the proportion of the real estate tax base which
is derived from the commercial/industrial sector from 14 percent
(1983) to 25 percent. The fiscal year 1988-89 level is 15.7
percent.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Sufficient funds exist in the proposed Economic Development
budget to implement the Economic Development Policy.
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Readopt the Economic Development Policy as presented.
2. Take no action.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors adopt the existing
Economic Development Policy for FY 89-90.
SUBMITTED BY:
Timothy W. ubala, Director
Economic D elopment
APPROVED BY:
t
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
Approved
Denied
Received
Referred
To
Motion by:
ACTION
VOTE
No Yes Abs
Garrett
Johnson
McGraw
Nickens
Robers
Attachment
~-/
Economic Development Highlights
• Valleypointe Project - Roanoke County contributed $2 million
for land acquisition and water, sewer and road improvements to
develop the initial Phase I of a mixed use business park in
northern Roanoke County adjacent to I-581 and the Roanoke
Regional .Airport.
Recent announcements of locations include:
Digital Equipment Corporation - 50 employees
Stop-In Food Stores/Petroleum Marketers - 50 employees
• Tweeds, Inc., an upscale mail order catalog fulfillment center
located on a 25 acre site in the Botetourt-Roanoke County
Industrial Park.
• Southwest Industrial Park - Two small businesses purchased land
to locate their buildings for their operations.
• Small Business Assistance Center - County economic development
staff assisted Roanoke Regional Chamber of Commerce to obtain a
competitive grant for $75,000 from the Virginia Department of
Economic Development to locate a Small Business Assistance
Center.
• Regional Partnership - Full-time staff assistance for ten (10)
weeks to manage the office until an Executive Director was
selected.
• Regional Airport - County annual contribution of $264,640 to
the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission for operations for the
next eight (8) years.
• Coordination of "Economic Bridges" between Northern Virginia
and the Roanoke Valley to develop mutual economic opportunities
between the two regions.
• Marketing efforts to promote Roanoke County economic
development in Piedmont Airlines Pace Magazine and Virginia
RuSi nr~ca _
• Joint marketing and prospecting efforts with Roanoke City and
the New River Valley in Northern Virginia.
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT POLICY
I. Introduction
The creation of wealth is the goal of any economic develop-
ment program. Since Roanoke County is a local government within
the "community" of the Roanoke Valley, its economic development
efforts affect the entire Valley. The development activities of
all local governments and the private sector contribute to the
creation of wealth which can be translated into jobs, payroll and
tax revenue.
Roanoke County has carried out an economic development
program since 1983. Initial program direction was outlined in an
Economic Development Strate y adopted by the Board of Supervisors
in January 1985.
Emphasis by the Board on the residential commercial/indus-
trial composition of the County tax base led to a readoption of
the strategy in October 1987. At that time, a goal of obtaining
a 75-25 ratio proportion in the tax base between residential and
commercial/industrial was adopted and implemented.
II. The 75/25 Policy
The 75/25 policy seeks to create a balance between the
residential and commercial/industrial sections of the real estate
tax base. This balance in the local economy is needed to help
pay for the increasing demand for public resources that results
from rapid growth of the residential population. Specifically,
the goal is to raise the proportion of the real estate tax base
which comes from the commercial/industrial sector from 14 percent
(1983) to 25 percent. The Fiscal Year 1989 level is 15.71
percent. (Figure 1.) This increase in the percentage of
commercial/industrial is due to a $175,000,000 increase in the
value of land and improvements over the six year period as shown
in Table 1 below.
The increase in assessed value is a heavy indicator of the
growth of the County's commercial/industrial sector. Other indi-
cators include job growth, new business start-ups, site/land
development, building permits, retention activities and transient
(hotel) tax receipts. Table 3 shows the economic indicators that
reflect Roanoke County's economic growth since the 75/25 policy
was announced.
Table 1
Total taxable Total commercial/ Commercial/industrial
Assessed Value industrial as $ of total taxable
1983 1,640,277,101 209,267,500 12.75
1984 1,669,389,451 236,265,400 14.2
1985 2,019,708,890 307,421,640 15.2
1986 2,070,897,590 318,271,840 15.3
1987 2,261,037,800 348,810,400 15.4
1988 2,447,167,800 385,199,400 15.7
1
~-/
Level 1
Basic-Reactive
HOOPIOMIC DEVE[APMEIJP
PROGRAM I,EVF3,S
Program
Areas
1. Sites
Buildings
2, Retention
3, Location of
new bus Hess
Advetsising_
Inventory of
sites and parks
Inventory of
buildings
TABLE 2
Level 2
Participatory
Joint participation
with public or
private partner
Leasing/sale of
buildings
Level 3
Proactive
Publically awned
and developed
industrial sites
Shell building
and incubators
Visitation Problem solving International trade
Recognition (Training, financing assistance
liaison with other Targeting suppliers
departments )
Rely on others
for leads,
walk-ins
Local and state
name awareness
Join organizations
that develop leads
Promote canrunity
regionally and
nationally
Marketing unity profile Quality brochure
Strategy and Advertorials Marketing book
tools Press releases Selective Adver-
Newsletter tising
Regional Prospec~
Gifts
4. Travel and Information Membership in
Tourism. dissemenation local and regional
Sell tourism travel and tourism
locally organizations
Regional events
2
Solicit targeted
out-of-state business
Attend Trade Shows
Coordinate targeted
advertising with
marketing strategy
Video presentations
Extensive prospecting
Hiring a.marketing
firm
ping Participation fn
MOP & IDRC
Direct mail
Welcane center Planning
Event scheduling
Destination
development
~-/
Table 3
Roanoke County
Economic Indicators
1987
1988 Net
Change $
Chance
Total jobs 24,235 25,816 1,577
6.5
New business starts 3,000 3
300 300
, 9.0
Total acres in
industrial parks 25
77
52
70.0
Economic Development Program
There are four
have an effective e (4> primary
conomic de areas that
velopment are needed
r in order to
defined as: p
ogram. These are
1. Sites and buildings: Having an updated inventory of
buildings as well as developed sites.
2. Retention of existing business: Assistance to the
companies in the community.
3. Location of new business: Attracting new business from
outside the community.
4. Tourism and travel: Encouragement of a major destination
site.
The staff_ effort will concentrate on these four (4) program
areas within three (3) activity levels; titled basic-reactive,
participatory and proactive. Work elements are identified (See
Table 2) within each program area which become progressively more
staff intensive and require financial commitments. Currently,
Roanoke County is at a participatory level in all four economic
development program.
nuring Fiscal Year 1989-90, the staff's goal is to move into
Level 3 proactive measures with a concentration on the program
area for the location of new business. A direct mail campaign
supported by selected advertising will be used in two (2) out of
state regions to target selected companies for expansion and/or
relocation into the Roanoke County area.
3
1983
~ -/
RESI~ENiI
~ COhiMlIN~O ~flGRI.
81.1
4,9I
14.01
1989
RESIDENIL
~ COMM/INDUS
~flCRI,
80.6
3 . ?l
1S, ?/,
4
FIGURE 1
32889-1
ACTION #
ITEM NUMBER ~ - ~
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: March 28, 1989
AGENDA ITEM:
Authorization to extend water lines on
Williamson Road
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
BACKGROUND:
The development plans for the proposed Hollins Court
development indicated that water would be provided by bulk water
service from the City of Roanoke with the associated bulk meter
placed on the east side of Williamson Road. Plans were approved
in January, 1988.
When the request to install this service was received by the
Utility Department, it was discovered that a bulk water service
was not required and that the connection to the city line would
be made on the west side of Williamson Road.
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
Under the provisions of the Water Ordinance, this
installation is a public water system and would require the
developer to provide the entire cost o.f the extension including
the permit to cross Williamson Road.
Between the time the plan was approved in January, 1988, and
the request of the connection in January, 1989, the developer had
already developed the costs of the Hollins Court project and
established the sale price of the lots contingent upon
improvements on the approved plan.
The developer has requested that the County extend the line
to the east side of Williamson Road so that water service can be
available under the same general conditions as previously
approved on the plans in 1988.
1
ALTERNATIVES AND IMPACTS:
p~~
1. The Board of Supervisors would authorize the Utility
Department to extend the water line across Williamson Road as
indicated on the January, 1988 approved plan. This alternative
will cost approximately $8,000.00 to $12,000.00 depending on
costs placed upon this work by the Department of Transportation
permit conditions. Funds are available within the Utility
Enterprise Fund for this extension.
2. The Board of Supervisors would not authorize the Utility
Department to extend the water line across Williamson Road. The
developer would then be required to make the extension at his
cost under the provisions of the Ordinance. This alternative
would be at no cost to the County.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Board approve alternative number
one so that the developer will not have to absorb additional
costs that were discovered after plan approval.
SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED:
,~~~,
Cliffo Craig, Elmer C. Hodge
Utility Director County Administrator
Approved ( ~
Denied ( )
Received ( )
Referred
to
cc:
ACTION VOTE
Motion by: Lee Garrett/
Steven A. McGraw to approve
Alternative #1
No Yes Abs
Garrett x
Johnson Abstain
McGraw x
Nickens Absent
Robers x
File
Cliff Craig, Director, Utilities
Phillip Henry, Director, Engineering
John Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator
2
~:~ ----<
'n v ~ ~ "G ~ \ ~.NIXIiNF
ti ~Lt/LW( Y ~y
~~ coL~E~E a"~' o
Npf1iN5 cocKf ~;~ ~
/. T B T C£M. eOntrlFG rn \ `w
PLI NT ~NONApD JOHNSON'S 'd
uB[E ~~y/~' ..Dray co06E a ~ tt
,ENVEL v ~ p0" ~ FSIAURANf ~
CbNP,aY f M t 1 ~. • 20
F~y~fV~ONAIMAN ~1~ ~ ~ ,V
Few '~µ 4 ~ ~• ~~
HO[UNS
\~KfY' ~ ~ ~ SrAr1QA(
.b' aCIN1F _
--- ~, - ~ ------ - f - `..VIC'INITY ~ AP ~_.,__~:-
NORTH
EXISTING 8" WATER LINE
,,.J ,
,,,Fa,.
2Tao
o•
a U IIF 101
• >0 ~ /p
.----~
---,
. ,
,,
~.;
~;;
,,
~ ~ ~..
.~
,' ~-~
`~ .
1
»~s
t
~~
PROPOSED 8"
WATER LINE
r.~
zs
f.w ~ ~
Is
naa
ze ~.
,••'
` zs ~ '
*af
.9 -' :\~ ,
~~ ~
%~ 11 fats
. `•° ~ ~ ~
>~ ~ is ~ 4. ~~ ~
~i r -
!~
~o
' i
.. III
AUTHORIZATION TO E%TEND WATER LINES ON
COMMUNITY SERVICES {IIILLIAMSON ROAD
AND DEVELOPMENT
i
2~, I ~
ACTION ~k
ITEM NUMBER Z~
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: March 28, 1989
AGENDA ITEM: Request for funds to expand the NCR Cashing System
in the Treasurer's~Office.
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
BACKGROUND:
Implemented in January 1988, the NCR Cashing System has been
in continious operation since that time. Used for Collection of
Taxes and other Revenue due the County and interfacing with the
Accounts Receivable System.
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
According to the Commissioner of the Revenue, we should
anticipate over 100,000 assessments in 1989. This represents an
increase of 20% over 1988. NCR representatives have informed us
that the amount of free disc storage space will be inadequate to
accomodate the increased requirements. (resulting from new
assessments). Our local information system personnel concur with
the NCR assessments.
ALTERNATIVES AND
IMPACTS:~~
Purchase an additional disc drive for the NCR system.
Estimated cost will be $10,000. The only other alternative would
be reverting to a manual system, which is totally impractical.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors appropriate
$10,000 from the Board Contingency Fund-for this project.
Respec f hly sub~ritted,; Approv d by,
Al re C. Anderson Elmer C. Hodge
Treasurer County Administrator
i
------------------------------------------------------------------
ACTION VOTE
Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs
Denied ( ) Garrett
Received ( ) Johnson
Referred McGraw
To Nickens
Robers
ACTION # A-32889-2
ITEM NUMBER ~ '-" /~
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: March 28, 1989
AGENDA ITEM: Authorization to amend Chapter 8 of the Roanoke
County Code entitled "Erosion and Sediment Control".
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
BACKGROUND:
On November 3, 1988, a meeting was held with representatives
from the Commonwealth of Virginia Division of Soil and Water
Conservation and County staff concerning the need to update our
present Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinance.
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The amendments presented
either mandated by state law, or
government.
as a part of this report were
left as an option for the local
In updating the County's present ordinance, the County Staff
recommends title changes due to reorganizational changes within
the various departments, the addition of new state amendments
which enhance Roanoke County's enforcement capabilities and the
increasing of the filing fees in order to compensate the County's
cost of enforcing this ordinance, which is mandated by state law.
The amendments that are being considered for adoption are as
follows:
1. Title changes due to reorganizational changes.
a. Change Superintendent to Director of Development
and Inspections.
b. Superintendent of Public Facilities to Director of
Engineering.
c. Department of Development to Department of
Development and Inspections.
d. Department of Public Facilities to Department of
Engineering.
~- y
2. Amend Section 8-2 - Definitions. Adopt definitions as
outlined under Section 10.1-560 of the Virginia Erosion and
Sediment Control Law.
3. Repeal Section 8-3. Exemptions from Chapter. This will
be addressed under Definition Criteria.
4. Amend Section 8-7 - Penalties for violation of Chapter.
To include additional civil action for damages under Section
10.1-569 C, Code of Virginia and civil penalties not to exceed
$2,000.00 for each violation under Section 10.1-569 D, of the
Code of Virginia.
5. Amend Section 8-18 (b) - Failure to Comply with
approved plans. To incorporate the language of 10.1-566 A, of
the Code of Virginia regarding monitoring, reports and
inspections. This changes the fifteen day compliance period to
"a reasonable time to comply", which provides the County staff
more flexibility in determining whether an emergency situation
exists and the period of time in which the violation is to be
corrected.
6. Adopt Section 8-18 (c) - Stop-Work Order. Adopt
Section 10.1-566 C, Code of Virginia, authorizing Roanoke County
upon receipt of a sworn complaint of a substantial violation to
issue a.n order requiring that all or part of the land disturbing
activities permitted on the site be stopped until the specified
corrective measures have been taken.
7. Amend Section 8-32 - Filing Fees. To increase the
maximum fee limits from $300.00 to $1,000.00 per project as
permitted under Section 10.1-562 E, Code of Virginia.
Amend Roanoke County's filing fee from $50.00 plus
$5.00 per acre or a portion thereof, to $50.00 plus $50.00 per
acre or a portion thereof.
The first reading of the Ordinance is scheduled for April
11, 1989 and the second reading and public hearing is scheduled
for April 25, 1989.
ALTERNATIVES AND IMPACTS: ~~
1. Approve the amendments as submitted and authorize the
County Attorney to prepare the necessary Ordinance,
legal ads and schedule the public hearing. The
date of this Ordinance will be April 26, 1989. The
anticipated revenue generated from this fee increase
is between $10,000.00 to $15,000.00 annually.
2. Deny the recommendation. The present service will
continue to be subsidized by the General Fund.
~-y
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends Alternative 1.
S MITTED BY:
t ~'1
Arnold Cove
Development eview nd
Inspections Director
APPROVED:
~~.~_
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
-------- -------------------------------
ACTION -------------------
VOTE -------
Approved (x) Motion by: Steven A. McGraw/ No Yes Ab~nt
Denied ( ) Lee Garrett to approve Garrett x
Received ( ) Alternative #1 Johnson x
Referred McGraw x x
to Nickens x
Robers
cc: File
Arnold Covey, Director, Development & Inspections
Paul Mahoney, County Attorney
John Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator
ACTION # A-32889-3
ITEM NUMBER ~ - -~
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATIOid CENTER
MEETING DATE: March 28, 1989
SUBJECT: Back Creek Fire Department Building
COUNTY ADM NISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: y
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
Funding in the amount of $300,000 was included in the 1985 Bond
Referendum to construct a sub-station in the Back Creek area of Roanoke
County. Originally, this station was intended to be a satellite
operation of Company 3 - Cave Spring. The facility plan included a
single fire engine bay, office, restrooms, and storage area.
Since that time a 35 member volunteer fire company has been
formed and trained. With this inception, the scope of the project has
changed drastically. The volunteers became involved in the designing
of the facility. Changes were made to include two fire engine bays,
offices for fire and rescue, kitchen, lounge, bathrooms, storage,
meeting, and sleeping areas. Because of this change, staff has been
faced with trying to fund this additional cost from the original amount
budgeted. After site preparation, well drilling and architect/engineer
fees, we have $253,000 left in the project funds.
The project was bid based upon the design and desires of the
volunteer company. Bids exceeded the amount budgeted by approximately
$150,000. The architect was directed to redesign the project using a
pre-fab metal and brick building. The base bid was to only include the
two drive thru bays, offices, kitchen, and day room. Alternative bids
were to be one additional bay and a 3500 square foot second floor shell
with no stairs that could be finished at a future date.
The project was rebid with the low base bid being $267,990. The
additional bay cost is $22,250 and the second story shell cost is
$38,900.
c
~~
At the direction of the County Administrator, staff and a
representative of the volunteer company met with the architect/engineer
and low bidder to see if cost cuts could be made. There have been two
such meetings with no significant areas found to cut costs without
infringing upon the integrity and appearance of the facility. Also,
if the second floor is not included, it cannot be added later. The
additional space would have to be added by going out instead of up at
the approximate cost of $225,000. Staff feels that if we can include
the second floor shell, the volunteer company may ask the community's
help and complete the construction of the second floor.
Understanding the budget constraints and realizing there is
$253,000 available for construction, we must also recognize the need
to provide a sufficient facility in order to keep the volunteers
active.
ALTERNATIVES AND IMPACTS:
1. Approve the base bid of $267,990 with the addition of $38,900
for the second story at a total cost of $306,890 and appropriate
an additional $53,890 from the bond reserve to cover the costs.
2. Approve the base bid of $267,990 and appropriate an additional
$14,990 from the bond reserve to cover costs.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends Alternative 1.
Respectfully submitted,
Tho a C. uqua
Chi f of ire & e cue Department
Approved ( X)
Denied ( )
Received ( )
Referred
To
Approved by,
~ ~,~
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
ACTION
Motion by: Lee Garrett/Steven
McGraw to approve erna ive
# an amen e with cap
es a is e o 307,000
VOTE
A• No Yes Abs
Garrett x
Johnson x
McGraw x
Nickens Absent
Robers x
cc: File
Thomas C. Fuqua, Chief, Fire & Rescue
Reta Busher, Director, Management & Budget
Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance
Jack Council, Director, Procurement
ACTION #
A-32889-4
ITEM NUMBER ~' -
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: March 28, 1989
SUBJECT: Vehicle Donation to Mt. Pleasant Fire Company
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMEN/TS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
WDBJ-TV wishes to donate a 1979 Hi-Cube Van, serial number
CGL3490188291, to the Mt. Pleasant Fire Company. This vehicle will be
used to carry Level II hazardous materials equipment such as
absorbents, diking materials, pads, booms, fencing, etc.
The Mt. Pleasant Fire Company originally planned to use their
current personnel transporting vehicle, a ten-passenger van for this
purpose. In order to do this, the company has requested a car to
replace this unit. However, funding is not available in the proposed
FY 1989-90 budget.
Volunteer Fire Captain Jack Gee of Mt. Pleasant works for WDBJ-
TV and has worked out the details of the donation. Also, Captain Gee
has advised that the vehicle is in good mechanical condition.
Historically, Roanoke County has provided insurance coverage and
repair costs on vehicles bought by or donated to a volunteer fire
company.
Staff has reviewed this proposal and concurs with the donation
with the understanding that the unit is used for its intended purposes
and the Roanoke County Haz-Mat Response Policy is followed.
ALTERNATIVES AND IMPACTS:Q~
1. Accept the donation of the 1979 van, provide insurance coverage
and repairs, assign unit to Mt. Pleasant Fire Department with
the understanding the Roanoke County Haz-Mat Policy will be
followed. The additional insurance coverage will cost the
County approximately $750.00 per year.
2. Do not accept donation.
`.,. ..
.~ - ~U
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends Alternative 1 with the understanding that this
will be a temporary addition to the fleet and will not be
included in a future replacement request.
Respectfully submitted, Approved by,
~u~...%
Thom s C. F qua Elmer C. Hodge
Chi f of F re & e cue Department County Administrator
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
ACTION - - - - - -
VOTE
Approved (X) Motion by: Bob L. Jonson/Richard No Yes Abs
Denied ( ) W. Robers to approve AlternativeGarrett x
Received ( ) #1 Johnson x
Referred McGraw x
To Nickens Absent
Robers x
cc: File
Thomas C. Fuqua, Chief, Fire & Rescue
Bob Jernigan, Manager, Risk Management
Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance
ITEM NUMBER E _ /
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: March 28, 1989
SUBJECT: Secondary Highway Six Year Construction Plan Establish
Work Session and Public Hearing Dates
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The Secondary Highway Six Year Construction Plan for 1988-94
was approved by the Board of Supervisors in January, 1987. Each
year the Board of Supervisors has the opportunity to review the
priority of the projects. VDOT and County Staff would request
that a work Session and Public Hearing be scheduled.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors set the Work
Session for April 11, 1989, and the Public Hearing for April 25,
1989, for FY89-90 Funding Priorities for Secondary Highway Six
Year Construction Plan.
SUBMITTED BY:
~~
Phillip T. enry, P. E.
Director of Engineerin
APPROVED•
~~~
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
E -/
Approved ( )
Denied ( )
Received ( )
Referred
To
ACTION
Motion by:
VOTE
No Yes Abs
Garrett
Johnson
McGraw
Nickens
Robers
ACTION NUMBER
ITEM NUMBER ~ -~'
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANgKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: March 28, 1989
SUBJECT: Appointments to Committees, Commissions and Boards
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
1. Communit Corrections Resources Board
One-year term of Edmund J. Kielty, Alternate. His term expired
August 13, 1988.
2 League of Older Americans Advisory Board
One-year term of Webb Johnson will expire March 31, 1989.
SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY:
~G( ~~
Mary H. Allen Elmer C. Hodge
Deputy Clerk County Administrator
---------------------------
ACTION VOTE
Approved ( ) Motion by: Yes No Abs
Denied ( ) Garrett
Received ( ) Johnson
Referred McGraw
To• Nickens
Robers
ACTION N0.
ITEM NUMBER ~ ~ ~
AT A IRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKER COUNTY ADMINIOTRATO ON ROENOER
COUNTY, V
MEETING DATE: March 28, 1989
Ar,ENDA ITEM: Appointments to the Court Service Unit Advisory
Council/Youth and Family Services Advisory Board
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
On December 13, 1988, the Board of Supervisors voted to continue
this Board and appoint new members. Michael Lazzuri, Director of
Court Services has contacted the present members of the Court
Service Unit Advisory Council/Youth and Family Services Advisory
Board to determine whether they wished to continue serving.
The following terms expired in 1988 or will expire in 1989.
Appointments to this committee are not made by magisterial
district; however, the magisterial district is listed for each
member.
Two-year term of Jam 1989. TNIoutTroutn has notlsrespondedl to 1Mr~
will expire March 22,
Lazzuri's letter.
Two-year term of Ted R. Powell, Cave Spring Magisterial District,
will expire March 22, 1989. Mr. Powell would like to be
reappointed.
Two-year term of Hoyt C. Rath, Vinton Magisterial District, will
expire March 22, 1989. Mr. Rath does not wish to serve another
term.
Two-year term of Dr. Andrew Archer, Vinton Magisterial District
expired March 22, 1988. Dr. Archer does not wish to be
reappointed.
In addition to the appointments listed above, it is necessary to
appoint four youth members, one each from Cave Spring High
School, Northside High School, Glenvar High School, William Byrd
High School. Mr. Lazzuri recommends that these o PP ment emade rin
from September through September. Therefore, app
G-3
1989 will expire September 1, 1989. Thereafter all terms will
expire September 1, coinciding with the school year.
SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY:
Mary H. Allen Elmer C. Hodge
Deputy Clerk County Administrator
-------------------
ACTION VOTE
Approved ( ) Motion by: Yes No Abs
Denied ( ) Garrett
Received ( ) Johnson
Referred McGraw
Nickens
To• Robers
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 28, 1989
RESOLUTION N0. 32889-5 APPROVING AND
CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH
ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA
FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM I -
CONSENT AGENDA
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That that certain section of the agenda of the
Board of Supervisors for March 28, 1989, designated as Item I -
Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to
each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1
through 7, inclusive, as follows:
1. Approval of Raffle Permit - Mason Cove Fire
Department
2. Adoption of resolution amending resolution 83-43
establishing a policy for use of Community Room.
3. Resolution of Appreciation to recognizing school
food service employees.
4. Acceptance of water and sewer facilities serving
Woodbridge Section 10.
5. Acceptance of water and sewer facilities serving
the Forest Condominiums
6. Resolution supporting the certification of a
judicial vacancy in the General District Court of
the Twenty-third Judicial Circuit.
7. Request for support that the Virginia Employment
Commission be named substate Grantee for the
Dislocated Workers Program.
2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized
and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said
items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to
this resolution.
On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor
Garrett, and upon the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Garrett
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens
A COPY TESTE
Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
3-30-89
CC: Paul Mahoney, County Attorney
Bayes Wilson, School Superintendent
Clifford Craig, Utility Director
Phillip Henry, Engineering Director
Virginia Employment Commission, Roanoke Office
Andrew B. Fogarty, Chief of Staff, Governor's Office
E
ACTION N0. A-32889-5.a
ITEM NUMBER"'-f
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: March 28, 1989
AGENDA ITEM: Request for a Raffle Permit from the Mason Cove
Fire Department
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The Mason Cove Fire Department has requested a Permit for a
raffle to be held on July 30, 1989.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
The application has been reviewed by Commissioner of the Revenue
R. Wayne Compton, and he recommends approval.
SUBMITTED BY:
~~
Mary H. Allen
Deputy Clerk
APPROVED BY:
c'.`
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
--------------------------------------------
ACTION VOTE
Approved (x) Motion by: Bob L. Johnson/Lee Yes No Abs
Denied ( ) Garrett Garrett x
Received ( ) Johnson x
Referred McGraw x
To: Nickens Ab
Robers x
cc: File
Bingo/Raffle File
-/
COUNTY OE ROANOKE, VIRGINIA
COMMISSIONER OF THE REVENUE
APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO CONDUCT RAFFLES OR BINGO
Application is hereby made for a bingo game or raffle permit.
This application is made subject to all County and State laws,
ordinances, rules, and regulations now in force, or that may be
enacted hereafter and which are hereby agreed to by the under-
signed applicant and which shall be deemed a condition under
which this permit is issued.
All applicants should exercise extreme care to ensure the accura-
cy of their responses to the following questions. Bingo games
and raffles are strictly regulated by Title 18.2-340.1 et. sue.
of the criminal statutes of the Virginia Code, and by Section
4-86 et. sec. of the Roanoke County Code. These laws authorize
the County Board of Supervisors to conduct a reasonable investiga-
tion prior to granting a bingo or raffle permit. The Board has
sixty days from the filing of an application to grant or deny the
permit. The Board may deny, suspend, or revoke the permit of any
organization found not to be in strict compliance with county and
state law.
Any person violating county or state regulations concerning these
permits shall be guilty of a Class 1 misdemeanor. Any person who
uses any part of the gross receipts from bingo or raffles for any
purpose other than the lawful religious, charitable, community,
or educational purposes for which the organization is specifi-
cally organized, except for reasonable operating expenses, shall
be guilty of a Class 6 felony.
THIS APPLICATION IS FOR: (check one)
RAFFLE PERMIT ~ BINGO GAMES
Name of Organization ~%Sd ~ ~d~/~ `%~~
Street Address ,~~.9/~,~/~y-uJ ~,1~. f~LS,y ~~ ~ ylS~
Mailing Address ,~/f ~ p,~<~.gl,~ ~J ~ ~~~~f~`'/ li.~- ~y~~3 --~
City, State, Zip Code ~~9-~~,•~ ~/,1 , ..2 y~~S~-~
~- .
Purpose and Type of Organization /~'i /E'£'
When was the organization founded? ~,.-.
1
~~l
Roanoke County meeting place? ~/~£ ~7U1~~
Has organization been in existence in Roanoke County for two con-
tinuous years? YES i/' NO
Is the organization non-profit? YES ~ NO
Indicate Federal Identification Number # ~ -/.--~~'~ ~ -~~ ~~
Attach copy of IRS Tax Exemption letter.
Officers of the Organization:
President:
ff-
%
r.•
~.. f ..
,
o ~ .~
-.: /,~;/}. ~`,.d~=~
Vice-President
.
; , <y , -
Address: ~'~~'l-~ (`..~~s~',,~ ~.:~~ ~_',~, Address: ~°~/ (;.f~„~.,~~ /f.%~y ,~~~~
Secretary: /t,,-,• 1!~7Ly Treasurer: ~~;~-,,•,~,~ ~.fr.~
Address: -~ ~- -
;~ `~ 7 /~;/ "'
,~~. ~;~. ~:,;~ Address: S="s,,r,,."
Member authorized to be responsible for Raffle or Bingo opera-
tions:
Name /'1~~'/" ~ f = d ~ ~,~~.> , ~ : ~ >-a ,~~
Home Address ~'.1~ f; ~ ~~- , {~ ; ~ ~-.1~- ~ •
Phone ~ ~-~ - ~-~`t:; ~ Bus . Phone
A COMPLETE LIST OF THE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF CURRENT MEMBER-
SHIP MUST BE FURNISHED WITH THIS APPLICATION.
Specific locat/ion where Raffle or Bingo Game is to be conducted.
RAFFLES: Date of Drawing ;'~; i.," ~; Time of Drawing -';GGG ~<" - ~ ~~~-~"t~t'
BINGO: Days of Week & Hours of Activity:
Sunday
Monday
Tuesday
Wednesday
Thursday
Friday
Saturday
From To
From To
From To
From To
From To
From To
From To
2
.z-/
State specifically how the proceeds from the Bingo/Raffle will be
used. List in detail the planned or intended use of the proceeds.
Use estimates amounts if necessary. ~/
/7~
o ~ ~~
~ ~ ~;.
3
.~- /
BINGO: Complete the following:
Legal owner(s) of the building where BINGO is to be conducted:
Name:
Address:
County State Zip
Is the building owned by a 501-C non-profit organization?
Seating capacity for each location:
Parking spaces for each location:
ALL RAFFLE AND BINGO APPLICANTS MUST ANSWER QUESTIONS 1 - 19
1. Gross receipts from all sources related to the operation of
Bingo games or Instant Bingo by calendar quarter for prior calen-
dar year period.
BINGO INSTANT BINGO
1st Quarter lst Quarter
2nd Quarter 2nd Quarter
3rd Quarter 3rd Quarter
4th Quarter 4th Quarter
Total Total
2. Does your organization understand that it is a violation of
law to enter into a contract with any person or firm, associa-
tion, organization, partnership, or corporation of any classifica-
tion whatsoever, for the purpose of organizing, managing, or con-
ducting Bingo Games or Raffles? y;
3. Does your organization understand that it must maintain and
file complete records of receipts and disbursements pertaining to
Bingo games and Raffles, and that such records are subject to
audit by the Commissioner of the Revenue? ~>>
4. Does your organization understand that the Commissioner of
the Revenue or his designee has the right to go upon the premises
on which any organization is conducting a Bingo game or raffle,
to perform unannounced audits, and to secure for audit all re-
cords required to be maintained for Bingo games or raffles?
~~~ s
4
~- /
5. Does your organization understand that a Financial Report
must be filed with the Commissioner of the Revenue on or before
the first day of November of each calendar year for which a per-
mit has been issued? ~~•~
6. Does your organization understand that if gross receipts ex-
ceed fifty thousand dollars during any calendar quarter, an addi-
tional Financial Report must be filed for such quarter no later
than sixty days following the last day of such quarter? /~,5
7. Does your organization understand that the failure to file
financial reports when due shall cause automatic revocation of
the permit, and no such organization shall conduct any Bingo game
or raffle thereafter until such report is properly filed and a
new permit is obtained? 'r<-s
8. Does your organization understand that each Financial Report
must be accompanied by a Certificate, verified under oath by the
Board of Directors, that the proceeds of any Bingo game or raffle
have been used for these lawful, religious, charitable, commu-
nity, or educational purposes for which the organization is spe-
cifically cl5artered or organized, and that the operation of Bingo
games or raffles have been in accordance with the provisions of
Article 1.1 of Chapter 8, Title 18.2 of the Code of Virginia?;rps
9. Does your organization understand that a one percent audit
fee of the gross receipts must be paid to the County of Roanoke
upon submission of the annual financial report due on or before
the first of November? t~~
10. Does your organization understand that this permit is valid
only in the County of Roanoke and only at such locations, and for
such dates, as are designated in the permit application?BPS
11. Does your organization understand that no person, except a
bona fide member of any such organization who shall have been a
member of such organization for at least ninety days prior to
such participation, shall participate in the management, opera-
tion, or conduct of any bingo game or raffle, and no person
shall receive any remuneration for participating in management,
operation, or conduct of any such game or raffle? /f=~
12. Has your organization attached a check for the annual permit
fee in the amount of $25.00 payable to the County of Roanoke,
Virginia? !ro la~,t~'c:N.~~~ - N~~ err,. ;,f~- ;; ,;=,j
13. Does your organization understand that any organization found
in violation of the County Bingo and Raffle Ordinance or §18.2-
340.10 of the Code of Virginia authorizing this permit is subject
to having such permit revoked and any person, shareholder, agent,
member or employee of such organization who violates the above to
having such permit revoked and any person, shareholder, agent,
member or employee of such organization who violates the above
referenced Codes may be guilty of a felony? yN;
5
_~~ .~-/
14. Has your organization attached a complete list of its member-
ship to this application form? y~~:
15. Has your organization attached a copy of its bylaws to this
application form? y'~S
16. Has the organization been declared exempt from property taxa-
tion under the Virginia Constitution or statutes? %~s
If yes, state whether exemption is for real, personal property,
or both and identify exempt property. ,~'f>`
17. State the specific type and purpose of the organization.
18. Is this organization incorporated in Virginia? ~(.•';.~
If yes, name and address of Registered Agent:
19. Is the organization registered with the Virginia Department
of Agriculture and Consumer Affairs pursuant to the Charitable
Solicitations Act, Section 57-48 of the Virginia Code? /I/
(If so, attach copy of registration.)
Has the organization been granted an exemption from registration
by the Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Affairs?
;~r3 (If so, attach copy of exemption.)
ALL RAFFLE APPLICANTS DESCRIBE THE ARTICLES TO BE RAFFLED,
VALUE OF SUCH ARTICLES, AND PROCEED TO NOTARIZATION.
Article Description Fair Market Value
~~,, ~,-
6
~-
ALL BINGO APPLICANTS MUST ANSWER QUESTIONS 20 - 27 BEFORE
NOTARIZATION
RAFFLE APPLICANTS, GO TO NOTARIZATION.
20. Does your organization understand that the bingo games shall
not be conducted more frequently than two calendar days in any
calendar week?
21. Does your organization understand that it is required to keep
complete records of the bingo game. These records based on §18.2-
340.6 of the Code of Virginia and X4.98 of Roanoke County Code
must include the following:
a. A record of the date, quantity, and card value of instant
bingo supplies purchased, as well as the name and address of
the supplier of such instant bingo supplies, and written
invoice or receipt is also required for each purchase of in-
stant bingo supplies?
b. A record in writing of the dates on which Bingo is played,
the number of people in attendance on each date, and the
amount of receipts and prizes on each day?
(These records must be retained for three years.)
c. A record of the name and address of each individual to whom a
door prize, regular or special Bingo game prize or jackpot
from the playing of Bingo is awarded?
d. A complete and itemized record of all receipts and disburse-
ments which support, and that agree with, the quarterly and
annual reports required to be filed, and that these records
must be maintained in reasonable order to permit audit?
22. Does your organization
be conducted at such time as
and only at such locations
this application?
23. Does your organization understand that the gross receipts in
the course of a reporting year from the playing of instant Bingo
may not exceed 33 1/3~ of the gross receipts of an organization's
Bingo operation?
24. Does your organization understand it may not sell an instant
Bingo card to an individual below sixteen years of age?
25. Does your organization understand that an organization whose
gross receipts from all bingo operations that exceed or are ex-
pected to exceed $75,000 in any calendar year shall have been
granted tax-exempt status pursuant to Section 501 C of the United
States Internal Revenue Service?
(Certificate must be attached.)
understand that instant Bingo may only
regular Bingo game is in progress,
and at such times as are specified in
7
~7r"- /
26. Does your organization understand that a Certificate of Occu-
pancy must be obtained or be on file which authorizes this use at
the proposed location?
27. Does your organization understand that awards or prize money
or merchandise valued in excess of the following amounts are
illegal?
a. No door prize shall exceed twenty-five dollars.
b. No regular Bingo or special Bingo game shall exceed One Hund-
red dollars.
c. No jackpot of any nature whatsoever shalt exceed One Thousand
Dollars, nor shall the total amount of jackpot prizes awarded
in any one calendar day exceed One Thousand Dollars.
* * * * * * * * * * ~ * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * o
NOTARIZATION: THE FOLLOWING OATH MUST BE TAKEN BY ALL
APPLICANTS
I hereby swear or affirm under the penalties of perjury as set
forth in X18.2 of the Code of Virginia, that all of the above
statements are true to the best of my knowledge, information, and
beliefs. All questions have been answered.
Signed by:
Name
Title
Subscribed and sworn before me,
My commission expires:
RETURN THIS COMPLETED APPLICATION TO:
ir, - !
(..~ ~,~ f,~ : LCi (..~~r.~~ ~'..~ ~ ~!~ VV C;7~-"~ Lek;-~1
r. ,-~°,
6, /
~/
otary Public
COMMISSIONER OF THE REVENUE
P.O. Box 20409
Roanoke, VA 24018-0513
Home Address ~ ~~; ~,= ; , , v : ~
y~
this /~ day of ~/~;') ~ 19 ;~``~'
8
NOT VALID UNLESS COUNTERSIGNED
The above application, having been found in due form, is approved
and issued to the applicant to have effect until December 31st of
this calendar year.
3• ~ ~~ s- w
Date Commiss over of the e enue
The above application is not approved.
Date
Commissioner of the Revenue
9
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGICENTEREON TUESDAYROMARCH 2gUN1g89DMINISTRATION
RESOLUTION 32889-5.b AMENDING RESOLUTION
N0. 83-43 AND ADOPTING A POLICY FOR USE
OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER COMMUNITY ROOM, AND AUTHORIZING
THE ESTABLISHMENT OF RULES AND
REGULATIONS AND A FEE SCHEDULE
WHEREAS, on March 8, 1983, the Board of Supervisors of
Roanoke County, Virginia, adopted Resolution No. 83-43 establish-
ing a policy for the use of the Roanoke County Administration
Center Community Room; and
WHEREAS, occasions over the past years have arisen
which indicate a need for a more detailed policy to assist the
County Administrator and staff to address questions relating to
the use of this facility.
NOW, THEREFORE be it resolved by the Board of Supervi-
sors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That Resolution No. 83-43 is hereby rescinded.
2. That the following rules and regulations governing
the use of the Roanoke County Administration Center Community
Room are hereby adopted:
Rule 1. Permitted Use (in order of priority) and Fee Schedule
A. Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County - No Fee
B. Roanoke County: Departments, Employees, Agencies,
Committees, and Commissions - No Fee
C. State and Federal Government: Officials and Agen-
cies - No Fee
D. Non-governmental: Civic, Cultural, Political,
Religious, and Educational Groups (Application
Necessary) - $50/Day
Rule 2. Permitted Uses As Approved by the Board of Supervisors
A. Social Gatherings (Application Necessary) -
$50/Day
Rule 3. Prohibited Uses
A. Commercial uses
B. Fund-raising uses
Rule 4. No smoking or alcoholic beverages allowed
Rule 5. Groups are not to charge admission or ask for donations
at any meeting.
Rule 6. An "Application for Use of the Roanoke County Community
Room" must be completed as soon as possible prior to
the date of the event for use by 1D and 2A only.
Approval will be by letter.
Rule 7. Applications can be obtained from the following:
Board of Supervisors
3738 Brambleton Avenue
P. 0. Box 29800
Roanoke, VA 24018-0798
Phone: 772-2005
Rule 8. Organizations holding meetings assume responsibility
for any damage to room or contents. The room must be
left in a neat and orderly condition. If additional
cleanup is required, the organization will be notified
and charged for this service. The organization will
2
°~""
indemnify and hold harmless Roanoke County from any and
all claims for damages or injuries arising out of the
use of the Community Room.
Rule 9. Neither the name nor the address of the Roanoke County
Administration Center may be used as the official
address or headquarters of an organization.
Rule 10. No additional furniture or equipment other than that
situated in the Community Room is to be used without
approval.
Rule 11. Use of other equipment is a "Special Request" and per-
mission must be granted in advance.
Rule 12. If the Non-Governmental event (1D or 2A) is held before
or after normal working hours (8 a.m. until 5 p.m.) of
the Administration Center, custodial services will be
arranged for and paid to Roanoke .County General Ser-
vices Department at the rate of $10/hour.
Rule 13. The person requesting the permit for use of the Commun-
ity Room assumes the responsibility for adherence to
~~
"Regulations and Rules for Use of the Community Room,
and either that person or a person especially desig-
nated will be present during the time requested.
Rule 14. These rules are subject to change by the Roanoke County
Board of Supervisors. The County Administrator is auth-
orized by the Board to develop additional rules and
regulations concerning the use, scheduling, and opera-
tion of the Community Room, which are not inconsistent
herewith.
3
1-~-
Special Note:
Rule 15. The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors reserves the
right to alter or amend any previously approved or
scheduled use of the Community Room for governmental
purposes.
3. That the effective date of this Resolution is
April 1, 1989.
On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor
Garrett and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Garrett
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens
A COPY TESTE:
~, ~t~~
Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Paul Mahoney, County Attorney
Mary Hicks, Policy Manual
Constitutional Officers
Assistant County Administrators
Department Heads
4
ACTION #
ITEM NUMBER S~'~'~
AT A VIRGINIAMHELDNATOTHEHROANOKE COUNTYEADMINISTRATIONNOCENTER
COUNTY,
MEETING DATE: March 28, 1989
AGENDA ITEM: Resolution amending Resolution No. 83-43, and
adopting a policy for use of the Roanoke County
Administration Center Community Room, and autho-
rizing the establishment of rules and regulations
and a fee schedule
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
. ~t~.-z,~,~a..r.~
~f~w+~1..G+.4~ti Gf..-f'i ~/ ~/ ~~
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
On March 8, 1983, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, adopted Resolution No. 83-43 which established
a policy for the use of the Roanoke County Administration Center
Community Room. Over the past several years, several occasions
have arisen which indicate that a more detailed written policy
for the use of the Community Room would have been beneficial.
This would assist the County staff in responding to inquiries
concerning the use of this facility.
Last month the County Administrator submitted to the Board
proposed rules and regulations concerning the use of the Commu-
nity Room. This proposal includes permitted uses, uses requiring
Board approval, a fee schedule, prohibited uses, an application
procedure, liability provisions, fee for custodial services, and
authorization for the County Administrator to develop additional
rules and regulations not inconsistent with this proposal.
The attached resolution rescinds Resolution No. 83-43,
adopts as Board policy rules and regulations concerning the use
of the Roanoke County Administration Center Community Room and
establishes an effective date of April 1, 1989.
FISCAL IMPACTS:
(~-
schedule and fee for
making this facility
activities.
It is anticipated that the proposed fee
custodial services would defray the cost of
available to the public for non-governmental
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
.,c~,
It is recommended that the Board favorably consider the adop-
tion of the proposed resolution.
Respectfully submitted,
~~~ , ~~~
Paul M. Mahoney
County Attorney
_____ ------------VOTE--
ACTION
Nn Yes AbS
Approved ( )
Denied ( )
Received ( )
Referred
To
Motion by:
Garrett
Johnson
McGraw
Nickens
Robers
.~. .~.
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGICENTEREON TUESDAYf,OMARCH 28UN1989DMINISTRATION
RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 83-43
AND ADOPTING A POLICY FOR USE OF THE
ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
COMMUNITY ROOM, AND AUTHORIZING THE
ESTABLISHMENT OF RULES AND REGULATIONS
AND A FEE SCHEDULE
WHEREAS, on March 8, 1983, the Board of Supervisors of
Roanoke County, Virginia, adopted Resolution No. 83-43 establish-
ing a policy for the use of the Roanoke County Administration
Center Community Room; and
WHEREAS, occasions over the past years have arisen
which indicate a need for a more detailed policy to assist the
County Administrator and staff to address questions relating to
the use of this facility.
NOW, THEREFORE be it resolved by the Board of Supervi-
sors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That Resolution No. 83-43 is hereby rescinded.
2. That the following rules and regulations governing
the use of the Roanoke County Administration Center Community
Room are hereby adopted:
Rule 1. Permitted Use (in order of priority) and Fee Schedule
A. Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County - No Fee
B. Roanoke County: Departments, Employees, Agencies,
Committees, and Commissions - No Fee
C. State and Federal Government: Officials and Agen-
cies - No Fee
y - .i~
D. Non-governmental: Civic, Cultural, Political,
Religious, and Educational Groups (Application
Necessary) - $50/Day
Rule 2. Permitted Uses As Approved by the Board of Supervisors
A. Social Gatherings (Application Necessary) -
$50/Day
Rule 3. Prohibited Uses
A. Commercial uses
B. Fund-raising uses
Rule 4. No smoking or alcoholic beverages allowed
Rule 5. Groups are not to charge admission or ask for donations
at any meeting.
Rule 6. An "Application for Use of the Roanoke County Community
Room" must be completed as soon as possible prior to
the date of the event for use by 1D and 2A only.
Approval will be by letter.
Rule 7. Applications can be obtained from the following:
Board of Supervisors
3738 Brambleton Avenue
P. 0. Box 29800
Roanoke, VA 24018-0798
Phone: 772-2005
Rule 8. Organizations holding meetings assume responsibility
for any damage to room or contents. The room must be
left in a neat and orderly condition. If additional
cleanup is required, the organization will be notified
and charged for this service. The organization will
~" - .2.
indemnify and hold harmless Roanoke County from any and
all claims for damages or injuries arising out of the
use of the Community Room.
Rule 9. Neither the name nor the address of the Roanoke County
Administration Center may be used as the official
address or headquarters of an organization.
Rule 10. No additional furniture or equipment other than that
situated in the Community Room is to be used without
approval.
Rule 11. Use of other equipment is a "Special Request" and per-
mission must be granted in advance.
R„1P 12. If the Non-Governmental event (1D or 2A) is held before
or after normal working hours (8 a.m. until 5 p.m.) of
the Administration Center, custodial services will be
arranged for and paid to Roanoke County General Ser-
vices Department at the rate of $10/hour.
Rule 13. The person requesting the permit for use of the Commun-
ity Room assumes the responsibility for adherence to
"Regulations and Rules for Use of the Community Room,"
and either that person or a person especially desig-
nated will be present during the time requested.
Rule 14. These rules are subject to change by the Roanoke County
Board of Supervisors. The County Administrator is auth-
orized by the Board to develop additional rules and
regulations concerning the use, scheduling, and opera-
tion of the Community Room, which are not inconsistent
herewith.
Special Note: _-.Z
Rule 15. The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors reserves the
right to alter or amend any previously approved or
scheduled use of the Community Room for governmental
purposes.
3. That the effective date of this Resolution is
April 1, 1989.
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINCENTERLONp,TUESDAROAMARCHC08NT1989MINISTRATION
RESOLUTION 32889-5.c EXPRESSING THE APPRECIATION
OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY
TO FOOD SERVICE EMPLOYEES OF THE
ROANOKE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOL SYSTEM
WHEREAS, the school children of Roanoke County require
nourishing and appetizing food during the course of the school
day in order to maintain their energy at a level sufficient to
promote learning and physical activity;
WHEREAS, the school food service employees of the
Roanoke County Public Schools provide healthy, nutritious meals
and efficient, dedicated service to the students in the County
schools and;
WHEREAS, April 3, 1989, is National Food Service
Employee Recognition Day;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Roanoke County
Board of Supervisors expresses its deepest appreciation and the
appreciation of the citizens of Roanoke County to the school food
service employees of the Roanoke County Public Schools for their
outstanding contributions to the quality of education in Roanoke
County.
On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor
Garrett and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Garrett
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens
A COPY TESTE:
Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Resolutions of Appreciation File
Dr. Bayer Wilson
Polly Holloway, Supervisor, Food Services
ACTION N0.
ITEM NUMBER
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: March 28, 1989
AGENDA ITEM: Resolution of Appreciation recognizing school food
service employees
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
April 3rd has been declared School Food Service Employees
Recognition Day throughout the nation.
As an expression of our support, Supervisor Nickens suggested
that an appropriate resolution of appreciation be adopted by the
Board of Supervisors. He has also suggested that copies of this
resolution be presented to Roanoke County cafeteria workers on
April 3rd.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the attached resolution be adopted by the
Board of Supervisors and that copies of the resolution be
presented to each cafeteria worker on April 3, 1989, School Food
Service Employees Recognition Day.
SUBMITTED BY:
Mary H. Allen
Deputy Clerk
APPROVED BY:
~~
Elmer C. odge
County Administrator
----------------------------------------------------
ACTION VOTE
Approved ( ) Motion by: Yes No Abs
Denied ( ) Garrett
Received ( ) Johnson
Referred McGraw
To• Nickens
Robers
` a- AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 28, 1989
RESOLUTION EXPRESSING THE APPRECIATION OF
THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY
TO FOOD SERVICE EMPLOYEES OF THE
ROANOKE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOL SYSTEM
WHEREAS, the school children of Roanoke County require
nourishing and appetizing food during the course of the school
day in order to maintain their energy at a level sufficient to
promote learning and physical activity;
WHEREAS, the school food service employees of the
Roanoke County Public Schools provide healthy, nutritious meals
and efficient, dedicated service to the students in the County
schools and;
WHEREAS, April 3, 1989, is National Food Service
Employee Recognition Day;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Roanoke County
Board of Supervisors expresses its deepest appreciation and the
appreciation of the citizens of Roanoke County to the school food
service employees of the Roanoke County Public Schools for their
outstanding contributions to the quality of education in Roanoke
County .
~,,
A-32889-5.d
ITEM NUMBER -~-~
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: March 28, 1989
SUBJECT: Acceptance of water and sewer facilities serving
Woodbridge Section 10
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The Developers of Woodbridge Section 10 have requested that
Roanoke County accept the Deed conveying the water and sewer
lines serving the subdivision along with all necessary easements.
The water and sewer lines are installed, as shown on plans
prepared by T. P. Parker and Son entitled Woodbridge Section No.
10, dated February 7, 1989 which are file in the Engineering
Department. The water and sewer line construction meets the
specifications and the plans approved by the County.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The values of the water and sewer construction are
$17,000.00 and $20,000.00 respectively.
RECOMMENDATION:
The staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors accept
the water and sewer facilities serving the subdivision along with
all necessary easements, and authorize the County Administrator
to execute a Deed for the transfer of these facilities.
SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED:
~~~
Phillip T. Henry, P.
Director of Engineering
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
.~- ti
Approved ( ~
Denied ( )
Received ( )
Referred
To
ACTION
Motion by: Bob L. Johnson/Lee
Garrett
V V'1'~
No Yes Abs
Garrett x
Johnson x
McGraw x
Nickens sent
Robers x
cc: File
Phillip Henry, Director, Engineering
Cliff Craig, Director, Utilities
Paul Mahoney, County Attorney
2
.~"
NORTH
g Sewer ~~~~~
Acceptance of Water and Sewer Serving
COMMUNITY SERVICES Woodbridge Section 10
AND DEVELOPMENT 3
A-32889-5.e
ITEM NUMBER '~~ `~
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: March 28, 1989
SUBJECT: Acceptance of water and sewer facilities serving
the Forest Condominiums
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
Dillon and Jackson, Inc. and The Forest Condominium Associates,
the Developers of the Forest Condominiums, have requested that
Roanoke County accept the Deed conveying the water and sewer
lines serving the development along with all necessary easements.
The water and sewer lines are installed, as shown on three sets
of plans prepared by Buford T. Lumsden and Associates entitled
Development Plans for the Forest Condominiums dated February 24,
1984, Development Plans for the Forest Condominiums, Building 4
dated March 18, 1986 and Development Plans for the Forest
Condominiums, Phase VI dated June 12, 1986, which are on file in
the Engineering Department. The water and sewrov dl be
construction meets the specifications and the plans app y
the County.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The values of the water and sewer construction are $18,000 and
$22,500 respectively.
RECOMMENDATION:
The staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors accept the
water and sewer facilities serving the development along with all
necessary easements, and authorize the County Administrator to
execute a Deed for the transfer of these facilities.
Z-5
SUBMITTED BY:
/~~i~~%c~ 1~~~ '`~
Phillip T. H nry, P. .
Director of Engineering
APPROVED:
G t'
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
------------
---------------- VOTE
ACTION
Approved (x) Motion by: Bob L. Johnson/Lee
Garrett Garrett
Denied ( ) Johnson
Received ( ) McGraw
Referred Nickens
To Robers
cc: File
Phillip Henry, Director, Engineering
Cliff Craig, Director, Utilities
Paul Mahoney, County Attorney
No Yes Abs
x
x
x
Absent
x
~ \
s
~ ~~
~ _ ~
_'" .~
"'`s
NORTH
~,.
~i
s~ ~
3 ~
W
2
-~ O
S ~
o °°°`
~_
w
D
~~- a
1 ~~w~
J
0
~~
M,, rya
,.. ~.
COMMUNITY SERVICES
AND DEVELOPMENT
Acceptance of Water and Sewer Serving
The Forest Condominiums
3
~ ~~ (D
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 28, 1989
RESOLUTION 32889-5.f SUPPORTING THE CERTIFICATION
OF A JUDICIAL VACANCY IN THE GENERAL
DISTRICT COURT OF THE TWENTY-THIRD
JUDICIAL DISTRICT
WHEREAS, the Committee on District Courts has considered
certifying a judicial vacancy in the General District Court of
the Twenty-Third Judicial District, upon the election of the
Honorable Diane McQ. Strickland as a Circuit Court Judge of the
Twenty-Third Judicial Circuit; and
WHEREAS, the Honorable Diane McQ. Strickland, one of the
five General District Court judges of the Twenty-Third Judicial
District, has been elected as a Circuit Court Judge of the
Twenty-Third Judicial Circuit by the 1989 Session of the General
Assembly; and
WHEREAS, the General Assembly has heretofore seen fit to
elect five General District Court judges to serve the
Twenty-Third Judicial District which is composed of the City of
Roanoke, the City of Salem, the Town of Vinton and Roanoke
County; and
WHEREAS, failure to certify the vacancy created by the
election of Judge Strickland to the Circuit Court judiciary will
create a backlog of cases and impose an undue hardship upon the
public, Bar and judiciary; and
WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors believes
that it is very important that the Twenty-Third Judicial District
continue to be served by five General District Court judges.
r ,
...L'
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of
Roanoke County as follows:
1. That the Board support certifying the need for five
General District Court judges for the Twenty-Third Judicial
District in order that a successor can be elected to the
Honorable Diane McQ. Strickland.
2. That the Deputy Clerk is directed to forward attested
copies of this resolution to the members of the Committee on
District Court, to the Circuit Court Judges of the Twenty-Third
Judicial Circuit, to the General District Court Judges of the
Twenty-Third Judicial District, to the President of the Roanoke
County/City of Salem Bar Association and to the members of the
General Assembly representing jurisdictions in the Twenty-Third
Judicial District.
On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor
Garrett and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Garrett
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens
A COPY TESTE:
. Q.C.,C,C.Iv
Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: F'il_e
Paul Mahoney, County Attorney
Skip Burkart, Commonwealth Attorney
Members, Committee on District Court
Circuit Court Judges of Twenty-Third Judicial Circuit
General District Judges of Twenty-Third Judicial District
President of Roanoke County/City of Salem Bar Association
Mary F. Parker, Roanoke City Clerk
The Honorable J. Granger Macfarlane
The Honorable Dudley J. Emick, Jr.
The Honorable C. Richard Cranwell
The Honorable G. Steven Agee
The Honorable Clifton A. Woodrum
The Honorable A. Victor Thomas
2
ACTION N0.
ITEM NUMBER
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: March 28, 1989
AGENDA ITEM: Resolution supporting certification of a judicial
vacancy in the Twenty-third Judicial District
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
At their March 13th meeting, the Roanoke City Council adopted a
resolution urging the Committee on District Courts to certify the
need for five General District Court judges for the 23rd Judicial
Circuit, which includes the County of Roanoke. County Attorney
Paul Mahoney received a request that the Roanoke County Board of
Supervisors take similar action.
The Committee on District Courts did certify a judicial vacancy
in the General District Court on March 17, 1989. The attached
resolution expresses support for this decision.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the attached resolution of support be
adopted and that copies be sent to the appropriate persons.
SUBMITTED BY:
m~~~.
Mary H. Allen
Deputy Clerk
Approved ( )
Denied ( )
Received ( )
Referred
To:
ACTION
Motion by: _
APPROVED BY:
~' ~-'
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
VOTE
Yes No
Garrett
Johnson
McGraw
Nickens
Robers
Abs
ITEM N0. -~' ~
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 28, 1989
RESOLUTION SUPPORTING THE CERTIFICATION
OF A JUDICIAL VACANCY IN .THE GENERAL
DISTRICT COURT OF THE TWENTY-THIRD
JUDICIAL DISTRICT
WHEREAS, the Committee on District Courts has considered
certifying a judicial vacancy in the General District Court of
the Twenty-Third Judicial District, upon the election of the
Honorable Diane McQ. Strickland as a Circuit Court Judge of the
Twenty-Third Judicial Circuit; and
WHEREAS, the Honorable Diane McQ. Strickland, one of the
five General District Court judges of the Twenty-Third Judicial
District, has been elected as a Circuit Court Judge of the
Twenty-Third Judicial Circuit by the 1989 Session of the General
Assembly; and
WHEREAS, the General Assembly has heretofore seen fit to
elect five General District Court judges to serve the
Twenty-Third Judicial District which is composed of the City of
Roanoke, the City of Salem, the Town of Vinton and Roanoke
County; and
WHEREAS, failure to certify the vacancy created by the
election of Judge Strickland to the Circuit Court judiciary will
create a backlog of cases and impose an undue hardship upon the
public, Bar and judiciary; and
WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors believes
that it is very important that the Twenty-Third Judicial District
.~ -
continue to be served by five General District Court judges.
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of
Roanoke County as follows:
1. That the Board support certifying the need for five
General District Court judges for the Twenty-Third Judicial
District in order that a successor can be elected to the
Honorable Diane McQ. Strickland.
2. That the Deputy Clerk is directed to forward attested
copies of this resolution to the members of the Committee on
District Court, to the Circuit Court Judges of the Twenty-Third
Judicial Circuit, to the General District Court Judges of the
Twenty-Third Judicial District, to the President of the Roanoke
County/City of Salem Bar Association and to the members of the
General Assembly representing jurisdictions in the Twenty-Third
Judicial District.
MEMBERS OF COMMITTEE ON DISTRICT COURTS
C/o Mr. Robert N. Baldwin
Executive Secretary
Supreme Court of Virginia
100 North Ninth Street
Richmond, VA 23219
Hon. John D. Gray, Chairman
Judge of Eighth Judicial Circuit
P . 0. Box 40
Hampton, Va 23669-0040
Hon. Lawrence Janow
Judge of Twenth-Fourth Judicial District
P. 0. Box 513
Amherst, VA 24521
Hon. Thomas L. Hutton, Jr.
Judge of Twenty-Eighth Judicial District
East Main & Court Streets
Abingdon, VA 24210
Hon. Howard P. Anderson
State Senator and Member of Halifax County Bar
P. 0. Box 847
Halifax, VA 24558
Hon. C. Hardaway Marks
Member of House of Delegates and
City of Hopewell Bar
P. 0. Box 170
Hopewell, VA 23860
Hon. A. L Philpott
Speaker of House of Delegates
P. 0. Box 864
Bassett, VA 24055
Hon. Donald A. McGlothlin, Sr.
Member of House of Delegates
and Buchanan County Bar
Box 909
Grundy, VA 24614
Hon. Hunter B. Andrews
State Senator
and Member of the City of Hampton Bar
16 S. .King Street
P. 0. Box B
Hampton, VA 23669
Hon. Edward M. Holland
State Senator
and Member of Arlington County Bar
P. 0. Box 5622
Virginia Beach, VA 23455
ACTION N0. A-32889-5.g
ITEM NUMBER
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: Request for Support that the Virginia Employment
Commission be named substate grantee for the
Dislocated Workers Program.
AGENDA ITEM:
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The United State Congress has rewritten Title III, Employment and
Training Assistance for Dislocated Workers, of the Job Training
Partnership Act (JTPA) As a result, the Government has has
reconstituted the state Job Training Coordination Council and has
designated the current fourteen service delivery areas as
substate areas for the state. Roanoke County is part of the
Fifth District Employment and Training Consortium.
Another provision of this legislation requires the designation of
substate grantees. The Governor is requesting recommendations
for the area substate grantee from local elected officials,
policy boards and Private Industry Councils. Attached is a
letter from the Governor's Chief of Staff with further
information.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the Virginia Employment Commission be
named the substate grantee for the 5th District Employment and
Training area, and that this recommendation be forwarded to
Andrew B. Fogarty, Chief of Staff for the Governor's Office
~'G9 ~~
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
...L-"`
Approved (~
Denied ( )
Received ( )
Referred
To:
cc: File
ACTION
Motion by: Bob L. Johnson/Lee
Garrett
VOTE
Yes
Garrett x
Johnson x
McGraw x
Nickens
Robers x
No Abs
Absent
i ~J~'
. ~pP.1 ~ ~~:,
~,~~ ~ 7
~. -~.~`~
4~ ~z t /~
`F'..,~.
Gerald L.Baliles
Governor
The Honorable Lee Garrett
Chairman
Board of Supervisors
County of Roanoke
P.0. Box 29800
Roanoke, VA 24018-0798
Dear Chairman Garrett:
Office of the Governor
Richmond 23219
March 10, 1989
You may be aware that Congress has rewritten Title III, Employment and
Training Assistance For Dislocated Workers, of the Job Training Partnership
Act (JTPA) in the Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act of 1988. As required
by the Act, the Governor reconstituted the state Job Training Coordinating
Council. The Governor also received and took the recommendation from the
Council designating the current fourteen service delivery areas as substate
areas for the state.
The Governor, by executive order, will establish a structure at the state
level which is consistent with the manner in which the dislocated workers
program has been administered under Title III of the JTPA. The Governor's
Employment and Training Department will be responsible for communication and
coordination with the United States Department of Labor. The Virginia
Employment Commission will be designated as the state dislocated worker unit,
with administrative responsibility for the dislocated worker program.
Another provision of this legislation requires the designation of
substate grantees. The designation will be made after the Governor consults
with the local elected official(s) of the area, policy boards, and Private
Industry Councils. If agreement cannot be reached wi~h the local elected
officials and Private Industry Councils through this ~nsultation process, the
Act requires the Governor to select the substate grantee<,
S- 7
March 10, 1989
Page 2
Under the new federal law, the following entities are eligible for
designation as substate grantees:
(1) service delivery area grant recipients or administrative entities;
~, (2) local offices of state agencies;
(3) other public agencies, such as community colleges and area vocational
schools;
(4) units of general local government in the substate area, or agencies
of local government;
(5) private nonprofit organizations; and
(6) Private Industry Councils in the substate area.
The federal law also requires substate grantees to use funds to:
° provide basic readjustment services to workers;
° provide training services to workers (including classroom, on-the-fob,
basic and remedial education and literacy); and
° provide needs-related payments (payments made to a worker who does not
qualify for unemployment compensation or who has ceased to qualify for
unemployment compensation and who is in training).
A substate grantee may provide these services directly or through
contract, grant or agreement with service providers.
Please provide your recommendation to the Governor by Marcleaseokeepein
attached sheet for the substate grantee for your area. Also, p
mind that any recort~nendlatersthaneJulyula b989b1e to provide services and be
ready for operation no
If you have any questions, feel free to call either Valorie P. Watkins or
Richard A. Arenstein in the Governor's Office at 786-2211.
Please accept my sincere appreciation for your assistance concerning this
matter.
Very truly yours,
~•
ndrew B. Fog y
Chief of Staf
ABF/dpb
Attachment
cc: Richard Arenstein
Valorie Watkins
-l-
The Honorable Andrew B. Fogarty
Chief of Staff
Governor's Office
State Capitol
Richmond, Virginia 23219
Dear Dr. Fogarty:
The recommendation to the Governor for the substate grantee for the
operation of the Title III+ EmartnershipnActrinnthe substatecareariDislocated
Workers, of the Job Training P
substate area
Name of the
recommended substate grantee
Address
Type of entity
Name of contact person for
recommended substate grantee
Telephone number of contact
person
Signature
Title
K-/
COUN'T'Y OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA
CAPITAL FUND - UNAPPROPRIATED BALANCE
Beginning Balance at July 1, 1988 $12,644
Additional Amount from 1988-89 Budget 50,000
November 22, 1988 Improvements at Administrative Center (6,450)
Balance as of March 28, 1989 56 194
Submitted by ~,
Diane D. Hyatt
Director of Finance
/~' ~ ,~.,
COUN'T'Y OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA
UNAPPROPRIATED BALANCE - GE~RAL FTJND
Balance at July 1, 1988 $3,037,141
August 9, 1988 Dixie Caverns Landfill Cleanup (400,000)
September 13, 1988 Transfer to Board Contingency
(50,000)
September 26, 1988 Design Phase of Spring Hollow (175,000)
Reservoir
October 25, 1988 Funding for Public Information (46,500)
Officer
November 9, 1988 Dixie Caverns Landfill Cleanup (260,000)
November 22, 1988 Lease Additional Office Space (34,783)
February 28, 1989 Primary Election Expenses (23,855)
Balance as of March 28, 1989 52,047,003
Submitted by /,~
Diane D. Hyatt
Director of Finance
~'..~
COUNTY OF ROp,NOKE, VIRGINIA
RESERVE FOR BOARD CONPING'h~1CY
Original Budget at July 1, 1988
$50,000
1988
Tune 28 Funding of Length of Service Benefit
and
e
,
, ,
for Volunteer Fire, Rescu 000)
(9
Auxiliary Sheriff's Deputies ,
(39,405)
July 26, 1988 Tweed's Access Road
September 13, 1988 Add to Board Contingency from 50,000
Unappropriated Balance
September 26, 1988 Beautification of Brambleton Avenue
(3,500)
September 28, 1988 Economic Development Trip to Northern
roved Administratively)
(A
i
i (1,000)
pp
a
n
Virg
October 6, 1988 Typewriter for Clerk of Courts
(Approved Administratively) (966)
October 6, 1988 Economic Development Promotion
istratively)
i
d (1,025)
n
m
(Approved A
October 11, 1988 Safekeeping of Securities
(2,000)
October 20, 1988 Informational Brochure for November
roved Administratively)
(A
ti (6,500)
pp
on
Elec
October 25, 1988 Additional Allocation to Total Action
(TAP)
t (10,000)
y
Against Pover
November 3, 1988 Survey Fees - Safety Cen~eoV~ d
Lab Site (App
i
cs
Forens (2,473)
Administratively)
(1,000)
November 9, 1988 Bushdale Road
(365)
December 13, 1988 C. L. & O. Investors
December 20, 1988 Stonebridge Park Parking Lot
(Approved Administratively) (5,000)
1989
10
uar
J Salaries for Board of Zoning Appeals
(625)
,
y
an 000)
(1
January 24, 1989 Contribution to Arts Festival
,
1989
24
ar Sesquicentennial History Books
(300)
,
y
Janu
X15.841
Balance as of Ma rch 28, 1989
Submitted by
Diane D. Hyatt
Director of Finance
._ --
~-
D
'Z
~ h+
O I--1 V'
.2 y "~
H
{1~ ! iCd
Ow 6 0~.
O OO O
Z V !
V 1--1 Z
V
1 O o
.--1 N N 00 tO O N~~ ~~~ sD N 0~ C I 10
1 ~' 1 M O N M 0 ~ F 1[N'f tND ~ m 1["' f w '~' s0 1 t0
1 U O F I Isa O N e~f 1[a afa M "'~ Y! OHO ~-" ~~ O 0 1 O
1 CL _' O 1 ~ O a-1 .~ ~- ~
1 ~ KJ [a 1 .--i M
VJ 1 7 ~ ~ 1 .-r O
O 1 O 1 va O en ea N N_ N ~ ~ ! .--1 0 07 eo ~-~ ~ N ~Lf ~ 000 oD C- O ~ N ea
1 _ _ _ Ems- _
~ 1 N d ~ ~ ~« G 0 .-+ `~-+ O ~, M N ^" rn M ~ c-- ~ N r ~ .fir e+a ~ sO+a a+f ; e+= O
~ I .~ O x 1 ~ O eo .-~ ~ N ^ f
C4 1 6 CO O 1 en N N O s+a ep ~1' ~ e+f ` M .-+ j ee
1 O y S'. 1 ^ 1
1 Z m o0 1 .-~ '~I' N .-+ '~'
1 ! i N .--1 _ 1 O
1
1 _ _ Cn O F 'r ~ ~ I[i ~ ! ~ N a0 M O 1 ~
_ 1
1 1 ~a 0 os ~Lf oD N u's ~Lf N `n ego ~' O
>~ 1
~ 1 ~ O O
1 _ •--i I[f oo ~ Os ~ ~ M N 0 eNO N O 1 f7
~ 1 O ch N O~~~ !~ rn O a ^~-1 0 u) ~ Oa
~ oa y 1 ~ ~ .-y N O r N N Oa W O ^ ~ ^ ^ N ~ N N ~ ~ T ; Os
~ F N O 1 r~ N~ O O Cn O~~ N~~ ~~ .--i .--i N N T `.~ .-1 N 1 N
CO 1 i N Z 1 ..r N N N 1
W
1 1
~ 1 I .--i _ 1 s~'i .--~ O
O+ 1 1 Cn O spa N O N 00 O o O O O~ 0 0~ 0 ~' 00 !~ O tD r 0 ; ~ Of
1 ('.n 1 0 6 N r' O ^ 0 0 ^ N O ~~ O O O ~~ '~ !` Oa N 1 N p
~ C~'J 1 O 6 ~ A ~ ~ ~ ~ ^' ~ '-~ ~ .~-+ I[O'a N N F '""~ ~ W 1 00 !
~ N 1 ~ O~ .y. N~ '~' 1
1 1 N ~-+
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
m
O 1
O 1
.--1 1
1
1
1
1
1
m
t/]
y m
m p.,
^~ y m
w m
a y y
PO y W Fb
Va ~ P iA
oho '° Ca m o
x
y .:a m m ~ ""
~ ~tl OrJ H Lt] $ O 00 OO OP.^. SJ
y Oya y= p U V E-~ pyp F x z
O P"4 y N FE-a ~~ J 6~ 00 y U O
6"' °' F M ~ 6~ Csm.. d+ OZO H eA 00 o m F F RCS ~R' if
y
a O
F0
PO O CrJ J ..~ i Pa Gam. `i ~. va O U IF-+ "'~ OO Z y V C7 i Y C -.
.~ v] dp ! U C4 a. O ^~ IY. OQO Cw M ^ ~ H OG y ~ m
O!0 m aC 6 h OUn J C0'J Oe. z Omi 6 .tl y d O ~ L1c. y = ~ ~IY.1 F~.
~ d S i 01 d
v~ a~ os va arc ° m F ~ o cv' y m m o °, ~ tr. ~• y -~ i m ei ~
1-+ O 00 "~ S x a ! V U .7U CJ 3f 00 Oa0 1m..1 F O aC
YG YO S .~ u] F S CJ ZO = F H U V F 7s ..~ O 7C
E F O y y 6 0 A N [o O b. a'~ U a" ! O y 0 F
1 1
1 ~ O ~~~ N O~ O~~ N O 1 ~ O
~ ~ ~ 1
~ r+ Ila ~t9 On ~ 0 ~ e0- to es c- `n ~ ~
1 ~ O
1 1
1
x ; 1
1
1
1 N
1 ID ~ ID ~ ~ ~ M t0 ~ ti N ~ 10 !9 ~ M tOD T tG ~ ~ O j ~
_ 1 tD N .r !.O ~ ~ 00 ~ N en t0 O Oa 1 ^
Vl 1 _ O .y. N ea ~ to _ O eD „ N .. _ ^ .-I c+ srf s0 O ~+f ~N-1 1 ~
p 1 .Z 1 W ~ tD ~ v0 oa ti a0 .--1 r ~ ~ se's ~ ~-+ ~ o- 01 N .N-1 ~ ; s'f
H OO O 1 ~' ~ N „y 1 N
V N~1 ; N ~ "i1' 1
! N 1 ~ ~ N ti ti
~~ 1 1
1
Of ~ p e'9 M ~ ~ !^ T N F IL9 ~ s0 CrJ N O ~ N Of ep O H 07 ; H
J OO 57 1 O c'a tD N ~ ti O _ r O N N- Ie's ~ ^ 10 .-~ Of ~--i IaH"1 ..t .-1~ .N0-1 1 ir'!
6 ao F 1 N rn ^' ^ r ea ~` ~ s0~f ~ O e0- ~ N r ti~ N .mow •+a t O
Z
V c+J Z' 1 rn O N Oa O N rt N ~ ah ~ 1 Ili
i 1 .N-~ 1 ~ O .-~ r'f N ""'1 N 1
1 N _ 1 _
~~ 1 _
1 C O ~~~. O ILf O~ B O O Oa O O c_- ~ ^-~1 ~ N s+f 1[9 ~ C ID ~ C 1 ~_
F~ 1 ^
C7 1 tD Oa w ~ O ~ 0 .0--~ N N O CNO N a00 eN- N N tG b ^"~ N ~ N 0 ~ 1 .--1
A 1 .r 1 IaN"a
^~ I O Ics ti O N N .ea ~" C9 1
1 N ea
1
O O
I ;~
;~~;
1 ^ 11
j 0 ii
1 O 11
N
1 11
1 N 11
1 N ,1
~ 11
M 1
1 11
1 .r. 11
~ t0 11
1 11
1 ~
1
1 ~ 11
1 _
I ry 11
1 01
1
1 !D 11
1 ~> 11
1 ^ ~1
N ,1
•r-
~ 11
~ ~ 11
1 N 11
j lD 11
1 ~~ 11
1 r. 11
1
j li
1 11
1 11
j 11
1 1
O
O
O
eo
N O
Oa O
O
p- O
p- 6
rt ~
V9
m
O
N
00 m
v y
6 !
J m
i ~
O =
O ~'
[-.~ m
to
°° va ioJ
0 0_ -~
Cd H ~
! d
i O .0.~
m hc.
t:'t O ~
1~_1y~
y O
vc°.~~
M H
GO
1 11
1 N 11
1 pl 11
1 11
1 ^
j ~ 11
1 M 11
1 N ~~
1 .~
1 II
1 O 11
1 ~ 11
1 ~1 tl
I O n
1 !- 11
j ^ ii
~ ~ 11
M
1 O 11
1 O 11
1
1 ~
1 11
O
1 N '1
1 H
1 `O
j 11 H
O
N ~"
U
H
m
O
H
00
°c
H
m
.°.
"J.
V
i
H
U
vi
N
1
COUNTY OF ROANOg6
STATBMBNT OF BgPBNDITUABS
BIGRT MONTHS BNDBD FEBRUARY 28, 1989
BUDGBT B%PBNDBD
------------ ------------ --- z
---------
GBNBRAL ADMINISTRATION
=
042 S
180
119,783 6q
BOARD OF SUPBRVISOAS ,
961
186
87,532 4T
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ,
206,067 135,735 66
PERSONNBL 554
173 123,755 71
COUNTY ATTORNBY
CONMISSIONBR OF RBVBNUB
,
499,629
321,367
64
61
TRBASUABR 461,441
168,374 280,592
117,572 40
ELBCTIONS 116
86 61,664 T2
SBSQUICENTBNNIAL ,
FISCAL MANAGBMBNT
ASST. CO ADM. MANAGBMBNT SBAVICBS
58,204
37,562 65
58
COUNTY ASSBSSOR
607,691
376
338
354,317
214,517
63
CENTRAL ACCOllNTING ,
212,881 135,713 64
PkOCUABMBNT
052
91
56,535
58
MANAGBMBNT ~ BUDGBT ,
155,600
1 981,767 85
RISE MANAGBMBNT
,
JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION
149,366
15,340
10
CIRCUIT COURT 740
18 6,571 35
GBNBRAL DISTRICT COURT ,
730 311 43
MAGISTRATBS
621
8
3,849 45
J 6. D DISTRICT COURT ,
618
495 305,632 62
CLBRg OF CIRCUIT COURT
' ,
T89
Z88 183,830 64
S ATTORNBY
COMNONilBALTfl ,
175
39 9,836 25
PROBATION OFFICB ,
330
3 1,790 54
VICTIM i4ITNBSS ,
PUBLIC SAFETY
POLICING A INYBSTIGATING
3,983,060
2,461,096
62
11
HIGfl14AY SAFBTY COMMISSION 960
2,228,639 110
1,364,855 61
FIRS
ABSCU6 SQUAD 478,671 282,064 59
BMBRGBNCY SBAVICBS l flAZ MAT RBSPONSB 1
966
880 1,307,781 10
CONFINBMBNT/GARB OF PAISONBRS ,
,
145,638
93,360
64
ANIMAL CONTROL 0 (262
flAZ-MAT RBSPONSB
PUBLIC FACILITIBS
SUPBAINTBNDBNT OF PUBLIC FACILITIBS
104,309
64,648
62
57
STRBBT LIGHTS 1Z5,T88
877
538 91,704
394,035 T3
BNGINBBRING ,
312
190 120,096 63
GBNBRAL SBRYICBS ,
0 586 0
DRAINAGE
BUILDINGS ~ GROUNDS 790,582 454,324 51
59
PARgS l ABCRBATION 953,294
1,658,312 560,532
1,120,862 68
R6FU56
PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION 60,000 37,219 62
61
GROUNDS MAINTBNANCB 857,679 519,518
+ :FINANCIAL STATBMBNTS: PAGB 2 OF 3_,~__
~~
COUNTY OF ROANO~B
STATEMENT OF BgPBNDITURBS
BIGHT MONTHS BNDBD FBBAUARY 28, 1989
HEALTH ASOCIAL SBRYICBS 310
397 287,068 72
PUBLIC HBALTH
SOCIAL SBRYICBS ADMINISTRATION ,
1,T91,157
1,218,122
68
61
PUBLIC ASSISTANCB 802,285
000
36 491,037
12,698 35
INSTITUTIONAL CARE
SOCIAL SBRYICB ORGANIZATIONS ,
104,984
64,988
62
DBYBLOPMBNT 0 0 0
SUPBBINTBNDBNT OF DBVBLOPMBNT 679
307 174,571 57
PLANNING ~ ZONING ,
208
226
160,452 71
BCONOMIC DBVELOPMBNT ,
438
113 ?4,125 65
DBVBLOPMBNT RBYIEY ,
933
17
11,194 62
PLANNING COMMISSION
CONSTRUCTION BUILDING SBRYICBS ,
206,195
131,917
64
NON-DBPARTNBNTAL
ASST. CO. ADM. HUNAN SBRYICBS
LIBRARY
BITBNSION A CONTINUING EDUCATION
BMPLOYBB BBNHFITS
CONTRIBDTIONS TO SBRYICB ORGANIZATIONS
MISCBLLANBOUS
TOTAL
TRANSFERS AND BBSBRVBS
RBIMBURSABLB BgPBNDITURBS
TRANSFBR TO DBBT SBRYICB
TRANSFBR TO INTBRNAL SBRYICB
TRANSFBR TO SCHOOL OPBRATING FUND
TRANSFBR TO DTILITY CAPITAL
TRANSFBR TO CAPITAL PROJBCTS
iRANSGBR TO YOUTH HAVBN
ONAPPROPRIATBD BALANCB
RBSBRYB FOR BOARD CONTINGENCY
TOTAL TRANSFBR ITBMS
GRAND TOTAL
99,286 60,476 61
1,145,612 704,767 62
96,326 46,934 49
741,392 126,507 17
20,000 18,252 91
797,708 78,163
------- --- 10
---------
------------
26,384,209
------------ -----
16,102,313
------------ --- 61
---------
0 (382 0
4,806,542 2,642,559 55
334,876 180,421 54
26,666-,000 12,056,501 45
215,000 143,333 6T
1,643,714 1,095,809 67
75,768 44,198 58
2,105,341 0 0
16,142 0 0
35,863,383 16,162,439 346
----------- ------------ -----------
~ 62,24T,592 S 32,264,752 52
Financial State~ents: Page 3 of 3
~..
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 28, 1989
RESOLUTION 32889-6 EXPRESSING THE APPRECIATION
OF THE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY
TO IDA AND ERNEST ARTHUR FOR THEIR OUTSTANDING
SERVICE TO ROANOKE COUNTY.
WHEREAS, Roanoke County is indebted to its citizens who
offer assistance and support during a disaster situation; and
WHEREAS, such a situation occurred on March 3, 1989,
when a small plane crashed in the Farmington Lakes area,
necessitating many hours of investigation and debris removal by
the Virginia State Police and Roanoke County Fire and Rescue
personnel; and
WHEREAS, Ida and Ernest Arthur opened their home to the
rescue and police personnel, generously offering the use of their
house as a command post and shelter for workers and neighbors who
were unable to use their own homes.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of
Supervisors, on behalf of the personnel involved in the incident
and all the citizens of Roanoke County, expresses deep
appreciation and gratitude to Ida and Ernest Arthur for their
generosity and compassion towards rescue personnel and the
residents of the area.
On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor
Garrett and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Garrett
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens
A COPY TESTE:
~_~~ ~ ~
Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Resolutions of Appreciation File
2
ITEM N0.
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 28, 1989
RESOLUTION EXPRESSING THE APPRECIATION OF THE
THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY TO
IDA AND ERNEST ARTHUR FOR THEIR OUTSTANDING
SERVICE TO ROANOKE COUNTY.
WHEREAS, Roanoke County is indebted to its citizens who
offer assistance and support during a disaster situation; and
WHEREAS, such a situation occurred on March 3, 1989,
when a small plane crashed in the Farmington Lakes area,
necessitating many hours of investigation and debris removal by
the Virginia State Police and Roanoke County Fire and Rescue
personnel; and
WHEREAS, Ida and Ernest Arthur opened their home to the
rescue and police personnel, generously offering the use of their
house as a command post and shelter for workers and neighbors who
were unable to use their own homes.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of
Supervisors, on behalf of the personnel involved in the incident
and all the citizens of Roanoke County, expresses deep
appreciation and gratitude to Ida and Ernest Arthur for their
generosity and compassion towards rescue personnel and the
residents of the area.
~~'_ ~7
PETITIONER: WILLIAM AND EUGENIA BALL
CASE NCA~IBER: 13-3/89
Planning Carmission Hearing Date: March 7, 1989
Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: March 28,_1989
A. RD~UEST
Petition of William and Eugenia Ball to amend the future land use map designation
of a 1.23 acre tract from Development to Transition and to rezone said property
from R-1, Residential to B-1, Business to operate medical offices in an existing
structure at 3511 Ogden Road in the Cave Spring Magisterial District.
B. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION
There was no opposition to the request.
C. SIGNIFICANT IMPACT FACTORS
1. Street Capacities: Using ITE trip generation rates for general office uses,
staff estimates this proposal would generate approximately 102 vehicle
trip-ends per day. This figure is based on trip generation estimates per 1,000
sq.ft. of gross building area. Recent traffic counts on Colonial Avenue
revealed an ADT of approximately 11,344 north of its intersection with Ogden
Road and 11,637 south of the intersection. In 1986, ADT on Ogden Road, between
Colonial Avenue and Roanoke City corporate limits, was approximately 7,832.
VDOT advises that plan to improve the eastern end of Ogden Road, fran Route 419
to the city corporate limits, are underway at this time.
2. Circulation: Proffered concept plan denoted only one point of access to
Colonial Avenue. The proposed access drive is located as far as possible from
the existing intersection. Turning movements resulting from ingress and egress
to the site could pose a problem for vehicles traveling on Colonial Avenue.
Internal circulation is adequate.
3. signage: Petitioners have not proffered any conditions which restrict the type
or amount of signage permitted on site. Staff suggests the petitioners proffer
conditions restricting signage to one monwnent sign, not to exceed 40 sq.ft.
D. PROFFERED CONDITIONS
1. The rezoned parcel will be used for the construction and operation of medical
offices for the practice of family medicine. The current building on subject
property will be retained and an addition built in the same style will be adder
to the rear of said existing building.
2. The medical practice will be limited to no more than three physicians.
3. The development of the property will be in substantial compliance with the
concept plan submitted with the application for rezoning.
4. The small evergreen trees shown as a part of type C buffer will be at least
five feet in height at planting and will be placed in a staggered manner of
each side of the fence. The fence shown as a part of the type C buffer will be
constructed of wood and will be at least six feet in height and will be i~
place prior to the commencement of construction of the site.
5. All trees and natural vegetation will be saved as possible.
6. Outside lighting at the building will be residential in appearance, and the
lights and poles will not exceed 10 feet in height. Parking lot lighting wil:
not exceed five feet in height.
7. Total signage shall not exceed 50 sq.ft.
E. ~ISSIONER'S MOTION, VOTE AND REASON
Mr. Witt moved to approve the amendment to the Land Use Plan map.
carried with the following roll call vote:
py~; Robinson, Massey, Winstead, Gordon, Witt
NAYS: None
ABSENT: None
The motion
Mr. Witt moved to approve the petition with proffered conditions. The motion
carried with the following roll call vote:
py~; Robinson, Massey, Winstead, Gordon, Witt
~yS; None
ABSENT: None
F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE
None.
G . ATI~1CHNIEET1r.CS
~/ Concept Plan (8~" x 11")
Vicinity Map (8~" x 11")
Staff Report
Other Attachment A
..~,,,u~.,~,-., r~
Terrance Harrington cretary
Roanoke County Pla ing Commission
- 2 -
~~'~:
~ ~~ ::88
F~7
S~ 1 e
Si! =ili~ ~
~
~ l
~
~
?
~ 9
u
!`! ~.~
;
~
'i` :'-
~ ~ ~' j
~ ~ Yil~ !!~~! ii~ 9
~~
~~
~~
3 ~~
. ~' ~
~]Z
e 9
~~ :fig ~
~~ ~
3~
t
``~
~' ~ ; i
~ ;~
z ~.
e~ :.
i'
,
r~ei`'~
xa
J ~
i <~ ~~
t mr ~`
F:
v
~~ ;qq
~ .
j~~g~:g
h
~~'~1
3 ~ jq~
~ `~`~~~
~
9
u ao ;;~
~-
:~
,~
3
~~
r
~ ~
N
~- s
CO r~~`
,~
~ ~ ~
i ~`
3 ~
+r
1 ~~~ ' ~
1 ,1 y~,
~ + ~~,~_
.SW'
UE
Cp~pN~p'U AvEN~s°
YA- SEC• A~
VApAl~
,~
,~
,~
iJ
P
J
- 3 -
~~ ~~
STAFF REPORT
PETITIONER: William F. Ball
.,ASE NUMBER: 13-3/89 DATE: March 7, 1989
REVIEWED BY: Dale Castellow
Petition of William and Euacreatract frommDevelopmentuto Land Use
map designation of a 1.23 ro erty from R-1, Residential to
Transition and to rezone said p p structure
B-1, Business to operate medical offices in an existing
at 3511 Ogden Road in the Cave Spring Magisterial District.
1. NATURE OF REQUEST
a. Conditional request to rezone a 1.23 acre parcel from R-1,
Residential to B-1, Business. Petitioner proposes to
expand an existi256tsquarerfeetntoeoperate aefamilye by
approximately 2,
medical practice.
b. Attached concept plan and zoning vicinity map describe the
project more fully.
2, APPLICABLE REGULATIONS
Residential.
a. The proposed site is currently zoned R-1,
The petitioner is requesting that the site be rezoned to
B-1, Office District. The B-1, Office District permits a
variety of office uses including professional offices,
financial offices, including banks and real estate
agencies, dental and medical offices and clinics, and
various other general office uses. Restaurants,
pharmacies and retail sales to serve occupants and patrons
are permitted as long as they do not exceed 10~ of the
gross floor area. In addition, two-family and multifamily
dwellings are permitted within the B-1, Office District.
b. Petitioners have proffered conditions ensuring ti) that
the property will be used as a professional medical
office; (2) that not more than 3 physicians will conduct
business on the site; and (3) that the property will be
developed in substantial conformity with the attached
concept plan dated January 26, 1989.
c. If approved, site plan review will be required to ensure
compliance with County regulations.
d, A commercial entrance permit will be required from VDOT.
3. SITE CHARACTERISTICS
a. Topography: Moderately sloping to the north toward Colonial
Avenue and Ogden Road.
b. Ground Cover: An existing single-family dwelling.
- 5 -
.~ S~ ~~
4. AREA CHARACTERISTICS
a. Future Growth Pin°rArea. SThistareaihasnbeen designatedgfor
Community Plann g
stable growth. Urban services are available.
b. General area indduses~peA multisbuildingdofficefcomplex was
residential la
recently approved for the adjoining parcel on Ogden Road
immediately wesex hash beentapprovedsfortthenvacant4parcel
apartment compl
north of this site on the opposite side of Colonial Avenue.
5. LAND USE IMPACT ASSESSMENT
Rating: Rate each USetarscalerdi~hroughh5,lmpact of the
proposed action. ne ligible impact, 3 manageable
1 = positive impact, 2 g = severe impact, and N/A not
impact, 4 disruptive impact, 5
applicable.
COMMENTS
RATING FACTOR
LAND USE COMPATIBILITY
3 a. Comprehensive slarea withinoapDevelopmentelandpuset Plan
has placed thi
category. Although the land use compatibility matrix
identifies office uses as moderately compatible within
areas designated as Development, the plan does not
differentiate office uses as a desirable land use type
except when developed as part of a "Planned Community
"
Development. To satisfy the "Flanned Community
Development" provision a minimum of 25 acres is generally
required.
As part of this request, the petitioners are requesting an
amendment to the Land Use Map designation from Development
to Transition. The Transition land use category differen-
tiates planned office parks as a desirable land use type.
The Pain ptosthebfollowingcfactorsf Transition areas
accor g
* Hi hwa fro~e~ As prescribed by the plan, this site
maintains direct frontage and access to an arterial
street.
* Land Use Pat_ tern: The plan prescribes locations where a
strip pattern of development has occurred or where future
development pressures may cause such patterns to occur.
This site is situated on the corner of Ogden Road and
Colonial Avenue. A single family subdivision abuts the
site to the east and a multi-building office complex has
been approved for the parcel immediately south of the
site on Ogden Road. oBtsthisnrequestcation, this factor
would appear to supp
- 6 -
~~~- ~
* Exi_s_ting Zonin s wherelstri pecommercialezoningihasof
transition area
occurred. Although this site is currently zoned R ,
Residential, a simecentlyszonedeB-latoeaccommodatelanwest
of this site was r
office proposal.
Surrounding Land Use: As previously stated, this site is
situated on the family reso dencesoto the eastnand thenue.
It abuts single
proposed office complex to the wesroved for thetparcel
apartment complex was recently app
north of the site across Colonial Avenue.
Tooogra hY: As prescribed by the
physically oriented toward Ogden
from the rear towards Ogden Road.
* Ur_ ban Sector: And
the urban service
plan, this site is
Road. The site slopes
finally, this site is situated within
area.
c. Neighboring Area: Thelireresidentialpecommercialgandfinsti-
residential, multifam Y
tutional land uses.
d. Site Layout: Attscandaddition ofaapproximatelyo2f256dsquare
Proposal include
feet of officeonPcompletioneXtheicomplexlwouldibe
structure. Up
approximately 4,180 square feet in size. Access is
available from Colo~ionervhasenotlprofferedianylconditions
adequate. The pets Since the site abuts three
pertaining to on-site lighting.
single family rensdlimitingt the heighttandhintensitynof any
proffer conditlo
outdoor lighting erected on the site.
cept plan, the
3
3
2 e. Architecture: Based on the proffered con
height and sadvise thatptheoproposedcexpansiontwould be of
Petitioners
materials similar to the existing structure.
g f. Screening and Landscaping: As per the zoning ordinance,
- „Type C" screening and buffering is required when office
uses abut single fforleitherdanbuffersyard ofelSTfeetCwith
requirement calls
b foot screen and smealeeofrsmall evergreenatreeseandaoneo
25 feet and with a h g
row of evergreen shrubs.
3 g. Amenities: Proffered concept plan includes 20 parking19
- stalls. Baseduiredhbysordinancee pTheoproposedllocation of
stalls are req
trash dumpsters Laffnsuggestsdthegpetitionersedesignate the
concept plan. S
location of any dunpsters on the concept plan.
- 7 -
3 h. Natural features: Tsebsiseveralatreeslandclowngrowing the
adjoining residence Y
underbrush. Where feasible, staff recommends the
petitioner prOndenaturaltvegetationion siteervation
of the trees a
TRAFFIC
4 i. Street Capacities: sUsstaffTestimatesnthislproposal would
general office use _
generate approximately 102 veheneration estimatesdper
This figure is based on trip g
1,000 square feet Colonial Avenuen revealed ancADT of
traffic counts on
approximately 11,344 north of its intersection with OADTn
Road and 11,637be~WeenoColonialtAvenueiand the Roanoke
on Ogden Road,
City corporate limits, was approximately 7,832. VDOT
advises that plan9 to therRoanoke Cityecorporate Olimits,
Road, from Rt. 41
are underway at this time.
Circulation: Proffered concept plan denotes only one point
4 7-
of access to Colonial Avenue. The proposed access dr ve
is located as far as possible from the existing
intersection• thersite couldeposerasproblemffor vehicles
and egress to
traveling on Colonial Avenue. Internal circulation s
adequate.
~JTILITIES
2 k. Water: Adequate supply and distribution.
2 1. Sewer: Adequate treatment and transmission.
DRAINAGE
2 m. Basin: No problems noted.
3 n. Floodplain: PrOpOnatedlby thenFederaltEmergency Management
hazard area desig
Association.
PUBLIC SERVICES
2 0. Fire Protections Within established service standard.
2 p. Rescue: Within established service standard.
p/A q. Parks and Recreation:
N/A r. School:
- 8 -
~-~
TAX BASE
1 s. - Land and Improvement Values 5325,000
- Taxable Gross Sales/Year:
- Total Employees: 10
- Total revenue to the County/Year'NewpRevenueelS3$740
ENVIRONMENT
2 t. Air:
2 u. Waters
2 v. Soils:
2 w. Noise:
4 x. signage: Petitioners have
_ which restrict thestspther
site. Staff sugg
restricting signage to one
square feet.
not proffered any conditions
amount of signage permitted on
petitioners proffer conditions
monument sign, not to exceed 40
6, PLAN CONSISTENCY
This area is designathe Developmentelandnuseecategorys Future
Land Use Plan map. T
differentiates variousdesienatedeasoDevelopmental Theelopment
as desirable in areas g
petitioners areomrDevelopment toaTransition.la0ffice
designation fr
developments, such as this proposal, are encouraged in areas
designated as Transition. (See item "a" above.)
7, STAFF EVALUATION
a. Strengths: i1) Petitioner has proffered conditions ensuring
that the developmeconcept planrdatedu Januarya26COl9ggmity
with the attached lan denotes only one point of access
t2) Proffered concept p
to Colonial Avenue.
b, Weaknesses: (1) The petition is not consistent with the
land policies setou?dtpose problemsrforavehiclesltraveling
Proposed access c
on Colonial Avenue.
ested Proffers: (1) Staff suggests the petitioners
c. Sugg
proffer conditieed 40ssquarenfeetgna(2)tStaff suggests thee
sign not to exc
petitioners prerected atlaiheightsandnintensity that will
lighting will
not impact adjoining residences. (3) Staff suggests the
petitioners designate the locWhere feasibleumstaffs on the
proffered concept plan. (4)
recommends theofpthettrees andf naturaldvegetationuonnsite.
preservation
- 9 -
-~
AMENDMENT OF THE ROANOKE COTJNTY LAND USE PLAN
Before the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County;
A 1.231 acre parcel of land, generally located on the North
side of Ogden Road at 3511 Ogden Road within the Cave Spring
Magisterial District, and recorded as parcel #77.11-1-57 in
the Roanoke County Tax Records.
PETITION
To the Honorable Supervisors of Roanoke County:
WHEREAS, your Petitioners, William F. Ball and Eugenia
H. Ball, respectfully file this petition in accordance with
the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended, and would
respectfully show the following:
1) The Petitioners own the above referenced property.
2) The property is designated Development in the
Future Land Use Guide of the Roanoke County
Comprehensive Development Plan.
3) Your Petitioners now desire to redesignate this
property as Transition.
Respectfully submitted,
WILLIAM F. BALL and EUGENIA H. BALL
By (.~1 ~L~~•~
.Counsel for Petitioners
RECOMMENDATION
WHEREAS, the Petitioners were referred to the Planning
Commission, which after proper legal notice required by
section 15.1-431 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as
amended, held a public hearing on March 7, 1989. Whereas
all interested persons were afforded an opportunity to be
heard. The Planning Commission recommends to the County
Board of Supervisors that the above referenced parcel of
land be redesignated from Development to Transition in the
Future Land Use Guide of the Roanoke County Comprehensive
Development Plan on the following recorded vote:
Motion of Don Witt
AYES: Robinson, Massey, Winstead, Gordon, Witt
NAYS : None
ABSENT: None
Respectfully submitted,
By:
Secr tary, Roanoke unty Planning Commission
FINAL ORDER
,.38~j_ y
WHEREAS, after full consideration at the public hearing held on March 2 8
19 89 , the Board of County Supervisors determined that the amendment to the Future
Land Use Guide of the Roanoke County Comprehensive Development Plan be
Granted on 3/28/89
NOW, THEREE'ORE, BE IT ORDERID that the aforementioned parcel of land, which is
contained in the Roanoke County Tax Maps as Parcel 77.11-1-57 and recorded
in Deed Book 1297 page 1639 and legally described below, be redesignated
rn
00 from Development ~ Transition
~ Legal Description of Property:
M
BEGINNING at a point on the north side of Ogden
Road, S. W., corner to the land of the Knights of
•• Pythias of Roanoke, Va.; thence with the north side
W of Ogden Road, S. W., N. 74° 09' 07" W. 83..86 feet.
E, to a point; thence continuing with the north side of
o Ogden Road, S. W.~, N. 63° 39' 95" W. 153.52 feet to
v a point; thence N. 16° 15' S0" W. 67.92 feet to a
o point on the east side of Colonia]. Avenue, S. W.;
H thence with the east .side of Colonia] Avenue, S. W.,
~ N. 29° 43' 19" E. 174.08 feet to a point on the east
side of Colonial Avenue, S. W., corner to Lot 5,
w Ogden Hills; thence S. 51° 27' E. 294.05 feet to a
~ point; thence S. 32° 28' W. 147.37 feet to the PLACE
o OF BEGINNING, containing 1.231 acres according to a
a plat of survey by T. P. Parker & Son, Engineers &
~ Surveyors, Ltd., dated October 12, 1988,
• BE IT FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this order be transmitted to the Secretary
of the Planning Commission and that the Land Use Plan: Future Land Use Map be
changed accordingly.
ADOPTED on motion of Supervisor ____ Robers and upon the
following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson,'Robers, McGraw, Garrett
~yS; None
~E~' Supervisor Nickens
- 10
~}'j~~- ~ , C ~.f-~-~-h Deputy Clerk
cc : File ~_r~,r,
Arnold Covey, Director,RQ~~~~c ~a~~~sti~sors
Terry Harrington, Director, Planning
John Wi]1ey, Director, Real Estate Assessment
VIRGINIA:
BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY
A 1.231 acre parcel of land, )
generally located on the north j
side of Ogden Road at FINAL ORDER
3511 Ogden Road within the )
Cave Spring Magisterial District, )
~ and recorded as parcel 77.11-1-57 )
~ in the Roanoke County Tax Records. )
0
M TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY:
WHEREAS, your Petitioners, William F. Ball and
~~` Eugenia H. Ball, did petition the Board of County
Supervisors to rezone the above-referenced parcel from R-l,
w Single Family Residential District to B-l, Office with
H
2 Conditions District, for the purpose of constructing an
0
U
p operating medical offices.
N
cn WHEREAS, after due legal notice, the Board of
~ County Supervisors did hold a public hearing of the petition
w
~ on March 28, 1989, at which time, all parties in interest
a
a,
~ were given an opportunity to be heard; and
WHEREAS, after full consideration at the public
hearing held on March 28, 1989, the Board of County
Supervisors determined that the rezoning be granted with
conditions proffered.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDERED that the
aforementioned parcel of land, which is contained in the
Roanoke County Tax Maps as Parcel 77.11-1-57 and recorded in
Deed Book 1297, Page 1639, and legally described below, be
rezoned from R-l, Single Family Residential District to B-l,
Office with Conditions District.
- 11 -
Legal Description of Property:
3&~ - `~
BEGINNING at a point on the north side of Ogden
Road, S. W., corner to the land of the Knights of
Pythias of Roanoke, Va.; thence with the north side
of Ogden Road, S. W., N. 74° 09' 07" W. 83.86 feet
to a point; thence continuing with the north side of
Ogden Road, S. W., N. 63° 34' 45" W. 153.52 feet to
a point; thence N. 16° 15' S0" W. 67.92 feet to a
point on the east side of Colonial Avenue, S. W.;
thence with the east side of Colonial Avenue, S. W.,
N. 29° 93' 19" E. 174.08 feet to a point on the east
side of Colonial Avenue. S. W., corner to Lot 5,
Ogden Hills; thence S. 51° 27' E. 294.05 feet to a
point; thence S. 32° 28' W. 147.37 feet to the PLACE
OF BEGINNING, containing 1.231 acres according to a
plat of survey by T. P. Parker & Son, Engineers &
Surveyors, Ltd., dated October 12, 1988.
BE IT FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this order be transmitted to the Secretary
of the Planning Commission and that he be directed to reflect that change on the
official zoning map of Roanoke County.
Robers and upon the
ADOPTED on motion of Supervisor
following recorded vote:
AYFS: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Garrett
~'YS' None
ABSENT:
Supervisor Nickens
Deputy Clerk
cc : File Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
Arnold Covey, Director, Development & Inspections
Terry Harrington, Director, Planning
John Wi]Jey, Director, Real' Estate Assessment
- 12 -
~`.,` .~
rn
w
0
M
N
z
w
H
2
0
U
O
H
Q
W
0
a
a
w
BIRD, KINDER
& HUFFMAN
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
R OANOK E. VIRGINIA
VIRGINIA:
BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY
A 1.231 acre parcel of land, ) AMENDED
generally located on the North ~ PRO FERFFERF
side of Ogden Road a'c ) ~F
3511 Ogden Road within the CONDITIONS
Cave Spring Magisterial District, )
and recorded as parcel 77.11-1-57 )
in the Roanoke County Tax Records. )
TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY:
Being in accord with Section 15.1-491.1 et seq. of
the Code of Virginia and Section 21-105E of the Roanoke
County Zoning Ordinance, the Petitioners, William F. Ball
and Eugenia H. Ball, hereby voluntarily proffer 'co the Board
of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia the following
conditions to the rezoning of -the above-referenced parcel of
land:
1. The rezoned parcel will be used for the
construction and operation of medical offices for the
practice of family medicine. The current building on
subject property will be retained and an addition built in
the same style will be added to the rear of said existing
building.
2. The medical practice will be limited to no more
than three (3) physicians.
3. The development of -the property will be in
substantial compliance with the concept plan submitted with
the application for rezoning.
- 13 -
,,.
4. The '°srnall evergreen trees°' shown as a part of
"Type 'C' Buffer" will be at least five (5) feet in height
at planting.
pe C
5 . The '° fence" shown as a part of the "°Ty
Buffer" will be constructed of wood and will be at least six
(6) feet in height, and will. be in place prior to the
commencement of construction of the site.
6. The "small evergreen trees" will be placed in a
staggered manner on each side of the °'fence".
7. All trees and natu_~al vegetation will be saved
as possible.
8. Outside lighting at the building will be
residential in appearance, and the lights and poles will not
exceed ten (10) feet in height.
9. Parking lot lighting will not exceed five (5)
feet in height.
10. Signage will be limited to fifty (50) square
feet and will be substantially as shown on Exhibi'~ "A"
attached.
Respectfully submitted,
WILLIAM F. BALL
EUGENIA H. BALL
By:
Counsel for Pe ition
Carr L. Kinder, Jr., Esquire
BIRD, K-~°I}JER & HUFFMAN
P. O. Box 2795
Roanoke VA 24001
s/G162
- 14 -
.~8y_ y
-~
~~
0
C?~>
D
~i
~J
~~
__-_---~
.~_-- - ;~
~_-~
~!
_,
--,
~~
n
o .C'J
I '--' I
~i
/~/ p
r~~,J
~ ~l
~-,.
~r
a ~ ~°_' i
'~o ~~~
1
~i
o
Ll~_. ~
C~ ~
~ __..~~
~___I ~ -
n
I~ I I I~
t_-~Iu
r=-I I ,~_~_~I
~-~--~
--~ ~-- .
iIl
-~
~~
C1;1 ~
.~
i ~
I Z
~,
S
C~
d
J
iI
- 15 -
jV~t~t~ytii~~~`~~iyfYil~~iir~~~~i'~i~~11~if~ri`r'ti~rtlii~l~i~1Yi~~fii~rli'~i~u~l~~i'it1i~~~il~iiii~~r~lit~~rl~~Tlu~~~~~iilitt~r~li'Irlirr~lu~11~~
_ ..~ _
- -
- -
- -
APPEARANCE RE QUE S -
_ -
- _
- -
- ~, _
- ~. -
_ ~ .
u.. h-~~
_ AGENDA ITEM NO. 3 ~ -' (d
- -
6~~ _
e Zu ,NG- ~ ~ 2 - _
-_ SUBJECT
I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to
_ -
recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter
= WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM,
-- so that I may comment.
_ I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FORTH
- RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINE
__ LISTED BELOW.
h s Baker will be iven between three to five minutes to comment
• Eac p g
-_ whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will
decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue,
'- and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to
do otherwise. :
• S Bakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Ques-
_ p
Lions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman.
• All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized
_ speaker and audience members is not allowed.
__
• Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times.
c • are re uested to leave any written statements and/or comments
Speakers q
with the clerk.
• INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED
'- GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION
_ FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT
=_ THEM.
_ PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO DEPUTY CLERK
__
c NAM
-_
= ADDRESS G ~ ~'~ 21S S~ ~ ~ ~ `~c~ ~
'" PHONE ~ Z ` / ~ S~
miillllliiillllllilllllllllllllllllillllllllllllilillllllllllillllllllllllllilillllllllllllllllllllilllllilllllllllllllllllllll
PETITIONER: iP,CK/8BESS
CASE NCRRBER:
Planning Cormtission Hearing Date:. March 7, 1989
Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: March 28, 1989
A. Rff,~UEST
Petition of Jack BessofficeeZnnan existing structure,~located ate54221Stakey
Business to operate an
Road in the Cave Spring Magisterial District.
B. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION
Clark Crowley inquired about the present zoning of the property and the maximum
parking allowed.
C. SIGNIFICANT IMPACT FACTORS
1. Comprehensive Plan: 1985 Comprehensive Deve op!nnenct Pusesaa peaof moderate
within a Development land use category.
compatibility when incorporated in a planned residential development, but are
not encouraged as freestanding land uses. On this basis, this site os de of
inconsistent with the land use plan map and policies. On the oppo
Starkey Road, the area is within a Transition land use category, where office
uses are encouraged, although Policy TR-5 discourages conversion of detached
residences to offices unless part of a unified developmSn~re Theere off c s
fifty feet south of this property, the land use category
are encouraged, subject to certain policies related to site design. Should
this petition be approved, a staff initiated land use plan amendment will be
submitted.
D. PROFFERED CONDITIONS
1. Professional offices only with only one entrance on Starkey Road.
2. Property shall be used for professional offices only.
3. Type C screening and buffering shall be provided.
4. Total signage on the property shall not exceed 100 sq.ft. No freestanding
signage shall be allowed on the property.
5. All parking shall be located behind the front line of the house.
6. Total building floor area shall not exceed 6,000 sq.ft. and height shall be
limited to 2-~ stories.
E. COr'A'IISSIONER' S MOTION, VOTE AND REASON
Mr. Witt moved to approve the petition with proffered conditions. The motion
carried with the following rWinstead, Gordon, Witt
py~; Robinson, Massey,
NAYS: None
ABSENT: None
F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE
None.
G. ATr CHMENTS
Concept Plan (8~" x 11")
Vicinity Map (8~" x 11")
Staff Report
Other
a
Terrance Harrington, cretary
Roanoke County Plann' g Ca~nission
i
BINDING EDGE
~ A..c~ L! of`~
~ 8Q. ~S9 Lal /0 1~... _
//O.00 now
stow //0.00 we
col Z Lof 3 ~ L'_ol ¢ Lvl 5
1 /.05 I~cRE /. // QcRE SECr,o~/ Z
• W 3 MAP of
Li ~n ~ 4 ~ $odJ//E.Qn/ ~/.1/E5
O v~ h
~ p ~ +1j ~ o ~gECORofo /~/
~ `~ ~ ~ 4 ~ P.9. z PG. /38
~ V. ~ ~1 Ro.I~/orfE cov./j/
~ i
I
Cn/v~~t /Jaot.~
(,~,q.~ce PoRiN to
O./f 5/oR /
rar c.,/ocrT D[acK
~ ie, ~ .vOi/56
~--- ~ 5412
~(AC AMT
119.2 iC' i,y 40. a GO.!
!I I a Y M
u6.1 ~~ ~1 L•
~'
I/fLL~ ~Q
IIIII
~
y
\ ~
v a ~i; b
,~,,,T,
Piece ~~~ t~rpi v
I
~
~ ~
`
--= 149.IO~ ` `
s[ccor eP~ o: \
M.
77. Go
NBo•59• t~~a
y
-- N. 3i•/o.E
i/olE % CAPlio,/ PROPER// /5
A/o, Lot.IT~o /•~ '~ SPEC/AL FLDOo
SE R l'4~y O~ /~O~s NG A o~ !/R9-INE
QEVEL oPti1E~/r
/~.f
w
~- aG•E- ~~~~,..
r3S. /o Tl~[ ~aT.
sl'4~~`SEy ,p
Fo R o•4,p ~ ~4
R~/.r
PLAT
RAYMOND C. WEEKS '~'
~',~„T,.,...E e . ~..~'~
CERT. N0.
54.173(a)802 0
~/~~E V LAND 9J~
~`
_J'
of SURV[Y
M/10E FoR
.) OHtJ M. PEDIGO , AZIORNEY
SHOWING PROPERTY OF
M I CHAE1..J. NEAZON E,~ PINA S. HEAYON
/3E~NG Lojs 3& ~~ SEcT/o./ ? , ti1~~ of SouJ-.4cgN P/1•ES
~`'54Z2 Slvrs~ftE~' F~o,~o
- 2 -
DATt~ O cT• 9 , 19 60
w wAYMOHQ G. W[tK•
.T~TI CI.Tl/Il0 •I~NO IYNYlTO~
YIR6lNIA
~GAL.SI 1" a /v 4'
to
~~
` `1
"`
/ ~ 4
s~• •
woer Gawy cow. Q , °
e ~•• i ~~ SN MoP p.19
o ~ ..
~ ~ Ywr/ A 17
/ ~~ 1'•so' gg % RE
~ • ' N
0 3 Q s
\ ~ RE ~
/ \~~ •~~ '
~ ~ ~
`. `\ ~ , I I
O~~\ ~ •' ~ a b,
\ • 4 .~ /.
K
• R~t
rte'
z~ /
`389-5
NORTH
~ ~-
~. ~ ~
~ ,~ ~
i
~w A~
d O
N
12
t.i° ~c
-. / \ I
~ ~ R.C/S
' R1
v / ~~` ~ ,
1 •/ ¢ ~ '
O \
R1
aoo A~ ~ '~
w .~
~ _,
39
~.n Ac
~~~
.!3
x
/ z2
4~ ~ - -
~- JAG!< n~~5
F3 i'o ~~
COMMUNITY SERVICES - 3 -
AND DEVELOPMENT Ate Q~~ i ~- Zg*~~ R 3 8.19 - 2 - ~ ~ 5
X89 s
STAFF REPORT
PETITIONER: Jack G. Bess
CASE NUMBER: 12-3/89 DATE: March 3, 1989
REVIEWED BY: Jon Hartley
Residential
Petition of Jack Bess to rezone a 2.16 acre tract frostructure, located
to B-1, BusinessRoadoinrthe CavefSpring Magisterial District.
at 5422 Starkey
1, NATURE OF REQUEST residence to
a, Petitioner offices. No cha ges aret anticipated to the structure
professional
or layout of the site at thi nursery Aand lgreenh useheoperations
a non-conforming retail
Petitioner has proffered asfficesdition that the parcel will be
used only for professional o
b, Attached concept plan (survey) and zoning vicinity map describe
project more fully.
2, APPLICABLE REGULATIONS
a, The B-1, Business distri mtinpStrative fficesariety of medical,
financial, business and ad
b, Site plan review will be required to insure compliance with County
regulations.
c, Commercial entrance permit will be required from VDOT.
a.
b.
SITE CHARACTERISTICS
Topography: Property
natural drainage Swale
property.
Ground Cover:
rear portion
slopes downward from Starkey Road to a
and then rises toward the rear of the
Front portion of lot is primarily lawn, while the
is wooded.
4. AREA CHARACTERISTICS
a, Future Growth Priority: Situated within the Cave Spring Commun ty
Planning Area. The growth initiative for this area is to stabilize
growth.
b. General Starkey Road areanasindustrial usesinand openmspacefamily
residential, commercial a
5, LAND USE IMPACT ASSESSMENT
Rating: Rate each factor according to the impact of the proposed action.
Use a scale of 1 through negligible impact, 3 manageable impact, 4 =
1 = positive impact, 2 not applicable.
disruptive impact, 5 = severe impact, and N/A
RATING FACTOR
COMMENTS
LAND USE COMPATIBILITY
4 a, Comprehensive Plan=within5 a o Development Dlandouse tcategorys
placed this area when incorporated
Office uses are of moderate compatibility
in a planned residential SeveOnpthis~basisarthistproposalgis
as free standing land use
inconsistent with the land ~se plan map and policies. On the
~~-~
3
2
3
2
3
opposite side of Starkey Road, the area is within a Transition
land use category, where office uses are encouraged, although,
Policy TR-5 discourages conversion of detached residences to
offices unless part of a unified development. Three hundred
and fifty feet south of this property the land use category
is Core, where offices are encouraShould uthist petition abe
policies related to site design.
approved, a staff initiated land use plan amendment will be
submitted.
b. Surrounding Laes.and open spaceunding land is single family
residential us
c. Neighboring Arces and open hspaceg area is single and multi-
family residen ,
d, Site Layouts See attached concept plan (survey). Existing
house contains approximately 1200 square feet with an
additional 525 square feet in the garage located north of the
the layout would remain
house. According to the petitioner,
unchanged a areass for eemployeesoorrcustomers ndicated location
of parking
e. Architecture with vertical siding n a ranchfdesigner block
construction
f, Screening and Landscaping: As per ordinance, which requires
Type C screening and buffering, particularly along the
northern property line.
2 g, Amenities:
2 ~,, natural Amenities:
~'RAFFIC
2 i, Street Capacities: According to Trip Generation by t e
Institute of Transportation Engineers, this proposal would
generate 42 ADT, based on the number of employee508•InThere
the ADT adjacent to the site on Starkey Road 4,
were 3 reported accidents between Penn Forest Boulevard and
Buck Mountain Road in 1987.
3 j, Circulation: Concept plan (survey) does n buts has verbally
of parking area for customers or employees,
indicated parking will be provided behind the garage where
the greednasuaeconditionr only one entra ce onpStarkeyeRoadas
proffere
UTILITIES
2 k, Water: Adequate supply and distribution.
2 1. Sewer: Adequate treatment and transmission.
DRAINAGE
2 m. Basin: Located within an unnamed tributary basin of Bac
Creek. Minor flooding problems have occurred in the lower
reaches of this tributary in the vicinity of Penn Forest
Elementary School and Merriman Road.
N/A n. Floodplain: Not applicab5e_
`38~ .~
PUBLIC SERVICES
2 0. Fire Protection: Within established service standar .
2 p, Rescue: Within established service standard.
N/A q. Parks and Recreation:
N/A r. Schools:
TAX BASE
2 s, - Land and RevenuemYearValu$500,000(newjexisting
- Taxable Gross
- Total Employees: 9
- Total Revenue to the County/Year: Approximately 52,500(new)
ENVIRONMENT
2 t. Air:
2 u, Water:
2 v. Soils:
2 w, Noise:
3 x, Signage: Signage has not been specified. Currently
ordinance would permit 285 square feet of signage.
6, PLAN CONSISTENCY
This area is designated as Development. The proposed professional Should
is i.nt..onsistent~ witroved, Ca st affe initiatednland use plandar~endment will
~,~ ~ _ ~ ~tition b.. aPP
Le ^~,~:, .:~~~ztted.
~, STAFF EVALUATION
a, Strengths: (1) Proposal would eliminate a non-conforming retai
nursery operation. (2) Petitioner has proffered as conditions
professional offices only and only one entrance on Starkey Road.
b, Weaknesses: (1) Proposed professional office is i No nproffer
with the Comprehensive Plan policies and map. (2)
prohibiting the construe No proffer donlthellocat on orn designiof
space on the site. {3}
proposed parking. (4) No proffer restricting signage.
c, Proffers Suggested: {1) Property shall be used for professional
offices only. (2) Only one access point along Starkey Road shall
be permitted. (3) Type C screening and buffering shall be
provided. (4) Total signage on the property shall not exceed 30
square feet. {5) No freestanding signage shall be allowed on the
property. (6) All par additional bprofessionalhofficeespacetshall
of the house. {7) No
be allowed.
- 6 -
VIRGINIA:
BEFC)RE THE BOARD OE SUPERVISORS OE ROANOKE COUNTY
p, 2.16 acre parcel of land, )
generally located ~ ~~ etarkP~r R~_ ~_w?
R n nlr
within the )
~ Magisterial District, and >
~ recorded as parcel # ~_,_,,~a 2_~,~fis )
o )
`~' in the Roanoke County Tax Records. )
FINAL ORDER
TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY:
W WHEREAS, your Petitioner Jack G. Bess, C. L. S.
F' did petition the Board of County Supervisors to rezone the above-referenced parcel
2 District
~ f rom R-3 District to B-1
o for the purpose of Professional Offices
Ca
W WHEREAS, after due legal notice, the Planning Commission did hold a public
O March 7 19 89, at which time, all parties
w 'nearing of the petition on - --
~ in interest were given an opportunity to be heard; and
March 28,
WHEREAS, after full consideration at the public hearing held on
19 89 the Board of County Supervisors determined t'nat the rezoning be
approved with proffers on 3/28/89•
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDERED that the aforanentioned parcel of land, which is
contained in the Roanoke County Tax Maps as Parcel 87.19-2-4&5 and recorded
in Deed Book 2 Page 138 and legally described below. be rezoned from
R-3 District to B-1 District.
- 7 -
Legal Description of Property (Metes and Bounds):
Description of Lots 3 and 4, Section 2, Map of Southern Pines Subdivision
on Starkey Road in Roanoke County, Virginia:
Beginning at a point in the east line of Starkey Road, said point being
249.20 Feet south of the intersection of the south line of Sleepy Hollow
Drive and the east line of Starkey Road S. W.; thence leaving Starkey
Road and with the division line between Lots 2 and 3, Section 2 of
Southern Pines S 650 55' E 412.00 Feet to an old iron pipe in the9 and
west line of Lot 10; thence with common lines between Lots 3, 4, ,
10, S 240 05' W 220.00 Feet to an old o on~pipe; thence with the
common line between Lots 4 and 5, N 65 55 W 451.90 Feet to an old
iron pin in the east line of Starkey Road; thence with the east line
of Starkey Road N 350 56' E 135.10 Feet to an angle goint; thence
N 310 10' E 10.9 Feet to an angle point; thence N 30 59' E 77.60 Feet
to the point of beginning, and containing 2.16 Acres and being Lots
3 and 4, Section 2, Map of Southern Pines Subdivision recorded in
Plat Book 2, Page 138 of the Roanoke County Clerk's Office.
BE IT FURTHER ORDERID that a copy of this order be transmitted to the Secretary
of the Planning Commission and that he be directed to reflect that change on the
official zoning map of Roanoke County.
ADOPTED on motion of Supervisor
Robers
and upon the
following recorded vote:
AYES• Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Garrett
NAYS: None
ABSEN'T':
Supervisor Nickens
~~~~ ~ ~~~ Deputy
Clerk
cc: File f rvisors
Arnold Covey, Director, De6~~'~yl~~l~~
Terry Harrington, Director, Planning
John Wi]1ey, Director, Real Esta8e_ Assessment
. `38c7-.5
VIRGINIA:
BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY
p, 2.16 acre parcel of land,
generally located 5422 Starkey Rd.
Roanoke, Virginia 24014
PROFFER
within the Cave Spring ) OF
Magisterial District, and ) CONDITIONS
rn
00 recorded as parcel # 87.19-2-4&5 )
o )
M in the Roanoke County Tax Records. )
TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE CO[JN`I'Y
~ Being in accord with Sec. 15.1-491.1 et seq. of the Code of Virginia and Sec.
H 21-105E of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance, the Petitioner Jack G. Bess, C. L. S.
o hereby voluntarily proffers to the
U
o Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia the following conditions to the
H
~ rezoning of the above-referenced parcel of land:
L1 (1) Professional offices only with only one entrance on Starkey Road
W
~ (2) Property shall be used for professional offices only. (3) Type C screening and
w buffering shall be provided. (4) Total signage on the property shall not exceed
~ 100 sq.ft. No freestanding signage shall be allowed on the property. (5) All
parking shall be located behind the front line of the house. (6) Total building
floor area shall not exceed 6,000 sq.ft. and height shall be limited to 2~ stories.
Respectfully submitted,
Petitioner
- 9
S.Wj.
8 ~'- ~,
PETITIONER: SI~PHEN & MICHELLE WIKE
CASE ; 14-3/89
Planning Commission Hearing Date: March 7, 1989
Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: March 28, 1989
p,, ~TJEST
Petition of Stephen and Michelle Wikn off cezin an ex~.sting structurefrlocated
Residential to B-1, Business to operate a
at 5681 Starkey Road in the Cave Spring Magisterial District.
B. CITIZEN PARTICIPA`T'ION rehensive
Paul Smith expressed opposition to a business in a residential area. Mr. Witt
informed Mr. ~nith that the area is designated for office uses in the Carp
Plan.
C. SIGDTIFICANT IMPACT FACTORS ses.
1. Circulation• Existing southern entrance to bes dential parcelssshod be
Northern entrance providing access to adjoining
closed to business traffic.
D, PROFFERID CONDITIONS for the office use with no additions
1. The existing residence will behes~rking on the property.
with the exception of improving ration.
2, No printing will occur on premises in connection with the business ope
3, The existing structure will be utf~izeda no portableror~t~Porary signs shall be
4. Signage shall not exceed 24 ~I-
installed. will be used only
5, The cinder block g he ge to the rear of the existing dwelling
o ration of the business on the property and will not
in connection with t pe
be leased to outside businesses.
6. All onsite parking shall occur to the rear of the front line of the existing
dwelling.
E. ~vIISSIONER' S MOTION, WTE AND RF,ASON tition
Ivlr, Winstead stated that he will abstassibleconflictlof inaerest.on this Pe
;n order to avoid any appearance of a po
Mr. Witt moved to approve the petition
carried with the following rGordon,lWitte-
Ay~; Robinson, Massey,
NAYS: None
ABSTAIN: Winstead
ABSENT: None
with proffered conditions. The motion
F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE
None.
G . ATI'A S
ncept Plan (8~" x 11")
~cinity Map (8~" x 11")
~taff Report
Other
G
Terrance Harrington, retary
Roanoke County Plann ng C~nission
-1.
r '
..- •-
. ~.
/7G•7s
~\ .o
~3 ,gC,QE
V,
0 1
('(1
~1
,~ V
~ Z
a Q
~` ~ ~
~ ~
~h 'Q
~v
~~
Q ~
~~
y2
0
~~
~~rl
"~
b ~~
I
V
«i
v ~~ \
ti ~ v '.
hV~ ~
j.:'~~0
P o ~~
~ .. ~ w -
/1•~ • 70.3 ~ f/DUSE OETi~/L
M ~
`~A~,,,l ~0 st.~Lt~ / X30
` ~ co,G+~E ~ ~~
-.- - Kl
~ ~ - _ ~ O~c ~/°T~~ T~~s ~°T ~s~ oT
~4 asap ~ ~ ~ ~~ A~~ F ~ ZAQ ECf~RE'9'
I ~ ~ h ~ FAD DU /~A
~ Na a o h
IQ~ ~ 0 3~ ~ ~ ~~,LTH Op pl
~ O Q ~O~ ~G
3~ 1 , ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o T, p PARKER
M
O \ 4 ~I V LAND SURVEYOR
~~ ~~I ~ ~ V
~Q ~ CERTIFICATE NO. ~
~ I ~ I c~-,p 420 ~~O
~ -` i /390 ~ P~/! OiPF
~ 4
~-~- S". 2¢ =/G ~/l/ /S¢-~ ~ / lA~~'D LAND Svc
srA~~E>' 'QD~~'
/,9- sEC• ,QT
_ - --- SIJR-V EY--FOR=- -- SM/Ti`s ¢ - - .
- ---- -- - -- - - --- ~,q,C'•~CSO~ DA~t//~ ~
A6L~~~
~~,~/c~.9 sv.E
S,Tv.4~'E o,J .STAQ~~y~°,o~
C vA sEC. ,Ql -
VIRGINIA SGALE; L ~ GO ~
AT7Mis KER & SON PATE: 'C~'?~
~ HEREdY CERTIfYS RRECT• 6Y -~, P. PAR SURVEYORS
t'u-TOt*suR ~'/.Zl~'~ ENGINEERS ~• N.s.L-Z3 p• 20¢76
SALEM VIRGINIA
tsY• - No suwvcYOw
cE~rrtt*tEC u- _ 2 -
• ' i / / 1 S •/ r. ~-J/
,~
~ ~
i ,
u -,
`e ~ 1
;1 Y
u` ~ /
t~ .
' ~ ~ w O / `
41
37 /
q.2T Ac s
/ i
1
a~ ` ~ ~,
-~ R~ , '~
s3 h
R~ 1] , ~ 39 , ~ \
~.co .• ~
St y.~ 3e / ~ ~t w
~ 3 ~.n ~ -aok
1 ~ M
1 R1 , ~1 / ~
~ , _ / ` ~~
w, ~ /
~ , ~ `. ,
49 11 \\a..
tl LoO~c _ / ~ ~
~ ~ , l00 K --
_:un~_ u
~ ~ --
~~` ~~~ M1 • ~ • 43 ~. •a
~Z3 , ~,Z 844 / ~1.6T9 OutL MowNM~ M~~
. ~~ ~~ ` ~
~ BZ ~ .+
,7 ~ ~ 1 ,•• ~„ J
''" NQ's
i
- 3 - #Z-1 ~o g -1
COMMUNITY SERVICES 87 ~~ _ ~ _ ~{o
AND DEVELOPMENT v -~~ ~ ~~°'~'~, ~°-~v
38~ ~
STAFF REPORT
NUMBER: 14-3/89 PETITIONER: STEPHEN & MICHELLE WIRE
CASE
DATE: MARCH 7, 1989
REVIEWED BY: TIM BEARD
ition of Stephen and Michelle Wioeeratezane office inran ex sting
Pet
R-1, Residential to a-1, Business ° Road (VA 904) in the Cave Spring
structure, located at 5681 Starkey
Magisterial District.
1. NATURE OF REQUEST s i n l e f am i ly
a, Conditional req itori 1 officezfor the purpose of publishing
residence as an ed
religious materials.
b, Attached concept plan and vicinity map describe project more
fully.
2. AppL ICABLE REGULATI O r m i t s a v a r i e t y o f o f f i c e u s e s i n c l u d i n g
a. B_1 zoning p rofessional offices.
administrative, executive, editorial aroffers: (1) Development
Petitioner has made the following P with the site plan. (2)
shall occur in substantial conformity as an office. (3) No
The existing residence will be used only
printing will occur on premises in connection with the business.
(4) The existing building will not be enlarged.
b. VDOT commercial entrance permit required.
c, Site plan review required to ensure compliance with County
regulations.
3, SITE CHARArCa ERISTI~lat; site slopes very gently south toward a dry
a, Topog P Y'
branch.
b, Ground Cover: Grass, scattered deciduous trees, existing
dwelling and detached garage.
4, AREA CHARACTERISTICS gituated within the Cave Spring
a. Future Growth Priority: rowth area;
Community Planning Area. Designated as a stable g
currently receiving urban services.
General area is developed witimitedlgeneral retadilmuses family
b.
residential, institutional and
5. LAND USE IMPACT ASSESSMENT to the impact of the proposed
Rating: Rate each factor according
action. Use a scale of 1 thioug bl impact, 3 = manageable impact,
1 = positive impact, 2 = neg g = not applicable.
4 = disruptive impact, 5 = severe impact, and N/A
- 4 -
~U7-'~
RATING FACTOR
3
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
COMMENTS
LAND USE COMPATIBILITY
a. Comprehensive Plan: 1985 Comprehensive DevelopmeoffPcenuses
placed this area witronosed arelencouragedtwgthin the land use
such as the one p p
designation. Proposal conforms with policy C-1 (encourage mixed
use development in core areas), policy C-4 (coordinate commer-
cial site design with regard to minimum number of vehicular
access points to public streets and banddpolicyZC-5ndprovide
should complement adjacent buildings),
screening and buffering in order to reduce nuisances with less
intensive, single family residential development) through
ordinance enforcement. Proposal does not conform to policy C-2
(serve each core area by an arterial or higher grade street).
Land: Single family residential; heavily traveled
b. Surrounding
secondary highway.
c. Neighboring Area: Single family reneral r t ilinstitutional;
heavily traveled secondary highway; q
Property features two gravel entrances (one of
d, Site Layout: arcels north of petitioner's
which provides access to adjoining p
site). Petitionenearsthedsouthdsidetofsexisting structure spaces
will be provided
e, Architecture: One story brick structure to be utilized as
office. Detachedces odrersboloag g nr the future f brick structure
may be used as a Y
and Landscape: Per ordinance (type C, option 1 or
f. Screening
option 2 required).
g, Amenities:•Petitionerlansindicates no specific parking layoutark-
ing spaces, concept p
h. Natural Featuresin relulationsl(seeodrainageocomments)be subject
to local floodpla g
4
2
2
2
TRAFFIC
i. Street Capacities: 1986 ADT on this segment of Starkey Roa was
3,764. Five accidS~reetc(VAr717)ntoh$uck MountaineRoadf(VA 679)y
Road from Arthur
Use will generate fewer than 25 vehicle trip ends per day.
j. Circulation: Existing southern ovidingtaccesseto oadjoining
purposes. Northern entrance p
residential parcels should be closed to. business traffic.
UTILITIES
k, Water: Adequate source and distribution.
1. Sewer: Adequate treatment and transmission.
DRAINAGE
m. Basin: Back Creek subbasin.
- 5 -
`339 -- Cn
• n: Proposed site is not located wEnhineering D Party
n, Floodplal Hated by FEMA. However, County 9 lain of
area so desig a ct property may lie in the floodp
ment reports that subj
e area exceeding 100 acres. If the specific 100 year
a drainag
flood elevation cannot beneers orlthe Ussnq standard data re
Geological Surveya
the U.S. Army Corps of Engl e a certlfi
licant for the proposed use shall engag
the app
ineer to determine this a rinattechniques [see oral ance S
eng inee g roximated
hydrologic and hydraulic eng
21-61D(c) ] . If the site is found tl icantlwill the required to
100 year floodplain, the app
floodproof structures and/or acquire flood insurance.
3
2 0.
2 P•
N/A Q•
N/A r.
2 s.
2
2
2
2
9
6.
7.
PUBLIC SERVICES Within established service standard.
Fire Protection:
Rescue: Within established service standard.
Parks and Recreation:
School:
TAX BASE $56,500
- Land and Improvement Value:
- Taxable Gross Sales/Year: Estimated $1.3 million
Total Employees: 4 year: Approximately $5,800
- Total revenue to the County/
New revenue: $700
t.
u.
v.
w.
x.
t
proposal does not
arterial or higher
he land use p
ENVIRONMENT
Air:
Water:
Soils:
Noise:
Signage: Not specified.
conform
PLAN CONSISTENCY Hated as Core . Office
This area is desig and with policies
lan map
See requested proffer (1).
to
grade street
policy C-2
serving the
uses are consistent with
C-1, C-4, and C-5. The
due to the absence of an
site.
STAFF EVALUATION ~l) Consistent with policies C-1, C-4, and C-5. (2)
a. Strengths: residence will be
Petitioner has proffered that the existing
used only as an office and wiin nOwill eoccur don` premises nit
has proffered that no print g
connection with the business. t la~
p
any
ested: (1) Sign square footages should not excee
c. Proffers Sugg ortable or temporary signs shall be installed
24 sq.ft• and no p and buffering shall be implemented pe
(2) Type C screening
ordinance. ( 3) No use of the norroheosedsbusinesstr (4 ) The cinde
made in connection with the p p not f
block garage to the rear of the exconnectedetol themeditoria]
used for any purpose not directly arking shall occur east c
publishing business. (5) All onsite p
the front line of the existing dwelling.
- 6 -
b, Weaknesses:
provides no
landscaping.
(1) Inconsistent with policy C-2. (2) Concep
information regarding signage, parking
~~ ! -
rn
0
M
H
z
w
H
z
0
U
0
H
Q
w
0
x
a
a
^STERHOIJDT, FERGl1SD
NATT, ANERON & AGEI
ATTORNEYS-AT-LAW
RDANDKE, VIRGINIA
24018-tfi99
VIRGINIA:
BEFORE THE_BOARD OF_COUNTY_SUPERVISORS OF_ROANOKE_COUNTY
IN RE: )
FINAL ORDER
A 1.13 acre parcel of land, generally )
located on the westerly side of Starkey)
Road, near its intersection with )
Buck Mountain Road within the Cave j
Spring Magisterial
District and recorded as Parcel )
#g7,18-1-40, in the Roanoke County j
Tax Records.
TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY:
WHEREAS, your Petitioners, STEPHEN and MICHELLE
WIKE, did petition the Board of County Supervisors to rezone
the above-referenced parcel of land from R-1 District to B-1
District, for the purpose of office use.
WHEREAS, after due legal notice, the Planning
Commission did hold a public hearing of the petition on
March 7, 1989, at which time, all parties in interest were
given an opportunity to be heard; and
WHEREAS, after full consideration, the Board of
County Supervisors determined that the rezoning be approved
with the proffered conditions.. on 3/28/89.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDERED that the
aforementioned parcel of land, which is contained in the
a Roanoke County Tax Maps as 87.18-1-40 and legally described
below, be rezoned from R-1 District to B-1 District.
ii -~
,,..3 ~`-
^STERHOUOT, FERGUSO
NATT, AHERON & AGE
ATTORNEY5-AT-LAW
ROANOKE, VIRGINIA
24018-1699
BEGINNING at a point on the westerly side
of Starkey Road, Virginia Secondary Rt.
904 at the Southeasterly corner of the
property now or formerly known as the
Baptist Parsonage; thence with the
westerly side of Starkey Road South 240
16' West 154 feet to a point in the center
of a dry branch; thence leaving Starkey
Road North 73° 30' West 310.6 feet to a
point; thence North 21° 37' East 191.75
feet to a point; thenocen~°and place'ofast
316.6 feet to the p
beginning.
with the following conditions:
1, That the existing residence on the property
would be used for the office use with no additions with the
exception of improving the parking on the property.
2, That there will be no printing in connection
with the business operation.
3, That existing structure will be utilized
without enlargement.
4. The square footage of signs shall not exceed
24 square feet. No portable or temporary signs shall be
installed.
5, The cinder block garage to the rear of the
existing dwelling will be used only in connection with the
operation of the business on the property and will not be
leased to outside businesses.
6, All on-site parking shall occur to the rear of
N
the front line of the existing dwelling.
8
38~-~
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this order
be transmitted to the Secretary of the Planning Commission
and that he be directed to reflect that change on the
Official Zoning Map of Roanoke County. Robers
ADOPTED on motion of Supervisor _________-~
McGraw _-___~ and upon the
seconded by Supervisor ____________
following recorded vote:
Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Garrett
AYES:
NAYES: None
ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens
Deputy Clerk, Roanoke County
Board of Supervisors
R4.n9.e
cc: File
Arnold Covey, Director, Development & Inspections
Terry Harrington, Director, Planning
John Wi]Jey, Director, Real Estate Assessment
^5TERH0UDT, FERGUSON
NATT, AHERON & AGEE
ATTORNEYS-AT-LAW
ROANOKE, VIRGINIA _ ~ _
24018-1699
ACTION #
ITEM NUMBER `3
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: March 28, 1989
AGENDA ITEM: Amendments to Articles II and III of the Roanoke
County Subdivision Ordinance and adoption of the "Policy for
Subdivision Approval with On-Site Sewage Disposal Systems And/Or
Wells" as part of the Construction Standards and Specifications
Manual.
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
BACKGROUND:
Roanoke County has been faced in recent years with rapid
development of subdivisions in the rural parts of the County
where public facilities are unavailable.
This type of development has created an increasing number of
complaints from the citizens, realtors and developers from the
fear of contamination to existing wells, failing septic systems
or the denial of lots for on-lot septic systems after the lots
have been sold.
Because of the public concerns the County staff and the
Roanoke County/Vinton Health Department have developed policies
for subdivision approval for On-Site Sewage Disposal Systems
And/Or Wells which will help insure the proper development of
future rural subdivisions.
The proposed subdivision amendments and policy have been
reviewed by the Roanoke County/Vinton Health Department, County
Staff and the Roanoke Valley Homebuilders. Therefore, the County
Staff recommends the following amendments to the Subdivision
Ordinance and, the adoption of the attached policy.
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
At the regular meeting of the Planning Commission of Roanoke
`3~~
County held on the 7th of March, 1989, the Planning Commission,
after careful consideration of the proposed amendments to the
Subdivision Ordinance and after consideration of the "Policy for
Subdivision Approval with On-Site Sewage Disposal Systems and/or
Wells, moved that the following revisions suggested by the
Roanoke Valley Homebuilder's Association be incorporated into
this policy.
1. Section 301.01 - Subtitle (A) - Topographic Map:
All preliminary Plats shall be drafted with five foot
contour intervals. This shall not be derived from
U.S.C. & G.S. quadrangle maps or other sources where
distortion may occur from a change in scale.
AMEND THIS SECTION TO READ:
All preliminary Plats shall be drafted with five foot
contour intervals. Move and incorporate the remaining
portions into Section 305.00 - Final Plan - under
Subtitle (A).
2. Section 301.01 - Subtitle (C).
Each proposed lot shall have a drainfield site which
shall conform to the following:
1. contain sufficient area for one drainfield and it
must be contained on the same lot or parcel on which it
serves. A 50$ reserve area shall be designated, if
required, by the Health Department and,
2. shall have been field located and only the reserve
areas shall be shown on the Plat.
AMEND THIS SECTION TO READ:
Preliminary location of Soil Studies shall be shown as
provided by a consulting engineer or soil scientist.
The remaining requirements of this section are
incorporated in Section 305.00 - FINAL PLAN - under
Subtitle (B).
The Roanoke Valley Homebuilder's only suggestion not
incorporated into this policy was the request to permit the
location of drainfields on adjacent lots.
The County staff and the Planning Commission strongly feel
that all newly created lots should contain their own sewage
disposal systems.
Being no further changes, the Roanoke County Planning
Commission recommended the approval of the following amendment to
2
~~~> -~
the Subdivision Ordinance and the adoption of the "Policy for
Subdivision Approval with On-Site Sewage Disposal Systems and/or
Wells."
SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE
a• Section 17-6 (F) - The subdivider shall present to the
Roanoke County/Vinton Health Department a preliminary
Plat of the subdivision as required under the
Construction Standards Manual entitled "Policy for
Subdivision Approval with On-Site Sewage Disposal
Systems And/Or Wells".
b• Section 17-10.(K) - A statement of certification by the
Roanoke County/Vinton Health Department to the effect
that all lots shown on the subdivision Plat have been
reviewed by the personnel of the Roanoke Count
Health Department and have met the criteria asysetnton
forth in the Commonwealth of Virginia Sewage Handling
and Disposal Regulations entitled "32.1 Code of
Virginia, as amended to date, and each lot or parcel is
eligible for a septic permit."
The first reading of the Ordinance is scheduled for March
28, 1989 and the second reading is scheduled for April 11, 1989.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
The staff recommends that the proposed amendments to the
Subdivision Ordinance and the "Policy for Subdivision Approval
with On-Site Sewage Disposal Systems and/or Wells, as amended by
the Roanoke County Planning Commission be approved.
S~MITTED BY:
Arnold Covey
Develpment Review and
Inspections Director
APPROVED:
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
--------
--------------------
Approved( ) Motion by: ACTION VOTE
Denied ( ) No Yes Abs
Received( ) Garrett
Referred Johnson
to McGraw
-- Nickens
Robers
300.00
301.00
301.01
.~: ~ l
SCR ®ISCI~SSION ®S ~Y ,3 ~~,~
SUBJECT F®R RE
3 8 ~g~~
RR~~~~ ''OO
POLICY FOR SUBDIVISION APPROVALSW~TH~ON~~ITEDSEWAGE
DISPOSAL SYSTEMS AND/OR WELLS.
Developer must submit to the Roanoke County/Vinton
Health Department a preliminary Plat showing all items
as outlined below:
PRELIMINARY SUBMISSIONS:
PRELIMINARY PLAT:
A. Topographic Map - all preliminary Plats submitted
shall be drafted with five foot contour intervals.
B. An overall scale of 1 inch equals 100 feet, or 1
inch equals 50 feet shall be required in
preparation of the preliminary plat.
C. Preliminary location of Soil Studies shall be
shown as provided by consulting engineer or soil
scientist.
D. All proposed and existing structures, well
tclass), septic systems and underground utilities
within the subdivision shall be shown.
All existing wells and septic tank systems outside
of the subdivision located within 100 feet of
any boundary of the proposed subdivision shall be
shown.
NOTE: For existing developed springs, the
distance shall be increased to 200 feet of any
boundary.
E. All existing and proposed easements and
right-of-ways shall be shown.
301.02 DRAINFIELD SITE PREPARATION:
A. All lot corners staked and flagged. Lots with
depths greater than 100 feet, the lot lines shall
be clearly flagged every 100 feet.
B. Corners of the proposed drainfield site shall be
clearly staked and identified by lot numbers.
(Stakes identifying the upper and lower limits of
the drainfield site shall be set on corresponding
contours)
4
C. Each lot will be evaluated for a minimum three
bedroom dwelling.
Dwellings with four bedrooms, or more, the
developers must submit in writing to the Roanoke
County/Vinton Health Department identifying those
lots prior to the site evaluation.
301.03 SOILS EVALUATION PROCEDURE:
The following information shall be provided by a Consulting
Engineer and/or Soil Scientist, recorded on the State's "Soil
Evaluation Report" (form #CHS-201A and 2018, latest edition).
Each individual site evaluation sheet shall include, but not
limited to, the following:
A. Subdivision name, Lot, Block and Section.
B. Position in the landscape.
C. Degree of slope.
D. A soil description derived from three test borings
in the drainfield area and one (1) test boring in
the reserve area. Two (2) borings will be
required in the reserve area if it's not close
proximity to the drainfield site.
Soil Descriptions to include:
1. Color
2. Texture
3. Soil type
4. Presence of drainage mottles
5. Depth to hard rock, if applicable
6. Recommended installation depths
7. Estimated percolation rate
8. Whether percolation tests are required
E. Soil study locations are to be triangulated to
fixed referenced points.
F. Use of a backhoe to evaluate individual drainfield
sites shall be restricted to lots where use of
a backhoe is deemed necessary, authorization must
be obtained from a Roanoke County/Vinton Health
Department Sanitarian.
NOTE: Front end loaders will not be ermitted
to evaluate individual drainfield sites.
302.00 FIELD APPOINTMENT:
302.01 Appointments with the Health Department can be
5
~~"- '~
302.02
302.03
303.00
scheduled after rough grading of streets, submission of
approved preliminary plan and required soils evaluation
data.
Work will be scheduled on a "first come, first serve"
basis.
Scheduled field appointments are subject to
cancellation or rescheduling as influenced by inclement
weather conditions as follows:
1. Rain, snow or sleet
2. Extreme cold and/or freezing conditions
PERCOLATION TESTS:
Percolation tests shall be conducted only after evaluation
of the site by the Health Department when soil conditions
indicate a marginal rate of absorption. All percolation tests
shall be conducted under supervision of the Health Department in
accordance with procedures outlined in the Virginia Department of
Health Regulations, Title 32.1, Code of Va., latest edition. All
percolation test data shall be submitted to the Health Department
regardless of test results.
304.00 WORK SESSIONS:
After all field evaluations have been completed and
pertinent data has been submitted to the Health Department a work
session may be scheduled with the project consultants.
305.00 FINAL PLAN - (for well and drainfield)
Submit three copies of the well and drainfield map and five
copies of the record Plat. The well and drainfield map shall
show the following:
A. Topography - this shall not be derived from USC & GS
quadrangle maps or other sources where distortion may
occur from a change in scale.
B. Field approved drainfield sites and a 50$ reserve area
shall be designated, if required, by the Health
Department.
C. Location of all percolation test holes regardless of
rates.
D. Preliminary and final drainfield site numbers.
E. Proposed house location.
6
~~' ~?'
F. Proposed well location and Class No..
G. Drainfield pump systems.
H. Locate percolation test holes and approved drainfields
and reserve areas shall be tied down with distances
from lot lines. roved
I. Each lot shown on the final Plat shall have an app
drainfield site on the same lot or parcel on which it
serves.
305.01 FINAL APPROVAL
When the on-site sewage disposal and/or well map has been
approved, three copies will be stamped and signed approved by the
Roanoke County/Vinton Health Department. One copy will be kept
on file at the Health Department, one at the Roanoke County
Administration Building (Division of Engineering) and one will be
given to the Developer.
The final Plat, prior to recordation, must designate reserve
areas (if necessary) as private easements.
Final approval of the subdivision will be given only after
signed approved by the Roanoke County/Vinton Health Department
Director/or designee with the following statement on the Plat: "I
hereby certify that all lots in this subdivision, (as shown on
the stamped approved drainfield and/or well map and shall be kept
on file at the Roanoke County/Vinton Health Department and the
Roanoke County Division of Engineering) have met the criteria in
the Commonwealth of Virginia Sewage Handling and Disposal
Regulations, Title 32.1, Code of Virginia, as amended, latest
edition and each lot or parcel is eligble for a septic tank
permit.
7
. ~ .3~9-~
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 28, 1989
ORDINANCE AMENDING AND REENACTING CHAPTER
17, SUBDIVISIONS, OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY
CODE TO PROVIDE FOR THE ADOPTION OF ON-
SITE SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEMS AND/OR WELLS
STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND TO AUTHO-
RIZE THE ADOPTION BY RESOLUTION OF A NEW
SECTION OF THE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION
STANDARDS MANUAL ENTITLED "POLICY FOR
SUBDIVISION APPROVAL WITH ON-SITE SEWAGE
DISPOSAL SYSTEMS AND/OR WELLS"
WHEREAS, the adoption of this ordinance is authorized
by Chapter 11 of Title 15.1 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as
amended; and
WHEREAS, notice of the County's intention to adopt
amendments to its Subdivision Ordinance was duly advertised in
the Roanoke Times and World News on February 21, 1989, and Feb-
ruary 28, 1989; and
WHEREAS, at its regular meeting on March 7, 1989, the
Roanoke County Planning Commission recommended approval of the
following amendments to the Subdivision Ordinance and the adop-
tion of a new section of the Design and Construction Standards
Manual entitled "Policy for subdivision approval with on-site
wewage disposal systems and/or wells"; and
WHEREAS, the first reading and public hearing of this
ordinance was held on March 28, 1989; and the second reading of
this ordinance was held on April 11, 1989.
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That Chapter 17, Subdivision of the Roanoke County
Code be, and it hereby is, amended and reenacted by the adoption
of Sections 17-6(F) and 17-10(K) to read and provide as follows:
Article II. Preliminary Plats
Section 17-6. Contents; approval.
(F) The subdivider shall resent to the Roanoke
County/Vinton Health Department a preliminary plat of the subdivi-
sion as re uired under the Desi n and Construction Standards Man-
ual entitled "Policy for Subdivision Approval with On-Site Sewage
Disposal Systems and/or Wells."
Article III. Final Plats
Section 17-10. Contents; monuments.
In addition to the requirements for the preliminary
plat, the final plat shall show:
(K) A statement of certification by the Roanoke
Count /Vinton Health De artment to the effect that all lots shown
on the subdivision lat have been reviewed by the personnel of
the Roanoke Count /Vinton Health De artment and have met the cri-
teria as set forth in the Commonwealth of Virginia Sewage Hand-
ling and Dis osal Regulations entitled "32.1 Code of Virginia, as
amended to date, and each lot or parcel is eligible for a septic
permit."
2. That these amendments, additions, and reenactments
shall be in full force and effect from and after April 11, 1989.
~ ~~7
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 28, 1989
RESOLUTION ADOPTING A NEW SECTION OF THE
DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS MANUAL
ENTITLED POLICY FOR SUBDIVISION APPROVAL
WITH ON-SITE SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEMS AND/
OR WELLS"
WHEREAS, the Department of Development is in the pro-
cess of preparing a manual to assist the public, and especially
the development community, for clarification of rules, regula-
tions, and policies applicable to land development in Roanoke
County; and
WHEREAS, a Design and Construction Standards Committee
composed of area engineers, surveyors, members of the Roanoke
Valley Homebuilders Association, and County staff was assembled
to develop the content of the manual and the design standards;
and
WHEREAS, it was the consensus of the committee to
address the areas of water, sewer, street and parking, and drain-
age in the manual; and
WHEREAS, at its meeting on February 14, 1989, the Board
of Supervisors of Roanoke County, by resolution, adopted a manual
of regulations and policies entitled "Design and Construction
Standards Manual" to assist the public in the clarification and
interpretation of rules, regulations, and policies applicable to
land development in Roanoke County, and in particular, the areas
of water, sewer, street and parking, and drainage which shall
have the force of law effective February 15, 1989; and
~~_
WHEREAS, the water design standards and the Street and
Parking Design Standards and Specifications of the manual have
been previously completed and adopted.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved that the Board of Super-
visors of Roanoke County, Virginia, does hereby adopt the third
component of the Design and Construction Standards Manual en-
titled "Policy for subdivision approval with on-site sewage dis-
posal and/or wells."
FURTHER, this section of the manual shall be in full
force and effect from and after April 11, 1989.
t~1i~iy~i~tt~iti1~'i'~~t`Ii'r~~~~i~11'i~~~f~`i11'il~il~~Iiif~~liliil'1ii~1~1i1~tYl~ilt(r~ii7t~li~ii1~11~(I~ii~fi~iii~ilf`t1f11~'1'illliflilt~(f~lllf~lil~lllhilj~
w ~ ~ ~
RE VEST
APPEARANCE Q
_ _
_ _
_ _
_ -
_ _
_ _ -
_ -
_ AGENDA ITEM NO. O -
_ =
S~QDr~~sio~c! p2D~~~~c~-
= SUBJECT '
= I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to
recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter
• so that I may comment.WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM,
_
= I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FORTH
_ RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES
__ LISTED BELOW. .
• Each s Baker will be given between three to five minutes to comment
= p
whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will
_ decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue,
_ and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to
do otherwise.
• S Bakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Ques-
_ p
tions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman.
• All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized
speaker and audience members is not allowed.
• Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times.
• Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments
with the clerk.
c
• INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED
GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION
FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT
=_ THEM.
_ PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO DEPUTY CLERK
NAME ~ t, i=/~g D h o u.~ g G ~
ADDRESS ~ ~ ~ ~l21~~/~ C ~ nJ 5 t
PHONE 3$ ~ ' ~ ~ a
m~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
j,~7riIr1111i~fYl'flYiirllrlfriii`i1i1~rI1111'11111tir'ir1'1iti~lilil'ilYlittiillfil~'it'i'tii'111ri1`I'iii11i111ii111Iii111111i111~y1111i1111111i,u
' .. ~~~ ~.
CE RE UEST
APPEARAN Q
_
_
- ~~`~-
_ AGENDA ITEM NO.
_ -
_ ~,s ~~.
SUBJECT
I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to =
__
= recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter
• so that I may comment.WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM,
_ I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE
= RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES
_ .
__ LISTED BELOW. .
• Each s Baker will be given between three to five minutes to comment
p
.- whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will
= decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue,
= and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to
do otherwise.
• S Bakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Ques- ',,
= p
__ Lions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman.
• All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized
_' speaker and audience members is not allowed.
• Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times.
• Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments
=_ with the clerk.
• INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED
GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION
FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT
THEM.
_ PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO DEPUTY CLERK
~ -~
NAME ~ t .~'~ ~ ~„ 5
-_
"' ADDRESS a ~~
PHONE [5 ~ '" O OCR
mllllllllllllillllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllillllllllilllllllllllllllllilllllllilllllillillllllililllilllllllllllllllll
C,~-1
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGICENTEREON TUESDAYROMARCH 2gi,N1989DMINISTRATION
ORDINANCE 32889-7 AMENDING CHAPTER 7.
"BUILDING REGULATIONS" OF THE ROANOKE
COUNTY CODE BY AMENDING ARTICLE II.
"BUILDING CODE,"SECTION 7-16, "ADOPTED"
WHEREAS, the Town Council of the Town of Vinton has
requested that Roanoke County assume the responsibility of
enforcing the Virginia Statewide Building Code within the
corporate limits of said Town; and
WHEREAS, Roanoke County shall collect all fees and make
all appropriate inspections as required to implement code
enforcement within the Town of Vinton; and
WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held
on March 14, 1989; the second reading was held on March 28, 1989.
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That Chapter 7. "Building Regulations," Article II.
"Building Code," Section 7-16 of the Roanoke County Code is here-
by amended and reenacted as follows:
Article II. Building Code
Sec. 7-16. Adopted.
There is hereby adopted by the board of supervisors,
insofar as not inconsistent with the laws of the state, this Code
and the ordinances of the county, for the purpose of establishing
rules and regulations for the construction, alteration, removal,
demolition, equipment, use, occupancy, location and maintenance
of buildings and structures, including permits and penalties,
that certain code known as the Virginia Uniform Statewide Build-
c~-r
ing Code, as the same may, from time to time, be amended. Such
code is hereby adopted and incorporated as fully as if set out at
length herein and the provisions thereof shall be controlling in
the construction of all buildings and other structures within the
county and within the Town of Vinton.
2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect on
July 1, 1989.
On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor
Robers and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Garrett
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens
A COPY TESTE:
Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Arnold Covey, Director, Development & Inspections
John Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator
James T. Nininger, Jr., Development & Inspections
Paul Mahoney, County Attorney
Skip Burkart, Commonwealth Attorney
Magistrate
Sheriff's Department
Roanoke Law Library, 315 Church Avenue, S.W., Rke 24016
Main Library
Roanoke County Code Book
Roanoke County J&D Court, Intake Counsellor
2
ACTION #
ITEM NUMBER ~'
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: March 28, 1989
AGENDA ITEM: Ordinance amending Chapter 7. "Building Regula-
~~
tions of the Roanoke County Code by amending
Article II. "Building Code," Section 7-16.
"Adopted"
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
BACKGROUND:
Item El of today's agenda is a request from the Town of Vin-
ton for the County to enforce the Virginia Statewide Building
Code within the corporate limits of the Town of Vinton. That
Board report addresses the fiscal impact and alternatives of this
request. That Board report recommends that the County enter into
appropriate agreements with the Town of Vinton to implement build-
ing code enforcement within the Town of Vinton effective July 1,
1989.
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
If the Board accepts the staff recommendation for Item El to
authorize the enforcement of the Virginia Statewide Building Code
in the Town of Vinton by Roanoke County, it will be necessary to
amend Chapter 7 of the Roanoke County Code. This amendment must
be accomplished by the adoption of an ordinance. This proposed
ordinance would amend Section 7-16 by the addition of language
including the Town of Vinton within the enforcement power.
It is proposed that the first reading of this be held on
March 14, 1989, assuming that the Board takes favorable action on
Agenda Item El. The second reading is scheduled for March 28,
1989; the effective date is July 1, 1989.
FISCAL IMPACTS:
See Agenda Item El.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Q-~
It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors favorably
consider the adoption of the proposed ordinance, assuming that
the Board has favorably acted upon Agenda Item El.
Respectfully submitted,
\-~q~v..` i t 1. ~
Paul M. Mahoney
County Attorney
--------------------------------------------------------------
ACTION VOTE
Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs
Denied ( ) Garrett
Received ( ) Johnson
Referred McGraw
To Nickens
Robers
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 28, 1989
ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 7. "BUILDING ~ _/
REGULATIONS" OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE
BY AMENDING ARTICLE II. "BUILDING CODE,"
SECTION 7-16, "ADOPTED"
WHEREAS, the Town Council of the Town of Vinton has
requested that Roanoke County assume the responsibility of
enforcing the Virginia Statewide Building Code within the
corporate limits of said Town; and
WHEREAS, Roanoke County shall collect all fees and make
all appropriate inspections as required to implement code
enforcement within the Town of Vinton; and
WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held
on March 14, 1989; the second reading was held on March 28, 1989.
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That Chapter 7. "Building Regulations," Article II.
"Building Code," Section 7-16 of the Roanoke County Code is here-
by amended and reenacted as follows:
Article II. Building Code
Sec. 7-16. Adopted.
There is hereby adopted by the board of supervisors,
insofar as not inconsistent with the laws of the state, this Code
and the ordinances of the county, for the purpose of establishing
rules and regulations for the construction, alteration, removal,
demolition, equipment, use, occupancy, location and maintenance
of buildings and structures, including permits and penalties,
that certain code known as the Virginia Uniform Statewide Build-
~-/
ing Code, as the same may, from time to time, be amended. Such
code is hereby adopted and incorporated as fully as if set out at
length herein and the provisions thereof shall be controlling in
the construction of all buildings and other structures within the
county and within the Town of Vinton.
2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect on
July 1, 1989.
~~ i ~:
:,, u• .~
LAW OFFICES
OSTERHOUDT, FERGUSON, NATT, AHERON
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
1919 ELECi'RIC ROAD. S. W.
p. O. BOX 20068
CHARLES H. OSTERHOUDT Rpp,NpKE, VIRGINIA
MICHAEL 5. FERGUSON 24018- 16~J9
EDWARD A. NATT
MICHAEL J. AHERON
G~STEVEN AGEE
MARK D. KIDD April 4, 1989
Clerk, Board of Supervisors
of Roanoke County
3738 Brambleton Avenue, SW
Roanoke, Virginia 24018
Re: Stephen and Michelle Wike
~ AGEE
TELEPHONE
703-774-1197
FAX NO.
703-774-09 61
Dear Clerk:
Enclosed please find the Cer t ficate of Publication on t e
he mail. I am forwarding this
above rezoning which I received in
to you for your records.
Very truly yours,
OSTERHOUDT, FERGU50N, NATT,
p,HERON & AGEE, P.C.
Edward A. Natt
EAN/dle
Enclosure
Roanoke County Board of
SUperVISOrS
($566)
.....~..
~~ V '
E m~ a
n ~~, ~L~EG ~ ~~` ~~, 2 ~~
C P
Z
~N PEPSI{D
~ II o ~ 5 cocxE ~` r I
N ~ cfM. goruNGCO. w
/.TAT ~ ~ ~ ~~~
p[ATJT NC.NAPDJONNSONS ~ '°L~~
3! ~~1 ~MOIOR :ODGE 4 Tj ~
ELBLE ~ ~ ~ i Ff S1A'RANT ~.~ z
ENVEL~~'c' ~ ~ ~. J
coH~., u ;, s i ~`
w' Wyn~ aV" p
A ~~~ ~erw"° cNAPMAN 2p yE HOWNS T'-.
N Sr.r y,MANO ~~~1_ ~ 7A91yW,',' ~ DR STATION U
1 " ~ Cam! S
OAKEY'S ~ ~~ t ~,ERD(gM
„~,P,N„ ~, ~ ~, i NORT
\~ ~ENrE - --VICINITY ~ AP
EXISTING 8" WATER LINE
p.J ~
1
rrNrpi
27.00
0'
4
s l~i+.lol
6 90kICI
ice' ~.
~ ~ . \
/ ~
/ ~
~ ~/
~ ~~/
/ W
/ /
/ •~ /
~ l~Y
~e ~
~ I
/~
PROPOSED 8"
WATER LINE
- - ~/~
26
Hlt / i
16 /
27 '~ ~~
T~o~
28
~~~ 1
29 /
u f.
*,t
49 ~ 4 ~~
t~~o ~ 30
'I j1»
~• 1t
ag _I d
I '~'' 1- ,. ~~
40
~~
19 ~/I .~~ 'T/'T--- --
~ ' ~-'nu ' zl \
I ~ ~
N •r
AUTHORIZATION TO ERTEND WATER LINES ON
COMMUNITY SERVICES WILLIAMSON ROAD
2~,~~
ROANOKE
LAND & AUCTION COMPANY, INC.
5249 CLEARBROOK LANE, ROANOKE, VA. 24014 • 703-774-LAND
RT. 4, BOX 12B, FLOYD, VA. 24091 • 703-745-3925
February 28, 1989
HAND DELIVERED
Mr. Lee Garrett, Chairman
Rcanake Co. Board of Supervisors
3738 Brambleton Avenue, SW
Roanoke, VA 214018
Dear Mr. Garrett:
Due to the recent fire that did extensive damage to Bob Bradley's office,
located at 306 McClanahan St., SW in Roanoke, Mr. Bradley and I would like
to request a continuance of our rezoning petition. Same of the necessary
papers will need to be redrawn and, as you can image, everything is pre-
sently in a state of turmoil.
The petiticn was far the rezoning of 2.92 acres located on Chaparral Drive.
The request far the rezoning was made by J. L. Waltz and R. N. Bradley.
We would greatly appreciate ycur understanding and your granting an
extension due to these circumstances.
Respectfully submitted,
~-~+ o~GcJo~
~~ ~
James L. Waltz
JLW/mlh
copy: R. N. Bradley
Land Brokers Farm Dispersals Commercial Properties Timber Sales Residential
REALTOR'
_~ ,.~
O~
G
~t~. ~~
a ~~~ ~
18 ~~ 88
SFSQUICEN7ENN~P~
A Rrmrti~ulBtRinninR
M E M O R A N D U M
T0: ~in~e Marie Fedde~ n ~
FROM: Harry C. Nickens /
DATE: March 17, 1989
SUBJECT: NEWS RELEASE - SCHOOL LUNCH WORKER RECOGNITION
I have on two occasions in two different local newspapers,
Roanoke Times and the Vinton Messenger, seen reference made to
the Glenvar Community Meeting beinoft~hellocalegovernmentsal with
this question of the restructuring
Would you please send out a news. release to all the T•V' ais
print media indicating that our six1989nd ati Mo to pleasant
scheduled for 7 p.m. on March ~.
Elementary School.
Also, a second thought, April 3rd has been declared School Food
Service Employee Recognition Day throughout the nation. It would
Board
seem to me to be appropriate if at our next Roanoke County
of Supervisors Meeting, we develop a resolution thanking the
contribution that these workers make to the quality of our
ro rams within the county and a copy of this be
educational p g
forwarded to the schools tkee athe agendaritemou der consent
particular day. If we could, p ublicity and therefore,
agenda so that we might not giveasomecconsideration to that and
surprise the workers. Please g
see what you think.
HCN/bjh
--:1`~F'
,~
--~ ,
` . ,~ [' ~
S -
{i ,.
_ i - - -. ~ ..- __ - - _
-~ -- ._t ~..: -
v .~ '':ti i
lls_,.
-. ..
S
- (( { ,t}i
.~ ~ :?
-. i+ ( :. :- ~ _.... 1.
_
:: ~ !e!
::
--~.. .:~r: ~= a
;t
~ v { .. Y - t ~~i ~~ -
A
f 1~ ,~. 47 ~.. ,
f` i
a, ,r ,~~..A,~n aid d~:~ir~es ~,f clue
Tt-t~ ~y. ~, ,.,.
,- ~,-,~F~~' ',, a~: roximately
_ ,. _ _ .... ;v;
i .:
ice. f; ~. -- -_,' ,-__.. F
- ~-
-_; 5' _- ~`-- -- - - --_ _ - -
! ( 1
~~;i~°_'+-TC~la1+~7.~,~; L-i1.r± 1±U,jN;±?L. - -...__r±1.tM..,.
1 3 ~:t~.~ b ~'`~,.1~,(,C11 s:. l" C_:i!_' ttte'S'.1
_ Y
- 34 t A .J ~ 1 r ~ Y S.L ~. } L' ; 3 s ~ a'_s_ fi
l'. ~. a
„f ~ •S 47 \7 t =
L. L.i tip _, v •}'.. _ - .-
~C 4~~i
-- :- ~r~,: -. - .
r
_ ., r'
i
-~-ro m ~1~-he. ~o nd ~e~Ye''~ur~l
~ush~' ~~-tls
-~ F' w ~~ W he-~-h~
~h~r~ ~s ~~u9h
_ ~,
~~ ~,
.,R.
~~~.... ,
F~ ~._. ,--.y
'~~`~ ~~
¢s7
f
6 ~ t ~:,
~i
.., i..
O~ POANO~-F
ti , ~ A /b'
a ~~~~ ~~
18 E5~ $a
SFSOUICEN7ENN~P~
~ Krauii~ul8e~innin~
M E M O R A_N D U M
T0: Elmer Hodge
FROM : R . Int. Robe r s
DATE: March 22, 1989
Elmer, as we discussed this morning, on my examination of the
school budget, I believe that there are refunds on workman's
compensation and on property liability insurance that accrue to
the school system and possibly, also the county system. In the
school system's budget, I do not believe that these refunds were
reflected. A ref~ondeo~ alwabilityscanmbensubstantialcY as well as
any rebates on p p Y
In your discussions with Dr. Wilson, please find out exactly how
much rebate they get on the workman's compensation and on the
property liability. I would also like to know what that figure is
for county insurance. Bob Jernigan might be able to give us that
answer.
RWR/bjh
cc: Members, Board of Supervisors
Dr. Baynes Wilson
3/22/89 @ noon Bob Jernigan says Roanoke County's workers comp is self insured. Any
dividend goes into a reserve fund for future losses. He will put together requested info on
dividend from property liability.
M H
Bob also said he was in a meeting with school people when the possibility of a dividend was
discussed and heard a ballpark figure of $40,000 for school refund.
u ~,R 17 1G83
AT A REGULAR t•1EETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY,
~;~)iiN l r ~~J'~11fvISTR~~TU~l VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATIOtJ CENTER
~r..N~~KE ~;;~;!INi'i, tai„",.,:. MARCH 8, 1983
,,;
RESOLUTION NO. 83-43 ESTABLISHI(JG A POLICY AND AUTHORIZING
AtiD D I RECT I NG TAE~6URTY ADh1I N I STRATOR TO ESTABLISH AND COLLECT
RENTAL FEE AND CHAP,GES FOR OUTSIDE USE OF THE RCAC COMMUNITY ROOM
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia, as follows:
1. That the policy of the Board relating to use of the RCAC
7J ..
Community P.oom shall be to permit such use limited to the following
groups, to--~it:
~- _'~``~
u ~ ~~~ ~.~
` ~ tf-,v
' C
vote:
~:
~'`~'''~~ ~ 2. That the County Administrator be, and he hereby is, authorized
to establish and collect rental fees and charges for outside use of the RCAC
Community Room taking into consideration personnel costs, utility cost
and set-up cost using generally a base charge and hourly rate criteria;
and
3. That the County Administrator shall, on behalf of Roanoke
County, execute a written lease agreement with each such outside user
upon forrn approved by the County Attorney.
On motion by Supervisor Minter and adopted by the following recorded
AYES:
NAYS:
(a) Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County
(b) County agencies, departments, committees, and commissions
(c) State aiiu federal government agencies, providing
informational programs for area citizens
Supervisors Minter, Burton, Johnson
None
ABSTAIN: Supervisor(Nickens
ABSENT: Supervisor Myers „
" A Copy - Teste: -
D~nat~1 R. lan~lPr~_ f.1Pr4
_ ~ ~~ ~~~
,~.~-~ ~ ~
_ ~.
~ POANpf.F (.. Z
~ ~ r
-~ ~~~ ~.~~ ~e
o =
a
_~ ~
18 ~~ 88
s ~P~ M E M O R A N D U M
FSOUICENtENN
A Bcauti(ulBr~inning
Me b s, Bq d of Supervisors
TO
FROM: Elm r g~
DATE: February 9, 1989
SUBJECT: COMMUNITY ROOM RULES AND REGULATIONS
several occasions arose when a more
During the past year, room than the
detailed written policy for use of the community
solution we are currently using would have been beneficial.
re on March 14,
I would like the Board's approval at tY:e meeting
to revise the approved resolution to incorporat Roome
1989' ulations for use of the RCAC Community
attached Rules & Reg eration would still remain
The details of the scheduling and op
under my direction.
In summary, I suggest the community room be used as follows:
Board of Su ervisors, Roanoke Count State and Federal
1.
Governments
p,, No Fee
B• No Application
2. Non Governmental GrouQs County Administrator
A. Requires approval by
B, Application required
C, pay $50/day Rental Fee
D, pay $10/hr Custodial 8er5ipem•Fee after normal
working hours G8 a.m.
3• Social ~atherinas
A. Requires approval by Board of Supervisors
(by consent agenda as per raffle)
B. Application required
C. pay $50/day Rental Fee.
D. pay $10/hr Custodial Services Fee after normal
working hours (S a•m• - 5 p.m')
4. Not Permitted - Commercial or Fund Raising• n and board
will be drafting an appropriate resolutlease let me
Paul Mahoney uestions or comments, p
report. If you have any q
know.
ECH/bjh
Attachments
cc: Paul Mahoney
« u7J^A~ ,'
For ®~sc~{~~~o~ ~{~~;~
~ Ry ~ ~ o ~r~USE oI'~Ct ~o t~f:V{S{or{
ROANO 1989
January
1• Permitted 0Se (in order of riorit ) and Fee Schedule:
- No F~
A. Board of Supervisors of Roanoke OountY
t Departments, g~loyees, Agencies, _ No Fee
B. Roanoke Ooun Y~
CoRmittees, and Carmissions encies - No Fee
C, State and Federal Gwer~ent: Officials and Ag
rnmental: Civic. Cultural, Political, Religious,- $50/Day
D• d Educational Groups (Application Necessary)
the Board of Su rvisors
2• Permitted Uses As roved _ $50/Day
lication Necessary)
A, Social Gatherings (App
3• Prohibited Uses:
p• ~nercial uses
'B, Fund Raising uses
4• ~ groking or Alcoholic Beverages Al,lawed.
meeting.
5. Groups are not to charge admission or ask for donations at anY~ must be
6, An "Application for Use of the Roanoke County Ocmnunlty R
as soon as possible prior to the date of the event for use by
~~leted royal will be by letter.
1D and 2A on~• AP'P
7, Applications can be obtained from the following:
Board of S~.ipervisors Office Box 29800
3738 Brambleton Avenue, P. O• 772_2005
Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 Phone= ~
nsibility for any damage
g, Organizations holding meetings assume respo orderly condition.
room or intents. The room must be left in a neat and
is reQuired, the organization will be notified and
If additional cleanup and hold
charged for this services mha organization will inderntii Y
n --and all claims for damages or injuries
harmless Roanoke County f unity Room.
arising out of the use of the Cc~nm Administration
9• Neither the name nor the address of the Roanoke C~untY
ter ma be used as the official address or headquarters of an
Cen Y
organization. in the
ui ment other than that situated.
10 . No additional lsu~ it~u useodrw ho P approval
~amunity Room
other equipment is a "Special Request" and permission must be
11. Use of
granted in advance.
Non-Governmental event (1D or 2A) 1 e hAdm bni Stration~Cen e~l
12, If the m•) of th
working hours (8 a.m. until 5 p• aid to Roanoke County
custodial services ~~n batathe nraetde ofo$10 00/hour.
General Services Depa
~ ~;m~~'
For [~~cu~~ior~ ®I~iy
~~~,~~~~ ~~ ~eVIS1~J11
~nunity Room assumes
13. The person requesting the permitnfor use of the
R ations and Rules for Udes ° nated
the responsibility for adherence ~ r~~n or a person especially g
Community Room", and either than Pe steel.
will ~e present during the time ~~ Board of
ect to change by the Roanoke Couthy Board to
14. These rules are sub} scheduling, and
Supervisors. The bounty A~ionstconcerningutheruseG, by
develop rules and regulat
operation of the Ccxtmur-ity Room.
Sp ht too alter or
Board of Supervisors reserves the rig Room for
15. The Roanokre v ously approved or scheduled use of the Community
amend any P
governmental purposes.
~~-~,~
~=~~ ~isc~ssi~~ ®nly
~~t ~~ Re~isi®n
APPISCATION FOR USE OF ROANOKE
Name of Organization
purpose of Meeting
pate (s) of Meeting
Probable length of Meeting
Time of Meeting
Estimated Attendance
tered with ~lpment.
Special Requests: Please report
diffi
any
culty encoun
(1) Will anya served? (Yes)
(Yes) (No)
(No)
(2) Kitchen (Yes) (No)
(3) Sound ~uipment (Yes) (l`10)
(4) Stage
(5) Overhead Projector (Yes)
(Yes) (No)
(I`~o)
(6> Carrousel Projector (Yes) (No)
(7) Screen (Yes) (No)
(8) Easels (Yes) (No)
(9) Blackboard
Additional or special requests
normal working hours, it is agreed that cust°di~nt.
If reservation is for othefoth~d paid to Roanoke County General Services ~Pa
services will be arranged
Person (s) in C9~arge of Meeting
Telephone Num~r
Address
f of the above named organization:
The undersigned hereby agrees on behal ke p~unty
(1) ~ be responsible for any damage sustained. to Roano .
property while being used by the organization; wise during
(2) ~ be present or have someone present who will supe
.the requested use' lations as set forth in the
(3) ~ conform the Roanoke Oounty Board of Supervisors.
attached by
Signature of Person Applying
Date
Address
'Delep one Nlunber
Approval Date
Rental Fee Received
Ctiistodial Services Fee
0~ ROAN ,~,~
L
~. .~
Z
z
v a
' E5~ SS
SFSQUICEN7ENN~P~
A Beauti~ul8eginning
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
ELMER C. HODGE
Rev. Rudy Holland
Berean Baptist Church
447 Dalewood Avenue
Salem, Virginia 24153
LEE GARRETT. CHAIRMAN
WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
RICHARD W. ROBERS. VICE-CHAIRMAN
CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
BOB L. JOHNSON
HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
STEVEN A. MCGRAW
March 29 , 19 8 9 CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
HARRY C. NICKENS
VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
Dear Reverend Holland:
On behalf of the Board of Supfrou~oas'reciationlfor yourake this
opportunity to let you know o March 28, 1989 to offer the
attending the meeting on Tuesday,
invocation.
We feel it is most important to ask God's blessing on these
meetings so that all is done according to His will and for the
good of all citizens.
Thank you again for sharing your time with us.
bjh
C~nun~~ of ~nttnnke
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
.:Very truly yours,
~e r ett, Chairman
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 2 4018-07 9 8 (703) 772-2004
O~ AOAN ~.~
~. ~~
o, a
18 ~~ $8
aFSQU1CEN7ENN~P~
A Bcautiful Beginning
(~nixn~~ of ~n~tnuke
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
ELMER C. HODGE
March 30, 1989
The Honorable Andrew Fogarty
Chief of Staff
Office of the Governor
Richmond, Virginia 23219
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
LEE GARRETT, CHAIRMAN
WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
RICHARD WEROBING MAGtSTER AL{DISTR CrT
BOB L. JOHNSON
HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
STEVEN A. MCGRAW
CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
HARRY C. NICKENS
VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
Dear Mr. Fogarty: Board of
At their meeting on March 28, 1989, the Roanoke County
Su ervisors adopted by Resolution 32889-5 a recommendatio rantee
p ment Commission serve as the substate g
the Virginia Employ Em to ment and Training
for the operation of the Title III, of the Job Training
Assistance for Actlointi the o 5ths~Planning District .
Partnership
Attached is our recommendation and the name of the contact person
for the recommended substate grantee. If you need further
information, please let me know.
Sincerely,
Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
CC: Marjorie SkidmoBoardlof1Supervpsorsent Commission
Roanoke County
P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24018-0798 (703) 772-2004
The Honorable Andrew B. Fogarty
Chief of Staf f
Governor's Office
State Capitol
Richmond, Virginia 23219
Dear Or. Fogarty:
The recommendation to the lovmentrandrTrainingsAssistanceeForoDislocated
operation of the Title III, Emp Y
Workers, of the Job Training Partnership Act in the substate area is:
Fifth Plannin District
substate area
Name of the Vir inia Em to ment Commi
recommended substate grantee g
1202 Franklin Road
Address
Roanoke, Va.
Local Office of State A
Type of entity
Name of contact person for Marjorie Skidmore
recommended substate grantee
Telephone number of contact 9g2-7249
person
Signature
Chairman Roanoke pervi
Title
O~ AOANprF
ti A
Z
Z
v `; a
18 ~~ 88
sFSQU1CENTENp~P~'
A Beauti~ulBeginning
C~nun~~ of ~n~tnnke
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR Apri 1 3 , 1989
ELMER C. HODGE
Mr. Norman Darnall
c/o Mr. Willie Bryant
Mason Cove Fire Department
3810 Bradshaw Road
Salem, Virginia 24153
LEE GARRETT. CHAIRMAN
WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
RICHARD W. ROBERS. VICE-CHAIRMAN
CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
BOB L. JOHNSON
HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
STEVEN A. MCGRAW
CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
HARRY C. NICKENS
VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
Dear Mr. Darnall:
At their regular meeting on Tuesday, March 28, 1989, the County
Board of Supervisors unanimously approved the request of the
Mason Cove Fire Department for a permit for a raffle to be held
on July 30, 1989.
The fee has been paid and your receipt is enclosed.
You may consider this letter to be your permit, and I suggest it
be displayed on the premises where the Raffle is to be conducted.
The State Code provides that raffle and bingo permits be issued
on a calendar-year bThis~ ermitfohowevere is only valid fo r the
December 31, 1989. P
dates specified on your application.
If I may be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to
contact me at 772-2004.
Very truly yours,
-~2G~.-~ .~.
Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
bjh
Enclosures
CC: Commissioner of the Revenue
Commonwealth Attorney
County Treasurer
P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 2 4018-07 9 8 (703> 772-2004
L E G A L N O T I C E
Notice is hereby given to_all interested persons that the
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a publi~cCHe28ing989'
evening session beginning at 7:00 p.m. on Tuesday,
in the Community Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center,
Brantbleton Avenue, S.W., Roanoke, Virginia, on the petition of J.
WOLTZ AND R. N. BRADLEY requesting rezoning from R-1 RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL of a tract containing 2.92 ACRES and located AT 3464
CHAPARRAL DRIVE in the CAVE SPRING Magisterial District.
Rezoning has been requested to CONSTRUCT
The County Planning Commission recommends DENIAL.
their
1989
3738
L.
to R-3
MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENCES.
A copy of the Zoning Ordinance of Roanoke County and amendments
thereto as well as a copy of the petition, site plan, and other
documents related to this requent mlocatedXin1Room1600hof thecRoanokee
Department of Planning and Zo g,
County Administration Center.
Roanoke County will provide assistance to handicapped persons
desiring to attend public heaPersonneluServicesl([703]a772r2018)tif to
contact the County office of
special provisions are necessary for attendance.
Given under my hand this 8TH day of MARCH, 1989.
`-~~
Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
Please publish in the evening edition
of the Roanoke Times and World. News on:
TUESDAY, MARCH 14, 1989
TUESDAY, MARCH 28, 1989
Direct the bill for Publication to:
J. L. WOLTZ
5249 CLEARBROOK LANE S. W.
ROANOKE, VA. 24014
774-5263
L E G A L N O T I C E
Notice is hereby given to all interested persons that the
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold.a publ~CHe28~ng989~t1989
evening session beginning at 7:00 p.m. on Tuesday,
3738
in the Community Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center,
Brambleton Avenue, S.W., Roanoke, Virginia, on the petition of WILLIAM
AND EUGENIA BALL requesting rezoning from R-1 RESIDENTIAL to B-1
BUSINESS AND TO ~ENDTION ofTaRtractDcontariningElI23Aand located AT 3511
DEVELOPMENT TO TRANS
OGDEN ROAD in the CAVE SPRING Magisterial District.
Rezoning has been requested to OPERATE MEDICAL OFFICES IN AN
EXISTING STRUCTURE. The County Planning Commission recommends APPROVAL
WITH CONDITIONS.
A copy of the Zoning Ordinance of Roanoke County and amendments
thereto as well as a copy of the petition, site plan, and other
documents related to this rZonint,mlocatedXin1Room1600hofothecRoanokee
Department of Planning and g
County Administration Center.
Roanoke County will provide assistance to handicapped persons
desiring to attend public hfaPersonneluServicesl([7031a772r2018)tif to
contact the County office o
special provisions are necessary for attendance.
Given under my hand this 8TH day of MARCH, 1989.
.~•
Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
Please publish in the evening edition
of the Roanoke Times and World News on:
TUESDAY, MARCH 14, 1989
TUESDAY, MARCH 21, 1989
Direct the bill for Publication to:
CARR L. KINDER, JR.
BIRD, KINDER & HOFFMAN
126 CHURCH AVENUE, SUITE 200
ROANOKE, VA. 24011
982-1755
L E G A L N O T I C E
iven to all interested persons that the
_ Notice is hereby g ublic hearing at their
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a p MARCH 28, 1989, 1989
evening session beginning at 7:00 p.m. on Tuesday,
Administration Center, 3738
in the Community Room of the RoanoVirginiay on the petition of JACK
Brambleton Avenue, S.W., l~oanoke,
BESS requesting rezoning from R-3 RES5422TSTARKEYBR~ADUinNthe CAVE trac
containing 2.16 ACRES and located A
SPRING Magisterial District.
Rezoning has been requested to ~Pn~'ecommendslAPPR~ ~ WITHTING
STRUCTURE. The County Planning Commissio
CONDITIONS.
Ordinance of Roanoke County and amendments
A copy of the Zoning lan, and other
thereto as well as a copy of the petition, site p
be examined in the office of the
documents related to this request mlocated in Room 600 of the Roanoke
Department of Planning and Zoning,
County Administration Center.
rovide assistance to handicapped persons
Roanoke County will p
Such individuals are requeste o
desiring to attend public hearings. 772-2018) if
contact the County office of Persfo~eattendance.([703]
special provisions are necessary
Given under my hand this 8TH day of MARCH 1989.
Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors.
Please publish in the evening edition
of the Roanoke Times and World News on:
TUESDAY, MARCH 14,1989
TUESDAY, MARCH ;_2.1.1989 Direct the bill for Publication to:
JACK BESS
3801 ELECTRIC ROAD S. W•
SUITE A-108
ROANOKE, VA. 24018
L E G A L N O T I C E
Notice is hereby given to all interested ublicnhearingtat their
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors milonhTuesday, MARCH 28, 1989, 1989
evening session beginning at 7:00 P• Administration Center, 3738
in the Community Room of the Roanoke County
Etoanoke, Virginia, on the petition of STEPHEN
Brambleton Avenue, S.W.,
AND MICHELLE WIKE requesting r1z131ACRESoand located ATI 681oSTA,RKEY
BUSINESS of a tract containing
ROAD in the CAVE SPRING Magisterial District.
Rezoning has been requested to ~on~'ecommendslAPPRO ~ WITHTING
STRUCTURE. The County Planning Commiss
CONDITIONS.
of the Zoning Ordinance of Roanoke County and amendments
A copy of the petition, site plan, and other
thereto as well as a copy be examined in the office of the
documents related to this request mlocated in Room 600 of the Roanoke
Department of Planning and Zoning,
County Administration Center.
will provide assistance to handicapped persons
Roanoke County Such individuals are requested to
desiring to attend public hearings. 703J 772-2018) if
contact the County office of Persforeattendance.t[
special provisions are necessary
Given under my hand this 8TH day of MARCH, 1989.
Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke. County Board of Supervisors
Please publish in the evening edition
of the Roanoke Times and World News on:
TUESDAY, MARCH 14, 1989
TUESDAY, MARCH 21, 1989 Direct the bill for Publication to:
ED NATT
1919 ELECTRIC ROAD S. W•
ROA,NOKE, VA . 2 4 018
774-1197
L E G A L N O T I C E
Notice is hereby given to all interested persons that the
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a publi~cCHe28;ng989~tinir
evening session beginning at 7:00 p.m. on Tuesday,
Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 3738
the Community Vir inia, on the petition of THE
Brambleton Avenue, S.W., Roanoke, g esting AMENDMENT OF THE ROANOKE
ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS requ
COUNTY SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE BY ~~STpROCEDURES~O~ COUNTY ON-SITE
SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEMS AND/OR WE
The County Planning Commission recommends APPROVAL.
A copy of the Subdivision
and amendments thereto as well as
documents related to this request
Department of Planning and Zoning,
County Administration Center.
and Zoning Ordinance of Roanoke County
a copy of the petition, and other
may atedXin1Room1600hofothecRoanokee
loc
will provide assistance to handicapped persons
Roanoke County
desiring to attend public hearersonneluServiaesl([703]a772r2018)tif o
contact the County office of P for attendance.
special provisions are necessary
Given under my hand this 8TH day of MARCH, 1989.
~-
Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
Please publish in the evening edition
of the Roanoke Times and World News on:
TUESDAY, MARCH 14, 1989
TUESDAY, MARCH 28, 1989
Direct the bill for Publication to:
THE ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
P. 0. BOX 29800
ROANOKE, VA. 24018
772-2003
LDGAL NOTICE OF A RDCULAR NlEETII~ OF TIC FtIQANORE COUNTY PLANNING OQrl~~IISSION
Notice is hereby given to all interested persons that the Roanoke County Planning
lic hearing at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, March 7, 1989, in the
Commission will hold a pub
Community Room of the Roanoke County Ar~ninistration Center, 3738 Brambleton Avenue,
SW, in Roanoke, Virginia to hear the following requests:
Meadows vel.opers to vacate a portion of State Route 116
1. Petiti of Pa kway ~
n ~e~ou i o o directly east of the
right of- Y isterial
oa d er i in the Vinton Mag
intersection of Jae Va ley
District.
2. Petition of Jack Bess to rezone a 2.16 acre tract frame -31o~t de atta5422
' -1, Business to operate an office in an existing structu ,
r~
rim Magisterial District.
'tarkey Road in the Cave Sp g _
3. Petition of William and Eugenia Ball to amendZransition andntourezone
v designation of a 1.23 acre tract from Development ~ rate medical
j said property from R-1, Residential to B-1, Business to ope
offices in an existing structure at 3511 Ogden Road in the Cave Spring
. Magisterial District.
4. Petition of Stephen and Michelle Wike to rezone a 1.13 acre tract from R-1,
' Residential to B~-1, Business to operate an office in an existing structure,
~ . ri Magisterial District.
located at 5681 Starkey Road in the Cave Sp ng
5. Petition of the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors to ~eOn-SiteRSewage
County Subdivision Ordinance by adopting the Roanoke Coun y
Disposal Systems and/or Wells Procedurees•
All plans and ordinances are available for inspection in the Depaa tme~ntn ke
Planning and Zoning, Room 600, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, Roanoke, Vi g
t will rovide assistance to handicapped persons desiring to attend public
Coun y P
hearings. Such individuals are requested to contact they tend ~fice of Personn
Services 703/772-2018 if special provisions are needs •for
Given under my hand this 16th day of February,
please publish evening edition Terrance Harrington, cretary
Roanoke Times & World-News
February 21, 1989
February 28, 1989
Please bill: Roanoke County Planning & Zoning
P.O. Box 29800, Roanoke, VA 24018
., / JACK G. BESS
VIRGINIA CERTIFIED LAND SURVEYOR
9801 ELECTRIC ROAD, 8•W.
SUITE A-IOB
ROANOKE, VA. 24018
February 6, 1989
To The Honorable Supervisors of Roanoke County:
This letter of application is a request that the County of Roanokfrom
rezone the property at 5422 Starkey Road S. W. in Roanoke County
R-3 to B-l. The effects of changes on the surroendinwillebe going
opinion, will bBup°nessvwithnretail sabescto aoProfessional Office.
from a Nursery
I am requesting the rezoning to allow me to use the present structure
for a Professional Office and feel that this use is consistent with
Roanoke County's Land Use Plan.
If further data on this matter is needed I will be glad to furnish
it.
Si cerely yours,
~' ~ri~
Jack G. Bess, C. L. S.
EVERY MAN IS A DEBTOR TO HIS PROFESSION
.__-__ ---~1
W FFICES
OSTERHOUDT, FERG , NATT, AIXERON £~ AGEE
APR FESSI CORPORATION
1919 ELECTR
P. O. BOX 20068
CHARLES H. OSTERHOUDT
MICHAEL 5. FERGUSON ROANOKE, VIRGINIA
EDWARD A. NATT 24018- 169~J
MICHAEL J. AHERON
G~STEVEN AGEE
MARK D. KIDD
January 30, 1989
TO ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
RE: STEPHEN and MICHELLE WIKE
Dear Chairman and Members:
TELEPHONE
703-774-1197
FqX NO.
703-774-0961
The Petitioners, STEPHEN and MICHELLE WIKE,
respectfully request that the above-mentioned tract of land
be rezoned from R-1 District, to B-1 District, for the
purpose of office use. The property will be utilized by
placing the office business in the existing structure on
the property. The property utilization would be in
accordance with the Future Land Use Plan of the County in
that the property is designated as Core on said Plan and
the proposed use fits into said category. This Plan would
be consistent with the existing properties in the immediate
area of the property which is the subject of this rezoning
petition. Therefore, the impact on the surrounding area
would be negligible.
It would appear that this rezoning would be in the
best interest of the County in that an existing residential
property would be converted to an office use in an area which is
developing as a mix for commercial and residential. The
proposed office is moving from its present location at the
intersection of Hunting Hills Drive and Starkey Road. There
have been no problems or objections with the present site.
It is therefore respectfully requested that the
rezoning petition be approved. If we should be able to provide
any further information, please let us know.
Respectfully submitted,
STEPHEN a nd M I CH(E~LLfEA WIKE
BY_ Cn~~~t~ ~1J?~L__------
Edward A. Natt, Of Counsel
EANIdle
JENNINGS T. BIRD
CARR L. KINDER, JR.
DONALD W.HUFFMAN
ROBERT W.GOODLATTE
LEA L.LAUTENSCHLAGER
MALCOLM M. DOUBLES
KENNETH J. LASKY
' _.__.~~
IR KINDER & UFFMAN
NEY T LAW
SUITE 200
126 CHURCH AVENUE, S. W.
ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24011
February 6, 1989
Mr. Terry Harrington
Director of Planning
Roanoke Department of Planning and Zoning
P. O. Box 29800
Roanoke, Virginia 24015
TELEPHONE
C703>982-1755
MAILING ADDRESS:
P. O. BOX 2795
ROANOKE, VA 24001-2795
In Re: Petition for Rezoning 1.231 acres on the North
side of Ogden Road at 3511 Ogden Road
Applicants: William F. Ball and Eugenia H. Ball
Current Zoning: R-1
Requested Zoning: B-1
Dear Mr. Harrington:
William F. Ball and Eugenia H. Ball are the
owners of the 1.231 acre tract located at 3511 Ogden Road.
This property lies on the north side of Ogden Road at its
intersection with Colonial Avenue.
William F. Ball is a physician currently
practicing in Roanoke County at 4102 Electric Road. His
practice has the name Roanoke Family Medicine, Inc., a
professional corporation, and he is the sole owner of the
professional corporation.
The property is currently zoned R-1, Single
Family Residential District and is being used as a
residence. Dr. and Mrs. Ball desire a rezoning to B-1
Office With Conditions District in order to relocate his
medical office, which is a family practice to the site on
Ogden Road. He and Mrs. Ball are willing to limit the use
to practice by no more than three (3) physicians.
The rezoning will not have any detrimental effect
an the surrounding area. The property adjoining the subject
site is zoned B-1 Office District, and it is bounded on the
south by Ogden Road and on the west by Colonial Avenue. The
building on the site will be retained as it now is, and an
addition constructed in the same style will be added to the
rear of the current building. More than adequate buffering
is being provided to protect the three residential lots to
the north of the site. Based on the limitation in the
number of physicians, the increased traffic will be minimal
and the majority of such travel will be at times other than
peak hours.
L E G A L N O T I C E
Notice is hereby given to all interested persons that the
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at their
evening session beginning at 7:00 p.m. on Tuesday, FEBRUARY 28, 1989 in
the Community Room of the. Roanoke County Administration Center, 3738
Brambleton Avenue, S.W., Roanoke, Virginia, on the petition of J. L.
WOLTZ AND R. N. BRADLEY requesting rezoning from R-1 RESIDENTIAL to R-3
RESIDENTIAL of a tract containing 2.92 ACRES and located AT 3464
CHAPARRAL DRIVE in the CAVE SPRING Magisterial District.
Rezoning has been requested to CONSTRUCT MULTI-FAMILY
RESIDENCES. The County Planning Commission recommends DENIAL.
A copy of the Zoning Ordinance of Roanoke County and amendments
thereto~as well as a copy of the petition, site plan, and other
documAnts related to this request may be examined in the office of the
Department of Planning and Zoning, located in Room 600 of the Roanoke
County Administration Center.
Roanoke County will provide assistance to handicapped persons
desiring to attend public hearings. Such individuals are requested to
contact the County office of Personnel Services ([703 772-2018) if
special provisions are necessary for attendance.
Given under my hand this 9TH day of FEBRUARY, 1989.
~•
Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
Please publish in the evening edition
of the Roanoke Times and World News on:
TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 14, 1989
TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 21, 1989
Direct the bill for Publication to:
J. L. WOLTZ
5249 CLEARBROOK LANE S.W.
ROANOKE, VA. 24014
774-5263
CONSTITUTION AND BY-LAWS
MASONS COVE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT
ARTICLE I-NAME AND PURPOSE
Section 1. This organization shall be known as the Masons Cove
Volunteer Fire Department.
Section 2. Its objective shall be the preservation and protection of
life and property from and during such fires and emergencies
as may occur in Masons Cove, Rortnolce Co~ntt'y, Vtrgina and
to lend assistance to neighboring towns and communities
when requested, under contract, or mutual aid agreemeuC.
ARTICLE bL-MEMBERSHIP
Section 1. The active membership shall consist of not less than
fifteen nor more than twenty-five members.
Section 2. Every active member must be a resident of Roanoke County,
unless otherwise approved by the department and 18 years
of age or older. He must be a citizen of the United States
of America, of sober and good moral character, and in good
physical health.
Section 3. Applications for membership must be recommended in writing
by a member in good standing. A membership committee shall
be appointed to investigate.
At the next regular business meeting the applicants will be
voted to active membership for a three month probationary
period. The applicant must then serve this probationary
period proving himself a suitable member by taking active
part in all departmental work. This departmental work shall
consist of 1.- attending all business meetings. 2.- attending
all training sessions. 3.- aiding in the general upkeep
of equipment and building. 4.- attending all fires. Valid
excuses for absence d>>ring probationary period shall include
sickness, accidents, emergencies, or other reasons approved
by tJ~e ~li~par.tnu~ne. The iuumber.:, shall. rtcc~~pt or di.suriss upon
c.uny~ I c~ l Ion u f l It f v p roh,t C i unary pc~r i.ud , acc•u rcl i n}; Lu the
secret ~alloti vote of the utajority ul tt-e: members pr~scnt
at a regular business meeting.
CONSTITUTION AND BY-LAWS
ARTICLE III-OFFICERS
Section 1. The operating officers of the department shall consist of
Chief, Assistant Chief, 1st Lieutenant and 2nd Lieutenant.
The administrative officers shall consist of President,
Vice-President, Secretary-Treasurer, and Assistant Secretary-
Treasurer.
Section 2. The department shall elect the Chief, and Assistanteariand
Such elections can be held at any time during the y
shall require a majority vote of the members present to elect.
The Chief shall appoint such additional officers as deemed
necessary.
The Chief and Assistant Chief shall remain in office
permanently unless removed for violations of rules and
regulations as stated in the Constitution and By-Laws.
Section 3. Board of Directors: The Board of Directors shall consist
of five members. Three of the Directors shall be the
President, Chief, and Secretary-Treasurer. The other two
Directors shall be elected from the Active membership.
ARTICLE IV-ELECTION OF OFFICERS
tion 1
S The election of President, Vice President, Secretary-Treasurer,
2nd
.
ec Assistant Secretary-Treasurer, Captain, 1st Lieutenant,
shall be held at the
Lieutenant and two additional Directors,
ularly scheduled meeting in June. Vacancies are to
t re
fi
g
rs
be filled as necessary by vote of majority members present.
Section 2. A majority vote of all members present shall be required to
elect a member to office.
Section 3. The term of office shall be from July 1 to June 30 inclusive.
Section 4. The election of Chief and Assistant Chief shall be defined
in Article 3, and Section 2.
Section 5. Elected President, Vice-President, Secretary-Treasurer, Assistant
hall be elected
Secretary-Treasurer and two additional Directors s
for one term.
1st Lieutenant and 2nd Lieutenant shall be elected
tain
d Ca
t
l
Section 6. ,
p
e
ec
E
for two consecutive terms.
ARTICLE V-DUTIES OF OFFICERS
Section 1. It shall be the duty of the President to preside at all
He
order
.
regular and special meetings and to preserve
shall appoint all committees.
Section 2. It shall be the duty of the Vice-President to assist the
President in the discharge of his duties and to officiate
in his adsence.
CONS'iITUTION AND BY-LAWS
Section 3. The Secretary-Treasurer shall collect all moneys due the
department and safely keep same for the use and benefit of
the department. He shall deposit all moneys in the name of
the Masons Cove Volunteer Fire Department in a depository
named by the department. He shall sign all checks, notes,
and drafts upon order by the department or majority of the
Directors. It shall be his duty to keep a correct roll of
membership of the department and shall note and keep strict
account of all absentees. He shall write in a minute book
full account nswerlallocordrespondencleeforethegdepartmentll
rECeive and a
Section 4. The Assistant-Treasurer shall assist the Secretary-Treasurer
at his direction and in the event of the absence of the
Secretary-Treasurer, act in his capacity as covered in Article
5, Section 3 and 5.
Section 5• shallesignaallTchecksebeforeytheyaaresvalid~ry-Treasurer
Section 6. The duties of the Board of Directors shall be as follows:
a. To determine the financial policy of the organization.
b. To safeguard and invest organization funds.
c. To act in the absence of the department on all matters
concerning organization welfare.
ARTICLE VI-MONEY AND EQUIPMENT
Section 1. All money on deposit or hereafter deposited under the name
of the department,
of the department is the exclusive property
rer only as
and may be disbursed by the Secretary-Treasu
tive members present
directed. by the majority vote of the ac
or the Board of Directors.
Section 2. Tlie equipment, including pumper, tank truck, nozzles, masks,
cellaneous equipment is
i
s
auxiliary pumps, hose and other m
of the department regardless of changing
t
y
the sole proper
personnel.
Section 3. Any person leaving the department, either voluntarilandrall
uity in any
his e
i
q
ts
by request, automatically forfe
equipment owned by the department.
l~
llon
S ~n m~~ml~c~r wil1~ 'I'hr~•c~ yt~.ir:; srrvt~•c wlio Icavc•s Clio dc~~nrLnx~nC
Y
to
,
cc .
in good standing, play retain his badge as a momen
C
.CONS'1't'iU'lION MID BY-LAWS
ARTICLE VII-MEETINGS
Section 1• deemedsnemessarysbyntherActive membershipl~all be held as
Section 2. The President may call a specialmbiiioTSpublicing by
notifying all active members by
announcement.
Section 3. The presence of at least ten members shall be required
to constitute a quorum.
Section 4. The presence of at least three directors shall be
required to constitute a quorum.
ARTICLE VIII-DISMISSALS
Section 1. Any member missing all business meetings and all departmental
subject to
ll b
e
sessions during a two month period sha
nless the member obtains
dismissal from the department, u
ress permission of the President or Chief to miss the
x
h
p
e e
t
meetings. Long periods of sickness, accidents, and other
emergencies will be accepted as valid excuses.
Section 2. hallcbeadismisseds
u
c
l
t
y
e
department s
the
to
discredit
o
bring
Section 3. Any member missing two continuous meetings shall be sent
a letter of intent.
Section 4. Any member missing two consecutive calls, shall be subject
dismissal by vote of
to a letter of intent; and subject to
the Department.
ARTICLE IX-AMENDMENTS
Section 1. No alterations or amendments shall be made to the Constitution
t a regular meeting.
i
ng a
or By-Laws unless proposed in writ
rred to the Board of
f
e
The proposed amendment shall be re
for study and then be voted upon at the next regular
t
ors
direc
the active
and shall require the majority vote of
i
.
ng,
meet
member;; present Ior adoption.,
CUNSfl'1'U'1'lUN ANll liY-LAWS
ARTICLE X-LIMITATIONS
Section 1. No rules or regulations shall be made which shall conflict
with the laws of Virginia, the Ordinances, or~the Resolutions
of the Masons Cove Fire Department.
ARTICLE XI-OATH OF ALLEGIANCE
"I pledge myself to fulfill, to the best of my ability,
the duties of the good fireman and to abide by the
Constitution of The United States, the State of Virginia,
and the Masons Cove Volunteer Fire Department. Further,
to keep all Departmental business CUllfideiltial."
ARTICLE XII-ORDER OF BUSINESS
1. Roll Ca11.
2. Reading of minutes of previous meeting.
3. Secretary-Treasurer's report and reading of bills.
4. Report of Committees.
5. Reading of communications and action on same.
6. Unfinished business.
7. New business.
8. Report on fires.
9, Nomination of candidate for membership.
10. Nomination of officers.
11. Good of the Department.
I'%. Adjournment.
Approved and accepted this
day of
19
President
Chief
Secretary-Treasurer
Masons Cove Fire Department Officers and the Board of Directors met
January 9, 1980, and approved the duties of the officers listed below.
1. Chief - Head Supervisor over all actions in the Fire Dept.
2. Asst. Chief - In charge of all activities and the up-keep of the
building.
3. Captain - In charge over all Dept. Vehicles, keeping up the
maintenance: Captain is also in charge of_ holding
training meetings once a month.
4. 1st Lieutenant -Assists Captain holding training meetings, plus
Captain assigns any other duties.
5. 2nd Lieutenant -Assists 1st Lieutenant and Capta:i.n in training
meetings, plus Captain assigns any other duties.
Recommended and Agreed on by the
Officers and the Board of Directors.
y„., t a~*~ ~i. f'~ ~. ,'krs'. ~''`a. ~~: ~`?~~ ,~4p~, K„ ~r.. •„ r.,~`~s ,~,,or z ~.:i -., s1 `:,
v i t,~' ~~'~ -~ ,,~. ~'R ,~ ,t7~1, 4•~ ~ ~;r'.~~ ~~ ~ .,
j f b I
F ~p ~ ~1 •yw + r~i. `.Y Et 3 t ~`.. Fs,. :~.'~`y. yy ,~, r S w-:;~-i
. ..' -, ~` r ~_ 1, w x~ ~t'~`S '~ - ~ .`~^'^- ""•"~"'~.."...'r*r.; ~ ~
f~. ~ t
. ~ J:.,r ~6 „~x' ~.....{4 .""'+..'.- ~ ~ ''d it
,; :r.. ~ ~~~w + ~•;rrFWyt „yFnr Y-~ 3 v,F~~~t1 .~.
_ .~.. ~ "I'" p r.
.~.T, ^' _ .+_---IT i. ;,.g.p x' ~ fit ~"
• ; _. __
,. r- -
~.
-
_. .-
--- - -
- --- --- _- 32 ~8 (3~4 ~s{taw_.- ~ ._.
448 _ Chi ~ko~saw .._A!'~._._
- _. __ _.. ~ ---- ..r .. .. .
.• ,r ;
~i ~~ ~ ----- Conner M-~e_~-a~L~. --- --
.. Sc~9ono~rec*Qaani~ ~ ---- -- --
_ _ - .. _ _ _ ~3~_Ol_~ c~~.b~.1?
~;~. _ .
-~: -- ----- - r---; ,
.•n
.. ,.
. .. - ..
. 9i 1 C~cfc
_. .~ ~ t
- ~ _-
~. ewtt.
e _~ _ _; , -
...,
_ __ _ _ -- -
_:_ Yl~rno~~ nn~.lo.1K . _ __- 1 Y
_ ---:.--- 353 ~ _ Ca~aw 60..1~0.L ~ D~•
_ _ _ . _ .. 1407 _:Nori•I~_..M~ l~_~d.•..~;:_ ,
_ ~.. __ _..- - r ~..:.
' ." . a
y
_~. _ ~.
~~ ~~~ S _
~ y _ . ,..,...
~ ~- ~.:
~ ~ ...
r ~~• (i i zh k~.' ~l.F yk
~; ~.. x~~ ~
g
7
i
.
~
, S.
r
f t
-
S ~
a a iw~w. ,Y ^ey.~Aa~ C WK . i -~ ~ ~
1 - r~.
•„
I.l
~ y
. ~ ~
~' "i
~.
,
~ ii
j
LL ~.
L
Y
j ~4~
x4
.
.• ~ ~
~ ~ t ~ ; ,
`~ r'• ~d`
~~i r ~_'~ ~
~, ~~
r
~ R ~!` ~ .
r C
.E
~ r
3
~
a ~, ,~
•
. ~
.
,cD.ir. ,
? wx x
la f ~r7°
t `f
'"
~
.
.w
~ ,6,
.
.
t,"
~._ ~. ~a+ ,~ww
• iL~+~~
f~ r
~
„
L
t
~~se _ ~ t~
Q r,~ /~fi~ACl JO~S-,
t .
1 p
- t
• { ~:J•
y
~ ~.-~"
Y ~
i~
~ ~}
t.
_ X.
'.ice =..•
_ < ~. t. yf
•~ t
~M ~ '
_
. _
Y! . 4 ~
~ Y Cf" J ~
~
• .. ,
.n ~
)t` i -
_ ~ c # ~t ~
~_ _. . ~.. ..rte.... ._:.
• ,T '.
•.S /
~ ~-id~p-s ~ ~
~ ~
't'- j -~ty~' _ i
A t
yJg t{
J' ~: , S J+ ! tCb Y
y'"..
'r • .. ,
_ _ _,.
--~ : ;~
a
! ~~
~
.. '~ :.~ ~.{~ s 3 I
sk '7.
~
~ ~.,
F
7 ~ -4
k
i.. • hf• ~~ Y Y A,y~ f .. Lr,~ a.,
~. 7s~~~1~ Y~$a .; vw.a4 s ..
The box(es) checked below applies to your situation:
^ 1. We have applied all or part of your refund to an obligation of past due child
and spousal support. Any remaining refund due you will be issued within
weeks. If you feel this obligation is in error, contact the state agency at
the address and/or telephone number listed below:
^ 2. Your refund or part of it has been applied to other taxes that you owe. Any
remaining refund due you was (or will be) issued
^ 3. We have applied $ of your refund to your unpaid account(s) for
4. Some items on your return are being reviewed; therefore, a portion of your
^ refund is being withheld. If no change is required to these items you will
receive the additional refund. If a change is required, you will be notified
within weeks.
^ 5. Your refund is different than expected because you made an error on your tax
return. The error was
If you disagree with this correction, you may appeal by writing to the
Internal Revenue Service Center,
within the next 60 days. You must state the reason why you disagree. If your
reason is acceptable, the remainder of your overpayment will be refunded to
you. If your reason is unacceptable, the Service Center will notify you.
^ 6. Your return is being considered for examination. You will be advised by the
Examination Division if any additional information is required.
^ 7. Our initial research indicates that you are involved in bankruptcy
proceedings and that your refund has been temporarily delayed. Your case will
be researched to determine the proper disposition of the refund. You should
receive your refund or be c~rtacted within weeks. '
^ 8. Your amended return has been received. Please allow weeks for
processing. If you have not been contacted within that time, please call our
office.
Department of the Treasury-Internal Revenue Service
Form 8034 (Rev. 7-84)
^ g. Our records indicate the estimated tax payments credited to your account for
- are
Date Amount
Overpayment From Tax Year
ISat e
Amount
. Payments
^ 10. The amount of interest paid to IRS during 19 was $ interest.
are applied in the following order: taxes owed, penalties, lied to
Therefore, it is possible to make payments but have nothing app
interest.
was ~
^ 11. The amount of interest received by you during
Interest in any amount on a tax refund is income to you during the year of
receipt and must be reported on your return.
^ 12. The balance due on your 19
Tax
Payments and credits
Penalties
Interest
Total Balance Due
tax account as of is:
If the balance due is not paid by the above date, additional penalties and
interest will be charged.
~ 13. The employer identification number is ~ .
^ 14. We are unable to locate an employer identification number for
In order to have an employer identification number assigned to you, please
complete the enclosed Form SS-4 and mail to the Internal Revenue Service
Center,
You will receive your employer identification number within 6 weeks.
Form 8034 (Rev. 7-84)
{, U.S. Government Printing Offloe: tftt--Ott-50S/20232
VIRGINIA:
B¢O~ THE BOARD OE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY
acre parcel of land, )
A~_
generally located ~~,~~ st~,°~T Rc1 S.Wl
Tir inia 7401/ ) ~~~7~
R ~ P CATION
within the
Magisterial District, and
recorded as parcel # 89.19-2-4&5 )
in the Roanoke County Tax Records. )
TO THE HONORABLE SUpEEtVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY:
Jack G. Bess, C. L. S.
WHEREAS, your Petitioner
has filed with the Secretary to the Planning Commission a petition to rezDistrict
above-referenced parcel of land from R-3
District for the purpose of Professional Offices
to B-1
WHEREAS, the petition was referred to the Planning Commission which, after das
legal notice as required by Section 15.1-431 of the Code of Virginia of 1950,
March 7 , 19 89 and
amended, did hold a public hearing on
WHEREAS, at that public hearing all parties in interest were afforded an
opportunity to be heard; and nded to
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due~considPpaoved withrpr~~red
the Board of County Supervisors that the rezoning
conditions.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning C~nisflland~b~~ e oned the
Board of County Supervisors that the above-referenced parcel o
from R-3 to B-1 and upon the
The above action was adopted on motion of Don Witt
following recorded vote: Witt
Robinson, Massey, Winstead, Gordon,
AYES:
~yS; None Respectfully submitted,
ABSENT: None ~L~
~ ~- .
Terrance Harrington SecCommission
Roanoke County Planning
VIRGINIA:
BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY
A 1.231 acre parcel of land, ~
generally located on the North )
side of Ogden Road at ) RECOMMENDATION
3511 Ogden Road within the )
Cave Spring Magisterial District,
and recorded as parcel 77.11-1-57 )
in the Roanoke County Tax Records. )
TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY•and
WHEREAS, your Petitioners, William F. Ball
have filed with the Secretary to the
Eugenia H. Ball,
Planning Commission a Petition to rezone the
Single Family
above-referenced parcel of land from R-1,
'dential District to B-1, Office With Conditions District
Resi
for the purpose of constructing and operating medical
offices.
WHEREAS, the petition was referred to the PlanriinC3
al notice as required by
Commission which, after due leg
inia of 1950, as
Section 15.1-431 of the Code of Virg 1989 and
ublic hearing on March 7,
amended, did hold a p
WHEREAS, at that public hearing all parties in
and
interest were afforded an opportunity to be heard;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due
consideration has recommended to the Board of Countyered
Su ervisors that the rezoning be approved with proff
P
conditions.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning
Commission recommends to the Board of County Supervisors
that the above-referenced parcel of land be rezoned to B-l,
Office with conditions.
The above action was adopted on motion of
OON WITT and upon the following recorded
vote:
Robinson, Massey, Winstead, Gordon, Witt
AYES:
NAYS: None
ABSENT: None
Respectfully submitted,
Secretary y Commission
Roanoke ount Panning
sd/G221 _2_
JIRGINIA:
EFORE THE_BOARD OF COUNTY_SUPERVISORS OF_ROANOKE_COUNTY
B -----
^STERHOUDT. FERGU:
NATT. AHERON & A[
ATTORNEYS-AT-LAH
RGANOKE, VIRGIN II
24G1H-tfi99
) ENDATION
IN RE: ) RECOMM_-- __--
q 1.13 acre parcel of land, generally )
located on the westerly side of Starkey]
Road, near its intersection with
Buck Mountain Road within the Cave j
Spring Magisterial )
District and recorded as Parcel
#87.18-1-40, in the Roanoke County ~
Tax Records.
TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY:
WHEREAS, your Petitioners, STEPHEN and MICHELLE
WIKE, have filed with the Secretary of the Planning
arcel
Commission a petition to rezone the above-referenced p
d from R-1 District to B-1 District for the purpose of
of lan
office use.
WHEREAS, the petition was referred to the Planning
al notice as required by
Commission which, after due leg
Section 15.1-431 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as
1989; and
amended, did hold a public hearing on March 7,
WHEREAS, at that public hearing all parties in
interest were afforded an opportunity to be heard; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due
consideration has recommended to the Board of County
ranted.
°N Supervisors that the rezoning be g
EE THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED tha t the P I ann i ng
NOW,
Commission recommends to the Board of County Supervisors
the above-referenced parcel of land be rezoned to B-1
that The above
District, subject to the proferred conditions.
'on was adopted on motion of Mr. Witt, and upon the
acts
following recorded vote: Mr. Massie
AYES: Mr. Witt, Mr• Gordon, Mr. Robinson,
NAYS:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN: Mr. Winstead
R4.n8.e
Respectfully submitted,
.~
Secretary planning Commission
Roanoke County
^GTERHOUDT, FERGUSDN
NATT, AHERQN & AGEE
ATTORNEYS-AT-LAW
ROANOKE, VIRGINIA
24018-1699
Z
~w ~ /
VIRGINIA. CHARTERED 1882
March 14, 1989
File #306-62-214
Mr. Paul M. Prtahoney
County Attorney
County of Roanoke
p, O. Box 29800 24018-0798
Roanoke, Virginia
pffice of the City Clerk
Dear n~1r. 1!-iahoney: I am enclosing
Counci l 119ember David A. Bowers,
At the request °f ur in.g the Committee on District
29493, g in the General District
copy of Resolution NO~udicial vacancy
a ] u on the election of
Courts to certify Third Judicial District, p
Court of the Twenty- Strickland as a Circuit Court Judge of
which Resolution No. 29493 was
the Honorable Diane Mc~• Roanoke at a regular
the Twenty-Third Judicial Ctrthet'City °f
adopted by the Council °f 1989.
meeting held on 67onday, h?arch 13,
an questions, please do not hesitate to call me at
If you have y
981-2541.
S incere l,y,
CMC
Mary F. Parker,
City Clerk
T~1FP: ra
Enc.
Room 456 Municipal building 215 Church Avenue, 5 W. Roanoke. Virginia 24011 C703) 981-2541
0. '
CIL44F THE CITY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA,
I N THE COI's
The 13th day of~`~arch~ 1,989,
.,\
,No. 29493. A
the Committee on District Courts ~-
w li~''~'~ ~" `=
in the General District Court of
a judicial vacancy
Judicial District, upon the election of the
the Twenty-Third
0• Strickland as a Circuit Court Judge of
gonorable Diane Mc.
the Twenty-Third Judicial Circuity ~~~
McQ • one of the
Diane Strickland,
WHEREAS, the Honorable Third Judi-
ud es of the Tweaty-
five General District Court j g
been elected as a Circuit Court Judge of
District, has
cial the 1989 Session of the
the Twenty-Third Judicial Circuit by
General Assembly; and
General Assembly has heretofore seen fit to -
WHEREAS, the Twenty
ud es to serve the
elect five General District Court j B
istrict which is composed of the City of
Third Judicial D Vinton and Roanoke
Roanoke, the City of Salem, the Town of
County; created by the
WHEREAS, failure to certify the vacancy
udiciary
f Judge Strickland to the Circuit Court j
election o
cklog of cases and impose an undue hardship
will create a ba and
Bar and judi~~Y~
upon the public, ~ that
WHEREAS, Judicial District
Twenty-Third
it is very important that the ud es;
served by five General District Court j g
continue to be
°`~ ~ ~ o f
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the-
Roanoke as 'follows:
~, G ~~-
1. T
~~ the need for five General District
• n+ f n>> rj~ t
Court judges for the Twenty-Third Judicial District in order
that a successsor can be elected to the Honorable Diane McQ•
Strick~la~nrd. ~
2 ~~''~he C~t9` Clerk is directed to forward attested
copies of this resolution to the members of the Committee on
District Courts, to the Circuit Court Judges of the Twenty-
Third Judicial Circuit, to the General District Court Judges
Third Judicial District, to the President of
of the Twenty- / ~ ~ S
the Roanoke Association and to the members of the General
~ urisdictions in the Twenty-Third
Assembly representing j
Judicial District.
ATTEST:
City Clerk.
Office of the Governor
Gerald L.Baliles Richmond 23219
Governor
March 10, 1989
The Honorable Lee Garrett
Chairman
Board of Supervisors
County of Roanoke
P.0. Box 29800
Roanoke, VA 24018-0798
Dear Chairman Garrett:
~ -~ ~. -~
~~ ~? w
'~
l,~` ~"`
~~
Employment and
You may be aware that Congress has rewritten Title ITI,
Training Assistance For Dislocated Workers, of the Job Training Partnership
Act (JTPA) in the Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act of 1988. As required
by the Act, the Governor reconstituted the state Job Training Coordinating
Council. The Governor also received and took the recommendation from the
Council designating the current fourteen service delivery areas as substate
areas for the state.
The Governor, by executive order, will establish a structure at the state
level which is consistent with the manner in which the dislocated workers
program has been administered under Title III of the JTPA. The Governor's
Employment and Training Department will be responsible for communication and
coordination with the United States Department of Labor. The Virginia
Employment Commission will be designated as the state dislocated worker unit,
with administrative responsibility for the dislocated worker program.
Another provision of this legislation requires the designation of
substate grantees. The designation will be made after the Governor consults
with the local elected official(s) of the area, policy boards, and Private
-Industry Councils. If agreement cannot be reached wi~~th the local elected
officials and Private Industry Councils through this consultation process, the
Act requires the Governor to select the substate grantee...
Marrh 10, 1989
Page 2
Under the new federal law, the following entities are eligible for
designation as substate grantees:
(1) service delivery area grant recipients or administrative entities;
`v (2) local offices of state agencies;
(3) other public agencies, such as community colleges and area vocational
schools;
(4) units of general local government in the substate area, or agencies
of local government;
(5) private nonprofit organizations; and
(6) Private Industry Councils in the substate area.
The federal law also requires substate grantees to use funds to:
° provide basic readjustment services to workers;
° provide training services to workers (including classroom, on-the-job,
basic and remedial education and literacy); and
° provide needs-related payments (payments made to a worker who does not
qualify for unemployment compensation or who has ceased to qualify for
unemployment compensation and who is in training).
A substate grantee may provide these services directly or through
contract, grant or agreement with service providers.
Please provide your recommendation to the Governor by Marcleaseokeepein
attached sheet for the substate grantee for your area. Also, p
mind that any recommended desth~nedulyul~ b9$9ble to provide services and be
ready for operation no later
If you have any questions, feel free to call either Valorie P. Watkins or
Richard A. Arenstein in the Governor's Office at 786-2211.
Please accept my sincere appreciation for your assistance concerning this
matter.
Very truly yours,
~•
ndrew B. Fog Y
Chief of Staf
ABF/dpb
Attachment
cc: Richard Arenstein
Valorie Watkins
The Honorable Andrew B. Fogarty
Chief of Staff
Governor's Office
State Capitol
Richmond, Virginia 23219
Dear Dr. Fogarty:
The recommendation to the Governor for the substate grantee for the
operation of the Title III, Employment and Training Assistance For Dislocated
Workers, of the Job Training Partnership Act in the substate area is:
substate area ~~~ ~lo~-rte n r i'1 c~ ~~ ~-
Name of the ~! r,~ ~ h ~ ~ ~-~-y~ ~ ~D y m-2~ ~ ~~"~'l ~
recommended substate grantee ~
Address /a D a ~/`G~ i`-~' l~
Type of entity
Name of contact person for S~~d /'Y)b/'~.
recommended substate grantee ~ ~ Orle
Telephone number of contact ~ F ~ _ ~ a ,,~
person d
Signature
Title