HomeMy WebLinkAbout5/9/1989 - RegularU LII~
~~~
~y
,~~~4°
~~
:~~~~-~~ ~ v~
~~- ~ ~~' .,; ~ c" ~ ~
o ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~
~ ,: ~ ~
n. ~.
'~ o
;, ~
;~r
O' ,a,,,;~ v~P:
~ ~ ~ ~ ~-
~~, ~~ ~
~- ~ ~ ,
/ \ /~
~~~K~T~p `~ ~ ~ ,~ C
SQ.N. ~~F ~
~ ~. ~ ~' O f~ T f-t~,1 1
D , ~, ~'
~ v~. ~
~ ~ ,
~;~-
~~ ~P `~~ °~ ~~
~ C~ ~ ~ ~ o
` ELE .
I N GTON
.~ S~ -~ ~
~ --- ~ ~
~ ~~
L.AKEV I~ti11r.~~~~.~.;~~~~ ~,
COUR~~~..t~:~~~"~~~. y
~ ,. ~ 5
~ ~ ~
-,
o ~
~ ~
~ ~~ A~~
~ ~ 2~
~~ o
~ ROAN ~'
F
ti •~ %
2 A
a= C~~~~ ~
18 ,~. 8 ~ ~~11~
8
aFSOVICENTENN~P~ ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
A Btauti~ulBtginnin~y
ACTION AGENDA
MAY 9, 1989
Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meeting. Regular
meetings are held on the second Tuesday and the fourth Tuesday at 3:00
P•m. Public Hearings will be heard at 7:00
of each month. Deviations from this schedule will beeannounceduesday
TODAY IS STUDENT GOVERNMENT DAY. THERE WILL BE A MOCK BOARD OF
SUPERVISORS MEETING AT 1:30 P.M. IN THE COMMUNITY ROOM WITH STUDENTS
FROM ROANOKE COUNTY HIGH SCHOOLS PARTICIPATING IN THE MEETING.
A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.)
1• Roll Call: SUPERVISOR MCGRAW ABSENT
2• Invocation: The Reverend Mark Graham
St. John's Lutheran Church
3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag.
B- REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA
ITEMS.
LG REQUESTED ITEM E-3 BE CONTINUED TO 5/23/89
RR REQUESTED ITEM L-7 BE REMOVED FROM CONSENT FOR DISCUSSION
C. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS AND AWARDS
1• Recognition of Roanoke County students participating in
Student Government Day.
2• Resolution of Appreciation upon the retirement of
Letcher K. Morris
R-S---- 98 9-i
LG/HCN TO ADOPT
URC WITH SAM ABSENT
3• Resolution of Appreciation upon the retirement of
James M. St. Clair
RR-5`
LG/HCN TO ADOPT
URC WITH SAM ABSENT
4. Proclamation declaring the week of May 14 - 20, 1989 as
National Historic Preservation Week
LG/HCN
URC WITH SAM ABSENT
5. Proclamation declaring the week of May 14 - 20, 1989 as
Virginia Tourism Week.
HCN/BLJ
URC WITH SAM ABSENT
6. Presentation on All-America City competition.
D• WORK SESSION
1. Proposed Anti-cruise Ordinance
LG REQUESTED OBENSHAIN, BURKART, KAVANAUGH TO MEET TO SEEK SOLUTIONS
TO THE PROBLEM.
BLJ REQUESTED THAT ENGINEERING CHECK THE POSSIBILITY OF USING ACCESS
FROM BOXLEY HILLS TO AIRPORT ROAD AND REQUESTED SHERIFF TO REPORT BACK
HOW MUCH ADDITIONAL FUNDING WOULD BE NECESSARY TO PAY OVERTIME FOR
INCREASED PATROL IN THE AREA,
HCN REQUESTED STAFF DISCUSS THE POSSIBILITY WITH SHOPPING CENTERS OF
PROVIDING PARKING AND RECREATION AFTER 9 p,M,
E. NEW BUSINESS
1. Authorization to increase building permit fees
A-5989_-3
HCN/LG TO APPROVE
URC WITH SAM ABSENT
2. Request to ratify Roanoke County Risk Management
Program.
A-5989-4
LG/HCN TO RATIFY
URC WITH SAM ABSENT
3• Approval of Parks and Recreation plans for the
Glenvar area.
CONTINUED TO 5/23/89
4. Request from the Better Beginnings Coalition for
5500 to fund planning session for area social
service agencies.
2
~-5989-5
HCN/RR TO APPROVE
URC WITH SAM ABSENT
F'• REQUEST FOR WORK SESSIONS
G. RE4UESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS
H. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES
1. Ordinance authorizing the issuance of not to
exceed $470,000 bonds to finance the purchase of
equipment for school purposes, and Ordinance
repealing and rescinding ordinance 41189-10 which
authorized the issuance of $440,000 General
Obligation Bonds to finance the purchase of
equipment for school purposes.
BLJ/HCN TO APPROVE 1ST READING
2ND - 5/23/89
URC WITH SAM ABSENT
2. Ordinance establishing the 1989/90 fiscal year
budget.
BLJ/LG TO TABLE
TO 5/23/89
URC WITH SAM ABSENT
I. SECOND REAPING OF ORDINANCES
1. Ordinance authorizing the donation of Parcel 1, Part
Tract 3, C. L. Bush Estate, containing .98 acre to the
Town of Vinton.
9-5989-6
BLJ/RR TO APPROVE ORD
URC WITH SAM ABSENT
2. Ordinance accepting an offer for and authorizing the
sale of 1.4 acres, more or less, in the Southwest
Industrial Park.
3
9-5-- 9~ 7
RR/HCN TO APPROVE ORD
URC WITH SAM ABSENT
3. Ordinance authorizing the lease of 10.40 acres of real
estate to John D. Willey.
Q-S-- g=
BLJ/RR TO APPROVE ORD
URC WITH SAM ABSENT
4. Ordinance amending Article II, "VircTinia S at wid Fire
Prevention ~p~, '~ of Chapter 9, " pr
Protec ion," of the Roanoke County~C de by theoaddition
of Section F-318.1, kin Devices on and and r
Balconies."
0-5989-9
HCN/RR TO APPROVE ORD
URC WITH SAM ABSENT
5. Ordinance authorizing petition of Old Heri ~cr,,,~
r r tion and Rocked 1 O parries Corr~ora ion to
vacate portion of a 50-foot right-of-way referred to as
"North Mountain Drive", Section 5, Southern Pines
Subdivision, Cave Spring Magisterial District.
4-59R9-10
LG/RR TO APPROVE ORD
URC WITH SAM ABSENT
6. Ordinance authorizing petition of Roy Lochner to vacate
a 15-foot public utility easement, between Lots 3 and
4, Block 1, Section 1, Highfield Farms Subdivision,
Windsor Hills Magisterial District.
0-5989-11
LG/HCN TO APPROVE ORD
URC WITH SAM ABSENT
J. APPOINTMENTS
1. Board of Zoning Appeals
2. Clean Valley Council
HCN NOMINATED VICE REYNOLDS
3. Community Corrections Resources Board
4. Fifth Planning District Commission
HCN NOMINATED ALFRED ANDERSON FOR REAPPOINTMENT
4
5. Landfill Citizens Advisory Committee
6. Parks & Recreation Advisory Commission
7. Court Service Unit Advisory Council/Youth and
Family Services Advisory Board
K. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS
SUPERVISnR ROBERS• (1) PREPARED A DRAFT LETTER TO VARIOUS
BUSINESS FOR BOARD MEMBERS SIGNATURE ASKING THAT THEY REFRAIN
FROM USING CONTAINERS THAT ARE NOT RECYCLABLE. BLJ SUGGESTED
THAT COUNTY MAKE SURE THIS DOES NOT NEGATIVELY IMPACT ANY ROANOKE
VALLEY BUSINESSES. (2) MET WITH STATE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
PEOPLE TO DISCUSS IMPROVED ECON. DEVELOPMENT EFFORTS IN ROANOKE
COUNTY.
SUPERVISOR NICKENS• (1) ASKED THAT PARKS AND REC. PREPARE A
REPORT ON THE THERAPEUTICS PROGRAM, PARTICUr•ART,y WITH RESIDENCY
OF PROGRAM USERS. (2) REQUESTED THAT STAFF LOOK INTO
RESURFACING BASKETBALL COURTS AND REPLACING NETS AND BACKBOARDS
AT VARIOUS COUNTY PLAYGROUNDS. (3) ASK IF FUNDS LEFT OVER FROM
PARK BOND MONEY COULD BE USED FOR EXPANSION AND TREATMENT OF THE
STONEBRIDGE PARK PARKING LOT. (4) RESIGNED AS A MEMBER OF THE
CONSOLIDATION NEGOTIATING COMMITTEE. MOVED, SECONDED BY JOHNSON
THAT LEE GARRETT BE APPOINTED IN HIS PLACE. AYES: BLJ, HCN, LG,
NAYS: RR, ABSENT: SAM -
L. CONSENT AGENDA
ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE
CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WILL BE
ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED
BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE
REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED
SEPARATELY.
_R-5989-12
BLJ/HCN TO APPROVE
WITH ITEM 7 REMOVED
URC WITH SAM ABSENT
1. Minutes of Meeting - September 27, 1988, October
11, 1988, October 25, 1988.
2. Request for acceptance of Horsepen Mountain Drive
and Horsepen Mountain Circle into the Virginia
Department of Transportation Secondary System.
R-5989-12 a
5
3• Resolution requesting approval of grant
application for Clean Valley Council.
R-5989-12 h
4• Approval of resolution supporting the membership
of Craig County to the Mental Health Services of
the Roanoke Valley.
R-5989-12 P
5• Acceptance of the
Secondary Syst em:
a. 0.24 miles of
b. 0.12 miles of
c. 0.16 miles of
d. 0.69 miles of
A-5989-12 d
following roads into the VDOT
Quail Place
Meadewood Drive
Byers Road
Lakemont Drive
6. Authorization to request Va. Department of
Transportation Revenue Sharing funds to
construction road and drainage improvements.
R-5989-12 a~C
7. Resain~iea-expressing-epprerrel-e~-~l~e-prepeseel
ntt:i~i- famiip-ele~eiapmer~ts-3eae~rn-ss-6rer~se-Pointe
Apartments-easel-Highgate-Apertme~ts-
REMOVED FOR DISCUSSION AND
SEPARATE VOTE
8• Acceptance of a sanitary sewer easement being
donated by K. Rae Martin and Sherry Martin, Lot
27, Block 3, Section 2, Kingston Court
A-5989-12 f
ITEM 7: Resolution expressing approval of the proposed multi-
family developments known as Grouse Pointe Apartments and
Highgate Apartments.
-4
jt-5989-1~
RR/HCN TO DENY APPROVAL
AYES: RR, HCN
NAYS: LG
ABSTAIN: BLJ
ABSENT: S~
M. CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS
6
NONE
N. REPORTS
BLJ/LG TO RECEIVE AND FILE
URC WITH SAM ABSENT
1. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance
2. General Fund Unappropriated Balance
3. Board Contingency Fund
0- WORK SESSION
1. 75/25 Economic Development Strategy
HCN/BLJ TO SCHEDULE A WORK SESSION 6/14/89
URC WITH SAM ABSENT
BLJ REQUESTED REPORT WITH RECOMMENDATIONS PRIOR WORK SESSION
P. EXECUTIVE SESSION pursuant to the Code of Virginia
Section 2.1-344
NONE
RR REQUESTED ASSISTANCE FOR CITIZEN WHO PURCHASED HOME AND LATER
FOUND OUT PROPERTY WAS ZONED INDUSTRIAL AND CANNOT GET FINANCING.
REQUESTED STAFF TO WORK TOWARD A SOLUTION.
Q. ADJOURNMENT AT 6:00 P.M.
BLJ/HCN TO ADJOURN - UVV
7
of aoaNO~~
•~
2 A
~ _
C~~ ~
150 ,~ ~ i
18 .~~ 88
SFSQUfCENTENN~P~ ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
A Beauri~uJBeKinninJ;
AGENDA
MAY 9, 1989
Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meeting. Regular
meetings are held on the second Tuesday and the fourth Tuesday at 3:00
P.m. Public Hearings will be heard at 7:00 p.m on the fourth Tuesday
of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced.
TODAY IS STUDENT GOVERNMENT DAY. THERE WILL BE A MOCK BOARD OF
SUPERVISORS MEETING AT 1:30 P.M. IN THE COMMUNITY ROOM WITH STUDENTS
FROM ROANOKE COUNTY HIGH SCHOOLS PARTICIPATING IN THE MEETING.
A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.)
1. Roll Call.
2. Invocation: The Reverend Mark Graham
St. John's Lutheran Church
3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag.
B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA
ITEMS.
C. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS AND AWARDS
1. Recognition of Roanoke County students participating in
Student Government Day.
2. Resolution of Appreciation upon the retirement of
Letcher K. Morris
3. Resolution of Appreciation upon the retirement of
James M. St. Clair
4. Proclamation declaring the week of May 14 - 20, 1989 as
National Historic Preservation Week
5. Proclamation declaring the week of May 14 - 20, 1989 as
Virginia Tourism Week.
6. Presentation on All-America City competition.
D. WORK SESSION
1. Proposed Anti-cruise Ordinance
E. NEW BUSINESS
1. Authorization to increase building permit fees
2. Request to ratify Roanoke County Risk Management
Program.
3. Approval of Parks and Recreation plans for the
Glenvar area.
4. Request from the Better Beginnings Coalition for
$500 to fund planning session for area social
service agencies.
F'. REQUEST FOR WORK SESSIONS
G. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS
H. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES
1. Ordinance authorizing the issuance of not to
exceed $470,000 bonds to finance the purchase of
equipment for school purposes, and Ordinance
repealing and rescinding ordinance 41189-10 which
authorized the issuance of $440,000 General
Obligation Bonds to finance the purchase of
equipment for school purposes.
2. Ordinance establishing the 1989/90 fiscal year
budget.
I. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES
1. Ordinance authorizing the donation of Parcel 1, Part
Tract 3, C. L. Bush Estate, containing .98 acre to the
Town of Vinton.
2
2. Ordinance accepting an offer for and authorizing the
sale of 1.4 acres, more or less, in the Southwest
Industrial Park.
3. Ordinance authorizing the lease of 10.40 acres of real
estate to John D. Willey.
4. Ordinance amending Article II, "Virginia Statewide Fire
Prevention Code," of Chapter 9, "Fire Prevention and
Protection," of the Roanoke County Code by the addition
of Section F-318.1, "Cooking Devices on and under
Balconies."
5. Ordinance authorizing petition of Old Heritage
Corporation and Rockvdale Quarries Corporation to
vacate portion of a 50-foot right-of-way referred to as
"North Mountain Drive", Section 5, Southern Pines
Subdivision, Cave Spring Magisterial District.
6. Ordinance authorizing petition of Roy Lochner to vacate
a 15-foot public utility easement, between Lots 3 and
4, Block 1, Section 1, Highfield Farms Subdivision,
Windsor Hills Magisterial District.
J. APPOINTMENTS
1. Board of Zoning Appeals
2. Clean Valley Council
3. Community Corrections Resources Board
4. Fifth Planning District Commission
5. Landfill Citizens Advisory Committee
6. Parks & Recreation Advisory Commission
7. Court Service Unit Advisory Council/Youth and
Family Services Advisory Board
K. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS
L. CONSENT AGENDA
3
ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE
CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WILL BE
ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED
BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE
REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED
SEPARATELY.
1. Minutes of Meeting - September 27, 1988, October
11, 1988, October 25, 1988.
2. Request for acceptance of Horsepen Mountain Drive
and Horsepen Mountain Circle into the Virginia
Department of Transportation Secondary System.
3. Resolution requesting approval of grant
application for Clean Valley Council.
4. Approval of resolution supporting the membership
of Craig County to the Mental Health Services of
the Roanoke Valley.
5. Acceptance of the following roads into the VDOT
Secondary System:
a. 0.24 miles of Quail Place
b. 0.12 miles of Meadewood Drive
c. 0.16 miles of Byers Road
d. 0.69 miles of Lakemont Drive
6. Authorization to request Va. Department of
Transportation Revenue Sharing funds to
construction road and drainage improvements.
7. Resolution expressing approval of the proposed
multi-family developments known as Grouse Pointe
Apartments and Highgate Apartments.
8. Acceptance of a sanitary sewer easement being
donated by K. Rae Martin and Sherry Martin, Lot
27, Block 3, Section 2, Kingston Court
M. CITIZENS' COPIl~NTS AND COMMUNICATIONS
N. REPORTS
1. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance
2. General Fund Unappropriated Balance
4
3. Board Contingency Fund
O. WORK SESSION
1. 75/25 Economic Development Strategy
P. EXECUTIVE SESSION pursuant to the Code of Virginia
Section 2.1-344
Q • ADJOURNMENT
5
ACTION N0.
ITEM NUMBER C_ ~~
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: May 9, 1989
AGENDA ITEM: Recognition of Roanoke County Student Government Day
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
Today is Student Government Day and students from the Roanoke
County Schools have been spending the day with county and school
officials and staff learning how day-to-day local government
operates. Each participating student spends the day with a
county or school official or staff member. Following a luncheon,
there is a mock Board of Supervisors meeting with students taking
the place of our elected and appointed officials.
This yearly event was coordinated
the County Schools and Carolyn
Keith Cook from the County staff.
expressed to Carolyn Wagner ~
information and the agenda for
luncheon.
with Dr. Norma Jean Peters of
Wagner, Anne Marie Fedder and
Special appreciation should be
rho prepared the packets of
the students, and planned the
Students who participated in Student Government Day will be
recognized at this time.
~~'y~`
C/~Ltw1
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
Approved ( )
Denied ( )
Received ( )
Referred
To:
ACTION
Motion by: -
VOTE
Yes No Abs
Garrett
Johnson
McGraw
Nickens
Robers
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF R
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATIOON
CENTER ON TUESDAY, MAY 9, 1989
RESOLUTION 5989-1 EXPRESSING
THE APPRECIATION OF THE BOARD OF
SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY TO
LETCHER K. MORRIS FOR 14 YEARS
OF SERVICE TO ROANOKE COUNTY
WHEREAS, Letcher K. Morris was first employed on
December 15, 1975, as a Social Worker in the Social Services
Department; and
WHEREAS, Letcher K. Morris has also served as Senior
Social Worker since November, 1982.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of
Supervisors of Roanoke County expresses its deepest appreciation
and the appreciation of the citizens of Roanoke County to
LETCHER K. MORRIS
for 14 years years of capable, loyal and dedicated service to
Roanoke County.
FURTHER, the Board of Supervisors does express its best
wishes for a happy, restful and productive retirement.
On motion of Supervisor Garrett, seconded by Supervisor
Nickens and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, Garrett, Nickens
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Supervisor McGraw
A COPY TESTS:
l~-
Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Resolutions of Appreciation File
D. Keith Cook, Director, Human Resources
ITEM N0. =-~_
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, MAY 9, 1989
RESOLUTION EXPRESSING THE
APPRECIATION OF THE BOARD OF
SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY TO
LETCHER K. MORRIS FOR 14 YEARS
OF SERVICE TO ROANORE COUNTY
WHEREAS, Letcher K. Morris was first employed on
December 15, 1975, as a Social Worker in the Social Services
Department; and
WHEREAS, Letcher K. Morris has also served as Senior
Social Worker since November, 1982.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of
Supervisors of Roanoke County expresses its deepest appreciation
and the appreciation of the citizens of Roanoke County to
LETCHER K. MORRIS
for 14 years years of capable, loyal and dedicated service to
Roanoke County.
FURTHER, the Board of Supervisors does express its best
wishes for a happy, restful and productive retirement.
~~
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE ~.~°„~~
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, MAY 9, 1989
RESOLUTION 5989-2 EXPRESSING
THE APPRECIATION OF THE BOARD OF
SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY TO
JAMES M. ST. CLAIR FOR 12 YEARS
OF SERVICE TO ROANOKE COUNTY
WHEREAS, James M. St. Clair was first employed on
January 18, 1977, as a Cross-Connection Inspector in the Public
Service Authority; and
WHEREAS, James M. St. Clair has also served as a
Cross-Connection Inspector in the Roanoke County Department of
Development and Inspections since 1985.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of
Supervisors of Roanoke County expresses its deepest appreciation
and the appreciation of the citizens of Roanoke County to
James M. St. Clair
for 12 years of capable, loyal and dedicated service to Roanoke
County.
FURTHER, the Board of Supervisors does express its best
wishes for a happy, restful and productive retirement.
On motion of Supervisor Garrett, seconded by Supervisor
Nickens and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, Garrett, Nickens
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Supervisor McGraw
A COPY TESTE:
~- C;~'-~-e.e..-a~~-
Mary H. Al en, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Resolutions of Appreciation File
D. Keith Cook, Director, Human Resources
ITEM NO. ~ - 3
__
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, MAY 9, 1989
RESOLUTION EXPRESSING THE
APPRECIATION OF THE BOARD OF
SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY TO
JAMES M. ST. GLAIR FOR 12 YEARS
OF SERVICE TO ROANORE COUNTY
WHEREAS, James M. St. Clair was first employed on
January 18, 1977, as a Cross-Connection Inspector in the Public
Service Authority; and
WHEREAS, James M. St. Clair has also served as a
Cross-Connection Inspector in the Roanoke County Department of
Development and Inspections since 1985.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of
Supervisors of Roanoke County expresses its deepest appreciation
and the appreciation of the citizens of Roanoke County to
James M. St. Clair
for 12 years of capable, loyal and dedicated service to Roanoke
County.
FURTHER, the Board of Supervisors does express its best
wishes for a happy, restful and productive retirement.
ITEM NUMBER ~-`~`
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: May 9, 1989
SUBJECT: Approval of a Proclamation declaring the week of
May 14 -20, 1989 as NATIONAL PRESERVATION WEEK
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The Roanoke Valley Preservation Society has requested that the
Board of Supervisors proclaim the week of May 14 through 20, 1989
as National Preservation Week.
They have also requested time on the agenda to present their
comments on preservation in our community. Speakers will be the
Historian, Mrs. Deedie Kagey and Dr. John Kern, Director of the
Division of Historic Landmarks Regional Prservation Center.
SUBMITTED BY:
Mary H. Allen
Deputy Clerk
APPROVED:
Elmer C. odg
County Administrator
-----------------------------------------------
ACTION VOTE
Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs
Denied ( )
Received ( )
Ref erred
To
Garrett
Johnson
McGraw
Nickens
Robers
ITEM N0. C_
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, MAY 9, 1989
PROCLAMATION DECLARING THE WEEK OF
MAY 14 - 20, 1989, AS
NATIONAL HISTORIC PRESERVATION WEER
WHEREAS, Historic Preservation gives Americans a deeper
understanding of their richly diverse architectural and cultural
heritage; and
WHEREAS, Historic Preservation contributes to the livability
of America's towns, cities, and rural areas and promotes local
pride and community self-help; and
WHEREAS, Historic buildings, sites and structures as well as
prehistoric sites are important resources to our community; and
WHEREAS, National Historic Preservation Week 1989 provides
an excellent opportunity for all Americans to help maintain,
preserve and protect our nation's heritage; and
WHEREAS, "Look Homeward, America" is the theme for Historic
Preservation Week 1989, co-sponsored by the National Trust for
Historic Preservation and the local preservation and neighborhood
organizations in the Roanoke Valley.
NOW, THEREFORE, I, Lee Garrett, Chairman of the Roanoke
County Board of Supervisors, do hereby proclaim May 14 - 20,
1989, as
NATIONAL HISTORIC PRESERVATION WEEK
in the County of Roanoke, Virginia, and call upon our citizens to
recognize and participate in this special observance.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused
the seal of the County of Roanoke, Virginia, to be affixed this
9th day of May, 1989.
ITEM N0. C -~j
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, MAY 9, 1989
PROCLAMATION DECLARING
THE WEEK OF MAY 14 - 20,
1989 AS TOURISM WEEK IN
ROANOKE COUNTY
WHEREAS, tourism is an important part of the economy of
the Roanoke Valley; and
WHEREAS, Roanoke County is supportive of efforts to
encourage more people to visit the Valley through attractions
such as the Explore Project, the Blue Ridge Parkway and the
Appalachian Trail; and
WHEREAS, the State of Virginia has declared the week of
May 14 - 20 as Virginia Tourism Week in recognition of the
significant economic contributions made by travel and tourism to
the state.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
does hereby proclaim the week of May 14 - 20, 1989, to be
TOURISM WEEK IN ROANORE COUNTY
AND, FURTHER, the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
encourages the businesses of the area to support the efforts of
the Valley jurisdictions in promoting tourism and travel in the
region.
ACTION N0.
ITEM NUMBER C - (D
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE; May 9, 1989
AGENDA ITEM: Presentation on All-America City Competition
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS•
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
Roanoke County has been selected as one of 30 finalists for the
All-America City competition. The staff has developed a
presentation that will be made in Chicago on May 11th. Included
in the presentation will be a three-minute video which will be
previewed at the Board of Supervisor's meeting this afternoon.
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
-----------------------------------------------------
ACTION VOTE
Approved ( ) Motion by: Yes No Abs
Denied ( )
Received ( )
Referred
To:
Garrett
Johnson
McGraw
Nickens
Robers
ACTION ~~
ITEM NUMBER ~"-/
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE:
AGENDA ITEM:
May 9, 1989
Work Session - Anti-cruising ordinance
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
For several years repeated and vocal complaints have been
received by various County offices and officials from the
residents of the Boxley Hills subdivision and other residential
areas off of Williamson Road as to excessive traffic and
accompanying problems of noise, littering, and trespassing on
weekend evenings. At the request of Supervisor Bob L. Johnson,
the County Attorney's office has researched the legal issues
concerned with permissible restrictions, both direct and
indirect, upon vehicle traffic on public streets. Draft
ordinance language has been prepared with the objective of
strengthening the ability of County law enforcement personnel to
deal with these problems directly affecting County homeowners.
The purpose of this work session is to consider the
strategies available for addressing these problems. As this is a
multi-dimensional problem, it is likely that considerations of
law enforcement, traffic flow or emergency as well as the
adequacy of ordinances in the County Code will play significant
roles in ameliorating this situation. If additional ordinances
are appropriate, consideration must be given to the evidence
which must be prepared for presentation to the Board of
Supervisors to justify any significant restrictions upon travel
on public streets.
FISCAL IMPACTS:
Not known at this time.
-1
Jo eph~B. Obenshain
Se for Asst. County Attorney
------------------------------------------------------------------
ACTION VOTE
Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs
Denied ( )
Received ( )
Referred
To
Garrett
Johnson
McGraw
Nickens
Robers
Respectfully submitted,
~-
DRAFT ORDINANCE
Sec.
When the volume of traffic on any residential street exceeds a
level which will permit continuous movement of traffic and ready
access by any police, fire, rescue, or other public safety vehicles to
all residences abutting such street, any law enforcement officer in
the county is hereby authorized to temporarily close such street to
any private vehicle for such period of time necessary to reduce traf-
fic flow to an acceptable level; provided that any motor vehicle oper-
ated by an individual whose driver's license indicates the driver re-
sides upon such street shall be permitted access during the period
such street is temporarily closed.
Sec. Limitations as to gross wei ht of vehicles
g permitted on certain
streets
It shall be unlawful to operate any vehicle upon the following
designated streets in Roanoke County where the gross weight on the
surface of the road through any axle of such vehicle exceeds
thousand pounds:
LIST
On any street where the weight of vehicles permitted on such
street is limited by ordinance and signs indicating such limitations
are posted, it shall be unlawful 'to operate a vehicle in excess of
such weight on such street,except for the purpose of making delivery
or picking up a load, in which case such vehicle may be driven on the
restricted street for not more than the minimum distance necessary for
the purpose.
Sec. Procedures for obtainin restrictions on residential streets
1. Upon the petition•of not less than two-thirds of the home-
owners abutting any residential street in the county, the board of
supervisors, after reviewing the recommendation of the zoning adminis-
trator, may approve any of the following procedures to control or lim-
it nonessential traffic upon a residential street:
-2-
~~
a) establishment of one-way streets to promote the effi-
cient flow of traffic for the residents of such
streets;
b) installation of speed bumps or other physical altera-
tion of~~the surface of the street in such manner, num-
ber, and location as shall be jointly recommended by
the Department of Engineering and the Department of
Planning and Zoning;
c) physical barriers to control the manner of ingress and
egress to any residential street consistent with the
needs for access for public safety vehicles; and
d) restrictions against turns from a street or highway
across oncoming lanes of traffic into any residential
street.
2. Upon the petition of not less than two-thirds of the home-
owners abutting any residential street in the county, the board of
supervisors, after reviewing the recommendation of the zoning admin-
istrator, and after making a positive finding of fact of the existence
of any of the conditions set forth in subparagraph (b), shall estab-
lish one of the following limitations upon the volume of traffic and
hours of usage as follows:
a) between the"hours of 10:00 p.m. and 1:00 a.m. of the
following day, no more than one vehicle per minute
shall be permitted access to any residential street in
_.. _ _ __
any one direction. Durin such
g period the speed limit
for such street shall be 15 m.p.h.
b) between the hours of 1:00 a.m. and 6:00 a.m., no more
than one vehicle per five minutes period shall be per-
mitted access to any residential street in any one
direction. During such period the speed limit for
such street shall be 15 m.p.h.
~'
-3-
One of the following conditions must be met before the
board of supervisors shall approve one or more of the above
restrictions:
a) a family member residing in a dwelling abutting a resi-
dential street shall be afflicted with a diagnosed
physical, emotional, or psychological condition whose
symptoms may be judged with reasonable medical certain-
ty to be aggravated by noise, pollution, or other phys-
ical manifestations of excessive traffic on such
street. The diagnosis and prognosis shall be docu-
mented by the opinion of a licensed practitioner of
one of the healing arts.
b) twenty percent (ZOx) of the residents of dwellings
abutting a residential street shall be seventy (70)
years of age or older;
c) one-third (1/3) of the owners of property abutting a
residential street shall have documented evidence of
physical damage to their property 'exceeding
dollars in a one year period directly attributable to
excessive ~ raffic on that street;
d) excessive wear and tear to any residential street as a
result of excessive numbers or weights of vehicles
both on residential streets or as certified by the
county engineer.
Sec. Parking off paved portion of any street; exception
It shall be unlawful for any vehicle to be operated or parked
off of the paved or graded portion of any street or highway in the
county; except where such vehicle shall be parked or operated upon the
property owned by such operator or owner of the vehicle.
Sec. Driving while eating or drinking unlawful
It shall be unlawful for any person to operate any vehicle upon
any street restricted under section while eating any food, drink-
ing any beverage, or transporting any prepared food or opened beverage
in such vehicle.
~-i
-4-
Sec. Definitions
1. Grosa weight - The total weight of any vehicle or combina-
tion of vehicles and the load or loads as defined by statute or ordin-
ance.
2. Park - To stand (stop) a vehicle whether occupied or not,
for a period of time greater than is reasonably necessary for the
actual loading or unloading.
3. Property line - The line marking the boundary between any
street and the lots or property abutting thereon.
4. Residential street - Any street upon which not less than
three unattached dwellings for occupation by a family of two or more
abutt.
5. Street or highway - The entire width between property
lines or every way or place of whatever nature when any part thereof
is open to the use of the public as a matter of right, for the purpose
of vehicular traffic.
6. Vehicle - Every device in, upon or by which any person or
property is or may be transported or drawn upon ady street or highway
except devices moving by human power or used exclusively upon station-
ary rails or tracks. _
Sec. Severability
The sections, paragraphs, sentences,- clauses, and phrases of
this chapter are severable,.and if any phrase, clause, sentence, para-
graph, or section of this chapter shall be declared unconstitutional
or invalid by the valid judgment or decree of a court of competent
jurisdiction, the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs
and sections of this chapter shall remain valid.
ACTION # A-5989-3
ITEM NUMBER ~-
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE:
AGENDA ITEM:
May 9, 1989
Building permit fee increase
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR' S COMMEN,,T~S1:
BACKGROUND:
On March 14, 1989, the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
instructed the staff to study the possibility of increasing fees
to off-set the cost of hiring additional staff to help handle the
increased number of permits, inspections and service area.
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The Department of Development and Inspections currently uses
a building fee schedule that was adopted on September 1, 1974.
Presently Roanoke County is issuing permits and conducting
inspections at the cost of $4.00 to $10.00 with the current fee
schedule.
In order to off-set our current operating costs and the
approximate $64,000.00 cost that the Department of Development
and Inspections will incur, with the increased service area, the
following minimum basic fees need to be increased as follows:
1. Increase the current permit fee schedule from $4.00
to $6.00 per thousand for building or demolition with
valuation up to $20,000.00 and $3.00 to $5.00 per
thousand for valuations from $20,000.00 to
$100,000.00. This proposed fee schedule is presently
being utilized by the Cities of Roanoke and Salem.
2. Increase all minimum permit fees frorn $10.00 to $25.00
for small buildings, reinspections, electrical,
plumbing and mechanical permits.
3. Increase the Certificate of Occupancy for newly con-
structed businesses from $10.00 to $25.00.
~-l
ALTERNATIVES AND IMPACTS:
1. Approve the fee increase as submitted and authorize the
County Attorney to prepare the necessary Ordinances. The
anticipated revenue generated from this fee increase is between
$65,000.00 to $85,000.00 annnually. The effective date of this
Ordinance will be July 1, 1989.
2. Deny the staff recommendation and keep the fees, staff
and service area at current levels.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends Alternative 1.
SUI~MITTED BY:
Ai'fiold Covey ~
Development Review an
Inspections Director
-----------------------------------------------------------------
ACTION VOTE
Approved (x) Motion by: Harry C. Nickens/ No Yes Abs
Denied ( ) Lee Garrett to approve Garrett x
Received ( ) Alternative #1 Johnson x
Referred
to
APPROVED:
C~~ltG~
Elmer C. Hodg
County Administrator
McGraw Absent
Nickens x
Robers x
cc: File
Arnold Covey, Director, Development & Inspections
Paul Mahoney, County Attorney
ACTION #
A-5989-4
ITEM NUMBER ~-` o
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: May 9, 1989
AGENDA ITEM:
Request to Ratify the County Risk Management
Program
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
~~' ""' '~'~ _ A''"/
~~ a-~
~~
BACKGROUND:
~ ~~
On June 14, 1988 the County Board of Supervisors combined
the County and School insurance operations by establishing the
position of Risk Manager and the County Risk Management Program
to be effective July 1, 1988. The Board requested that the
activities, savings, and benefits of the Risk Management Program
be reviewed after one year to determine the feasibility of
continuing the program.
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The most important function of the risk manager is to
identify and measure all exposure to risk. Therefore, staff has
spent the majority of this year reviewing the adequacy of the
County and School property valuation. During this process, it
was determined that the school properties were significantly
undervalued. This has been corrected and now all school
properties are insured at replacement costs.
The Risk Management office has also been reviewing the
coverage levels and premium expense of each of the County's
insurance policies and has been able to generate $96,801 of
savings as the renewal periods fo.r_ these policies arrived (See
attachment A).
The County has received revenues in the form of dividends of
$224,077 that are refunds of prior year insurance premiums based
upon the excellent experience rate of the County (see Attachment
A). These dividends can be attributed to several things: 1)
The foresight in prior years to select an insurance pool over an
°~
insurance carrier; 2) our continued communications, support, and
commitment to that insurance pool; and, 3) programs that have
been developed in the County by the Risk Management office and
the Human Resources area, such as the Accident Review Committee
and the Safety Committee.
Combining School and County insurance areas has proven to be
very effective. We have been able to eliminate areas of
duplicate coverage (i.e. some parks which are adjacent to
schools) and have been able to offer coverage that was previously
unavailable to the schools by adding them to a County policy.
The savings on the attachment were generated from
County insurance renewals only. The majority of the School
insurance renewals will begin in the 1989-90 fiscal year. At
that time, we hope to generate savings to be set aside in an
insurance reserve for the schools.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The savings and dividends that have been generated by the
Risk Management area amount to $320,878 to date. As previously
approved by the Board, these savings will be set aside in an
insurance reserve. The growth of this reserve will allow the
County to assume greater liablity and reduce our insurance
premiums in the future.
Funding for the Risk Management area and the position of
Risk Manager are included in the 1989-90 budget.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends ratification of the Risk Management area
and the position of Risk Manager as a permanent function and
position of the County.
Diane D. Hyatt Elmer C. Hodge
Director of Finance County Administrator
-----------------------------
- - ACTION VOTE
Approved ( x) Motion by: Bob L .T~hnson/ No Yes Abs
Denied ( ) Harm C Nickens to ratify Garrett ~_
Received ( ) Johnson ~-
Referred McGraw AhGPnt
To Nickens ~_
Robers ~
cc: File
Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance
Robert C. Jernigan, Manager, Risk Management
Bayes Wilson, Superintendent, Roanoke County School
D. Keith Cook, Director, Human Resources
Reta Busher, Director, Management & Budget
Attachment A
Savings Generated by Risk Management
I. Savings as a result of negotiating with insurance carriers
and/or reviewing coverage levels.
A. Renewal of auto, multi-peril property, and accident
and health coverage for Roanoke County Fire Depart-
$
ments and Rescue Squad Units. 12,970
B Renewal of DIC (earthquake only) coverage was dis-
. cussed and decided not to renew. 3,111
C. As the result of a three month extended audit period
for auto liability, the VML Pool assessed Roanoke
County an excessive amount. After several months of
negotiations, this audit premium was dropped. 60,956
D. Renewal of building and contents coverage had an
increase of $4 million (10$ over 1987-88) in value.
Also, we were able to place all computer driven E-911
equipment with the E.D.P. policy which provides a
broader coverage. 5,439
E. Renewal of Worker's Compensation 7,625
F Accidental death benefits added for Fire Department
. and Rescue Squad units at no additional cost. 2,600
G. Change in auto liability coverage to cover any
"
4,100
auto
. 96,801
II. Dividends received based upon our decision to insure with
certain insurance pools.
A. Virginia Municipal Group Self Insurance Association
(Workman's Compensation) 7,928
B. Virginia Municipal Liability Pool
Received during 1988-89 55,777
Announced to be received in 1989-90 160,372
224,077
$ 320,878
ACTION #
ITEM NUMBER ~'
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: May 9, 1989
AGENDA ITEM: Parks and Recreation Facilities for the Glenvar
Area
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: /f
Gin -~,~'i l~wf~/i~cw
BACKGROUND:
At the April 11, 1989 meeting of the Board of Supervisors,
representatives from the Glenvar area addressed the Board of
Supervisors concerning recreational facilities in the Glenvar
area, including the expiration of leases for the Shamrock Park
area, McVitty Park area and lack of completed facilities at the
new Greenhill Park. The representatives made reference to the
commitment made by the Board of Supervisors on May 10, 1983
(Attachment B), which indicated that the County would not abandon
the aforementioned recreational areas until an equivalent or
better recreation area is developed in cooperation with the
citizens of the area.
To keep matters in perspective, Attachment A lists the
facilities in service at Shamrock Park and McVitty Park as of May
1983 and the facilities in the area currently in service today.
In 1983, there were four ball fields, one soccer field and one
practice football area in service. Since that time, one T-ball
field, one practice T-ball field, a second soccer field and the
new McVitty Field (on County owned property) have been added for
use by the citizens of this area.
The Department of Parks & Recreation is very much concerned
about the need and desire to provide suitable and appropriate
recreational facilities for all areas of the County and hopes
that the Parks and Recreation System can be developed in a
systematic and quality fashion rather than quick fix or poorly
planned methods.
The original written leases from Richfield would have
expired at the end of the 1988-89 athletic season, and the lease
from Lewis Gale would have expired on December 31, 1989. NO
LOSS of use of the present facilities is anticipated in the
foreseeable future based upon the letter from Dr. Bowling
(Attachment C) and the verbal commitment from Darrell Whitt
~~`
concerning Lewis Gale properties. He has agreed to an annually
renewable lease on a form which has been developed through the
County Attorney's office. (The new lease must be ratified by
ordinance of the Board of Supervisors.) With the continued use
of these facilities, there is NO loss of recreational opportunity
for the residents of the Glenvar area.
With regards to the continued development of Greenhill Park,
staff recommends that we continue to try to utilize bond monies,
grant monies, etc., in addition to local tax dollars to develop
this recreational area into a premier park area. At the present
time, four ball fields have been graded and seeded and monies
from the operating budget of the Department of Parks and
Recreation have been appropriated to provide the backstops for
these fields. The outfield fencing, which is currently in use at
Shamrock Park and McVitty Park, can be relocated to the new ball
fields providing the same level of fenced fields currently in
service, and arrangements will be made for a storage building and
portable rest room facilities to make the fields useable.
putlined below are three alternatives which may be
considered by the Board of Supervisors to provide appropriate
recreational opportunities for the residents of the Glenvar area.
ALTERNATIVES AND IMPACT:
Alternative #l: Continue to utilize the Shamrock Park and
McVitty Park facilities until Richfield and Lewis Gale have a
need to expand onto the subject properties, and continue to
develop Greenhill Park as monies become available. No additional
appropriation is required at this time to implement this
alternative.
Alternative #2: Continue to develop Greenhill Park
according to the master plan as included in the budget documents
for the 1989-90 fiscal year, which listed $80,700 to complete the
fencing and backstops at the the park and $389,000 for the
implementation of phase II development. No funding was included
in the approved budget for these capital items
Alternative #3: Transfer from other unspent bond projects,
$40,000 to provide for the construction of a combination
concession/restroom/storage building with utilities and the
materials and labor necessary to install the portable fencing
utilized on the three fields at Shamrock and McVitty Parks. This
proposal would allow one of the ball fields to be used as a
soccer field and a second soccer field and other practice ball
fields would have to be developed utilizing County manpower and
materials at a later date. The unspent bond monies are $16,669
from Walrond Park, $5,071 from Whispering Pines Park, and $18,260
from other bond projects.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that Alternative #1 be exercised by the
Board of Supervisors with the understanding that the County
should move forward as expeditiously as possible to continue the
development of Greenhill Park according to the park master plan,
and to consider all of the recreational needs of the County as it
attempts to prioritize capital monies available for park
development.
Respectfully Submitted: Approv d By:
.• ~,
ohn M. Chamblis , Jr. Elmer C. Hodg
Assistant Administrator County Administrator
--------------------------------------------
Approved ( )
Denied ( )
Received ( )
Referred
To
Motion by:
ACTION
VOTE
No Yes Abs
Garrett
Johnson
McGraw
Nickens
Robers
Attachments
". 3
ATTACHMENT A
WEST COUNTY ATHLETIC FACILITIES
AVAILABLE AS/1/89LE
FACILITY 5/10/83
----
SHAMROCK PARK
X X
I- 300' FENCED FIELD X X
1- 200' FENCED FIELD X
1- T-BALL FIELD (1) (X)
2- SOCCER FIELDS X
CONCESSION BUILDING WITH UTILITIES
(24'X38')
MCVITTY PARK
X X
1- 300' FIELD, NO FENCE X X
1- 200' FENCED FIELD X
1- T-BALL PRACTICE FIELD X X
1- FOOTBALL PRACTICE FIELD X X
CONCESSION BUILDING W/0 UTILITIES
(7'X8')
MCVITTY FIELD _
-------------------------------
1- 200' FENCED FIELD
~' Page 2 ~''~
Memo to McGraw
1/23/84
picnic area, we must go through the creek or walk back to the highway
. and along the creek bank. The parking lot at Shamrock needs some work
~ also. There is a large. area that ponds up water when it rains.
"SHAMROCK CONCESSION BUILDING: We have requested repeatedly that the
"access road to the Concession Building be improved. This is a dire need!
If in doubt, travel this road - it is an adventure! Mr. Shell also told
us in April of 1983 that a limited area around the building could be
designated for parking and some chips placed to soak up moisture. We
are still waiting. The Concession Building leaks very badly. When
raining, the water pours through the walls. This is a cinderblock wall.
Mr. Gary Huff informed me that "they" are getting a quotation on
sealing and painting the building. This will probably require a followup.
The drainage inside the building is very poor. The floor does not slope
toc.~ard the dr in and t~:e need more drainage for the icemal:er.
~- BLEACHERS: Two sets are needed per field - visiting and home teams.
/
,/~,~.L 1,
J v_ We presently have four playable fields = 8 sets of bleachers.
TELEPHONE SERVICE: NONE. The children have no means by which to con-
tact their parents if the need arises.
WATER FOUNTAINS: NONE. This would be helpful.
~ ~
~
~'
~ SHAMROCK SOCCER FIELD: We need one additional soccer field with goals
(
l" and nets. This could be done by pivoting the existing field so that
~ ~'~
L~- it would run North to South and putting in another field parallel to it.
~~„ An alternative site could be behind the baseball diamond at Glenvar
Elementary School. If the additional field is installed adjacent to
the existing field, a fence should be put up on the South ends of the
~
'~ fields behind the goals to prevent missed shots on the goal from leaving
of the Concession Building.
"
"
~
l area
busy
the park or going into the
v
~C^
~N
BASKETBALL PROGRAM IN EXISTING GYMNASIUMS AT THE GLENVAR SCHOOLS - 1984:
.
`
'~'" Unlike other Roanoke County schools, Glenvar High School has 8th grade
~ programs along with Junior Varsity programs operating in the same
facility as the Varsity programs. _
Programs presently operating at Glenvar High are as follows:
1. Boys Varsity Wrestling and boys J. V. Wrestling - presently
practicing in halls and a classroom. (12 hours weekly practice.)
2. Boys 8th grade basketball - presently practicing at Glenvar
Elementary. (8 hours weekly practice.)
3. Boys J. V. Basketball. (8 hours weekly practice.)
4. Boys Varsity Basketball. (8 hours weekly practice.)
5. Varsity Gymnastics - presently practicing early morning and late
at night. (8 hours weekly practice.) Junior Varsity Gymnastics is
presently practicing but is not competing.
6. Girls Varsity Volleyball. (8 hours weekly practice.)
7. Girls J. V. Volleyball.
8. Weight Program - operating out of the Locker Room. (6 hours weekly
practice.)
9. Sixteen teams of Glenvar Youth Boosters, Inc. - boys and girls
basketball. We are presently practicing at Glenvar Elementary.
(32 hours weekly practice.)
- G ypU i H
LENVAR
m.
G
. O ~,~
r
• P.O. Box 169
DATE: January 23, 1984
BOOSTERS
Salem, Virginia 24153
MEMO T0: Mr. Steve McGraw
Board of Supervisors, Roanoke County
FROM: Mrs. Yvonne Willis
President
SGBJr.CTc Iui~c•ovemencs for 1984
~~~
It is apparent that the Glenvar area will not have a Regional Park for
its use during the 1984 season. Therefore, we are requesting .some
improvements to our existing fields and buildings:
MCVITTY PARK: We need a practice baseball/softball field. There is
sufficient space to put this field on the McVitty Park piece of land.
We currently have two baseball fields below the Ft .'Lewis Fire Station.
We would like to place this practice field~in the. corner of the tract
of land near the highway and the truck stop. .Since the backstop at
the Glenvar Elementary Field is going to be replaced,. we could use the
wire from that backstop rather than discarding it. Also, the Boosters
could have the grading of the infield done and this would not cost the
County anything. The road going into the Little League field directly
behind the firehouse needs some grading also in order to make the road
passable and accessible. The Boosters could do this at our expense
also. The Senior Field on this tract of land needs upgrading. It
resembles a swamp rather than a ballfield after a rain.
LIGHTS: Due to the fact that the Glenvar area does~not have lighted
~~ ~"L~CetK~ baseball fields, FrP wou.1_d like to request that lights be ..put at the
~~ PLC Glenvar Hi h School Baseball Field and at the Glenvar Elementary Soft-
. bal_ 1 Field• We feel that this improvement is long overdue!
SHAMROCK PARK: The Shamrock ballfield has an extremely rough outfield.
This definitely needs some maintenance work. We have need for a Tee-
Ball Field at Shamrock Park. This could be fitted between the Shamrock
and Whitt fields with the backstop placed near the pauper's cemetery
along the Richfield Community property line.
We also need a parking arrangement worked out with Mr. Ted Russell of
RichfiPl communities in regards to the parents parking near Whitt Field.
Mr. John Hubbard stated to me that he would talk with Mr. Russell and
try to secure a designated parking area. This will need a followup.
We have asked repeatedly for a bridge to be placed over the creek at
Shamrock Park and we get lots of promises and no action! Finally, we
asked in 1983 that we be permitted to construct the bridge ourselves
at our expense. This request was denied. In order to get to the
~~
i~
~/
Page 3 ~`~
Memo to McGraw
1/23/84 ~ '
This schedule gives a total of twenty-three different teams practicing
approximately 84 hours per week. Game time takes approximately 18 hours
per week. These 102 hours of practice and game time is presently being
crammed into Glenvar High and Glenvar Elementary. With this in mind,
we ask that you please consider our need for a Multipurpose Room to be
added to Glenvar High School; this room could lend itself to many if
not all of our programs.
Thank you for your time and assistance in these matters, Mr. McGraw.
We certainly appreciate the fact that we have an accessible Supervisor
now. Please let me know if I~can be of further help in these matters
as regards more detailed explanations, etc... I will try to reply
very promptly.
Yw
CC: Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mrs
Mr.
Mr.
Tucker Harvey
Bill Goode
Junior Ligon
Pat Zirkle
Wayland Winstead
Charlie Russell
ATTACHMENT B
6 8 1 5-10-83
IN RE: REPORT FOR SPECIAL LEAVE FOR EUGENE RATCLIFFE
Donald R. Flanders asked the Board to deviate from the agenda and
consider this item. Supervisor Minter moved for the following prepared resolution:
RESOLUTION NO. 83-84 APPROVING A SIXTY DAY
EXTENSION OF BENEFITS AVAILABLE TO EMPLOYEES
PURSUANT TO RESOLUTION NO. 2027 ADOPTED BY THE
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS APRIL 11, 1978
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia,
as follows:
1. That there be, and hereby is, granted a sixty day extension of special
leave benefits to Emmett Eugene Ratcliffe pursuant to and in strict accordance with
Resolution No. 2027, sub-paragraph 3, adopted April 11, 1978; and
2. That ail and singular the other terms and provisions of Resolution No.
2027 shall be applicable to all special leave benefits granted to Emmett Eugene
Ratcliffe.
Adopted by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Supervisors Myers, Minter, Burton and Nickens
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Supervisor Johnson
IN RE: CITIZENS COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS
Mr. Larry Woolwine, 5830 Dogwood Avenue, Salem, representing the
citizens of the Broadview Subdivision, presented a petition and requested that
Broadview Subdivision be included in the federal funded program to have water
connections In their area. John Hubbard was asked to notify the State to take a
closer look at the private system serving this subdivision and enforce compliance
with State regulations.
Supervisor Burton moved to receive and file the letter from Hardy Road
Elementary School Principal supporting Roanoke County Sheriffs Department's
application for a Virginia Family Violence Prevention Program Grant since the Board
had already taken action on this. The motion carried by a unanimous voice vote.
~-3
1
1
1
r
5-10-83 ~ ~ ,2
Supervisor Nickens commented on the memorandum from Mr. D. L. Woodson,
Manager, Regional Landfill, giving the results that 112,960 pounds of litter was
collected on April 16, 1983, Clean Valley Day.
1
1
Supervisor Burton moved that the following Items 4 through 9 under
Citizens Comments and Communications be received and filed:
4. Letter from Senator Paul Trible regarding U. S. Postal Service in
Southwest Roanoke County. I VIII
5. Letter from Congressman Jim Olin regarding Post Office in'S tihwest
County.
Donald R. Flanders informed the Board that a Committee had gone to
Washington D. C. on April 25 to make a presentation requesting the development of
a post office in Southwest County. Senator Paul Trible and Congressman James
Olin received this presentation with enthusiasm and interest. A letter which was
received from Congressman Olin was then read recognizing Mrs. Mabel Smith, Mr.
Charles Lemon, Mr. J. B. Goria, and Mrs. Mary .Thurman for their professional
presentation and efforts to secure a Post Office for Southwest County.
6. Order scheduling hearing for Richmond-On-The-James, Incorporated,
application for a license to broker the transportation of passengers by motor vehicle.
7. Letter from Clerk of House of Delegates enclosing copies of House
Joint Resolutions 136, 98 and 130, and House Resolution 21.
8. Copy oP correspondence from Mr. M. E. Wood, District Engineer,
Highway Department to Mr. David W. Greer regarding improvements in drainage
problems along Brambleton Avenue.
9. Letter from Mr. Bern Ewert, Roanoke City Manager, regarding U.
S. Conference of Mayors. .
Supervisor Burton's motion was carried by a unani~pous voice vote.
Supervisor Nickens recognized the large attendance of citizens from the
Glenvar area and expressed the Board's awareness of their concern regarding the
sale of 8.3 acres of land adjacent to the Fort Lewis Fire Station since this land
presently contains their ballfields.
Supervisor Myers then moved to withdraw from the list of properties to
be offered for sale at public auction on May 21, 1983, parcels numbered
6 ~ ~ 5-10-83
respectively 15-276E (Williamson Road -Old Location) and 30-227 (part) County
Farm Property next to the fire station in Glenvar). Said parcels to be retained as
County surplus property. Supervisor Minter made an amended motion that the Glenvar
property be held as recreational facilities and not be sold until it or other suitable
areas are developed for recreational facilities on a permanent basis.
Mr. James Harvey, 5753 Edgewood Street, Salem, asked for clarification
and exact wording of Supervisor Minter's amended motion. He also requested that
the following people be allowed to speak in opposition to the sale of the property
since they had spent many hours preparing their presentations. Donald R. Flanders
also requested careful wording of the amendment so that it can be properly recorded
in the Minutes. Those speaking were a student, Chris Winter, 7625 Campbell Drive,
who presented a petition containing 1,500 signatures. Mrs. Yvonne Willis, President of
Glenvar Youth Boosters, 2941 Creekwood Drive, Salem, presented a letter addressed
to the Board of Supervisors from Mr. Garry Lautenschlager, President of the Salem
Little League Board of Directors. Mr. David Simmons, Route 1, Box 123, Salem,
relinquished his time to Mr. James Harvey and Mr. Wayland Winstead, 3535 Cherokee
Hills Drive, Salem. Mr. Harvey requested that the property be deeded to Parks and
Recreation or that property be established to take its place.
Mr. David Simmons then requested that the entire motion and the
amendment be read before the vote. Supervisor Minter read the amendment as
follows: That the land in Glenvar be permanently set aside for recreation unless
and until an equivalent or better recreation site is developed in cooperation with
the citizens of the area. The amended motion carried by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Supervisors Myers, Minter, Burton, Nickens.
NAYS: None.
ABSENT: Supervisor Johnson.
LJ
1
~~~
5-10-83' V
The entire motion and amendment was then read by the Deputy Clerk for
clarification as follows: I move to withdraw from the list of properties to be
offered for sale at public auction on May 21, 1983, parcels numbered respectively:
15-276E (Williamson Road -Old Location) and 30-227 (part County Farm Property).
Said parcels to be retained as County surplus property; and that the land in Glenvar
be permanently set aside for recreation unless and until an equivalent or better
recreation site is developed in cooperation with the citizens of the area. The motion
carried by the following roll call vote: ~~~
,i,
AYES: Supervisors Myers, Minter, Burton and Nickens !~~ i ~
';
NAYS: None
ABSENT: .Supervisor Johnson
IN RE: RECESS
Vice Chairman Nickens called for a recess at 8:00 p.m.
IN RE: CALL TO ORDER
At 8:10 p.m. Vice Chairman Nickens called the meeting to order.
IN RE: REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS
Supervisor Myers had no report.
Supervisor Burton presented a request for a raffle permit from the Cave
Spring Knights Booster Club and moved for approval of the permit with waiver of
the $25 fee. The motion carried by a unanimous voice vote.
Supervisor Minter had no report.
Supervisor Nickens read the following resolution recognizing Dr. Noel C.
Taylor on his 22nd anniversary as pastor of~the High Street Baptist Church:
ATTACHMENT C
SALEM. VIRGINIA 24153
Mr. Elmer Hodge
Roanoke County Administrator
3738 Brambleton Avenue, S, W,
Roanoke, VA 24018
°~',~
^ ~~,t,~
~'
Dear Elmer: '
~. c~'~'"
RICHFIELD
NURSING CENTER
Skilled and Intermediate
Nursing Care
P.O. Box 32x0
(703) 380-1500
THE OAKS
Home (ur Aduds
P.O. Box ti01
(703) 3)30-sS00
RICHFIELD
FOUND.VTION
Non-profit Fouttdation
P.O. Box J210
(703) 380-~tS00
KNOI.LIVOOD
Rctirztnent Hottsin¢
3730 Knollrid¢c Rd.
(703)380-1900
RICHFIELD
LAKE ESTATES
Rcttrement Housin¢
P.O. Box 321()
(703)380--1500
RIDGECRF.ST
Apartments (or the Fldcrly
37'10 Knollndee Rd.
(7031380-.th99
THE INN
Dinin¢ and Lounce
3'Ts Knollrid¢e Rd.
(703) 380-~.iSS
May 24, 1988
Richfield is pleased that we can assist Roanoke County
in providing a recreational area for the youth of our valley.
Please feel free to utilize the ball fields each year
until we have a need for that location, at which time, we
will notify you well in advance.
Keep doing the outstanding job, the county is fortunate
to have an administrator with your qualifications and leader-
ship skills.
Best Regards,
jvP
,~~~"""~
H. E. Bowling, Ed.D.
President
DA?'~_~~
REVIEWED BY ~ ~-~~~M'~
ACTION NO.
A-5989-5
r--
ITEM NUMBER
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: May 9, 1989
SUBJECT: Request for funding from the Better Beginnings
Coalition
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: -a~rti~
~` a d -,-y 0 ~~.
°~ ~
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION
The Better Beginnings Coalition of the Roanoke Valley is an
education and advocacy group comprised of approximately 25 area
service organizations. The attached letter from the organization
lists the participating agencies. The mission of the coalition
is to prevent adolescent pregnancy in the Roanoke Valley and to
promote a better outcome for young women who do become pregnant.
The coalition is organizing a one-day strategic planning session
for participating agencies to be held on May 25, 1989 at Hollins
College. They have no funds and have requested the amount of
$500 from the four Roanoke Valley jurisdictions, which would
cover the costs of the session. The cities of Roanoke and Salem
and Botetourt County have already approved the $500 funding
request from the coalition. The funds would cover the consultant
fees, travel expenses, mailing and printing costs, and use of the
facility.
Attached is a letter explaining the plans and a letter of support
from Dr. Molly Hagan, Director of the Alleghany Health District.
FISCAL IMPACT
The organization has requested funds in the amount of $500.
E-~
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors appropriate $500
from the Board Contingency Fund for Roanoke County's share of the
planning session sponsored by the Better Beginnings Coalition.
SUBMITTED BY:
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
ACTION
Approved (X) Motion by: carry c Nick~ns/
Denied ( ) Richard_W. Robert to
Received ( ) _~p~rove
Referred
To
VOTE
No Yes Abs
Garrett x
Johnson _~
McGraw ~$sent
Nickens _~
Robers ~
cc: File
Better Beginnings Coalition
Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance
Dr. Hagan, Director, Health Department
~' ~" ~~ F~ ~~ ~ ~~~ `~ ~' BETTEII BEGINNINGS
An Advocate for Children, A Catalyst for Change
Februar~~ 24, 1989
Participating Organizations
American Red Cross
Association for Retarded Citizens
Catholic Charities of Southwestern
Vircpnia
Child Abuse and Neglect Coordinating
Council
Council of Community Services
City of Salem Schools
Easter Seal Society of Virginia ,Inc.
(BM Corporation
Jobs for Virginia Graduates, Inc.
Junror League of Roanoke, Inc.
March of Dimes
Mental Health Services of the Roanoke
valley
Planned Parenthood of Southwest
Virginia, Inc.
Roanoke Area Ministries
Roanoke Ciry Department of Social
Services
Roanoke Ciry Health Department
Roanoke City Office on Youth
Roanoke Ciry Schools
Roanoke County/Salem Health
Departments
Roanoke County Schools
Roanoke Memorial Hospital OB/GYN
Clinic Inc.
Total Action Against Poverty/Project
Discovery
TRUST
Virginia Cooperative Extension
Service/4-H
Elmer C. Hodge. County Administrator
Roanoke County
P. O. Box 29800
Roanoke. Virginia X4018-0798
Dear Mr. Hodge:
E-`f
In the fall of 1988 an Adolescent Pregnancy Task
Force in Roanoke released a study, Chldren__ Who
Have Children. which described the economic.
educational. and health-related impact of adolescent
pregnancy on our youth and on our community at
large. Statistics from the Virginia Department of
Health (as of June 8, 1988) indicate that Roanoke's
pregnancy rate for girls 14 and younger is more
Lhan twice the state average for the second ~°ear in
a row.
The Better Beginnings Coalition of the Roanoke
Valley is an educational and advocacy- group
comprised of approximately 25 area service
organizations. It was identified big the Adolescent
Pregnancy Task Force as the most appropriate
vehicle for communication and coordination among
the agencies addressing the problem of adolescent
pregnancy. The mission of our coalition is to
prevent adolescent pregnancy in the Roanoke Valley
and to promote a better outcome for young women
who do become pregnant.
In order to develop a comprehensive plan in
response to the problems identified in Children i~ho
Have Children the Better Beginnings Coalition has
decided to organize a one-da~~ strategic planning
session for area agencies and organizations to be
conducted by a professional consultant on May 25,
1989 at Hollins College. The anticipated outcome
would be a plan of action for mobilizing valley-wide
the current relevant programs to achieve a
comprehensive and coordinated approach to the
problems of youths-at-risk for pregnancy. as well as
to the problems of youths who have become
pregnant.
The Better Beginnings Coalition currently has no
funds and so is requesting from four Roanoke Valley
jurisdictions (Botetourt County. Roanoke County.
Salem. and the Citi~ of Roanoke) the amount of X500
each. which would cover the costs of the strategic
planning session (see below).
Ported M Roaroke City OHiu on Yount
~~
STR.4TECIC PLAh',~~ING SESSIOA~ BUDGET
____
__ __
Consul tan is Fee $1000.00
Consultant's Tra ti~el Expenses 600.00
Hollins College ~'scili Ly.'
Equipment Rentals 100.00
Printing Expenses 250.00
Mailing Expenses _ _ .50.00
.... _.........
Tota! Expenses $2000.00
The consultant under consideration is Gary Hollander
(see attached resume), who is in private practice in
Milwaukee. Wisconsin, specializing in strategic
planning and organizational design for sexuality-
related issues. He would be available for pre-
sessivn planning on May 24th and for the conference
on the 25th. It is expected that approximately 30
service organizations would participate in the
conference.
We urge ,vou to consider the seriousness of the
problem of adolescent pregnancy and its devastating
socioeconomic impact on the Roanoke Valley.
Community-wide strategic planning will provide the
necessary initiative for developing a comprehensive,
coordinated. cost-effective approach to this problem
and its prevention.
Please respond to this request for the vitally-
needed X500 by writing to the Better Beginnings
Coalition. P. O. Box 11991. Roanoke. VA. 24022, or
by calling Cheri Har tman, Strategic Planning
Subcommittee. at 985-0151. no later than Friday.
March 10th.
Sincerel,t~ yours.
Winnie lirasnvu~
Chairman
Better Beginnings Coalition
~~ ~~
e
etyma
~n coopera,ion whh the Roanoke County Vinton Health Department
State Department of Health P. 0. Box 307
VINTON, VIRGINIA 241 79
April 24, 1989
Mr. Elmer Hodge
Roanoke County Administrator
P. 0. Box 29800
Roanoke, VA 24018-0798
Dear Elmer:
`~
I would like to encourage you and the Board to consider
supporting the Better Beginnings effort to address teen pregnancy
in the Roanoke Valley. As we have discussed, Roanoke County is
not immune to teen pregnancies.
I am excited that an integrated network is being formed
to study an intervention strategy for this major public health
problem and I will personally be willing to keep you informed of
the plans which emerge from this meeting.
Thank you for your support.
Sincerely,
~ y1~ ~G?
Molly L. Haga M. D., Director
Alleghany He lth District
MLH/mac
Enclosure
ACTION #
ITEM NUMBER /~-
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE:
May 9, 1989
AGENDA ITEM: First Reading of Ordinance Concerning the Issuance
of Not To Exceed $470,000 General Obligation
School Bonds to Finance the Purchase of Equipment
for School Purposes, and the Ordinance Rescinding
Ordinance 41189-10.
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
O
BACKGROUND:
On April 11, 1989 the Board adopted Ordinance 41189-10
authorizing the issuance of not to exceed $440,000 general
obligation school bonds to finance the purchase of equipment for
school purposes. Following the adoption of this ordinance we
were notified by the Virginia Public School Authority (VPSA) that
the amount of this financing should have been $470,000. In order
to meet the bonding requirements we must rescind the original
ordinance, readvertise, and hold a public hearing fo.r the
corrected amount.
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The schools will be using the proceeds of this bond issue to
purchase additional computer equipment for the schools.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The debt will be financed over the next five years. Monies
are included in the 1989-90 budget to cover the debt service for
the year.
E+-i
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the following:
1) That ordinance 41189-10 authorizing the issuance of
$440,000 general obligation school bonds to finance the purchase
of equipment be rescinded following the second reading.
2) That the ordinance authorizing the issuance of
$470,000 general obligation school bonds to finance the purchase
of equipment be adopted following the second reading and public
hearing.
r``.
Diane D. Hyatt Elmer C. Hodge
Director of Finance County Administrator
Approved ( )
Denied ( )
Received ( )
Referred
To
Motion by:
ACTION
Garrett
Johnson
McGraw
Nickens
Robers
VOTE
No Yes Abs
~-i
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA,
HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY .ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON
TUESDAY, MAY 23, 1989
ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF NOT TO EXCEED
$470,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION EQUIPMENT FINANCING BONDS,
ROANOKE COUNTY SERIES 1989, OF THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE,
VIRGINIA, 'TO BE SOLD ~ THE VIRGINIA PUBLIC SCHOOL AUTHORITY
AND SETTING FQRTH THE FORM AND DETAILS THEREOF.
The Board of County Supervisors (the "Board") of the County of
Roanoke, Virginia (the "County") has determined that it is necessary and
expedient to borrow not to exceed $470,000 and to issue its general obligation
equipment financing bonds for the financing of the purchase of equipment for
school purposes.
The County held a public hearing on May 23, 1989 on the issuance of
the Bonds (as defined below) in accordance with the requirements of Sections
15.1-171.1 and 15.1-504, Code of Virginia 1950, as amended.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
SUPERVISORS OF THE OOiJNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA:
1. Authorization of Bonds and Use of Proceeds. The Board of
County Supervisors hereby determines that it is advisable to contract a debt
and issue and sell bonds in the amount of not to exceed $470,000 (the "Bonds")
for the purpose of financing the purchase of certain microcomputer, printer
and peripheral equipment for school purposes (the "Equipment"). The issuance
and sale of the Bonds in the form and upon the terms established pursuant to
this ordinance is hereby authorized.
2.
interest of
Authority
ordinance.
directed to
Sale of the Bonds.
the County to sell th
("VPSA") at par, upon
The appropriate officers
sell the Bonds to VPSA.
It is determined to be in the best
Bonds to the Virginia Public School
the terms established pursuant to this
of the County are hereby authorized and
3. Details of the Bonds. The Bonds shall be issuable in fully
registered form; shall be dated the date of issuance and delivery of the
Bonds; shall be designated "County of Roanoke General Obligation Equipment
Financing Bonds, Roanoke County Series 1989"; shall bear interest payable
semi-annually on June 1 and December 1 (each an "Interest Payment Date"),
beginning December 1, 1989, at the rates established in accordance with
paragraph 4 of this ordinance; and the principal amount of the Bonds shall be
payable in annual installments on the dates (each a "Principal Payment Date")
and in the amounts established in accordance with paragraph 4 of this
ordinance. The Bonds shall be issued as a single, typewritten bond
substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A.
~-- i
4. Interest Rates; Principal Installments. (a) The Admini-
strator of the County is hereby authorized and directed to accept the interest
rate or rates on the Bonds determined by VPSA by competitive bid, provided
that no such interest rate or rates shall exceed nine percent (9$) per annum,
and the execution and delivery of the Bonds as described in Section 6 hereof
shall conclusively evidence the same as having been approved and authorized by
this ordinance.
(b) The principal amount of the Bonds shall be payable in five (5)
annual instalments of not to exceed $94,000 each, the first of which shall be
due DecP~nber 1, 1989, and the remaining installments annually thereafter.
5. Payment; Paying Agent and Registrar. The Treasurer of the
County is hereby designated as Bond Registrar and Paying Agent for the Bonds
and the following provisions shall apply:
(a) all payments of principal of and interest on the Bonds shall be
made in immediately available funds to VPSA at or before 11:00 a.m. on the
applicable Interest Payment Date and Principal Payment Date, or if such date
is not a business date for Virginia banks or for the Commonwealth of Virginia,
then at or before 11:00 a.m. on the business day preceding such Interest Pay-
ment Date and Principal Payment Date; and
(b) all overdue payments of principal or interest shall bear
interest at the applicable interest rate or rates on the Bonds.
6. Execution of the Bonds. The Chairman or Vice Chairman and
the Clerk or any Deputy Clerk of the Board are authorized and directed to
execute and deliver the Bonds in an aggregate principal amount of $470,000 and
to affix the seal of the County hereto.
7. Full Faith and Credit. The full faith and credit of the
County are hereby irrevocably pledged for the payment of principal of and
interest on the Bonds as the same become due and payable. There shall be
levied and collected annually on all locally taxable property in the County an
ad valorem tax sufficient to pay such principal and interest as the same
respectively become due and payable.
8. School Board Approval. The Clerk of the Board is hereby
authorized and directed to cause a certified copy of this ordinance to be
presented to the School Board of the County. The Bonds hereby authorized
shall not be issued by the Board until the School Board of the County shall
have adopted an appropriate resolution consenting to the issuance of the
Bonds.
9. Non-arbitrage Certificate and Tax Covenants. The
appropriate officers and agents of the County are hereby authorized and
directed to execute a Non-Arbitrage Certificate and Tax Covenants setting
forth the expected use and investment of the proceeds of the Bonds and
containing such covenants as may be necessary in order to show compliance with
the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"),
and applicable regulations relating to the exclusion from gross income of
interest on the Bonds or on the VPSA Bonds. The Board covenants on behalf of
~+-i
the County that the proceeds from the issuance and sale of the Bonds will be
invested and expended as set forth in such Non-Arbitrage Certificate and Tax
Covenants and that the County shall comply with the other covenants and repre-
sentations contained therein. Furthermore, the Board covenants on behalf of
the County that the County shall comply with the provisions of the Code so
that interest on the Bonds and on the VPSA Bonds will remain excludable from
gross income for Federal income tax purposes.
10. Use of Bond Proceeds. The Board hereby appropriates and
directs that, simultaneously with the sale of the Bonds to VPSA, the Treasurer
shall apply, or cause to be applied, (a) the difference between the principal
amount of the Bonds and the cost of the Equipment to VPSA to defray the cost
of issuing the Bonds and (b) the remainder of the proceeds from the sale of
the Bonds, representing the cost of the Equi~xnent, to VPSA for the purchase of
the Equipment.
11. Filing of Ordinance and Publication of Notice. The appro-
priate officers or agents of the County are hereby authorized and directed to
cause a certified copy of this ordinance to be filed with the Circuit Court of
the County and, within ten (10) days thereafter, to cause to be published once
in a newspaper having general circulation in the County a notice setting
setting forth (a) in brief and general terms the purposes for which the Bonds
are to be issued and (b) the amount of the Bonds.
12. Further Actions. Each member of the Board and all other
officers, employees and agents of the County are hereby authorized to take
such action as they or any one of them may consider necessary or desirable in
connection with the issuance and sale of the Bonds and any such action
previously taken is hereby ratified and confirmed.
13. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect imme-
diately.
The undersigned Clerk of the Board of County Supervisors of the
County of Roanoke, Virginia, hereby certifies that the foregoing constitutes a
true and correct extract from the minutes of a meeting of the Board of County
Supervisors held on May 9 and May 23, 1989 and of the whole thereof so far as
applicable to the matters referred to in such extract. I hereby further
certify that such meeting was a regularly scheduled meeting and that, during
the consideration of the foregoing ordinance, a quorum was present.
WITNESS MY HAND and the seal of the Board of County Supervisors of
the County of Roanoke, Virginia.
Dated: May 23, 1989
Deputy Clerk, Board of
County Supervisors of the
County of Roanoke, Virginia
~-i
EXHIBIT A
(FORM OF BOND)
No. R-1
IINITED STATES OF AMERICA
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
$470,000
COIINTY OF ROANORE
General Obligation Equipment Financing Bond
Roanoke County Series 1989
The COIINTY OF ROANORE, VIRGINIA (the "County"), for value re-
ceived, hereby acknowledges itself indebted and promises to pay to
the VIRGINIA PIIBLIC SCHOOL AIITHORITY the principal amount of FOIIR
HIINDRED FORTY THOIISAND DOLLARS, in installments, commencing
December 1, 1989, and annually thereafter on December 1 of each
year (each a "Principal Payment Date"), as shown on Schedule 1
attached hereto, together with interest on the unpaid installments
at the annual rates set forth on Schedule 1 attached hereto, from
the date of this Bond until payment of the principal sum hereof,
such interest to be payable commencing on December 1, 1989, and
semi-annually thereafter on June 1 and December 1 of each year
(each an "Interest Payment Date"; together with any Principal Pay-
went Date, a "Payment Date"), as shown on Schedule 1 attached
hereto. Both principal of and interest on this Bond are payable
in lawful money of the United States of America.
i.~ ~ ~
The Treasurer of the County shall make all payments of prin-
cipal of and interest on this Bond, without the presentation or
surrender hereof, to the registered owner hereof, in immediately
available funds at or before 11:00 a.m. on the applicable Payment
Date. If a Payment Date is not a business day for banks in the
Commonwealth of Virginia or for the Commonwealth of Virginia, then
the payment of principal of or interest on this Bond shall be made
in immediately available funds at or before 11:00 a.m. on the
business day next preceding the scheduled Payment Date. Upon rec-
eipt by the registered owner of this Bond of said payments of
principal and interest, written acknowledgment of the receipt
thereof shall be given promptly to the Treasurer of the County,
and the County shall be fully discharged of its obligation on this
Bond to the extent of the payment so made. Upon final payment,
this Bond shall be surrendered to the Treasurer of the County for
cancellation.
The full faith and credit of the County are irrevocably
pledged for the payment of principal of and interest on this Bond.
This Bond is duly authorized and issued in compliance with
and pursuant to the Constitution and laws of the Commonwealth of
Virginia, including the Public Finance Act, Chapter 5, Title 15.1,
Code of Virginia 1950, as amended, and an ordinance and a
resolution duly adopted by the Board of County Supervisors of the
County and the School Board of the County, respectively, to
A-2
~+-i
provide funds to finance the purchase of equipment for school
purposes.
This Bond is registered in the name of Virginia Public School
Authority as to both principal and interest on books of the County
kept by the Treasurer of the County.
The principal installments on this Bond are not subject to
redemption prior to their respective payment dates.
All acts, conditions and things required by the Constitution
and laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia to happen, exist or be
performed precedent to and in the issuance of this Bond have hap-
pened, exist and have been performed in due time, form and manner
as so required, and this Bond, together with all other
indebtedness of the County, is within every debt and other limit
prescribed by the Constitution and laws of the Commonwealth of
Virginia, and provision has been made for the levy and collection
of an annual tax upon all taxable property in the County subject
to local taxation sufficient to provide for the payment of the
principal of and interest on this Bond as the same shall become
due.'
A-3
I~~ }
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Supervisors of the
County of Roanoke has caused this Bond to be issued in the name of
the County of Roanoke, Virginia, to be signed by its Chairman or
Vice-Chairman, its seal to be affixed hereto and attested by the
signature of its Clerk or any of its Deputy Clerks, and this Bond
to be dated July _, 1989.
(SEAL)
ATTEST:
COIINTY OF ROANORE,
VIRGINIA
By
Clerk, Board of County Chairman, Board of County
Supervisors of the County Supervisors of the County
of Roanoke, Virginia of Roanoke, Virginia
A-4
"` `
SCHEDULE 1
Principal
Payment Interest Interest Installment Total
Dates Rate Due Due Due
December 1, 1989 ~ $ $ $
June 1, 1990
December 1, 1990
June 1, 1991
December 1, 1991
June 1, 1992
December 1, 1992
June 1, 1993
December 1, 1993
~~~ i
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, MAY 9, 1989
ORDINANCE REPEALING AND RESCINDING ORDIN-
ANCE 41189-10 WHICH AUTHORIZED THE ISSU-
ANCE OF $440,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION
SCHOOL BONDS TO FINANCE THE PURCHASE OF
EQUIPMENT
WHEREAS, on April 11, 1989, the Board of Supervisors of
Roanoke County, Virginia, adopted an ordinance authorizing the
issuance of not to exceed $440,000 general obligation school
bonds to finance the purchase of certain equipment, said bonds to
be sold to the Virginia Public School Authority (VPSA); and
WHEREAS, VPSA has notified the County that the amount
of this borrowing should be $470,000; and
WHEREAS, it is necessary to correct this action by the
adoption of an ordinance with the corrected amount, and by repeal-
ing the .previous ordinance; and
WHEREAS, the first reading of this repealing ordinance
was held on May 9, 1989; the second reading was held on May 23,
1989.
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That Ordinance 41189-10 adopted on April 11, 1989,
Roanoke County, Virginia, which authorized the issuance of not to
exceed $440,000 general obligation school bonds to finance the
purchase of certain equipment, said bonds to be sold to the Vir-
ginia Public School Authority (VPSA) is hereby repealed and
rescinded.
2. That this ordinance shall take effect immediately.
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, MAY 9, 1989
ORDINANCE REPEALING AND RESCINDING ORDIN-
ANCE 41189-10 WHICH AUTHORIZED THE ISSU-
ANCE OF $440,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION
SCHOOL BONDS TO FINANCE THE PURCHASE OF
EQUIPMENT
WHEREAS, on April 11, 1989, the Board of Supervisors of
Roanoke County, Virginia, adopted an ordinance authorizing the
issuance of not to exceed $440,000 general obligation school
bonds to finance the purchase of certain equipment, said bonds to
be sold to the Virginia Public School Authority (VPSA); and
WHEREAS, VPSA has notified the County that the amount
of this borrowing should be $470,000; and
WHEREAS, it is necessary to correct this action by the
adoption of an ordinance with the corrected amount, and by repeal-
ing the previous ordinance; and
WHEREAS, the first reading of this repealing ordinance
was held on May 9, 1989; the second reading was held on May 23,
1989.
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That Ordinance 41189-10 adopted on April 11, 1989,
Roanoke County, Virginia, which authorized the issuance of not to
exceed $440,000 general obligation school bonds to finance the
purchase of certain equipment, said bonds to be sold to the Vir-
ginia Public School Authority (VPSA) is hereby repealed and
rescinded.
2. That this ordinance shall take effect immediately.
ACTION #
ITEM NUMBER
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE CCZUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: May 9, 1989
AGENDA ITEM: Fiscal Year 1989-90 Budget Appropriation Ordinance
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
~..wg~-.~+/~ vim] %~~y/' /~~~GR~'~~
BACKGROUND:
The 1989-90 fiscal year budget was presented to the Board of
Supervisors by the County Administrator on April 11, 1989.
Budget public hearings were held on January 24, 1989 and April
11, 1989 to receive written and oral comment from the public con-
cerning the proposed annual budget. The budget was adopted with
the following changes on April 25, 1989:
$819,905 in bond proceeds was removed from the
School Capital Improvements Fund.
School Bus Fund was reduced by $200,000.
$100,000 was transferred from the Water Offsite
Facilities Fund to the Capital Fund for Economic
Development.
Total interfund transfers was reduced by $10,000.
$143,918 in bond proceeds was removed from the
School Capital Improvements Fund.
The amount of the anticipated VPSA borrowing was
reduced by $130,000.
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
Attached for your approval is the 1989-90 fiscal year Budget
Appropriation Ordinance. The total County Budget is $148,760,413.
This includes all interfund transfers. The budget net of inter-
fund transfers is $111,365,879.
µ-a,
ALTERNATIVES AND IMPACTS:
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
The first reading of the appropriation ordinance will be
held on May 9, 1989. The second reading will be held on May 23,
1989. Staff recommends approval of the first and second readings
and adoption of the 1989-90 fiscal year Budget Appropriation
Ordinance after the second reading on May 23, 1989.
Respectfully submitted,
Reta R. Busher
Director of Management
and Budget
Approved
Denied
Received
Referred
To
Motion by:
ACTION
Elmer C. Hodg
County Administrator
Garrett
Johnson
McGraw
Nickens
Robers
VOTE
No Yes Abs
~}-2.
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, May 9, 1989
ORDINANCE APPROPRIATING FUNDS FOR THE
1989-90 FISCAL YEAR BUDGET FOR
ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA
WHEREAS, upon notice duly published in the newspaper, a public hearing
was held on April 11, 1989, concerning the adoption of the annual budget for
Roanoke County for fiscal year 1989-90; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, approved
said budget on April 25, 1989, pursuant to the provisions of Section 13.02 of
the Roanoke County Charter and Chapter 4 of Title 15.1 of the 1950 Code of
Virginia, as amended; and
WHEREAS, the first reading of this appropriation ordinance was held on
May 9, 1989, and the second reading of this ordinance was held on May 23,
1989, pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County
Charter.
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia,
as follows:
1. That the following appropriations are hereby made from the respective
funds for the period beginning July 1, 1989, and ending June 30, 1990, for the
functions and purposes indicated:
I~-~
COUNTI OF ROANOLB, VIRGINIA
PROPOSED FISCAL MBAR 1989-90 BUDGBi
Nei 9, 1989
- ---------------------------
PBRSONNBL OPBRATING
-------------------------- ------------------------
CAPITAL TRANSFBRS
------------------------ ---------
TOTAL
-----------
BtPBNDITURBS:
GBNBRAL FUND
BOARD OF SUPBRVISORS
=99,108
11,523
500
5111,131
CO ADMINISTRATOR
ADMINISTRATION 134,111 15,616 150,333
INFORMATION 1 RBFBRRAL 31,611 44,058 81,135
BDMAN RBSOURCBS
ADMINISTRATION 161,531 44,011 1,025 206,573
BNPLOYBB ABLATIONS 29,396 29,396
COONTY ATTORNBY 192,664 26,620 4,200 (37,143) 186,341
BCONOMIC DBVBLOPMBNT
ADMINISTRATION 120,255 113,356 233,611
NAR[BTING 23,500 23,500
TRBASURBR 286,311 117,611 5,680 34,625 504,227
COMMONifBALTB ATTORNBY 294,019 18,200 312,279
YICTIMIMITNBSS 6,670 6,670
COMMISSIONBR OF TBB RBYBNUB
ADMINISTRATION 57,166 4,600 62,366
RBAL BSTATB 11,998 13,329 85,327
PBRSONAL PROPBRTY 175,167 74,198 5,600 254,965 _
BUSINESS LICBNSB 96,683 14,372 111,055
CLBRI OF TBB CIRCUIT COURT
POBLIC RBCORDS 343,663 91,680 3,132 438,475
MICROFILM 39,131 38,441 18,178
POLICING AND INVBSTIGATING
ADMINISTRATION 170,819 49,900 220,519
CIVIL DIVISION 575,348 54,150 629,498
OVIFORM DIVISION 1,316,503 248,698 180,099 1,745,280
CRIMINAL INVEST DIVISION 549,677 80,623 10,934 641,234
SBRYICBS DIVISION 840,814 105,343 9,633 955,190
TRANSPORTATION SAFBTY COMMISSION 960 960
CARB f CONFINBMBNi OF PRISONERS 1,696,962 319,162 2,016,724
CIRCUIT COURT 1,350 93,614 100,964
GBNBRAL DISTRICT COORT 300 16,160 1,680 18,140
NAGISTRATB 130 130
J i D RBLATIONS COURT 9,221 1,915 11,136
PROBATION 44,115 44,IT5
eSST COUNTY ADNIN-MGT SBRVICBS 62,296 7,325 69,621
COONTY ASSESSOR
ADMINISTRATION
193,226
60,914
115
254,315
RBASSBSSMBNi 310,630 34,935 6,203 351,768
1~7
PERSONNEL OPERATING CAPITAL TRANSFBRS
----------- TOTAL
-----------
BOARD OF BQOILIZATION --------------
10,165 ------------ ------------- 10,165
FINANCIAL PLANNING
CBNTRAL ACCOUNTING 192,878 91,411 15,431 299,180
PAIROLL 53,449 14,990 115 68,614
PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION 60,000 5,400 65,400
NANAGBNBNT IND BUDGBT 18,102 44,534 122,636
RIS[ NANAGBNEIfT 10,034 1,060,284 1,130,318
PROCURBNBNT SERYICBS 118,083 39,996 195 218,214
FIRE
ADMINISTRATION
11,436
27,125
13,500
112,661
FIRB SUPPRBSSION 836,531 282,538 55,600 168,186 1,343,461
FIRB PRBYENTION 95,004 8,300 3,300 106,604
TRAINING 31,950 39,605 8,200 19,755
_
TBCHNICAL SBRVICBS 58,956 149,086 1,170 209,812
PLANNING AND RBSBARCH 36,496 2,455 38,931
RBSCUB SQUAD
OPBRATIONS 169,018 45,510 214,648
BNS SBRVICBS 198,466 9,015 207,541
BNBRGBNCY SBRVICBS
PLANNING AND OPBRATIONS 23,695 7,300 30,995
HAZARDOUS NATBRIALS 10,620 10,620
ASST CO ADNIN-COMMUNITY SYCS 101,113 18,500 (10,800) 108,873
GBNBRAL SBRVICBS 181,152 24,318 2,800 208,810
SOLID NASTB 826,1!5 663,008 90,596 1,599,749
ENGIHBERINC
BNGINBBRING 214,565 16,757 11,460 (97,584 145,198
DRAFTING l'RBCORDS 95,771 10,264 500 (39,758 66,783
CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION 110,971 9,364 15,000 (57,130) 71,605
DRAINAGE 46,256 43,744 110,000 200,000
ROADNAY 35,630 4,700 40,330
STRBBT LIGHTING 98,441 96,441
BUILDING NAINTBNANCB 245,401 524,743 46,060 816,204
PLANNING A ZONING
ADMINISTRATION 233,075 39,528 1,900 294,503
ZONING ORDINANCE fl,900 8,900
PLANNING COMMISSION 15,995 2,100 18,695
DBYELOPNBNT REVIBN
PBRMITS 83,134 2,085 85,219
DBVELOPNBNT RBYIBN 41,983 1,400 49,383
CONSTRUCTION BUILDING SBRVICBS
ADMINISTRATION 40,168 9,000 41,168
INSPBCTIONS 112,261 23,413 20,000 215,674
ASST CO ADMIN-HUNAN SBRYICBS 88,504 9,111 91+615
GROUNDS NAINTBNANCB
GROUNDS NAINTBNANCB 620,987 208,599 33,550 863,136
LBAF COLLBCTION 26,150 26,150
STRBBT SIGNS 4,200 4,200
PARS AND RBCREATION
CONMONITY EDUCATION 92,949 1,000 93+941
LBISURE ACTIYITIBS 95,360 1,000 96,360
OUTDOOR ADVBNTURB 33,163 376 33,539
SENIOR CITIZENS 80,601 3,100 83,101
SPECIAL BYBNTS 48,900 3,400 52,300
~~~
-------------
PBRSONNBL ------------
OPBRATING ------------
CAPITAL
--- -------------
TRANSFBRS
-------------- -----------
TOTAL
-----------
lflBR-PBUTICS -------------
19,653 ------------
19,880 -------- 91,533
ADULT ATHLBTICS 59,133 4,000 63,133
iOUTfl ATHLBTICS 140,916 10,000 150,976
ADMINISTRATION 208,590 89,952 14,431 _ 312,979
PUBLIC flBALTfl 412,599 412,599
SOCIAL SBRYICBS ADMINISTRATION 1,601,901 226,823 4,040 1,832,110
PUBLIC ASSISTAICB 954,030 954,030
INSTITUTIONAL CARB 36,000 36,000
SOCIAL SBRVICB ORGANIZATIONS 94,984 94,984
CONTRIBUTIONS SYC ORGANIZATIONS 30,000 30,000
LIBRARY
ADMINISTRATION 108,612 650 109,262
RBSBARCH AND CIRCULATION 661,283 265,485 926,768
GBNBRAL MAINTBNANCB 62,900 62,900
JOINT BOTBTOURT/R[B CNTY LIB 21,816 24,153 125 46,694
BZTBNSION 1 CONTINUING BDUCATION 87,524 17,190 104,694
BLBCTIONS
RBGISTRATIUN 92,931 26,899 ~ 119,830
BLBCTIONS 28,357 12,175 40,532
ANIMAL CONTROL 107,689 42,355 14,000 164,044
BMPLOYBB BBNHFITS 594,298 594,298
CONSOLIDATION 200,000 200,000
MISCBLLANBOUS 811,349 811,349
TRANS TO DBBT-GBNBRAL 3,746,121 3,746,121
TRANS TO DBBT SBRVICB-SCHOOL 1,646,5?5 1,646,575
TRANS TO CAPITAL 901,443 901,443
TRANS TO SCHOOLS 28,637,950 28,637,950
!BANS TO GARAGB II 120,000 120,000
TRANS TO YOUTH HAVBN II 78,658 18,658
TRANS TO INTBRNAL SBRVICB 305,832 305,832
TRANS TO UTILITY CAPITAL 40,000 40,000
CONTINGBNT BALANCB 50,000 50,000
SUB-TOTAL GBNBRAL FUND :62,353,648
DBBT SBRVICB FUND
CAPITAL FUND
YOUTH HAVBN II FDND
6,601,879
1,051,443
235,921 71,816 1,000
6,607,879
1,051,!43
308,143
RBCRBATION FBB CLASS FUND
COMMUNITY BDUCATION 15,181 6,189 2,250 24,220
LBISORB ACTIYITIBS 13,502 26,820 1,700 42,022
OUTDOOR ADVBNTURB 4,300 23,905 1,150 29,955
SBNIOR CITIZBNS 7,491 19,148 2,000 29,239
SPBCIAL BVBNTS ~ 5,376 50,635 3,000 59,011
THBRAPBUTICS 4,300 4,300 100 9,300
/DOLT ATHLBTICS 39,820 12,840 1,000 53,660
YOUTH ATHLBTICS 995 915
TT '~
PBRSONNBL OPBRATING CAPITAL iRANSFBRS TOTAL
ADNINISTRATI01 4,961 , 5,191 1,000 11,164
INTBRNAL SBRVICBS FUND
NANAGBNBNT INFORdATION STSTBNS
ADMINISTRATION 100,363 13,250 1,300
- 114,913
OPBRATIONS 151,591 140,341 39,200 105,284 442,428
DBVBLOPMBNT 211,543 1,850 100 220,093
COMMUNICATIONS 194,288 96,812 2,000 213,100
UTILITY FUND
UTILITY BILLING
COLLBCTIONS ~ 90,359 99,180 2,000 190,139
NBTBR RBADING 52,641 8,879 11,100 12,626
OTILITT
ADMINISTRATION 189,321 50,626 23,410 263,363
fiATBR OPBRATIONS 368,532 1,441,420 15,000 1,830,952
YATBR MAINTBNANCB 218,091 323,485 167,230 108,806
SBNBR OPBRATIONS 93,443 905,590 999,033
SBNBR MAINTBNANCB 244,629 139,519 18,311 402,525
SANITARY SBffBR BVALUATION 272,412 140,150 154,845 568,007
NON-DBPARTMBNTAL-NATBR 1,344,959 162,494 1,507,453
NON-DBPARTMBNTAL-SBflBR 1,391,202 201,897 1,593,099
OFFSITB FACILIYIBS FUND-fiATBR 189,529 189,529
OFFSITB FACILIYIBS FUND-SBYBR 195,144 195,144
GARAGB II FUND 233,700 .233,900
SUB-TOTAL GBNBRAL COUNTY FUNDS 580,386,569
SCHOOL OPBRATING FUND :58,048,697
SCHOOL BOS FUND 1,000,000
SCHOOL CAFBTBRIA FUND 2,102,000
SCfl00L FBDBRAL PROGRAMS FUND 1,486,214
SCHOOL CAPITAL IMPROVBMBNTS FUND - 217,900
SCHOOL VPSA LOAN FUND 1988 ISSIIB 2,500,000
SCHOOL VPSI LOAN FUND 1989 ISSUB 1,115,000
SCHOOL TBZTHOOL FUND 419,033
RBGIONAL SPBCIAL BDUCATION FUND 825,000
SUB-TOTAL SCHOOL FUNDS =68,373,844
TOTAL BIPBNDITURBS ALL FUNDS :148,760,113
"'"
RBVBNDBS:
GBNBRAL FUND
DBBT FUND
CAPITAL FUND
YOOTH HAVBN II FUND
RBCRBATION FBB CLASS FOND
INTBRNAL SBRYICBS FUND
UTILITY FDND
OFFSITB FACILITY FUND-yATBR
OFFSITB FACILITY FUND-SBifBR
GARAGB II FUND
SUB-TOTAL GBNBRAL COUNTY FUNDS
SCHOOL OPBRATING FDND
SCHOOL BUS FUND
SCHOOL CAFBTBRIA FUND
SCHOOL FBDBRAL PROGRAMS FUND
SCHOOL CAPITAL INPROYBNBNTS FUND
SCHOOL VPSA LOAN FUND 1988 ISSUB.
SCHOOL YPSA LOAN FUND 1989 ISSUB
SCHOOL TB%TBOOB FUND
RBGIONAL SPBCIAL BDUCATION FUND
SUB-TOTAL SCHOOL FUNDS
TOTAL RBVBNUBS ALL FUNDS
:62,353,648
6,607,879
1,051,443
308,743
259,946
1,050,534
8,136,003
184,529
195,144
233,700
80,386,569
58,048,697
1,000,000
2,702,000
1,486,214
217,900
2,500,000
1,115,000
419,033
825,000
68,373,844
=148,160,413
-~
2. That the County Administrator may authorize the transfer of any
unencumbered balance or portion thereof from one classification of expenditure
to another within the same department or agency. That the County
Administrator may transfer up to $10,000 from the unencumbered balance of the
appropriation of one department or agency to another department or agency,
including the contingency account encompassed in the Non-Departmental
appropriation.
3. That all funded outstanding encumbrances, both operating and capital,
at June 30, 1989, are reappropriated to the 1989-90 fiscal year to the same
department and account for which they are encumbered in the previous year.
4. That appropriations designated for capital projects will not lappe at
the end of the fiscal year but shall remain appropriated until the completion
of the project or until the Board of Supervisors, by appropriate action,
changes or eliminates the appropriation. Upon completion of a capital
project, staff is authorized to close out the project and transfer to the
funding source any .remaining balances. This section applies to appropriations
for Capital Projects at June 30, 1989, and appropriations in the 1989-90
budget.
5. That all school fund appropriations remaining at the end of the
1989-90 fiscal year not lapse but shall be appropriated to the School Capital
Improvements Fund in fiscal year 1990-91.
. ,~w. M
~~ ~'
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, MAY 9, 1989
ORDINANCE 5989-6 AUTHORIZING THE DONATION
OF PARCEL 1, PART TRACT 3, C. L. BUSH
ESTATES, CONSISTING OF .98 ACRE TO THE
TOWN OF VINTON
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.01 of
the Charter of Roanoke County the subject property has been de-
Glared to be surplus and is being made available for other public
uses, i.e. public outdoor recreation; and
2. That, pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04
of the Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading concerning the
donation and disposition of the hereinafter-described real estate
was held on April 25, 1989; a second reading was held on May 9,
1989; and
3. That this real estate is more particularly des-
cribed as Parcel 1, Part Tract 3, C. L. Bush Estate containing
.98 acre and designated as Roanoke County Tax Map No. 61.14-4-
4.2; and
4. That the County donates the .98-acre tract of land
to the Town of Vinton subject to the provisions and restrictions
of the Land and Water Conservation Fund Act and in particular
Section 6F; and
5. That the County hereby reserves a twenty (20) foot
public water line easement across the .98-acre tract of land to
access the adjacent well lot; and
6. That the donation of the property to the Town of
Vinton is hereby authorized; and
7. That the County Administrator is authorized to exe-
cute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke
County as are necessary to accomplish the conveyance of said pro-
perty, all of which shall be upon form approved by the County
Attorney.
On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor
Robers and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, Garrett, Nickens
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Supervisor McGraw
A COPY TESTE:
/~
Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Paul Mahoney, County Attorney
John Willey, Director, Real Estate Assessment
Cliff Craig, Director, Utilities
Vinton Town Council
2
ACTION ~~
ITEM NUMBER ~~'
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: May 9, 1989
AGENDA. ITEM:
Ordinance authorizing the donation of Parcel 1,
Part Tract 3, C. L. Bush Estate containing .98
acre to the Town of Vinton
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The County acquired Parcel 1, Part Tract 3, C. L. Bush
Estate consisting of .98 acre (Roanoke County Tax Map No. 61.14-4-
4.2) by deed dated August 19, 1981, from the T. Martin Bush
Estate. The property was purchased by the County with Commission
of Outdoor Recreation grant monies to be developed as part of the
Stonebridge Park site. This tract was never utilized or devel-
oped as part of the park. All recipients of this grant fall
under the provisions of the Land and Water Conservation Fund Act,
specifically Section 6F which states:
No property acquired or developed with assistance under
this section shall, without the approval of the Secre-
tary of the Interior, be converted to other than public
outdoor recreation uses. The Secretary shall approve
such conversion only if he finds it to be in accord
with the then existing comprehensive statewide outdoor
recreation plan, and only upon such conditions as he
deems necessary to assure the substitution of other
recreation properties of at least equal fair market
value and of reasonably equivalent usefulness and loca-
tion.
The County wishes to donate the .98-acre tract of land to
the Town of Vinton subject to the provisions and restrictions of
the Land and Water Conservation Fund Act and in particular Sec-
tion 6F. In addition, the Utilities Department has requested
that a twenty (20) foot wide public water line easement be re-
served across this property to access the adjacent well lot.
Section 18.04 of the County Charter requires that the dispo-
sition of public property be accomplished by ordinance. The
first reading of the proposed ordinance was held on April 25,
1989; the second reading was held on May 9, 1989.
~~
FISCAL IMPACTS:
None.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff makes the following recommendations:
1. That the Board of Supervisors reaffirm that this parcel
of land is surplus and available for other public uses.
2. That the Board of Supervisors favorably consider the
adoption of the proposed ordinance.
3. That the County Administrator be authorized to execute
such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County
as are necessary to accomplish the conveyance of said property.
Respectfully submitted,
Sarah A. Rice
Assistant County Attorney
----------------- VOTE
-------------- ACTION
No Yes Abs
Approved ( ) Motion by: Garrett
Denied ~ ) Johnson
Received ( ) McGraw _.
Referred Nickens
To Robers ._
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, MAY 9, 1989
ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE DONATION OF
PARCEL 1, PART TRACT 3, C. L. BUSH
ESTATES, CONSISTING OF .98 ACRE TO THE
TOWN OF VINTON
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.01 of
the Charter of Roanoke County the subject property has been de-
clared to be surplus and is being made available for other public
uses, i.e. public outdoor recreation; and
2. That, pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04
of the Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading concerning the
donation and disposition of the hereinafter-described real estate
was held on April 25, 1989; a second reading was held on May 9,
1989; and
3. That this real estate is more particularly des-
cribed as Parcel 1, Part Tract 3, C. L. Bush Estate containing
.98 acre and designated as Roanoke County Tax Map No. 61.14-4-
4.2; and
4. That the County donates the .98-acre tract of land
to the Town of Vinton subject to the provisions and restrictions
of the Land and Water Conservation Fund Act and in particular
Section 6F; and
5. That the County hereby reserves a twenty (20) foot
public water line easement across the .98-acre tract of land to
access the adjacent well lot; and
• ~"'"
6. That the donation of the property to the Town of
Vinton is hereby authorized; and
7. That the County Administrator is authorized to exe-
cute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke
County as are necessary to accomplish the conveyance of said pro-
perty, all of which shall be upon form approved by the County
Attorney.
,~
"_ °~
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, MAY 9, 1989
ORDINANCE 5989-7 ACCEPTING AN OFFER FOR
AND AUTHORIZING THE SALE OF 1.4 ACRES,
MORE OR LESS, IN THE SOUTHWEST INDUSTRIAL
PARK
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.01 of
the Charter of Roanoke County, the subject property has been de-
Glared to be surplus and is being made available for other public
uses, i.e. economic development; and
2. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of
the Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading was held on April
25, 1989; and a second reading was held on May 9, 1989, concern-
ing the sale and disposition of 1.4 acres, more or less, in the
Southwest Industrial Park; and
3. That offers having been received for said property,
the offer of Gorman Howell to purchase 1.4 acres, more or less,
for $35,500 is hereby accepted and all other offers are rejected;
and
4. That all proceeds from the sale of this real estate
are to be allocated to the capital reserves of the County; and
5. That the County Administrator is authorized to exe-
cute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke
County as are necessary to accomplish the conveyance of said pro-
perty, all of which shall be upon form approved by the County
Attorney.
On motion of Supervisor Robers, seconded by Supervisor
Nickens and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Supervisor McGraw
A COPY TESTE:
Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Paul Mahoney, County Attorney
John Willey, Director, Real Estate Assessment
Tim Gubala, Director, Economic Development
Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance
2
~Z -'
SOUTHWEST INDUSTRIAL PARK
PAY BACK SCHEDULE
TAX BALANCE ON
TAX YEAR GENERATED INVESTMENT
1988 & 89 $52,355 <135,645>
1990 $35,179 <100,466>
1991 $37,525 <62,941>
1992 $39,645 <23,296>
1993 $40,313 $17,017
INITIAL INVESTMENT WAS $188,000
PAY BACK PERIOD OF FIVE AND ONE HALF YEARS
ACTION #
ITEM NUMBER
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: May 9, 1989
AGENDA ITEM: Sale of 1.4+ acres in the Southwest Industrial Park
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
BACKGROUND:
Mr. Gorman Howell has made an offer to purchase 1.4+ acres in the
Southwest Industrial Park. Because of the large number of
easements (note attached map), the property is being sold for
$35,500. Mr. Howell plans to build a 10,000 square foot
facility.
IMPACT:
Mr. Howell is paying all surveying costs associated with the sale
of said property. Annual tax revenue is estimated to be $3,100.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the following action:
The first reading was held on April 25, 1989 and upon the second
reading to be held this date, May 9, 1989, staff recommends
approval of the sale of 1.4+ acres to purchaser and authorization
by the County Administrator to execute all necessary documents
upon approval by the County Attorney.
SUBMITTED BY:
~,-- C1l`
~ ~'l~t%
Timothy W. Guba a
Director, Economic Development
APPROVED BY:
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
ACTION VOTE
Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs
Denied ( ) Garrett
Received ( ) Johnson
Referred McGraw
To Nickens
Robers
Attachment
SOUTHWEST INDUSTRIAL PARK
\ l ' I I 1 I I I (
20 ~\\ \ ~Ow 21 I ZL I 23 I 24 I 26 I Z~ I 2'1 I 2a I
I A1..ocK I "A" "N AnoW~pR1L 5u1pnIJ141or~' I
`\ \ ~\ ~\` I t~rS. 6 P >31
\ \ I I I' ~ I ~ ~ ~
~\ \ ` `~ x.11.14! 21= 2v" E.•~ '~ 9 4.l 1' (ToTA~) 9 I I I
3-34 -T 200.00•
W ~
II Q ~N ~ 'y~ TAx~s7.14-3-1.3
aG. 'a 8 ,~ . T2ACT III- f'S
of ~ •• ~ \.~~,
~CIATif ~, ~ , } ~ \ SOLD
rA-~ ~ ~
12/b / •.
i= ~~~J
~~/j~- -1 ~ LYC~~ A54M~N
13.2' ~ 1
d. .g ~, \ e Tit L~w1E N.t~:o7=4o'E.
g 1 ' \ - SO. oo'
1 I \ - -----------~loT.~ati------ ~ 111.44
aACSE % I ` nA 1 GOMMo>!JWEA~.T A21dE
iT ~+- \
F.x~sTl-~s I \ ` ~ oT.
I~ \ h° b t P•u•~-• P2oPE2TY of
\ ~y `~p~ \\ I~ nUMAE EPITEfLf'iZISES
IN \ bo°,~ •~ `\ 0~. ~ (n.Ps. 124V P6. 1950)
I \\~P`• ~ ra d
~ ~ '3 ~~ Tax d Sf.14-3-1.1
/ ~~.°, ~\\ ~N o~\ TRACT 1
cl J \\\ ~ ~ ~ `\ 3. o o A c.
~- `
\ ~ 1~ `
\ d 1 `\
W \\rZ' i\ \\
C
z ~ ' \\\ ~
~ \~ \ r
1\ \ \, ~
~ n
' 1
....~1- ~ '.
29 i 3o j
' lo•r.
W I
~
t l W 1 i t
~ ~ I ~~ 2
~ C i ~L'~K•.
O
~ ~ P<
11
~~
~'S
_
--- -
Ifl
c
X.
9 `
.
~
.
1
9. -~.----+ ~ •37
~ _
I I (s,
nV
'
'
E
5.~' 43' .~.
g"4. 1 I
~I
I ~1
i ~
i ~
i ~
i I
,~
~~
1
J
a in
I
YN i
~.
.r 1 N
1 Ir
I~~ ~ I. ;
SECr+ E-JT's ouT51AE 7
oUT nE 40~ ~ir~TN of
R.E.J T To ~1e~o~NING
4A~c~ Q.oRf~ ~~1 Afa.JH.lo
MAC TA~w1afS~Q.OAf>'.
1 I
I '~~ M~ti
"M" I
'~ 20An EX Aac=
TEN~IO~
`58.~2E
3\
02' M•!
TAX #
Tle sT 1 l.Z
q ~' 7` 3
2.9y Act
ac
a'=
~Q/ ~
it ~
ROANOKE COUNTY
DEPARTMENT OF
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
PROPERTY BEING SOLD
Y ' '~ "..
' AT A REGULAR MEETINELDFATHTHEOROANOKESCOUNTYSADMINISTRATOION
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, H
CENTER ON TUESDAY, MAY 9, 1989
ORDINANCE ACCEPTING AN OFFER FOR MORE
AUTHORIZING THE SALE OF 1.4 ACRES,
OR LESS, IN THE SOUTHWEST INDUSTRIAL PARK
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.01 of
the Charter of Roanoke County, the subject property has been de-
clared to be surplus and is being made available for other public
uses, i.e. economic development; and
2. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of
the Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading was held on April
25, 1989; and a second reading was held on May 9, 1989, concern-
ing the sale and disposition of 1.4 acres, more or less, in the
Southwest Industrial Park; and
3. That offers having been received for said property,
the offer of Gorman Howell to purchase 1.4 acres, more or less,
for $35,500 is hereby accepted and all other offers are rejected;
and
4. That all proceeds from the sale of this real estate
are to be allocated to the capital reserves of the County; and
5. That the County Administrator is authorized to exe-
cute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke
County as are necessary to accomplish the conveyance of said pro-
perty, all of which shall be upon form approved by the County
Attorney.
. ~.-- 3
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, MAY 9, 1989
ORDINANCE 5989-8 AUTHORIZING THE LEASE OF
10.40 ACRES OF REAL ESTATE TO JOHN D.
WILLEY
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of
the Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading concerning the
disposition of the hereinabove-described real estate was held on
April 25, 1989. The second reading on this matter was held on
May 9, 1989; and
2. This property consists of approximately 10.40 acres
of real estate with improvements identified as Roanoke County Tax
Map No. 73.00-1-5; and
3. That it is in the County's best interests to lease
this property to John D. Willey in order to safeguard the valu-
able improvements thereon and to receive fair market value lease
payments until such time as it may be necessary to utilize said
property in connection with the Spring Hollow Reservoir Project.
This lease is subject to the provisions of Section 15.1-260 and
Section 15.1-261.1 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended; and
4. That the County Administrator is authorized to exe-
cute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke
County as are necessary to accomplish this transaction, all of
which shall be upon a form approved by the County Attorney.
On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor
Robers and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, Nickens, Garrett
NAY5: None
ABSENT: Supervisor McGraw
A COPY TESTE:
~•
Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Paul Mahoney, County Attorney
John Willey, Director, Real Estate Assessment
John Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator
Cliff Craig, Director, Utilities
Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance
2
ACTION 4~
ITEM NUMBER ~-~
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: May 9, 1989
AGENDA ITEM:
Ordinance authorizing the lease of 10.40 acres of
real estate to John D. Willey
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
On June 17, 1986, the Board of Supervisors authorized the
County Administrator to exercise an option to acquire a 10.40-
acre tract of real estate with improvements identified as Roanoke
County Tax Map No. 73.00-1-6. This property was acquired for the
Spring Hollow Reservoir Project for the purchase price of $95,400.
Oscar W. Hall and Josephine Musser Hall, the sellers of the pro-
perty, have leased the premises from December 3, 1987 to present.
However, pursuant to paragraph 3 of the lease agreement between
the County and the Halls, the Halls gave the County notice of
their intention to terminate the lease.
John D. Willey desires to lease the property from the County.
Staff has determined a fair market value rental for the premises
and has negotiated a lease agreement. It is in the County's best
interests to lease this property to safeguard the valuable
improvements thereon and to receive fair market value lease pay-
ments until such time as the County deems it necessary to utilize
the property.
Any lease of County real estate must be accomplished by
ordinance. The first reading of the proposed ordinance was held
on April 25, 1989; the second reading was held on May 9, 1989.
FISCAL IMPACTS:
$350 per month revenue for the term of the lease.
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Authorize the County Administrator to execute such docu-
ments and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County as are
- ~ ° ,~
necessary to accomplish the conveyance of said property, all of
which shall be upon form approved by the County Attorney.
2. Do not authorize the County Administrator to execute
such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County
as are necessary to accomplish the conveyance of said property,
all of which shall be upon form approved by the County Attorney.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
1. Staff recommends Alternative No. 1.
Respectfully submitted,
~~ ~~~
Sarah A. Rice
Assistant County Attorney
-----------------------------------------------
ACTION VOTE
,., _ ~ ,.., n h
Approved ( )
Denied ( )
Received ( )
Referred
To
Motion by:
Garrett
Johnson
McGraw
Nickens
Robers
. ' • A "'
,.
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD. AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, MAY 9, 1989
ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE LEASE OF 10.40
ACRES OF REAL ESTATE TO JOHN D. WILLEY
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of
the Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading concerning the
disposition of the hereinabove-described real estate was held on
April 25, 1989. The second reading on this matter was held on
May 9, 1989; and
2. This property consists of approximately 10.40 acres
of real estate with improvements identified as Roanoke County Tax
Map No. 73.00-1-6; and
3. That it is in the County's best interests to lease
this property to John D. Willey in order to safeguard the valu-
able improvements thereon and to receive fair market value lease
payments until such time as it may be necessary to utilize said
property in connection with the Spring Hollow Reservoir Project.
This lease is subject to the provisions of Section 15.1-260 and
Section 15.1-261.1 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended; and
4. That the County Administrator is authorized to exe-
cute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke
County as are necessary to accomplish this transaction, all of
which shall be upon a form approved by the County Attorney.
`L
OFFICE OF ATTORNEY FOR THE COMMONWEALTH
FOR ROANOKE COUNTY VIRGINIA
305 EAST MAIN STREET'
SALEM, VIRGINIA 24153
(703) 3876174
FRANCES WII.LIAM BURKART, III
COMMONWEALTH'S ATTORNEY
May 9, 1989
Paul M. Mahoney
County Attorneys Office
3738 Brambleton Avenue, S.W.
Roanoke, Virginia 24018
Dear Paul:
ASSISTANT COMMONWEALTH'S ATTORNEY
EDWIN R. LEACH
WII.LIAM D. BROADHURST
MARK W. CLAYTOR
I am writing in response to an inquiry from John D. Willey,
Director of Real Estate Assessments, in regard to his leasing
an 10.4 acre track of land from Roanoke County. I am attaching
a copy of the letter sent to me by Mr. Willey setting out the
pertinent details.
As we have previously discussed, I feel that no conflict
of interest would exist in leasing this property to Mr. Willey
as long as he pays a fair rental value for the property. It
is my understanding that prior to a lease being entered, the
County will obtain an "independent" assessement of said fair
rental value. Obviously Roanoke County will benefit from the
income generated by this property, and as long as Mr. Willey
or a member of his office does not determine the fair rental
value I do not forsee any problem.
If I may be of any further assistance, please feel free
to contact me.
Sincerely, ~ ~ ~+ ~-
Francis W. Burkart, III
FWBIII/swt
~.
-r -
.oF aonrvo~.~
~ ~
~.
o Z
a
18 '~° 88
~F80UICENTENN~P~
A Btawti~ulBtginning
November 28, 1988
Francis W. Burkart
Commonwealth Attorney
County of Roanoke, Virginia
Dear Mr. Burkart:
JOHN D. WILLEY
DIRECTOR OF
REAL ESTATE ASSESSMENTS
I am writing in regard to my position as Real Property Tax Assessor for
Roanoke County and the possibility of my leasing a certain property owned by
Roanoke County. The inquiry is directed to ascertaining whether or not a real
or potential conflict of interest may exist and pertinent facts are as
follows:
The property in question is an improved 10.4 acre tract purchased by the
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors on December 29, 1986, from Josephine M.
and Oscar W. Hall. This is one of the properties acquired by the Board of
Supervisors in relation to the Spring Hollow Reservoir project. I was
involved in the acquisition of this property in that I wrote an opinion of
value for Mr: John Hubbard, Superintendent of Public Facilities, on June 9,
1984. Mr. Hubbard also asked for and received an opinion of market rental
value from me for the property on October 23, 1986. The Hall's currently
rent this property from the Board of Supervisors and will vacate the
property in January of 1989.
All negotiations for the option to purchase, the actual acquisition and the
subsequent lease to the Hall's were conducted by Mr. Hubbard, and except for
these two documented instances, I have had no involvement in this matter.
Mr. Hubbard recently asked me if, as an individual, I would be interested in
leasing the property from Roanoke County under the same terms and conditions
as the Hall's. This offer was made because Mr. Hubbard was aware that I was
searching for a house to rent and not because of my government employment.
He felt as though the immediate re-occupancy would help prevent vandalism
and deterioration of the structure as has happened in other instances in the
area and save the County money on advertising costs and agents fees.
C~nunf~ of ~Rn~nnke
REAL ESTATE ASSESSMENT
P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24018 (703) 772-2035
J• .
Page 2,
November 28, 1988
I can honestly state that at no time has my position as Director of Real
Estate Assessments for Roanoke County been a factor in the offer to rent, the
rental price, or other considerations or conditions concerning this
proposition. I would very much appreciate your views concerning this possible
contract between myself as an individual and lessee and Roanoke County as
lessor and any legal implications. Thank you for your opinion in this"matter.
Sincerely,
\.
hn D. Willey, A.S.A.
Director of Real Estate Assessments
JDW/pp
{r
T~
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, MAY 9, 1989
ORDINANCE 5989-9 AMENDING ARTICLE II,
"VIRGINIA STATEWIDE FIRE PREVENTION CODE"
OF CHAPTER 9, "FIRE PREVENTION AND
PROTECTION" OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE BY
THE ADDITION OF SECTION F-318.1, "COO:KING
DEVICES ON OR UNDER BALCONIES"
WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 52488-13 adopted on May 24,
1988, repealed the old fire prevention code and adopted the Vir-
ginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code; and
WHEREAS, Section 27-98 of the Code of Virginia of 1950,
as amended, authorizes local governments to enforce the Virginia
Statewide Fire Prevention Code; and
WHEREAS, Section 27-97 of the Code of Virginia of 1950,
as amended, authorizes local governments to adopt fire prevention
regulations that are more restrictive or more extensive in scope
than the Statewide Fire Prevention Code; and
WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Fire Marshal recommends the
adoption of this ordinance to alleviate a threat to the public
health, safety, and welfare; and
WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held
on April 25, 1989; the second reading of this ordinance was held
on May 9, 1989.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the Board of Supervi-
sors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That Article II, "Virginia Statewide Fire Preven-
tion Code" of Chapter 9 of the Roanoke County Code is hereby
amended and reenacted and changed pursuant to Section 27-97 of
the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, as follows:
F-318.1 Cooking Devices on or under Balconies
No charcoal cooker, brazier, hibachi or grill, or any
gasoline or other flammable liquid of liquified petroleum gas-
fired stove or similar device shall be ignited or used on or__
under the balconies of any apartment building or similar
occupancy which are constructed of combustible materials. The
management of such occupancies shall notify its tenants in
writing of this code requirement at the time the tenant initially
occupies the apartment and from time to time as necessary to
ensure compliance.
2. The provisions of this ordinance shall be effective
from and after May 10, 1989.
On motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by Supervisor
Robers and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Supervisor McGraw
A COPY TESTE:
Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Thomas Fuqua, Chief, Fire & Rescue
K. R. Sharp, Fire Marshall
Paul Mahoney, County Attorney
Skip Burkart, Commonwealth Attorney
Magistrate
Sheriff's Department
Roanoke Law Library, 315 Church Avenue, S.W., Rke, 24016
Main Library
Roanoke County Code book
Roanoke County J&D Court, Intake Counsellor
2
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY
MEETING DATE; May 9, 1989
ITEM NUMBER ~_
SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
ADMINISTRATION CENTER
AGENDA ITEM: Enact an ordinance to control the use of certain
cooking devices on apartments, condominiums and similar occupancies
(balconies or patios).
COUt1TY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMr NTS:
,j /J
BACKGROUND: When the Virginia State Fire Prevention Code was
adopted on May 24, 1988, Section 9-39 of Article III of the old fire
prevention code was repealed. This section prohibits the use of
certain grills and cookers on balconies of multi-family occupancies.
The proposed ordinance is identical to the previous code. The use
of certain cooking devices on combustible balconies endangers the
lives and property of everyone in the structure.
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
Action Required
Amend the Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention-Code by adding
Section F-318 "Cooking Devices on Balconies." F-318.1 shall read:
"No charcoal cooker, brazier, hibachi or grill, or any
gasoline or other flammable liquid or liquified petroleum
gas-fired stove or similar device shall be ignited or used
on the balconies of any apartment building or similar
occupancy which are constructed of combustible materials.
The management of such occupancies shall notify its
tenants in writing of this code requirement at the time
the tenant initially occupies the apartment and from time
to time as necessary to ensure compliance."
ALTERNATIVES AND ID]PACTS:
Fiscal Impact: None
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the adoption of this code section. This issue
was addressed under the old code because of several fires that
occurred as a result of using open fire grills on combustible
balconies.
1
SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED: ~ _
~(,{'
K. /R Sha --------- ------
P
Fire Marshal
Elme C. Hodg e Jr.
County Administrator
----------------------------------------------------------
ACTION VOTE
Approved ( ) Motion by:
Denied ( ) ------------
Received ( ) -----------------------
Referred ---------'-------
To ----------- -------
No Yes Abs
Garrett ____
Johnson ___ ___
McGraw ___ ___ ___
Nickens __
Robers
` ~~
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, MAY 9, 1989
ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE II, "VIRGINIA
STATEWIDE FIRE PREVENTION CODE" OF CHAP-
TER 9, "FIRE PREVENTION AND PROTECTION"
OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE BY THE ADDI-
TION OF SECTION F-318.1, "COOKING DEVICES
ON OR UNDER BALCONIES"
WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 52488-13 adopted on May 24,
1988, repealed the old fire prevention code and adopted the Vir-
ginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code; and
WHEREAS, Section 27-98 of the Code of Virginia of 1950,
as amended, authorizes local governments to enforce the Virginia
Statewide Fire Prevention Code; and
WHEREAS, Section 27-97 of the Code of Virginia of 1950,
as amended, authorizes local governments to adopt fire prevention
regulations that are more restrictive or more extensive in scope
than the Statewide Fire Prevention Code; and
WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Fire Marshal recommends the
adoption of this ordinance to alleviate a threat to the public
health, safety, and welfare; and
WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held
on April 25, 1989; the second reading of this ordinance was held
on May 9, 1989.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the Board of Supervi-
sors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That Article II, "Virginia Statewide Fire Preven-
tion Code" of Chapter 9 of the Roanoke County Code is hereby
"[_ r
amended and reenacted and changed pursuant to Section 27-97 of
the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, as follows:
F-318.1 Cookin Devices on or under Balconies
No charcoal cooker, brazier, hibachi or grill, or any
asoline or other flammable liquid of liquified petroleum gas-
fired stove or similar device shall be i nited or used on or
under the balconies of an a artment buildin or similar
occu anc which are constructed of combustible materials. The
mana ement of such occu ancies shall notif its tenants in
writing of this code requirement at the time the tenant initially
occupies the apartment and from time to time as necessary to
ensure compliance.
2. The provisions of this ordinance shall be effective
from and after May 10, 1989.
...-
,.~» ..~
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, MAY 9, 1989
ORDINANCE 5989-10 VACATING A PORTION OF
AN UNIMPROVED FIFTY (50) FOOT
RIGHT-OF-WAY IDENTIFIED AS "NORTH
MOUNTAIN DRIVE," SECTION FIVE OF SOUTHERN
PINES SUBDIVISION
WHEREAS, Old Heritage Corporation has petitioned the
Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, to vacate a
portion of an unimproved fifty (50) foot right-of-way identified
as "North Mountain Drive," Section 5 of Southern Pines Subdivi-
sion as recorded in Plat Book 2, page 138 in the Clerk's Office
of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia; and
WHEREAS, Section 15.1-482(b) of the 1950 Code of Virgin-
ia, as amended, requires that such a request be accomplished by
ordinance of the governing body; and
WHEREAS, notice has been given as required by Section
15.1-431 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and a public
hearing and first reading of this ordinance was held on April 25,
1989; and the second reading of this ordinance was held on May 9,
1989.
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That a portion of an unimproved fifty (50) foot
right-of-way approximately 840 feet in length, identified as
"North Mountain Drive," Section 5 of Southern Pines Subdivision
as recorded in Plat Book 2, page 138 in the Clerk's Office of the
Circuit Court for the County of Roanoke, Virginia, be, and hereby
is, vacated pursuant to Section 15.1-482(b) of the 1950 Code of
Virginia, as amended; and
2. That this ordinance shall be in full force and
effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances
or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this
ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed.
3. That petitioner shall record a certified copy of
this ordinance with the Clerk of the Circuit Court and shall pay
all fees required to accomplish this transaction.
On motion of Supervisor Garrett, seconded by Supervisor
Robers and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Supervisor McGraw
A COPY TESTE:
Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Arnold Covey, Director, Development & Inspections
Terry Harrington, Director, Planning
Phillip Henry, Director, Engineering
Cliff Craig, Director, Utilities
John Willey, Director, Real Estate Assessment
2
ACTION #
ITEM NUMBER ..L•""
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: May 9, 1989
AGENDA ITEM: Vacation of a portion of an unimproved 50 foot
right-of-way referred to as "North Mountain Drive", recorded in
Plat Book 2, Page 138, Section 5, Southern Pines Subdivision.
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
.x~+
BACKGROUND:
Old Heritage Corp. is requesting the Roanoke County Board of
Supervisors, by Ordinance, to vacate a portion of North Mountain
Drive shown on previously Platted Subdivision referred to as
Section 5, Southern Pines, recorded on May 27, 1940.
The portion of North Mountain Drive requested to be vacated,
is from its intersection with Woodland Drive to end,
approximately 840 feet in length.
The vacation is necessary to abolish any encumbrance that
may effect the development of their property.
Old Heritage is presently planning the development of
Section 23 of Hunting Hills which will encompass a portion of
this existing right-of-way.
The first reading of the Ordinance was held on April 25,
1989; staff recommends approval of Ordinance after second reading
to be held on May 9, 1989.
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
Roanoke County is requesting, prior to final approval of the
subdivision plans for Hunting Hills, Section 23, that the fifty
foot right-of-way referred to as North Mountain Drive, shown on
the Plat of Section 5, Southern Pines, be vacated in accordance
with Chapter 11, Title 51.1-482 (b), Code of Virginia, 1950, as
amended, by the adoption of the attached Ordinance.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors adopt the
proposed Ordinance to vacate a portion of a fifty foot
right-of-way referred to as North Mountain Drive.
MITTED BY:
Arnold Co~'ey `
Director of Developme t Review
and Inspections
APPROVED:
~~
El er C. Hodge
County Administrator
-------------------------------------------------------
ACT IOt~ VOTE
Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs
Denied
Received
Referred
to
Garrett
Johnson
McGraw
Nickens
Robers
~s
NORTH
~.....~
~~~
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, MAY 9, 1989
ORDINANCE VACATING A PORTION OF AN UNIM-
PROVED FIFTY (50) FOOT RIGHT-OF-WAY IDEN-
TIFIED AS "NORTH MOUNTAIN DRIVE," SECTION
FIVE OF SOUTHERN PINES SUBDIVISION
WHEREAS, Old Heritage Corporation has petitioned the
Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, to vacate a
portion of an unimproved fifty (50) foot right-of-way identified
as "North Mountain Drive," Section 5 of Southern Pines Subdivi-
sion as recorded in Plat Book 2, page 138 in the Clerk's Office
of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia; and
WHEREAS, Section 15.1-482(b) of the 1950 Code of Virgin-
ia, as amended, requires that such a request be accomplished by
ordinance of the governing body; and
WHEREAS, notice has been given as required by Section
15.1-431 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and a public
hearing and first reading of this ordinance was held on April 25,
1989; and the second reading of this ordinance was held on May 9,
1989.
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That a portion of an unimproved fifty (50) foot
right-of-way approximately 840 feet in length, identified as
"North Mountain Drive," Section 5 of Southern Pines Subdivision
as recorded in Plat Book 2, page 138 in the Clerk's Office of the
Circuit Court for the County of Roanoke, Virginia, be, and hereby
is, vacated pursuant to Section 15.1-482(b) of the 1950 Code of
Virginia, as amended; and
-5
2. That this ordinance shall be in full force and
effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances
or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this
ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed.
3. That petitioner shall record a certified copy of
this ordinance with the Clerk of the Circuit Court and shall pay
all fees required to accomplish this transaction.
t
,. ,
t ~ ~' =~a
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, MAY 9, 1989
ORDINANCE 5989-11 VACATING A FIFTEEN (15)
FOOT PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT BETWEEN LOTS
3 AND 4, BLOCK 1, SECTION 1, HIGHFIELDS
FARMS
WHEREAS, Roy Lochner, the owner of Lots 3 and 4, Block
1, Section 1, Highfields Farms, has petitioned the Board of Super-
visors of Roanoke County, Virginia, to vacate a fifteen (15) foot
public utility easement between Lots 3 and 4, Block 1, Section 1,
Highfields Farms as recorded in Plat Book 9, page 348 in the
Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia;
and
WHEREAS, Section 15.1-482(b) of the 1950 Code of Virgin-
ia, as amended, requires that such a request be accomplished by
ordinance of the governing body; and
WHEREAS, notice has been given as required by Section
15.1-431 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and a public
hearing and first reading of this ordinance was held on April 25,
1989; and the second reading of this ordinance was held on May 9,
1989.
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That a fifteen (15) foot public utility easement
between Lots 3 and 4, Block 1, Section 1, Highfields Farms as
recorded in Plat Book 9, page 348 in the Clerk's Office of the
Circuit Court for the County of Roanoke, Virginia, be, and hereby
is, vacated pursuant to Section 15.1-482(b) of the 1950 Code of
Virginia, as amended; and
2. That this ordinance shall be in full force and
effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances
or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this
ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed.
3. That petitioner shall record a certified copy of
this ordinance with the Clerk of the Circuit Court and shall pay
all fees required to accomplish this transaction.
On motion of Supervisor Garrett, seconded by Supervisor
Nickens and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Supervisor McGraw
A COPY TESTE:
.mod -
Mary H. A len, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Arnold Covey, Director, Development & Inspections
Terry Harrington, Director, Planning
Phillip Henry, Director, Engineering
Cliff Craig, Director, Utilities
John Willey, Director, Real Estate Assessment
2
F
ACTION #
ITEM NUMBER .L"
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE•
AGENDA ITEM:
May 9, 1989
Vacation of a Public Utility Easement
COUNTY ADMINISTRAeTOR'S COMMENTS:
D~~^~`
BACKGROUND:
Roy Lochner, the owner of Lots 3 and 4, Block 1, Section 1,
Highfields Farms, has requested a vacation of a fifteen foot
Public Utility Easement which lies parallel with the common lot
line of Lots 3 and 4, recorded in Plat Book 9, Page 348.
The owner has plans to construct a house which will
transverse the common property lines of both lots and the Public
Utility Easement.
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
Roanoke County is requesting, prior to issuance of a
building permit, the Public Utility Easement be vacated in
accordance with Chapter 11, Title 15.1 - 482(b>, Code of
Virginia, 1950, by the adoption of the attached Ordinance.
The vacation of the common lot line will be handled
administratively under Section 17-23 of the Roanoke County
Subdivision Ordinance.
The local utility companies and the Department of
Engineering have commented that they have no objections to
vacating the easement.
The first reading of the Ordinance was held on April 25,
1989; staff recommends approval of Ordinance after second
reading, to be held on May 9, 1989.
~6
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors adopt the
proposed Ordinance to vacate the referenced Easement.
BMITTED BY:
Arnold Covey \ ~'
Director of Developme t Review
and Inspections
APPROVED:
~,
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
-----------------------------------------------------------------
ACTION VOTE
Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs
Denied ( ) Garrett
Received ( ) Johnson
Referred McGraw
to Nickens
Robers
~-l~
NORTB
COMMUNITySBRVICBS VACATION OF A FIFTEEN FOOT
PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT
ANDDgyBLOPMBNT HIGHFIELDS FARM SUBDIVISION
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, MAY 9, 1989
ORDINANCE VACATING A FIFTEEN (15) FOOT
PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT BETWEEN LOTS 3
AND 4, BLOCK 1, SECTION 1, HIGHFIELDS
FARMS
WHEREAS, Roy Lochner, the owner of Lots 3 and 4, Block
1, Section 1, Highfields Farms, has petitioned the Board of Super-
visors of Roanoke County, Virginia, to vacate a fifteen (15) foot
public utility easement between Lots 3 and 4, Block 1, Section 1,
Highfields Farms as recorded in Plat Book 9, page 348 in the
Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia;
and
WHEREAS, Section 15.1-482(b) of the 1950 Code of Virgin-
ia, as amended, requires that such a request be accomplished by
ordinance of the governing body; and
WHEREAS, notice has been given as required by Section
15.1-431 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and a public
hearing and first reading of this ordinance was held on April 25,
1989; and the second reading of this ordinance was held on May 9,
1989.
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That a fifteen (15) foot public utility easement
between Lots 3 and 4, Block 1, Section 1, Highfields Farms as
recorded in Plat Book 9, page 348 in the Clerk's Office of the
Circuit Court for the County of Roanoke, Virginia, be, and hereby
is, vacated pursuant to Section 15.1-482(b) of the 1950 Code of
Virginia, as amended; and
~.
2. That this ordinance. shall be in full force and
effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances
or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this
ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed.
3. That petitioner shall record a certified copy of
this ordinance with the Clerk of the Circuit Court and shall pay
all fees required to accomplish this transaction.
ACTION NUMBER
ITEM NUMBER S -/
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: May 9, 1989
AGENDA ITEM: Appointments to the Board of Zoning Appeals
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
BACKGROUND
The Virginia General Assembly recently approved a change in the
Roanoke County Charter authorizing the Board of Supervisors to
appoint members to the Board of Zoning Appeals. Previously this
Board was appointed by the judge of the Circuit Court.
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION
On March 1, 1989, Frank W. Martin, representing the Windsor Hills
Magisterial District resigned. His unexpired five-year term will
expire June 30, 1991.
The five-year term of Neil W. Owen, representing the Cave Spring
Magisterial District will expire June 30, 1989.
Chairman Lee Garrett directed that a public notice be advertised
in the Roanoke Times and World News requesting interested
citizens to apply for these vacant positions. Attached is a copy
of the public notice which will run in the South Zone of the
Neighbors section for two weeks. The deadline for application is
June 2, 1989.
Following receipt of applications from any interested citizens,
Supervisors Garrett and Robers will make their appointments. It
is not necessary that they make these appointments only from
those who applied. The purpose of the public notice is to open
the process to those citizens who might be qualified and willing
to serve on the Board of Zoning Appeals.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
s~
It is recommended that appointments to the Board of Zoning
Appeals be continued until applications are received by the Board
of Supervisors from interested citizens.
SUBMITTED BY:
APPROVED BY:
Mary H. Allen Elmer C. Hodge
Deputy Clerk County Administrator
---------------------------------------------
ACTION VOTE
Approved ( ) Motion by: Yes No Abs
Denied ( ) Garrett
Received ( )
Referred
To:
Johnson
McGraw
Nickens
Robers
BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
A. COMPOSITION:(Summarized from State Code 5.1-494 and
the Roanoke County Charter)
To consist of five (5) members, appointed by the Board of
Supervisors. Their term of office shall be for five years.
Appointments to fill vacancies shall be only for the unexpired
portion of the term. Members may be reappointed to succeed
themselves.
B. DUTIES: (Summarized from State Code 15.1-495)
To hear and decide appeals from any order, requirement,
decision or determination made by an administrative officer in
the administration or enforcement of this article or of any
ordinance adopted pursuant thereto. To authorize upon appeal or
original application in special cases such variance from the
terms of the ordinance as will not be contrary to the public
interest, when owing to special conditions a literal enforcement
of the provisions will result in unnecessary hardship; provided
that the spirit of the ordinance shall be observed and
substantial justice done. To hear and decide appeals from the
decisions of the zoning administrator or applications for special
exceptions. To hear and decide applications for interpretation
of the district map where there is any uncertainty as to the
location of a district boundary.
C. MEETING SCHEDULE:
Third Wednesday of each month; held in the Roanoke County
Administrative Center at 7:30 p.m.
PUBLIC NOTICE
The Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia is soliciting
applications for two appointments to the Board of Zoning Appeals.
One member shall be selected to represent the Windsor Hills Magisteri-
al District for an unexpired five-year term beginning immediately and
expiring on June 30, 1991. One member shall be selected from the
Cave Soring Magisterial District for afive-year teem beginning July 1,
1989 and expiring on June 30, 1994.
Application for such positions shall be limited to applicants who are
bona fide residents of the Windsor Hills Magisterial District or the Cave
Spring Magisterial District.
Applications and written information describing the duties and respon-
sibilities of the Board of Zoning Appeals are available from the Deputy
Clerk to the Board of Supervisors, P.O. Box 29800, Roanoke, Virginia
24018. Applications will be received at the Deputy Clerk's Office until
5:00 p.m. on June 2, 1989. Selection of the two members shall be
announced at a regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors of
Roanoke County, Virginia.
Ma_rk.Ei. Allen, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Suoervisors
ACTION NUMBER
ITEM NUMBER"~°~
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: May 9, 1989
AGENDA ITEM: Appointments to the Clean Valley Council
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
BACKGROUND
Roanoke County presently has two representatives on the Clean
Valley Council, both representing local government. River
Bonhotel, Supervisor of Solid Waste Operations and Supervisor
Richard Robers. A member of the Board of Supervisors has
traditionally been appointed to serve as an honorary advisory
member. At the present time, there are no citizens
representing Roanoke County on the Clean Valley Council.
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION
The two-year term of Richard Robers will expire June 30, 1989.
Mr. Robers has expressed an interest in continuing to serve only
as an honorary advisory member, representing the Board of
Supervisors. However, he has declined to be an active
participating member.
The Clean Valley has suggested that another active member
presenting Roanoke County be appointed for a two-year term. This
would raise the county representation to three members. Please
see the attached letter for further information.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors appoint Richard
Robers to another two-year term as an advisory honorary member of
the Clean Valley Council.
It is further recommended that an additional member be appointed
to serve a two-year term, representing the citizens of Roanoke
County.
SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: ~~
YY1 ~/. G:t~c-env ~iliru.~-
Mary H. Allen Elmer C. Hodge
Deputy Clerk County Administrator
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Approved ( )
Denied ( )
Received ( )
Referred
To:
ACTION
Motion by:
VOTE
Yes No Abs
Garrett
Johnson
McGraw
Nickens
Robers
~- ~ a~R 1 ~ ~,~~y
Clean Valley Council
Ms. Mary Allen, Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
P. 0. Box 29800
Roanoke, Virginia 24018
Dear Ms. Allen:
April 11, 1989
Enclosed is a copy of the By-laws of the Clean Valley Council. At
our annual meeting held on March 22, 1988, the following directors
were elected to two-year terms beginning July 1, 1988:
Karen Conklin
Barbara Dowdy
David Fulk
Jo Ann Hazelgrove
Edwin Hunter
Mark Mulholland
Jack Parrott
Debbie Sinex
Helen Smythers
C At our meeting on March 28, 1989, the following directors were
elected to two-year terms beginning July 1, 1989:
Pam Berg
River Bonhotel
Bill Clark
Ron Hachey
Mary Beth Layman
Jim McClung
Lee Osborne
Dave Riddle
Officers for the 1989/90 year, beginning July 1, 1989, are as follows:
President
Vice President
Secretary
Treasurer
River Bonhotel
Debbie Sinex
Edwin Hunter
Jim McClung
lVe would be pleased to continue to have a member of the Board of
Supervisors on our Board, as an active member or honorary member. Or,
we would welcome a recommendation from the Board of Supervisors of a
citizen as its representative. In either event we wish to continue to
keep the Board fully informed of our activities.
Sincerely,
Enclosure
Ann E. Weaver
Executive Director
~...
P.O. Box 3320, Roanoke Valley, Virginia 24015-1320 Phone (703) 345-5523
ACTION NUMBER
ITEM NUMBER ~~
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: May 9, 1989
SUBJECT: Appointments to Committees, Commissions and Boards
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
Community Corrections Resources Board
One-year term of Edmund J. Kielty, Alternate. His term expired
August 13, 1988.
Fifth Planning District Commission
Three-year terms of Richard Robers and Alfred Anderson, elected
representatives, and John Hubbard, Citizen Representative and
Executive Committee member will expire June 30, 1989.
Mr. Hubbard does not wish to serve another term. Although Mr.
Hubbard is on the County staff, this appointment must only be a
Roanoke County citizens, and not necessarily on the staff.
Landfill Citizens Advisory Committee
Deborah Zamorski has resigned as a member of this committee
representing the Boones Chapel proposed site in the Cave Spring
Magisterial District.
Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission
Three-year terms of Vince Joyce, Cave Spring Magisterial
District, Alice Gillespie, Hollins Magisterial District and
Thomas Robertson, Vinton Magisterial District will expire June
30, 1989.
SUBMITTED BY:
~G~ ~'
Mary H. Allen
Deputy Clerk
~ ~~~
APPROVED BY:
~% ~ ~
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
-----------------------------------------------------------------
ACTION VOTE
Approved ( ) Motion by: Yes No Abs
Denied ( ) Garrett
Received ( ) Johnson
Referred McGraw
To• Nickens
Robers
~,,.1
'~, COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS RESOURCES BOARD
A. COMPOSITION: (From Bylaws and Section 53.1-183)
To consist of seven members appointed as follows: one
member from Roanoke County; one member from Salem City; three
members from the judges in the 23rd Judicial District; one member
from the Department of Corrections. The term of office shall be
determined by the appointing authority (Roanoke County's is one
year . )
8. DUTIES:
Review felony referrals from the Circuit Courts of
Roanoke City, Roanoke County and the City of Salem for possible
diversion from state penal system and local jails.
C. MEETINGS:
Third Tuesday of each month at 4:00 p.m.
~- __
S~
FIFTH PLANNING DISTRICT COMMISSION
A. COMPOSITION
Commission to consist of five (5) representatives of
Roanoke County based on population, three representatives who
shall be elected members of the governing bodies, and two members
who shall be non-elected citizens. The term of office shall be
three years.
One of the members shall also serve on the Executive
Committee .
The Fifth Planning District Commission represents
participating local governments included in the geographic area
delineated by the Commonwealth of Virginia. The commission is
composed of 21 elected and citizen representatives of the
participating jurisdictions.
B. DUTIES
The purpose of the commission as defined by the Virginia
{ Area Development Act is "...to promote orderly and efficient
development of the physical, social and economic elements of the
District by planning, encouraging and assisting governmental
subdivisions to plan for the future."
The general management program category provides the
basic organization and management of commission activities and
routine administrative functions. Because general management
supports the entire operation of the commission's work program,
costs allocated to the program activity are generally considered
as administrative or indirect costs and charged to other program
categories in accordance with the Commission's Cost Allocation
Plan .
C. MEETING SCHEDULE
Fourth Thursday of each month; held in Commission
Conference Room, at 3:00 p.m. (time subject to change.)
fifth Planning District Commission
145 West Campbell Avenue P.O. Box 2569 Roanoke, Virginia 24010 (703) 343-4417
May 3, 1989
Ms. Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
P.0. Box 29800
Roanoke, Virginia 24018-0798
Dear Ms. Allen:
According to our record of appointments, the term of Mr. John Hubbard,
non-elected representative of Roanoke County on the Fifth Planning District
Commission and Executive Committee, expires June 30, 1989. Mr. Hubbard was
appointed by Roanoke County in May 1988 to fill the unexpired term of Mr.
Timothy W. Gubala. The Commission Bylaws state that all appointments are for
three-year terms. Mr. Hubbard is, of course, eligible for reappointment.
Please notify the Commission of Roanoke County's official action in filling
this upcoming vacancy on the Commission and Executive Committee. Thank you.
Yours truly,
Wayne Strickland
Secretary to the Commission
WGS:jIp
cc: Mr. Harry A. Walton, Jr., Chairman, 5PDC
Mr. John Hubbard
Alleghany County • Botetourt County • Craig County • Roanoke County
City of Clifton Forge • City of Covington • City of Roanoke • City of Salem • Town of Vinton
~~
Fifth Planning District Commission
145 West Campbell Avenue P.O. Box 2569 Roanoke, Virginia 24010 (703) 343-4417
May 3, 1989
Ms. Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
P.O. Box 29800
Roanoke, Virginia 24018-0798
Dear Ms. Allen:
According to our record of appointments, the term of Mr. Richard Robers,
elected representative of Roanoke County on the Fifth Planning District
Commission and Executive Committee, expires June 30, 1989. The Commission
Bylaws state that all appointments are for three-year terms. Mr. Robers is, of
course, eligible for reappointment.
Please notify the Commission of Roanoke County's official action in filling
this upcoming vacancy on the Commission and Executive Committee. Thank you.
Yours truly,
~~ V ~(. ~a
Wayne G. Strickland
Secretary to the Commission
WGS:jIp
cc: Mr. Harry A. Walton, Jr., Chairman, SPDC
Mr. Richard Robers
Alleghany County • Botetourt County • Craig County • Roanoke County
City of Clifton Forge • City of Covington • City of Roanoke • City of Salem • Town of Vinton
3'{
" ~ Fifth Plannin District Commission
g
I45 West Campbell Avenue P.O. Box 2569 Roanoke, Virginia 24010 (703) 343-4417
May 3, 1989
Ms. Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
P.0. Box 29800
Roanoke, Virginia 24018-0798
Dear Ms. Allen:
According to our record of appointments, the term of Mr. Fred Anderson,
elected representative of Roanoke County on the Fifth Planning District
Commission and Executive Committee, expires June 30, 1989. The Commission
Bylaws state that all appointments are for three-year terms. Mr. Anderson is,
of course, eligible for reappointment.
Please notify the Commission of Roanoke County's official action in filling
this upcoming vacancy on the Commission and Executive Committee. Thank you.
Yours truly,
Wayne G. Strickland
Secretary to the Commission
WGS:jIp
cc: Mr. Harry A. Walton, Jr., Chairman, 5PDC
Mr. Fred Anderson
Alleghany County • Botetourt County • Craig County • Roanoke County
City of Clifton Forge • City of Covington • City of Roanoke • City of Salem • Town of Vinton
„}
PARRS & RECREATION ADVISORY COMMISSION
A. COMPOSITION: (Resolution 85-151.N, September 10, 1985)
To be composed of two (2) members from each magisterial
district and one (1) member at large from the County. All
members to be appointed by the Board of Supervisors.
Original terms shall be staggared. Upon expiration of
their original terms, each succeeding term shall be for three (3)
years, expiring on June 30th.
B. DUTIES:
The Commission shall serve as the advisory body to the
Director of Parks and Recreation of Roanoke County; the
Commission shall suggest policies to the County Administrator and
the Board of Supervisors through the Director of Parks and
Recreation, within its powers and responsibilities as stated in
this resolution. The Commission shall serve as a liaison between
the Department of Parks and Recreation, the Board of Supervisors,
and the citizens of the community. The Commission will work
through the Parks and Recreation staff on all related matters.
The Commission shall consult with and advise recreation policies,
programs, personnel, finances, and the need for acquiring and
disposing of lands and properties related to the total community
recreation program, and to its long-range, projected program for
recreation.
The Commission shall assume duties for the recreation
purposes as follows: Make recommendations (1) for the
establishment of a system of supervised recreation for the
County; (2) to set apart for use as parks, playgrounds,
recreation centers, water areas, or other recreation areas and
structures, any lands or buildings owned by or leased to the
County and for approval by the Board of Supervisors and may
suggest improvements of such lands and for the construction and
for the equipping and staffing of such buildings and structures
as may be necessary to the recreation program within those funds
allocated; (3) and advise in the acceptance by the County of any
grant, gift, bequest or donation, any personal or real property
offered or made available for recreation purposes and which it
judges to be of present or possible future use or recreation.
Any gift, bequest of money or other property, any grant, devise.
of real or personal property so acquired shall be held, by the
County, used and finally disposed of in accordance with the terms
under which such grant, gift or devise is made and accepted; (4)
and advise in the construction, equipping, operation and
maintenance of parks, playgrounds, recreation centers and all
buildings and structures necessary or useful to the Department
function, and will advise in regard to other recreation
facilities which are owned or controlled by the unit or leased or
loaned to the unit.
ACTION N0.
ITEM NUMBER a - /
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: May 9, 1989
AGENDA ITEM: Appointments to the Court Service Unit Advisory
Council/Youth and Family Services Advisory Board
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
On December 13, 1988, the Board of Supervisors voted to continue
this Board and appoint new members. Michael Lazzuri, Director of
Court Services has contacted the present members of the Court
Service Unit Advisory Council/Youth and Family Services Advisory
Board to determine whether they wished to continue serving.
The following terms expired in 1988 or will expire in 1989.
Appointments to this committee are not made by magisterial
district; however, the magisterial district is listed for each
member.
Two-year term of James L. Trout, Vinton Magisterial District,
will expire March 22, 1989. Mr. Trout has not responded to Mr.
Lazzuri's letter.
Two-year term of Ted R. Powell, Cave Spring Magisterial District,
will expire March 22, 1989. Mr. Powell would like to be
reappointed.
Two-year term of Hoyt C. Rath, Vinton Magisterial District, will
expire March 22, 1989. Mr. Rath does not wish to serve another
term.
Two-year term of Dr. Andrew Archer, Vinton Magisterial District
expired March 22, 1988. Dr. Archer does not wish to be
reappointed.
In addition to the appointments listed above, it is necessary to
appoint four youth members, one each from Cave Spring High
School, Northside High School, Glenvar High School, William Byrd
High School. Mr. Lazzuri recommends that these appointments run
from September through September. Therefore, appointment made in
~'" I
1989 will expire September 1, 1989. Thereafter all terms will
expire September 1, coinciding with the school year.
SUBMITTED BY:
~ • ~~
Mary H. Allen
Deputy Clerk
APPROVED BY:
C/
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
-----------------------------------
ACTION VOTE
Approved ( ) Motion by: Yes No Abs
Denied ( ) Garrett
Received ( ) Johnson
Referred McGraw
Nickens
To•
Robers
2
COURT SERVICES UNIT ADVISORY COUNCIL/YOUTH AND ~'
FAMILY SERVICES ADVISORY BOARD
(Resolution 3046 - 1/26/82
Amended 11/13/85 to include Youth Members)
A. COMPOSITION
Board to consist of ten members, and one youth member from
each high school. Governing bodies of each county and city
served by a court service unit may appoint one or more members to
a citizen advisory council. Judges may appoint the tenth member
at their discretion.
B. DUTIES:
Advises and cooperates with the court upon all matters
affecting the working of this law and other laws relating to
children, their care and protection and to domestic relations.
Consults and confer with the court and director of the
court service unit relative to the development and extension of
the court service program.
Encourage the members selected by the council to serve on
the central advisory council to visit as often as the member
conveniently can, institutions and associations receiving
children under this law and to report to the court the conditions
and surroundings of the children received by or in charge of any
such persons, institutions or associations.
The Council should make themselves familiar with the work
of the court. Makes an annual report to the court and the
participating governing bodies on the work of the council.
As the Youth and Family Services Advisory Board•
Establish goals and priorities for County-wide youth
services; assist in coordination and planning for comprehensive
youth services within the private sector. Serve in an advisory
capacity and to otherwise assist the Board of Supervisors to
establish goals and objectives in compliance with all "minimum
Standards of the Delinquency Prevention and Youth Development Act
of 1979". Assist in conducting an assessment of the needs of
youth every five years and to assist in developing an annual
Delinquency Prevention Plan, further to participate in evaluating
the implementation of the plan and making a report thereon to the
Board of Supervisors. Provide a public forum where concerns
about youth may be expressed and to receive recommendations and
raise concerns of public and private organizations at any regular
advisory board meeting upon proper notice. Advocates necessary
legislative amendments to improve community conditions for youth
development and to support the development of needed services
both public and private for youth in the community.
C. MEETING SCHEDULE:
One a quarter, the third Tuesday, beginning January; time
and place determined at meetings.
M , u
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, MAY 9, 1989
RESOLUTION N0. 5989-12 APPROVING AND
CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH
ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA
FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM L -
CONSENT AGENDA
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That that certain section of the agenda of the
Board of Supervisors for May 9, 1989, designated as Item L -
Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to
each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1
through 8, inclusive, as follows:
1. Minutes of Meeting - September 27, 1988, October
11, 1988, October 25, 1988.
2. Request for acceptance of Horsepen Mountain Drive
and Horsepen Mountain Circle into the Virginia
Department of Transportation Secondary System.
3. Resolution requesting approval of grant
application for Clean Valley Council.
4. Approval of resolution supporting the membership
of Craig County to the Mental Health Services of
the Roanoke Valley.
5. Acceptance of the following roads into the VDOT
Secondary System:
a. 0.24 miles of Quail Place
b. 0.12 miles of Meadewood Drive
c. 0.16 miles of Byers Road
d. 0.69 miles of Lakemont Drive
6. Authorization to request Va. Department of
Transportation Revenue Sharing funds to
construction road and drainage improvements.
7. Rese}t~~iea-exp~essi~g-app~e~a}-ef-~l~e-p~epeseel
mt~}~}-fs~ti}y-ele~e}epme~~s-3~~ew~-ss-6~ettse-Pe~~~e
Apa~tmeets-a~el-Hie~l~gete-Apa~tme~ts-
8. Acceptance of a sanitary sewer easement being
donated by K. Rae Martin and Sherry Martin, Lot
27, Block 3, Section 2, Kingston Park.
2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized
and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said
items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to
this resolution.
On motion of Supervisor Johnson with Item 7 removed for
discussion and a separate vote, seconded by Supervisor Nickens,
and upon the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Supervisor McGraw
Item 7 was denied by motion of Supervisor Robers,
seconded by Supervisor Nickens and upon the following recorded
vote:
AYES: Supervisors Robers, Nickens
NAYS: Supervisor Garrett
ABSTAIN: Supervisor Johnson
ABSENT: Supervisor McGraw
A COPY TESTE:
~•
Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
5/10/89
CC: File
Phillip Henry, Director of Engineering
Clean Valley Council
Craig County Board of Supervisors
Mental Health Services of the Roanoke Valley
Virginia Department of Transportation
Paul Mahoney, County Attorney
L/-=~
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, MAY 9, 1989
RESOLUTION N0. APPROVING AND
CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH
ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA
FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM L -
CONSENT AGENDA
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That that certain section of the agenda of the
Board of Supervisors for May 9, 1989, designated as Item L -
Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to
each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1
through 8, inclusive, as follows:
1. Minutes of Meeting - September 27, 1988, October
11, 1988, October 25, 1988.
2. Request for acceptance of Horsepen Mountain Drive
and Horsepen Mountain Circle into the Virginia
Department of Transportation Secondary System.
3. Resolution requesting approval of grant
application for Clean Valley Council.
4. Approval of resolution supporting the membership
of Craig County to the Mental Health Services of
the Roanoke Valley.
5. Acceptance of the
Secondary System:
a. 0.24 miles of
b. 0.12 miles of
c. 0.16 miles of
d. 0.69 miles of
following roads into the VDOT
Quail Place
Meadewood Drive
Byers Road
Lakemont Drive
6. Authorization to request Va. Department of
Transportation Revenue Sharing funds to
construction road and drainage improvements.
7. Resolution expressing approval of the proposed
multi-family developments known as Grouse Pointe
Apartments and Highgate Apartments.
~ i -8
8. Acceptance of a sanitary sewer easement being
donated by K. Rae Martin and Sherry Martin, Lot
27, Block 3, Section 2, Kingston Park.
2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized
and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said
items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to
this resolution.
. .14.5
September 27, 1988
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
Roanoke County Administration Center
3738 Brartibleton Avenue, SW
Roanoke, Virginia 24018
September 27, 1988
The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, met this day at the Roanoke County
Administration Center, this being the fourth Tuesday, and the
second regularly scheduled meeting of the month of September,
1988.
IN RE: CALL TO ORDER
Chairman Garrett called the meeting to order at 3:06
p.m. The roll call was taken.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Lee Garrett, Vice Chairman Richard
Robers, Supervisors Bob L. Johnson, Steven
A. McGraw, Harry C. Nickens
MEMBERS ABSENT: None
STAFF PRESENT: Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator; John
M Chambliss, Assistant County
Administrator for Human Services; John R.
Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator of
Community Services and Development; Don M.
Myers, Assistant County Administrator for
4 S September 27, 1988 ~ ~ ~,
Management Services; Paul M. Mahoney,
County Attorney, Mary H. Allen, Deputy
Clerk
IN RE: OPENING CEREMONIES
The invocation was given by the Reverend Wayne M.
Ayers, Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints. The Pledge
of Allegiance was recited by all present.
IN RE: REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF
AGENDA ITEMS
Item lA, Approval of funding for improvements to
Administration Center and Beautification Projects at Route 221-
419 intersection, and Item D7, authorization to settle litigation
with Valley Developers, were added to the agenda.
IN RE: NEW BUSINESS
1 A ~proval of funding for improvements to
Administration Center and Beautification Proiect at Routes 221-
419 intersection: Mr. Hodge reported that the Brambleton Avenue
Association would like to beautify the area at the triangle at
the intersection of Route 221 and 419. They have contacted
merchants along Brambleton Avenue and the Valley Beautiful
September 27, 1988 ~ ' ~ ~ ~~
organization. Valley Beautiful has authorized a $1500 grant
toward the improvement, and the Brambleton Avenue Association
will match that grant. They are requesting that Roanoke County
also match the grant. They will plant shrubbery and flowers and
work with VDOT to ensure they meet their requirements.
Present at the meeting were Bob Freeman and Ron Atkins
from the Brambleton Avenue Association. They presented the
landscaping plans for the beautification of the triangle. They
hope to leave the space in the middle available for a Christmas
Tree. Supervisor Garrett advised that Steve Musselwhite will
request approval from the Highway Department for the Christmas
Tree. Mr. Freeman also outlined other plans of the Brambleton
Avenue Association towards beautification of the all of
Brambleton Avenue.
Mr. Hodge advised that the County would install a water
line for sprinkling and minor maintenance will be handled by the
county staff.
Mr. Hodge also asked that the Board authorize several
beautification projects at the Administration Center including
signage, paving, and carpeting. This request was tabled at the
September 13th meeting. Supervisor Garrett directed a separate
vote on the Brambleton Avenue beautification project.
Supervisor Garrett moved to approve the allocation of
$3500 toward the Brambleton Avenue Association beautification
. .14~~8
September 27, 1988 L
project. The motion was seconded by Supervisor McGraw, and
carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
Supervisor McGraw moved to remove from the table the
request for additional improvements at the Administration Center.
The motion was seconded by Supervisor Garrett and defeated by the
following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors McGraw, Garrett
NAYS: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, Nickens
2 Approval of Emergency Operations Plan: Fire and
Rescue Chief Tommy Fuqua reported that the Commonwealth of
Virginia requires every locality to have in place an Emergency
Operation Plan and that the governing body adopt this plan in
order to receive Emergency Management Assistance funding. This
plan provides for the coordination of government during emergency
services such as the 1985 flood. Staff has coordinated this plan
with all emergency services operations in the county, and asked
for their input. Staff recommended approval of the Emergency
Operations Plan and authorize the County Emergency Services
Coordinator, the Fire and Rescue Chief to make required changes
to maintain the plan.
~. ;
r Se tember 27 1988 ~,~ 9
P . _
--
i
Supervisor McGraw moved to adopt the resolution
approving the plan.~• The motion was seconded by Supervisor
Robers, and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
RESOLUTION 92788-2 AUTHORIZING
ADOPTION OF EMERGENCY OPERATIONS PLAN
FOR ROANOKE COUNTY
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia as follows:
WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors is
greatly concerned with the health, safety, and well-being of its
citizens and desires that the best possible emergency services be
available to them; and
WHEREAS, the Commonwealth of Virginia Emergency
Services and Disaster Law of 1973 requires that each city and
county develop and maintain an Emergency Operations Plan which
addresses its planned response to emergency situations; and
WHEREAS, such a plan has been developed by County staff
in coordination with the Virginia Department of Emergency
Services with input from responsible local agencies.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Roanoke County
Board of Supervisors that, on the 27th day of September 1988, it
does hereby officially adopt the Roanoke County Emergency
150
~- .
September 27, 1988
C
C
Operations Plan, to include plans and procedures for both
peacetime and war-caused disasters.
3 Approval of Petty Cash Funds for Hazardous
Materials Crew: Director of Budget Reta Busher advised that
Roanoke County recently signed an agreement with the State of
Virginia to provide a regional hazardous materials response team
which requires the team to leave the area at a moment's notice to
respond to a problem. They are requesting a $100 petty cash fund
and a credit card for each of two vehicles to provide lodging,
meals and other emergency supplies.
In response to a question from Supervisor Johnson, Ms.
Busher responded that the credit limit would probably be $1000 or
$1500. In response to a question from Supervisor Nickens, Ms.
Busher advised the County would be reimbursed by the state for
incurred expenses. The petty cash fund and credit card will be
kept in a lock box in the vehicle. Team leaders will have access
to the cards and fund, and forms for responsibility will be
signed by team leaders.
Supervisor Nickens expressed concern about leaving the
card and fund in the vehicle because of the potential for
vandalism and theft.
Supervisor McGraw moved to approve the resolution and
staff recommendation with the stipulation that the credit card be
September 27, 1988 ~ ''~ ~'
limited to $1500. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Robers,
and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Garrett
NAYS: Supervisor Nickens
RESOLUTION 92788-3 ESTABLISHING PETTY CASH FUNDS
FOR THE HAZARDOUS MATERIALS TEAM
WHEREAS, the County of Roanoke is responsible for
staffing and training a Hazardous Materials Team, to service
Southwest Virginia; and
WHEREAS, the nature of this assignment requires that
the team respond to emergencies which may involve unanticipated
travel; and
WHEREAS, a fund needs to be established to pay for
expenses such as lodging, meals and supplies which result from
those emergency calls.
THEREFORE, be it resolved that the Board of Supervisors
of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby establishes two $100 petty
cash funds and authorizes two charge cards to pay for expenses
incurred by the Hazardous Materials Team in responding to
emergency calls in connection with its duties and assignments.
On motion of Supervisor McGraw, to approve with credit card
limit of $1,500.00, seconded by Supervisor Robers and carried by
the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, McGraw, Robers, Garrett
1.~ ;2
~'' ~ September 27, 1988
NAYS: Supervisor Nickens
4. Approval 'of 1989 Roanoke County Legislative Package
County Attorney Paul Mahoney reported that that the legislative
package has been revised to include recommendations from the work
session on September 13th. Clerk of Circuit Court Elizabeth
Stokes has suggested that an additional request from her office
be included. He advised that a breakfast meeting has been
scheduled for October 6, 1988 to provide the Board of
Supervisors, Constitutional Officer and School Board an
opportunity to discuss the package with area legislators.
Supervisor Johnson moved to approve the legislative
package with the addition requested by Mrs. Stokes. The motion
was seconded by Supervisor McGraw, and carried by the following
recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
5. Recruest for Suoport for the United Way Campaign
Assistant County Administrator Don Myers reported that the United
Campaign has now begun and Roanoke County's goal is $16,000.
This is a 6-1/2~ increase. Staff is requesting authorization to
participate in the United Campaign.
Supervisor Nickens moved to approve staff
recommendation. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Robers,
and carried by. the following recorded vote:
- 15::=;3
September 27, 1988
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
6. ACGeptanc~e of easements for installation of dry
hydrants in the Bent Mountain and Catawba areas• Fire and Rescue
Chief Tommy Fuqua advised that the 1985 bond issue included
funding for fire hydrants throughout Roanoke County in areas with
6 inch or larger water lines. Staff investigated the possibility
of installing "dry hydrants" on private property at ponds and
lakes, where fire trucks could hook up their hoses. Staff has
identified seven sites in the Bent Mountain and Catawba
communities. The property owners have agreed to donate to the
County fifteen (15) foot wide easements for the location and
construction of dry hydrants. Funding will come from the 1985
bond issue. Mr. Fuqua advised he will let the board members know
where the hydrants are located. Staff is recommending that the
board of Supervisors authorize acceptance of the easements for
the dry hydrants.
Supervisor McGraw moved to approve the staff
recommendation. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Garnett,
and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
~ 7. Direction to the Planning Commission and staff on
I
~ priorities for revision of the County Zoning Ordinance: Jon
1 ~'4
September 27, 1988
Hartley reported that the Planning Commission and staff are
seeking-direction from, the Board on the direction and priorities
for the staff to work on. This request is a result of a citizen
request that the minimum lot sizes in Catawba Valley be increased.
Supervisor McGraw added further information on this situation and
advised that if the staff waits until the complete zoning
ordinance is revised, there will already be small lot development
in the Catawba Valley.
Supervisor Nickens stated he had some concern that
changing the ordinance concerning lot sizes could have an adverse
affect on people who may have bought property many years ago with
the idea to subdivide in the future. Supervisor McGraw responded
that changing the ordinance would not preclude a property owner
from requesting a future rezoning. His concern is whole scale
development of certain areas.
Mr. Hartley advised that working on this change would
only affect the present priorities slightly. The commission and
staff have established signs as their first priority; the second
priority is commercial and high density residential development,
with rural development the third priority. The only change would
be to put rural development as first priority.
Alfred Powell, 3440 Franklin Street, advised he was an
affected property owner in the Catawba Magisterial District. He
felt this change would force the present property owners not to '
155
September 27, 1988
i
be able to utilize their property as they thought they could when
they purchased the.property. He felt this could also set
precedence in other districts and could possibly be
discriminatory.
Supervisor Johnson advised this action would only allow
a study of the issue. The Board could then support or oppose a
specific zoning change and a public hearing would allow
opportunity for citizen input.
Supervisor McGraw moved that the staff and Planning
Commission prepare revisions to the Zoning Ordinance for the
Catawba Planning Area to implement the Comprehensive Plan policy
guidelines for Rural Preserve land use with attention to
increasing minimum lot sizes and reducing overall density. The
motion was carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw,
NAYS: Supervisors Nickens, McGraw
7. Authoriza ion set le pending litigation, Valley
Developers Inc et al v Roanoke County• Mr. Mahoney reported
that on August 23rd, the Board authorizated condemnation of four
easements for the public sewer to the Nichols Estates
subdivision. The County Attorney's office has attempted to
negotiate a solution and now proposes a settlement with three of
the four property owners which are Valley Developers, James C.
and Judy B. Pate, and Barbara W. Croy. The settlement involves
156
September 27, 1988 ~
C
C
an increase of between. $700 and $800 over the appraised value,
but several thousand dollars less than the initial demands of the
plaintiffs. Staff is recommending settlement with payments of
$956.00 to Valley Developers, $200 to Pate and $1,300 to Croy.
Supervisor Nickens moved to approve the staff
recommendation. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Garrett,
and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
IN RE: REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS
A work session on space needs will be held on November
9, 1988.
IN RE: REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS
1 Recxuest for Public Hearing on October 11, 1988 to
borrow money in anticipation of taxes:
Supervisor Johnson moved to set the public hearing.
The motion was seconded by Supervisor McGraw, and carried by the
following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
'~ 5 7
September 27, 1988
IN RE : APPOINTMENTS •
Industrial Development Authoritv: Supervisor McGraw
nominated J. Richard Cranwell to serve a four-year term that will
expire September 26, 1992.
IN RE: REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS
Supervisor Johnson expressed sympathy on behalf of the
Board of Su ervisors u on the death of the wife of former Board
P P
of Supervisors chairman William Cundiff, and regrets that the
Board could not attend the funeral.
Supervisor Robers announced that there are at least 30
participants from the Roanoke Valley and 50 participants from
Northern Virginia who will attend Northern Virginia Day. He
thanked those who worked on this project.
Supervisor Robers also requested that the Board of
Supervisors appoint two members to serve on a committee to study
consolidation issues and establish public hearings for citizen
input. Supervisor McGraw stated he felt that a study of
efficiencies in the Roanoke Valley should be studied first,
rather than a study of consolidation. Chairman Garrett felt
5; 8' a~
September 27, 1988
this was premature until the County hears from the Grayson
Commission. The issue was taken under advisement.
Supervisor McGraw announced that a statistical profile
for the Blue Ridge Region is now available. He also advised he
had put forth his name in nomination for Second Vice President of
the Virginia Association of Counties. He also requested that
County Administrator Elmer Hodge describe the improvements he is
requesting at the Administration Center that was tabled at the
previous meeting. (See New Business for vote on removal of the
item from the table.)
Supervisor Nickens requested a staff report on what is
being done concerning the possibility of asbestos removal on
demolition permit.
Supervisor Nickens also moved that County Attorney Paul
Mahoney be directed to write to the Constitutional Officers and
respond in writing whether they wish to remain a part of Roanoke
County's Pay and Classification Plan and to abide by the rules of
the Employee Handbook, Grievance Procedure and other employee
:...
regulations; and that the responses be brought back to the Board
of Supervisors on October 25, 1988. The motion was seconded by
Supervisor McGraw and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
a
September 27, 1988 ~ ~ 5 9
IN RE: CONSENT AGENDA
Supervisor Johnson moved to approve the Consent Agenda
with Item 5 removed for discussion. The motion was seconded by
Supervisor McGraw, and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
RESOLUTION NO. 92788-9 APPROVING AND
CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH
ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA
FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM I -
CONSENT AGENDA
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That that certain section of the agenda of the
Board of Supervisors for September 27, 1988, designated as Item I
- Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as
to each item separately set forth in said section designated
Items 1 through 6, inclusive, as follows:
1. Resolution recognizing October 24, 1988 as
Community Action Day.
2. Approval of Resolution of Support for House Joint
Resolution establishing low cost health care
coverage for school and local government
employees.
16,~ 0
September 27, 1988
L
C
r
3. Request for acceptance of Byers Road into the Va.
Department of Transportation Secondary System.
4. Approval. of a Raffle Permit from the Cave Spring
High School PTSA.
5. Request- fer- appreprietroa- for- desrga- pl~ese- of
Spring-Ho~~or+-Reserdorr-
6. Transfer of roads from Va. Department of
Transportation to City of Salem.
2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized
and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said
items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to
this resolution.
On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor
McGraw with Item 5 removed for discussion. The motion carried
with the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
RESOLUTION 92788-9.a RECOGNIZING OCTOBER
24, 1988, AS COMMUNITY ACTION DAY
WHEREAS, the 27 Virginia Community Action Agencies have been
unfailing in their effort to offer a "hand up" to millions of
__ _- -_..
Virginians during the last 23 years; and
WHEREAS, Virginia Community Action Agencies have made
significant advances in assisting the poor to help themselves
September 27, 1988 1 6 1
through education, job training, improved housing,
weatherization, health and nutrition services, counseling, and
economic development; and
WHEREAS, Community Action in Virginia has been supported by
thousands of volunteers (six volunteers to every paid staff
person), serving on community action boards, advisory councils,
neighborhood organizations and working alongside staff; and
WHEREAS, Virginia Community Action Agencies have faithfully
carried out the mandate of the Economic Opportunity Act by
"strengthening of community capabilities for planning and
coordinating", "the better organization of services", innovative
approaches in attacking causes of poverty", "maximum feasible
participation of the poor", and "the broadening of the resource
bases";
WHEREAS, Virginia Community Action Agencies have established
themselves as national leaders in the development of innovative
statewide organizations and programs, such as the Virginia Water
Project, Virginia Cares, the Virginia Weatherization Program and
Project Discovery, Inc.; and
WHEREAS, Virginia Community Action Agencies by serving the
poorest residents of this great Commonwealth also have served all
her citizens;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT the Board of Supervisors
of Roanoke County, Virginia recognizes OCTOBER 24, 1988 as
September 27, 1988
16.2 ,,
.,
.""1~Y Action
Day throughout the County of Ro
Commonwealth of Virginia;
anoke and
That this be
an opportunit
Q°Wx~t Y for the citizenry of
Y t° reCpgnjie.the Roanoke
Place in 4reat accomplishments
relieving sufferin that have
g and helpin taketl
self-sufficient; g the poor to become
That all of us rededicate
ourselves to the great challenge
of building a stronger Virginia throw -
has "the o 9h ensuring that everyone
pportunity for education and
to work, and the o training, the opportunity
pportunity to live in decency at~d dlgnity~h
On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor
McGraw and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, McGraw, Nickens, Robers, Garrett
NAYS: None
RESOLUTION 92788-9,c REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF
BYERS ROAD INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1• That this matter came this day to be heard upon the
proceedings therein and upon the application for Byers Road a
section of road extending from Quail Place (Route 1888), 0.15
miles north of Trevilian Road (Route 1413), and extending in a
westerly and northerly direction 0.16 miles to a proposed
September 27, 1988 1 6 3
"T"-turnaround, pursuant to Section 33.1-72.1, Paragraph C-1 and
funded as a Rural Addition.
2. That this Board does guarantee the Commonwealth of
Virginia an unrestricted right-of-way of 50 feet with necessary
easements for drainage as recorded in Deed Book 792, Page 300,
dated June 15, 1968, and subsequent deeds of record in the
Roanoke County Circuit Court Clerk's Office.
3. That this Board does certify that this road was open to
public use prior to January 1, 1976, at which time this road was
open to and used by motor vehicles.
4. That this Board does certify that speculative interests
are not involved.
5. That said road known as Byers Road which is shown on a
certain sketch accompanying this resolution, be, and the same
is hereby established as a public road to become a part of the
state secondary system of highways in Roanoke County, only from
and after notification of official acceptance of said road by the
Virginia Department of Transportation.
On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor
McGraw and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, McGraw, Nickens, Robers, Garrett
NAYS: None
RESOLUTION 92788-9.b SUPPORTING THE
STUDY BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF HEALTH
~ s~4
r September 27, 1988
CARE COVERAGE ALTERNATIVES FOR SCHOOL
EMPLOYEES
WHEREAS, the 1987 Session of the Virginia General Assem-
bly established pursuant to House Joint Resolution Number 250 a
joint sub-committee to study health care coverage alternatives
for school employees; and
WHEREAS, the 1988 Session of the Virginia General Assem-
bly continued this joint sub-committee study pursuant to House
Joint Resolution Number 63; and
WHEREAS, this joint sub-committee heard considerable
testimony about wide disparities existing in health insurance
coverages provided and employer contributions made by local
school boards and the problems school employees are having with
this insurance coverage; and
WHEREAS, the problems of local constitutional officers
and employees of local government are similar to those of school
employees; and
WHEREAS, the joint sub-committee decided that these
issues also should be addressed.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the Board of Supervi-
sors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that said Board supports the
study by the joint sub-committee and urges the General Assembly
to provide uniform, meaningful, cost-effective health care cover-
age alternatives for school employees, local constitutional offi-
cers, and employees of local government.
_ ~
September 27, 1988 ~ f V
On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor
McGraw and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, McGraw, Nickens, Robers, Garrett
NAYS: None
IN RE: ITEM 5 (REQUEST FOR APPROPRIATION FOR DESIGN PHASE OF
SPRING HOLLOW RESERVOIR)
Supervisor Nickens expressed disappointment that the
Cities of Roanoke and Salem have changed their mind and decided
not to participate in the Spring Hollow Reservoir, and that they
now no longer feel the need for additional water that they
previously felt was necessary. He also suggested that the County
may wish to continue digging wells in east County for
transmission to southwest County.
Supervisor Nickens moved to approve the appropriation
for the design phase of Spring Hollow Reservoir. The motion was
seconded by Supervisor McGraw, and carried by the following
recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
IN RE: REPORTS
t~6 ~6 September 27, 1988
`.
Supervisor Robers moved to receive and file the reports
listed below. The motion was seconded by Supervisor McGraw, and
carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
1. Report on Recycling Project presented by Director
of General Services Gardner Smith
2. Reserve for Board Contingency
3. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance
4. General Fund Unappropriated Balance
IN RE: EXECUTIVE SESSION
At 4:20 p.m. Supervisor Garrett moved to go into
Executive Session pursuant to the Code of Virginia Section 2-1-
344 (a) (7) to discuss a legal matter with Fifth Planning
District Commission and (3) to discuss a real estate matter
involving the landfill. The motion was seconded and carried by
the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
IN RE: OPEN SESSION
September 27, 1988 ~ ~~• r ~: ~ 6
At 5:15 p.m., Supervisor Garrett moved to return to
Open Session. The motion was seconded and carried by the
following vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
IN RE: PROPOSED LANDFILL SITES
Supervisor Johnson moved to go forward with survey,
boring and testing of the potential landfill sites. The motion
was seconded by Supervisor McGraw, and carried by the following
recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
IN RE: RECESS:
At 5:20 p.m., Chairman Garrett declared a dinner
recess.
IN RE: EVENING SESSION
At 7:05 p.m., Chairman Garrett reconvened the meeting.
~~ 6 8 September 27, 1988
IN RE: PUBLIC HEARINGS
988-1 Petition of Accidental Dev lonmen
Corporation to rezone a 24.94 acre tract from
R-1, Residential to R-3, Residential to
construct multifamily dwellings located
immediately west of the intersection of
Colonial Avenue (Route 720) and Ogden Road
(Route 681) in the Cave Spring Magisterial
District.
APPROVED WITH PROFFERED CONDITIONS
Planner Dale Castellow reported that this area is
designated Development in the County's future land use plan map.
The significant impact factors focus on traffic and traffic
circulation. The proposed development should generate 1740
vehicle trips per day. Recent traffic counts show average daily
trips of 11,344 per day along Colonial Avenue north of Ogden Road
and 11,637 just south of Ogden Road. The petitioner has
proffered many conditions to mitigate potentially negative
impacts of the proposal. Mr. Castellow reviewed the conditions
offered by the petitioner. The Planning Commission recommended
approval of the rezoning request.
Attorney Don Wetherington was present representing the
petitioners. The proposal has changed from the first
presentation in that there are now no plans for any business or
office use on the project. There is an increase in the number of
~- - 16 9
September 27, 1988
apartments. He advised that the buildings are larger than
surrounding buildings ~to be able to preserve the green areas on
the property. There will be a single entrance at the traffic
signal. The three streets abutting the proposed project will
remain closed in keeping with the desires of the residences. He
pointed out that his figures show only 1450 vehicle trips per day
from the development as opposed to staff's projected 1740,
because most of the apartments would be one-bedroom apartments.
The following citizens spoke in opposition to the
proposed development because of the additional traffic, the
present 55~ turnover at Green valley School, there are too many
apartments in the area at the present time, and the addition of
more apartments added since the last rezoning request was heard.
1. Donald J. Potter, Sr., 3417 Greencliff Road S. W.
2. Craig S. McCelland
3. Ruth Mosely, 3425 Greencliff Road S. W.
4. Mark Siler, 3471 Old Towne Road
5. Howard Ward, 3539 Georgetown Road
6. Doug Doughty, 3534 Wedgewood
7. David Courey, 3434 Ashmeade Dr. S. W.
8. Herman E. Peters,
9. Cletus Broyles, 3911 Old Towne Road
10. Barbara Leaman, 3420 Ashmeade Drive S. W.
_~ 3 7 0
' September 27, 1988
Two citizens spoke in favor of the proposed development.
They were:
1• Howard Swank, 3434 Ashmeade, who supported the
petitioner's condition to allow the roads to remain closed.
2 Mark White, 6718 Oleander Circle,
Supervisor Robers reviewed the history of the project
and advised that he had attended many meetings on the proposed
development. He reminded those present that there were
objections voiced to the original development with businesses
located on the property because it was not known what businesses
would be located there or what traffic they would generate. The
petitioner has removed the businesses and made additional changes
to the conditions. The Board of Zoning Appeals agreed there was
a significant enough change to bring the rezoning request back to
the board. Supervisor Robers advised he is now ready to support
the proposed rezoning.
Supervisor Johnson asked Director of Engineering
Phillip Henry for the status on the upgrade of Colonial Avenue.
Mr. Henry responded that Colonial Avenue is not on the Six-Year
plan for improvement through 1994. The plan may be amended in
1990 and this project could be added and prioritized at that
time.
Supervisor Garrett advised that he felt an obligation
to listen to the needs and requests of the citizens, but that the
September 27, 1988 ~ ~ ~ 1
Board is also obligated by laws to vote based on the project.
His primary concern was the additional traffic that the
development would create, and the delays that would happen at the
Colonial-Ogden intersection. He could not support the rezoning
because of the traffic.
Supervisor Robers moved to approve the rezoning with
proffered conditions. The motion was seconded by Supervisor
McGraw, and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens
NAYS: Supervisor Garrett
FINAL ORDER
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDERED that the aforementioned
parcel of land which is contained in the Roanoke County Tax Maps
as Parcel 77.11-1-55 and recorded in Deed Book 959 and legally
described below, be rezoned from R-1 Single Family Residential
District to B-3 Multi-family Residential District
BE IT FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this order be
transmitted to the Secretary of the Planning Commission and that
he be directed to reflect that change on the official zoning map
of Roanoke County.
BEGINNING at corner 1, an iron pin
set on the western line of Colonial
17 '2
.; ~ September 27, 1988
avenue (having a right of way of
varying width) at the northeast
corner of property now or formerly
belonging to Charles A. Bushnell
and Nellie E. Busness; thence N.
440 58' 00" W. 519.26 feet to a
marked 12" hickory; thence N. 310
33' 00" E. 352.10 feet to a set
iron pin designated Corner 4;
thence N. 230 13' 07" E. 446.16
feet to a set iron pin; thence N.
230 45' 07" E. 370.00 feet to an
existing iron pipe; thence S. 500
43' S1" E. 1,237.80 feet along the
line of property now or formerly
owned by the City of Roanoke to a
set iron pin designated Corner 7 on
the western side of Colonial
avenue; thence (and with all
remaining courses along the western
side of Colonial Avenue) S. 310 30'
35" W. 205.68 feet to a point;
thence N. 580 29' 25" W. 9.00 feet
to a point; thence S. 310 30' 35"
W. 10.00 feet to a point; thence S.
580 29' 25" E. 9.00 feet to a
point; thence S., 310 30' 35" W.
81.00 feet to a point; thence N.
580 29' 25" W. 9.00 feet to a
point; thence S. 310 30' 35" W.
10.00 to a point; thence S. 580 29'
25" E. 9.00 feet to a point thence
S> 310 30' 35" W. 370.32 feet to a
point; thence with a curve to the
left, whose radius is 2,316.83 feet
and whose chord bearing and
distance are S. 270 35' 35" W.
316.50 feet, the arc distance of
316.75 feet to a point; thence S.
230 40' 35" W. 37.69 feet to a
point designated Corner 18; thence
with a curve to the left whose __
radius is 2,839.79 feet and whose
chord bearing and distance are S.
250 06' 08" W. 141.30 feet, the arc
distance of 141.32 feet to Corner 1
and the point of beginning,
containing in the aggregate 24.94
September 27, 1988 ~ 'f 7'3
r
acres and being designated as Tract
#1, all according to that certain
plat of survey entitled "Plat
Showing Property of Catherine
Aicaque~rre Ronk", dated April 25,
1988 by Buford T. Lumsden and
Associates, P.C., the details of
which plate are incorporated here
by this reference.
PROFFER OF CONDITIONS
1. Old Towne Road, Ashmeade Drive and Greencliff Road
will not be extended beyond their present terminuses at the
boundary of the referenced parcel or otherwise used for vehicular
access to or from the parcel.
2. No more than eleven dwelling units per acre will be
constructed on the land. No more than 264 dwelling units will be
constructed in the entire development. No more than 118 dwelling
units will contain as many as two bedrooms. No dwelling unit
will contain more than two bedrooms.
3. Access to Petitioner's intended development within
the parcel will be by a single entrance on Colonial Avenue 'at its
intersection with Ogden Road S. W.
4. Petitioner will include within its development a
storm-water detention pond sufficient to detain increased
surf ace-water runoff from the development following a "10-year
storm" with a release rate of the increased water no greater than
would follow a "2-year storm".
~.~ 7=4 September 27, 1988
5. For the 30 days following approval of rezoning,
members of the Roanoke Archaeological Society will have
permission to survey and examine the land for artifacts and other
items of archaeological significance. In keeping with
Petitioner's desire to preserve the greenery and natural
appearance of the land insofar as possible in connection with its
development, no tools or equipment other than hand tools may be
used for exploration except with petitioner's written consent to
the contrary. In its discretion petitioner's may request that
persons coming onto the land agree to hold the Petitioner and the
owner of the property harmless from claims arising from injury or
damage to such persons and their property. In addition, the
Petitioner agrees to make the following disposition of the two
older cabins situated on the land. Catherine V. Ronk, the
present owner of the land, in a contract with the Petitioner has
reserved the right for 90 days beyond closing the sale and
purchase of the land to remove the two cabins. If such 90-day
period expires without Mrs. Ronk's having commenced removal of
one or both cabins, or if Mrs. Ronk notifies Petitioner in
advance of the expiration of 90 days that she will not remove
either or both cabins, then Roanoke Archaeological Society will
have the right to remove whichever cabin or cabins that Mrs. Ronk
has chosen not to remove. Petitioner reserves the right,
however, to designate the period of time in which the Society
September 27, 1988 ~ ~ 7 5
must conclude removal, based upon such considerations as whether
the removal activities beyond a particular date will hinder
Petitioner's site preparation or other construction activity.
The Petitioner also reserves the right to require that Roanoke
Archaeological Society or other persons acting under its
direction or with its consent enter into agreement with
Petitioner in reasonable form to protect the Petitioner against
liability or cost that might arise from removal activities.
6. Development of the land in this parcel will be in
substantial conformity to the concept plan dated July 11, 1988 by
Buford T. Lumsden & Associates, P.C., a copy of which plan has
been submitted with Petitioner's application and petition.
However, Petitioner may elect to construct fewer buildings and
dwelling units than depicted on the concept plan.
7. An entrance marker sign and plaques, or some
combination thereof, may be placed at the entrance of the
property. The entrance marker sign, if used, will have no more
than two faces and will contain no more than 75 square feet of
surface area on any one face. No more than two plaques will be
used; each will have a single face containing nore more than nine
square feet of surface area on a face. For purposes of promotion
and lease-up during construction and for the one year following
construction, Petitioner may maintain a sign within the interior
of the property situated no closer than 50 feet to Colonial Ave.
~' ~ 7 6 September 27, 1988
and having a single face with a surface area of no more than 128
square feet to communicate such information as the name of the
community, office hours, a telephone number or numbers, rental
rates and other such information. This sign will remain on the
property no longer than one year from the completion of
construction. Other signs that identify buildings, regular
traffic, designate parking areas and the like that are not
visible or conspicuous from Colonial Avenue may be utilized
within the project without restriction.
8. Area lighting in the immediate vicinity of adjacent
residential properties will be focused toward the interior of the
project to avoid unnecessary glare and distraction to neighboring
residents. Freestanding light poles will not exceed 20 feet in
height, and the intensity of the lighting will not exceed 2-foot
candles on the ground beneath the lamp.
9. No building will be constructed closer than 100
feet to the Georgetown Park subdivision.
10. Buffering of the type described as "Type C-Option 2"
in section 21-92 (G) of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance will
be provided along the boundary of Georgetown Park and Greenwood
Forest where existing natural growth does not provide reasonably ____
similar buffering. "Type C-Option 2" buffering specifies a 25-
foot buffer yard with small evergreen trees (having an ultimate
,''
height of 15 feet or greater and planted each 15 linear feet) and
- _177
September 27, 1988
I
evergreen shrubs (having an ultimate height of 6 feet or greater,
at least 18 inches at time of plating and planted each five feet).
Planting will occur as soon as feasible in the course of
construction.
11. All dumpsters will be screened by solid wooden
fencing and landscaping. No dumpster will be closer than 75 feet
to Georgetown Park or greenwood Forest.
988-2 Petition of Chaparral Forest Associates to
rezone a 2.97 acre tract from R-1,
Residential to R-5, Residential to construct
townhomes, located on the north side of
Chaparral Drive (Route 800) approximately 300
feet west of its intersection with Beacon
Drive in the Cave Spring Magisterial
District. (CONTINUED FROM JUNE 28, 1988)
DENIED
Mr. Castellow reported that this petition is currently
designated Neighborhood Conservation on the Future Land Use Plan,
which discourages development of middle to high density
residential of 6 to 12 units per acre. The proposed density is
6.06 units per acre. He reviewed the proffered conditions. The
original public hearing was held on June 28th, but was referred
back to the Planning Commission for additional review. The
Planning Commission held a second public hearing on September 6th
1 7 9 September 27, 1988
to review the revised petition. Fourteen citizens were present
in opposition to the proposal. They were concerned with site
distance and the fact that two entrances would create a traffic
hazard. The Planning Commission recommended denial.
Ed Natt, attorney for the petitioner, pointed out that
originally the Planning Commission voted unanimously for denial,
but on September 6th, the vote was 3 to 2. The proposal is for
18 townhome units in four buildings on Chaparral Drive. The
units would be individually owned with common area. There would
be two entrances and the site distances required by the Va.
Department of Transportation have been met. He advised that the
major conflict remaining is with land use compatibility and site
layout. Mr. Natt advised that several other complexes in the
immediate area have higher density than the proposed development.
Concerning the site layout, he pointed out that at the Planning
Commissioner meeting, it was pointed out that under this land use
designation, there could be single family homes with driveways
backing into Chaparral which would be a more serious traffic
hazard. Mr. Natt stated that the other major factor was site
layout which did not include exceptional housing design or site
planning techniques, yet when the staff was asked what the
developer could do to improve this, there was no comment or
suggestions. The developer is willing to meet the exceptional
site techniques, but has not been told what they were.
17g
September 27, 1988
Two citizens were present to speak in opposition to the
proposed rezoning. Robert Turner, 3394 Kelly Lane was concerned
with traffic and safety. Wanda Manual, 4930 Bower Road was
opposed because she felt that the Land Use Plan should be adhered
to.
Supervisor Robers moved to deny the petition. The
motion was seconded by Supervisor McGraw, and carried by the
following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Garrett
NAYS: Supervisor Nickens
Supervisor Nickens asked for a report on exceptions that
have been made to the Land Use Plan and for an explanation and
description of "Exceptional housing design or site planning
techniques."
988-3 Petition of CBL Management, In c. requesting
rezoning from M-1 Industrial, to B-2 Business
of a tract containing 4.13___.acre_s to
construct a shopping center located -on the
west side of Merriman Ro ad (Route 613)
approximately 100 feet south of Starkey Road
(Route 904) in the Cave Spring Magisterial
District. (CON TINUED FROM JULY 26, 1988)
APPROVED WITH PROFFERED CONDITIONS
Jon Hartley advised that this rezoning involved
approximately 34,000 foot shopping facility which would include a
1:8 0
September 27, 1988
shopping market and five retail centers plus a future building
site shown on the concept plan. At the Planning Commission
hearing there were seven people in support and one in opposition,
who was concerned with potential drainage problems. The Planning
Commissioner recommended approval with proffered conditions.
Following continuance on July 26, 1989, the staff attempted to
respond to the board members questions.
Supervisor Johnson asked if there was any potential for a
prospect to locate manufacturing in this parcel. Mr. Gubala
responded that it would be possible if there were water and sewer
improvements. He further advised there were 720 acres in Roanoke
County zoned M-Manufacturing.
Rodney W. McNeil, 5920 Starkey Road, spoke in opposition
because of increased traffic p roblems with commercial property
and the downzoning from Manufacturing.
Dan Layman, Attorney for the petitioner, explained that
the property has not been been used for industrial purposes
because of a lack of water and sewer to accommodate industrial
use. Steve Tingle, CBL Associates, outlined the plans for the
property. They plan to only develop three. shops, including a
food market and expand to five shops if successful.
Supervisors Robers and Johnson both expressed concern at
downzoning M-zoned property when there is so little M-zoned
property available for industrial and commercial use.
September 27, 1988 ~ 8
i
Supervisor Robers moved to deny the petition. The motion
was seconded by Supervisor Johnson and defeated by the following
recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers
NAYS: Supervisors McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
Supervisor Nickens moved to approve the petition with
proffered conditions. The motion was seconded by Supervisor
McGraw and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisor Johnson, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: Supervisor Robers
FINAL ORDER
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDERED that the aforementioned
parcel of land which is contained in the Roanoke County Tax Maps
as Parcel 97.01-02-10 and recorded in Deed Book 1064, page 222
and legally described below, be rezoned from M-1 Light Industrial
District to B-2 General Commercial District
BE IT FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this order be
transmitted to the Secretary of the Planning Commission and that
he be directed to reflect that change on the official zoning map
of Roanoke County.
BEGINNING at a point on the west
line of Va. Sec. Rt. 613 corner to
182
..
-~~
September 27, 1988
,~
the property of Hubert E. Harris;
thence with the west line of Rt.
613 a curve to the right whose
chord is S 50 46' 13" W 175.31
feet an arc distance of 176.06
feet, and S 180 05' S0" W 244.42
feet to a point; thence a new line
S 77 0 03' W 485.0 feet to a point;
thence a new line N. 170 23' W.
312.0 feet more or less to a point;
thence with the outside line N 710
46' 30" E 695.0 feet to the place
of BEGINNING
PROFFER OF CONDITIONS
(1) the property will not be used for any of the
following purposes: convenience store, hotel, motel, theater,
assembly hall, motor vehicle dealership, funeral home, commercial
kennel, home for adults, hospital, nursing home, flea market, or
public dance hall.
(2) Access to Merriman Road (Route 613) will be limited
to not more than two points along the frontage of the property.
(3) No signs other than those advertising businesses
located on the subject property will be erected on the property.
(4) Petitioner will comply with applicable limitations
on size, number and location of signs and in addition agrees that
freestanding or pylon signs on the property will be limited to
either (a) one sign of not more than 200 square feet or (b) two
signs, one of not more than 140 square feet and the other of not
more than (80) square feet.
(5) Parking areas will be aesthetically treated with
landscaping and/or planting areas.
(6) All dumpster sites will be screened.
(7) The maximum height of light poles on the property
will be thirty feet. Lighting will be directed onto the parking
areas, and the maximum light level at the property line adjacent
to properties being used for residential purposes shall not
exceed one foot candle.
(8) Use of the property will include a supermarket of
25,000 square feet or more.
988-4 Petition of Richard and Tamara Carrell for a
Use Not Provided For Permit to operate a dog
boarding kennel and conduct obedience
training classes in addition to a residence
on a 3.079 acre tract located immediately
183
September 27, 1988
east of the terminus of Old Virginia Springs
Road (Route 667) in the Vinton Magisterial
District.
APPROVED WITH PROFFERED CONDITIONS
Supervisor Nickens advised that there was no opposition
to this petition, and there were no citizens present to speak.
Supervisor Nickens moved to grant the petition. The
___ motion was seconded by Supervisor McGraw, and carried by the
following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
FINAL ORDER
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDERED that the aforementioned
parcel of land which is contained in the Roanoke County Tax Maps
as Parcel 99.00-1-33.1 and recorded in Deed Book 1218 and legally
described below, be issued a Use Not Provided for Permit for the
purpose of a residence and boarding kennel of up to fifteen dog
runs, obedience training classes in fenced area, limited hours
and days.
BE IT FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this order be
transmitted to the Secretary of the Planning Commission and that
he be directed to reflect that change on the official zoning map
of Roanoke County.
. 184
September 27, 1988
BEGINNING in the center of the
branch at Corner "1" on the east
line of .the Ollen B. Hartman 2 1/16
acre tract, said point being
approximately 30 feet east of the
centerline of Va. Hwy. Rt., No. 667
(30 feet wide); thence with four
new lines thru the property of Carl
L. Meador and Edna H. with four new
lines thru the property of Carl L.
Meador and Edna H. Meador, S. 470
09' 04" E. 133.21 feet to an iron
pin at Corner "2"; thence S. 810
53' 43" E. 36.79 feet to an iron
pin at Corner "3"'; thence N. 780
41' 53" E. 509.66 feet to an iron
pin at Corner "4"; thence S. 90 49'
48" E. 174.96 feet to an iron pin
at Corner "5" on the northwesterly
line of the formerly Hubert & Edith
Kelly property thence with the
same, following the existing fence,
S. 540 14' 03" W. 197.18 feet to a
30 inch red oak at Corner "6";
thence S. 670 33' 18" W. 65.69 feet
to a 10 inch hickory at Corner "7"
thence S. 740 34' 43" W. 24.20
feet to a 24 inch red oak at Corner
"8"; thence N. 770 37' 41" W.,
passing a 36 inch white oak on line
at 287.34 feet, in all 303.41 feet
to Corner "9" in the centerline of
a branch; thence down in the branch
as it meanders, the following 10
courses and distances, N. 250 45'
40" E. 11.47 feet to corner "10"'
thence N. 300 57' 21" W. 11.69 W.
38.51 feet to Corner "12" thence S.
810 50' 02" W. 33.57 feet to corner
"13"; THENCE N. 810 43' 09" W.
27.99 feet to corner "14"; thence
S. 600 45' 25" W. 11.69 feet to
Corner "15"; thence N. 620 19' 06"
W. 18.92 feet to Corner "16";
thence S. 790 26' 45"W. 15.10 feet
to corner "17"; thence N. 50 51'
12" W. 19.39 feet to Corner "18";
~18 5
September 27, 1988
thence N. 160 09' 43" W. 14.40 feet
to Corner 19 on the easterly right
of way line of Route 667; thence
with same N. 170 02'03" E. 70.88
feet of COrner 20 in the centerline
of the branch, thence leaving the
right of way of said highway and
with the center of the branch the
following three courses and
distances, N. 350 35'43" E. 41.388
feet to Corner 21 thence N. 220 N
39' 23" E. 27.91 feet to Corner 22;
thence N. 110 21' 42" w. 25.29 feet
to Corner 12, the place of
beginning and containing 3.079
acres as shown on plat prepared by
T. P. Parker & Son, Engineers and
Surveyors, Ltd., dated December 26,
1984.
PROFFER OF CONDITIONS
A. Site Restriction
(1) No kennel will be constructed within 150 feet of the
property line, as of April 5, 1988, between our property and that
of Bonnie McCutcheon.
(2) No business usage of any sort will be within 150 feet
of the property line described in conditional A-1.
(3) No kennel will be constructed within 200 feet of
Route 667.
B. Improvements
(i) There will be no more than 15 kennels built for
commercial purposes; with a total of not more than 27 dog
residents on the premises.
(2) The kennel facility and training area will be fenced
to ensure that no dogs may escape.
(3) There will be one sign which will be wooden and non-
illuminated.
(4) A kennel silencer will be installed and maintained -
in the commercial kennel.
(5) The parking area for the training classes will be at
least 50 feet from Route 667.
(6) The training area will be at least 200 feet from
Route 667.
•_~
September 27, 1988
(7) Parking for the kennel will be located behind the
kennel at the top of the hill.
(8) Pine trees to be planted and maintained on 7 ft.
centers along Old Virginia Spring Road adjacent to parking lot.
C. Operations
(1) All dogs on this property for boarding or training
purposes will be on a leash or confined by a secure fence.
(2) There will be no more than 3 hours of group classes
a day.
(3) There will be no group classes on Sundays.
(4) There will be no more than 15 dogs in group
obedience classes. No training will occur after 9:00 p.m.
(5) Dogs in the training area for exercise will not
exceed 5 and will always be supervised by applicant or employee
of applicant. No dogs will be in the training area at anytime
unless f or training or for exercise. When any dog is in the
training area for training, no dogs shall present for exercise,
and when any dog is in the training area for exercise, no dogs
will be present for training. ~
988-5 Petition of Daniel R. Duffy to rezone a 0.343
acre tract from B-1 Business to B-2 Business
to construct. a dry cleaning business located
on the west side of Brambleton Avenue (Route
221) approximately 1,000 feet north of its
intersection with Colonial Avenue (Route 720)
in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District.
APPROVED WITH PROFFERED CONDITIONS
No citizens were present to speak on this petition.
Supervisor Garrett moved to grant the petition with
proffered conditions. The motion was seconded by Supervisor
Nickens, and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None ~
f
187
September 27, 1988
FINAL ORDER
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDERED that the aforementioned
parcel of land which is contained in the Roanoke County Tax Maps
as Parcel 76.20-02-06 and recorded in Deed Book 1244, page 1377
and legally described below, be rezoned from B-1 Business
District to B-2 Business District
BE IT FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this order be
transmitted to the Secretary of the Planning Commission and that
he be directed to reflect that change on the official zoning map
of Roanoke County.
~ sECINNING at an icon on the westerly side o[ U.S. Route 221. appco:la~ately
488.5 [eet northerly o! !ts intersection with Old Cave Spcinq Road: thence
M. 53. 71. 20• N. ]2.22 feet to an icon: thence S. 87. Ot' 20' M. 26.52 feet
to an Icon; thence N. 80. 18' 20' N. 75.56 feet to an icon; thence S. 79•
59' 25' N. X1.97 feet to an icon; thence N. 31. 30' 19' E. 107.53 feet to
an lcon~cebac: thence M. 06. 02' 15' 6. 100.00 [eet to an a:istlnq P.[. Nall:
thence S. 29• ]3' 17• s. 26.6 Leet to an icon; thence 3. S9. 41' 38' E.
56.37 feet to an icon oa the westerly side of O.S. Route 221: thence along
the westerly side o! 0.8. Route 221. S. 16. 29' 00• N., passing an icon at
5].52 lest, a total of 80 feet to an icon, the place o[ sOGINNINC and being
Nev Tract C, containing O.]43 sere, asshovn on sucvey [oc Jaaes suck Plu~binc
L eeatinq t R. Nl111a^ Reid sulldec, Inc.. by salsec and Associates, Inc.
Land Surveyors, originally dated August 27, 1986 and updated Naceh 25, 1988,
to which sucvey swce particular reference !s hereby made.
BEZNC a part o[ the aase property conveyed to James suck Plusbing i
seating and R. Nillia~ Reid sulldec. Inc. by deed o[ correction, dated
August 28. 1986, recorded !n the Clerk's O[tice of the Circuit Court toc
the County oC Roanoke, Virginia in Deed cook 124, page 177.
PROFFER OF CONDITIONS
(1) To be constructed in substantial conformance with
Conceptual Plan.
(2) The total square footage of all signs on the subject
property is limited to a maximum of 100 square feet.
(3) No billboards will be erected on the property.
8 8 - September 27, 1988
988-6 Petition of The Secretary of the Roanok_
('o ~n y Planning Commission to amend the Land
Use. Plan: Future Land Use map designation
from Core to Principal Industrial of a tract
of~~Land located north of the intersection of
US 460 and Cloverdale Road (Route 604), east
of Kingsmen Road (Route 608) and south of the
border of the counties of Roanoke and
Botetourt in the Hollins Magisterial
District.
Planner Jon Hartley advised that this amendment is in
response to the Tweeds proposal and will make the Land Use Plan
consistent with the project. There was no one present to speak.
Supervisor Johnson moved to grant the petition. The
motion was seconded by Supervisor Nickens, and carried by the
following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDERED that the aforementioned
parcel of land which is contained in the Roanoke County tax Maps
as Parcels 40.01-1-17 and 40.01-1-18 and recorded in Deed Book
1033, page 627 and Deed Book 249, page 707 and legally described
below, be redesignated from Core to Principal Industrial.
All properties incorporated within the boundaries of
Route 460, Rote 604, Route 608, and the Roanoke
' ~~'6 9
September 27, 1988
I ,
County/Botetourt County line in the Hollins Magisterial
District.
988-7 Petition of the Roanoke County Board ~,
Sux~ervisors to rezone a portion of a 24.78
acre tract from R-E Residential Estates to M-
1, Industrial for a buffer yard and
construction of a mail order distribution
center, located immediately east of
Cloverdale Road (Route 604) and Kingsmen Road
(Route 608) in the Hollins Magisterial
District.
APPROVED WITH PROFFERED CONDITIONS
Planner Jon Hartley presented the staff report and
advised this property will be used as a buffer yard for the
Tweeds distribution center. There was no one in opposition.
Supervisor Johnson moved to approve the petition with
proffered conditions. The motion was seconded by Supervisor
McGraw, and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
FINAL ORDER
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDERED that the aforementioned
~ parcel of land which is contained in the Roanoke County Tax Maps
as Parcel and recorded in Deed Book and legally described
.~. ~; g p
September 27, 1988
below, be rezoned from RE Residential Estates District to M-1
Light Industrial District
BE IT FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this order be
transmitted to the Secretary of the Planning Commission and that
he be directed to reflect that change on the official zoning map
of Roanoke County.
Beginning at s point on the northerly right of way line of VA Route 604, said point
being N 48' 49' S1' W, 251.79 feet =ran the intersection point of the right of way
lines of US Route 460 and VA Route 604; thence along said right of way line.N 48' 49'
51' W, 98.21 feet to a point; thence N 20' 28' 15• W, 70.05 feet to a point, being the
intersection point of the right of way lines of VA Route 604 and VA Route 608; thence
along the easterly right of way of VA Route 608 N 00' 41' 39' E, 152.20 feet to a
point= thence N 03' 48' 09• E, 542.93 feet to a point; tl~nce W OS' 18' 09' E, 534.07
feet to a point= thenoe with a curve to the right having a radius of 590.00 feet, an
Feret ~ th of 14.51 feet, and a chord bearing and length of N 12' 19' 09• E, 144.15
point= thence N 19' 20 09 E, 81.0 feet to a point on the approximate
boundary of Roanoke Ox:nty and Botetourt County; thence leaving said right of way and
followirg said boundary line S 61' E, 101.41 feet to a point; thence leaving said
boundary line S 19' 20' 09• W, 63.97 feet to a point; thence with a curve to the left
having a radius of 490.00 feet, an arc length of 120.01 feet and a chord bearing and
lenth of S 12' 19' 09• W, 119.71 feet to a point) thence S OS' 18' 09• N, 534.07 feet
to a point? thenoe S 03' 48' 09" W, 512.93 feet to a point; thence S 00' 41' 39• W,
281.28 feet to the place of beginning.
PROFFER OF CONDITIONS
(1) Screening and buffering, type E, option 2
(2) Route 608 will not be used for industrial access
(3) An earthern berm will be provided to screen the
loading dock area.
IN RE: FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES
1 . O ~~ Hance amends nn ChaptP*- ~ 17, PrnrUrPmAnt Codrg,
Article II Competitive Pro uram nr Division 4 Small
Pur haSEac
~oncernina small purchasPS County Attorney Paul Mahoney
presented the staff report explaining that this ordinance
eliminates restrictions on small purchasing procedures.
X91
September 27, 1988
Supervisor Nickens expressed concern about the
possibility of abuse of the less restrictive procedures, such as
dividing a request into smaller parts to avoid letter quotations.
Following discussion of the issue, Supervisor Nickens
moved to deny the first reading of the ordinance. There was no
second and the motion died.
Supervisor McGraw moved to approve first reading of the
ordinance. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Robers, and
carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Garrett
NAYS: Supervisor Nickens
2 Ordinance acc@,ptina an offer and authorizing the
conveyance of a ricxht of way and easement to Appalachian Power
Company - Vista Forest:
Supervisor Nickens moved first reading of the ordinance.
The motion was seconded by Supervisor McGraw, and carried by the
following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
3 Ordinance authorizing the acauisit~~n of 4.199
f n_cres f rpm Salem Stone Corporation and James M. Turner Estate:
c
County Attorney Paul Mahoney advised that he had been informed
1 ~: 2
September 27, 1988
that Salem Stone Corporation may be willing to donate
property and therefore, staff does not have the fiscal im actthis
costs to fund this ac p and
quisition.
Supervisor Nickens moved to approve first reading of
the ordinance subject to costs and source of funds being
available by second reading. The motion was seconded by
Supervisor McGraw, and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
IN RE: CITIZENS COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS
1. Richard Evans, 4443 Cordell Drive, Roanoke, Va.
spoke concerning his oppositiop,to the hi h
g penalty deposit for
having his water turned off because of non payment. He was also
concerned that this deposit was not returnable unless he moved
from Roanoke County, and that there was also a penalty for late
payment. After discussion of the problem, Supervisor McGraw
aa~r.~ ari»* *h° C°vr-r~- Attornay and county Admi,nistrrtor study the
ordinances in comparison to other localities and utilities and
report back on October 11, 1988.
2. Ms. Angela Webb, representing the Clearbrook Civic
League spoke in opposition to the proposed landfill site 677-9RR
September 27, 1988 ~~ 3
located off Route 220. She also presented a petition signed by
those in the community who were opposed to this site.
3. Glenn E. Prather, 7244 Back Creek Road, also spoke
in opposition to the proposed landfill site near Clearbrook.
IN RE : - AIIJOURNMENT
At 9:55 p.m., Supervisor Johnson moved to adjourn the
meeting. The motion as seconded by Supervisor McGraw and carried
by a unanimous voice vote.
Lee Garrett, Chairman
October 11, 1988
~~~
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
Roanoke County Administration Center
3738 Brambleton Avenue, SW
Roanoke, Virginia 24018
October 11, 1988
The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, met this day at the Roanoke County
Administration Center, this being the second Tuesday, and the
first regularly scheduled meeting of the month of October, 1988.
IN RE: CALL TO ORDER
Chairman Garrett called the meeting to order at 3:05
p.m. The roll call was taken.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Lee Garrett, Vice Chairman Richard
Robers, Supervisors Bob L. Johnson, Steven
A. McGraw
MEMBERS ABSENT: Supervisor Harry C. Nickens
STAFF PRESENT: Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator; John
M Chambliss, Assistant County
Administrator for Human Services; John R.
Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator of
Community Services and Development; Don M.
Myers, Assistant County Administrator for
Management Services; Paul M. Mahoney,
~'~ ~ ,5 October 11, 1988
County Attorney, Mary H. Allen, Deputy
Clerk;
IN RE: OPENING CEREMONIES
The invocation was given by the Reverend Bob Alderman,
Shenandoah Baptist Church. The Pledge of Allegiance was recited
by all present.
IN RE: REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF
AGENDA ITEMS
County Administrator Elmer Hodge requested that Item D-
2, Approval of Funding for improvements to the Administration
Center be postponed to November 9, 1988.
County Attorney Paul Mahoney requested that Item H-3,
Ordinance authorizing the acquisition of land from Salem Stone
Corporation and James M. Turner be postponed to October 25, 1988.
IN RE: PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS AND AWARDS
1. Proclamation declaring the week of October 9
through 15. 1988 as Fire Prevention Week in Roanoke County:
Chairman Garrett read the proclamation and presented it to Neil
Daugherty, Assistant Fire Marshal. Supervisor McGraw moved
1fl6
October 11, 1988
adoption of the proclamation. The motion was seconded by
Supervisor Johnson and carried by a unanimous voice vote.
2 PrPSentatiori of Financial Award and Sa.fPfiv Award
Chairman Garrett announced that Roanoke County has been awarded a
Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting
from the Government Finance Officers Association. Finance
Director Diane Hyatt was present to receive the award. Ms. Hyatt
~t
recognized Financial Analyst Vincent Copenhaver as the individual
most responsible for the award.
Chairman Garrett also recognized Risk Manager Bob
Jernigan for receiving the Most Improved Safety Performance from
the Virginia Municipal Liability Pool.
IN RE: NEW BUSINESS
1 Approval to change Board of Supervisors mee in
da e to November 9, 1988:_
Supervisor Johnson moved to change the meeting date
because of the Election Day holiday and to advertise the change.
The motion was seconded by Supervisor McGraw, and carried by the
following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Garrett
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens
~ X19 ~
October 11, 1988
2 Approval of fundinct for improvements to the Roanoke
r~»ntv Administration Center: Postponed to November 9, 1988.
3 Appropriation of funds for the safekeepingt of
Roanoke County securities: County Treasurer Alfred Anderson
reported that the General Assembly has approved legislation
requiring that securities purchased by the County must be kept by
another institution than the one where the securities were
purchased. Bids were received and First American Bank was
selected for safekeeping of the securities. The annual cost will
be approximately $2700. Cost for fiscal 1988/89 will be
approximately 2000.
Supervisor Garrett moved to appropriate the funds. The
motion was seconded by Supervisor McGraw, and carried by the
following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Garrett
NAYS: None
ABSEMT: Supervisor Nickens
4 Approval of a policy to finance Public
WorksImprovements: Mr. Mahoney advised that this policy will
authorize development of an ordinance to assist in the financing
of public works improvements such as construction of sanitary or
storm water sewers, construction, replacement or enlargement of
sidewalk, water lines, sanitary or storm water sewers, and
installation of street lights. Cost reimbursement may come
;198
October 11, 1988
through utility billing or other means agreed to by the citizens.
Another alternative ~is to impose a local tax assessment on
abutting property owners. Mr. Mahoney presented the various
alternatives available for reimbursement. If the Board approves
the policy, the County Attorney will draft an ordinance
concerning the various alternatives. These alternatives are
set out by State Code provisions.
Diane Fair, 5502 Highfield Road spoke in support of
this policy because of the need in her neighborhood for a
sanitary sewer line.
Supervisor McGraw asked if the 60~ support from the
citizens for an improvement was set out in State Code. Mr.
Mahoney advised that was correct, but the Board could establish a
higher percentage such as 75~ support, or by two-thirds vote of
the Board of Supervisors. Supervisor McGraw felt that there
should be a higher percentage in support of an improvement,
especially in rural areas.
Supervisor Johnson moved to approve the staff
recommendation to adopt the policy. The motion was seconded by
Supervisor Robers.
Following discussion of how the various alternatives
would operate, Supervisor McGraw requested that the motion be
amended to change the percentage of support to 75~ rather than
60~. Supervisor Johnson advised that he would rather wait until
1~.9
October 11, 1988 '~
the ordinance is drafted to determine the percentage. Supervisor
Johnson asked that the first reading be postponed to the first
meeting in November and that Utility Director Clifford Craig be
present.
Supervisor Johnson amended his motion to approve the
policy and go forward with the public hearing and reading of
ordinance. The motion carried by the following vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Garrett
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens
5 Request from Roanoke County School Board for
authorization to participate in the Governor's Educational
Technology Initiative Procurement and Financincr Proctram: Dr.
Bayes Wilson, Superintendent of Schools, requested permission to
participate in this program which will incorporate more
technology in the curriculum. He introduced Dr. Viars who
reported that Roanoke County is eligible for $161,400 of
subsidized equipment. The additional amount of $580,400 will be
borrowed through the VPSA and paid from the school operating
budget. They will buy computers and printers to be used as
i n s t r u c t i o n a l t o o l s i n t h e c l a s s r o o m.
In response to a question from Supervisor Robers, Dr. Viars
stated that $179,000 is already in the budget to purchase new
equipment.
October 11, 1988
2 0 0 :M
Supervisor Johnson moved to adopt the resolution. The
motion was seconded by Supervisor McGraw, and carried by the
following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Garrett
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens
RESOLUTION 101188-3 AUTHORIZING THE
SIGNING OF THE MEMORANDUM OF
AGREEMENT BETWEEN ROANOKE COUNTY THE
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION TO AUTHORIZE
PARTICIPATION IN THE GOVERNOR'S
EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY INITIATIIVE
PROCUREMENT AND FINANCING PROGRAM
WHEREAS, the Roanoke County School Board recognizes the need
to expand the learning experiences now available through
technology to its students, and
WHEREAS, the Roanoke County School Board is eligible for
approximately $161,400 in susbsidized technological equipment
through the Governor's Educational Technology Initiative
Procurement and Financing Program, and
WHEREAS, the Governor's Educational Technology Initiative
Procurement and Financing Program provides a vehicle for the
purchase and financing of microcomoputers, satellite recelvCL
dishes, and associated equipment at a substantial savings to
participating localities, and
Ootober il, 19a0
201
the Roanoke County School Board needs the
of the Roanoke County Board of Su aPProval
pervisors to participate in this
program;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT
RESOLVED by the Board of
of Roanoke County that it does hereb au Supervisors
Y thorize the signing of
the Memorandum of Agreement between the County and the De artm
of Education authoriain P ent
9' Part3c3patior~ ire bA• oov~~hrr~~
Educational ?ec?~no2ogy rn#t#t~t#ve ~-rarsW~rp~~,aq~, ~l~,p~ ~~~1M~p1~~~,
Program for the purchase and financing of approximately $161,400
of subsidy eligible equipment (and $580,400 nonsubsidy eligible
.equipment).
On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor 1
McGraw and carried by the following recorded vote: )
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, McGraw, Robers, Garrett
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens
IN RE: FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES
1 Ordinance accep ina an offer for and au horizincr
the sale of 55 acre, more or less, in the Southwes Industrial
Park: Economic Development Director Timothy Gubala reported that
October 11, 1988 ~ O
an offer had been received from Nelson Brumfield to locate a
cabinet shop in Southwest Industrial Park.
In response to a question from Supervisor Johnson, Mr.
Gubala advised there are no covenants to protect the present
occupants in the industrial park, but he could prepare convenants
of this type. No one was presents to speak to this ordinance.
Supervisor Robers moved first reading of the ordinance.
The motion was seconded by Supervisor McGraw, and carried by the
following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Garrett
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens
2 Ordinance authorizing the acquisition of four
nitarv sewer easements to facilitate extension of public sewer
to the Nichols Estate subdivision :_ Mr. Mahoney advised that this
would authorize the acquisition of three of the easements for
extension of the sewer. No one was present to speak to this
ordinance.
Supervisor Robers moved first reading of the
ordinance. The motion was seconded by Supervisor McGraw, and
carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Garrett
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens
2 ~ ~ October 11, 1988
IN RE: SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES
1, Ordinance amending Chapter 17 Procurement Code,
Article II. Competitive Procurement, Division 4. Small Purchases
concerning small purchases: No one was present to speak to this
ordinance.
Supervisor Garrett moved to adopt the ordinance. The
motion was seconded by Supervisor McGraw, and carried by the
following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Garrett
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens
ORDINANCE 101188-5 AMENDING CHAPTER 17.
PROCUREMENT CODE, ARTICLE II.
COMPETITIVE PROCUREMENT, DIVISION 4.
SMALL PURCHASES CONCERNING SMALL
PURCHASES
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That Division 4. Small Purchases of Article II.
Competitive Procurement of Chapter 17. Procurement Code be
amended and reenacted as follows:
Section 17-90. Purchases of less than five hundred dollars.
2 0.4
October 11, 1988
(a) This section shall apply to purchases of less than
five hundred dollars ($500).
(b) A using department or agency may make purchases ~
utilization of a blanket order system to be developed and
distributed by the purchasing agent The purchasing anent has
the authority to make purchases from vendors of choice so long as
the purchase price does not exceed five hundred dollars _15500).
contract requirements shall not be artificially divided so as to
me within the provisions of this section. After- reeespt- a€- e
purel~ese- requssstsen- frem- tl~e- uss~g- elepertmeat- er- egeaep;- et
least- three- f3}- telepl~ene- quetatseas- shell- be- abbe~neel,-- r~l~eneder
passable,-- fer- tl~e- purel~ese .-- - A- telepl~eae- quetetsen- farm- shell-19e
eempleteel- ltsttng: - - Hete,-- Item- Hesersptsen; - Qnsntrtp,-- Pdeme- e€
Eampet~y,-- ~r~elr~selt~el- 6rrrrng- Qnete-- Prierng,-- berm- excel- Helsnerp
Sel~eelule-- - Tl~e- tetel- ef- sll- stems- pr~rel~sse- frem- tl~ls- requtsttle~
sl~euld- eet- exeeed- fsve- hundred- elellers- x$580} .-- -Where- preetseel-
stenel$rdssed- s~~re~terses- end- exsstsng- eer~treets- shaulel- be- used- to
setssfp-these-ree~ests-
Section 17-91.
Purchases between five hundred and twentp-fsve- - - - hundred
dollars five thousand dollars.
(a) This section shall apply to purchases between five
hundred dollars ($500) and awe- thausertel- free- hursdreel- dallers
20~
October 11, 1988
-589} five th
~~ ousand dollars (55.00 0) in value. The
,
administratively make purchase s of
purchasing agent may
pr~rel~ase up to $10, 000 .
~Yj) After receipt of a purchase requisition from the
using department or agency. at least three (3) telephone
quotations shall be obtained, whenever possible, for the purchase._
A telephone quotation form shall be completed listing: Date.
Item. Description. Ouantitv, Name of Companv. Individl?al Giving
Pricing. Term, and Deliverv Schedule The total of all
i ms purchases from this requisition shall not exceed five
thousand dollars (55. 00~. Pt~rel~eses- shell- be- eeeempltsl~eel
tl~ret~gl~- tl~e- t~se- ef- et- least-three- ~3}-letter- gt~etetlens; - wl~eneeer
pesslble-- - A- letter- eltsetet~en- ls- a- written- ree~est- sent- ta- et
least- three- -E3}- ~renelars- wltl~- e- speelfleel- replp- elate- anal- tlme-
~l°its- is- tl~e- Mast- eleslreble- metheel- ef- eeelt~lring- neeesserp- Items
anal-sl~aulel-be-r~seel-when-preper-planning-e}laws-sttf f terent-tame-
~e}- - Tl~e- t~se- ef- letter- eit~etetians- ree~ires- eeleejt~ete
time- far- greperetier~,-- melling,-- reeelpt- anal- ewerel; - generellp- twe
~~}- ar-three- ~3}- weeks- from- tl~e- reeeipt- ef- tire- ree~isitian-- - X411
elttetetiens- reeeiveel- after- tire- replp- elate- anal- time- ere- nan-
respansi~re-anal-Bennet-be-eansielereel-
~d}- - Reeftiests- far- letter- est~atetiens- ere- issneel- bp- tl~e
purei~esing- agent-- - ~o- initiate- tige- letter- ematetlen; - tl~e- user
elepertment- sl~etslel- submit- a- eampleteel- reeielsitlan- ta- tl~e
October 11, 1988 Z,~Q V
purel~gsrng- agent,-- me}~drng- a- first- ef- pessib~e- venders-- rf
ever~eb~e-
~Prtion 17-91.1. Purchases between five thousand and ten
thousand dollars.
(a) This section shall apply to purchases between five
housand dollars and ten tho usand dollars (510.000) in val ue.
The pur chasing agent may ad ministratively purchase up to ten
thousand dollars ($10,000)_
( ) Pu rchases shall be accomplished through the us e of
at leas t three (3) letter quota ions, whenever po ssible A
letter q uotation is a written request sent to at leas t three (3)
_vendors with a s pecified repl y date and time This is the most
desirabl e method of acquiring necessary items and sho uld be used
when proper planning allows sufficient time.
~ ) The use of letter quotations requires adec~ tae
ime for preparation, mailing, receipt- and award. generally two
or three weeks from re ceipt of the requisition All rn~~tations
received after the re ply date and time are non-responsive and
Cannnt hP considered.
( ) Request f or letter quotations are issued by the
purchasing agent To initiate the letter guotati^n~- the user
department should submit a completed requisition to the
2 0.7 •:~ October 11, 1988
~_
purchasing anent, including a list of possible vendors, if
available.
2. This amendment shall be in full force and effect
from and after its passage.
On motion of Supervisor Garrett, seconded by Supervisor
McGraw and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, McGraw, Robers, Garrett
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Supervisors Nickens
2._ Ordinance accepting an offer and au horizing the
convevance of a right-of-wav and ea ment to Appalachian Power
companv - Vista Forest• No one was present to speak to this
ordinance.
Supervisor Johnson moved to adopt the ordinance. The
motion was seconded by Supervisor Robers, and carried by the
following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Garrett
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens
ORDINANCE 101188-6 ACCEPTING AN OFFER AND
AUTHORIZING THE CONVEYANCE OF A
RIGHT-OF-WAY AND EASEMENT TO APPALACHIAN
POWER COMPANY - VISTA FOREST
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
October 11, 1988
208
1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.01 of
the Charter of Roanoke County, the subject property has been de-
clared to be surplus and is being made available for other public
uses, i.e. a public utility; and
2. That pursuant to provisions of Section 18.04 of the
Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading concerning the convey-
ance of the hereinafter-described right-of-way and easement was
held on September 27, 1988. A second reading on this matter was
held on October 11, 1988. This easement is located across a
water tank lot located in Section 1, Block 1, Forest Edge Subdivi-
sion; and
3. That the conveyance of a right-of-way and a fifteen
(15) foot easement from the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, to Appalachian Power Company for the sum of
one dollar ($1.00) is hereby approved; and
4. That all proceeds from the sale of this real estate
are to be allocated to the capital reserve of the County.
5. That the County Administrator is authorized to exe-
cute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke
County as are necessary to accomplish the conveyance of this
right-of-way and easement, all of which shall be upon form
approved by the County Attorney.
On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor
Robers and carried by the following recorded vote:
209
October 11, 1988
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, McGraw, Robers, Garrett
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens
3 Ordinance authorizing the acquisition of 4 199
acres from Salem Stone Corporation and James M Turner Estate:
Postponed to October 25, 1988.
IN RE: PUBLIC HEARINGS AND ADOPTION OF RESOLUTIONS
1 Public Hearing in accordance with Section 15 1-
171 1 of the Co de of Virginia of 1950, as amended on the issuance
f not to excee d $4 million shor t-term revenue anticipation notes
of the County for the purpose of meeting casual deficits in the
revenue of the County and in anticipation of taxes and other
revenue of the County: Finance Director Diane Hyatt reported the
County is anticipating a temporary cash flow shortage during the
month of October because of literary loans due. This $4 million
borrowing is in anticipation of taxes that are due. Four bids
were received and staff is recommending awarding the bid to First
Virginia Bank. All local financial institution were contacted to
submit a bid.
No one was present to speak at the public hearing.
October 11, 1988
210
2 Approval of Resolution authorizing the issuance and
le of Revenue Anticipation Notes in the amount of up to S4
million and acceptance of bid for said note•
Supervisor Garrett moved to adopt the resolution. The
motion was seconded by Supervisor Johnson, and carried by the
following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Garrett
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens
RESOLUTION 101188-7 AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE AND
SALE OF THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA, REVENUE
ANTICIPATION NOTES IN THE AMOUNT OF UP TO $4 MILLION
AND ACCEPTING THE BID FOR AND APPROVING THE INTEREST
RATE FOR SAID NOTES, UPON CERTAIN TERMS AND
CONDITIONS
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors (the "Board") of the
County of Roanoke, Virginia (the "County") has determined that it
is necessary and expedient to borrow $4 million and to issue its
revenue anticipation notes in an amount not to exceed $4 million
(the "Notes") to meet casual cash flow deficits of the County;
and
WHEREAS, the County has solicited bids from a limited
number of potential investors for the purchase of such notes; and
WHEREAS, the Board now desires to set the interest rate
on the Notes and to award the Notes to the low bidder.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of
Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows:
2 ~ a~
October 11 1988 ~
1. The Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County
determines that it is advisable to contract a debt and issue and
sell the Notes in an aggregate principal amount of up to $4
million. The issuance and sale of the Notes are authorized. The
proceeds from the sale of the Notes shall be used to meet casual
cash flow deficits of the County.
2. The Board determines that it is in the best
interest of the County and the Commonwealth of Virginia to accept
the bid of First Virginia Bank to purchase the Notes for a
purchase price equal to the aggregate principal amount thereof.
3. The County Administrator and Treasurer are
authorized to execute and attest, respectively, in form approved
by the County Attorney, appropriate documentation, including a
note or other written evidence of borrowing, necessary for a
taxable $4 million irrevocable line of credit to be repaid at a
rate of interest of 7.464 per annum payable at maturity on
December 15, 1988. The County may prepay the Note at any time
without penalty.
4. The full faith and credit . of the County are pledged
to the payment at maturity of the principal of and interest on
the Note. Unless other funds are lawfully available and
appropriated for the timely payment of the Note, there shall be
levied, without limitation as to rate or amount and collected in
accordance with law, annual ad valorem tax on all taxable
~~2
October 11, 1988
property in the County subject to local taxation sufficient to
provide for payment of the principal of and interest on the Note
at maturity.
5. The officers and agents of the County are
authorized and directed to take such further action as may be
necessary or convenient in connection with the execution of the
Note or other documentation, and all actions previously taken by
such officers and agents in connection therewith are ratified and
confirmed, including requests for disbursements and providing for
appropriate repayments.
6. The appropriate officers and agents of the County
are authorized and directed to immediately cause a certified copy
of this Resolution to be filed with the Circuit Court of the
County pursuant to Section 15.1-199 and 15.1-212 of the Code of
Virginia of 1950, as amended.
7. This Resolution shall take effect immediately.
IN RE: REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS
Supervisor McGraw presented a report from Seattle on
recycling. He asked Gardner Smith to contact personnel in
Seattle to investigate why their recycling percentage is higher
than Roanoke County.
213..
October 11, 1988
~pervisor Robers reported on the Northern Virginia
Trip. He advised that 30 people from six jurisdictions in the
Roanoke Valley attended and 80 were present from Northern
Virginia. He thanked those who worked on the project.
Supervisor Robers requested that a letter from the Board of
Supervisors be sent to George Mason University expressing
appreciation for their work on this project.
~iipervisor Garrett thanked Supervisors McGraw and
Robers for their work on the Roanoke Valley Cooperation Committee.
He announced that the annual VML conference was very productive.
IN RE: REPORT FROM COUNTY ATTORNEY
Mr. Mahoney announced that the Virginia Supreme Court
had refused to hear the appeal from the Committee on
Constitutional Law concerning the legality of the sale of the old
courthouse in Salem.
IN RE; CONSENT AGENDA
Supervisor Johnson moved to approve the Consent
Resolution. The motion was seconded by Supervisor McGraw, and
carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Garrett
October 11, 1988
2~~
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens
RESOLUTION N0. 101188-8 APPROVING AND
CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH
ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA
FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM L -
CONSENT AGENDA
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That that certain section of the agenda of the
Board of Supervisors for October 11, 1988, designated as Item L -
Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to
each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1
through 5, inclusive, as follows:
1. Confirmation of committee appointment to the
Industrial Development Authority and Parks and
Recreation Commission
2. Acceptance of water and sewer service for Green
Ridge Village.
3. Request for approval of a Raffle Permit for the
Green Valley Elementary School PTA.
4. Acceptance of a resolution from Roanoke City
Council declining to participate in the Spring
Hollow Reservoir Project.
5. Acceptance of water line easement being dedicated
by Sovran Bank,
2, That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized
and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said
2 '~ b
October 11, 1988
items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to
this resolution.
IN RE: REPORTS
Supervisor Robers moved to receive and file the
following reports. The motion was seconded by Supervisor McGraw,
and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Garrett
NAYS: None
1. Report on estimate of assessed values of
residential and commercial properties located in the flood plain.
2. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance
3. General Fund Unappropriated Balance
4. Board Contingency Fund
5. Update on proposed County Street Standards
6. Report on Utility Ordinances
IN RE: CITIZENS COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS
Alfred W. Powell, 3440 Franklin Street spoke concerning
the proposed street standards. He opposed several aspects
including water runoff resulting from plant mix and curb and
gutters; the cost of plant mix and c
urb and gutter, the lot sizes '
October 11, 1988
21 6 ..
which would apply to the street standards; and the lack of
coverage and public awareness concerning .this proposed standard.
IN RE: EXECUTIVE SESSION
At 4:15 p.m Supervisor Garrett moved to go into
Executive Session pursuant to the Code of Virginia Section 2.1-
344 (a) (7) to discuss potential litigation concerning landfill
and (2) to discuss potential litigation concerning landfill and
(2) to discuss Board of Zoning Appeals. The motion was seconded
by Supervisor Johnson, and carried by a unanimous voice vote.
IN RE; OPEN SESSION
At 4:48 p.m., Supervisor Johnson moved to return to
Open Session. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Garrett and
carried by a unanimous voice vote.
IN RE: ADJOURNMENT
At 4:49 p.m. Chairman Garrett declared the meeting
adjourned.
Lee Garrett, Chairman
October 25, 1988 ~ ~ ~ . .r
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
Roanoke County Administration Center
3738 Brambleton Avenue, SW
Roanoke, Virginia 24018
October 25, 1988
The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, met this day at the Roanoke County
Administration Center, this being the fourth Tuesday, and the
second regularly scheduled meeting of the month of October, 1988.
IN RE: CALL TO ORDER
Chairman Garrett called the meeting to order at 3:06
p.m. The roll call was taken.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Lee Garrett, Vice Chairman Richard
Robers, Supervisors Steven A. McGraw, Harry
C. Nickens
MEMBERS ABSENT: Supervisor Bob L. Johnson
STAFF PRESENT: Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator; John
M Chambliss, Assistant County
Administrator for Human Services; John R.
Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator of
Community Services and Development; Don M.
Myers, Assistant County Administrator for
2 ~ 8: '' October 25, 1988
i
Management Services; Paul M. Mahoney,
County Attorney, Mary H. Allen, Deputy
Clerk
IN RE: OPENING CEREMONIES
The invocation was given by the Reverend Jeffrey
Butcher, Bonsack United Methodist Church. The Pledge of
Allegiance was recited by all present.
IN RE: REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF
AGENDA ITEMS
Item D-4, Authorization to Enter into a contract for a
landfill consultant and a resolution authorizing the Landfill
Board to assign a contract to Roanoke County, was added.
Item I-10 under Consent Agenda was deleted.
IN RE: NEW BUSINESS
1 Reaue t for fundinct for a Public Information
Officer position: County Administrator Elmer Hodge reported that
the Public Information Officer position had been discontinued
several years ago because of budget constraints. Because of the
October 25, 1988 ~ ~ 9
projects coming up in the future, he requested that the position
be reinstituted and funding be allocated for six months beginning
January 1, 1989. Funding will also be included for Roanoke
county Todav, the county newsletter.
Supervisor Garrett requested that the position be
titled information officer or information services officer
because it would be more indicative of the work.
In response to a question from Supervisor Robers, Mr.
Hodge reported that all cities and most larger counties now have
a public information officer. Supervisor Robers stated he did
not support adding more personnel and asked how many new
personnel have been added. Mr. Hodge responded that nine
personnel have been added this year.
Supervisor McGraw advised that he was willing to
support a tax increase to fund necessary positions, salary
increases and education.
Supervisor McGraw moved to reinstate the position and
appropriate the necessary funding of $46,500 for fiscal year
1988/89. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Garrett, and
carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett,
NAYS: Supervisor Robers
ABSENT: Supervisor Johnson
f., ~ ~~
October 25, 1988 ;_
c
2 Suggested prioritization for additional drainage
maintenance projects: Engineering Director Phillip Henry
reported that in February the drainage maintenance projects were
approved by the Board. Nine additional projects have now been
added at a cost of $45,000 and staff is requesting that they be
added to the priority list.
Supervisor Nickens moved to approve the staff
recommendation. The motion was seconded by Supervisor McGraw,
and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett,
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Supervisor Johnson
3 Request from School Board for appropriation for
Pxpansion of the Regional Assessment Center at the Roanoke County
Occupational School: Mr. Garland Kidd, Roanoke County Schools
advised that the County Schools applied for a grant to expand the
Regional Assessment Center by purchasing equipment to computerize
the assessment process. The $65,437 grant was approved in August.
The money must be appropriated to make the improvements and will
then be reimbursed by the state.
In response to a question from Supervisor Nickens,
Finance Director Diane Hyatt stated that the County can file for
the reimbursement on a monthly basis so this should not create a
_ 2~~
October 25, 1988
cash flow problem. Supervisor Nickens asked the County Attorney
to investigate why the State can wait 60 days to reimburse money.
Supervisor Nickens moved to adopt the resolution. The
motion was seconded by Supervisor McGraw, and carried by the
following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett,
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Supervisor Johnson
RESOLUTION 102588-3 AUTHORIZING THE
ACCEPTANCE OF A GRANT FROM THE
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA FOR THE ROANOKE
COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD TO FUND A REGIONAL
ASSESSMENT CENTER AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY
OCCUPATIONAL SCHOOL
WHEREAS, the County School Board of Roanoke County
adopted a resolution on October 13, 1988, requesting the Board of
Supervisors of Roanoke County to appropriate $65,437.00 to the
school operating budget for fiscal year 1988-89 for expansion of
the Regional Assessment Center at the Roanoke County Occupational
School (RCOS); and
WHEREAS, a vocational assessment program is currently
available at the Roanoke County Occupational School (RCOS) for
appropriate vocational training and/or work experience or job
placement for special education, disadvantaged, and at-risk stu-
dents; and
2 L 4 ?• October 25, 1988
WHEREAS, the Virginia Department of Education has
granted to the Roanoke County School System 100 percent reim-
bursed funding in the amount of $65,437.00 for the 1988-89 school
year to expand the regional assessment center at RCOS through the
purchase and installation of additional equipment, training, and
in-service for designated staff, and review of referral proce-
dures, testing schedule, and communication system.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervi-
sors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That there is hereby appropriated to the County
School Board of Roanoke County the sum of $65,437.00 to the
school operating budget for fiscal year 1988-89 from the capital
facilities account for the expansion of the regional assessment
center at RCOS.
2. That this appropriation would be utilized for capi-
tal improvements to the RCOS. These capital improvements would
expand the regional assessment center at RCOS through the pur-
chase and installation of additional equipment, training for
staff, and review of procedures, schedules and the communications
system.
3. That this appropriation would be subject to reim--
bursement from the Commonwealth of Virginia in like amount.
Staff shall seek reimbursement as expeditiously as possible in
order to minimize the cash flow effects on the County.
?~
October 25, 1988
4. That this resolution shall take effect immediately.
On motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by Supervisor
McGraw and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors McGraw, Nickens, Robers, Garrett
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Supervisor Johnson
4 Authorization to enter into a contrac for a_
Landfil~ ~'^n~»ltant• Mr. Hodge explained that the County has
begun the siting of a new landfill because of some questions
concerning the legality of the Landfill Board handling this
responsibility. The staff has met with other participating
localities and the Landfill Board to assign their contract with
Olver Inc. to the County. The staff recommended that the Board
of Supervisors authorize the County to enter into a contract with
Olver for siting of the landfill and preparation of the necessary
applications. Also, the Board should approve a resolution
authorizing the Landfill Board to assigning the contract to
Roanoke County and authorizing the expenditure of funds.
Supervisor Nickens moved to authorize the County to
enter into the contract and to adopt the resolution. The motion
was seconded by Supervisor Robers, and carried by the following-
recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
2~~;4 • October 25, 1988
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Supervisor Johnson
RESOLUTION 102588-5 AUTHORIZING THE
ROANOKE VALLEY REGIONAL SOLID WASTE
MANAGEMENT BOARD TO ASSIGN A CONTRACT TO
ROANOKE COUNTY, RATIFYING CERTAIN ACTIONS
TAKEN TO DATE, AND AUTHORIZING THE
EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS
WHEREAS, the City of Roanoke, the Town of Vinton, and
the County of Roanoke entered into an agreement dated July 29,
1975, providing for the operation of a regional sanitary landfill
and establishing the Roanoke Valley Regional Solid Waste Manage-
ment Board (the "Board"); and
WHEREAS, said Board has entered into a certain contract
with Olver Inc. to assist in the siting of a new regional solid
waste disposal facility; and
WHEREAS, said Board has raised certain questions con-
cerning its authority to undertake certain activities relating to
the siting of such a new facility; and
WHEREAS, the participating local government jurisdic-
tions which are the parties to this agreement desire to address
certain issues regarding the siting of a new regional solid waste
disposal facility.
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
225
October 25, 1988
1. That the Roanoke Valley Regional Solid Waste Manage-
ment Board is hereby authorized to assign that certain contract
between it and Olver Inc. for professional engineering activities
concerning the siting of a new regional solid waste disposal fa-
cility or facilities in Roanoke County to Roanoke County, except
for those portions of the contract related to the waste to energy
study and the recycling study.
2. That the expenditures by said Board for this con-
tract and for those actions undertaken by it in connection with
the siting of said facility to date are hereby authorized, rati-
fied, confirmed and approved. The Board is further authorized and
empowered to take such actions as may be required in administra-
tion of the waste to energy and recycling elements of the Olver
Inc. contract and to make future expenditt`~res with regard to
these contract elements.
3. That the Board is authorized to reimburse-Roanoke
County for its payment to Olver Inc. of fees, expenses, and
charges arising under the assigned contract. Roanoke County is
authorized to receive as a credit toward its obligation to pay
the Board the charge based on the per ton rate for refuse.. .:garbage
or other material delivered by its vehicles to the regional land-
fill pursuant to Section 10 of the Agreement, for any financial
obligation it incurs under the assigned Olver Inc. contract.
2 2~ 6
October 25, 1988
4. That the County Administrator is authorized to exe-
cute such documents, upon form approved by the County Attorney,
and take such actions as may be necessary to accomplish the pur-
poses of this Resolution. The Deputy Clerk is directed to mail a
copy of this Resolution to the City of Roanoke and the Town of
Vinton.
5. That this resolution shall take effect only upon
the adoption of a resolution of the same substance and effect by
each of the parties to the Roanoke Valley Regional Landfill Agree-
ment dated July 29, 1975.
On motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by Supervisor
Robers and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
IN RE:
Supervisors McGraw, Nickens, Robers, Garrett
None
Supervisor Johnson
REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS
1 Request for Public Hearincx on November 22, 1988 to
revise business license rates and ordinance•
Supervisor Nickens moved to set the public hearing and
directed that the County Attorney send notification to various
October 25, 1988
-_-~
industries and businesses that the public hearing has been
scheduled. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Garrett, and
carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Supervisor Johnson
IN RE: APPOINTMENTS
C rt Service Unit Advisory Council/Youth and Familv
Services Advisory Board: Supervisor Nickens requested that these
appointments been removed from the agenda until a decision is
made on continuation of the committee. County Attorney Paul
Mahoney was directed to contact Michael Lazzuri concerning the
disposition of the committee and any funds which the committee
holds, and report back at the second meeting in December.
IN RE: REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS
,g~pervisor Robers announced that the school system has
received bids for contracting of food services. He asked staff
to set up a meeting between Supervisor Nickens, Supervisor Robers
and school personnel to review and discuss the bids.
`~2 2 ;8 October 25, 1988
Supervisor Robers also moved that the Board of
Supervisor approve contacting Roanoke City Council to begin
discussion and study of a potential government reorganization.
There was no second and the motion died.
~QPrvisor McGraw stated he would prefer an independent
study be done to determine what may be the most efficient way of
providing services to the citizens. This information should be
made public before any reorganization discussions take place.
~ipPrvisor Nickens announced that a water committee for
Mt. Pleasant Civic League had sent permission from the property
owners for site access to site 35 to begin study of that site for
a proposed landfill.
,supervisor Garrett moved that staff contact the
Virginia Department of Transportation and request assistance on
behalf of Bethel AME Church that the church not be affected by
the construction and relocation of Route 221. The motion was
seconded by Supervisor Nickens, and carried by the following
recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Supervisor Johnson
IN RE: CONSENT AGENDA
229
October 25, 1988
Supervisor Nickens moved to adopt the Consent
Resolution with Item 10 removed. The motion was seconded by
Supervisor McGraw, and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Supervisor Johnson
RESOLUTION N0. X02588-6 APPROVING AND
CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH
ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA
FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM I -
CONSENT AGENDA
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That that certain section of the agenda of the
Board of Supervisors for October 25, 1988, designated as Item I -
Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to
each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1
through 11, inclusive, as follows:
1. Acknowledgment from the Virginia Department of
Transportation that the following roads have been
taken into the Secondary System:
a. 0.19 miles of Wing Commander Drive
b. 0.18 miles of Grape Tree Lane
c. 0.06 miles of Village Lane
d. 0.36 miles of County Lane
2. Authorization for sewer reimbursement agreement to
Ernest Clark.
234
October 25, 1988
3. Credit and reimbursement agreement for Water Main
Installation to Royal Buick/Isuzu.
4. Approval of reimbursement with Fralin & Waldron
for installation of a sanitary sewer interceptor
along Buck Mountain Road.
5. Approval of credit and agreement with Fralin &
Waldron for installation of water facilities along
Buck Mountain Road.
6. Approval of a Raffle Permit for Mason's Cove
Elementary School PTA.
7. Approval of a Raffle Permit for Penn Forest
Elementary School PTA.
8. Authorization of lease/purchase arrangements for
one-arm refuse truck.
9. Authorization of lease/purchase for 30 school
buses.
10. At~~hertaetioa- be- nse- ~lqe- E}e8r19raek- Ftre- eael
Reserve-bt~ilelzng-by-tl~e-Barites-Atsxrlterp-
11. Acceptance of sanitary sewer easement donated by
Fralin and Waldron Inc. - Trent's Trace.
2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized
and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said
items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to
this resolution.
Item I-10 was deleted from the Consent Resolution.
On motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by Supervisor
McGraw, and upon the following recorded vote:
AYES: Su ervisors Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
p r
NAYS: None
2 3 1~
October 25, 1988
ABSENT: Supervisor Johnson
RESOLUTION ~0 588-6.i AUTHORIZING THE
LEASE/PURCHASE ACQUISITION OF THIRTY
SCHOOL BUSES, ACCEPTING THE OFFER
THEREFOR AND APPROVING THE INTEREST RATE,
UPON CERTAIN TERMS AND CONDITIONS
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of the County of
Roanoke has determined that it is necessary and expedient to
acquire thirty school buses through a lease/purchase agreement;
and
WHEREAS, the County has solicited offers for `said
lease/purchase acquisition; and
WHEREAS, the Board now desires to establish the inter-
est rate and to award this lease/purchase agreement; and
WHEREAS, said acquisition of school buses was autho-
rized and approved in the 1988-89 fiscal year budget.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the Board of Supervi-
sors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County
determines that it is advisable to enter into a lease/purchase
agreement to acquire thirty school buses for the Roanoke County
School Board.
2. That the Board determines that it is in the best
interests of the County to accept the offer of Citicorp of North
America for this lease/purchase agreement.
23- 2~
October 25, 1988
3. That the County Administrator upon form approved by
the County Attorney is hereby authorized to execute the appropri-
ate documents for this lease/purchase agreement in the principal
amount of $1 million over a seven year period at an interest rate
of 7.23.
4. That this lease/purchase agreement is authorized
pursuant to the provisions of Section 14.01 of the Roanoke County
Charter and that this lease/purchase agreement is subject to
annual appropriations by the Board of Supervisors.
5. That the officers and agents of the County are here-
by authorized and directed to take such further action as may be
necessary or convenient in connection with this transaction and
that all other actions previously taken by such officers and
agents in connection therewith are ratified and confirmed.
6. That this resolution shall take effect immediately.
On motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by Supervisor
McGraw and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors McGraw, Nickens, Robers, Garrett
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Supervisor Johnson
IN RE: REPORTS
. i
October 25, 1988 ~ 2.3 3
Supervisor Nickens moved that the following reports be
received and filed.~~ The motion was seconded by Supervisor
Robers, and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Supervisor Johnson
1. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance
2. General Fund Unappropriated Balance
3. Board Contingency Fund
4. Accounts Paid for September 1988
IN RE: FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES
1 Ordinance amending and reenactincr Chapter 5,
Animals and Fowls of the Roanoke County Code by the addition of
Section 5 71, Quarantine in event of animal bites• Mr. Mahoney
explained that this amendment will bring the Roanoke County code
in compliance with the State Code amendments. No one was present
to speak to this ordinance.
Supervisor Nickens moved to approve first reading of
the ordinance. The motion was seconded by Supervisor McGraw, and
carried by the following recorded vote:
L ~ ~ October 25, 1988
. -~
AYES: Supervisors Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Supervisor Johnson
IN RE: SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES
1. Ordinance accepting an offer for an authorizing the
gale of .55 acre more or less in the Sou hwest Indu rial Park
Mr. Mahoney requested that this item be deleted because of some
problems concerning acreage.
Supervisor Nickens moved to delete the item. The
motion was seconded by Supervisor Garrett, and carried by the
following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Supervisor Johnson
2. Ordinance authorizing the acquisition of four
~anitarv sewer ea ments o facili atP ex nsion of public sewer
to the Nichols Esta subdivision• Mr. Mahoney reported that
originally this was begun as condemnation proceedings. However,
negotiations for acquisitions were successful and this ordinance
will authorize the acquisitions. No one was present to speak.
:j 23-5
October 25, 1988
Supervisor Nickens moved to adopt the ordinance. The
motion was seconded~by Supervisor Robers, and carried by the
following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Supervisor Johnson
ORDINANCE 102588-7 AUTHORIZING THE
ACQUISITION OF FOUR (4) SANITARY SEWER
EASEMENTS TO FACILITATE EXTENSION OF PUBLIC
SEWER TO THE NICHOLS ESTATES SUBDIVISION
~ BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That pursuant to provisions of Section 18.04 of the
Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading concerning the acquisi-
tion of the hereinafter-described real estate was held on October
11, 1988. A second reading on this matter was held on October
25, 1988. This real estate consists of easements across the pro-
perty of Valley Developers Inc. (Tax Map No. 86.08-4-9), James C.
Pate and Judy B. Pate (Tax Map No. 86.08-4-28), Barbara W. Bova
Croy (Tax Map No. 86.08-4-29), and Mabel Naff Bowman (Tax Map No.
86.08-4-32) adjacent to the Nichols Estates subdivision in the
Windsor Hills Magisterial District; and
2. That the acquisition of easements from Valley Devel-
opers Inc., James C. Pate and Judy B. Pate, and Barbara W. Bova
~~.2 3 6 October 25, 1988
ti
~-
~-
Croy to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County for $2,456.00
is hereby authorized and approved and the acquisition of an ease-
ment from Mabel Naff Bowman to the Board of Supervisors of Roa-
noke County in the amount of $1,800.00 is also hereby approved;
and
3. That the County Administrator is authorized to exe-
cute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke
County as are necessary to accomplish the acquisition of this
property, all of which shall be upon form approved by the County
Attorney.
On motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by Supervisor
Robers and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors McGraw, Nickens, Robers, Garrett
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Supervisor Johnson
3. Ordinance authorizing the acgt?;sition of 4 199
acres from Salem one Co~porat~~n and 7 mes M Turner EStatP
Mr. Mahoney advised that Salem Stone is willing to donate this
property to the County and the only cost will be $10.00.
Supervisor Garrett moved to adopt the ordinance. The
motion was seconded by Supervisor McGraw, and carried by the
following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
October 25, 1988 ~ ~.~ 7
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Supervisor Johnson
ORDINANCE 102588-8 AUTHORIZING THE
ACQUISITION OF 4.199 ACRES FROM SALEM
STONE CORPORATION
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That pursuant to provisions of Section 18.04 of the
Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading concerning the
acquisition of the hereinafter-described property was held on
September 27, 1988. A second reading on this matter was held on
October 25, 1988. The property is a 4.199-acre tract more
particularly described as Roanoke County Tax Map No. 63.00-1-13
and located near the end of Virginia Secondary Route 778 in the
Catawba Magisterial District.
2. That the acquisition of the property from Salem
Stone Corporation in the amount of ten dollars ($10.00) is hereby
authorized and approved; and
3. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized
and directed to execute such documents and take such actions on
behalf of Roanoke County as are necessary to accomplish the
acquisition of said property.
On motion of Supervisor Garrett, seconded by Supervisor
McGraw and carried by the following recorded vote:
23..8:
October 25, 1988
AYES: Supervisors McGraw, Nickens, Robers, Garrett
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Supervisor Johnson
IN RE: CITIZENS COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS
1. Alfred W. Powell, Jr., 3440 Franklin Street, spoke
concerning the change in minimum lot sizes from 1/3 acre to 5
acres in agricultural and rural estates. He opposed the change
because it would hinder the freedom of the property owner who
purchased the property under one set of rules. These rules were
then changed, hindering his right to develop as he chooses.
Supervisor McGraw and Mr. Hodge both pointed out that
zoning changes are made to protect property owners even though
they may sometimes adversely affect some.
2. Supervisor Nickens moved to contribute $10,000 from
the Board Contingency Fund to Total Action Against Poverty to be
used as matching funds for a HUD Grant for a transitional living
center. Fund would not be made available until there is a signed
agreement between HUD and TAP. The motion was seconded by
Supervisor McGraw, and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
2 3 9 .=
October 25, 1988 I
~ --
ABSENT: Supervisor Johnson
IN RE: EXECUTIVE SESSION
At 4:20 p.m., Supervisor Garrett moved to go into
Executive Session pursuant to the Code of Virginia, Section 2.1-
344 (a) (1) to consider a personnel matter. The motion was
seconded by Supervisor McGraw, and carried by the following
recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Supervisor Johnson
IN RE: OPEN SESSION
At 4:59 P.M., Supervisor Nickens moved to return to
Open Session. The motion was seconded by Supervisor McGraw, and
carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Supervisor Johnson
IN RE: ADJOURNMENT
z~~
October 25, 1988
c
At 5:00 p.m. Chairman Garrett declared the meeting
adjourned.
Lee Garrett, Chairman
-~
- o~ pOANp, f~
ti ~~
z ~'
J 2
a
~~ 8$
S~SQV~CENTENN~P~
A Beautiful Beginning
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
ELMER C. HODGE
C~A~tnt~ of ~vttnnke
M E M O RAN D U M
T0: Skip Burkart, Commonwealth's Attorney
Sh~eCi~f Michael Kavanaugh
FROM: Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
DATE: May 1, 1989
SUBJECT: Work Session
Anti-cruise ordinance
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
LEE GARRETT. CHAIRMAN
WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
RICHARD W. ROBERS. VICE-CHAIRMAN
CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
BOB L. JOHNSON
HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
STEVEN A. MCGRAW
CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
HARRY C. NICKENS
VIN TON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
At the suggestion of Supervisor Bob Johnson, the County
Attorney's office has drafted an anti-cruise ordinance in an
effort to attempt to alleviate some of the problems that exist
along Williamson Road.
The Board of Supervisors has set a work session on Tuesday, May 9
to discuss this ordinance. I will let you know the specific time
when the agrenda is finalized.
That Board has asked that I invite you to participate in the work
session and to offer your suggestions and comments on the
proposed ordinance. Attached is a copy of the draft ordinance
for your review.
I hope you will be able to attend. If you have questions
concerning the ordinance, please contact the County Attorney's
Office.
mha
P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 2 4018-07 98 (703) 772-2004
DRAFT ORDINANCE
Sec.
When the volume of traffic on any residential street exceeds a
level which will permit continuous movement of traffic and ready
access by any police, fire, rescue, or other public safety vehicles to
all residences abutting such street, any law enforcement officer in
the county is hereby authorized to temporarily close such street to
any private vehicle for such period of time necessary to reduce traf-
fic flow to an acceptable level; provided that any motor vehicle oper-
ated by an individual whose driver's license indicates the driver re-
sides upon such street shall be permitted access during the period
such street is temporarily closed.
Sec. Limitations as to gross weight of vehicles permitted on certain
It shall be unlawful to operate any vehicle upon the following
designated streets in Roanoke County where the gross weight on the
surface of the road through any axle of such vehicle exceeds
thousand pounds: '
LZST
On any street where the weight of vehicles permitted on such
street is limited by ordinance and signs indicating such limitations
are posted, it shall be unlawful `to operate a vehicle in excess of
such weight on such street, except for the purpose of making delivery
or picking up a load, in which case such vehicle may be driven on the
restricted street for not more than the minimum distance necessary for
the purpose.
Sec. Procedures for obtaining restrictions on residential streets
1. Upon the petition•of not less than two-thirds of the home-
owners abutting any residential street in the county, the board of
supervisors, after reviewing the recommendation of the zoning adminis-
trator, may approve any of the following procedures to control or lim-
it nonessential traffic upon a residential street:
-2-
a) establishment of one-way streets to promote the effi-
cient flow of traffic for the residents of such
streets;
b) installation of speed bumps or other physical altera-
tion of the surface of the street in such manner, num-
ber, and location as shall be jointly recommended by
the Department of Engineering and the Department of
Planning and Zoning;
c) physical barriers to control the manner of ingress and
egress to any residential street consistent with the
needs for access for public safety vehicles; and
d) restrictions against turns from a street or highway
across oncoming lanes of traffic into any residential
street.
2. Upon the petition of not less than two-thirds of the home-
owners abutting any residential street in the county, the board of
supervisors, after reviewing the recommendation o'f the zoning admin-
istrator, and after making a positive finding of fact of the existence
of any of the conditions set forth in subparagraph (b), shall estab-
lish one of the following limitations upon the volume of traffic and
hours of usage as follows:
a) between the-hours of 10:00 p.m. and 1:00 a.m. of the
following day, no more than one vehicle per minute
shall be permitted access to any residential street in
any one direction. During such period the speed limit
for such street shall be 15 m.p.h.
b) between the hours of 1:00 a.m. and 6:00 a.m., no more
than one vehicle per five minutes period shall be per-
mu ted access to any residential street in any one
direction. During such period the speed limit for
such street shall be 15 m.p.h.
-3-
One of the following conditions must be met before the
board of supervisors shall approve one or more of the above
restrictions:
a) a family member residing in a dwelling abutting a resi-
dential street shall be afflicted with a diagnosed
physical, emotional, or psychological condition whose
symptoms may be judged with reasonable medical certain-
ty to be aggravated by noise, pollution, or other phys-
ical manifestations of excessive traffic on such
street. The diagnosis and prognosis shall be docu-
mented by the opinion of a licensed practitioner of
one of the healing arts.
b) twenty percent (20~) of the residents of dwellings
abutting a residential street shall be seventy (7U)
years of age or older;
c) one-third (1/3) of the owners of property abutting a
residential street shall have documented evidence of
physical damage to their property 'exceeding
dollars in a one year period directly attributable to
excessive traffic on that street;
d) excessive wear and tear to any residential street as a
result of excessive numbers or weights of vehicles
both on residential streets or as certified by the
county engineer.
Sec. Parking off paved portion of any street; exception
It shall be unlawful for any vehicle to be operated or parked
off of the paved or graded portion of any street or highway in the
county; except where such vehicle shall be parked or operated upon the
property owned by such operator or owner of the vehicle.
Sec. Driving while eating or drinking unlawful
It shall be unlawful for any person to operate any vehicle upon
any street restricted under section while eating any food, drink-
ing any beverage, or transporting any prepared food or opened beverage
in such vehicle.
-4-
Sec. Definitions
1. Gross weight - The total weight of any vehicle or combina-
tion of vehicles and the load or loads as defined by statute or ordin-
ance.
2. Park - To stand (stop) a vehicle whether occupied or not,
for a period of time greater than is reasonably necessary for the
actual loading or unloading.
3. Property line - The line marking the boundary between any
street and the lots or property abutting thereon.
4. Residential street - Any street upon which not less than
three unattached dwellings for occupation by a family of two or more
abutt.
5. Street or highway - The entire width between property
lines or every way or place of whatever nature when any part thereof
is open to the use of the public as a matter of right, for the purpose
of vehicular traffic.
6. Vehicle - Every device in, upon or by which any person or
property is or may be transported or drawn upon ady street or highway
except devices moving by human power or used exclusively upon station-
ary rails or tracks.
Sec. Severability
The sections, paragraphs, sentences,- clauses, and phrases of
this chapter are severable,.and if any phrase, clause, sentence, para-
graph, or section of this chapter shall be declared unconstitutional
or invalid by the valid judgment or decree of a court of competent
jurisdiction, the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs
and sections of this chapter shall remain valid.
G-"'
AT THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, MAY 9, 1989
RESOLUTION 5989-12.a _REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF
HORSEPEN MOUNTAIN DRIVE AND HORSEPEN MOUNTAIN CIRCLE
INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That this matter came this day to be heard upon the
proceedings herein, and upon the application of Horsepen Mountain
Drive from its intersection with Laurel Glen Road (Route 651) to
the terminus at the cul-de-sac for a distance of 0.50 miles, and
Horsepen Mountain Circle from Horsepen Mountain Drive to the
terminus at the cul-de-sac for a distance of 0.05 miles to be
accepted and made a part of the Secondary System of State
Highways under Section 33.1-229 of the Virginia State Code.
2. That it appears to the Board that drainage easements
and a fifty (50) foot right-of-way for said road have heretofore
been dedicated by virtue of a certain map known as Falling Creek
Estates, Section 6, which map was recorded in Plat Book 9, Page
316, of the records of the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of
Roanoke County, Virginia, on March 12, 1985, and that by reason
of the recordation of said map no report from a Board of Viewers,
nor consent or donation of right-of-way from the abutting
property owners is necessary. The Board hereby guarantees said
right-of-way for drainage.
3. That said roads known as Horsepen Mountain Drive and
Horsepen Mountain Circle and which are shown on a certain sketch
accompanying this Resolution, be, and the same are hereby
established as public roads to become a part of the State
Secondary System of Highways in Roanoke County, only from and
after notification of official acceptance of said streets or
highway by the Virginia Department of Transportation.
On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor
Nickens and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Supervisor McGraw
A COPY TESTE:
Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Phillip Henry, Director, Engineering
Arnold Covey, Director, Development & Inspections, and
copy for Virginia Department of Transportation
2
ITEM NUMBER Gam. ~"~
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: May 9, 1989
SUBJECT: Acceptance of Horsepen Mountain Drive and Horsepen
Mountain Circle into the Virginia Department of Transportation
Secondary System.
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
Akfer Development Corporation, the developer of Falling
Creek Estates, Section 6, requests that the Board of Supervisors
approve a resolution to the Virginia Department of Transportation
requesting that they accept 0.50 miles of Horsepen Mountain Drive
and 0.05 miles of Horsepen Mountain Circle.
The staff has inspected these
representatives of the Virginia Department
find the roads are acceptable.
FISCAL IMPACT:
No County funding is required.
RECOMMENDATION:
roads along with
of Transportation and
The staff recommends that the Board approve a resolution to
the VDOT requesting that they accept Horsepen Mountain Drive and
Horsepen Mountain Circle into the Secondary Road System.
SUBMITTED BY:
.~~C~
4 1J
Philli T. Henry
Director of Engineering
APPROVED:
~/~
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
L-..~.
Approved ( )
Denied ( )
Received ( )
Referred
To
ACTION
Motion by:
VOTE
No Yes Abs
Garrett
Johnson
McGraw
Nickens
Robers
--~ ;'- -
I•, noc
i
~ ~~ K~ +}}j{,
1 7
//{{{ ,},,..y~AA~~~
!gAfY1 y~~(jl~
r - -- . _. ..~saz --
•~ ~
/ 9° \ ,
_~. wY.~ FA~LI' CR I \
~ta:a:K ~MOUwr f •
~',
.woo PODIAq CgpM 4`
MANDAF / ~
~ .1396
i
1 `
~~` ~~r~~y~~,,,,,,555
~~ I ~
VICINITY MAP .,z,~
PROPOSED ADDITION SHOWN
IN GRAY
DESCRIPTION:
(1) Horsepen Mountain Drive
from its intersection
with Laurel Glen Road
(Route 651) to cul-de-sac.
(2) Horsepen Mountain Circle
from Horsepen Mountain
Drive to cul-de-sac.
LENGTH: (1) '~`D-50 Miles
RIGHT OF WAY: (1) 50 Feet
ROADWAY WIDTH: (1) 32 Feet
SURFACE WIDTH: (1) 20 Feet
SERVICE: (1) 30 Homes
LENGTH: (2) 0.05 Miles
RIGHT OF WAY: (2) 50 Feet
ROADWAY WIDTH: (2) 32 Feet
SURFACE WIDTH (2) 20 Feet
SERVICE: (2) 4 Homes
IMPROVEMENT NECESSARY:
RESIDENT ENGINEERS eo<
RECOMMENDATION:
.~ - 2
Q
NORTH
~~~
•ir -
~ ~
.~ M ~
} 4
M~
. n
! ~
.:~~ 4 a 33.1
~,
34
Sr 21
~ "` ~~ 20 2.SiAc
1
> ,~
~ ~ zsA<
..,,
/'~ 58 ~~ al9 ~
~
(2) ~M„ ~tl~
u 29
~ .. % ~ 18 a ao~
~' s
3
~
-~
•17
s
N
fi0 ,r ~oN s !a its
sise ~ 16 , : 24 a ~_~
•p~ e ~ ~
•
"' aip j r IS ~
.o~~• '~ a
s/eo .',.°~ 8 26 ,s .' 28
<
~ • o~,
4
8.43 Ac
s 14
cti.,
~ r .
ioaAc ,oss
'
•
+t 13
123' ~O.
,
r ~ M*J
.,•i ~ _ 11 .aae ~ 27 p LOYNI
N
J ~
• a !!~
s
I ' r' b sae!
s+,• ~, ~ + ~ . •
~~ • ~ ~O7 '~ ~~ y21
8~ f ~
J
~ ~ ~~ `~ ~ ~ "91 ~ i
f'. G e
P ! '6.
V/0 ! ... .~ ~ L N ~ S
1~
s_ / ~ ` 1s• J
~O~' ` 0 77 :alt>' l'
( `j~ J 102 AC
/ ~-
R
Acceptance of Horsepen Mountain Drive and Horsepen
COMMUNITY SERVICES Mountain Circle in Virginia Department of
AND DEVELOPMENT Transportation Secondary System
3 J
L -,~.
AT THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HCENTER ONETUESDAYE MAYN9Y 1989NISTRATION
RESOLUTION REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF
HORSEPEN MOUNTAIN DRIVE AND HORSEPEN MOUNTAIN CIRCLE
INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1, That this matter came this day to be heard upon the
proceedings herein, and upon the application of Horsepen Mountain
Drive from its intersection with Laurel Glen Road (Route 651) to
the terminus at the cul-de-sac for a distance of 0.50 miles, and
Horsepen Mountain Circle from Horsepen Mountain Drive to the
terminus at the cul-de-sac for a distance of 0.05 miles to be
accepted and made a part of the Secondary System of State
Highways under Section 33.1-229 of the Virginia State Code.
2. That it appears to the Board that drainage easements
and a fifty (50) foot right-of-way for said road have heretofore
been dedicated by virtue of a certain map known as Falling Creek
Estates, Section 6, which map was recorded in Plat Book 9, Page
316, of the records of the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of
Roanoke County, Virginia, on March 12, 1985, and that by reason
of the recordation of said map no report from a Board of Viewers,
nor consent or donation of right-of-way from the abutting
property owners is necessary. The Board hereby guarantees said
right-of-way for drainage.
4
L-2
3. That said roads known as Horsepen Mountain Drive and
Horsepen Mountain Circle and which a.re shown on a certain sketch
accompanying this Resolution, be, and the same are hereby
established as public roads to become a part of the State
Secondary System of Highways in Roanoke County, only from and
after notification of official acceptance of said streets or
highway by the Virginia Department of Transportation.
5
r' ~.
~'.
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, MAY 9, 1989
RESOLUTION 5989-12b
AUTHORIZING THE CLEAN
VALLEY COUNCIL TO APPLY FOR
AN ANTI-LITTER PROGRAM
GRANT FOR ROANOKE COUNTY
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That the Board hereby expresses its intent to
combine with the City of Roanoke, Town of Vinton, Botetourt
County, and City of Salem in a mutually agreed upon and
cooperative program, contingent on approval of the application by
the Department of Waste Management, Division of Litter Control
and Recycling, and contingent on receipt of such funds for the
fiscal year ending June 30, 1990; and
2. That the Board hereby authorizes Clean Valley
Council, Inc., to plan and budget for a cooperative anti-litter
program for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1990 which shall
represent said program for all localities named in this
resolution; and
3. That the Board further authorizes Clean Valley
Council, Inc., to apply on behalf of Roanoke County for a grant,
and to be responsible for the administration, implementation, and
completion of the program; and
4. That the Board further accepts responsibility
jointly with the Clean Valley Council, Inc., and the City of
Roanoke, Town of Vinton, Botetourt County, and City of Salem for
all phases of the program; and
5. That said funds when received will be transferred
immediately to Clean Valley Council, Inc; all funds will be used
in the cooperative program to which the Board gives its
endorsement and support; and
6. That the financial records of Clean Valley Council,
Inc., shall be subject to inspection and review by the Assistant
County Administrator of Management Services and such data shall
be presented to allow proper reporting on a timely basis by the
County; and
7. That the Board requests the Department of
Waste Management, Division of Litter Control and Waste Recycling
to consider and approve the application and program, said program
being in accord with the regulations governing use and
expenditure of said funds.
On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor
Nickens, and upon the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Supervisor McGraw
A COPY TESTE:
~-
Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
5/10/89
CC: File
Clean Valley Council
Clerk, City of Roanoke
Clerk, City of Salem
Clerk, Town of Vinton
Clerk, County of Botetourt
Diane Hyatt, Director of Finance
ACTION NUMBER
ITEM NUMBER `~~
AT A RE IN A HELDTIAT THE ROANOKER COUNTY ADMINIOTRATO ON ROCENOTER
COUNTY, VIRG
MEETING DATE: May 9, 1989
A('ENDA ITEM: Resolution requesting approval of a grant
application for Clean Valley Council
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
~(.GoQ-vrvv«
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
Each year Roanoke County
Council for adoption of a
Council as the agency
County, as well as the c
Vinton, and Botetourt C
apply for grant funds
participating localities
the grant application to
Control and Recycling.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
receives a request from the Clean Valley
resolution designating the Clean Valley
to handle litter control for Roanoke
ities of Roanoke and Salem, the Town of
aunty. This resolution is necessary to
for operation of the program. All
must pass similar resolutions to allow
be sent, to the State Division of Litter
Staff recommends adoption of the attached resolution authorizing
Clean Valley Council as the designated agenc oval of dthelgrant
control for Roanoke County, and requesting app
application.
SUBMITTED BY:
~~~ fi
Mary H. Allen
Cl k
APPROVED BY:
Elmer C. Hodge
Deputy er County Administrator
---------------------------------
Approved ( )
Denied ( )
Received ( )
Referred
To:
ACTION
Motion by: _
VOTE
Yes No Abs
Garrett
Johnson
McGraw
Nickens
Robers
L-3
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINCENTERLONATUESDAYO ivlpyE9C0II989 p,DMINISTRATION
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE
CLEAN VALLEY COUNCIL TO
APPLY FOR AN ANTI-LITTER
PROGRAM GRANT FOR ROANOKE
COUNTY
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That the Board hereby expresses its intent to
combine with the City of Roanoke, Town of Vinton, Botetourt
County, and City of Salem in a mutually agreed upon and
cooperative program, contingent on approval of the application by
the Department of Waste Management, Division of Litter Control
and Recycling, and contingent on receipt of such funds for the
fiscal year ending June 30, 1990; and
2. That the Board hereby authorizes Clean Valley
Council, Inc., to plan and budget for a cooperative anti-litter
program for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1990 which shall
represent said program for all localities named in this
resolution; and
3. That the Board further authorizes Clean Valley
Council, Inc., to apply on behalf of Roanoke County for a grant,
and to be responsible for the administration, implementation, and
completion of the program; and
4. That the Board further accepts responsibility
jointly with the Clean Valley Council, Inc., and the City of
Roanoke, Town of Vinton, Botetourt County, and City of Salem for
all phases of the program; and
-~
5. That said funds when received will be transferred
immediately to Clean Valley Council, Inc; all funds will be used
in the cooperative program to which the Board gives its
endorsement and support; and
6. That the financial records of Clean Valley Council,
Inc., shall be subject to inspection and review by the Assistant
County Administrator of Management Services and such data shall
be presented to allow proper reporting on a timely basis by the
County; and
7. That the Board requests the Department of
Waste Management, Division of Litter Control and Waste Recycling
to consider and approve the application and program, said program
being in accord with the regulations governing use and
expenditure of said funds.
! ~ k
~,....-
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
IN ROANOKE, VA. ON TUESDAY, MAY 9, 1989
RESOLUTION 5989-12.e SUPPORTING THE REQUEST
OF CRAIG COUNTY TO BECOME A MEMBER OF THE
MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES OF THE ROANOKE VALLEY
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia as follows:
WHEREAS, Chapter 10 of Title 37.1 of the Code of
Virginia (1950), as amended provides for the establishment of a
community services board to deliver mental health, mental
retardation, and substance abuse services; and
WHEREAS, the Cities of Roanoke and Salem and Counties
of Botetourt and Roanoke, with the intent of implementing
provisions of Chapter 10 of Title 37.1 of the Code of Virginia,
have joined together to establish Mental Health Services of the
Roanoke Valley; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Craig County,
Virginia has, at its meeting, passed a resolution requesting
membership in and representation on the Board of Directors of
Mental Health Services of the Roanoke Valley.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of
Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, in conjunction with the
Councils of the Cities of Roanoke and Salem and the Board of
Supervisors of the County of Botetourt, approves the request of
Craig County for membership in Mental Health Services of Roanoke
Valley; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board of Directors of
Mental Health Services of the Roanoke Valley is instructed by the
member jurisdiction to present for their ratification amended
By-laws, increasing the membership of the Board from fifteen to
sixteen with the additional member to be appointed by the Board
of Supervisors of Craig County.
On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor
Nickens, and upon the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Supervisor McGraw
A COPY TESTE:
~ ~_
Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
5/10/89
CC: File
Mental Health Services of the Roanoke Valley
Craig County Board of Supervisors
ACTION N0.
ITEM NUMBER L.- -
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: May 9, 1989
SUBJECT: Approval of Resolution supporting the membership of
Craig County to the Mental Health Services of the
Roanoke Valley
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
Craig County has requested membership in the Mental Health
Services of the Roanoke Valley. The Board of Directors of that
organization has begun the process of adding Craig County as a
member jurisdiction.
In order to become a member, it is necessary that all
participating jurisidictions support their membership
by resolution. Attached is a resolution supporting their request
for membership.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors adopt the attached
resolution supporting Craig County's request for membership to
the Mental Health Services of the Roanoke Valley.
SUBMITTED BY:
Y~ ~-~ o~
Mary H. Allen
Deputy Clerk
Approved ( )
Denied ( )
Received ( )
Referred
To
Motion by:
ACTION
APPROVED:
~~~
Elmer C. Hodg
County Administrator
VOTE
No Yes Abs
Garrett
Johnson
McGraw
Nickens
Robers
~- - y
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
IN ROANOKE, VA. ON TUESDAY, MAY 9, 1989
RESOLUTION SUPPORTING THE REQUEST OF
CRAIG COUNTY TO BECOME A MEMBER OF THE MENTAL
HEALTH SERVICES OF THE ROANOKE VALLEY
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia as follows:
WHEREAS, Chapter 10 of Title 37.1 of the Code of
Virginia (1950), as amended provides for the establishment of a
community services board to deliver mental health, mental
retardation, and substance abuse services; and
WHEREAS, the Cities of Roanoke and Salem and Counties
of Botetourt and Roanoke, with the intent of implementing
provisions of Chapter 10 of Title 37.1 of the Code of Virginia,
have joined together to establish Mental Health Services of the
Roanoke Valley; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Craig County,
Virginia has, at its meeting, passed a resolution requesting
membership in and representation on the Board of Directors of
Mental Health Services of the Roanoke Valley.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of
Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, in conjunction with the
Councils of the Cities of Roanoke and Salem and the Board of
Supervisors of the County of Botetourt, approves the request of
Craig County for membership in Mental Health Services of Roanoke
Valley; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board of Directors of
Mental Health Services of the Roanoke Valley is instructed by the
L-
member jurisdiction to present for their ratification amended
By-laws, increasing the membership of the Board from fifteen to
sixteen with the additional member to be appointed by the Board
of Supervisors of Craig County.
ACTION N0.
ITEM NUMBER
A-5989-12.d
L -5
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
~ COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
IN ROANOKE, VA., ON TUESDAY,
MEETING DATE: May 9,1989
SUBJECT: Acceptance of Roads into the Va. Department of
Transportation Secondary System
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The following additions to the Secondary System have been
accepted by the Virginia Department of Transportation effective
April 20, 1989:
a. 0.24 miles of Quail Place
b. 0.12 miles of Meadewood Drive
c. 0.16 miles of Byers Road
d. 0.69 miles of Lakemont Drive
SUBMITTED BY:
,~r~~.-t~., ,~
Mary H. Allen
Deputy Clerk
APPROVED:
~G~
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
ACTION VOTE
Approved (x) Motion by. Bob L Johnson/Harry No Yes Abs
Denied ( ) C. Nickens Garrett x
Received ( ) Johnson x
Referred McGraw Absent
To Nickens x
Robers x
cc: File
Phillip Henry, Director, Engineering
~ ^. ., ~ ! I`j~~"^~ ,+~ it i1~~~ `~~; ~- v
e ,~~~ ~ .
~~
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
1401 EAST BROAD STREET
RAY D. PETHTEL RICHMOND, 23219
COMMISSIONER A ril 20, 1989 OSCAR K. MABRY
P DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
Secondary System
Additions
Roanoke County
Revenue Sharing
Project: 1888-080-266, N501
Project: 1900-080-267, N501
Project: 1800-080-268, N501
Project: 1446-080-269, N501
Board of Supervisors
County of Roanoke
P. 0. Box 29800
Roanoke, VA 24018
MEMBERS OF THE BOARD:
As requested in your resolutans dated July 12, 1988, September 27,
1988, and January 10, 1989, the following additions to the Secondary
System of Roanoke County are hereby approved, effective April 20, 1989.
ADDITIONS LENGTH
Route 1888 (Quail Place) - From 0.14 mile North Route 1913
to Route 1900. 0.24 Mi.
Route 1900 (Meadewood Drive) - From 0.05 mile Northeast
Route 1888 to 0.07 mile East Route 1888. 0.12 Mi.
Route 1800 (Byers Road) - From Route 1888 to 0.16 mile
Northwest Route 1888. 0.16 Mi.
Route 1446 (Lakemont Drive) - From Route 1443 to South
cul-de-sac. 0.69 Mi.
Sincerely,
C~z-~' ~
Oscar K. Mabry
Deputy Commissioner
TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21ST CENTURY
~~
AT THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, MAY 9, 1989
RESOLUTION 5989-12.c REQUESTING SPECIAL ALLOCATION
FROM VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TO IMPROVE
ROADS IN HUNTING HILLS SUBDIVISION, CHAUCER'S COURT
(ROUTE 1794), AND GIVENS AVENUE (ROUTE 1109)
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That this matter came this day to be heard upon the
application of the developers of Huntings Hills Subdivision,
property owner along Chaucer's Court (Route 1794), and Roanoke
County for Givens Avenue (Route 1109) for road and drainage
improvements.
2. That in accordance with Section 33.1-75.1 of the Code
of Virginia, 1950, as amended, State matching allocation is
available to improve, maintain, construct, or reconstruct State
Highways within the County.
3. As an inducement to adopt this resolution, Old Heritage
Corporation (Developer of Hunting Hills Subdivision) and the
property owners of Chaucer's Court have agreed to pay to the
County's General Fund the equivalent amount of the local share
needed for the State's matching allocation and will deposit these
funds with the Roanoke County Treasurer's Office within 30 days
upon receiving notification that the Commonwealth Transportation
Commission has approved State matching allocation for these two
projects.
4. That, Roanoke County has presently or will make
available from County General Funds the local share of the
drainage improvements on Givens Avenue upon receiving
notification by the Commonwealth Transportation Commission of the
approval of the State's matching allocation.
5. That, Roanoke County and the Virginia Department of
Transportation improve roads in Huntings Hills Subdivision, and
Chaucer's Court, and construct drainage improvements on and
adjacent to Givens Avenue, and that funds be allocated for the
local share of these projects and be available to the Virginia
Department of Transportation at the appropriate time.
6. That, the Virginia Department of Transportation and the
Commonwealth Transportation Commission is hereby requested
pursuant to Section 33.1-75.1 of the State Code, to make
available an equivalent matching fund allocation for the
improvements of roads in Hunting Hills Subdivision, Chaucer's
Court and Givens Avenue in the total amount of $142,500.
7. That the County Administrator of Roanoke County or his
designee be authorized to take such action and execute such
documents as may be necessary to accomplish these projects, upon
form as approved by the County Attorney.
On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor
Nickens and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Supervisor McGraw
2
A COPY TESTE:
Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Phillip Henry, Director, Engineering
Arnold Covey, Director, Development & Inspections, and
copy for Virginia Department of Transporation
Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance
Reta Busher, Director, Management & Budget
ITEM NUMBER L'--
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: May 9, 1989
SUBJECT: Authorization to request Virginia Department of
Transportation Revenue Sharing Funds to construct road and
drainage improvements.
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
BACKGROUND:
In accordance to Section 33.1-75.1 of the Code of Virginia,
1950, as amended, special funds (revenue sharing) are available
to Roanoke County up to $500,000 in matching funds.
The Board of Supervisors on April 11, 1989, authorized the
Chairman to forward a letter to the Virginia Department of
Transportation requesting revenue sharing funds for the following
three projects:
a. Roadways in Hunting Hills
b. Improvements to Chaucer's Court (Route 1794) located
in Canterbury Park
c. Drainage Improvements on Givens Avenue (Route 1109)
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The Virginia Department of Transportation requires the Board
of Supervisors to officially request revenue sharing funds, and
provide the list of projects to VDOT by May 15, 1989. Staff has
continued to review these three projects to determine the
availability of local funding. The developer of Hunting Hills
has written to Roanoke County indicating a willingness to
contribute up to $90,000 toward upgrade of additional private
roads in this subdivision. Roanoke County has received 9
petitions from property owners on Chaucer's Court indicating a
willingness to pay the 50~ local share for these street
improvements. The drainage improvements on Givens Road will be
funded locally through the Drainage Budget for FY 88-89 and FY
89-90.
L-CO
The revenue sharing request for these drainage projects is
as follows:
a. Roads in Hunting Hills Subdivision $ 87,500
b. Improvements to Chaucer's Court $ 22,500
c. Drainage Improvements on Givens Ave. $ 32,500
Total $142,500
FISCAL IMPACT:
With the exception of approved funding for the drainage
project, no County funding would be required for the
reconstruction of the roadways. Funding from the yearly roadway
budget will be utilized for engineering and survey work and
preparation of the road package for submittal to VDOT.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors approve the
attached resolution requesting the Virginia Department of
Transportation matching funds (revenue sharing) allocation for
road improvements in the Hunting Hills Subdivision, and on
Chaucer's Court and drainage improvements on Givens Avenue in
accordance to Section 33.1-75.1 of the Code of Virginia.
SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED:
~"
Phillip T. enry, P.E Elmer C. Hodge
Director of Engineering County Administrator
Approved ( )
Denied ( )
Received ( )
Referred
To
ACTION
Motion by:
VOTE
No Yes Abs
Garrett
Johnson
McGraw
Nickens
Robers
L-
NORTH
- T
~4 ~ ~ •
~ A ~
~ ,
T ~ ~ S i
a
N e ~
r
f ~ ~
a ~
~ ~ ` '~
~
O
4
• .
M 4 ~
~ O
• ~
~
w 3 • j.
~ q ~
!t
N ~
•
o. ~
_.
~
~ w
r
~ ..
~
r
I M a
~
~
I/ ~
~ !4 , ~
~ ~ a • 01 ,
~ r ti
~ ~
~ y
~ ~ I
=S I
N ~ ~ ~ ` ~ I
M
1
, 3
O
a ~
~ ~ ~a
'
..
n !
COIyMUNITY SBRVICBS
AND DBVBLOPMBNT
CBAOCBB' S COMB? ROAD AMID DBAIliAGE
3
r
L - (p
Q
NORTA
---- --
__ ..__--- _:I
~~~~~~~ ~
~ ~~ --
PROPOSED 24" - -!
STORl~i SEHBg: / _.
' ~ -
• I,~--~-- PRUPOS® 2D ~ •
t
/ / DBAIPAGB ssT~.'r
• ~ ~ ~
~y
1 __
:i,
i ~DSCO sBCUeIrY
tocrs
~~
~~
~~i
- ' ' ~•. I
• , I~
` EZIST. 30° STOBti SEWBY I .
4.'~ ~~~
W. MAUI S?. S?. 460
GIVENS AVENUE DRAINAGB IMPROVEMENTS
COMMUNITY SBRVICBS 4
AND DgVBLOPMSNT
L- l~
AT THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, MAY 9, 1989
RESOLUTION REQUESTING SPECIAL ALLOCATION
FROM VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TO IMPROVE
ROADS IN HUNTING HILLS SUBDIVISION, CHAUCER'S COURT
(ROUTE 1794), AND GIVENS AVENUE (ROUTE 1109)
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That this matter came this day to be heard upon the
application of the developers of Huntings Hills Subdivision,
property owner along Chaucer's Court (Route 1794), and Roanoke
County for Givens Avenue (Route 1109) for road and drainage
improvements.
2. That in accordance with Section 33.1-75.1 of the Code
of Virginia, 1950, as amended, State matching allocation is
available to improve, maintain, construct, or reconstruct State
Highways within the County.
3. As an inducement to adopt this resolution, Old Heritage
Corporation (Developer of Hunting Hills Subdivision) and the
property owners of Chaucer's Court have agreed to pay to the
County's General Fund the equivalent amount of the local share
needed for the State's matching allocation and will deposit these
funds with the Roanoke County Treasurer's Office within 30 days
upon receiving notification that the Commonwealth Transportation
Commission has approved State matching allocation for these two
projects.
5
~'~
` 4. That, Roanoke County has presently or will make
available from County General Funds the local share of the
drainage improvements on Givens Avenue upon receiving
notification by the Commonwealth Transportation Commission of the
approval of the State's matching allocation.
5. That, Roanoke County and the Virginia Department of
Transportation improve roads in Huntings Hills Subdivision, and
Chaucer's Court, and construct drainage improvements on and
adjacent to Givens Avenue, and that funds be allocated for the
local share of these projects and be available to the Virginia
Department of Transportation at the appropriate time.
6. That, the Virginia Department of Transportation and the
Commonwealth Transportation Commission is hereby requested
pursuant to Section 33.1-75.1 of the State Code, to make
available an equivalent matching fund allocation for the
improvements of roads in Hunting Hills Subdivision, Chaucer's
Court and Givens Avenue in the total amount of $142,500.
7. That the County Administrator of Roanoke County or his
designee be authorized to take such action and execute such
documents as may be necessary to accomplish these projects, upon
form as approved by the County Attorney.
6
ACTION N0. A-5989-13
ITEM NUMBER L- -
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: May 9, 1989
AGENDA ITEM: Resolution certifying approval of the proposed
multi-family developments known as Grouse Pointe
Apartments and Highgate Apartments
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
p~/ / ~~
G
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The Virginia Housing Development Authority is considering the
financing of two multi-family residential housing developments
located in Roanoke County. These projects are known as the
Grouse Pointe Apartments and Highgate Apartments. The State Code
requires that the local governing body acknowledge its approval
or disapproval by certification and resolution.
Director of Planning Terry Harrington has reviewed these proposed
developments and determined that they conform to the County's
zoning and subdivision regulations and comprehensive plan
policies.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the attached resolution of approval be
adopted and a certified copy be sent to the Virginia Housing
Development Authority.
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
ACTION VOTE
Approved ( ) Motion by: Richard W. Robers/ Yes No Abs
Denied (x) Harry C. Nickens to denv Garrett x
Received ( ) approval Johnson Abstain
Referred McGraw Aunt
To:
Nickens x
Robers x
cc: File
Terry Harrington, Director, Planning
Paul Mahoney, County Attorney
L-~
L- 7
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY , VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, MAY 9, 1989
RESOLUTION CERTIFYING APPROVAL TO THE VIRGINIA
HOUSING DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE PROPOSED
MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL HOUSING DEVELOPMENTS
KNOWN AS THE GROUSE POINTE APARTMENTS AND
HIGHGATE APARTMENTS
BE IT RESOLVED by Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia as follows:
WHEREAS, the Virginia Housing Development Authority is
considering the financing of two multi-family residential housing
developments to be situated in Roanoke County; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 36-55.39 (B) of the Code of
Virginia, the Virginia Housing Development Authority is required
to request from the governing body of the locality a Certificate
of Approval or Disapproval and certified resolution expressing
its approval or disapproval; and
WHEREAS, The Planning Director for Roanoke County reviewed
the development proposals for Grouse Pointe Apartments and
Highgate Apartments and determined that both projects conform to
the County's zoning and subdivision regulations and comprehensive
plan policies.
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of
Roanoke County, Virginia does hereby grant its approval to the
proposed multi-family residential housing developments known as
the Grouse Pointe Apartments and Highgate Apartments; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a certified copy of this
L- ~
resolution be sent to the Virginia Housing Development Authority
informing them of the Board of Supervisors approval of the
proposed development projects.
~~
ATTACHMENT 'A'
The proposed development will consist of approximately 120 units
of non-subsidized housing to be financed under Virginia Housing
Development Authority's Conventional Multi-Family Loan Program
and situated on approximately 5.8 acres at 7656 Marson Road,
Roanoke County.
~~
ATTACHMENT ~A'
The proposed development will consist of approximately 72 units
of non-subsidized housing to be financed under Virginia Housing
Development Authority's Conventional Multi-Family Loan Program
and situated on approximately 3.6 acres one mile from Electric
Road and 1/4 mile from Buck Mountain Road on Starkey Road,
Roanoke County.
~_
TO: Elmer Hodge
FROM: Terry Harrington ~~~~
DATE: April 27, 1989
SUBJECT: Review of Grouse Pointe Apartments for Conformance with
Local Zoning and Subdivision Regulations and
Comprehensive Plan Policies
I have completed my evaluation of the Grouse Pointe Apartment
Project. Of the 23 criteria contained in the VHDA checklist that
was developed last month, the project does not conform to two of
these 23 criteria. These two criteria are discussed below:
1. Criterion II.A: Comprehensive Plan Desirable Land Use Type
The project is located in an area designated Development
in the 1985 Comprehensive Plan. Although multifamily
units are a desirable land use type in this category, the
plan recommends a maximum density of 12 dwelling units per
acre. The Grouse Pointe project will have 72 units on 3.6
acres for a gross density of 20 units per acre. Fifty-
four of the units will have one bedroom; 18 will be two-
bedroom units.
Although this density exceeds the plan recommendations,
the 72 proposed units represent only 52$ of what R-3
zoning allows on a 3.6 acre lot.
By right, Mr. Jamison can construct 137 one-bedroom units
on this site provided that all other zoning requirements
can be made such as setback, open space, parking, etc.
2. Policy D-2: Encourage Innovation in Design
Development Policy D-2 found on page 41 of the
Comprehensive Plan encourages innovations in land
development and building designs. Specifically, the plan
recommends the use of cluster housing and zero lot line
developments.
Based upon my evaluation of this project, I believe that
it substantially conforms to the criteria we have enclosed
in the checklist. Each of these criterion is found as
part of a previously adopted land use code or policy guide.
Although the project's density exceeds comprehensive plan
recommendations, the project's impact on community
services and facilities should be minimal. Street access
is good for the project and adequate water and sewer
capacity exists. Statistically, these 72 units should
only generate three children for the school system. If
this property were developed as single family, six new
children could be expected.
ajb
~~
EVAI~ITION CEIDC.EU,IST
VADA Conventional Multi-Family Loan Program
The purpose of this checklist is to evaluate projects that have applied for financing
under VfiL1A's Multi-Family Loan Program for conformance with locally adopted zoning and
subdivision standards, and with 1985 Comprehensive Plan designations, guidelines and
policies.
The Zoning Administrator of Roanoke County (Administrator) shall have the
responsibility for evaluating a project and making a recannendation to the Chairman of
the Board of Supervisors (Chairman), on whether or not a project substantially conforms
to the criteria. The Administrator shall provide a narrative statement that explains
any determination that a project does not conform to any or all of the criteria.
The Chairman shall consider the recommendation of the Aclninistrator prior to filing
with VFIDA a certification of approval or disapproval for any project. Upon receipt of
the Administrator's reoannendation, the Chairn~an may refer any project to the Board for
action prior to such time that a certification is filed with VEIDA.
PROJECT NAME : G RO US t PO /nrrE /'7 P,QRTM~I7 TS
LOCATION: A/. E. CoRN~Q o~ S7'.oitKE Y ,Qa. ~No S. /y1 ou~T~:"' Ro .
PR47DGT PRQ7DCP
~iORMS DOES NOT FORM
Z. Zoning and Subdivision Regulations.
A. Site is on a legal lot of record, and
conforms to all applicable Roanoke County
subdivision standards. ~C
B. Site is properly zoned for the proposed
use, and conforms to all applicable
zoning regulations. X
II. 1985 Ca~rehensive Plan Designation:
E !/~ L.aP/-7~I7T
L - ~'
Px~ncr Pxalecr
~ DOFS ITT C0
A. Conformance with Comprehensive Plan
Desirable Land Use Z~pe.
B. Conformance with Comprehensive Plan Land
Use Policies as listed below:
p - ,' Policy 1 M,on,a~' RArF" 6~ G~ou~rll..... ~_
~..2 Policy 2 .LfNGOtJRAGE ..~NNO~/.OT,on. /n D,F;f/6N... ,
p _ 3 Policy 3 ~/lGa,~2c ~~ ~i~JG.lE ~io/~•/y ... .
~_ y Policy 4 ~t2ov~os .DEiyr,T /3oNuret .
p_ 5 Policy 5 Cl7cau~eec~' ~IYE11tF /Vddlin6 ?yP~,i..
D, ~ Policy 6 ~nco~2,o~~ /1'Iix ~/loa/o UJ~..(-
p_7 Policy 7 ~Ror~pE R ~'~itE,o,-,u~ ~oc,l,?~.r ....
p_g Policy 8 PE'/li„~7' /7y/Ti-FpM,~ ~e%. _~
~ _ cj Policy 9 ~tcr~t ~ fY/~dTo2 .t'TiPE'~7;.(....
Policy 10 --
N/A
,~
~-- ~
QONI~~OEiM.S DOES NOT OONr~ORNI N/A
C. Conformance to Resource Protection
Guidelines and Policies:
1. Open Space
2. Watershed
3. Groundwater Recharge
4. Critical Slope
5. Floodplain and Drainage
6. River/Stream and Fake
7. Woodlands
8. Prime Agricultural Lands
9. Historical and Archaeological
10. Unique Areas
11. Air Quality
x
.~_
.~L~
~~
-~-
Certification:
I. ~RRAnct ~- ~A~P4~n6ToN certify that this project DOES /(DOES NOT)
substantially conform to these evaluation criteria and recatmend that t e Chairman of
the Board of Supervisors file a certification of (APPROVAL) (DISAPPROVAL) with VHIaA.
~ ~. ~
Zoning Ar.~ninistrator
~-- ~
TO: Elmer Hodge
FROM: Terry Harrington ~'~.
DATE: April 27, 1989
SUBJECT: :Review of Highgate Apartment Project
I have completed my review of the Highgate Apartment Project.
The project conforms to all of the 21 criteria contained in the
VHDA checklist that was developed last month.
ajb
EVALUATION c~a~IST ~-
VHQA Conventional Multi-Family Loan Program
The purpose of this checklist is to evaluate projects that have applied for financing
under VHDP,'s Multi-Family Loan Program for conformance with locally adopted zoning and
subdivision standards, and with 1985 Comprehensive Plan designations, guidelines and
policies.
The Zoning Administrator of Roanoke County (Administrator) shall have the
responsibility for evaluating a project and making a recommendation to the Chairman of
the Board of Supervisors (Chairman), on whether or not a project substantially conforms
to the criteria. The Administrator shall provide a narrative statement that explains
any determination that a project does not conform to any or all of the criteria.
The Chairman shall consider the recommendation of the Administrator prior to filing
with VfR~ a certification of approval or disapproval for any project. Upon receipt of
the Administrator's recommendation, the Chairman may refer any project to the Board for
action prior to such time that a certification is filed with VHL1A.
PROJECT NAME: /~i~/6NGi4TE QPARTi-9E+~T,.f'
LOCATION: ~6s6 MQRSo~v /QO -
PRQ7DLT PRLI7DCT
CONFORMS DOES BUT OONFORNI
I. Zoning and Subdivision Regulations.
A. Site is on a legal lot of record, and
conforms to all applicable Roanoke County X
subdivision standards.
B. Site is properly zoned for the proposed
use, and conforms to all applicable
zoning regulations. _~
II. 1985 Comprehensive Plan Designation:
CORE
A. Conforniance with Comprehensive Plan
Desirable Land Use Type.
B. Conformance with Comprehensive Plan Land
as listed below:
Use Policies
C- / PO11Cy rr
1 GNGoura~~ ..Lh~Ent~/t ~EV...
G .Z Policy 2 PRow~OE ~4Et ~,aTs ~«~ ... .
G- 3 Policy 3 ~~a K CdaE 6u•r~c~ TiP.Onry' .. .
C- 5/ Policy 4 ~'por. Comm,vi.c-~ (~~.r~c.~ ... .
G-S POllcy 5 SGI?EEA~ ~OWE/2 +~ENl~~
G- 6 Policy 6 ~rc+w••o~ I~/•s,v DFNt,T~
C, - ''~ Policy 7 ~REr~NTE,J .~DE-,T J ~Co~G.. .
Policy 8 '"
Policy 9 '!
Policy 10 °
~-
P~QTHLT P~Oi7F7CT
COIF DOES NOT OONE~ORM N/A
X
~_
X
~~
_~
~-
L- 7
Px~~cr PRa~ncT
~ DOES NOT OONF~ORM N/A
C. Conformance to Resource Protection
Guidelines and Policies:
1. Open Space
2. Watershed
3. Groundwater Recharge
4. Critical Slope
5. Floodplain and Drainage
6. River/Stream and Lake
7. Woodlands
8. Prime Agricultural Lands
9. Historical and Archaeological
10. Unique Areas
11. Air Quality
___!_~__
~_
-~-
~_
-X-
~_
~_
Certification:
I, ~~RRanc_F L~ ~UARR~nGTD~ certify that this project (DOES)/(DOES NOT)
substantially conform to these evaluation criteria, and reccnmend that the Chairman of
the Board of Supervisors file a certification of (APPROVAL)/(DISAPPROVAL) with VHDA.
Zoning Ar~ministrator
+ ~ r /
F~ ANA,
F
a
~ p
z ~,
a
u~~~ ~r~ ~~~~~~
~ ~
18 88
s~$QUICENTENNIP~
A Btauti~itlBtginning May 1 ~, 19 8 9
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
LEE GARRETT, CHAIRMAN
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
ELMER C. HODGE RICHARD W. ROBERS, VICE-CHAIRMAN
CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
Mr. John F. Hastings BOB L. JOHNSON
Senior Development Officer HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRIC7
STEVEN A. MCGRAW
Virginia Housing Development Authority CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
13 South 13th Street HARRY C. NICKENS
VIN TON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
Richmond, Va. 23219
RE: Highgate Apar~ments
Grouse Pointe Apartments
Dear Mr. Hastings:
On May 2, 1989, you were mailed a Certificate of Approval from
Roanoke County concerning the Highgate Apartments and Grouse
Pointe Apartments. The approval was based on a review of the
proposed projects by the County staff.
This was Roanoke County's first request for approval of a VHDA
financed development in several years. I asked the planning
staff to develop a process to review this type of development and
that they review the proposed Highgate and Grouse Pointe
Apartments for compliance with Roanoke County guidelines. Staff
recommended aproval based on conformance to most of the standards
established in the review process. We forwarded the Certificate
of Approval in an effort to meet your 60 day response deadline.
On May 9, 1989, the issue was brought before the Board of
Supervisors for adoption of a resolution requesting support for
these two projects. The Board of Supervisors voted to deny
approval of the proposals. They expressed concern at the density
which is not in conformance with our Comprehensive Plan and land
use guidelines.
I want to assure you that Roanoke County welcomes developments
financed through VHDA. Our only concern was the density of the
two that were proposed. Perhaps in the future, the developers
may want to review their projects with our planning staff for
conformance with our Comprehensive Plan and Future Land Use Map
and resubmit an application for VHDA financing.
Sinc ely, ~ J
cJ
Elmer C. od~
County Administrator
P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 2 4018-07 9 8 (703) 772-2004
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, MAY 9, 1989
IN RE: ACTION 5989-13 CERTIFYING DISAPPROVAL TO
THE VIRGINIA HOUSING DEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY OF THE PROPOSED MULTI-FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL HOUSING DEVELOPMENTS KNOWN AS
THE GROUSE POINTE APARTMENTS AND HIGHGATE
APARTMENTS
Supervisor Robers moved to deny approval of the
proposed multi-family residential housing developments known as
the the.. Grouse Point Apartments and Highgate apartments. The
motion was seconded by Supervisor Nickens and carried by the
following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisor Garrett
NAYS: Supervisors Robers, Nickens
ABSTAIN: Supervisor Johnson
ABSENT: Supervisor McGraw
A COPY TESTE:
~~z~~ .~ Q~.~~
Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
This is to certify that this is a true and correct copy of the .
action that took place at the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
meetin~r.on May 9, 1989
~)~z~-,
Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk
CERTIFICATION OF DISAPPROVAL
In accordance with Virginia Code Section
36-55.39(B), the Board of Supervisors of the County of
Roanoke Virginia, hereby certifies to
the Virginia Housing Development Authority its disapproval
of the proposed multi-family residential housing development
called Grouse Pointe Apartments as expressed
in its resolution duly adopted on
May 9, 1989 19 89,
a certified copy of which is attached hereto.
Optional: Such development is disapproved for the following
reasons: Proposed development does not comply with the
Roanoke County Comprehensive Pland and land use guidelineG
concerning density
Board of Supervisors of
Roanoke Virginia
By
airman
CERTIFICATION OF DISAPPROVAL
Roanoke
In accordance with Virginia Code Section
the Board of Supervisors of the County of
Virginia, hereby certifies to
the Virginia Housing Development Authority its disapproval
of the proposed multi-family residential housing development
called Highgate Apartments as expressed
in its resolution duly adopted on
May 9, 1989 19 89 ,
a certified copy of which is attached hereto.
Optional: Such development is disapproved for the following
reasons: Proposed development does not comply with the
Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan and land use guidelines
for density.
Board of Supervisors of
Roanoke Virginia
By
irman
Per conversation with John Hastings 5/10/89:
If we send in the Certified Resolution and Certificate of
Disapproval•
- The project is dead insofar as VHDA financing is concerned.
They will not proceed to consider approval of these projects.
- The projects can still be built but not with VHDA financing.
- The property may be sold again and another developer may
request VDHA financing of the project.
If we do nothing:
- The projects remain in the pot for potential VHDA financing.
- It will be at least a month or more before they begin the
process.
- The Certificates of Approval that were already sent will remain
active.
If we reconsider at the next meeting•
- It will actually be too late, but we may want to go ahead
because future projects will stand a better chance of going
through.
- They will inform any new projects in Roanoke County that we
disapproved the last projects.
~~ ...
.~ ~;..-
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, MAY 9, 1989
IN RE: ACTION 5989-13 CERTIFYING DISAPPROVAL TO
THE VIRGINIA HOUSING DEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY OF THE PROPOSED MULTI-FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL HOUSING DEVELOPMENTS KNOWN AS
THE GROUSE POINTE APARTMENTS AND HIGHGATE
APARTMENTS
Supervisor Robers moved to deny approval of the
proposed multi-family residential housing developments known as
the the Grouse Point Apartments and Highgate apartments. The
motion was seconded by Supervisor Nickens and carried by the
following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Robers, Nickens
NAYS: Supervisor Garrett
ABSTAIN: Supervisor Johnson
ABSENT: Supervisor McGraw
A COPY TESTE:
~-~r~ ~
Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
This is to certify that this is a true and correct copy of the
action that took place at the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
meeting on May 9, 1989.
Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk
Per conversation with John Hastings 5/10/89:
If we send in the Certified Resolution and Certificate of
Disapproval•
- The project is dead insofar as VHDA financing is concerned.
They will not proceed to consider approval of these projects.
- The projects can still be built but not with VHDA financing.
- The property may be sold again and another developer may
request VDHA financing of the project.
If we do nothing:
- The projects remain in the pot for potential VHDA financing.
- It will be at least a month or more before they begin the
process.
- The Certificates of Approval that were already sent will remain
active.
If we reconsider at the next meeting:
- It will actually be too late, but we may want to go ahead
because future projects will stand a better chance of going
through.
- They will inform any new projects in Roanoke County that we
disapproved the last projects.
of aoaHO~~
~"
z ~'
°v :* a2
18 ~~ 88
~~SQUICENTENN~P~
A Beauti~u/Beginning
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
ELMER C. HODGE
May 2, 1989
Mr. John F. Hastings
Senior Development Officers
Virginia Housing Development Authority
13 South 13th Street
Richmond, Virginia 23219
Dear Mr. Hastings:
RE: Highgate Apartments
Grouse Pointe Apartments
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
LEE GARRETT. CHAIRMAN
WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
RICHARD W. ROBERS. VICE-CHAIRMAN
CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
B08 L. JOHNSON
HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
STEVEN A. MCGRAW
CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
HARRY C. NICKENS
VIN TON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
Our Planning Director has reviewed the development proposals
referenced above for conformance with Roanoke County's zoning and
subdivision regulations and comprehensive
determined that both projects meet the established cripteriales, and
Attached are signed copies of Roanoke County's Certification of
Approval regarding the proposed development of Highgate
Apartments and Grouse Pointe Apartments.
If I can assist your further, please contact me.
LG/mha
C~uunt~ of ~uttnukr
Sincerely,
~~~ ~
~dZ~c1~~
Lee Garrett, Chairman
Roanoke County Board
CC: Ronald E. Sweeney, Senior Vice President
Sovran Mortgage Corporation
P• 0. Box 466
Richmond, Virginia 23203
of Supervisors
P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24018-0798 (703) 772-2004
CERTIFICATION OF APPROVAL
In accordance with Virginia Code Section 36-55.39(B),
the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke
Virginia, hereb ~ '
y certifies to the Virginia Housing Development
Authority its approval of the
proposed multi-famil
housing development called Grouse Pointe Apartments esidential
as expressed in '
its resolution duly adopted on MaY 9, 1989
19 a certified co v
P_ of which igx~{~~~~x~~~;~X
will be forthcoming.
Board of Supervisors of
Roanoke County
Virginia
By . ~ ~-~-
Its Chairman
CERTIFICATION OF APPROVAL
In accordance with Virginia Code Section 36-55.39(B),
the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke
Virginia, hereby certifies to the Virginia Housing Development
Authority its approval of the proposed multi-family residential
housing development called Highgate Apartments
as expressed in its resolution duly adopted on May 9, 1989
19 a certified copy of which i~~~}f~~~~~~.
will be forthcoming.
Board of Supervisors of
Roanoke unt Virginia
By . .` -_
It Chairman
~.-
VIRGINIA
HOUSING
DEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY
13 SOUTH 13TH STREET RICHMOND VIRGINIA 23219-4188
CERTIFIED MAIL
March 13, 1989
The Honorable Lee Garrett
Chairman
Roanoke County
PO Box 29800
Roanoke, VA 24018-0798
RE: Highgate Apartments
Roanoke County
Dear Chairman Garrett:
JOHN RITCHIE, JR.
Executive Director
TELEPHONE 804/782-1986
On March 9, 1989 we sent you notification under Section 36-
55.39(B) of the Code of Virginia which contained an Attachment
"A" which was in error.
Enclosed is an amended Attachment "A". The sixty day notifica-
tion period is hereby amended to the date of this letter.
Very truly yours,
i
ohn ast ngs
Senior Developmen Officer
cc: Ronald E. Sweeney
Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator
ATTACHMENT ~A'
The proposed development will consist of approximately 96 units
of non-subsidized housing to be financed under Virginia Housing
Development Authority's Conventional Multi-Family Loan Program
and situated on approximately 5.08 acres at 7655 Marson Road,
Roanoke County.
~1 S ~ ' t'~ ~f1 ~~~
VIRGINIk
HOUSING
DEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY
13 SOUTH 13TH STREET
March 9, 1989
The Honorable Lee Garrett
Chairman
Roanoke County
PO BOX 29800
Roanoke, VA 24018-0798
RE: Highgate Apartments
Roanoke County
Dear Chairman Garrett:
JOHN RITCHIE, JR.
Executive Director
RICHMOND VIRGINIA 23219-4188 TELEPHONE 804/782-1986
Pursuant to Section 36-55.39(B) of the Code of Virginia, a copy
of which is enclosed, you are hereby notified that the Virginia
Housing Development Authority is considering the financing of
the multi-family residential housing development described in
the enclosed Attachment "A", which is to be situated in your
locality. Should you desire additional information regarding
the development proposal, please contact Mr. Ronald E. Sweeney,-
Senior Vice President, Sovran Mortgage Corporation, PO Box 466,
Richmond, VA 23203-0466.
If you desire to disapprove the development proposal, you may do
so by certifying to the Authority in writing within sixty days of
the date hereof. A certified copy of any resolution disapproving
the development proposal should accompany the above certifi-
cation. We would ask that any such certification be in the form
attached hereto though the statement of any reasons for your
action is optional.
You will note that Section 36-55.39(B)
governing body of a locality may, by
proposed housing development. If you
development, we would ask that such
attached hereto. A certified copy of t
the development must accompany the approv
Very truly yours,
~~
John F. H stings
Senior Development Officer
also provides that the
resolution, approve the
desire to approve the
approval be in the form
he resolution approving
al form.
cc: Ronald E. Sweeney
Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator
~ 3G-55.39. Procedure prior to financinf; of housint; developments
undertaken by housint,* sponsors. - e~. Notwithstan(iing any outer provi-
sion of this chapter. }lD:~ is not empowered to finance any housing
development undertaken by a housinl; sponsor pursuant to ~~ 3G-;15.31,
36-55.33:1 and 3G-55.3.1:1 of this chapter unless, prior to the financing of any
housing development hereunder, IIU~1 finds:
(1) That there exists ;t shortage of decent, safe and sanitary housing at
rentals or prices which persons and families of low income or rnodera,e income
can at~ford within the general housing market area to be served by the proposed
housing development.
(2) That private enterprise and investment have been unable, without assis-
tance, to provide the needed decent, sa('e and sanitary housutg at rentals or
prices which persons or families of low and moderate income can ati•ord or to
provide sufTicrent mortgage financing for residential housing for occupancy by
such nersorts or families.
(3) That the housing sponsor or sponsors undertaking the proposed housing
development in this Commomvealth will supply well-planncci, well-cic;tgned
housing for persons or families of low and moderate income and that such
sponsors are financially responsible.
(~1) 'That the housinl; dcveloprnent, to be assisted pursuant to the ln•n,,'isions
of this chapter, will be of public use and will provide ;t public hens,tit.
(5) That t}te housing development will be undertaken wtthtn the ,,uti;,,nt}•
conferred by this chapter ulion iiD:1 and the housing sponsor ur sponsors.
B. Illl:~ shall also find, in connection with the financing of the r.e',v con-
struction or substantial rehabilitation of any proposed multi-(arniiy reside.^.ttaj
housutg development, that the governing body of the locaiit; in :vh:~it such
housing development is to be located has not, within sixty days after •.vntten
notification of the proposed tinancirtg has been sent the governing ;,~;,<<• by
IID:1, certified to IID~~ in writing its disapproval of the proposed rnuiti-t;un;ly
residential housing development. The Cored-oing notwithstandint,', ; o such
finding need be made if IID:1 s}tail have received t•rom the governing bod•: its
certtfied resolution approving the proposed housing deveiopr,;ent. ! 1J7~, c. a30;
1915, c. 53g; 1973, c. '?J7; 1J5.~., c. 175.)
The I`JiR nm~nclment designated the The 1518°_ nmcndment ac:dcd the seeor,d sen-
Cormer proccsions nCthic sec!ion as subsec!on A !epee of subsection ii.
and udded subsection D.
r ~~
VIRGINIA
HOUSING
DEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY JOHN RITCHIE, JR.
Executive Olrector
13 SOUTH 13TH STREET RICHMOND VIRGINIA 23219-4188 TELEPHONE 804/782-1986
March 9, 1989
The Honorable Lee Garrett
Chairman
Roanoke County
PO Box 29800
Roanoke, VA 24018-0798
RE: Grouse Pointe Apartments
Roanoke County
Dear Chairman Garrett:
Pursuant to Section 36-55.39(B) of the Code of Virginia, a copy
of which is enclosed, you are hereby notified that the Virginia
Housing Development Authority is considering the financing of
the multi-family residential housing development described in
the enclosed Attachment "A", which is to be situated in your
locality. Should you desire additional information regarding
the development proposal, please contact Mr. Ronald E. Sweeney,-
Senior Vice President, Sovran Mortgage Corporation, PO Box 466,
Richmond, VA 23203-0466.
If you desire to disapprove the development proposal, you may do
so by certifying to the Authority in writing within sixty days of
the date hereof. A certified copy of any resolution disapproving
the development proposal should accompany the above certifi-
cation. We would ask that any such certification be in the form
attached hereto though the statement of any reasons for your
action is optional.
You will note that Section 36-55.39(B) also provides that the
governing body of a locality may, by resolution, approve the
proposed housing development. If you desire to approve the
development, we would ask that such approval be in the form
attached hereto. A certified copy of the resolution approving
the development must accompany the approval form.
Very truly yours,
1_
John F. H stings
Senior Development Officer
cc: Ronald E. Sweeney
Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator
§ 3G-55.39. Procedure prior to financing of housing; developments
undertaken by housint,* sponsors. - A. Notwithstanciint; any ocher provi-
sion of this chapter, I-ID:~ is not empowered to finance any housing
development undertaken by a housing sponsor pursuant to §~ 3G-;15.31,
36-55.33:1 and 3G-75.3.1:1 of this chapter unless, prior to the financing of any
housing development hereunder, IID~1 finds:
(1) That there exists r: shDr•t:r~;e of decent. safe and sanitary housint; at
rentals or prices which persons anti families of low income or rnocierate income
can at~ord within the general housing market area to be served by the proposed
housing development.
(2) That private enterprise Ind investment have been unable, without assis-
tance, to provide the needed decent, safe and sanitary housing at rentals or
prices which persons or families of low and moderate income can auor'd or to
provide sufficient mortgage financing for residentral housing for occupancy by
such nersons or families.
(3) That the housing sponsor or sponsors undertakine the pronDSed !;Dosing
development in this Commonwealth will supply well-planned, well-cie;ir;ncd
housin~~ for persons or families of low and moderate income and t:.at such
sponsors are financially responsible.
(4) 'That the housing development to be assisted pursuant to the provisrons
of this chapter, will be of public use and will provide a public henc,iit.
(~) '[hat the housing development will be undertaken wrihrn r1;,~ ,,:;,;;,,; ray
conferred by this chapter ul;on IiDr1 and the housin; sponsor ur sponsors.
B. IID:1 shall also Lind, in connection with the tlnancin~ of the r.e~,v con-
struction or substantial rehai~ilitation ofanv propDSed multi-farnii}' resrcentr:rl
housu:g development, that t};e s~overnin body of Lie }ocaiit: in tviu~;:
housin~~ development is to be located has not, within sixty days after •,~~n\tten
nDtitication of the proposed tinancir,g has been sent the ~overnrng bn„~v by
IlD:1, certiticd to IID~1 in writing its disapproval of the pro ~oseci rnuiti-farnriy
resrdential housing development. The fore:,•oing notwithstanding• r;o such
finciir.g need be made if IID:~ s}:ail have received from the governing bod•: its
1J7t5ircu resolution cpp~~.ing t~;e propDSed housins deveiopr,;cr.t. ;1J ~ ~, D,
c. G3G; 97~ ~ 1J5.., c. 175.) X30;
The tDiA nm~ndmcne dcsi~i:Ztea ;;~e The 1S1A°_ :uncndrtient ac:~cd the second sen-
Cormer prop isions nClh~s seceton as subsection A fence of suUSecuon U.
and uuded subsccuon f3.
ACTION 4k A-5989-12.f
ITEM NUMBER
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: May 9, 1989
AGENDA ITEM:
Acceptance of a sanitary sewer easement being
donated by K. Rae Martin and Sherry W. Martin on
Lot 27, Block 3, Section 2, Kingston Court
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
K. Rae Martin and Sherry W. Martin have agreed to donate to
the County an easement for the location and construction of a
sanitary sewer line. The easement is located in the Cave Spring
Magisterial District on Lot 27, Block 3, Section 2, Kingston
Court and is more particularly shown on the attached plat pre-
pared by Buford T. Lumsden and Associates,'P.C. Engineers and
Surveyors, dated December 13, 1988.
Pursuant to Ordinance 102787-4 adopted on October 27, 1987,
the Board authorized the County Administrator to accept donations
or dedications of noncontroversial real estate matters.
FISCAL IMPACTS:
None.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the Board favorably consider this
acceptance by resolution under the consent agenda.
Respectfully submitted,
~~ /~
Sarah A. Rice
Assistant County Attorney
L-~'
---------------------------------- VOTE
---------------- ACTION No Yes Abs
T T~rns~n~Ha-~yGarrett
Approved ( ~ Motion by: Bob _ X
C. Nick Johnson x
Denied ( ~ agent
Received ( ) McGraw
Nickens x
Referred x
To Robers
cc: File
Paul Mahoney, County Attorney
Cliff Craig, Director, Utilities
Phillip Henry, Director, Engineering
- ~~
pF h6G 1,0T Z9 L r 8
M K1D~ oN P6Uhs .
Py, lp EXIhTINd 10~ SANITARY 6fWER EAbFMENT
h.3Z'07'00"W.-~- EX)5T ZO'ptZq/NAGE &ASfMfNT
82136'
t;xIST. ib' 4•s•E
~ Io' NEW SANITARY
SEWER EASEMENT o
0
4ot 26 ,°o o GoT 27 0 ~ Got ZB
0
~ °o o ~•
i` ~ Z
r ~
• lExrgT.3o'Mr3.c.
EXIST. -b'PUll.UTIGITV ElMT.
8$.36'
- ~ -- N.3Z'07'00"E.
~~ENTWOOn . Got~~r, ~.W
tio' a~w
PLAT SHOWING
NEW SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT.
BEING GRANTED TO
• ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
$Y '
q,~t, lid K. RAE & SHERRY W. MARTIN
`
~C SITUATED ON LOT. Z7 , BLOCK 3, SECTION 2
B. LEE ~Z KINGSTON COURT (P.B, 10, PAGE 58)
HENDEFZSON, JR.~ ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA
~~ ~ KALE: 1" = 20' DATE: 13 DECEMBER 1988
14130
~
~O
lUxV BUFORD T. LUMSDEN 6- ASSOCIATES, P. C.
ENOINEERB-BURVEYORB
ROANOK~, VIRGINIA
• #6b•33
IZ'1°~ 3~
L-X
a
r
h L.. _ ~
MEa1~lA oN ~o~at GoT 29
N ~,,~tGS ~,~,h6
P p~,10 EX15T f NG (0 ~ 5AN1 TAt~ y SEWER EAhEM~NT
~i. 3Z°O7'OO"W -~- EX15T. ZO` pagINAGE EASEMENT
I $3.36'
Ex~S T 15' S. 5, E
-i-
Gor 26
~.4",Y r~pl:~ V
t0' NEW 6ANITAaY
+ 5r; WEa EASEMENT
w
o GOr Z7
M ~
~ O
h ti
0
0 0
o
b
O ~
~,
`~xl5r. 3o'M,G, c.
~EX15T. 14't'UH, UTIGIT M'
YES T.
-- N.3Z°O7'DO''E
Lor as
-- _ .,~,
~/- /
COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA
CAPITAL FUND - UNAPPROPRIATID BALANCE
Beginning Balance at July 1, 1988 $12,644
Additional Amount from 1988-89 Budget 50,000
November 22, 1988 Improvements at Administrative Center (6,450)
Balance as of May 9, 1989 56 194
Su~nitted by
~~~~ ~. ~~
Diane D. Hyatt
Director of Finance
COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA
RESERVE FOR BQARD CONTINGENCY
Original Budget at July 1, 1988 $50,000
June 28, 1988 Funding of Length of Service Benefit
for Volunteer Fire, Rescue, and
Auxiliary Sheriff's Deputies (9,000)
July 26, 1988 Tweed's Access Road (39,405)
September 13, 1988 Add to Board Contingency from
Unappropriated Balance 50,000
September 26, 1988 Beautification of Brambleton Avenue (3,500)
September 28, 1988 Economic Development Trip to Northern
Virginia (Approved Administratively) (1,000)
October 6, 1988 Typewriter for Clerk of Courts
(Approved Administratively) (966)
October 6, 1988 Economic Development Promotion
(Approved Administratively) (1,025)
October 11, 1988 Safekeeping of Securities (2,000)
Octo'oer 20, 1988 Informational Brochure for November
Election (Approved Administratively) (6,500)
October 25, 1988 Additional Allocation to Total Action
Against Poverty (TAP) (10,000)
November 3, 1988 Survey Fees - Safety Center and
Forensics Lab Site (Approved
Administratively) (2,473)
November 9, 1988 Bushdale Road (1,000)
December 13, 1988 C. L. & O. Investors (365)
December 20, 1988 Stonebridge Park Parking Lot
(Approved Administratively) (5,000)
January 10, 1989 Salaries for Board of Zoning Appeals (625)
January 24, 1989 Contribution to Arts Festival (1,000)
January 24, 1989 Sesquicentennial History Books (300)
Balance as of May 9, 1989 15 841
Submitted by
Diane D. Hyatt
Director of Finance
N - ,~
COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA
UNAPPROPRIATED BALANCE - GFNFRAT. FUND
Balance at July 1, 1988 $3,037,141
August 9, 1988 Dixie Caverns Landfill Cleanup (400,000)
September 13, 1988 Transfer to Board Contingency (50,000)
September 26, 1988 Design Phase of Spring Hollow
Reservoir (175,000)
October 25, 1988 Funding for Public Information
Officer (46,500)
November 9, 1988 Dixie Caverns Landfill Cleanup (260,000)
November 22, 1988 Lease Additional Office Space (34,783)
February 28, 1989 Primary Election Expenses (23,855)
April 25, 1989 County Administrator's Vehicle (14,685)
April 25, 1989 All American City Expenditures (20,000)
Balance as of May 9, 1989 $2,012,318
Submitted by
~~. ~~.-~
Diane D. Hyatt
Director of Finance
o-~
ROANOKE COUNTY
75/25 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT POLICY
UPDATE
INVENTORY OF ASSETS
RECOMMENDATIONS
ON-GOING ACTIVITIES
May 9, 1989
ACTION #
ITEM NUMBER ~-'~
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: May 9, 1989
AGENDA ITEM: 75/25 Economic Development Strategy
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: /' ~` ~ ~~~,~.
~.~, ~irs r~z .~r.~/ c y ~,,, l..v
BACKGROUND
Staff made a presentation at the March 28, 1989 Board of Super-
visors meeting ;regarding the status of the 75/25 policy adopted
by the Board of Supervisors in early 1987. The Board of Super-
visors requested that a specific action plan be developed within
sixty (60) days to address the economic development efforts to
achieve a 75~ residential/25$ commercial/industrial tax base
ratio before the year 2003. The attached report makes specific
recommendations about site development, marketing efforts and
industrial land use to implement the 75/25 strategy.
FISCAL IMPACT
The Board has identified $100,000 in the FY 89-90 budget for an
economic development project.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors adopt the 75/25
economic development strategy report as their action plan and
implement its recommendations.
SUBMITTED BY:
~_ / ~.
Timoth W. Guba a, Director
Economic Development
Approved
Denied
Received
Referred
To
Motion by:
ACTION
APPROVED BY:
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
VOTE
No Yes Abs
Garrett
Johnson
McGraw
Nickens
Robers
Attachment
Q -- /
A, Update of current economic development activity
Economic Development activity has picked up in Roanoke County
this spring. Site plans, building permits and new business
announcements are enumerated by square footage on Table 1. Some
of the more significant activities are:
Dosinion Bankshares Corporation has filed a preliminary plan for
a 141,500 square foot, four story addition at their operations
center on Plantation Road. They plan to make a capital
expenditure between $5 and $10 million over the next year. This
will serve present and future needs for the Operations Center.
ITT (Electro-Optical Division) has received a building permit and
started construction of a 5,000 square foot tpaufacturing building
at their complex in Jamison Industrial Park.
Kroger has obtained a building permit and started construction on
a 42,500 square foot addition to the frozen storage facility at
their complex in the Glenvar area.
b
~ro' companies have purchased land in Roanoke County's Southwest
Industrial Park.
-Insulation Systems will construct a 20,000 square foot
building and employ ten (10) to store and distribute
commercial insulation material.
1
c~-- /
-Nelson Brumfield will construct a 10,000 square foot
building and employ six (6) to manufacture kitchen counters
and cabinets.
~, '~';~
''~ ~~ ~ for the purchase of 1 .46 acres for
~$~.o_p-o s a I i s~ -}se n-d~ i-~r$ ,
the construction of a 10,000 square foot industrial
incubator in Southwest Industrial Park.
The vacant Moore's building on Brambleton Avenue has been
sold to Roanoke Memorial for a clinic. Rennovations are
anticipated during the summer of 1989.
The 419 corridor has the following projects under construction:
-A 60,000 square foot office building in Colonnade Corporate
Center
-A 26,294 square foot office building by Hong Ki Min
-Virginia First Savings and Loan Branch at 419 and
Chaparral.
-Sleep Inn, a 104 room motel near Tanglewood Mall
-Fralin and Waldron's Building "F" (47,700 square feet),
five stories
Two companies have located in the Vinton Industrial Park
-American Profiles located a 26,600 square foot facility
to manufacture veneer for (wood) moldings; employs 50.
2
D-/
-Boxley Construction has relocated 70 employees into its
6,000 square foot complex from the City of Roanoke.
TABLE 1
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES - MAY 1989
Buildin permits
Site plans issued and under
filed
construction
Office
buildings
in square 3 @ 127,294
feet 9 @ 256,b43
Industrial
buildings
in square 5 @ 70,435
feet 2 @ 20,800
Other
commercial 6 @ 57,679
uses 4 @ 51,581
Total 15 @ 329,024 14 @ 255,408
-' e 2
Since January 1, 1989, the County staff has obtained fourteen
(14) prospects from the following sources:
Regional Partnership 2
Local realtors ~' ~
,,., . .. ~
Local7,,contact~s ~
Northern Virginia Marketing 1
Direct call 1
1 ~,
All prospects are looking for "ready to go" industrial sites.
Specific needs of each prospect are on file (confidential) with
the Department of Economic Development.
3
~-i
B, Inventory of assets
In order for Roanoke County to have continued economic growth,
the following County level assets are required:
o Available, "ready to go" industrial sites using proper
zoning, water, sewer and road access.
o Marketing Strategy with up to date marketing material
i.e., brochure, profile, marketing book.
o A positive attitude and problem-solving methods to
handling the concerns of local business and industry as
they expand operations within the community.
o Full-time, professional economic development staff at the
local and regional level.
These four assets are further described in their current
condition below:
1. Need for "ready to go" industrial sites
During the preparation of Roanoke County's Comprehensive
Plan, a 1984 land use survey determined that there were
997 acres of land used as industrial.
During the five year interval, another 122 acres was
rezoned to industrial M1 or M2 (according to Planning
4
~ -~
Commission Annual Reports) giving Roanoke County a
theoretical inventory of 1119 acres of industrial used
land.
This inventory is not realistic because of the following
reasons:
a. Land use - the land included as being zoned, encompasses
all industrial land used for its intended purposes.
Therefore, large acreage tracts owned by such companies
as Ingersoll-Rand (98 ac) and Koppers (89 ac) are
industrially zoned and under single ownership even
though a large portion of the property may be vacant.
According to Roanoke County's real estate tax records,
there are actually 457 parcels of 2201.34 acres zoned
industrial in the county and 146.p7 acres in Vinton.
This is more than double the estimated figure of land
used for industrial and implies that over 1100 acres of
industrial land is vacant.
b. Floodplain - A majority of the industrially zoned land
in western Roanoke County is adjacent to the Roanoke
River. Floods in both 1968 and 1972 were recorded and
have been indicated on U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
floodplain maps. This flooding threat has eliminated
several large west county parcels from consideration as
unrestricted industrial sites.
c. Access - Access to a primary highway is an important
consideration for property to be used for industrial
5
~- /
purposes due to terrain, highway locations in the County
and past land use patterns, land zoned industrial has
serious access limitations in Roanoke County. For
instance;
1) A potential 287 acre site in Eastern Roanoke
County has only one access point along a narrow
secondary road that crosses Norfolk/Southern railroad
tracks at an unguarded crossing.
2) A 163 acre site in northern Roanoke County with
interstate frontage has no direct access to a
secondary road.
3) A 15 rail site in western Roanoke County has a
narrow easement as an access means across other
property.
d. Availability - Owners of industrial zoned land are not
always willing to sell the land for its intended use at
a favorable price. For example, 285 acres of industrial
land are classified in a land use category, according to
County real estate records, thus guaranteeing them a
lower assessed value and tax rate. However, they are
subject to "roll back" taxes for five preceeding years
upon sale of the property.
e. Industrial zoning - Roanoke County's Zoning Ordinance
includes a variety of uses under the categories of M-1,
M-2 and M-3. Basically, M-1 permitted uses are "light"
industrial uses generally carried on within a structure.
Permitted uses in M-2 are "heavy" and are carried on
6
~-/
both within a structure and outside on the property.
Quarries, mining and asphalt plans are the only uses
allowed in the M-3 District.
The permitted uses include not only manufacturing,
assembly and processing descriptions, but wholesale
business and public utilities. Certain "unwanted" land
uses are included in the industrial category, i.e. flea
markets, automobile graveyards, veterinary hospitals,
commercial kennels, used tire storage.
The rezoning records indicate that property is being rezoned to
industrial for specific uses.
Including rezonings for APCo (36 acres) and Valleypointe (52
acres) in the fall of 1987, only 122 acres have been rezoned to
M-1 or M-2 since 1984. Other rezonings to M-1 have been for
small business such as:
Mini-warehouses
Electronic components assembly for South Star Corporation
Ceramics shops
Automobile repair business
American Drum's musical instrument assembly
Lumber drying business
Contractor's equipment storage yard
f. Future Industrial Sites
A study completed by the Salem-Roanoke County Chamber of
Commerce in 1980 and updated in 1985 by the County staff
7
~_
indicates that land is zoned for other uses,
particularly residential, that could be rezoned and
eventually marketed as industrial sites. These sites
have excellent potential for residential development.
A report will be prepared in July 1989 to analyze and
rank selected residential sites and recommend to the
Board of Supervisors that they be rezoned to Industrial
District M-1. This action could add 1,420 acres to the
available industrial site inventory and protect them
from residential development. This acreage combined
with improvements in access and extensions of water and
sewer could provide the County with sufficient inventory
for future economic growth.
g. "Ready to go" sites ,
"Ready to go" industrial sites are those sites that have
the following characteristics:
1. appropriate industrial zoning
2. Access to adequate roads
3. Water service at site
4. Sewer service at site
5. Available for sale with established price.
Of all the 2,201 acres currently zoned industrial in
Vinton and Roanoke County, only 195.5 acres meet the
requirements of being a "ready to go" site. These sites
have been recorded with the Virginia Department of
Economic Development, Regional Partnership and
industrial realtors. Table 2 indicates specifics of
these sites.
8
"`
TABLE 2
Site name
Acrea "Ready to Go" Industrial Sites
ge Location Zoning
Notes
Shimchocks 7.8 Hollins Road M1 To be subdivided
D ~ M 7 Peters Creek Blp ~ For lease
Leonard Hill 11.4 W. Main Street M1 Sewer to be extended
Rt. 11/460 during 1989
Fort Lewis Industrial ~~,r~ W. Main Street M2 Two 5.5 acre parcels
Park
Krueger Metal 27 Off Rt. 11/460 M1 Krueger wants to retain
17 acres and sell 10
Jamison Industrial
Park 4.5 Plantation Road M1
Roanoke/Botetourt
Industrial Park 43 Route 11/460 East M1
Valleypointe 55 Peters Creek Road M1
I-581
Austin Tract 4.5 Hollins Road M2
Vinton Industrial Park 19.5 Third Street M1
Vinton
Southwest Industrial 4.8 Southwest County M1
Park
Total 195.5
h. Sites havin¢ deficiencies
Asking price may be too
high
Tweeds site (25 ac) is
adjacent
12 acres being developed
at present park at
Valleypointe
Vacant
Two tracts of 14.5
and 5.0
Two parcels available
Land currently zoned industrial is remaining vacant,
indicating that there are other factors affecting its
development for the use intended.
There are a number of industrial sites in Roanoke County
9
. d-/
that are less than "ready to go" because of one or more
deficiencies. These include 382 acres of industrial
zoned land. Table 3 indicates these tracts and the
deficiencies that they have. Water and sewer service is
not available to some sites and access is a problem for
others. However, planning for water and sewer service
has progressed for several of these properties. Access
improvements for a number of other properties were
addressed as the 1988 update of the Six Year Secondary
Road plan but received lower ratings as being new
projects. Future emphasis on improving both secondary
road access and primary roads to serve industrial sites
will contribute towards improvement of the inventory of
industrial land.
Table 3
Sites having Deficiences
Site name Acreage Location Zoning Notes
Adams Construction 175 I-81 M2/M3 Lacks water,
Valleypointe, sewer
(Phase II)
Hollins College 163 I-81 M1 Lacks water,
access
Starkey 10.5 Starkey Rd. M2 Lacks water,
sewer, access
Roanoke Ready
Mix 34 Benois Road M1 Lacks water,
sewer, access
Total acreage 382.5
10
D- /
2. Marketing Strategy
The fiscal year 1989-90 budget contains $23,500 in funds for the
economic development staff to initiate a marketing effort, both
in state for name recognition and out of state industrial access
prospects. This activity includes:
a. Preparation of Marketing Materials - In order to
effectively market the County, up to date published
marketing material is required. This includes a new
brochure, community profile and updated material for the
marketing book. Three thousand dollars ($3,000) has
been identified in the FY 89-90 budget to complete these
tasks.
b. Advertising - Prior to, and in conjunction with
marketing trips out of state, selected advertisements
will be made in regional and trade publications to
support the prospective efforts. Widespread reference
to the All-American City program will highlight the
effort.
c. Prospect trips - Four out of state marketing trips are
scheduled to market Roanoke County and the Valley. The
midwest and northeast are preliminary target areas.
Trips may be made in conjunction with the
Regional Partnership.
d. Trade Show Participation - Technology trade shows bring
together a variety of companies in one location. The
strategy will be to identify expanding industries and
seek to have them locate in Roanoke County.
11
D-/
e. 'Economic bridges with Northern Virginia - Three
marketing trips are planned for building "economic
bridges" between Northern Virginia and the Roanoke
Valley. These will follow up on the Roanoke Valley's
visit in September 1988 and two subsequent marketing
trips. A return visit from Northern Virginia business
leaders is being planned for September 1989.
3. Positive attitude and methods
The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors and top administrative
officials have a pro-business image that encourages new business
locations and local companies to expand. However, this attitude
needs to be instilled within the "rank and file" of County staff.
Due to many changes in the development process; including fees,
County standards and state mandated inspection items, local
businesses get frustrated when they seek to obtain permits to
expand and enlarge their operations. The availability of
information at the onset is needed so that realistic schedules
can be developed to complete the project.
The following actions are recommended to either be continued, or
to be initiated to alleviate "frustration" with the development
process.
a. informational brochures outlining County requirements
and regulations for site plans, building permits
b. Scheduling of preliminary meetings to respond to
preliminary plans.
12
a-i
c. U'se of economic development staff as "mediators" where
conflict and misunderstanding occurs.
~ . ~'~.
d. Training of development review team in public relations.•'
~, r E,~
e. "Expediting" critical economic development projects to `'
guarantee a five day review period on plans submitted. -'r!''
.. ~.
4. Full-time staff
~. ~, ~
Success in economic development requires that full-time staff be
assigned to the Department of Economic Development in order to
carry out the work program approved in the budget. Currently,
two professional economic developers and one professional
secretary are assigned. This is an increase from 1982 when
economic development had one-half time staff emphasis. Starting
in 1984, the first full-time staff member was assigned and
finally in April 1988, the Economic Development Department was
organized with three (3) people assigned full-time duties.
Implementation of the approved work program will occupy all three
staff members through the next fiscal year in marketing and out
of state trips.
Support of Roanoke County's efforts at the regional level is
provided by County participation in the Regional Partnership and
a financial contribution of $68,182. These funds are used for
representing and marketing the Roanoke Valley to prospects
outside the area.
Financial support of $25,000 is provided to the Roanoke Valley
Convention and Visitors Bureau for tourism and convention
bookings. The Bureau promotes the Valley in travel publications,
solicits meeting planners to hold conventions and conferences
here and operates a visitor center in the downtown market area.
13
~ -/
C. Program Recommendations to achieve 75/25
Specific recommendations to change the composition of Roanoke
County's tax base to 75X residential and 25X commercial/industrial
to achieve a balance between the residential and commercial/indus-
trial sectors by the year 1995 as follows:
1. Increase the supply of "ready to go" industrial sites by
pursuing one of the following alternatives with the
$100,000 approved by the Board of Supervisors.
a. County participation in the development of a 45 acre
site in Eastern Roanoke County.
b. County participation in the purc~iase and development
of a 50 acre rail site in Roanoke County.
c. County participation in the development of either of
two I-S1 sites of 50 and 35 acres.
d. County participation in the development of a 27 acre
industrial site in Western Roanoke County.
2. Participation in the Virginia Shell building program to
obtain funds to construct a shell building on a site in
Roanoke County.
14
D- /
3. Recognize the need for future economic growth by reserving
through rezoning to industrial/commercial, prime sites
that may be currently zoned as residential or agricultural.
A study will be completed during July 1989 and a report
made to the Board analyzing and ranking the sites to be
rezoned.
4. Formation of an advisory economic development council.
5. Increase in marketing efforts to "sell" Roanoke County
both within and outside the Commonwealth of Virginia.
D. Ongoing activities in the area of economic development to
meet goal of 75X residential and 25% commercial/industrial include:
-Completion of Valleypointe, Phase I (5S acres)
-County participation in the development of Valleypointe,
Phase II, (175 acres).
-County marketing of existing, vacant industrial sites in
the Vinton Industrial Park, Roanoke-Botetourt Industrial
Park and Fort Lewis Industrial Park (100 acres).
-Promoting the Explore Project as the tourism destination
point of the Roanoke Valley.
-Encouraging the development of a travel and tourism
"infrastructure" (hotels, motels, and restaurants) in
Roanoke County.
15
of aoANO,~~
~~ ;
ti p
2 G1
~ 2
O
as
E5~ $$
SFSQUICEN7ENN~P~
A Beauti~ulBcginnixg
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
ELMER C. HODGE
Mayor Charles R. Hill
Town of Vinton
P. O. Box 338
Vinton, Virginia 24179
Dear Mayor Hill:
May 12, 1989
LEE GARRETT. CHAIRMAN
WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
RICHARD W. ROBERS, VICE-CHAIRMAN
CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
BOB L. JOHNSON
HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
STEVEN A. MCGRAW
CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
HARRY C. NICKENS
VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
Attached is a copy of Resolution No. 5989-6, authorizing the
donation of Parcel 1, Tract 3, C. L. Bush Estates, consisting of
.98 acre to the Town of Vinton. This resolution was adopted by
the Board of Supervisors at their meeting on Tuesday, May 9,
1989.
If you need further information, please do not hesitate to
contact me.
Sincerely,
bjh
Attachment
C~nixnt~ of ~vttn~rk~e
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24018-07 9 8 (703) 772-2004
O~ POANO,y.F
a ~
ti p
Z
z
v a
150 0
1 H YEARS $$
SFSQUICENTENN~P~
A Beauti~ul Beginning
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
ELMER C. HODGE
LEE GARRETT. CHAIRMAN
WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
RICHARD W. ROBERS. VICE-CHAIRMAN
CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
BOB L. JOHNSON
HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
May 12 , 19 8 9 STEVEN A. MCGRAW
CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
HARRY C. NICKENS
VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
Rev. Mark Graham
St. John's Lutheran Church
4808 Brambleton Avenue
Roanoke, Virginia 24018
Dear Reverend Graham:
On behalf of the Board of Supervisors, I would like to take this
opportunity to let you know of our appreciation for your
attending the meeting on Tuesday, May 9, 1989 to offer the
invocation.
We feel it is most important to ask God's blessing on these
meetings so that all is done according to His will and for the
good of all citizens.
Thank you again for sharing your time with us.
bjh
C~nunt~ of ~uttnoke
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
Very ruly yours,
~~ ~-~
Le Garrett, Chairman
Ro noke County Board of Supervisors
P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24018-0798 (703) 772-2004
O~ ROANp,1.~
a
~.
Z
.p
~
v 2
a
18 E50 88
SFSQUICENTENN~P~
A Beauti~ul Beginning
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
ELMER C. HODGE
C~nixn~~ n~ ~nttnakr
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
May 12, 1989
Winnie Krasnow
Chairman
Better Beginnings
P. 0. Box 11991
Roanoke, Virginia
Dear Winnie:
Coalition
24022
LEE GARRETT. CHAIRMAN
WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
RICHARD W. ROBERS. VICE-CHAIRMAN
CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
BOB L. JOHNSON
HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
STEVEN A. MCGRAW
CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
HARRY C. NICKENS
VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
Attached is a copy of Action No. 5989-5, recommending
appropriation of $500 for Roanoke County's share of the planning
session which you are sponsoring. This action was taken by the
Board of Supervisors at their meeting on May 9, 1989.
If you need further information, please do not hesitate to
contact me.
Sincerely,
Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
bjh
Attachment
cc: Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance
Dr. Molly L. Hagan, Director, Alleghany Health District
P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 2 4018-07 9 8 (703) 772-2004
o~P AN~,~
~ p
Z
~ 2
0
a
18 .'~~ 88
'SFgQU1CENTENN~P~
A Btauti~ul8tginning
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
ELMER C. HODGE
May 12, 1989
Dr. Fred P. Roessel, Jr.
Executive Director
Mental Health Services of the Roanoke Valley
301 Elm Avenue, S.W.
Roanoke, Virginia 24016-4026
Dear Dr. Roessel:
LEE GARRETT. CHAIRMAN
WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
RICHARD W. ROBERS. VICE-CHAIRMAN
CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
BOB L. JOHNSON
HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
STEVEN A. MCGRAW
CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
HARRY C. NICKENS
VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
Attached is a copy of Resolution No. 5989-12.e, supporting the
request of Craig County to become a member of the Mental Health
Services of the Roanoke Valley. This resolution was adopted by
the Board of Supervisors at their meeting on Tuesday, May 9,
1989.
If you need further information, please do not hesitate to
contact me.
Sincerely,
Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
bjh
Attachment
cc: Jeffrey D. Johnson, County Administrator, Craig County
(naunf~ of i~attnnkr
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 2 4018-07 9 8 (703> 772-2004
~p AN,~.~
L
ti p
Z
a~
18 ~ 88
$FSQbiCENTENN~P~
A Bcauti~ulBcginning
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
ELMER C. HODGE
Cnuunfg of iRnttna~e
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
May 12, 1989
Ms. Ann E. Weaver
Executive Director
Clean Valley Council
P. O. Box 3320
Roanoke, Virginia 24015
Dear Ms. Weaver:
LEE GARRETT, CHAIRMAN
WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
RICHARD W. ROBERS. VICE-CHAIRMAN
CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
BOB L. JOHNSON
HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
STEVEN A. MCGRAW
CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
HARRY C. NICKENS
VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
Attached is a copy of Resolution No. 5989-12.b, authorizing the
Clean Valley Council to apply for an anti-litter program grant
for Roanoke County. This resolution was adopted by the Board of
Supervisors at their meeting on Tuesday, May 9, 1989.
If you need further information, please do not hesitate to
contact me.
Sincerely,
`>n.~a- .3J. Q.~ may,
Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
bjh
Attachment
cc: Clerk, City of Roanoke
Clerk, City of Salem
Clerk, Town of Vinton
Clerk, County of Botetourt
P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24018-0798 (703) 772-2004
~~
,e
~"`
.,~°:
,., f
'may ;x~c,'.
~~
r
~~
~~
L
.r:..,$$$~.v.
~..~ ,yam
~~ ~ ~
~-`
o~ gOAN ~
F
~ .A 9
~ 2
v a~
18 ~~ 88
S~SQUICENTENN~p~
A Beauri~u/Beginning
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
ELMER C. HODGE
T0:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
~A~II~t~ II~ ~IIM1TLI~P
M E M O RAN D U M
Skip Burkart, Commonwealth's Attorney
Sh~eCi~f Michael Kavanaugh
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
May 1, 1989
Work Session
Anti-cruise ordinance
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
LEE GARRETT. CHAIRMAN
WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
RICHARD W. ROBERS. VICE-CHAIRMAN
CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
BOB L. JOHNSON
NOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
STEVEN A. MCGRAW
CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
HARRY C. NICKENS
VIN TON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
At the suggestion of Supervisor Bob Johnson, the County
Attorney's office has drafted an anti-cruise ordinance in an
effort to attempt to alleviate some of the problems that exist
along Williamson Road.
The Board of Supervisors has set a
to discuss this ordinance. I will
when the agrenda is finalized.
That Board has asked that I invite
session and to offer your suggestil
proposed ordinance. Attached is a
for your review.
work session on Tuesday, May 9
let you know the specific time
you to participate in the work
ins and comments on the
copy of the draft ordinance
I hope you will be able to attend. If you have questions
concerning the ordinance, please contact the County Attorney's
Office.
mha
P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24018-07 9 8 (703) 772-2004
DRAFT ORDINANCE
Sec.
When the volume of traffic on any residential street exceeds a
level which will permit continuous movement of traffic and ready
access by any police, fire, rescue, or other public safety vehicles to
all residences abutting such street, any law enforcement officer in
the county is hereby authorized to temporarily close such street to
any private vehicle for such period of time necessary to reduce traf-
fic flow to an acceptable level; provided that any motor vehicle oper-
ated by an individual whose driver's license indicates the driver re-
sides upon such street shall be permitted access during the period
such street is temporarily closed.
Sec. Limitations as to gross weight of vehicles permitted on certain
streets
It shall be unlawful to operate any vehicle upon the following
designated streets in Roanoke County where the gross weight on the
surface of the road through any axle of such vehicle exceeds
thousand pounds:
LIST
On any street where the weight of vehicles permitted on such
street is limited by ordinance and signs indicating such limitations
are posted, it shall be unlawful `to operate a vehicle in excess of
such weight on such street,except for the purpose of making delivery
or picking up a load, in which case such vehicle may be driven on the
restricted street for not more than the minimum distance necessary for
the purpose.
Sec. Procedures for obtaining restrictions on residential streets
1. Upon the petition•of not less than two-thirds of the home-
owners abutting any residential street in the county, the board of
supervisors, after reviewing the recommendation of the zoning adminis-
trator, may approve any of the following procedures to control or lim-
it nonessential traffic upon a residential street:
-2-
a) establishment of one-way streets to promote the effi-
cient flow of traffic for the residents of such
streets;
b) installation of speed bumps or other physical altera-
tion of the surface of the street in such manner, num-
ber, and location as shall be jointly recommended by
the Department of Engineering and the Department of
Planning and Zoning;
c) physical barriers to control the manner of ingress and
egress to any residential street consistent with the
needs for access for public safety vehicles; and
d) restrictions against turns from a street or highway
across oncoming lanes of traffic into any residential
street.
2. Upon the petition of not less than two-thirds of the home-
owners abutting any residential street in the county, the board of
supervisors, after reviewing the recommendation o'f the zoning admin-
istrator, and after making a positive finding of fact of the existence
of any of the conditions set forth in subparagraph (b), shall estab-
lish one of the following limitations upon the volume of traffic and
hours of usage as follows:
a) between the"hours of 10:00 p.m. and 1:00 a.m. of the
following day, no more than one vehicle per minute
shall be permitted access to any residential street in
any one direction. During such period the speed limit
for such street shall be 15 m.p.h.
b) between the hours of 1:00 a.m. and 6:00 a.m., no more
than one vehicle per five minutes period shall be per-
mitted access to any residential street in any one
direction. During such period the speed limit for
such street shall be 15 m.p.h.
-3-
One of the following conditions must be met before the
board of supervisors shall approve one or more of the above
restrictions:
a) a family member residing in a dwelling abutting a resi-
dential street shall be afflicted with a diagnosed
physical, emotional, or psychological condition whose
symptoms may be judged with reasonable medical certain-
ty to be aggravated by noise, pollution, or other phys-
ical manifestations of excessive traffic on such
street. The diagnosis and prognosis shall be docu-
mented by the opinion of a licensed practitioner of
one of the healing arts.
b) twenty percent (20Z) of the residents of dwellings
abutting a residential street shall be seventy (7U)
years of age or older;
c) one-third (1/3) of the owners of property abutting a
residential street shall have documented evidence of
physical damage to their property 'exceeding
dollars in a one year period directly attributable to
excessive ~ raffic on that street;
d) excessive wear and tear to any residential street as a
result of excessive numbers or weights of vehicles
both on residential streets or as certified by the
county engineer.
Sec. Parking off paved portion of any street; exception
It shall be unlawful for any vehicle to be operated or parked
off of the paved or graded portion of any street or highway in the
county; except where such vehicle shall be parked or operated upon the
property owned by such operator or owner of the vehicle.
Sec. Driving while eating or drinking unlawful
It shall be unlawful for any person to operate any vehicle upon
any street restricted under section while eating any food, drink-
ing any beverage, or transporting any prepared food or opened beverage
in such vehicle.
-4-
Sec. Definitions
1. Gross weight - The total weight of any vehicle or combina-
tion of vehicles and the load or loads as defined by statute or ordin-
ante.
2. Park - To stand (stop) a vehicle whether occupied or not,
for a period of time greater than is reasonably necessary for the
actual loading or unloading.
3. Proyerty line - The line marking the boundary between any
street and the lots or property abutting thereon.
4. Residential street - Any street upon which not less than
three unattached dwellings for occupation by a family of two or more
abutt.
5. Street or highway - The entire width between property
lines or every way or place of whatever nature when any part thereof
is open to the use of the public as a matter of right, for the purpose
of vehicular traffic.
6. Vehicle - Every device in, upon or by which any person or
property is or may be transported or drawn upon ady street or highway
except devices moving by human power or used exclusively upon station-
ary rails or tracks. _
Sec. Severability
The sections, paragraphs, sentences,- clauses, and phrases of
this chapter are severable,.and if any phrase, clause, sentence, para-
graph, or section of this chapter shall be declared unconstitutional
or invalid by the valid judgment or decree of a court of competent
jurisdiction, the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs
and sections of this chapter shall remain valid.
O~ p,OANp~~
h ~
Z ~ ~ ~~ ~~~~~~.~
1838 ~~ 88
SESQVICEN7ENN~P~' DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES
A BeautifulBeginning
M E M O R A N D U M
T0: Betty Lucas
Director of Social Services
FROM: D: K. Cook ~~ /
Director of uman Resources
DATE: March 23, 1989
SUBJECT: Retirement Application - Letcher K. Morris
An employee in your department, Letcher K. Morris, has applied for
service retirement effective May 1, 1989. According to our records, Mr.
Morris will have more than 14 years of service with the county when he
retires.
The Board of Supervisors recognizes all employees who retire with
credible service with the county by adopting a resolution of
appreciation and presenting it to the retiring employee at a regular
board session.
Please complete the information on the draft resolution attached and
return it to Mary Allen in the County Administrator's office as soon as
possible. Any other information that you believe reflects the accom-
plishments or awards received by this employee should also be provided.
Thank you for your assistance in this matter. Please contact the Depart-
ment of Human Resources if you have any questions.
kkv
Attachment
c: Elmer C. Hodge
Mary Allen
INCZ'~E
SESSIQ1.IS OW 5 ~p~s ZITATIV~
FOR WORK CRUISE Og~.CITY
REQ~STS ON DTI A~ RO~OICE
E , ~ SESSIO S~RIFF .
~STED W ATTO~Y.
B n~0~~T8 S,~,v '~'M
general obligation school bonds to finance the purchase
of equipment for school purposes.
0-41189-10
HCN/RR TO APPROVE ORD
AND DISPENSE WITH 2ND READING
URC
S. CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS
1. SHARON SESSIONS, 2809 12 O'CLOCK KNOB ROAD,
REPRESENTATIVE OF CATAWBA LITTLE LEAGUE. CONCERNED ABOUT EXPIRATION
DATE OF 12/89 FOR USE OF FIELDS AT MCVITTY AND SHAMROCK PARK.
2. KEITH FRAZIER, 1910 QUEENSMILL DR. WAS CONCERNED ABOUT
THE CONTINUED AVAILABILITY OF FIELDS IN GLENVAR BEFORE GREEN HILL
FIELDS ARE READY FOR USE. HE REQUESTED THAT $100,000 BE ALLOCATED IN
THE BUDGET FOR UPGRADING OF FIELDS.
BLJ DIRECTED COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR TO MEET WITH RESIDENTS OF GLENVAR TO
FIND A SOLUTION AND REPORT BACK TO THE BOARD MEMBERS IN 30 DAYS (MAY
9TH MTG. )
T . ADJOURNMENT
BLJ/LG AT 9:15 P.M. - UW
f ~ ~~
~ ~9
8
O~ p,0AN0,1-F
~ ~
2
~ ,, tt
~~
~~
~~ ~'
~~~~~~~~
v a ~K
~~J•
1 V EIJio $$
`SEgQU1CENTENN~P~'
Al3tauti~ul&•~inrcinK BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
LEE GPJ~flETT. CHAIRMAN
WIN lJSt )I: III I.: '-. Ml.i.;;j TE RIAL DISTRICT
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RIC HARD w. ROBERS. VicE CHAIRMAN
ELMER C. HODGE CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
BOB L. JOHNSON
HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
STEVEN A. MCGRAW
CATAW BA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
HARRY C. NICKENS
VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
January 5, 1988
Rev. Mark Graham
St. John's Lutheran Church
4808 Brambleton Avenue, S.W.
Roanoke, Virginia 24018 ~'7t.~_Q~ J ~
Dear Reverend Graham:
On behalf of the Board of Supervisors, I would like to thank you
for giving the invocation at the Board of Supervisors' meeting in
the past.
We would again like to call on you to present the invocation on
Tuesday, May 9, 1989, at 3:00 p.m. If you are unable to do this,
please call me at 772-2005. I will be calling you soon to see if
this time is acceptable to you, or if you would prefer another
date.
The Board members are aware of how busy your schedule is, and
they appreciate your volunteering the time to offer God's
blessing at their meetings.
Sincerely,
Brenda J. Holton, Secretary
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOK~. VIRGINIA 24018-0798 (703) 772-2004.
NAYS-SAM, HCN
a
*' ~'~~'*'-' T~ThC a*II1 READING OF ORDINANCES
,-. " a
489-12. Petition of n~~ Heritage Corporation and RockYdale
Quarries Corporation to vacate portion of a 50-foot
right-of-way referred to as "North Mountain Drive",
Section 5, Southern Pines Subdivision, Cave Spring
Magisterial District.
NO ONE PRESENT TO SPEAK
RR/HCN TO APPROVE 1ST READING
2ND - 5/9/89
URC
489-13. Petition of Roy Lochner to vacate a 15-foot public
utility easement, between Lots 3 and 4, Block 1,
Section 1, Highfield Farms Subdivision, Windsor Hills
Magisterial District.
NO ONE PRESENT TO SPEAK
LG/HCN TO APPROVE 1ST READING
2ND - 5/9/89
URC
S. CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS
1. DEBORAH ZAMORASKI FINISHED PRESENTATION FROM 489-7 CONCERNING
OPPOSITION TO MATRIX SYSTEM ON LANDFILL
2. ROY LOCHNER SPOKE ABOUT UNDERGROUND WATER POSSIBILITIES AT
LANDFILL
PMM ASKED DIRECTION FROM BOARD ON CHANGES TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE
CONCERNING RESIDENTIAL DENSITY.
HCN REQUESTED REPORT SHOWING REZONINGS BASED ON DENSITY IN THE
PAST SIX MONTHS
~~/1nr T. ADJOURNMENT AT 9:45 P.M.
8
G .,F.... T ~ F RS T °°READ iNG Off` ORU3-~~i
~i-~~nance authorizing the donation of Parcel 1, Part
Tract 3, C. L. Bush Estate, containing .98 acre to the
Town of Vinton.
LG/RR TO APPROVE
1ST READING - URC
2ND - 5/9/89
2. Ordinance accepting an offer for and authorizing the
sale of 1.4 acres, more or less, in the Southwest
Industrial Park.
HCN/SAM TO APPROVE
1ST READING - URC
2ND - 5/9/89
3. Ordinance authorizing the lease of 10.40 acres of real
estate to John D. Willey.
BLJ/SAM TO APPROVE
1ST READING - URC
2ND - 5/9/89
H. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES
1. Ordinance amending Article II, "Virginia at wide Fir
`~~ Prevention Code," of Chapter 9,
prnte~t; .,., n Fire prr~yant i nn ~~
_., of the Roanoke County Code byVthevaddition
of Section F-318.1, " in Dever ~ Balconie,~."
BLJ/SAM TO
BRING BACK ON 5/9/89 WITH
CHANGES FOR 2ND READING
3
(''1 c~_r J ~ I I ~~
POANpY
OF ~
.w ~
Z
,_
J a
18~
`SFg 150; $$
~P~'
QV~CENTENN
.-1 BeautitulBeKinnin~
DIANE D. HYATT. CPA
DIRECTOR
April 20, 1989
Ms. Martha Plank
Roanoke Times and 'v17orld News
201-209 Campbell Avenue, S.w.
Roanoke, Virginia 24011
Dear Ms. Plank:
DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE
Please publish the enclosed notice, May 8, 1989 and May 15, 1989 in both the
morning and evening editions. Bill the cost of publication to:
County of Roanoke
Board of Supervisors
P. 0. Box 29800
Roanoke, Virginia 24018-0798
Sincerely,
Diane D. Hyatt
Director of Fiance ~~,~ ~, ~ .tI b
DDH: jls ~ ~~ q ~ Q,,,-{ r,
~hclosure .n_~. ~ ~~ ~ o ~.r~~-h ,-~~
'{~ Gc.a. ~ e~ ~ .
~ ~=~
P . ~ . ~~ .~s~ ~Jn-~
Cn~li2tt~ of ~A~riA~F
I ~.
PO. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 2 4018-07 9 8 (703) 772-2023
., „.
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSID
BOND FINANCING BY THE COUrTI'Y OF ROANOKE, VIRGII~TIA
Notice is hereby given that the Board of County Supervisors of the County
of Roanoke; Virginia (the "County") will hold a public hearing in accordance
with Sections 15.1-171.1 and 15.1-504, Code of Virginia 1950, as amended, on
the issuance of not to exceed $470,000.00 general obligation equipment
financing bonds tthe "Bonds") of the County to finance the purchase of
equipment for school purposes. An ordinance authorizing the issuance of the
Bonds will be considered by the Board of County Supervisors at its meeting on
May 23, 1989. A copy of such resolution is on file in the office of the
County Administrator in the County of Roanoke, Virginia.
The public hearing, which may be continued or adjourned, will be held at
7:00 o'clock p.m. on May 23, 1989 before the Board of County Supervisors, in
the Board of County Supervisors Meeting Room, at the Roanoke County
Administration Center, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, in Roanoke, Virginia.
Publish on the Following Dates:
May 8, 1989
May 15, 1989
Morning and Evening Editions
Bill Cost of Publication:
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
P. 0. Box 29800
Roanoke, Virginia 24018-0798
O~ ROANp~.~
.~
Z
~ 2
J a
18 ~.'~°~' 88
SFSQUICENTENN~P~
A Bcau~iful Beginning
C~nixn~~ of ~n~n~ke
DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES
M E M O R A N D U M
T0:
FROM:
DATE:
Arnold Covey
Director of Development and Inspections
D. K. Cook ~~~
Director of Human Resources
March 23, 1989
SUBJECT: Retirement Application - James M. St. Clair
An employee in your department, James M. St. Clair, has applied for
service retirement effective May 1, 1989. According to our records, Mr.
St. Clair will have more than 12 years of service with the county when
he retires.
The Board of Supervisors recognizes all employees who retire with
credible service with the county by adopting a resolution of
appreciation and presenting it to the retiring employee at a regular
board session.
Please complete the information on the draft resolution attached and
return it to Mary Allen in the County Administrator's office as soon as
possible. Any other information that you believe reflects the accom-
plishments or awards received by this employee should also be provided.
Thank you for your assistance in this matter.. Please contact the Depart-
ment of Human Resources if you have any questions.
kkv
Attachment
c: Elmer C. Hodge
Mary Allen
COMMITTEE VACANCIES IN 1989
JANUARY
Court Service Unit Advisory Council/Youth and Family
Services Advisory Board
Two year term of Hoyt C. Rath, Vinton District, will
expire 1/26/89.
FT.'.RRTT~RV
Electoral Board - Appointed by the Courts
Three year term of Mrs. May Johnson will expire
2/28/89.
MARCH
Court Service Unit Advisory Council/Youth and Family
Services Advisory Board
Two year terms of James L. Trout, Cave Spring District,
Red R. Powell, Cave Spring District, and James K.
Sanders, Windsor Hills District, will expire 3/22/89.
League of Older Americans
One year term of Webb Johnson, County Representative,
will expire 3/31/89.
JUNE
Board of Zoning Appeals - Appointed by Judge of Circuit
Court
Five Year term of Neil W. Owen will expire 6/30/89.
Fifth Planninq District Commission
Three year terms of Richard W. Robers, Fred Anderson
and John Hubbard, Citizen Representative and Executive
Committee will expire 6/30/89.
Parks & Recreation Advisory Commission
Three year terms of Vince Joyce, Cave Spring District,
Alice Gillespie, Hollins District, and Thomas
Robertson, Vinton District, will expire 6/30/89.
C P. DTL'MB LSD
Court Service Unit Advisory Council/Youth and Family
Services Advisory Board
Youth Members from Cave Spring, William Byrd, Glenvar
High and Northside High Schools to be appointed.
Industrial Development Authority
Four year terms of Billy H. Branch, Cave Spring
District, and W. Darnall Vinyard, Vinton District will
expire 9/26/89.
Grievance Panel
Two year term of Kim Owens will expire 9/27/89.
rcnc ~ u urtn LSD
Health Department Board of Directors
Two year term of Susan Adcock will expires 11/26/89.
n tin ~*rtn LSD
Library Board
Four year term of Richard Kirkwood, Hollins District,
will expire 12/21/89. Mr. Kirkwood resigned 12/88.
Mental Health Services of the Roanoke Valley, Community
Services Board
Three year term of Sue Ivey, County appointee, will
expire 12/31/89.
Roanoke County Planning Commission
Four year term of Wayland Winstead, Catawba District,
will expire 12/31/89.
Regional Partnership Site Advisory Committee
Three year term of Charles Saul will expire 12/21/89.
2
~
~' -
BETTER BEGINNINGS ~,~,z. H~ ~~_
~ ~.~,
,
, ~
An Advocate for Children, A Catalyst for Change
i_
~
~ ~
_, ~~.
Partrctp~nng orgaruranoM { ~ ; c~ ~ L' c. ~ ~~~., r~ Y
April 5, 1989
~c V t. ~~
American Red Cross
Association for Retarded Citizens
Catholic Charities of Southwestern
Virgins
Child Abuw and Neglect Coordinating
c°"""f Dear Colleague:
council of Contmuruty Service.
City of Salem school.
Easter seal society of Virginia . inst. In response to the Children Who Ha_v_e_ Children
lBM Corporation report release in the Fall of 1988, describing the
Jobs for virgittia cradustes, Inc.
Junior Leagw of Roartoks, inst. devastating economic, educational and health-related
r~farch of Dime impact of adolescent pregnancy on the Roanoke
t~,t~ th Services of the Roanoke Valley, the Better Beginnings Coalition has organized
Planned Parenthood of Southwest a one-day:
Virgtrtia. Inc.
Roanoke Area M'vuatries
Roanoke City Departrttent of Social STRATEGIC PLANNING SESSION ON ADOLESCENT
~^^~~ PREGNANCY -
Roanoke City Health Department
Prevention and Intervention
Roanoke City office on Youth
Roatwke city schools On May 25, 1989
Roanoke County/Salem Health Moody Center, Hollins College
Departments
Roanoke County Schools
Roanoke fHerrtorial Hospital of~/crn This planning session will be conducted by a
cl°'~` l"`'
Total Action Against Pbwrty/Project rofessional consultant from Milwaukee, Wisconsin,
p
~~+ Gary Hollander, and is being financed through the
TRUST help of several Roanoke Valley jurisdictions. The
Virginia Cooperative Extermiat
seruKe/a-H
anticipated outcome on May 25th is a community-
wide strategic plan for a comprehensive, coordinated,
cost-effective approach to preventing and coping
with the problems of adolescent pregnancy. To
achieve this goal we will need to have in
attendance leaders representing each agency and
organization that works with youth-at-risk Por
adolescent pregnancy.
The Better Beginnings Coalition, therefore, urges you
to put May 25 (approximately 9:00 a.m. - 4:00 p.m.)
on your calendar TODAY! Registration materials mill
be forthcoming.
Sincerely yours,
Winnie Krasnow
Chair, Better Beginnings
~, S . Z~ ~~ CL1.N.f t Of ~"SOYI ~ A~-Y1 GC.~ ~.GQ,9.C- 'F~'Lr '~0 ~-!~i G~.. 0.,
Pmud W Rorwl~ Cav O(fw an Youth
~O
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
ZANE M. JONES, Chairman
Simmonsville Magisterial District
JOHN M. LEE, Vice-Chairman
Alleghany Magisterial District
VIRGINIA S. CALDWELL, Member
New Castle Magisterial District
04 CRAIG
°~ uy G
~ ~
!~ ~
Z v ~
~oJ°~,.. a~~.,
'1851.
NEW CASTLE, VIRGINIA 24127
April 19, 1989
Mr. Elmer C. Hodge
Roanoke Countv Administrator
P. 0. Box 29800
Roanoke, VA 24018-0798
Dear Mr. Hodge:
Jeffrey D. Johnson
County Administrator
P. O. Box 308
New Castle, Va. 24127
Telephone (703 864-5010
I am writing you regarding Craig County's request for
membership in the Mental Health Services of Roanoke Valley.
The Board of Directors of Mental Health Services of-the Roanoke
Valley have agreed to begin the process of adding Craig-County
to the list of member jurisdictions.
In order to become a member, Craig County adopted the
enclosed resolution oti the 18th day of April, 1989. It will be
necessary for member jurisdictions to resolve Craig County
becoming a participating jurisdiction in Mental Health Services
of the Roanoke Valley Community Services Board. I have enclosed
a proposed resolution for your review and presentation to your
governing body.
We are looking forward to working with the current member
jurisdictions. Please call me if you have any questions.
JDJ/bfs ~ ~~'
t1 N T Y O F C ,R
AIG
Sincerely,
/~/,~
/~~;~ .
Jeffrey D. Johnson
County Administrator
Enclosures
PROPOSED COUf~1TY 0F' ROANOKE
L"Of1~1UNT I Y SERVICES BOARD RESOLUTION
At a regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors of the
County of Roanoke ,Virginia, held at Clocation) on Cdate) ,
---------- -------
there were present: C1ist of Supervisors)
A RESOLUTION:
To Establish Craig County as a member of f~lental Health Services
of the Roanoke Valley.
On a motion by ____________ seconded by ____
passed by a unanimous vote, the Board of Supervisors
County of Roanoke, adopted the following resolution:
of the
and
WHEREAS, Chapter 10 of Title 37.1 of the Code of Virginia
x:1950), as amended, provides for the establishment of a community
services board to deliver mental health, mental retardation, and
substance abuse services; and
WHEREAS, the Cities of Roanoke and Salem and the Counties of
Botetourt and Roanoke, with the intent of implementing provisions
of Chapter "10 of Title 37.1 of the Code of Virginia, have joined
together to establish f'1ental Health Services of the Roanoke
Valley; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Craig County, Virginia,
has, in its meeting on Cdate), passed a resolution requesting
membership in and representation on the Board of Directors of
f1ental Health Services of the Roanoke Valley; now
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of
the County of Roanoke, in conjunction with the Councils of the
Cities of Roanoke and Salem and the Board of Supervisors of the
County of Botetourt, approves the request of Craig County for
membership in f1ental Health Services of the Roanoke Valley; and
FURTHER, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Directors of
~1ental Health Services of the Roanoke Valley is instructed by the
member jurisdictions to present for their ratification amended
By-Laws, increasing the membership of the Board from fifteen to
sixteen, with the additional member to be appointed by the Board
of Supervisors of Craig County.
A COPY, TESTE
County Administrator, County of Roanoke
Mr. Hodge:
The Roanoke Valley Preservation Foundation has requested time on
the May 9th agenda to ggive a few comments on National Hisatoric
Preservation week and reservation in the Roanoke Valley. Deedie
Kagey will be one of the speakers.
They also sent a proclamation to be presented at that time.
_--~
Is that 0. K.? ~ 1
Mary Allen ;` ~~ % i ~~
4/24/89 ~~ -~
Q~° ~ m`
3vf~ ~ ,
~ ~ ~~
5~c~
o~-~
'ROANOKE VALLEY PRESERVATION FOUNDATION
P. O. BOX 1558
ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24007
t~T~-:~art~m~Et.ta, 41ir`gii"+1.c:1 ~:fF+_}~.~
I'~dati~~:~r-tal F-li~t~~~r"i~" ~'r~r'~ar•vat.E,_,r-+ 4•J~ek. will. be (~~7.(=br"~~t~~! ~cr"~~~~~:~ tl-}~
ir+a~: 1~~~r+ I~{Ic~V .I.~-!'..._~(_1. I I'1t~. ~~r~:'art~:~I{(? ~1:-_111F3:j/ 1:-~r"E:?=it~r^~Jc.~t 1~~~Y'I ~~~~i_trt~~t 1~=arty
t h~ Rt~q i. ~~~irta l 1=~r"~s~r"'vat i ~~~r-t Cent tar" ai~td l ~~~~: a l h i st ~ ~r" i ca l s~~~c i Et i e
a }'" r•? 1 t:=~,W, I~ ]. r"t C~ ~" ,~~ }: • S4 ~ r" Cj t ~ =~ t h ~:~ '1= F~ c~ t J. 'J 1 t ]. E? : 1 }"t ~~~ +_t r' C,F, fll fil +_(rt 1 t }~' .
I° I~ r" r--~ i r-t l~ i t ~~ i i-+ i s wr_-~ ~:~'r'• ~ i:~ a r" t i ~~: +_( :I.:~ r" l y 't h a rt l~. f +_( 1. a rt t~ ~:~ p t i rn i. t i c t h i
year` in 1 iyht ~~~f the= r"~3~'•~rrt pa~s~ayF~ ~w~f sir.Irti'Ficartt pr"maser"~.i.at a.~r~r+
7.egis7.ati~:~~rt in the C~erter"al f-~~~prrib7.t~. ~Jp qtr^r~ ~ti~~uc•i;~~lly ~l~(~ ~1:~_;
I"1 i.~ 4' ~ ~'r +.l (.3 (.? ~.~, r" t ~' 'r" ~~~ f+l ."-a ~ _~... i , t_t r' .I. ,w, (^ a 1 1 ii? Ca 1 ~> .~ a t ~=~'r" z.~ . t'~ ]. r" 1:7 1 r1 1 rat •~ }"t C'I t 17 ~
fe~~~<:art~~.~l~e Valley ~'~i"tt7.C.~i~Jate c':1rt lr"IC'r'ec'aS~fi ~wMr"~YtP55 ~~~f aricl
r~ ~ l:? i'" C:3 L" .l a t 1 ~ ~'~ rl 1" ~~~ }'" ~ ~~ +_(r" I"} 1 5a t ~;~ r" :L C r" F? a,:=, +_l Y" C:: f? S .
.~ c'~ rt I w r^ 1 '(; 7. rt ~ t ~::? r^~-' ~ +_(e =.~ t t ~~~ ~=1 G7 ~ ~ a r'` ~"} r+ ~ ~~:~ c"1 rl ~ =~ I{ e I~ ~`~ +..(rt t !! ~ ~=~ t:~ r" (~ ~=~'F
+_(~aerwis~T~r"ray ctgertda f,~~r" thc~ May ray 1`?~~"~ meetirty Mat ,.:;cCiii pr+l.
h-I i ~ t ,M, r" i ~? in y M r-..:~ . D (_ ~~ ~ i ~ i~~ a rI F~ ~ a rt ~ D r• . *I ~~~ h n tr ~.~ r rt y L•7 a. r" ~ ~: t ,M, r" , ~'~ f ~: h ~~
~' :I. \~ 7. ?~ 1 ~~~ rt ! :~ 1- NI :1. s=, 1:, ! ~ r' 7. r, I_ a rt t~ rtl {~t'r" 4 ~ ~ f' I:a :L ~~~ i"+ a 1 ~~ r" e"-.•: [:''r' V a i;, 1 ~~~ Y+ ~_. F?'r't t C--.' r' 4^J :L 1 .).
•-~~.: c ~T~ rtl ~.~ a rt ti~ rtl ~'~ . 4~1e v~a~::~ t_(l ci l.:i. Fr.Gu t ~~, to d c1 r^ ~ ~ ~ the ~•~~,~a r" ~I w i. t h a ~= ew
C`~~~rilrt7ert'~' c' ~~?}"t rtilat 1 ~w,'t"ta 1 I-I'1 cat ~~~r" 1. [~ i-'r'M'~=r E'sr"\~fa t 1 ~~~rt t~C3G?li. c3 i'1(~ fi7r^E.'.~,C:?r"S•';_~i:..l ~~~rt
1 r+ ~=~+_t Y" C~":~ftlftl+_tY't 1'r V.
"I 1 ra t i ~~ }'" 1 C (-~ r" e t E? r" `J °:l t 1 ~ =~ }''I
g~~~ve_~r"rtnlertt ~'.
'Thartl{ y~~~+_( f~~~r" yc~+_(r" ~:att~
i'~ e a r" i ir+ r._i f r",:~, r,l ~.,M, t_(. I 'r
~ ~•~ r'-
r•
171a.rt ha I=.. B~_~?< l~E~y,
E rt c: l ~~~ ~ +_t r° ~~
haves 1 r"IC 1 +_ICI~C.~ 1:~ ~Jr'`~~~C 1 c~ftlat :L ~:~r"t '~~~~r' I~Irlt 1 ~=~r'tcl 1
~,.I e e I'~. < l~ ~ w• ; +_(1 c~ 1. i k ~ t ,w, a rt r+~~~ +_(rt c e t h
C,T,+..i'r'tty al~_~rtg wa.th the ,~:,t:t~er" tlalle~-
~l"+'C1.~~'~i't t!~~ tl"}~?5.:>~ fllat'~:er"~. ~ 1~~,~T~~, f~:;i'"4+lar"(~ tG
yi~~i_! vh~~~i_+.1t1 YI~'C_a(:j ~:,,w, '~uG?1(Y'F]I"IC!ir+e r11~y r+l`~! r"t+_(r11i:]E?r"
ROANOKE VALLEY PRESERVATION FOUNDATION
P. O. BOX 1558
ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24007
WI-IERE:~dS w F-I i ~~'G ~:~r"' i c pr"1=~'~~r~vr~'G x ~:~rt y i v~ ~ ~~(ner" :i. c~rt~ a c~~~~p~r"
t_i rtd rva ~:, <~ {; arty i rt y ~ ~~ fi is Fr ~~ i. r" r" i. ~:::'t'~ 1 y ~1:. v~ r" ~ ~ ~~ r"r_ h i +' E~ ~ t' t_~ ~~ • •~ 3. ~:~ r'tc1 t~ t..~ 7. ~1 t_{,p" ~a. 1.
L,~hiE~ 1n'E::p~ e F-I i. ~t ~::~r i c:~ pr"c~~~~r"~'~t i ~~~r-t r~~~rtt r" i 1:,+_rt ~s ~~ ~w~ t h~.~ a. i ~~.~.t~ i '1 ~. t ~~
~" f: ~ 6N r'1 c~ a C i i_ i C-~ ::a ~ Yl {~ 'P"tip : ,=t 1 rYa Y"'r? cl ".•~ cl rl Cj ~:} 1'" i i (il ~~~ ~ ii=' ~.i .~ ~~~ Cm c~ 1
G:~ r" i c~ E_~ ~ r-t ~~ c ~~ ~ rtl nl {_i r°t i 'l: t,, :~ r~ .l 1" .-_ 17 ~ :l Fa ;;
r' ~ t') ]. ~a ~; i =~ r"' 1 C ~:11_t 1 .(. t_;I 1 r`I C:~ S „ 5~ :I. '~ E f5 ctrl CI E.i't; r'' t_l C'G !_1 r" t~ ~ ~ S W E' ~. ~. ra r
pr"E'.tl .l5'1; i;~r" 1 C~ a 1 t' ~~~s clr'i-:'. 1 f11G1~=~p'~; i~rt~: rt= =z~w~t_t.ri:=E' y ~: ~=~ ~=~t_tr" C~:~~filfl'It_trl 1 ~ p' n
Wh'IEF~C-~RS ~ nl~t i~ ~r-t~l t~ii5'~~r~r"itT F'r"E}~~r"v~rt i~~~r-t Week. 198` pr~~~vit~e~
r=r Y7 e X t:~ !`:' .~ ~. i= ri •h' ~~~ p (.7 ~~;~ p^'~ t l't"t i '~" 41 ~' ~ -'r" t~ 1. 1. ~ ftl e r" i t~ c"r rt 5 '~ i~,~ I"1 C' Z p (11 c~ ]. rt t c"# :I. rt g
~5p^F?c~E:?r"ve <'~1"1 i.1 pl''~W~t ec:'N` i_~I.Ar" rt?~: ]. ~J1"{" ~^ ('lC?r" i t ell~L-a °y
~ i c ~' I"1 e '~ I'l ~ f11 e '~ i~r r" I-'I 1 :.~'~: ~=~ r" 1 tY
~ ~ ;-' • ~' ~ " I--,~~ ~ ~i ~i, 1"I ~~~ (Il ~' 64 ~ r'' CI g ri 1"Il ~? r" 1 C c`:l 1 ..a
Wl-i~.Rl.~.!-~.'.? n
1~~'r"~~ti~r"~,~~.}.t i~;-~r, ~fF.~~k. 1.``~~"fig c~-~:;p~~~rt~~~~r~c~ by t~ta~~ t~l~rt i.~~~rt~1 Tr"t_i ~~t f'r-~i:,
t-I :I. `~i'~ ? :~'r" 1 C'. I•=''r ' f:_a s e'r" ~' <l'l::L ~M~'trt ~ r1 C~ ~ I"l F_.~ l +~~ i~ :~l ]. p r'• ~= W: e Y" `d .-'•~ ~r ]. ~~~ r"1 i?. rl l"~ rI E:~ :L C.I tI t71~~ r't'} ~ =~ ~_~ [~
~:"~ r" (.~ ca r-t i ~~ ~ 1 ~~} rl iii i rl ~; t'1 [? Fi ~ ~~ c1 r"I ~T~ I~. k? ~'~ ~. 1 ~ ~it "y
lu i i 4y M t: t'1 E? r" e ~(" ~~ ~ p" ~ g ~ „ ~ ~. (Ii C-_'r..' ~ e I'~ ~~ ~ CI f~ ~ g ~ t„I fil 1 1"1 1 ~'~~ r' ~ ~ ~=~ r" ,-, ~(' } ~ ~'
[,;~~itt,l''I't;~l i~~j" ~?~~~car°t~~~l•~.E'q \,~l.r`"C31rt:Lcag ~~w~ t14=`Y"ktiY pr"~W~C~.rllft7 I~'Icr~/ 1.'~F°'i.Wi:Jy ~.~~~~q
c~ c~
t~IFiT I C~I~iF1L i-~f I a"I"L1 Fe T. C; 1^'FdE~'r::iE.:fdVfa'I"T. C~IrI WE:E_I'.
]. r't ~' 17 e ~~=~ t_! rt ~ y ~~~ f ~ i ~ .l". ~~~ ~. E? ca rl C~ C ~ 1 Z i_t ~:J iwi rl ~=~ t_I r'' C:.l ~.; 7. ":"_ e rt C3 ~ ~:? y." ~? G:. ~wi ~ rt 1 ~ e
~rtt:i p<-:rr"i; i r_• i pat e i rt t; l-r i ~ = peg: i. ~a :l ~- b ,er"v ~rtre„
rticipatiny Organisati«+.
xriun Red Cro.s
sociation itx Retarded Crtiztns
~thobc Charities of sout}w~,estern
Vvgrtia
u~p~ and ~Y Coordir'ata+9
x,t,d of Ctxnmuruty Services
~y of Sa{etn Schook
cater Seal society d Vugnia . ln~
~M Corporation
>bs for Virgnia Graduates, tr-e
uror Lesyue of Roanoke, h+e
~d~
kntal Health Servico ei the Re.rwke
vat
fanned Parenthood of southwest
Virsynia. Lrc.
loanokc Ares Mcristries
~„~Cr~iga.aepata„ent of social
toanok~th pepartment
;oanoke City Office on Youth
~o~ke city srhoo~
Roarake County/Sdetn health
Departure^ta
Roanoke County
Roanoke frferrarial liosoital OB/GYN
clinic Inc.
Total Action Agnir-st Povertv/Pt'~
~t~
TRUST
Vu~inia CoopHeratr+e Fxtet+sion
ff~~ti~3~A151611~
lti . o"
^'~ ~~ ~•
[V\J V N
S~
~? (~c~ F
BETTER BEGINNINGS
An Advocate for Children, A Catalyst for Change
February 24, 1989
Randy Smith, City Manager U~
City of Salem ~~;,._,s",
P. D. BOJC 869 ,; ~.,'. ,, y~ . ~~ l r
Salem, VA 24153-0869
Dear Mr. Smith:
G~~
J j.
~"
:J-
-~c~CE;V ~^
. `~
~ ~,~ ~~\
In the fall of 1988 an Adolescent Pregnancy Task
Force in Roanoke released s study, Children Who
Have Children, Which described the economic,
educational, and health-related impact of adolescent
pregnancy on our ,vouch and on our community at
large. Statistics from the Virginia Departm nano f ' "~'~ ,
Health (as of June 8, 1988) indicate thaz~l~ ke_s- /"~~>: %~-~ ~--
pregnancy rate for girls 14 and younger is more ~: ~~
than twice the state average for the second year in ;
a row.
The Better Beginnings Coalition of the Roanoke
Valley is an eduroximately 25 aresaservice p
comprised of app
organizations. It Was identified by the Adolescent
Pregnancy Task Force as the moat appropriate
vehicle for communication and coordination among
the agencies addressing the problem of adolescent
pregnancy. The mission of our coalition is to
prevent adolescent pregnancy in the Roanoke Valley
and to promote a better outcome for young Women
Who do become pregnant.
In order to develop s comprehensive plan in
response to Lhe problems identified in Children Who
Have Children the Better Beginnings Coalition hss
decided to organize none-day strategic planning
session for area agencies and orgsrizatiors to be
conducted by 8 professional consultant on May 25,
1989 at Hollins College. The anticipated outcome
Would be a plan of action for mobilizing valley-Wide
the current relevant programs to achieve a
comprehensive and coordinated approach Lob hWell as
problems of ,youths-at-risk for pregnancy,
to the problems of ,youths Who have become
pregnant.
The Better Beginnings Coalition currently has no
funds and so is requesting from four Roanoke Valley
jurisdictions (BotetourL County, Roanoke County,
Salem, and Lhe City of Roanoke) the amount of 5500
each, Which Would cover Lhe costs of the strategic
planning session (see below).
STRATEGIC PLANNING SESSION BUDGET
Consultant's Fee 51000.00
Consultant's Travel Expenses 600.00
Hollins College Facility/
Equipment Rentals 100.00
Printing Expenses 250.00
Mailing Expenses ._.....50.00
Total Expenses
52000.00
The consultant under consideration is Gary Hollander
(see attached resume), mho is in private practice in
Milw2ukee; Wisconsin, specializing in strategic
planning and organizational design for sexuality-
related issues. He would be available for pre-
session planning on May 24th and for the conference
on the 25th. It is expected that approximately 30
service organizations mould participate in the
conference.
We urge ,vou to consider the seriousness of the
problem of adolescent pregnancy and its devastating
socioeconomic impact on the Roanoke Valley.
Community-wide strategic planning mill provide the
necessary initiative for developing a comprehensive,
coordinated, cost-effective approach to this problem
and its prevention.
Please respond to this request for the vitally-
needed 5500 by writing to the Better Beginnings
Coalition, P. D. Box 11991, Roanoke, VA, 24022, or
by calling Cheri Hartman, Strategic Planning
Subcommittee, at 985-0151, no later than Friday,
March 10th.
Sincerer yours,
7~h%~ S 7w~,.J
Winnie Kras
Chairman
Better Beginnings Coalition
Garv Hollander
1742 Vii'. Prospect ,venue
Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53202
Home: (414) 239-0779
Work: (414) 351-57ti0
PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE
1986 - GARY HOLLANDER ENTERPRISES
present AS OCtATED WOMEN'S PSYC OTHERAPY
Consultant and Psychotherapist
• Consult with processionals in strategic planning and organizational design in
AIDS and sexuality related issues
• Provide various forms of therapeutic intervention including individual
assessessment, therapy. group, and family
• Develop and deliver programs for adult children of alcoholics, persons in
recovery from addictions, and those diagnosed as having AIDS
• Write manuals and plans for staff and organizational development
• Deliver motivational speeches on topics of mental health and positive change
. PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF WISCONSIN, INC.
~ggg _
,
1986 Director of Training and Education
• Managed training and education department for nation's largest tamily planning
agency
• Developed agency policy and procedures for community education and
advocacy on various educational issues
~ggp _ MILWAUKEE PUBLIC SCHOOLS
~gg~ School Psychologist
• Provided assessment services to professional staff utilizing psychometric
f academic achievement, and
t
s o
measures including intelligence tests. tes
various psycho-social measures for children and families
• Provided group and individual therapy
• Developed individual educational plans for students with specific needs
i979_ MILWAUKEE PUBLIC SCHOOLSICURATIVE REHABILITATION
~ggp Practicum Experience
• Provided assessment services in the Demmer/KiwaAis Center for Child
and in various public
Development. the Adult Rehabilitation Counseling area.
elementary and secondary schools
ment services to physically disabled
• Counseled and provided case manage
adults
1970 - MILWAUKEE PUBLIC SCHOOLS
1979 Classroom Teacher
• Provided daily classroom instruction for adolescents in English and
communications.
• Developed programs for students experiencing school failure and to decrease
recidivism •
EDUCATIONAL EXPERIENCE
gS 1970 University of Wisconsin -Milwaukee English Education
MS 1979 University of Wisconsin - MiNvaukee Educational Psychology
license 1980 University of Wisconsin -- MiMvaukee School Psychology
Fellow 1987 University of Wisconsin -- Milwaukee School Psychology
REPRESENTATIVE PROGRAMS PRESENTED
January, 1989
December, 1988
November, t 988
November, 1988
October, 1988
Conwltation Strategies
UWM Course in educational psychology for school psychologists and counselors
Psychosexual Development in At-Risk Youth
Planned Parenthood of Connecticut
AIDS Education in the Context of Sexuality Education
Presentation to AIDS Coalition in Ames, Iowa
Revitalizing a Sexuality Education Campaign
Regional conference in New York for Planned Parenthood Federation
volunteer Program Management
Skill building coherence for National AIDS Network in New Orleans
October, 1988 Teens, Risk Behaviors, and AIDS
Program development project !or adolescent sex offenders through Milwaukee
` AIDS Project and Milwaukee County Health Department funded by State of
'i Wisconsin
~,
September, 1988 Roles and issues in School Psychology
' UWM course in educational psychology for school psychologists ,
August, 1988 Taking the Lead: Cooperative Strategies in Sexuality Education
National conference on policies and practices of sexuality education
June. 1988 Evaluation of Education and Communication in Residential Treatment
Research project for a Wisconsin residential treatment center for boys
May, 1988 Strategies in Sexuality Education
Presernation to an Ohio coalition on passing sexuality education initiatives
March, 1988 Volunteer Management in AIDS Organizations
Research and development project for the Milwaukee AIDS Project and General
Electric
November, 1987 Sexuality Education Workshop
Presernation to National Public Affairs staff of Planned Parenthood Federation
November, 1987 Prevention Worksl
Presentation to Positive Youth Development and Wisconsin Prevention Network
September, 1987 Principles of Classroom Appraisal and Evaluation
UWM course in educational psychology for prospective teachers
September. 1987 Operational Planning
Retreat and workshop series for a residential treatment center
June, 1987 Phase Il Recovery
Intensive Weekend for adults in recovery programs
May, t987 Building Community Coalitions
Workshop for family planning agencies on gathering community support
March, 1987 The Wisconsin Experience
Presentation in Austin, Texas on sexuality education
' pebruary, '987 Fundamentals of Sexuality Education
presernation in Portland. Oregon on sexuality education
March. 1986 Life Options Approach to Prevention
Comrrwnity coalition building workshop
December, 1985 Adolescent Pregnancy Prevention
Workshop for human service providers
April. t 985 Human Sexuality Training
Two-day intensive for devebpmentaly disabled
January, 1985 Values in Sexuality Education
Workshop for Wisconsin Division of Corrections Psychologists
August, 1984 Workshop f ~ Mi Waukee Pubt c S pools .
March, 1984 Sexuality av~~sco srn School Psychologist Convention
Workshop
PUBI_1CATIONS AND PAPERS ~.
Hollander, G. W. (1988)• Volunteer management: Developmenf and maintenance of volunteer
programs in AIDS service organizations. Washington, D.C.: National AIDS Network.
Hollander, G. W 0987)• The Wisconsin experience. Emphasis. New York: Planned Parenthood
Federation of America, Inc.
Hollander, G. W. (198• The effects of cognitive behavioral therapies on the adaptive behaviors of
adolescents. Unpublished doctoral paper.
roach to adolescent pregnancy Prevention. Review. New
Hollander, G. W. (1986). A life options aPP
York: Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc•
COMMITTEE VACANCIES IN 1989
JANUARY
Court~Service Unit Advisory Council/Youth and Family
Services Advisory Board
Two year term of Hoyt C. Rath, Vinton District, will
expire 1/26/89.
FFRRTT DR V
Electoral Board - Appointed by the Courts
Three year term of Mrs. May Johnson will expire
2/28/89.
MARCH
Court Service Unit Advisory Council/Youth and Family
Services Advisory Board
Two year terms of James L. Trout, Cave Spring District,
Red R. Powell, Cave Spring District, and James K.
Sanders, Windsor Hills District, will expire 3/22/89.
League of Older Americans
One year term of Webb Johnson, County Representative,
will expire 3/31/89.
JUNE
~~ Board of Zoning Appeals - ~
Court
Five Year term of Neil W. Owen will expire 6/30/89.
Fifth Planning District Commission
Three year terms of Richard W. Robers, Fred Anderson
and John Hubbard, Citizen Representative and Executive
Committee will expire 6/30/89.
Parks & Recreation Advisory Commission
Three year terms of Vince Joyce, Cave Spring District,
Alice Gillespie, Hollins District, and Thomas
Robertson, Vinton District, will expire 6/30/89.
SEPTEMBER
Court Service Unit Adviso
Services Advisory Board
Council/Youth and Famil
Youth Members from Cave Spring, William Byrd, Glenvar
High and Northside High Schools to be appointed.
Industrial Development Authority
Four year terms of Billy H. Branch, Cave Spring
District, and W. Darnall Vinyard, Vinton District will
expire 9/26/89.
Grievance Panel
Two year term of Kim Owens will expire 9/27/89.
nin~~z~wta ~o
Health De artment Board of Directors
Two year term of Susan Adcock will expires 11/26/89.
n L+n z~ia a coo
Library Board
Four year term of Richard Kirkwood, Hollins District,
will expire 12/21/89. Mr. Kirkwood resigned 12/88.
Mental Health Services of the Roanoke Valley, Community
Services Board
Three year term of Sue Ivey, County appointee, will
expire 12/31/89.
Roanoke County Planning Commission
Four year term of Wayland Winstead, Catawba District,
will expire 12/31/89.
Regional Partnership Site Advisory Committee
Three year term of Charles Saul will expire 12/21/89.
2
O~ POAN ~.~
ti 9
Z
z
J a
18 ~~ 88
SFSQUICENTENN~P~
A Beauti ful8eginning
C~nixn~~ of ~nttnuke
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
ELMER C. HODGE April 12, 1989
Ms. Ann E. Weaver
Executive Director
Clean Valley Council
P. 0. Box 3320
Roanoke, Va. 24015
Dear Ms. Weaver:
LEE GARRETT. CHAIRMAN
WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
RICHARD W. ROBERS. VICE-CHAIRMAN
CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
BOB L. JOHNSON
HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
STEVEN A. MCGRAW
CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
HARRY C. NICKENS
VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
I have discussed with Mr. Robers the possibility of his
continuing to serve on the Clean Valley Council in an inactive
capacity so that the Board of Supervisors may continue to be
informed of your activities. He is agreeable to serving another
term as a representative of the Roanoke County Board of
Supervisors.
I also discussed with him your suggestion that the Board of
Supervisors appoint another county resident to serve as an active
member representing Roanoke County. He agreed to that suggestion
also.
Therefore, on the May agenda for the Board of Supervisors, I will
request that the Board of Supervisors appoint Mr. Robers to serve
another term as an inactive member of the Clean Valley Council
and will request that the Board appoint another Roanoke County
resident to serve as an active member. Both terms will begin
July 1, 1989. I will contact you when these appointments are
made.
Sincerely,
Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
CC: Supervisor Richard Robers
P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 2 4018-07 9 8 (703) 772-2004
,J~'~ ~
March 29, 1989
Mr. Elmer C. Hodge
Administrator, Roanoke County
P. 0. Box 29800
Roanoke, Virginia 24018
Dear Elmer:
As you know, we have representation on our Board of Directors
from the five localities wears and hasvjusBobeen electedet ed
on our Board for several y Jul 1, 1989.
serve as president of the organization beginning y
For several years a member of the Board of Suphe iAlan Britbtlen
designated as a member -- first Bob Johnson,
and, most recently, Richard Robers. Although Richard has been
very interested in our work, he has not been able to attend any
of our meetings duringthhet~ett edevote to Clean ValleydCouncil.
he just does not have
ortant to us to have as much input as possible
Since it is imp
from the localities, do you have another recommendation for
county representation? Our regular meeting time is at noon on
the 4th Tuesday ofrdaof Su ervisorssfindattdifficultntohattend
members of the Boa P
our meetings.
We would appreciate yourdationg this your consideration and look
forward to your recommen
Sincerely,
C ~~
Ann E. Weaver
Executive Director
P.O. Box 3320, Roanoke Valley, Virginia 24015-1320 Phone (703) 345-5523
Clean Valley Council
o~` ROANp,~~
~ A i
ti 9
Z
z
~ .. a
18 x151 $$
P~'
SFSQUICENTENN~
.1 Btauri~ull3e~;irmi~t~;
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
ELMER C HODGE
Ms. Ann E. Weaver
Executive Director
Clean Valley Council
p, p. Box 3320
Roanoke, Va. 24015
Dear Ms. Weaver:
April 12, 1989
LEE GARRETT. CHAIRMAN
'.Y i~'vU SUSd I AIL L`. ,.~...,~~ ~ ~Ria~ DiST :~~.
RICHARD W- ROBERS. VICE CHAIRMAN
C. F~VL tiF'~F21NG MA(~ISTE AIA~ DIS TR~C'
BOB L JOHNSON
1~(Jl l.INS MAC;ISTE R:AL DI~TRi/.'
STEVEN A. MCGRAW
(.A7AWf3A MaGiSTE pia- DIST RAC`
HARRY C. NICKENS
VI ~i TC)M1 MAGIS?F aIF~ DI ~T4i~:`
I have discussed with Mr. Robers the possibility of his
continuing to serve on the Clean Valley Council in an inactive
capacity so that the Board of Supervisors may continue to be
informed of your activities. He is agreeable to serving another
term as a representative of the Roanoke County Board of
Supervisors.
I also discussed with him your suggestion that the Board of
Supervisors appoint another county resident to serve as an active
member representing Roanoke County. He agreed to that suggestion
also.
Therefore, on the May agenda for the Board of Supervisors, I will
request that the Board of Supervisors appoint Mr. Robers to serve
another term as an inactive member of the Clean Valley Council
and will request that the Board appoint another Roanoke County
resident to serve as an active member. Both terms will begin
July 1, 1989. I will contact you when these appointments are
made.
Sincerely,
/ J '~,
Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
CC: Supervisor Richard Robers
(~L1Ltri~~ A~ ~.~uMnII~2P
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
f'<> F3c>X 2531300 f2<>AN~>KE_. Vlf~cINiA :'401£3 075)E3 (70.3) 7-72 2004
AT A REGULAR MEETIHELDFATHTHEOROANOKESCOUNTYSADMINISTRATOION
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, Ih ~~,~~ (Board Meeting date).
CENTER ON ~~; ~~'~~
~,J~,,~ 4 RESOLUTION EXPRESSING THE
f^/ APPRECIATION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
OF ROANOKE COUNTY TO
FOR YEARS OF SERVICES TO ROANOKE COUNTY.
~ ~ /J ~ ~~ ~~ , ~YJ~,Es'~ ( NAME ) w a s f i r s t
WHEREAS, ~ l7
~~ l~ (DATE) of ~ ~~ (YEAR) as ~ ~~~'~~ ~'
employed in ~-~'
~~ ~% ~ fw ~ ~ ( TITLE ) i n
(DEPT.); and y~
L.IL~~--' ~~ 7~'~~J~tJ...:c3 (NAME) has also served
WHEREAS,
(ADDITIONAL INFORMATION); and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of
Supervisors of Roanoke County expresses its deepest appreciation
and the appreciation of the citizens of Roanoke County to
~~ ~ ~2.~1~U~~J.-~'~ (NAME) for ~'~~~~'S ~~Td~ (N0. )
~~~~~~,
years of capable, loyal and dedicated service to Roanoke County.
FURTHER, the Board of Supervisors does express its best
wishes for a happy, restful and productive retirement.
AT A REGULAR MEETIHELDFATHTHEOROANOKESCOUNTYSADMINISTRATOION
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, (Board Meeting date).
CENTER ON
RESOLUTION __ EXPRESSING THE
APPRECIATION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
/~ OF ROA20KE YEARSYOFOSERVICES•TO•R ANOKE COUNTY.
FOR
James M. St. Clair ( NAME ) wa s f i r s t
WHEREAS,
January 18, (DATE) of 1977 (YEAR) as
employed in
Cross-Connection Inspector (TITLE) in the Public Service Authority
(DEPT.); and
WHEREAS, James M. St. Clair (NAME) has also served
P t nth T nont;.,r, IQQS~-.
the Roanoke County De ar f n 1
a Cross-Connection Inspector.
(ADDITIONAL INFORMATION); and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of
Supervisors of Roanoke County expresses its deepest appreciation
and the appreciation of the citizens of Roanoke County to
(N0.)
James M. St. Clair ( NAME ) f o r 12 years
years of capable, loyal and dedicated service to Roanoke County.
FURTHER, the Board of Supervisors does express its best
wishes for a happy, restful and productive retirement.
O~ a0AN0,f-F
a
~. .~
Z
z
ov a
is E~ as
SFSQUICENTENN~P~
A Beauti~tt/Beginning
(~nixn~~ o~ ~n~tnvke
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR May 2, 1989
ELMER C. HODGE
Mr. John F. Hastings
Senior Development Officers
Virginia Housing Development Authority
13 South 13th Street
Richmond, Virginia 23219
RE: Highgate Apartments
Grouse Pointe Apartments
LEE GARRETT. CHAIRMAN
WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
RICHARD W. ROBERS. VICE-CHAIRMAN
CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
BOB L. JOHNSON
HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
STEVEN A. MCGRAW
CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
HARRY C. NICKENS
VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
Dear Mr. Hastings:
Our Planning Director has reviewed the development proposals
referenced above for conformance with Roanoke County's zoning and
subdivision regulations and comprehensive plan policies, and
determined that both projects meet the established criteria.
Attached are signed copies of Roanoke County's Certification of
Approval regarding the proposed development of Highgate
Apartments and Grouse Pointe Apartments.
If I can assist your further, please contact me.
Sincerely,
/ ' /^
..c.~.- ~dZicl~_
Lee arrett, Chairman
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
LG/mha
CC: Ronald E. Sweeney, Senior Vice President
Sovran Mortgage Corporation
P. 0. Box 466
Richmond, Virginia 23203
P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 2 4018-07 9 8 <703) 772-2004
CERTIFICATION OF APPROVAL
In accordance with Virginia Code Section 36-55.39(B),
the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke
Virginia, hereby certifies to the Virginia Housing Development
Authority its approval of the proposed multi-family residential
housing development called Grouse Pointe Apartments
as expressed in its resolution duly adopted on May 9, 1989
19 I
a certified copy of which igx~~~~~x~f~~x
will be forthcoming.
Board of Supervisors of
Roanoke County Virginia
B y . ~ --__.'_--
Its Chairman
CERTIFICATION OF APPROVAL
In accordance with Virginia Code Section 36-55.39(B),
the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke ,
Virginia, hereby certifies to the Virginia Housing Development
Authority its approval of the proposed multi-family residential
housing development called Highgate Apartments
as expressed in its resolution duly adopted on May 9, 1989
19 a certified copy of which i~xxxXXxs~f~xt~~f~.
~rr~rn
will be forthcoming.
Board of Supervisors of
Roanoke County Virginia
By. ~ _
It C Zairman