Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
6/14/1989 - Regular
4 t ~ AOANp,~.~ ~, 2 ~ ~ az 18 ~ 88 SFSQUICENTENN~P~ ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS A Btauti~tlBc(tinxing ACTION AGENDA JUNE 14, 1989 Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meeting. Regular meetings are held on the second Tuesday and the fourth Tuesday at 3:0 p.m. Public Hearings will be heard at 7:00 p.m on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. A PUBLIC HEARING HAS BEEN SCHEDULED FOR THE AFTERNOON SESSION. A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.) 1. Roll Call ALL PRESENT 2. Invocation: John Chambliss Assistant County Administrator for Human Services 3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag. B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS. ADDITION OF: C-4 RECEIPT OF LETTER FROM PRESIDENT BUSH CONGRATULATING ROANOKE COUNTY ON ALL-AMERICA CITY AWARD C-5 RESOLUTION FROM SCHOOL BOARD CONGRATULATING ROANOKE COUNTY ON AL] AMERICA CITY AWARD OLD BUSINESS - RECONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF VHDA FINANCING FOR PROPOSED DEVELOPMENTS KNOWN AS GROUSE POINT APARTMENTS AND HIGHGATE APARTMENT S C. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS AND AWARDS 1. Announcement of Distinguished Budget Presentation Awar< to Roanoke County. PRESENTED TO RETA BUSHER 2. Announcement of Award for Excellence in governmental reporting to Roanoke County. PRESENTED TO ELMER HODGE AND DIANE HYATT 3. Recognition of John Birckhead, Richard Lively and Larry Onan for receiving Senior Appraiser designation from the American Society of Appraisers 4. Receipt of letter of congratulations from President Bush concerning All America City Award 5. Resolution of Congratulation from Roanoke County Schoo Board concerning All America City Award PRESENTED BY BAYES WILSON AND FRANK THOMAS BLJ REQUESTED APPROPRIATE RECOGNITION TO MERIT SCHOLAR FINALISTS FROM ROANOKE COUNTY OLD BUSINESS 1. Reconsideration of denial of approval for VHDA financing for Grouse Point Apartments and Highgate Apartments R-61489-1 HCN/BLJ SUBSTITUTE MOTION TO RESCIND DENIAL ACTION OF 5/9/89 AND ADOP' RESO OF APPROVAL - URC D. NEW BUSINESS 1. (Item was removed for future consideration.) 2. Request to Virginia Department of Transportation for Revenue Sharing Funds for fiscal year 1989/90. R-61489-2 RR/HCN TO APPROVE SAM - ABSENT AYES - BLJ,RR,HCN,LG 3. Approval of contract for Employee Health Insurance A-61489-3 HCN/RR TO APPROVE ALT. $1 AYE S -RR, HCN, LG NAYS-BLJ, SAM 4. Approval of Consent Special Order for Dixie Cavern Landfill A-61489-4 LG/SAM TO APPROVE URC 5. Appropriation for Virginia Amateur Sports, Inc. A-61489-5 2 BLJ/SAM TO APPROVE ALT. $1 AYES-BLJ, RR, SAM, LG ABSTAIN-HCN 6. Adoption of resolution authorizing the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission to conduct a noise study. R-61489-6 '- BLJ/RR TO APPROVE URC 7. Request for approval of payment for work performed by Olver, Inc. at the Red Hill Site. A-61489-7 HCN/LG TO APPROVE URC 8. Request from Cablevision Committee to fund a portion of the consultant fee. R-61489-8 SAM/HCN TO APPROVE URC E. REQUEST FOR WORK SESSIONS NONE F. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS NONE G. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance vacating a portion of a 25 foot waterline, ingress and egress easement and a portion of a 15 foot public utility easement, recorded in Plat Book 10, Page 41, Section 1, Fairway Forest Estates. HCN/LG TO APPROVE 1ST READING URC - 2ND - 6/27/89 2. Ordinance vacating the southern portion of an unimproved 50 foot right-of-way referred to as "Chelsea Street", recorded in Plat Book 2, Page 170, Section 1, Western Hills Subdivision. 3 HCN/BLJ TO APPROVE 1ST READING URC - 2ND - 6/27/89 3. Ordinance appointing a separate individual to hold the position of Clerk to the governing body and to perform certain duties as specified. SAM/BLJ TO APPROVE 1ST READING URC - 2ND - 6/27/89 4. Ordinance vacating a portion of a 20 foot sanitary sewer easement recorded in Deed Book 1228, page 35 in accordance with Chapter 11, Title 15.1-482 (b) Code of Virginia, 1950. HCN/BLJ TO APPROVE 1ST READING URC - 2ND - 6/27/89 5. Ordinance amending and readopting Section 12-8, Article I of Chapter 12, Motor Vehicles and Traffic, of the Roanoke County Code. HCN/RR TO APPROVE 1ST READING URC - 2ND - 6/27/89 6. Ordinance accepting an offer for and authorizing the sale of 37.86 acres located in the City of Salem. BLJ/SAM TO APPROVE 1ST READING URC - 2ND - 6/27/89 H. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance appropriating funds for the 1989-90 fiscal year budget for Roanoke County. 0-61489-9 HCN/LG AMENDED MOTION TO APPROVE ORD. WITH #5 AMENDED TO INCLUDE °LOCAL° AND THAT STAFF WORK WITH SCHOOL BOARD TO ENSURE THAT INTENT OF THE MOTION IS CARRIED OUT - URC 2. Ordinance authorizing the construction of a public water system to serve a special water service area including real estate along Shadwell Drive in the Bellview Gardens and Bellevue Estates subdivisions. The costs thereof to be imposed upon certain abutting property owners by agreement, providing funds therefor, and directing that an abstract of this ordinance be recorded showing the 4 amount that will be assessed against each such landowner. 0-61489-10 BLJ/RR TO APPROVE ORD URC 3. Ordinance authorizing acquisition of real estate for a pump station, water storage tank, and water line easements for the Old Hollins Road Water Line Project. 0-61489-11 BLJ/HCN TO APPROVE ORD URC 4. Ordinance amending Chapter 7, Buildincr Recrulations of the Roanoke County Code by the addition of Article V, Fees, and increasing same. 0-61489-12 HCN/LG TO APPROVE ORD URC 5. Ordinance increasing the salaries of members of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County pursuant to Section 3.07 of the Roanoke County Charter and Section 14.1-46.01 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended. 0-61489-13 HCN/SAM TO APPROVE AYES-BLJ,RR,SAM,HCN NAYS-LG I. PUBLIC HEARING 689-1 Adoption of a resolution creating the Roanoke County Resource Authority pursuant to the provisions of the Virginia Water and Sewer Authorities act, Chapter 28, Title 15.1, Code of Virginia, as amended. NO ONE SPOKE R-61489-14 HCN/SAM TO APPROVE RESO URC J. APPOINTMENTS 1. Board of Zoning Appeals LG NOMINATED ELDON L. KARR 5 2. Clean Valley Council LG NOMINATED RICHARD ROBERS FOR REAPPOINTMENT 3. Community Corrections Resources Board 4. Fifth Planning District Commission LG NOMINATED RICHARD ROBERS FOR REAPPOINTMENT 5. Landfill Citizens Advisory Committee DICK ROBERS NOMINATED ROBERT HOUSE 6. Parks & Recreation Advisory Commission 7. Court Service Unit Advisory Council/Youth and Family Services Advisory Board K. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS SUPERVISOR ROBERS: (1) ANNOUNCED THAT THE TRIP TO NORTHERN VA. LAST FALL HAS RESULTED IN SECURING FIRST BUSINESS IN ROANOKE VALLEY - DEWBERRY AND DAVIS ENG. AND ARCHITECTURAL FIRM. (2) HAVE ESTABLISHED CONTINUING RELATIONSHIP WITH GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY (3) HAVE BEEN WORKING ON ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT SITES WITH SEVERAL PEOPLE AS A JOINT VENTURE (4) HAVE MET WITH SEVERAL PEOPLE SUCH AS GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY, DR. MCCOMAS AT VPI, AND OTHERS CONCERNING THE SMART HIGHWAY PROPOSAL FOR THE HIGHWAY LINK TO BLACKSBURG (5) THE BOARD MEMBERS HAVE SIGNED THE LETTER GOING TO LOCAL BUSINESSES ASKING THAT THEY VOLUNTARILY BAN THE USE THE PLASTIC AND STYROFOAM CONTAINERS. (6) MEETING WAS HELD OF THE NEWLY FORMED ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE. (7) ASKED THAT THE RECORD REFLECT THAT HE HAD RECEIVED A PROCLAMATION FROM THE CAVE SPRING NATIONAL LITTLE LEAGUE CONCERNING THE 50TH ANNIVERSARY OF LITTLE LEAGUE SUPERVISOR MCGRAW: (1) PLEASED WITH REPORT CONCERNING THE CONSOLIDATION MEETINGS (2) ANNOUNCED THAT BEV FITPATRICK, ROANOKE CITY COUNCILMAN WILL BE ATTENDING THE ROANOKE VALLEY COOPERATION COMMITTEE MEETING (3) THANKED BOARD MEMBERS FOR FUNDING OF BLUE RIDGE REGION AND GAVE MEMBERS A MAP OF BLUE RIDGE REGION. HAVE HIRED A PART-TIME PERSON AT BLUE RIDGE REGION AND ARE UPDATING THE DATA BASE. (4) REPORTED ON ACTIVITIES OF THE GRAYSON COMMISSION. WILL DECIDE PUBLIC HEARING Dj~TE ON. JULY 12. (5) CONTACTED SHERIFF KAVANAUGH ON JUNE 2ND AND ASKED HIM TO RESPOND ON THE PROPOSED PRISON WORK FARM PROPOSED FOR CATAWBA SO HE COULD COMMUNICATE WITH CITIZENS. THERE WAS NO RESPONSE FROM SHERIFF KAVANAUGH AND HE IS NOW READY TO OPPOSE THE LOCATION OF THE WORK FARM IN CATAWBA. THERE WILL BE A MEETING ON JUNE 20TH, 6 7 P.M. AT CATAWBA COMMUNITY CENTER TO DISCUSS CONCERNS WITH CITIZENS. L. CONSENT AGENDA ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY. R-61489-15 HCN/BLJ TO APPROVE WITH ITEMS 6, 7 REMOVED URC BLJ REQUESTED THAT COVER REPORT ONLY BE INCLUDED IN AGENDA PACKET FOR BINGO, RAFFLE AND FIREWORKS PERMITS BLJ/LG TO APPROVE ITEMS 6, 7 URC 1. Approval of Minutes - November 9, 1988 2. Resolution of Support for Edinburgh Square Foundation's request for Section 202 Direct Loan Program funds to construct housing for low income elderly persons. A-61489-15.a 3. Confirmation of Committee Appointments to the Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission. R-61489-15.b 4. Authorization to increase mileage reimbursement for use of personal vehicles while conducting county business. R-61489-15.c 5. Approval of salary increase for the County Administrator and County Attorney A-61489-15.d 6. Approval of Fireworks Permit for Hills Department Store. A-61489-16 7. Approval of Raffle Permit for Vinton Moose Lodge 7 A-61489-17 8. Authorization to execute indemnity agreement - Henry Acres Subdivision A-61489-15.e M. CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS 1. Bruce Hobart and Lou Jamison to speak concerning the proposed development known as Grouse Pointe Apartments. HEARD UNDER OLD BUSINESS N. REPORTS BLJ/LG TO RECEIVE AND FILE UVV 1. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance 2. General Fund Unappropriated Balance 3. Board Contingency Fund 4. Status Report on Street Light Replacement Program 0. WORK SESSION 1. 75/25 Economic Development Strategy WORK SESSION ESTABLISHED FOR 7/25/89 TO INCLUDE MATRIX RATING OF SITES, MORE SPECIFICS ON STRATEGY ECH TO SET UP WORK SESSION ON ECON. DEV. STATELY TO PLANNING COMMISSION AND SET UP JOINT WORK SESSION WITH PLANNING COMMISSION AND BOARD MEMBERS. P. EXECUTIVE SESSION pursuant to the Code of Virginia Section 2.1-344 (3) AND (7) ACQUISITION OF REAL ESTATE, LEGAL CONTRACTS - SPRING HOLLOW RESERVOIR AND CONSOLIDATION. LG/BLJ AT 5:35 P.M. - URC LG/BLJ TO GO INTO OPEN SESSION AT 5:55 P.M. - URC Q. ADJOURNMENT AT 5:56 p.m. 8 ITEM D-1 WAS REMOVED AFTER THE AGENDA PACKET WAS PREPARED FOR DISTRIBUTION. OF FtOANp~~ .a P ~• z c~i A' ~~ a Cn~~~~ ~~ ~~~~~~~ 150 r¢~u ~~ SFSGUICENTENN~P~ ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS A Beauti~ul8eginnin~ AGENDA JUNE 14, 1989 Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meeting. Regular meetings are held on the second Tuesday and the fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public Hearings will be heard at 7:00 p.m on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. A PUBLIC HEARING HAS BEEN SCHEDULED FOR THE AFTERNOON SESSION. A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.) 1. Roll Call. 2. Invocation: John Chambliss Assistant County Administrator for Human Services 3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag. B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS. C. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS AND AWARDS 1. Announcement of Distinguished Budget Presentation Award to Roanoke County. 2. Announcement of Award for Excellence in governmental reporting to Roanoke County. 3. Recognition of John Birckhead, Richard Lively and Larry Onan for receiving Senior Appraiser designation from the American Society of Appraisers D. NEW BUSINESS 1. (Item was removed for future consideration.) 2. Request to Virginia Department of Transportation for Revenue Sharing Funds for fiscal year 1989/90. 3. Approval of contract for Employee Health Insurance 4. Approval of Consent Special Order for Dixie Cavern Landfill 5. Appropriation for Virginia Amateur Sports, Inc. 6. Adoption of resolution authorizing the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission to conduct a noise study. 7. Request for approval of payment for work performed by Olver, Inc. at the Red Hill Site. 8. Request from Cablevision Committee to fund a portion of the consultant fee. E. REQUEST FOR WORK SESSIONS F. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS G. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance vacating a portion of a 25 foot waterline, ingress and egress easement and a portion of a 15 foot public utility easement, recorded in Plat Book 10, Page 41, Section 1, Fairway Forest Estates. 2. Ordinance vacating the southern portion of an unimproved 50 foot right-of-way referred to as "Chelsea Street", recorded in Plat Book 2, Page 170, Section 1, Western Hills Subdivision. 3. Ordinance appointing a separate individual to hold the position of Clerk to the governing body and to perform certain duties as specified. 4. Ordinance vacating a portion of a 20 foot sanitary sewer easement recorded in Deed Book 1228, page 35 in accordance with Chapter 11, Title 15.1-482 (b) Code of Virginia, 1950. 2 5. Ordinance amending and readopting Section 12-8, Article I of Chapter 12, Motor Vehicles and Traffic, of the Roanoke County Code. 6. Ordinance accepting an offer for and authorizing the sale of 37.86 acres located in the City of Salem. H. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance appropriating funds for the 1989-90 fiscal year budget for Roanoke County. 2. Ordinance authorizing the construction of a public water system to serve a special .water service area including real estate along Shadwell Drive in the Bellview Gardens and Bellevue Estates subdivisions. The costs thereof to be imposed upon certain abutting property owners by agreement, providing funds therefor, and directing that an abstract of this ordinance be recorded showing the amount that will be assessed against each such landowner. 3. Ordinance authorizing acquisition of real estate for a pump station, water storage tank, and water line easements for the Old Hollins Road Water Line Project. 4. Ordinance amending Chapter 7, Building Regulations of the Roanoke County Code by the addition of Article V, Fees, and increasing same. 5. Ordinance increasing the salaries of members of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County pursuant to Section 3.07 of the Roanoke County Charter and Section 14.1-46.01 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended. I. PUBLIC HEARING 689-1 Adoption of a resolution creating the Roanoke County Resource Authority pursuant to the provisions of the Virginia Water and Sewer Authorities act, Chapter 28, Title 15.1, Code of Virginia, as amended. J. APPOINTMENTS 3 1. Board of Zoning Appeals 2. Clean Valley Council 3. Community Corrections Resources Board 4. Fifth Planning District Commission 5. Landfill Citizens Advisory Committee 6. Parks & Recreation Advisory Commission 7. Court Service Unit Advisory Council/Youth and Family Services Advisory Board K. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS L. CONSENT AGENDA ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY. 1. Approval of Minutes - November 9, 1988 2. Resolution of Support for Edinburgh Square Foundation's request for Section 202 Direct Loan Program funds to construct housing for low income elderly persons. 3. Confirmation of Committee Appointments to the Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission. 4. Authorization to increase mileage reimbursement for use of personal vehicles while conducting county business. 5. Approval of salary increase for the County Administrator and County Attorney 6. Approval of Fireworks Permit for Hills Department Store. 7. Approval of Raffle Permit for Vinton Moose Lodge 4 8. Authorization to execute indemnity agreement - Henry Acres Subdivision M. CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS 1. Bruce Hobart and Lou Jamison to speak concerning the proposed development known as Grouse Pointe Apartments. N. REPORTS 1. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance 2. General Fund Unappropriated Balance 3. Board Contingency Fund 4. Status Report on Street Light Replacement Program O. WORK SESSION 1. 75/25 Economic Development Strategy P. EXECUTIVE SESSION pursuant to the Code of Virginia Section 2.1-344 Q . ADJOURNMENT 5 s ~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON WEDNESDAY, JUNE 14, 1989 RESOLUTION 61489-1 REQUESTING APPROVAL TO THE VIRGINIA HOUSING DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE PROPOSED MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL HOUSING DEVELOPMENTS KNOWN AS THE GROUSE POINTS APARTMENTS AND HIGHGATE APARTMENTS BE IT RESOLVED by Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia as follows: WHEREAS, the Virginia Housing Development Authority is considering the financing of two multi-family residential housing developments to be situated in Roanoke County; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 36-55.39 (B) of the Code of Virginia, the Virginia Housing Development Authority is required to request from the governing body of the locality a Certificate of Approval or Disapproval and certified resolution expressing its approval or disapproval; and WHEREAS, The Planning Director for Roanoke County reviewed the development proposals for Grouse Pointe Apartments and Highgate Apartments and determined that both projects conform to the County's zoning and subdivision regulations and comprehensive plan policies. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia does hereby grant its approval to the proposed multi-family residential housing developments known as the Grouse Pointe Apartments and Highgate Apartments; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the action of the Board of ,~ Supervisors on May 9, 1989 to deny approval of the proposed developments is hereby rescinded, and that a certified copy of this resolution be sent to the Virginia Housing Development Authority informing them of the Board of Supervisors approval of the proposed development projects. On motion of Supervisor Nickens to rescind action of May 9, 1989 and adopt prepared resolution, seconded by Supervisor Johnson, and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: ~- Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors 6/16/89 CC: File Virginia Housing Development Authority Terry Harrington, Director of Planning Lewis Jamison, Old Heritage Builders . _ , AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON WEDNESDAY, JUNE 14, 1989 RESOLUTION REQUESTING APPROVAL TO THE VIRGINIA HOUSING DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE PROPOSED MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL HOUSING DEVELOPMENTS KNOWN AS THE GROUSE POINTE APARTMENTS AND HIGHGATE APARTMENTS BE IT RESOLVED by Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia as follows: WHEREAS, the Virginia Housing Development Authority is considering the financing of two multi-family residential housing developments to be situated in Roanoke County; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 36-55.39 (B) of the Code of Virginia, the Virginia Housing Development Authority is required to request from the governing body of the locality a. Certificate of Approval or Disapproval and certified resolution expressing its approval or disapproval; and WHEREAS, The Planning Director for Roanoke County reviewed the development proposals for Grouse Pointe Apartments and Highgate Apartments and determined that both projects conform tc the County's zoning and subdivision regulations and comprehensive plan policies. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia does hereby grant its approval to the proposed multi-family residential housing developments known as the Grouse Pointe Apartments and Highgate Apartments; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the action of the Board of Supervisors on May 9, 1989 to deny approval of the proposed developments is hereby rescinded, and that a certified copy of this resolution be sent to the Virginia Housing Development Authority informing them of the Board of Supervisors approval of the proposed development projects. y+uuuuruuurruuuuuuuuuuuruuuuuuuuurrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrurruuururuuuuuruuuururuuu __ = APPEARANCE REQUEST _ AGENDA ITEM NO. SUBJECT_~~~vs~ ~o ~.~ G~~.a2r~,~.S _= I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to __ recognize me during the public hearing on the above~matter = so that I may comment.WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, - I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE = RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES - LISTED BELOW. c • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. T'he chairman will c decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. • Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Ques- bons of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. • All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. c • Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments =_ with the clerk. • INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO DEPUTY CLERK m~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~-a AT THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HCENTER ONETUESDAYE JUNET14~1989STRATION RESOLUTION 61489-2 REQUESTING SPECIAL ALLOCATION OF REVENGE SHARING FUNDS FROM VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TO IMPROVE GIVENS AVENUE (ROUTE 1109), ROADS IN HUNTING HILLS SUBDIVISION AND CHAUCER'S COURT (ROUTE 1794) BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That, Resolution 5989-12.c is hereby recinded. 2. That this matter came this day to be heard upon the application of Roanoke County for Givens Avenue (Route 1109), property owners along Chaucer's Court (Route 1794, and the developers of Hunting Hills Subdivision for drainage and road improvements. 3, That in accordance with Section 33.1-75.1 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, State matching allocation is available to improve, maintain, construct, or reconstruct State Highways within the County. 4. As an inducement to adopt this resolution, Old Heritage Corporation (Developer of Hunting Hills Subdivision) and the property owners of Chaucer's Court have agreed to pay to the County's General Fund the equivalent amount of the local share needed for the State's matching allocation and will deposit these funds with the Roanoke County Treasurer's Office within 30 days upon receiving notification that the Commonwealth Transportation Commission has approved State matching allocation for these two projects. 5. That, Roanoke County has presently or will make available from County General Funds the local share of the drainage improvements on Givens Avenue upon receiving notification by the Commonwealth Transportation Commission of the approval of the State's matching allocation. 6. That, Roanoke County and the Virginia Department of Transportation construct drainage improvements on and adjacent to Givens Avenue, improve roads in Huntings Hills Subdivision, and Chaucer's Court, and that funds be allocated for the local share of these projects and be available to the Virginia Department of Transportation at the appropriate time. 7. That, the Virginia Department of Transportation and the Commonwealth Transportation Commission is hereby requested pursuant to Section 33.1-75.1 of the State Code, to make available an equivalent matching fund allocation for the improvements of the following priority projects: Priority #l: Drainage Improvements on Givens Avenue- Revenue Sharing Request = $32,500. Priority #2: Roadways In Hunting Hills Subdivision- Revenue Sharing Request = $87,500. Priority #3: Road Improvements on Chaucer's Court - Revenue Sharing Request = $22,500. in the total amount of $142,500 or the adjusted amount made available to Roanoke County. 8. That the County Administrator of Roanoke County or his designee be authorized to take such action and execute such 2 documents as may be necessary to accomplish these projects, upon form as approved by the County Attorney. On motion of Supervisor Robers, seconded by Supervisor Nickens and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor McGraw A COPY TESTE: /`~' Mary H. llen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Paul Mahoney, County Attorney Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance Reta Busher, Director, Mangement & Budget Phillip Henry, Director, Engineering Arnold Covey, Director, Development & Inspection and Copy for Virginia Department of Transportation 3 ACTION # ITEM NUMBER." 1.. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD A'I' THE ROANOKE OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: June 14, 1989 AGENDA ITEM: Request for Revenue Sharing Funds for FY 89-90 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'Sn COMMENTS: _ ~ 3 (YV~ ii~ti~Vw /` ` J ~ ~~~~ ~ ~~ BACKGROUND At the April 11, 1989, meeting the Board of Supervisors approved Roanoke County Requesting Revenue Sharing Funds for three projects. A. Roadway Improvements in the HuntingoHement would fall Subdivision - Roads considered for imp under the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) Rural Addition Policy and eligible for state matching money. The developer of Hun~~ng de thehlocal share op to $90,000 of their funds to p Revenue Sharing Funds. B. Drainage Improvements on and adjacent to Givens Avenue (Route 1109) - This project is on the Board approved Drainage Maintenance Project List and is to address flooding of Givens Avenue and adjoining properties. The Revenue Sharing Request is $32,500 of a projfundedsth~ough5the0FY 89e90eDrainagecBudget. would be C, Roadway Improvements on Chaucera~eCoequestingethat4) The property owners on this roadway this roadway be upgraded to include curb and gutter, drainage facilities and bituminous pavement. The property owners are willing to fund the 50~ local share. The Revenue Sharing Request is in the amount of $22,500. The total Revenue Sharing Request was $142,500. _~ By letter dated May 12, 1989, Board Chairman, Lee Garrett was notified by VDOT that the Statewide request for Revenue Sharing Funds was in excess of test$maoedOthatvRoanoke County on the information available they would be eligible for an estimated $83,700 of Revenue Sharing Funds. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: rojects have been identified as meeting the Three p Funds for FY 89-90 in the amount requirements for Revenue Sroximate $83,700 may be available to of $142,500. Only app needs to Roanoke County for FY 89-90, therefore, Roanoke County Funds establish priority of the three project~osectsVenue Sharing would be allocated to highest priority p j Staff would recommend the following priority based on the merits of each project: Priority #1: Drainage Improvements on t' menproblem with This project would addressbothothe General Public and benefits ro erty ownersdinythe area. specific p p Priority #2~ Roads in Hunting Hills Subdivision - TH ills were approximate 14 roads in the Hunt i rgvate Subdivision which were developed originrovedauspng funds roads. Many of these roads will be imp from the 1985 Road Bond. The additional funds generated by Revenue Sharing would assist in upgrading the remaining roads to State Standards. The developer is providing the local match funds. Priority #3: Chaucer's Court - Chaucen~theoCanterbury presently a State Mainta~oeosedaamprovements are a Park Subdivision. The p surface and facilities, but 'betterment to the roadway provided no substae~~alownersaaretwipllbngctoaprovided welfare. The prop y the 50~ local funding. ALTERNATIVES AND IMPACTS Based on the latestdoesornotlappear thatgRoan ke County of Transportation (VDOT) it 2 -~- will receive the full request for Revenue Sharing Funds, therefore, Roanoke County needs to establish a priority of projects for the allocation of the available furoved FhY 89c90 share of the Givens Avenue Project is in the app Drainage Budget and exp heSeearly RoadwayeBudgetnd survey work on h ad packages is in t Y t e ro STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors approve the amended resolution requesting special allocation (Revenue Sharing Funds) from the Virginia Department °ioritns#2,tRoads (VDOT) to imgills Subdivis#on,Gandnpriority~#3 Road Improvements in Hunting on Chaucer's Court. APPROVED BY: SUBMITTED BY: .~' Phillip T. Henry, P Director of Engineering ~~ ~ Elmer C. Ho ge County Administrator ------------------ VOTE ---------- - ACTION No yeS Abp Approved ( ) Motion by: Garrett -.. Denied ( ) Johnson Received ( ) McGraw -- Referred Nickens .- To Robers .1i "1 '~_ NORTH ~~ ~~ ....~ Avg ~~ // - - PROPOSED 24" \ STORM SEWER / _~ -- -- 1 ~ -- t ~/ / - 1 s PROPOSED 20' _ 4 / / DRAINAGE BSTM.'T `- ~~ ~ ,~ ~ ~ M, ~ ~ ~ .~ .- ~ ._ t~ ' , MSDECO SECURITY w~ 1 LOCKS i. 1 ,t ... 1 ' •~ 1 ' ,'k 1 I ` . 1 E%IST. 30" STORM SEWER I ., _ ~.. V W. MAIN ST. RT. 460 COMMUNITY SERVICES AND DEVELOPMENT GIVEN AVENUE DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS 4 COMMUNITY SERVICES a ND DEVELOPMENT CHAUCER'S COTTRT ROAD AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEl~II?NTS . - 5 ~~ AT THE REGULAR MEETINHELD ATETHEp'ROANOKEUCOUNTYOADMOINISTRATION COUNTY, VIRGINIA, CENTER ON TUESDAY, JUNE 14, 1989 RESOLUTION REQUESTING SPECIAL ALLOCATION OF REVENUE SHARING FUNDS FROM VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATIONNG HILLSOSUBDIVISIONVANDECHAUCER'5109), ROADS IN HUNTI COURT (ROUTE 1794) BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That, Resolution 5989-12.c is hereby recinded. 2, That this matter came this day to be heard upon the application of Roanoke County for Givens Avenue (Route 1109), property owners along Chaucer's Court (Route 1794, and the developers of Hunting Hills Subdivision for drainage and road improvements. 3. That in accordance with Section 33.1-75.1 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, State matching allocation is available to improve, maintain, construct, or reconstruct State Highways within the County. 4, As an inducement to adopt this resolution, Old Heritage Corporation (Developer of Hunting Hills Subdivision) and the property owners of Chaucer's Court have agreed to pay to the County's General Fund the equivalent amount of the local share needed for the State's matching allocation and will deposit these funds with the Roanoke County Treasurer's Office within 30 days upon receiving notification that the Commonwealth Transportation Commission has approved State matching allocation for these two projects. 6 - 5. That, Roanoke County has presently or will make available from County General Funds the local share of the drainage improvements on Givens Avenue upon receiving notification by the Commonwealth Transportation Commission of the approval of the State's matching allocation. (. That, Roanoke County and the Virginia Department of Transportation construct drainage improvements on and adjacent to Givens Avenue, improve roads in Huntings Hills Subdivision, and Chaucer's Court, and that funds be allocated for the local share of these projects and be available to the Virginia Department of Transportation at the appropriate time. 7, That, the Virginia Department of Transportation and the Commonwealth Transportation Commission is hereby requested pursuant to Section 33.1-75.1 of the State Code, to make available an equivalent matching fund allocation for the improvements of the following priority projects: Priority #1: Drainage Improvements on Givens Avenue- Revenue Sharing Request = $32,500. Priority #2: Roadways In Hunting Hills Subdivision- Revenue Sharing Request = $87,500. Priority #3: Road Improvements on Chaucer's Court - Revenue Sharing Request = $22,500. in the total amount of $142,500 or the adjusted amount made available to Roanoke County. 7 ~.LJ g. That the County Administrator of Roanoke County or his designee be authorized to take such action and execute such documents as may be necessary to accomplish these projects, upon form as approved by the County Attorney. 8 A-61489-3 ACTION NUMBER # ~~~ ITEM NUMBER T A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARS OpUNTYE ADMINISTRATIONNOCENTER A COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANO MEETING DATE: June 14, 1989 ITEM: Approval of Contract for Employee Health Insurance AGENDA COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ,~ rff r ~ ~ S O~ , ~~ ~vrya.-~,wov~t BACKGROUND: reviews employee health insurance The county staff annually e and makes recommendations to the Board of Sup~pioyees on coverag remium amounts paid by Director of the level ofThesereview waspconducted by D. K. Cook, and we the county. and Diane D. Hyatt, Director of Finance, Human Resources, ou that our claims experstaff also used are pleased to report to Y ear. County favorable for the current contract y count 's current contract ' es of an independent health insurancy consultant in the the servic lggg , review of proposed alternatives. inia expires June 30, ear beginning with Blue Cross/Blue Shield of Virg obtained from Blue Cross/ In the review of alteina~oposalowashe contract y ear, esti July 1, 1989, a renewa p For the current contract y inia. the county, Blue Shield of Virg contributions by mated health insuranemployees care projected as follows and contributions by $750,000 475,000 Estimated Claims Paid on Behalf of Employees County Contributions 275,000 Employee Contributions SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: sal negotiated with Blue Croc~easuinghutilizat on~and The propo a roximately contains a moderate 1nHealth caretcosts are rising health care health care trends. h our experience in utilizing the county 20~ per year, althoug ro osal submitted, costs has been much less. In the p p ro ram able to maintain the same lever scriptionldrug pt 5 no will be rovided. The p reduction in services p a ment in full be continued with payment in fullresent planauptyble is pai will tion. Under the p for each prescrip the employee for each is made after a $6 deductible is paid by I ~ r- '' } ^rescription for brand name drugs ardbranddname ldrugs wi d fbe p The deductible fo s will be generic drugs• and the deductible for generic drug eneric increased to $1©- urchase of g decreased to $2 in order tooup cs h agthtcare costs. The deduthe drugs as a savings in the g rogram is the only change ible in the prescription drug p coverages or co-payment deductibles recommenstaffoare p esented The alternatives considered by county year. to you in this report. ALTERNATIVE 1: the traditional funding arrangement with In this alternative, inia is continued. Blue Cross Blue Cross/Blue ShieldmentVofgclaims, pre-admisiannoffers~ the would continue the pay roviders managed care . The Blue Crhssic ans, inl that medical p advantage of participating A Y and reasonable charges agree to accept the usual, customary, lan also established by Blue Cross/Blue Shield of Virginia. The P most offers the advantage in t countylwouldralsoceontinue tooreceive medical providers. The hospitals in the Blue hospital discounts for the participating The proposed rates for Cross/Bluea~ivelwould berasnfollowsWOrk. this altern Monthl Health nsurance Rates Employee Famil $98.73 $240.02 Blue Cross/Blue Shield Rate 26.25 126.32 Cost to Employee * 10.77 24.64 Increase to Employee contribution of $45, and an addi- *This cost reflects the lement from the county of $250,000 tional health care suPp budget. approved in the 1989-90 county ALTERNATIVE 2: the traditional funding arrangement with In this alternative, inia is continued. Blue Cross Blue Cross/Blue ShieadmentV ofgclaims, pre-admission review, and would continue the p Y ro osed for managed care. The differeitionaltco t ncreaselisrpapive aof Alternative 1 is that no add employees, although additional funds in the amount county ro riated balance for the $92,000to°fundbaddgtionalf costs e ThepproPosed rates for this county alternative would be as follows. Monthl Blue Cross/Blue Shield Rate Cost to Employee Increase to Employee Health In: EmAloyee $98 3 15.48 0 surance Rates Famil $240.02 101.68 0 of $45, and an addi- *This cost reflects the lement from thencounty of $250,000 tional health care supp budget, plus $92,000 from the approved in the 1989-90 county unappropriated balance. FISCAL IMPACT: In the comparison of Alternative 1 and Alternative 2, the county would continue the traditonaiafundnnAlternativee2, dd~.tional Cross/Blue Shield of Virgin funds in the amount of $92heo 0 ooY tolfu d additional costs t e unappropriated balance for t RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that Alternative 1 be approved and that the county accept the renewal of Blu ul riss1989e Shield of Virginia for the contract year beginning J y SUBMITTED BY: D. K. Cook Director of Human Resources z~PPROVFD BY ~i~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ------- ___-_____-- ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs p,pproved (x) Motion by: Harrv C N-i-~k~s~ rrett x Denied ( ) Richard W Robers to aoprov~hnson ~ Received ( ) Alternative #1 McGraw Referred Nickens -~ To Rober s __x_ cc: File D. Keith Cook, Director, Human Resources Assistant County Administrators Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance Reta Busher, Director, Management & Budget Lee Linkus, Employees Advisory Committee ~'ne~it d es X~ ~n~y,~ ~ EmQloYo ees so ~ ,;Q~/k~' etnP on ~ ~2 C e SY'iel to th se e d e 1 ng lu s o aV tY,e ees Ot ~uP CC°ss~B oUr o A~~e~ n to Si EAC in ~~PloY ~~an ~ sling sign' and wls of tpe 2p; ~~reC In eX~ lease ~eete Chairman to ~c e s~"emdn`i~~e bo are ~ ous ' ,.. S~ 1 s°rY C tment o Lee j, A out de f~rwaz ar merit . plea L~~~ s DeP Sne~ ,~' ' / TO: EMPLOYEES ADVISORY COMMITTEE ees who have opted to put the $42 County are We, the undersigned employ the benefit benefit toward insura do noth agreeawith discontinuing S ie , very disappointed and in July 1989. Further, we were made aware of this after budge approval and feel we are due s°rbenefitmat ward Wotherl insurance enough employees using thi a proximately 125 employees) that warrants further consideration ~ p aid benefit for the last 10 years and we This has been a County-p then fear for what will be taken nex elf itse If that ishthe tcase,ls o standardize County and School ben increases on July 1, the County employees should o eeslve their pay the same as the School emp Y ear before ested that the Employee Advisory Committee app It is requ ervisors at their meeting on May 23, 1989, and make the Board of Sup ositive manner. It is our wishes known to them in aivenmannexplanation of why this is further requested that we be g~ disqualified under Section 89. --~~=-~-- --- ---j ------ ------------------ -----------~ _~1~~=------- ~~~' ~' I i T0: EMPLOYEES ADVISORY COMMITTEE We, the undersigned employees who have opted to put the $42 County benefit toward Blue Cross/Blue Shield insurance, are very disappointed and do not agree with discontinuing the benefit in July 1989, for the employees who have insurances other than Blue Cross/BovalSandlf eel we Further, we were made aware of this after budget gPP to ees using this are due more information. We feel roximatelye125 employees) that benef it toward other insurance (app y- aid benef it for warrants further consideration. This has been a Count p the last 10 years and we fear for what will be taken next! We are told that this is to standardize County and School benef ita• increases1ontJulyale~ then the County employees should receive their p y the same as the Schoool employees. uested that the Employee Advisory Committee appear before the It is req 23 1989, and make our Board of Supervisors at their meetinos tiveymanner. It is further wishes known to them in a firm anlanation of why this is disqualif ied requested that we be given an exp under Section 89. T \ C~ ~~ vi IYCI ` l ~/ ,~+~, ` ~ C~ <:;'' T0: EMPLOYEES ADVISORY COMMITTEE We, the undersigned employees who have opted to put the $42 County ointed for the benefit toward Blwithrdiscontinuinglthenbenefit~ inrJulyr198gsapp and do not agree employees who have insurances other than Blue Cross /B ovalsandlf eel we Further, we were made aware of this after budget aPP to ees using this are due more information. We feel there are enough eipo ees) that benefit toward other insurance (approximately 125 ~P y aid benefit for warrants further consideration. This has been a County-p~ We are told that the last 10 years and we fear for what will be taken next. this is to standardize Counhyoulddreceive theirlpay increaseslontJulyale~ then the County employees s the same as the Schoool employees. ar bef ore the It is requested that the Employee Advisory Committee apps Board of Supervisors at their meeting on May 23, 1989, and make our wishes known to them in a firm and positive manner. It is further ----~~^~tion of why this is disqualified .a;~ ~~`~ ~~C~~~~ T0: EMPLOYEES ADVISORY COMMITTEE We, the undersigned empceyotherh th n B1ueeCross/Blueh Shield ~uare benefit toward insuran very disappointed and do not agree with discontinuing the benef t 1n July 1989 . Further e duewmoreminformation f Wel feelttheredare approval and feel we ar enough employees usinog ees 1 that warrants fu rhertconsideratione (approximately 125 empl y ) This has been a County-paid benefit-for the last 10 years and we fear for what will be to 0 1 benelfitse If thatdishthetcase,lthen standardize County and Sch increases on July 1, the County employees should receive their pay the same as the School employees. It is requested that the Employee Advisory Committee appear before the Board of Supervisors atlnhai firmtand posit ve /manner.an Itais our wishes known to them further requested that we be given an explanation of why this is dis ifie d r ec 'on 89. -~~~ ~ _~ T0: ~~j~~~------------ ------------------------------ ~~,p1 Oth o~,e ------------------------------ Al v In er the Ut j --------- • e --------------- t ------ --- yo yr sores _es~e ~ BZ ~e .2j h9 ------ 1 ed de co jn cro ~4 ---------- Sher se poor rr~til ~~ exp Ss/~ coU 1~.~, rwa ent ee, A ess 1Ue n~~, ----------- s ~ep~ to Lo a eedse 9 yO~ Shield ld ~ ------------ tr~e~~ee L1~ ~~ cj9~ r coy ene~j ~ ko~s Leo' A~ cern t s -------_ ° ~ C'h aid er t a~eh air wls all ° th ---- k.~Q~n of to chose ----------- -- ~ s the l9n ------------- ~~/a ~A -------- 9 C'. for Ins~ra~c Erg pI e eni °~'e h~veZo~,ee s Z~ done 1n the so ~ ~O ,Maya Be°e~y loYee es yn mP e soy Cou° ~yeld o the ~ emQlo ao,~e 5 ~2 oe S 5 t hose haV e the Utitii2 Cro95~B1 C°,pCe ~ all ~ sy~3° C ~ y'~ toPloY than Bl~`e 5~~ ~-r'`~ S yg'~' ' a a an °~ tre ~A T~' Ot~,ez n eX°~ leas ~~eote Ch``y~~ C e5~e mytte h° a~ e 1 k~J~ , y,~te C°~ rt W Lee L r ; Aar is d paC ward t° eat , t e °r e'Qarts° o~ £ O ,rlea'S Ff ` 9 TO: EMPLOYEES ADVISORY COMMITTEE ut the $42 County We, the undersigned employees who have opted to p are the benefit benefit toward insurance oth ar reeawith discontinuing Shiel ' et very disappointed and do not g in July 1989. Further, we were made aware of this after bu g a royal and feel we are due morbenefitmatoward Wotherl insurance pp employees using thi that warrants further consideration. enough 125 employees) (approximately aid benefit for the last 10 years and we This has been a County-p then ar for what will be taken next fitse If that ishthetcase,ls o fe and School bene standardize County a increases on July 1, the County employees should receive their p Y ees. the same as the School emP oY ear before ested that the Employee Advisory Committee aPP and make It is requ ervisors at their meeting on May 23, 1989, It is the Board of Sup ositive manner• this is our wishes known to them in alVe~anneXplanation of whY further requested that we be g~ f~' lified under Section 89. 1 ~~. = -..1 ~ ~ ,~1,~~~,~----- u---=------------- j ~~.~~.1 -- - ~ TO: EMPLOYEES ADVISORY COMMITTEE We, the undersigned employees who have opted to put the $42 County benefit toward insurance other than Blue Cross/Blue Shield, are very disappointed and do not agree with discontinuing the benefit in July 1989. Further, we were made aware of Wel feelt theredare approval and feel we are due more information. enough employees using this benefit toward other insurance (approximately 125 employees) that warrants further consideration. This has been a County-paid benefit for the last 10 years and we fear for what will be taken next! We are told that this is to standardize Coionteesnshould receiveltheirIpayhincreases on July In the County emp y the same as the School employees. It is requested that the Employee Advisory Committee appear before the Board of Supervisors at their meeting on May 23, 1989, and make our wishes known thath we be givenman nexplanati n of why this is further requested ' lified under Section 89. _ 2~ ------ ~-~-~ _~--- ---- ----'---- _~ _ _ v-------- •- L -L~~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -,y- - - - - - - ~-~ k ! ~_i -~. W/l! - ~ ~ ~ l ~ i ~ , 1 ~ f . ~ ! -, j - ~, 9 - ~ . { f~. y, t:~ .. ~ _. { ~ - ._. , . . / ~ l~ ~ ,. .. ~. ~n ,pa e~~~' ZoY es ~ ~~ v ::~~-~~ id ~~ ees 5 42 COU Sr eld o tyre ~ eP~p-~o acre 50 .~~Zln9 sy/Blue eY~'s ~ t.~°se ha~P tpe c 1 n ri ees Ot l~ae CYO aY c p, ter ~ t° el EP'C' 1 B Yo ~ ~mQ1.oY ~~1an e5sin9 5i9°' and w ri o~ tr Tp = ptY,eY in eX° P-~ea a~~ecte C,RaiYma P Y eSte m~t~ee o aY P l~,kous ~ ynt . , Cow t Wh e .~, , . Zf soYY tme° o Le Aav i aepaY ward tment . ouY foY ar Y lease f ` s ~eP TO: EMPLOYEES ADVISORY COMMITTEE We, the undersigned employees who have opted to put the $42 County benefit toward insurance other than Blue Cross/Blue Shield, are very disappointed and do not agree with discontinuing the benefit in July 1989. Further, we were made aware of this after budget approval and feel we are due more information. We feel there are enough employees using this benefit toward other insurance (approximately 125 employees) that. warrants further consideration. This has been a County-paid benefit for the last 10 years and we fear for what will be taken next! We are told that this is to standardizeemoloteesnshouldoreceiveltheirlpayhincreases onsJuly In the County p Y the same as the School employees. It is requested that the Employe 'ttee a ear before the Board of Supervisors at thei our wishes known to them in a further requested that we be gi di alified under Section 89. -, r -- ~~ = ~ -( ----- -r-,~ ~, , e Advisory Comma pp r meeting on May 23, 1989, and make firm and positive manner. It is ven an explanation of why this is ------------------------ y ~4 .4a „~ e e ae ,G~e G°J~'t'~'e~a o5 ~° ~n g~ Ca 1r r ~ 0.Z ,y0e 5 °nGe{t a1 ti° e ~A ' ~yti c o55 ~ B ~°o~ c 4'~,a ~a °~5 ~ 1$ a ee5 O B~Oe e55 5e e~~e cY,a -~r0.r '~-°~ ~Y'a e~4{ lea a~ 005 ~ fi ~r . ~o . ~o met ~e8 yet ~ ~° at yyr o ~a r e e'~e Go~ p'° ,~° 1'~c . ~ y°y°t~ at'~ ata t~t~er Z ~ y ae4 °~~ a tiea5 ~~, 5 ~e TO: EMPLOYEES ADVISORY COMMITTEE o ted to put the $42 County We, the undersigned employees who have p are the benefit efit toward insurance other reeawith discontinuing Shiel , t ben very disappointed and do not ag Jul 1989. Further, we were made aware of this after u ge in Y royal and feel we are due morbenefit~at ward Wotherl insurance enough employees using thl that warrants further consideration. (approximately 125 employees) ears and we This has been a County-paid benefit for the last 10 y ~ We are told that this 1 then fear for what will be taken next. increases on July 1- standardize County and Schoo~eCeiveltheirlpay at is the case, the County employees should to ees. the same as the School emp Y ear before ested that the Employee Advisory Committee aPP and make It is requ ervisors at their meeting on May 23, 1989, the Board of Sup and positive manner. It is our wishes known to them in a iven °an explanation of why this is further requested that we be g disqualified under Section 89. _Z~ ~~~'~_ ~%~s--------- ------------------------ ---- --f="-`==-Lip=~=-l1---~"`------------- ------------ -----------------• - ----------- -=- -- _-~~~.~.~~L.~: --- '- -------- a `s~ a ~c, e .4~ '~eeea~vr g r o e a o Mpg gg 10~'~e ~t coAryti ~yg o~ ~c,~ lg A O~~ oe C{ o yn~ a~~rea a a ~~,Q'~ 5 eg 01 egg ge eon Gr X~ 1°~ 'L~'a~ e~'4t ,lea a~~"o~g ~'~ ~r ~4et i° e~4te~t'X is r O ~ ~~r yea ~'~'~ ~~'° ee v ~ `t ete c°tc~`e~,ti ~o ~,~ . s yn ot~ atti a{a t~~e TO: EMPI,pYEES ADVISORY COMMITTEE o ted to put the $42 County ned employees who have p are We, the undersig the benefit ward insurance other thawi~h discontinuing Shiel et benefit tO ointed and do not agree very disapp 9. Further, we were made aware of W i geelt there are in July 198 a royal and feel we an due more informat on•ther this benefit toward °tconsideration. PP employees usi g enough 125 employees) that warrants fur ears and we approximately aid benefit for the last 10 y This has been a 11 be t ken next! We are told that this i then fear forize County and School benVeitheir p Y at is the case, standard ees should recei a increases on July 1. the County employ to ees. the same as the School emp Y Committee appear before ested that the Employee Advisory 23~ 1989 and make It is raga ervisors at their meeting on May the Board of Sup to them in a f irm and Positive manner • this is our wishes known iven an explanation of why further requested that we be g disqualified under Section 89. _____________________________ _-- ---____-- ~-~ _~_r~) _____________________________ 3 t ~ au5 daa s ~ asea ob ~uaw~~ exeM~ edap ~r ~ ro I °~ aa2 °~ ~vaw~ } ~ }°s . ~ ~Z 00 acv . u-n~1'~' "a ~ , snox e~ a ~e ° aa~~-c pa~sa ~ ~~ S ~teu0 a~oa3~ eaTd a UZ g uew p a5 ~,dX a~~0 :OS' b ~ ~° tM p~,e .u~,is 6~~55a ve~~ otdw3 at ~ 0 u6 su o~ ~ 5 .~a~~u o ~o°~' So~O an is ~ saa~' a~,eLl ago~l~ Z SU~aa arta~~ 6u~ZZt ~o od d~ au~ °~ pZa ~~ no0 Z~ $ ~a~ pte 3 ,rt TO: EMPLOYEES ADVISORY COMMITTEE o ted to put the $42 County We, the undersigned employees who have P are benefit toward insurance other than Blue Cross/Blue Shiel , ree with discontinuing the benefit very disappointed and do not ag Jul 1989. Further, we were made aware of this after budge in Y a royal and feel we are due morbenefitmat ward Wotherl insurance PP employees using thl that warrants further consideration. enough 125 employees) ears and we (approximately aid benefit for the last 10 y This has been a County-p We are told that this lthen fear for what will be taken next! If that is the case, standardize County and School benefits. ees should receive their pay increases on July 1, the County employ ees. the same as the School employ ear before ested that the Employee Advisory Committee aPP and make It is requ ervisors at their meeting on May 23., 1989, the Board of Sup ositive manner. It is our wishes known to them in a f irm an p iven an explanation of why this is further requested that we be g disqualified fi',nd~ er~~ Section 89 . _~~y~ . „ ~ C~~ _'=~_` ~``------~ -1--- - ~~ ~4 ayv ,~,~,e e eta e ~.~,e ~a ~o o~ r yr ~ e r. o C°J 5~`y e~,o5a-y~- o ~1 SAC' c 1 .~yti Gt o ~° ~a an 5 ~- O'~ y~e y~g 5yg ea ay~~ ar ee~' p ~ e55 5e eG~ Gr Xr ,-°~ era e~~{ ,.ea af.~-o~5' ~r ~~4 e~ ,~~, e , 4 t e ~~ a~ met e Co e~,~ ~o ~~, . ~ y 5°t~ a~~ aid ~,°~e ~a~ .~/ ae4~o~ ~e4a T0: EMPLOYEES ADVISORY COMMITTEE ees who have opted to put the $42 County ar We, the undersigned employ the benefit benefit toward insurance t a reeawith discontin ing Shie ~ et very disappointed and do n g in July 1989. Further, we were made aware of this after budg a royal and feel we are due morbenefit atoward Wotherl insurance pp employees using eesl that warrants further consideration. enough 125 employ ) (approximately aid benefit for the last 10 years and we This has been a County-p , We are told that this lthen fear for what will be taken next. standardize County and SchaoTebeiveltheirlpayhancreases onsJuly 1~ the County employees shoul ees. the same as the School emP °y ear before, ested that the Employee Advisory Committee app It is requ 23 1989, and make the Board of Supervisors at their meetand pos t ve manner. It is our wishes known to them in a iven~an explanation of why this is further requested that we be g dis ali 'ed under Section 89. _ -~ - ------- ~, 1 e 5 e C°J~ r e~c~ ~° ~} °~e rave ~rP 4~y~ e C,~o `1°~,~ A d ~yar ~ ~,b oYee a ~1~ e ey°e 'y~~ d a t~`ar.' ~' , '~ 5 e y _; F,m~'~er ~~' ex4~ lea a~~ e 5 ~ CY' . ~_' 2~ ' ~~ 5~e~ yt~e ~° a'~ e,'pyrX°v ~,~ i ae4 ~~wa a~,°~e p',~Jt ^P ~° pe4 TO: EMPLOYEES ADVISORY COMMITTEE ut the $42 County ees who have. opted to P are We, the undersigned employ the benefit enefit toward insurance oth ar reeawith discontinuing Shie ud et b ointed and do not q very disapp we were made aware of this after q in July 1989. Further, We feel there are approval and feel wesine athisorbenefitmatoward °tconsideratione enough employees u to ees) that warrants further ears and we approximately 125 emp Y This has been a County-paid benefit for the last 1 Y what will be taken next! We are told that this 1 then fear for and School benefits. If that is the case, standardize County a increases on July 1- the County employees should o eeslve their p Y the same as the School emp Y ear before ested that the Employee Advisory Committee aPP and make It is requ ervisors at their meeting on May 23, 1989, 't've manner. It is the Board of Sup our wishes ke ted that we further requ disqualified under Section in a firm and pose i this is be given an explanation of whY 89. _!'~y~ --------------- ,~ ay F,m'~ olo~ o~,e ~.2 C°v ~~iP1 ~~. ~~ ~° ~~ ~ ~ naa er ~,~e ~ .i~,e Ce'~ a,~.~- 9yg p,C ~ ~ i.Ly~~ C ~y9~$ out c A'~~e~i5r ~°~,~e E ee~ ~ B1uP ~iog 5igt' ~, ~~'~ mat' o~ , . X41 ~ trams exQ~ leap ~~eo~P Cray 2~ ' ~~re 9 ed L ~eP ' a.'~ e ~X°~~ ~ _ ~ ~ ,~,o vy tee Co~~ ,~~ `a yee r~, ~~ i SQr~ a~~~ ~a ~o e~,o. Aa, t de ~°~w e4a~~~ ~]°J ~5e .. 5 ~ TO: EMPLOYEES ADVISORY COMMITTEE ut the $42 County to ees who have opted to p are We, the undersigned emP Y the benefit it toward insurance other teawith discontinui 9 Shiel , et benef very disappointed and do not agre 1989. Further, we were manformation f We feel there are in July approval and feel we are due more i em loyees using this benefit toward other insuranc enough P to ees) that warrants further conearsrandowe approximately 125 emp Y This has been a County-paid benefit for the last 1 Y ~ We are told that this 1 then fear for what will and School benefits. If that is the case, standardize County a increases on July 1. the County employees should receive their p Y to ees. the same as the School emP Y Committee appear before ested that the Employee Advisory 1989, and make It is requ ervisors at their meeting on May 23- It is the Board of Sup ositive manner• this is our wishes know d thath we be givenmannexPlanation of whY further requeste disqua~lifie ~pnder Section 89. _ ~--- ~.~ ~ _~C~, C -- ~'~~~~_- ----------------------- ld Beney s 4a o ee in CoantY eld EmPl Y ees o. $42 e Srl t° the emQlo Gone s vtiliZ C~oss~Bl~ onoern all tbos ~ have tre loYees Blae oar ° After h to si9rp,C ~ in 2Cs Etret trap ressl e9 si9n, and Wls °f tY'egq. 0 in exP leas e°ted airman s ~~~ ted , ee ~ P aff Cr an If In orY Co men t Wh I,e ~ ~'lr po~~ at ~ r ~-h dv is d art d to Y°ur se forty e art~`ent. Plea iff ~ s D ~Y,e~ TO: EMPLOYEES ADVISORY COMMITTEE We, the undersigned eanceyotherh than B1ueeCross/B1 eh Shield ~uare benefit toward lnsur very disappointed and do not agree with discontinuing the benefit in July 1989. Further, we were made aware of Wel feelttheredare approval and feel we are due more information. enough employees emllo ees) that warrant ofurther considerations (approximately 125 p Y This has been a Counts takenbnext! t Wer arse told that this ais to fear for what wlll b standardize County and ould receive theirIpayhincreases on July In the County employees sh the same as the School employees. It is requested that the Employee Advisory Committee appear before the Board of Supervisohemtin a fmnntand pos flue ~manner.an Itais our wishes known to t further requested that we be given an explanatlon of why this is disqual' ied f}~der Section 89. /- ~r~~ .,°' ~ / L~=~~--- `~~e~f''71__ _ ~ - ~----------- ----------------------- 1.1,~1.~9A~,F'~--------- -~b=z--~--;~-- `~ TO: EMPLOYEES ADVISORY COMMITTEE We, the undersigned employees who have opted to put the $42 County benefit toward insurance other than Blue Cross/Blue Shield, are very disappointed and do not agree with discontinuing the benefit in July 1989. Further, we were made aware of this after budget approval and feel we are due more information. We feel there are enough employees using this benefit toward other insurance (approximately 125 employees) that warrants further consideration. This has been a County-paid benefit for the last 10 years and we fear for what will be taken next! We are told that this is to standardize County and School benefits. If that is the case, then the County employees should receive their pay increases on July 1, the same as the School employees. It is requested that the Employee Advisory Committee appear before the Board of Supervisors at their meeting on May 23, 1989, an Itais our wishes known to them in a firm and positive manner. further requested that we be given an explanation of why this is disqualified under Section 89. ------------------------------ TO: EMPLOYEES ADVISORY COMMITTEE We, the undersigned employees who have opted to put the $42 County benefit toward insurance other than Blue Cross/Blue Shield, are very disappointed and do not agree with discontinuing the benefit in July 1989. Further, we were made aware of this after budget approval and feel we are due more information. We feel there are enough employees using this benefit toward other insurance (approximately 125 employees) that warrants further consideration. This has been a County-paid benefit for the last 10 years and we fear for what will be taken next! We are told that this is to standardize County and School benefits. If that is the case, then the County employees should receive their pay increases on July 1, the same as the School employees.. It is requested that the Employee Advisory Committee appear before the Board of Supervisors at their meeting on May 23, 1989, and make our wishes known to them in a firm and positive manner. It is further requested that we be given an explanation of why this is disqualified under Section 89. ------------------------------ ----------------------------- t,~~ e~,d ~,o ,L,~,o. o '~`~ it 0.ti G~,e dry Ge{~5ay ~° ~e SAC , ~ g~- Goy ,°et, y`~ ~c,'~` $ q . 2yo 055 ~ ovt A~' ~y o~ ~~l O'r-y~~e ct o°~ ~y~~ .a a~a parr 5 e5 ~~" e`'~'yge eG~,e C,~,a bra ~-°~ ~ra° e'~~t lea a~.~-° J5' ~ ~r ~~ met 'y'n ee ~ ate yp~ ~ a 20 ~ ~ 5~ea y~r,'~ fro ee 1' o ete Co~ep'° ,°o ~' ~ . v~ ot~ ate at8 ~~eo ZA ~ i ae4~ot oe4at _, of .. 5e . ~ 5 T0: EMPLOYEES ADVISORY COMMITTEE We, the undersigned employees who have opted to put the $42 County benefit toward insurance other than Blue Cross/Blue Shield, are very disappointed and do not agree with discontinuing the benefit in July 1989. Further,.we were made aware of this after budget approval and feel we are due more information: We feel there are enough employees using this benefit toward other insurance (approximately 125 employees) that warrants further consideration. This has been a County-paid benefit for the last 10 years and we fear for what will be taken next! We are told that this is to standardize County and ouldorebeive1theirlpayhincreases onsJulyhln the County employees sh the same as the School employees. It is requested that the Employee Advisory Committee appear before the Board of Supervisors at their meeting on May 23, 1989, and make our wishes known to them be a ivenman nexplanation of why this is further requested that g disqualified under Section 89. _ ~~ . ~ ~I /,/ ~ _ ~_ ~ ~.SL~s ~.. .~` ~-~ ~_r~=.~~~.~---------------- f _~~ ~- ~~ ~~L - ------------ - , ~ - -`/~ ~ ~ ,7~ , _ ~ o~~~ ~aa ~° ~Y`o~ea ra~ rage u ye ~`~ . o y A,t CJe g`~ oe{r a~ ~o ye ~Y,C ~ ~,o, ~ ~ 91 car ~e'~. ~r ~cY' q , ~yti G~og~ oJt A a v~y o~ ~~~$ O~-~" ~e rg ~ r ' an 4`a'r 5 eg g1 y5i ~yg ed ay'~ 0.r, ~~41e~ ~,~,ar r e~4{4~-ee a X~~~ ~ ~ ~~ -1'r 2~ ~ ~~b y~ed y ~ ~`~° ee S'yr o ~ a e ~~;rot~atiad~~,e~~ ~ { ~ ~.d~ y de4k o~~?,e4a TO: EMPLOYEES ADVISORY COMMITTEE We, the undersigned employees who have opted to put the $42 County benefit toward insurance other than Blue Cross/Blue Shield, are very disappointed and do not agree with discontinuing the benefit in July 1989. Further, we were made aware of this after budget approval and feel we are due more information. We feel there are enough employees using this benefit toward other insurance (approximately 125 employees) that warrants further consideration. This has been a County-paid benefit for the last 10 years and we fear for what will be taken next! We are told that this is to standardize County and School benefits. If that is the case, then the County employees should receive their pay increases on July 1, the same as the School employees. It is requested that the Employee Advisory Committee appear before the Board of Supervisors at their meeting on May 23, 1989, and make our wishes known to them in a firm and positive manner. It is further requested that we be given an explanation of why this is disqualified under Section 89. -~ ne ~ ~'' ~,,,.._-- ala Be ee~ In ~~,...~.. Count iela e EmPl ioYee e So ~ $ ~~, e Sr to tr se emp e aon ti1iZ1~' oss~Blu ou~e~n ail tho g~ ha i~ tY,e ee5 Ot~,~ue Cr ouz e A~tet sr to e Ep,C ~ EmP eC to an ~ ~ e s s ~- e s g ea ana man o 5 ~ ' $ a . ~,~ ' ~'C.~ d 1~ Qe~ 4~~e ~a~~ous ~ bra ~h0.r ~ lit r ~ ~° m ~'t ~o Le ~ ~~~ p I a~ ~r S Av ygo opa~t,a~a' t me~'i TO: EMPLOYEES ADVISORY COMMITTEE We, the undersigned employe~h rh than B1ueeCross/Blueh Shield ware benefit toward insurance o very disappointed and do not agee ~ det aw rec of this gafterbbudget in July 1989. Further, we we _ approval and feel we are dthisorbenefit atoward Wotherl insurance enough employees using (approximately 125 employees) that warrants further conesadsrandowe This has been a .ii be Pakenbnext! t Wer aree t ld that this is to fear for what wi standardize County and Schoolebeive1theirlpayhincreases onsJuly In the County employees should r the same as the School employees. ested that the Employee Advisory Committee appear before It is requ g y 1989 and make the Board of Supervisors at their meetin ° ositive manner. It is our wishes known to them in a iven °an nexplanation of why this is further requested that we be g disqualified under Section 89. -- ~-v-=~~~-------- J ,4 aid Berms ~~41 10~ o~,e ~° ~ ° Jtti~ie~,d ~° ~ ode ~a e a ,~,e ~ ~~ g1`~e ~~ o~~e~~ a1 ~o e1 EAC ~ i~ ii.y2 C~ ° 95 ~ °~,t c pf-~ ~ 15Y' f. tY'e g q . ee a O g1`~e ~ i~9 ~ i~~' a a°a may' ° 5 .~-~ 1 gco4~"°,~ trams e~4~ lea5 ~~ec~e cY,a~~ar, ~~ ' ptre ,red ~'~ee ,° a'~ ~1 ,~°v' a~ e'r ,.~a i ~e4 „rwa ~~Yt T0: EMPLOYEES ADVISORY COMMITTEE We, the undersigned employees who have opted to put the $42 County benefit toward .insurance other than Blue Cross/Blue Shield, are very disappointed and do not agree with discontinuing the benefit in July 1989. Further, we were made aware of this after budget approval and feel we are due more information. We feel there are enough employees. .using this benefit toward other insurance (approximately 125 employees) that warrants further consideration. This has been a County-paid benefit for the last 10 years and we fear for what will be taken next! We are told that this i then standardize CoioteesnshouldorebeiveltheirIpayhincreases onsJuly 1, the County emp y the same as the School employees. It is requested that the Employee Advisory Committee appear before the Board of Supervisors at their meeting on May 23, 1989, and make our wishes known to them in a firm and positive manner. It is further requested that we be given an explanation of why this is dis ala~fied un~e Section 89.. -~~-~.r y-- - 4aya ~re5e~ ras e~ ,~ti. y p~~~~ye~a tt'~ ~-," p~~y ~.PC ~ ~~, cue ~ o~Geet ~. ~ ~c~'e g °' y~,~ 55 ~ ov't oa a~. 5 ,~yti Gt° ~ ~, ~~' •a a yt~ ate O'~:~y~e g~y~e gvG,~,e Cra Xr S ~ e 9 ~e ~ 4,'ote~~a~, ee4t4~-te a~ pJ `a~ ~~ ~~` e y~ e ~ vy o O'~~ ~e~ y'o~ ~Y' yee ~O ~ te9 o~ep~' ,~o p'L' e C ~ e y~~ t~ ~~, ata t~~ Z~a~ y`'oae4r~o{ ~e4a T0: EMPLOYEES ADVISORY COMMITTEE We, the undersigned eapceyotherh th n B1peeCross/Blush Shield~uare benefit toward insur very disappointed and do not agree with discontinuing the benef t in July 1989. Further, duewmoreminform t on f Wel feelttheredare approval and feel we are enough employees using eesl that warrant ofurdther considerations (approximately 125 employ ) This has been a County-paid benefit for the last 10 years and we fear for what will be to ool benelfitss If that ishthe tcase,l then standardize County and Sch increases on July 1, the County employees should receive their pay the same as the School employees. It is requested that the Employee Advisory Committee appear before the Board of Supervisors atlnhai firmtand pos t ve ~manner.an Itais our wishes known to them further requested that we be given an explanation of why this is disqualified under Section 89. Yaia Bets 1°`~eee 5 1 0 ~ AZ Gov S Lela ~ ~ o~ E eta to a re e ~•1~-21~ os ~B,'~e r~o~'ce~~ all o ~i9P C ~ 1 ~ v~l e CC ov.x A~~et s~ ~ e gA ~mploY gran $1v ~ ess ire 519 e' a~a an o ~ ~ ~ s q . d ~ Tp : parer n eXP leas ~~ect CY,al ~ar~ ~eCes om i~t who 4e Ly ~o~~ a~ ~r -~' Z~ ~" go~C `~ C Mme d t~ I' ~ . ~ Aa`~ r de4 ~~war ar~~ T0: EMPLOYEES ADVISORY COMMITTEE t the $42 County We, the undersigned employees who have opted to pu benefit toward insurance other than Blue Cross/Blue Shield, are very disappointed and do not agree with discontinuing the benefit in July 1989. Further, wuewmoremanformation f Wel feelttheredare approval and feel we are d enough employees using this benefit toward other insurance (approximately 125 employees) enefitafor the last l0oyeaasrandowe This has been a County paid b fear for what will be take i bene'fitse If that ishthetcase,lthen standardize County and Schoo a increases on July 1, the County employees should r eesive their p y the same as the School employ It is requested that the Employee Advisory Committee appear before the Board of Supervisors at their meeting on May 23, 1989, and make our wishes known to them in a ivenman nexp anation of why this is ested that we be g further requ dis alified/~^under Section 89. A-61489-4 ACTION NO. ITEM NO . `~ .~ AT A REGULAR MEET HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTYI ADMINISTRATIOON CENTER COUNTY, VIRGINIA, MEETING DATE: June 14, 1989 AGENDA ITEM: Approval of Consent Special Order Dixie Cavern Landfill COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMM~,E/N~TS C~ BACKGROUND' For approximately one year the Cto elim nate the unpermitted the State Water Control Board ("SWCB") discharge to state waters from the Dixie Caverns Landfill Since November 1988 the County has been negotiating a Consent Special Order ( "CSO" )~ with the SWCB rod r ate CSO1 has been tdevised andta Management ( DWM ). An app p plan has been developed to eliminate unpermitted discharge from the site. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: While the County has been proceeding to complete the removal action under a joint agreement with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency ("EPA") to clean up certain disposal areas the County and the adjacent to the old Dixie Caverns landfill site, SWCB have been working together to address the escape of leachate from the site. To control this discharge the S CB ty This pond structed a leachate holding pond as directed by helps control the discharge induced by rainwater seepage in the landfill area. Although this problem is limited to surface runoff and impacts a small stream at the site, a long term solution is necessary. Under the CSO the County will develop a plan to stop the production and discharge of leachate from the royal. This plan will be reviewed by SWCB and DWM for their app may also be subject to the jurisdiction of EPA. ALTERNATIVES AND IMPACTS: The fiscal impact of developing a plan to satisfy the CSO is $6000.00 for outsidllebe handl d by existing staffnin~thetEng ineere bulk of the work wi in Department. Funding for this expense can be allocated from g 1 roved the Dixie Caverns Account. Th since the fulll extenttof the work plan are unknown at this time, required awaits regulatory approval. This work shall be brought back to the Board for a future appropriation. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Board authorize the County Administrator to exec ete r ductione ands discharged of leachate from and DWM to address th p the old Dixie Caverns landfill. Respectfully submitted, ~~. , Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney Action Motion by Lee Garrett/ Garrett Approved (x) Johnson Denied ( ) Steven A. McGraw McGraw Received ( ) Nickens Referred Robers to cc: File Paul Mahoney, County Attorney John Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance Reta Busher, Director, Management & Budget ~~~~ No Yes Abs x x x x x A-61489-5 ACTION # ITEM NUMBER ~ .. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: June 14, 1989 AGENDA ITEM: Appropriation of Funds for Virginia Amateur Sports, Inc. r COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR' S COMMENTS : ~ ~ ~ v,y ` / llPP'' „ ~ ~.`"'_ ~~ ~1 BACKGROUND: Virginia Amateur Sports, Inc., was formed rofit corporation to bring amateur athletes of non-p to compete in the across Virginia to the Valley Games. in 1989 as a all ages f rom Virginia State The State Games will be new to Virginia, but they are well State Games were established in a national context. In In 1989, nine additional held in 31 states across the country. states will host the state games fo.r the first time, bringing the total number of states participating to 40. Patterned after the Olympics, the State Games is a multisport competition designated to promote amateur sports. This competition is viewed by the Olympic Committee as the first rung on the Olympic ladder. The State Games of Virginia are proposed to begin in the summer of 1990 with the full sanction of the Olympic Committee and the Governor. They expect 3,000+ participants competing in ten sports. The anticipated ann orlBalales has i cludeda$175t000 Spnrthe 500 is eing Inc., is $500,000. Govern State budget for the State Games. An additional $8~- The requested from theme local willrbeegenerated eth ough majorlsponsors, balance of the revenue entry fees, merchandise sales and concession sales. -^`. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Virginia Amateur Sports, Inc., is requesting a per capita, pro rata share of funding from the local Valley governments to support their effort to b The totalalocalashare requested eis to the Roanoke Valley. is bein asked to contribute $87,500 of which Roanoke County g $29, 400. Attached for theoro°.ect.' s Ardetailedsbudgettcan be information regarding this J provided by staff upon request. ALTERNATIVES AND IMPACTS: Alternative 1. Reapp V prinia Amate00 Sport sheIn~198Th9s Board Contingency to fund g would leave a balance in the Board Contingency account for next fiscal year of $25,000. Alternative 2. Reappropriate $25,000 from the FY 1989-90 Capital Fund previously to be used for an unnamed Economic Development project. ThisfOOUnextefiscalbyearcofl$75h000conomic development project account Alternative 3. Deny the request for funding by the Virginia Amateur Sports, Inc. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends alternative one. 2-Q-~~^ ~' Elmer C. Hodge Reta R. Busher County Administrator Director of Management and Budget +' ACTION VOTE Approved (x) Motion by. Bob L. Johnson/ Steven No YeX Abs Denied ( ) A. McGraw to approve Alter- Johnson x Received ( ) native 1 McGraw x Referred Nickens A stain To Robers x cc: File Reta Busher, Director, Management & Budget Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance Steve Carpenter, Director, Parks & Recreation John Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator FO .i - VIRGINIA AMATEUR SPORTS, INC. BOX 556 • VINTON, VIRGINIA 24179 • 703-343-0987 February 2, 1989 Mr. Elmer C. Hodge Administrator for the County of Roanoke 3738 Brambleton Avenue, S.W. Roanoke, Virginia 24018 Dear Mr. Hodge: Virginia Amateur Sports has been formed to bring amateur athletes from across Vir ha 1 3 000 amateur athl tes tomcompeteoin Valley. We expect more t ~ ursue their quest for a these Olympic sanctioned games, is tTeam P place on the United States Olymp Virginia Amateur Sports is a statewide nandp office linlthe corporation, with its principal leadership Roanoke Valley. The Governor's budget now beeU~eStortslofl$1751000SOOtfor includes funding to Virginia Amat P the 1990 Virginia State Games in the Roanoke Valley. Bringing major Olympic On Sports, event t Games in 3, 000 ,a 1 re Tire somee additiona 1 fun son in ten sports wil qu behalf of the Board of Directors of Virginia Aorting I write to ask you to help bring this major sp o the Valley by including funds for the Virginia State your next budget in the amount of This req~.aest represents a per capita, pro rata .share among valley governments of $87,500.00. This small investment will, we believe, return a handsome economic benefit to the Valley. We will be happy to provide details of the economic impact we anticipate. I will be happy to meet with you or your advisors, as will our secretary, H. Bern Ewert, and other members of the board. With best regards, I am Sincerely yours, - VIRGINIA AMATEUR SPORTS Cw~ Kenne King, r. Board Chairman VIRGINIA STATE GAMES. PO .i - VIRGINIA AMATEUR SPORTS, INC. BOX 556 • VINTON, VIRGINIA 24179 • 703-343-0987 x,11 :.~ VIRGINIA AMATEUR SPORTS INC. Amateur athletes of all ages deserve the Pe t athletes participate, develop and compete. Yet many g in our community, in Virginia and across our country have few opportunities to compete and often their efforts go unrecognized publicly. Today we hear more about the trouble our gout es ana a warsl a ademiclfailures~and the like enage pregnanci g g Virginia Amateur Sports, Inc., is a non-profit organization chartered in 1989 to promote the development of amateur athletes in our state. Virginia Amateur Sports wants to see our young people have the opportunity to compete and be honored for the many good things they do and can accomplish. Virginia Amateur Sports operates with four primary goals: 1, to sponsor, develop, promote and stage the State Games of Virginia with the objective of making the Virginia State Games the best in the nation; 2, to assist in the dev the State f Virginia on of amateur sports and activities in 3, to attract other major amateur athletic events, such as national sports championships, pre-Olympic qualifying events, and major amateur exhibitions to Virginia; and 4, to develop and promote anti-drug programs and steriod education for athletes of all ages within the State of Virginia. THE STATE GAMES Seven out of every ten Virginians watch, read ulation sports every day and nearly 97~ of our pop participates in an athletic event at least once a month. So it comes as no surprise that the State Games will touch a V I R G I N I A STATE GAMES... -~" w major portion of the population of Virginia. There will soon be a new tradition in Virginia which will-unite people from every region of our state. The State Games of Virginia will become a reality in 1990 and, with the experience of other states as a guide, will become within two years Virginia's biggest and most visible amateur sporting event, generating active participation by amateur athletes and enthusiastic spectators alike. The State Games will be new to our state, but they are well established in a national context. The tradition began in 1978 with New York's Empire State Games. In 1988, State Games were held in 31 states across the country. In 1989 nine additional states will host the state games for the first time, bringing the total number of states participating in State Games to 40. Patterned after the Olympics, State Games is a multisports competition designated to promote amateur sports. It provides aspiring athletes of all ages and skill levels the opportunity to experience the thrills of formal competition. Viewed by the Olympic Committee as the first rung on the Olympic ladder, State Games is an early training ground for future United States Olympians. The State Games of Virginia will begin in the summer of 1990 with the full sanction of the Olympic Committee and the Governor of our fine state. Following a Torch run across the state and an opening ceremonies extravaganza complete with a march of 3,000+ athletes who will compete in fifteen sports. All winners will receive gold, silver and bronze metals to commemorate their find achievements. In addition to the athletes and spectators, approximately 1,000 volunteers will take part in making the States Games possible. Hopefully, 4 the State Games in Virginia will be off to a running start. We expect 3,000+ participants in 1990, 6,500 in 1991, 7,500 in 1992 and over 10,000 by 1993. FINANCIAL BENEFITS ~" Competition to host major sporting events in the last four years has become unbelievable. The potential for financial reward is immense. According to Sport. Inc. there was 47 billion dollars spent on sports in 1986 and that figure is on the rise. As the money associates with all kinds of sports increases, more regions of the country are t' to brin those dollars to their communities. compe ing g The United States dollar events. In 1982, that one event turned Indianapolis has hosted Olympic Festival is one of the Indianapolis hosted the festival the whole city around. Since more than 100 sports events, big and 1982 7..~ -S including the 1988 Olympic Trials in five sports and has become the home to the Athletic Congress, the Amateur Athletic Union, the National Track and. Field Hall of Fame and the United States Gymnastic Federation. In 1986 North Carolina Amateur Sports stated the f first North Carolina State Games. The following year North Carolina hosted its first United States olympic festival. The '87 Festival broke attendance records in 26 of the 34 sports and turned a 1.5 million dollar profit and an estimated 35 million dollar impact on the area. North Carolina reaped the rewards by hosting ten top amateur contests in 1988, including U.S./Cuba Volleyball and the Canoeing and Kayaking National Championships. Ken Smith, Executive Director of North Carolina Amateur Sports had this to say, "The Festival gave us the track record to go after other sports which has helped turned North Carolina into a sports festival state." Both North Carolina and Indianapolis have growing roles in the state Games. The Indianapolis Sports Corporation has 25 full-time staffers, who devote 60^ of their time to the White River State Games and had 21,000 participants in 1988. MAJOR SPON3OR8 Virginia Amateur Sports, Inc., is off to a great start. Anticipated annual budget to provide the State Games and the other goals set by the organization is approximately $500,000.00 annually. Governor Baliles has included Virginia Amateur Sports, Inc., in his just-released 1989-90 budget, with financial support in the sum of $175,000.00. An additional $87,000.00 is being sought from the governments of the Roanoke Valley. The rest of the money will come from: a. major sponsors; b. gold, silver and bronze donors; and c. from athlete participation fees. Virginia Amateur Sports intends to draw upon initial government and corporate support for the 1990 State Games. As a statewide event, the State Games will be presented in Roanoke Valley, Virginia and will offer major sponsors and our local governments the opportunity to enhance our image statewide through all planned public relations and advertising. The financial impact upon the Roanoke Valley for 1990 is shown on the following page: "~' For the Virginia State Games economic impact projections we .,i~J be using Lawenthol .and Horwath projection figures because ~!,~y are the statistical data that the Roanoke valley is the m~~.-t familiar with because of their involvement with the Civic Center and Metro Tournament planning. Using 3200 athletes- as an expected number, and a ratio of athletes to family visitors and coaches to be 1:1 along with a sampling error of 600 for friends, relatives and "pure spectators" (who are not involved in the games at all). Add an additional 1000 volunteer workers and the total becomes approximately 8000 people who will either be participating, working or attending the games. We will break out the 8000 individuals as follows: 1, 3200 800 athletes of which will be considered dam athletes. (A day athlete is o ne who lives within a 50 mile radius of Roan oke.) 2. 3200 family visitors and coaches 800 being day visitors 3. 1000 voluntee r workers 500 being day workers 4, 600 friends, relatives and pure spectators 500 being day spectators 2600 - Day People Involved ' 5400 -Overnight People Involved VIRGINIA STATE GARBS BCONOIiIC IMPACT PROJECTION FOR THB 1990 STATE GARBS Attendance for Average Number Day Only Involvement a amending/Day a of Days = Financial Impact 2600 $10 3.5 $91.000.00 4,500.00 Direct taa add on of 5~ Attendance for Overnight Involve 5400 Direct taa add on INDIRECT SPENDING 2600 5400 Average Number Went a Spending/Day a of Days = Financial Impact $100 1 $540,000.00 of 5~ 27, 000.00 ADDITION $18.52 $ 48,152.00 $55.56 $300.024.00 TOTAL $1,010,676.00 The Virginia State Games will recognize a $1,010,676.00 Economic Impact for the Roanoke Valley by hosting the 1990 Virginia State Gamesl s VIRGINIA AMATEUR SPORTS BOARD OF DIRECTORS February 1, 1989 Steven J. Danish, Ph.D. 808 W. Franklin St. Richmond, VA 23284 Mailing: P.O. Box 2018 Richmond, VA 23284-2018 PHONE: 804-367-8089 Douglas J.. Fonder 3439 Halevan Road, SW. Roanoke, VA 24018 Mailing: P.O. Box 556 Vinton, VA 24179 PHONE: 703-343-7822 H. Bern Ewert 101 S. Jefferson St. 6th Floor Roanoke, VA 24011 PHONE: 703-342-4222 Harry C. Nickens 4179 Toddsbury Drive Vinton, VA 24179 Mailing: p.O. Box 14065 Roanoke, VA 24038 PHONE: 703-982-7315 Jerry Spruell, Exec. Dir. Roanoke Chapter, American Red Cross 352 Church Avenue, SW. Roanoke, VA 24016 PHONE: 703-985-3535 James M. Turner 2405 Wycliffe Avenue, SW. Roanoke, VA 24014 Mailing: P.O. Box 1689 Salem, VA 24153 PHONE: 703-389-5471 Renneth C. Ring, Jr. 400 Professional Arts Building 30 Franklin Rd, SW. Roanoke, VA 24011 Mailing: P.O. Box 1784 Roanoke, VA 24008 PHONE: 703-985-0736 Facsimile: 984-0742 Dr. Elizabeth Lee, Principal Patrick Henry High School (H) 703-774-1009 2102 Grandin Road, SW. Roanoke, VA 24015 PHONE: 703-981-2255 Annette G. Mariano, CPA 500 Professional Arts Building 30 Franklin Road, SW Roanoke, VA 24011 PHONE: 703-342-8005 -~ F ~ a;y~ ~~,~~ COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA ~'C ~ < ~~ ~~ a HOUSE OF DELEGATES ?~i;~ ~,~ '.'+*><.n•!' ~'y RICHMOND COM MIT Tk£f G. RICHAR C+CRANWELL _ nNnNCL v_,I,i~. ~.~ .. PO. BOx 459 COVHfS 7r ~U' I VIN TON VIPOINIA 241]9 COUNTIES, r+I,f '~ r•UI` r .:NS MILITIA ANA f`r,l t~'L FOURTEENTH DISTRICT March 13, 1989 Douglas J. Fonder, Executive Director Virginia Amateur Sports Shenandoah Building, Suite 412 303 First Street, S. W. Roanoke, Va -24011 Dear Doug: This letter is to confirm that the 1989 Governor's Budget was approved. Included in the Governor's Budget was the $175,000 to Virginia Amateur Sports for establishment of the Virginia State Games. These funds shall be matched by local or private sources, either in cash or in kind, in amounts at least equal to the appropriation and which are deemed to be acceptable to the Department of Conservation and Historic Resources. For your files I have enclosed copy of Section 76 of Item 486 of the Governor's Budget. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely C. Richard Cranwell cfw Enclosure ~~ - (~, AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUN1989DMINISTRATION CENTER ON WEDNESDAY, JUNE 14, RESOLUTION 61489-6 APPROVING SPECIFIC CAPITAL EXPENDITURES FOR AN FAR PART 150 NOISE STUDY PRMMISSIONBYUPONECERTAINKTERMSGAND CONDIT ONST CO WHEREAS, Section 17.(b) of the contract between the City of Roanoke, Roanoke County, and the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission provides that the Commission shall prepare and submit for approval any proposed capital expenditure exceeding $100,000 to benefit five or more future accounting periods; and WHEREAS, by report dated March 28, 1989, a copy of which is on file in the Office of the City Clerk, the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission has submitted a request that the County approve capital expenditures by the Commission for an FAR Part 150 Noise Study Project in a total estimated amount of $180,000. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that the County hereby approves the capital expenditure by the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission of approximately $180,000 in connection with the Roanoke Regional Airport FAR Part 150 Noise Study Project, and the County Administrator is authorized to execute such documents and take such actions as may be necessary to accomplish the purposes and intent of this Resolution, on behalf of the County, in form approved by the County Attorney. On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor Robers and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES• Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAY5: None A COPY TESTE: Clerk Mary H. Al n, Deruty Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Finance Diane Hyatt, Director, Paul Mahoney, County Attorney Roanoke Regional Airport Commission ACTION # ITEM NUMBER "' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THEOANOKE OCOUNTYEADMINISTRATIONNCENTER COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE R MEETING DATE: June 14, 1989 AGENDA ITEM: Approval of Noise Study Airport COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENT ~~~~ ~ ~ for Roanoke Regional BACKGROUND: The contract between the County of Roanoke, City of Roanoke requires that any capital expendi- and the Airport Commission, Tonal Airport be ture in excess Board0ofOS0upe~visorsRofnRoanoke County and the approved by the Council of the City of Roanoke. SUMMARY OF INFORMATIONS Tonal on March 15, 1989, the Roanoke Reg At their meeting o and execution of Part Airport Commission authorized th.. filing 150 Noise Study grant documents on behalf of the Commissio tedta the Federal Aviation Adminisca~ital•expendituresofo$180~000 to resolution approving the conduct this study. The Federal Government is expected to reim- burse the Commission for 80 percent of the cost of the noise study. FISCAL IMPACT: The Contract between the County and the Regional Airport will pay a percentage of any Commission states that the Count the airport. At this time it is net operating loss incurred by such loss, therefore this not anticipated that there will additional cash outlay from the study should not require any County. _~ ~~ STAFF RECOMMENDATION: roving the attached resolution Staf f recommo~ d Commission to proceed with the Part 150 authorizing the Airp Noise Study. X'iuxrrc~ , ~ ~ - Diane D. Hyatt 0 t r of Finance ~ir-~ /~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator D1rec o ------------------- ------- -------------------------- VOTE ------------- ACTION No Yes Abs ,Approved ( ) Motion by: Garrett Denied ( ) Johnson Received ( ) McGraw Referred Nickens To _ Robers ," ULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF 5UTYRADMINISTRATOR CENTER NTY, AT A REG VIRGINIA, HELD AON WEDNESDAOKEJUNE 14, 1989 RESOLUTION APPROVING SPECI iJIDY PROJECT E BYE THE U ROANOKE AN FAR PART 150 NOISE ST UPON CERTAIN TERMS AND REGIONAL AIRPORT COMMISSION, CONDITIONS REAS Section 17.(b) of the contract between the City of WHE Tonal Airport Commis- Roanoke, Roanoke County, and the Roanoke Reg rovides that the Commission shall prepare and submit for slon p 100,000 to a royal any proposed capital expenditure exceeding $ PP benefit five or more future accounting periods; and 1989 , a copy of which is WHEREAS, by report dated March 28, ' e in the Office of the City Clerk, the Roanoke Regional on f it a rove Air ort Commission has submitted a request that the County pP p ital expenditures by the Commission for an FAR Part 150 Noise cap Study Project in a total estimated amount of $180,000. the Board of Supervisors of THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by a roves the Roanoke County, Virginia, that the County hereby pP 1 ex enditure by the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission of capita P 'matel $180,000 in connection with the Roanoke Regional approxi Y Admin- ect, and the County Proj Airport FAR Part 150 Noise Study ator is authorized to execute such documents and take such istr to accomplish the purposes and intent actions as may be necessary this Resolution, on behalf of the County, in form approved by of the County Attorney. O~ POANGp-~` a I~ 9 ~~ Z Z v a 18 E5o 88 SFSQUICEN7ENN~P A Beauti~ulBeginning COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE June 27, 1989 Mr. Jeffrey Cromer Roanoke Valley Regional Landfill p, p. Box 12312 Roanoke, Virginia 24024 BOARD OGA RPERCVIA OAR N WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT RICHARD W ROBERS. VICE-CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT STEVEN A. MCGRAW CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT Dear Mr. Cromer: request for of Action No. A-61489-7Olverelncorporated on Attached is a copy erformed by ervisors approval of payment for work P the Board of Sup Red Hill Site. TonsWednesdayasJunee14by1989. at their meeting h itate to If you need further contact me. information, please do not es Sincerely, ~, H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Mary Board of Supervisors Roanoke County bjh Attachment C~nixn~t~ o~ ~o~noke P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 2 4018-07 9 8 (703) 772-2004 ACTION # A-61489-7 ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF ORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION OCENTER RVISORS HELD AT THE ROAN MEETING DATE: June 14, 1989 AGENDA ITEM• Request for Approval of Payment for Work Performed by Olver Incorporated on Red Hill Site COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: As part of the landfill siting work performed by Olver Incorporated, Roanoke County requested that the scope of work be expanded to include a sixth potential landfill site. Olver Incorporated proceeded with their investigation of site 44 in the Red Hill section. The total cost of this additional work is $15,794.55. In accordance with Section ardf ande each gPoli ical eSubdivision amust County, the Landfill Bo approve change orders exceeding $10,000• Twe aredrequesting the approved the change orderrovalt ofh Change Order Number 1 for this Board of Supervisors' app additional work. ALTERNATIVES AND IMPACTS: (1) Approve Change Order Number 1 in the amount of $15,794.55 for the additional worketCounteSbygthe Landfill Board amount will be reimbursed to Roanok Y (2) Do not approve Change order Number 1. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of Alternate 1. ~- 1 SUBMITTED BY: ohn R. Hubbard, Administrator Assistant County 't Services & Development APPROVED: ~~~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator Commune y __________________ ------------------------ VOTE ---------------------- ACTION Abs unrr~~ C' lrL~ Approved ~ ) Motion by: ~ arrett Garrett to approve Alter ativ~ Denied ( ) Johnson Received ( ) 1 McGraw Referred Nickens to• Robers cc: File John Hubbard, Assistant County Administra or Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance Reta Busher, Director, Management & Budget No Yes X x x x ~-~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, ON WEDNESDAY, JUNE 14, 1989 RESOLUTION 61489-8 AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF CONTRACT FOR CONSULTANT SERVICES WITH O.D. PAGE, P.E. AND PAYMENT OF PROPORTIONATE CONTRACT COST WHEREAS, the current cable television franchise agreement covering the County of Roanoke and the Town of Vinton will expire; and WHEREAS, the Roanoke Regional Cable Television Committee has determined that the services of a cable television consultant would be beneficial to the localities affected in evaluating the proposed renewal of this franchise by Cox Cable of Roanoke Inc. and in the negotiations for such renewals; and WHEREAS, the Roanoke Regional Cable Television Committee, after compliance with the provisions of Title II of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, applicable to the procurement of professional services, has selected the firm of O. D. Page, P.E. for cable television consultant services in connection with this proposed franchise renewal. BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. The County Administrator is hereby authorized to enter into and execute an agreement with O. D. Page, P.E. for the provision by such firm of consultant services in connection with the proposed cable television franchise renewal, as more par- ticularly set forth in the April 27, 1989, letter of Howard E. Musser, Chairman, Roanoke Regional Cable Television Committee. 2. The County shall pay its proportionate share of $2,947.00 total amount of the contract authorized by this resolution. of the roved 3 , The form of the contract with this firm shall be app by the County Attorney's Office. An emergency is deemed to exist and this resolution shall 4. on its passage. be in full force and effect up gu ervisor On motion of Supervisor McGraw, seconded by P Nickens, and carried by the following recorded vote: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garret AYES: NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: c/ Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File County Attorney Paul Mahoney, Chairman, Roanoke Regional Cable Television Howard E. Musser, Committee ACTION NO. ""~"~ _' ITEM NO. ~~--- EGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD COUNTY RADMINISTRATION CENTER AT A R HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, June 14, 1989 MEETING DATE' Regional Cable Television Committee Consultant AGENDA ITEM' Contract Cost Authoriza 1 COUNTY ADMINISTRp,TOR' ENTS: a0 0 BACKGROUND' rovide cable Roanoke The franchise of Cox urb sdictionsnof Roanoke Counuture. Cox television service in the J ire in the near f City, and the Town of Vinton will exp f Roanoke Inc. has requested a renewal of this franchise, Cable o Roanoke Regional Cable Telev ~ °ices°of a t~ ble television and the this req nt Would be ben f i ialtin analyzing Cox Cable's request. consulta SUMMARY OF INFORMATION' inia law •n in accordance with the provisions of Virg Proceeds g the Proposal Committee of the for obtaining professional services, accounting e Re Tonal Cable Television Coionale engineering~ed the irm Roanok g to provide profess eration under of O.D. Page, P.E. both the current op and legal services in analyzing ro osal submitted by Cox the cablevision franchise and the renewa P rovide necessary nc. The consultant will provide a revised franchise Cable Roanoke I otiation process. document to be submitted to Cox Cable an the neg support to the governmental bodies during 830.00 of which 28, Based upon its The cost of these Beds to pay suP to s$201000 e00 • s of thirty-three Cox Cable has agr onsible for current percentage of cable of Roanokes shall be resp rofessional (33%) percent, the County $2,947.00 of the balance of $8,930.00 for these p services. ALTERNATIVES AND IMPACTS: romising Roanoke Failure to adopt this resolution ris ut imp this important 's ability to have significant inp County franchise renewal decision. --._... ~ ~-g STAFF RECOMMENDATION. County authorize the on the It is recommended that the Board D. page p,E. and the Town of Vinton and to Administrator to as eRoanokecCityact with ~c Fund of the County's same conditions authorize payment from the Board's Congingen share of $2,947.00 for this consultants service. Respectfully submitted, ,., _ Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney Action Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to ____-- Motion by Vote No Yes Abs Garrett Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers 1 MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPEDMINI TRATION AC NT R o ON Y, AT A REGULAR VIRGINIA, HELD AT TyH~TEDNE DAYS, CJ[7NE 14 , 1989 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF CONTRACT FOR CONSULTANT SERVICES WITH O.D. PAGE, P.E. AND PAYMENT OF PROPORTIONATE CONTRACT COST S the current cable television franchise agreement y,7HEREA , ire ; verin the County of Roanoke and the Town of Vinton will exp co g and EgEp,S, the Roanoke Regional Cable Television Committee as WH d that the services of a cable television consultant woul determine the proposed be beneficial to the localities affected in evaluating nd in the renewal of this franchise by Cox Cable of Roanoke Inc. a negotiations for such renewals; and ble Television Committee, WHEREAS, the Roanoke Regional Ca liance with the provisions of Title II of the Code of after comp rocurement of Virginia, 1950, as amended, applicable to the p Pa e, P.E. rofessional services, has selected the firm of O. D. g P le television consultant services in connection with this for cab proposed franchise renewal. IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, BE Virginia, as follows: 1, The County Administrator is hereby authorized to enter D. Page, P.E. for the into and execute an agreement with O• b such firm of consultant services in connection with provision y as more par- the proposed cable television franchise renewal, Howard E• the April 27, 1989, letter of ticularly set forth in sser Chairman, Roanoke Regional Cable Television Committee. Mu The County shall pay its proportionate share of $2,947.0 2. 1 ` ount of the contract authorized by this resolution. of the total am roved 3 , The form of the contract with this firm shall be app by the County Attorney's Office. 4 , An emergency is deemed to exist and this resolution shall be in full force and effect upon its passage. ACTION # ITEM NUMBER__~„~c -~- f AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: June 14, 1989 AGENDA ITEM: Vacation of a portion of a 25 foot waterline, ingress and egress easement and a portion of a 15 foot public utility easement, recorded in Plat Book 10, Page 41, Section 1, Fairway Forest Estates. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~~~-,~~ BACKGROUND: F. F. E. Development Corporation, the developer of Section 1 and 2, Fairway Forest Estates, has requested the vacation of a portion of a 25 foot waterline, ingress and egress easement and a portion of a 15 foot public utility easement, recorded in Plat Book 10, Page 41, Section 1, Fairway Forest Estates. The vacation is necessary to abolish any encumbrance on the proposed right-of-way for Section 3, Fairway Forest Estates. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Roanoke County is requesting, prior to final approval of the subdivision's plans, that the described easements (refer to attached Plat), be vacated in accordance with Chapter 11, Title 15.1-482(b), Code of Virginia, 1950, by the attached Ordinance. The Department of Engineering and Utility, as well as the local utility companies, Appalachian Power Co., Roanoke Gas Company, Salem Cable TV and C & P Telephone Company have commented that they will relinquish their right to the described easements upon recordation of Section 3, Fairway Forest Estates. The first reading of the proposed Ordinance is scheduled for June 14, 1989; the Public Hearing and the second reading is scheduled for June 27, 1989. G-i STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The County staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors adopt the proposed Ordinance to vacate the referenced easements and instruct the County Attorney, in the preparation of the Ordinance, clearly state "that the portion of a 25 foot waterline easement, ingress and egress easement and a portion of a 15 foot public utility easement, as described, in the attached Plat, be vacated only on the recordation of the right-of-way for Section 3, Fairway Forest Estates." The boundary line of Lot 47, Block 2, Section 1, Fairway Forest Estates, will be handled administratively under Section 17-23 of the Roanoke County Subdivision Ordinance. SU MITTED BY: A, .~ /'. M~~ Arnold Covey / Development Review/Inspections Director Approved Denied Received Referred to Motion by: ACTION APPROVED: ~,n~yv+/ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator VOTE No Yes Abs Garrett Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers ;;~.,.~ -~~' ®PORTIO CRESS n& EGRESS WATERLINE, EASEMENT. TO BE VACATED S 75'39'52" E 6A-3 W S 88'29'24" 19.25' 80.71' ' I WELL LOT PROPERTY OF 3_4 4_5 N 48'04'30" E N 75'39'52" E 15.39 85.97' ' BOARD OF SUPERVISORS 5_6 g_6A N 10'02'17" W CH. 24,62 OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VA p g, 1109, PG. 560 TOTAL AREA = 1712 S.F. NOTE: "CH" DENOTES CHORD. LOT 47 I BLOCK 2 SECTION No. 1 FI~IRWAY FOREST ESTATES P.B. 10, PG. 41 PROPERTY OF FFE C~EVEIOPMENT CORPORATION EXISTING 15' PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMEN'~ 3 2 e. ~\ R/yy EXISTING 25~INGRESS & WATERLINE, EGRESS EASEMEN~ NEW TRACT "A PROPERTY OF FFE DEVELOPMENTPG RPORATION P,.B. __-~ ® PORTION OF EXISTING 15' / P.U.E. TO BE VACATED N 49.44'29" W 26.56' CH. 1-2 26.39' CH. 2-5A N 10'26'44" W 15,10' 5A-6 N 75'39'52" E 48.00' CH. 6_1 S 12'32'08" E \TOTAL AREA = 487 S.F. ~ tinTF_ "CH" DENOTES CHORD. AC 26FS~. !~~} O,Q PLAT SHOWING VACATION OF pF 25' WATERLINE, INGRESS & EGRESS EASEMENT POR PION & PORTION OF 15' PUBLIC UTILITY EANEMENT SITUATED THROUGH LOT 47, BLOCK 2, SECTION PyTH OFD FAIRWAY FOREST ESTATES (P.B. 10, PG. 41) ~:~`' f.3? PROPERTY OF FA I R`4YAY ~ ~ ~ ~F,~, (s pEST`4~~',s T° ti~o\ Ae Rw ~qti Riw del °Fti VINCENT K. LUMSDEN No. 14286 FFE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION 9 WINDROANOIKESCOUNITY, RVIRGINIARICT SCALE: 1" = 50' DATE: 21 APRIL 1989 LUMSDEN ASSOCIATES, P. C ENGINEERS RoANOKEEY~RCNIA PLANNERS . ~ ~`'. _~ ;l - ~~fs-s G~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON WEDNESDAY, JUNE 14, 1989 ORDINANCE VACATING A PORTION OF A TWENTY-FIVE (25) FOOT WATERLINE AND INGRESS/EGRESS EASEMENT, AND A PORTION OF A FIFTEEN (15) FOOT PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT, RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 10, PAGE 41, SECTION 1, FAIRWAY FOREST ESTATES Whereas, F.F.E. Development Corporation, the developer of Sections 1 and 2, Fairway Forest Estates has requested the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia to vacate a portion of a twenty-five (25) foot waterline and ingress/egress easement and a portion of a fifteen (15) foot public utility easement, dedicated to the County by plat found in Plat Book 10, page 41, Section 1, Fairway Forest Estates in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia; and, WHEREAS, Section 15.1-482 (b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, requires that such action be accomplished by the adoption of an ordinance by the governing body; and, WHEREAS, notice has been given as required by Section 15.1- 431 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and a first reading of this ordinance was held on June 14, 1989; and the public hearing and second reading of this ordinance was held on June 27, 1989. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That a portion of a twenty-five (25) foot waterline and ingress/egress easement and a portion of a fifteen (15) foot public utility easement as shown on the attached plat dated 21 April 1989 prepared by Lumsden Associates, P.C., and dedicated to Roanoke G-I County, by plat found in Plat Book 10, at page 41, Section 1, Fairway Forest Estates in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, be, and hereby is, vacated pursuant to Section 15.1-482(b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended; and, 2. That as a condition of the adoption of this ordinance, F.F.E. Development Corporation hereby agrees to pay all costs and expenses required to relocate all utility lines and improvements within these easements; and, 3. That the portion of the twenty-five (25) foot waterline easement and ingress/egress easement and the portion of the fifteen (15) foot public utility easement be vacated only upon the recorda- tion and dedication to the County of the right-of-way for Section 3, Fairway Forest Estates. 4. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. 4. That F.F.E. Development Corporation shall record a certified copy of this ordinance with the Clerk of the Circuit Court and shall pay all fees required to accomplish this trans- action. ACTION # ITEM NUMBER '°°Ca~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: June 14, 1989 AGENDA ITEM: Vacate the southern portion of an unimproved 50 foot right-of-way referred to as "Chelsea Street", recorded in Plat Book 2, Page 170, Section 1, Western Hills Subdivision. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND: The petitioner's, Carlin Nucholls and Marty & Elizabeth Poff who are the adjacent property owners, are requesting the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors, by Ordinance, to vacate the southern portion of Chelsea Street, shown on a previously Platted Subdivision referred to as Section 1, Western Hills, recorded on October 1, 1941. On July 14, 1971, the Board of Supervisors, by order, closed the portion of Chelsea Street located in the Southwoods Subdivision. This request involves the remaining portion of Chelsea Street from it's intersection with Overbrook Drive south to end, approximately 240 feet in length. The petitioners are requesting the vacation in order that they may improve and beautify their respective properties. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Roanoke County is requesting that the described right-of-way, be vacated in accordance with Chapter 11, Title 15.1-482 (b), Code of Virginia, 1050, by the attached Ordinance. The Virginia Dept. of Transportation has no objections to the closing. The Department of Engineering and Utility has no objections to the proposed vacation on the following conditions: ~-a 1. A sewer main presently crosses the existing right-of-way, therefore, Roanoke County must reserve a 20 foot sanitary sewer easement. 2. That a 20 foot waterline easement be reserveThel~easone centerline of the fifty foot right-of-way. for the conditions is the waterline on South Park Circle is a 4 inch dead end line. The requested 20 foot waterline easement would permit Roanoke County to hook the South Park Circle line radedtin theefuturein Overbrook when the system is upg The first reading of the proposed Ordinance is scheduled for June 14, 1989; the Public Hearing and the second reading is scheduled for June 27, 1989. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The County staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors adopt the proposed Ordinance to vacate the referenced right-of-way and instruct the County Attorney, in the preparation of the Ordiaasanita~ rsewereeasementuhaseshownoon theeattached easement an Y map. UBMIT'I'ED BY Arnold Covey Development Review/Ins ections Director APPROVED: ~~ ~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ----------------- -------------------- VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: Denied Received ( ) Referred to ACTION No Yes Abs Garrett Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers ~~`~ OVERBROOK DRIVE T=25 $-84'09 W ~ ~ >~,~~n z ~ ~~~~~ ~ R=25 65 'Q~ ''`' M, ~'~ ~,.~ ARC=39.27 .~ ~ ~ ~x, f~ .ptT `~~ "'~~" ZO' WATER LINE s 7 ~,~ ~` 3 ~ ~k ~ - ~ !~ TO BE ~ A ATE 3 ' M to ,y Z ~ ~EXI3T~N ,3. a . ~~ =8 ~3MT ~~ 20' SAN. SEWER ESMT. ,a. a CD ti N Oil N N- _ _ _ _ 10' EXISTING S_S_ESMT. WESTERN. HILLS SUBt~11~=iSION 2 / 139.16 6 7 VACATED BY B•O.S. I ON 7/ 14 / 71 ----=r c0 i 37 ~I _`~~~ s 144.7 _I M ti (V SOUTHWOOD N I SUBDIVISION 144 SOUTH PARK CLR. TAX MAP N0. 68.17=2 87705-5 4 'r N-87'°44~ W 2 „ , SCALE : 1 ° ~ -- CHELSEA STREET TO BE VACATED Prepared ey: Roanoke County Engineering Department Date ~~--~. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON WEDNESDAY, JUNE 14, 1989 ORDINANCE VACATING THE SOUTHERN PORTION OF AN UNIMPROVED FIFTY (50) FOOT RIGHT-OF-WAY, REFERRED TO AS "CHELSA STREET," RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 2, PAGE 170, SECTION 1, WESTERN HILLS SUBDIVISION Whereas, Carlin Nucholls and Marty and Elizabeth Poff, the petitioners and adjacent property owners, have requested the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia to vacate the southern portion of an unimproved fifty (50) foot right-of-way referred to as "Chelsa Street," dedicated to the County by plat found in Plat Book 2, page 170, Section 1, Western Hills subdivision in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia; and, WHEREAS, Section 15.1-482 (b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, requires that such action be accomplished by the adoption of an ordinance by the governing body; and, WHEREAS, notice has been given as required by Section 15.1- 431 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and a first reading of this ordinance was held on June 14, 1989; and the public hearing and second reading of this ordinance was held on June 27, 1989. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the southern portion of an unimproved fifty (50) foot right-of-way referred to as "Chelsa Street," and being the remain- ing portion of Chelsa Street from its intersection with Overbrook Drive south to its end, approximately 240 feet in length and G-a dedicated to Roanoke County, by plat found in Plat Book 2, at page 170, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, be, and hereby is, vacated pursuant to Section 15.1-482 (b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended; and, 2. That as a condition of the adoption of this ordinance, the County reserves and retains a twenty (20) foot sanitary sewer easement for an existing sewer main and reserves a twenty (20) foot waterline easement along the centerline of the fifty (50) foot right-of-way for future system upgrade; and, 3. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. 4. That Carlin Nucholls and Marty and Elizabeth Poff shall record a certified copy of this ordinance with the Clerk of the Circuit Court and shall pay all fees required to accomplish this transaction. ACTION NUMBER ITEM NUMBER ~"~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: June 14, 1989 AGENDA ITEM: Ordinance appointing the position of Clerk perform certain duties a separate individual to hold to the governing body and to as specified COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:a~~~~ mi`l'' ~( ~~ ~ ~ ~~~ BACKGROUND The State Code of Virginia, Section 15.1-117 states that under the County Administrator form of government, the County Administrator must also serve as Clerk to the Board of Supervisors. This section was previously amended to allow large urban counties with populations between 100,000 and 143,000 to appoint a separate position of Clerk. At the request of the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors, the General Assembly, at its 1989 session, amended the section further to allow counties with populations between 70,000 and 13,000 to appoint a separate individual to serve as Clerk to the governing body. This change extends the amendment to include Roanoke County. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION Cities in the Commonwealth of Virginia and large urban counties such as Fairfax, Henrico, Prince William and Chesterfield Counties have previously established a Clerk position separate from the chief administrator. The Clerk is responsible for the record keeping and administrative duties for the governing body. Smaller counties throughout the state have continued to designate the County Administrator as Clerk who is responsible for management of these functions, while assigning the routine clerical duties to a Deputy Clerk. With the recent amendment to the the Board of Supervisors appoint the responsibilities of the accurately reflect the duties ~ and will shift the management duties to the new position. State Code, I am requesting that a separate individual to manage Clerk. This change will more iow assigned to the Deputy Clerk and responsibilities for these The duties of the Deputy Clerk are now being filled by Mary Allen. She has five years experience in handling the various responsibilities of that position. She has also begun a four- year education program towards designation as a Certified Municipal Clerk, and presently serves as a Director of the Virginia Municipal Clerks Association. Her previous experience as Deputy Clerk and Administrative Secretary to the Board makes her the logical candidate for the appointment. FISCAL IMPACT None. The new position will be an exempt position eliminating the overtime expenses previously incurred to attend the Board of Supervisors meetings and other necessary overtime. One secretarial position will be deleted and the present Deputy Clerk position will be reclassified to a lower grade. STAFF RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors approve the ordinance following second reading on June 27, 1989. It is further recommended that the Board of Supervisors appoint Mary H. Allen to serve as Clerk to the Board of Supervisors effective July 1, 1989. The present secretarial position will be reclassified to the position of Deputy Clerk to assist the Clerk with the clerical responsibilities, to assume the duties of Clerk when necessary and to handle the secretarial responsibilities for the board members. There will be no new positions added to the Pay and Classification Plan as a result of this action. ~~~~ Elmer C. Hodg County Administrator Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred To: ACTION Motion by: - VOTE Yes No Abs Garrett Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, ON WEDNESDAY, JUNE 14, 1989 ORDINANCE APPOINTING A SEPARATE INDIVIDUAL TO HOLD THE POSITION OF CLERK TO THE GOVERNING BODY AND TO PERFORM CERTAIN DUTIES AS SPECIFIED WHEREAS, the 1989 session of the Virginia General Assembly amended Section 15.1-117 (Acts, 1989, Chapter 30) to authorize certain counties to appoint a separate individual to act as clerk to the governing bodies in order to perform certain record-keeping activities rather than the county's executive secretary (county administrator); and WHEREAS, Section 4.01 of the Roanoke County Charter provides that the County Administrator shall have all the powers and duties prescribed by Section 15.1-117 of the Code of Virginia, and that such other powers, duties, and responsibilities may be established by the Board of Supervisors; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on June 14, 1989; and the second reading was held on June 27, 1989. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows; 1. That the Board may appoint a county clerk who shall serve at the pleasure of the Board under the direction of the County Administrator. He or she shall be clerk of the Board and will serve as custodian of the corporate seal of the County and shall have such other duties as prescribed by general law or as the Board may prescribe. The clerk shall in addition (a) record in a book 1 G-3 to be provided for that purpose all of the proceedings of the Board; (b) make regular entries of all the Board's resolutions, ordinances, and decisions on all questions concerning the raising of money; (c) record the vote of each Board member on any question submitted to the Board if required by any member present; (d) preserve and file all accounts and papers acted upon by the Board with its action thereon; (e) give information to persons presenting communications or petitions to the Board of the final action of the Board thereof; (f) publish or cause to be published all reports, notices, ordinances, or other documents required by this charter or by general law to be published, except as otherwise expressly provided; (g) maintain all disclosure forms as required by Chapter 40.1 of Title 2.1 of the State Code; (h) prepare all papers and documents for the meetings of the Board; (i) issuance of solicia- tion permits pursuant to Chapter 19, Article II, Section 19.21- 19.27. 2. That the clerk may, and with the consent of the Board, appoint one deputy and such number of assistants as the Board may authorize. Either the clerk or the deputy shall attend all meetings of the Board. Any of the duties of the clerk may be performed by the deputy. 3. That if the Board chooses not to appoint a county clerk such duties and responsibilities shall be performed by the County Administrator. 4. Before entering upon the duties of this office, the clerk 2 ~' shall give bond before the Clerk of the Circuit Court of the County with surety to be approved by such Clerk in an amount to be fixed by the Board but in any case not less than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000), the premium for which bond shall be paid by the governing body out of the general County fund. 5. That this ordinance shall take effect from and after July 1, 1989. 3 ACTION # ITEM NUMBER ~' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: easement. June 14, 1989 Vacation of a portion of a 20 foot sanitary sewer COUNTYGADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: GLu„~.O BACKGROUND: Boone & Company, the developer of Boone Office Park, has requested the vacation of a portion of a 20 foot sanitary sewer easement dedicated to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors on October 18, 1985, in Deed Book 1228, Page 35. (Refer to attached map). The owner, Boone & Company, has plans to construct the third and final office building on the said property. The proposed office building will encroach into the existing easement, thus requiring the need for the vacation. All costs required to vacate and relocate the easement and sanitary sewer line will be incurred by the developer. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Roanoke County is requesting that the sanitary sewer easement be vacated in accordance with Chapter 11, Title 15.1-482 (b), Code of Virginia, 1950, by the adoption of the attached Ordinance. The County Staff is in agreement with the developers request. The first reading of the Ordinance is scheduled for June 14, 1989; Public Hearing and second reading is scheduled for June 27, 1989. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The County staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors adopt the proposed Ordinance to vacate the referenced easement. MITTED BY : •""~ ~ APPROVED : „~,~,,~,.~ Arnold Coved -~ Development Review nd Inspections Director ~c~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ----------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Garrett Received ( ) Johnson Referred McGraw to Nickens Robers .. - - c°~ . ~~ 4~ ,.. S q ., O ~,~.~~. v~• JS ~ o~. °c ~. ,~~ ` r ~' , i nj0 S 3S .S ~ <l/~v 2C ~~ W \ ~\ ~, ~' PROPERTY OF rj. GEDRC;E L. t300NE~ JOANNE FSOONE OT ~' ~ ~ WoRTH F~ . PSGONE, ~R. b3, ~ ~ ,3 9~• W s~ J ~ Q, w .• a PROPOSED 15' .~~~ 1'h n S.S. ESM'1: ~^~. ~/LZ',, ~~ 0. EXIS'1: M.H. 9s~ Z SEWER ESMT. . , •'rx• TO BE VACATED ~ '~Z' ~ PROPOSED 20' • S.S. ESMT. ~~ ~N s '4s~o,`~ ~ e sMT ~ ~ ~~ 3 ~q,~~~~Q~, . ~r. EX. S. S. E .~ / PROPE.iZTY OF 0~~0~ Y,y,o,~ ~ ' ~l c~oa,~E ~ vSooNE 4 3 ~~6 F+ 5.0- ~ /~ O 8 ~~ \0. ( ~~ ~ g9.0lo ~ b •. N 80.2'1'00' W ~_ TOT. 1 'S. ~/A. 20UTE'~ X419 PLAT SHOWING SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT TO BE VACATED BY ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS DATE ~ 6-1.89 G -'~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JUNE 14, 1989 ORDINANCE VACATING A PORTION OF A TWENTY (20) FOOT SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT IN THE BOONE OFFICE PARK Whereas, Boone & Company, the developer of Boone Office Park has requested the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia to vacate a portion of a twenty (20) foot sanitary sewer easement, dedicated to the County by deed found in Deed Book 1228, page 35 in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia; and, WHEREAS, Section 15.1-482 (b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, requires that such action be accomplished by the adoption of an ordinance by the governing body; and, WHEREAS, notice has been given as required by Section 15.1- 431 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and a first reading of this ordinance was held on June 14, 1989; and the public hearing and second reading of this ordinance was held on June 27, 1989. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That a portion of a twenty (20) foot sanitary sewer easement located within the Boone Office Park, and dedicated to Roanoke County on October 18, 1985, by deed found in Deed Book 1228, at page 35, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, be, and hereby is, vacated pursuant to Section 15.1-482(b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended; and, ~' -4 2. That as a condition of the adoption of this ordinance, Boone & Company hereby agrees to pay all costs and expenses required to vacate and relocate this easement and the sanitary sewer line therein; and, 3. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. 4. That Boone & Company shall record a certified copy of this ordinance with the Clerk of the Circuit Court and shall pay all fees required to accomplish this transaction. ACTION NO. ~,~,. ITEM NO. ;..~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: June 14, 1989 AGENDA ITEM: Amendment and readoption of Section 12-8 of the Roanoke County Code; adopting provisions of Title 46.1 and 18.2 of the Code of Virginia COUNTY ADMINISTR ~TOR'S COMMENTS' G~~ / BACKGROUND' SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Chapter 12, headed Motor Vehicles and Traffic, of the Roanoke County Code, contains within Article I, a Section 12-8 entitled Adoption of state law. The purpose of Section 12-8 is to incor- porate by reference those sections of Virginia law found in Title 46.1, Motor Vehicles, and Article 2 of Chapter 7 of Title 18.2, Crimes, of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, which are applicable to the regulation of traffic within Roanoke County. As a result of a decision of the Virginia Court of Appeals in 1986 in the case of Mitchell v. County of Hanover, 1 Va. App. 486, a question exists as to whether amendments, additions, or deletions to these referenced portions of the Virginia Code by the General Assembly subsequent to the date the Board of Supervisors adopted Section 12-8 would have the proper legal force. The purpose of this amendment is to make clear that the Board of Supervisors has taken affirmative action once the General Assembly has passed any amendments to bring these changes in the law into proper effect for Roanoke County. ALTERNATIVES AND IMPACTS: Failure to adopt this amendment risks having any traffic charge issued as a County violation which involves incorporation by reference of any Virginia code section amended by the General Assembly being dismissed as not properly subject to the County Code. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Board favorably consider this l.7 "` proposed amendment and reenactment. Respectfully submitted, Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney Action Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to __ Motion by Garrett Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers Vote No Yes Abs _ G_5 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, ON WEDNESDAY, JUNE 14, 1989 ORDINANCE AMENDING AND READOPTING SECTION 12-8 OF ARTICLE I OF CHAPTER 12 OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That Section 12-8, Adoption of state law, Article I, In General, of Chapter 12, Motor Vehicles and Traffic, be amended and readopted to read and provide as follows: Sec. 12-8. Adoption of state law. Pursuant to the authority of Section 46.1-188 of the Code of Virginia, all of the provisions and requirements of the laws of the state contained in Title 46.1 and in Article 2 (Section 18.2-226 et seq.) of Chapter 7 of Title 18.2 of the Code of Virginia, except those provisions and requirements which, by their very nature, can have no application to or within the County, are hereby adopted and incorporated in this chapter by reference and made applicable within the County. References to "highways of the state" contained in such provisions and requirements hereby adopted shall be deemed to refer to the streets, highways, and other public ways within the County. Such provision and requirements, as amended from time to time, are hereby adopted and made a part of this chapter as fully as though set forth at length herein, and it shall be unlawful for any person within the County to violate or fail, neglect or refuse to comply with any such provision or requirement; provided, that in no event shall the penalty imposed for the violation of any provision or requirement hereby adopted exceed the penalty imposed C~--s for a similar offense under the state law hereby adopted. The phrase "all of the provisions and requirements of the laws of the state" as used hereby shall be construed to include all amendments to said laws made effective prior to the date that this ordinance is adopted. 2. The effective date of this ordinance shall be July 1, 1989. ITEM NUMBER ~j AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: June 14, 1989 SUBJECT: Ordinance accepting an offer for and authorizing the sale and conveyance of surplus real estate - 37.86 acres located in the City of Salem ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: On May 26, 1989, the County received an offer to purchase a 37.86 acre tract of land owned by Roanoke County and which has been declared as surplus. This property is located within the boundaries of the City of Salem and more particularly described as Salem Tax Map Number 194-1-1, the Lloyd property. County staff has reviewed the offer, finds it to be of fair market value, and believes it to be in the County's best interest to dispose of this surplus property. Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter requires that any sale or disposition of public property be accomplished by ordinance. The first reading of the proposed ordinance was held on June 14, 1989; the second reading is scheduled for June 27, 1989. FISCAL IMPACT: A written offer has been received. The net proceeds from the sale of this property shall be allocated to the capital improvements funds. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Authorize the County Administrator to execute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County as are necessary to accomplish the sale and conveyance of said property, all of which shall be upon form approved by the County Administrator. G -b 2. Do not authorize the County Administrator to execute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County as are necessary to accomplish the sale and conveyance of said property, all of which shall be upon form approved by the County Administrator. RECOMMENDATION: The staff recommends Alternative #l. SUBMITTED BY: J hn D. Willey _ _ irector of Re~Estat Assessments Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred To Motion by: ACTION APPROVED: c - ~-~,, Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator VOTE No Yes Abs Garrett Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers „ ,... ORDINANCE ACCEPTING AN OFFER FOR AND AUTHORIZING THE SALE OF 37.86 ACRES OF REAL ESTATE, MORE OR LESS, LOCATED IN THE CITY OF SALEM (THE LLOYD PROPERTY) BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.01 of the Charter of Roanoke County, the subject property has been declared to be surplus, and has been made available for sale; and 2. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading on this ordinance was held on June 14, 1989; and the second reading was held on June 27, 1989, concerning the sale and disposition of 37.86 acres of real estate, more or less, located in the City of Salem; and 3. That offers having been received for said property, the offer of to purchase 37.86 acres of real estate, more or less, for the sum of is hereby accepted and all other offers are rejected; and 4. That the proceeds from the sale of this real estate are to be allocated to the capital reserves of the County, to be expended solely for the purpose of acquisition, construction, maintenance or replacement of other capital facilities; and G-t~ 5. That the County Administrator is authorized to execute such documents and take such actions as are necessary to accomplish the conveyance of said property, all of which shall be upon form approved by the County Attorney. -~- ~ A ~UJ~,R ~E'rING OF THE BOARD OF 5UPERVISO~NIS~TION ~ FiF.TI~ AT 'T'om RO~O ~ 14989 COUN'T'Y, VIRGINIA, CEN~R pN WEDNESDAY, 61489-9 APPROPRIATING FUSS FOR THE ORDINANCE ~--- YEAR BUDGET FOR 1989-90 FISCAL VIRGINIA ROANOKE COU~~ n notice duly published in the newspaper, a Public hearing WHEREAS, upo et for '1 11, 1989, concerning the adoption of the annual budg was held on Aprl Roanoke County for fiscal year 1989-90: and a roved visors of Roanoke County, Virginia, PP ~p,S, the Board of Super 5 1989, pursuant to the provisions of Section 13.02 of said budget on April 2 , r and Chapter 4 of Title 15.1 of the 1950 Code of the Roanoke County Charte Virginia, as mended; and 'rst reading of this appropriation ordinance was held on WHEREAS , the f i cond reading of this ordinance was held on June 14, ~y 23, 1989, and the se the rovisions of Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County 1989, pursuant to P Charter. Virginia, IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, BE as follows: made frcm the respective 1, That the following appropriations are hereby for the riod beginning July 1, 1989, and ending June 30, 1990, funds for the pe functions and purposes indicated: County Administrator may authorize the transfer of any 2, That the endlture balance or Portion thereof from one classification of exp County unen tiered ency . That the to another within the same department or ag COUNTY OF AOANOLB, VIRGINIA PROPOSBD FISCAL MBAR 1989-90 BUDGBT NAY 9, 1989 - ---------- -- -------------------------------- PBRSONNBL OPBAATING CAPITAL TRANSFBRS ------------------------------------------------ TOTAL BXPBNDITURBS: GBNBRAL FUND BOARD OF SUPBRVISORS X99,108 71,523 500 =171,131 CO ADMINISTRATOR 717 134 15,616 150,333 ADMINISTRATION INFORMATION A RBFBRRAL , 37,677 44,058 81,735 BUMAN RBSOURCBS 531 161 44,017 1,025 206 573 + ADMINISTRATION , 396 29 29,396 BMPLOYBB ABLATIONS 664 192 , 26,620 4,200 (37,143) 186,341 COUNTY ATTORNEY , ECONOMIC DBVBLOPMBNT 255 120 113,356 233,611 ADMINISTRATION , 23,500 23,500 NAR[BTING 311 286 177,611 5,680 34,625 TREASURER CONNONNBALTR ATTORNEY , 294,079 18,200 312,279 670 6 VICTIM/NITNBSS 6,670 , CONMISSIONBA OF TRB ABYBNUB 76fi 57 4,600 62,366 ADMINISTRATION , 998 71 13,329 85,327 REAL BSTATB PBASONAL PROPBRTY , 175,167 74,198 5,600 254,965 055 111 BUSINESS LICBNSB 96,683 14,372 , CLBRt OF TN6 CIRCUIT COURT 663 343 91,680 3,132 438 495 PUBLIC RBCORDS , 737 39 38,441 78,178 MICROFILM , POLICING AND INVBSTIGATING 819 170 49,700 220,519 ADMINISTRATION , 348 575 54,150 629,498 CIVIL DIVISION UNIFORM DIVISION , 1,316,503 248,678 180,099 1,745,280 234 641 CRIMINAL INVBST DIVISION 549,677 814 840 80,623 105,343 10,934 9,633 , 955,790 SBRYICBS DIVISION , 96Q 960 TRANSPORTATION SAFBTY COMMISSION GARB L CONFINBMBNT OF PRISONBRS 1,696,962 319,762 2,016,724 CIRCUIT COURT 7,350 300 93,614 760 16 1,680 100,964 18,740 GBNBRAL DISTRICT COURT , 730 730 NAGISTRATB 221 9 1,915 11,136 J d D RELATIONS COURT , 44,1?5 44,175 PROBATION ASST COUNTY ADMIN-MGT SBRYICBS 62,296 7,325 69,621 COUNTY ASSBSSOA 226 193 60,974 175 254,375 ADMINISTRATION , 630 310 34,935 6,203 351,768 RBASSBSSMBNT , 10,965 BOARD OF BQUILIZATION 10,765 FINANCIAL PLANNING 878 192 91,411 15,431 299,780 CENTRAL ACCOUNTING , 449 53 14,996 175 68,614 PAYROLL , 000 60 5,400 65,400 PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION 102 76 , 44,534 122,636 MANAGBMBNT AND BUDGBT , 70 034 1,060,284 1,130,318 RISL MANAGBMBNT PROCURBNBNT SBRYICBS , 178,083 39,996 195 218,274 -------------------------- PBRSONNBL OPBRATING -------------------------- ------------------------ CAPITAL TRANSFBRS ------------------------ ----------- TOTAL ----------- FIRB ADMINISTRATION 71,436 27,725 13,500 112,661 FIRB SUPPRBSSION 836,537 282,538 55,600 168,786 1,343,461 FIRB PRBVBNTION 95,004 8,300 3,300 146,604 755 79 TRAINING 31,950 956 58 39,605 086 149 8,200 1,770 , 209,812 TBCHNICAL SBRVICBS PLANNING AND RBSBARCH , 36,476 , 2,455 38,931 RBSCUB SQUAD OPBRATIONS 169,078 45,570 214,648 BNS SBRVICBS 198,466 9,075 207,541 BNBRGBNCI SBRVICBS PLANNING AND OPERATIONS 23,695 7,300 30,995 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ASST CO ADNIN-CONNUNITI SVGS 01,173 10,620 18,500 10,800 ( ~ 10,620 108,873 GENERAL SBRVICBS 181,752 145 826 24,318 663,008 2,800 90,596 208,570 1,579,749 SOLID NASTB , BNGINBBRING BNGINBBRING 214,565 16,757 11,460 (97,584 145,198 DRAFTING A RBCORDS 95,777 971 0 14,264 364 9 500 000 15 (39,758) 730) (57 66,783 77,605 CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION , 11 256 46 , 744 43 , 110,000 , 200,000 DRAINAGB ROADAAI , 35,630 , 4,700 40,330 STRBBT LIGHTING BUILDING NAINTBNANCB 245,401 98,441 524,743 46,060 98,441 816,204 PLANNING k ZONING ADMINISTRATION 233,075 39,528 1,900 274,503 ZONING ORDINANCB 8,900 8,900 695 18 PLANNING COMMISSION 15,995 2,700 , DBVBLOPMBNT RBVIBN 134 83 2,085 85,219 PERMITS DBVBLOPMBNT RBVIBN , 47,983 1,400 49,383 CONSTRUCTION BUILDING SBRVICBS 168 40 000 7 47,168 ADMINISTRATION INSPECTIONS , 172,261 , 23,413 20,000 215 674 ASST CO ADNIN-HUNAN SBRVICBS 68,504 9,171 97,675 GROUNDS NAINTBNANCB GROUNDS NAINTBNANCB 620,987 208,599 33,550 863,136 LBAF COLLECTION 26,150 26,150 200 4 STRBBT SIGNS 4,200 , PARRS AND RBCRBATION COMNUNITI EDUCATION 92,947 1,000 93,947 LBISURB ACTIVITIBS 95,360 1,000 96,360 539 33 OUTDOOR ADVBNTURB 33,163 376 , 701 83 SENIOR CITIZENS 80,601 3,100 , 300 52 SPBCIAL BVBNTS 48,900 653 79 3,400 880 17 , 97,533 TNBRAPBUTICS ADULT ATHLETICS , 59,733 , 4,000 63,733 IOUTH ATHLBTICS 140,976 590 208 10,000 952 89 14,431 150,976 312,979 ADMINISTRATION , , 599 412 412,599 PUBLIC HEALTH SOCIAL SBRVICBS ADMINISTRATION 1,601,907 , 226,823 4,040 1,832,770 030 954 PUBLIC ASSISTANCE 954,030 000 36 , 36,000 INSTITUTIONAL CARB , SOCIAL SBRVICB ORGANIZATIONS CONTRIBUTIONS SVC ORGANIZATIONS LIBRARY ADMINISTRATION RESEARCH AND CIRCULATION GBNBRAL MAINTBNANCB JOINT BOTBTOURT/RXB CNTY LIB 6XTBNSION k CONTINUING EDUCATION ELECTIONS RBGISTRATION 6LBCTIONS ANIMAL CONTROL BMPLOYBB BENEFITS CONSOLIDATION MISCBLLANBOUS TRANS TO D68T-GBNBRAL TRANS TO DBBT SBRVICB-SCHOOL TRANS TO CAPITAL TRANS TO SCHOOLS TRANS TO GARAGB II TRANS TO YOUTR HAVEN II TRANS TO INTBRNAL SBRVICB TRANS TO UTILITY CAPITAL CONTINGBNT BALANCE SUB-TOTAL GENERAL FUND DBBT SERVICE FUND CAPITAL FUND YOUTH HAVBN II FUND RBCABATION FBB CLASS FUND COMMUNITY EDUCATION LBISURB ACTIYITIBS OUTDOOR ADVBNTURB SBNIOR CITIZENS SPECIAL BYBNTS THBRAPBUTICS ADULT ATHLBTICS YOUTH ATHLBTICS ADMINISTRATION INTBRNAL SBRVICBS FUND NANAGBMBNT INFORMATION SYSTEMS ADMINISTRATION OPERATIONS DBYBLOPMBNT - ----------- PBRSONNBL ------------ OPERATING ---------- CAPITAL TRANSFBRS ----- TOTAL ------------- ----94984-- ------- 94,984 30,006 30,000 108,612 650 109,262 768 926 661,283 265,485 , 900 62 21,816 62,900 24,753 125 , 46,694 87,524 17,170 104,694 92,931 26,899 119,830 28,357 12,175 46,532 107,689 42,355 14,000 164,044 594,298 594,298 200,000 200,000 811,349 511,349 3,146,121 3,746,121 1,646,575 1,646,575 901,443 901,443 28,639,950 28,637,950 120,000 120,000 78,658 78,658 305,832 305,832 40,006 40,000 50,000 50,000 362,353,648 6,607,879 6,601,879 1,051,443 1,051,443 235,927 71,816 1,000 308,743 15,181 6,789 2,250 24,220 13,502 26,826 1,700 42,022 4,300 23,T05 1,750 29,755 7,491 19,748 2,600 29,239 5,376 50,635 3,000 59,011 4,300 4,300 700 9,300 39,820 12,840 1,004 53,660 975 975 4,967 5,797 1,000 11,764 100,363 13,250 1,300 114,913 157,597 140,347 39,200 105,284 442,428 211,543 7,850 700 220,093 ------------ PHRSONNBL ------------- OPBRATING ----------- CAPITAL -- ------------- TRANSFBRS ------------- ------------ TOTAL ------------ CONNUNICATIONS ------------ 194,288 ------------- 96,812 --------- 2,000 273,100 UTILITY FUND UTILITY BILLING COLLBCTIONS 90,359 97,780 2,000 190,139 NBTBR RBADING 52,647 8,579 11,100 72,626 UTILITY ADMINISTRATION 189,327 50,626 23,410 263,363 KATBR OPERATIONS 368,532 1,447,420 15,000 1,830,952 WATBR NAINTBNANCB 218,091 323,485 169,230 708,806 SENBR OPBRATIONS 93,443 905,590 999,033 SBNBR MAINTENANCE 244,629 139,519 18,399 402,525 SANITARY SBNBR EVALUATION 212,412 140,950 154,845 568,007 NON-DHPARTMBNTAL-NATBR 1,344,959 162,494 1,507,453 NON-DBPARTNBNTAL-SBN6R 1,391,202 201,897 1,593,099 OFFSITB FACILITIES FUND-NATBR 189,529 189,529 OFFSITB FACILITIHS FUND-SBN6R 195,144 195,144 GARAGB II FUND 233,700 233,900 SUB-TOTAL GBNHRAL COUNTY FUNDS ;80,386,569 SCH(?OL OPHRATING FUND 358,048,697 SCHOOL BUS FUND 1,000,000 SCHOOL CAFBTBRIA FUND 2,702,000 SCHOOL FBDBRAL PROGRAMS FUND 1,486,214 900 217 SCHOOL CAPITAL IMPROVBMBNTS FUND , 500,000 2 SCHOOL VPSA LOAN FUND 1988 ISSUE , 000 115 1 SCHOOL VPSA LOAN FUND 1989 ISSUE , , 479,033 SCHOOL TBXTBOOB FUND 000 825 REGIONAL SPECIAL HDUCATION FUND , SUBTOTAL SCHOOL FUNDS =68,373,844 TOTAL 6XPHNDITURBS ALL FUNDS X148,760,413 RBVBNUBS: X62,353,648 GBNBBAL FUND 6,607,879 DBBT FUND 1,051,443 CAPITAL FUND 308,743 YOUTH HAYBN II FUND 259,946 RBCRBATION FBB CLASS FUND 1,050,534 INTBRNAL SBRVICBS FUND 8,136,003 UTILITY FUND 189,529 OFFSITB FACILITY FUND-NATBR 195,144 OFFSITB FACILITY FUND-SBWBR 233,700 GARAGB II FUND ------------- 80,386,569 SUB-TOTAL GBNBBAL COUNTY FUNDS 58,048,697 SCHOOL OPBRATING FUND 1,000,000 SCHOOL BUS FUND 2,702,000 SCHOOL CAFBTBRIA FUND 1,486,214 SCHOOL FBDBRAL PROGRAMS FUND 217,900 SCHOOL CAPITAL INPROVBMBNTS FUND 2,500,000 SCHOOL VPSA LOAN FUND 1988 ISSUB 1,115,000 SCHOOL VPSA LOAN FUND 1989 ISSUB 479,633 SCHOOL TBXTBOOX FUND 825,000 RBGION AL SPBCIAL EDUCATION FUND _____________ 68,373,844 SUB-TOTAL SCHOOL FUNDS 5148,760,413 TOTAL RBVBNUBS ALL FUNDS _____________ Administrator may transfer up to $10,000 frcgn the unencumbered balance of the appropriation of one department or agency to another department or agency, including the contingency account encompassed in the Non-Departmental appropriation. 3. That all funded outstanding encumbrances, both operating and capital, at June 30, 1989, are reappropriated to the 1989-90 fiscal year to the same department and account for which they are encumbered in the previous year. 4. That appropriations designated for capital projects will not laspe at the end of the fiscal year but shall remain appropriated until the completion of the project or until the Board of Supervisors, by appropriate action, changes or eliminates the appropriation. Upon completion of a capital project, staff is authorized to close out the project and transfer to the funding source any remaining balances. This section applies to appropriations for Capital Projects at June 30, 1989, and appropriations in the 1989-90 budget. 5. That all school fund appropriations remaining at the end of the 1988-89 fiscal year not lapse but shall be appropriated to The Local School Capital Improvements Fund in fiscal year 1989-90. That a school fund deficit at the end of fiscal year 1988-89 shall be satisfied by the reduction of the School Operating Fund budget in fiscal year 1989-90. On amendedznotion of Supervisor Nickens to approve ordinance with No. 5 amended to read "Local School Capital Improvement Fund", and that staff work with the School Board to ensure that the intent of the motion is carried out, seconded by Supervisor Garrett and carried by the following recorded vote: Aye; Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None 2 A COPY TESTS: ~. Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Reta Busher, Director, Management & Budget Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance John Hubbard, Assistant County p,~inistrator John Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator Don Myers, Assistant County p,~inistrator 3 ACTION # ITEM NUMBER _ "~' REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARS CpUNTYEADMINISTRATIONNCENTER AT A COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOK MEETING DATE: June 14, 1989 ITEM• Fiscal Year 1989-90 Budget Appropriation Ordinance AGENDA COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~~ BACKGROUND: g9-90 fiscal year budget was presented to the Bo1989f The 19 ril 11, the County Administrator on 24p 1989 and April Supervisors by s were held on January Budget public hearing ted with 1989 to receive written and dret.commenbudget was adoplc co - ll, ro osed annual bu g cerning the P p ril 25, 1989: the following changes on Ap • $819,905 in bond proceeds was removed from the School Capital Improvements Fund. School Bus Fund was reduced by $200,000. $100,OOOswFund to therCapitalmFund Facilitie Development. 000. Total interfund transfers was reduced by $10, $143,918 in bond proceeds was removed from the School Capital Improvements Fund. The amount of the anticipated VPSA borrowing was reduced by $130,000. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: ear Budget Attached for your approval is the 198Budgetlisa$148,760,413. Appropriation Ordinance. The total CountYThe 'pudget net of inter- This inclfe~s asl$111 365u879transfers. fund trans Water Offsite for Economic ALTERNATIVES AND IMPACTS: ~+-i STAFF RECOMMENDATION: of the appropriation ordinance will be The first reading will be held on June held on May 23, 1989. The second reading gg. Staff recommends approval of the firs eardBudgea 14, 19 Lion of the 1989-90 fiscal y readings and adop on June 14, p,ppropriation Ordinance after the second reading 1989. Respectfully su'Amitted, ~t~ ~ • ~ Elmer C. Hodge Reta R. Busher ement County Administrator Director of Manag ----___ and Budget ---- --------------- VOTE ----------------------- ACTION No Yes Abs Approved ( ) Motion by: Garrett Denied ( ) Johnson Received ( ) McGraw Referred Nickens To Robers ~+-i AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COU~'Y, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON WEDNESDAY, June 14, 1989 ORDINANCE APPROPRIA`T'ING FUNDS FOR THE 1989-90 FISCAL YEAR BUDGET FOR ROANOKE COUNTY. VIRGINIA WHEREAS, upon notice duly published in the newspaper, a public hearing was held on April 11, 1989, concerning the adoption of the annual budget for Roanoke County for fiscal year 1989-90; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, approved said budget on April 25, 1989, pursuant to the provisions of Section 13.02 of the Roanoke County Charter and Chapter 4 of Title 15.1 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this appropriation ordinance was held on May 23, 1989, and the second reading of this ordinance was held on June 14, 1989, pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the following appropriations are hereby made from the respective funds for the period beginning July 1, 1989, and ending June 30, 1990, for the functions and purposes indicated: l ~ ~ ~ COQxTT OF ROAIOLB, VIRGIgIA PROPOSED FISCAL TBAR 1989-90 BUDGET NAY 9, 1989 BZPBIIDITURBS: GBABRAL FUAD .BOARD OF SUPBRYISORS CO ADMIMISIRATOR ADMIIiISTRATION •INFORMATiON A RBFBRRAL ' BDMAM RBSOURCBS ADMIMISTRATION BYPLOYBB RBLATIONS CDD1iTY ATTORNBY BCOIiOMIC DBYBLOPMB]1T IDMIIiISTRATION MARLHTIHG iRBASDBBR COMMOBffBALTH ATTORMBY VICTIMINITNBSS COflMISSIOABR OF THB RBYBMUB ADMIAISTRATION RBAL BSTATB PBBSOMAL PROPBRTT aUSIMBSS LICBMSB CLBRL OF TflB CIRCUIT COURT PUBLIC RBCORDS MICROFILM POLICIIIG AHD INYBSTIGATIIiG 1DMIAISTRATION CIVIL DIVISION UNIFORM DIVISION CRIMIAAL INVEST DIVISION SBRYICBS DIVISION TRANSPORTATION SIFBTY COMIISSION GARB A CONFIABMBNT OF PRISONBRS CIRCUIT COURT 6BYBRAL DISTRICT COURT NAGISTRirB J t D RBLATIONS COURT P30BATION 1SST COUNT? ADNII-MGT SBRYICBS COUNTY ASSESSOR IDMINISTRATION RBASSBSSM®T PBRSOIiIiBL OPBRATIIiG CAPITAL TRAKSFBRS TOTAL w~___-w---------------~_~----------------------- - =94,108 134,711 31,611 161,531 192,664 120,255 286,311 294,079 57,166 71,99a 175,167 96,683 343,663 39 ,137 170,819 575,348 1,316,503 549,677 840,814 1,696,962 1,35D 300 62,296 193,226 310,fi30 71,523 15,616 44,058 44,011 29,396 26,620 113,356 23,500 111,611 18,200 6,670 4,600 13,324 14,196 14,372 91,680 3x,441 49,700 54 ,150 248,618 80,623 lOS,343 960 319,162 93, 614 16,160 130 9,221 44,1iS 1,325 60,914 34,935 500 1,025 l,200 (37,143) 5,680 34,625 5,600 3,132 180,099 10,934 9,633 1,680 I, 915 ITS 6,203 2111,131 150,333 81,135 206,ST3 29,396 196,341 233,611 23,500 504,227 312,279 6,670 62,366 85, 321 254,965 111,055 438,415 ia,17a 220,519 629,49a 1,145,280 641,234 955,190 960 2,016,724 100,964 18,140 130 I1,I36 44,1iS 69,621 u4,375 3SI,168 BOARD OF BQUILIZATIOI FIIANCIAL PLA1fIIIG CBITYAL -CCOUITIIC PATYOLL PUBLIC T2AN5PORTATIOI lllAlAGBIEIT AND BUDGET tISI tiANAGBYBR P4OCURBNENT SBRYICBS FIYB ' ADNINISTRATIOI FIRB SUPPRESSION. FIRB PRBYBNTION TIAINING lBCHNICAL SBRYICBS PLANNING AND RESEARCH RESCUE SQUAD ' OPBRATIONS BflS SBRYICBS BNBRGBNCT SBRYICBS PLANNING AHD OPBRATIONS HAZARDOUS NATBRIALS ASST CO ADNIN-CONNUNITY SYCS GBNBRAL SBRYICBS SOLID YASTB BNGINBBRING BNGIHBBRING DRAFTING 1'RBCORDS CONSTROCTION INSPBCTION DRAINAGE ROADYAY~ STRBBT LIGHTING BUILDING NAINTBNANCB PLANNING 1 ZONIIG IDMINISTRATIOI ZONING ORDINANCE PLAINING COtiNISSIOI DBVBLOPNBNT RBYIBY PBRNITS DBVHLOPHBI! RHYIBY COISTROCTIOI BUILDING SBRYICBS ADdIIISTR1TI0l IISPBCTIONS ASST CO ADNII-HDIAI SBRYICBS GROUNDS NAAINTEIANCE GROUIDS IAUTBIAIiCB LEAF COLLBCTIOI STREET SIGIS PAILS Al1D RBCRBATIOI COI!lUIITT BDUCATIOx LHISURB ACTIYITIBS OUTDOOR ADYBITURB SBIIOR CITIZBIIS SPECIAL BYBITS f PBYSOYIBL OPBYATIIG CAPITAL 1YAltSFBYS TOTAL 10,165 ~ 10,165 192,818 41,411 15,431 299,180 53,449 14,940 115 68,614 60,000 5,400 65,400 18,102 44,534 122,636 10,034 1,060,284 1,130,318 118,083 39,996 195 218,274 11,436 2?,125 13,500 l1t,661 836,531 282,538 55,600 168,186 1,343,461 95,004 8,300 3,300 106,604 31,950 39,605 8,200 19,155 58,956 149,086 1,110 209,812 36,416 2,455 38,931 198,466 23, 695 101,113 181,152 826,145 214,565 95,111 110,911 46,256 35, 630 245,401 233,015 8,900 15,995 83,134 41,983 !0,168 112,261 88,so4 169,018 4,015 1,300 10, 620 18,500 24,318 663,008 16,751 10,264 9,364 43,144 4,100 98, 441 524,143 45,570 (lo,aool 2,800 90,596 214,648 201,541 30,995 10,620 108,813 208,870 1,519,149 145,198 66,183 11,605 200,000 40,330 98,441 816,204 214,503 8,900 18,695 85,219 49,383 39,528 2,100 11,460 (91,584 800 (39,?S8) 15,000 (51,130) 110,000 46,060 1,900 2,085 1,400 1,000 Z3,4I3 9,111 20, 000 620,981 ZOS,S94 33,550 26,150 4,200 92,941 95,360 33,163 80,601 48,900 1,000 1,000 316 3,100 3,400 41,168 215,614 !1,675 863,136 26,150 4,200 93, 441 !6,360 33,539 83,101 52,300 ~~ PBRSONNBL OP BRATING C1PITIL TRANSFBRS TOTAL THBBIPBUTICS 19,653 11,880 91,533 ADULT ATHLETICS 59,133 4,000 ~ 63,133 YOQiH ATHLETICS 140,916 10,000 160,916 1DNINISTRITION 205,590 89,952 14,431 312,919 PUBLIC HEALTH 412,599 412,599 SOCIAL'SBRYICBS ADYINIST3ITIOY 1,601,901 226,823 4,010 1,832,110 PUBLIC ASSISTIICB 954,030 954,030 INSTITUTIONIL C1R8 16,000 36,000 SOCIAL SBRYICB ORGANIZATIONS 94,984 94,984 COMTYIBUTIONS SYC ORGANIZATIONS 30,000 10,000 LIBRARY ADMINISTRATION. 108,612 650 109,262 RESEARCH AND CIRCULATION 661,283 265,485 426,168 GBNBRAL MAINTBNANCB 62,900 62,900 JOINT BOTBTOURTIRgB CNTY LIB 21,816 24,153 125 46,694 BZTBNSION A CONTINOIHG BDUCATION 87,524 11,110 104,694 BLBCTIONS RBGISTRlTI01 ~ 92,931 26,899 119,830 BLBCTIONS 28,357 12,175 40,532 1NIMAL CONTROL !01,689 42,355 14,000 164,044 BMPLOYBB BBNBFITS 594,298 594,298 CONSOLIDATION 200,000 200,000 MISCBLLANBOUS 811,349 811,349 TRANS TO DBBT-GBNBRAL 3,946,111 3,146,121 TRANS TO DEBT SBRYICB-SCHOOL 1,646,515 1,646,575 TRANS TO CAPITAL 901,443 901,443 TRANS TO SCHOOLS 28,637,950 28,631,950 TRANS TO GARAGE II 120,000 120,000 TRANS TO YOUTH HAYBN II Tfl,658 18,658 TRANS TO INTBRAAL SBRYICB 305,812 306,832 TRANS TO UTILITY CAPITAL 40,000 40,000 CONTINGENT BILANCB 50,000 50,000 SUB-TOTAL GENERAL FUND :62,353,648 DBBT SBRYICB FUND 6,601,879 6,601,819 CAPITAL FUND 1,051,443 1,051,443 YOUTH H1VBY II FOND 235,921 11,816 1,000 308,143 RBCRBIiION FBB CUSS FOND COMMUNITY BDOCITIOM 15,181 6,189 2,250 24.220 LBISURH 1CTIYITIBS 13,502 26,820 1,100 42.022 OUTDOOR ADYBHTORB 4,300 23.105 1,150 2!,155 SDfIOR CITIZEIS 1,491 19,148 2,000 p •u! SPBCIIL B9BITS S,3T6 50,635 3.000 59,011 TSBa1PBOTIa ~ 4,300 4,300 100 1,300 IDULi ITHLBMa 39,820 12,840 1,000 53,660 TOOTS 1TSL8TIa 915 !15 1DIIIISTRITIOI INTBRYIL SBRYICBS FOID IA11GB!lBNT tIiFOBIl1TIDN 8181818 1DIIIISTIUTI01 OPBRITIOYS • DBVBLOPdBYT CO!(YYUYICITIOYS OTILITT FORD OTILITT BILLIYG COLLBCTIONS • YBTBR QBIDIYG . OTILITT ' ADYINISTRITI01• Y1TBR OPBRITIOYS iIATBR HAINTBYAYCB SBiIHR OPBRITIONS SBYBR dAINTBNANCB SAYITART SITYBR BYALOITION YOY-DBPART8BITIL-YATBR YON-DBPARTM811TAL-SBfiBR OFFSITB FACILITIES FOMD-~1rsR OFFSITB FACILITIBS FOMD-SBYBR GABIGB II FOND SDB-TOT1L GBIBRIL COUNTT FUNDS SCH04L OPBRITIYG FOND SCfl00L BOS FOND SCHOOL CIFBTBRII FOND SCHOOL FBDBRIL FROGRIIS FOND SCHOOL CiPIT1L D[PROYBIIBITS FOND SCHOOL oPSI L011 FOLD 1988 ISSOB SCHOOL YPS1 LORI FOID 1984 ISSOB SCHOOL TBZTHOOL FOID RBGI011L SPBCIIL BDOC1TI01 FDYD SOB-?OT1L SCHOOL FONDS TOT1L BIPBNDITORBS 1LL FONDS t~- .~ 4 PBRSOYIiBL OPHRITDG CIPITAL TRINSFBRS TOT1L 4,961 . 5,191 1,000 11,164 100,363 13,250 1,300 _ 114,913 151,591 140,341 39,200 105,284 442,428 211,543 1,850 100 220,093 194,288 16,812 2,000 213,100 90,359 91,180 .2,000 52,641 S,ST9 I1,I00 189,321 50,626 23,410 368,532 1,441,420 15,000 218,091 323,485 .161,230 93,443 905,590 244,629 139,819 18,311 212,412 140,150 154,845 1,344,959 1,391,202 233,100 190,139 12,626 Zfi3,363 1,830,952 108,806 999,033 402,525 568,001 . 162,494 1,501,453 201,891 1,593,099 189,529 189,529 195,144 195,144 .233,100 =80,386,569 =58,048,691 1,000,000 2.102,000 1,486,214 ' 211,900 1,500,000 1,115,000 411,033 825,000 =68,313,844 =148,160,413 ___-.-- ~,~,. ,~ ~ QBVB1tUBS: GHNBYAL FUND DEBT FUYD CAPITAL FUYD TOUTS HAVBY II FU1D FBCRBATION FBH CLASS FUND INTBQIIAL SHaVICHS FUND UTILITY FUND OFFSITH FACILITY FUYD-yATHH OFFSITB FACILITY FUND-SBYBA GAaAGB II FUND SUB-TOTAL GBNBBAL COUNTY FUNDS SCHOOL OPBaJITING FUND SCHOOL BOS FUND SCHOOL CAFBTBaIA FUND SCHOOL FHDHHAL PaOGflAHS FUND SCHOOL CAPITAL IgPAOYBBBNTS FUND SCHOOL VPSA LOAN FOND 1988 ISSUH. SCfl00G YPSA LOAM FUND 1989 ISSUB SCHOOL lHZT800L FUND flHGIONAL SPECIAL BDUCATION FUND SUB-TOTAL SCHOOL FUNDS a ~6Z,3S3,648 6,601,819 1,051,443 308,143 tS9,946 1,050,534 6,136,003 189,529 195,144 233,100 80,386,564 58,048,891 l,ooo,aoo 2,102,000 1,486,214 211,900 2,500,000 1,115,000 479,033 aa5,ooo 68,313,844 TOTAL HBYBNUHS ALL FUNDS 6148=160,413- • r.. ~, 2, That the County Administrator may authorize the transfer of any unencumbered balance or portion thereof from one classification of expenditure to another within the same department or agency. That the County Aclninistrator may transfer up to $10,000 from the unencumbered balance of the appropriation of one department or agency to another department or agency, including the contingency account encompassed in the Non-Departmental appropriation. 3, That all funded outstanding encumbrances, both operating and capital, at June 30, 1989, are reappropriated to the 1989-90 fiscal year to the same department and account for which they are encumbered in the previous year. 4. That appropriations designated for capital projects will not laspe at the end of the fiscal year but shall remain appropriated until the completion of the project or until the Board of Supervisors, by appropriate action, changes or eliminates the appropriation. Upon completion of a capital project, staff is authorized to close out the project and transfer to the funding source any remaining balances. This section applies to appropriations for Capital Projects at June 30, 1989, and appropriations in the 1989-90 budget. 5, That all school fund appropriations remaining at the end of the 1988-89 fiscal year not lapse but shall be appropriated to the School Capital Improvements Fund in fiscal year 1989-90. That a school fund deficit at the end of fiscal year 1988-89 shall be satisfied by the reduction of the School Operating Fund budget in fiscal year 1989-90. T ~^`, 3 ~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON WEDNESDAY, JUNE 14, 1989 ORDINANCE 61489-10 AUTHORIZING THE CONSTRUCTION OF A PUBLIC WATER SYSTEM TO SERVE A SPECIAL WATER SERVICE AREA INCLUDING REAL ESTATE ALONG SHADWELL DRIVE AND IN THE BELLVIEW GARDENS AND BELLEVUE ESTATES SUBDIVISIONS, THE COSTS THEREOF TO BE IMPOSED UPON CERTAIN ABUTTING PROPERTY OWNERS BY AGREEMENT, PROVIDING FUNDS THEREFOR, AND DIRECTING THAT AN ABSTRACT OF THIS ORDINANCE BE RECORDED SHOWING THE AMOUNT THAT WILL BE ASSESSED AGAINST EACH SUCH LANDOWNER WHEREAS, it is the judgment of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that a new public water system should be constructed as hereinafter provided, and that the cost thereof be assessed by contract to certain landowners, as pro- vided by law; and WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 112288-6 adopted by the Board on November 22, 1988, pursuant to the authority found in Article 2, Chapter 7 of Title 15.1 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, authorizes the County to impose certain costs upon benefiting property owners for certain local public works improvements; and WHEREAS, certain abutting and benefiting property owners have agreed to share in the equitable allocation and apportionment of the construction costs for said improvements; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on May 23, 1989, and the second reading of the ordinance was held on June 14, 1989. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the construction of a new public water system to serve a special water service area in the County of Roanoke which includes certain properties along Shadwell Drive and in the Bellview Gardens and Bellevue Estates Subdivisions is hereby auth- orized. This special water service area is designated on a cer- tain map which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. 2. That the estimated cost of this water project is $368,000. In consideration of the execution and performance of those contracts entered into between the abutting and benefiting landowners and Roanoke County, the County shall administer, con- struct, and finance this public water project. The property owners agree to pay a proportionate share of the cost of the con- struction of this project. Each abutting and benefiting property owner, in accordance with the terms and provisions of said con- tract, agrees to pay to the County the special water connection fee of $4,000. This $4,000 fee includes the off-site water facil- ity fee which will be credited against the cost of the project and the basic connection fee of $500 for the service lateral, meter box, meter setter, and the water meter. The special water connection fee shall include the in- dividual service line from the main water line located within a public easement adjacent to the property to the edge of that ease- ment, and the installation of a meter box, meter setter, and in- dividual water meter. A private water service line from the meter to a structure on the private property is the responsibil- 2 ity of the property owner, as well as any required plumbing and cross-connection permits. 3. That each property owner has paid the sum of Fifty Dollars ($50) of the basic connection fee upon the execution of the contract with the County. The balance of the basic connec- tion fee shall be paid on or before October 1, 1989. The land- owner further agrees to pay the balance of the special water con- nection fee ($3,500) either by October 1, 1989, or in seventy-two (72) equal monthly installments, unless otherwise specifically approved by the County. The interest rate of these installments shall be eight percent (8~) of the unpaid balance. 4. That the property owner shall execute a promissory note and a lien document or instrument which shall be recorded among the records of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia. This lien instrument or document shall secure the repayment of the promissory note by the property owner to the County and shall be a lien against the property and shall be sat- isfied upon any conveyance of the property. The property owner further agrees to pay the County any Clerk's fees or recordation costs which may be required to record said lien instrument or document in the office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court. 5, That any property owner within the special water service area applying for public water service after October 1, 1989, and within six years (6) after the completion of construc- tion of this project, shall pay a total water connection fee which shall include: a special water connection fee of Four Thou- sand Dollars ($4,000), the off-site water facility fee in effect 3 at the time of application, and the basic connection fee in effect at the time of application. This total water connection fee shall be due and payable prior to the connection to the pub- lic water system and no installment payment financing by the County shall be available under the provisions of this ordinance. 6. That in the event that the estimated cost of con- struction is less than Three Hundred Sixty-Eight Thousand ($368,000) then the County shall proportionately reduce the amount of the special water connection fee charged to each con- tracting property owner in a proportionate manner based upon the number of participating landowners. The County shall pay any costs and expenses of construction which exceed this estimated amount. 7. That the County Administrator is authorized to exe- cute, ratify, and confirm on behalf of the County those contracts offered by the property owners and to execute such other docu- ments and take such further actions as may be required to accomp- lish the purposes of this ordinance, all upon approval as to form by the County Attorney. 8. That this ordinance shall take effect immediately. On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor Robers and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: ~• Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk 4 Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Paul Mahoney, County Attorney John Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator Cliff Craig, Director, Utilities Phillip Henry, Director, Engineering Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance Reta Busher, Director, Management & Budget 5 ~- ACTION # ITEM NUMBER r "' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: June 14, 1989 AGENDA ITEM: Approval of Old Hollins Road Water Project COUNTY ADMINIST TO~R%' S COMMENT ~ ~ `~/~,P /J BACKGROUND' On February 28, 1989, the Board of Supervisors authorized staff to initiate the Old Hollins Road Water Project under action A-22889-6. First reading of the Ordinance to approve this project was held May 23, 1989. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The County has received an adequate number of executed agreements from the property owners in the special service area to make the project feasible. A map of the service area indicating the properties requesting service will be presented at the Board meeting. The executed agreements obligate the property owners to pay $4,000.00 as a total water connection fee. ALTERNATIVES AND IMPACT: 1. Approve the Old Hollins Road Water Project to upgrade the existing service area and provide water to the Belleview Gardens/ Belleview Estates area. The total project cost including engineering, construction, inspection and contingency is estimated at $400,000. Funds are available in the off-site water facility fee fund to finance the project. 2. Do not approve the project until a higher number of agreements are executed by the residents within the special service area. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board of Supervisors adopt the ordinance after second reading which will grant final approval for the Old Hollins Road Water Project under the conditions of an ordinance adopted to administer, construct and finance this public works improvement project. 5 4p"` xav APPROVED: SUBMITTED BY: • ~~~ (~ N ~ ''~ Elmer CAd °nistrator -___-__ Cli d D. Craig County_________________ Utility Director_______________________ -------------- VOTE Approved Denied Received Referred to - ACTION Motion bY~_-- No Yes Abs Garrett - - Johnson _ - McGraw - Nickens - -- Robers - ~{--v~. T A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOAOANOKESCOUNTYSADMINISTRATION A HELD AT THE R 1989 COUNTY, VIRGINIA, JUNE 14, CENTER ON WEDNESDAY, ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE CONSTRUCSPECIAL A PUBLIC WATER SYSTEM TO SERVE A WATER SERVICELADRIVENANDDINGTHEABELLVIEW ALONG SHADWEL BELLEVUE ESTATES SiJBDIVI GARDENS AND SIONS, THE COSTS THEREOF TO BE IMPOSED UPON CERTAIN ABUTTING PROPERTY OWNERS AND AGREEMENT, PROVIDING FUNDS THEREFOR, DIRECTING T ORDEDN SHOW ING TTAE AMOUNTRTHAT ANCE BE REC WILL BE ASSESSED AGAINST EACH SUCH LAND OWNER WHEREAS, it is the judgment of the Board of Supervisors that a new public water system of Roanoke County, Virginia, be constructed as hereinafter provided, and that the cost should as pro thereof be assessed by contract to certain landowners, vided by law; and WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 112288-6 adopted by the Board on 1988, pursuant to the authority found in Article 2, November 22, as amended, inia, Chapter 7 of Title 15.1 of the 1950 Code of Virg benefiting authorizes the County to impose certain costs upon rovements; and property owners for certain local public works imp roperty WHEREAS, certain abutting and benefiting P and owners have agreed to share in the equitable allocation ortionment of the construction costs for said improvements; app and WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was hel 1989, and the second reading of the ordinance was held on May 23, on June 14, 1989. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1 of a new public water system 1, That the construction ecial water service arf,a in the County of Roanoke to serve a sP and in the Shadwell Drive which includes certain properties along auth- ' w Gardens and Bellevue Estates Subdivisions is herebya cer- Bellvie nated on service area is desig orized. This special water ich is attached hereto and incorporated herein by tain map wh reference. ect is 2, That the estimated cost of this water proj consideration of the execution and performance of and benefiting $368,000. In between the abutting those contracts entered into shall administer, con- landowners and Roanoke County, the County The property ublic water project. and finance this p struct, the con- s a ree to pay a proportionate share of the cost of owner g roperty ction of this project. F.ach abutting and benefiting p stru said. con- y in accordance with the terms and provisions of owns , pe dal water connection tract, agrees to pay to the County the s facil- of $4,000. This $4,000 fee includes the off-site water fee of the project ainst the cost ity fee which will be credited ag •~ connection fee of $500 for tYie service lateral, and the base meter box, meter setter, and the water meter. shall include the in- The special water connection fee ervice line from the main water line located withiSea dividual s g of that ea the property to the ed e public easement adjacent to meter setter, and in- ment, and the installation of a meter box, from the 'vidual water meter. A private water service line di i_s the responsibil- meter to a structure on the private property 2 - ~f~ • of the property owner, as well. as any required plumbizlg and ity ermits. cross-connection p 3. That each props^rty owner. has paid the sum of Fifty Lars ($50) of the basic connection fee upon the execution of Dol The balance of the basic connec- the contract with the County The land- 1989. tion fee shall be paid on or before October 1, a the balance of the special water con- owner further agrees to p y October 1, 1989, or in seventy-two 500) either by nection fee ($3~ e ual monthly installments, unless otherwise specifically (72) q a roved by the County. The interest rate of these installments PP shall be eight percent (8%) of the unpaid balance. 4. That the property owner shall execute a promissory and a lien document or instrument which shall be recorded note among the records of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Roano e County, Virginia. This lien instrument or document shall secure the property owner to the the repayment of the promissory note by Count and shall be a lien against the property and shal_1 he. sat- 3' owner ert The property isfied upon any conveyance of the prop y• rther agrees to pay the County any Clerk's fees or recordation fu costs which may be required to record said lien instrument or document in the office of the Clerk of the Circuit Cotlecial water 5, That any property owner within the sP rvice area applying for public water service after October 1, se 1989, and within six years (6) after the completion of construc- 'on of this project, shall pay a total water connection fee ti which shall include: a special water connection fee of Four Thou- sand Dollars ($4,000), the off-site water facility fee in effect at the time of application, and the basic connection fee in 3 . ~ ~~ "`~ effect at the time of appli.cati.on. This total water connection hall be due and payable prior to the connection to the pub- fee s the lic water system and no installment E>ayment financing by County shall be available under- the provisions of this ordinance. 6 , That in the event th<, t the estimated cost of con- struction is less than Three Hundred Sixty-Eight Thousand ro ortionately reduce the 000) then the County shall p P ($368, amount of the special water connection fee charged to each cthe tracting property owner in a proportionate manner based upon The County shall pay any artici ating landowners. number of p p costs and expenses of construction which exceed this estimated amount. 7, That the County Administrator is authorized to exe- cute, ratify, and confirm on behalf of the County those contracts offered by the property owners and to execute such other docu- ments and take such further actions as may be required to accomp- lisp the purposes of this ordinance, all upon approval as to form by the County Attorney. 8. That this ordinance shall take effect immediately. 4 !~ 3 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNT1989MINISTRATION CENTER ON WEDNESDAY, JUNE 14, ORDINANCE 61489-11 AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION OF REAL ESTATE FOR A PUMP STATION AND WATER STORAGE TANK AND WATER LINE EASEMENTS, OLD HOLLINS ROAD WATER LINE PROJECT BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading concerning the acquisition of real estate for a pump station and a water storage tank and twelve (12) easements for the Old Hollins Road Water Line Project was held on April 11, 1989. A second reading on this matter was held on June 14, 1989. 2. That these real estate and easement acquisitions are for a water line project in the Hollins area of the County. This project will provide necessary utility service to the citi- zens of Roanoke County. 3, That the properties to be acquired are identified as follows: Tax Map 28.13-1-23 28.13-1-23.7 28.13-1-2-3 28.13-2-3.1 28.13-2-3.2 28.03.1-2 28.03-1-1 28.03-2-10 28.00-1-6 28.04-2.9 28.04-2-10 28.04-2-11 Pro erty Owner Myrtle Garman Reginald Garman Stephen Davidson Stephen Davidson Winter Properties Ingersoll-Rand Co. Kathryn Taylor Paul Henson Bradshaw-Trustee William Sapp Mark Vinson Robert Runyon Acquisition Easement Easement Easement Easement & Property Easement Easement Easement Easement Easement & Property Easement Easement Easement ..- , 4. That the consideration for the acquisition of property for the pump station and water storage tank shall not exceed the assessed value of the property; and that the consideration for the acquisition of the easements shall not exceed forty (40~) percent of the assessed value of the property. That the sum of ten thousand ($10,000) dollars is hereby appropriated for these real estate acquisitions. 5. That the County Administrator is authorized to execute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County as are necessary to accomplish the conveyance of said property, all of which shall be upon form approved by the County Attorney. On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor Nickens and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: ~d Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Paul Mahoney, County Attorney John Willey, Director, Real Estate Assessment Phillip Henry, Director, Engineering Cliff Craig, Director, Utilities Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance 2 ITEM NUMBER' ,= MEETING OF THE BOARD AT A REGULAR THE ROANORE COUNTYr VIRGINIA HELD AT MEETING DATE: June 14, 1989 OF SUPERVMINISTRATIONNC LATER COUNTY AD to acquire neceWa~e~ AGENDA ITEM: Authoriz~he Old Hollins Road property to construct COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR-S COMMENTS: ~~ easements and Line Project INFORMATION royal to SUMMARY OF iven tentative aPP royal of Supervisors has g project. Final aPP The Board Water Line the property the proposed Old Hollins Road the contracts between ect to completing the project. will be subj to fund ril 11, ,...,.,ors and Roanoke County nce was held on AP 89 was The first reading of • the second reading to 1989- continued until the projec of Supervisors. The proje line easements Th storage tank. the Ordln on April 25, 19 be held roved by the Board was officially aPP water acquisition of several for a pump station and water ct will involve also properties ro erties involved: following is a list of p P Ac uisition Owner Tax Nla Property Easement Myrtle Garman Easement 28.13-1-23 Reginald Garman Eas~nent .7 28.13-1- Stephen Davidson Easement & 28.13-1-2-3 28 13-2-3.1 Stephen Davidson ter Properties Easement sement . 2-3.2 28.13- Win Ingersoll-Rand Co. Ea Easement 28.03.1-2 Kathryn Taylor Easement 28.03-1-1 pawl Henson Easement & 28.03-2'10 gradshaw-Trustee Easement 28.00-1-6 William SaPP Easement 28.04-2.9 Mark Vinson Easement 28.04-2-10 Robert Runyon 28.04-2-11 property Property ~{ -3 of acquisition for recommend that f llowing: S t a f f roue d y be based on the easements and p p for the pump station and ro erty the assessed 1_ Acquisition eftankpbe based on water sto~he property. value of easements not to exceed 40$ 2. Acquisition of the property. of the assessed value of acquisition is FISCAL IMPACTS an d property the Utility cost of easementand will be part of ect. T h e exceed $10,000 Road Water Line Proj on final approval of the project estimated not cost for the Old Hollins Fund Project These funds wo 1Supervisorsle up by the Board ENDATION conduct the second STAFF RECOMM t h e B oar d a recommends that easements at Staff acquisition of ro erty at a of the assessed value; and p p th e O l d reading of an ordinance authorizing as needed for to exceed 40$ value cost not assessed cost not to exceed the ect. Hollins Road Water Line Proj ppPROVED BY SUBMITTED BY: ~~ ~-- J~~ Elmer C. Hodge ,Henry, County p,dministrator Phi11torT En inee ing ------------------ Direc of g _ ---------------------------- VOTE Yes Ab` ------------------------ACTION No .._ Garrett - - Approved ( ) Motion bY: Johnson Denied ( ) McGraw - - Received ( ) Nickens Referred Robers - To ~- 2 s ~a......_- - • o / .~1 ~ _ ~ ~ . lM , ~ 2 • ,~(v . ~ ~, . ~ _ ~y / ,- ~~ ,• n ~ ~• a 606 ~ ... •~ ;•~,. ` ~I % SPECIAL SERVICE AREA ~ :- < • M N '~ ~~ ; M M ~ •• y„ ~ a ~ . • ~ ~ ~ .' .~ ~. • 4 •:. •.~ Q t ~ ~ ~ ARpMORE DRiVE~= ~~~ o ~ T' -. • + / ~ 1 • . ; GARMAry ROAD ~ .~ _ ~ • .• COMMUM ~PMENT ES AND D _ •M ~• ~ ` I Pur~P .s7 f1oNt~ ~ I /,~ /~ • op PROPOSED TANK /\ l ~ ~ ~ ~~ WATER SYSTEM PETITION' ~;~( '~ `fir Qry00 (( ~~1 ~~~ ~- WATER PROJECT OLD NOLlINS ROAD`~'AREA 3 . ~~ A'T A REGULAR MEETING OF 'THF' BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELL) AT THE ROANOKI~ COUNTY AllMINIS`TRATION CENTER ON WEllNESDAY, JTINE 14, 1989 ORllINANCE AUTHORIZING T11E ACQUISITION OF REAL ESTATE FOR ~'~ PUT1P STATION AND WATEK STORAGE TANK AND WATER. LINE EASEMENTS, OLD HOLLINS ROAD WATER LINE PROJECT BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading concerning the acquisition of real estate for a pump station and a water storage tank and twelve (12) easements for the Old Hollins Road Water Line Project was held on April 11, 1989. A second reading on this matter was held on June 14, 1989. 2. That these real estate and easement acquisitions are for a water line pr.-oject in the Hollins area of. the County. This project will provide necessary utility service to the citi- zens of Roanoke County. 3. That the properties to be acquired are identiF.ied as follows: Tax Map Property Owner Acquisition 28.13-1-23 28.13-1-23.7 28.13-1-2-3 28.13-2-3.1 28.13-2-3.2 28.03.1-2 28.03-1-1 28.03-2-10 28.00-1-6 28.04-L . 9 28.04-?_- 10 28.04-2-11 Myrtle Garman Keginald Garman Stephen Davidson Stephen Davidson Winter Properties Ingersoll-Rand Co Kathryn Taylor Paul Henson Bradshaw-Trustee William Sapp Mark Vinson Robert Runyon Easement Easement Easement Easement & Propc;rt.y Easement Easement Easement Easement Easement & Property Easement Easement. Easement 4. That the cons dr~rat. ion f ~~~?° the acquisition of proper- ty for the pump station ;jrrc.l water Est :;r:~.ge tank shall not axceed the assessed value of thc~ prc,per•t~~; and that the consideration for the acquisition of the ~~+^s=ment.s shall not exceed rorty (4C%) percent of the assessed value of t:he: prop erty. That the sum of ten thousand ($10,000) rtolJars is h~reliy appropriated. for these real estate acquisitions. 5. That the County Administrator is authorized to exe- cute such documents and take such action s on behalf of Roanoke County as are necessary to accomplish the conveyance o± said pro- perty, all of which shall be upon form approved. oy the Cou.nt:y Attorney. f ,: AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOAR ~ COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKESCOUNTYSADMINISTOANOKE CENTER ON TUESDAY, JUNE 14 RATION ORDINANCE 61489-12 ~ 1989 OF THE ----~--- `MENDING CHAPTER 7, BUILDIN ROANOKE COUNTY CODE BY THE ADDITION OF RARTICLE V~ FEES, AND INCREASING SAME WHEREAS ' Section 2.01 of the Roanoke County Charter grants to Roanoke County certain powers, including the contained in Section 15.1- Powers 906 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, which authorizes establishing fees for Permi enforcement of an is in the Y ordinance or regulation; and WHEREAS, Section 15.1-510.1 of the Code of Virginia amended, authorizes counties to charge such reasonabl ~ as the issuance of e fees for permits and the performance of inspections; and WHEREAS, Section 36-105 of the Code of Virginia amended, authorizes local ~ as governments to enforce the provisions of the Uniform Statewide Building Code, and to 1 defray the cost of such enforcement and an evy f ees to Y appeals; and WHEREAS, Roanoke County adopted and established a building permit and fee schedule on Se tember 1 P ~ 1974; and WHEREAS, legal notice of a public hearing concerning the adoption of an ordinance increasing these fees as required b was Provided y law, and the first reading and public hearing on this ordinance was held on May 23, 1989, and the se and public hearing was held on June 14, 1989, cond reading NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board Supervisors of Roanoke Count of Y. Virginia, as follows: Building Regulations of the Roanoke r 7 , That Chapte 1• Fe ddition of Article V, es- t Code is hereby amended by the a Coun y to provide as follows: ARTICLE V. FEES Division 1. Generally. Section 7-71• Building or Demolitions. chedule of fees stablished the following s e There is hereby ermits: nd Demolitions p for Building a Fee Demolition Valuations Buildin or $25.00 thousand valuation $ .Ol to $ 4,000 6,00 per 20,000 120.00 plus $5 per 000 to 4 r thousand thousand , lus $2 pe 20,000 to 100,000 520.00 p 320.00 plus $1 per to 500,000 1 thousand sand , 100,000 500,000 to 1,000,000 1,820.00 plus $.50 per thou Over $1,000,000 Reinspection Fee $25.00 - Residential - $25 .00 Certificate of Occupancy Fee Commercial - $ Electrical. Section 7-72. schedule o following f fees hereby established the i s There for electrical permits: 00. $25 . ctrical permit shall be issued for less than le No e Reinspection Fee $25.00 $ Wirin to ouie~ss (o en and concealed 6.00 8,00 1 to 10 out 10.00 11 to 20 outlets 12.00 21 to 30 outlets 15.00 31 to 50 outlets 51 to 100 outlets 15.00 plus each outlet over 100 - $ .10 All over 100 outlets $ 4.00 res t u Fix 6.00 _ _ _ 1 to 20 lights 8.00 21 to 40 lights 12.00 41 to 75 lights 15.00 76 to 150 lights 151 to 350 lights 25.00 plus each light over 350 - $ .10 All over 350 lights 2 Ser- vl' ~.- and under 150 amp tO 151 amP 400 p to 201 amP 401 amP over ic service ane lectr Temporary $ 7.00 10.00 12.00 15.00 25.00 (for each inspection) fans and disposals Mo_ t_ o~ 1 2 H.p. and under andncluding 1 H.P• Cost of / l 2 H.P. to and P. Cost of over /H.P. to and including lOHH.P• Cost of over 1 to and including Cost of over 3 H'p' All over 10 H • P sling electric furnace and heat pump Electric HeCe gaSeboard, $ 2.00 each 5.00 each 7.00 each 10.00 each 15.00 each $10.00 cook tops- liances es- space heaters, smoke S ecial A heaters, rang oil furnaces, uirin$ water aratus, gas °r liances req 5,00 each Electrislgns- radio aPP other aPP dryer, dishwasher, and ovens- detectorWiring special Mechanical. schedule °f fees for Section 7'73• following is hereby established the There Fee mechanical permits: or Estimated Cost Amount of Contract ,00 to $ 500.00 $ 1,000.00 500.01 to 2-000.00 1,000.01 to 2,000.01 to 3,000.00 3,000.01 to 4,000.00 4,000.01 to 5,000.00 In excess of $5,000.00, additional $1,000.00 or ReinspeCtion fee $25.00 'on 7-74• Plumbing the fee shall be $75.00 plus fraction thereof. Sects is hereby established $25.00 30.00 40.00 50.00 60 .00 75.00 $ 4.0 0 for each the following schedule of fees for There ermits: less than $25.00. plumbing P issued for No plumbing permit shall be 3 $ 3.00 1,00 3.00 Fixtures (each) 10,00 Floor drains 25,00 Water heater 25,00 Sewer Trailers in effect from and ReinspeCtion fee shall be 2• That this ordinance 1989• seconded by Supervisor after July 1- Nickens- On motion of Supervisor recorded vote: carried by the following Garrett Garrett and Robers- McGraw- Nickens- Supervisors Johnson- AYES NAYS : None A COPY TESTS: D~ruty Clerk Mary H• Allen- Board of Supervisors Roanoke County Development & Inspections cc: File Director- Arnold Covey- Treasurer Alfred C. AndersonCo~issioner of Revenue R• Wayne Compton- Attorney Paul Mahoney, County Attorney Burkart- Commonwealth Skip Magistrate Ave.- Rke 24016 Sheriff's Department 315 Church Roanoke Law Library- Main Library Code Book Counsellor Roanoke County Intake Roanoke County J&D Court- 4 ACTION # ITEM NUMBER__-"1--~' F THE BOARD OF SUPEADMINISTRp,TION CENTER AT A REGULAR MEETING 0 VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY COUNTY- MEETING DATE: June 14, 1989 of Ordinance Amending the Roanoke Second Reading Building Permit Fees AGENDA ITEM: Code and Increasing County COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~i~ Board of Supervisors BACKGROUND: the Roanoke County fees 1989' ossibility of increasing On March 14- the p help handle the hiring additional sta d service area. On instructed the staff 'to stu y inspections ermit to off-set the cost °ermits, are of P roved the increased buland p ep increased1989be~he Board aPP ~,,~blic hearing May 12, fees and authorized the staff to se a L an ordinance. ~~L, INFORMATION: ~~y currently uses SUMMARY OF ections 1974. ment and Insp tember 1- The Department of Dthatlwas adopted on SeP a building fee schedule ermits and conducting County is issuing with the current fee Presently Roanoke 4.00 to $10.00 ections at the cost of $ insp the erating costs and schedule. ment off-set our current oP of Develop- the to the Department In order cost that a~ roximate $64,000.00 increased servfollows:I ections will incur with t e `P need to be increased as and Insp minimum basic fees 4,00 following schedule from $ ermit fee or demolition with 1. Increase the current P 00 to $5.00 per to $6.00 per thousand for bandd$3g om $ 2 0. 0 0 0. 0 0 t o valuation up to $20,000.00 thousand for valuations his proposed fee sc'nnokee and Salemntly $100,000.00. T being utilized by the Cities of Roa ~~~ 2. Increase all minimum permit fees from $10.00 to $25.00 for small buildings, reinspections, electrical, plumbing and mechanical permits. 3. Increase the Certificate of Occupancy for newly con- structed businesses from $10.00 to $25.00. The first reading and Public Hearing of the Ordinance was held on May 23, 1989; staff recommends approval of Ordinance after second reading on June 14, 1989. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors adopt the attached Ordinance following the second reading to be held on June 14, 1989. SUBMITTED BY: Arno`~d Covey \ Development Review an Inspections Director, APPROVED: ~~ ~~ Elmer C. Ho ge County Administrator --------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied Received Referred to Garrett Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers ~~`~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF' THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON WEDNESDAY, JUNE 14, 1989 ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 7, BUILDING REGULATIONS, OF' THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE BY THE ADDITION OF ARTICLE V, FEES, AND INCREASING SAME WHEREAS, Section 2.01 of the Roanoke County Charter grants to Roanoke County certain powers, including the powers contained in Section 15.1-906 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, which authorizes establishing fees for permits in the enforcement of any ordinance or regulation; and WHEREAS, Section 15.1-510.1 of the Code of Virginia, as amended, authorizes counties to charge such reasonable fees for the issuance of permits and the performance of inspections; and WHEREAS, Section 36-105 of the Code of Virginia, as amended, authorizes local governments to enforce the provisions of the Uniform Statewide Building Code, and to levy fees to defray the cost of such enforcement and any appeals; and WHEREAS, Roanoke County adopted and established a building permit and fee schedule on September 1, 1974; and WHEREAS, legal notice of a public hearing concerning the adoption of an ordinance increasing these fees was provided as required by law, and the first reading and public hearing on this ordinance was held on May 23, 1989, and the second reading and public hearing was held on June 14, 1989. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDIAANED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: ~-`~ ARTICLP; V . 1' EES Division. 1. Gcuie:rally. Section 7-71. Building or Demolitions. There is hereby established the following schedule of fees for Building and Demolitions permits: Building or Demolition Valu.ati.ons Fee $ .O1 to $ 4,000 $25.00 4,000 to 20,000 6.00 per thousand valuation 20,000 to 100,000 120.00 plus $5 per thousand 100,000 to 500,000 520.00 plus $2 per thousand 500,000 to 1,000,000 1,320.00 plus $1 per thousand Over $1,000, 000 1,820.00 plus $.50 pe r thousand Reinspection Fee $25.00 Certificate of Occupancy Fee - Residential - $10.00 Commercial - $25.00 Section 7-72. Electrical. There is hereby established the following schedule of fees for electrical permits: No electrical permit shall be issued for less than, $25.00. Reinspection Fee $25.00 Wiring to outlets (open and concealed) 1 to 10 outlets $ 6.00 11 to 20 outlets 8.00 21 to 30 outlets 10.00 31 to 50 outlets 12.00 51 to 100 outlets 15.00 All over 100 outlets - $15.00 plus each outlet over 100 .10 Fixtures 1 to 20 lights $ 4.00 21 to 40 lights 6.00 41 to 75 lights 9.00 76 to 150 lights 12.00 151 to 350 lights 15.00 All ov er 350 lights - $25.00 plus each light over 350 .10 ++-~ 150 amp and under 151 amp to 200 amp 201 amp to 400 amp 401 amp and over Temporary electric servile (for each inspection) Motors Cost of 1/2 H.P. and under and fans and disposals Cost of over 1/2 H.P. to and including 1 H.P. Cost of over 1 H.P. to and including 3 H.P. Cost of over 3 H.P. to and including 10 H.P. All over 10 H.P. Electric Heat Baseboard, ceiling electric furnace and heat pump $ 7.00 10.00 12.00 15.00 25.00 $ 2.00 each 5.00 each 7.00 each 10.00 each 15.00 each $10.00 Special Appliances Electric water heaters, ranges, space heaters, cook tops, ovens, signs, radio apparatus, gas or oil furnaces, smoke detectors, dryer, dishwasher, anal other appliances requiring special wiring $ 5.00 each Section 7-73. Mechanical. There is hereby established the following schedule of fees for mechanical permits: Amount of Contract or Estirnated Cost Fee $ .00 to $ 500.00 $25.00 500.01 to 1,000.00 30.00 1,000.01 to 2,000.00 40.00 2,000.01 to 3,000.00 50.00 3,000.01 to 4,000.00 60.00 4,000.01 to 5,000.00 75.00 In excess of $5,000.00, the fee shall be $75.00 plus $4.00 for each additional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof. Reinspection fee $25.00 Section 7-74. Plumbing 'There is hereby established the following schedule of fees for plumbing permits: No plumbing permit shall be issued for less than $25.00. H-~I ' 'Fixtures (each) Floor drains Water heater Sewer Trailers Reinspection fee $ 3.00 1.00 3.00 10.00 25.00 25.00 2. That this ordinance shall. he in effect from and after July 1, 1989. . •, ~ f ETING OF THE BOARD OF SC~UNTYS ADMINISTRATOION AT A REGULAR ME HELD AT THE ROANOKE 1989 COUNTY, VIRGINIA- WEDNESDAY, JUNE 14, CENTER ON TO INCREASE THE ORDINANCE 61489-13 SALARIES OF THE MEMBEE COUNTY PURS ANT TO SUPERVISO3S O~ ~F N~HE ROANOKE 1COF THE SECTION 46 .01 CHARTEF VI GINIATION 14.1- CODE 0 the County of WHEREAS, Section 3.07 of the Charter of compensation of members of the board of Roanoke provides for the and d the procedure for increasing their salaries; supervisors an the 1950 Code of Vir- WHEREAS, Section 14.1-46.01:1 of tablishes the annual salaries of members of as amended, es and ginia, ovulation brackets; boards of supervisors within certain p .. he Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County- WHEREAS, t Board retofore established the annual salaries of ab- Virginia, has he has est o be $8 386 by Ordinance 61488-10 and further'hairman for members t ensation for the c lished the additional annual comp ice chairman of the Board to the Board to be $1,800 and for the be $1,200; and this section provides that the maximum annua WHEREAS, ear by an infla- aries therein provided may be adjusted in any Y sal and ercent, tion factor not to exceed five (5~~ P these a public hearing on the establishment of WHEREAS, salaries was held on May 23, 1989; and first reading on this ordinance was held WHEREAS, the 1989. the second reading was held on June 14, on May 23, 1g89' ORDAINED by the Board of it is hereby NOW, THEREFORE, salaries f Roanoke County, Virginia, that the annual Supervisors o Virgin- f the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, of members o reared by an inflation factor of five (5$) peke ia, are hereby inc 0~ of the Roano ursuant to the provisions of Section 3- cent p 1 of the 1950 Code of Vir- County Charter and Section 14.1-46.01: 805 for The new annual salaries shall be $8~ oard ginia, as amended. the B the chairman of members of the Board. In addition, the vice an additional annual sum of $1,800 and will receive 200. oard will receive an additional sum of $1. chairman of the B 1989. his ordinance shall take effect on July 1' Su ervisor T motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by p On and carried by the following recorded vote: McGraw McGraw, Nickens Supervisors Johnson, Robers, AYES NAYS: Supervisor Garrett A COPY TESTE: ~~~~ Deputy Clerk Mary H. Allen, ervisors Roanoke County Board of Sup cc: File Board of Supervisors Attorney Paul Mahoney, County Management & Budget Reta Busher, Director, Finance Diane Hyatt, Director- Human Resources D, Keith Cook, Director, 2 ACTION ~~ ITEM NUMBER ~• AT A REGULAR MEETINr, t:)F TH~~. f;0~ltl) OF SUPERVISORS OF Rc:~ANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT T[1C RO~a.NOt<:E COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTr'lt MEETING DATE: June 14, 1.989 AGENDA ITEM: Ordinance to increase the salaries of members of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County pursu- ant to Section 3.07 of the Roanoke County Charter and Section 14.1 •4E..c~1:1 of the Code of Virg ini.a COiJNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND: Last year on June 14, .1988, the Board adopted an ordinance to increase its salaries 14 1- 46 01 1 pursuant: t:o the provisions or Si_cti.on . . : of the Codc-~ Code and Section 3 07 of Virgi.nia• This sect. :ion of the State . of i the Gou.iity Charter rF~yuire tPiat arty ncrease in supervisor's salaries be accomplished by ordinance after public hearing between May ] and. June 30., Accy i n i 1imi.ted to an annual five (5`~) }~f~.rc:F~nt . i~~~Fla*_s.cn ~a:cr.t.nt. cre:~se _s SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The first reading of this proposed ordinance was held on far May 23, 1989; the second reading was held on June 14, 1989. The required public heari..tg en Cris ma±te.r vas, ;:-t`I~~dulrrt -:~t- p^c~ti, 23, 1989. 'The proposed salary For £uard members wi l be in.c.re~asc:a (~; om $8,:386 to $8,80.5. In addition, this ordinance est:abl ~:;hE„ t.}iE~ additional annual compensation "or the Chairman of the Roarc} at. $1,800 and Vice Chairman at $1,200• AI,'TERNATIVES AND IMPACTS :1'" Five (5%) percent increase in Board .,alarics: ($419 each :~ 5 = $2,095) STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Nene. ---_----_-- ACTION--- VOTE No Yes Abs Approved ( ) M t'on Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred To o i y• Garrett Johnson __ McGraw __i Nickens Robers Respectfully submitted, AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON WEDNESDAY, JUNE 14, 1989 ORDINANCE TO INCREASE THE SALARIES OF THE MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY PURSUANT TO SECTION 3.07 OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CHARTER AND SECTION 14.1-46.01:1 OF THE CODE OF VIRGINIA WHEREAS, Section 3.07 of the Charter of the County of Roanoke provides for the compensation of members of the board of supervisors and the procedure for increasing their salaries; and WHEREAS, Section 14.1-46.01:1 of the 1950 Code of Vir- ginia, as amended, establishes the annual salaries of members of boards of supervisors within certain population brackets; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, has heretofore established the annual salaries of Board members to be $8,386 by Ordinance 61488-10 and further, has estab- lished the additional annual compensation f.or the chairman for the Board to be $1,800 and for the vice chairman of the Board to be $1,200; and WHEREAS, this section provides that the maximum annual salaries therein provided may be adjusted in any year by an infla- tion factor not to exceed five (5%) percent; and WHEREAS, a public hearing on the establishment of these salaries was held on May 23, 1989; and WHEREAS, the first reading on this ordinance was held on May 23, 1989; the second reading was held on June 14, 1989. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that the annual salaries of members of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virgin- a • ' ~~ '~ ..:. ,gyp.? ia, are hereby increased by an inflation factor of five (5%) per- cent pursuant to the provisions of Section 3.07 of the Roanoke County Charter and Section 14.1-46.01:1 of the 1950 Code of Vir- ginia, as amended. The new annual. salaries shall be $8,805 for members of the Board. In addition, the chairman of the Board will receive an additional annual sum of $1,800 and the vice chairman of the Board will receive an additional sum of $1,200. This ordinance shall take effect on July 1, 1989. ~~- ~ AT A RE HILD ATE THE ROANOKE COUNTIY ADMINISTRATION CENTER O ON WEDNESDAY VIRGINIA, JUNE 14, 1989 RESOLUTION 61489-14 CREATING THE ROANOKE COUNTY RESOURCE AUTHORITY WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors ("Board") of Roanoke County, Virginia, ("County") has determined that it is in the best inter- ests of the County to create the Roanoke County Resource Authority pursuant to the provisions of the Virginia Water and Sewer Authori- ties Act, Chapter 28, Title 15.1, Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended ("Act"). A public hearing has been held in accordance with the requirements of Sections 15.1-1243 and 15.1-1250.01 of the Act. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. Creation of Authority. There is hereby created the Roanoke County Resource Authority ("Authority"). 2. Articles of Incorporation. The Articles of Incorporation of the Roanoke County Resource Authority are as follows: ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION OF ROANOKE COUNTY RESOURCE AUTHORITY ARTICLE I The name of the Authority shall be Roanoke County Resource Authority and the address of its principal office is 3738 Bramble- ton Avenue, Roanoke, Virginia 24018-0798. ARTICLE II The name of the incorporating political subdivision is County of Roanoke, Virginia. 1 ARTICLE III The names, addresses, and terms of office of the initial members of the Board of the Roanoke County Resource Authority ("Authority") are as follows: Name Address Term Expires Lee Garrett The address of each 12/31/89 Bob L. Johnson initial member is: 12/31/89 Harry C. Nickens P. O. Box 29800 12/31/89 Steven A. McGraw 3738 Brambleton Avenue 12/31/91 Richard W. Robers Roanoke, Virginia 24018 12/31/91 The terms of office of each initial members shall begin on the date of issuance of a certificate of incorporation or charter for the Authority by the State Corporation Commission. The successor of each member shall be appointed for a term of four years by the Board of Supervisors ("Board") of the County of Roanoke, Virginia, except that any person appointed to fill a vacancy shall serve only for the unexpired term. ARTICLE IV The purposes for which the Authority is created are to exercise all the powers granted to the Authority under the Virginia Water and Sewer Authorities Act, Chapter 28, Title 15.1, Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended ("Act"). The inclusion of preliminary estimates of capital costs, project proposals and rates for services in the Articles of Incorporation is impracticable. ARTICLE V The Authority shall serve the County of Roanoke, and, to the extent permitted by the Act and by the terms of such contracts as the Authority may approve, the Cities of Roanoke and Salem, the 2 Town of Vinton and such other public or private entities as the Authority may determine upon the terms and conditions established pursuant to such contracts. 3. Sanitary Landfill Operation. The Board hereby finds that (i) privately-owned sanitary landfill services are not available in a reasonable and cost-efficient manner and (ii) operation by the Roanoke County Resource Authority of a sanitary landfill and any related facilities or the contract for such operation in spite of any potential anti-competitive effect, is important in order to provide for the development and/or operation of a regional system of garbage and refuse collection and disposal for the County of Roanoke, the Cities of Salem and Roanoke, and the Town of Vinton and such other governmental units or private entities as the Authority may determine. 4. Effective Immediately. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption. On motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by Supervisor McGraw, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Paul Mahoney, County Attorney John Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator Phillip Henry, Director, Engineering 3 Cliff Craig, Director, Utilities Roanoke County Resource Authority File ACTION NO. ~ ~~`~ ITEM NO. SUPERVISORS OF RO~OCENTER BOARD OF TION MEETING OF THE COUNTY ADMINISTRA AT A REGULAR HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, June 14, 1989 Resource DATE: the Roanoke County MEETING Resolution creating AGENDA ITEM: Authority COUNTY ADMINISTRATORS COMMENTS: Board authorize BACKGROUND: requested that th ting a resolution 25, 1989, staff estion of adop Virginia ril the ~ the provisions of the uest, On Ap ublic hearing °n under roved this req holding a p authority The Board app ublic hearing and creating a service notice of p Water and Sewer the publicat on•of a and authoriasdrequired by law. to be held on resolution this issue is scheduled The public hearing on June 14, 1989' OF INFORMATION' of the Roanoke SUMMARY creation all of the e to this authority The attached resoit ion authorizes ater • It grants and Sewer Authorities Resource Autu der the Virginia W County powers authorized the better appears to be roposed Act' authority the P of an and finance issue bond The creation operate, authority could to construct, that this issuance of revenue alternativelt is anticipated of the notes and anticipation These landfill. notes (in the new landfill. from the users anticipation construct enerated bonds) to design and from the revenues 9 bonds would be repaid funds landfill. to temporarily advancits own °f the for the County to issue it is able occur until the It is necessary authority until debt cannot ement is to this ne This issuance of of Waste Manag by loan Division Depending on notes and bonds. to the made- ~ ermit application decision eland for the landfill County s p until a final sitin acquire the The Authority approved and the County may to the Authority. County the circumstanceSell that land land (and reimburse theof its and then isition of the from the proceeds site, the acqu expenses) would finance reliminary for similar p borrowing- ~U ~ % ° / ALTERNATIVES AND IMPACTS' fuse to adopt the thorityd resolution, The Board could r County Resource Au 1' the Roanoke and create and not create rd could adopt the attached resolution 2• The Boa uthoritY• County Resource A Thousand the Roanoke sum of One Hunda oan to the riate the from the unappropriated balance as The Board000ju1d apPrOp Dollars ($100, Roanoke County Resource Authority• STAFF RECOMMENDATION he Board hold the public hearing to t n of the Roanoke ended that the creatio adoption It is recomm concerning consider the secure citizen comments and to favorably County Resource Authority, of the attached resolution. Respectfully submitted, c ~'~ Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney Action Vote No Yes Ab Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Ref erred to ~-- Motion by Garrett Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers ~, 89' -~ l D OF SUPERVISORS OF ROp,NOKE COUNTY, MINISTRATION CENTER, ON WEDNESDAY MEETING OF THE BOAR AT A REGU~R THE ROANOKE COUNTY P'D 989 VIRGINIA. HELD A`r JUNE 14, THE ROp,NOKE COUNTY RESOURCE AUTHORITY nt . CREATING ,~ of Roanoke Cou Y RESOLUTION Board ) WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors (" termined that it is in the best inter- Virginia, ("County") has de the Roanoke County Resource Authors Y ests of the County to create of the Virginia Water and Sewer Authors- to the provisions of 1950, as pursuant of Virginia 15.1, Code ties Act, Chapter 28, Title ring has been held in accordance wit "Act") • A pubs is hea 01 of the Act . amended ( 1_1243 and 15.1-1250. the requirements of Sections 15• the Board of Supervisors of NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by Virginia, as follows: created the Roanoke County. There is hereby 1. Creation of Authority. Resource Authority ("Authority")• County of Incorporation Roanoke The Articles 2. Articles of Incorporation. are as follows: he Roanoke County Resource Authority of t INCORPORATION p,RTICLES OF OF ROANOKE COUNTY RESOURCE AUTHORIT p,RTICLE I County Resource shall be Roanoke The name of the Authority 3738 Bramble- he address of its principal office is Authority and t Avenue, Roanoke, Virginia 24018-0798. ton pgTICLE II County ' cor orating political subdivision is The name of the in P of Roanoke, Virginia. 1 ARTICLE III The names ,`~~,~ addresses, and to members rms of office of the initial ( Autho .of „the Board of y Reso the Roanoke Count ~~ rlty ) are as urce Authority follows: Name Addr- ess Lee Garrett Term Exbires Bob L. Johnson The address of each Harry C. Nickens initial member j.s; 12/31/88 Steven A. McGraw P' ~• Box 29800 12/31/89 Richard W. Robers 3738 Brambleton 12/31/88 Roanoke Avenue 12/31/91 Virginia 24018 The terms of office of each initial 12/31/91 of issuance of a member shall begin on the date certificate of incorporation or charter for Authority by the State the Corporation Commission. The successor of each member shall be appointed Board of Supervisors ~~ ~~ for a term of four years by the ( Board ) of the Count except that an Y of Roanoke, Virginia, Y person appointed to fill a vacancy shall se for the unexpired term, rve only ARTICLE IV The purposes for which the Authorit exercise all the Y Is created are to powers granted to the Authorit Water and Sewer Y under the Vir Authorities Act ginia Chapter 28, Title 15.1, Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended ("Act"). The estimates Inclusion of preliminary of ca Ital p costs, project proposals and rat services in the Articles of Incorporation is es for Impracticable. ARTICLE V The Authority shall serve the County of extent permitted b Roanoke, and, to the y the Act and by the to the Authority ma a rms °f such contracts as Y pprove, the Cities of Roanoke and Sale m. the 2 ~9-~ as the or private entities other public Vinton and such established Town of ine upon the terms and conditions determ Authority may to such contracts. finds that pursuant The Board hereby Sanitary Landfill Operation. available 3. services are not ivately-owned sanitary landfill i) pr t manner and (ii) operation by the ( cost-efficien landfill and any in a reasonable and a sanitary Resource Authority of in spite of Roanoke County such operation the contract for order to facilities or important in related effect, is anti-competitive a regional system any potential or operation of ment and/ for the County °f provide for the develop osal disp e and refuse collection and and the Town of Vinton of garbag of Salem and Roanoke, as the Roanoke, the Cities or private entities d such other governmental units an determine. shall take effect Authority may This resolution 4• Effective Immediately. immediately up°n its adoption. 3 r' ACTION NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE MEETING DATE: June 14, 1989 ITEM NUMBER ~1- C THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER SUBJECT: Appointments to Committees, Commissions and Boards COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATTn~t Board of Zonina Appeals Unexpired five-year term of Frank W. Martin, representing the Windsor Hills Magisterial District. His term will expire June 30, 1991. Five-year aterm of Neil W. Owen, representing the Cave Spring Magisterial District will expire June 30, 1989. Public Notices were placed advertising these vacancies. Four citizens expressed an interest and took applications. However, as of this date, none of the applications have been returned. Clean Valley Co_cil Two-year term of Richard Robers, honorary advisory member will expire June 30, 1989. Communit Corrections Resources Board One-year term of Edmund J. Kielty, Alternate. His term expired August 13, 1988. Fifth Plannin District Commission Three-year terms of Richard Robers elected representative, and John Hubbard, Citizen Representative and Executive Committee member will expire June 30, 1989. Mr. Hubbard does not wish to serve another term. Although Mr. Hubbard is on the County staff, this a Roanoke County citizen, and not necessarilpy on the staff only be a SI-(~ Landfill Citizens Advisory Committee Deborah Zamorski has r Cha eld roposed esbte n thel CavemSpring representing the Boones P P Magisterial District. Parks and Recreation Advisor Commission Three-year term of Alice Gillespie, Hollins Magisterial District will expire June 30, 1989. SUBMITTED BY: ~- Mary H. Allen Deputy Clerk APPROVED BY: Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator -------------------- --------------------- VOTE ACTION Yes No Abs Approved ( ) Motion by: Garrett Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred To: Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS A• COMpOSITION;(Su~arized from State Code 5.1- the Roanoke County Charter) 494 and To consist of five (5) members, a Supervisors. Their term of PPointed by the Board of APPointments to fill vacanciesfshall be onle for five portion of the term. Years. themselves. Members ma Y for the unexpired Y be reappointed to succeed B • DU_ TIES; (Summarized from State Code 15.1-495) To hear and decide a decision or determination PPeals from any order the administration or made by an administrativeeofficernin ordinance adopted enforcement of this article or of any original a Pursuant thereto. To authorize u terms of thepordinancelasswillanocases such varianceafromlthe interest, when owing to s t be contrary to the of the provisions will resuptcial conditions a literal enforpcement ~ that the spirit In unnecessar substantial ° f t h e o r d i n a n ce Y hardship; provided decisions justice done. To hear s ha 11 be observed and of the zoning administratornor a cide appeals from the exceptions. To hear and decide PPlications for special of the district aPPlications for interpretation location of map where there is any uncertainty as to the a district boundary, C• MEETING SCHEDULE: Third Wednesday of each month; Administrative Center at 7;30 held in the Roanoke County __ _ _ p.m. __ _ ___: --_____ -.---_ - ---.- ~•. ~. COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS RESOURCES BOARD A• COMPOSITION: To consist of seven membersaad Section 53.1-183) member from Roanoke Count PPointed as follows: members from the y% one member from Salem Cit one judges in the 23rd Judicial Districty~onermember from the Department of .Corrections. The term of office determined by the appointing authority (Roanoke Count 's ' year.) shall be Y is one B• DU_ TIEg; Review felony referrals from the Circuit Courts of Roanoke City, Roanoke diversion from state County and the City of Salem for penal system and local Possible C • jails . MEETINGS: Third Tuesday of each month at 4:00 p.m, ~~ FIFTH PLANNING DISTRICT COMMISSION A. COMPOSITION Commission to consist of five (5) representatives of Roanoke County based on' population, three representatives who shall be elected members of the governing bodies, and two members who shall be non-elected citizens. The term of office shall be three years. One of the members shall also serve on the Executive Committee . The Fifth Planning District Commission represents participating local governments included in the geographic area delineated by the Commonwealth of Virginia. The commission is composed of 21 elected and citizen representatives of the participating jurisdictions. B. DUTIES The purpose of the commission as defined by the Virginia ( Area Development Act is "...to promote orderly and efficient development of the physical, social and economic elements of the District by planning, encouraging and assisting governmental subdivisions to plan for the future.", The general management program category provides the basic organization and management of commission activities and routine administrative functions. Because general management supports the entire operation of the commission's work program, costs allocated to the program activity are generally considered ______ as administratiye_or indirect costs and charged to other program categories in~accordance with the Commission's Cost Allocation ..~~-_ Plan --_ .. -~. C. MEETING SCHEDULE Fourth Thursday of each month; held in Commission Conference Room, at 3:00 p.m. (time subject to change.) I ~ • ~~ ~r Fifth Plannin District Commission g 145 West Campbell Avenue P.O. Box 2569 Roanoke, Virginia 24010 " (703)343-4417 May 3, 1989 Ms. Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors P.0. Box 29800 Roanoke, Virginia 24018-0798 Dear Ms. Allen: According to our record of appointments, the term of Mr. John Hubbard, non-elected representative of Roanoke County on the Fifth Planning District Commission and Executive Committee, expires June 30, 1989. Mr. Hubbard was appointed by Roanoke County in May 1988 to fill the unexpired term of Mr. Timothy W. Gubala. The Commission Bylaws state that all appointments are for three-year terms. Mr. Hubbard is, of course, eligible for reappointment. Please notify the Commission of Roanoke County's official action in filling this upcoming vacancy on the Commission and Executive Committee. Thank you. Yours truly, Wayne Strickland Secretary to the Commission WGS: j }~ - _ __ --- ---°--- ~___ , Jr. , Chairman, SPDC - -- Mr: John-~#ittE~ ~_ Alleghany County • Botetourt County • Craig County • Roanoke County City of Clifton Forge • City of Covington • City of Roanoke • City of Salem • Town of Vinton • `~~ ~~ ~ ~ Fifth Planning District Commission 145 West Campbell Avenue P.O. Box 2569 Roanoke, Virginia 24010 - (703) 343417 '"'i"`- / May 3, 1989 Ms. Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors P.0. Box 29800 Roanoke, Virginia 24018-0798 Dear Ms. Allen: According to our record of appointments, the term of Mr. Richard Robers, elected representative of Roanoke County on the Fifth Planning District Commission and Executive Committee, expires June 30, 1989. The Commission Bylaws state that all appointments are for three-year terms. Mr. Robers is, of course, eligible for reappointment. Please notify the Commission of Roanoke County's official action in filling this upcoming vacancy on the Commission and Executive Committee. Thank you. Yours truly, ~^ ~. v Wayne G. Strickland Secretary to the Commission WGS:jIp cc: Mr.--Har_rp-__~-.-Walton, Jr. , Chairman, 5PDC -- Mr.- Rieh~~d=fte~ers Alleghany County • Botetourt County • Craig County • Roanoke County City of Clifton Forge • City of Covington • City of Roanoke • City of Salem • Town of Winton ;, ",:~.~ r A. s~- PARRS ~ RECREATION ADVISORY COMMISSION COMPOSITION: (Resolution 85-151.N, September 10, 1985) To be composed of .two (2) members from each magisterial district and one (1) member at large from the County. All members to be appointed by the Board of Supervisors. Original terms shall be staggered. Upon expiration of their original terms, each succeeding term shall be for three (3) years, expiring on June""30th. B. DUTIES: The Commission shall serve as the advisory body to the Director of Parks and Recreation of Roanoke County; the Commission shall suggest policies to the County Administrator and the Board of Supervisors through the Director of Parks and Recreation, within its powers and responsibilities as stated in this resolution. The Commission shall serve as a liaison between the Department of Parks and Recreation, the Board of Supervisors, and the citizens of the community. The Commission will work through the Parks and Recreation staff on all related matters. The Commission shall consult with and advise recreation policies, programs, personnel, finances, and the need for acquiring and disposing of lands and properties related to the total community recreation program, and to its long-range, projected program for ~" recreation. The Commission shall assume duties for the recreation purposes as follows: Make recommendations (1) for the establishment of a system of supervised recreation for the County; (2) to set apart for use as parks, playgrounds, recreation centers, water areas, or other recreation areas and structures, any lands or buildings owned by or leased to the County and for approval by the Board of Supervisors and may suggest improvements of such lands and for the construction and =--- - for--the-equ%ppng--and staffing of such buildings and structures -- - as-may- be n____ ~------to the recreation program within those funds ._ . --.-~_ allocated;-(3"T"-ah~~dvise in the acceptance by the County of any =~= =- grant; ~gf"t;"v~~~ or donation, any personal or real property offered-or -made=a~a=l able for recreation purposes and which it judges to be of present or possible future use or recreation. Any gift, bequest of money or other property, any grant, devise.. of real or personal property so acquired shall be held, by the County, used and finally disposed of in accordance with the terms under which such grant, gift or devise is made and accepted; (4) and advise in the construction, equipping, operation and maintenance of parks, playgrounds, recreation centers and all __-_ ___-_ _ buildings and structures necessary or useful to the Department function, and will advise in regard to other recreation facilities which are owned or controlled by the unit or leased or loaned to the unit. ACTION N0. ~~-~ ITEM NUMBER---~-- OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE BOARD ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING OF THE COUNTY AT A REGULAR HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA DATE: June 14, 1989 MEETIN Unit Advisory the Court Service Board to Services Advisory Appointments Family AGENDA ITEM: Council/Youth and ,S COMMENTS: COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: voted to continof Board of Supervisors Director 1988, Michael Lazzuri,of the Court the December 13' Dint new members. members Advisory On and app the present Services this Board has contacted Youth and Family Court Services Council/ continue serving• Service Unit Advisory wished to 1988. whether they will expire in Board to determine 1988 or by magisterial expired in not made for each terms committee are is listed The following t o this magisterial district Appointments the district; however Magisterial District, member Vinton not responded to Mr. James L. Trout, has Two-year term of 22~ 1989, Trout will expire March ~s letter. Magisterial Districbe Lazzuri Cave Spring would like to Ted R. Powell, Mr. Powell Two-Year term of 22~ 1989• expire March will will District, reappointed. Vinton Magisterial serve another Hoyt C• Rath, does not wish to Two-Year term 22f 1989. Mr. Rath expire March District Vinton Magisterial to be term. Archer, does not wish term of Dr. Andrew Dr . Archer Two-Year March 22, 1988. expired necessary to ointed• is High reapp listed above, it Spring appointments from Cave Byrd to the one each School, William run In addition oath members, Glenvar High appointments appoint four Y High School, that these made in Northside Lazzuri recommends appointment School, Mr• er. Therefore, High School. through Septemb from Septe~er 1989 will expire September 1, 1989. Thereafter all expire September 1, coinciding with the school year. SUBMITTED BY: Mary H. Allen Deputy Clerk ~~ terms will APPROVED BY: Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator -------------------------------- ACTION ----' Approved ( ) Motion by: VOTE Denied ( ) Yes No Abs Received ( ) Garrett Referred Johnson To: McGraw Nickens Robers 2 SERVICES UNIT ADVI A. TH AND ~- Amended 11/13/851to includelYouth2Members COMPOSITION Board to consist- of ten members, and one youth member from each high school. Governing bodies of each county and cit served by a court service unit ma a a citizen advisor y PPoint one or more members to at their discretioncouncil. Judges may appoint the tenth member B. DUT_ IES_ Advises and cooperates with the court upon all matters affecting the working of this law and other laws relating to children, their care and protection and to domestic relations. Consults and confer with the court and director of the court service unit relative to the development and extension of the court service program. Encourage the members selected by the council to serve on the central advisory council to visit as often as the member conveniently can, institutions and associations receiving children under this law and to report to the-court the conditions and surroundings of the children received by or in charge of an such persons, institutions or associations. The Council should make themselves familiar with the wort' of the court. Makes an k participatin annual report to the court and the g governing bodies on the work of the council. As the Youth and Famil Services Advisor Board; Establish goals and priorities for services; assist in coordination and County-wide youth youth services within the Planning for comprehensive capacit private sector. Serve in an advisory y and_to otherwise assist the Board of Supervisors to establish go~j~-~~d objectives in Standards of compliance with all "minimum - the--~=elinquency Prevention and Youth Development Act of 1979". Assnst-in conducting an assessment of the needs of youth every five years and to assist in develo in Delinquency Prevention Plan, further to participape in evaluatinl the implementation of the plan and making a report thereon to th Board of Supervisors. g about Provide a public forum where concerns youth may be expressed and to receive recommendations and raise concerns of public and private organizations at an re ul advisory board meeting upon proper notice. y g ar Advocates necessary legislative amendments to improve community conditions for development and to support the development of needed ser both youth public and private for youth in the community. vices C• MEETING SCHEDULE: One a quarter, the third Tuesda and place determined at meetings. y' beginning January; time '"' "` AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUN198AD1"IINISTRATION CENTER ON WEDNESDAY, JUNE 14, RESOLUTION N0. 614 15 APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM L - CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That that certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for June 14, 1989, designated as Item L - Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 8, inclusive, as follows: 1, Approval of Minutes - November 9, 1988 2, Resolution of Support for Edinburgh Square Foundamifundsretgoeconstructchousing2forrlow income Prog elderly persons. 3, Confirmation of Committee Appointments to the Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission. 4. Authorization to increase mileage reimbursement for use of personal vehicles while conducting county business. 5, Approval of salary increase for the County Administrator and County Attorney 6, Approval of Fireworks Permit for Hills Department Store. ~, Approval of Raffle Permit for Vinton Moose Lodge g. Authorization to execute indemnity agreement - Henry Acres Subdivision 2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this resolution. On motion of Supervisor Nickens with Items 6, and 7 removed for discussion, seconded by Supervisor Johnson, and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None Items 6 and 7 moved by Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor Garrett and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None A COPY TESTS: -~~ ~ /" Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors CC: File Diane Hyatt, Director of Finance Paul Mahoney, County Attorney November 9, 1988 L-/ 2 4 ~ Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Roanoke County Administration Center 3738 Brambleton Avenue, SW Roanoke, Virginia 24018 November 9, 1988 The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, met this day at the Roanoke County Administration Center, this being the second Wednesday, and the first regularly scheduled meeting of the month of November, 1988. IN RE: CALL TO ORDER Chairman Garrett called the meeting to order at 3:05 p.m. The roll call was taken. MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Lee Garrett, Vice Chairman Richard Robers, Supervisors Bob L. Johnson, Steven A. McGraw, Harry C. Nickens MEMBERS ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator; John M. Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator for Human Services; John R. Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator of Community Services and Development; Don M. Myers, Assistant County Administrator for Management Services; Paul M. Mahoney, L "` 2 ~ ~ ' November 9, 1988 County Attorney, Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk IN RE: OPENING CEREMONIES The invocation was given by the Reverend Arthur E. Grant. The Pledge of Allegiance was recited by all present. IN RE: REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS: Chairman Garrett announced that Item D-9, a report from the Mental Health Services of the Roanoke Valley has been postponed until November 22. County Administrator Elmer Hodge requested that a Raffle Permit request for Northside Junior High School be added to the Consent Resolution. IN RE: PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS AND AWARDS: 1 Proclamation declarinct the week of November 13-19 as AMERICAN EDUCATION WEEK: Chairman Garrett read the proclamation and it was presented to Bob Kenston, President of the Roanoke County Education Associatioan, Frank Thomas, chairman of the Roanoke County School board, and Bayes Wilson, School . L-I November 9, 1988 2 4 3 ~ Superintendent. Dr. Wilson thanked the Board of Supervisors and invited them to attend the schools during this week. Supervisor Johnson moved to adopt the proclamation. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Nickens and carried by a unanimous voice vote: IN RE: NEW BUSINESS 1. Resolution authorizing an agreement with the Va Department of Transportation and the City of Roanoke to construct a drainage facility on Nelms Lane• Director of Engineering, Phillip Henry advised that in July 1986, the Va. Department of Transportation submitted a set of preliminary plans and a proposed agreement for a drainage facility on Nelms Lane. The project originated because of the flooding in their area. The drainage improvements were added the Six Year Secondary Highway Construction Plan in 1986 with VDOT's 50~ share of the necessary costs added to the project. Roanoke County's drainage program will provide the County's 50~ share of the costs. Staff recommends that the County Administrator be authorized to enter into an agreement with VDOT and authorize cost participation. The funding could be considered as part of the FY 1989-90 drainage budget. 24 4 November 9, 1988 L-~ Mr. Hodge suggested that the people in the neighborhood be asked to participate in the costs of the project to insure that the funding is available if the drainage program is not included in the future budget. Supervisor Johnson advised he preferred that it remain a part of the drainage program. Supervisor Johnson moved to to approve the staff recommendation. The motion was seconded by Supervisor McGraw and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None RESOLUTION 11988-1 AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT WITH THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND THE CITY OF ROANOKE TO CONSTRUCT A DRAINAGE FACILITY ON NELMS LANE WHEREAS, the County of Roanoke, the Virginia Department of Transportation, and the City of Roanoke have recognized an unde- sirable drainage situation existing in the vicinity of the inter- section of Nelms Lane and Malvern Road in Roanoke County; and WHEREAS, the County of Roanoke, the Virginia Department of Transportation, and the City of Roanoke desire to participate in the improvement of this undesirable drainage situation and to establish responsibility for the cost of said improvements; and WHEREAS, the Virginia Department of Transportation has pre- pared plans for said improvement being project 80-0840-5607-008, Route 840, Nelms Lane; and ~-"/ 245 November 9, 1988 ~ WHEREAS, this project has been previously approved by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County and the Virginia Depart- ment of Transportation and was placed on the Six Year Secondary Road Construction Program; and WHEREAS, County staff has reviewed the proposed agreement and recommends approval thereof, subject to the limitations con- tained herein. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the County Administrator is authorized to enter into an agreement with the Virginia Department of Transportation and the City of Roanoke to construct project 80-0840-5607-008, Route 840, Nelms Lane, upon approval as to form by the County Attorney. 2. That Roanoke County agrees to pay one-half of the total project expense from the anticipated Drainage Program budget for fiscal year 1989-1990; however this agreement is subject to and contingent upon a future appropriation for this program budget by the Board of Supervisors for fiscal year 1989-1990. 3. That Roanoke County agrees to pay one half of the total project expense incurred by the Virginia Department of Transporta- tion from the Secondary Road Improvement Funds allocated to Roa- poke County's Secondary Road-System. 246 ~~~ A November 9, 1988 __ 4. That the Board hereby amends its Drainage Program prior- ity list to accommodate this project, and agrees to amend the priority program for the expenditure of funds for the six-year plan for improvements to the secondary road system of the County to accommodate this project. 5. That the County Administrator is directed to forward a certified copy of this resolution to the Virginia Department of Transportation Commissioner, Ray D. Pethtel, and the Resident Engineer, F. C. Altizer. On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor McGraw and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, McGraw, Nickens, Robers, Garrett NAYS: None 2 Resolution authorizing the donation of a house to the Rack CrPPk volunteer fire ComDanv: Fire and Rescue Chief Tommy Fuqua reported that the property purchased for the Back Creek Fire Station also includes a house. There have been no bids received when the house was advertised for sale because the house must be moved. The volunteer fire company has requested that the house be donated to them and they will dispose of the house, with any funds received applied to the station construction cost. Staff recommends that the house be donated to the Back Creek Volunteer Fire Company with removal required by November 9, 1988 L- J 247, December 15, 1988, and funds received applied to the station construction costs. In response to a question from Supervisor Garrett, Mr. Fuqua stated they had tried to find a use for the house but did not feel it was feasible to use because of the cost to renovate. Supervisor Garrett moved to approve the staff recommendation. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Robers and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None RESOLUTION 11988-2 SUPPORTING THE DONATION OF A HOUSE TO BACK CREEK VOLUNTEER FIRE COMPANY WHEREAS, property purchased by Roanoke County for the construction of a Back Creek Fire Station includes a house; and WHEREAS, County staff has determined that the house cannot be utilized and that it must be moved or demolished to allow construction of the fire station; and WHEREAS, County's Procurement Department has advertised the house for sale; and WHEREAS, no bids were received due to the excessive costs associated with moving the house; and WHEREAS, the Back Creek Volunteer Fire Company has requested that the County donate the house to them for demolition. 248 November 9, 1988 ~- r NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that said Board supports the donation of the house to the Back Creek Volunteer Fire Company for demolition thereof on or before December 15, 1988. On motion of Supervisor Garrett, seconded by Supervisor Robers and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, McGraw, Nickens, Robers, Garrett NAYS: None 3. Request by Jerry W. Grubb for waiver of the Provisions in the County Water Ordinance: Utility Director Clifford Craig reported that Mr. Grubb had purchased a lot in the Stonewood Subdivision for his personal residence. The subdivision was approved for water and sewer to be provided by on-lot systems. Mr. Grubb has applied for water service to his lot by a lateral through a private easement to the public water line on Standford Drive. This would not comply with the county ordinance and his request was denied. Mr. Grubb is now asking for a waiver of the ordinance to permit him to extend water to his lot. Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors not waive the water ordinance since Mr. Grubb could provide water with a private well. Supervisor McGraw moved to to approve the staff recommendation and deny the waiver. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Johnson and carried by the following recorded vote: ~-r 249 November 9, 1988 AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None 4 Cancellation of the December 27 1988 meeting and scheduling of the Organizational Meeting in 1989• Supervisor Nickens moved to to adopt a resolution. canceling the December 27th meeting and setting the organizational meeting for 1989. The motion was seconded by Supervisor McGraw and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None RESOLUTION 11988-4 CANCELING A REGULAR MEETING IN DECEMBER AND SCHEDULING THE ORGANIZATIONAL MEETING WHEREAS, by Resolution R1488-2 adopted on January 4, 1988, the Board of Supervisors established a regular meeting sche- Jule for the Board for calendar year 1988; and WHEREAS, in order to accommodate the public business and the convenience of the citizens as it relates to the holidays in December and January, this meeting schedule is hereby amended. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the Board of Supervi- sors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That Resolution R1488-2 establishing a certain regu- lar meeting schedule for the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors is hereby amended by canceling the meeting scheduled for December 27, 1988; and 2 5 0 ~-' ~ November 9, 1988 2. That any public hearing which would have been sche- duled and heard on December 27, 1988, shall be held at 7:00 p.m. on Tuesday, December 13, 1988, at the Roanoke County Administra- tion Center at 3738 Brambleton Avenue; and 3. That the annual organizational meeting for 1989 for the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors is hereby scheduled for Wednesday, January 4, 1989, at 9:00 a.m. at the Roanoke County Administration Center at 3738 Brambleton Avenue. 4. That the County Administrator shall cause a copy of this Resolution to be posted at the Courthouse, the Roanoke County Administration Center, and each County library, and advertised in the Roanoke Times and World News on November 22, 1988 and November 29, 1988. On motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by Supervisor McGraw and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, McGraw, Nickens, Robers, Garrett NAYS: None 5 Authorization to expend funds on Bushdale Road: Engineering Director Phillip Henry explained that Bushdale Road is a private road serving five families that has become impassable during winter months in past years. It has been included on the rural additional priority list but very little has been done toward taking it in to the State System. Staff is - --. November 9, 1988 L-~ ?51 requesting an allocation of $1,000 to minimally maintain the road if it again becomes impassable. Supervisor McGraw expressed concern that this would be setting a precedent for other roads in similar circumstances. Supervisor Nickens pointed out only seven roads listed on the rural addition priority listing could require this type of maintenance. Supervisor Nickens moved to approve the staff recommendation. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Johnson. Supervisor McGraw felt that the other six roads should also be included for maintenance as necessary. Supervisor Nickens agreed to amend the motion to include emergency work for the other six roads if they become impassable. Supervisor Nickens moved to approve the staff recommendation amended to fund the other six roads included in the 1987-88 Rural Addition Priority Listing if emergency conditions exist with funding not to exceed $1,000. If the funds necessary exceed $1,000, the matter will be brought back to the Board. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Johnson and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None RESOLUTION 11 8 - AUTHORIZING THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS - BUSHDALE ROAD, AS AMENDED 2 5 2 ~ November 9, 1988 ~~ WHEREAS, Bushdale Road is a private road located in the Vinton Magisterial District of Roanoke County; and WHEREAS, due to the age and economic status of the pro- perty owners on Bushdale Road, the road has deteriorated and be- come impassable in past years during the winter months; and WHEREAS, the property owners on Bushdale Road have peti- tinned to have the road accepted into the State Secondary System through the rural additions program; and WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Engineering Department has designated road bond projects as its number one priority in order to meet the deadline of expenditure of the Road Bond funds by July 1, 1989, thus making the rural addition a lesser priority; and WHEREAS, engineering staff has recently inspected Bush- dale Road and determined the road to be in satisfactory condition with adequate access to all property owners; and WHEREAS, based on prior years it is reasonable to assume that Bushdale Road may deteriorate and become impassable during the winter months; and WHEREAS, Roanoke County does not maintain private roads therefore any emergency repair or maintenance of Bushdale Road by Roanoke County would be undertaken in order to provide for the health, safety, and welfare of its citizens; and November 9, 1988 ~"' r 25 3 WHEREAS, there are no specific funds allocated in the Roanoke County budget for private road maintenance; and WHEREAS, any monies expended for the maintenance of Bushdale Road would have to be allocated from the Board contin- gency account. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervi- sors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that said Board supports the expenditure of County funds for any emergency repairs or mainten- ance of Bushdale Road or any of the seven roads listed on the 87/88 rural addition priority list, due to the possible deterioration of the road during the winter months; that the County Engineer or his designee shall make such inspections necessary to determine if emergency repairs or maintenance are needed; and that if such repairs to Bushdale Road are necessary, the expenditure of funds from the Board contingency account in an amount not to exceed One Thousand ($1,000) Dollars to accomplish this purpose for Bushdale Road is hereby authorized. On motion of Supervisor Nickens, amended to include the seven roads listed on the 87/88 rural addition priority listing, seconded by Supervisor McGraw and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, McGraw, Nickens, Robers, Garrett NAYS: None 25 4 November 9, 1988 L- I 6. Inclusion of Additional Roads into the Rural Addition Pro rq am: Fred Altizer, Virginia Department of Transportation explained that the Board of Supervisors determines what roads are added to the list. He outlined the procedure for prioritization. In response to a question from Supervisor Johnson, Mr. Henry advised the County did not have estimated figures on the costs for each road. He advised that all projects on the current list will be more than $50,000. Supervisor McGraw moved to adopt the priority list. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Robers. Supervisor Nickens and Johnson expressed concern that by listing these roads, the county will raise false hopes to the citizens since there is no time frame for completion, and it will probably take two to three years for completion. Supervisor Johnson requested a realistic time frame for these road improvements so the citizens are aware of how long the process may take. Supervisor Johnson moved to postpone for 30 days for staff to work on a process for establishing priorities. The motion was seconded by Supervisor McGraw and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None November 9, 1988 L-/ 25 5 7. Appropriation for Dixie Caverns Removal Protect: Mr. Craig reported that the quantity of contaminated material was much greater than was planned when the budget was set up. Exact figures are still not available, but staff is requesting an additional $260,000 for the removal project. When estimated costs to remove the additional material are complete, staff will request an additional appropriation. Total funding as of this date are $1,117,000. Supervisor McGraw moved to approve the funding request. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Garrett and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None 8. Report from Sheriff Kavanaugh regardinc scheduling chances: Sheriff Kavanaugh advised that he has made changes to the schedule which will take place in January 1989 to add more manpower at specific times such as late evening and early morning hours and on weekends. The new system will allow for three 10-man platoons working four 10-hour days with a three-day break. This will allow overlap of platoons at certain times between platoons. There will also be a change from six districts to nine districts. It will be necessary to upgrade two positions and request two new positions during the budget process. L-~ 2 5 6 November 9, 1988 In response to a question from Supervisor Johnson, Sheriff Kavanaugh advised that the districts were determined by the sergeants and officers on the road based on their experiences and response time. IN RE: REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS 1 Rectuest for Work Session to review Emulovee Handbook: Supervisor Johnson moved to set the work session for November 22, 1989. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Nickens and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None IN RE: FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 1 Ordinance acceptincr an offer for and authorizinct he sale of .55 acre more or less in the Southwest Industrial Park: County Attorney Paul Mahoney reviewed the proposed ordinance. No one was present to speak to the ordinance. Supervisor Nickens moved to approve first reading of the ordinance. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Johnson and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None November 9, 1988 2_: Ordinance acc~ting an offer for and authorizing ~~ 1 25 7 the sale of two acres, ore or less, in the Southwest Industrial Park: Economic Development Specialist Brian Duncan reported that Insulation Systems is interested in locating in the park. It will create 10 jobs the first year. There will be a 20,000 square foot distribution and factory facility at the park. The sale is $50,000 with tax revenue estimated at $7,000. Supervisor Johnson requested that the staff report on the remaining acreage and the costs associated with the park. Mr. Duncan responded there are nine acres left, with three reserved for a rail site. Mr. Duncan will report back with the other information. Supervisor Robers moved to approve first reading of the ordinance. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Johnson and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None 3 Ordinance acceptincr an offer for and authorizing the sale and conveyance of surplus real estate - well lot Glen Forest: Mr. Mahoney advised that the County had received an offer for this well lot and the proceeds will be allocated to the capital improvement fund. 25 8 ~-~ November 9, 1988 Supervisor Robers moved to approve first reading. The motion was seconded by Supervisor McGraw and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None 4 Ordinance establishing certain procedures for financing of local public works improvements, authorizing the assessment upon abuttinq_property owners, providing for notice thereof, objections and appeals, pursuant to the statues for such rises made and provided: Mr. Mahoney reported that this ordinance establishes the procedures of the policy to finance local public works improvements through assessments on abutting property owners. The policy was approved by the Board on October 11, 1988. The ordinance addresses the legal procedures based on several alternatives which include 100 agreement by all affected property owners, petitions of 60$ of affected landowners, by vote of two-thirds of the Board or by creation of a special district authorized by the Charter. Each specific project would require a specific ordinance identifying amounts, interest rates, and other requirements of each project. Most of the procedures in the draft ordinance are taken from the state code requirements. Supervisor Nickens expressed concern that a committee of only two members would determine the costs of the improvements. November 9, 1988 Mr. Mahoney responded that this is the initial administrative review, but the board may expand upon the committee. L-( 25 g Concern was also expressed about the percentage of 600 agreement rather than 75~ as necessary for road improvements. Supervisor McGraw moved to to approve first reading of the ordinance amended that 75~ of the residents must petition for improvements rather than 60~. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Garrett and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None ~ Ordinance amending and reenactin~pter 10, Licenses, and Providing for a permit fee for Solicitor's Permits• Mr. Mahoney advised that the County Attorney's Office and Commissioner of Revenue's Office had been working on this ordinance for several years. A second reading and public hearing will be held November 22nd. The Board requested that staff attempt to notify specific categories of groups who would be affected by this ordinance and the County Attorney's office sent letters to approximately 15 groups. Supervisor Nickens asked why the tax rates were not consistent in some cases. Mr. Mahoney advised that the ordinance is based on state law and has not been amended in ten years. Their goal was to not raise existing rates but to keep them at 26 0 November 9, 1988 the same levels, but the Board could change the rates if they desired. Supervisor Nickens moved to to approve the first reading with the ordinance amended to lower the commission merchant tax from $.36/$100 of gross receipts to $.34 and asked L- Marsha Compton from the Commissioner of Revenue's Office to bring back to the second reading the financial implications of any changes to the tax rate. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Johnson and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None IN RE: SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1 Ordinance amendinct and reenactinct Chapter 5, Animals and Fowls of the Roanoke Countv code by the addition of Section 5-71, Quarantine in event of Animal Bites: Mr. Mahoney reported this ordinance provides that an animal which has bitten a person shall be confined on observation for ten days and further provides that a seriously injured or sick animal may be euthanized and its head evaluated by the proper agency. Supervisor McGraw expressed concern that the ordinance does not address whether vicious animals may be euthanized or detained. Mr. Mahoney advised he would discuss this with the November 9, 1988 L- ~ 261 Chief Animal Control Officer to see if an ordinance is needed to address this problem. Supervisor Nickens moved to to approve the ordinance. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Robers and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None ORDINANCE 11988-7 AMENDING AND REENACTING CHAPTER 5, ANIMALS AND FOWLS OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE BY THE ADDITION OF SECTION 5-71, QUARANTINE IN EVENT OF ANIMAL BITES WHEREAS, by Chapter 488, 1987 Virginia Acts of the Assembly, Section 3.1-796.98 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, was amended to provide that at the discretion of the director of the local health department any animal which has bitten a person shall be confined under competent observation for ten (10) days, unless the animal develops active symptoms of rabies or expires before that time; and WHEREAS, by the same chapter and section, a seriously injured or sick animal may be humanely euthanized as provided in Section 3.1-796.96 of the Code of Virginia and its head sent to the Division of Consolidated Laboratory Services of the Depart- ment of General Services, or the local health department, for evaluation; and 26 2 November 9, 1988 z-- / WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on October 25, 1988; and the second reading of this ordinance was held on November 9, 1988. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That Chapter 5, Animals and Fowls, of the Roanoke County Code be amended and reenacted by the addition of the fol- lowing section: Sec 5 71 Quarantine in event of animal bites. At the discretion of the director of a local health department, any animal which has bitten a person shall be confined under competent observation for ten (10) days, unless the animal develops active symptoms of rabies or expires before that time A seriously inured or sick animal may be humanely euthanized as provided in Section 3 1-796 96 of the Code of Vir inia and its head sent to the Division of Consolidated Laboratory Services of the Department of General Services, or the local health department, for evaluation. 2. The sections, paragraphs, sentences, and clauses of this chapter are severable, and if any phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph, or section of this chapter shall be declared unconstitutional or invalid by the valid judgment or decree of a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining phrases, clauses, November 9,.1988 ~. ~- / 263 sentences, paragraphs, and sections of this chapter shall remain valid. 3. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after December 1, 1988. On motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by Supervisor Robers and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, McGraw, Nickens, Robers, Garrett NAYS: None IN RE: APPOINTMENTS 1, Building Code Board of Adjustments and Appeals: Supervisor Johnson nominated Robert Allen Williamson to a four year term. 2. Grievance Panel: Supervisor Nickens nominated the reappointment of Cecil Hill to another three-year term. 3, Library Board: Supervisor Nickens nominated the reappointment of Carolyn Pence to another four-year term. 4. Mental Health Services of the Roanoke Valley Board Qf Directors: Supervisor Garrett nominated the reappointment of Dr. Joseph Duetsch to another three-year term. 5. Planning Commission: Supervisor Garrett nominated Michael Gordon to another four-year term. 264 November 9, 1988 ~; REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS Supervisor Johnson requested that a resolution of ~~( support for a regional work farm in cooperation with other localities and the Fifth Planning District Commission be brought to the November 22 meeting. Supervisor McGraw announced that the Grayson Commission will meet on November 18 in Richmond and will receive the VACO/VML proposal. IN RE: CONSENT AGENDA Supervisor Johnson moved to approve the Consent Agenda with Item 8 added. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Nickens and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None RESOLUTION N0. 11988-8 APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM K - CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That that certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for November 9, 1988, designated as Item K - ~-( November 9, 1988 ~ 6 5 __ --_ Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 7, inclusive, as follows: 1. Minutes of Meeting - June 28, 1988 2. Approval of a raffle Permit for the Bent Mountain Woman's Club. 3. Acknowledgment of the following roads into the VDOT Secondary System. a. 0.14 miles of Orchard Valley Circle b. 0.09 miles of Meadow Valley Circle c. 0.08 Miles of Woodmont Drive d. 0.37 miles of Commonwealth Drive 4. Request for acceptance of Buckland Mill Road and Copper Circle into the VDOT Secondary System. 5. Request for acceptance of Bear Ridge Circle into the VDOT Secondary System. 6. Request for acceptance of 0.17 miles of Highfields Farm Drive into the VDOT Secondary System. 7. Acceptance of sewer facilities serving Wright Insurance Agency. 8. Approval of a Raffle Permit for Northside Junior High School PTA. 2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this resolution. On motion of Supervisor Johnson, with Item K-8 added, seconded by Supervisor Nickens, and the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens Garrett 26 6 November 9, 1988 ~~r NAYS: None RESOLUTION 11988-8.d REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF BEAR RIDGE CIRCLE INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That this matter came this day to be heard upon the proceedings herein, and upon the application of Bear Ridge Circle from its intersection with Warwood Drive (Route 1336) to the terminus at the cul-de-sac for a distance of 0.06 miles, to be accepted and made a part of the Secondary System of State Highways under Section 33.1-229 of the Virginia State Code. 2. That it appears to the Board that drainage easements and a fifty (50) foot right-of-way for said road have been dedicated by virtue of a certain map known as Meadow Creek, Section 3 Subdivision which map was recorded in Plat Book 9, Page 320, of the records of the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, on May 2, 1985 and that by reason of the recordation of said map no report from a Board of Viewers, nor consent or donation of right-of-way from the abutting property owners is necessary. The Board hereby guarantees said right-of-way for drainage. 3. That said road known as Bear Ridge Circle and which is shown on a certain sketch accompanying this Resolution, be, and C -~ 26 7 November 9, 1988 the same is hereby established as public road to become a part of the State Secondary System of Highways in Roanoke County, only from and after notification of official acceptance of said street or highway by the Virginia Department of Transportation. On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor Nickens and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, McGraw, Nickens, Robers, Garrett NAYS: None RESOLUTION 11988-8.e REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF HIGHFIELDS FARM DRIVE, FROM ITS INTERSECTION WITH HIGHFIELDS FARM CIRCLE TO THE CUL-DE-SAC, INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That this matter came this day to be heard upon the proceedings herein, and upon the application of Highfields Farm Drive, from its intersection with Highfields Farm Circle to the cul-de-sac, to be accepted and made a part of the Secondary System of State Highways under Section 33.1-229 of the Virginia State Code. 2. That it appears to the Board that drainage easements and a fifty (50) foot right-of-way for said road have been dedicated by virtue of a certain map/maps known as Highfields Farm Estates, Section Three Subdivision which map was recorded in L- / ~6 8 November 9, 1988 Plat Book 10, Page 45, of the records of the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, on February 24, 1987 and that by reason of the recordation of said map no report from a Board of Viewers, nor consent or donation of right-of-way from the abutting property owners is necessary. The Board hereby guarantees said right-of-way for drainage. 3. That said road known as Highfields Farm Drive, from its intersection with Highfields Farm Circle to the cul-de-sac and which is shown on a certain sketch accompanying this Resolution, be, and the same is hereby established as public road to become a part of the State Secondary System of Highways in Roanoke County, only from and after notification of official acceptance of said street or highway by the Virginia Department of Transportation. On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor Nickens and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, McGraw, Nickens, Robers, Garrett NAYS: None IN RE: REPORTS Supervisor Nickens moved to receive and file the following reports. The motion was seconded by Supervisor McGraw and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett November 9, 1988 NAYS: None 1. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance 2. General Fund Unappropriated Balance 3. Board Contingency Fund IN RE: CITIZENS COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS L-~ 26 g Charles Landis, 5268 Glenvar Heights Boulevard, spoke in opposition to the consolidation of Roanoke City and Roanoke County and requested that the area west of Salem be allowed to consolidate with the City of Salem if consolidation takes place. IN RE: WORK SESSION 1. Street Standards: Director of Development and Inspections Arnold Covey outlined the changes made to the proposed street standards. Standards have been strengthened in urban areas, but left the standards in the rural areas the same. A section was added for areas outside the urban area which would require curb and gutters when minimuim lot frontage is less than 100 feet. Members of the Homebuilders Association were present to express their concerns and Fred Altizer, Virginia Department of Transportation was present-to answer questions. Zoo November 9, 1988 ~_ r Mr. Hodge explained that residents have complained about the difference in streets between Roanoke County and the cities based on the standards. The Homebuilders Association felt that curb and gutter was not always necessary on every road within a subdivision. The staff felt that all roads in a subdivision should be consistent. The Homebuilders Association also were concerned that the price of houses would escalate because of the stricter standards. Mr. Hodge advised that the staff would continue to work with the Homebuilders Association to address their concerns and would go forward with the necessary public hearing. IN RE: EXECUTIVE SESSION At 5:50 p.m., Supervisor Garrett moved to go into Executive Session pursuant to the Code of Virginia Section 2.1- 344 (a) (2) to discuss a real estate matter (Cave Spring Rescue Squad). The motion was seconded by Supervisor Johnson and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None IN RE: OPEN SESSION At 6:22 p.m., Supervisor Robers moved to return to Open Session. The motion was seconded by Supervisor McGraw and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None IN RE: ADJOURNMENT Chairman Garrett adjourned the meeting at 6:23 p.m. Lee Garrett, Chairman ~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOROANOKESCOUNTYSADMINISTRATOION COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE JUNE 14, 1989 CENTER ON WEDNESDAY, RESOLUTION 61489_TION FOR FUNDS FROM UT HE SQUARE'S APPLICA DEPARTMENT OF LNSTRUCOT HOUSING F~ R LOW DEVELOPMENT TO CO INCOME ELDERLY there exists in the Roanoke Valley a need for WHEREAS, and additional housing for the low income elderly; WHEREAS, Edinburgh Square Foundation has helped to meet that roviding a facility that has been need since October, 1986, p occu ied since that time, and presently has a waiting list fully P of 92 persons; and onsors, the WHEREAS, Edinburgh Square Foundation and its sp ue of Older Americans and the Odd Fellows Mountain Dale Lodge Leag 1 for funds through the Department of Housing #49, desire to app Y ram for and Urban Development under Section 202 Direct Loan Prog resent Housing for the Elderly to construct an addition to their p facility; and would WHEREAS, this proposed addition, Edinburgh Greens, ide 27 regular one-bedroom apartments, 3 handicapped prow ne-bedroom apartments, 9 regular studio apartments and need for low handicapped studio apartment to meet the growing income elderly housing. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of noke County, Virginia, strongly endorses the proposed addition Roa to Edinburgh Square; and FURTHER, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, inia, supports their application for funds from the Virg d Urban Development to construct this Department of Housing an seconded by Supervisor facility. of Supervisor Nickens- On motion and carried by the following recorded vote: Johnson McGraw, Nickens, Garrett Supervisors Johnson, Robers, AYES NAYS : None A COPY TESTE: ~° Deputy Clerk Mary H. Allen, ervisors Roanoke County Board of Sup cc: File h Square Foundation ment Edinburg and Urban Develop Department of Housing ACTION N0. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE MEETING DATE: June 14, 1989 ITEM NUMBER L'- THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER AGENDA ITEM: Approval of Resolution supporting Edinburgh Square's funding request to the Department of Housing and Urban Development for Section 202 Direct Loans to construct housing for the elderly COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~Lc.~a~rx-y,~ ~0 SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Edinburgh Square Foundation opened on October 1, 1986 and provides housing for low income elderl operated at 100$ occupancy rate since theipeopening and ehaveava waiting list of 92 low income persons at the present. The Department of Housing and Urban Development recently announced availability of funds under Section 202 Direct Loan Program for housing for the elderly. Edinburgh Square Foundation, the League of Older Americans and the Odd Fellows Mountain Dale Lodge #49 plan to apply for the these funds to construct an addition to the present facility. The addition will be named Edinburgh Greens and will consist of 40 apartments. Attached is further information on the proposed addition. Edinburgh Square has requested that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors adopt a resolution supporting their request for funding. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisor adopt the attached resolution supporting Edinburgh Square Foundation's request for The Department of Housing and Urban Development funding for a 40 apartment addition to their facility. SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: Mary H. Allen Deputy Clerk ~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ~. -° ------------ ACTION -------------------------- Approved ( ) Motion by: VOTE Denied ( ) Yes No Abs Received ( ) Garrett Referred Johnson To• McGraw Nickens Robers ~~~ ~~ ~~uN~rnoN Ep1NBtJR~ 8 ^ Roanoke, VA 24012 ^ (703) 366-1888 129 Hershberger Road N.W ~y 25, 1989 L- ~ May Allen ~~ of c/o Roanoke County Supervisors p• O, Box 29800 24018 Roanoke, Virginia Dear Ms. Allen, Urban Development announced artment of Housing and program for Housing On May 12, 1989 The DeP Section 202 Direct Iran of funds under the an availability The League of Older for the Elderly. s onsors, Foundation, along with oure #49, have chosen to apply for Dale I~odg for low income Persons Edinburgh Sure the Odd Fellows 1"Io~ta for more housing 1986 p~nericans and funds . The need ancY on October 1. ened at 100% occup l.ntaining a lengthy the above meneri ~i,nburgh Sure oP while also ma was proven ~ to re~~ at 100% occupancy' We have continued rsons. list of 92 low income Pe h Greens. It will be an waiting will be Ed~burg one-bedrooms, ro osed addition 3 handicapped The The name of the pnI? (27 regular one-bedrooms, ding structure. 40 aPartme dicapped studio) to the stan Edsxiburgh addition of han the north enh qu~e and ~clude g regular studios, and 1 situated on gdinburg five stories high, lar to those of rab bars addition will ~~ents will be s,m~ blinds, electric heat P~s~ g Square. The ap mini wall to wall carps for any emergency. the following= and emergency ow from experience ~ the bathroom o elation and We ~ thus, ride in our elderly P P ~ dependent longer We take so much P solder people Tema care• We ask that you e of housing help for institutional a resolution that this tYP reventing the need b developing delaying and/°r P more of this type of housing Y assist us in providing eting• of support at your June 14th me ~" e to callrrie at the above number if You have anY Please do not hesitat questions. Sincerely, Joan D• Thibodeau Manager JDT/bwl cc: Richard Young, nt Manager Business Developr~ file ITEM NO . ~"° AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JUNE 14, 1989 RESOLUTION SUPPORTING EDINBURGH SQUARE'S APPLICATION FOR FUNDS FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF LOW HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT TO CONSTRUCT HOUSING FOR LOW INCOME ELDERLY WHEREAS, there exists in the Roanoke Valley a need for additional housing for the low income elderly; and WHEREAS, Edinburgh Square Foundation has helped to meet that need since October, 1986, providing a facility that has been fully occupied since that time, and presently has a waiting list of 92 persons; and WHEREAS, Edinburgh Square Foundation and its sponsors, the League of Older Americans and the Odd Fe #49, desire to apply for funds through and Urban Development under Section 202 Housing for the Elderly to construct an facility; and WHEREAS, this proposed addition, flows Mountain Dale Lodge the Department of Housing Direct Loan Program for addition to their present Edinburgh Greens, would provide 27 regular one-bedroom apartments, 3 handicapped one-bedroom apartments, 9 regular studio apartments and 1 handicapped studio apartment to meet the growing need for low income elderly housing. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, strongly endorses the proposed addition to Edinburgh Square; and FURTHER, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, supports their application for funds from the Department of Housing and Urban Development to construct this facility. ACTION NO.A-61489-15.b ITEM NUMBER"`=? OF SUPERVISORS OF ROp,NOKE MEETING OF THE BOARD T ps REGULAR THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTE A VIRGINIA HELD AT COUNTY, MEETING DATE: June 14, 1989 ointments to the Parks Confirmation of Committee APP AGENDA ITEM: Commission and Recreation Advisory COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION' 1989 meeting nominations were made at the MaY 23, The following and must now be confirmed- v __,.~;~n Supervisor Robers District Magisterial June 30, 199 2. Supervisor Nickens rict Magisterial D on June 30, 992 SUBMITTED BY: dvisot ~~••~••-- ring Vince Joyce, Cave SP has nominated ear term which will expire to another three-y Thomas Robertson, Vinton has nominated ear term which will expire to another three-y H Allen APPROVED BY: Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator Mary _----------- Deputy Clerk ------------------------- ----------- VOTE Abs --------------------ACTION Yes No Harr C. Nickens Garrett x_ Approved (x) Motion by: Johnson x Denied ( ) Bob L. Johnson x McGraw Received ( ) Nickens x - _ Referred Robers x - To:~ cc: File Commission File Parks & Recreation Advisory ACTION NTJMBER A_ 6~ -15.c °. ITEM NUMBER MEETING OF THE BOARD OF NTYEADMINISTRATIONNCENTER AT A REGULAR COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE CO MEETING DATE: June 14, 1989 A royal of Salary Increase for County AGENDA ITEM: PP Attorney Administrator and County COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: recently in Executive Session The Board of Supervisors met Administraroximate increases for the County roved an app to discuss salary the Board app Attorney. At that time, Hodge, County Administrator, County roved a 9.6$ 5$ salary increase for Elmer C• The Board also aPP increasing his salary to $82,500• County Attorney, increasing Mahoney, salary increase far Paul M• his salary to $68,500. RECOMMENDATION: ervisors to approve the for the Board of SuP County Administrator, It is necessary for Elmer C. Hodge, rove t'ne salary salary increase to $82,500; and to app to $68,500 his salary increasing his salary increasing Mahoney, increase for Paul M• en session. for Fiscal Year 1989-90 in op APPROVED BY: ter.°" fr"' ~y, Lee Garrett Cha rman --------------------------- ----------------------- VOTE ---'------------ ACTION No Yes Abs Harry C. Nickens/ x p,pproved (x) Motion by: Garrett Bob L. Johnson Johnson x Denied ( ) x Received ( ) McGraw Nickens x Referred Robers x To~_ ------ cc: File County Administrator Elmer Rodger County Attorney Paul Mahoney• Director, Human Resources D, Keith Cook, L-`} AT A REGULAR MEETING OF TIC BOARD OF SUPERVIS~INISTRATION COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HEIR AT THE ROANO~E 1C~T1989 CEO ON WEDNESDAY, RESOLUTION 61489-15.d AMENDING RESOLUTION 82388-6 AI,Lpy,7~ MILEAGE RE~gURSEMENT FOR MI SA~~ THE USE OF A PERSONAL VEHICLE FOR COUN'T'Y OLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, BE IT RES as follows: lggg, allowing mileage 1. That Resolution 82388-6 adopted August 26, County ursement for the use of personal vehicles while conducting reimb r mile 'ness be, and hereby is, amended to provide a reimbursement of 24G pe buss t 15,000 miles and 11~ per mile for all miles over the firs for the firs 15,000 miles; and That this rate shall be in full force and effect for mileage 2. 1989. expenses incurred from and after June 14, Supervisor Johnson and On motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by carried by the following recorded vote: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw. Nickens, Garrett AYES: NAYS: None A CpPY TESTE: ,J°~ _ Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Finance Diane Hyatt, Director, Reta Busher, Director, ~gement & Budget Assistant County Administrators impartment Heads Constitutional Officers ^; ACTION # ITEM NUMBER ~"! AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: June 14, 1989 AGENDA ITEM: Mileage reimbursement for use of personal vehicles while conducting County business. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: '~ _ BACKGROUND: The County of Roanoke currently allows mileage reimbursement for the use of personal vehicles while conducting County business at a rate of 22.5G per mile for the first 15,000 miles, and 11~ per mile for all miles over the first 15,000. This mileage reimbursement was established to be consistent with the mileage reimbursement policy of the Commonwealth of Virginia. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Commonwealth of Virginia has revised its reimbursement rate for personal vehicle mileage to 24G per mile for the first 15,000 miles, and 11~ per mile for all miles over the first 15,000. The staff would like to increase the County mileage reimbursement to be consistent with the Commonwealth of Virginia. ALTERNATIVES AND IMPACTS: 1. Adopt the attached resolution revising the County reimbursement for the use of personal vehicles while conducting County business to 24~ per mile for the first 15,000 miles, and 11~ per mile for all miles over the first 15,000 miles. 2. Do not change the current mileage reimbursement rate. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The staff recommends Alternative 1. C~2~ Diane D. Hyatt Elmer C. Hodg Director of Finance County Administrator L-~ ------------------------------------------------------------------ Approved ( ) Denied ( > Received ( ) Referred To Motion by: ACTION Garrett Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers VOTE No Yes Abs AT A REGULAR MEETING OF 'THE BOA OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE ~~'1', VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE ~ '' , CENTER ON TUESDAY, JUNE 14~ 8 `~M~ISTRATION `""" ~~ RESOLUTION AMENDING SOLUTION 82388-6 ALLOWING MILEAG REE IMBURS~T FOR MILEAGE TN THE USE OF A PERSONAL VEHICLE FOR COiJNTy BUSINESS BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia as follows; 1• That Resolution 82388-6 adopted August 26, 1988, allowing milea reimbursement for the use of ge personal vehicles while conducting County business be, and hereby is, amended to provide a reimbursement of 24~ for the first 15,000 miles and 11~ per mile for all miles over that mile 15,000 miles; and first 2• That this rate shall be in full force and effect for milea expenses incurred from and after June 14, 1989, ge p,-61489-16 ACTION N0. ITEM NUMBER ~" OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE MEETING OF THE BOAR COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER AT A REGULAR HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA MEETING DATE: June 14, 1989 a Fireworks Permit for Hills Department AGENDA ITEM: Approval of Store COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: 0/~ SUMMARY OF INFORMATION fireworks • requested a permit for a North Store has Fireworks Unlimited of the Hills Department July 4, 1989' will agree to display to be held on the display and they were discussed will conduct These precautio1989. Carolina recautions. h on June ~~ following safety P roved by Sherif f Kavanaug K a v a n a u g h~ s with and apP S h e r i f f M i c h a e l ten off- P u r s u a n t t o required to employ the Hills is one hour before recommendation, s t a r t i n g one hour beyond the duty officers, to extend fireworks begin and end. Six of these officers time that the fireworks handle additional traffic on be assigned tO and four would be used on would Route 221, Route 419 and artment Store. the parking lot at Hills deP for the h plans Marshal Kenneth Sharp has commends reviewed royal of app t e ermit. the p Fir e la and he fireworks disp Y re STAFF RECOMMENDATION the fireworks display with the recommends approval of Staff precautions outlined above. SUBMITTED BY: ~'Y~ ~ . Mary H• Allen Deputy Clerk ~,~pPROVED BY : Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ~'~~ ------------------------- VOTE -------- ----- Yes No pbs _----------- ACTION Bob L. Johnson/Lee tt X - - pipproved (X) Motion bY~ Denied ( ) Garrett Received ( ) Referred T o : _-- cc: File File Fireworks Permit Sheriff Kavanaugh Chief Fuqua Garre X- - Johnson x - _ - McGraw - _ Nickens x - - _ Robers x - - ~~ FIREWORKS DISPLAY PERMIT APPLICATION Pursuant to the provision of Section 11-2 of the Roanoke County Code the following organization hereby applies to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County for a display of fireworks within Roanoke County. ' cL~S ~~~ s.~~ 1. Name of Organization: ~ 1 2. Address: -f --~ ~ 1---- ~' ~~e rS~f77, 3. Date of Fireworks Display: Location of Fireworks Display: 3~-~k ~ ~T'~ ~~~~~~ ~ ~~~ 4. 5. Name and address of h Sali ualif capon as an ~lexpert: uct such display and basis for q `' ~' ~ ~/ur.~5 ~lr~v LirniT 6. Attach copy of Certificate of Insurance. 7. Attach a safety plan outlining precautions that will be implemented for the duration of the fireworks display: The undersigned hereby certifies that the provisions of Section 11-2 of the Roanoke County Code have been read and will be complied with by said organization. Any fireworks that remain unfired after the display shall be immediately disposed of in a safe manner. / S' ~1,~ -~i~'S ~~ fTl4L ~ L~i°'/ Name Title ~ ,~~~•~r--,~,,-,i5 ~~~~, c ~` ' ALLIELI SPECIALTY INSURANCE: INC. ~3.70~~ 1U~451 Gulf E+aul.evard Treasure 1:~I.and> I- Lerida Ta L L ~" 1~8C~U~28U~673b-•~~ Lor i fat i one l Cei"t if irate number: ~~ 1S CERT,IF~WUF~SO~~I~NSARANCE NAMEWRi-ADDUESSmO~edINS~RED: C~ t . 1, ~3 a X :?S7A Ya n;reYV i L le, NC ~73~~'9 ADDITIONAL INSUREDS Hills Stores Company, All Landlords, Property Owners and Municipalities efi~M~C~X-l:.L1S~E~~. ~1liE COMPANY: ~ I.Lkl.LEs..-IY.I~lAL"s1I1C~?..___- CSklt~E?s9AJG....__..____..._._..__.___. pOL.,ICY NUMHER:,T,~ _____~~,Qw~g~~_..__._____.. EXCESS_CI~uEBH~xE _._._.._____.._____-.-___.__. LIADILITY LIMY • $od I Ly In~ury and __.. ~ -..__~_______..___.__.#_.._. ~ma e: ___~1:4~Sc~.Q~S~____~___ _~..._______._.._____-- Excess of .Property 9 Excess of Class P Fr od ue te ___..~e___.__..__..--..-------.-._ -_ 0/00/00 FOL'ICY FERI_ODS J/O1/89 O/00/00 O/00/00 F1 TOS /t3~.•'a0 O/00/00 ~ -- CCMPINEr SINGLE LIMIT In the rruE'nt of anYd~~~~y tt0 g~jvegwritterirnoticeltutthi, partvtwhamlti"~~stcer ~ the co-npany wi L L en tificate is issued~thetcampanye to give such notice shall impose no liabili Y ai ab L t rs~it i an upon • Jul_ 4, 1989 @ 10.15pm DATE OF DISPLAY. -, Y__.__._..- • NAME b ADDRESS OF CERTIFICATE HOLDER: RAIN DATE: ,]ul ..5x_.1.989 @ 10.15pm Hills Department Stores DISPt-AY AMOUN : ~ • 15 Dan Road LOCATION OF DI5PLAYS RoanokeamVAet2401genue - 4~5 Canton, Massachusetts 02021 to the rampant a'~ It !s a ~:anditian at the paLlcY ?net aLL diSpLays !ie i"epai"#ed Least ~~+ hours i n advance of .the d i sp LaY date. NbTE: In the event This certificate ntliedhebY {he~polieyties>adescr~bedehereannds extends ar aL ers the CoV~'i"aGJe affo r-, rn, ~h tg this d 35u laY ~-auR?i'agp i,,i L l aF'F' i•Y that ra i r? n?- i t?c Lr?R?ent ~.,e,a#h.:•?" ~'. h ;- t on a subse~~.uerit dCleanuPwandhpa L~cdi n~lpafYthe d~sp layi ~hentheer~sponsi~b i Lei tY pO l icy t:antract. of the :,~ari4.~ors. 'she fa l tows o9 an~za~~i ont p?n-acamm,i #tee~~theYowner ar le~~eetofnanYsn~em~sesnused s~ansorin9 ~ _ p by the t~+same t on lvi ad • oespey t~uacc i dents-;oai~ i ~ i Qga a ut nofa tfiier n;~g L i cyence afnitht= ~7cape :C ns ur ed ~ b i~amtd Irisure~t:l ar~ the Named Insured's erne I.oYee's acting i n the course any _ of their ernptL,u1 e~ntheAd~sP I.aY ondbeha Lf Lafar#t?e NarsnedelnsuredTn~hP~n~nsui°Cinnt ti"octal kfha cioE~s net apt Ly to any fa i Lurt= to pa L i c:h~ ar it leanuA the d i Cp Lay, or L i ab i L i ty <al" i :~ i ng there f i° am. This certiotcValltiy)net valid unless an original signature appears below. (Copies N Coverage under theePNationel F/reiProtectionnAs~ociatmoni(NFPA)ycodesiand1eds w l th all app t i cab l standards i n effect at the time of d isp LaY• _.._._.._.._.....-......~1~~:._.S)N.~.__,~~?~~:s~i:aiii.~~ Authorize igna•tui"e 1- X:-a to of Cier t i f f ca to t.>~z v'`.~:f. t:,tt ! ~ ~::;A~.[..IE:i:t.. SF'ECIAL7'Y rNSU~iAi~lC .y. , .f, ~ t ~:Irr ~~ (••~ ~,i...t. . ti+t.:t ~ x~ C~•~'cT]:F•ICATE Ot~' xNSURAI~ICE !"..:. .'Cf~,e.tiifaf'tr'~';~ }'i.j';';it~'i..i~l}'. NAME ~ AUI~~iESS Or~ nr~xrxoNAi_ xNSUizEri: } -:? r;?: r~•;~ tir !• ! {•,, :. h•...! .. Hills Stores ~~•• ..:' :~ ."~ ; •:• Company, All Landloi Property Owners and Municipalitie Ffr,~MAfiX....~~1U~fiA~aE EX~~~~....~~?51.~~~A~x~ C4MFgNY: TT . y• i~xA~xi"xrY i~rMxr. ..._ ..................._......._...._.............. .............. .................. Y r n ,~ u r Y and r., hY ................. i~a d i ~ .............. .................... _..._................................... ._ .....................-.......................... Propel"'CY I1e3m8g~: / ....... _ .................................................................._.. ................. ' ............ .~ '~ ~f...ty j{ .. ~............... .. .:...~o. 1.: rf.. .. .. )f ~.+ ~!! .. ... .. .... .... .... iP. Ci~sS ,~+ ...........) . .. ...~... {, >~(7i~xCY t^E~I~Dcfis .........."i ;.x:..t_...... .......................... ............ .. _.. • •t.._. o m ~ .......,.. ........_. ;,. 1..... ... • _ .' ra ~a r .,~ .....__..._ .... ) .........._..... _ ................. ..: ,.. . ,. t f t t°~ ... } ~• ,.: ri'Y iii t ~ i. J .!. i 't' t i:: •I. iiii;? 1 . .:, f:r ri {:! {~?;:i v is i" •i" i~: r !it . ;Y,'.•1 c:, t ~.# .~... rl ?.. r.. .i 1, -... ,. t'T'~. 1 tt: i:I:t .:f ~1, ., ... • • • ~ ri t ~' t: t: ~' i i (' s. ~ ~_:. j •r { ;) ri r: ;-: •. ?~ .r •!` ~i i i. ? i, #• ?.:y { t ... ) .L i ,::: r"» _ • .4. f'f T' •' .. Ci i i ,r tt • 4. ... ... ,.. f; j'i ; t7(ii' !:. i}tt1 [:i .:j ~ ! t:i trr:: l ti .. .. .. i:'~:'_• -.. :: {w!.:fj rir ` t.. t.!..:i t.. .~.~. .'dlt tj ~ lf'r /( r.. :~) NAME ~ '- .) ~(' i i:: r.~., ;:; r' ;: iti t ~:> ; ; ::.:•• ' ~ ADIXREaa OF .. ?) !. f. t .ti-:? r:) <:i;~' t... CER7'xFICArE MtJi..LtEt~i: ?{) !• i ~:?I:) i f. i t Hills Department Stores 15 Dan Road Z-A?E Off' ~xSFUAY: Jul RAxN DATE• .y 4•~ 1989 @ 10: ~~_~~~ S ........................_ anton, Massachusetts 02021 LOCArxpN q~~~i`AY AM©UI~lT:•-~ ;;,','•..1.•989 @ i0:i5pm .,..r .... ... : { t t ;; r: 3901 Brambleton Av ., • c:i t::.'i~ : ~ ~ :.:_?.• _. ; ?t {' ~ f rt•;,:: i:} r `: t ;-•t. .t.i.:., •r r. r r•~ t : r Roa , VA enue i<:> c:: c., ftr')it t t t.rt ?tic {)•,• .:• ......:: ,•, noke 24018 .~l.T{°, ` t?t' ;' .:t<:t,.} t?'j rt' {1??rtif~?,~lf ?!'j~,. .~i',i. r rl,tfi;::'i t!i''C'i+} l.;y ,{:~;:}'f'r:tia _ ` ... ..:r:.:} ::'t:}r: ?...pr:,ty •t'ft 'f'r':i:.> !.; {jil}t:.'-i: i .d , G ri °... `'l.t, r {si . r:r• t,1t rrl i:d yl-i, :I ! ~?{i: ~ .. .. .... ~ ....r. _. ..... ... .. .}r ! i. ... r!. rj.-#•r r:.: ca?°?r ti i•I•)it :t ?~t-]•i:),!?r(~~lf~.~ :'=it's:=Y ..: ;• .. 3.. 1. ._. f r?J Y? t' ..? F • ~ ~ _ n f i i :: f'i t : •- .' - 1•? ' {•f i e;, Yl F#r t t•f:i. ` <~1 :, 'f.' i::; tj 'f• { !'i {;; ., ...• ... ••- ('; r•; s Y? ! ~. F} , # • t~' i:! 1 i:: ~:; i a 1• ,:? w~ a T Yi + : J4:•, 'F° ~.. ., + ~' !• t~ f :::. ij t....w .. .: r? C:' i:> !) '. i t:: i ?'?;:r r !" •,! t !"' !• !:{ .. tar j r ~' •:~ t:r rs {.,,t i !. !. .:? r.} ,:} Y? '1' , t: !`• t3 ,. . is xt .. .. (' .. ! v • •:•F.,.., rl t ~ 'f'ir + ri ! ~•r, .. :~ v !t't ~; r; ? i ~• ~- .. ttt:i tt. i' F::'i:f < r- a i) ~' : , Ili ll .! .'tt~ r,M1 A -~. !.? r7r ` '• t i +.. n.• t::. j i. .t. .. ,.l lA !~ .. , . r.? Y?,:~'' ?:} t ri ral Yt r•;:?. { _-.. -: i i {) Yi .,. f~!:,f1:=T ::r "' •-- ~ r ., ;_~: ~::,• ., . i::•'• ,:i?a •tri t~;. {);- `+}fS16}i,iF:1H:5 <:#-:. .:=c):.`, ;:?' ?: 'F 'Y t' i F:? i f .1 . !r• t.f n ... r ,.. ~ ::: ,}i {:: i:.' i is t~ ~ 3"e 1' :ci ~ - t ~'Y i7q•'iJi')'t' f Pita ca t:7 r; k! ~' y •ft>+.k'it? t r•: '{f r.;r::i{. •t.,... ... .;. (~•it'.(.5 !. {)'y'ititi`f1'i '~1 ... .. .. ) (( .. . s '.? r - .~? 6'~i Fa i•! i. t i r:}4.f s 1 t ` i E? iA •i' + ... 1t? i 1 ~1. 1• f~? (::i f'yt :)t.. :;: •i r': •r•• • ...._ ...: t; ;. , i't` ~ ;:itiii::yi:f ,.. 5 .7 rf r~ -: k:'(t?t:. r. li VF:?t::1'ta ,•r U t t l~t li'+ r•ri::r ,.. ' : '::! {.~ kr ii: r-, rj ., . ! ... e # ( !:- fi> 'f• ; ~:~ f ; i ::i• ;ii C.r r i 's ~,:) rT;:; !. :.. `~ {:: ~. i Yica ! i'1 .f:...., ; i !. i i, l ~~:~ r i i:::}:. .;. f.i fr? ,.,. ;,#1:} s l..,. {: i ~:>}:i} !. -: {) i'";:trlit:?{:! 1~ ;: ,: -•• ' frt. i:: {) tdi" <:,r,~ t i)'!'` :"t i' t •~: .{ .• lil:l f.. i''+ !~•r1 ;••.;# Y?:-' '!'{t 1 1. fj Y,r::, .. CI?;: fj?ci %.T rj '(~ .i. 1.?!ta ! ~crill`;.~r~• t'•rti ... ...! {.: ~: ~'F .' 'f 'it l:: {'.+(:} Th i .tl o ~ C. .. t :'r,.•:, {)?" C: i. i•::•%i Y?!t;::f... ,~(i•i i,; ,?+.r?: ? ~I ~.:r~ ~ '~"t, °+ , "i' t •YTtf• {:; {) r;.... s cer t ~ f i ca fie i s :.! i =rsr.> '. <x ~ ,, ~) #•~ !. i ::?I: r •I? i)~!• f CCapies Nofi Vaitd.)not valid unless an Covera ~ o~`i9inal sic~nafiure appears wifih ~ under the polio belaw. sfiandat~gsap~llcabie National ~o~dtfiioned effect a Frafiecfilaroin full compliance by ail insureds at fihe time of d15piay. Assaciafitari CNFFA) codes and .., ...................f..t....: ~~~•, tt . . ,{.,:i ~!•r, rl T: (-. ~'•' ....sr. ai:.r.. .....1•. 'r t.y r:^ ~ t t::::# T(:t ~f. iii 'ii !.?;:? ?'?C: t:: - .. .:.. / 7~ - ACTION N0. ITEM NUMBER)-'" OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE THE BOARD ADMINISTRATION CENTER REGULAR MEETINAT THE ROANOKE COUNTY COUNTY,, VIRGINIA HELD MEETING DATE: June 14, 1989 roval of a Raffle Permit from the ITEM: Request for aPP AGENDA Vinton Moose Lodge COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR S COMMENTS: TION• hold a INFORMA Permit to SUMMARY OF requested a Raffle has been reviewed Lodge has application that it be The Vinton Moose 1889. This he recommends on November 12' Revenue and raffle of by the Commissioner approved. 25.00 The organization has paid the $ STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended approved. fee. lication for a Raffle Permit be that the aPP APPROVED BY: SUBMITTED BY : ~~ ,~J Elmer C. Hodge istrator Allen County Admin -_ Dept Y•Clerk _________________________TE ------ ut _ VO ---------------------- Yes No Abs -------- ACTION Garrett ~ -~- ~_ Approved (x) Motion bY~ Johnson X- ~ _ ( ) X Denied McGraw x Received ( ) Nickens - Referred Robers To:~~ cc: File permit File Bingo/Raffle COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA COMMISSIONER OF THE REVENUE R BINGO N FOR PERMIT TO CONDUCT RAFFLES O APPLICATIO raffle permit. bingo game or laws, made for a County and State hereby subject to all force, or that may be Applicatiq-a is is made now in b the under- This application and regulations reed to Y under rules, which are hereby deemed a condition ordinan hereafter and shall be enacted 1 icant and which signed app ermit is issued. which this P ,,,Q the accura- care to ens.-Bingo games should exercisf flowing questions. t. se • All applicants to the Title 18.2-340 1 Sect~n cY of ,.heir reap°strictly regulated by and by and raffles are Virginia Code, laws authorize statutes of the Code. These investiga' of the criminal Roanoke County reasonabThe Board has . se of the conduct a ermit. 4-85 = Board of Supervisors to raffle P deny the the County bingo orlication to grant or to granting a ermit of any tion prior the filing of an app or revoke the p and days from deny, suspend, fiance with county sixty The Board may in strict comp permit. found not to be organization these state law. ulations concerning county or state reg Any person who .violating of a Class 1 misdemeanor. raffles for any Any person uilty is from bingo or community, permits shall be g toss receip charitable , s ecif i' any Part of the glawful religious, uses than the the organizaeXpenses, shall purpose other oses for which erating or educational PeXCept for reasonable oP cally or9anizedClass 6 felony. be guilty of a THIS APPLICATION IS FOR: (check one) BINGO GAMES RAFFLE PERMIT r anizatlon, Name of 0 g 1,~,~'4~ i'V .n/ Street Address_ ~ ~.~6+~--'~'-'°'!_~ Mailing Address__.~_!-1!~'~-`. X17 . ~ n~ City, State, Zip Code ' ~~ v purpose and Type of Organization ~a~~ When was the organization founded? 1 ~-~ ~ R ~p o k~ ~~~~~~ meeting place? two con- in Roanoke County for Roanoke County existence Has organization been NO_.~- tinuous years? YES.-- ~ N0~- rof it? YES__~ anization non-P ~'tf' - 069 ~- Is the °rg Number # Indicate Federal Identification h copy of IRS Tax Exemption letter. Attac anization: ~ ~~ ~~'~~ of the Org president ~~ GY Officers ~/ Vice- ~~~~ President 6 Address: ~ ~r Address ~. ~i "I y Treasurer: ~d ~ ~ ~e J ~ .Address : ~o ~ Address: ~ ~ ~P opera- responsible for Raffle. Member authorized to be ~pJ/ 4 f~ 4/ /'~ C Name J f _ ~ ~~ f~,? ~ b . / v Home Address phone °-r Phone iG~ ~ "~%~L'~ ~~~~~Bus . THE NAMES AND ADDRESSES COMPLETE LIST OF THIS APPLICATION. SHED WITH 1 cation wY}ere Ra ~ ~e ~v'~.Shi^'~ fi~,/ /~~ . A FURNI SHIP MUST BE or Bingo Game ~s Spec f is ~J OF CURRENT MEMO ~'" p;.-,r,~ ,~~ /.~/ 4 ~ ~,/~ ~' t4. be conducted. 1h ~ cS ~- L ° ~ ~' t. 02 r v ~~ ,~, ,~ ~% ~ ~~T ime Drawing y° RAFFLES: Date of f Activity: o f Dr aw i ng_--- ~ --- BINGO: Days of Week & Hours `To Y ---'-Tuesday ---'""-Wednesday -'-"-'-Thursday ~-Friday --~Saturd~ .~-~ From ~ From To`- F ~- rom~- To_____- romp- To~_ To~_ Fr From - To~- 2 L-'~ o Raffle will be from the Bing ~ the proceeds. the proceeds use of lanned or intended State specifically hOthe p List in detail ~~ '~~,~~~,1 used. amounts if necessary • C-'y~P/`~ ~~,~ L~f~`'`~ Use estimates ~ ~pN 1 ~ v~ h ~ ,~~ h ,era ,-~s ~t~~G'`e- S~~a~S,~ ~~ ~vv ~~ L ~d y T ~o ~v~ v ~ i /~W~'v~S 3 L°'7 BINGO: Complete the following: be conducted: s) of the building where BINGO is to Legal ner( - Name: Address: ate~_Z ip--~ County 501-C non-Profit organization?__~--~- ing owned b Is the bui tion: capacity for each to Seati spaces for each location parking UESTIONS 1 - 19 AppLICANTS MUST ANSWER Q BINGO to the operation of ALL RAFF''I'E AND related r for ca1en- all sources uarter for p 1, Gross receipts from calendar q o amen or Instant Bingo by Bing g INSTANT BINGO dar year period . r--. NGO 1st Quarter 1st Quarte ,s7rid Quarter 2nd Quarter >~'`~ 3rd Quarter r`' 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter 4th Quarter Total Total d that it is a violation of underst n firm, associa- organization with any person or classifica- 2. oes your a contract oration of any or con- law to enter into or corp managing. organization, partnership, tion, for the pureose of organ= ' tion whatsoeoeGames or Raffles?~.~~ ducting Bing it must maintain a~Q understa a~sbursements pertaining to 3• are Does your organizatreCeipts and subject lete records of and that such reco~ ~~ file comp and Raffles, Bingo b ames issioner of the Revenue3~- audit y the Comm that the Commis emises understand on the p raffle, our organizationhas the right to 9o upo ame or 4. Does Y his designee a Bing g re- the Revenue or organization is conductisecure for audit all audits, and to or raffles? on which anY Bingo games to perform unannounced wired to be maintained for cords req 4 r 5. Does your organization understand that a Financial Report must be filed with the Commissioner of the Revenue on or before the first day of November of each calendar year for which a per- mit has been issued?~ ~ S 6. Does your organization understand that if gross receipts ex- ceed fifty thousand dollars during any calendar quarter, an addi- tional Financial Report must be filed for such quarter no later than sixty days following the last day of such quarter?_ ( ~ 7. Does your organization understand that the failure to file financial reports when due shall cause automatic revocation of the permit, and no such organization shall conduct any Bingo game or raffle thereafter until such report is properly filed and a new permit is obtained? ~ ~S -~_ 8. Does your organization understand that each Financial Report must be accompanied by a Certificate, verified under oath by the Board of Directors, that the proceeds of any Bingo game or raffle have been used for these lawful, religious, charitable, commu- nity, or educational purposes for which the organization is spe- cifically chartered or organized, and that the operation of Bingo games or raffles have been in accordance with the provisions of Article 1.1 of Chapter 8, Title 18.2 of the Code of Virginia?~ ~S 9. Does your organization understand that a one percent audit fee of the gross receipts must be paid to the County of Roanoke upon submission of the annual financial report due on or before the first of November? t.~~~ 10. Does your organization understand that this permit is valid only in the County of Roanoke and only at such locations, and for such dates, as are designated in the permit application? 11. Does your organization understand that no person, except a bona fide member of any such organization who shall have been a member of such organization for at least ninety days prior to such participation, shall. participate in tha management:, opera- tion, or conduct of any bingo game or raffle, and no person shall receive any remuneration for participating in management, operation, or conduct~of any such game or raffle? 1.~~ 12. Has your organization attached a check for the annual permit fee in the amount of $25.00 payable to the County of Roanoke, Virginia? -d-~S 13. Does your organization understand that any organization found in violation of the County Bingo and Raffle Ordinance or §18.2- 340.10 of the Code of Virginia authorizing this permit is subject to having such permit revoked and any person, shareholder, agent, member or employee of such organization who violates the above to having such permit revoked and any person, shareholder, agent, member or employee of such organization who violates the above referenced Codes may be guilty of a felony? 4 CS 5 E.'r/ 14. Has your organization attached a complete list of its member- ship to this application form? G/~~ 15. Has your organization attached a copy of its bylaws to this application form?~~ 16. Has the organization been declared exempt from property taxa- tion under the Virginia Constitution or statutes? If yes, state whether exemption is for real, perso 1 pro ert , or both and identify exempt property. /Q~a,~, ~yi~r~~w,o 17. State the specific t anization. 18. Is this organization incorporated in Virginia? N GS If yes, name and address of Registered Agent: L~~u/ oy~ty o~ .~aaS~ 19. Is the organization registered with the Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Affairs pursuant to the Charitable Solicitations Act, Section 57-48 of the Virginia Code? ~/ a (If so, attach copy of registration.) Has the organization been granted an exemption from registration by the Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Affairs? _~~ (If so, attach copy of exemption.) ALL RAFFLE APPLICANTS DESCRIBE THE ARTICLES TO BE RAFFLED, VALUE OF SUCH ARTICLES, AND PROCEED TO NOTARIZATION. Article Description Fair Market Value ~r~ o e~ ~~ `1 6 ~" ~i~ ALL BINGO APPLICANTS MUST ANSWER QUESTIONS 20 - 27 BEFORE NOTARIZATION RAFFLE APPLICANTS, GO TO NOTARIZATION. 20.. Does your organization understand that the bingo games shall not be conducted more frequently than two calenda days in any Cale ar week? 21. Doe your organization understand that it i required to keep complete cords of the bingo game. These recor s based on 518.2- 340.6 of t e Code of Virginia and 54.98 of Roanoke County Code must include the following: a. A record the date, quantity, an card value of instant bingo suppli s purchased, as well as he name and address of the supplie of such instant bi go supplies, and written invoice or receipt is also require for each purchase of in- stant bingo supp ies? b. A record in writi g of the d~'tes on which Bingo is played, the number of peop e in attendance on each date, and the amount of receipts and prizes on each day? (These records must be retained for three years.) c. A record of the name an~ door prize, regular ores from the playing of Bi~go address of each individual to whom a ecial Bingo game prize or jackpot ~s awarded? d. A complete and ite ized reb~ord of all receipts and disburse- ments which suppor , and that agree with, the quarterly and annual reports r quired to b filed, and that these records must be maintain d in reasonabl order to permit audit? 22. Does your or anization understan that instant Bingo may only be conducted at uch time as regular 'ngo game is in progress, and only at s h locations and at suc times as are specified in this applicat' n? 23. Does y ur organization understand th t the gross receipts in the cours of a reporting year from the pla ing of instant Bingo may not xceed 33 1/3$ of the gross receipt of an organization's Bingo o eration? 24. Iy6es your organization understand it may\ of sell an instant Bin card to an individual below sixteen years of age? ~. Does your organization understand that an rganization whose ross receipts from all bingo operations that a Geed or are ex- pected to exceed $75,000 in any calendar year hall have been granted tax-exempt status pursuant to Section 501 of the United States Internal Revenue Service? •, (Certificate must be attached.) 7 26. es your organization understand that a tificate of Occu- pancy st be obtained or be on file which horizes this use at the prop ed location? 27. Does yo r organization underst d that awards or prize money or merchandi valued in excess of the following amounts are illegal? a. No door prize s~iall ex~eed twenty-five dollars. b. No regular Bingo r special Bingo game shall exceed One Hund- red dollars. c. No jackpot of any nat a whatsoever shall exceed One Thousand Dollars, or shall the t al amount of jackpot prizes awarded in any ne calendar day ex ed One Thousand Dollars. NOTARIZATION: THE FOLLOWING OATH MUST BE TAKEN BY ALL APPLICANTS I hereby swear or affirm under the penalties of perjury as set forth in §18.2 of the Code of Virginia, that all of the above statements are true to the best of my knowledge, information, and beliefs. All questions have been answered. Signed by: w Title Home Address Name Subscribed and sworn before me, this day of 19 My commission expires: 19 Notary Public RETURN THIS COMPLETED APPLICATION T0: COMMISSIONER OF THE REVENUE P.O. Box 20409 Roanoke, VA 24018-0513 8 ~,, °~ ~~ NOT VALID UNLESS COUNTERSIGNED The above application, having been found in due form, is approved and issued to the applicant to have effect until December 31st of this calendar year. Date ommiss'oner of Reven The above application is not approved. Date Commissioner of the Revenue 9 ACTION NO. A-61489-15•e ITEM NO . ~"" AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BO OANOKESCOUNTYSADMINISTRATION COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE R MEETING DATE. June 14, 1989 AGENDA ITEM' Indemnity Agreement Henry Acres Subdivision COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: G~ BACKGROUND' • and Virginia B. Henry desire to subdivThe Walter Lewis Henry road to be con- 5.85 acres on State Route 9the dedication cofs a ubdivision condary subdivision plat includes art of the se otential legal problem structed to statestaffd hass dentified a pap in Tess and egress road system. rivate easement of g concerning an unreleased p an adjoining parcel. serving resent to the County that this private easement The Henrys rep since the purpose for said is extinguished as a matter of law, dedication and acceptance easement ceases upon the establishment, ublic. Since a question exists as to the of the road to the P The Henr s are submitting an indemnity Y legal effect of such action, a incurred a reement to the County in the amount of $10,000 to indemnify an g for any expense, loss or damag claim concerning this issue, as a hold harmless the County by it in connect rovallof the subdivision. result of the app SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: royal of this The Indemnity Agreement is attached hereto. App ends. A reement is appropriate on the Consent Ag on the indemnity ag osited with the Treasurer up executionaof thisoagreement,dep ALTERNATIVES AND IMPACTS: f the Board authorizes the exeoceednand the Countyeshall I agreement, then the subdivision will pr to $10,000. Staff calculates this sum to be be indemnified up future legal proceedings. sufficient to resolve any f the Board refuses to authorie able to csubdivide this I not b agreement, then the Henrys may ~" V ro erty as planned, and they must explore other alternatives. P P STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the ~ ° A d eementron behalf ofuthe Administrator to execut~o ed bydthelCounty Attorney. County, upon a form aPP Respectfully submitted, ~.~r-~~ Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney Vote Action No Yes Abs TT ~, r ~ ickens / Garrett x Approved (x) Motion by Johnson x Denied ( ) McGraw x Received ( ) Nickens x Referred Robers x to ____-_--- cc: File Attorney Paul Mahoney, County Phillip Henry, Director, Engineering Arnold Covey, Director, Development & Inspections t ~„" INDEMNITY AGREEMENT This Indemnity Agreement is made this 23rd day of May, husband 1989 between Walter Lewis Henry and Virginia B. Henry, and wife, hereafter "the Henrys", as Indemnitors and the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia, hereafter "the Board", as Indemnitee. FACTUAL BACKGROUND 1, The Henrys are the owners of a parcel of land on Virginia Secondary Route No. 923 (Corntassel Lane) in Roanoke County, Virginia, containing 5.85 acres, more or less, to be subdivided into Henry Acres Subdivision as shown by a plat of survey prepared by Fred 0. Shanks, III, P.C., dated December 28, 1988. 2. The subdivision plat includes a road identified as Henry Farms Road to be constructed by ,the Henrys to Virginia secondary road standards, dedicated to public use and made a part of the secondary road system of the Commonwealth of Virginia. 3, Encompassed within Henry Farms Road as shown on the ress and egress subdivision plat is a private easement of ing to and from Virginia Secondary Route No. 923 appurtenant to a parcel of land containing 1.091 acres situate on the northerly side of Henry Farms Road and the westerly side of Route No. 923 and identified in the records of Roanoke County, Virginia, r ~~ as Tax Parcel No. 85.04.-2-17. As of the date of this Indemnity Agreement this parcel is owned by Clark Owen, Jr. and Emilie M. Owen. 4. The private road easement appurtenant to the Owens' property has not been released of record. 5. Upon approval of a subdivision plat providing for the dedication of a road to the public, the Board must provide to the Virginia Department of Transportation the unencumbered and unobstructed use of all public road rights-of-way shown on the plat. 6. The Henrys represent to the Board that the private easement of ingress and egress is extinguished as a matter of law, since the purpose for said easement ceases upon the establishment, dedication and acceptance of a road to the public. In reliance upon this representation the Board desires to approve the subdivision plat of Henry Acres without the private easement of ingress and egress in a portion of Henry Farms Road appurtenant to tax parcel no. 85.04-2-17 having been released, provided the Henrys indemnify and hold harmless the Board for any loss or expense incurred by it in connection with any claim made or legal proceeding brought by the owners of Tax Parcel No. 85.04-2-17 that would interfere with or obstruct the use by the public of Henry Farms Road. TERMS OF AGREEMENT NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION of the premises and i L- S~ intending to be legally bound, the parties agree as follows: 7. The Board will cause the subdivision plat of Henry Acres Subdivision to be approved, subject to the outstanding private easement of ingress and egress in a portion of Henry Farms Road as shown on said plat which is appurtenant to Tax Parcel No. 85.04-2-17, being extinguished as a matter of law, the purpose for the easement having ceased. g. The Henrys, jointly and severally, will indemnify and hold harmless the Board for any expenses, loss or damages incurred by it in connection with any claim brought by the owners of Tax Parcel No. 85.04-2-17, including any injunctive proceeding, which is adverse to the interests of Roanoke County or the Virginia Department of Transportation in Henry Farms Road or which interferes with or obstructs the public use of Henry Farms Road. g. The Henry's liability under this agreement shall not exceed $10,000.00, an amount agreed by the parties to be the reasonable cost of defending any action brought or claim made against the county arising out of the subject matter of this agreement and/or acquiring any outstanding private easement of access either by negotiated purchase or by the right of eminent domain. 10. This indemnity agreement is secured by a certified check, cash escrow, bond or letter of credit in the amount of $10,000.00 to be delivered to the Board contemporaneously with ~" (j the execution of this agreement and approval of the Henry Acres Subdivision plat. 11. In the event a claim is made or legal proceeding out of the private road brought against the Board arising easement hereinabove described, the Board shall immediately notify the Henrys and provide them with a reasonable opportunity to defend the claim or proceeding or take such ro riate. In an emergency, the other action as may be app P be reasonably Board shall cause such action to be taken as may necessary to provide for the uninterrupted use of the road by the public. The Board will cooperate with the Henrys in all necessary under the respects as may be reasonably circumstances, including the purchase of any outstanding rivate easement either by negotiation or through the right of P eminent domain. Any attorneys to be retained by the Board for these purposes shall be ,subject to the prior approval of the Henrys which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. ears 12. This Indemnity Agreement shall terminate five y after the acceptance of the aforesaid Henry Farms Road into the secondary road system of the Commonwealth of Virginia or the termination of the private easement hereinabove described, whichever shall first occur. 13. If the Department of Transportation refuses to accept the dedication of the proposed public road into the State Secondary Highway System as a result of this private "~" easement of ingress and egress, then the Henrys shall secure a release of these private easement rights. The Board will cooperate with the Henrys and assist them in securing such a release in any reasonable manner, including exercise of the right of eminent domain if necessary. Until the Henrys secure such a release, the Henrys agree not to request any partial or final release of any bond, escrow, letter of credit, or other performance guarantee for the ocnstruction of any facilities required for this subdivision. Until acceptance of this road by the Department, the Henrys shall be responsible for all maintenance and repairs, including snow removal. WITNESS the following signatures and seals: (Seal) Walter Lewis Henry . ( Seal ) Virginia B. Henry BOARD OF SUPERVISORS FOR THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE By (Seal) N-/ COUL~Fi'Y OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA CAPITAL FUND - UNAPPROPRIATED BALANCE Beginning Balance at July 1, 1988 $12,644 Additional Amount from 1988-89 Budget 50,000 November 22, 1988 Improvements at pd[ninistrative Center (6,450) Balance as of June 14, 1989 56 194 Submitted by _~~~=~~ ~;,~_~ ~, Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance N °-~ COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA UNAPPROPRIATED BALANCE - GAL FUND Balance at July 1, 1988 $3,037,141 August 9, 1988 Dixie Caverns Landfill Cleanup (400,000) September 13, 1988 Transfer to Board Contingency (50,000) September 26, 1988 Design Phase of Spring Hollow (175,000) Reservoir October 25, 1988 Funding for Public Information (46,500) Officer Novemi~er 9, 1988 Dixie Caverns Landf ill Cleanup (260,000) November 22, 1988 Lease Additional Office Space (34,783) (23,855) February 28, 1989 Election Expenses Primary April 25, 1989 County Administrator's Vehicle (14,685) All America City Expenditures (20,000) April 25, 1989 $2.0_ Balance as of June 14, 1989 Su}~nitted by Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance ~ "° ~~y OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA RESERVE FOR BOARD COI~I'INGENCY Original Budget at July 1, 1988 $50,000 June 28, 1988 Funding of Length of Service Benefit for Volunteer Fire, Rescue, and (9 000) Auxiliary Sheriff's Deputies , July 26, 1988 Tweed's Access Road (39,405) September 13, 1988 Add to Board Contingency from 000 50 Unappropriated Balance , September 26, 1988 Beautification of Brambleton Avenue (3,500) September 28, 1988 Economic Development Trip to Northern 000) (1 Virginia (Approved Administratively) , October 6, 1988 Typewriter for Clerk of Courts (966) (Approved Administratively) October 6, 1988 Economic Development Promotion (1 025) (Approved Ar.~ministratively) , October 11, 1988 Safekeeping of Securities (2,000) October 20, 1988 Informational Brochure for November Election (Approved Administratively) (6,500) October 25, 1988 Additional Allocation to Total Action (10 000) Against Poverty (TAP) , November 3, 1988 Survey Fees - Safety Center and Forensics Lab Site (Approved Admin.) November 9, 1988 Bushdale Road (1,000) December 13, 1988 C. L. & O. Investors (365) December 20, 1988 Stonebridge Park Parking Lot (5 000) (Approved Administratively) , January 10, 1989 Salaries for Board of Zoning Appeals (625) January 24, 1989 Contribution to Arts Festival (1,000) January 24, 1989 Sesquicentennial History Books (300) May 9, 1989 Contribution to Better Beginnings Coalition (500) Balance as of June 14, 1989 15 341 Sulxnitted by Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance ACTION # ITEM NUMBER ~""~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE ROANORE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: June 14, 1989 AGENDA ITEM: Status of Street Light Replacement Program COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND: In June 1988, Roanoke County approved the replacement program for street lights whereby Roanoke County agreed to pay $38,694 to Appalachian Power Company to replace and upgrade the existing street lights from mercury vapor to high pressure sodium. This amount represented the remaining life value of the existing lights and will be available through savings in the reduction in the monthly billing. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Appalachian Power Company ordered the replacement lights the first of the year with the hopes that the lights would be available in March. There was a delay in getting the lights, however, the new lights are now available. In the most recent discussions with APCO, they indicated they would be proceeding with the replacement of the street lights in June. However, this program is primarily based on APCO's scheduling. The first phase will consist of replacing the 21,000 mercury vapor with 22, 000 high pressure sodium and some 7, 000 mercury vapor with 9,500 high pressure sodium. Most of these lights are located along the primary and most heavily traveled roads. The 3,500 mercury vapor lights will be replaced with 9,500 high pressure sodium and will be the last phase of the replacement. Since most lights in the residential areas are of this type, it may be six months to a year before these lights are replaced. The Engineering Department has also received approval from the Virginia Department of Transportation for APCO to work in the primary roadway right-of-ways without requiring revised permits. SUBMITTED BY: Phillip T. Henry, P.E. -~ Director of Engineering Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to: Motion by: APPROVED: ~~ ~~,~~ ~a-~i4 Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ACTION Garrett Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers VOTE No Yes Abs ACTION # ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEELDNATOTHEHROANOKE COUNTYEADMINISTRATIONNOCENTER COUNTY, VIRGINIA H MEETING DATE: June 14, 1989 AGENDA ITEM: WORK SESSION 75/25 Economic Development Policy COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND The staff made a presentation at the March 28, 1989 Bo o licy Supervisors meeting regarding the status of the 75/25 p adopted by the Board of Supervisors in early 191an be de eloped Supervisors requested that a specific action p within sixty (60) days reside at al/25$ecomme~cial/industrial efforts to achieve a 75~ tax base ratio beforerecommendatOons about siteedevelopments specific short range marketing efforts and industrial land use to implement the 75 25 policy. FISCAL IMPACT The Board has identified $100,000 in the FY 89-90 budget for an economic development project. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Blanes fforpecvonomic odevelopment /to policy as its policy guide Staff will reaffirm their commitment to this long range policy. implement the specific recommendations outlined within the policy. SUBMITTED BY: (/1N~-0 Timothy W. Gubala, Director Economic Development APPROVED BY: Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ___ ----- ----------------- VOTE ---------- ACTION No yeS Abs Approved ( ) Motion by: Garrett Denied ( ) Johnson Received ( ) McGraw Referred Nickens To ________ Robe r s Attachment o-~ ROANOKE COUNTY 75/25 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT POLICY UPDATE INVENTORY OF ASSETS RECOMMENDATIONS ON-GOING ACTIVITIES June 14, 1989 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY staff made a presentation at the March 28, 1989 BOao aicy The regarding the status of the 75/25 p Supervisors meeting ervisors in early 1987. The Board of adopted by the Board of Sup lan be developed s to address the economic development Supervisors requ6s0 )e d Y at a specific action prcial/industrial within sixty ( ort makes efforts to achieve a 75$ reseaeri2003/25The attached rep me nt, tax base ratio before the Y lement the 75/25 s ecif is short range recommenlal land useuto imp develop p efforts and Indust marketing policy. ~~ A, Update of current economic development activity Economic Development activity has picked up in Roanoke County this spring. Site plans, building permits and new business announcements are enumerated by square footage on Table 1. Some of the more significant activities are: Dominion Bankshares Corporation has filed a preliminary plan fo.r a 141,500 square foot, four story addition at their operations center on Plantation Road. They plan to make a capital expenditure between $5 and $10 million over the next year. This will serve present and future needs for the Operations Center. ITT (Electro-Optical Division) has received a building permit and started construction of a 5,000 square foot maufacturing building at their complex in Jamison Industrial Park. Kroger has obtained a building permit and started construction on a 42,500 square foot addition to the frozen storage facility at their complex in the Glenvar area. Three companies have purchased land in Roanoke County's Southwest Industrial Park. -Insulation Systems will construct a 20,000 square foot building and employ ten (10) to store and distribute commercial insulation material. 1 -A -Nelson Brumfield will construct a 10,000 square foot building and employ six (6) to manufacture kitchen counters and cabinets. A land sale is near completion for the purchase of 1.46 acres for the construction of a 10,000 square foot industrial incubator in Southwest Industrial Park. The vacant Moore's building on Brambleton Avenue has been sold to Roanoke Memorial for a clinic. Rennovations are anticipated during the summer of 1989. The 419 corridor has the following projects under construction: -A 60,000 square foot office building in Colonnade Corporate Center -A 26,294 square foot office building by Hong Ri Min -Virginia First Savings and Loan Branch at 419 and Chaparral. -Sleep Inn, a 104 room motel near Tanglewood Mall -Fralin and Waldron's Building "F" (47,700 square feet), five stories 2 0-I Two companies have located in the Vinton Industrial Park -American Profiles located a 26,600 square foot facility to manufacture veneer for (wood) moldings; employs 50. -Boxley Construction has relocated 70 employees into its 6,000 square foot complex from the City of Roanoke. TABLE 1 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES - MAY 1989 Site plans Building permits filed issued and under construction Office buildings in square 9 @ 256,643 3 @ 127,284 feet Industrial buildings in square 2 @ 20,800 5 @ 70,435 feet Other commercial 4 @ 51,581 6 @ 57,679 uses Total 15 @ 329,024 14 @ 255,408 Since January 1, 1989, the County staff has obtained eighteen (18) prospects from the following sources: Regional Partnership 2 Local realtors 7 Local business expansion contacts 7 Northern Virginia Marketing 1 Direct call 1 18 3 a_i All prospects are looking for "ready to go" industrial sites. Specific needs of each prospect are on file (confidential) with the Department of Economic Development. B. Inventory of assets In order for Roanoke County to have continued economic growth, the following County level assets are required: o Available, "ready to go" industrial sites using proper zoning, water, sewer and road access. o Marketing Strategy with up to date marketing material i.e., brochure, profile, marketing book. o A positive attitude and problem-solving methods to handling the concerns of local business and industry as they expand operations within the community. o Full-time, professional economic development staff at the local and regional level. These four assets are further described in their current condition below: 1. Need for "ready to go" industrial sites During the preparation of Roanoke County's Comprehensive 4 Plan, a 1984 land use survey determined that there were 997 acres of land used as industrial. During the five year interval, another 122 acres was rezoned to industrial M1 or M2 (according to Planning Commission Annual Reports) giving Roanoke County a theoretical inventory of 1119 acres of industrial used land. This inventory is not realistic because of the following reasons: a. Land use - the land included as being zoned, encompasses all industrial land used for its intended purposes. Therefore, large acreage tracts owned by such companies as Ingersoll-Rand (98 ac) and Koppers (89 ac) are industrially zoned and under single ownership even though a large portion of the property may be vacant. According to Roanoke County's real estate tax records, there are actually 457 parcels of 2201.34 acres zoned industrial in the county and 146.07 acres in Vinton. This is more than double the estimated figure of land used for industrial and implies that over 1100 acres of industrial land is vacant. b. Flood lp ain - A majority of the industrially zoned land in western Roanoke County is adjacent to the Roanoke River. Floods in both 1968 and 1972 were recorded and have been indicated on U.S. Army Corps of Engineers floodplain maps. This flooding threat has eliminated several large west county parcels from consideration as unrestricted industrial sites. 5 D-i c. Access - Access to a primary highway is an important consideration for property to be used for industrial purposes due to terrain, highway locations in the County and past land use patterns, land zoned industrial has serious access limitations in Roanoke County. For instance; 1) A potential 287 acre site in Eastern Roanoke County has only one access point along a narrow secondary road that crosses Norfolk/Southern railroad tracks at an unguarded crossing. 2) A 163 acre site in northern Roanoke County with interstate frontage has no direct access to a secondary road. 3) A l5 rail site in western Roanoke County has a narrow easement as an access means across other property. d. _Availability - Owners of industrial zoned land are not always willing to sell the land for its intended use at a favorable price. For example, 285 acres of industrial land are classified in a land use category, according to County real estate records, thus guaranteeing them a lower assessed value and tax rate. However, they are subject to "roll back" taxes for five preceeding years upon sale of the property. e. Industrial zoning - Roanoke County's Zoning Ordinance includes a variety of uses under the categories of M-1, M-2 and M-3. Basically, M-1 permitted uses are "light" 6 ~-~ I industrial uses generally carried on within a structure. Permitted uses in M-2 are "heavy" and are carried on both within a structure and outside on the property. Quarries, mining and asphalt plans are the only uses allowed in the M-3 District. The permitted uses include not only manufacturing, assembly and processing descriptions, but wholesale business and public utilities. Certain "unwanted" land uses are included in the industrial category, i.e. flea markets, automobile graveyards, veterinary hospitals, commercial kennels, used tire storage. The rezoning records indicate that property is being rezoned to industrial for specific uses. Including rezonings for APCo (36 acres) and Valleypointe (52 acres) in the fall of 1987, only 122 acres have been rezoned to M-1 or M-2 since 1984. Other rezonings to M-1 have been for small business such as: Mini-warehouses Electronic components assembly for South Star Corporation Ceramics shops Automobile repair business American Drum's musical instrument assembly Lumber drying business Contractor's equipment storage yard 7 o-~ f. Future Industrial Sites A study completed by the Salem-Roanoke County Chamber of Commerce in 1980 and updated in 1985 by the County staff indicates that land is zoned for other uses, particularly residential, that could be rezoned and eventually marketed as industrial sites. These sites have excellent potential for residential development. A report will be prepared in July 1989 to analyze and rank selected residential sites and recommend to the Board of Supervisors that they be rezoned to Industrial District M-1. This action could add 1,420 acres to the available industrial-site inventory and protect them from residential development. This acreage combined with improvements in access and extensions of water and sewer could provide the County with sufficient inventory for future economic growth. g. "Ready to go" sites "Ready to go" industrial sites are those sites that have the following characteristics: 1. appropriate industrial zoning 2. Access to adequate roads 3. Water service at site 4. Sewer service at site 5. Available for sale with established price. a- Of all the 2,201 acres currently zoned industrial in Vinton and Roanoke County, only 195.5 acres meet the requirements of being a "ready to go" site. These sites have been recorded with the Virginia Department of Economic Development, Regional Partnership and industrial realtors. Table 2 indicates specifics of these sites. TABLE 2 "Ready to Go" Industrial Sites Site name Acreage Location Zoning Notes Shimchocks 7.8 Hollins Road M1 To be subdivided D & M 7 Peters Creek B1/Ml For lease Leonard Hill 11.4 W. Main Street Ml Sewer to be extended Rt. 11/460 during 1989 Fort Lewis Industrial 11.0 W. Main Street M2 Two 5.5 acre parcels park Krueger Metal Jamison Industrial Park Roanoke/Botetourt Industrial Park Valleypointe 27 Off Rt. 11/460 Ml 4.5 43 55 Austin Tract 4.5 Vinton Industrial Park 19.5 Southwest Industrial 4.8 Park Total 195.5 Plantation Road M1 Route 11/460 East M1 Peters Creek Road M1 I-581 Hollins Road M2 Third Street M1 Vinton Southwest County Ml Krueger wants to retain 17 acres and sell 10 Asking price may be too high Tweeds site (25 ac) is adjacent 12 acres being developed at present park at Valleypointe Vacant Two tracts of 14.5 and 5.0 Two parcels available 9 (~-1 h. Sites having deficiencies Land currently zoned industrial is remaining vacant, indicating that there are other factors affecting its development for the use intended. There are a number of industrial sites in Roanoke County that are less than "ready to go" because of one or more deficiencies. These include 382 acres of industrial zoned land. Table 3 indicates these tracts and the deficiencies that they have. Water and sewer service is not available to some sites and access is a problem for others. However, planning for water and sewer service has progressed for several of these properties. Access improvements for a number of other properties were addressed as the 1988 update of the Six Year Secondary Road plan but received lower ratings as being new projects. Future emphasis on improving both secondary road access and primary roads to serve industrial sites will contribute towards improvement of the inventory of industrial land. Table 3 Sites having Deficiences Site name Acreage Location Zonin Notes Adams Construction 175 I-81 M2/M3 Lacks water, Valleypointe, sewer (Phase II) Hollins College 163 I-81 Ml Lacks water, access Starkey 10.5 Starkey Rd. M2 Lacks water, sewer, access Roanoke Ready Mix 34 Benois Road M1 Lacks water, sewer, access Total acreage 382.5 10 ~~ 2. Marketing Strategy The fiscal year 1989-90 budget contains $23,500 in funds for the economic development staff to initiate a marketing effort, both in state for name recognition and out of state industrial access prospects. This activity includes: a. Preparation of Marketing Materials - In order to effectively market the County, up to date published marketing material is required. This includes a new brochure, community profile and updated material for the marketing book. Three thousand dollars ($3,000) has been identified in the FY 89-90 budget to complete these tasks. b. Advertising - Prior to, and in conjunction with marketing trips out of state, selected advertisements will be made in regional and trade publications to support the prospective efforts. Widespread reference to the All-American City program will highlight the effort. c. Prospect trips - Four out of state marketing trips are scheduled to market Roanoke County and the Valley. The midwest and northeast are preliminary target areas. Trips may be made in conjunction with the Regional Partnership. d. Trade Show Participation - Technology trade shows bring together a variety of companies in one location. The strategy will be to identify expanding industries and seek to have them locate in Roanoke County. 11 e. Economic bridg es with Northern Virginia - Three marketing trips are planned for building " economic bridges" between Northern Virginia and the Roanoke Valley. These will follow up on the Roanoke Valley's visit in September 1988 and two subsequent marketing trips. A return visit from Northern Virginia business leaders is being planned for September 1989. 3. Positive attitude and methods The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors and top administrative officials have a pro-business image that encourages new business locations and local companies to expand. However, this attitude needs to be instilled within the "rank and file" of County staff. Due to many changes in the development process; including fees, County standards and state mandated inspection items, local businesses get frustrated when they seek to obtain permits to expand and enlarge their operations. The availability of information at the onset is needed so that realistic schedules can be developed to complete the project. The following actions are recommended to either be continued, or to be initiated to alleviate "frustration" with the development process. a, informational brochures outlining County requirements and regulations for site plans, building permits b. Scheduling of preliminary meetings to respond to preliminary plans. 12 6- ~ c. Use of economic development staff as "mediators" where conflict and misunderstanding occurs. d. Training of development review team in public relations and understanding of the private developers timing and financing constraints. "Expediting" critical economic development projects to guarantee a five day review period on plans submitted. 4. Full-time staff Success in economic development requires that full-time staff be assigned to the Department of Economic Development in order to carry out the work program approved in the budget. Currently, two professional economic developers and one professional secretary are assigned. This is an increase from 1982 when economic development had one-half time staff emphasis. Starting in 1984, the first full-time staff member was assigned and finally in April 1988, the Economic Development Department was organized with three (3) people assigned full-time duties. Implementation of the approved work program will occupy all three staff members through the next fiscal year in marketing and out of state trips. Support of Roanoke County's efforts at the regional level is provided by County participation in the Regional Partnership and a financial contribution of $68,182. These funds are used for representing and marketing the Roanoke Valley to prospects outside the area. Financial support of $25,000 is provided to the Roanoke Valley 13 D-I Convention and Visitors Bureau for tourism and convention bookings. The Bureau promotes the Valley in travel publications, solicits meeting planners to hold conventions and conferences here and operates a visitor center in the downtown market area. C. Program Recommendations to achieve 75/25 Specific recommendations to change the composition of Roanoke County's tax base to 75$ residential and 25$ commercial/industrial to achieve a balance between the residential and commercial/indus- trial sectors by the year 1995 as follows: 1. Increase the supply of "ready to go" industrial sites by pursuing one of the following alternatives with the $100,000 approved by the Board of Supervisors. a. County participation in the development of a 45 acre site in Eastern Roanoke County. b. County participation in the purchase and development of a 50 acre rail site in Roanoke County. c. County participation in the development of either of two I-81 sites of 50 and 35 acres. d. County participation in the development of a 27 acre industrial site in Western Roanoke County. 14 2. Participation in the Virginia Shell building program to obtain funds to construct a shell building on a site in Roanoke County. 3. Recognize the need for future economic growth by reserving through rezoning to industrial/commercial, prime sites that may be currently zoned as residential or agricultural. A study will be completed during July 1989 and a report made to the Board analyzing and ranking the sites to be rezoned. 4. Formation of an advisory economic development council. 5. Increase in marketing efforts to "sell" Roanoke County both within and outside the Commonwealth of Virginia. D. Ongoing activities in the area of economic development to meet goal of 75$ residential and 25~ commercial/industrrial include: -Completion of Valleypointe, Phase I (55 acres) -County participation in the development of Valleypointe, Phase II, (175 acres). -County marketing of existing, vacant industrial sites in the Vinton Industrial Park, Roanoke-Botetourt Industrial Park and Fort Lewis Industrial Park (100 acres). -Promoting the Explore Project as the tourism destination point of the Roanoke Valley. -Encouraging the development of a travel and tourism "infrastructure" (hotels, motels, and restaurants) in Roanoke County. 15 Prom the desk oP: Lee Garrett ~~ /_~~ ~~~ ~`L 9 0~,~ ~ 1 y a 9 ys fir, ,~4/ Gj MEMO RAND U M TO: Mary Allen FROM: John Hubbard C DATE: June 2, 1989 RE: Appointment to Citizens Advisory Committee At the June 14 meeting, it is requested that Mr. Robers a representative from the Cave Spring area to serve on the Citizens Advisory Committee. ppoint a resignation of Deborah T amorskP~lntment is necessary due to the We have learned that Robert House, 7439 Franklin Road, Boones Mill VA 24065 (989-6826) is willing to serve on the committee and would recommend that he be appointed. JRH:wr ~_L~ ,~y n.-~ _.~_~ ~. ~ pF ~CANC'fF ~> , A G 2 ~ 9 ~ ~ °v as 18 .ESA 88 S~SQU-CENTENN~P~ A Beautr~u/BeAinnln~ COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE C~AItY[f1J Af ~Qc~1tAkP June 26, 1989 Mr. J. Larry Lyons President Cave Spring National Little League 5727 Penguin Drive, S.W. Roanoke, Virginia 24018 Dear Mr. Lyons; BOARD OF SUPERVISORS LEE GARRETT, CHAIRMAN WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT RICHARD W. ROBERS. VICE-CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT STEVEN A. MCGRAW CATA Wgq MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VIN TON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT Enclosed is the Official Proclamation for the 50t Little League Baseball which was signed at the J Board of Supervisors Meetin h Anniversary of returnin g• Per une 14, 1989 g this to you, Your instructions, we are If I can be of assistance in the future, please d to let me know. o not hesitate Sincerely, ~. Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk bjh Roanoke County Board of Enclosure Supervisors ~'O. BOX 29800 -RpAIVOKE. VIRGINIA 24018-07gg (703) 772-20 04 LITTLE LEAGUE 1939--1989 BASEBALL° a_WK O FFICIAL OCL TION Little League Baseball was conceived SO years ago as a program forpr~oviding children the opportunity to learn values of teamwork, sportsrrranship, discipline and responsibility, and WHEREAS: This highly respected international institution hasgrown to become the world's largest organized youth sports o with overt/ million annual partiapants, and `~ dam WHEREAS: Bach year more than 750, 000 adult volunteers, whose only motivation is to provide a wholesome, beneficial atmos h °. f. friendly competitive play, give selflessly of their time ands p ~ for theyoungsters rn thousands ofcommunities, and ervrce WHEREAS: By action of the United States Congress Little League Baseball rs a federally chartered program committed to the mental and development of children during their mostformative e physical y ars, and WHEh:EAS: Byproclamation ofFresidentDwightD. Eisenhower, annuall the second, full week of June ~ pr-oclaimed as National Little League Baseball Wee of the flrsts0yeR~ Little League g~eball re~gnition k' has been designated as the ocial celebration oe k ofJune 12_16,1989 ' f his milestoneyear. funs 1~ 16,1989 as the' r do herebyproclairn the week of Little League Baseball in `~ lp~od celebrating the SOth Anniversary of to su and urge all citizens pportand recognize thisgreatinstitution ofLittleLeague Baseball. OF ~oANC'fF ~ ,~ ~ Z ~ 9 _~ J _ a 18 E50 88 S~SQV~CENTENN~P~' A Beauti~ulBeAinnin~ COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE Mr. Vince Joyce 6039 Marshwren Lane, S,W, Roanoke, Virginia 24018 Dear Mr. Joyce: June 21, 1989 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS LEE GARRETT. CHAIRMAN WIN DSO ^iLLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT RICHARD W ROBERS, VICE-CHAIRMAN CAVE 5~41NG MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON _uNS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT STEVEN A. MCGRAW ~-'<•VBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS ~ 1TON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT The Board of Supervisors have asked me to express on their their sincere appreciation for & Recreation Advisor _ Your previous service to the bParks needs of their communityoandsw llin Cltozens so responsive to the their time are indeed all too scarce,g glue of themselves and This is to advise that at their meeting held on Wednesda 14, 1989, the Board of Supervisors voted unanimously to re you as a member of Parks & Y. June three- Recreation Advisor aPPoint year term. Your term will expire on June 30Co1992sion for a State law provides that an to any body be furnished a Person elected, re-elected, appointed Act; your copy is enclosed copy of the Freedom of Information the Conflicts of Interest Act, We are also sendin g you a copy of On behalf of the Supervisors and the citizens of Roanoke Co please accept our sincere thanks and a unty willingness to accept this a PPreciation for ppointment. Your Very truly yours, - Q~-f,~ Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk bjh Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Enclosures cc: Steve Carpenter, Director Parks & Recreation Department C~ALint~ Ltf ~LiMni1~2P F'.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 2 4018-07 8 8 <7031 772.2004 of a~ANO~'F ~~ z 7~ v a2 18 ~E50 88 SFSDUICENTENN~P~ A Beauti ful Beginning COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE C~nunt,~ of ~nttnnhr June 21, 1989 Mr. Thomas Robertson 803 Ruddell Road Vinton, Virginia 24179 Dear Mr. Robertson: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS LEE GARRETT, CHAIRMAN WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT RICHARD W. ROBERS. VICE-CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT STEVEN A. MCGRAW CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VIN TON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT The Board of Supervisors have asked me to express on their behalf their sincere appreciation for your previous service to the Parks & Recreation Advisory Commission. needs of their community and willin CltoZens so responsive to the their time are indeed all too scarce.g glue of themselves and This is to advise that at their meeting held on Wednesday, June 14, 1989,__the Board of Supervisors voted unanimously to reappoint you as a member of Parks & Recreation Advisory Commission for a three-year term. Your term will expire on June 30, 1992, State law provides that any person elected, re-elected a to any body be furnished a copy of the Freedom of Information Act; your copy is enclosed. We are also sending you a copy of the Conflicts of Interest Act. On behalf of the Supervisors and the citizens of Roanoke County please accept our sincere thanks and appreciation for willingness to accept this appointment, Y our Very truly yours, Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk bjh Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Enclosures cc: Steve Carpenter, Director Parks & Recreation Department P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 2 4018-07 9 8 (703) 772.2004 OF ROANp~~ ~ •~ z p ~ a= 18 E50 $8 S~SQUICENTENN\P\' A Beauti fulBe~inning COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE ~AUntl~ i1 f ~IIMYtII~F Mr. James S. Dyer 540 Missimer Circle Vinton, Virginia 24179 Dear Mr. Dyer: June 21, 1989 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS LEE GARRETT, CHAIRMAN WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT RICHARD W. ROBERS. VICE-CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT STEVEN A. MCGRAW CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VIN TON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT At their regular meeting on Wednesday, June 14, 1989, the Count Board of Supervisors unanimously approved the request of the Vinton Moose Lodge for a permit for a raffle to be held on November 12, 1989, The fee has been paid and your receipt is enclosed You may consider this letter to be be displayed on the premises where theoRafPlemis tonbelconducted. The State Code ' ggest it on a calendar-yea~vbasisththerefore atheingo permits be issued December 31, 1989. This permit, however, ps only valid fo rthe dates specified on your application. If I may be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me at 772-2004. Very truly yours, ~ ~ CZ-~~~ Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors bjh Enclosures CC: Commissioner of the Revenue Commonwealth Attorney County Treasurer P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24018-07 9 8 (703) 772-2004 ~F gOANp~.~ h '~ ~ Z A J 2 a 18 E50 88 sFS~UICENTENNIP~' A BeauG~ulBe~inning COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE Mr. Charles M. Wilson Operations Manager Hills Department Store #54 3971 Brambleton Avenue Roanoke, Virginia 24018 Dear Mr. Wilson: June 21, 1989 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS LEE GARRETT, CHAIRMAN WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT RICHARD W. ROBERS. VICE•CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT STEVEN A. MCGRAW CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VIN TON MAGISTERIAL DI57RICT At their meeting on Wednesday, June 14, 1989, the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors unanimously approved your application for a Fireworks Display Permit. You may consider this letter to be your Permit. Please note that this Permit is being issued on the following condition, which was recommended by Sheriff M. F. Kavanaugh: That Hills be required to employ ten off-duty officers, starting one hour before the fireworks begin and to extend one hour beyond the time that the fireworks end. Six of these officers would be assigned to handle additional traffic on Route 419 and Route 221, and four would be used on the parking lot at Hills Department Store. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Very truly yours, Mary H. Allen Deputy Clerk bjh cc: Sheriff M. K. Kavanaugh Fire Marshall Kenneth R. Sharp Zoning Administrator Claude Lee Hills Department Stores, 15 Dan Road, Canton, Mass 02021 Fireworks Unlimited, Rt 1, Box 257-A, Yancyville, NC 27379 C~nixnt~ a~f ~vttnnke P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 2 4018-07 9 8 (703) 772-2004 pF PCANC'rF ~ ~, L 2 A J ? a y,. 18 f50 88 S~SQ!/ICENTENN~P~ A Beauti ful Beginning COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE C~~un~,~ of ~nttnvkP June 16, 1989 w. Robert Herbert, Chairman Roanoke Regional Airport Commission C/0 City of Roanoke 215 Church Avenue S. W. Roanoke, Virginia 24011 Dear Mr. Herbert: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS LEE GARRETT. CHAIRMAN WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT RICHARD W. ROBERS. VICE-CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT STEVEN A. MCGRAW CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VIN TON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT Attached is a copy of Resolution No. 61489-6 concerning approval for a Noise Study Project by the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission. This resolution was adopted by the Board of Supervisors at their meeting on June 14, 1989. If you need further information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, `n'La-era-, ,~. C~.e..~e.~., Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Attachment P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 2 4018-07 9 8 (703) 772.2004 O~ ROANO,y-F ~ ,F A Z ~ 2 J a ei, 18 E50 88 SFSgU1CENTENN~P A Beawi~ul Beginning COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE June 16, 1989 The Honorable Howard E. Musser, Chairman Roanoke Regional Cable Television Committee C/0 Roanoke City Council 215 Church Avenue S. W• Roanoke, Virginia 24011 Dear Mr. Musser: LEE GARRETT. CHAIRMAN WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT RICHARD W. ROBERS. VICE-CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT STEVEN A. MCGRAW CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT Attached is a copy of Resolution No. 61489-8 concerning authorization to execute a contract for consultant services with 0. D. Page P. E.. This resolution was adopted by the Board of Supervisors at their meeting on June 14, 1989. If you need further information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Attachment C~vun~~ of ~n~nnke BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 2 4018-07 9 8 (703) 772-2004 O~ ROANO'YF ~ ~ Z~ ~~ w a/ ~ 8 E50 $$ SFSQUICENTENN~P~ A Beau~i~ul Beginning C~u~tnt~ of ~nttnnke BOARD OF SUPERVISORS COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE June 16, 1989 The Honorable Howard E. Musser, Chairman Roanoke Regional Cable Television Committee C/O Roanoke City Council 215 Church Avenue S. W. Roanoke, Virginia 24011 Dear Mr. Musser: LEE GARRETT. CHAIRMAN WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT RICHARD W. ROBERS. VICE-CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT STEVEN A. MCGRAW CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT Attached is a copy of Resolution No. 61489-8 concerning authorization to execute a contract for consultant services with 0. D. Page P. E.. This resolution was adopted by the Board of Supervisors at their meeting on June 14, 1989. If you need further information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, ~• Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Attachment P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24018-0798 (703) 772-2004 ~ ~, - r,~„-r ~ lE~ t. ~j~.~ t .f, .' ,- - , .. ~' .~` ~' . ~,~ f '.. il' I ..- ~ti~~~.3-, 1t ~, , . ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ i ;~ , ~. ,~ s NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING CREATION OF A RESOURCE AUTHORITY BY THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE Notice is given that the Board of Supervisors ("Board") of the County of Roanoke, Virginia will hold a public hearing on the adoption of a resolution creating the Roanoke County Resource Authority ("Resolution"). The public hearing, which may be continued or adjourned, will be held at 3:00 o'clock p.m. on June 14, 1989, before the Board at the Roanoke County Administration Center, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, Roanoke, Virginia. The following is the text of the Resolution to be considered by the Board at its meeting on June 14, 1989: ~~~ Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney Please publish once in the Sunday, May 7, 1989, edition of the pape~l - Please send bill to: Ms. Diane Hyatt Board of Supervisors P. 0. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF ROANORE, VIRGINIA CREATING THE ROANORE COUNTY RESOURCE AUTHORITY "Board") of the County of Roanoke, The Board of Supe~isors 'nia ("County") has determined that it is in ~eResource Virgi to create the Roanoke County interest of the County rovisions of the V1rCodeaofaVirginia Authority pursuant to the P Title 15.1, Chapter 28, has been held in Sewer Authorities ActnAct"). A public hearing of 1950, as amended ccordance with the requirements of Sections 15.1-1243 an a 15.1-1250.01 of the Act. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS NOW, VIRGINIA: OF THE COUNTY OF ROANORE, created the There is hereby 1. Creation of Authori~. "puthority") - Roanoke County Resource Authority The Articles of are as 2. Articles of Inco oration•Resource Authority Incorporation of the Roanoke County follows: ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION OF ROp,NORE COUNTY RESOURCE AUTHORITY ARTICLE I shall be Roanoke County Resource The name of the Authority rincipal office is 3738 Authority and the address ofVirginia, 24018. Brambleton Avenue, Roanoke, ARTICLE II orating political subdivision is The name of thVlrginia. County of Roanoke, ARTICLE III names, addresses and terms Countf1ResourceeAuthority The members of the Board of the Roanoke ("Authority") are as follows: Name Lee Garrett Bob L. Johnson Harry C. Nickens Steven A. McGraw Richard W. Robers Add_ ress The address of each initial member is: P. O. Box 29800 3738 B ~Virginiav24018 Roanoke, Term Ex fires 12 31 89 12/31/89 12/31/89 12/31/91 12/31/91 r The terms of office of such initial members shall begin on the date of issuance of a.certificate of incorporation or charter for the Authority by the State Corporation Commission. The successor of each member shall be appointed for a term of four years by the Board of Supervisors ("Board") of the County of Roanoke, Virginia, except that any person appointed to fill a vacancy shall serve only for the unexpired term. ARTICLE IV The purposes for which the Authority is created are to exercise all the powers granted to the Authority under the Virginia Water and Sewer Authorities Act, Chapter 28, Title 15.1, Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended ("Act"). The inclusion of preliminary estimates of capital costs, project proposals and rates for services in the Articles of Incorporation is impracticable. ARTICLE V The Authority shall serve the County of Roanoke, and, to the extent permitted by the Act and by the terms of such contracts as the Authority may approve, the Cities of Roanoke and Salem, the Town of Vinton and such other public or private entities as the Authority may determine upon the terms and conditions established pursuant to such contracts. 3. Sanitary Landfill Operation. The Board hereby finds that (i) privately owned sanitary landfill services are not available in a reasonable and cost-efficient manner and (ii) operation by the Roanoke County Resource Authority of a sanitary landfill and any related facilities or the contract for such operation in spite of any potential anti-competitive effect, is important in order to provide for the development and/or operation of a regional system of garbage and refuse collection and disposal for the County of Roanoke, the Cities of Salem and Roanoke and the Town of Vinton and such other governmental units or private entities as the Authority may determine. 4. Effective Immediately. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption. The foregoing constitutes a true and correct copy of a resolution duly adopted by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia at a meeting duly called and held on June 14, 1989, and such resolution has not been repealed, revoked or rescinded and remains in full force and effect on the date hereof. 1 TELECOPY INFORMATION May 3, 1989 T0: Name: Martha Plank Firm: Roanoke Times and World News Location: Legal Ad Department Telecopy No: 981-3365 No. of Pages: 4 FROM: Name: Susan Gubala Firm: Roanoke County, Virginia ° Location: 3738 Brambleton Avenue P. 0. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 Telecopy No: (703) 772-2030 Telephone No: (703) 772 2007 To Date WHILE YOU M Time WERE OUT - _ - of -- Phone No. Area Code - -- --- ~ -- Number Extension RETURNED YOUR CALL Message --- WYWO 45 Operator TELEPHONED PLEASE CALL CALLED TO SEE YOU WILL CALL AGAIN WANTS TO SEE YOU URGENT ~ ~ ~? ''•~ Date ~~~' Time WHILE YOU WERE OUT M i`~ ~~&~~~ ~~ ! n n~0~,t t '~ ;~ ~ 4r" ~~- ~" r Phone No. -~-- Area Code Number Extension TELEPHONED PLEASE CALL CALLED TO SEE YOU WILL CALL AGAIN WANTS TO SEE YOU URGENT RETURNED YOUR CALL Message ~ +~- Cx.ta ~ ~,~~s~~,_ _. Operator WYWO 45 RR/SAM TO APPROVE AYES-BLJ. ~• SAME HCN ABSTAIN-LG 589-7 HCN/BLJ TO APPROVE URC Board of Petition of the Roanoketo°amend the Future Land Supervisors requesting arcel Use Plan Map to include a 1.5 ofrgaPem designated presently located in the City n appropriate as Tax Map Parcel 240-4-1. andromsagboundary line zoning designation resulti1g 1989. relocation effective July O, PUBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING OF ORDINANCE and Ordinance amending Chapter ~, 589-8 Public Hearing Code by Buildin Re ulations of the RoanoandCincreasing the Addition of Article V, Fees, same. SAM/BLJ TO APPROVE 1ST READING 2ND - 6/14/89 - URC Public Hearing and Ordinance to increase the 589-9 salaries of membersuanttto Sectaonf3SOpeoflthes o Roanoke County pars Roanoke County Charter and Section 14.1-46.01 0 the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended. HCN/SAM TO APPROVE 1ST READING 2ND - 6/14/89 - URC AYES: BLJ,I~,SAM•HCN NAYS: LG p, PUBLIC HEARING AND SECOND READING OF ORDINANCE the 589-10 Public Hearing and Ordinance authorizing issuance of not to exceed $47me000fo~nd~hool finance the purchase of equ P and rescinding purposes and Ordinance repealing ordinance 41189-1a1WObligationrBondstto financee of $440,000 Gener ur oses. the purchase of equipment for school p P 0-52389-6 - URC HCN/BLJ TO APPROVE ORD. 0-52389-7 BLJ/HCN TO RESCIND ORD. 41189-10 - URC 3. Recognition of Roanoke County's All America City Award from the Roanoke Regional Chamber of .Commerce. C. THOM ROBINSON, EXEC. VICE PRESIDENT PRESENTED RESOLUTION OF CONGRATULATIONS D. NEW BUSINESS 1. Presentation on All America City Recognition. 2. Additional funding request from the 1985 Road Bond. A-52389-3 BLJ/HCN TO APPROVE URC 3. Approval of Parks and Recreation Plans for the Glenvar area. A-52389-4 HCN/BLJ TO APPROVE AYES-BLJ, HCN, LG NAYS-RR,SAM E. REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS NONE F. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS NONE G. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance appropriating funds for the 1989-90 fiscal year budget for Roanoke County. HCN/RR TO APPROVE 1ST READING WITH ~5 IN ORDINANCE AMENDED THAT ANY OPERATING SHORT FALL NOT COME OUT OF THE CAPITAL FUND BUT FROM THE SCHOOL OPERATING FUND - URC 2ND READING - 6/14/89 2. Ordinance authorizing the construction of a public water system to serve a special water service area 2 the Shadwell~Drive in estate along Estates subdivisions. real Bellevue certain abutting includingGardens and osed upon funds therefor, Bellview thereof to be imp rovlding The costs agreement, p f this ordinance be .property ownertha an abstract ° will be assessed and directing the amount that recorded showing landowner. against each such PROVE 1ST READING 2ND/HC6/1~/8 - URC IN4UIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS NORTHERN VIRGIN TO H. REPORTS A~ VISITS FROM MINISTRATOR PLANS ARE PROCEEDING (2) ASKED CO OF E~pgLISHING CTED ROB~ER.~ (1) MP,SON UNIVERSITYTHE POSSIBILITY GARRETT DIRE GEORGE BLACKSBURG • (3) ~NOUrICED THROUGH CERTAIN INDIVIDUALS HIGHWAY TO TO BOARD• LOPMENT CONTACT ON PROPOSED REPORT BACK ECONOMIC DEVE "SMART HIGHWAY ET WITH DEVELOPMENT - (4) STUDY POSSIBILITY IA~E TO ME USING g TO COMM ECONOMIC SSES STAF TION OF ADVISORY S FOR CONTINUED LETTER TO BUSIE DIFFERENT FORMA ~D DEVELOP PLAN SUPPORT TO SEND Tp,RILY STED STAFF FOR BOARD T THEY VOB~ (41 HAS RE4ME RR/HCN MOTION RS ASKING Tom' CHOICE OF LE CONTAINS SAM,HNC~LG, NAYS: SYSTEMS AME DISPOSE p,YES : ~~ SCHOOL p,ND CONSOLIDATION PACKAGING: CHOICES FORTO SCHOOL BOARD I~,pRMATION CONCERNING WILL GIVE SCHOOLS FOR PARENTS F ~p OLVER COMMITTEE. FROM THE STAF USE OF THE ONE- NEGOTIATING I~,ORMATION EFFORTS AND SITE. ASKED CYCLING BILL ASKED FOR MORE CURRENT LAND THE MC_ G_~ OF SPEEDING USE ~ TME CONCERN p'T ITTEE CONCERNING COSTS SE THE EXPRESSED D BANDIT TO INKKC REPORT. (2) NEGOTIATING CO ARMEE. TO BRING BAC THE CONSOLIDATION CONSIDER TO BLJRA/~ TO ME WAS DISCUSSED IN STAF NT OF p, NEW MEMBERTO p,TTEND. ISSUE ~ppIMEETING HE WP'S ~~TT. MOTION WITHD NT OF LEE GARRE AppOINTME SESSION. EXECUTIVE O`~ ROANp~~ a ~~ ~~ J b:: ~Z 18 Eso 88 ~FSQtJlCENT~NN~~~ A BeautifulBeginning COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE C~nixn~~ of ~nttnvkr MEMO RAN D U M T0: Me~mb~e~s of the Board of Supervisors FROM: Elmerdd C. Hodge County Administrator DATE: May 19, 1989 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS LEE GARRETT. CHAIRMAN WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT RICHARD W. ROBERS, VICE-CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT STEVEN A. MCGRAW CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C.NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT Attached is a resolution from Roanoke City expressing concern over the problem of drug and alcohol abuse and requesting that other Roanoke Valley localities assist in providing adequate funding for renovation of the Mental Health Services of the Roanoke Valley's Alcohol Detoxification and Rehabilitation Center. Roanoke City has committed $84,000.00 in CDBG funds only. They have not committed funds from their budget. Roanoke County funds Mental Health Services of the Roanoke Valley through the budget process. I suggest a resolution of concern for drug and alcohol abuse and support for the project, but no commitment for funds. Please let me have your comments. mha P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 2 4018-07 9 8 (703) 772-2004 ~, ,, ~ a E VIRGINIA CHARTERED 1A82 May 10, 1989 File #75-22 Mr. Elmer C. Hodge Roanoke County Administrator P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, Virginia 24018-0798 Dear '~fr. Hodge: C3ffice of the Gry Clerk I am enclosing copy of Resolution No. 29551 expressing concern over the problem of drug and alcohol abuse in the Roanoke Valley area and calling upon the City of Salem and the Counties of Botetourt and .Roanoke, participants along with the City of Roanoke, in Mental Health Services of the Roanoke Valley, to recognize and address the immediate need to provide adequate funding for the renovation of the Mental Health Services of the Roanoke Valley's Alcohol Detoxification and .Rehabilitation Center, which Resolution No. 29551 was adopted by the Council of the City of Roanoke at a regular meeting held on Monday, ltilay 8, 1989. Sincerely, ,!~~ Mary .F. Parker, CMC City Clerk MFP : r a Enc. pc: Trlr. W. Kobert Herbert, City Manager Room 456 Municipal Duildinq 215 Church Avenue, S.W. Roanoke, Virginia 24011 (703) 989-2541 ,. IN THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA, The 8th day of May, 2989. No. 29551. A RESOLUTION expressing concern over the problem of drug and alcohol abuse in the Roanoke Valley area and calling upon the City of Salem and the Counties of Botetourt and Roanoke, parti- cipants along with the City of Roanoke, in Mental Health Services of Roanoke Valley, to recognize and address the immediate need to provide adequate funding for the renovation of the Mental Health Services of the Roanoke Valley's Alcohol Detoxification and Rehabilitation Center. WHEREAS, the Mental Health Services of the Roanoke Valley has operated said Alcohol and Detoxification and Rehabilitation Center, located at 801 Shenandoah Avenue, N.W., for fifteen pears; and WHEREAS, this facility is the Roanoke Valley's only residential facility for low-income residents with substance abuse problems; and WHEREAS, in order to significantly address the issue of drug and alcohol abuse on a regional basis, through development and expansion of education and awareness programs, prevention and treatment programs, and enhancement of other related substance abuse services, the Mental Health Services of the Roanoke Valley has undertaken the renovation of its Alcohol Detoxification and Rehabilitation Center at a total projected cost of $256,876.00; and WHEREAS, upon completion of the renovation project in October 1989, said Alcohol Detoaification and Rehabilitation Center will be upgraded and fully licensed to provide over 5,800 bed days for low-income individuals annually; and WHEREAS, this Council will appropriate $84,000.00 in Commun- ity Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds toward said renovation project; and WHEREAS, the Mental Health Services Board has requested addi- tional funds for the project from the City of Salem and Counties of Botetourt and Roanoke. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roanoke that: 1. This Council adopts this means of expressing its deep concern over the current problem of drug and alcohol abuse in the Roanoke Valley area and calls upon the City of Salem and Counties of Botetourt and Roanoke, as jurisdictions served by the Mental Health Services of the Roanoke Valley, to provide adequate funding for the renovation of said Alcohol Detoaification and Rehabilitation Center. 2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to forthwith transmit attested copies of this resolution to the appropriate officials of the City of Salem and Counties of Botetourt and Roanoke. ATTEST: ~-~---, ~ G`~ City Clerk. O~ ROANp~.~ ~. .~ Z o a? 8 ~~ $8 sFSQU1CEN7ENN~P~ A Beauti~u/ Bcginning COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE .• T0: FROM: DATE: (~nuntg of ~Rattnukr M E M O R A N D U M M ~ Geis of the Board of Supervisors Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator May 19, 1989 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS LEE GARRETT. CHAIRMAN WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT RICHARD W. ROBERS. VICE-CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT STEVEN A. MCGRAW CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT Attached is a resolution from Roanoke City expressing concern over the problem of drug and alcohol abuse and requesting that other Roanoke Valley localities assist in providing adequate funding for renovation of the Mental Health Services of the Roanoke Valley's Alcohol Detoxification and Rehabilitation Center. Roanoke City has committed $84,000.00 in CDBG funds only. They have not committed funds from their budget. Roanoke County funds Mental Health Services of the Roanoke Valley through the budget process. I suggest~a resolution of concern for drug and alcohol abuse and support for the project, -but no commitment for funds. Please let me have your comments. mha P.O. BOX 29800 • ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 2 4018-07 9 8 (703) 772-2004 Offke of the City Gerk VIRGINIA CHARTERED 1882 day lo, 1s8s File #76-22 Mr. Elmer C. Hodge Roanoke County Administrator P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, Virginia 24018-0798 Dear Mr. Hodge: I am enclosing copy of Resolution No. 29551 expressing concern over the problem of drug and alcohol abuse in the Roanoke Valley area and calling upon the City of Salem and the Counties of Botetourt and Roanoke, participants along with the City of Roanoke, in Mental Health Services of the Roanoke Valley, to recognize and address the immediate n~:ed to provide adequate funding for the renovation of the Menta~i Health Services. of the Roanoke Valley's Alcohol Detoxification and Rehabilitation Center, which Resolution No. 29551 was adopted by the Council of the City of Roanoke at a regular meeting held on Monday, May 8, 1989. a /~~ Sincerely, -~ . ~ ~~. y~~_ ~ _ - ---- -- -- _ Mary F. Parker, CMC - - City Clerk __ _ --_--- MFP : r a Enc. pc: Mr. W. Robert Herbert, City Manager Boom 456 Municipal building 215 C}TUrch Avenue. 5 W. Roanoke. Virginia 24011 (703) 981-2541 ~ ~• ,4 r ~~~ IN THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROANOKB, VIRGINIA, The 8th day of May, 1989. No. 29552. A RESOLUTION expressing concern over:the problem o! drug and alcohol abuse in the Roanoke Valley area and calling upon the City o! Salem and the Counties o! Botetourt and Roanoke, parti- cipants along with the City o! Roanoke, in Rental Health Services o! Roanoke Valley, to recognize and address the immediate need to provide adequate funding for the renovation o! the Rental Health Services of the Roanoke Valley's Alcohol Detoxilication and Rehabilitation Center. WHEREAS, the Rental Health Services o! the Roanoke Valley has operated said Alcohol and Detoxilication and Rehabilitation Center, located at 801 Shenandoah Avenue, N.W., for !ilteen years; and WHEREAS, this facility is the Roanoke Valley's only residential facility for low-income residents with. substance,-_ --- =_-=-- abuse problems; and WHEREAS, in order to significantly address the issue o! drug and alcohol abuse on a regional basis, through development and expansion o! education and awareness programs, prevention and treatment programs, and enhancement of other related substance abuse services, the Rental Health Services o! the Roanoke Valley has undertaken the renovation o! its Alcohol Detoxification and Rehabilitation Center at a total projected coat o! $256,876.00; and NONE N. REPORTS BLJ/LG TO RECEIVE AND FILE URC WITH SAM ABSENT 1. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance 2. General Fund Unappropriated Balance 3. Board Contingency Fund 0. WORK SESSION 1. 75/25 Economic Development Strategy HCN/BLJ TO SCHEDULE A WORK SESSION 6/14/89 URC WITH SAM ABSENT BLJ REQUESTED REPORT WITH RECOMMENDATIONS PRIOR WORK SESSION P. EXECUTIVE SESSION pursuant to the Code of Virginia Section 2.1-344 NONE RR REQUESTED ASSISTANCE FOR CITIZEN WHO PURCHASED HOME AND LATER FOUND OUT PROPERTY WAS ZONED INDUSTRIAL AND CANNOT GET FINANCING. REQUESTED STAFF TO WORK TOWARD A SOLUTION. Q. ADJOURNMENT AT 6:00 P.M. BLJ/HCN TO ADJOURN - UW 7 r ~ BIRD. KINDER & HUFFMAN JENNII ~~C.J ~~~ ~ ~m ~J CARR DONA ROBEI LEA L. MALC( `~~/~[ '~'. KEN NI /v~ ~ ~' y~ ~~, ~~~-,,, ppp O'--7~J 'mil C3 (~~ ~ C~_~J . -~-. `2- 5/9 _.~r... ....._ r ~ ' ._.~... ... _.. .. ... The Honorable Ray D. Pethtel Commonwealth Transportation Commission Department of Transportation 1401 E. Broad Street Richmond, Virginia 23219 ~, ~C.t, ~~ {~':~~ ~ " t TELEPHONE (703)982-1755 MAILING ADDRESS= P. O. BOX 2795 ROANOKE, VA 24001-2795 Re: Damage to Real Estate in Deer Run Estates, Roanoke County, Virginia at 942 Starmount Avenue John D. Kelly and Beverly N. Kelly Gentlemen: Our firm is representing Mr. and Mrs. Kelly in reference to damages they have sustained from drainage of surface water on their land. The damage was sustained in April 1988 when waters came through a drainage pipe onto their land. We brought-suit against F & B Developers, .one of -the subdividers who is draining water through this pipe. (^1e have been advised that this method of drainage was dictated to them by Roanoke County and the Virginia Department of Highways. In addition, we are advised that Roanoke County is also discharging drainage runoff through the pipe involved. A check of the pertinent records in Roanoke County indicates that there is no easement for anyone to discharge the drainage upon Mr. and Mrs. Kelly's land. W~""`~are h'er~eby maki'n"~~`°~ttag~n~~`~~ok~~~~~ft~it'y' ~gndt~the°~~epartment '~~j~''~~'~iis'pii ior~''~or`~h~`~iJdCC!f,f $9`~'$20:00~'`'+the cost of repairing damage already existing and Board of Supervisors The Honorable Ray D. Pethtel March 2, 1989 Page 2 preventing future damage. An itemized statement is attached hereto. Very truly yours, BIRD, KINDER & HUFFMAN -~ Carr L. Kinder, Jr. CLK:dlf:s/G130 Enclosure r PROPOSAL P.g~ 1 °r ' u.s. cons~RUCT~on coo 1117 WESTSIDE BLVD. ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 29017 TELEPHONE: 703-563-9098 PHON6 DATE PROPOSAL SUBMITTID TO 366-2833 January 19, 1989 ATTN: John D. Kelly STREET JOB NAM o e Roan^~° VA 24019 ARCHITECT DATE OF PLANS JOII PHONE WLF pQOpOS~ hereby to furnish material and labor - complete in accordance ~~rith specifications below, for the sum of: ~~ thousana Piaht hundred twenty and 00/~00 dollars-------5 9 8 ?.0 .0 0. Poyrt~cnt to begin na follown: w All material is guaranteed to be as specified. All wrk to be completed inn wrkmanlike manner nccording to standard prncticee. Any nlteration or deviation from specifications below involving extra costa will be executod only upon written orders, and will become an extra charge over and above the entimnte. All ngreemente contingent upon strikes, occident or delays beyond our control. Owner to curry fire, tornado and other necessary insurance. Our workers are fully covered by Workmen's Compensation Insurance. i Authorized ~• ~ f~ , l Signature Note: This proposal may be withdrawn by us if not accepted within days. We hereby submit specifications and estimates for: *Excavate a 1~0' trench for new 12" corrugated metal drainage pipe. *get new pipe and backfill. Topsoil and seeding. will be included. *Demolitioationanecessarybforktielbackstinatheedirtabagkdover the the exca culvert. *Construction of new 8" common brick wall similar to existing in style and shape. *Al1 necessary fill and grading including hauling of excess debris. ACCBPTAHCB OF PJtOP03AL - The above prices, specifications and conditions are satisfactory and are hereby accepted. You are authorized to do the Signature wrk as epeclfied. Payment will be made as outlined above. pate of Acceptance gignnture V~ PpANp~F a ~ A z a 18 '~ 88 BESOUICEHTENN~P --~ faar.taLl Bc[fnn:rc5 COUNTY AJMiNISTRATOR ELti'ER C 'r-O:~GE T0: (~vun~~ n~ ~nttn~l:e M E M O RAN D U M Tommy Fuqua Fire and Rescue Chief BOARD OF SUPERVISORS LEE GARRET CHAIRMAN .. `DSD= " ___< v4 ; S'c= -_ D'S-=ACT .<.C..aRD `V. R05ER5. VICE-CHAiPti4AN _ .= 5~'~`C Ntw ~STE'.4~ D6'^~CT B05 L^ JOHNSON ~C__~s v4:, SAE= ~~ D~°-=ACT STEVEN A- MCG`*AW -_.._: Vc3:5~==..4_ DST=ACT H AR~Z ~' C NiCKcNS ..~'O~. W4G 5-~= 4 D:~'=iCT FROM; Mary H. Allen Deputy Clerk D~; F;; May 31, 1989 SUBJECT: Agenda Items June 14th Agenda Mr. Hodge would like you to prepare an agenda item for the June 14th board meeting concerning the Town of Vinton's request for the additional paid fire and rescue personnel. Please include in the board report why the Town of Vinton has a need for the additional personnel, and the funding source for the $50,000 appropriation. P.lso, Roanoke County has received a request for a $50,000 contribution to the future Julian Stanley Wise museum. Attached is a letter explaining the request in greater detail. Mr. Hodge plans to place this request on the June 14th agenda. He feels that one way to raise funds adrealls.coHerwould likeuyoubeinput a fee structure for rescue squ into this suggestion. If you need further clarification about either item, please contact me. mha pr, F?OX 2oa00 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24018-0798 t703) 772-2004 COUNTY OF ROANOKE MEMORANDUM ~~.~ T0: Mr. Elme odge Chief Fuqua FROM: May 21, 9 9 DATE: SUBJECT: Paid Personnel - Vinton request for the Town of Vinton and Equipment I have discussewith the Personnel they see As requested, aid personnel the request, however, for P orts roved for funding The Committee suPP ositions already aPP Committee. the five (5) P this as an addition to in FY 89-90. is there a possibility of funding apPrOPriated, would be required for If so, $50,000 this Since there is noropriation. Your consideration of 25,000 for half year. an addit tiara ora $P a full i.s greatly appreciated. matter ps c: CommitteeLmembeua Chief B. Fuq Carilion Health System ILION Test once li~X T3~Z~ ~~ Roanoke, Virginia 24036-3727 'Telephone 703-981-71 L6 1 ji'c 7~i ~t .)~'T'It'117 I. H. Hi mer.+nti!~ Executive Vice President 'April 20, 1989 ~,~.r' Mr. Elmer Hodges Roanoke County Administrator Roanoke County Administration Center 3738 Brambleton Avenue Roanoke, VA 24018 Dear Elmer: ou Wednesday, ou for allowing Sig Davidson and me to valise museum story and its Thank Y us to tell you the Julian Stanley and allowing the reason for the visit was to request Roanoke County needs. Obviously funds for the creation of the exhibit mentioned a ove'escue squad movement has always shown great pride in their r and dollars. Roanoke County and has supported the volunteer crews in both leadership this ainl as we think of areas where we can function as one valley, Cert Y cause fits the ticket. not only being A realistic vision of the futlunteerlRescueRSquadeAssoceation, ortant state headquarters for the Vo You are an imp meetings, etc., but also national headquarters•,s support is essential in spoke in making this wheel run - Roanoke County making this vision a reality. outlines le brochure which sdescribes the exhibit Please also note the enclosed s~mvement, and briefly the founding of the lifesaving we believe is needed and justified for our valley• 1 completed While our 1.8 million dollar budget is bold, a recent Y oal was professional, preliminary fund-raising survey indicated our g attainable. we mentioned to you on Wednesday, we already have the following As support: roved (this past islature app 1. Governor Baliles budgeted and the leg money to be draw in $100,000 increments session) $500,000 in matching beginning July 1, 1989. Mr. Elmer Hodges April 20, 1989 Page 2 erbert, Roanoke City Manager, has indicated up tou$50r~00~s 2. Bob H tically expect substantial funds from the C~ y ve also pledged 3. In the meantime, two leading local corporations ha $25,000 each. est Roanoke County consider and approve at least S5Q,0~• It is vur reQu ro riatiort~. We will also seek We considerSalem anduVinton~ne t ~p P funds from ear before Roanoke ested, both Sig and I would be pleased to app As you sugg eal for these funds. County's Board of Supervisors in an app Again, thank you for your time, advice and interest. Best regards, -' ~ `~ I, B. Heinemann President Julian Stanley Wise Foundation cc: Enclosure f ~ 1 ~, ,,vvw-~t, ~. "~' `~. .~ ~~,~ , ~~ ~ ,~, ~~'~,~~ ~~~ .~-` , ~~,,,,,~ -mss ~ .~ __ ~.,~ ~ ~~ ~'~ ~ AOAN ,~,~ ti ~ ~ v Z a ~8 8$ sF~QU1CENTENN~P~ A Bcauti~ul8cginning COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE T0: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: C~nixn~~ n~ ~vttnn~r M E M O R A N D U M George Garretson Library Director Mary H. Allen ~L~"~'`~ Deputy Clerk April 27, 1989 Change of Meeting Date Board of Supervisors Meeting BOARD OF SUPERVISORS LEE GARRETT. CHAIRMAN WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT RICHARD W. ROBERS. VICE-CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLUNS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT STEVEN A. MCGRAW CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT The June 13th meeting of the Board of Supervisors has been rescheduled to June 14th because the Administration Center Community Room will be used as a precinct for the Republican Primary. Would you please post the attached resolution in a prominent place at the headquarters library and each branch library. Thank you very much for your assistance in this matter. P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24018-0798 (703) 772-2004 COMMITTEE VACANCIES IN 1989 JANE= Youth and Famil Council/ Court~Service Unit Advisor dvisor Board will Services A Vinton District, term of Hoyt C. Rat'n. Two year expire 1/26/89- FEB=Y the Courts Board - A ointed b Electoral will expire Mrs. May Johnson Three year term of 2/28/89. MARS Youth and Famil Unit Advisor Council/ Court Service Board Services Advisor Cave Spring District. Trout, S ring District, and James 22 89. Two year terms of James L' will expire 3/ / Red R. Powell- Cave P Sanders, Windsor Hills District, Lea ue of Older Americans f Webb Johnson, County Representative, One year term 31/89• will expire 3/ e of Circuit J_U~ _ p, ointed b Jud Board of Zonin A eals Co_~ ( 30/89- Neil W- Owen will expire / Five Year term of mmission Fifth Plannin District Co p,nderson W, Robers, Fred terms of Richard and Executive Three Year Citizen Representative and John HubbardX ire 6/30/89• e Committee will Advisor Commission narks & Recreation g ring District- Cave P Hollins District, and Thomas Three year terms of Vince Joyc - ire 6/30/89• Alice Gillesp1e~ District, will exp Robertson, Vinton SEPTEMBER Council/Youth and Famil Court Service Unit Advisor Services Advisor Board William Byrd, Glenvar S ring, be appointed. Youthand Northside High Sphools to Hlgh Industrial Develo ment Authorit g• Branch, Cave Spring illy ard, Vinton District will Four year terms of B Viny District, and W. Darnall expire 9/26/89• Grievance Panel 27 89. ar term of Kim Owens will expire 9/ / Two Ye NO~ BER Health De artment Board of Directors rm of Susan Adcock will expires 11/26/89• Two year to DECEMBER Lib-Board rm of Richard Kirkwood, Hollins District, ear te12/21/89• Mr. Kirkwood resigned 12/88. Four y will expire Community ntal Health Services of the Roanoke Valle - Me Services Board a ointee, will ear term of Sue Ivey, County PP Three y expire 12/31/89• Conunission Roanoke Count Plannin Wayland Winstead, Catawba District, Four year term of x ire 12/31/89• will e P Committee Re Tonal Partnershi Site Advisor rm of Charles Saul will expire 12/21/89' Three year to 2 ROAN ,~, ti p Z a~ 18 .'~~ 88 sFSQU1CEN7EHN~P~' A Bcauti~ul Beginning COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE T0: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: C~nuntg of ~Rnttnnkr M E M O R A N D U M Elizabeth Stokes Clerk of Circuit Court Mary H. Allen ,~y~h~ Deputy Clerk April 27, 1989 Change of Meeting Date Board of Supervisors Meeting BOARD OF SUPERVISORS LEE GARRETT. CHAIRMAN WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT RICHARD W. ROBERS. VICE-CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT STEVEN A. MCGRAW CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT The June 13th meeting of the Board of Supervisors has been. rescheduled to June 14th because the Administration Center Community Room will be used as a precinct for the Republican Primary. Would you please post the attached resolution in a prominent place at the Courthouse. Thank you very much for your assistance in this matter. P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24018-0798 (703) 772-2004 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 28, 1989 RESOLUTION 22889-4 RESCHEDULING A REGULAR t MEETING SCHEDULED FOR JUNE 13, 1989 WHEREAS, by Resolution 1489-2 adopted on January 4, ].989, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County established a regular meeting schedule for the Board of Supervisors for calen- dar year 1989; and WHEREAS, a primary election will be held on June 13, 1989, a date previously scheduled for a regular meeting of the Board. NOW, '1'EIEREFORE, be it resolved by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That Resolution 1489-2 establishing a certain regu- lar meeting schedule for the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors is hereby amended by canceling the meeting scheduled for June 13, 1989; and 2. That the meeting scheduled for June 13, 1989, is hereby rescheduled to Wednesday, June 14, 1989, at 3:00 p.m. at the Roanoke County Administration Center at 3738 Brambleton Ave- nue; and 3. That the County Administrator shall cause a copy of this Resolution to be posted at the Roanoke County Courthouse, the Roanoke County Administration Center, and each County 1 i brary, and to be acl~.~~,r t ised in the Roanoke 'I' i mes and World _ News on May 30, 1989, and June 6, 1.989. On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor I~obcrs, and carried by the Collowing recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None cc: File A COPY TESTE: .~ Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board oL Supervisors Paul Mahoney, County Attorney 2 Airport Commission W. Robert Herbert, Chairman Lee Gorrett, Vice Chairman Joel M. Schlanger Bob L. Johnson Kit B. Kiser Robert C. Poole, Airport Manager ~~~..~. March 28, 1989 1635 Aviation Drive Roanoke,Virginia 24012 (703) 981-2531 _..v _. ~~ AIRP'OKf Honorable Chairman and Members Honorable Mayor and Members Roanoke City Council Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Dear Members of Council: Dear Members of the Board: Subject: Roanoke Regional Airport FAR Part 150;,Noise Study As ou are aware, Section 17(b) of the contract between the City of y and the Airport Commission requires any capital Roanoke, Roanoke County, roved by the Council of the City of expenditure over $100,000 be app Roanoke and the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County. Resolution No. 89-006, adopted by the Roanauthorgzedathelfiling and Counnission at their meeting of March 15, 198ant documents on behalf of execution of certain Part 150 Noise Study g the Commission witortheinetheaattached reportnistration, as more particularly set f uest that the governing body of This letter is to respectfully req roving the Roanoke City an~u eab kthe°RoanokecRegionalaAirporttCommission of capital expends y The federal $180,000 necessary to conduct a Part 150 Noise Study. government is expected to reimburse the Commission for 807. of the cost of the Noise Study. Thank you very much for your assistance. Respectfully submitted, ~~ ~-~.~ W. Robert Herbert Commission Chairman WRH: afm Attachment cc: Legal Counsel ~ Airport Manager Airport Engineer d A~ Roanoke, Virginia March i5, 1989 Chairman and Members rt Commission Roanoke Regional Airpo Dear Members of the Commission. Subject: Airport Koise Study Baca°-end' new noise stuffy every five I. - A. Ai~rt is reQuired u~rementct a s ecial condition of the wa s a P (5) years, This req Runway Extension Grants_ ADAP 13, AIP O1 and 02 Ser_ rt Mana er advertised for Engineering and Planning B, Air~• Noise Study. vices for a , ast to meet Noise studies that have been condubeen limitedpto: C' rant conditions have the special g 1, Study of Flight Tracks • 2, Field Monitoring of Noise Levels 3, Development of Noise Contour Maps will meet and exceed special grant Stud William A. Whittle, FAA, FAR Part 150 Noise ~ D• See attached letter to conditions. ( and response to Commissioner Kiser ) Delta Associates P.E., Inc. was received'Miller 6 Hanson Inc. as subcon- E, One (1) res onse Miller, together with Harris, erience)- see attached qualifications and exp sultans ( work and cost Ne otiations have been conducted as to scope of F. of services. Commission needs to authorize t e lication with the FAA and II. Current situation is thfileha grant app for a FAA Part 150 Commission Chairman to for funding Virginia Department of Aviation Noise Study. III. Ism S= A, Fundin g, Public Involvement C, Timin Page 2 IV. Alternatives: A_ Authorize the Commission Chairman to_ - File grant applications with the FAA aRd Virginia DOA for a Part 150 Noise Study. - Execute any grant agreements or amendments with the FAA and Virginia DOA Eor a Noise Study. 1. Funding would be provided by an 80X Federal gran[ and 20X Airport Commission. Due to commitment of state funds to the Terminal Complex, no state grant is expected. If state funds were to be received, the grant could be expected to be 10X. 2. Public Involvement will be considerable throughout the Noise Study. (See attached program outline and suggested makeup of Noise Advisory Committee.) 3. Timin is expected to take 24 months from the notice to proceed to receipt of the final report. B. Do not authorize the Commission Chairman to file grant appli- cations or execute a contract to prepare a ,tioise Study. 1. Fundin would not be needed. 2. Public Involvement would not be an issue. 3. Timing for completing a new Noise Study would be lost. The Commission commitment as a special condition of the ADAP 13, AIP O1 and 02 would still exist. V. Recommendation is that the Airport Commission approve Alternative ~~An A. Commission Chairman be authorized to file grant applications with the FAA and Virginia DOA for a Part 15U Noise Study. B. Commission Chairman be authorized to execute any grant offers made by the FAA and Virginia DOA and any amendments to those grant offers, subject to the approval of this project by Roanoke city Council and Roanoke County Board of Supervisors. C. Authorize the Commission Chairman to send a copy of this report to Roanoke City Council and Roanoke County Board of Supervisors and, by letter of transmittal, request the appro- val of their governments as required by the agreement between the Commission, the City and the County. 4u Robert Fterbert Ct~rman Lee Gorrett . Joel M. Schlar~ger Bob L. Johnson Kit B. Kiser Robert C. Poole. airportManager Ilecember I9, I988 Mr_ William A. Whittle, Manager Washington Airports District Office Federal Aviation Administration 900 South Washington Street Falls Church, VA 22046 Dear Mr. Whittle: Re: Noise Study - Roanoke Regional Airport Roanoke, Virginia ~.~.. r~viV l~~~ ,.;PVC Roano-~e.virg~n~a 2~z0't2 (703) 48?-253? ~~ RQgl~O1~ f2E{~I0P1AL AIRPg7i The Roanoke Regional Airport Commission is currently considering a new noise study. Two (2) noise studies have been completed since the completion of the runway extension project. These studies have been conducted in accordance with Special Condition No. 16 of the ADAP 6-51-0045-13 grant, executed Sept=owed Se~tembera21,S1981on 5.5 of the EIS for the runway extension, a p P In short, the City (now Commissurchasesallosangleafamily structures every five years and must offer to p and vacant land within the 40 NEF and offer to soundproof single structures between the 40 NEF and 35 NEF contour and all multi-family structures within the 40 NEF. These would be subject to the availability of State and Federal grant funds. The study being considered is to satisfy the requirements in the ADAP 13 Grant Agreements and the approved EIS. We have received verbal information which suggests that the FAA x.11 only participate in a full FAR Part 150 Noise Study for Roanoke. In order for the Commission to make an informal decision on this matter, we request your written response to the following questions: 1. Is the Noise Mitigation Program outlined in tWeli98heEFAAa legal requirement on both the Cit and FAA. continue to provide grant funds to support the prggram outlined in the EIS regardless of whether or not the Commission prepares a Part 150 Study? 2. Will the FAA participate in another Noise Study similar in scope to the latest noise contour update which was accomplished under the runway extension project? 3. Will FAA participate in preparation of Noise Exposure Maps (NEM) at this time with subsequent funding of a Noise Compatibility Program (NCP)? December lg. 1988 Page 2 ' 41iII FAA. in fact. only participate in a full FEtR Part I5Q 4. ~Iciise Study? Part ISO noise Study. regiment be 5_ If the Commission undertakes the F will the Special Condition i~ht~o~Assion to also continue satisfied without requiring with the ADAP 13 (and EIS) conditions. rovide clarification of the approval processfsequeace 6_ Please p for a Yart I5O Study. ate in a LSO Study? 7_ t~ihat role and which FAA office(s) particip cific ~aitigation measures ~shich must be g, Does FAA mandate spe ~sili be app=Dyed? included before a 150 Study I ~ponse to these The Airport Commission appreciates your time Y questions and issues. ectfully, Resp . 1~-- Kit B. Kiser Comanissioner KBK:afm ort Commission Chairman and Members, Roanoke Regional Airp cc: Airport Manager Airport Engineer ~r U S peportmen- otTronsporra~on Federal Aviation Administ-ation December 27, 1988 t•Sr. i:it B. Kiser. Director Utilities ~ Operations City of Roanoke 215 Church Avenue , S .Gi . Roanoke, Virginia 24011 Dear Mr. 1{iser: Kashington Airports t~isurict Office 900 S. 4iashingtoA_ Street, Rooms 200 Fails Church, lirginia 2204b (703) 285-2570 ._`. ~.. This is in response to your letter of December 19, 1988, requestiag clarification on the eligibility of noise projects for the Roanoke Regional Airport, Roanoke, Virginia. The mitigating measures of the Finding of Igo Significant Impact (FONSI), specifically, paragraph 3 state: • In accordance with their stated Policy (EA Page 5-5), the City will offer to purchase all single family structures and all vacant land currently within the NEF 40 area surrounding the airport. and will a I this Poiic to the NEF 40 areas defined as a result of future noise studies. The application of the City Policy is subject to the availabiiit~ of State and Federal grant funds. (emphasis added) The mitigating measures of the FONSI (including the above) mere includes ~s special conditions to be met under the ADAP-13, AIP-01, and AIP-02 grant a~;r•eements . F.ebarding the questions posed in your letter we offer the following: 1. Is the iloise Mitigation Pro6rar~ outlined in the 1981 ET_S a le3ai requirement on both the City and FAA? Wiii the FAA continue to provide Grant funds to support the program...whether or not t<<e Cor,~ fission prepares a Part 150 Study? The noise mitigation program is a conditioned requirement on the City (Commission). There is no obiiaation for FAA fund~~ng. The rAA will continue to p~•ovide Grant funds, if available, regardless of ttre preparation of a Part 150 Study. 2. Kili the FAA participate in another noise study similar in scope to the latest noise contour update which was accomplished under the runway extension project? Yes 3. Kill FAR participate fA pregaratton of Noise Ezposarc Maps (NEM) at this time with suhsequeat Loading of a Noise Compatibility Program (NCP)? u. Will FAA , in fact , only participate in a full FAR Part t50 ffiaf.se Study? A modified Part 150 study to develop only the NEM is eii_gible_. 5. If the Commission undertakes the FAR Part 150 Noise Study, trill the Special Condition in the AD AP 13 grant agreement be satisfied without requiring the Commission to also continue with the ADAP 13 (and EIS) conditions. Implementation of an accepted Part 150 Study xould constitute compliance with the mitigation measures of the FONSI. In response to your questions 6, 7, and 8, please refer~to the enclosed Part 150, pages 6 and 7 regarding determinations and evaluation. The Washington ADO will work with you in scoping the project and issuing a grant agreement. The Regional office will be responsible for processing the final Part 150 Study. Please let me know if you desire further clarification. Sincerely, ., William A. Whittle, Manager Washington Airports District Office Enclosure cc: VA/DA Delta Associates Mr. Frank Squeglia, AEA-610 E-{ARRIS MILLER MILLER & HANSON [NG 429 Marrett Road Lexington. Mass. 02173 (617) 863-1401 piJAL.tFTCATiONS AND EXPERIENCE RELATED TO FAp pART t50 l1ptSE COMPAT1t3lUTY PLANNING Harris Miner MNier & Hanson Inc.- HMMH. ~~ exc;eptional guaiffications related to F/iR Paid 150 Noise Compati~1zY Planning Studies- These qualtRcatior~ comer five key areas: - direct experience with Part 150 and related.progra~• - demonstrated ab~ity to develop effective and practical airport noise carmd measures, ``~ - record d conducting successful public partk:ipatkxt programs. - staff with comprehensNe skills and experience in all relevant technical areas, and - comprehensNe in-house techniicai equipment. The.fdlawing paragraphs summarize the relevance d each d these items. _ Direct experience with Part 150 and related programs Part 150 is a complex Program with extensive technical and procedural req tib'~' enissues in se with the sensitivity d airport noise/sand use comps ~Y requkements. c;orrtbined erg for controversy. general. result in a high pot HMMH staff have managed orb ~ ~~ i ~ ~ a~ guarantee tF a~he Partt150 program offer this level d experience Pe wt~l be developed and implemented with a minimum d controversy. We are prime consuttartt for Part 150 studies In Boston (MA), Nantucket (MA), Baltimore (MD), Bridgeport (C'T), Danbury (CT). Groton (CT). Portland (ME), and Derner (CO) (two Hartford (CT), projects). Our staffs Part 150 experience also includes major techn'~San An~onioilit(~), a project management in Atlanta (GA), Charlotte (NC), Burlington (VT), Midland-Odessa Cf~• Salt Lake City (ll'T)' Fort ~~e~~e (~)' '~ckson (MS), Providence (RI), Macon (GA), Oshkosh-Wittman Fie ~~iiea~j amps (FL). We have been selected to conduct the noise elements d a Part 150 ( in Denver is worthy d special note. The City d Denver has selected HMMH to Our irndvemertt conduct two Part 150 studies: one for the existing Derner -Stapleton Airport. H~ member of a replacement for Stapleton that the City plans to open in the year 2000• team d seven consulting firms that the City has hired to design this totally new air carrier airport. The Part 150 submission will be one of the major elements d the overall design. 8/f~ F1ARR-S M-t.tFR M-~~ & Haj~-so-~ -[~IC. Page 2 Part 150 OualMgtions vrdh the procedural regs~kements d Part 150. acts represent a range d experie~ n was ~ prepare an appl~^ FThpesee~~, pre of HMMH's early resP~ ratk~n. based on the sirpa'rs extensive for a temporary eorerr-Ptbn from full Part t50 preps vas ttx~ fkst foil Part 150 abatement prog the Pravid~ce study existing noise ~' By ppronred by the FAA 1n Ste. ar~1 its recprnmend~ undertaken at an air carrier airport. It was a measures are naw being &nplemented. ant tv tf're Navys mdse/land Related HMMH experience also inductee serving dbl~ ~ ~~~ studies, the mdltarY use compatibility Program -Air lrrstaNatlon Co~ nder a mold-Year contract to update eQuNalent of FAR Part 150. The firtm aurer~Y natbnwide. Under this red AiCU2 studies at Naval and Marine Corps a~ previously Preps at aver 50 air insiapatkxis. c~ract we have conducted noise surveys e'ot ,s HMMH staff also had a major rde in the development and Initial imps tewide airport noise cpnpatibility fegulatbn. The FAA based much of Part~150 on this sta regulation. _ Demonstrated ability to develop effective and practical airport noise control measures ant of noise contrd programs at many of the HMMH staff have had responsibUiry for developrn n MA Palm Beach s. including Boston-Logs ~ )~ natbn,s most highly noise-sensitNe airport intematkx~ai (FL), i~ailas-love Field ('fX). Chicago-O'Hare (li_). Denver-Stapleton (co . GA and others. Hartsfield-Atlanta ~ )• of ndse contrd programs such as these ~ This attention >Sta hallmark The key to the success o rational practicality. impiementatkx- requirements and to on9d ~ ode possible by the firm's extensive and direct of HMMH's approach to airport projects. ~ and designing noise contrd techniques, indudin9 experience M implemertting as well as analyz ng ail major opt'~~ preferential runway assignment programs, _ noise abatement flight tracks, _ noise barriers (inducting revenue-producing buildings). - noise abatement aircraft flight procedures, airport use restrictbns. _ noise budgets, - airport layout altematNes, - acquisition of land or interests therein, - residential and schod soundproofing programs, and _ permanent noise monitoring systems. a/sa RRtS Mtt_L_ER l~ll_L.ER & E{Q-NtSOR tNIG Ha P„Q. s Psrt t58 G1wn~tions ~ the fkrr+rs g Icrrptemer~^ ~tatbn issues b ~~'~~'~ and by HMMFft staff HMMH's ser>s~Y LO ~ aviation and air carrier airports• abatement offices- and reNiew fesP~~ ~~ and technical P~~ ~ ak~~ pa balanced by a~~~ eXp~~nce ~ that HMMtt nose CO^t~ This exper~e nY and pdentiai effects on airport oPe'a'dO^s' of their pract~l ~ re-ated federal tamplarity with airport noise compatff~aY ~~~Mr_ Rndr'e+'+ ~~ and HMMH' meted by the fad of the firrrr s P FAA ed ra of seminars on these top ofs ~ ~.s ~ ~r~itiner~tal for wog Myer. developed a series nts in ea Mr. Hobert ~, and core a the serrdrrar ~erNals them to FAA staff. airport ~ etretained~ HMMH on ~ Go~r°l P~n~ regions. The FAA subsea tided A G pubilcat{on as an FAA n3po~ nc participatiort~progrs~ pecord of conducting successful P~ that ensures public acceptance of the' ~ developed in a vraY acceptance of ap selected' Part t50 programs must use measures: unlversal ocedural steps in erecting noise contrd and ~~ blic accepts the technical and pr fdlowed to ~ achie~+ed, but ff the Pu with a minimum of controversy. actk~s Is unlikely im emented undertaken. the results can be defended and • Pl ~ avoided by conducting an lance of the study process can odanning study, 'Public' refers Problems related tO pubik: acceP ram. In an airport Pi interests, such as rtlcipa ory Pu ement Pra3 open and pa t blk: i ~~ also to other airport s ns public communities. but HMMH develOP nor only to the~mue~~, aim tenants, airlines, pilots and of ~ opporturiitY to express its the business ram to ensure that each of these interests ~rnanner. invoNemerrt Pra3 ~ a balanced and non-confrontational views and ~~ ~ ~~ ubiic involvement toils. inducting: in the use of a wide range of P We are eocpe-ier'cect ~~y ~,mittee processes, Technical WorMn9 Groups. ~ meeff~ or workshops, and public project ngwSletterS anq sump ~ ~~ , .,. _ - i~~ement In highly controversial credentials include successful Boston, HMMH's publb Irn+olv)uues in a very dNerse range ~ commun eland pailasAtlanta. airport ~ Provident . Charlotte. the Chk~9o suburbs, Dern+er, Palm Beach. to successfutlY balance community e d the firm's abdRY ehenslve noise contrd and land One project ~°"~~ an excelo nett involved developing a comer ro ect and avfatkm interests. The ~ j eton IntemationaL HMMH's dientsoo`ietor (the City tibAity program for Denver-Sn the airport, as Weil as the airport p P use comb mlttee made up of public inducted the sbc communities surrou tided by an Executive Com of Deaver). Project direction was P officials from each Jurisdiction. 8/88 HARRIS MILLER MILLER & HANSON iNC. Part t50 Oualif1catlons Page 4 Stan with oompnhenslw skills and experience in sit relevant techaicst areas The development of a Part 150 noise c~mmpatibiilty program requires the applk:atiort of a broad. range of prdessior-at skills and knowledge Major areas of relevance kx~ude: - computer modeling. - acoustics. - aircraft operatkx~. - airport operations and planning, and - land use planning. HMMH offers exceptional coverage in each of these areas. including staff wah the fidtowfng backgrounds: acoustical engineering, jet and propeller pilots, airport planning. computer operations engineering, and land use planning. This comprehensNe mbc of staff capa~itifes. ensures that aq aspects of Part 150 program development are treated thoroughly and efficientty_ Our technical qualificatkxis are reflected by three projects that the FAA has recently retained us to undertake: (t) a detaged comparison of the two computer noise models that the FAA currently approves for use in Part 150 studies, i.e. NOISEMAP and the Integrated Noise Model (INM); (2) development of mkrocomputer compatibility planning model for use by state and local agencies, and consultants in conductirx,~ heliport site selection studies ('HEUPLAN~; and (3) development of a microcomputer model for conducting sensitivity analyses of the effects of specific operational changes at an airport, without undertaking a full INM run ('NOSAM~. - Comprehensive in-house technical equipment The performance of a Part 150 study requires the use of a number of technical tools, including computers, computertzed models, and noise measurement equipment. HMMH has comprehensive in-house avaiiab~ity of this equipment, including: - 30 computers with proprietary analytical programs developed for specialized airport noise, land use and aircraft operational analysis; - approved operatkxtial versbns of the noise exposure models the FAA has authorized for use in Part 150 studies, I.e. the Integrated Noise Model (INM) and NOISEMAP; - portable and laboratory equipment for measuring and evaluating noise and vibration compliant with Part 150 requirements; and - word-processing and graphics software. HMMH specializes In the analysis of environmental noise; we offer technical capab~ities that translate Into credib~lty for our clients' projects. Firms that perform noise analyses as a sideline cannot offer the technical competence that is required for such public credibility. B/Ba pAR PART ISO STQDY ROANOKE REGIONAL AIRPORT ROANOKE, VIRGINIA PROGRAM OUTLINE WITH PROJECTED MEETINGS 1. Send out 1'st Informational Newsletter_ 2. Hold 1'st Public Meeting to describe Part l50 study program and to solicit gor public participants_ 3• Form Roanoke Regional Airport Noise Advisory Committee (ROA-NAC). 4. Meet with ROA-NAC (#1). 5• Initiate inventory and data collection process relative to the airport environs. 6- Measure aircraft noise in airport neighborhoods. ~• Develop existing operations and fleet mix. 8.• Meet with ROA-NAC (~2). 9. Develop draft noise exposure contours for existing conditions. 10. Develop future operations and fleet mix. 11. prepare Working Paper ~1 (if required) to document inventory and data collection up to this point in the study. 12. Meet with ROA-NAC (~3). 13. Finalize existing noise exposure contours. 14. Develop draft noise exposure contours for future conditions. 15. Determine existing and future incompatible land uses. 16. Document all noise and land use data in Volume 1: Noise Exposure Maps. 17. Develop preliminary list of noise and land use abatement alternatives. 18. Meet with ROA-NAC (#4). 19• Finalize future noise exposure contours. PROGRAM OUTLINE WITH PROJECTED MEETINGS (cont'd) 20_. Meet with FAA to discuss airspace and airspace constraints_ 2I_ Send out 2'nd Infonaational Newsletter_ 22. Hold 2'nd Public Meetiitq to describe noise exposure contours and preliminary abatement alternatives_ 23. Conduct preliminary analysis of noise aa~d land use abatement alternatives. 24. Prepare Working Paper #2 (ff required) to document preliminary analysis of abatement alternatives_ 25. Meet with ROA-NAC (#5). 26. Conduct further analysis of abatement alternatives_ 27. Meet with ROA-NAC (#6). 28. Prepare recommendations for noise and land use compatibility. 29. Meet with Roanoke Airport Commission (if required). 30. Meet with ROA-NAC (~7). 31. Prepare detailed action plan. 32. Prepare monitoring, enforcement, and evaluation procedures. 33. Outline procedures for future updates. 34. Document all noise and land use compatibility data in Volume 2: Noise Compatibility Program. 35. Meet with ROA-NAC (#8). 36. Prepare formal FAR Part 150 submittal to FAA and VDA. 37. Send out 3'rd Informational Newsletter. 38. Hold 3'rd Public Meeting to present full Part 150 program results. 39. Meet with ROA-NAC (#9). PAR PART 2S0 STUDY ROANORE REGIONAL AIRPORT ROANOKE. VIRGINIA ROANOKE NOISE ADVISORY COMMITTEE (ROA~TACj SUGGESTED MA~p 1' Airport Commission Member 2• Airport Manager 3• City Engineers Office 4• FAA Control Tower Representative 5• FAA Airports District Office Representative 5• VA Department of Aviation Representative 7• ROA - Airport Representative 8. ROA - Commuter Airline Representative 9• Roanoke Planning District Representative lo. Roanoke City Planner 11. Roanoke County planner 12. ROA - Air Freight Representative 13. ROA - Fixed Base Operator (Full Service) 14. ROA - Corporate User 15. 16. 17. Neighborhood Appointed Representatives " 18. r ~~ - RESOLUTION OF TKE ROANOKE REGIONAL AIRPORT COMMZSSION Adopted this 25th day of March, 1989. l~io_ 89-006 ~_ A RESOLUTION authorizing the filing and eaecutioa of certain Part 150 Noise Study grant documents on behalf of the Commission with the Federal Aviation Administration and the Virginia Department of Aviation, upon certain terms and conditions_ BE IT RESOLVED by the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission that the Commission Chairman and Secretary are authorized to exe- cute and attest, respectively, on behalf of the Commission in form approved by General Counsel, certain offers, and any amendments or other a grant applications, documentation with the Federal AviationrAdministrat~onaandng Virginia Department of Aviation for a Part 150 Noise Study, sub- ject to the approval of this project by the Roanoke City Council and the Roanoke County Board of .Supervisors, as more set forth in the report of the Airport Manager to thisaCommission dated March 15, 1989. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Commission Chairman is authorized to forward a copy of the a subject to the Roanoke City Council and rthe1RoanokeoCountytBoard of Supervisors and by letter of transmittal request approval of their governc~ents in accordance with the terms and conditions of the contract between the Commission and the participating politi- cal jurisdictions dated January 28, 198?, ATTEST: ~~ ~ J ,-, ~~ ' `' ~ r - ,. Sec'~etary F ~,I~ A i 1~ gg ~ESOUrcE~NM`~~ ,~ s~...~Fre~lr-~~c ~IIUnf1.J IIf ~IIFInA~2P BOARD OF SUPERVISORS COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR E~MER C HOOGE TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: M E M O R A N D U M lEE GARRETT. OrAIitMAN wnObOO ~.LS ~uG6TEilri O4TRKT R~CrIARp W. R08ER5. VICE-~'juuR1.1~W vrE ssw.+c ...casTEww. oesTwc~ 609 L JOHNSON ~QLM -uC•6TERrl 06TfiCT STEVEN I~ MCGRAW UT•w8• r•G6TE~rl p6TwK7 HARRr G. N~ptENS v+rTOH ~nGSTEsp,-~ 06TRtT Elmer Hodge / ` 1 Harry C. Nickens ~~ May 8, 1989 (/ STREET LIGHT UPDATE At some point, we need to have the County Board updated as to where we are in the plan for upgrading the street lights throughout the county. Particularly, if you would, check and see where we are in the upgrading of the street light at the intersection of Cameron and Dawnridge in Lindenwood Subdivision. Thank you. 8CN/bjh PO BOX 29600 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 240180796 (7031 772.2004 r. TS EpR P~T,IC ~ Hearing ° en u on creating a ~ . KEQU'ES t for Publ C1tiZen comet 1 ~ Reyes . elic r Y P , ~viCe autho t Se gCN / S~ ~~ITIG