Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout8/22/1989 - Regular~ o~ POANprF ti •w p a ~~~~~ ~~ ~~~~u~~ ,~ '~ 18 .~.a 88 SFSQUICEN7ENN~P~ A Btauli~ulBt~innin~ ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ACTION AGENDA AUGUST 22, 1989 Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meeting. Regular meetings are held on the second Tuesday and the fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public hearings are held at 7:00 p.m on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.) ._ 1. Roll Call. HCN ARRIVED 3:10 P.M. 2. Invocation: The Reverend Jeffrey Butcher Bonsack United Methodist Church 3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag. B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD T0, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS NONE C. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS, AND AWARDS 1. Recognition of All America City Festivities. PRESENTED BY ANNE MARIE FEDDER, MARY ALLEN D. NEW BUSINESS 1. Request for Resolution of Support for the Western Regional Forensic Science Laboratory. R-82289-1 HCN/RR TO APPROVE RESO BLJ DIRECTED THAT RESO BE SENT TO ROANOKE CITY AND SALEM ASKING FOR RESO OF SUPPORT FOR PROJECT 2. Request to establish a Community Service Program A-82289-2 HCN/LG TO APPROVE STAFF RECOMMENDATION AMENDED TO FOCUS ONLY ON COURT REFERRED PARTICIPANTS AS OPPOSED TO COORDINATION OF INTERN PROGRAM AYES-RR,SAM,HCN,LG NAYS-BLJ 3. Resolution authorizing the Regional Cable Television Committee to conduct community meetings for public comments on the franchise renewal R-82289-3 HCN/SAM TO ADOPT RESO URC 4. Authorization to execute a contract for residential care facilities - Youth Haven II. A-82289-4 HCN/BLJ TO APPROVE URC 5. Request to accept and appropriate two grants on behalf of the Department of Social Services. A-82289-5 SAM/LG TO APPROPRIATE GRANTS URC 6. Request to appropriate additional grant revenues to the Roanoke County School System. A-82289-6 BLJ/RR TO APPROPRIATE GRANTS URC E. REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS NONE ' F. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS NONE G. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS 2 JOHNSON: MOTION SECONDED BY MCGRAW THAT STAFF BRING BACK TO SEPTEMBER 12 MEETING A REPORT TO BEGIN A STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM, IDENTIFYING PROBLEMS, AND BEGIN AN ENGINEERING STUDY URC ROBERB~ (1) PRESENTED ^SMART FOOD^ TO BOARD MEMBERS AND REPORTED ON MEETINGS WITH VPI AND OTHERS CONCERNING THE SMART HIGHWAY BETWEEN BLACKSBURG AND ROANOKE VALLEY. (2) HAS RECEIVED RESPONSE FROM VEC AND ROANOKE COUNTY LIBRARY ON HIS SUGGESTIONS FOR USING AUTOMATED LIBRARY SYSTEM. MCGRAW: REPORTED ON VACO MEETING AND GRAYSON COMMISSION. ANNOUNCED PUBLIC HEARING DATES FOR GRAYSON COMMISSION HEARINGS WITH ROANOKE PUBLIC HEARING ON SEPTEMBER 25. H. APPOINTMENTS NONE 1. Community Corrections Resources Board 2. Fifth Planning District Commission 3. Grievance Panel 4. Industrial Development Authority 5. Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission 6. Court Service Unit Advisory Council/Youth and Family Services Advisory Board. I. CONSENT AGENDA R-82289-7 BLJ/HCN WITH ITEM 1 REMOVED FOR SEPARATE VOTE URC ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY. 1. Approval of Raffle Permit - Moose Lodge #284. A-82289-8 BLJ/HCN 3 AYES-BLJ, RR, HCN, LG ABSTAIN-SAM 2. Approval of Raffle Permit - Northside Athletic Booster Club A-82289-7 a 3. Approval of a Raffle Permit and One Bingo Game - Penn Forest Elementary School PTA. A82289-7.b J. FIRST READING OF REZONING ORDINANCES - CONSENT AGENDA BLJ/RR TO SET PUBLIC HEARINGS FOR 9/26/89 AYES : BLJ, RR, HCN, LG ABSTAIN-SAM 1. Ordinance to change the zoning classification of a .409 acre tract of real estate located at 5449 Franklin Road (Tax Map No. 98.02-2-9) in the Cave Spring Magisterial District from the zoning classification of B-2 to B-3 with conditions and a special exception upon the application of E_aale Ecruipment Companv 2. Ordinance to change the zoning classification of a .493 acre tract of real estate located northwest of the intersection of Peters Creek Road and Valleypointe Parkway in the Hollins Magisterial District from the zoning classification of A-1 to the zoning classification of M-1 with conditions and a special exception upon the application of Lincrerfelt Development Corporation K. CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS NONE L. REPORTS BLJ/LG TO RECEIVE AND FILE URC 1. Accounts Paid - July 1989 2. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance 4 3. General Fund Unappropriated Balance 4. Board Contingency Fund M. EXECUTIVE SESSION pursuant to the Code of Virginia Section 2.1-344 A requested by Roanoke County staff (a) to discuss legal matter, (b) to discuss probable litigation, (c) to discuss actual litigation, (d) to discuss acquisition of real property, (e) to discuss disposition of publicly held real estate, (f) to discuss performance of County Administrator, County Attorney LG/HCN AT 4:30 P.M. URC N. CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE SESSION R-82289-9 RR/BLJ AT 5:45 PM URC HCN/SAM TO ADD ITEM DEALING WITH SPECIAL ELECTION ON THE QUESTION OF A POLICE DEPARTMENT - URC REQUEST FOR ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION REQUESTING THE CIRCUIT COURT TO ORDER AN ELECTION ON THE QUESTION OF ESTABLISHING A POLICE FORCE IN ROANOKE COUNTY. HCN/BLJ TO ADOPT RESO URC DINNER RECESS - 5:55 P.M. EVENING SESSION (7.00 P M ) 0. PUBLIC HEARINGS 889-1 Petition of Trinity Church to rezone a 5.43 acre tract from M-2 Industrial to B-1, Business to construct a church, located along the east side of Route 220 at its intersection with Route 958 in the Cave Spring Magisterial District. HCN/RR TO APPROVE WITH CONDITIONS URC 5 889-2 Petition of LOBO Investors to rezone a 6.14 acre tract from R-5, Residential to R-l, Residential to construct single family homes, located along the south side of Buck Mountain Road, 200 feet east from its intersection with Branderwood Drive in the Cave Spring Magisterial District. 2 CITIZENS SPOKE IN OPPOSITION RR/LG TO CONTINUE FOR 30 DAYS FOR DRAINAGE STUDY AYES-RR NAYS-BLJ,SAM,HCN,LG BLJ/HCN TO APPROVE WITH CONDITIONS URC 889-3 Petition of HDC, Inc. to rezone a 19.30 acre tract from R-6, Residential to R-3, Residential to construct single family homes, located along the south side of Adamson Road, 300 feet from its intersection with Garst Mill Road iz~ the Windsor Hills Magisterial District. LG/SAM TO APPROVE WITH CONDITIONS AYES-RR,SAM,HCN,LG ABSTAIN: BLJ-ABSENT FROM DISCUSSION BECAUSE OF FINANCIAL INTEREST 889-4 Petition of Patsv and Clyde Collie for a Use Not Provided for Permit to operate a bed and breakfast in conjunction with a residence on a 5 acre tract located at 4225 Harborwood Road in the Catawba Magisterial District. SAM/BLJ TO APPROVE WITH CONDITIONS URC 889-5 Petition of The Roanoke County Plannina Commission to amend the Future Land Use Plan map designation of approximately 10 acres from Rural Preserve to Principal Industrial, located at the northeast corner of the Intersection of 16th Street and Carlisle Avenue in the Vinton Magisterial District. BLJ/SAM TOP APPROVE AYES-BLJ, RR, SAM, LG NAYS-HCN P. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 6 1. Ordinance amending Article III, Sewer Use Standards of Chapter 16 of the Roanoke County Code. LG/HCN TO APPROVE 1ST READING URC 2ND-9/12/89 2. Ordinance authorizing the sale of .47 ± acres in Southwest Industrial Park. BLJ/HCN TO APPROVE 1ST READING URC 2ND-9/12/89 3. Ordinance authorizing the sale of 5.039± acres in the Southwest Industrial Park. HCN/LG TO APPROVE 1ST READING 2ND - 9/12/89 Q. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance authorizing conveyance of rights of way in Hollins Community Development Project for acceptance into the State Secondary System. 0-82289-11 BLJ/HCN TO ADOPT ORD URC 2. Ordinance authorizing the dedication of County well lots for benefit of the Department of Health. 0-82289-12 HCN/RR TO ADOPT ORD URC R. CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS NONE BLJ/SAM ADDED ITEM TO APPROPRIATE $9,000 FROM BOARD CONTINGENCY FUND FOR INFORMATIONAL BROCHURE FOR POLICE DEPARTMENT REFERENDUM PMM REQUESTED PUBLIC HEARING ON 9/12/89 FOR VPSA PUBLIC SCHOOL BONDS 7 UNANIMOUS VOICE VOTE TO GO FORWARD LG/HCN TO GO INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION PURSUANT TO 3.1-344 (A) - TO DISCUSS PERFORMANCE OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR AND COUNTY ATTORNEY URC AT 8:55 PM - URC CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE SESSION R-82289-12 BLJ/HCN - URC AT 10:07 P.M. S. ADJOURNMENT AT 10:10 PM 8 i of aoaao~.F ti ~~ A ~ _~ Ir a ~~r~~~ ~~ ~~~ ~~~~ 1e ~~ 88 SFSQUICENTENN~P~ A Bcautiful Beginning ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA AUGUST 22, 1989 Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meeting. Regular meetings are held on the second Tuesday and the fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public hearings are held at 7:00 p.m on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.) 1. Roll Call. 2. Invocation: The Reverend Jeffrey Butcher Bonsack United Methodist Church 3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag. B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS C. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS, AND AWARDS 1. Recognition of All America City Festivities. D. NEW BUSINESS 1. Request for Resolution of Support for the Western Regional Forensic Science Laboratory. 2. Request to establish a Community Service Program 3. Resolution authorizing the Regional Cable Television Committee to conduct community meetings for public comments on the franchise renewal 4. Authorization to execute a contract for residential care facilities - Youth Haven II. 5. Request to accept and appropriate two grants on behalf of the Department of Social Services. 6. Request to appropriate additional grant revenues to the Roanoke County School System. E. REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS F. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS G. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS H • APPOINTMENTS 1. Community Corrections Resources Board 2. Fifth Planning District Commission 3. Grievance Panel 4. Industrial Development Authority 5. Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission 6. Court Service Unit Advisory Council/Youth and Family Services Advisory Board. I. CONSENT AGENDA ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER CONSIDERED THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE ENACTED BY BY THE BOARD TO ONE RESOLUTION BE ROUTINE AND WILL BE BELOW. IF IN THE FORM OR DISCUSSION IS DE$IR Ep THAT FORMS LISTED IT REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA . AND ~ EM WILL BE WILL BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY. 1. Approval of Raffle Permit - Moose Lodge #284. 2 2. Approval of Raffle Permit - Northside Athletic Booster Club 3. Approval of a Raffle Permit and One Bingo Game - Penn Forest Elementary School PTA. J. FIRST READING OF REZONING ORDINANCES - CONSENT AGENDA 1. Ordinance to change the zoning classification of a .409 acre tract of real estate located at 5449 Franklin Road (Tax Map No. 98.02-2-9) in the Cave Spring Magisterial District from the zoning classification of B-2 to B-3 with conditions and a special exception upon the application of Eagle Equipment Company 2. Ordinance to change the zoning classification of a .493 acre tract of real estate located northwest of the intersection of Peters Creek Road and Valleypointe Parkway in the Hollins Magisterial District from the zoning classification of A-1 to the zoning classification of M-1 with conditions and a special exception upon the application of Linaerfelt Development Corporation K. CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS L. REPORTS 1. Accounts Paid - July 1989 2. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance 3. General Fund Unappropriated Balance 4. Board Contingency Fund M. EXECUTIVE SESSION pursuant to the Code of Virginia Section 2.1-344 A requested by Roanoke County staff N. CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE SESSION EVENING SESSION (7.00 P M ) 3 0- PUBLIC HEARINGS 889-1 Petition of Trinity Church to rezone a 5.43 acre tract from M-2 Industrial to B-1, Business to construct a church, located along the east side of Route 220 at its intersection with Route 958 in the Cave Spring Magisterial District. 889-2 Petition of LOBO Investors to rezone a 6.14 acre tract from R-5, Residential to R-1, Residential to construct single family homes, located along the south side of Buck Mountain Road, 200 feet east from its intersection with Branderwood Drive in the Cave Spring Magisterial District. 889-3 Petition of HDC. Inc to rezone a 19.30 acre tract from R-6, Residential to R-3, Residential to construct single family homes, located along the south side of Adamson Road, 300 feet from its intersection with Garst Mill Road in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District. 889-4 Petition of Patsv and Clyde Collie for a Use Not Provided for Permit to operate a bed and breakfast in conjunction with a residence on a 5 acre tract located at 4225 Harborwood Road in the Catawba Magisterial District. 889-5 Petition of The Roanoke Count Plannin Commission to amend the Future Land Use Plan map designation of approximately 10 acres from Rural Preserve to Principal Industrial, located at the northeast corner of the Intersection of 16th Street and Carlisle Avenue in the Vinton Magisterial District. P. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance amending Article III, Sewer Use Standards of Chapter 16 of the Roanoke County Code. 2. Ordinance authorizing the sale of .47 + acres in Southwest Industrial Park. 3. Ordinance authorizing the sale of 5.039± acres in the Southwest Industrial Park. 4 4. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance authorizing conveyance of rights of way in Hollins Community Development Project for acceptance into the State Secondary System. 2. Ordinance authorizing the dedication of County well lots for benefit of the Department of Health. R. CITIZENS' CONIl~~NTS AND COMMUNICATIONS S. ADJOURNMENT 5 r ~-i AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 22, 1989 RESOLUTION 82289-1 OF SUPPORT FOR THE WESTERN REGIONAL FORENSIC SCIENCE LABORATORY WHEREAS, the proposed laboratory will assist law enforcement efforts in Southwest Virginia, with improved facilities and new equipment; and WHEREAS, the proposed Western Regional Forensic Science Laboratory will provide new employment opportunities for the residents of the Roanoke Valley; and WHEREAS, the Microbiology and Chemistry Laboratories will provide services not currently available in the Roanoke area. NOW, THEREFORE, the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors does hereby express its support to the Virginia Department of General Services, Division of Consolidated Laboratories in its efforts to build the new Regional Forensic Science Laboratory, and FURTHER, the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors does hereby encourage the General Assembly to fund the proposed facility in order to enhance the services provided to Southwest Virginia. On motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by Supervisor Robers, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisor Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Mary H.° Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Roanoke Valley Legislators Dr. A. W. Tiedemann, Director, Division of Consolidated Laboratory Services W. P. Laurie, Dewberry & Davis Paul Mahoney, County Attorney Skip Burkart, Commonwealth Attorney Michael Kavanaugh, Sheriff Thomas C. Fuqua, Chief, Fire & Rescue Dr. Margaret Hagan, Director, Health Department Clerk, Roanoke City Council Clerk, Vinton Town Council Clerk, Salem City Council Clerk, Botetourt Board of Supervisors ITEM NUMBER ~ "~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: August 22, 1989 AGENDA ITEM: Request for Resolution of Support for the Western Regional Forensic Science Laboratory COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: °~~ Q~-n .iL.iti~•W"'yy~Gi/Gt r~-$~/1~X ~4~1V BACKGROUND: The Board may recall that in 1987 the Virginia Department of General Services, Division of Consolidated Laboratory Services, made a request for land on which to build the Western Regional Forensic Science Laboratory. The State was specifically interested in the land behind the Public Safety Center and earlier this year, the Board formally donated that parcel to the Common- wealth. The location is particularly appropriate, as security for the building can be provided through the Sheriff's Office. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Division of Consolidated Laboratory Services will be placing the request for the new facility in the Governor's Budget this fall. The Regional Laboratory will contain the Medical Examiner's Office, and Forensic, Microbiology and Chemistry laboratories. The Medical Examiner's Office and Forensic Laboratory will replace the facilities located in the City of Roanoke near Community Hospital. The present offices and laboratory have outgrown their space as changes in technology and law enforcement have taken place and new equipment has been purchased. Both entities are used by law enforcement personnel from the entire southwest corner of the State and this will be the first multifunctional regional laboratory in Virginia. The Roanoke Valley does not currently have a Microbiology Laboratory, and the nearest facilities are in Abingdon and Luray. This will be the first State Chemistry Laboratory outside of Richmond and will serve all jurisdictions west of Appomattox. The proposed building is three stories, with a total interior space of 46,800 square feet. If it is approved in the 1990 General Assembly, construction will start shortly thereafter, with a target completion date of 1993. ~-/ With the increase in drug-related crimes in Western Virginia, there is a growing need for the type of evidence which is processed by the State Forensic Laboratory. At the present time, the law enforcement officials who work with that type of evidence must transport it downtown for processing, and often return there for consultation with the laboratory personnel. The location of the new facility will be very advantageous to Roanoke County, as our deputies will have no travel time involved in visiting the lab. The location is also convenient for the other law enforcement officials in the Western region, as it is adjacent to Interstates 81 and 581. The cost of construction of the new building is not yet finalized. It is anticipated that the new offices will provide ap- proximately 30 new jobs for the valley in the Microbiology and Chemistry Laboratories, with the possibility of expansion in the future in the Forensic Laboratory. Dr. A.W. Tiedemann has requested time on the August 22 agenda to make a presentation to the Board concerning the new facility and will be available to answer any questions which you may have concerning this project. He may ask for a small amount of additional land at this time to increase the parking area on the site. FISCAL IMPACT: None at the present time. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Supervisors pass the attached Resolution in support of the Western Regional Forensic Science Laboratory. ~~~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ------------------- ACTION -- Approved ( ) Motion by: VOTE Denied ( ) No Yes Abs Received ( ) Johnson Referred Robers To Garrett McGraw Nickens cc: File ~-/ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 22, 1989 RESOLUTION OF SUPPORT FOR THE WESTERN REGIONAL FORENSIC SCIENCE LABORATORY WHEREAS, the proposed laboratory will assist law enforcement efforts in Southwest Virginia, with improved facilities and new equipment; and WHEREAS, the proposed Western Regional Forensic Science Laboratory will provide new employment opportunities for the residents of the Roanoke Valley; and WHEREAS, the Microbiology and Chemistry Laboratories will provide services not currently available in the Roanoke area. NOW, THEREFORE, the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors does hereby express its support to the Virginia Department of General Services, Division of Consolidated Laboratories in its efforts to build the new Regional Forensic Science Laboratory, and FURTHER, the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors does hereby encourage the General Assembly to fund the proposed facility in order to enhance the services provided to Southwest Virginia. Dewberry & Davis .~ '~ DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES .- DIVISION OF CONSOLIDATED LABORATORY SERVICES COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA LABORATORY/ - MEDICAL EXAMINER FACILITY ROpNOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA ~. A PREPLANNING STUDY .~•. ~;.;.;, ~~~:~j~ ,,~,, Commonwealth of Virginia Department of General Services Division of Consolidated Laboratory Services Proposed New Western Regional Laboratory Backssround The Division of Consolidated Laboratory Services (DCLS) was established in 1972 by consolidating the laboratories of the Department of Health, Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, State Water Control Board, Air Pollution Control Board, and the Alcoholic Beverage Control Board. The legislation also mandated the establishment of Forensic Science services for all Law Enforcement agencies. The division was placed under the overall control of the Laboratory Services Operational Board. In 1978 as a result of the Hopkins Commission, the division became a part of the new Department of General Services. In 1972 the only existing service in Western Virginia was the Toxicology laboratory which until then was part of the Medical Examiner Office. DCLS rented space in the Carlton Terrace Building and renovated it for some laboratory operations. Since 1972, Drug Testing, Forensic Serology, Fingerprints, Trace Evidence, Firearm and Toolmark Examinations and Photography capabilities have been added. As workloads and capabilities grew, some additional space in the building was obtained and renovated. However, we have long recognized that modern laboratories should not be housed in buildings that were originally designed for offices or apartments. Laboratories need special exhaust systems, fume hoods, additional electrical requirements and more sinks, non-corrosive plumbing, and special temperature and humidity controls that are not found in typical office buildings. The Regional Medical Examiner's operation is also handicapped by space and schedule problems. Their offices are located in the Carlton Terrace Building, but autopsies are performed at the Community Hospital a few blocks away. Special arrangement must be made with the Hospital to reserve the room where autopsies are performed. When the County of Roanoke generously offered the Commonwealth land fora new Western Regional Laboratory, we realized that this was an opportunity to improve not only Forensic Science and Medical Examiner services, but to provide much needed Microbiological and Environmental services as well.l 1 A 1986 Health Lab Study recommended that "It would be advantageous to establish a regional laboratory in or close to Roanoke because it is centrally located in the region, is a major mail distribution center in the state, and had good transportation systems." It also stated that the City of Roanoke public health laboratory "...has been asked to do additional milk testing, which it declined due to inadequate time and personnel." Environmental requirements under the Safe Drinking Water Act and similar requirements mandated by the Virginia Water Control Board have grown significantly. Some of the Microbiological drinking water teats must be performed within 48 hours after the sample is taken. Because a high percentage of public water supplies are found in the Western and Southwestern parts of Virginia, better service could be provided if samples were sent to Roanoke rather than Richmond. We therefore proposed construction of a Western Regional Laboratory which could provide the Medical Examiner will a modern facility, provide better and expanded support for Law Enforcement, effect better health-related services and environmental services requiring Chemical analysis for Southwestern Virginia. A list of planned services is attached. In April 1989 our proposal was approved by the Virginia Department of Planning and Budget and a Preplanning Study was authorized. For this study we directed Dewberry and Davis to develop a basic plan for the following functions: 1. A modern, efficient facility for the Office of the Medical Examiner of the Department of Health. 2. A modern, state-of-the-art facility for Forensic Science. 3. State-of-the-art laboratories for Microbiological and Chemical Analysis for designated parameters. 4. Necessary support, security, and utility spaces. 5. An exterior appearance compatible with the area and attractive. We must emphasize that this is a Preplanning Study. The final report will be submitted to the Department of Planning and Budget on September 1, 1989. From there it must be reviewed and approved by Planning and Budget, the Bureau of Capital Outlay in the Division of Engineering and Buildings, and the Secretary of Administration. Their analysis and review will result in a recommendation to the Governor. The Governor will then decide whether or not to include this project in the appropriations recommended for FY 1990-92. If the Governor includes this project in his appropriations and if the General Assembly approves funding, we will be able to initiate Request for Proposals for the final design and construction specifications which will lead to a contract for construction of the laboratory. The Preplanning Design aspects for this project will be presented by the Project Architect, Willis P. Lawrie, AIA of Dewberry & Davis, Architects, Engineers, Planners, and Surveyors. Facility Description The proposed facility is a three-story building located on a 2.3 acre site within 0.1 miles of the intersection of I-581 and VA 117. The two adjacent buildings are the Roanoke County Communications Center and the Sheriff's Headquarters to the East and Northside High School to the West. A nearby church is separated from the site by a buffer of trees. The building will be a three-story building comprised of steel framed construction with a brick masonry exterior wall construction. There is one entrance drive along the West side of the site that provides entrance to the parking in front of the building and access to the receiving areas at the rear and East sides of the building. The rear receiving area is a loading dock for sample and stock deliveries, and the East receiving area is the Morgue Receiving for the Medical Examiner's facility. The building will be entered on the second level which contains the public spaces and the Bureaus of Microbiology and Chemistry. The loading dock and receiving for the building is also located on this floor. The third floor contains the Forensic Science Laboratory. The entire building except for the entrance lobby and public spaces have security controlled access. The building aesthetic is designed to illustrate the security and strength that a consolidated laboratory should have and at the same time have an entrance that is inviting. The building design is delineated in the following drawings: P-1: Perspective Rendering C-1: Site Plan A-1: 1st Floor Plan A-2: 2nd Floor Plan A-3: 3rd Floor Plan A-4: Elevations Microbiology Laboratory Tests Planned for the Western Regional Laboratory Water Bacteriology Including total coliform and fecal coliform by the muliple tube and membrance filter methods. (VDH Drinking Water and Water Control Board Support. Milk Bacteriology: Standard plate count, coliform plate count, phosphatase, antibiotics. Serology: Rapid Plasma Reagin (RPR) test and Microhemagglutination (MHA-TP) tests for Syphilis. Blood group, type, and atypical antibody screen. Chlamydia test. Hepatitis B antigen test. Bacteriology: Gonorrhea: Culture and identification, gonorrhea antibiotic sensitivity screen. Virology: Rabies: Examination of animal heads by Fluorescent antibody and animal inoculation. Support Units Will: Prepare media and reagents, run Quality Control tests, prepare mailing containers, and prepare and sterilize glassware. They will also decontaminate infectious material generated by this Regional Laboratory. Specimen/Sample receiving will be shared by Chemistry and Microbiology, as will clerical and filing support. Other possibilities by 1993-94: Lyme Disease Serology and HIV (AIDS) Serology Chemical Tests Planned for the Western Regional Laboratory 1. Metals 18 metals (e.g. Arsenic, Borium, Cadmium, Chromium, Iron, Lead, Mercury, Selenium, Copper, Nickel, Zinc.) 2. Nutrients Nitrates, Nitrites, and Phosphates 3. Organic Chemicals Endrin, Liindane, Methoxychlor, Toxaphene, 2,4,-D, 2,4,5-TP, Aldicarb, chlordane, Trihalomethanes (THM), Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC), Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB). 4. Others Biological Oxygen Demand, Total Organic Carbon, Chemical Oxygen Demand, Solids, Sulfates, Cyanide, Phenols, and Surfactants. LA Architects Engineer 5021 YULYVOInb V4rkr4y 2701 Em.r7wooA Pnkw Ro4noN, Ylrflnin 2401! RlekmonC, YIr.Ini• 2221 700-0f2-7726 _ 804-672-0462 PREPLANNING ~.. ~ ~ 4 :~ i '! . t ~ ~ ` A,' ~r ^d r ~\ D 0 ~ ~ Y I~ 1Y I- -r.~.~.' H Ir e M .5 ~e~ Y N C Y O C U1 0 ~ A ~ ON Y7 r > • 1. . _ o m o^ loo ~v _o ~a~~m N T ~1 q C1 3 O r"Y o • a a N W C • « C 0 N 3 ~o~~ U _n m e ~ A „~~ i i ~ 1.>"~° N N O 17 N O O A ~`~ N 6 A /A ~- J JV U~ a~ w N W ~U Z_ ~ ~ N Q X .~ W C: J ~ Q W U Z D ~ W-LL ~ ~O~ ~ ~ ~~ Owl ~ ~ ~ H Y O Q ~ m d co aw o J ~ ~ Z Q J a w H Dr~~vn By ~~~ e, Mq 31 AUG. F°~ StW 1~=~~ I C-1 I exawcnrs sw. s stcawnma SIT ~ ~_ ~ ~0 LEVEL 1 0 8 ,s wosrsrn~s sswr. s arawwx~ms ~. ~ Q ~ H .'A n ~,, a e •_ ~ o _n A you 0 a;. > r M ~ ~ e ~• 6 c n fr' m E '" ~Opo ~a~am m ; a w+ ~ ~ o W ~~a ° O Y N 3 ~oa~ _~ ~:>~ w, M ~ ~ H W y7>:m A O Pl 0 Y w n e+ w o0 d~a~ > ~ F J J U - ~ U N LL U ~ ~ W ~ Z W ~ N Q J X W Q ~ W Q Z U ~ D ~ O > . F- .~ ~ Z Q W > ~ ~ Y ~ O ma c J ~ ~ Z Q J a ,~ ~ Z O a x J w LL J a~ U J N WU r fLL °~I AU489 I A-1 I TERRACE I ~. CLASSROOA INFECTIOUS WASTE I r i' I, SERVICE ENTRY 1 1 ~ ~\ ',I ~~ ~, it - PREPARA' I F5r ~ Fil ~~,~ ~ ESTICIDES, FH w i ~ ARCADE ~ ~ ~~ ~ 1? j n rNSTRUr~ n ~_-- LEVEL 2 0 8 76 nraa~mrs sw. a naxw~nme ~0 N 0 0 C CLUE RL~iou2ca% ;TO o X111 CC CLERICAL y BOTTLE STORAGE U ~ Z ~ . o.r ~;a a -~rM ~ °'. ~$~a fn°ov Z u~ ~~ a p ~ i e LL C ~ W ~ O1' N ~ ~ C E ~o°, Q~ a ~ We~.a Y"' O ~ M a = U ~ ~ Z ~ ~ ~ O .1 Y ~ ~ M~ O • N ~ 4Ii : N M • 3 C 0 T ~~° ~- ~~ V > Mii 7 Y V m C Ir n • no Qi n s N ~ J J V D a ~' w w ~ _U W ~ Z ~ - W ~ N X '~ w a J W Q Z U w D C7 W LL. R ~ O 'c ~ . I- 'vs p w '> Q ~ ai Y O m a era J ~ ~ Z Q y J o a a ~ o O a O J J N ~ U D w ~. ~ M ~ a«aQe~a B7ll t~~i..~ 31 s~Ul. 29~ S = I'-O'~ BEVEL 3 FLOC 0 8 s ~. ,oues5 mvaamrs suc a s~axwnmc I A-31 EU M i q ~ ~Y~ y N 1 . O C ~ T~ A y°° Y ~ ~ e W ~ O ~ u ~a~a ~ m: .v a ~- •~d ~ ~y r N W C C o_ 3 ~°° m ~, a > Y A 00 U e r ~ w o Q b 6 NORTH ELEVATI ~ J J U U N LL w W > ZW ~ N X J W ~ J W Q Z U w ~ ~ w LL c+a ~ O 'E ~ H 'vrn Ow> ~ ~ Y ~ O ma a aw o J O ~ N Z O H Q w J W sia~as~ I ~~II y'i_CN SOUTH ELEVATION 96 32 avaurmea suc ~ s~ax~ruxs I A-4 I ~ / ~ ~ ACTION NO. A-82289-2 ITEM NUMBER. ~ _ ~'' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPFRVISORG OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKF COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: August 22, 1989 AGENDA ITEM: Authorization to Establish a Community Service Program COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENT ~~~~ ~~ SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Department of Human Resources recently met with Mr. Jim Phipps, of the Community Diversion Incentive Program, Mr. Skip Burkart and officials of the Court, to discuss implementing a community service program for the County. This program will provide volunteer workers for the county from a group of offenders who are required to perform community service work in lieu of paying court fines and costs. This is a program which will benefit the county by providing a means to recover court fines and costs through work hours as opposed to losing unrecoverable court costs. This program has already been implemented in the City of Roanoke and in Alleghany County and Covington n ofdthis h r gramaiseatt ch d for your consaderationa descriptio p In order to implement the community service program, the nepartment of Human Resources recommends hiring a part-time Volunteer Coordinator to place offenders in appropriate county work sites. Other localities throughout the Commonwealth of Virginia have Volunteer Coordinators to administer and organize the volunteer effort for their locality. These localities are able to benefit from hundreds of volunteer hours through a coordinated effort. A Volunteer Coordinator for the county would develop and admin- ister the community service program. The Volunteer Coordinator would also be responsible for administering the Community Diversion Incentive Program and the Juveniles In Community Service Program through the courts, organizing a student internship program through local high schools and colleges, and expanding the County's involvement in other community based volunteer programs. ~- FTTNT)TNG Funding is requested in the amount of $5800.00 from the Fiscal Year 1989-90 Board of Supervisors Contingency Account. This amount will cover the cost of salary for a six month trial period for a part-time Volunteer Coordinator. As this is a part-time position, the incumbent would not be eligible for regular county benefits . RECOMMENDATION: The Department of Human Resources recommends participating in the community service program and authorizing funding for a part-time Volunteer Coordinator to administer the community service program and other volunteer programs. $5800.00 is requested from the Board of Supervisors Contingency Account to cover salary for a six month trial period. Should this program prove successful, the Department of Human Resources will report back to the Board of Supervisors following the six month trial period to request additional funding. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED: ~. D. Co Directo of Human Resources APPROVED BY: ~.~%rx~ Elmer C . Hod e County Administrator Attachment ---------------------------------------- ACTION Approved ( ~ Motion by: Harry C. Nickens/ Denied ( )Lee Garrett to approve staff Garrett Received ( )recommendation amended to Johnson Referred focus only on court referred McGraw To participants as opposed to Nickens coordination of intern Robers program cc: File D. Keith Cook, Director, Human Resources Reta Busher, Director, Management & Budget Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance VOTE No Yes Abs x _~ _~ -x- ~- ~-z U~LUNTEER FINE ~PIIDN WORK PROGRAM FAR THE COUNTY OF ROAN~KE In Conperatian With the General District Court Twenty-third Judicial District 1 .~ " Z INTRODUCTION During the past several years the problems experienced by Virginia's General District Courts in collecting court costs and fines have increased. The Roanoke County General District Court, as with most other Courts, has experienced similar problems. The available solutions, such as fail or debt-set-off, have not proven to be cost-beneficial. Although they may be appropriate in a few cases, by-and-large they offer few positive encouragements far the majority of individuals, particularly those that are unemployed. The availability of the "Volunteer Fine Option Program" to the Roanoke County General District Court will provide an opportunity far a cast-benefical approach to minimizing the incidence of uncollectable fines and costs. The purpose of this program is to allow non-violent offenders awing money to the Court to satisfy their debts through free community service labor for the County of Roanoke. AUTHOF,ITY The Cnde of Virginia [Section 19.2-95~t] authorizes the Court to establish a work program for the discharge of fines and CDSts. PROGRAM OBJECTIVE To provide the alternative of free community service labor in satisfaction of discharging Court fines and costs. 2 PROGRAMMATIC ISSUES Benefits to Courts: Benefits to County: Benefits to Public: Costs to Courts: ~-2 Indirect collection of fines and casts. Decreasing the incidence in the accumulation of bad debts. Readily available supply of Free labor. Availability aF labor to perform services not otherwise able to be completed with existing resources. Sense of satisfaction in knowing that individuals are being held responsible far their behavior. Providing contact person to forward and receive referrals. Costs to County: Accident Medical Insurance for all participants. The current annual premium for $20,000 of CexcessJ coverage is X2.00/person. Providing contact person to receive, supervise, and report performance to Court. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA The .Court would utilize the fallowing guidelines when referring participants for placement: 1. Non-violent offenses. 2. The participant must he able-bodied and mentally competent, minimum age of 18, willing and able to perform manual, unskilled and strenuous work. Participants exhibiting any physical disability or physical limitations far strenuous physical labor work would be excluded from placement in the program. 3. The participants would actually and affirmatively be volunteering for the program in lieu of paying their court costs and/or court Fines. 3 - .Z 't. Identified alcoholics, drug users and those of marginal mental competence would not be placed in the program. S. Males and females would be eligible. 6. Participants would agree, in writing, to obey all rules and regulations of the County. 7. No participant would be assigned to the program for less than Z'1 hours C3 work days] of work. All placements will be for full eight C8]-hour work-days. PRC]GRAM ADi1 I N i STRAI i ^N the Roanoke County General District Court will be primarily responsible for the administration of this program, in caoperatinn with the County of Roanoke. A. Volunteer Contract 1. The attached contract would be executed between the Court and the participant with a copy forwarded to the Cnunty. B. Credit for Fines/Casts C]wed 1. The Court will utilize the factorial of one C1] hour community service labor Far each $5.00 of obligated court cost/fine. C. Type of Work 1. Participants will be required to perform labor in- doors and out-af-doors. 2. The lobar may be manual and vigorous, requiring strrenuous efforts. 3. The hours of work may be during the day or in the evening, as deemed necessary by the County. ~./ ~}. Examples of work to be performed are a. Cleaning vehicles; b. Litter and Trash pick-up; c. Mowing; d. Janitorial services; e. Receptionists duties; and, f. General maintenance. D. Dress Code 1. Full shirt. 2. Full length pants. 3. Shoes with hard sole leather Cwith safety toes, if available]. E. Transpartntion 1. The participant is responsible far trnnsportatian to and from the worksite. F. Number of Participants 1. One C1] to fifteen C15] participants can be accepted in the program, at any one time. G. Reporting Worksites 1, The County will reserve the right t^ advise the Court of the location of the reporting sites. H. Supervision 1. Cln-the-dab supervision of the participants would be provided by the County. ,~-2 I. Code of Conduct 1. All participants would be expected to follow the County's rules and regulations including the Personnel operating Procedures. J. Termination from the Program 1. The County may terminate an individual's participation in the program For failure to comply with the County's rules and regulations ar for absenteeism and/or poor work performance. K. Injuries 1. Should an injury occur the County's procedures for handling an-the-fob injuries For the regular employees would be Followed. L. Pergarmance Evaluation 1. The County's supervisory representntive will be responsible for completing the perFormance evaluation provided onthe Court's reFerral farm. The Form will be completed whether the participant completes the prngrnm successfully or unsuccessfully. M. Record Keeping 1. The primary responsibility Fnr record keeping shall rest with the Court. The County will keep track of the work schedule of the participant and provide this information t^ the Court upon the participant's completion of the prngrnm. 6 N. Program Contact Persons 1. Roanoke Cnunty General District Court Mrs. ?heresn Childress Clerk Roanoke County General District Cnurt 2. County of Roanoke Mr. Elmer Hodge County Administrator Roanoke Cnunty 7 -~ ~3 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF'SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, AUGUST 22, 1989 RESOLUTION 82289-3 AUTHORIZING THE ROANOKE REGIONAL CABLE TELEVISION COMMITTEE TO CONDUCT PUBLIC HEARINGS BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that the Roanoke Regional Cable Television Committee is hereby authorized to conduct on behalf of the Board an appropriate public hearing or hearings with reasonable public notice in a place and manner deemed suitable for the purpose of soliciting public comment and information on the proposed renewal of the existing cable television franchise held by Cox Cable Roanoke Inc. On motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by Supervisor McGraw, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisor Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: /' ~- ~ Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Paul Mahoney, County Attorney Mark A. Williams, Assistant Roanoke City Attorney Frank Selbe, III, Vinton Town Attorney ACTION NO. -~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: August 22, 1989 AGENDA ITEM: Resolution authorizing the Roanoke Regional Cable Television Committee COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: It has been suggested that the City of Roanoke, the Town of Vinton, and the County of Roanoke formally authorize by resolution the Roanoke Regional Cable Television Committee to act on behalf of the City, Town, and County and conduct one or more separate meetings or hearings in each jurisdiction for the purpose of receiving public comments on the proposed renewal of the cable television franchise. Each jurisdiction will consider the adoption of an authorizing resolution. The Roanoke Regional Cable Television Committee will conduct these public hearings or meetings on behalf of each jurisdiction. This procedure will comply with the franchise renewal requirements under the Cable Committee Policy Act of 1984. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Board favorably consider the adoption of the attached resolution. Res ectfully submitted, Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney ITEM NO. Action Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by Garrett Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers Vote No Yes Abs AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, AUGUST 22, 1989 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE ROANOKE REGIONAL CABLE TELEVISION COMMITTEE TO CONDUCT PUBLIC HEARINGS BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that the Roanoke Regional Cable Television Committee is hereby authorized to conduct on behalf of the Board an appropriate public hearing or hearings with reasonable public notice in a place and manner deemed suitable for the purpose of soliciting public comment and information on the proposed renewal of the existing cable television franchise held by Cox Cable Roanoke Inc. ACTION NO. A-82289-4 ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: August 22, 1989 AGENDA ITEM: Authorization to Execute a Contract for Residential Care Facilities on Behalf of Youth Haven II COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~ ~,~~~ BACKGROUND• The County of Roanoke, City entered into a contract in January would jointly use Youth Haven I and secure residential care for youth this contract, the per diem rates these two facilities were based o~ from the previous fiscal year. of Roanoke and City of Salem 1987, whereby these localities Youth Haven II to provide non- of the Roanoke Valley. Under for the placement of youth at ~ the local operating expenses The County of Roanoke on behalf of Youth Haven II and City of Roanoke on behalf of Youth Haven I, recently received Title XX vendor status as established by the Commonwealth of Virginia's Department of Social Services Interdepartmental Committee on Rate Setting. The rate established by the committee for the 1989-90 fiscal year for Youth Haven I, is $28.44 and for Youth Haven II, $34.55. These rates are calculated after considering the operating expenses, depreciation, etc., less any grants and monies received from State or Federal agencies. By being designated as a Title XX vendor, youth who are wards of the Department of Social Services can be placed at the facility and reimbursed under Title XX monies allocated to the Social Services Department. The proposed contract amends the language concerning the establishment of the per diem rate to consider per diem rates which may be established by any Federal or State agency for the facility or program. ALTERNATIVES AND IMPACT: RECOMMENDATION• Staff recommends that the County Administrator be authorized to execute said contract on behalf of the County of Roanoke and that said contract will also be circulated to the City of Roanoke . T and City of Salem for participation in the Youth Haven I and Youth Haven II programs. Respectfully submitted, Approved ~- L~: by, r ~ ~ ~, ~ 3<. riwv ohn M. Chambli s, Jr. Elmer C. Hodge Assistant Administrator County Administrator ---------------- -- -------------------------------- ACTION ---------- VOTE Approved (x) Motion by: Harry C. Nickens/ No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Bob L. Johnson Garrett x Received ( ) Johnson x Referred ( ) McGraw x To ( ) Nickens x Robers x cc: File John Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator Bev Waldo, Director, Youth Haven ACTION N0. A-82289-5 ITEM NUMBER ~ - ~-- AT A REGUL IA HELDIAT OHE ROp,NOKERCOUNTY ADMINISTRATOIONROC NOTER COUNTY, VIRGIN MEETING DATE: August 22, 1989 AGENDA ITEM: Behalf of the Departmentp of Soc al Services s on COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR' S COMMENTS : ~~~''~~''~ BACKGROUND• The Department of Social Services for the County of Roanoke has applied for and been approved by the Commonwealth of Virginia for grants to help in the funding of public assistance programs. One grant in the amount of $6,953.75 has been approved by the Commonwealth of Virginia, Department of Social Services for a Community Based Foster Care Prevention Program. This program funds a Volunteer Parent Aid Program in which volunteers work with parents who have abused or neglected their children or are suspected of doing so, thus preventing the placement of these children into a normal foster care environment. The second grant has been received from the Commonwealth of Virginia, Department of Health and Human Services in the amount of $520 for an Independent Living Ini b tureen fostermcarelcand ethe teenaged children bridge the gap ability to live on their own. Each of these grants is 100 reimbursable and requires no new appropriation of County monies. ALTERNATIVES AND IMPACT: RECOMMENDATION• Staff recommends that the accepted by the County of Roanoke and expenditure) be approved to grant proceeds. two grants referenced above be and that appropriations (revenue authorize the spending of these Respectfully submitted, ~~ ~ ~~~ hn M. Chambli , Jr. Assistant Administrator Approved by,, / f ~~.~'~c's- °` Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator -- S ACTION Approved ( x) Motion by: StP~7Pn A M~r'raw/ Denied ( ) r PP C'arre+t Garrett Received ( ) Johnson Referred ( ) McGraw To ( ) Nickens Robers cc: File John Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator Betty Lucas, Director, Social Services Reta Busher, Director, Management & Budget Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance VOTE No Yes Abs x x X A-82289-6 ACTION NUMBER __ ITEM NUMBER ~ ~ '~` AT A R~ULAR H~ELDI A ~~ ~ AOR~D OCOUNTY ADMIN~ISTRAT OANNOKR COUNTY, VIRG MEETING DATE: August 22, 1989 AGENDA ITEM• Appropriation of Additional Grant Revenues to the Roanoke • County School System. ..~~:~z COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR' S CONIMFNTS : ~ LZ , , ~. , ~r..z. ~,, ~ ~' SUNY~IARY OF INFORMATION: The Roanoke County School System is requesting non additionalainforma- tions be made to their federal grant monies 's~ased upo tion they have received since the 1989-90 fiscal year began. These additional grant monies are as follows: 1, Drug-free Schools and Community Grant. This a federal g $35,000 the employment of a coordinator for the student assistance program; was orginally budgeted for 1989-90. The schools have been nortof~~ Lion tis total amount of the grant is $55,303. An additional app p requested of $20,303. 2. Vocational 2+2 Grant. Cooper Industries has donated $10,000 for the Vocational 2+2 Progr~fothehsecond $10,000gwi11 be included in the 1990e 91 grant of $10,000 pe y fiscal year budget. 3, Melding the Arts and the Vocations. A federal grant for a voca- tional program for gifted students interested in art in the amount of $5,000 has been received. An additional appropriation is needed at this time for Regional Principles Preparation Grant. 4, A State grant program sponsored by VPI & area. STAFF gEppNgv~pATIONS in the amount of $25,000 has been awarded for a SU for the training of school principals in the It is recommended that the above grants be appropriated to federal programs fund budget. Attached is a copy of the Resolution the School Board on August 10, 1989. the school adopted by Respectfully submitted, Approved by, Diane D. Hyatt Director Finance 1 Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ACTION VO`L'E Approved ( ~ Nbtion by: Bob L. Johnson/ No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Richard W. Robers Garrett x Received ( ) Johnson x Referred ( ) McGraw x ,~ Nickens x Robers x cc: File Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance Dr. Jerry Hardy, Director, Finance, County Schools Dr. Bayes Wilson, Superintendent, County Schools Ruth Wade, Clerk, Roanoke County School Board ~• FROM THE MINUTES OF THE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD OF ROANOKE COUNTY, ~ ..~ VIRGINIA, MEETING IN REGULAR SESSION ON AUGUST 10, 1989 AT 7 P.M. IN THE BOARD ROOM OF THE SCHOOL ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, SALEM, VIRGINIA. 4 RESOLUTION REQUESTING ADDITIONAL APPROPRIATIONS TO THE ROANOKE COUNTY SCHOOLS' BUDGET WHEREAS, additional grant funding has been received for the Roanoke County School System; BE IT RESOLVED that the County School Board of Roanoke County, on motion of Maurice L. Mitchell and duly seconded requests appropriations by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County for the following funds: 1. Drug Free Schools and Community Grant (federal) for the employment of a coordinator for the student assistance program. Amount budgeted 1989-90: $35,000; amount of grant: $55,303. Additional Appropriation Requested: $20,303.00 to the following budget codes: Revenue - 25-5-00000-330400 Expenditure - 25-6-1102R-1A3000 2. Vocational 2 + 2 Grant received from Cooper Industries. Additional Appropriation Requested for 1989-90: $10,000.00 to the following budget codes: Revenue - 25-5-00000-600000 Expenditure - 25-6-13135-3H5803 3. Melding the Arts and the Vocations: A Vocational Program for Gifted Students Interested in Art (federal grant). Appropriation Requested for 1989-90: $5,000.00 to the following budget codes: Revenue - 25-5-00000-600001 Expenditure - 25-6-1313V-403114 Consultants Expenditure - 25-6-1313V-406013 Instructional Materials & Supplies Expenditure - 25-6-1313V-405807 Other Instructional Expenses 4. Regional Principal's Preparation Grant (state) for a program sponsored by VPI & SU involving area school systems. Appropriation Requested for the period of 1989-91: $25,000.00 ~1 y to the following budget Revenue - Expenditure - Expenditure - Expenditure - codes: ~ - ~„/1 25-5-00000-600002 25-6-1319W-005501 Travel 25-6-1319W-006013 Materials & Supplies 25-6~1319W-003114 Consultants Approved by the following recorded vote: AYES: Paul G. Black, Maurice L. Mitchell, Charlsie S. Pafford, Frank E. Thomas NAYS: None ABSENT: Barbara B. Chewning TESTE: ~ tip. ~ Clerk c: Mrs. Diane Hyatt ~~ ACTION N0. ITEM NUMBER / ' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE:_ August 22, 1989 AGENDA ITEM: Appointments to the Court Service Unit Advisory Council/Youth and Family Services Advisory Board COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: On December 13, 1988, the Board of Supervisors voted to continue this Board and appoint new members. Michael Lazzuri, Director of Court Services has contacted the present members of the Court Service Unit Advisory Council/Youth and Family Services Advisory Board to determine whether they wished to continue serving. The following terms expired in 1988 or will expire in 1989. Appointments to this committee are not made by magisterial district; however, the magisterial district is listed for each member. Two-year term of James L. Trout, Vinton Magisterial District, will expire March 22, 1989. Mr. Trout has not responded to Mr. Lazzuri's letter. Two-year term of Ted R. Powell, Cave Spring Magisterial District, will expire March 22, 1989. Mr. Powell would like to be reappointed. Two-year term of Hoyt C. Rath, Vinton Magisterial District, will expire March 22, 1989. Mr. Rath does not wish to serve another term. Two-year term of Dr. Andrew Archer, Vinton Magisterial District expired March 22, 1988. Dr. Archer does not wish to be reappointed. In addition to the appointments listed above, it is necessary to appoint four youth members, one each from Cave Spring High School, Northside High School, Glenvar High School, William Byrd High School. Mr. Lazzuri recommends that these o Pntment emade rin from September through September. Therefore, app 1989 will expire September 1, 1989. Thereafter all expire September 1, coinciding with the school year. SUBMITTED BY: ~_~,~~ Mary H. Allen Clerk to the Board ~.._~ _. terms will APPROVED BY: j~/~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator --------------------- ------------------------ VOTE ACTION Yes No Abs Approved ( ) Motion by: Garrett Denied ( ) Johnson Received ( ) McGraw Referred Nickens To: Robers 2 ACTION NUMBER ITEM NUMBER ~ -~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: August 22, 1989 SUBJECT: Appointments to Committees, Commissions and Boards COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Community Corrections Resources Board One-year term of Edmund J. Kielty, Alternate. His term expired August 13, 1988. Fifth Planning District Commission Three-year term of John Hubbard, Citizen Representative and Executive Committee member expired June 30, 1989. Mr. Hubbard does not wish to serve another term. Grievance Panel Two-year term of Kim Owens will expire on September 27, 1989. Industrial Development Authority Four-year terms of Billy H. Branch, Cave Spring District, and W. Darnall Vinyard, Vinton District will expire on September 26, 1989. Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission Three-year term of Alice Gillespie, Hollins Magisterial District will expire June 30, 1989. SUBMITTED BY: m~~ ~ ~ Mary H. Allen Deputy Clerk -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: Yes No Abs Denied ( ) Garrett Received ( ) Johnson Referred To: /""/ ~ ~. APPRO~fVED BY y,~~ .~~: G Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator McGraw Nickens Robers r -~. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 22, 1989 RESOLUTION N0. 82289-7 APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM I - CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That that certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for August 22, 1989, designated as Item I - Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 3, inclusive, as follows: 1. Approval of Raffle Permit - Moose Lodge #284. 2. Approval of Raffle Permit - Northside Athletic Booster Club 3. Approval of a Raffle Permit and One Bingo Game - Penn Forest Elementary School PTA. 2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this resolution. On motion of Supervisor Johnson with Item 1 removed for a separate vote, seconded by Supervisor Nickens, and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None Item 1 moved by Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor Nickens and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None ABSTAIN: Supervisor McGraw A COPY TESTE: i' / /~~~~'c-~ ~- Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors CC: File Bingo and Raffle Permit File r ~ ACTION N0. A-82289-7.a ITEM NUMBER ~ ~' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: August 22, 1989 AGENDA ITEM: Request for approval of a Raffle Permit from the Northside Athletic- Booster Club COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Northside Athletic Booster Club has requested a Raffle Permit to hold a raffle on October 6, 1989. This application has been reviewed by the Commissioner of Revenue and he recommends that it be approved. The organization has paid the $25.00 fee. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the application for a Raffle Permit be approved. SUBMITTED BY: Mary H. Allen Clerk to the Board APPROVED BY: ,/Y~u~ v Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved (x) Motion by: Rnh T. .lnhncnn/ Yes No Abs Denied ( ) Har,-y ('_ _ Ni c~kPn c Garrett ~ Received ( ) Johnson _~~ Referred McGraw ~ To• Nickens x Robers ~_ cc: File Bingo/Raffle File _.-- COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA COMMISSIONER OF THE REVENUE APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO CONDUCT RAFFLES OR BINGO Application is hereby made for a bingo game or raffle permit. This application is made subject to all County and State laws, ordinances, rules, and regulations now in force, or that may be enacted hereafter and which are hereby agreed to by the under- signed applicant and which shall be deemed a condition under which this permit is issued. All applicants should exercise extreme care to ensure the accura- cy of their responses to the following questions. Bingo games and raffles are strictly regulated by Title 18.2-340.1 et. sig. of the criminal statutes of the Virginia Code, and by Section 4-86 et. seg. of the Roanoke County Code. These laws authorize the County Board of Supervisors to conduct a reasonable investiga- tion prior to granting a bingo or raffle permit. The Board has sixty days from the filing of an application to grant or deny the permit. The Board may deny, suspend, or revoke the permit of any organization found not to be in strict compliance with county and state law. Any person violating county or state regulations concerning these permits shall be guilty of a Class 1 misdemeanor. Any person who uses any part of the gross receipts from bingo or raffles for any purpose other than the lawful religious, charitable, community, or educational purposes for which the organization is specifi- cally organized, except for reasonable operating expenses, shall be guilty of a Class 6 felony. THIS APPLICATION IS FOR: (check one) RAFFLE PERMIT x BINGO GAMES Name of Organization Northside Athletic Booster Club Street Address 6758 Northside High School Road Mailing Address_ same as above___ _ . Clty, State, Zip Code Rt~annuP.Vir~inia 24n19-~Oln Purpose and Type of OrganizationRaise money to sur~plement athletics at Northside High and Northside Junior High. When was the organization founded? 1 ~~"` .~ Roanoke County meeting place? Northside ~iiah school Has organization been in existence in Roanoke County for two con- tinuous years? YES X NO Is the organization non-profit? YES x NO Indicate Federal Identification Number # 546143117 Attach copy of IRS Tax Exemption letter. Officers of the Organization: President: terry & Carolyn Riddleberg~ice-President Address: 6165 Buckland Mill Road N.ja. Address: Roanoke, Virginia 24019 Secretary: Address: see attached list of other officers Treasurer: Address: Member authorized to be responsible for Raffle or Bingo opera- tions: Name Vivian Holdren Home Address 532 inTater Oak Road_ Phone 563-5692 Bus . Phone A COMPLETE LIST OF THE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF CURRENT MEMBER- SHIP MUST BE FURNISHED WITH THIS APPLICATION. Specific location where Raffle or Bingo Game is to be conducted. Northside High School RAFFLESs Date of Drawing Oct. 6 dime of Drawing half time at Football g~ BINGO: Days of Week & Hours of Activity: N Sunday From To Monday From To Tuesday From To Wednesday From To Thursday From To Friday From To Saturday From To 2 ....L. _' ..~.. State specifically how the proceeds from the Bingo/Raffle will be used. List in detail the planned or intended use of the proceeds. Use estimates amounts if necessary. This raffle is to raise money to suppl~nent-the Athletic program at Northside High School and Northside Junior Nigh. The Ways and Means committee needs to raise $1900.00 for the 89-90 school year. This is one of their projects to help meet a total budget of $11,700.00 for this school year. Please see the attached list of this years budget and the allocations for the vaxious listed sports. NOT VALID UNLESS COUNTERSIGNED ~' "~- The above application, having been found in due form, is approved and issued to the applicant to have effect until December 31st of this calendar year. j. ,~ ~ ~ N Date Commi sinner the Revenue The above application is not approved. Date Commissioner of the Revenue 9 t BINGO: Complete the following: NSA Legal owner(s) of the building where BINGO is to be conducted: Name: Address: County State Zip Is the building owned by a 501-C non-profit organization?__ Seating capacity for each location: Parking spaces for each location: ALL RAFFLE AND BINGO APPLICANTS MUST ANSWER QUESTIONS 1 - 19 1. Gross receipts from all sources related to the operation of Bingo games or Instant Bingo by calendar quarter for prior calen- dar year period. BINGO N/~, INSTANT BINGO TT/A 1st Quarter 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter Total 1st Quarter 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter Total 2. Does your organization understand that it is a violation of law to enter into a contract with any person or firm, associa- tion, organization, partnership, or corporation of any classifica- tion whatsoever, for the purpose of organizing, managing, or con- ducting Bingo Games or Raffles? yes 3. Does your organization understand that it must maintain and file complete records of receipts and disbursements pertaining to Bingo games and Raffles, and that such records are subject to audit by the Commissioner of the Revenue? yes 4. Does your organization understand, that the Commissioner of the Revenue or his designee has the right to go upon the premises on which any organization is conducting a Bingo game or raffle, to perform unannounced audits, and to secure for audit all re- cords required to be maintained for Bingo games or raffles? Yes 4 5. Does your organization understand that a Financial Report must be filed with the Commissioner of the Revenue on or before the first day of November of each calendar year for which a per- mit has been issued? yes 6. Does your organization understand that if gross receipts ex- ceed fifty thousand dollars during any calendar quarter, an addi- tional Financial Report must be filed for such quarter no later than sixty days following the last day of such quarter?yes 7. Does your organization understand that the failure to file financial reports when due shall cause automatic revocation of the permit, and no such organization shall conduct any Bingo game or raffle thereafter until such report is properly filed and a new permit is obtained? yes 8. Does your organization understand that each Financial Report must be accompanied by a Certificate, verified under oath by the Board of Directors, that the proceeds of any Bingo game or raffle have been used for these lawful, religious, charitable, commu- nity, or educational purposes for which the organization is spe- cifically chartered or organized, and th~.t she operation of Bingo games or raffles have been in accordancF~ with the provisions of Article 1.1 of Chapter 8, Title 18.2 of the Code of Virginia? es 9. Does your organization understand that a one percent audit fee of the gross receipts must be paid to the County of Roanoke upon submission of the annual financial report due on or before the first of November? Yes 10. Does your organization understand that this permit is valid only in the County of Roanoke and only at such locations, and for such dates, as are designated in the permit application? ves 11. Does your organization understand that no person, except a bona fide member of any such organization who shall have been a member of such organization for at least ninety days prior to such participation, shall participate in the management, opera- tion, or conduct of any bingo game or raffle, and no person shall receive any remuneration for participating in management, operation, or conduct~of any such game or raffle? ves 12. Has your organization attached a check for the annual permit fee in the amount of $25.00 payable to the County of Roanoke, Virginia? yes 13. Does your organization understand that any organization found in violation of the County Bingo and Raffle Ordinance or X18.2- 340.10 of the Code of Virginia authorizing this permit is subject to having such permit revoked and any person, shareholder, agent, member or employee of such organization who violates the above to having such permit revoked and any person, shareholder, agent, member or employee of such organization who violates the above referenced Codes may be guilty of a felony? yes 5 14. Has your organization attached a complete list of its member- ship to this application form? yes 15. Has your organization attached a copy of its bylaws to this application form? yes 16. Has the organization been declared exempt from property taxa- tion under the Virginia Constitution or statutes? If yes, state whether exemption is for real, personal property, or both and identify exempt property. 17. State the specific type and purpose of the organization. Northside Athletic Booster Club -help su rt and raise money to sup anent t at etics at Northside High School and Northsi e Junior ~,.~ , H~ c wool . 18. Is this organization incorporated in Virginia? no If yes, name and address of Registered Agent: 19. Is the organization registered with the Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Affairs pursuant to the Charitable Solicitations Act, Section 57-48 of the Virginia Code? no (If so, attach copy of registration.) Has the organization been granted an exemption from registration by the Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Affairs? (If so, attach copy of exemption.) ALL RAFFLE APPLICANTS DESCRIBE TH'~ ARTICLES TO BE RAFFLED, VALUE OF SUCH ARTICLES, AND PROCEED TO NOTARIZATION. Article Description 2 tickets Washington D.C. Redskins / Tampa Bay Buckaneers Fair Market Value 5378.00 Stero System (possible) Cash pri$e $100-200 525.00-$50.00 6 ~;i j H ALL BINGO APPLICANTS MUST ANSWER QUESTIONS 20 - 27 BEFORE NOTARIZATION RAFFLE APPLICANTS, GO TO NOTARIZATION. 20. Does your organization understand that the bingo games shall not be conducted more frequently than two calendar days in any calendar week? 21. Does your organization understand that it is required to keep complete records of the bingo game. These records based on 518.2- 340.6 of the Code of Virginia and 54.98 of Roanoke County Code must include the following: a. A record of the date, quantity, and card value of instant bingo supplies purchased, as well as the name and address of the supplier of such instant bingo supplies, and written invoice or receipt is also required for each purchase of in- stant bingo supplies? b. A record in writing of the dates on ~~hich Bingo is played, the number of people in attendance ~sn each date, and the amount of receipts and prizes on each day? (These records must be retained for three years.) c. A record of the name and address of each individual to whom a door prize, regular or special Bingo game prize or jackpot from the playing of Bingo is awarded'? d. A complete and itemized record of all receipts and disburse- ments which support, and that agree with, the quarterly and annual reports required to be filed, and that these records must be maintained in reasonable order to permit audit? 22. Does your organization understand that instant Bingo may only be conducted at such time as regular Bingo game is in progress, and only at such locations and at such times as are specified in this application? 23. Does your organization understand that the gross receipts in the course of a reporting year from the playing of instant Bingo may not exceed 33 1/38 of the gross receipts of an organization's Bingo operation? 24. Does your organization understand it may not sell an instant Bingo card to an individual below sixteen years of age? 25. Does your organization understand that an organization whose gross receipts from all bingo operations that exceed or are ex- pected to exceed $75,000 in any calendar year shall have been granted tax-exempt status pursuant to Section 501 C of the United States Internal Revenue Service? (Certificate must be attached.) 7 26. Does your organization understand that a Certificate of Occu- pancy must be obtained or be on file which authorizes this use at the proposed location? 27. Does your organization understand that awards or prize money or merchandise valued in excess of the following amounts are illegal? a. No door prize shall exceed twenty-five dollars. b. No regular Bingo or special Bingo game shall exceed One Hund- red dollars. c. No jackpot of any nature whatsoever shall exceed One Thousand Dollars, nor shall the total amount of jackpot prizes awarded in any one calendar day exceed One Thousand Dollars. NOTARIZATION: TAE FOLLOWING OATH MUST BE TAKEN BY ALL APPLICANTS I hereby swear or affirm under the penalties of perjury as set forth in 518.2 of the Code of Virginia, that all of the above statements are true to the best of my knowledge, information, and beliefs. All questions have been answered. Signed by: Title Subscribed and sworn before me, My commission expires: rr ~ ~~ ~ ~~~~ `~'~ ~ l' ~~ ~~G~ 7r Home Address 4d~~, l!~- ~ ~ ~~>~ this ~~ day of 19_x_ RETURN THIS COMPLETED APPLICATION T0: -- ~' otary Public COMMISSIONER OF THE REVENUE P.O. Box 20409 Roanoke, VA 24,018-0513 8 NORTHSIDE ATHLETIC BOOSTER CLUB OFFICERS 1989-90 PRESIDENT; EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT: CONCESSIONS Assistants: FIRST VICE PRESIDENT: MEMBERSHIPS Assistants: SECOND VICE PRESIDENT: PROGRAMS Asslstants: THIRD VICE PRESIDENT: WAY b MEANS Assistants: RECORDING SECRETARY: CORRESPONDING SECRETARY: TREASURER: DIRECTORS: Barry & Carolyn Riddleberger Joe Hayes Mary Fisher Dave & Janet Green Mark & Linda Emick Jerry & Sherry Farrar Ellen Bailey Brenda Horne Pat & Butch Hatcher Vivian Holdren Rus & Gail Hamilton Freddie & Pat Crockett Maria Burke Gayle Richmond Betty Jo Vess Donna Henderson Dick Miley Jim Hickham Home: 563-2267 Office: 985-4021 Home: 366-0297 Home: 362-9603 Home: 563-0274 home: 366-6668 Home: 362-8249 Home: 366-5795 Dome: 366-4342 Home: 563-9413 Home: 563-5692 Nome: 366-9327 Home: 366-1625 Home: 563-0625 Home: 362-5171 Home: 562-1410 Home: 992-5333 Office: 561-8155 Home: 989-4802 Office: 561-8145 Home: •362-9204 Office: 561-8155 MEETINGS: 2nd & 4th Mondays (August - March) 2nd Monday (April - July) NORTHSIDE ATHLETIC BOOSTER CLUB SUBMITTED BUDGET FOR 1989-1990 INCOME: $ 3,500.00 Concessions 700.00 Program Sales 600.00 Memberships Program Advertisement 5,000.00 1,900'0 Special Projects $11,700.00 EXPENDITURES: $ 2,000.00 Program Printing 837.00 Administrative Expense 2,010.00 Junior High School Requests 6_ g53.0~ Senior High School Requests $11,700.00 Capitol Improvements (From Reserve) 1,000.00 ,, ~i~. /~~ SUBMITTED BUDGET FOR 1989-1990 JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL: $ 658.00 Football- (7) Stand up dummies, (7) arm shields 210.00 Wrestling- Headgear (15) 0.00 Boys Basketball- No Request 0.00 Boys Track- Request: .cavered by School 0.00 Girls Basketball- No Request 272.00 Volleyball- Judges Stand 240.00 Girls Track - Hurdles (6) 630.00 Cheerleading- Shell Tops (14) 0.00 Soccer - No Request $2010.00 SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL: $1809.00 Football- Tackleback Sled, (5) T-Boards, (4) Inseason Safety Squat Bars 1192.00 Basketball - Video Camcorder, Tripod, Building Materials for camera stand, (2) Instructional Video Tapes, (5) VHS Video Tapes, (2) Weighted Basketballs, (1) medicine ball 300.00 Golf- (15) Dozen Golf balls 398.00 Girls Track - (2) Stop watches, (5) Hurdles, (2) Sprinter Sleds 208.00 Boys Track - (2) Weight Vests, (2) Stop watches, (2) Long Jump Boards 306.00 Soccer - (5) Instructional Videos 200.00 Wrestling - Take Down Dummy 490.00 Girls Basketball - (15) Sweat Pants with hooded Sweat Jackets, (1) Video 393.00 Baseball - (4) Dozen Baseballs, (3) dozen Practice Balls (1) set of bases 700.00 Varsity Cheerleaders - New Jumpers (20) @ $70 each $1400 (approved $700) 500.00 J.V. Cheerleaders - (10) Skirts @$50 0.00 Cross Country - No Request 0.00 Tennis - No Request 0.00 Volleyball - No Request 357.00 Entry Fees, Girls Track, Boys Track, Cross~Country, Wrestling $6853.00 ~~, NfJ~THSI DE- ATHLETIC :g0.OS'CEF~ •. CLUB L.'~~~,: MEMbEC~?fiH I P ~ c: ~~ ~#~" = F'a i d 7 :#: 6.1 1 Buc k: I and Mi I I F:d . 3F~:~--'31 Ua' . ' ' A I I en :#: 51 ~:~ Cr at_tn Lane 0~ ~._- 3::, 35 Anderson, F'aul ber t M ? :#: E3~•3 Gr eer~way Dr . 06f~,-E,t;r70 '35 u ~ At ~_ h I .: y, E I i ~ . 3EE,-57 bai I ey, EI I en ~a Jerry ~: 5811 Th~~~rnr~~se 55~+Cr Ambassador 563-•171 ~, Bartai~ari, Ari~edeo ~~ El ean~_~r :#: :#: 851'3 Bu I I i ngton Dr . ~~~`-t~3>3,3 ` ' Barnett r G~~ver nor Dr . :#: 1'31 c 3 fJC-. ~~,C , Bauer , Hari k: 9_~ Mary _ :#: 561'3 Oak:l grid blvd j~ 3~~-'~ J' ' bent I ey, Der:ter $,. Mary Dr ~S 3E,~'-•~'3 Bl ak:e, bertha . :#: 5615 Hal ~~urrr :#: 1t7~7 Gr~_~ve Lar7e 3(~~:-5'3031 BI anE::enship, F:onzei R< Judy ::lJ+- Absa l ~_~n Srr~i t h F:d . # 3 ,~8~•-.E,7~::7 Blevins, Elx . . ~ B~~~wri~an •#' :#: 0'301 Dairy F'd • ._J 6 ..J ~_'~j J 7^4',17 Br ak:ens, Theresa 8 Wela<.:~t er F:d . :#: X30 ~ ;;E,fa-1:~'_:~:7 Br ari~n~er , D . . :#: ^ 1'3 C I ubh~_~use Dr . _ E+r i sc oe r Char I es ,:, E:., ~. .~ ~ . Br ~.~wr~ :#: 5'31 1 Waybt.tr n Dr 56`'--- ' ~ ~.,~_. Br owr~ r Jari~es . :#: 650~~ Gr eenway ant a Anita Tr . ~~ 577 `=~6 _i ~6~'S Bur k: e r Ed ~: Maria . . :#: :#: <:g~•5 Di. ~ i ~~~rr~at Dr . fC=7 _.t-~ _;'::: Bt_tr ger ~",G :#: ~.~.~ Water Oak: F: Byrd Cari~pbe I I , F:a I ei yh :#: N~~7r t h Spring 36:x-`.a5~4::'_ Carty, David P: k:ebe7_~_a :#: 5307 Daytona F:d. d ~ SS`~.__7~#E:,E~ Cat r on . : :#: E,6E,i ~ Bradshaw f St 563.-•:~ 177 Cheathari„ David ?< 5haron . :#: 67~z M~.F°::inney 3E,E,--E:,53~• :#: 1'3~E M~_~nt~~ I air C~_7b~.trn, Bane C~_lnner •#• :#~ 1:31 N~_~ver Ave. ~ ~ , C~~~nner, Th~~~ri~as ^-,i ~ Gar n~an Dr . :#: 6:~. 36:x-:~7r:~ Cr i rii, Dar r y I ?< Susan & Cinder , :#: ~:ir~#5 Laurel W~~,~_,ds Curfiss, Lawren7~e r.tr, k::athy r:C-L? i•~„ ''#`" ;;66-•-1=flip ~ . Dari~peer , k::e I I y ?~ Linda :#: 7~#~ r•:_' Estes St . Tavern F:d . O I d ~ 5E=,3-:~:~ J 1 Derry, Bud e yO3 :#: 8 :#: 8:15 Hunters Trai I 36 -,-- F3E;~3:~:: ' Di I I...n :#: 176 Th~_~ri~pson Me«~. Dr. jf~7--3~; 7:~ Dt.unf~w~rd, D~~nna Dungy:' an s Any i e c: C-L :~ :#: :#~ 5533 Twi I iyht F:d. 56^-,--'3~~-~~7 vy F:ronnie E::ch~~~ls, Larry 831: Webster Dr 366-•-f.-.,E,E~f3 Eri~il.k:, Mark: °< Linda :#: :#: 1:1 F'eturn F:d. vy Sherr Farrar, Jerry Y :#: 551'3 F I ~~~r i st F:d • Fer guson r Vernon :#: f3533 M~.ti r f i e l d Ci. r. ^_-,E~:_.-.~ 173 F I aen~~~r , D~:~t :#: Eic~rir F'I ar7tati~°~n Cir. 366-: : ~'::f'3 _ FI r_~ra, AI I en P: EI I en Shir I ey ~ :#: ~#'33i? Eastcial e Cir. 3F:,~-tMr~'Jj l : ' -~ Freel and, Ge~_~rge :#: 176• F:ead Mt . F:d . , :~f 56~;-:L Frye/F:7:,binette c:C-L:~ 81:~' Tink:err.Jal e :#: E ~6~-~;:_;~: - Gibson, Frank: ?: Car~~~l , ':~4 W~-~~-lcihaven :~: 7•: 3j:;';~-- I'3:~'f~ Gray. Cur t i ~ _ :#: 73t~r1 'C'ir•tk:er View Greene, Dave :#: 517: N~~1rth I_ak:a Dr. ;6F,-C~1~7 Guynn, Jiri~ ?: D~~I~~res :#: >316 F'eyt 1~~n St . 366-f-,G61 Hat f i e I d, F'au I 9: Judy Hayes, Dr.t ?: J~~~e Henderson, Dunna .t•~endri~~k:s, Fray e< Patricia ='Hi I I , Tin. of Jacy~.rel ine Hogan H~,~nak:er Hurd, Jai=E. EK Wanda Hyi tt~n, Char I es °y Freda Jac E:sun Jan~~es, Char I es ~: Patsy Junes, F+arbara p< David Janes r F'at °< C7I enn J~ ~rdan, Char I es ?~ Marce I I a f~:ef fee F::i ri~ber I i n, Arlie °< F'ari~ k::c~nrad, L-sud 8< F~:aren Leftwich, Lewis 8< M~w~nna I_i. fe, Gar I and 9~ E~rencia L_ik:ens, F~:aren L~~~cFi Haven Country CI i_rL~ L_oti~pe L~-~wi ng Lowe, Darrell ?< Virginia Lucas, D~_~n :#: r F!r yarn C i r c I~ ~~3i X66-t_r~•~7 _ :#: 6536 Gr eenway Dr . :#: F'0 E~u x '586, Hu I I i ns Cu I I ege J88_-5878 :#: 138 C I ~rbF~ause Dr . :#: 7:}i~~~ Eiarrens F:d. :#: 113 Verndal e 366-11~iE-~ :#: 3r~31 F I i rl t F:d . 38.1--G636 563--i~#38 :#: i7Cr8 Bbrringtc~n 36•'^•-~# 17~:~ :#: 7:c3: Q I d Mtn . F:d . 3f~6•-71r:r5 :~ 5763 Santa Anna Terr . :#: 575 Santa Anita Ter . 3 C7.r'B`t CJrJ :#: 818: Hunters Tr ai I 583--5~:r i E~ :#~ 8:~~#5 Wat er f a I I Dr . 583._i r~75 :#: 67ir~.~ F"air Qak:s 36:x-,mr~~1r~~ 583-4~#F~87 :#: 5783 I_i t t I et can F:d . 36:x:--~?~:F~7 :#: 5151 W i p l e ci a l e :#: 'fir:~6 Starrr~~~nt Ave. 3E,6-i. i.7.a. :#• F'0 Erg-~~. 7' 1:'.E3 uFi.~:-':jJ i':~ :#: 738 Ac car n Tr . 3 f„_'_f3888 .#. 8~# 18 F:~~d I and F:ci . ~8,. --71':.~~ :#: 5558 Cap i t ~ ~ St . JF ~:..-5=8,~ :#: 5'13 V1 I I age Ln. Ma I I ar d , L_•. we I I :~ Jcryc ~ :#: ~u~ ~7 N•-~r t h S r i n Dr . ~~±,_•E3253 Manni rig :#: 214 F' I yhyC,Uth Dr . 77.1 362-::' Martin , Mears ~ k~:ay :#: 6724 Laban Dr . _ 362__~;;«4;i r Mar t i nd a Ir, Wm °< £iar bar a :#: 27c~-4 Eri~bassy ,63__c=r ~ 1 M,_Firide, Wrii °< Lee :#: 4ir14 DraE::e Cir. :#: 34'? i Fc~r est H i I I Ave . -, ~__, ~E;6--~'•~'-i 1 MAW C~~wn McCrady, Tarry ?< Jc~y,-e •#. 6534 Trevi I ian F:d 563- x_6:15 ,63-1E:',4c:r c M~~Ghee :#: 47:~:~ Arnold Dr. _ [~ G rVJ7 JGJ-'~ Mck;en~ie, Mi~~hael ?: Linda :#: 40'3 F'etty Ave. :#: 5234 N~w~rth Spring Dr. - 563_..cj;~:E34 M~wNulty, Jerry ~ C~~,I leer :#: 6155 C~~pper Circ I e _ Mi I E,,., Mi I I er, M.F. :#: F'0 B~W~ 13386 563-':~4'3'~i Mi tche I I , Ji I I :#: 5554 Deer Park: Dr . x;63-'i 1 c~r ~ Mc~rtc~n ~: 1'342 Gc~vernar Dr. . 36~:-1 ' `'# ,v. Mundy, Ja~~ k. _< Sue :#: 7i-r51 I r c~nda I e Cr . ^E;~:--cj7::~4 ` ~~'Mi I ey, Di ~~ k: ~: F'0 ~ic~~~ 20715 ' 36:~~-8884 ?: J~~~ani Na f f , Gary :#: 68':7 Tink:erdal e E:,'=i a 3E:Fa- i Ni ~_ hc~ I s, F'c~ger :#: '848 Tu I I y I)r . . 3E~:~~-1438 p I i ver , Mi E:e °: L_c~r et t a ~: 56c~r4 Dayt r_,na Or~tiver~-~s, Efrin :#: 51ir8 Tari~arisk: Cir. C7wens :#: 5780 Sierra Dr. 563-_4E;~;`3 Padgett, Wi. I i iarr, :#: 70:`;i~ Nc~rthway Dr. exit I)r J~Jf-,,-3:~7E; F'a I riper i , Ni ~~ k: ~: Anr7a Mae . :#: 1 c~r45 F:l dgY•c r D 563•-°47 j. ~# 9: L_i nda F'ar sc,ns, Ed r . :#: 7073 Nc~r t hway St 36;x•-U59E, Partridge, T. . :#: 4726 Lantern :#: 2842 Di p I c,rr~at Dr . 563--57~i: Fayna, S~.ce F'ick:eral , Gary R.~ Margaret :#: 1015 F:idgecrest Dr. ^-,i~ 366--3i F'c,r t er , J arises 9-~ Sue :#: 7131 c:~ A I p i ne Dr . F d . 36E;-4'x'7;:: v Py I es, Eii I I ~ F:ut h : . :#: 68c;r7 TinE::ercial e ~rk:s Dr F- i ";E,:,:--':i i. 81 Fdithards~_~n, Chas $.. Shirleen . ~ n :#: 7:'74 Tw 36:L^_,~Scj4 F:ichri~c~nd, Ja~~E; :#: 670'3 Heath Cir. :~:°-`~ 171 3E 9~ Ga I e '~CicF~n•~c~nd, F'hi I I ip Y :#: 8174 Wat er f a I I Dr . , 5Fa~3-::~yE~7 „ Ftiiddl eberger, Carol yn$<Ecarry ~ :#: 616 Eic_cr,_kl and Mi I I F'd ^84-E-.,£:31 E3 R~~~berts, D~augl as ':c Lorraine . :#: 4745 Carvers C~~~ve ;6E,-'i1':~F~ F:c~b~rts, Stephen ~: F:ebecca :#: 634c:r Greenway Dr. ~::-.-8'3'~i7 ;;E: F:~~~nk:, Deanie :#: 07 Or I andc~ , 3&~F~--74t:-,`, F:usse I i :#: ;'336 Flint F:d. F:yan, CI ara ~: 1318 Cr~ctchfiel d :#: 5':40 8u~~ k: I and Mi I I F:d . 36(x--1741 Sarver Sbc ~l" ay, ~:caber t oy L.l nda :$: ~'i7:~:3 Cap ]. t ~~~~~• t . "'6~'°-E38E38 r: ~~i ) 36:c~--'~: :#: 58':2 Ecu~_ k: l and Mi I i F:d . , S~=ales Sc:haef fer Trc..cck:ing :#: 5333 End i ~~ ~~,t t St . 36'.--177c,r 384•-E:,'jc~r'3 5hr i ver :#: ^^.f^ Garvens Ca~:.e F:d. '`'" `' :, '~-°:::'~3` 3E: Sink:, Larry :#: 74.3 Greenwich . , ~--c34.73 1 3f Sink:, Wayne ~: Car~:~l yn :#: 51::_5 N~~~rt;h I_ak:es Dr. , ~ 36F,--ir;:~E:,E, 59. :,bey, Tc~rr~ °y Connie :#: 1'3c"ri Gc~vernc~r Dr. - '~;63-i~67 3 S I c~nr•, D~1na I d ?: Hi I da ern :#: 5536 Sweet F ~ Sprui I 1 , H~~~racc '~ ~;canny ~: 8125 WetaSter I)r. ' -46::7 3E;::° ~, .~t a f f,_~r d :#: 6c~r7 Magna i i a F:d . _ 3E;1-411 E3 St; ewar t , F:~~~ber t :#: 67c-rs3 Gar rr~ar~ Dr . Ti I I er, Wayne °< Mi I dy :#: 4'3ir7 Lantern St. F:d - 3E,;r__'3f-a~1'~i T~~~wnsend, F'. A. pa Sandra . fink:erview :#: 74~::'3 563-'~i1:~'7 ;#: 6irit3-, J~znda Dr. = Tt~cnst a I I , Stuart °y Debra :#: 13c~r Clr I ando Ave. ~ ' Turner, F'at Vests, E~etty Jc~ 2~ M~~nty WeI I s, T~~by °< Nar,~.y West , ~:. Wt,atr I y, Mar y Wi I sor,, Larry q< W~~~~~~d, Ji ra W~:,~,~ds, ~:i~_F,ard fs.L serllar y ~< Deb~~~r ah :#: 2747 Errlbassy Dr . ~~'~-`•.~4~ ~E' :#: 513 Will edade u66-~E:3`:; ~i. :#: )rf~_~r: 15a--A, Tr~~~utva. I I e '~':~~~-C:,1:.:.v .#• 13c_)5 Gates G1 Y ~~ Ir_ 36.:~--c3.`.~ i 6 :#: 5415 ql d M~_~ur,tain ~:d. X66•-76~~W1 :#: ~;~# 18 Baurilar, Ur . G6~~:--.~Gi >1:3 :#: Nurthside Tr. 561-E3145 :#: 4c~ 1 Heclye l awr, Ave . 366-E3'~:6~:; ~~/ CONSTITUTIOOFAND BY-LAWS NORTHSIDE ATHLETIC BOOSTER CLUB ARTICLE I. Name and location: of this association shall be NORTHSIDE c ion 1. Se t The name ATHLETIC BOOSTER CLUB. 2 Q at Northside Its principal locot~on g i . Section V inia r High School, Roan k , Section 3. The purpose for which the clhases ofgathletics~ t all p To promote and suppor Northside High School and thet~inan eunior at High School, as submitted by lements chool board supp resent committee, for which the s coach's salary and approved by membership p rent r at the meeting in wh~c$ tro~a~dge(See Finances resented fo pp i s p year Article IV-Section 3) ARTICLE II. OFFICERS; lub shall be a President, Section 1. The officers of this c and/or Co-Presidents, in ehpresidettt~nFirste has a vote, Executive Vic Vice President, Second Vice PresidentCorrespondence Vice President, Recording Secretary, who s d l Secretary, and a Treasurer, hold off ice ll and sha ' for the team of one year, elected and are duly until their successors installed. Section 2. The officers shall ir tlmeeCingnin ~~ f each s membership at the f ear or year and said officers shaelectedeandei stalled. until successors are duly Serve as an Only members of the booster club may officer of this club. on 3. Secti The directors shall serve hallt-'6e aemember of the . sident s P re ast immediate p ca acity only, advisory P Board of Directo~i ~ v leges without voting p Section 4. oint a nomi ~ mmit. ee rs The President shall apP s a r ° ate of nomine -~fea e y o f ch whic~l sha11_.~ubmit a d rectors__at __the_ f first meet ng ~~~~rom_ehe 'and d~ b . yeah., Additional nominations ~ roviding the eeting in May ~ erson being floor at the first m person making the nominatioooda$aanding with the in g nominated is a member the nomination. Club prior to A ~- - 2 - _ i ` ARTICLE II. OFFICERS CONTINUED: ' Section 5. This Club shall be mllaincludeatheaeight (8)loff icers. directors, which sha ood standing of Each director shall be a member in g the Club. ARTICLE III. DUTIES OF THE OFFICERS: 1, Section The President, or in his absence the sep~ ~~~ Club. reside ll h e l p a committee officer, s a financ oint The President shall app consisting of fht Cluberpnetbei grdesignated a&_ _.--- he non-officers o Chairperson. The President shall submit nhMa u~ortmembershipoming i year at the first meeting roved can be changed only proval. The budget if app Board of Directors a h p e by seven of the twelve reh anges~ t voting for the change o Section 2. The Executive Vice Presonde88ionslandeshallokeeplrecords~ ll ort at the operation of a icheckingraccount of all transacti t l h a e aepara a keep hall each meeting. S Tt~e treasurer shall issue a tand • . on concession s starting check for ~'_~,C~G_D0 ion 3. Sect The first Vice President shale b ersepaYntheir dues that all m membership and see membership card and decal. and receive a G, Section The second Vice President shall be responsible for of the football and make-up sale of advertisements ponsible for selling the s hall be r d a n s programs an programs at each home g Section 5. The third Vice President shall be responsible for activities). (all fund raising Ways and Means. f Section 6. Section 7. The Recording Secretary shall keep the minutes o all meetings of the Club and ~ alto theuClubiand shall___ all. records and papers belc~xlg g perform all such other duties as are incident to this office. shall wxite all letters The Correspondence Secretary pertaining to this organization. Shat l prepare all newsletters from tosition,and other duties as are incident to this p - 3 - ARTICLE III. DUTIES OF THE OFFICERS CONTINUED: ~.' Section 8. The Treasurer shall receiveden~ o~nExecutiveeViceb and h the Presi i t shall, along w President, sign all checks of the Club; shall, keep and experidituresi shall accurate records of receipts statement of account t af h pox~i ~ llcr a a e t presen e a u permanent records and present All Club books are to be end of the fiscal year. ~'such other ear ch o t 3 e a a y audited ea n .d i . pos this nt to duties as are inci e + ion 9. Sect The Directors shall direct and give advice to th~e~~ Club and assist in any way h e new officers of t for the betterment of the Club. _ ~ ARTICLE IV. FINANCES; Section 1, All expenditures in excess of twenty-five dollars the finance co d b e rtt y must be approve approval, hei f bmitted to the membership 2 Section . being su of each The Board shall. decide at its arc meeteag will be com ng y h e year whether the budget for t ol Improvement budget or Sports budget and/or it C ~ a~ a _ _ b o tT1. . Section 3. ~ T:- ~„~~Pr_ for the coming year shall be drafted_b~ ~ _= two non=officg~$,._. to easurer T , r the President, tie-pres~erited~tio the_ mem~6exs -F i~P the first meeting t _in- May°`for _ approval . - Section 4. Budget requests shall be submitnodlatertthaniA rilel5th,' ll coaches i and principal from a The Athletic Director and Principal shall review a i a requests before presentin$ntorderot at the budget ~ ril 30th, . A b p y committee yembNr s ~he q and presented to - o ME re i up uests can be set approval a t the firs t meet~p$ed by the Px' inc ipa 1 l g ess will be honored un uest and/or the Athletic of the school making req Director. -••~ In absence of a Coach, the Athletic Direuestsand/or hool shall sub S r c Principal. of the through the , onl be ode' y Additional requests may Principal of the school during the year. ., ARTICLE V. MEETINGS: Section 1, Regular meetings of the Club shall ontheslofo~t~t nda M m t th f l E ~_n ~ our second and Monday. Specia through Mar . as deemed necessary h ~~- e me~~ ngs of the Club may be by the executive board h torsspresent Di u tB ree of oard e two-thirds majority of t be transacted ox•. at any meeting before any busl.ness can _-- ~ _ a _w - ~} - ARTICLE VI. OPERATIONS OF CLUB: Section 1. The Club shall present the "Most Valuable Players Award" each year. The recipient of the award shall be selected by the voting of only the head coaches of all varsity sports. and the Athletic Director. They shall vote in secret for five ahtletes based - on leadership ability and five based on athletic cond worth ability. First place worth five points, se four points and etc. Awards shall be presented on Awards Day Assimbly. Section 2. In the evenC of the vacancy of any officer or Director;- fill the remainder of his term shall his successor to be appointed by the remaining members of the Board of Directors. Section 3. The officers and new members of the Board of Directors shall take office the first meeting in June. Section 4. Thy annual dues shall be $5.00 per Year per family or , V to June t. Membership runs from June l~ Section 5. At no time shall the Club'be involved in the selection, coach or his staffs f any dismissal or recommendation o director or member representing officer ll an h , y a nor s the Club be involved in the selection, dismissal or recommendation of any coach or his staff, other than an employee of the Roanoke County Schools. ARTICLE VII. AMENDMENTS: Section 1 Amendments to these Sy-Laws may be made by a majority . vote of all the members present at any melting, pro- vided notice of intention to amend has been given by . the By-Laws committee, having been reviewed and These By-Laws forehand b . e studied by the committee to be reviewed and amendments recommended by the are committe each year. ALL BY-LAWS WERE REVIEWED BY THE COMMITTEEfbN DECEMBER 28, 1981 WITH MINOR AMENDMENTS RECOMMENDED TO THE BOARD ON JANUARY lj., 1982 WHICH WERE APPROVED. ACTION N0. A-82289-7.b ITEM NUMBER' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: August 22, 1989 AGENDA ITEM: Request for approval of a Raffle Permit from the Penn Forest Elementary School PTA COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Penn Forest Elementary School PTA has requested a Raffle Permit and Bingo Permit for one game only to be held on October 28, 1989. This application has been reviewed by the Commissioner of Revenue and he recommends that it be approved. The organization has paid the $25.00 fee. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the application for a Raffle Permit be approved. SUBMITTED BY: Mary H. Allen Clerk to the Board APPROVED BY: Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator -------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved (x) Motion by: Rob t ,7ohn~on/Harrys. Yes No Abs Denied ( ) N; c-kPns Garrett x Received ( ) Johnson x Referred McGraw x Nickens x To• Robers x cc: File Bingo/Raffle File ~- COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA COMMISSIONER OF THE REVENUE APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO CONDUCT RAFFLES OR BINGO Application is hereby made for a bingo game or raffle permit. This application is made subject to all County and State laws, ordinances, rules, and regulations now ire dcto by the undere enacted hereafter and which are hereby ag signed applicant and which shall be deemed a condition under which this permit is issued. All applicants should exercise extreme care to ensure the accura- cy of their responses to the following questions. Bingo games and raffles are strictly regulated by Title 18.2-340.1 et. se . f the criminal statutes of the Virginia Code, and by Shor ze 0 4-86 et. seg. of the Roanoke County Code. These laws au the County Board of Supervisors to conduct a reasonable investiga- tion prior to granting a bingo or raffle permit. The Board has sixty days from the filing of an application to grant or deny the permit. The Board may deny,inustrict compliancetwitheeounty and organization found not to be state law. Any person violating county or state regulations concererson hwho permits shall be guilty of a Class 1 misdemeanor. Any p uses any part of the gross receipts from bingo or raffles for any purpose other than the lawful religious, charitable, community, or educational purposes for which the organization is specifi- cally organized, except for reasonable operating expenses, shall be guilty of a Class 6 felony. THIS APPLICATION IS FOR: ( check one ) i0 N%~ ' 3 ~m RAFFLE PERMIT ~ BINGO GAMES ~/ dN~~ i iME LRn'~t UNL~ PeNN rare ;t ~lerner~t~sz~ ~ehcx~l PTA Name of Organization Street Address (,? ,3~ ~ ~Erl~im/~N R !~ ~~ Vy' ~GANVk~ V'A Mailing Address jHIYK, /a `~ H~~c'~1~ City, State, Zip Code ~CO~-NyK~ ~ V i Rte' iN ~~ ~ `~ U i ~ Purpose and Type of Organization ~I~mc=NTH~~ 5C' ~-iCX~t--~ When was the organization founded? ~~ ~ ~- 1 S- .~ Roanoke County meeting place? ~'ENt~" 1-U~tST SL'r~O~L- Has organization been in existence in Roanoke County for two con- tinuous years? YES= NO Is the organization non-profit? YES /_ NO Indicate Federal Identification Number # 5~. - I ~- ~~ ~ y Attach copy of IRS Tax Exemption letter. Officers of the Organization: ~N~ / ~-"" ~ vice-President ~.:Jr~ne ~~ ~liY~ar1 President: /~1nn / h~Lke~' Address: ~;3~~~ ~Nv"~~i,~) I~C,~.SiJAddress: Q~'~~'7 ~V~ekl-II~L 12r~~c.J _St~) i5D/~t1DPCe. U~.~ 2yG~~ I~UF~r~ol~~- v°h1 . 2~F0~ ~,~Gt.tlRl~ QAr~2~,/ Treasurer: ~~heR~~ ~t~.IC•5inl~~~'~ Secretary: ~7?~ ~c~bol nk l-r~. 5~:~ Address: ,~(~G~. ~`er~ti~ ~A,l Sc.~'! Address: ' Member authorized to be responsible for Raffle or Bingo opera- tions: r Name_ At~~C2, n ~.- ~u~e Home Address ~5~ ~ ~ ~~nCi a i~"i ~r. -JSLt,) ~c;~-`~DkF.. 2 SID ~ Phone ~1'7'~ ~ ~~ `7~ ~ Bus . Phone nt~n ~ A COMPLETE LIST OF THE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF CURRENT MEMBER- SHIP MUST BE FURNISHED WITH THIS APPLICATION. ~;N J=1 L~ 1 ~ n ee d ~~- . Specific location where Raffle or Bingo Game is to be conducted. ~~Nlu - U~~ 5T ~Lt~~E-~T(~k y ~aCr-L'aC, ~o RAFFLES: Date of Drawing IU Z~' h"1 Time of Drawing / ~ ~~n BINGOS Days of Week & Hours of Activity: Sunday -Monday '-Tuesday -Wednesday --Thursday Friday Saturday From To_ From To From ___ To__-____ _-_ From To _ Fro To From To From /~ To : cc~ m (cane D/~~ g~,~~e or~~ y) 2 ~_ - State Listlincdetailothehplannedeor intended usegofRthelproceedse used. Use estimates amounts if necessary. ice ~ ~vCs ~ f' vu~ ~`'A ~-~'/~ Cli?C~ ~~~~v ~,;~i/ ~ c A /"10~ £~ U r~ m ~ rat' C` ~( ~E' ~' .e n t l ~.l hG t ~ ~t C~G C~ fE~ G~. C.i~ ~/ 'E~ t G~ ~ t C' cl f~ , _J .J C) :i5 tr'3 t ~_ h ~ /C ~~ ~4 ~'nhrne~ tie= ~~~u~~~flc~~ G~~ our CJ>;l~re.r~ 3 .~.~... " NOT VALID UNLESS COUNTERSIGNED The above application, having been found in due form, is approved and issued to the applicant to have effect until December 31st of this calendar year. j; i - `/ ~ ~~ D~ Commis Toner of he Revenue The above application is not approved. Date Commissioner of the Revenue 9 F BINGO: Complete the following: Legal owner(s) of the building where BINGO is to be conducted: Name: (~a~n~k.~ ~`~ur~t,l Address: County ~UFj~'1©~Z State ~~~• Zip Is the building owned by a 501-C non-profit organization?__~ J Seating capacity for each location: f~-lr"~ ~-G-~r'~"~` ~." IPrri . `7~c~~y~~l Parking spaces for each location: 1~~'r~ r~ ~-o r rSt ~ IPrr~ ~~' he>c>~ ALL RAFFLE AND BINGO APPLICANTS MUST ANSWER QUESTIONS 1 - 19 1. Gross receipts from all sources related to the operation of Bingo games or Instant Bingo by calendar quarter for prior calen- dar year period. BINGO INSTANT BINGO 1st Quarter 1 h+`a u-' ~ ~ I 1st Quarter ~~ ~~ or~~ 2nd Quarter dad y,~rne 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter ~r~,,y~ -c, -- 3 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter 4th Quarter Total Total 2. Does your organization understand that it is a violation of law to enter into a contract with any person or firm, associa- tion, organization, partnership, or corporation of any classifica- tion whatsoever, for the purpose of organizing, managing, or con- ducting Bingo Games or Raffles? ~/~. 3. Does your organization understand that it must maintain and file complete records of receipts and disbursements pertaining to Bingo games and Raffles, and that such records are subject to audit by the Commissioner of the Revenue?_,T C.S 4. Does your organization understand. that the Commissioner of the Revenue or his designee has the right to go upon the premises on which any organization is conducting a Bingo game or raffle, to perform unannounced audits, and to secure for audit all re- cords required to be maintained for Bingo games or raffles? F' •`~ -r 4 5. Does your organization understand that a Financial Report must be filed with the Commissioner of the Revenue on or before the first day of November of each calendar year for which a per- mit has been issued? ~PS Nt+w~J~-"' C~~lr r~~~tE +s ia~z~s i,~nci ~t i,~c~tld ~ A k~- ~w ~'e w clay ~ t-c.~ c~j~t U~iv re. {x,r+ ~ n 6. Does your organization understand that if gross receipts ex- ceed fifty thousand dollars during any calendar quarter, an addi- tional Financial Report must be filed for such quarter no later than sixty days following the last day of such quarter? ~ 7. Does your organization understand that the failure to file financial reports when due shall cause automatic revocation of the permit, and no such organization shall conduct any Bingo game or raffle thereafter until such report is properly filed and a new permit is obtained? 8. Does your organization understand that each Financial Report must be accompanied by a Certificate, verified under oath by the Board of Directors, that the proceeds of any Bingo game or raffle have been used for these lawful, religious, charitable, commu- nity, or educational purposes for which the organization is spe- cifically chartered or organized, and that the operation of Bingo games or raffles have been in accordance with the provisions of Article 1.1 of Chapter 8, Title 18.2 of the Code of Virginia? u e 5 9. Does your organization understand that a one percent audit fee of the gross receipts must be paid to the County of Roanoke upon submission of the annual financial report due on or before the first of November? ~.~~ ~ ~!R~7 ~ ~ HAv~ (-~~ e~`-E~~stion ir= -~ neec~~.c~- -~'or~ irPas~rrrr +c' ~' ~ it o~~+ .-e~~c~rt 10. Does your organization understand that this permit is valid only in the County of Roanoke and only at such locations, and for such dates, as are designated in the permit application? ~ P.~ 11. Does your organization understand that no person, except a bona fide member of any such organization who shall have been a member of such organization for at least ninety days prior to such participation, shall participate in the management, opera- tion, or conduct of any bingo game or raffle, and no person shall receive any remuneration for participating in management, operation, or conduct, of any such game or raffle? U 12. Hastheuamountnofa$25n00tpay ble toe the Countyaof Roanoket fee in Virginia?~~ `.~ 13. Does your organization understand that any organization found in violation of the County Bingo and Raffle Ordinance or 518.2- 340.10 of the Code of Virginia authorizing this permit is subject to having such permit revoked and any person, shareholder, agent, member or employee of such organization who violates the above to having such permit revoked and any person, shareholder, agent, member or employee of such organization who violates the above referenced Codes may be guilty of a felony? 'r 5 14. Has your organization attached a complete list of its member- ship to this application form? 1'1Q C'uil> r~~..e, it ne~c~r-~(~ 15. Has your organization attached a copy of its bylaws to this application form? ~1 ~ `~ 16. Has the organization been declared exempt from property taxa- tion under the Virginia Constitution or statutes?_~ S If yes, state whether exemption is for real, pers nal property, or both and identify exempt property. P i ra O~~ n5 ,f7,Q,,,T,~C'_`~C) nrll.• ~r~ '.rf 17. State the specific type and purpose of the organization. ~U h2in r~hr~nee -ti-'he.. er#uc(~~~cr1 o c~~ir e' 18. Is If yes, this organization incorporated in Virginia? name and address of Registered Agent: 19. Is the organization registered with the Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Af.f_airs pursuant to the Charitable Solicitations Act, Section 57-48 of the Virginia Code? Y» (If so, attach copy of registration.) Has the organization been granted an exemption from registration by the Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Affairs? (If so, attach copy of exemption.) ALL RAFFLE APPLICANTS DESCRIBE THE ARTICLES TO BE RAFFLED, VALUE OF SUCH ARTICLES, AND PROCEED TO NOTARIZATION. Article Description ~~:~~"~~ C~ Fair Market Value ~_~ i ~ ~;r~~-,~~~ ~ ~ ~~._~ ~ ~ ~. (Fr tae;; ~e ~ rr~vs~ ,~ , n'1C~r THA ~NUr.)N,5 (.Ciric~ - nay u=~~TCY: CLic~f~~ 3 U n e la.~ i' e k N;(",AnO K e I~ i H ~e ~~ CL C` ~ u t3 ~• (,V %I LL ryl~~'T" GIFT C~~ ~ ~cr~r~. 5. L~rCuf+ C~~~~ ~ ~Uarn ~~X 1p . (1'li~C.. (11T~. 1 HCAT"f~-. ~.~ +~ck~+s~ r7 ~1 I~reclo,y k~~ i Au~~-~r~T" ~ I~I~~~~S SITS ~NS~i,aur AnT" c~ ~l~r I~t' `~ ~E~S 1 P1 u rangy ~ ~~(~ . D U ~o,oo ~ ~ C . C, ~~ ~ I5 ,ov .~ :~C:~ .~~p 6 ~ 15 , c~ ~} (1C~ ~~iiJGv~ O~ r~ ~- are sr~c.c. (,t;"0.I T'~ ~7.y ~pr~ ~he5~ ~~~ It~rr~.5 ALL BINGO APPLICANTS MUST ANSWER QUESTIONS 20 - 27 BEFORE NOTARIZATION RAFFLE APPLICANTS, GO TO NOTARIZATION. 20. Does your organization understand that the bingo games shall not be conducted more frequently than two calendar days in any calendar week? U~ `~ -- hr~+.L-~v~~~- o~~ Y,. f3i~G~' G--~~,~ }5 ~r~1y ~ ~r.~ ~--irn~ ~;~rr~e ~~~r Lia?~l~~~ly 5C1~~~ C'r1-Kr~ivr=1~ . 21. Does your organization understand that it is required to keep completof rtherCode f VirginiaamandTS4s98r of RoanokedCountyl Code 340.6 must include the following: a. A record of the date, quantity, and card value of instant bingo supplies purchased, as well as the name and address of the supplier of such instant bingo supplies, and written invoice or receipt is also required for each purchase of in- stant bingo supplies? b. A record in writing of the dates on which Bingo is played, the number of people in attendance on each date, and the amount of receipts and prizes on each day? (These records must be retained for three years.) c. A record of the name and address of each individual to whom a door prize, regular or special Bingo game prize or jackpot from the playing of Bingo is awarded? d. A complete and itemized record of all receipts and disburse- ments which support, and that agree with, the quarterly and annual reports required to be filed, and that these records must be maintained in reasonable order to permit audit?_,_ 22. Does your organization be conducted at such time as and only at such locations this application? 23. Does your organization understand that the gross receipts in the course of a reporting year from the playing of instant Bingo may not exceed 33 1/3$ of the gross receipts of an organization's Bingo operation? 24. Does your organization understand it may not sell an instant Bingo card to an individual below sixteen years of age? 25. Does your organization understand that an organization whose gross receipts from all bingo operations that exceed or are ex- pected to exceed $75,000 in any calendar year shall have been granted tax-exempt status pursuant to Section 501 C of the United States Internal Revenue Service? (Certificate must be attached.) understand that instant Bingo may only regular Bingo game is in progress, and at such times as are specified in 7 26. Does your organization understand that a Certificate of Occu- pancy must be obtained or be on file which authorizes this use at the proposed location? 27. Does your organization understand that awards or prize money or merchandise valued in excess of the following amounts are illegal? 1~~-'.~ a. No door prize shall exceed twenty-five dollars. b. No regular Bingo or special Bingo game shall exceed One Hund- red dollars. c. No jackpot of any nature whatsoever shall exceed One Thousand Dollars, nor shall the total amount of jackpot prizes awarded in any one calendar day exceed One Thousand Dollars. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * NOTARIZATION: THE FOLLOWING OATH MUST BE TAKEN BY ALL APPLICANTS I hereby swear or affirm under the penalties of perjury as set forth in 518.2 of the Code of Virginia, that all of the above statements are true to the best of my knowledge, information, and beliefs. All questions have been answered. Signed by: ~J Name //~ Title ~' Home Address Subscribed and sworn before me, this day of 19 My commission expires: 19 Notary Public RETURN THIS COMPLETED APPLICATION T0: COMMISSIONER OF THE REVENUE P.O. Box 20409 Roanoke, VA 24018-0513 8 BYLAWS Penn Forest Elementary School PTA *ARTICLE I - NAME The name of this association is the Penn Forest Elementary School Parent-Teachers Association (PTA), Roanoke County. It is a local PTA unit organized under the authority of the Virginia Congress of Parents and Teachers (the State PTA), a branch of the National Congress of Parents and Teachers (the National PTA). *ARTICLE II - PURPOSES , Section 1. The Objects of the association, in common with the Objects of the National 'PT'A,' are: ' a. To promote the welfare~of children and youth in home, school, community and place of worship. b. To raise the standards of home life. c. To secure adequate laws for the care and protection of .children and youth. d. To bring into closer relation the home and the school, that• parents and teachers may cooperate intelligently in the education of children and youth. e. To develop between educators and the general public such united efforts as will secure for all children and youth the highest advantages in physical, mental, social and spiritual education. Section 2. The Objects of this association are promoted in cooperation with the State PTA and the National PTA, through an educational program directed towards parents, teachers and the general public; are developed through conferences, committees, projects and programs; and are governed and qualified by the basic policies set forth in Article III. *ARTICLE III - BASIC POLICIES The following are basic policies of this association. a. The association shall be noncommercial, nonsectarian and nonpartisan. b. The name of the association or the names of any members in their official capacities shall not be used in any connection with a commercial concern or with any partisan interest or for any purpose not appropriately related to promotion of the Objects of the association. - 1 - • 'r c. The association shall not--directly or indirectly--participate or intervene (in any way, including the publishing or distributing of statements) in any political campaign on • behalf of, or in opposition to, any candidate for public office; or devote more than an insubstantial part of its activities to attempting to influence legislation by propaganda or otherwise. d. The association shall wo'rlt with t}~e schools to provide quality education for all children and yout}~, and shall seek to participate in the decision-malting process establishing school policy, recognizing that the legal responsibility to matte decisions has been delegated by the people ~o boards of education. • e. The association may cooperate with other organizations and agencies concerned with child welfare, but persons representing the~associ•atiori in such matters shall make no commitments that bind the association. f. In the event of the dissolution of the association, its assets shall be distributed for one or more exempt purposes specified in Section 501 (C) (3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, as from time to time amended. • *ARTICLE IV - ARTICLES OF ORGANIZATION .. The association exists as an unincorporated association of its • members. Its "Articles of Organization" comprise these bylaws, as from time to time amended. *ARTICLE V -~~ MEMBERS}iIP AND DUES Section 1. Membership in this I-'TA shall be made individual who subscribes to the Objects and the the National PTA, without regard to race, color, national origin, under such rules and regulation with the provisions of these bylaws of the State of the National PTA. available to any basic policies of creed, or s not in conflict PTA or the bylaws Section 2. Only members of the association shall be eligible to participate in the business meetings, or to serve in any of its elective or appointive positions. Section 3. Every individual who is a member of the PTA is, by virtue of the fact, a member of t}~e National PTA and the State PTA by which this local PTA is chartered; and is entitled to all benefits of such membership. Section 4. The association shall conduct an annual enrollment of members, but persons may be admitted to membership any time. Section 5. Each member of the association shall pay annual dues of $2.00 to the association. Such annual dues include the portion - 2 - of 5p~ per member payable to the State PTA, and the portion of 50 ~ per member payable to the National PTA. Section 6. The'State and National PTA portions of the dues paid by each member to a local PTA shall be set aside by the local PTA and remitted to the treasurer of the State PTA at the State Office on or before December 1; by March 1 of each year for those members received after December 1; and by June 30 for additional members received of ter March 1. The remittance to the State PTA shall be accompanied by a local remittance blank showing the name and address of the president of the association, the amount of the dues collected during the period covered by the report and the number of members of the association. ARTICLE VI - OFFICERS AND THEIR ELECTION a. The elected officers of this association shall be a president, three vice-presidents, a secretary, and a treasurer. These officers shall be elected annually by the general membership in the rrronth of March to t:nlce office June 1 of that same year: No officer shall serve more than 1:wo consecutive terms in the same office, with the exceF~tion of tl~e third vice-president, who is the principal of the school. A person who has served in an office for more t}~ari one-half (1/2) of a full term shall be deemed to have served a full term in such office. The •elected term shall be June 1 through the following May 31. b. Nominations for officers shall be made by a nominating . committee of five members, two of who shall be appointed by the executive board and three elected by the association at least two months prior to the election of officers. The chairman of this committee shall be so designated by the president. The nominating committee shall report to the general membership at least one month prior to the March meeting the name of at least one candidate for each office to be filled. Candidates for president shall have served at least one year on the executive board. In the event'of copresidents one of the two must have served at least one year on the board. T}~e consent of each candidate must be obtained before his/her name is placed in nomination. Additional nominations may be made from the floor at the March meeting of the association. A vacancy occurring in an office shall be filled by appointment of the president and by two-thirds (2/3) approval of the executive board. The first vice-president shall ascend to the office of president in the event of a vacancy in that office. ARTICLE VII - DUTIES OF OFFICERS a. President - Shall preside at all meetings of the association and executive board; shall be a member ex-officio of all committees except the nominating committee; shall coordinate the work of officers; shall perform any other duties pertaining to the office. - 3 - -- -- - - ~........r~........rw -S . 'r b. First Vice-President - Shall preside in the absence of the president; and shall be in charge of programs. ' c. Second Vice-President - Shall be in charge of membership. ~ d. Third Vice-President - Shall• be the principal of Penn Forest Elementary School. e. Secretary - Shall keep a correct record of all meetings of the association and the executive board; and shall handle all official correspondence affecting the association and executive board. f. Treasurer - Shall have cu3t:ocly of all of the funds of the association; shall keep a full and accurate account of receipts and expenditures; and shall make disbursements in accordance with the approved budget, as authorized by the association, the executive board, c~,r a special committee. The treasurer shall present•a financial statement at every meeting of the association and at other times when requested by the executive board and shall ma}ce a full report at the annual meeting. The treasurer shall be responsible for the maintenance of such books of account and records as conform to the requirements of Article XII, Section 3, of the bylaws. The treasurer's accounts shall be examined annually by the auditing committee of not less t1~an three members, who satisfied that the treasurer's annual report is correct, shall sign a statement of that fact at the end of the report. The auditing committee shall be appointed by the executive board at least two weeks before the annual meeting. All officers shall deliver to their successors no later than May 15 of each year all official mater~.al of the office including their procedure books. All officers, in addition to the basic duties described above, shall appoint chairmen of standing committees indicated below, and shall coordinate the efforts of those committees. Chairmen of standing committees in turn shall appoint and oversee the chairmen of certain subcommittees. Officer Standing Committees Subcommittees First Vice-President Second Vice-President Programs Cultural Arts Ways & Means Membership Legislation Publications Mayor Fund Raising Other Fund Raising Directory Editor Penn & Ink - 4 - _.. • .. S ..__.. t Officer Standing Committees Third Vice-•President Nealtt~ & Safety Teacher Representative ~ Volunteers. Coordination Secretary Subcommittees Enrichment Library Room Mothers Reading Guidance Special Education Grounds Beautification ~fiospitality Treasurer ARTICLE VIII - EXECUTIVE BOARD a. The executive board shall consist of the elected officers, the chairmen of standing committees indicated above, and the county council representative appointed by the president in accordance with Article XI herein. The president will appoint an ex-officio parliamentarian subject to majority approval of the executive board. The immediate past-president will serve as an ex-officio consultant to the president, but will•not be limited to that position should Ise/she desire to serve in another capacity in the organization. All executive board members except the parliamentarian and past-president shall have an equal vote in all matters brought before the board. The president shall vote only in the case of a tie. • b. The duties of the executive board shall be to transact necessary business in the intervals between association meetings and such other business as may be charged to it by the association; to approve the plans of work of the standing and sub-committees; to appoint an auditing committee to examine annually the treasurer's accounts; to prepare and submit to the association for approval a budget for the fiscal year; and to approve routine bills within the limits of the budget. c. Regular meetings of the executive board shall be held during the •school year, the time and place to be fixed by the board as the year progresses. A majority shall constitute a quorum. Any member of the executive board who is absent from three consecutive committee meetings shall be replaced by the president, the replacement requiring a three-quarters (3/4) vote of approval of the remaining members of the board. Special meetings of the executive board may be called by the president or by a majority of the members of the board. Officers shall-inform the president at least one week prior to any executive board meeting of reports or other topics for the agenda. - 5 - 1 ,, •~, ~ c. n, ••-1 a~ ~ ~ ~ o cv ~ x +~ N C ~ [~ to ~ 1 O C ~ +~ ~ O cU ~ O cd U • ~ CS ~A W cb a~ C to ,-a p U cti •ri N •rl •1-~ fn ~ U cd c., 1 N U Al fq n. ~ N C t/) b -I ~ •~ I Ctl tr ro n c. c ~ ,~ H O O. •.-1 ~ W a •N ~• U ~ ~ cd C~ d O 't7 H H N H ~ z :° ~ ~ w w ~ ~ ~ v a a a, .n n. 1 H ~ U d1 fn ~ Q. Q LY d0 a a v H •~+ a a •~ ~ ~ ro > +~ +~ a, r+ n) cc ~ m ~ x (~ I ( K1 ~ [A ~ H tN. [W O B QI n. O JC Q to O ~ ~ .~ O >, a ~ w .-, .-~ c. c. s~ a U U •~+ m a, alb ~ •a c~ w ,n w ~ ~ o ~ ca ,a c, ao-1~ ,~ a a~ c~ ~ H 1 ~.7 ~--~ O U U p ~ •r-1 I .C p > t.. U U b .1] GL L.. }., O ~ •.~ AO C H N 41 .C C~ >~ (s] 'O U ~~ C N .d •,~ UJ c. Q. 1 4) U •r-1 N r rn N ~ sr ~, cd cd N Rf !.. fA ~~ ~ 4 r-1 Q U N E cU L 110 O [.. (1. .C C ~ ~ O •'-1 O tz~ R) L7: hQ c.. C O 't7 ••-~ 'n C V) cd ~ •r-1 Efr,cti !x ARTICLE IX - STANDING COMMITTEES a. The standing committee shall consist of those committees shown in Article VTI. Each committee chairman shall bb appointed by the officer under whom the, committee functions, and each ' appointee must be approved }~y majority vote of the elected officers. Creation or dissolution of any standing committee will require a three-four~th^ (3/~) vote of the elected officers. b. The duties of t}re standing comrnittees~ shall be to perform all necessary work to attain the objectives of the association. Committee chairmen shall submit to t}~e executive board a tentative plan of work for approval, and no'committee work shall be undertaken without the consent of the board. Each committee chairman shall submit a budget request for his/her committee to be approved by two-thirds (2/3) vote of the executive board before October and by majority vote of the association at the October regular meeting. Year-to-date expenditures of each committee shall not exceed 110 of that committees submitted budget without majority approval of the executive board. ARTICLE X - SUBCOMMITTEES Subcommittees shall exist to carry out the duties and responsibilities of standing committees. Chairmen of these committees shall be appointed by the chairmen of standing committees and approved by majority vote of the standing committee members. By reason of precedence, subcommittees are to be organized as shown in Article VII. Creation or dissolution of subcommittees shall require a majority vote of the executive board. ARTICLE XI - MEETINGS a. Regular meetings of this association shall be held the second Tuesday of the following months: September, October, December, March, April, May, unless otherwise provided by the association or by the executive committee. b. Fifty members shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of business in any meeting of this association. c. The privilege of holding office, introducing motions, debating, and voting shall be limited to members of the association whose .current dues are paid. d. The electicn meeting shall be in ~A-p~~. I'~a:-~h e. Regular scheduled meeting may be changed and special meetings may be called by the executive committee at any time. - 6 - ARTICLE XII - COUtJCIL MEMBERSHIP Section 1. Selection of delegates a. The association shall be represented in meetings. of the ~ Roanoke County Council of Parent-Teacher Associations by the president or his/her alternate, the principal, or his/her alternate and by two delegates or their alternates. b. Delegates and their alternate^ shrill be appointed in April. c. Delegates to 'the Roanoke County Council of PTA's shall serve for a term of one year. Section 2. This association shall pay annual dues of $10.00 to the Roanoke County Council of PTA's, as provided in the council bylaws. Section 3. Responsibilities of delegates . a. Delegates shall report activities of the council to the local unit and shall present to the council such matters as may be referred to it by the local unit. b. Delegates shall vote.as instructed on adoption of projects or .on matters of policy, but shall use their own discretion on other matters except as provided by council bylaws. '- ~~ARTICLE XIII - RELATIONSHIP WITH NATIONAL PTA AND THE STATE PTA Section 1. This association is a constituent organization of the National PTA. It is organized and charted trader the authority of the State PTA, which in turn is enabled to do so under the bylaws of the National PTA. Section 2. The bylaws of this association are subject to the approval of the State PTA, and may not conflict with the bylaws of the National PTA and the bylaws of ttre State PTA. Any provision of the bylaws of this association that conflicts with the bylaws of the National PTA or the bylaws of the State PTA shall be null and void. Section 3. The association shall keep such permanent books of account and records as shall be sufficient to establish the items of gross income, receipts and disbursements of the association, including, specifically, the number of its members, the dues collected from its members, and the amount of dues remitted to the State PTA. Such books of account and records shall at all reasonable times be open to inspection by an authorized representative of the State PTA, or, where directed by the committee or state and national relationships, by a duly authorized representative of the National PTA. Section 4. The status of this association as a local PTA shall be subject to termination and its charter as a local PTA shall be - 7 - designated by the State PTA; or to another local PTA organized under the authority of the State PTA; and shall cease and t3esist from the further, use of any name that implies or connotes association with the National P'rA or the State PTA or status as a constituent organization of the National PTA. *ARTICLC XV - PARLIAMCN'rARY AUTFfORITY Robert's Rules of Order Newly Revised shall govern the association in all cases in which they are applicable and in which they are not in conflict with these bylnw:~ and those of the State PTA and the National P'rA or the articles of incorporration. ~'AR'rICLL XVI - AMINUML:N'1'S ' Section 1. Procedure for amendment of bylaws a. These bylaws may be amenc9ed rat any regular meeting of the association by a two-thirds vote of the members present and voting, provided that notice of the proposed amendment shall have been given at the previous meeting and t}~at the amendment shall be subject to approval of the State PTA. b. A committee may be appointed to submit a revised set of bylaws as a substitute for the existing bylaws by a majority vote at -a meeting of the association, or by a two-thirds vote of the executive committee. The requirements for adoption of a revised set of~bylaws shall be the same as in the case of an amendment. c. Submission of amendments or revised bylaws for approval by the State PTA shall be in accordance with the bylaws or regulations of the State P'rA. Section 2. Required provision and amendments The association shall include in its bylaws provisions corresponding to the provision of the bylaws of the National PTA that are identified therein by a double star. The adoption by the National PTA of an amendment to any of the "double starred" provisions of its bylaws shall serve automatically and without the requirement of further action by the association to amend correspondingly the bylaws of the association. Notwithstanding the automatic character of the amending process, the association shall take action promptly to incorporate such amendment in its bylaws. PARTICLE XVII - APPROVAL OF BYLAWS The bylaws of this association shall he submitted to the State Office for approval, on behalf of the Board of Managers by the Virginia PTA Committee on Bylaws, or its designee, every five years. - 9 - _.- - :-- . * ARTICL}. XVIII - FISCJ~L YIsAR The L-iscal ,year. of: this. ~-issooiaL-i.ort shall Uedin .Tune 1 and enc3 ~ 1`9ay 31. ~ . NO'1'1;: Laelt P1'n unit- i~a rc~c}u1.r:oc] t~ i.ncluc]e in its byl.tw~ the zrticles mc3rkec] with a st~~t~ (*) . '.['hc~ wot-c3inc} nt these articles must be nx.-tot].y a , ,hown het-e a~tc] no trc]c]i I~i.ort;3 may Uc made without, the approval cif the Si.aL-c 13ylaw:~ c.onnnittee. ~ J 1 ~ ACTION N0. A-82289-8 ITEM NUMBER- AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: August 22, 1989 AGENDA ITEM: Request for approval of a Raffle Permit from the Loyal Ordier of Moose Lodge No. 284 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Loyal Order of the Moose Lodge No. 284 has requested a Raffle Permit to hold a raffle on October 22, 1989. This application has been reviewed by the Commissioner of Revenue and he recommends that it be approved. The organization has paid the $25.00 fee. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the application for a Raffle Permit be approved. SUBMITTED BY: Mary H. Allen Clerk to the Board APPROVED BY: 1' /j Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved (X) Motion by• Bob L. Johnson/Harry Yes No Abstair. Denied ( ) C. Nickens Garrett x Received ( ) Johnson x Referred McGraw x To: Nickens x Robers x cc: File Bingo/Raffle File ~ RpANpk~ ~ ~OANp~F' L ~• ~ , ~ ~ ti !- ~ Z '~ Z ~ `b? COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 2 d rasa COMMISSIONER OF THE REVENUE teas APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO CONDUCT RAFFLES OR BINGO Application is hereby made for a bingo game or raffle permit. This application is made sub~iect to all County and State laws, ordinances, rules, and regulations now in force, or that may be enacted hereafter and which are hereby agreed to by the under- signed applicant and which shall be deemed a condition under which this permit is issued. Al l uppl ica:^.ts shcu? d e==°rc'-se ?} treTne care to •~nsure the accura- cy of their responses to the following questions. Bingo games and raffles are strictly regulated by Title 18.2-340.1 et. sec. of the criminal statutes of the Virginia Code, and by Section 4-86 et. sew. of the Roanoke County Code. These laws authorize the County Board of Supervisors to conduct a reasonable investiga- tion prior to granting a bingo or raffle permit. The Board has sixty days from the filing of an application to grant or deny the permit. The Board may deny, suspend, or revoke the permit of any organization found not to be in strict compliance with county and state law. Any person violating county or state regulations concerning these permits shall be guilty of a Class 1 misdemeanor. Any person who uses any part of the gross receipts from bingo or raffles for any purpose other than the lawful religious, charitable, community, or educational purposes for which the organization is specifi- cally.organized, except for reasonable operating expenses, shall be guilty of a Class 6 felony. THIS APPLICATION IS FOR: (check one) RAFFLE PERMIT X BINGO GAMES Name of Organization Loyal Order of Moose Lodge P1o. 284 Street Address 3`'33 Catawba Valley Drive, Salen, Vir€;inia <<+153__ Mailing Address P. 0. Bow 538 City, State, Zip Code Salem, Virginia 2~+153 Purpose and Type of Organization Fratern•+1 or~Tanization When was the organization founded? 1915 1 .~ - / I Roanoke County meeting place? Yes - Moose home - 3233 Catawba Valley Drive Has organization been in existence in Roanoke County for two con- tinuous years? YES X NO ' Is the organization non-profit? YES X NO Indicate Federal Identification Number # 54-0287492 Attach copy of IRS Tax Exemption letter. Officers of the Organization: President: Norman S. Pleasanton Vice-President Address : 2407 Laura Road P1W Address Roanoke, Va. 24017 Clarence E. Davidson 1759 Pomeroy Road Salem, Va. 24153 Jr. Past Gov. gec-tetary: Larry M. Conner Treasurer: John E. Wade Address : 4970 Bradshaw Road Salem, Va. 24153 Address: 7104 Woods Crossing Drive SW P.oanoke, Va. 24014 Member authorized to be responsible for Raffle or Bingo opera= tions: Name ,f,f a'fy I ~ F'~., ~ ~~~~~ Home Address ~~.~tf ~°ff <i,~~ ~r; ~~~ ~~ J'`~,,--, .~-~`,~ ./~'~~, ~j~,~ .~./~~5 ~, ~ ~J Phone ~'~ `~i~ ~ /' ` Bus . Phone i'' `~ = r`~ ~ ~..~/- ~ ,~~~,~. A COMPLETE LIFT OF THE NRMES AND ADDRESSES OF CURRENT MEMBER- SHIP MUST BE FLRNIS1iED WITH THIS APPLICATION. Specific location where Raffle or Bingo Game is to be conducted. , Moose home - 3233 Catawba Valley Drive, Saleri, Va, 24153 (P,t. 311 PTorth) RAFFLES: Date of Drawing Oct. 22, 1989 Time of Drawing PP1 BINGO: Days of Week & Hours of Activity: Sunday From To Monday From To Tuesday From To Wednesday From To Thursd~-~y From To Friday From To Saturday From To 2 ~~- / State specifically how the proceeds from the Bingo/Raffle will be used. List in detail the use of the planned or intended use of the proceeds. Use estimated amounts if necessary. To promote welfare and enhance education of our children and youth. To promote civic and educational welfare of our community. ~-- o NOT VALID UNLESS COUNTERSIGNED The above application, having been found in due form, is approved and issued to the applicant to :nave effect until December 31st of this calendar year. Date ~Com issione of the Revenue The above application is not approved. Date Commissioner of the Revenue 8 -1- - / BINGO: Complete the following: Legal owner(s) of the building where BINGO is to be conducted: Name: Address: County State Zip Is the building owned by a 501-C non-profit organization? Seating capacity for each location: Parking spaces for each location: ALL RAFFLE AND BINGO APPLICANTS MUST ANSWER QUESTIONS 1 - 19 1. Gross receipts from all sources related to the operation of Bingo games or Instant Bingo by calendar quarter for prior calen- dar year period. BINGO INSTANT BINGO 1st Quarter 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter Total 1st Quarter 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter Total 2. Does your organization understand that it is a violation of law to enter into a contract with any person or firm, associa- tion; organization, partnership, or corporation nf_ any c].assif_ica- tion whatsoever, for the purpose of organizing, managing, or con- ducting Bingo Games or Raffles? Yes 3. Does your organization understand that it must maintain and file complete records of receipts and disbursements pertaining to Bingo games and Raffles, and that such records are subject to audit by the Commissioner of the Revenue? Yes 4. Does your organization understand that the Commissioner of the Revenue or his designee has the right to go upon the premises on which any organization is conducting a Bingo game or raffle, to perform unannounced audits, and to secure for audit all re- cords required to be maintained for Bingo games or raffles? Yes 3 ~- i 5. Does your organization understand that a Financial Report must be filed witti the Commissioner of the Revenue on or before the first day of November of each calendar year for which a per- mit has been issued? Yes 6. Does your organization understand that if gross receipts ex- ceed fifty thousanu dollars during any calendar quarter, an addi- tional Financial Report must be filed for such quarter no later than sixty day.> fo?lowing the last day of such quarter? Yes 7. Does your organ~_za~_ion understand that the failure to file financial reporus when due shall cause automatic revocation of the permit, and no such organization shall conduct any Bingo game or raffle thereafter until such report is properly filed and a new permit is obtained? Yes 8. Does your organization understand that each Financial Report must be accompanied by a Certificate, verified under oath by the Board of Directors, that the proceeds of any Bingo game or raffle have been used for these lawful, religious, charitable, commu- nity, or educational purposes for which the organization is spe- cifically chartered or organized, and that the operation of Bingo games or raffles have been in accordance with the provisions of Article 1.1 of Chapter 8, Title 18.2 of the Code of Virginia? Yes 9. Does your organization understand that a one percent audit fee of the gross receipts must be paid to the County of Roanoke upon submission of the annual financial report due on or before the first of November? Yes 10. Does your organization understand that this permit is valid only in the County of Roanoke and only at such locations, and for such dates, as are designated in the permit application? Yes 11. Does your organization understand that no person, except a bona fide member of ar_y such organization who shall have been a member of such organization for at least ninety days prior to such partic?.patio'~r shall partir_.ipate in the management, opera- tion, or conduct of any bingo game or raffle, and no person shall receive any remuneration for participating in management, operation, or conduct of any such game or raffle? Yes 12. Has your organization attached a check for the annual permit fee in the amount of $25.00 payable to the County of Roanoke, Virginia? Yes 13. Does your organization understand that any organization found in violation of the County Bingo and Raffle Ordinance or §18.2- 340.10 of the Code of Virginia authorizing this permit is subject to having such permit revoked and any person, shareholder, agent, member or employee of such organization who violates the above to having such permit revoked and any person, shareholder, agent, member or employee of such organization who violates the above referenced Codes may be guilty of a felony? Yes 4 Z -- 14. Has your organization attached a complete list of its member- ship to this application form? Officers Only 15. Has your organization attached a copy of its bylaws to this application form? 16. Has the organization been declared exempt from property taxa- tion under the Virginia Constitution or statutes? Yes If yes, state whether exemption is for real, personal property, or both and identify exempt property. Real Estate 3233 Catawba Valley Drive, Saleri, Va. 17. State the specific type Ord purpose of *..he organization. Non-Profit Fraternal - Charitable 18. Is this organization incorporated in Virginia? Yes If yes, name ar.d address of Registered Agent: Norman S. Pleasanton,_Governor 2407 Laura Road PdW Roanoke, Va. 24017 19. Is the organization registered with the Virginia Department ' of Agriculture and Consumer Affairs pursuant to the Charitable Solicitations Act, Section 57-48 of the Virginia Code? Pd° (If so, attach copy of r~~~istration.) Has the organization been granted an exemption from registration by the Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Affairs? No (If so, attach copy of exemption.) ALL RAFFLE APPLICANTS DESCRIBE THE ARTICLES TO BE RAFFLED, VALUE OF SUCH ARTICLES, AND PROCEED TO NOTARIZATION. Article Description Fair Market Value Cash $100.00 Cash $ 75.00 Cash $ 50.00 5 .~. -~ f ALL BINGO APPLICANTS MUST ANSWER QUESTIONS 20 - 27 BEFORE NOTARIZATION RAFFLE APPLICANTS, GO TO NOTARIZATION. 20. Does your organization understand that the bingo games shall not be conducted more frequently than two calendar days in any calendar week? 21. Does your organization understand that it is required to keep complete records of the bingo game. These records based on §18.2- 340.6 of the Code of Virginia and X4.98 of Roanoke County Code must include the following: a. A record Cf the date, quantity, and card value of instant bingo supplies purchased, as well as the name and address of the supplier of such instant bingo supplies, and written invoice or receipt is also required for each purchase of in- stant bingo supplies? b. A record in writing of the dates on which Bingo is played, the number off: people in attendance on each date, and the amount of receipts and prizes on each day? (These Yecords must be retained for three years.) c. A record of the name and address of each individual to whom a door prize, regular or special Bingo game prize or jackpot from the playing of Bingo is awarded? d. A complete and itemized record of all receipts and disburse- ments which support, and that agree with, the quarterly and annual reports required to be filed, and that these records must be maintained in reasonable order to permit audit? 22. Does your organiza*_ion be conducted at such time as and only at such locations this application? _ 23. Does your organization understand that the gross receipts in the 'course of a reporting year from the playing of instant Bingo may not exceed 33 1/3~ of the gross receipts of an organization's Bingo operation? 24. Does your organization understand it may not sell an instant Bingo card to an individual below sixteen years of age? 25. Does your organization understand that an organization whose gross receipts from all bingo .operations that exceed or are ex- pected to exceed $75,000 in any calendar year shall have been granted tax-exempt status pursuant to Section 501 C of the United States Internal :^evenue Service? (Certificate must be attached.) understand that instant Bingo may only regular Bingo game is in .progress, and at such times as are specified in 6 26. Does your organization understand that a Certificate of Occu- pancy must be obtained or be on file which authorizes this use at the proposed location? 27. Does your organization understand that awards or prize money or merchandise valued in excess of the following amounts are illegal? a. No door prize shall exceed twenty-five dollars. b. No regular Bingo or special Bingo game shall exceed One Hund- red dollars. c. No jackpot of any nature whatsoever. shall .exceed One Thousand Dollars, n~~r shall the to}~xi amount of jackr7ot prizes awarded in any one calendar day exceed One Thousand Dollars. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * NOTARIZATION: THE FOLLOWING OATH MUST BE TAKEN BY ALL APPLICANTS I hereby swear or aff: forth in X18.2 of the statements are true to beliefs. All questions Signed by: ----~ ^~ r ~. ~'Z~J Z~L ~'I ~~ ?..f` " ` ~Gi'Cs ~ti~ Name Lrm under the penalties of perjury as set Code of Virginia, that all of the above the best of my knowledge, information, and have been answered. Title Ho e Address Subscribed and sworn before me, this day of 19 My commission expires: 19 Notary Public RETURN THIS COMPLETED APPLICATION T0: COMMISSIONER OF THE REVENUE P.O. Box 3900 Roanoke, VA 24015 7 ACTION NO. ITEM NO . ~1 ~ -' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: August 22, 1989 AGENDA ITEM: First Reading Rezoning Ordinances Consent Agenda COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND• The County has received two rezoning applications. The first reading on these ordinances is scheduled for August 22, 1989. The second reading and public hearing on these ordinances is scheduled for September 26, 1989. The titles of the rezoning ordinances are as follows: 1. An ordinance to change the zoning classification of a .409 acre tract of real estate located at 5449 Franklin Road (Tax Map No. 98.02-2-9) in the Cave Spring Magis- terial District from the zoning classification of B2 to the zoning classification of B3 with conditions and a special exception upon the application of Eagle Equipment Company. 2. An ordinance to change the zoning classification of a .493-acre tract of real estate locate northwest of the intersection of Peters Creek Road and Valleypointe Parkway in the Hollins Magisterial District from the zoning classification of A-1 to the zoning classification of M-1 with conditions and a special exception upon the application of Lingerfelt Development Corporation. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board approve and adopt the first reading of these rezoning ordinance and schedule the second reading and public hearing for September 26, 1989. ~ ~ - .Z Respectfully submitted, "~'Yt . ~V`~'~ Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney Action Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by Garrett Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers vole No Yes Abs ACTION NUMBER ITEM NUMBER ~ "` AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CEN`FER MEETING DATE: August 22, 1989 AGENDA ITEM: Accounts Paid - July 1989 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S CON~I'S: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Payments to Vendors: $2,813,722.41 Payroll: 7/7/89 $382,585.42 7/21/89 404,563.93 797,723.62 53,611,446.03 A detailed listing of the payments is on file with the Clerk to the Board of Supervisors. SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: ~ ~. ~~ Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance Approved ( ) Notion by: Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ACTION Elmer C. Hodge ~' County Administrator VOTE No Yes Abs Garrett Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers ,~'" COUI~TI'Y OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA UNAPPROPRIATED BALANCE - CAPITAL FUND Beginning Balance at July 1, 1989 $56,194 Balance as of August 22, 1989 56 194 Sunni tted by ~~ ~. ~ Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance L. --. COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA UNAPPROPRIATID BALANCE - GENERAL FUND Balance at July 1, 1989 (Unaudited) $2,012,318 Balance as of August 22, 1989 $2,012,318 Su}xnitted by Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance L--~ COUN'T'Y OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA RESERVE FOR BOARD CONTINGENCY Beginning Balance at July 1, 1989 $11,394 Additional Amount from 1989-90 Budget 50,000 June 14, 1989 Contribution to Va. Amateur Sports (25,000) July 11, 1989 Purchase of drainage easement (5,000) July 11, 1989 Option on 200 acres real estate (3,750) July 25, 1989 Donation to Julian Wise Foundation (5,000) August 8, 1989 County supplant for new position (869) in Sheriff's department Balance as of August 22, 1989 21 775 Submitted by ~ ~.a~ ~ . ~ Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance County staff requests the Board to adopt a motion to enter into executive session within the provisions of the Virginia Freedom of Information Act as follows: (a) to discuss a specific legal matter requiring the provision of legal advice by the County Attorney and briefings by staff members concerning Consolidation in accordance with Sections 2.1-344 A 7 and 15.1-945.7 D of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended. (b) to discuss probable litigation or other specific legal matters requiring the provision of legal advice by the County Attorney concerning the Sheriff in accordance with Section 2.1-344 A 7 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended. (c) to discuss actual litigation, Roanoke County v Crouse Enter rises Inc., in accordance with Section 2.1-344.A.7. of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended. (d) to discuss the acquisition of real property for public purposes for fire and rescue services in accordance with Section 2.1-344.A.3. of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended. (e) to discuss the disposition of publicly-held real estate for economic development purposes in accordance with Section 2.1-344.A.3. of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended. (f) to discuss the performance of the County Administrator and the County Attorney in accordance with Section 2.1- 344.A.1. of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended. ~'~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY , VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 22, 1989 RESOLUTION 82289-9 CERTIFYING EXECUTIVE MEETING WAS HELD IN CONFORMITY WITH THE CODE OF VIRGINIA WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia has convened an executive meeting on this date pursuant to an affirmative recorded vote and in accordance with the provisions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and WHEREAS, Section 2.1-344.1 of the Code of Virginia requires a certification by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia that such executive meeting were conducted in conformity with Virginia Law. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia hereby certifies that, to the best of each members knowledge: 1. Only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements by Virginia law were discussed in the executive meeting which this certification resolution applies, and 2. Only such public business matters as were identified in the motion convening the executive meeting were heard, discussed or considered by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. The Executive Session held during the afternoon session was certified on motion of Supervisor Robers, seconded by Supervisor Johnson, and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: ~- Mary H. len, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors CC: File Executive Session File i AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, AUGUST 22, 1989 RESOLUTION 82289-10 REQUESTING THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ROANOKE COUNTY TO ORDER AN ELECTION ON THE QUESTION OF ESTABLISHING A POLICE FORCE IN ROANOKE COUNTY WHEREAS, Section 15.1-131.6:1 of the Code of Virginia (1950), as amended, provides that a county which does not presently have a police force shall not establish one until the voters of such county have approved establishment of a police force by majority vote in a referendum held for such purpose; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the authority granted by the Code of Virginia, the Board proposes to call a special election to take the sense of the qualified voters of the County on the question of establishing a police force in Roanoke County. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the Board hereby petitions the Circuit Court of Roanoke County to order an election on November 7, 1989, on the question of establishing a police force in Roanoke County, provided that such date is at least sixty (60) days after the date on which the Court enters its order. The question on the ballot shall be in substantially the following form or such other form as may be approved by the Electoral Board of the County: Question: Shall a police force be established in Roanoke County? Yes No 2. That the Clerk of the Board is instructed to immediately file a certified copy of this resolution with the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia. 3. That the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, shall publish a notice of such election in a newspaper of general circulation in the County once a week for three consecutive weeks prior to such election. 4. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized and directed to take such actions as may be necessary to accomplish the intent of this resolution. 5. That this resolution shall take effect immediately. On motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by Supervisor Johnson, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisor Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: ~' ' / G~~ Mary H. len, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Paul Mahoney, County Attorney Elizabeth Stokes, Clerk, Roanoke County Circuit Court Elizabeth Leah, Registrar Sheriff Michael Kavanaugh Judge Kenneth E. Trabue, Roanoke County Circuit Court VIRQNIA: BEFC)RE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COU[~FI'Y A 5.43 acre parcel of land, ) generally located east side of US 220) approx. 4 mi. north of Franklin Co. line ) within the Cave Spring ) Magisterial District, and ) rn ~~ ~_\ H z w H 2 0 U O H Q W 0 a a a recorded as parcel # 114.00-1-68 ) in the Roanoke County Tax Records. ) FTATflT. f1RT1F:R ~ THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUt~t'Y: WHEREAS, your Petitioner Trinity Church did petition the Board of County Supervisors to rezone the above-referenced parcel from M-2, General Industrial District to B-1, Office District for the purpose of constructing a church building. WHEREAS, after due legal notice, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing of the petition on August 1, ~ 1g 89, at which time, all parties in interest were given an opportunity to be heard; and WHEREAS, after full consideration at the public hearing held on August 22, 19 89 the Board of County Supervisors determined that the rezoning be approved with proffers on August 22, 1989. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDERID that the aforementioned parcel of land, which is 114.00-1-68 and recorded contained in the Roanoke County Tax Maps as Parcel in Deed Book 1114 page 834 and legally described below, be rezoned from M-2, General Industrial District to B-1, Office District. - 8 - Legal Description of Property (Metes and Bounds): ~'8~'- Being 5.43 acres, lying Southeast of U. S. Route 220, East of Norfolk Southern Railway, and Northwest of State Secondary Route 958, one-fourth mile north of Franklin County, Virginia, in the Cave Spring District of Roanoke County, Virginia, according to a plat of survey made for Claude Eggleston by C. B. P~alcolm ~ Son, C. E. dated March 8, 1979, and recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, in Deed Book 1114, Page £~34. BE IT FURTHER ORDERID that a copy of this order be transmitted to the Secretary of the Planning Commission and that he be directed to reflect that change on the official zoning map of Roanoke County. ADOPTED on motion of Supervisor Nickens and upon the following recorded vote: Ate= Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett Np,YS: None ABSENT': None ~ / 1~ ~ , Clerk cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, De Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Inspections Terry Harrington, Director, Pl~n9ii~g John Willey, Director, Real Estate Assessment VIRGINIA: BEE~ORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF RQAI~KE COUl~I'Y A 5.43 acre parcel of land, ) generally located east side of VS 22G) approx. ai~~ile north of Franklin Co. ) within the Cave Sarin ) Magisterial District, and ) recorded as parcel ~ 1I4.00-1-6~3 ) o ) ~ in the Roanoke County Tax Records. ) PROFFER OF munrmrnt~ SF 9-/ ~ THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE OOUIal'Y: ~_> Being in accord with Sec. 15.1-491.1 et seq. of the Code of Virginia and Sec. H w 21-105E of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance, the Petitioner Trinity_ Church o hereby voluntarily proffers to the ~ Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia the following conditions to the 0 H rezoning of the above-referenced parcel of land: ~ 1. The use of the property tivill be limited to public ar,d nonprofit organization uses ~ such as schools, churches, and related uses. w ~. The entrance to the property shall be perr~itted only from ~`irginia Secondary Route ~ 953. a 3. N11 healthy rs~ature trees shall be maintained around the perimeter of the site, ~ except those necessary to be cut for the entrance to the site. 4. Signage shall be limited to one freestanding sign containing no more than lOG square feet, and no temporary or portable signs, or billboards shall be permitted. 5. Gutdoor lighting, except essential security lighting, shall be limited to parking lots, drives, pedestrian walks and the like, shall be no more than 1C, feet in height, designed with lighting levels established by the 'Jirginia Statev~;ide Guilding Code and/or IES, and shall be extinguished when facilities are not in use. ly sulxnitted, !~ Y tioner u aeon, Trinity Chure - 10 - [1 VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY A 6.14 acre parcel of land, ) generally located on the south ) side of Buck Mountain Road, S.W. ) within the Cave Spring Magisterial ) District, and recorded as a ) ~ portion of parcel #97.02-1-10 ) ~ in the Roanoke County Tax Records. w FINAL ORDER TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY: ~~~~ WHEREAS, your Petitioner LOBO Investors, a Virginia General `~`. Partnership, did petition the Board of County Supervisors to H rezone the above-reference parcel from R-5 (with conditions) 2 District to R-1 District for the purpose of constructing single 0 v family homes; 0 ~ WHEREAS, after due legal notice, the Planning Commission did o hold a public hearing of the petition on August 1, 1989, at whic w o time, all parties in interest were given an opportunity to be rx a heard; and WHEREAS, after full consideration at the public hearing held on August 22 1989, the Board of County Supervisors determined that the rezoning be changed from R-5 District (with conditions) to R-1 District, with conditions. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDERED that the aforementioned parcel of land, which is contained in the Roanoke County Tax Maps as a portion of Parcel 97.02-1-10 and recorded in Deed Book 1217 Page 483 and legally described below, be rezoned from R-5 (with conditions) District to R-1 District, with conditions. - 7 - Legal Description of Property (Metes and Bounds): ~ ~~ ./BEGINNING at a point on the southerly side of Buck Mountain Road, S.W. (Va Sec. Rte. 679), said point being cornera to 729 Prthence P g )~ of Grover Pate, Jr. and wife (Deed Book 956, S, 04° 30' leaving Buck Mountain Road and with the line of Pate, 00" W. 345.85 feet to a point on the line of Lot 59, Block 1, according to the plat of Section 4, The Oaks in Branderwood (Plat Book 11, page 90); thence with the same and with Lots 60 and 61, N. 74° 35' 55" W. 184.20 feet to a point; thence N. 70° 34' 02" W. 111.80 feet to a point; thence S. 12° 32' 00" W. 100.00 feet to a point on the northerly side of Branderwood Drive, S.W.; thence with the same, the following three courses and distances, a curved line to the right whose radius 250.00 feet, a chord bearing and distance of N. 75° 47' 28" W. 8.08 feet, an arc distance of 8.08 feet to a point; thence N. 76° 43' 00" W. 539.33 feet to a point; thence a curved line to the right whose radius is 278.85 feet, a chord bearing and distance of S. 72° 14' S9" E. 43.43 feet, an arc distance of 43.48 feet to a point on the line of 1tPOthenceawithrthe 1, Section 1, Branderwood (Plat Book 9, page 351); same N. 13° 17' 00" E. 29.84 feet to a point; thence a curved line to the right whose radius is 155.00 feet, a chord bearing and distance of S. 30° 46' 25" W. 93.17 feet, an arc distance of 94.63 feet to a point; thence N. 31° 29' 13" W. 96.77 feet to a point; thence N. 04 ° 47' 35" E. 65.00 feet to a psiwt. °thence swithethe side of the aforesaid Buck Mountain Road, oint; thence a curved same, S. 85° 12' 25" E. 255.50 feet to a p line to the left whose radius is 5759.58 feet, anca°~d distanceaof distance of S. 88 24 10 E. `642.18 feet, 642.51 feet to the PLACE OF BEGINNING, and c6n14in A g )6. lo4f acLobo as shown on "Plat showing property Investors...,' dated May 31, 1989, prepared by Lumsden Associates, P.C., Engineers - Surveyors - Planners, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof; and BEING a part of the same property conveyed unto Lobo Investorfrom Virginia general partnership, by deed dated January 30, 1985, William R. Whitman, Jr., et al, of record in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, in Deed Book 1217, page 483. BE IT FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this order be transmitted to the Secretary of the Planning Commission and that he be directed to reflect that change on the official zoning map of Roanoke County. ADOPTED on motion of Supervisor Johnson and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None None Clerk ABSENT: Roano a oun y oar o upervisors~ cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Dev: & Inspections Terry Harrington, Director, Plannins~g - John Willey, Director, Real Estate Assessment ~ ~'~ z rn r VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY A 6.14 acre parcel of land, ) generally located on the south ) side of Buck Mountain Road, S.W. ) within the Cave Spring Magisterial ) District, and recorded as a ) portion of parcel #97.02-1-10 ) in the Roanoke County Tax Records. ) PROFFER OF CONDITIONS TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY: ` ~.. H z w H Z O U O H ~C Q w O a a a Being in accord with Sec. 15.1-491.1 et seq. of the Code of Virginia and Sec. 21-105E of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance, the Petitioner LOBO Investors hereby voluntarily proffers to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia the following conditions to the rezoning of the above-referenced parcel of land: /. No driveways will enter individual dwellings from Buck Mountain Road ~~ ~^-~j'~ 6/ ,~ ,~cf,~,.,o=,;~ 6..~,ae~t.,~ ~.~~e~;~~~a,,~f,~r.,~ /~a.~..~~ Sr~~ ~~= a<.'j~H~~~l "s"°~5.~!F~ffJ~.~y"yr~f-; 4;u.~h,`r„(:wc~.l Ipr7•c4.;.i:t~~ ~.<~' Cc,~sf.e..e.f-=.f ~..+6 ~ke N:.: ~ ~ L ~f' cu~r-f 3 C?,d ~ ~ ~ ~.~`+I~..c „ ~J~'` e• p.R.r v-i'~~ ~r ~ C (/c%,.~ Etrl~IlM~f"~ ;.~ .t~~ // O ~ CA~J.~.~o~/e.~ h/!-Gi~'1 e~/i'k-!"/ii~'rf~J',/ /~6r~'ei~ {il/~ /~Dil~a/~~ GJ':/f Pi.' ffk' ~XiST~~!~ . ~,; ~h Respectfully submitted, i3~~"c1`2~:w :gin <~ vF~! Yr LOBO INVESTORS By : i ~" Counsel Jolly, Place, Fralin & Prillaman, P.C. W. Heywood Fralin 3912 Electric Road, S.W. Roanoke, Virginia 24018 - 9 - VIRQNIA: BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE CO(JL~Ti'Y U '~ ~ ~r A 19.30 acre parcel of land, ) generally located Larson and ) Tomaranne Lane ) within the Windsor Hills ) FINAL ORDER Magisterial District, and ) rn ~ recorded as parcel # 77.05 ) ~ 2-46&48 ) ao in the Roanoke County Tax Records. ) ~. .~, ~~ ~, TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY: H WHEREAS, your Petitioner H.D.C., Inc. z did petition the Board of County Supervisors to rezone the above-referenced parcel 0 v f rom R-6 District to R-3 District 0 ~' for the purpose Of constructing patio & single famil y homes. Q w WHEREAS, after due legal notice, the Planning Commission did hold a public a hearing of the petition on August 1 , 1989 , at which time, all parties ~ in interest were given an opportunity to be heard; and SEAS, after full consideration at the public hearing held on August 22, 19 89 , the Board of County Supervisors determined that the rezoning be approved with proffers on August 22, 1989. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDERID that the aforementioned parcel of land, which is contained in the Roanoke County Tax Maps as Parcel 77.05-2-46 & 48 and recorded in Deed Book 587 Page 623-55 and legally described below, be rezoned from R-6 Residential District to R-3 Residential District. - 8 - ~8~~~ Legal Description of Property (Metes and Bounds): Legal Description of Property BEGINNING at a point on the easterly side of Tomaranne Drive, said point being located S. 43° 45' E. 10.0 feet and S. 36° 10' 10" E. 41.66 feet from the southwesterly corner of Lot 30, Block 2, Section 1. Melody Acres (Plat Book 4, page 55); thence with the easterly side of Tomaranne Drive along the arc of a circle to the left whose radius is 157.89 feet and whose chord is N. 36° 10' 10" W. 41,66 feet, an arc distance of 41.78 leet to a point; thence N. 43° 45' W. 10 f'et to a point; thence N. 38° 07' E. 141.42 feet~to a pbint; thence N. 43° 45' W. 712.90 feet to a point marked by an old iron; thence N. 84° 46' E. 242.54 feet to a point marked by an old iron; thence N. 72° 46' E. 335.0 feet to a goint in the center of Greenview Road; thence S. 41 U5' E. 428.91 feet to a point marked by an old iron; thence S. 39° 37' E. 653.36 feet to a point; thence S. 77° 02' 30" E. 396.0 feet to a oint marked by an old iron; thence S. 62° 36' 30" E. 99.0 feet to a point on the boundary of Oak Grove Development Corporation; thence S. 3° 10' 30" W. 362.26 feet to a point; thence N. 76° 29' W. 480.0 feet to a point; thence N. 78° 17' W. 340.0 feet to a Point marked by an old iron; thence S. 87° 51' W. 110.93 feet to a point; being the South- east corner of Tract "B" on the Plat hereinafter refer-•ed to; thence with the easterly boundary of Tract "B" N. 5° 18' 25" W. 139.53 feet to a point, being the Southeast corner of Tract "A" on said P1aC; thence with the easterly boundary of Tract "A" N. 5° 18' 25" W. 334.69 feet to a point; thenr_e I~. 84° 47' 43" W. 217.34 feet to a point; thence S. 38° 07' W. 171.34 feet to the place of BEGI1~17ING, and containing 18.30 acres, and being desil;~iated as Tract "C" on the Plat of the Survey made for licrman F. Larson Estate by T. P. Parker and won, Engineers and Surveyors, dated December 1, 1914. BE IT FURTfiER ORDERED that a copy of this order be transmitted to the Secretary of the Planning Commission and that he be directed to reflect that change on the official zoning map of Roanoke County. and upon the ADOPTED on motion of Supervisor Garrett following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett [~YS: None ~~: None ABSTAIN: Supervisor Johnson-Absent from discussion because of financia interest ~ ~~ o~ , Clerk cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Dev. & Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Inspect_io~s_ Terry Harrington, Director, planning h W'l1e Director Real Estate Assessment Jo n i y, a, ~- _~ E+ .. z w H z 0 U O H Q w 0 a a a VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF RQAPUKE COiJNTY A 19.30 acre parcel of land, ) generally located Larson and ) Tomaranne Lane ) PROFFER within the Windsor Hills ) OF Magisterial District, and ) CONDITIONS recorded as parcel # 77.05-2-46 & 48 ) in the Roanoke County Tax Records. ) `IC) THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF RQANOKE CO[)[~FI'Y Being in accord with Sec. 15.1-491.1 et seq. of the Code of Virginia and Sec. HDC, Inc. 21-105E of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance, the Petitioner hereby voluntarily proffers to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia the following conditions to the rezoning of the above-referenced parcel of land: 1. Property to be developed in substantial conformit1989th site plan prepared by Lumsden & Associates, dated July 25, 2. Development will be comprised of single family detached residences only. e'S ~ °°. VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY A ,~ acre parcel of land, ) generally located 'S~~2o?.S ,t~A/2,~o2tvoov ) within the ~„q~f'~rj~),~j~ ) FINAL ORDER ~ Magisterial District, and ) ~ recorded as parcel # 7~ D D -/-/ 7 ) in the Roanoke County Tax Records. ) ~^~' TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY: H z w H 2 0 U 0 H Q w 0 x a a WHEREAS, your Petitioner 9~ ~~~T, ~e ~Q ~~i ~. _ did petition the Board of County Supervisors fora "Use Not Provided For" permit for the above-referenced parcel for the purpose of ~~/ ,gip ,~i2c°,c1k'~i~s'~ WHEREAS, after due legal notice, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing of the petition on ~avC-~~ht 1 19 £~ , at which time, all parties in interest were given an opportunity to be heard; and WHEREAS, after f~.ill consideration, the Board of County Supervisors determined on August 22 ~ 19 89 , that the "Use Not Provided For" permit be approved with proffers on August 22, 1989. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDERED that the afor~nentioned parcel of land, which is contained in the Roanoke County Tax Maps as Parcel 74.00-1-17 & 18 and recorded in Deed Book 1066 page 625 and legally described below, be issued a "Use Not Provided For" permit for the purpose of operating a bed and breakfast - 7 - Legal Description of Property (Metes and Bounds): a# • an t6o e0ollt siM et ~w~ei. !s •~~ ~.s~ ai tom`.. ado-~.i~ rata a#= l~fwao i. ~• 01' fl. !7. ~? liNe a 1=-lMr s+N Nlt= tireoa oft os ~t aM «ta tw ss ol.. s~.~. ~rel.1 oat~iNa t. ~ Mo. o! ~t tea 1~-iid~ eaAr•i la"e~-} still rtii- ~ ~ieoo f. ~~• S3'~ ale.~e a~ ~~ tYwM trtdt • ~. ~ X4.15 met to ~ is~* at • efaee• ~~ ~' Y. ioS. N !wt to ae ices filet t~wiN •. lo' !~'. Y. !i.!! a ae !rw w1I t~s Met- oil ~ Mo~ie~ lwto .~' a~i aatta~s.ia~ S.oe .eto. .eeo ae dot a ~ aN ~ ~ ! . 00 ~at~raet~~l a ~teee =wMay ee rts~iata !a sweo ~ ~ Flat ..o.M~.~- ~. 1 ioatiia N M ~ Net ti~a:rte ~ ~ toad aart Lam. ~gaN~e~~iiaa ~.r~rM-le; Maav~-trN ~ ertA, 1~ Q. M-~ Mttr A. Qooiwto. ~ ~~vlr,t~, i~s~ aa~ •ooki, tie ~"' ss ~`islt~s 0 ~ oa Cir t Cost Roa~v Covaty. s~aia• ,_ .. ~ .. t~ ~. ~ H ,~ l ~~' ~ BE IT N,URTHER ORDERED that a copy of this order be transmitted to the Secretary of the Planning Commission and that he be directed to reflect that change on the official zoning map of Roanoke County. ADOPTED on motion of Supervisor following recorded vote: McGraw and upon the AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS' None ABSENT: None c c : File ~~ ~~ J~'d • Q~~_ ,Clerk Arnold Covey, Director, DevInspect~~i~e County Board of Supervisors Terry Harrington, Director, Planning John Willey, Director, Real Estate Assessment ~ aq - ~/ VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUN`T'Y p, _~- acre parcel of land, ) generally located a,5' ,~A~26onin~oe ) QC~ 5p/,gym,. VA.. a~153 ) within the ~ ~} ~h1 ~~ /1 > ~, Magisterial District, and ) ~ recorded as parcel # z~od ' / -/7 > ~ An- o ~~ Dd - /'/8~ ) in the Roanoke County Tax Records. ) ''! ` \~, H 2 w H z 0 U 0 H Q w 0 a a a PROFFER OF rnNnTTTnNS TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUN'T'Y: Being in accord with Sec. 15.1-491.1 et seq. of the Code of Virginia and Sec. 21-105E of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance, the Petitioner ~~~bY ~ ~~`~~ ~ ~~ 1~~Q hereby voluntarily proffers to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia the following conditions to the "Use Not Provided For" permit of the above-referenced parcel of land: 1. The awner or owner's family shall reside on the premises occupied by the bed and breakfast. 2. No more than five guest sleeping rooms shall be utilized for any one bed and breakfast establishment. 3. Any building erected, enlarged or modified to accommodate a bed and breakfast shall maintain the appearance of a single family residence. No rooms shall have a direct entrance or exit to the outside of the building. 4. Guests may stay no more than 14 consecutive nights in any one calendar year. The operator of the bed and breakfast shall maintain a log of all guests, including their name, address, license plate number, and length of stay, and shall make the log available to staff upon request. 5. Meals shall be provided only to overnight guests and no cooking shall be permitted in guest roams. 6. Parking for guests and employees shall be provided on-site and shall not be located in unimproved yard areas. 7. The owner is responsible for canplying with all other local, state and federal licensing, taxing, health, fire and safety laws and regulations which may apply. 8. Sign will be of wood construction and no more than 3 ~ ~ ~~ ®~ 6 ~V o.r ~ ~ta~ Respect submitted i /// ,r~ ,~f r Peti ti - 9 - FINAL ORDER ~~ August 22, WHEREAS, after full consideration at the public hearing held on 19 89 the Board of County Supervisors determined that the amendment to the Future Land Use Guide of the Roanoke County Canprehensive Development Plan be a roved on Au ust 22, 1989. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDERID that the aforementioned parcel of land, which is contained in the Roanoke County Tax Maps as Parcel~~ 70.11-1-21, 22, 20 and recorded in Deed Book Page and legally described below,' be redesignated Rural Preserve t0 Principal Industrial f rcar- rn ~ Legal Description of Property: r See attached location map BE IT FURTHER ORDERID that a copy of this order be transmitted to the Secretary of the Planning Commission and that the Land Use Plan: Future Land Use Map be changed accordingly. ADOPTED on motion of Supervisor Johnson and upon the following recorded vote: AYE: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Garrett NAYS: Supervisor Nickens ABSENT:None cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Dev & ~~ , , Clerk Inspecti~8£noke Countyy Board of Supervisors John Willey, Director, Real Estate Assessi4lent Terry Harrington, Director, Plann}n~ - ~g~'% PETITIONER: CASE NtI~RBER: TRIDTITY cxvRCH 34-8/89 Planning Carmission Hearing Date: August 1, 1989 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: August 22, 1989 A. RD~UEST Petition of Trinity Church to rezone a 5.43 acre tract from M-2, Industrial to B-l, Business to construct a church, located along the east side of Route 220 at its intersection with Route 958 in the Cave Spring Magisterial District. B. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION There was no one present in opposition to the request. C. SIGNIFICANT IMPACT FAC'T'ORS None. D. PROFFERED CONDITIONS 1. The use of the property will be limited to public and nonprofit organization uses such as schools, churches, and related uses. 2. Entrance to the property shall be permitted only from VA 958. 3. All healthy mature trees shall be maintained around the perimeter of the site except those necessary to be cut for the entrance. 4. Signage shall be limited to one freestanding sign, no more than 100 sq.ft. No temporary or portable signs or billboards shall be permitted. 5. Outdoor lighting, except essential security lighting, shall be limited to parking lots, drives, pedestrian walks and the like, shall be no more than 16 feet in height, designed with lighting levels established by the VA Building Code and/or IES, and shall be extinguished when facilities are not in use. E. CON~'IISSIONER' S MO`T'ION, VO'T'E AND REASON Mr. Witt moved to approve the petition with proffered conditions. The motion carried with the following roll call vote: pyF$: Massey, Winstead, Gordon, Robinson, Witt NAYS: None ABSENT: None F. DISSENTING PERSPDCTIVE None. G. ATTACHNIETTrS X Concept Plan (8~" x 11") X Vicinity Map (8~" x 11") X Staff Report Other ( l/ Jo rtley, Alte to Secretary Roa oke County Planning Ccnunission •~ 1EETS AID lOfAIS aATA YAS TAKEN fN011 11RKT /NElAN~ qR CWAE E66LFS7011 6f • L NMICRJI a 7aL GATED IY~aul t. 1971. 2, ~O!/NY1R/ DATA (70Z•T W f0llfht 1 To 2 - i t,]"-t7' ~S" Y. , 392.2!' ! TD 1 - i li`-12' Y., 26.11' TO / - i2f'-SN'-30" r.. 11.21' 1 TO S - i2!'JS' Y.. If.l3' S TO 6 - i2a^JO' Y.. 17.3!' c TO 7 - i ];'-17' Y.. 17.0' 7 TO • - i1T'~/' Y., 95.3!' N TO ! - id-Jl'-10' Y., 17.37' ! To to - iSt'J6' r., 19.11 to ro it - is~,ll'-30' r.. 19.07' rT 70 lr - zsr-a' r.. w.7e' lz To » - La9r-zs' r.. 51.72' 13 To 1/ - ii_-SST'-30" Y., ».61' 11 TO 15 - LZ3'~S'-lo' E.. 171.17' is To lc - Lzs•+1' E.. lll.a' 16 TO 17 - Lia'J2' E., 191.21' 17 TD la - L1i'-at'-3o' E.. 176.11' 16 TO 1! - L ls'~6'-30' E.. 91.0' i! TO 20 - L1T'-S1'~0" E.. 135.75' 20 TO 21 - LQ'i7'-30' E.. 190.!1' 21 TO 1 - La~'~1'E. 11.26' p~ Ur P1/ 0 of*~~ ~~' -_ ~'~ ~d' ~~ P ~~J ~ I J~ 5 ~/ 9_ ._ - - i ~ - ~L-----.---' - ~ . vG ~~~ JiGi./ 6X/.JTivG 10 U~ ~' ~ Tr~~ea 7a ~' / ~p REMp.../ ~ •opo~~l~/~o~ ~ ~ ~~ / ~ Q` i~ ~ j ~ ~o ~ ~ ~ ~-}.~ 0 /9 ~~ ~~D ~ ~~'~~ ~o TOTi~L n ooR~S/~/G - Q!' /7 Boo uEtr+ce.ce- P~, ~ TOT~G. GQip " • 4~ aCRa3 fir` ,Q, • F~EGREpT/ONpL. _ J ~V \ oRCa - ~~ O\Z ~ /ri ~ \p V ~~ ~~" \ ~'' ~/c /7T/~/G TREE.:! '77~ REM/~/ -~ /? _ /~ /a /O O ~~ - 2 - i ~~ ~ ? W 0 Oa C7 5 i~ r dCJ/LD/NC. C~E.3GR/PT'/ON / FELLOWQH/A HpL[- //h//T/~L-J O pPPROx. 4d x ri0' _ ?,400 .~~ Ft1 O C~.G.'~.7400M EX~G/J.?/O/.I (FUT(,W~ $ vuOiTOR/UM /FUTURE O pvPROx. Qg'Y /00' •x.800 .J.F fil OGTE~ G•30-QG 3GG L E O 50 i00 ?CX~ o~'t-~ i~ GO~/CEOTU~ L OL ~ ~/ $ 0YM1S a T'R//.J/ Ty C/-/URGN ~" ;J J. RTE. ?20 6 vp .JEG RTE. q58 V/G/~.//Ty M~f~ .... 1 ~A` ~ _r VV •~ J ~,~ - ~ OV ~ ~ r ~a `~ ~ ~o,,~ s ~. J i ' ~ \ ~QQ ~ KNoe ~' /" VICINI?'Y MAP w OP01 ~~~~ NORTH 1 ~~~~ ~~ CASE NUMBER: REVIEWED BY: STAFF REPORT 34-8/89 PETITIONER: Trinity Church Jon Hartley DATE: July 27, 1989 Petition of Trinity Church to rezone a 5.43 acre tract from M-2, Industrial to B-1, Business to construct a church, located along the east side of U.S. Route 220 at its intersection with Route 958 in the Cave Spring Magisterial District. 1. NATURE OF REQUEST a. Petitioner proposes to construct a church containing approximately 2,400 square feet with seating for approximately 150 people on a 5.43 acre parcel. Future expansion contemplated at this time would include 12 classrooms intended for Sunday school purposes and a 300 seat auditorium, which would bring the total to 10,080 square feet. The petitioner has indicated that the facilities would not be used concurrently. The property in question was rezoned from A-1, Agriculture, to M-2, Industrial in September, 1986, for a lumberyard and landscaping materials business and contractor's yard. Proffer of conditions at that time included maintaining existing large trees around the perimeter of the site, in addition to the uses. b. Petitioner has not proposed any proffer of conditions with this request at this time. c. Attached concept plan and zoning vicinity map describe project more fully. 2. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS a. The B-1, Business district permits churches, schools, two-family and multi-family residences (excluding high rise apartments), and a wide variety of office uses. Churches and schools are also permitted in the A-1, Agricultural and RE, Residential Estates districts. Staff encouraged petitioner to apply for one of these districts rather than the B-1 request submitted. b. Site plan review will be required to insure compliance with County regulations. c. Commercial entrance permit will be required from VDOT. 3. SITE CHARACTERISTICS a. Topography: The proposed site consists of a shallow basin or bowl, with steep side slopes and a level bottom area. One drainage way adjoins the northern boundary while another traverses the southern portion of the site. b. Ground Cover: The site trees, with larger trees 4. AREA CHARACTERISTICS a. Future Growth Priority: Planning Area. The groi growth. is covered primarily by brush and small along the perimeter of the site. Situated within the Clearbrook Community oth initiative for this area is to limit - 4 - b. General area is primarily open space and woodland, with scattered residential development. 5. LAND USE IMPACT ASSESSMENT Rating: Rate each factor according to the impact of the proposed action. Use a scale of 1 through 5. 1 = positive impact, 2 = negligible impact, 3 = manageable impact, 4 = disruptive impact, 5 = severe impact, and N/A = not applicable. RATING FACTOR COMMENTS LAND USE COMPATIBILITY 4 a. Comprehensive Plan: 1985 Comprehensive Development Plan has placed this area within a Rural Preserve land use category. The specific use proposed is consistent with the comprehensive plan policies and map, in that institutional uses, such as churches and schools are of moderate compatibility. However, the uses permitted in the B-1 district proposed, such as two- family and multi-family residences or office uses would be inconsistent with the plan policies. No proffer of conditions for the use have been submitted with this request. 2 b. Surrounding Land: The adjoining land uses consist of open space and rural residences to the north, south and east, and the Norfolk and Southern railroad track to the west. U.S. Route 220 also runs along the northern perimeter of this site. 2 c. Neighboring Area: The neighboring area consists of open space (mainly woodland), rural residential uses and major transportation uses (railroad and major arterial highway). 3 d. Site Layout: The proposed concept plan appears well laid out based on the site characteristics, and provides for adequate on-site traffic circulation. The number of parking spaces meets the requirements for the fellowship hall (1 for every four seats, but will need to be expanded to accommodate the proposed auditorium (1 for every 4 seats). Access is proposed from only Route 958. However, the proposed layout is not binding unless the concept plan is proffered as a condition by the petitioner. 2 e. Architecture: The architecture of the proposed buildings has not been specified. 2 f. Screening and Landscaping: Since the site is totally surrounded by road or railroad rights-of-way, no screening and buffering is required. Screening indicated on the concept plan between the proposed buildings and Route 958 is not binding unless specifically proffered or part of a proffered concept plan. 3 g. Amenities: Outdoor lighting proposed for the site has not been indicated. Lighting should be limited in height, and strength to minimize impact on surrounding residences. - 5 - ~' ~~,r~ 3 h. Natural Amenities: A number of trees of var in size, age, and condition are located alon they g species, the site. Except for the entrance. these treesershould be maintained and protected during construction. The Virginia Department of Forestry has indicated they are available to assist the petitioner with tree protection during construction. TRAFFIC 3 i. Street Capacities: U.S. Route 220 had an average daily trips (ADT) of 18,070 in 1986 (of which 15% is truck traffic), while Route 958 had an ADT of 21. Based on Trip Generation by the Institute of Transportation Engineers, the estimated ADT for the proposed project in total is 78 on weekdays and 317 on Sundays. No accidents were reported during 1987 in the vicinity of the intersection of U.S. Route 220 and Route 958. ? j. Circulation: Access from U.S. Route 220 to Route 958 is accommodated by both a left and right turn deceleration lane, with adequate sight distance in either direction. Access to the site is indicated on the concept plan only from Route 958. On site circulation appears sufficient for anticipated traffic and emergency equipment. UTILITIES 2 k. Water: Private on-lot water supply which must be approved by the State Health Department. 2 1. Sewer: Private septic system and drainfield which must be approved by the State Health Department. DRAINAGE ? m. Basin: Site is on the divide of the Back Creek and Maggodee Creek watersheds. N/A n. Flood plain: Not Applicable. PUBLIC SERVICES 2 0. Fire Protection; Within established service standard. ? p. Rescue: Within established service standard. ? q. Parks and Recreation: Concept plan indicates recreation space in the southern portion of the parcel, but has not indicated the specific use. N/A r. Schools: TAX BASE 3 s. - Land and Improvement Value: - Taxable Gross Sales/Year: - Total Employees: - Total Revenue to the County/Year: Approximately ENVIRONMENT 2 t. Air: - 6 - 8 sq- / 2 u. Water: 2 v, Soils: 2 w, Noise: 3 x. Signage: Concept plan indicates one sign at the intersection of Route 220 and 958. The size and type of this and other signs has not been specified. It should be noted, however, that the minimum setback for all signs is fifteen feet from the right-of-way. 6. PLAN CONSISTENCY This area is designated as Rural Preserve. The proposed use is consistent with the policies and map contained in the Comprehensive Plan. However, other uses permitted in the zoning district proposed would be inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 7. STAFF EVALUATION a. Strengths: (1) The specific use proposed is consistent with the policies and map contained in the Comprehensive Plan; (2) The proposed concept plan appears well laid out based on the site characteristics; and, (3) Access is proposed from only Route 958. b. Weaknesses: (1) Uses permitted in the zoning district proposed would be inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan; .(2) Petitioner has not proposed any proffer of conditions with this request (see below). c. Proffers Suggested: (1) Development of the site shall be in substantial conformity with the concept plan prepared Charles M. Anderson dated June 30, 1989; (2) The use shall be limited to a church, school and related activities; (3) All healthy mature trees shall be maintained around the perimeter of the site, except those necessary to cut for the entrance to the site; (4) Signage shall be limited to one freestanding sign containing no more than 100 square feet and no temporary or portable signs, or billboards shall be permitted; and, (5) Outdoor lighting, except essential security lighting, shall be no more than 14 feet in height, shall not exceed one footcandle measured at the base of structure supporting the light fixture, and shall be extinguished when facilities are not in use. - 7 - VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY A 5.43 acre parcel of land, ) generally located east side of US 220 ) approx. 4 mi. north of Franklin Co. line) within the Cave Sprina ) Magisterial District, and ) recorded as parcel # 114.00-1-68 ) in the Roanoke County Tax Records. ) `PO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY: WHEREAS, your Petitioner Trinity Church has filed with the Secretary to the Planning Commission a petition to rezone the above-referenced parcel of land from P~1-2, General Industrial District to B-1, Office District for the purpose of constructing a church building. WHEREAS, the petition was referred to the Planning Cunnission which, after due legal notice as required by Section 15.1-431 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended, did hold a public hearing on August 1, , 19 89 and WHEREAS, at that public hearing all parties in interest were afforded an opportunity to be heard; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due consideration has recatmended to the Board of County Supervisors that the rezoning be approved with proffered conditions ~" -.-~ RDOCINY~~IDATION NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Cannission recommends to the Board of County Supervisors that the above-referenced parcel of land be rezoned from M-2, General Industrial to B-l, Office with proffered conditions The above action was adopted on motion of Don Witt following recorded vote: Aye: Massey, Winstead, Gordon, Robinson, Witt ~,yg; None and upon the ~~; None Respectful submitted, S retary, Ro ~oke County Planning Commission 8 ~~` ~ ,2- PETITIONER: IABO INVESTORS CASE NCMBER: 33-8/89 Planning Commission Hearing Date: August 1, 1989 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: August 22, 1989 A. R~UEST Petition of LOBO Investors to rezone a 6.14 acre tract from R-5, Residential to R-1, Residential to construct single family hones, located along the south side of Buck Mountain Road, 200 feet east from its intersection with Branderwood Drive in the Cave Spring Magisterial District. B. CITIZEN PARTICIPA'T'ION E. C. Hedrick, representing his neighborhood, expressed concerns with the request. Residents are not opposed to the rezoning but are opposed to further development until the drainage problem is corrected--insufficient drainage in the area has caused extensive property damage. He presented a petition containing signatures of residents who are opposed to further development. C. SIGNIFICANT IMPACT FACTORS 1. None. D. PROFFERED CONDITIONS 1. No driveways will enter individual dwellings from Buck Mountain Road. 2. A natural wooded buffer area will be retained between Buck Mountain Road and residences to be constructed on the north side of proposed "50 ft. roadway" (proposed Whipplewood Court). 3. Only one roadway or entrance either public or private (excluding construction entrances) will be developed from Buck Mountain Road. This roadway will be the existing Branderwood Drive. E. OONIl~IISSIONER' S MOTION, Vt7rE AND REASON Mr. Witt moved to approve the petition with proffered conditions. The motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Massey, Winstead, Gordon, Robinson, Witt NAYS: None .ABSENT: None F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE None. G . ATI'ACH[~~NTS X Concept Plan (8~" x 11") X Vicinity Map (8~" x 11") .- -~ X Staf f Report ~, ' ~' ~~ Other ~~~ ,~~ ~, ~, Jo Hartley, Alter to Secretary R oke County Planning Commission ob '~d 11 ~ a uooM~~aNd~v W 4Nd0 3i1L ~0 Nd/Ula'W .~ ,x` o~. ~\ ~~V ~~ \ w/ . ~~ ~~'~ O r- pi _ o ~ Z/ ~~ ea o ~ R ~ ~ ~ y ~ ~ ~ ~'~ Oa•s7'~ s' E ~tia~~ ~ ; 6s.co ~ .s 6. ~ ~ ~ ! ! ~ 1 .L~1 •~ r" ~ ~ ~ cv o ,r '~ w N ~ N ~ N ~ ~ L- , ~ N N , o ~ ,lbl ~ 1 ~ N N . "~ u v ~ °~ ~ 1 7' ~ v'~ . bl c ~ `r ~ ~ e3~ ~ tO co ~; 11 O ~ z 1 N ~ ~ ~ o ~` Q .- r ~ 17' ~ ~ o- ~ ~ N Lj Z6 3• f v o0 C O a ¢'~ O ~„~^• MO` ^O.~ N ~- 2 N p ~ ~ 3 ~ 2 0 . ~ 0 ~ ~. 3? ;n o ~ `Qe~ r77 02~~~ 47 v~Q1 n ~ti I~`Z 1 -_ ~. a, ~ rn U N . . .~ --. ~ ~- ~ a Z ~ ~ -- ~ N _Z ~ _ ~' 2 < J U1 o v :~.7 a a z z ~ ~ ~ ° > ao N~ W Z ~ } ,,..]aw I ~ a0 U? ~_y ~ a G'Zp ~ Ow O N2 ~.. ~ ... C.~ 2 Y O ~ ~ z ~ O _ ~ O a z cn Q n C:] .n ~ p ~ ~ ~ J ~ Q ~ Z ~ U y j «~ Z QJ a W U N ., n ~~ ~ _ t v ~ ~ ~? A iA O~ ~ ~ ~ »' Z~ 1~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~fl M ~ ~ ~~ ~ \` N N Cf v N O ~ ~ .OS 56 ~ \~ • Q •! ` ~ ! ,181 ` ,S9t ,S8'Sb~ M .OOiF•b0 S I - 2 - 62c '9d 9y6 B ~8"9- NORTH ~' ~ ~~. STAFF REPORT CASE NUMBER: 33-8/89 PETITIONER: LOBO INVESTORS REVIEWED BY: TIM BEARD DATE: AUGUST 1, 1989 Petition of LOBO Investors to rezone a 6.14 acre tract from R-5, Residen- tial to R-1, Residential to construct single family homes, located along the south side of Buck Mountain Road (VA 679), 200 feet east from its intersection with Branderwood Drive (VA 1960) in the Cave Spring Magisterial District. 1. NATURE OF REQUEST a. Unconditional request to construct detached single family homes on 18 individual lots in Section 5 of Branderwood Subdivision. b. Attached concept plan and vicinity map describe project more fully. 2. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS a. R-1, Residential District permits single family home construction and sale in addition to a limited number of other uses such as country clubs, churches, community clubs, and public organization uses. b. Site plan review will be required to ensure compliance with County regulations. c. Private entrance permits will be required from VDOT. 3. SITE CHARACTERISTICS a. Topography: Predominantly flat; no apparent natural drainageways on site. b. Ground Cover: Densely wooded with oak, maple, sourwood and pine surrounding a newly cut roadbed. 4. AREA CHARACTERISTICS a. Future Growth Priority: Situated within the Cave Spring Community Planning Area. Designated as a stable growth area; currently receiving urban services. b. General area is developed with single and multifamily residential, institutional, limited office commercial, general retail and scattered woodland. 5. LAND USE IMPACT ASSESSMENT Rating: Rate each factor according to the impact of the proposed action. Ose a scale of 1 through 5. 1 = positive impact, 2 negligible impact, 3 manageable impact, 4 = disruptive impact, 5 = severe impact, and N/A = not applicable. RATING FACTOR COMMENTS LAND USE COMPATIBILITY 2 a. Comprehensive Plan: 1985 Comprehensive Development Plan has placed this area within a Development land use category. This designation encourages the development of low to middle density residential. Proposed density of development is 2.93 units per acre. - 4 - `' ~~Y ~. 2 2 2 2 3 2 3 2 2 b. Surrounding Land: Single and multifamily residential, secondary highways, recreation. c. Neighboring Area: Single and multifamily residential, secondary highways, office and institutional, general retail. d. Site Layout: Eighteen lots will be served by a cul-de-sac extension of existing Whipplewood Drive (VA 1961). Petitioner has indicated a willingness to proffer the site plan guaranteeing no direct public street access from Buck Mountain Road. Staff also is seeking the prohibition of any private driveways from Buck Mountain Road. e. Architecture: Colonial design similar to existing homes in Branderwood. f. Screening and Landscape: None required per ordinance. VA Department of Forestry has recommended selective retention of trees throughout the site, taking care to protect trees from construction related damage caused by soil compaction and physical damage to trunks and roots. More active protection should be employed to avoid future problems and to assure quality vegetation. g. Amenities: Parking will include private driveways off cul-de-sac leading to proposed double garages for each unit. h. Natural Features: Other than selected tree retention and the maintenance of existing buffer adjoining the south side of Buck Mountain Road, property will be fully developed. TRAFFIC i. Street Capacities: ADT for Branderwood and Whipplewood Drive (VA 1961) is not available. 1986 ADT for Buck Mountain Road was 2,425 vehicles. Anticipated additional ADT is 180 vehicle trip ends per day. Between January 1987 and February 1988, one accident was reported on the 1/3 mile segment of Buck Mountain Road from Starkey Road (VA 904) to Reefer Road (VA 917). j. Circulations The 50' wide cul-de-sac proposed to serve all 18 lots is a natural extension of existing Whipplewood Drive and will not intersect Buck Mountain Road. UTILITIES 2 k. Water: Adequate source and distribution. 2 1. Sewer: Adequate treatment and transmission. DRAINAGE 2 m. Basin: Back Creek; no problems noted. 2 n. Floodplain: No portion of subject property lies within federally designated f loodplain. PUBLIC SERVICES 2 0. Fire Protection: Within established service standard. 2 p. Rescue: Within established service standard. 1 q. Parks and Recreation: Existing pool and proposed tennis court adjoin western border of subject site. Two Roanoke County parks lie 1 to 1} miles west of subject property. - 5 - ~- ~' 2 r. School: If 18 single family units are built, it may be anticipated that there will be 12 school age residents. The school board staff has said that area schools have sufficient capacity to accommodate the students from this subdivision. The estimated cost of educating 12 children per year is $44,580 of which $21,552 is locally funded. The difference between total local cost and total revenue is +$6,393. TAX BASE 2 s. - Land and Improvement Value: Estimated $2.4 million. - Taxable Gross Sales/Year: N/A - Total Employees: N/A - Total revenue to the County/Year: Approximately $27,945. New revenue approximately $26,884. ENVIRONMENT 2 t. Air: 2 u. Water: 2 v. Soils: 2 w. Noise: 2 x. Signage: Not specified. 6. PLAN CONSISTENCY This area is designated as Development. Petitioner's request is consistent with the land use plan map and with policies D-1 (manage new residential growth through the capacity and availability of public services); D-2 (encourage innovation in residential development and building design); D-4 (provide common open space and recreational facilities for large-scale residential projects); and D-7 (provide activity centers such as parks and recreation facilities that benefit new community residents). 7. STAFF $VALOATIO~1 a. Strengths: tl) Proposal is consistent with policies D-1, D-2, D-4, and D-7 as described above. b. Weaknessess (1) Lack of site plan-related proffers. c. Proffers suggested: (1) Site will be developed in substantial conformity with preliminary plat dated May 31, 1989. (2) No driveways will enter individual dwellings from Buck Mountain Road. (3) A natural wooded buffer area will be retained between Buck Mountain Road and residences to be constructed on the north side of proposed "50 ft. roadway" (proposed Whipplewood Court). - 6 - VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF RQANOKE OOi]NTY A 6.14 acre parcel of land, ) generally located on the south side ) of Buck Mountain Road, S.W. ) within the Cave Spring ) Magisterial District, and ) recorded as parcel # 97.02 - 1 - 10) in the Roanoke County Tax Records. RDCONl~TDATION TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF RQANOKE COUNTY: WHEREAS, your Petitioner LOBO Investors X 89'-Z has filed with the Secretary to the Planning Commission a petition to rezone the above-referenced parcel of land from R-5 Conditional District to R-1 Conditional District for the purpose of constructing single family homes. WHEREAS, the petition was referred to the Planning Commission which, after due legal notice as required by Section 15.1-431 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended, did hold a public hearing on August 1 , 19 89 and WHEREAS, at that public hearing all parties in interest were afforded an opportunity to be heard; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due consideration has recatmended to the Board of County Supervisors that the rezoning be approved with proffered conditions. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission rec~onarends to the Board of County Supervisors that the above-referenced parcel of land be rezoned from R-5, Residential with proffered conditions to R-1, Residential with proffered conditions. The above action was adopted on motion of Don Witt and upon the follaaing recorded vote: pyFS; Massey, Winstead, Gordon, Robinson, Witt NAy$; None AB$~; None Respectful){~~s}~b~mitted, e etar s~ y Roanoke County Planning Commission - ~yrruruururrrururrrruuuurrrurrrurrrruruurrrruruu~ururuuuuu~~I~~~I~11~~1U111111U111111111111111/Illlllllj~ - - ~ - ~ _ APPEA ~ ~~_ ~ RANCE RE VEST -~ ~ - - - - - - - - _ _ AGENDA ITEM NO. ~ _ _ _ _ _ = n - - SUBJECT --, - - - _ n ~ .~ ~. - - I would like t e - _ = C~halrman of the Board of Su ervisors _- = recognize me during the public hearing on the above ~ma = tier - _ sot at I may comment.WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM = I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS F _ = OR THE ~ _ c RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW. - _ • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment - whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will - decide the time limit based on the number of citizens s eakin on an ' - .= and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majorpity of the Board to e~ do otherwise. .... _ _ .= • Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view onl , ues- Lions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman, y Q _- _ _ _ • All comments must be directed to the Board. - speaker and audience members is not allowed. ebate between a recognized - __ • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times, c = Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments c with the clerk. _ c __ _ • INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED ,= GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION c FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. _ - PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO DEP = UTY CLERK _= NAME_ ~Tn I„ ~ ~~ ~ ~ (~ 1 ~~ „~ (1 ~~ ~ S C ~ _ ~. 1. n _. ~. _.. ~. - ADDRESS G = 1 ~~ ~ _ _ c L~ - -_ PHONE ~ ~' c - 5` 7 ~ ,= - - nllllllllilllllllllllllllilllllllilllllllllllllllllillllllllillllllllllll IIIIIIIiilillllil IIIIIIIIillililllllllllllllllllllllllllm +,y.......u.u..uuuuu...u.uuuu..uuuu.ruuuruuuuuuuuu1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111/lllllllllu - - ~.. ~ - - ~/ ~. ~- ~ / -• AP ~ __ _ Q PEARANCE RE VEST ~ ~~, _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ = AGENDA ITEM NO. ~'' - ~ _ _ c = - SUBJECT = - I w ul~ 1iKe the ~;nau~man of th _ recognize me durin the ubli a Board of Supervisors to = _ - g p c hearing on the above matter = c = - sot at I may comment.WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, c = I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE _ __ RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES c LISTED BELOW. c = - Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will = _= decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, c and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ... = Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Ques- Lions of clarification may be entertained by the Chauman. ._ - - c • All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized _= speaker and audience members is not allowed. - ,_ • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. c - _ • Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. _ c _- c • INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED "" GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRI'T'TEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. - _ _ = PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO DEPUTY CLERK _= NAME C~. -~ c - - _ - ,= ADDRESS •~~ _ - _- PHONE ,~' ~~ ~ ~ ~- - - - - - - _ m ~~ ~- ~ To: Board of Supervisors County of Roanoke We, the undersigned, are concerned about the "urban floodimentphaslcreated in the Starkey Rd. and Buck Mountain Rd. area. All the develop water run-off problems resutcrnnown pTheeproblemaneedsTto bercorrectednbefore system cannot handle the wa more damage is done and further development continues. ~ .t_._ -, /j~- j r ' ~ '. I i __ ~ ~+ _.~ ~ r ~~ . ~~=~ :mil ~C)~ Name and address To: Hoard of Supervisors County of Roanoke We, the undersigned, are concerned about .the "urban ,flooding" problem in the Starkey Rd. and Buck Mountain Rd. area.' All the development has created water run-off problems .resulting in property damage. The current drainage system cannot handle the water now. The problem needs to be corrected before more damage is done and further development continues. Name and address ,~ - l ~ ~~~~ ~~ ~-~ o ~.,c~r ~i'~ ~.. ~~ ~~ -~' A ~~ :., ,, f ,~ r ,~ ~, To: Hoard of Supervisors County of Roanoke We, the undersigned, are concerned about,the "urban flooding" problem in the Starkey Rd. and Buck Mountain Rd. area. All the development has created water run-off problems resulting in property damage. The current drainage system cannot handle the water now. The problem needs to be corrected before more damage is done and further development continues. Name and address To: Board of Supervisors ' County of Roanoke ale, the undersigned, are concerned about .the "urban flooding" problem in the Starkey Rd. and Buck Mountain Rd. area. All the development has created water run-off problems resulting in property damage. The current drainage system cannot handle the water now. The problem needs to be corrected before more damage is done and further development continues. Name and ~ dress .~ r-~ %1 p~`~f,~ v~^zcac~~ G,ya.Z7C'/cf L-~ 1L'~ , J~ zn~ ~~ //n] C ,' ` d n~ 9 r... t- ~---" '~'C~ -. --~ z~~ i~ Vim? c' ~~ ' ~ ~ ~~ ~c~is/ Zclf~/y ~~ ~~~~ __.,l~,~kof~ To: Board of Supervisors County of Roanoke We, the undersigned, are concerned about the "urban flooding" problem in the Starkey Rd. and Buck Mountain Rd. area.' All the development has created water run-off problems resulting in property damage. The current. drainage system cannot handle the water now. The problem needs to be corrected before more damage is done and further development continues. Name and address ~. ,~~_~ .S1 YD -- .~~ 3 y c2~s~~' I31~~ S~ ~ trtr F ~~. ., .,may' / r :'~ t ~ ~""' :i ~ ;v` ~, ~ ~. ~ ~.~L4 ~?'~! pie ~e9 7` ... i -..., -~ C Y ~ _.. ,. r , ;,.,.,,. _ ~ ` ~ ~~~ ,~. ~ _ ~ _ ~ l ~,a . ~ ~ :. ~:. _ 1,; ~~ ~ ~~ ,. ~ i j, ~ . r r ,, r,~~ ~ : `~ - ., ~ ,~~ %~ , . ~, ~ f, ~~ _. _._-.,,._-.r To: Board of Supervisors ' County of Roanoke We, the undersigned, are concerned about the "urban'flooding~' problem in the Starkey Rd, and Buck Mountain Rd. ar.ea.:,Ril the development has. created water run-off problems resulting in property damage. The current drainage system cannot handle the water now. The- problem needs to be corr®cted before mots damage is done and further development continues. Name and address 1~ ',~ / ~` ~~ ~~ PETITIONER: HDC, INC. CASE N[A~iBER: 30-8/89 Planning Cam[nission Hearing Date: August 1, 1989 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: August 22, 1989 A. REQUEST Petition of HDC, Inc. to rezone a 19.30 acre tract from R-6, Residential to R-3, Residential to construct single family homes, located along the south side of Adamson Road, 300 feet from its intersection with Garst Mill Road in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District. B. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION Several interested residents were present, but no one expressed opposition to the project. C. SIGNIFICANT IMPACT FAC`T'ORS 1. None. D. PROFFERED CONDITIONS 1. Property to be developed in substantial conformity with site plan prepared by Lumsden & Associates, dated July 25, 1989. 2. Develo~nent will be ccanprised of single family detached residences only. E. COMMISSIONER'S MO'T'ION, VOTE AND REASON Mr. Gordon moved to approve the petition with proffered conditions. The motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Massey, Winstead, Gordon, Robinson, Witt NAYS: None ABSENT: None F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE None. G. ATrACHMEN'I'S X Concept Plan (8~" x 11") X Vicinity Map (8~" x 11") X Staff Report Other ~. Jon.' rtley, Alternate Secretary Roa oke County Planning Canmission ~~ , ~' ~ ~ ~ ~s A ~~ ~ is ~~~ ~~ ;~ ~~ , ~ ~ ~ f K ~ ~~ ^~ ~ ~~ ~« ~ ~ ~ f~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o €~i i ~ ~ ~~ ~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~ ~~ ~ R ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~, t~~~ Q ~ ~~ ,, f~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~~~~~~~~ ~ ~~_~~~~~~ ~ j~ ~, ~/ - ,- ~f ~~~t ~~ ~~ ~-- riwrwM'. O ~~ta W~a w m a .. ~.. /I =~t // _ ~: \ ~ f~ ~t 1 r ,. . _# ~, "s ~ _.. , ' ~~ ~ II .'~~i I I «~ ~ s~ ..:~ i I ,~,~ ~, - 2 - t F- -- --1 ~ N ~~ ... STAFF REPORT CASE NUMBER, 30-8/89 PETITIONER, H.D.C., Inc. REVIEWED BY, Dale Castellow ~ DATE, August 1, 1989 Petition of Hollins Development Company, Inc. to rezone a 19.30 acre tract from R-6, Residential to R-3, Residential to construct single famady300dfeet fromoits~intersection with Garst Mill in the Ada,son Ro , Windsor Hills Magisterial District. 1. NATURE OF REQUEST a, Conditional request to downzone 19.3 acres from R-6, Residential to R-3, Residential to construct 25 single family detached homes and 21 patio or townhomes. Proffered conditions allow for an alternate development concept that would include eight additional single family units in place of the proposed patio homes. b. Attached concept plan and zoning vicinity map describe the project more fully. 2. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS a. The site is currently zoned R-6, Residential. The R-6 district permits multifamily condominium development at a density of approximately 20-25 units per acre. Petitioner is requesting an amendment to R-3, Multifamily Residential. The R-3 district permits a variety or residential uses including single family detached, townhomes, multifamily dwellings and high-rise apartments. Based on the R-3 regulations, 25-30 units per acre are permitted depending the size and number of bedrooms in each unit. Petitioner is proffering that the development will occur in substantial conformity with the attached concept plan. b. Site plan revier rill be required to ensure compliance with County regulations. Aa part of the site plan revier process, petitioner ^ay be required to delineate the boundaries of any floodray rhich •ay be located on the site. 3. SITE CHARACTERISTICS a. Topograp~Y natural drainage channelm is to at dt along athe steep. eastern property boundary. b. Ground Cover: Nature trees with dense for growing vegetation. The Virginia Depart'ent of Forestry advises that the petitioner should ^ake an effort to utilize and preserve the vegetative resources on this site. Specifically, the area forester has recommended the petitioner market the larger trees for sawtimber and veneer and/or plan the development so the trees can be preserved. The forester suggests that if any trees are to be preserved, special measures must be taken to ensure the stems and roots are not damaged or disturbed during construction. - 4 - ~~ 4. AREA CHARACTERISTICS a. Future Growth Priority Situated within the Nindsor Hills Community Planning Area, thin area has been designated for stable growth. b. General area is predominantly detached single family homes. Some commercial, institutional and multifamily land uses are located southwest of this site along Garst Mill Road. 5. LAND USE IMPACT ASSESSMENT Rating: Rate each factor according to the impact of the proposed action. Use a scale of 1 through 5. 3 - manageable 1 positive impact, 2 - negligisevere impact, and N/A not impact, 4 - disruptive impact, 5 applicable. RATING FACTOR COMMENTS LAND USE COMPATIBILITY 2 a, Comprehensive Pian: 1985 Comprehensive Development Plan has placed this area within a Development land use category. Residential development at a density of up to 12 units per acre is encouraged in areas designated as Development. Petitioner's proffered concept plan is well below the 12 units per acre limit. This proposal is consistent with the applicable land use policies set forth in the County's Comprehensive Development Plan. 2 b. Surrounding Land: Site is situated between two single family detached subdivisions. The parcel immediately east of the site is unimproved. 2 c. Neighboring Areas The neighboring area is predominantly single fa~ily with some •ultifaiily and commercial land uses along Garst Hill Road. ~ d. Site Layouts Petitioner has proffered that the development will occur in suatantial conformity with the attached concept plan. Petitioner does reserve the right to alter the concept plan to include eight additional single family detached units in place of the proposed patio homes. Consequently, the development would consist of either 25 lots for single family detached reaidencea and 21 lots, clustered at the northern and southern coat boundaries of the site, for patio or townhome reaidencea or 33 lots for single family detached units. 2 e. Architecture: Petitioner advises that restrictive covenants ensuring compatible architectural styles will be attached to the development. 2 f. Screening and Landscaping: Nith the exception of the property boundary surrounding the proposed patio homes, screening and buffering will not be required as the surrounding land uses are also single family detached. In the event the patio homes are included as illustrated on the proffered concept plan, "Type B" screening and buffering would be required. The proffered concept plan also includes numerous~plantings along both the access - 5 - } ,.. road and within the common area throughout the development. Petitioner advises the plantings are for illustrative purposes only and are not being proffered as part of the plan. Staff has reconaended the petitioner note this fact on the concept plan. 2 g. Amenities Proffered concept plan includes two small water bodies a playground and a jogging trail. Actual development of the proposed water bodies is contingent upon sufficient storm water detention facilities. 2 h. Natural Amenities: Proffered concept plan includes ample open space. Plan includes two water bodies with assorted recreational facilities. TRAFFIC 3 i. Street Capacities: Based on trip generation rates compiled by the Institute of Transportation Engineers, staff estimates this proposal will generate approximately 462 vehicle trips per day. Traffic surveys conducted in 1986 revealed an ADT of 455 along Larson Lane and 7,374 along Garst Mill Road at its intersection with Larson Lane. Although sufficient capacity exists to accommodate the proposed development, congestion will be increased at the Larson Lane - Garst Mill intersection making turning movements more difficult during Borning and evening peak hours. 3 j. Circulation: As previously mentioned, access to the subdivision would be gained Eros Garst Mill Road via Larson Lane. The subdivision would consist of two streets both of which would be cul-de-sacs. Proposed single family detached units would be extend along the two raodways, while the patio homes would be clustered at the end of each cul-de-sac. Sach single family detached residence would front on a publically maintained roadway. UlILITIS$ ~ k. watery Adequate supply and distribution. 2 1. Sewers Adequate treat'ent and transmission. DRAINAGE ~ m. Basin: Located in the mudlick drainage basin. 3 n. Floodplain~ Staff recommends the petitioner proffer the construction of a stormwater detention facility designed to accommodate a 10-year storm witD a 2-year release rate. Pursuant to County Ordinance 82587-7, petitioner may be required to delineate any flood plain boundaries that may be located on the site. PUBLIC SERVICES 2 0. Fire Protection: Within established service standard. 2 p. Rescues Within established service standard. 2 q, Parks and Recreation: Proffered concept plan includes a playground, walking trail, and outdoor shelter. - 6 - ~~` ~ r. Schools: Based on demographic multipliers for comparable houaing units, this proposal would generate approximately 39 school age children. According to the school board staff, students from this development would attend Oak Grove Elementry, Hidden Valley Junior High, and Cave Spring High. The school board staff advises there is ample capacity to accommodate the 39 students projected from this development. TAX BASE N/A s. - Land and Improvement Value: N/A - Taxable Gross Sales/Year: N/A - Total Employees: N/A - Total Revenue to the County/Year: Unknown ENVIRONMENT 2 t. Air: 2 u. Water: 2 v. Soils: 2 w. Noise: 3 x. Signage: Proffered concept plan does not include any Signage. 6. PLAN CONSISTENCY This area is designated as a Development land use category. The petitioner's proposal is consistent with the land use plan map and policies set forth in the County's Comprehensive Development Plan. 7. STAFF EVALUATION a. 3trengths~ (1) Proposal is consistent with plan policies. (2) Proffered concept plan denotes a density which is,co®parable to the surrounding residential land uses. (3) Proffered concept plan includes on-site recreation facilities with ample open space. b. Neaknesaea~ (1) Increased traffic volutes resulting from thin proposal will increase congestion at the intersection of Larson Lane and Garet Mill Road. c. Proffers Suggested (1) Staff recommends the petitioner proffer construction of a stormwater detention facility designed to accommodate a 10-year store with a 2-year release rate. - 7 - VIRQNIA: BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COU[1PY p, 19.3o acre parcel of land, ) generally located on Larson and ) Tomaranne Lane ) within the Windsor Hills ) Magisterial District, and ) recorded as parcel # 77.05 ) 2 - 46 & 48 _ ) in the Roanoke County Tax Records. ) Tp THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COU1~fPY: WHEREAS, your Petitioner H.D.C., Inc. has filed with the Secretary to the Planning Commission a petition to rezone the above-referenced parcel of land from R-6 District ~ R-3 District for the purpose of constructin patio & sin le famil homes. WHEREAS, the petition was referred to the Planning Commission which, after due legal notice as required bI' Section 15.1-431 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended, did hold a public hearing on August 1, 19 89 ; and WHEREAS, at that public hearing all parties in interest were afforded an opportunity to be heard; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due consideration has recarn~ended to the Board of County Supervisors that the rezoning be approved with proffered conditions ~~~"'~ RDOC~1LlATION NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Cannission reccmuriends to the Board of County Supervisors that the above-referenced parcel of land be rezoned from R-6,_Residential to R-3, Residential The above action was adopted on motion of Mike Gordon following recorded vote: Aye,; Massey, Winstead, Gordon, Robinson, Witt NAYSz None and upon the ABSENT: None Respe tfu s ~mitted, Sec tary, Rio Ca~ioke County Planning Commission PETITIONER: PATSY & CLYDE ppLLIE CASE ~gz; 31-8/89 Planning Commission Hearing Date: August 1, 1989 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: August 22, 1989 A. ~CTEST rate a bed Petition of Patsy n,~CdeoCowith a rresidence on a15a c ~e tract located at 4225 and breakfast in co ~ isterial District. Harborwood Road in the Catawba Mag B. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION ro rt owner, to Darlene Brown was present on behalf of her mother, an adjoining p Pe Y learn more about the request. C . SIGNIFICANT IMPACT FAC'1bRS None. D, PROFFE[tED CONDITIONS ied by the bed 1. The owner or owner's family shall reside on the pr~nises occup and breakfast. rooms shall be utilized for any one bed and 2. No more than five guest sleeping breakfast establishment. 3. Any building erected, rancegoa arsig lefamily re~nce ~Noarooms shall shall maintain the appea have a direct entrance or exit to the outside of the building. 4. Guests may stay no more than 14 consecutive nights in any one calendar year. The operator of the bed ands real cense platemnumber,nandllength oflstay Sand including their name, addre , shall make the log available to staff upon request. 5. Meals shall be provided only to overnight guests and no cooking shall be permitted in guest rooms. rovided on-site and shall not be 6. Parking for guests and employees shall be p located in unimproved yard areas. ~. The owner is responsible for complying with all other local, state and federa health, fire and safety laws and regulations which may apply. licensing, taxing, 8. Sign will be of wood construction and no more than 3' x 2' or 6 square eet. E. ~IISSIONER' S MOTION, WTE AND REASON Mr. Winstead moved to approve the petition with proffered conditions. The motion carried wiM~assee,fWinstead,rGordon,lRobinson, Witt AYES: Y NAYS: None p,BS~ ; None F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE None. G. ATTACI~lENTS X Concept Plan (8~" x 11") X Vicinity Map (8~" x 11") X Staff Report Other Jon ,ley, Alte Hate Secretary County Planning Conission bR~vFw~ '~ ~~ ~g ~/ N 1 a d a~ N d m A - w 3 i ~ ~ i ,,~ I ~ A ~ I V I ~ ~ iN _ r+f o ~ 1 ~' ~. I ,~ --- 0 - 2 - g~9~`~ ~ss~- y STAFF REPORT CASE NUMBER: 31-8/89 PETITIONER: PATSY E. ~ CLYDE F. COLLIE REVIEWED BY: ED DETRUDE DATE: AUGOST 1, 1989 Petition of Patsy & Clyde Collie for a Use Not Provided For Permit to operate a bed and breakfast in conjunction with a residence on a 5 acre tract located at 4225 Harborwood Road in the Catawba Magisterial District. 1. NATURE OF REQUEST a. Petitioners are requesting a Use Not Provided For Permit to operate a bed and breakfast, with two guest sleeping rooms in their home. The petitioners would encourage 2-3 nights' stay with a maximum of 14 days. Each suite will have a bathroom, bedroom and lounging area. b. Petitioners originally requested two guest rooms; however, staff recommended that the petitioners proffer the proposed conditions for bed and breakfast establishments in the proposed AG-5 Agricultural District. These conditions limit number of guest rooms to five as well as limit length of stay and other conditions. It was staff's intention to make the proposed use conform with the proposed standards. c. Attached concept plan and letter better describe the project. 2. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS a. The A-1 Agricultural District has no provisions for bed and breakfast; however, two family dwellings and commercial campgrounds (with Special Exception) are permitted. b. The Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance has no provisions for bed and breakfast establishments. c. Section 21-102-5 states that an application for a IIse Not .:provided For Permit may be made to the County "if, in any district, a use is not specifically permitted ...". d. Utilities Director notified the petitioners that the Sealth Department may require an additional permit or inspection with the proposed change in use.a e. Petitioners will be required to provide one parking space per guest room. 3. SITE CHARACTERISTICS a. Topographys The is situated on top of a large knoll; the area surrounding the entrance is flat. b. Ground Cover: Property is landscaped with a mix of flower beds, ivy, grass and trees. 4. AREA CHARACTERISTICS a. Future Growth Priority: Situated within the Glenvar Coaununity Planning Area. Currently no public water and sewer available; however, the site is within the urban service area . b. General area is rural with low density residential, some farming, woodland and steep slopes. ~~q- y 5. LAND USE IMPACT ASSESSMENT Rating: Rate each factor according to the impact of the proposed action. Use a scale of 1 through 5. 1 = positive impact, 2 = negligible impact, 3 = manageable impact, 4 = disruptive impact, 5 = severe impact, and N/A = not applicable. RATING FACTOR COMMENTS LAND USE COMPATIBILITY 2 a. Comprehensive Plan: 1985 Comprehensive Development Plan has placed this area within a Development land use category. Bed and breakfast use has not been identified in the Comprehensive Land Use Plan. 2 b. Surrounding Land: Basically a rural area with some low density residential, minor farming and woodlands. 2 c. Neighboring Area: There is a house on an adjacent tract; ible i i however, only the outbuilding and roof of the h s s v ouse from the site. 2 d e d u s g ~ u ti v ' house the ci cles that drEveway a site with n No changes existing layout indicated. 2 e. Architecture: Existing home to be utilized. 2 f. Screening and Landscape: Site is landscaped and has existing screening. 2 g Amenities: The whole site can be considered a n amenity. It is . a beautiful home located on a secluded tract of land. The house is well situated for a bed and breakfast. 2 h. Natural Features: Secluded site, attractive landscape. TRAFFIC 2 i' 737I is 1 laciRoute 639 iseatnarrow~rwindi g csecondary r ad Zand in 1987 there were 15 accidents. 2 j. Circulation: Existing driveway provides adequate turnaround space. UTILITIES 3 k. Water: Private water (well). Utilities Director notified the petitioners that the Health Department may require an additional permit or inspection with the proposed change in use. 3 1. Sewer: Private septic system. Utilities Director notified the petitioners that the Health Department may require an additional permit or inspection with the proposed change in use. DRAINAGE 2 m. Basin: Dry Branch Basin; no impact. N A n. Floodplain: Not within the limits of the 100 year floodplain. - 5 - ~' ~ ~ M y 3 0. 3 p. N/A q. N/A r. 2 s. 2 3 3 2 2 6. 7. t. u. v. PUBLIC SERVICES Fire Protection: Comprehensive Plan recommends 5 minutes as maximum. Site falls in the 4-8 minute service area. Rescue: Outside established service standards. Parks and Recreation: N/A. School: N/A. TAX BASE - Land and Improvement Value: Land $20,400. Existing house $70,400. - Taxable Gross Sales/Year: $6,000 - Total Employees: N/A, owner operated. roximately $11,250. Total revenue to the County/Year: App New revenue $100 to $200/year. ENVIRONMENT Air : No iFngact. Water: Change in use may require additional inspection and approval from Health Department. Soils: No impact. w. Noise: No impact. x. Signage: Petitioner has proffered a 3' x 2' wooden sign. The A-1 district permits business signs up t o 50 sq.ft. per 100 ft. of lot width; 312 sq.ft. of signage permitted. PLAN CONSISTENCY This area is designated as Development. The proposed development is not addressed in the plan. S?AFF EVALUATION a_ Strengths: (1) The attractiveness of the house and site combined with the proffered conditions. b. Weaknesses: (1) None. c. Proffers suggested: None. - 6 - VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY A _ ~ acre parcel of land, ) generally located ~ y~aS .~R~JoRtvooo ) within the ~q.~g~ ~~ ) Magisterial District, and ) recorded as parcel # 7~G4 - /-/7 ) 7.00 -/ /8'. ) in the Roanoke County Tax Records. ) TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY: WHEREAS, your Petitioner /Oj,~j~y ~¢- ~,~j~~/e ~D~~ ~ has filed with the Secretary to the Planning Commission a petition to request a "Use Not Provided For" permit for the above referenced parcel of land for the purpose of ,~B c/ ~9N,o ~ip PA-~~i457~'' WHEREAS, the petition was referred to the Planning Ca~mlission which, after due legal notice as required by Section 15.1-431 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended, did hold a public hearing on ~ve~~ ~T 3. 19 69 ;and WHEREAS, at that public hearing all parties in interest were afforded an opportunity to be heard; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due consideration has recannended to the Board of County Supervisors that the request be kY~c2a~ ec~ W ~-~tk 'pro ~,~ered (m~.J'~ ~T ~o~lLi `~ a- / NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission reca~niends to the Board of County Supervisors that the above-referenced parcel of land ~ e ~SS~Cb p~ Uh~c ~ d-t' 'Q~~s.~e ~ C?e,r urn ~ k W . ~. ~r a ~~,c~ cJ ~,,,,..,a , ~ ~.~.-~ S The above action was adopted on motion of W ~ n1 SDK e~ and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: MD.hGi~`r, t,~J.Naikcat~ C'1otC~o~.l ,'0.o~;r-,Sd~, , 1~1.1k NAYS : N u ~ e. ABSENT: N~aa Respectfully s ted, t Secr tart', Roano e County Planning Commission ~g9_ ~ PE~`ITIONER: ROANOKE COUN'PY PLANNING FISSION CASE 28-6/89 Planning Commission Hearing Date: June 6, 1989 and August 1, 1989 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: August 22, 1989 A. RFX2UEST Petition of Roanoke County Planning ao essf om Rural dPreserve to Princ pal map designation of approximately 10 Industrial, located at the northeast corner of the intersection of 16th Street and Carlisle Avenue in the Vinton Magisterial District. B. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION There was no one present in opposition to the request. C, SIGNIFICANT IMPACT FACTORS 1. None. D. PRO~FRFD CONDITIONS 1. Not applicable. E, ISSIONER'S MOTION, WTE AND REASON The motion Mr. Robinson moved to approve the amendment to the Land Use Plan map. carried with the following roll call vote: AYES; Massey, Winstead, Gordon, Robinson, Witt NAYS: None ABSENT; None F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE None. G . ATTACEIl`~ENTS Concept Plan (8~" x 11") X Vicinity Map (8~" x 11") X Staff Report Other A Jon, rtley, Al mate Secretary Roa ke County Planning Ccnunission i-- i D a ~nQTu ., „..... c~~C.R~'fAR`( of PiANN~y~~ Cu 1.n,A ~'S~i~~ ROANOKE COUNTY 2 ~vFCA.L YE;~SE~E Tv YFt~ac~Qs.L DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT za° ~~t~`a i ~t~9- s. M E M O R A E D U M T0~ Roanoke County Planning Commission FROIi: Dale Castellow ^~ 3UBJSCT~ Land Use Map Amendment Continued from June 6, 1989 DATB~ August 1, 1989 You ~aay recall that in February of this year the Board of Supervisors approved a request to rezone a 3.75 acre parcel, situated at the northeast corner of 16th Street and Carlisle Avenue, from RE, Residential Estates to M-2, Industrial. Pursuant to this rezoning, the Secretary of the Planning Commission is requesting an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map. This matter was originally placed on the Commission's agenda for June 6, 1989. It was continued until staff could readvertise the appropriate acreage. The reasons for this amendment include the following: (1) The property in question abuts several acres of unimproved agricultural land. When the Fututre Land Use Plan was prepared this site also Was unimproved. The site is now zoned and actively used as a concrete product ~eanufacturing facility. (2) Altough the site abuts both recreational and residential land uses, the general area (including parcels within the City of Roanoke) is developed with co~aercial and light industrial uses. ?he fact that residential uses abut the site does not preclude it fros industrial uses. ?be Principal Industrial land use category can be compatible with residential land uses if appropriate measures are used to mitigate any adverse iepacts. Properties abutting this parcel from the east are designated as Rural Preserve. The City planning staff advises that those parcels situated in the City west of this site are appropriately zoned and designated in the land use plan for couercial and light industrial land uses. In considering this amendment, the staff evaluated the land use determinants for Principal Industrial areas set forth in the Comprehensive Plan. These land use determinants include (1) Existing Land Use Pattern: As previously discussed, several parcels in this vicinity are used as commercial and light industrial land uses. - 3 - ~~ ~_ ~ (2) Existing Zoninq~ At least two parcels Generals) situated in the County are zoned M-2, Industrial. Several additional parcels located in the City are also zoned for industrial uses. (3) Potential Industrial Sites: The site is actively being developed as an expansion to an existing concrete product production facility. (4) Employment Centers: This area does not constitute an employment center. .. (5) beingrconsideredrforrthedlandtusepanendmentaisa predominantly flat. (6) Flood Hazard Prvention: The site is situated outside of the floodplain. (,) notouose anytthreat toelocalmnaturaltresourcesshould p (8) Water Supply: Adequate water supply is available. (9) Sewer Service: Adequate sewer service is available. (10) Access: Although several concerns regarding access through adjoining residential areas have been raised, alternative access routes away from neighboring residences are available. (11) Urban Sector: The site urban service sector. urban reserve area. is not situated within the It is located within the Your review and recom~endation regarding this land use amendment is appreciated. - 4 - ' A~"~~1'P OF THE RQANOKE COUNTY LAND USE PLAN Before the Board of Supervisors of ~~~ ~ A +, 10 ~noke County: - acre parcel of land, generall y located at the northeast corner of 16th Street and Carlisle Avenue Magisterial District within the Vinton and recorded as parcel # 70.11-1-21, 22, 20,21.1,23 Roanoke County Tax Records. in the PETITION To the Honorable Supervisors of Roanoke County: SEAS, Your Petitioner Secretary of Roanoke Count P respectfully files th1S Y lamming Commission petition in accordance with the Code of VA of 1950, as amended and would respectfull show Y the following: l) The Petitioner owns the above referenced 2) The property. Property iS designated Rural Preserve Land Use Guide of the Roanoke Count C in the Future 3) Your Petitioner now desires to redesi~te ensive Development Plan. Principal Industrial g this pr°p~'tY as Respec ly submi ~~ `_ .~ ~~~ -ec- . Petitioner V ~~_ a C/ ~ WHEREAS, the ~~~~ petitioner was referred to the Planning Ccmn.ission, which after Proper legal notice required by Section 15.1-431 of the Code of Vir in' as amended, held a public hearing on Augu~~ ~, 1989 g is of 1950, interested persons were afforded an o Whereas all Commission recor~enends to the Coun PPortunity to be heard. The Planning ty Board of Supervisors that the above referenced parcel Of land be redesignated from Rural Preserve Principal Industrial t0 in the Future Land Use Guide of the Roanoke County C~rehensive Develo pment Plan on the following recorded `A~~ Massey, iainstead, Gordon, Robinson, Witt vote: Motion of K. Robinson NAYS: None ABSENT: None Respec fully ~ ~ • t ~~ 'c~"l'~ ~ r, , , thry, Roano a County planning Crnmission ACTION # ITEM NUMBER ~ / AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD COUNTYEADMINISTRATION CENTER COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE MEETING DATE: August 22, 1989 AGENDA ITEM: First Reading of Ordinance amending Article III, Sewer Use StandardsCode Chapter 16 of the Roanoke County COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND: The 1972 Sewage Treatment Agreement between Roano~eo City and Roanoke County requires the County adopt such ordinances and regulaof1ORoanoket as nthey to those adopted by the City pertain to Sewer Use Standards. The County of Roanoke adopted Ordinance 6-24-86-146 oni ements. 1986 in order to meet the above requ' Recent requirements by the State Water Control Board and the Uthe. Cit 1 of Roanoke to eamend theirySewer required Y Use Standards. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Attached is the proposed amendment to the Roanoke County Sewer esec nforms sto thereCity~lof d Roanoke our Ordinanc Ordinance. The am if icant effect oon 1 seweru usenwi hi Roanoke a sign County. ALTERNATIVES AND IMPACTS: There is no practical alternative to adopting this Ordinance. Adoption is required by the 1972 Sewage Treatment Agreement. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the first reading of this Ordinance be held August 22, 1989• It is further recommendedetscheduled fordSeptemberd12t11989f the Ordinance b APPROVED: ~ / SUBMITTED BY: ~ ~~,~, ~7 P.E. Elmer C. Hodge Clifford a~g. County Administrator Utility Di ctor ACTION Approved ( ) Motion by: Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to VOTE No Yes Abs Garrett Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers _T AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, AUGUST 22, 1989 ORDINANCE AMENDING AND REENACTING ORDINANCE 62486-146, "SEWER USE STANDARDS" OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE, BY AMENDING AND REENACTING CERTAIN EXISTING PROVISIONS AND ENACTING NEW PROVISIONS TO IMPROVE AND INCREASE PROTECTIVE PROGRAMS WHEREAS, the City of Roanoke owns and operates the Roanoke Regional Treatment Plant; and WHEREAS, Roanoke County is a user of the Roanoke Regional Treatment Plant and is required to establish and enforce a pretreatment program as required by the United States Environmental Protection Agency; and WHEREAS, the 1972 Sewage Treatment Agreement between Roanoke City and Roanoke County requires the County to adopt such ordinances and regulations to conform to those of the City as required by EPA; and WHEREAS, Chapter 18 of the recently recodified Roanoke County Code (1985) incorporates the provisions of Chapter 16 of the 1971 Roanoke County Code; and WHEREAS, this ordinance amends Ordinance 62486-146 adopted on June 24, 1986, in order to meet the requirements of the State Water Control Board, the EPA, and the aforesaid agreement; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on August 22, 1989; the second reading of this ordinance was held on September 12, 1989. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of 1 Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That Article III. Chapter 16 of the Roanoke County Code of 1971 (Chapter 18 of the Roanoke County Code of 1985) be, and hereby is, amended and reenacted to read and provide as follows: Chapter 16. Article III. Sewer Use Standards Sec. 16-44. Definitions. For the purpose of this article, the words and phrases set out in this section shall have the following meanings: sewer. Industrial user - Any g~3~} user of publicly owned treatment works identif 19 7 Office of Management and Budgetl Classification Manual, ~~ under divisions A, B, D, E, and I, as amended and supplemented, includin overnmental facilities that dischar e wastewater to the plant. plant's VPDES permit. National categorical pretreatment stands odluta n edischarge standard means any regulations containing p limits promulgated by the EPA in accordance with Sections 307 (b) and (c) of the Act (33 U.S.C. 33~4-'~ 1317) and 40 C F R Subchapter u (Parts 401-471) as amended, which applies to a specific category of industrial users. y y ~ ~ Sec. 16-45. General Requirements. (a) All discharges into public sewers shall conform to requirements of this artin a standards imposed by the st t owater pretreatment standards or a y 2 the plant's VPD~S perml~. control board or its successor in authority are hereby incorporated by reference where applicable and where such standards are ~~ more stringent than those set forth in this article. ~gl In the event of an emergency, as determined by the approving authority the approving authority shall be authorized to immediately halt any actual or threatened discharge. ~h1 A person discharging in violation of the provisions of this article within thirty (30) days of the date of such dischar e shall sam le anal ze and submit the data to the approving authority unless the approving authority elects to perform such sampling. Sec. 16-52. Discharge of substances capable of imairing, etc. facilities. ig1 No person shall discharge into the public sewers pollutants which cause interference or pass through. ~_ No person shall discharge into the public sewers ollutants with a hi h flow rate or concentration of conventional pollutants as to interfere with the plant. Sec. 16-53. Right to require pretreatment and control of, or to reject discharges. ~c1 No erson shall utilize dilution as a means of treatment. Sec. 16-56. Measurement, sampling, etc., and report of discharges. (b) Unless otherwise provided, each measurement, test, sampling, or analysis required to be made~her~eunder shall be made in accordance with t-h uy ~ u~.. ` LT l ~ b. T ~ L. T ~ T T J- .+ ~.. T.Te Y_~g ~r~-~p3~ ~ ego==, Part 136, as amended. (e) Samples shall be taken every hour, properly refrigerated and composited in proportion to the flow for a representative twenty-four (24) hour sample. For oil and grease, pH, phenols, cyanide volatile toxic organic and other appropriate pollutants, property grab sampling shall be performed. Such sampling shall be repeated on as many days as necessary to insure representative quantities for the entire reporting period. Industrial plants with wide fluctuations in quantities of wastes shall provide an automatic sampler paced automatically by the flow-measuring device. 3 ~_ All owners of facilities governed by this article shall comgly with the applicable requirements of 40 C.F.R. 403.12, as ~ a Y111 Vlly Kr ~ra~~+. ..~~-~~~ -- requirements of 40 C F R 403 12(c) (d) (i) and (1). All records shall be retained for a minimum of three years and this retention period shall be extended during litigation or upon rectuest of the approving authority. Sec. 16-57. Discharge permits for industrial waste. (a) The County may, in its sole discretion, grant a non- transferable permit to discharge to industrial users who meet the criteria of this chapter, provided that the industry: (5) Complies with the requirements of federal categorical standards, where applicable, including the development of any required compliance schedules or the applicable provisions of this article. ~1 The approving authority shall have the right to accept or rei ect and increases in flow or pollutants under existing or new permits. Sec. 16-64. Right of entry to enforce article. (a) The approving authority and other duly authorized employees of the county bearing proper credentials and identification shall be authorized to enter any public or private property at any reasonable time for the purpose of enforcing this article for sampling purposes inspect monitoring equipment and to inspect and copy all documents relevant to the enforcement of this article including, without limitation, monitorina reports. Anyone acting under this authority shall observe the establishment's rules and regulations concerning safety, internal security, and fire protection. j~ Appropriate information submitted to the approving authority pursuant to these regulations excluding any information utilized in determine effluent limits may be claimed as confidential by the submitter at the time of submission by stamping the words "confidential business information" on each page containing such information If a claim is asserted, the information shall be treated in accordance with applicable law. Sec. 16-66. Notice of violations. The County shall serve persons discharging in violation of this article with written notice stating the nature of the violation and y lCad.]~'Le.~~GY~re~~-e {rll V 1 1 6+2' 4 rectuirincl immediate satisfactory compliance. The approving authority shall have the authority to publish annually in the Roanoke Times and World News Newspaper or a newspaper of general circulation in the Roanoke area a list of persons which were not in compliance with the terms of this Article at least once during the twelve (12) previous months. Sec. 16-67. Penalty for violations. ~~{{ ~j~ Z~^ GV V1Vll 1 , ~-e~--e~ae~--a~~-e~--~a~e3-a~~e~--a~~-€e~-e~e~r- ~ y~ '.9 t'1Z'RT1~TR30LC-Gl'r ~a1 A person who violates the provisions of this article shall be guilty of a class 1 misdemeanor and upon conviction is punishable b~ a fine of one thousand dollars (S1 000) per violation per day and confinement in fail for not more than twelve months, either or both In the event of a violation, the approving authority shall also have the right to terminate the sewer and water connection. (b) In addition to proceeding under authority of sub-section (a) of this section, the county is entitled to pursue all other criminal and civil remedies to which it is entitled under authority of state statutes or other ordinances of the county against a person continuing prohibited discharges, including, without limitation, inj unctive relief. Sec. 16-69. Public access to data. Effluent data complied as Dart of the approving authority's pretreatment program shall be available to the public. 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after October 1, 1989. 5 Item No. ~ ~- AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER IN ROANOKE, VA ON TUESDAY, MEETING DATE: August 22, 1989 SUBJECT: Purchase of .47+ acres in Southwest Industrial Park COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ,~~~ ~ , ~~~~-,,~-r~ ,~ SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Mr. Timothy J. Thielecke has made an offer to purchase .47+ acres in the Southwest Industrial Park. Because of the location and the number of easements (note attached map), the property is being sold for $11,750. Mr. Thielecke plans to build a 2,500 square foot facility. FISCAL IMPACT' The County will pay estimated surveying costs of $350 associated with the sale of said property. Estimated annual tax revenue is $1,100. RECOMMENDATION BY THE STAFF: 1. That the Board approve the purchase of this land; 2. Approve the payment of the estimated survey costs of $350 associated with this sale; and, 3. Authorize the County Administator to execute all necessary documents upon approval by the County Attorney. SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED: ;;1 ~4 ~~ .-z~1~ t,() ~ t~' Timot y W. G bala, Director Elmer C. Hodge, Jr. Economic Development County Administator --------------------------------------------------------------- Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by: ACTION No Yes Abs Garrett Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers va . ,~ SOUTHjaEST INDUSTRIAL PARK ROANOKE COUNTY PROPERTY FOR SALE DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT _. _ T ~- AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, AUGUST 22, 1989 ORDINANCE ACCEPTING AN OFFER FOR AND AUTHORIZ- ING THE SALE OF .47 ACRE, MORE OR LESS, IN THE SOUTHWEST INDUSTRIAL PARK BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.01 of the Charter of Roanoke County, the subject property has been declared to be surplus and is being made available for other public uses, i.e. economic development; and 2. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading was held on August 22, 1989; and a second reading was held on September 12, 1989, concern- ing the sale and disposition of .47 acre, more or less, in the Southwest Industrial Park; and 3. That offers having been received for said property, the offer of Timothy J. Thielecke to purchase .47 acre, more or less, for $11,750 is hereby accepted and all other offers are rejected; and 4. That all proceeds from the sale of this real estate are to be allocated to the capital reserves of the County; and 5. That the County Administrator is authorized to execute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County as are necessary to accomplish the conveyance of said property, all of which shall be upon form approved by the County Attorney. Item No . -' ~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT IN ROANOKE, VA ON TUESDAY, MEETING DATE: August 22, 1989 SUB_ T. Purchase of 5.039± acres in Southwest Industrial Park COUNTY ADMINISTATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Mr. Gorman Howell and Mr. Sidney Maupin, Jr. have made an offer to purchase a 5.039+ acre t ort 144t872.ouMessrs I Howell and Maupinhe property is being sold f $ are feet plan to build four structures of 10,000 to 25,000 squ during the next 24 months•ion com aniesctorloc to in the Countyl manufacturing and distribut P FISCAL IMPACT' The sale of the property will provide $18,897 ~$1 which should $125,975 being returned to the Higginbotham family) be returned to the Southwest Industrial Park project for road and utility improvements. BACKGROUND' As noted on the Southwest Industrial Park map, this property is adjacent to the Roanoke Ready Mix site which is available for sale. the In order for Messrs. Howell and Maup extendinglthe road to the end road will have to be extended. By of the property it will and asewe d til~i ies shouldebe ext ndedady Mix site. County water '~ 3 RECOMMENDATION' 1. The staff recommends that the sale of the 5.09± acre tract be approved for Gorman Howell and Sidney Maupin; and, 2. Staff recommends that the County Administrator authorize the staff to prepare plans and profiles to extend the road and water and sewer through the site at an estimated cost of $23,500. These funds will come from the project balance of $4, 565 plus $19, 361 profit from the sale of the property to Gorman Howell and the pending sale of 0.47 acres to Tim Thielecke. A future report will be brought to the Board prior to the second reading, to authorize the utilities and County participation in the road extensions in the project. SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED: ~ ~ i=` ~ ~~ ~~ Timo by W. Bala, Director Elmer C. Hodge, Jr. Economic Development County Administator ------------------------------- ACTION No Yes Abs Approved Denied Received Referred to ( ) Motion by: ( ) ( ) Garrett Johnson McGraw Nickens ~---3 EziSTiNG y9 CJ ,~ • ~~9 BUILDING S RACT III A ~~ •, TRACT III 8 ~ S 1.00 AC. ~ ~ 6.41 AC. ~ \ ~ ` 1 ~i i ~ ~ ~E~ ~~P~~ ~4 v E- cj Y ewsriNG 1T~ ~ i i ~ ~ ` TRACT I sU1LDMIG ~.~ ' ° ~ 3.00 AC. i'o ~ /~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ i,~~ a ~ i ~~~ 10 ~ _ _ _ _ - _ - - - _ ~C _ _ __ __ _ _ . ---r -i .ti '~ ,. SOUTHWEST I~dDUSTRIAL PARK ROANOKE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT PROPERTY FOR SALE ,, AT A REGULAR MEETIN VIRGINIA, HELD ATOTHEHROANOKE COUNTYEADMINISTRATIONNCENTEOUNTY, TUESDAY, AUGUST 22, 1989 R' ORDINANCE ACCEPTING AN OFFER FOR AND AUTHORIZ- ING THE SALE OF 5.039 ACRES, MORE OR LESS, IN THE SOUTHWEST INDUSTRIAL PARK BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.01 of the Charter of Roanoke County, the subject property has been declared to be surplus and is being made available for other public uses, i.e. economic development; and 2. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading was held on August 22, 1989; and a second reading was held on September 12, 1989, concern- ing the sale and disposition of 5.039 acres, more or less, in the Southwest Industrial Park; and 3• That offers having been received for said property, the offer of Gorman Howell and Sidney Maupin Jr. to purchase 5.039 acres, more or less, for $144,872 is hereby accepted and all other offers are rejected; and 4• That all proceeds from the sale of this real estate are to be allocated to the capital reserves of the County. The expenditure of a portion of these proceeds for road and utility improvements to Southwest Industrial Park is hereby authorized; and 5• That the County Administrator is authorized to execute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County as are necessary to accomplish the conveyance of said property, all of which shall be upon form approved by the County Attorney. 4 q-~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, AUGUST 22, 1989 ORDINANCE 82289-11 AUTHORIZING CONVEYANCE OF RIGHTS-OF-WAY IN HOLLINS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROJECT FOR ACCEPTANCE INTO STATE SECONDARY SYSTEM WHEREAS, certain parcels of real estate located in Botetourt County, Virginia, were deeded to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, in order to permit the widening and improvements of two roads as part of the "Hollins Community Development Project" financed in part by Roanoke County, Virginia; and WHEREAS, for the portions of these two roads lying in Botetourt County, Virginia, it is necessary that the rights-of- way and easements for said roads be deeded to the Board of Supervisors of Botetourt County, Virginia, as a condition for the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) accepting these roads into the Virginia Secondary road system. THEREFORE, be it ordained by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1• That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Charter of the County of Roanoke, a first reading concerning the conveyance of the hereinafter-described real estate was held on August 8, 1989. A second reading on this matter was held on August 22, 1989. The real estate involved consists of eleven (11) parcels of land located in Botetourt County, Virginia, and previously conveyed to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, by various land owners for the purpose of improving two roads. 2. That Parcels 30, 31, 33, 34, 35, 42, 43, 44, 46, 47, and 48 as shown on a set of plans entitled "Hollins Community Development Project" located in the office of the Roanoke County Department of Public Facilities are hereby authorized and approved to be conveyed to the Board of Supervisors of Botetourt County, Virginia, for the purpose of acceptance of Roads "B" and "C" in this project unto the State Secondary System of the Virginia Department of Transportation. 3. That the County Administrator is authorized to execute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County as are necessary to accomplish the conveyance of this property, all of which shall be upon form approved by the County Attorney. On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor Nickens, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisor Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Mary H. llen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Paul Mahoney, County Attorney John Willey, Director, Real Estate Assessment Phillip Henry, Director, Engineering Arnold Covey, Director, Development & Inspections and copy for Virginia Department of Transportation ACTION NO. ITEM NO. - AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: August 22, 1989 AGENDA ITEM: Hollins Project - Conveyance to Botetourt County of Right-of-Ways for inclusion in State Secondary System COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: As part of the road improvements undertaken by the Hollins Community Development Project, eleven (11) parcels of land physically located in Botetourt County were conveyed by adjacent property owners to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors. In order that Roads "B" and "C" can be accepted into the State Secondary System, Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) is requiring that the right-of-ways for these two roads be deeded to Botetourt County. Three of the parcels are physically located in Botetourt County but were carried on the Roanoke County tax records. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the conveyance of these parcels to Botetourt County so that these roads can be accepted into the State Secondary System by VDOT. Respectfully submitted, ~ Y ~ ~ ~V~ Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney No Yes Ans Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by Garrett Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers r~- i AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, AUGUST 22, 1989 ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING CONVEYANCE OF RIGHTS-OF- WAY IN HOLLINS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROJECT FOR ACCEPTANCE INTO STATE SECONDARY SYSTEM WHEREAS, certain parcels of real estate located in Botetourt County, Virginia, were deeded to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, in order to permit the widening and improvements of two roads as part of the "Hollins Community Development Project" financed in part by Roanoke County, Virginia; and WHEREAS, for the portions of these two roads lying in Botetourt County, Virginia, it is necessary that the rights-of-way and easements for said roads be deeded to the Board of Supervisors of Botetourt County, Virginia, as a condition for the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) accepting these roads into the Virginia Secondary road system. THEREFORE, be it ordained by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Charter of the County of Roanoke, a first reading concerning the conveyance of the hereinafter-described real estate was held on August 8, 1989. A second reading on this matter was held on August 22, 1989. The real estate involved consists of eleven (11) parcels of land located in Botetourt County, Virginia, and previously conveyed to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, by various land owners for the purpose of improving two roads. 2. That Parcels 30, 31, 33, 34, 35, 42, 43, 44, 46, 47, and ~_i 48 as shown on a set of plans entitled "Hollins Community Development Project" located in the office of the Roanoke County Department of Public Facilities are hereby authorized and approved to be conveyed to the Board of Supervisors of Botetourt County, Virginia, for the purpose of acceptance of Roads "B" and "C" in this project unto the State Secondary System of the Virginia Department of Transportation. 3. That the County Administrator is authorized to execute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County as are necessary to accomplish the conveyance of this property, all of which shall be upon form approved by the County Attorney. r ~ ~~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROAN"~~/O"KE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, AUGUST 22, 1989 ORDINANCE 82289-12 AUTHORIZING DEDICATION OF COUNTY WELL LOTS FOR BENEFIT OF DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH WHEREAS, the County of Roanoke owns certain well lots which its Department of Utilities is desirous of putting into service for the County's water system; and WHEREAS, prior to issuing a permit for the operation of any well by a locality the Department of Health requires that said lot be dedicated exclusively for use as a well lot and not for human habitation or other activity which might pose a danger of contamination to that source of water. THEREFORE, be it ordained by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading on the dedication of the hereinafter-described real estate was held on August 8, 1989. A second reading on this matter was held on August 22, 1989. 2. That the dedication of the following well lots exclusively for water supply use and to the exclusion of human habitation or other sources of contamination is hereby authorized and approved. (1) Fairway Forest Estates, Section 2, Deed Book 1287, pages 810-811. (2) Arlington Hills Well Lot #3, Lot 12, Block 5, Map of Arlington Hills, Deed Book 1044, page 824. (3) Arlington Hills Well Lot #4, Lot 19, Block 1, Section 2, Map of Layman Lawn, Deed Book 1044, page 823. (4) Bonsack Well Lot, 0.43 acres abutting on Virginia Secondary Route 758, Deed Book 1285, pages 1521- 1522. 3• That the County Administrator is authorized to execute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County as are necessary to accomplish the dedications of these well lots, all of which shall be upon form approved by the County Attorney. On motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by Supervisor Robers, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisor Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: ~• Mary H. Allen, Clerk cc• File Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Paul Mahoney, County Attorney John Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator Cliff Craig, Director, Utilities Dr. Margaret Hagan, Director, Health Department Phillip Henry, Director, Engineering - ACTION NO. AT A REGU ITEM NO. ~ -2i LAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINI MEETING DATE• ST~I'ION CENTER August 22, 1989 AGENDA ITEM: Well Lot Dedications Department of Health COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND: Virginia Department of Health regulations require t being used by a local government as hat parcels a public water system be a location of Such a dedication or restrictiveacovenant mu t be r a well lot for deed records before the Department of Health y to that purpose. for the localities use of an ecorded with the Y well, will issue a permit SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Department of Utilities currently has the fo lots which it is prepared to put into service water system: llowing four with the County~s 1• Fairway Forest Estates, Section 2, Deed Book 810-811. 1287 pages 2• Arlington Hills Well Arlington Hills Lot #3, Lot 12, Block 5, Ma of Deed Book 1044, page 824, p 3• Arlington Hills Well Lot Map of Layman Lawn, Deed Book 044g' Block 1, Section 2, page 823. 4• Bonsack Well Secondary RouteL758 0.43 acres abuttin Deed Book 1285 g °n Virginia Board action is needed to ~ page 1521-1522. dedication for the authorize the conveyance of this these wells ma benefit of the Department of Health so that y be put into operation. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board concur in the d these well lots. edication of Respectfully subm' ~ ~~ ,.--_ fitted, ~~ , ~~(°~ 75~~ Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney Action APProved Vote Denied ~ ~ Motion by No Yes Abs Received ( , Garrett Referred ~ ~ Johnson to McGraw -~ Nickens Robers AT A REGULAR MEETING OF COUNTY, VIRGINIA THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ROANOKE TUESDAY, AUGUST 22 ADMINISTRATION CENTER, 1989 ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING WELL LOTS FOR BENEFIT OF DEp ATION OF COUNTY ARTMENT OF HEALTH WHEREAS, the Count y of Roanoke owns certain well lots which its Department of Utilities is desirous of the Count ~ Putting into service for Y s water system; and WHEREAS, prior to issuing a permit for the operation of an well by a localit y y the Department of Health requires that said 1 be dedicated exclusivel of Y for use as a well lot and not for human habitation or other activity which contamination to that source of Ovate might pose a danger of r. THEREFORE, be it ordained b Roanoke Count y the Board of Supervisors of Y, Virginia, as follows: 1• That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Charter of Roanoke County, a first readin hereinafter-described real estate was he °n the dedication of the ld on August 8, 1989, A second readin g on this matter was held on 2. August 22, 1989. That the dedication of the followin exclusively for water g well lots supply use and to the exclusion of human habitation or other sources of contaminatio and approved. n is hereby authorized ~1) Fairway Forest Estates, Section 2, Deed pages 810- Book 1287, 811. ~2) Arlington Hills Well Lot #3, Lot 12 of Arlin ton ~ Block 5, Map g Hills, Deed Book 1044 (3) Arlington Hills Well Lot ~ page 824. #4, Lot 19, Block 1~ 9-~ Section 2, Map of Layman Lawn, Deed Book 1044, page 823. (4) Bonsack Well Lot, 0.43 acres abutting on Virginia Secondary Route 758, Deed Book 1285, pages 1521- 1522. 3. That the County Administrator is authorized to execute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County as are necessary to accomplish the dedications of these well lots, all of which shall be upon form approved by the County Attorney. ,a AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY , VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 22, 1989 RESOLUTION 82289-1_~ CERTIFYING EXECUTIVE MEETING WAS HELD IN CONFORMITY WITH THE CODE OF VIRGINIA WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia has convened an executive meeting on this date pursuant to an affirmative recorded vote and in accordance with the provisions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and WHEREAS, Section 2.1-344.1 of the Code of Virginia requires a certification by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia that such executive meeting were conducted in conformity with Virginia Law. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia hereby certifies that, to the best of each members knowledge: 1. Only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements by Virginia law were discussed in the executive meeting which this certification resolution applies, and 2. Only such public business matters as were identified in the motion convening the executive meeting were heard, discussed or considered by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. The Executive Session held during the evening session was certified on motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor Nickens, and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None A COPY TESTS: ~- Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors CC: File Executive Session File ~ AN ,~.~ -, _ p a 18 ~~ 88 $~'sQU1CENTENN~P~ A Bcnuti~ulBcginning COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE T0: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: (4nunfg of ~Rnttnake BOARD OF SUPERVISORS M E M O RAN D U M Diane Hyatt Director of Finance ~v Mary Allen Clerk to the Board September 13, 1989 LEE GARRETT. CHAIRMAN WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT RICHARD W. ROBERS. VICE-CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON NOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT ..- STEVEN A. MCGRAW CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VIN TON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT Appropriation from Board Contingency Fund On August 22, 1989, the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors on motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor McGraw voted to appropriate $9,000 from the Board Contingency Fund for an informational brochure for the Police Department referendum. Please make the necessary appropriation. mha P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 2 4018-07 9 8 (703) 772-2004 -" ,.~,. ~ (iOANp~ O F ti •~ 2 ~ ~ , 2 J a r[5a 88 SFSQUICENTENN~P~' A Bcauti~ul Bcginning COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE ~ ~ ~" (~~~trt~~ n~ ~~v~tnn~h~ August 29, 1989 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS LEE GARRETT. CHAIRMAN WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT RICHARD W. ROBERS. VICE-CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL OISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT STEVEN A. MCGRAW CATAW BA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VIN TON MAGIS TE. RIAL DISTRICT The Honorable Dudley J. Emick, Jr. P. O. Box 158 Fincastle, Virginia 24090 Dear Mr. Emick: Attached is Resolution 82289-1 of support for the Western Regional Forensic Science Laboratory which was approved at the August 22, 1989, Board of Supervisors Meeting. Dr. A. W. Tiedemann, Director, Division of Consolidated Laboratories, and staff made an impressive presentation concerning the new facility. A request for funding of the new facility will be placed on the Governor's Budget this fall, and if approved, construction could start as early as next Spring. The Regional Laboratory will contain the Medical Examiner's Office, and Forensic, Microbiology and Chemistry Laboratories. This will be the first multifunctional regional laboratory in Virginia, and will be of great benefit to the entire Roanoke Valley as well as the entire southwest part of the state. Your support of this project will be greatly appreciated. Sincerely, ~.~..~ ~ - Lee Garrett, Chairman Roanoke County Board of Supervisors LG/bjh Attachment cc: Dr. A. W. Tiedemann Members, Roanoke County Board of Supervisors PO E30X 2~J80<~ I~C>ANOKE. VIFZGINIA 24018-0198 - (703> 772 2004 ~::i:. ... tr \ ~ ~ :.r:. Letter sent to: The Honorable Dudley J. Emick, Jr. The Honorable C. Richard Cranwell The Honorable G. Steven Agee The Honorable Clifton Woodrum The Honorable A. Victor Thomas The Honorable J. Granger Macfarlane The Honorable Noel C. Taylor cc: Clerk, Roanoke City Council The Honorable Charles R. Hill cc: Clerk, Vinton Town Council The Honorable James Taliaferro cc: Clerk, Salem City Council The Honorable Webster E. Booze, Jr. cc: Clerk, Botetourt Board cc: Dr. A. W. Tiedemann Members, Roanoke County Board of Supervisors OF ROAN ,~,~ ti a= ~ ~~ ~~~~~~~e ~~~~ ,~ ~ ~s O ss SFSQUICENTENN~P~ A BcautifulBtginninp, COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE August 24, 1989 Mr. Mark A. Williams Assistant City Attorney City of Roanoke 464 Municipal Building Roanoke, Virginia 24011-1595 Dear Mr. Williams: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS LEE GARRETT. CHAIRMAN WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT RICHARD W. ROBERS. VICE-CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT STEVEN A. MCGRAW CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT Attached. is a copy of Resolution No. 82289-3 authorizing the Roanoke Regional Cable Television Committee to conduct public hearings. This resolution was adopted by the Board of Supervisors at their meeting on Tuesday, August 22, 1989. If you need further information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, .~/ • C.~C.! c~~ Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors bjh Attachment cc: Paul Mahoney, Roanoke County Attorney Frank Selbe, III, Vinton Town Attorney P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24018-0798 (703) 772-2004 O~ POAN ,`.~ L ti 9 Z z v a 18 ~~ 88 sFSQU1CEN7ENN~P`. A Bcauti(ul Beginning COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE August 24, 1989 Mr. F. C. Altizer, Jr. Resident Engineer Virginia Department of Transportaton P. O. Box 3071 Salem, Va 24153-3071 Dear Mr. Altizer: LEE GARRETT. CHAIRMAN WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT RICHARD W. ROBERS. VICE-CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT STEVEN A. MCGRAW CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT Attached is a copy of Resolution No. 82289-11 authorizing conveyance of rights-of-way in Hollins Community stem lopThis Project for acceptance into the state secondary y resolution was adopted by the Board of Supervisors at their meeting on Tuesday, August 22, 1989. If you need further information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, bjh Attachment C~n~tn~~ v~ ~uttnnk~ BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ~' Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors P.O. BOX 29800 RUANOKE. VIRGINIA 2 4018-07 9 8 • (703) 772-2004 O~ FiOANpA.~ ~ ~ ~. Z ~~ ~ 2 v 'a 18 E50 88 SFSQVICENTENN~P~ A Beauti~ul Beginning COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE TO: FROM: DATE: (~oitnt~ of ~Rnttnuk~e M E M O R A N D U M Members, Board of Si '~~ Bob L. Johnson ~ , August 18, 1989 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS LEE GARRET I . CHAIRMAN WIN USUR HILLS MAGIS TEf+I~L DISTF?IC:I RICHARD W. ROBERS. VICE-CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON H(~L LINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT STEVEN A. MCGRAW' ATAWBA MAGISTERIAL. DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VIN TC)N MAG ISTF RIAL DI~~T RIOT SUBJECT: STORM WATER MANAGEMENT As I write this memo, the heavens are once again opening up, small stream advisories are in effect for the entire va11:Qy, and many of our constituents are once again left with that "queasy" feeling. Will they or will they not have water in their basements when they get home from work this afternoon? Obviously, we cannot correct all of the problems affecting our neighbors, but I openly wonder if we have done enough in the area of storm water management. Together, we have taken many bold and even innovative steps these past four years. Certainly our actions in establishing strict standards for development will prevent many of our flooding problems from worsening. However, our efforts to correct past deficiencies seem somewhat feeble. The weather patterns of this past spring and summer have merely heightened our awareness of the seriousness of the problems facing us. Simply put, our $200,000 drainage problem can be likened to the childhood story of the young man trying to plug the dike with his finger. Certainly, we have too many leaks and not enough fingers. I will, therefore, propose for discussion on Tuesday, August 22, 1989, the possibility of a countywide referendum for a more effective storm water management program. Several things seem obvious at this time. First, the federal and state governments will be of little assistance. Therefore, any redress to this problem must come locally. Secondly, drainage problems do not respect artificial district or municipal boundaries. It would, therefore, seem prudent to begin valleywide discussions on solutions to these problems immediately. I look forward to meaningful discussions with you on Tuesday. BLJ/bjh cc: Elmer Hodge PO. BOX 29800 F~OANC)KE. VIRGINIA 24018-0 198 (703) 7722004 OF POANp~~ ti 'A A Z z v a ~ 8 E50 $$ sFSQU1CENTENN~P~' A Beauti~ul8eginning C~n~tnt~ of ~v~tnvk~e BOARD OF SUPERVISORS COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR August 21, 1989 ELMER C. HODGE Ms. Catherine Fusco 5655 Penguin Drive, S.W. Roanoke, Virginia 24018 Dear Ms. Fusco: LEE GARRETT. CHAIRMAN WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT RICHARD W. ROBERS. VICE-CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT STEVEN A. MCGRAW CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VIN TON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT At their regular meeting on Tuesday, August 22, 1989., the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors unanimously approved the request of the Penn Forest Elementary School PTA for a raffle permit. The raffle will be conducted on October 28, 1989. The fee has been paid and your receipt is enclosed. You may consider this letter to be your permit, and I suggest it be displayed on the premises where the raffle is to be conducted. The State Code provides that raffle and bingo permits be issued on a calendar-year basis and such permits issued will expire on December 31, 1989. This permit, however, is only valid on the date specified in your application. If I may be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me at 772-2004. Sincerely, Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisor bjh Enclosures cc: Commissioner of the Revenue Commonwealth Attorney County Treasurer PO BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 2 4018-0 19 8 (703) 772-2004 of aonrvo~.~ h 2 p t7 ~ J 2 a 18 ~.~ 88 SFSQUICENTENN~P~ A Beautiful Bcginning C~n~tn~~ of ~nttnvke BOARD OF SUPERVISORS COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR August 21, 1989 ELMER C. HODGE Ms. Vivian Holdren 532 Water Oak Road Roanoke, Virginia 24019 Dear Ms. Holdren: LEE GARRETT. CHAIRMAN WIN USOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT RICHARD W. ROBERS. VICE-CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT STEVEN A. MCGRAW CATAW BA MAGISTERIAL. DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VIN TON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT At their regular meeting on Tuesday, August 22, 19.89, the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors unanimously approved the request of the Northside Athletic Booster Club for a raffle permit. The raffle will be conducted on October 6, 1989. The fee has been paid and your receipt is enclosed. You may consider this letter to be your permit, and I suggest it be displayed on the premises where the raffle is to be conducted. The State Code provides that raffle and bingo permits be issued on a calendar-year basis and such permits issued will expire on December 31, 1989. This permit, however, is only valid on the date specified in your application. If I may be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me at 772-2004. Sincerely, ~` Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisor bjh Enclosures cc: Commissioner of the Revenue Commonwealth Attorney County Treasurer PO. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 2 4018-07 98 (703) 772-2004 O~ ELOANp,S,~ ~ •^ p ~ Z ~ a~ Z ~ V'~~~~ Y~ r rt ~Y~~~~~ 18 E~ 88 SFSQUICENTE-~N~P~ ABeaurifulBeginning BOARD OF SUPERVISORS LEE GARRETT. CHAIRMAN WINDSOR NILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RICHARD W. BORERS. VICE-CHAIRMAN ELMER C. HODGE CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON Augu st 21, 1989 HOLLINS MAGISTE RIAL DIST RICT STEVEN A. MCGRAW CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT Mr. Herbert K. Flowers 2910 Catawba Valley Drive Salem, Virginia 24153 Dear Mr. Flowers: At their regular meeting on Tuesday, August 22, 1989, the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors unanimously approved the request of the Loyal Order of Moose Lodge No. 284 for a raffle permit. The raffle will be conducted on October 22, 1989. The fee has been paid and your receipt is enclosed. You may consider this letter to be your permit, and I suggest it be displayed on the premises where the raffle is to be conducted. The State Code provides that raffle and bingo permits be issued on a calendar-year basis and such permits issued will expire on December 31, 1989. This permit, however, is only valid for the date specified on your application. If I may be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me at 772-2004. Sincerely, Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisor bjh Enclosures cc: Commissioner of the Revenue Commonwealth Attorney County Treasurer F'O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 2 4018-07 9 8 (703> 772-2004 O~ POANp,Y~ ~ ,A 9 Z Z v a 18 E50 88 SFSQUICENTENN~P~ A Beauti~ul Beginning COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE August 9, 1989 Rev. Jeffrey Butcher Bonsack United Methodist Church 4697 Bonsack Road Roanoke, Virginia 24012 Dear Reverend Butcher: LEE GARRETT, CHAIRMAN WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT RICHARD W. ROBERS. VICE-CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT STEVEN A. MCGRAW CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT On behalf of the Board of Supervisors, I would like to take this opportunity to let you know of our appreciation for your attending the meeting on Tuesday, August 22, 1989, to offer the invocation. We feel so that all is donre according to His, wi 11 and for the good meetings of all citizens. Thank you for sharing your time with us. bjh C~o~tn~~ of ~vttnvke BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Sinc rely, ~~~~~ L e Garrett, Chairman Roanoke County Board of Supervisors PO. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 2 4018-07 9 8 (703) 772-2004 ~~ aonrv ~.~ ~_ Z ~ ~ c ..- °~ ' ~ a ~~ ~~~t~~~~ C~~~n~ ,~ ~ 18 Yea 88 SFSQUICENTENN~P~ COMMISSIONER OF THE REVENUE A Bcautiful8eginning J u n e 12 , 19 8 9 R. WAYNE COMPTON August 3, 1989 -Second Request Mr. Elmer Hodge, Administrator Roanoke County 3738 Brambleton Ave. Roanoke, Va. 24018 Dear Elmer: Roanoke County has had a law suit against Houston Motors, Crouse Enterprises and Robert Crouse pending since 1985. The suit concerns taxes due from all three. Depositions were taken two years ago on a bill for $5,000. If you will recall, you and the County Attorney and I have met several times after I suggested that more agressive attempts be made to pursue the matter. The answer I received was that it has a low priorty. Also, I have tried contacting the County Attorney's office personally reguesting letters be written reguiring Mr. Crous( to respond, with no success. My request is that I be allowed to contract an outside attorney `', for this case. Yours truly, ~--~ R. Wayne ompton Commiss' ner of th ,Revenue RWC/cp P.O. BOX 20409 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24018-0513 • (703> 772-2048 `~~ ~ ~ DRAFT ~~ For biscussion OnVy ACTION # Subiect to Revision ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETI THEOROANOKEBOCOUNTY ADMINISTRATION OCENTERNOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT MEETING DATE: August 22, 1989 SUBJECT: Bonsack Fire and Rescue Station COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND: The bond referendum approved in 1985 included $300,000 for the construction of a fire.ld a substationvwith one fireatrucketo function time the plan was to bui ro ert under the command of the Vinton Fire Department, on the p p Y adjacent to the Blue Ridge Library • oDint facility owith Roanoke Citye Board suggested the possibility of a j Staff was directed to examine, with the City, alternatives for a joint operation. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: After a thorough review of alternatives, and in view of the expanded service area, the Croachoista ointltfull-servicetFiremand practical and cost effective app J EMS station with a c mend t ons oincluded innd this u report p have nthe Information and recom concurrence of the City members of the committee. Service Area The planned service area fo~otV dedtforothe Vintoneand Hollins I. Backup will also be p departments and for the Blue Ridge area on request. Coverage 7AM - 7PM, Monday thru Friday -Manned by career staffing (Minimum of three fire suppression personnel) All other hours -Manned by volunteers See Exhibit 2 Site Location The committee evaluated the Blue Ridge Library site and concluded that it was not the from receipteofccallctolarrival coverage and response time (time on the scene) in the expanded service drovided sitelselection a joint approach. The committee then P and County assessment guideline to representatives of the City Offices and asked them tO, vestilationteisatcompl to an de a recommendation. Their in g recommendation has been made. The proposed location indicated on Exhibit 1. Cost and Financing The estimated cost for the constExhibit 3). The costlwillabe equipment is $908,000 (Column 3, The County now has shared equally by the City and the County. 483,000 for the project. It is anticipated thaTOne t d1Annual funds will be required from the County for this P by the two cost of operation will be shared equally 'urisdictions and is estimated to be approximately $125COo00 J each. This funding is nhibitc3uded in the current budget. details are shown in Ex Sch_ ule It is anticipated that the station will be operational by September 1990. A tentative work schedule is attached as Exhibit 4. RECOMMENDATION: roceed It is recommended that ntract° w th uthe rCityt of Roanoke f or Fire with the negotiation of a co and operation of the Bonsack construction, staffing, equipping, the contract will be and Rescue o to our .reviewoand oapprovalXecution, presented f y Respectfully submitted, Thom s C. F qua / Chi f of Fire & , e"s cue Department - - - - - ACTION Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred To - Motion by: Approved by, Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator Garrett Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers VOTE No Yes Abs EXHIBIT 1 E% H I B I T 2 Fu11-Time Equivalent Positions er week multiplied by 52 weeks minus 144 One position 40 hours p 52 and you annual leave and 120 hours aTCk Divide thislby equals t e hours minimthenm~nimumf numberhofrworkrhours per work per position. have Example: 2080 hours 40 hours X 52 weeks _ 1936 hours 2080 - 144 _ 1816 hours 1936 - 120 __ 34.92 hours 1816 - 52 Minimum hours worked per week - 35 the Bonsack Station will be three on fire engine and for to 7 p.m., Monday a.m. Manning ersonnel two on ambulance. The work schedule is total manning by the hru Friday, a total of 60 hoursou mult Ply he number of P t required to meet the manning y number of work hours and divide by 35. Example _ 5 3 fire + 2 rescue - 300 5 X 60 hours _ 8.57 300 - 35 - Total positions required - 9 E X H I B I T 3 6 U a~ ~ 'J+ O ~~ .t O ~ A ~" ~~ a~ O O O ~ ~ N ~, {~' O O tf1 O ~ ~ ~ M N N ~ N ~ ~ c~ rf} tf~ ffl- ~ 4Fr z ~n o o~0 0 0 0 ° 0 °o~a ° ° ° o ~ ~ ° O ~-! O O O O O t"' C/~ O N Ul ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ •Ui U ~ ~ ~ tR ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 N M ~ ~ M ~ ~ I ~ N M ~ ~f'1 M N ~ ~ ~ n N n u o 0 ~ 0 0 -n 0 ° ~ 0 O ~ ^'~ N N N ~ N O ~ ~~ ~ ~ .-. ~ ~ ... .. ~" W A H ,~ z 00 O ~ A M ~ O A ~ p p Z ~ ~ ~ w~ ~ \ z AW Hd a wo ~o 0 o ~ ~ ~ U a o z ~a o~ ~ ~- z x 0 H ~ ~,j c l~ W H C~ H H W ~ ..--~ N p p pp O O O tf1 ~ O ~ 8 O O O O O N N ~ ON ~ ~ ~ ~ o O S o 0 0 °~ o 0 0 0 ,.n ~ N ~f'1 ~ ~ ~ pp M ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ tf) .. W ^~ c~ H ~ ~ .. z~iz ~ c~i~ o H z Ar.H a U .. ~ H `~ .dim ~ ~ d W fH-{ W PO-~ W ~ .z.~ H a ~ W ~ ~ ~ pp~ d d a d w H A a r~ a O M ~ ~ `~ r H 00 00 o~gd 0 O ~ ~ r N~ N Z O ~ ~ ~ tl~~~ ~ ~ ~ p O O O O p O d „ ~Nz ~ N r-I ~~~ +~ M ^ b U `~ v A ~ ~ ~ w ~ O W +~ ' ~ ~ ,b y"i a •~ a~ ~ d ~ ~ ~ ~ '~ ~ O ~ W ~ ~ s.+ G U ~ ~"~ ww w~ ~ w E X H I B I T 4 Bonsack Fire Station Project Tentative Schedule Task o Site Selection o Board/Council Approval o Complete contract o Approval Board/Council o Purchase property o Building - Firm up requirements - Meet with procurement - RFP for A & E service - Select vendor o Volunteers recruitment and training o Hiring and training of paid staff o Procurement of equipment - Apparatus o Develop S. 0. P's. o Station operational - Fire - EMS Estimated Completion Date 8/15/89 (Complete) 8/28/89 9/15/89 9/25/89 9/26/89 8/25/89 8/29/89 9/05/89 10/06/89 8/90 8/90 7/90 8/90 9/90 9/90 A p .,. ~ `~~ , ~d6 QiVPoA y'~ ~~ ~f~- ~,~1~ e.r'„s a .~ ,. [~/ atM~ DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES DIVISION OF CONSOLIDATED LABORATORY SERVICES Mr. Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-075 Dear Mr. Hodge: l"~` We received your lab's security system ma of the deed is being for for further action. We have nearly con ~ „~~ ~~ maxe a presentation to Bill Lawrie of Dewberry resentation would includelans. Would your Board of Supervisors. The a well as proposed floor p rendering of the proposed facility ust 22 meeting? you please put us on the agenda for your Aug We are also enthusiastic about this project. The proposed facility improve laboratory operations for the Medical Examiner and our will not only but it will enable us to Western Regional Forensic Science Laboratory, rovide better Health and Environmental services to the Roanoke Valley and P Western part of the state. We look forward to meeting with your Board on August 22. Sincerely yours, ~ 9 ~r J (~ A. W. Tiedemann, 7r., Ph.D. Division Director sw cc: Bill Lawrie, Dewberry & Davis DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIV CONSOLIDATEDD LAIBORATORY SERVICES& D VIISION OF RISK MANAGEMENT DIVISION OF PURCHASES & SUPPLY • DIVISION OF ~ FtOANp~~ >. F- 7~ z O 2 a` e OFFICE OF DIVISION SUPERINTENDENT ROANOKE COUNTY SCHOOLS 526 SOUTH COLLEGE AVENUE SALEM, VIRGINIA 24153 August 11, 1989 Mary, Enclosed is an appropriation resolution which we would like to have placed on the August 22, 1989 meeting of the Board of Supervisors. Mrs. Penny Hodge, financial analyst, will appear at the meeting to answer questions board members may have. Thanks, Rut ,,~ ~v r Enclosure O~ ROAN ~.FL ~.~ Z o Z J a ~a ~~ es sFSQUICENTENN~P~ A BeautifulBeginning C~vixn~~ of ~,~nttnvke BOARD OGA REnRC IIAIROMAN WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT RICHARD W~ BORERS. VICE-CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT STEVEN A. MCGRAW CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR March 27 - 1989 ELMER C. HODGE Rev. Jeffrey Butcher Bonsack United MethNdWst Church 4697 Bonsack Road, 24012 Roanoke, Virginia C~ ~ ~ ,i_~~~~ Dear Reverend Butcher: On behalf hone I would tloike ftooah nk You for This will confirm ouervisors, on Tuesday, of the Board of Sup s are held at 3738 a teeing to give the invocatioThetmeetingmeetling g 1989, at 3:00 p•m• Administration Center August 22• in the Roanoke County Brambleton Avenue, Community Room. o u as a before the board meeting, I will call Y On Monday ind at any time that you are unabementsdcanhbe reminder. If You f for us , please let m bern~s 772 t2005.other arran made. My telephone num and embers are aware of how busy your schedule is, our volunteering the time to offer God's The Board m they appreciate Y blessing at their meeting. Sincerely, Holton, Secretary Brenda J• Board of Supervisors Roanoke County bjh c~ . P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 2 4018-07 9 8 (703) -772-2004 L E G A L N O T I C E Notice is hereby given to all interested persons that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at their evening session beginning at 7:00 p.m. on Tuesday, AUGUST 22, 1989 in the Community Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, S.W., Roanoke, Virginia, on the petition of TRINITY CHURCH TO REZONE A 5.43 ACRE TRACT FROM M-2, INDUSTRIAL TO B-1, BUSINESS TO CONSTRUCT A CHURCH, LOCATED ALONG THE EAST SIDE OF ROUTE 220 AT ITS INTERSECTION WITH ROUTE 958 IN THE CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT. The County Planning Commission recommends APPROVAL WITH CONDITIONS A copy of the Zoning Ordinance of Roanoke County and amendments thereto as well as a copy of the petition, site plan, and other documents related to this request may be examined in the office of the Department of Planning and Zoning, located in Room 600 of the Roanoke County Administration Center. Roanoke County will provide assistance to handicapped persons desiring to attend public hearings. Such individuals are requested to contact the County office of Personnel Services ([703] 772-2018) if special provisions are necessary for attendance. Given under my hand this THIRD day of AUGUST, 1989. YY)CL-~.-Ly-, ~ _ C~~- L.f~ix-J Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Please publish in the evening edition of the Roanoke Times and World News on: TUESDAY, AUGUST 8, 1989 TUESDAY, AUGUST 15, 1989 Direct the bill for Publication to: TRINITY CHURCH 5004 COLONIAL AVENUE ROANOKE, VA. 24018 L, E G A L N O T I C E iven to all interested persons that the ublic hearing at their Notice is hereby g ervisors will hold a p AUGUST 22, 1989 in Roanoke County Board of Sup m, on Tuesday, 3738 session beginning at 7:00 p• Administration Center, evening Room of the Roanoke County on the petition of LOBO the Community S.W., Roanoke, Virginia, RESIDENTIAL TO R-1, Brambleton Avenue, 14 ACRE TRACT FROM R-5I,OCATED ALONG THE SOUTH INVESTORS TO REZONE A 6. RESIDENTIAL TO CONSTNUCT SINGLE FAMILY HOME ,IA ROAD, 200 FEET EAST FROM LTDISTRICTECTION WITH SIDE OF BUCK MOUNTAI BRp,NDERWOOD DRIVE IN THE CAVE SPRING MAGISTE nds APPROVAL' WITH The County Planning Commission recomme CONDITIONS. and amendments of the Zoning Ordinance of Roanokelanunand other A copy of the petition, site p thereto as well as a cops request may be examinedomi600hofothecRoanokee documents related to thand Zoning, located in Ro Department of Planning County Administration Center. ed persons will provide assistance to handicapp uested to Roanoke County s, Such individu703~a~72r2018) if desiring to attend public hearing ct the County office of P rrsforeattendance.([ conta special provisions are necessa 1989. Given under my hand this THIRD day of AUGUST, Mary H. Allen, Clerk Board of Supervisors Roanoke County ublish in the evening edition please p World News on: of the Roanoke Times and AUGUST 8, 1989 TUESDAY, o: Direct the bill for Publication TUESDAY, AUGUST 15, 1989 & PRILLp,MAN, P . C . JOLLY, PLACE, FRp,LIN, W. HEYWOOD FRALIN 3912 ELECVRAIC 240185• W. ROANOKE, L E G A L N O T I C E iven to all interested persons that the ublic hearing at their Notice is hereby g ervisors will hold a p AUGUST 22, 1989 in Roanoke County Board of Sup m, on Tuesday, 3738 evening session beginning at 7:00 P• Administration Center, Virginia, on the petition of PATSY AND the Community Room of then anokee County BED AND Brambleton Avenue, S.W., LLIE FOR A USE NOT PROVIDES FOR PERMIT TO OPERAT IDENCE ON A 5 ACRE TRACT LOCATED AT CLYDE CO IN THE CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRIC .L WITH BREAKFASTORWOODNROp,DTION WITH A 4225 HARE The County Planning Commission recommends ppPROVA CONDITIONS. and amendments of the Zoning Ordinance of Roanokelanunand other A copy of the petition, site p thereto as well as a c$is request may be examineomi600hof thecR an kee documents related to t and Zoning, located in Ro Department of Planning County Administration Center. ed persons will provide assistance to handicapp ested to Roanoke County s, Such individu~03~a~~2r2018) if desiring to attend public hearing ntact the County office ofsa~rsfsreattendance.([ co special provisions are neces 1989. Given under my hand this THIRD daY of AUGUST, ~,~. ~- ~'~-~ Mary H. lien, Clerk Board of Supervisors Roanoke County ublish in the evening edition Please p of the Roanoke Times and World News on. AUGUST 8, 1989 TUESDAY, o: Direct the bill for Publication TUESDAY, AUGUST 15, 1989 PATSY AND CLYDE COLLIE WILL PAY BILL UPON DELIVERY L E G A L N O T I C E Notice is hereby given to all interested persons that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a pubAUGUSTa22ng1989tinir evening session beginning at 7:00 p.m. on Tuesday, 3738 the Community Room of the Roanoke County Administratetitiontof~ THE _ Brambleton Avenue, S.W., Roanoke, Virginia, on the p _ ROp,NOKE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION~TS FROM RURALFPRESERVE TOUPRINCIPAL DESIGNATION OF APPROXIMATELY 10 AC INDUSTRIAL, LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAVINTONMAGISTERIAL DISTRICT N OF 16TH STREET AND CARLISLE AVENUE IN THE The County Planning Commission recommends APPROVAL of the Zoning Ordinance of Roanoke County and amendments A copy lan, and other thereto as well as a copy of the petition, site p documents related to this request may be examined in the office of the Department of Planning and Zoning, located in Room 600 of the Roanoke County Administration Center. will provide assistance to handicapped persons Roanoke County Such individuals are requested to desiring to attend public hearings. 772-2018) if contact the County office of Personnel Services ([703] special provisions are necessary for attendance. Given under my hand this THIRD day of AUGUST, 1989. Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Please publish in the evening edition of the Roanoke Times and World News on: TUESDAY, AUGUST 8, 1989 TUESDAY, AUGUST 15, 1989 Direct the bill for Publication to: ROANOKE COUNTY PLANNING AND ZONING P . O. BOX, 29800 ROANOKE, VA. 24018 L E G A L N O T I C E Notice is hereby given to all interested persons that tat their Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing Roanoke County m, on Tuesday, AUGUST 22, 1989 in evening session beginning at 7:00 p• Administration Center, 3738 the Community Room of the Roanoke County on the petition of HDC, INC. Brambleton Avenue, S.W., Roanoke, Virginia, gESIDENTIAL TO REZONE A 19.30 ACRE TRACT FROM R-6, RESIDENTIAL TO R-3, TO CONSTRUCT SINGLE FAMILY HOMESINTERSECDIONOWITHHGARSTTMILLDROAD IN THE p,DAMSON ROAD, 300 FEET FROM ITS WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT The County Planning Commission recommends APPROVAL WITH CONDITIONS of the Zoning Ordinance of Roanoke County and amendments A copy of the petition, site plan, and other thereto as well as a copy be examined in the office of the documents related to this request mlocated in Room 600 of the Roanoke Department of Planning and Zoning, County Administration Center. rovide assistance to handicapped persons Roanoke County will p Such individu703,are requeste o desiring to attend public hearings. 772-2018) if contact the County office of Personnel Services ([ special provisions are necessary for attendance. Given under my hand this THIRD day of AUGUST, 1989. /°~ - Mary H. llen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Plethe Roanoke TimeseandeWorldeNewsoon: of TUESDAY, AUGUST 8, 1989 Direct the bill for Publication o: TUESDAY, AUGUST 15, 1989 HDC, INC. Tp,NGLEWOOD WEST SUITE 100 3959 ELECTRIC ROAD ROp,NOKE, VA. 24018 a 1. Petition of Roanoke County Planning Commission to amend the Future Land Use Plan map designation of approximately 10 acres from Rural Preserve to Principal Industrial, located at the northeast corner of the intersection of 16th Street and Carlisle Avenue in the Vinton Magisterial District. APPROVED Please bill: Roanoke County Planning & Zoning, P.O. Box 29800, Roanoke, VA 24018 ~4~_ 2. P tition of HDC, Inc. to rezone a 19.30 acre tract fran R-6, Residential to ~C ~ `~~ R-3, e idential to construct single family a~d pa~io hones, located along the ~ ~~ south side of Adamson Road, 300 feet from its intersection with Garst Mill Road in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District. APPROVID WITH CONDITIONS Please bill: HDC, Inc., Tanglewood West Suite 100, 3959 Electric Road, Roanoke, VA 24018 3. Petition of Patsy & Clyde Collie for a Use Not Provided For Permit to operate a bed and breakfast in conjunction with a residence on a 5 acre tract located at 4225 Harborwood Road in the Catawba Magisterial District. APPROVID WITH CONDITIONS To be paid by Patsy & Clyde Collie upon delivery ,~ ~;' ~. Petition of LOBO Investors to rezone a 6.14 acre tract from R-5, Residential to R-l, Residential to construct single family homes, located along the south side of Buck Mountain Road, 200 feet east from its intersection with Branderwood Drive in the Cave Spring Magisterial District. APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS Please bill: Jolly, Place, Fralin & Prillaman, P.C. W. Heywood Fralin, 3912 Electric Road, SW, Roanoke, VA 2401$ ~ ~.__ Petition of Trinity Church to rezone a 5.43 acre tract from M-2, Industrial to ~~ B-1, Business to construct a church, located along the east side of Route 220 at its intersection with Route 958 in the Cave Spring Magisterial District. APPROVID WITH CONDITIONS Please bill: Trinity Church, 5004 Colonial Avenue, Roanoke, VA 24018 i 9T iti C-. 1 '~(~~ T0: Mary Allen FROM: Terry Harrington '1~ Director of Planning DATE: July 28, 1989 SUBJECT: Board of Supervisors, .August 22 Agenda The Planning Commission did not receive any new requests this month for public hearings in September. On the August agenda of the Planning Commission, under the consent agenda section, I have placed the notation, "No New Requests for September." You may wish to consider a similar notation on the Board's August 22 agenda in order to familiarize them with the new format. ajb COMMITTEE VACANCIES IN 1989 JANUARY Court Service Unit Advisory Council/Youth and Family Services Advisory Board Two year term of Hoyt C. Rath, Vinton District, will expire 1/26/89. T+'T+'Rt?iT ~R V Electoral Board - Appointed by the Courts Three year term of Mrs. May Johnson will expire 2/28/89. MARCH Court Service Unit Advisory Council/Youth and Family Services Advisory Board Two year terms of James L. Trout, Cave Spring District, Red R. Powell, Cave Spring District, and James K. Sanders, Windsor Hills District, will expire 3/22/89. League of Older Americans One year term of Webb Johnson, County Representative, will expire 3/31/89. JUNE Board of Zonincr Appeals - Appointed by Judcre of Circuit Court Five Year term of Neil W. Owen will expire 6/30/89. Fifth Planning District Commission Three year terms of Richard W. Robers, Fred Anderson and John Hubbard, Citizen Representative and Executive Committee will expire 6/30/89. Parks & Recreation Advisory Commission Three year terms of Vince Joyce, Cave Spring District, Alice Gillespie, Hollins District, and Thomas Robertson, Vinton District, will expire 6/30/89. SEPTEMBER Council/Youth and Famil Court Service UnitBoardsor Services Advisor rd, Glenvar Youth Members from Cave Spring, William BY Hi h and Northside High Schools to be appointed. g Industrial Develo ment Authorit ring ear terms of Billy H. Branch, Cave Sp Four Y and W. Darnall Vinyard, Vinton District will DisteXpire 9/26/89. Grievance Panel ire 9/27/89• Two year term of Kim Owens will exp NOV_ E- MBEF? Health De artment Board of Directorsx fires 11/26/89• Two year term of Susan Adcock will e P DECEM Lib~rary Board ear term of Richard Kirkwood, Hollins District, Four y Mr, Kirkwood resigned 12/88• will expire 12/21/89• Communit Mental Health Services of the Roanoke Valle Services Board will ear term of Sue Ivey, County appointee, Three y - expire 12/31/89. Plannin Commission Roanoke Count ear term of Wayland Winstead, Catawba District, Four y will expire 12/31/89. . Roanoke Count Resource Authorit Bob L. Johnson and Henry Initial terms of LeereaDecember 31, 1989. C. Nickens will exp Re Tonal Partnershi Site Advisor Committee ear term of Charles Saul will expire 12/21/89. Three y A- 88 -2 HCN/SAM TO APPROVE ALT. ~1 URC Resolution requesting VDOT for maintenance to 3' i es on Taney Drive drainage P P R_ 8_ 8~ 3 BLJ/SAM TO ADOPT RESO URC E. REQUEST FOR WORK SESSIONS NONE E.. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC BEARINGS NONE G. E•IRST READING OF ORDINAI`TCES conveyance of rights of way 1, Ordinance authorizingDevelopment Project for in Hollins Community g stem. acceptance into the State Secondary Y BLJ/RR TO APPROVE 1ST READING 2ND - 8/22/89 URC Ordinance authorizing the dedicaartment ofuHealth. 2. well lots for benefit of the eP LG/SAM TO APPROVE 1ST READING 2ND - 8/22/89 URC g, SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES Ordinance accepting an offer for and authorizing 1' ance of surplus real estate on Route the convey to the Virginia Department of 1832 (Barrens Road) Transportation. O-8.~ 9=4 HCN/SAM TO ADOPT ORD URC 2 O~ AOANp~,~ a w a ~~ ,.1~~tYtiY~~ ,~ ~ 18 ~.a 88 a'FS~UICENTENN~P~ ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS A Bcnu~i~ul Beginning ACTION AGENDA AUGUST 8, 1989 Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meeting. Regular meetings are held on the second Tuesday and the fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public Hearings will be heard at 7:00 p.m on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. A.. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.) 1. Roll Call: ALL PRESENT 2. Invocation: The Reverend Quentin White Bethel AME Church 3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag. B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS. ECH ADDED ITEM B-3, RESOLUTION REQUESTING VDOT FOR MAINTENANCE TO DRAINAGE PIPES ON TANSY DRIVE C. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS AND AWARDS 1. Recognition of Treasurer Alfred Anderson for receiving designation as Certified Finance Official. PRESENTED BY HCN TO FRED ANDERSON D. NEW BUSINESS 1. Request for authorization to resolve drainage problem at 5162 Cave Spring Lane A-8889-1 RR/SAM TO APPROVE ALT. #1 URC 2. Approval of new position in the Office of the Sheriff M E M O RAN D U M TO: Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator rian T. Duncan, Economic Development Specialist FROM' DATE: August 3, 1989 f 5.039± acres in the Southwest Industrial Park SUBJECT: Sale o to Sid 039 acres in the S4I acres in These gentlemen purchased 1• Last week wGorman Howellhe dale °f on we decided to extend water Maupin and During this discussi ~ ro erty line. You will be SWIp recently.) to the p P they are and sewer, as well as the road, urchasing 2.039 acres,ur ose of 5.039± acres for the p P pleased tO k the tpu chaseeao o P s. This considering four to six industrial bui Mixgsite. I subdividing and building ould be a nice progressionAu ust 4he1989noke Rea y w hope to have a contract by Details of deal: Sale price ($28-750 Per acre) $144,872 Return to Higginbotham -1-"g75 Remaining from sale $ 18'897 Balance from SWIP budget +565 Total available I,u sden) $ 23,462 Lee Henderson/ ~ _ Estimated road cost 1-x"225 Lee Henderson/Lumsden) $ 8,237 rading cost 51000 Estimated g $ 3,237 Total remaining ossibly and I have had several drocerty°line n He feels Clifford Craig a for itself extending water and sewer service tro ect and will p Y that this would be an appropriate p J through future hook-uPs• _ turned down my ""~~~ tction to their Finally, the owners of the R^a ~ ny most recent ~,, . ,. request f^'" it broker feels offer this site over a five to f s ~ into these two generate tax A sre will be a s~ ~ to in Roanoke d~ P~ Cc An sb~ FROM THE MINUTES OF THE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD OF ROA 80KEATCOUPTM: VIRGINIA, MEETING IN REGULAR SESSION ON AUGUST 10, IN THE BOARD ROOM OF THE SCHOOL ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, SALEM, VIRGINIA. RESOLUTION REQUESTING ADDITIONAL APPROPRIATIONS TO THE ROANOKE COUNTY SCHOOLS' BUDGET WHEREAS, additional grant funding has been received for the Roanoke County School System; BE IT RESOLVED that the County School Board of Roanoke County, on motion of Maurice L. Mitchell and duly seconded requests appropriations by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County for the following funds: 1. Drug Free Schools and Community Grant (federal) for the employment of a coordinator for the student assistance program. Amount budgeted 1989-90: $35,000; amount of grant: $55,303. Additional Appropriation Requested: $20,303.00 to the following budget codes: Revenue - 25-5-00000-330400 Expenditure - 25-6-1102R-1A3000 2. Vocational 2 + 2 Grant received from Cooper Industries. Additional Appropriation Requested for 1989-90: $10,000.00 to the following budget codes: Revenue - 25-5-00000-600000 Expenditure - 25-6-13135-3H5803 3. Melding the Arts and the Vocations: A Vocational Program for Gifted Students Interested in Art (federal grant). Appropriation Requested for 1989-90: $5,000.00 to the following budget codes: Revenue - 25-5-OOOOU-600001 Expenditure - 25-6-1313V-403114 Expenditure - 25-6-1313V-406013 Materials & S' Expenditure - 25-6-1313V-405807 Instructional Consultants Instructional applies Other Expenses to the following budget codes: Revenue - 25-5-00000-600002 Expenditure - 25-6-1319W-005501 Travel Expenditure - 25-6-1319W-006013 Materials & Supplies Expenditure - 25-6-1319W-003114 Consultants Approved by the following recorded vote: AYES: Paul G. Black, Maurice L. Mitchell, Charlsie S. Pafford, Frank E. Thomas NAYS: None ABSENT: Barbara B. Chewning TESTE: ,,'" ~ ~ . ~~ ~ ~ ~ Clerk ~~ c: Mrs. Diane Hyatt -J CITY OF ROANOKE OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY 464 MUNICIPAL BUILDING ROANOKE,VIRGINIA2 40 1 1-1 595 WILLIAM X PARSONS TELEPHONE 703.981-2431 TELECOPIER 703.98~•z94o MARK ALLAN WILLIAMS KATHERINE HOWE JONES STEVEN J. TALEVI ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEYS WILBURN C. DIBLING, JR. CITY ATTORNEY August 4, 1989 0. D. Page, P.E. Professional Engineers and Consultants 7535 Springlake Drive Bethesda, Maryland 2061? Re: Roanoke Regional Cable Television franchise renewal Dear Mr. Page: Thank you for your letter of July 24, 1989, describing news Because of the items which are relevant to cable franchising. of your letter nature of this material, I have forwarded a copy to Al Beckley, City Communications Manager, who is familiar with the technical aspects of cable television. Mr. Beckley is also in a better position to evaluate your recommendation that the jurisdictions consider subscribing to "Multi-Channel News" as a way of keeping current on the state of the cable television industry. It is my understanding that the Regional Cable Television Committee may conduct three separate meetings, one in each of the franchising jurisdictions, for the purpose of receiving public comment and input on the proposed franchise renewal. Prior to conducting these meetings, it has been suggested that each of the jurisdictions ftronlitsabehalfZe AhdrafglauthorizingTresolution Committee to ac is enclosed for your review. Assuming authorizing resolutions are passed by each of the jurisdictions, it is our understanding that the Regional Cable Television Committee will then be in a position to commence public hearings. It is also our understanding from you that use_ of this procedure will comply with the requirements of the;~ormal~ renewal process under the Cable Communications Policy Act of 1984. Please contact us if this proposed procedure is appro- priate or if you have any other comments or suggestions. Thank you very much for your continuing help and cooperation in this matter. Very truly yours, ~~~~ ~ ~ Mark Allan Williams Assistant City Attorney MAW:sm Enclosure 0. D. Page, P.E. August 4, 1989 Page 2 cc: Members, Roanoke Regional Cable Television Committee Hilburn C. Dibling, Jr., City Attorney Paul Mahoney, County Attorney Frank Selbe, III, Vinton Town Attorney Alfred Beckley, Communications Manager (w/enclosure)