HomeMy WebLinkAbout10/24/1989 - Regular
AN ,~.
Z ,~~~
~~
z ~~~~~
,a u~ s8
aESQU1CENTEN~~~~ BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
LEE GARRETT. CHAIRMAN
,.~ B(QMfI'{Il Bcg~mm~g VyIND50R HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
RICHARD W. ROBERS. VICE-CHAIRMAN
CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR y~1 ~~~~/~1 BOB L JOHNSON
ELMER C. HODGE ROANORE CO{J L\1Y BO~ OF SUPERVISORS HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
STEVEN A. MCGRAw
- ACTION AGENDA CATAW6A MAGISTERIAL D.ST RIOT
HARRY C NICKENS
VIN TON MAGISTERIAL DICTRICT
OCTOBER 24, 1989
Re ular
Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meeting. Q
meetings are held on the second Tuesday and the fourth Tuesday at 3:00
p.m. Public Hearings will be heard at 7:00 p.m on the fourth Tuesday
of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced.
THERE WILL NOT BE AN EVENING SESSION TODAY
A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:05 P.M.)
1. Roll Call. (HCN ARRIVED 3:07 p.m.)
2. Invocation: CooperseCove BaptistwChurch
3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag.
B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA
ITEMS.
NONE
C. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS AND AWARDS
1. Recognition of the Landfill Citizens Advisory Committee
for winning the Virginia Citizens Planning Association
Award.
PRESENTED BY MMBERSDOF~THEHLANDFILLDCITIZENSRADV SORYNCOMMITTEE
ACCEPTED BY ME
WHO WERE PRESENT.
2. Virginia Municipal League Achievement Awards
(1) Environmental Quality
(2) Community Development
1
__._._
P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24018-0798 (703) 772-2
AWARDS WERE PLACED ON DISPLAY AND RECOGNIZED BY LG AND BLJ.
D. NEW BUSINESS
1, Request from the Planning Commission for an
Interstate 81 Corridor Study.
A-102489-1
AMENDED MOTION
gp~/RWR TO APPROVE REQUESE~T~ ~~TgIIDGETUFOR THIEF gDARI,GAND BE
TAKEN FROM THE ECONOMIC D
THAT THE COUNTYP~TICIPATETOR(INCL DIN~MONTGOMERY COUNTY)
GOVERNMENTS T
URC
2, Rate~alaObligationrSchooleBondsf $1'115,000
Gen
R-102489-2
BLJ/SAM TO APPROVE RESOLUTION
IIRC
E. REQUEST FOR WORK SESSIONS
NONE
g. REQIIESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS
NONE
G. REQIIESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING FOR
REZONING ORDINANCES - CONSENT AGENDA
~ir-.~~
BLJ/HCN TO APPROVE & READINGS AND PUBLIC HEARINGS
FOR 11-28-89
URC
1, An ordinance to amend the Future Land Use Plan map
designation of approximately 54 acres located west
of Hollins Road and south of Lois Lane in the
Hollins Magisterial District from Development to
Principal and to change the zoning classification
from R-1 to M-1 for industrial developmcation of
purposes with conditions upon the app
the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
2
2. An ordinance to change the zoning classification
of approximately 15 acres of real estate located
at the end of Benois Road in the Cave Spring
Magisterial District from R-1 to M-1 for
industrial development with conditions upon the
application of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia.
3. An ordinance to change the zoning classification
of approximately 35 acres of real estate generally
located.. south. of I=81 and. west. of Plantation Road
in the Hollins Magisterial District from R-1 to M-
1 for mixed-use development with conditions upon
the application of the Board of Supervisors of
Roanoke County, Virginia.
4. An ordinance to change the zoning classification
of approximately 8 acres of real estate located at
the southeast corner of the intersection of State
Route 643 and I-81 in the Catawba Magisterial
District from B-2 to M-1 for industrial lication
development with conditions upon the app
of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia.
5. An ordinance to amend the Future Land Use Plan map
designation of approximately 25 acres located east
of Carvins Cove Dam Road and immediately north of
I-81 in the Catawba Magisterial District from
Development to Principal Industrial.
6. An ordinance to change the zoning classification
of approximately 125 acres of real estate located
south of Routes 11 and 460, south and west of
Barley Drive and the N&W railway in the Catawba
Magisterial District from A-1MH to M-1 for
industrial development with conditions upon the
application of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia.
7. An ordinance to issue a Use-NotiPcation ofoGregory
Permit with conditions upon app
Pierce to operate a training/education center on
approximately 72 acres of real estate located
northwest of the intersection of Routes 637 and
631 in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District.
g. PUBLIC BEARING AND SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES
3
1, Ordinance amending Sections 10-4 and 10-15 and
adding Section 10-19, Chapter 10, Licenses of the
Roanoke County Code.
NO ONE BPORE
0-102489-3
RWR/HCN - URC
2. Ordinance amending Chapter 8, "Erosion and
Sediment Control", of the Roanoke County Code by
amending Section 8-11 (a), "Control Measures
,..Generally" to provide for the. adoption of -
stormwater management criteria; and Resolution
adopting a new section of the Design and
Construction Standards Manual entitled "Stornnwater
Management Criteria."
NO ONE SPORE
HCN/SAM TO CONTINUE PIIBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDERATION OF SECOND
READING UNTIL 11-28-89 MEETING.
URC
BLJ REQUESTEDPARTICULARLYIGOINGCFROMR10E2 TO SROM.l010AND SHOW TABLE
SPECIFICITY,
REGARDING DRAINAGE BASIN.
LG/SAM EXECUTIVE SESSION AT 3:30 P.M. - URC
OUT OF EXECUTIVE SESSION - 4:15 P.M.
RESOLUTION CERTIFYING SESSION AT 4:17 P.M.
R-102489-4
LG/SAM - URC
I. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES
1• Ordinance authorizing the sale of 10 acres in the
Glenvar West section of Roanoke County.
0-102489-5
AMENDED MOTION
SAM/RWR TO APPROVE AND AMEND ORDINANCE, PARAGRAPH #4, SO THAT ALL
PROCEEDS FROM SALE GO TO A CAPITAL FUND ACCOIINT WITH THE INTENT
BEING THAT THE PROCEEDS WILL IMPROVE GREEN HILL PARR FACILITIES,
AND BRING TgCATAGREENRHILL PARRSATU11o15F89 MEETING~OF
IMPROVEMEN
URC
SAM REQIIESTED PARRS & ~REMENTNWITHIDIRECTIONISSION BE CONSULTE
TO SEE IF THEY ARE IN
4
J. APPOINTMENTS
1. Community Corrections Resources Board
2, Health Department Board of Directors
3, Industrial Development Authority
RWR NOMINATED BILLY BRANCH FOR REAPPOINTMENT.
4, Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission
5, Court Service Unit Advisory Council/Youth and
Family Services Advisory Board
SAM NOMINATED WAYLANISSIONTFOR FOURRYEAR PER ODT BEGINNING~O~
COIINTY PLANNING COMM
JANUARY 1, 1990.
R. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS
SUPERVISOR ROBERS - (1) MEETING WEER OF 11-17-89 WITH DR. GRAHAM
TO PLAN A TRIP FROM NORTHERN VIRGINIA TO THE ROANORE VALLEY FOR
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PURPOSES. (2) REPORTED ON THE RESPONSES
SEVERAL BUSINESSES MADE TO THE RECENT RECYCLING LETTER`S)
ENCOURAGED BY PROGRESS SOME ARE HARING IN THIS AREA.
MEETING ON 10-27-89 IN LEXINGTON WITH RAY PETHTEL, VDOT
COMMISSIONER, FOUR EXPERTS FROM THE US DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATIONEED NGSONETHIS IMPORTTANTDECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT.
PLANS ARE PROC
PROJECT.
SUPERVISOR MCGRAW - (1) VACO AND VML WILL HOLD SEVERAL MORE
MEETINGS AND PUBLIC HEARINGS ABOUT GRAYSON COMMISSION.
CONSIDERATIONS WILL BE GIVEN PROBABLY END OF NOVEMBER. REPORTED
ON VARIOUS REACTIONS TO CHANGE IN LAWS. (2) DISAGREES WITH
ARTICLE IN OCTOBER ISSUE OF VIRGINIA REVIEW WHICH SCRUTINIZES
STATE AND ELECTED OFFICIALS FOR NOT RESPONDING TO MAGAZINE
SIIRVEY. VACO DID NOT REVIEW THIS ERRONEOUS ARTIVACO WILLIPRpBABLY
NOT REFLECT THE POSITION OF THE ORGANIZATION.
SEVER THE ASSOCIATION WITH THIS MAGAZINE BY END OF YEAR.
SUPERVISOR GARRETT - (1) PRESENTED LETTER RECEIVED FROM RICK
LEICHTWEIS CONCERNINOTION TOAINCLUDENTHISPAREA OFF 419 ASNARTOP
EXTENSION. LG MADE M
PRIORITY SINCE WORK IS UNDERWAY IN THE AREA.
BLJ SECONDED FOR DISCUSSION.
SUBSTITUTE MOTION
RWR/HCN TO REFER TO STAFF
5
AYES: BLJ/RWR/SAM/HCN
NAYB: LG
ECH DIRECTED TO BRING BACK AT 11-15-89 MEETING.
I,. CONSENT AGENDA
ALL MATTERS LISTED IINDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE
CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROIITINE AND WILL BE
ENACTED BY ONE RESOLIITION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED
BELOW. IF MITHESCONSENT AGEND DANDHWILLTBE CONSIDERED
REMOVED FR
SEPARATELY.
R-102489-6
BW/gpri - IIRC
1. Minutes of Meetings - December 13, 1988, January
4, 1989, January 10, 1989, January 24, 1989,
February 14, 1989
2. Request for Approval of Raffle Permit - William
Byrd High School Cheerleader Booster Club.
A-102489-6.a
3, Request for acceptance of Twin Mountain Circle
into the Virginia Department of Transportation
Secondary System.
R-102489-6.b
M. CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMIINICATIONS
NONE
N. REPORTS
HCN/SAM TO RECEIVE AND FILE
IIRC
1. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance
2. General Fund Unappropriated Balance
3. Board Contingency Fund
4. Statement of Expenditures and Income Analysis -
September 30, 1989
6
O. EXECUTIVE SESSION pursuant to the Code of Virginia
Section 2.1-344
HELD FOLLOWING H.1 PUBLIC HEARING AND SECOND READING OF ORDINANCE
p. CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE SESSION
APPROVED FOLLOWING PUBLIC HEARING AND SECOND READING OF ORDINANCE
AND EXECUTIVE SESSION
Q. ADJOURNMENT
HCN/SAM AT 5:00 P.M. - tJVV
7
P~~F
2 ~
o a
~a E~ sa
$FSQUICENTENN~P~
A BeautifulBcginning
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
ELMER C. HODGE
(~nunfy of ~attnnkr
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
LEE GARRETT. CHAIRMAN
WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
RICHARD W. ROBERS. VICE-CHAIRMAN
CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
ROANORE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS HOLLINS MBAGoIg ER ALoDIS RoN
STEVEN A. MCGRAW
ACTION AGENDA CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
HARRY C. NICKENS
VIN TON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
OCTOBER 24, 1989
Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meeting. Regular
meetings are held on the second Tuesday and the fourth Tuesday at 3:00
p.m. Public Hearings will be heard at 7:00 p.m on the fourth Tuesday
of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced.
THERE WILL NOT BE AN EVENING SESSION TODAY
A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:05 P.M.)
1. Roll Call. (HCN ARRIVED 3:07 p.m.)
2. Invocation: The Reverend Sam Crews
Coopers Cove Baptist Church
3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag.
B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA
ITEMS.
NONE
C. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS AND AWARDS
1. Recognition of the Landfill Citizens Advisory Committee
for winning the Virginia Citizens Planning Association
Award.
PRESENTED BY MR. HODGE, JOHN HUBBARD, AND TERRY HARRINGTON.
ACCEPTED BY MEMBERS OF THE LANDFILL CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE
WHO WERE PRESENT.
2. Virginia Municipal League Achievement Awards
(1) Environmental Quality
(2) Community Development
1
P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 2 4018-07 9 8 (703) 772-2004
AWARDS WERE PLACED ON DISPLAY AND RECOGNIZED BY LG AND BLJ.
D. NEW BUSINESS
1. Request from the Planning Commission for an
Interstate 81 Corridor Study.
A-102489-1
AMENDED MOTION
SAM/RWR TO APPROVE REQUEST TO UNDERTAKE STUDY WITH FUNDING TO BE
TAKEN FROM THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT BUDGET FOR THIS YEAR, AND
THAT THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR EXTEND INVITATION TO OTHER
GOVERNMENTS TO PARTICIPATE. (INCLUDING MONTGOMERY COUNTY)
URC
2. Ratification of certain terms of $1,115,000
General Obligation School Bonds.
R-102489-2
BLJ/SAM TO APPROVE RESOLUTION
URC
E. REQUEST FOR WORK SESSIONS
NONE
F. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS
NONE
G. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING FOR
REZONING ORDINANCES - CONSENT AGENDA
BLJ/HCN TO APPROVE SECOND READINGS AND PUBLIC HEARINGS
FOR 11-28-89
URC
1. An ordinance to amend the Future Land Use Plan map
designation of approximately 54 acres located west
of Hollins Road and south of Lois Lane in the
Hollins Magisterial District from Development to
Principal and to change the zoning classification
from R-1 to M-1 for industrial development
purposes with conditions upon the application of
the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
2
2. An ordinance to change the zoning classification
of approximately 15 acres of real estate located
at the end of Benois Road in the Cave Spring
Magisterial District from R-1 to M-1 for
industrial development with conditions upon the
application of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia.
3, An ordinance to change the zoning classification
of approximately 35 acres of real estate generally
located south of I-81 and west of Plantation Road
in the Hollins Magisterial District from R-1 to M-
1 for mixed-use development with conditions upon
the application of the Board of Supervisors of
Roanoke County, Virginia.
4. An ordinance to change the zoning classification
of approximately 8 acres of real estate located at
the southeast corner of the intersection of State
Route 643 and I-81 in the Catawba Magisterial
District from B-2 to M-1 for industrial lication
development with conditions upon the app
of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia.
5. An ordinance to amend the Future Land Use Plan map
designation of approximately 25 acres located east
of Carvins Cove Dam Road and immediately north of
I-81 in the Catawba Magisterial District from
Development to Principal Industrial.
6. An ordinance to change the zoning classification
of approximately 125 acres of real estate located
south of Routes 11 and 460, south and west of
Barley Drive and the N&W railway in the Catawba
Magisterial District from A-1MH to M-1 for
industrial development with conditions upon the
application of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia.
7. An ordinance to issue a Use-Not-Provided-For
Permit with conditions upon application of Gregory
Pierce to operate a training/education center on
approximately 72 acres of real estate located
northwest of the intersection of Routes 637 and
631 in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District.
H. PUBLIC HEARING AND SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES
3
1. Ordinance amending Sections 10-4 and 10-15 and
adding Section 10-19, Chapter 10, Licenses of the
Roanoke County Code.
NO ONE SPORE
0-102489-3
RWR/HCN - URC
2. Ordinance amending Chapter 8, "Erosion and
Sediment Control", of the Roanoke County Code by
amending Section 8-11 (a), "Control Measures
Generally" to provide for the adoption of
stormwater management criteria; and Resolution
adopting a new section of the Design and
Construction Standards Manual entitled "Stormwater
Management Criteria."
NO ONE SPORE
HCN/SAM TO CONTINUE PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDERATION OF SECOND
READING UNTIL 11-28-89 MEETING.
URC
BLJ REQUESTED STAFF TO BRING BACK FURTHER INFORMATION WITH
SPECIFICITY, PARTICULARLY GOING FROM 10.2 TO 50.10 AND SHOW TABLE
REGARDING DRAINAGE BASIN.
LG/SAM EXECUTIVE SESSION AT 3:30 P.M. - URC
OUT OF EXECUTIVE SESSION - 4:15 P.M.
RESOLUTION CERTIFYING SESSION AT 4:17 P.M.
R-102489-4
LG/SAM - URC
I. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES
1. Ordinance authorizing the sale of 10 acres in the
Glenvar West section of Roanoke County.
0-102489-5
AMENDED MOTION
SAM/RWR TO APPROVE AND AMEND ORDINANCE, PARAGRAPH #4~ SO THAT ALL
PROCEEDS FROM SALE GO TO A CAPITAL FUND ACCOUNT WITH THE INTENT
BEING THAT THE PROCEEDS WILL IMPROVE GREEN HILL PARR FACILITIES,
AND BRING BACK APPROPRIATION RESOLUTION FOR FUNDING OF
IMPROVEMENTS AT GREEN HILL PARR AT 11-15-89 MEETING.
URC
SAM REQUESTED PARRS & RECREATION ADVISORY COMMISSION BE CONSULTED
TO SEE IF THEY ARE IN AGREEMENT WITH DIRECTION.
4
J. APPOINTMENTS
1. Community Corrections Resources Board
2. Health Department Board of Directors
S, Industrial Development Authority
RWR NOMINATED BILLY BRANCH FOR REAPPOINTMENT.
4. Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission
5. Court Service Unit Advisory Council/Youth and
Family Services Advisory Board
SAM NOMINATED WAYLAND WINSTEAD FOR REAPPOINTMENT TO THE ROANORE
COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FOR FOUR YEAR PERIOD, BEGINNING
JANUARY 1, 1990.
R. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS
SUPERVISOR ROWERS - (1) MEETING WEER OF 11-17-89 WITH DR. GRAHAM
TO PLAN A TRIP FROM NORTHERN VIRGINIA TO THE ROANORE VALLEY FOR
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PURPOSES. (2) REPORTED ON THE RESPONSES
SEVERAL BUSINESSES MADE TO THE RECENT RECYCLING LETTER(S)
ENCOURAGED BY PROGRESS SOME ARE HARING IN THIS AREA.
MEETING ON 10-27-89 IN LEXINGTON WITH RAY PETHTEL, VDOT
COMMISSIONER, FOUR EXPERTS FROM THE US DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION, AND SEVERAL OTHERS TO DISCUSS SMART HIGHWAY.
PLANS ARE PROCEEDING ON THIS IMPORTANT ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
PROJECT.
SUPERVISOR MCGRAW - (1) VACO AND VML WILL HOLD SEVERAL MORE
MEETINGS AND PUBLIC HEARINGS ABOUT GRAYSON COMMISSION.
REPORTED
CONSIDERATIONS WILL BE GIVEN PROBABLY END OF NOVEMBER.
ON VARIOUS REACTIONS TO CHANGE IN LAWS. (2) DISAGREES WITH
ARTICLE IN OCTOBER ISSUE OF VIRGINIA REVIEW WHICH SCRUTINIZES
STATE AND ELECTED OFFICIALS FOR NOT RESPONDING TO MAGAZINE
SURVEY. VACO DID NOT REVIEW THIS ERRONEOUS ARTICLE AND IT DOES
NOT REFLECT THE POSITION OF THE ORGANIZATION. VACO WILL PROBABLY
SEVER THE ASSOCIATION WITH THIS MAGAZINE BY END OF YEAR.
SUPERVISOR GARRETT - (1) PRESENTED LETTER RECEIVED FROM RICK
LEICHTWEIS CONCERNING SEWER AND DRAINAGE PROBLEMS, GRANDIN ROAD
EXTENSION. LG MADE MOTION TO INCLUDE THIS AREA OFF 419 AS A TOP
PRIORITY SINCE WORK IS UNDERWAY IN THE AREA.
BLJ SECONDED FOR DISCUSSION.
SUBSTITUTE MOTION
RWR/HCN TO REFER TO STAFF
5
AYES: BLJ/RWR/SAM/HCN
NAYS: LG
ECH DIRECTED TO BRING BACK AT 11-15-89 MEETING.
I,. CONSENT AGENDA
ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE
CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WILL BE
ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED
BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE
REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED
SEPARATELY.
R-102489-6
BLJ/SAM - URC
1. Minutes of Meetings - December 13, 1988, January
4, 1989, January 10, 1989, January 24, 1989,
February 14, 1989
2. Request for Approval of Raffle Permit - William
Byrd High School Cheerleader Booster Club.
A-102489-6.a
3. Request for acceptance of Twin Mountain Circle
into the Virginia Department of Transportation
Secondary System.
R-102489-6.b
M. CITIZENS COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS
NONE
rI. REPORTS
HCN/SAM TO RECEIVE AND FILE
URC
1. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance
2. General Fund Unappropriated Balance
3. Board Contingency Fund
4. Statement of Expenditures and Income Analysis -
September 30, 1989
6
O. EXECUTIVE SESSION pursuant to the Code of Virginia
Section 2.1-344
HELD FOLLOWING H.1 PUBLIC HEARING AND SECOND READING OF ORDINANCE
P. CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE SESSION
APPROVED FOLLOWING PUBLIC HEARING AND SECOND READING OF ORDINANCE
AND EXECUTIVE SESSION
Q. ADJOURNMENT
HCN/SAM AT 5:00 P.M. - UW
7
Fa AH~F ~~
o ~ Au-AMERICA Clilf
C~~~~~
~ ,
18 ~ 88
B~S~UICEN7ENN~P~ ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ~~ / ~`'' .
A BcawrifulBcginning
AGENDA
OCTOBER 24, 1989
Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meeting. Regular
meetings are held on the second Tuesday and the fourth Tuesday at 3:00
p.m. Public Hearings will be heard at 7:00 p.m on the fourth Tuesday
of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced.
THERE WILL NOT BE AN EVENING SESSION TODAY
A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.)
1. Roll Call.
2. Invocation: The Reverend Sam Crews
Coopers Cove Baptist Church
3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag.
B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA
ITEMS.
C. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS AND AWARDS
1. Recognition of the Landfill Citizens Advisory Committee
for winning the Virginia Citizens Planning Association
Award..
D. NEW BUSINESS
1. Request from the Planning Commission for an
Interstate 81 Corridor Study.
2. Ratification of certain terms of $1,115,000
General Obligation School Bonds.
E. REQUEST FOR WORK SESSIONS
F. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS
G. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING FOR
REZONING ORDINANCES - CONSENT AGENDA
1. An ordinance to amend the Future Land Use Plan map
designation of approximately 54 acres located west
of Hollins Road and south of Lois Lane in the
Hollins Magisterial District from Development to
Principal and to change the zoning classification
from R-1 to M-1 for industrial development
purposes with conditions upon the application of
the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia
2. An ordinance to change the zoning classification
of approximately 15 acres of real estate located
at the end of Benois Road in the Cave Spring
Magisterial District from R-1 to M-1 for
industrial development with conditions upon the
application of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia.
3. An ordinance to change the zoning classification
of appproximately 35 acres of real estate
generally located south of I-81 and west of
Plantation Road in the Hollins Magisterial
District from R-1 to M-1 for mixed-use development
with conditions upon the application of the Board
of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia.
4. An ordinance to change the zoning classification
of approximately 8 acres of real estate located at
the southeast corner of the intersection of State
Route 643 and I-81 in the Catawba Magisterial
District from B-2 to M-1 for industrial
development with conditions upon the application
of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia.
5. An ordinance to amend the Future Land Use Plan map
designation of approximately 25 acres located east
of Carvins Cove Dam Road and immediately north of
I-81 in the Catawba Magisterial District from
Development to Principal Industrial.
2
6. An ordinance to change the zoning classification
of approximately 125 acres of real estate located
south of Routes 11 and 460, south and west of
Barley Drive and the N&W railway in the Catawba
Magisterial District from A-1MH to M-1 for
industrial development with conditions upon the
application of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia.
7. An ordinance to issue a Use-Not-Provided-For
Permit with conditions upon application of Gregory
Pierce to operate a training/education center on
approximately 72 acres of real estate located
northwest of the intersection of Routes 637 and
631 in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District.
H. PUBLIC HEARING AND SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES
1. Ordinance amending Sections 10-4 and 10-15 and
adding Section 10-19, Chapter 10, Licenses of the
Roanoke County Code.
2. Ordinance amending Chapter 8, "Erosion and
Sediment Control", of the Roanoke County Code by
amending Section 8-11 (a), "Control Measures
Generally" to provide for the adoption of
stormwater management criteria; and Resolution
adopting a new section of the Design and
Construction Standards Manual entitled "Stormwater
Management Criteria."
I. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES
1. Ordinance authorizing the sale of 10 acres in the
Glenvar West section of Roanoke County.
J. APPOINTMENTS
1. Community Corrections Resources Board
2. Health Department Board of Directors
3, Industrial Development Authority
4. Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission
5. Court Service Unit Advisory Council/Youth and
Family Services Advisory Board
3
K. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS
L. CONSENT AGENDA
ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE
CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WILL BE
ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED
BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE
REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED
SEPARATELY.
1. Minutes of Meetings - December 13, 1988, January
4, 1989, January 10, 1989, January 24, 1989,
February 14, 1989
2. Request for Approval of Raffle Permit - William
Byrd High School Cheerleader Booster Club.
3. Request for acceptance of Twin Mountain Circle
into the Virginia Department of Transportation
Secondary System.
M. CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS
N. REPORTS
1. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance
2. General Fund Unappropriated Balance
3. Board Contingency Fund
4. Statement of Expenditures and Income Analysis -
September 30, 1989
p. EXECUTIVE SESSION pursuant to the Code of Virginia
Section 2.1-344
4
P. CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE SESSION
Q . ADJOURNMENT
ACTION N0.
ITEM NUMBER ~-~
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: October 24, 1989
AGENDA ITEM:_ Recognition of the Landfill Citizens Advisory
Committee for winning the Virginia Citizens Planning
Association Award
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The Virginia Citizens Planning Association recently announced
that the Roanoke County Landfill Citizens Advisory Committee was
the recipient of a 1989 VCPA Award. This award recognized the
part the LCAC played in the overall landfill siting process.
Attached is a copy of the application. Members of the Committee
will be present at the meeting.
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
------------------
ACTION VOTE
Approved ( ) Motion by: Yes No Abs
Denied ( ) Garrett
Received ( ) Johnson
Referred McGraw
Nickens
To• Robers
ROANOKE COUNTY~S LANDFILL CITIZENS
ADVISORY COMMITTEE
A nomination submitted for a 1989 VCPA Citizens Award
Submitted By:
Terrance L. Harrington, AICP
Director of Planning
Roanoke County Department of Planning
P.O. Box 29800
Roanoke County, VA 24018
C-•
~ VCPA AWARD NOMINATION:
Roanoke County's Landfill Citizens Advisory
Committee
"NOT IN MY BACK YARD!" How often have we heard this phrase?
Anyone who keeps informed of current events or who is involved with
local government needs no explanation of its meaning. NIMBY has
come to symbolize the legitimate expressions of citizens whg
attempt to influence, but often feel frustrated by, the land use
policy decisions of their elected representatives. Whether citizen
concerns are the protection of property values, or the preservation
of community values, they all too often are forced to be
articulated within the restricted limits of state mandatez
administrative processes and public hearings.
In recent years, there has been an increase in opportunitie`
for citizens to truly participate in the formulation of the
policies that affect their lives. In communities where this type
of progress has been shown, it has often not been the result ~
state mandates. Rather, it has been the result of local governing
bodies realizing that true citizen involvement can improve the
quality of, and increase the public's acceptance of, loca:
decisions. Roanoke County's Landfill Citizens Advisory Committee
is the County's most recent example of a series of initiatives
aimed at truly involving the community in decisions that affe~
their lives.
AN IIRGENT NEED
The Roanoke Valley is running out of room for its garbage
in 1992 the current regional landfill will close, conceivably eves
if a new site is not ready. Although the Valley's foir
jurisdictions (Roanoke County, Roanoke City, City of Salem and tb=
Town of Vinton) are committed to waste stream reduction, recycling,
and exploring other forms of waste disposal, a new landfill remain
a necessity and is the only economically feasible alternative s
the time for the Valley.
The search for a new landfill site began in early 1988. Tag.
existing Regional Landfill Board invited the adjacent counties z=
Bedford and Franklin to participate in the siting process, in t~
hopes that a truly regional solution to waste disposal could 3g
found. A regional approach also made financial sense - recey
changes in landfill development regulations issued by tag
Commonwealth's Department of Waste Management greatly increase tag
cost of developing and operating a landfill. These costs can ~
particularly acute for rural areas that may lack large ~
diversified tax bases.
When Bedford and Franklin counties chose not to participate
in the siting process, Roanoke County took the lead. Of the fog
jurisdictions in the Roanoke Valley, it is the only one that ~
significant areas that could be suitable for a landfill.
l_.. ,~
The County's Board of Supervisors realized early in the siting
process that locating a major landfill facility in the County would
be a challenge. Because of the mountainous terrain and related
geology of the County, a technically superior site might not be
possible. In addition, although rural areas of the County remain,
the rapid suburban development of the County over the past decade
ensured that a truly isolated area would be difficult to find.
Consultant services could be used to identify the best
technical sites in the County. However, those sites might possibly
conflict with the County's geography... sites that were technically
suitable could well be located near population pockets. To address
this potential conflict in siting criteria, the Board of
Supervisors chose a unique approach to finding a publicly
acceptable, and technically suitable landfill site - the Landfill
Citizens Advisory Committee.
THE LANDFILL CITIZENS ADVISORY COM[~ITTEE (LCAC)
The LCAC was appointed by the Board of Supervisors. Its
original membership was comprised of volunteer citizens from each
magisterial district in the County. The LCAC's charge was to
evaluate, identify, and weigh the criteria that should be used to
identify and rank potential landfill sites, and to recommend site
design standards and operating policies and procedures for the new
landfill once it was sited. This second aspect of the LCAC's
charge was in recognition that the design of landfills, and how
they are operated, can have a major impact on the quality of a
surrounding area.
Working with the assistance of County staff, and a consulting
engineer retained by the County to provide technical expertise, the
LCAC helped to identify and weigh the criteria used to site the
proposed landfill. The criteria identified were believed to be
unique to landfill siting processes in Virginia in that a
considerable number of the criteria were considered to be social
criteria. Whereas typically communities base landfill suitability
solely on technical and cost feasibility, the LCAC emphasized
identifying criteria aimed at controlling the impact of the
facility of the quality of life of the surrounding residents. In
applying weights to all of the criteria, the social criteria were
also emphasized.
Using the chosen criteria, and applying them within a
selection matrix, six priority sites were identified within the
County. The top two ranked sites were selected for further study,
and Department of Waste Management Part A permit applications. Now
that the top two sites were known, the Board of supervisors
increased the representativeness of the LCAC by appointing two
additional members; one from each area selected.
Once the six sites were ranked, the LCAC drafted a
±:,r:
,...
comprehensive report detailing recommended policies which the
members of the committee felt should be adopted by the Board.
After the LCAC finalized and released their report, a
subcommittee made up of some members of the I~CAC, county staff, and
members of the Planning Commission met to review the report and
make final recommendations to the Planning Commission and Board.
The subcommittee recommended making few changes to the I,CAC's
report and in selecting the LCAC's recommendations on the top two
landfill sites in the County, the Board of Supervisors adopted the
LCAC's report almost in its entirety. (See enclosed report)
This is the first time in the Commonwealth that citizens of
a community have had major input and meaningful involvement in the
planning, siting, and operation of a landfill. In addition to
selecting sites that are sensitive to quality of life
considerations, the work of the LCAC to develop the operating
conditions and policies adopted by the Board ensures that the
proposed landfill will be operated to protect the long term
interests of Roanoke County residents.
The conditions recommended by the LCAC and adopted by the
Board include regulations on the .type of waste that will be
accepted at the landfill, operating hours and controls,
environmental monitoring, site security, and screening and
buffering of the landfill area. The conditions are part of the
Special Exception permit approved by the Board, and are enforceable
as long as the landfill is in operation.
A particularly noteworthy condition recommended by the LCAC
and adopted by the Board was the condition that the landfill only
accept refuse from Roanoke Valley jurisdictions. The importance and
relevance of this condition has been somewhat heightened by the
recent efforts of Allegheny County to restrict out-of-state refuse
from being deposited in the private Kim-Stan facility.
The LCAC's recommended operating policies in many respects,
reflect the true value of citizen involvement in planning and
policy making. The operating policies adopted by the board upon
the LCAC's recommendation address quality of life issues in the
neighborhoods that will surround the proposed landfill. For
example, citizens within 1000 feet of the landfill boundary will
be eligible for the groundwater protection being offered. Their
wells will be tested before the landfill is operational, and then
periodically tested for water quality. If a well is contaminated
by the landfill a public water system will be provided at no
expense to the property owner, with free water service as long as
they reside at the property.
Perhaps the most significant operating policies address
property value protection and operational priorities. The LCAC
recommended, and the Board adopted, a series of operating policies
aimed at insuring that property owners around the landfill not lose
the equity in their land as a result of the landfill's siting and
~- i
operation. Specifically, property owners within 5000 feet of the
landfill's border will be eligible for property value compensation
if the owner decides to sell, and loses money as a result of the
landfill. If a citizen must sell his or her property for less than
the appraised value, the public agency operating the landfill will
be responsible for compensation if it can be shown that the
landfill is the cause of the property's devaluation.
The LCAC devoted considerable time to discussing recommended
operational priorities for the new landfill. A strong sentiment
on the committee was that the problems associated with many
existing landfills can be traced directly or indirectly to
operational policies that emphasize the minimization of operating
costs and tipping fees. The strategic analysis undertaken by the
LCAC led them to conclude that the long term interests of the
residents of the Roanoke Valley could best be protected by
establishing operational priorities that emphasized in priority
order:
1. The protection of the environment of the
Roanoke Valley.
2. Protection or extension of the useful life of
the landfill.
3. Protection of the interests of the residents
of the landfill host community.
4. Minimization of the landfill's operating costs
5. Minimization of the landfill's tipping fees.
The Board of
priorities.
A BALANCED PERSPECTIVE
Supervisors accepted these operational
As with many public processes or initiatives, the LCAC process
had its detractors. A small minority of property owners around the
selected top two sites stated that if social criteria had not been
considered, their site would not have been ranked so highly. They
argued that landfill siting "should be a technical process" based
upon the geologic characteristics of the land, and the minimization
of development costs.
Some members of the community have also expressed concern that
the Board of Supervisors has not yet accepted the LCAC's
recommendations on providing vehicular access to the top ranked
site. The LCAC, based upon preliminary information, had
recommended that a new access road be constructed to handle all
landfill related traffic. The Board, stating that more information
on cost and engineering feasibility was needed prior to making a
c- ~
commitment, has not yet accepted this recommendation of the LCAC.
The Board has, however, retained the services of an independent
consulting engineer to evaluate the feasibility of the new road.
A final decision will be based upon the consultant's report.
Finally, near the conclusion of the LCAC process, some members
of the LCAC and the Planning Commission expressed some reservations
that the operating policies developed by the LCAC and accepted by
the Board are binding only as a "moral obligation" and not as a
requirement of the land use approvals granted as part of the
Special Exception permit. While a majority of the Board was
apparently desirous of making these policies a requirement of law,
state law governing the actions of the Board prohibited them from
doing so. In adopting the policies, the Board made the strongest
possible commitment under current law, and made it clear that the
Supervisors considered the policies to be a moral obligation of
future Boards, as important as the obligation to provide fire and
rescue service, garbage collection, and the superior level of
education in County schools.
CONCLIISION
The Roanoke County Landfill Citizens Advisory Committee should
be seen as a model for citizen involvement in the siting of major
public facilities. It emerged from a local philosophy and
commitment that citizens should be actively involved in the major
planning and policy decisions that will affect their community.
The issues surrounding solid waste management will continue
to be found at the forefront of legislative agendas in the coming
decade. Planning efforts aimed at addressing these issues must
recognize the important role of citizen-based planning.
The keys to the success of the LCAC process were numerous .
First, the LCAC was a true citizen planning entity. It was not
created by the Board of Supervisors merely to react to staff
developed plans and policies. Rather, it participated as a full
partner in Roanoke County's efforts to plan for its waste disposal
needs for the coming decades. Second, the LCAC demonstrated that
it is possible for a citizen committee to go beyond the "Not In My
Back Yard" expressions of citizen frustration. By identifying and
selecting criteria, and evaluating alternatives, this citizen
planning committee identified and ranked proposed landfill sites
that balanced the needs of the Roanoke Valley with the interests
and needs of the residents of the affected areas. Finally, a key
to the success of the committee was the continued commitment of
the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors to the citizen planning
philosophy, and the benefits that have historically been derived
thereof.
~ .. 1
ACTION # A-102489-1
ITEM NUMBER
----~--L------
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD DF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY,
VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
f~IEETING DATE: October 24, 1989
AGENDA__ITEM: Request for Interstate 81 Corridor Study
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
~'r~'
~ ~~..~ ,
BACKGROUND: ~`~'"~'0'~'
In response to the rezoning requests recently submitted as part of the 1989
Economic Development Action Plan, the Planning Commission recognizes the
significant community resource the Interstate 81 corridor and interchanges
represents. They not only provide the primary gateway to Roanoke County,
but provide an opportunity for the continued economic vitality of the County.
However the Comprehensive Plan does not specifically address this special
resource nor provide sufficient detailed policy guidance fior these areas,
similar to the situation prior to the preparation and adoption of the 419
Corridor Plan. Therefore, future land use planning, marketing and
development should only be undertaken after a comprehensive evaluation of
this area is completed. A corridor plan will maximize its long term
strategic economic value with due consideration for other County goals.
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
On October 3, 1989 the Planning Commission adopted the attached resolution
supporting the fiunding and preparation of an analysis and plan for the
Interstate 81 corridor.
ALTERNAT_IVES_AND.IMPACTS:
Altern_atiye No. 1:
Authorize the Director of the Department of Planning and Zoning to negotiate
a professional services contract to undertake an Interstate 81 Corridor Study
in an amount not to exceed X25,000.
Alternative No,__2:
Proceed with future rezonings and development without the benefit of a
comprehensive corridor plan.
Fiscal Impact:
The X25,000 will need to be appropriated from the Unappropriated Balance.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Stafif recommends Alternative No. 1.
_~
SUBMITTED BY:
~;/
/' ' ; ii
-----~=----r=------~ ----- ----
Terrance .L. Harrington
Director, Depar~ ent of Planning
~.'
APPROVED BY:
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
------------ -----------------------------------------------
ACTION VOTE -----------
Approved ~ ) Motion by:__Amended motion_ _ No Yes Abs
Denied ( ) Steven A~._McGraw/R. W. R_o_b__e_
r
s Garrett
s x
Received ( ) _
_
_ _ _
to approve
Alt #1; wi_th
Johnson _ _
x~ ~
Referred ____
___ _
f_u_nding to_ b_e taken from the
McGraw
~ __
x
To _________.._._~ _
_
__
Economic Development_ Bud~t~ Nickens ~ __
~ x
for this mar, and that the Robers x
County Administrator extend
invitation to other governments
to participate. (including Montgomery
County)
cc: File
Terrance L. Harington, Director, Planning
John Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator
Timothy Gubala, Director, Economic Development
Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance
Reta Busher, Director, Management & Budget
i~"~`
A Resolution of the Roanoke County Planning Commission
Supporting the Funding and Preparation of an I-81
Corridor Analysis and Plan.
WHEREAS, the continued economic vitality of Roanoke County is
important to the long term ability of the County to provide basic
public services, and
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors has adopted policies aimed
at promoting the economic vitality of the County, and has directed
the staff to prepare strategies and programs aimed at implementing
these policies, and
WHEREAS, the Board has been presented the 1989 Economic
Development Action Plan by the Department of Economic Development,
and this plan has as a component a proposal to rezone to an
industrial classification significant acreage adjacent to, or near
Interstate 81, and
WHEREAS, the Interstate 81 corridor is the primary gateway to
Roanoke County, and a significant community resource that should
be analyzed, promoted and utilized in the County's comprehensive
development efforts, and
WHEREAS, future land use planning, marketing and development
of land near Interstate 81 should be undertaken only after a
comprehensive evaluation of the characteristics of this valuable
resource including the vacant land areas adjacent to=or nearby, so
as to maximize its long term and strategic economic value with due
consideration for other County goals.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Roanoke County Planning
Commission believes that an Interstate 81 Corridor Study is of
paramount importance to Roanoke County if we are to professionally,
and strategically move forward towards achieving our economic
development goals and objectives.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Roanoke County Planning
Commission respectfully requests that the Board of Supervisors
authorize the staff to negotiate a professional services contract
with the Fifth Planning District Commission or other private
professional services firm to undertake an Interstate 81 Corridor
Study, and that the Board appropriate the funding necessary to
prepare the study in an amount not to exceed $25,000.
Adopted this 3rd Day of October, 1989
oC9.~P ~ ~.~(
Donald R. Witt,
Chairman
Terrance~L. Harrington,
Secretary
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
ON TUESDAY, OCTOBER 24, 1989
RESOLUTION 102489-2 RATIFYING CERTAIN TERMS OF
$1,115,00 GENERAL OBLIGATION SCHOOL BONDS, SERIES 1989,
OF THE COUNTY OF ROANORE, VIRGINIA
WHEREAS, this Board adopted an ordinance on September 12, 1989
("Ordinance"), authorizing the issuance and sale of $1,115,000
General Obligation School Bonds, Series 1989, of the County of
Roanoke, Virginia, ("Bonds") setting forth the form and details
thereof and directing the County Administrator to accept the
maturities and interest rates for the Bonds established by the
Virginia Public School Authority;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
1. The maturities and interest rates on the Bonds
established by the County Administrator in the attached Certificate
as to Interest Rates are hereby approved and ratified.
2. The Board determines that if it is in the best interests
of the County to participate in the State Non-Arbitrage Program
and to deposit the proceeds of the Bonds in the State Non-Arbitrage
Program Pool I ("SNAP Pool I") pursuant to the Contract, dated as
of January 16, 1989, creating the SNAP Pool I and such Contract is
approved. The Treasurer and the County Administrator, or either
of them, is each authorized to execute on behalf of the County such
contracts and documents as may be necessary for such purpose.
3. This resolution shall take effect immediately. The
undersigned Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of the County of
Roanoke, Virginia, hereby certifies that the foregoing constitutes
a true and correct copy of a resolution duly adopted at a meeting
of the Board of Supervisors duly called and held on
October 24, 1989.
On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor
Nickens, and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisor Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTE:
`~'`1 c~-i_ ~-~-~ ~ ~,~,~st_~
Mary H. Allen, Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
Dated: October 24, 1989
cc: File
Bond Counsel
Circuit Court Judge
Ruth Ward, School Board Clerk
Alfred C. Anderson, County Treasurer
Don Myer, Assistant County Administrator
Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance
f'
ITEM NUMBER w~
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: October 24, 1989
AGENDA ITEM: Ratification of Certain Terms of $1,115, 000
General Obligation School Bonds.
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~ ..~
~ .-,
BACKGROUND:
On September 12, 1989, the Board authorized the issuance and
sale of $1,115,000 General Obligation School Bonds through the
Virginia Public School Authority. These bonds will be sold on
October 19, 1989.
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
It is necessary to ratify the interest rate and other terms
related to these school bonds. Attached is a draft resolution
that will be used to approve these terms. The Bonds will be sold
on October 19, 1989 and the completed Resolution will be
distributed at the Board Meeting.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Debt service for this issue has been included in the 1989-90
approved budget.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the Board approve the attached Resolution
ratifying terms of the $1,115,000 General Obligation School Bond.
Diane D. Hyatt
Director of Finance
G~
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
~~
Approved ( )
Denied ( )
Received ( )
Referred
To
Motion by:
ACTION
Garrett
Johnson
McGraw
Nickens
Robers
VOTE
No Yes Abs
~~
CERTIFICATE AS TO INTEREST RATES
The undersigned County Administrator hereby accepts the
following maturities and annual interest rates for the County of
Roanoke, Virginia $1,115,000 General Obligation School Bonds,
Series 1989, as established by the Virginia Public School
Authority, in accordance with the ordinance of the Board of
Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia adopted
September 12, 1989.
Year of
Maturitv Amount
1990 $
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
Interest Rate
Year of
Maturitv
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
Amount Interest Rate
0
Dated: October 19, 1989
County Administrator
County of Roanoke, Virginia
A RESOLUTION RATIFYING CERTAIN TERMS OF
$1,115,00 GENERAL OBLIGATION SCHOOL BONDS, SERIES 1989,
OF THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA
WHEREAS, this Board adopted an ordinance on September 12, 1989
("Ordinance ), authorizing the issuance and sale of $1,115,000
General Obligation School Bonds, Series 1989, of the County of
Roanoke, Virginia, ("Bonds") setting forth the form and details
thereof and directing the County Administrator to accept the
maturities and interest rates for the Bonds established by the
Virginia Public School Authority;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
1. The maturities and interest rates on the Bonds
established by the County Administrator in the attached Certificate
as to Interest Rates are hereby approved and ratified.
2. The Board determines that if it is in the best interests
of the County to participate in the State Non-Arbitrage Program
and to deposit the proceeds of the Bonds in the State Non-Arbitrage
Program Pool I ("SNAP Pool I") pursuant to the Contract, dated as
of January 16, 1989, creating the SNAP Pool I and such Contract is
approved. The Treasurer and the County Administrator, or either
of them, is each authorized to execute on behalf of the County such
contracts and documents as may be necessary for such purpose.
3. This resolution shall take effect immediately. The
undersigned Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of the County of
Roanoke, Virginia, hereby certifies that the foregoing constitutes
a true and correct copy of a resolution duly adopted at a meeting
of the Board of Supervisors duly called and held on
October 24, 1989.
Dated:
Clerk, Board of Supervisors of
the County of Roanoke, Virginia
.:.~ -~.
CERTIFICATE AS TO INTEREST RATES
The undersigned County Administrator hereby accepts the
following maturities and annual interest rates for the County of
Roanoke, Virginia $1,115,000 General Obligation School Bonds,
Series 1989, as established by the Virginia Public School
Authority, in accordance with the ordinance of the Board of
Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia adopted
September 12, 1989.
Year of
Maturity
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
Dated: October , 1989
Amount Interest Rate
$75,000 6.80%
75,000 6.80
75,000 6.80
75,000 6.80
75,000 6.80
75,000 6.80
75,000 6.85
75,000 6.85
75,000 6.85
75,000 6.85
75,000 7.10
75,000 7.10
75,000 7.10
70,000 7.10
70,000 7.10
County Administrator
County of Roanoke, Virginia
1
ACTION NO.
ITEM NO.
Gi-7
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: October 24, 1989
AGENDA ITEM: Requests for Public Hearing and
First Reading for
Rezoning Ordinances
Consent Agenda
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
BACKGROUND•
The first reading on these ordinances is accomplished by
adoption of these ordinances in the manner of consent agenda items.
The adoption of these items does not imply approval of the
substantive content of the requested zoning actions, rather
approval satisfies the procedural requirements of the County
Charter and schedules the required public hearing and second
reading of these ordinances. The second reading and public hearing
on these ordinances is scheduled for November 28, 1989.
The titles of these ordinances are as follows:
1• An ordinance to amend the Future Land Use Plan mad
designation of approximately 54 acres located west of
Hollins Road and south of Lois Lane in the Hollins
Magisterial District from Development to Principal
Industrial and to change the zoning classification R-1
to the zoning classification M-1 for industrial purposes
with conditions upon the application of the Board of
Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia.
2. An ordinance to change the zoning classification of
approximately 15 acres of real estate located at the end
of Benois Road in the Cave Spring Magisterial District
from the zoning classification of R-1 to the zoning
classification of M-1 for industrial development with
conditions upon the application the Board of Supervisors
of Roanoke County, Virginia.
3. An ordinance to change the zoning classification of
approximately 35 acres of real estate generally located
south of I-81 and west of Plantation Road in the Hollins
G--~
2
Magisterial District from the zoning classification of
R-1 to the zoning classification of M-1 for mixed-use
development with conditions upon the application of the
Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia.
4. An ordinance to change the zoning classification of
approximately 8 acres of real estate located at the
southeast corner of the intersection of State Route 643
and I-81 in the Catawba Magisterial District from the
zoning classification of B-2 to the zoning classification
of M-1 for industrial development with conditions upon
the application of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia.
5. An ordinance to amend the Future Land Use Plan map
designation of approximately 25 acres located east of
Carvins Cove Dam Road and immediately north I-81 in the
Catawba Magisterial District from Development to
Principal Industrial.
6. An ordinance to change the zoning classification of
approximately 125 acres of real estate located south of
Routes 11 and 460, south and west of Barley Drive and the
N&W Railway in the Catawba Magisterial District from the
zoning classification A-1MH to M-1 for industrial
development with conditions upon the application of the
Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia.
7. An ordinance to issue a Use-Not-Provided-For-Permit with
conditions upon application of Gregory Pierce to operate
a training/education center on approximately 72 acres of
real estate located northwest of the intersection of
Routes 637 and 631 in the Windsor Hills Magisterial
District.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends as follows:
(1) That the Board approve and adopt the first reading of
these rezoning ordinances for the purpose of scheduling
the second reading and public hearing for September 26,
1989.
(2) That this section of the agenda be, and hereby is,
approved and concurred in as to each item separately set
forth as Items 1-7, inclusive, and that the Clerk is
authorized and directed where required by law to set
forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation
for any such item pursuant to this action.
G-i -7
3
Respectfully submitted,
~~
Paul M. Mahoney
County Attorney
Action
Approved ( )
Denied ( )
Received ( )
Referred
to
Motion by
Garrett
Johnson
McGraw
Nickens
Robers
Vote
No Yes Abs
1
ROANOKE COUNTY REZONING APPLICATION
uate xec.:
Received By:
Case No.:
Ord. No.:
~ -/
1. Owner' s Name : / ~f0 Phone : 7 3~1~ S- 2 /08
Address : drl 1 ~ H tit S ~ ~ilgc.~ (~, ~~-~,~,-+~,~ (~/~ 2 qO ~ 2
2. Applicant's Name:
~~ ~ ~Se~S Phone
Address: ~~pp
3. Location of Property:_ 770 ~~fN S ~~
Tax Map Number (s j : '39 , Q 9 / -~ ~ 2,
4. Magisterial District:_ ~p ~~/N S'
5. Size of Property: ,~y /~a~,~
6. Existing Zoning:_ ~~' Avis/~Ltc~ 2- l
Existing Land Use: VGl
7. Proposed Zoning: ~S ~ ~~~'~ ~ _ ~ ¢
Proposed Land Use: ~~a'~~~~~'Q ~,~Q,(,~y1,ju,,~~ ~~~~~~~
8. Comprehensive Plan Designation:
9. Are Conditions Proffered With This Request? Yes No
(If you are voluntarily offering proffers as a
tion, these proffers must be in trr'~t~n P~'t of your' applica-
Staff can assist you in the prepar'at.ton9of hes ~roffers.) P1~~9
10. Value of Land and (Proposed) Buildings:
il. The Following Items Must Be Submitted With This Application. Please
Check If Enclosed. Application Will Not Be Accepted If Any Of These
Items Are IKissinq Or Incomplete:
Letter of Application Concept Plan
Metes and Bounds Description List of Adjacent Owners
of Property (Attach Exhibit A) Vicinity Map
Application Fee Written Proffers
Water and Sewer Application (If Applicable)
12. Signature Of Property Owner, Contract Purchaser,
Or Owner's Agen •
Signature ~~
Date 9.Z~~'
F.ic!~(NI~F
~:
~~
2
a
18 ~~ 88
gFSQU1CENTENN~P~
A Btauti~ul Beginning
~ Y.~~ a.:y ,~
~ ~~ ~:,,
t, ~.
.t ~-:
DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT SEP ,`~$ I989
M E M O RAND U M
vi:~J t i
~'~'P"~+~ti~ C~J ~~Y
-~~
TO: Terry Harrington, Director, Planning and Zoning
FROM: '
Timothy Gubala, Director, Economic Development
DATE: September 25, 1989
SUBJECT: Rezoning application - Friendship Manor, Inc.
On behalf of the Board of Supervisors I am submitting an
application for the rezoning of approximately 54.11 acres from
Residential District R-1 to Industrial District M-1. This property
is one of several evaluated as part of the 1989 study of potential
industrial sites that was initiated by the Board of Supervisors.
Please note that the Concept Plan and water and sewer application
are not included because there is not a user for the property.
Rezoning of the property must precede the detailed site planning.
Proffered conditions are as follows:
1. The property will not include permitted uses for:
a. Automobile painting, upholstering, repairing, rebuilding,
reconditioning, body and fender work, truck repairing,
or overhauling;
b. Manufacture of pottery and figurines or other similar
ceramic products;
c. Veterinary hospital and commercial kennels with exterior
runs and yards;
d. Flea markets, unless a special exception has been granted
by the Board of Supervisors.
e. Seed and feed stores.
2. A new access point will be developed from Hollins Road to
provide access to the property.
Please advise me with your comments and questions.
Thank you.
Attachment
P.O. BOX 29800 • ROANOKE . VIRGINIA 24018-0798 (703) 772-2069
FAX. NO.: (703) 772-2030
ao~wo~.F
~. .p
Z
a~
18 '~° 88
S~SCUICEtiTENN~P~
A Bcauti~u/Beginning
Cn~~t~~ ,ark ~~ ~r~~ ~~~,.~
.,~'~ h.
vy ~4.„ ~`
DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPM ~.~•tr
SEP ~S 1989
MEMO RANDIIM '~~ ~•~~."~~~:~u,~vt~
R~~~.~ui~+d~ ~L ~~~'
TO: Terry Harrington, Director, Planning and Zoning
FROZi: Timothy W. Gubala, Director, Economic Development I'/~
DATE: September 21, 1989
SOBJECT: Land Use Plan Amendment for Friendship Manor, Inc. on
Hollins Road
Background•
Friendship Manor has owned the property since 1987. Roanoke County
Economic Development staff evaluated this site as being a potential
industrial site and recommended that the Board of Supervisors amend
the Comprehensive Plan and rezone the property so that it could be
used for future industrial development.
Requested Land Use Plan Amendment•
It is requested that the Comprehensive Plan be amended from
Development to Principal Industrial.
Effect of the Amendment on Surrounding Properties
The site lies above Old Hollins Road. Across the road to the east
are several industrial uses. Property to the south includes a
residence and a commercial greenhouse. Property to the west across
Carvin's Creek is a residential subdivision. Large lot residential
uses lie to the north. Buffering and existing screening should be
maintained to protect the proposed industrial use from adjacent
residential areas. A new access point should be developed that
will keep industrial traffic away from residential uses.
Reasons for the Amendment:
The Roanoke Valley is deficient in "ready to go" industrial sites
to offer to prospective industrial clients from within and outside
the Commonwealth. The Board of Supervisors adopted strategy for
FY 89-90 is to take action to encourage industrial site development
through changes in land use and zoning, water and sewer extensions
and long range highway planning. Opportunities for public-
private partnerships exist to implement site development by the
private sector.
P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE . VIRGINIA 24018-0798 (703> 772-2069
FAX. NO.: (703> 772-2030
Old Hollins Road (Route 601) is scheduled for Secondary Road
improvements in FY 92-93 to handle increased traffic from recent
area development. Improvements will enhance economic development
opportunities on other vacant industrial tracts along the road.
Since this site is in single ownership, site development can be
controlled and managed in a positive manner. This site is best
used for one or two large industrial users.
Justification for the Amendment:
Existing Land Use Pattern - Industrial development along Old
Hollins Road.
Existing Zoning - Residential along the west side of Old Hollins
Road and Industrial on the east.
Potential Industrial Site - Included within the 1981 and 1985
studies and included within the 1989 study initiated by the Board
of Supervisors.
Topography - Site is within the 10~ slope criteria land use
determinant.
Water supply - Water supply is off site in Hollins Road. Current
water storage improvements at the Belleview Gardens storage tank
will increase pressures for industrial users. Anew water line is
proposed to extend from AMP on Hollins Road to Plantation Road by
1992.
Sewer service - Across Old Hollins Road and in Tinker Creek.
ccess - A new access point should be located to serve the property
from Old Hollins Road.
Transportation Center - Close proximity to Plantation Road.
Urban sector - Property is within Urban Service Sector.
• ~ ~o
~ b'
~.~~• ~3
. 'fr..
•'•~:
~''f /
•u~~
• ~ J ~
~~~~
M.JdL ~
i~"
1~~
.~~M~'IOr . ,7
•-.. 7
a
r Ctrl 1 E; .;;i .:....;;3=
L
.N
/
~:~;' ~ _
~
t
' ~-:+
:
~1}::: _
y
y..
.'~
.. r. ~~.
i':P"
Site name: Friendship Manor
Size: 54 acres
Zoning:
Comprehensive
Plan Designation:
Access:
Water:
Sewer:
Availability:
Recommendation:
Fiscal Impact:
R1
Development
Hollins Road
Off site
Off site, across road
Property owners are willing to sell site for
industrial use.
Amend Comprehensive Plan to Principal
Industrial.
Rezone property to M1.
Complete Hollins Road improvements.
Extend water line to improve pressure.
1992 for water improvements; 1992-93 for VDOT
improvements.
z ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~ ~~ ~~~Yt~r~.~e
z ~
a
DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
18 ~l 88
SFSQUICENTENN~P~
A $cauti~u.'$eginning
M E M O RAND II M
TO: Terry Harrington, Director of Planning & Zoning
FROM: Timothy W. Gubala, Director of Economic Development
DATE: September 25, 1989
SIIB.7ECT: Suggested proffers related to the rezoning application
for the Atlantic Concrete site
Suggested proffers:
1. The property will not include permitted uses for:
a. Automobile painting, upholstering, repairing, rebuilding,
reconditioning, body and fender work, truck repairing or
overhauling;
b. Manufacturing of pottery and figurines or other similar
ceramic products;
c. Veterinary hospital and commercial kennels with exterior
runs and yards;
d. Flea markets, unless a special exception has been granted
by the Board of Supervisors.
e. Seed and feed stores.
P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE . VIRGINIA 24018-0798 (703> 772-2069
FAX. NO.: (703) 772-2030
Site name: Phoenix Concrete
Size: 34 acres
Zoning: M2
Comprehensive
Plan Designation: Principal Industrial
Access: Benois Road
Water: Off site
Sewer: Off site
Availability: Owners are willing to allow Roanoke
County to market and sell the
property at a specified price per
acre.
Recommendation: Water to be extended to the site.
Sewer to be extended to the site.
Benois Road or new Terminal Road
guarded RR grade crossing to be
constructed from VDOT Secondary Road
fund. (1993-94)
Fiscal Impact: (1990) For water/sewer improvements
and extension of Commonwealth Drive
(1993-94) For VDOT road improvements
uate KeC.:
,~„ , • . _ Received By:
Case No.:
Ord. No.:
ROANOKS COUNTY RE7,ONING APPLICATION
1-~-~ta~~.~C.. Grv~cr~~ ~ cr
1. Owner's Name: Phone:
-T
Address: /'. y. ~J~ SS /~~.t,.aK (~/r ZYVI ~
2. Applicant's Name: V~%~Giln..e~ ~Lft~i~ fig ~sS~-S Phone: 7?2-2005
Address:~l~. ~~X Z~ Ge, JA 2,tiJ ~ J -U7s$
3. Location of Property:
Tax Map Number(s):
4. Magisterial District:
5. Size of Property: 3S•31
6. Existing Zoning:
12- 1
a'kt.Gt
Existing Land Use: V'Q~;~•~
7. Proposed Zoning: m "~
Proposed Land Use: (/ytO~u.ShcA.~ OCG/
8 . Comprehensive Plan Designation: Y nu -~~~''~s
9. Are Conditions Proffered With This Request? Yes No
(If you are voluntarily offering proffers as a part of your applica-
tion, these proffers must be is r~riting. A member of the Planning
Staff can assist you in the preparation of these proffers.)
10. Value of Land and (Proposed) Buildings:
il. The Following Items Must Be Submitted With This Application. Please
Check If Enclosed. Application Will Not Be Accepted If Any Of These
Ite/ms Are Missing Or Incomplete:
--~'l/ Letter of Application Concept Plan
Metes and Bounds Description ~~ List of Adjacent Owners
of Property (Attach Exhibit A) -~~ Vicinity Map
N R' Application Fee Written Proffers
Water and Sewer Application (If Applicable)
12. Signature Of Property Owner, Contract Purchaser,
Or Owner's Agen ~-- f
Signature ~~/~ ~ ~`=rt.! '~' Date
P~94/S
/~ ~3-Z
S~.~o-2'7.8
S
~ aoan-o~.~ ~
~~t~~Yt~ ~~ ~~~
~Yt~~t~
p 2
a
1S 88 DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
YE
sFSabICENTENN~P~ M E M O R A N D U M
A Btauti ful Beginning
TO: Terry Harrington, Director, Planning and Zoning
FROM: Timothy Gubala, Director, Economic Development /
'1~
DATE: September 22, 1989
SUBJECT: Rezoning application - Atlantic Concrete
On behalf of the Board of Supervisors, I am submitting this
application for the rezoning of approximately 15± acres from
Single Family Residential District R-1 to Light Industrial District
M-1. As you know, this property is one of several evaluated as
part of the 1989 study of potential industrial sites that was
initiated by the Board of Supervisors.
The R1 designation was given to a portion of the land owned by
Atlantic Concrete, Incorporated to provide a buffer to any future
residential development. The remainder of the acreage in this
tract is zoned M-2. By rezoning the property to M-1 Light
Industrial District, an appropriate user would provide a buffer to
the potential M-2 users who may have a number of outdoor
activities.
Please note that this application does not include a Concept Plan
nor a water and sewer application. Clifford Craig has been
consulted extensively about this site and feels that water and
sewer services could be extended to the site. The lack of a
Concept Plan reflects the owners understanding of the ever changing
business environment and would like the opportunity to market this
site which is adjacent to the Southwest Industrial Park, as an
entire tract of a subdividable tract depending on the needs of
business.
As you know, the Southwest Industrial Park is now completely sold
out. As you also know, the Board of Supervisors has authorized the
extension of Commonwealth Drive through Southwest Industrial Park
and to the property line of the site in question. By rezoning this
property, the development that has been successful in Southwest
Industrial Park will be able to continue in an appropriate
surrounding.
Finally, this is a request for a rezoning of a portion of a tract.
The owner is having a metes and bounds description prepared and
will forward this to your office when completed.
Attachment
P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE . VIRGINIA 24018-0798 • (703) 772-2069
FAX. NO.: (703) 772-2030
.~.
`°
ROANOKB COUNTY REZONING APPLIC~.TION
1. Owner's Name:
uate xec.:
Received By:
Case No.:
Ord. No.:
G_3 a
r~ , ~
Address : /~.Q. Q~~ /y/ y t /'So~tN~.~ y.4 L yos~
2. Applicant's Name: Q~ i Phone: 77Z-ZVof
Address : ~~C~ ~o x Z 9.YuJ /> L)/`~7/JK~. L~ 2 y~/8-V~ S~
3. Location of Property:~~'DN d-~ =~l ~, ~o-~,Gv'~~ ~(7 ~~~P~~c~t~i,v/~
Tax Map Number (s) : _ l~, /~ - f -/
4. Magisterial District: ~~ ~~f~5
5. Size of Property:_ ~j5.O~f
6. Existing Zoning:__ ~S ~i,S~~~ 2-~
Existing Land Use: U
7 .
Proposed Zoning: JJ~ .w, U
vl 1~.~~a~ n_ A/
QQ,B~,f /yl - /
Proposed Land Use: (~ f~~ 4~~~ ~ L~f~tt8~
~
P
8. Comprehensive Plan Designation: rIY!
~GcS
9. Are Conditions Proffered With This Request? Yes No
(If you are voluntarf 1 y offering proffers as a part of your appl~ca-
t.ion, these proffers must be .in t~-z-~t~ng. A member of the Planning
Staff can assist you In the preparation of t/~hese pro1flfers.)
10. Value of Land and (Proposed) Buildings:~j~ KnJ~~I KY~ ~ `~n~~
11. The Following Items Must Be Submitted With This Application. Please
Check If Enclosed. Application Will Not Be Accepted If Any Of These
Items Are Missing Or Incomplete:
Letter of Application Concept Plan
Metes and Bounds Description -~- List of Adjacent Owners
of Property (Attach Exhibit A) -,7 Vicinity Map
Application Fee Written Proffers
__. Water and Sewer Application (If Applicable)
12. Signature Of Property Owner, Contract Purchaser,
Or Owner's Age --
S i nature ~~[/
S date -~j`~~r
O~ aOANp,I,~
~. ;
Z ~~
a
18 ~~ 88
SFSQUfCENTENN~P~
A Bcauti(ul Beginning
~ ,~ i~` ~ ;A ~.
~ .~~ ~
~:~:h~
DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ~~~=%y
SEP ~5 19gg
M E M O RAND II M
~~~~t}~tE ~~~+u;l~t,~
TO: Terry Harrington, Director, Planning and Zoning
FROM: Timothy Gubala, Director, Economic Development !~
DATE: September 21, 1989
SIIBJECT: Rezoning application - Household of Faith
On behalf of the Board of Supervisors, I am submitting this
application for the rezoning of approximately 35 acres from Single
Family Residential District R1 to Light Industrial District M1.
This property is one of several sites that the Board of Supervisors
noted in the 1989 industrial sties study. As you know, this study
identified several sites for potential industrial use as well as
the necessary action needed to provide ready-to-locate sites to
prospects.
Please note that the Concept Plan and water and sewer applications
are not included. At this time, it is not clear if there will be
one user or a number of users. Also, the landowners are not
interested in developing the site but marketing it to potential
industrial users.
Finally, it is my understanding that the Commercial Committee is
looking at this area through its interchange study and may come up
with a unique set of site development conditions. Therefore, it
would be best to wait for this information before preparing a
Concept Plan.
Mr. Clifford Craig is aware of this site's industrial development
potential and has discussed the possibility of improving water
service to the area in the near future.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me.
Thank you.
sbo
Attachment
P.O. BOX 29800 • ROANOKE . VIRGINIA 24018-0798 (703) 772-2069
FAX. NO.: (703) 772-2030
O~ ROAMprF
z~ ~~
a
s1~~.~~
~SQUICENTENN~p
A Bcautiful Bcginning
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
C~n~tn~~ of ~vttnnkr
DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
M E M O R A N D U M
Terry Harrington, Director, Planning and Zoning
Timothy W. Gubala,~/Pilrector, Economic Development
cAr,tPmber 25, 1989
SIIH.TECT: Suggested proffers related to the rezoning application
for the Household of Faith property
1. Suggested proffers:
a. Automobile painting, upholstering, repairing, rebuilding,
reconditioning, body and fender work, truck repairing or
overhauling;
b. Manufacturing or assembling of products from the
following:
Material, leather and straw;
c. Veterinary hospital and commercial kennels with exterior
runs and yards;
d. Flea markets, unless a special exception has been granted
by the Board of Supervisors.
e. Seed and feed stores.
2. Access to the property will be from Plantation Road.
3. Restrictive covenants governing building design will be
recorded for property owners prior to the issuance of a
building permit.
Please contact me should you have any questions.
P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24018-0798 <703) 772-2069
FAX. NO.: (703) 772-2030
Site name: Household of Faith
Size: 35 acres
Zoning: R1 ___ ___
Comprehensive
Plan Designation: Principal Industrial
Access: Carvin Street and easement to Plantation Road
Water: Off site
Sewer: Off site
Availability: Owners are trying to sell the property, but
there is an access problem to Plantation Road.
Recommendation: The property should be rezoned to Industrial
District M1. Roanoke County to improve area
water service with new storage tank and water
lines.
Fiscal Impact: 1991 for water improvements.
M
- Date Rec.:
' Received By:
Case No.:
Ord. No.:
ROANORE COUNTY REZONING APPLICATION /'^
~7 ~"
1. Owner's Name: ~,4;(/p/."~_ C_...oun~y /,~j~r-~a! Sc,de,~, r, Phone: 77t-Lyo/
Address: /; (7 /.SAX z 9~17U /fo~9.yofe. ~/f? 240/F~-y7~8
2. Applicant's Name:_1i~i~~„ ~,. Gu~it~~ Phone:7~L-LJ 7V
Address: /~(7 /~~ 29~~0 ~afi~o`e, ~~9 Lya/s-0798
3. Location of Property:~~~ COrvc~ ~~ Sf ~f d y3 ~9,c% ~ -,4/ / ~lP,~t(9/ ~~a7"I
Tax Map Number (s) : SS, 0 9 -/ - Ly
4. Magisterial District: ~~q~,.r,~,~
5. Size of Property: 8,/?y ,q-Gr s
6. Existing Zoning: ~-Z/ (,a,~~ia/ Ca,~," e
Existing Land Use:
7. Proposed Zoning: /1'!-/ ~L;,~ f .~H~. ~,k~
Proposed Land Use:
8. Comprehensive Plan Designation: flare.
9. Are Conditions Proffered With This Request? Yes ~ No
(If you are voluntarily offering proffers as a part of your applica-
tion, these proffers must be in ~•riting. A member of the Planning ~
Staff can assist you in the preparation of these)I p1roffers. )
10. Value of Land and (Proposed) Buildings: ~I~ewa aT ~ ~ti~.a...
11. The Following Items Must Be Submitted With This Application. Please
Check If Enclosed. Application Will Not Be Accepted If Any Of These
Items Are Kissinq Or Incomplete:
Letter of Application Concept Plan
Metes and Bounds Description ,/ List of Adjacent Owners
of Property (Attach Exhibit A) ,/ Vicinity Map
Application Fee ~_ Written Proffers
Water and Sewer Application (If A~aplicable)
12. Signature Of Property Owner, Contract Purchaser,
Or Owner's Agen
Signature 1.~./ • Date -2S
~ 7
a nN ~.
~. ~=
Z
a
18 88
$~sQU1CENTENN~P`'
A Beauti~ul Btginning
,fir ~`` ,:~' , „_~
V..
DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT SEP 25 19$9
M E M O R A N D U M ~'lAR'f~~(~&,"Z~~li~tia utvi"irPWT$
D(~ A}tid~ tnsvinl l
TO: Terry Harrington, Director of Planning and Zonin~~/~,~
FROM: Timothy Gubala, Director, Economic Development Vv~`
DATE: September 25, 1989
SU&7ECT: Rezoning application - Shamrock
On behalf of the Board of Supervisors, I am submitting an
application for the rezoning of approximately 8.134 acres from
General Commercial District B-2 to Light Industrial District M-1.
This property is being considered by two companies that require
the M-1 zoning designation.
Please note that the Concept Plan is not included. Although two
prospects are looking at this property, neither is able at this
time to offer such a plan. However, this department will require
a Concept Plan at or near the point of sale. Additionally, there
will be several conditions attached to sale of the property. You
may have a copy of this if you wish.
At this time, we did not include a water and sewer application.
Clifford Craig is aware of the possible sale of this land and has
verbally informed us that water and sewer should be available. As
soon as we know which industry (if not both) decides to purchase
the site, this application will be sent to Clifford Craig.
Finally, although a metes and bounds description is on the
acompanying plat prepared by Robert S. Lang of Balzer & Associates,
a prepared written description is not yet available. However, such
a description is being prepared by Mr. Lang. This document will
follow shortly.
Please advise me with your comments and questions. Thank you.
sbo
Attachment
P.O. BOX 29800 • ROANOKE . VIRGINIA 24018-0798 • (703) 772-2069
FAX. NO.: (703> 772-2030
)!
~ a arv ~,~ ~.-
o ~
v a
18 u~ $8 DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
sFSQU1CENTENN\P\'
ABcautifulBcginning M E M O RAND U M
TO: Terry Harrington, Director, Planning and Zoning ~
FROM: Timothy W. Gubala, Director, Economic Development ~~~,
DATE: September 25, 1989
SIIBJECT: Suggested proffers related to the rezoning application
for the Shamrock site
Suggested proffers:
The following uses shall be prohibited from this site:
a. Automobile painting, upholstering, repairing, rebuilding,
reconditioning, body and fender work, truck repairing or
overhauling;
b. Manufacturing or assembling of products from the
following material: cloth, leather and straw;
c. Manufacturing of pottery and figurines or other similar
ceramic products, using clay, and kilns;
d. Seed and feed stores;
e. Veterinary hospital and commercial kennels with exterior
runs and yards; and,
f. Flea markets, unless a special exception has been granted
by the Board of Supervisors.
P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE . VIRGINIA 24018-0798 (703) 772-2069
FAX. NO.: (703> 772-2030
VICINITY *~1P
SHAD20CK FIELD
a nN ~
o
ti ~ p
2 ~
~ _
a~
18 '~ 88
~~BQUICENTENNIP~'
A BeautifulBtginning
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
~"
6 c ~Y t t ~ ~ { 1+~ k'.
t~ ~-
c, ", „
DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT SEP `''• r ••~ •
2s is
M E M O RAND Q M
89
;~'Ti'
Terry Harrington, Director, Department of Planning and
Zoning
Timothy W. Gubala, Director, Economic Development ~
September 21, 1989 ~-l
SOBJECT: Land Use Plan Amendment for Hollins College Corporation
Background•
Hollins College Corporation is the owner of a 163 acre tract of
land that lies within both Roanoke and Botetourt Counties. During
1983, the property was petitioned to be rezoned to Industrial
District M-1 in both counties. The rezoning was approved and the
property rezoned to M-1 with proffered conditions.
During the mid 1980~s, Botetourt County amended its Comprehensive
Plan to classify the portion of the property lying within that
county as industrial. The approximate 25 acre portion lying within
Roanoke County was classified as Development during the 1986
Comprehensive Plan update.
Roanoke County Economic Development staff evaluated this site as
being a potential industrial site and recommended that the Board
of Supervisors amend the Comprehensive Plan so the property can be
used for future industrial development.
Requested Land Use Plan Amendment
The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors request on behalf of the
property owners, that the approximate 25 acre tract (identified as
being a part of Tax Map 18.00) be changed to Principal Industrial
on the Roanoke County Land Use Plan.
Effect of the Amendment on surrounding properties
The Economic Development staff is of the opinion that the proposed
Land Use Plan Amendment will have no effect on surrounding
~:~roperties. Property located immediately tc~ yh~ ~rortheast is
classified as Industrial in the Botetourt County Comprehensive
Plan. Property to the south beyond Interstate I-81 is owned by
Hollins College. Property to the west is classified as Principal
Industrial by the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan.
P.O. BOX 29800 • ROANOKE . VIRGINIA 24018-0798 • (703) 772-2069
~~~~~ ! /~~ n FAX. NO.: (703) 772-2030
easons for the Amendmen
The Plan Amendment will allow all the Hollins College Corporation
property in both counties to be classified as industrial for
marketing and long range facility planning purposes. It is the
intent of the Economic Development staff to have water system
improvements included as part of the utility Capital Improvement
Plan for Fiscal Year 1991-92.
Road access improvements to the site would be needed to handle
anticipated traffic volumes. Carvins Cove Dam Road needs to be
widened as well as an engineering review of the current I-81 Exit
43 off ramp at Plantation Road. It is anticipated that VDOT
Secondary Road funds would not be available until 1995-96.
Justification for the amendment from Land Use determinants:
Existing zoning - The property is zoned Industrial District
M-1.
Existinct Land Use Pattern - No pattern established for this
property, but area zoning and land use south of Exit 43 on
Plantation Road is industrial. The property is north of the North
County industrial area indicated in the Future Land Use Plan.
Potential industrial sites - The property could be used for several
large industrial or corporate users.
Employment Centers - The property is near the North County
Industrial area that has approximately 2,000 employees.
Tonographv - The sites has generally less than 20$ slopes.
Flood hazard - The site is outside the Federal floodplain
designation.
Resource Protection - No conflicts with resource protection
guidelines noted.
Water supply - Water improvements to the site will be included
within Utility Capital Improvement Plan for 1991-92.
Sewer service - At site with 8" service.
Access - Road improvements are needed to Carvins Cove Dam Road and
I-81 at the Exit 43 off ramp. Economic Development staff proposes
to include improvements within the 1995-96 time frame in the VDOT
Secondary Road Plan. Access to the site should be accomplished by
owners at time of development.
Transportation - Access to I-81 at Exit 43.
Urban Sector - Property is within Urban Service Area.
A ~
` /,~j'+~ J `.Nt•t• ••
•
.y~.~~ \ \;:~yt~:7 :1 ~•~J;K
FALTER i;,~~; ,,.-7: 5.~s;•l,
~S'•
~
r
'+
~ :..
• ;
~~:. >
~ w+
.
7
PLANT :,~f
• ~4.
.la ~'C'•" ~f'~t'•
r. - ~K
Il «.................__~ _ .. - ~~..«.....
.~3 `_ •
f
to ,
'
~~
S`
i G-E
uRU ...;.. •. •. • ~
~ E
_ Site name: Hollins College
_ Sine: 163 acres
Zoning:
Comprehensive
Plan Designation:
Access:
Water:
Sewer:
M1
Development
Carvins Cove Dam Road
off site
on site
Availability: Hollins College Corporation controls the property.
Site development costs for grading and site
preparation have limited ready to go status of the
land.
Recommendation: Amend Comprehensive Plan to correspond with
zoning. Botetourt County~s Comprehensive Plan
shows the property to be industrial that is in .
Botetourt County. Prepare an agreement with
Botetourt County and Hollins College to allow
for future development. Water storage and
transmission to be developed. Carvins Cove Dam
Road should be placed in the VDOT Six Year
Secondary Road Plan.
Fiscal Impact:
1991 for water f 1995-96 for road improvements.
_~
„.
ROANOKE COUNTY REZONING APPLICATION
uate xec.:
Received By:
Case No.:
Ord. No.:
`'a' '~Q
1. Owner's Name : ~~ Phone : 3~~1-'/C~~3
Address : P• a ~ 8~1~ , ~~ ~- 2 ~o ~ y
2 . Applicant's Name: ~6G ~ /~uz~p'/~~~(~/t1 Phone:
Address:
3. Location of Property: ~_ / ~((~y~ D ~ cN..~ ~,~'~,Q~ Q,~~„
Tax Map Number (s) : ~~ ~{, 0 Z ' 2 - S(/p~-, ~,ti,.,,( 5-p ~ ~~
4. Magisterial District: ~jGt.
5. Size of Property: g G~21' o"t e ~
6. Existing Zoning: ~~ m ~/ '
Existing Land Use: (~ aG!l.~t/-,t~"
___-.
7 . Proposed Zoning: .~ N ~~STX'~/} t- (~ i8Tl2 t~T /)'1- /
Proposed Land Use: ,Z'y~l DUS'~9L ~e (~,2~v~zh'v~"
8. Comprehensive Plan Designation: ~rir-~, ~Y~y~J`Ll,Gc.~
9. Are Conditions Proffered With This Request? Yes / No
(If you are voluntarily offering proffers as a part of your applica-
tion, these proffers must be in rz-iting. A member of the Planning
Staff can assist you in the preparation of these proffers.)
10. Value of Land and (Proposed) Buildings:
11. The Following Items Must Be Submitted With This Application. Please
Check If Enclosed. Application Will Not Be Accepted If Any Of These
Items Are 1Kissinq Or Incomplete:
Letter of Application Concept Plan
Metes and Bounds Description List of Adjacent Owners
of Property (Attach Exhibit A) Vicinity Map
Application Fee Written Proffers
Water and Sewer Application (If Applicable)
12. Signature Of Property Owner, Contract Purchaser,
Or Owner's Agent:
Signature • 1/1~ Date ZS` ~
,~?~~~
~ ~ ROAN+,1.~ ~ ~,f - ~ . , ^; ,
Z ~u~
~ ~~~.~
a SEP 2fi x969
18 8$ DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
u~
8p ICENTEN P _ ''~ i~e 13~
ABeautifuJBeginning y~;x,, „,,, . _„
M E M O RAND U M ~ ~I'~~~tfe~r CV~'~~~
TO: Terry Harrington, Director, Planning and Zoning
FROM: Timothy W. Gubala, Director, Economic Development
DATE: September 25, 1989
SIIBJECT: Rezoning application - Salem West Corporation
On behalf of the Board of Supervisors, I am filing an application
of rezoning to Industrial District M-1 for approximately 125 acres
of land owned by Salem West Corporation in the Glenvar area of
Roanoke County. Although the land is designated as Principal
Industrial in the Comprehensive Plan, only a portion of it is
actually zoned Industrial M-2. The remainder is zoned A1MH. The
property owners will seek to market this property for industrial
development purposes upon achieving a successful rezoning.
Public utilities serving the site include water in Route 11/460.
Sewer service is off site to the east in the Roanoke River
Interceptor at Garman Road behind Kroger. The utility director
expects to extend public sewer to this site by the mid 1990's.
An existing access road extending to Route 11/460 will have to be
upgraded to accommodate future industrial traffic.
Proffered conditions offered for this rezoning include:
Limitations on permitted uses in M-1 to include:
a. Automobile painting, upholstering, repairing, rebuilding,
reconditioning, body and fender work, truck repairing or
overhauling;
b. Manufacture of pottery and figurines or other similar
ceramic products;
c• Veterinary hospital and commercial kennels with exterior
runs and yards;
d. Flea markets, unless a special exception has been granted
by the Board of Supervisors.
e. Seed and feed stores.
Please contact me should you have any questions.
P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE , VIRGINIA 24018-0798 (703) 772-2069
FAX. NO.: <703) 772-2030
M~]
Pb
~~
f
I
Z
;1 0
=A
AO
1
~~
O
o*
Z
A
C
tin ' 4°~
e •~ ~ti .
OQ 4~
~i Gr j~
~+
`p41i r
io
~~
rY :~
~ ..
~ `±~'e.
+~ e, 'ti\
r~ 40r
~- w'
.~ ."
ii ti>.
~t .
a^ ~t\s~.
~ 8 r= ~
;~ ~
~f ~
P1~~
rR
J^~
f
P
.r
~~;
of
o>
A
M
r ~
M ~,
I!
i / y
i
/ ~~ .
~ ~I
1 ' '
~ A ~r M`~A J ~.
~~ V 1
Q y e~ ~v
~ ~ .,,~ d
,~.~
Ai ~+
i~+~ ' X
w~~ ~ ~ ~e
.. ~~ r X _ •
r~l
ppy
Op
~r o,•
.~ wj~n
AJ
Y
t ' ~~ Ga.
~~ d )- t 11~
.~ ,' ; .0
0
i' Y '~ N'
i ~ '~
A ~ ~
~,~~
' / i O
e rs~
\
r
p
r
p
' \
1 `
~
hp~
`
~ a
~
A ~
N ~\ 1
L
O*C
4ti
o
~
~
\~
s'~4
h
1~
O {17
R
n
v
t,~
,~ o~
y
~ •a
~o'~.o
~~
Y ~
Y
ti
~,P ` \
O,ti 4
Oy~t~~l °~.~0
e °~ ,~ 4, ~
~O9 ~'. t'c o
^ri4~C,~0
'til J
~~>. r°aQas t
~'+~_
v~~ A
r ~Y W ~
~0~~ •
i
~ t
F~
~ a
NA
~0 OZO
O NnN
. "~ p A
~i
4
A
~w
A
0
i~ i
o
O
J
,4'i
f
~
~•
t'
r ro\
~,.o
<,! O
W
/,R
~
~
/~
O i~ W
~r
~
~ ~~ rp ~
~w ~~
~ (?1
.~y~1~~ t ~ t~ ~ ~
~. Y]6•SY ~L1'1 A
_ w~c• ~
c~
F~
E
tQ 4
~O
?F?>.
~~
4
Vj
c
~ ~e~i
Jr ;'h
.o .~-
.'~~ o~
,r ~~ v
Qr
~ o
:NQL
I
~' ~1
Z N L Z
a p _ n t+
O ~ ~P nu ~'
gn v. ur !-o
.J r 0 .i -~ C -~
or Ow o oW
'D U D _'
A P N j
c c~ ~ ti~*
0
i «
m- a
t
~ a? F
~ ~
•
~V
AKX1 ~ ~~ ~ i
8D Nr0
O+x~(
[X/t
Npw~
~RS
AR ~ K
i1
~,t
i
•~ao
.:~.•
i;{v,~{
:•{;~'
Y.: ll•/:1 ~:
{~`
r
f
Gl
fORE .
:;..::•
~`~
,;
`
~
v
r j{ 'h
.jr
~rM1~.
•rh1•'yy
'
'~``~::`''"'''~ i
~
TESTERMAN c
:' i
AN6 ~ •
IINDSEY ~~. • ABUN
Site name: Salem West
Size: 165 acres
Zoninq: M2, M1, MH
Comprehensive
Plan Designation: Principal Industrial
Access: Route 11/460
Water: Off site
Sewer: Off site
Availability: Property is available for sale.
Recommendation: Rezone remainder of site to M1
Extend sewer service to site.
Fiscal Impact: 1994 for sewer improvements
~~a~~ S
ROANORE COUNTY -~~.~(~~~ % ~ ~ 5
'FUSE NOT PROVIDED FOR" "PERM .:~'APPLI ~ h~ ~''
ti
~~ ~~- (h a -421-9647 '~
~,~' ~,R~~~:~o) ~ -996-7434 ~
1. Applicant s Name: GREGORY G. PIERCE v-- C ~, ~~;~ ,,,~ ph .
Address : 1850 Hidden Glen Drive ~ /~ ~:~~T/~~y ~
Marietta, GA ~l~ Q ~ 4'p: 30067
2. Location of Property: 1 mile east of Montgomery Co. line, 500 feet north
of Route 637 S~ 631 Intersection, west side Rt 631
3 . New Tax Map # : 110 - 1 - 3 Old Tax Map # : 55 - 3
4. Magisterial District Location: idindsor Hills District
5. Size of Property: 72.22
acres/sq. ft.
Size of Proposed Use Not Provided For: 72.22 acres/sq. ft.
6. Existing Land Use: FORESTRY/1 RESIDENCE/RECREATION
Existing Zoning: A - 1
7. Proposed Land Use: Training /Educational center
8. Comprehensive Plan Designation: Rural Preserve
9. Are Conditions being Proffered? Yes g No
10. Proposed Annual Gross Revenue: $1,837,500.00 (75~ occupancy)
11. Value of Land: 110,000.00 Value of (Proposed) Buildings: $950,000.00
12. Value of Machinery & Tools: $100.000. Number to be Employed: lg
13. Check Completed Items: Consultation
Letter of Application
8~" x 11" Concept Plan
Legal Forms
Application Fee
14. Applicant's Signature:
List of Adjacent Properties
Public Hearing Notices Issued
~~~
15. Owner's Consent, if different than applic nt:
Name: 4.,`11i~,,,, ~r ~~',4. Si nature:
g 2/ ~/
--------------------------------------------------
OFFICE USE ONLY: ~
Application Deadline: Hearing Date:
Received By:
Date Received:
Board of Supervisors
Hearing Date: Action:
~~,~ ...~ i~/ice
G--7
August 29, 1989 ~~~
Terrance 1. Harrington, RICP, Director of Planning
Count of Roanoke, Department of Planning and Zoning SEP b
y
Post Office BoK 29888 - 1~ .~N~44~~b~
Roanoke, Virginia 24818 8798 1 __;,~, f~'
RE: Proposed Training/Education Center on Route 631 (off Rt. 637)
Dear Mr. Harrington,
This letter and the attarhed proposal reflect our telephone
conuersatian of August 24th. Rs you remember, I inquired about the
procedure and deadlines fora "Use Not Provided for Permit" application,
as well as the passibility that my project might qualify under a permitted
use. I very much appreciate your offer to consult with the County's
attorney for an interpretation of the codes so you can answer my
question:
Does the nonprofit, Training/Education center I propose qualify as a
"following or similar use" under "(3) Public and nonprofit organization
uses such as schools, churches, libraries, game preserves, playgrounds and
parks;" as stated an page 13 of the county zoning regulations?
Rn affirmative response to this question would certainty simplify
the process of making my proposal become a reality; however, if you do
not feel that the center qualifies under a permitted use I am willing to
comply with the "Use Not Provided For" process. If you would tike
clarification or have questions about this project please feel free to
contact me at work (484)996-7434 or at home (484)421-9647; or to
contact my Real Estate Agent, Ron Testerman, in Roanoke at 982-2444 or
345-2328. Again, thank you for your consideration.
Sincerel
P
Greg Pierce
1858 Hidden Glen Drive
Marietta, Georgia 38867
THE
ERRTH
~a
Philosaphy_ In simpler times, THE HEARTH was the place of fire, where
family members gathered for food and warmth. It was the place where
stories were told end errperiences were shared; where family members
came far education, companionship, and love.
Genera[ Description: The Hearth is not an institution, a treatment center,
or a church. It is, instead, a nonprofit training and education center. Its
Workshops, Retreats and Individualized Programs are designed to provide
a setting, structure, end process which fosters personal growth. We are
able to serve a variety of guests, including:
1. Groups and organizations who have the need for
small specialized workshops and retreats;
2. Business Professionals who wish to improve their
leadership, communications, and management skills;
3. Health Professionals who work in the Treatment Industries;
4. Recovering Alcoholics, Addicts, Overeaters, Gamblers, etc.
who are active in the fellowships of AA, NA, OA, 6A, etc.;
5. Recovering ca-dependents and those from dysfunctional
families;
6. Couples who wish to improve their relationship;
7. Individuals who ere seeking spiritual or personal growth
and who need guidance.
Facilities: I propose to locate The Hearth on 7@ wooded acres south-west
of Roanoke, Virginia. Its focal point will be a i 4,@8@ square foat tog
building designed to eccammodate up to 48 guests for workshops and
retreats. This center wilt contain guest roams, a kitchen, dining room,
offices, a library, a lecture hail, classrooms, and some recreation
facilities. Separate from this main building sarill be sits tog cabins each
housing up to 1 @ guests who are following Individualized Programs and
who utilize the facilities of The Hearth, but do not participate in the
workshops and retreats. The maximum capacity of The Hearth will be t @8
guests and we hope to operate ate 5@-7@~ occupancy rate. In addition
there wilt be a number of small outbuildings including a schoolhouse,
barn, chapel, garage, maintenance shop, and such. These facilities are
designed to give guests a feeling of sanctuary and serenity. Traffic in and
Ps~nP 1
THE
r
EARTH
out of the center wilt be strongly discouraged; a shuttle service for guests
wilt be provided from public transportation sites in Roanoke; those who
drive their own vehicles wilt be asked to park them by the entrance to
the property. The recreational use of alcohol and other drugs wilt never
be permitted at The Nearth. Each guest has a right to enjoy the beauty and
tranquility of the setting without interference from others.
The library: One of the key elements of The Hearth will be the library. We
plan to establish an extensive collection of educational materials and
archives. It wilt consist of books, pamphlets, periodicals, video tapes,
audio tapes, pictures, and artifacts. The emphasis wilt be on spirituality,
philosophy, self-help, mental health, inspirations! pieces, and reference
materials to be used in our workshops and retreats. Our Individualized
Programs wilt depend heavily on utilization of these resources.
Staff: The Hearth staff wilt live "on site" in the center and in 4 additional
tog cabins. The staff wilt be responsible for at! aspects of Nearth
operations as welt as partners in our philosophy and goats. Our plans are
to open the center with a staff 'of 6-8 key people; however, this number is
expected to grow rapidly to 18-12, which should be sufficient to serve the
anticipated number of guests. A consistent 98-188% occupancy rate would
require a staff of approximately 1 S in order to maintain the desired level
of service.
Workshops: The primary component of The Hearth program is the Fiue Day
Workshop. The focus of these workshops varies each week to meet the
needs of a specific group of guests and they are planned approtrimatety 3
months in advance. The list of possible workshop topics is limited only by
imagination and the wishes of our guests. One week we may be
presenting a workshop on "Parenting Skitts"; the neat week on
"Understanding the Disease of Chemical Dependence"; and then
"Innovative Marketing", "Understanding family Systems", "Avoiding
Burnout", "Drug Abuse Awareness for Teachers", or some other topic.
Workshops are facilitated by The Hearth staff or outside specialists who
have been selected for their knowledge end presents#ion skills.
Ps~na '~
THE
Y
ERRTH
.. ~
Retreats: R second major part of The Hearth is the Weekend Retreat.
These retreats wilt nary in focus between helping guests improve their
relationship with the God of their understanding and learning about a
specific spiritual principle or concept such as reciprocity, integrity,
honesty, humility, or service. Weekend Retreats are less structured than
the Five Day Workshops. They ask each guest to complete an assignment
and do research independently or in small groups; and then to share what
they have learned or eNperienced with the other guests.
Individualized Programs: These are designed to accommodate those who
wish to invest a tonger period of time, such as their vacation, on personal
growth or spiritual development. Individuals, couples, or small groups
may came to The Hearth to utilize the facilities and participate in certain
parts of the struc#ured program. This is equivalent to an independent
study course, where the curriculum is established according to the needs
of the individual. Guests may stay on a week-to-week basis for as tong as
they wish.
Costs: The goal of The Hearth is to provide a valuable learning and growth
experience at a cost that is affordable to most individuals, and
comparable with what one would e~rpect to spend on their vacation. Our
fees include room, board, and all supplies needed for participation. The
average projected charges for workshops and retreats are S 188 per day
and individualized Programs are S58 per day. There are additional fees for
child care, special housing arrangements, and merchandized items.
Paoe 3
~~x
'..~ `°
September 72, 1989
Gregory G. Pierce
1650 gild an Glen naive
Marietta, GA 38067
X484)421-9647
PRO~'ERRED CONDITiONS For IISE NOT PROVIDED FOR PERMIT APPLICATION
For' Proposed ~rafning ~ Education Center Ca3.Ied THE AEARTA And
Located One Mile East Of Montg ornery Co. Line, 500 Feet North Of
Rout• 637 And 631 Intersection, west Side Route 631:
1. No new buildings will be constructed within Z00 feet of
the property lines.
Z. Hooded areas will be maintained in a natural condition
except far building sites, drainfields, roads, and
walking paths.
3. Maximum Capacity of the gueBt facilities will be 100
pergans.
4. Maximum re~3idential Staff will be 18 persons.
Applicant's signature:
Gregory G. Pierce
~~`~`
~.
PROPOSED CENTER
G-7
,....
~Ft~wl ~ D2 ~ 8R ~-°t:, 8R
is 82 B j C'vN r. ~ TM'E I~~ v~apca7 g,Z ~
KtTtltEly - <j [_ R ~
............... ............. 8 '
\_ ........ I STO RAF CR ~
I~I~' - ( Di~rii~l(r R~onn u>3;zv~.y 1
,.,' ............................i $ 4 LR S+PPLtES 1 LIZ ' D
VTiI, '3V~r, nPFCJ}t oaaice ecF+cF,, ; RRCMq/E
.. eR n a rL 1 a z. a ~_~ .: ~ - 5 81z I e Iz
rips r ri_oon r~nN
8~ 02. 02
~ ~ 8 (Z ~- 8(L 8tt 6~ B~ 8~ 61Z 8R 9~
- 3 ~~ 1
~~ s -- s -
.,
(°P~~l S 1 TT1 til4- ~
H LR % ~_ r
13 , e2 l ~ QfL ~ 82 ~
a~ - _ 6~ aR j at:_ -- I R I e~ ~2 1-82
seco~in r•~oon P~_nal
A7TAGirnEt~T "A"
G-'1
.~
N
_z
c~
LL1
cn
O
a.
U..
_I -~
u
u.
H
a
a
a
0
0
a
:~
F
~ li
_~ ~ ~ ~ I i
v ~ I ~ ~I
~ - ~ fll
N
w
U'
y
~r
.1
z
.~
a
0
0
~ Y ~ I
c~ - s~ ~ u.
~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ Q
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N
5 ~
_ 7
- - a ~ /~
J
J
I ,~-'
__ ~
0
~ ~ ~ 1 .;
o I ~~ _ ~~~
~ ~~
.~I ~ ~ ~ ~
~ i i •. C
~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ c
AT`rACHnt~ N~ "B'•
FRANK DAVIS
SOILS CONSULTANT
ROUTE 1, BOX 214A
ROCKY MOUNT, VA. 24151
p03) 483-4914
September 6, 1989
Mr. Greg Pierce
X1850 Hidden Glen Drive
Marietta, Ga. 30067
r-~~
Re: 70 acre tract fronting Route 631 near the intersection of
Route 637 in Roanoke County.
Dear Greg:
I have conducted preliminary soil studies along two ridges of the
above noted tract of land and found the soil to be generally
suitable for the installation of subsurface drainfields. These
studies indicate that there is sufficient area of suitable soil
for drainfields to serve the main body of your proposed Training
and Education Center as discussed with Ron Testerman.
Please call me if you have any questions or if I can be of
further assistance.
Sincerel ,
p..ti;..
Fra~n~ avis
N- i
1
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY,
VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER,
TUESDAY, OCTOBER 24, 1989
ORDINANCE 102489-3 AMENDING SECTIONS 10-4 AND
10-15 AND ADDING SECTION 10-19 OF CHAPTER 10,
LICENSES, OF THE ROANORE COUNTY CODE
WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on
October 10, 1989; and the second reading and public hearing was
held on October 24, 1989.
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia, as follows:
1. Chapter 10, Licenses, of the Roanoke County Code is
hereby amended as follows:
Sec. 10-4. Application for license; duties of commissioner;
•~ -~= penalties for operating business without
a license, failing to file an application, or filing
false statements.
a) All persons embraced by this chapter, unless otherwise
specifically provided, shall make application for licenses to the
commissioner of the revenue by January 31 of each year. The
commissioner of the revenue shall furnish the necessary forms,
which shall be properly filled in with such information as the
commissioner may require. Every applicant for a license to conduct
any business, profession, trade, or occupation under the provisions
of this chapter shall furnish the commissioner of the revenue in
writing with his correct name and trade name; his correct residence
address; the nature of the business, profession, trade, or
occupation to be pursued; the place where it is to be pursued; and
a record of gross receipts verified by oath for the preceding
twelve (12) months; as well as such other information as may be
required by the commissioner of the revenue. The commissioner
shall compute the amount of license tax and after payment shall
issue the license, subject to zoning certification as provided in
section 10-7.
b) It shall be unlawful and a violation of this chapter for
any person to operate a business, profession, trade, or occupation
within the county without having first obtained a license in
accordance with this section and before posting such license as
required by section 10-13. Such violations shall constitute a
class 1 misdemeanor.
2
c) It shall be unlawful and a violation of this chapter for
any person to make false statements with intent to defraud in any
application, return, or affidavit required by this chapter. Such
violation shall constitute (i) a class 3 misdemeanor if the amount
of the tax lawfully assessed in connection with the return is
$1,000 or less, or (ii) a class 1 misdemeanor if the amount of the
tax lawfully assessed in connection with the return in more than
$1,000. Upon conviction under this section, the commissioner of
the revenue shall revoke all licenses of the business for the
balance of the tax year.
d) Any person, firm or corporation holding a license under
this cha ter to o erate an business shall forfeit such license
immediately upon conviction by any court of competent jurisdiction
in the Commonwealth of Virginia of a violation of (i) section 18 2
248 relating to an imitation controlled substance or (ii) section
18.2-248.7 relating to money laundering
e) No license issued pursuant to this chapter shall be valid
or effective unless and until the tax required shall be paid to the
county treasurer and such payment shall be shown on the license.
f) The commissioner of the revenue shall report monthly to
the treasurer the aggregate amount of license taxes assessed during
the month and placed in the hands of the treasurer for collection.
State law reference - Code of Virginia Section 58.1-3916.1, 18.2-
248.6.
Sec. 10-15. Certification of erroneous assessment; refunds when
licensee ceases to do business.
a) The commissioner of the revenue is empowered to certify
to the treasurer any instances of erroneous assessments. Upon
receipt of such certificate the treasurer is directed to make a
refund based upon the certificate of the commissioner of the
revenue.
b) Licenses issued under the provisions of article II of
this chapter, except those measured by other than gross receipts
or gross expenditures, shall be subject to refund where the
licensee goes out of business before the end of the current license
year subject to all of the following qualifications:
1) License for the current license year must be based
on gross receipts or gross expenditures obtained
throughout the preceding calendar year.
2) The reason for going-out-of-business is not
connected in any manner with the violation of any
state law or local ordinance or violation of any
3
rules or regulations made pursuant thereto.
3) The amount of refund shall be determined in the
following manner: If the licensee goes out of
business before the end of an month exce t
December the refund shall be calculated by dividin
the tax aid for that ear's license b a fraction
in which the numerator shall be the number of months
remainin in the calendar ear followin the month
in which business ceases and the denominator is the
number twelve (12); but in no case shall the rethis
reduce the tax below the minimum as provided by
code.
0
~ t r Ti l , ~
~~ T _ _ 1 yj y' 1 t ~bA
~ ~
0 '
4) No refunoth ralflat license fee n t bas daontgross
of any
receipts.
c) Refunds based on licensee going out of business shall be
made in the same manner as herein provided for erroneous
assessments.
d) If any person seeking a refund is indebted to the county
or any department or office thereof, or is indebted t thenrefunde
constitutional office of the county shall f rst be applied to such
or so much thereof as is necessary,
indebtedness.
e) pny person who has been properly issued a license may
apply for a refund prior ovidin dats tisfact ry tevidence5etoasthe
become effective by pr g
Commissioner of the Reven ance a or exh bition will not take placed
or the sale, show, perform ,
Upon being satisfied th ri e ma authorizeaa refund f the license
Commissioner of the Reve y rocessing fee.
fee less a thirty dollar ($30) p
State Law Reference - Code of Virginia Section 58.1-3980, 3981.
4
2. That Chapter 10, "Licenses," of the Roanoke County Code
be, and hereby is, amended and reenacted by the addition of the
following section to read and provide as follows:
Sec. 10-18. Penalties.
Any person who shall willfully fail or refuse to file a
business license tax return as required by Section 10-4 shall be
guilty of a violation of law Upon conviction for such failure
the person shall be punished as a Class 3 misdemeanor if the amount
of the tax lawfully assessed in connection with the return is
$1.000 or less and as a Class 1 misdemeanor if the amount of the
tax lawfully assessed in connection with the return is more than
1 000.
State Law Reference--Code of Virginia, Section 58.1-3916.1 and
Section 58.1-3700.
3. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect on
and after November 1, 1989.
On motion of Supervisor Robers, seconded by Supervisor
Nickens, and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisor Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTE:
maw-, ..~. ~ ~'-~-L~~
Mary H. Allen, Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: File
R. Wayne Compton, Commissioner of Revenue
Alfred C. Anderson, Treasurer
Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney
Skip Burkart, Commonwealth Attorney
Magistrate
Sheriff's Department
Roanoke Law Library, 315 Church Avenue, S.W., Rke, 24016
Main Library
Roanoke County Code Book
Roanoke County J&D Court, Intake Counsellor
ACTION #
ITEM NUMBER /'~ -
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
IN ROANOKE, VA., ON TUESDAY, OCTOBER 10, 1989
MEETING DATE: October 24, 1989
AGENDA ITEM: ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTIONS 10-4 AND 10-15 AND
ADDING SECTION 10-19 OF CHAPTER 10, LICENSES , OF
THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
BACKGROUND'
During the extensive revision of the current Business License
Ordinance adopted on November 22, 1988, no explicit provision was
included establishing criminal liability for failure to apply for
a business license or file a business license tax return. Over the
past nine months, several instances have come to light of
businesses, especially those selling their goods from vehicles,
which are operating in this county without the benefit of a
business license or return.
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
Section 58.1-3700
business, employment,
license where the law
levied a license tax c
Section 58.1-3916.1 att
or refusal to file a ~
for making fraudulent
A recent amendment gra
the lawful tax asses
criminal code, Section
license shall be forfE
is convicted either
makes it a violation of law to carry on any
or profession without first obtaining a
requires a license and the legislature has
n such business, employment or profession.
aches criminal penalties for willful failure
equired business license return as well as
statements in connection with such return.
iuates the penalty based upon the amount of
ament. A recent addition to Virginia's
18.2-248.6, now provides that a business
ited where the entity holding such license
of the sale of an imitation cnntrn11Pr3
substance under Section 18.2-248 or of laundering of drug related
proceeds under Section 18.2-248.7. A problem which has arisen with
regard to refunds of business license taxes has been addressed by
a change to a quarterly as opposed to a monthly basis for
calculating refunds. However the minimum license tax provided for
by any section of this ordinance would not be refunded.
/~-I
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of these amendments in order to
close a significant loophole in the county's business license
ordinance.
Respectfully submitted
~. ti
J se B. Obenshain, Esq.
enior Asst. County Attorney
Action
Approved ( )
Denied ( )
Received ( )
Referred
to
Motion by
Garrett
Johnson
McGraw
Nickens
Robers
Vote
No Yes Abs
It
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY,
VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER,
TUESDAY, OCTOBER 24, 1989
ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTIONS 10-4 AND 10-15 AND
ADDING SECTION 10-19 OF CHAPTER 10, LICENSES,
OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE
WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on
October 10, 1989; and the second reading and public hearing was
held on October 24, 1989.
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia, as follows:
1. Chapter 10, Licenses, of the Roanoke County Code is
hereby amended as follows:
Sec. 10-4. Application for license; duties of commissioner;
u==~~~~ enalties for operating business without
a license failin to file an a lication or filin
false statements.
a) All persons embraced by this chapter, unless otherwise
specifically provided, shall make application for licenses to the
commissioner of the revenue by January 31 of each year. The
commissioner of the revenue shall furnish the necessary forms,
which shall be properly filled in with such information as the
commissioner may require. Every applicant for a license to conduct
any business, profession, trade, or occupation under the provisions
of this chapter shall furnish the commissioner of the revenue in
writing with his correct name and trade name; his correct residence
address; the nature of the business, profession, trade, or
occupation to be pursued; the place where it is to be pursued; and
a record of gross receipts verified by oath for the preceding
twelve (12) months; as well as such other information as may be
required by the commissioner of the revenue. The commissioner
shall compute the amount of license tax and after payment shall
issue the license, subject to zoning certification as provided in
section 10-7.
b) It shall be unlawful and a violation of this cha ter for
anv person to operate a business profession trade or occupation
within the count without haven first obtained a license in
accordance with this section and before ostin such license as
required by section 10-13 Such violations shall constitute a
class 1 misdemeanor.
N-/
2
c) It shall be unlawful and a violation of this chapter for
any person to make false statements with intent to defraud in any
application, return, or affidavit required by this chapter. Such
violation shall constitute (i) a class 3 misdemeanor if the amount
of the tax lawfully assessed in connection with the return is
$1,000 or less, or (ii) a class 1 misdemeanor if the amount of the
tax lawfully assessed in connection with the return in more than
$1,000. Upon conviction under this section, the commissioner of
the revenue shall revoke all licenses of the business for the
balance of the tax year.
d) Any person firm, or corporation holding a license under
this chapter to operate any business shall forfeit such license
immediately upon conviction by any court of competent jurisdiction
in the Commonwealth of Virginia of a violation of (i) section 18.2-
248 relating to an imitation controlled substance or (ii) section
18 2-248.7 relating to money laundering.
e) No license issued pursuant to this chapter shall be valid
or effective unless and until the tax required shall be paid to the
county treasurer and such payment shall be shown on the license.
f) The commissioner of the revenue shall report monthly to
the treasurer the aggregate amount of license taxes assessed during
the month and placed in the hands of the treasurer for collection.
State law reference - Code of Virginia Section 58.1-3916.1, 18.2-
248.6.
Sec. 10-15. Certification of erroneous assessment; refunds when
licensee ceases to do business.
a) The commissioner of the revenue is empowered to certify
to the treasurer any instances of erroneous assessments. Upon
receipt of such certificate the treasurer is directed to make a
refund based upon the certificate of the commissioner of the
revenue.
b) Licenses issued under the provisions of article II of
this chapter, except those measured by other than gross receipts
or gross expenditures, shall be subject to refund where the
licensee goes out of business before the end of the current license
year subject to all of the following qualifications:
1) License for the current license year must be based
on gross receipts or gross expenditures obtained
throughout the preceding calendar year.
2) The reason for going-out-of-business is not
connected in any manner with the violation of any
state law or local ordinance or violation of any
~-!
rules or regulations made pursuant thereto.
3) The amount of refund shall be determined in the
following manner: If the licensee goes out of
business before the end of any month except
December the refund shall be calculated by dividing
the tax paid for that year's license by a fraction
in which the numerator shall be the number of months
remaining in the calendar year following the month
in which business ceases and the denominator is the
number twelve (12); but in no case shall the refund
reduce the tax below the minimum as provided by this
code.
3
~ ~ f ~ 'a~ *
tat
r a ~ l
t h F?
~iP
3 9
3-~
'~ ~
b ~^
_
_
~~
° _
L~€tr~ ~s
~ - e-s e~
°
~ r ~
~~ i ~~
--
-
~
~
~ t s e
~... ~. s
e
,
~ ~, -
~-~ =~
d-
' e~
a
~~b
i-e
e-
° -
--op e ~
ey s
e
~ = ~
a t
~ ~-1
t s-
i
i~-s- c
an rc uvc-
-
i~ 9 a
~i vv~
t
* * ~k ~k
4) No refund shall be made of any minimum flat tax or
of any other flat license fee not based on gross
receipts.
c) Refunds based on licensee going out of business shall be
made in the same manner as herein provided for erroneous
assessments.
d) If any person seeking a refund is indebted to the county
or any department or office thereof, or is indebted to any state
constitutional office of the county for a local levy, the refund,
or so much thereof as is necessary, shall first be applied to such
indebtedness.
e) Any person who has been properly issued a license may
apply for a refund prior to the date upon which the license was to
become effective by providing satisfactory evidence to the
Commissioner of the Revenue that the business was never commenced
or the sale, show, performance, or exhibition will not take place.
Upon being satisfied that such license was never in effect, the
Commissioner of the Revenue may authorize a refund of the license
fee less a thirty dollar ($30) processing fee.
State Law Reference - Code of Virginia Section 58.1-3980, 3981.
~~
4
2. That Chapter 10, "Licenses," of the Roanoke County Code
be, and hereby is, amended and reenacted by the addition of the
following section to read and provide as follows:
Sec. 10-18. Penalties.
Any person who shall willfully fail or refuse to file a
business license tax return as required by Section 10-4 shall be
ciuilty of a violation of law. Upon conviction for such failure,
the person shall be punished as a Class 3 misdemeanor if the amount
of the tax lawfully assessed in connection with the return is
~1 000 or less and as a Class 1 misdemeanor if the amount of the
tax lawfully assessed in connection with the return is more than
1 000.
State Law Reference--Code of Virginia, Section 58.1-3916.1 and
Section 58.1-3700.
3. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect on
and after November 1, 1989.
ACTION #
ITEM NUMBER~o~
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: October 24, 1989
AGENDA ITEM: Ordinance amending Chapter 8, "Erosion and
Sediment Control" of the Roanoke County Code by amending Section
8-11 (a), "Control Measures Generally", to provide for adoption
of Stormwater Management Criteria, and Resolution adopting a new
section of the Design and Construction Standards Manual entitled
"Stormwater Management Criteria".
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
BACKGROUND:
With the increased amount of flooding, in the past several
years, Stormwater Management and Drainage Control has become a
major issue.
The County is presently addressing these issues by:
1. Instituting a drainage program.
2. Recommending detention for rezonings, a 10 year run-off
storm post-development to a predeveloped 2 year
condition.
3. Improving enforcement provisions for Erosion and
Sediment Control.
4. The County has identified Stormwater Management as
a valleywide issue.
The proposed standards will require new development (site
and subdivision) to provide adequate detention/retention of
Stormwater to insure that new problems are not created with the
aggravation of old problems.
Further Amendments to the Erosion and Sediment Control
Ordinance, Subdivision Ordinance and the Design Construction
-~--a
Standards Manual will be necessary as valleywide stormwater
problems are addressed.
This roposed Amendment to the Erosion and Sediment Control
Ordinance provides for:
1. New development must provide on-site detention and
retention of stormwater.
2. Increase detention/retention requirements for new
developments.
3. Require additional site elevation and grading
information.
4. Require Maintenance Agreements of stormwater Management
Facilities, in lieu of policy.
This Amendment accomplishes the following:
1. On-site detention/retention of 10 and 50 year storms.
2. On-site grading to manage surface run-off to
appropriate and adequate drainage facility.
3. Require maintenance of detention facilities by
Ordinance.
4. To insure new developments do not create new problems
and aggravate old problems.
This Amendment does not address the following:
1. Does not correct existing downstream flooding.
2. Does not address flooding conditions greater than a 50
year flood storm.
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
Two separate actions by the Roanoke County Board of
Supervisors will 'ae required: Adoption of an Ordinance amending
the Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinance, and adoption of a
Resolution adding a new section to the Design and Construction
Standards Manual.
The first reading of the Ordinance was held on October 10,
1989; the Public Hearing and second reading is scheduled for
October 24, 1989. The remaining portions of the stormwater
Management Standards and Specifications will be presented at a
later date.
..
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the proposed Amendment to the Erosion
Sediment Control Ordinance, and the adoption of the Resolution
incorporating the Stormwater Management Criteria in the Design
and Construction Standards Manual, be approved.
The Amendments, Additions and Reactments shall be in full
force and affect, from and after October 25, 1989, and the
effective date of this Ordinance and the Stormwater Management
Criteria for the Design and Construction Standards Manual shall
apply to plans which have not been accepted for review by the
Department of Development and Inspections prior to October 25,
1989; provided said plans in the review process receive final
approval by the County within sixty (60) days of October 25,
1989.
BMITTED BY: APPROVED:
Arnold Covey Elmer C. Hodge
Director of Developm nt Review County Administrator
and Inspections
-----------------------------------------------
Approved ( )
Denied ( )
Received ( )
Referred
to
Motion by:
ACTION VOTE
No Yes Abs
Garrett
Johnson
McGraw
Nickens
Robers
~-~
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY,
VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER,
TUESDAY, OCTOBER 24, 1989
ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 8, "EROSION AND
SEDIMENT CONTROL" OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE
BY AMENDING SECTION 8-11(a), "CONTROL MEASURES
GENERALLY" TO PROVIDE FOR THE ADOPTION OF
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT CRITERIA
WHEREAS, the adoption of more stringent criteria to regulate
stormwater management is authorized by Section 10.1-562 of the Code
of Virginia, 1950, as amended; and
WHEREAS, notice of the County's intention to adopt an
amendment to its erosion and sediment control ordinance was duly
advertised in the Roanoke Times and World News on October 10, 1989,
and October 17, 1989; and
WHEREAS, the first reading on this ordinance was held on
October 10, 1989; the second reading and public hearing were held
on October 24, 1989.
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia, as follows:
1. That Chapter 8, "Erosion and Sediment Control" of the
Roanoke County Code be, and hereby is, amended and reenacted by
amending Section 8-11(a) to read and provide as follows:
Sec. 8-11. Control measures generally.
(a) Practices for erosion and sediment control in the county
shall meet or exceed the standards and specifications contained in
the Virginia Erosion and Sediment Control Handbook, Part III, a
published and amended through March 8, 1983, in haec verba and the
Code of Virginia, as amended, through such date, except for those
more stringent local stormwater management criteria which the Board
of Supervisors of Roanoke County Virginia may adopt by resolution
and incorporate into the manual of regulations and policies
entitled " Design and Construction Standards Manual "
2. That these amendments, additions, and reenactments shall
be in full force and effect from and after October 25, 1989, and
that the effective date for this ordinance and the stormwater
management criteria for the Design and Construction Standards
Manual shall apply to plans which have not been accepted for review
by the Department of Development and Inspections prior to
October 25, 1989; provided said plans in the review process receive
final approval by the County within sixty (60) days of October 25,
1989.
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY,
VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER,
TUESDAY, OCTOBER 24, 1989
RESOLUTION ADOPTING A NEW SECTION OF THE
DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS MANUAL
ENTITLED "STORMWATER MANAGEMENT CRITERIA"
WHEREAS, the Department of Development is in the process of
preparing a manual to assist the public, and especially the
development community, for clarification of rules, regulations, and
policies applicable to land development in Roanoke County; and
WHEREAS, a Design and Construction Standards Committee
composed of area engineers, surveyors, members of the Roanoke
Valley Homebuilders Association, and County staff was assembled to
develop the content of the manual and the design standards; and
WHEREAS, it was the consensus of the committee to address the
areas of water, sewer, street and parking, and stormwater
management in the manual; and
WHEREAS, at its meeting on February 14, 1989, the Board of
Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, by resolution, adopted a
manual of regulations and policies entitled "Design and
Construction Standards Manual" to assist the public in the
clarification and interpretation of rules, regulations, and
policies applicable to land development in Roanoke County, and in
particular, the areas of water, sewer, street and parking; and
WHEREAS, the water design standards, street and parking design
standards and specifications, and subdivision approval for on-site
sewage disposal and well systems standards chapters of the manual
have been previously completed and adopted.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved that the Board of Supervisors
~~
of Roanoke County, Virginia, does hereby adopt the fourth component
of the Design and Construction Standards Manual entitled
"Stormwater Management Criteria" which is attached hereto and
incorporated herein by reference.
Further, this section of the manual shall be in full force and
effect from and after October 25, 1989, and the stormwater
management criteria shall apply to plans which have not been
accepted for review by the Department of Development and Inspection
prior to October 25, 1989, provided said plans in the review
process receive final approval by the County within sixty (60) days
of October 25, 1989.
-i
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY,
VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER,
TUESDAY, OCTOBER 10, 1989
ORDINANCE 102489-5 ACCEPTING AN OFFER FOR AND
AUTHORIZING THE SALE OF 10 ACRES, MORE OR
LESS, IN THE GLENVAR WEST PORTION OF ROANORE
COUNTY (SHAMROCK FIELD)
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia, as follows:
1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.01 of the
Charter of Roanoke County, the subject property has been declared
to be surplus and is being made available for other public uses,
i.e. economic development; and
2. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the
Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading was held on September
26, 1989; and a second reading was held on October 24, 1989,
concerning the sale and disposition of 10 acres, more or less, in
the Glenvar West portion of Roanoke County (Shamrock field); and
3. That offers having been received for said property, the
offer of Atlantic and Pacific Inc. for Twenty-three Thousand
Dollars ($23,000) per acre to purchase 10 acres, more or less, for
Two Hundred Thirty Thousand Dollars ($230,000) is hereby accepted
and all other offers are rejected; and
4.
u; ~ ~ ^~-~'- - That all
i,. ~ ~ 8 ~z~~-~9---~iz~-QETo~e~-9~~tcz ~B-~-G~ L n .
proceeds from the sale of this real estate are to be placed in the
capital facility account; and
5. That the County Administrator is authorized to execute
such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County
as are necessary to accomplish the conveyance of said property, all
of which shall be upon form approved by the County Attorney.
On motion of Supervisor McGraw as amended in Paragrqaph #4,
seconded by Supervisor Robers, and carried by the following
recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisor Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTE:
~. L...~
Mary H. Allen, Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Paul Mahoney, County Attorney
Timothy W. Gubala, Director, Economic Development
John Willey, Director, Real Estate Assessment
Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance
Steve Carpenter, Director, Parks & Recreation
Item No . """`
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
IN ROANOKE, VA ON TUESDAY,
MEETING DATE: October 24, 1989
SUBJECT: Sale of 10 acres in the Glenvar West section of Roanoke
County (Shamrock field)
COUNTY ADMINISTRATORS COMMENTS: ~ '~ _p ~~o
~~ ,,Lam y ~,L /GO ~.~•e" vl
/`"
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
Since the first reading of the proposed sale, the staff has
continued to negotiate with the two prospective buyers. (Atlantic
and Pacific, Incorporated being one, and the second prospective
buyer wishing to remain anonymous.) During the negotiations, it
was suggested that the site could be jointly purchased and
developed by these two parties. While a joint purchase was ruled
out, an agreement to investigate sharing the site was supported by
the two prospects.
With this in mind, Atlantic and Pacific is prepared to purchase the
ten acres and initiate engineering studies for the purpose of
several companies locating at this site. (If and when the
anonymous company's corporate office decides that the Shamrock site
fits their needs, Atlantic and Pacific will offer any available
land with no mark-up in price.)
The Parks and Recreation Department supports the sale of this site
with the understanding that the proceeds will go towards the
development of Green Hill Park.
For this sale to be complete, a pending rezoning of a portion of
this tract from B-2 to M-1 has been filed with the Planning
Commission.
BACKGROUND:
Atlantic and Pacific is a Roanoke based company that provides
engineering and installation services to operating telephone
companies and manufacturers of switching equipment. Since 1981
they have been actively engaged in the installation of fiber
optical and digital transmission equipment in the eastern United
States. Presently, Atlantic and Pacific requires highly skilled
employees and plans to double their current employment level of 50
within three years. If it is feasible for both companies to locate
on this site, employment will begin at approximately 85 and
increase to nearly 160 in three years.
~~ o
FISCAL IMPACT:
The sale of this property amounts to $230,000 or $23,000 per acre.
Total tax revenue from Atlantic and Pacific will reach $13,500
annually. This sale not only creates jobs and generates tax
revenue, it will enable Green Hill Park to be partially developed
without taking revenues away from other areas.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
1. Approve sale of ten acres to Atlantic and Pacific,
Incorporated, for $23,000 per acre for a total of $230,000.
2. Authorize County Administrator to execute all necessary
documents upon review of the County Attorney.
SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED:
~~~~ ~-
Timo by W. Gubala, Director Elmer C. Hodge, Jr.,
Economic Development County Administrator
---------------------------------------------------------------
ACTION No Yes Abs
Approved ( ) Motion by: Garrett
Denied ( )
Received ( )
Referred
to
Johnson
McGraw
Nickens
Robers
Attachment
~ab
A
0
Q
3
8~ ~ a°~N~
M STAB ~ y~9'OZ
w, /R
N 55
~~
'
"
E
S5
: S yy'Y8
' 'C1 68.73'
S 36'57%2"E
'
'
• ` 76.82
Me V/TTY NOME9 OF
AldfNOKC VALLEY, INC.
S 28'3`1'/9" E o.e: /099 Pc. a4
/O/ 68' TAX PARCEL. SS.09-/-~1
TAX PARCEL. 55.09-/-20
8. /3y ACRES
10
3 ''
0
ti
a
J
O
0
W
j
O
LEGEND
ti
a
/O. 'I9B
~ (T07
S i' ~ ~~ 57.0/'
~ ~'~~ ~/~ ~~ ~S 2 76.50 G`E
i pA cENTERCINE
O O ~; ~%'~~~ AVER' EX/JT. SEWER •`
.0 a .:'~ ~1~R \ •~...5 y3'b3''/9" W 5/'/.75'
ti ~ ,,-%'~ ~; '~~~ s ./6~9''Y8" W 28.72.
N '~ ~ ~'~~ 8 67.03'56" W 28./x/'
2,%'~~ `-~ S 07'Y92~"E e•p`, J 50'/6'03" W 3~/.H/'.
23.12 j rne)
C>br~ S 73'29'03"E 88.28
~ ~
N
RcE%sy C ~ S 02"Y(o'ti/3" W
,Q qi ~'~ S 53 :r /00.60
ti ~~ ~ gee)
tom' p1(D•A' PORT/ON OF
~ EeM TAX PARCEL SS. /3-/-2 p~~-S 56'00'2V" W 8/.08
2.3<05~ AC/QE3 /
S 38'02 29" W
~ ~ 96.29' ROANOKE COUNTY e0AR0
~ OS/~y(o't/9",1/V OF JL/PERV/3083 (R.C.,B.S.)
~ L). Q . 34 PG. SY6
_~Lf~~~ $9.76' TAX PARCEL. 65./3-/-2
ti
hi
2
~ (~ /~ y~.y. 3 ~ Z ' • ~S 08' 551 ~SI T " E
By 70'
~/ 7/.07' dp~~_//9,y3'NOTES
! ;S 78./5 ~~" W 1.LEGAL REFERENCE: DEED BOOK 1247~PAGE 122e
~' -' 2.TAX MAP NUMBER: 55.09-1-20 AND POP,TION OF
s 09.56'/3" W 55.13-1-2
R.c.e.s. 36.97'
TAX PARCEL 3. PROPERTY NOT IN ANY HUD FLOOD HAZARD ZONE
55./3-/-2 S 7y'~/7 30" W ~~,Q-/~! r
///. 78
J~oW's Tyr S
GEr ~tF ~Civo cJ
SURVEYED PROPERTY LINE
• -•-SURVEYED TIE LINE
- - -DEED LINE
K FENCE
-_os~ •••^-CREEK/BRANCH
OVERHEAD UTILITIES
,ro" UTILITY POLE
O EXISTING IRON FOUND
® SAN.SEWER MANHOLE
PLAT OF SURVEY FOR
y "g~At,TB'OA ~ °~ ROANOKE COUNT Y
,~, ~ /r~ ~ ~OAR~ OF SUPER V/SOBS
I ~ +^~w SHOWING TAX PARCEL 55.09-1-20 AND
*c RU'•SCRT S. TANG ~~ A PORTION OF TAX PARCEL 55.13-1-2
~; f' SITUATE ALONG THE EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY
~ lp:~.160 VA. SECONDARY ROUTE 643 AND
;~ ~J(~, Q r ALONG THE F.ASTFRT.Y RTRNT-nF-wav nF
1
..~ , .
35'// "E
22'
02~05'/S/" W
S8. y0'
i 2y'2/'/7"E
/20. S/2 '
9-20-89 Steve McGraw: Park at G~eeneHi111Parke the funds from Shamrock
Elmer Hodge
S- l
ROANOKE COUNTY PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT -
GREEN HILL PARK DEVELOPMENT - PHASE II
I. EXISTING FENCING
Relocate Glenvar ballfield fencing to 3,600.00
Green Hill Park facilities (contract)........S
II. DUGOUT FENCING
Provide dugout fencing and player's
benches - four {4) existing Green • $ 3~g00.00
•.••.•.
Hill Park ballfields ................
...5 4 2,400.00
III OUTDOOR SOCCER FIELD (1) ....................
. S
Professional services (design and 6,000.00
•.
survey services) .............. " '
$ 000.00
30
.
,
Construction (contract)........ " '•$ 900.00
.
Goals/Nets .......................
Associated parking (gravel base/
5
5,500.00
chip and seal) .....................
IV LD FENCING).$
T-BALL BASEBALL FIELD {1) (N
T
O 39,400.00
. and
n
si
Professional services (de g
5 5,600.00
.......
survey services) ............
$ 000.00
29
.•....
Construction (contract)......
S
t fencing ,
5,800,00
..
Backstop/foul line/dugou
V. PARK DISTRICT MAINTENANCE CENTER (1).... ........5
00
800
5 19,000.00
Building (prefab - force account)..S
S .
,
3,000.00
Access (gravel) ....................
5 4,400.00
Compound fencing/gate ..............
5 200.00
3
Compound base (gravel) .............
.$ ,
2,600.00
Electrical ........................
VI. PARK CONCESSION/RESTROOM/STORAGE FACILITY
•..$ ?0,500.00
(CONTRACT) .....................•g•••" "
s - desi n....S
i .•.
~3 500.00
ce
Professiional serv
- building (prefab)...S 34,000.00
Construction
Utilities - water well/electricity.S 23,000.00
Restroom fixtures - installed......S 10,000.00
VII
,,,.$
PLAYGROUND APPARATUS (WOOD FORM)............
18,800.00
. (PURCHASE AND INSTALLATION - CONTRACT)
.$ 22,600.00
VIII.
,,
PICNIC SHELTER (CONTRACT)............
,,,,••..
Shelter - prefab {including
5
'
100.00
15
min.......
concrete base) 24' x 30
..$ ,
4,500.00
Construction .....................
..S 1,800.00
Picnic tables ....................
5 200.00
1
Grills/receptacles ................. ,
IX. SPLIT RAIL SECURITY FENCT_NG (2-RAIL)...
$
.........
11,000.00
,.$ 4,800.00
X PARK SIGNAGE/LANDSCAPING............" ' " '~•~•
. $ 235,900.00
""
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY,
VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER,
TUESDAY, OCTOBER 10, 1989
ORDINANCE ACCEPTING AN OFFER FOR AND AUTHORIZ-
ING THE SALE OF 10 ACRES, MORE OR LESS, IN THE
GLENVAR WEST PORTION OF ROANOKE COUNTY (SHAM-
ROCK FIELD)
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia, as follows:
1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.01 of the
Charter of Roanoke County, the subject property has been declared
to be surplus and is being made available for other public uses,
i.e. economic development; and
2. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the
Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading was held on September
26, 1989; and a second reading was held on October 24, 1989,
concerning the sale and disposition of 10 acres, more or less, in
the Glenvar West portion of Roanoke County (Shamrock field); and
3. That offers having been received for said property, the
offer of Atlantic and Pacific Inc. for Twenty-three Thousand
Dollars ($23,000) per acre to purchase 10 acres, more or less, for
Two Hundred Thirty Thousand Dollars ($230,000) is hereby accepted
and all other offers are rejected; and
4. That all proceeds from the sale of this real estate are
to be allocated to the development of Green Hill Park; and
5. That the County Administrator is authorized to execute
such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County
as are necessary to accomplish the conveyance of said property, all
of which shall be upon form approved by the County Attorney.
ACTION NUMBER
ITEM NUMBER
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: October 24, 1989
SUBJECT: Appointments to Committees, Commissions and Boards
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
Community Corrections Resources Board
One-year term of Edmund J. Kielty, Alternate. His term expired
August 13, 1988.
Health Department Board of Directors
The two-year term of Susan Adcock will expire November 26, 1989
Industrial Development Authority
Four-year terms of Billy H. Branch, Cave Spring District, and W.
Darnall Vinyard, Vinton District will expire on September 26,
1989.
Parks and Recreation Advisor Commission
Three-year term of Alice Gillespie, Hollins Magisterial District
expired June 30, 1989.
SUBMITTED BY:
APPROVED BY:
~" -
Mary H. Allen
Clerk to the Board
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
-------------
ACTION -----------------------
Approved ( ) Motion by: VOTE
Denied ( ) Yes No Abs
Received ( )
Garrett
Johnson
~'f °`i
Referred McGraw
To• Nickens
Robers
ACTION N0.
ITEM NUMBER J ""'
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: October 24, 1989
AGENDA ITEM: Appointments to the Court Service Unit Advisory
Council/Youth and Family Services Advisory Board
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
On December 13, 1988, the Board of Supervisors voted to continue
this Board and appoint new members. Michael Lazzuri, Director of
Court Services has contacted the present members of the Court
Service Unit Advisory Council/Youth and Family Services Advisory
Board to determine whether they wished to continue serving.
The following terms expired in 1988 or will expire in 1989.
Appointments to this committee are not made by magisterial
district; however, the magisterial district is listed for each
member.
Two-year term of James L. Trout, Vinton Magisterial District,
will expire March 22, 1989. Mr. Trout has not responded to Mr.
Lazzuri's letter.
Two-year term of Ted R. Powell, Cave Spring Magisterial District,
will expire March 22, 1989. Mr. Powell would like to be
reappointed.
Two-year term of Hoyt C. Rath, Vinton Magisterial District, will
expire March 22, 1989. Mr. Rath does not wish to serve another
term.
Two-year term of Dr. Andrew Archer, Vinton Magisterial District
expired March 22, 1988. Dr. Archer does not wish to be
reappointed.
In addition to the appointments listed above, it is necessary to
appoint four youth members, one each from Cave Spring High
School, Northside High School, Glenvar High School, William Byrd
High School. Mr. Lazzuri recommends that these appointments run
from September through September. Therefore, appointment made in
`•-
~~
1989 will expire September 1, 1989. Thereafter all terms will
expire September 1, coinciding with the school year.
SUBMITTED BY:
G2-e~~~
Mary H. Allen
Clerk to the Board
APPROVED BY:
~~
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
ACTION VOTE
Approved ( ) Motion by: Yes No Abs
Denied ( ) Garrett
Received ( ) Johnson
Referred McGraw
To• Nickens
Robers
2
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, OCTOBER 24, 1989
RESOLUTION NO. 102489-6 APPROVING AND
CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH
ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA
FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM L -
CONSENT AGENDA
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That that certain section of the agenda of the
Board of Supervisors for October 24, 1989, designated as Item L -
Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as
to each item separately set forth in said section designated
Items 1 through 3, inclusive, as follows:
1. Minutes of Meetings - December 13, 1988, January
4, 1989, January 10, 1989, January 24, 1989,
February 14, 1989
2. Request for Approval of Raffle Permit - William
Byrd High School Cheerleader Booster Club.
3. Request for acceptance of Twin Mountain Circle
into the Virginia Department of Transportation
Secondary System.
2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized
and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said
items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to
this resolution.
On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor
McGraw, and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisor Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTE:
Mary H. lien, Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Phillip Henry, Director, Engineering
December 13, 1988
~-.- _ i
373
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
Roanoke County Administration Center
3738 Brambleton Avenue, SW
Roanoke, Virginia 24018
December 13, 1988
The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, met this day at the Roanoke County
Administration Center, this being the second Tuesday, and the
only regularly scheduled meeting of the month of December, 1988.
IN RE: CALL TO ORDER
Chairman Garrett called the meeting to order at 3:05
p.m. The roll call was taken.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Lee Garrett, Vice Chairman Richard
Robers, Supervisors Bob L. Johnson, Steven
A. McGraw, Harry C. Nickens (arrived at
3:10 pm.)
MEMBERS ABSENT: None
STAFF PRESENT: Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator; John
M. Chambliss, Assistant County
Administrator for Human Services; John R.
Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator of
Community Services and Development; Don M.
Myers, Assistant County Administrator for
Management Services; Paul M. Mahoney,
County Attorney, Mary H. Allen, Deputy
Clerk;
IN RE: OPENING CEREMONIES
375
December 13, 1988
RESOLUTION 12i~88-2 OF CONGRATULATIONS TO BETSY
STARNES UPON BEING SELECTED AS MISS JOB'S
DAUGHTERS OF VIRGINIA
WHEREAS, Betsy Starnes, daughter of Mr. and Mrs. Starnes, has
been active in Job's Daughters, an organization associated with the
Masons, and is a former Honor Queen of Bethel 7; and
WHEREAS, on November 26, 1988, in Norfolk, Virginia, she was
honored by being selected from 44 contestants and 10 finalists from
throughout the state as Miss Job's Daughters of Virginia; and
WHEREAS, this honor recognizes her knowledge of the Job's
Daughters rituals, which strive to teach young women ages 11 and over
to become stronger individuals and stresses such attributes as
integrity.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of
Roanoke County, Virginia, wishes to express its congratulations to
Miss Starnes for attaining this high honor in Job's Daughters; and
FURTHER, the Board of Supervisors expresses its pride to Miss
Starnes, a Junior at William Byrd High School, for this outstanding
achievement and wishes her continued success in her future endeavors.
On motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by Supervisor Robers
and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, McGraw, Nickens, Robers, Garrett
NAYS: None
377
December 13, 1988
FURTHER, the Board of Supervisors does express its best
wishes for a happy, restful and productive retirement.
On motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by Supervisor
Robers and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, McGraw, Nickens, Robers, Garrett
NAYS: None
4 Res olutions of Ap pr eciat ion t o Dot Ell er, Barbara J.
_ Fasnacht and Ke n Bowen for c ont ribu tions to their community.
Supervisor McGraw moved to to adopt the prepared resolutions
for presentation to Ms. Eller, Ms. Fasnacht and Mr. Bowen. The
motion was seconded by Supervisor Robers and carried by the
following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
RESOLUTION 121388-5 EXPRESSING THE APPRECIATION OF
THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY TO DOT
ELLER FOR OUTSTANDING CONTRIBUTIONS TO HER
COMMUNITY
WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors is indebted
to its citizens who offer their time, talent and energy through
many volunteer activities and desires that these efforts be
recognized in an appropriate manner; and
December 13, 1988
37 9
WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors is indebted
to its citizens who offer their time, talent and energy through
many volunteer activities and desires that these efforts be
recognized in an appropriate manner; and
WHEREAS, Barbara Fasnacht served with distinction as
President of Cherokee Hills Homeowners Association for 1988/89,
having served one previous term as President; and
WHEREAS, under her leadership, the Cherokee Hills Homeowners
Association was instrumental in getting the roads in Cherokee
Hills Subdivision brought into the state secondary system, and
helped to reduce speeding in the neighborhood; and
WHEREAS, she provided a calm positive approach in efforts to
solve problems with the water system and the potential of a
future landfill site in the community, and because of her
concern, was appointed as a member of the Roanoke County Citizens
Landfill Advisory Council in July, 1988.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors
of Roanoke County, Virginia, expresses its deep appreciation and
the appreciation of the citizens of Roanoke County to BARBARA
FASNACHT for her leadership and outstanding contributions to
the quality of life in her community, and Roanoke County.
On motion of Supervisor McGraw, seconded by Supervisor
Robers and carried by the following recorded vote:
38 1
December 13, 1988
of Roanoke County, Virginia, expresses its deep appreciation and
the appreciation of the citizens of Roanoke County to KENNETH
D. BOWEN for his leadership and outstanding contributions to
the quality of life in his community, and Roanoke County.
On motion of Supervisor McGraw, seconded by Supervisor
Robers and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, McGraw, Nickens, Robers, Garrett
NAYS: None
IN RE NEW BUSINESS
1 Receipt of 1987/88 Annual Audit.
Director of Finance, Diane Hyatt presented the report
of the annual audit and announced that the County will be able to
add $1,656,795 to its current fund balance. She advised that
this was the first year that proration of personal property tax
was in effect for the full year. Staff recommends that the Board
accept the audit for 1987-88 and that $1,656,795 be appropriated
to the Fund Balance.
Supervisor Garrett moved to approve the staff recommendation.
The motion was seconded by Supervisor Nickens and carried by the
following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
38 3
December 13, 1988
~ Recrues for support for a Regional Jail Work Farm.
Sheriff Michael Kavanaugh reported that he would like to
provide a jail annex for lower security prisoners and would like
for it to be a regional annex for surrounding localities from
several planning districts. He recommended that the Virginia
Department of Corrections conduct a needs assessment survey. He
also recommended that this annex would be placed in Roanoke
County and under the supervision of the Roanoke County Sheriff.
County Administrator Elmer Hodge advised that he is
requesting support from the Board for the regional concept of a
work farm at this time. The specifics of the plan will be
brought back to the Board.
Supervisor Nickens moved to adopt the prepared resolution.
The motion was seconded by Supervisor McGraw and carried by the
following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
RESOLUTION 121388-9 OF SUPPORT FOR THE CONCEPT OF
A REGIONAL WORK FARM FOR NON-VIOLENT OFFENDERS
WHEREAS, there exists a need in the Roanoke Valley for
a productive use of non-violent offenders presently being housed
in the valley's jails; and
38 5
December 13, 1988
4 Adoption of Amended Employee Han ook:
Director of Human Resources Keith Cook reported that
the final draft of the employee handbook is now ready for
adoption. Changes requested at the November 22nd meeting have
been incorporated.
Supervisor Nickens moved to adopt the Employee Handbook
effective January 1, 1989. The motion was seconded by Supervisor
McGraw and carried by a unanimous recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens and
Garrett
~yg; None
Reques for amendm ent to Em ploy ee Ha ndbook to allow
mpensatorv time or overt ime pay f or non-e xemp t emp lovee~
Following discussion of this issue, Supervisor McGraw
moved to continue the item to January 24, 1989. The motion was
seconded by Supervisor Johnson. At that time, the staff will
present examples of compensatory time and overtime pay for a
variety of job position. The staff will also survey private and
public sectors on their policies concerning compensatory time and
overtime pay. The motion carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
38 7
December 13, 1988
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
Recruest for amendment to State Code reQardinv
icrnation of Clerk to the Board of Supervisors.
Mr. Hodge reported that he is requesting Board support for
• an amendment to the State Code that would allow Roanoke County to
appoint a Clerk to the Board of Supervisors other than the County
Administrator. The State Code presently allows this only for
counties with populations of between 100,000 and 143,000. If
approved, this will become part of the the legislative package to
the General Assembly.
Supervisor Nickens moved to approve the staff recommendation.
The motion was seconded by Supervisor McGraw and carried by the
following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers,McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
~_ approval of Rural Addi ion Priority Lis in
December 13, 1988 3 8 9
may take no action. However, if no action is taken, a permanent
injunction will be effective enjoining the Board from preventing
the use of the property for B-1 use.
Roger Lorden, 4390 Sheldon Drive advised he had attended the
court hearing and felt the land should be developed in
conformance with the 419 Frontage Plan. He requested that the
Board challenge the judge's ruling.
Supervisor Nickens moved that the Board convey to the court
that they will comply and not make an appeal and that the costs
be covered from the court order. The motion was seconded by
Supervisor Garrett.
In response to a question from Supervisor Johnson, Mr.
Mahoney responded that Supervisor Nicken's motion would not
specifically include the proffered conditions. He suggested that
the Board approve the rezoning which would include the proffers.
Supervisor McGraw offered a substitute motion to rezone the
property with proffered conditions and cover the court costs.
The substitute motion was seconded by Supervisor Robers and
carried by the following unanimous recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Garrett
NAYS: Nickens
39
December 13, 1988
SUPERVISOR MCGRAW announced that the Grayson
Commission's next meeting is January 7th and the report will be
complete by January 11. He also requested that the County
Administrator investigate funding of the Regional Partnership,
including how much of the funding goes toward economic
development, and how much each participating locality funds
economic development in their individual budgets.
IN RE: CONSENT AGENDA
Supervisor Nickens moved that the Consent Agenda be
approved with Items 8 and 10 removed for a separate vote. The
motion was seconded by Supervisor Johnson and carried by the
following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
RESOLUTION N0. 121388-16 APPROVING AND CONCURRING
IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF
SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS
ITEM I - CONSENT AGENDA
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That that certain section of the agenda of the Board of
393
December 13, 1988
On motion of Supervisor Nickens with Items 8 and 10 removed
for discussion and a separate vote; seconded by Supervisor
Johnson and the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
~eaues for a Bingo Permit for the Moose Lodge 284:
Supervisor Johnson moved to approve the Bingo Permit for the
Moose Lodge 284. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Nickens
and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
ABSTAIN: Supervisor McGraw
Request from Marie Mitchell to waive the water
Qrdinance: Supervisor Robers expressed concern about making a
special exception for one person and not for others with similar
problems. Utility Director Clifford Craig advised that this was
a sincere hardship situation which could cost an elderly woman
$60,000.
Supervisor Johnson moved to approve the waiver. The motion
was seconded by Supervisor Nickens and carried by the following
recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
39 5
December 13, 1988
Supervisor Johnson moved to continue this item to New
Business on January 10, when there will be adequate opportunity
for discussion and input. The motion was seconded by Supervisor
McGraw.
Mr. Hodge advised that action on this item will only allow
the concept to go forward for the bid process. Assistant County
Administrator John Chambliss explained how the process will go
forward. The motion was unanimously defeated by a recorded vote.
Supervisor McGraw moved to allow the staff to continue its
study of a shared library automation system through the bidding
process without a financial commitment at this time. The motion
was seconded by Supervisor Robers. There was discussion on the
merits of going forward with the automated system versus a single
library system which could then be automated. The motion carried
by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw,
NAYS: Supervisors Nickens, Garrett
5. Accounts Paid - November 1988
IN RE: EXECUTIVE SESSION
December 13, 1988 3 9 7
At 7:03 p.m., Chairman Garrett reconvened the meeting. He
announced that an item had been added to be heard following
public hearings concerning a resoulution concurring in the
temporary closing of Starkey Road and Penn Forest Boulevard.
IN RE: PUBLIC HEARINGS
1288-1 Petition of Fekas Homes. Inc. to rezone a 3.75
acre tract from RE, Residential Estates to M-2,
Industrial, located at the northeast corner of the
intersection of 16th Street and Carlisle Avenue in
the Vinton Magisterial District (r^~ITINIIED -
WILL BE HEARD BY THE PLANNIN MMI I N N
.T~riiJARY 3 . 19 8 9 )
1288-2 Petition of Parkway Meadows Develouers to vacate a
portion of State Route 116 right of way on the
south side of Jae Valley Road directly east of the
intersection of Jae Valley Road and Sterling Road
in the Vinton Magisterial District. (CONTINUED -
WILL BE HEARD BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION ON
JANUARY 3, 1989)
1288-3 Petition of Robert and Patricia Crouse to rezone a
4.82 acre tract from B-1 Business to M-2,
Industrial to operate a trucking terminal, located
approximately 0.5 mile east of I-81 exit 39 (Dixie
Caverns on the south side of West Main Street
(Route 460) in the Catawba Magisterial District.
CONTINUED TO 1/24/88
1288-4 Petition of Radford and Comuany Builders to rezone
a 0.6764 acre tract from R-3, Residential to B-2,
Business to construct a convenience store at the
northeast corner of Glen Heather Drive and
Electric road (Route 419) in the Windsor Hills
Magisterial District.
Planner Jon Hartley presented the staff report advising
39 9
December 13, 1988
Supervisor Johnson moved to approve the petition with
proffered conditions. The motion was seconded by Supervisor
Nickens and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
FINAL ORDER
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDERED that the aforementioned parcel
of land which is contained in the Roanoke County Tax Maps as
Parcel 76/-7-02-52 and recorded in Deed Book and legally
described below, be rezoned from R-3 District to B-2 District
BE IT FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this order be
transmitted to the Secretary of the Planning Commission and that
he be directed to reflect that change on the official zoning map
of Roanoke County.
0.676 acre parcel of land, generally located on
the northeast corner of Glen Heather Drive and
Route 419 in the Windsor Hills Magisterial
District.
PROFFER OF CONDITION
1, Property will be developed in substantial conformity
with the site plan dated November 3, 1988.
December 13, 1988 4 Q 1
Ray Robrecht, attorney for the petitioner presented his
report. He advised that the business will employ five people and
the petitioner will have a buffer that will be R-3 residential
which will address the neighborhood concern.
Mr. Robrecht advised that they were not, at the present
time, planning to sell gasoline. Supervisor Johnson advised that
this is an old dump site and asked that buffhide tanks and a
monitoring system be installed to avoid future leakage. Mr.
Hartley responded that as of January 1989 the EPA will require a
monitoring system and special tanks. Following discussion,
Supervisor Johnson directed the staff to prepare an ordinance on
inground storage of gasoline tanks by February 1989.
Supervisor Johnson moved to grant the petition. The motion
was seconded by Supervisor Robers and carried by the following
recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
FINAL ORDER
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDERED that the aforementioned parcel
of land which is contained in the Roanoke County Tax Maps as
Parcel and recorded in Deed Book and legally described below,
be rezoned from B-2 District to B-3 District
December 13, 1988 ~ O `~
2. Facility will not be used for
upholstering, major repairing, rebuilding,
and fender work or repairing or overhauling
10,000 lbs. gross weight.
3. There will be no overnight outside park
junk vehicles.
4. Petitioner will install and maintain
vehicle painting,
reconditioning, body
of trucks exceeding
ing of inoperative or
Type D screening as
recommended by County staff.
5. Petitioner will install outside lighting in accordance with
recommendations and approval of County staff.
6, Total signage will not exceed 180 sq. ft. No temporary or
portable signs or billboards shall be permitted on the property.
IN RE: NEW BUSINESS ADDITION
1 Resolution concurring in the temporarv closing of
rkev Road (State Route 904) and Penn Forest Boulevard (State
R ute 897) for a construction pro-iect by the Va. Department of
Transportation.
Mr. Mahoney reported that the Virginia Department of
Transportation needed a resolution concurring with the temporary
closing of Starkey Road in order to go forward with the
construction project.
'~ 0 5
December 13, 1988
1. That said Board does hereby concur in the closing of the
following routes as a result of Project No. 0904-080-215-C501 by
the Virginia Department of Transportation for a period of
approximately 30 days each:
Starkey Road (State Route 904) from the
intersection of Penn Forest (State Route 897) top
the intersection of Electric Road (Route 419)
Penn Forest Boulevard (Route 897) from the
intersection of Starkey Road (State Route 904) to
the intersection of Chaparral Drive (State Route
800) .
2, That the Deputy Clerk of the Board is hereby directed
to deliver a certified copy of this resolution to the Virginia
Department of Transportation.
IN RE: FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES
1 Ordinance authorizing the acquisition of an_interest in
n eight acre trac t known as the North Clear Zone uroperty in
g x hange for the convevanc to the Roanoke Regional Airport
~o~
December 13, 1988
At 8:50 p.m., Chairman Garrett declared the meeting
adjourned.
Lee Garrett, Chairman
January 9, 1989 ~ Q 8
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
Roanoke County Administration Center
3738 Brambleton Avenue, SW
Roanoke, Virginia 24018
January 4, 1989
The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, met this day at the Roanoke County
Administration Center, this being the Organizational meeting for
1989.
IN RE: CALL TO ORDER
Chairman Garrett called the meeting to order at 9:05
a.m. The roll call was taken.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Lee Garrett, Vice Chairman Richard
Robers, Supervisors Bob L. Johnson, Steven
A. McGraw, Harry C. Nickens
MEMBERS ABSENT: None
STAFF PRESENT: Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator; John
M. Chambliss, Assistant County
Administrator for Human Services; John R.
Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator of
Community Services and Development; Don M.
Myers, Assistant County Administrator for
Management Services; Paul M. Mahoney,
Rio
January 4, 1989
WHEREAS, The Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County does
hereby express its profound and most sincere appreciation to Lee
Garret for his dedication, creativity and excellence in the
performance of his many vital responsibilities during his tenure
as Chairman of the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors during
1988; and
WHEREAS, during this period of time, Lee Garrett has
served with distinction and it is altogether fitting and proper
that his enlightened concern, meaningful initiative and hours of
devotion to the needs of the citizens of Roanoke County be duly
recognized and honored.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of
Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, on behalf of the
citizens of Roanoke County, and on its own part, expresses
heartfelt appreciation to Lee Garrett for his many significant
contributions to Roanoke County during his term as Chairman.
On motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by Supervisor
McGraw, and upon the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
IN RE: ORGANIZATION OF COUNTY BOARD
1 Election of Officers
412
January 4, 1989
3 Re solu tion Es ta blis hing Bv l aws, Rules o f Ord er and
Sche du le of Bo ard mee ting s fo r 198 8.
Supervisor Nickens moved to approve the prepared
resolution The motion was seconded by Supervisor McGraw and
carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
RESOLUTION 148 -2 ESTABLISHING A MEETING SCHEDULE
FOR THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY FOR
CALENDAR YEAR 1989 AND ADOPTING RULES OF PROCEDURE
FOR SUCH MEETINGS
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia as follows:
1. That for calendar year 1989 the regular meetings of
the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County shall be held on the
second and f ourth Tuesdays of each month at the Roanoke County
Administration Center on Brambleton Avenue S. W., Roanoke County,
Virginia. The meetings of each month shall commence at 3:00
o'clock p.m.; provided however, that all public hearings shall be
scheduled for the second meeting of the month and that said
public hearings shall commence at 7:00 o'clock p.m.; and
January 4, 1989
Under the leadership of a sterling Sesquicentennial committee we
commemorated the 150th anniversary of our County's founding.
From March through December, from an opening gala to the
ceremonial burying of a time capsule, citizens participated in a
myriad of special events to honor the occasion....A Beautiful
Beginning.
History will record that Roanoke County stood tall at the
end of its first century and a half.
On June 30, 1986, the undesignated fund balance for Roanoke
County stood at $1,585,000. One year ago, at this time, we
stated that the fund balance on June 30 had grown to $2,064,000.
I am very pleased to report today, as of June 30, 1988, the
undesignated fund balance reached $3,037,000. A jump from 3.2
percent in 1987 to 5.3 percent in 1988. Our objective is to
maintain a minimum of 3 to 5 percent of the general fund as fund
balance.
One problem converging on 1988 was, and to some extent still
is, the cleanup of the defunct Dixie Caverns landfill, a problem
that has existed since the closing of the dump site in the '70s.
So f ar $879,000 has gone into this project, with an additional
w
.,4,1.6
January 4, 1989
The news that Mountain View Elementary School has been
nationally recognized for its excellence in education, again
attests to the exceptional quality of instruction in Roanoke
County Schools. It was news that was met with elation by this
body. The Board's commitment to education has not, and will not,
waver. We will return to the 1989 session of the General
Assembly seeking funds to meet state imposed mandates for quality
education. At the same time, cooperating with school officials,
we will continue to explore initiatives which lead to cost
effective operation.
And now, to the question of the hour: What will be Roanoke
County's role in the governmental consolidation efforts?
There is no doubt in our collective minds that a sufficient
number of signatures has been collected to compel both Roanoke
City and Roanoke County to negotiate a consolidation agreement.
The Jaycees will formally present their petitions to the
governing bodies of both localities very soon, after which
negotiations will commence.
-,
Choosing those who will lead the effort on behalf of Roanoke
County is a responsibility not lightly taken. My fellow
January 4, 1989 ~ ~ 8
At 9:20 a.m., Supervisor Johnson moved to adjourn. The
motion was seconded by Supervisor Robers and carried by the
following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
Lee Garrett, Chairman
January 10, 1989 ? ~ 9
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
Roanoke County Administration Center
3738 Brambleton Avenue, SW
Roanoke, Virginia 24018
January 10, 1989
The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, met this day at the Roanoke County
Administration Center, this being the second Tuesday, and the
first regularly scheduled meeting of the month of January, 1989.
IN RE: CALL TO ORDER
Chairman Garrett called the meeting to order at 3:05
p.m. The roll call was taken.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Lee Garrett, Vice Chairman Richard
Robers, Supervisors Bob L. Johnson, Steven
A. McGraw, Harry C. Nickens
MEMBERS ABSENT: None
STAFF PRESENT: Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator; John
M. Chambliss, Assistant County
Administrator for Human Services; John R.
Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator of
Community Services and Development; Don M.
Myers, Assistant County Administrator for
Management Services; Paul M. Mahoney,
January 10, 1989 ~ 2
IN RE; NEW BUSINESS
1 ReQ-~est of CBL Management for County participation
in extension of water lines.
Director of Utilities Clifford Craig presented the
report recommending that Roanoke County participate one-half the
excess cost up to an amount of $41,000.00, in the form of a lump
sum reimbursement agreement payable after acceptance of the water
line and verification of the excess cost by Roanoke County. Mr.
Craig advised that this was similar to other requests.
Mr. Tingle with CBL Management was present and advised
the Board members that they planned to pay part of the costs.
Following discussion, Supervisor Robers moved to
postpone this item to January 24, 1989 for a study of
calculations of revenue which would include the County
participation in the water line. The motion was seconded by
Supervisor McGraw and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
2 Request for Planning Commission review of Sx~ecial
Exception Permits for Demnlit-ion and Sanitary Landfills.
. 42 3.
January 10, 1989
committees must travel for the purpose of determining action or
recommendation. Mr. Hodge recommended that the Board of Zoning
Appeals receive a salary in the future of $250 per member.
Supervisor Johnson moved to approve the salary for the
Board of Zoning Appeals and requested that they be informed of
this action. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Nickens and
carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
4 Reouest for amendment to the Emnlovee Handbook
allow overtime leave or overtime pav for nonexempt employees•
A-11089-3
Mr. Hodge advised that the Sheriff's Department
requested this option of taking overtime leave rather than
overtime pay in an effort to reduce the budgetary impact of
overtime pay. The handbook would extend this option to all
employees. Staff recommends approval of this handbook amendment.
The overtime leave would be used by the end of the following pay
period.
In response to a question from Supervisor Robers, Mr.
Hodge explained that the option was for all employees instead of
just those in the Sheriff's Department because it could cause
confusion in the Fire and Rescue Department, gouls give
January 10, 1989 ~ Z 5
AYES: Supervisors Robers, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: Supervisors Johnson, McGraw
5 New Regional Landfill Sites.
A-11089-4
Assistant County Administrator John Hubbard reported
that the County has assumed the responsibility for siting the new
regional landfill and has chosen five of the fifteen sites
originally identified. An additional site has now been located
in the Red Hill area off Route 220. Staff is requesting that
this site be added to the other five as one of the top sites to
go forward, and that the final report be delayed until after
final testing.
Supervisor Robers pointed out that this site was not
even included in the top sites originally identified by
consultants and engineers. He felt that the County should
proceed with the original plans and wait for the testing of the
top five sites.
Supervisor McGraw advised that all possible sites
should be studied. Mr. Hodge explained the process that each
site will go through and that this site had some features that
should include it in the top sites. Supervisor Robers responded
that he objected to an alteration of the five sites that were
previously agreed upon. Mr. Hubbard reported that this site was
January 10, 1989 4 ~ 7
5 Approval to apply for grant ~o purchase CORTR~
bus•
X11089-5
There was no discussion of this issue.
Supervisor Nickens moved to authorization RADAR to
apply for grant monies to pay for a new bus equiped with a
handicapped lift. The motion was seconded by Supervisor McGraw
and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
7 Adoption of Resolution endorsing a single economic
velopment effort under the direction of the Regional
Partnership.
Supervisor Nickens presented the report advising that
unified economic voice for economic development for the Roanoke
Valley would increase funding for the Regional Partnership and
would also present a unified marketing approach.
Supervisor Nickens moved to adopt the prepared
resolution. The motion was seconded by Supervisor McGraw and
carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
42 g
January 10, 1989
direct that their economic development financial resources and
personnel be incorporated under this organization.
FURTHER, The Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia, directs that a copy of this resolution be forwarded to
the governing bodies of the localities who participate in the
Regional Partnership, and that they be requested to endorse this
action.
On motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by Supervisor
McGraw, and upon the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
IN RE; REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS
1 Recruest for a Work Session on Januarv 24. 1989~n
the Solid Waste Collection Plan for 1989-90.
This item was deferred to the 1989-90 budget process.
IN RE; REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS
Mr. Hodge reminded the Board that a public hearing on
the budget will be held on January 24, 1989.
431
January 10, 1989
Supervisor Nickens expressed concern that a
representative from the sign industry was not serving on the
sign committee and that they were not informed of the proposed
ordinance. Chairman Garrett directed Mr. Hodge and the chairman
of the Planning Commission to meet with members of the sign
industry so that representation from that community can serve on
the sign committee.
The following citizens spoke concerning this ordinance.
1. Mr. F. T. Turner, Box 8246, Roanoke, President of
Dominion Signs, was opposed to the ordinance because he felt that
the ordinance was anti-business. He pointed out there was
already regulations concerning signs in Roanoke County. He
recommended that the sign committee be equally represented
between pro and con.
2. Frank Kinsey 3721 Hummingbird Lane, Vice President
of Kinsey-Crane Sign Company. He advised they are willing to
work with the County on a sign ordinance but were opposed to a
prohibition of signs. He asked that this ordinance be used only
as a temporary solution until a new sign ordinance is adopted.
3. Don Witt, 3332 Kenwick Trail, chairman of the
Planning Commission described the process by which the sign
committee would prepare the sign ordinance.
January 10, 1989 4 3 3
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That pursuant to provisions of Section 18.04 of the
Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading concerning the
acquisition of a reversionary interest from the City of Roanoke
in the eight (8) acre tract known as the North Clear Zone
property in exchange for the conveyance of a reversionary
interest to the City of Roanoke in the eight (8) acre tract known
as the Ida Mae Holland tract was held on December 13, 1988. A
second reading on this matter was held on January 10, 1988.
2, That the acquisition of the reversionary interest
in the eight (8) acres, more or less, known as the North Clear
Zone property more particularly described as located adjacent to
the Airport Clear Zone property in exchange for the conveyance of
a reversionary interest to the City of Roanoke in the eight (8)
acres, more or less, known as the Ida Mae Holland tract more
particularly described as located adjacent to Thirlane Road and
the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission property is hereby
authorized and approved; and
3. That the County Administrator is authorized to
execute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke
County as are necessary to accomplish the acquisition and
conveyance of the interest in said properties, all of which shall
be upon form approved by the County Attorney.
January 10, 1989 ~ 3
-- Fifth Planning District Commission (3-year term expires
6/30/90)
--Audit Committee
-- Regional Airport Commission
-- Consolidation Negotiating Committee
Steven A. McGraw
-- Cablevision Committee
-- Blue Ridge Region Commission
-- Roanoke Valley Cooperation Committee
Dr Harry ~ Nickens
-- Cablevision Committee
-- Transportation and Safety Commission (4-year term expires
4/1/91)
-- Court Community Corrections Policy Board ( 3-year term expires
12/21/91)
-- Consolidation Negotiation Committee
Richard W Robers
-- Western Virginia Development Corporation
-- Fifth Planning District Commission (2-year term expires
6/30/89)
-- Clean Valley Committee
-- Roanoke Valley Cooperation Committee
IN RE; REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS
~~pPrvisor Johnson directed the County Administrator to
begin setting up meetings in the community for citizen input on
the consolidation issues.
;ur~rvisor McGraw announced that the Grayson Commission
has agreed to put forth sample bills for consideration. He also
advised he had set up three community meetings in the Catawba
Magisterial District to explain the initial consolidation process.
43 7
January 10, 1989
1. Minutes of Meeting - July 12, 1988
2. Request for acceptance of Scarlet Oak Drive into
the Virginia Department of Transportation
Secondary System.
3. Request for acceptance of Lakemont Drive into the
Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary
System.
4. Ac k n o rta d on ethat the followingD roadst havet been
Transpo
accepted into the Secondary System:
a. 0.06 miles of Route 1337 (Bear Ridge Circle)
b. 0.11 miles of Route 1006 (Stonebridge Circle)
5. Acceptance of a drainage easement being dedicated
by David Mangrum and Pamela Mangrum across Lot 13,
Block 2, Section 2, Forest Edge.
6. Acceptance of a drainage easement donated by the
U. S. Department of Interior across the Blue Ridge
Parkway - Montgomery Village Subdivision.
2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized
and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said
items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to
this resolution.
On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor
McGraw, and upon the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None AMENDED 3/1/89
RESOLUTION THE VIRGIN A DEPARTMENT OFCTPRANSPORTATIOIN EMONT
DRIVE INTO
SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM
January 10, 1989 4 3 9
the same is hereby established as a public road to become a part
of the state secondary system of highways in Roanoke County, only
from and after notification of official acceptance of said street
or highway by the Virginia Department of Transportation.
On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor
McGraw and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
RESOLUTION 1089-8.a REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF
SCARLET OAK DRIVE INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1, That this matter came this day to be heard upon the
proceedings herein, and upon the application of Scarlet Oak Drive
from its intersection with Wood Haven Road (Route 628) to the
existing Falls Development for a distance of 0.20 miles, to be
accepted and made a part of the Secondary System of State
Highways under Section 33.1-229 of the Virginia State Code.
2, That it appears to the Board that drainage easements
and a fifty (50) foot right-of-way for said road have been
dedicated by virtue of a certain map known as Extension of
Scarlet Oak Drive recorded in Plat Book 11, Page 76, of the
records of the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke
~'4 1
January 10, 1989
NAYS: None
1. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance
2. General Fund Unappropriated Balance
3. Board Contingency Fund
4. Income Analysis as of November 30, 1988.
5. Statement of Expenditures as of November 30,
1988
6. Status Report on Street Light Replacement
Program.
IN RE: CITIZEN COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS
Patrick Cosmato, business owner in Roanoke City and
Roanoke County, expressed concern about the County taking a
regional approach to issues including consolidation, and also
about the regional airport commission, because of the structure
of the commission which includes a majority of members from
443
January 10, 1989
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
IN RE: ADJOURNMENT
At 6:21 p.m., Chairman Garrett declared the meeting
adjourned.
January 24, 1989 ~ 4 ~ .~
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
Roanoke County Administration Center
3738 Brambleton Avenue, SW
Roanoke, Virginia 24018
January 24, 1989
The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, met this day at the Roanoke County
Administration Center, this being the fourth Tuesday, and the
second regularly scheduled meeting of the month of January, 1989.
IN RE: CALL TO ORDER
Chairman Garrett called the meeting to order at 3:05z
p.m. The roll call was taken.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Lee Garrett, Vice Chairman Richard
Robers, Supervisors Bob L. Johnson, Steven
A. McGraw, Harry C. Nickens
MEMBERS ABSENT: None
STAFF PRESENT: Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator; John
M. Chambliss, Assistant County
Administrator for Human Services; John R.
Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator of
Community Services and Development; Don M.
Myers, Assistant County Administrator for
Management Services; Paul M. Mahoney,
~+ 4 6
January 24, 1989
due primarily to prorating of personal property taxes. As of
June 30, 1988, the Fund Balance was $3,037,141 or 5.32 percent.
Ms. Hyatt presented an analysis of the revenue.
IN RE: NEW BUSINESS
1. Request of CBL Management for County oarticipa i n
n extension of water lines (Continued from January 10. 1989).
A-12489-1
Utility Director Clifford Craig advised that this item
was continued from January 10 so that staff could study the
impact that the water line would have on the Utility Fund and
General Fund. He advised that the Utility Fund will recover
approximately $25,000 within the next five years, assuming
development proceeds. The estimated increase to the General Fund
is $72,000 in real estate and sales tax.
In response to a question from Supervisor Nickens, Mr.
Craig reported that this request is consistent with other
developers except this developer must invest $40,000 more because
the County is only recommending that one-half of the excess funds
be reimbursed.
Supervisor Nickens moved to approve County
participation of one-half the excess cost up to $41,000 and that
January 24, 1989 4 4 B
3 Authorization to settle pending litigation with
John Hall & Company for outstanding utility bills.
County Attorney Paul Mahoney reported that there are
three plaintiffs involved in this litigation. The case involves
a dispute regarding the fact that the plaintiffs exchanged free
sewer service for a donated sewer easement. When the County
acquired the sewer system, the plaintiffs were charged for sewage
usage, and filed suit against the County. The County has settled
with one litigant. It is recommended that the Board of
Supervisors authorize the County Administrator to execute an
agreement; that payment of $500 be accepted as settlement of the
outstanding utility bill; and that the County install a meter.
This settlement is similar to a settlement made with one of the
other litigants.
In response to a question from Supervisor Nickens, Mr.
Mahoney advised that there has been a large amount of time and
expense spent on this case, and the chances of success in court
are slight.
Mr. Hodge explained why a meter was being installed as
part of the agreement.
Supervisor McGraw moved to approve the staff
recommendation. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Garrett.
45 0
January 24, 1989
Morgan Griffith, Mr. Butler's attorney was also present
and reported that Mr. Butler had not been paid for his property
when the County began to destroy the structure. In response to a
question from Supervisor Garrett as to why Mr. Butler did not sue
the contractor, Mr. Griffith replied that they plan to file suit
against both the County and the contractor, but cannot proceed
until this hearing is resolved.
Supervisor Garrett pointed out that there was an eight
week notice sent to the property owners about the project.
Supervisor Johnson moved to deny the claim so that the
suit may go forward. The motion was seconded by Supervisor
McGraw and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
IN RE: REQUEST FOR WORK SESSIONS
A work session was set for February 14, 1989 on
Landfill and Recycling.
IN RE: REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. Re quest f or Public He arinct on Februarv 14. 1989 tQ
' rrow short term in antic ipation of t axes
452
January 24, 1989
IN RE: REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS
c„*+orvisor Johnson moved that Paul Mahoney bring back
to the Board members a draft anti-cruise ordinance. The motion
was seconded by Supervisor Robers and carried by the following
unanimous recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
Supervisor Johnson also requested the following: (1)
That Chairman Garrett appoint Economic Development Director Tim
Gubula to the Convention and Visitors Bureau; (2) that a
Resolution of Appreciation be prepared to present to Art Whitaker
who has been with Piedmont Airlines for 41 years; (3) that copies
of the Roanoke County History Book and Sesquicentennial Coins be
given to the state legislators, Governor Baliles, Lt. Governor
Wilder, Attorney General Mary Sue Terry, and our federal
legislators, with funding coming from the Board Contingency Fund.
~iig Prvisor Robers reported that the Roanoke Valley
Cooperation Committee is working with the Chamber of Commerce to
invite business leaders from Northern Virginia to the Roanoke
Valley. He also requested that the staff investigate with
- 454
January 24, 1989
Board of Supervisors for Janury 24, 1989, designated as Item J -
Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to
each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1
through 6, inclusive as follows:
1, Confirmation of appointment to the Community
Corrections Policy Board.
2. Acceptance of water and sewer facilities serving
Canterbury Park Section 3.
3. Acceptance of water and sewer facilities serving
Canterbury Park Section 4.
4 Request for acceptance of Westbriar Court into the
. Va. Department of Transportation Secondary System.
5. Request for acceptance of a portion of Cavalier
f
Drive and Cavalier Court into the Va. Dept. o
Transportation Secondary System.
6. Acceptance of sewer facilities serving Penn Forest
Wesleyan Church.
2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized
and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said
items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to
this resolution.
RESOLUTION 1.2489-4.d REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF
WESTBRIAR COURT INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM
' BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
45 g
January 24, 1989
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, McGraw, Nickens, Robers, Garrett
NAYS: None
RESOLUTION 12489-4.e REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF A
PORTION OF CAVALIER DRIVE AND CAVALIER COURT
INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That this matter came this day to be heard upon the
proceedings herein, and upon the application of Cavalier Drive
from a point 120' west of its intersection with Gloucester Court
to the intersection with Salisbury Drive and 0.05 miles of
Cavalier Court from its intersection with Cavalier Drive to the
terminus at the cul-de-sac, to be accepted and made a part of the
Secondary System of State Highways under Section 33.1-229 of the
Virginia State Code.
2. That it appears to the Board that drainage easements
and a fifty (50) foot right-of-way for said roads have been
dedicated by virtue of a certain map known as Section No. 3
Canterbury Park Subdivision which map was recorded in Plat Book
10, Page 33, of the records of the Clerk's Office of the Circuit
Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, on December 17, 1986, and that
by reason of the recordation of said map no report from a Board
of Viewers, nor consent or donation of right-of-way from the
45 8
January 24, 1989
6. Income Analysis and Statement of Expenditures as
of December 31, 1988.
IN RE: EXECUTIVE SESSION
At 5:10 p.m., Supervisor Garrett moved to go into
Executive Session pursuant to the Code of Virginia Section 201-
344 (a) (1) to discuss consolidation; (7) to discuss a legal
matter, a drainage request; and (7) to discuss a legal matter,
School Board. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Johnson and
carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Supervisor McGraw
IN RE; OPEN SESSION
At 5:45 p.m., Supervisor Garrett moved to .return to
Open Session. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Johnson and
carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
IN RE: RECESS
January 24, 1989
4b 0
At 5:45 p.m., Chairman Garrett declared a dinner
recess.
EVENING SESSION (7:00 P.M.)
Chairman Garrett announced that the following petitions
were advertised but will not. be heard. They have been referred
to the Planning Commission for recommendation.
Petition of .7~e Bandy and Son, Inc. for a
Special Use Permit to operate a private
construction debris landfill.
Petition of samual R. Carter III for a
Special Use Permit to operate a private
construction debris landfill.
IN RE: PUBLIC HEARINGS
189-1 Public Hearing to receive written or oral
comments for items to be included in the
budget for 1989-90 fiscal year.
County Administrator Elmer Hodge explained that this
public hearing was set for citizen comment and input on the
budget before the staff begins to prepare the 1989-90 budget.
The following citizens spoke concerned items for the
proposed 1989-90 fiscal year budget.
462
January 24, 1989
The Planning Commission recommended denial of the rezoning by a
unanimous vote.
Doug Brinkman, attorney for the petitioner, was
present and requested that the petition be continued for sixty
days or referred back to the Planning Commission so that the
petitioners could present additional information.
The following citizens spoke on this rezoning.
1. Lydia Roberts, 5916 Viewpoint Avenue, Salem, spoke
in opposition because of the noise, air pollution, lower property
resale value and safety factors.
2. Stan Statzer, 5959 Viewpoint Avenue, was opposed
because of the potential noise and dust.
3. Harold Horn, West River Road, opposed because of
accidents caused by trucks doing U-turns.
4. Henry Davis, 5921 Dogwood Avenue, opposed because
of safety hazards.
5. Edward Aesy, 5767 Edgewood, opposed because of
noise, pollution, and lower property value.
6. Rosmond Phelps, 5744 Edgewood, opposed.
Mr. Crouse explained how he planned to address the
noise concerns of those speaking in opposition. He offered to
proffer the conditions of using only certain portions of the land
to diminish the noise. Supervisor Johnson pointed out that
conditions could not be proffered at this time.
'~ 8 v
January 24, 1989
Sec. 3. yPQrPd rights. Nothing in this ordinance shall be con-
strued to authorize the impairment of any vested right to an
existing general advertising sign and that those signs in use at
the effective date of this ordinance may be continued.
If any change in title or possession or renewal of a
lease of any sign or sign structure that is the subject of this
ordinance or any lot or parcel upon which a sign or sign struc-
ture is located occurs, then the use of that sign or sign struc-
ture may be continued. If any sign or sign structure is discon-
tinued for a period exceeding two years after the effective date
of this ordinance, then it shall conform to the provisions of
this ordinance .
The construction of a sign or sign structure for which
a permit was legally issued according to the provisions of the
Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance prior to the effective date of
this ordinance may proceed and continue; provided, that the con-
struction of said sign and sign structure is completed within
thirty (30) days after the effective date of this ordinance.
Any sign or sign structure which would otherwise be
prohibited by the provisions of this ordinance may not be ex-
tended or enlarged. Any sign or sign structure which is
destroyed or damaged in any manner to the extent of the cost of
restoration to its condition before the occurrence shall exceed
fifty (50) percent of the cost of reconstruction may not be
January 24, 1989
4
Chairman Garrett advised that Melvin T. Patrick who had
requested time to speak was not present.
IN RE: p,DJOURNMENT
Supervisor Robers moved to adjourn the meeting. The
motion was seconded by Supervisor McGraw and carried by a
unanimous voice vote.
Lee Garrett, Chairman
464
January 24, 1989
Planner Jon Hartley presented the staff report. The
petitioner has proffered certain conditions. The Planning
Commission unanimously recommended approval.
Supervisor Garrett moved to to approve the Use Not
Provided For Permit. The motion was seconded by Supervisor
Robers and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
..., FINAL ORDER
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDERED that the aforementioned
parcel of land which is contained in the Roanoke County Tax Maps
be issued a Use Not Provided for Permit for the purpose of
operating a dental laboratory.
BE IT FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this order be
transmitted to the Secretary of the Planning Commission and that
he be directed to reflect that change on the official zoning map
of Roanoke County.
PROFFER OF CONDITIONS
1. The number of employees will be limited to the
petitioner and one additional employee.
466
January 24,.1989
Don Wetherington, attorney for the petitioners, advised
that the petitioners believe that an office part is the best use
of the property. The proposed development would consist of not
more than 27,050 square feet and no more than five buildings.
Mr. Wetherington presented letters of support from citizens
surrounding the property.
The following citizens spoke concerning the petition.
1. David Courey, 3419 Ashemead, was opposed to a
change in the Land Use Plan, but was not opposed to the complex.
He also requested improvements to Colonial Avenue because of the
increased traffic.
2. Ruth Mosely, 3425 Greencliff, Roanoke, expressed
concern about the traffic on Colonial Avenue.
3, Mark Siler, 3471 Old Towne Road, was concerned
about the traffic on Colonial Avenue. He requested that Colonial
Avenue be placed on the Six Year Plan.
Supervisor Robers responded that he was willing to meet
with the Virginia Department of Transportation and Roanoke County
engineers to see what can be done to improve traffic conditions
on Colonial Avenue.
Supervisor Robers moved to amend the Land Use Plan
designation for the site to Transition. The motion was seconded
by Supervisor Johnson and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, Nickens, Garrett
46 ~
Januar
as Parcel 77.11-01-58 and recorded in Deed Book 1011 and legally
described below be redesignated from Development Land Use to
Transition Land Use.
BEGINNING at a point on the northerly side of Ogden Road (Virginia
Route 681) said point being the southwest corner of the Region
Properties, Inc. property;
THENCE with the north line of Ogden Road a curved line to the left,
whose radius is 597.96', whose chord bearing and distance are N
82°52'30" W, 61.02 feet, an arc of 61.05 feet.
THENCE continuing with the north line of Ogden Road the following
courses (see Virginia Sheet 3): N 85°48'00" W, 251.23 feet; N
85°00'00" W, 145.97 feet; N 80°39'47" W, 145.26 feet; N 72°03'25" W,
65.17 feet;
THENCE leaving ogden Road and with the eastern line of the James W.
and Peggy A. Wilson property N 33°52'15" E, 143.44 feet to a point on
the line of the Ogden Hills Subdivision property;
THENCE with the Ogden hills Subdivision property N 84°14'15" E, 697.17
feet to a point;
THENCE leaving the Ogden Hills Subdivision property and with the
western line of the Region Properties, Inc. property S 22°22'30" W,-
293.53 feet to the Point of BEGINNING, containing 3.20 acres.
1. Development of the land will be in substantial confor-
mity with the concept plan entitled "Ogden Road Office Park"
dated November 21, 1988 prepared by Balzer ~ Associates, Inc.,
a copy of which plan has been submitted with Petitioners' appli-
cation and petition.
~~o~
January 24, 1989
8. During the anticipated phased construction, areas of
the land that have been disturbed by cutting, grading or other
site preparation activity and on which construction of improve-
ments will be deferred until a later phase of development will
be reasonably restored to a presentable appearance by seeding
with grass or other appropriate groundcover.
9. Upon the request of the Director of Public Utilities
for Roanoke County within two years from the date as of which
the land is rezoned, Petitioners will grant Roanoke County a
sewer easement not to exceed twenty feet in width and situated
adjacent to the eastern boundary line of the land and extending
the entire depth of the land between the northern and southern
boundary lines. Installation of pipe and related appliances
within the easement will be at no expense to the Petitioners.
Any installation will be coordinated in such manner as will not
disrupt Petitioners' intended construction, and any improvements
that are damaged•or displaced during the initial construction
or subsequent maintenance or replacement activity will be re-
stored to their former condition~at no expense to Petitioners.
The easement will be otherwise in customary forr.~.
10. Freestanding light poles will be no higher than sixteen
feet, and the intensity of area lighting will not exceed one
foot candle on the ground beneath the lamp. Area lighting will
not incorporate metal-halide or halogen lamps.
January 24, 1989 ~ 7 2
adopting the $4~^^~° County Street an Off-
Street Desirnn Standards and S~~~fications.
Director of Development and Inspections Arnold Covey
reported that his department was assigned to develop a manual to
assist the public and development community in clarification of
rules, regulations and policies which apply to land development.
The water design standards component of the manual has been
adopted and the second component, Street and Parking Design
Standards and Specifications is now ready for adoption. Mr.
Covey advised that the standards address areas such as pavement
design, curb and gutter, street connections, parking and loading
requirements. The Planning Commission made several
recommendations at their meeting on January 3, 1989 and
recommended approval following these changes.
Mr. Covey addressed several questions the board members
had on clarification of the proposed standards.
The f ollowing people spoke concerning the proposed
standards
1. Ron Boothe, President of the Roanoke Valley
Homebuilders Association, advised that the organization was
opposed to the standard that requiring curb and guttering be
installed and black top paving be used in all subdivisions that
falls within the Urban Economic Boundary of the 2005 plan. He
advised that homebuilders would pass this additional cost on to
January 24, 1989 ~ 7 4
There was no discussion and no one spoke to this
ordinance.
Supervisor Nickens moved to approve first reading of
the ordinance. The motion was seconded by Supervisor McGraw and
carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
~yS; None
IN RE; FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES
1 Ordinance amending and reenacting _Chavter 16 of
he Roanoke Countv Code, Precious Metals a_nd Gems.
County Attorney Paul Mahoney advised that this
ordinance updates the county code and brings it into compliance
with the state code and closes certain loop holes that the
Sheriff's Department has discovered.
Supervisor Nickens asked if there was a fee to cover
the permit renewal and requested that this be included in the
second reading.
Supervisor Johnson moved to approve first reading of
the ordinance. The motion was seconded by Supervisor McGraw and
carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
~~s
January 24, 1989
2. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of
the Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading concerning the
sale and disposition of the hereinafter described property was
held on January 10, 1989; a second reading was held on Jan-
uary 24, 1989; and
3. That this property is an abandoned pumping and
valve station located on property owned or formerly owned by the
Hunting Hills Land Corporation near the intersection of Hunting
Hills Drive and Starkey Drive; and
- 4. That the offer of the Virginia Department of High-
ways in the amount of $1,634.00 is hereby accepted and all other
offers are rejected; and
5. That all proceeds from the sale of this property
are to be allocated to the capital reserves of the County; and
6. That the County Administrator is authorized to exe-
cute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke
County as are necessary to accomplish the conveyance of said pro-
perty, all of which shall be upon form approved by the County
Attorney.
On motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by Supervisor
Robers and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, McGraw, Robers, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
478
January 24, 1989
Supervisor Johnson moved to adopt the ordinance. The
motion was seconded by Supervisor McGraw and carried by the
following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAyS: None
ORDINANCE 12489-5 AMENDING AND REENACTING
THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE TO PROVIDE FOR A
PROHIBITION UPON THE LOCATION OF CERTAIN
TYPES OF SIGNS
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia, recognizes that "general advertising" signs (bill-
boards) are becoming a blight upon the County, and that this is
the functional equivalent of a public nuisance, adversely affect-
ing the appearance of the community, aesthetics, vitality, the
enhancement of property values, as well as the value of the
County's commercial and residential areas, and that such signs
constitute a traffic hazard adversely affecting the traffic safe-
ty in the County; and
WHEREAS, Section 15.1-510 of the 1950 Code of Virginia,
as amended, authorizes any county to adopt such measures as it
may deem expedient to secure and promote the health, safety, and
general welfare of the inhabitants of the county, and further
that the provisions of Chapter 18 of Title 15.1 (Section 15.1-837
et seq.), and that Section 2.01 of the Roanoke County Charter
~8
January 24, 1989
Sec. 3. Vested rivhts. Nothing in this ordinance shall be con-
strued to authorize the impairment of any vested right to an
existing general advertising sign and that those signs in use at
the effective date of this ordinance may be continued.
If any change in title or possession or renewal of a
lease of any sign or sign structure that is the subject of this
ordinance or any lot or parcel upon which a sign or sign struc-
ture is located occurs, then the use of that sign or sign struc-
ture may be continued. If any sign or sign structure is discon-
tinued for a period exceeding two years after the effective date
of this ordinance, then it shall conform to the provisions of
this ordinance.
The construction of a sign or sign structure for which
a permit was legally issued according to the provisions of the
Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance prior to the effective date of
this ordinance may proceed and continue; provided, that the con-
struction of said sign and sign structure is completed within
thirty (30) days after the effective date of this ordinance.
Any sign or sign structure which would otherwise be
prohibited by the provisions of this ordinance may not be ex-
tended or enlarged. Any sign or sign structure which is
destroyed or damaged in any manner to the extent of the cost of
restoration to its condition before the occurrence shall exceed
fifty (50) percent of the cost of reconstruction may not be
January 24, 1989
4
Chairman Garrett advised that Melvin T. Patrick who had
requested time to speak was not present.
ZN RE: ADJOURNMENT
Supervisor Robers moved to adjourn the meeting. The
motion was seconded by Supervisor McGraw and carried by a
unanimous voice vote.
Lee Garrett, Chairman
February 14, 1989 ~ 8
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
Roanoke County Administration Center
3738 Brambleton Avenue, SW
Roanoke, Virginia 24018
February 14, 1989
The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, met~this day at the Roanoke County
Administration Center, this being the second Tuesday, and the
first regularly scheduled meeting of the month of February, 1989.
IN RE: CALL TO ORDER
Chairman Garrett called the meeting to order at 3:04
p.m. The roll call was taken.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Lee Garrett, Vice Chairman Richard
Robers, Supervisors Bob L. Johnson, Steven
A. McGraw, Harry C. Nickens
MEMBERS ABSENT: None
STAFF PRESENT: Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator; John
M. Chambliss, Assistant County
Administrator for Human Services; John R.
Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator of
Community Services and Development; Don M.
Myers, Assistant County Administrator for
Management Services; Paul M. Mahoney,
4e5
February 14, 1989
written comprehensive history of Roanoke County should be one of
its most important projects and commissioned Deedie Kagey to
handle this responsibility; and
WHEREAS, Mrs. Kagey, Assistant Principal at Penn Forest
Elementary School, spent over two years of intense research
including over 90 interviews and visits to libraries, colleges,
universities and historical resources centers throughout the
Commonwealth of Virginia; and
WHEREAS, the culmination of her efforts is When Past is
prnloaue A Historv of Roanoke County, an 800 page book which
focuses on home and community life, public service, government,
industrial development and agriculture; and
WHEREAS, this book will serve to instill in present and
future generation of Roanoke County citizens an appreciation of
our heritage, a pride in our ancestors, and a record of events in
our history that will last far beyond our sesquicentennial year.
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of
Roanoke County, Virginia, wishes to express its deepest
appreciation and the appreciation of its citizens to Deedie Kagey
for her willingness to assume this awesome responsibility, her
dedication to this project, and the successful results of her
efforts; and
48 7
February 14, 1989
Administration offered to sell the 5515,000 loan at a discount of
50 cents on the dollar if the loan is paid off prior to May 9.
Staff is recommending that the County purchase the water system
for the discount loan balance of 5257,550 with funds available
from the 1988 Virginia Resources Authority water revenue bond
sale.
Supervisor Johnson moved to approve the staff
recommendation The motion was seconded by Supervisor Robers
and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
2 Request of schools for auuropriation of additional
monies from th school Federal Programs Funds.
A-21489-3
Dr. Powell from Roanoke County schools presented the
report, requesting an additional appropriation of $84,581. The
money has already been allocated, but the figures were
underestimated in the budget preparation and more funds were
received.
In response to a question from Supervisor Johnson, Dr.
Powell advised that the program could not be expanded nor other
monies freed because the allocation must be spent on activities
48 9
February 14, 1989
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
4 Adoption of Financial Improvement Plan
A-21489-5
Finance Director Diane Hyatt reported that the County
now has a reserve set aside for contingency at 3~ and have a AA
bond rating with Moodys and Standard and Poors. Staff would like
to recommend a formal policy to reduce or eliminate short-term
borrowing and to improve the bond rating to AA+ or AAA.
Ms. Hyatt explained that the County has found it
necessary to borrow in anticipation of tax revenues because of
changes in federal tax laws, and the fact that revenue
collections do not correspond with expenditures. She presented
suggestions that should be considered as a means of reducing
short-term borrowing and suggestions to improve bond ratings.
The Board members questioned several aspects of the
staff suggestions and Supervisor Johnson asked that the term
"policy" not be used but instead should be a goal statement.
Supervisor McGraw suggested using the word plan instead of policy.
Supervisor Nickens moved to approve the staff
recommendation with the suggestions outlined in the report and
February 14, 1989
Director of Utilities Clifford Craig agrees with the proposed
settlement.
Supervisor Nickens moved to authorize the County
Administrator to execute an agreement with John Hall and that the
payment of $500 be accepted as settlement of the outstanding
utility bill. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Robers and
carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Supervisor McGraw
Review of Utility Deposit Policv.
A-21489-7
Finance Director Diane Hyatt reported that the water
ordinance was amended in October 1987 to establish security
deposits. The County currently has $175,000 in security
deposits, of which $23,375 has been collected in reconnection
deposits. Delinquent accounts have decreased 5-1/2~ over the
last year. A comparison of utility service procedures in Roanoke
County, Roanoke City and Salem was available for board review.
In 1987, there were $90,000 in delinquent accounts, and in 1988,
there were $85,000. Staff recommends that the water ordinance
not be amended and remain as it is.
February 14, 1989
IN RE: REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS
Supervisor Garrett requested a public hearing with the
Virginia Department of Transportation to be set for March 28,
1989 on the connecting road between Virginia Tech and the Roanoke
Valley.
IN RE: SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES
1 Ordinance amending the Roanoke Countv Subdivision
rdinance and Zoning Ordinance by adopting the Roanoke Countv
Street and Off Street Design Standards and Specifz~ations.
Mr. Mahoney reported that this ordinance and resolution
deals with only one section of the Design Standards and
Specifications Manual. The Board will vote on both the ordinance
amendment and a resolution adopting the portion of the manual.
Director of Development and Inspections Arnold Covey
reported that they had not met again with the Homebuilders
Association.
Supervisor Nickens moved to approve the ordinance. The
motion was seconded by Supervisor McGraw and carried by the
following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
49 5
February 14, 1989
1. That Chapter 17, Sl~hdivisions, of the Roanoke
County Code be, and it hereby is, amended and reenacted by amend-
ing Sections 17-3 and 17-19 to read and provide as follows:
Sen 17 3 Desicrn rern~irements aeneral~.
(A) The owner or the proprietor of a subdivision shall
observe and comply with the following general requirements and
principles of land subdivision in preparing the preliminary and
final subdivision plats:
(22) - All streets shall conform to the duly adopted
*andards relatin the street design and construction,
lished in the Desictn and Construction Standards Manual.
Sec 17 19 Streets and roads Qenerall~.
The following improvements shall be required in
subdivisions lying in whole or in part within the County which
include or involve any public street or any right-of-way
connecting two public streets or any easements for the foregoing:
~B~- -Streets- s1~8~~- be- gr8ded- te- tl~e- Nidtl~- speerfted
bp- tl~e- ~dtrgiflre- BepBrtmeflb- af- TrBflspert8ttefl; - 8- niYfl~ltltiRt- aidtl~- of
tl~irtp- ~36~- feeb,-- 8fld- gr8ded- to- eress- seetiafls- 8fld- praf4le
8pprebed-bp-tl~e-8geflt-
February 14, 1989 ~ 9 7
implement the provisions of the subdivision ordinance and zoning
ordinance.
(B) Nothing contained herein shall prevent the Board
from considering and adopting amendments to such manual at env
~,ime it is deemed appropriate
2. Chapter 21, Zoning, of the Roanoke County Code be,
and hereby is, amended and reenacted by amending Section 21-91 to
read and provide as follows:
Sec 21 91 Off Street Parking and Loading.
A. There shall be provided at the time of .erection of
any main building, or at the time any main building is enlarged,
minimum off-street parking speee- with- eelegnate- previsions- for
entrance-end-exit-bp-standard-sized-entemebi~es;-as-followsc
and off street loading requirements shall conform t~ the duly
tad standards established in the Design and Construction Stan-
dards Manual.
fe}- - fn- ei~- residenttei- distriets- there- sheii- be- pro-
vided- efle- antomobiie- perking- speee- for- eeeh- singie-femrip- unit
and- eeeh- dweiiing- unit- in- a- twe-€emiip- dwe}}iRg,-- - the- ree~ired
parking- sheii- be- provided- en- the- same- }et- es-the- dweiitng- unit .-
For- aii- mttiti-famiip- dwe}}tngs,-- tnelndsng- high-rise- apartments
and- high-rase- condeminit~ms; - there- sheii- be- provided- one- end- one-
third-perking-speees-fer-eeeh-dwe~~ing-unit=
49 9
February 14, 1989
__________{f}- -For-hespita~s-and-nursing-heroes; -nt-~enst-ene-park-
ing- space- for- each- tWe- beds- eapaeitp; - ine}siding- infants- cribs
and-chi}drents-beds.-
----------fig}- -For- medical- and- dental- eirnses;- at-least- ten- park-
ing- spaces-- -~Phree- additienai- parking- spaces- shall- be- furnished
fer- each- deeter- or- dentist- having- effiees- in- such- clinic- in
excess-ef-three-daeters-er-dentists-
_________-~h}--Fer-teurist- eeurts;- metes;- apartments- and- apart-
meat- maters;- at-least- ane-perking-space-fer-each-individue~- sleep-
ing- or- living- unit •-- -For- hotels- and- apartment- heteis; - at- least
ene- parking- space-fer- each- twa-sleeping- reams; - up- te- and- ineind-
ing- the- first- twentp- seeping- reams,-- and- ene- parking- space- fer
each-three-s}eeping-reams-aver-tWentp-
----------~i}- -Fer-mertuaries- and- }iquer- stares;- at- least- thirtp
parking-spaees-
__------_-~~}- -Fer- retail- stares- seising- direet~y- to- the- pubic;
ene- parking- space- far- each- tNe- hundred- square-feet- ef- retail
fieer-space-in-the-bniiding-
----------~k}- -Parking- space- as- required- in- the- feregaing- sha}i
be- en-the- same- let-r~ith-the- main-butidtng.-- - fin-the-ease- ef-btsiid-
tugs- ether- than- dwe~iings; - space- map- be- ieeated- Kithira- six- hun-
dyed-feet-
----------~}}- - Everp- peree~- af- hand- hereafter- used- as- e- pub~ie
parking- area- sha~~- be- surfaced- r+ith- crushed- reek; - grave; - asphe~t
501
February 14, 1989
______--__{e}- -Spaee- aha~~- be-provided-for-the-bonding-end-nn~oed-
ing- ef- trtseks- end- eertuneretei- ~rehieies- sorbing- mn}ti-femiip; - eam-
mereiei-and-indnstriei-bni}dinga-
3. That these amendments, additions, and reenactments
shall be in full f orce and effect from and after February 15,
1989, and that this effective date for the Design and
Construction Standards Manual shall apply to development plans
which have not been accepted for review by the Department of
Development and Inspections prior to February 1, 1989; provided
said plans in the review process receive final approval by the
County within sixty (60) days of February 15, 1989.
On motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by Supervisor
McGraw and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, McGraw, Nickens, Robers, Garrett
NAYS: None
RESOLUTION 21 - ADOPTING A MANUAL OF
REGULATIONS AND POLICIES ENTITLED "DESIGN
AND- CONSTRUCTION MANUAL" TO ASSIST THE
PUBLIC IN THE CLARIFICATION AND
INTERPRETATION OF RULES, REGULATIONS, AND
POLICIES APPLICABLE TO LAND DEVELOPMENT
IN ROANOKE COUNTY
WHEREAS, the Department of Development is in the pro-
cess of preparing a manual to assist the public, and especially
the development community, for clarification of rules, regula-
503
February 14, 1989
accepted for review by the Department of Development and Inspec-
tions prior to February 1, 1989; provided said plans in the re-
view process receive final approval by the County within sixty
(60) days of February 15, 1989. Nothing contained herein shall
prevent the Board from considering and adopting amendments to
such manual at any time it is deemed appropriate.
On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor
Nickens and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, McGraw, Nickens, Robers, Garrett
NAYS: None
2 Ordinance vacatincL a portion of the previously
platted subdivision referred to as Thomas H Beasle r r on
the south side of Va Secondary Route 679 (Buck Mountain Road in
~,he Cave Spring Magisterial District.
Mr. Mahoney presented the staff report.
Supervisor Nickens moved to approve the ordinance. The
motion was seconded by Supervisor Robers and carried by the
following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
505
February 14, 1989
2. That upon vacation of Lote 1 through 11, inclusive,
and the 50 foot road, all located on the south Bide of Virginia
Secondary Route No. 679 as recorded in Plat Book 3, page 61 in
the aforesaid Clerk's Office, title to same shall be vested in
Fralin ~ Waldron Inc.
3. That this ordinance shall be in full force and
effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances
or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this
ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed.
4. That Fralin ~ Waldron Inc. shall record a certified
copy of this ordinance with the Clerk of the Circuit Court, and
shall pay all fees required to accomplish this transaction.
3. Ordinance amending and reenactincr Chanter 16 of
the Roanoke County Code. Precious Metals and Gems
Mr. Mahoney reported that at the first reading, staff
recommended an annual renewal fee. The current requirement is a
$200 fee and is retained in the ordinance.
Supervisor Nickens moved to approve the ordinance. The
motion was seconded by Supervisor McGraw and carried by the
following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
ORDINANCE 21489-11 AMENDING AND
REENACTING CHAPTER 16 OF THE ROANOKE
COUNTY CODE, PRECIOUS METALS AND GEMS
WHEREAS, by Ordinance 3099, adopted on Tuesday, April
February 14, 1989
5 0 7 ~.
"Dealer" means any person, firm, ~artnershi~or
~orooration engaged in the business of purchasing secondhand
precious metals or gems, removing in any manner precious metals
or gems from manufactured articles not then owned by such person,
firm. .partnership, or corporation buying, acquiring, or selling
precious metals or gems removed from such manufactured articles.
"Dealer" shall mean any employer or principal on whose behalf a
purchase is made and any employee or agent who makes any such
purchase f or or on behalf of his employer or principal. This
definition shall not be construed so as to include persons en-
gaged in the following:
(1) Purchases of precious metals or gems directly from
other dealers, manufacturers or wholesalers for
retail or wholesale inventories, provided the sell-
ing dealer has complied with the provisions of
this chapter.
(2) Purchases of precious metals or gems from a duly
qualified fiduciary who is disposing of the assets
of the estate being administered by such fiduciary
in the administration of an estate.
(3) Acceptance by a retail merchant of trade-in mer-
chandise previously sold by such retail merchant
to the person presenting that merchandise for
trade-in.
(4) Repairing, restoring, or designing jewelry by a
retail merchant, if such activities are within his
normal course of business.
(5) Purchases of precious metals or gems by industrial
refiners and manufacturers, insofar as such pur-
chases are made directly from retail merchants,
wholesalers, or dealers or by mail originating
outside the Commonwealth of Virginia.
(6) Persons regularly engaged in the business of pur-
chasing and processing nonprecious scrap metals
which incidentally may contain traces of precious
metals recoverable as a by-product.
"Gems" means precious or semiprecious stones
customarily used in jewelry whether loose or in a setting.
February 14, 1989
~o ~
.S~l A statement of ownership from the ser er.
(b) The information required by anbaeettert-fa}
bdivisions 1 through 3 of subsection (a) above shall appear on
each bill of sale for all precious metals and gems purchased by a
dealer and a copy shall be mailed or delivered, within twenty-
four (24) hours of the time of purchase, to the sheriff.
Sec. 16-30. Prohibited purchases.
(a) No dealer shall purchase precious metals or gems
from any person who is under the age of eighteen (18) years.
(b) No dealer shall purchase precious metals or gems
from any person who the dealer believes, or has reason to be-
lieve, is not the owner of such items, unless such person has
written and duly authenticated authorization from the owner per-
mitting and directing such sale.
( ) No dealer shall purchase or sell anv precious
metals or gems except at the place of business as identified_in
the application recruired by Section 16-42.
DIVISION 2. PERMIT
Sec. 16-41. Required; postincr.
No person shall engage in the activities of a dealer in
the county ~s defined by Section 16.21, unless he has a current
permit so to do issued by the sheriff pursuant to this division.
No purchase or sale permitted by this chapter shall be lawful
unless and until such permit is prominently posted at the
dealer's place of business.
Sec. 16-42. Application fee.
Any person desiring a permit required by this division
shall file with the sheriff an application form, which shall in-
clude the dealer's full name and any aliases and his address,
~at-P of birth, age, ~^^ial security number, sex, and finger-
prints; the name, address, and telephone number of the appli-
cant's employer, if any; and the location of the applicant's
place of business. Such application shall be accompanied by an
February 14, 1989
511
unconstitutional or invalid by the valid judgment or decree of a
court of co~petent jurisdiction, the remaining ohrases, clauses,
sentences, paracrraphs, and sections of this chapter shall remain
v li
3. That these amendments, additions, and reenactments
shall be in full force and effect on and after.
On motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by Supervisor
McGraw and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, McGraw, Nickens, Robers, Garrett
NAYS: None
IN RE: APPOINTMENTS
1 Court Service Unit Advisory Council/Youth and
Family Services Advisory Board.
Supervisor Johnson nominated Gary Minter to serve a
two-year term representing the Hollins Magisterial District. His
term will expire March 22, 1990.
IN RE: REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS
Supervisor Johnson announced that the Regional Airport
Commission budget will be presented to the Board of Supervisors.
Supervisor Robers advised that there will be a meeting
on March 2, 1989 with citizens on Colonial Avenue to express
concerns about the road. He also reported that plans are
February 14, 1989 ~ ~ 3
2. Acknowledgment from Va. Department of
Transportation that the following roads have been
accepted into the Secondary System:
a. 0.17 miles of Highfields Farm Drive
b. 0.17 miles of Red Barn Lane
c. 0.10 miles of Fort Lewis Circle
d. 0.11 miles of Ranchcrest Drive
e. 0.21 miles of Snow Owl Drive
f. 0.14 miles of Golden Eagle Lane
g. 0.16 miles of Green Ridge Court
3. Resolution of Support for a feasibility study of
a traditional music center to be located at Rocky
Knob.
4. Request for a Raffle Permit from the Botetourt
Jaycees.
5. Acceptance of a sanitary sewer easement being
donated by Timberline Condominium Associates.
6. Acceptance of a sanitary sewer easement being
donated by Clyties W. St. Clair.
2. That t he Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized
and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said
items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to
this resolution.
On motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by Supervisor
Johnson and upon the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
RESOLUTION 21489-12.c NDORSING THAT A
STUDY BE CONDUCTED TO DETERMINE THE
FEASIBILITY OF A TRADITIONAL MUSIC CENTER
LOCATED ON THE ROCKY KNOB SITE
515
February 14, 1989
IN RE: REPORTS
Supervisor Nickens moved to receive and file the
following reports. The motion was seconded by Supervisor McGraw
and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
1. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance
2. General Fund Unappropriated Balance
3. Board Contingency Fund
4. Statement of Treasurer's Accountability
IN RE: PUBLIC HEARING
289-1 Public Hearing for citizen comment and
resolution authorizing the issuance of not to
exceed $17 million short-term notes for the
purpose of meeting casual deficits in the
revenue of the County in anticipation of the
collection of taxes and other revenue.
Ms. Hyatt reported that this action will allow the
Treasurer to borrow up to $17 million short-term notes.
Currently only $9 million dollars is necessary to borrow. The
bids will be brought to the Board for approval on February 28,
1989. Additional borrowing up to the $17 million will be brought
February 14, 1989
517
WHEREAS, such borrowing is for the purpose of meeting
casual deficits in the revenues of the County for the current
calendar year, in anticipation of the collection of the taxes and
revenues for the current calendar year;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF
SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA:
1. The Board approves the contracting of a debt and
issuance and sale of the County's revenue anticipation notes (the
"Notes") in an aggregate principal amount of not to exceed
$17,000,000 pursuant to the authorization granted in
Section 15.1-545 of the Code. Outstanding Notes may be paid by
the County and new Notes issued from time to time in accordance
with this Resolution so long as the outstanding aggregate
principal amount of Notes at any time during the current calendar
year not exceed $17,000,000. Further, the outstanding aggregate
principal amount of Notes issued pursuant to this Resolution
shall not exceed the limitations contained in Section 15.1-545 of
the Code. Within such limitation, the County Administrator is
authorized to approve the final amount of the borrowing, such
approval to be evidenced by his execution and delivery of the
Notes. The issuance and sale of the Notes are hereby authorized.
2. The Notes shall be issued in such form and upon
such terms as may be approved by subsequent resolution of the
Board.
5f 9
February 14, 1989
_;
will be invested and expended as set forth in the County's
Non-Arbitrage Certificate. and Tax Covenants, to be delivered
simultaneously with the issuance and delivery of the Notes and
that the County shall comply with the other covenants and
representations contained therein.
6. The officers and agents of the County are hereby
authorized and directed to prepare, execute and deliver an
appropriate official statement, notice of sale or such other
disclosure documents as may be necessary to expedite the sale of
the Notes. The official statement, notice of sale or other
disclosure documents shall be published in such publications and
distributed in such manner and at such times as the appropriate
officers or agents of the County shall determine.
7. The officers and agents of the County are
authorized and directed to take such further action a's may be
necessary or convenient in connection with the issuance, sale and
delivery of the Notes and all actions previously taken by such
officers and agents in connection therewith are ratified and
confirmed.
8. The appropriate officers and agents of the County
are authorized and directed to immediately cause a certified copy
of this Resolution to be filed with the Circuit Court of Roanoke
County pursuant to Sections 15.1-199 and 15.1-212 of the Code of
Virginia of 1950, as amended.
February 14, 1989
521
Following several questions from the board members, Mr.
Hodge reported the staff will continue to update revenues to
bring to the board in subsequent work sessions.
2. Landfill Siting
Mr. Hodge reported that the County Administrator of
Bedford County has stated that they are interested in working
with Roanoke City in a joint landfill.
Mr. Hodge presented a copy of the siting evaluation
form that will be used to finalize the rankings of the sites.
The ranking will be brought to the Board at the February 28th
meeting.
Chairman Garrett advised that he had just received a
letter from Roanoke City Mayor Taylor concerning the search for a
landfill in Bedford County. Mayor Taylor's letter states that
the City remains 100$ behind the joint effort with Roanoke County
in a search for a landfill.
Landfill Consultant John Olver of Olver Associates
presented the background of the process including the matrix used
to judge the sites. He reported that the Planning Staff and
Landfill Citizens Advisory Committee had input into developing
the evaluation form. He explained that all testing has been done
and economic studies have been completed. Mr. Hodge pointed out
that the matrix was changed to give more weight to the impact of
a landfill to people.
February 14, 1989 ~ ~ 3
became public. He also presented a position paper outlining
their reasons why the site should be rejected.
Supervisor Nickens pointed out that all the proposed
sites have some of the same problems as Red Hill and the
property owners also did not find out until shortly before it
became public.
2. Kelly Whitney, Clean Valley Council, spoke
requesting expansion of the recycling program and inclusion of
the necessary funding in the budget.
Supervisor McGraw asked Ms. Whitney to work on this
issue at the state level.
3. Craig Gould, 6433 Crowell Gap Road, also spoke in
opposition to the proposed Red Hill site and asked why Roanoke
County could not work with Bedford County on a landfill site in
that area.
Supervisor Johnson pointed out that Roanoke County has
not been contacted about joining with Bedford County and that
Roanoke County has discussed a regional landfill with all
surrounding localities.
IN RE: WORK SESSIONS (CONTINUED)
3. Recycling
February 14, 1989
525
NAYS: None
IN RE: ADJOURNMENT
Supervisor McGraw moved to adjourn the meeting since
there was no need for an executive session. The motion was
seconded by Supervisor Nickens and carried by a unanimous voice
vote.
ACTION N0.
A-102489-6.a
ITEM NUMBER
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: October 24, 1989
AGENDA ITEM: Request for approval of a Raffle Permit from the
William Byrd High School Cheerleader Booster Club.
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The William Byrd High School Cheerleader Booster Club has
requested a Raffle Permit to be held on November 3, 1989.This
application has been reviewed by the Commissioner of Revenue and
he recommends that it be approved.
The organization has paid the $25.00 fee.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the application for a Raffle Permit be
approved.
SUBMITTED BY:
Mary H. Allen
Clerk to the Board
APPROVED BY:
.I
~~~ ~
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
ACTION VOTE
Apzroved (X) Motion by: RRh r. Jnhn~.nn/ Yes No Abs
Denied ( ) Steven A. McGraw Garrett x
Received ( ) Johnson x
Referred McGraw x
To• Nickens x
Robers x
cc: File
Bingo/Raffle File
.~ . .
,,"~
COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA
COMMISSIONER OF THE REVENUE
APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO CONDUCT RAFFLES OR BINGO
Application is hereby made for a bingo game or raffle permit.
This application is made subject to all County and State laws,
ordinances, rules, and regulations now in force, or that may be
enacted hereafter and which are hereby agreed to by the under-
signed applicant and which shall be deemed a condition under
which this permit is issued.
All applicants should exercise extreme care to ensure the accura-
cy of their responses to the following questions. Bingo games
and raffles are strictly regulated by Title 18.2-340.1 et. seg.
of the criminal statutes of the Virginia Code, and by Section
4-96 et. seg, of the Roanoke County Code. These laws authorize
the County Board of Supervisors to conduct a reasonable~investiga-
tion prior to granting a bingo or raffle permit. The Board has
sixty days from the filing of an application to grant or deny the
permit. The Board may deny, suspend, or revoke the permit of any
organization found not to be in strict compliance with county and
state law. '
Any person violating county or state regulations concerning these
permits shall be guilty of a Class 1 misdemeanor. Any person who
uses any part of the gross receipts from bingo or raffles for any
purpose other than the lawful religious, charitable, community,
or educational purposes for which the organization is specifi-
cally organized, except for reasonable operating expenses, shall
be guilty of a Class 6 felony.
THIS APPLICATION IS FOR: (check one)
RAFFLE PERMIT x
BINGO GAMES
Name of Organization William Byrd High School Cheerleader Booster Club
Street Address NA
Mailing Address NA
City, State, Zip Code NA
Purpose and Type of Organization To financially support the WBHS cheerleaders
since there is essentially no funds in the Roanoke County/WBHS budget for this
program.
When was the organization founded? --
1
~..".
Roanoke County meeting place? William Byrd High School
Has organization been in existence in Roanoke County for two con-
tinuous years? YES x NO
Is the organization non-profit? YES x NO
Indicate Federal Identification Number # NA
Attach copy of IRS Tax Exemption letter. NA
Officers of the Organization:
CO-Presidents Betty Ellis Vice-President Patti Gabris
Address : 1478 Abbey Circle Address ; 1839 Pembrook Drive
Vinton, VA 24179
Secretary: Joyce Moorman
Treasurer:
Address: 4350 Denbeigh Circle
Vinton, VA 24179
Vinton, VA 24179
CO-PRESIDENT:
T~-eas~r~r : Pat Belue
Address: 529 Olney Road
Vinton, VA 24179
Member authorized to be resoonsible for Raffle or Bingo opera-
tions:
Name Betty Ellis
Home Address 1478 Abbey Circle, Vinton, VA 24179
Phone 890-3125 Bus. Phone 985-5000 Ext. 5422
A COMPLETE LIST OF THE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF CURRENT MEMBER-
SHIP MUST BE FURNISHED WITH THIS APPLICATION.
Specific location where Raffle or Bingo Game is to be conducted.
William Byrd High School Football Stadium
RAFFLES: Date of Drawing 11/3/89
Time of Drawing Approx. 9:00 p.m.
BINGO: Days of Week & Hours of Activity:
Sunday
Monday
Tuesday
Wednesday
Thursday
Friday
Saturday
From To
From To
From To
From To
From To
From To
From To
2
~~
State specifically how the proceeds from the Bingo/Raffle will be
used. List in detail the planned or intended use of the proceeds.
Use estimates amounts if necessary.
To enhance the education of our youth by offering them the opportunity
to grow in social intelligence and leadership. The proceeds will be
used to contribute to worthwhile projects at William Byrd High School.
3
L-
BINGO: Complete the following:
Legal owner(s) of the building where BINGO is to be conducted:
Name:
Address:
County
State Zip
Is the building owned by a 501-C non-profit organization?
Seating capacity for each location:
Parking spaces for each location:
ALL RAFFLE AND BINGO APPLICANTS MUST ANSWER QUESTIONS 1 - 19
1. Gross receipts from all sources related to the operation of
Bingo games or Instant Bingo by calendar quarter for prior calen-
dar year period.
BINGO INSTANT BINGO
NA
1st Quarter
2nd Quarter
3rd Quarter
4th Quarter
Total
1st Quarter
2nd Quarter
3rd Quarter
4th Quarter
Total
2. Does your organization understand that it is a violation of
law to enter into a contract with any person or firm, associa-
tion, organization, partnership, or corporation of any classifica-
tion whatsoever, for the purpose of organizing, managing, or con-
ducting Bingo Games or Raffles? Yes
3. Does your organization understand that it must maintain and
file complete records of receipts and disbursements pertaining to
Bingo games and Raffles, and that such records are subject to
audit by the Commissioner of the Revenue? Yes
4. Does your organization understand that the Commissioner of
the Revenue or his designee has the right to go upon the premises
on which any organization is conducting a Bingo game or raffle,
to perform unannounced audits, and to secure for audit all re-
cords required to be maintained for Bingo games or raffles?
Yes
4
5. Does your organization understand that a Financial Report
must be filed with the Commissioner of the Revenue on or before
the first day of November of each calendar year for which a per-
mit has been issued? Yes
6. Does your organization understand that if gross receipts ex-
ceed fifty thousand dollars during any calendar quarter, an addi-
tional Financial Report must be filed for such quarter no later
than sixty days following the last day of such quarter? NA
7. Does your organization understand that the failure to file
financial reports when due shall cause automatic revocation of
the permit, and no such organization shall conduct any Bingo game
or raffle thereafter until such report is properly filed and a
new permit is obtained? Yes
8. Does your organization understand that each Financial Report
must be accompanied by a Certificate, verified under oath by the
Board of Directors, that the ,proceeds of any Bingo game or raffle
have been used for these lawful, religious, charitable, commu-
nity, or educational purposes for which the organization is spe-
cifically chartered or organized, and that the operation of Bingo
games or raffles have been in accordance with the provisions of
Article 1.1 of Chapter 8, Title 18.2 of the Code of Virginia? Yes
9. Does your organization understand that a one percent audit
fee of the gross receipts must be paid to the County of Roanoke
upon submission of the annual financial report due on or before
the first of November? Yes
10. Does your organization understand that this permit is valid
only in the County of Roanoke and only at such locations, and for
such dates, as are designated in the permit application? Yes
11. Does your organization understand that no person, except a
bona fide member of any such organization who shall have been a
member of such organization for at least ninety days prior to
such participation, shall participate in the management, opera-
tion, or conduct of any bingo game or raffle, and no person
shall receive any remuneration for participating in management,
operation, or conduct of any such game or raffle? Yes
12. Has your organization attached a check for the annual permit
fee in the amount of $25.00 payable to the County of Roanoke,
Virginia? Yes
13. Does your organization understand that any organization found
in violation of the County Bingo and Raffle Ordinance or §18.2-
340.10 of the Code of Virginia authorizing this permit is subject
to having such permit revoked and any person, shareholder, agent,
member or employee of such organization who violates the above to
having such permit revoked and any person, shareholder, agent,
member or employee of such organization who violates the above
referenced Codes may be guilty of a felony? Yes
5
~~
14. Has your organization attached a complete list of its member-
ship to this application form? Yes
15. Has your organization attached a copy of its bylaws to this
application form? Yes
16. Has the organization been declared exempt from property taxa-
tion under the Virginia Constitution or statutes? NA
If yes, state whether exemption is for real, personal property,
or both and identify exempt property. NA
17. State the specific type and purpose of the organization.
Booster Club to inancia y support t e eer ea ers.
18. Is this organization incorporated in Virginia?
If yes, name and address of Registered Agent:
NA
NA
19. Is the organization registered with the Virginia Department
of Agriculture and Consumer Affairs pursuant to the Charitable
Solicitations Act, Section 57-48 of the Virginia Code? NA
(If so, attach copy of registration.)
Has the organization been granted an exemption from registration
by the Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Affairs?
NA (If so, attach copy of exemption.)
ALL RAFFLE APPLICANTS DESCRIBE THE ARTICLES TO BE RAFFLED,
VALUE OF SUCH ARTICLES, AND PROCEED TO NOTARIZATION.
Article Description
CD Player
3-Month Single Membership to
Lancerlot Sports Complex
Portable Serving Cart
$100 Gas
$20 Gift Certificate to Charcoal
Steak House
Fair Market Value
$ 175.00
120.00
150.00
100.00
20.00
6
~. "` *~
ALL BINGO APPLICANTS MUST ANSWER QUESTIONS 20 - 27 BEFORE
NOTARIZATION
RAFFLE APPLICANTS, GO TO NOTARIZATION.
20. Does your organization understand that the bingo games shall
not be conducted more frequently than two calendar days in any
calendar week?
21. Does your organization understand that it is required to keep
complete records of the bingo game. These records based on §18.2-
340.6 of the Code of Virginia and §4.98 of Roanoke County Code
must include the following:
a. A record of the date, quantity, and card value of instant
bingo supplies purchased, as well as the name and address of
the supplier of such instant bingo supplies, and written
invoice or receipt is also required for each purchase of in-
stant bingo supplies?
b. A record in writing of the dates on which Bingo is played,
the number of people in attendance on each date, and the
amount of receipts and prizes on each day?
(These records must be retained for three years.)
c. A record of the name and address of each individual to whom a
door prize, regular or special Bingo game prize or jackpot
from the playing of Bingo is awarded?
d. A complete and itemized record of all receipts and disburse-
ments which support, and that agree with, the quarterly and
annual reports required to be filed, and that these records
must be maintained in reasonable order to permit audit?
22. Does your organization understand that instant Bingo may only
be conducted at such time as regular Bingo game is in progress,
and only at such locations and at such times as are specified in
this application?
23. Does your organization understand that the gross receipts in
the course of a reporting year from the playing of instant Bingo
may not exceed 33 1/3$ of the gross receipts of an organization's
Bingo operation?
24. Does your organization understand it may not sell an instant
Bingo card to an individual below sixteen years of age?
25. Does your organization understand that an organization whose
gross receipts from all bingo operations that exceed or are ex-
pected to exceed $75,000 in any calendar year shall have been
granted tax-exempt status pursuant to Section 501 C of the United
States Internal Revenue Service?
(Certificate must be attached.)
7
,~.. "'
26. Does your organization understand that a Certificate of Occu-
pancy must be obtained or be on file which authorizes this use at
the proposed location?
27. Does your organization understand that awards or prize money
or merchandise valued in excess of the following amounts are
illegal?
a. No door prize shall exceed twenty-five dollars.
b. No regular Bingo or special Bingo game shall exceed One Hund-
red dollars,
c. No jackpot of any nature whatsoever shall exceed One Thousand
Dollars, nor shall the total amount of jackpot prizes awarded
in any one calendar day exceed One Thousand Dollars,
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
NOTARIZATION: THE FOLLOWING OATH MUST BE TAKEN BY ALL
,APPLICANTS
I hereby swear or affirm under the penalties of
forth in §18,2 of the Code of Vir perjury as set
statements are true to the best of mynknowledge,ainfo mation,band
beliefs. All questions have been answered.
Signed by:
Title
Subscribed and sworn before me,
My commission expires:
-`; 19 ~
,._~
Home ddress
this C ~`~. day of ~~ ~~ 19 ~J"
RETURN THIS COMPLETED APPLICATION T0:
COMMISSIONER OF THE REVENUE
P.O. Box 20409
Roanoke, VA 24018-0513
Notary Public ~ `
State of Virginia
City of Roanoke
8
o
. w
NOT VALID UNLESS COUNTERSIGNED
The above application, having been found in due form, is ap rove
and issued to the applicant to have effect until December 31st o d
this calendar year, f
Date ~ C
Commi sinner of the evenue
The above application is not approved.
Date
Commissioner of the Revenue
9
~-3
AT THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, OCTOBER 24, 1989
RESOLUTION 102489-6.b REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF
TWIN MOUNTAIN CIRCLE INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia, as follows:
1. That this matter came this day to be heard upon the
proceedings herein, and upon the application of Twin Mountain
Circle from Twin Mountain Drive (Route 1097) in an easterly
direction to the cul-de-sac to be accepted and made a part of the
Secondary System of State Highways under Section 33.1-229 of the
Virginia State Code.
2. That it appears to the Board that drainage easements and
a fifty (50) foot right-of-way for said road have heretofore been
dedicated by virtue of a certain map\maps known as Section 4 of
Falling Creek Estates Subdivision which map was recorded in Plat
Book 9, Page 119, of the records of the Clerk's Office of the
Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, on October 13, 1978 and
that by reason of the recordation of said map no report from a
Board of Viewers, nor consent or donation of right-of-way from the
abutting property owners is necessary. The Board hereby guarantees
said right-of-way for drainage.
3. That said road known as Twin Mountain Circle and which
is shown on a certain sketch accompanying this Resolution, be, and
the same is hereby established as public road to become a part of
the State Secondary System of Highways in Roanoke County,
only from and after notification of official acceptance of said
street or highway by the Virginia Department of Transportation.
On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor
McGraw, and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisor Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTE:
~~~- ~•
Mary H. Allen, Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Phillip Henry, Director, Engineering
Arnold Covey, Director, Development & Inspections, and
copy for Virginia Department of Transportation
ITEM NUMBER `""
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: October 24, 1989
SUBJECT: Acceptance of Twin Mountain Circle into the Virginia
Department of Transportation Secondary System.
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
Akfer Development Corp. Inc. the developer of Falling Creek
Estates, Section 4, requests that the Board of Supervisors
approve a resolution to the Virginia Department of Transportation
requesting that they accept 0.14 miles of Twin Mountain Circle.
The staff has inspected this road along with representatives
of the Virginia Department of Transportation and find the road is
acceptable.
FISCAL IMPACT-
No county funding is required.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
The staff recommends that the Board approve a resolution to
the VDOT requesting that they accept Twin Mountain Circle into
the Secondary Road System.
SUBMITTED BY:
Phillip Henry, E.
Director of Engineering
APPROVED:
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
>- 3
Approved ( )
Denied ( )
Received ( )
Referred
to
Motion by:
ACTION
VOTE
No Yes Abs
Garrett
Johnson
McGraw
Nickens
Robers
Apo ~1-f~t \
~'t ~ /
wor,4p ~d ~ \
~. t ~ 4 ~~ .tt '
t~ •.ob
t ' ~ ~{I
::'~~.' i ~, ~ ~ VICINITY MAP ~ .~
L-3
--Q-
NORTB
~~
--
1.87Ac.
ie
22 is 1.30 Ac G~~'~
Bee~Z
4
e `o,.~t z/ 1.21 Ac~• ~ Oti ~ 1..5.5 Ac.
'1~ 6~ 2 y 9 8 cJC~
~ N ~
~'' - 20.1 27
A .20 5 _ 7 23 7a, ~ 1.34 Ac. s
• 4 _ ~0 2e
qN • N e ~~ C 88.18 104.68 • o
M O N • A ~ ~ ~~ ~` / 3~A ~oA' r GI
M ~ • 4 ,` a ~"aoe ZO
N N 51.32 d6 6B ~ ~
~ 97 80.02 23 ~ r. ~ ry ~~
~ 31 44.98 7767' : ~~ a ~~ IJ. ~ • e1i
Twin Mountains s2°" 40 72.57
e~ slse 95 2Z7 eOa~ ~ e~ 9
~O• 74.34 127.89 138.8 ~~ ~>>~
103 39 ~ ~ 13.89 ~ 706,78 83 72.81 R~ ~ •~O~ 84.43 723
~ ~ I 73J S 94 9 ~
76 0 75 74 N °7°+ . ~; is 65
N • N i N ' ~ A ~ ~ ~ 66 n ~
o ,; . ~.
PROPOSED ADDITION SHOWN IN GRAY
DESCRIPTION: ~
1) Twin Mountain Circle from the intersection
of Twin Mountain Drive (Rt. 1079) to cul-de-sac.
LENGTH: (1) 0.14 Miles
RIGHT OF WAY: (1) 50 Feet
ROADWAY WIDTH: (1) 30 Feet
SURFACE WIDTH: (1) 20 Feet
SERVICE: (1) 4 Homes
IMPROVEMENT NECESSARY:
RECOMMENDATION:
_ _
ACCEPTANCE OF TWIN MOUNTAIN CIRCLE INTO THE
COMMUNI?YSERVICBS VIRGINNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
ANDDBVSLOPMENT SECONDARY SYSTEM
3
~'_°'
AT THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, OCTOBER 24, 1989
RESOLUTION REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF
TWIN MOUNTAIN CIRCLE INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That this matter came this day to be heard upon the
proceedings herein, and upon the application of Twin Mountain
Circle from Twin Mountain Drive (Route 1097) in an easterly
direction to the cul-de-sac to be accepted and made a part of the
Secondary System of State Highways under Section 33.1-229 of the
Virginia State Code.
2. That it appears to the Board that drainage easements
and a fifty (50) foot right-of-way for said road have heretofore
been dedicated by virtue of a certain map\maps known as Section 4
of Falling Creek Estates Subdivision which map was recorded in
Plat Hook 9, Page 119, of the records of the Clerk's Office of
the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, on October 13,
1978 and that by reason of the recordation of said map no report
from a Board of Viewers, nor consent or donation of right-of-way
from the abutting property owners is necessary. The Board
hereby guarantees said right-of-way for drainage.
3. That said road known as Twin Mountain Circle and which
is shown on a certain sketch accompanying this Resolution, be,
and the same is hereby established as public road to become a
part of the State Secondary System of Highways in Roanoke County,
4
only from and after notification of official acceptance of said
street or highway by the Virginia Department of Transportation.
5
~~/
covxr~ of ROANORE, vlxcnJlA
[JI~iPPROPRIATID BAT.AN('_F: - CAPITAL FtJI~ID
Beginning Balance at July 1, 1989
September 12, 1989 Contribution towards Hollins Fire Truck
Balance as of October 24, 1989
Submitted by
~~.~~
Diane D. Hyatt
Director of Finance
$56,194
(25,000)
31 194
COiJNI'Y OF ROANORE, VIRGINIA
UNAPPROPRIATED BALANCE - GII~IERAL FCJI~ID
Balance at July 1, 1989 (Unaudited) $4,038,318
Balance as of October 24, 1989 4.038.318
Submitted by
Diane D. Hyatt
Director of Finance
~~`
C~OUN7.'Y OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA
RESERVE FOR BOARD CONTINGENCY
Beginning Balance at July 1, 1989 $11,395
Additional Amount from 1989-90 Budget 50,000
June 14, 1989 Contribution to Va. Amateur Sports (25,000)
July 11, 1989 Purchase of drainage easement (5,000)
July 11, 1989 Option on 200 acres real estate (3,750)
July 25, 1989 Donation to Julian Wise Foundation (5,000)
August 8, 1989 County supplement for new position (869)
in Sheriff's department
August 22, 1989 Part time volunteer coordinator (5,800)
August 22, 1989 Public Information for Police (9,000)
Department referendum
Balance as of October 24, 1989 6 976
Submitted by
~.c,cx,,.,~ ~ ~ ~a~-
Diane D. Hyatt
Director of Finance
N- y
CCUNTY GF RGANOKE
INCOHE ANAL'fSIS
GENERAL OPERATI;4G FUND
1988-89
----------- --------------- -
--------- 138?-90 --- -
____ __.----------- ---- -----_~__ _ --
.
__~------------
ACTUAL
.---- - ------ ---
r
,4CT JAL --------- -
-----------
--------------
---
-
--
6-30-89 - ---
_.._--------
g-30_gg --- -- ------_
ACTUAL _
____--___ .. -- -
~
_
- -
9UDGET (12 !lCNTr.S! ,
(~ !tCNTH~ B?~DGET 3-36-89
lneC., ~'
AX.ES-PERSGN.4L PROPERTY
_-___
~ 23,780,009
I
-----------
_
29,09?,910
14,939 --- ----%-
_
- --
I
-----------
$ 18
511
790 (3 HONTHS)
-----------
--
---
"'da, a
J.'."R :ROP~TY TAXES D 2D0 D
+ + 00
1 257 293 I1,667,171
t ~
23 ~
444,56,,
4 ,
,
11,fi68,447 340,b56
572
788
SALES TA,I
9USI"LESS LICENSE -+_ _c__-
4,330 492 -_ ,~
377
__ _ _,----
3 841 459 3., 318-
-----__~
---------
~
1 3
--
3 I,4?5,CG0
_ _
~
- ,
1 7
_9,.,69
-.
-
.
_AUTO DEC_ALS 2,40G,UOG
1 2,182,735 ~
~09,5i2 2
5 4,20G,000
2
IOG
000 1,663,3?9 `
_
-----.--
OTiiER LOCAL TAXES ,I50,D00_
4,015,22 0 __1,2.83,1.74
3
700
237 52,106
____
6
-
5 ,
,
1,325,000 I11,o06
49~gi4
DGG TAGS
°~~NIYG
FEES
18,DOJ ~ ,
,
14,963 .
49,
034
1
653 lfi 4,189,40 1,DI5,708 2
-
- ___ --
---.___ ------_
BJILDI'+G FEES
_______ I5 G00
__._._,.._ --
3
__
26,t_26_-
_ ,
-- 6-,-603_
-- - 9
44 15,500
10 500 I 36
4
OTHER PERHiT, FEES & LICEIISES
45,000
11,282
321,549
31
525
81,473
--
7
- --
-24-
---- ' -
-- 408,611
7
____;G4_,.~~_ _
, 4
~
4
_._.
?~
_F-';=~ AND FORFEITURES
SALES 6. USE OF E 1 m
QJIPHEN
& SUPPf
IES
I6?~D00 ,
209,125 ,953
29,333 70
18 7 250
+ ~
10, 79 ;,
1
,
,
`'i{AGES rr^Ofl SERVICES 0 151
150
0 I65,DOG
0 48,261
y
~~COVER>;D_COST_I,OCAL _-
-`_-.."`____`-- 150,5ID
:
504 629
- ~ 162,774
558 006 5I,D71
2 34 165,268 50
43,157
26
r.JC PRGFITS
''ONHONWEALTR'S ATTORNEY EXPENSES _
.-_._
236,D45
2 -. ,_
185,794 27,253_-----_
41~gpg - 45
-~-~--- -
18
-- 554,500
260
000
_ 163,01
29
-
ca^~-"-•; „•~ w•; -
_ ~r:~:~'v -",.P^y~Ea^ ~
C'~H!!'~SIC'iER OF T 60 503
,
__3i77D,00G ~
225 982
3,255,067
38,860
42D 077
15 ,
251,670 41,644
62,53.3 21
25
..a REVENUE SEXPENSES
TREASURER'S EXPENSES
179,485 -
147,593 --L-
24,464 11
~4 3,837,277 720,373 13
--
~EI,Far~ w~,ur
- 171,853
1 168,125 28,495
17 1.80,000
iBD
DOb 31,357 I8
--
SAAR:' GRA;aT ____._-
961,44I
1z593~546
45i~,-5Tti
23 ,
2
067 474 13,i9D 7
OTRER STATE REVENUE
NON
175,D6D
286,863
174,860
239
336
43,715
-
25 .
-~-`~ --`-
175,0D0 501 04
~-_1-_
43,783
-.ZY
'
25
-REVENUE RECEIPT 5 035 ,
6 520 104,159 36 225,000 138
190 61
TRANSFER FROH OTHER FUNDS - 563 11 0 ,
1
165
----------0-
--------
--o- - 0
------ --
---
0 ,
- --
0 --
0
_ _ _ _
_ _
BEGI'iNI?1; 3ALANCE USED TO 9ALANCE~ --~-.-,43~9~_ODO 5$,4111315 477,188_
-.~__
__r___7 -
61,8631267 ~--~~-----
_5 1b3
83i ---
8
COSTS OPERATrONS
TEKPC'RA~' LOANS A :,EASE PURCHASE PROCEEDS
-_- --
4,091,702
765 066
0
0
0
525
600 ~
D _
_
559,133 D , '~'
D D
_-_-____-. - .~... _..~. 62,295708 $ 58,970 44__4:I771Ifl8 ---
- ------__ ----- - -
__
7 ~ -----------
62,388
267 t ----------- -
5 Ib3 8 --
____
, 31
SPECIAL CONSIDERATION ADDED TO BASIC CCl(PUTATION
Finan.~ Staier~ents: Page 1 cP 3
l~'-~
COUNTY OF ROANGKE
STATEMENT OF EXPENDITURES ~____ -_ __ - --------
THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER "s0, i989
BUDGET EXPE?+DED X -----
GENERAL ADMINISTRATION 131
$
171
~ 66,255 39 -_------ -
-- --
_ BOARD OF SUPERVISORS __ __
~ _
,
_
_ _-
068
241 - -- -
58,461 -
`24
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ,
769
241 63,164 26
PERSONNEL
COUNTY ATTORNEY ,
186,341 52,517 - _ 28 ~ -------.-
Cb?IMISTIONER OF REVBNUB 513,713 109,513 21
23
TREASURER 504,227 114,814
ELECTIONS 160 X62 32,675 20 ---
- _
-
-- 7 (0)
-- SESgUICENTENNIAL (2G,513)
FISCAL MANAGEMENT
---- ASST, CO ADM, MANAGEMENT SERVICES 69,fi21. 15,737 23
COUNTY ASSESSOR fi16,908 139,067 23
29
L ACCOUNTING
CENTRA 368 394.. 1D7,024 ------
-~__ ----------
-
_
_ ~ 6
_
_
-----
PR000REMENT 218 , 274 56 , 85 9
19
MANAGEMENT & BUDGET 122,636 22,807 36
RISK MANAGEMENT 1,130,318 411,199 -- -
JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION.
100,964_
_
.
96,159_
----°5_----- --------------._----_
_ __ CIRCUIT_COURT - __
GENERAL DISTRICT COURT ._..
..__,_
_
18,740 -
_
3,362 -
18
MAGISTRATES 730
136
11 78
59a
2 I1
-_.--.._-------__
24
_ 1 &_D_DISTRICT COURT
CLERK OF CIRCUIT COURT __
,
516,653 ,
119,625 ._- _^__
-
~23
CGMMONWEALTH'S ATTORNEY 312,299 7fl,206 25
PRGBATION OFFICE_-__._...~~._~..._-_..___._ __. _44..2175 ._ ._._.-4682--- -------`1--------------------------------------------__
5
----- VTC'"I~! WITNESS 6,670 9
33
PtiBLIC SAFETY __
POLiCING &, INVESTIGATING-- _ _
4,210,467 --
1,100,159
HIGHWAY SAFETY COMMISSION 960 154
_..__.____ _
FIRE
-
_ .__.1:891, Z24_.._: _.. _.619_, 083
_ J-----
---
__._.._._._-._-
____ _ __ __
RESCUE S@UAD 422,189 200,884
EMERGENCY SERVICES & I!AZ ?,AT RESPONSE 41,615 9,264
CONFINEMENTICARB OF PRISONERS 2,016,724 _
---- _- 528,02°
-----
_
_
__-----_--- ANIMAL CONTROL _~ - 164,044
- 52,722
HAZ-MAT RESPONSE D .10
HUGE DISASTER RECOVERY 0 - G
PUBLIC FACILITIES
SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC FACILITIES
STREET LIGHTS
~HGItdEERING
_ __ _ _GENERAL_SERVICES------_-----_---__.__.
BUILDINuS & GROU?dDS
PARKS & RECREATION
REFUSE
PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION
GROU1dDS MAINTENANCE
16
__ 33 ___-_._____
48
22
26
108,873 29,247 27
a D
633,357 189,157 30
~ °L 24
86,204 155,398 i9
9~5,a6~. 247,flsfl 25
1,519,749 ~
395, 57
-.-- 2F
_
-------------- ----------------
. __ n. __-.-_.
----- F~~4.~D ~- - f._--_
-~~ ~c ~2
889,896 232,249 33
. '''.:... ....,'"ENE};~.,. ~'.~i ~ :i- ,
-- -
COUNTY OF ROAh'OXE -_ _
-
STATEMENT OF EXPENDITURES
THREE
M01dTRS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,
1989 _ ___ _ _
~ --
HEALTH & SGCIAL SERVICES
PUBLIC HEALTH 412,599 101,144 25 -
SOCIAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION 1,846,244. 417,924 23
__PU'BLIC ASSISTANCE .~ __~__.._..___._954,-03D _- - 212,394----- _
22
-
INSTITUTIONAL CARE
36,606
13,488 _
________ _ _ _ __------ - ---
37
SGCIAL SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS 94,984 17,496 18
DEVELOPMENT ------~-----
PLANNING & ZONING. 283,403 85,055 30
_~_ ~CONOHIC DEVELOPMENT _ ____ 257~I11; 1"s~367 52
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 134,602 __
33,G16 -__
25
PLANNING COMMISSION 18,695 4,644 25
CONSTRUCTION BUILDING SERVICES 262,842 71,666 27
NON-DEPARTMENTAL
_____ASST. CO. ADS. HUMAN SERVICES ~ 97,675 __ __,_____22s619 23
LIBRARY 1,145,624 277,287 24
E`:TE'dSION & CONTINUING EDUCATION 104,694 1,458 1
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 594,298 60,736 10
CONTRIBUTIONS TO SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS
30,000 _
19,200 _ _ __
64 -
MISCELLANEOUS 867,430. 345,244 40
------- ~OLISO.L~DATIQA ~...._ _ 200000_ _1Z 462--- - 6 -_--_----_.__-
-_
-
-~--.._-.
-_
.---
TOTAL ------------
26,904,467 ------------ ---
7,270,258 ---------
27
TRANSFERS AND RESERVES
_~tEI.lf1I(1RSABldF~.~~P.~N~~IiEE~.__~.._.~_._ -.___._.__.- 0 ---.145.1_-- -----~---------
--
--
TRANSFER TO DEBT SERVICE 5,392,690 529,511 --------___ __..
--
10
. TRANSFER TO INTERNAL SERVICE 310,132 76,458 25
TRANSFER TO SCHOOL OPERATING FUND_____ 28 6-37,950 ! . 0 0
TRANSFER TO SEWER FUND
40,000 __
0~ ~_
_-_~_~_ _~___-._-.-___
0 A
TRANSFEP, TO UTILITY CAPITAL 525,000 131,250 25
_.._F.At~:SFF~_-TQ_OApITAI~P~.Q~i~G'C;z-...._____ ` _3~3~3~~- ---._~.°.,111_,_ _.?.5-----..---------
-
TRAI;SFER TO YGUTH HAVEN 78,658 19,664 --
26
TRANSFER TO GARAGE II 120,000 0 G
UNA~PRGPRIATED BALANCE
-- 3 750
__-1-1- -1-- - 0
-- 0
RESERVE FOR BOARD CONTINGENCY
(669J
------
a _ _ _ __ _
----- ---
0 ~ ~- ^-
---- TOTAI, TRANSFE~t ITEMS 35,4831800
: 85Q
$45 2
___...~...____ _-
.
___._
------------ -- _
~
_-_--
---------- --- _--__--_____-_-T.___-----__------_-____~_._
---------
GRE,11D TCTAL 62,388 7 8 I2~0?_-_____-_1°'-------------_-----_--
------------ ------------ ------------
------------ ------------ ------------
October 24, 1989
County staff requests the Board to adopt a motion to enter
into executive session within the provisions of the Virginia
Freedom of Information Act as follows:
(a) to discuss a specific legal matter requiring the
provision of legal advice by the County Attorney and
briefings by staff members concerning Consolidation and
the Town of Vinton in accordance with Sections 2.1-344
A 7 and 15.1-945.7 D of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as
amended.
REGULAR MEETING OF THE BO o~oKE UCOUNTY ADMINISTRATION
AT A HELD AT THE R 1989
COUNTY , VIRGINIA, OCTOBER 24,
CENTER ON TUESDAY,
RESOLUTION 102102 N CONFORMITY WITH THEECODE OF
MEETING WAS HEL
VIRGINIA
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
on this date pursuant
Virginia has convened an executive meeting
an affirmative recorded vote and in accordance with the
to and
rovisions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act,
p inia
WHEREAS, Section 2.1-344.1 of the Code of Virg
a certification by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
requires
t Virginia that such executive meeting was conducted in
Coun y,
inia Law.
conformity with Virg
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of
rs of Roanoke County, Virginia hereby certifies that, to
Superviso
the best of each members knowledge: exempted from
1. Only public business matters lawfully
eetin requirements by Virginia law were discussed in the
open m g lies,
executive meeting which this certification resolution apP
and
2, Only such public business matters as were identifle
the motion convening the executive meeting were heard,
in
sed or considered by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
discus
County, Virginia. Supervisor
On motion of Supervisor Garrett, seconded by
McGraw, and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES:
NAYS:
Supervisor Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett
None
A COPY TESTE:
cc:
.~ .
Mary H. Allen, Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
File
Executive Session File
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY , VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, OCTOBER 24, 1989
RESOLUTION CERTIFYING EXECUTIVE MEETING WAS
HELD IN CONFORMITY WITH THE CODE OF VIRGINIA
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia has convened an executive meeting on this date pursuant
to an affirmative recorded vote and in accordance with the
provisions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and
WHEREAS, Section 2.1-344.1 of the Code of Virginia
requires a certification by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia that such executive meeting was conducted in
conformity with Virginia Law.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of
Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia hereby certifies that, to
the best of each members knowledge:
1. Only public business matters lawfully exempted from
open meeting requirements by Virginia law were discussed in the
executive meeting which this certification resolution applies,
and
2. Only such public business matters as were identified
in the motion convening the executive meeting were heard,
discussed or considered by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia.
~ P AN MF
~ ~ 9
2 '~
~ 2
a
18 ~~ 88
gE8QU1CENTENN~P~
A Btauti(u1 Beginning
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
ELMER C. HODGE
(~nuntg n# ~Rnttnake
October 26, 1989
Rev. Samuel W. Crews
Coopers Cove Baptist Church
c/o Commissioner of Revenue's Office
Roanoke, Virginia 24018
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
LEE GARRETT. CHAIRMAN
WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
RICHARD W ROBERS. VICE-CHAIRMAN
CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL CIST RICT
BOB L JOHNSON
HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL D6T RIOT
STEVEN A. MCGRAW
CATgyygA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
HARRY C NICKENS
VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
Dear Reverend Crews:
the Board of Supervisors, I would like to take this
On behalf of reciation for your attending
opportunity to let you know of our P989, to offer the invocation.
the meeting on Tuesday, October 24,
ortant to ask God's blessing on these
We feel it is most irc-P to His will and for the good
meetings so that all is done according
of all citizens.
our willingness to present the invocation
We appreciate very much Y fortunate to be able to call on
when called upon. We are to h lp us. Thank you for taking your
someone with your ability
time to be with us.
Sinc ely,
Le Garrett, Chairman ervisors
Roanoke County Board of Sup
bjh Wa ne Compton, Commissioner of Revenue
cc: The Honorable R. Y
P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24018-0798 • (703) 772"2004
-.a.!a• 'µeP rtb4>rhr+"a1~kNMS4d~vi~i•~.:fMr.,.,c;,.c.- ._ ..
~~~~F
ti 9
Z
~ 2
a
18 ~~ 88
8F$QUICENTEMN~P~
A BcautifulBeginning
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
ELMER C. HODGE
Ms. Betty Ellis
1478 Abbey Circle
Vinton, Virginia 24179
October 25, 1989
LEE GARRETT. CHAIRMAN
WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
RICHARD WEROB GRMAGISTER ALi DISTR CtT
BOB L. JOHNSON
HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
STEVEN A. MCGRAW
CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
HARRY C. NICKENS
VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
Dear Ms. Ellis:
At their regular meeting on Tuesday, October 24, 1989, test of the
County Board of Supervisors unanimously approved the requ
William Byrd High School a conducted ono Novemberu3, 1989 raffle
permit. The raffle will b
The fee has been paid and your receipt is enclosed.
consider this letter to be your permit, and I suggest it
You may
be displayed on the premises where the raffle is to be conducte .
The State Code provides that raffle and bingo permits be issued on
a calendar-year basis and such permits issued will expire on
December 31, 1989. This p~ ont, however, is only valid on the date
specified in your applica
If I may be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to
contact me at 772-2004.
Sincerely,
~.~/-
Mary H. Allen, Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisor
bjh
Enclosures
cc: Commissioner of the Revenue
Commonwealth Attorney
County Treasurer
i
P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24018-0798 (703> 772-2004
C~auntg of ~Rattnn~r
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
Brenda:
Dinner on the 24th:
Check with Mr. HodgelinMa~kdHeath anddLentBooneeand lettthem
schedule dinner. Ca
know. Also call Tim Gubala.
Need to let the board members know that even though there is no
evening session, they will be having dinner.
Mary Allen ~~-~-X ~"`~`'
__
;€
,/~ ~ ~ ~
t
,.
~ .. ~
,~ ~..
~~~/ ~ ~`
~,
~,,~_
~~" ~-
~0i~/I`~t. Gt~-.~ ~~L~~ji„~.o-~~`'
~~a-9o?~a
~~ ~~ ~~
~~-
io - ia- ~9
ham- ~ ~
~c~~ a~
~~~,~~
~~~- ~
~~~~`-~'
R
g-29-89
Mr. Hodge: a meeting with Vinton
and said that he wanted at 10-10_89 meeting
Mr. Garrett called Executive Sesssion
Town Council and Board.
Brenda Allen -
cc: Mary
9
i
/. rn~< R
~/~ c~~
i~~ ~-
The R:°gional Partnership
lll Franklin Plaza, Suite 333
" Roanoke, Virginia 24011
703 343-1550
Fax: 703 344-6096
`\`
,.\ \V
ROOAFNO'RGINIA~
Ech -
~, ~Lc~n~..e~J
~-n.- ~.~ °~~-'
,~ ~ .~ . ~
~~~
9=~~ ~9
September 13, 1989
Mr. Elmer Hodge
Roanoke County Administrator
County of Roanoke
P.O. Box 29800
Roanoke, VA 24018
,.v~ 01~ s
~~[ l
Dear Elmer:
p 1989, and
Len Boone and I have discussed your letter of Se tember 5,
it would be most appropriate not to
feel, based on its contents, but to expand our meeting
have our meeting between the three of us,
to include all five members of thcoBtenasoof Syourvletterothatacome
County. It is apparent from the based
munication to you and your Board is not what it should be and,
on the tone of your letter, it appears this inadequate communication
is causing deterioration in what should be a very good relationship
r,AtwPen Roanoke County and The Regional Partnership.
Based on this conclusiouickl
this meeting occur as q Y
your reply.
Yours very truly,
THE REGIONAL PARTNERSHIP
~~ u~.~ti.
Mark Heath, C.E.D.
Executive Director
/nms
fas lpossible~f Len and sI w pl rawait
a--r~ 9- ~. !o
Bll~ Ridge
Mountains' Majesty.
1 t' /~ J ~''~-
9
-~."". 1 r
~C~~ G~--
--~
s
/!
~,
v _.
r~'.a
~~ JQ `~ k~
i ~
~: , c°' r Qty
of ~,` t ~ ~ .~¢~
J ca a
,o ~~ a a' a
a ~~ ~'~ a ~
oc~ ;~ ¢a ~o ~~~
~° c~ ~ ro ~ ~~~
J
~t ~ ~ . ~ ~~ ~r ~`
~ ~ ~~c aaa~r Fa~~ ~
a ~
a ~'~c F
~ ~c ~r v ~o v~
roc ~ ~~a ~o~ t~~a ~
r '`
3 roc ~t .~` boa
r a ~ ~ ~
~JC~' a ~~~ r~~ ~r
r~ ~ ~t
,moo ~
c~'
r
Q PC~~F
z~
J a
18 ~~ 88
SFSG!/ICENTENN~P`'
A Bmuti~ulBeginning
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
ELMER C. HODGE
September 5, 1989
Mr. Mark D. Heath, ExecPtive Director Inc.
The Regional Partnershi of Roanoke Valley,
Suite 333
111 Franklin Plaza 24011
Roanoke, Virginia
LEE GARRE-.CHAIRMAN
.4,ti DSOR I-ILLS MAG~S'E?!AL DIS T?IC`
RICHARD W. ROBERS. VICE-CHAIRMAN
CAVE SPRING MAGS'E RIAL DISTRICT
BOB L JOHNSON
HOLLINS MAG STE RIAL DISTRICT
STEVEN A MCGRA'Jv
CATAW'BA MAG c-E?IAL D6T RIC'
I--IgRR'r (_,'. NICKENS
VIN TON MAGtS`ERIAL DIST?IC?
Dear Mark:
I just received your most attrUnfortunatelytio~ happensotonbeoone
at the Partnership's new offices.
the same date as a regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors and t e
County Resource Authority.
has been expressed by several Board
Concern about the Partnership interested in the
members who question whether or not rovideraamonthly report of the
County. The Board has asked me to p inning to question
Partnership's activities. Board members are also beg we do not have
what we are getting for our annual coaS~iyear~nsFordoury$64,000
more prospects. We had four in the p
contribution, that works out to $16,000 each.
Scheduling the open house on a date that conflicts wishnotrggvenr
Board meeting is just another indication that the County
very much consideration.
I want to meet with you sometime in the next froblemksorothescuss
this further to sroblemt wI willdhave myrsecretarypschedule a meeting'
appearance of a p
with you and Mr. Boone.
Very truly ours,
Elmer C . Hodge,; ,~ s .~
County Administrator
ECH/meh
cc - Board of Supervisors
Mr. Len Boone
Mr. John W. Lambert, Jr.
C~n~Yn~~ of ~vttnvke
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
P.O BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 2 4018-07 9 8 (703) 772-2004
AN ~~< ALL-AM~ICA C j
~ ~ 9 /r
~~ ,~
~~~~~
,8 ~ ~ 9
sF$OUICENTENN~'~ ~ • " •~
ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
A BtwwtifulBtginning
ACTION AGENDA
OCTOBER 10, 1989
Board 'of Supervsors~~'meefing. ` Regula'r~
~~Welcome to the Roanoke County
meetings are held on the second Tuesday and thm onuthe fourthyTuesday0
p.m. Public Hearings will be heard at 7:00 p.
of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced.
A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.)
1. Roll Call. (3:05 P.M.) ALL PRESENT
2. Invocation: The Reverend Charles Doyle
Hollins Road Baptist Church
3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag.
B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA
ITEMS.
ECH ASKED FOR EXECUTIVETIONSCONCERNING~CONSOLOIDATION,34ANNEXATION TAND
DISCUSS PROBABLY_LITIGA
TOWN OF VINTON~FOLLOWING PROCLAMATIONS.
RR ADDED PROCLAMATION OF APPRECIATION TO APPALACHIAN POWER
C, PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS AND AWARDS
1. Proclamation declaring October 1989 as Recycling Month
in Roanoke County.
KELLY WHITNEY, CLEAN VALLEY COUNCIL RECEIVED
2. Proclamation expressing appreciation to those who
worked to restore electricity following Hurricane Hugo.
BARRY SNODGRASS, APCO, RECEIVED
LG/RR EXECUTIVE SESSION AT 3:15 P.M. - URC
OUT OF EXEC. SESSION AT 4:20
RESOLUTION CERTIFYING EXECUTIVE SESSION
R-1010$__-1
LG/HCN - URC
D, WORK SESSION
1, Improvements to the Stormwater Management Program
PRESENTED BY JOHN HUBBARD
VOTE TAKEN UNDER 1ST READING OF ORD.
2.
Establishment of Drainage Maintenance Project
Priorities.
PRESENTED ~ BY PHIL 'HENRY.
VOTE TAKEN UNDER NEW BUSINESS
E, NEW BUSINESS
1, Prioritization of additional drainage maintenance
projects.
A-lplp89_22
HCN/RR TO APPROVE PROJECTS - URC
BLJ DIRECTED STAFF TgAINAEGEBPROJECTS r(P29O59}OFTHATEWII'I' NOT BE
SOLUTIONS TO THOSE D
FUNDED THIS FISCAL YEAR
2, Resolution requesting that State Route 311 be
designated as a Virginia Byway
~j R-101089-3
`~ HCN/RR TO ADOPT RESO
URC WITH SAM ABSENT
F, REQUEST FOR WORK SESSIONS
NONE
G, REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS
NONE
g, FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES
1, Ordinance amending Sections 10-4 and 10-15 and
adding Section 10-19, Chapter 10, Licenses of the
Roanoke County Code.
RR/BLJ TO APPROVE 1ST READING
G URC
~ 2ND - 10/24/89
s_-
2
2, Ordinance amending Chi
Sediment Control", of
amending Section 8-11
Generally" to provide
stormwater management
HCN/SAM TO APPROVE 1ST READING
URC
2ND - 10/24/89
ipter 8, "Erosion and
the Roanoke County Code by
~a), "Control Measures
for the adoption of
criteria.
I, SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES
1, Ordinance amending and reenacting Article III,
Division 2e ofeChapteru2lAsTaxation of thetRoanoke
Real Estat
County Code.
0-101089-4
BLJ/SAM TO APPROVE
URC
AT.FRED POWELL SPOKE
NONE
J, APPOINTMENTS
1, Community Corrections Resources Board
2, Health Department Board of Directors
3, Industrial Development Authority
4, Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission
5, Court Service Unit Advisory Council/Youth and
Family Services Advisory Board
R, REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS
NICKENS/MCGRAW MOTION TO INTON OUOD HAVETSIAI'~IPREROGATIVESNTENT
THAT CITIZENS IN TOWN OF V
UNDER A RESTRUCTURED GO wORNMENT~`A~S TMEYOPT ONTOFASEAEK~INGHTHE R
CITIZENS OF WEST COUNTY
OWN DESTINY WITH THE CITY OF SALEM SHOULD CONSOLIDATION BE
APPROVED. URC
3
L, CONSENT AGENDA
~nucENT AGENDA ARE
ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE
CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WILL BE
ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED
BELOW. IF DIT~SCONSENT AGENDA AND WILLTBE CONSIDERED
REMOVED FROM
SEPARATELY.
R-101089
BLJ/SAM TO APPROVE
URC._:. ... ..
1.
A-10108 -5.a
2.
A-101089-5.b
3.
A-101089 5•c
4.
A-101089- .d
Request for Approval of Raffle Permit - Botetourt
Jaycees
Confirmation of committee appointments to the
Fifth Planning District Commission and the
Grievance Panel.
Appropriation of additional overtime fundsHills
increase enforcement activities in Boxley
Approval of Special Leave Request for Workers'
Compensation Injury - Carl Catron.
M, CITIZENS' COMI~NTS AND COMMUNICATIONS
NONE
N, REPORTS
HCN/SAM TO RECEIVE AND FILE
UW
1, Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance
2, General Fund Unappropriated Balance
3, Board Contingency Fund
4, Accounts Paid - September 1989
4
p, EXECUTIVE SES440N pursuant to the Code of Virginia
Section 2.1 3
HELD FOLLOWING PROCLAMATIONS
p, CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE SESSION
APPROVED FOLLOWING PROCLAMATIONS AND EXECUTIVE SESSION
.. - Q , ~ ADJOURNMENT °at ~ ~ : 3 0 p . ttt . -
HCN/SAM - UVV
5
G~-~
~a~~-~ ~~
lei, d~~~"'
U,N,~ , >4 ~Yi ~q
S~ 3 3 t~'~ Q°~
~~' ~-~-~
S~-9 G~~~
~ 9. ~~~
~~~~~~ ~y~~y
~(o-m-yr-~.~~
Asti ~ G~-
~~~
~/4 6 C~ 7/~- 045/79
U~=ri~ ~
~~!~ V
5a~-o ~-~~ ~ for ~--
J
Faso ~~ ~,. ~
~U-~-~~
~~
5z~ ~-~-, ~,~- as~o~ s'
SD~ ~l~~~nm~-~' ~.
G~
~,~~-~ ~ ~~~ ~9
~~~~
/SJ ~~~9
~~ ~-~ ~-~
C~ l
WBHS CHEERLEADING BY LAWS
ARTICLE I - NAME
The name of the club shall be the WBHS-Cheer leading Booster Clu
ARTICLE II ort WBHS Cheerleading and to be
The object of this Club shafinancialssupport as well as a voice in
of service to them, offering
dealing with others.
ARTICLE III- MEMBERSHIP rand arents,
Membership shall be open to all parents of WBHS Cheerleaders, g P
and friends .
ARTICLE IV - SECTION OFFICERS
The officers of this club shall be as follows
PRESIDENT:
VICE PRESIDENT:
SECRETARY:
TREASURER:
WAYS AND MEANS:
ril meeting of each year, the club shall nominate from
SECTION 2 - At the Ap committee of three members who shall report
the floor a nominating
nominations at the May meeting.
SECTION 3- In the case. of a vacancy occuring in the office of Presided,
the Vice President shall sushall be filledfby therexecutivepboard.
term. All other vacancies
SECTION 4 - The vote shall be by babloacclaimation,is more than one nominee,
otherwise the vote will be y
ARTICLE V DUTIES OF OFFICERS
of the President to preside at all meetings
SECTION 1 - It shall be the duty ertaining to that office. She shall be
and to perform all duties p
chairman of the executive board and ex-officio member of all
committee .
committees except the nominating
SECTION 2 - In the absence of the President, the V.P. shall perform all duties
pertaining to the office. The V.P. shall be in charge of the telephone
committee.
shall record and keep on permanent file the minutes
SECTION 3 - The Secretary
of alb regular and called meetings of the club, She shall also atten
to all correspondence of the club.
SECTION 4 - The treasurer shall recieVeceiltsoandsdisbursements andlshallll
dues, keep an account of all r p earl report shall be
pay out funds by order of thatcthe•May meeting.
submitted to the membership
SECTION 5 - Ways and Means shall be responsible for fund raising for the club.
PUBLIC NOTICE
Please be .advised that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, at its meeting on October 24, 1989, at the
Roanoke County Administration Center, 3738 Brambleton Avenue,
Roanoke, Virginia, at the afternoon session beginning at 3:00 p.m.,
or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, will hold a
public hearing on the following:
ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTIONS 10-4 AND 10oF5 THED ROANOKE
SECTION 10-19 OF CHAPTER 10, LIC~S~
COUNTY CODE
All members of the public interested in the matter set forth
above may appear and be heard at the time and place aforesaid.
r Y ` ~~~
Paul M. Nlanoney
County Attorney
Roanoke County, Virginia
Publish on the following dates in the morning edition:
October 10, 1989
October 17, 1989 '
Send invoice to:
Ms. Mary H. Allen, Clerk
Board of Supervisors
P. O. Box 29800
Roanoke, Virginia 24018-0798
PUBLIC NOTICE
Please be advised that the Board of Supe ~ ~ rs of Roanoke
at its meetin on October ice' 1989, at the
County, Virginia, g
Roanoke County Administration Center, 3738 Brambleton Avenue,
Roanoke, Virginia, at the evening session beginning at 3:00 p.m.
or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, will hold a
public hearing on the following:
ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 8, "EROSION AND SEDIMENT
CONTROL" OF THE L MEASURES UGENERALLY"B TO PROVIDE FOR THE
8-11(a), "CONTRO
ADOPTION OF STORMWATER MANAGEMENT CRITERIA
All members of the public interested in the matter set forth
above may appear and be heard at the time and place aforesaid.
Paul M. Mahoney ~
County Attorney
Roanoke County, Virginia
Publish on the following dates in the morning edition:
October 10, 1989
October 17, 1989
Send invoice to:
Board of Supervisors
p. O. Box 29800
Roanoke, Virginia 24018-0798
VCPA AMiARDS PROGRAM
One of the objsetiw• sl tke Vir~iwla Cttlsswe Pl tan^~ th ~ at sue` Cp~1 1.
"te.neouratslieitrand etMr •„repriate metkeds." Te Wreker eMM etijsetive. VCPA
r.ss.rck, w r
has sn AwA1tDS PROGAAIrt-
CLwsst3 OF AWARDS:
A CITIZENS AWARD .halt w tiww to • ~reu' er iwdivlitat ekat kas made •
aetaD-s and eowatrveetvs eontributiew to th~l: n~ ri~,tiew K ka ~a lew~u-t
the eo,nnwnitr. ration. Mate, or natiew.
objsetivs worthy of ~tatewida intsrsat. provide • asnaitsls enaarar to a real wesd. and
ersaN bsnslita bsrowd purely • h oml`eo^tsadr,si eowspieueus srerk eva' alperied el
jset Inttiatsd awd earrisd thres• .
rsara it ehs eumulativs attaet of the rrerk i. impestant. lawwers er otMr eitissns or
CITATIONS mar bs ~ivsn to pritsw.iwia~:ir ~~swrsphaw sntendad thslr aetivl-
~roupe •hs, as ve-untss es. or la pu
tus lay Dsroad ehs routtne rsauirsments of duty: whose pseeewee tw • eenemualtY tsss
eontributsd aotablr to lnersased i„terest In P-awwin~ awd has tsd to pesittve plawniw~
aeeeenplishs+snta: who hays undsrtaksw and earrisd through eemnwwltr presets which
mar 1» mots li,nitsd in aeopt feat otMrsrise eoneparabls to flee CITtZtN AWARD
projsct eritsria. ~,S ~epls ethsr
YO~iTH AWARDS mar M ~ivsn to rsco~nlss awd eneousa~e r
than eolle nts, who bacema involved in the plannia~ proeese awd in the im-
provernnst snd/or dsvslopmsnt of their eommu~ ia~tsn for aeadentie esesllsnce awd
STVDENT ACHIEVE~,IEN? AWARDS may ~cheels elths .gists universities,
prelaaaiowal promise, to •tudenes in the p-annia~
Neminationnninr pro~ramsorTheaseAw rd asrs aspaeatsvlsemltks VCPA SCHOLARSHIP
eolis~s p t
/-WARDS which art handled under a asparate program.
NOI,dIIdATIONS:
SstsetlobmitNd dtb no,ninationsathus it is impostsatstha! e~ek iiubenittal derei tw
n+aterials su
the aetivitiss and aeeomPlann ^snt roeass. N minatiows mar a sade li VCPA msm-
aeeerr-pliahenenta to the p t P
tress or am eitisen oI the Comneonr-salth.
ive materials ~rhich illustrate aad
Photogra~s, news clippia6s, ~ otbes suppo~velcamed. All ne-terisl subaitted
explain tt~e significance of tbA aroainse s ned fac• its files vales a specific request
will becoue the pi'~°~~ by~sel!•addressed envelope vitb adeet~~ pO6 Route 1
!or its return accompan ar 1, 1989• Hail to Jean 3egsn,
provided• ~~,~,e !or entries is 3epEemb
Boz 292-A, Ieesburg, Virginia 22dT5•
YIAGIIVIA CITIZENS P ORATION OC~TION
1~ AWARDS N Committee
Roanoke County's Landfill Citizens Advisory
1. Na>re of Nominee Carl Wright, Chairperson
(Ilndividual or Group)
p, 0, Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018
Address: phone: (7_72-2068
' i ctor of Planning, Roanoke Co.
S b ' itte r
Terrance L. Harri
2 . Name of u m
o n unx 29800 Roanoke VA 24018
AICP D re
Address _,~:
Phone: (703) 772-2068
d; CITIZEN (~1~ CITATION ~ ); YOUTH ~ )~ STUDENT ( )•
3. TYPe of Awar ,
August 30, 1989
4. Dats of Submittal. -'~- pROJECT OR EFFORT: attach
separate
S, y-~,jMMARY STATEMENT OF PROGR N ~/ OR ~pCjJMENTATION• sheets
~6• SUPPLEMENTARY IIVFORMATIO ee coo Jean Sagan, Route 1, Box 292-p-•
T. SEND TO: VCPA Award Vwom ~i5• r
Leesburg.
.. 1
M E M (~ RAND U M
T0; John Hubbard
FROM: Mary H. Allen ~ ~~llJ
DATE: October 11, 1989
SUBJECT: Landfill Citizens Advisory Committee
Hod e would like for you to make arrangements to have the
Mr. g Committee present at
members of the Landfill Citizens Advisory may be recognized for
the Board meeting on October 24th so they
the award described on the attached memorandum.
Thanks
~_t
~~33 ~ ~
BOARD READING FILE
Qat C ~ ~ ~ • X989
LG
TO: Ann Marie Fedder
Public Information Officer
FROM: Terry Harrington ~~•
Director of Planning
BLJ
SAM
HCN
DATE: October 5, 1989 RWR _______
SUBJECT: Virginia Citizens Planning Association (VCPA) Award
I was notified on Friday, September 29, that the Landfill
Citizens Advisory Committee (LCAC) was the recipient of a 1989
VCPA Award. The awards jury was particularly impressed by the
overall landfill siting process, of which LCAC was a part. In
making the award, the jury apparently indic~.ted that the Roanoke
County process was a model that would benefit other communities
in the Commonwealth.
A formal recognition dinner and award presentation will be held
at the Hotel Roanoke on Sunday, October 8, 1989. The VCPA has
invited two people associated with the LCAC to attend as their
guests. LCAC Chairman Carl Wright and Ms. B. J. Fasnacht, a
member of the committee, will be attending the presentation. I
should receive more information about the award and the
presentation this week.
Please call if you need more information.
ajb
cc:~er Hodge
Board of Supervisors