The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About10/10/1989 - RegularAT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, ON TUESDAY, OCTOBER 10, 1989 RESOLUTION 101089-1 CERTIFYING EXECUTIVE SESSION MEETING WAS HELD IN CONFORMITY WITH THE CODE OF VIRGINIA WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia has convened an executive meeting on this date pursuant to an affirmative recorded vote and in accordance with the provisions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and WHEREAS, Section 2.1-344.1 of the Code of Virginia requires a certification by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia that such executive meeting were conducted in conformity with Virginia Law. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia hereby certifies that, to the best of each members knowledge: 1. Only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements by Virginia law were discussed in the executive meeting which this certification resolution applies, and 2. Only such public business matters as were identified in the motion convening the executive meeting were heard, discussed or considered by the Board of Supervisors Of Roanoke County, Virginia. On motion of Supervisor Garrett, seconded by Supervisor Nickens and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, GArrett NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: ~~ ~_~~ Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors 10-11-89 CC: File Executive Session File C-/ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, OCTOBER 10, 1989 PROCLAMATION DECLARING THE MONTH OF OCTOBER, 1989, AS RECYCLING MONTH IN ROANORE COUNTY WHEREAS, Gerald L. Baliles, Governor of Virginia, has proclaimed the month of October, 1989, as Virginia Recycling Month, to recognize the importance of the recycling efforts of its citizens; and WHEREAS, recycling saves natural resources, energy and land, reduces littering by minimizing the amount of material improperly discarded; and WHEREAS, The Commonwealth is committed to a goal of recycling ten percent of the solid waste stream by 1991, fifteen percent by 1993, and twenty-five percent by 1995; and WHEREAS, Roanoke County was the first locality in the Commonwealth of Virginia to institute a Curbside Source Separation Recycling Program; and WHEREAS, the County's efforts have been extremely successful resulting in increased volunteer participation in community recycling programs; and WHEREAS, recycling has already reduced the waste stream in the Roanoke Valley by seven percent. THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that October, 1989, be designated as ROANORE COUNTY RECYCLING MONTH -' FURTHER, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia encourages all businesses, industries and residents to become more active in recycling and in procuring recycled products and materials. PROCLAMATION EXPRESSING APPRECIATION TO THOSE WHO WORKED TO RESTORE ELECTRICITY FOLLOWING HURRICANE HUGO WHEREAS, on Friday, September 22, 1989, at approximately 5:00 a.m., Hurricane Hugo slammed into the Roanoke area, with wind gusts up to 77 miles per hour; and WHEREAS, the resulting damage to Appalachian Power Company facilities was severe, second only to the ice storm in January, 1979: and WIiEREAS, at the height of this storm, 40,000 of APCO's 98,592 Roanoke Valley customers were without electricity, and in the Roanoke Division of Appalachian Power, a total of 64,000 customers lost power; and WHEREAS, many power lines were broken in multiple ~~, locations, making even more difficult the restoration of power to aeople served by those lines. THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED that Roanoke County expresses .ppreciation to the 368 people who worked 20,000 manhours to -estore electric service; and BE IT FURTHER PROCLAIMED that as a result of their hard irk and dedication, 75% of APCO's customers had electricity within ~ hours and 93% were restored within 48 hours. R. W. Robers, Vice Chairman ATTEST: 'r'te-,-3it. Q-~-~ Mary H. Allen, Clerk ~:; Roanoke County Board of Supervisors _~.:~~~^~~ ACTION # ITEM NUMBER '~ / AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: October 10, 1989 AGENDA ITEM: Work Session on Improvements to the stormwater Management Program COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR' S COMMENTS : ~,u,~~,Q, .moo a.ae.o-~ ~!-° ~ ~"e.~ dZ~ad'v' . BACKGROUND' At the September 12 meeting of the Board of Supervisors, the staff prepared a brief report on recommendations for a stormwater management program. One of those recommendations was to adopt amendments to the existing code to increase stormwater management requirements for new development. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The staff has prepared an outline of a complete "Drainage and stormwater Management" design standard. Several sections of these standards pertain to stormwater management for new development and are identified below: stormwater Management Requirements: This section provides for increase in detention requirements from a two-year storm to a 10-year and 50-year storm. Site Gradina• Requires site grading plans on all projects to insure proper drainage to storm water facilities. Maintenance of stormwater Mana ement Facilities: Requires maintenance agreements by Ordinance in lieu of by policy for maintenance of stormwater facilities. Staff will present at the work session detailed information on the proposed stormwater management requirements and samples of the affects of these changes. ~- ~ This amendment does not address the following: 1. Does not correct existing downstream flooding. 2. Does not address flooding conditions greater than a 50- year storm. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board hold a first reading of the Ordinance on October 10, 1989, and schedule a Public Hearing and second reading fo d ~m nt Co trol Ordinance andr then adopti n oftthe the Erosion and Se Stormwater Management Criteria. SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED: /~~~± John R. Hubbard, P.E. Elmer C. Hodge Assistant County Administrator County Administrator Community Services & Development ___________ ---------------------------- ACTION VOTE Motion by: No Yes Abs Approved ( ) Garrett Denied ( ) Johnson Received ( ) McGraw Referred Nickens to Robers ACTION # ITEM NUMBER ~ -' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: October 10, 1989 AGENDA ITEM: Work Session to Establish Drainage Maintenance Project Priorities COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND The first list of nineteen drainage maintenance projects was presented to the Board of Supervisors in February, 1988 for approval and construction. Nine additional projects were added in October, 1988. Of these original projects, twenty have been completed, three are ready for construction, and five are being pursued in terms of easement acquisition, surveying, and engineering. In addition to completing $165,000 worth of improvements on the original list, we have responded to emergency situations and were responsive to citizen complaints during the recent heavy rains and flooding conditions. Staff is now submitting projects P-29 through P-54 for suggestions, discussion and input from the Board of Supervisors (see attachment). These projects are also prioritized and recommended for approval under "New Business." The estimated cost of these additional projects is $185,000, which with the addition of the $148,000 from pending projects, will place our committed costs at $330,000. At current budget levels, the completion of these projects will be well into the next fiscal year. This cost projection is comparable to the one expressed to the Board of Supervisors in October, 1988. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION Exhibit "A", Previously Approved Projects Exhibit "B", Proposed Projects. -~ STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of drainage projects under "New Business." SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: Phillip T. Henry, P.E. Elmer C. Hodge Director of Engine ring County Administrator ------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Garrett Received ( ) Johnson Referred McGraw To Nickens Robers -~ EXHIBIT "A Previously Approved Projects ~-a MAINTENANCE PR;:!J ECTS (PRIORITIZED) P-1 . 8. !~`. mess ler 6911 Goff Road Loman Road Complete P-2. Penn Forest Christ-ian C'hurcr. Penn Forest P-3. Russell E. Taylor X824 Em~ssarv Drive Montclair P-4. Bob Hansel 4514 Hammond Lane Eton Hills P-5. Dot E-tier 3611 McDaniel Greve Andrew Lewis Place P-6. George Warner 3934 Sandpiper Greve Penn Forest. P-7. Harry i.~oin 8167 Hunter's Trail Belleview Estates P-8. N. J. Holbrook.. 314 Woodmere Gr~v~. L i n.denwood P-g, J. D. Thompson 61 ~~ La.ndfai +~ Drive Lindenwood P-1C1.Richard Smoot 1325 Vivian Avenue Gwi~ht H~lis P-11 .Stan Barnhill 3.J3.~ ~~.ingswood Drive Algoma Park. P-12.Georye Coughenhour 3819 Overbill Trail Penn Forest P-13.Lawr~ence E. Horton 3 ~ 1 0 Penn Forest Boy.) I evard Penn Forest Comte l ete i,; ,~ S t : ~ ~: , 5 t~ 0 CamK? i ete s:;t7St : $40 , JiJE~ Ready for construction C.`~st : $25 . CLOD Ne~otiatira for easement Cost : $50 , 4~EG0 Under construct?or. Cost : ~6C~ , OOU Comte l ete Cost - X20 . ~~tlu t;omta I et.e Comr? i et.e post : $3 , 0! ~0 Come, ete Cost : ~2 . OC>~~ ~,Ori?~, i ate c~n.gt : $5 , iJ00 Ready for COnS ~~rliGt. i orl Cost : X37 , C~00 Re.~dv f~~~r cnn~t.r.uct +on Cost.: $1 .5°JD 4 ~' P-14.Gene Tuttle 55~~1 Ambassador Drive Montclair P-1 5 . R. i c:har~.i L.aonev 734u Barrens Road Barrens Road P-16.Nnrman Gaic.~weli 223 Raritan Road La Bellevue Complete Cost: $5,U00 ,~omp I et.e Cost.: $1 . 5U"~ Ready for ~-onstruction Gast : $5 , Ut~O P-17.David Grosswh7te 5215 Burnt Quarter Drive Fal i inq Creel: k-::states P-18.Br~dle Lane Sugar Loaf Estates P-i9.Watkins St.agar Loaf Mount.ai n Road P-20.Jack. Browninca 2844 Embassy Drive p-L1 .!~. P. Meador 5~~ 1 6 Lamp l i gl~ter Drive P-22.Nugh We11s 363 Chaparral Drive p-23.Cheryl Beacn 5444 Lakedale Road P-24.Pauline Roberson 4314 Gresthill Drive P-25.C~eorge Billups 3w~58 Verona lra~I P-2G.Mrs. Gharies H. Glum, Jr. 5~~41 G-raun Lane p-27.Mrs. Vola Gock.ram 3549 C,ol~ny Lane p-28.Dennis Duff 5137 Waxmvrt.le Gompiete %r~St : $2 , OC~t~ t~ om~ i et.e Complete 1 '=, ~ i it i'~omo f ete E:nc?ineerina and surveying ~,nderwav Camglete Ready for construction CompEete ender constr•uct~on ~::OSt : $. . 50[i Comoiete Ready for construction i:~ost.: $~~ . 5t~~~_~ 5 ~! EXHIBIT "B" Proposed Projects ~' MAINTENANCE PROJECTS (PRIORITIZED) p-29 . Nelms Lane (Board Resolution Nov. , '88 ) St. Rte. #840 North County DESCRIPTION: install storm sewervs~stem d Roanoke City to ESTIMATED COST: 561,000 MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Hollins P-30. John D. Kelly (RFA 88E125) 942 Starmount Avenue (Settlement) Starmount DESCRIPTION: stormesewerquchannel~improvementsn of 125' of ESTIMATED COST: 512,500 MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Catawba p-31. Lynn Kirk (RFA 89E310) 4704 Whipplewood Drive Branderwood DESCRIPTION: Remove silt from pipe inlet and stabilize channel ESTIMATED COST: 3500 MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Cave Spring P-32. Bobby Joe Hogan (RFA 89E399) 2814 Embassy Circle Thomas E. Chocklett (RFA 89E401) 2820 Embassy Circle Roy Kendrick (RFA 89E326) 2831 Embassy Drive Montclair Estates DESCRIPTION: Channel improvements ESTIMATED COST: 520,000 7 ~! MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Catawba P-33. Raymond Hodges (RFA 88E228) 509 Palisades Drive Lindenwood DESCRIPTION: Storm sewer rehabilitation - upgrade inadequate pipe ESTIMATED COST: $10,000 MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Vinton P-34. Palm Valley/Sun Palley (Request from Board) DESCRIPTION: Channel improvements, additional flume baffling ESTIMATED COST: $25,000 MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Hollins P-35. Dick Simpson (RFA 89E368) 5332 Cave Spring Lane Harold Butler (RFA 88E162) 5326 Cave Spring Lane Nottingham Hills DESCRIPTION: Repair blocked storm sewer and stabilize inlet ESTIMATED COST: $4,000 MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Cave Spring P-36. J. D. Porter (RFA 89E390) 2745 Tanglewood Drive Meadowlark DESCRIPTION: Install rip-rap in drainage channel ESTIMATED COST: $1,500 MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Cave Spring 8 ~~ P-37. John Glovier (RFA 89E316) 4620 Vest Drive Eton Hills DESCRIPTION: Extend storm drain to low point within the drainage easement ESTIMATED COST: 31,500 MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Cave Spring P-38. Ron Callahan (RFA 89E330) 5138 Springlawn Avenue Springlawn DESCRIPTION: Storm sewer rehabilitation ESTIMATED COST: 36,000 MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Cave Spring P-39. Kim Hagood (RFA 88E222) 2938 Merino Drive Castle Rock Farms DESCRIPTION: Repair damaged junction box and stabilize channel ESTIMATED COST: 32,500 MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Windsor Hills P-40. Thomas L. Wright (RFA 89E235) 2737 Tully Drive Glen Cove DESCRIPTION: Rehabilitation of existing storm sewer ESTIMATED COST: 35,000 MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Catawba p-41. William T. Andrews (RFA 88E192) 5702 Pine Acres Lane Pine Acres DESCRIPTION: Grade and reshape drainage ditch ESTIMATED COST: 31,000 9 a ~_a MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Cave Spring P-42. Samuel Irvin (RFA 89E247) 4124 Eagle Circle Penn Forest DESCRIPTION: Channel reconstruction and stabilization ESTIMATED COST: $1,500 MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Cave Spring p-43. David Smith (RFA 89E249) 1446 Freeborn Circle Hamden H i 11 s DESCRIPTION: Repair broken storm sewer in drainage easement ESTIMATED COST: 31,000 MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Vinton P-44. Donald Obenchain (RFA 89E250) 3743 Colonial Avenue Colonial Heights DESCRIPTION: Reconstruct drainage ditch ESTIMATED COST: 3500 MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Cave Spring P-45. Glen Unroe (RFA 89E253) 4101 Arlington Hills Drive Arlington Hills DESCRIPTION: Channel improvements ESTIMATED COST: 3500 MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Cave Spring p-46. Howard Boblett (RFA 89E264) 5443 Chatsworth Drive Mount Vernon Forest DESCRIPTION: Stabilize channel, rip-rap pipe outlet. ]0 ~_ ESTIMATED COST: 51,500 MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Windsor Hills (RFA 89E279) p-47. Lawrence Morgan 4956 Wing Commander Drive Nichols Estates DESCRIPTION: Construct drainage channel ESTIMATED COST: 52,000 MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Windsor Hills (RFA 89E293) p-48, Walter E. Stokley 7887 Enon Drive North Burlington DESCRIPTION: Construct adequate drainage ditch ESTIMATED COST: 53,000 MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Hollins (RFA 89E299) P-49. Ralph Horne 1112 East Drive Dillard Court DESCRIPTION: Channel improvements ESTIMATED COST: 51,500 MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Hollins (RFA 89E344) p-50. John W. Vaughn 4443 Wyndale Avenue Wyndale DESCRIPTION: Grade and shape ditch from pipe outlet to existing ditch ESTIMATED COST: 51,500 MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Windsor Hills P-51. Gary Smith (RFA 89E383) 1160 Vivian Avenue Dwight Hills DESCRIPTION: Channel improvements ESTIMATED COST: 65,000 MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Catawba P-52. Steven 8ratcher (RFA 89E393) 5402 Green Meadow Road Farmington Lake DESCRIPTION: Stabilization within drainage easement ESTIMATED COST: 5500 MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Windsor Hills P-53. John Eades (RFA 89E415) 4306 Fontaine Orive Cresthill DESCRIPTION: Acquire easement and construct swale from VDOT R/Way ESTIMATED COST: 56,000 MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Windsor Hills P-54. Richard Ferguson (RFA 89E417) 5053 Balsam Drive Belle Meade DESCRIPTION: Joint project with VDOT and property owner to install drop inlet and storm sewer ESTIMATED COST: 510,000 MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Cave Spring 12 . ~.. -.e ~rl. ~ \A C~•, ,,,. ~ .}~1.. d ,~ j r+_:; • ' -t. v' N ~ ` _ ~ ~ ~ %~~ppfhlM ~ ~ ~y `f -- ~~~ ~ -` •• R ~ h .~... =-~1+ '~-~. ~- NORTB .~..... ~~~ NORTS M K w ~ r • 2S ~Da v w is 27 ~'s 2A +~ ~ r. +~ ,de.` mod 29 ~j ~ N ,~' ~ ~' N V~goO~ ~t s ~ 3 ~ iM~ a r 20 21 260tk . •19 a,~ » ~1 r f ~ +4 ~ ~. x ~ 'c i8 ~. •, ~ :i 32 ~~ ~ • N ~ ~'i : ~ ~1r~ 13 •~ t !7 . j. 33 ''r t ~ }~ >P ~~ 3 ~ . ' IS ,, ' , 'b . 34 ~r ~ 16 ''V. ~ i' • i2 +, 9 O r - *.. a .'. . 3S ~~ '., r ~~ I~ f e ,. ~ 4s. ~ t0 O M ~~. * ~ 6 '4. C1r'~ r ., ;, • ,o , 9 ~ c µ. .,~ ~ ~ ~ t 47 . !Ii . U - ~ V~ / ~ h ~ »r . ., ZO 4 Mt,r r / ~ ,r srr / ~~r 2 ~ / 2 ~, ~ / sro 3 3 `eo K~ 4 ~ f ~; /• O ttu ~ i j / O ~~ • S rs ~ i o~ ~yV r / e ~ ~~ / tw 7 ar r ~ f e ~ ,~' : .i ~9'• 4 s Z 'O~. • ; roof t-tr y ~ ; ' .,\; rorr r a . / 9 . 46 .. ''~,~ • .b ~ . ~ ~~ loot t0 ee t i Coro i " ~rj ? r• '• ~; 4s ..49 ~ ~ S ~ ~, it J rSt~ ^Ore ~OSr orro ~ ~.J cool I ~~ 4 ~ ~ `, t ~ ~ . ~'~ .'~ 9 ;~ ~~ •? • Toro . S 695 cos ;.. S2 ~ M ~ 4; ' ors a, ~ .~ ws :/ .aw' ~iD~c ssu S3 2 b;; ~~ ~o~s roar ~ .o~s.• '• r 6 / ~ . ~ ~. . /A,i~` 'got \ a io~ti ' ~ io~• 6\~ ~ ' \ ` 243 \\~ i i COMMUNITY SERVICES John D . K e 11 y AIVDDBVBIAPMENT 942 Starmount Avenue 14 Starmount P-3U J ' ~ I 117 /' AnrwG .:. wrnr' :~:a:; ;`til ~, _ , ~ ~ f~: 1 `~ ° s ~2- . ~ `tea. `~, :.~ ~ t i ~ ' ~ + ~ d ~''`~ .. \ r ~l INITY MAP r ~- NORTB 32 ~'' 1~ • ~ R Y*11 M L a ., *, . ~ ~ ~ti ~ „ r t n `~ `. b y 2~ .~ u` c -. cab of . N ~ ~ ~ .~ .¢ y+ Sfl ~ Q ~• V• 1• • ~ A i f J ~ ' 6 ~' 10 fo : SS ,, S S6 d~ . ~~ ~. y ~ ~ ~ '~, ~ r 4 a 19 • 29 e L ^' '•`t0 t a •, 34 y ~, ~. .. '' c ' ~ . ~. f21 ~ '27 •s M+ . w n ` ~ , a ~ ~ , ~ ~J rr •' 26 ~ + ~ '~ J t~•. 3 ^ »„ ~ ~ x.123 ` i 2: `:S t/I' ~ t/la ~ j ~ . N t j rP>>'~ ', v. 3fl ~ . ! , M J IS• , -.~ 17 / •'~ ~ a ° t1~• , ' I' 13 fO~ J'Ij~ ` \ +~ / 29 r. by ~~1 r t~l~ r s~o 1 ~ ~ ~~; 12 ~ r+ra ~~ 6J ~ 26' / % \~` +• ~ ~'~~ ~' ~ ,y= 1 i6 ~ a ~ K ~l ~ 11 ti_ :~~• yr ` = ~ ~' ..27 ~ ~ fy,'' • / r 4 s, / ~ ~ y 9 ~ ti. 9 ~ 3~ ~: v , ~ 3 •\ +, ti '~ 23 ~ ` : ~ ~ `~ ~ 6 ` ~ +Oa ~~ ..rte ~ ` ~ 1 g ~ •• ~ ~/ ~ 4 .l ~a ~ - ~ 4p tort ,~•- ti ~ - ~ ~;~. ~ ti 3 ~ 2 . 39 ~, ~~ •~ 43 yrs "'.~ f o e ~~~ X26 ~~. ' . I 1 ~ b ~' af' ~'__- a4 ~ , 4s • g~ 4I•' t QI'OP " 6 , \ •1 ' / 3e q, airs 1 sir. , ~ X23 a i~ ••. .. rr. ~ ;' • r'.' ~~;\ v. .. e . ° ~ .. ~, -. 2 ~ •t w~, • v r .. • ~' 37 WOypNfR ~f Rf 1712 r i ~ y"~~ ~'. 36 •'~ , sow so 5Z ~ _~ srt ai.~ r ~' \ ~' ~,, j A 49 .~4\ COMMUNITYSBRVICBS Bobby Joe Hogan 2814 Embassy Circle ANDDBVIsLOPMBNT Montclair Estates P-32 16 ~~~ NORTB _ ~~.: ~ _ • .. ~ ~; T _ .,- 4 ~ i ~ . ~:, ~~ g , S ~ }-- PMsoaw` a: -- Rt 1013 ~ , ~ - f i . r ~ ~ _ O -- ~~~, p ~~ ' b ! ~ pt ~ . 6 6 ` p ` ~• . ~ ` ' -- pwonsti.. -'~ --~ to 13 2 ~ ~ s q ~ , u .~ 3 ' 17 t ~. 3 22 ~ . iJS a~~ sat 16 ' ' a ~` 3 ' ~ 13 Mt asi . o • ~ `J ~ .o • ~t ~ 771 !!O • 2~ 4 ~•~ ` ~ ~ • lp~i~~~t OU 1 ~ 1.07 At ~ IS ' 17 14 ~ ` ~ ~ ~~ 9~ Se9 ~ v ~ )f0 ~~ , ' ~ a et 1032 ,,, ~ ~ ~ s o ooaa~K ~, ; , ~ ~ asr ~ 2s 1 ~ _ ~f ~ its ~ 23 .. Raymond Hodges COMMUNI7YSBRYICBS 509 Palisades Drive AND DBVBLOPMBNT L i n d e nw o o d P- 3 3 17 ~o i VICINITY MAP ..,./"° NORTB COMMUNITYSERVICSS Palmer Valley/Sun Valley AND DBVELOPMBNT i 8 P- 3 4 ~. 1 NORTB _~ as oo .a, is •• a ~ . ~ ••. .__ ~~ ~~ ~~ 9 ~~ fsr: y•f !~. . : 8 7 .9 ~! ~ . . s,lts Ara^ 6 0 17 E N r ~ fv ~ ' ~ ~ ~? ~'' ~ •s io ~ 19 20 21 22 far/ sass 'sacs !aD ' u .,~, .,„ ~• . ~ S 23 - r g 2! _ 1 f, , • Cor• .~„ ~~ . • ,..,. "~ leM ~ 9 J SlrO alO1~ • . ' ~ ' f ~ d ~ s~ ~ a7~ i[!T ~ S ~ ~ 3 . , ss+v , ' ~ s aaen a•.~ ssro ~t ~ . ~ f S ~O .i ~ f S a!!f IS ty° ~,~ ip~ •• • .~. •e+ -~ • ° • tf •' f t '' '' H '~'' 16 4 ~ ' Sa 3i k ~ .-M ~ 2 ,~ ` ~~ 17 ~ ~ _ •c /~ .~ latt ~ Y ~ N:• G ~~ a ti : \ ~ :~ ~ ; ~ N w ~ • f ~ 11 4C ss! ,,•s ~ i A ZB III ( • s~ 22 ~ ~ las+ ., ys, 1 0 .O _ \ It ti't• sab ' t 26 43 4S - 3 ~- "!! s!a 21 _ ~ ~ , 23~ ~ ~ ~ _ !fir' ~ Slf1 ~'~. 21 ? o S7 ~ \ r ~ ~ . .. ~ • ,, f i f 19 v ~" J L -- Dick Simpson COMMUNITYSERVICBS 5332 Cave spring Lane AND DSV&LOPMBNT Nottingham H i 11 s P- 3 S 19 ~1 -a ~~- NORTB ~~ J. D. Porter COMMUNITYSERYICES 2745 Tanglewood Drive ii AND DEVELOPMENT Meadowlark P - 3 6 20 ~-a ~- NORT~I .~ ~~ - - / ~'o ~•, -tea 'J~s .1j1 , • 3a ~r.e .~' ~ .~ TTOrI ' ~JlI7 ~. ~ .~ ~~ 24 , O .. ~ ~ I ~ 31 /~ 2/ 2S v. ~ ' Kati ~ .\ ,• ~ 1101 ~ i ~. .~ % ~ 26 ,JtI \ • 'i 27 • ~ . 12 I '30 ~ ~ 28 ~ ~ J) • ~~•j I ..,} 1 •.lJJ . ~ 11 ' 32 ~ %I ,. 29 ~• s. - ,'~ 28 ~. r g ~~ v.r. ~~ IS o ."' - .s ..lJ . ,• :.. v ,r/ 5 r ... . .so .lv,. '3 ..,~' • ~ I ~ _ ~2 _~ ` j ~' a.~y j. I aS i yi ~ ~ i ,~ ' _ ~ I ., - ~ axle \• I s E" 4 ~ .E / sc~ •~ 7 j. ~ i5 ,~ 20 • ~ ~ ,~ • 6 ab ~ \ E .. I / 2~ • ~ \ ae' ~ ~l~~ I 1 ' _- 3 06~~ 1 .gl9~ ~~ "•~~ 1Z~ ~~~! / '\ ~ / John Glovier COMMUNITY SERVICES 4 6 2 0 vest D r i v e AND DBVBLOPMENT Eton H i 11 s P- 3~ ~~ 21 COMMUNITY SERVICB,S Ron C a 11 a h a n ANDDBVBLOPMBNT S 138 Springlawn Avenue Springlawn P-38 ~~ - ~ ~'~ NORT~I ~ ~ 2 - ~ ts~t' ./ s4ro~ sm ~ ,, 39 i ` _ ~'• ~ 3 ` use /` uN 4 y ~ ` •„~ ~ ~ ux ~: ' a '. , ~ '. / 23 • slss ~+ .. z9 ~ w. ", 9 .• 6 ~ : tlst i / - ~l111 • ~ 8 • , ~ '• ~ ~'~ tfil •.. S ' e ~• ~ siso ~ ~~ " 'a'te ~ ~ i / 21~ /u01 5 ., N ~I C ° I~tfi~ t I ,,, ...,~. :y .S ~. / •,'' " M uos „ / . - _ i un '~ ~ - '• ~tl01 ! ts"t I ~ uts ~ / ~7 ~ / r !r 2S tst0 t • i• ~ 7~ ~ ' i 24 ut1 .. tsss % ~ / ts~s x I ~ ~ 23 i ua u ~ ,. ~ . ' 20 l ~ use ` ras Ss ~' ~ Oan~» ~ ts11 ~/ g ~_ l ._ ~ . ~ ~ ' t~7 `! ~ Ong , I / tfsl •. u"" f 4 1 d . r ~~ > " t!"! •... !IQ y ~; ~ ~--. • ~~ Isis _ ~ d \~. =• 4 ~2 37t7 ~r" ;..ti- I!s" / tilt S~ ~\ - ~ , 41 .Jf ~ - .. ,~ ~ --_ , . t,S71s ~Q ~ •' w / I t7sl 9 / ~ - 8 Ils0 .~ I ~ 4j . NO!- 17"! r ~" _ ~ 49 - ~ 43 ~ _ I s711 p, ;` l~ ~ ` ~ ...h 0~ ,, I t s7ss ib ~-J I f ~48 44 ~ 1 ~ s7ts ~~ ~~ Isis 22 :. ' I r~~-~ 17t0 ie pp ~. ~ ~ ~' - ~ Nt1 ,I ~--_ snt ~Of," i 4S ~~ I ~ 2S s 24 sst7 ~J'~ .~ ~+ , •... ~ ~~1 soos 4~ ~ 2i S~_//)i J _s71s ~ ; s7r, ( ~! ~ v 46 - ~',.110~ - ~ f l ~ 2i ssri! r F as .. 20 / `~ _ 0i r.• I ' ~ i9 17 ~, ~ ItlO SN Mo0 X603 .~ ` ..~ r.•• ~~.. ~ :. Kim Hagood COMMUNITY SERVICES 2 9 3 8 Merino D r i v e AND DEVELOPMENT 23s t 1 e Rock Farms P-39 ~~ NORTS ~~ ~ b ` y7 ~, ,~ 8 .. ~ 'i \ ~- 9 ~ ~ 6 ~ i~~M q » j' 't. ~3 ~ yid 5 • l4 • 1•N ~ ~ : s • '` Q b y •j • M M. ~ ~r ~n ' 1 `~ y A `.•• ' ~ • ~ 1{2.000 v .c ~ ~` 1°a " 4 J 2 •~,~ ~ IS • ~i~Ij 1 • ~ ~~ I ~ /..~ ~ ~ 1• '0 y~ ~ i1 ~ J a/ e .~ e. ,~ X17 ~ ~ 3 ~ j~..~ ~+'r i, 'may r • • ~ / ' ~ ` ~-~ • ~ • r • r r~o- \ J / I .- '~ J r 1 J ~ ZI ~~' l . • •• r R~ia Cn+• ; ' ~ (IV ~' 23 1 s 11 ' ~ •" ~.• 2< er erne•re ~ '. •i \ :964... 3, \ ~ ~ !~ ~ ~ i ' X541.. ` g r ~ ~ \ t x ~. `,l •~ 29 ~ ~ ~ / ~ \ ~, a i ~ ~ D 2.- ~ _% ~ • ',•, ~~ i e~ e• 0p ~, 31 ~. v P` •, e'' `~ • ..\'1 ~~ v 2S \ \ .ss~ ~ COMMUNITY SBRVICBS Thomas L. W r i g h t AND DBVBLOPMl4NT 2 7 3 7 T u 11 y D r i v e Glen Cove P-40 24 - - ~~ NORTH ~~ - •~ i ~ ~ i7 ' +~Is •s ~ , , y . ~ ~^s , ' 4 4.,13 ~ L ' >. ~~ Ktn+K~ Trod 3 ~~IS s 18 ~~ ~, ,. ~ ~. ~' 1 y , ~ ,~, y r. ~ 1 1 2 ~~ ! i q •c ~i k .• ~~ ~ '' r \ ~' Y 2a 1 J • ~~ D ~ • •, ., .~ ~TT~ - 12 1~ ro r. ,:~ .o of • ~ •" ~~ +~ f, ,. S ~~ . f:. N ~~ r g 6 ~ '~6 23 . ~ ; ~ ~~ ~~. mot' a ~~ 22 :. e 1 ~ 3 ,RRI • `~ / 2 '1 ..~r •~ ~ ~ ~• 21 ' tl ' •, 2 ~. ~s \ ~ •. :i .~ .. ~3 4 ~/ I ~- ^ 19 j /1 ' -~ .. / '~1 ~ / / s ~ ~ S S ,1 1 . -• ~ ' •• / j/ ~~ ^ 19 ' 27 .c ~ o=\ i ~ / l ` ~wJ'~i, ` , `I , wk 16 ~ ~~~ i J / / • IS ' ~ •, f 1 COMMUNI?Y SBRVICl3S S a m u e l I r v i n 4124 Eagle Circle ANDDBV&LOPMF.NT Penn Forest P-42 26 • - -- - - Mme" •. _ ~., .xl' ~.. ~ .. ; .~ O r./ Q 4 ~ /ri / 1 • 0~ i 2 ~ _~ / .~ ,mot T .. / _ _ ~ g ~Ll .•~• ~ ... ~" VICINIT 1' MAP ~.... ~>-~' x _ :i:rns • NORTB ..~~.. COMMUNI77Sl:KY/GL~J 1446 Freeborn Circle AND DBVBLOPMBNT x amd e n x i 11 s 27 P-43 ~v M.:41+ ~t Z a ~ . MS R •!L•: rr _p `~~ `y ,, C ~ ,.' `N~ . r ;:r " . e~ti ~ . ~.~ w ~ r ~ VICINITY MAP ~ °o~ ` ~ mot. `~-~ -C! NORTB / ... ~ 3 ~',6JSJ ` \' ~ ~4 / ( ~~ S J~o p ~, i ~ ~ \ t ~ g 2 / ' ~ / 10 / 22 ~~ \ ~ l / ~ ~~~ C .~ 24 \~ ~ jl e\\, `~ ~ ` % 0 ` 1',' G~`ol, '~,6 '~ ~ 4 • e~ti 31 '2S " ''~ '• ~ ~ ''•` J~~ a a. •/ 28 ~/ ~ ~ ~ / ~1~~ / ~t• J4 • ' 1 `• 31 J J •, ,~I ' SS 3g0~i' '~ \ \ / Sj o. ~ ~ .'J ~J a •~ ~s / \ • a 2'~ ~ ,~~ . ... ~e a . ~. _3' COMMUNITY SERVICES Donald O b e n c h a i n 3743 Colonial Avenue AND DEVELOPMENT Colonial Heights P-44 28 _ ~ u T ra .na. ~-~ Q NORTB ~~ ~~n . ~ c°~ r' y 1 • s r S~ 2 3 19 D„ r r • ~ ~ ~ 6 24 '•r 1 ~ > c 9 .~ e ~ 18 ~ ~ i ~> 2 S • 7 .. > ssd , -rte, ~,r 3 ~ .o~ ~•~°~ ~e .~ ~~ • r .~ 27 • .~ ~ 1•~ S. 'S • ' \ .•/ ; •/2 ~' i ., ` Imo'/ i. i `r y i" A ~ ~• L ii w ' ~~~((( ;, / ~ . ~ %' ' , . ~. .. 4. R • \ '~ ~ ~ . r'~. w 4 ,• , ±f • , •• " • ~ S~ 'o T~ ~\ _t `.a 1 y `. ~ _ ~h ~r ~ ` \ j • •• / IN •'.~\ ~ .~~ ":. COMMUNITY SERVICBS AND DBVBLOPMBNT Glen Unroe 4101 Arlington Hills Drive Arlington Hills ~a ~~ ~_'~~ e ~ , y~~ .~ a~ X66' '" P-45 ~-a -Q NORTB Is „ .,, ~~ 41 • ~ ~ 3• l 23K O 9 • fsOS ~st10 ~ ~ ~' o • 120sc / ~ ~ . 3S ~ • ~~~~ ~ y: 3s ss~ a / ~ tee= ~1 9r' a, 37 ~ sst~ 14 •' 9~ s•to a r• 10.1 r'' titi ~1 •'e ~~ lssJ ~• ~ ~ 43 ci~ ~y s /~ RCOS sal ~,A s7s ~ ~~ ~ f' ~ ~' ~ ~ /~ i N•, 12 44 'ee. . _ _~ ~ ~ ~ i esl7 ~ ~' .5., 11 ~~ III • r . r, ~` ,' ` '• 47 : ~~pp '~'c4 I ~ ' O/t/~~C / r ~ ~ C•yj~oi o ' S •ef ~ ' ~i:•c a ~'`\f~\ CI `~` e 9 1,,~ ,, ~~~ I 2 \ ~'P.a \er ~ ~ / 76»c l01 ` ` . ~ J/ a ZB sc lCl •~ ~ / / • 4~ e \ ip0~c a e S? 2 '~ pp11s e ~ /. ~~ m e ~ ~ ~, we ~ a o 610sc - ` ~~ 61 ' 2S•~ ./ l "~' / / ~/ ~ :~ ~ ~. ,~ /, - .p.---- b~ _~.------ ~,. -~ ..,,~ ! N . - VICINITY bIAP ~ ~ #~ J -D-~ . ~! NORT~i 1 ~a.~ i.~ y°~ c, ~ F/ i // // %%I .._ . y~N \ .i ~ / '' ' :.Jr1 )tr.n~ BOM~~~ C~r~'~ ~ q~ 6B9 2 ~ •~ o. ~ S y,•~ 1 1 .6 .:. 1 ~ ~ _ ~~ 1, , ~ `h a q/ w ti i C/ C /~ ~ . , ~ a ...,'1 ~.- , „~. , ..,... ., D ~ ~~ ~ ~ s ~ a -~ ~, , y _ 3_ _ .` J ' ~l ~ r _ i D~ • C i O Lawrence Morgan COMMUNIT'ySERVICSS 4956 Wing Commander Drive AND DBVBLOPMBNT N31c h o t s Estate s P-47 ~-~ Q NORTB ~+~' ,.a ' ? O /^~ \ ~ \\\ 3 • ` '/?0c ~pf f ~ ~/ ~ ,®%// ~_ n ~~ P/O i8t8•i•~ 1`• 10(7 ~S ~6.~ i ~ A L• ~ 2 X0+4 ,~ ~~~ ~ . 3 ~ • ~ /~ i ~~• ,~ ' i '~ \ / ~.. V '• ~ ~ .~~_ \ •~ •\ F . ~ ` o~ \ •S• F 1 ` 7 •~IJ`1.\ t \9• ~ 3 ; . -,~, ~~, ~ °s •• ~ `. •~ ~~ o. ~ `~ 99~ac ` - -. \ - _ .\ ~\ ~ ~ COMMUNITY SSRVICSS AND DBVBLOPMBNT Walter E. Stokley 7887 Enon Drive North Burlington 32 P-48 . ~ Rocs ~~ r~^ f ~' ' i• p ~~/ R16~CNY '•ti •" Cpuf11 ~ ~~ a 37 , 1~8 ' 39 Ifoi ~/^, 4V r ~ ~ Y 11.11 Ills hN • , ~ "- 10• r• ~, ~ 1011 ~ r. , j .~ M 1, 000 • K .1 • • ~ / loss ~ _ ~ 33 , low •• y 26 •' ,27 ••r ~ 3 - s~ii t ~ ~ 2S , s s '~ r,s ~~ NORTI~ Ills • s i . , ~~ J hsrf ", ~;~ .4 ~ _ ~ , s ' ! ! r ~ Iqf t : ' 31 22 , • 23 ~ 20 ~ 21 . i 19 : / ``' .~ d Lof ~ ,i»s r + Bros '• fra 4 tsli•i s a 7ndp11 n n •• sr ~ ~ d !sf '. 4 • ~~ 4 Y1. •, ' ~g{~ ~j ~ fill ~~ r'•• ,f t 1 BYC~kY10-10T M y '•~ ' s 7 ~•. M .,~ ~ ~ •7 , ~ 77 s• • slfi !)i0 p ~ 48 d f170 ` •'\ J7f1 S3 !1!I f sr p r 3 / • AN ,~ 'r• N O s9 • f Y •~ Aa tao . st O ,. ~• . ~ 6 ., ,, , .r ~ T • M M•• y _ ' ~••• , ~,IM M •,Y K N Md •o N} •f • p ~ t .•t 1 • ~. ,yam 73 ' 1 '~ ~ 8t 83 82 ~ 81 80 79 78 file! 77 ~ is ~ ~ _ ~ r, T ' • ' ~ r ~ site lilt Jrll 6 ait~ ~ llii .• ,. ~tl i ~' !ia ~ ,. . ~ . 1• 39 .~ 60 + - 61 x.'62 . ) ~ 63 •, 64 ~ 6d 1 66 S 67 `; 1 ~ llll ~ l sT~l rr q 3 ~ i >/ f' JtK j, SI10 ~ , i0 !Jiff ~~ ~ l I li/I JIDI • G J lli0 ~ ~ .o • I I ~ • f ~ .• .r _ ~ r. .+ ~ t ~. ~ ~ ~:•. •1 39 r', 1 I ;/ .'• .f 36 ~ . i 4 ? / •. ~t I ~~ ~ S6 42 t i 4 f ~~ : , f:si. ~ ~a •JSat C~~MU1V1~y$$RVICB.S John W. Vaughn nue A l ve e 4443 Wynda AND D$VBLOPMBNT W~ n d a l e P- 5 0 ~ y, ~ 1010 35 421x11 y ~ ,4 1 ~ 4~~ r~ ~-a NORTH .. . ire 'i' ,..: - , , •: _ • ,..:{.• :: ~ ..r . i' , '~. " ~`' `. '` /:•' '~ ,ice. ~~ 0 - _ - `ems ~ - ? b ~'r 8 ~ ~ sp~I M _ ~ • 11 pow ~~+ ` • ~ •, at • K / ` ejI a I ~ ~~ 4 t3 ~. • ' 13 i ly •+ ~°~ 5 1~ .• •p / ~ • 10 ~0 ` 17 ~ / ~''y a ` \ ~ • ~ O` »ir •• ul~ r q ~~ `O e • ~ ~. ~ 3 ` IQ ` 9 ~y Nor / Amont •.~' N r ` e ` ,yy / ~~• ti ~~~ NSI 2 ~ ~ 6 ~ 11 • • 1 • 18 19 ~ \ .. ., r~ lT,. O •~ ~ _ ~ st ~ ' e' •a s. •, a.., ,• ... •••. ~~ . r r • /•~ 5 •• ~ . N 2 1 •o ~~~~. `~ O,SO~ 26 •~ ~~'1 ` 1•' '• ~ `` 0 3 a~¢ • ••• 31 30 ,_~ s 28 $ zs p . 2s ~+~~ '' ' ~' ~ ~ L ee~' ~ • ~:~ 31 `t! ^ , tp ~ ~ • P . ~• • O , CIO ~L a •. • o~ .e. ~ Gary Smith COMMUNITY SERVICES 1160 Vivian Avenue AND DBVBLOPMENT Dwight x i 11 s 35 P-51 ~-a -~- NORTB • s~ • • ~so~. . . • •' r +. - _ . .; It i ~ ~ ,• ~J a •..4` til ~ O 3. a r , wa : . ~, • w ~ ~Jl ~ ~ 1, i ,,~~~ Jyt ~ lill• 19 ': ltlf 2 ~ ~ llrl ~ ~ t'~o . ,.o ~ 236 k '~ • 1 2 ~...~ 1 / ~ ~~..~ ~ 17 Jiff ` 1 i ~ / i . 2• Jim jai 16 .! 17 \ 1 '° ~ p ~ sg18 J/aJ AI ,' ZD ,~ ~ J/ft ~ ~ \ ~ J S ~ ?/ ~ • 61 !i 21 ~~ ..-..... , i ~_~ dos /~ wti. s,~~ S' ~ ~ ~ ~ • :~ 21 ' ~ o '' ~ ~ ~~' "~ 24 23 ~ I , ~ / ~'ri ~ J.oJ I' 2. - ~ 28 .a •• O= ~ ~~ 12 ~ ~ , s ~3 lJJ~ . +s/~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ • ` erf i6 ~ / tlti ' ~n v J3 t. '',, , ,,. ' .. cj 8 s+'O ,~.~ • ~~~ ~. 1 ~ ' ,' ~ l,+~ If. ~ ' I •• / 7 ~ • JJJf JJl, ~ JJtO °' , , - I ' 'f . .~ q ~ `. 6 ~ u't ' JJO ~ ' j ~ ~S ~ 'i ~ ~ , 4 ; 3 I ~ .. Y j y ~ i • •f J.,, J.J, ~ ~ J.ts ,, .,, 3 i ` • 7 ~ , ~ ` 1 • ~ 1 ~ J,) ~ ~ ' 17 ~ 'f 111 J s ~\ ~ _ 6 •~( Y ~~ lak•rpn4 ~-... 2G ~ ,, s i f 21 I ~ tsn Js.r ~ . ssos ~ ~ • • o~ ~ c r u ~ F 24 ., ~ ,•. ,. ~ 0, sJta un 5 u,~ :JOB """~ ~ c302 -~•-- / ~~ •• ~ ; ~ . iy .~l ,~ • ~ _ .~ `', M ~ ' , ~ /. 4 ` 1` n. stRti COMMUNITY SERVICES AND DEVELOPMENT Steven Bratcher 5402 Green Meadow Road Farmington Lake P-52 ~-a -Q- NORTH •.r ., ~ , ~ . ~tor -- - - `~ 2S 26 ~ ` ~ .di, ~_ r se " ~ s ~ ~ .os ~ 1 t ,,. ~ ` /N r a .~~ ...• rr ~ ~ ~ J ~ ~ ~ JfOf liOl l I • r »w ••~N ~• ~r J ~ 6 ti • w IJOJr ,8 u~i ~; IS ~ y , ~ ~.sef , I .. i ..: .a ; ~ ~ ~ ~ asst ~ C oall ~ ~' ~ r• : • " ~ ~JrJ, p~ r 'P c 11 ~ ~ ;.a ~3 24 - :_ 23 it u a~~ ~' ~ h v •~ „or .-1J_0~. ' ~JO1 t2 .o . ? pJf \i a?6 IJ{I ~ IJif '/ 21 s b _, 1 - , 30s 7 2T , .. ~. ~ ? ~s~4 - ~ 19 ~.trt • , r seof ~ r ~~ ~ • a ' ` . J90. ~ . ~r' ~ IJIf aJf I 36 ~ I.uJ ~ / ~ r ~ .~/ ~ 3~ ~ as ~ .~ / 3T ? ~srs ~ ~ ua 1. ~~ ~~• y/ at>ti t ~ as .r ° w Q w~ 39' 1; IJM ~ ti IS ~O : / . ss arsf ~, vso ~~ ~.. \, S3 o~ Q r~;•. 'ut• ~~ : r~ tlrt ~ 40 t f / ~ SS , ~ ; ; ~~ !t •b 41 ~ / "~.~ . / sl ~ f J J ~ ! .: . . 1~N/ S ~~. ~ IJff, ~s ~~~ • ~ ~. ~ - ~ r. ! tJir ti 67 .~ Se '• ~~,~ so ~ d s2 63 ~~ ~ urs ~ N `~ aw "i j ssit uu as>• ; ! asts ~ uh ~ i uos - ~TK I ~ ' I I QOt fStf ~ IJ70 ~j C ` ~/~ ! ~ I ' ' a.~ r ~ ~ 2~ ~g4~~25-%Li~ 25 .1 •Ja /~° ~ I ~ ppp~ w .. 1 ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~•• bra ` / ~ 1•. •- COMMUNITY SERVICES AND DBVBLOPMENT John Eades 4306 Fontaine Drive Cresthill 37 P-53 ~' NORTB ,/ , Lei . r'' S6 S7 le 38 .y 1 .~ ~~ !!a .. •~ ~. t ! + ''N ,ts 1jj0 ~~ l ~ - .. ~~~ Itt ~ ' ,~• . • •~ .~ ~IlOfi4o ~. •~~;•• •~ a~ ~ , !ate S2 ~ S3 S4 ~ ' ~~ `~ ~r i .~•+ '~ a ` "! 79 r' ` 4as~ !b~ .tit -3. .E,~ ~ ~+ S 7 f - t ~ 6 laal , r eZjaao • ; I' r L . 1 +s3 .. `O ,+i,a !af • ,83'lasa` Sp . 48 ~ 1. '~ 57 ' asa SI +. I ~ !at .73 . .. •Satt ` 1 4S s ;6 ~• II• ~ 3fiylt! ~ ~~' 1 ;at• °o0 74 ~ ~ ~a~s ~ 43 a 1~ 4t ~ o i ~- 37 a 1; • ~ Sao ~ ! a ~~', I 46 ~ S•i!'~ ~ ' ` ~a17~4 '!a~! Sai3 ?~ ey ~0 42 • \ 4 • "'~ 3~ai! , ~ 29 14Sa~a ` 72 ' ~ ` laos~_4f'" 47 ~ ` SETS ' ~~ ~ . O , ~.` ~~3' I ~~- sso~ SaN /~ ~ ~ . ` 13 ''~~ 39jua \ ~~ 27 i ~ ISSa,O `~ ' ~ ~ !yy! c L `Sao! '~'~ ~~- !~~ ~ ~ ~~ aol, " ~J ~ at . • i 48 c ° ~ S.~ ~ 'S ~.. 26 S~oa ~ 7i0 ~ ~ - Sst . ~~. '• . -- 9 ~~ _~!s i a~ala ~ '.V ~ ~lSya s 69 . ~+. , 'S3~ ~ s~=~ ,,,/ .+~ ~' j j '~ ` ~ , * / 425'\ '.F13=S Z4 `~., ' , ~ ~` !r-'~ ,~1•~9'j3, a ~/- S! s ~- ~ sus ,. . ss•s ~ ~" -. ~! S3 Sy ` ji ~ 1 •2t • ~~ _ / gyt~ 66 ~S \ 1•% 1s ~ ~ 63 Sit \ .~~ _ 96/ // \ •\ ~ 36~' S7 '`\ ~• 61 .6~Sio ~=5~• S era-~~ /~~+~ e.. ~.... ` .•. ~ ~ . ~ w+~ • r / i `' _ 1 .- Richard Ferguson COMMUNITY SERVICES 5 0 5 3 B a t s am D r i v e AND DEVELOPMENT B e 11 a Mead e 38 P-54 ACTION # A-101089-2 ITEM NUMBER E- / AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: October 10, 1989 AGENDA ITEM: Prioritization of Additional Drainage Maintenance Projects COUNTY ADMINI~ TOR' S COMMENTS : ugh ~~ ~~~,~,j~ ~ ~'h.e~ .(tc,ct -n BACKGROUND' ~ ~1~~ The suggested prioritization of drainage maintenance projects was discussed at this afternoon's work session. SUNIlKARY OF INFORMATION: Attached are the exhibits of the previously approved projects and the proposed projects as prioritized by the staff. ALTERNATIVES AND IMPACTS: Alternative 1, would be to approve projects P-29 through P-54 with the realization that we are establishing priority projects beyond current funding limits. The completion of these projects could be well into the next fiscal year, but would allow staff to proceed with design, easement acquisition and scheduling. Alternative 2, would be to approve only projects P-29 and P-30 which would limit our prioritized project list to current Fiscal Year 89-90 budget levels. With the rollover of committed funds from last year's budget, we would be able to finish all projects through P-30. No additional funding for fiscal year 89-90 is being requested for either alternative. STAFF RECOMI~NDATION : ~~ Staff recommends that the Board approve Alternative 1, with the understanding that these projects will be completed as funds become available. SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: Phillip T. Henry, .E. Elmer C. Hodge Director of Engineering County Administrator ACTION VOTE Approved (~ Motion by. Harry C. Nickens/ No Yes Abs Richard W. Robers to Garrett x Denied ( ) x Received ( ) approve projects Johnson X Referred (Alt #1) McGraw x To Nickens Robers x cc: File Phillip Henry, Director, Engineering Cliff Craig, Director, Utilities John Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator ~=1 EXHIBIT "A" Previously Approved Projects C-~ MAINTENANCE PROJECTS (PRIORITIZED) p-1, g, W. Kessler 6911 Goff Road Loman Road P-2. Penn Forest Christian Church Penn Forest P-3. Russell E. Taylor 2824 Emissary Drive Montclair P-4. Bob Hansel 4514 Hammond Lane Eton Hills P-5. Dot Eller 3611 McDaniel Drive Andrew Lewis Place Complete Cost: $2.500 Complete Cost: $3,500 Complete Cost: $40,000 Ready for construction Cost: $25.000 Negotiating for easement Cost: $50,000 P-6. George Warner 3934 Sandpiper Drive Penn Forest P-7. Harry Goin 8167 Hunter's Trail Belleview Estates P-8. N. J. Holbrook 314 Woodmere Drive Lindenwood P-9. J. D. Thompson 618 Landfair Drive Lindenwood P-10.Richard Smoot 1325 Vivian Avenue Dwight Hills P-11.Stan Barnhill 3333 Kingswood Drive Algoma Park P-12.George Coughenhour 3319 Overhill Trail Penn Forest P-13.Lawrence E. Horton 3510 Penn Forest Boulevard Penn Forest Under construction Cost: $60,000 Complete Cost: $20,000 Complete Cost: $3,000 Complete Cost: $3,000 Complete Cost: $2,000 Complete Cost: $5,000 Ready for construction Cost: $37,000 Ready for construction Cost: $1.500 4 ~-~ P-14.Gene Tuttle 5551 Ambassador Drive Montclair Complete Cost: $5,000 P-15.Richard Looney 7340 Barrens Road Barrens Road P-i6.Norman Caldwell 2233 Ruritan Road La Bellevue P-17.David Crosswhite 5216 Burnt Quarter Drive Falling Creek Estates P-18.Bridle Lane Sugar Loaf Estates p-19.Watkins Sugar Loaf Mountain Road P-20.Jack Browning 2844 Embassy Drive P-21.W. P. Meador 5516 Lamplighter Drive P-22.Hugh Wells 3663 Chaparral Drive P-23.Cheryl Beach 5444 Lakedale Road P-24.Pauline Roberson 4314 Cresthill Drive P-25.George Billups 3558 Verona Trail P-26.Mrs. Charles H. Clum, Jr. 5041 Craun Lane P-27.Mrs. Vola Cockram 3549 Colony Lane P-28.Dennis Duff 5137 Waxmyrtle Complete Cost: $1,500 Ready for construction Cost: $5,000 Complete Cost: $2,000 Complete Cost: $2,000 Complete Cost: $1,500 Complete Cost: $5,000 Complete Cost: $1,000 Engineering and surveying underway Cost: $25,000 Complete Cost: $1,000 Ready for construction Cost: $2,500 Complete Cost: $1,500 Under construction Cost: $3,500 Complete Cost: $2,600 Ready for construction Cost: $3,500 5 ~-i EXHIBIT "B" Proposed Projects -~ MAINTENANCE PROJECTS (PRIORITIZED) P-29 . Ne 1 ms Lane (Board Resolution Nov. , ' 88 ) St. Rte. l~840 North County DESCRIPTION: install storm sewervs~stem d Roanoke City to ESTIMATED COST: x61,000 MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Hollins P-30. John D. Kelly (RFA 88E125) 942 Starmount Avenue (Settlement) Starmount DESCRIPTION: $tormesewerquchannel~improvementsn of 125' of ESTIMATED COST: 612,500 MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Catawba P-31. Lynn Kirk (RFA 89E310) 4704 Whipplewood Drive Branderwood DESCRIPTION: Remove silt f rom pipe inlet and stabilize channel ESTIMATED COST: x500 MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Cave Spring P- 32. Bobby Joe Hogan (RFA 89E399) 2814 Embassy Circle Thomas E. Chocklett (RFA 89E401) 2820 Embassy Circle Roy Kendrick (RFA 89E326) 2831 Embassy Drive Montclair Estates DESCRIPTION: Channel improvements ESTIMATED COST: 320,000 7 ~`- f MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Catawba P-33. Raymond Hodges (RFA 88E228) 509 Palisades Drive Lindenwood DESCRIPTION: Storm sewer rehabilitation - upgrade inadequate pipe ESTIMATED COST: 310,000 MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Vinton P-34. Palm Va11ey1Sun Valley (Request from Board) DESCRIPTION: Channel improvements, additionalflume baffling ESTIMATED COST: 325,000 MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Hollins P-35. Dick Simpson (RFA 89E368) 5332 Cave Spring Lane Harold Butler (RFA 88E162) 5326 Cave Spring Lane Nottingham Hilis DESCRIPTION: Repair blocked storm sewer and stabilize inlet ESTIMATED COST: 34,000 MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Cave Spring P-36. J. D. Porter (RFA 89E390) 2745 Tanglewood Drive Meadowlark DESCRIPTION: Install rip-rap in drainage channel ESTIMATED COST: 31,500 MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Cave Spring 8 L `"'' P-37. John Glovier 4620 Vest Drive Eton Hills (RFA 89E316) DESCRIPTION: Extend storm drain to low point within the drainage easement ESTIMATED COST: 51,500 MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Cave Spring P-38. Ron Callahan (RFA 89E330) 5138 Springlawn Avenue Springlawn DESCRIPTION: Storm sewer rehabilitation ESTIMATED COST: 56,000 MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Cave Spring P-39. Kim Hagood 2938 Merino Drive Castle Rock Farms (RFA 88E222) DESCRIPTION: Repair damaged junction box and stabilize channel ESTIMATED COST: 32,500 MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Windsor Hills P-40. Thomas L. Wright (RFA 89E235) 2737 Tully Drive Glen Cove DESCRIPTION: Rehabilitation of existing storm sewer ESTIMATED COST: 55,000 MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Catawba P-41. William T. Andrews (RFA 88E192) 5702 Pine Acres Lane Pine Acres DESCRIPTION: Grade and reshape drainage ditch ESTIMATED COST: 51,000 9 ~.~"° MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Cave Spring P-42. Samuel Irvin (RFA 89E247) 4124 Eagle Circle Penn Forest DESCRIPTION: Channel reconstruction and stabilization ESTIMATED COST: X1,500 MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Cave Spring P-43. David Smith (RFA 89E249) 1446 Freeborn Circle Hamden Hills DESCRIPTION: Repair broken storm sewer in drainage easement ESTIMATED COST: X1,000 MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Vinton P-44. Donald Obenchain (RFA 89E250) 3743 Colonial Avenue Colonial Heights DESCRIPTION: Reconstruct drainage ditch ESTIMATED COST: X500 MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Cave Spring P-45. Glen Unroe (RFA 89E253) 4101 Arlington Hills Drive Arlington Hills DESCRIPTION: Channel improvements ESTIMATED COST: 16500 MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Cave Spring P-46. Howard Boblett (RFA 89E264) 5443 Chatsworth Drive Mount Vernon Forest. DESCRIPTION: Stabilize channel, rip-rap pipe outlet. 10 -~ ESTIMATED COST: 31,500 MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Windsor Hills (RFA 89E279) p-47. Lawrence Morgan 4956 Wing Commander Drive Nichols Estates DESCRIPTION: Construct drainage channel ESTIMATED COST: 32,000 MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Windsor Hills (RFA 89E293) p-4g. Walter E. Stokley 7887 Enon Drive North Burlington DESCRIPTION: Construct adequate drainage ditch ESTIMATED COST: 33,000 MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Hollins (RFA 89E299) P-49. Ralph Horne 1112 East Drive Dillard Court DESCRIPTION: Channel improvements ESTIMATED COST: 31,500 MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Hollins (RFA 89E344) P-50. John W. Vaughn 4443 Wyndale Avenue Wyndale DESCRIPTION: Grade,~anddt~chPe ditch from pipe outlet to exist g ESTIMATED COST: 31,500 MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Windsor Hills -/ (RFA 89E383) P-51 . Gary Smith 1160 Vivian Avenue Dwight Hills DESCRIPTION: Channel improvements ESTIMATED COST: $5,000 MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Catawba (RFA 89E393) P-52. Steven Bratcher 5402 Green Meadow Road Farmington Lake DESCRIPTION: Stabilization within drainage easement ESTIMATED COST: $500 MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Windsor Hills (RFA 89E415) P-53. John Eades 4306 Fontaine Drive Cresthill DESCRIPTION: Acquire easement and construct swale from VDOT R/WaY ESTIMATED COST: $6,000 MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Windsor Hills P-54. Richard Ferguson 5053 Balsam Drive Belle Meade (RFA 89E417) DESCRIPTION: JoinalPr~roptinlet aDndTstormpsewertY owner to inst ESTIMATED COST: $10,000 MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Cave Spring 12 f ~-~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, OCTOBER 10, 1989 RESOLUTION 101089-3 ENDORSING THE DESIGNATION OF PORTIONS OF STATE ROUTE 311 AS A VIRGINIA BYWAY BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: WHEREAS, in 1966, the General Assembly passed the Scenic Highway and Virginia Byways Act authorizing the designation of Virginia Byway to certain roads meeting criteria which establishes their scenic or cultural value, and WHEREAS, The State Department of Conservation and Recreation are in the process of considering requests from neighboring localities to include several new routes as Designated Virginia Byways, and WHEREAS, the Division of Planning and Recreation Resources and the Department of Transportation have evaluated these roads and recommend their designation as Virginia Byways, and WHEREAS, they have suggested that Route 311 west of I- 81 to the West Virginia state line would also qualify, and are requesting support for this designation from Roanoke County, Craig County and Allegheny County. THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County endorses the designation as a Virginia Byway of Route 311 west of I-81 to the West Virginia state line which would create a byway loop of 100 miles of scenic roadway. On motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by Supervisor Robers and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None A COPY TESTS: 7~GL'L~~ Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors 10/11/89 CC: File John R. Davy, Jr., Division of Planning and Recreation Resource, Dept. of Conservation and Recreation Jeffrey D. Johnson, Craig County Administrator Macon Sammons, Jr., Alleghany County Administrator John Williamson, Botetourt County Administrator Terry Harrington, Planning Director R. L. Hundley, VDOT, Richmond ACTION N0. ITEM NUMBER c'~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: October 10, 1989 AGENDA ITEM: Resolution endorsing the designation of Route 311 as a Virginia Byway COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR' 5~~.lC~OMMENTS "0 a BACKGROUND The Virginia Byways Program is a state program established to identify outstanding road segments and to conserve them for the enjoyment of all Virginians as well as out-of-state visitors. Certain criteria must be met for a road to be designated a Virginia Byway. These include scenic value, diversity of landscape, access to significant sites, and feasibility of landscape control. No state restrictions are imposed with the designation, and all land use controls are applied at the local level. Endorsement by the local governing body of such as designation is a part of the procedure for designation. Attached are excerpts from the Guide for Virginia Byway Management explaining the program further. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The State Department of Conservation and Recreation is in the process of considering requests from several neighboring localities to include several new routes as designated Virginia Byways. They include Routes 159 and 311 in Allegheny County, portions of Route 43 in Botetourt County, and portions of Route 606 and 61 in Botetourt and Craig County. The Division of Planning and Recreation Resources and the Department of Transportation have evaluated these roads and found that they qualify as Virgi~.ia Byways. They also note that Route 311 west of I-81 to the West Virginia State line also qualified for this designation. They have suggested that this- route also be included as a Virginia Byway which would create a byway loop of almost 100 miles of scenic roadway. However, such a request should come from the governing bodies where the roads are located, and are requesting endorsement of the designation of Route 311 from Roanoke County, Craig County and Allegheny County. t-a STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the attached resolution endorsing the addition of Route 311 west of I-81 to the West Virginia Sate line be designated as a Virginia Byway. C~~~ ~~ Elmer C. Hodg County Administrator ------------------------------------ ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: Yes No Abs Denied ( ) Garrett Received ( ) Johnson Referred McGraw Nickens To• Robers . ~~..„"~ AT A REGULAR MpETIHELDF ATH THE ROANOKES COUNTY OADM ONISTRATOON COUNTY, VIRGINI , CENTER ON TUESDAY, OCTOBER 10, 1989 RESOLUTION ENDORSING THE DESIGNATION OF PORTIONS OF STATE ROUTE 311 AS A VIRGINIA BYWAY BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: WHEREAS, in 1966, the General Assembly passed the Scenic Highway and Virginia Byways Act authorizing the designation of Virginia Byway to certain roads meeting criteria which establishes their scenic or cultural value, and WHEREAS, The State Department of Conservation and Recreation are in the process of considering requests from neighboring localities to include several new routes as Designated Virginia Byways, and WHEREAS, the Division of Planning and Recreation Resources and the Department of Transportation have evaluated these roads and recommend their designation as Virginia Byways, and WHEREAS, they have suggested that Route 311 west of I- 81 to the West Virginia state line would also qualify, and are requesting support for this designation from Roanoke County, Craig County and Allegheny County. THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County endorses the designation as a Virginia Byway of Route 311 west of I-81 to the West Virginia state line which would create a byway loop of 100 miles of scenic roadway. the 1970 Virginia Outdoors Plan was published, the proposed Virginia Byway System has been refined to include over 1600 of the more than 50,000 miles of existing state roads. In 1973, the first designation came in Fairfax County, when the Board of Supervisors requested that a historic and scenic segment of Route 193 become a Virginia Byway. IV. VIRGINIA BYWAY CRITERIA AND PROCEDURES The designation process may be initiated by: a) by a locality, through a citizen's request or governmental action b) by the Department of Conserva- tion and Historic Resources or c) by the Virginia Department of Transporta- tion. Once a request has been received, the Department of Conservation and Historic Resources and the Department of Transportation undertake a field survey to see if the roadways meet the physical criteria for designation. The localities should signify that they are interested in the Virginia-Byway designation before any further steps are taken by the Commonwealth. Usually the DCHR requests that a letter or a resolution supporting Virginia Byway designation from the Board of Supervisors be forwarded to Richmond as part of the record. Once official assurances are received, DCHR's Divisions of Parks and Recrea- tion and Historic Landmarks examine the significance of historic sits along the corridor as well as local zoning and comprehensive plans. If a road under consideration is found to meet the adopted criteria, the Director of DCHR then makes a recommendation to the Commonwealth Transportation Board, which is charged with the legislative responsibility for designation. In addition, the Department of Transportation staff reviews information and expresses to the Board its views about designation. The Commonwealth Transportation Board makes the final determination as to whether a roadway should receive this designation, the VDOT conducts annual inspections of the roadway. A. Adopted Criteria In order to be considered for designation as a Virginia Byway, a segment of road must substantially meet the tests of the following physical criteria: 5 . `" 1. The route provides important scenic values and experiences. 2. There is a diversity of experiences as in transition from one landscape scene to another. 3, The route links together or provides access to significant scenic, scientific, historic or recreational points. 4, The route bypasses major roads or provides opportunity to leave high-speed routes for variety and leisure in motoring. 5. Landscape control or management along the route is feasible. 6. The route is susceptible to techniques to provide for user safety. 7, The route contributes to good distribution within elements of the scenic highway and Virginia byway system. 8. Preference shall be given to those corridors controlled by zoning or otherwise, so as to reasonably protect the aesthetic or cul- tural value of the highway. If on-site inspection shows that the road(s) meet the physical cri- teria, the Department of Conservation and Historic Resources' (DCHR) B. Procedures For Designation The Department of Conservation and Historic Resources and the Department of Transportation will jointly: 1. Initiate the study of a potential Scenic Highway or Virginia Byway as a measure implementing the Virginia Outdoors Plan or upon the request of a local governing body. 2. Make onsite inspection of the route to determine if it meets the physical criteria. 3. Request a resolution or other assurance, indicating that the local governing body (bodies) is interested in scenic designation. The Director of the Department of Conservation and Historic Resources will: 4. Coordinate within the Department, with the Virginia Outdoors Foundation, and with other appropriate state agencies to determine the location and significance of historic sites and/or other natural resources in close proximity to the road corridor. 6 ~f 5. Determine that local zoning and comprehensive planning programs of the locality and the planning district commissions are consistent with the management objectives established for Scenic Highways or Virginia Byways. 6. Recommend the designation of the potential scenic highway or Virginia Byway to the Commonwealth Transportation Board through the Commissioner of the Department of Transportation. The Commissioner of the Department of Transportation will: 7. Submit potential scenic highways or Virginia Byways proposals recommended by the Director of the Department of Conservation and Historic Resources to the Commonwealth Transportation Board for their action. 8. Advise the Director of the Department of Conservation and Historic Resources of Board action. 9. Work with local governing agency to achieve the management objec- tive(s). 10. Conduct annual inspections of the maintenance and improvements of the route. C. Procedures for Designation Revocation If the Department of Transportation's annual inspection indicates a Scenic highway or Virginia Byway no longer meets minimum standards, the Common- wealth Transportation Board will request a joint investigation by the two Departments. Listed below are the procedural steps which should be fol- lowed: 1. The two Departments will notify the local governing body, the planning district commission, interested individuals and organiza- tions of the requested investigation. 2. In coordination with the local governing body, the Departments will make an on-site inspection of the route and provide sugges- tions to the locality for corrections, improvements or restora- tions as necessary to maintain designation and a recommended time frame for action. 3. The Directors will recommend to the Co~anonwealth Transportation Board that the designation be revoked upon finding that the quality of the road segment cannot be restored to meet minimum standards. 7 ACTION # ITEM NUMBER / ~ '~" A AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER IN ROANOKE, VA., ON TUESDAY, OCTOBER 10, 1989 MEETING DATE: October 10, 1989 AGENDA ITEM: ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTIONS 10-4 AND 10-15 AND ADDING SECTION 10-19 OF CHAPTER 10, LICENSES , OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE COUNTY ADMINISTRAT/OR'S COMMENTS: .~r.C A;~~~~ BACKGROUND• During the extensive revision of the current Business License Ordinance adopted on November 22, 1988, no explicit provision was included establishing criminal liability for failure to apply for a business license or file a business license tax return. Over the past nine months, several instances have come to light of businesses, especially those selling their goods from vehicles, which are operating in this county without the benefit of a business license or return. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Section 58.1-3700 makes it a violation of law to carry on any business, employment, or profession without first obtaining a license where the law requires a license and the legislature has levied a license tax on such business, employment or profession. Section 58.1-3916.1 attaches criminal penalties for willful failure or refusal to file a required business license return as well as for making fraudulent statements in connection with such return. A recent amendment graduates the penalty based upon the amount of the lawful tax assessment. A recent addition to Virginia's criminal code, Section 18.2-248.6, now provides that a business license shall be forfeited where the entity holding such license is convicted either of the sale of an imitation controlled substance under Section 18.2-248 or of laundering of drug related proceeds under Section 18.2-248.7. A problem which has arisen with regard to refunds of business license taxes has been addressed by a change to a quarterly as opposed to a monthly basis for calculating refunds. However the minimum license tax provided for by any section of this ordinance would not be refunded. N STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of these amendments in order to close a significant loophole in the county's business license ordinance. Respectfully submit Jo ph B~~ dbenshain, Esq. S for A s't. County Attorney Action Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by Vote No Yes Abs Garrett Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers /-{- f AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, OCTOBER 10, 1989 ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTIONS 10-4 AND 10-15 AND ADDING SECTION 10-19 OF CHAPTER 10, LICENSES, OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on October 10, 1989; and the second reading and public hearing was held on October 24, 1989. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. Chapter 10, Licenses, of the Roanoke County Code is hereby amended as follows: Sec. 10-4. Application for license; duties of commissioner; ~~~ ,penalties for operating business without a license, failing to file an application or filing false statements. a) All persons embraced by this chapter, unless otherwise specifically provided, shall make application for licenses to the commissioner of the revenue by January 31 of each year. The commissioner of the revenue shall furnish the necessary forms, which shall be properly filled in with such information as the commissioner may require. Every applicant for a license to conduct any business, profession, trade, or occupation under the provisions of this chapter shall furnish the commissioner of the revenue in writing with his correct name and trade name; his correct residence address; the nature of the business, profession, trade, or occupation to be pursued; the place where it is to be pursued; and a record of gross receipts verified by oath for the preceding twelve (12 ) months ; as well as such other information as may be required by the commissioner of the revenue. The commissioner shall compute the amount of license tax and after payment shall issue the license, subject to zoning certification as provided in section 10-7. b) It shall be unlawful and a violation of this chapter for any person to operate a business, profession, trade, or occupation within the county without having first obtained a license in accordance with this section and before posting such license as required b section 10-13. Such violations shall constitute a class 1 misdemeanor. ~-~ 2 c) It shall be unlawful and a violation of this chapter for any person to make false statements with intent to defraud in any application, return, or affidavit required by this chapter. Such violation shall constitute (i) a class 3 misdemeanor if the amount of the tax lawfully assessed in connection with the return is $1,000 or less, or (ii) a class 1 misdemeanor if the amount of the tax lawfully assessed in connection with the return in more than $1,000. Upon conviction under this section, the commissioner of the revenue shall revoke all licenses of the business for the balance of the tax year. d) AnYt~erson, firm, or corporation holding a license under this cha ter to o erate an business shall forfeit such license immediately upon conviction by any court of competent jurisdiction in the Commonwealth of Virginia of a violation of (i) section 18.2 248 relatinct to an imitation controlled substance or (ii) section 18 2-248 7 relating to money launderinct. e) No license issued pursuant to this chapter shall be valid or effective unless and until the tax required shall be paid to the county treasurer and such payment shall be shown on the license. f) The commissioner of the revenue shall report monthly to the treasurer the aggregate amount of license taxes assessed during the month and placed in the hands of the treasurer for collection. State law reference - Code of Virginia Section 58.1-3916.1, 18.2- 248.6. Sec. 10-15. Certification of erroneous assessment; refunds when licensee ceases to do business. a) The commissioner of the revenue is empowered to certify to the treasurer any instances of erroneous assessments. Upon receipt of such certificate the treasurer is directed to make a refund based upon the certificate of the commissioner of the revenue. b) Licenses issued under the provisions of article II of this chapter, except those measured by other than gross receipts or gross expenditures, shall be subject to refund where the licensee goes out of business before the end of the current license year subject to all of the following qualifications: 1) License for the current license year must be based on gross receipts or gross expenditures obtained throughout the preceding calendar year. 2) The reason for going-out-of-business is not connected in any manner with the violation of any state law or local ordinance or violation of any I 3 rules or regulations made pursuant thereto. 3) The amount of refund shall be determined in the following manner: If the licensee goes out of business before the end of any month except December, the refund shall be calculated by dividing the tax paid for that year's license by a fraction in which the numerator shall be the number of months remaining in the calendar year followina the month in which business ceases and the denominator is the number twelve (12): but in no case shall the refund reduce the tax below the minimum as provided by this code. T r ~ 1+ ' l~~' .~~ ~ L T C" t1L 1 .. v a a G11 "1 y~''~..~ Q ~7A~~er~i s r ~ G i V i G t+ • i ~ a u.^r ..~„ T i ~ LL. r. .,..a .,t..~it 9~ i ' - A '37C'Ts ~$ ~ / 1 GL y~ eZ~.~ Gil G~% l\ ~ ^ ~c L1'• ll-{ ~ O ~eAI ~TrG LG1\131~ n~'~• •a +Z 4) No refund shall be made of any minimum flat tax or of any other flat license fee not based on gross receipts. c) Refunds based on licensee going out of business shall be made in the same manner as herein provided for erroneous assessments. d) If any person seeking a refund is indebted to the county or any department or office thereof, or is indebted to any state constitutional office of the county for a local levy, the refund, or so much thereof as is necessary, shall first be applied to such indebtedness. e) Any person who has been properly issued a license may apply for a refund prior to the date upon which the license was to become effective by providing satisfactory evidence to the Commissioner of the Revenue that the business was never commenced or the sale, show, performance, or exhibition will not take place. Upon being satisfied that such license was never in effect, the f the Revenue may authorize a refund of the license Commissioner o fee less a thirty dollar ($30) processing fee. State Law Reference - Code of Virginia Section 58.1-3980, 3981. y-I 4 2. That Chapter 10, "Licenses," of the Roanoke County Code be, and hereby is, amended and reenacted by the addition of the following section to read and provide as follows: Sec. 10-18. Penalties. An erson who shall willfull fail or refuse to file a business license tax return as rectuired by Section 10-4 shall be uilt of a violation of law. U on conviction for such failure the erson shall be unished as a Class 3 misdemeanor if the amount of the tax lawfull assessed in connection with the return is 1 000 or less and as a Class 1 misdemeanor if the amount of the tax lawfull assessed in connection with the return is more than 1 000. State Law Reference--Code of Virginia, Section 58.1-3916.1 and Section 58.1-3700. 3. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect on and after November 1, 1989. ACTION # ITEM NUMBER=~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: Octo'oer 10, 1989 AGENDA ITEM: Authorization to amend Chapter 8, "Erosion and Sediment Control" of the Roanoke County Code by amending Section 8-11 (a), "Control Measures Generally", to provide for adoption of Stormwater Management Criteria. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND : Wv'~ ,,fw"t~/~(/[ 1~~~-""" aLGfrt.N"' r''~„~ ""' , With the increased amount of flooding, in the past several years, Stormwater Management and Drainage Control has become a major issue. The County is presently addressing these issues by: 1. Instituting a drainage program. 2. Recommending detention for rezonings, a 10 year run-off storm predevelopment to a predeveloped 2 year condition. 3. Improving enforcement provisions for Erosion and Sediment Control. 4. The County has identified Stormwater Management as a valleywide issue. The proposed standards will require new development (site and subdivision) to provide adequate detention/retention of Stormwater to insure that new problems are not created with the aggravation of old problems. Further Amendments to the Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinance, Subdivision Ordinance and the Design Construction Standards Manual will be necessary as valleywide Stormwater problems are addressed. H~x This ro osed Amendment to the Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinance rimes for :_ 1. New development must provide on-site detention and retention of stormwater. 2. Increase detention/retention requirements for new developments. 3, Require additional site elevation and grading information. 4. Require Maintenance Agreements of Stormwater Management Facilities, by Ordinance, in lieu of policy. This Amendment accomplishes the following: 1. On-site detention/retention of 10 and 50 year storms. 2. On-site grading to manage surface run-off to appropriate and adequate drainage facility. 3. Require maintenance of detention facilities by Ordinance. 4. To insure new developments do not create new problems and aggravate old problems. This Amendment does not address the folldowing: 1. Does not correct existing downstream flooding. 2. Does not address flooding conditions greater than a 50 year flood storm. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The first reading of the Ordinance is scheduled for October 10, 1989; the Public Hearing and second reading is scheduled for October 24, 1989. The remaining portions of the Stormwater Management Standards and Specifications will be presented at a later date. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the proposed Amendment to the Erosion Sediment Control Ordinance and the adoption of the Stormwater Management Criteria be approved. The Amendments, Additions and Reactments shall be in full force and affect, from and after October 25, 1989, and the effective date of this Ordinance and the Stormwater Management Criteria for the Design and Construction Standards Manual shall - ~` apply to plans which have not been accepted for review by the Department of Development and Inspections prior to October 25, 1989; provided said plans in the review process receive final approval by the County within sixty (60) days of October 25, 1989. ~MITTED BY: APPROVED: ~i¢~ r Arnold Cove Elmer C. Hodge Director of Develo ment Review County Administrator and Inspections -------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by• No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Garrett Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers /-~ '.. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, OCTOBER 10, 1989 ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 8, "EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL" OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE BY AMENDING SECTION 8-11(a), "CONTROL MEASURES GENERALLY" TO PROVIDE FOR THE ADOPTION OF STORMWATER MANAGEMENT CRITERIA WHEREAS, the adoption of more stringent criteria to regulate stormwater management is authorized by Section 10.1-562 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended; and WHEREAS, notice of the County's intention to adopt an amendment to its erosion and sediment control ordinance was duly advertised in the Roanoke Times and World News on October 10, 1989, and October 17, 1989; and WHEREAS, the first reading on this ordinance was held on October 10, 1989; the second reading and public hearing were held on October 24, 1989. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That Chapter 8, "Erosion and Sediment Control" of the Roanoke County Code be, and hereby is, amended and reenacted by amending Section 8-11(a) to read and provide as follows: Sec. 8-11. Control measures generally. (a) Practices for erosion and sediment control in the county shall meet or exceed the standards and specifications contained in the Virginia Erosion and Sediment Control Handbook, Part III, a published and amended through March 8, 1983, in haec Verba and the Code of Virginia, as amended, through such date, except for those more stringent local stormwater management criteria which the Board ~~ of Supervisors of Roanoke County Virginia may adopt by resolution and incorporate into the manual of regulations and policies entitled " Design and Construction Standards Manual." 2. That these amendments, additions, and reenactments shall be in full force and effect from and after October 25, 1989, and that the effective date for this ordinance and the stormwater management criteria for the Design and Construction Standards Manual shall apply to plans which have not been accepted for review by the Department of Development and Inspections prior to October 25, 1989; provided said plans in the review process receive final approval by the County within sixty (60) days of October 25, 1989. 1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, OCTOBER 10, 1989 ORDINANCE 101089-4 AMENDING AND REENACTING ARTICLE III, DIVISION 2, USE OF VALUE ASSESSMENT OF CERTAIN REAL ESTATE, OF CHAPTER 21, TAXATION, OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE WHEREAS, Article III, Division 2, of Chapter 21 of the Roanoke County Code provides for a use value assessment of certain real estate in order to preserve agricultural, horticultural, forest and open space uses within the County's boundaries consistent with the County's land use plan; and WHEREAS, the 1989 session of the General Assembly of Virginia enacted certain amendments to Article 4 of Chapter 32 of Title 58.1 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, to provide for uniform standards for real estate taxation to be prescribed by the Director of the Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, the Virginia Commissioner of Agriculture and Consumer Services, and the State Forester and other procedurals; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading and public hearing was held on September 26, 1989; a second reading was held on October 10, 1989, concerning amending Article III, Division 2, of Chapter 21 of the Roanoke County Code pertain to use value assessment and fee . NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That Chapter 21, Taxation, of the Roanoke County Code be amended by deleting the present Article III, Division 2 and reenacting a new Article III, Division 2, Use value assessment of certain real estate as follows: Sec. 21-51. Findings. The County of Roanoke finds that the preservation of real estate devoted to agricultural horticultural forest and open s ace uses within its boundaries is in the ublic interest and having heretofore adopted a land use plan, hereby ordains that such real estate shall be taxed in accordance with the provisions of Article 4 of Chapter 32 of Title 58 1 of the Code of Viralnia, the standards prescribed by the Director of the Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation the Vir inia Commissioner of A ricultural and Consumer Service and the State Forester and this ordinance. Sec. 21-52. Applications for special assessment: fees. ia~ A lications for taxation of real estate on the basis of use assessment shall be submitted to the real estate assessor on forms provided by the Virginia Department of Taxation and supplied b the real estate assessor. The a lication shall include such additional schedules photographs, and drawings as may be reauired by the real estate assessor. ~b1 Applications shall be submitted: ~L At least sixty (60) days precedina the tax year for which such taxation is sought; or x,21, In any year in which a general reassessment is being made until thirt 30 da s have ela sed after the notice of increase in assessment has been mailed to the property owner in accordance with Section 58 1-3330 of the Code of Virginia, or sixty S60) days precedina the tax year, whichever is later. ~L The application shall be signed by all owners of the sub'ect ro ert An owner of an undivided interest in the ro ert ma a 1 on behalf of owners that are minors or that cannot be located upon submitting an affidavit attesting to such facts. ~dl A separate application shall be filed for each parcel tract shown on the land book. ~ An application fee of Ten Dollars ($10.00) shall accompany each application. S~ An application may be filed within no more than sixty X60) days after the filing deadline specified in subparagraph (b) above upon payment of a later filing fee in the sum of Twenty Dollars ($20.00). ~ An a lication shall be submitted whenever the use or acrea a of such land reviousl a roved chan es• rovided however that no application fee shall be required when a chance in acreage occurs solely as a result of a conveyance necessitated by governmental action or condemnation of a portion of any land previously approved. If any tax on the land affected by an application is delinctuent when the application is filed then the application shall not be accepted Upon payment of all delinquent taxes, interest and penalties relating to such land, the application shall then be treated in accordance with this section. Sil. Such property owner must revalidate annually with the real estate assessor any application previously approved. A revalidation fee of Ten Dollars ($10 00) shall accompany each application for revalidation every sixth year. Late filing of a revalidation form must be made on or before the effective date of the assessment and accompanied with a late filing fee of Twenty Dollars ($20). Sec. 21-53. Determination of use value and assessment. Sal Promptly upon receipt of an application^ the real estate ordinance Article 4 of Cha ter 32 of Title 58.1 of the Code o Virginia, and the applicable standards prescribed thereunder by the Director of the De artment of Conservation and Recreation the Commissioner of A riculture and Consumer Services and the State Forester. ~1 Minimum acreage. X11 Real estate devoted to: Sal a ricultural or horticultural use shall consist of a minimum of five acres forest use shall consist of a minimum of twenty acres; ~ o en s ace use shall consist of a minimum of five acres except that real estate adiacent to a scenic river a scenic hiahway, a Virginia Byway or public property shall consist of a minimum of two acres. A scenic river scenic highway, Virginia Byway or public property under this paragraph means those-which are listed in the State Comprehensive Outdoor Recreational Plan also known as the Virginia Outdoors Plan a copy of which can be obtained from the Department of Conservation and Recreation, 302 Governor Street, Suite 203, Richmond. VA 23219. X21 The foregoing requirements for minimum acreage shall be determined by adding together the total area of contiguous real estate excludin recorded subdivision lots titled in the same ownership For purposes of this section, properties separated only by a public right-of-way are considered continuous. ~_ In addition to meeting the foregoing requirements for minimum acreage, real estate devoted to open space use shall be. ~ within an agricultural, a forestal, or an agricultural and forestal district entered into pursuant to Chapter 36 (Sec 15 1 1507 et seq ) of Title 15 1 of the Code of Virginia, or ~_ subject to a recorded perpetual easement, restrictive covenant or equitable servitude that is held by a public body and that promotes the open space use classification as defined in Sec 58 1-3230 of the Code of Virginia, or ~ subject to a recorded commitment meeting the standards prescribed by the Director of the Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation and entered into by the landowner with the County. If the real estate assessor determines that the property does meet such criteria he shall determine the value of such ro ert for its alif in use as well as its fair market value. L~ In determinin wnezner tine sui., G~~ 1~ =1 ~ •,~~~~-- ..___ criteria for "a ricultural use" or "horticultural use" the real estate assessor may request an opinion from the Commissioner of A_aricultural and Consumer Services; in determining whether the subject property meets the criteria for "forest use" he may _request an opinion from the State Forester; and in determining whether the subject property meets the criteria for "open space use" he ma re est an o inion from the Director of Conservation and Recreation Upon the refusal of the Commissioner of Agriculture and Consumer Services State Forester or the Director of the Department of Conservation and Recreation to issue an opinion, or in the event of an unfavorable opinion which does not comport with standards set forth by the respective director the party aggrieved ma seek relief from an court of record wherein the real estate in question is located If the court finds in his favor it may issue an order which shall serve in lieu of an opinion for the ,purposes of this ordinance. Sec. 21-54. Taxation based on qualifying use. The use value and fair market value of anv aualifvina property shall be placed on the land book before delivery to the treasurer, and the tax shall be extended from the use value. Continuation of valuation, assessment and taxation based upon land use shall depend on continuance of the real estate in a aualifvina use continued payment of taxes as required in Section 58 1-3235 and compliance with other reauirements of Article 4 of Chapter 32 of Title 58.1 of the Code of Virginia, the applicable standards prescribed by the Director of the Vir inia De artment of Conservation and Recreation the Vir inia Commissioner of A riculture and Consumer Services and the State Forester, and this ordinance, and not upon continuance in the same owner of title to the land. Sec. 21-55. Indexing and filing of approved applications. The real estate assessor shall prepare and transmit to the clerk of the circuit court a list of all applications filed and approved under this division along with the original copy of such a lication. The clerk shall index the names in a book entitled "Land Use Tax Assessment Book" and file each application in this office. The clerk shall be com ensated at the rate of One Dollar 1.00 for filin and indexin each a lication or revalidation. Sec. 21-56. Delinauent taxes. If on June 1 of any year the taxes for anv prior year on a~ parcel of real property which has special assessment as provided for in this ordinance are delinquent, the County shall send notice of that fact and the eneral rovisions of Sec. 58.1-3235 of the Code of Virginia to the property owner by first-class mail. If after sending such notice such delinquent taxes remain unpaid on November 1 the treasurer shall notify the real estate assessor who shall remove such parcel from the land use program. Sec. 21-57. Change in use zoning or area; roll-back taxes. There is hereb im osed a roll-back tax and interest thereon in such amounts as may be determined under Virginia Code Sec. 58.1- 3237 on real estate which has alified for assessment and taxation on the basis of use under this ordinance upon one or more of the following occurrences: ~ when the use by which it qualified changes to a more intensive use; Sb~ when it is rezoned to a more intensive use as described in Sec 58 1 3237 of the Code of Virainia; or ~c1 when one or more parcels, lots or pieces of land are se crated or s lit off from the real estate as described in Sec. 58 1-3241 of the Code of Virainia. Such additional taxes shall only be assessed against that portion of such real estate which no lonaer qualifies for assessment and taxation on the basis of use or zoning. Sec. 21-58. Failure to report chances; misstatements in application. 1a1 The owner of an real estate liable for roll-back taxes shall, within sixty (60) days following a chance in use_, report such chance to the real estate assessor on such forms as may be rescribed. The real estate assessor shall forthwith determine and assess the roll-back tax which shall be paid to the treasurer within thirty X30) days of assessment by the owner of the property at the time the chance in use which no lonaer qualifies occurs. Upon failure to report within sixty (60) days followina such chance in use or failure to pay within thirty (30) days of assessment or both such owner shall be liable for an additional penalty ectual _ _ _r LL_ wwl l -L. L +'~V AY1f~ 1111.C1 C~ v waaL Vaa ......,.~ .- ------- -- - - In addition to such penalty for failure to make required report, there is hereby imposed interest of one-half (1/2~) percent o_f the amount of the roll-back tax, interest and penalty, for each month or failure thereof during which the failure continues. ~_ An erson makin material misstatements of fact other than a clerical error in any application filed pursuant hereto shall be liable for all taxes in such amounts and at such times as if such ro ert had been assessed on the basis of fair market value as applied to other real estate toaether with interest and enalties thereon and he shall be further assessed with an additional penalty of one hundred (100%) percent of such unpaid taxes. The term "material misstatement of fact" shall have the same meanin as it has under Sec. 58.1-3238 of the Code of Virginia. Sec. 21-59. Application of Title 58 1 of the Code of Virainia. The provisions of Title 58 1 of the Code of Virainia a licable to local levies and real estate assessment and taxation shall be a licable to assessments and taxation hereunder mutatis mutandis including without limitation, provisions relating to tax liens and the correction of erroneous assessments and for such ur oses the roll-back taxes shall be considered to be deferred real estate taxes. Sec. 21-60. Effective date. This ordinance shall be effective for all tax years beainninci on and after January 1, 1990. On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor McGraw, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisor Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Mary H. A len, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File John Willey, Director, Real Estate Assessment Alfred C. Anderson, Treasurer R. Wayne Compton, Commissioner of Revenue John Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator Terry Harrington, Director, Planning Arnold Covey, Director, Development & Inspections Phillip Henry, Director, Engineering Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney Skip Burkart, Commonwealth Attorney Magistrate Sheriff's Department Roanoke Law Library, 315 Church Avenue, S.W., Rke, 24016 Main Library Roanoke County Code Book Roanoke County J&D Court, Intake Counsellor ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER ""' ! AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: October 10, 1989 AGENDA ITEM: Second Reading for Ordinance amending and reenacting Article III, Division 2, Use of Value Assessment of Certain Real Estate, of Chapter 21, Taxation, of the Roanoke County Code COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR' S COMMENTS : ,~,t u~^ ~~%'~ "~" "' ~~O e'"/ l ` C1 -mac v~*~- ~~ b BACKGROUND' The 1989 Session of the General Assembly of Virginia enacted certain amendments to the State Land Use Provision in Chapter 32, 58.1 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, to provide for uniform standards for real estate taxation. It is necessary to amend and revise the Roanoke County Ordinance in order to conform procedurally with the new Commonwealth of Virginia provisions. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The provision in the proposed ordinance requires written commitment from the landowners in the "Open Space" Land Use Classification. Implementation would provide more effective roll back tax provisions. This ordinance will commit the property owners in the land use category to preserve the natural resources and the conservation of land. It will also further restrict developing the open space land use category other than in the best interest of the public. RECOMMENDATION' Accept and act on staff recommendation to amend and reenact Article III, Division 2, Use of Value Assessment of certain real estate following second reading on October 10, 1989 .-~- Respectfully submitted, Approved by, ,~~ ~ , -, ~~- l~ ~ Elmer C. Hodge ohn D. Willey ~~irector of~Real ~st'ate Assessment County Administrator ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion y: No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Garrett Received ( ) Johnson Referred ( ) McGraw Nickens To ( ) Robers .~'- I AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, OCTOBER 10, 1989 ORDINANCE AMENDING AND REENACTING ARTICLE III, DIVISION 2, USE OF VALUE ASSESSMENT OF CERTAIN REAL ESTATE, OF CHAPTER 21, TAXATION, OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE WHEREAS, Article III, Division 2, of Chapter 21 of the Roanoke County Code provides for a use value assessment of certain real estate in order to preserve agricultural, horticultural, forest and open space uses within the County's boundaries consistent with the County's land use plan; and WHEREAS, the 1989 session of the General Assembly of Virginia enacted certain amendments to Article 4 of Chapter 32 of Title 58.1 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, to provide for uniform standards for real estate taxation to be prescribed by the Director of the Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, the Virginia Commissioner of Agriculture and Consumer Services, and the State Forester and other procedurals; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading and public hearing was held on September 26, 1989; a second reading was held on October 10, 1989, concerning amending Article III, Division 2, of Chapter 21 of the Roanoke County Code pertain to use value assessment and fee. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That Chapter 21, Taxation, of the Roanoke County Code be ~r amended by deleting the present Article III, Division 2 and reenacting a new Article III, Division 2, Use value assessment of certain real estate as follows: Sec. 21-51. Findings. The County of Roanoke finds that the preservation of real estate devoted to agricultural horticultural, forest and open space uses within its boundaries is in the public interest and, having heretofore adopted a land use plan hereby ordains that such real estate shall be taxed in accordance with the provisions of Conservation and Recreation the Virginia Commissioner of A ricultural and Consumer Service and the State Forester and this ordinance. Sec. 21-52. Applications for special assessment; fees. Sad A lications for taxation of real estate on the basis of use assessment shall be submitted to the real estate assessor on forms provided by the Virginia Department of Taxation and supplied b_v the real estate assessor The application shall include such additional schedules photographs and drawings as may be recruired by. the real estate assessor. ~b1 Applications shall be submitted: ~_ At least sixty (60) days preceding the tax year for which such taxation is sought; or S2 ~ In any year in which a general reassessment is being made, until thirty (30) days have elapsed after the notice of increase in assessment has been mailed to the property owner in accordance with Section 58 1-3330 of the Code of Virginia, or sixty S60) days preceding the tax year, whichever is later. ~_ The application shall be signed by all owners of the sub'ect ro ert An owner of an undivided interest in the ro ert ma a 1 on behalf of owners that are minors or that cannot be located upon submitting an affidavit attesting to such facts. u A separate application shall be filed for each parcel tract shown on the land book. ~ An application fee of Ten Dollars ($10.00) shall accompany each application. ~Z AnAn a~~lication may be filed within no more than sixtvmay be filed within no more than sixty ...1. "" (60) days after the filinct deadline specified in subparaaraph (b1 above upon payment of a later filing fee in the sum of Twenty Dollars (520.00). Sgt An a lication shall be submitted whenever the use or acreage of such land previously approved chances; provided however, that no application fee shall be required when a change in acreage occurs solely as a result of a conveyance necessitated by governmental action or condemnation of a portion of any land previously approved. If any tax on the land affected by an application is delinctuent when the application is filed, then the application shall not be acce ted. U on a en of all delin t taxes interest and penalties relating to such land the application shall then be treated in accordance with this section. u Such property owner must revalidate annually with the real estate assessor anY application previously approved. A revalidation fee of Ten Dollars (S10 00) shall accompany each application for revalidation every sixth year Late filing of a revalidation form must be made on or before the effective date of the assessment and accompanied with a late filinct fee of Twent Dollars X520). Sec. 21-53. Determination of use value and assessment. Sad Promptly upon receipt of an application, the_real estate assessor shall determine whether the subject property_meets the criteria for use value assessment and taxation under this ordinance Article 4 of Cha ter 32 of Title 58.1 of the Code of Virctinia, and the applicable standards prescribed thereunder by the Director of the De artment of Conservation and Recreation the Commissioner of A riculture and Consumer Services and the State Forester. ~_ Minimum acreage. ~_ Real estate devoted to: ~1 a ricultural or horticultural use shall consist of a minimum of five acres;. forest use shall consist of a minimum of twenty acres; Lc1 open space use shall consist of a minimum of five acres except that real estate adjacent to a scenic river a scenic hicrhway, a Virainia Byway or public property shall consist of a minimum of two acres. A scenic river, scenic .. highway Virainia Byway or public property under this paragraph means those which are listed in the State Comprehensive Outdoor Recreational Plan, also known as the Virainia Outdoors Plan a copy of which can be obtained from the Department of Conservation and Recreation 302 Governor Street, Suite 203, Richmond, VA 23219. ~_ The foregoing requirements for minimum acreaae shall be determined by adding together the total area of contiguous real estate excludin recorded subdivision lots titled in the same ownership For purposes of this section properties separated only by a public right-of-way are considered continuous. Scl In addition to meeting the foregoing requirements for minimum acreaae real estate devoted to open space use shall be: ~_ within an agricultural, a forestal, or an agricultural and forestal district entered into pursuant to Chapter 36 LSec 15 1 1507 et sect ) of Title 15 1 of the Code of Virainia, or ~_ subject to a recorded perpetual easement, restrictive covenant or equitable servitude that is held- by a public body and that promotes the open space use classification as defined in Sec 58 1-3230 of the Code of Virainia, or ~j_ subject to a recorded commitment meeting the standards prescribed by the Director of the Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation and entered into by the landowner with the County. If the real estate assessor determines that the property does meet such criteria he shall determine the value of such property for its qualifying use as well as its fair market value. lei In determining whether the subject property meets the criteria for "a ricultural use" or "horticultural use" the real estate assessor may request an opinion from the Commissioner of Agricultural and Consumer Services; in determining whether the subject property meets the criteria for "forest use" he may request an opinion from the State Forester; and in determining whether the subject property meets the criteria for "open space use" he m~ re est an o inion from the Director of Conservation and Recreation Upon the refusal of the Commissioner of Agriculture and Consumer Services State Forester or the Director of the Department of Conservation and Recreation to issue an opinion, or in the event of an unfavorable opinion which does not comport with standards set forth by the respective director the party aggrieved ma seek relief from an court of record wherein the real estate in question is located If the court finds in his favor it m~ .~ issue an order which shall serve in lieu of an opinion for the purposes of this ordinance. Sec. 21-54. Taxation based on qualifying use. The use value and fair market value of any qualifying property shall be placed on the land book before delivery to the treasurer. and the tax shall be extended from the use value. Continuation of valuation assessment and taxation based upon land use shall depend on continuance of the real estate in a qualifying use, continued payment of taxes as rectuired in Section 58 1-3235 and compliance with other requirements of Article 4 of Chapter 32 of Title 58.1 of the Code of Virginia the applicable standards prescribed by the Director of the Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation. the Virginia Commissioner of Agriculture and Consumer Services and the State Forester and this ordinance, and not upon continuance in the same owner of title to the land. Sec. 21-55. Indexing and filing of approved applications. The real estate assessor shall prepare and transmit to the clerk of the circuit court a list of all applications filed and approved under this division along with the original copy of such a lication. The clerk shall index the names in a book entitled "Land Use Tax Assessment Book" and file each application in this office The clerk shall be compensated at the rate of One Dollar ~ 1 00~ for filing and indexing each application or revalidation. Sec. 21-56. Delinquent taxes. If on June 1 of any year the taxes for any prior year on any _ . - -_ -___ -_L _ _ _w.._.. a..a of+that fact and the general provisions of Sec. 58.1-3235 of the Code of Virginia to the property owner by first-class mail. If after sending such notice such delinquent taxes remain unpaid on November 1, the treasurer shall notify the real estate assessor who shall remove such parcel from the land use proaram. Sec. 21-57. Change in use, zoning or area; roll-back taxes. There is hereb im osed a roll-back tax and interest thereon in such amounts as may be determined under Virainia Code Sec. 58.1- 3237 on real estate which has qualified for assessment and taxation on the basis of use under this ordinance, upon one or more of the following occurrences: ~ when the use by which it qualified changes to_ a more intensive use: when it is rezoned to a more intensive use as described in Sec 58 1-3237 of the Code of Virginia; or ~c1 when one or more parcels lots or oieces of land are se grated or s lit off from the real estate as described in Sec. 58 1-3241 of the Code of Virginia. Such additional taxes shall only be assessed against that ,portion of such real estate which no longer qualifies for assessment and taxation on the basis of use or zoning. Sec. 21-58. Failure to report changes; misstatements in application. ,Sad The owner of an real estate liable for roll-back taxes shall within sixty X60) days following a chance in use, report such change to the real estate assessor on such forms as may be rescribed. The real estate assessor shall forthwith determine and assess the roll-back tax which shall be paid to the treasurer within thirty (30) days of assessment by the owner of the property at the time the change in use which no longer aualifies occurs. Upon failure to report within sixty (60) days following such chan~c e 1.lv rag v v.. ~ ~ -- --- to ten (10~) percent of the amount of the roll-back tax an interest which penalty shall be collected as a Hart of the tax. In addition to such penalty for failure to make required report, there is hereby imposed interest of one-half (1/2~) percent of the amount of the roll back tax, interest and penalty for each month or failure thereof during which the failure continues. Any person making material misstatements of fact other than a clerical error in any application filed pursuant hereto shall be liable for all taxes in such amounts and at such times as if such ro ert had been assessed on the basis of fair market value as applied to other real estate together with interest and enalties thereon and he shall be further assessed with an additional penalty of one hundred (1000 percent of such unpaid taxes. The term "material misstatement of fact" shall have the same meanin as it has under Sec. 58.1-3238 of the Code of Virginia. Sec. 21-59. Application of Title 58 1 of the Code of Virginia. The provisions of Title 58 1 of the Code of Virginia a licable to local levies and real estate assessment and taxation shall be a licable to assessments and taxation hereunder mutatis ".~ mutandis including without limitation provisions relating to tax liens and the correction of erroneous assessments and for such ur oses the roll-back taxes shall be considered to be deferred real estate taxes. Sec. 21-60. Effective date. This ordinance shall be effective for all tax vears beainnin on and after January 1. 1990. ~IIIIIIIIillllllllllllllllllllllll111111~11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111j1 - _ - - - - - - - - APPEARANCE REQUEST _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ __ _ AGENDA ITEM NO. ' -~ ~ _ _ - - SUBJECT vR~~ ~a~~z~sm~~ ; ~~~ N~ ~~~ _ - _ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, so that I may comment. I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW. • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will _ _ decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. _ _ _ • Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Ques- bons of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. • All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. • Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments __ with the clerk. • INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED _ GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION __ FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. _ PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO DEPUTY CLERK - - _ _ NAME ~~ ~ ~ R ~ -~ Po w ~cL _ - S ~ L ~r~_ ADDRESS ~ ~ ~D t= QI~NKL~W ~ ~ PHONE ~g7-~~a~ mllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll 111 l IIIIIIIillilllllllllllllllllllilllllllllllllllllllllllllllllililllllillllllllllllll ACTION NUMBER ITEM NUMBER ~/- AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: October 10, 1989 SUBJECT: Appointments to Committees, Commissions and Boards COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Community Corrections Resources Board One-year term of Edmund J. Kielty, Alternate. His term expired August 13, 1988. Health Department Board of Directors The two-year term of Susan Adcock will expire November 26, 1989 Industrial Development Authority Four-year terms of Billy H. Branch, Cave Spring District, and W. Darnall Vinyard, Vinton District will expire on September 26, 1989. Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission Three-year term of Alice Gillespie, Hollins Magisterial District expired June 30, 1989. SUBMITTED BY: Mary H. Allen Clerk to the Board APPROVED BY: ~~~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: Yes No Abs Denied ( ) Garrett Received ( ) Johnson s~-y Referred McGraw To• Nickens Robers f •. ~.. ACTION N0. ITEM NUMBER `~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: October 10, 1989- AGENDA ITEM: Appointments to the Court Service Unit Advisory Council/Youth and Family Services Advisory Board COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: On December 13, 1988, the Board of Supervisors voted to continue this Board and appoint new members. Michael Lazzuri, Director of Court Services has contacted the present members of the Court Service Unit Advisory Council/Youth and Family Services Advisory Board to determine whether they wished to continue serving. The following terms expired in 1988 or will expire in 1989. Appointments to this committee are not made by magisterial district; however, the magisterial district is listed for each member. Two-year term of James L. Trout, Vinton Magisterial District, will expire March 22, 1989. Mr. Trout has not responded to Mr. Lazzuri's letter. Two-year term of Ted R. Powell, Cave Spring Magisterial District, will expire. March 22, 1989. Mr. Powell would like to be reappointed. Two-year term of Hoyt C. Rath, Vinton Magisterial District, will expire March 22, 1989. Mr. Rath does not wish to serve another term. Two-year term of Dr. Andrew Archer, Vinton Magisterial District expired March 22, 1988. Dr. Archer does not wish to be reappointed. In addition to the appointments listed above, it is necessary to appoint four youth members, one each from Cave Spring High School, Northside High School, Glenvar High School, William Byrd High School. Mr. Lazzuri recommends that these appointments run from September through September. Therefore, appointment made in . ~. 1989 will expire September 1, 1989. Thereafter all terms will expire September 1, coinciding with the school year. SUBMITTED BY: Mary H. llen Clerk to the Board APPROVED BY: C/~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator -------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: Yes No Abs Denied ( ) Garrett Received ( ) Johnson Referred McGraw To• Nickens Robers 2 ~,-y AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, OCTOBER 10, 1989 RESOLUTION N0. 101089-5 APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM L - CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That that certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for October 10, 1989, designated as Item L - Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 4, inclusive, as follows: 1. Request for Approval of Raffle Permit - Botetourt Jaycees 2. Confirmation of committee appointments to the Fifth Planning District Commission and the Grievance Panel. 3. Appropriation of additional overtime funds to increase enforcement activities in Boxley Hills 4. Approval of Special Leave Request for Workers' Compensation Injury - Carl Catron. 2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this resolution. On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor McGraw and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: y~~~~~ Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors 10/11/89 CC: File Sheriff Michael Kavanaugh Diane Hyatt, Director of Finance Reta Busher, Director of Management & Budget D. Keith Cook, Director of Human Resources ACTION N0. A-101089-5.a ITEM NUMBER l..-"~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF ROANOK~ OUNTY UADMINIOTRAT ON RCENTER COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE MEETING DATE: October 10, 1989 AGENDA ITEM• Request for approval of a Raffle Permit from the Botetourt Jaycees COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Botetourt Jaycees has regl ecatdon has lbeen mreviewed by dthe October 28, 1989.This app roved. Commissioner of Revenue and he recommends that it be app The organization has paid the $25.00 fee. STAFF RECOMMENDATI N: It is recommended that the application for a Raffle Permit be approved. SUBMITTED BY: Mary H. Allen Clerk to the Board APPROVED BY: ~:~ ,yam -~~ ~' ~~`'~- ~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ---- ------------------------------ - VOTE ----------- ACTION Yes No Abs Approved (x) Motion by: Bob L. Johnson/ x Garrett Denied ( ) Steven A. McGraw Johnson x Received ( ) McGraw x Referred Nickens x To: Robers x cc: File Bingo/Raffle File L-~ COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA COMMISSIONER OF THE REVENUE APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO CONDUCT RAFFLES OR BINGO Application is hereby made for a bingo game or raffle permit. This application is made subject to all County and State laws, ordinances, rules, and regulations now in force, or that may be enacted hereafter and which are hereby agreed to by the under- signed applicant and which shall be deemed a condition under which this permit is issued. All applicants should exercise extreme care to ensure the accura- cy of their responses to the following questions. Bingo games and raffles are strictly regulated by Title 18.2-340.1 et. sec. of the criminal statutes of the Virginia Code, and by Section 4-86 et. s_e~c. of the Roanoke County Code. These laws authorize the County Board of Supervisors to conduct a reasonable investiga- tion prior to granting a bingo or raffle permit. The Board has sixty days from the filing of an application to grant or deny the permit. The Board may deny, suspend, or revoke the permit of any organization found not to be in strict compliance with county and state law. Any person violating county or state regulations concerning these permits shall be guilty of a Class 1 misdemeanor. Any person who uses any part of the gross receipts from bingo or raffles for any purpose other than the lawful religious, charitable, community, or educational purposes for which the organization is specifi- cally organized, except for reasonable operating expenses, shall be guilty of a Class 6 felony. THIS APPLICATION IS FOR: (check one) RAFFLE PERMIT ~~ BINGO GAMES Name of Organization y~~x~>t ~ t< ,=G--.- ~ ~ ~~ ac :~ F ` Street Address ~~ ~ ~ `~~ r~ x '` = ~ Mailing Address \~ F C> S,~ c~u ~ `- _ ~ City, State, Zip Code ~~ ~ ~ ' `~~''~`"`' Purpose and Type of Organization f~.~C': ~.~'~ !=''~' c l ~ ', ~ `< <~,~~4.`,'` ~ When was the organization founded? ~,lt~~~ 1 ~.- ! Roanoke County meeting place? ~~c.~.~,~_, ~%~_„_~ C~~<~-',-~r.~rt-- Has organization been in existence in Roanoke County for two con- tinuous years? YES ~-~ NO Is the organization non-profit? YES l'' NO Indicate Federal Identification Number # ~-~;~-C~1_ =1__~- 1 ~ ~ ~Z_ \ Attach copy of IRS Tax Exemption letter. - ~-. ~,~, ~ ~,_<~ Officers of the Organization: President: ~I h,,....~. ~ ~, 4.c;~~,~ ; E Vice-President ~`~~~_~ `lcY~:`~- Address : ~ C~`~ ` _~ ~ ~_,.~C.~~.E ~~_~~~.~ Address : ~-\~~; ~y ~-~;=~. ~,,~,. «..; ~~ __ ~ _ Secretary: ~~ ,~t~ :<> '~-~f-.,~..., ,~ ~~~ Treasurer : '1°~~C` ~ ~ C~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~-~ Address : r'._- _, `~=~c~~ ~ ~~= Address : ~~~ ~ ~ ~,,._', ~: .~ ._~ C ~. -- ~ ~ ,_ Member authorized to be responsible for Raffle or Bingo opera- tions: Name ~', , ~,:~ ~~ 1~ ~-- - ;~~ 1 ~~ , r`,`~ Home Address~~.~~{ ~ ~-.a_,~-.~~~ ~ ~..:~- _ `r-;~_~,, ~ ~~ ~;~._ :: ~~<~, ~ `;, Phone ~'~ ~~>- `~1~;~ ~ Bus . Phone ~ =~ ~ U~ c~>~~ A COMPLETE LIST OF THE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF CURRENT MEMBER- SHIP MUST BE FURNISHED WITH THIS APPLICATION. -- ('~, ~~, ~ \ ~_ F-_ Specific location where Raffle or Bingo Game is to be conducted. RAFFLES: Date of Drawing:-c`~~ -- ~ ~ Time of Drawing ~ ~1`~ . ~r~ . BINGO: Days of Week & Hours of Activity: Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday From To From To From To From To From To From To From To 2 L-/ State specifically how the proceeds from the Bingo/Raffle will be used. List in detail the plansad or intended use of the proceeds. Use estimates amounts if neces Y • ~,~ r"r, cv ~.~ ,~,~.., ~i ~~~'~ ~, C-.,~<~~~ ~~ ~ T ~.~wc~ '~ 3 ~'~ BINGO: Complete the following: Legal owner(s) of the building where BINGO is to be conducted: Name: Address: County State Zip Is the building owned by a 501-C non-profit organization? Seating capacity for each location: Parking spaces for each location: ALL RAFFLE AND BINGO APPLICANTS MUST ANSWER QUESTIONS 1 - 19 1. Gross receipts from all sources related to the operation of Bingo games or Instant Bingo by calendar quarter for prior calen- dar year period. BINGO INSTANT BINGO 1st Quarter 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter Total 1st Quarter 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter Total 2. Does your organization understand that it is a violation of law to enter into a contract with any person or firm, associa- tion, organization, partnership, or corporation of any classifica- tion whatsoever, for the purpose of organizing, managing, or con- ducting Bingo Games or Raffles? .~,'~_.~- 3. Does your organization understand that it must maintain and file complete records of receipts and disbursements pertaining to Bingo games and Raffles, and that such records are subject to audit by the Commissioner of the Revenue? ~~-~ ~ `-~ 4. Does your organization understand. that the Commissioner of the Revenue or his designee has the right to go upon the premises on which any organization is conducting a Bingo game or raffle, to perform unannounced audits, and to secure for audit all re- cords required to be maintained for Bingo games or raffles? ~~4:. 4 5. Does your organization understand that a Financial Report must be filed with the Commissioner of the Revenue on or before the first day of November of each calendar year for which a per- mit has been issued?_~~~-`_> 6. Does your organization understand that if gross receipts ex- ceed fifty thousand dollars during any calendar quarter, an addi- tional Financial Report must be filed for such quarter no later than sixty days following the last day of such quarter? ~j~_ 7. Does your organization understand that the failure to file financial reports when due shall cause automatic revocation of the permit, and no such organization shall conduct any Bingo game or raffle thereafter until such report is properly filed and a new ermit is obtained? ~` < P (' -- 8. Does your organization understand that each Financial Report must be accompanied by a Certificate, verified under oath by the Board of Directors, that the proceeds of any Bingo game or raffle have been used for these lawful, religious, charitable, commu- nity, or educational purposes for which the organization is spe- cifically chartered or organized, and that the operation of Bingo games or raffles have been in accordance with the provisions of Article 1.1 of Chapter 8, Title 18.2 of the Code of Virginia? ~~ 9. Does your organization understand that a one percent audit fee of the gross receipts must be paid to the County of Roanoke upon submission of the annual financial report due on or before the f first of November? ~-( ~- ~~ 10. Does your organization understand that this permit is valid only in the County of Roanoke and only at such locations, and for such dates, as are designated in the permit application? ~_c 11. Does your organization understand that no person, except a bona fide member of any such organization who shall have been a member of such organization for at least ninety days prior to such participation, shall participate- in the management, opera- tion, or conduct of any bingo game or raffle, and no person shall receive any remuneration for participating in management, operation, or conduct•of any such game or raffle? y ~" 12. Has your organization attached a check for the annual permit fee in the amount of $25.00 payable to the County of Roanoke, Virginia? `{~ r 13. Does your organization understand that any organization found in violation of the County Bingo and Raffle Ordinance or §18.2- 340.10 of the Code of Virginia authorizing this permit is subject to having such permit revoked and any person, shareholder, agent, member or employee of such organization who violates the above to having such permit revoked and any person, shareholder, agent, member or employee of such organization who violates the above referenced Codes may be guilty of a felony? ~/4 N. 5 14. Has your organization attached a complete list of its member- ship to this application form? \!,r 15. Has your organization attached a copy of its bylaws to this application form? y ~ ~, - ~1 ~~ j ~. ~ ~ _ ~__ 16. Has the organization been declared exempt from property taxa- tion under the Virginia Constitution or statutes? If yes, state whether exemption is for real, personal roperty, or both and identify exempt property. ~j~~~,, - ~,v ~~-~ ~"~ c~~ r _ ~~ ; . 17. State the specific type and purpose of the organization. 18. Is this organization incorporated in Virginia? y`c-S If yes, name and address of Registered Agent: -~`~ 19. Is the organization registered with the Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Affairs pursuant to the Charitable Solicitations Act, Section 57-48 of the Virginia Code? ~_ ti '<-~~~ (If so, attach copy of registration.) Has the organization been granted an exemption from registration by the Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer .Affairs? (If so, attach copy of exemption.) ALL RAFFLE APPLICANTS DESCRIBE THE ARTICLES TO BE RAFFLED, VALUE OF SUCH ARTICLES, AND PROCEED TO NOTARIZATION. Article Description Fair Market Value 6 .~` ~.. ALL BINGO APPLICANTS MUST ANSWER QUESTIONS 20 - 27 BEFORE NOTARIZATION RAFFLE APPLICANTS, GO TO NOTARIZATION. 20. Does your organization understand that the bingo games shall not be conducted more frequently than two calendar days in any calendar week? 21. Does your organization understand that it is required to keep complete records of the bingo game. These records based on §18.2- 340.6 of the Code of Virginia and X4.98 of Roanoke County Code must include the following: a. A record of the date, quantity, and card value of instant bingo supplies purchased, as well as the name and address of the supplier of such instant bingo supplies, and written invoice or receipt is also required for each purchase of in- stant bingo supplies? b. A record in writing of the dates on which Bingo is played, the number of people in attendance on each date, and the amount of receipts and prizes on each day? (These records must be retained for three years.) c. A record of the name and address of each individual to whom a door prize, regular or special Bingo game prize or jackpot from the playing of Bingo is awarded? d. A complete and itemized record of all receipts and disburse- ments which support, and that agree with, the quarterly and annual reports required to be filed, and that these records must be maintained in reasonable order to permit audit? 22. Does your organization be conducted at such time as and only at such locations this application? 23. Does your organization understand that the gross receipts in the course of a reporting year from the playing of instant Bingo may not exceed 33 1/3$ of the gross receipts of an organization's Bingo operation? 24. Does your organization understand it may not sell an instant Bingo card to an individual below sixteen years of age? 25. Does your organization understand that an organization whose gross receipts from all bingo operations that exceed or are ex- pected to exceed $75,000 in any calendar year shall have been granted tax-exempt status pursuant to Section 501 C of the United States Internal Revenue Service? (Certificate must be attached.) understand that instant Bingo may only regular Bingo game is in progress, and at such times as are specified in 7 ~'" 26. Does your organedaorobeuonefilenwhichtauthorizescthis use cat pancy must be obta the proposed location? 27. Does your organization un ssr ofnahehfollowingoamounts are or merchandise valued in exce illegal? a. No door prize shall exceed twenty-five dollars. b. No regular Bingo or special Bingo game shall exceed One Hund- red dollars. c. No jackpot of any natu~otalaamountrofhjackpoteprio es awarded Dollars, nor shall the in any one calendar day exceed One Thousand Dollars. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * NOTARIZATION: THE APPLICANTS OATH MU5T BE TAKEN BY ALL I hereby swear or affirm under the penalties of perjury as set forth in §18. 2 of then theebest of mynknowledge a information band statements are true t beliefs. All questions have been answered. Signed by: w ^ Title Home Address Name ~~~ da of Sf"iJ+ 19= Subscribed and sworn before me, this• _ Y My commission expires: `- ' ~' 1 ' Notary P blic RETURN THIS COMPLETED APPLICATION TO: COMMISSIONER OF THE REVENUE p,O. Box 20409 Roanoke, VA 24018-0513 8 L-f NOT VALID UNLESS COUNTERSIGNED lication, having been found in due form, is approved The above app and issued to the applicant to have effect until December 31st o this calendar year. C~~ ~ ommis Toner t venue li ~ ~~/ ~~ Date The above application is not approved. Commissioner of the Revenue Date 9 ACTION # ITEM NUMBER ~, A-101089-5.b AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE October 10, 1989 SUBJECT: Confirmation of Committee Appointments to the Fifth Planning District Commission and Grievance Panel COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The following nominations were made at the previous board meeting and must now be confirmed by the Board of Supervisors. The nominee has agreed to serve. Fifth Planning District Commission Supervisor Nickens nominated Mrs. Pat Dean to serve a three year term as a citizen representative. Her term. will expire on June 30, 1992. grievance Panel Supervisor Robers nominated Kim Owen to another two year appointment. Her term will expire September 27, 1991. SUBMITTED BY: Mary H. Allen Clerk to the Board APPROVED BY: ~~ ~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ------------------------------------------ ACTION VOTE Approved (x) Motion by: Bob r JohnG~n/ Yes No Abs Denied ( ) Steven A McCraw Garrett _~ Received ( ) Johnson ~. Referred McGraw __~__ To• Nickens -x- Robers v cc: File Fifth Planning District Commission File Grievance Panel File ACTION # A-101089-5.c ITEM NUMBER +~"" AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: October 10, 1989 AGENDA ITEM: Appropriation of Additional Overtime Funds to Increase Enforcement Activities in Boxley Hills COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND: The Board of Supervisors has previously requested that the Sheriff's Department increase enforcement activities in the Boxley Hills area. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Sheriff has reviewed the cost of this additional enforcement and concluded that he will be able to provide this coverage by using off-duty deputies working Friday and Saturday night from 8:00 p.m, until 2:00 a.m. The cost of providing this level of service beginning October 1, 1989 for the remainder of the fiscal year would be $8,850. FISCAL IMPACT: During 1988-89 the Sheriff was able to collect fines and forfeitures revenues in excess of the amount that was budgeted. He anticipates that this higher collection effort will continue through the 1989-90 fiscal year. This additional revenue could be used to offset the expense of the additional overtime funds needed to cover the Boxley Hills area. L-.3 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends allocating $8,850 to the Sheriff's overtime budget and increasing revenues anticipated from fines and forfeitures by an equal amount. %U~C.QfrtSL ~. Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance 4' C' Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved (x) Motion by: Bob L. Johnson/ No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Steven A. McGraw Garrett x Received ( ) Johnson x Referred McGraw x To Nickens x Robers x cc: File Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance Reta Busher, Director, Management & Budget Michael F. Kavanaugh, Sheriff A-101089-5.d ACTION NUMBER ITEM NUMBER ~~' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: October 10, 1989 AGENDA ITEM: Approval of Special Leave Request for Workers' Compensation Injury - Carl Catron COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ,~-..~ ~ .~y----c BACKGROUND Carl R. Catron, Park Maintenance Foreman in the Department of Parks and Recreation, sustained a job-related injury on June 15, 1989, and approval by the Board of Supervisors for an extension of Workers' Compensation Leave is requested. Approval of a Special Leave Request permits regular employees to receive full pay and County benefits; and, in turn, employees must sign over any Workers' Compensation checks to the County. Mr. Catron's Workers' Compensation Leave will expire on October 26, 1989, unless additional leave is approved by the Board of Supervisors. Mr. Catron continues to have problems relating to his injury and is unable to return to work at this time. In accordance with Section VIII-C of the Employee Handbook, an additional sixty (60) work days may be granted by the Board of Supervisors. FISCAL IMPACT The total salary cost for sixty (60) work days, less Workers' Compensation payments returned to the County, is $1,781. The total fringe benefit cost for the sixty (60) days is $1,651. The total cost for salary and fringe benefits is $3,433. An appropriation of funds will not be required for this Special Leave Request. RECOMMENDATIONS ~.` The Director of Parks and Recreation and the Department of Human Resources recommend that the Special Leave Request be approved by the Board of Supervisors in accordance with the Employee Handbook. SUBMITTED BY: D. K. Cook Director of Human Resources ACTION APPROVED BY: C~~~ " Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator Approved (X) Motion by:Bob L. Johnson/Steven Denied ( ) A. McGraw Received ( ) Referred To VOTE No Yes Abs Garrett X _ Johnson x _ McGraw x _ Nickens x _ Robers x cc: File D. K. Cook, Director, Human Resources Steve Carpenter, Director, Parks & Recreation r. OF ~OANO'YF .~ t ~ z ~ v a 18 ~~~ 88 SFSQUlCENTENN~P~ A BcautifulBc~inning (nuuniy of ~uttnnkr , DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES M E M O R A N D U M T0: Stephen H. Carpenter Director of Parks & Recreation FROM: D. K. Cook Director of Human Resources DATE: September 19, 1989 SUBJECT: Carl R. Catron - Workers' Compensation Leave Carl Catron sustained a job-related injury on June 15, 1989, and was granted a special leave of 90 workdays which will end on Thursday, October 26, 1989. Mr. Catron continues to have problems relating to his injury and is unable to return to work at this time. ..~ ~~~ .cl,"r:: _ C' _ ! ... In accordance with Section VIII-C, Page 34, of the Employee Handbook, an additional sixty workdays may be approved by the Board of Supervisors. If a sixty-day extension is recommended, please indicate your recommen- dation on the bottom of this memo and return it to us by September 26, 1989, so that we can prepare a board report for the October 10 board meeting. If you have any questions regarding Carl Catron's leave status, please let us know. DKC/gm Attachment: Copy of Special Leave Request COMMENDED: Stephen H. Carpenter Director of Parks & Recreation COUI~TI'Y OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA UNAPPROPRIATID BALANCE - CAPITAL FUND Beginning Balance at July 1, 1989 September 12, 1989 Contribution towards Hollins Fire Truck Balance as of October 10, 1989 Subanitted by Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance $56,194 (25,000) 31 194 ~~ COUI~TI'Y OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA LINAPPROPRIATID BALANC'-E - GII~RAL FUND Balance at July 1, 1989 (Unaudited) $4,038,318 Balance as of Octo'r~er 10, 1989 Submitted by $4,038,318 Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance ~V- 3 cot~rn~ of ROAr1oxE, vuzcnalA RESERVE FOR BOARD CONTINGENCY Beginning Balance at July 1, 1989 Additional Amount from 1989-90 Budget June 14, 1989 Contribution to Va. Amateur Sports July 11, 1989 Purchase of drainage easement July 11, 1989 Option on 200 acres real estate July 25, 1989 Donation to Julian Wise Foundation August 8, 1989 County supplement for new position in Sheriff's department August 22, 1989 Part time volunteer coordinator August 22, 1989 Public Information for Police Department referendum Balance as of October 10, 1989 Su}~nitted by ~~~ ~ Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance $11,395 50,000 (25,000) (5,000) (3,750) (5,000) (869) (5,800) (9,000) $ 6,976 ACTION NUMBER /~/ ITEM NUMBER / ~ "' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUN'T'Y, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: October 10, 1989 A ITEM: Accounts Paid - September 1989 OOLINI'Y ADMINISTRATOR' S CONA~ETfrS: SUNY~IARY OF INFORMATION: Payments to Vendors: Payroll: 9/1/89 $398,868.27 9/15/89 391,579.12 9/29/gg 444,720.60 ACTION A detailed listing of the payments is on file with the Clerk to the Board of Supervisors. SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: ~ne~ Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance Approved ( ) Notion by: Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To $2,963,800.58 $1,235,167.99 $4,198.968.57 Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator VO'L'E No Yes Abs Garrett Johnson Nlc~raw Nickens _ Robers Q AT A REGULAR MEETIHELDF ATH THE ARpANOKES COUNTY OADM ONISTRATOON COUNTY, VIRGINIA, 1989 CENTER, ON TUESDAY, OCTOBER 10, RESOLUT OD INRTCONFORMITYUTWITHSETHE NCODETIOF WAS HE VIRGINIA WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia has convened an executive meeting on this date pursuant to an affirmative recorded vote and in accordance with the provisions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and WHEREAS, Section 2.1-344.1 of the Code of Virginia requires a certification by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia that such executive meeting were conducted in conformity with Virginia Law. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia hereby certifies that, to the best of each members knowledge: 1. Only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements by Virginia law were discussed in the executive meeting which this certification resolution applies, and 2. Only such public business matters as were identified in the motion convening the executive meeting were heard, ~, discussed or considered by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. y !,?: ,;, '1 ~~. ~. i' 1 ~_ County staff requests the Board to adopt a motion to enter into executive session within the provisions of the Virginia Freedom of Information Act as follows: (a) to discuss probable litigation or other specific legal matters requiring the provision of legal advice by the County Attorney and briefings by staff members concerning Consolidation, annexation, and the Town of Vinton in accordance with Sections 2.1-344 A 7 and 15.1-945.7 D of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended. F P~IwF z~ ~~ Z o a 51~~~ ~SQUICENTENN~P`. A BcautifulBcginning COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE Lnunfg of +~nttnnkr BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Ms. Kim Owens 3353 Forest Ridge Roanoke, Virginia Dear Ms. Owens: October 13, 1989 Road 24018 LEE GARRETT CHAIRMAN WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT RICHARD W ROBERS. VICE-CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT STEVEN A MCGRAW CATAW BA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C.NICKENS VIN TON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT The Board of Supervisors have asked me t revious s service r t ehthe their sincere appreciation for your p Grievance Panel. Citizens ive ofs themselves and their time bare community and willing to g indeed all too scarce. This is to advise that at their meeting held on Tuesday, October 10, 1989, the Board of Supervisors voted unanimously to reappoint you as a member of the Grievance Panel for a two-year term. Your term will expire on September 27, 1991. erson elected, re-elected, appointed State law provides that any p to any body be furnished a copy of the Freedom of ou arcopy ofAthe your 1989 copy is enclosed. We are also sending y 1989 Conflict of Interest Act. On behalf of the Supervisors and the citizen rec ationok forouyour please accept our sincere thanks and app willingness to accept this appointment. Sincerely, t~ Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors MHA/bjh Enclosures cc: Mr. D. Keith Cook, Director, Human Resources P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 2 4018-07 9 8 (703> 772-2004 Ps~CN1.~.F ~. .p Z o a 8 ~~ $8 gFS0U1CENTENN~P~ A Bcaati~ul Bcginning (~riltri~l~ II~ ~.~i]MriII~2P BOARD OF SUPERVISORS COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR Jul 14, 1989 ELMER C. HODGE y Mrs. Pat Dean 4329 Toddsbury Drive Vinton, Virginia 24179 Dear Mrs. Dean: LEE GARRETT. CHAIRMAN WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT RICHARD W ROBERS. VICE-CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L JOHNSON NOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT STEVEN A MCGRAW CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT This is to advise that at their meeting held on Tuesday, October 10, 1989, the Board of Supervisors voted unanimously to appoint you as a member of the Fifth Planning District Commission for athree- year term. Your term will expire June 30, 1992. State law provides that any person elected, re-elected, appointed, or re-appointed to any body be furnished a copy of the Freedom of Information Act; your 1989 copy is enclosed. We are also sending you a copy of the 1989 Conflicts of Interest Act. On behalf of the Supervisors and the citizens of Roanoke County, please accept our sincere thanks and appreciation for your willingness to accept this appointment. Very truly yours, Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors bjh Enclosures cc: Mr. Wayne Strickland Fifth Planning District Commission P. O. Box 2569 Roanoke, Virginia 24010 P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 2 4018-07 9 8 (703> 772-2004 ~ AN ,~.~ ~. ~~ a~ ~a ~~ as aEBQUiCENTENN\P~' A Beauti~ulBeginning COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE C~viYn~~ of ~vttnvke BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Mr. John Hubbard Assistant County Roanoke County P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, Virginia Dear John: October 13, 1989 Administrator 24018 LEE GARRETT CHAIRMAN WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT RICHARD W. ROBERS. VICE-CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT STEVEN A. MCGRAW CATAW BA MAG"~STERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors have asked me to express their sincere appreciation for your previous service to the Fifth Planning District Commission. Allow me to personally thank you for the time you served on this Commission. Citizens so responsive to the needs of their community and willing to give of themselves and their time are indeed all too scarce. Sincerely, Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors MHA/bjh Enclosure cc: Mr. Wayne Strickland Fifth Planning District Commission P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 2 4018-07 9 8 (703) 772-2004 ~C A~F ~~ ~ a 18 X50 88 8'F$QUICEN7ENN~P~' A Bcauti~ul Bcginning COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE (~nixn~~ of ~n~nnkr BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Mr. Winston FEwok 724 Stewart Avenue Roanoke, Virginia Dear Mr. FEwok: October 13, 1989 24013 LEE GARRETT. CHAIRMAN WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRCT RICHARD W. ROBERS. VICE-CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L JOHNSON HOLUNS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT STEVEN A- MCGRAW CATAW BA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT At their regular meeting on Tuesday, October 10, 1989, the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors unanimously approved the request of the Botetourt Jaycees for a Raffle Permit. The raffle will be conducted on October 28, 1989. The fee has been paid and your receipt is enclosed. You may consider this letter to be your permit, and I suggest it be displayed on the premises where the raffle is to be conducted. The State Code provides that raffle and bingo permits be issued on a calendar-year basis and such permits issued will expire on December 31, 1989. This permit, however, is only valid on the date specified in your application. If I may be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me at 772-2004. Sincerely, ~°~' Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisor bjh Enclosures cc: Commissioner of the Revenue Commonwealth Attorney County Treasurer P.O- BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 2 4018-07 9 8 (703> 772-2004 ..Mn:. . O~ ROAN ~,~ z~ o a? lv E~ 88 SFSQUICENTENN~P~ A Bututifu/8eginning COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE October 13, 1989 Rev. Charles R. Doyle Hollins Road Baptist Church 3502 Old Mountain Road, N.E. Roanoke, Virginia 24019 Dear Reverend Doyle: LEE GARRETT CHAIRMAN WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT RICHARD W. ROBERS. VICE-CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT STEVEN A. MCGRAW CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY G NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT On behalf of the Board of Supervisors, I would like to take this opportunity to let you know of our appreciation for your attending the meeting on October 10, 1989 to offer the invocation. We feel it is most important to ask God's blessing on these meetings so that all is done according to His will and for the good of all citizens. Thank you for sharing your time with us. bjh C~nixnt~ of ~v~tnnkr BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Since ely, ---.._ Le Garrett, Chairman Roanoke County Board of Supervisors P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24018-0798 (703) 772-2004 ~P AN~.~ z~ o az 18 ~~ 88 E'FSQUICENTENp~P A Bcautiful Bcginning COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE Mr. John R. Davy, Jr. Planning Bureau Manager Commonwealth of Virginia Department of Conservation 203 Governor Street, Suite Richmond, Virginia 23219 Dear Mr. Davy: October 13, 1989 and Recreation 326 LEE GARRETT. CHAIRMAN WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT RICHARD W. ROBERS. VICE-CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT STEVEN A. MCGRAW CATAW BA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT Attached is a copy of Resolution No. 101089-3 endorsing the designation of portions of State Route 311 as a Virginia Byway. This resolution was adopted by the Board of Supervisors at their meeting on October 10, 1989. If you need further information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, -~r~ air, .~• C~...C-~ Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors bjh Attachment cc: Jeffrey D. Johnson, Craig County Administrator Macon Sammons, Jr., Alleghany County Administrator John Williamson, Botetourt County Administrator R. L. Hundley, VDOT, Richmond C~vun~~ of ~vttnnkr BOARD OF SUPERVISORS P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24018-0798 (703) 772-2004 ADMINISTRATION NATURAL AREAS CONSERVATION PLANNING AND RECREATION RESOURCES SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION B. C. LEYNES, JR. STATE PARKS Director ~7~\f`~/[\/7~q r7I'-~+I~I--~~'{ 7/~' ~\~/7 '" ._ ®lralV'JL®1 7 ~'V JLe~~Y Y'~ ®y ~~~~~~~ DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION AND RECREATION DIVISION OF PLANNING AND RECREATION RESOURCES Art Buehler, Director 203 Governor Street, Suite 326 TDD (804) 786-2121 Richmond, Virginia 23219 (804) 786-2556 FAX: (804) 786-6141 September 19, 1989 A-PL-ZRD-89 VA Byways Mr. Elmer C. Hodge Roanoke County Administrator p.0. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 Dear Mr. Hodge: The purpose of this letter is to solicit the endorsement of the Roanoke Board of Supervisors for the designation of Route 311 as a Virginia Byway. Recently, in separate actions, the Botetourt County Board of Supervisors and the Greater Allegheny County Chamber of Commerce requested that a number of roads be consideCodntor athetlroads the Virginia Byway System. In Allegheny Y. requested are Routes 143 afaom11EagleteRockt tounthereBlueteRidge destination of Route Counties from Fincastle Parkway; Route 606 in Botetourt and Craig to Route 615; and Route 615 in Botetourt and Craig Counties from Eagle Rock to New Castle. The review team from this office and the Department of Transportation has evaluated the roads based upon these requests and found that they qualify for addition to the Virginia Byway System. The Vir iniad thatoRouteP311 westcofsI181dtoutheg West process and it was note Virginia state line, as well as the routes mentioned earlier is listed as a potential Virginia Byway• If the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors would endorse the concept, an area-wide group of roads could be desigio edofaalmost time. This group of roads could create a byway P 100 miles which would andavisitorsattractive drive through the region, for residents a o+~e e s~y~ J00597/PRR Mr. Elmer C. Hodge September 19, 1989 Page 2 For your information, we have enclosed copies of "A Guide for Virginia Byway Management" which. should help to answer your ph. 804-786-9042, will have staff questions. Mr. Derral Jones, responsibility for this project. He will be available if you have questions or need additional information. We thank you for your attention to this matter. Sinc rely, L-, /~-c~ John R. Davy, Jr. Planning Bureau Manager CDJ/km Enclosures (2) cc: Botetourt Co. Administrator Craig Co. Administrator g Count R11L.hHundley, VDOT Richmond J00597/PRR B. C. LEYNES, JR. Director ~ aq~ v ~~ ADMINISTRATION NATURAL AREAS CONSERVATION PLANNING AND RECREATION RESOURCES SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION STATE PARKS DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION AND RECREATION DIVISION OF PLANNING AND RECREATION RESOURCES Art Buehler, Director 203 Governor Street, Suite 326 TDD (804) 786-2121 Richmond, Virginia 23219 (804) 786-2556 FAX: (804) 786-6141 September 19, 1989 A-PL-ZRD-89 VA Byways Mr. Jeffery D. Johnson Craig County Administrator p,0. Box 308 New Castle, VA 24127 Dear Mr. Johnson: The purpose of this letter is to solicit the endorsement of the Craig County Board of Supervisors for the designation of Routes 311, 606, and 615 as Virginia Byways. Recently, in separate actions, the Botetourt County Board of Supervisors and the Greater Allegheny County Chamber of Commerce requested that a number of roads be consideCeodn~or athetlroads the Virginia Byway System. In Allegheny Yr requested are Routes 159 and 311. Botetourt County requested the destination of Route 43 from Eagle Rock to the Blue Ridge Parkway; Route 606 in Botetourt and Craig Counties from Fincastle to Route 615; and Route 615 in Botetourt and Craig Counties from Eagle Rock to New Castle. The review team from this office and the Department of Transportation has evaluated the roads based upon these requests and found that they qualify for addition to the Virginia Byway System. The Vir inia Outdoors Plan was consulted during this process and it was noted that Route 311 west of I-81 to the West Virginia state line, as well as the routes mentioned earlier is listed as a potential Virginia Byway. If the Craig County Board of Supervisors would endorse the concept, an area-wide group of roads could be designated at one time. This group of roads could create a byway loop of almost 100 miles which dents andavisitorsattractive drive through the region, for rest J00600/PRR Mr. Jeffery D. Johnson September 19, 1989 Page 2 For your information, we have enclosed copies of "A Guide for Virginia Byway Management" which should help to answer your questions. Mr. Derral Jones, ph. 804-786-9042, will have staff responsibility for this project. He will be available if you have questions or need additional information. We thank you for your attention to this matter. Sin ely, ~~ ohn R. Davy, Jr. Planning Bureau Manager CDJ/km Enclosures (2) cc: Botetourt Co. Administrator Roanoke Co. Administrator Allegheny County Administrator R. L. Hundley, VDOT Richmond J00597/PRR B. C. LEYNES, JR. Director ,, v ADMINISTRATION NATURAL AREAS CONSERVATION PLANNING AND RECREATION RESOURCES SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION STATE PARKS DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION AND RECREATION DIVISION OF PLANNING AND RECREATION RESOURCES Art Buehler, Director 203 Governor Street, Suite 326 TDD (804) 786-2121 Richmond, Virginia 23219 (804) 786-2556 FAX: (804) 786-6141 September 19, 1989 Mr. Macon C. Sammons, Jr. Allegheny County Administrator P.O. Box 917 Covington, VA 24426 Dear Mr. Sammons: A-PL-ZRD-89 VA Byways The purpose of this letter is to solicit the endorsement of the Alleheny County Board of Supervisors for the designation of Routes 311 and 159 as Virginia Byways. Recently, in separate actions, the Botetourt County Board of Supervisors and the Greater Allegheny County Chamber of Commerce requested that a number of roads be considered for addition to the Virginia Byway System. In Allegheny County, the roads requested are Routes 159 and 311. Botetourt County requested the destination of Route 43 from Eagle Rock to the Blue Ridge Parkway; Route 606 in Botetourt and Craig Counties from Fincastle to Route 615; and Route 615 in Botetourt and Craig Counties from Eagle Rock to New Castle. The review team from this office and the Department of Transportation has evaluated the roads based upon these requests and found that they qualify for addition to the Virginia Byway System. The Virginia Outdoors Plan was consulted during this process and it was noted that Route 311 west of I-81 to the West Virginia state line, as well as the routes mentioned earlier is listed as a potential Virginia Byway. If the Allegheny County Board of Supervisors would endorse the concept, an area-wide group of roads could be designated at one time. This group of roads could create a byway loop of almost 100 miles which would create an attractive drive through the region, for residents and visitors. J00600/PRR Mr. Macon C. Sammons September 19, 1989 Page 2 For your information, we have enclosed copies of "A Guide for Virginia Byway Management" which should help to answer your questions. Mr. Derral Jones, ph. 804-786-9042, will have staff responsibility for this project. He will be available if you have questions or need additional information. We thank you for your attention to this matter. Sincer ly, John R. Davy, Jr. Planning Bureau Manager CDJ/km Enclosures (2) cc: Botetourt Co. Administrator Roanoke Co. Administrator Craig County Administrator R. L. Hundley, VDOT Richmond J00597/PRR r. '' • / "~I [terns '~' s , ~s ~, r r' v ~ ~ ~ :rtt 'SPn„g% T'T~ _~. ~~ ~,y~ rt I (_) I~ 13 (~ (r (_ F~rlield ,.. I 92 ~, I, ;; rj` o e ~~~t'S]e ~ ,C '' s 111A504_.~I .,. 1 ,,. ~~, ~, ~ ~" ~g~,,l ,jam (?;~j I'i~. s1~ _ ~ na CLIFTQN ~! ~ T ~ ~6 j~ ,~ -a9 t rr,r~ s. 1 ~~ /~Q, 1 e,~~l g:Q`I F~.RGE ' 30 10 1,,1~ ,1,,;., r , ~,~r ~'~_ .; White' ulphisr~0 ~ a ~ s tit Dabney ~. 106.,,~'~' S r , _ Lencosrertg• ~g e T nR,,~hr .'r•.., I~ r t t ~4 5-52 $prirsgs ~ s 661t~t s0 Cnn,. Ccl~ ~ I610] J"' .• +... ~ 60 s ~_-->7 ~' .xz~,~/' . .Ito ~Jt~'~1, , 3i aeo FT. Callaghan •,, Y ~ ~ ~ LF~XINGTO 3 ~. et9 Z ~ . I,1 d ~ ]~•""1 Colllentown 51 °' / ~ ~1 C~V~II~GTO trerrow/Mo Lr1~.l.,l,~ _ - a ~+--r . !? R~r~. ~1rpd 4 ~5 ~ dNf. rr 151 5 (F1~]/ ~:~.. , ra 11] _WsE_ > 11 csxT 15! ~ .. + ~/ _;oF, r? `,of\p ~ 176A1s~ ~~' 60 ou~rorEN ~Ij a'. Cr7 ows I~1~] ~ -- `'~ I III 9 lner Jr~ +' A 1 so 5U t 1 Natrr n .o ~ coneys.: ~b(\ ,: A. L L - G H J N Y! s e t a~ BrrdgP. f~~? ,. 11 Jordan I-s l (~.~ -~_ CgwRn1.4 re stn\~;f 9 ~ atural Bride .7\'a Sweet Mine ~, +, riskany -` ~-~ ' Ea le Rock \, 49" i s o ,/ SCALE ~- tChalybetf a rr 7 s /~~ ~ o / ~. a , M -I (7c v m _ 50 MILES 1. ~ ~ ~ ~ ` Gt" ~ 1~ '. `o~ 45 ~ 1 J e •• --~ `~ li r ~ /t r ra 623 ?, cs~ ~c` 4 s . ' OttorCrfek rings , ~~ _ t~~ E3 p T F i' O' U R 1• Jo`~ ~ 123o FT.- Pedlar ~-~ ~.... r. 90bd 7 rs 61 ~ L ~ 48 ~ ~ Mills F?• Paint Benk ~~- s ` rp r Cevo Mrn. Lae tpG ,:;~ a _ ~/~~~/s,~ % 65~] ~Q 47 Rec. Are . s.• 3' t - r~F00Jt ,~,,J4ti0 FT. --"4~% (6 SI 4335}--~~, o ~61_~] Gr'` Peri Holcomb m 30' r 1611 Ve_ Mineral a 8u~h~n• ~~ a Gep r9 R k ~ ~~ Pe' t Benk '~"~ - ..~ a r' 151an ""' f Nat7~Fan's rtl7n. ~. ~ Spring E~slt ~~ • Q rr Ol Grcar Eastern Fish Natcheer}r"3$!7V"F S / "~ ~ , r ' Divide • ~51 - 8 New-6estle t Firteestl ~i~ 1 t f/ev.27O41r. _-- I~i~] r e J / (_~fJ`,-.. New Cosner etrone ~ , ! { Cretg ,i Cr ,. _~ 45I~40_ 0~' n (r~m ~ I I Spnn9e~~\•f• ,, .: ; fish Hatche ~ r?~j `~~ Lo'=~{`. ~~ 1~ . a-~" ra 4 1 la p aks alOt(e 1:IJ • '`'" a{~e~' rc ` Sinking ,~ L~~, .~ /~ ~ ~,c`rro"umue ra ~2 LYNC~IBU G k. ~ ~' Creek 11 ~~~~ 44- 11 ~ MonNele .;;77~.. 'i l 66~ ,~~~ .-in+C ' 200o FT. ~ atawbe ~ 43 111 ~ lover BIUB 7 . e wrAil 13 !T- 56 rs ~ t nob}Ibl 11 Sti dale Ridge ~(i 21 Fores c\ ,-/~e /~ r ~ J t 1 e ~s.• ie \/~C,~..--4>`~, (gyp 42~ 1 ~hifi r ~ ~ ~726jThaxton r BEDFORD: e1:1]/ ~,~ e...•• ' tJ ~) I• E Hollins ~ Q r ~] ' ,i~.,M,~~' ~ SALEM ' S ~_ '~ _ 55 25s40 OAIc ~ 619 ro ~~J B 1.,..,. ~ e/ L61I. ~wport •~ • 39 -' A5 ~ --- ~ 11 e ' wertsville q ~ ~¢~] F ~ Ill _ - BU ].!!~1~ , Vin orb s em psaburg ~ Dien. All s . lenvar t( 11 B E~ F R D ~' KS DiairCavcnts 11 1 ~A ~ Evington y3$ , o N. ! K, a I e 3 ro I ~'r. e ,~ ,~ .r P • ~ ~. 6113 2830 T. ~~_~ ~~o.~ 1 \ s s ~..] , 113] fo .. ; Eliston ~ ~ 11 t r 11i «1>>j. erg Mone _ \ a / ~~ (~ 6L.- t C ra o Huddles on ~ lynch t 1 (~ I T -.~(:) Ivl •. R 'f ~ ~ 1 11 f ° ~ B~oker T. 1 G`'~' (~`~~ ~-' 13 / e tatiori r r ~ Wa. rm fon n a ~ % Shewsvil~e ( 9 ~~~ ~ ~z.~ Bent Mountai _a s Nat' Mon. ~ ~ 1 Smi11"T`a. ~ 31r~~Alleghany. Adney ~---[~4E~, ~ ~ }hlounto1`, -\ Laesv I 1] 111 _, 111 Spring ~ ~ 1 GaP Burnt r, >> La(:(e_ s 16 ] Leesnv~e e Boone il~ ChimneY `~ 61Q'r ~ ~ \.if1j ~ ounrarn aka RI TIANSBURG ~ _ ~ - ~- j~l '; ' < tacP Par ~` (_ t 1 65b s 36 ~ I _ e ~'~~ Smrr - ~ Copper Hill ~~~ rr ~. y rL_~ 53 ~ s 693) Riner t _..--..._, _.. ~ A oma 9 _. `V''\,. U L. i s (~J 91. , 12 ~~ - ! ~: , ~lcesville rr 1~1~1~Check rs ~ ~ [611 ~ I e a ~~~~Jl~~~ ~,.~~e~~' ~~Loke ~ ~ ra ~~ 3 Cell way Rock~_ a II (/Penh ok~ T7 -P - r. _ , ount Gledehill T--~t~,, ~ ~pA1 - ! ]g.~SI~V e j71 ~Q 4`rE~~t.~~ r-._.~~]-a- _ t ! tC1r,!-L~ ~ 17a4, ~ POTENTIAL VIRGINIA BYWAYS ~ . EXISTING VIRGINIA BYWAY BOTETOURT CO. REQUEST GREATER ALLEGHANY CO. CHAMBER OF COMMERCE REQUEST IDENTIFIED IN THE 1989 VOP a Renan~ 9-28-89 John Chambliss: Notes from Mr. Hodge 1, Call Yvonne Willis and invite her to come to next board meeting. 2, Attached sheet should be part of second reading of ordinance about sale of acres in Glenvar West. He said you should help write the second ordinance. Brenda cc : ~1~ ~-20-89 Steve McGraw: Park at G~eeneHilllParke the funds from Shamrock Elmer Hodge ROANOKE COUNTY PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT GREEN HILL PARK DEVELOPMENT - PHASE II I• EXISTING FENCING Relocate Glenvar ballfield fencing to .$ 8,600.00 Green Hill Park facilities (contract)...... II. DUGOUT FENCINg g la er's Provide du out fencin and p y benches - four (4) existing Green „ •..$ 3,800.00 Hill Park ballfields ................. • .. ...$ 42,400.00 III. ,,, OUTDOOR SOCCER FIELD (1) .••••••••• d ,•,,, $ Professional services (design an 6,000.00 •. survey services) ............. " • S 000.00 30 . Construction (contract). •• " " $ .. , 800.00 Goals/Nets ...................... •$ Associated parking (gravel base/ 5,500.00 • chip and seal) ................... NO OUTFIELD F T BALL BASEBALL FIELD (~ ENCING).S 39,400.00 IV. S Professional services (design and 5,600.00 •• survey services).•••••••" " •'••• S 000.00 28 , Construction (contract).••••••• " ' e/dugout fencing..S li , 5,800.00 n Backstop/foul V, PARK DISTRICT MAINTENANCE CENTER (1)•• " $ •5 800 00 19,000.00 Building (prefab - force account)::$ , . 3,000.00 Access (gravel)..••••••••" " ' S 4,400.00 . Compound fencing/gate......... " " S 200.00 3 . Compound base (gravel)............ ...5 , 2,600.00 Electrical ...................... VI. ••.$ PARK CONCESSION RESTROOM/STORAGE FACILITY 70,500.00 (CONTRACT).. " " •'~• .desi•n....S es - g i ••• ••3,5OO.0O c Professiional serv - building (prefab)...5 34,000.00 Construction ter well/electricity.S 23,000.00 Utilities - wa - installed......5 10,000.00 Restroom fixtures ...$ 18,800.00 VII PLA(PURCHASEPANDAINSTALOATIONRM)CONTRACT)•••• ,•,,,,,,,,,,.$ 22,600.00 VIII, PICNIC SHELTER (CONTRACT)....••••• Shelter - prefab (including concrete base) 24' x 30' min.......$ 15,100.00 ,,.$ 4,500.00 Construction.......••••••••' " '• .$ 1,800.00 Picnic tables........••••• " " " $ 1,200.00 Gri'_ls/receptacles ................ IX. SPLIT RAIL SECURITY FENCING (2-RAIL)............ ~1 000.0 S _ , X, PARK ,,,. SIGNAGE/LANDSCAPING..•• " " " ~~~ $ 4,800.00 $235,900.00 9-28-89 Mary Allen _ Mr. Robers called and said that the would like to have a resolution prepared for next meeting commending APCO workers for their performance in recent emergency situation. I told him I agreed the actual workers did a good'job and worked hard to restore power but thought the administration needed next time if an emergency came to put on more phone lines as we answered a tremendous number. of callers who could not get to APCO. Brenda .v... - .. .. -_ ACTION N0. ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR HELD IAT THE ROANOKER COONTY ADMINI OTRP,TO ON RCENOER COUNTY, VIRGINIA MEETING DATE October 10, 1989 AGENDA ITEM: Appointments to the Court Service Unit Advisory Council/Youth and Family Services Advisory Board COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: On December 13, 1988, the Board of Supervisors voted to continue this Board and appoint new members. Michael Lazzuri, Director of Court Services has contacted the present members of the Court Service Unit Advisory Council/Youth and Family Services Advisory Board to determine whether they wished to continue serving. The following terms expired in 1988 or will expire in 1989. Appointments to this committee are not made by magisterial district; however, the magisterial district is listed for each member. Two-year term of 22am 1989. TMoutTroutn has notlsrespond dl to 1Mr. will expire March , Lazzuri's letter. Two-year term ofr hd22• 1 9891 Mre SpPowelMagwouldl like stolcbe will expire Ma reappointed. Two-year term of 1989 • C. MRatRathldoes note wish ato Dservec another expire March 22, term. Two-year term of Dr. Andrew Archer, Vinton Magisterial District expired March 22, 1988. Dr. Archer does not wish to be reappointed. In addition to the appointments listed above, it is necessary to appoint four youth members, one each from Cave Spring High School, Northside High School, Glenvar High School, ointmentsBrudn High School. Mr. Lazzuri recommends that these oPP ment made in from September through September. Therefore, app ~.. t~ r~ 1989 will expire September 1, 1989. Thereafter all terms will ;, ~. expire September 1, coinciding with the school year. ` 1:. SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: '' Mary H. Allen Elmer C. Hodge Clerk to the Board County Administrator s: __________ -------------------- VOTE ACTION Yes No 1~bs Approved ( ) Motion by: Garrett Denied ( ) Johnson Received ( ) McGraw Referred Nickens To: Robers 2 ;~ 4 1- i /. } ~~~' r ~~ ~4 i:. u rl I~ ~~'', I ~, .,.`.: .~l~pp,, 'r 3{ ' ,~ ~' „ ~. 2 ~. w F p AN ~ L Z~ ~s ~~ a~sOU1CEN7ENN~'~ A Btayli fw/Be~irmil~ COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C HODGE (~ma~fg of ~Rn~nnke BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ROANORE COUNTY BOARD OF SIIPERVISORS ACTION AGENDA BEPTEMBER 26, 1989 LEE GARRETT. CHA:RvAN WINDSOR MILLS MAGISTERIAL .7+_~'=CT RICHARD W. ROBERS. VICE•CHA:Ra+AN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL pK'a{T BOB L. JOI,I~ON MOLLINS MAGISTERIAL D'= -{T -~ STEVEN A MCG=sw CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DS={' HARRY C. NICKE'~5 VINTON MAGISTERIAL D~5'o{T Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meeting. Regular meetings are held on the second Tuesday and the fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public hearings are held at 7:00 p.m. on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:06 P.M.) 1. Roll Call. Bob L. Johnson Absent 2. Invocation: The Reverend Gordon Grimes Cave Spring Baptist Church 3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag. B. REQIIESTB TO POSTPONE, ADD TO, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS LG ADDED 1.A. REPORT ON DAMAGE ASSESSMENT FROM HURRICANE HIIGO C. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS, AND ANARDS 1. Proclamation Declaring the week of October 9 - 15, 1989 as Fire Preventive Week. LG/HCN TO APPROVE PROCLAMATION URC WITH BLJ ABSENT 2. Resolution of Congratulations to the Vinton First Aid Crew on their 50th Anniversary. R-92689-1 HCN/SAM TO APPROVE RESO URC WITH BLJ ABSENT PO. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24018-0798 (703) 772-2004 3. Recognition of Tim Gubala for his community involvement. PRESENTED BY ECH. TG CHAIRMAN OF NEW AMBASSADORS GROIIP, FORMED BY REGIONAL CHAMBER, AND PRESIDENT OF VIRGINIA ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION. D. NEW BIISINE88 1.A. Report on Damage Assessment from Hurricane Hugo. (1) LG, AS DIRECTOR OF EMERGENCY SERVICES, BRIEFED THE BOARD ABORT THE RECENT SITIIATION. (2) ECH THANKED AND RECOGNIZED COIINTY EMPLOYEES WHO PROVIDED ASSISTANCE DIIRING THE STORM. (3) CHIEF T. C. FDQIIA, FIRE & RESCIIE, PRESENTED AN OVERVIEW OF THE LAST FEW DAYS. DAMAGE ESTIMATES ARE NEARLY $1.4 MILLION FOR THE COIINTY; $954,000 TO PRIVATE PROPERTY AND $407,000 TO PIIBLIC PROPERTY. (4) LOWELL GOBBLE, DIRECTOR, VPI/SII E%TENSION SERVICE, PRESENTED A REPORT ON THE AGRICIILTIIRAL DAMAGE ESTIMATED TO BE $122,000. (5 ) LG DIRECTED ECH TO CONFER WITH STAFF TO FIND WAYS TO HELP PEOPLE MOST DIRECTLY AFFECTED TO CLEAN IIP AND GIVE SOME CONSIDERATION WITH REGARD TO TAB RELIEF. 1. Request for support for the United Way Campaign. A-92689-2 HCN/SAM TO APPROVE STAFF RECOMMENDATION OF SIIPPORT URC WITH BLJ ABSENT. 2. Presentation on CORTRAN by Curtis Andrews, Director of RADAR. PRESENTED BY CORTIS ANDREWS 3. Request for additional funding for the Old Hollins Road Water Improvement Project. A-92689-3 HCN/SAM TO APPROVE STAFF RECOMMENDATION FOR FIINDING IIRC WITH BLJ ABSENT 4. Funding for utility construction at economic development sites. 2 A-92689-4 gCN/SAM TO APPROVE STAFF RgCO~ENDATION FOR FUNDING ORC WITH BLJ ABSENT E. REQIIEBTS FOR WORK SESSIONS. NONE g, REQIIESTB FOR PIIBLIC HEARINGS. NONE G. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS SUPERVISOR ROWERS: (1) RECEIVED LETTER FROM DR. WILSON NOTIFYING THAT ROANORE COUNTY STUDENTS WITG TO STARTRWORRING ONI BETTING RUP FREE PLEDGE NE%T WEER. ( ) MEETING WITH ECONOMIC DEB 8 pN~E88E8 DURING NEgT~COUPLE WEE 8. O (3 ) PLANS WITH DEVELOPERS AND GAVE UPDATE ON SMART HIGRHW~ PRARRAN~GB •CONGRESBIONAL DELEGATAION TO PURBIIE THIS AND WILL T MEET WITH SECRETARY SUICRER~THAN•ANTICAIPA~TED. OF TRANSPORTATION. PROJECT MOVING AHEAD Q SIIPERVI80R MCGRAW: (1) CONGRATIII,ATED RR FOR FORWARD THINKING REGARDING THE SMART HIGHWAY. (2) REPORTED ON GRAYSON COMMISSION PIIBLIC HEARING HELD SEPTEMBER 25 AT VIRGINIA WESTERN. pgESENTATIONB BY LG AND MR. MU88ER WERE CONSTRUCTIVE AND RECEIVED VERY ~rT,L. (3) COMMUNITY MEETING OF MONTCLAIR ESTATES RESIDENTS LAST WEDNESDAY GAVE STAFF AND RESIDENTS BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF PROBLEMS. (4) NOTED RT ~~ IN HOLLINS.BE(5) RECEIVED PETITION ENGINEER FOR DRAINAGE WO FROM RESIDENTS CONCERNS SES ~ QUESTED IT PBSRBROUGH A T RAT ESPECIALLY FOR SCHOOL ATTENTION AB SOON AS POSSIBLE. BIIPERVISOR NICRENS: (1) QUESTIONED WHY THERE SAB BEEN NO SIGNED AGREEMENT WITS ANY VENDOR FOR CONSOLIDATED AUTOMATED LIBRARY ALTHOIIGH THE COUNTY APPROVED THIS RECENTLY UNDER DEADLINE TO GET LOWEST BID. ASKED FOR IIPDATE. ECH COMMENTED THAT THE CITY IB DOING ADDITIONAL ANALYSIS OF THE SITUATION TO FIND WAYS OF SAVING MONEY. HCN MOVED TO ASR ECH TO MARE THE APPROPRIATE CONTACTS TO (1) ASSUME THE LEADERSHOP~OC ST EFFECT VE MANNER( TBAN ORIGINALLY AUTOMATED SYSTEM IN A M PROPOSED. SECONDED BY LG URC WITH BLJ ABSENT. SUPERVISOR GARRETT: (1) DISCUSSED THE CONCERNS OVER STATUS OF PERSONNEL SHOIILD A DIVISrO~gFN pEMBER REFERENDUM E ROANORE COIINTY DEPARTMENT TARE PLACE I 3 WILL PROVIDE FOR THE CONTI~ NG THE T~8 ~N ASSWELLRIIS '1'HO $ BENEFITS OF ALL PERSONNB CONTINIIING WITH THE BHE p$R80N OIF~FDICCliN 88 TAKEN AS A a ILl~iRA~I'PEE OF ALTERED BY ANY I1ICOMIN RETENTION. nY HCN. IIRC ~~ THAT Tgg BOARD BDPPORT THIS POSITION. SECONDEr _ ••T~ n~ ABSENT. HCN ASKED THAT WE TRANSMIT EFFORTS O STBD T~~ T PART TO THE EMPD ~TSNE%TTEMPLOYEEBFADVISORYEMEETING.4 ECH BRING THIB H. APPOINTMENTS 1. Community Corrections Resources Board 2. Fifth Planning District Commission HCN NOMINATED MRB. PAT DEAN. 3. Grievance Panel RWR NOMINATED RIM OWENB FOR REAPPOINTMENT. 4. Industrial Development Authority. 5. Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission 6. Court Service Unit Advisory Council/Youth and Family Services Advisory Board. I. CONBENT AGENDA R-92689-5 HCN/SAM TO ADOPT REBOLIITION IIRC WITH BLJ ABSENT ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSIONENDA AND ILL BBE CONS DERED SEP MARA ELY~.OM THE CONSENT AG 1, Approval of Raffle Permit - Roanoke County Parks and Recreation - Therapeutic Section. A-92689-5.a HCN/SAM IIRC WITH BLJ ABBENT 2. Approval of Raffle Permit and Bingo Game - Cave Spring Elementary School PTA. A-92689-S.b 4 HCN/SAM IIRC 11ITH BLJ ABSENT 3. Resolution o que~oin names newgibridge pa nIDe Wabun Transportati Community. A-92689-S.C HCN/SAM IIRC 11ITH BLJ ABSENT J. CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMIINICATIONS 1. Richard Blankenship, 2920 Penn Forest Blvd, drainage complaint. LG DIRECTED ECH TO MEET WITH MR. BLANRENSHIP AND STAFF TO RESOLVE THE PROBLEM. %. REPORTS HCN/SAM TO RECEIVE AND FILE IIRC WITH BLJ ABSENT 1. Capital fund Unappropriated Balance. 2. General Fund Unappropriated Balance. 3. Board Contingency Fund. 4. Status Report on the Pinkard Court Planning Grant. i,,. EBECDTIVE SESSION pursuant to the Code of Virginia, Section 2.1-344. NONE M. CERTIFICATION OF E%ECIITIVE SESSION NONE DINNER RECESS - 4:00 P.M. EVENING SESSION (7:00 P.M.) N. PIIBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES Ordinance amending and reenacting Article III, 989-1 Division 2, Use of Value Assessment of Certain Rea 5 Estate, of Chapter 21, Taxation, of the Roanoke County Code. ONB CITISEN 8PO1C$ SAM/RR TO APPROVE FIRST BETIDING AND BEFORE SECOND READING, HAVE ANSWERS IN WRITING FOR CITISEN WITH COPIES TO THE BOARD IIRC WITS BLJ ABSENT SECOND READING - 10/10/89 O. POBLIC HEARINGS-AND SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 989-2 Petition of Lingerfelt Development Corp. to conditionally rezone a .493 acre track from A-1 Agricultural to M-1, Industrial with Special Exception Permit, for parking, landscape and drainage/retention, located northwest of the intersection of Peters Creek Road and Valleypointe Parkway in the Hollins Magisterial District. 0-92689-6 HCN/RR TO APPROVE ORD AY88: RR, HCN, LG ABSTAIN: SAM ABSENT: BLJ 989-3 Petition of Eagle Equipment Company to conditionally rezone a .409 acre tract from B-2 to B-3 Business, with Special Exception Permit to operate a construction equipment sales and rental business, located at 5449 Franklin Road in the Cave Spring Magisterial District. 0-92689-7 RR/HCN TO APPROVE ORD IIRC WITS BLJ ABSENT 989-4 Petition of Merrill Construction requesting vacation of a stormwater management easement and access easement, recorded in Plat Book 10, Page 17, section 9, Montclair Estates Subdivision, and located in the Catawba Magisterial District. 0-92689-8 ONE CITIZEN SPORE FOR RESIDENTS CONCERNING MONTCLAIR ESTATES DRAINAGE PROBLEMS SAM/RR TO APPROVE ORD URC WITH BLJ ABSENT 989-5 Petition of F.F.E. Development Corporation requesting vacation of a portion of a slope easement, varying in width from 30 to 50 feet, as shown on Lot 9, Block 2, Section 2, Fairway Forest Estates, recorded in Plat Book 10, Page 122, Windsor Hills Magisterial District. 0-92689-9 6 LG/RR TO APPROVE ORD IIRC WITH BLJ ABBENT ggg-6 Petition of Ogden Professional Park requesting vacation of a 10 foot waterline easement located on Tax Mapok $ Oe pa a 80 ?located in the Cave Spring Deed Bo - g Magisterial District. 0-92689-10 RR/HCN TO APPROVE ORD AYES: RR, HCN, LG ABBTAIN: BAI+i A88ENT: BLJ ggg-~ Petition of Carole P. Smith requesting vacation of a 12 foot P.U.E. easement located on Lot 1, Block 2, Section 1, Castle Rock West Subdivision, recorded in Plat Book 8, Page 63, located in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District. 0-92689-i1 LG/ HCN TO APPROVE ORD IIRC WITH BLJ ABSENT p. FIRBT READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance authorizing the sale of 10 acres in the Glenvar West section of Roanoke County. HCZt/LG TO APPROVE FIRST READING IIRC WITH BLJ ABSENT SECOND READING - 10/10/89 Q. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance amending Section 12.34 of the Roanoke County Code to prevent payment of fines assessed under this section without proof of purchase of a County license decal. 0-92689-12 HCN/RR TO APPROVE ORD IIRC WITH BLJ ABSENT 2. Ordinance amending and readopting Chapter 12, Motor Vehicles and Traffic, Section 12-8, of the Roanoke County Code, adopting provision of Title 46.2 and 18.2 of the Code of Virginia. 0-92689-13 gA1ri/RR TO APPROVE ORD URC WITH BI,J ABSENT 7 3. Ordinance amending the Roanoke County Code, Section 4-90, 4- f 'Article V,d Bingo Gameseand Raffles of 4-101, o Chapter 4, Amusements. 0-92689-14 gC~T~BAIt TO APPROVE URC WITS BLJ ABSEltT R. CITIZENB~ COMMENTS AND Cpl„~UNICATIONS 1~ ERNEST C. HEDRICR REQUESTED TH8 RESULTS OF THE DRAINAGE STUDY WHICH WAS TO BE DONE ON BUCR MOUriTAIN ROAD. 2. JOHNIECE BLANRENSHIP, DRAINAGE ON BUCK MOUr1TAIN ROAD. ECH WILL FOLLOWUP WITH STAFF AND CITIZENS. g. ADJOURNMENT HCN/LG iJVV AT 8:25 P.M. 8 RESOLIITION. COUNTY STAFF INVOLVED IN THE CELEBRATION WERE ALSO RECOGNIZE . D. NEW BUSINESS 1. Report on operations for the year ended June 30, 1989. A-91289-3 HCN/RR TO APPROVE STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS - URC. LG DIRECTED STAFF TO STUDY FENS ON WHETHER THEY WOULDNPREFER TO ESTATES TAXES AND TO POLL CITIZ 0 ~D MAINTAIN CURRENT LEVEL OF SERVI BES L VEL pF SERVICES EVEN IF THERE / SERVICES, OR INCREA ..J 1 THEREFORE, / ~rgE TAX INCREASES - BRING BACK IN 30 TO ~5 DAY . 2, Approval of Economic Development Action Plan for 1989-90. R-91289-4 - URC. BLJ/HCN TO APT RINGLWITH EcoN MICRDEVELOPMENTPA VISORY GROUP TO V TWG TO SET UP MEET ~~ DISCUSS PLAN. BLJ DIRECTED ST~wITH~ ACCESS PROADSIANDY WATEROSAND ~U~"' INVOLVED IF COUNTY WENT FORWARD SEWER. 3, Recommendations for Stormwater Management Program. A-91289-5 BLJ/SAM TO APPROVE STAFF RECOMMENDATION - URC. ~0 / 8TAFF TO BRING BACK COST FIGURES ON AN ENGINEERING STUDY WITHIN THE /U NEST 30 DAYS. STAFF TO CONTACT OTHER LOCALITIES TO iISCUSB POSSIBILITY OF REGIONAL STORMWATER MANAGEMENT.PR~O(G ~~ L"~ to ee `flental insurance. q, Authorization to provide p Y A-91289-6 SAM/BJH TO APPROVE GOING FORWARD WITH PROPOSALS AND BRING BACK T BOARD FOR APPROVAL OFLGLAN• AYES: BLJ, RR, SAM, NAYB: HCN 5. Acceptance of state matching grant for implementation of a recycling project through the State Energy Conservation Program. A-91289-7 SAM/HCN URC 2 COMMITTEE VACANCIES IN 1989 JANUARY Youth and Family Two year term of Hoyt C. Rath, Vinton District, will expire 1/26/89. Court Service Unit Advisory Council Services Advisory Board FEBRUARY Electoral Board - Appointed by the Courts MARCH Three year term of Mrs. May Johnson will expire 2/28/89. /Youth and Family Two year terms of James L. Trout, Cave Spring District, Red R. Powell, Cave Spring District, and James K. Sanders, Windsor Hills District, will expire 3/22/89• Court Service Unit Advisory Council Services Advisory Board League of Older Americans One year term of Webb Johnson, County Representative, will expire 3/31/89. JUNE Board of Zonin A eats - A ointed b Jud e of Circuit Court Five Year term of Neil W. Owen will expire 6/30/89. Fifth Plannin District Commission Three year terms of Richard W. Robers, Fred Anderson and John Hubbardx irei6/30/ggresentative and Executive Committee will e p Parks & Recreation Advisory Commission Three year terms of Vince Joyce, Cave Spring District, Alice Gillespie, Hollins District, and Thomas Robertson, Vinton District, will expire 6/30/89. SEPTEMBER Court Service Unit Advisor Council/Youth and Famil ServirPG Advisory Board Youth Members from Cave Spring, William Byrd, Glenvar High and Northside High Schools to be appointed. Industrial Development Authority Four year terms of Billy H. BarachVinton District will District, and W. Darnall Viny expire 9/26/89. Grievance Panel Two year term of Kim Owens will expire 9/27/89. NOVEMBER Health De artment Board of Directors Two year term of Susan Adcock will expires 11/26/89. DECEMBER r.~brarv Board Four year term of Richard Kirkwood, Hollins District, will expire 12/21/89. Mr. Kirkwood resigned 12/88. Mental Health Services of the Roanoke Valle Communit Services Board ear term of Sue Ivey, County appointee, will Three y expire 12/31/89. Roanoke Count Plannin Commission Four year term of Wayland Winstead, Catawba District, will expire 12/31/89. • Roanoke County Resource Authority Initial terms of Lee Garrett, Bob L.1989nson and Henry C. Nickens will expire December 31, Re Tonal Partnershi Site Advisor Committee Three year term of Charles Saul will expire 12/21/89• ACTION NUMBER ITEM NUN~ER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF T ~O~ CO~TY MINISTRATION RCENTER COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE RO MEETING DATE: September 26, 1989 SUB~_ Appointments to Committees, Commissions and Boards UNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: C mmunit Corrections Resources Board One-year term of Edmund J. Kielty, Alternate. His term expired August 13, 1988• Fifth Plannin District Commission ear term of John Hubbard, Citizen Representative and Three-y Executive Committee member expired June 30, 1989• `~ c~.~ C ~ ther term. ' ~ t~ Mr. Hubbard does not wish to serve ano U~„~-vv., h'~ Grievance Panel Two-year term of Kim Owens~~ ~ expire on September 27, 1989. Industrial D~ ev~lopment Authority Branch, Cave Spring District, and W. Four-year terms of Billy H. Darnall Vinyard, Vinton District will expire on September 2 , 1989. Parks and Recreation Advisor Commission Three-year term of Alice Gillespie, Hollins Magisterial District expired June 30, 1989. ~ ~ -s SUBMITTED BY: Mary H. Allen Clerk to the Board APPROVED BY: ~,c ~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator -------- ------------------- -- VOTE -------- ACTION Yes No Abs Approved ( ) Motion by: "r° '`J Garrett Denied ( ) Johnson Received ( ) McGraw Referred _ Nickens To:_- Robers O~ POANps.~ ~ ,F A Z z J ~ a 18 ,'~~ 88 SFSQUICENTENN`P A Bcauti~ulBeginning COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE August 21, 1989 Rev. Charles R. Doyle Hollins Road Baptist Church 3502 Old Mountain Road Roanoke, Virginia 24019 Dear Reverend Doyle: LEE GARRETT. CHAIRMAN WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT RICHARD W. ROBERS. VICE-CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT STEVEN A. MCGRAW CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT On behalf of the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors, I would like to thank you for giving the invocation at the Board Meetings in the past. We would again like to call on you to presentoutarelunablelto do Tuesday, October 10, 1989, at 3:00 p.m. If y ou soon to this, please call me at 772-2005. I will re f you gw uld prefer see if this time is acceptable to you, another date. The Board member volunteering thewtimeyt o off r God's blessinghat appreciate your their meetings. Sincerely, Brenda J. Holton, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors 9/~a/xr ~/, ~~ C~nixnt~ of ~,~v~nn~e BOARD OF SUPERVISORS P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 2 4018-07 9 8 (703) 772-2004 P' ~ PROCLAMATION DECLARING THE MONTH OF OCTOBER 1989 ~ AS RECYCLING MONTH IN ROANOKE COUNTY Y1R.g Governor of Virginia, WHEREAS, Gerald L. Baliles, Month to the month of October 1989 as Virginia Recyefforts of its recognize the importance of the recycling citizens, and and land, WHEREAS, recycling saves natural resurces, energy reduces littering by minimizing the amount of material improperly discarded, and WHEREAS, The Commonwealth is committed to a go1991, fifteen recycling ten percent of the solid waste st1995,band percent by 1993 and twenty-five percent by in the WHEREAS, Roanoke County was the first locality Commonwealth of Virginia to institute a Curbside Source Separation Recycling Program, and WHEREAS, the County's efforts have been extremely successful resulting in increased volunteer participation in community recycling programs; and has already reduced the waste stream in WHEREAS, recycling the Roanoke Valley by seven percent. THEREFORE BE IT PROCLAIMED by the Board of Supervisors of anoke County, Virginia that October ING9MONTHesignated as Ro ROANOKE COUNTY RECYCL FURTHER, the Board of Supervisorindust~ieskand residents to Viriginia encourages all businesand~in procuring recycled become more active in recylcing `' products and materials. ~! ~~. .. ',',, a ~' ~ ~~ 7 ~. ~ ti..~o"`" ~. ~~-~ ~ ~ v1-~- ~ ~ ~. ~~ ~ ~ ~ "s/ J ~"'Y'. 'y~'P~ tic ~~ ~. ~ , ~.~.%'~ ~~ r' i c r t r<~~~ ~ ~ :: ~` ~ . cgs Z~~- ~~. f. ~ 1-1fi ~, ~i , September 25, 1989 Mr. Elmer HodgeAdministrator Roanoke County p, 0. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 ~. r' ~~ Dear Mr. Hodge, Clean Valley Council has just received a copy of Governor declaring October Baliles CertificaonthfforethenCommonwealthaofyVirginia. We felt to be Recycling 1`'1 rised of this and perhaps might that you might want to be app wish to make a similar proclamation on a local basis. is the growing importance that recycling Publicizing ement will help develop citizen playing in solid waste manag The adoption of HB involvement in area recycling opportunities. 1743 which established minimum recycling goals for all Virginia cling localities will stimulate the growth of additional recy seeing movement in efforts throughout the area. We are already recycling, this direction -- Vinton's commitment to mandatory~s move to Roanoke's Task Force on recycling, Roanoke County recycling in its curbside areas and include used oil and battery offs and/or buy-back centers by the establishment of drop- private groups in Botetourt and Salem. Clean Valley Council will have its usual educate°ial lace for recycling month and we have a sP efforts in P lanned with Kroger (which hopefully informational campaig~heP strike). We will also be doing a won't be delayed by Recycling Station. special promotion with the Community Please let Recycling Month assistance. enclosure us know if you wish to declare October in Roanoke County and if we can be to be of anY Sincerely, l_~~ ~a~ _ Kelly McDaniel Whitney Recycling Coordinator .O. Box 3320, Roanoke Valley, Virginia 24015-1320 Phone (703) 345-5523 P CleanValley Council CERTIFIC~11'E of RECOGNITION r 1 ~ i r~ i ~- +_i. li~~ ,~~"r"alt:: ~~i tr~r ttliL~lU1 i~l' L'C~~rC~ ~,'~' ~, . T ~ ~.,': , ,7~'rIY)v~" '~:'t~~iy: ,..1 ' VIRGINIA RECYCLING MONTH saves natural resources, energy and land, cling the amount of material improperly WHEREAS, recy reduces littering by minimizing discarded; and onent of an WHEREAS, recycling is an essential comp ement program: and. integrated waste manag oal of the Comm°nw~hetsolidcw~tetstreamabY 1991. fifteen WHEREAS' 1995; and recycling ten percent of five percent by percent by 1993, and twenty- local inia, EAS, all agencies of the Commonwealth of eargo become WHER cled products and overnments. and businessandain procuringsrecy ur g cling more active in recy materials; NOW, THEREFORE, I`, Gerald recognize the mthehbegiOningeo, MOB, marking recycling effort, and call its all of our citizens. L, Baliles, Governor, do hereby as VIRGINIA RECYCLING 1989, annual f the Commonwealth's significance to the attention of ~j,,.,,~ c.~3a~G,._ ~.uri5~trttttur~