Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout12/19/1989 - RegularEP AN,~.~ Au-aM~~ cm Z 9 ~ 1 / ~ ' .,~ ~ ~e0sa , sES0U1CENTENN~'~ /, • A •8 • A 4 B~arti~ul Btginning // // ROANORE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ACTION AGENDA DECEMBER 19, 1989 Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meeting. Regular meetings are held on the second Tuesday and the fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public hearings are held at 7:00 p.m on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. BECAUSE OF THE CHRISTMAS HOLIDAYS, THE DECEMBER 19, 1989 MEETING WILL BE THE ONLY MEETING HELD IN DECEMBER. PUBLIC HEARINGS WILL BE HELD THIS EVENING AT 7:OO P.M. THE ORGANIZATIONAL MEETING FOR THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS HAS BEEN SET FOR JANUARY 3, 1990, AT 9:00 A.M. IN THE COMMUNITY ROOM. A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.) 1. Roll Call. 3:15 p.m. ALL PRESENT 2. Invocation: John Chambliss Assistant County Administrator 3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag. B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS ECH ADDED C.4 RESOLIITION AND REPORT ON SHENANDOAH HOMES FIRE. D.9 APPROVAL OF PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT WITH INGERSOLL RAND C. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLIITIONS, RECOGNITIONS, AND AWARDS 1. Recognition of County Officials for activities in State and National Organizations. RR INTRODUCED. ALFRED C. ANDERSON, STEVEN A. MCGRAW, ELMER C. HODGE, AND ELIZABETH LEAH WERE PRESENT. HCN/BLJ TO RECOGNIZE UW a. Alfred C. Anderson - President of the National Association of County Treasurers and Finance Officers and National Association of Counties Taxation and Finance Steering Committee. b. Steven A. McGraw - President Elect of the Virginia Association of Counties. c. Elizabeth Stokes - National Association of Counties Justice & Public Safety Steering Committee . d. Elmer C. Hodge - National Association of Counties Intergovernmental Relations Steering Committee . e. Elizabeth Leah - President of the Virginia Registrar's Association. f. Ken Hogan - President of the Virginia Animal Control Association. 2. Recognition of the Cave Spring Jaycees for being named the top chapter in the State. R-121989-1 HCN/SAM IIRC 3. Resolution of Appreciation to Lee Garrett, for service as a member of the Board of Supervisors. R-121989-2 SAM/HCN IIRC 4. Resolution and Report on Shenandoah Homes Fire. R-121989-3 BLJ/LG IIRC WILL BRING BACK REPORT IN THIRTY DAYS FROM COMMITTEE D. NEW BIISINESS 1. Presentation of Audit Report for year ended June 30, 1989 and final appropriation. 2 A-121989-4 HCN/SAM URC 2. Request for authorization to execute a contract to establish an Automated Library System with the Cities of Roanoke and Salem. A-121989-5 SAM/LG AMENDED BY HCN - BALANCE. URC 3. A-121989-6 BLJ/HCN AYES: BLJ, RR, ABSTAIN: SAM 4. A-121989-7 HCN/BLJ URC $60,000 FROM LIBRARY BUDGET, BALANCE FROM FUND Authorization to proceed with eminent domain for a sanitary sewer easement. LG, HCN Approval of Public Private Partnership Agreement with Hansteck Inc. Request to proceed with the Bonsack Fire Station. 5. A-121989-8 BLJ/HCN IIRC 1990 Legislative Program. 6. A-121989-9 BLJ/SAM TO REMOVE TWO SCHOOL REQUESTS (1) 1/2 CENT LOCAL OPTION SALES TAX FOR EDUCATION AND (2) OPPOSE COMPIILSORY BINDING ARBITRATION FOR SCHOOL EMPLOYEES - URC HCN/SAM TO APPROVE AS AMENDED - URC 7. Approval for an additional Drainage Engineer. A-121989-10 HCN/SAM TO APPROVE ADDITIONAL DRAINAGE ENGINEER URC 8. Authorization to acquire right of way for road improvements to Bushdale Road. A-121989-i1 HCN/SAM TO APPROVE THE ACQUISITION OF RIGHT-OF-WAY NECESSARY FOR THE UPGRADE OF BUSHDALE ROAD TO SECONDARY ROAD STANDARDS IIRC 3 9. Approval of Public Private Partnership Agreement with Ingersoll Rand. A-121989-12 BLJ/LG TO APPROVE STAFF RECOMMENDATION AYES: BLJ, RR, LG ABSTAIN: SAM, HCN E. REQIIESTS FOR WORK SE38ION8 NONE F. REQIIESTS FOR PIIBLIC HEARINGS NONE G. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCE 1. Ordinance authorizing the acquisition of the Bridlewood Water System, the Falling Creek Water System and the Cherry Hill Water System from the proceeds of the 1988 General Obligation Bonds. HCN/RR TO APPROVE FIRST READING - IIRC SECOND READING - 1/9/90 H. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCE 1. Ordinance repealing Ordinance 83-174 and adopting a new ordinance requiring the filing of a disclosure statement of economic interests and other specified information pursuant to Section 2.1-639.14 of the Code of Virginia. 0-121989-13 HCN/BLJ IIRC 2. Ordinance rescinding Ordinance No. 102489-5 and accepting an offer for and authorizing the sale of 5 acres, more or less, in the Glenvar West Portion of Roanoke County (Shamrock Field). 0-121989-14 BLJ/LG TO REMOVE ~4 ON STAFF RECOMMENDATION FOR SEPARATE VOTE - URC 4 BLJ/RR TO APPROVE STAFF RECOMMENDATION WITHOUT ~4 AYEB: BLJ, RR, LG ABSTAIN: SAM, HCN SAM/BLJ TO APPROVE STAFF RECOMMENDATION #~ - URC I. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING FOR REZONING ORDINANCE - CONSENT AGENDA BLJ/LG TO APPROVE FIRST READING SECOND READING AND PUBLIC HEARINGS - 1/23/90 URC 1. Petition of Roanoke County Board of Supervisors to amend the Future Land Use Plan designation of approximately 105 acres from Development to Principal Industrial and to rezone said property from R-E to M-1 for industrial development, located between Routes 11/460 and Carson Road, Hollins Magisterial District. 2. Petition of Fralin & Waldron, Inc. to amend proffered conditions on approximately 3.9 acres to construct an office park in accordance with a concept plan dated March 28, 1988, located at the north side of Route 419 at the intersection of Chaparral Drive, Cave Spring Magisterial District. 3. Petition of Aerospace Research Corporation to rezone approximately 29 acres from M-2 to develop a subdivision, located off of Route 939 (Aerospace Road), Vinton Magisterial District. 4. Petition of Brambleton Storage Corporation to amend the proffered conditions on a 1.01 acre tract in accordance with a concept plan dated November 10, 1989, and to conditionally rezone a 1.016 acre tract from B-2 to M-1 to construct mini-warehouses, located generally behind 3707 and 3655 Brambleton Avenue, Windsor Hills Magisterial District. 5. Petition of Professional Services Industries Inc. to conditionally rezone a .68 acre tract from B-2 to M-1 to permit storage and fabrication of metal products, located at 4920 Cove Road, Catwaba Magisterial District. 5 J. REPORTS AND INQIIIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS BLJ ANNOUNCED THAT BARRY ROAD SCHOOL HAD BEEN RENAMED W. E. CUNDIFF SCHOOL. SAM REPORTED GRAYSON COMMISSION WILL MEET ONE MORE TIME. LG CONGRATOLATED SALEM SCHOOLS ON IMPLEMENTING NEW BACCALAIIREATE PROGRAM. R. APPOINTMENTS NONE 1. Community Corrections Resources Board 2. Health Department Board of Directors 3. Landfill Citizens Advisory Committee 4. Library Board 5. Mental Health Services of the Roanoke Valley, Community Services Board 6. Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission 7. Regional Partnership Site Advisory Committee 8. Roanoke County Resource Authority 9. Transportation and Safety Commission. 10. Court Service Unit Advisory Council/Youth and Family Services Advisory Board L. CONSENT AGENDA R-121989-15 SAM/LG TO REMOVE L-2 FOR SEPARATE VOTE - IIRC HCN/SAM TO APPROVE WITHOIIT ITEM L-2 - IIRC ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLIITION IN THE BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA A] SEPARATELY. CONSENT AGENDA ARE ROIITINE AND WILL BE FORM OR FORMS LISTED THAT ITEM WILL BE ;JD WILL BE CONSIDERED 6 1. Approval of Minutes - May 9, 1989. 2. Request for approval of Raffle Permit - Loyal Order of Moose Lodge No. 284. A-121989-i5.a REMOVED FROM CONSENT AGENDA BLJ/HCN AYEB: BLJ, RR, HCN, LG ABSTAIN: SAM 3. Confirmation of Committee appointment - Industrial Development Authority. A-121989-15.b 4. Acceptance of Water and Sanitary Sewer facilities serving, Williamsburg Court and Nichols Estates, Section #4. A-121989-15.c 5. Request for acceptance of Legate Drive and Deputy Drive into the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System A-121989-i5.d 6. Donation of storm drainage and sanitary sewer easement from Fralin & Waldron Inc., J. Henry Powers, Calvin W. Powers and P&W Partnership. A-121989-i5.e 7. Donation of a water line easement from Insulation Systems Inc. of Virginia. A-121989-15.f 8. Donation of a drainage easement from James S. Payne. A-121989-15.Q 9. Donation of a drainage easement from Barry J. St. John and Diane St. John. A-121989-15.h 7 M. CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMIINICATIONS 1. Ron Hudnell or Wes Johnson, Bridlewood Homeowners Association, to speak on their water system. PRESENTED RESOLIITION FROM HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION. ASKED THAT SIIRPLIIS BE IISED TO PIIRCHASE WATER SYSTEM. N. REPORTS HCN/BLJ TO RECEIVE AND FILE UW 1. Valley Metro Routes in Roanoke County. 2. Economic Development Road construction. BLJ REQIIESTED COIINTY ADMINISTRATOR TO INCORPORATE DIITIES OF ROAD ENGINEER INTO NEW JOB DESCRIPTION FOR DRAINAGE ENGINEER. 3. Accounts Paid - October, 1989 4. Accounts Paid - November, 1989. 5. Income and Expenses for the four months ending October 31, 1989. 6. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance. 7. General Fund Unappropriated Balance. 8. Board Contingency Fund. 9. Citizen Survey on Services. SAM ASKED FOR DISCIISSION ON THIS ISSIIE AT FIITIIRE MEETING. O. EXECUTIVE SESSION pursuant to the Code of Virginia Section 2.1-344 A (1) Personnel Evaluation of staff. LG/SAM - IIRC - AT 5:15 P.M. p. CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE SESSION R-121989-16 8 LG/RR - 5:40 P.M. EVENING SESSION (7:00 P.M.) BEGAN AT 7.10 P.M. Q. PIIBLIC HEARING ON CHARTER 1289-1 Public Hearing so that the citizens of the County of Roanoke shall have an opportunity to comment upon the City of Roanoke and the County of Roanoke's request that the 1990 General Assembly grant the Roanoke Metropolitan Government a charter as follows: Incorporation; Powers; Governing Body; Metropolitan Manager; Constitutional Officers; Personnel Rules and Regulations; Administration; Department of Law; Department of Finance; Other Appointed Officers; Planning and Zoning; Department of Public Health; Department of Social Services; Department of Education; Financial Administration; Budget; Borrowing; Intergovernmental Relationships; Power of Eminent Domain; Ordinances; and Miscellaneous SAM/HCN TO APPROVE THE CHARTER AMENDED THAT CEO, ATTORNEY, AND INTERNAL AODITOR BE APPOINTED BY THE BOARD WITH OTHER OFFICIALS APPOINTED BY THE CEO. AYES: SAM, HCN NAYS: BLJ, RR, LG SAM/HCN TO INCORPORATE LANGIIAGE THAT RMG WILL BE PROHIBITED FROM ANNEBING TERRITORY IN SURROIINDING COIINTIES AYES: SAM, HCN NAYS: BLJ, RR, LG 0-121989-17 RR/SAM TO APPROVE CHARTER INCORPORATING CHANGES AND CORRECTIONS AS PRESENTED BY PMM QRC R. PIIBLIC HEARINGS AND SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES PLEASE NOTE: PIIBLIC HEARINGS 1289-2, 1289-3, 1289-4 AND 1289-5 WILL NOT BE HEARD THIS EVENING. 1289-2 An ordinance to change the zoning classification of approximately 35 acres of real estate generally located south of I-81 and west of Plantation Road in the Hollins Magisterial District from R-1 to M- 1 for mixed-use development with conditions upon 9 the application Roanoke County, PETITIONER) WITHDRAWN BY PETITIONER of the Board of Supervisors of Virginia. (WITHDRAWN BY 1289-3 An ordinance to amend the Future Land Use Map designation of a 24.09 acre tract generally located south of Buck Mountain Road and east of the Blue Ridge Parkway, in the Cave Spring Magisterial District, from Rural Village to Principal Industrial, and to rezone said property from M-2 to M-3, with conditions upon the request of the Virginia Asphalt Paving Company. (DEFERRED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION ON DECEMBER 5, 1989.) CONTINUED TO 1/23/90 1289-4 An ordinance to rezone approximately 4.47 acres from R-3 to B-1 to construct an office park, located at the southwest corner of Cresthill Drive and Garst Mill Road, in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District, upon the request of Nolan Jackson.(DEFERRED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION ON DECEMBER 5, 1989.) CONTINUED TO 1/23/90 1289-5 An ordinance to amend the Future Land Use Plan map designation of approximately 54 acres located west of Hollins Road and south of Lois Lane in the Hollins Magisterial District from Development to Principal Industrial and to change the zoning classification from R-1 to M-1 for industrial development purposes with conditions upon the application of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia (CONTINUED FOR SIXTY DAYS AT REQUEST OF PETITIONER.) CONTINUED TO 2/27/90 1289-6 An ordinance to rezone approximately 3.13 acres from R-1 to R-E with conditions, located at 6044 Cove Road, in the Catawba Magisterial District, upon the request of James and Charlotte Moore. 0-121989-18 SAM/RR URC 1289-7 Ordinance amending Chapter 8, "Erosion and 10 Sediment Control", of the Roanoke County Code by amending Section 8-11 (a), "Control Measures Generally" to provide for the adoption of stormwater management criteria; and Resolution adopting a new section of the Design and Construction Standards Manual entitled "Stormwater Management Criteria."(CONTINUED FROM OCTOBER 24, 1989 AND NOVEMBER 28, 1989) BLJ/SAM TO CONTINIIE FOR THIRTY DAYS (1/23/90) TO WORK KITH HOME DEVELOPERS URC HCN REQUESTED TO INCLUDE BOND TO COVER COST OF DETENTION POND BLJ REQUESTED CASE STUDY OF VARIOIIS SIZE DEVELOPMENTS AND IMPACT OF VARIOIIS SIZE DETENTION. 1289-8 An ordinance to change the zoning classification of approximately 11.8 acres of real estate located at the end of Benois Road in the Cave Spring Magisterial District from R-1 to M-1 for industrial development with conditions upon the application of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. (CONTINUED FROM NOVEMBER 28, 1989) 0-121989-19 RR/SAM IIRC 1289-9 An ordinance to change the zoning classification of approximately 125 acres of real estate located south of Routes 11 and 460, south and west of Barley Drive and the N&W railway in the Catawba Magisterial District from A-1MH to M-1 for industrial development with conditions upon the application of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. (CONTINUED FROM NOVEMBER 28, 1989) 0-121989-20 SAM/RR IIRC 1289-10 An ordinance to rezone approximately 19 acres from A-1 to M-1 said acreage comprised of a 6.6 acre tract located south of the terminus of Friendship Lane, and an 11.3 acre tract adjacent to the northeast boundary of ITT and approximately 75 feet northeast from the end of Lila Drive 11 located in the Hollins Magisterial District, upon the request of the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors, Virginia. 0-121989-21 HCN/SAM WITH PROFFER ~4 DELETED AYES: RR, SAM, HCN, LG ABSTAIN: ~a B~-? 8. CITIZENS COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS NONE HCN/SAM MOVED THAT NOTWITHSTANDING PROPOSED LEGIBLATION WHICH MAY BE ADOPTED BY THE 1990 SESSION OF THE VIRGINIA GENERAL ASSEMBLY PURSUANT TO THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE COMMISSION ON LOCAL GOVERNMENT STRUCTURES AND RELATIONSHIPS, ANY FURTHER NEGOTIATIONS BETWEEN ROANORE COUNTY AND THE TOWN OF VINTON CONCERNING A BOUNDARY LINE RELOCATION OR CHANGE BY AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE LOCALITIES SHALL NOT BE PRECLUDED OR OTHERWISE LIMITED. IIRC T. ADJOURNMENT BLJ/RR - UVV - 9:10 P.M. 12 ' ~ POAN ,f.~ ~~ o ~ ALL-AMERICA CITY ~ ~ " 'r ' • , z ~~ ~~~t~~~~e ~~~~~ ~ , 18 ~ sa q.9 .g .9 gFS0U1CENTENN~P A Beauri~ul8cginning ROANORE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA DECEMBER 19, 1989 Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meeting. Regular meetings are held on the second Tuesday and the fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public hearings are held at 7:00 p.m on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. BECAUSE OF THE CHRISTMAS HOLIDAYS, THE DECEMBER 19, 1989 MEETING WILL BE THE ONLY MEETING HELD IN DECEMBER. PUBLIC HEARINGS WILL. BE HELD THIS EVENING AT 7:00 P.M. THE ORGANIZATIONAL MEETINGTF9ROTOHEA•BOAIN THESCOMMUNITYSROOM.BEEN SET FOR JANUARY 3, 1990, A A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.) 1. Roll Call. 2. Invocation: John Chambliss Assistant County Administrator 3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag. B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS C. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS, AND AWARDS 1. Recognition of County Officials for activities in State and National Organizations. a. Alfred C. Anderson - President of the National Association of County Treasurers and Finance Officers and National Association of Counties Taxation and Finance Steering Committee. b. Steven A. McGraw - President Elect of the Virginia Association of Counties. c. Elizabeth Stokes - National Association of Counties Justice & Public Safety Steering Committee. d. Elmer C. Hodge - National Association of Counties Intergovernmental Relations Steering Committee. e. Elizabeth Leah - President of the Virginia Registrar's Association. f. Ken Hogan - President of the Virginia Animal Control Association. 2. Recognition of the Cave Spring Jaycees for being named the top chapter in the State. 3. Resolution of Appreciation to Lee Garrett, for service as a member of the Board of Supervisors. D. NEW BUSINESS 1. Presentation of Audit Report for year ended June 30, 1989 and final appropriation. 2. Request for authorization to execute a contract to establish an Automated Library System with the Cities of Roanoke and Salem. 3. Authorization to proceed with eminent domain for a sanitary sewer easement. 4. Approval of Public Private Partnership Agreement with Hansteck Inc. 5. Request to proceed with the Bonsack Fire Station. 6. 1990 Legislative Program. 7. Approval for an additional Drainage Engineer. 8. Authorization to acquire right of way for road improvements to Bushdale Road. 2 E. REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS F. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS G. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCE 1. Ordinance authorizing the acquisition of the Bridlewood Water System, the Falling Creek Water System and the Cherry Hill Water System from the proceeds of the 1988 General Obligation Bonds. H. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCE 1. Ordinance repealing Ordinance 83-174 and adopting a new ordinance requiring the filing of a disclosure statement of economic interests and other specified information pursuant to Section 2.1-639.14 of the Code of Virginia. 2. Ordinance rescinding Ordinance No. 102489-5 and accepting an offer for and authorizing the sale of 5 acres, more or less, in the Glenvar West Portion of Roanoke County (Shamrock Field). I. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING FOR REZONING ORDINANCE - CONSENT AGENDA 1. Petition of Roanoke County Board of Supervisors to amend the Future Land Use Plan designation of approximately 105 acres from Development to Principal Industrial and to rezone said property from R-E to M-1 for industrial development, located between Routes 11/460 and Carson Road, Hollins Magisterial District. 2. Petition of Fralin & Waldron, Inc. to amend proffered conditions on approximately 3.9 acres to construct an office park in accordance with a concept plan dated March 28, 1988, located at the north side of Route 419 at the intersection of Chaparral Drive, Cave Spring Magisterial District. 3 3. Petition of Aerospace Research Corporation to rezone approximately 29 acres from M-2 to develop a subdivision, located off of Route 939 (Aerospace Road), Vinton Magisterial District. 4. Petition of Brambleton Storage Corporation to amend the proffered conditions on a 1.01 acre tract in accordance with a concept plan dated November 10, 1989, and to conditionally rezone a 1.016 acre tract from B-2 to M-1 to construct mini-warehouses, located generally behind 3707 and 3655 Brambleton Avenue, Windsor Hills Magisterial District. 5. Petition of Professional Services Industries Inc. to conditionally rezone a .68 acre tract from B-2 to M-1 to permit storage and fabrication of metal products, located at 4920 Cove Road, Catwaba Magisterial District. J. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS g. APPOINTMENTS 1. Community Corrections Resources Board 2. Health Department Board of Directors 3, Landfill Citizens Advisory Committee 4. Library Board 5. Mental Health Services of the Roanoke Valley, Community Services Board 6. Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission 7. Regional Partnership Site Advisory Committee 8. Roanoke County Resource Authority 9. Transportation and Safety Commission. 10. Court Service Unit Advisory Council/Youth and Family Services Advisory Board L. CONSENT AGENDA 4 ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA Al SEPARATELY. CONSENT AGENDA ARE ROUTINE AND WILL BE FORM OR FORMS LISTED THAT ITEM WILL BE KD WILL BE CONSIDERED 1. Approval of Minutes - May 9, 1989. 2. Request for approval of Raffle Permit - Loyal Order of Moose Lodge No. 284. 3. Confirmation of Committee appointment - Industrial Development Authority. 4. Acceptance of Water and Sanitary Sewer facilities serving, Williamsburg Court and Nichols Estates, Section #4. 5 Request for acceptance of Legate Drive and Deputy Drive into the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System 6. Donation of storm drainage and sanitary sewer easement from Fralin & Waldron Inc., J. Henry Powers, Calvin W. Powers and P&W Partnership. 7. Donation of a water line easement from Insulation Systems Inc. of Virginia. 8. Donation of a drainage easement from James S. Payne. 9. Donation of a drainage easement from Barry J. St. John and Diane St. John. M. CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS 1. Ron Hudnell or Wes Johnson, Bridlewood Homeowners Association, to speak on their water system. N. REPORTS 1. Valley Metro Routes in Roanoke County. 2. Economic Development Road construction. 3. Accounts Paid - October, 1989 4. Accounts Paid - November, 1989. 5 5. Income and Expenses for the four months ending October 31, 1989. 6. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance. 7. General Fund Unappropriated Balance. g, Board Contingency Fund. g. Citizen Survey on Services. O. EXECUTIVE SESSION pursuant to the Code of Virginia Section 2.1-344 A p. CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE SESSION EVENING SESSION (7:00 P.M.) Q. PUBLIC HEARING ON CHARTER 1289-1 Public Hearing so that the citizens of the County of Roanoke shall have an opportunity to comment upon the City of Roanoke and the County of Roanoke's request that the 1990 General Assembly grant the Roanoke Metropolitan Government a charter as follows: Incorporation; Powers; Governing Body; Metropolitan Manager; Constitutional Officers; Personnel Rules and Regulations; Administration; Department of Law; Department of Finance; Other Appointed Officers; Planning and Zoning; Department of Public Health; Department of Social Services; Department of Education; Financial Administration; Budget; Borrowing; Intergovernmental Relationships; Power of Eminent Domain; Ordinances; and Miscellaneous R. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES PLEASE NOTE: PUBLIC HEARINGS 1289-2, 1289-3, 1289-4 AND 1289-5 WILL NOT BE HEARD THIS EVENING. 1289-2 An ordinance to change the zoning classification of approximately 35 acres of real estate generally located south of I-81 and west of Plantation Road in the Hollins Magisterial District from R-1 to M- 6 1 for mixed-use development with conditions upon the application of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. (WITHDRAWN BY PETITIONER) 1289-3 An ordinance to amend the Future Land Use Map designation of a 24.09 acre tract generally located south of Buck Mountain Road and east of the Blue Ridge Parkway, in the Cave Spring Magisterial District, from Rural Village to Principal Industrial, and to rezone said property from M-2 to M-3, with conditions upon the request of the Virginia Asphalt Paving Company. (DEFERRED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION ON DECEMBER 5, 1989.) 1289-4 An ordinance to rezone approximately 4.47 acres from R-3 to B-1 to construct an office park, located at the southwest corner of Cresthill Drive and Garst Mill Road, in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District, upon the request of Nolan Jackson.(DEFERRED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION ON DECEMBER 5, 1989.) 1289-5 An ordinance to amend the Future Land Use Plan map designation of approximately 54 acres located west of Hollins Road and south of Lois Lane in the Hollins Magisterial District from Development to Principal Industrial and to change the zoning classification from R-1 to M-1 for industrial development purposes with conditions upon the application of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia (CONTINUED FOR SIXTY DAYS AT REQUEST OF PETITIONER.) 1289-6 An ordinance to rezone approximately 3.13 acres from R-1 to R-E with conditions, located at 6044 Cove Road, in the Catawba Magisterial District, upon the request of James and Charlotte Moore. 12gg-7 Ordinance amending Chapter 8, "Erosion and Sediment Control", of the Roanoke County Code by amending Section 8-11 (a), "Control Measures Generally" to provide for the adoption of stormwater management criteria; and Resolution adopting a new section of the Design and Construction Standards Manual entitled "Stormwater Management Criteria."(CONTINUED FROM OCTOBER 24, 1989 AND NOVEMBER 28, 1989) 1289-8 An ordinance to change the zoning classification of approximately 11.8 acres of real estate located at the end of Benois Road in the Cave Spring 7 Magisterial District from R-1 to M-1 for industrial development with conditions upon the application of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. (CONTINUED FROM NOVEMBER 28, 1989) 1289-9 An ordinance to change the zoning classification of approximately 125 acres of real estate located south of Routes 11 and 460, south and west of Barley Drive and the N&W railway in the Catawba Magisterial District from A-1MH to M-1 for industrial development with conditions upon the application of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. (CONTINUED FROM NOVEMBER 28, 1989) 1289-10 An ordinance to rezone approximately 19 acres from A-1 to M-1 said acreage comprised of a 6.6 acre tract located south of the terminus of Friendship Lane, and an 11.3 acre tract adjacent to the northeast boundary of ITT and approximately 75 feet northeast from the end of Lila Drive located in the Hollins Magisterial District, upon the request of the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors, Virginia. S. CITIZEN3~ COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS T. ADJOURNMENT 8 4 ... r AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, DECEMBER 19, 1989 RESOLUTION 121989-1 OF APPRECIATION TO THE CAVE SPRING JAYCEES FOR BEING NAMED THE TOP CHAPTER IN THE STATE WHEREAS, the Cave Spring Jaycees has been an active volunteer group, providing many hours and funds to help meet the needs of the Roanoke Valley in general, and Roanoke County in particular; and WHEREAS, the Cave spring Jaycees has been involved in collecting over $60,000 worth of supplies for victims of Hurricane Hugo, in sponsoring candidates' debates prior to the November election, and assisting the County with its All America City celebration; and WHEREAS, during the upcoming Christmas season, the Jaycees will provide Christmas presents for the Mental Health Services Children's Center, for underprivileged children, and for senior citizens at Southern Manor, as well as a Christmas party for residents of the Burwell Home; and WHEREAS, the Cave spring Jaycees has initiated innovative methods to raise funds for year-round activities, including their current gift-wrapping store at Tanglewood Mall; and WHEREAS, the year-round activities of the Club include sponsoring campers at Camp Virginia Jaycees, and providing funds to the Muscular Dystrophy Association, St. Jude's Children's Hospital and the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation; and WHEREAS, the state organization, Virginia Jaycees, reviewed the past activities and future plans of the Cave Spring Jaycees, and awarded them the honor of being the top Jaycee organization in the State. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors, on behalf of itself and all residents of the Valley, does hereby extend its gratitude and appreciation to the Cave Spring Jaycees for all that the members give to this community; and FURTHER, the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors does hereby extend its congratulations to the Cave Spring Jaycees for being named the top Chapter in the State. On motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by Supervisor McGraw, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisor Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: ° `~ - Clerk Brenda J. H ton, Deputy Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Resolutions of Appreciation File AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, DECEMBER 19, 1989 RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION TO THE CAVE SPRING JAYCEES FOR BEING NAMED THE TOP CHAPTER IN THE STATE WHEREAS, the Cave Spring Jaycees has been an active volunteer group, providing many hours and funds to help meet the needs of the Roanoke Valley in general, and Roanoke County in particular; and WHEREAS, the Cave spring Jaycees has been involved in collecting over $60,000 worth of supplies for victims of Hurricane Hugo, in sponsoring candidates' debates prior to the November election, and assisting the County with its All America City celebration; and WHEREAS, during the upcoming Christmas season, the Jaycees will provide Christmas presents for the Mental Health Services Children's Center, for underprivileged children, and for senior citizens at Southern Manor, as well as a Christmas party for residents of the Burwell Home; and WHEREAS, the Cave spring Jaycees has initiated innovative methods to raise funds for year-round activities, including their current gift-wrapping store at Tanglewood Mall; and WHEREAS, the year-round activities of the Club include sponsoring campers at Camp Virginia Jaycees, and providing funds to the Muscular Dystrophy Association, St. Jude's Children's Hospital and the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation; and WHEREAS, the state organization, Virginia Jaycees, ..... reviewed the past activities and future plans of the Cave Spring Jaycees, and awarded them the honor of being the top Jaycee organization in the State. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors, on behalf of itself and all residents of the Valley, does hereby extend its gratitude and appreciation to the Cave Spring Jaycees for all that the members give to this community; and FURTHER, the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors does hereby extend its congratulations to the Cave Spring Jaycees for being named the top Chapter in the State. ~.•~+ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF-THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, DECEMBER 19, 1989 RESOLUTION 121989-2 OF APPRECIATION TO LEE GARRETT FOR SERVICE AS A MEMBER OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS WHEREAS, Lee Garrett was elected to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors from the Windsor Hills Magisterial District in 1985; and WHEREAS, Mr. Garrett served with distinction on the Board of Supervisors, helping to guide the County through a time of growth and change; and WHEREAS, Mr. Garrett was instrumental in the formation of the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission, and served as the Vice Chairman of that Commission, giving Roanoke County a part in the operation of the Regional Airport; and WHEREAS, Mr. Garrett served as a member of the negotiating team during consolidation discussions with the City of Roanoke; and WHEREAS, Mr. Garrett served two terms as Chairman of the Board, during which time the County received statewide and national recognition for various innovative programs; and WHEREAS, Mr. Garrett was an essential member of the County's All America City Award Team, leading the presentation and helping the county to become the first in Virginia to receive that award. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors, on behalf of itself and all citizens of Roanoke County, do hereby extend their gratitude and appreciation to LEE GARRETT for his outstanding contributions to the County as a member of the Board of Supervisors; and FURTHERMORE, the Board extends its deepest hopes that Mr. Garrett continues his involvement with and concern for the citizens of Roanoke County. On motion of Supervisor McGraw, seconded by Supervisor Nickens, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisor Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Brenda J. H ton, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Resolutions of Appreciation File D. Keith Cook, Director, Human Resources C~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, DECEMBER 19, 1989 RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION TO LEE GARRETT FOR SERVICE AS A MEMBER OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS WHEREAS, Lee Garrett was elected to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors from the Windsor Hills Magisterial District in 1985; and WHEREAS, Mr. Garrett served with distinction on the Board of Supervisors, helping to guide the County through a time of growth and change; and WHEREAS, Mr. Garrett was instrumental in the formation of the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission, and served as the Vice Chairman of that Commission, giving Roanoke County a part in the operation of the Regional Airport; and WHEREAS, Mr. Garrett served as a member of the negotiating team during consolidation discussions with the City of Roanoke; and WHEREAS, Mr. Garrett served two terms as Chairman of the Board, during which time the County received statewide and national recognition for various innovative programs; and WHEREAS, Mr. Garrett was an essential member of the County's All America City Award Team, leading the presentation and helping the county to become the first in Virginia to receive that award. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors, on behalf of itself and all citizens of Roanoke County, do hereby extend their gratitude and appreciation ~~~ a~ to LEE GARRETT for his outstanding contributions to the County as a member of the Board of Supervisors; and FURTHERMORE, the Board extends its deepest hopes that Mr. Garrett continues his involvement with and concern for the citizens of Roanoke County. ._ C-`I AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, DECEMBER 19, 1989 RESOLUTION 121989-3 OF APPRECIATION TO THE INDIVIDUALS AND ORGANIZATIONS WHO ASSISTED AT THE SHENANDOAH HOMES FIRE WHEREAS, on Thursday, December 14, 1989, a fire at the Shenandoah Homes retirement complex resulted in the tragic loss of four lives and personal injury to both residents and those fighting the fire; and WHEREAS, many individuals and organizations set aside their personal safety and comfort during the middle of a snowy, sub-freezing night to assist those residents during this devastating situation; and WHEREAS, members of the Roanoke County Sheriff's Office began the evacuation of the residents; and WHEREAS, six fire companies and eight rescue squads responded to the fire, performing in a heroic manner at all times; and WHEREAS, in the true spirit of regional cooperation, neighboring localities offered their assistance by manning the stations who responded to the fire and Roanoke City rescue squads joined in the evacuation process; and WHEREAS, the staff and residents of Shenandoah Homes facilitated the efforts of the fire and rescue personnel using their knowledge and skills learned in previous fire drills; and WHEREAS, the Roanoke County School System provided school buses to transport the residents of the retirement home to an emergency evacuation center; and WHEREAS, Peggy and Raymond Setchel offered the use of the Star City Roller Skating Center as an emergency evacuation shelter. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, wishes to express its pride and admiration to those individuals and organizations for their many efforts to aid the residents at the Shenandoah Homes retirement complex; and FURTHER, The Board, on behalf of the citizens of Roanoke County, expresses its deepest appreciation for the heroic deeds that were performed by so many with little thought to personal comfort and safety. On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor Garrett, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisor Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Brenda J. lton, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Resolutions of Appreciation File Chief Tommy Fuqua, Fire & Rescue Sheriff Michael Kavanaugh "! AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, DECEMBER 19, 1989 RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION TO THE INDIVIDUALS AND ORGANIZATIONS WHO ASSISTED AT THE SHENANDOAH HOMES FIRE WHEREAS, on Thursday, December 14, 1989, a fire at the Shenandoah Homes retirement complex resulted in the tragic loss of four lives and personal injury to both residents and those fighting the fire; and WHEREAS, many individuals and organizations set aside their personal safety and comfort during the middle of a snowy, sub-freezing night to assist those residents during this devastating situation; and WHEREAS, members of the Roanoke County Sheriff's Office began the evacuation of the residents; and WHEREAS, six fire companies and eight rescue squads responded to the fire, performing in a heroic manner at all times; and WHEREAS, in the true spirit of regional cooperation, neighboring localities offered their assistance by manning the stations who responded to the fire and Roanoke City rescue squads joined in the evacuation process; and WHEREAS, the staff and residents of Shenandoah Homes facilitated the efforts of the fire and rescue personnel using their knowledge and skills learned in previous fire drills; and WHEREAS, the Roanoke County School System provided school buses to transport the residents of the retirement home to an emergency evacuation center; and WHEREAS, Peggy and Raymond Setchel offered the use of the Star City Roller Skating Center as an emergency evacuation shelter. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, wishes to express its pride and admiration to those individuals and organizations for their many efforts to aid the residents at the Shenandoah Homes retirement complex; and FURTHER, The Board, on behalf of the citizens of Roanoke County, expresses its deepest appreciation for the heroic deeds that were performed by so many with little thought to personal comfort and safety. C `~ OF AOANp,Y~ z~ ~ 2 °v ' a 1 U E~ 8$ SFSQUICENTENN~P~ d Bcauti~ulBeginning COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C HODGE DATE: December 19, 1989 WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DIS= -- RICHARD W. ROBERS. VICE-CHAIRM~V CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTO _' BOB L. JOHNS~V HOLLINS MAG~STE RIAL D~S~= ~' STEVEN A. MCGR-.~ MEMORANDUM CATAW BA MAGISTERIAL DIS'= _' HARRY C. NICKE\_ VIN TON MAGISTERIAL DIS-= -' TO: Roanoke County Board of Supervisors FROM: Elmer C. Hodge ~~ County Administrator RE: Report on Fire at Shenandoah Homes BACKGROUND On December 14, a fatal fire broke out at Shenandoah Homes, an adult and nursing home facility in Roanoke County. Volunteer and paid firefighters and paramedics responded from the Hollins Fire and Rescue Department, and were assisted by Roanoke County Sheriff's Deputies and emergency personnel from other County Fire and Rescue Stations and from neighboring jurisdictions. Our emergency personnel performed admirably under adverse conditions, which included freezing weather, ground covered with snow, and an elderly population needing assistance. Four people died, but the actions of our personnel, combined with a fire drill and evacuation plan in place at Shenandoah Homes, not only saved the lives of the other residents, but also prevented any life- threatening injury. Staff from our Fire and Rescue Department has conducted a routine investigation of all aspects of the fire, including the cause, the response time, and the actions taken at the scene. Due to the fatalities, the National Fire Protection Association has investigated the incident, and a report is expected from that Association within the next few weeks. We should reserve judgment on any part of the County's response until that report is avail- able. 1 C~vun~~ of ~o~ttnn~r BOARD OF SUPERVISORS LEE GARRETT. CHAIP.N=V P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 2 4018-07 9 8 (703> 772-2004 RECOMMENDATIONS Study Committee I have appointed a Fire and Rescue Study Committee to review the incident and response times for County Fire and Rescue opera- tions. The .Committee is to study current response times, and to make recommendations for any necessary improvements and suggestions in both the short and the long term. In particular, I will ask them to focus on our larger departments, such as Cave Spring, Hollins, Ft. Lewis and Vinton. The Committee is composed as follows: Tommy Fuqua, Chairman David Hafey Frances Murphy Steve Poff Don Gillespie Fire Chief Paid Rescue Service Volunteer Rescue Service Paid Firefighters Volunteer Firefighters We also plan to include someone from the Hollins Station on this Committee . Mutual Aid Agreements I am also asking the Committee to review our mutual aid agreements with surrounding communities and recommend ways to strengthen them, if necessary. Public safety should know no boun- daries, and all emergency personnel in the Valley should be available as needed. The Committee will report back to me within thirty days, and I expect to have the recommendations for the Board by the January 23rd meeting. Incentive Policy for Adult and Nursinct Home_Facilities Staff will also draft for the Board's consideration an incentive policy aimed at encouraging nursing and adult home facilities to retrofit with sprinkler systems. The loss of life at Shenandoah Homes may well have been prevented had such a system been in place. We can encourage this activity with incentives such as waiving water connection fees, and we plan to have a report on that also available for the January 23rd meeting. The fire at Shenandoah Homes was a tragedy for everyone involved. However, no one could have performed better than the County team, and they deserve a great deal of credit for their 2 actions that morning. The response to the fire and the evacuation was efficient and professionel~ossesshowed the kind of training and dedication that those peopl p cc: Tommy Fuqua, Fire Chief David Hafey Frances Murphy Don Gillespie Steve Poff 3 ACTION # A-121989-4 ITEM NUMBER L''" AT p' VIRG NIA HELDNAT THEHROANOKE OCOUNTYEADMINISTRATION OCENTER COUNTY, MEETING DATE: December 19, 1989 AGENDA ITEM: Presentation of Roanoke County Audit for the Year Ended June 30, 1989 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND: On September 12, 1989 the County staff pres1989a preliminary results of operations for the year ended June 30, At this time, we would like to present the audited comprehensive annual financial report for the County of Roanoke for the year ended June 30, 1989. Peat Marwick Main & Co. performed the independent audit and presented the County with a unqualified opinion. SLTNIlKARY OF INFORMATION: As a result of operations for the year ended June 30, 1989, the County generated additional funds of $2,996,225. As shown on the Table on page 3, $525,000 of this amount was used in the 1989-90 budget, which leaves $2,471,225 as an increase in the unappropriated balance. The preliminary report on operations appropriated $2,026,000 to unappropriated fund balance. This final report of operations will add an additional $445,225 to unappropriated fund balance. This additional money is the result of savings over anticipated expenditures and rollovers at the time of the preliminary report. This surplus can be attributed to revenues collected in excess of the amount budgeted. The majority of these revenues were in the area of real estate taxes ($920,451 in excess of budget) and personal property taxes ($1,592,457 in excess of budget). Actual expenditures were $454,142 under the amount that was budgeted, which reflects our efforts to stay within the allocated budgets. This makes our undesignated fund balance at June 30, 1989, $4,483,543 or 7.52% of the general fund expenditures. This is an excellent increase in our fund balance position, however it is important to keep in mind that since June 30, 1989 the Board has appropriated $286,980 of this reserve which presently leaves an undesignated fund balance of $4,196,563. """ In addition, the School Operating Fund had an excess of $381,133 for the year. Based upon an earlier understanding $150,000 will be used to help offset the cost of employee health insurance coverage. The remaining $231,133 will be appropriated to the School Capital Fund. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends: 1) AheeCount tof Roanokeeforvthenyear endedcJuneR30~r1989r t Y 2) Appropriating the following amounts resulting from 1988-89 operations: County General Fund - $445,225 Unappropriated Balance School Operating Fund - 150 000 Employee Health Insurance School Capital Fund - 231,133 Unappropriated Balance 3) Adopting a goal statement to maintain the General Fund Unappropriated Balance at a minimum of 6.25% of 1989-90 General Fund expenditures, which is $3,948,000. (~ ~ y ~ ~. Diane D. Hyatt Elmer C. Hodge Director of Finance County Administrator ---------------------------- Yes No Abs Approved ( x) Motion by: Harrv c' N;~kP-n~~1- Garrett X Denied ( ) gtPVan A Mc~['raw to a~nrnvP Johnson x Received ( ) ~{-aff YP(`C]mmPtl(~At"lnY1 McGraw x Referred ( ) Nickens x To Robers x cc: File Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance Reta Busher, Director, Management & Budget Don Myers, Assistant County Administrator 2 ~- i County of Roanoke, Virginia Results of Operations (Audited) General Fund For the Year Ended June 30, 1989 Budget Revenues Real Estate Taxes Personal Property Taxes Sales Tax Meals Tax All other revenue Total revenues $ 25,780,009 10,200,000 4,390,492 1,500,000 16,384,875 58,255,376 Expenditures (including (60,224,998) rollovers) Use of Fund Balance and change 1 969,622 in Reserves _0_ Previously appropriated: Beginning balance for 1989-90 budget Actual $ 26,700,460 11,792,457 4,141,633 1,475,402 16,446,854 60,556,806 (59,770,856) 2,210,275 2,996,225 (525,000) Preliminary year end report (Sept. 12, 1989) $(2 04450225 IMPACT ON UNDESIGNATED FUND BALANCE Preliminary beginning balance at July 1, 1989 Final adjustment (per above) Audited beginning balance at July 1, 1989 Board appropriations to date: Dental insurance Drainage projects New Fund Balance at December 19, 1989 Variance $ 920,451 1,592,457 (248,859) (24,598) 61,979 2,301,430 454,142 240,653 2,996,225 $ 4,038,318 445,225 4,483,543 (106,980) (180 000) 4 196.563 3 ~- i COUNTY OF ROANORE, VIRGINIA UNDESIGNATED FUND BALANCES Undesignated Fund Balance at June 30, 1986 Undesignated Fund Balance at June 30, 1987 Undesignated Fund Balance at June 30, 1988 Undesignated Fund Balance at June 30, 1989 $ 1 584,637 $ 2 063,493 $ 3,037,141 $ 4 483,543 3.16 3.87% 5.32% 7.52% 4 .f A-121989-5 ACTION NO. ITEM NO . .... AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: December 19, 1989 AGENDA ITEM: Request for authorization to execute a contract to establish an automated library system with the Cities of Roanoke and Salem. BACKGROUND' December 13, 1988 The board authorized staff to proceed through the bidding process with the Cities of Roanoke and Salem to determine the fiscal impact and feasibility of a Valleywide Library Automation System. June 27, 1989 A work session was held to update the Board on status of the project. No action was requested at that time. Jules 25, 1989 The Board authorized the County to participate in the project. Under the approved arrangement, the City of Roanoke would execute a contract with the vendor, install the system, and front the cost of the system. The County would use $60,000 from the Library operating budge to cover the cost of converting the files, installing the terminals and paying the City a down payment for our share of the system. The balance of $300,000 roximatel re113a000 the City over the next three years at app Y $ assuming bond rates 6.25%. November 15, 1989 The Board delayed action on a request to authorize Mr. Hodge to execute the contract with the City to allow staff to study the agreement and gather further information. December 4, 1989 Roanoke City Council authorized the execution of a contract with the vendor contingent on participation by the County. ~- 2 SUMMARY OF INFORMATION Staff has negotiated a contract with the representatives of the Cities of Roanoke and Salem which is substantially in accord with the July 25, 1989, Board action. However, several of the financial terms have changed over the past three and one-half months. These changes are as follows: 1. The cost estimates initially submitted to the Board (see Attachment A) have been revised (see Appendix B of the Contract). 2. The County shall pay the City of Roanoke $68,362 during this fiscal year (see Section 16 (a) of Contract). 3. The interest rate for repayments is 8.75% (see Section 16 (a) of the Contract). 4. The County shall repay the City of Roanoke $100,000 on or before July 1, 1990; $117,500 on or before July 1, 1991; and $108,750 on or before July 1, 1992. 5. The County's share of the current contract is $4, 388 less than the estimate initially submitted to the Board. The contract and Appendices A, B and C are attached to this report. In considering this request, several key points should be noted: o Selection of hardware and software for the system was made by the Library Automation Committee consisting of representatives of Roanoke County and the Cities of Roanoke and Salem. Selection was made based on an extensive list of criteria. The winning system was the unanimous choice of the participants. o Six vendors responded to the Invitation for Bids. Of the six, four failed to fully meet the specifications. Of the two vendors who did meet the specs, DRA and Dynix, the five-year cost for DRA was $32,195 less than for Dynix. Neither DRA nor Dynix are available for use on City ( IBM) or County (HP) hardware. o Although less expensive alternatives were available and were considered, price was only one of an extensive list of features compared. The committee made it's selection based on a comparison all these features. o Staff feels it would be impossible to convince the other parties to reconsider their selection at this stage of the process. o The benefits of a joint approach far exceed those of individually implemented systems. o The terms and price of participation in the joint approach are probably much better now than they would be in the future. ALTERNATIVES AND IMPACTS: 1. Authorize the County Administrator to execute this contract on behalf of the County of Roanoke. a. $300,000 of County share to be financed by the City of Roanoke. b. County to pay for its share from funds identified during the audit for fiscal year ending June 30, 1989. 2. Do not authorize the County Administrator to execute this contract on behalf of the County of Roanoke. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board authorize the County Ad- ministrator to execute this contract on behalf of the County of Roanoke. Respectfully submitted, Elmer C. odge County Administrator Approved (x ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Yes Abs x -~ _~ ~- ACTION VOTE Motion by: StPVPn A Mc~raw/ T-- ~~vr^t~ to approve_A~ Garrett ly}~, amPn__d~d_ by Harry c' . Johnson N; ~t AnG ~~i th X60, 000 fundina McGraw fro« T,ihrary budget and Nickens balance from unapp~priatPd Robers balance cc: File John Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance Reta Busher, Director, Management & Budget George Garretson, Director, Libraries No ~~ This CONTRACT, made and entered into this day of 19 between the CITY OF ROANOKE, a municipal corporation chartered under the laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia, CITY OF SALEM, a municipal corporation chartered under the laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia, and the COUNTY OF ROANOKE, a county chartered under the laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia. W I T N E S S E T H: WHEREAS, the purpose of this Contract is to establish an integrated automated library system, and an integrated automated library system, (hereinafter referred to as "system") is an online, real-time computer system designed around a bibliographic database of MARC (machine readable cataloging) standard records for all types of library materials capable in design architecture and performance capacity of supporting multiple library acquisi- tions, cataloging, fiscal control, online public catalog, cir- culation control and management information applications; and WHEREAS, this Contract shall provide a mechanism for allo- cating and sharing costs for the integrated automated library system; and WHEREAS, $42.1-34 of the Code of Virginia (1950), as amended, authorizes any city or county to enter into a contract with any adjacent city or county to receive or to provide library service on such terms and conditions as shall be mutually agreeable; and WHEREAS, recent studies have shown that the libraries of the three jurisdictions need to make a change of basic technology by having the manual systems and records replaced by a computer- ~~ based information system which will facilitate library operations and improve library services; and WHEREAS, by this Contract the parties intend to implement and effectuate a library automation system to expand and improve library services to the citizens of the three participating jurisdictions; and WHEREAS, the library automation system is a joint undertaking by political subdivisions, pursuant to §15.1-21 of the Code of Virginia (1950), as amended, in furtherance of a proper govern- mental function; and WHEREAS, the parties to this Contract wish to establish the terms and conditions whereby the cost for the system shall be allocated among the parties in accordance with a prescribed for- mula; and WHEREAS, the parties have established an Advisory Committee to be responsible for making key decisions and setting policy for use of the system by all participating libraries; and WHEREAS, the parties have established a Library Automation Committee to manage the system during implementation and opera- tion, to develop policy and budgets, and to report to the Advi- sory Committee and administrations of the cities and county; and WHEREAS, the Library Automation Committee shall be assisted and advised by Library staff and administrative officials from each governing body. THEREFORE, FOR AND IN CONSIDERATION of the mutual covenants, agreements, obligations, and undertakings herein contained, the parties hereby covenant and agree, each with the others, as follows: - 2 _ 1. The City of Roanoke, City of Salem and County of Roanoke shall implement an integrated automated library system as mutually agreed upon by the City Council for the City of Roanoke, City Council for the City of Salem, and the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County. 2. The type of system to be acquired by the parties will perform library data handling functions as agreed upon by the Library Automation Committee. 3. The membership of the Advisory Committee shall consist of the City of Roanoke Director of Human Resources, the County of Roanoke Assistant Administrator for Human Services, the City of Salem Assistant City Manager, a representative from the Library Boards of the City of Roanoke and the County of Roanoke, the City of Roanoke Librarian, Directors of the City of Salem Public Library, and County of Roanoke Public Library. 4. The membership of the Library Automation Committee shall consist of the City of Roanoke Librarian,•and Directors of the City of Salem Public Library and County of Roanoke Public Library, the data processing managers of the Cities of Roanoke and Salem, and County of Roanoke, and the Automation Coordinator who shall be a library employee in the classified service of the City of Roanoke. 5. All public libraries of the parties to this agreement (hereinafter referred to as "participating libraries") shall abide by the policies and procedures established by the Library Automation Committee for the operation of the system. g. The City of Roanoke shall provide space, at no cost to participating libraries, to house the central site components of - 3 - ~~ the system, such space hereinafter referred to as Central Host roducts set Site. Central site components shall consist of the p forth in Appendix D, which is attached hereto and made a part of this agreement. 7. The parties shall jointly own the Central Host Site com- ponents and telecommunications equipment purchased for the system under the terms of this agreement and apportioned as shared costs in accordance with the percentages as set forth in Appendix A, attached herewith and made a part of this agreement. g. Each participating library shall be responsible for all costs involved in the creation and transfer of their own biblio- graphic records to the shared system database. All participating libraries will input, maintain and share these records according to Automation Committee. Each the procedures developed by the Library main- participating library will be responsible for establishing, twining and bearing the cost for acquiring these records from their own source. g. All records entered into the system by each participa- ting library or supplied by or for each participating library are and shall remain the property of each participating library. Each participating library agrees to share its bibliographic, authority, item, holdings, patron, and loan records with other par- rocedures, proto- ticipating libraries in accordance with policies, p the Library Automation cols and regulations established by Committee. The addition, use, and removal of these records shall be governed by the policies and procedures of the Library Automation Committee. - 4 - L/~ 10. The contract shall be for a term of three years from the date hereof. 11. IIpon the expiration of the initial term of three (3) years this Contract shall be automatically renewed annually for one year terms unless notice of termination is given by any party in writing to the other parties at least twelve (12) months prior to the end of the original term of the contract or twelve (12) months prior to the end of any one year term of renewal. Notice of termination by either of the cities or the county, given as hereinabove provided, shall constitute termination of this contract only to the termina- ting party upon the effective date of such notice of termination, which effective date shall not be sooner than the last day of the original three-year term or the last day of any one year term of renewal. The terminating party shall forfeit any equity in the system to the remaining libraries participating in the system upon proper notice of termination. 12. The total system capital and start up costs herein agreed and as set forth in detail in Appendix B, attached herewith and made a part of this agreement, shall be in an amount not to exceed $973,949.00. The total cost for maintenance and operation of the system is estimated to be $120,000.00 (in 1989 dollars) for the first full year of operation, as set forth in detail in Appendix C, attached hereto and made a part of this agreement; and for each year thereafter the total cost for maintenance and operation shall be an amount based on the actual operating costs and charges as determined by the Library Automation Committee. - 5 - J.~ v~ (a) Each jurisdiction's costs for the shared components of the automation system, including annual operating costs, shall be based on shared costs percentages as set forth in Appendix A. The percen- tages shall be adjusted on an annual basis following the initial term of this contract. (b) Upon the renewal of this contract, the percentages will be reevaluated by the Library Automation Committee in order to reflect any changes in the usage of the system occurring on the part of any participating library covered by this agreement. For the initial term of this contract, the parties' shared costs as set forth in Appendix A will be as follows: (1) Fifty percent (50~) of the purchase price and start-up costs and system maintenance, operations and telecommunications t$ettermaof thepcontracthe City of Roanoke during two percent (42~) of the purchase price and (2) Forty- start-up costs of the system and system ma n- tenance, operations and teleofmRoanokeiduringsthe shall be paid by the County term of the contract. (3) Eight percent (8~) of the purchase price start-up costs, and system maintenance, operations and tele- communications costs shall be paid by the City of Salem during the term of the contract. 13. The City of Roanoke shall act as the purchasing agent for all components of the system. 14. The City of Roanoke shall comply with the provisions of of Roanoke (1979), as amended, Chapter 23.1 of the Code of the City Chapter ? which is in accordance with the Virginia Procurement Act, of Title 11 of the Code of Virginia (1950), as amended, in the pro- curement of all components of the system. - 6 - `. ~~ 15. The parties agree that the City of Roanoke, as purchasing agent, shall be reimbursed in full for its payment of all indivi- dual library costs and expenditures for operation and services in each jurisdiction's participating libraries. This Will include rioters, light pens, modems, P payments for purchase of terming s, barcode labels, machine readable labels for patron identification cards, and database processing by system vendor as set forth in as purchasing agent, shall make Appendix A. The City of Roanoke, periodic billings to the City of Salem and County of Roanoke, no more frequently than monthly. 16. The parties agree to pay as billed their proportionate share of the cost for the system, not to exceed the following amounts Which are accurately set out in detail in Appendix B: $ 527,305 City of Roanoke - $ 36$362 County of Roanoke - $ 78,282 City of Salem - a) The County of Roanoke agrees that in consideration of the ( the City continuing library services rendered to County residents by of such of Roanoke, and conditioned upon the continued rendering services, the County shall pay to the City of Roanoke $68,362.00 1990) as partial during this fiscal year (on or before June 30, The payment for its proportionate share of the cost of the system. balance of the County's proportionate share of the cost of the the City of Roanoke. The system ($300,000) shall be paid in full by shall thereafter repay the City of Roanoke in installments of County 100,000 per year for a period of three years at 8.75% interest per annum on the remaining balance. b) Specifically, the County of Roanoke agrees to repay the ( City of Roanoke as follows: - ? - ~~~ la~~ 0 0 0 - ~~~ shall be paid to the (1) Payment is the amount of $ City of Roanoke on or before July 1, 1990; (2) Payment in the amount of $117,500 shall be paid to the 1, 1991; City of Roanoke on or before July (3) Payment in the amount of $108,750 shall be paid to the City of Roanoke on or before July 1, 1992. The obligations of the County under subparagraph (b) shall (c) be subject to and dependent upon appropriations being made from time to time by the Board of Supervisors of the County for such purpose. The County Administrator or other officer charged with the respon- sibility for preparing the County's budget shall include in the pro- posed budget for each fiscal year all amounts referred to be paid admin- under this contract during such fiscal year, and the County istrator or other such officer of the county shall use his best efforts to obtain the annual appropriation throughout the term of this contract. (d) The County reasonably believes that funds sufficient to make all payments required to be made by the county during the term of the contract can be obtained from County revenue sources and intends to make annual appropriations during the term of this agreement sufficient to make such payments. e If the County shall fail to repay the City of Roanoke for ( ) its payment of the County's proportionate share of the cost as herein agreed, the County shall forfeit any and all services, title, interest, equity and claim to the system. (f) All payments made under this agreement shall be accounted - S - J.~ "' f or pursuant to generally accepted accounting principles for politi- cal subdivisions. 17. The City of Roanoke shall make periodic billings to the City of Salem and County of Roanoke for their proportionate share of the cost of maintenance and operation, no more frequently than monthly. 18. Any additional interested parties may be considered for participation in the system by making application to the Library Automation Committee. IIpon recommendation of the Library Automation Committee to the Advisory Committee and approval of the participat- ing governing bodies, the contract may be amended to allow alloca- tion costs and participation in the system by interested parties. 19. All participating libraries are bound by the terms of ven- dor contract, which is attached hereto as Appendix D, for perfor- mance and proper use of system. 20. The use of any growth capacity must be approved by the Library Automation Committee. 21. This Contract and the attachments hereto, which are incorporated by reference, constitute the entire contract between the parties and supersedes all prior negotiations, represen- tations or agreements, either oral or written. 22. This Contract may be amended by a written amendment or modification hereto authorized by resolutions of the City Council for the City of Roanoke, the City Council for the City of Salem, and the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke. 23. This agreement shall be governed by the laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia. - 9 - ~°" IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto, each duly authorized have hereunto affixed their signatures and seals to this day of agreement, executed in triplicate as of the 1989. CITY OF ROANOKE ATTEST: Mary F. Parker, City Clerk By W. Robert Herbert City tanager (SEAL) ATTEST• ity ler (SEAL) CITY OF SALEM sy andolp mit City Ma.nag r ATTEST: Mary Allen, Clerk of the Board (SEAL) APPROVED AS TO FORS ounse lty o oano e APPROVED AS TO FORM ~~ ~. oun el, ity o alem APPROVED AS TO FORM 1M ' `~, Counsel, County of Roan ke COUNTY OF ROANOgE By Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator - 10 - ~'' Appendix A Funding for the initial purchase and ongoing support of the Roanoke Area Public Libraries Automation Project will be in three (3) forms: (1) shared costs based on the use of the agreed upon percentages; (2) individual library costs based on use which will be reimbursed to the City of Roanoke as purchasing agent for the automated system; and (3) individual jurisdiction costs which are incurred and paid by each jurisdiction independently of this agreement. Shared Costs: 1. Purchase of central computer equipment and software 2. Preparation of computer host site 3. Installation of telecommunications network 4. Conversion of patron ID machine readable file 5. Monthly hardware maintenance costs for central site 6. Monthly telecommunication circuits costs 7. Monthly personnel costs for operation of system, speci- fically an Automation Coordinator and system support staf f 8. Telecommunications equipment at the Central Host Site 9. Monthly software maintenance costs 10. Supplies necessary for operation at the Central Host Site 11. All costs for equipment insurance, i.e., theft, casualty, fire, etc. 12. Any other costs agreed upon by the Library Automation Committee Individual Library Costs: 1. Purchase of smart machine readable barcode labels 2. Machine readable labels for patron ID cards 3. Terminals, printers, light pens, modems and other peripheral equipment located within individual library buildings Individual Jurisdiction Costs: 1. Preparation of sites for terminals in individual libraries 2. Labor for bar code labeling materials 3. Machine readable bibliographic data The funding formula used for this project is based 30%the following four statistical measures: 50~ circulation; number of circulating points; 10% number of titles in the data base; and 10~ number of terminals within each library. The result of these statistical measures is an equitable breakdown of thkesha42~;candsCityfoflSalem Ci8~~of Roanoke - 50%; County of Roano ACTION NO. A-121989-6 ITEM NO . ~ "~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: December 19, 1989 AGENDA ITEM: Authorization to proceed with eminent domain for a sanitary sewer easement COUNTY ADMINISTRATOfR'S COMMENTS: ~~ BACKGROUND• The design for the Valleypointe Phase II sanitary sewer is complete and easement acquisition is underway. Agreement has been reached on all but one easement. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Staff has discussed the acquisition of a 1,032 foot sanitary sewer easement with Mr. Jesse N. Jones for the past two months. Our offer to pay 40% of the full assessed evaluation for this easement has been declined. Mr. Jones is asking ten times that amount. The requested easement is adjacent to a stream that runs through Mr. Jones property. In order to have timely construction of this project, staff requests the Board of Supervisors authorize acquisition of this easement by eminent domain proceeding. Staff will continue to negotiate with the property owner to obtain the easement at a fair value. The other property owners have agreed to accept our offer of 40% assessed value for the sewer easement required for the project. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board authorize the County Attorney to begin eminent domain proceedings to obtain the sanitary sewer easement from Mr. Jones. Respectfully submitted, Cliffo D. Craig Utility Director Approv d: ,~~ ~~ ~ ` . Elmer C. Hodg County Administrator "~ Action Approved Denied Received Referred to (x) Motion by Rob T 7ohnsonj ( ) nt3rry (' Nic-kPnG to a~t~rnve ( ) ~ ~~ rP~ommPndation cc: File Paul Mahoney, County Attorney Cliff Craig, Director, Utilities Vote No Yes Abs Garrett x Johnson x McGraw Abstain Nickens x Robers x A-121989-7 Item No. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER IN ROANOKE, VA ON TUESDAY, MEETING DATE: December 19, 1989 SUBJECT: Public Private Participation Agreement with Hansteck, Inc. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ~ S COMMENTS/:,,. f 1 ~ ,~ ~C,L-rt'~~^'~ ~+-~~ ,n , - J l~v+ .mot G7~ --(fJ~'rr.~'~-„iT ~r~GV~~~'~'~vJ~e/~+'^ l C~- /`~ ,. ~`I~YV" ~ ~~1~' ` ~~'~J' ~/li~~r~!C+~-rfi/~ - (~A'M '".~/'1i1~"t~`7~f7w~9 ~ V BACKGROUND: '~ ''zc''t/~'""" ~'"~ ~~'. Hansteck, Inc. is relocating their paint roller manufacturing business from the City of Roanoke to a vacant building on Starkey Road. Their relocation will result in $250,000 of improvements to the building, the relocation of $475,000 of capital equipment, and 52 employees. A further increase of up to 25 employees will result form the relocation. Hansteck has requested that Roanoke County fund the water and sewer utility connection fees and the sewer lateral location as local participation for their relocation and expansion. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Utility Director estimates that fees and connection will cost $7,250. The participation formula is as follows: Estimated real estate taxes on improving building $7,475.00 Estimated machinery and tools tax 3,562.50 $11,037.50 Current tax value of structure -3,098.10 Net tax increase with relocation $7,939.40 The relocation costs of $7,250 will then be met within the first tax year. FISCAL IMPACT: Funds for the participation agreement are available in the Economic Development Fund. RECOMMENDATION: '"' ,~+., Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors approve the appropriation and transfer of $7,250 from the Economic Development Fund to the Utility Fund. SUBMITTED BY: ~"'~ i ~ !~. ~~ Timothy W. Gubala, Director Economic Development APPROVED: E~ ,,,,c.f,, .~2 ~~~~ ,;~~ Elmer C. Hodge, Jr., County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION No Yes Abs Approved (x) Motion by: Harry C. Nickens/ Garrett ~_ Denied ( ) Bob L. Johnson Johnson ~;_ Received ( ) McGraw ~_ Referred Nickens ~_ to Robers ~ cc: File Timothy W. Gubala, Director, Economic Development Cliff Craig, Director, Utilities Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance Reta Busher, Director, Management & Budget ACTION NO. p,-121989-8 ITEM NO . ~' """ AT A REGULAR ELD AT THE ROANOKE R OUNTY ADMINISTRATION OENTER COUNTY, VIRGINIA, H MEETING DATE: December 19, 1989 uest for authorization to execute an agreement AGENDA ITEM: Req oint Fire and. Rescue with Botetourt County for a j Station, to acquire land and proceed with design and construction of the facility. BACKGROUND: Since August 1989, county staff has been working with the City of Roanoke to develop an agreement for the operation of a joint station in the 460 east area. The facility would serve the needs of the Bonsack area citizens and also provide protection for the eastern part of the City. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: After an update at our November meeting the Board instructed staff to bring back a decision on direction for this project in December. Since then we have continued our discussions with the City but have also met with Botetourre me tyw tYi themeforoaajoint and the possibility of a working ag station. It appears that we have reached tentative auestiontis the Botetourt County to move ahead. and that can be determined within exact location of the facility, a few days since the alternatives have been narrowed to three. In an effort to remain responsive to the City's need for a 5- minute response time we have conducted some trial ru Thef results Vinton Station into the 460 Easearse thef 5hminute .response time have been positive and it app requirement could be metablomtheabestafrom.anToverall standpoints not only viable but prob y It would save the City approximately $450,000 in land, building and equipment costs and is a plan which could be implemented o'ent quickly. We stand ready to work with Mr. Herbert on a j arrangement with Vinton if that is his desire. In the meantime, I feel we should proceed witk~ a working agreement with Botetourt County, to acquire land and begin construction of a station within a 1-mile radius of the 460/604 intersection. ~_ We anticipate an increase in cost due in part to inflation and to expenses involved with adding space for Emergency Medical Services which were not part of the original plan. The facility will be similar to the new Back Creek Station and construction could begin in the Spring of 1990, with completion set for that Fall. Community interest in the volunteer program, especially Emergency Medical Services, has been good and the Fire and Rescue Department is now developing a recruitment plan. The station will be a 24 hour volunteer operation, with the possibility of additional daylight career staffing in this station or in the Vinton station to provide back-up support if necessary. FISCAL IMPACT' The cost of the building, for reasons noted above, will be approximately $75,000 more than the bond proceeds. Once bids are received we will request the appropriation of the necessary funds to proceed. Shown below is a projection of costs: Building $375,000 Land (If not constructed at Library site) 20,000 Ambulance and Equipment 100,000 2 Paid Paramedic Firefighters (optional) 55,000 (annual) Annual Operating Expense for Rescue 10,000 Note: A refurbished, fully equipped pumper and a brush truck will be provided for the station with existing budget funds. The above figures will be reduced by the amount of any contribution from Botetourt County. RECOMMENDATION' It is recommended that the Board authorize staff to proceed with the preparation of a working agreement with Botetourt County, the acquisition of land and the design and construction of the building. APPROVED: Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ,~k~.~ ACTION Approved (x ) Motion by: Bob L Johnson/ Denied ( ) Harr C. Nickens Received ( ) Referred to cc: File Paul Mahoney, County Attorney Tommy Fuqua, Chief, Fire & Rescue Reta Busher, Director, Management & Budget Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance VOTE No Yes Abs Garrett x Johnson x McGraw x Nickens x Robers x ACTION NO. A-121989-9 ITEM NO. ~- AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: December 19, 1989 AGENDA ITEM: 1990 Legislative Program, Virginia General Assembly ~ ,v COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR' S COMMENTS : ~ ~~~~,.,,,~~,,~~~'Lu~r c~ BACKGROUND' On June 27, 1989 The Board of Supervisors recommended that the Virginia Association of Counties consider several issues for priority action by the Virginia General Assembly in its 1990 legislative session. Roanoke County called for the development of a comprehensive statewide initiative to address the problems of solid waste management (including a ban on non-biodegradable plastic and Styrofoam containers and packaging, deposits for disposable beverage containers, repeal of Section 10.1-1425 which preempts any local ordinance regulating containers or packaging or requiring a deposit, authorizing a preference for recycled goods under the procurement act, funding for regional cooperative agreements and recycling programs, and more stringent statewide enforcement of illegal dumping) and one-half cent local option sales tax. On November 14, 1989 VACO approved a series of legislative proposals which included the issues recommended by the County. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Since June 27, 1989 several other issues have come to the attention of the Board or staff which merit consideration for legislative action. These issues include: • legislation to address the funding and timing issues arising from the referendum approving the creation of a police department; • the funding of the construction of the Regional Forensic Science Laboratory; • proposals by the Roanoke County School Board; • endorsement of the VACo/VML Intergovernmental Relations Task Force; ~` b • opposition to restrictions on real estate taxes or assessments, and to limitations on "downzoning"; and • support for equal taxing and borrowing authority. The recommended legislative program has been revised to reflect Supervisor's comments and suggestions from the November 28, 1989, Board meeting. Legislative recommendations to implement between Roanoke County and Roanoke City will be Board at the conclusion of the negotiations workshops. ALTERNATIVES AND IMPACTS: STAFF RECOMMENDATION: any consolidation submitted to the and the citizen Staff recommends that the Board endorse and adopt the attached 1990 Legislative Program for Roanoke County. Respectfully submitted, 1 ~~;,,~, `~/~ . `mi'l ~ Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney Approved (x ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Action Vote No Yes Abs Motion by Rnh T TnhnGnn~Si-PVPn Garrett x x A M~C'raw to rPmnvP twn Gnhnnl JOhriSOri YP =11P4~" ^ ( 1 ) L/ 1 t-Pnt 1 nt~a 1 McGraw x x nntinn Ga1PG tax fnr Prlnnatinn N1Ckens x _(~~ nLZnnGP r-nmz i~ 1 Gnr~ hi n~ i nq ROberS arhitrai-inn fnr ~chnnl Pmn1n~PPs Harry C. Nickens/Steven A. McGraw to approve as amended - URC cc: File Paul Mahoney, County Attorney ~- (~ 1990 LEGISLATIVE PROGRAM 11/20/89 Police Department: legislation to address funding and timing issues arising from referendum approval. Support for State funding of the construction of a Regional Forensic Science Laboratory (Virginia Department of General Services, Division of Consolidated Laboratories) Support for the agreement of the VACO/VML Intergovernmental Relations Task Force and the recommendations of the Commission on Local Government Structures and Relationships Comprehensive Statewide Initiative to address the problem of Solid Waste Management and to encourage recycling Authorization for aone-half cent local option sales tax; equal taxing and borrowing authority. School Board Legislative Requests .Funding .Include enrollment loss funding in Virginia Board of Education's 1990-92 budget .Fund needed local capital improvements from statewide lottery proceeds. .Include drop-out prevention funding in State budget and provide for an equitable method of distribution of these funds to benefit all local school divisions. - - - •Otr~fi~ti~c'PHrlat"a~ a~o'n'~~1~~ L'a~t'fd~~ZlLi~aTiaif.- - 6ppas~campni~ary~arlsimdct6n~afgulsli~~chaal c~rnptoy~~~~I7RZ78)- .Local option to determine the opening date of schools .Legislation to clarify the religious exemption statute .Amend Section 46.2-873 to authorize localities to determine timing needs for school zone signalization Opposition to statewide ceiling on real estate tax increases or assessments, and to restrictions on a localit}~s ability to "downzone" land ACTION # A-121989-10 ITEM NUMBER ~...•/ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: December 19, 1989 AGENDA ITEM: Additional Drainage Engineer for the Engineering Department COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR' S COMMENTS : ~ w~ ~` /~ y , `~~,r "~^ _ ~~ ,.p,, ~ ...-r'~t-rr~.vr-~ti.,~ t~7 .~~, ~~c*r c~fi~ w`~~,:.~~FT-w~/ y~-'a'~+''~. ,~ ~ o BACKGROUND Roads and Drainage Activities were shifted from the Department of Public Facilities to the Engineering Department in early 1987. These two activities were handled by one engineer and assumed the individual would spend approximately 50~ of his time on drainage and 50% of his time on roadway matters. This engineering position was added in June, 1986 to address road concerns, particularly the 1985 Road Bond, and also the start of the Drainage Program in Roanoke County. The work load involved the design and preparation of documents for approximately $1 million of road projects, and $200,000 of drainage projects. During each of the following years $200,000 has been allocated toward drainage projects and 5106,000 allocated toward Rural Addition Road Projects. At the November 28, 1989, meeting the Board of Supervisors approved additional funding in the amount of $180,000 for drainage projects P-31 through P-55. During Fiscal Year 88-89 the Engineering Department kept time records for the various activities. During that year the personnel cost for drainage matters was approximately $28,000 and for road matters was approximately $18,500, which represents approximately 1-1/2 man years. Even with the additional time spent on these activities the Engineering Department was not able to complete the backlog of road matters, and the additional effort was to the detriment of other activities such as plan review, other County Projects, and developing systematic procedures, and files within the department. .~ SUNIlr1ARY OF INFORMATION Road and Drainage Projects have a very high public perception, require considerable more staff time to develop the project, and provide the necessary public information to the concerned citizenry. Drainage problems have to be reviewed not only for the current conditions but the potential for future aggravation of the problem due to upstream development, and the difficulties associated with working in developed areas of the neighborhood. Tremendous time is spent in working out individual construction details through the private property, the consideration of trees, buildings and other features which restrict access for construction equipment, and special items that have significance to the various property owners. Historically, engineering costs range from 4 to 10~, depending on the size of the project. As an example: a project cost of $1 million may have a projected engineering cost of 5o, whereas a project cost of $30,000 may have an engineering cost of 10$ or more. When you consider the relative size of the drainage and roadway projects, you would anticipate the engineering cost to be in the 8 to 10~ range. In addition, the time spent for community meeting, individual contacts, the preparation of various permanent, and construction easements, and the construction supervision involved in maintaining the delicate balance between project scope and the property owners right, tends to make the engineering and construction supervision cost significantly higher than the typical project. In summary the engineering, easement acquisition and construction administration for $380,000 worth of Drainage Projects, $106,000 of Rural Addition Projects, and the remaining 1985 Road Bond Projects, require that a minimum of two engineering personnel be assigned to these activities, for these projects to be handled on a reasonable timeframe and projected schedule. ALTERNATIVES AND IMPACTS Alternative No. 1: Approve the addition of an additional Drainage Engineer for the Engineering Department at an estimated cost of $35,000 per year. This additional position will allow the Engineering Department to proceed with the current Drainage Maintenance Priority list and the Rural Addition Road Projects on a timely basis. Funds for this additional position should come from the General Funds unappropriated balance. Alternative No. 2: Not approve the addition of the Drainage Engineer for the Engineering Department. Based on current work 2 ~~. load it will not be possible to complete the Drainage ~-~ Maintenance Priority list, Rural Addition Roads, and other activities on a reasonable schedule. Priorities would have to be established for the Engineering Department for the various work and certain projects may be delayed. Alternative No. 3: Not approve the addition of the drainage engineer for the Engineering Department. Contract with outside engineering firms for some activities (plan review, roads, drainage) using allocated funds. Possible delays and additional cost may be associated with this alternative. STAFF RECONIlr1ENDATION Staff recommends Alternative No. 1, and request Board of Supervisors approval for an additional Drainage Engineer, for the Engineering Department. SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: ~f'F~ ~t n Phillip T. Henry, P.E. Elmer C. Hodge Director of Engi Bering County Administrator --------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved (X) Motion by: Harry C. Nickens/ No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Steven A. McGraw to approveGarrett x Received ( ) Alt. #1 Johnson x Referred McGraw x To Nickens x Robers x cc: File Phillip Henry, Director, Engineering John Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator Keith Cook, Director, Human Resources Reta Busher, Director, Management & Budget Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance ACTION # A-121989-11 ITEM NUMBER ~ ^ ~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: December 19, 1989 AGENDA ITEM: Bushdale-Road Authorization to Acquire Right of Way 'r~~~( COUNTY ADMI`N'ISTRAT~OR'DS COMMEENTS: °i'~~' _ ~~ / ~^ 0 b , ~Zi+ BACKGROUND Bushdale Road has been placed on the Rural Addition Priority List for upgrade of the roadway for future State maintenance. Staff has reviewed several alternatives, and believes that the most feasible alternative is to provide a relocated alignment of Bushdale Road to intersect at Mayfield Drive, as shown on the attached map. Bushdale Road has been on the Rural Addition list for several years and is the oldest project that hasn't been addressed either through Rural Addition or 1985 Road Bond. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION Bushdale Road is a private roadway along a 17 foot private road easement. Bushdale Road at its intersection with Mayfield Drive is bordered on both sides by residences. The location of these houses make it virtually impossible to provide the minimum 40 foot right-of-way required for a state maintained road. Also, there is inadequate sight distance at this intersection location. Therefore, due to these constraints the alignment of Bushdale Road at Mayfield Drive will have to be relocated to reduce the damage to the private residences and to have sufficient sight distance at Mayfield Drive intersection. Based on previous discussions with the affected property owners, it is very likely that the acquisition of right-of-way µ~- will require financial payment, and in some cases may require condemnation to acquire the property. The following is a list of property owners who will be affected by the right-of-way acquisition, and a projected cost associated with the right-of- way acquisition. Property Estimated Identification # Property Owner Right-of-Way Cost 79.03-5-79 M/M George W. Cyphers 8000 79.03-5-80 Mary V. Bush 3000 79.03-5-81 Mamie Webster - 79.03-5-82 M/M Jack E. Glover - 79.03-5-83 M/M Jack E. Glover - 79.03-5-85 Bonnie Dean - 79.03-5-87 M/M Samuel A. Smith - 79.03-5-88 M/M Thomas A. Poff - 79.03-5-89 M/M Charles Poff - 79.-03-5-68.2 M/M Charles Poff - 70.03-4-29 M/M Harold D. Kelly - 79.03-4-30 Rachel H. Arthur - 79.03-4-31 M/M Ronald D. Wood - 79.03-4-32 Lelia B. Draper - 79.03-4-40 M/M Robert W. Martin 1000 79.03-4-39 M/M Robert W. Martin - 79.03-4-38 M/M Donald L. Draper 2000 79.03-4-37 M/M Donald L. Draper 1000 15000 2 n ~-~ ALTERNATIVES AND IMPACTS Alternative Number 1: Approve the acquisition of right-of- way necessary for the upgrade of Bushdale Road to Secondary Road Standards. This alternative will involve relocation of a portion of Bushdale Road, and will require the purchase of some road right-of-way. While the road construction is provided by VDOT through Rural Addition Funds, the cost associated with engineering and right-of-way acquisition are funded by Roanoke County. Therefore, funds in an estimated amount $15,000 should be appropriated from the General Fund Unappropriated Balance to proceed with right-of-way acquisition. Alternative Number 2: Delete Bushdale Road from the Rural Addition List, due to cost and concerns involved in acquisition of right-of-way. Previously Roanoke County has assumed the position that the property owners should dedicate right-of-way at no cost to Roanoke County for upgrade of private roads to Secondary Road Standards. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends Alternative Number 1, whereby, the Board of Supervisors would authorize acquisition of right-of-way as necessary for the upgrade of Bushdale Road to Secondary Road Standards, appropriate funds for the acquisition of this right- of-way, and authorize the staff to proceed with necessary right- of-way acquisition. In the event that condemnation would be required for right-of-way acquisition, these actions would be brought back for Board direction. SUBMITTED BY: Phillip T. Henry, .E. Director of Engine ring APPROVED BY: Elmer C. Hodg County Administrator ----------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ~ Motion by: Harry c' Nickens/ No Yes Abs x Denied ( ) 4tPVPn A Mc~('raw to approv~arrett ~ Received ( ) git- ~1 Johnson ~ Referred McGraw ~- To Nickens ~- Robers cc: File Phillip Henry, Director, Engineering Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance Reta Busher, Director, Management3& Budget ~-g 4 NORT6 COMMUNITY SERVICES Acquire Right-Of-Way AND DEVELOPMENT A-121989-12 Item No. ~~9 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER IN ROANOKE, VA ON TUESDAY, MEETING DATE: December 19, 1989 SUBJECT: Public-Private Partnership Agreement with Ingersoll- Rand COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND: Ingersoll-Rand is locating their new roof-bolt division on five acres in the Glenvar area of the County. Their location will result in $2,300,000 of improvements and 20 employees with a total annual payroll of $400,000. During the fifth year of business, Ingersoll-Rand projects that 30 additional employees will be hired and a building addition of 35,000 square feet will be constructed. Ingersoll-Rand has requested that Roanoke County fund the water and sewer utility connection fees as local participation for this new division. Water line extension will be requested through the Utility Department. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Utility Director estimates that water and sewer connection fees will be $33,763. Value Tax Revenue Real estate $1,265,000 $14,548 Machinery & tools $1,091,000 $ 8,182 Total revenue $22,730 The costs associated with this request will be repaid in one and one-half years. FISCAL IMPACT: Funds for this request are available in the Economic Development Fund. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors approve the appropriation and transfer of $33,763 from the Economic Development Fund to the Utility Department. SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED: Timoth W. Guba a, Director Elmer C. Hodge; Jr., Economic Development County Administrator Approved ( ~ Denied ( ) Received Referred to ACTION Motion by: Bob L. Johnson/ Lee Garrett No Yes Abs Garrett x Johnson x McGraw A stain Nickens Abstain Robers x cc: File Timothy W. Gubala, Director, Economic Development Cliff Craig, Director, Utilities Reta Busher, Director, Management & Budget Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance ACTION # ITEM NUMBER ~'' AT A REGG NIA HELDNAT THEHROANOKE OCOUNTYEADMINISTRP,TIONOCENTER COUNTY, VIR MEETING DATE: December 19, 1989 AGENDA ITEM: Acquisition of Water Systems COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR' S COMMENTS : ~~ ~~~~.,~ar'~/~ ~ , J. , BACKGROUND' The 1986 Bond Referendum approved by the voters included $1,000,000 for the purchase of privately owned public water systems by Roanoke County. To date the County has purchased the following systems: Forest Edge $131,000 Cherokee Hills $ 67,013 Carriage Hills $ 35,000 Clearbrook $ 43,000 Hollins $263,242 The remaining balance in the Bond Issue including earned interest is $477,611. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Staff is currently negotiating the purchase of three water systems from Water Distributors, Inc. and Cherry Hill Water Company. They are the Bridlewood Water System, which serves 125 customers in the Bridlewood Subdivision off Brambleton Avenue South; the Cherry Hill Water System, which serves 15 customers in the Greenhill Subdivision located in West County; and the Falling Creek Water Syst ted win East rCounty3 next to the County al ine g Creek Subdivision loca Staff has established the total value of each system using the value of wvalue used in the prior pur bases of wat r systems same method of l Motion by Although the current negotiations are a package of all three water systems, staff requests that each purchase be considered separately so that timely acquisition can occur. FISCAL• Funds are available from the 1986 Bond Issue for the purchase of water systems. Even though the 1986 Bond Issue was for General Obligation Bonds, payment on the Bonds has been and is planned to be made from the Utility Enterprise Fund for water. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Board approve the purchase of the Bridlewood Water System, the Cherry Hill Water System, and the Falling Creek Water System under the provision of and at a cost detailed in an ordinance adopted to affect the acquisitions. Submitted by: Cliffor aig, P.E. Utility Director Action Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to f Approved: Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator Garrett Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers Vote No Yes Abs ~-i AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, DECEMBER 19, 1989 ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION OF THE BRIDLEWOOD WATER SYSTEM, THE FALLING CREEK WATER SYSTEM AND THE CHERRY HILL WATER SYSTEM FROM THE PROCEEDS OF THE 1988 GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS WHEREAS, on November 4, 1986 tY~e voters of Roanoke County approved at referendum the issuance of general obligation bonds to finance the costs of improving the County's public water supply; and, WHEREAS, $1,000,000 of this referendum were allocated to the purchase of selected private water systems and wells; and, WHEREAS, these bonds were issued March 1, 1988 through the Virginia Resources Authority, and the proceeds used to acquire five (5) privately owned water systems, leaving a balance of approximately $477,000; and, WHEREAS, the Utility Director has negotiated an agreement to acquire an additional three (3) privately owned water systems; and, WHEREAS, Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter directs that the acquisition of real estate be accomplished by ordinance; the first reading of this ordinance was held on December 19, 1989, and the second reading was held on January 9, 1990. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA: 1) That the acquisition and acceptance of the Cherry Hill Water System, which serves the Greenhill subdivision located in west County, from the Cherry Hill Water Company for the sum of Eleven Thousand ($11,000.00) Dollars is hereby authorized and .' ~ ~ G- i approved. 2) That the acquisition and acceptance of the Bridlewood Water System, which serves the Bridlewood subdivision in southwest County, from Water Distributors, Inc. for the sum of Ninety Thousand One Hundred ($90,100.00) Dollars is hereby authorized and approved. 3) That the acquisition and acceptance of the Falling Creek Water System, which serves the Falling Creek subdivision in east County, from Water Distributors, Inc. for the sum of One Hundred Twenty Thousand Four Hundred ($120,400.00) Dollars is hereby authorized and approved. That the acquisition of this water system is subject to modification of the May 25, 1979 Agreement with the Town of Vinton to allow the County to provide water services within the area designated by said agreement. 4) That the sum of Two Hundred Twenty One Thousand Five Hundred ($221,500.00) Dollars is hereby appropriated from the 1988 General Obligation Bond proceeds to fund the purchases of the above-described water systems in the amounts and for the purposes described herein. The full faith and credit of the County is pledged to the payment of this bond; however the County plans to pay this bond from the proceeds of the revenues from the County water system and Utility Enterprise Fund. 4) That the County Administrator is hereby authorized to execute such documents and take such actions as may be necessary to accomplish these transactions, all of which shall be on form approved by the County Attorney. L.n~a ,x'.s .. ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ •~ r o~nj ~ stems' t r hased y oanoke Calculations for valt~ Y County. Wells have a basic value of $40,000 for 20 gpm plus $100/gpm over 20. Bridlewood ''~' Wel l # 1 Well #2 Well #3 Well #4 Storage Green Hill Well #1 Well #2 Storage Fallinci Creek "~ Well #1 Well #3 Well #4 Well #5 Storage 35 GPM $40,000 + $1,500 = $4,500 15 GPM 10 GPM $40,000 + $1,600 = $41,600 11 GPM 25,000 gallon - no value 3 Total value used $8 ,100 10.5 GPM Pumping facilities and $11,000 18.5 GPM expansion ability poorly constructed walls 10,000 gallon - no value Total value used $11,000 500 = 500 $45 35 GPM $40,000 + $1, , 92 GPM $40,000 + $7,200 = $47,200 50 GPM $40,000 + $3,000 = $43,000 50 GPM $40,000 + $3,000 = $43,000 40,000 gallon - no value Total value $17,700 Deduct for incomplete walls #4, #5 (30,000) Total value used $14~~,700 The total value used for the three water systems is $248,800. The owner of these water systems is Dewey Holdaway. Hsystems. hMre agreed to a purchase price of $221,500 for aii }hr~?them and also, Holdaway is now consi~ -, if Vinton may want tc I have not discusses Holdaway since a pas] negotiations. i i stem with Mr. to us in the j-~ ..1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, DECEMBER 19, 1989 ORDINANCE 121989-13 REPEALING ORDINANCE 83- 174 AND ADOPTING A NEW ORDINANCE REQUIRING THE FILING OF A DISCLOSURE STATEMENT OF ECONOMIC INTERESTS AND OTHER SPECIFIED INFORMATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 2.1-639.14 OF THE CODE OF VIRGINIA WHEREAS, on September 27, 1983, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, adopted Ordinance No. 83-174 requiring disclosure of personal and financial interests of certain County officers, officials, and employees pursuant to the provisions of the Comprehensive Conflict of Interests Act; and WHEREAS, said Act was repealed by the 1987 Virginia General Assembly which enacted the State and Local Government Conflict of Interests Act; and WHEREAS, this ordinance repeals and reenacts Ordinance No. 83- 174 and adopts a new ordinance to conform with the revised State Code; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on November 28, 1989, and the second reading of this ordinance was held on December 19, 1989. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that Ordinance No. 83-174 is hereby repealed. Further, a new ordinance requiring the filing of a disclosure statement of economic interests and other specified information pursuant to Section 2.1-639.14 of the Code of Virginia be adopted as follows: 1. That in addition to the members of the Board of Supervisors and the Constitutional Officers of Roanoke County, Virginia, the following persons occupying certain positions of trust appointed by the Board of Supervisors and such other persons employed by the County be, and they hereby are, designated and directed to file as a condition to assuming office or employment or continuing in such position to file a disclosure statement of their personal interests and such other information as is specified on the form set forth in Section 2.1-639.15 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and shall thereafter file such a statement annually on or before January 15, to-wit: County Administrator County Attorney Director of Economic Development 2. Nonsalaried citizen members of the following boards, commissions, or authorities shall file, as a condition of assuming office, a disclosure form of their personal interests, and such other information as is specified on the form set forth in Section 2.1-639.15:1 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and thereafter shall file such form annually on or before January 15: Members of the Roanoke County Industrial Development Authority Members of the Roanoke County Library Board Members of the Roanoke County Planning Commission Members of the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission (appointed by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia) Members of the Roanoke County Resource Authority 3. In addition to any disclosure required by sub-sections 1 and 2 of this ordinance, members of the Planning Commission, Board of Zoning Appeals, real estate assessors, and the County Administrator shall make annual disclosures of all their interests in real estate located in Roanoke County. This disclosure shall include any business in which such persons own an interest, or from which income is received, if the primary purpose of the business is to own, develop or derive compensation through the sale, exchange or development of real estate in the county. Such disclosure shall be filed as a condition to assuming office or employment, and thereafter shall be filed annually on or before January 15. 4. That the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors shall cause the forms hereinabove mentioned to be distributed no later than December 10 of each year to each officer or person required to file such a form pursuant to this ordinance or Section 2.1-639.15 or Section 2.1-639.15:1 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended. Such disclosure forms shall be filed and maintained as public records for five years in the office of the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County. 5. The effective date of this ordinance shall be January 1, 1990. On motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by Supervisor Johnson, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisor Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Brenda J. Ho ton, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Paul Mahoney, County Attorney ACTION NO. ITEM NO. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: December 19, 1989 AGENDA ITEM: ORDINANCE REPEALING ORDINANCE 83-174 AND ADOPTING A NEW ORDINANCE REQUIRING THE FILING OF A DISCLOSURE STATEMENT OF ECONOMIC INTERESTS AND OTHER SPECIFIED INFORMATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 2.1-639.14 OF THE CODE OF VIRGINIA COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR' S COMMENTS : ~ ,,~~~ ~,~~~'I.,~ w~ ~'~ CA.'~a-vc~Grru~ ~-~i .~~+-t ~ Ca .. [`acs-r+-~!~~-.~-r~-~ .-z-wc,~ /~''L ~ ,fix C~~~-c z BACKGROUND' On September 27, 1983 the Board of Supervisors adopted Ordinance No. 83-174 which required the disclosure of personal and financial interests of certain County officers, officials and employees pursuant to the then applicable Comprehensive Conflict of Interests Act. This ordinance required the filing of a disclosure form by the following individuals: County Administrator, Superintendent of Fiscal Management, Superintendent of Development, Superintendent of Public Facilities, Personnel Officer, County Attorney, County Assessor, Members of the Roanoke County Industrial Development Authority, Members of the Roanoke County Library Board, Members of the Roanoke County Planning Commission. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Virginia General Assembly in its 1987 session repealed the old comprehensive Act and adopted the new, State and Local Government Conflict of Interests Act. Section 2.1-639.14.A provides in part, as follows: • that members of every governing body, • that persons occupying positions of trust appointed by such governing bodies as may be designated by ordinance, • that certain employees as may be designated by ordinance, shall file as a condition of assuming office or employment, a disclosure statement of their personal interests and other information specified under Section 2.1-639.15 (the "long form"). ~-i Section 2.1-639.14.B provides that nonsalaried citizen members of local board, commissions and councils as may be designated by the governing body shall file the disclosure form specified under Section 2.1-639.15:1 (the "short form"). Section 2.1-639.14.F provides in part that in addition to the disclosure required under subsections A and B members of planning commissions, boards of zoning appeals, real estate assessors and all county, city and town managers or executive officers shall make an annual disclosure of all their real estate interests. Section 2.1-639.14:1 requires that constitutional officers file the "long form" with the Clerk of the governing body. This recommended ordinance amendment repeals the existing County ordinance and adopts a new ordinance in compliance with the new State Code, and references the statutory disclosure forms. The new Act, like the old Act, granted discretionary authority to a local governing body to designate by ordinance those additional persons required to file a financial disclosure form. This new ordinance continues to require certain persons (Administrator, Attorney, and Director of Economic Development) to file disclosure forms; however, new categories of reporting are suggested based upon the "long" and "short" forms; members of the board of zoning appeals, resource authority, and County-appointed members to the regional airport commission are added to the list of persons required to file. Superintendents of Fiscal Management, Develop- ment, and Public Facilities; the Personnel Officers; and the County Assessor are no longer required the file a disclosure form. During the regional meetings conducted eighteen months ago by the Attorney General's office to explain the provisions of the new act, Roanoke County was the only locality in this part of the state to require such an extensive disclosure by its officers, appointees and employees. ALTERNATIVES AND IMPACTS: 1) The Board could repeal Ordinance No. 83-174, and rely upon the mandatory disclosure required by state law (Section 2.1- 639.14.F requires members of the planning commission, board of zoning appeals real estate assessors and the county administrator to file the real estate disclosure form). Members of local governing bodies must file the disclosure form found in Sec. 2.1- 639.15. 2) The Board could repeal Ordinance No. 83-174 and adopt a new ordinance as provided in the attached draft. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board favorably consider the attached ordinance, Alternative 2). -i Respectfully submitted, ~, 1 '~ ~ . 1 Y 1. Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney , Action Vote No Yes Abs Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by Garrett Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers F~-I AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, DECEMBER 19, 1989 ORDINANCE REPEALING ORDINANCE 83-174 AND ADOPTING A NEW ORDINANCE REQUIRING THE FILING OF A DISCLOSURE STATEMENT OF ECONOMIC INTERESTS AND OTHER SPECIFIED INFORMATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 2.1-639.14 OF THE CODE OF VIRGINIA WHEREAS, on September 27, 1983, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, adopted Ordinance No. 83-174 requiring disclosure of personal and financial interests of certain County officers, officials, and employees pursuant to the provisions of the Comprehensive Conflict of Interests Act; and WHEREAS, said Act was repealed by the 1987 Virginia General Assembly which enacted the State and Local Government Conflict of Interests Act; and WHEREAS, this ordinance repeals and reenacts Ordinance No. 83- 174 and adopts a new ordinance to conform with the revised State Code; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on November 28, 1989, and the second reading of this ordinance was held on December 19, 1989. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that Ordinance No. 83-174 is hereby repealed. Further, a new ordinance requiring the filing of a disclosure statement of economic interests and other specified information pursuant to Section 2.1-639.14 of the Code of Virginia be adopted as follows: 1. That in addition to the members of the Board of Supervisors and the Constitutional Officers of Roanoke County, Virginia, the following persons occupying certain positions of (`J " trust appointed by the Board of Supervisors and such other persons employed by the County be, and they hereby are, designated and directed to file as a condition to assuming office or employment or continuing in such position to file a disclosure statement of their personal interests and such other information as is specified on the form set forth in Section 2.1-639.15 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and shall thereafter file such a statement annually on or before January 15, to-wit: County Administrator County Attorney Director of Economic Development 2. Nonsalaried citizen members of the following boards, commissions, or authorities shall file, as a condition of assuming office, a disclosure form of their personal interests, and such other information as is specified on the form set forth in Section 2.1-639.15:1 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and thereafter shall file such form annually on or before January 15: Members of the Roanoke County Industrial Development Authority Members of the Roanoke County Library Board Members of the Roanoke County Planning Commission Members of the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission (appointed by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia) Members of the Roanoke County Resource Authority 3. In addition to any disclosure required by sub-sections 1 and 2 of this ordinance, members of the Planning Commission, Board of Zoning Appeals, real estate assessors, and the County Administrator shall make annual disclosures of all their interests in real estate located in Roanoke County. This disclosure shall i~ include any business in which such persons own an interest, or from which income is received, if the primary purpose of the business is to own, develop or derive compensation through the sale, exchange or development of real estate in the county. Such disclosure shall be filed as a condition to assuming office or employment, and thereafter shall be filed annually on or before January 15. 4. That the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors shall cause the forms hereinabove mentioned to be distributed no later than December 10 of each year to each officer or person required to file such a form pursuant to this ordinance or Section 2.1-639.15 or Section 2.1-639.15:1 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended. Such disclosure forms shall be filed and maintained as public records for five years in the office of the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County. 5. The effective date of this ordinance shall be January 1, 1990. 33 DISCLOSURE/CONFLICT OF INTEREST Persons Required to File The following persons are required to file, as a condition of assuming office or employment or continuing in such position, a disclosure statement of their personal interests and such other information as is specified on the form set forth in §2.1-614 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended: * * Constitutional Officers County Administrator County Assessor County Attorney Board of Supervisors, members of * Board of Zoning Appeals, members of Industrial Development Authority, members of Library Board, members of Planning Commission, members of Personnel Officer Superintendent of Development Superintendent of Fiscal Management Superintendent of Public Facilities * any officer or employee who has a personal interest in any transaction before the governmental or advisory agency of which he is an officer or employee Distribution of Forms It is the responsibility of the Clerk to the Board of Supervisors to distribute, no later than December 10 of each year, the forms used for filing. Deadline for Filincx Deadline for receipt by the Board Clerk of the completed forms is January 15. Rept as Public Record Disclosure forms are to be filed with the Board Clerk and kept in the Clerk's office, as public records, for five years. (Ordinance No. 83-174 adopted 9/27/83) RESCINDED BY RESOLUTION NO. 121989-13 ADOPTED 12/19/89 * These two categories are not listed in Ordinance No. 83-174; they are included per memorandum dated 9-17-84 from the Secretary of the Commonwealth. * * Added per memo dated 10-6-88 from Secretary of the Commonwealth. ~-~~ 34 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT OF ECONOMIC INTERESTS Persons Required to File A. Effective January 1, 1990, in addition to members of the Board of Supervisors and the constitutional officers of Roanoke County, the following persons are directed to file annually, on or before January 15, as a condition of assuming off ice or employment or continuing in such position, a disclosure state- ment of their personal interests and such other information as is specified on the form set forth in §2.1-639.15 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended: County Administrator County Attorney Director of Economic Development B. Nonsalaried citizen members of the following commissions, boards, or authorities shall file annually, on or before January 15, as a condition of assuming office, a disclosure form of their personal interests and such other information as is specified on the form set forth in §2.1-639.15:1 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended: Industrial Development Authority Library Board Planning Commission Roanoke Regional Airport Commission (those members appointed by the Board of Supervisors) Roanoke County Resource Authority C. In addition to the disclosure required by Sections A and B above, the following persons shall make annual disclosures of all their interests in real estate located in Roanoke County: Planning Commission Board of Zoning Appeals Real Estate Assessors County Administrator This disclosure shall include any business in which such persons own an interest, or from which income is received, if the primary purpose of the business is to own, develop, or derive compensation through the sale, exchange, or development of real estate in the County. Such disclosure shall be filed as a condition to assuming office or employment and thereafter shall be filed annually, on or before January 15. Distribution and Retention D. No later than December 10 of each year, the Clerk to the Board of Supervisors is to distribute the forms to each officer or person required to file. The disclosure forms shall be filed and maintained as public records for five years in the office of the Clerk to the Board. (Ordinance No. 121989-13 adopted 12/19/89) 1.~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, DECEMBER 19, 1989 ORDINANCE 121989-14 RESCINDING ORDINANCE NO. 102489-5 AND ACCEPTING AN OFFER FOR AND AUTHO- RIZING THE SALE OF 5 ACRES, MORE OR LESS, IN THE GLENVAR WEST PORTION OF ROANORE COUNTY (SHAMROCK FIELD) BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.01 of the Charter of Roanoke County, the subject property has been declared to be surplus and is being made available for other public uses, i.e. economic development; and 2. That Ordinance No. 102489-5 accepting an offer for and authorizing the sale of ten (10) acres, more or less, in the Glenvar West portion of Roanoke County (Shamrock Field) and Item 5 of Item K - Consent Agenda - of the November 15, 1989, Board meeting authorizing an appropriation of capital funds for the Green Hill Park improvements are hereby rescinded. 3. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading was held on November 28, 1989; and a second reading was held on December 19, 1989, concern- ing the sale and disposition of five (5) acres, more or less, in the Glenvar West portion of Roanoke County (Shamrock field); and 4. That offers having been received for said property, the offer of Plantation and Kanter, G. P. for Twenty-three Thousand Dollars ($23,000) per acre to purchase five (5) acres, more or less, for One Hundred Fifteen Thousand Dollars ($115,000) is hereby accepted and all other offers are rejected; and f 5. That all proceeds from the sale of this real estate are to be placed in the capital facility account; and 6. That the County Administrator is authorized to execute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County as are necessary to accomplish the conveyance of said property, all of which shall be upon form approved by the County Attorney. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to approve ordinance without paragraph #4, seconded by Supervisor Robers, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisor Johnson, Robers, Garrett NAYS: None ABSTAIN: Supervisors McGraw, Nickens On motion of Supervisor McGraw to approve staff recommendation paragraph #4, seconded by Supervisor Johnson, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisor Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Brenda J. H lton, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Timothy W. Gubala, Director, Economic Development Reta Busher, Director, Management & Budget Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance John Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator Steve Carpenter, Director, Parks & Recreation Paul Mahoney, County Attorney Item No. ~~"' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, REIN ROANOKE,OVAOON TUESDAY,DMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: December 19, 1989 SUBJECT: Sale of 5± acres of Shamrock field COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACR(3ROIIND: Plantation and Kanter has been contracted to build a 25,000 square foot manufacturing facility on the Shamrock Park site for Ingersoll-Rand. Ingersoll-Rand will open with approximately 20 employees and foresees expanding the facility to 60,000 square feet and employing 50 semi-skilled and skilled workers. Plantation and Kanter is offering to purchase 5± acres of Shamrock Park. SUMMARY OF INFORMATIONS Plantation and Kanter is offering to purchase 5± acres of Shamrock Park at $23,000 per acre for the purpose of constructing a 25,000 square foot manufacturing facility for Ingersoll-Rand. FISCAL IMPACT: Shamrock Field is a 10.5 acre tract with one ball field located near the middle of the site. The revenue generated from the sale should greatly improve Green Hill Park. Additionally, improvements to Shamrock Field should generate a higher per acre price. The following data is based on Ingersoll-Rand plans: Real estate and building $1,265,000 Machinery and tools tax $1,091,000 Approximate annual tax revenue $ 22,730 RECOMMENDATION: 1. Rescind ordinance dated October 24, 1989 for sale of ten acres 2. Approve sale of 5± acres to Plantation and Kanter for the purpose of constructing a manufacturing plant for Ingersoll- Rand. 3. Place proceeds form sale into the capital facility account. 4. Appropriate not more than $115,000 from the capital facility account for the purpose of making improvements to Green Hill Park. 5. Authorize County Administrator to execute all necessary documents upon review by County Attorney. SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED: ~ _---- ' ~ ~~ ~ ~ ti Timot y W. Gub la, Director Elmer C. Hodge, Jr., Economic Development County Administrator ---------------- -----------------------ACTION No Yes Abs Approved ( ) Motion by: Garrett Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, DECEMBER 19, 1989 ORDINANCE RESCINDING ORDINANCE NO. 102489-5 AND ACCEPTING AN OFFER FOR AND AUTHORIZING THE SALE OF 5 ACRES, MORE OR LESS, IN THE GLENVAR WEST PORTION OF ROANOKE COUNTY (SHAMROCK FIELD) BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.01 of the Charter of Roanoke County, the subject property has been declared to be surplus and is being made available for other public uses, i.e. economic development; and 2. That Ordinance No. 102489-5 accepting an offer for and authorizing the sale of ten (10) acres, more or less, in the Glenvar West portion of Roanoke County (Shamrock Field) and Item 5 of Item K - Consent Agenda - of the November 15, 1989, Board meeting authorizing an appropriation of capital funds for the Green Hill Park improvements are hereby rescinded. 3. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading was held on November 28, 1989; and a second reading was held on December 19, 1989, concern- ing the sale and disposition of five (5) acres, more or less, in the Glenvar West portion of Roanoke County (Shamrock field); and 4. That offers having been received for said property, the offer of Plantation and Kanter, G. P. for Twenty-three Thousand Dollars ($23,000) per acre to purchase five (5) acres, more or less, for One Hundred Fifteen Thousand Dollars ($115,000) is hereby accepted and all other offers are rejected; and 5. That all proceeds from the sale of this real estate are to be placed in the capital facility account; and 6. That the County Administrator is authorized to execute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County as are necessary to accomplish the conveyance of said property, all of which shall be upon form approved by the County Attorney. AT A REGIILAR MEETING OF THB BOARD OF SIIPERVI80R8 OF ROANORE COIINTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TIIESDAY, DECEMBER 19, 1989 RESOLIITION OF APPRECIATION TO THE INDIVIDIIAL8 AND ORGANIZATIONS WHO ASBIBTED AT THE BHENANDOAH HOMES FIRE WHEREAS, on Thursday, December 14, 1989, a fire at the Shenandoah Homes retirement complex resulted in the tragic loss of four lives and personal injury to both residents and those fighting the fire; and WHEREAS, many individuals and organizations set aside their personal safety and comfort during the middle of a snowy, sub-freezing night to assist those residents during this devastating situation; and WHEREAS, members of the Roanoke County Sheriff's Office began the evacuation of the residents; and WHEREAS, six fire companies and eight rescue squads responded to the fire, performing in a heroic manner at all times; and WHEREAS, in the true spirit of regional cooperation, neighboring localities offered their assistance by manning the stations who responded to the fire and Roanoke City rescue squads joined in the evacuation process; and WHEREAS, the staff and residents of Shenandoah Homes facilitated the efforts of the fire and rescue personnel using their knowledge and skills learned in previous fire drills; and WHEREAS, the Roanoke County School System provided school buses to transport the residents of the retirement home to an emergency evacuation center; and WHEREAS, Peggy and Raymond Setchel offered the use of the Star City Roller Skating Center as an emergency evacuation shelter. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, wishes to express its pride and admiration to those individuals and organizations for their many efforts to aid the residents at the Shenandoah Homes retirement complex; and FIIRTHER, The Board, on behalf of the citizens of Roanoke County, expresses its deepest appreciation for the heroic deeds that were performed by so many with little thought to personal comfort and safety. 1 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: December 19, 1989 AGENDA ITEM: Requests for Public Hearing and First Reading for Rezoning Ordinances Consent Agenda COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND' The first reading on these ordinances is accomplished by adoption of these ordinances in the manner of consent agenda items. The adoption of these items does not imply approval of the substantive content of the requested zoning actions, rather approval satisfies the procedural requirements of the County Charter and schedules the required public hearing and second reading of these ordinances. The second readings and public hearings for these items are scheduled for January 23, 1990. The titles of these ordinances are as follows: 1. An ordinance to amend the Future Land Use Map designation of an approximately 105 acre tract generally located west of Carson Road between Route 11/460 and Carson Road, in the Hollins Magisterial District, from Development to Principal Industrial, and to rezone said property from R-E to M-1, upon the request of the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors. 2. An ordinance to rezone a 3.9 acre tract from B-1 Conditional to B-1 Conditional (Amendment of Proffered Conditions), generally located on the north side of Route 419, at the intersec- tion of Chaparral Drive in the Cave Spring Magisterial District, upon the petition of Fralin & Waldron, Inc. 3. An ordinance to rezone approximately 29 acres from M-2 to R-1, generally located off of Route 939 (Aerospace Rd.) in the Vinton Magisterial MT ~+ Y 2 District, upon the request of Aerospace Research Corporation. 4. An ordinance to rezone a 1.01 acre tract from M-1 Conditional to M-1 Conditional (Amendment of Proffered Conditions), and to conditionally rezone a 1.016 acre tract from B-2 to M-l; said tracts generally located behind 3707 and 3655 Brambleton Ave, in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District, upon the petition of Brambleton Storage Corporation. 5. An ordinance to conditionally rezone a .68 acre tract from B-2 to M-1, located at 4920 Cove Rd., in the Catawba Magisterial District, upon the petition of Professional Services Industr- ies Inc. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends as follows: (1) That the Board approve and adopt the first reading of these rezoning ordinances for the purpose of scheduling the second reading and public hearings for January 23, 1990. (2) That this section of the agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth as Items 1-5, inclusive, and that the Clerk is authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this action. Respectfully submitted, r ' ~~ ~T~ Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney Action Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by Garrett Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers Vote No Yes Abs ~~~ ate Kec.: ~_ eceived By: ase No.: OCT $~ ~ Ord. No.s ROANOKS 1. Owner's COUNTY REZONING APPLICATION Pl~lf~{IMC~ ~Dgtt16 ~ ~"'~ _ n ~ ~IINO~y-tE}'00~1~t~ Name : 'i~~F~~~~ ~' ~"~ -/''1 L _ Phone Address: P•D, gnX l~~7S U~ Zyois' 2. Applicant's Name: (Gc1~nNu'~ ~ d~ ~ SU~12ld~Jrrn'ZS' Phone: Address: 3. Location of Property: l2`~• ~l ~~G O d~.Q l:a/rS-tM Tax Map Number (s) : J" ' ~~ - 4. Magisterial District:_ ~~th 5. Size of Property: 6. Existing Zoning: ~~ S ~ ~'Sf~!s' 2 ~ Existing Land Use: ~/ 7. Proposed Zoning: Proposed Land Use: 8. Comprehensive Plan Designation: /Y/I~fnSrfZ-tM ~~ ~~~y~~lC 9. Are Conditions Proffered With This Request? Yes / No (If you are voluntarily offering proffers as a part of your applica- tion, these proffers must be in ~rriting. A member of the Planning Staff can assist you in the preparation o-f t/hese proffers.) 10. Value of Land and (Proposed) Buildings: /vB~T Acl~r: ~w~~~~. 11. Check°If°Bnclosed~Applicationb~Til1 NotiBe AcceptedlIf AnynOfPThese Items Are Kissing Or Incomplete: / Letter of Application - Concept Plan Metes and Bounds Description _~ List of Adjacent Owners of Property (Attach Exhibit A) _3~ vicinity Map -- Application Fee _~~ Written Proffers Water and Sewer_Application,._ (If ;;Applicable) 12. Signature Of Property Owner, Contract Purchaser, Or Owner's Age VC/ • Date /~ ~~/ ~~_ Signature AN ,~. p ~8 ~ 88 8~8QUICEtiTENN~~~ A Batrai~r-Bcginning C~nunf~ of LRnttnulu 1~~ DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT M 8 M O R A N D O M TO: Terry Harringto~~ Director, Planning and Zoning FROZi: Timothy Gubala NI7irector, Economic Development DATE: October 19, 1989 8IIB.7ECT: Rezoning application - Fralin & Waldron, Inc. Lowe property On behalf of the Board of Supervisors I am submitting an application for the rezoning of approximately 105 acres from Residential Estates RE to Industrial District M-1. This property is one of several evaluated as part of the 1989 study of potential industrial sites that was initiated by the Board of Supervisors. Please note that the Concept Plan and water and sewer application are not included because there is not a user for the property. t, Rezoning of the property must precede the detailed site planning. Several proffered conditions are listed that affect permitted uses, access to the property, restrictive covenants, and Master Development Planning. The property will not include permitted uses for: a. Automobile painting, upholstering, repairing, rebuilding, reconditioning body and fender work, truck repairing or overhauling; b. Manufacturing of pottery and figurines or other similar ceramic products; c. Veterinary hospital and commercial kennels with exterior runs and yards; d. Flea markets, unless a special exception has been granted by the Board of Supervisors. e. Seed and feed stores. Please advise me with your comments and questions. Thank you. P.O. BOX 29800 • ROANOKE . VIRGINIA 24018-0798 • (703) 772-2069 FAX. NO.: (703) 772-2030 ~t~ ~~ ~u~~~~~e Z-~ ~~~ DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT M g M O R A N D II M TO; Terry Harrington, D~rector, Planning and Zoning FROli: Timothy W. Gubala,~~`Director, Economic Development DATB: September 25, 1989 SIIB.T$CT: Land Use Plan Amendment for Fralin and Waldron, Inc. property on Route 11/460 (formerly Lowe property) Bacltground Fralin and Waldron purchased the property from Dr. Richard Lowe in 1988. Roanoke County Economic Development staff evaluated this as being a potential industrial site and recommended that the Board of Supervisors amend the Comprehensive Plan and rezone the property so that it could be used for future industrial development. ~teguested Land Use Plan Amendment: It is requested that the Comprehensive Plan be amended from Development to Principal Industrial. The Core designation on the frontage should remain to promote mixed use development of the entire site. effect of the Amendment on Surrounding Prot~erties: The site is adjacent to Route 11/460 on the northwest. Scattered large lot residences are across this road and along Carson Road to the north and east. Several residences are to the south. The general. area character is rural residential. Buffering and screening will be required to protect the industrial uses from adjacent residential areas. Mixed use development with office, retail and flex-space is proposed to ensure compatibility with residence uses. Access from Route 11/460 should be at specific entrances rather than from each individual property. A master plan is recommended prior to development. seasons for the Amendment: The Roanoke Valley is deficient in "ready ~o go" industrial sites to offer to prospective industrial clients from outside the Commonwealth. The Board of Supervisors adopted strategy for FY 89- 90 is to take action to encourage industrial site development through changes in land use, zoning, water and sewer extensions and long range highway planning. Opportunities for public-private partnership exist to implement site development by the privat P.O. BOX 29800 • ROANOKE . VIRGINIA 24016-0796 • (703) 772-2069 FAX. NO.: (703) 772-2030 ~ eu~w~/y-Be~R~nB ~~' SeCtOr. Since this site is in single ownership by an established real estate development firm; site development can be controlled and managed in a positive manner. justification for the Amendment: Existing Land Use Pattern. Opportunity for controlled development of a large tract that could set the development pace and criteria for the remainder of the 11/460 East Corridor. Existinq_Zoninq - Currently residential in area. This property and several other sites in the area are proposed to be part of a new East County Industrial area adjacent to the Route 11/460 Corridor. Potential Industrial Site - Considered as a potential industrial site by the 1989 study initiated by the Board of Supervisors. Employment center - None existing but proposed as part of East County Industrial area. Topography - Site is within the 10$ slope criteria land use determinant. Flood Hazard - Outside floodplain boundaries. Water supply - Water off site in Carson Road. Sewer service - Sewer service main line in Glade Creek. A 15" sewer lateral is through property to Route 11/460. ccess - Access points should be located from Route 11/460 to minimize the number of entrances. 'rransnortation Center - Adjacent to Route 11/460. Urban sector - Property is within Urban Service Sector. __- _ ~------__~__J____..__~.___._. _.__. . ~''~ i NT ~ E OrV ~ ~~ 1 I .L 4- `~ ~. ~~ '•. M ti .,'• .~ e • - • '•. ` •, ~. `~ •, off'" 'sx ' ,,. • ~= ~~... ~; ~'` ~; .~roo JA /9716 • .4NNEXAT/IGW ~~',<>~ ~/ `. : ~ v Zoning: RE Comprehensive Plan Designation: Development transition Access: Challenger Road (Route 460j Water: On site Sewer: On site Availability: Owner is willing to sell and/or jointly develop for mixed use. Recommendation: Amend Comprehensive Plan to Principal Industrial; Rezone site to M1. Fiscal Impact: None Department of Lowe Property Economic Development 105 acres ~~~?7 2d, 2~ . ~.. ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. ~~ `~ ~ ~,`~ ~ ROANOKE COUNTY NOV 21 ~ REZONING APPLICATION I~f+`~ ~i~tllttG, t~Wn,.. ' ~ ~~4KE 's Name: Fralin & Waldron, Inc. ~ Phone: '989-0000 c/o W. Heywood Fralin - 3912 Electric Road, S. W. Roanoke,~Virginia Zip= 24018 tion of Property to be Rezoned: Approx. 3.9 acres on North side of Rt. 419 at intersection of Chaparral Drive 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 87.06-4-1 & New Tax Map ~: same as old Old Tax Map #: 87.06-4-2 Magisterial District Location: Cave Spring Size of Property: approximately 3.9 acres acres/sq. ft. Existing Land Use: unimproved Existing Zoning: Business B-1 with proffered conditions Proposed Land Use: Business B-1 with amended proffered conditions Comprehensive Plan Designation: Transition Are Conditions being Proffered? Yes x No Proposed Annual Gross Revenue: Value of Land: Value of (Proposed). Buildings: 12. Value of Machinery & Tools: Number to be Employed: 13. Check Completed Items: Consultation Letter of Application ,t Legal Forms x Application Fee x 8~" x 11" Concept Plan x List of Adjacent Properties ing Signs Issued fC. 14. Applicant's Signature: By; /i(/~ ~~(/i~.l~ ". its t orney 15. Owner's Consent, if different than applicant: Name Signature: ----------------------------------------------------------------------- OFFICE USE ONLYs Application Deadline: Hearing Date: Received By: Date Received: Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: Action: ; . ,' VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE HOARD OF COUNTY SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY A 3.9t acre parcel of land, ) generally located at North ) intersection of R an Chaparral Drive ) within the Cave Spring Magisterial District, andf 4 recorded as parcel ~ 87.56-4-2 & AMENDED PROFFER OF CONDITIONS , in the Roanoke County Tax Records. ) TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY: Being in accord with Sec. 15.1-491.1 et seq. of the Code of Virginia and Sec. 21-1O5E. of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance, the Petitioner Fralin & Waldron, Inc. hereby voluntarily proffers to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia the following conditions to the rezoning of the above-referenced parcel of land: (1) To develop the subject property in substantial conformity to the site plan dated March 28, 1988, by Buford T. Lumsden & Associates, attached hereto as Exhibit "A" (2) To construct a fence along the boundary of the subject property at points where the subject property abuts with lots containing single family residences. (3) To plant appropriate ground cover vegetation on the slopes of the subject property. ~-' t~~d, By: ~ Petiti ner Its ttorney ~ ~ ~ ~ ~t ~~~ -~ ,~ ~~~~~ R ~ ~! ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ,: t ~~l~~ i~ I~i=~.sa~c t $_ .__ ~ ~ ~ ~i ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ R ~ ~1 ~ ~. € ~~~~ ~~~ ~~ ~~ a~ ~ ~ 1 ~ !i ~~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ i. ~j~1 ~i ~ . ~ • ~ ~~ ! i ~ :~ ~~ ~~1~~ ~~~ ~~ ~ is E ~ ~ ! i~ ~ ~~ ~ , ~ R t ~~ ~~ ~a ~ ' _ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ 1 tl s ~ ~ t !r i i ii = 1~ t .~\ ~~ rl ~~ ~ / ~ ~~f . `~ ~' ~J! ~3 aa jjSSS ~ p~• ~ ~~ ~~. / f,~ y ~~1 't~ ~~>~ ~~ i~ ~~ a O ~ ~~i y ~~q ~ :`. ~`+ J.~_. ,:.. ~~My~ ~ii:~1 ,, ,...~ , . ~-2 ' ~. ~a \ ~, ,`f ;QO ., ~~~!i \ ~ •~ +77j "~ J•- • ~ - \; - i i ~~ 1 M~' - M ` ~ ~ M • ~~ . ~tj ; • _. ~ 1S _ i L' r --i ~ - - ~ d 1 ,~~'"' e ~ ~ 1 1 i ~ l~ i~ ; ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ t ! 0 ~'~~_~I ,• ~ ;, ,~ : - T ~ ~ • I~~ i~l i ,`~ 1~ ~ . a i. :~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ r 4_ s ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~~~ ~l~~~ -r •~ - • - ~ • ~ . ~.. ~ ,.~ > :; ~ = ~; .~ - .I I ~~~~ ~ ~ ~! 3 ~ ~ ~ - ~ 3 ~I ( : i •~"~ ( s iii ~:.;~i~~ r ~~ • ~ ,~ 3 ~ • _ , .~ a NORTB ~~ ^. 419 ~, r/ .~ ,•.. 63 ~ ~ .., ~ ~ ~ 16 . ,, ~ i, .» / .: „s ',ate y. !~~ \' 17 \'' 3 ~ .1I ~ ~ s~. d !p~ g irr ~~ 4 / ~W~~ ~~ :` ~ ~ ~ Y 't. ~ ~ t r! , ~ ~i / ~ 16 Ac M ~ ~~ +bo s+°s ~ O e.~:. : i ~,. ., ~- ,, s a ~ ~ • ;,. : es •~ 10 ~ .~ r ~ / w ,.. ..w ~r.~ / ~ r„' ~` ~ 3 ~~~ ~_/ 223Ac b ~ 4 . / ~ as Z ' ~ ~ . 10 =o ~. ~ ~. • ~ -~ ~ r~ 9 19 r ~ '/ 11 ~ a ~y , • • ~>z''__ .~ ~... i . '.\I FRALIN & WALDRON INC. COMMUN]TYSBRYlCB.4 AMEND CONDITIONS AND DByBLOPMBNT ~y `~~ .~~ tiJ' ~~ z a~ ~~ Date Rec.s "~ Received By: Case No.: Ord. No.: ROANOlC!'s COUNTY REZONING APPI.~CA~IVN 1. Owner's Name: Aerospace Research Corporation Phone: 342-2859 Address: 5454 Aerospace Road, Roanoke, Virginia 2 . Applicant ~ s Name: Joseph T. Hamrick Phone: Aadress: 4353 Windy Gap Drive 3. Location of Property: Off Route 939 -Aerospace Road Tax liap Number(s) : Parcel:~~1~`-:-.90.:00-3-12, Parcel ~f2 - 90.00-3-23 4. Magisterial ~~istrfct: Vinton 5. Si::e of Property: Farcel #1 ~_ 22..5 Acres Parcel N2 - 5.55 Acres ~' _ _ ~ G. Existing Zoning: .t-2 ~ ~_6~'~~.,~~'~'S~ Existing Land Use: Lu y,acn,u-r ~ ~° ~ ,.t l 7 Proposed Zoning: R-1 ~'~°' N ~- Proposed Land Use: Subdivision Development ~_ 8. Comprehensive Plan Designation: ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ 1~:~>>~~-~,/~/ 9. Are c'`onditions Profferen With This Req•~est? Yes N~ X . (I.f you are voluntarily ottering proffers as apart o~ dour ~. i „d- t.ion~ these proffers must be .in un'~ting. A zember of thR Pl. 5tatt can assist you ~n the preparation of these proffers.) 10. Value of Land ~(~4~(XQf~tX`X~(~I~(XYX3~~; parcel ~#1- $19,576 Parcel ~/2- $2,500. il. rLs Following Items Hust Be Subaitted With This Application. r~4aYe ChecJic If Enclosed. Application Nill Not Be Accepted If Any Gf These Itess Are Missing Or Incomplete: S Letter of Application g Concept Plan g Metes and Bounds Description x List of Adjacent owners of Property (Attach Exhibit A} g vicinity Map % Application Fee N/A Written Proffers Water and Sewer Application (If Applicable} 12. S ignature Of Property Owner, Contrac= Purchaser, .- Or Owner ~ s gent: Signature ~ cC/~ Date /~ L o ~ _. . •1 . ~ ~a, AEROSPACE RESEARCH CORPORATION ~~' `~ 5454 AEROSPACE RD. - ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24014 TELEPHONE 342-2859 AREA E 703 ~, • :. CSC ~~ ..,;.." • ~J November 20, 1 ,• ~= ~a s:G, Ncr~ Planning Staff ~ ~ ,,, ." .'~ Roanoke County Administration Center . • ••" ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 3738 Brambleton Avenue, SW ~. ~ err :.; ~;'.. • ~ P.O. Box 29800 1`e' ~' C:~• ;-~ Roanoke, Virginia 24018-0798 , `~J- Subject: Rezoning of 22.5 acres of Aerospace Research Corpor Property from M-2 to R-1 Gentlemen: The subject request is made in order to utilize the property to best financial advantage' of the corporation. As there is no access to public water or sewers on the property, there has been little interest on the part of would be industrial users. The location of the property is such that there is very little chance of extension of public water or sewer across back creek to it. On the other hand, the property is in the schist and granite geologi-. cam zone of the Blue Ridge and the soil peres well for household septic systems. Drilling wells for water is not expected to be a problem. Of four wells drilled on the property there has been adequate water from each. There are only two homes and a mobile home within one mile of the pro- posed subdivision. One home is occupied by Mr. Howard Patsel and the other by Kr. Otha C. Wheeler and wife on JAE Valley Road. Their addresses are: Howard C. Patsel 4065 Aerospace Road Roanoke, Virginia~24014 Otha C. Wheeler 3999 JAE Valley Road Roanoke, Virginia 24014 The vacant land across Back Creek is believed owned by: Lowrie R. Glasgow Bluefield Community Professional Building Suite 305, 510 Cherry Street Bluefield, West Virginia 24701 Because of the sparseness of homes in the area, the remoteness of the location, and the fact that R-1 is a more desirable zoning than M-2 for any would be future home builders in the area, it is believed that newspaper advertizing would be fruitless and not needed unless stipulated by statute. AEROSPACE RESEARCH CORPORATION ROANORE, VIRGINIA Page 2 We would appreciate your prompt attention. to this matter. Very truly yours, AEROSPACE RESEARCH CORPORATION ~v~ J. Joseph T. Aamrick President JTH/~ m NORTB I ',. < " ~ ~ . ~ O~ ~O 3 / Date Rec .: ate' / ~~ /~ Received By / Case No.: Ord. No.: ROANORS COIINTY REZONING APPLICATION 1. Owner's Name: Brambleton Storage Corporation Phone: 989-8011 Address: P.O. Box 8636, Roanoke, Virginia 24014 2. Applicant's Name: Same as Ovner Phone: Address: 3. Location of Property: Northern aide of Brambleton Avenue Tax I+Lap Number(s) : 77.09-4-52.1 4. Magisterial District: Windsor Hills 5. Size of Property: 1.01 Acres 6. Existing Zoning: M-i Existing Land Use: Unimproved (` Proposed Zoning: M-1, Amendment to previously proffered conditions Proposed Land Use: Mini-i~larehouses 8. Comprehensive Plan Designation: Urban Development 9. Are Conditions Proffered With This Request? Yes I No ~Zf you are voluntarily offering proffers as a part of your appl~ca- t~on, these proffers must be 3n wrlt3.ng. A member of the Planning Staff can assist you in the preparation of these proffers.) 10. value of Land and (Proposed) Buildings: Land - $32,800.00 11. The Following Items Must Be Submitted With This Application. Please Chec]c If Enclosed. Application Mill Not He Accepted If Any Of These Iteas Are Kissing Or Inco~lete: % Letter of Application X Concept Plan -~ Metes and Bounds Description x List of Adjacent Owners of Property (Attach Exhibit A) Vicinity Map g Application Fee x Written Proffers ~- Water and Sewer Application ~ (If Applicable) 12. Signature Of Property Owner, Contract Purchaser, Or Owner's Agent • BRAMBL N_ S ORAGE T Signature By: Date November 20, 1989 a tze s orney .~ ~- WOOD8, ROOS$S Ee $A2LSOROVS lod Fawxictix Rown, S.W. P.O. Box 720 ROwNOYE• V1aO1Niw 24004-0720 TELE% 3792016 TELCCOPIER f03 902-4216 TELCPHONE 703 902-4200 DIRECT DIAL NUMOER 982-4252 November 27, 1989 Roanoke County Planning Department 37 38 Brambleton Avenue, SW Roanoke, VA 24018 Re: Brambleton Storage Corporation: ~ Mini-Warehouse Rezoning Roanoke County Tax Parcel Nos. 77.09-4-52 & 77.09-4-52.1 Gentlemen Enclosed herewith please find the following items with respect to the above project: 1. Roanoke County Rezoning Application with respect to Parcel No. 77.09-4-52. You will recall that this. Application was previously filed by John Parker but that the name of the applicant was incorrect and there was an incorrect reference to the existing zoning. Hence, the enclosed Application is intended to replace the prior filed application. 2. Proffer of Conditions with respect to the property which is subject of the Application in Paragraph 1 above. 3. Rezoning Application with respect to Parcel ' No. 77.09-4-52.1. This property is currently zoned M-1 subject to proffers submitted at the time the property was zoned in September of 1984. This Appli- cation is for the purpose of amending the previously proffered conditions by substitution of a new Concept Plan for the "site plan" previously proffered. ~ ~~ Roanoke County Planning Commission November 27, 1989 Page 2 4. Our check in the amount of X70.00 in payment of the Application fee for the amendment referred to in Paragraph 3 above. It is our understanding that both of these matters will be on the Planning Commission's agenda for its January 2nd meeting. Thereafter, it will be before the Board of Super- visors at their meeting scheduled for January 23rd. Please let me know if you have any questions or need anything further. As always, we appreciate your help and (~ cooperation. Yo rs very trul 'u~ ~• Michael R. Smeltzer MRS/lgb Enclosures cc: Mr. W. S. Woody (w/encs.) Mr. John T. Parker (w/encs.) z yl VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY A 1.01 acre parcel of land, ) generally located on the north) side of Brambleton Avenue ) within the Windsor Hills ) AMENDMENT Magisterial District, and ) OF PROFFERED recorded as Parcel ) CONDITIONS No. 77.09-4-52.1 in the ) Roanoke County Tax Records. ) T'O THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY: WHEREAS, your Petitioner, Brambleton Storage Corporation, a Virginia corporation, respectfully files this petition to .amend the proffered conditions pursuant to Sec. 21-105 of the ~IRoanoke County Zoning Ordinance and in accordance with the Code ~oF Virginia of 1950, as amended, and would respectfully show the following: 1. The Petitioner is the owner of the above-referenced parcel of land (the "Property"). 2. The Property is presently zoned under the provisions of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance as M-1, Light Industrial District. 3. The Property was rezoned from B-2 to M-1 by Ordinance enacted on September 18, 1984, subject to a Proffer of Conditions, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "A". AY ~ ~ ~a~ ,A~ :~, v~ 4. Item 6 of the Proffered Conditions is a proffer of the "site plan". The Petitioner has been advised that the proffered site plan provides for the development of the Property in a manner inconsistent with the ordinances of Roanoke County. '~ a ~' -~ ~• ~~ ~T :; f- z w ~c 0 v 0 E- `~ VIRr,I:~fA: R::YnaE THE 3nAHD nF SUI`!:fV[S(1RS n!'' I:OA*!OKh: COUNTY ) k~k;OF Fh'R Brambleton Mini Ma rehouses ) OF 3700 Block Brambleton Ave. ) COyDITIOIIS Roanoke. VA. ) ) The petitioner hereby voluntarily proffers to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia the following condition(s) to the zoning request herein- above set forth: 1. To slope the bank. 2. To hydro-seed the bank so as to stabilixc it with grass and shrubbery cover, 3. To remain responsible for the slope and to correct promptly any erosion that may occur, 4. To limit the permitted uses to mini warehouses. S. And to create an attractive exterior by painting the metal or covering with natural wood. 6. To abide by the offered site plan. f~ a Petitioner E~iIBIT "A" „S,. 1.ISIHXd ~~ ~o t ~''.~+ a~~ ~~-. < ~~~ ~~~•. :. 5r ' =~ 2 !~ i~ r i~•~~ N • ~... I ~ I ' I ~~ I i t-- ~- - - L-' I . ~. f r ' ~ -r s ~..s.'-. ~#~ i.- r ~ Z ~ L~ ..L'" ~ ~ ~ _~ S- ~ N V e (~ ~~^ j ~ 1~; ~ ^~ ~ `t 5Q ~ i €H E~ ~ _ ~ ! .: ~ ~ F R ~ a~ ~ J ~ ~'• o~ ~ m i 11 1i:.i 3j _ _ ~~ ~~~ l ..._ .l__ t ' i .ava ~_~~~- ~ '~~ 'a 'T 1 I I ' ~i '~ { i ;-. r ~i t J •1 ~~y ~ ~M}IIJPJ ~~L s :~ .~ ~ ~ ~ ,~~ ~" I „a,~.,, ~ co.• W to n. aq • II1. i ~. ~~,~ ~. i v jt ~~ 1!. :~ : ~: _! i:! i Z~1 :_~ s {~ ! is •3i ie is _ ~ !;L a ez• ~~ ~_! is ~~~~~ t~' i~ i~ - ~ ~ - ~'~ :.~1~~ ~' ilei ~:3 ls~s ~~ ~_' ! ! !~ ~i~rl ta~- 3:~ ~slii ::.~!! ~! l:~~ i _ _ . : ~i; is !_; !• i !. ci =~ ~ tt ff ct.~ . ~ {: : i { ~~~i135e~ja== ~!~ ~~! ~i i~ :~~~ t`~ r~a ~!~ a~~~ ai ROANOKE COUNTY REZONING APPLICATION ~~~ . Date Rec.: Received By: Case No.: Ord. No.: ~~ 1. Owner's Name: Brambleton Storage Corporation Phone: 989-8011 Address: P.0. Box 8636, Roanoke, Virginia 24014 2. Applicant's Name: Same as Owner Phone: Address: Same 3. Location of Property: Northern side of Brambleton Avenue Tax Map Number(s) : 77.09-4-52 4. Magisterial District: Windsor Hills 5. Size of Property: 1.016 Acres (44,250 sg. ft.) 6. Existing Zoning: B-2 Existing Land Use: Unimproved Proposed Zoning: H-1 Proposed Land Use: Mini-Warehouses 8. Comprehensive Plan Designation: Urban Development 9. Are Conditions Proffered With This Request? Yes x No (If you are voluntarily offering proffers as a part of your appl.ica- t~on~ these proffers must be in Mr~t.ing. a member of the Planning Staff can assist you in the preparation of these proffers.) 10. Value of Land and (Proposed) Buildings: Land $27,500.00 11. The Following Items Must Be Submitted With This Application. Please Checlt If Enclosed. Application Mill Not Be Accepted If Any Of These Iteas Are Missing Or Incomplete: R Letter of Application R Concept Plan R Metes and Bounds Description * List of Adjacent Owners of Property (Attach Exhibit A) * Vicinity Map * Application ~'ee x Written Proffers X Water anc~ sewer Application (If Applicable) -~~ese items previously submitted. 1 ~ . S ignature Of Property Owner, Contract Purchaser, Or Owner's Agent: Signature BRAMBL TO'N,.ST/OR/AGE RPORATION Date November 20, 1989 By: c ~R~~E' [ . Michael K. Sme tzer is Attorney i VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY A 1.016 acre parcel of land, ) generally located on the north) side of Brambleton Avenue ) within the Windsor Hills ) PROFFER Magisterial District, and ) OF recorded as Parcel ) CONDITIONS No. 77.09-4-52 in the ) Roanoke County Tax Records. ) TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY: -~-~ Being in accord with Sec. 15.1-491.1. et seq. of the Code of Virginia and Sec. 21-1O5E of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance, the Petitioner, Brambleton Storage Corporation, 'hereby voluntarily proffers to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia the following conditions to the rezoning of the above-referenced parcel of land (the "Property"): 1. The Property will be developed in substantial compli- ance with the Concept Plan filed herewith, said Plan made by T. P. Parker & Son, Engineers & Surveyors, Ltd., dated November 20, 1989. 2. The rezoned property will be used only for the purpose of constructing and operating mini- warehouses thereon. Respectfully submitted, u• ~s roc ~oEns ~ tuaEO~ovE ~o~~, v~ BRAMBLETON STORAGE CORPORATION By. C~ ~. •Mic ael R. Smeltzer, s Attorney ~, ~, ~. z .~ t ti .... ~__ i~ ,~ r ~~ ,=: _ .- ~:,~. '~'~;.;. : ~ ~ I .. ,.v.~.,... ~ ~~~'s.~ , .~Q~ I ~ t ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ i r ~ •, ~: . ~ ~ i x , i w i ~ .r ~ r I i j ;~ t 8 g 8 +~ ~ ~ o~ o ~; i ~ ~~ ~ ~ X ~ I \ ! I 5 ~ ~ i s x ~~ ~ I ~~ ~ ~ t' -M.AO,~iN. i ~ .X-~- 1 1 (' (i I ~ ~ Ii J.tr . y ~ ~ ~ ~ Z 1 - • S • e3 ° f ~ ## g ~ t .: ~ ,11' ~ i= ~i i ~_~ ~ t ~, i ...~. -- MI•fA[M~l \~~~ ~~ ~ptMMM710~1 ~ ~_. ~_ ~ 27 w ~uir~ti.~w rrr - y. ~ ~ iriv ~ LA ALIV. .-Maws .a•~:iw ~ z $~ ~ . ~ ~; ~~ b !~ 2 ~' ~ ~ ~~ !+ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ I~ j ~ i ~. ~~ 'i ~ 4 ~~ ~~ ~, t ~~ .. v .~ ~- ~ ~ 1 ~Od • a +~ e n o~ ye r r ~ r a ^ ~ '~ u , • M ~ J~ ~ ~ ,14 _ ~ • ~. e ~ r~ O ~ ~ I qua ~. ~ 11 Zb 26 29 !. 30. ~ Y ~~ 0 Z! ,~ t4 a Qo ~ o0 - a ~ = • ~ aftl ~ afis - ; ~AiO - ~ - a~oe • ~ ' ' ~ ~~ • o s' v ~' e~~ •. ~ .- • n a k ~ o~ ,. 4 O N .. • ~.6~ oc = .. SA ~~ ~ • aN ac ~ .r !o 1 . ~ ~ ~, v ~a e+ 1!] ~K ' ~ a • f ~ ' s3 ~ r 4 ~ Zia ' ~+~ ~% as ~ ~ ~ ~ Pic C/ 1Flr SA4 COWL ,`; ~ y 6 a ~ / \ ~ "- 39 ~ ~ q` afA ~ ~,. 47 ' ' ~ !t~ ~a se v ~ ~ ~ ' ~ _ as / N / 322 ~ - % ~ ~ ~ ~ - _ • / ii!! . . -. ~~. ~ AOMdfUNJTYSBRVICeS ANDDBVBLOPMBNT BRAMBLETON STORAGE CORPORATION B-2 TO M-1 (PARCEL 52) AMEND CONDITIONS (pARrFT. 57.11 ~- i~~~ "~~ Date Rec.: li-2 -~Q ' Received By: Case No.: Ord. No.: ROANOI~ COUNTY REZONING APPLICATION t'i a,Ce~vd S 55rS vE~'~ I t'Z`i-~ 1. Owner's Name: Professional Services Industries, Inc. phone: 404 642-4994 Address: 10933 Crabapple Rd. Suite 104 Roswell, Georgia 30075 2. Applicant's Name: Tnmmy Huhbard, .k_ Phone: 344-8888 Address:1~~ ~rankl i n tt _ Rncky Mn~nt, Va _ 24151 - 3. Location of Property: 4920 Cove Rd. N. W. Roanoke, Va. Tax Kap Number(s) : 31.17-01-05 4. Magisterial District: Catawba 5. Size of Property: .68 acre 6. Existing Zoning: 6-2 Existing Land Use: Proposed Zoning: LM-1 Proposed Land Use: 8. Comprehensive Plan Designation: 9. Are Conditions Proffered With i'his Request? Yes X No (If you are voluntarily offering proffers as apart of your appl.ica- t~on, these proffers must be 3m ~rr~t~ng. A member of the Planning Staff can assist you ~n the preparation of these proffers. 10. Value of Land and (Proposed) Bnildfngs:_~118,500.00 11. The Following Items Must Be Snb~itted With This Application. Please C,heclic If Enclosed. Application pill Not Be Accepted If Any Of These Items Are Kissing Or Incomplete: Letter of Application Concept Plan lsetes and Bounds Description List of Adjacent Owners of Property (Attach Exhibit A) Vicinity Map Application Fee_ - _______. Written Proffers water and Sewer e~ppiication~ (If Applicable) Signature Of Property Owner, Contract Purchaser, Or Owner's Aq nt: signature Date ~~- 2 ~ ~9 TOMMY HUBBARD, JR. 125 Franklin Street Rocky Mount, Virginia 24151 November 27, 1989 County of Roanoke Department of Planning & Zoning 37 38 Brambleton Avenue, S. W. Roanoke, Virginia 24018 Re: Rezoning of 4920 Cove Road, N. W. Tax # 37.17-O1-OS Gentlemen: I hereby submit the attached application for rezoning the property known as 4920 Cove Road, N. W., Tax # 37.17-01-05 near Peters Creek Road. This property is owned by Professional Service Industries, Inc. The building on subject property is currently vacant and is zoned B-2. It was formerly occupied by the owner and used as a test laboratory of soils, concrete, etc. The visual effect of the property is now rather poor since it has been vacant for sometime and is generally unkept. The proposed rezoning is LM to permit the operation of offices and storerooms, as well as inside storage of materials used in the installation of heating and air conditioning systems and guttering. In some instances some light fabrication of ducts would be necessary. Very truly yours, Tommy Hubbar , Jr. 1- PROFFERS 4920 Cove Road, N. W. Roanoke, Virginia The applicant agrees to the following voluntary proffers: 1. No outside storage of materials. - 2. Cosmetic improvements to the exterior of the building. 3. Plant new shrubs in front of the building. G ~~~ ~©~ ~ ~~~~~ ~~J~~ PQ`p~~S ~ ~C. ~ • `~ M ~~ o~ ~6 ~r 0 r V . k A,i ~ y ...° iltt .. . ~~ ~N~ ~~~ f ~~ ~ . I- ~~'b. USED CAR LOT ~. t- ~4., . SfR~ICE STA t IDN . ~~ OVE •~ ~ 1 ~= 1 1 ~ ~ 1 ... 1 1 ~ ~ 1 1 ~ ~ 1 ~~ v~ ~ ~ i CEN~~~ j ~ ~ 1 1NG .1 ~ . S~DQ? 5 1 ~' , q 1 1 ~ i 1 ! airtr 1 : ~ 1 ss~ 1 i ~A' 1 ~ .i ~~ 1 1 ~ ~C _ 1 l i p 1 ~ 1 1 ~ i 1 _ ~~~- 1 l ~. ~ 1 - ~ 1 1 1 _~ ~ ~`~~ NORTB • ~ ~ _ ~ ~ ~~ / P/O 37t3-~-~ ~ ~~ / ,/ I • f i ~ i /~ / 1 i 5 _ e ~ s. 8 % 6'-~ ~, i60~c ~ ~~' r ~ / ~ 71 :O/~ ~ / r ^ ~ '/i z ~Nllt - ~ ~~~kr S, O I i q~ ~i ~~ ~ ~ ~` ~- ~ ~\ ~ ~~ ` ~~ i • ~- ~ PROFESSIONAL SERVICES INDUSTRIES INC. c011lMUNl7Y sBRVICBS s-z TO M-1 AND DBVBLOPMBNT ACTION NUMBER ITEM NUMBER 6 " AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: December 19, 1989 SUBJECT: Appointments to Committees, Commissions and Boards COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Community Corrections Resources Board One-year term of Edmund J. Kielty, Alternate. His term expired August 13, 1988. Health Department Board of Directors Two-year term of Susan Adcock expired November 26, 1989 Landfill Citizens Advisory Committee Carl L. Wright, representative from the Cave Spring Magisterial District has resigned and another representative should be appointed. Library Board Four-year term of Dr. Norma Jean Peters, Hollins Magisterial District, will expire December 31, 1989. Dr. Peters is filling the unexpired term of Richard Kirkwood. Mental Health Services of the Roanoke Valley, Community Services Board Three-year term of Nancy F. Canova will expire December 31, 1989. The Board of Directors has recommended the appointment of the Reverend Clay H. Turner (see attached letter). This appointment mmust be ratified by the five participating localities. Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission Three-year term of Alice Gillespie, Hollins Magisterial District expired June 30, 1989. K~ 9 Regional Partnership Site Advisory Committee Three-year term of Charles Saul will expire December 21, 1989. Roanoke County Resource Authority Initial terms of Lee Garrett, Bob L. Johnson and Harry C. Nickens will expire December 31, 1989. New terms will be four-year terms and will expire December 31, 1993. Transportation and Safety Commission Four-year unexpired term of May Johnson, Citizen-at-large. This vacancy is due to Mrs. Johnson's death. SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: _~. ,~ Mary H. Allen Elmer C. Hodge Clerk to the Board County Administrator ------------------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: Yes No Abs Denied ( ) Garrett Received ( ) Johnson Referred McGraw To• Nickens Robers NOV 29 1989 ~f 3 RoanokeTimes ~ World-News 201 West Campbell Avenue, P.O. Box 2491, Roanoke, Vrginis 2401 D-2491 Cerl L. Wright, CPK Troasurer (703) 981-3275 November 21, 1989 bir. Dick Robcrs Roanoke County Board of Supervisors P. O. Bog 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 Dear Mr. Robers: I regret to inform you that I will be unable to continue my participation on the Landfill Citizens Advisory Committee, due to other demands on my time. I appreciate the confidence you and the Roanoke County Board of Directors have shown in me and your willingness to incorporate the recommendations of the Citizens Advisory Committee in the Roanoke County Landfill Permit Conditions and Operating Policies. It was a pleasure working with you. I want to commend John Hubbard for his work and support in helping us develop our recommendations. We could not havc succeeded in our effort without his efforts. Terry Harrington also was a tremendous help. I feel that Roanoke County has a staff that we can be proud of. I will continue to monitor the progress of Roanoke County in the permitting process and I wish you every success in this effort. Sincerely, r Carl L. Wright cc: .John Hubbard ty`~, ~' ,M ,. December 8, 1989 ~`~ • Mr. Lee Garrett, Chairman Roanoke County Board of Supervisors P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24818 Dear Mr. Garrett: According to our records, Mrs. Nancy F. Canova's term of appointment to Mental Health Services of the Roanoke Valley Board of Directors as a member at-large will expire December 31, 1989. ch°~'~'°~ 19g9 Board of Directors' Daniel E. Karnes At the December 7 , ~-,~ech°.,,,,°~~ meeting a resolution was passed to recommend the Nancy F.Canova Rev. Clay H. Turner, 2108 Idt. Vernon Road, Roanoke, Virginia, for a three year term as a member at- Tre°surer Thelma L. Stephens large beginning January 1, 1990. Seaet°ry George R. Daniels, Jr. The by-laws of the Board require that members Executive Dnecror at-large be recommended by the Board to the f ive FreaPRoesse~,Jr.,Ph.D. participating localities. All five local governments must ratify the appointment. Your attention to this matter will be very much appreciated. Sincerely, ~~/G~~ i/ Fred P. Roessel, Jr., Ph. D. Executive Director FPRjr:cd c: Elmer C. Hodge Mary Allen Nancy F. Canova Clay H. Turner MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES OF THE ROANOKE VALLEY EXECUTIVE OFFICES, 301 Elm Avenue, S.W., Roanoke, Virginia 24016-4026 - (703) 345-9841 Serving the Counties of Botetourt and Roanoke and the Cities of Roanoke and Salem ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER ~ /~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: December 19, 1989 AGENDA ITEM: Appointments to the Court Service Unit Advisory Council/Youth and Family Services Advisory Board COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: On December 13, 1988, the Board of Supervisors voted to continue this Board and appoint new members. Michael Lazzuri, Director of Court Services has contacted the present members of the Court Service Unit Advisory Council/Youth and Family Services Advisory Board to determine whether they wished to continue serving. The following terms expired in 1988 or will expire in 1989. Appointments to this committee are not made by magisterial district; however, the magisterial district is listed for each member. Two-year term of James L. Trout, Vinton Magisterial District, will expire March 22, 1989. Mr. Trout has not responded to Mr. Lazzuri's letter. Two-year term of Ted R. Powell, Cave Spring Magisterial District, will expire March 22, 1989. Mr. Powell would like to be reappointed. Two-year term of Hoyt C. Rath, Vinton Magisterial District, will expire March 22, 1989. Mr. Rath does not wish to serve another term. Two-year term of Dr. Andrew Archer, Vinton Magisterial District expired March 22, 1988. Dr. Archer does not wish to be reappointed. In addition to the appointments listed above, it is necessary to appoint four youth members, one each from Cave Spring High School, Northside High School, Glenvar High School, William Byrd High School. Mr. Lazzuri recommends that these appointments run from September through September. Therefore, appointment made in yy ". .. ~- 1 1989 will expire September 1, 1989. Thereafter all terms will expire September 1, coinciding with the school year. SUBMITTED BY: ,7r1. L.Z.C._2~r~ Mary H. Allen Clerk to the Board APPROVED BY: Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ------------------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: Yes No Abs Denied ( ) Garrett Received ( ) Johnson Referred McGraw To• Nickens Robers L AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIR CENITER ON TUESDAY, DECEMBER 019T 1989INISTRATION RESOLUTION NO. 121989-15 APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM L -CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for December 19, 1989, designated as Item L -Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 9, inclusive, as follows: 1. Approval of Minutes - May 9, 1989. 2. Request for approval of Raffle Permit - Loyal Order of Moose Lodge No. 284. 3. Confirmation of Committee appointment - Industrial Development Authority. 4. Acceptance of Water and Sanitary Sewer facilities serving, Williamsburg Court and Nichols Estates, Section #4. 5. Request for acceptance of Legate Drive and Deputy Drive into the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System 6. Donation of storm drainage and sanitary sewer easement from Fralin & Waldron Inc., J. Henry Powers, Calvin W. Powers and P&W Partnership. 7. Donation of a water line easement from Insulation Systems Inc. of Virginia. g. Donation of a drainage easement from James S. Payne. 9. Donation of a drainage easement from Barry J. St. John and Diane 5t. John. 2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this resolution. On motion of Supervisor Nickens to approve with Item 2 removed, seconded by Supervisor McGraw, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisor Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None On motion of Supervisor Johnson to approve Item L-2, seconded by Supervisor Nickens, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisor Johnson, Robers, Nickens, Garrett NAYS; None ABSTAIN: Supervisor McGraw A COPY TESTE: Cc/ ~ / v a-~~~ Brenda J. H ton, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Cliff Craig, Director, Utilities Phillip Henry, Director, Engineering Paul Mahoney, County Attorney Y ~ L ~` / AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, DECEMBER 19, 1989 RESOLUTION NO. APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM L - CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for December 19, 1989, designated as Item L -Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 9, inclusive, as follows: 1. Approval of Minutes - May 9, 1989. 2. Request for approval of Raffle Permit - Loyal Order of Moose Lodge No. 284. 3. Confirmation of Committee appointment - Industrial Development Authority. 4. Acceptance of Water and Sanitary Sewer facilities serving, Williamsburg Court and Nichols Estates, Section #4. 5. Request for acceptance of Legate Drive and Deputy Drive into the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System 6. Donation of storm drainage and sanitary sewer easement from Fralin & Waldron Inc., J. Henry Powers, Calvin W. Powers and P&W Partnership. 7. Donation of a water line easement from Insulation Systems Inc. of Virginia. 8. Donation of a drainage easement from James S. Payne. 9. Donation of a drainage easement from Barry J. St. John and Diane St. John. ' L ~- 9 2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this resolution. L-/ 773 May 9, 1989 Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Roanoke County Administration Center 3738 Brambleton Avenue, SW Roanoke, Virginia 24018 May 9, 1989 The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, met this day at the Roanoke County Administration Center, this being the second Tuesday, and the first regularly scheduled meeting of the month of May, 1989. IN RE: CALL TO ORDER Chairman Garrett called the meeting to order at 3:05 p.m. The roll call was taken. MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Lee Garrett, Vice Chairman Richard Robers, Supervisors Bob L. Johnson, Harry C. Nickens (arrived at 3:07 p.m.) MEMBERS ABSENT: Supervisor Steven A. McGraw STAFF PRESENT: Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator; John M. Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator for Human Services; John R. Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator of Community Services and Development; Don M. Myers, Assistant County Administrator for Management Services; Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney, Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk; Anne Marie Fedder, Information Officer >>5 May 9, 1989 Supervisor Garrett moved to adopt the resolution. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Nickens and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None ABSENT Supervisor McGraw RESO LIITION 5989-1 EXPRESSING THE APPRECIATION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY TO LETCHER R. MORRIS FOR 14 YEARS OF SERVICE TO ROANORE COUNTY WHEREAS, Letcher K. Morris was first employed on December 15, 1975, as a Social Worker in the Social Services Department; and WHEREAS, Letcher K. Morris has also served as Senior Social Worker. since November, 1982. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County expresses its deepest appreciation and the appreciation of the citizens of Roanoke County to LETCHER R. MORRIS for 14 years years of capable, loyal and dedicated service to Roanoke County. FURTHER, the Board of Supervisors does express its best wishes for a happy, restful and productive retirement. May 9, 1989 NAYS: None ABSENT Supervisor McGraw 777 5. Proclamation declaring the week of Mav 14 - 20. 1989 as Virginia Tourism Week. Mr. Phil Sparks was present to receive the proclamation. Supervisor Nickens moved to approve the proclamation. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Johnson and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None ABSENT Supervisor McGraw 6 Presentation on All-America City competition. County Administrator Elmer Hodge presented the plans for the All-America City Competition in Chicago and the Board members viewed a video highlighting the projects that will be presented at Chicago as part of the presentation. IN RE: WORK SESSION 1 Proposed Anti-cruise Ordinance Supervisor Johnson outlined the problems that the residents in the Boxley Hills neighborhood have experienced with 719 May 9, 1989 IN RE: NEW BUSINESS 1 Authorization to increase building permit fees A-5989-3 Director of Development and Inspections Arnold Covey presented the staff report. He advised that the current building permit fee was approved in 1974. He outlined the increases being requested. Mr. Covey anticipated increased revenue of between $65,000 and $85,000 annually if the fees were raised. Supervisor Nickens suggested that a brochure be prepared so that citizens are aware of the increased fees and what is necessary to obtain permits. Supervisor Nickens moved to authorize the increased building fees. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Garrett and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None ABSENT Supervisor McGraw 2 Rectuest to ratify Roanoke County Risk Management Program. A-5989-4 Director of Finance Diane Hyatt reported that when the Risk Management Program was approved, the Board requested that the activities, savings and benefits of the program be reviewed 781 May 9, 1989 Mr. Hodge presented the. staff report. There was no discussion. Supervisor Nickens moved to allocate $500 from the Board Contingency Fund. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Robers and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None ABSENT Supervisor McGraw IN RE; FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance authorizing the issuance of not to exceed 5470,000 bonds to finance the purchase of equipment for school purposes, and Ordinance repealing and rescinding ordinance 41189 10 which authorized the issuance of $440,000 General Obligation Bonds to finance the purchase of equipment for school purposes. There was no discussion on this item. No one was present to speak. Supervisor Johnson moved to approve first reading of the ordinance. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Nickens and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None ABSENT Supervisor McGraw 783 May 9, 1989 the school budget would revert back to the County capital fund rather than the school capital fund. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Robers. Mr. Hodge advised that this would be acceptable if the schools are not also responsible for any deficits incurred. The roll call was as follows: AYES: Supervisors Nickens, Robers NAYS: Supervisors Johnson, Garrett ABSENT: Supervisor McGraw Mr. Mahoney advised that a tie vote with a member absent carries the item over to the next meeting for another vote and the first reading would be at that meeting. Supervisor Johnson moved to reconsider the issue and his motion was ruled in order by the chairman. Mr. Mahoney advised that if the first reading passed with Supervisor Nickens amendment, any change at second reading would call for another reading in June. Supervisor Johnson withdrew his motion and moved to table the issue to May 23, 1989. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Garrett and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor McGraw IN RE: SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 785 May 9, 1989 was held on April 25, 1989; a second reading was held on May 9, 1989; and 3. That this real estate is more particularly des- cribed as Parcel 1, Part Tract 3, C. L. Bush Estate containing .98 acre and designated as Roanoke County Tax Map No. 61.14-4- 4.2; and 4. That the County donates the .98-acre tract of land to the Town of Vinton subject to the provisions and restrictions of the Land and Water Conservation Fund Act and in particular Section 6F; and 5. That the County hereby reserves a twenty (20) foot public water line easement across the .98-acre tract of land to access the adjacent well lot; and 6. That the donation of the property to the Town of Vinton is hereby authorized; and 7. That the County Administrator is authorized to exe- cute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County as are necessary to accomplish the conveyance of said pro- perty, all of which shall be upon form approved by the County Attorney. On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor Robers and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, Garrett, Nickens NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor McGraw 78 7 May 9, 1989 ing the sale and disposition of 1.4 acres, more or less, in the Southwest Industrial Park; and 3. That offers having been received for said property, the offer of Gorman Howell to purchase 1.4 acres, more or less, for $35,500 is hereby accepted and all other offers are rejected; and 4. That all proceeds from the sale of this real estate are to be allocated to the capital reserves of the County; and 5. That the County Administrator is authorized to exe- cute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County as are necessary to accomplish the conveyance of said pro- perty, all of which shall be upon form approved by the County Attorney. On motion of Supervisor Robers, seconded by Supervisor Nickens and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor McGraw 3. Ordinance authorizin the lease of 10.40 acres of real estate to John D. Willey. 0-5989-8 Mr. Mahoney presented the staff report. He presented a letter f or the record from Commonwealth Attorney Skip Burkart advising no potential conflict of interest. 789 May 9, 1989 4. That the County Administrator is authorized to exe- cute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County as are necessary to accomplish this transaction, all of which shall be upon a form approved by the County Attorney. On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor Robers and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor McGraw 4. Ordinance amending Article II, "Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code," of Cha pter 9 , "Fire Prevention and Protection," of the Roanoke County Code by the addition of Section F-318.1 "Cookin Devices on and under Balconies." 0-5989-9 Mr. Mahoney advised that the second reading was held over from the last meeting because of a substantial change in the ordinance. Supervisor Nickens moved to adopt the ordinance. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Robers and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None ABSENT Supervisor McGraw ORDINANCE 5989-9 AMENDING ARTICLE II, "VIRGINIA STATEWIDE FIRE PREVENTION CODE" May 9, 1989 791 F-318.1 Cookin Devices on or under Balconies No charcoal cooker. brazier. hibachi or grill. or any asoline or other flammable li id of li ified etroleum as- fired stove or similar device shall be i nited or used on or under the balconies of an a artment buildin or similar occu anc which are constructed of combustible materials. The mana ement of such occu ancies shall notif its tenants in writing of this code requirement at the time the tenant initially occupies the apartment and from time to time as necessary to ensure compliance. 2. The provisions of this ordinance shall be effective from and after May 10, 1989. On motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by Supervisor Robers and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor McGraw 5 Ordinance authorizinct petition of Old Heritage of a 50-foot ri ht-of-wa referred to as "North Mountain Drive" District. 0-5989-10 X93 May 9, 1989 1989; and the second reading of this ordinance was held on May 9, 1989. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That a portion of an unimproved fifty (50) foot right-of-way approximately 840 feet in length, identified as "North Mountain Drive," Section 5 of Southern Pines Subdivision- as recorded in Plat Book 2, page 138 in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court for the County of Roanoke, Virginia, be, and hereby _ is, vacated pursuant to Section 15.1-482 (b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended; and 2. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. 3. That petitioner shall record a certified copy of this ordinance with the Clerk of the Circuit Court and shall pay all fees required to accomplish this transaction. On motion of Supervisor Garrett, seconded by Supervisor Robers and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor McGraw 6. Ordinance authorizin etition of Ro Lochner to ~ ~. ~ May 9, 1989 WHEREAS, notice has been given as required by Section 15.1-431 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and a public hearing and first reading of this ordinance was held on April 25, 1989; and the second reading of this ordinance was held on May 9, 1989. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That a fifteen (15) foot public utility easement between Lots 3 and 4, Block 1, Section 1, Highfields Farms as recorded in Plat Book 9, page 348 in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court for the County of Roanoke, Virginia, be, and hereby is, vacated pursuant to Section 15.1-482 (b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended; and 2. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. 3. That petitioner shall record a certified copy of this ordinance with the Clerk of the Circuit Court and shall pay all fees required to accomplish this transaction. On motion of Supervisor Garrett, seconded by Supervisor Nickens and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor McGraw 797: May 9, 1989 and replacing nets and backboards at various County playgrounds; (3) Asked if funds remaining in the Park Bond money could be used for expansion and treatment of the Stonebridge Park parking lot; (4) Announced he was resigning as a member of the Consolidation Negotiations Committee. IN RE: APPOINTMENT TO CONSOLIDATION NEGOTIATIONS COMMITTEE Supervisor Nickens moved to to appoint Chairman Lee Garrett to the Consolidation Negotiations Committee to fill his vacancy. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Johnson and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor McGraw IN RE: CONSENT AGENDA Supervisor Johnson moved to approve the Consent Agenda with Item 7 removed. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Nickens and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None ABSENT Supervisor McGraw RESOLUTION N0. 5989-12 APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH May 9, 1989 79 9 2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this resolution. On motion of Supervisor Johnson with Item 7 removed for discussion and a separate vote, seconded by Supervisor Nickens, and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor McGraw Item 7 was denied by motion of Supervisor Robers, seconded by Supervisor Nickens and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Robers, Nickens NAYS: Supervisors Garrett ABSTAIN: Supervisor Johnson ABSENT: Supervisor McGraw RESOLUTION 5989-12.c SUPPORTING THE REQUEST OF CRAIG COUNTY TO BECOME A MEMBER OF THE MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES OF THE ROANOKE VALLEY BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia as follows: WHEREAS, Chapter 10 of Title 37.1 of the Code of Bpi May 9, 1989 AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None ABSENT:- Supervisor McGraw RESOLUTION 5989-12.a REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF HORSEPEN MOUNTAIN DRIVE AND HORSEPEN MOUNTAIN CIRCLE INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That this matter came this day to be heard upon the proceedings herein, and upon the application of Horsepen Mountain Drive from its intersection with Laurel Glen Road (Route 651) to the terminus at the cul-de-sac for a distance of 0.50 miles, and Horsepen Mountain Circle from Horsepen Mountain Drive to the terminus at the cul-de-sac for a distance of 0.05 miles to be accepted and made a part of the Secondary System of State Highways under Section 33.1-229 of the Virginia State Code. 2. That it appears to the Board that drainage easements and a fifty (50) foot right-of-way for said road have heretofore been dedicated by virtue of a certain map known as Falling Creek Estates, Section 6, which map was recorded in Plat Book 9, Page 316, of the records of the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, on March 12, 1985, and that by reason of the recordation of said map no report from a Board of Viewers, nor consent or donation of right-of-way from the abutting 803 May 9, 1989 2. That in accordance with Section 33.1-75.1 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, State matching allocation is available to improve, maintain, construct, or reconstruct State Highways within the County. 3. As an inducement to adopt this resolution, Old Heritage Corporation (Developer of Hunting Hills Subdivision) and the property owners of Chaucer's Court have agreed to pay to the County's General Fund the equivalent amount of the local share needed for the State's matching allocation and will deposit these funds with the Roanoke County Treasurer's Office within 30 days upon receiving notification that the Commonwealth Transportation Commission has approved State matching allocation for these two projects . 4. That, Roanoke County has presently. or will make available from County General Funds the local share of the drainage improvements on Givens Avenue upon receiving notification by the Commonwealth Transportation Commission of the approval of the State's matching allocation. 5. That, Roanoke County and the Virginia Department of Transportation improve roads in Huntings Hills Subdivision, and Chaucer's Court, and construct drainage improvements on and adjacent to Givens Avenue, and that funds be allocated for the local share of these projects and be available to the Virginia Department of Transportation at the appropriate time. 6. That, the Virginia Department of Transportation and the 80 5 May 9, 1989 and Recycling, and contingent on receipt of such funds for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1990; and 2. That the Board hereby authorizes Clean Valley Council, Inc., to plan and budget for a cooperative anti-litter program for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1990 which shall represent said program for all localities named in this resolution; and 3. That the Board further authorizes Clean Valley Council, Inc., to apply on behalf of Roanoke County for a grant, and to be responsible for the administration, implementation, and completion of the program; and 4. That the Board further accepts responsibility jointly with the Clean Valley Council, Inc., and the City of Roanoke, Town of Vinton, Botetourt County, and City of Salem for all phases of the program; and 807 May 9, 1989 developments and that the Highgate Apartments complied with all criteria in Comprehensive Plan and Subdivision and Zoning Ordinance while the Grouse Pointe Apartments complied with 23 of the 25 criteria. This proposal does not meet the density recommendations in the Comprehensive Plan. Staff recommends approval of the resolution. Supervisor Robers pointed out that the Board had denied rezoning requests with the same density. Mr. Harrington advised that the developers are not asking for a rezoning and already have the authority to build to that density. This items is only a request for support for the funding. Supervisor Robers moved to deny support for approval of the proposed multi-family residential housing developments known as the the Grouse Point Apartments and Highgate apartments. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Nickens and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Robers, Nickens NAYS: Supervisor Garrett ABSTAIN: Supervisor Johnson ABSENT: Supervisor McGraw IN RE: REPORTS Supervisor Johnson moved to receive and file the following reports. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Garrett and carried by the following recorded vote: May 9, 1989 IN RE: ADJOURNMENT 80 9 There being no Executive Session, Supervisor Johnson moved to adjourn at 6:00 p.m.. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Nickens and carried by the following voice vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor McGraw Lee Garrett, Chairman ACTION NO. A-121989-15.a ITEM NUMBER ~~° , AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: December 19, 1989 AGENDA ITEM: Request for approval of a Raffle Permit from the Loyal Order of Moose Lodge No. 284 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Loyal Order of Moose Lodge No. 284 has requested a Raffle Permit to be held on December 21, 1989. This application has been reviewed by the Commissioner of Revenue and he recommends that it be approved. The organization has paid the $25.00 fee. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the application for a Raffle Permit be approved. SUBMITTED BY: ~• Mary H. Allen Clerk to the Board APPROVED BY: •?iw~•-~ ''1 Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator -------------------- --------------------ACTION VOTE Yes No Abs A zroved ~ Motion by: Bob L. Johnson/Harry Garrett x p ~ ~ N; c-kPns Denied ( ) Johnson x Received ( ) Referred To: McGraw Nickens x Robers x Abst cc: File Bingo/Raffle File ~~ ~~~ rt 'i 7kJ rlrf , ',~ 4~. ~~. f, M r~, ~ h. ..r 't? ~~ ~ ~ tir.p T+".`'ne"" '~ , ,m r^ -~? 9CE VZFZCY`~7~ \\\ '; "' ~~ .~~ __ ,,, O~ °OR 1?FRMT'I' '?.'~ CO'~OCyCT RA~F~FS OR ~INGU Aor_+l ica* i on is hereby ms.de for a b~.Rao dame or raffle permit. , t n _~' !TS a.C~.E ~U`~"C'Ct ~Q ~~-~- CCallr,ty anc': ~r_a±-.e ~ aWS, Th ~ ~, ~pn_,:.ca:.a.o.. -_ . - _n force, ar tha+~ may be ox~ ,n,~rrPS, r~~.:'_es, and. r_ec~.~' ~.t' nnS now the unc?.er- .,nac,*eca hereasreY anc wh_~.c!~. are ?7er_e?~y agreed to by ~ ~ ~ nt ar.~, w`~ich ~;.na?'_ be ~eeme~. a con.<~itinn t~r~der. ~?.c~nec:. ~.ppy:~..a . w~`_C''? t~1i_r ?~e:C^.l:~t S LSSL?E'd. All applicants should exercise extreme ccruestionsureBingo games cy of t±,eir responses to the ow._ow_ng ~ sea. ~, ~„~ ra:f f ` eg are str ~ ct__y rRge.la*_:ed by Ti*_? e 18.2-34U.1 e... __r--°, ,: ~ f the Vir..ginia Code, and by S~cts.on a~: th<~= cr~.z~* ra_ ,ta _utes a. , Code. These laws authorise ~.-R 5 ~,,~ , ~ ea . c,, f t"ze Roanoke CoL.r.ty the Co°~.:?;y ~?3oard of SUIPerV1SO7_' a to coYdF~~ a ~rmst.~ab~.helgoarc'.~ has tt.on pr~.c:r to c~.ra.ntinc~ a "~i nao or a~.~'_e P,- *mor dens the n.T_xty c'..:~ys Frci*n t~,e Fi'.:'.ng of t^. n. appl'.cat?.on t:.o gram Th(a ?a,Qi'lr~~, fl?i~ C.E~ny'', ~>L`.S*Jt?'lC~., or ~'c?VO~Ce th!'- perm:.t O~ e?ny n~rm.t. - y e+-"~'1. CC)'~t'1*'y aP~ F et. , t to hf' ". n, SAY, 3_~'.t CC?R1L,? _c~l^iCe w._c._ ~~r(_'4[~.!Zt 22111 on G'-.,..`3(.. RQ.. - iz, ~'p.'Wc.. ~ r'°tW . ~°~y nPrsOn vM.o'_ating county or statQ regulations concer ex~on hw~o „~x'tR:_":3 sha)_~_ re cru i, ty of ~. C'_a~s ? m .sc'.emeanor_ . An} p F r ~ „ro:=,s .r_ec.e:_r~ts 4~r.om '~.ngo or ra~f_ `,_e~ f_ox and. '1Sf?S any r,?.rt r~,; t,l~"> ~ t r 1 j LQLI~ /"~aY~t1b'_E', ~COS?tY?'L?flJ.t'~, R.t ~ r-~' O S ~' Q i. +~e f., • t i12+. n '-. ~"l E' ~ %a, lh' . ~ L _ '~?' ._ . ~ . ~ r n ~ 5 C T~ ~ Q j ~" ~ ... c~6; f:oY •,~h, c„h, * :.,e or a~a ~ a.a _ ~-on ~ .. ',:O!:' t'ec"?cOTlr3.~l"' Ql~er~} LT1C? e'+:t~EanSeS, sha. ,~ mglg ,~1iD'~'`,T_C~'~T?ON IS ~'nR: (check one ~':~F?~'r~~ DG~M Tm g 3T!~iGC rA,*a'~S -Vamt~ o¢ Or~~RJ.zati on_„ Lo al Order of Moose Lod e No. 284 ~~'~'~ Catawba Valley Drive Salem, Virg*iuia 24153 Ma ' ~.ng Ac'.~.regs P. O. Box 538, ~ _ ~Q ~ ao CodP Salem, Virginia 24153 C_~ty, a _ _ ~ Fraternal Organization ~~,rnose anc? ^,_'ype of Organization Tn'hez~ was «-he oraa^ ization founc'e~.? )~ - ~-~ Roanoke Cou.rty mee*_inq p;_ace? Yes -Moose Home - 3233 Catawba Valley Dri~~e, Salem Baas oraanizat.~on been in existence in Roanoke County far two con- e i_ i, c"4 r S ? Y ^. S,____X___-- '.~dO ~.n ~.o~ s ye ~s rb,e orgZn~.zation non.-p,-of_t? YES X _ NO Tnd.icate Fec° era'_ Zden*_' f icat ion ''umber ~~ 54-0_287492 l1'tt~C~l CODy Of T_RS Tax G;~F±m.~t iOn :.r't* f'r . Officers of the Orc~~~n:.za.tion: Norman S. Pleasanton Nice-nr~~=si_ r~ent Clarence E. Davidson nres~.c?,Pn.t: 2407 Laura Road P1W Address : 1759 Pomeroy P.oad F1c'.c'ress Roanoke, Va. 24017 Salem Va. 24153 Administrator Whittemore Paul J Treasurer: John E Wade . 7104 Woods Crossing Drive SW Address: s P. o. i~ox ..38 Address . ' Salem, Va. 24153 Roanoke Va. 24014 responsible for_ Raff_1e or ~3ingo opera- b ` e !!ember ,~utlZOrized to ~~zne Jack W. Mullins reSS 5160 Hollyhock Road u L? AC' PZW Roanoke, Va. 24012 omP . . Phane 366-7351 Bus.~Pbone - rm F TS?r ~lA'~!F'S AND ADDRESSES OF CUR2FNT MEMBER- r T p !~ m I~ C'C~,Q r,,~F .. .., .~..., h ~ rtT'rr~~~ r*~~.7T~~y ~.~F ~xC~TiC'~~. where Raffle at~ o^ i or. Ringo GC~me as to be•conducted. . ~ oc ~ iFic .r~ec - 3233 Catawba Valley Drive, Salem, Va. 24153 (P.t. 311 Pdortti Moose Home Dec. 21, 1989 Time of prawing_ PM rArgrES: gate of ^rawing ~r~GO: lays of Wee! & ??ours of Activity: From Su!^.dz.y To - ~~.v From t?~onC TO.._--- . ~?XOP1 T~ZA~C.ay mO TO _ a n.O~„ - ' .. O M,~ ~ r C.n _______~_. 2 ~^ State s_eciFica~'y how the r~roceeds a At st in. ~'.E>taz'_ the use of r'"ie t'~~ pror_.ee~s . "~~ Est imatec; amo~.~ts From the Bzngo/RafF.?c~ wi]L1 ~~ o."~fll'1('f~ or_ intenc~.ec~ use of For the Drug Awareness Prograr:~ fcr. Tlooseheart. ~-a BINGO: Complete the following: Legal owner(s) of the building where BINGO is to be conducted: Name: Loyal Order of Moose Lodge tdo. 2~4 Address: P. 0. Box 535, Saler~i, Va. 24153 Roanoke State Va. Zip 24153 County -- Is the building owned by a 501-C non-profit organization? Yes for each location: 700 Seating capacity 700 Parking spaces for each location: - 19 ALL RAFFLE AND BINGO APPLICANTS MUST ANSWER QUESTIONS 1 1. Gross receipts from all sbu alendarlquar eroforeprior calenf Bingo games or Instant Bingo by c dar year period. INSTANT BINGO BINGO 1st Quarter 2nd Quarter 1st Quarter 2nd Quarter • 3rd Quarter 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter 4th Quarter Total Total 2. Does your organization understand erson orsfirm,o aassociaf law to enter into a contract wi or corporation of any classifica- tion, organization, partnership, or con- tion whatsoever, for the purpose of organizing, managing, ducting Bingo Games or Raffles? Yes 3. Does your organization understand that it must maintain ado file complete records of reand thatdsuchbrecordssarersubject to Bingo games and Raffles, audit by the Commissioner of the Revenue? Yes 4. Does your organization and he ranhttto go uponothespremises the Revenue or his designee has t g ame or raffle, on which any nnouncedtaudits,candutolsecurelforgaudit all re- to perform una cords required to be maintained for Bingo games or raffles. Yes 4 5, Does your organization sionertofdtheaRevenueaonlor before must be filed with the Commis the first day of November of each calendar year for which a per mit has been issued? Yes Does your organization understand tlendar quartereC a n addi- 6. Geed fifty thousand dollars during any ca tional Financial Report mhe tlast dayeoffsuchuquagter?erY o later than sixty days following t ~, Does your organization hallrcause automaticfrevocationlof financial reports when due s Bingo game the permit, aeafteruuntilgsuch reportais properlynfiled and a or raffle they new permit is obtained? Yes g, Does your organizationtificateanderified cunderaoath by pthe must be accompanied by a Cer Bingo game or raffle Board of Directors, that the proceeds of any have been used for thesurloseslfor whichothe organization i ospe- nity, or educational p p cifically chartered or orgenl ind~accordancetwithpthetp~ovisionsnof games or raffles have be Article 1.1 of Chapter 8, Title 18.2 of the Code of Virginia? 9, Does your organization undersaaadtohtheaCountyeof Roanoke fee of the gross receipts must b p upon submission of the annual financial report due on or before the first of November? Yes 10. Does your organization unnd o lanattsuchtlocationst and afor only in the County of Roanoke a Y such dates, as are designated in the permit application? YEs 11. Does your organization understand that no person, except a bona fide member of any such organization who shall haverbornto member of such organization for at least ninety days p era- such participation, sfa an pabingopgamelortraffleagandnno person tion, or conduct o Y shall receive any remuneration for participating in managemen , operation, or conduct of any such game or raffle? Yes 12, Has your organization attaac able toe t e Countyaof Roanoket fee in the amount of $25.00 p Y Virginia? Yes 13 . Does your organization unders nddRaf f le Ordinancea o ~ §18u2a in violation of the County Bingo a 340.10 of the Code of Virginia authorizing this permit is subject to having such permit revoked and any person, shareholder, agent, member or employee of such organizatierson~ shareholder a agen t having such permit revoked and any p member or employee of such orogf a felony? who Y solates the above referenced Codes may be guilty 5 ~". 14. Has your organization attached a complete ship to this application form? On File list of its member- of its bylaws to this 15. Has your organization attached a application form? ~>,~ -~-• ~p 16. Has the organization been declared tion under the Virginia Constitution or If yes, state whether exemption is for or both and identify exempt property.- 3233 Catawba Valley D copy exempt from property taxa- statutes? Yes real, personal property, Real Estate rive Salerl Va. 17. State the specific type and purpose of the organization. Fraternal - i1on-- rofit - Charit ble lg. Is this organiddress ofcRegisteredlAgentglnia? Yes If yes, name and a Paul J. Whittemore p,0, Box 538 Salem, Va. 24153 19. Is the organization regAffairs pursuant Vtogthea Charit ble of Agriculture and Consumer Solicitations Acto- Softregistration,)he Virginia Code? rao ( If so, attach c py Has the organization been granted an exemption from registration by the Virginia Department oof A of exemption nd Consumer Affairs? No (If so, attach c py ALL RAFFLE APPLICANTS DESCRIBE VALUE OF SUCH ARTICLES, AND PROCEED Article Description Bowling Ball & Bag THE ARTICLES TO BE RAFFLED, TO NOTARIZATION. Fair Market Value X100.00 6 ~"' ~, ALL BINGO APPLICANTS MUST ANSWER QUESTIONS 20 - 27 BEFORE NOTARIZATION RAFFLE APPLICANTS, GO TO NOTARIZATION. 20. Does your organization n der Chad two c hlendarodays sinhany not be conducted more freque y calendar week? 21. Does your organization uonda~etaThesearecords basedr on §18e2p complete records of the b g g 340.6 of the Code of Virginia and §4.98 of Roanoke County Code must include the following: a. A record of the date, quantity, and card value of instant bingo supplies purchased, as well as the naliesndanddwritten the supplier of such instant bingo supp invoice or receipt is also required for each purchase of in- stant bingo supplies? b. A record in writing of the dates on which Bingo is playea, the number of people in attendance on each date, and the amountrecordscmustt be retained forothree years? ) (These c, A record of the nameoTns ecialsBingoa game prizea or jackpot door prize, regular p from the playing of Bingo is awarded? d. A complete and itemized record oeeawithc thesquarter yrand ments which support, and that ag annual reports require asonable o der~tonpermit audit?records must be maintained in re 22. Does your organization understand that instant Bingo may only be conducted at h locations and uatasuchntimes as arelspec f ed in and only at suc this application? 23. Does your organization understand that the of°instant pBingo the course of a reporting year from the playing may not exceed 33 1/3$ of the gross receipts of an organization's Bingo operation? 24. Does your organization understand it may not sell an instant Bingo card to an individual below sixteen years of age? 25. Does your organizatinnouod erationshth t exceedzorloarehexe gross receipts from all b g p calendar year shall have been. pected to exceed $75,000 in any granted tax-exempt status pursuant to Section 501 C of the United States Internal Revenue Service. (Certificate must be attached.) 7 "' 26. Does your organiaato~obeuonefilenwhichtauthorizesc this use cat pancy must be obtaine the proposed location? 27, Does your organizainoexcess ofnthehfollowingoamounts Dare or merchandise valued illegal? a. No door prize shall exceed twenty-five dollars. b. No regular Bingo or special Bingo game shall exceed One Hund- red dollars. c. No jackpot of any nature whatsoever shall exceed One Thousand Dollars, nor shall the toxceedmOnetThousandpDolparseS awarded in any one calendar day e * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * NOTARIZATION: THE APPLICANTS OATH MUST BE TAKEN BY ALL I hereby swear or affirm under the penalties of perjury as set forth in §18. 2 of the Cheebest of mynknowl dge a information band statements are true to t beliefs. All questions have been answered. Signed by: Administrat Title P 0 Box 538, Salem, Va. 2415; Home Address day of l9 Subscribed and sworn before me, this My commission expires: 19 Notary Public RETURN THIS COMPLETED APPLICATION T0: COMMISSIONER OF THE REVENUE p,O. Box 20409 Roanoke, VA 24018-0513 8 NOT VALID UNLESS COUNTERSIGNED having been found in due form, is approved The above application, and issued to the applicant to have effect until December 31st of this .calendar year. -~.-~. l ~ ~"Z `~ ~ ~ ~ Commissi ner of the evenue Date The above application is not approved. Date Commissioner of the Revenue 9 ACTION # A-121989-15.b ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR ~~ AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY UADMINISTRATIONRCENTER COUNTY, VIRGINI MEETING DATE December 19, 1989 SUBJECT: Confirmation of Committee Appointments to the Industrial Development Authority COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The followia of Su nervisorsas Thennominee has agreed t e serveirmed by the Boar p Industrial Development Authority Supervisor Nickens has advised that W. Darnall Vinyard has agreed to serve another four-year term. His term will expire September 26, 1993. SUBMITTED BY: Mary H. Allen Clerk to the Board APPROVED BY: Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ----------------------- --------------------ACTION VOTE Harry C. Nickens/ _ Yes No Abs Approved (x) Motion by: Garrett x Denied ( ) Steven A. McGraw Johnson x Received ( ) McGraw x Referred Nickens x To: Robers x cc: File Industrial Development Authority File ACTION # A-121989-15.c ITEM NUMBER AT A REGGLARA HELDNAT THEHROANOKE COUNTYEADMINISTRp,TIONOCENTER COUNTY, VIR MEETING DATE: December 19, 1989 SUBJECT: Acceptance of Water and Sanitary Sewer Facilities Serving Williamsburg Court and Nichols Estate, Section 4. COUNTY A,D/'MINISTRATOR' S COMME~N`TS SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Developers of Williamsburg Court and Nichols Estate, Section 4, Roanoke Land Development Corporation, thee wat reSand that Roanoke County accept the Deed conveying sanitary sewer facilities serving the subdivision along with all necessary easements. The water and sewer facilities are installed, as shown on plans prepared by T. P. Parker and Son entitled Williamsburg Court, dated March 17, 1988, which are on file in the County Engineering Department. The w ti nsaand sthe plans approved by theoCountytion meets the specifica FISCAL IMPACT' The value of the water and sanitary sewer construction is $30,000.00 and $60,000.00 respectively. RECOMMENDATION' Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors accept the water and sanitary sewer facilities serving the subdivisions along with all necess executeSeaenDeed for the h transferh of Cthese Administrator to facilities. L- SUBMITTED BY: Clifford r ig .E. Utility Dir or ACTION VOTE Approved (~ Motion by: Harry C Nickens/ No Denied ( ) Steven A McGraw _ Garrett Received ( ) Johnson _ Referred McGraw to Nickens Robers APPROVED: 7 ~+ 0-t/ ~? Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator cc: File Cliff Craig, Director, Utilities Phillip Henry, Director, Engineering Paul Mahoney, County Attorney Yes Abs _~ -~ ~~ x ~.' AT THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGTER ON TUESDAYTHDECEMBERE19OU1989ADMINISTRATION CEN RESOLUTION 121898-15.d REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF LEGATE DRIVE AND DEPUTY DRIVE INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That this matter came this day to be heard upon the proceedings herein, and upon the application of Legate Drive and Deputy Drive to be accepted and made a part of the Secondary System of State Highways under Section 33.1-229 of the Virginia State Code. 2. That it appears to the Board that drainage easements and a fifty (50) foot right-of-way for said road have heretofore been dedicated by virtue of a certain map known as Montclair Estates, Section 8, which map was recorded in Plat Book 10, Page 17, of the records of the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, on July 17, 1986 and that by reason of the recordation of said map no report from a Board of Viewers, nor consent or donation of right-of-way from the abutting property owners is necessary. The Board hereby guarantees said right-of- way for drainage. 3. That said roads known as Legate Drive and Deputy Drive and which are shown on a certain sketch accompanying this Resolution, be, and the same are hereby established as public roads to become a part of the State Secondary System of Highways in Roanoke County, only from and after notification of official acceptance of said street or highway by the Virginia Department of Transportation. On motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by Supervisor McGraw, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisor Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Brenda J. olton, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Phillip Henry, Director, Engineering Arnold Covey, Director, Development & Inspections, and copy for Virginia Department of Transportation . 1 ITEM NUMBER L AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE HOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: December 19, 1989 SUBJECT: Acceptance of Legate Drive and Deputy Drive into the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Merrill Construction Co., Inc., the developer of Montclair Estates, Section 8, requests that the Board of Supervisors approve a resolution to the Virginia Department of Transportation requesting that they accept 0.11 miles of Legate Drive and 0.06 miles of Deputy Drive. The staff has inspected this road along with representatives of the Virginia Department of Transportation and find the road is acceptable. FISCAL IMPACT No county funding is required. RECOMMENDATIONS The staff recommends that the Board approve a resolution to the VDOT requesting that they accept Legate Drive and Deputy Drive into the Secondary Road System. SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED: ~~j~ -Vi`i' Elmer C. Hodge chilli T. Henr E. Director of Engineering County Administrator ------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE ~r~, v..~. nha Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Motion by: Garrett Johnson L -5 NORTB ~3~ is c /~ _ Se _ _ ~~ r ~ l n .~~ ~ . , PROPOSED ADDITION SHOWN IN GRAY DESCRIPTION: 1) Legate Drive from the intersection of Emissary Drive (Route 1708) to cul-de-sac. 2) Deputy Drive from the Intersection of Legate Drive to cul-de-sa c. LENGTH: (1) 0. 11 Miles (2) 0.06 Miles RIGHT OF WAY: (1) 50 Feet (2) 50 Feet ROADWAY WIDTH: (1) 31 Feet (2) 31 Feet SURFACE WIDTH: (1) 26 Feet (2) 26 Feet SERVICE: (1) 5 Homes (2) 3 Homes IMPROVEMENTS NECESSARY: None 1 COMMUNITY SERVICES ACCEPTANCE OF LEGATE DRIVE AND DEPUTY DRIVE INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY ANDDBVELOPMENT SYSTEM. ~~ _ 2 \. ~\ w ~~ n, AT THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, DECEMBER 19, 1989 RESOLUTION REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF LEGATE DRIVE AND DEPUTY DRIVE INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That this matter came this day to be heard upon the proceedings herein, and upon the application of Legate Drive and Deputy Drive to be accepted and made a part of the Secondary System of State Highways under Section 33.1-229 of the Virginia State Code. 2. That it appears to the Board that drainage easements and a fifty (50) foot right-of-way for said road have heretofore been dedicated by virtue of a certain map known as Montclair Estates, Section 8, which map was recorded in Plat Book 10, Page 17, of the records of the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, on July 17, 1986 and that by reason of the recordation of said map no report from a Board of Viewers, nor consent or donation of right-of-way from the abutting property owners is necessary. The Board hereby guarantees said right-of-way for drainage. 3. That said roads known as Legate Drive and Deputy Drive and which are shown on a certain sketch accompanying this 3 y ~ .. Resolution, be, and the same are hereby established as public roads to become a part of the State Secondary System of Highways in Roanoke County, only from and after notification of official acceptance of said street or highway by the Virginia Department of Transportation. 4 ACTION NO. A-121989-15.e ITEM NO. L"' `F' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: December 19, 1989 AGENDA ITEM: Donation of a storm drainage and sanitary sewer easement from Fralin & Waldron Inc., J. Henry Powers, Calvin W. Powers, and P & W Partnership to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: This consent agenda item involves the donation of a storm drainage and sanitary sewer easement from Fralin & Waldron Inc., J. Henry Powers, Calvin W. Powers, and P & W Partnership to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors through real estate designated as Tax Parcel Nos. 39.20-1-51 and 39.20-1-40 through 44 and shown on a plat entitled "New Sanitary Sewer Easements" dated October 10, 1989, prepared by Lumsden Associates, P.C., C.L.S. The location and dimensions of this donated easement have been reviewed and approved by the County's engineering staff. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends acceptance of this storm drainage and sanitary sewer easement. Respectfully submitted, Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney Action Approved (x) Motion by Harry C. Nickens/ Garrett Denied ( ) Steven A. McGraw Johnson Received ( ) McGraw Referred Nickens to Robers cc: File Paul Mahoney, County Attorney Phillip Henry, Director, Engineering Cliff Craig, Director, Utilities Vote No Yes Abs x x x x x_ A-121989-15.f ACTION NO. ITEM NO. L AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: December 19, 1989 AGENDA ITEM: Donation of a water line easement from Insulation Systems Inc. of Virginia to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: This consent agenda item involves the donation of a water line easement from Insulation Systems Inc. of Virginia to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors. The easement is located on Tract III- B-1 which is located in the Southwest Industrial Park, Cave Spring Magisterial District, and is shown on a plat for Insulation Systems Inc. dated November 30, 1989, made by Robert S. Lang, Land Sur- veyor. The location and dimensions of this donated easement have been reviewed and approved by the County's engineering staff. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends acceptance of this water line easement. Respectfully submitted, Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney ' ~' Action Vote No Yes Abs Approved ( ~ Motion by Harrv~_Ni r-kPn~ Garrett x Denied ( ) ~; o~7on a MnC'ra~~ Johnson x Received ( ) McGraw x Referred Nickens x to Robers x cc: File Paul Mahoney, County Attorney Phillip Henry, Director, Engineering Cliff Craig, Director, Utilities ACTION NO. A-1219'89-15.g ITEM NO. ~' u AT A VIRGINI ,HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER COUNTY, MEETING DATE: December 19, 1989 AGENDA ITEM: ton the nBoard doff Supervisorst f oRoanoke SCountye Virginia COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND' SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: This consent agenda item involves the donation of a twenty (20) foot drainage easement from James S. Payne (Deed Book 1163, page 355) to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, across the southwestern portion of Lot 6, Block 3, Bali Ha'i Estatesviewed and approveddbyetheoCounty'slengineerding staff have been re STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends acceptance of this drainage easement. Respectfully submitted, Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney Action Vote No Yes Abs Approved (~ Motion by uarr ~ n~~CkPnG/ Garrett X Denied ( ) Johnson x Received ( ) McGraw x Referred Nickens x Robers X to cc: File Paul Mahoney, County Attorney Phillip Henry, Director, Engineering Cliff Craig, Director, Utilities ACTION NO. A-121989-15.h ITEM NO. ~ ` AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: December 19, 1989 AGENDA ITEM: Donation of a drainage easement from Barry J. St. John and Diane St. John to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND' SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: This consent agenda item involves the donation of a twenty (20) foot drainage easement from Barry J. St. John and Diane St. John (Deed Book 1164, page 355) to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as shown on a plat showing "New 20' Drainage Easement" dated 14 November 1989 prepared by Buford T. Lumsden & Associates, P.C. The location and dimensions of this donated easement have been reviewed and approved by the County's engineering staff. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends acceptance of this drainage easement. Respectfully submitted, Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney Action Approved ~ ) Motion by ua~.~.~LiClr.~ensl Garrett Denied ( ) ~t-P~~Pn A MC ,r~~ Johnson Received ( ) McGraw Referred Nickens Robers 1- n cc: File Paul Mahoney, County Attorney Phillip Henry, Director, Engineering Cliff Craig, Director, Utilities Vote No Yes Abs x x x X ~iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiniiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii~ _ - _ - _ - _ - VEST APPEARANCE RE Q = _ - _ - _ - _ - _ ~ - AGENDA ITEM NO. ~ SUBJECT_~ ~~ _ _ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supex~tisors to reco nize me during the public hearing on the above matter g N CALLED TO THE PODIUM, __ so that I may comment.WHE FOR THE I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS - RECOI~D. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES - LISTED BELOW. • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will - c _ decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. _ _ • S eskers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Ques- pp ons of cl ' 'cation may be entertained by the Chairman. t _ = _ • All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. _ = _ • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. __ c • Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. • INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED = _ GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT ' c THEM. __ PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO DEPUTY CLERK _ _' NAME ~~, ~~~f~~ ~;~ ~~'~, ~ ~'~ ~L , __ ~- ,~~ ~~ ~ '~ ADDRESS ~~L~~~~ c~~•-~~<~ PHONE ,~~~/-~/ y~-`1- y~ ~/ m~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ACTION N0. ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: December 19, 1989 AGENDA ITEM: Valley Metro Routes in Roanoke County COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR' S COMMENTS : ~~ ~~,~i~~ .~ •i~~yt~t, ~,1 p ~ / ~ BACKGROUND• ~- =2:/~ rrvt . On April 25, 1989, the Board of Supervisors considered the proposal from the Greater Roanoke Transit Company (Valley Metro) as it related to the projected subsidy to be required for the three routes then being used within the County of Roanoke. These routes included the service to Tanglewood Mall, Brambleton Avenue and Edinburgh Square. Valley Metro's proposal was to standardize service on each of its routes, so as to provide twenty trips per day on a thirty minute schedule, with elimination of any zone charges being added to its regular fare. Based upon the ridership data available at that time, it was projected that the Tanglewood Mall route would generate a profit of approximately $6,700, the Edinburgh Square route would have a cost of approximately $3,000 and the Brambleton Avenue route would have a cost of approximately $30,000. At that time, ridership was greatly reduced from its peak month of March, 1988, and the average cost per passenger on the Brambleton Avenue route (being subsidized by the County) was $4.14. Using Valley Metro's projected cost for the new service and based upon the ridership history along the Brambleton Avenue route, the projected subsidy for the new service required from the County was $30,181.74, representing an average cost per passenger of $15.99. The impact of this cost increase was discussed with the Brambleton Avenue Merchants Association, who indicated that the bus service along Brambleton Avenue had not made significant increases in the shopping traffic to their business, and likewise, could not offer a cost justification for the continuation of this service. Valley Metro had intended to make the changes in its proposed routes as soon as practical after July 1, 1989 and even considered alternatives for the benefit of Roanoke County, which might have allowed bus service along some additional portions of Brambleton Avenue. However, with a lack of turn around area, no alternative was found which could be considered cost justifiable to the County. The new route schedule was implemented by Valley Metro on November 6, 1989, and appears to be working satisfactorily on the Tanglewood Mall and Edinburgh Square routes (the two remaining routes in Roanoke County). N-1 It is regrettable that persons are somet howevercogovernmendt with the loss of a particular public service, should provide stewardssafet vandtwelfarelof is cons t tuents and provide for the health, Y provide these services in a cost effective and efficroviditnnnthe In this instance, vice f along s Brambletone Avenue f was not gcost proposed bus ser justified and supports ser ace at the Brambleton Avenuerroutes o April 25, 1989 to drop Attached are two tables e anal sish ofrtherproje ct d cost for Brambleton Avenue route and th Y the changed routes of Valley Metro for your review. ALTERNATIVES AND IMPACT: RECOMMENDATION: No action is requested. This report is subme tM rris ofp1602 to the citizen petition presen a d the November 15 meeting of the Salem Avenue, Roanoke VA 24016, Board of Supervisors. A copy of this data has been forwarded to the petitioner. Approv d by, Respectfully submitted, ~_'~'~. ~> //cv,~i'~,.,. .. Elmer C . odge f ohn M. Chamb~iss, Jr. County Administrator _ Assistant Administrator __ ______-- ------------ ------------- VOTE ------------------- ACTION No YeS Abs Approved ( ) Motion by: Garrett Denied ( ) Johnson Received ( ) McGraw Referred ( ) Nickens To ( ) Robers ~- / yi ~_~~~ jaw: j 1z:i ~ 't'~.~ij_`Y~: ~ E-F4i't"~G~_~ , to f i..1i_rj _. ~-i , , :, s,: ~`'J~=i~f";= F:;F9i; f ~«F vf'v~ ~' ~~,;~~, f"~t.....~u _.~'= ~ ( ~ 7 t . ] y ` ' ~ ~i . ~ ..~ C i i ~ ~r ~ 7 , I ~ ~ c. . ;_. ~ 1 r~ Liu ~.:i ~ ~~ rec. ~ -. -_. - ~ ~ u~ = 4'1 i 'mot yk , `t ' .. , ~~ ;~ ~ r ' w ~ ~ . . ( ~ I Tr ~ '~ ~ r . mil f ~ . ~' . : ~_ ~; 1~.. C~ "+% ~ ;~ %_ } X11 t j ~~. ~ E .. _ ~ ~..~ I C C ~ Z C ~ r 3 z ~ ^' ~ m m c m ~' ' ~ N chi O ~ i ~ m = p c -~ Z f7 A i m O c ~ 1 ~ O 1 I 0 m Z ' ~ ^' I z I m 1 1 C") I = tsr .si ' D Z ~9 N O I O V r ~'' ~ n rr7 N V I ~ 1 O N N W ~p r V W I W 1 ~ N p I W V 1 I bR 1 I 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ I 1 m C O r I Z O N CJI ~ V O 1 C 1 m O O O 1 O O O I I ~ I ~ 1 O 4A ~ r W ~ ~ m ~ 1 A T W i O ~ O W i -i --i N W A 1 ~ W O ~ V 1 1 I 1 ~ 1 ~ i w ~ W 1 O l .'O (n m c . - 1 A W 1 to I O V r I C N ~ 1 ~ m ~ V 1 W I N I T r ~ v l ~ O I N ~ ~ I 1 1 ~ I D z ~ I w c ~ I N 3 O ~, 1 m W v r ~ r i GZi A n i ~ ~ O m ~ p V I (n T D 1 1 ~ W p 1 N N CO I m --i m C ~ :~ v i r-i GZ'> O 7O ~ ~ W i ~ zD o m m ~ ~' V . 61 O I N r ~ r ~ 1 N-/ ACTION # ITEM NUMBER ~~ AT A REGULAR MEETINGT THEHROp,NORE COUNTYEADMINISTRATIONNCENTER COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD A MEETING DATE: December 19, 1989 AGENDA ITEM: Information Report on Economic Development Road Construction COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: -~ ~/~~ ~~ /~ s `~~~0 ~i}l ~(iMT~ ~ivf`/ G n~<1'Y7'vF'Yl;.~ ~/~3 'h,~~^~~w .g~~JJ~ , V j /, ~~ //,9UUU~-frR-~'~ SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: At the request of Mr. Johnson (September 12), the staff has evaluated the costs to have County employees coordinate and expedite the construction of access roads to existing or new industrial sites. With the addition of one staffe can copra pate the rdesignsand and construction, the County construction of proposed access roads o of moutsiden design efirmsf engineer would coordinate the hiring review and award bids, and coordinate the construction work. The funding of the construction and design c se be determ a e beael gibleefo r statenfundsaandbothers projects m y constructed with local funds. The cost of the additional position $50,000 annually plus capital costs for a would have to basis. Some may have to be would be approximately vehicle and equipment. Attached is additional information. SUBMITTED BY: ~~ ~ ~ ~ • ~ ~-~ Jf6hn R. ubbard, P.E. Assistant County Administrator Community Services & Development APPROVED: ,/~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator O `~ ~' ''~~.~. ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs Approved ( ) Motion by: Garrett Denied ( ) Johnson Received ( ) McGraw Referred Nickens to Robers ~-°~' MEMORANDUM TO: Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator FROM: Phillip T. Henry, Director of Engineering ~r~~ SUBJECT: BobuLstJohnsonrdConcerningiHiringmanrEngineer for Road Improvements DATE: October 26, 1989 Approximate six (6) weeks ago the Board of Supervisors considered the direction for future Economic Development Activities. The direction was preparation of future sites which could be ready when an industry was looking for a location. In relation to that discussion, Mr. Johnson, asked for information concerning the needs and abilities of Roanoke County to pursue Road Improvementsllowin einformationites. In response to this inquiry is the fo 9 I 1, Whether funding is local, state or a combinpreparation would estimate the cost of survey, design, of plan, specifications, project administration and inspection to cost between $80,000 and $100,000 per $1,000,000 of construction. Therefore, additional requirements for the Engineering Department for each One Million Dollars of project cost per year would be one design engineer, one draftsperson, and one constru~oiectsnthecconstructioniinspector maytor may other p j not be necessary. 2. In accordance to Section 33.1-70.01 of the Code of Virginia, The Board of Supervisors jointly with the Resident Engineer for VDOT prepare a Six Year Plan for .I~~~provement to Secondary Road Systems in the County. Since the Six Year Plan reflects projected needs for road improvements, I believe it is within the County's authority to establish Economic Development as a criteria for road needs. Specifically adding secondary road improvements to the Six Year Secondary Road Construction Plan to benefit Economic Development, could be done by the Board of Supervisors. 1V''-~ 3. Section 33a1SecondarnsRoadsibn Counties,vement of Primary an y -Y Paragraph "A" Say that these requirement apply to several Counties listed, and any County either having an Urban County Executive form of Government or having a population which exceeds 125,000. Since Roanoke County is not specifically listed in paragraph "A" and I don't believe would qualify under the Urban County Executive Form of Government, then Roanoke County could not participate in construction and future reimbursement of Secondary or Primary Road Projects. Paragraph "D" does provide that the Countieslandted may undertake activities toward the design, acquisition, or construction of Primary or Secondary Roadway Projects, that have been inclTOVisionshareix Year Plan. Within that paragraph, p also specified as to entering into contracts and the ability foSetthe Countyaforpexpensesoincurred ination to reimbur carrying out these activities. I am forwarding a copy of this memo to Mr. Mahoney, County Attorney, for him to ualifanundercthisdparticularosection,whether Roanoke County does q Y pc: Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney John R. i~bbServicesi&tDevelopmentA~inistrator of Common Y • ~ CODE OF VIRQrINIA ~ 33.1-70.01 § sa.l•~o.ol Cross reference. -For Pi'o ~o~on, ~ . the subject matter of the sepeal ~ 33.1-70.01. officers; siz-year plan for ' ~ 33.1-70.01. Annual meeting with county Ve bod of each - county, roads. -'fie bos-rd of sups, nay ~~ ~ ~ldent engin~r for the county m the secondary system may,1 nation or other representatives of the ' Department of Highways and Transpo nation Commis- Department as designated by the State Highway and Transpo _ sinner, pre serfs ~~ -Y Ea ill su h six-year pilanmshall be based,upon~the best erysti~mate of~fiinds to be avacihlable to the county for nditure in the six-year a tem. Each such plan ahallt the proposedimprove- - period on the secondary ys , so listed. Following the meats, together with an estimated cost of each project y preppaarration bl~ helms ~~r rubliahing nnotice in as newspape p b shedm conduct a pu rruu-iggation in the county once a week for two successive or having eneral circul at the front door of the ,weeks, ~~ ng notice of the proposed hearing At the ublic hearings, courthouse o such couaty ten days bbefore~e c~h~ ~ ~~~~ and reP- which shall be conducted jointly g nation, the entire resentative ° shall be eat with the citizenadof he i~ro~untY and their views siz-year plan pe c0o~'d~g • ~y1~o gather wi eorepr~esen~ta~eo of the Department of Hi hways and TransPort~'tioni sha115na1ize and officially adopt the aiz-year ~ ply which shall then be considered the official plan of the county. At least once in each calendar y~ a of such secondary syatepam~of state ~ 1~ Higghways, and Transportation m m'8 artment deli tad highwa s in each county, or some representative of the Dap $~ y shall meet with the by the State Highway and Transportation Co ofhoneror~ty ~ a regular or board of supervisors or other governing body for the purpose o prepar- special meeting of such board or other governing body ing a budget for the expenditure of jmprovement funds for the nez~5~ a1 Year. The representative of the Department of Highways and aT~a~~~ ~d the rvisors with an updated of ~_ furnish the board of sups, board and the representa~e ~ of rn~~ec~to beocarri~ ut~in~tha~year tion shall jointly p P~ lan by o er of priority, and followin generally the taken 5rom the-sizyear P policies of the na ~ ~gstemyimprovemen Suicoh list~of~pnoritiema shgall then bee statewide seco ary p~ before outl lased, an comments of~ e ~ be obtainedpand con- here the board, with the concurrence of the sidered. Following this Public h eearinog~ Highways and Transportation, shall representative of the DePanm ter, and the Department ado~ppt~, as official, a riority program for the enswng y • of Highways and importation shall include such hated Projects in its sec' I ondary roads budget for the county for that year. At least once every two years, following the adovt~on of the original six-year plan, the board of supervisors or other g ear o ~~wYays sass ~a~~~0n, with the representative of the Departm B shall update the six-year plan of such county by adding to it and extending it lan encompassing six gears. Whenever as n so as to maintain it asap became available, the governing additiooa~~ for secondary road piirpoaes 1 ch p body ma request a revision ui ancdih~ of such additional f~iinds Such addi- amended to provide for the exile ~ the same Lions and extensions to each six-year plan shall be prepared i 36 _._._.-----.. Iaanner and following the same procedures as outlined e~iinng ~f~~ ~d ~e PTe~aration. Where the board of suppeervisors or other go ent of highways and , resident engineer or other representative of the Depart~m ~~ or ver l h 'haasportation fail to aggrreeee upon a priori~Pro~~rtation Commiss~ er. ~dy may appeal to the State H'gl `"auY ~d • p o ~~ and render a decision Commissioner shall consider alp p°redn a coaeaderation by the Commis- establishing apriority program bases upo sinner of the welfare and safety of county citizens' such decision shall be binding. Mans shall consider all ezisting roads in the secondary All such six-year p system, including those in the towns m ~d ~ be made aatuabrle, mdain~~'e end ~ a part of the state secondary syste (Code 1950, 433.1-?0; 1970, c. 322;197?, c. 578;1979, c. ;1981, c. 240.) 4 33.1-70.1. R.equestin~ Departmfnatay ~~ ~a re ~asulta~ rowith . Whenever the governing body nation may adopt a personnel of the Department of Highways and Transpo resolution requesting the Department of HiBha-ape~ Tr'e~p~°y~~ ~ ~ hard-surface any secondary road in such counh~ whi ad oats for such vehicles per day with a hard surface of width and strength rtat~ion shall give traffic volume, the Department of Higghwa~-s and nTrtyans eP ~ndiag the funds consideration to such resolution in establishing p ~~~ to such county. (1973, c. 360;1977, c. 578.) 4 33.1.71. Annual statement concerning improvements to be Sled with county governing bodies -The ~P~ent of Highways and'h~ans- portation shall v~nthin a reasonable tune bra r otherf ov rn a~g bodies of with each of the several boards of sups $ designated by number counties a statement settnnghflo~rth,' (provaem ntgshwe e~made during such fiscal located in the county upo year, (b) the amount expended for improvements on each such highway during such fiscal year, and (c) the nature of such improvement. (Code 1950, 4 33-47.1; 1958, a 317; 1970, c. 322.) . 4 33.1.72: Repealed by Acts 19?9, c. 321. 1 ` HIGHV~/A1lS, BRIDGES AND F~R~9 f 33.1.72.1 i ... ~ 33.1-70.1 to similar subject mamatter. ses ii 33.i 72ia~ stem. - A• 433.1-?2.1. Taking cep m~ a street or highw y h wn on a pplat "Street," as used in this ned ~ public nse rior to July 1,19?7, at which was recorded or otherwise ope which time it was open to and used by motor vehic~ f ~~ highways and reason, has not been taken into the secondary syste serves at least three families per mile. B. "County,"as used in this section, means a county in which the secondary system of the state highways is constructed and maintained by the Department of Highways and Transportation and which has adopted a local standards for control of the development of subdivision streets to the nec8ssary acceptance into the secondary system. _ ,.. • C. Whenever the governing body of a county recommends in wntmg to the Department of Highways and'15cansportation that m of~the state highways in taken into and become a part of the secondary syste nation thereupon, such co~n~y, the Department of Highways and Transco within the limit of available funds and the mileage available in such county • 3? • ~ ~ w "~ r.• L ~.b, 4~ M- r ... . ' . ~(}HwAYB, BRIDl3E8 AND FSBRI>38 .. - . ; 33.17b.3 • • ' ;39.1-76.3 . ' ~ ; 35.1.7b.3. Construcdoa and Improvement of pclmary or secondaty roads b counties. - A. Notwithstanding an other provisions of this f James Ci Coun ~ Coon Loudoun article ~e ~ coon ei - . o un an e v on w ve orm o vertuaen ar a • ~ e ur an coon ezecu e n n raven revenues • ~ au o env m e e ° n ' °r ~~, iroaciuding~ gutt81'0. drain' - - Purpose of constructing or improving . ' ageways, sound barriers, sidewalks, and all other fea • conducive to the public safety anon venienoe,m ofstate highways.~e~ - maybe taken into the ~nmary o dary syste . planninS and the acquisition of rights-of-way shall be under the control an at the direction of the county, subject to the approval of project plans ~ . spe ~''fiications by the Department of 1~ansportat~on. All costa ~ ~ . Department of Transportation in a such contracts m revenues derived from reimbursed from the county's general revenues, thn or such - . ~ the sale of bonds, or from a county's federal revenue sharing be e~nti'tled to costs may be charged a ainst the funds which the county may . under the provisions of ;~ 33.1-23.1, 33.1-25.2 or ; 33.1-23.4. . B. Projects ands ~ eftmds two wbiachu aoc~ ty ma be anti ed under the shall not diminish 55.1.23.2, 33.1-23.4, or ~ 33.1-?b.L - provisions of ;; 55.1-25.1, nt of Transportation may C. At the request of the count)' the Departure , ition or construction of age to undertake the design, nghtrof--way acquis pprgiects tbnded by the county. In such situations men~~~t ~ . 'l~ansportation and the county will, enter into an agiee~~a~ ~~~way relevant procedures and responsibilities coacernm8~' n ~thpe~~ ~ be funded by ' acquisition, construction or contract adminiatra t of'15ranspcrtation for the county The county will reimburse the De~artmet the aforesaid activities all cysts incurred by the Department in canymg from ~enatal revenues or revenues derived $bm the sale of bonds. ~• -- - D. Notwitha an con rovision of law the coon o~a e e ~~ w e an i o or t ve n siz or sewn roa wa ro acts wa an ear an ursuan or in a case a approv prod u ~ in a siz-year provemen P ant of ('rnmmenwealth Z'rgngportatfon Board. TIl each Sltuati ~,mthe De~partrnng ~y ~uv "`r°` ,,....._~ - - nation, ana T,ne ,.,o ~•••`•.... concurrence of the Department of ~ ~~ ~ ~, reimburse the coon fore uses incurred in or eecon _ u ream ursemen en a provisions e w e oo ~e these activities in accordance witb all applicable ~i n~~qq p~royi~edures. Provided the Commissioner finds that those Doan rocedures are substantially similar to departmental procedures and - pcations. (1981, c. 321;1982, ~ 18;1983, cc. 521, 32b; 1984, c. 127;1 8b, c. 562; 1988, a 654; 1989, c. 1 ) istration of ooatracts awardedby the county for . • The 188 amendment deleted "e:coed Sly _ $ve •' mihiom` dollars ~ in saY g `ed;m naish ~ undertaken by the Dspartaunl d ~o~'' " ~ ~~ on B°g lion," deleted the former subsection C Pe~°- - The 1888 amendment deleted the last sea' ~ ~ Pt'cD~ of ~ C~°0°d~ D. ~ fence in subsection A which read'The admire- added the presen 32 ~- - y . ' , ~ •~ • • manner and following the same procedures as outlinedverning ~fbody and Hthe preparation. Where the ~~ of supervisors or other go ent of Highways and dent engineer or other representative of the Depar ~ ~~ or governing ~~portation fail to agree u n a priori progra~~on Commissioner. The lwdy may appeal ~ the S~de~~l v'~ ~d ~ and render a deciaioa Commissioner shall, consro b P upon a consideration by the Commis- eatabliahing a p ' t3- P Gram sinner of the welfare and safety of county citizens. Such decision shall binding. 'lens shall consider all existing roads in the secondary Ail such six-year p system, including those in the towns located in the county thaapt are maintain as a part o0f th 3s3ta1t70se1970da c 322; 1977, c. 5781 1~9,da 64; 981ac 240.)h (Code 195 , ~ ~ 33.1.70.1. Requesting Department to hard-~aftea re consulta~ with . Whenever the governing bod~~y of any county, nation may adopt a personnel of the Department of Highways and w'I5c'a a ~d ~~on to resolution requesting the Department of High Y ~ ~~ or more hard-surface any secondary road in such county w ad oats for such vehicles per day with a a~rtnnensutrfoaf ~ hwa s ~ ~po~h n shall give traffic volume, the Dep ~ riori m e nding the funds consideration to sum reso 1973, c. 3G0; l~h 7,gcp 578. ~ allocated to such ty ;33.1-71. Annual statement concerning improvements to be Sled with county governing bodies. -The Department of Highways and 15rana- rtation shau within a reasonable time afterr otherf e v rni~ ng bodies of nth each of the several boards of superv~so , wa designated by number counties a statement setting forth: (a) each high y, located in the county upon which improvements were made during such 5sca~ year, (b) the amount expended for improvements on each such highway during such 5aca1 year, and (c) the nature of such improvement. (Code 1950, 4 33-47.1; 1958, c. 317;1970, c. 322.) ~ 33.1-?2: Repealed by Acts 1979, c. 321. f 331-70.1 HIGHVVAYB, sRIDGEB '_ .• •.,• l ~ pig f 33.1.72.1 I to similar subject matterraee ~ 93.1.72.18 ~ 33.1-72.1. Takinng certain streets into secondary system. -p A. 'street, as used in this section, meIIansed top blic name gnoryto July 1~19771at which was recorded or otherwise ope which time it was open to and used by motor ve~c~ ~ state highways and reason, has not been taken into th~secondary sy serves at least three families pe B. "County,"as used in this section, means a county in which the secondary system of the state highwa~m~,o ~ w~~ ~~ ~ a loycal or~di'n~ for of Highways and'l~ranspo standards for control of the development of subdivision streets to the nec8ssary acceptance into the secondary sY~em- recommends in writing to the C. Whenever the governingbody of ratacett'on~that any street in the county be Department of Highways an 'h~anspo taken into and become a part of the secondary system of the state highways in such co~ntq, the Department of Highways and '~ans~ortation thereupon, within the limit of available funds and the mileage available in such county 3? ; $3.1.70.01 CODE OF VI8OINIA 33.1-?0.01 - Croy reference. -For PZ'~ ~~~ the subject matter of the repeal f99.1-70.01. 33.1-70.01. Annual meeting with county officers; siz-year Plan for ~ . county roads. -The board of supervisors or other governing body of each county in the secondary system may, jointly with the resident engineer for the Department of Hi~hwaya and Transportation or other representatives of the Department as desigiated by the State Highway and T~rtation Commis- sioner, prepare a svc•Year plan for the improvements to secondary road • system in that county. Each such six-year plan shall be based upon the best estimate of funds to be available to the county for expenditure in the six-year period on the secondary system. Each such plan shah ~P _ .PF~ Ong ~e meats, together with an estimated cost of each prod fed preparation of the plan, the board of supervisors or other governing bboli~~ ~ conduct a public hearing after ppublishuig notice in a newspape p or having eneral circulation in the county ones a week for two successive g h at the front door of the weeks, and Posting notice ~ of the proposed Baring courthouse of such county ten days before such meeting. At the public hearings, which shall be conducted jointly bp• the board of super~natreio ~~e titre resentative of the De eat of highways and Transpo siz-year plan shall be with the citizens of the county and their views considered. Following such discussion, the board of auperv~eors °i'ent~~ ggooverning bod together with the represents o~aall a~ do t~h~e msiz-year I Highways and 'IYansportationt shall finalize and y Pt ~ plan which shall then be considered the official plan of the county. At least once in each calendar year representatives of the Department of Hi hways, and Transportation in charge of such secondary system of state hig~wa s m each county, or some representative of the Department designated by the Mate Highway and Transportation Commissioner, shall meet with the board of super~nsors or other governing body of each county in a regular or • special meeting of such board or other governing body for the purpose o prepar- ing abudget for the expenditure of Improvement funds for the next Hscal year. The representative of the Department of Highwa a~d~T~a os~~~ ~ ~8 furnish the board or~f su~ aria fr~~~ ~ ui~~ghways and ansporta- tib oan~sha~lldjo~intly prepare the list of pronto be carried out m that fiscal year taken from the~six-year plan by order of priority, and following generally the policies of the State Highway and Transportation Commission in regard to the statewide secondai~r system improvements. Such list of priorities shall then be ppresented at a public hearing duly advertised in accordance with theprocedure hereinbefore outlined, and comments o~ ~~ ~~1 ~ ~nc~s of the sidered. Following this PubUc heanng nation, shall representative of the Department ot~ Highways and Transpo adopt, as official a priority program for the ensuun year, and the De~iaitment of Highways an~ transportation shall include su~ hated Projects in its sec" ondary roads budget for the county for that year. At least once every two years, following the adoption of the original six-year plan, the board of supervisors or other governin body of each county, motion, with the representative of the Department of ~ghways and Transpo shall update the six-year plan of such county by adding to it and extending it ~ n so as to maintain it as a plan encompassing six years. Whenever ~~hoe~ naluiids for secondar~- road purposes become .available, the governing ~ body ma request a revision in such six-year plan in order that such plan be . amended to provide for the expenditure of such additional funds. Such addi- tions and extensions to each six-year plan shall be prepared in the same 36 ..._ . - -- - __------.r--- ~~~ ~ ~~ •' • ~. .. • ~' .. . ~ .~ • _ . 1, '. - ~ 33.1-76.3 - HIQHWAYB, BRID(388 AND Y>S~S f 83.1-7b.8 f 33.1.7b.3. Construction sad improvement otop~rimary . voisions of this roads b counties. - A. Notwithstanding ~Y _ rick Coun Loudoun article, t~ f James i Coon _ __.. ~.~ e. a~~ - e coon ezecunve corm vi v~=a====~• ". ne raven revenues .. ~ au o e env m e e ~ or ~ u~~,~~ ~~ drain- ~ . . • ~ purpose of constructin6 or improving roads, . ageways, sound barriers. sidewalks, and all other fen or a • ~ conducive to the public safety and convenienoa, which either ve been . . ~ may be taken into the primary or secondary system of state highways. Prq~j, - pDing and the acquisition ofrights-of-way shall be under the control and at tshpeeadfiirection boyf the county, subject to the approval of p act p ~ such contracts be . Depar men~ofZ~a s~po~~ atin ~~rtatwn. All costa reimbursed from the counts general revenues, revenues derived $om - ~ the sale of bonds, or from tthhe county's federal revenue sharing ~ ~ ~~ ~ coats may be charged ~g~unst the funds which the county may under the provisions of ~~ 33.1-28.1, 83.1-23.2 or ~ 83.1-23.4. B. projects undertakes under the authority at subsection A of this section • shall not diminish the funds to which a county a-ay be entitled wader the • provisions of 44 88.1-23.1, 35.1.23.2 33.1-28.4, er t ~ .1-7~ b~~tion may C. At the request of the count~- th Departmen •tion or construction of agree to undertake the design, nght-of-way aognisi QQroJecte funded by the county. In such situations the Department ~ , ~Ys~nsportation and the oswnty will enter into an meat relevant procedures and responsibilities concerning the ~ ~~ acquisition, construction or contract administration of pro? bon for the oo~mt~- The ~o~nty will reimburse the s~ppa~r~ eat of'h~ansporta . all costs incurred by the Department in aurying~out the aforesaid activities from g~eeneral revenues or revenues derived fry the sale of bonds. ~- ~ - D. Notwi Don rovisioa of law the coon ma ~ w e esi on or co on nrima!'9 or sewn _ I'oS Wa acts t _ oe_ _ _ _......e... , arno_ sn Such situations, the s into an attreemen_ °i' `••° •,`'.`......~_~ --- -- rtatian, and the i)e atTmen~ s concurrence of the Department of 'l~anspo _,___~ ~ ~ e~ reimburse the coon for Hasa incurred in or eecon _ u resin ureemen riv m yy e °~ licabla aunty may undertake these activities in a~da ce with all app coonty p~urea, Provided the Commissioner fords that those coon rocedutea are substantially similar to departmeatalures and - pcations. (1981, c. 321; 1982, a 218; 1983, oc. 321, 3 , 1984, a 127;185, G 662; 1988, c. 654; 1989, t» 143.) - - • ~ . - • _~ The 1886 amendment deleted "eased SRr letTation deontracts awarded by the oo~mh- for • llseal Jmm nor" Svc eonsecutiw road conet~uelion or iaaprovemeut sha11 bs -dlminieh the nndertal~sn b7 ~ Department et'lYansporu thuds" in subsection B. tion,' dskted the Loaner subsection C p~- - The 1988 amendment deleted the last sea ~ to pojeet coordination psooedures and fence in snDeection A which read "1lie admia- added the present subsections C and D. 32 ACTION # ITEM NUMBER ~" AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: December 19, 1989 AGENDA ITEM: Accounts Paid - October 1989 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Payments to Vendors: $ 2,096,774.19 Payroll: 11/9/89 $ 418,010.57 842,792.27 11/22/89 424,781.70 $ 2,939,566.46 A detailed listing of the payments is on file with the Clerk to the Board of Supervisors. SUBMIT'PED BY: .~ Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance APPROVED: ~~ ~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator --------------- VOTE - ACTION u~ vAG Ahs Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred To Motion by: Garrett Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers ACTION # ITEM NUMBER ~ ~» ~' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BNOKE OCOUNTYEADMINISTRA'I'IONNOCENTER COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROA MEETING DATE: December 19, 1989 AGENDA ITEM: Accounts Paid - November 1989 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: $ 4,557,912.52 Payments to Vendors: Payroll: 11/9/89 $ 406,827.61 839,344.19 11/22/89 432,516.58 $ 5,397,256.71 A detailed listing of the payments is on file with the Clerk to the Board of Supervisors. SUBMITTED BY: Y`JC-Q1'~ ~ . Diane D. Hyat ctor of Finance APPROVED: ~~ ~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator Dire --------- -------- ----------------------- VOTE -------------------------ACTION No Yes Abs Approved ( ) Motion by: Denied ~ ~ Received ( ) Referred To Garrett Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers N~ COUNTY OF ROANOgB INCOMB ANALYSIS GBNBRAL OPBRATING FUND 1989-90 19 88-89 -------- - ____ ---------------- -------------- ------------------- --- ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL 10-31-89 6-30-89 10-31-88 X BUDGBT (4 MONTAS) X BUDGBT ( 12 MONTAS) (4 MONTAS) __________ _ ___ = 25,T80,009 ------- - 27,092,820 ----------- 1,492,815 6 3 3 28,511,TT0 668,447 11 1,118,854 609,366 4 5 TAXBS-RBAL BSTATB 10,200,000 11,661,1T1 336,031 4 , 435,000 1 43,683 3 TAXES-PERSONAL PROPERTY 1,257,293 1,323,327 49,327 23 , 200,000 4 1,102,927 26 OTABR PROPBRTY TAXES 4 390,492 ' 3,841,459 990,217 3 , 100,000 2 60,242 3 SALES TAX 2,400,000 2,182,235 64,936 5 , 325,000 1 63,646 5 BUSINBSS LICENSE 1,150,000 1,283,174 62,821 22 , 180,000 4 967,187 23 AUTO DBCALS 4,015,220 3,200,232 893,083 11 , 15,500 1,487 10 OTABR LOCAL TAXBS 18,000 14,963 1+939 56 10,500 7,392 TO DOG TAGS 15,000 25,426 8,368 31 408,611 140,087 34 ZONING FBBS 345,000 321,549 105,826 76 2,250 5,610 77 BllILDING FBBS OTABR PERMIT, FBBS 8, LICBNSBS 11,282 000 162 31,525 209,125 8+549 55,071 _ 34 165,000 0 42,50 20 FINBS AND FORFEITURES SALES A USB OF BQUIPMBNT A SUPPLIBS , 0 150 510 151 162,774 150 37,876 0 25 160,401 500 554 31,697 165,967 20 30 CAARGBS FOR SBRVICBS , 504,029 558,006 194,327 39 18 , 200,000 41,644 21 RBCOVBRBD COST-LOCAL 230,045 185,794 41,908 25 251,670 62,939 25 ABC PROFITS COMMONfiBALTA'S ATTORNBY BXPBNSBS 260,503 270,000 3 225,982 3,255,067 65,622 459,222 12 3,837,277 000 180 766,681 41,909 20 23 SABRIFF'S BXPBNSBS COMMISSIONER OF THB RBVBNUB'S BXPBNSBS , 179,485 121 853 147,593 166,125 36 652 + 40,178 21 23 , 180,000 74 39,633 476 299 2i 1~ TRBASURBR'S BXPBNSBS , 1,961,441 1,593,546 277,891 14 50 2,067,4 175,000 , 67,566 51 VBLFARB GRANT 125,000 174,860 62,430 23 225,000 133,243 5' LIBRARY GRANT 286,803 239,336 62,330 46 0 5,305 OTABR STATB RBVBNUB 5,035 6,520 2,340 0 NON-RBVBNUB RBCBIPT O 0 0 -------0- ------------ _ - TRANSFBR FROM OTABR FUNDS - - _____ _ ____________ -------'-- 9 -- - 858,400 61 5,699,644 1 57,439,000 58,411,315 5,380,664 , BBGINNING BALANCE USBD TO BALANCE 202 091 4 0 0 0 1,328,452 p 0 0 COSTS OF OPERATIONS TBMPORARY LOANS ~ LBASB PURCAASB PROCBBDS , , 265 006 + 559,133 0 0 0 0 0 202,168 0 - BOND PROCBBDS - ------- --- - ----------- - ------------ -------- 9 369,020 S 63 ~ 5 899 644 , + 3 ~ 62,295,708 f 58,970,448 5 380 664 = + , ........... . :::.::::::: : ~ SPECIAL CONSIDBRATION ADDBD TO BASIC COMPUTATION N-.:5 COUNTY OF ROANOIB STATBMBNT OF BIPBNDITURBS FOUR MONTHS BNDBD OCTOBBR 31, 1989 BUDGBT BIPBNDBD x GENERAL ADMINISTRATION 3 176,678 ~ 74,920 42 27 BOARD OF SUPBRVISORS 258,668 71,104 33 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR 241,769 79,680 33 PBRSONNEL 186,341 61,432 27 COUNTY ATTORNEY 513,713 140,410 28 COMMISSIONBR OF RBYBNUB 504,229 142,697 27 TRBASURBR 163,012 43+782 0 BLBCTIONS p 11 SESQUICENTENNIAL FISCAL MANAGBMBNT ASST, CO ADM. MANAGBMBNT SBRVICBS 69,621 489 654 20,730 180,016 30 28 COUNTI ASSESSOR , 387,692 130,134 34 33 CENTRAL ACCOUNTING 218,274 71,074 25 PROCURBNBNT 125,572 31,804 56 NANAGBMBNT 1 BUDGBT 1,130,318 636,293 RISE MANAGEMENT JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION 118,133 6,884 6 19 CIRCUIT COURT 20,204 3,757 17 GBNBRAL DISTRICT COURT 730' 127 35 MAGISTRATES _ 11,758 4,072 29 J A D DISTRICT COURT 516,653 149,259 33 CLERI OF CIRCUIT COURT 312,278 101,541 11 COMMONifBALTB'S ATTORNEY 175 44 7,367 PROBATION OFFICE , 6,670 961 14 VICTIM iIITNBSS PUBLIC SAFBTY 4,215,118 1,290,503 31 6 POLICING !~ INVESTIGATING 960 60 36 HIGHWAY SAFETY COMMISSION 2,098,075 745,738 44 FIRE 433,759 191,619 33 RESCUE SQUAD BNERGBNCY SBRVICBS A BAZ MAT RBSPONSB 42,535 2 018,249 14,037 665,302 33 CONFINBMBNTICARB OF PRISONBRS , 164,044 65,351 40 ANIMAL CONTROL p T10 BAZ-MAT RESPONSE p 57,140 HOGO DISASTER RBCOVBRY PUBLIC FACILITIBS SUPBRINTENDBNT OF PUBLIC FACILITIBS 112,694 350 26 35,088 0 31 STREET LIGHTS , 693,269 222,326 32 32 BNGINBBRING 208,870 66,329 24 GBNBRAL SBRVICBS 816,204 199,069 32 BUILDINGS l GROUNDS 880,781 318,391 31 PARES A RECREATION 1,579,749 495,278 20 RBFUSE 65,400 12,869 38 PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION 923~Og2 346,393 GROUNDS MAINTENANCE :FINANCIAL STATEMENTS: PAGE 2 OF 3 COUNTY OF ROANOgB STATBNBNT OF g%PBNDITURBS FOUR NONTBS BNDBD OCTOBBR 31, 1989 HBALTH L SOCIAL SBRYICBS 599 412 101,144 25 PUBLIC BBALTfl SOCIAL SBRYICBS ADMINISTRATION , 1,840,244 554,346 30 30 PUBLIC ASSISTANCB 954,030 000 36 286,317 13,488 37 INSTITUTIONAL CARB , 984 94 17,496 18 SOCIAL SBRVICB ORGANIZATIONS , DBVBLOPMBNT 553 311 101,016 32 PLANNING A ZONING , 530 264 143,173 54 BCONOMIC DBVBLOPMBNT , 602 134 42,865 32 DBVBLOPMBNT RBVIBN , 695 18 5,694 30 PLANNING COMMISSION CONSTRUCTION BUILDING SBRVICBS , 262,842 89,275 34 NON-DBPARTMBNTAL ASST. CO. ADM. HUNAN SBRVICBS LIBRARY BXTBNSION A CONTINUING BDUCATION BMPLOYBB BBNBFITS CONTRIBUTIONS TO SBRVICB ORGANIZATIONS MISCBLLANBOUS CONSOLIDATION 97,675 29,693 30 1,147,333 349,628 30 104,694 2,146 2 759,298 63,946 8 30,000 19,200 64 867,430 76,609 9 200,000 12,420 6 TOTAL TRANSFBRS AND RBSBRVBS RBIMBURSABLB EgPBNDITURBS TRANSFBR TO DBBT SBRVICB TRANSFBR TO INTBRNAL SBRVICB TRANSFBR TO SCHOOL OPBRATING FUND TRANSFBR TO SBUBR FUND TRANSFBR TO UTILITY CAPITAL TRANSFBR TO CAPITAL PROJBCTS TRANSFBR TO YOUTH BAVBN TRANSFBR TO GARAGB II UNAPPROPRIATED BALANCB RBSBRVB FOR BOARD CONTINGENCY TOTAL TRANSFBR ITBMS GRAND TOTAL 27,589,614 8,592,724 31 ----------- ------------ ----------- 0 (185) 0 5,668,360 541,590 10 327,ST2 101,944 31 - 28,637,950 0 0 40,000 0 0 525,000 175,000 33 383,783 127,928 33 78,658 26,219 33 120,000 0 0 (3,750 0 0 (669 0 ------ --- 0 --------- ------------ - 35,777,204 ------------ ----- 972,496 ------------ --- 3 --------- ~ 63,366,818 ~ 9,565,220 15 Fioaacial State~eets: Page 3 of ~ ~~ COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA UNAPPROPRIATED BALANCE -CAPITAL FUND Beginning Balance at July 1, 1989 (Unaudited) September 12, 1989 Contribution towards Hollins Fire Truck Balance as of December 19, 1989 Submitted by ~~ ~ ~~ Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance $ 56,194 25 000 3~ 1.194 COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA UNAPPROPRIATED BALANCE -GENERAL FUND Unaudited $4,038,318 Balance at July 1, 1989 ( ) (106,980) November 15, 1989 Dental Insurance 180 000 November 28, 1989 Drainage Projects 37$ Balance as of December 19, 1989 Submitted by ~~~~~~ Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance N- 8 June 14, 1989 July 11, 1989 July 11, 1989 July 25, 1989 August 8, 1989 COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA RESERVE FOR BOARD CONTINGENCY Beginning Balance at July 1, 1989 (Unaudited) Additional Amount from 1989-90 Budget Contribution to Va. Amateur Sports Purchase of drainage easement Option on 200 acres real estate Donation to Julian Wise Foundation County supplement for new position in Sheriffs Department August 22, 1989 Part time volunteer coordinator August 22, 1989 Public Information for Police Department referendum November 28, 1989 Stormwater Feasibility Study Balance as of December 19, 1989 Submitted by ~~ ~. ~~ Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance $11,395 50,000 (25,000) (5,000) (3,750) (5,000) (869) (5,800) (9,000) 3 382 ~ 3 594 ACTION N0. . ~ ITEM NUMBER REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD LINTY ADMINISTRP,TIONROC VOTER AT A COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE C MEETING DATE: December 19, 1989 AGENDA ITEM: Citizen Survey on Services COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR' S COMMENTS : ~'h~ ~~~ ~ ~~eQ /~e-r,~.~-s+" ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~' ,~ /k.a-vim / ~~~ BACKGROUND• ervisors, • tember 12, meeting of the Board of Sup of At the Sep uested that the County conduct a survey Chairman Garrett req ro riate uses for the Conforms citizen attitudes on services and aPPstaff prepared a survey $2 million budget surplus. County conducted the telephone survey and tabulated the results. using was conducted between October 5T ea C un y voter The survey County staff to make the telephone calls. From that list, uiries, which represents registration lisondedstosthe ttelephone6inq name The results of 38'7 people resp ling of the population. o ulation a valid statistical same ercentage response of the p p uestion. The total percentage shows the each district show the actual p onses to the of that distr onse r fle c ing the proportion of resp weighted resp istered voters in the County. entire population of reg results indicate an overwhelming satisfaction with County The Rankin s for individual serviemsl gees g e and County P. services and staff. ood" rang , The majority of generally in the "excelleCO rteous and helpful. are perceived as being et surplus should be used to uestions respondents felt that the budg The actual q the services to citizens (one-time expenses). and results are attached for your information. ALTERNATIVES AND IMPACT: RECOMMENDATION: Respectfully submitted, ,. ~ _ ha ~ ~ T ~~, _% - /.ohn M. Chambl' s, Jr. Assistant Administrator Appr wed by, _ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ~- g ---- ------------------------ VOTE ------------------ ACTION No Yes Abs Approved ( ) Motion by: Garrett Denied ( ) Johnson Received ( ) McGraw Referred ( ) Nickens To { ) Robers N- 9 1. Are you generally satisfied with County services? GENERALLY GENERALLY SATISFIED SATISFIED NO ANSWER YES NO DISTRICT - --- ----- - - --- -- - --- ------------- - ------------------ 82.5% 15.0% 2.5% 8% 3 CATAWBA 90 94 1.30 . HOLLINS . 91 40 4.3% 4.3% WINDSOR HILLS . 4% 98 0.0% 1.6% VINTON . 89.20 8.1% 2.7% CAVE SPRING _ ------------ - ----- -- ----------------- ---------------- --- 91.0% _ 6:0% 3.0% TOTAL 2, What do you consider the quality of the school service to be? SCHOOL SCHOOL SCHOOL SCHOOL SCHOOL DON'T KNOW NO ANSWER SCHOOL FAIR p00R ISTRICT EXCELLENT GOOD ------ ----'----- --- - ---- - - _ -------- 16.3% 0.0% -------- - ____ ____ ----- 31.3% _____ - 51.3% 0.0% 3.go 16.50 % 0 CATAWBA 25.3% 4fi.80 7.6° 5% 6 0.0° 18.3% . 0.0% HOLLINS HILLS 39.80 35.5% . 3.3% 0.0° 13.1% % 0.0% WINDSOR 9% 45 37.7% 2.70 23.0 VINTON . 39.2% 31.1% 4.1% - --- ------ --------- ----- _ - -------- - - - 0% 0 CAVE SPRING. _ ------ --------- -- - -------- --- 3% 1 17 7% . - --- -------- ------------- 36.3% 40.1% 4.6% . TOTAL onsider the quality of the parks and recreation service to be? PARK REC 3, What do you c PARK REC PARK REC PARK ' REC KNOW NO ANSWER PARK REC PARK RE C FAIR T DON POOR °--- --- ___ - DISTRICT EXCELLENT GOOD - ------ ------------ -- _ - --- - - ° - -- ° 17.50 ° 12.50 ----- ----------- --------- -------------------- 0% 0 56.3% 11.3% 2.50 2 5% 12.7% 0.0% CATAWBA . 16.5% 57,0% 11'4° . 4.3° 16.1% 0.0% 0% 0 HOLLINS 22 6% 41.9° 15.1% 19 7° 0.0% 6.6% . 1.4% WINDSOR HILLS 70 19 54.1% ' 1.4% 16.2% UINTON . 17.6% 47.3% 16.2% - -------- --------- - -- ------- _ ----- ---- 2 8 CAUE SPRING -------- ------ ---- -- -------------- 2.2% 14.2% ____ --------- -- ____ -------- -- 15.3% 50.8% 14.6% TOTAL Page 1 ~~- 9 the quality of the garbage collection service to be? GARBAGE 4, What do you consider GARBAG GARBAGE E GARBAG E NO AN SWER GARBAGE GARBAGE POOR DON'T KNOW _ ______ FAIR EXCELLENT GOOD ------------ -------- _ 0.0% DISTRICT -- ----------- --------- --- ---------- ------ _ -- 8% 18 1.3% 3.8% 0.0% ---- -------------- 57.5% 18.8% . 10.1% 5.1% 0.0% 4 30 0.0% CATAWBA 53.2% 31.6% 4% 5 4.3° . 0.0% NOLLINS 36.6% 49.5% . 1% 13 0.0% 3.3% 0.0% WINDSOR HILLS 55.7% 9% 27 . 1.4% 8.10 __ VINTON . 37.8% 47.3% 5,4% _ ------ - _ -------------- -- ---------- ____ _ 0.0% CAVE SPRING _ - ------- ___ _____ _ ------ - ------ 2.5% 4.1% -------- - - ---- - - - - ------------- 52.3% 30.9% 10.2% TOTAL sider t he quality of the building inspection service to be? P BLD G INSP 5, What do you con BLDG INSP BLDG INSP BLDG ' INS KNOW NO ANSWER BLDG INSP BLDG INSP FA IR PO T DON OR ------- -- ------ --- DISTRICT GOOD EXCELLENT ---------------------- -- __ -------------- - --- 67.5% ~ 0.0% ---- ------------- _ ___ -------- - - 8% 16.3% 3 1.3% 58.2% 0% 0 CATAWBA . 29.10 0.0° 11.4% 0% 2.2° 52.7% . 0.0% HOLLINS 3.20 28.0% 14. 7% 0.0% 37.7% 1.4% WINDSOR HILLS 6% 36.1% 6 19. 2.7% 68 9% VINTON . 20.3% 4.1% - - - - CAVE SPRING _ _ ---- -- ----- - 2.3% 57.8% -- ------ ------ --------- ---- ---- 25 5% 10.9% - - . 3.20 TOTAL u consider the quality of the fire service to be? FIRE FIRE 6, What do yo FIRE FIRE FIRE DON'T KNOW NO ANSWER FIRE FAIR POOR ------ -_- -- RICT GOOD EXCELLENT --- --- ------ ---- - --------------- ------- 6.3% 0.0% DIST -- ------------ - -------- ---------~ --- ------ ---- 0% 57.50 30 6.3% 0.0% 2.5% 10.1% 0.0% 0% 0 CATAWBA . 40.5% 43.0% 3'8° 1% 1.1'° 15.1% . 0.0% HOLLINS 39.80 43.0% 1. 1 6' 1.6% 8.20 0.0% WINDSOR HILLS 4% 54.1% 34 . ° 0.0% 13.5% VINTON . 40.5% 44.6% 1.4% - _ __ _ 0.0% CAUE SPRING -- --------------- --- -- -- - ---'-- -- 1.0% 10.9% ----------- - _ --------- ------- - 46.7% -- 38.7% 2.8% TOTAL Page 2 iv-9 consider the quality of the rescue .squad service to be? RESC UE 7, What do you RESCUE RESCUE NO ANSWER RESCUE DON'T RESCUE RESCUE POOR KNOW -- FAIR EXCELLENT GOOD -------- ------------- -- _ --- --------- - 0% 0 DISTRICT ----- ------ -- ------------- --- --------- --------- 8% 3 0.0% 5,0% . 0.0% --------------- 40.0% . 51.3% 2 5° 3.80 10.1% 0.0% CATAWBA 48.1% . 35.4% 2% 3 i.l° 12.9% 0.0% HOLLINS HILLS 52.7% . 30.1% 8.2% 0'0° 6.6% 0.0% WINDSOR 6% 42 42.6% 0.0% 8.1% VINTON . 52.7% 37.80 1.4% _ --- - - -------- - _ -- ----------- - - 0% 0 CAUE SPRING - ---------- - - ------- --------------- - 1.0% g,7o . ------------------- - --- ------ 47.6% 39.1% 3.6% TOTAL f the law onsider the quali rcement service to e• LAW e LAW LAW ENFO LAW RCEMENT g, What do you c LA~ ENFORCEMENT LAW ENFORCEMENT NO ANSWER MENT E ENFO ENFORCEMENT ENF AI ORCEMENT p00R DO N'T KNOW EXCELLENT R GOOD --- --------------- ----- - ---- " - O 0% DISTRICT ---- --- - ---------" --- ------------ 8% 23 11.3% . 0.0% -------------- 12.5% . 48.8% 2% 15 8.9% 11.4% p,0% CATAWBA 26.6% . 38.0% 2% 17 4.3° 12.9% 0.0% HOLLINS WINDSOR HILLS 11.8% . 53.8% 3% 11.5% 44 3,3% 4.9% _5.40 0.0% VINTON 36.1% . 21.6% 1% 54 4.1% ----- ------- - ____ --- CAVE SPRING 14.9% . --------------"-- ----- --------- -""--- "- 7,8% 0.0% ------------------------- -------'-- -------- 18.2% 3% 48 6.3% 19.4% . TOTAL consider wer service to e. the level of the water W WATER WATER WATER WATER SEWER g, What do you WATER ATER SEWER SEWER SEWER NO ANSWER SEWER SEWER p00R DON'T KNOW "" EXCELLENT GOOD FAIR --- __ ---- -'-----~ _ _ -- - --~ ----° 0.0% DISTRICT ------------- ------- - _ __ ------------- __________ 0% 10 ° 10.0% 38.8% % 0.0% --------------- 6.3° . 35.0% 7% 12 6.3% 17.7 ° p,0% CATAWBA 19.0% . 44.3% 7 S° 4.30 21.5% 0.0% HOLLINS WINDSOR HILLS 16.1% ' 50.5% 11.5% 7° 60 0.0% 13.1% 28.4% 1.4% UINTON 14.8% . 9% 8.1% 45 4.1% ------------ _ _ _----- --- - - CAVE SPRING 12.2% ------ . - ------- ----------- ------- _ -----"-" -- - 0% 5 24.4% 0.3% -------------- ---------------- 13.6% 9.8% 46.9° . TOTAL Page 3 n~-9 10. At the present time, do you feel that service levels in tSE RVICES are: SERVICES SERVICES T00 T00 ABOUT HIGH LOW RIGHT NO ANSWER DISTRICT ---- --- --------- ------------------- ----------------------------- 8% 16.3% 3 78.8% 1.3% CATAWBA . o 90 8.9a 8 81.0% 1.3% HOLLINS . 9.7% 4 30 84.9% 1.1% WINDSOR HILLS . 2% 8 0 85.20 3.3% VINTON . 3.3% 8 10 79.70 1.4% CAVE SPRING . 10.8% --- --- ---------- ------------------- ----------------------------- 6.3% 10.2% 0 81.80 1.6% TOTAL be willing t der to tax o pa n g gain higher level s of services? 11. Would you TAX HIGHER TAX HIGHER FOR SERVICE FOR SERVICE NO ANSWER DISTRICT YES NO ------------------ ------------22.5% --- 72.5% 5.0% CATAWBA 62.0% 7% 36 1.3% HOLLINS . 0% 68.8% 28 3.2% WINDSOR HILLS . 82.0% 16.40 1.6% VINTON 1% 59.5% 31 9.5% CAVE SPRING . --------- ----------------- -------------27.3% --- 68.30 4.4% TOTAL ou be willing ld W articular service level to pay a user fee to raised? y ou 12. USER FEE USER FEE FOR SERVICE. FOR SERVICE NO ANSWER DISTRICT YES NO ---------- ---------------- --------------30.0% --- 65.0% 5.0% CATAWBA 51 9% 80 41 6.3% HOLLINS ' 1% 53.8% 44 2.2% WINDSOR HILLS . 55.7% 41.00 3.3% VINTON 5% 51.4% 36 12.2% CAVE SPRING . ---------- --------------- 0 ---------------38.6% --- 55.40 6.0% TOTAL Page 4 .. This past year, the County 13 collected $2 Million more in revenue than . anticipated. Do you believe that this revenue should be used tINCREASE REDUCE RESERVE SERVICES NO ANSWER DISTRICT TAX -- ------- ---------------------- --------------- 8% 33 ------------ , 17.50 48.8% 0.0% CATAWBA . 60 31 22.8% 45.6% 0.0% HOLLINS . 6% 36 31.2% 32.30 0.0% WINDSOR HILLS . 2% 26 44.3% 0.0% VINTON 29'5° . 4% 28 40.5% 0.0% CAVE SPRING 31.1% . -- - --------- ------------------------------------ 32.7% ------------- 25.40 41.9% 0.0% TOTAL 14. Have you had contact with any County employees? If yes, please rate the level of response you receive RELATIONSHIP WITH COUNTY EMPLOYEES ~-9 NO SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY F ANSWER VERY UNSA ACTORY TIS DISTRICT SATISFACTORY --- ---- -------- --- ---------------- ----------------------- -- ------------ 8% 28 ---- 10.0% 6.3% 37.5% CATAWBA 17.5% . 60 31 6.30 3.8% 39.2% HOLLINS 19.0% . 7% 38 5.4% 1.1% 38.7° WINDSOR HILLS 16.1% . 8% 32 1 6% 1.6% 34.4% VINTON 29.5% o . 3% 20 1.4% 0 O.Oo 52.7% CAVE SPRING 25.70 . -- --------- ------------- --------------- ----------------------- 21.3% -- ------------- 30.3% ----- 4.9% 2.5% .41.0% TOTAL 15. Were the employees courteous and helpful? information promised to you? FOLLOW Did they follow through with any assistance or THROUGH THROUGH HELPFUL HELPFUL YES NO NO ANSWER NO NO ANSWER ---------- ------------- DISTRICT ---------------- YE-------- ---------------- --- -------------- --- 80 13 41.3% -------------- CATAWBA ------------ 51.3% 13.8% 35.0% ~ 45.0% 50.6% . 11.4% 38.0% HOLLINS 59.5% 6.3% 34.2% 6% 37 49 5% 6.5% 44.1% WINDSOR HILLS 54.8% 7.5% . 4% 34 65.6% 0.0% 34.4% UINTON 65.6% 0.0% . 5P 70 39.2% 4.1% 56.8% CAVE SPRING 47.3% O 0% --- -- -------------- ------------ ----------- ------------------------------------ -------------- 3% 39 49.2% 7.20 43.6% 55.1% 5.60 . TOTAL Page 5 ^~ 9 16. Are you registered to vote in the next election? REGISTERED REGISTERED MALE FEMALE TO VOTE TO VOTE DISTRICT YES NO NO ANSWER --------- --------- ------------------ ------------------ Oo 95 - --------------- 5.0 ------- O.Oo 38.8% 61.3% CATAWBA . 0 80 3 0.0% 41.8% 58.20 HOLLINS 96.2% . ° 0% 0 36.6% 63.4% WINDSOR HILLS 97.8'° 2'2° . 0% 0 44.3% 55.7% UINTON 88.5% 11.5% . 4% 1 24.3% 75.7% CAVE SPRING 91.9% 6.80 . --------- ---------- ----------------- ------------------- 1% 94 --------------- 5.6% - ----- 0.3% 36.5% 63.5% TOTAL . Page 6 ~-~ ,~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY , VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, DECEMBER 19, 1989 RESOLUTION 121989-16 CERTIFYING EXECUTIVE MEETING WAS HELD IN CONFORMITY WITH THE CODE OF VIRGINIA WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia has convened an executive meeting on this date pursuant to an affirmative recorded vote and in accordance with the provisions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and WHEREAS, Section 2.1-344.1 of the Code of Virginia requires a certification by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia that such executive meeting was conducted in conformity with Virginia Law. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia hereby certifies that, to the best of each members knowledge: 1. Only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements by Virginia law were discussed in the executive meeting which this certification resolution applies, and 2. Only such public business matters as were identified in the motion convening the executive meeting were heard, discussed or considered by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. On motion of Supervisor Garrett, seconded by Supervisor Robers, and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: yn~~, ~ a-~ c-c~J Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors CC: File Executive Session File l ~~~ ~ ~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, DECEMBER 19, 1989 RESOLUTION R-121989-17 REQUESTING THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY FOR THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA TO GRANT A GOVERNMENTAL CHARTER FOR THE ROANORE METROPOLITAN GOVERNMENT WHEREAS, Article VII, Section 2 of the Constitutional of Virginia, and Chapter 17 of Title 15.1 of the Code of Virginia authorizes the General Assembly to grant a governmental charter for the Roanoke Metropolitan Government; and WHEREAS, the County of Roanoke and the City of Roanoke intend to effectuate a consolidation of their respective governments into a regional government, which is a unit of general government, identified as the Roanoke Metropolitan Government; and WHEREAS, Roanoke County has complied with the provisions of Section 15.1-835 of the Code of Virginia, and has held public hearing on December 19, 1989, after due legal notice, at which the citizens had the opportunity to be heard concerning this proposed charter. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that the General Assembly for the Commonwealth of Virginia is hereby requested to grant a charter for the Roanoke Metropolitan Government, a unit of general government deemed a regional government. This charter for the Roanoke Metropolitan Government is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference for submission as a bill for consideration by the General Assembly of Virginia. On motion of Supervisor Robers to approve charter incorporat- ing changes and corrections as presented, seconded by Supervisor McGraw, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisor Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: lt~ Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Paul Mahoney, Roanoke County Attorney W. C. Dibling, Jr, Roanoke City Attorney John Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator Reta Busher, Director, Management & Budget Roanoke Valley Legislators /~ 89'-~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, DECEMBER 19, 1989 RESOLUTION REQUESTING THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY FOR THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA TO GRANT A GOVERNMENTAL CHARTER FOR THE ROANOKE METROPOLITAN GOVERNMENT WHEREAS, Article VII, Section 2 of the Constitutional of Virginia, and Chapter 17 of Title 15.1 of the Code of Virginia authorizes the General Assembly to grant a governmental charter for the Roanoke Metropolitan Government; and WHEREAS, the County of Roanoke and the City of Roanoke intend to effectuate a consolidation of their respective governments into a regional government, which is a unit of general government, identified as the Roanoke Metropolitan Government; and WHEREAS, Roanoke County has complied with the provisions of Section 15.1-835 of the Code of Virginia, and has held public hearing on December 19, 1989, after due legal notice, at which the citizens had the opportunity to be heard concerning this proposed charter. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that the General Assembly for the Commonwealth of Virginia is hereby requested to grant a charter for the Roanoke Metropolitan Government, a unit of general government deemed a regional government. This charter for the Roanoke Metropolitan Government is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference for submission as a bill for consideration by the General Assembly of Virginia. 1 ~~ ~ ~ 19 DECEMBER 1989 RECOMMENDED AMENDMENTS TO DECEMBER 7, 1989, DRAFT CHARTER OF THE ROANOKE METROPOLITAN GOVERNMENT Page 1 Line 1 "the consolidation of the County of Roanoke" Line 7 "County of Roanoke and ~e to repeal Chapter 216" Line 27 "a regional government and shall be identifed" Page 2 Line 13 "are necessary or expedient to promote or maintain the general welfare, of ~''- ~.~ j~~' safety, health, ---,.~L~ peace, good will, convenience, trade, commerce, and industry of the regional government e-€ or its inhabitants." Page 3 Line 20 "the conduct of any business public service corporation, profession, vocation" Page 4 Line 8 "the use of gas, electricity, telephone, water, cable television" Line 20 "by purchase, gift, devise, bequest, lease, . lease/purchase, or eminent domain" Page 5 Line 10 "a tax on real property in any special ~~ tax district" Line 14 "chargeable to this special ~ tax district" _ Page 6 Line 13 "not inconsistent with this ear charter" Page 7 Line 9 "shall be ~ qualified .-~ voters" Line 18 "four (4) members from even-numbered election districts" Line 20 "the other five (5) members from odd-numbered election districts" Page 8 Line 17 "special meetings by the mayor arty two or more" Page 9 Line 1 "over the meetings of the board and shall represent" Line 6 "The mayor .~ ~z-~egi~ 7 shall perform all other functions or requirements arising from federal or state law." ~~~"~ Line 12 "Government and such other officers, boards and Page 10 commissions" Page 11 Line 8 "The board sT cutives officer shall l hief exe he officers, at the leasure of the board• each other serve officer appointed pursuant to this section may serve for terms established b the board` These officers need not be residents" Line 12 "In the case of the ~se~'s or lonct term f these officers e~--a disability of any o the board" ~-~- _F~: --G , i Line 12 "pleasure of the board, and removal of the Page 12 manager" Line 16 .. , , ,,.. accountable. ^rr Line 21 - '' ~~ ~ ~ I - ~~ n ~.. ... Line 8 } F ~ ` ment heads, deputies and ~ Il Page 13 managers ssistnat a Line 13 "3.12 of this charter, with each department head removable for stood cause onlv." Line 14 "remove all officials and employees ~~ _ ~~,:.. ~. ~~---,R- appointed by the manacter" Page 16 Line 16 .. a a ~ ~. G C-~~~' i -- 11~ • n ~.. L. ua .~. ~.. i r t+-yam-gin ..~.. --- ---- i,~s, and responsibilities of duties " Page 21 Line 6 , The powers, officers shall be" ~ ~ these _ ,.~. Page 22 Page 24 Line 3 "The internal auditor shall be appointed by the board ar~aei~fi Line 12 "-C- =~e e~a~t-i-~•~~-~-~a~i~ , , "«~id~ a~a~t-arm --tg-a~u~ ~ F _ , . reletter remaining paragraphs Line 1 "Commonwealth of Virginia, a "`"' c==c-= . The compensation" four ( 4 ) ears ~`"''' ~'''" Page 26 Line 4 "a term of ~~~ Y ..i. .. n Page 27 Page 28 Line 6 "by general law. Initially two (2) members shall be appointed for four (4) year terms, two S2) members for three (3) year terms, and one (1) member for a two (2) year term." Line 13 "by the manager and who shall be the local board of social services." Line 17 L. t1~S . n'_'QT'_'Te ~' ~ s~37 e'~~'~ mL. '. .. ~_~1. ^~ mL, u......,.a -.-. t.., .. , ~ '- a~€e~-{~-}-~ -r as ' i. , , i., a,,, ..a ,.,yam ,~ ~~ u GTi~ J r ~ t, ..,ti.,,t,,,., ,.. m • ~ L.... L. 1 , L. L L. i~ • ~ •.• • ine 14 .^,'' ~. ~~.... ce A'lZ'LTZ'e ' i.l, iL, ~ {" {.rc1 7 •. 1 F, J- , .+......~~ ~-r-- ---- "chairman and vice-chairman. Five (5) members of the school board shall initially serve four (4) year terms from July 1 1993. Four (4) , members of the school board shall initially serve two (2) year terms from Julv 1, 1993. The four (4) members to serve two (2) year terms from July 1 1993 shall reAresent the same election districts as the initial two- year term members of the regional government. Thereafter members of the school board shall be appointed biennially for four-year terms in July of odd-numbered years Any vacancy on the school board shall be filled by the governing body of the regional government for the unexpired portion of the applicable term ._ .. .. ~ r Page 29 Line 4 "The treasurer shall ee-~~e ~ ~~~~ece~~~e and receipt of all regional government" Page 31 Line 11 "generally accepted priniciples of ~}~ governmental accounting and budgeting" Page 33 Line 7 "majority of all members of the board not later than May 15" Line 18 "probable to the ~a~e~ director of finance that the revenues available Line 20 "the ~e~ director shall report such opinion to the board without delay, indicating the estimated amount of shortfall. The manager shall thereafter report to the board as to any remedial action ~~ ~~to or other steps recommended to be taken." Page 36 Line 13 "authorized by a majority of the qualified -.~ voters" Page 37 Line 5 "Such bonds or notes issued without authorization of a majority of the cualified voters shall be authorized" Page 38 Line 11 "It be~~ is the declared purpose" Page 40 Line 7 "the affirmative vote of a majority of all the members of the board. No member shall" Page 41 Line 6 "Judicial Circuit or anv successor established by the General Assembly. The Circuit Court" Line 17 "In like manner shall these provisions apply to the general district courts and iuvenile and domestic relations district courts of the City of Roanoke and the County of Roanoke, mutates mutandis. ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER ~ ~ `~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: December 19, 1989 AGENDA ITEM: Public Hearing for Citizen Input on the proposed Roanoke Metropolitan Government Charter COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Attached is a draft copy of the proposed charter of the Roanoke Metropolitan Government. This is one of two major documents on the proposed government. The charter provides the framework and guidelines under which the new government would operate. The other document is the proposed agreement. The agreement is a much more detailed document outlining the specifics of the Roanoke Metropolitan Government. The public hearing for the charter is being held at this time to satisfy the state requirement that charters be submitted to the General Assembly on or before the first day of the legislative session. A public hearing on the proposed agreement will be scheduled in January or February 1990. Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred To: ACTION Motion by: _ VOTE Yes No Abs Garrett Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers iz~_ .~ CHARTER OF THE ROANOKE METROPOLITAN GOVERNMENT DECEMBER 7, 1989 DRAFT /~.~ t - i TABLF OF CONTENTS Chapter 1. Incorporation ............................................... 1 § 1.01. Incorporation ..................................... 1 § 1.02. Ratification ...................................... 1 § 1.03. Repeal ......................................... 2 Chapter 2 Powers .................................................... 2 §2.01. Powers ......................................... 2 § 2.02. Taxing powers .................................... 2 § 2.03. Additional powers ................................. 4 § 2.04. Service districts and special tax districts .................. 5 § 2.05. Exercise of powers of former political subdivisions ........... 5 § 2.06. Franchises ...................................... 5 § 2.07. Transportation District ............................... 5 Chapter 3. Governing Body ............................................. 6 §3.01. Powers ......................................... 6 § 3.02. Additional powers .......~ .......................... 6 § 3.03. Composition ..................................... 6 § 3.04. Qualifications ..................................... 7 § 3.05. Election of the board; limited powers .................... 7 § 3.06. Vacancy ........................................ 8 § 3.07. Procedural powers ................................. 8 § 3.08. Office of the mayor ................................ 8 § 3.09. Investigations by board ............................. 9 § 3.10. Compensation .................................... 9 § 3.11. Limited purposes ................................. 10 § 3.12. Officers appointed by board ......................... 11 § 3.13. Limitations on board actions ......................... 11 Chapter 4. Metropolitan Manager ........................................ 12 § 4.01. Appointment; qualification ........................... 12 § 4.02. Powers and duties ................................ 12 Chapter 5. Departrnent of Finance ....................................... 14 § 5.01. Composition and functions .......................... 14 /~.~! § 5.02. Appointment; qualifications .......................... 15 § 5.03. General powers and duties .......................... 15 § 5.04. Certification of fundin4 ............................. 16 Chapter 6. Constitutional Officers ........................................ 17 § 6.01. Constitutional Officers Designated ..................... 17 § 6.02. Selection ...................................... 17 § 6.03. Election ....................................... 18 § 6.04. Elimination ..................................... 18 § 6.05. Commonwealth's attorney to prosecute violations ........... 18 Chapter 7. Personnel Rules and Regulations ................................ 19 § 7.01. Personnel system ................................ 19 § 7.02. System includes ................................. 19 § 7.03. Personnel director ................................ 19 Chapter 8. Arlminietratinn ----------- 19 § 8.01. Administrative departments .......................... 19 § 8.02. Department heads ................................ 20 § 8.03. Police Department ................................ 20 Chapter 9. Other Appointed Officers ...................................... 21 § 9.01. Officers appointed by board ......................... 21 § 9.02. Clerk ......................................... 21 § 9.03. Internal auditor .................................. 22 § 9.04. Real estate assessor .............................. 23 Chapter 10. Departrnerrt of Law .......................................... 23 § 10.01. Composition and functions ......................... 23 § 10.02. Appointment; term: qualification ...................... 23 § 10.03. General powers and duties ......................... 24 § 10.04. Authority as to deputies and other employees ............ 25 § 11.02. Functions of planning commission .................... 25 Chapter 11. Planning and Zoning ......................................... 25 § 11.01. Planning commission ............................. 25 § 11.03. Board of zoning appeals ........................... 26 Chapter 12 Department of Public Health .................................... 26 § 12.01. Composition ................................... 26 § 12.02. Functions ..................................... 26 § 12.03. Director of public health ........................... 26 Chapter 13. Department of Social Services .................................. 27 § 13.01. Composition ................................... 27 § 13.02. Functions ..................................... 27 § 13.03. Director of social services .......................... 27 § 13.04. Social services board ............................. 27 Chapter 14. Department of Education ...................................... 28 § 14.01. Composition ................................... 28 § 14.02. School Board .................................. 28 § 14.03. Superintendent ................................. 28 § 14.04. Management of schools ........................... 28 Chapter 15. Financial Administration .............~ .......................... 29 § 15.01. Treasurer ..................................... 29 § 15.02. Commissioner of revenue .......................... 29 § 15.03. Annual assessment of real estate ..................... 29 § 15.04. Annual audit ................................... 30 Chapter 16. Budget ................................................. 30 § 16.01. Fiscal year .................................... 30 § 16.02. Submission of operating budget ...................... 30 § 16.03. Operating budget message ......................... 30 § 16.04. Operating budget preparation ....................... 31 § 16.05. Board action on the operating budget ................. 32 § 16.06. Amendments after adoption of operating budget .......... 33 § 16.07. Lapse of appropriations ........................... 34 § 16.08. Ca~tal improvement program ....................... 34 § 16.09. Board action on capital improvement program ............ 34 Chapter 17. Borrowing ................................................ 35 §17.01. Power ....................................... 35 -2 ;~'-~ J § 17.02. Purposes for which bonds or notes may be issued ........ 35 § 17.03. Limitations on indebtedness ......................... 36 § 17.04. Form of bonds and notes .......................... 36 § 17.05. Authority for issuance of bonds ...................... 36 § 17.06. Payment of bonds and notes ........................ 37 Chapter 18. Irrtergovemmental Relationships ................................. 38 § 18.01. Towns ....................................... 38 Chapter 19. Power of Eminent Domain ..................................... 38 § 19.01. Powers ....................................... 38 § 19.02. Procedure ..................................... 38 Chapter 20. Ordinances ............................................... 39 § 20.01. Ordinances of the regional government ................. 39 Chapter 21. Miscellaneous ............ ................... 41 § 21.01. .............. Court of record .............. ................... 41 02 § 21 Notaries ................ ~ ... ................... 41 . . § 21 03 Amendments to charter ......... ................... 41 . . § 21.04. Immunity from liability .......... ................... 42 § 21.05. Severability ................. ................... 42 § 21.06. Assets and liabilities ........... ................... 42 § 21.07. Incorporation of new cities or towns• annexation immunity .... 42 IV 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 3 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 An Act to effectuate the consolidation of County of Roanoke and the City of Roanoke into Roanoke Metropolitan Government, a unit of general government organized as provided herein and deemed a regional government; and to this end to validate, ratify, and confirm the consolidation between County of Roanoke and the City of Roanoke; to provide a charter for the new Roanoke Metropolitan Government and to repeal Chapter 616 of the Acts of Assembly of 1986 and all amendments thereto which provided a charter for the County of Roanoke and the repeal Chapter 216 of the Acts of Assembly of 1952 and all amendments thereto which incorporated the City of Roanoke. Be it enacted by the General Assembly of Virginia: CHARTER OF THE ROANOKE METROPOLITAN GOVERNMENT Chapter 1. Incorporation § 1.01. Incorporation. The inhabitants of the territory comprised within the limits of the County of Roanoke and the City of Roanoke are hereby granted a charter with powers, duties, privileges and immunities as set forth herein. From and after the adoption of this charter, the County of Roanoke and the City of Roanoke shall become a regional government and identified as Roanoke Metropolitan Government, hereinafter called the regional government, a body corporate and politic. § 1.02 Ratfication. The consolidation of the County of Roanoke and the City of Roanoke into the Roanoke Metropolitan Government, a regional government which is a unit of general government as provided in the consolidation agreement to which reference is hereby made and which is made a part hereof, is hereby ratified, validated, and confirmed in all respects and such consolidation shall be effective on and after 1 ~ z 8~ - i 1 July 1, 1993, the effective date of this charter. 2 § 1.03. Repeal. Chapter 616 of the Acts of the Assemblv of 1986 and all 3 amendments thereto which provided a charter to the County of Roanoke and Chapter 4 216 of the Acts of Assemblv of 1952 and all amendments thereto which incorporated 5 the City of Roanoke are repealed as of midnight June 30, 1993. g Chapter 2 7 Powers. 8 9 § 201. Powers. Except as expressly restricted by this charter, the regional 10 government shall have and may exercise all powers which are now or may hereafter 11 be conferred upon or delegated to counties and cities under the Constitution or by the 12 laws of the Commonwealth and all such other powers pertinent to the conduct of a 3 county or city government which, in the opinion of the governing body, are necessary 14 to promote the general welfare of the regional government and the safety, health, 15 welfare, peace and good will of its inhabitants. No -enumeration of particular powers 16 in this charter shall be held to be exclusive but shall be held in addition to this general 17 grant of powers. There is hereby specifically conferred upon Roanoke Metropolitan 18 Government without further act all of the powers and authorities contained in §§ 15.1- 19 837 through 15.1-907 of the Code of Virginia, as now and hereafter to be amended not 20 inconsistent with this charter. All such powers and authorities shall be exercised insofar 21 as is consistent with the provisions of this charter. 22 § 202 Taxing powers. In addition to the powers granted by other sections of 2 /.~. ~~' 1 this charter and general law, the regional government shall have the power to raise 2 annually by taxes and assessments, as permitted and limited by general law, in the 3 regional government such sums of money as the governing body shall deem 4 necessary to pay the debts and defray the expenses of the regional government in 5 such manner as the governing body shall deem expedient. In addition to, but not as 6 a limitation upon this general grant of power, the regional government shall have 7 power: g (1) to levy and collect ad valorem taxes on real estate and tangible personal g property and machinery and tools; 1 p (2) to levy and collect taxes for admission to or other charge for any public 11 amusement, entertainment, performance, exhibition, sport or athletic event within the regional government, which taxes may be added to and 13 collected with the price of such admission or other charge; 14 (3) to levy and collect taxes on hotel and motel rooms; 15 (4) to levy and collect taxes on the sale of tobacco products; 16 (5) to levy and collect taxes on the sale of meals and beverages; 17 (6) to levy and collect privilege taxes, local general retail sales and use taxes 1 g as provided by law; 1 g (7) unless prohibited by law, to require licenses; prohibit the conduct of any 20 business, profession, vocation or calling without such license; require 21 taxes to be paid on such licenses in respect of all business, professions, ~ vocations and callings not exempted by prohibition of general law; 3 (8) to require licenses of all owners of vehicles of all kinds for the privilege of 2 using the streets, and other public places in the regional government, 3 require taxes to be paid on such licenses and prohibit the use of streets, 4 alleys, and other public places in the regional government without such 5 license; and g (9) to impose, levy, and collect, in such manner as its governing body may 7 deem expedient, a consumer or subscriber tax upon the amount paid for 8 the use of gas, electricity, telephone, cable television, and any other public 9 utility service within the regional government, or upon the amount paid for 10 any one or more of such public utility services, and may provide that such 11 tax shall be added to and collected with bills rendered consumers and . ~'~? subscribers for such services. 13 Any exemption or exception from a limitation or restriction upon the rate or 14 amount of any tax authorized for the City of Roanoke shall apply in like manner to the 15 Roanoke Metropolitan Government. 16 § 2Q3. Additional powers. In addition to the powers granted by other sections 17 of this charter, the regional government, upon a showing of public necessity, may 18 acquire property within or without its boundaries for any of its facilities or functions, in 19 fee simple, or lesser interest or estate, by purchase, gift, devise, bequest, 20 lease/purchase, or eminent domain, and may sell, lease, mortgage, pledge, hold, 21 manage, and control such property as the regional government's interest may require. 22 No judicial process need precede the exercise of these powers except for acquisition 4 ,,/~'J 't1rfv ~.'.f p 1 of property by eminent domain. 2 § 204. Service districts and special tax districts. The regional government may 3 create special service districts or areas within the regional government if those areas 4 desire additional or more complete governmental services than are desired in the 5 regional government as a whole. The governing body shall have the power to levy a 6 higher real property tax in such areas, and the proceeds therefrom shall be so 7 segregated as to enable the same to be expended in the areas in which raised. Such 8 higher real property tax rate shall not be levied for education, police, or general 9 governmental services. 10 The regional government may levy a tax on real property in any special taxing 11 district for a period not exceeding thirty (30) years which may be different from and in ' 2 addition to the general tax rate throughout the Roanoke Metropolitan Government for 13 the purpose of repaying indebtedness existing on the effective date of this charter and 14 chargeable to this special taxing district. 15 § 205. Exercise of powers of former pol"rtical subdivisions. To the extent that 16 it is not inconsistent with this charter, any special act applicable to the County of 17 Roanoke and the City of Roanoke prior to the effective date of this charter shall be 18 applicable to the Roanoke Metropolitan Government as successor to the County of 19 Roanoke and the City of Roanoke. 20 § 206. Franchises. The regional government may grant franchises to public 21 utilities and charge fees therefor, subject to the provisions of the Constitution Virginia. 22 § 207. Transportation District Roanoke Metropolitan Government is authorized 5 ~z~~-~ 1 to create a transportation district with the powers, functions and duties as provided in 2 Chapter 32 of Title 15.1 and by general law; and is authorized to levy a tax therefor 3 pursuant to the provisions of Article 4, Chapter 17 of Title 58.1 of the State Code. 4 5 6 Chapter 3. Governing Body 7 § 3.01. Powers. The powers of the regional government as a body politic and 8 corporate shall be vested in its governing body, which shall be known as the board of 9 commissioners. 10 § 3.02 Additional powers. The board shall be the policy-determining body of 11 the regional government and shall be vested with all rights and powers conferred on 12 governing bodies of cities and counties by general law not inconsistent with this .3 chapter. 14 The board shall provide for the performance of all governmental functions of the 15 regional government and to that end shall provide for and establish all departments of 16 government that it deems necessary, not inconsistent with the provisions of this charter. 17 The board shall have the power to raise annually by excise and ad valorem taxes and 18 assessments on property, persons and other subjects of taxation, which are not 19 prohibited by law, such sums of money as in the judgment of the board are necessary 20 to pay the debts, defray the expenses, accomplish the purposes and perform the 21 functions of the regional government. 22 § 3.03. Composition. The board shall consist of eleven (11) members. Two 6 1 members shall be elected by and from the regional government at large, a mayor and 2 vice mayor. Of the remaining nine (9) members, one (1) member shall be elected from 3 each election district of the regional government. The board may redistrict or change 4 the number or manner of electing members of its board in accordance with general law 5 without the necessity of amending this charter. 6 § 3.04. Qualifications. Members of the board shall be qualified voters of that 7 election district, reside therein, and be selected by the qualified voters thereof. The 8 mayor and vice mayor shall be elected from the regional government at large, shall be 9 a qualified voter of that regional government, reside therein, and shall be elected by the 10 qualified voters thereof. 11 § 3.05. Election of the board• limited powers. The board of the Roanoke 12 Metropolitan Government shall be elected at a special election as ordered by the circuit 13 court (pursuant to § 15.1-1141 and § 24.1-88 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as 14 amended), which the parties intend shall be on November 5, 1991, and shall take office 15 for certain limited purposes specified in § 3.11 of this chapter upon their qualification, 16 but not earlier than January 1, 1992, and for all purposes as of the effective date of 17 consolidation for the terms herein specified. 18 The terms of the vice mayor of the board and four (4) members from election 19 districts shall commence July 1, 1993, and expire June 30, 1995. The terms of the 20 mayor and the other five (5) members from election districts shall commence July 1, 21 1993, and expire June 30, 1997. Thereafter, the members of the board shall be 22 elected biennially in May of odd-numbered years for four (4) year terms commencing 7 1 on the first day of July. /„~ ~,~ 2 § 3.06. Vacan_ c_y, In the event a vacancy occurs on the board, it shall be filled 3 by the remaining members of the board within thirty (30) days of such vacancy, and 4 if as much as two (2) years of any unexpired term of a member of the board or the 5 mayor or the vice mayor remains at the time of the next regular board election, a 6 board member shall be elected at said election for the remaining portion of such 7 unexpired term. The person appointed to fill the vacancy shall be a qualified voter of 8 the election district in which the vacancy occurred and shall hold office until the 9 qualified voters shall fill the same by election, and the person so elected shall have 10 qualified. If a majority of the remaining members cannot agree or do not act, then the 11 judges of the circuit court of the Roanoke Metropolitan Government shall make the 12 appointment in accordance with the Code of Vir inia. 13 § 3.07. Procedural powers. The board shall have the power, subject to the 14 provisions of this charter, to adopt its own rules of procedure. Such rules shall provide 15 for the time and place of holding regular meetings of the board, which shall not be less 16 frequent than once a month. The rules of the board shall provide for the calling of 17 special meetings by any two or more members of the board or the chief executive 18 officer and shall prescribe the methods of giving notice thereof. A majority of the 19 board shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of business. 20 § 3.08. Office of the mayor. The mayor shall have the power to administer an 21 oath to any person concerning any matter submitted to the board or connected with 22 its powers or duties. 8 1 The mayor shall preside over the meetings of the board, shall represent the 2 Roanoke Metropolitan Government at official functions and ceremonial events; except 3 as hereinabove stated, the mayor shall have the same rights, privileges and duties as 4 other members of the board. The mayor shall be recognized by the courts for the 5 purpose of serving civil process and by the Governor for military or other emergency 6 purposes. The mayor may execute all contracts or other legal instruments in writing 7 for and on behalf of the regional government and shall perform all other functions or 8 requirements arising from federal or state law. The vice mayor shall preside in the 9 absence of the mayor; except as hereinabove stated, the vice mayor shall have the 10 same rights, privileges and duties as other members of the board. 11 § 3.09. Investigations by board. The board shall have the right to make such ~ ? investigations relating to the financial affairs and internal operations of the regional . 13 government as they may deem necessary. The provisions of § 15.1-801 of the Code 14 of Virginia shall apply, mutatis mutandis. 15 § 3.10. Compensation. The board shall establish the salary, not to exceed 16 Thirteen Thousand Dollars ($13,000) per annum, and allowances of its members 17 provided that no increase in such salary shall be effective until: 1 g 1. A public hearing shall be held on the salaries to be established; and 1 g 2. The adoption of an ordinance establishing the salary of its members for 20 the ensuing fiscal year not to exceed the limits established by general law. This 21 maximum annual salary may be adjusted by ordinance in any year or years by an 22 inflation factor not to exceed five (5%) percent. 9 1 3. The establishment of said salary shall occur not earlier than May 1 nor 2 later than June 30 of each year. 3 In addition the board may fix annually by ordinance an additional sum to be paid 4 to the mayor and vice mayor in an amount not to exceed Eighteen Hundred ($1,800) 5 Dollars and Twelve Hundred ($1,200) Dollars, respectively, without regard to the 6 maximum salary limits. 7 § 3.11. Limited purposes. The members of the board shall serve for an initial 8 term commencing upon their qualification, but not earlier than January 1, 1992, for 9 certain limited purposes until the effective date of consolidation, July 1, 1993. These 10 limited purposes are as follows: 11 (1) Appointment of the chief executive officer of Roanoke Metropolitan ~ Government and such other officers, board and commissions of Roanoke 13 Metropolitan Government as are to be appointed by such board pursuant 14 to its charter; 15 (2) Preparation and approval of a budget for the Fiscal Year beginning July 16 1, 1993, and ending June 30, 1994; 1 ~ (3) Adoption of ordinances to be effective upon the date of consolidation; 1 g (4) Negotiation, preparation and approval of contracts, leases, franchises or 1 g other documents required by this charter or otherwise deemed advisable; 20 (5) Review of the consolidation plan recommended by the Consolidation 21 Transition Team; ~ (6) Preparation and approval of a budget for these limited purposes, to be 10 ~- / funded by the County of Roanoke and the City of Roanoke; and __ 1 authorization to expend such funds as may be appropriated to it; and 2 7) Completion of the orderly transition into a new regional unit of local 3 ~ 4 government. § 312. pfficers appointed by board. The board shall appoint a chief executive 5 officer, a clerk, a director of finance, an attorney, an internal auditor, and a real estate 6 assessor. The board shall establish the powers, duties, and responsibilities of these 7 officers. The board shall fix the compensation for these officers. Each officer shall 8 serve for a term of two (2) years or until his successor shall have been appointed and 9 ualified. These officers need not be residents of the regional government at the time 10 q of their appointment but must become an actual resident and in due course a bona 11 ~ fide resident of the regional government. In the case of the absence or disability of 2 13 any of these officers or a vacancy in the office, the board may designate some res onsible person without regard to residence on an interim basis to perform the 14 P duties of the office and fix the compensation, 'rf any, for the person so designated. The 15 1 g board shall also appoint the members of such boards and commissions as are 17 hereafter provided for. § 3.13. Limitations on board actions. Neither the board nor any of its members 18 shall direct the appointment or removal of any person from any office or employment 19 b the manager or by that officer's subordinates, nor interfere with the manager in the 20 Y 21 exercise of his judgment. Except for the purpose of inquiry, the members of the board shall deal with the 22 11 i~ .- 1 administrative service solely through the manager, and no member of the board shall 2 give orders to nor direct any of the subordinates of the manager. 3 No member of the board of commissioners shall, during the term for which 4 elected and for one year following the expiration of such term, be appointed manager. 5 Chapter 4. g Metropolitan Manager 7 g § 4.01. An~ointment• ctualfication. The board shall appoint a manager who 9 shall be the chief executive officer and chief administrative officer of the regional 10 government. The manager shall be chosen solely on the basis of executive and 11 administrative qualifications and without regard to political beliefs and shall serve at the 2 pleasure of the board. Removal of the manager shall require a vote of the majority of 13 all of the members of the board. The board shall fix the compensation of the manager. 14 The manager shall devote his full time to the work and service of the regional 15 government under the direction of the board of commissioners to whom he shall be 16 accountable. He shall be appointed with regard to merit only and need not be a 17 resident of the regional government at the time of his appointment but must become 18 an actual resident and in due course a bona fide resident of the regional government. 1 g § 4.02 Powers and duties. The manager shall have the following powers and 20 the duties: 21 1. To exercise all of the powers and duties prescribed by § 15.1-117 of the, 22 Code of Virginia, 1950, as now or hereafter may be amended and to delegate the 12 ~.. ..~ ~' 1 powers, duties, or responsibilities to such other person or persons as are deemed 2 appropriate; 3 2. To designate an officer or employee of the regional government to 4 exercise the powers and perform the duties of the metropolitan manager during the 5 manager's temporary absence or disability; the board may revoke such designation at 6 any time and appoint another officer of the regional government to serve until the 7 manager returns; g 3. To appoint and remove a department head, deputy and assistant 9 managers within funds appropriated by the board for each department of the regional 10 government, except for the superintendent or department heads for the departments 11 of education, public health, and the officers appointed by the board as provided in § ? 3.12 of this charter, with each department head to serve at the pleasure of the 13 manager; 14 4. To appoint and, when necessary for the good of service, suspend or 15 remove all employees of the regional government and appointive administrative officers 16 provided for by or under this charter, except as otherwise provided for by law, this 17 charter or personnel rules adopted pursuant to this charter; 1 g 5. To direct and supervise the administration of all departments, offices, and 19 agencies of the regional government, except as otherwise provided by this charter or 20 by general law; 21 6. To attend all meetings of the board of commissioners with the right to 22 take part in the discussion but shall not vote; 13 1 7. To see that all laws, provisions of this charter, and ordinances of the 2 board of commissioners, subject to enforcement by the manager or by officers subject 3 to the manager's direction and supervision, are faithfully executed; 4 8. To prepare and submit the annual budget and capital program to the 5 board of commissioners; g 9. To submit to the board of commissioners and make available to the public 7 a yearly complete report of the administrative activities of the regional government at 8 the end of each fiscal year; g 10. To make such other reports as the board of commissioners may require 10 concerning the operations of the regional government's departments, offices, and 11 agencies subject to the manager's direction and supervision; 2 11. To make recommendations to the board of commissioners concerning the 13 operations of the regional government; and 14 12. To perform such other duties and to exercise such other powers as may 15 be imposed or conferred by the board of commissioners. 16 Chapter 5. 1 ~ Department of Finance 18 1 g § 5.01. Composition and functions. The department of finance shall consist of 20 the director of finance, who shall be the head of the department of finance, and such 21 deputy and such other employees as may be authorized by the board and appointed 22 by the director of finance. 14 1 § 502 Anooirrtment• qualfications. The board shall appoint the director of 2 finance who shall be a person skilled in governmental financial management, 3 accounting and financial controls and shall have charge of the financial affairs of the 4 regional government. The compensation of the director of finance shall be fixed by the 5 board. g § 5.03. General powers and duties. The director of finance shall: 7 1. Have charge and shall maintain control of the keeping of all accounts and g financial records of the regional government, in accordance with generally-accepted g accounting principles. 10 2. Be charged with and shall exercise a general fiscal supervision over all the 11 officers, departments, offices, agencies, and employees of the regional government 2 ~ charged in any manner with the assessment, receipt, collection, or disbursement of 13 metropolitan revenues, and with the collection and return of such revenues into the 14 metropolitan treasury; and he shall prescribe such systems and regulations as is 15 necessary for the proper reporting and accounting for all metropolitan revenue and 16 receipts. 1 ~ 3. Examine and audit all accounts, claims and demands for or against the 1 g regional government, and, unless otherwise provided by law or by this chapter, no 19 money shall be drawn from the treasury or be paid by the regional government to any 20 person unless the balance due and payable be certified by the said director of finance. 21 4. Draw the proper financial instrument on the treasury for such money as is ~ determined by him to be due and payable to any person, stating the particular fund or 15 /~.. ~ - /" 1 appropriation to which the same is chargeable and the person to whom payable and 2 no money shall be drawn from the treasury except by proper financial instrument of the 3 director of finance, countersigned by the metropolitan manager; the director of finance 4 shall not issue payment of any money in excess of the appropriation on account of 5 which such money is drawn. g 5. Be authorized to require all officers in receipt of regional government funds 7 to submit reports with required support documents on a daily, weekly or monthly basis, 8 or at such times as may be otherwise provided by ordinance; and if any such officer g shall neglect to make adjustment of his accounts when required and to pay over such 1 p moneys as required, to issue notice in writing, directed to such officer, and take other 11 appropriate actions to ensure all regional government moneys are properly accounted 2 for. 1 g 6. Prepare an annual report, at the end of each fiscal year, giving full and 14 detailed statement of all receipts and expenditures during the year. 15 7. Be the chief administrative officer of the Roanoke Metropolitan Government 16 Pension Plan and serve as ex-officio on such board. 1 ~ 8. Perform such other duties and exercise such other powers as may be 18 imposed or conferred by the board of commissioners. 19 § 5.04. Certification of funding. No contract, agreement or other obligation 20 involving the expenditure of money shall be entered into nor shall any ordinance of the 21 board or order of any officer of the regional government authorizing the government's 22 obligation for expenditure of money be effective until and unless the director of finance 16 /.~ ~` ~ 0 1 or his designee has certified that such monies required for such contract, agreement, 2 obligation, or expenditure is available for such purpose. 3 Chapter 6. 4 Constitutional Officers 5 6 § 6.01. Constitutional Officers Designated. On the effective date of this charter, 7 the commonwealth's attorney, clerk of circuit court, sheriff, treasurer, and commissioner g of the revenue of the City of Roanoke and the County of Roanoke shall continue in g office pursuant to § 5.03 at not less than their salaries in effect at the effective date of 10 such consolidation. 11 § 6.02 Selection. Selection of such constitutional officers for the Roanoke 12 Metropolitan Government shall be made by agreement between those persons holding 3 the respective constitutional offices in the County of Roanoke and the City of Roanoke, 14 and the other person shall become the assistant or chief deputy. The agreement 15 certifying the selection of each constitutional officer shall be filed with the circuit court 16 and approved by the court at least six (6) months prior to the effective date of 17 consolidation. In the event that no agreement is reached or no certification is filed 1 g within the specified time limit, the circuit court shall designate one officer as principal 19 and the other as assistant or chief deputy. In the event of a vacancy in the office of 20 assistant or chief deputy created during such term, the position shall be abolished. 21 Each officer, whether principal, chief deputy or assistant, shall continue in office until 22 December 31, 1995, whether or not the term to which that officer was elected may 17 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 have expired prior to that date. § 6,03, Election. Constitutional officers for the Roanoke Metropolitan Government shall be elected on November 7, 1995, to take office January 1, 1996, except for the clerk of the circuit court, who shall be elected November 2, 1999, to take office January 1, 2000. § 6,04. Elimination. The constitutional offices of sheriff, treasurer, commissioner of revenue and commonwealth's attorney for the City of Roanoke shall be eliminated upon the conclusion of their terms of office on December 31, 1993; provided, however, the incumbent constitutional officers of the city may continue to serve as constitutional 10 officer, assistant or chief deputy until December 31, 1995, pursuant to § 5.03. The 11 constitutional office of the clerk of the circuit court of the City of Roanoke shall be ~ eliminated upon the conclusion of its term of office on December 31, 1995. i 3 There shall be no merger nor abolishment of any of the constitutional offices in 14 existence at the effective date of the charter, except upon an affirmative vote of the 15 qualified voters of the regional government at a referendum upon such question as 16 provided by general law. 17 § 6.05. Commonwealth's attomey to prosecute violations. The Commonwealth's 1 g attorney shall prosecute the violations of all ordinances of Roanoke Metropolitan 1 g Government, both in the general district court and upon appeal, and shall notify the 20 metropolitan attorney in all such prosecutions in which the validity of an ordinance of 21 the regional government is attacked. 22 18 / .2 ~"' ~ 1 1 2 3 Chapter 7. Personnel Rules and Regulations 4 § 7.01. Personnel system. A personnel system shall be established by the 5 board of commissioners for administrative officials and employees. Such a system 6 shall provide that appointment and promotion shall be based on merit and fitness alone 7 without regard for race, national origin, religion, handicap, sex or political affiliation. 8 § 7.02 System includes. The personnel system shall include a classification 9 plan for service, a staff development plan, a uniform pay plan and a procedure for 10 resolving grievances for employees of the board. Employees of constitutional officers 11 and other agencies may participate in the personnel system at the discretion of the 12 board and upon the concurrence of the constitutional officer. ,, § 7.03. Personnel director. There shall be a personnel director appointed by 14 the manager as provided in § 7.02 who shall administer the personnel system of the 15 regional government under the general direction of the manager. The department of 16 personnel shall be responsible to the manager for the formulation and administration 17 of the personnel policies of the regional government. 18 19 20 Chapter 8. Administration 21 § 8.01. Administrative departments. The board of commissioners may establish 22 and create departments, offices, or agencies in addition to those created by this 23 charter and may prescribe the functions of all departments, offices, and agencies, 19 a,,.s' °° ~-~ `}~' / 1 except that no function assigned by this charter to a particular department, office, or 2 agency may be discontinued or, unless this charter specifically so provides, assigned 3 to any other. The board may combine or abolish existing departments and distribute 4 the functions thereof or establish temporary departments for special work to the extent 5 not inconsistent with this charter. 6 § 8.02 Department heads. There shall be a department head who shall 7 administer each department. Each department head of each department shall be 8 appointed by the manager and shall be subject to the general supervision of the g manager. 10 § 8.03. Police Departrnerrt. The police department shall be composed of a chief 11 of police and of such officers, patrolmen and other employees as the board may 2 determine. The chief of police shall have the immediate direction and control of said 13 department, subject to the supervision of the manager and to such rules, regulations, 14 and orders as the manager may prescribe. 15 The officers constituting this department shall be, and hereby are, invested with 16 all of the power and authority which pertains to the office of constable at common law 17 in taking cognizance of and enforcing the criminal laws of the Commonwealth and the 1 g ordinances and regulations of the regional government. Each member of this 1 g department shall, before entering upon the duties of his office, take and subscribe an 20 oath before the clerk of the regional government that he will faithfully perform the duties 21 of this office. 22 20 s.~~`~ 1 Chapter 9. 2 Other Appointed Officers 3 q § 9.01. Officers ap~i~~ by board. Pursuant to the provisions of § 3.12 of this charter, the board shall appoint a clerk, an internal auditor, and a real estate 5 g assessor. The powers, duties, and responsibilities of these offers shall be as provided 7 for herein, and such other powers and duties as shall be required by ordinance g adopted by the board. 9 § 9.02 Clerk. The clerk shall have the following powers and duties: 10 1. To function as clerk to the board of commissioners; 11 2. To keep a record of the proceedings of the board and to keep all books and 12 papers as required by this charter or as directed by the board; 3 3. To attend all meetings of the board; 14 4. To keep the seal of the regional government and to affix and attest the same 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 as so directed by the board; 5. To transmit copies of all resolutions or ordinances to the parties affected thereby and to inform parties of the board's final actions on communications, requests or petitions; 6, To publish or cause to be published reports, ordinance or documents as required by this charter or as directed by the board; and 7, To perform such other duties as shall be required by ordinance adopted by the board. 21 1 In the performance of the foregoing duties the clerk may appoint a deputy and such 2 assistants and other employees as may be authorized by the board. g § 9.03. Irrtemal auditor. The internal auditor shall be appointed by the board 4 and serve at its pleasure. The internal auditor shall have such qualifications as the 5 board shall from time to time establish and shall appoint such assistant auditors and g other employees as may be authorized by the board. The powers and duties of the 7 internal auditor shall be as follows: g A. To examine and audit all accounts, books, and records of the regional g government involving its financial transactions; ~ p B. To work closely with the director of finance to promulgate systems and 11 procedures in accounting for revenues and expenditures; C. To examine and audit all recommended systems established by ~ g independent public accountants making audits for regional government ~ 4 functions; . ~ 5 D. To report immediately in writing to the manager and to the board of ~ g commissioners any unauthorized, illegal, or irregular act or practice he ~ 7 discovers affecting or involving public funds or the financial affairs of the ~ g regional government; and 19 E. To perform such other duties as shall be required by ordinance adopted 20 by the board. 21 In the performance of the foregoing duties the internal auditor shall have access at any 22 and all times to all books, records, and accounts of each department, office, agency, 22 ,~ . 3 -- ~ .1 officer, or employee of the regional government subject to examination or audit by him. 2 § g 04. Real estate assessor. The board shall appoint an assessor or 3 assessors to assess or reassess for taxation the real estate within the regional 4 government and shall prescribe the duties of such assessor. The assessor shall 5 appoint such assistant assessors and other employees as may be authorized by the g board. Such assessor shall make assessments and reassessments on the same basis 7 as real estate is required to be assessed under the provisions of general law. He shall g have the same authority as the assessors appointed under the provisions of general g law, and shall be charged with duties imposed upon such assessors, except that such 1 p assessments or reassessment may be made annually, and the assessments and 11 reassessments so made shall have the same effect as if they had been made by assessors appointed under the provisions of general law. The assessor or an assistant 13 assessor may be required to attend meetings of the board of equalization. 14 Chapter 10. 15 Department of Law 16 17 § 10.01. Composition and functions. The department of law shall consist of the 1 g metropolitan attorney, who shall be the head of the Department of Law, and such 1 g deputy and assistant metropolitan attorneys and such other employees as may be 20 authorized by the board and appointed by the metropolitan attorney. 21 § 10.02 Appointment- term' Qual'fication. The board shall appoint the 22 metropolitan attorney, who shall be an attorney at law licensed to practice law in the 23 ~z~-~ 1 Commonwealth of Vrginia, and who shall serve at the pleasure of the board. The 2 compensation of the metropolitan attorney shall be fixed by the board. 3 § 10.03. General powers and duties. The metropolitan attorney shall: 4 (1) Be the chief legal advisor of and attorney and counsel for the board, the 5 metropol'~tan manager and all departments, boards, commissions, and 6 agencies of the regional government in all matters affecting the interests ~ of the regional government; $ (2) Upon request of the board, the metropolitan manager or any officer, 9 board, or commission, furnish his opinion on any question of law involving 10 their respective official powers and duties; 11 (3) Prepare or review all ordinances and resolutions presented to the board, . - ~_ and, at the request of the board or any member thereof, examine ordinances after introduction and offer an opinion as to the form and 13 14 legality thereof; (4) Draw or approve as to form deeds, leases, contracts, franchises, or other 15 instruments to which the regional government is a parry or in which it has 16 17 an interest; 18 (5) Institute and prosecute all legal proceedings that he shall deem necessary 19 to protect the interests of the regional government and defend all suits, 20 actions, and legal proceedings against the regional government; 21 (6) Control and direct legal services performed by special counsel for the ~ regional government who may be employed from time-to-time to assist the 24 1 metropolitan attomey in the provision of legal services to the government; 2 (7) Have the management and control of all law business of the regional 3 government and the departments thereof or in which the regional 4 government has an interest; and 5 (g) Perform such other duties as may be required of him by ordinance. 6 § 1004. Authority as to deputies and other employees. The metropolitan 7 attorney may appoint and remove deputy and assistant metropolitan attorneys and g other employees. He may authorize deputy and assistant metropolitan attorneys or g special counsel to perform any of the duties imposed upon the metropolitan attorney 1 p by this charter. 11 Chapter 11. . ~ Planning and Zoning .3 14 § 11.01. Planning commission. There shall be a regional government planning 15 commission which shall consist of not less than seven (7) nor more than eleven (11) 16 members and shall be appointed and organized as provided by general law. All 17 members of the commission shall be qualified voters of the regional government and 1 g shall be appointed by the board for terms of four (4) years. 19 § 11.02 Functions of planning commission. The planning commission shall be 20 responsible for making recommendations to the board of commissioners on all phases 21 of regional government planning, including a comprehensive plan, zoning, and 22 subdivision control. It shall have the powers and duties provided by general law and 25 / 2 ~~! -- ~ 1 such other powers and duties as may be assigned by the board of commissioners. 2 § 11.03. Board of zoning appeals. There shall be a board of zoning appeals 3 appointed by the board of commissioners. The board of zoning appeals shall consist 4 of five members each to be appointed for a term of five (5) years so that the term of 5 one member shall expire each year. Members shall have the qualifications and 6 exercise the powers and perform the duties as provided by general law. 7 Chapter 12 $ Department of Public Health 9 10 § 12.01. Composition. The department of public health shall consist of the 11 director of public health and such other officers and employees organized into such 12 units as may be provided by the orders of the director consistent therewith. § 1202 Functions. The department of public health shall be responsible for the 14 exercise of all health functions imposed on counties and cities by general law and such 15 other powers and duties as may be assigned by the board of commissioners. 16 § 1203. Director of public health. The head of the department of public health 17 shall be the director of public health, who shall be a physician licensed to practice 1 g medicine in the Commonwealth. The director shall have general management and 19 control of the several units of the department and shall have all the powers and duties 20 with respect to the preservation of the public health which are conferred or imposed 21 on health officers by the laws of the Commonwealth. 22 26 1 Chapter 13. 2 pepartment of Social Services 3 4 § 13.01. Composition. The department of social services shall consist of the 5 director of social services, a social services board, and such officers and employees g organized in such units as may be provided by the order of the director consistent 7 therewith. g § 13.02 Functions. The department of social services shall be responsible for g the duties imposed by the laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia relating to public 1 p assistance and relief of the poor and such other powers and duties as may be 11 assigned by the board of commissioners or the social services board. 12 § 13.03. Director of social services. The head of the department shall be the director of social services, who shall be appointed by the manager. The director shall J 14 have general management and control of the divisions of the department, subject to 15 the supervision of the manager and to such rules; regulations and orders as the 1 g manager may prescribe. 17 § 13.04. Social services board. The social services board shall consist of three 1 g members appointed by the board of commissioners to serve terms of four (4) years. 1 g The board shall generally elect its own chairman and vice-chairman. In addition to 20 regularly scheduled meetings, it may meet at the call of the chairman or on the petition 21 of at least two of the members. ~ The social services board shall have the authority to recommend rules and 27 /,2 X31 1 regulations not in conflict with this charter or general law concerning such department. 2 Chapter 14. 3 Department of Education 4 5 § 14.0. Composition. The department of education shall consist of a school 6 board for the regional government, superintendent of schools, and the officers and 7 employees thereof. The school board and the superintendent of schools shall exercise 8 all the powers conferred and perform all the duties imposed upon them by general law 9 in a manner consistent with this charter. 10 § 14.02 School Board. The school board for the regional government shall be 11 composed of nine (9) members, one from each election district of the regional 12 government, who shall be appointed by the board of commissioners of the regional s government for four (4) year terms. The school board shall elect annually its own 14 chairman and vice-chairman. 15 § 14.03. Superintendent The superintendent shall have all the powers and 16 duties as may be fixed for superintendents by the State Board of Education and by 17 general law. 18 § 14.04. Management of schools. The administration of the public school 1 g system shall remain the responsibility of the school board in accordance with the 20 Constitution and general laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia. 21 22 28 /.2~ ~- /' 1 Chapter 15. 2 Fnancia! Admin'~stration 3 4 § 15.01. Tre_ The treasurer shall collect and receive all regional 5 government taxes and other revenues or monies accruing to the regional government, g except such as the board may by ordinance make it the duty of some other person to 7 collect and shall have such other powers and duties as shall be required by ordinance g adopted by the board. g § 15.02 Commissioner of revenue. The commissioner of revenue shall perform 10 such duties as required with the laws of the Commonwealth in relation to the 11 assessment of property and licenses and such other duties as shall be required by 12 ordinance adopted by the board. § 15.03. Annual assessment of real estate. A. The board may, in lieu of the 14 methods prescribed by general law, provide by ordinance for the annual assessment 15 and reassessment and equalization of assessments of real estate for local taxation. 16 g. The circuit court shall appoint a board of equalization of real estate 17 assessments to be composed of not less than three (3) nor more than five (5) 1 g members who shall be freeholders of the regional government. The terms of such 1 g members shall commence on the date of their appointment as provided by court order. 20 The court may extend the terms of the members of the board and shall fill any vacancy 21 therein for the unexpired term. Such board of equalization shall have and may ~ exercise the powers to revise, correct, and amend any assessment of real estate and 29 /..2 '- ~ 1 to that end shall have all powers conferred upon boards of equalization by general law. 2 The provisions of general law, notwithstanding, however, the board of equalization may 3 adopt any regulations providing for the oral presentation, with formal petitions or other 4 pleadings or request for review, and looking to the further facilitation and simplification 5 of proceedings before the board. This section shall not apply to assessment of any g real estate assessable by the State Corporation Commission. 7 § 15.04. Annual audit. The board shall cause to be made an independent audit g of the regional government's finances at the end of each fiscal year by the auditor of g public accounts of the Commonwealth or by a firm of independent certified public 10 accountants to be selected by the board. One copy of the report of such audit shall 11 be always available for public inspection in the office of the clerk during regular 2 business hours. 13 Chapter 16. 14 Budget 15 16 § 16.01. Fiscal year. The fiscal year of the regional government shall begin on 17 the first day of July and shall end on the last day of June of each calendar year. Such 1 g fiscal year shall also constitute the budget and accounting year. 1 g § 16.02 Submission of operating budget. The manager shall submit to the 20 board an operating budget and a budget message on or before last day of April of 21 each fiscal year. ~ § 16.03. Operafing budget messa~. The manager's message shall explain the 30 budget in fiscal terms. It shall contain the recommendations of the manager 2 concerning the fiscal policy of the regional government for the ensuing fiscal year, 3 describe the important features of the budget, indicate any major changes from the 4 current year in financial policies, expenditures, and revenues together with the reasons 5 for such changes, and include such other materials as the manager deems desirable. 6 ~ 16.0,4. Opera*~^~ budget preparation. The budget shall provide a financial 7 plan for the ensuing fiscal year and shall be in such form as the manager deems g advisable or the board may require. In organizing the budget, the manager shall utilize g the most feasible combination of expenditures classification by fund, organization urnt, 10 rogram, purpose or activity and object. It shall be prepared in accordance with P 11 enerally accepted principles of municipal accounting and budgeting procedures and 9 techniques. It shall be the duty of the head of each department, the judges of the . courts of record and courts not of record, each constitutional officer, each board or 13 14 commission, including the school board, and each other office or agency supported in whole or in part by the regional government, to file at such time as the manager may 15 16 rescribe estimates of revenue and expenditure for that department, court, board, P 17 commission, office or agency for the ensuing fiscal year. The manager shall hold such 1 g hearings as deemed advisable and shall review the estimates and other data pertinent 19 to the preparation of the budget and make such revisions in such estimates as 20 deemed proper, subject to the laws of the Commonwealth relating to the obligatory 21 expenditures for any purpose, except that in the case of the school board may ~ recommend a revision only in its major classifications established by law. In no event 31 /~~~/ 1 shall the expenditures recommended by the manager in the budget exceed the 2 revenues estimated, unless the manager shall recommend an increase in the rate of ad 3 valorem taxes on real estate and tangible personal property or other new or increased 4 fees, charges, or taxes or licenses within the power of the regional government to levy 5 and collect in the ensuing year, the revenue from which, estimated on the average 6 experience with the same or similar taxes during the three tax years last past will make 7 up the difference. If estimated expenditures exceed estimated revenues, the manager 8 may recommend revisions in the tax and license ordinances of the regional government g in order to bring the budget into balance. 10 The manager shall introduce and recommend to the board an appropriation 11 ordinance which shall be based on the approved budget before the end of the fiscal year. The manager shall also introduce at the same time any ordinances levying a new r 13 tax or altering the rate on any existing tax necessary to balance the budget as 14 provided in this section. 15 § 16.05. Board action on the operating budget. A. Notice and hearing. The 16 board shall publish in one or more newspapers of general circulation in the regional 17 government the general summary of the proposed budget and a notice stating: 18 1. The times and places where copies of the message and budget are 1 g available for inspection by the public; and 20 2. The time and place, not less than fourteen (14) days after such 21 publication, for a public hearing on the budget. ~ B. Amendment before adoption. After the public hearing, the board may 32 i.2 ~- 1 adopt the budget with or without amendment. In amending the budget, it may add or 2 increase programs or amounts, except expenditures required by law or for debt 3 service, and except further that in the case of the school board, the board may only 4 revise the major classifications. In no case shall the board increase the authorized 5 expenditures to an amount greater than the total of estimated revenues. 6 C. Adoption. The board shall adopt the budget by the vote of at least a 7 majority of all members of the board not later May 15 of the current fiscal year. In no g event shall the board adopt a budget in which the estimated total of expenditures g exceeds revenues, unless at the same time it adopts measures to provide additional 10 revenues estimated to be sufficient to make up the difference. The board shall adopt 11 an ordinance appropriating the amounts specified in the adopted budget from the ~? funds indicated and an ordinance levying the taxes therein proposed on or before the 13 end of the fiscal year. 14 § 16.06. Amendments after adoption of operating budget. A. Supplemental 15 appropriations. If during the fiscal year the director of finance certifies that there are 16 funds available in excess of those estimated in the budget, the board by ordinance 17 may make supplemental appropriations for the year up to the amount of such excess. 1 g B. Reduction of appropriations. If at any time during the fiscal year it appears 19 probable to the manager that the revenues available will be insufficient to meet the 20 amount appropriated, the manager shall report to the board without delay, indicating 21 the estimated amount of shortfall, any remedial action taken by the manager and 22 recommendations as to any other steps to be taken. The board shall then take such 33 /. .~ -~ ~ 1 further action as it deems necessary to prevent or minimize any shortfall and it may by r ro riations. 2 ordinance reduce one or more app p 3 § 16.07. Lapse of appropriations. Every appropriation, except an appropriation 4 for a project in the capital improvement program, shall lapse at the close of the fiscal 5 year to the extent that it has not been expended or encumbered. An appropriation for 6 a project in the capital improvement program shall continue in force until the purpose 7 for which it was made has been accomplished or abandoned. g § 16.08. Capital improvement procaram. A. Submission to board. The manager g shall prepare and submit to the board afive-year capital improvement program as 10 required by the board. 11 B. Contents. The capital improvement program shall include: . .,, 1. A general summary of its contents; 2. A list of all capital improvements which are proposed to be 13 14 undertaken during the five fiscal years next ensuing, with appropriate supporting 15 information as to the necessity for such improvements; 16 3. Cost estimates, methods of financing, and recommended time 17 schedules for each such improvement; and 18 4. The estimated annual cost of operating and maintaining the facilities 19 to be constructed or acquired. 20 The above information shall be revised and extended each year with regard to 21 capital projects still pending. ~ § 16,09. Board action on capital improvement pr~• A• Notice and hearing. 34 1 The board shall publish in one or more newspapers of general circulation in the 2 regional government the general summary of the capital improvement program and a 3 notice stating: 4 1. The times and places where copies of the capital improvement 5 program are available for inspection by the public; and 2. The time and place, not less than fourteen {14) days after such 6 7 publication, for a public hearing on the capital improvement program. $ B. Adoption. The board shall adopt a capital improvement program with or g without amendment after the public hearing on or before the end of each fiscal year. 10 The capital improvement program, after adoption, shall be deemed a plan only, with the 11 right being reserved to the board to change the same at any time. ~ Chapter 17. Borrowing 13 14 15 § 17.01. Power. The board may, in the name •of and for the use of the regional 16 government, incur indebtedness by issuing its negotiable bonds or notes for the 17 purpose, in the manner and to the extent provided in this chapter. 18 § 17.02 Purposes for which bonds or notes may be issued. Bonds, and notes 1 g in anticipation of bonds when the issuance of bonds has been authorized as 20 hereinafter provided, may be issued for any purpose for which cities, counties or 21 regional governments are authorized to issue bonds by the Constitution or general law. es ma be issued, when authorized by the board, at any time during the current 22 Not y 35 /~- ~ / 1 fiscal year for the purpose of meeting appropriations made for such fiscal year, in 2 anticipation of the collection of the taxes and revenues of such fiscal year, and within 3 the amount of such appropriations. 4 § 17,03. Vmitations on indebtedness. In the issuance of bonds and notes, the 5 regional government shall be subject to the limitations as to amounts contained in 6 Article VII, Section 10 (a) of the Constitution. ~ § 17.04. Form of bonds and notes. Bonds and notes of the regional g government shall be issued in the manner provided by general law. g § 17.05. Authority for issuance of bonds. The board may issue bonds and 10 notes pursuant to the Public Finance Act (Chapter 5, Title 15.1, Code of Virginia, as 11 amended) or pursuant to the terms of this charter. No bonds or notes of the regional ,12 government shall be issued under this charter until their issuance shall have been ~~ 13 authorized by a majority of the qualified votes of the regional government voting on the 14 question at an election held for the purpose in the manner provided by general law, 15 except as follows: 16 A. The board may authorize the issuance of refunding bonds or notes by an 17 ordinance adopted by the affirmative vote of a majority of all members of the board. 1 g B. The board may authorize the issuance of bonds and other obligations of a 19 type excluded from the computation of indebtedness of cities under Section 10(a) of 20 Article VII of the Constitution by complying with the conditions for exclusion set forth 21 therein. 22 C. The board may authorize the issuance of bonds or notes in any calendar 36 1 year provided that the amount of such bonds or notes together with existing 2 indebtedness of the regional government, as determined in the manner set forth in 3 Section 10(a) of Article VII of the Constitution, shall not exceed ten percent of the 4 assessed valuation of real estate in the regional government subject to taxation, as 5 shown by the last preceding assessment for taxes. Such bonds or notes shall be g authorized by an ordinance adopted by the affirmative vote of two-thirds of all 7 members of the board. g For the purpose of this section, the terms "bonds;' "notes;' "other obligations" 9 and "indebtedness" shall not include contractual obligations of the regional government 10 lease/purchase agreements subject to annual appropriations and revenue bonds 11 payable solely from revenue-producing properties. ~ § 17.06. Payment of bonds and notes. The power and obligations of the 13 re Tonal government to pay any and all bonds and notes issued pursuant to this 9 14 chapter, except revenue bonds made payable solely from revenue-producing 15 properties, shall be unlimited and the board shall levy ad valorem taxes upon all 16 taxable property within the regional government for the payment of such bonds or 17 notes and the interest thereon, without limitations as to rate or amount. The full faith 1 g and credit of the regional government are hereby pledged for the payment of the 1 g principal of and interest on all bonds and notes of the former City of Roanoke and of 20 the former County of Roanoke, and of the regional government hereafter issued 21 pursuant to this chapter, except revenue bonds made payable solely from revenue- ~ producing properties, whether or not such pledge be stated in the bonds or notes or 37 1 in the bond ordinance authorizing their issuance. 2 Chapter 18. 3 Intergovernmental Relationships 4 § 18.01. Towns. Upon and after the effective date of this charter, the Town of 5 g Winton in existence in the County of Roanoke upon the effective date of this charter 7 shall continue to exist and be recognized as a town and shall have and may continue g to exercise as provided by law any and all powers which such town may have had g prior to the effective date of this charter, be they conferred by charter, general law or 1 p any other law. 11 It being the declared purpose of this section that no change in the powers of 12 the Town of Winton shall result from the grant of this charter, except by mutual 3 agreement of the Town of Vnton and Roanoke Metropolitan Government. 14 Chapter 19. 15 Power of Eminent Domain 16 1 ~ § 19.01. Powers. The powers of eminent domain as authorized and limited by 1 g eneral law as to counties and cities and all acts hereafter amendatory thereof and 9 1 g supplemental thereto, mutatis mutandis, are hereby conferred upon the Roanoke 20 Metropolitan Government. 1 ~ 1 g 02, procedure. In any case in which petition for condemnation is filed by 2 or on behalf of the regional government, a true copy of a resolution or ordinance duly 22 23 adopted by the board declaring the necess'~ty for any taking or damaging of any 38 ,~ ,.~. 1 property for the public purposes of the regional government, shall be filed with the 2 petition and shall constitute sufficient evidence of the necessity of the exercise of the 3 powers of eminent domain by the regional government. The regional government may 4 employ the procedures conferred by the foregoing laws, mutatis mutandis. 5 Chapter 20. g Ordinances 7 g §20.01. Ordinances of the regional government Except in dealing with 9 questions of parliamentary procedure, the board shall act only by ordinance or 10 resolution and all ordinances, except ordinances making appropriations or authorizing 11 the contracting of indebtedness or issuance of bonds or other evidence of debt, shall 12 be confined to one subject, which shall be clearly expressed in the title. Ordinances ~ . ~ making appropriations or authorizing the contracting of indebtedness or the issuance 14 of bonds or other obligations and appropriating the money to be raised thereby shat! 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 be confined to those subjects, respectively. The enacting clause of all ordinances passed by the board shall be, "Be it ordained by the board of commissioners of the Roanoke Metropolitan Government." No ordinance, unless it be an emergency measure, shall be passed until it has been read by title at two regular meetings, or the requirement of such reading has been dispensed with by the affirmative vote of eight (8) of the members of the board. Any ordinance introduced and adopted on its first reading at one meeting of the board may be amended and adopted as amended at the next such meeting or subsequent 39 ~%~~ - ~ 1 meeting, provided that the amendment does not materially change the purpose and 2 character of the proposed ordinance. No ordinance or section thereof shall be revised 3 or amended by its title or section number only, but the new ordinance shall contain the 4 entire ordinance, or section or subsection as revised or amended. The ayes and nays 5 shall be taken upon the passage of all ordinances or resolutions and entered upon the 6 journal of the proceedings of the board, and every ordinance or resolution shall 7 require, on final passage, the affirmative vote of a majority of the members. No g member shall be excused from voting except on matters involving the consideration of 9 his own official conduct, or where his financial or personal interests are involved. The 10 effective date of any ordinance passed by the board, except an emergency ordinance, 11 shall be ten (10) days after the second reading. +.~ The board shall act only by ordinance (1) in authorizing the making of any public 13 improvements; (2) in the acquisition of real estate or any interest therein; (3) in 14 authorizing the contracting of indebtedness or the issuance of bonds or other 15 evidences of indebtedness (except temporary loans in anticipation of taxes or revenue 16 or of the sale of bonds lawfully authorized); (4) in authorizing the sale of any property 17 or rights in property of the regional government; or (5) in granting any public utility 18 franchise, privilege, lease or right of any kind to use public property or easement of 19 any description or any renewal, amendment or extension thereof; provided however, 20 that after any such ordinance shall have taken effect, all subsequent proceedings 21 incidental thereto and providing for the carrying out of the purposes of such 22 ordinances may, except as otherwise provided in this charter, be taken by resolution 40 1 of the board. 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 ;, 3 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Chapter 21. M'~scellaneous § 21.01. Court of record. The regional government shall continue to be in and a part of the 23rd Judicial Circuit. The Circuit Court of the City of Roanoke and the Circuit Court of the County of Roanoke shall hereafter be known as the Circuit Court of the Roanoke Metropolitan Government and shall have the same jurisdiction in the Roanoke Metropolitan Government as is conferred by general law upon circuit courts. All actions of every kind, criminal as well as civil, pending in the circuit courts of the City of Roanoke and the County of Roanoke on the effective date of this charter shall automatically be transferred to and shall proceed to final judgment in the Circuit Court of the Roanoke Metropolitan Government. The Circuit Court of the Roanoke Metropolitan Government shall have full authority to issue writs, enforce judgments and decrees, and exercise every manner of judicial function in relation to former actions in the circuit courts of the City of Roanoke and the County of Roanoke as though no change had been made in their status. § 21.02 Notaries. Notaries public for the City of Roanoke and the County of Roanoke shall have full power and authority in the Roanoke Metropolitan Government until their commissions expire. § 21.03. Amendments to charter. This charter may be amended upon approval of any amendments by the Yrginia General Assembly in accordance with the 41 1 Constitution and general laws of the Commonwealth. „ ~ § 21.04. Immunity from gability. The regional government and all its officers, 3 employees, and agents shall retain all immunities from liability available to counties and 4 officers, agents, and employees thereof in the Commonwealth of Virginia. No actions 5 or claims shall be instituted against the regional government unless the claimant shall g have complied with all procedural prerequisites to such actions or claims as are 7 contained in the Constitution and § 8.01-22'L, Code of Virginia, as amended. g § 21,05. Severabil'ity. Should any part of this charter be declared 9 unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such shall have no effect on the 10 constitutionality or validity of any other part of this charter. 11 § 21.06. Assets and liabilities. All assets and liabilities of the City of Roanoke and the County of Roanoke existing as of the effective date of this charter shall 13 continue to be assets and liabil'rries of the Roanoke Metropolitan Government from and 14 after the effective date of this charter, except as provided expressly herein. 15 § 21.07. Incorporation of new cities or towns- annexation immuniity. Upon the 16 effective date of this charter no unincorporated area within the limits of the regional 17 government shall be incorporated as a separate town or city within the limits of the 18 regional government whether by judicial proceedings or otherwise. The regional 19 government shall enjoy total immunity from city-initiated annexation and city 20 incorporation. 42 ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER~z~/ ~ ~- - 5 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: December 19, 1989 AGENDA ITEM: Public Hearings 1289-2, 1289-3, 1289-4, 1289-5 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The above listed public hearings were advertised to be heard this evening but WILL NOT BE HEARD for the following reasons: 1289-2 An ordinance to change the zoning classification of approximately 35 acres of real estate generally located south of I-81 and west of Plantation Road in the Hollins Magisterial District from R-1 to M- 1 for mixed-use development with conditions upon the application of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. WITHDRAWN BY THE PETITIONER 1289-3 An ordinance to amend the Future Land Use Map designation of a 24.09 acre tract generally located south of Buck Mountain Road and east of the Blue Ridge Parkway, in the Cave Spring Magisterial District, from Rural Village to Principal Industrial, and to rezone said property from M-2 to M-3, with conditions upon the request of the Virginia Asphalt Paving Company THIS ITEM WAS DEFERRED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION ON DECEMBER 5, 1989 1289-4 An ordinance to rezone approximately 4.47 acres from R-3 to B-1 to construct an office park, located at the southwest corner of Cresthill Drive and Garst Mill Road, in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District, upon the request of Nolan Jackson. THIS ITEM WAS DEFERRED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION ON DECEMBER 5, 1989 1289-5 An ordinance to amend the Future Land Use Plan map designation of approximately 54 acres located west DEG - 1 3- B 9 W E D 1 6 3 7 F M I N C A D M I N .~ P U R C H A S E P 0 2 Vs~ rr ~,~._~.: 2151(cr~l~hcr~sr lead. N.W. ' ROan«lu~,yrl;irrlt~ 1-1f)12 7U~ 2fi,~-210f3 ~ " • December 13, 1989 Mr. Tx.m Gubdla ~' Director of Economic Deve~.opment Roanoke Gaunty 373$ Brambleton Avenue, S. W. Roanoke, VA. 24018 Dear Tim: We hereby request that you continue the matter of rezoning 54 acres on Old Hollins Road for sixty (SO) days to facili- tate further p~.anning efforts necessary to securing a vfa~ • ble contract on the property. Thank you. Sincerely, VALLEY MANAGEMENT, ING. ~~ I`~-F. '~ Step en Rice '- ExecutivE Vice President sR/gf f / AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, DECEMBER 19, 1989 ORDINANCE 121989-18 TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A 3.13 ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED AT 6044 COVE ROAD IN THE CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF R1 TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF RE WITH CONDITIONS UPON THE APPLICATION OF JAMES AND CHARLOTTE MOORS WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on November 28, 1989, and the second reading and public hearing was held on December 19, 1989; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on December 5, 1989; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing 3.13 acres, as described herein, and located at 6044 Cove Road, Roanoke County, Virginia, (Tax Map Number 36.11- 2-35) in the Catawba Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of R1, Single Family Residential District, to the zoning classification of RE, Residential Estate District. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of James and Charlotte Moore. 3. That the applicant has voluntarily proffered in writing the following condition which the Board of Supervisors hereby accepts: (1) The property is being rezoned to allow a maximum of two horses to be kept for personal use; this being the only use permitted in the request for rezoning of the property, restricting all other uses permitted under RE, Residential Estate District. 4. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: BEGINNING at a point on Cove Road, corner to the property of Elmer and Anna Boone Divers, as shown in Deed Book 341, at page 363, in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia; thence, with Cove Road S. 34° 30' 00" E. 165.11 feet to a found iron, corner to the property of Jack G. Garst, as shown in Deed Book 948, at page 235 in the aforesaid Clerk's Office; thence S. 55° 29' 15" W. 807.12 feet to a found iron, said point being the southwest corner of the property herein conveyed; thence N. 04° 24' 10" W. 224.36 feet to a found iron, said point being the northwesterly corner of the property herein conveyed; thence proceeding N. 57° 52' 35" E. 695.21 feet to the point of BEGINNING, containing 3.115 acres, more or less, as shown by survey made for James Alan Moore and Charlotte Scott Moore by Kenneth E. Carlton, C.L.S., dated June 4, 1986. 5. That the effective date of this ordinance shall be December 19, 1989. On motion of Supervisor McGraw, seconded by Supervisor Robers, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisor Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Brenda J. Ho ton, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Development & Inspections Terry Harrington, Director, Planning John Willey, Director, Real Estate Assessment Paul Mahoney, County Attorney .~ PETITIONER: JAMES & CHARTATTE MOORE CASE N[JMBER: 44-12/89 Planning Coymission Hearing Date: December 5, 1989 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: December 19, 1989 !~ ~q'_ ~ A. REQUEST Petition of James & Charlotte Moore to conditionally rezone 3.13 acres fr~n R-1 to R-E to allow two horses, located at 6044 Cove Road, Catawba Magisterial District. B. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION There was no opposition to the request. C. SIGNIFICANT IMPACT FACTORS 1. None. D. PROFFERED CONDITIONS 1. A maximum of_ two horses will be kept on the property. E. CODMQISSIONER' S MOTION, WTE AND REASON Mr. Massey moved to approve the petition with proffered condition. The motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Massey, Gordon, Robinson, Witt NAYS: None ABSENT: Winstead F. DISSENTING PERSPEC'T'IVE None. G. AT'PACHMENTS Concept Plan (8~" x 11") Vicinity Map (8~" x 11") Staff Report Other Terrance Harrington, cretary Roanoke County Planning Commission / 2 S~,_~, CASE NUMBERS 44-12/89 REVIEWED BY: Janet Scheid STAFF REPORT PETITIONER: James & Charlotte Moore DATES November 28, 1989 Petition of James and Charlotte Moore to conditionally rezone 3.13 acres from R-1 to R-E to allow two horses, located at 6044 Cove Road, Catawba Magisterial District. 1. NATURE OF REQUEST a. Conditional request to rezone a 3.13 acre parcel of land from R-1 Residential to R-E Residential Estates. b. This request is solely for the purpose of allowing the landowners to keep a maximum of 2 horses on the property. 2. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS a. The R-E Residential Estate District allows a wide variety of uses. The primary permitted use is single-family detached dwellings. Also permitted are agricultural uses including the keeping of horses. 3. SITE CHARACTERISTICS a. Topography: Site is relatively flat. The rear of the property slopes slightly to the southwest. b. Ground Cover: Grass with scattered mature hardwoods. c. Improvements: Residence and a two-stall barn. 4. AREA CHARACTERISTICS a. Future Growth Priority: Situated within the Peters Creek Community Planning Area. The growth initiative for this area is to stimulate growth. b. General Area: The area surrounding the site is entirely residential. 5. LAND USE IMPACT ASSESSMENT Rating: Rate each factor according to the impact of the proposed action. Use a scale of 1 through 5. 1 = positive impact, 2 = negligible impact, 3 = manageable impact, 4 = disruptive impact, 5 = severe impact, and N/A = not applicable. RATING FACTOR COMMENTS 3 a. Comprehensive Plan: The 1985 Comprehensive Development Plan has placed this area within the Development designation. Agricultural uses are discouraged in this area and identified as being of "low compatibility". Conventional residential development is desirable within Development areas. e~~.~~ 2 b. Surrounding Lands All residential with a significant number being large lot (one acre and greater). 2 c. Neighboring Area: Predominately residential. 2 d. Site Layout: A concept plan has been submitted showing three separate, fenced pastures and a two stall barn behind the residence. N/A e. Architectures Not applicable. N/A f. Screening and Landscape: Not applicable. N/A g. Amenities: Not applicable. 2 h. Natural Features: Pasture land and scattered mature hardwoods. N/A i. Traffic: Not applicable - no change in use. N/A .i. Utilities: Not applicable - no change in use. N/A k. Drainage: Not applicable - no change in use. N/A 1. Public Services: Not applicable - no change in use. N/A m. Tax Base: Not applicable - no change in use. N/A n. Environment: Not applicable - no change in use. b. PLAN CONSISTENCY This area is currently designated as Development. This designation is consistent with both the current R-1 zoning and the large-lot .residential aspects of the requested R-E zoning change. The Land Use Plan Designation "Development" indicates "high compatibility" with low density residential development less than one unit per acre but indicates "low compatibility" with agricultural uses. 7. STAFF EVALUATION The petition before you is to change the zoning on this specific site from R-1 residential to R-E residential solely for the purpose of allowing the landowners to keep a maximum of two horses, for their personal use, on their 3.13 acre site. The Land Use Map designates this site as Development. While horses are allowed on property zoned R-E the Development land use plan designation discourages agricultural uses. The Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance defines agriculture as "the tilling of soil, the raising of crops, horticulture, forestry, gardening, the keeping of animals and fowl, and any agricultural industry or business such as fruit packing plants, dairies or similar uses". Based on this definition, the keeping of 1 or 2 horses (or for that matter dogs, cats or llamas) would be considered an agricultural use and would be discouraged at this site. In reality, horses at this site will have little to no impact on the neighboring landowners and is in keeping with the nature of the surrounding community. Petitioner has proffered to limit the number of horses kept at this site to a maximum of 2 horses. No additional proffers are suggested. ~-~- ~~ - ~ ROANOKE COUNTY REZONING APPLICATION Date Rec.: Received By: Case No.: Ord. No.. 1, owner's Name : ~~}.y~Es ,1,1 ~ ~' r~ ~e /YIo~.~ C. Phone : 5 ~ a ~S/a ~/ Address: ~/~C,l, ~uUC cI~-c~ /j/ /~k~ ~/~- 2. Applicant's Name: Address: Phone: 3. Location of Property;_ ~~y~CpliC ~~ ~~rf Tax Map Number (s) : 3 ~ ~/ _ ~ _ 35'" 4. Magisterial District:_ ~,¢r-,~~,~~ 5. Size of Property: ~~,f 3 6. Existing Zoning:~,~;~ ~./o_, ~` / _ ~ Existing Land Use: /P / 7. Proposed Zoning:_ ~ E Proposed Land Use: ~E 8. Comprehensive Plan Designation:~~~1w_._,.~- 9. Are Conditions Proffered With This Request? Yes No (If you are voluntarily offering proffers as a part of your applica- tion, these proffers must be in writing. A member of the Planning Staff can assist you in the preparation of these proffers.) 10. Value of Land and (Proposed) Buildings: il. The Following Items Must Be Submitted With This Application. Please Check If Enclosed. Application Will Not Be Accepted If Any Of These Items Are Missing Or Incomplete: Letter of Application 'X Concept Plan Metes and Bounds Description ~- List of Adjacent Owners of Property (Attach Exhibit A) ~_ Vicinity Map Applicd~:iot~ r'ee ~_ Written Proffers ~~ Water and Sewer Application (If Applicable) 12. Signature Of Property Owner, Contract Purchaser, Or Owner's Agent: Signature Date / 2-8~/- ~p ~ `I ~1 ~,~ ~`~ ~ ~~'~ October 11 , 1989 .~ ~g ~'~, w ~jJ4.' ~~~C1~ h~ •' "> > ` F ti Roanoke County Planning and Zoning ~'~ E~~~;.S~~~L~ ~w Roanoke County Administration Center ~ ~~~'~ ~4- 3738 Brambleton Ave. `pt95-~~2~ Roanoke, VA 24018 Dear Sirs: We would like to request that our property at 6044 Cove Road be rezoned to R-E Residential Estate District in order to allow a maximum of two horses for personal use. I would like to proffer that this be the only use permitted in the request for rezoning of the property, restricting all other uses permitted under R-E Residential Estate District. We currently have a two stall horse barn on our three acres of land, however since there has not been horses on the property for two years we are not allowed to have them at the present time. All of our land is located at the rear of the house and has three separate fenced pastures. These horses would not be located near any immediate neighbors. At this time there are horses housed at other locations in our immediate neighborhood. Thank you for your time and consideration in this matter. Please advise should you need any further information. Sincerely, . G ~ ~~~~ J . Ala Moore 6044 Cove Road Roanoke, VA 24019 562-2424 home 561-8099 work ::~s ~: . ~^C - • . ' ~"• N py 2y~ip, W ~~g's~s ~„Q^zsr ,r • ~~ • 224. 36. ., ~~^•• D .7~~ 8. ~t ` ` `` 0j A6• s9 j a NOTES 1. LEGAL RFEREENCEt DEED BOOK 1207 PC.59S 2. TA7I NO.t 36.11-2-35 3. PROPERTY NOT IN HUD FLOOD HAZARD ZOlIE• • LEGEND SURVBYED PROPERTY LINE ~' ' • ~-SURVEYED TIS LIMB 3.115 ACRES "-""DEED LINE ^•••~ •••.~BRANCH . • ' Z '--~ --OVERHEAD ELECTRIC ' ~ O FOUND IRON ' 1 t ~1 i ~+ .SHADING DENOTES CONCRETE U' ' ~ ~ N' :: N~ ~, ~'+ . ~ ~ t^ ': a JACi( G. GARST its O.g. 94! TG.235 I ELMEA 1. D\VERS ~' . - O.t1.3Y1 %.343 ~~ ~ ' ~ _ , ~, ~ O ~~ ' ;:'1 .1 ~~ ~~ f',`,! I SURVEY FOR: JAMES ALRN MOORS CHARLOTTE NSCOTT MOORS fMME 6~wM 3.11 ACRE TRACT AT 6044 COVE ROAD CATANBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA SURVEYED JUNE 4, 1986 JOB NUMBER 60423 ~ .' ~LTH p~,, Yl~ ' H :TH E. CARLTON> C ' ~ , 001524 t r.rwa SCALE 1~-50• e is so' wo' ~~ ' LMCE 1 ? 1 O \~~ j 1 r 1 ~ ` ~ M ~ u- X ~ .11epp Ot 1 ~, i. t, pf1 ti µpM ~ ~ ~ L P ~ r. ~t'~ \Z~~~ ti •~• R AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 16 S. COLLEGE AVE. ~/ O `~ '~~ ~epl Sd6E 47 153 C QV -~ ----i -_ _- -- ---, - ~ 138 KV `A.P.CO. t 1 • I µ ' / ~`. ~..~^ 1 ,'" ~~e.~ OU.tO ``,\~ ` INN ~\ ~ ; ~' VICINlT1' MAP • ~ ~ fo `~ , 'D~ r '. 16 7 ` ~- • 1.34 Ac \ ~+ ~` ~i 3f \ do ~+ ,r ~ 32 ao _ ~ i ~ 5 120At a 6 2.00 Ac -. ~. ''• ', ~ 24~ • ,~~ 23 • ~' r ~c ' ,P Q ~ 21 ' ~ ' • ~ ~ . ~ \ ~ ~\ . ~ ~ ., 19 ' ' e N~ -_____ AlL PARCELS C N THIS ~1AP ARE Z~NEp R1 _, iJ~~ESS OTHERWISE !~~®~~ATED. ~~ -1 JAMES ~ L's14Rt orrE/~eo,¢~ COMMUNITY SBRVICBS AND DBVBLOPMBNT ~ / re R E' 3 ~. i/- oz -35 2B ,~ ~ r' `P 3a 'a lee A< ' 34 \ 1.4! ~2 8~_~ ,~4~1'TH ~..~ ~: ~~ „ , ~ ~ _. 1; t_. _~, AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, DECEMBER 19, 1989 ORDINANCE TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A 3.13 ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED AT 6044 COVE ROAD IN THE CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF R1 TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF RE WITH CONDITIONS UPON THE APPLICATION OF JAMES AND CHARLOTTE MOORE WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on November 28, 1989, and the second reading and public hearing was held on December 19, 1989; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on December 5, 1989; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing 3.13 acres, as described herein, and located at 6044 Cove Road, Roanoke County, Virginia, (Tax Map Number 36.11- 2-35) in the Catawba Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of R1, Single Family Residential District, to the zoning classification of RE, Residential Estate District. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of James and Charlotte Moore. 3. That the applicant has voluntarily proffered in writing the following condition which the Board of Supervisors hereby accepts: (1) The property is being rezoned to allow a maximum of i.~- two horses to be kept for personal use; this being the only use permitted in the request for rezoning of the property, restricting all other uses permitted under RE, Residential Estate District. 4. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: BEGINNING at a point on Cove Road, corner to the property of Elmer and Anna Boone Divers, as shown in Deed Book 341, at page 363, in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia; thence, with Cove Road S. 34° 30' 00" E. 165.11 feet to a found iron, corner to the property of Jack G. Garst, as shown in Deed Book 948, at page 235 in the aforesaid Clerk's Office; thence S. 55° 29' 15" W. 807.12 feet to a found iron, said point being the southwest corner of the property herein conveyed; thence N. 04° 24' 10" W. 224.36 feet to a found iron, said point being the northwesterly corner of the property herein conveyed; thence proceeding N. 57° 52' 35" E. 695.21 feet to the point of BEGINNING, containing 3.115 acres, more or less, as shown by survey made for James Alan Moore and Charlotte Scott Moore by Kenneth E. Carlton, C.L.S., dated June 4, 1986. 5. That the effective date of this ordinance shall be December 19, 1989. ACTION # ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: December 19, 1989 AGENDA ITEM: Ordinance amending Chapter 8, "Erosion and Sediment Control" of the Roanoke County Code by amending Section 8-11 (a), "Control Measures Generally", to provide for the adoption of Stormwater Management Criteria, and a Resolution adopting a new section of the Design and Construction Standards Manual entitled "Stormwater Management Criteria". COUNTY 'ADM'INISTRATOR' S COMMENTS: ~,c,~-r,~c,•r-n,~..r..~.~ ~~ yn .n,cJLw'Gut.~...~ a~~~ BACKGROUND 1 At the October 24, 1989 Board of Supervisors meeting, the County Staff outlined the provisions of the proposed amendments to the Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinance; Addressed: 1. On-site detention/retention of 10 and 50 year storms. 2. On-site grading to manage surface run-off to appropriate and adequate drainage facilities. 3. Require maintenance of detention facilities by Ordinance. 4. To insure new developments do not create new problems and aggravate old problems. Not Addressed: 1. Does not correct existing downstream flooding. 2. Does not address flooding conditions greater than a 50 year storm. On November 13, 1989, the Roanoke County Staff met with members of the Roanoke Valley Homebuilders Association to discuss five items of interest that affected both groups. Of the five items discussed, two were resolved and the three items listed below remain outstanding, those sections are attached, in their entirety, for your information. 1. Section 502.00 (b) - this requires detention basins in drainage areas equal to, or greater than a 100 acres, to be designed to meet the 10 and 50 year frequency storms. Homebuilders response: They feel that this item should be eliminated in the present draft because this was addressing a regional problem which is presently being prepared by the Fifth District Planning Commission. The County Staff has established the 50 year storm event to be the cutoff between stormwater management and flood control. The 50 year storm design provides maximum benefit at a reasonable additional cost over the 10 year event. 2. Section 502.03.1 - Waivers - Roanoke Valley Homebuilders have requested that the person in charge of waivers be John R. Hubbard. The County Staff recommends that since this is an Amendment to the Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinance, the titles and procedures remain consistent with the present Ordinance. 3. Section 506.01 - Maintenance of stormwater Management Facilities_in Single Family, Townhouse and Condominium Developments - The Roanoke Valley Homebuilders recommend that maintenance of detention/retention facilities in residential developments be maintained by Roanoke County and that a line item be placed in the 1991 budget. The County Staff is presently requiring a Homeowners Association, or Property Manager, to have this responsibility. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION Two separate actions by the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will be required: 1. Adoption of Ordinance amending the Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinance. ~.z 2. Adoption of a Resolution adding a new section to the Design and Construction Standards Manual. The First Reading was held on October 10, 1989; the Public Hearing and Second Reading is scheduled for December 19, 1989. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the proposed amendments to the Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinance and Resolution incorporating the "Stormwater Management Criteria" in the Design and Construction Standards Manual, be adopted. The Amendments, Additions and Reenactments shall be in full force and effect, from and after October 25, 1989, and effective date of this Ordinance and Stormwater Management Criteria for the Design and Construction Standards Manual shall apply to plans which have not been accepted for review by the Department of Development and Inspections prior to October 25, 1989; provided said plans in the review process receive final approval by the County within 60 days of October 25, 1989. ~I~MITTED BY: APPROVED BY: 1I 1 Arnold Coffey Elmer C. Hodge Development and I spections County Administrator & Inspections --------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: __ No Yes Abs Denied ( ) __ _ Garrett Received ( ) __ __ ____ _ Johnson Referred _ McGraw To ---- -- --- -- Nickens - -- -- R o be r s 502.00 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REQUIREMENT All subdivisions and developments requiring a site development plan occurring within the County shall, as a minimum, either have on-site or provide off-site stormwater management facilities, adequate to meet the following conditions: a. reduce runoff rate generated by postdevelopment 10-year frequency storms to the runoff rate generated by a predeveloped 2-year frequency storm conditions when the development point of discharge is to a receiving natural watercourse with a drainage area of less than 100 acres. b. reduce runoff rate generated by postdevelopment 50-year frequency storms to the runoff rate generated by a predeveloped 10-year frequency storm conditions and reduce runoff rate generated by postdevelopment 10-year frequency storms to the runoff rate generated by a predeveloped 2-year frequency storm conditions when the development point of discharge is to a receiving natural watercourse with a drainage area equal to, or greater, than 100 acres. No application for a preliminary or final plan of subdivision nor shall any site development plan be approved unless it includes an acceptable plan describing the manner in which erosion, sediment, and stormwater resulting from the development will be controlled or managed. This plan shall indicate whether stormwater will be managed on-site or off-site, 11 /.2 ~~- '~ For purposes of clarity and administrative efficiency, the following conditions shall apply to these guidelines and the resultant plans developed under them: 1. Building on or resurfacing an existing impervious area shall not require stormwater management nor shall it be included as an additional impervious area. 2. Impervious area calculations for buildings shall include all overhanging projections such as eaves, canopies and porticoes. 502.03.1 WAIVER CRITERIA: The Director shall evaluate all requests for waivers against the following criteria. No waiver shall be granted unless the Director certifies in writing that the proposed development meets at least one of the following criteria. Prior to making any such determination, the Director may require that the landowner/developer's Engineer provide any information necessary to making such a determination. A waiver request of stormwater management will be evaluated based on the following conditions: 1. The hydraulic characteristics of the receiving stream or the environmental characteristics of the stream or the site are such that on-site management or detention of flows are contrary to sound engineering practices or detrimental to the environment; 15 ~~ ~~ 2. The increased amount of quantity or velocity of stormwater generated by the development will have a minor effect on the receiving stream; 502.03.2 WAIVER REQUESTS: Each request for waiver will be considered individually by the Director. .All applications for a waiver will receive a written response outlining the reasons for approval, or denial, of the application within 30 days of receipt of all information requested by the Director. In reviewing the waiver application, all storm drainage outfalls, receiving channels and channel capacities, velocities and other related storm drainage discharge considerations the Director shall closely examine to determine the need for additional outfall treatment and/or channel protection needs. Further, the developer's professional engineer shall furnish the Director a "Declaration of Adequacy" prior to granting a stormwater management waiver when adequacy of the receiving channel is in question. 502.04 REQUIREMENT FOR PRO RATA SHARE CONTRIBUTION: - reserved 502.05 PRO RATA SHARE VALUES - reserved 502.05.1 Reserved 502.05.2 Reserved 502.05.3 Reserved 502.06 RIGHT-OF-WAY stormwater management systems for certain types of development designed in or adjacent to the road right-of-way will 16 /2897 506.00 MAINTENANCE OF STORM DRAINAGE AND STORMWATER MANAGEMENT STEMS Easements shall be dedicated to public use during the land development process when the topography and the natural drainageways are altered. Drainage easements are required for the maintenance of storm sewer systems, open channels as defined by the Virginia Erosion and Sediment Control Handbook, improved drainageways of increased concentrated runoff and for stormwater management facilities. Access easements are necessary for emergency public access to maintain a drainageway or storm sewer system located on private property. Furthermore, drainage easements are intended to restrict private property owners from disturbing land contained in the easement in such a manner as to alter the drainageway to the detriment of neighbors upstream or downstream. Similarly, easements for underground pipes assure that no other permanent structures will be allowed therein. The purpose of this section is to define the responsibility for the maintenance of storm drainage and stormwater management facilities located in the easements dedicated to public use. Public maintenance responsibility will not be accepted for retention facilities with a permanent pool, or underground storage tanks. 5 0 6 0 01_ S INGLE . FA~II~,Y ~ . TO`i1NF3O' d t ,'.9 , ~P+I_ri ^~~ .~;~ °~;r ?yi S3M !?E°~E~OPMENTS .` The maintenance of stormwater management facilities located in a properly dedicated public easement will be the responsibility of the Homeowners' Association or property manager. 29 /.,.~~ ,~ The storm drainage system, also located in a properly dedicated public easement, shall be maintained by the Homeowners' Association, or property manager. Roanoke County's Department of Development and Inspections may accept maintenance responsibility for stormwater management or storm drainage facilities which are in open common areas with adequate access capabilities and are not located in or under paved areas. Situations such as these will be considered on an individual basis. The following note shall be added to the easement Plat: "The Homeowners' Association or property manager of this development shall assume the maintenance responsibility of the storm drainage system and of the stormwater management facility located therein, and contained within an easement properly dedicated to public use." The note may be modified where maintenance of the storm sewer system is accepted by the County. 506.02 OFFICES, SHOPPING CENTERS, RENTAL MULTIFAMILY DWELLINGS, MOBILE HOME PARKS, COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL DEVELOPMENT: For. maintenance of storm drainage systems and stormwater management facilities located in commercial, office, industrial, rental multifamily dwellings, mobile home parks or similar uses, the following note should be added to the Plat: "The owner of fee title to the property on which an easement is shown is responsible for maintenance of .the storm drainage or stormwater management facilities located therein." 30 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, DECEMBER 19, 1989 RESOLUTION ADOPTING A NEW SECTION OF THE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS MANUAL ENTITLED "STORMWATER MANAGEMENT CRITERIA" WHEREAS, the Department of Development is in the process of preparing a manual to assist the public, and especially the development community, for clarification of rules, regulations, and policies applicable to land development in Roanoke County; and WHEREAS, a Design and Construction Standards Committee composed of area engineers, surveyors, members of the Roanoke Valley Homebuilders Association, and County staff was assembled to develop the content of the manual and the design standards; and WHEREAS, it was the consensus of the committee to address the areas of water, sewer, street and parking, and stormwater management in the manual; and WHEREAS, at its meeting on February 14, 1989, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, by resolution, adopted a manual of regulations and policies entitled "Design and Construction Standards Manual" to assist the public in the clarification and interpretation of rules, regulations, and policies applicable to land development in Roanoke County, and in particular, the areas of water, sewer, street and parking; and WHEREAS, the water design standards, street and parking design standards and specifications, and subdivision approval for on-site sewage disposal and well systems standards chapters of the manual have been previously completed and adopted. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, does hereby adopt the fourth component of the Design and Construction Standards Manual entitled "Stormwater Management Criteria" which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Further, this section of the manual shall be in full force and effect from and after December 19, 1989, and the stormwater management criteria shall apply to plans which have not been accepted for review by the Department of Development and Inspection prior to December 19, 1989, provided said plans in the review process receive final approval by the County within sixty (60) days of December 19, 1989. .. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, DECEMBER 19, 1989 ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 8, "EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL" OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE BY AMENDING SECTION 8-11(a), "CONTROL MEASURES GENERALLY" TO PROVIDE FOR THE ADOPTION OF STORMWATER MANAGEMENT CRITERIA WHEREAS, the adoption of more stringent criteria to regulate stormwater management is authorized by Section 10.1-562 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended; and WHEREAS, notice of the County's intention to adopt an amendment to its erosion and sediment control ordinance was duly advertised in the Roanoke Times and World News on October 10, 1989, October 17, 1989, December 5, 1989, and Decmeber 12, 1989; and WHEREAS, the first reading on this ordinance was held on October 10, 1989; the second reading and public hearing were held on December 19, 1989. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That Chapter 8, "Erosion and Sediment Control" of the Roanoke County Code be, and hereby is, amended and reenacted by amending Section 8-11(a) to read and provide as follows: Sec. 8-11. Control measures generally. (a) Practices for erosion and sediment control in the county shall meet or exceed the standards and specifications contained in the Virginia Erosion and Sediment Control Handbook, Part III, a published and amended through March 8, 1983, in haec verba and the Code of Virginia, as amended, through such date, except for those more strinaent local stormwater management criteria which the Board /~ .. of Subervisors of Roanoke County Virginia may adopt by resolution and incort~orate into the manual of regulations and policies entitled " Desian and Construction Standards Manual " 2. That these amendments, additions, and reenactments shall be in full force and effect from and after December 19, 1989, and that the effective date for this ordinance and the stormwater management criteria for the Design and Construction Standards Manual shall apply to plans which have not been accepted for review by the Department of Development and Inspections prior to December 19, 1989; provided said plans in the review process receive final approval by the County within sixty (60) days of December 19, 1989. 1111111111111111 ~111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 APPEARANCE RE QUEST = AGENDA ITEM NO. ~ ~' -- ~' ' SUBJECT ~~ ,~ .= __ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supex~isors to recognize me during the public hearin on the above m atter - so that I may comment.WHEN CALLS TO THE PODIUM, = I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE _ RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES - LISTED BELOW. =_ • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will = decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the malonty of the Board to .= do otherwise. _ ,;_ • Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Ques- Lions of clarification may be entertained by the Chauman. c • All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized _ speaker and audience members is not allowed. - _ - Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. _ • Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. _ • INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED -' GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION c FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT c - THEM. - - _ c ,. - PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO DEPUTY CLERK __ . NAME - - ,~ - _ - ADDRESS t = - ~ ,1~ - - - - - - - - - PHONE .- ,~'~ 3-~ - - - _ _ _ Iillllllllllllllillllilllllllilllllllllllllll IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIilllllllillllllililllllllllllllllllllilllllllllllllllllllllllllllll'i't t~iiiiiiiiiiiiitiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiu _ . _ . _ ~a - ~q ~ APPEARANCE RE UEST _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ AGENDA ITEM NO. 1 z.g~! --- 7 SUBJECT ~o~~o•v ~ S~~Irn~v i L°D~ I QoL I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supex~tisors to recognize me during the public hearin on the above matter = so that I ma comment.WHEN CALLS TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GI E MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES - = c LISTED BELOW. • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will -_ c decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. • Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Ques- _= bons of cl ' 'cation may be entertained by the Chauman. _ • All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. _ • Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. • INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED = GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. c PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO DEPUTY CLERK _ __ NAME ALF2~-~ Po~~~..~ c __ ADDRESS 3 `~~o Fib ~~ ll ~~ v 5 i _ __ PHONE 3 8 7,~~ D~ ~ c _ it~iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii~iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii~iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiill'I'I ~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, DECEMBER 19, 1989 ORDINANCE 121989-19 TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF 11.848 ACRES OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED AT THE END OF BENOIS ROAD IN THE CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF R1 TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF M1 FOR INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT WITH CONDITIONS UPON THE APPLICATION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA WHEREAS, by Resolution 91289-4 the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, initiated amendments to the Comprehensive Plan and to the classifications of certain real estate located in Roanoke County to serve the public purposes of the County as required by public necessity, convenience, general welfare, and good zoning practice in order to implement the recommendations of the Economic Development Action Plan for FY 1989-90; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on October 24, 1989, and the second reading and public hearing was held on December 19, 1989; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on November 9, 1989; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing 11.848 acres, as described herein, owned by Atlantic Concrete and located at the end of Benois Road in the Cave Spring Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of R-l, Single-family Residential District, to the zoning classification of M1, Light Industrial District. 2. That the Board initiated the application to change the zoning classification of this real estate located in Roanoke County to serve the public purposes of the County as required by public necessity, convenience, general welfare, and good zoning practice to implement the recommendations of the Economic Development Action Plan for FY 1989-90. 3. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: Beginning at a point designated No. 1, being the north- westerly corner of an 11.848-acre tract herein-described, said point being corner to the property of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, and on the line of Lot 6, Block G, Section 3, Penn Forest; thence leaving said Point of Beginning and following a line between Section 3, Penn Forest, and the property herein-des- cribed, N. 36° 51' E. 1326.2 feet to Point No. 2; thence continuing with Penn Forest, Section 5, and the property herein-described, N. 34° 00' E. 195.00 feet to Point No. 3; thence continuing with Section 5, Penn Forest, N. 38° 25' E. 467.1 feet to Point No. 4, corner to the property of Harold E. Rose, et al.; thence with the Rose property and the property herein-described, S. 67° 11' E. 110 feet to Point No. 5; thence following the zoning line between R-1 and M-2, property of Atlantic Concrete, S. 19° 44' 07" W. 367.26 feet to Point No. 6; thence continuing with said zoning line, S. 21° 17' W. 135.00 feet to Point No. 7; thence S. 35° 11' 04" W. 1554.74 feet to Point No. 8 on the line of the property of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia; thence with the Board of Supervisors property and the property herein-described, N. 49° 13' W. 300 feet to the Point of Beginning and being a parcel of land containing 11.848 acres, being zoned R-1 and being as shown on zoning plat for A. V. Criss Sr. Trust by T. P. Parker & Son, Engineers and Surveyors dated October 25, 1989. 4. That Atlantic Concrete, as owner of this real estate, has voluntarily proffered in writing the following conditions which the Board of Supervisors hereby accepts: (1) The property will not include permitted uses for: (a) Automobile painting, upholstering, repairing, rebuilding, reconditioning, body and fender work, truck repairing or overhauling; (b) Manufacturing of pottery and figurines or other similar ceramic products; (c) Veterinary hospital and commercial kennels with exterior runs and yards; (d) Flea Markets, unless a special exception has been granted by the Board of Supervisors; and (e) Seed and feed stores. (2) A minimum 100 foot buffer yard along the western property boundaries to be otherwise administered in conformance with Section 21-92 of the Zoning Ordinance; that existing vegeta- tion be retained within the 100 foot buffer yard, and supplemented where necessary in order to maintain the existing screening of this site from adjoining residences. (3) Sound levels shall not exceed 60 dba when measured at adjoining residences. (4) Hours of operation shall be limited from 6:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m. on this property. 5. That the effective date of this ordinance shall be December 19, 1989. On motion of Supervisor Robers, seconded by Supervisor McGraw, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisor Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Brenda J. Ho on, Deputy, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Development & Inspections Terry Harrington, Director, Planning John Willey, Director, Real Estate Assessment Paul Mahoney, County Attorney ~ , CASE INQ9BER: 3~g ~~gg ~O OF SUPERVISORS/ATLANTIC OONQ2ETE ~ Planning Commission Hearing Date: November 9, 1989 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: November 28, 1989 A. RDQ(JEST Petition of Roanoke County Board of Supervisors to rezone approximately 15 acres from R-1 to M-1 for industrial developc~ent, located at the end of Benois Road, Cave Spring Magisterial District. B. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION There was no opposition to the request. C. SI(~1IFICANT IMPACT FACTORS 1. Surrounding Land: Immediately adjoining this site to the north and south are light industrial uses, including the Southwest Industrial Park. To the east is the N&W Railroad, open space, and single family residences. The entire western border adjoins scxne 20 single-family residences. 2. Screening and Landscaping: The area proposed for rezoning was retained in the R-1 zoning district to serve as a buffer for adjoining vacant property that has since been developed with single-family residences. As previously discussed, Policy I-9 suggests that exceptional design measures are necessary to mitigate land use impacts when residential and industrial uses are located adjacent to each other. One aspect of exceptional design is sufficient screening and buffering. Adequate screening and buffering can minimize impacts associated with noise and visibility resulting fran industrial land uses. Specifically, staff is recommending the property owner proffer as a minimum 100 foot buffer yard along the western property boundaries. In addition, the existing vegetation should be retained, and supplemented where necessary, in order to maintain the existing screening of this site fran adjoining residences. D. PRUFFER® CONDITIONS No proffered conditions had been offered at the time of the Commission public hearing. Mr. Gubala presented to, and discussed with, the Planning Commission potential proffers and indicated a willingness to approach the property owner to request the proffers suggested by the Planning Commission. The following are proffers suggested by the Planning Commission: 1. The following uses shall be prohibited fran this site: automobile painting, upholstering, repairing, rebuilding, reconditioning, body and fender work, truck repairing or overhauling; manufacture of pottery and figurines or other similar ceramic products; veterinary hospital and commercial kennels with exterior runs and yards; flea markets unless a special exception has been granted by the Board of Supervisors; seed and feed stores. 2. A minimum 100 foot buffer yard along the western property boundaries to be administered in conformance with § 21-92 of the zoning ordinance. 3. Existing vegetation shall be retained within the 100 foot buffer yard and supplemented where necessary in order to maintain the existing screening of this site frccn adjoining residences. 4. Sound levels not to exceed 60 dbA when measured at the adjoining residences. ~. i~.8~'-~ E. OtxT~tISSIONER' S NYJTION, VOTE AND REASON Mr. Witt moved to approve the petition contingent upon the formal receipt of the above proffers. The motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYffi: Massey, Gordon, Robinson, Witt NAYS: None ABSEN'P: Winstead F. DISSE1~TrING PERSPECTIVE None. G. ATTAC:f~ENrS Concept Plan (8+~" x 11") Vicinity Map (8+~" x 11") Staf f Report Other - Terrance rri gton Secretary Roanoke unty P1 ing Camlission STAFF REPORT -~ ~, i2 ~~ lSE NUMBEF;: 38-11/89 PETITIONER: Roanoke Co. Board of Supervisors ,.r_VIEWED BY: Jon Hartley DATE: November 1, 1989 Petition of foanok.e.County Board of Supervisors to unconditionally rezone appro:<imately 15 acres from R-1, Residential to M-i. Light Industrial, for industrial development, located at the end of Benois F;oad (Route 633), in the Cave Spring Magisterial District. 1, NATURE OF REC~UEST a, Unconditional request to rezone approximately 15 acres from R-1, Residential to M-i.~Light Industry to accommodate future industrial growth in Roanoke County. The specific property in question consists of a strip approximately 162~~ feet long and ~~?~] to 3~~U feet wide. No specific legal description of the property being rezoned has been provided. This is part of a larger tract, the balance of which is zoned M-~, Heavy Industry, and was formerly the site of a concrete fabricating company. The F,-i area now proposed for r-ezoning was designated to provide a buffer between the concrete company and adjoining residential areas. Buildings and structures from the concrete fabrication business remain on the M-2 zoned portion of the site, but have not been utilized for a number of years. ~, Attached vicinity map describes the location of the property. 2 , AF'F'L I CABLE REGULATIONS a, The M-i, Light Industry District permits a variety of industrial land uses including assembly of appliances and electronic devices. manufacturing of products from ceramics, plastics and other similar materials, as well as warehousing and veterinary hospitals. General commercial uses, including day care centers, direc±ly supportive of area industrial facilities are permitted as well, provided a special exception is granted, . At this time the land owner has not proffered any conditions which restrict future use of this site. In its review of this request, the Economic Development staff has suggested several proffers which would prohibit certain land uses on the site. The suggested proffers include restrictions of the following land uses: i. Automobile painting upholstering, repairing, rebuilding, reconditioning, body and fender work, truck. repairing or overhauling; ~. Manufacturing of pottery and figurines or other similar ceramic products: 3. Veterinary hospital and commercial kennels with exterior runs and yards; and' 4. Flea markets, unless a special exception has been granted by the Board of Supervisors. g. Seed and feed stores. b. At the time development of this parcel is proposed, site plan review would be required to ensure compliance with County regulations. ~~' %~T c SITE CHARACTERI5TICS ~. Topography: The majority of the site is relatively filat, e::cept along the west side, where a moderate slope rises to the rear of the adjoining residential properties. b. Ground Cover: The site is covered with grasses and brush, except for a strip varying in width from approximately 8!:r to ~r~i.a feet of mi::ed evergreen and deciduous trees along the western boundary adjacent to the adjoining residences. 4. AREA GHARACTEF;ISTICS a. Future Growth Priority: Situated within the Cave Spring Community Planning Area. The growth initiative for- this are is to stabilize growth. b. General area is a mi:~tur-e of single-family and multi-family residences, light and heavy/ industrial uses, and some commercial uses. 5. LAND USE IMPACT ASSESSMENT F;ating: Fate each factor according to the impact of the proposed action. Use a scale of 1 thirough 5. 1 = positive impact, 2 = negligible impact, = manageable impact, 4 = disruptive impact, 5 = severe impact, and N/A = not applicable. RATING FACTOR COMMENTS LAND USE COMF'AT I E+ I L I TY a. Comprehensive Flan: 1985 Comprehensive Development Flan has placed this area within a Principal Industrial land use category. The proposed rezoning from R-1, Residential to M-1. Light Industry is consistent with the land use ty_Qes_, - ._.. principals, and guidalinPS specified n~ the Principal Industrial category. Land uses encouraged within the Principal Industrial c~-+tegory include: Agricultural Industries; Conventional Industries; Industrial Parks; Mining. and E::traction; and Planned Employment Centers. Those land .uses permitted in the M-1. Light Industry zoning district are consistent with the land use categories described above, with the e:<ception of those uses related to automobile repair, veterinary hospitals and commercial kennels. In addition, the proposed rezoning is consistent with the Land Use Guidelines specified in the Principal Industrial category. Policy I-9 cioes suggest prohibiting industrial development adjacent to residential uses unless e:;ceptional design meas!.!res are applied to achieve compatibility. As this site abuts residential uses along the western boundary, such measures will_ be necessary to ensure compatibility. 4 b. Surro!.:nding Land: Immediately adjoining this site to the north and south are Light industrial uses, including the Southwest Industrial F'ar6:. To the east is the N R~ W rai 1 road , open space, and single f amily residences. The entire western border adjoins some twenty single-family residences. ~z-89~ ~ ~ +. c. Neighboring Area: The general area west of this site is developed in single-family and multi-family residential uses. ~?, and Cave Springs High School. The areas north and south of the site are in light and heavy industrial uses. East of the site. beyond the railroad, is open space and single-family residences. ~_ d. Site Layout: The site layout is unknown at this time, since no concept plan has been submitted. 2 e. Architecture: Unknown. 4 f. Screening and Landscaping: The area proposed for rezoning was retained in the R-i zoning district to serve as a buffer for adjoining vacant property that has since been developed with single-family residences. As previously discussed, Folicy I- 9 suggests that e::ceptional design measures are necessary to mitigate land ~.ise impacts when residential and industrial uses ar-e located adjar_ent to each other. One aspect of e::ceptional design is sufficient screening and buffering. Adequate screening and buffering can minimize impacts associated with ~ noise and visibility resulting from industrial land uses. -' ~~r Specifically, staff is recommending the property owner proffer ~~~:"~ as a minimum 1~?~?..foot buffer yard alcng the western property ?' boundaries. In addition, the e:;istinq vegetation should be retained, and supplemented whey-e necessary, in order to maintain the e:<isting screening of this site from ad.ioining residences. Amenities: F'ros ective amenities are __ P unknown , since no con~ept plan has been submitted. h. Natural Amenities: TRAFFIC i . Street Capacities: E::isting acce=_.=_ to the site is via Benois Road and Stark:e~/ Road. However, it i=_ anticipated at this time that Commonwealth Drive in the So!rthwest Industrial F'arF: will be e;rtended to serve this site, and will eventually be connected to Benois Road and po=_sibly Terminal Road. No existing right-of-way leads to this property from the residential areas to the west. According to Trip Generation by the Institute of Traffic Engineers, general light industrial uses generate 51.8 trips per day per acre, which would result in an additional 77U ADT on Benois Road. The number of daily trips on Benois Road in 198b was 784 ADT, while on Starkey Road (F:t . 9~=?4 ) the ADT was 8.7b9. The ADT on Commonwealth Drive was ~4~, while on Merriman, Starkey and Buck: Mountain Roads, the ADT"s range from ~4cji? to .w8~~ca. The intersection of Starkey Road and Buck: Mountain F;oad has been improved and the northern end of Starkey Road is to be widened to four lanes. Also, improvements to the railroad crossirq_ on Benois Road are in the Six-Year Road Improvement Program for 199:?-91. No other improvements to Benc,is Road are proposed at this time. 3 ~. Circulation: Unknown, since no concept plan has been submitted (see Street Capacities above). . .'7.....7L.'...i.r UTILITIES /~ .. Water: Public water will be provided to the southern property line of this property under an approved project to e;ttend a -yater line throughi the Southwest Industrial F'ark:. Currently, ic7pq gallons per minute fire flow is the ma:,imum available at this time, which may limit some types of light ind!~strial uses. :. Sever; Public sewer is available on the east side of the railroad track. and could be e;ztended by future property owners. ~~~ A I NAGE -. Basin: Located on a minor tributary of the Back: Creek: drainage basin. Storm water from this area would join runoff from Buck: Mountain north of Merriman Road in the vicinity of Fenn Forest Elementary School. Application of the proposed storm water management regulations could minimize adverse down stream for most storm events. -. Floodplain: Not located in a Federally designated flood plain or within a drainage basin e:;ceeding i~?~:? acres. ~JBLIC SERVICES ? _. Fire Protection: Within established service area. _. Rescue: Within established service area. N/A _ . F'ark:s and F;ecr-eation N1A --. Schools: N/A ' ;X BASE _. - Land and Improvement Value: - Taxable Gross Sales/Year: - Total Employees: - Total Revenue to the County!Year• Appro:•:imately -~~~ I RONMENT _. Air: ^ _ ldater: -~. Soils: - s.. Noise: Site design should include measures to mitigate any impacts associated with noise during both the construction and operation phases of any future use of this site. For e;;ample. site design should include earth berms and increased plantings trees and shrubs} to mitigate the effect of noise and light on adjacent residences. Staff s~:ggests that the property owner proffer conditions ensuring that sound levels do not a>:ceed bC? dE~_(A} when__measured at adjoining residences. :' signage: Since no specific proposal has been made for this site, signage is unk:no-vn. However as a general standard, sign should be limited to no more than 1.5 square feet of signage per linear foot of road frontage, and that each business shall be allowed a ma;<imum of :1r.~c~ square feet of .signage not to e:<ceed the signage permitted based on frontage. b. FLAN CQNSISTENCY This area is designated as Principal Industrial. _onsistent with the Comprehensive Flan map and design issues are addressed to mitigate impacts uses, as recommended in Policy I-9. ./ .~~~_ ~ P'etitioner's request is policies provided site on adjoining residential 7 . STAFF EVALIlAT I ON a. Strengths: (i) The proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive F'Ian map and policies. (2) A portion of the total tract has been used for industr-ial purposes. and,(?) Adjoining properties to the north and south are presently in industrial use. b. i~Jeaknesses: (i) The proposed rezoning is unconditional and offers no restr-ict.ions on future use of the site. Any use permitted in the M-i, Light INdustry District including veterinary hospitals and a~ltomobile repair and refurbishing facilii_ies could be located on this site. (^) No concept plan has been s~_ibmitted. ('~) Site is bor_,nded r_?n the west by single-family residences. c. F'roffer-s Suggested: (1) Staff recommends the property owner proffer cond.it.ions restricting future use of this site. Specifically, staff recommends the property owner proffer conditions prohibiting the following ~_tses from this site: (a) Automobile painting upholstering, repairing, rebuilding, reconditioning, bod;- and fender work: , truck: repairing or overhau 1 ing : (b) Manufacturinr; +~f potter, and fig..~rines or other- similar ceramic products; (c) Veterinary hospital and commercial kennels with e;:terior runs and yCrds; (d) Flea markets, unless a special exception has been granted by the Fsoard of Supervisors; and, {e) Seed and feed stores. ~) Sta.f f recommends +~he proper-t owner ~~r-nf for a minims lm iC?s? fac t b_~ft~er yard along the wYster-n property bn~_~ndar-ies to be ntherwis.e a•d~r,~ir~ist:eyed in cGnfinrmdnCk? with Section ^i-9? of the ZoninG C'~~din.ncc~. (~') Staff recommend= the prr~perty owner- proffer than the e;;i.sting vegetation shall. be retained within the jri~~lfoot. b~Ltffer-l -ord. .and supplemented where necessar~~ r to maintain the in nrde e:is±::i.nc; Screening of this site from adjoining residences. - {4) Ltaff suggests that the property owner- proffer conditions ensurine; that sound levels do not e;;c~~ed bC~ dS(A) :yhen mea=tired a.t adjoininU res.i~~n-c--~- . .. DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ~a ~ as g~8cu~cEr~NN`P~ A Btawi~iJ$tginning M E M O R A N D II M TO: Terry Harrington, Director of Planning & Zoning FROM: Timothy W. Gubala, Director of Economic Development DATE: September 25, 1989 SIIB.TECT: Suggested proffers related to the rezoning application for the Atlantic Concrete site Suggested proffers: 1. The property will not include permitted uses for: a. Automobile painting, upholstering, repairing, rebuilding, reconditioning, body and fender work, truck repairing or overhauling; b. Manufacturing of pottery and figurines or other similar ceramic products; c. Veterinary hospital and commercial kennels with exterior runs and yards; d. Flea markets, unless a special exception has been granted by the Board of Supervisors. e. Seed and feed stores. P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE .VIRGINIA 24018-0798 • (703) 772-2069 FAX. NO.: (703) 772-2030 -~'L.~ ~~ r~ ~' Site name: Phoenix Concrete Size: 34 acres Zoning: 1"~ Comprehensive Plan Designation: Principal Industrial Access: Benois~Road Water: Off site Sewer: Off site Availability: Owners are willing to allow Roanoke County to market and sell the property at a specified price per acre. Recommendation: Sewer to be extended to the site. Benois Road or new Terminal Road guarded RR grade crossing to be constructed from VDOT Secondary Road _ fund. (1993-94) Fiscal Impact: (1990) For water/sewer improvements and extension of Commornealth Drive (1993-94j For VDOT road improvements Date KeC.i Received Bys ~~, =- Case No. t • Ord. No.: ROANORB COUNTY REZONING APPLICATION 'y~i '",:"~ Phone: 1. Owner's Na~me : /j Address: /%v / J~x Sly ~~~~ ~-~~ ~ ZYJ! ~ 2. Applicant's Name: ~ ,U1~ ll~r~J~]~~S Phone' 7~2- 2005 Address:~C7 ~x L~ ~,~~~~.,, JA Lys ~s -c~7f$ 3. Location of Property: [~2Y10/S ~:y'~ Tax Map Number (s) : ~ ~ ~ +3~ 2- l- $ 7 ~d '" Z ~ 7. ~ ~pa~ 4. Magisterial District: L S Pro ert 3S• 31 ~~ a'~- r 5. Size of P Y 6. Existing Zoning: ~' ~ Existing Land Use: 1latic~ 7. Proposed Zoning: m ~~ tivioCu~sh~a~2 oCw ' Proposed Land Use: , ~, rnu s 8. Comprehensive Plan Designation: No 9. Are Conditions Proffered With This Request? Yes offers as a part of your applica- (If you are voluntarily offering Pz- ' tion, these proffers must be in writing. a member ~~~ a Planning Staff can assist you in the preparation of these pr 10. Value of Land and (Proposed) Buildings: 11. The Following ItemsA ulication Will NotiBe ~cceptedllf AnYnOfPThe e Check If Enclosed. pp Ite/ms Are Missing Or Incomplete: --A/--~- Letter of Application Concept Plan Metes and Bounds Description - t~ List of Adjacent Owners of Property (Attach Exhibit A) -~ Vicinity Map N ~ Application Fee Written Proffers Water and Sewer Application (If Applicable) 12. Signature Of Property Owner; Contract Purchaser, Or Owner's Agen / ~., S i nature Cc~ ~ ~~{~ '' Date g ,~u ~~ +EaQU/cEI~KN~~~ TO: PROM: DATBs g0&TECT ~OLt1lf1J Df 'LRDFIttII~iP DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT xsxoRASDOx ~. ~~ Terry Harrington, Director, Planning and Zoning Timothy Gubala, Director, Economic Development September 22, 1989 Rezoning application - Atlantic Concrete On behalf of the Board of Supervisors, I am submitting this application for the rezoning of approximately 15± acres from Single Family Residential District R-1 to Light Industrial District M-1. As you know, this property is one of several evaluated as part of the 1989 study of potential industrial sites that was initiated by the Board of Supervisors. The R1 designation was given to a portion of the land owned by Atlantic Concrete, Incorporated to provide a buffer to any future residential development. The remainder of the acreage in this tract is zoned M-2. By rezoning the property to M-1 Light Industrtentialt MC2~ usersprwhol mayu haveouad numbers ofbuoutdoor the po activities. Please note that this application does not include a Concept Plan nor a water and sewer application. Clifford Craig has been consulted extensively about this site and feels that water and sewer services could be extended to the site. The lack of a Concept Plan reflects the owners understanding of the ever changing business environment and would like the opportunity to market this site which is adjacent to the Southwest Industrial Park, as an entire tract of a subdividable tract depending on the needs of business. As you know, the Southwest Industrial Park is now completely sold out. As you also know, the Board of Supervisors-has authorized the extension of Commonwealth Drive through Southwest Industrial Park and to the property line of the site in question. By rezoning this property, the development that has been successful in Southwest Industrial Park will be able to continue in an appropriate surrounding. Finally, this is a request for a rezoning of a portion of a tract. The owner is having a metes and bounds description prepared and will forward this to your office when completed. Attachment P.O. BOX 29800 • ROANOKE .VIRGINIA 24018-0798 • (703) 772-2069 FAX. NO.: (703) 772-2030 0.~-8~-~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, DECEMBER 19, 1989 ORDINANCE TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF 11.848 ACRES OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED AT THE END OF BENOIS ROAD IN THE CAVE SPRING MAGIS- TERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFI- CATION OF R1 TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF M1 FOR INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT WITH CONDITIONS UPON THE APPLICATION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA WHEREAS, by Resolution 91289-4 the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, initiated amendments to the Comprehensive Plan and to the classifications of certain real estate located in Roanoke County to serve the public purposes of the County as required by public necessity, convenience, general welfare, and good zoning practice in order to implement the recommendations of the Economic Development Action Plan for FY 1989-90; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on October 24, 1989, and the second reading and public hearing was held on December 19, 1989; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on November 9, 1989; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing 11.848 acres, as described herein, owned by Atlantic Concrete and located at the end of Benois Road in the Cave Spring Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of R-1, Single-family Residential District, to the l...~ ,,~ zoning classification of M1, Light Industrial District. 2. That the Board initiated the application to change the zoning classification of this real estate located in Roanoke County to serve the public purposes of the County as required by public necessity, convenience, general welfare, and good zoning practice to implement the recommendations of the Economic Development Action Plan for FY 1989-90. 3. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: Beginning at a point designated No. 1, being the north- westerly corner of an 11.848-acre tract herein-described, said point being corner to the property of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, and on the line of Lot 6, Block G, Section 3, Penn Forest; thence leaving said Point of Beginning and following a line between Section 3, Penn Forest, and the property herein-des- cribed, N. 36° 51' E. 1326.2 feet to Point No. 2; thence continuing with Penn Forest, Section 5, and the property herein-described, N. 34° 00' E. 195.00 feet to Point No. 3; thence continuing with Section 5, Penn Forest, N. 38° 2 5' E . 4 67. 1 feet to Point No . 4 , corner to the property of Harold E. Rose, et al.; thence with the Rose property and the property herein-described, S. 67° 11' E. 110 feet to Point No. 5; thence following the zoning line between R-1 and M-2 , property of Atlantic Concrete, S . 19° 44' 07" W. 367.26 feet to Point No. 6; thence continuing with said zoning line, S. 21° 17' W. 135.00 feet to Point No. 7; thence S. 35° 11' 04" W. 1554.74 feet to Point No. 8 on the line of the property of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia; thence with the Board of Supervisors property and the property herein-described, N. 49° 13' W. 300 feet to the Point of Beginning and being a parcel of land containing 11.848 acres, being zoned R-1 and being as shown on zoning plat for A. V. Criss Sr. Trust by T. P. Parker & Son, Engineers and Surveyors dated October 25, 1989. 4. That Atlantic Concrete, as owner of this real estate, has voluntarily proffered in writing the following conditions which the Board of Supervisors hereby accepts: (1) The property will not include permitted uses for: (a) Automobile painting, upholstering, repairing, rebuilding, reconditioning, body and fender ~.~.8~_~ work, truck repairing or overhauling; (b) Manufacturing of pottery and figurines or other similar ceramic products; (c) Veterinary hospital and commercial kennels with exterior runs and yards; (d) Flea Markets, unless a special exception has been granted by the Board of Supervisors; and (e) Seed and feed stores. (2) A minimum 100 foot buffer yard along the western property boundaries to be otherwise administered in conformance with Section 21-92 of the Zoning Ordinance; that existing vegeta- tion be retained within the 100 foot buffer yard, and supplemented where necessary in order to maintain the existing screening of this site from adjoining residences. (3) Sound levels shall not exceed 60 dba when measured at adjoining residences. (4) Hours of operation shall be limited from 6:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m. on this property. 5. That the effective date of this ordinance shall be December 19, 1989. ~uiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiigieii~i~~iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiU APPEARANCE RE VEST _ Q __ AGENDA ITEM NO. /z- ~ 9 -- ~ - - ~~ _ SUBJECT ~' ~ ~ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supex~isors to recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so that I ma comment.WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRE ~ "c SS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES __ LISTED BELOW. • Each speaker will be iven between three to five minutes to comment g whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to __ do otherwise. • S Bakers will be limited to a resentation of their oint of view nl P p p o y. Ques- bons of cl ' 'cation may be enterEained by the Chairman. • All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtes at all times. __ _ Y • Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. • INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION c FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO DEPUTY CLERK NAME ~~~- ~' ~ ~'/ ~ :~ S -_ ADDRESS 3S' l ~ /~(~ ~-d~, ,,., C ~,,-- ~- ~ s G~.o ~ ~. -_ _- PHONE~~>~~'~' - 3 z 4~ 7 11~iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiniiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiitiiiiitiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiitll i ~~~' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, DECEMBER 19, 1989 ORDINANCE 121989-20 TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF APPROXIMATELY 125 ACRES OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED SOUTH OF ROUTES 11 AND 460, SOUTH AND WEST OF BARLEY DRIVE AND THE N&W RAILWAY IN THE CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DIS- TRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION A-1MH TO M-1 FOR INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT WITH CONDITIONS UPON THE APPLICATION OF THE BOARD OF SUPER- VISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA. WHEREAS, by Resolution 91289-4 the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, initiated amendments to the Comprehensive Plan and to the classifications of certain real estate located in Roanoke County to serve the public purposes of the County as required by public necessity, convenience, general welfare, and good zoning practice to implement the recommendations of the Economic Development Action Plan for FY 1989-90; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on October 24, 1989, and the second reading and public hearing was held on December 19, 1989; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on November 9, 1989; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing approximately 125 acres, as described herein, owned by Salem West Corporation and located south of Routes 11 and 460, south and west of Barley Drive and the N&W Railway in the a Catawba Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification A-1MH, Agricultural Manufacturerd Housing District, to the zoning classification of M-1, Light Industrial District, for industrial development. 2. That the Board initiated the application to change the zoning classification of this real estate located in Roanoke County to serve the public purposes of the County as required by public necessity, convenience, general welfare, and good zoning practice to implement the recommendations of the Economic Development Action Plan for FY 1989-90. 3. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: Beginning at Corner 23, an iron pin located in an old fence line and being the common corner with the south line of a 50 foot right-of-way and also, being a common corner with Daniel Wentworth Richards; thence with the south line of said right-of-way in an easterly direction N. 86° 39' 49" E. 951.31 feet in all to corner 24, an iron pin; thence continuing with the east line in a northerly line N. 10° 51' 17" W. 837.94 feet to corner 25, an iron pin; thence leaving said 50 foot right-of- way and with property of Daniel Wentworth Richards, deceased (Deed Book 869, page 171) ; thence in an easterly direction 74° 36' 05" E. 1,493.81 feet to corner 26, an iron pin; thence N. 30° 25' 23" 206.00 feet; thence N. 17° 20' 23" E. 263.00 feet; thence S. 10° 55' S7" E. 2,192.42 feet (along zoning line) bearing left of corner 16 and an iron pin; thence continuing in a westerly direction S. 13° 45' 07" W. 1,192.90 feet to corner 17; thence to 18 (maple snag) N. 69° 45' 04" W. ; thence N. 76° 46' 26" W. 1,226.95 feet passing through a gum tree; thence N. 83° 29' 15" W. 1,52.54 feet to corner 20 and existing iron pin; thence N. 3° 16' 13" W. to corner 21 and existing iron pin; thence N. 88° 55' 47' E. 433.61 feet to corner 22 and white oak tree at spring; thence N. 7° 14' S3" W. 629.52 feet to the place of beginning. 3. That Salem-West Corporation, as owner of this real estate, has voluntarily proffered in writing the following conditions which the Board of Supervisors hereby accepts: (1) The following uses shall be excluded from any development at this site: (a) Automobile painting, upholstering, repairing, rebuilding, reconditioning, body and fender work, truck repairing or overhauling; (b) Manufacturing of pottery and figurines or other similar ceramic products; (c) Veterinary hospital and commercial kennels with exterior runs and yards; (d) Flea Markets, unless a special exception has been granted by the Board of Supervisors; and (e) Seed and feed stores. (2) No industrial access shall be acquired from Yale Drive. 4. That the effective date of this ordinance shall be Decmeber 19, 1989. On motion of Supervisor McGraw, seconded by Supervisor Robers, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisor Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Brenda J. Hol on, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Development & Inspections Terry Harrington, Director, Planning John Willey, Director, Real Estate Assessment Paul Mahoney, County Attorney S ' ai ~ ~ ~ PETITIONER: ROANORE QOtJN'i'Y BOARD OF SUPERVISORS/SALEM WEST ~ ,;Z ~~'.._ ~' CASE Nt~lBER: 42-11/89 Planning Commission Hearing Date: November 9, 1989 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: November 28, 1989 A. REQUEST Petition of Roanoke County Board of Supervisors to rezone approximately 125 acres from A-1MEi to M-1 for industrial development, located south of Routes 11/460, south and west of Barley Drive, Catawba Magisterial District. B. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION There was no opposition to the request. C. SIGNIFICANT IMPACT FACPORS 1. Comprehensive Plan: 1985 Comprehensive Development Plan has placed this area within a Development land use category. Light manufacturing, warehousing and wholesale uses are prohibited and industrial park uses are discouraged in Development areas. The Development designation is not appropriate for industrial uses and a land use amendment will be required: The Principal Industrial designation delineates confined areas distributed throughout urbanizing sectors of the County where industrial sites may be clustered. The petitioner intends to submit a request to amend the Future Land Use Plan from Development to Principal Industrial to accambdate any light industrial uses which may be proposed should this rezoning request be approved. Staff analysis of petitioner's proposed amendment to the Future Land Use Plan map will be conducted upon receipt of this amendment request. 2. Site Layout: Dependent upon concept plan, as yet unsubmitted. 3. Amenities: Characteristics of parking facilities dependent upon concept plan--unavailable at this time. 4. Street Capacities: 1986 ADT (US 460): 7,595. 1987 accident: Five from VA 777 to VA 927 (1.16 mile). Light industrial uses may generate up to 50 trip-ends per acre. Petitioner should investigate likelihood of VDOT industrial access appropriations for this site. 5. Circulation: Engineering staff recommends Yale Drive (secondary local street serving Glen Forest Subdivision west of subject site) not be used as industrial access. Major improvements will be necessary to dirt access road intersecting at US 11/460 and Frontage 620. A 50 foot wide deeded easement is the only access currently available to subject site. Widening of this access and major improvements at its intersection with US 11/460 imperative. Interior post-development patterns unknown. 6. Air: Site design measures should minimize dust problems encountered during construction and operation of all site facilities, including roads. Dust mitigation techniques should be employed to protect adjacent properties. 7. Water: Potential pollution impacts unknown. 8. Noise: Site design measures should minimize noise problems encountered during construction and operation of all site facilities, including roads. Noise sugg~ ts1Oanmaxcin~uuln o~s6~h~.i~ld be employed to protect adjacent properties. Staff 1 1 ® ~ . - ~a•~"en D. PROFFE~2ID OONDITIONS No proffered conditions had been offered at the time of the Commission public hearing. Mr. Gubala presented to, and discussed with, the Planning Commission potential proffers and indicated a willingness to approach the property owner to request the proffers suggested by the Planning Commission. The following are proffers suggested by the Planning Commission: 1. The following uses shall be excluded from any development at this site: automobile painting, upholstering, repairing, rebuilding, reconditioning, body and fender work, truck repairing or overhauling; manufacturing of pottery and figurines or other similar ceramic products; veterinary hospital and commercial kennels with exterior runs and yards; flea markets, unless a special exception has been granted by the Board of Supervisors; seed and feed stores. 2. No industrial access shall be acquired from Yale Drive. 3. One stormwater management facility shall be constructed serving the entire site. 4. Signage shall be limited to 1.5 sq.ft. per 1 ft. of street frontage up to a maximum of 300 sq.ft. per business. 5. Type E screening and buffering shall be installed per ordinance. All parking areas shall be screened per § 21-92D(c)7. 6. Noise levels shall be not exceed 60 dbA measured at adjacent property lines. 7. Dust minimization measures will be employed during the construction and operation of all on-site facilities, including access road(s). E. COMA4ISSIONER'S MOTION, VOTE AND REASON Mr. Gordon moved to approve the petition contingent upon the formal receipt of the above proffers. The motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Massey, Gordon, Robinson, Witt NAYS: None ABSE[~: Winstead F. DISSENTING PERSPDCTIVE None. G. ATTACEIlMENI'S Concept Plan (8~" x 11") Vicinity Map (8~" x 11") Staff Report ~/ ' / Other Terrance H~'f~rington, retary Roanoke County Plann g Commission ,~ -_ STAFF REPORT /~ 8~ _.,~ CASE NUMBERt 42-11/89 PETITIONERS ROANORE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS SALEM WEST CORP. REVIEWED BYt TIM BEARD DATSs NOVEMBER 9, 1989 Petition of Roanoke County Board of Supervisors to rezone approximately 125 acres from A-1MH to M-1 for industrial development, located south of Routes 11/460, south and west of Barley Drive and the N&W Railway,. Catawba Magisterial District. 1. NATURE OF REQUEST a. Unconditional request to permit owners to market two existing tracts for industrial purposes. b. Attached survey and vicinity map describe proposal more fully. 2. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS a. M-1 zoning permits a variety of light industrial uses. Petitioner has indicated a willingness on the owners' part to exclude several normally permitted M-1 uses. (However, these proffers are not acceptable nor enforceable unless submitted in writing by Salem West Corporation.) b. VDOT commercial entrance permit required. c. Site plan review required to ensure compliance with County regulations. 3. SITE CHARACTERISTICS a. Topography: Flat to gently rolling (08-108 slope) throughout majority of site. Moderate to severe slope (108-20+$) approaching southern boundary of site. b. Ground Cover: Generally cleared (approximately 608 of site area); mixed hardwoods dominate southern and western border areas. Orchards formerly occupied northern half of site. Scattered rock outcroppings present. 4. AREA CHARACTERISTICS a. Future Growth Priority: Situated within the Glenvar Community Planning Area. Designated as a high growth area; currently receiving most urban services. b. General area is developed with institutional, industrial, general retail and scattered single-family residential uses. 5. LAND USE IMPACT ASSESSMENT Rating: Rate each factor according to the impact of the proposed action. Use a scale of 1 through 5. 1 = positive impact, 2 = negligible impact, 3 =manageable impact, 4 = disruptive impact, 5 = severe impact, and N/A = not applicable. RATING FACTOR COMMENTS LAND USE COMPATIBILITY 4 a. Comprehensive Plan: 1985 Comprehensive Development Plan has placed this area within a Development land use category. Light manufacturing, warehousing and wholesale uses are prohibited The industrial park uses are discouraged in Development areas. Development designation is not appropriate for industrial uses and a land use amendment will be required. The petitioner intends to submit a request to amend the Future Land Use Plan from Development to Principal Industrial to accommodate any light industrial uses which may be proposed should this rezoning request be approved. . ~L~ ;,~' The Principal Industrial designation delineates confined areas distributed throughout urbanizing sectors of the County where industrial sites may be clustered. Staff analysis of petitioner's proposed amendment to the Future Land Use Plan map will be conducted upon receipt of this amendment request. 3 b. Surrounding Land: Woodland, scattered single-family residential, light industrial. 3 c. Neighboring Area: Woodland, scattered single-family residential, light industrial, general retail. 5 d. Site Layout: Dependent upon concept plan, as yet unsubmitted. See suggested proffers. N A e. Architecture: Building design unknown. 3 f. Screening and Landscape: Per ordinance. See suggested proffers. 5 g. Amenities: Characteristics of parking facilities dependent upon concept plan--unavailable at this time. 3 h. Natural Features: A subsurface 1985 soils investigation performed by a certified professional soil scientist found a deep well drained yellowish red clay and numerous sinkholes on-site. USDA Soil Conservation Service determined surface soils to be predominantly silt loam. TRAFFIC 4 i. Street Capacities: 1986 ADT (US 460): 7,595. 1987 accident: Five from VA 777 to VA 927 (1.16 mile). Light industrial uses may generate up to 50 trip-ends per acre. Petitioner should investigate likelihood of VDOT industrial access appropriations for this site. 4 j. Circulation: Engineering staff recommends Yale Drive (secondary local street serving Glen Forest Subdivision west of subject site) not be used as industrial access. Major improvements will be necessary to dirt access road intersecting at US 11/460 and Frontage 620. A 50 foot wide deeded easement is the only access currently available to subject site. Widening of this access and major improvements at its intersection with US 11/460 imperative.. Interior post-development patterns unknown. UTILITIES 2 k. Water: Indirectly available at US 11/460 north of site via 16" Big Hill main. Significant line extension distance required. 2 1. Sewer: No existing service. Extension scheduled for mid 1990s, from 36" Roanoke River interceptor, 4,000 feet east of site. DRAINAGE 2 m. Basin: Callahan Branch. No problems noted. 3 n. Floodplain: Site is not located within a federally designated flood hazard area. Development review division has suggested that effective stormwater management may be achieved by the con- struction of a single detention facility serving entire site. PUBLIC SERVICES 2 0. Fire Protection: Within established service standard. 2 p. Rescue: Within estab~.ished service standard. q. Parks and Recreation: '.-. N A r. School: ~~~~~ ~' TAX BASE 1 s. - Land and Improvement Value: (Existing) approximately $650,000 - Taxable Gross Sales/Year: - Total Employees: - Total revenue to the County/Year: Approximately $934,375 (unimproved real estate only) ENVIRONMENT 4 t. Air: Site design measures should minimize dust problems encountered during construction and operation of all site facilities, including roads. Dust mitigation techniques should be employed to protect adjacent properties. See proffers. 4 u. Water: Potential pollution impacts unknown. 2 v. Soils:. 4 w. Noise: Site design measures should minimize noise problems encountered during construction and operation of all site facilities, including roads. Noise mitigation techniques should be employed to protect adjacent properties. Staff suggests a maximum of 60 dba. See proffers. 2 x. Signage: See suggested proffers. 6. PLAN CONSISTENCY This area is designated as Development. Industrial uses such as those permitted in the M-1, Light Industrial District are inconsistent with land use policies and guidelines relating to Development designated areas. 7. STAFF EVALUATION a. Strengths: (1) Positive potential impact on tax base. (2) Site offers significant acreage and rail access. (3) Site offers potential employment base for predicted long-term West County population increase. b. Weaknesses: (1) Proposal is inconsistent with Development land use policies and guidelines. (2) No concept plan has been submitted. (3) Lack of proffered conditions. (4) Proposal presents potential for greatly increased traffic on US 11/460. c. Proffers suggested: (1) The following uses shall be excluded from any development at this site: automobile painting, upholstering, repairing, rebuilding, reconditioning, body and fender work, truck repairing or overhauling; manufacturing of pottery and figurines or other similar ceramic products; veterinary hospital and commercial kennels with exterior runs and yards; flea markets, unless a special exception has been granted by the Board of Supervisors; seed and feed stores. (2) No industrial access shall be acquired f rom Yale Drive. t3) One stormwater management facility shall be constructed serving the entire site. (4) Signage shall be limited to 1.5 sq.f t. per 1 f t. of street f rontage up to a maximum of 300 sq. ft. per business. (5) Type E screening and buffering shall be installed per ordinance. All parking areas shall be screened per S 21-92D(c)7. (6) Noise levels shall be not exceed 60 dba measured at adjacent property lines. t7) Dust minimization measures will be employed during the construction and operation of all on-site facilities, including access road(s). r'.. 1. 2. ROANOI~ COUNTY REZONING APPLICATION Owner's Name : ~ Phone : 3~~ "s~~3 Address : P P ('So~c 85q~ 1~~ ~ 2 ~~ ~ y Applicant's Name:~l9~ ~~o~av~~~ Phone: Address: 3. Locatio Tax Map n of Property: ~i~-~ ~ lam''/ l (~y6 ~ V-~ ~Lc ~i ~'lu~ 2A~ Number (s) : ~ ~. 0 2 -? - ~p~+~-- ate! S'i7 ~ ~Z 4. Magisterial Distr 5. Size of Property: 6. Existing Zoning: /~~- m H Existing Land Use: U A ~~ ^~~ 7. Proposed Zoning: ,~ Nt~UST~'(~IL f~ i8'T~2t~7~ /j'!' / Proposed Land Use: ~Yi1 ~US'~i9L ~e y~~~ti~~ 8. Comprehensive Plan Designation: Ptir-~ ~1^o~S~ 9. Are Conditions Proffered With This Request? Yes / No (If you are voluntarily offering proffers as a part of your appl~ca- tlon, these proffers must be 3n Writing. Jul member of the Planning Staff can assist you ~n the preparation of these proffers.) 10. Value of Land and (Proposed] Buildings: il. The Following Items l+~ust Be Submitted With This Application. Please Check If Enclosed. Application will Not Be Accepted If Any Of These Items Are Kissing Or Incomplete: Letter of Application Concept Plan Metes and Bounds Description List of Adjacent Owners of Property (Attach Exhibit A) Vicinity Map Application Fee Written Proffers Water and Sewer Application (If Applicable) iZ. Signature Of Property Owner, Contract Purchaser, Or Owner's Agent: Signature • W Date ?~ Date KeC.: Received eys Case No.t Ord. No.s __ C~o ~~»w /~odt4 ~ `~ D~.r~ ~8 +FSQUICENTENN~'~ A BswwijrrlBcgimriMg X1,51 .. ~^~' ,~ . ? ~~~~~ SEP 26 egg 9 DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT P~~~~U~ Z~~i:~~U u sr{i1i~T$ h14~ V= ~.::(~nt C~J~+IY TO= Terry Harrington, Director, .Planning and Zoning FROMs Timothy W. Gubala, Director, Economic Development DAT$: September 25, 1989 BIIBJ$CTs Rezoning application - Salem West Corporation On behalf of the Board of Supervisors, I am filing an application of rezoning to Industrial District M-1 for approximately 125 acres of land owned by Salem West Corporation in the Glenvar area of Roanoke County. Although the land is designated as Principal Industrial in the Comprehensive Plan, only a portion of it The actually zoned Industrial M-2. The remainder is zoned A1MH. property owners will seek to market this property for industrial development purposes upon achieving a successful rezoning. public utilities serving the site include water in Route 11/460. Sewer service is off site to the east in the Roanoke River Interceptor at Garman Road behind Kroger. The utility director expects to extend public sewer to this site by the mid 1990's. An existing access road extending to Route 11/460 will have to be upgraded to accommodate future industrial traffic. Proffered conditions offered for this rezoning include: Limitations on permitted uses in M-1 to include: a. Automobile painting, upholstering, repairing, rebuilding, reconditioning, body and fender work, truck repairing or overhauling; b. Manufacture of pottery and figurines or other similar ceramic products; c. .Veterinary hospital and commercial kennels with exterior runs and yards; d. Flea markets, unless a special exception has been granted by the Board of Supervisors. e. Seed and feed stores. Please contact me should you have any questions. P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE . VIRGINIA 24018-0798 (703) 772-2069 FAX. NO.: (703) 772-2030 ' ~~ ~• • ,~, _ r. ar` ~r~ r M~• 4w .rw ~ ~Q~ w ~ ~ 1 `~Oyp '~~ lr~~ ~ ~ ~0. +~ t ~~ ~ • / . ~'y ~ ! 1 i~ ~ r / ~~s ~ .P A,'!` ~ ` ~ r~ T~ ~ r,~'~r0 q'~ ~ ~ ?V Y ~ • ^,T tih w~ •,~ ~.~ J A ,~ A 4 y .~ ~" . ` ~ ~ r°'~w ~ a, o "• ~ ' ~ ~ oa s. c~' ~ w~ o ~,~ Q ~, ~ I : ,, pay ,~'!" i 1 ~ ? a !!~ r -0 ' X00. Y Y M. ~~ ~ > s e r ~ ~ f ~ ~' ~. / n !~ ~ + ~ ~~tw ~~ •~ ~ T ~ ~ ~ 9to .. iw ~ C lei 1~~ ~ A Nom' V N O 0©~~., ~ S~ r. T as z• z z 4tP~ `~~~ ~ ~ ., N H i ~ o~ g is ~' ~7 ~ ' ! .~ . ~ O •~ ~ ~ ! J.~p lOOf~ ~ ~`~ a ~t,~ tT a~ $M 0~ Or t . ~ • ~a. •~ . ~ ~ ~~,, ~ ~ , ~`~Z w ~ ~ F C /• '~ Site name: Salem West Size: 165 acres Zoning: K2, Ki, l+~ Comprehensive plan Designation: Principal Industrial Access: Route 11/460 Water: Off site Sewers Off site Availability: Property is available for sale. Recommendation: Extend sewernservicestoesite.i Fiscal Impact: 1994 for sewer improvements ~ ~~ ~.~. ~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, DECEMBER 19, 1989 ORDINANCE TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF APPROXIMATELY 125 ACRES OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED SOUTH OF ROUTES 11 AND 460, SOUTH AND WEST OF BARLEY DRIVE AND THE N&W RAILWAY IN THE CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION A-1MH TO M-1 FOR IN- DUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT WITH CONDITIONS UPON THE APPLICATION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA. WHEREAS, by Resolution 91289-4 the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, initiated amendments to the Comprehensive Plan and to the classifications of certain real estate located in Roanoke County to serve the public purposes of the County as required by public necessity, convenience, general welfare, and good zoning practice to implement the recommendations of the Economic Development Action Plan for FY 1989-90; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on October 24, 1989, and the second reading and public hearing was held on December 19, 1989; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on November 9, 1989; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing approximately 125 acres, as described herein, owned by Salem West Corporation and located south of Routes 11 and 460, south and west of Barley Drive and the N&W Railway in the Catawba Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification A-1MH, Agricultural Manufacturerd Housing District, to the zoning classification of M-1, Light Industrial District, for industrial development. 2. That the Board initiated the application to change the zoning classification of this real estate located in Roanoke County to serve the public purposes of the County as required by public necessity, convenience, general welfare, and good zoning practice to implement the recommendations of the Economic Development Action Plan for FY 1989-90. 3. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: Beginning at Corner 23, an iron pin located in an old fence line and being the common corner with the south line of a 50 foot right-of-way and also, being a common corner with Daniel Wentworth Richards; thence with the south line of said right-of-way in an easterly direction N. 86° 39' 49" E. 951.31 feet in all to corner 24, an iron pin; thence continuing with the east line in a northerly line N. 10° 51' 17" W. 837.94 feet to corner 25, an iron pin; thence leaving said 50 foot right-of- way and with property of Daniel Wentworth Richards, deceased (Deed Book 869, page 171) ; thence in an easterly direction 74° 36' 05" E. 1,493.81 feet to corner 26, an iron pin; thence N. 30° 25' 23" 206.00 feet; thence N. 17° 20' 23" E. 263.00 feet; thence S. 10° 55' S7" E. 2,192.42 feet (along zoning line) bearing left of corner 16 and an iron pin; thence continuing in a westerly direction S. 13° 45' 07" W. 1,192.90 feet to corner 17; thence to 18 (maple snag) N. 69° 45' 04" W. ; thence N. 76° 46' 26" W. 1,226.95 feet passing through a gum tree; thence N. 83° 29' 15" W. 1,52.54 feet to corner 20 and existing iron pin; thence N. 3° 16' 13" W. to corner 21 and existing iron pin; thence N. 88° 55' 47' E. 433.61 feet to corner 22 and white oak tree at spring; thence N. 7° 14' 53" W. 629.52 feet to the place of beginning. 3. That Salem-West Corporation, as owner of this real estate, has voluntarily proffered in writing the following conditions which the Board of Supervisors hereby accepts: (1) The following uses shall be excluded from any development at this site: (a) Automobile painting, upholstering, repairing, rebuilding, reconditioning, body and fender work, truck repairing or overhauling; (b) Manufacturing of pottery and figurines or other similar ceramic products; (c) Veterinary hospital and commercial kennels with exterior runs and yards; (d) Flea Markets, unless a special exception has been granted by the Board of Supervisors; and (e) Seed and feed stores. (2) No industrial access shall be acquired from Yale Drive. 4. That the effective date of this ordinance shall be Decmeber 19, 1989. ~~ ~ ~ c~~ ! J, ,~`~ pEC 20 ~a~q t0~'•E::G & 6tAC~ P~K1i~G ~~~ ~~zY SALEM-WEST CORPORATION ` P. 0. BOR 8597 ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24014 18 December 1989 Mr. Terrance Harrington, Secretary Roanoke County Planning Commission P. 0. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0799 ~ ~~ ~ Re: Rezoning Approximately 125 Acres Dear Mr. Harrington: We advise that the first and second proffers noted in the Staff Report, dated November 1989, Par. 7.c. are acceptable by Salem-West Corporation. These proffers are: 1. The following uses shall be excluded from any development at this site: automobile painting, upholstering, repairing, rebuilding, reconditioning, body and fender work, truck repairing or overhauling; manufacturing of pottery and figurines or other similar ceramic products; veterinary hospital and commercial kennels with exterior runs and yards; flea markets, unless a special exception has been granted by the Board of Supervisors; seed and feed stores. 2. No industrial access shall be acquired from Yale Drive. We intend to abide by all ordinances and regulations. Very truly yours, SALEM-WEST CORPORATION o. ~~ , Elmer 0. Rodes, Jr. Secretary-Treasurer cc: Executive Committee ~ 1 r P N., n {':. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, DECEMBER 19, 1989 ORDINANCE 121989-21 TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF APPROXIMATELY 19 ACRES OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED IN THE HOLLINS MAGIS- TERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFI- CATION OF Al TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF M1 FOR INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT WITH CONDITIONS UPON THE APPLICATION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA WHEREAS, by Resolution 91289-4 the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, initiated amendments to the Comprehensive Plan and to the classifications of certain real estate located in Roanoke County to serve the public purposes of the County as required by public necessity, convenience, general welfare, and good zoning practice in order to implement the recommendations of the Economic Development Action Plan for FY 1989-90; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on November 28, 1989, and the second reading and public hearing was held on December 19, 1989; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on December 5, 1989; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing approximately 19 acres--a 6.6 acre tract located south of the terminus of Friendship Lane and an 11.3 acre tract adjacent to the northeast boundary of ITT and approximately 75 feet northeast from the end of Lila Drive, both tracts as described ~, herein, owned by Raymond B. and Hazel H. Huffman and located in the Hollins Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of Al, Agricultural District, to the zoning class- ification of M1, Light Industrial District. 2. That the Board initiated the application to change the zoning classification of this real estate located in Roanoke County to serve the public purposes of the County as required by public necessity, convenience, general welfare, and good zoning practice to implement the recommendations of the Economic Development Action Plan for FY 1989-90. 3. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: Beginning at an iron pin on the south side of Lila Drive (Virginia Route 5018) 973.5' east of Plantation Road (Virginia Route 115); thence with the south side of Lila Drive N. 71° 43' 12" E. 51.07' to a point; thence leaving Lila Drive through the property of Raymond B. and Hazel H. Huffman the following courses: S. 30° 00' 34" E. 242.03' to a point; N. 62° 46' 20" E. 326.72' to a point; N. 77° 32' 12" E. 130.14' to a point in the center of an existing 20' right-of-way; thence along the centerline of said 20' right-of-way the following courses: S. 33° 47' 29" E. 33.56' to a point; S. 47° 32' 39" E. 39.68' to a point; S. 25° 32' 39" E. 41.05' to a point; thence with the west line of John H. and Cynthia H. Huffman S. 25° 32' 39" E. 451.76' to a point; thence through the property of Raymond B. and Hazel H. Huffman S. 28° 19' 29" E. 467.66' to an iron pin; thence with said Huffman and the north line of Rajesh R. Desai the following courses: S. 79° 27' 31" W. 436.40' to an iron pin; S. 64° 07' 31" W. 51.16' to an iron pin; thence with said Huffman and the east line of Dairymen, Inc. and Interna- tional Telephone and Telegraph Corporation N. 30° 00' 34" W., a total distance of 1188.46' passing an iron pin at 489.77' to the point of beginning and containing 11.349 acres as shown on plat by Balzer & Associates Inc. for Raymond B. and Hazel H. Huffman, dated October 26, 1989. and 2 Beginning at an iron pin on the south side of Friendship Lane (Virginia Secondary Route 1895) 1400'± east of Plantation Road (Virginia Route 115); thence with the south side of Friendship Lane N. 49° 34' 24" E. 242.55' to a point; thence leaving Friendship Lane and with the south line of Danny R. Myers N. 61° 02' 10" E. 98.84' to a point in the center of Carvin's Creek; thence with the centerline of Carvin's Creek the following courses: S. 38° 42' 10" E. 258.18' to a point; S. 25° 32' 43" E. 202.90' to a point; S. O1° 28' 04" E. 30.29' to a point; S. 32° 09' 10" E. 324.71' to a point; thence leaving Carvin's Creek a line through the property of Raymond B. and Hazel H. Huffman S. 61° 00' 55" W. 371.93' to an iron pin; thence with said Huffman and the east line of AMP, Incorporated N. 28° 59' 05" W. 760.00' to the point of beginning and containing 6.626 acres as shown on plat by Balzer & Associates, Inc. for Raymond B. and Hazel H. Huffman, dated October 25, 1989. 4. That Raymond B. Huffman and Hazel H. Huffman, as owners of this real estate, have voluntarily proffered in writing the follow- ing conditions which the Board of Supervisors hereby accepts: (1) The property will not include permitted uses for: (a) Automobile painting, upholstering, repairing, rebuilding, reconditioning, body and fender work, truck repairing or overhauling; (b) Seed and feed stores; (c) Veterinary hospital and commercial kennels with exterior runs and yards; and (d) Commercial laundry and dry cleaning plants; (e) Flea markets - inside a structure only - provided a special exception has been granted by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. (2) Ensure Type E screening and buffering along those boundaries which abut residential uses. (3) Sound levels shall not exceed 60 dba when measured at adjoining residences. 3 t (5) No outside, nighttime uses after 11 p.m, will be allowed in the M1 District. 5. That the effective date of this ordinance shall be December 19, 1989. On motion of Supervisor Nickens with Proffer #4 deleted, seconded by Supervisor McGraw, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisor McGraw, Robers, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None ABSTAIN: Supervisor Johnson A COPY TESTE: ~~~ ~ Brenda J. Ho ton, Deputy Clerk cc: File Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Arnold Covey, Director, Development & Inspections Terry Harrington, Director, Planning John Willey, Director, Real Estate Assessment Paul Mahoney, County Attorney PETITIONER: ROANOKE QOLTNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS/HUFFNIAN CASE NtlN1BER: 47-12/89 Planning Commission Hearing Date: December 5, 1989 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: December 19, 1989 A. REQUEST Petition of Roanoke County Board of Supervisors to rezone approximately 19 acres from A-1 to M-1 for industrial development; one tract located south of Friendship Lane; one tract adjacent to the northeast boundary of ITT and approximately 75 feet northeast fran the end of Lila Drive, Hollins Magisterial District. B. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION There was no opposition to the request. C. SIGNIFICANT IMPACT FACTORS 1. Site Layout: Unknown due to lack of a concept plan. 2. Amenities: Unknown due to lack of a concept plan. 3. Circulation: Direct access to these sites can be gained from either Friendship Lane (Site A) or Lila Drive (Site B). Both streets currently serve both commercial/industrial and residential land uses. VDOT advises additional demand along Friendship Lane will require upgrading the facility. VDOT further states there are not sufficient funds in the current Six-Year Plan to fund even existing proposals. An alternative method of financing will be needed to cover additional projects such as this. Due to lack of a concept plan, staff cannot assess on-site circulation alternatives. 4. Air: Site design should include measures to mitigate dust during both the construction and operation phases of any future use of this site. Staff suggests the property owner proffer that dust mitigation measures will be employed during both phases described above. The dust mitigation measures should negate any impacts that dust may have on adjoining residences. 5. water: Since this is an unconditional rezoning request, the possibility exists for point-source groundwater pollution impacts on surrounding residential areas. 6. Noise: Site design should include measures to mitigate any impacts associated with noise during both the construction and operation phases of any future use of this site. For example, site design should include an earth berm and increased plantings (trees and shrubs) to mitigate the effect of noise and light on adjacent residences. Staff suggests that the property owner proffer conditions ensuring that sound levels do not exceed 60 dbA when measured at adjoining residences. ?J. PROFFERED CONDITIONS 1. The following uses shall be excluded from any development at this site: automobile painting, upholstering, repairing, rebuilding, reconditioning, body and fender work, truck repairing or overhauling; seed and feed. stores; veterinary hospital and commercial kennels with exterior runs and yards; commercial laundry and dry cleaning plants; flea markets inside a structure only provided a special exception has been granted by the Board of Supervisors. /.2~~~/~ Mr. Gubala presented to and discussed with, the Planning Commission potential proffers and indicated a willingness to approach the property owner to request the proffers suggested by the Planning Commission. The following are proffers suggested by the Planning Corcunission: 1. Ensure Type E screening and buffering along those boundaries which abut residential uses. 2. Sound levels not to exceed 60 dbA when measured at adjoining residences. 3. Dust mitigation measures will be employed during construction and operation phases. 4. Signage on each industrial lot not to excel 1.5 sq.ft. per one foot of linear road frontage or 300 sq.ft. per site. 5. No outside, nighttime operations will be allowed. E. OONA'IISSIONER'S MOTION, VOTE AND REASON Mr. Massey moved to approve the petition with proffered conditions. The motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Massey, Gordon, Robinson, Witt NAYS: None ABSENT: Winstead F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE None. G. ATrACF~4El~TrS Concept Plan (8~" x 11") Vicinity Map (8~" x 11") Staff Report Other Terrance Harrington, Se etary Roanoke County Plan ing Commission /.~. _lc~ STAFF REPORT E NUMBERS 47-12/89 PETITIONERS Board of Supervisors JIEWED BYE Dale Castellow~ DATES December 5, 1989 Petition of the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors to rezone two tracts totaling approximately 19 acres, from A-1, Agriculture to M-1, Light Industry for industrial development. One tract is located south of the terminus of Friendship Lane. The second tract is adjacent to the northeast boundary of ITT and approximately 75 feet northeast of the terminus of Lila Drive. Both are located in the Hollins Magisterial District. 1. NATURE OF REQUEST a. Unconditional request to rezone approximately 19 acres from A- 1, Agriculture to M-1, Light Industry to accommodate future industrial growth in Roanoke County. 2. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS a. The H-1, Light Industry District permits a variety of industrial land uses including assembly of appliances and electronic devices, manufacturing of products from ceramics, plastics and other similar materials, as well as warehousing and veterinary hospitals. Provided a special exception permit is granted, general commercial uses, including day care centers, directly supportive of area industrial facilities, are permitted as well. At this time the land owner has not proffered any conditions which restrict future use of either site. b. In the event a development proposal is submitted for either site, site plan review would be required to ensure compliance with County regulations. 3. SITE CHARACTERISTICS a. Topographye Site (A), located at the terminus of Friendship Lane, is predominantly flat. Site (B), located south of the terminus of Lila Drive, is gently rolling with a slight slope to the south toward Williamson Road. b. Ground Cover: Both sites are vacant and appear to be actively used for agricultural purposes. 4. AREA CHARACTERISTICS a. Future Growth Priority Both sites are situated within the Peters Creek Community Planning Area, this has been designated as a high growth area. b. General area is developed with scattered single family residences, light industrial uses, offices and several commercial establishments. A community park is located in this area. ~~~ ~~ 5. LAND USE IMPACT ASSESSMENT Ratings Rate each factor according to the impact of the proposed action. Use a scale of 1 through 5. 1 • positive impact, 2 negligible impact, 3 - manageable impact, 4 - disruptive impact, 5 - severe impact, and N/A not applicable. RATING FACTOR COMMENTS LAND USE COMPATIBILITY 2 a. Comprehensive Plans 1985 Comprehensive Development Plan has placed this area within a Principal Industrial land use category. The proposed rezoning from A-1, Agriculture to M-1, Light Industry is consistent with the land use types, principals, and guidelines specified in the Principal Industrial category. Land uses encouraged within the Principal Industrial category include, Agricultural Industries; Conventional Industries; Industrial Parks; Hining and Extraction; and Planned Employment Centers. Those land uses permitted in the M-1, Light Industry zoning district, with the exception of those uses related to automobile repair, veterinary hospitals and commercial kennels, are consistent with the land use categories described above. In addition, the proposed rezoning is consistent with the Land Use Guidelines specified in the Principal Industrial category. Policy I-9 does suggest prohibiting industrial development adjacent to residential uses unless exceptional design measures are applied to achieve compatibility. As both sites abut residential uses, either directly or across an existing right- of-way, such measures will be necessary to ensure compatibility. ~ b. Surrounding Land: Site (A) is adjacent to Carvins Creek and is bordered by office, agricultural and institutional land uses. This site maintains street frontage along Friendship Lane. Site (B) is located at the terminus of Lila Lane and is bordered by light industrial, agricultural, and residential land uses. 3 c. Neighboring Area: Light industry, residential, office, institutional and assorted commercial uses. ~ d. Site Layouts Unknown due to lack of a concept plan. e. Architectures 3 f. Screening and Landscaping: Although no specific development proposal has been submitted at this time, future development of both sites as light industry will require stringent screening and buffering. As previously discussed, Policy I-9 suggests that exceptional design measures are necessary to mitigate land use impacts when residential and industrial uses are located adjacent to each other. (As previously aentioned, both sites abut residential land uses.) One aspect of exceptional design is sufficient screening and buffering. Adequate screening and buffering can help to mitigate impacts associated with noise and visibility resulting from industrial land uses. Specifically, staff is recommending the property owner proffer "Type E" screening and buffering along the property boundaries of both sites where they abut residential uses. Type E would provide residents with either a 35 foot buffer yard and an eight foot screen, or a 50 foot buffer yard with assorted deciduous trees, evergreen trees and small shrubs. 5 g. Amenities Unknown due to lack of a concept plan. h. Natural Amenities: TRAFFIC 3 i. Street Capacities Traffic counts conducted in 1986 revealed a volume of 8,600 vehicles per day along Plantation Road. Because of recent development activity along this segment of Plantation Road, staff estimates existing traffic volumes are significantly higher. Based on ITE trip generation rates for light industrial land uses, the proposed sites would generate approximately 985 vehicle trips per day. This estimate is based on average weekday vehicle trip ends per acre of light industrial land uses. The county's Six-Year Road Improvement Program currently includes plans for upgrading Plantation Road. The plan calla for widening Plantation Road to four lanes undivided with a center turn lane, extending from I-81 to the recently completed improvements at Plantation and Williamson Roads. VDOT advises construction of this project should begin in the Fall of 1991. ~ j. Circulations Direct access to these sites can be gained from either Friendship Lane (Site A) or Lila Drive (Site B). Both streets currently serve both commercial/industrial and residential land uses. VDOT advises additional demand along Friendship Lane will require upgrading the facility. VDOT further states there are not sufficient funds in the current Six-Year Plan to fund even existing proposals. An alternative method of financing will be needed to cover additional projects such as this. Due to a lack of a concept plan, staff can not assess on-site circulation alternatives. UTILITIES 3 k. Water: As previously discussed for similar sites in this area, the staff of the Roanoke County Department of Public Utilities advises that future use of these sites as light industry would necessitate the construction of a new County water system. The proposed rezoning sites are currently served by a connection to an existing Roanoke City water line. The city water line does not provide the minimum flow requirements necessary to support additional commercial or industrial land uses. ~-~ Consequently, the new water system would have to be completed prior to development of this site. Staff further advises that plans are being Wade to construct such a water system to serve these sites as well as the existing commercial and industrial uses located in this area. Future development of both sites is contingent upon completion of the proposed water syste0. ;~ 1. Sewers The staff of the Department of Utilities advisee that adequate sewer facilities are located in proximity to this site. DRAINAGE 3 n. Basing The county engineering staff advises that drainage problems have been noted in this area. Staff stated that runoff along Friendship Lane. has impacted those residences located along the north side of Friendship Lane. Site (A) is at least partially located in the Carvins Creek floodplain. n. Floodplain~ See "m" above. PUBLIC SERVICES 3 0. Fire Protection: Provided the existing water system is upgraded, the Fire and Rescue staff advises that their department would have no problem in providing fire and emergency services to this site. 3 p. Rescues See "o" above. q. Parks and Recreation: r. Schools: TAR BASE 1~1 a. - Land and Iaprovement Value: - Taxable Gross Sales/Year: - Total Employees, - Total Revenue to the County/Year: Unknown ENVIRONMENT 4 t. Air: Site design should include measures to mitigate dust during both the construction and operation phases of any future use of this site. Staff suggests the property owner proffer that dust mitigation measures will be employed during both phases described above. The dust mitigation measures should negate any impacts that dust may have on adjoining residences. 4 u. Water: Since this an unconditional rezoning request the possibility exists for point-source groundwater pollution impacts on surrounding residential areas. ~iL v. Soils: 4 W. 3 x. Noises Site design should include measures to mitigate any impacts associated with noise during both the construction and operation phases of any future use of this site. For example, site design should include an earth Bern and increased plantings (trees and shrubs) to mitigate the effect of noise and light on adjacent residences. Staff suggests that the property owner proffer conditions ensuring that sound levels do not exceed 60 dB(A) when measured at adjoining residences. signaqe, Although no-concept plan has. been submitted, staff recommends the property owner proffer that signaqe on each lot within the industrial area will not exceed 1.5 square feet per one foot of linear road frontage or 300 square feet per site. 6. PLAN CONSISTENCY This area is designated as Principal Industrial. Petitioner's request is consistent with the land use plan map and applicable policies. Those policies pertaining to site design will have to be evaluated after a specific development proposal has been Submitted. 7. STAFF EVALUATION a. Strengths: (1) The proposed rezoning is consistent with the land use policies and guidelines specified in the Principal Industrial land use category. (2) Both sites are conveniently located to provide quick access to I-81. b. Weaknesses: (1) The proposed rezoning is unconditional and offers no restrictions on future use of the site. Any use permitted in. the. M-1, Light Industry District, including veterinary hospitals and automobile repair and refurbishing facilities could be located on this site. c. Proffers Suggested, (i) Staff recommends the property owner proffer conditions restricting future use of this site. Specifically, staff recommends the property owner proffer conditions prohibiting the following uses from this site: (a) Automobile painting upholstering, repairing, rebuilding, reconditioning, body and fender work, truck repairing or overhauling; (b) Manufacturing or assembling of products from leather, material or straw; (c) Veterinary hospital and commercial kennels with exterior runs and yards; and (d) Flea markets, unless a special exception has been granted by the Board of Supervisors. (2) Staff recommends the property owner proffer "Type E" screening and buffering along those boundaries which abut residential uses. (3) Staff suggests that the property owner proffer conditions ensuring that sound levels do not exceed 60 dB(A) when measured at adjoining residences. (4) Staff suggests the property owner proffer that dust mitigation measures will be employed during both phases described above. (5) Staff suggests the property owner proffer that signaqe on each industrial lot not exceed 1.5 square feet per one foot of linear road frontage or 300 square feet per site. November 30, 1989 Roanoke County Board of Supervisors c/o Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator County of Roanoke P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 Gentlemen: SUBJECT: Tax Map Parcel 27.07-1-3 and 4 (part) I voluntarily proffer the following conditions to apply to the rezoning of two parcels of 11.349 acres and 6.626 acres that have been requested by Roanoke County Board of Supervisors to encourage economic development in Roanoke County. Permitted uses of the property shall not include: a. Automobile painting, upholstering, repairing, rebuilding, reconditioning, body and fender work, truck repairing or overhauling; b. Seed and feed stores; c. Veterinary hospital and commercial kennels with exterior runs and yards; d. Commercial laundry and dry cleaning plants; e. Flea markets - inside a structure onl special exception has been granted by the Boa rdd of Supervisors. I understand that the .rezoning was initiated by the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors and will not jeopardize my ability to apply and qualify for enrollment in Roanoke County's land use assessment program. w Raymo B. Huffman t/f Ha el H. Huffm n sbo z ~• i ~~~ ved By: ~~ • No.. No.: ROANOKE COUNTY REZONING APPLICATION ~T ~~ 1989 1. Owner's Name: *LAMNIN6. rW11TIG 6 GRANTS Mr. and Mrs. Raymond Huffn~ 366-7350 Phone: Address: 7820 Lila Drive, Roanoke, VA 20419 2. Applicant's Name: Roanoke County Board of Supervisors phone: 772-2005 Address: P•0. Box 29800, Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 3. Location of Property: One tract fronting on Friendship Lane; one tract ad'acent to the Northeast boundar o IT an a rox ma e e J Tax Map Number(s) : 27 07 -1-3 and a ~rom the enyd o Lila Drive portion of 4 4. Magisterial District: Hollins 5. Size of Property: Two tracts of approximately 19 acres; one tract 7 acres; one rac approx ate y acres. 6. Existing Zoning: Agricultural District A-1 Existing Land Use: Agricultural 7. Proposed Zoning: Industrial District M-1 Proposed Land Use: Industrial Development 8. Comprehensive Plan Designation: Principal Industrial 9. Are Conditions Proffered With This Request? Yes x No (If you are voluntarily offering proffers tion, these proffers must be in rritin as a part of your applica- A m b g. Staff can assist you in the preparation of em er of the Planning these proffers.) 10. Value of Land and (Proposed) Buildings: Not known il. The Following Items 1Kust Be Submitted With This Application. Please Check If Enclosed. Application Will Not Be Accepted If Any Of These Items Are Kissing Or Incomplete: x Letter of Application - Concept Plan Pe nd_ inQ Metes and Bounds Description -~ - List of Adjacent Owners of Property (Attach Exhibit A) x Vicinity Map -.~ Application Fee x gdritten Proffers - Water and Sewer Application ~_.~.~ _ (Tf Applicable) 12. Signature Of Property Owner, Contract Purchaser, ~_ Or Owner's Agen -- ~ r1 /~-' , Signature ~•~ ~ ~ 10/19/89 , Date P ANp~.~ ~ z ~ ~ ~ C~~~trt~ ~~ ~ ,~aar~~t~gr ~ ~~ DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT u~ 88 $FSDUICENTENN~P~ M E M O RAND U M A Btauti ful Begi~ing TO: Terry Harrington Director, Planning and Zoning ~~ FROM: Timothy Gubala "7~irector, Economic Development DATE: October 20, 1989 SIIBJECT: Rezoning application - Huffman tracts i.2_,~ On behalf of the Board of Supervisors I am submitting an application for the rezoning of approximately 19± acres (one tract of 10-12 acres; another 7) from Agricultural District A-1 to Industrial District M-1. This property is one of several evaluated as part of the 1989 study of potential industrial sites that was initiated by the Board of Supervisors. Please note that the Concept Plan and water and sewer application are not included because there is not a user for the property. Rezoning of the property must precede the detailed site planning. Area water improvements for a new storage facility and transmission line are planned by the Utility Director to address existing water pressure problems for sprinkler requirements within industrial buildings. Several proffered conditions for limiting M-1 permitted uses are as follows: Suggested proffers: 1. The property will not include permitted uses for: a. Automobile painting, upholstering, repairing, rebuilding, reconditioning, body and fender work, truck repairing or overhauling; b. Manufacturing of pottery and figurines or other similar ceramic products; c. Veterinary hospital and commercial kennels with exter~.or runs and yards; d. Flea markets, unless a special exception has been granted by the Board of Supervisors. e. Seed and feed stores. Please advise me with your comments and questions. Than yO~laX 29800 ROANOKE , VIRGINIA 24018-0798 (703> 772-2069 v FAX. NO.: <703) 772-2030 ~~ PIANf ` X16 • • MOIUNI • y + Qat~ • ~ ~. N ........ .. ..............»»....... . ia'~'~'3 f • ,• ,,,. • . ~ mss. '~ ~L) ~ .R`v • a~. ~•CK~.• ~Frif ..:; S . ~w •~~• r;;~ 1 ~...: ' ~~'r ~ i ' a ~ 1 f T /. PO ~ ~ ~~ •7:.1 s ~ ~ r ~w c ~ "" . . Zoninq: Al Comprehensive ~ Plan Designation: Principal Industrial Access: Lila Drive, Friendship Lane Water: Off site in Plantation Road Sewer: On site, Carvins Creek Availability: Family wishes to retain farm and homeplace and make three tracts at perimeter of property available. Property is in r l ea estate land use and subject to roll back taxes if developed. Recommendation: Roanoke County to improve area water service Frith new water storage tank and lines . Lila Drive and Friendship Lane to be included i V n DOT Six Year Plan for road improvements. Fiscal Impact: 1991 for water; 1995-96 for VDOT road improvements. Department of Economic Development Huffman Property 19± acres s,2 - yam, AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, DECEMBER 19, 1989 ORDINANCE TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF APPROXIMATELY 19 ACRES OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED IN THE HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF Al TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF M1 FOR INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT WITH CONDITIONS UPON THE APPLICATION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA WHEREAS, by Resolution 91289-4 the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, initiated amendments to the Comprehensive Plan and to the classifications of certain real estate located in Roanoke County to serve the public purposes of the County as required by public necessity, convenience, general welfare, and good zoning practice in order to implement the recommendations of the Economic Development Action Plan for FY 1989-90; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on November 28, 1989, and the second reading and public hearing was held on December 19, 1989; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on December 5, 1989; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing approximately 19 acres--a 6.6 acre tract located south of the terminus of Friendship Lane and an 11.3 acre tract adjacent to the northeast boundary of ITT and approximately 75 feet northeast from the end of Lila Drive, both tracts as described herein, owned by Raymond B. and Hazel H. Huffman and located in the Hollins Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of A1, Agricultural District, to the zoning class- ification of M1, Light Industrial District. 2. That the Board initiated the application to change the zoning classification of this real estate located in Roanoke County to serve the public purposes of the County as required by public necessity, convenience, general welfare, and good zoning practice to implement the recommendations of the Economic Development Action Plan for FY 1989-90. 3. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: Beginning at an iron pin on the south side of Lila Drive (Virginia Route 5018) 973.5' east of Plantation Road (Virginia Route 115); thence with the south side of Lila Drive N. 71° 43' 12" E. 51.07' to a point; thence leaving Lila Drive through the property of Raymond B. and Hazel H. Huffman the following courses: S. 30° 00' 34" E. 242.03' to a point; N. 62 46' 20" E. 326.72' to a point; N. 77° 32' 12" E. 130.14' to a point in the center of an existing 20' right-of-way; thence along the centerline of said 20' right-of-way the following courses: S. 33° 47' 29" E. 33.56' to a point; S. 47° 32' 39" E. 39.68' to a point; S. 25° 32' 39" E. 41.05' to a point; thence with the west line of John H. and Cynthia H. Huffman S. 25° 32' 39" E. 451.76' to a point; thence through the property of Raymond B. and Hazel H. Huffman S. 28° 19' 29" E. 467.66' to an iron pin; thence with said Huffman and the north line of Rajesh R. Desai the following courses: S. 79° 27' 31" W. 436.40' to an iron pin; S. 64° 07' 31" W. 51.16' to an iron pin; thence with said Huffman and the east line of Dairymen, Inc. and Interna- tional Telephone and Telegraph Corporation N. 30° 00' 34" W., a total distance of 1188.46' passing an iron pin at 489.77' to the point of beginning and containing 11.349 acres as shown on plat by Balzer & Associates Inc. for Raymond B. and Hazel H. Huffman, dated October 26, 1989. and Beginning at an iron pin on the south side of Friendship Lane (Virginia Secondary Route 1895) 1400'± east of Plantation Road (Virginia Route 115); thence with the south side of Friendship Lane N. 49° 34' 24" E. 242.55' /, to a point; thence leaving Friendship Lane and with the south line of Danny R. Myers N. 61° 02' 10" E. 98.84' to a point in the center of Carvin's Creek; thence with the centerline of Carvin's Creek the following courses: S. 38° 42' 10" E. 258.18' to a point; S. 25° 32' 43" E. 202.90' to a point; S. 01° 28' 04" E. 30.29' to a point; S. 32° 09' 10" E. 324.71' to a point; thence leaving Carvin's Creek a line through the property of Raymond B. and Hazel H. Huffman S. 61° 00' 55" W. 371.93' to an iron pin; thence with said Huffman and the east line of AMP, Incorporated N. 28° 59' 05" W. 760.00' to the point of beginning and containing 6.626 acres as shown on plat by Balzer & Associates, Inc. for Raymond B. and Hazel H. Huffman, dated October 25, 1989. 4. That Raymond B. Huffman and Hazel H. Huffman, as owners of this real estate, have voluntarily proffered in writing the follow- ing conditions which the Board of Supervisors hereby accepts: (1) The property will not include permitted uses for: (a) Automobile painting, upholstering, repairing, rebuilding, reconditioning, body and fender work, truck repairing or overhauling; (b) Seed and feed stores; (c) Veterinary hospital and commercial kennels with exterior runs and yards; and (d) Commercial laundry and dry cleaning plants; (e) Flea markets - inside a structure only - provided a special exception has been granted by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. (2) Ensure Type E screening and buffering along those boundaries which abut residential uses. (3) Sound levels shall not exceed 60 dba when measured at adjoining residences. (4) Signage on each industrial lot not to exceed 1.5 square feet per one foot of linear road frontage or 300 square feet per site. (5) No outside, nighttime uses after 11 p.m. will be ~ //~ allowed in the M1 District. 5. That the effective date of this ordinance shall be December 19, 1989. December 11, 1989 Roanoke County Board of Supervisors c/o Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator County of Roanoke P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 Gentlemen: SUBJECT: Tax Map Parcel 27.07-1-3 and 4 (part) I voluntarily proffer the following conditions to apply to the rezoning of two parcels of 11.349 acres and 6.626 acres that have been requested by Roanoke County Board of Supervisors to encourage economic development in Roanoke County. 1. Permitted uses of the property shall not include: a. Automobile painting, upholstering, repairing, rebuilding, reconditioning, body and fender work, truck repairing or overhauling; b. Seed and feed stores; c. Veterinary hospital and commercial kennels with exterior runs and yards; d. Commercial laundry and dry cleaning plants; e. Flea markets - inside a structure only - provided a special exception has been granted by the Board of Supervisors. 2. Ensure Type E screening and buffering along those boundaries which abut residential uses. 3. Sound levels not to exceed 60 dbA when measured at adjoining residences. 4. Signage on each industrial lot not to exceed 1.5 square feet per one foot of linear road frontage or 300 square feet per site. 5. No outside, nighttime uses after 11 p.m. will be allowed in the M-1 district. Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Page 2 December 11, 1989 I understand that the rezoning was initiated by the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors and will not jeopardize my ability to apply and qualify for enrollment in Roanoke County's land use assessment program. Raymo d B. Huffman .~ Ha 1 H. Huffm sbo OVER AS TO FORM ~-- That notwithstanding proposed legislation which may be adopted by the 1990 session of the Virginia General Assembly pursuant to the recommendations of the Commission on Local Government Structures and Relationships, any further negotiations between Roanoke County and the Town of Vinton concerning a boundary line relocation or change by agreement between the localities shall not be precluded or otherwise limited. F P~1~E` z~ ~,) a 18 ~~ 88 'EFSQUICENTE~IN~P~ A Bcautifu/Beginning COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE December 21, 1989 Mr. W. Darnall Vinyard P. O. Box 295 Vinton, Virginia 24179 Dear Mr. Vinyard: LEE GARRE~ WINDSOR HILLS MAGIS RICHARD W. ROBERS. VI( CAVE SPRING MAGIS BOE HOLLINS MAGIS STEVEf CATAW BA MAGIS HARR VIN TON MAGIf The Board of Supervisors have asked me to express on their behz their sincere appreciation for your previous service to i Industrial Development Authority. Citizens so responsive to i needs of their community and willing to give of themselves < their time are indeed all too scarce. This is to advise that at their meeting held on Tuesday, Decem] 19, 1989, the Board of Supervisors voted unanimously to reappo you as a member of the Industrial Development Authority for a fo~ year term. Your term will expire on September 26, 1993. State law provides that any person elected, re-elected, appoin to any body be furnished a copy of the Freedom of Information A your 1989 copy is enclosed. We are also sending you a copy of 1989 Conflict of Interest Act. It is necessary that you take an oath of office before the C1 of the Roanoke County Circuit Court. This oath must administered Qrior to your participation on this Committee. Ple telephone Mrs. Elizabeth Stokes, Clerk, at 387-6208, as soon possible and arrange to have the oath administered. On behalf of the Supervisors and the citizens of Roanoke Cour please accept our sincere thanks and appreciation for ~ willingness to accept this appointment. Sincerely, Brenda J. Ho ton, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors bjh Enclosures cc: Mrs. Elizabeth Stokes, Clerk of Circuit Court Timothy Gubala, Secretary, IDA (~D1tYtt1~ D~ ~i~MriU~2P BOARD OF SUP P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 2 4018-07 9 8 (703) 772-2004 F ~~l~F z~ OJ a2 18 E~ 88 SFSQUICENTENN~P~ A Beautiful Beginning C~n~Yn~~ of ~vttnnke BOARD OF SUf COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR December 20, 1989 ELMER C. HODGE Mr. Jack W. Mullins 5160 Hollyhock Road, N.W. Roanoke, Virginia 24012 LEE GARRE WIN DSOR HILLS MAGI: RICHARD W. ROBERS. V CAVE SPRING MAGI' BO HOLLINS MAGI STEVE CATAWBA MAGI HARF VIN TON MAGI Dear Mr. Mullins: At their regular meeting on Tuesday, December 19, 1989, the Roan County Board of Supervisors unanimously approved the request of Loyal Order of Moose December 214 1989a raffle permit. The raf will be conducted on The fee has been paid and your receipt is enclosed. You may consider this letter to be your permit, and I suggest be displayed on the premises where the raffle ermits be issues The State Code provides that raffle Mni t ingssued will expire a calendar-year basis and such p December 31, 1989. This permit, however, is only valid on the c specified in your application. If I may be of further assistance, please do not hesitate contact me at 772-2004. Sincerely, ~L~-~-' Brenda J. olton, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisor bjh Enclosures cc: Commissioner of the Revenue Commonwealth Attorney County Treasurer P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24018-0798 (703) 772-2004 ,~ ,;- . _.. ~. _, NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARINGS CITY OF ROANOKE AND COUNTY OF ROANOKE IN RE: GOVERNMENTAL CHARTER FOR THE ROANOKE METROPOLITAN GOVERNMENT Pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 17 of Title 15.1 of the 1950 Code Virginia, as amended, and specifically Section 15.1-835, the Board of Supervisors of tl County of Roanoke and the City Council of the City of Roanoke hereby give notice public hearings to be held as follows: City of Roanoke, December 18, 1989, 7:30 p.m. Roanoke Civic Center Exhibit Hall 710 Williamson Road, NE Roanoke, Virginia County of Roanoke, December 19. 1989, 7:00 p.m. Roanoke County Administration Center 3738 Brambleton Avenue Roanoke, Virginia so that the citizens of the City of Roanoke and the County of Roanoke shall have opportunity to comment upon the City of Roanoke and the County of RoanokE request that the 1990 General Assembly grant the Roanoke Metropolitan GovernmE a charter. An informative summary of this governmental charter is as follows: CHARTER OF THE ROANOKE METROPOLITAN GOVERNMENT Incorporation; Powers; Governing Body; Metropolitan Manager; Constitutional Officers; Personnel Rules and Regulations; Administration; Department of Law; Department of Finance; Other Appointed Officers; Planning and Zoning; Department of Public Health; Department of Social artment of Education: Finana~ Administration; Budget; Services; Dep Power of Eminent Domain; Borrowing; Irrtergovemmental Relattonsh~Ps~ Ordinances; and Miscellaneous of the roposed new charter is on file in the ~cu erv sors'of Roanoke A copy P the City of Roanoke and the Office of the Clerk to the Board of S p County. ~, •~. Paul M. Mahoney, County Attor ey County of Roano b'~i\ Cu Mary Parker, Clerk City of Roanoke Publish on the following date in the morning and evening edition: December 8, 1989 Send invoice to: Ms. Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 Legal Notices ~ it egal Notices 10 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARINGS CITY OF ROANOKE AND COUNTY OF ROANOKE IN RE: GOVERNMENTAL CHARTER FOR THE ROANOKE METROPOLITAN GOVERNMENT Pursuant to the Drovlslons of Chapter 17 of Title 15.1 of the 1950 Cods of Vlrplnla, as amended, and sDeclflcsllY Section 15.1:55, the Board of Suparvlson of the County of Roanoke and the City Connell of the City of Rwnoke hereby give notlu of Dubllc hesrtnps to be held as follows: City of Roanoke, December 18, 1989, 7:30 p.m. Roanoke Clvlc Center Exhibit Hall 710 Williamson Road, NE Rosnoke, Vlrplnla County of Roanoke, December 19, 1989, 7:00 D.m. Roanoke County Adminlstratlon Canter 3738 Brembleton Avenue Rosnoke, Vlrplnla so that the citltens of the City of Roanoke and the County of Rosnoke sMll Mve an oDPOr- tunlty to comment upon the City of Roanoke and fhs Coun- t' of Rwnoke's request thst the 1990 General Assembly tan GovernmeMka hatrteroll• An Informative summary of this povsrnmental charter Is es follows: CHARTER OF THE ROANOKE METROPOLITAN GOVERNMENT IncorDOratlon; Powers; Gov- arnlnp Body; MstroDOlltan Manager; Constitutional ONI- cera; Personnel Rules and ReOUlatlons; Adminlstratlon; Department of LOW; pepart• ment of Finance; Other AD• pointed Officers; Plonnin0 end 2onln0: Department o1 Public Health; Department o1 Soelal Services; DepsrtmsM of Eduutlon; Flnanelel Ad minlstrstlon; Budget; Borrow Inp; Intergovernmental Rela tlonshlDS; Power of Eminen Domeln; Ordlnanees; •nl Mlsdllaneous A copy of the DroDOSed net eMrter Is on file In the OHIc of tM City Clerk for the City a Roanoke and 1M Office of th Clerk to fM Board of Superv son of Rwnoke County. Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney County of Rwnoke Mary Parker, Clerk City of Rwnoke (11121) ORDER OF PUBLICATION ' COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA IN THE CLERK'S OFFICE ( - THE CIRCUIT COURT FC THE CITY OF ROANOKE PATRICIA MILLS t v LARRY MILLS - Ths obled of this suit Is fo: r ~ taln a divorce a vlnculo mat menll upon one Year MW eats Notues 10 legal Ilon of Dartles. Is ORDERED that Larry Mills ul sDPesr at the above named fr court and protect his Interests Co on or before Janusry 1t, 1990. la, November 27, 1989 N PatsYTeaterman,Clerk In Lena Testerrttan Dr Deputy Clerk of (25550) m ROANOKE COUNTY a L SCHOOLS Wllllsm Byrd HIOh Sehwls In• L vises bids for yearbook pho- 3' fl to0raphy. For addltlonal In- t formstlon contact Mr. Robert p A. Patterson, PrInclDSl, WII- T Ilam Byrd Hlph School, 2902 ~ WsshlnOton Avenue, Vinton, a tl VA 24179 (703) !90.3090• Blds will be accepted In the shove ottlcs until 2 p.m., January 12, c 1990. ' (11453) SUBSTITUTE TRUSTEES' SALE Th 616 Stewart Avenue, S. E. 1 City of Rosnoke In execution of a deed of trust from Crockett L. Smith and Brands D. Smith, hiswlfe, dat- ed October 4, 1982, recorded In the Clerk's Offlee, Clrcult Court, City o} Roanoke, Vlr- plnla, Deed Book 1480, Pepa 1591, the undsrsl0nad Trustsa will offer for sale at Dubllc ve- e at Dubllc auction ar me ont door of the Rosnoke City urthouse, Rwnoke, Vir01n- T on Janusry S, 1990, at 12:00 G oon, the property described sold Deed o} Trust, which operty Is located In the City Rwnoke, Vlrplnla, and Is ore Dartlculerly described s follows: of 8, Block 2, MaD of Bretton awn, recorded In Plat Book Psoe 152, In the Clerk's OI- ce of the Circuit Court for M County of Roanoke, Vlr- - Inls; and o0ether with all right, title nd Interest In and to thst Dora on of Ksren Street, as more paHiculsrly set forth In that er}sin order of record In the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court for the County of Roanoke, Vlrplnla, In Deed Book 1029, at Pape 297. Is property Is being sold sub• act to a prior Deed of Trust, the terfits and condltlons of which will bs announced sithe ssla. In addition, this sale Is being conducted suDlect to the rlOht of redemption by the United States of America to satisfy a federsl sex Ilan filed against the proDertY, the terms end condltlons of which will also be announced at the seta auetlon, land, with Impro s 616 Stewart TERMS OF SALE: Cash menu, known a Avenw, S.E, end described as SETTLEMENT TO BE MADE WITHIN 10 DAYS OF DATE Lot 10, Sscfion 1, Belmont Land Co., lacsted et the north- OF SALE. POSIT OF (100.00 BI andtFllckwlr St. (7th St.), Clty REQUIRED. of Roanoke, Vlrplnla. Mlchsel J. Aheron SubstltuteTrustee Sale to be held at the front door FOR MORE INFORMATION of The building whleh houses iha Clrcult Court of iha City of CONTACT: Roanoke, 315 W. Church Mlchsel J. Aheron, Esq. O OSTERH E Sirset, Roanoke, Vlrplnla, on December 15, 1989, et 1:00 p.m. A L AGEE, HERON NATT, TERMS: Cash-Settlement In full within 7 days of eels dsta. P.C. 1919 Electric Road, SW Cash deDOSlt of f1,000 may be ~ 24018 , ) ~e a 7o required. 4- 1 i C Robert E Kana, Jr. (15113) Thomss A. Cooper Substltuta Trustees "Either of whom msY sd" FOR INFORMATION CONTACT: The above Trustees or Jayne M. Rechenbach 7110 Forest Avenue Suite 202 Richmond, VA 23226 804/282.3114 I (3862) 1 SUBSTITUTE TRUSTEE'S ( SALE t Sale of the Reel Estate known ss Lot 8, Block 2 MoD of Bretton Lawn, also known as 3157 Richard Avenue, NE, Rwnoke, Vlrplnla 21012 In execution of a Deed of Trust from Jeffrey K. Obenchaln and Kathy N. ObencMin, (for- merly Kathy S. NleelY), hus• band and wife, dated June 2b 1985, of record In tM Clerk's pfflee of tM CItY of Rwnoke, F Vlrplnla, In Deed Book 1520, at R papa 1977, the underslDned Substltuts Trustee, hsvlnp been aDDOlnted Substltuta Trustee by Notice of Reslpns- tlon and Substltutlon of Trust- ~ ee, of record In the sfonwld rl- Clark's Office In Deed Bwk .a- ! 1613, Pape 847, will offer for TRUSTEE SALE 2737 Byron Dr., N.W. Roanoke County In execution of a Deed of Trus from David M. Davis i Lani G. Davis dated September 20 7985, recorded In the Clerk` Ottlce of the Clrcult Court o the County of Roanoke, Vlr olnla, in Dsed Book 1226, a ps0a 1185, defsult hsvinp a tarred In tM DaYment of th Note thereby secured and e tM regwst of the holder r Bald Note, the underslpne Substitute Trustee will o}fe for ssle at Dubllc auction + the entrance to the Clrcu Court Building of tM Coun~ of Rwnoke, Vlrplnla, on D camber 15, 1989 et 1:30 o'clo+ P. M.tha property descrlDl In sold deed, located et tl •bow addross and brleHy d scribed as: The South 58 feet o} Lot 2, s+ tM North 3 feet o} Lot 3, Bla 23 Dlat of Section 4, Montcl4 Estates, with ImDrovemer therwn. TERMS OF SALE: CASH. deDOSit of f1,000.00, cash certHlad check, will be qulred at the time of sale w settlement within fifteen (, Roanoke Times & World-News, Friday, Dec. 8,19E legal Notices 10 Child Care 13 1935, and recorded In the t Clerk's Offlte In Deed Book Pi, Dape 106. _ :RMS: CASH. IVEN under my hand this 11th day of November, 1919• Hampton W. Thomas Sole Acting Trustee Hampton W. Thomas, Trustee ~ 103 W. Campbell Avenue Roanoke, Vlrplnla 24011 (703) 315.0931 (1103) I TRUSTEE'S SALE + 2625 Wood Warbler Lena, S. W. Roanoke, Vlrplnla 24018 Roanoke Co. Tax Map it87.17-3-10 n execution of a deed of trust dated June 30, 1983 from Da- vid C. Ermsy and Grace Er- mey, husband and wife, to W. Courtney Klnp, Jr., et al, trustees, either of whom may act, recorded In the Clerk's Office of the Clrcult Court for Roanoke County, Vlrplnla In Deed Book 1194, DaOe 4S4 (which deed of trust has been assumed by others), the un- derslpned W. Courtney KInO, Jr., Sole Adinp Trustee will offer for sale st Dubllc auction et the front door of the Roanoke County Courthouse, 305 E. Msln Street, Salem, Vir- plnla on the 18th day of De- cember, 1989 at 12:00 Noon the property described In said deed of trust lying and being In Rosnoke County, Vlrplnla, and more Dartlculerly de- scrlbed ss follows: Lot 22, Block "FF", sccordinp to Plat of Section No. 9, Penn Forest, which plat Is recorded In Plst Book 8, Dape 41, In the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court o} Roanoke County, Vlr- plnla; and Conveyance shall be made with Special Warranty of Title end sale shall be sublets to apDll• cable condltlons, restrlctlons, rights-of-way, raservatlons, etc. attectinp the said reel es~ tare. TERMS: CASH A deDOSlt of ten percent (70%) o the DUYChaee Price may be re qulred et the time of sale li cash or certified funds sni settlement In full shell b~ f msde within 10 days thenal ter. ~ W. Courtney Kinp, Jr. Sole ANlnp Trusses ~ 112 W. kirk Ave. t Roanoka,VA21011 703.982.7711 f (~) r t ' Announcements Y k d Child tare k ABC/BASICS/TOTAL CARE Ir Intents thru rourM Andes; Eer is ly Childhood i Elementar Schools; cell anytime, SON SHINE, 562-3456, Peters CrN A at Cow Roads. or ~~ th ALL CHILDREN are speclsl c precious. Wa care for chlldi IS) spas ?-12 and otter a spa gild taro Retertal Service GII Linda, 9891801 Serving this area Sind 11415 CHILDCARE CENTERS 16 months-12 Yearb BrNburn, Vinton; 2 rears-M gars, n0s~~ DI« Gllrov~~wn- DO CHILDCARE IN MY HOME- neer 119 L Brembleton, full er part time. Judy 772-7672. Iderty Care II 1HOMESANf800 Rf 400 nclude room, board, utllltles, 24 hr nursf •sslsted ambulatory/nonymbu Inpto^uNOrfolk, ICllfton11FOree TeDDehannxkv~ lei II~~. JEST SW LOCATION, LPN carln ponry cidfull tInNY h9f9.OW3ten DOMINION HOME HEALTH 3@-CARE ELDERCARE Carlnp Ir+CaR' n1-9611 nd 1972. ELDERLY CARE-In our count home. Prl. rm. turn. Quiet, poi food. Open for InsD• 992-4719. LEWIS-GALE SuPPOrt Servlu~ For ell Your health cars needs. Csil 265.0626• Medical Personnel Pool 24 hours/7 days a week. 71be61 Nowell Health Care Pro}sulonsl RN's i LPN's. 772-9 U~joh~l He~althCatrenSeni~ loss, hound, Strayed FOUND: Australian Shepherd Floyd County, wsnts to cc home. Call 703.763.9225• FOUND: black i white female 1 plke~Owrter mus6desclrlbe fi 314-1Oq. FOUND: Cat, IerOe beoutlful sass about 10 days •po In 3 merdaen, Hollins area. i 366.7593. ~ FOUND-Man's ten locket. F+ I Towers Derkln0 lot one on II. Call 890.3833, bwe mess FOUND: Older male poben black i nd, some white on stn St., S.E. •rn, wesrln0 N no top. cell 342-9212; 344-1u LOST-Black i white mete Lost In Vinton/Brookled0e on 12/2/M. AnY Inro all 890 LOST: BROWN fEMAIE t 1 Algoma Perk/Mnn FOrgt 4 J 12/2.989-7882• LOST: GROWN LADY'S WAL Plentotlon Rtl. Area, Frl., REWARD. GII Tammy, 36! (~ OW or nlpM. LOST: Gt, DnY i white, be' VA HosD. i Lynchburg Turi Reward. GII Selerrt Anima ter or 366.8310. LOST female Siberian Htrskt eyes, In NOAtteest city. R ~ GII 362J221. LOST: KITTEN-SOLID Gi ADDx. 7 mo. old. yyltllsmu nd Area. Answers to "Smoke 'en REWARD.366.3616. lal _ Decerber^ 4, 1`~8"~ Mr". Lee Gar^r^ett clo F'. CJ. Hox ~'~~8~~ C,~oar~~~~ke, VA. E4Q~18 I)ear^ Mr. Gar^r^ett, Several member^s of ~w~ur leaq'--e have expr^eesed c~~ncern ~W~ver^ the r^ez~~r~ir~g ~~~f 54 acr^es ~~~wr~ed by Friendship Manor, located on Hr_,l 1 ina R~~~ad and Leis Lane; therefor"e, r eCeated b~_-sy sched~_-les at this time, it w~~~uld be ver^y aPP" if this item or, the agenda could be postp~~~ned fr^orn December 19 ~_-nt i 1 after the first cif the year". l"hank yo~_- f•=~r yo~_-r^ cooper^at i~~~n. Sincer^ely. Mr^s. Ga i 1 Li~~~wyer^ c /%~ Ho l 1 i ns Act i ~~~n Leap ~.-e lE~~ E-ea~.-m~.~nt Rd. , N. E. ' ~ to Rec.: a4 ~ ' ~ Received By: Jn,ut- Case No.: Ord. No.: ROANOKE COUNTY REZONING APPLICATION 1. Owner's Name: YIR~jIa-A FKsoc~u~:c-.~ of Amp~~.~;,i5w~mr-c~j.rMC Phone:7~]Q-•a7; Address:c~p 3704 m~~7oQOta~rti~ mono Sl,~ ~ , YA Z4o~8 2. Applicant's Name: ' _ ~{ ~„ )Jp(3~,5 ~xtc, p,q~t~ocC, Phone:?"] . ~7~ Address: ~~OQ- rn(.'~p~ln~C. ICU/-~~ ~' ~4o..~~t Y~ ~~~ 3. Location of Property:_~1ZR.21M1~~ QOpp ~ (Q + VA a 4018 Tax Map Number (s) : ~?. O / - c~ - 1 4. Magisterial District: CAVE ~PIZ,tNCi 5. Size of Property:_ ~fOLC ~ ~, ~O ~Lc~ 6. Existing Zoning: I'Irl.- ) Existing Land Use: VAePN7 Proposed Zoning: ~-2 NoN ror,T u Proposed Land Use:_~QUI»~c j~o~N,~~'Cym!'c.~~~,orJCeti.~'1G1,/5~~e~ Diu?)~ 8. Comprehensive Plan Designation: W~~ 9. Are Conditions Proffered With This Request? Yes y No (If you are voluntarily offering proffers as a part of your app13 t~on~ these proffers must be 3n nr3ting. 1! member of the Plann3nc Staff can assist you 3n the preparation of these proffers.) ' 10. Value of Land and (Proposed) Buildings: 5000, OOd. 11. The Following Items Must Be Submitted With This Application. Please Check If Enclosed. Application Will Not Be Accepted If Any Of These Itess Are Missing Or Incomplete:. Letter of Application Concept Plan Metes and Bounds Description List of Adjacent Owner of Property (Attach Exhibit A) Vicinity Map Application Fee __ Written Proffers Water and Sewer Application's (If Applicable) ". Signature~~ ProX Or Owner' gent: Signature Contract Purchaser, ~~ ~~~l1LP/(,~ Date ~~ 0?7 ~IRGIl~TIA ASSOCIATION OF AMATEUR SWIMMERS, P. O. BOX 13284 • ROANOKE, V1RGiN1A 21033-321 - 703.774.2752 - November 27, 1989 Mr. Terrance L. Harrington,A.I.C.P. Director County of Roanoke Department of Planning 1- /~y~ Ii( •~~y~~y~~ ~1A[ iI~IYRlf and Zoning PO Box 29800 Roanoke, Virginia 24018 Dear Mr. Harrington: Attached please find our application of property onMerriman Road located Starkey Road. to re-zone a vacant parcel near the intersection of The current zoning on this property is M-1 which will not allow for the construction of our facility, therefore, we will apply to have this zoning changed to B-2 to allow for the constructio of the VIRGINIA AQUATIC CENTER, a non-profit aquatic training and competition center with support facilities. We feel that this center will improve the general area and will lead to an increase in income for not only the County of Roanoke but also theCommonwealth of Virginia. Please study the proffered conditions offered with this re-zoni application. If you have any changes to this application pleas contact me as soon as possible. Truly Yours, INIA I~SOCIATION OF AMATEUR SWIMMERS, INC. 1. nabel~ director NON PROFIT CORPORATION DEDICATED TO DEVELOPMENT OF AMATEUEt COMPETITIVE SWIMMING ENDORSED SY THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA OFFICIAL SPORTS PROGRAM VIR(:iNiA AMATF.IIR SP(1RTC. iN(:. / ViR[~NIA CTATF, f.AMFC VIRGINIt~ ASSOCIt~TION OF t1Mt~TEUR Si~VIMMERS, P. O. BOX 13284 • ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24033.3284 ' - 703-774-2752 - APPLICATION TO RE ZONE PROPERTY CURRENT PROPERTY ZONE: LM REQUESTED PROPERTY ZONE: B2 REQUESTED USES FOR PROPERTY: A. AQUATIC TRAINING AND COMPETITION CENTER (SWIMMING AND DIVING TRAINING AND COMPETITION) WITH FIXED SEATING FOR 3,000 B. 150 SEAT FULL SERVICE REST. AND LOUNGE WITH ABC LIC. C. RETAIL RENTAL SPACE (MIXED RETAIL USES,LEASED UNITS) { II D. SPORTS MEDICAL FACILITY (LEASED UNIT) E. ON_SITE TEMPORARY HOUSING FOR OUT OF TOWN/STATE STUDENTS IN TRAINING. F. ON SITE PERMANET HOUSING FOR CARETAKER G. CONCESSION FACILITIES FOR CENTER (LEASED UNIT) H. CENTEROWNED/OPERATED PRO SHOP (AQUATIC SUPPLIES AND EQUIPMENT) NON PROFIT CORPORATION DEDICATED TO DEVELOPMENT OF AMATEUR COMPETITIVE SWIMMING ENDORSED BY THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA OFFICIAL SPORTS PROGRAM •nnro~n • . \I •Tl•.In e•nnnTC fwr~ i v.nnr~n a CT.Tl• n. ucn ~, _ VIRGINIA ASSOCIATION OE AMAT.~UR Si]VIMMERS, ~ P. O. BOX 13284 • ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24033-3284 '~~.. - 703-774-2752 - II ~~ P~tCVaSeiO SI'CE Wn ~d ~~ O~ h.. u b h b u N zp ~p ~~ N ~'N a~ ~ H~ 0 i~ Tlwc~l.~wooo N/u.t. A1[ EA PROFIT CORPORATION DEDII ENDORSED BY THE COb VIRGINIA AM W 0 P o- d d ~r E ti ar y .. ~~ N04~7M IMM PE*+N roa.~t ycHe.1. 414 L~Lrct~c TO DEVELOPMIiNT OF AMATEUR COMPETITIVE SWIMMING VEALTH OF VIRGINIA OFFICIAL SPORTS PROGRAM SPORTS, INC. /VIRGINIA SUTE CAMES ~ s~k ~~ ~~ (.YIMMUNITY SBRVICBS AND DBVBLOPMBNT NOR~'$ ~,.. -~.~ ~. ~ 1 ~'; ~~~ ~ VIRGINIA ASSOCIATION OF AMATEUR SWIIYII~ERS INC. M.1 Tn n .. A-112889-3 ~ BLJ/SAM TO APPROVE ALTERNATE #1 '' URC 4. Write-off of Utility bad debts for 1983 and 19 A-112889-4 RR/HCN TO APPROVE URC 5. 1990 Legislative Program - General Assembly LG/RR TO CONTINUE TO 12/19/89 TO ALLOW COUNTY ATTORNEY TO MAIi REVISIONS REQUESTED BY BOARD MEMBERS URC 6. Amendment to the County Holiday Schedule A-112889-5 LG/SAM TO AMEND HOLIDAY SCHEDULE TO ADD DECEMBER 26, 1989 URC E. REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS NONE F. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS BLJ REQUESTED PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED CHARTER FOR ROANOKE METROPOLITAN GOVERNMENT G. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING FOR REZONING ORDINANCE - CONSENT AGENDA LG/BLJ TO APPROVE FIRST READING 2ND READING AND PUBLIC HEARINGS-12/19/89 URC 1. An ordinance to rezone approximately 3.13 acre; from R-1 to R-E with conditions, located at 60~ _r Cove Road, in the Catawba Magisterial Districi upon the request of James and Charlotte Moore. 2. An ordinance to rezone approximately 4.47 acrE from R-3 to B-1 to construct an office park, located at the southwest corner of Cresthill L and Garst Mill Road, in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District, upon the request of Nola Jackson. 3. An ordinance to amend the Future Land Use Map designation of a 24.09 acre tract generally located south of Buck Mountain Road and east o the Blue Ridge Parkway, in the Cave Spring Magisterial District, from Rural Village to Principal Industrial, and to rezone said prope from M-2 to M-3, with conditions upon the requ~ of the Virginia Asphalt Paving Company 4. An ordinance to rezone approximately 19 acres from A-1 to M-1 said acreage comprised of a 6.i acre tract located south of the terminus of Friendship Lane, and an 11.3 acre tract adjace~ to the northeast boundary of ITT and approximai 75 feet northeast from the end of Lila Drive located in the Hollins Magisterial District, u~ the request of the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors _~ I. NONE N- ~--N = ~ oar r~ ~. L ~ ~ n Y~^op APPOINTMENTS 1• Community Corrections Resources Board 2• Health Department Board of Directors 3. 't 4• Library Board / a - / q 5. Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission 6. Regional Partnership Site Advisory Committee 7- Roanoke County Resource uthority 8- Court Service IInit Advisory Coun 1/Yout and` Family Services Advisory Board J. CONSENT AGENDA ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CON_ SENT AGENDA CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WII ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS L: BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WIL REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDEF SEPARATELY. R-112889-6 BLJ/LG TO APPROVE - URC 1. A-112889-6.a 2. A-112889-6.b 3. Confirmation of Committee Appointment - Mental Health Services of the Roanoke Valley Acceptance of water and sanitary sewer faciliti serving Merriman Hills. Acceptance of water facilities serving Castle R< Homes. A-112889-6.C EVENING SESSION (7.00 P M ) FIRST READING OF ORDINANCE ~,'- 1. Ordinance Rescinding Ordinance dated October 24, 1 for sale of ten acres in Glenvar (Shamrock Field) SAM/HCN TO APPROVE FIRST READING WITH ITEM 6 OF ORDINANCE RE] FOR SEPARATE VOTE. AYES-BIJ,RR,HCN,LG ABSTAIN-SAM SAM/HCN TO APPROVE ITEM 6 OF ORDINANCE URC 2ND READING - 12/19/89 O- PUBLIC HEARINGS AND SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1189-1 An ordinance to amend the Future Land Use Plan designation of approximately 54 acres located of Hollins Road and south of Lois Lane in the Hollins Magisterial District from Development Principal Industrial and to change the zoning classification from R-1 to M-1 for industrial development purposes with conditions upon the application of the Board of Supervisors of Roa: County, Virginia CONTINUED TO 12/19/89 1189-2 An ordinance to change the zoning classificatic of approximately 15 acres of real estate locatc at the end of Benois Road in the Cave Spring Magisterial District from R-1 to M-1 for industrial development with conditions upon the application of the Board of Supervisors of Roar County, Virginia. HCN/RR TO CONTINUE PUBLIC HEARING TO 12/19/89 TO ALLOW PMM TO REDRAFT ORDINANCE AND COUNTY STAFF TO MEET WITH RESIDENTS CONCERNING BUFFER URC 1189-3 An ordinance to change the zoning classificatio of approximately 35 acres of real estate genera located south of I-81 and west of Plantation Ro in the Hollins Magisterial District from R-1 to 1 for mixed-use development with conditions upo: the application of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. (THIS REQUEST WAS CONTINUED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION. THE BOA SIIPERVISORS WILL HOLD THE PUBLIC HEARING ON DECEMBER 19, 1989) CONTINUED TO 12/19/89 1189-4 An ordinance to change the zoning classificat. of approximately 8 acres of real estate locate the southeast corner of the intersection of S~ Route 643 and I-81 in the Catawba Magisterial District from B-2 to M-1 for industrial development with conditions upon the applicat: of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. 0-112889-8 LG/RR TO APPROVE REZONING ORD. AYES-BL7,RR,HCN,LG ABSTAIN-SAM 1189-5 An ordinance to amend the Future Land Use Plan designation of approximately 25 acres located of Carvins Cove Dam Road and immediately north I-81 in the Catawba Magisterial District from Development to Principal Industrial. 0-112889-9 BLJ/SAM TO APPROVE REZONING ORD URC 1189-6 An ordinance to change the zoning classificati~ of approximately 125 acres of real estate loca~ south of Routes 11 and 460, south and west of Barley Drive and the N&W railway in the Catawb< Magisterial District from A-iMH to M-1 for industrial development with conditions upon the application of the Board of Supervisors of Roai County, Virginia. CONTINUED TO 12/19/89 1189-7 Ordinance amending Chapter 8, "Erosion and Sediment Control", of the Roanoke County Code ~ amending Section 8-11 (a), "Control Measures Generally" to provide for the adoption of stormwater management criteria; and Resolution adopting a new section of the Design and Construction Standards Manual entitled "Stormwa Management Criteria."(CONTINUED FROM OCTOBER 24 1989)(WILL BE CONTINUED TO DECEMBER 19 1989. CONTINUED TO 12/19/89 P• FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance repealing Ordinance 83-174 and adopt a new ordinance requiring the filing of a disclosure statement of economic interests and other specified information pursuant to Sectio 2.1-639.14 of the Code of Virginia. BLJ/SAM TO APPROVE 1ST READING 2ND - 12/19/89 Q. CITIZENS COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS 1. ALFRED POWELL 3440 FRANKLIN STREET SPORE CONCERNING ADDING PROFFER OF CONDITIONS TO REZONING PETITIONS. ADVISED THAT PETITIONERS FELT THAT THIS "BLACI~IAil" IN ORDER TO ENSURE APPROVAL OF THE REZOK REQUEST. EXECUTIVE SESSION PURSUANT TO CODE OF VIRGINIA 2.1-344 A (7) T CONSULT WITH LEGAL COUNSEL PERTAINING TO LETTER MATTERS REQUIR THE PROVISION OF LEGAL ADVICE BY COUNSEL: CONSOLIDATION HCN/BLJ AT 8:00 P.M. CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE SESSION R-112889-10 LG/HCN AT 9:05 P.M. AYES-BIJ,RR,HCN,LG ABSENT-SAM MHA DIRECTED TO GET WRITTEN CERITIFICATION FROM SAM. R. ADJOURNMENT BLJ/HCN AT 9:07 P.M. UW • 1~ t~t , 1~'~ 1~ O U z O `wU`/ t~ 1~1 ~••I i~l a _ ,4 -~ -. °` +y :°. C U C GQ C b .~. 0.. ti a" b E E b ~. ~ N w Y C O U C G y .~ b ~ ~ ,C .~. P. ~ ~ ~ P. o R7 ~ c ~ ~b ~ C U ~'". C CO C ` ~, a ~; ~= .O W '~ O w O 7 rT~1 F-~-~ h~ 0 F~ ~ • '~ ~ '~ O U~ • }~ ~ ° ~ _ ~ u ~ _ ~ ~ U ~ ~ ~ ~ p~ ~ ~ ~ W O ~ ~ ~ O ~ 'O ~ CJ ~ ~ ~ O '~ N w Q ~' 00 Z "~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~' ~ W ~¢ ' ao o ~ a~ U . ~ ~ ~ ~ .° a ~° a W ~ cn a U .a .-a ~a GC [ ^~ ~ ~ N G °~ yam, '~3 ~ ; >~ O 4.. ~ U ~ O ni ~. 'fJ ~ ~`'~ ~C' ~~_~ "°,. 4 N ~ ~ ~ y C 'O O ''~ . O N -~ cV ° ~ u C ~ `~ ~ Q ~ ~ G' ~ ~ ~ TS cv ~ E /~ ~ ~ .. V \ y .~ .~ ~ . . ~~~ ~~~yy ~ /~ "V U ~.y O ~ O ~a ~ ~ .~ ~ Q '~ T ~ ~ a ~~ ~ o J ,o o .~ ~i C ~ ~~ O ~ ~ r _ti ~ a~ ~ ~ ° ., Q x i ~, !'. b QO :~ b flj s~} ~ ~ r ', r '~~ ~ ' . W ='~4 , ~~ ~~ ~ ?? cco ~ ~ v a~ 3 ~ .n .--i ~ ~'. ~ pp ~ M b F- W V „'~ R ~ O~ ' c~ ~ y '~" ~ .--i C O C ~ O ~ b O T ~ C b.0 ICI v -o `"' '~ ~ " ~ ° ~ ~ E ~/ ~ +~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ S"•, O .. Q. '~ Cl ° y ~ o C = ' ^ . a~ C. V] O [ C ~ U ~ ~ ca ~ o o i. W Y_I ~, ,n °~ .° E ~ .ti ~ ~ ° Y ~' ~ ~ ~ w ~ ~ U L.Q woo ~~ ° ~y _ ~ c o 3 0" ~ ~(~~~llIl,III~Il~Il7l WHEREAS, the NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF COUNTY TREASURERS AND FINANCE O1 CERS (NACTFO) at the Annual Legislative Conference in Washington, D.G., in March, NACTFO B discussed having a Code of Ethics, and President Bill Melton appointed Bob Ryan to Chair a CommittE draft a NACTFO Code of Ethics to present to the July 1989 meeting, and WHEREAS, the NACTFO member advocate, County Treasurers, and Finance Officials of the United S could adapt and adopt this Code of Ethics. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED ,that the Board of Directors of the NATIONAL ASSO~ TION OF COUNTY TREASURERS AND FINANCE OFFICERS (NACTFO) hereby adopts the fol ing Code of Ethics. This Code of Ethics consists of principles guiding the member's conduct and profess practice. It is the member's duty to practice and conduct themselves according to this of Ethics. All Members of NACTFO shall: Integrity Conduct activities in a manner that will reflect credit upon themselves and the Nation sociation of County Treasurers and Finance Officers. Exhibit loyalty and trust in the a and interest of the government they serve. They shall respect the rights, responsibilitie integrity of their colleagues and other public officials with whom they work and associ Responsibility The County Treasurers and Finance Officers shall administer the duties of the offic that the maximum of service at minimal cost is provided to the public. It is the responsi of the members to keep up to date through appropriate education with techniques, e ment and market changes to provide the highest quality of performance and advice. shall exercise prudence in the management of funds in their custody and in all fin; transactions. Conflict They shall faithfully comply with the laws and regulations of their jurisdiction and them to everyone alike. They shall refrain from personal business activity that could co with the performance of their duties. They shall conform in all respects to this Co Ethics, the By Laws of the National Association of County Treasurers and Finance Of as the same may be amended from time to time. APPROVED this 15th day of July, 1989 in Cincinnati, Ohio. Bill Melton, Pre: ATTEST: Sharon Shipley, Secretary Robert Ryan, Chair Code of Ethics Committee Clara Benisek, Chair Resolutions Committee National Association of County Treasurers & Finance Officer TREASURYMARKS 3 ~! ROANORE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA DECEMBER 5, 1989 - 7 P.M. ~f i a - /9 ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER - COMMUNITY ROOM PUBLIC HEARING: I. Call to Order J. Invocation/Pledge of Allegiance: Ryle Robinson R. Zoning Ordinance Revision Update L. Public Hearing Petitions: 1. (CONTINUED) Petition of Roanoke County Board of Supervisors to rez< approximately 35 acres from R-1 to M-1 for mixed use developmen ~~ generally located south of I-81 and west of Plantation Road, Holli ~~, ~~ Magisterial District. ~' 2. Petition of James & Charlotte Moore to conditionally rezone 3.13 ac: from R-1 to R-E to allow two horses, located at 6044 Cove Road, Cata~ Magisterial District. 3. Petition of Nolan Jackson to rezone 4.47 acres from R-3 to B-1 construct an office park, located at the southwest corner of Cresth; Drive and Garst Mill Road, Windsor Hills Magisterial District. 4. Petition of Virginia Asphalt Paving Co., Inc. to amend the Future Land Plan map designation of a 24.09 acre tract from Rural Village to Princi Industrial and to conditionally rezone said property from M-2 to M-3 construct an asphalt batch mix plant, generally located south of B Mountain Road and east of the Blue Ridge Parkway, Cave Spring MagisteY District. 5. Petition of Roanoke County Board of Supervisors to rezone approximately acres from A-1 to M-1 for industrial development; one tract located so of Friendship Lane; one tract adjacent to the northeast boundary of and approximately 75 feet northeast from the end of Lila Drive, Holl V` ~~ Magisterial District. M. Final Orders N. Adjournment LEGAL NOTICE ROANORE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a p hearing at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, December 19, 1989 in the Comm Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 3738 Bramb Avenue, Roanoke, VA, on the petition of James and Charlotte Moo. conditionally rezone 3.13 acres from R-1 to R-E to allow two ho located at 6044 Cove Road in the Catawba Magisterial District. A copy of this application is available for inspection i Department of Planning and Zoning, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, Roar VA. Dated: November 30, 1989 ~, Mary H. Allen, Clerk Please publish in the evening edition of the Roanoke Times & World-News Tuesday, December 5, 1989 Tuesday, December 12, 1989 To be paid on delivery LEGAL NOTICE ROANORE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a hearing at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, December 19, 1989 in the Com Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 3738 Bran Avenue, Roanoke, VA, on the following requests: 1. Petition of Roanoke County Board of Supervisors to approximately 35 acres from R-1 to M-1 for mixe development, generally located south of I-81 and w Plantation Road, Hollins Magisterial District. 2. Petition of Roanoke County Board of Supervisors to approximately 19 acres from A-1 to M-1 for indu: development; one tract located south of Friendship Lar tract adjacent to the northeast boundary of IT approximately 75 feet northeast from the end of Lila Hollins Magisterial District. A copy of this application is available for inspection Department of Planning and Zoning, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, Roy VA. Dated: November 30, 1989 _ _~- Mary H. A en, Clerk Please publish in the evening edition of the Roanoke Times & World-News Tuesday, December 5, 1989 Tuesday, December 12, 1989 Direct the bill for publication to: Roanoke County Board of Supervisors P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 772-2003 LEGAL NOTICE ROANORE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ubl is Board of Supervisors will hold a P The Roanoke County December 19, 1989 in 3738 Br mbleto~ hearing at 7 p.m. on Tuesday. Administration Centerhalt Paving Co. Room of the Roanoke County etition of Virginia Asp Roanoke, VA, on the p designation of a 24.0 Avenue, al Zndustrial and t Znc. to amend th RuralrVillage toPPrinciP acre tract from ro erty from M-2 to M-3 to construct a conditionally rezone said P p located south of Bu Magisterie asphalt batch mix plant, generally Cave Spring Road and east of the Blue Ridge ParkwaY- District. ection in t] lication is3738 grambleton Avenue, Roanoke A copy of this ap and Zoning, Department of Planning V A . ~/ Dated: November 30, 1989 Clerk Mary H. Al en, ublish in the evening edition Please p of the Roanoke Times & World-News Tuesday, December 5, 1989 Tuesday, December 12, 1989 Direct Locke1Rakesr Gentry P.O. Box Vp,124005 Roanoke, (703) 982-8000 publication to: & Moore LEGAL NOTICE ROANORE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ubl is Board of Supervisors will hold a p The Roanoke County pecember 19, 1989 in 3738 grambleto! hearing at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, Administration Center, Room of the Roanoke o ° theypetition of Nolan Jackaok,tiocated at t Avenue, Roanoke, VA, an office p i n th acres from R-3 to B-1 to construct t corner of Cresthill Drive and Garst Mill Roa southwes isterial District. Windsor Hills Mag ection in tY lication is3738 grambleton Avenue, Roanoke A copy of this ap and Zoning, Department of Planning V A . ~/, November 30, 1989 `~ H. All , Clerk Dated: Mary Please publish in the evening edition of the Roanoke Times & World-News Tuesday, December 5, 1989 Tuesday, December 12, 1989 Direct the bill for publication to: Lawson Associates 4725 Garst Mill Road Roanoke, VA 24018 (703) 772-3999 i i i f i PUBLIC NOTICE t Please be advised that the Board of Supervisors of Roan County, Virginia, at its meeting on December 19, 1989 at Roanoke County Administration Center, 3738 Brambleton Aven Roanoke, Virginia, at the evening session beginning at 7:00 p will hold a public hearing on the following: ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 8, "EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL" OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE BY AMENDING SECTION 8-11(a), "CONTROL MEASURES GENERALLY" TO PROVIDE FOR THE ADOPTION OF STORMWATER MANAGEMENT CRITERIA All members of the public interested in the matter set fo: above may appear end be heard at the time and place aforesaid. M~ ~Y~ Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney Roanoke County, Virginia , Publish on the following dates in the morning edition: December 5, 1989 - _~ December 12, 1989 Send invoice to: Board of Supervisors P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, Virginia 24018-0798 ROANORE WORK SESSIONS POBLIC HEARINGS WORK SESSION: COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA DECEMBER 5, 1989 2 P.M. (DOWNSTAIRS CONFERENCE ROOM) 7 P.M. (COMMUNITY ROOM) l ~=~ A. Call to Order B. Approval of Agenda C. Approval of Minutes: November 21, 1989 p. Consent Agenda: January 2, 1990 1. Petition of Roanoke County Board of Supervisors to amend the Future L Use Plan map designation of a 53.44 acre tract from Development Principal Industrial and to rezone said property from R-E to M-1 industrial development, located east of West Ruritan Road and north Homestead Lane, Hollins Magisterial District. 2. Petition of Roanoke County Board of Supervisors to amend the Future I G_ Use Plan map designation of a~roximately 105 acres from Development from R-E to M-1 ert ro aid l d f L/ y p p to rezone s an Principal Industria a N industrial developrent, located between Routes 11/460 and Carson Ro Hollins Magisterial District. 3. Petition of Roanoke County Board of Supervisors to amend the Future I Use Plan map designation of approximately 115 acres from Development ~D~ ~'f}~ Principal Industrial and to rezone said property from A-1 to M-1 industrial development, located west of Carson Road and south of ~YY adjacent to the Blue Ridge Parkway, Hollins Magisterial District. 4. Petition of Fralin & Waldron, Inc. to amend proffered condition: approximately 3.9 acres, to construct an office park in accordance wit concept plan dated March 28, 1988, located on the north side of Route at the intersection of Chaparral Drive, Cave Spring Magisterial DistriC~ 5. Petition of Aerospace Research Corporation to rezone approximately acres from M-2 to R-1 to develop a subdivision, located off of Route (Aerospace Road), Vinton Magisterial District. 6. Petition of Brambleton Storage Corporation amend the proffered oondit on a 1.01 acre tract in accordance with a concept plan dated November 1989 and to conditionally rezone a 1.016 acre tract from B-2 to M- construct mini-warehouses, located generally behind 3707 and Brambleton Avenue, Windsor Hills Magisterial District. 7. Petition of Professional Services Industries Inc. to conditionally re a .68 acre tract from B-2 to M-1 to permit storage and fabrication metal products, located at 4920 Cove Road, Catawba Magisterial District 8. Petition of Virginia Association of Amateur Swimmers Inc. to condition rezone approximately 11.10 acres from M-1 to B-2 to construct an aqu training and oor~petition center, located on Merriman Road south of Cry Creek Drive, Cave Spring Magisterial District. E. Discussion of Atlantic Concrete Proffers F. Site Viewing G. Discussion of Dates for: (1} December Work Session (2) January Public Hearing (3) Work Session for Review Proposed Rural Ordinance H. Comments of Planning Commissioners and Planning Staff Adjournment for Dinner O~ p~OANp~.~ ~ 9 2 7 z a 18 ~~ 88 $FSQUICENTENN~P~ A Beauti~ulBeginning COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE November 3, 1989 Mr. Deane N. Aboudara, President Bridlewood Property Owners Association 5852 Saddleridge Road Roanoke, Va. 24018 Dear Mr . pboudara BOARD OF SUPERV LEE G ARRETT.CF WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL RICHARD W. ROBERS. VICE-CE CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAI BOB L. Jt HOLLINS MAGISTERIAI STEVEN A.~ CATAWBA MAGISTERIAI HARRY C. I VIN TON MAGISTE RIA Supervisor Dick Robers has asked me to contact you your request to present a resolution to the Board of re arding the water service in your community. concernin Supervisor g The Board of Supervisors will meet on November 15, 1989 at 3:D m. and 7:00 p.m. and c p,m,, November 28, 1989 at 3:00 p• Robez December 19, 1989 at 3:00 p.m• and 7:00 p.m. Mr• suggests that you present your request at an the po tion eoflt~ under Citizens Comments and Communications, uests of t} agenda set aside for citizens to speak or make req Board. Please let me know which of these meetings you would prefer resentation and I will place you on the agenda. Y' make your p may contact me at 772-2003. If I can assist you further, please let me know. Sincerely, ~• Mary H. Allen Clerk to the Board of Supervisors CC: Supervisor Richard Robers (~oiYnt~ of ~,~ottnnk~ P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24018-0798 (703% 772-2004 z, '~+~.. :i ; j .. . Mr. Di Rovers Roanoke my Board of Supervisors 3738 Brambl on Avenue. S.W. Roanoke, VA 2 18` Dear Mr. Rovers: ~~ 5852 Saddleridge Road Roanoke, VA 24018 October 24, 1989 The purpose of this letter is to request your presentation of the attached document at the earliest possible meeting of the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors. As you will note, there are significant inequities and deficiencies in the private water system servicing the Bridlewood Subdivision, and we would like to solicit the assistance of the Board to remedy these problems. If allowed, there will be a Director of the Bridlewood Property Owners Association, Inc., at your meeting to answer any questions that might arise. Please advise if this is possible, and if so, the date and time. The residents of Bridlewood Subdivision appreciate your interest in our situation and any assistance that you might provide in putting our request on the Board's agenda. Si cerely, `~ ~, Deane N. Aboudara, President Bridlewood Property Owners Association, Inc. DNA : b j r Attachment cc: Lee Garrett, Chairman, Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Linda Griffin, Secretary, BPOA, Inc. cater supplq from a private supPl ~gg,AS, the Bridlewood Subdivision receives it' subdivisions on the Roanoke Cou: at an increased cost for wa~i~ over the neighboring Water System; and drants serving the 100+ homes in three (3) fire by a to permit ~gE,AS, of the existing ressure and storag sub sion, only one hydrant ~,rovides the minimum P and use of afire pumper hose connection; uired by fed stem serving this subdivision is not req and WHEREAS, the private sy lied water and does not do so; standards to report on lead content of its supP half of t Served in the owes utage; and ~EgEAB, of the 104 residence ~e8su=e upon a utility P lose water p dwellings immediately eriencing a power oui WHEREAS; there is a difference in quality of service when exp an is water fees due to the matter of a power ou ,5, there exists an inequity and of the n there is a dissatisfaction bq the residents of this inequity; S, uality reporting, and of fire safety aad the matter of water q rivate system serving the Bridlewood Subdivision 1 ~,gg,AB, connection of the Water System is a practical endeavor not invc existing Roanoke County extraordinary capital expense. Owners Association, Inc. as the represent at pgE, the Bridlewood Proper owners does hereby request the Roanoke Count} ro ertq itimate and of a priority to the well being of these P P lea as leg surplus be allowed to the Roanok~he ugrid of Supervisors to acknowledge this p funds of the announced Roanoke Coun y urchase the private system presently serving Department to F Subdivision. ~'~ J~ '~ ~~ ~ Dean N. Ab udara, President Octo er 23, 1989 COST OF WATER IN THE BRIDLEWOOD SUBDIVISION GALLONS OF WATER 0 10,000 20,000 30,000 COST IN DOLLARS RNK~ ~ ~~- 14.02 17.00 24.42 26.50 34.82 46.55 45.22 68.05 Supervisor Johnson: Some of these sites are almost inaccessib unless we fix the road problems. It seems to me that ..if we're going to get in the business, let's get in the business. We need a report from the staff on what it'll take in the way increased staff....if we wait for VDOT to engineer these proje some of us will be dead - that's how long it will take. It se to me that in the highway initiatives sponsored by the Governo staff that there are provision for localities to engineer and front the costs and be reimbursed at a later time rather than having VDOT doing all the proposals for us. If we're seriousl entertaining the prospect of getting in this business, I think its time to start fixing the infrastructure problem. We have excellent staff to solve those in water and sewer, we have a marketing department, we can fast track this through zoning, planning and everything but when it comes down to being able t access the property we tend to fall short. We did that with Valleypointe. So we don't fall into that same trap, perhaps, staff can bring us forth a proposal to see how this has been c in other counties like Chesterfield and Fairfax - how those st have heel able to front end those necessary studies and even k the projects so that we can fast track it. _'-,~. ~~ MEMORANDUM TO: Elmer C. Hodge, County Admini FROM: Phillip T. Henry, Director of Engineering ~~~'`G SUBJECT: Request by Board of Supervisor Member Bob L. Johnson, Concerning Hiring an Engineer for Road Improvements DATE: October 26, 1989 Approximate six (6) weeks ago the Board of Supervisors considered the direction for future Economic Development Activities. The direction was preparation of future sites wh. could be ready when an industry was looking for a location. relation to that discussion, Mr. Johnson, asked for informati~ concerning the needs and abilities of Roanoke County to pursue Road Improvements for these future sites. In response to this inquiry is the following information: 1. Whether funding is local, state or a combination, I would estimate the cost of survey, design, preparat of plan, specifications, project administration and inspection to cost between $80,000 and $100,000 per $1,000,000 of construction. Therefore, additional requirements for the Engineering Department for eac One Million Dollars of project cost per year would one design engineer, one draftsperson, and one construction inspector. Depending on the status of other projects the construction inspector may or ma not be necessary. 2. In accordance to Section 33.1-70.01 of the Code of Virginia, The Board of Supervisors jointly with the Resident Engineer for VDOT prepare a Six Year Plan Improvement to Secondary Road Systems in the County Since the Six Year Plan reflects projected needs fo road improvements, I believe it is within the Count authority to establish Economic Development as a criteria for road needs. Specifically adding secon road improvements to the Six Year Secondary Road Construction Plan to benefit Economic Development, could be done by the Board of Supervisors. 3. Section 33 1-75 3 Construction and Improvement of Primary and Secondary Roads by Counties. ~~ Paragraph A Say that these requirement apply to several Counties listed, and any County either havin an Urban County Executive form of Government or havi a population which exceeds 125,000. Since Roanoke County is not specifically listed in paragraph "A" a I don't believe would qualify under the Urban County Executive Form of Government, then Roanoke County could not participate in construction and future reimbursement of Secondary or Primary Road Projects. Paragraph "D" does provide that the Counties listed may undertake activities toward the design, land acquisition, or construction of Primary or Secondary Roadway Projects, that have been included in the Six Year Plan. Within that paragraph, provisions are also specified as to entering into contracts and the ability for the Virginia Department of Transportatic to reimburse the County for expenses incurred in carrying out these activities. I am forwarding a copy of this memo to Mr. Mahoney, Count Attorney, for him to make an official determination as to when Roanoke County does qualify under this particular section. pc: Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney John R. Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator of Community Services & Development ~y ~.,. ,~L- $ 33.1-70.01 CODE OF VIRGINIA § 33.1-7i Cross reference. -For provisions covering the subject matter of the repealed section, see § 33.1-70.01. § 33.1-70.01. Annual meeting with county officers; six-year plan county roads. -The board of supervisors or other governing body of E county in the secondary system may, jointly with the resident engineer for Department of Highways and Transportation or other representatives of Department as designated by the State Highway and Transportation Com: sinner, prepare a six-year plan for the improvements to the secondary ~ system in that county. Each such six-year plan shall be based upon the estimate of funds to be available to the county for expenditure in the six-~ period on the secondary system. Each such plan shall list the proposed imps ments, together with an estimated cost of each project so listed. Following preparation of the plan, the board of supervisors or other governing body s conduct a public hearing after publishing notice in a newspaper publishe or having general circulation in the county once a week for two succes weeks, and posting notice of the proposed hearing at the front door of courthouse of such county ten days before such meeting. At the public heari which shall be conducted jointly byy the board of supervisors and the resentative of the Department of Hi hways and Transportation, the ei six-year plan shall be discussed with the citizens of the county and their v considered. Following such discussion, the board of supervisors or o governing body, together with the representative of the Departmen Highways and Transportation, shall finalize and officially adopt the six- plan which shall then be considered the official plan of the county. At least once in each calendar year representatives of the Departme~ Highways and Transportation in charge of such secondary system of highways in each county, or some representative of the Department design by the State Highway and Transportation Commissioner, shall meet watt board of supervisors or other governing body of each county in a regale special meeting of such board or other governing body for the purpose of pre ing a budget for the expenditure of improvement funds for the next fiscal ~ The representative of the Department of Highways and Transportation t furnish the board of supervisors with an updated estimate of funds ana board and the representative of the Department of Highways and Transp~ tion shall jointly prepare the list of projects to be carried out in that fiscal taken from the six-year plan by order of priority, and following generally policies of the State Highway and Transportation Commission in regard t, statewide secondary system improvements. Such list of priorities shall the ppresented at a public hearing duly advertised in accordance with the proce hereinbefore outlined, and comments of citizens shall be obtained and sidered. Following this public hearing, the board, with the concurrence o representative of the Department of Highways and Transportation, adopt, as official, a priority program for the ensuing year, and the Depart of Highways and Transportation shall include such listed projects in its ondary roads budget for the county for that year. At least once every two years, following the adoption of the original six• plan, the board of supervisors or other governing body of eaci; county, ~:~gt with the representative of the Department of Highways and Transports shall update the six-year plan of such county by adding to it and extendi as necessary so as to maintain it as a plan encompassing six years. Wher additional funds for secondary road purposes become .available, the gove~ body may request a revision In such six-year plan in order that such p1F amended to provide for the expenditure of such additional funds. Such tions and extensions to each six-year plan shall be prepared in the 36 .. ~' , ~, y! ;~j ~ .. j\ § 33.1-70.1 HIGHWAYS, BRIDGES AND FERRIES § 33.1.7 manner and following the same procedures as outlined herein for its ini' preparation. Where the board of supervisors or other governing body and resident engineer or other representative of the Department of Highways ~ Transportation fail to agree uppon a priority program, the board or govern body may appeal to the State Hi hway and Transportation Commissioner. ' Commissioner shall consider all proposed priorities and render a deci: sionerl of theawelfare and safety of county c tizens.eSuch decision shall binding. All such six-year plans shall consider all existing roads in the seconc system, including those in the towns located in the county that are maintai (Code 950, § 33 7 01970a c. 322 a 977, c 3578; 1979, ce 64; 19181acc 241 § 33.1-70.1. Requesting Department to hard-surface secondary rc - Whenever the governing body of any county, after consultatidn ~ personnel of the Department of Highways and Transportation may ado resolution requesting the Department of Highways and Transportatio. hard-surface any secondary road in such county which carries fifty or z vehicles per day with a hard surface of width and strength adequate for traffic volume, the Department of Higbhways and Transportation shall c to grated tto such county. (1973, c. 3 0; 1977,c P 57g jy in expending the fi al § 33.1-71. Annual statement concerning improvements to be i with county governing bodies. -The Department of Highways and'I5 portation shall within a reasonable time after the close of each fiscal yea with each of the several boards of supervisors or other governing bodi counties a statement setting forth: (a) each highway, designated by nun located in the county upon which improvements were made during such i year, (b) the amount expended for improvements on each such highway di such fiscal year, and (c) the nature of such improvement. (Code 1950, § 33- 1958, c. 317; 1970, c. 322.) . § 33.1-72: Repealed by Acts 1979, c. 321. Cross reference. -For new section relating to similar subject matter, see $ 33.1-72.1. § 33.1-72.1. Taking certain streets into secondary system. - "Street," as used in this section, means a street or highway shown on : which was recorded or otherwise opened to public use poor to July 1, 19 which time it was open to and used by motor vehicles, and which, fo reason, has not been taken into the secondary system of state highway serves at least three families per mile. B. "County,"as used in this section, means a county in which the seco system of the state highways is constructed and maintained by the Depar of Highways and Transportation and which has adopted a local ordinar. control of the development of subdivision streets to the necessary standa~ acceptance into the secondary system. ,. C. Whenever the governing body of a county recommends i~~ -e.~riti':,e Department of Highways and Transportation that any street in the cou taken into and become a part of the secondary system of the state hi hw such county, the Department of Highways and Transportation then within the limit of available funds and the mileage available in such i 37 ~- . § 33.1-75.3 HIGHWAYS, BR.IDGE3 AND FERRIES § 33.1= § 33.1-75.3. Construction and improvement of primary or second roads by counties. - A. Notwithstanding an~p(., other provisions of .. . ., - ---__-_-- t-,.a.. ,.c T..,,,ne (^!;+., (:n,,.,hs N7`Ar~P.Y'iC1C County. IAUC enve m t e sa e o on or federal revenue snanng ~tte~rs, purpose of constructing or improving roads, including curbs, gu ageways, sound barriers, sidewalks, and all other features or appurtena conducive to the public safety and convenience, which either have bee may be taken into the primary or secondary system of state highways. Pr planning and the acquisition ofrights-of--way shall be under the control au the direction of the county, subject to the approval of project plans s ecifications by the Department of 'I~ansportation. All costs incurred b` Department of Transportation in administering such contracts shat reimbursed from the county's general revenues, from revenues derived the sale of bonds, or from the county's federal revenue sharing funds, or costs may be charged against the funds which the county may be entitl under the provisions of §§ 33.1-23.1, 33.1-23.2 or § 33.1-23.4. B. projects undertaken under the authority of subsection A of this se shall not diminish the funds to which a county ma be entitled ands: provisions of §§ 33.1-23.1, 33.1-23.2, 33.1-23.4, or ~ 33.1-75.1. C. At the request of the county the Department of 'I4'ansportation agree to undertake the design, nght-of-way acquisition or constructi~ rojects funded by the county. In such situations the Departme~ ~ansportation and the county will enter into an agreement specifyin relevant procedures and responsibilities concerning the design, nghtrol acquisition, construction or contract administration of projects to be fund the county. The county will reimburse the Department of 'I4~ansportati< all costs incurred by the Department in carrying out the aforesaid actr from general revenues or revenues derived from the sale of bonds. D. Notwithstanding any contrary provision of =aw, the county or J..~- _ ~lth Transportation Board. In such situ ion and the county shall enter into an concurrence of the Department of Transportation, reimburse the county for expenses incurred In ca t program c the Departm wlllcn Llle COtlil ~y uaay VG GuYa VaG... w w.~v- ..-~ a---------- ~ county may undertake these activities in accordance with all appl county procedures, provided the Commissioner finds that those i procedures are substantially similar to departmental procedures and ~ cations. (1981, c. 321; 1982, c. 218; 1983, cc. 321, 325; 1984, c. 127; 1'. 562; 1988, c. 654; 1989, c. 143.) The 1986 amendment deleted "exceed fifty- iatration of contracts awarded by the cc five million dollars in any five consecutive road construction or improvement i fiscal years nor" preceding "diminish the undertaken by the Department of Tra funds" in subsection B. tioa," deleted the former subsection C The 1988 amendment deleted the last sere- ing to project coordination procedu fence in subsection A which read '"The admire- added the present subsections C and 32 .. ~ ~. ~ ' , ~ § 33.1-70.1 HIGHWAYS, BRIDGES AND FERRIES § 33.1-' manner and following the same procedures as outlined herein for its ini preparation. Where the board of supervisors or other governing body and resident engineer or other representative of the Department of Highways '~.ansportation fail to agree uppon a priority program, the board or ~overi body may appeal to the State Hi hway and Transportation Commissioner. Commissioner shall consider all proposed priorities and render a deci establishing a priority program based upon a consideration by the Com sinner of the welfaze and safety of county citizens. Such decision shal binding. All such six-year plans shall consider all existing roads in the secon~ system, including those in the towns located in the county that are mainta Code 950,t§ 33 1 70e19 Oa c. 322e 977,c 3578; 1979, ce 64; 9181acc24 § 33.1-70.1. Requesting Department to hard-surface secondary r - Whenever the governing body of any county, after consultatidn personnel of the Department of Highways and Transportation may adc resolution requesting the Department of Highways and Transportatic hazd-surface any secondary road in such county which carries fifty or , vehicles per day with a hard surface of width and strength adequate for traffic volume, the Department of Highways and Transportation shall consideration to such resolution in establishing priority in expending the f allocated to such county. (1973, c. 360; 1977, c. 578.) § 33.1-71. Annual statement concerning improvements to be with county governing bodies. -The Department of Highways and T portation shall within a reasonable time after the close of each fiscal yea with each of the several boazds of supervisors or other governing both counties a statement setting forth: (a) each highway, designated by nw located in the county upon which improvements were made during such year, (b) the amount expended for improvements on each such highway d' such fiscal year, and (c) the nature of such improvement. (Code 1950, § 33 1958, c. 317; 1970, c. 322.) , § 33.1-72: Repealed by Acts 1979, c. 321. Cross reference. -For new section relating to similar subject matter, nee $ 33.1-72.1. § 33.1-72.1. Taking certain streets into secondary system. "Street," as used in this section, means a street or highway shown on which was recorded or otherwise opened to public use prior to July 1, 19 which time it was open to and used by motor vehicles, and which, fc reason, has not been taken into the secondary system of state highway serves at least three families per mile. B. "County,"as used in this section, means a county in which the sect system of the state highways is constructed and maintained by the DepaY of Highways and Transportation and which has adopted a local ordina~ control of the development of subdivision streets to the necessary stands acceptance into the secondary system. C. Whenever the governing body of a county recommends in writi~~~.g 1^iepartment of Highways and Transportation that any street in the cou taken into and become a part of the secondary system of the state hi by such county, the Department of Highways and Transportation tg er within the limit of available funds and the mileage available in such 37 § 33.1-70.01 CODE OF VIRGINIA Croea reference. -For provisions covering the subject matter of the repealed section, see 4 33.1-70.01. § 33.1-70.1 § 33.1-?0.01. Annual meeting with county officers; six-year plan f county roads. -The board of supervisors or other governing body of ear county in the secondary system may, jointly with the resident engineer for t: Department of Highways and Transportation or other representatives of t: Department as designated by the State Highway and Transportation Comm sinner, prepare a six-year plan for the improvements to the secondary ro system in that county. Each such six-year plan shall be based upon the bE estimate of funds to be available to the county for expenditure in the six-ye period on the secondary system. Each such plan shall list the proposed impro` merits, together with an estimated cost of each project so listed. Following t preparation of the plan, the board of supervisors or other governing body sh, conduct a public hearing after publishing notice in a newspaper published or having general circulation in the county once a week for two successi weeks, and posting notice of the proposed hearing at the front door of t courthouse of such county ten daps before such meeting. At the public hearin which shall be conducted jointly byy the board of supervisors and the rt resentative of the Department of Hi hways and Transportation, the ent: six-year plan shall be discussed with the citizens of the county and their vie considered. Following such discussion, the board of supervisors or ott governing body, together with the representative of the Department Highways and Transportation, shall finalize and officially adopt the six-ye plan which shall then be considered the official plan of the county. At least once in each calendar year representatives of the Department Higghways and Transportation in charge of such secondary system of st; highways in each county, or some representative of the Department designa~ by the State Highway and Transportation Commissioner, shall meet with 1 board of supervisors or other governing body of each county in a regular special meeting of such board or other governing body for the purpose of prep ing a budget for the expenditure of }mprovement funds for the next fiscal ye The representative of the Department of Highways and Transportation sh furnish the board of supervisors with an updated estimate of funds and board and the representative of the Department of Highways and Transpoi tion shall jointly prepare the list of projects to be carried out in that fiscal y~ taken from the six-year plan by order of priority, and following generally policies of the State Highway and Transportation Commission in regard to statewide secondary system improvements. Such list of priorities shall ther. ppresented at a public hearing duly advertised in accordance with the proced hereinbefore outlined, and comments of citizens shall be obtained and c sidered. Following this public hearing, the board, with the concurrence of representative of the Department of Highways and Transportation, sl adopt, as official, a priority program for the ensuing year, and the Departm of Highways and Transportation shall include such listed projects in its ondary roads budget for the county for that year. At least once every two years, following the adoption of the original six y plan, the board of supervisors or other governing body of ea.,h eb~~~:~', s.~g-t with the representative of the Department of Highways and Transportat shall update the six-year plan of such county by adding to it and extendin as necessary so as to maintain it as a plan encompassing six years. Whene additional funds for secondary road purposes become .available, the goverr body may request a revision in such six-year plan in order that such play amended to provide for the expenditure of such additional funds. Such a tions and extensions to each six-year plan shall be prepared in the s~ 36 ,~ .. j ~, § 33.1-75.3 HIGHWAYS, BRIDGES AND FERRIES : § 33.1• § 33.1-75.3. Construction and improvement of primary or secon~ roads by counties. A. Notwithstanding an}{~~. other1~provisionsT Hof .. -_----- L_~-- ..C T..-«.,o !"~;4.. (!n,ir~v N7PflAT1(:K CAUIItV. l.ow env om t e sa e o on or federal revenue snanng tunas iv, purpose of constructing or improving roads, including curbs, gutters, d ageways, sound barriers, sidewalks, and all other features or appurtena conducive to the public safety and convenience, which either have bey may be taken into the primary or secondary system of state highways. P~ planning and the acquisition ofrights-of--way shall be under the control a the direction of the county, subject to the approval of project plan. specifications by the Department of Transportation. All costs incurred b Department of Transportation in admiiustering such contracts sha reimbursed from the county's general revenues, from revenues derived the sale of bonds, or from the county's federal revenue sharing funds, or costs may be charged against the funds which the county may be entit: under the provisions of §§ 33.1-23.1, 33.1-23.2 or § 33.1-23.4. B. projects undertaken under the authority of subsection A of this si shall not diminish the funds to which a county ma be entitled unde provisions of §§ 33.1-23.1, 33.1-23.2, 33.1-23.4, or ~ 33.1-75.1. C. At the request of the county the Department of Transportation agree to undertake the design, nght-of-way acquisition or constructs ro~ects funded by the county. In such situations the Departure ~ansportation and the county will enter into an agreement apecifyi~ relevant procedures and responsibilities concerning the design, nght-c acquisition, construction or contract administration of projects to be font the county. The county will reimburse the Department of Transportati all costs incurred by the Department in carrying out the aforesaid act'. from eneral revenues or revenues derived from the sale of bonds. *, ~T..i.-.: i1. a+...,.7;,,.r onv mntrarv Drovi810n Of law, the coin or Transportation Board. In such situ; and the county shall enter into an t program the Departn .,y ,,..~ ..,..r......_.__-. - concurrence of the Department of 'I~anaportation, an , reimburse the county for eapenses incurred in carryin - n,•.f nr county may undertake these activities in accordance with all app county procedures, provided ,the Commissioner finds that those procedures are substantially similar to departmental procedures and cations. (1981, c. 321; 1982, c. 218; 1983, cc. 321, 325; 1984, c. 127; ] 562; 1988, c. 654; 1989, c. 143.) The 198b amendment deleted "eaceed fifty- istration of contracts awarded by the c five million dollars in any five consecutive road construction or improvement fiscal years nor" preceding "diminish the undertaken by the Department of 1~ funds" in subsection B. tioa," deleted the former subsection C The 1888 amendment deleted the last aen- ing to project coordination proced, fence in subsection A which read '°The admin- added the present subsections C any 32 t _, m ~ r ~_ s F N~ Z ~a N GARRETT CONGRATULATED STEVE MCGRAW ON BEING ELECTED PRESIDENT- ELECT OF VACo. R. CONSENT AGENDA R-111589-5 HCN REQUESTEDpROVE WITHOUTRITOMEK-60R DISCUSSION ` HCN/SAM TO AP ~ v~ U G ,~W~TH ~LJ, AB$~~E~1~...- ~ ~~, ~'. ~~ . x +.~:;=.,:;:.,~ ..,:_ ,7 '.. ,.,K J.f .._ .. ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CROUTINEAANDDWI~EBE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FT~TOITEM WILLIBEED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDEREI SEPARATELY. 1, Approval of Minutes - February 28, 1989, March 1~ 1989, March 28, 1989, April 11, 1989, April 25, 1989 . 2. Confirmation of committee appointments to the Industrial Development Authority and the Plannin Commission. A-111589-5.a 3, Request for acceptance of Williamsburg Court int the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System. R-111589-5.b 4, Request for acceptance of 0.23 miles of Stonewo~ Drive into the Virginia Deparement of Transportation Secondary Sy R-111589-5.c 5. Authorization to appropriate capital funds for Green Hill Park Improvements. A-111589-5.d 6, Authorization to execute a contracstem,establi: an integrated automated library sy REMOVED FROM CONSENT AGENDA SAM/LG TO DELAY TO EITHEHERIINFORMATION9 TO p,LLOW STAFF TO STUDY AND GATHER FURT URC WITH BLJ ABSENT 4 D. NEW BUSINESS 1. Resolution of Support for the Public Policy Platform of the Virginia Coalition for the Agi; and requests for state funding. R-111589-2 SUSAN WILLIAMS-AND PRENTISS WEBB LOA WERE PRESENT HCN/.SAM ~ TO AD(?PT_,. RESO ,_ ,.,. .....> ... _ .. ...., ....s ,. :., ... ~~ '~`fIT~i~ BLS ~$SENfi _ . ~ .. ~.,; , ,..... , : _ ., 2. Yearly Report from the Mental Health Services the Roanoke Valley. PRESENTED BY RITA GLINIECRI COUNTY APOINTEE FROM MHSRV HCN/SAM TO RECEIVE AND FILE URC WITH BLJ ABSENT 3. Authorization to provide employee dental insur plan. A-111589-3 SAM/LG TO APPROVE ALT.#1 DELTA DENTAL PLAN URC WITH BLJ ABSENT 4. Resolution regarding the Roanoke County Resour Authority Landfill Financing. HCN/SAM TO ADOPT RESO URC WITH BLJ ABSENT 5A. REPORT ON BONSACK FIRE STATION ECH TO BRING BACR DEFINITE DECISION ON 12/19/89 5B. REPORT ON IMPLEMENTATION OF POLICE DEPARTMENT PRESENTED BY ECH E. REQUEST FOR WORR SESSIONS F. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS 2 ~~,~ Lam" ~ ~ __-- nn _ MEMORANDLT] ~ ~x_t_._.~ T~- ~,~ c~ ~- Elmer Hodge, County Administrate c~--~-.~ TO: Asst. County Admin ~°~ John Hubbard, K--.Z Diane Hyatt, Director of Financ~e~ /~ ~, ~ ~_~ Director ~-= /c- Cliff Craig, Utility FROM: November 13, 1989 DATE: WateY Effect of City Bulk Rate Increase on Roanoke County SUBJECT: and Sewer Rates 's October 13, 1989 letter: I have received a copy of the City the bulk water and sewage treatment rate for the yeas establishing 1989. beginning July 1, ar - Water and Sewer rates theufollowi g conclusion Short Summ Bulk rates, After review of the new City can be made: WAS inning July 7 of Roanoke bulk water rate for the year beg The City er 100 cubic feet. We work in a mea00orga11ons0( 1989 is $0.73 p The above cost per 1, gallons not 100 cubic feet. er 1,000 gallons over t] $0.98. This is an increase of ear•on Which our budget was base proposed rate of the previous y rchase approximately one-half res nt anrincreasehof $6y 0 We pu Roanoke. The abo urchased water. This equates to an increase in our cost of p ivalent residential user. $2.42 per year for the average eciu -7.01 ~ 1986 is $ The current County water rate estab0l 0 gallons (same as $2.20 X month base charge plus $1.04 per 1, 00 allons) was established when the City bulk water rate ~ 1'0 g 000 gallons in 1986. $0.98 per 1, t effect of the proposed increase in the bulk wa less agr~ The ne 000 ($63,000 -x'14,000 credit) The redu that we will have $49~ ear than we did last year. revenue from re-sell th eff ciency in operation and increase cost in electricity, that loss. The cost of b customer about 45% ofrthehoverall water system cost: water i County water rate should remain unchanged at this time. h T e Page - 2 - SEWER The City sewage treatment rate for the year beginning July 1, 198! is $468.18 per million gallons. This is an increase of $7.83 pe: million gallon over the proposed sewer treatment rate of the previous year on which our budget was based. This increase wil represent an increase of approximately $20,000 in our cost o purchased treatment. This equates to an increase of $0.83 per yea for the average equivalent residential user. The County sewer rate that was established in July same as $1.7 per month base charge plus $0.78 per 1,000 gallons per 1,000 gallons or $1700 per million gallons) and was the 198 the sewage treatment rate was $454.46 per million gallons, actual sewage treatment rate was $389.87 and the 1988 actual wa $460.35. The avesewa e~erayear.r Theeincr ase of treatment coy millon gallons of g p from the time our rate was established and the prepared rate ~ $13 .72 per millio e g ment sco t $beingp reduced due to .taking tY overall sewage tr Starkey plant off-line, reduced electricity cost and reduction _ I&I, our actual revenue to treatment cost ratio will increa: leaving more funds 5oaofathe ovoer lle sewer systemrcostilitatio~ Treatment is about 2 The County sewer rate should remain unchanged at this time. CC:mh L. CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS JOYCE MORRIS, 1602 SALEM AVENUE ASKED THAT ROANORE COUNTY BRI BACK THE VALLEY METRO ROUTE TO CAVE SPRING CORNERS. PRESENTE PETITION FROM CITIZENS WHO USED THAT ROUTE.. J~ . TQ ~o ,rt~~~r ~~s~~ VA~~~_ ~~~~iQ ,~a:.~.cu..,~,N~1:..~8$zNG.~CK ;?~ M. REPORTS HCN/SAM TO RECEIVE AND FILE UW WITH BLJ ABSENT 1. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance 2. General Fund Unappropriated Balance 3. Board Contingency Fund N. EXECUTIVE SESSION pursuant to the Code of Virginia Section 2.1-344 NONE 0. CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE SESSION NONE P. ADJOURNMENT HCN/SAM AT 4:35 P.M. UW WITH BLJ ABSENT 5 O~ POANpf.~ ti ~ A Z~ ~~ \v - '':az~ 150 pp pp 1 ~ rep SFSQUICEN7ENN~P~ A Beauti~ulBeginning COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE August 21, 1989 Rev. Louis E. Cad on Cave Spring Ur~~ted Methodist church 4505 Hazel Dtive, S.W. Roanoke,.Wrginia 24018 Dea~~2everend Carson LEE GARRETT. C W INUSOR HILLS MAGISTERV RICHARD W. ROBERS. VICE-C CAVE SPRING MAGISTERL BOB L. . HOLLINS MAGISTERI. STEVEN A. CATAW BA MAGISTERI HARRY C. VIN TON MAGISTERI On behalf of the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors, I would like to thank you for giving the invocation at the Board Meetings in the past. We would again like to call on you to presen ou arelunablelto do Tuesday, December 19, 1989, at 3:00 p.m. If y ou soon t< this, please call me at 772-2005. I will be calling y see if this time is acceptable to you, or if you would prefer another date. The Board memur volunteering thewtimeyt o offer God's blessingha, appreciate yo their meetings. Sincerely, ~ ~`` ~, z '~.~~ ~, ~"~- _ , _ . ~~' j' ~ '~, .~ ~_ 1~, 1 I ,, ~, ~~ i ~ ->t- { 1 C~nurt~~ of ~n~tnn~~ BOARD OF SUPER' Brenda J. Holton, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors .- I ~, ~d - i I~..,'`, PO. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 2 4018-07 98 (703) 772-2004 { ,8~~ aE80U1CEq'(ENN~~~ A Bwati~w/Bcgierrieg COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE TO: FROM: DATE: C~nunfy of ~Rnttnukr BOARD OF SUF M E M O R A N D U M • LEE GARRE WINDSOR HILLS MAGIE RICHARD W ROBERS. VP CAVE SPRING MAGI! BOI HpLCINS MAGi`. STEVE ' GATAWBA MAGI' HARF Phillip Henry, Director, Engineering yINTON MAGI' t Harry C. Nickens I/ November 15 , 19 8 9 ~T~1~~ SUBJECT: BUSHDALE ROSE I have been unsuccessful in persuading the Woods Family to don. right-of-way between Hemmingway and Bushdale for the purpose constructing an access road. Please proceed in a timely fash with a plan for the upgrading and for providing access to Bushd Road. HCN/bjh cc: E1mer.Hodge ~,' / ~ ~ Cow ma"y"' ~e'`~ I/ - i aJ- ~r `~ P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24018-0798 (703) 772-2004 Tim: RE: The Policy you are writing for economic development connection fees: Mr. Hodge advised that he would like the following information i the report: The current provision in the Cadel~hfromltheSGeneraluFundto waiv the fee to the developer and p y Specify that this only establishes guidelines for that provision and the payback or recovery formula is as follows: 3 years or better - County pays back 100 3 - 5 years payback - 50-50 split a fee beyond 5 years - County will not p y He also advised that this policy will apply to all developments that will have a three year or better payback. Call him if you want further details. Mary Allen 12/7/89 9 `~~r.N ~~~ MEMORANDUM 1"~ ~ ~~ .~, e ~,,~:~ TO: Elmer Hodg ~,y„ ~. Board of Supervisors FROM: John Hubbard November 14, 1989 DATE: SUBJECT: Economic Development -Road Construction Mr. Johnson (September 12), the stafon of access rtoads to existing At the request of have County employees coordinate and expedite the constructs or new industrial sites. ne en sneer, experienced in road de To no ed a cess cro dst oe With the addition of o g nt staff can coordinate the desig ld coordinsatecthe h~ri g of outside design firms Cou y improvements. The staff engineer wou view and award bids, and coordinate the construction work. eterrnined at re The funding of the construction and deC gn wyrk would have to e ma be eligible for state funds and other later date on ae cons ru ted with lo~a funds. may have to b itional osition would be appro~mately $50,000 annually ph The cost of the add p 1ent. ~~r ~:~-j capital costs for a vehicle and equip ,~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~J .~ , TO 1,a.~'1 S TIME DATE ere Ou~ while you've MR/MS ~ ~~ OF PHONE AREA CODE ---- ^ TELEPHONED ^ PIEASE PHONE ^ CAME BY TO SEE YOU ^ WILL CALL AGAIN ^ WANTS TO SEE YOU ^ RETURNED YOUR CALL ..~cce(;F ~ ^ r ~ ~- ~~~~,~. t~A OINtIOPI MESSAGE TAKEN BY Theme' 703-362-4149 • FAX 703-362-4295 ACTION ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROAN COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENT MEETING DATE: l= November ~C4, 1989 AGENDA ITEM: To Amend and Repeal Section 603.0 of the Roan County Existing Structures Code Book that deals with eleva~ inspections. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND: In 1984, the Development and Inspections DepartmE implemented a bi-annual elevator inspection program pursuant the provision of Volume I of the Virginia Uniform Statew: Building Code. The elevator inspections were contracted tc local private inspection agency for code and safety compliance. Recent amendments to the 1987 Virginia Uniform Statew' Building Code has reduced the scope of the building co regarding the inspections of existing elevating equipment. ThE amendments basically removed the inspection authority from Vo1L I (New construction) to Volume II (Existing Structures). The amendments to the Virginia Uniform Statewide Build: Code have placed municipalities in the position of bei responsible for elevator inspections without providing t necessary guideline/enforcement powers to accomplish su inspections. Therefore, vulnerability exists should lawsu~ follow from incidents in which injured persons claim that the injuries resulted from the improper maintenance of elevat equipment. Since Volume II of the building code permi localities to delete provisions of the code that the localiti do not wish to enforce and in view of the fact, th municipalities have no authority to amend the provisions of t Uniform Statewide Building Code, it appears that the only prude response is to repeal those provisions of Volume II of t Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code related to t inspection of existing elevators. This action would not relie property owners from the responsibility of maintaining elevato in a safe condition but would relieve the municipality fr having to inspect existing elevators and would eliminate potential for liability exposure. This same response with reg to elevator inspection activities is occurring in many of Virginia localities, such as the City of Lynchburg and Fair County. Should the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors ad this policy, the Development and Inspections Department wo notify all property owners via the newpapers and with letters the program changes and the responsibility of owners to maint existing elevators in a safe condition. ALTERNATIVES AND IMPACTS: IMPACTS: If adopted there would not be any financial imp however, the responsibility and liability of inspections maintenance of elevator equipment would shift from Roanoke CoL to the elevator equipment owners. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Amend and delete the appropriate sections of Roanoke County Existing Structures Code that pertains elevators and elevating equipment. Roanoke County continue to provide this inspect service. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The staff recommends that Alternative 1 be approved and i the Board of Supervisors direct the County Attorney to draft appropriate Ordinance to be effective December 1, 1989. SUBMITTED BY: f~ s U,~ Arnold Covey Director of Developm nt and Inspections Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by: APPROVED: Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ACTION VOTE No Yes Garrett Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers ~A/`10-28-86-216 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE RVAA~OKEO IN ROANORE, MEETING DATE: October 28, 1986 ITEM NUMBER ~ _ OF SUPERVISORS OF ROp,NOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTEF N TUESDAY, SUBJECT: Adoption of the 1984 Basic Existing Structures Code COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Statewide Building Maintenance Ded elopmentn aso authoriz State Board of Housing and effective October 1, 1986. Due to tt by the General Assembly, recent State code adoptthe~ standardseandr relatedacodesCofnolc retain control over buildings not substantially altered, or and generalr welfare to c control is vital to the health, safety County citizens. In addition, this code v; slhousingnandRfutt County's efforts in improving our county Maintenance Cc development. The adoption of the 1984 Property Servic w i l l f u r t h e r a atiori of fortsCon hazardousnstructures . Department condemn FISCAL IMPACT: ~ The cost of implementing this required program should be minim since a large majority of structures withi St to CodeCo Howev considered "New Construction" as defined by ort should additional inspection positions and clerical supp considered within two tountv's futureainspe tiontneedsn °rdeY adequately meet Roanoke C Y RECOMMENDATION: The Staff recommends Structure Code in its Official be appointed 1, 1986. SUBMITTED BY: that Roanoke County adopt the 1984 Exist entirety and that the Chief Build as the enforcing agent, effective Nove~ - J es Nini er, r. Chief Buildin Official APPROVED: Elmer C. odg , Jr. County Administrator ., ~. A/10-28-86-216 ---------- ------------------------- VOTE ----- ACTION No yes Abs Approved (X) Motion by: HCN/LG Brittle % Denied ( ) Garrett X Received ( ) Johnson X Referred McGraw X To - Nickens X 10/29/86 cc: File Department of Development Building Official December 6, 1989 Mr. Cook: Mr. Hodge would like you to begin planning a retreat for the Boa of Supervisors, himself, and Paul Mahoney. His first choice for location is Smith Mountain, second is Hollins College. He wants to have it on the weekend between the January Board meetings -- Friday night, Saturday, and half a day on Sunday. He also wants to be able to give the Board members information the retreat (dates, site, etc.) at their December 19 meeting. r~~ µ. cc Mary Allen ALSO INCLUDES ROANOKE COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT