Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1/23/1990 - RegularP A N ,~, ~~ ~ F All-AM~~CA W 11 ti 9 /~/ ` ' , ~ ~~n~~~ ,~ ~~ ~~ C~~~ 18 .~ 88 ~ ~.9~g~9 aFSOU1CENTENNI~ A 8eauti~ttlBtginning ROANORE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ACTION AGENDA JANUARY 23, 1990 Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meeting. Regular meetings are held on the second Tuesday and. them on t e Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public hearings are held at 7:00 p. fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:15 P.M.) 1. Roll Call: ALL PRESENT 2. Invocation: AssistantbCounty Administrator 3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag. B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS BLT REQUESTED THAT REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS BE HEARD BEFORE NEW BUSINESS C. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS, AND AWARDS NONE D. NEW BUSINESS 1. Approval of early retirement plan for personnel in the Fire and Rescue Department, Sheriff's Department and Police Department. LBE SUBSTITUTE MOTION TO DEFER TO BUDGET PROCESS TO INCLUDE COSTS AND PERSONNEL INVOLVED AYES-LBE,HCN,RWR NAYS-SAM,BLJ ' O`~ pOAN ,`.~ ALL-AMERICA C j ~ ~ ~~~Yi~~~ ~a u~ as ~~g~8.9 SFSQUICENTENN~P 4 Beau~i~ulBcginning ROANORE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA JANUARY 23, 1990 Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meeting. Regular meetings are held on the second Tuesday and the fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public hearings are held at 7:00" p.m on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.) 1. Roll Call. 2. Invocation: John Chambliss Assistant County Administrator 3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag. B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS C. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS, AND AWARDS D. NEW BUSINESS 1. Approval of early retirement plan for personnel in the Fire and Rescue Department, Sheriff's Department and Police Department. 2. 1990 Roanoke Valley-Northern Virginia Economic Bridges Project. 3. Request for appropriation of funds for Police Department and authorization to begin implementation. 4. Approval of Public-Private Partnership Policy E. REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS 1. Request to establish dates for budget work sessions. F. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS G. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING FOR REZONING ORDINANCE - CONSENT AGENDA 1. An ordinance to amend the Future Land Use Map designation of a 53.44 acre tract from Development to Principal Industrial and to rezone said property from R-E to M-1 for industrial development, located east of West Ruritan Road and north of Homestead Lane, Hollins Magisterial District, upon the request of the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors. 2. An ordinance to amend the Future Land Use Map designation of a 24.09 acre tract from Rural Village to Principal Industrial, and to conditionally rezone said property from M-2 to M-3 to construct and operate an asphalt batch mix plant, generally located south of Buck Mountain Road and east of the Blue Ridge Parkway in the Cave Spring Magisterial District. 3. An ordinance to rezone approximately 35 acres from R-1 to B-2, generally located south of I-81 and west of Plantation Road in the Hollins Magisterial District upon the request of the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors. H. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance authorizing the payment of a monetary bonus for exceptional services rendered by Roanoke County employees. I. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance authorizing the execution of a lease of real estate, office space for the Roanoke County Department of Social Services located in the City of Salem. 2. Ordinance authorizing the acquisition of the Bridlewood Water system, the Falling Creek Water System and the Cherry Hill Water System and the transfer of the Falling Creek Water System to the Town of Vinton J. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS K. APPOINTMENTS 1. Community Corrections Resources Board 2. Grievance Panel 3. Health Department Board of Directors 4. Landfill Citizens Advisory Committee 5. Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission 6. Regional Partnership Site Advisory Committee 7. Status of the Court Service Unit Advisory Council/Youth and Family Services Advisory Board L. CONSENT AGENDA ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY. 1. Approval of Minutes.- May 23, 1989 2. Approval of Minutes - January 3, 1990 3. Confirmation of Committee Appointments to the Mental Health Services of the Roanoke Valley Community Services Board, Library Board and Transportation and Safety Commission. M. CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS N. REPORTS 1. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance 2. General Fund Unappropriated Balance 3. Board Contingency Fund 4. Statement of Expenditures and Income Analysis - December 31, 1989 5. Accounts Paid - December 1989 O. EXECUTIVE SESSION pursuant to the Code of Virginia Section 2.1-344 A (7) as requested by Roanoke County staff P. CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE SESSION EVENING SESSION (?:00 P.M.) Q. PUBLIC BEARING AND SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 190-1 Ordinance amending Chapter 8, "Erosion and Sediment Control", of the Roanoke County Code by amending Section 8-11 (a), "Control Measures Generally" to provide for the adoption of stormwater management criteria; and Resolution adopting a new section of the Design and Construction Standards Manual entitled "Stormwater Management Criteria."(CONTINUED FROM DECEMBER 19, 1989) 190-2 Petition of Fralin and Waldron, Inc. to amend proffered conditions on approximately 3.9 acres, to construct an office park in accordance with a concept plan dated March 28, 1988, located on the north side of Route 419 at the intersection of Chaparral Drive in the Cave Spring Magisterial District. 190-3 Petition of Aerospace Research Corporation to amend the Future Land Use Plan map designation of a 28.05 acre parcel from Rural Preserve to Development and to rezone a 22.5 acre parcel from M-2 to R-1 to develop a subdivision located off Route 939 in the Vinton Magisterial District. 190-4 Petition of Brambleton Storage Corporation to amend the proffered conditions on a 1.01 acre tract in accordance with a concept plan dated November 10, 1989 and to conditionally rezone a 1.016 acre tract from B-2 to M-1 to construct mini-warehouses located behind 3707 and 3655 Brambleton Avenue in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District. 190-5 Petition of Professional Services Industries to conditionally rezone a .68 acre tract from B-2 to M-1 to permit storage and fabrication of metal products, located at 4920 Cove Road in the Catawba Magisterial District. 190-6 Petition of Roanoke County Board of Supervisors to amend the Future Land Use Plan map designation of approximately 105 acres from Development to Principal Industrial and to rezone said property from R-E to M-1 for industrial development located between Route 11/460 and Carson Road in the Hollins Magisterial District.(PETITIONER HAS REQUESTED A CONTINUANCE TO FEBRUARY 27, 1990.) R. PUBLIC HEARINGS 190-7 Public Hearing to elicit written or oral comments for items to be included in the budctet for 1990-91 fiscal year. 190-8 Public Hearing for written or oral comment concerning the Establishment of the Six-Year Construction Plan for the secondary system of the State Highways for Fiscal Year 1990-1996. 190-9 Public Hearing and approval of resolution supporting the designation of property of Roanoke Rebos Inc as exempt from taxation by the General Assembly of Virginia. 190-10 Public Hearing for citizen comment for the Treasurer to issue up to $9 million Revenue Anticipation Notes for cash flow purposes and the adoption of a resolution approving the borrowing. 190-11 Petition of Frank and Marv E. Radford to appeal the Zoning Administrator's interpretation of proffers pertaining to the signage on two parcels: a. one located at the northeasterly corner of Peters Creek Road and Woodhaven Drive, Hollins Magisterial District. b. one located at the northeast corner of Glen Heather Drive and Route 419, Windsor Hills Magisterial District. S. CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS T . ADJOURNMENT ACTION # ITEM NUMBER AT A RERG NIA HELDNAT THEHROANOKE COUNTYEADMINISTRATION CENTER COUNTY, VI MEETING DATE: January 23, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: Approval of early retirement plan for perSheriff's the Fire and Rescue Department, Department, and Police Department COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR' S COOMMENTS : _~~-,-,.,,, ~ d '~~`~ 1~~'1'Cx-e/' t+-~l.`..c-u/1 ~~, i C l,iG„^~t\, i( , ,~tvc..u-vn-,~-v) tiy+.-c~ C~.~/'d~,,.~,~ ~~ J~' SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: House Bill No. 1477 was General Assembly and pertains enforcement officers and fire retire at age 55 with 30 ye benefits. Under House Bill Nc be eligible to retire at ag~ unreduced benefits. passed in the 1989 Session of the to retirement benefits for local law fighters. Currently, employees may ars of service with unreduced VSRS . 1477, those employees covered will 50 with 25 years of service with Barring any action by the Board of Supervisors, the eligible employees would automatically fall under the new plan. However, it is my feeling this is an item on which the Board should take specific ared recommending athat a the add tionalea ompensation hbe been prep provided for our eligible employees. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is requested that the Board approve the attached resolution. SUBMITTED BY: Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ~-/ Approved Denied Received Referred to ACTION Motion by: VOTE No Yes Abs Eddy Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers ~-l AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JANUARY 23, 1990 Resolution Authorizing Additional Retirement Benefits for Eligible Local Law Enforcement Officers and Full-Time Fire Fighters in Accordance with Acts of Assembly 1989, Chapter 484 WHEREAS, it has been the practice of Roanoke County to provide benefits equivalent to the State Police Officers Retirement System for its law enforcement and full-time fire fighters; and WHEREAS, it is the desire of Roanoke County to demonstrate its support for those employed in public safety; and WHEREAS, House Bill No. 1477 was passed in the 1989 Session of the General Assembly of Virginia pertaining to retirement benefits for local law enforcement officers and fire fighters; and WHEREAS, this bill states that an employer may, by resolution legally adopted and approved by the Virginia Supplemental Retirement System Board, elect to provide benefits equivalent to those provided for state police officers of the Department of State Police for any such employees who are employed in law enforcement positions comparably hazardous to that of a state police officer, including any sworn law enforcement officer who has the duty and obligation to enforce the penal, traffic, and highway laws of this Commonwealth as directed by his superior officer, if so certified by his appointing authority, or in positions as full-time salaried fire fighters; ~'~ BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, that the Board hereby elects to provide additional retirement benefits for eligible local law enforcement officers and full-time fire fighters in accordance with House Bill No. 1477 on and after July 1, 1990, and requests the Virginia Supplemental Retirement System Board approve said amendment to the retirement benefits for the County; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a certified copy of this Resolution be forwarded to the Virginia Supplemental Retirement System Board. A-12390-2 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. ~ ° ~ AT A RGIN AR HELDTAT THE ROANOKER OUNTY ADMINISOTRATION OENOER COUNTY, VI , MEETING DATE: January 23, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: Request for funds for Police Department transition and for implementation authority for the County Administrator. BACKGROUND' The steps needed to ensure law enforcement responsibilities Police Department will require July 1, 1990, the effective implementation. an orderly transition of County from the Sheriff's Office to the an expenditure of funds prior to date of the Police Department SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: As you know, a nationwide search is being conducted to identify and hire a Police Chief and have him in place by May 1, 1990. It is our desire to effect a full transition to the new department two months later on July 1, 1990. Funds will be required for recruiting expenses, for two months salary, and the furnishing of an office for the Chief. Also, State law prohibiting the use of our current color scheme for uniforms and vehicles in a police department will require the re-painting and re-striping of all marked vehicles and the purchas~tsf business ocards ndand cletterheadslwillddneed nto abe forms, repo , ordered for the Police Department. Some of this cost can be offse because it will reduce the need for these items in future Sheriff's Department budgets. An Employee Advisory Team has been established to assist in the transition process in the following ways: 1. Act as a channel to receive and forward questions from employees. 2. Generate and receive ideas to maximize the effectiveness of the new department. 3. Provide input for budget consideration. 4. Provide input on personnel policies. 5. Provide input on uniforms, car markings, badges, etc. ~~ The committee feels a great deal of ownership in this process and in the new department and has been very enthusiastic in carrying out the assigned tasks. The selection of uniform style, color and accessories was by vote of the employees of the Uniform, Criminal Investigation and Youth and Family Services Divisions. These divisions will make up the new Police Department. On display for your review today are their choices. Summarized below are estimated expenses for the transition: Uniforms $ 78,000 Paint/Stripe 46 marked vehicles 32,200 Chief's Salary/benefits (two months) 10,000 Stationery 13,000 Word Processor 3,000 1,500 Furniture Recruiting costs, moving expenses, etc. 10,000 Assessment Center (6-10 individuals) 1- Total $157,700 cc: RECOMMENDATION• It is requested that the Board appropriate $157,700 to cover transition and implementation expenses for the Roanoke County Police Department and that the County Administrator be authorized to implement the Police Department effective July 1, 1990, or prior to that time, if necessary. It is further requested that the County Administrator be authorized to work with the Sheriff of Roanoke County to allocate personnel, funds and equipment for the purpose of staffing and outfitting the Police Force. SUBMITTED BY: ~2 Elmer C. Hodg County Administrator ------------------------------ ACTION VOTE Approved (x ) Motion by: Bob L. Johnson to No Yes Abs Denied ( ) approve staff recommendation Eddy x Johnson x Received ( ) McGraw x Referred Nickens ~_ to Robers ~_ File Don Myers, Assistant County Adm. Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance Reta Busher, Director, Management & Budget Keith Cook, Director, Human Resources Sheriff Michael Kavanaugh ACTION N0. A-123-y9~0-3 Item No. ~°~i AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER IN ROANOKE, VA ON TUESDAY, MEETING DATE: January 23, 1990 SUBJECT: 1990 Roanoke Valley Bridges Project - Northern Virginia Economic COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND: There have been ongoing economic development contacts between the Roanoke Valley and Northern Virginia since 1986. During September 1988, a delegation of business and community leaders traveled to Fairfax County to make a presentation on the labor, quality of life and locational advantages of the Roanoke Valley. This delegation was followed by four (4) marketing trips by Roanoke County, Roanoke City and New River Valley economic developers. The President of George Mason University and his key staff members visited the Roanoke Valley in the summer of 1989 and announced that Dewberry and Davis was locating a branch office in Valleypointe. Several 1989 marketing trips from the Roanoke Valley concluded that Northern Virginia companies were seeking procurement contacts and subcontracting opportunities to support contracts and projects with the Federal Government. A Roanoke Valley "high tech" industry and services marketing book was prepared from company literature to present the capabilities of local companies. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: A marketing trip on January 15-16, 1990 to meet with representatives of George Mason University and Fairfax County Economic Development Authority concluded that a high profile 1990 "economic bridges" project was necessary to capitalize on previous successes and continue momentum. A proposed visit of Northern Virginia high tech companies to the Roanoke Valley was discussed. However, constraints of travel and budgeting would limit the size of the delegation and the duration of their visit. .~-z A more cost effective recommendation is to have George Mason University sponsor a day and one half Roanoke Valley technology fair in Northern Virginia. This would allow local companies to display their high tech products, supplies and services to a multitude of Washington Metro companies. It would create a better exposure for the Roanoke Valley by presenting a unified program with diverse high tech companies. The program would include short technical seminars, presentations on the Valley and industry tours of Northern Virginia companies. FISCAL IMPACT: A program and budget will have to be prepared for this project. RECOMMENDATION: The staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors: 1. Request the Regional Partnership to be the central Roanoke Valley contact for the implementation of the "First Roanoke Valley Technology Fair" to be held in the Fall of 1990. 2. Contact area businesses to ascertain their interest in participating. 3 Provide staff resources from the County Economic Development Department to support the Partnership in this project for marketing and planning the technology fair. SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED: l~L/ o -~~ ~~~ Timothy W. Gubala, Director Elmer C. Hodge, Jr., Economic Development County Administrator -------------- ----------------------- ACTION No Yes Abs X Approved (X ) Mot P n b~ : Lee B . Eddy_~, tionJE-ohnson X Denied ( ) to a pro e Received ( ) McGraw x Referred Nickens x to Robers X cc: File Timothy W. Gubala, Director, Economic Development .~ W ~°' •~ ~> ~~ m ~N V o 3 ~ Z~ O ~' ~ Z •~ c~ O v -a W ^ m .~ v c~ c .c ~ H m c ~' 3 ro °c row. 'a of d `° y~ ° N m~ c .c o n b o a> E E o~ v T~ E~ m ~, •~ d U m Y C ° O ~ O ... ~' ~ -OG O ~ N V ~ ~ ~ c(f X O N 6s O O= O O~ O~ N= ~ N ~ E ~~~ a.~ ~ E E~ m~ L o c m o ~UUOU ~'°- ° ~cn o o co o,b ~ f0 ~ (C cn C GJ ~ ~ C C f0 .U 7 O U ~ O N C O y y y pp G7 O C [ ~ O E Q .C ~O) i6 .L-. E ~ .L.- U d ~ C ca N C aD O N d> .~ Z O O O Z i O 7 U p ~ U~ U y ~ N > N ~ N N W ~~ ~ w O N ~ N ~ U C o ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~E •E o a> > o a c a`~ _ (6 O C O H O cn C C~ f0 C C C O > (d O O O ~ d L 01 0_ d 00 L W Q ~ A N N .-• U O 'w O O O ~ N~ fC -O ~ ~ L U y ~ .O O O >+ C O y 69 ,C N ._ ~ f6 ~ 0 y N ~ O G d _ O C d 01 U' d N _T N N Of N L >i ~ C [C (d a lL N ~ _ _ L is E'~~ ~>UQO> no ~m yam (6 ~ V] .C N N fA ~ fC N ~ y ~ O y [d ? '~ U~ L E i ~ ~ d 7 ~ (;) y N ~„~ E v o ca ~ p ~ ~ O N~ y f0 N U to c c o r E L w v O_ tO f0 fn fd ai U C F ~ O C O O ~ O L t0 - O 't a vi > C 't m~ ~~ U d v N -O Y O p _~ a N C +`e„ ~ ~ O 3 •d fC ~U O N c6 a w O O _ tt~~ to ~ W ~~ O C C .OJ m O d y =p d fC .0 N y 'D ~ cd U N J U U .~"-~ V c E~ ~v N N ~ t0 N > L N C U~ O ~ d ~'Q ~ O l17 to ~ U ~ d ~ N ~ ~acj v, ~ ~a~ W° <o E Q y xx~ U ~ N C1 td O ~ y a ~ °y dO Q ~ cd C7 LL v ~ y U 01 0) N N cC O T O 'C ~~ O ~ r N C C L C O ~C Y OO y O ~ C ~ N ~ E " ~ o O) m C N e i c O y u N U~ C a 0 0 _T N d .> o N W T >. c o ~~ i F- m °~ ~ N ~ ~c 0 3 .- ~` m ~ o_ 3 0. a c E v c e N O O ~ .C U L O N p> > d~ YO U m V OJ O O fC O C/~ ~ 7 O N Cn -O C ~ C U ~ ~~~ oa °''Ez~c ~ ~ oz `° c E > ~ 4J a0+ ~ 47 '~ d O U `O ~ C d O 2 C o, ~, >, L Y _ ~ ~ E E o - ~ ~ 3 a m d E O O CI L L 7 Q °y U C r 2 Y~ tCC w Z O C O` a d !A N C7 O C d U C E O N D1 y 0 t6 y L C ern ° `-' L ro` .E ° 3 a ~ a~i U .~ m +-° v ca is .E U GI F-' d O .~ b~~A ~~ NO POSTAGE NECESSARY IF MAILED IN THE UNITED STATES ~, ':, ~ L~ ~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY VIRGINIA, HELD ATTUESDAOY~JANUARYN23~AD990ISTRp,TION CENTER, ORDINANCE NO. 12390-1 AMENDING AND REENACTING THE 1989-90 APPROPRIATION ORDINANCE BY TRANSFERRING CAPITAL OUTLAY FUNDS FOR EMERGENCY RESPONSE VEHICLES AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, approved the annual budget for Roanoke County for fiscal year 1989- 90, after public hearing and first and second readings of the ordinance on June 14, 1989, pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter; and WHEREAS, the capital outlay portion of this budget provides for the sum of $189,934 to be expended for emergency response vehicles and associated equipment for the Roanoke County Sheriff's Department; and WHEREAS, the voters of Roanoke County by referendum conducted on November 7, 1989, approved the creation of a County Police Force pursuant to Section 15.1-131.6:1 and the County has requested legislation from the General Assembly to authorize the creation and funding of such police force not later than July 1, 1990; and WHEREAS, it is the intention of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, to insure that the sum of $189,934 be expended for emergency response vehicles and associated equipment to serve the law enforcement needs of the citizens of Roanoke County. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That Ordinance No. 61489-9 appropriating funds for the 1989-90 fiscal year budget for Roanoke County, Virginia, is amended and reenacted as follows: ~ } Funds related to the purchase of emergency response vehicles and associated equipment are being transferred from the Sheriff's Department and reappropriated to a new department for the Police Department. These funds, as stated in the original budget ordinance, are being transferred as follows: Policing and Investigation Capital (Sheriff's Department) Uniform Division ($171,967) Criminal Investigation Division ( 8,984) Services Division ( 8,983) Police Department Uniform Division $171,967 Criminal Investigation Division 8,984 Services Division 8,983 2. That an emergency exists therefore the second reading of this ordinance has been dispensed with by the affirmative vote of four-fifths of the members of the Board. The effective date of this ordinance shall be January 23, 1990. On motion of Supervisor Nickens and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None. A copy - testes J~'` Mary H. Allen, Clerk cc: File Sheriff Michael Kavanaugh Don C. Myers, Assistant County Administrator Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance Reta Busher, Director, Management & Budget Jack Council, Director, Procurement AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, JANUARY 23, 1990 ORDINANCE NO. 12390-1 AMENDING AND REENACTING THE 1989-90 APPROPRIATION ORDINANCE BY TRANSFERRING CAPITAL OUTLAY FUNDS FOR EMERGENCY RESPONSE VEHICLES AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, approved the annual budget for Roanoke County for fiscal year 1989- 90, after public hearing and first and second readings of the ordinance on June 14, 1989, pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter; and WHEREAS, the capital outlay portion of this budget provides for the sum of $189,934 to be expended for emergency response vehicles and associated equipment for the Roanoke County Sheriff's Department; and WHEREAS, the voters of Roanoke County by referendum conducted on November 7, 1989, approved the creation of a County Police Force pursuant to Section 15.1-131.6:1 and the County has requested legislation from the General Assembly to authorize the creation and funding of such police force not later than July 1, 1990; and WHEREAS, it is the intention of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, to insure that the sum of $189,934 be expended for emergency response vehicles and associated equipment to serve the law enforcement needs of the citizens of Roanoke County. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That Ordinance No. 61489-9 appropriating funds for the 1989-90 fiscal year budget for Roanoke County, Virginia, is amended and reenacted as follows: Funds related to the purchase of emergency response vehicles and associated equipment are being transferred from the Sheriff's Department and reappropriated to a new department for the Police Department. These funds, as stated in the original budget ordinance, are being transferred as follows: Capital Policing and Investigation (Sheriff's Department) Uniform Division ($171,967) 8,984) Criminal Investigation Division ~ g,983) Services Division Police Department Uniform Division $171,967 8,984 Criminal Investigation Division 8,983 Services Division 2. That an emergency exists therefore the second reading of this ordinance has been dispensed with by the affirmative vote of four-fifths of the members of the Board. The effective date of this ordinance shall be January 23, 1990. On motion of Supervisor Nickens and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None. A copy - testes Mary H. Allen, Clerk AT A REGULAR MEETING OF ETHRE ABNOO~D COUNTY A MINISTRATION C LATER ~ NTY VIRGINIA, HELD AT TH TUESDAY, JANUARY 23, 1990 ORDINANCE AMENDING AND REENACTING THE 1989-90 APPROPLI OUTLAY FUNDS~FOR EMERGENCY NRESPONSE CAPITA VEHICLES AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, approved the annual budget for Roanoke County for fiscal year 1989- 90, after public hearing and first and second readings of the ordinance on June 14, 1989, pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter; and WHEREAS, the capital outlay portion of this budget provides for the sum of $189,934 to be expended for emergency response vehicles and associated equipment for the Roanoke County Sheriff's Department; and WHEREAS, the voters of Roanoke County by referendum conducted on November 7, 1989, approved the creation of a County Police Force pursuant to Section 15.1-131.6:1 and the County has requested legislation from the General Assembly to authorize the creation and funding of such police force not later than July 1, 1990; and WHEREAS, it is the intention of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, to insure that the sum of $189,934 be expended for emergency response vehicles and associated equipment to serve the law enforcement needs of the citizens of Roanoke County. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That Ordinance No. 61489-9 appropriating funds for the 1989-90 fiscal year budget for Roanoke County, Virginia, is amended and reenacted as follows: Funds related to the purchase of emergency response vehicles and associated equipment are being transferred from the Sheriff's Department and reappropriated to a new department for the Police Department. These funds, as stated in the original budget ordinance, are being transferred as follows: Policing and Investigation Capital (Sheriff's Department) Uniform Division ($171,967) Criminal Investigation Division ( 8,984) Services Division ( 8'983) Police Department Uniform Division $171,967 Criminal Investigation Division 8,984 Services Division 8'983 2. That an emergency exists therefore the second reading of this ordinance has been dispensed with by the affirmative vote of four-fifths of the members of the Board. The effective date of this ordinance shall be January 23, 1990, and Item No . ~ '" L f AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER IN ROANOKE, VA ON TUESDAY, MEETING DATE: January 23, 1990 SUBJECT: Public-Private Partnership Policy COUNTY ADMINISTRATORS COMMENTS: ~'- SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: A Public-Private Partnership Policy is proposed to allow full or partial county funding of public site development costs for roads, grading, water and sewer and/or off-site facility fees for water and sewer. For a qualifying industry that is manufacturing, processing or assembling or a major employer initially employing 250 full-time jobs. The specific policy as attached considers the mechanism for determining a payback formula as well as suggested areas where the County may participate. BACKGROUND: Despite declining federal assistance for local economic development, a changing U.S. economy and increasing infrastructure challenges, local governments are continually being requested to award incentives to attract new businesses. Nationally, many of these incentives are tax related, however, Roanoke County cannot offer tax incentives to potential industries. While Roanoke County cannot offer tax incentives, the County has been involved in several public-private partnerships since 1986. The first such project, Southwest Industrial Park (SWIP) projected a seven year payback. In 1993, the County will have surpassed the original investment of $193,000. Today, SWIP has six employers with a total of 100 employees, generating an estimated $36,000 annually for the County. In 1988, the County agreed to participate with the Lingerfelt Development Corporation to jointly develop the 250 acre Valleypointe project. Presently, five companies with 125 employees have located there. Two new buildings are planned and/or under construction. Finally, the Roanoke-Botetourt Industrial Park in Bonsack has sold three large tracts to Tweeds, Arkay Packaging and David Hale. Ultimately, over 650,000 square feet of industrial space will be developed on this site. To assist in developing this site the County pledged $182,025 for both on and off-site development. The payback is projected to be four years. FISCAL IMPACT: Funds for the Public-Private Partnership can come from the existing Economic Development Fund or from the Utility Fund (for water/ sewer). An annual appropriation of funds would have to be made during the budget process. Staff proposes that the General Fund refund the Utility Fund from taxes that are generated during the first tax year after a company begins operation. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the Public-Private Partnership Policy with the understanding that specific requests for public-private partnerships be forwarded to the Board of Supervisors for their consideration of approval. SUBMITTED BY: l~~w~ Timothy W. Gubala, Director Economic Development Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to APPROVED: ~'~~ ~'` Elmer C. Hodg , Jr., County Administrator ACTION Motion by: No Yes Abs Eddy Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers Attachment Limitations: Roanoke County will not pay for any private sewage pre treatment facilities or waive any ordinances requiring fire protection or industrial discharge certification. Funding sources: Roanoke County shall fund its participation from the General Fund from anticipated tax revenue, or from an Economic Development Fund or other special non-utility funds. There is an intent to continue the maintenance of a fiscally sound utility enterprise fund to provide water and sewer service to County utility custsmamended b 1 Ordinance 8 12 86-16912 Se tiono 3bt ) Code Chapter 22 a Y Agreement: A written agreement on a form provided by the County Attorney may be required to specify terms of the Public-Private Partnership. 2 '~~- ROANORE COUNTY PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP POLICY ma fund all or part of site development Purpose: Roanoke County Y costs, roads, utility connection and/or off site facility fees or alifying industry that is manufacturing, water and sewer for a ~ a roduct, or a major employer initially processing or assembling p employing 250 full time jobs. A qualifying industry may apply for County Determination: a letter to the Director of Economic assistance by addressing Development that indicates: a. b. manufacturing, processing, or assembly to be conducted on the site total capital invest and antic pated personal~propeatYg) machinery and tools c, total employment and annual payroll d, specific water and sewer needs (i.e., size line and/or capacity) e, date of construction and/or start-up (if in an existing building). f, if applicable, the terms of any lease to insu~he hperiod company will occupy the building during calculated for payback. The Director, upon consultation with the County Adarticirationato other County staff, will review the requ fund ng.p The County may determine the extent of Roanoke County either partially or fully fund participation in the project. If after calculation of anticipated ayback Twill soccur withi erthree tools and personal proper y), P years, the County may fully fund connection fees for the project. If payback is between three and five years, the County's participation shall be limosts wi110be usedrosA recommendationafor company taxes and public c participation shall be forwarded to the Board of Supervisors for their consideration of approval. Areas of Assistance: If approved, Roanoke County may fund all, or part of, utility connection and off site availabilityine otherron qualifying industry as well as consider participating site costs (i.e. grading). Off-site fees of jointly developed parks shall not be held as a portion of the total cost of the project and thus not a portion of the payback equation. Such assistance shall be funded after the approval of the required site plan and at the time a building permit is issued for the project. 1 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. t-3 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: January 23, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: Requests for Public Hearing and First Reading for Rezoning Ordinances Consent Agenda COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND' The first reading on these ordinances is accomplished by adoption of these ordinances in the manner of consent agenda items. The adoption of these items does not imply approval of the substantive content of the requested zoning actions, rather approval satisfies the procedural requirements of the County Charter and schedules the required public hearing and second reading of these ordinances. The second reading and public hearing on these ordinances is scheduled for February 27, 1990. The titles of these ordinances are as follows: 1. An ordinance to amend the Future Land Use Map designation of a 53.44 acre tract from Development to Principal Industrial, and to rezone said property from R-E to M- 1 for industrial development, located east of West Ruritan Rd. and north of Homestead Lane, Hollins Magisterial District, upon the request of the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors. 2. An ordinance to amend the Future Land Use Map designation of a 24.09 acre tract from Rural Village to Principal Industrial, and to conditionally rezone said property from M-2 to M-3 to construct and operate an asphalt batch mix plant, generally located south of buck mountain Rd., and east of the Blue Ridge Parkway, in the Cave Spring Magisterial District. 3. An ordinance to rezone approximately 35 acres from R-1 to B-2, generally located south of I-81 and west of Plantation Rd. in the Hollins Magisterial district, upon the request of the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors. ~ /-.3 2 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends as follows: (1) That the Board approve and adopt the first reading of these rezoning ordinances for the purpose of scheduling the second reading and public hearing for February 27, 1990 . (2) That this section of the agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth as Items 1 through 3, inclusive, and that the Clerk is authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this action. Respectfully submitted, d~1 ~ ~1.~~-~- Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney Action Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by Eddy Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers Vote No Yes Abs C-/ ,,_ j[ u~ OCt ~0 19~ ROANORE CONY RgZONING APPyICATIO~N'~ ~ 6R~ ~UUt~t~ Y Date Rea.: Received By: Case No.: Ord. No.: gralin & ~daldron 1 Owner's Name: Phone: 774-4415 • P,O. Box 4175, Roanoke, VA 24015 Address : Phone:772-2005 Roanoke County Board of Supervisors 2. Applicant's Name: Address: p'0• Box 29800, Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 k'est Ruritan Road adjacent to Roanoke Centre for g ~ Location of Property: n us ry an ec no ogy Tax Map Number(s) : 39.20-1.50, 52 4. Magisterial District: Hollins 5. Size of Property: 6. Existing Zoning: Existing Land Use: ~. proposed Zoning: 53.44 acres Residential Estate RE Vacant agricultural Industrial District M-1 Industrial Development Proposed Land Use: Dove loprient g. Comprehensive Plan Designation: x No 9. Are Conditions Proffered With This Request? Yes of our 8pplica- (If you are voluntarily offering proffers A mew of the Planning tiara, these p stf ou in the p='ep~'$ iongof these proffers.) g~f caa assi Y Pro osed) Buildings: 10. Value of Land and ( p lication. Please il. The Following Items Kust Be Submitted With This App Of These Check If Enclosed. Application Will Not Be Accepted If Any Items Are Kissing Or Incomplete: lication Concept Plan z Letter of App x List of Adjacent Owners ,~ Metes and Bounds Description x Vicinity Map of property (Attach Exhibit A) x Written Proffers - Application Fee lication (If Applicable) '-° =~ mater and Sewer App ature Of Property Owner, Contract Purchaser, 12. Sign , Or Owner's Agen ~ Date 10 / 19 / 89 g ignature ~~ ~~ ~~~ DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT M E M O R A N D II M TO; Terry Barrington, Director, Planning and Zoning Gubal~lrector, Economic Development FROM: Timothy DATE: October 19, 1989 SIIgJECT: Rezoning application - Fralin & Waldron, Inc. property On behalf of the Board of Supe roximat ly a53.44~ acres gfrom application for the rezoning of app _~This property Residential Estates RE to Industrial District M-1. otential is one of several evaluated as part of tth BoardtofySupervisors. industrial sites that was initiated by Please note that the Coneetherea is nnot aaeuserd for the propertyn are not included becaus Rezoning of the property must precede the detailed site planning. Several proffered conditions are listed that affect permitted uses, access to the property and restrictive covenants. Suggested proffers: 1. The property will not include permitted uses for: a, Automobile painting, uphlstering, repairing, rebuilding, reconditioning, body and fender work, truck repairing or overhauling; b. Manufacturing of pottery and figurines or other similar ceramic products; c, Veterinary hospital and commercial kennels with exterior runs and yards; d. Flea markets, unless. a special exception has been granted by the Board of Supervisors. e. Seed and feed stores. Please advise me with your comments and questions. ~ Thank you. P.O. BOX 29800 • ROANOKE .VIRGINIA 24018-0798 • (703) 772-2069 FAX. NO.: (703) 772-2030 A Bu,wti~.iBcginning ~ -/ ~~~t~~~~ ~~ ~~ C~~~ DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT M g M O R A N D O M TO: FROM: DATE: SIIHJSCT: Terry Harrington, irector, Timothy W. Gubala Director, October 20, 1989 Planning and Zoning Economic Development Land Use Plan Amendment for Fralin and Waldron property on West Ruritan Road Background: This property was purchased by Fralin and Waldron in 1982 from the Pollard Estate. Roanoke County Economic Development staff evaluated this site as being a potential industrial site and recommended that the B o ert f sou thatl it could behusedmforhf ture Plan and rezone the p p Y industrial development. The proposed industrial amendment can be complunentary v adjacent residential. The AMP rezoning on Old Hollins Road serves as a Roanoke County moserecommendedlpriordto developmentsidential uses. A master plan i Reasons for the Amendment: The Roanoke Valley i ct velcindustriale cl ients o from u out ide lthe to offer to prospe _ Commonwealth. Th ct on to encourage r industrial tsite developaaent 90 is to take a through changes in land use and zoning, water and sewer extens ons the proposed in us adjacent residential uses. ith The Roanoke Centre for Industry and Technology is an adjacent lan use to the southwest and large lot residential uses are located to northwest and southe Wet Ruritan Road entBufferingaandlscreening the northeast along will be required to protect the proposed industrial use from adjacent residential areas. Types of uses should be limited under ' d trial zoning to enhance compatibility with Re ested Land Use Plan Amendment: A Plan Amendment from Development to Principal Industrial is requested. Effect of the Amendment on Surroundin Pro erties d P.O. BOX 29600 • ROANOKE . VIRGINIA 24018-0796 • (703) 772-2069 FAX. NO.: (703) 772-2030 A Brwwti~iJBe~inning ~-i and long range highway planning. Opportunities for public-private partnerships exist to implement site development by the private sector. Specifically, this site is adjacent to the Centre for Industry and Technology which is not identified in Roanke City's comprehensive Plan. This land is zoned LM under the Roanoke City Zoning Ordinance. It is the intent of the Economic Development staff to affect an extension of a road from the industrial park into the County. Access will come from Roanoke City. justification for the Amendment: Existinct Land Use Pattern - Industrial development in the City's Centre for Industry and Technology and residential in Roanoke County. Existinct Zoninct - Currently residential in area. This property and several other sites in the area is proposed to be part of a new East County industrial area adjacent to the Route 11/460 Corridor. Potential Industrial Site - Identified as a site in the original 1981 site inventory and reconsidered in the 1989 update requested by the Board of Supervisors. Employment center - This property is adjacent to such a center in the City of Roanoke's Centre for Industry and Technology. Tovoctraphy - Land is within the 10$ slope criteria land use determinant. Flood Hazard - Outside floodplain area. Water supply - 12" water service adjacent to site in West Ruritan Road. Sewer service - 12" sewer service extends through site to West Ruritan Road. Access - Access is proposed to be through Roanoke Center for Industry and Technology behind Orvis. Transportation Center - Close to Route 11/460 Corridor. Urban sector - Within Urban Service Sector. .• ~ ~ ~ •~ ~o- '•`~ QVO/ i ~ 1~ ~ ~~, / tl !~..~ ti ~~ ;> ••. ....~ ~ ~~ ._ ~, `` ~. ~; ~' ~ i ~~o ' ~ M I .,~ Zoning: ~ Comprehensive Plan Designation: Development Access: West Ruritan Road Water: On site Sewer: On site Availability: Owners will make property available for industrial use. Recommendation: Amend Comprehensive Plan to Principal Industrial. Rezone property to M1. Fiscal Impact; 1990 -- -- - - - Department of Economic Development e name: Fral n Size: 53.44 acres ,~. e Rec . ~~~~~~l ~ 1~:` ~O ~ Received By: O~~ Case No.: ~ o.. _ ~o ~~ ~ ti's ROANORE COUNTY REZONING APPLICATION ~ .M... ~_, .. . T„~ Phone: 774-4475. 1. Owner's Name: V____irQ_ ~°^ hlt Pavina,~nmr~„~ . Address: P 0 Box 8395 Roanoke, Virgin'a 2401 Phone: 2. Applicant's Name: Same as above - Address: F,79 (Rnrk Mtn, Rd.) 3. Location of Property: 24 090 Acres of a Va SPC RrP 98 0~ 2 2~., 98 O1 2 26 gR ni ?~ QR n1-~-~R Tax Map Number(s). 4. Magisterial District: Cave Spring Magisterial District 24.090 Acres 5. Size of Property: 6. Existing Zoning: M-2 General Industrial District Existing Land Uses= proposed Zoning: M-3 Special Industrial District Proposed Land Use: Rural 8. Comprehensive Plan Designation: Rural Villa a Sector 9. Are Conditions Proffered With This Request? Yes No X (If you are voluntarily offering proffers as a part of your applica- tion, these proffers in the a re ationgof hes ffers. ) Plying Staff can assist you p p~ 10. Value of Land and (Proposed) Buildings: Tax Map No. 98.01-2-25 - land - 11. The Following Items Must Be Submitted With Thi PApplicationOfPThese Check If Enclosed. Application Will Not Be Acce ted If Any Items Are Missing Or Incomplete: _~ Letter of Application X Concept Plan ~_ Metes and Bounds Description X List of Adjacent Owners of Property (Attach Exhibit A) Vicinity Map X Application Fee ~ Written Proffers X Water and Sewer Application (If Applicable) 12. Signature Of P erty Owner, Contract Purchaser, Or Owner's A Signature Date 0 roper 20, 19 9 . Mi 1 Pace, Jr. Gentry Locke Rakes ~ e * $54,300; building - $115,000; 98.01-2-26 - land - $24,500; 98.01-2-27 - land - $600; 98.01-2-28 - land - $1,800 ~_ z Attorneys at law 703.982.8000 GENTRY LC-CKE RAKES & MC3~RE October 20, 1989 10 Franklin Road, S.E. Post Ofice Box 1018 Telecoprtx 703.982.8524 Department of Planning and Zoning Roanoke County Administration Center Room 600 3738 Brambleton Avenue, SW P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, Virginia 24018-0798 Roanoke,Yrginia 24005 RE: Application for Rezoning by Virginia Asphalt Paving Company, Inc., of a 24.090 Acre Tract, off of Buck Mountain Road in Roanoke County, Virginia, from M-2 General Industrial District to M-3 Special Industrial District Dear Sirs: Virginia Asphalt Paving Company, Inc., hereby requests that the property which is the subject of its application be rezoned from its current M-2 General Industrial District designation to M-3 Special Industrial District designation to enable it to construct and operate an asphalt batch mix plant thereon, as shown on the Concept Plan submitted herewith. THE APPLICANT Virginia Asphalt Paving Company, Inc. ("Virginia Asphalt") is a Virginia corporation in the business of manufacturing bituminous concrete or asphalt plant mix used in asphalt paving. It currently operates asphalt batch mix plants in Roanoke City under a lease with Rockydale Quarries Corp., which lease expires in 1995, and in Rocky Mount and Dublin, Virginia. Virginia Asphalt maintains its offices at its property located off of Buck Mountain Road (Virginia Secondary Route 679) in Roanoke County, and desires to construct a new asphalt batch mix plant thereon. Accordingly, Virginia Asphalt requests that the property be rezoned from M-2 General Industrial District to M-3 Special Industrial District. THE PROPERTY The property which is the subject of this application contains 24.090 acres, originally consisting of four parcels: ~, GENTRY LOCKE ~ -'2' RAKES & MOORE Department of Planning and Rezoning October 20, 1989 Page -2- 1. A 16.40 acre parcel (tax map number 98.01-2-25), acquired by deed dated May 5, 1978, from Norman T. Wright and Lois B. Wright, his wife, recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, in Deed Book 1091, Page 844; 2. Lot 41, subdivision of Thomas H. Beasley (tax map number 98.01-2-28), acquired by deed dated May 5, 1978, from Thomas H. Beasley, Jr., Trustee, of record in the aforesaid Clerk's Office in Deed Book 1091, Page 848; 3. A 7.00 acre parcel, more or less, and a 0.18 acre parcel (tax map numbers 98.01-2-26 and 98.01-2-27, respectively), acquired by deed dated March 12, 1980, from Thomas H. Beasley, Jr., Trustee, of record in the aforesaid Clerk's Office in Deed Book 1145, Page 312. Copies of the foregoing deeds are attached hereto as Exhibits A (1), (2), and (3). All of the parcels are hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Property." The Property is an irregular shaped parcel of partially cleared, mostly wooded, level to sloping ground ranging in elevation from 1300 feet to 1440 feet, more particularly described in a "Plat Showing Property of Virginia Asphalt Paving Company, Inc., a Virginia Corporation, Situated Along Buck Mountain Road (Virginia Secondary Route 679)" made by Lumsden Associates, P.C., dated October 16, 1989 (the "Concept Plan"), a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit B and made a part hereof. There exists at least a 50 foot buffer yard between the proposed location of the facility and adjoining properties bordered by large deciduous trees mixed with large and small evergreen trees and shrubs. The property is improved by a modular frame office building, containing 2,193 square feet, together with a 1,100 paved entrance road and paved parking lot. The property is also improved by a metal shop building containing 5,040 square feet and gravel parking lot, surrounded by a chain-link fence enclosing an area of approximately 1.5 acres. There are available on the property a total of 50 parking spaces. The property is not located in a HUD flood designated area. Available public utilities include electricity, water and telephone service. A septic tank-drain field sewage system serves the property. GENTRY LOCKE ~ _ Z RAKES & MODRE ~- Department of Planning and Rezoning October 20, 1989 Page -3- PREVIOUS REZONING By final order entered December 27, 1977, the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors granted the petition of Virginia Asphalt for rezoning of the aforesaid 16.40 acre parcel and Lot 41 of the Thomas H. Beasley subdivision from Agricultural District A-1 and Residential R-E District to M-2 General Industrial District, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit C, to allow the construction of an office building and shop facility. Similarly, by final order entered on July 22, 1980, the Board of Supervisors granted Virginia Asphalt's Petition for rezoning of the aforesaid 7.00 acre parcel from A-1 Agricultural District to M-2 General Industrial District in order to permit it to construct and operate an office building and shop facility for the carrying on of its business, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit D. Accordingly, all of the property which is the subject of this application is currently zoned M-2 General Industrial District. PROPOSED USE In the event the property is rezoned, the proposed facility will be constructed substantially as shown on the Concept Plan for the purpose of manufacturing bituminous concrete. The manufacture of bituminous concrete used in asphalt paving is accomplished by blending together various sizes of crushed aggregate and asphalt cement in a hot mix asphalt plant. An asphalt plant generally consists of several cold aggregate storage and feed bins, a conveyor system to deposit cold aggregate from the bins to a dryer, an aggregate dryer (which is heated by oil or natural gas) to remove moisture from the aggregate, a gradation control system, sometimes referred to as the plant, which separates and stores dried aggregate and feeds the requisite amount of aggregate into hot bins and then to a mixer where the hot aggregate is mixed with asphalt cement to make asphalt concrete. An asphalt batch mix plant also includes a dust collection and control system to minimize dust in the area. A diagram depicting these various components containing a description of their purpose is attached heretc as Exhibit ~: and made a part hereof. The gradation control system or plant is approximately 60 feet in height. The M-3 zoning regulations provide that building in an M-3 District may be erected up to a height of 45 feet. However, chimneys, flues, cooling towers, f lag poles, radio and GE~tTRY LOC~CE ~ _Z RAKES & MOORE Department of Planning and Rezoning October 20, 1989 Page -4- communication towers, or their accessory facilities not normally occupied by workmen are excluded. The zoning regulations also permit the construction of buildings over 45 feet in height with approval of the zoning administrator. As is demonstrated by the letter from F. C. Altizer, Jr., Resident Engineer, Virginia Department of Transportation, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit F, Buck Mountain Road (Virginia Secondary Route 679) is properly designed and constructed to handle the truck traffic generated by the proposed use of the property. Virginia Asphalt currently has approximately 15 dump trucks traveling to and from the property on a daily basis, which would increase to approximately 75 dump trucks a day based on 1988 plant production. In light of the fact that the location of the proposed facility is generally level, and because there will be no increase in the paved parking area on the property, there will be little or no increase in storm water runoff from the property onto adjacent properties. All asphalt plants owned by Virginia Asphalt are operated in accordance with federal and state environmental regulations, particularly regarding air quality and water protection standards. Virginia Asphalt will comply with the requirements of the Air Pollution Control Board and Water Control Board, as well as any and all other governmental regulations pertaining to the proposed facility. ADJOINING PROPERTIES A list of the owners of the properties adjoining the subject property are attached hereto as Exhibit G. The requested rezoning and proposed use of the property will not adversely affect adjoining properties, either aesthetically or in value. As previously stated, the property is already zoned M-~ General Industrial District, and is used as an office and shop facility. The property is entirely shielded from view of surrounding residences due to the topography and wooded nature of the property. The nearest residence to the north is approximately 850 feet from the proposed facility, and is at the 1400 foot elevation point, approximately 40 feet below the elevation of the proposed location of the plant. The nearest property to the south and west is owned by N&H Investment Co., DRAKES & NK~DRE ,~ ~~ Department of Planning and Rezoning October 20, 1989 Paqe -5- Inc., and is unimproved. The nearest residence to the east is approximately 970 feet from and approximately 45 feet below the proposed location of the facility. Accordingly, physical activity from the property will be imperceptible to those residences. COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT PLAN - LAND USE Virginia Asphalt has maintained its office and shop facility on the property since obtaining rezoning of the property to M-2 General Industrial District, prior to the adoption of the Roanoke County Comprehensive Development Plan (the "Comprehensive Plan") in 1985. However, rezoning of the property as requested will require an amendment to the Roanoke County Land Use Plan. The Comprehensive Plan, which contains the guidelines for future development in Roanoke County, provides that the property is within an area designated as "Rural Village". Rural Village is described as "a future land use area where limited development activity may occur", and "delineates rural communities at intermediate locations between the primary agricultural and forestal activities ... and the more intense residential and commercial development" areas (pp. 12,22). However, the Comprehensive Plan permits certain industries, such as mining and extraction activities, to be conducted in such areas (pp. 23-26). Additionally, the Comprehensive Plan recognizes the need for mixed land use principles and encourages mixed use development within zoning districts (p. 105). Further, the Comprehensive Plan recommends the adoption of a modified performance zoning ordinance establishing zoning districts to permit by right as many potentially compatible uses as possible (p. 11). Accordingly, the proposed use of the property is compatible with and complimentary to the current use and the Comprehensive Plan. SUMMARX Rezoning the property to permit the operation of an asphalt batch mix plant will allow Virginia Asphalt to put the property to its highest and best use and enable it to more efficiently operate its business. The activities to be conducted at the facility are less intensive than are the activities expressly `- permitted within a Rural Village area pursuant to the GENTRY LOCKE ~ _ Z, RAKES & NK~DRE Department of Planning and Rezoning October 20, 1989 Page -6- Comprehensive Plan. The proposed use is also consistent with the flexible principles upon which the Comprehensive Plan is based, and is in accordance with the orderly development and growth of the area. Additionally, the proposed facility will not adversely impact the surrounding community in terms of reduced property value or burden public roads or existing utilities. Accordingly, Virginia Asphalt Paving Company, Inc. respectfully requests that its application be acted upon favorably and that the Roanoke County Land Use Plan be amended to permit it to construct and operate an asphalt batch mix plant on the property. Resp tfully s c G. Mi ael Pac , Jr. GENTRY LOCKE GMP/lcc 200/08856-004/004.1tr \__- U z~a--,Z z a _ o a a p ` ~ O ~ ~ ~ U W U 1r ~~ U ~ ~ ~` ~ pp//~~ F~ N = f_y J • V ~ (J S ~ O `~ a < >; z ~ ~~ <S <'~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~r ~S S Waco ~o O O 4 i <O ~U ~ ~~ ~ ~ a < i ~o g C ~~ <o a ~~~~ ~ n ~ j Q m ~ ~ W d ~ ., z mar a+r ..~. ,,~ ~ ara~• ~ ~~~_ ~~~~r~M ~ TJ ,r ~af '~`/ ~~{_ f~' ~~~' .mil ~ ~ y~: ~~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ °' ~ a ~~ ~~ ~ `, '~~ ~~!1 ' ~ ~ i +. ~ a, S ! l~ ~ ~ ,s i ~ ~ EL ~ ~ ~ B~~ .t ~`~~ , ~~i~!- g~ t / !~ „ C .. '~`,,' " w \•' ~~i= ~ ~ II ~ ~~~ • 4 ~:! s .. .'_E , ~! \ ~ ....:~ ~ ~' ~.` s~~ ~ `' jss ~~7 ~~ 1~~~ f ~~ j{~; YN ~•~ ~. z ~ % .~ i~~ ~ `~ ~~` ~~~ ~ ~~ti ~ ~. z LO C^ z w i~1 ,~ ~ $ N w ie M g x O s pM s ~ .Ni C~ .., Q z ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ A ~ Qa ~ ~c ¢ t 4 N I s ~~ N ~s ~~ ai ~~ N ~° ,.E ~~ ~l s i ' ~~ ~~ i ~~ ~ ~t ~ ~ ~~ ~i _~~# ~;~~, ~~ S I ~~ ~~ ~~3 ~~~~ a ~~ ~3.. ~~3 F ~~ ~ ~~ 4 !~ ~~~ ~~~ ~ '~ ~z ~~ ~ t .. ~ M l j ~. l~ 0 t t~t ti s~ ~iij i~ ~~ ~j `~ i ~' l ~~ 3 ~f ~€ 1 ~_~ !~~ ~, #~ {~i Z ~#~ (~ ~ .. ! 1 ~_ _. ~ ~ ........`.... ,~~~_.~ .~i~ ia,~a• . av-~.-w -..cam • ~rJ.,> r rr Olr+-+ lk.l3ytUGG5c•1:ii ~ 10i17i89 16'27 1e783 774 6154 VA. ASPHALT PAV. ~ 002 t w F COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RAY D. rETHTEL 14 SOt1TH tiR0A0 6TAEET ~~~~ SAIdM, 24153 F. C. ALTIZEA, JR. AEf~DfNT iMGINfER October 6, 1909 Post nft i r.P liox 3071 Salem, Virclinia 24153 Mr. R. Q. Cunningham Virginia Asphalt Paving Co., Inc. P. 0. box 8395 Roanoke, VA 24014 re: koute 679 - lurk Mt. Rd. Itnannk+e Cf-nnt..y dear Mr. Cunningham: t As per your request, this will confirm our conversation relative to the adequacy of geometric standards of Route !~/y, Huck y~:~ntain Road. Buck Mountain Road has been constructed to a current standar~, which will be adequate to handle the increased traffic projected by your ousiness establish- ment. this highway is one of the few secondary roads in Southwest County which has been reconstructed to a higher standard. The alignment and grade is such that the increase in traffic from your proposed`ac:itity would be negligible in reyar~ds to the overall traffic flow. Certairify, Buck Mountain Road has become a major corridor for the Southwest County area. The next important facet of this road, which will receive significant review from this Department, 1s the intersection of Buck Mountain Road any P.oute 220. As you know, we have a small improvement project which will provior a right turn lane from southbound Route 220 onto Buck Mountain Road. This should help the traffic flow in that area. I trust that this watt provide information ulzaningful to your company. Si nr.Prpty, ~. F. C,. Attizer, 3r. ReSivent Engineer fCA/m~ TRANSPOA7ATION FAR TNC 9~cr r•c~~T..o.. ~~ ~~ r' ~ 4 ~ ~' uNriMa i ~' a •~° K ~~~ i9 ` VICINITY MAP .-~~ EL .wo N~1RTH . G-~- ~ ~ RE I V/RG/iv/A ASf'~AtT 7Av~~J~L~. COMMUNITY SBRVICBS M _,~ r•o M- 3 AND DBVRLOPMBNT 98.O/ _ oz - ,2 s, z 6, 2 7 ~ 28 ' ; _ ~,~. ' ~~ (~ ~ Date Rec . '~ s,.. ~, +~. e TM ,ii ` ~ _ ~..~ ~~ .^ Received By: k~ d ~= Case No.: GEC j `~ ~ ;~a Ord. No. ROANOKE COUNTY REZONING APPLI~-~~~~~;~ ~}3~}s,~; ~ ~'~ i~U~+i~~E C;~1?~Y 1. Owner's Name: Household of Faith c/o Donald Lopez, Trusteq~hOne: 345-4504 Address: P.O. Box 14142, Roanoke, VA 24038 2. Applicant's Name: Roanoke Co. Board of Supervisors phone: 772-2005 Address: P.O. Box 29800, Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 3. Location of Property: Fronting on I-81, adjacent to Exit 43 at Plantation Road Tax Map Number (s) : 18.18-1-1 4. Magisterial District: xollins 5. Size of Property: 35.04 6. Existing Zoning: Residential District R-1 Existing Land Use: Vacant agricultural 7. Proposed Zoning: B-2 General Commercial District Proposed Land Use: Commercial 8. Comprehensive Plan Designation: Principal Industrial 9. Are Conditions Proffered With This Request? Yes x No (If you are voluntarily offering proffers as apart of your applica- tion, these proffers must be in writing. A member of the Planning Staff can assist you in the preparation of these proffers.) 10. Value of Land and (Proposed) Buildings: Unknown il. The Following Items Must Be Submitted iTith This Application. Please Check If Enclosed. Application Will Not Be Accepted If Any Of These Items Are Missinq Or Incomplete: / Letter of Application Concept Plan / Metes and Bounds Description / List of Adjacent Owners of Property (Attach Exhibit A) / Vicinity Map Application Fee Written Proffers Water and Sewer Application (If Applicable) 12. Signature Of Property Owner, Contract Purchaser, Or Owner's Agent~~_ ` I) S i nature v" • Date 12 / 7 / 89 g C, -3 BEGINNING at a point on the southerly side of Interstate Highway Route M8', said point being the northerly corner of property of Interstate Motel Developers, Inc. (D. B. 961 page 124) and shown as corner 1; thence with the division line between propesty of Florence Marie Peters and Interstate Motel Developers, inc., S. 31' 09' 00" E. 1364.15 feet to a point, corner 2; thence S. 58' SO' 00" M. 100.44 feet to corner 4B; thence S. 30. 45' 00" N. 453.23 feet to corner 4A, at the northeast terminus of Carvin Street; thence with the same in part, and the northerly line of Lot 9, Sec. 3, walrond court lP. B. 2. page 178), S. 59' 40' 45" K. 551.20 feet to corner 5 on the easterly boundary of billy H. Branch; thence :+:!h same, and the easterly boundary of `:~rtn 8~rlington Heights lP. B. 3, page 57), ~, 36' 44' 23" w. 1750.93 feet to a fence post, corner 6; thence with the easterly boundary of Ellsworth L. Snyder and Bonnie E. Osborne Snyder (D. B. 1026, page 631) and Randglph Z. Howell and Gladys R. F:owell lD. B. 70, page 293), N. 37. 24' 00" w. 619.48 feet to an iron pin on the southerly side of Inter- state Highway Route /81; thence with a curved line to the right, whose radius is 4490.66 feet. and whose chord bearing and distance is S. 89. 34' S7" E. 3.36 feet, an arc distance of 3.36 feet to corner 8. another point on the southerly side of inter- state Highway Route M81; thence with the same S. 89' 33' 40" E. 1044.68 feet to corner 1, the place of BEGINNING, and deslq- nated as Tract I, containing 35.14 acres-, all as more fully shown on a. plat prepared by Buford T. Lumsden b Associates, P. C. , Engineers and Surveyors, dated July 31, 1985 entitled "Plat showing Tract I 135.14 Ac.), being conveyed to the Household of Faith by Florence Marie Peters, situated along south side of Interstate Highway Route Mel, Hollins Magisterial District, Roanoke County, Virginia"; and, BEING a part of the same property acquired by J. H. Peters, Jr. and Florence Mari Peters by deed from J. S. Jamison and Fannie A. Jamison, his wife, dated June 12, 1947, and recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of the County of Roanoke, Vir- ginia in Deed Book 373, .page 216, and sub- sequently conveyed by J. H. Peters, Jr. and Florence Marie Peters to "Florence MariR Peters and J. N. Peters, Jr., and/or the survivor as at common law as betweer. the grantees", said deed being dated July 26, 1952, and recorded in the aforesaed ~~~ k.'s Office in Deed Book ~? 7 _. pag • the said J. H. Peters, Jr. having since passed away, survived by the Grantor herein. R /' ~•' FiLTER ~~ ~ PLANT ~ iROtuns a~1~ or ~~ EXIT 43 ' ST4 F M005 . 0 L •- 43 ._ ... _._._.... 3 i ` Fp~ENJ`~ ~~. ~ Q, ~`, 't t URU ~ Gn~•NwN eaNKSN,wts I `~~OFtFaf~ONC[N![R ~~~0 P ~,~ r,~ ~ "',r T6T OOU& E ~ ~' ~ ~. C'wuNONG ~ (N.COFJ PAMR "G4F' ~M a..^iC. aafr ~'~~ ~ bN rC R'a Q ~ 6Ra. ' p~9 b '~'~ irar rP ~ w ~ p0 ~ F r~OLLiNS ~1,~Gr'.i ~ ~„r~ aNp n L[ Zoning: Comprehensive Plan Designation: Access: Water: Sewer: Availability: Recommendation: Fiscal Impact: R1 Principal Industrial Carvin Street and easement to Plantation Road Off site Off site Owners are trying to sell the property, but there is an access problem to Plantation Road. The property should be rezoned to Industrial District M1. Roanoke County to improve area water service with new storage tank and water lines. 1991 for water improvements.. Department of Economic Development Site name: Household of Faith Size: 35 acres ACTION NUMBER ITEM NUMBER _ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF R~ANOKE~ COUNTY ADMINISTRATIONROENTER COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE MEETING DATE: January 23, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: Ordinance authorizing the payment of a monetary bonus for exceptional services rendered by Roanoke County Employees COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND Many Roanoke County employees have performed exceptional services ob responsibilities, have contributed to above and beyond their j through special projects or have the betterment of Roanoke County ro ram available performed specific acts of heroism. The only p g to recognize these special contributions has been the mers.t paY plan which was established two years ago. However, continuous plan was instituted to recog b zeno~u ast an special one-time performance in an individual's j recognition. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION The State Code authorizes the governing body of any county, city and town to pay a monetary bonus for doespnotnhave esuchea rendered. At this time, Roanoke County program available to recognize its officers and employees. The attached ordinance would authorovedth a lcomm ttee 1 willf be monetary bonus program. If app three established consisting of the County Administrator, Assistant County Administrators and the Director of Human the guidelines and procedures under which Resources to develaPd• Requests for bonuses will be reviewed and bonuses would be p itable program. approved by this committee to assure an equ from the merit pay plan both This program differs significantly a lan allows up to a 10% in purpose and cost. The merit p Y p erformance by an salary increase based on continuous outstanding P ee's annual employee. The percentage is added to the employ amount salary. The bonus to° an employeebbased on one-time performance that would be given of exceptional services and would not be added to the employee's annual salary. At the end of each fiscal year, a report will be furnished to the Board showing the amount of any bonus paid, the recipient of the bonus and the exceptional services rendered. FISCAL IMPACT It is requested that the Board of Supervisor allocate $10,000 from the unappropriated balance to fund this program for the remainder of 1989-90. Future allocations will be included in the budget process. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors adopt the attached ordinance following second reading on February 13, 1990, allocate the necessary funds and authorize the County Administrator to begin implementation of a monetary bonus program. ~~ Elmer C. Hodge --- County Administrator ---------------------------------------- ------------------------------ ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: Yes No Abs Denied ( ) Eddy Received ( ) Johnson Referred McGraw To• Nickens Robers ~-e~ ~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, JANUARY 23, 1990 ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE PAYMENT OF A MONETARY BONUS FOR EXCEPTIONAL SERVICES BY COUNTY EMPLOYEES WHEREAS, Section 15.1-7.4 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, authorizes the governing body of any county, city and town to pay a monetary bonus to any local government officer or employee for exceptional services rendered; and, WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia deems that it is in its best interests to authorize the payment of monetary bonuses by the County Administrator to recognize exceptional services rendered by County officers and employees; and, WHEREAS, the first reading on this ordinance was held on January 23, 1990, and the second reading on this ordinance was held on February 13, 1990. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA: 1) That the County Administrator is hereby authorized to pay monetary bonuses to Roanoke County officers and employees who have rendered exceptional services to the County and its citizens in the performance of their duties. 2) That the County Administrator is hereby authorized to develop policies and procedures to implement the payment of a monetary bonus to County officers and employees. 3) That the sum of $10,000.00 is hereby appropriated for the purposes specified herein for fiscal year 1989-90. Within thirty (30) days of the end of the fiscal year, the County Administrator ~/-/ the amount of any bonus shall furnish a report to the Board showing paid, the recipient of any bonus, and the exceptional services rendered by the recipient. 4) That the effective date of this ordinance is February 13, 1990. _~ y AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, JANUARY 23, 1990 ORDINANCE 12390-4 ACCEPTING THE OFFER OF AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A LEASE OF REAL ESTATE, OFFICE SPACE FOR THE ROANORE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES LOCATED IN THE CITY OF SALEM BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Charter of Roanoke County, the acquisition of any interest in real estate, which includes a lease of office space, shall be accomplished by ordinance and pursuant to the authority found in Sections 15.1-262 and 15.1-897 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended; and 2. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Charter of Roanoke County the first reading on this ordinance was held on January 9, 1990, and the second reading was held on January 23, 1990, concerning the lease of office space for the use of the Roanoke County Department of Social Services in a building located at the southwest corner of Main Street and College Avenue in the City of Salem, Virginia, commonly known as the Salem Bank Building, together with all appurtenances thereto belonging; and 3. That this lease is with the COLLEGE AVENUE BLDG LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a Pennsylvania limited partnership, of approximately Thirteen Thousand, Two Hundred Sixty-seven (13,267) square feet of office space consisting of the third and fourth floors, together with forty (40) percent of the tenant parking provided for the premises but in no event not less than sixteen (16) spaces for a term commencing the first day of March 1990 and ending the 28th day of February 1994 for a base rental for the initial four (4) year term of the lease of Three Hundred Ninety-six Thousand Six Hundred Ei hty-three Dollars ($396,683) and with options to renew or extend g the term of the lease; and 4, That the lease agreement setting forth the terms and reference. conditions of this lease is incorporated herein by 5. That the County Administrator is authorized to execute this lease on behalf of the County of Roanoke and to execute such to other documents and take such other actions as are necessar form accomplish this transaction all of which shall be upon approved by the County Attorney. On motion of Supervisor Johnson, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None A COPY TE5TE: ~. Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Paul Mahoney, County Attorney John Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator Betty Lucas, Director, Soecial Services John Willey, Director, Real Estate Assessment Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER -~'- ~ AT A REGINIA HELDIAT TOHE ROANOKER COUNTY ADMIN STRATIONRC LATER COUNTY, VIRG MEETING DATE: January 23, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: Sxecudtione oflna Lease ofORealaEstat ut Office Space E for the Roanoke County Department of Social Services, located in~the City of Salem `' ~('~ COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR' S COMMENTS : ~(~vv~~rn-~-~°~ ~~'~`~"`~ ~~' `'~c..t BACKGROUND: On January 9, 1990, the Board of Supervisors held the first reading of an ordinance authorizing the County of Roanoke to renew a lease, which expires on February 28, 1990, for space occupied by the Department of Social Services on the third and fourth floors of the Salem Bank and Trust Building. The lease hasowners negotiated with College Avenue Building Limited Partnership, of the facility, for the 13,267 sq. ft. currently being utilized. The City of Salem contracts with the County of Roanoke to provide Social Services programs to its citizens and has indicated a desire to have Roanoke Metropolitan Government continue this arrangement. Currently, approximately 1/3 of the County's case load is for the City of Salem. At the request of the Board of Supervisors, we have contacted the School Administration to see if space was available at the old William Byrd Junior High School facility in Vinton, and also contacted the landlord to determine whether or not arrangements could be made to have the lease terminated more closely to the projected consolidation date of July 1, 1993. At the present time the School Administration is using the old William Byrd Junior High School facility for its Career Exploration Program and the only available space is in the lower level of the annex building, which represents an area of approximately 1,000 sq. ft. The School Administration has attempted to utilize the facility making the least modifications to the infrastructure, yet providing the number of labs needed to offer this program. With respect to the change in lease expiration date, we have negotiated a four year primary lease, which would expire February 28, 1994 with a four year and a two year renewal option. A riot t~eo past, we will be required to give one year's notice p termination concerning the intent to exercise ter sropof~d opo t nas The suggested rate is at the same $7.10 p q• previously negotiated, increasing by 25 cents per year. ...~=1 of the original lease proposal received by Attached is a copy the Department of Social Services for thi of ated rate of $7.lOrper of $7.50 with the final result beeag of t e lease. sq. ft. per year for the first y Attached is a copy of the ordinance authorizing the County Administrator to execute said documents. ALTERNATIVES AND IMPACT: RECOMMENDATION• Approved by, Respectfully submitted, >; J rn ~'~ •~'~'" Elmer C . Hodge John M. Chambl' s, Jr. Administrator County _ Assistant Administrator _______________ ------------ --------------------- VOTE ACTION No yes Abs Approved ( ) Motion by: Eddy Denied ( ) Johnson Received ( ) McGraw Referred ( ) Nickens To ( ) Robers r rV~ ~~ ~ Ti~fiNS-SOVTHEZN REALTY AND MORTGAGE CORPORATION POST OFFICE BOX 863~i ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24014 Telephone (703)387-4500 July 13, 1989 Mrs. Betty M. Lucas, Director Roanoke County Department of Social Services Salem Bank Building, 3rd Floor 220 E. Main Street Salem, VA 24153 Dear Mrs. Lucas: "~ I apologize for the delay in responding to your request for a written proposal to extend the lease for the space occupied by Roanoke County Social Services in the Salem Bank and Trust Building. We have spent quite a bit of time projecting certain options which we offer for your consideration. First. A three year lease with one option to extend for an additional two year teen. The landlord would continue to provide all maintenance. The tenant would be responsible for the cost of electricity and janitorial. The rental schedule would be as follows: Period Original 3/1/90-2/28/91 Term 3/1/91-2/28/92 3/1/92-2/28/93 Option 3/1/93-2/28/94 Tenn 3/1/94-2/28/95 Lase Rent $7.50/sq.ft.per yr. 7.75/sq.ft.per yr. 8.00/sq.ft.per yr. 8.25/sq.ft.per yr. 8.50/sq.ft.per yr. Second. A five year lease with an option to extend for an additional five year term. The landlord would be responsible for all maintenance. The tenant would be responsible for the cost of electricity and provide its own janitorial service. 'I"ne landlord would agree to install new ceiling and recessed light fixtures throughout the area leased by the tenant. The rent schedule for this would be: Period Original 3/1/90-2/28/91 Tenn 3/1/91-2/28/92 3/1/92-2/28/93 3/1/93-2/28/94 3/1/94-2/28/95 Option 3/1/95-2/28/2000 Term Base Rent $8.00 sq.ft.per yr. 8.25/sq.ft.per yr. 8.50/sq.ft.per yr. 8.75/sq.ft.per yr. 9.00/sq.ft.per yr. + Electricity + Janitorial + Electricity + Janitorial + Electricity + Janitorial + Electricity + Janitorial + Electricity + Janitorial + Electricity + Janitorial + Electricity + Janitorial + Electricity + Janitorial + Electricity + Janitorial + Electricity + Janitorial Teams to be mutually agreed upon. For your information and assistance in evaluating the above, we have included herewith a schedule of the electricity cost for the 3rd & 4th floors, which you occupy, for the past three years. L9e strongly believe that it is more cost efficient to the user to pay for electrical cost rather than for us to project an BrvkQrage of Salectad Commarc)ai and InvestmQnt Raal EStatQ TRAITS-SOUTH ERM '~ expense which would of necessity have to include a margin for error and include this in projected rental rates. The teams and conditions of any new lease wr~uld be essentially the same as those in your existing lease. Specifically, the space leased would remain the same (13,267 square feet), parking allocation would continue at 40~ of existing spaces, tax escalator would remain at 400 of any increase over the base year of 1978 (8576.25), and the landlord would be responsible for all maintenance. After you have had an opportunity to consider the above we will be glad to discuss with you, at your convenience any questions you may have. Sincerely, TRANS-SOUTHERN REALTY & P/YJR<T~'TM.1:C~ CO°,PO~TICA`: Nancy L. Huff Enclosures , ..~ - / AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, JANUARY 23, 1990 ORDINANCE ACCEPTING THE OFFER OF AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A LEASE OF REAL ESTATE, OFFICE SPACE FOR THE ROANOKE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES LOCATED IN THE CITY OF SALEM BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Charter of Roanoke County, the acquisition of any interest in real estate, which includes a lease of office space, shall be accomplished by ordinance and pursuant to the authority found in Sections 15.1-262 and 15.1-897 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended; and 2. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Charter of Roanoke County the first reading on this ordinance was held on January 9, 1990, and the second reading was held on January 23, 1990, concerning the lease of office space for the use of the Roanoke County Department of Social Services in a building located at the southwest corner of Main Street and College Avenue in the City of Salem, Virginia, commonly known as the Salem Bank Building, together with all appurtenances thereto belonging; and 3. That this lease is with the COLLEGE AVENUE BLDG LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a Pennsylvania limited partnership, of approximately Thirteen Thousand, Two Hundred Sixty-seven (13,267) square feet of office space consisting of the third and fourth floors, together with forty (40) percent of the tenant parking provided for the premises but in no event not less than sixteen (16) spaces for a term commencing the first day of March 1990 and ending the 28th day -z of February 1994 for a base rental for the initial four (4) year term of the lease of Three Hundred Ninety-six Thousand Six Hundred Eighty-three Dollars ($396,683) and with options to renew or extend the term of the lease; and 4. That the lease agreement setting forth the terms and conditions of this lease is incorporated herein by reference. 5. That the County Administrator is authorized to execute this lease on behalf of the County of Roanoke and to execute such other documents and take such other actions as are necessary to accomplish this transaction all of which shall be upon form approved by the County Attorney. N k-n "~, AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, JANUARY 23, 1990 ORDINANCE 12390-5 AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION OF THE BRIDLEWOOD WATER SYSTEM, THE FALLING CREEK WATER SYSTEM AND THE CHERRY HILL WATER SYSTEM AND THE TRANSFER OF THE FALLING CREEK WATER SYSTEM TO THE TOWN OF VINTON WHEREAS, on November 4, 1986, the voters of Roanoke County approved at referendum the issuance of general obligation bonds to finance the costs of improving the County's public water supply; and, WHEREAS, $1,000,000 of this referendum were allocated to the purchase of selected private water systems and wells; and, WHEREAS, these bonds were issued March 1, 1988 through the Virginia Resources Authority, and the proceeds used to acquire five (5) privately owned water systems, leaving a balance of approximately $477,000; and, WHEREAS, the Utility Director has negotiated an agreement to acquire an additional three (3) privately owned water systems; and, WHEREAS, Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter directs that the acquisition of real estate be accomplished by ordinance; the first reading of this ordinance was held on December 19, 1989, and the second reading was held on January 23, 1990. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA: 1) That the acquisition and acceptance of the Cherry Hill Water System, which serves the Greenhill subdivision located in west County, from the Cherry Hill Water Company for the sum of Eleven Thousand ($11,000.00) Dollars is hereby authorized and approved. 2) That the acquisition and acceptance of the Bridlewood Water System, which serves the Bridlewood subdivision in southwest County, from Water Distributors, Inc. for the sum of Ninety Thousand One Hundred ($90,100.00) Dollars is hereby authorized and approved. 3) That the acquisition and acceptance of the Falling Creek Water System, which serves the Falling Creek subdivision in east County, from Water Distributors, Inc. for the sum of One Hundred Twenty Thousand Four Hundred ($120,400.00) Dollars is hereby roved. That the acquisition of this water authorized and app system is subject to modification of the May 25, 1979 Agreement with the Town of Vinton to allow the County to provide water services within the area designated by said agreement. 4) That the assignment of the County's right to acquire the Falling Creek Water System, or the subsequent sale of the Falling Creek Water System by the County to the Town of Vinton for the sum of One Hundred Twenty Thousand Four Hundred ($120,400.00) Dollars is hereby authorized and approved. The transfer of the Falling Creek Water System to the Town of Vinton is authorized pursuant to Section 16.01 of the Roanoke County Charter since it is being made available for other public uses. 5) That the sum of One Hundred One Thousand One Hundred ($101,100.00) Dollars is hereby appropriated from the 1988 General Obligation Bond proceeds to fund the purchases of the Cherry Hill Water System and the Bridlewood Water System in the amounts and for the purposes described herein. The full faith and credit of the led ed to the payment of this bond; however the County County is p g lans to pay this bond from the proceeds of the revenues from the ~ p Enterprise Fund. That the sum of County water system and Utility One Hundred Twenty Thousand Four Hundred ($120,400.00) Dollars for the acquisition of the Falling Creek Water System is hereby appropriated from the Utility Enterprise Fund. 6) That the County Administrator is hereby authorized to execute such documents and take such actions as may be necessary to accomplish these transactions, all of which shall be on form approved by the County Attorney. On motion of Supervisor Nickens, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: ~~ Mary H. llen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc; File Utilities Cliff Craig, Director, Paul Mahoney, County Attorney Phillip Henry, Director, Engineering Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance Reta Busher, Director, Management & Budget George Nester, Vinton Town Manager ACTION # ITEM NUMBER ~ -~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: January 23, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: Acquisition of Wate COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: i; > > .1.. ~. f. ~ ~.. r Systems ~i. ~ i..!'. i a f~C. Y/~7 t /'~~ ~.-s. ~P N- n ~'-t" _ " ~ - ~~~ ~} ~ S ;~, ; ~,~t x,; > ~~ BACKGROUND' The 1986 Bond Referendum approved by the voters included $1~Roanoke County p To date the Cou ty has pur chased theefollowing by systems: Forest Edge $131,000 Cherokee Hills $ 67,013 Carriage Hills $ 35,000 Clearbrook $ 43,000 Hollins $263,242 The remaining balance in the Bond Issue including earned interest is $477,611. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Staff has negotiated the purchase of three water systems from Water Distributors, Inc. and Cherry Hill Water Company. They are the Bridlewood Water System, which serves 125 customers in the Bridlewood Subdivision off Brambleton Avenue South; the Cherry Hill Water System, which serves 15 customers in the Greenhill Subdivision located in West County; and the Falling Creek Water System, which serves 193 customers in the Falling Creek Subdivision located in East County next to the County line. Staff has established the total value of each system using the value of wells and storage currently provided. This is the same method of value used in the prior purchases of water systems. The value of each system used by Staff in the purchase negotiations has been given to Board members under separate cover. The Falling Creek Water System is within the water service area which was assigned to Vinton in the May 1979 agreemenT bed the the Town and Roanoke County. The Town of Vinton has app purchase of the Falling Creek Water System from Roanoke County for the same cost that the County is purchasing this system. The ordinance authorizing the acquisition of the three above water systems also authorizes the sale of the Falling Creek Water System to the Town of Vinton. FISCAL Funds are available from the 1986 Bond Issue for the purchase of the Cherry Hill and Bridlewood Water Systems. paymentuon the 1986 Bond Issue was for General Obligation Bonds, Bonds has been and is planned to be made from the Utility Enterprise Fund for water. Funds are available within the Utility Fund for the purchase of the Falling Creek Water System. Upon sale of this system to the Town of Vinton, the funds will be returned to the Utility Fund. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Board approve the purchase of the Bridlewood Water System, the Cherry Hill Water System, and the Falling Creek Water System under the provisions of and at a cost detailed in an ordinance adopted to affect the acquisitions. The first reading ofstheldronnDecemberh191Z1989theThersecond reading water systems wa of the ordinance is to be held at this meeting. SUBMITTED BY: Cliffor r g- •E• Utility Director Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to APPROVED: 1! ;~/ ~~) Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ACTION VOTE Motion by: No Yes Abs Eddy Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers ~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT~ESDAY~JANUARYN23-A1990ISTRATION CENTER, ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION OF THE BRIDLEWOOD WATER SYSTEM, THE FALLING CREEK WATER SYSTEM AND THE CHERRY HILL WATER SYSTEM AND THE TRANSFER OF THE FALLING CREEK WATER SYSTEM TO THE TOWN OF VINTON WHEREAS, on November 4, 1986, the voters of Roanoke County approved at referendum the issuance of general obligation bonds to finance the costs of improving the County's public water supply; and, WHEREAS, $1,000,000 of this referendum were allocated to the purchase of selected private water systems and wells; and, WHEREAS, these bonds were issued March 1, 1988 through the Virginia Resources Authority, and the proceeds used to acquire five (5) privately owned water systems, leaving a balance of approximately $477,000; and, WHEREAS, the Utility Director has negotiated an agreement to acquire an additional three (3) privately owned water systems; and, WHEREAS, Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter directs that the acquisition of real estate be accomplished by ordinance; the first reading of this ordinance was held on December 19, 1989, and the second reading was held on January 23, 1990. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA: 1) That the acquisition and acceptance of the Cherry Hill Water System, which serves the Greenhill subdivision located in west County, from the Cherry Hill Water Company for the sum of Eleven Thousand ($11,000.00) Dollars is hereby authorized and ~- .+~, approved. 2) That the acquisition and acceptance of the Bridlewood Water System, which serves the Bridlewood subdivision in southwest County, from Water Distributors, Inc. for the sum of Ninety Thousand One Hundred ($90,100.00) Dollars is hereby authorized and approved. 3) That the acquisition and acceptance of the Falling Creek Water System, which serves the Falling Creek subdivision in east County, from Water Distributors, Inc. for the sum of One Hundred Twenty Thousand Four Hundred ($120,400.00) Dollars is hereby authorized and approved. That the acquisition of this water system is subject to modification of the May 25, 1979 Agreement with the Town of Vinton to allow the County to provide water services within the area designated by said agreement. 4) That the assignment of the County's right to acquire the Falling Creek Water System, or the subsequent sale of the Falling Creek Water System by the County to the Town of Vinton for the sum of One Hundred Twenty Thousand Four Hundred ($120,400.00) Dollars is hereby authorized and approved. The transfer of the Falling Creek Water System to the Town of Vinton is authorized pursuant to Section 16.01 of the Roanoke County Charter since it is being made available for other public uses. 5) That the sum of One Hundred One Thousand One Hundred ($101,100.00) Dollars is hereby appropriated from the 1988 General Obligation Bond proceeds to fund the purchases of the Cherry Hill Water System and the Bridlewood Water System in the amounts and for the purposes described herein. The full faith and credit of the ` ~ ~~ County is pledged to the payment of this bond; however the County plans to pay this bond from the proceeds of the revenues from the County water system and Utility Enterprise Fund. That the sum of One Hundred Twenty Thousand Four Hundred ($120,400.00) Dollars for the acquisition of the Falling Creek Water System is hereby appropriated from the Utility Enterprise Fund. 6) That the County Administrator is hereby authorized to execute such documents and take such actions as may be necessary to accomplish these transactions, all of which shall be on form approved by the County Attorney. ~+ ~ ACTION NUMBER ITEM NUMBER ~ ~ - AT A REGULAR MEETING OF ~~~ COUNTY UADM NISTRATIONRCENTER COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE MEETING DATE: January 23, 1990 SUBJECT: Appointments to Committees, Commissions and Boards COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: 1. Communit Corrections Resources Board One-year term of Edmund J. Kielty, Alternate. His term expired August 13, 1988. One-year term of Bernard Hairston expired August 13, 1989. 2. Grievance Panel Two-year term of Eugene Martin expires February 23, 1990. 3. Health De artment Board of Directors Two-year term of Susan Adcock expired November 26, 1989 4. Landfill Citizens Advisor Committee re resentative from the Cave Spring Magisterial Carl L. Wright, p District has resigned and another representative should e appointed. 5. Parks and Recreation Advisor Commission Three-year term of Alice Gillespie, Hollins Magisterial District expired June 30, 1989. 6. Re Tonal Partnershi Site Advisor Committee Three-year term of Charles Saul expired December 21, 1989. SUBMITTED BY: Mary H. Allen Clerk to the Board ~* _"' fo APPROVED BY: ~~aj ;, Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ---------------------- VOTE ------ ACTION Yes No Abs Approved ( ) Motion by: Eddy Denied ( ) Johnson Received ( ) McGraw Referred Nickens To• Robers ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER '~~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: January 23, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: Status of Appointments to the Court Service Unit Advisory Council/Youth and Family Services Advisory Board COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: On December 13, 1988, the Board of Supervisors voted to continue this Board and appoint new members based on a recommendation by Michael Lazzuri, who would contact the current members to determine whether they wished to continue serving. At the January 9, 1990 meeting, the Board of Supervisors directed the County staff to again contact Michael Lazzuri concerning the status of this Board. Attached is a memorandum from John Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator, regarding the activity of the Council/Board in the past year. The Board of Supervisors may wish to declare this organization "Inactive" effective March 22, 1990. At that time, there will only be one member remaining whose term has not expired. Within 90 days, Mr. Chambliss advises that a review should be completed and a full recommendation will be made to the Board of Supervisors. Until a recommendation is forthcoming, the Court Service Unit Advisory Council/Youth and Family Services Advisory Board appointments will be removed from the agenda for consideration. Attached is a list of the present membership and their expiration dates. By April 1, all appointments except one will have expired. SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: 1 Mary H. Allen Elmer C. Hodge Clerk to the Board County Administrator ~- ~ Approved Denied Received Referred To: ACTION VOTE Yes No Abs Motion by: Eddy Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers ir7~F: ,r~-~._ . ~ ,~~~ o~ :~. a 1$ E50 88 SFSQUICEN7EH~`P~ M E M 0 RAN D U M A BtaufiruJ Beginning HUMAN SERVICES ASSISTANT COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator To: John M. Chambliss, Jr. ' From: Assistant Administrator Human Services Date: January 18, 1990 'ect: Status of the Court Service Unit Advisory Council/Youth Subs and Family Services Advisory Boar concerning the status I talked with Mike Lazzuri this mor council/Youth an ast~ear of the Court Service Uand he advi ed that during the p Services Advisory Board, g The first was reasonably they attempted to have threeoorltiattended and the th Ba d upon well attended, the second p Y attendance (there waske'saoriginalrfeeling awas a to. disband the past performance, Mi committee . - After talking with the new Director for the State's Department art of the Department of of Youth Services, formerly a P rese Corrections, he requested that action not be taken at t e P as his plan, beginning July 1990, was time to disband the committee of the to have more citizen committee ac c fling for na meeting e Coure Services Units. Mike Lazzuri is to discuss their potential rol committee in early February, 1990,. and is attempting to schedule a tteefandnthe cnew Director oftthe between the Chairman of the Commtoi recommend an appropriate course Department of Youth Services, est that no new of action. At this time, Mike Lazurr a1lowlthe gmeeting in early members be appointed to the council, discuss the proposed need withthe e Board iog February to occur, and make a final recommendation to Director, ro riate status for the committee. Supervisors as to the app P rant for with the exception of the approval of one g Thus far, the Youth and Family Services Divis n ~ o sh wn S ae iinteresparin Bear that phase of the function has committee. Perhaps this committee l~um e b the needs ofithehState, future and a new committee, which ~^' 800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24018-0798 (703) 772-2002 FAX (703) 772-2030 P.O. BOX 29 established utilizing the strong ' ue service. personalities of our present committee to contin taken on this I respectfully request that no action be ain within committee at the present time and that we review it ag ninet days and make a full recommendation to the Board the next Y of Supervisors. Thank you. JNiC / cw cc: Mike Lazzuri COURT SERVICE UNIT ADVISORY COUNCIL/ YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES ADVISORY BOARD DISTRICT TERM 2 Years Gerald Curtiss Catawba 2826 Embassy Drive NW Reappointed 4/26/88 Roanoke, VA 24012 Phone: 362-8558 Roger Smith Rt. 1, Box 186 Catawba, VA 24070 Home: 384-6552 (Unlisted) Office: 389-0362 James L. Trout 4320 Pitzer Road Roanoke, VA 24014 Home: 345-6093 Office: 345-0981 Ted R. Powell 5831 Penguin Drive,SW Roanoke, VA 24018 Phone: 774-2557 Gary J. Minter 129 Dexter Road Roanoke, VA 24019 Hoyt C. Rath 815 Mason Road Vinton, VA 24179 Phone: 342-1214 Dr. J. Andrew Archer 4039 Pebble Dr. Roanoke, VA 24014 Home: 344-2606 Office: 982-7273 EXP_ 1RES 3/22/90 Catawba 2 Years 3/22/90 Reappointed 4/26/88 2 Years ~ Cave Spring 2 Years u. s Cave Spring Hollins 2 Years 3/22/90 Vinton 2 Years Vinton 2 Years COURT SERVICE UNIT ADVISORY COUNCIL/ YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES ADVISORY BOARD Page 2 James K. Sanders 5418 Warwood Drive Roanoke, Virginia 24018 Phone: 774-3318 (Reappointed 2/14/89) Ms. Sherry Robison 3829 Vauxhall Road SW Roanoke, VA 24018 (Reappointed 2/14/89} YOUTH MEMBERS DISTRICT Windsor Hills Windsor Hills ~' / C-4 TERM EXPIRES 2 years 3/22/91 2 years 3122190 v (Added by Board Action on November 13, 1985.) Cave Spring 1 year Tracy Rothschild 6633 Old Barn Circle Salem, Virginia 24153 Phone: 989-4931 Cassidee R. Nickens 3084 Woodway Road, SE Roanoke, Virgina 24014 Phone: 344-4033 Molly Eller 3611 McDaniel Drive Salem, Virginia 24153 Phone: 380-4809 William Byrd Glenvar High Emily Reaser Northside High 6003 Janda Drive Roanoke, Virginia 24019 JUDICIAL APPOINTMENT (Appointed by Judges1 None *Notify Michael J. Lazzuri, Director of Court Services of new appointees. ALL TERMS TO BE RENEWED FOR TWO YEARS, EXCEPT FOR YOUTH MEMBERS. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JANUARY 23, 1990 RESOLUTION NO. 12390-6 APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That that certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for January 23, 1990, designated as Item L - Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 3, inclusive, as follows: 1. Approval of Minutes - May 23, 1989 2. Approval of Minutes - January 3, 1990 3. Confirmation of Committee Appointments to the Mental Health Services of the Roanoke Valley Community Services Board, Library Board and Transportation and Safety Commission. 2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this resolution. Items L-2, L-3 on motion of Supervisor Nickens with the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None Item L-1 on motion of Supervisor Nickens with the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None ABSTAIN: Supervisor Eddy A COPY TESTE: ~- ~,~ Mary H. lien, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors 1/26/90 CC: File -/ 810 Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Roanoke County Administration Center 3738 Brambleton Avenue, SW Roanoke, Virginia 24018 May 23, 1989 The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, met this day at the Roanoke County Administration Center, this being the fourth Tuesday, and the second regularly scheduled meeting of the month of May, 1989. IN RE: CALL TO ORDER Chairman Garrett called the meeting to order at 3:02 p.m. The roll call was taken. MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Lee Garrett, Vice Chairman Richard Robers, Supervisors Bob L. Johnson, Steven A. McGraw, Harry C. Nickens MEMBERS ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator; John M. Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator for Human Services; John R. Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator of Community Services and Development; Don M. Myers, Assistant County Administrator for Management Services; Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney, Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk; Anne Marie Fedder, Information Officer 812 WHEREAS, Glenvar High School was recently honored as a recipient of the 1988-89 Secondary School Recognition Program Award; and WHEREAS, the school was one of 629 schools from the United States and Puerto Rico nominated for this honor; and WHEREAS, only 218 schools in the United States and four in the State of Virginia were recipients of this award of excellence; and WHEREAS, Glenvar High School was cited for its community support and student involvement as expressed by 100$ participation in the Parent Teachers Association; the excellence of its learning environment and programs; and the high quality of its staff and administration. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, does hereby extends its congratulations to Principal Al McClearn, the assistant principals and 56 teachers and staff, and the 638 pupils of Glenvar High School for their outstanding accomplishments; and FURTHER, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, expresses its pride in Glenvar High School and wishes continued success to all those who participated in this achievement. On motion of Supervisor Garrett, seconded by Supervisor Johnson and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None 81~ ~~ NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors o f Roanoke County that we expre ss our sincere appreciation to the officers, members, and volunteers of the Roanoke Valley Youth Soccer Club, Inc. for their tireless efforts in organizing and holding the FOURTH ANNUAL FESTIVAL SOCCER TOURNAMENT and wish to each participant a warm welcome to the Roanoke Valley and much success in their athletic endeavors. On motion of Supervisor Garrett, seconded by Supervisor Nickens and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, GArrett NAYS: None 3. Recognition of Roanoke County's All America City Award from the Roanoke Regional Chamber of Commerce. C. Thom Robinson Executive Vice President of the Roanoke Regional Chamber of Commerce presented a Resolution of Congratulations to Roanoke County for winning the All-America City Award. Mr. Hodge announced that the County has receive several resolutions of congratulation, including one from the City of Salem. IN RE: NEW BUSINESS 1. Presentation on All America City Recognition. Mr. Hodge presented to Brian Duncan a framed picture of the Roanoke Market and expressed appreciation for his hard work on the All American City application and other activities involved in the project. Mr. Duncan announced he would donate 81fi notification as possible before developing the property. The Lewis Gale property lease has been sent to the property owners and .will have a one-year notice before development. Over $1 million has been spent developing Green Hill Park. Portable fencing at Shamrock and McVitty Parks can be relocated to Greenhill Park when necessary. There will be the same number of fields available. Mr. Chambliss recommended the continued utilization of Shamrock Park and McVitty Park until the owners have a need to expand, and to develop Greenhill Park as money becomes available. Yvonne Willis, a member of the Parks and Recreation Commission spoke in favor of continuing development of Greenhill Park with the additional necessary funding for fencing, backstops and phase II development. In response to a question from Supervisor Nickens, Mr. Chambliss advised there are more facilities available now in the Glenvar area than in 1983. Supervisor McGraw expressed concern about the lack of long-term commitment from the owners of Shamrock Park and McVitty Parks and funding for continued development of Greenhill Park. Supervisor Nickens moved to approve the staff recommendation. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Johnson and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: Supervisors Robers, McGraw IN RE: FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 81 8 Supervisor Johnson moved to approve the first reading of the ordinance. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Nickens and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None IN RE: REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS SUPERVISOR ROBERS: (1) Plans are proceeding on visits from Northern Virginia through George Mason zzuversity. (2) asked the County Administrator to contact certain individuals on the possibility of establishing a "smart highway" on the proposed highway to Blacksburg. Chairman Garrett directed staff to study the possibility and report back to the board. (3) Announced formation of an Advisory Committee to meet with economic development staff and develop plans for continued economic development. (4) Moved that the Board support sending letters to businesses using disposable containers asking that they voluntarily use different packaging. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Nickens and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: Supervisor Johnson (4) Has requested information concerning choices for school systems and choice of schools for parents and will give to School Board and Consolidation Negotiating Committee. 82 0 Supervisor Johnson moved to approve the Consent Agenda. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Garrett and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None RESOLUTION NO. 52389-5 APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM J - CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That that certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for May 23, 1989, designated as Item J - Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 5, inclusive, as follows: 1. Confirmation of committee appointments to the Clean Valley Counc il and the Fifth Planning District Commission; ratification of appointment to the Transportation Safety Commission. 2. Request for acceptance of Stone Mill Drive and Millwheel Drive into the Va. Department of Transportation Secondary System. 3. Authorization of lease/purchase for two Pierce Arrow Fire Trucks. 4. Acceptance of a temporary construction easement being conveyed by De bbie Reynolds for the location of a water line adjacent to North Lakes Office Park and settlement of outstanding water bill. 5. Acceptance of 0.18 mile of Spring Run Drive into VDOT Secondary System. X22 Section 10, which map was recorded in Plat Book 10, Page 115 of the records of the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia on December 1, 1987, and that by reason of the recordation of said map no report from a Board of Viewers, nor consent or donation of right-of-way from the abutting property owners is necessary. The Board hereby guarantees said right-of-way for drainage. 3. That said roads known as Stone Mill Drive and Millwheel Drive and which are shown on a certain sketch accompanying this Resolution, be, and the same are hereby established as public roads to become a part of the State Secondary System of Highways in Roanoke County, only from and after notification of official acceptance of said street or highway by the Virginia Department of Transportation. On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor Garrett and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None RESOLUTION 52389-5. c AtTIfiORIZING THE ACQUISITION OF TWO FIRE TfdJC:KS AND DQUIPi~Tr, ACCEPTING THE OFFER THEREFQR AND A~PRf7VING THE INI~T RATE, UPON CER'I'Aat TEFd~iS AND OONDI'I'IONS WI~REAS, the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke has determined that it is necessary arxi ea~edient to enter into a lease/purchase agreement to acquire two fire trucks and certain equipment to provide protection within the County; and WF~2EA.S, the County has solicited offers for said lease/purchase financing and acquisition; and 824 On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor Garrett arxi carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: S~zpervisors Jotu~son, Robers, McGraw, Nick,ens, Garrett NAYS: None IN RE: CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS 1. Bob Butterworth to speak concerning the proposed landfill. Mr. Butterworth asked for assurances from the Board that Bradshaw Road would not be used as an access road to the potential landfill site at Smith Gap. Supervisor McGraw moved that the application process should include the provision that Bradshaw Road would not be used as an access road. There was no second and the motion died. 2. Deborah Zamorski requested that the Board of Supervisors submit Part A applications for the top three landfill sites instead of only two. 3. James Hensley asked when the committee established to study the recommendations made by the Landfill Citizens Advisory Committee would be named and begin work. Supervisor Nickens asked that the County Administrator keep the members of the Landfill Citizens Advisory Committee informed on the status of the newly formed committee. ~2g Supervisor Johnson moved to reconsider appointments to the Consolidation Negotiations Committee. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Nickens and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None Supervisor Nickens moved to appoint Lee Garrett to replace Supervisor Nickens on the Consolidation Negotiations Committee. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Johnson and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supe=rvisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None IN RE: PUBLIC HEARINGS 589-1 Public Hearing to elicit comment on the establishment of the construction fund priority for the Secondary System of the State Highways for Fiscal Year 1989/90. Engineering Director Phillip Henry presented the staff report. He advised that the current Six-Year Plan was approved by the Board and Virginia Department of Transportation in 1988 and is being brought back to consider the funding for the next fiscal year. The budget is approximately $2.4 million. Mr. Henry highlighted the major projects. There were no citizens to speak on this issue. 828 Supervisor Johnson, Mr. Harrington advised the petitioner has no specific plans at this time for the property. Ed Natt, attorney for the petitioner was present to answer questions. Wanda Manuel, 4930 Bower Road S. W. expressed concern about changes to the Roanoke County Land Use Plan, especially those that change Neighborhood Conservation. Following discussion, Supervisor Johnson moved to approve the amendment to the Future Land Use Plan. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Nickens and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None FINAL ORDER NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDERED that the aforementioned parcel of land which is contained in the Roanoke County Tax Maps as Parcel 50.05-1-26 and recorded in Deed Book and legally described below, be amended in the Future Land Use Plan from Neighborhood Conservation Designation to Transition Designation. BE IT FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this order be transmitted to the Secretary of the Planning Commission and that he be directed to reflect that change on the official zoning map of Roanoke County. A 1.612 acre parcel of land, generally located on the ease side of Route 460 adiacent to the 83 0 589-5 Petition of JERRY & BONNIE WILKINSON requesting rezoning from B-2 Business to B-3 Business with a Special Exception Permit of a tract containing .459 acres and located at 7637 Williamson Road in the Hollins Magisterial District. Mr. Harrington presented the staff report. The petitioners plan on selling and displaying boats at the property. The Planning Commission recommended approval with proffered conditions. Jerry Wilkinson was for the property. Supervisor Johnson proffered conditions. The Nickens and carried by the fol AYES: Supervisors Johnson, present and described their plans moved to grant the petition with motion was seconded by Supervisor lowing recorded vote: Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None FINAL ORDER NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDERED that the aforementioned parcel of land which is contained in the Roanoke County Tax Maps as Parcel 27.11-3-11 and recorded in Deed Book 3, page 84 and legally described below, be rezoned from B-2 Business District to B-3 Business District BE IT FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this order be transmitted to the Secretary of the Planning Commission and that 832 (6) Agree to not install any additional signage. (7) Agree to limit total number of boats and trailers on lot to fifteen (15) (8) Agree to maintain current hours of operation of 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Monday through Friday and 10:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. on Saturdays with no hours of operation on Sunday. 589-6 Petition of CENTRAL FIDELITY BANK, requesting to amend the Proffered Conditions of a tract containing 1.02 acres and located on the West Side of U. S. 220 at its intersection with Valley Drive in the Cave Spring Magisterial District. Mr. Harrington presented the staff report. The petitioner is requesting an additional entrance on a side street. The Planning Commission recommended approval with the other original proffered conditions. Supervisor Robers moved to grant the petition with proffered conditions. The motion was seconded by Supervisor McGraw and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens NAYS: None ABSTAIN: Supervisor Garrett FINAL ORDER NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDERED that the aforementioned parcel of land which is contained in the Roanoke County Tax Maps 8 ~ ~ -~ 1) The site will be developed in substancial conformity to the concept plan prepared by Balzer and Associates, Inc. and dated March 15, 1989. The building may be oriented in a slightly different manner to improve visibility and drive-thru access. 2) Site lighting will be directed downward, and will not exceed 20 feet in height. Signs will not be lighted after 10:00 p.m. 3) Free standing signs will be limited to 50 square feet, and will not exceed 20 feet in height. 4) The entrance on U.S. Route 220 will be placed adjacent to the northern property line to facilitate a shared entrance between the proposed bank site and the remaining property to the north. S) Central Fidelity Bank, Inc. will co-ordinate with Roanoke County to enable the County to upgrade the storm sewer along the eastern property line (beside 17.5. Route 220) prior to Central Fidelity paving an entrance onto U.S. Route 220, so long as said cooperation does not delay the planned Branch opening on December 12, 1989. 589-7 Petition of the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors requesting to amend the Future Land Use Plan Map to include a 1.5 acre parcel presently located in the City of Salem designated as Tax Map Parcel 240-4-1, and assign appropriate zoning designation resulting from a boundary line relocation effective July 1, 1989. Mr. Harrington presented the staff report. The property will now become part of Roanoke County due to a boundary relocation agreement with the City of Salem. Supervisor Nickens moved to grant the petition. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Johnson and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None 836 Supervisor McGraw moved to approve first reading of the ordinance. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Johnson and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None 589-9 Public Hearing and Ordinance to increase the salaries of members of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County pursuant to Section 3.07 of the Roanoke County Charter and Section 14.1-46.01 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended. County Attorney .Paul Mahoney presented the staff report. No one was present to speak to the ordinance. Supervisor Nickens moved to approve the first reading of the ordinance. The motion was seconded by Supervisor McGraw and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens NAYS: Supervisor Garrett P. PUBLIC HEARING AND SECOND READING OF ORDINANCE 589-10 Public Hearing and Ordinance authorizing the issuance of not to exceed $470,000 bonds to finance the purchase of equipment for school purposes and Ordinance repealing and rescinding ordinance 41189-10 which authorized the issuance of $440,000 General Obligation Bonds to finance the purchase of equipment for school purposes. 0-52389-6 83 8 -- -- _-a~i- s~I~~f`-~e~Bo~yin--~e-~ozm arr3 upon ~e tentis established pursuant to this ordir~~r~ce is hereby authorized. 2. Sale of the Bonds. It is determined to be in the best interest of the County to sell the Bonds to the Virginia Public School Authority ("VPSA") at par, upon the terms established pursuant to this ordinance. The appropriate officers of the County are hereby authorized and directed to sell the Bonds to VPSA. 3. Details of the Bar~c~s. The Bonds shall be issuable in fully registered form; shall be dated the date of issuance ar~d delivery of the Bonds; shall be designated "C7au~ty of Roanoke General Obligation Equipment Financing Bonds, Roanoke County Series 1989"; shall bear interest payable semi-annually on Jane 1 and December 1 (each an "Interest Payment Date"), beginning December 1, 1989, at the rates established in accordance with paragraph 4 of this ordinance; arxi the principal amaint of the Bonds shall be payable in annual installments on the dates (each a "Principal Payment Date") and in the amounts established in accordance with paragraph 4 of this ordinance. The Bonds shall be issued as a single, typewritten bond substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A. 4. Interest Rates: Principal Installments. (a) The Ar.~au.ni- strator of the Cauity is hereby authorized arxi directed to accept the interest rate or rates on the Bonds determined by VPSA by cca~~etitive bid, provided that no such interest rate or rates shall exceed nine percent (9 ~) per anrnmn, and the execution and delivery of the Bonds as described in Section 6 hereof shall conclusively evidence the same as having been approved arxi authorized by this ordinance. (b) ~e principal amxmt of the Bonds shall be payable in five (5 ) annual installments of not to exceed $94,000 each, the first of which shall be due Dex~mber' 1, 1989, and the re~nainirxl installments aruYUally thereafter. 5. Payment: Paring Ar.~t arxi Registrar. Zhe Treasurer of the County is hereby designated as Bond Registrar arx3 Paying Agent for the Bonds and the following provisions shall apply: (a) all payments of principal of and interest on the Bonds shall be made in iiranediately available funds to VPSA at or before 11:00 a.m. on the applicable Interest Payment Date and Principal Payment Date, or if such date is not a business date for Virginia banks or for the Cwm~onwealth of Virginia, then at or before 11:00 a.m. on the business day preceding such Interest Pay- ment Date and Principal Payment Date; and (b) all overdue payments of principal or interest shall bear interest at the applicable interest rate or rates on the Bonds. 6. EScecution of the Boixis. Zhe Chairman or Vice Chairman ar~d the Clerk or any Deputy Clerk of the Board are authorized arxi directed to execute and deliver the Bonds in an aggregate principal amauzt of $470,000 arxi - to affix the seal of the County hereto. 7. F~11 Faith and Credit. The full faith and credit of the County are hereby irrevocably pledged for the payment of principal of ar~d 84 0 -~-~-~~ ~n motion o~ Supervisor Nickens, seconded by Supervisor Johnson and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None ORDINANCE 52389-7 REPEALING AND RESCINDING ORDINANCE 41190-10 WHICH AUTHORIZED THE ISSUANCE OF $440,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION SCHOOL BONDS TO FINANCE THE PURCHASE OF EQUIPMENT WHEREAS, on April 11, 1989, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, adopted an ordinance authorizing the issuance of not to exceed $440,000 general obligation school bonds to finance the purchase of certain equipment, said bonds to be sold to the Virginia Public School Authority (VPSA); and WHEREAS, VPSA has notified the County that the amount of this borrowing should be $470,000; and WHEREAS, it is necessary to correct this action by the adoption of an ordinance with the corrected amount, and by repeal- ing the previous ordinance; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this repealing ordinance was held on May 9, 1989; the second reading was held on May 23, 1989. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That Ordinance 41189-10 adopted on April 11, 1989, Roanoke County, Virginia, which authorized the issuance of not to exceed $440,000 general obligation school bonds to finance the purchase of certain equipment, said bonds to be sold to the Vir- ginia Public School Authority (VPSA) is hereby repealed and rescinded. 842 Supervisor Robers announced he had received a letter from the Virginia Department of Transportation addressing the traffic concerns raised by the citizens in Georgetown Park. IN RE: ADJOURNMENT At 8:00 p.m., Supervisor Johnson moved to adjourn. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Nickens and carried by a unanimous voice vote. Lee Garrett, Chairman Jl ~~ i~ L-2 Opp Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Roanoke County Administration Center 3738 Brambleton Avenue, SW Roanoke, Virginia 24018 January 3, 1990 The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, met this day at the Roanoke County Administration Center, this being the Organizational Meeting for the 1990 year. IN RE: CALL TO ORDER Vice Chairman Robers called the meeting to order at 9:01 a.m. The roll call was taken. MEMBERS PRESENT: Vice Chairman Richard Robers, Supervisors Steven A. McGraw, Lee B. Eddy, Bob L. Johnson, Harry C. Nickens MEMBERS ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator; John M. Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator for Human Services; John R. Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator of Community Services and Development; Don M. Myers, Assistant County Administrator for Management Services; Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney, Mary H. Allen, Clerk to _ the Board; Anne Marie Fedder, Information Officer 003 ~. ~__ .T~-.~___..~___._,.._..._..~..._._.e. ____.~__...__.___-.~.-~~,_.~ ~~~ - AY~~ : Supervisors Johnson, Nickens NAYS: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Robers The motion to nominate Supervisor McGraw was carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Johnson, McGraw, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None IN RE: EXECUTIVE SESSION Supervisor Robers moved to go into Executive Session pursuant to the Code of Virginia 3.1-344 (A) (1) to consider appointments of specific public officers, members of the Board of Supervisors to various committees, commission and boards. The motion was seconded by Supervisor McGraw and was defeated by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw NAYS: Supervisors Johnson, Nickens, Robers IN RE: ORGANIZATION OF COUNTY BOARD (CONTINUED) 2 Length of Term for Chairman and Vice Chairman Supervisor Johnson moved to set the terms of Chairman and VIce Chairman for one year beginning January 3, 1990 and ending January 3, 1991. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Nickens and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Johnson, McGraw, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None 005 Tuesday, April 10, 1990 at 3:00 p.m. Tuesday, April 24, 1990 at 3:00 p.m. and 7:00 p.m. Tuesday, May 8, 1990 at 3:00 p.m. Tuesday, May 22, 1990 at 3:00 p.m. and 7:00 p.m. Tuesday, June 12, 1990 at 3:00 p.m. Tuesday, June 26, 1990 at 3:00 p.m. and 7:00 p.m. Tuesday, July 10, 1990 at 3:00 p.m. Tuesday, July 24, 1990 at 3:00 p.m. and 7:00 p.m. Tuesday, August 14, 1990 at 3:00 p.m. Tuesday, August 28, 1990 at 3:00 p.m. and 7:00 p.m. Wednesday, September 12, 1990 at 3:00 p.m. Tuesday, September 25, 1990 at 3:00 p.m. and 7:00 p.m. Tuesday, October 9, 1990 at 3:00 p.m. Tuesday, October 23, 1990 at 3:00 p.m. and 7:00 p.m. Wednesday November 14, 1990 at 3:00 p.m. and 7:00 p.m. Tuesday, December 4, 1990 at 3:00 p.m. Tuesday, December 18, 1990 at 3:00 p.m. and 7:00 p.m. 2. That the organizational meeting for 1991 shall be held on Thursday, January 3, 1991 at 9:00 a.m. 3. That the rules of parliamentary procedure for the conduct of all Board meetings shall be Robert's Rules of Order; provided however, these rules are amended as follows: a. that - n- no second to motions shall be required in order to consider that motion; and b. that the chairman may make motions, eeeend met~ene; participate in debate and vote on all matters considered by the Board. On motion of Supervisor Eddy, seconded by Supervisor McGraw as amended, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Robers oo~ Robers. the Consolidation Negotiation Committee filled by Supervisor Eddy, the Resource Authority filled by Supervisors Nickens, Johnson and Eddy, Fifth .Planning District Commission filled by Supervisor Eddy and Airport Commission filled by Supervisor Robers. Supervisor Johnson asked that the issues be separated for a separate vote on each appointment. County Attorney Paul Mahoney advised that the governing body must remove the present commissioner on the Airport Commission before appointing another commissioner. The following appointments were made: State Emergency Services: Supervisor Johnson moved to nominate Supervisor Robers. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Johnson, McGraw, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None Regional Partnership: Supervisor Johnson moved to nominate Supervisor Robers. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Johnson, McGraw, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None Social Services Board: Supervisor McGraw moved to nominate Supervisor Nickens to a four-year term expiring 12/31/93. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Johnson, McGraw, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None ABSTAIN: Supervisor Nickens Opg NAYS: None Regional Airport Commission: Supervisor Eddy advised that he felt that a sitting member of the Board of Supervisors should be appointed to this commission and moved that Lee Garrett be removed from the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission and that the County express its gratitude to him for his service. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisor Eddy, McGraw, Nickens, Robers NAYS: Supervisor Johnson Supervisor Eddy moved that Supervisor Robers be named to replace Mr. Garrett's unexpired term which will expire February 10, 1991. There was a discussion on the merits of placing a business person with expertise in the operation of the airport in the future and asking the City of Roanoke to consider making the same type of appointment. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisor Eddy, Johnson, McGraw, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None 5. Ratification of 1990 Holiday Schedule Supervisor McGraw moved to ratify the schedule with the addition of December 24, 1990 Supervisor Eddy offered a substitute motion to ratify the schedule deleting the words "any day appointed by the Governor or State of Virginia". Director of Human Resources Keith Cook advised that this change could impact the employees in 01~ IN RE: NEW BUSINESS 1 Report from Total Action against Poverty on recovery efforts Ted Edlich, Executive Director of TAP was present and reviewed the efforts made to bring the programs back into operation after a fire destroyed the building. He introduced Alvin Nash, Director of the Southwest Virginia Food Bank, who requested support from the Board of Supervisors to store their food at the Public Service Center. Assistant County Administrator John Chambliss described the facilities that the County can make available to TAP for its food bank. Supervisor Nickens moved to authorize the County Administrator to work with TAP to assure that the necessary space is available and to execute the necessary documents. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Johnson, McGraw, Nickens Robers NAYS: None 2 Report on Recovery efforts of Shenandoah Homes The Reverend Otis Burgher was present. He expressed appreciation to all the County personnel who were involved in the rescue and firefighting efforts at Shenandoah Homes. He described the recovery efforts and advised that Shenandoah Homes hopes to purchase a sprinkler system at an approximate cost of ACTION # A-12390-6.a ITEM NUMBER L-'3 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE January 23, 1990 SUBJECT: Confirmation of Committee Appointments to the the Mental Health Services of the Roanoke Valley Community Services Board, Library Board and Transportation and Safety Commission COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The following nominations have been made and must now be confirmed by the Board of Supervisors. The nominee has agreed to serve. Library Board Supervisor Johnson has nominated Dr. Norma Jean Peters to serve another four-year term representing the Hollins Magisterial District. Her term will expire December 31, 1993. Mental Health Services of the Roanoke Valley Community Services Board Supervisor Eddy has nominated the ratification of the Rev. Clay Turner to serve as an at-large member. His three-year term will expire on December 31, 1992. Reverend Turner's appointment must also be ratified by the five participating governing bodies. Transportation and Safety Commission Supervisor Eddy has nominated Henry Gregory to serve the unexpired term of May Johnson. The term will expire January 1, 1992. SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: ~'~~~ Mary H. lien Elmer C. Hodge Clerk to the Board County Administrator L3 ------------------------------------------------ ACTION VOTE Approved (x) Motion by: Harry C. Nickens Yes No Abs Denied ( ) Eddy x Received ( ) Johnson x Referred McGraw x To• Nickens x Robers x cc: File Library Board File Mental Health Services of the Roanoke Valley Community Services Board File Transportation and Safety Commission File ~/--/ COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA CAPITAL FUND UNAPPROPRIATED BALANCE Beginning Balance at July 1, 1989 $ 89,608 September 12, 1989 Contribution towards Hollins Fire Truck 25 000 Balance as of January 23, 1990 64 608 Submitted by Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance November 15, 1989 November 28, 1989 December 19, 1989 December 19, 1989 December 19, 1989 January 9, 1990 COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA GENERAL FUND UNAPPROPRIATED BALANCE Balance at July 1, 1989 Dental Insurance Drainage Projects Library Automation Drainage Engineer Bushdale Road Right of Way Hurrican Hugo Expenses Balance as of January 23, 1990 Submitted by Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance $4,483,543 (106,980) (180,000) (300,000) (35,000) (15,000) 109 000 3 737 563 On December 19, 1989, the Board of Supervisors adopted a goal statement to maintain the General Fund Unappropriated Balance at a minimum of 6.25% of General Fund expenditures, which is $3,948,000. /~- 3 June 14, 1989 July 11, 1989 July 11, 1989 July 25, 1989 August 8, 1989 COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA RESERVE FOR BOARD CONTINGENCY Beginning Balance at July 1, 1989 Additional Amount from 1989-90 Budget Contribution to Va. Amateur Sports Purchase of drainage easement Option on 200 acres real estate Donation to Julian Wise Foundation County supplement for new position in Sheriffs Department August 22, 1989 Part time volunteer coordinator August 22, 1989 Public Information for Police Department referendum November 28, 1989 Stormwater Feasibility Study December 22, 1989 Copy machine rental for Treasurer's Office (Administratively approved) December 29, 1989 Car phones for Rescue personnel (Administratively approved) Balance as of January 23, 1990 Submitted by Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance $11,395 50,000 (25,000) (5,000) (3,750) (5,000) (869) (5,800) (9,000) (3,382) (2,415) 1045 X134 N-~' COUNTY OF ROANO%6 INCONB ANALYSIS GENERAL OPERATING FDND 1388-99 TA%ES-REAL ESTATB TAYES-PERSONAL PROPERTY OTHER PROPERTY TA%ES SALES TA% BUSINESS LICENSE AUTO DECALS OTREA LOCAL TA%ES DOG TAGS ZONING FEES BUILDING FEES OTflBR PBRNIT, FBES A LICENSES FINES AND FORFEITURES SALES A USE OF EQUIPNENT A SUPPLIES '~ GARAGES FOR SERVICES RECOVERED C05T-LOCAL ABC PROFITS %~ COgNONWBALTH'S ATTOANBY BIPENSBS SRHRIFF'S B%PENSES CONNISSIONER OF TflE REVENUE'S B%PENSES '~ TRBASURBR'S EZPENSES WBLFARB GRANT LIBRARY GRANT ~~ OTBER STATE RBVENUE NON-REVSNUB AHCBIPT TRANSFBR FROM OTflEA FUNDS ~' ~' a ACTUAL ACTJAL 6-30-89 12-31-88 BUDGET (12 NONTflS) (6 NONTHS) S 25,780,009 27,092,820 12,980,652 10,200,000 11,667,171 458,255 1,257,293 1,323,377 1,216,253 4,390,492 3,841,459 1,627,606 2,400,000 2,182,735 115,617 1,150,000 1,283,174 82,290 4,015,220 3,700,237 1,469,582 18,000 14,963 3,889 15,000 25,426 13,323 345,000 321,549 152,974 11,282 31,525 17,611 162,000 209,125 111,834. p 151 150 150,510 162,774 77,718 504,029 558,006 343,966 _. _ 230,045 185,794 78,021 260,503 225,382 104,421 3,170,000 3,255,067 1,014,Q81 179,485 147,593 58,881 111,853 168,125 65,864 1,961,441 1,593,546 610,812 . 175,000 174,860 67,430 286,803 239,336 116,208 5,035 6,52C 290,907 0 p 0 57,439,000 58,411,315 21,098,571 BBGINNING BALANCE USED TO BALANCE 091,702 4 0 2,362,291 COSTS OF OPERATIONS TENPO&ARY LOANS A LBASB PORCHASE PAOCBEDS , 765,000 559,130 U BOND PROCEEDS _ _ _ _________ ____________ S 62,295,708 $ 58,970,448 S 23,460,862 t SPECIAL CONSIDERATION ADDED TO BASIC CONPUTATION 1989-90 PR0IECTIONS ------------ ------------------------------- ACTUAL ANNUALIZED VARIANCE 12-31-69 BASED ON OVER (UNDER) x BUDGEt (6 NONTES) x 12 NONTRS BUDGET - ---------- - ---------- ---- ------ - - 50 3 28,511,770 14,014,158 49 29,173,000 # 5661,230 4 11,668,447 736,799 6 12,500,000 # 831,553 97 1,435,000 1,342,359 94 1,460,590 25,590 37 4,200,000 1,787,443 43 4,216,705 18,705 5 2,100,000 89,061 4 2,200,000 = 100,000 7 1,325,000 81,399 6 1,269,280 (55,720) 37 4,180,000 1,584,451 38 3,989,192 (190,808) 22 15,500 3,005 19 11,562 (3,9381 gg 10,500 12,137 116 23,163 12,663 44 408,611 195,145 48 410,192 1,581 157 7,250 11,099 153 19,801 12,551 69 165,000 65,944 40 123,313 (41,687) 0 0 1,563 0 1,573 1,573 52 160,401 61,822 39 129,481 (30,920) 6g 554,643 26T,191 48 433,456 (121,187) 34 200,000 80,008 40 190,526 (9,474) 40 251,670 80,458 32 174,123 (77,547) 27 3,837,277 1,364,068 36 4,318,479 541,202 33 180,000 55,854 31 139,991 (40,009) 38 180,000 53,676 30 137,014 (42,986) 31 .,_,2,067,474 672,291 33 1,753,766 (313,708) 50 175,000 67,566 50 175,132 I32 41 245,000 188,283 1T 380'3 6 ~ 145,305 5,718 6 7,335 0 0 16,000 16,000 0 16,000 ------------ -- ------------ ---- ---------- ------------ 31 61,894,543 22,859,121 3T 63,321,421 1,426,878 58 3,365,847 0 0 3,365,847 0 0 p 0 0 0 0 0 202,168 0 0 202,168 # 0 - ------------ ----- ------------ ------------ - -- .- _-_-18-5 65,462,558 S _22,859,121 S -35 -66,889,436- --1,426,878 --- - - -- --- - - -- - -- --- ----- -- - --- - ----- ------- - -- i~~ COUNTY OF ROANOgE STATEMENT OF ~XPENDIT'JRES SIX !40NTBS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1389 -- BUDGET ---------- -- BXPBNDED ---------- --- x --------- GENERAL ADMINISTPATION # 679 $ 176 ~ 95,0,0 54 BOAP.D OF SUPERVISORS , 258 6fi8 111,865 43 CGUNT7 A:;Mi`IISTRATOA ~ 24' "69 "~ 330 ' 48 ?EASOtiNEL cauNTY ATTCANEY ''3„ ~~~, ~= ~? 038 ' 50 45 COKHISSIONEA OF RE'isNU"s 513 "13 042 506 230,43 874 227 45 TREASURER , 163,012 , 85,732 53 ELECTIONS p 11 0 SESQUICENTENNIAL FISCAL MANAGEME;~T ASST. CO ADM. MANAGEMENT SERVICES 69,621 31,181 45 44 COUNTY ASSESSOR 642,557 692 387 283,283 298,082 77 CENTRAL ACCOUNTING , 218,274 104,286 48 PROCUREMENT 572 128 45,899 36 MANAGEMENT &. BUDGET , 130,316 1 696,683 62 RISE MANAGEMENT , JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION 118,133 10,629 9 CIRCUIT COURT 204 20 5,229 26 GENERAL DISTRICT COURT , 730 167 23 MAGiSTAATES 758 11 5,739 49 J ~ D DISTRICT COURT , 653 516 225,385 44 CLBRg OF CIRCUIT COURT ' , 279 312 148,259 - 47 S ATTORNEY COMMONWEALTg , 175 44 11,411 26 PROBATION OFFICE , 6,610 1,274 19 VICTIM WITNESS PUBLIC SAFETY POLICING A INVESTIGATING 4,215,118 1,924,185 4fi 6 MIGBWAY SAFETY COMMISSION 960 2,099,120 60 979,197 4T FIRE 458,759 261,715 57 RESCUE SQUAD EMERGENCY SERVICES A 3AZ HAT RESPONSE 42,535 17,785 42 50 CONr""INEMENTICARE OF PF.ISONERS 2,018,249 1,001,358 54 ANIMAL CONTROL 154,044 p 89,354 1,634 RAZ-MAT RESPONSE 0 105,992 RUGO DISASTER RECOVERY COMMUNITY SERVICES AND DEVELOPMENT FOR COMM. SERVICES A DEVELOPM CO ADM ASS EA 46 . . 719,513 387,394 54 ENGINEERING 870 208 99,185 47 GBNBRAL SERVICES , 204 832 324,037 39 BUILDINGS MAINTENANCE , 324 890 454,568 46 PARgS ~ RBCRBATION , 1,599,749 773,562 48 REFUSB PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION 65,400 092 24,541 435 513 38 56 GROUNDS MAINTENANCE 932, , jY,. / COUNTY OF ROANOgE STATEMENT OF EXPENDITURES SIX MCNTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1989 HEALTH b. SOCIAL SERVICES 899 425 20',289 48 PUBLIC HEALTH SOCIAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION , 1,840,244 838,141 46 46 PUBLIC ASSISTANCE 954,030 000 35 439,902 13,488 3T INSTITUTIONAL CARE SOCIAL SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS , °4,'84 4T,~92 ~0 DEy'ELCP"!LENT 553 311 140,021 45 PLANNING A ZCNING , 530 264 165,857 63 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT , 002 134 63,096 4T DEVELOPMENT REVIEYI , 695 18 8,468 45 PLANNING COMMISSION CONSTRUCTION BUILDING SERVICES , 262,342 125,304 48 NON-DEPARTMENTAL ASST. CO. ADM. HUMAN SERVICES LIBRARY EXTENSION k CONTINUING EDUCATION EMPLOYEB BENEFITS CONTRIBUTIONS TO SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS MISCELLANEOUS CONSOLIDATION 97,675 43,983 45 1,147,333 508,383 44 104,694 22,716 22 759,298 67,862 9 30,000 19,200 64 867,430 116,979 13 200,000 27,251 14 TOTAL TRANSFERS AND P.ESERVES REIMBURSABLE EXPENDITURES TRANSFER TO DEBT SERVICE TRANSFER TO INTERNAL SERVICE TAANSFBR TO SCHOOL OPERATING FUND TRANSFER TO SE',4ER FUND TRANSFER TO UTILITY CAPITAL TRANSFER TO CAPITAL PR0IECTS TRANSFER TO YOUTH HAVEN TRANSFER TO GARAGE II UNAPPROPRIATED BALANCE RESERVE FOR BOARD CONTINGENCY TOTAL TRANSFER iT.EMS GRAND TOTAL 27,664,485 12,694,415 46 ----------- ------------ ----------- 0 1544) 0 5,668,360 2,539,617 45 339,804 152,916 45 28,637,950 8,325,068 2° 40,000 20,000 50 525,000 262,500 50 358,783 179,392 50 78,658 39,329 50 120,000 0 0 2,D22,25D a 0 a 0 7,266 37,798,071 11,51$,278 30 ----------- ------------ ----------- ~ 65,462,556 ~ 24,212,693 37 ACTION # ITEM NUMBER ~ "' ~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: January 23, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: Accounts Paid -December 1989 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Payments to Vendors: Payroll: 12/8/89 $ 404,535.43 12/22/89 413.088.83 $2,381,372.62 817 624.26 3.198,996.88 A detailed listing of the payments is on file with the Clerk to the Board of Supervisors. SUBMITTED BY: Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance APPROVED: Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To Motion by: Eddy Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JANUARY 23, 1990 RESOLUTION CERTIFYING EXECUTIVE MEETING WAS HELD IN CONFORMITY WITH THE CODE OF VIRGINIA WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia has convened an executive meeting on this date pursuant to an affirmative recorded vote and in accordance with the provisions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and WHEREAS, Section 2.1-344.1 of the Code of Virginia requires a certification by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia that such executive meeting was conducted in conformity with Virginia Law. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia hereby certifies that, to the best of each members knowledge: 1. Only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements by Virginia law were discussed in the executive meeting which this certification resolution applies, and 2. Only such public business matters as were identified in the motion convening the executive meeting were heard, discussed or considered by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. ~q~--. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARS COUNTYEADMINISTRATION CENTER~NTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANJANUARY 23, 1990 TUESDAY, ORDINANCE 12390-7 AMENDING CHAPTER 8, "EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL" OF THE ROANORE~CONTROL CODE BY AMENDING SECTTOON pROVIDE~ FOR THE MEASURES GENERALLY" ADOPTION OF STORMWATER MANAGEMENT CRITERIA WHEREAS, the adoption of more stringent criteria to regulate stormwater management is authorized by Section 10.1-562 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended; and WHEREAS, notice of the County's intention to adopt an amendment to its erosion and sediment control ordinance was duly advertised in the Roanoke Times and World News on October 10, 1989, 1989; and October 17, 1989, December 5, 1989, and December 12, WHEREAS, the first reading on this ordinance was held on October 10, 1989; the second reading and public hearing were held on January 23, 1990. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That Chapter 8, "Erosion and Sediment Control" of the Roanoke County Code be, and hereby is, amended and reenacted by amending Section 8-11(a) to read and provide as follows: Sec. 8-11. Control measures generally. (a) Practices for erosion and sediment control in the county shall meet or exceed the standards and specifications contained in Part III, as the Virginia Erosion and Sediment Control Handbook, published and amended through March 8, 1983, in haec verba and the Code of Virginia, as amended, through such date, except for those '# . _~ . r 1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, JANUARY 23, 1990 RESOLUTION 12390-8 ADOPTING A NEW SECTION OF THE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS MANUAL ENTITLED "STORMWATER MANAGEMENT CRITERIA'S WHEREAS, the Department of Development is in the process of preparing a manual to assist the public, and especially the development community, for clarification of rules, regulations, and policies applicable to land development in Roanoke County; and WHEREAS, a Design and Construction Standards Committee composed of area engineers, surveyors, members of the Roanoke Valley Homebuilders Association, and County staff was assembled to develop the content of the manual and the design standards; and WHEREAS, it was the consensus of the committee to address the areas of water, sewer, street and parking, and stormwater management in the manual; and WHEREAS, at its meeting on February 14, 1989, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, by resolution, adopted a manual of regulations and policies entitled "Design and Construction Standards Manual" to assist the public in the clarification and interpretation of rules, regulations, and policies applicable to land development in Roanoke County, and in particular, the areas of water, sewer, street and parking; and WHEREAS, the water design standards, street and parking design standards and specifications, and subdivision approval for on-site sewage disposal and well systems standards chapters of the manual have been previously completed and adopted. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, does hereby adopt the fourth component of the Design and Construction Standards Manual entitled "Stormwater Management Criteria" which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Further the section of the manual concerning "10 Year Design Requirements" shall be in full force and effect from and after January 23, 1990, and the stormwater management criteria shall apply to all plans which have not been approved by the Department of Development and Inspection on or before January 23, 1990. The "10 and 25 Year Design Requirements" shall be in full force and effect from and after March 23, 1990. These stormwater management criteria shall apply to all plans which have not been approved by the Department of Development and Inspection on or before March 23, 1990. On motion of Supervisor Eddy to adopt resolution with improved wording in the manual, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Robers NAYS: Supervisor Nickens A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Development & Inspections Phillip Henry, Director, Engineering Cliff Craig, Director, Utilities Terry Harrington, Director, Planning John Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator Paul Mahoney, County Attorney ACTION # ITEM NUMBER ~9 O-~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE_ January 2S, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: Grdinance amending Chapter 8, "Erosion and Sediment Control" of the Roanoke County Code by amending Section 8-11(a) "Control Measures Generally", to provide for the adoption of Stormwater Management Criteria, and a Resolution adopting a new section of the Design and Construction Standards Manual entitled "Stormwater Management Criteria". COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: /~ ~~ ~ d ,. y >/ sue. ~ ~ J l 2 -L--L'.r. -v't (,,;..4 y~~, i'~.a-~L' ~; l~La. /(.< t-~ , , G°°°.-t..2,^L...:.,}~°<- ~~ L ,.~.y,'~:: ;.,~' BACKGROUND On October 24, 1989, the County Staff presented to the Board of Supervisors the proposed standards for Storm Water Management. At that time, there were three issues to be resolved between the County Staff and the Roanoke Valley Homebuilders. Since the first presentation, a compromise has been reached. The Roanoke County Staff, with the support of the Roanoke Valley Homebuilders, offer the following changes to the proposed standards. i. Section 502 00 - be rewritten to change the 10 and 50 year design requirements to 10 and 25 year design requirements for all sites. {refer to attached sheets) 2. Section 502_.03-1_=Waivers - this is to remain as written since this is an Amendment to the Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinance, the titles and procedures should remain consistent with the present Ordinance. (refer to attached sheets) /9~-I 3. Section 506.01 - Maintenance of Stormwater Management Fac i 1 i ti es i n__S_i_ng 1 e__Fami 1 y , Townhouse and Condominium D_e_vel~ments - require a Homeowners Association, or Property Manager, to be responsible. (refer to attached sheet) 4. Implementation of_the_standards - it was agreed upon that the 10 year frequency storm design would be effective immediate 1 y and the design to meet the 10 and 25 year frequency storms would become effective 60 days later. SUMMARY_OF_.INFORMATION Two separate actions by the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will be required: 1. Adoption of Ordinance amending the Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinance. 2. Adoption of a Resolution adding a new section to the Design and Construction Standards Manual. The First Reading was held on October 10, 1989; the Public Hearing and Second Reading is scheduled for January 23, 1990. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the proposed Amendments to the Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinance and Resolution incorporating the "Stormwater Management Criteria" in the Design and Construction Standards Manual, be adopted. The Amendments, Additions, and Reenactments shall be in full force and effect, from and after January 23, 1990, and the effective date of this Ordinance and Stormwater Management Criteria for the Design and Construction Standards Manual shall apply to plans, which have riot received final approval, as follows: The 10 year design requirements shall be in full force and effect from ar'd after January 23, 1990. The "10 and 25 year design requirements" of said Manual shall in force and effect from and after March 23, 1990. ITTED BY: ~ / ` J -"1~ t~t~yL~ Arnold Covey Development Director and Insbections APPROVED BY: ~.` '~ r Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator 9v-I Approved Denied Received Referred To Motion by: ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs Eddy __ Johnson __ _____ McGraw __ _ N i c k e n s ___ ______ Robers /90-/ 502.00 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REQUIREMENT All subdivisions and developments requiring a site development plan occurring within the County shall, as a minimum, either have on-site for provide off-site stormwater management facilities) adequate to control increased runoff generated by postdevelopment 10-year frequency storms, to the runoff rate generated by predeveloped 2-year frequency storm conditions, and in addition reduce runoff rate generated by a postdevelopment 25-year frequency storms to the runoff rate generated by a predeveloped 10-year frequency storm. The discharge criteria for both designs shall be meet at all times. The point of stormwater discharge from the development shall be to a channel. No application for a preliminary or final plan of subdivision nor shall any site development plan be approved unless it includes an acceptable plan describing the manner in which erosion, sediment, and stormwater resulting from the development will be controlled or managed. This plan shall indicate whether stormwater will be managed on-site or off-site, ~; 1 ~~ -1 For purposes. of clarity and administrative efficiency, the following conditions shall apply to these guidelines and the resultant plans developed under them: 1. Building on or resurfacing an existing impervious area shall not require stormwater management nor shall it be included as an additional impervious area. 2. Impervious area calculations for buildings shall include all overhanging projections such as eaves, canopies and porticoes. 502.03.1 WAIVER CRITERIA: The Director shall evaluate all requests for waivers against the following criteria. No waiver shall be granted unless the Director certifies in writing that the proposed development meets at least one of the following criteria. Prior to making any such determination, the Director may require that the landowner/developer's Engineer provide any information necessary to making such a determination. A waiver request of stormwater management will be evaluated based on the following conditions: ~' 1. The hydraulic characteristics of the receiving stream or the environmental characteristics of the stream or the site are such that on-site management or detention of flows are contrary to sound engineering practices or detrimental to the environment= - - ~ "~ '~ '" ~" 15 1 ~1~~-I 2. The increased amount of quantity or velocity of stormwater generated by the development will have a minor effect on the receiving stream1 502.03.2 WAIVER REQUESTS: Each request for waiver will be considered individually by the Director. All applications for a waiver will receive a written response outlining the reasons for approval, or denial, of the application within 30 days of receipt of all information requested by the Director. In reviewing the waiver application, all storm drainage outfalls, receiving channels and channel capacities, velocities and other related storm drainage discharge considerations the Director shall closely examine to determine the need for additional outfall treatment and/or channel protection needs. Further, the developer's professional engineer shall furnish the Director a "Declaration of Adequacy" prior to granting a stormwater management waiver when adequacy of the receiving channel is in question. 502.04 REQUIREMENT FOR PRO RATA SHARE CONTRIBUTION: - reserved 502.05 PRO RATA SHARE VALUES - reserved 502.05.1 Reserved 502.05.2 Reserved 502.05.3 Reserved 502.06 RIGHT-OF-WAY stormwater management systems for certain types of development designed in or adjacent to the road right-of-way will 16 fqo-~ 506.00 MAINTENANCE OF STORM DRAINAGE AND STORMWATER MANAGEMENT Easements shall be dedicated to public use during the land development process when the topography and the natural drainageways are altered. Drainage easements are required for the ~saintenance of, storm sewer systems, open channels as Sefined by the Virginia 8rosion and Sediment Control Handbook, improved drainageways of increased concentrated runoff and for stormwater management facilities. Access easements are necessary for emergency public-access to maintain a drainageway or storm sewer system located on private property. Furthermore, drainage easements_are,.intended to .restrict private property owners from disturbing land contained in the easement in such a manner as to alter the drainageway to the detriment of neighbors upstream or downstream. Similarly, easements for underground pipes assure that no .other permanent structures will be allowed therein. The purpose of this section is to define the responsibility for the maintenance of storm drainage and stormwater management facilities located in the easements dedicated to public use. Public maintenance responsibility will not be accepted for retention facilities with a permanent pool, or underground storage tanks. 506 ~ O1 SINGLE • FA1kiILY,. TOWNHO[75~, ANn :L'0~3DJf~?NIOM DEVELOPMENTS: - ~ ' - The maintenance of stormwater management facilities located in a properly dedicated public easement will be the responsibility of the•Homeowners• Association or prgperty manager. ~ 4 .:.. . - r The storm drainage system, also located in a properl dedicated ~~ ~~~ Y public easement, shall be maintained by the Homeowners' Association, or property manager. Roanoke County's Department of Development and Inspections may accept maintenance responsibility for stormwater management or storm drainage facilities which are in open common areas with adequate access capabilities and are not located in or under paved areas. Situations such as these will be considered on an individual basis. The following note shall be added to the easement Plat: "The Homeowners' Association or property manager of this development shall assume the maintenance responsibility of the storm drainage system and of the stormwater management facility located therein, and contained within an easement properly dedicated to public use." The note may be modified where maintenance of the storm sewer system is accepted by the County. 506.02 OFFICES, SHOPPING CENTERS, RENTAL MULTIFAMILY DWELLINGS, MOBILE HOME PARRS, COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL DEVELOPMENT: For maintenance of storm drainage systems and stormwater management facilities located in commercial, office, industrial, rental multifamily dwellings, mobile home parks or similar uses, the following note should be added to the Plat: "The owner of fee title to the property on which an easement is shown is responsible for maintenance of the storm drainage or stormwater management facilities located therein." 30 1 ~~~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, JANUARY 23, 1990 ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 8, "EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL" OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE BY AMENDING SECTION 8-11(a), "CONTROL MEASURES GENERALLY" TO PROVIDE FOR THE ADOPTION OF STORMWATER MANAGEMENT CRITERIA WHEREAS, the adoption of more stringent criteria to regulate stormwater management is authorized by Section 10.1-562 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended; and WHEREAS, notice of the County's intention to adopt an amendment to its erosion and sediment control ordinance was duly advertised in the Roanoke Times and World News on October 10, 1989, October 17, 1989, December 5, 1989, and Deceeber 12, 1989; and WHEREAS, the first reading on this ordinance was held on October 10, 1989; the second reading and public hearing were held on January 23, 1990. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That Chapter 8, "Erosion and Sediment Control" of the Roanoke County Code be, and hereby is, amended and reenacted by amending Section 8-11(a) to read and provide as follows: Sec. 8-11. Control measures generally. (a) Practices for erosion and sediment control in the county shall meet or exceed the standards and specifications contained in the Virginia Erosion and Sediment Control Handbook, Part III, as published and amended through March 8, 1983, in haec verba and the Code of Virginia, as amended, through such date, except for those more stringent local stormwater management criteria which the Board ~ ~~-~ of Suuervisors of Roanoke County Virginia may adopt by resolution and incorporate into the manual of regulations and policies entitled " Desi n and Construction Standards Manual." 2. That these amendments, additions, and reenactments shall be in full force and effect from and after January 23, 1990, and that the effective date for this ordinance and the section of the "Design and Construction Standards Manual" concerning "10 Year Design Requirements" shall be in full force and effect from and after January 23, 1990. The "10 and 25 Year Design Requirements" of said Manual shall be in force and effect from and after March 23, 1990. ~~~-~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, JANUARY 23, 1990 RESOLUTION ADOPTING A NEW SECTION OF THE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS MANUAL ENTITLED "STORMWATER MANAGEMENT CRITERIA" WHEREAS, the Department of Development is in the process of preparing a manual to assist the public, and especially the development community, for clarification of rules, regulations, and policies applicable to land development in Roanoke County; and WHEREAS, a Design and Construction Standards Committee composed of area engineers, surveyors, members of the Roanoke Valley Homebuilders Association, and County staff was assembled to develop the content of the manual and the design standards; and WHEREAS, it was the consensus of the committee to address the areas of water, sewer, street and parking, and stormwater management in the manual; and WHEREAS, at its meeting on February 14, 1989, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, by resolution, adopted a manual of regulations and policies entitled "Design and Construction Standards Manual" to assist the public in the clarification and interpretation of rules, regulations, and policies applicable to land development in Roanoke County, and in particular, the areas of water, sewer, street and parking; and WHEREAS, the water design standards, street and parking design standards and specifications, and subdivision approval for on-site sewage disposal and well systems standards chapters of the manual have been previously completed and adopted. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved that the Board of Supervisors . ~ "'~ of Roanoke County, Virginia, does hereby adopt the fourth component of the Design and Construction Standards Manual entitled "Stormwater Management Criteria" which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Further the section of the manual concerning "10 Year Design Requirements" shall be in full force and effect from and after January 23, 1990, and the stormwater management criteria shall apply to all plans which have not been approved by the Department of Development and Inspection on or before January 23, 1990. The "10 and 25 Year Design Requirements" shall be in full force and effect from and after March 23, 1990. These stormwater management criteria shall apply to all plans which have not been approved by the Department of Development and Inspection on or before March 23, 1990. SECTION 500.00 500.01 501.00 502.00 502.01 502.02 502.03 502.03.1 502.03.2 502.03.3 502.04 502.05 502.05.1 501.05.2 501.05.3 502.06 502.07 502.08 502.09 502.10 502.11 502.12 503.00 503.01 503.02 503.03 503.04 504.00 505.00 506.00 506.01 506.02 ~~ ~~~ ""~ FOR DtSCUSStt?~'~ OS~~~ TABLE OF CONTENTS SIJ~JEGT FOR RSV ~ ~ to as Stormwater Management Criteria DAB REVISION -PAGE Stormwater Management Criteria Purpose .............................. Definitions .......................... Stormwater Management Requirements... General Requirements ................. Exemptions ........................... Waivers .............................. Development Categories ............... Waiver Criteria ...................... Waiver Requests ...................... Pro Rata Share - reserved............ Pro Rata Share Values - reserved..... Reserved ............................. Reserved ............................. Reserved ............................. Right-of-way ......................... Easement........... .. .......... Final Plans - Subdivision/site....... Basic Criteria designing facility.... Final Plans - Stormwater Management.. Modifications ........................ Fencing .............................. General Requirements for Site Gradin Plans ................................ Building permits ..................... Legend ............................... Policy Statement .................... Townhouse Projects ................... Conflicting Provisions Policy ....... Warning - Areas Outside Flood Hazard District ............................ Maintenance of .Storm Drainage and Management Systems ................... Single Family, Townhouses, and Condo Developments ......................... Office, Shopping Centers, Rental Multi- Family, Mobile Home Parks, etc....... Appendix 1 2-10 11-12 12 12-13 13 13-15 15-16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16-17 17 17 17-18 18-20 20 20-21 22-24 24 24 24-25 25-26 27 28 29 29-30 30 500.00 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT CRITERIA 500.01 PURPOSE 1. Inhibit the deterioration of existing waters and waterways by requiring a Stormwater Management Plan to maintain postdevelopment runoff characteristics, as nearly as practicable, equal to, or better, than the predevelopment runoff characteristics. 2. Establish minimum acceptable administrative procedures that must be met by all Stormwater Plans. 3. Require the provision of long term responsibility for and maintenance of stormwater management control devices. 4. Develop Design Standards which will assist the public, and specifically the development community, for clarification to regulations and policies which apply to land development in Roanoke County. 1 501.00 DEFINITIONS For the purpose of the Ordinance, the following terms are defined: ACRE-FOOT - Volume of water that would cover 1 acre to a depth of 1 foot. An acre-foot contains 43,560 cubic feet. ADEQUATE CHANNEL - Manmade channel or pipe which is capable of conveying the runoff from a 10-year storm, without overtopping its banks or eroding natural channel capable of conveying the runoff from a 2-year storm without overtopping its banks or eroding the channel lining. APPROACH CHANNEL - The reach of channel upstream from a dam, bridge, constriction, culvert, or other structures. APRON - A floor or lining of concrete to protect a surface from erosion, such as the pavement at the outlet of culverts or storm sewers. BACKWATER - (a) A flow retarding influence due to a dam, other constrictions such as a bridge or culvert, or another stream; (b) the increase in water surface 2 elevation due to a constriction above the normal unconstricted elevation. BACKWATER CURVE - A particular form of the surface curve of a stream of water which. is concave upward. It is caused by an obstruction in the channel such as an overflow dam: the depth is greater at all points than Belanger's critical and normal depths; and the velocities diminish downstream. The term is used in a generic sense to denote all water surface curves. BRIDGE - A structure erected over a watercourse, depression, or obstacle. As distinguished from a culvert it is a large structure spanning a watercourse, the bed of which is left comparatively undisturbed. The opening width is generally large compared to length (in the direction of flow). The structure generally consists of a deck or superstructure supported on two or more abutments or piers. CHANNEL - An elongated depression which has a definite bed and bank which serves to confine the water, either naturally or artificially created, and of appreciable size, which periodically or continuously contains moving water, or which forms a connecting link between two bodies of water. COEFFICENT OF ROUGHNESS - A roughness factor in the Kutter, Manning tn), Hazen and other formulas 3 expressing the character of a channel as affecting the friction factor of water flowing therein. CONDUIT - A general term for any facility intended for the conveyance of water, whether open or closed. r'(IAtTR(1T. - SF.~TION - A section or a reach of a conduit where conditions exist that make the water level a stable index of discharge. A control may be partial or complete. A complete control is independent of downstream conditions and is effective at all stages. An overflow dam, a rock ledge crossing a channel, or a boulder-covered reach, are examples. Controls may be either natural or artificial. CREST - (a) The top of a dam, dike, spillway, or weir; frequently restricted to the overflow portion: (b) the summit of a wave, peak of a flood. CRITICAL DEPTH - The lowest depth which the water surface can attain in the natural process of dissipating energy. Critical depth corresponds to the lowest possible energy content of the falling liquid. CULVERT - A culvert is a closed conduit of waterway carrying water through a highway or railroad embankment. A culvert is distinguished from a bridge by certain characteristics, such as (a) a culvert generally has the same material all around its perimeter, and has a regular, symmetrical shape; (b) a culvert usually has a large ratio of length to width. 4 DROP - (a) A structure for the vertical or inclined dropping of water in a conduit to a lower level and dissipating its surplus energy. (b) The drop or fall water surface elevation between the upstream and downstream (between headwater and tail water) sides of a bridge construction or submerged culvert, or between two sections of a slope reach. ENERGY - In a stream the total energy at any section is represented by the sum of its potential and kinetic energies. ENERGY GRADIENT - The slope of the energy line with reference to a specified plane. ENERGY HEAD - The elevation of the hydraulic grade line at any section plus the velocity head of the mean velocity of the flow in that section. The energy head may be referred to any datum, or to an inclined plane, such as the bed of a conduit. Total head above datum at any cross section. ENERGY LINE - A line joining the elevations of the energy heads of a stream. The energy line is above the hydraulic grade line a distance equivalent to the velocity heads at all sections along the stream. A line representing the energy in flowing water. It is plotted a distance equal to depth plus velocity head above a profile of the flow line of a conduit. The slope of this line represents the rate of loss of head 6 and it must always slope downward in the direction of the flow. ENTRANCE LOSS - The head lost in eddies and friction at the inlet to a conduit or structure. FLOOD PEAK - The maximum discharge of a particular flood at a given point along a stream. FLOOD PLAIN - Any plain which borders a stream and is covered by its water in time of flood; stream bed areas subject to recurrent overflow, or inundation. FLOOD ROUTING - Determining the changes in the rise and fall of floodwater as it proceeds downstream along a drainageway and includes effects of structures. FLOODWAY (100-year frequency) - The channel of a river, stream or other watercourse and the adjacent land area that must be reserved to discharge the 100-year flood without cumulatively increasing the water surface elevation more than one foot or cause a significant increase in velocity at any point. FREQUENCY OF STORM - The anticipated period in years that will elapse, based on average probability of storms in the design region, before a storm of a given intensity and/or total volume will recur; thus a 10-year storm can be expected to occur on the average once every 10 years. FRICTION LOSS - The head or energy loss caused by the contact between a moving stream of water and its 7 containing conduit. For convenience friction losses are best distinguished from losses due to bends, expansions, obstructions, impacts, etc., but there is no recognized line of demarcation between them, and all such losses are often included in the term "friction loss." HEAD - The height of water above any point or plane of reference. Used also in various compounds, such as energy head, entrance head, friction head, static head, pressure head, lost head, etc. HEADWATER - (a) The water upstream from a structure; (b) the source of a stream. HYDRAULIC GRADE LINE - In a closed conduit a line joining the elevation to which water could stand in risers. In an open conduit, the hydraulic grade line is the water surface plus the piezometric head. HYDRAULIC GRADIENT - The slope of the hydraulic grade line. It is equivalent to the slope of the water surface in uniform, open-channel flow. HYDROLOGY - The science dealing with the waters of the earth in their various forms; precipitation, evaporation, runoff, and ground water. IMPERVIOUSNESS - That quality or condition of a material that minimizes percolation. INVERT - The floor, bottom, or lowest part in the cross section of conduit. 8 POSTDEVELOPMENT - Runoff conditions that may reasonably be expected or anticipated to exist after completion of the land development activity on a specific site or tract of land. PREDEVELOPMENT - runoff conditions that exist at the time that plans for the development of a tract of land are approved by the plan approval authority. Where staged development or plan approval is segmental (preliminary, grading, roads and utilities, etc.), the first item approved or permitted shall establish the time at which predevelopment conditions are fixed. In the case of land development by governmental agencies, the initiation of land acquisition shall establish the time at which predevelopment condition are fixed. OPEN-CHANNEL FLOW - Flow in any open or closed conduit where the water surface is at atmospheric pressure. RECEIVING NATURAL WATERCOURSE - Natural watercourse with definite banks, and bottoms, with flows either intermittenly or at all times. RUNOFF COEFFICIENT - The rate of runoff to precipitation. RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER - (CN) An index developed by the United States Soil Conservation Service and used to represent the combined hydrologic condition, and antecedent soil moisture. 9 STORM SEWER - A sewer that carries only stormwater, drainage and other surface water, but not domestic sewage or industrial wastes. A storm sewer system consists of underground conduits, inlets, manholes, open channels, swales and special appurtenances. TAIL WATER - The water just downstream from a structure. TIME OF CONCENTRATION - The time it takes for runoff to travel from the hydraulically most distant part of the watershed to the point of reference. 10 502.00 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REQUIREMENT All subdivisions and developments requiring a site development plan occurring within the County shall, as a minimum, either have on-site (or provide off-site stormwater management facilities) adequate to control increased runoff generated by postdevelopment 10-year frequency storms, to the runoff rate generated by predeveloped 2-year frequency storm conditions, and in addition reduce runoff rate generated by a postdevelopment 25-year frequency storms to the runoff rate generated by a predeveloped 10-year frequency storm. The discharge criteria for both designs shall be meet at all times. The point of stormwater discharge from the development shall be to a channel. No application for a preliminary or final plan of subdivision nor shall any site development plan be approved unless it includes an acceptable plan describing the manner in which erosion, sediment, and stormwater resulting from the development will be controlled or managed. This plan shall indicate whether stormwater will be managed on-site or off-site, 11 and, the location and design criteria of facilities and type of management. No building permit shall be issued by the County for any site development until a stormwater management plan, or waiver in accordance with Section 502.03 for site development shall have been approved by the Director as meeting all applicable requirements, except that development and or activity exempted from these regulations by Section 502.02. 502.01 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS: Every land developer/owner shall provide a stormwater management plan as a part of every site plan and subdivision plan submission unless a waiver of the requirements of the policy is approved by the Director, in accordance with applicable provisions of the Subdivision and Zoning Ordinances and the stormwater management requirements. However, when the County determines that additional storage capacity, beyond that required by the applicant for on-site stormwater management, is necessary in order to correct an existing problem, it may acquire from the applicant or owner additional land as may be necessary, and/or participate financially in the construction of the stormwater management facility to the extent that it exceeds the required on-site stormwater management. EXEMPTIONS: Developments exempt from Roanoke County stormwater management plan submission requirements are: 12 1. Any minor land disturbing activity (grading) involving less than 1000 cubic yards of earthwork and less than 10,000 square feet of disturbed area and which is promptly stabilized to prevent erosion and sedimentation. 2. Accepted agricultural management practices permitted by the Erosion and Sedimentation Ordinance and/or accordance with approved Sedimentation and Erosion Control Plan where required. Examples of such practices in an agricultural zoning district are: plowing, nursery operations such as the removal or transplanting of cultivated sod, shrubs and trees and tree cutting at or above existing ground; and logging operations leaving the stump, ground cover and root intact. 3. Individual private septic systems which do not alter the natural terrain. 4. Single family houses on Platted lots of record unless stormwater management requirements are noted on Subdivision Plat. 502.03 WAIVERS: The Director may grant a waiver of the requirements for on-site stormwater management in the following instances. 502.03.1 DEVELOPMENT CATEGORIES: 1. Subdivisions of detached single family residential where the following is met: 13 Minimum Lot Size Maximum Subdivision Size 1 acre and 10 acres 1/2 acre and 5 acres 1/3 acre and 2 acres 2. Subdivisions or site developments of multifamily residential developments which total a maximum of 2 acres and have a density of less than 4 units/acre and parking is not provided in excess of the County requirement. 3. Residential subdivisions when all lot sizes are 2 acres or greater. 4. Minor site development with less than .5 cfs increased flow based on 10 year frequency storm design. Any project which the Director determines is an addition, extension and/or modification to those developments, listed in the above categories, which have been granted a prior waiver under this policy shall be required to provide stormwater management for the entire site (with due consideration being given to any monetary contribution) where the acreage limitations listed for each are exceeded by the subsequent addition, extension and/or modification thereto. Owners who have projects falling within these categories and who desire not to provide stormwater management for the site must request, in writing, that the requirements be waived. 14 For purposes of clarity and administrative efficiency, the following conditions shall apply to these guidelines and the resultant plans developed under them: 1. Building on or resurfacing an existing impervious area shall not require stormwater management nor shall it be included as an additional impervious area. 2. Impervious area calculations for buildings shall include all overhanging projections such as eaves, canopies and porticoes. 502.03.2 WAIVER CRITERIA: The Director shall evaluate all requests for waivers against the following criteria. No waiver shall be granted unless the Director certifies in writing that the proposed development meets at least one of the following criteria. Prior to making any such determination, the Director may require that the landowner/developer's Engineer provide any information necessary to making such a determination. A waiver request of stormwater management will be evaluated based on the following conditions: 1. The hydraulic characteristics of the receiving stream or the environmental characteristics of the stream or the site are such that on-site management or detention of flows are contrary to sound engineering practices or detrimental to the environment; 15 2. The increased amount of quantity or velocity of stormwater generated by the development will have a minor effect on the receiving stream; 502.03.3 WAIVER REQUESTS: Each request for waiver will be considered individually by the Director. All applications for a waiver will receive a written response outlining the reasons for approval, or denial, of the application within 30 days of receipt of all information requested by the Director. In reviewing the waiver application, all storm drainage outfalls, receiving channels and channel capacities, velocities and other related storm drainage discharge considerations the Director shall closely examine to determine the need for additional outfall treatment and/or channel protection needs. Further, the developer's professional engineer shall furnish the Director a "Declaration of Adequacy" prior to granting a stormwater management waiver when adequacy of the receiving channel is in question. 502.04 REQUIREMENT FOR PRO RATA SHARE CONTRIBUTION: - reserved 502.05 PRO RATA SHARE VALUES - reserved 502.05.1 Reserved 502.05.2 Reserved 502.05.3 Reserved 502.06 RIGHT-OF-WAY stormwater management systems for certain types of development designed in or adjacent to the road right-of-way will 16 only be approved if there is a well-defined method of maintenance approved by the Virginia Department of Transportation and the Director. 502.07 EASEMENTS: Since all stormwater management facilities are designed as permanent systems, and will be bound by Easements, or in its own lot of record. Access to the stormwater management facility shall not exceed a grade of 10$ if unpaved or 18$ if paved and the Easement shall be a minimum of 15 feet wide. 502.08 FINAL PLANS - SUBDIVISION/SITE: Final stormwater management plans shall be submitted with final subdivision or site plans. Except when waivers are requested they shall be subject to the applicable review and notification procedures and time schedules. 502.09 BASIC CRITERIA DESIGNING FACILITY: The basic criteria used in designing a facility are as follows: A. The 2 and 10 year frequency storm will be used in determining predeveloped flow. B. The 10 and 25 year frequency storm will be used in determining the postdeveloped runoff. C. Emergency spillways and ponds will be designed to pass the 100-year storm assuming that the principal discharge is inoperative. One (1) foot of freeboard will be provided above the 100 year discharge. The 17 effect of the 100-year storm must be considered in the design of all stormwater management facilities. D. The calculations submitted shall include but not be limited to the following: 1. Soil Conservation Service (SCS) hydrographs showing the specified inflows and discharges. 2. Depth versus volume of storage curve or chart. 3. Emergency spillway design calculations. 4. Embankment design calculations. 5. For proposed trenches or pits percolation tests (certified percolation rates based on soil type) and calculations are required. The Director reserves the right to require any additional calculations or information which may be necessary to evaluate the design of the facility. 502.10 FINAL PLANS - STORMWATER MANAGEMENT: The following information shall be included in the final stormwater management plan: 1. All information provided in the previous plan with any required changes. 2. All calculations, assumptions, and criteria used in the design of the storm sewer system and detention facilities. This includes but is not limited to time of concentration, runoff curve numbers, soil types, etc. 18 3. All plans and profiles of proposed storm sewers and open channels including horizontal and vertical controls, elevations, sizes, slopes and materials. 4. Locations, dimensions and design details required for the construction of all facilities. 5. For all detention basins, a plot or tabulation of storage volumes with corresponding water surface elevations and the basin outflow rates for those water surface elevations. 6. For all detention basins, hydrographs generated by the design storms under existing and developed conditions. 7. A description of the operation and maintenance requirements for all detention basins. 8. Finished contours of the project site. 9. All information relative to the design and operation of emergency spillways. 10. Emergency routing or outfall should be shown for 100 year frequency storm runoff in the event of failure of on-site drainage structures. 11. When major control facilities, such as detention/retention basins, are planned, soil structures and characteristics shall be investigated. Plans and data prepared by a licensed professional engineer and subsurface investigations conducted by a professional engineer with experience and education in soil mechanics shall be submitted. These submissions 19 should consider and offer design solutions for frost heave potential, shrink-swell potential, soil bearing strength, water infiltration, soil settling characteristics, fill and backfilling procedures and soil treatment techniques as required to protect the improvements or structures. 12. Project specifications relative to erosion and sedimentation control. 13. All deed restrictions, easements and rights-of-way. 14. The ownership and maintenance responsibilities for all stormwater management control structures, during and after development. The identity of the responsible individual, corporation, association or other specific entity and the specific maintenance must be outlined on the plan and Plat. 502.11 MODIFICATIONS: Modification to an approved stormwater management plan which involves a change in control methods or techniques, or which involves the relocation or redesign of control measures, or which is necessary because soil or other conditions are not as stated on the approved application, shall be approved by the Director. 502.12 FENCING: The County may require permanent fencing around a stormwater management facility if the facility is over 4 feet deep, takes over two hours to drain, and/or the slope to the facility is in excess of 3:1; or, is in a congested area. Permanent fencing 20 shall be a minimum of six (6) feet high standard gauge chain link fence or approved equal. 21 503.00 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR SITE GRADING PLANS Site plan review of grading plans shall be required for townhouse and multi-family residential, office, institutional, commercial, and industrial development involving new construction or expansion of existing development. The following are minimum requirements for such plans: A. Spot elevations are required to be shown at all building entrances, at driveway entrances, and at all changes in grade of the driveway. Spot elevations should be shown at each building corner. Walkout basements should be indicated on the plans, showing the entrance and the appropriate spot elevations. B. The minimum size allowed for a driveway culvert is 15 inches and the inverts for the pipe must be shown. All culverts must be designed to pass the 10-year storm. Culvert computations must be submitted with the grading plans. C. The sidewalks, steps and landing must be shown on the plan and sufficient elevations to clarify the plan must be specified. D. The grading of the front of the site along with whatever cuts and fills are proposed must be shown, inasmuch as they define the ditch line and the location of the driveway culvert. 22 E. Erosion controls are required for all areas on the lot where the ground will be disturbed. The original erosion controls for the development site are satisfactory for areas that they will cover as long as the erosion controls will not be removed (or the escrow release requested) until all the construction on the site is completed and the ground stabilized. F. Site grading plans shall be to a scale of one (1) inch as equal to 30 feet, or less on site with areas of less than five (5) acre. A scale of one (1) inch as equal to 50 feet is the maximum that will be allowed for lots of areas of five (5) acre or greater. All plans will have two foot contours defining site grading and must show the dimensions of the structures, lot dimensions, distances from structures to property lines, building restriction lines, and all other proposed changes at the time the plan is submitted. G. All existing and proposed storm drainage and utility easements shall be shown. H. The minimum site grade should be 1$. Any vegetated swales on a site must be at a minimum 1$ slope but should preferably be at least 2$. Any scale with steep longitudinal slope must be properly stabilized. I. All retaining walls over four feet (4') in height must be accompanied by structural plans and calculations certified by a Licensed Engineer. The grading plan 23 should also note where handrails will be required on any retaining wall as specified in the Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code. 503.01 BUILDING PERMITS: Site grading plans must be submitted and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. Site grading plans shall be used to check the final grading prior to the issuance of the occupancy permit. The occupancy permit will be refused if the plan and the site grading do not agree unless such deviation has been approved in writing by the Director or his agent as being substantially in accordance with the intent of this plan. 503.02 LEGEND: In order to simplify the review of site grading plans and to insure that all items are easy to interpret, a legend shall be included on the plans. 503.03 POLICY STATEMENT: Designs for site grading, and the location and elevation of buildings, shall provide for protection of the buildings against flooding from storms exceeding the capacity of the normal design storm for which the drainage system is sized. Consideration of this factor will also provide protection against occasional blockage of pipes. Buildings shall not be located in areas of depressed grading where overland flow from the depressed area could only take place when ponded water reached an elevation higher than that of the building. Provision of a yard inlet in any such depression is necessary, but not sufficient by itself 24 since it can be blocked or its capacity exceeded by a storm exceeding the 10-year design storm. Consideration shall similarly be given to buildings located adjacent to street sags where, in the event of a storm greater than the design 10-year storm, water would tend to flood out the street and flow overland. Per all County requirements pertaining to the 100-year flood regulations. Paths of overland flow shall, in conjunction with the pipe system, provide for discharge of similar flows through internal areas of a development without flooding of buildings. Where site grading and building location plans do not appear to meet this requirement, the Director will request that hydraulic calculations be submitted proving the adequacy of the proposed plan to thus dispose of the design flood. 503.04 TOWNHOUSE PROJECTS: In townhouse projects, the following is a guide for design. A. Site grading plans shall carefully take into account the need for access to the rear of townhouse lots. On townhouse lots, within the normal range of rear yard areas, the owners will most probably desire to erect a fence along the property lines to enclose the maximum available area of their yard. If a cut or fill slope begins at the rear yard line, and fences are erected at the line, then pedestrian access is severely restricted. Good planning should provide for a strip of pathway area abutting the rear line of lots. 25 B. The location of yard inlets within the property lines is prohibited. In addition, routing or drainage swales through the yards shall be avoided. C. The use and location of open ditches within townhouse areas shall be carefully considered from the viewpoint of ease of maintenance, prevention of an attractive nuisance for children, erosion, and the limitations they place on pedestrian access. Carrying the flow in pipes rather than open ditches removes any such problems. However, where ditches or swales are used, shallow channels with flat side slopes utilizing partial protective linings should be considered. For major storm drainage channels, where carrying the flow in pipes would be economically impractical, such considerations become even more important. Where major channels intervene between units and important pedestrian destinations (such as a school site), consideration should be given to providing a pedestrian bridge. D. Where major channels are immediately adjacent to housing, fencing to prevent an attractive nuisance to small children is a consideration. All channels should be designed to prevent ponding of water. This should be particularly considered in flat bottom channels with minimum grades by providing a cross slope to a minor low flow channel in the bottom of the main channel. 26 504.00 CONFLICTING PROVISIONS POLICY: Whenever any provisions of these Stormwater Management Criteria impose a greater requirement or a higher standard than is required in any State or Federal regulation or other provision of the Construction Standards Manual, or other County ordinance or regulation, the provisions of the Stormwater Management Criteria shall govern. Whenever any provisions of any state or federal statue or other provision of the Construction Standards Manual or other County ordinance or regulation impose a greater requirement or a higher standard than is required by the Stormwater Management Criteria, the provisions of the state or federal statute or other provisions of the Construction Standards Manual or other County ordinance or regulation shall govern. 27 505.00 WARNING CONCERNING AREAS OUTSIDE FLOOD HAZARD DISTRICT: Disclaimer of Liability of County The degree of flood protection required by this article is considered reasonable for regulatory purposes. Larger floods may occur on rare occasions, or flood heights may be increased by manmade or natural causes, such as bridge openings restricted by debris. This article does not imply that areas outside the 100-year flood plain or land uses permitted within such districts will be free from flooding or flood damages. Additionally, the grant of a permit or approval of a site, subdivision or land development plan in an identified flood hazard area shall not constitute a representation, guarantee or warranty of any kind by any official or employee of the County of the practicability or safety of the proposed use and shall create no liability upon the County, its officials or employees. 28 506.00 MAINTENANCE OF STORM DRAINAGE AND STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS Easements shall be dedicated to public use during the land development process when the topography and the natural drainageways are altered. Drainage easements are required for the maintenance of storm sewer systems, open channels as defined by the Virginia Erosion and Sediment Control Handbook, improved drainageways of increased concentrated runoff and for stormwater management facilities. Access easements are necessary for emergency public access to maintain a drainageway or storm sewer system located on private property. Furthermore, drainage easements are intended to restrict private property owners from disturbing land contained in the easement in such a manner as to alter the drainageway to the detriment of neighbors upstream or downstream. Similarly, easements for underground pipes assure that no other permanent structures will be allowed therein. The purpose of this section is to define the responsibility for the maintenance of storm drainage and stormwater management facilities located in the easements dedicated to public use. Public maintenance responsibility will not be accepted for detention/retention facilities with a permanent pool, or underground storage tanks. 506.01 SINGLE FAMILY, TOWNHOUSE AND CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPMENTS: The maintenance of stormwater management facilities located in a properly dedicated public easement will be the responsibility of the Homeowners' Association or property manager. 29 The storm drainage system, also located in a properly dedicated public easement, shall be maintained by the Homeowners' Association, or property manager. Roanoke County's Department of Development and Inspections may accept maintenance responsibility for stormwater management or storm drainage facilities which are in open common areas with adequate access capabilities and are not located in or under paved areas. Situations such as these will be considered on an individual basis. The following note shall be added to the easement Plat: "The Homeowners' Association or property manager of this development shall assume the maintenance responsibility of the storm drainage system and of the stormwater management facility located therein, and contained within an easement properly dedicated to public use." The note may be modified where maintenance of the storm sewer system is accepted by the County. 506.02 OFFICES, SHOPPING CENTERS, RENTAL MULTIFAMILY DWELLINGS, MOBILE HOME PARKS, COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL DEVELOPMENT: For maintenance of storm drainage systems and stormwater management facilities located in commercial, office, industrial, rental multifamily dwellings, mobile home parks or similar uses, the following note should be added to the Plat: "The owner of fee title to the property on which an easement is shown is responsible for maintenance of the storm drainage or stormwater management facilities located therein." 30 APPENDIX Yes No I PLANS _ 1. North arrow and scale shown on each sheet. (Minimum scale: 1"=50' unless otherwise noted) 2. Centerline, curve data, stations, _ _ _lot lines & numbers shown. _ 3. R/W lines including dimensions (radius or radial lines) shown. - 4. Slope easements for slopes where slopes exceed proposed right-of-way limits shown. 5. Names of adjacent subdivisions and/or property owners denoted. _ 6. Development limits shown. _ 7. Existing state route numbers and street names shown. _ 8. Approved or proposed street names shown. _ 9. Destination of routes and streets shown. _ 10. Radii for easements, turn-arounds, cul-de-sac, flares, etc., shown. _ 11. Guardrail where needed shown. _ 12. Vicinity map shown with location referenced 0.01 mile to nearest intersection. 13. General notes. _ 14. Location of paved ditches by station shown. _ 15. Entrance pipe sizes shown for each lot. _ 16. Proposed drainage layout and description shown. - 17. Erosion control stone and type shown. _ 18. Channel change and outlet ditches and easements shown. _ 19. Zoning shown. 20. Projected traffic count for each street _ between intersections shown. 21. Spot elevations in difficult sages, i.e. intersections, turn arounds, etc. 22. Lighting fixture; mounting height, lamp lumens (mean rating) Yes No II. PROFILE AND GRADE 1. Existing ground line shown. 2. Grade line (mainline and connections) shown. a. $ of grade, CG, VC, and VSD shown. b. finished grade elevations (50' on tangent, 25' on vertical curve). _ c. station on profile agrees with plan stations. d. name of streets shown. e. grade line extended 250' beyond _ development boundary where appropriate. f. minimum grade: 0.58 curb & gutter and 1.08 for shoulder and ditch section. _ g. maximum of 78 for turnarounds. _ 3. Invert elevations on proposed drainage structures shown. _ 4. Profile and grades for outfall ditches shown. 5. Grades for special channels and ditches _ shown. 6. Profile for proposed storm sewers shown _ (hydraulic grade line to be included where applicable). 7. Site distance at intersection and entrance _ satisfactory. Yes No III. GRADING PLAN (Minimum scale: 1"=30' - up to 5 acres and 1"=50' - over 5 acres) _ 1. Existing contours shown. 2. Proposed grading contours shown. ., 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Contour of computed headwater shown. a. 100-year flood elevation for drainage greater than 40 acres. Foundation elevations of buildings shown if questionable. Design layout for drainage system shown. Parking , loading berths, and dumpster enclosures. Landscaping. Screening and buffer. Yes NO IV. TYPICAL SECTIONS - Geometrics shall be governed by traffic counts. 1. Projected traffic count shown for each street _ between intersections shown. 2. Centerline shown. 3. Point of finished grade noted. 4. Surface* Base* Subbase* a. width _ _ a. width a. width _ _ _ _ b. cross b. cross b. cross slope _ _ slope _ _ slope _ _ c. type _ _ c. type _ _ c. type _ d. depth d. depth c. depth _ _ _ _ (*According to secondary roads current criteria) 5. Shoulders Ditches Slopes a. cut a. width _ a. ratio noted b. depth _ _ b. fill _ _ b. rounding _ _ _ c. slope c. slope c. seeding _ ratio ratio 6. Same as above for each different road typical _ section required. 7. Channel changes, outlet and inlet ditches shown. a. bottom width _ b. side slopes _ c. depth - - g• - - g. - - 10. d• length e• if lined, show depth & type of lining f• computation Special design typical sections included. Stations to which typical sections shown under typical section, apply Driveway entrances. Yes No V. DRAINAGE GENERAL - - 1• Existing or proposed drainage easements water course. shown - - 2• Direction of flow by arrows for pipe and ditches shown. - - 3• Drainage areas in outlined contour map)es (Sapp°rted by - - 4• Pipe sizes to be in accordance with scan sizes. dard - - 5• Items not Virginia Department of Transportation standards are to be detailed. -- - 6. TYPe of ri ht_ pipe to be installed (on and off g °f -way noted). - - a• Design cover shown. - - ~• Design computation current Virginia Decomputed according to criteria included, partment of Transportation P „j .. AMENDED AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, JANUARY 23, 1990 DENIAL OF ORDINANCE TO AMEND PROFFERED CONDITIONS ON THE REZONING OF A 3.9 ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATEL? ON THE NORTH SIDE OF ROUTE 419 AT THE INTERSECTION OF CHAPARRAL DRIVE (TAX MAP NOS. 87.06-4-1 AND 87.06-4-2) IN THE CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF B-1, CONDITIONAL, TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF B-1, CONDITIONAL UPON THE APPLICATION OF FRALIN & WALDRON INC. WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on December 19, 1989, and the second reading and public hearing was held January 23, 1990; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on January 3, 1990; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law; and WHEREAS, this property was rezoned from R-3, Multi-family Residential conditions, on August 13, 1985. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: DENIED on motion of Supervisor Robers, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Edd NAYS: None Y. McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers A COPY TESTE: %~~--~~ ~~ 7`~ . ~.. C. ~, ~,~ , Mary H. Allen, Clerk cc• File Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Arnold Covey, Director, Development & Inspections Terry Harrington, Director, Planning John Willey, Director, Real Estate Assessment Paul Mahoney, County Attorney District, to B-1, Office District with proffered /9o-a PETITIONER: FRALIN & V~IIIRON r INC CASE NC~MBER: 4-1/90 Planning Commission Hearing Dates J Board of Supervisors Hearing Dates J 3r 1990 23r 1990 p,. REQUEST Petition of Fralin & Waldron, Inc. 3.9 acresr to construct an office p March 28, 1988, located on Magister Chaparral Drive, Cave Spring B. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION Willis Lanier, Jr. wanted to know ~ to be a totally different project tr project is so far out of line that i~ parker Swanson, Chairman of troff said the the 1985 rezoning and p Waldron was welcomed as good corpo wondered at the change in plans and rezoning and proffer changes. Aft that no legal procedures had been fi failed to accurately verify the c requested that Fra1985& Hel preser presented in July requesting this adherence. Linda LeFeverr President of the G Commission recognize all those in a ^tood u ) to amend proffered conditions on approximately rk in accordance with a concept plan dated .h side of Route 419 at the intersection of .al District. y the issue was being discussed since it seems n the previous proposal. He said that the only deserves to be denied. yen Valley Civic Association Zoning Coranittee, ~s were accepted in good faith ~ ~ller,nhe ate neighbors. As the building g sought that the builder had received proper visiting the County officesr a neighbor found ~1 by Fralin & Waldron and that the Co i~Y hHe nditions prior to approval of the p made to adhere to the origin241 P e idents ed a copy of a petition signed by Valley Civic Association, requested that the IancP_ from Green Valley. (Approximately 80 citizens a P• Fralin & Waldron intentionally broke the David Courey said that in his o inionr to let them get away with it. law, and we are all here to decide if we are going Fralin & Waldron would have us elieve that they didn't mean to add a couple o idn't realize they had the building extra stories to that building and that they facing the wrong way. Fralin & aldron admitted their mistake and wants the Gr He Valley citizens to be a good sport and let them build that building their way. oted that Green Valley is much over than theconfoa minglwith ~ts suarou(ndingsf n d not at al this the building is dcgnineering of the creek, and the mud and erosion are a Also, the building worsens the fl ing about real roblem to these people- Whe Green Valley was built, that pthe lot lca~ that P on was unsuitable for building-- Fralin & Waldron is building because of all the dirt that was d ed there. Ruth Mosely said that she rem ers when the property was a ditch, and they're lan for '85--it asn't even filled in '85. How can they have a talking about a p what was passed in '85r and also plan? She asked that the Comm'ssion stand by suggested that the Commission ban therm from building for 10 years. Gar Crowder said that his com ents were covered by Parker Swanson and will be Y covered by another resident, Jer Breeding. ~ ~o-~.- C. Jerry Breeding addressed Green Valley's concern with property devaluation. He was told by two real estate offices ~1~TO h rty assessments V1 Bo~ agreed thatngt was a would enhance or degrade thei P P lan presented by Fralin & Waldron and matter of personal opinion. In 1985, the p signed by Mr. Fralin, was acceptable to Green Va ~e~ was no car~ununic tionseto large mistakes were made here and wanted to know why Green Valley residents regarding th callsattentionttolsuchrobvious mistakes?~Why why have Green Valley residents had to weren' t Green Valley residents invit ble theeresidentsst hwork wi~theFralinl& communication efforts were exercised to en tition be Waldron, present problems might have been avoided. He asked that the pe denied. Charlotte St. Clair voiced her concern with drainage and standing water. SIGNIFICANT IMPACT FACTORS 1. Topography: The existing topography of the site differs considerably fr~n that shown on the 1985 proffered plan. The eastern portion of the site has been filled to accommodate the altered building location and the parking areas on this half of the site. Although this into anf nhsitetstorm drai age system as of Murray Run, these were incorporat part of the development of the site. (See drainage below ) 2. Surrounding Land: Surrounding land uses have not changed dramatically since 1985. However, new co~nercial developmhetFralinc&uWaldronoofficesnand F~rst 419 since 1985. Projects include t Virginia Bank at the corner of Ch C lori al Avenue, and the Promenade Park develo~nent located at the corner of rison of the concept plan proffered in 1985, and the final 3. Site Layout: A comps site plan approved in 1989 reveals major differences, some of t onh .restricts evident, others of which are not. First, the 1985 plan, by the building to a two story design. The approved 1989 plan authorized a five story building. (Note: The proposed building appears to be a four story design when viewed from Route 419, and s due t ~ he erelationship between the Green Valley neighborhood. This building's design and the modified topography of the site, which was altered to allow an exposed "basement," or ground floor level, when viewed from the Green Valley side.) A second major difference between the two plans involves the placement of the roved 1989 plan shifts the building approximately building on the site. The aPP lan. This change 90 degrees when compared to the location arking and landsc ape arrangements, resulted in a modification of the site's P located closer to the Green Valley and also resulted in the building being neighborhood. lan and the Finally, a third major difference between the acesfone he9site. With the approved 1989 plan is the number of parking sp increase in the building s height, the gross flooximatelyf59h400usgaftg increased from approximately 30,000 sq.ft. to app to the proposed Additional parking spaces were required on site to accommoda square footage. Whereas the 198 98 la lan showsna sign fipant numberhof eparking portion of the property, the P spaces on the eastern half of the site. ~~~-~. As stated in the 1985 staff report, Policy TR-9 in the 1985 Comprehensive Plan, advocates strict screening an me tf backs up tonaess intense ehres~c3ential P sesy lines where frontage develop The 1985 staff analysis concluded that the project conforms to this standard. The increased height of the building now proposed, coupled with the relocation of the building closer to the residential area, prohibits the effective screening of this project. Froximatelyr20 feetWitewould not effe~tgvely residential area to a height of app screen the upper portions of theobu locations) t oughoun theeGree Val ley from adjacent residences, and fr subdivision. 4. Architecture: The architecture of the building was not known in1598ow Although not proffered, the proposed architectural style of the building known, and can be provided for the Cor~anission's and Board's information. 5. Screening and Landscape: The project conforms to the County's screening and buffering ordinance. However, as ran the adjacenthres denges d set sthe he ght effectively screen the project f and location of the building. 6. Traffic Generation and Circulation: Due to the r xiPmat~elsltwicetthatuoalthe Y trip generation from this project will be app ft. building is project envisioned in 1985. Total ADT feoma ye 5Route 4q9 has sufficient estimated to be approximately 970 trips p capacity to accommodate this increased vol an•showctwo acocess points s one changed appreciably, Both the 1985 and 1988 p of which aligns with the signalizes locatedcnear theCwesternledge of the second access point continues to b int of egress in the 1985 plan. property. This was envisioned to be a one-way po int. The approved site plan designates two-way traffic flow from this po 7. Drainage: Modification of the sitedueyor ~rilyet )the increasednamountlof generate additional stormwater runoff Apthough not designated on the proposed impervious surface on the property. proffered plan, a representative of ds toe des gn on-siteestbo lrmwaterfmanagement staff that Fralin & Waldron inten facilities such that post-d~ehao~p change infthe site designnis inxresponse to development rates. This in ro osed concerns from Green Valley residents who are obl~rfod Pr perties P hap abut development will aggravate periodic flooding p Hurray's Run. (Note: Representatives of Fralin & Waldron have met with Gree e~aoaec residents during the monte s ~o~rh~mresulting from bncreased stormwater flow, drainage problems in then g and the inadequate design of the MS the Rssibil ty that AFralin & Waldron tray preparation of this report, there I~ agree to participate in improvements e ° Teen Valley properties along Hurray's improving the drainage situation for th Run. Any such agreement would be an "off-site" improvement, and thus may not be legally proffered or accepted as a part of this rezoning petition.) ~ ~~ D. PROFFERED CONDITIONS 1. To develch 28e 19 8,eby Buford Ty Ltmisdens&aA soc. Cattached heretohas Exh bit dated Mar A. 2. To construct a fence along the boundary of the subject property at points where the subject property abuts with lots containing single family residences. 3. To plant appropriate ground cover vegetation on the slopes of the subject property. 4. That the architecture of the new structure shall be in substantial conformity with the rendering prepared by Horner & Associates Architects. 5. That the dumpster shall be moved to a location on the eastern end of the property near the railroad tracks. 6. To plant a buffer of 16 foot pine trees adjacent to the berm to be developed along the edge of the parking area adjacent to the residential properties. 7. The lighting shall be in substantial conformity with the plan presented to the Board of Supervisors with the provision that the lighting in the parking lot on poles so designated on the site plan shall not exceed 14 .feet. 8. To provide a detention facility designed to meet the requir~nts of a 10 year post-develo~nent discharge reduced to a 2 year pre-development discharge. E. CONNIISSIONER' S MOTION, VO`T'E AND REASON Mr. Witt said that if the proposal came to the Commission today without the construction there, the neighbors' problems could be addressed. And in keeping with the Comprehensive Plan and 419 Frontage Development Plan, he said that he could vote in favor of the rezoning with some changes (location of the building and mitigating the impact of the building on adjacent property owners). However, in approving the taller building now it could send a signal to developers that proffers can be changed after the fact without the public hearing process. He moved to deny the request. The motion failed to carry with the following roll call vote: AYES: Witt ~yS; Winstead, Robinson, Massey ABSEN~r: None ABSTAIN: Gordon F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE Mr. Winstead said that the Commission needs to consider the land use issue. Putting aside the mistakes that were made, the project is reasonably consistent with the 419 Frontage Development Plan. He compared the project with Colonnade and LaPremiere and said it is his judgment that the request will not create a substantially greater impact on the surrounding community. Mr. Massey agreed noting that the mistakes have been admitted to and addressed professionally. Mr. Robinson said the proposal is a good plan. G . ATrACl'S Concept Plan (8~" x 11") Vicinity Map (8~" x 11") Staff Report Other Terranc r n n, Secretary Roano County lanning Connnission H H H . ~- a .: ~~ =~~~?F;=. sa=; s~: ~ ~° a , =e ~ . z~;< ~~ ~; _~ 3z z 1 ~ ~ h, ~zYo+A ~01a uz't~€$ S~e ~ p ygQ4 Q ~ ii '~'~ t;;_ _e~L .. a .: __~,'k .d~F 3- ~ .. .. - .. -'=~~~s3`~ -- s 3. 32 ti4F5 '<+ -- {j _ - _ .. `a~ ---~ ~1 ?° I~ I: ~~. ° ~zIE 1" 17 J ~ 1 `~ ~ .. ~{ 5 ~ ~' ~ i ~ ~ s€v 1~ t` _ , ~~ '. I ~-. ~ ~ << ~7 < a "; y Z ~I • 0 1 I i.,7 ; 0 i ~ , II '~i ~~~ IA Y'~ its L -Ti + Q 1 .I ~•! fI I • +N ~ i~ ~ +' ,t III•\ ii" `•~ 'oi" I / I i 14~ y .1{'l01 _~ n_c1:o~;1rs II / C 3Jq ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ' '~ - -- ; ---- ~~ ~~ ' - I' ~ '"' i f Q ~,~/ ~, ;~sl~ Ig/ I I I / ~ ..t .~ ~ i / / a / : ~ / y.ra F-~~ C ~ tA...npl C \~ a- .3 z s N~I 1=; ~i r Y°. :I _ o ~ ~~~~ ~ i ~ " ;~ ---- .~ _ -_- 7`~ = ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N Q ' ~ E ~ ~ g ` . 7 LL p (~ _ ~ ;~ ~ ' ~ a O = y?~o ~ ~ O o ~ -~ o m Q G 0 (/) ~ ~ f W Z t}F'~~ ii W I ~~ ° r ~ r t ~ -` v •4 u :~ .. ~ ~` - ~ ' j 3 ~ 3 ~ '' ~ 4 y` yl \~~ J ~\ ~ 1 (i? l "may ``` . ~ i+ ~- ~~ I ~I a ~~ri ~ - ij ~ :~ ti ~ _ ... ~-. ey ~? / ~J'. '>, Lys _~• ~ ~ -_= __~`_'~- ~__ .-- . I _}I~ I • ',/~ ,J)y \ `/. ~` it .r ~t ~l ~ i Yi° Jvi O O Y z` , 1 i ~ I 11„ 1 • .~i I ~~«-I I JI II_ ,~ei / ~~ / `p.. p..' ` °r. '~ Y~ 11:5,;' 1 I ~ o> ~.. IF ' ANN a it • _ ~.« ve~v 'si+, ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~' i - ~` Iw~sati jI ~,i ~°~°,, 3 _ _ z i <<. q ;; j l 1~ 1 3 ~ ~s2 ~' r~s~~` "~ b ~ say '.,? !I u I (7 I Ii - i y i qq ' y t II ui arc#;e+~ .. •\ ' .~wy O`:~~ ~~t' ~~ e ? ijC-i ~e ~ ii ~ _ Y Y ~ ~ t. / r 1~ .n j - jQru ~~` rry~ `` ~1 FM ~`*5 a'+ \ •'• 4 `~ • °\i 1 1 ~ I III I _ = _ _ ~. ~ I I ~ . ---- ---- ~Zo XN:MN~ 3i 3 3 £ ^~~~ 'yr h ~ ~ / 1. Y ~ t d I I ~ - _ - - • _ '°'b ~ _. ~~ ~ 'I l__~I O ~I \ I i ~ ~If _ ~ • I I_L 'I QI~ ~ y'J ~~ ~ II - ,t ,,.,, s~ . TO: Planning Commission FROM: Terry Harrington Director of Planning DATE: December 29, 1989 SUBJECT: Case # 4-1/90 Request of Fralin and Waldron Inc.; Amendment of Proffered Conditions; B-1 Conditional I. NATIIRE OF REQUEST This is a request by Fralin and Waldron Inc. to amend one of the three proffered conditions that apply to a 3.9 acre site located on the north side of Route 419 at the intersection of Chaparral Dr. in the Cave Spring Magisterial District. This property was rezoned from R-3 Residential to B-1 Conditional in 1985. As part of this rezoning action the petitioner (Fralin and Waldron) offered, and the Board of Supervisors accepted, three proffers that regulated the nature of the development. As explained below, the purpose of this request is to modify one of these 1985 proffers to permit the development of this 3.9 acre site in accord with an approved site development plan dated March 28, 1988. II. BACKGROUND In 1985 Fralin and Waldron Inc. petitioned to rezone this parcel from R-3 Residential to B-1 Business. The stated purpose of the request was to allow the construction of a professional office park. The applicant offered three proffers that were accepted by the Planning Commission and the Board of Supervisors. These proffers were: 1. To develop the subject property in substantial conformity to the site plan dated 14, June 1985, by Buford T. Lumsden and Associates, attached hereto as Exhibit A. 2. To construct a fence along the boundary of the subject property at points where the subject property abuts with lots containing single family residences. 3. To plant appropriate ground cover vegetation on the slopes of the subject property. The site plan referenced in proffer #1 is attached to this report and is designated as EXHIBIT A. ~~ .~. Subsequent to the approval of this rezoning on August 13, 1985, Fralin and Waldron submitted a preliminary site plan for review and approval on August 28, 1985. Over the next four years a series of revised plans was submitted to the County for review. On August 31, 1989 the County approved the final plan for this project, and authorized the commencement of construction. Construction began shortly thereafter. The site plan that was approved on August 31, 1989 is attached to this report and designated as ERHIBIT B. A comparison of the concept plan proffered in 1985, and the final site plan approved in 1989 reveals sajor differences, some of which are very evident, others of which are not. First, the 1985 plan, by notation, restricts the building to a two story design. The approved 1989 plan authorized a five story building. (Note: the proposed building appears to be a four story design when viewed from Route 419 , and a five story design when viewed from the Green Valley neighborhood. This is due to the relationship between the buildings design and the modified topography of the site, which was altered to allow an exposed "basement", or ground floor level. when viewed from the Green Valley side.) A second major difference between the two plans involves the placement of the building on the site. The approved 1989 plan shifts the building approximately 90 degrees when compared to the location on the 1985 proffered plan. This change resulted in a modification of the sites parking and landscape arrangements, and also resulted in the building being located closer to the Green Valley neighborhood. Finally, a third major difference between the proffered 1985 plan and the approved 1989 plan is the number of parking spaces on the site. With the increase in the building's height, the gross floor area of the building increased from approximately 30,000 square feet to approximately 59,400 square feet. Additional parking spaces were required on site to accommodate the proposed square footage. Whereas the 1985 plan showed no development on the eastern portion of the property, the 1989 plan shows a significant number of parking spaces on the eastern half of the site. On November 2, 1989 representatives of the Green Valley community met with County representatives to discuss drainage issues associated with Murray Run (a stream that runs along the eastern edge of the Green Valley neighborhood). During this meeting residents requested that the County review the proposed development to verify that it conformed to the proffered conditions of the 1985 rezoning. On November 3, 1989 the Planning Staff reviewed the 1985 rezoning action, and determined that the approved 1989 site plan did not comply with the conditions proffered by Fralin and Waldron Inc. in 1985. Fralin and Waldron had failed to submit development plans that complied with the proffered conditions, and County staff had failed to accurately verify these conditions prior to approval `Y ~ .., of the plans. We immediately notified Fralin and Waldron Inc. of this discrepancy, and informed them that work on the project must stop, until such time that the project was brought into conformance with the proffered conditions. Fralin and Waldron immediately stopped wort on the project. After discussing various options with County staff, Fralin and Waldron decided to file this rezoning petition to codify one of the three proffered conditions accepted in 1985. Whereas the 1985 action proffered a plan dated June 14, 1985, (EXHIBIT A) this request is now to modify that proffer by substituting, and proffering the approved site plan dated March 28, 1988 (EXHIBIT B) . If this rez~ing action is approved by the Board of Supervisors, the approved site plan will comply with the modified proffers, and Fralin and Naldron will be authorized to continue the present development pattern on the site. III. EVALOAliON OF IMPACTS Tie 1985 staff report prepared by Rob Stalzer evaluated the impacts and suitability of the initial R-3 to B-1 rezoning. This report $s attached for your review and the information in this report will not be repeated here. Below, I have provided you information and analysis on those aspects of the proposed land use and site deselopment that have been (will be) modified if the site continues is be developed in accord with the approved site plan. 1. TOPOGRANEY: The existing topography of the site differs considerably from that shown on the 1985 proffered plan. The eastern potion of the site has been filled to accommodate the altered bui.~ding location and the parking areas on this half of the site. Altt~tgh this portion of the site does contain branches of Murray Run, these were incorporated into an on-site storm drainage system as art of the development of the site. (See DRAINAGE below.). 2. SIIRROEDING LAND: Surrounding land uses have not changed 3ramatical3d since 1985. However, new commercial development has occurred alaetg and near Route 419 since 1985. Projects include the Fralin and ~ldron offices and First Virginia Bank at the corner of Chaparr~ Dr. , and the Promenade Park development located at the corner of G'~onial Avenue. 3. SITE 3~OIIT: Modifications of the site layout have been discussed ~cve. As stated in the 1985 staff report, Policy TR- 9 in the L'~ Comprehensive Plan, advocates strict screening and buffering ~Candards along the rear property lines where frontage development~acks up to less intensive residential uses. The 1985 staff anal~is concluded that the project conforms to this standard. ~ ~t~ -~ The increased height of the building now proposed, coupled with the relocation of the building closer to the residential area, prohibits the effective screening of this project. Even if screening was installed along the residential area to a height of approximately twenty feet, it would not effectively screen the upper portions of the building, which would continue to be visible from adjacent residences, and from locations throughout the Green Valley subdivision. 4. ARCHITECTIIRE: The architecture of the building was not known in 1985. Although not proffered, the proposed architectural style of the building is now known, and can be provided for the Commission's and Board's information. 5. SCREENING AND LANDSCAPE: The project conforms to the County's screening and buffering ordinance. However, as stated above, these requirements will not effectively screen the project from the adjacent residences due to the height and location of the building. 6. TRAFFIC GENERATION AND CIRCIILATION: Due to the increased size of the building, trip generation from this projectt will be approximately twice that of the project envisioned in 1985. Total ADT from the 59,400 building is estimated to be approximately 970 trips per day. Route 419 has sufficient capacity to avcommodate this increased volume. Access to the site has not changed appreciably. Both the 1985 and 1988 plan show two access points, one of which aligns with the signalized intersection of Chaparral Dr. The second access point continues to be located near the western edge of the property. This was envisioned to be a one- way point of egress in the 1985 plan. The approved site plan designates two-way traffic flow from this point. 7. DRAINAGE: Modification of the site layout has resulted in a design that will generate additional stormwater runoff due primarily to the increased amount of impervious surfat~: on the property. Although not designated on the proposed proffered plan, a representative of the petitioner has verbally informed the staff that Fralin and Waldron intends to design on-site stormwater management facilities such that post-development runoff rates will not exceed pre-development rates. This intended change in the site design is in response to concerns from Green valley residents who are concerned that the proposed development will aggravate periodic flooding problems for properties that abut Murray's Run. SNote: Representatives of Fralin and Waldron have met with from increased stormwater flow, and the inadeuttate design of the Murray Run channel At the time of the preparation of this report. there is the possibility that Fralin and Waldron may agree to aloncr Murray's Run. Any such agreement would be an "off-site" ~ ~~~~ improvement, and thus may not be lectally proffered or accepted as a part of this rezoninct petition.) IV. SIIMMARY This request has been submitted by strategy to correct a situation resulting failure to comply with proffers offered and 1985 rezoning action. Because of this err Board are obligated to review and act on which is currently under construction. binding land use and design obligations vo a petitioner. They must be complied wi eliminated by an action of the Boa recommendation by the Commission. the petitioner as a from the petitioner's accepted as part of a or, the Commission and a development proposal Proffers are legally luntarily submitted by th unless modified or rd after review and The staffs review of the proposed plan indicates that the major design issues involve the height and location of the building, and drainage. The land use proposed continues to be compatible with the 1985 Comprehensive Plan, which advocates major office facilities in Transitional areas. This current proposal is not consistent with Comprehensive plan design policies which advocate effective screening and buffering between residential land uses and uses of the type proposed. As stated above, the five story height of the building, coupled with its modified location closer to the residential area, prohibit this project from being effectively screened, even with mature landscaping. ~7a-~ STAFF REPORT Case : 29-7/85 Petitioner:.. Fralin & Waldron Reviewed bys Rob Stalzer: Date:_ July 11, 1985 Petition of Fralin & ~idron, Inc. to rezone 3.9 acres from R-3, Residential, to B-l, Dnsiness, to construct and operate a professional office park, located on Virginia Primary Route 419, approximately 900 feet west of its intersection with Bernard Lane, within the Cave Spring Magisterial District. 1. NATURE OF REQUEST a. Conditional request to construct a two story office building of approximately 18,000 square feet of floor area. Development to be completed in substantial conformance with attached preliminary site plan. b. Attached concept plan describes purpose more fully. 2. APPLICABLE REGULATIOUS a. B-1, Office District permits a variety of professional and financial office uses. b. Commercial development requires extensive site plan review and appraral to insure compliance with County requirements. c. Entrance permit from VDHBT. 3. SITE CHARACTERISTICS a. To o ra h s flat, parcel considerably higher than ad scent reside~ial properties. b. Ground Cover: Cleared. 4. AREA CHARACTERISTICS a. Future Growth Priority: Cave Spring area designated for a stable rate o res dential growth as well as commercial inffll. b. Immediate area is concentration of office and higher density residential uses. Lower density detached single family residential adjoins petitioner's property. 5. LAND USE IMPACT ASSESSMENT a. Rating: Rate each factor according to the impact of the proposed action. Use a scale of 1 through 5: 1 = positive impact, 2 negligible impact, 3 = manageable impact, 4 disruptive impact, 5 = severe impact, and N/A not applicable. Ratin Factor Comments LAND USE COMPATIBILITY 1 A. Comprehensive Plan: 1985 Comprehensive Development Plan designates area as transitional where highway frontage strips and land use buffers between high and low intensity development may occur. Management of commercial sprarl is essential. Large office facilities in park-like surroundings encouraged (Policy TR-3). 2 B. Surrounding Lard: Surrounding highway 419 frontage parcel already 8eveloped as office/commercial. Adjoining residential properties at a much lower elevation. 3 C. Neighboring Area: Mixed useage. ~ ~~ ~~ i ~1 2 D. Site Layout: Conforms .with policy TR-8 (enhancing the quality of highway frontage development) and policy TR-9 (provide strict screening and buffering standards along rear property lines where frontage development backs up to less intensive residential uses). N/A E. Architecture: 2 F. Screening and Landscape: Conforms with requirements of Screening and Buffering Ordinance. 3 G. Amenities: Adequate parking. 2 H. Natural Features TRAFFIC 3 I. Street and Circulation Capacities: VA 419 is an arterial highway intended to provide mobility of traffic with limited land access. Current ADT is 23,885. Project reflects policy TR-3 (reserve frontage strips for major office facilities) and policy TR-7 (limit frequency of driveway openings). VDH&T comments that proposed entrance must align with Chaparral Drive to allow for synchronized left turn. Site distance between entrance and railroad questioned. 525 feet required. VDH&T notes that developer must bear cost of modifying the traffic signal. UTILITIES 2 J. Water: Roanoke County 0&M. Adequate and ample distribution capabilities available. 2 R. Sewer: Roanoke County O&M. Adequate treatment capacity exists and is available. DRAINAGE 2 L. Basin N/A M. Flood Plain PUBLIC SERVICES 2 N. Fire Protection: Within adequate travel time standard. 2 0. Rescue: Within adequate travel time standard. N/A P. Parks and Recreation N/A Q. School 1 R. Tax Base ENVIRONMENT 2 S. Air 2 T. Water 2 U. Soils 2 V. Noise ---- __ 6. STAFF EVALUATION a. Strengths: -Conforms with policies TR-3, TR-7, TR-8, TR-9, T-lA. b. Weaknesses -Design of entrance must conform with VDHBT requirements. ,, ,.. f,J s i `~ i ~ ! ~ ~ ~` I y j ~/~\ EXHIBIT A .. ~:~ °° g~ ~ t ~~ ~~ ~~~ F_ S.~ ~~TE ~ } rt w M a ~~c~~sa'~~ a ;`~ ~ ~ ~ Il~k~~ ~ ~7~: i W; ~~~~~~~ ~ ~ V ~Q Z ~~ Ju IIIii(I Ni~~ r 3 u~i } g 3 1 ¢ 8 .e N ~ z g ~ 4 ~ ~ M,/ ~~ ; ~ •~ ~ .. __ ~~ --~~ - ~ , ~ ~~ i~ ''~~ i IiE ~El A .i ~~ x . fl . ~~ .. ~ ~ . ~ ~ I ~ ;~ I I . I ( ~ ~` a ~ ! ~~ ~ ~ I ~~' i I I I ~I I j ~'' ~"~ ~ ~f~ I \ ~ ~ ~ . _. ,. 1 \ ~ /' '1 ~_ _ 1 `~ - ~ ~- I by~~ i-~ ~ ~ ~ ~ tl '~ I ~~ :~` I ~ ~ , ^~ I ~ , r 1 1 ~ I ~ d ! ~ ~ ~;. ~ . I . -.. I ~ y ,/ 1 ' I ' I ~ 1 ,, I I ~ 1 I ~I I I 11 I ~ t . + I I I i I ~; ~ I I rl ; ~ .;;I I ~ -. °.~-r----- I .~ _ ' -~~1 ~~ - r ~ .~ r , ;~I ~ I i .~>~ I I ~ ~! I I `I ; I '~ I I~ ; ; ~ I , ~;,' ! ~~ - i I ~ i ~,~ ~ , I :`Itf i .~ , I ~ ~~'~-~ _... ...« .:~s. i ~ E ~~ r~~E~~~~a ~~~~ ~! . ~ ~ ~ ~ t ~~ ~ ~' z Ry ! R ~ e ~ii ~~ ~~ R ER ~R ~' + l! ~ i t 1~ ~~Y Y~~~~iIg ~Yp~ ~R! R ~ aa~ S Q EE! i ~! lE~zlzd~ ; E ~! R iE ~ ~~ ~ !l ~ R ~ !1. !ERE ~ ~~ER ~.~ ~ R sf i . ' S ~ i ! 1l~~ Ci .^ r S s~ a~ ~ !E ~~ ~! i = ! ~ _ ~9i ~ zse:s:E~ ~~$~~ ~~! ~~ s R R ~~ a4 ~~ ii ~ s ~ ~ ~ 3 ~~ ~~Elt~~ !°~E~ poi ~E ~ ~a , ~ R sr~ !! :~ ~ ~:~ ~ E ~ ~~ EE~~~~nzz~ EEzz: R9~ t$ D! !:~ ~ ~~ E~ ~$ i SCR ~:~.R ~ - - ~;::~~ ~' r-- .~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ;~ 0~~ • ,r~ ~I~ I ~~ ~~ .[ `,~1 ~ 1 ~ \~ s ~' ~~ ~' ~ ~~r +~~ ~ ~~~- ~ ,~ y,~ ~ l~jr~ 1r tj~ " ~ ~ r f ,/~ ~ f~' ~ 'tS ~~~ , . ~i J~++~7 ~Tr •1~ _1 O w '- ~' ' ~` ~ ~ .Y r b ~ ~z~~l ~ ~~~;~~~ 'tis \ .r'• T ••~ '~;,~ ~ .~~ •\~ I ,~ ~~ 1, ~ ~ ~~ ~ '~~ !~ ~ ~ u i . ~ ~ V 1 ~~~ F ¢ ~[ . ~, Y ~: s t ~~ °~ T S, ~ f ~) ~ ~ ~~ ~~ I~ ; ~ ~ ~. ; , ~• i l ~ II ~ ~ I' _ ~ ,; .~ -- ~~ ~ ;,~, i () I s ~~ I '~ I I ., ~ R !St a ; ~~ . ~~~v y ~7 ~ = _ s ~~~ ~=~3• W ~ 1 ~ .o o y ~• ~ Vl . _t ~ r (: i ~ 1 w I 'L _~ ~~~ ~ ~~~ IY~dVFI~ ~'"__'_- ~ ,~,~ i _. ~ ~ 1 1 + 1 r . ••_ I~:~i E~'~ 1 t1{ A t~ ~~~ f 1. i o I ~ 1 ~ I I • - '~ r ~ ~ .~ I . • ~y ~ I 'y+f . ~ I • ;i' -I I ~ci~ II' ~~ i r ~! ~ y +'L Y s ~~ _~_: -is ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 3~ h i. t 7 \ ~ ~ _ !!yt; s s s s ~ ~1~t?:i ; .~• ~ --, ~~~--~~ ~ .. ~~~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, JANUARY 23, 1990 ORDINANCE TO AMEND PROFFERED CONDITIONS ON THE REZONING OF A 3.9 ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF ROUTE 419 AT THE INTERSECTION OF CHAPARRAL DRIVE (TAX MAP NOS. 87.06-4-1 AND 87.06-4-2) IN THE CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF B-1, CONDITIONAL, TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF B-l, CONDITIONAL UPON THE APPLICATION OF FRALIN & WALDRON INC. WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on December 19, 1989, and the second reading and public hearing was held January 23, 1990; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on January 3, 1990; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law; and WHEREAS, this property was rezoned from R-3, Multi-family Residential District, to B-1, Office District with proffered conditions, on August 13, 1985. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing 3.9 acres, as described herein, and located on the north side of Route 419 at the intersection of Chaparral Drive, (Tax Map Numbers 87.06-4-1 and 87.06-4-2) in the Cave Spring Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of B-1, Office District with proffered conditions, to the zoning classification of B-1, Office District with amended proffered conditions. 1`~~-~,, 2. That this action is taken upon the application of Fralin & Waldron Inc.. 3. That the applicant has voluntarily proffered in writing the following amended conditions which the Board of Supervisors hereby accepts: (1) To develop the subject property in substantial conformity to the site plan dated March 28, 1988, by Buford T. Lumsden & Associates, attached hereto as Exhibit A. (2) To construct a fence along the boundary of the subject property at points where the subject property abuts with lots containing single- family residences. (3) To plant appropriate ground cover vegetation on the slopes of the subject property. (4) That the architecture of the new structure shall be in substantial conformity with the rendering prepared by Horner & Associates, Architects. (5) That the dumpster shall be moved to a location on the eastern end of the property near the railroad tracks. (6) To plant a buffer of 16 foot pine trees adjacent to the berm to be developed along the edge of the parking area adjacent to the residential properties. (7) The lighting shall be in substantial conformity with the plan presented to the Board of Supervisors with the provision that the lighting in the parking lot on poles so designated on the site plan shall not exceed 14 feet. (8) To provide a detention facility designed to meet the requirements of a 10-year post- development discharge reduced to a 2-year pre- development discharge. 4. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: BEGINNING at a point on the north side of Virginia Route 419 at the western property line of N&W Railway; thence with Virginia f7 'Jj`~f`j(~df\ r i . ~ L ±+ ~ ~Kas 1 " V • + ~ ~~~y .see-~,`~„'~ - - ~ _ , ~ ~ ; , •O QYr41 "~ a ~« LJ ...µ,, R?N ', ~ 0.t1•~ ^'irU~ ~ t ~~ ` YD r '`. ~ 4' K~ ~ t I •,~ ` IINdT.~ '"~" ~J~'~, NORTB 4 J 9 ~~ J '''' j ''~ • 63 / ~ •1,~ x 0 // ryj 17 ~.r ; 'Y4 / . ~~1 ~ ~9 `' - ?~ . ~y J ,~ S ATV N ' 4 1~IDY al • ',. ~ f~ / ,• a / 1 µ IS j ~' 146 ac ~o,, s~ ?mss _r H, 1r a .1~' :~' O ,~ , -. ~- / Z ~. _ 6 ~ `~~ a k~ 8 ~~ 2 8} ae O ~ L 0 '~, ~ '~ ~ ~ g t ri ` ~ ~ Y Z !u ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' 1 Vr•~ ~~ 2 24 k ~ _/ r ~ ~ ~ x~ ..~ ~ ~ - p '~ s • ~' y tiro i . • _ _,' ~ ' a 9 ~ 7 J / Rt 87 ti ~ ~ ~ - - ~~ ' FRALIN & WALDRON INC. COMMUNITYSBRVICBS AMEND CONDITIONS ~ AND DBVBLOPMBNT OSTERHDUDT, FERGUSON NATT, AHERON & AGEE ATTD R N EYS-AT-LAW ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-1699 VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY A 3.9 + ACRE PARCEL OF LAND GENERALLY LOCATED AT NORTH INTERSECTION OF RT. 419. and CHAPARRAL DRIVE WITHIN THE CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT, AND RECORDED AS PARCEL #87.06-4-1 AND #87.06-4-2 IN THE ROANOKE COUNTY TAX RECORDS FOURTH AMENDED PROFFER OF CONDITIONS TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY: Being in accord with §15.1-491.1, et sea. of the Code of Virginia, and §21.105E. of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance, the Petitioner, Fralin & Waldron, Inc., hereby voluntarily proffers to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, the following conditions to the rezoning of the above- referenced parcel of land: (1) To develop the subject property in substantial conformity to the site plan dated March 28, 1988, by Buford T. Lumsden & Associates, attached hereto as Exhibit "A"; provided that the building shall be limited to three above ground floors fronting on 419 and a fourth lower level of finished space. (2) To construct a fence along the boundary of the subject property at points where the subject property abuts with lots containing single family residences. (3) To plant appropriate ground cover vegetation on the slopes of the subject property. (4) That the architecture of the new structure shall be in substantial conformity with the rendering prepared by Horner & Associates, Architects, with the exception that four floors will be constructed rather than five as shown on the rendering. ~uiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiio:ie~iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii~iiii~iiiiiiiiiniiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiu - - ^ - ~ ^ ~~ ` ^ - f ^ f/ ^ = APPEARANCE- RE ~~ QUEST -~" AGENDA ITEM NO. ~ ~ _ ~..- __ SUBJECT_~` ~ ~~~~'/ IlL ,~- i' ~% I~ I:-~~r ~ a ,~c~t! - A-~1i Ti~~ ~~ - - I would like t e Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to - recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter - so that I may comment.WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, -- I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE " RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES " LISTED BELOW. - _ - _ • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment - whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, c and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to - = do otherwise. - _ • Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Ques- bons of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. • All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. a _ .~ - -- • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. • Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments - = with the clerk. - _ .: • INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. °" - ~s - ~ i~ i PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO DEPUTY CLERK o - c~ o~ e~ ~~ NAME ~' `~, - U e~- ~ ~ c ~ . ~' - a. _ _. ... - ~ _- ADDRESS ? ~ J ~h ~' i ,~ l U'j? < T ~-~ ~~r1 - - - -_ - .~ PHONE ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~~ c c - ® o - m~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~e~~s~~~s~~~«~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~m 1U 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111,(J _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ~~ - _ _ _ _ APPEARANCE REQUEST _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ AGENDA ITEM NO. suBJECT _ _ _ _ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to = recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so that I may comment.WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE _ _ _ - RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES _= LISTED BELOW. i __ • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will c decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, c and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to ,= do otherwise. • Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Ques- c bons of clarification maybe entertained by the Chau~man. • All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. _ c • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. c • Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. ,~ • INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED c GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION c FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. '- a _ .p i ~~ .~ _ LEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO DEPUTY CLERK ,~ .~ _ NAME .. ~.. i ~ ~~ s s ~ ADDRESS PHONE ~_ _ mlllil Illlilllllllllllllllilllllllllllllllilllllllllllllllllllillilllllilllllllllllllllllilllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllli Illlm ~iii~iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiniiiiii _ Q~ _ Q APPEARANCE RE UEST _- _ AGENDA ITEM NO. ~ `~ ~ - 2_ - - = SUB ECT -- ~~ ~ -~ ; ' I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so that I may comment.WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM , I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW. Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will ecide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. _ • Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Ques- bons of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman . c • All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized c speaker and audience members is not allowed. c _ • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. 'Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. .- • INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED _= GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT c THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO DEPUTY CLERK NAME Z ~ ~_ ADDRESS ~ Z_._ (~ L= PHONE ~ _ l c m~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ _, ~ .m - ~y . APPEARANCE RE VEST _ Q _ AGENDA ITEM NO. ~ ~'~ - SUB ECT ~ ~ ~ ~-~ ~-'=,~J~ ~ ~ i'~~` J - - I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to ~ recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter = so that I may comment.WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM , - I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE " RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES a LISTED BELOW. - • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment - - - - whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, = and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. _ • Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Ques- bons of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. _= • All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized = speaker and audience members is not allowed. _ • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. • Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments - _ = with the clerk. _ INI3I ViDi1ALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION c c FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT .. THEM. _ _ _ = PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO DEPUTY CLERK = NAME a ~~rr ~~ ~~r~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ - - - _ s .~ - ADDRESS ~` ~` s ,~ ~ ~J ~ ` ~~ •~f - ~ a~ c a ~ - - - ~ PHONE 1~ ~i ~ ' ~ ;~ ~ f - - ~ c - - m~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~m t~iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii~ APPEARANCE REQUEST AGENDA ITEM NO. ~' Y 2, SUBJECT ~~ ~ ~i ~~~.% ~~ ~ ~~a. L..i~v ~= L~~ ~ D2,~~rv! I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to = recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter - so that I may comment.WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, - I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE ' c I~.ECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES ' LISTED BELOW. c - i - = - • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment - _ - whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue = and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. - • Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Ques- bons of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. c _ c • All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. __ • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. c c • Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments _= with the clerk. - - • INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT c THEM. - i PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO DEPUTY CLERK _- _ NAME ~ ~.,~ ! C= ~~ ~. ~,i~/:~` l1_ -_ _- - _ ADDRESS ~? 7~ ~ ~ , Iy ~~ - - -_ - ~ - PHONE ~-/,~~ ~/ ~ ~~ = - ~ + - .~ ~- ~ -~ ~ m~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~,~~~m ~iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiniiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiioiiiiiiiiiiiiiii APPEARANCE REQUEST AGENDA ITEM NO. /" ` ~` - - - ; _= I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so that I may comment.WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, a I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE = RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW. - . _ • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment c whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will -_ decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, - and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to - = do othervise. - _ s • Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Ques- tions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. c = _ • All comments must be directed to the Board. - Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ._ • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. - c • Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments - = with the clerk. - __ • INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED = c GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION c FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT c - THEM, c - i PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO DEPUTY CLERK _ _ _ _ s `~ - -- ~ - - ADDRESS - .,,~ _ - ~~ - ~ ~~ ~ .~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~, PHONE ') -~ ~ - < - - r ._ - ~ - ~~ - - 11'i~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~1~1 ~iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii~iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiU _ _ - ~ _ - v APPEARANCE RE UEST - Q _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ AGENDA ITF~M NO. / ~-%` - ~' _ _ - SUB ECT -~ `_ , _ _ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to c _ _ recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so that I may comment.WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, = I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE = RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES _ LISTED BELOW. • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will c decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. • Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Ques- Lions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. c • All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. c • Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments c with the clerk. c • INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. _ -_ _ - i PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO DEPUTY CLERK m~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~:~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~m \~ 1UIIIIIIIIIIil~llillilllllilIII'~'IIIlillllllllllil~"~'IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIilllllllllllllllll~ •f - APPEARANCE REQUEST AGENDA ITEM NC~ / ~J 2 = - = SUBJECT ~~-~ i~ ~~~' ~~A~`/rG~ ~~~. ~a~p/~ f I would like fie Chai n of the ar~of Supervis rs to recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so that I may comment.WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES - LISTED BELOW. • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. • Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Ques- tions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. • All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. • Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments c with the clerk. • INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT c c THEM. ~. ~. PLEASE PRI LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO DEPUTY CLERK _ _ e ~ NAME Q~~ ~ ~ .' D ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ / ~ ADDRESS ~~°~~ ~/7~ ~~~~ __ - c - PHONE 2 ~~~" ~~ ~ - _ _ mllllllllillllllllllllllllllllllllllliill 11 l Illllllllllllllllllllillllilllllllllllliilllllllllllllllillllllllllllllllllllllllllll~ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - APPEARANCE RE UEST - Q _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ AGENDA ITEM NO. ~ C~ --. _ _ _ _ _ _ SUBJECT ' _ _ _ - _ _ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter _ so that I may comment.WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW. • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will -= decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. _ • Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Ques- tions of clarification maybe entertained by the Chairman. • Ali comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. -. c __ • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ,= .= Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. - _- • INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION c FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT c THEM. ,~ PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO DEPUTY CLERK _ _ .:~, ~,~ ~ NAME ~ ._. ., _ __ _~ _ r ~ i~' ..~ ADDRESS ? ~ ~'~ ~~'~ c~~=~ 't.. ~ ~ ; ~.,~ ~ . ~ ; ~ ~I ~ _ ~ s ~~ ~~ ~ PHONE ~ ~ y -- . 7 ~ ~, _`)~ - - - _ _ _ lUIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIJ _ . _ . _ . _ . _ . _ Q APPEARANCE RE UEST AGENDA ITEM NO. I ci ~~ ~- ~- _ _ _ _ = SUBJECT_ ~1, ti ~ r~~,~,~ ~,,, f, . w' a-l c . I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter - so that I may comment.WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE = RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES _ LISTED BELOW. _ _ _ c _ :: • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment c whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will = __ decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to c do otherwise. • Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Ques- tions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. • All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized c speaker and audience members is not allowed. -. c • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. • Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. - • INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION c FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT ,.= THEM. _ .~ PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO DEPUTY CLERK _ _ _ NAME '" ..~ _ ADDRESS ~q~ 1 ~ Id T~~~ (Z~ c PHONE ~U __ millllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllilillllllllllllllllllllllllllilllilllllll Illlllllllllillllllllillllllllllllllllllllllllllm ~iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiniiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii = APPEARA = NCE REQUEST AGENDA ITEM NO. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~- ,-= SUBJECT ~~=-~P ~ ~~ ,-~, 1 I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so that I may comment.WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM , I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW. c _ "- • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment - whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will __ decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue - = - , and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to c do otherwise. _ • Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Ques- Lions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairma n. _ • All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized _= speaker and audience members is not allowed. c • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. c • Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. _ • INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION c FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT c c THEM. s = LEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO DEPUTY CLERK ~~ i = NAME 1i~` ~_.~cs~~ c1 _ _! ADDRESS ' _ - _ _ _ PHONE _ " ~- ~~~"~'f fii~iiiii~iiiiiiiii~iiiiiiiiiiiiii~iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii~iiii~i~ii ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ _ ~~m ~iiiiniiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiniiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii~iiiiiiiiiiii - .~ _ ,r APPEARANCE RE - QUEST _- - AGENDA ITEM NO. ~ ~ ~ ~' ~-- - .~. SUBJECT ~ ~ ~ -~ s ,~ a,~ , ~ ~_ r $ . : ~ k ~ ;~,~~ ~ 6a ~ .> ,~. I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so that I may comment. - WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM = , I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE = RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES ' LISTED BELOW. • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will _- decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, - and will enforce the rule unl i ess nstructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. - - _ _ _ - • Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Ques- Lions of clarification maybe entertained by the Chairman. c • All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized speaker and audience members is n t ll _ o a owed. • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. _- • Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. • INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUT '- HORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT = THEM. - _ - - = PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO DEPUTY CL ERK NAME ~ ~ v l d S , +~ ~ ~/ ~ ~:_ - - - ,_, - _- '- ~ ~' ; ~ ~ = ADDRESS .~ , .~ <<~3 ~~. ,~~ ~:+_., ~~ , ~ , ~ _' __ - „. - - - - - - ;. - "" PHONE ~ ~ ~` ~- ~... ~'' ` - - - - -- -. - - - - - - m~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ _- ~~ __ - ~m ~~ _ ~~.~ APPEARANCE RE UEST _ Q _ , _ . _ . AGENDA ITEM NO. ~~ -~ _ . SUBJECT .. ' I would lixe the ~:nairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter c so that I may comment.WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE ' RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW. • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will _ decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, - and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to c do otherwise. _ - _ • Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Ques- bons of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. c • All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized c speaker and audience members is not allowed. c - - Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. -- • Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments = with the clerk. • INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION c FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT - THEM. c ... - .~ - .~ - PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO DEPUTY CLERK _ - - _ - - ~ ` ~ ~ - - - '- NAME __ ~ , ~~ y _ _ _ _ _ / / _ = ADDRESS- (~' l' ~' l~ ~~i,~. ,~~~~ L~~ ~ ~l~ ~~~~~; - PHONE ~~/~' - .~ ~ ~ - - _ - - ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~,~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~m _ iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiu ~,, ~~ APPEARANCE RE UE _ Q ST . AGENDA ITEM NO. _ _ - SUBJECT _ = = ' = - I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supexxisors to recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter c" - so that I may comment.WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM , - I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW. c • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment - = whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to _ do otherwise. , - Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Ques- __ Lions of clarification may be entertained by the Chauman . ° • All comments must be directed to the Board. - Debate between arecognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. = = • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. • Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments - with the clerk. c - • INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED ° GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION _ FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT c _ THEM. LEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO DEPUTY CLERK _ _ -_ NAME - - - - - _ ADDRESS - _ - PHONE - - - - m~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ - ~iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiniiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii iiiiii _ ~ _ ~ iiiii~ _ Q - APPEARANCE RE UEST AGENDA ITEM NO. 1 `~ ~U ~ ~=~, SUBJECT ~ ~ ; __~ -_~ ~~,.~, r ~ ~~. ,~-1 ~ ~ ~ , ~_ ~ ~~;~~ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter - so that I may comment.WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM , - I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE ' RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES ' _ LISTED BELOW. c - - • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will - - decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule l i = - c un ess nstructed by the majority of the Board to c do otherwise. - - _ _ . • Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Ques- - = bons of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. _ • All comments must be directed to the Board. - Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. c • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. • Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. ..~ • INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED -- GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT c THEM. _ = LEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO DEPUTY CLERK i c o NAME ~~ ~ ~ ` ~' ~\ 1, ~, , ~ - - - ADDRESS ~_~ _ l i ``7 ?,~~ ;~S~i ~ - ~, ~ t - ~ - - PHONE ~~ ,~'~ r~r - - m~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~,~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~e~~~ - AGREED ON A ON JULY 16, 1385, WE, THE RESIDENTS OF GREEN VALLEY, REZONING FOR A PARCEL OF PROPERTY ALONG ROUTE 419 BETWEEN CK;APPERALL DRIVE AND .~ANNEY LANE, BELONGING TO FRALIN AND WALDRON, FROM R-3 TO B-1. THE GREEN VALLEY COMMUNITY AGREED ON THE REZONING ONLY, BECAUSE FRALIN AND WALDRON PROMISED TO ONLY L'UILD A ?_-SI"ORY OFFICE STRUCTUP.E WITH PLENTY OF LANDSCAPING aROUND CUUCUMENTED WITH A SITE PLArJ> . WE 1~HE RES.LDENT_; OF GREEN VALLEY PETITIuN THE RC1ANt~K:E CrUUNTY BOARD OF SUPEFVISORS TO SUPPOFIT US IN THE STr.UGGLE TO PROTECT OUR HMPLY~WITHDTHEIORIGINALNAGREEMENDTROF AN2-STORYT THAT DOES NOT CO BUILDING. ~:' ~~ G' ~,Lc,~ : _~ ~ ~,/~- ~ ~. ,~ / ; ~~ ~ ~ ~ G/'t i ~ d ~~- ~" ~,c..~~.-I, .J ~_l , , ~ (, , ~~~~:~~ j / !7 "tea',-"`_'j~.~.,~t=~~. ~~ ~~-z_-- 1 "1 _ ~.- ~ ~ „J^Yl ,~ti ~J °v ~ ~ , i,~ ~ mot- J rl ,~' ..~ f~ n ~:. ~... / (~ /~ / ~ ~U ~ ~~ ~ -~ ~~ ,,F ~~~ 'j Cpl 7 r.i1 L ~ i' ~~ ~ i y Y. PE-f LION 'i l ~~ N ~IULY tF~, 1`.385, WE, TFTE RESIDENTS OF GREE:N VALLEY, A~-~RFED ON ,4 RE-ZONING F=OR A PARCEL OF PRCiPERTY ALONG ROU T F- 41.9 EF-fWEE.N r:;E-iAF~PERALL DRIVE ANU .JANNEY LANE, BELUNGLNG TO FRALIN AND WALDRON, E=ROM R-3 TO 6-1. THE GREEN VALLEY L.OMMUNITY AGREF_D ON THE RE.:ZONING ONLY, BECAUSE FRALIN AND WAL_DRON PROMISED TO ONLY a~~li_L~ A ''-.~ DORY OF1=Il';E :~ fRUCT~fRE= WITH PLEN-LY OF L_AN1=~S!:P,r-'TNG ;~;~`i.)1_l+~lD (UC~CI~MFNTED W LT H A .SITE E'~ F1M . „JE. i HE (DES tUENTS OF GREEN VALES=Y ~'ET T_1 Ii~N THE L:i;i~,Nt:+r~E. '_.UUPaTY E=~~.)f',FD i~- '~•~_~E-'ER'Ji~~,Ot`S 1 tl `=:~_il'PiJE? T L1:S TN ' `li: ~ ~ RUr:~f:;~ E TO PROTECT OUR HCMES, E'•Y DENY'ING FRALIN AND WAl_DRON ANY E='EF~!`11 T THAT DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THE ORIGINAL AGREEMENT OF A 2-STORY C-~U_tl_ D ING. _, ,_ ~ / ~ ;+. ~lr~! ~~ % ~~t.y~ ~- / ~1 } " jc~ ~ t .mac: ~fio ~- r. .._,,- /. ,_ ~l; '~, v" ' , y~ ,~' LL ~ ,, 1 ;. ~- ~, q. ~~ .~/ ~.4.r- vi-{.. ~ .______ _, r r, !1 d ~ , ,~ r ~t P'" i i ) ~ 4 i i~ y.s~ ` ~ ~ ~'`~ { ..( y _ ~ ~ ., , , „ ~~ _- __ ~j . „i--- ~ '~ ~ jc, / :, ! G ~ ~~ x _ - ~ U ; .. _. ~ 4 , ., ~~ ,, /// R •1 , f ,... ~ J _ ~ , ~ ~ ~c, ,t ~~ 9~ i n _ PETITON AGREED ON A ON JULY 16, 1385, WE, THE RESIDENTS OF GREEN VALLEY, REZONING FOR A PARCEL OF PROPERTY ALONG ROUTE 419 BETWEEN CFiAPPERALL DRIVE AND JANNEY LANE, BELONGING TO FRALIN AND WALDRUN, FF20M R-3 TO 6-1. THE GREEN VALLEY CUf"IMUNITY AGREED ON TFIE REZONING ONLY, BECAUSE FRALIN AND WALDRON PROMISED TO ONLY L'UILD A ?_-STORY OFFICE STRUCTUP,E WITH PLENTY OF LANDSCAPING AROUND (.UUCUi1ENTED WITH A SITE PLAN) . WE. THE RES.IUENT,~ OF GREEN VALLEY PETITI~ iN THE RI~ANLiKE CC~UNfY BOARD UF' SUPEF.'Ji=OR'S TO S~IPPORT l~S IN THE STRUIUGLE TO PROTECT OUR HOMEY~WITHUTHEIORIGINALNAGREEt`IENDTROF AN2-STORYT THAT DOES NOT COr1PL _ l BUILQ ~NG. ~~ l . .~ .~-- .- ~, ~ .t _: ~~~~.--~ .. -, .~ , q/ Y ,! t G' ~~ ~ ~: ~... . -~ _ --~-- ~- ~~ ~, ~.~~ ~~~~~~~ ~ ~~ t~ G ~ ~ t ~ ~ oaf ~- ~~~~t- i~v f.:~G~'~ ~ f' ~Yv~ ~~ 11i 1 t ~~ `i ~GYa 1~a~.2~.~C ~ 37 <g .~/~`o~~ ,, ,~ ~~ ~~ o~ ,~~~ i PETITON ON JULY 16, 1985, WE, AGREED ON A THE RESIDENTS OF GREEN VALLEY, ROUTE 419 BE~fWEEN REZONING FOR A PARCEL OF PROPERTY ALONG BELONGING TO FRALIN AND LANE ` CFiAPPERALL DRIVE AND , r JANNE THE GREEN VALLEY COI'1MUNITY AGREED ON WALDRON, FROM R-3 TO BE B-1. CAUSE FRALIN AND WALDRON PROMISED TO ONLY TFIE REZONING ONLY, OFFIC NDSCAPING E STRUCTURE WITH PLENTY OF L_~, GUILD A 7_-S fC)RY t~ROCIND C.000Ut1ENTED WI TH A SITE PLAN) . GREEN VALLEY PETITIuN THE WE THE RES.IuENT~, OF ~Gl_E UF- SUPERV ->OR5 TO S~ IPPuRT U~~ LN THE STRU~~ ROANUf{:E CiJIJN iY BOARD T N R N I D TO PROTECT OUR HOPLY~ T COM 2-STORY OF A AGREEf'tENT ORIGINAL THE WITH THAT DOES NO BUILDING. ~- ~ ~ ry~ ` / 1^ , // (i ~~r 1~~ ~ ~r~n ~A ~ v~ ~ gyp, p .. •. ,, ~` ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ P i 0 ~` ' v ;;_L ~ •~ ~ v `" ~~ ~ 5 ~~ _~_ ~c~C~ ~, ~~~~-t.- ~_.~._. ^ ~~ ~%`: a~ ~, ~- ~,~ ~a~ ~j n( ~_ Q /~~JL ~~ S '~~1 ~~~- ~ l ~~ •~ _ .~ . ~ ~` ' /~ r ~ '~ \ l , i ~ -, ~, P1_ rlTOfJ UN JULY 16, 1`--385, WE, THE RESIDENTS OF GREEN VALLEY, AGREED ON A REZONING FUR A PARCtL OF PROPERTY ALONG ROUTE 41q BE-fWEEN C;CiAPPERALL DRIVE AND JANNEY LANE, BELONGING TO FRALIN AND W.4LDRON, FROM R-3 TO B-1. THE GREEN VALLEY COMMUNITY AGREED UN TFIE RE='ONING ONLY, EiE CAUSE FRALIN AND WALDRON PROMISED TO ONL`i 1'~l7IL f'~ Fs, ?--S DORY OFF:LCE STRUC 1 URE WITH f='L ENTY OF LANDSCAPING ;1RiJCiNC~ ~•'.D000MFNTED '~.IITH ~, ~~ITE F Lf1N) . WE= THE. i~F:_~i C!E_w~ ~. CiF GREEN VALLEY RET 7 i I~_~N THE JI'EF ~ i_ UK:~: 1 O ~ PPUFt7 !.!:~ IN 1 FIB. !:C~;'1NUtt:E ~~;tJUNTY BOAKL~ OF TCl PROTECT OUR HOMES, BY DENYING FRALIN ANU WAL_DRON ANY PERI`1LT THP.T DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THE ORIGINAL AGREEMENT OF A 2-STORY BUILDING. ~~~~~ 1 / ~ ~~~ -~..<.f' '~...~ ---=~~ e~....,.-% ~. , ~:~.~ ~~ ~.- - - ~_._ CJ .~ JL ~C E ~ ~JNI. ~? f~7 ~ C_' Ct .-~ '? C ~, i x W ~ C { C ~ i~ . C. i! 5 . ~(, I '1 I L1 I v t i ~? ~/ / ~. f'! f J -- ~~- _ _ i / i o ~~-~~<~ . ~~ ,.~~~ i ~ ; . - _~~ ^~ PETITON AGREED ON A ON JULY 16, 1985, WE, THE RESIDENTS OF GREEN VALLEY, REZONING FOR A PARCEL OF PROPERTY ALONG ROUTE 419 BETWEEN CHAPPERALL DRIVE AND JANNE`r LANE, Bt_LONGING TO FRALIN AND WALDRON, FROM R-3 TO B-1. THE GREEN VALLEY COMMUNITY AGREED ON TIE REZONING ONLY, BECAUSE FRALIN AND WALDRON PROMISED TO ONLY GUILD A ?_-S 1 C?RY OFFICE STRUCTUP•.E WITH PLENTY OF LANDSCAPING ;ROUND C,D000MENTF_p WITH A SITE PLAN) _ WE THE RESIDENTS OF GREEN VALLEY PETITION THE ROANOK:E COUPJFY BOARD OF SIJPERV=>UR5 TO S~JPPUFIT U'~ IN THE STRUI~GLE TO PROTECT OUR HOMES, BY DENYING FRALIN AND WAL_DR~:N ANY PERMIT THAT DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THE ORIGINAL AGREETMENT OF A 2-STORY i> BUILDING ~; ~ ~ ~ ~, ~ (~ ~~~:,/ ....~ ~ ~" ~~, ~Q~ yo .-~- ~t, ~j ~ ~~ .' ._..., .=' ..~.. ,, ~ ., ~~ ~~, ~~ ~ ~ ~: ~.~ ';' (~ ~ ~.~. _, ~; 1 P.. ~~ ~~ rte ~ ~... .~ ,~ j /~~ ~~ // ~~ _-~~~~`1 ..~ ~,3 7 ~:.~._ ~.s -7~ a~ 9 F~~ %~ -} ~ 1 ~7r1 _~~~ ~~~~~~N~L 1!~- ~~% `~ . ~~,~~~~ ,~ r~ (~.~ ~~- ~.~ G;;'!, ty ~~ _ ~r ,~~/ ~'- ~ _____-- ~~%'~, PETITON ON JULY 16, 1385, WE, THE RESIDENTS OF GREEN VALLEY, AGREED ON A REZONING FOR A PARCEL OF PROPERTY ALONG ROUTE 419 BETWEEN ChiAPPERALL DRIVE AND JANNEY LANE, BELONGING TO FRALIN AND WALDRON, FROM R-3 TO 6-1. THE GREEN VALLEY CUr'1MUNITY AGREED ON TIE REZONING ONLY, BE CAUSE FRALIN AND WALDRON PROMISED TO ONLY L'UILD A ?_-S-DORY OFFIC E STF2UCTUP,E WITH PLENTY OF LANDSCAPING AROUND cUUCUr1ENTED WI WE TH A SITE PLAN). THE RES.I[JENT;3 OF GREEN VALLEY PETITIuN THE . RI~ANt~k;E CO~_IrJ TY BOARG OF SIJPERVI -,ORS TO SUPPOFlT US IN THE STRUGGLE TO PROTECT OUR HOMES, BY DENYING FRALIN AND WALDRGN ANY PERMIT THAT DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THE ORIGINAL AGREEMENT OF A 2-STORY BUILDING. u ,, r/ ry ~~ O ` ~ ~ ~ a '~ S •~ ,1 ..~ - ~ . ~~~~ ~. !I 't t ..~.f1~../~ ci.~lJ _~.<.~ ~' • ~~c,,G ~~~ ~~ ./`':;Lei-~-- l/~ 1 r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~,~~ Ic ~ c.J~~t~'i ~~ G'~ ~ ury /~ / h / eT ~ /f ~ (/ ~ J O _ ., .i- // T/~.. j/,/ 3 ~d~i~1 C.?/a -, a~~l/ dam- ~~ r I~ , ~~~,1, >b c~ :~'1 ~~ . ' ~ ~l PETITUN ON JULY 16, 1385. WE, THE RESIDENTS OF GREEN VALLEY, AGREED ON A REZONING FOR A PARCEL OF PROPERTY ALONG ROUTE 419 BETWEEN CFiAPPERALL DRIVE AND JANNEY LANE, BELONGING TO FRALIN AND WALDRON, FROM R-3 TO B-1. THE GREEN VALLEY CUf1MUNITY AGREED ON TFIE REZONING ONLY, BECAUSE FRALIN AND WALDRUN PROMISED TO ONLY L'UILD A ?_-S I-ORY OFFICE STRUC TUP,E WITH PLENTY OF L_ANDSCAF'ING AROUND WUCUMENTED wITH A SITE PLArJ). WE THE RESIUENT~; OF GREEN VALLEY PETITIuN THGLE RnANL~K_E COUNTY BOARD OF SUPEF.ViSORS TO SUPPUFtT US IN THE STRUU TO PROTECT OUR HOMES, BY DENYING FRALIN AND WALDRGN ANY PERMIT THAT DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THE ORIGINAL AGREE1ENT OF A Z-STORY BUILDING. _ ! _. _.~ ti . ,, ~: S .G l L ~' } ~- '?,~ ;,,, ~~ J ;~ ~ , ~ ~-~ ,~ ~~r + , ~~ \~ '~'i~rz ~ 357 :~~~pi ~~,-~ l f ~: f ~~ ~, ~~ ~~ ~~.. 1 ~t ti ,T ~~ /~/j/ • ~ ~ ~ I __._. Y _ ~.- , ~ ~-L,. ~. ~M ~ ~ ,7 ~ ~ ! ~ 1 1 ~~ >> ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ` ~, ~ , ~1 !,', s ~ ~~ ~) Pt. T I T~:~^J 1f~85, WE, ON JULY lE THE RESIDENTS OF GREEN VALLEY, AGRF_ED ON A , REZONING FOR A PARCEL OF PROPEhTY ALONG ROl TE 41`~ E3ETWEEN N AND r;FiAf'PFRAI_L f)RIVE AND JANNEY LANE, BELONGING TCl FRALI Y COf1MUNIT`( AGREED GN WALDi-tON, F=120M R-3 TG EE Y B-1. THE (;KEEN VALLE CAUSE FRALIPJ AND WAl_DRON PROMISED TO ONLY , THE REZONING GNL. ? _' I JRY OF-1= iC E STFlUC TARE= WITH Pl_ ENTY ~F E_ANDSCAPING .3Uil_D a. AR~7U+~JD ti~Cl(,IJ! IENi ~D W 1 .1 H A SITE: PL r`lN) `i PET T T I~ iN THE ~ REf N `•JALL E !~1 . THE f~E~ ~ UF_ `J T (Jt IN 1 F-lE- T~R~_<~; i_'L_E U:' `r.OF+Nt1tCL. ~~;tJUPJTY EOA'~L~ . OE ;_L!PEf~~i:_'U~i3 Tt) ~~ f Pl1F ~ Y DENTING FRALIN ,4ND WALDRON ANY PERI`11T l0 PKOTECT GUR HOME, COMPLY NOT B WITH THE ORIGINAL AGREEI`IENT OF A 2 -STORY _ THAT DOES BUILDING ~ r ~` ' j _ I t` ~ T, Y~l-J ~~ f ~ I ~,~ ~ f~i ~~ ~ t p ~ { _ - r ~ ~, ~ , , `s ~.{j r w ~ p/ r, -,. . ~ .. 1 ~' r (..FC-.~ r v ~ ~ f `' ~ `` / "~ '.. ~ "~~ i G z ~ 1 ~t,~~~ ~ t%'->~- `,, ., ~ ~Y. ,~ S~G~ ~-~- ~~` ,~ ~~ . l~ Yt_ ~_... ~ ' ~ t~.=! X~f~'~~.~:~ . r't .j C, 3~ ~ J' ~`~ ~*~-~.•~ ~~ ~~:, C>t~iC t ~e~- ^~ ~~• ~`' , .-~~ ~~ ~~ a /;is I,:, PETLTON -~ v, .t _ ~a ~7 UN JULY 16, 1985, WE, THE RESIDENTS OF GREEN VALLEY, AGREED ON A REf ONING F=OR A PARCEL OF= PROPERTY ALONG ROUTE 41.9 BE-fWEEN CHAPPERAL{_ DFIVE AND JANNEY LANE, BELONGING TO FRALIN AND WALDRON, FROM R-3 TO 6-1. THE GREEN VALLEY COMMUNITY AGREED ON TFIF_ RE7_ONING ONLY, BFCAl1SE FRALIN AND WALDRON PROMISED TO ONL`( _ ~ I ~iRY OF E==ICE: OTRUC TUBE WITH PI_.EN TY OF= C_FSNDSCAF'.ING ~'U_Ll_U A '-`" 1F~'t.ll_I!V[t ~ ~iC~C;I )MEN i F-_D W i TH A ~ ITE: f't r'1N) . IrJL i HE RE I ~,E~~_r ~ ~;~F GREEN VAL. l E`r PETITi~-!N THE ~:;~:~UPd 1 Y BUAiL~ L~( ;~JPEF v i'3Ui~`i 1 ~J ~:IJPPi~R i 1~:-~ LN l iC= `= 1 ~=:11~~L;LE f:li:1P~~)F L TO PF01-EG1 OUf; HOMES, BY DENYING FRALIN AND WALDRI~N ANY PERM 1_T THAT DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THE ORIGINAL AGREEMENT OF A 2-STORY BUILDING. ~j g ~r ~ ~A :~~ ~~ ~~~ % ~`GC ~ ~~/ 3 _J ( j _ ~ /r ,. _ L: ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~..~. ~. ~, ~ ~',~t ~~ ~~~ «~ ~ !JL~TV V'-v - J ~~ 1 PETITON ON JULY 16, 1985, WE, THE RESIDENTS OF GREEN VALLEY, AGREED ON A - REZONING FOR A PARCEL FWEEN OF PROPERTY ALONG ROUTE 419 BE CHAPPERALL DRIVE AND JANNE`r LANE, BELONGING TO FRALIN AND WALDRON, FROM R-3 TO B-1. THE GREEN VALLEY CUI`1MUNITY AGREED ON THE REZONING ONLY, BE CAUSE FRALIN AND WALDRON PROMISED TO ONLY L3UILD A ?_-STORY OFFIC E STF1UCrURE WITH PLENTY OF LANDSCAPING AROUND (DUCUt'tENTF_D WI WE TH A SITE PLAN) . LUENTS OF GP.EEN VALLEY PETITION THE IHE RE:~ R1ANOKE COUN f Y BOARD . OF ~UPER'JSURS TO S~_JPPuRT U:. IN THE S 1 RU~~i~LE TO PROTECT OUR HOt`1ES, BY DENYING FRALIN AND WALDRGN ANY PERI'1IT THAT DOES NOT COh1PLY WITH THE ORIGINAL AGREEMENT OF A 2-STORY UILDING. _ ~~ 1 /J-' `~- f/-- l.' .C_~C~,i,~~~~i ~~' ~ v ~~ ( 1 l~ ~~/ ~ ( / ~...' i C.s...i•' 74' l~ ~t_. -k x..t_~` 1 '~I `~ ~ ' ~~' ~~ ., ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -~ (~ '°, ~. ,._i i ~ / ~~ ~~ ~'~ ,~ ~, , , , 3~Z J ~ ~ • ~ i ~ y, s 1 `-J I i i ,i , J ~ ~,, ` W, ( 7 ~'~ _, ~ ;-. C / ~ ~ I C~ d ~5~~~"~ Y ~ ` ~ /f(q /`i~~ f ~ `~ /.J//~/J/J/. M I ' l~ .... (J~ Pi= TLTi)"J UN JULY 16, 1985, WE, THE RESIDENTS OF GREEN VALLEY, AGREED ON A REZt7NING F=Oft A PARCEL OF PROPERTY ALONG ROUTE 419 E3E-(WEEN +_:fiAF`PERALL DRIVE AND JANNEY LANE, BELf)NGING TO FRALIN AND WALDf~ON, FRf_1M R-3 TO 6-1. THE GREEN VALLEY COMMUNITY AGREED ON TFIE F2EZONING ONl_`l, E,ECAUSE FRALIN AND WALDRON PROMISED TO ONLY i',li LLD A ~'-SIC?RY t7F F- L+F_ STRUCTURf:_ WI TEi Pt_EN TY OF L_ANDSCA~'ING ARC=?t_l~lD (L,UC,U~'If_:NTED W~1-H A `SITE k't_f\N). „~k ikiF KE:~iC~EPJT'~~ CiF GREEN VALLEY PETT_TL_~hJ Tk-; E= kti?ANiir<:.E ~:UIJP~J 1 Y F,t:)ARD Ui= `; I_IPER'v'.L'~•UrRS l0 SI_IPPt=kFtT t)S I_N 1 NL ~ i Rt_I+;ul- E- TO PROTECT" OUR HOMES, FSY DENYING FRALIN AND WALDRON ANY PERi`i1T Tk-iAT DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THE ORIGINAL AGREEMENT OF A 2-STORY BU_LLD ING. j' _ i' _ ~ i L• i J _ ~~ ~ ~ ij J ~ /t i,7 i _- _.. ~C .- -4 .l i f 4~ _ Y J• 1~, C /,, t J j ' - ~' ~~ ~,~ ~ ~ f---~ -- I "~ ~.- tel. ~ f 7 ~; ~ .~ `f(4~:1 is ~ ~" . ' ~,'1 .L.i ,/ . /'~ `l ? ~' %. (.-\ j G ~.~.~ C' V ~ e _ r , -~ ~ L. ,~ i iy -~ ~ ~ - . ,~ ~ , -~ik _ L,. q~ tr/~~ '~ ,..{ df. ~ ~~, ~~, ` ),,~ /' ~ fit., ~. `~'i:.t <.~, 1 ~ ~5f _~:~~f. °a c ~ ~, '/~~~ '.j ~ -~ •_~ ~~~~ ~~~~ aJ %~ q,fj \, ~ ~~~ / ' ~~. PETITON ON JULY 16, 1385, WE, THE RESIDENTS OF GREEN VALLEY, AGREED ON A REZONING FOR A PARCEL OF PROPERTY ALONG ROUTE 419 BETWEEN CF;APPERALL DRIVE AND JANNEY LANE, Bt=.LONGING TO FRALIN AND WALDRON, FROM R-3 TO B-1. THE GREEN VALLEY COMMUNITY AGREED ON TIE REZONING ONLY, BECAUSE FRALIN AND WALDRON PROMISED TO ONLY L'UILD A 2-S I ORY OFFICE STRUC-TUBE WITH PI__ENTY OF L_ANDSCAF~ING ;1FSOUND C,000Ut1ENTF_D W:LTH A SITE PLAN) . WE THE RES.ILUENTS OF GREF_N VALLEY PETITICtN THE Ri~F~NCik:E COUN fY BOARD OF- SUPERVi _',ORS TO S! If=SPURT U~~ IN fHE STRUGGLE TO PROTECT OUR HOMES, F3Y DENYING FRALIN AND WALDRGN ANY PERMIT THAT DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THE ORIGINAL AGREEMENT OF A 2-STORY BUILDING. :-~ -~ ~ .z'f~.._.. ~~ C ~i l r,~ ~• ----`e'i` ~- _'~(t~t~Lc~ ~~zc,/c.~~- •4~.. ~ '' - ~~/~~ /l, r ~ .- _ r _-,.-7c r--v7-t-c_..~ ~ ~ „ -~ ) 4- ~C L1/~ ~T%~"c- ~ 2 ~ - f"yi-, r,_L,.~ ~(i' . ~ C ~ /~ ._ ~~ ,k`=f~Z~-~c:'-~~--' ~ ~ / - "t ~c ~~J~ rat `~ ~ "~ C i ~ G` J,1.. E ~ / / ! ~ G~~ '`~~ ~ `y~Y'~... l~{~ 4l ~L /YIN s'~'~. ~"_ (, •` $ J/~L ji 4~ _ _ _ ~ ' ~ ~_ r _ ~L.~~'~.rl:~/c~ IJ ~ • I ~.'~ c Li ~i.l- >_ f ! ~) ~c-l L'L~iZa 2 A_. cam- ~1 .~Gs-~ ~,,_, R _ T ~: - t -~ --, ~=-~ - ~ 1 s ~ . ~ ~. / R. ^. 't. ~i ~ ,t ~. ..~ _ l ,,,f'%! . ~/'r? , 7_ ,mss J/5£ Ai.- , _ / ` I -~ ~ ~ ~ ' ' ~ ~~ t~ ~~ r ~_ ~~ ~ t __~ r.. . ~' ti •~ 1ti~ ~ ~ J C'~ 'vim ~ _.~~- ~ ~~ ~..... PETITON ON JULY 16, 1385, WE, THE RESIRTYTALONGGROUTEV419EBETWEENED ON A REZONING FOR A PARCEL OF PROPS CFiAPPERALL DRIVE AND JANNEY LANE, BELONGING TO FRALIN AND WALDRON, FROM R-3 TO B-1. THE GREEN VALLEY COMMUNITY AGREED ON THE REZONING ONLY, BECAUSE FRALIN AND WALDRON PROMISED TO ONLY L'UILD A ?_-SI"ORY OFFICE ST RUCTUP,E WITH PLENTY OF" LANDSCAPING AROUND ("UUCU~1ENTED WITH A SITE PLAN) . WE 1"HE F<ES.LVENTS OF GREEN VALLEY PETITiuN THE Rl1AN1K.E GU~INTY BOARD OF SUPER'JiSORS TO S~lPPOF1T l~S LN THE STRUGGLE TO PROTECT OTRCOMPLY~WITHDTHEIORIGINALNAGRDEEMENDTROF AN2-STORYT THAT DOES NO BUILDING. ~ ` .-; f~ , ~.~ / r .~,~,., r , _", -, ~ r ~ __~ ~.~' - i - ..-, i ~ / ` ~ / r _ t ._.._ .,. \\ \ . ~ .~ _. •_ t y + ~ •~ J ~ .! i _ - .1 .,,~ i ~ o ~ ~~~, ~;~ `_Z " ;, _ _ ~i .~ ~~ ~~ .__"") t ~ 35~~ >3~ .3 ~/ ~ .~~ -~ Ji: "'a ~/ r ~i{ ,/ . +/ ':,.' z - ~- ~~7~ - y "7 ~~ o ~,~,~ lt~i~ ~ic. S , W - f'E_ T I TON ON JL1L.Y 16, 1~~~55, WE, THE RESIDENTS OF GREEN VALLEY, AC;RF_ED ON A REZONING F=OR A PARCEL OE= PKOPERTY At_.ONG ROU T F_ 41~) E3ETWEEN CEiAPPERAL_L. DRIVE AND ~~ANNE_Y I_.ANE-, Bt.LC1NGING TO FRALIN AND WALD{10N, FROf•1 R-3 TO E3-1. THE t~REEN VALLEY CUf1MUN.LTY AGREED ON TF-IE RE?ONING ONLY, P,ECAUSE FRALIN P,ND WALDRON PROMISED TO ONL`r t:UII_D A ' - S I ORY OFf= iCF S fRIIC Tt1PE_ WITH t't i_NTY OF LAND~,C:E~.t' INt.~ tif.Ol_INt? ~.UC~t:I l"IEPJ I t=_D I,J I_ TH .4 `~ I f E t ~ _~1N) . wF T t iE ~~-~E_ t i~~ ~~ t _~. c~E- %r:F l=.N vALi_ E_Y F>~ ~F I T I~_,N rho F:t~AN~;?i':E [_-(1Uf~ Tl' ~>OAt;f ~ t)t ~ `.a_~4'G F1`J ~l~f:L~ TC~ `;~_'PPt_iF~ i i ~ ~ I N 1 F-IL ~~TRL'i ;t,L E TO PROTEC 1 OUR HOMES, ~iY DENYING FRALIN AND WALDRON ANY F'ER{`11 T THAT DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THE ORIGINAL AGREEMENT OF A 2-STORY ESUILDING. - ~ ,~~ l/ e2~E~ ~ ~~~ ~ I j ` ~ ~ ~ , ,, ,, ~ __-- ~~~ ~ {' l ;~ :,~ ~ j ~ ~,~ ~ I ~ .~ ~. ~~ 1.11.1 ' ~. \ ~t.~ ` '` ~ ~ ~\ ,/ ? Z~~~~ f` ~, ~. ~~ ~/~ Z ~o~~ , ~__,_ ~~~~~~. .~ ~/>' ~y [.~ / ~ ;~ r j. ff 1 ~ tc. L .~F-~ f.~.~. k ~ PETITON ON JULY 16, 1385, WE, THE RESIDENTS OF GREEN VALLEY, AGREED ON A REZONING FOR A PARCEL OF PROPERTY ALONG ROUTE 419 BETWEEN CFiAPPERALL DRIVE AND JANNEY LANE> BELONGING TO FRALIN AND WALDRON, FROM R-3 TO B-1. THE GREEN VALLEY COMMUNITY AGREED ON TFIE REZONING ONLY, BECAUSE FRALIN AND WALDRON PROMISED TO ONLY L'UILD A 7_-SFORY OFFICE STRUCTURE WITH PLENTY OF L_ANDSCAF'ING AROUNU ~UUCUt'tENTED WITH A SITE PLAN> . WE THE RES.LDENT~; OF GREEN VALLEY PETITIuN THE RC1ANiiKE COUNTY BOARU OF- SUf~ER'Ji=;ORS TO S~_~PPOFIT US IN THE STRUGGLE TO PROTECT OUR HOMES, BY DENYING FRALIN AND WALDRGN ANY PERMIT THAT DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THE ORIGINAL AGREEMENT OF A 2-STORY BUILDING. ., ~ J u __~ f , ~.•~ %Cl~ ~ r..,. ~. r ,~ ,;~ , ~: ~/ 1 j ~-, ~V +~ -.'. f. r' ~//~~i' .~ ~r _._- ~ I f E~ ` tr ~ + 1 ~ ~ ~ (.. \ ~..~ ~` I ~1. ~. .L~~- ... `°,l 1.... t ~r,. ~' f 'V / C~ ~ !i , ~? ;~°' -~.~! ,'~ ;`'1 ` J ~ ~ 1 3 , j' -' ~ ,. , r~ ~`~ L/ / !, i~ ~ 2./,s..::''~L 1 L,C't.~ny ~ L(.1 - _ G:. ~-l L) ~ c~' r L , . r ~! ~~~ 3~~7 ~~ ~~ `~ ~ ~~1~ ~~~ U~~ ~ C. ~ ~ C,~ ~GZ-~h~- ~ ~ ~ ~G ~ ° ~J' y ~~dLL~st.(.t -~S'S'3 C~'~R4~ .2..ArY J= ~ W ~''f u P(`TITON ON JULY 16, 1385, WE, THE RESIDENTS OF GREEN VALLEY, AGREED ON A REZONING FOR A PARCEL OF PROPERTY ALONG ROUTE 419 BETWEEN CFiAF'PERALL DRIVE AND JANNEY LANE, BELONGING TO FRALIN AND WALDRON, FROM R-3 TO 6-1. THE GREEN VALLEY COMMUNITY AGREED ON TIE REZONING ONLY, BECAUSE FRALIN AND WALDRON PROMISED TO ONLY LUILO A ?_-STORY OFFICE STRUC~UP,E WITH PLENTY OF LANDSCAPING AROUND CUUCUt1ENTED WITH A SITE PLAN). WE THE F~ES.LVENT~; OF GREEN VALLEY PETITIiJN THE RC~ANOKE CUi1rJtY BOARD UF~ SUPERVISORS TO S~JPPuFtT US IN THE STRUGGLE TO PROTECT OUR HOMES, BY DENYING FRALIN AND WALDRGN ANY PERMIT THAT DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THE ORIGINAL AGREEMENT OF A 2-STORY BUILDING. s ~ ..~ V 1 PETITON AGREED ON A ON JULY 16, 1985• CEL OFEPROPERTYTALONGGROUTEV419EBETWEEN REZONING FOR A PAR CFiAPPERALL DRIVE AND JANNEY LANE, BELONGING TO FRALIN AN WALDRON, FROf1 R-3 70 B-1- THE GREEN VALLEY COMI"1UNITY AGREED ON TFIE REZONING ONLY, BECAUSE FRALIN ATH PAEDRONOPRO~NDSDCAPOINOGNLY L'UILD A ?_-S1-nRY OFFICE STRUC TUP.E WI AROI-NU CUUCUi1ENTED WITH A SITE PLAN) . WE THE RES.IUENOF25UTOGSJPPOF TLUEYINETHEISNRUGGLE RCIANL~KE CCU-_1NTY BOARD OF SUPEP.Vi_ TO PROTECT OUR HOMES, BY UENYINRIGINALNAGREEPIENTROF AN2-STORYT THAT DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THE O BUILDING. ~\/ ~_ ..~~~~/' (C~f'Ii./[ [,,>~~ vG,f Pte. ,,F~ (~, ---- 3~~~ ~~.~~-~ ~~qs ,~,~ ~; n~~~ ,~o~ ,~ ~~°y~ January _ 1990 Andy Kelderhouse Fralin & Waldron, P. G. Box 2UU69 Ro.~.r,ok~~, Virginia R~; : t~iurr. ay Run Dear Andy: ZnC. ~4U1S-050 In response to tr:e h~lanr.ing lilU3t emphasize your commitment to to Janney Lane (Murray Runt. commission vote 3 - 1, I feel I fi.x the creek that runs paral:iei Having been present at every meeting in which ;ze discussed the drainage problem, Fralin & Gvaldron agreed to flx our creek ii you gc>t t,Ie h~.,ilding. Also, your attorney at the meeting on pat Ct ~.~,..~ pr. ~ ,>c.~r, January 3 said that it could not be ~- i ~`~ offer; ho:~e, that you had G~rorked with tiie 2>e~-pie along the r_.reek to fix it. If you questioli tt~,e reason tae did not discuss the creek at t~t~e Jan~.Iary 3 meeting, we were t~.~ld not to; however, this does not meals we do not have a problem. G°ie havn had ~; ccntl~:uou~_~ _;r~o:~:~em which h~_cs gotten sar_,,rse in recent years. I feel. in good fal.th your premise tc correct our creek F>roi:;.Fm, '.Mat; you plan to ~°ontin~ze with your plans; however, if OI" SGi?e reaSOn thcSr• pan:3 ilaV2 chctnC,eC:, 1 F30lSid ilke to krlilGd In Ld.Y"~.tlI",CJ !~~ January 2Cth .~O c~}">prr~pL"late action can be takP_n. I would hike to express my appreciation to you, Andy Ke' derhou::~e, for your ~~illir.gness to i~ork with the people along t;I2 CI eek. ~ feel y+~!.ir aCtlOI7S de Ser'Te r~'cC)gnltiOn at :k di+~1CLt~t t 1 Il~ ? . .e ~ ~/~ ick Schilling Encicsures: Description of work to be done Art work showing pr.opo=:ed c-orrectian cc: VEilr,er Hodge, County Administrator Jotln Hubble, Director, Public G^lorks Roanoke Cour.;ty Supervisors {5) Linda Lefever, President, Green Valley Civic P,ssoc. 24r. Natt, Attorney, Fralin & TJaldron FRALIN and WAl.DRON, INC. December 27, 1989 Ms, Linda LeFever President Green Valley Civic 3608 Janney Lane Roanoke, VA 24018 ASSOC13t1.On RE: Fralin and Waldron Building "F" Dear Linda: I In response to our telephone conversation the other day, would like to outline to you what Fralin and Waldron will offer to thf thznaboveC~eferen~edadevelopment,Supervisors as a part o Trese offers will be a part of their consideration for amending the proffers that were made in June of 1985 to allow construction of the project as it is now planned. 1. Fralin and Waldron will builproperty wh ch wialtassure facilities on their adjoining _ a net zero run off from the proposed project into Murray Run. 2. Fralin and Waldron will plant an evergreePQbuf~flcngsthe approximately sixtee^. ! 16 ) f oot h_gh t- --- subject property where single family residences have a view of the building. In connection with this landscape proposal we will retain berms behind the curb line where possible to aid in the screening of cars and headlights. As we have discussed, this is substantially more than is required by current buffering requirements. 3, We have shifted some parking in conjunction with relocating the dumpster location to assist in the abThe proposal, particularly in regards to the berming. revised dumpster loT mlall single fam ly residentsend of the site and away f p. 0. 90X 20069 2917 PENN FOREST BOULEVAfiD S. W• ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24018-0503 703-774-4415 FRALINand WALDRON iNCDRPOR~TlD Mme. Linda LeFever December 27, 1989 Page -2- 4. Fraiin and Waldron will agree to make improvements along N?array Run from the referenced project to Crawford R~~ad ac tie 1-ta~~e ~i crusce~, The pffer 1_n ;ip thi c ~,,~r,rk i c subject to Roanoke County accepting these improvements and technically taking it on as a County project. Fralin and Waldren would be oavina the cost fer these improvements, Preliminary discussions with County Of=ficials have indicated that they will accept these improvements as a County project. I Weald 'pike to thank you for your time and consideration during our numerous conversations. It is unfortunate that we did not realize our earlier commit:,ients befcre things got so far along. I am sensitive to the neighborhood concerns and am hopeful that we have properly addressed them. Should you have any questions regarding these offers, please feel free to contact me at 774-441. Sincerely, i Andrew C. Kelderhouse Vice President Construction AcK/kcb AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, JANUARY 23, 1990 DENIAL OF ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION OF APPROXIMATELY 28.05 ACRES LOCATED OFF OF ROUTE 939 (AEROSPACE ROAD) IN THE VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM RURAL PRESERVE TO DEVELOPMENT AND TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A 22.5 ACRE PARCEL FROM M-2 TO THE ZONING CLASS- IFICATION R-1 UPON THE APPLICATION OF AEROSPACE RESEARCH CORPORATION WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on December 19, 1989, and the second reading and public hearing was held on January 23, 1990; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on January 3, 1990; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: DENIED on motion of Supervisor Nickens, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: Supervisor McGraw A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of supervisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Development & Inspections Terry Harrington, Director, Planning John Willey, Director, Real Estate Assessment Paul Mahoney, County Attorney PETITIONER: /~~ "" AEROSPACE RESEARCH CORPORTION CASE N[]MBER: 5-1/90 Planning Commission Hearing Date: January 3, 1990 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: ~7anuary 23, 1990 A. REQUES'T' Petition of Aerospace Research Corporation to amend the Future Land Use Plan map designation of a 28.05 acre parcel from Rural Preserve to Development and to rezone a 22.5 acre parcel from M-2 to R-1 to develop a subdivision, located off of Route 939 (Aerospace Road), Vinton Magisterial District. B. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION D. F. There was no opposition to the request. SIGI~TIFICANT IMPACT FACTORS None PROFFERED CONDITIONS 1. All purchasers of lots in the subdivision will be urged to preserve all trees that can safely be retained and will be referred to the State Forester for advice. 2. The Mount Pleasant Fire Department will be consulted regarding their advice and participation in prevention of and responding to forest fires in the area. 3. All lots in the proposed subdivision shall contain a minimum land area of one acre. COMhIISSIONER'S MOTION, VOTE AND REASON Mr. Robinson moved to approve the Land Use Plan map designation from Rural Preserve to Development. The motion failed to carry with the following roll call vote: AYELS: Robinson NAYS: Winstead, Witt, Massey, Gordon ABSENT: None Mr. Robinson moved to approve the rezoning request with proffered conditions. The motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Witt, Robinson, Gordon NAYS: Winstead, Massey ABSENT: None F. DISSENTING PEIZSP.ECTIVE Mr. Witt disagreed with the Land Use Plan map amendment saying that the guidelines for Develo~nent in the plan call for mid to high densities to be developed assuming urban services are available. G. Mr. Winstead said he could not support the rezoning request because the development proposal is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Mr. Massey concurred. A`ITACHIKENI'S ~~Concept Plan (8~" x 11") Vicinity Map ($~" x 11") ~. Staf f Report Other ~ ,-' f,, Terrance Harringt , Secretary Roanoke County Punning Commission STAFF REPORT CASE NUMBER; 5-1/90 PETITIONER: Aerospace Research Corp. REVIEWED BY; Jon Hartley DATE: December 28, 1989 Petition of Aerospace Research Corporation to amend the Future Land Use Plan Map designation ofi a 28.05 acre parcel from Rural Preserve to Development and to rezone a 22.5 acre parcel from M-2 to R-1 to develop a residential subdivision, located off of Route 939 (Aerospace Road), Vinton Magisterial District. 1• NATURE OF REQUEST a. Petitioner is interested in developing a portion of the Corporations land holdings for residential use. One parcel containing 5+ acres is presently zoned A-1, Agriculture, and is appropriately zoned for this use. The other parcel containing 22.5 acres is part of a 148 acre parcel and is presently zoned M-2 which prohibits residential development. Proposed densities at this time are 1 acre lots on the 5+ acre tract, utilizing existing road frontage, and lots of 1/3 to 1 acre on the 22.5 acre parcel, which would access from a new street. Both parcels are designated in the Rural Preserve land use category which recommend densities of greater than 5 acres. Aerospace Research Corporation is a research and development firm involved in alternative fuels research for gas turbines, a wide variety of environmental testing, and rocket fuel research. Petitioner has indicated that present activities are small in scale and involve only very small quantities of explosive or hazardous materials. The present M-2 zoning adjoining the 22.5 acre parcel would permit a wide variety ofi uses which may or may not be compatible with the proposed residential uses. b. Attached concept plan and zoning vicinity map describe project more fully. 2. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS a. The R-1 district allows only single family residences, public facilities, community and country clubs, and churches. The minimum lot size required is 15,000 square feet (0.34 acres}, unless larger lots are required for sewage disposal by the Health Department. b. The M-2, Manufacturing district, permits a wide variety of light and heavy industrial uses including, automobile assembly, contractor's yard, truck terminals, brick manufacturing, etc. c. Subdivision plans must be submitted for review and approval by the County, including approval of well and septic drain field locations, prior to the sale of any lots. As proposed, the proposed street must men the same standards required in the Urban Service area due to the density. 3• SITE CHARACTERISTICS a. Topography: The majority of the 148 acre parcel owned by Aerospace Research consists of a series of ridges and moderate to steep valleys, with moderately level plateau areas scattered throughout the property. This topography makes this site generally unsuitable for intensive industrial development without extensive earth movement and grading. The terrain ofi the property proposed for rezoning consists of a ridge, with moderate to steep slopes downward to minor drainage ways on either side of the ridge. 1 `~~ -3 b. Ground Cover: Vegetative cover consists of 25-30 year old fiorested stands of Virginia pine, poplar and maple. The state area forester recommends that most of the trees on this site should be retained during and after development, other than those near buildings which may be hazardous, to prevent erosion problems and protect water quality. 4. AREA CHARACTERISTICS a. Future Growth Priority: Situated within the Mount Pleasant Community Planning Area. The growth initiative for this area is to limit growth. b. General area consists of scattered residential development, open space, and woodlands. 5. LAND USE IMPACT ASSESSMENT Rating: Rate each factor according to the impact of the proposed action. Use a scale of 1 through 5. 1 = positive impact, 2 = negligible impact, 3 = manageable impact, 4 = disruptive impact, 5 = severe impact, and N/A = not applicable. RATING FACTOR COMMENTS LAND USE COMPATIBILITY 3 a. Comprehensive Plan: 1985 Comprehensive Development Plan has placed this area within a Rural Preserve land use category. The proposed use for residential purposes is consistent, but the density of development proposed is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan policies and map. The density recommended in the plan is less than one unit per five acres while the proposed development contains 0.9 units per acre. The petitioner has therefore requested that the plan designation be amended from Rural Preserve to Development. It is the staff's opinion that the level of service in this area are not expected to change in the foreseeable future. In addition, the density proposed is consistent with the zoning requirements for ali residential areas of the County which rely on private well and septic systems, both in and outside the urban service area. It should also be noted that the present M-2 zoning is :nconsistent wi}h the Plan map and policies. Staff therefore recommends that the land use plan designation remain Rural Preserve. 2 b. Surrounding Land: Immediately adjacent to the site is woodlands and open space, and the facilities of Aerospace Research Corp, and a residential subdivision on a ridge above and overlooking the subject property. 2 c. Neighboring Area: Within the neighboring area are a few scattered residences, and a contractor's storage facility. The balance of the area is wooded open space. 2 d. Site Layout: The road shown on concept plan submitted follows a ridge. The lots on either side would have moderate to steep slopes and will require careful site planning for each residence to accommodate ail necessary improvements. ~ ~a-3 2 e. Architecture: No architectural style has been indicated. N/A f. Screening and Landscaping: Screening and bufifering requirements are imposed on the more intensive use at the time of development or expansion. Therefore screening and buffering would occur on the adjoining M-2 property only if the adjoining industrial facility is enlarged. N/A g. Amenities: 2 h. Natural Amenities: (See Ground Cover above.) TRAFFIC 2 i. Street Capacities: The 25 residences currently proposed for the two parcels would generate approximately 250 ADT. In 1986 Aerospace Road tRoute 939) had an ADT of 69, while Route 116 had an ADT of 3,370. Four accidents were reported in the vicinity of the intersection of Routes 116 and 939 during 1987. 2 j. Circulation: Access to the 25 lots proposed would be provided by a new street. Subdivision requirements require that the road be built to county and state standards and dedicated to the state. Sight distance, grades and other design aspects of this road will be reviewed during the subdivision review process against those standards. However, sight distance appears to be adequate. llTILITIES 2 k. Water: Public water is unavailable. Private well locations must be approved by the Health Department. 2 1. Sewer: Public sewer is unavailable. Private septic systems and drain fields must be approved by the Health Department. DRAINAGE 2 m. Basin: Located on a minor tributary ofi Back Creek. 2 n. Floodplain: Property proposed for rezoning and development is adjacent to, but outside, the federally designated filoodplain along Back Creek. °U3LIC SERVICES 3 0. Fire Protection: Within established service limits. This area is served by the Mt. Pleasant Fire and Rescue Station. The State Area Forester has recommended that a woodland homes fiire protection plan should be considered due to the types of vegetation on site and the steep slopes. ? p. Rescue: Within established service limits. This area i~~ served by the Mt. Pleasant Fire and Rescue Station. 2 q. Parks and Recreation: No park or recreation facilities are proposed in association with this petition. 2 r. Schools: The 25 lots proposed in this rezoning petition would generate approximately 16 school aged children. Adequate capacity is available in the Mt. Pleasant/William Byrd Jr & Sr High system to accommodate these students. /~~-.~ TAX BASE 3 s. - Land and Improvement Value: ~ 22,100 (Present) - Taxable Gross Sales/Year: Not Applicable - Total Employees: Not Applicable - Total Revenue to the County/Year: Not Available ENVIRONMENT 2 t. Air: 2 u. Water: 2 v. Soils: 2 w. Noise: 2 x. Signage: b. PLAN CONSISTENCY This area is designated as Rural Preserve. The petitioner's request is consistent with the uses encouraged in the Comprehensive Plan, but the density proposed is inconsistent with the plan policies. 7. STAFF EVALUATION a. Strengths: (1) The topography makes this site generally unsuitable for intensive industrial development without extensive earth ~^ovement and grading. (2) The proposed use is generally consistent with the Comprehensive Plan while the present zoning and use is inconsistent with the plan. b. Weaknesses: (1) The present M-2 zoning adjoining the 22.5 acre parcel would permit a wide variety of uses which may or may not be compatible with the proposed residential uses. (2) The density of development proposed is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan policies and map. (3) The lots proposed would have moderate to steep slopes and will require careful site planning for each residence to accommodate all necessary improvements. c. Proffers Suggested: (1) The trees on this site should be retained during and after development, other than those near buildings which may be hazardous and those required for road construction, to prevent erosion problems and protect water qua':ity. (2) A wood?:end homes fire protection plan should be prepared in cooperation with the Mount Pleasant Fire and Rescue Station due to the types of vegetation on site and the steep slopes. AEROSPACE RESEARCH CORPORATION ~v ~, 5454 AEROSPACE RD. - ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24014 TELEPHONE 342-2859 _ AREA CODE 703 January 5 , 3 ~=,..._..; ~. " 1, SAN ~ 13G~ ~~~'d~l~r LVt~~~t~ Mr. Terry Harrington ~. r r~~ ~ ~~" . Director of Planning, Roanoke County P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, Virginia Subject: Foothill Forest Subdivision I, Joseph T. Hamrick, President of Aerospace Research Corporation make the following proffers with regard to rezoning of 22.5 acres of Aerospace Research Corporation land, parcel 90.00-3-12 from B-2 to R-1 for purpose of developing a subdivision. 1. All purchasers of lots on the subdivision will be urged to preserve all trees that can safely be retained and they will be referred to the State Forester for advice. 2. The Mount Pleasant Fire Department will be consulted regarding their advice and participation in prevention of and responding to forest fires in the area. 3. All lots in the proposed subdivision shall contain a minimum land area of one acre. n ~.f-' Joseph T. Hamrick President January 5 , 1990 iREROSPACE RESEARCH CORPORATION ~/ s rr fit! ~4 . u .~ _ ~ • , oar ~ ti .~ t1 ~~ 19~ -~ ROANOKE. VIRGINIA M ~ .._~ ~ ~w.,. ~~ . ~ ~. /' %-_•- _ ~ vii •G ~~ ~'~' . " f3 N t~ ~o• ~ ~•/i / y Off/! _-~`~`; ~-• 77~r / ..-~ ~ gyp • YY""~~ 1 ~~~J~~~~ ,~, ~ \\./~ ,,fit ,•;r 1 °~ T, `~ ~ ~~ -~ / 1 . , w •; , ~ . ~ 1 ~ 1 .1 ,.~ \i ~ ~ '~+ \ . , .-a s+ ~ ~ l i_ ~, . ~~~ I I ~ x ~~ ~ 1 t`'1 '~ ~i .-~/ ~d ~ ~ CMG N 8J ~ L H v ~~ ~~ %•. I ~ ~ ~~ r•, . ~ „ . 1 f rJ~~f • ~, ~,. ~~~1 ~~/,~~, .~ ~/ // ., i o .. ,= . ~'~~ij - lief/ ~~~, ~~!//• . ~ - / // ~~ \ U \~' ~ w .~~ `/~' / / \ ~ ~ i x ~~~ ~ ~ .• .z 0 0 p Z U .i U Cl? lc~ vv~~ O L~ O r ~,- ~ ~~ _o ~K,v~ ~aQ ~ J C ~ q U , . ~ ~ N ~ ~- li, Z Z ~ U ~ ~ O ~ N ~.~- o.. o I CY ~ ~ ~ ' i; r / ~ ~ `7'7s ..~ bct ~ ~ .~ zr nr. ~ r-~ ~ o ~ ~~ -~ NORTB ~ _ ' 2wAc1C1 ~ ~12'S4tlGl, /!04 ~\~ . ~~: ,0~`3 4 ~ b eek Icz ~ / ems' ~ ~ s ~ ss.k ~~/ 31 ~ ~ ~ J/ ~~Is ~-~ n /~..,/ ~ 1 3o7ekWi t ~ 1 1 ~ •- j i i ~ '~'~ 148 ~~n~ .~ ~ <~ r~ ~~~ ~ ( ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~e5k+a~ v ~ ~ ~ ~\~ e ~~ ~ sskl. ~ ~ O wum~ -~ aoo ~ t 3 ,~.kK ,~ ~ '~ ,~ eck 5 ~ ~~ '~ ~ 1.~af 1 ~ ~ ~5, ~ / / ~ ~ 22 ~y~ .ZpO, t ~' 15 3 f~. ~ 32 k \ ' ~ 3~ is .JI G7CV~!IU ~ / , ~ 152 _ ~`•, '~os1 ~ ~ ~ ;51 / v~o ` Bole ~ ~fce ... ~4 : oo~c 21 / a ~ ~ ~~e 33 ~ ~ ~ 1 • 36 ~z~ Sylic~01 ~ 35 20 aj~M ', i~ w~ •M4cC). .i9~c 1 ~ ~ Ici-cm~ y~ ~~~ usauK} p6S~ctQ n TO~cK1 ~ ~~ Ri see - . _ ., ~~ • AEROSPACE RESEARCH CORPORATION COMMUNITY SBRVICB.S AND DBVRLOPMBNT M-2 TO R-1 ~ ~U -3 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, JANUARY 23, 1990 ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION OF APPROXIMATELY 28.05 ACRES LOCATED OFF OF ROUTE 939 (AEROSPACE ROAD) IN THE VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM RURAL PRESERVE TO DEVELOPMENT AND TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A 22.5 ACRE PARCEL FROM M-2 TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION R-1 UPON THE APPLICATION OF AEROSPACE RESEARCH CORPORA- TION WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on December 19, 1989, and the second reading and public hearing was held on January 23, 1990; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on January 3, 1990; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the Future Land Use Plan map designation of a certain tract of real estate containing approximately 28.05 acres, as described herein, owned by Aerospace Research Corporation and located off of Route 939 (Aerospace Road) in the Vinton Magisterial District be changed from Rural Preserve to Development; and 2. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing approximately 22.5 acres, as described herein, owned by Aerospace Research Corporation and located off of Route 939 (Aerospace Road) in the Vinton Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of M-2, General Industrial District, to the zoning classification of R-1, Single Family Residential District. 3. That the applicant has voluntarily proffered in writing the i9s- following conditions which the Board of Supervisors hereby accepts: (1) All purchasers of lots in the subdivision will be urged to preserve all trees that can safely be retained and will be referred to the State Forester for advice. (2) The Mount Pleasant Fire Department will be consulted regarding their advice and partici- pation in prevention of and responding to forest fires in the area. (3) All lots in the proposed subdivision shall contain a minimum land area of one acre. 4. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: Parcel No. 1 (Tax Map No 90 00-3-12) BEGINNING at an iron pin at the north edge of Aerospace Road (State Route 939) right-of-way; thence N. 19 deg. 10' E. 1250 feet to a second point at the northeast corner; thence N. 75 deg. W. 1057 feet to a third point at the northwest corner; thence S. 4 deg. 15' E. 1370 feet to a point at the north edge of Aerospace Road; thence S. 82 deg. E. 485 feet to the point of beginning; containing 22.5 acres, more or less. BEING a portion of a tract of land recorded in the office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court for Roanoke County, Virginia, in Deed Book 681, page 54. Parcel No. 2 (Tax Map No 90 00-3-23) BEGINNING at an iron pipe on the north side of State Route 939 approximately 500 feet est of the centerline of State Route 116; thence S. 51 deg. E. 302.5 feet to a corner point; thence N. 53 deg. 10' E. 167.5 feet to a point on the edge of the Route 939 right-of-way; thence N. 39 deg. 25' E. 158.7 feet to a point on the edge of Route 939 right-of-way; thence N. 27 deg. 50' E. 178 feet on the edge of Route 939 right-of-way; thence N. 56 deg. 30' W. 670 feet to a point in Back Creek; thence N. 0 deg. 36' E. 1120 feet to the beginning; said parcel containing 5.55 acres, more or less. BEING property recorded in Deed Book 999, page 196 and a portion of a property recorded in Deed Book 681, page 54 in the office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court for Roanoke County, Virginia. 5. That the effective date of this ordinance shall be January 23, 1990. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, JANUARY 23, 1990 DENIAL OF ORDINANCE TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A 1.016 ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED GENERALLY BEHIND 3707 AND 3655 BRAMBLETON AVENUE (TAX MAP NOS. 77.09-4-52 AND 77.09-4-52.1) IN THE WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF B- 2 TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF M-1 WITH CONDITIONS UPON THE APPLICATION OF BRAMBLETON STORAGE CORPORATION WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on December 19, 1989, and the second reading and public hearing was held January 23, 1990; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on January 3, 1990; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: Denied on motion of Supervisor Nickens, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Development & Inspections Terry Harrington, Director, Planning John Willey, Director, Real Estate Assessment Paul Mahoney, County Attorney ~9~-y PETITIONER: SRAMBLETON STORAGE OORPORATION CASE NfAKBER: 6-1/90 Planning Commission Hearing Date: January 3, 1990 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: January 23, 1990 A. REQUEST Petition of Bram'-~leton Storage Corporation amend the proffered conditions on a 1.01 acre tract in accordance with a concept plan dated November 10, 1989 and to conditionally rezone a 1.016 acre tract from B-2 to M-1 to construct mini-warehouses, located generally behind 3707 and 3655 Brambleton Avenue, Windsor Hills Magisterial District. 3. CITIZEN PARTICIPA'T'ION Doug Basham, representing Brambleton Hardware, expressed concern with traffic flow and potential erosion problems. He said that some portions of the easement off Brambleton Avenue are only 17~ feet wide. Evelyn Gunter voiced the following concerns: haphazard development along Brambleton Avenue and its effect on Garst Mill Road; the large number of storage units being proposed; Garst Mill Road is an entrance to neighborhoods (area is largely residential); designation of urban core should be downgraded; stormwater management; flooding from Mud Lick Creek; aesthetics; signage. C. SIGNIFICANT IMPACT FACTORS 1. Comprehensive Plan: 1985 Comprehensive DeveloTxnent Plan has placed this area within a Core land use category. Warehouse land uses are discouraged with low compatibility in areas designated as Core. The proposal is consistent with policy C-5 (provide separation, screening and buffering along core boundaries to reduce nuisances with less intensive development). Proposed use is not consistent with policies C-2 (provide arterial or higher grade street service to each core area), and C-4 (coordinate site design regarding pedestrian and vehicular access, complementary building design, enhanced signage, and conservation of natural amenities). Mixed use urban development encouraged by policy C-1 is not applicable to mini-warehouses according to core land use applications. 2. Site Layout: Concept plan indicates five buildings varying in size frcen 3,300 sq.ft. to 8,800 sq.ft. consisting of individual units varying in size from 150 sq.ft. to 200 sq.ft. Primary access would be from 25 foot private easement west to Garst Mill Road and on a more limited basis from a 20 foot private easement south to Brambleton Avenue. Interior access is adequate for one-way traffic only. Existing common access roadway must remain a paved two-way street. Layout appears to lack adequate areas for renters to load/unload vehicles without blocking primary access. 3. Amenities: Concept plan indicates one parking space. This is not sufficient based on current County requirements. No spaces are available for customer use. 4. Natural Features: Steep slope at rear of property has not been adequately addressed. Development Review division recommends no new cuts into existing slopes. Dimensional layout may not be functional as planned. Slope protection would likely require a serious reduction in number of mini-warehouse units. ~~~-~ 5. Circulation: Mini-warehouses typically generate 55-60 vehicle trip ends per day (approximately 7-8 trip ends per hour). VDOT reports that street access may require upgrading, depending upon total number of units constructed. Directional traffic may be difficult to control for both two-way common access on site's western border and one-way interior vehicular flow. Without customer parking, renters would be forced to park in travel aisle, exacerbating an already hazardous situation due to crowded buildings and visibility obstructions. D. PROFFERED CONDITIONS FOR BOTH PARCELS 1. The property will be developed in substantial compliance with the concept plan by T.P. Parker [dated November 20, 1989 for parcel 77.09-4-52; dated December 8, 1989 for parcel 77.09-4-52.1]. 2. The rezoned property will be used only for the purpose of constructing and operating mini-warehouses thereon. 3. Petitioner agrees to install such fire hydrants as are necessary in accordance with the requirements of the County Fire Marshal. 4. The property will not be utilized for any form of outside storage. 5. Petitioner agrees to slope the bank at the rear of the property in accordance with the requirements of the County engineer; to hydroseed the bank so as to stabilize it with grass, shrubbery or other appropriate cover and to remain responsible for the maintenance of the slope and to promptly correct any erosion that may occur. 6. Petitioner agrees to create an attrative exterior by painting the metal of the proposed building or covering the same with natural wood. E. CONY~IISSIONER' S MOTION, VOTE AND REASON Mr. Gordon moved to approve the petition carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Winstead, Witt, Robinson, Massey, NAYS: None ABSENT: None with proffered conditions. The motion Gordon F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE None G . ATTACHMENTS ~~,r Concept Plan (8~" x 11") f,~ Vicinity Map (8~" x 11") Staf f Report Other ,: ~` Terrance rringt Secretary Roanoke unty anning Commission 190-~ TO: Roanoke County Planning Commission FROM: Tim Beard, Associate Planner DATE: December 29, 1989 SUBJECT: Amendment of Proffered Conditions, Brambleton Storage In July 1984, Earl Frith (former owner of parcel X77.09-4-52.1) petitioned the County Board of Supervisors for a change in zoning of the referenced 1.01 acre tract situated immediately north of present-day Winston's Restaurant and soon-to-be Carilion Medical Facility on the north side of Brambleton Avenue. The request was granted with the following proffered conditions: 1) To slope the bank. 2) To hydroseed the bank so as to stabilize it with grass and shrubbery cover. 3) To remain responsible for the slope and to correct promptly any erosion that may occur. 4) To limit the permitted uses to mini-warehouses. 5) To create an attractive exterior by painting the metal or covering with natural wood. 6) To abide by the offered site plan. At this time, Brambleton Storage Corporation is requesting an amendment of conditions, specifically, the substitution of a new concept plan for the previously proffered site plan referenced by number 6 above. Significant concerns remain regarding the viability of both one-way and two-way traffic as projected on the concept plan, especially relating to emergency vehicle access. Also County Development Review and Engineering staff have noted that the rear slope may exceed 2 to 1 (petitioner has provided no topographic detail of slope impact). The ability to comply with proffers 1, 2, and 3 above will depend on the location of any retaining walls which may be required. Roanoke County's erosion and sediment control ordinance permits staff to require certification of soil stabilization by a soils engineer or construction of a retaining wall when the slope ratio exceeds 2 to 1. ajb 1 ~ A STAFF RBPORT CASE NUMBERt 6-1/90 PETITIONERS BRAMBLETON STORAGE CORP. REVIEWED BY: TIM BEARD DA?Bs JANUARY 3, 1990 Petition of Brambleton Storage Corporation amend the proffered conditions on a 1.01 acre tract in accordance with a concept plan dated November 10, 1989 and to conditionally rezone a 1.016 acre tract from B-2 to M-1 to construct mini-warehouses, located generally behind 3707 and 3655 Brambleton Avenue, Windsor Hills Magisterial District. 1. NATURE OF REQUEST a. Conditional request to construct five one-story mini-warehouse buildings totaling approximately 26,700 sq.ft. consisting of 130-140 units. Proposal includes amending conditions on existing M-1 tract and rezoning adjacent similarly sized parcel to accommodate entire facility. b. Concept plan and zoning vicinity map describe project more fully. 2. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS a. The M-1, Light Industrial District permits a variety of light industrial uses. At time of the 1984 rezoning of parcel 52.1, petitioner proffered to slope and hydroseed the rear bank stabilizing it with grass and shrubbery cover and to remain responsible for the for the slope and promptly correct any erosion. Petitioner also proffered to limit permitted uses to mini-warehouses and to apply attractive paint or natural wood to warehouse exteriors. Owner has proffered that proposed site will be used only for mini-warehouse construction and operation and that such development will be in substantial conformity with concept plan dated 11/20/89. b. Site plan review will be required to ensure compliance with County regulations. c. VDOT commercial entrance permits may be required. 3. SITE CHARACTERISTICS a. Topography: Flat to steeply sloped at rear border; moderate to steeply sloped on east boundary. b. Ground Cover: Gravel, dirt, scattered pines on eastern portion of site. 4. AREA CHARACTERISTICS a. Future Growth Priority: Situated within the Cave Spring Community Planning Area. ?his area has been designated for stable growth. Urban services are, available. b. General area is developed with residential, institutional, commercial, and light industrial uses. 5. LAND USE IMPACT ASSESSMENT Rating: Rate each factor according to the impact of the proposed action. Use a~scale of 1 through 5. 1 = positive impact, 2 = negligible impact, 3 = manageable impact, 4 = disruptive impact, 5 = severe impact, and N/A = not applicable. R1',TING- FACTOR COMMENTS ~ LAND USE COMPATIBILITY ~~~~_ 4 a. Comprehensive Plan: 1985 Comprehensive Development Plan has _ placed this area within a Core land use category. Warehouse land uses are discouraged with low compatibility in areas designated as Core. The proposal is consistent with policy C-5 (provide separation, screening and buffering along core boundaries to reduce nuisances i-ith less intensive development). Proposed use is not consistent with policies C-2 (provide arterial or higher grade street service to each core area), and C-4 (coordinate site design regarding pedestrian and vehicular access, complementary building design, enhanced signage, and conservation of natural amenities). Mixed use urban development encouraged by policy C-1 is not applicable to mini-warehouses according to core land use applications. 3 b. Surrounding Land: Single family attached residential, office, retail and service commercial, light industrial and vacant land uses. 3 c. Neighboring Area: Single family residential, institutional, office, retail and general commercial land uses. 5 d. Site Layout: Concept plan indicates five buildings varying in size from 3,300 sq.ft. to 8,800 sq.ft. consisting of individual units varying in size from 150 sq.ft. to 200 sq.f t. Primary access would be from 25 foot private easement west to Garst Mill Road and on a more limited basis from a 20 foot private easement south to Brambleton Avenue. Interior access is adequate for one-way traffic only. Existing common access roadway must remain a paved two-way street. Layout appears to lack adequate areas for renters to load/unload vehicles without blocking primary access. 3 e. Architecture: Attractive metal paint or natural wood exterior proffered for parcel 52.1. No such proffer affects parcel 52 thus far. 3 f. Screening and Landscape: Per ordinance. 4 g. Amenities: Concept plan indicates one parking space. This is not sufficient based on current County requirements. No spaces are available for customer use. 4 h. Natural Features: Steep slope at rear of property has not been adequately addressed. Development Review division recommends no new cuts into existing slopes. Dimensional layout may not be functional as planned. Slope protection would likely require a serious reduction in number of aini-warehouse units. TRAFFIC 3 i. Street Capacities: 1986 ADT: 21,450 (U.S. 221). 7,603 (VA 682 from 221 to VA 1658). Three accidents reported in 1989 on the } mi. segment of VA 682. Petitioner's site offers no direct access onto a public street. 5 j. Circulation: Mini-warehouses typically generate 55-60 vehicle trip ends per day (approximately 7-8 trip ends per hour). VDOT reports that street access may require upgrading, depending upon total number of units constructed. Directional traffic may be difficult to control for both two-way common access on site's western border and one-way interior vehicular flow. Without customer parking, renters would be forced to park in travel aisle, exacerbating an already hazardous situation due to crowded buildings and visibility obstructions. UTILITIES 2. k., Water: Adequate supply and distribution; owner may c~~ec~ to 6" extension southwest of subject site provided necessary easements are acquired. 2 1. Sewer: Adequate treatment and transmission; available _ immediately north of petitioners site. DRAINAGE 2 m. Basins Mud Lick Creek subbasin. N A n. Floodplain: Proposed site is not located within a FEMA flood hazard zone. PUBLIC SERVICES 3 0. Fire Protection: Within estaalished service standard regarding response time. Potential problems with emergency vehicle access. 3 p. Rescue: Within established service standard regarding response time. Potential problems with emergency vehicle access. N/A q. Parks and Recreation: N/A r. School: TAX BASE s. - Land and Improvement Value: (Unimproved land only) $60,300 - Taxable Gross Sales/Year: U:=iknown - Total Employees: 1 - Total revenue to the County/Year: Approximately $690 unimproved real estate only ENVIRONMENT t. Air: u. Water: v. Soils: If proposed changes to rear slope exceed a 2 to 1 ratio, owner may be required to professionally certify soil stabilization or construct a retaining wall. w. Noise: x. Signage: Not specified. 6. PLAN CONSISTENCY This area is designated as Core. Mini-warehouse storage is consistent with policy C-5 when separation, screening and buffering are provided to reduce nuisances with a less intensive development. The proposal is inconsistent with policy C-2 due to the lack of a high grade street network and C-4 due to potential hazards to pedestrian and motor traffic, unspecified building design and the critical nature of the rear slope. a. Strengths: (1) Infill nature of proposal. (2) Consistency with Core Policy C-5. (3) Petitioner has proffered to limit permitted uses to mini-warehouses only. b. Weaknesses: (1) Proposal is inconsistent with Core land use policies and guidelines. (2) Uncertainty regarding rear slope. (3) Uncertainty regarding adequate emergency vehicle access. (4) Lack of sufficient parking, especially with respect to loading and unloading vehicles. c. Proffers suggested: (1) Installation of fire hydrants in accordance with County Fire Marshal. (2) No outside recreational vehicle or boat storage shall be permitted. The following are currently in effect for parcel 52.1 and are suggested for parcel 52: (1) To slope the bank. (2) To hydroseed the bank so as to stabilize it with grass and shrubbery cover. (3) To remain responsible for the slope and to correct promptly any erosion that may occur. (4) To create an attractive exterior by painting the metal or covering with natural wood. .. :~ ~ .. ~ °' ~ ~ ' a o h ~~~ * ~ I~ ~~E ~ ~ ~ .I _~~ ~ 3 N i aw alrr on Z UwAWt J JIU or..cwr L lOO.IfS- -- .LGGf/ ~ Z ~~ ~ 1 ~~ ''"' ;~ ~~ ~I ~, ~s ~y ~E _ I E x x 1r .. x ~ .... ~ _ ~ 's "'~ ~ ` r' } ~ + a~ ~ t ~e ~ l t r + ii ~ $e ? ~ a ~~ ~~~ ~R # t ,,i, ~, ''' 1 ~ a .. w~..r..~.. / 117w~7 l aw~r`v~ ' .a~i°~Pi Lp !1°!V_ f I ~ X ~ ~ ~ '~ ~'Ir j1; ~ ~ ( ~' ~ 3 ~ ~~ :+~ ~~ I I a i I ~ ~ ~ ~ *~ 11t~ b N1 ~ ~ ~ m~ >< V ~ ~~ v4 , ~Q ~ 3 ~~ ae z~ a ~~ z a ! o .~ N ~~ ~.•~~ ~ ~ ~ _, ~ ~ ~~ ~ 'a ~t~ ~ ~ ~ r E~ '----~ ~~i ~. - -- =- 7.o01CS- _ j_ mo. a.~ ,_-_ ~~- .~ - ~ .1 ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~' ~: ~r~ 2 ~, ~ ~~: + ~ ~ 0 ~;, ~ 8 ~ ~ I~ o~ ~ i ~'~ ~ g) ~ ' ~~_ J i 3 V ~- ~~/ I Alp ~ a9 g • -~--- 7.00_IfC-- ~" h ( . ? • ~ L_ :. :i r: =i ti ! ~ ~6~ 8 ~~ II 3j ,a R~ ~~! ~~ I ~ __ a . ~ ~ ~ ~~ a-~ s ~ ~ die ~ a_ _ E~, ~ 4.E- ~ r ~ I ~~ f ~ ., :a~ ~i1i3 ~6i ~~6E ~t #:~~ I ~ _~ '~~ L~ i 1 ~~"s i ii ~ ~ i ~ !; e _ M i a ~. .a ~~ ~; 1i ~'~ ~ax! t~ ~ rti ~€~ji ~:~ i90s'los R~«W'L•Ma^o I I = Rj Iii t_ ii ~ ~ ~ 3 ;' #~ 3E tli~ !R! !~a i~_ 3~s~ 91 3- 190 -~ NORTB c -~a- ~•.. . , .c-" ,~, • ~ ' 's~ r JT3! J)b ~ ~ 0 2i _ 14 ~ 12 . !G-tf i f r .an ' Tq~ N . J o„ • ,. ' _ •w o ' ~ ~ 2 • !~ _ ~ J111t ~ ~ ' J _ • ~ ! f~ ~• G ts~ ti~ ,~ O Y~ ~~ • p p/~ ~ ~ 10 )F - -' r ..,,~ ,. •a nN 3 lilt ' ltt~ .. ~ lt~t 23 r 24 ~ 26 27 ~28 ~ 30 3t ~ ~i • J~tO ~ t 00 '. 1 O 41 0.6~ ~c , a ~. S8 Dt Y1d ~ ti~ Sn6 ~ ~. '. ,: 4S ~ ~ ~~ v~a+r Cart ~~ .`' '\ .' ` ~~ 3 P \ ~'- ~ ~ / o ~. S S21 ~ ~ \ lf/S~ . ?~' . p~ 1 48 ~' ' S~ t0 a SI ~ ' .liA ~(0~ ~~ 63 A / dyi ; Jam/ JiS/ / ~ tiv N / / st~2 ~ _ r sa ~ . / ~ .~ / ~ - - .jr ~ /.~ * At ~s . ` . J - ~ _ BRAMBLETON STORAGE OORPORATION COM1rlUNITY SBRVICBS ANDDSVBLOPMBNT B-2 TO M-1 (PARCEL 52) AMEND CONDITIONS (PARCEL 52.1) 190 -~{ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, JANUARY 23, 1990 ORDINANCE TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A 1.016 ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED GENERALLY BEHIND 3707 AND 3655 BRAMBLETON AVENUE (TAX MAP NOS. 77.09-4-52 AND 77.09-4- 52.1) IN THE WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF B- 2 TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF M-1 WITH CONDITIONS UPON THE APPLICATION OF BRAMBLETON STORAGE CORPORATION WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on December 19, 1989, and the second reading and public hearing was held January 23, 1990; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on January 3, 1990; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing 1.016 acre, as described herein, and located generally behind 3707 and 3655 Brambleton Avenue, (Tax Map Numbers 77.09-4-52 and 77.09-4-52.1) in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of B- 2, General Commercial District, to the zoning classification of M- 1, Light Industrial District. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of Brambleton Storage Corporation. 3. That the applicant has voluntarily proffered in writing the following conditions which the Board of Supervisors hereby accepts: .. ~5a-y (1) The property will be developed in substantial compliance with the concept plan by T. P. Parker dated November 20, 1989 for Parcel 77.09-4-52 and dated December 8, 1989 for Parcel 77.09-4-52.1. (2) The rezoned property will be used only for the purpose of constructing and operating mini- warehouses thereon. (3) Applicant agrees to install such fire hydrants as are necessary in accordance with the requirements of the County Fire Marshal. (4) The property will not be utilized for any form of outside storage. (5) Applicant agrees to slope the bank at the rear of the property in accordance with the requirements of the County Engineer; to hydroseed the bank so as to stabilize it with grass, shrubbery or other appropriate cover; and to remain responsible for the maintenance of the slope; and to promptly correct any erosion that may occur. (6) Applicant agrees to create an attractive exterior by painting the metal of the proposed building or covering the same with natural wood. 4. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: BEGINNING at a point located at the southeast corner of the property conveyed by Southern Land Company to F. Earl Frith designated as Parcel I in a deed dated January 5, 1981, said parcel being located at the northeast corner of the property of Charles R. Simpson and Naomi G. Simpson; thence with the property of F. Earl Frith, N. 32 deg. 00' W. (heretofore erroneously cited as N. 32 deg. 00' E.) 110.0 feet to a point located on the line of the 14.68 acre tract conveyed to Southern Land Company; thence with same, N. 58 deg. 00' E. 295.0 feet to a point; thence S. 32 deg. 00' E. 150.0 feet to a point located on the line of the property of Thompson & Flora Investments; thence with the property of Thompson & Flora Investments, Brambleton Hardware and Franklin Land Company, N. 58 deg. 00' W. 295.0 feet to a point located on the line of the property of Charles R. Simpson and Naomi G. Simpson; thence with the same, N. 32 J5o-~f deg. 00' W. 40.0 feet to the place of BEGINNING BEING a part of the same property conveyed to F and D Land Company by deed dated February 13, 1981, recorded in Deed Book 1166, page 164 in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia; and TOGETHER WITH easements, in common with others, for ingress and egress to and from the above-described property as described in Deed of Easement dated June 19, 1980, recorded in Deed Book 1147, page 745, and Deed of Vacation of Easement and Establishment of a New Easement dated January 9, 1987, recorded in Deed Book 1254, page 988, subject to a partial release of easement dated June 29, 1984, recorded in Deed Book 1208, page 1753. 5. That the effective date of this ordinance shall be January 23, 1990. ., ,..:A ':_ I is ."_. G :J ,. ~:LL~-~'~i f=riJ U ~ - ,. - I .1 . I .i _ `~ ,_ 1 ~ : r :'~ L ... .. „ r: ..i i Y .,~- _ .~~.r..i: --f r-l,.-,V, I~ ..i ~ iJ1~~I~,;..;~;, l t ~ I i ice. ~/ t _J i . ~.J i. .J , : i_ t.~ ) r r i ~:Tt'i.J:.l~~u Neil.' ( ~.. ,-.. .. , ...~, ,:, i~,,, 1 ,:=~1 i~~~ ~. i~ ~-~,,L~~i~~ \' ~ ... ., ', L iJ' w F. .~ J f H i ~ _ L 1 5 ,. `r tl !~i.Ji'~i' 1 Irv i 1 i. J 1 ~1 1 ;_ .~ f 4 1 -~ J L v 1 ~. Y -. ~. ~. i.- ~ ! l~;- ~' ~ rl ^-i I ., :~ )'0/71 ._ J r_ S,~ ri i ~ i ._ ~ ~ • i o I ' 1 l i r1 i :: Y ~,; ;- ,J %w ' ~ L .., .~ 'y - ~~.:~~~ ~ LEGAL NOTICE ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, January 23, 1990 fn the Com- munity Room of the Roanoke County Administration Cen- ter, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, Roanoke, VA, on the petition of Brambleton Storage Cargo- ration to amend proffered conditions on a 1.01 acre tract in accordance with a concept plan dated November 10, 1989 and to conditionally rezone a 1.016 acre tract from 8.2 to M-1 ~ to construct mini-warehouses, located generally behind 3707 and 3655 Brambleton Avenue, Windsor Hilis Magisterial Dis- trict. A copy of this application is available for inspection in the DeDartmenT of Planning and Zoning, 3738 Brambleton Ave- nue, Roanoke, VA. Dated` January 4, 1990 Mary H. Allen, Clerk (10852) AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, JANUARY 23, 1990 ORDINANCE 12390-9 TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A .68 ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED AT 4920 COVE ROAD (TA% MAP NO. 37.17-O1-OS) IN THE CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DIBTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF B- 2 TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF M-1 WITH CONDITIONS IIPON THE APPLICATION OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICES INDIISTRIES INC. WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on December 19, 1989, and the second reading and public hearing was held January 23, 1990; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on January 3, 1990; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing .68 acre, as described herein, and located at 4920 Cove Road, (Tax Map Number 37.17-01-05) in the Catawba Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of B-2, General Commercial District, to the zoning classification of M-1, Light Industrial District. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of Professional Services Industries Inc. 3. That the applicant has voluntarily proffered in writing the following conditions which the Board of Supervisors hereby accepts: (1) No outside storage of materials. (2) Cosmetic improvements to the exterior of the building. BEING a part of the same property c William Kenney by deed dated July which said deed is recorded aforementioned Clerk's Office in 926, page 533. 5. That the effective date of this January 23, 1990. :onveyed to 26, 1971, in the Deed Book ordinance shall be On motion of Supervisor Johnson, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None ABSTAIN: Supervisor McGraw A COPY TESTE: ~ • ~'-~/ Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: ~~le Arnold Covey, Director, Development & Inspections Terry Harrington, Director, Planning John Willey, Director, Real Estate Assessment Paul Mahoney, County Attorney /9o-S PETITIONER: PROFESSIONAL SERVICES INDUSTRIES INC. CASE N[,II~ER: 7-1/90 Planning Commission Hearing Date: January 3, 1990 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: January 23, 1990 A. REQUES"P Petition of Professional Services Industries Inc. to conditionally rezone a .68 acre tract from B-2 to M-1 to permit storage and fabrication of metal products, located at 4920 Cove Road, Catawba Magisterial District. B. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION There was no opposition to the request. C. SIGNIFICAN`T' IMPACT FACTORS 1. Comprehensive Plan: 1985 Comprehensive Development Plan has placed this area within a Transition land use category. The proposed rezoning from B-2, General Commercial to M-1, Light Industry is not consistent with the land use types, principals, and guidelines specified in the Transition category. Land uses encouraged within the Transition category include: office and institutional uses, retail establishments, and moderate to high density residential uses. Those land uses permitted in the M-1, Light Industry zoning district are generally incompatible with the land uses specified above. With regard to the petitioner's request, those aspects of the proposal which relate to retail sales of heating and air conditioning systems are consistent with the Transition category. It is the light fabrication of duct materials which is inconsistent with the plan policies. However, due to the scale of the petitioner's request and the fact the petitioner has proffered conditions which prohibit outside storage of materials, this proposal should have minimal impact on neighboring land uses. D. PROFFERED CONDITIONS 1. No outside storage of materials. 2. Cosmetic improvements to the exterior of the building. 3. Plant new shrubs in front of the building. 4. The property will be used primarily for the sale of heating and air conditioning systems and guttering and related components, and for the inside storage and fabrication of materials incidental to such sales and for office, achniniadministrative anct other purposes reasonably related to the activities above described. 5. The total area of all business signs on the property will not at any one time exceed the sum of 1.25 sq.ft. for each lineal foot of street frontage and in no event more than 300 sq.ft., regardless of the number of lineal feet of street frontage. E. CONA"IISSIONER' S MOTION, VOTE AND REASON Mr. Winstead moved to approve the petition with proffered conditions. The motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Winstead, Witt, Robinson, Massey, Gordon NAYS: None ABSENT: None F. DISSENTING PERSPECTI(lE None G. A'IT~Cf~IENI'S l Concept Plan (8~" x 11") Vicinity Map ($~" x 11") Staff Report Other Terrance Harrington, S retary Roanoke County Planni g Commission ~ q~_s STAFF REPORT CASE NUMBERe 7-1/90 .r,~-PETITIONER~ Professional Services Indust. REVIEWED BYe Dale Castellow DATES January 3, 1990 Petition of Professional Services Industries, Inc. to conditionally rezone a .68 acre tract from B-2, Business to M-1, Light Industry to permit storage and fabrication of metal products, located at 4920 Cove Road, in the Catawba Magisterial District. 1. NATURE OF REQUEST a. Conditional request to rezone a .68 acre tract, including an existing structure approximately 2,768 square feet in size, to operate a heating and air conditioning sales office and service warehouse and-shop. 2. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS a. The M-1, Light Industry District per~its a variety of industrial land uses including assembly of appliances and electronic devices, manufacturing of products from ceramics, plastics and other similar materials, as well as warehousing and veterinary hospitals. Provided a special exception is granted, general commercial uses, including day care centers, directly supportive of area industrial facilities are permitted as well. Petitioner is requesting a change in zoning to accommodate an accessory warehouse and service area. Petitioner proposes to store materials on site and in some instances, fabricate duct work for heating and air conditioning systems. Petitioner has proffered conditions which state that cosmetic improvements will be made to the existing structure, including new shrubs along the front of the building. In addition, petitioner has proffered conditions which prohibit outside storage of materials. Staff recommends the petitioner proffer that the property will be specifically used as heating and air conditioning sales office and service shop. Future use of the site for any other industrial use would be contingent upon modification of proffered conditions. 3. SITE CHARACTERISTICS a. Topography: Flat. b. Ground Covers 31te is fully developed with an existing structure and paved parking facilities. 4. AREA CHARACTERISTICS r~~ a. Future Growth Priority: Situated within the Peters Creek Community Planning Area, this has been designated as a high growth area. b. General area is developed with commercial land uses. 5. LAND USE IMPACT ASSE33MENT Rating: Rate each factor according to the impact of the proposed action. Use a scale of 1 through 5. 1 ~ positive impact, 2 - negligible impact, 3 - manageable impact, 4 - disruptive impact, 5 - severe impact, and N/A - not applicable. RATING FACTOR COMMENTS LAND USE COMPATIBILITY 4 a. Comprehensive Plan: 1985 Comprehensive Development Plan has placed this area within a Transition land use category. The proposed rezoning from B-2, General Commercial to M-1, Light Industry is not consistent with the land use types, principals, and guidelines specified in the Transition category. Land uses encouraged within the Transition category includes office and institutional uses, retail establishments, and moderate to high density residential uses. Those land uses permitted in the M- 1, Light Industry zoning district are generally incompatible with the land uses specified above. With regard to the petitioner's request, those aspects of the proposal which relate to retail sales of heating and air conditioning systems are consistent with the Transition category. It is the light industrial aspects of the proposal, such as the storage and fabrication of duct materials, which is inconsistent with the plan policies. However, due to the scale of the petitioner's request, and the fact the petitioner has proffered conditions which prohibit outside storage of materials, this proposal should have minimal impact on neighboring land uses. 2 b. Surrounding Lands The site is bordered by the Exxon Station on Peter's Creek Road and the C&P Telephone Communication Center on Cove Road. A convenience store and Cedar Lawn Memorial Gardens are located across from the site on Cove Road. ~ c. Neighboring Area: General commercial, institutional, office and some residential along Cove Road. 3 d. Site Layout: Site is developed with approximately 7 parking stalls along the front of the site with additional space in the rear for equipment and service vehicles. A bay for delivery of equipment and supplies is located in the rear of the site. 2 e. Architectures Existing structure is in need of repair. f. Screening and Landscaping: Since site plan review will not be required, .additional screening and buffering will not be necessary. 1~~-~ ~~± g ALA h . 3 i. 3 2 3 j• k. Amenities Natural Amenities: TRAFFIC Street Capacities Traffic counts conducted in 1986 revealed a volume of 2,350 vehicles per day along this segment of Cove Road. Based on ITE trip generation rates for light industrial land uses, the proposed use would generate approximately 50 vehicle trips per day. This estimate is based on average weekday vehicle trip ends for 1,384 square feet of commercial space and 1,384 square feet of light industry or warehouse space. Circulations Primary access to the site is from Cove Road. Secondary access can be gained from Peter's Creek Road adjacent to the Exxon station. UTILITIES Water: The staff of the Roanoke County Department of Utilities advises that adequate water flow is presently available on site. 1. Sewers The staff of the Department of Utilities advises that adequate sewer facilities are located on site. Staff further •advises that prior to occupying the building, petitioner will be required to meet the provisions of the County's Sewer Use Standards. At a minimum this will entail construction of a sampling manhole on the existing sewer lateral where it crosses the property line. 3 m. N/A n. 2 0. 2 p. N/A q. ~ r. DRAINAGE Basin: No problems noted. Floodplain: PUBLIC SERVICES Fire Protection: The Fire and Rescue staff advise their department would have no problem in providing fire and emergency services to this site. Rescue: See "o" above. Parks and Recreation: Schools: TAB BASE l ~~ -.~ _ S. - Land and Improvement Value, - Taxable Gross Sales/Year, - Total Employees, - Total Revenue to the County/Year, Unknown ENVIRONMENT 2 t. Air: 2 u. Water, N1A v. Soils, 2 w. Noise, 3 x. Signage, Staff recommends the property owner proffer that on- premise signage will not exceed 1.5 square feet per one foot of linear road frontage or 300 square feet on the entire site. 6. PLAN CONSISTENCY This area is designated as Transition. Petitioner's request is inconsistent with the land use plan map and applicable policies. Petitioner proposes to operate a sales establishment with accompanying warehousing and light fabrication. Despite the fact the proposed use is inconsistent with plan policies, impact on neighboring land uses should be minimal. 7. STAFF EVALUATION a. Strengths: (1) The proposed use would result in improving an existing structure which is in a state of disrepair. (2) Petitioner has proffered that there will be no outside Storage of materials. b. Weaknesses: (1) Proposal is inconsistent with the land use policies specified in the Transition land use category. c. Proffers Suggested: (1) Staff recommends the petitioner proffer that the property will be specifically used as heating and air conditioning sales office and service shop. Future use of the site for any other industrial use would be contingent upon modification of proffered conditions. ~' ~' , • As 4c ~ ~~ ~8 ~ . ~ O r V __ "^^ LU 1 -- --~ SrFRVI~E STq T lti ~_ IAN 0 VE . --- .o = ~pAD !_ ~ ~ 1 ' ~ i ~ ~ ~~ ~~~~ ~ _ BANK 1 ~ , ~ j ~~ ~S test ~ " ~ 1 ~ , 1 . ~. E ~_ ~. ~ ~ _~~ oPP1NG 5 1 ;~~ ; SN ~ 1 ~. • +'i' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. isr t ~ ~ 4 ~ 1 h . ~ ; ,1_- ~'-~ ~ ; stmt i ; ~ t _J 1 ~ C.L,s. i ~ ~ i ~ c 1 1 ~ ~ 1 ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ - -J 1 yj ~ ~ . ~~_ ..-~ 1 1 ~ ~ 1 ~'~ ~~~- NORTB ~_ . a ` ---_ h ~~ ?~oo . ~_~ ~_, ~ ~~ ~~ ~ '~ ~~% COMMUNITYSBRVICBS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES INDUSTRIES INC. AND DBYBLOPMBNT B-2 TO M-1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, JANUARY 23, 1990 ORDINANCE TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A .68 ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED AT 4920 COVE ROAD (TAX MAP NO. 37.17-01-05) IN THE CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF B-2 TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF M-1 WITH CONDITIONS UPON THE APPLICATION OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICES INDUSTRIES INC. WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on December 19, 1989, and the second reading and public hearing was held January 23, 1990; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on January 3, 1990; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing .68 acre, as described herein, and located at 4920 Cove Road, (Tax Map Number 37.17-01-05) in the Catawba Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of B-2, General Commercial District, to the zoning classification of M-1, Light Industrial District. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of Professional Services Industries Inc. 3. That the applicant has voluntarily proffered in writing the following conditions which the Board of Supervisors hereby accepts: (1) No outside storage of materials. (2) Cosmetic improvements to the exterior of the building. ~~~~~ (3) Plant new shrubs in front of the building. (4) The property will be used primarily for the sale of heating and air conditioning systems and guttering and related components, and for the inside storage and fabrication of materials incidental to such sales and for office, administrative and other purposes reasonably related to the activities above-described. (5) The total area of all business signs on the property will not at any one time exceed the sum of 1.25 square feet for each lineal foot of street frontage and in no event more than 300 square feet, regardless of the number of lineal feet of street frontage. 4. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: BEGINNING at an iron stake on the northwesterly right-of-way line of Peters Creek Road, Virginia Highway Route 117, 146.29 feet northeasterly from an angle point at the northwesterly corner of Peters Creek Road and Cove Road, said beginning point being the northeasterly corner of the property of Humble Oil Co.; thence leaving Peters Creek Road and with two lines of the Humble Oil Co. property N. 74 deg. 21' W. 100.0 feet to an iron stake; thence S. 34 deg. 28' 30" W. 165.00 feet to an iron stake on the northerly right-of-way line of Cove Road (Virginia Highway No. 116); thence with same, leaving the Humble Oil Co. property N. 74 deg. 21' W. 113.00 feet to an iron stake, a corner to the property of Mrs. Dorothy H. Whitesell, Mrs. Geraldine H. Waring and Frances H. Easley; thence with same and leaving Cove Road, N. 35 deg. 12' 10" E. 250.0 feet to a point, a new corner; thence with a new division line through the property of William Kenney S. 62 deg. 16' 50" E. 201.59 feet to a point on the northwesterly right- of-way line of Peters Creek Road; thence with said right-of-way line with a curved line to the left, having a radius of 2334.83 feet, a chord bearing and distance of S. 36 deg. 59' 35" W. 40.0 feet and an arc distance of 40.00 feet to the point of BEGINNING, containing 0.0685 acres, as shown on plat made by David Dick & Associates, dated February 26, 1973, which said plat is recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, in Deed Book 968, page 99. 1 ~~ -,~. BEING a part of the same property c William Kenney by deed dated July which said deed is recorded aforementioned Clerk's Office in 926, page 533. 5. That the effective date of this :onveyed to 26, 1971, in the Deed Book ordinance shall be January 23, 1990. ~ ~- ~~ F` .w fBALIN and WALDRON. INC. January 8, 1990 Mr. Timothy W. Gubala Director Economic Development County of Roanoke P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 RE: County Case # 2-1/90 Dear Mr. Gubala: Pursuant to the above referenced case, this letter will serve as F&W Properties II, Inc.'s (co-applicant) formal request to have this item tabled until Februray 1990 Board of Supervisors meeting. This request is made due to numerous staff comments and the time necessary to fully evaluate and address these items. Please do not hesitate to contact me should you have any questions or comments. Sincerely, S en aytor Di ector of Development SMC/kcb P. O. BOX 20069 2917 PENN FOREST BOULEVARD S. W. ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0503 703-774-4415 ACTION # ITEM NUMBER ~ ~ ~ AT A REGULAR MELD AT THE ROANO D OUNTY ADMONISTRATIONO NTER COUNTY, VIRGINIA H MEETING DATE: January 23, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: Public Hearing for Citizen Comment on the 1990-91 Budget COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: At this time the Board will invite comments from citizens on the 1990-91 budget. Staff has not completed revenue or expenditure estimates. Therefore, citizen comment will be directed toward general programs and requests. ~~ ~ ~ Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To Motion by: Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs Eddy Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers ACTION # ITEM NUMBER ~ ~~ AT A REGULAR MEED AT THE ROANO D OUNTY ADMINISTRATION COENTER COUNTY, VIRGINIA HEL MEETING DATE: January 23, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: Request to Schedule Budget Work Sessions COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The following dates have been tentatively scheduled for work sessions on the 1990-91 Budget: February 13, 1990 Budget work session to present FY 1990-91 revenue estimates and to disclose Board priorities. March 13, 1990 Budget work session with Board of Supervisors. Departments present their budget requests funded and unfunded. March 20, 1990 Joint budget work session with Board of Supervisors and (Special Meeting) School Board. County Administrator to present balanced County budget and Superintendent of Schools will present the School budget. March 27, 1990 Budget work session. April 10, 1990 Budget work session. A complete budget calendar is attached. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approving the suggested work session schedule and setting a time for the special meeting on March 20, 1990. ~ ~,~- ~. ~ Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance C~. ~~.~.~ /f ~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ,~ Approved Denied Received Referred To Motion by: ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs Eddy Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers 1/16/90 ~' COUNTY OF ROANOKE PROPOSED BUDGET CALENDAR FY 1990-91 Date November 28, 1989 - December 13, 1989 Activi Preparation by Finance Department of budget packets for distribution to all departments. December 14, 1989 Kick-off budget meeting with all departments for review of budget procedures and distribution of budget packets. December 14, 1989 - Finalization of revenue estimates by Department December 31, 1989 of Finance. January 12, 1990 General review of programs, needs, and priorities with all Department Heads and Constitutional Officers. January 20, 1990 Board of Supervisors meet to establish FY 1990-91 budget priorities. January 2, 1990 - Preparation by the Finance Department of January 19, 1990 departmental targets. January 22, 1990 Distribution of targets to all department heads and Constitutional Officers. January 23, 1990 Public hearing to allow citizen discussion on the overall budget. February 2, 1990 Deadline for submission of departmental budgets. February 5, 1990 - Finance staff to review departmental budgets. February 16, 1990 February 13, 1990 Budget Work Session to present FY 1990-91 revenue estimates and to disclose Board priorities. February 19, 1990 - Departmental budgets to be reviewed with March 2, 1990 Department Heads, Assistant County Administrators, Constitutional Officers, and the County Administrator. ~-/ Date Activi March 9, 1990 Final version of departmental budgets submitted to the Finance Department (including unfunded requests.) March 13, 1990 Budget Work Session with Board of Supervisors. Departments present their budget requests funded and unfunded. March 13, 1990 Public hearing to allow citizen discussion on real estate, personal property, machinery and tools tax rates. March 20, 1990 Joint Budget Work Session with Board of (Special Meeting) Supervisors and School Board. County Administrator to present a balanced County budget and Superintendent of Schools will present the School budget. March 27, 1990 Budget Work Session. March 30, 1990 School Superintendent to deliver School budget to County Administrator. April 10, 1990 Adoption of 1990-91 real estate, personal property, machinery and tools tax rates. April 10, 1990 Budget Work Session. April 24, 1990 Adoption of budget. First reading of Budget Appropriation Ordinance. May 8, 1990 Second reading of Budget Appropriation Ordinance. Adoption of Budget Appropriation Ordinance. May 25, 1990 Adopted budget printed and distributed to Department Heads. May 25, 1990 - Preparation of budget book for printing. July 13, 1990 July 16, 1990 - Budget book sent to printers. July 27, 1990 August 6, 1990 Budget book submitted to Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA). ,. Notes: -~ a. Schools must submit their budget by April 1, 1990. The governing body may accept by May 1, 1990, or within 30 days after receiving estimate of funds. b. A notice announcing the public hearing on a tax rate must be published seven and fourteen days prior to the date of the hearing. c. A notice announcing the public hearing for the budget must be published at least ten days prior to the hearing. d. A notice announcing the public hearing for the change in real estate assessments must be published at least seven days prior to the hearing. e. A notice of availability of the approved budget must be published no more than 30 days after the budget is approved by the Board of Supervisors. ,r. ACTION # ITEM NUMBER ~ ~ ~ -- AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE MEETING DATE- January 23, 1990 OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER AGENDA ITEM; Public Hearin Construction Plan (1990-1996) g For Secondary Road, Six Year COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ' L I ' ~' ' 7 `-~+-"!; /lia. r'c ; ~1 y `• , ./~.'t< ~-'L-t?7'~. ~ .a ?. ~9~fsr /CiY, .%5. ;~~~,~,~.:,,//j ~" ~-~..... 2 ~ -l.!~tCi-7-. :r,...y Sy..r~C.. rz aL.. o~: // G-v ~~` ~.~~~- ~ .7 ~~7~~"v„~;.,4~ ,iCr. ...t ~~ i't-~ 1.c.~.~,-T~ ~L~ ~{~, "Ci BACKGROUND y/ SUMMARY OF INFORMATION The Engineering Department Staff, along with VDOT Staff have prepared a Preliminary Plan for the Secondary Road Six Year Construction Plan for 1990 thru 1996, made it available to the public, and submitted it to the Board accordance to Section 33.1-70.01 of the State CodervtherBoard is required to conduct a public hearin public input. This g on this plan to receive accordance with the requibementseoflthe StatebCode,advertised in ALTERNATIVES AND IMPACTS Conducting the public hearing to County Funds. involves no financial impact STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors conduct the Public Hearing on the Secondary Road Six Year Construction Plan (1990-1996) to receive public input concerning this matter. ~~e- SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: Phillip T. Henry, .E. Elmer C. Hodge Director of Engineering County Administrator --------------------------ACTION------- VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Eddy Denied ( ) Received ( ) Johnson Referred McGraw To Nickens Robers FP ANA, F .p a2 C~,a~~t~ ~ aar~ ,~~r~rt~r ~ ~~ 18 '~ 88 B~sQUfCENTEtiN~p~ COMMUNITY SERVICES AND DEVELOPMENT ABururi/ulBcginning ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT /~~' ~ PHILLIP T. HENRY. P.E. DIRECTOR MEMO T0: Board of Supervisors and Staff FROM: Phillip Henry, Director of Engineering !~~~ DATE: January 18, 1990 SUBJECT: Secondary System, Six Year Construction Plan The following information will hopefully be of assistance in your review of the subject plan: A. Summary Information on Plan B. Six Year Plan for 1990 - 96 with Location Maps C. Six Year Plan for 1988 - 94 D. Additional projects to be considered - This list includes concerns or projects discussed by VDOT or County personnel during the last two years. P.O. BOX 29800 ~ ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24018-0798 • (703) 772-2080 SUMMARY INFORMATION OF PROPOSED SECONDARY SYSTEM SIR YEAR CONSTRUCTION PLAN 1990-96 (1990-91) FUNDING I. SIX YEAR PLAN FORMAT The Public Hearing and the adoption of the Secondary System Six Year Construction Plan will address two basic issues. A. The listing of projects to be considered for future construction and, B. The funding priority established on these projects for the fiscal year of 1990-1991. The Plan is setup in a specific format to address various State Statutes requirements as well as VDOT funding provisions. The following is a summary of these various categories. 1. COUNTYWIDE CONSTRUCTION ITEMS: The total cost of $989,910 is based on an estimated expenditure of approximate $198,000 per year for the six year period. This category includes such items as traffic service, pipe installation at private driveways, survey and preliminary engineering, fertilization and seeding, and Rural Addition. Rural Addition is allocated $106,000 per year and is for the upgrade of private roads to secondary systems standards. The remaining items are used by VDOT Personnel to upgrade facilities along existing roads. 2. INCIDENTAL CONSTRUCTION: The total cost of $1,080,000 is based on a yearly expenditure of $ 180,000. Incidental Construction items are projects that can be planned and constructed during the fiscal year. Generally these projects are plant mix overlay of existing secondary roads to improve the road stability or to address specific safety concerns. The following projects are proposed for Incidental Construction: a. Plant Mix of Route 1433 (Cedar Crest Road) and Route 1438 (Crosstimbers Trail) to improve the road stability. These roads are located off of Wood Haven Road in the vicinity of the Falls Development. A-1 b. Plant Mix of Route 1536 (Embassy Drive) from Greenridge Road - NCL Roanoke to the end of the street to address drainage concerns and pavement stability, and located in the Montclair Subdivision. c. Plant Mix of Route 832 (Overbrook Drive) and Route 833 (Chelesa Street) to improve the road width and road stability. These streets are located in the southern portion of the County adjacent to the City of Roanoke in the area of Grandin Road Extension and Willowlawn Road. d. Plant Mix of Route 1336 (Warwood Drive) and Route 1337 (Bear Ridge Circle) to improve the road stability. These streets are located west of 419 and off of Sugarloaf Mountain Road. e. Plant Mix of Route 1082 (Toddsbury Drive) to improve the road surface and to address drainage concerns. Toddsbury Drive is located in east county in the Falling Creek Subdivision. C. MAJOR PROJECTS• The major portion of each years' funding is allocated to the numbered projects category. Federal and State funding requirements as well as State Statutes place certain requirements on the allocation of funding in this category. 1. VDOT is required to have allocated 70~ of the estimated construction cost to a project before it can be advertised. In addition VDOT has one year after the completion of a project to fully fund the total expenses. On page 2 and 3 of the plan, six projects are listed that need funding because the been completed. Nelms Lane Project has additional funding in order forRothe 840) requires advertised during the coming fiscal Pr°ject to be year. 2. Each year a small percentage of the secondary funds have to be allocated to the upgrade of existing gravel secondary roads. On page 3, Boones Chapel Road, Willow Branch Road and Dawnwood Road are gravel roads which have a minimum of 50 vehicles per day, and therefore, qualify for this funding. The funding level for the 1990-91 fiscal year is $38,433. A-2 II. COMPARISON TO PREVIOUS SECONDARY SYSTEM SIX YEAR CONSTRUCTION PLAN A. The proposed Secondary System Plan for numbered projects is the same as the 1988-94 Plan with the exception that staff is recommending that two projects on Yellow Mountain Road be deleted. These two projects start at the ECL of Roanoke and extend approximately 2 miles southward. We believe that this section of Yellow Mountain Road has reasonably good surface and alignment for the projected traffic, as compared with other roads. In addition, concerns due to the possible location of the Eastern Circumferential Road have changed during the past two years. III. FUNDING LEVEL: A. Projected funding for 1990-91 is $2,445,851. The estimated funding level for the six year period for 1990-96 is $14,500,700. B. The proposed plan, due to increased cost estimates, does approximate the total available funding for the next six years. However, some additional projects could be added to the plan, since it is allowable to carry a balance beyond the six year period. This balance has generally been in the range of 1/2 year of funding. IV. LEGEND: A. Abbreviations: Non FAS - Non Federal Aid Secondary Road FAS - Federal Aid Secondary Road TC - 380 - Traffic count of 380 vehicles per day (10) - Project is proposed as 10th priority. A-3 ~ Rio -~ Board of Supervisors Roanoke County Commonwealth of Virginia 3738 Brambleton Ave., S.W. Roanoke, VA 24018 HAND-DELIVERED January 23, 1990 Dear Members: On numerous occasions, I have contacted the Department of Highways (VDOT) to complain about the condition of our road (State Road 614) otherwise known as Boones Chapel Road. This road is presently dirt and gravel which has very poor drainage capability. In some places, the road is very narrow with very little room for cars to pass each other. It is especially dangerous to drive around the sharp curve located on our section of 614. The VDOT has made an on-site investigation of Route 677 (Willow Branch Road) which branches off Route 614. They also took a transit count at the first intersection of Route 677 and 614 and again on Route 677 which leads to the proposed landfill site. It is my understanding that the daily traffic count was recorded at 70. The count for Route 677 was 57. Since I last addressed the Board, the VDOT and the County Administrator's office have agreed to accept bids for highway construction on Route 614 and Route 677. During the period 1990-1991, an estimate of $36-38,000 will be allocated for the first structural changes necessary for the roads to be paved and widened (exactly 3/10's of a mile). With this in mind, there are several questions I must ask the Board: 1. Why has the County/VDOT deemed it proper to allow the beginning of Route 614 and the last leg of Route 677 to be paved and not the remainder of Route 614? 2. How much more would it cost to straighten out the bad curve on Route 614 as well as widen and pave the road in its entirety? 3. Can the County/VDOT justify the loss of tax revenues, if the last part of Route 614 is not widened and paved? (I will have further questions in this regard if the road plans are not revised to include all of Route 614.) 4. Is it fair to the residents who live at the end of Boones Chapel Road to have them suffer more years of damage to their vehicles as well as a possible serious accident? Consideration for road improvement in our section of the County is long overdue and I can only hope that you will think about our situation long and hard and make a favorable decision for all concerned. Sincerely, - /~ ~ ~~ L~~FL~c -- Roxey Fisher 8691 Boones Chapel Road Boones Mill, VA 24065 ~ 90-g ~ P AN ,~.~ ~ ~ ~ z ~ °v a~ Cn,a~tn~ ~~ ~~~~~~~ 18 ~~ 88 8~8QUICENTENN~P~ COMMUNITY SERVICES AND DEVELOPMENT ABututifitlBeginning ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT PHILLIP T. HENRY, P.E. DIRECTOR MEMO TO: Board of Supervisors and Staff FROM: Phillip Henry, Director of Engineering ~~ DATE: January 18, 1990 SUBJECT: Secondary System, Six Year Construction Plan The following information will hopef%lly be of assistance in your review of the subject plan: A. Summary Information on Plan B. Six Year Plan for 1990 - 96 with Location Maps C. Six Year Plan for 1988 - 94 D. Additional projects to be considered - This list includes concerns or projects discussed by VDOT or County personnel during the last two years. P.O. BOX 29800 ~ ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 (703) 772-2080 StJrII~fARY INFORMATION OF PROPOSID SECONDARY SYSTEM SIR YEAR CONSTRUCTION PLAN 1990-96 (1990-91) FUNDING I. SIX YEAR PLAN FORMAT The Public Hearing and the adoption of the Secondary System Six Year Construction Plan will address two basic issues. A. The listing of projects to be considered for future construction and, B. The funding priority established on these projects for the fiscal year of 1990-1991. The Plan is setup in a specific format to address various State Statutes requirements as well as VDOT funding provisions. The following is a summary of these various categories. 1. COUNTYWIDE CONSTRUCTION ITEMS: The total cost of $989,910 is based on an estimated expenditure of approximate $198,000 per year for the six year period. This category includes such items as traffic service, pipe installation at private driveways, survey and preliminary engineering, fertilization and seeding, and Rural Addition. Rural Addition is allocated $106,000 per year and is for the upgrade of private roads to secondary systems standards. The remaining items are used by VDOT Personnel to upgrade facilities along existing roads. 2. INCIDENTAL CONSTRUCTION: The total cost of $1,080,000 is based on a yearly expenditure of $ 180,000. Incidental Construction items are projects that can be planned and constructed during the fiscal year. Generally these projects are plant mix overlay of existing secondary roads to improve the road stability or to address specific safety concerns. The following projects are proposed for Incidental Construction: a. Plant Mix of Route 1433 (Cedar Crest Road) and Route 1438 (Crosstimbers Trail) to improve the road stability. These roads are located off of Wood Haven Road in the vicinity of the Falls Development. A-1 b. Plant Mix of Route 1536 (Embassy Drive) from Greenridge Road - NCL Roanoke to the end of the street to address drainage concerns and pavement stability, and located in the Montclair Subdivision. c. Plant Mix of Route 832 (Overbrook Drive) and Route 833 (Chelesa Street) to improve the road width and road stability. These streets are located in the southern portion of the County adjacent to the City of Roanoke in the area of Grandin Road Extension and Willowlawn Road. d. Plant Mix of Route 1336 (Warwood Drive) and Route 1337 (Bear Ridge Circle) to improve the road stability. These streets are located west of 419 and off of Sugarloaf Mountain Road. e. Plant Mix of Route 1082 (Toddsbury Drive) to improve the road surface and to address drainage concerns. Toddsbury Drive is located in east county in the Falling Creek Subdivision. C. MAJOR PROJECTS: The major portion of each years' funding is allocated to the numbered projects category. Federal and State funding requirements as well as State Statutes place certain requirements on the allocation of funding in this category. 1. VDOT is required to have allocated 70$ of the estimated construction cost to a project before it can be advertised. In addition VDOT has one year after the completion of a project to fully fund the total expenses. On page 2 and 3 of the plan, six projects are listed that need funding because the project has been completed. Nelms Lane (Route 840) requires additional funding in order for the project to be advertised during the coming fiscal year. 2. Each year a small percentage of the secondary funds have to be allocated to the upgrade of existing gravel secondary roads. On page 3, Boones Chapel Road, Willow Branch Road and Dawnwood Road are gravel roads which have a minimum of 50 vehicles per day, and therefore, qualify for this funding. The funding level for the 1990-91 fiscal year is $38,433. A-2 II. COMPARISON TO PREVIOUS SECONDARY SYSTEM SIX YEAR CONSTRUCTION PLAN A. The proposed Secondary System Plan for numbered projects is the same as the 1988-94 Plan with the exception that staff is recommending that two projects on Yellow Mountain Road be deleted. These two projects start at the ECL of Roanoke and extend approximately 2 miles southward. We believe that this section of Yellow Mountain Road has reasonably good surface and alignment for the projected traffic, as compared with other roads. In addition, concerns due to the possible location of the Eastern Circumferential Road have changed during the past two years. III. FUNDING LEVEL: A. Projected funding for 1990-91 is $2,445,851. The estimated funding level for the six year period for 1990-96 is $14,500,700. B. The proposed plan, due to increased cost estimates, does approximate the total available funding for the next six years. However, some additional projects could be added to the plan, since it is allowable to carry a balance beyond the six year period. This balance has generally been in the range of 1/2 year of funding. IV. LEGEND: A. Abbreviations: Non FAS - Non Federal Aid Secondary Road FAS - Federal Aid Secondary Road TC - 380 - Traffic count of 380 vehicles per day (10) - Project is proposed as 10th priority. A-3 PROPOSED SECONDARY SYSTEM SIX YEAR CONSTRUCTION PLAN 1990-1996 (1990-91 FUNDING) B-I PROPOSED SECONDARY SYSTEM SIX YEAR CONSTRUCTION PLAN 1990-1998 (1990-91 FUNDING) DISTRICT: SALEM CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM (IN DOLLARS) i990-91 THRU 1995-98 COUNTY: ROANOKE ?OUTE DESCRIPTION ESTIMATED PREVIOUS ADDITIONAL PROJECTED COMMENTS LENGTH COST FUNDING FUNDING ALLOCATIONS 1990-91 1 COUNTYMIDE 989,910 0 989,910 191,881 PLANT MIX YOUTE 1433 FR: RT 1434 (2A) T0: RT 1438 LENGTH: 0.12 MI (CEDAR CREST RD) ROUTE 1438 FR: RT 828 (28) T0: RT 1436 IENGTH: 0.39 MI (CROSSTINBERS) ROUTE 1538 FR: NCL ROANOKE (RT 829) (2C) T0: 0.03 NI M RT 1120 LENGTH: 0.48 MI (EMBASSY DR- ROUTE 832 FR: RT 833 (2D) T0: 0.10 MI M, RT 831 IENGTH: 0.35 NI (OVERBROOK DR) ROUTE 833 FR: SCL ROANOKE (RT 886) (2E) T0: RT 832 LENGTH: 0.10 NI (CHELSEA ST- ROUTE 1338 FR: RT 892 (2F) T0: 0.08 MI N RT 1331 IENGTH: 0.44 MI (MARMOOD DR) 10,265 31,300 43,308 18,345 2,444 45,165 B-2 PROPOSED SECONDARY SYSTEM SIX YEAR CONSTRUCTION PLAN 1990-91 (1990-91 FUNDING) ROUTE DESCRIPTION LENGTH ESTIMATED COST PREVIOUS ADDITIONAL PROJECTED COMMENTS FUNDING FUNDING ALLOCATIONS 1990-91 ROUTE 1331 (2G- FR: RT 1338 T0: CUL-DE-SAC LENGTH: 0.06 NI (BEAR RIDGE CIR) ROUTE 1082 FR: RT 1018 (2H) T0: 0.14 MI N RT 1093 IENGTH: 0.49 MI (TODDSBURY DR) 2,444 19,699 TOTAL PLANT MIX 180,000 INCIDENTAL(TOTAL) 1,080,000 0 1,080,000 180,000 ROUTE 1083 1083-5001 45,000 0 45,000 45,000 PROJECT COMPLETE FR: N RT 1082 FINANCE DEFICIT YON FA3 T0:0.20 NI S RT 1082 TC: 129 LENGTH: 0.20 NI CONTRACT DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENT (3) (BURNT DUARTER OR.) ROUTE 9840 0840-5801 18,454 46,454 30,000 30,000 ADDITIONAL FINANCING FR: RT 838 REQUIRED, PROJECT BY TC: 3a0 TO: RT 839 ROANOKE COUNTY CONTRACT STORM SEMER DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENT (4- (NELNS LANE) ROUTE 0651 0651-080-228,N501 13,100 63,100 10,000 10,000 PROJECT COMPLETE NON FAS FR: 0.20 NI M RT 220 FINANCE DEFICIT TC: i1 IENGTH: 0,10 NI APPROACHES TO BRIDGE CONTRACT OVER BACK CREEK (5) (MINTER DR) ROUTE !04 0904-080-S40,C501 125,110 1,424 124,348 124,346 PROJECT COMPLETE TC: REALIGN INT. RT 904 FINANCE DEFICIT LENGTH: 0.20 MILES 1189-90 CONTRACT SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS ~ (8) (STARKEY ROAD) B-3 PROPOSED SECONDARY SYSTEM SIX YEAR CONSTRUCTION PLAN 1990-1998 (1990-91 FUNDING) ROUTE DESCRIPTION E8TIMATEO PREVIOUS ADDITIONAL PROJECTED COMMENTS lEN6TH COST FUNDING FUNDING ALLOCATIONS 1990-91 ROUTE 0881 0861-080-202,8883 30,000 0 30,000 30,000 PROJECT COMPLETE FAS MIDEM EXISTING FINANCE DEFICIT TC: 10,508 BRIDBE OVER N1M RR STRUCTURE 1 6180 CONTRACT (11 (ODBEN RD) ROUTE 0839 0639-080-143,C503 1,1)3,140 815,931 291,203 291,203 PROJECT COMPLETE FAS APPROACHES TO BRIDBE FINANCE DEFICIT TC: 294 OVER ROANOKE RIVER lEN6TH: 0.43 MI CONTRACT (8) (rEST RIPER RD) ROUTE 0839 0639-080-143,8828 1,223,918 839,158 384,218 384,218 FINANCE COMPLETE FAS BRIDBE OVER ROANOKE FINANCE DEFICIT TC: 294 RIPER; STRUCT. !8052 CONTRACT (9) ROUTE 0814 INN) FAS TC: 10 CONTRACT (10) ROUTE 0811 NON FAS TC: 51 CONTRACT (it) ROUTE 0691 NON FAS TC: 56 CONTRACT (12) (rEST RIVER RO) NUMBERED PROJECTS 0814-080-P24, N501 FR: N RT 811 T0: 8 RT ill LENBTH: 0.30 MI MID,BR,DR,STAB. t ST (BOONS CNAPEI RD) 0611-080-P34,N501 FR: S RT 614 T0: 1.30 NI N lENBTH: 1.30 MI rI0,8R,DR,8TA8. d ST (rluor eRAANNCH Rol 0691-080-P41,N601 FR: 0.46 NI 6 RT 132 T0: 1.81 NI 8 RT 132 LENBTH: 1.23 MI rIO,Nt,OR,8TA8. d ST (OArNM000 ROAD ) 139,000 88,135 50,865 38,433 PROJECT ON HOLD UNPAVED ROAD FUND 280,000 164,000 98,000 0 PROJECT ON VOID UNPAVED ROAD FUND 190,000 41,684 148,418 0 INPAYED ROAD FUND B-4 PROPOSED SECONDARY SYSTEM SIX YEAR CONSTRUCTION PIAN 1l90-1996 (1990-91 FUNDINS- ROUTE DESCRIPTION lEN6TN ESTIMATED PREVIOUS ADDITIONAL PROJECTED COMMENTS COST FUNDING FUNDING AIIOCATIONS 1990-91 ROUTE 1832 1832-080-196,CS01 501,000 355,100 151,900 151,900 IN)N FAS FR: RT 111 TC: 2525 T0: RT 1839 lEN6TH: 0.22 MI CONTRACT RECONSTRUCTION (131 (BARRENS RO) 30UTE 0839 0639-080-201,0501 350,901 44,901 308,000 218,000 FAS FR: .30 MIS RT ii TC: 511 T0: RT 849 IENSTN: 0.33 NI CONTRACT RECONSTRUCTION (14) (NEST RIPER RD) ROUTE 0891 0891-080-200,0501 1,991,305 84,805 1,908,500 96,000 MON FAS FR: RT 221 TC: -288 T0: RT 1126 LENGTH: 0.84 NI CONTRACT RECONSTRUCTION (151 (CRYSTAI CREEK) ROUTE 0891 0891-080-200,0502 1,339,339 5,000 1,334,339 140,000 NON FAS FR: RT 1126 TC: 605 T0: RT 813 IENSTN: 0.11 NI C~lTRACT RECONSTRUCTION 118) (CRYSTAL CREEK) ROU1E 0628 0628-080-232,0502 619,134 42,250 631,384 35,600 FINANCE ENGINEERING FAS FR: RT 111 DEFICIT TC: 2263 T0: 0.15 MI Y RT 1831 LENGTH: 0.31 NI COIITNACT RECONSTRUCTION (11) (r000NAYEN RD) ROUTE 0833 0833-080-S31,FS121 108,000 10,000 98,000 0 NOr fA8 CONST GRADE CR08SIN8 TC: 163 INSTAII FU8NIN6 RR FORCES lI0NT8 i SIONAL ARM (11- IAENOIB RO) ' B-5 PROPOSED iE1~NDARY SYSTEM SIX YEAH CONSTRUCTION PIAN tl90-1996 (1990-1i FUNDIN6) ROUTE DESCRIPTION ESTIMATED PREVIOUS ADDITIOMAI PROJECTED COMMENTS LEN6TN COST FUNDIN6 FUNDIN6 AIIOCATIONS 1990-91 ROUTE 0613 0813-080-226,0501 103,695 4,000 699,695 24,126 FINANCE EN6INEERIN, FAS FR: RT 1640 DEFICIT TC: 4281 T0: RT 1882 LEN6TN: 0.358 MI CONTRACT RECONSTRUCTION (30) (MERRIMAN RD) ROUTE 0688 0688-080-229,CS01 801,538 50,000 151,538 15,943 FINANCE ENGINEERING FAS FR: 0.10 NI N RT 681 DEFICIT TC: 2230 TO: RT 220 lEN6TH: 0.91 NI CONTRACT RECONSTRUCTION l31) (YEIION NTN RD) ROUTE 1802 1802-080-248,0501 125,000 6,250 118,150 14,946 FINANCE ENGINEERING NOM FAS FR: RT 221 DEFICIT TC: 500 T0: RT 882 CONTRACT LENSTN: 0.18 NI RECONSTRUCTION (32) ( BUNKER VIII OR) ROUTE 0605 0605-080-193,0501 582,049 34,815 541,114 0 FAS FR: RT 821 TC: 1218 T0: 0.20 MI N ' LENGTH: 0.20 NI CONTRACT RECONSTRUCTION (331 (SANOERSON DR) ROUTE 0823 0623-080-231,0501 800,000 1,000 799,000 0 TC: FR: R111 CONTRACT T0: RT 1861 LENSTN: 0.25 NI RECONSTRUCTION 1341 (FLORIST RD1 ROUTE 0120 0720-080- ,C 40,000 0 40,000 0 FAS FR: 0.20 NI 5! RT 419 TC: l313 CURVE IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT (35) (COIONIAI AYE) B-8 PROPOSED SECONDARY 8YSTEM SIX YEAR CONSTRUCTION PUN 1990-1996 (1990-91 FUNDING) ROUTE DESCRIPTION ESTIMATED PREVIOUS AODIIIONAI PROJECTED COMMENTS LENGTH COST FUNOIMB FUNDING ALLOCATIONS 1990-91 ROUTE Oi28 0628-080-232,C501 112,019 51,500 114,519 0 FAS FR: 0.14 MI Y RT 1438 TC: 1043 T0: RT 1542 LENGTH: 0.48 NI CONTRACT RECONSTRUCTION (24) IMOODHAVEN RD) ROUTE 0601 0601-080-233,C501 1,111,119 52,000 1,125,119 326,211 FINANCE ENGINEERING FAS FR: 0.59 NI S RT 821 DEFICIT TC: 3596 T0: NCl RKE LENGTH: 1.80 MI CONTRACT RECONSTRUCTION (25) (OLD HOILINS RD) ROUTE 1658 1858-080-223,D861 100,000 10,000 90,000 0 N011 FAS FR: INT 1884 TC: 1911 BRIDBE OVER NUDIICK CONTRACT CREEK 12i1 (CRESTHIII DR) ROUTE 1158 1658-080- ,C 32,000 0 32,000 0 NON FAS FR: INT 1864 TC: 1l11 APPROACHES TO BRIDGE CONTRACT OVER NUDIICK CREEK (tl) ICRESTHIII DR) ROUTE 6115 0615-080-230,8011 294,000 4,000 290,000 0 NON FAS BRIDBE OVER BACK TC: 161 CREEK CQNTRACI 1281 (STARLIBHT IANE) ROUTE ON S 0815-080-230,M501 34,038 3,000 31,038 8,038 FINANCE ENGINEERIN NON FAS 0.96 NI S RT 613 DEFICIT TC: 161 APPROACHES TO BRIDBE DYER BACK CREEK CONTRACT (2!) (8TARLIBHT UNE- B-7 pROPOSEO SEC~IDARY SYSTEM SIX YEAR CONSTRUCTION PIAN 1990-1996 (1990-91 FUNOINB) MlEYIOUS ADDIIIONAI PROJECTED COMMENTS ROUTE DESCRIPTION ESTIMATED lENBTH COST FUNDING FUNDING ;99o g;IONS 0633-080-231,C501 FR: RT 904 10: 0.35 MI S RT 904 IENGTH: 0.35 MI RECONSTRUCTION (BENOIS RD) 0180-080- .C FR: 0.15 MI NCl RKE T0: 0.10 NI N RT 1124 LENGTH: 0.28 NI DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENT (COVE RD) 0810-280, , B 0.02 NI S RT 694 REPLACE EXISTING LOM MATER BRIDGE MITN SUB SPAN BRIDGE (LOST MTN RD) 0636,080, ,C FR: 0.05 NI E RT 103 T0: BOTETOURT C l lENBTH: 0.30 NI RECONSTRUCTION (BUDE CREEK) 0168-080- ,C FR: RT 1832 T0: DEAD END LENBTN: 0.14 NI RECONSTRUCTION (Ol8EN AD) 342,000 10,000 332,000 20,000 FINANCE ENGINEERING DEFICIT 120,000 0 120,000 O 95,000 0 95,000 0 620,000 0 620,000 0 500,000 0 500,000 0 B-6 ~~ _ f„ ' '~~ , / FAIL~~K / ~ - . 1~ ~~4~~l~ ~'r~u ~ J ~. /i ~ - I ~~ - „~~~ _ .._ ~ICINITYMAP , ~ __~, NORTS RODTg 1083 BNGINBBRING BURNT QIIARTSS DRIVB DRAINAGB II~ROV)~NT - (3) Q. NORTB ~~ J 47 .. 34 SOAc ~~~~ ~ K _. ,. 30 'i , 3z ,~ s ~-; zs ~, , + /33 ~ ~ ~ • SO -- o n 67 S ~~~ • ~ 72 ' 49 ~ ' ~. `~ ~ ~ ~ . 6S ao'~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~o SS ~ ~ . 64 45 '4 s ~ ~ " ~ ~ ~ p°o ~ ~~ ~ ~ a • ~ i ~ 44 ~ '_ sT as ~ ~ , ~~ :~ ~' M ) / 4t 'p$ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ X61 6 0 ~ ~ s 'y~ i e ~ ~r ~ ~ ,~ i ~ oo Ac ~ ~ 37 ~, a~. ~e ~o ~~a s I' ~~ 4 ~~ 3 J i 77 i iOAs 42" Storm Drain ~ Existin g Sewer Line -; Bows s4o ~~ SNGINB~SRING nxsnrscB n~8ov~rr '(4 NORTS ~~ ~ ~~ ~ \ ~J s 24 wa8Ad01 2 I t DDAcIW \ 4 `~~• BSS Ac ~. 126S4IGI I.OOAC ~ 29SACC1 /1 860 Ac •, k 3 ~ 4/ i ' ~ 39.37Ac 3 2 ssac ~ i 30As 6 7 S 5070Ac I.sSACltI I 66 4t 2 -S .. i c.ry o~.e. '~ ,cr ~ 6 LOOAC e71 ~ z1a • a7~roAClc1 ~ 6 1 21 \ 16\ t'~ 9.1 0 pAC 31 6715At •• M ~~'~.. 36.58 •~~ 3 ~1 + 31,37 A i R T b q ~ .,v „„ d,,,., 7 i 19 13 ,. _ .tiK. ioasc ,,r.• j-"" 714 8 ~ .57 11 OsAC _ ; •sA~101 ,~ 9.1•r .12 s ss Adtl a 2182 Ac / 12 g __~ ~ w4 / 3 SO AC101 q I ,x " IS ' \ /~ a 19 ~• 4 t •12 I f j5 654 ~ •-> r 10 " ~,.-, ~ 16 27.20Ac / 21 ~,~ I6 IS Gi I ;. 6OOAC 2914c 17\ 1SI AC ID) ~.004ID) S n Ae IC 2 6e 219 AC101 i22 Ae ltl / ~ 24 14 -2 e7 Acicl ,, .. .:ti ,,• 6994C Ac .. ~ 004 • ? 2T 25 ~6 3s Ac •Y s004 4 s 3 / ? 26 120AC { .. 21044 / ~, 561 Ac ~ o.wr' • I $ 364 ,~S S 26 4 i zszACtd ..~, 33 3 1233ACK) T y ' 9 8 ,• i 2 ink ~ ~ 76 09Ac s 064 slAe f +110 1914 ,.•,~_ , 192Ae101 a ~' t9Aclt T IOOAcItI .~ TI ~ = es~ Rt. 715 n ~' 34 ~ 1. ssAC I 36.36 Ac Ip ~/~ -~ T2 ~• ~ oo21Acla \ ~ 7 67AC ~ I ~ 782 Ac Ae1o1 ~ 639Ac \ 2 Ac IC- 11.40At ~ IOOAc 3T • 36211k O 11.~ 38 40 ~ ~ • .!7 - ~ - ~Ac - ~ ~- ~ nl.- ~ __ ---- 49 - -- - - --- _ { . _ . - ROUTS 1157 _ _ l BNGINSBRING ~~ DRivs APPROACHES TO BRIDGE OV88 BACK CRBSS CS) ~- NORTB ~~ Q.1 ~\~~./// ~ 1 \ lu ~~ q ~ ~ r, S loin ~O ..r R ~ • ~ O( f ~ } \ // ~ ~ ' Rt. 419 ~ ~.1. / / '~ ~ / ~ . ~ ~ / ~ ~ 11 ~ p 41 b r• ; ' 7 •• / ! • ~ 1 / 1 7.f7 ~[ a ! 7.01 ~[ CI / • ~ / ; 4 4011 ~ • b~ [I ~ 3 ~ . O a ~ / ~ ~' ,' ,„ ~ m ~ ~ w ' LN K 7 ~/4 / • T ~ O 7J { _ ~ - ' / ~ r«~ •LO ~ ~ + s i ~ a» .• w !T ~ • • } ' ~, f074 + T + ' ;j 4' f ~I 4 3 ~° ~ a ' ~ ~. O ~ ' n s « O ~ . ~ri r i IS N ~'0 RO{-1-M \ ' I• • ~. • IT \ i \ N ' ^ • \ ~~• ' - '~' l70Y I I 'y aTOY 1*~ S. K I~4 ~Q q 170 Y ~ ' ` R(JS `~ y s»,k N i TAI 1p ~ 4 i tl/Y eli ~ 0/0¢IOF,I~ ' r ROOTS 904 BNGINBBRING sTAx~Y Roes SAFETY II~ROVBMBNTS (6) Q NORTS ~~ • ~ .. ..; .. 4 ~~~ . ~ ~~ 2 • +' G,,y ° Goo y 3 • ~ e 04 N'i • ` 1 • i . 1 _ 3 1 '~ • 292 ~ tb ea d 7 29i a J r 6 \ s ., ~ I .r ~~ ~ \ ~ z, r,;e ,; .• • ~ '+S'y ., \ 8 137,i' ~ X5,9 • ~ •t •c '-• .~ r •~ • f S ~4 .. ~ , g 156 'S ~~ ~ ; ~ •= IS 10 9 0 r ~ ~ 4 r 15 1 . 1 Os ac 20.3 , . ~ IS.3 ~ o, • ' ` / ',t~1 ,~ h~0 ~15~2 a ~;. ~ as i •o ~a 1N IS.S / ~, ~ 37Ac - - ~ -- .. . _ 1~ - -~ - - - ~ --- - -- ---- -- - - -- SODTB 867 BNGINBBRING onc~x Boen BBIDGB OVF.B LibW RB L7) _1 '~' NORTH --, y~ / _ - 6~2 B~__ f-06T ~~s 7i0 _~ ~ 02~ u o .`~J U ~f 1 o -` re .~ .~ Fi9', / . A.'a1 ~ 996 p'~ 9S ~ !9o~j 6s3 ~ % ' 0 84 7 S~ ' ~ ~o 0 1 _ - ~ ~ ~- o ~• ~ ~ i i ~ I ~~s l F.~ ., M O i ROUTS 639 $NGIIVBBRING i1BST GIVER ROrAD APPROACH TO BRIDGE d STRUCTURB (8) ~ (9) NORTH ~~ 30 ~ ~ zaeo Ae CAwrttM s i ~ ., ~~~ b ~• 800 Ae01 A75 At ~ ~ I1 ` ~ 31 IAO Ae w x0.75 Ae ml 40.48 Ae 1 r r >~ 7250 AcCI. ~ 31 900 Ae 3.46 At ~~ 33 339a<ci .75At 34 ' lA0 AC Rt -..~' 17 4Z SO Ac ~ 28 38.42 ALIG 2QOOAt 3S 22 27 , pus Ac ml 4 zz 49i Ae lc- 4900Ae ~ .... ~s ~~ 21 ..,. i 2896At ,,., I O 24 ~ At I ~ lt96 Ae 26 b0 Ae 2x99 At (o) ' 3108 At p \\\ ~ 422 ~ ••\~~ ' 20 TAOOAt . ~ 41 9.1IAC /424 BODTS 616 BNGINBBRING Boom c~~. Bonn QPGRADS OF GRAVEL SBCONDASY SOAD~ (10) Q NORTB . - ~ . -- y » 731 !)! n 7ouo.. roar "' • y aoo , a2 Inr •oar /~Var » a.nr j 2 Iwil 11 ..«K 20 ~ Isi ae nl 3 „yr V'1Gr0 ' aNro 22 / ~ •1 !S. ~.Sr 3 ! 2 f00r ~° )K 2. _ x +! v r s7it.~ n tr00r / _ 27 'ar f awi.p t .~ =1 {~Nr h ~ I a 1s.r 1 )~ woe r .r ~ tlnrcl ~ f tsoro )) 21 7)#r I »tlf0 ~fi3r t7 fOr / . >• MOOr01 ~ ~~. ) a)OOr n 1/ tawr [~a• if ~ I.w. b S7tr aoortn sera 1` " L f pr3ra 31 n2 .wr _ r'\ •a7r Q /IwK<I wvr 1 s ~ s3c.: ~ 0 1 !~ ~ f 1Yl .t r)~)r ; ~1 Sbr ~ )lOat ~ rN ~ 7 r7 730 r101 N ') Ycl •7O" n atrr )) f `;~w\ ) ~ .onr~ Macro »arlu ~ a~•r \ orrc `• ' x77rsi »vrcl ttoor 1 x a / 27 .~ ~~»rr y ~ % •# N90r ~ •M4~ ~„r 7030Y01 77N4n { ~ ~~! 21 2) ,~ i `0 :aaar „ _ O ~~ ~\. Tsar ` ~ 20 ~ .21 tfisr 1< ~ _ roor ` X27• afar f Oars] ~` ~~ __ .. .. _ _. ..__ _. .__ ~ . _.__ _. _ 7 ._._ .. _~___- - ROIITB 677 BNGINBBRING ~Lto~ BRApca roan OPGRADB OF GRAVEL SBCONDARY ROaD. (11) ~l_ _. ^ .. ^ NORTB ~~^ ~ ~ "'~ 688 Spring. ~~ ~ 888 0 ~ t :~ ~ ~`O` 690 ~`~~ 688 ON 934 9~ j' a r _ ~ P ~ 6S3 ~, ho 690 l 732 691 \ i 854 . I ' ~i J~ ~~ O 9~ MASONS ~ KN09 ~ -- - ~ - - .-_ -----~..-_~ J -~- --- - - - _.- BOUTS 691 BNGINBBRING nn~0on 80AD UPGRADB OF GRAVEL SBCO~ABY SOAR" (12) NORTB .~. ~~ ~ '' e°~. ~~ .g 12 / , // 1 ~ ~ S ' b r' _~ l AIM) ' ; j i j Opp'\~~C', ~`~{~ , ~ ~ y - ,.., - `------ ~ ~ t i~ A ~ ~ Bppris/ C~IY/C/! ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~ I u ~ ~ \ 2 29 I N°~~~os I ~ ~ b e o ~ 3~ 30 \ / ~ I ~ i ~ ~ ~ \ 33 ~pOd ~ ~ \ • 1gt S / ~ a 13 ~i ' . q ~ .~ ~ 24 \ ~ ~~.79 •c / ape \\z\"\~.~y ~~• ~ v ~ \O \ goo ~ ~. ~ \ \ ~ ~ ~ \ ~ \ ~ p 9 6 ~ ~!' ~g ~' ~ ~rjo t - ~ !!~ ~~ ~ F ~ LS4 AC. II SOUTB 1832 BNGINBBRING BnxxBNS goAn ;~ RBCONSTSUCTIOH (13) ; / -- -- --- --- -- - _- - - _ ~i ----~-- ~!- NORTH ~ ' / ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ / ` 46l6AtW Ig ` ` SL43 AC (O // •t SS.00 Ac tDl O / 61 70 Ac (Q ~ ~ ~~ :, ~ i ~ ~° .~ / ~~ 1 ~ ~~ ~~ ,~., \ ~w T 2324 Ar 2S ~ j ~` z3ooA~ / ~ ~ ~ `` sa z2 rt,. sag teiA~ ~ sock ass ~ sir MY~i~ ~ &AC 24 ` qi S7~ ~, cf«.wi / Y~~ ,. ~ W~H b `g4a0 ~. bj9 ~C I ~ I tiQ~ q,~~ s.. ewp ~.oo ' 1.~ ~, c :.~r ROIITS 639 BNGINBBRING WEST xIVBR ROAD BgC08STRIICTION- ~ 14) ~- NORTS ~~ SOi . I ~ a o' `~o ~/ ~ S ° ~ w r°~ 690 ~ c //o o'° 0 63 0 687 0 ~~ 07 SSI ~ ~ Q ~ L a . ~~ ~ ° ~ c ° o t. o~ ~' S o~ 7 2 a _) ~ 0 6i3 o~: 689 ~ 5~8 ° p7 0' 158 S32 ~ e ~ a c i ~.J 56 _ ' ~ 11 n (~~JJ ' O~ /~/ I X656 X61 ~..J ~ / ~,6a6' S•Sl r ~ / ~ / ~ ~. i ~ ~ ~ q,; I ~ I ~ ~` 1 / Sep °' ; ~c ~ 75 • 735 ~.. ~ ' '' ., ~ / '' S \ O`St~ ~ 1 . ZZ~ -St. "'~ .-.~ 688 888 ot• w O/ 1 /~` O •' l •.. - - - G 0 ~• 0 - -~..1. 16 ib t/ ^ ~i w \ 6~3 ~ f ----'------ l A SOUTB 897 BNGINBBRIlVG cxYS~. cass~ RECONSTROCTIOa (IS) --• NORTH BlVG1NBBRlIVO ROIITS 897 CRYSTAL CRESS RECONSTRIICTION (16) NOR?'g ~~ ! -- -rani ~ ~ I ~~ -.-:---- - ~ ~ c 66 , 4 ~~ ~;~ AcBS ' r ~ 'i f 1 ,~ .Q ~l~• ~• .: 12 ~ ~, 65 ~ . 54 '` 4~ »eni` ks. ~ rO P +~ O r 6 ,p ea e ' 3 4 s~ ~ ~ w , ~ y+ a ' 132k '~ • LA ~ i ~ ~ 9 63 =c y~A `~ Y 6 n ~ ••~ ~ ~ • r ,~' ~. ~ q ~ ~ ~ y~ °00 ~ . -~ • 28 `~ ~ 31 « ~~- 49o0c ~` ,, s / / ` e ~ \ %. i ~ q~ 29 ' ~ ~ i i , i s 30 •~ ~ of ., ~ `~ r'\ ~~ i ~~ ~ ~ 629 / i ~ ' ~, ~ ~ i ~ ~ A• 28+y ~~ r ~ / / ~ ~. o 5 \ _ of v , ~ . °' _ ~~ ~~ .• o ~ z• ~ ~ a' it \ ~ ' ~~ ° 4 ~ 2 F ~ a' 23 ~ '° ~ ` ~ ~ w v 1~ J 24 ~ • ~ \ e 'd' ' 3 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 9' v ° l 36 4c ., . i a 23 ~ 10 ~ 2.1 yt ~• M 143 Ac `!I +! ~ • oc~ 12 • ~ pJ~` Q,~' G e ~* ~ wt ~ l ~ D ' » K N 6 ~ ~~ -. /-- ROUTS 628 BNGINSI3RDVG ~aoonwgN RoAn RECONSTRUCTION (17) -~- NORTH 72 ' •o ~ . ~ ., - 1 1 N ~ ~ 9 N Y 201 T tm4 P tj~ fi t f• ~ • re Cif • 27 21 w S •CIf X0{4 •. ~ • •Ctt ~ ~•2 •t ~ Nr 622 \ ` 9 y ~ ~ ~ •~o n.a-z-1 ~ 1 N M•t ' u : ~" x/1 O3 I 6 21 6 )i •a ' • c° O OS 41O ' 0{I k 4 of 1 7. - .. ' rp {c ~ P 9 ~ ' 0 u r = •~ •a . 2 X ~ 21 ~ .•' p 9 J ~ •r•s ~ D l{24 I 3 ` ~ {•7K f r ' ~ II 12 9. »x.~, ~ ~ I / F 17 I i ~\ I `~~ -/0 •71!•2 •r ~a - - / I •. • .00' '2 r \\ ~~ / I a p ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ . 2g ~ ~ 1~ v x ~ 3 \ :. ~ SY• S ` F. MO 1710-2-~ ~ ~ ~ I -.2 s'• sOOr ` . . !~ I •r ~ ~ . • I !O rJ'/.//y 1~ F ~ I P ~ ~~ ~ 21 1 7 ~` CIO pMS-2-b_ I _ r0 r21 a, I BODTB 633 •, BENOIS SOAD BNGINBBRING INSTALL FLASHING LIGHTS i SIGNAL ARM (18) ~ (19) Q NORTH ~ , ~• ~ • \ \ ~\O ~ ~ 1 ~:, ,_ / \ /\ .. a) ~ ~ fir ~ ..~ mil` ~f~ ~~Y ~ O ~' ~\~ ~~ ~ ~~ f. ~'. • ~t ~: y 'was P/ a K L. '! ` / \ ~ / •a N ~' '~ Zt t! • ~. ~ ~ / ~'- ~ ~ to r ;.,...... • \ \ : ~,..a ' ~ ... iL 1~ ,I ~ » ~ \ a ,~ A / M.K. ~' 4 ~ i u ~ ti. Za'~ ~r. •Z~ ~~ • /333 A '~/// M L ~ :. `/\ ! ~ i ~' ~ AW 11y 7~0 BNGINBBRINC cove ~oAD DRAINAGE II~ROVII~NT (20) - '1_`.J' NORTS ~. p 3s ~ • ~ ~" ~.~`~'-s X39 \. ~~ ~ P' 9, 30 ' ~~ ~ •~ e ~ k •`~ ~ 37 •'3 i 29 1' 36 ~ zoo; sa, ~ \ I 43 .~ ~ ~ • i good ~~7k ~ 'Sr . ~ t. ti •~ ,._ M ~ t ssas __ _--y- ' ~se>' 8 27 26 s6ea ~a .25 •. .~ ~ / a ~ / / ~ i ~ h1~ ~ 46 ~~a. _ \ 6 \, Dl'f9 9 y '' 4, _ 69 •r 9a4c •~ g,Gac ~~ O II . \ S \ , Rt 6T0 ~ i. / a ~ ~ P `~ x .. \\~~ \ co ~. 13 _, `o _ 1 _-•~ ~, ~ ~ i~ ~~ • ROUTB 670 - .' ENGINE&RING ~ LOS? 1~OIINTAIN ROAD RBPLACB LOW WATBR BRIDGE iIITH SLAB SPAN BRIDGE . (21) Q NORTB ~~ ,~~•-~ // r~~ ~% ~~ ~, ~ ~ ~, 1 ~ ~ - ~o~ t ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ " f 31~K. • . ~s..ooo ~: ~ ~ a ,, ~ ~1 s ,• 13i~c(a 097Ac(C1 •+ S ~ ' • s 1 04K i _/ ;~ ,• ~~ ? ~lt* 120K 9 / ~ 1~~ 1 12K. .. ., 3 • I 1 1 2SAC ~ ~~ ~ e 9 / . 2e i3K I 3 3~Ae f `• ~ _ ~1 ' 1; to 1 {~~ ~ 13 33K ~` ~~ a ~~ ~ s~ ~ ~ ss ez auot ~ 403e K(a t 3' ~~~ - - - -~ -- - - - '^ ~, / 12 / \ { 2 OOAC / 13, ' s 3e i f \ j 11 13 S3K ~/ _ ~1 ROUTB 636 BNGIIVBBRING Gr~wB CRBBg RECONSTRIICTIOH (22) ti_. _.. _, ~.. / c~' n..o.ra. ~ ~ ~ 41:•x. f°~h - ~.. _ ~ -~~c~u~'°s__ 1 " ~~'` ,~:.~i - ~ wrcrNrTrir~ ~, ~, ~.~_.. - ~- NORTR .~. BOUTB 768 BNGINB'BR11VG OLSBP GOAD RBCONSTRUCTIOU , (23) 'i ~ r' NORTH ~~ 1G~' ~~0~ . \II~._ 62\ 1~ . Fyo^ o o~ °~ c .s.4 o •'~ ~ sel o_ ~ -- - - - - - , -- - - ~~ a o`' t - -- 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ o ` ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 20 ° 'J~ ,, O~ O o ® e e l~ •e.9 o•. ~e ~ ie~e, op ~_ °~ ', ~~ o~~ ~ / X8]2` 4` ~~ et ail' - -• ~ ° `~~- ti ." -° 1597` N36 ~i6s~, ~ o 0 4 0° ~~~ 2Z ~ ~ .• 1444 A N39 11 la ~3~ Oil i~ 9 ti ~82a ~ ~e ~ 1 e ~'~ d o ~ o ~s ~ 'i ' 0 0 ie31 a `'~ ~~~ '~ oO\y~/' ~ t'9 ~ ~ 1 i~>' ~ h~ / ,i G ~.~.. o, v / \~ c~~ ~-' .~ ~~~e '•..- ~' . T. ,~ 0 1 V ;e i xOUTB 628 BNGINBBRIIVG Woon~vaN eonu RECONSTBIICTION (241) . . "'~_ NORTH ~^ ,,.,- i I I v~ n, 92 o~ "~ ,• ° o K I o p,A ~ ate./ ~01 Gp'y ~ 03„ ` ~ ~81Q pit O,i _ ~' 18)s 7J _ i ~ ~~ \ g ~ i8-6 ~ 835: :e3~ _, 0 18i~~ o~ X91 ~ dB~Q ~8~6 ~ _ ~° U8~ `ens i ~ ~96- ~ I i 8-6 186,2 ~ 4 -~_~ _ - - 188Sf-11861 - ~ 189 ~ o• o ~ ,y 1 ~ ° 988 I, 0 4 -9~3 p'o i ~ ~ ~ 189 ~ 19;3. : ~ d' ~ 19 ~ 3,' ~ ~ c -- t ~r ~• ~ 192 4 '~~ S ~, :~ ~ - 6 ~ ° 19oz o i ~esa ~ ' G! o ~ 197 c V ~ d~ ~ 09 ` ~ • .e c z~ le ~ or ° o 0 o z~ \~ o ~ ::. n r Gc~ 91 r s Y g~°` .s o ~ o r~ 192 ° o O a ~ _ i ~ + 187 i o ~ a~ Y ~ 8 i8<'9 ~8S3~iee ~81r ^ \ 60 62S t - ;~ 'S47 ,~J ~~ -' Jy .. 713 - ''~ .- ~ .. : its ~% ~ t ~ 6~E 7~ ROUTE 601 SNGIlVBBRING oLn aotl.I~rs aoen BECONSTRUCTIOH (25) -~- . NORTH ~~ 53•• ~ „.. N.. 47 J ~B 42 ~ • r • ~ ~ 41 i eu w h ~ ~ ~ t ` we, 13 ~ ~ •61 'f 49 ~ a ~• ,r ws, ~ • . ,P s7' ?° rr ~ ~ 13 , r, .~„~ few. .a ..u .,,. t ss Se ~ sl ~ 83 - ~' .. r ~ t ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ '~ ~~' ~ ~~ Cr~pMl) 1 ~ asn a Kti ~ ~ ° s° 1 ~ ny 1 ~ 26 _ 27 8 °' 24 ' I ~ ~L •21 ~ ~O , ~ ~ / ~ s . ~ _ ~ /~ x • 18 ~ • ~ ~ ` M M ~` p 29 Q ~•~~ / i A- 1 • x, a / pr 1 O r " t,~ n ~ / / ~ ~. ,~ ~ 1 r r, 31 a r' ' I ~ ~ ~ O ~ Qt• rti n ~ r' 1 ~ ~v ~ 28 + n ~ 32 3 n sue "i' / ~ v 27 y,-• 36 ~ .s r"!• KJtk~ood' ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' A 7 '' ~ m n: ys 33 ~ , 8 os ~ A 6 / ,e ~ ., ~ I / r .. ~ 16 ~• 3 12 4 , et / ~ ~ ~ " ~ ~ 25 / P • Z ~ i ~ 7 37 ~ ~ 3 . . ' ~'; ~ rP , O , 8 / j! O ~ e~ p ~. . ,, ~ 9 15. r _ q t ~ y. s; ~ ~ „ ~II / • ~ H . ~ / ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~~ ' ~~ ~ $~ ROUTB 1658 CRBSTHILL DRIVB BNGINBBRING AppROACBBS TO BRIDGB ~ BRIDGS OVER MUDLICR CRBB[. (26) ~ (27) Q NORTB ~..~.. /// .17,1K~[ _ --~~.- --- -- - ~o N Q ~ 3 ~A I C IC ' ~ 2SAc(0 \ 231k (C ~ °ti 4 r / 3. /12 ' / r x/141 ~`• / I~ X142 ~~ =~ O n.lz Acwl 6.9T AcIG ~ • 14.3 1 i83Ac ~ ,~ I 1 IS v '63SAc IT 30 00 Ac lDl 33 73 Ac ICl r> 16 2 404. ~ /\ __-_ i 2 83SAc i.1 "~f . ~'. _ Y~_ J ROIITE 61 S ~ - - - - STARLIGHT LAMB BNGINBSRING APPROACHES TO BRIDGE ~ BRIDGE OVER BACK CRBER (28) ~ (29) _L '~' NORTS 80DT8 613 BNGINBB'RING ~~~ 80°~ RECONSTRIICTIOH (30) Q NORTB BNGINBSRING RODTE 668 YELLOW 1~i0UNTAIN ROAD RECONSTRIICTIOH , (31) -~- NORTS 1 96 Ac ~ pQ/ 9 ( . ~Qt~ ZI ~•, IM 10 . •°, ~ ` ~i~Y , •,• . . 2 ' .=1`n Ovb / ms`s u n . 12 '~ ! ° .c, ~' ,. ~• ~ ~ ~ . Q 17, 1 J 1 e. 9I / ~ 14 ^ S.2 4 / . ~ ~ O' t ~ _ 13 "o ~ / r y . ", r ~ t ~ ' ; ~~ fib. ~n p ~ c i ~ ~ ,,4 e a .e~ 37, , \ 6 . ~1 ~ 2 ~ ~ ~\~~ / g ' 1„ S Cauflr dOm.M e R ~ ., ,aces 4 O ,JroJ~vd (,/111 2 aoAc (DI 3 7B Ac lG 39 ~ ~ '~ ~ ~i ! ` / aCBS ~ ~ / et ws ~ '~ •P x ` I y ,e so .. !• _ , sn „ 10 ~ ` ' '41 OVC~e ~' 17 / a ,c 'r 6 ` ,c, s "' 6 ~ 7 12 „ ~ r I I / ~ DSO ` ~' • ' ~ t,' ti 6 ~ cu V ' ~ I2 ~ so OIIAY -0 ~ • ~ ,, N S , ~ ~ • it • ik ~ ° t ~ , r, 'I 49 !f2 ~ ,' ' t, rb t, ,~ ~, } ~ 4 ., 3 2 I " 1b 14 4• ~, '8 s ~ / ~ • ~ ` `° 13 \ t ~ ~ 4 t, r. ~, , .? 16 ~ x ~o 47 O ~~ no, nos » • .° / 17 'x' e - „ ~'L +qs. = µ' ~~ .~ : ' ,or we w ~s: SS ~ ~ N t ' _ J 'o usn r `/ 4 ~ `~ S8 .• t ~ ~ ° ~ ~/• 1N ~s ' J,1 ~ _ • o t b, ,3' 61 ~ f~ ^, E' 1•+t< „~- ~ ,• 11s» 4S d~•Y ~ s " 16 ' /t ~~ 18 ~ ;;, ~ "4, 62 ~ "~ a•' k~, ~1~ ' ~'• ~ ~ ~, ~ ' s o ~ s° ,,. s a - n 6O ~' ! = - 19 • ` 6p '~ S 49 5 o n, 1; 44~ ~ • :. a.4 , 5 ~ 'o to 8 O ~ o ~ • ~ 1 ~ i~ ~ , , ~ 4 61 ~ ` ab wd w ` b 4 / ~ ' 4T J=~ ~' ` / ~ ~ ROUTB 1602 $NGI1V$B'RING BIIN[~R HILL DRIVE RBCOpSTRIICTION (32) - -- -f .+' ` ., ~ ~, ~F~ . 30 1.31 k • ~ 29 ~ It.ftA~ O 26.1 ~ ~ ~ 23 ~ ~{ 10DO/1c ~ . w .~ ~ s.. war e~c ~ :.ock r ~, _ ~.~ h • 1 P/0 2~CC1-1-2 r • 200' ~ l i y~ h 80DTS 605 ~ 1 BNGINBBRING SANDBRSON DBIVB' RBCOWSTBIICTIOH (33) Q . NORTS ~. BOUTS 623 ~1G~88RN~s FLORIST ROAD RBCONSTRUCTION (34) 'L1' NORTS ~^ II~ ARt X19 ~ ..*' ' w 11 ~ ' ~ H, It r .~ 4 ~ w 4 • M ~ ~ • iN ~ ~ M x !' as „ , a' D __ s toe.. ~~ ~ r ~ ~, ~M N~ • ~ ~ u ~ s ,• ~~ 3 ~ O «, • / cw~wi 3 / 7 I ~ / f • ~ , s a 'A I i , r • ! ~ • ~ OI ~ ~ I / ~~ .... ~ ~ ,.. t,. no aas-i_: / r. od .o __ __ _~_ ___ u ~ / i~ O ' --- --- ------~ - -°_~-- _.~___~.~_ SfO \ Z! +t , +'~ M K ~ ~ Hwy 4 • ~ „ ~ ~ ` ~ w~•~ ' _{ ~ ~ tt ~ ~ ~ w .,i ~ ~ • ~ ~~ a ` ... ~ • ~~ a ~ 20 ~ Irnr [~rri~ ~` \, ~ \ ` ~ ~ ~ „ ~ ~~ ~~ ` « / \ ~ ,~ ~s~.. \ \ ,. ~ l2 \• ~ ~ ~. \ ~• ll ~ ~ M ,.n c arr. ao tzr_}~ i., ~. ..,. ~.... t.,., ~.~ ~r _ ^ n 7,tM ,'MO/EIIrr OEMift BNGINBBRIIVG ROUTE 720 coLONrer. ev$rros caRV$ n~ROV~rrr (35) r, ;' .. ~ $ ~ o `r N ~ v v O • S O~ Iy/rf Or V ~ V vWi z .-/ c~ ~ d d ~ N N !+1 O e H ~„~ O~ N ~t d0 N r+ O a ~ p. O N ~ ^ M ~t ~ ~T ~1 • a1 N .+ ~ N N N N ~ N N ~ .~ ~ a0 v+ O O .+ CO N ~ ~ i '' ~o N o~ O O v i O~ .t .t ? ~ .. e0 ~ N V1 O ~ ~ r+ ~+1 ~D N 1~ O O~ J O N 0 ~ O O GD O e ~1 ~ ~ ~ ~ °D k! W ao a ~ ~ . + n i ~ w v o~ a~ o~ ao ~ T ~ r. r. r. .. .~ ao tai N h 8 ~ r . .+ ~e, .n M ~ ~ o0I ~' O~ I O~ ( ~ ) o~ l I ~ O~ O~ C~ O~ O~ O~ O~ ~ a~DI ~~ al ~~ ~~ ) O+ O~ O~ O~ p- O~ O~ ~-i ~-i ~-1 ~-1 .-~ .-1 .-1 J a d o~. • D v ~~ 0 a° w O i.+ C 0 v OG vii \ rr k 41 o. N\ W O N ~~~ v eG H t~•" N u u ti0 9• i V ; I C-1 s~~ ~~ ~s H ~ Q W H _ N ~ Q V m S ¢~ ti G W~_ N E w w w w r w r w• w w w w w• w• w w w• w• w w w• w r ••••• w w w• r ~ ~ g g g g ~ i i i E oooo : ~ ' ~ ~ ,_ - ------- --- --- - s .~-- -- -- ; 1 --- --- - g ; g ; g ; g ' O 1 O ~ O ; O / , , 1 1 , - ss g s ; --gg-- -; --gg- i ~~ ~~ ~s~ mm ss i ss ss s s ~ s S ' M 1 1 ~lp~ ~Fp O O 1 1 i ~ p~ p 1 S B O O O O O O i 1 pm ~ ~ ~ ~ 1/') m m O t 1 w w 1 ; / ; 1 1 = • . t ~ O S ~ ~ ~ p p O O ~ ~ 1 ~ p~ p~ ~ ~ O O ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ G~ p~ O 1 • ~ fi ~ p ~ p - O O I 8 S ~ p O ppO pp 1 ~~ p ; i ~m I ~ i oO oO V! Y7 ~ i O m~ ~ 1 O O t `01 ~ 1 OI ..I w 1 1 1 I 1 1 ~ ~ V O ; ~ ~ O O ~ ~ ~ p p~ ~ O S ~ ~ ; ~ ~ p~ p~ ~ ~ O S 1 ~ ; ~ ~ p~ p~ ~ O S 1 ~ ~ ; Q D 1 ~Fp Fp O O I pp p ; 1 O O ; 1 pQ pO 1 H OI 1 ; O O_ O O 1 W ~ p p 1/7 9 I m m I Q V W I `I ~ 1 ~ ~ 11 I 1 1 ! ~ ^ I 1 I 1 1 ; 1 1 N i O O I p O O i p S O 1 p O O j W ~ 1 1 1 1 I ~ ~ O O 1 O O 1 O O I O O 1 • m 1 p~'1 pml 1 O O Y9 V'I 1 1 _ _ m m 1 j _ Q V 1 1 . 01 1 1 1 I 1 ~ _ - - - 1 ~ - _ I ~ ~ 1 1 1 ~ p S O ~ pp O 1 1 _ _ O O _ ; _ - 1 - - O I CO O 1 • OI 1 lF0 ~ 1 p p O O i lF0 tF0 1 O p O 1 • m ~ O O ~ O O t O O 1 O S 1 1 F F ~ N N 1 _ V Q m m ~ _ O O 1 1 1 . -I -. 1 ~ ~ v v 1 ~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - J i 1 o 0 0 0 O O O O X 0 0 0 0 O O O O 1 1 0 0 0 0 O O O O I 0 0 0 0 O O O O _ = W ; O O NO NO ; O O O O 1 O O O O i O O O O j O Q DC ; < Q 1 1 1 W I 1 1 i 1 O W ' 1 ~ ti ~ Q d 1 .-I w 1 1 1 I 1 1 ~ 1 1 1 I 1 j ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O i ~ ~ 00 ~ _ ; _ _ O _ _ O - ; _ _ _ O _ O _ 1 N !D C= ; O 1 O 1 O i O 1 1 I ~ 1 1 ~ ~ j ~ 1 d W 1 I 1 1 1 / 1 I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ pp pp 0 0 p 8 ~ ~ ~ ~ po~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ pp~ ~ ~ ~ ; j ~ 1 O O ~ 1 O ; 1 O O 1 1 O O 1 1 Q _ j I I 1 1 F7 M I j I ~ ~ 1 ~~ 1 / 1 1 1 1 ~ ~ ; 1 1 1 D W j ~ 1 ~ 1 1 1 1 1 ~ 1 1 ¢ 1 1 1 ~ ¢ 1 O V W 3 2 1 - C ~ W~ 2 ~- i W Z 2 I- i W 2 F - j W 1 d OG V V 1 6. OC V ~ ; d OC V ~ ; d ~ ~ ~ j - _ . ~ _ 1 _ _ I i ~ ; 1 1 I j ~ 1 1 N Z W 1 ~ 1 V/ 1 1 C 1 1 p ; ; a.J ~ O 1 1 H Q OG 1 ti S 1 _ S 1 ~ 1 ,~ ~ 1 ~' t0 i ~ 1 ~ 1 _ O t _ Q W I 1 d' Z 1 H j 1 v ~ 1 O ¢ 1 i V{ f~ W J 1 Z F - ~ 1 ~ I V ~ ~ 1 ~ 1 1 _ ~ K 1 1 1 H 1 _ ~ I 1 1 ~ ~ d ~ Q 1 . ~ 1 .. / 1 1 1 ; ~ ; . . 1 1 1 j 1 IW~ 1 1 j j 1 i 1 i I i ~ i ~ 1 1 i 1 1 I / 1 I i ~ ~ 1 i ./ • w w 1 r I 1 1 I 1 • w w r w u s w w w w• w r w w r r w+ w w w w w~ • II w w• w•~ C~2 ~= ~ o ~ ~_ ~ ~ H ti V ~ O {I//11 OC O Z ~ DC VOOOV N =• w w w w r w w w w w w• w w w w w w w w u w w w• s w w w• w• w w r r w w i ~ ~ g g g g ~ g S g g i = S 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o s O ~ ~ a ! ~ w ~ 1 / 1 g w e i . 1 o o i p' w i 1 t / i / 1 1 1 1 - .. .. 1 - - - - = - - ~ a ~~ ~~ 9 ~~ :~ w ~~ 1 « m~ s w ~ ~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 p ~ 8 8 ; 1 p 8 8 , p p ; O O , - - - p i 8 - - - ~ ~~ 1 $~ ~~ ! N ~ pp 1 N N j V f 1 y S ~ ~ ~ ~I i j ~ / 1 1 1 1 1 1 ~~~~ 1 ~ ~ O 8 1 O 8 1 SO 8 O I w ~ w 1 8 8 1 O O 1 1 pq 8 G O Qp 1 G v ; 1 O 1 i 2 ~~ 1 N N 1 1 V~ i m m I I 1 ~ O ; I ; .... .r ; 1 iwi Q 1 w S ! J i O O i O o i O o i O ; 1 i Q . D 1 Q 1 8 0 1 1 O~ 1 O O O I O 1 1 ~ H ~ 01 1 O j C 1 O O i i ~¢ W ppl~ 1 N N ~ ~ ~~ 1 O O m m i ~ ~> O pl j 1 ~ I 1 i Q' d 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ; 1 1 _ ~ ~ O O 1 O 1 0 0 1 p - LL ~ ~ O O i pp p 0 O O 1 O O 1 O 1 i = m 1 N N I I ~' O O 1 m 1 I 1 • ~ .~.. I 1 m 1 I I 1 1 ~ 1 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 1 w s r j O $ I 1 1 O O O O ~ O O O O O O O O i O O O O 1 O O O O ~ j 1 ~ m 1 ~ 0 0 1 p O 1 O O ~ ~ ~ O O O pp j w N N 1 1 ~ ~ t t ... i . 1 ~ ; e .ti N N O O_ O O I O .... lY"1` m 1 t ! ~ 1 1 I w w J i O O O O i O O S O O 1 O o O O O O O O I O O - S - - i w Q C w ~ I 1 O O O O ; O O O O 1 O ') 'f ~ O O O 1 1 = w O I 1 I 1/ Y I GQ~ ~ i 1 O O O O O 1 ~ H B O 1 1 O O . i ~ I ~ ~ O 1 S O O 1 1 ~ C W T i 1 j 1 1 ~ .... Q QI 1 O O 1 t .r u7 O i !~ m j 1 ! ¢ j I 1 1 .~ ti j 1 1 w _ / 1 ~ / I = 1 O 1 1 1 O 1 O 1 1 = O 0 j O ~ O i O 1 C I w ~ 1 I I 1 ~ ~ w W 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I w / 1 I 1 1 I I I 1 i _ ~ _ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ I 1 p p p p p~ p~ p p I O 1 O ~~ = ~ 1 O_ O I O O O O j p~ Qplf e .ti O O 1 ~^~ S 1 ~ ~ j ~ 1 .+ .-I ~ ~ ~ W 1 / 1 _ j 1 1 ~ I I ~ O 1 W 7 0 ~,/~ J ~ 1 ~ S V1 i N~ ~ • ~ V ~ E/'f 0 1 4 OC U F- i W~ z G I d OC V~ _ 1 W OZ O ' ~ W~ p p I 1 W W 1 I ; d d V I- ; d~ V F~ 1 ~ ^ ; 1 r 1 ; 1 ~ 1 1 1 i N ~ ; 1 ~ ~ I ~ 1 2 I / O 2 j 1 2 O ~ ~ 1 -~ 1 1 1 ~ F- Z ~ ~~ 1 J~ 1 ~ W 1 ~ I 1 O H~ ~ r j ~ 1 2 V ~ OC ... i ~ Vf = 1 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ _ ~ (pp 1 ~ W ~ 1 D d' 1 w O ~ i y W/ ~ Q 1 Q Z 1 ~ {/~ 1 Z Z 1 = 1 ~ t W 1 I I F- 1 O 1 V i S 1- O ~ ~~ 1 I ^ 1 / W W 1 y1 2 0 i 1 ~ 1 1 ~ M O 1 ~ ... ~ I i Oc O W~ ~ 1 1 1 ~ ` ; ; ; ~ W / 1 / / ~ ~ H 1 ~ S 1 1 1 ~ ~~ 1 ~ K • ~ ~ 1 p~ ~ W O~ ~ N `~ 1 ¢ 1 1 / 1 1 I 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ; 1 ~ I 1 w w w w w M 1 M w • % j ~ N 1 w w w• • • M • • • w w w w w • w M • • • w q w w w w w w 11 C-3 ~~ v ~ t ~~ r ~= WN~y N OL O 1- O T F O^ V ~ O W F~ _ H O T r ~~ W~ l/'! w• w w w w •• •• w• w r w w w w •- w •• w r w• w w w w w• w• w w• w w w w• g g g g } g g g g i g g g g i g g g g i W = o 0 0 0 / o e o o ~ o 0 0 o i o o 0 0 ' o w = 1 _ 1 / _ 1 1 ----- - ------ -s------ 1 -'----- ~ --=------ I ~ = o # s ~ s i g _ = ~ ~ o o a / 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 » / ~ 1 ~ 1 ~ 1 r ~ a I O 1 1 O i O j O 1 1 ^ I 1 1 I 1 1 ~ : ~ j ~ 1 I ' ~ ~ ^ j 1 / 1 1 j 1 1 » ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ^ j ~ ~ ~ o 1 O p I 8 ~ M :~ 1 O 1 O ~ O j O 1 1 f 1 1 1 1 : N ~ •~ 1 j 1 1 1 1 1 j 1 1 • 1 1 j I 1 1 ~ p ~ O i 8 1 1 8 t S i ~ : N 1 O j O 1 ~ O 1 O 1 • ~ ~~ 1 1 1 j ' 1 1 I • 1 / i j ~ 1 O 1 O j 1 ~ j~ W ~ O 1 1 O j O 1 O i 1 I ~ 1 ~ y , 1 t ~ I 1 1 p ~ / d' 1 ~ 1 I 1 1 d 1 1 1 i W 1 G ~ O 1 O ~ O 1 I O~ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 j QI f 1 1 I 1 1 1 I ' 1 1 ~ 1 O O 1 1 O O 1 ~ O O O O ; ~_ p~ 1 O 8 i 1 1 o+ j O O ~ Ir1 Y'1 i i i f f tD ^ 1 aG ~ 1 ~ 1 R e 1 1 1 ~ n~ ~ 1 1 .F.~ ~ 1 1 ~ 1 JJ . . ~ Q QQ Q 1 ~ v v~ i ~ ~ ~ pp~ pp~ ~ ~ 1 0 0 0 0 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ pp~ 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 Q 1.~ C OC O O O ~ O+ N ~ N 1 O O 1/Y Y9 1 1/'f 117 ' 1 1 O O 1 C~ !~ i O O IC ap I M I'^f 1 ' D 2~ 1 1 ) {A II I 1 M M 1 V7 Y7 1 1 ' ~ O W 1 4O ~ O O I V O 1 I ~ C'~ ~ ~ ~ ' p p~ Q 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 , ' 1 1 ' . _ 1 I 1 _ ~ _ _ . ~ S 1 1 p ~ O 1 O j O 1 O 1 ~ 2 I 1 i I i ~ ~ 1 1 I 1 I 1 j 1 1 1 1 / 1 1 1 ~ ~ ~ p p I O O 1 1 ; ~ p~ p~ ~ ~ I O S 1 1 ~ ; ~ ~ pp~ ~ ~ ~ 1 O O I ~ ~ ~ ~ pp~ p~ % O S 1 / j ~ ~ Y"l U7 1 1 I 1 ' 1D N / ; 1 O O 1 e R 1 ; M M 1 / l_ ~ 1 / tff Y7 / ' ti ff ~ 1 1 1 1 1 1 / 1 1 1 1 1 1 ~ 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 H Q j / 1 H 1 1 ~ ~ 1 N y yZ W S ~ W~~ H J W ~~ 2 ~ O O 1 1 d K V H O 1 d R' V /-~ 1 ~ 0 0 d •- 1 W 3 1 1 Iy . ~ I I K V F~ 1 1 d K V~ ~ i ~ _ 1 ~ 1 1 1 j I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ~ 1 I 1 1 1- S 1 J 1 . 1 i 1 d~ 7 1 = 1 1 = 1 _ 1 = I ~ / = 1 I . W J / O N w mm m ; N N~ ; O~ m~ ~ 1~'1 0~ ~ j I N w P a0 N X 1 1 = 1 M .~+ p~ ~ 1 w~ O y 1 ~ ~ V'• w ..N.1 / 1 ~ OC OC F.. ~ ~ ~ 1 Q2 ; 1 OC OC 1- F~ ~ 1 OI ~ M K pC 1- ~ / { a 1 ~ p~ p1 ~ _ 1 ~ 1 .. . 4' O J~ 1 ~ W 0 J~ ZZ ~ O~ J d i ~ 2 Q ~ .~+ Iii ~ W~ 1 1 ~ 1 _ 1 D - . - j . . 1 1 1 1 ~ 1 K 1 1 1 j C H 1 j ~ ~ ~ O~ 1 1 ~ OC f1O 1 W D •- _ 1 O ~ ~ ~ O H ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 1 1 OOOGG 10 ~ 1 1 ~ ~ ~~ 8 I ~ ~ V _ ~ 1~ ~O 2 v K ~- 1 OC ~- ..Or 1 W ' ' j 10 / y V 1 ~O I Y V I O~ J W 1 S N O 1 1 M J y ~. ~ j 1 uG6! ~ 1 1 1 1 1- { y j ~ J pl y ~ n --/ V ~ ~~ V 1 w w w r r r 1 r w w r r r r r ~ S V -~ r r•• w r r r 1 w S ••• it • r s .. « ,• ~ •~ r r r•• w r r r j r C-4 .~.. • ~•~ ~c~ 0 -~- 0 0~1 F-~ w V ~ J ]W~ ~ _ 2 ~ O V ¢~ ~ C V N M r w w w w w w w r r• w w w w w w w w w w w w r w w • w r w w w p ~ S O S H p p p O S O O p p S S S S w p w w w w u w ,w, W ; 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O Z o 0 0 o ~ S S O S S o 0 0 0 1 ~ ~ 1 1 i / 1 ~ 1• 1 Y _ ~ M w 1 8 ~ 8 8 8 1 1• Iw• ~ O i O 1 1 O ~ O 1 1 U 1 w w = ' ~ 1 i i ~ ' i i » A . . .. ~ C_ _ _ ~ 8 _ ~ _ _ _ ~ _ ~ i $ ~ 1 _ _ _ _ ; O _ ~ 1 - i » 1 O • i : T ' i O 1 1 O i i O I I O 1 i i ~ I• i r 1`~' ~' 1 1 1 ~ 1 1 I 1 1 ' 1 1 ~ I / / ' 1 r 1 i 1 • • • ~ ~ 8 i S 1 1 ; ~ ; O _ O _ _ i ~ . M 1 O ~ O 1 O i O 1 t • /y pp~~ . OI 1 1 t 1 j 1 1 1 1 1 1 • 1 1 / ~ 1 • ~ 1 1 1 1 • ~ ~ 1 1 • j S 1 S 1 O S I ~ ~ 1 O i O j O / 1 O 1 1 1 1 / ~ T 1 1 ~ 1 I 1 1 H . j . ~ .. ~ ~ ~ 1 1 ~ ' 1 1 1 / ~ 1 _ 1 . 1 ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ . ~ J ~ S 1 i S ~ O ; 1 S 1 ' Q . p 1 O j O I O I O 1 / . H _ . 01 I ~ I ~ I 1 Of I W W O 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I : ` > ~ i 1 I ~ 1 I I 1 1 d I J ~ j ~ ~~~ ' 1 I 1 ; ~ I 1 1 I _ - i S ; C ; O ; C ~ _ _ 1 W :~ 1 ~ O 1 O ~ O 1 I O 1 1 1 ~ 1 1 1 ~ 1 i ~ 1 1 1 ~ 1 I 1 / I 1 I I 1 I I 1 S O i S O 1 ~ O O O O p p ' : m i ~~ ~ l'N N ~ 1 1 n~ I 1 1 ~~ 1 O O i w f 1 1 1 m t ~ I ^ M M 1 1 I.p Ip 1 . . 1 N N 1 : T ~ 1 I .M-, M-I I ~ t V 1 1 ~~ ; 1 1 1 J p~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ; S O S S ~ ~ p i O O S O - - ~ - 1 O O O S - - - - - - - - - _ I O O O O 1 - ' 1 /~ O 0 ~ I 0 0~~ j ; O O PI O~ 1~ ~ 1 O O -1 w 1 1 O O V~ j ~ O 1 ~ M M 1 {O aC j N N ~ G ~ W i ~ ~ ~ wM..I ~ f f ~ p.1 /"9 ~ C GL Q 1 I 1 1 / 1 I / ' 1 I I I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 N {O ~ ~ 1 O 1 S 1 1 ~ OO I ; _ p~ ~ _ S 1 -_ ~ i O O O ~ 1 .... D J~ I 1 / 1 1 1 ~ O 1 1 1 ~- 1 I I I 1 1 ~ 1 1 1 S O I S S 1 S S 1 S ~ 1 }pl (p~1 1 w w O ; ~ t 1 / O~ 01 / 17 Af / ; ao t0 I N N 1 / w ti ' 1 ~ ~ 1 '- ~ 1 1 M 17 / 1 1 1 1 ' 1 1 1 1 I j 1 ' j 1 ~ W j I ~ j _ ~ 1 1- ~~ 1 1/1 1 W x O 1 ~ N O 1 I .,,~ 1 1 W ~ 1 d Q VGOOO H ; W 7 dam I W' 0 0 ; W Z 1/7 ~ ~ ' -- -- ~ --~---- .- -= ~ aocv~- ~ doc v° i ~ 1 1 1 1 1 - ' ~ 1 1 i 1 x N _ 1 W 1 = 1 =' OC Z W J 1 1 ~~~ I _ p1 p~ 1 Of . N 1 Vf N~ p~ ~ ~ p 1 j ti ~ ~ N O X 1 O L ~ ~C~ w ~O X 1 O w = 1~r lO+O ` i ~ T 1 .a0i .~.Ip= 1 ~ i 1 O~[ O h=-~ F - VV77 K ~ = ///77f SSf = ~ ; ~ ; o O --~ I ~ ~ ~ /- 1 ; K OC -_•- -- j , ., / 1 ~ ~ ~O O. 1 ti W O ~ ~ 1 b ~ O ~ ~ i ~ ~ H ~ ~ 1 1 j / j W ~. 1 p~ 1 Oo-- 1 1 I ~~ 1 I 1 i or 1 p~ ~ Q .~ ' i o~ p~ {,~ A ~ Q .~ 1 1 ~ 1 1 _~ y ~~ I OC ~ 2 v OCC 1 J O z p1 W ; v G ~ V -_ ; a0 = V 1 1/9 V ~ I S N U j • w• w w w 1 • w w w w w• r 1 w iO !~ 1• 1 w H i 1 ~~ •. 1 ; • • r• r w w w t • w• w w w w w • w • • w w w w C-5 `v~ 1~y N ~[ O ~ ~ ~ V 2~ ^ V N ~ w w• w w w•• w• Iu w••• w w• w•• w w w w• r r w w••• r w w w ~- w 8 8 8 8 = g g g g ~ g g g g g g g g ! O o O o 1 O o o O o o O o ~ O o O o S ` 1 ~O 1 1 1 / 1 1 ; / 1 1 1 i / 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 = ....... _ ..... _ _ _ 1 1 / / . . 1 / O 1 / / 1 ~ O 1 0 1 1 1 / 1 1 1 1 / 1 1 p O 1 1 / 1 1 1 I ~ 1 1 ~ ~ 1 1 ~ 1 :a / 1 1 O 1 O 1 1 1 O ~ O 1 1 i :M 1 °; 1 ; ' 1 . / - - - - - - - 1 's s• - - .- - - - - s 1 - - - i - - - - - - s . - - - - - - - i s ~ - - - '~ i a ; e o / :~ ' ~ 1 i 9 - - ----- s - - -- s i 1 s s ' ~ i o ~ I , ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ' i :_ _- V _ - ----- -- ---- -- - _~ ---- -------- -- J 1 1 ~ g ; j ~ 1 p O 1 p ; O 1 I Q . D W I O 1 1 C 1 ~ O 1 O I 1 • V p1 1 1 1 i i W OI 1 1 1 1 ~ Y ~~ ~ i i 1 1 ~ I j I d = ~ I ~ I 1 O 1 p ~ O 1 O 1 1 L~ i O O ~ O .00'1 1 1 ~ O 1 i 1 1 p ~ O 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 ; 1 1 j 1 1 1 I 1 1 I I ; 1 ~ G G 1 1 O O ~ O O 1 1 O O I O i O 1 i '~ ~1 1 ~~ ~ /"! I'7 p i O p O ~ O 0 1 1 0 1 O i i 1 1 m 1 m m ~ ~ 1 O O ~ 1/Y 1/'1 1 ~ 1 ~ 1 1 1 I . ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ 1 0 0 0 0 ~ .~ p~ ~ ~ 1 p 0 0 0 ~ ~ 1 ~ p~ p~ ~ ~ ~ O O O O ~ ~ p~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ 2 2 W 1 O O e f I O O 1 1 O O O O I O O O O O O O O I O d' O / M M 1 O O 1 ; ~ ~~ O 1 m Oi I 1 p 0 Y7 ~ ; 1 O W K Q 1 1 1 ~ j ~ I ; 1 ~ ; 1 / ~ ; I . Z ~ ~ 1 0 O 1 1 O 1 8 ; i 0O O O i q 1 1 O 1 O pp 8 1 ~ ~ O O O I d W 1 ~ 1 1 1 j / N O Al ~ 1 I p p ~ O O .~ ~ ~ I O O 1 ~ ~ 1 1 ~ ~ ~ p~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ p~ ~ p~ i 0 O O ~ I M M i O O 1 O 18 8 i O S O j _ 1 m 0! o ~ 0 Y09 ~ 1 1 1 i N O fN j ~ W H 1 1 j 1 t ~ 1 i 1 1 I ~ 1 I ~ 1 ~ 1 t~1f J 1 {~/f J 1 N Q ~ H Q -~ V 1 W~ 2 H 1 \ 0 0 1 W 7 2 h- I ~ V~ 1 W Z Y-- / W~ 2 -- I d 1 d~ V O 1 \ 0 0 1 1 1 1 I 1'7 ~ 1 ~ .-~ 1 1 ~ 1 = ; I 1 ~ O 1 r- H. 1 J 1 I ~ ~ / d 1=- ~~ 1 W 3= I i ~ 1 p~ 1 K p 1 m I 1 I L ~ " ~ 1 L 7 W 1 0 1 ~ W J I w = = 1 °, W m 1 Oe i N ~ 1_ V WQ ; O p O• ~ ~1 1 O O = ~ [[ ~ 1 ~,y b w p i j 1 1 / N = i!r 2 ~ff = ~~ 1 ~ ~ 0 0 h=- ~- N i ' Ol r ~ I _ O x$ 0 1 .. .. ~ ~ i ~ .. .. ~ 1 i N OC ac 1 . ~ .... 1 ti V O J~ ~ O W H J 1 ~1pp ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ... .. _ _ _ _ _ _ O H C -{Q~~ 1 ~ ~ R' .~ ~ O {F. I ~ ~ Q I j 1 O h- / O ~ ~ 1 OG t 1 1 ~ .J.I ~- w = O~ ~~ 1 O' OL i D !- w ~ ~~~ ~I i H V 1 1 ~ N -Z- i 'iV/f O Q I i ~ t" VN1 V T ~ /1 i ~ V j / 1 V 1~ i N = r 1 1 w W 1-- ¢ 1 O W -- ~ pp ¢ V a~ 8 ~ O Q ~ • • w w M M M•• • M M • • • M 1/ M ••• • w w w A Y • • • I -- 2 ~ f f • • f Y w ~ C-6' .o =• w w 1+ w w u r w w w w w w• w w w w w w w w w w r w w w r w• w• w i g g g g i g g g g i g g g g • w i g g g g w• i 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 i e o o e I 1 i I / ~' ~ i 1 1 I 1 1 i ~ g ~ g i g / g 1 IIyy~~ O ~ o i o ~ i v WWOO w 1 i ~IIny t~if OC O « I.11 ~ 1 = ~ i 1 ' ~ I 1 ~ -. g c = 1 1 ~ : o~ ~ 1 , 1 o 1 i o ; ~ e I i ' w : ~ w • ~ I 1 ~ ~ I i 1 1 ~ 1 / ~ ~ I w : ~ S i o ~ g i c i g ~ c i g ~ o ~ i M ~ • : ~ ~ / 1 / ~ ~ i 1 1 1 1 1 i i • 1 8 ~ ~+ 1 O i - ~ - ; • N 4 1 O / O 1 1 O ~ I O / i ~ • ~ I ; j I 1 ; T ~ ; ~ ~ VQ - M O - - - ~ - p- ~ 1 O ~ - - ~ - - p~ - I O - - I - - - po- I O - - - ' ; --- S- -~ 1 - M 2C : O f 1 O ~ O 1 O ; O I ~ :~ : 01 ~~ V 1 ~ ~ I 1 1 j j I 1 I I I I 1 ~ ~ ~ p a ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ O'I ~ .~ • d w J t V 1 1 - - - - - ~ - ; - - - - - 1 1 - ~ - - - ~ - - - - - - - - - 1 I ~ V ~ O pc o z~ w_ f a< ~ o° ~ o ~ o ~ o O i o i ° O - ~ 1 $ - I i O m V~ w_ ~ 1 1 1 ~ I 1 1 ~ O I 1 1 > .-. s ~ • 1 ' I I i I 1 I I V _• w w ~ ~ 1 p - ~ ; / - ; 1 1 - ; ~ - - - - - - - - ; I I - I lI = w . m 1 M w : ~ ; O 1 p 1 1 j ; O I O i I ~ O 1 O ~ I ; ; G O ! 1 1 ; 1 i ; w w ~ - - - - 1 - - - - - - 1 - - - ~ 1 1 1 w ~ J 1 p ~ O S O O - - p- - - I S S S O - - p- - p- - - I O O O S - _ ~ i O O O O - - 1 - w ¢ _ ~ 't `~' v I O O O O 1 1 O O O O 1 I i O O O O ; i O O O O 1 1 , 1 1 w -- ° o • 3S o 1 I 1 I ' 1 I 1 I 1 i ~ o"oWC w ¢ ~ 1 I I i 1 I ~ ~ - I • 1 w - - . - - - 1 - - - - / I I - - - I i - - - I I ! 1 i I ~ t.If t0 p p ~ O o O p p p i O O O 1 p p C i O O g i --$ 8-- - • a ~ 2 ~ Ii Q g i 3 ~o~ 1 r1 N ; m m Q QQ i 25 325. I ; r7 O f 1 Q 5$~Qpp i Q 17S 0 ~ d i o 8 Ci ~ O 1 I i 1 w - - - - 1 - - - • ~ - - - I - - - - - - - - ~ ~ - - - - - - I t I ~ 1 ~ p p p ~ O O O p p p I O O 8 ; p p i $O O 8 - - - - ~ ~ - - ~ - ; I r pQ 8 S ; O O O Qp pQ 8 1 O v O pQ 8 1 Y"1 IA G Cow Qp % O O ; w ~ • ~ w m m j ~ i M r f ; 1 1~ i ~ w j ~ o o ; V t ~ i ; I _~ W H¢ M ~ y V j 1 ; W I~/f O / / _ % 1 j I ~ i 1 ~ W~~ O ~ W Z o O ; W Z O O w~ W~-- • M 1 d OC O I-- ~ V - . ~ ~ d OC V r- . 1 ~ d O[ V I- - - I ~ GC V 1--- ~ - ~ • I M W j ~ ~' pp i N 1 H I ' i N W i Q j ~ i 1 • ~ 1 ~ 1 u1 ~ ~ 1 N I~ 1 ~ ~ I F~ ~ `~ I w d • G O M K ' 1 ~ Y I ~ 1 7 L W I O W ~ p ~ 1 m I ~ I ~ = ~ 1 1 1 S { W ~ V J ; I1~1 1 N L~ 6d j ~ = "" 1 ~ . K ~ ~ ~ I pp i N~~ M ~ i A ~ ~ g 1~ ~ N j 1 O O O f ~ V _ 1 1 =~ ~ { My fi¢ i ~ O~C OL O i0 N 1 f ~ g.. O~ I ~ H O j ~~ I ~ S J 1 • • 1 ~1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Ii W ~~s ~ I ~!•p• o p_~ 1/7 OC ~ f_ = N (gyp ~ m I ~p 7. _ O 1 . ; - ~ jj i J - - ~ 1 O W OO - ' ~ J •.! N ~ _ 1 O ~ / j M w ~ o 1 1 ' s ~ Gf OC i 1 r I.W.. -- i o ((~,,I K ~ Q {¢,/ ~ ~ OC Qy 1 G ~ 1 J {~¢,I ~ 1 O OC O OC 1 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ W i W 10 v ~ C S M ~Ipp ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ P - ~p W ~ 1 1 H Z I f p 1 I I ~ O - i 7 -~ p 1 0 3 -- 2 ~ p i O -v- ~ 1 w w w w• w w w w w r w w w I w• w w w w w I w w w w w w / w w w- w w w w• w• w `'_7 ~~ _~~ ~~e F~ Y ~ O>' ~- w V ~ ~ W -_=~ _ V m VI w w w r w w w w w s w w w w w w w w r w w w w w w r w w r r w w w w w w w w• 8 8 8 8 i g g g g = g g g g ~ g g g g i ~ o o e o ~ o 0 0 0 ~ e o 0 0 ~ o 0 0 0 = 1 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ g g g 1 g ~ O ~ O / O : O 1 1 • 1 ~ = s ~ s ; - ~ - - - I o o o I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 =~ _ _ ; / ~ ; ~ 1 - - - - - - - - ~ 1 1 / g g g r., o o _ o o I / , 1 ~~ I - - - - - - - - - - ' I ; 1 / 1 = = -----------------------~ F ~ ~ ~ 8 ~ g 1 / 1 1 O ~~ ~ o o ~ o I 1 ; 1 : I 1 T ~ 1 ~ 1 1 2 ^ 1 1 1 , 1 , I V H - - ' - - - - - I ~ ~ 1 1 O 1 I Q ~ ~ G ; C 1 O ; O ~ I W 1 1 1 1 1 • W I 1 1 1 1 QOM I O 01 I ~ 1 ~ I . d 1 ; I I J _ ! = I Q I ~ 1 H ; G ; O ; ~ ; O _ ; p 1 1 O 1 1 O I '~ . 01 1 C 1 G I O 1 O I 1 1 1 1 1 I Q1 1 ; 1 ~ I I 1 1 1 I 1 1 I I I I ; 1 1 . ~ ~ ~ _ 1 1 1 o I ~ ~ I 1 O 1 $ 1 O I O I ~ C ~ ~ O 1 O I m 1 1 C 1 O O I 1 ~ j I 1 1 1 I ~ 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I • I p p ppQ p p p ~ ~ ~ 1 0 0 0 0 I O "" O O ; 8 0 O O 1 O p O p I 1 1 O 2~ ~ O O O O ~ O O O O ~ O O O O 1 O O O O ~ 1•~ ~~ 1 I 1 1 1 _ 1 ~ I 1 I I G~~ 1 j 1 j / p 1 1 1 1 1 Q 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 I .. _ ~ 1 1 1 ~ 1 1 { A t D ~ O O 1 O O I O O O O 1 O O O O ~ I Q 5s2 1 o ~ 8 S ~ ~ 25 '~ 8$ d ~ S$ o o ~~ ~~ ~ a~ ~~~~ 6~sso I 1 N fr7 1 8 O / O S ~ O O O S ~ O O O O j o g ~ ~ S 1 ' / ~~ as ;mamas iNsNs I ' 1 1 I ... , 1 I I 1 W ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 H 1 ~' 1 H J I H- J 1 11 ~ LG.. I W~~ P.. 1 W~ 2 F¢•- 1 Vf ¢ T N Q I W V 1 d OC V ~O 1 d OC V~ 1 W 3 O O i W~ C O i ~ 1 ~ ~ d OC V 1- ; O OC V F- 1 _ = 1 / _ ~ / 1 O ~ 1 I C 1 W j 1 V V j p~~ QQ O ~ d I=- 1 2~ 2=~~ i S ~ 1 h W= 1 !Q f{{{7ppp0 ~ O 1 N J ~ d ~ _ ~ ~ ~ j m 10 ~ ~ W 1 O 01 ..: ~j ~ 1 G ~ K ~ i f/~ .•.I Z1 _~ Q 1 ~~ DC Y I=- 2 Q I o -- N 2 {/> 1 ~ y W~ 2~ ~ 1 {p .. .. y m / ..~p.I .. .. ~ t01 ~ ~`~. O. ~~~,pp ~ ~ n p OL ~. 1 O 4Q. H J J~ i p O[ O W tiJ ~ 1 Z _ .. ~ ~ J OCC I ~ W ~ J K 1 ~ ~ ~ N ~ / 1 ~y 1 ~ ~ O ~ 1 Q H 1 1 {¢,,~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ OG ~ ~~~~ ~ ppppr~~ h~~ ~ o°c~~ i o°c VVVO"'111 LI~G i !~ = v 1 ; N Y t.7 ~ 1 z~ u 1 2 u ~ !~p~ _VV V ~ ~ I I I ~p Wp 1 ~ 0 2 F- ~ 1 0 2 F- 1 O~ H ~ 1 O~ ~- ~ i C-8 i i i • i • i i Y Y • • i • i i M i Y • Y • i Y i i • i i i i • i • M M • • V w N ~~ D H ~ .-. V ~ O W 1-- _ /-~ V m ~ =Y ti 2 = .. • w w w w w w r w w r r w w• w w w r r w w w r r w r• r w r r w w w r• r w ~ S S S g ~ g g g g S S S S i S S S g i O O o 0 0 0 0 0 O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 ; 1 / • 1 1 / 1 I I S }! i! 1 / 1 ~ / ; w w ; a ~ ~n 1 O ~ ~ 1 O i i / p' ~ 1 ~ ~ I ~ ~ / i i w • - ~ i ~ 1 i _ ~ S O 1 ~ ------ i S ~ ----'- ; g .. 1 ~ _ ; ... g .. I 1 . ; M T i ~ O 1 j O 1 i O I i ~ ~ • ~ w ~ ~ 1 I 1 1 j = 1 I ~ 1 r ~ ~ r w _ _ . 1 ~ 1 i O i N ~ 1 j O ~ ~ O ~ 1 O 1 p' ~ ~ 1 1 p~ i • 01 i ~ i I 1 1 / 1 1 1 I 1 r I 1 r 1 I 1 1 1 ~~~ _ r ..J M¢ ~ O 1 S 1 ; O I S S ~ N N 1 O O ~ O ~ ; i O i pp~~ . OI 1 Q ; W • Y ~ ~ • 1 1 1 1 ~ 1 I~pC ~O 1 N ~ M I~7 I 1 i ; ~ 1 ~ 1 1 i i ¢ • r~ • ~ _ _ 1 1 O ~ O .. _ ~ _ _ _ . 1 O O 1 . 1 _ .. j S 1 O I _ _ _ ~ ~ ~ O i ; 1 1 ~ . OI • 1 • ~ 1 1 1 I O O 1 _ 1 C $ 1 p 1 1 ; 1 ; 1 I I •~ • 1 ~ ~ M M / 1 j i 1 i I ~ j ` ~ O O 1 S O I O S r ; O S ~~ • j ~ 1 ~ 1 i ~~ I O p O 1 S O 1 ~ O O O i 1 ~ 1 1 1 / ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ r f V 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 N N ~ b~ 1 ~ 1 1 1 I p p C G p ; S S S O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ S S O O - - _ - ; O O O S - - - ~ r = 2 W - ~ , O O 1 ~p $ 8 D l.=. ~ i Q OC 1 i O O ~ N N ; aM0 IMO i ~ 1 w w j - ~ 1 I 1 1 to i ~ 1 r S 1 ~ O O O O ~ O O O S~~ p p _ _ _ ~; O O O O ~~ p p p ~; 2 O 1 O yy~~II f 8 S 1 O 1 1 ~ O 8 O MO _ 1 .~-~ 10 Y] N . ; S S ~ ~~ N 1'N7 1 Y'1 O~ S 1 Y9 ..r p l~ 1 Mf M ~ 1 I I j 8 . I .~ p~ p~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O O O S ~ ~ ~ p~ p~ ~ ~ ~ OO ~ O S _ _ ~ ~ p_ ~ S OO S 1 / ~ 1 ~ 1 O op Qp Qp 8 1 O O O O p p pp I p 00 00 00 8 1 Vf O Y') O ~ j 1 1 1 ~ ti~~ O 1 M / ; ~+ N 1 !~ Iff Y'f t+ 1 `~ j 1 {/9 rr M O ~ rT O ~ .r 1 1 1 W /- N V 1 1 -~ 1 ~ I I / r I/ 1 I/HII J W Z ¢ j / ~ 1 W 2 ¢ 1 1 1 I ; N Q 1 I 1 ; I r VI W i d OC ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ COOO r d OC V /~ ~ 1 - 1 d OC V~ ~ W~ 2 P- O d ` V 1 ~ ~ 1 1 ; _ F 1 O C 1 _ 1 i 1 1 VI 1 10 1 1 1 Y 7d. I I" I " ~ 1- OC 1y i ID i OWG i ~= 1 j I 1 ~ I p i U7 N= i cc~p~ae~ i r y I ~ Y I i .~~. ~~~pp y G~ I~ I i /f J 1 OL / 01 = Yf 1-- i N~ V N ~ ; ~ ! ~ O ~ u ; N ~ 1 N~ O ~ 1 i 1 ~ 1 1 / 01""C O H 2 I O Q CO 2 1 ~ p -- OC / N IY ~ 1 ~ ; I ~~ 1 N I r . . . ~ . . 1 ~ . . ~ 1 W~~~ { ~ 1 O~~ J I {y~~ p~ 1 O fO 1 / 1 ~ S~ 1 ~ 1 1 r- 1 1 ~ ~,,1 j OC O Q 1 O O O S ~ OC I 1 1 / y S i N~ ~ / If! q y oZ t 07" 1- O 1 N 1 ; O$F- ~ 1 i w r r w r w Ii a/ • I/ r r r w w w r w r w w w w w w w r r r w r r w r i r r• w C-9 ~ ~~ ec N ~ V ~ v H F• w W V _W~ N •• r r w r w w• w• 0 11 •• r•• w• u w•• r• r r••• r r•• r• r r i g g g g -= g g~ g !! g g$ g i g g g g i 0000 ~ o0 o'i ~T1` { oo~~ = oeoo Z r 1 Y f Y 7 ~ 10 1 1 ~ _ i gg ~g p ~ iif irS ~ '~ '•a 1 ! i ~ i o ~ ~ 1 1 i ~ ~ o / 1 i ~ e 1 1 i 1 i _ i - g - - - i ; - - g g - - ' i - ; - - g $ - - i i - ; - - - g - - i i - a 1 O i 1 1 ~~ 1 ~~ 1 O 1 :~ 6 ~~ s~ 1 1 1 1 s i ssss ;sgsg s M I O ~ ~ w~ V~ F 1 1 O M I~f b ~ O 1 p : T 1 ~ 1pp 1 O ~ 1/9 ~7 p~~ o p p ; 119 N .N.I p~~ N 1 1 ~ 1 1 8 C ~ 8 j 8 ~ 8 0 : N .01 1 ; = ; O I O I Y9 Y9 i ~ / i {/1 OZ : QI .~•~ i i ~ ~ 1 j 1 _ _ 1 1 ~ ~ I / I I 1 1 1 8 1 S 1 O 1 1 O O i : ~ ~ 01 ~ O i ~ i O O i i 0O p O ~ O O i i teal W I•"I ~ I i 1 i 1 i i o g i 7- O ~OCC • a J N 1~ _ O •~ 1 I 1 ; _ G _~_ ~ O 1 1 1 1 ; 1 1 I O O 1 1 1 1 _ .. _ _ _ _; O I O ~ 1 M M 1 1 1 .. - __ 1 O O O i pp V'I IPI 1 O N N 1 1!!ff N ~+ 1 1 I 1 i i 1 1 • m w _ ~ • 1 1 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 8 O I ~~ 1 j 1 ; 1 ~ ~ O O 1 1 I I ; I O 1 O 1 1 ~ N N ~r ..~ 1 I 1 O O i O O I SS O i I I 1 I i ~ ~ ~~ I 1 ~ 1 1 1 1 o 1 1l•1 G 1 ~ j 1 I 1 I O O O O ~ 1 O O S S 1 0O O O O 1 O O O O 1 Q iD ~ D ~ 1 O O ~ O O 1 ~ M O {~ M ~r O e i 0 0 0 0 ~ O M O M i OO N Ill m 1 y7 N m Y 7 1 ; ~ O W Q ~ E ~ ~ ~ 1 1 1 1 / 1 ~ ~ + f Om'I ~ N t M QI r1 .-I 11 p 1 Y09 N ~ 119 1 N OI N 1 w 1 pp ~~ 1 Y~•! N Ifl N 1 ~ t0 m 1 1 1 I I I 1 1 8 O 8 S 1 1 _ O - - S - - - 1 1 1 O S 1 1 1 O 8 0O I 1 I I O O pQ 8 1 ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ 88 p 1 8 oQ f p 1 O O p ~ ; p 0Op p 1 ~ 1/') {f] 1 1 pp p p p i 0O O O S ~ 1 pp~ ~ p~ p~ ~ ~ ~ 0O O O S ~ pp~ p~ p~ p~ ~ ~ 1 0O O O S ~ ~ p~ ~ ~ p~ 1 0 0 0 0 I pQ pp pQ O O O G ; oO 8 8 O r+ O ~1 p ; O M O M ~~ ~ p ~ p p 1 {~ m 01 N I 1 ~~~ m 1 01 fn l+ S 1 ~ I 1/'1 O l~ M ~ 1 I 1 ~ 1 .~+t MT w w 1 N~M ..1 1 ~bm i D H O 1•" V W j J / W Z N I•~ 1 \~ O ~ d OC V H 1 1 1 ; W~ 2 F~ \ 0 0 d DC V F• / 1 W~ Z~ 1 \ 0 0 1 d OC V H 1 1 W 7 2¢ 1 \ 0 0 1 d OC V 1- ~ ~ 1 I . ~ ~ . 1 1 1 I I I 1 1 1 1 f 1 1 1 1 1 I d gi I 1 = I { p DC Z ~tppi pp1~ ~ ; V = Z ; { „I = 2 ; V 3 Z ~ i W 11 i 01 ~ M N H i ~~pp 8 .+ N~ I~ p ~~pp p 1 8 N M 1+ H 1 /'N7 ~ N V H i N -J "ar ; / m 1 ^ O ~ 1 1 1 N N~ O N 1 N w 10 O~ I ~ I 1 N= ,y I ~ ~ ~ i I ~ 1 y~~ ~ Z i N ~ K ~ ~ -~ 1 O~L O~G tZ- ~ { /1 1 ~ O~L K ~ Z ~ 1_ ~ 1 OI O O~C -_ - 1 ' i ~ WW y i y / O ~ ~ ~ { 2Wp ~ y ~ G 1 p ~ p { ~ ~ ~ OG ... .. _ ~ m ~ O J OC _ 1 1 ~ OC _ _ i OC _ ~ ~ J 1 1 O ~ i. ~ OC ; ~ . . i / ~ O~ r ~ ; Y O 1-~ 1 1 ; W M~ 1 / ~ ~ 7 H i ~ ~ ~ m~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 3 w • • w • w w • • • r • r w • • • • • w • • ~ w • w • r r • Ii • r • w w w • • Ci-1~ ~ w w w w w w w• w• w w u r w w w• w w w w r w w w w w w w w w w r r w w w w 8888 8888 j8888 18888 j ~ o e e o 0 0 0 0 j o~ Q Q j o 0 o e j pO S 28S [~ 1 j V~ • i 0 0+ r. 1 1 .......... g ........... _ ....... ~ ...... . 8 / 8 1 8 ° 111 ° ~ o j e 1 1 j 1 1 ~n 1 j 1 1 ~O •----------;-------j-------_------- 1 8 8 8 8 g w 'd ~ O o j Q Q 1 ~ 1 1 j ~Ci ~i = ~ o i ~ 1 11 1 .~ 1° 1 j w _ ~ ~ j j ~ i w .. ~ ~ .. .. ! 1 1 w ; 8 1 ... 1 ... _ ... ~ _ ..... 1 1 _ w 1 1 ~ I ~ 1 O O 1 :oM+ j O 1 ° ~ O 1 j Ii j j j j °I a+ j ._ ! j j j ~~ ~ j O O j 1 1 ~--- p p 8 ~ 1 1 O p 1 8 / 1 w ~ O O O 1 O 1 ~ Q ~ j r ; o. j o: o+ j j j g j M~ ~ .~-~ 1 N N j 1 1 I"f 1y 1 1 • • 1 1 V~,,~ 1 ~ ~ p p ~ J 1 ~ 8 I O 8_; ~ ; O O J 1 O G tr-- ~ » ~ . '.~ ; ~ ~ m 8 j In In j 1 ~' "' j 1 V f 1 1 O O • 1 1~ ~ti w J 1 I • Q . ~ ~ ~ ~ . V p~[~[ ~- V I p 1 pp p _ 2 0 to w W O j G O ~ ~~ j Q 1 1 Q¢ V OD w . pt ~ O O I YO'f YOY I I N N ~ ~O _ 1 .~ 1 1 I"1 M 1 0 0 1 s 1 I 1 j V ~ 1 w . . . . . . . _ 1 1 1 j w p _ _ .... ~ _ . ~ . . . . ......... . . 1 g g Sg 1 °0 S 1 ~ i S g pQ g pg ~ 1 ~ pp~1 N ; w w ' O ; O C O j # ~ 1 M w w I e V 1 1 N 1~ ~ 1 w I 1 ~ fV I w 1 1 1 1 aO 1 s ... _ ! _ _ ~ I 1 I w _ _ . .. _ ... _ _ . _ _ _ 1 _ _ j w {p I gg ~ °o eo° i °o °o $ g i °o °o °o ~ i g ~ ~ o° _ _ _ I w 2 2 W ; y~ ~ 0 0 I O O O O ~ G ~ O ~ M ~ 0 ~ y1I'~~ 11~~ 1 1 N N 1 a0 O O VY j N ~ 1 ~ Q ~ 1 j 1 ~ ti 1 ~ w O ~O I / O~ r 1 1 1 I O I » 1 1 w I ..~ _ 1 p pp _ _ 1 1 ~ ~ j 8O7 ~/pO'/ 8g j ~ ; ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ; O ~ ~ o K q j IV fV tff ; O ~ O / O~ ~ ' ~j 1 ~p ~ ~ 1 r d 1 j 1 1~ ~ 1 I I 1 I p p p p p I j 8 0 0 0 j O O__- i 8 8 0 0_-- 1 S O O p__- ~ 1 $888 1y~~~1y1~I~~ s~~~yy~~~1 1 ~~~0 1 w j V~~ If~~ 1 N N j t0 O O N 1 N 1/~ ~ j « 1 I 1 1 V7 N ~ I w j j j j o 1 1 I aq 1 1 w W 1 1 1 1 j w ~'yp'~ 1 {~~~,/ j ~JJ ' j j i F~ (,~ j W i 2~ j Vf Q 1 N Q 1 1..~y ~ I w N 1 d OC OV ~O I W~~ O 1 W s 0 0 1 W~ 2 1Q- j w W~~~ 1 j d OC V I- 1 d K V I- 1 d OC V~ 1 w j ....._. ~ _._._.1-. ~ ._..__ ~ 1 ~ 1 m 1 N N j V ; ; .. ~~ ... ~ 1 1 F~ H 1 1 1 w ~ 1 j 1 1 ~ j r j jY / H -~ Z ~ j a0 1 w 1~ S 1 j ~ OG Q 1 1 1~ W I o~ 2 j H s ~ j dye= I v j c~1/f¢= W 1 /"f ~ 1 _. pt I w ~ J 1 N ..r _ M 1- 1 = = y~ 6 ~ 1 N ^D '- j IMi _. OC p ~ 1 M I .Or 0 ~. 1 1 O K W j 1 N~ 1 N= aC -- 1 w 1 m ~ j ,Q Yl ~ tD ~ 1 O~ 1 1 ~ I I i~ -~ _ ~~ff g If'1 1 I em pt 1 A j OC O H~ 1 1 O w H Z J 1 ~ H F- S~ 1 6 ~'1 V^ F-• j w ~Ze 1 1 11 K d' ~Hp ~ S~ I w .. .. ~ 1 O[ _O y1 {y 1 ~ ~O' W O ¢ j a0 OC O y=j W 1 {p1p O 2 ~ ~ 1 W .~ OC ~ ~ ~ ~ J ~ N ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 O tai ~ W 1 ~ 1 1 1 ~.. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 • ~ 1 ~ ~ 1 I 1 / 1 1 1 O~ Q • ~ Ii 1.. 1 ~ O OL I J (~~,~ j Z ~ 1 A 1 ~ j A I- Of 1 S~ -- w 1 ~~ ~ ~p~ 1 1 ,pJ/ H w 1 ~ V ~ 1 1/l ~ ~ .... 1 N OL IA ~ ~ _~ 1 _ S 1~~ LJ v 1 w 1 a0 / M O 1~ 1 3~ q 1 w w w• w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w i1 w• w w +I w w w w u a• r r•• C-~1 = w w w w• w w r w w r• w w w w r w w w w w w w• w w• w w w• /r w r w w• w g g g g ~ g g g g ~ g S g g 1 8 8$ 8 w o~ ~ o 0 0 o i o 0 0 o i o 0 0 o i o o d d 1~ r- i / 1 1 _ ~ ~ 1 i i 1 ~ $ ~ i 1 S II - ~ i ~~ ~------~---g---~---g---~---g-------g---s 9E i ° ~ e i o o S i 1 ~~~ Z i i N _N ~ ~ i i i / O ~ ~ .... ... ... .. .. 1 .. ~ ... / • 1 8 8 i g ~ ....... _ ~ •• 1 O i C 1 O / ~ i Ot 1 I i / O 1 • 1 1 1 1 i :~ 1 i I 1 ~ , ~ 1 ~ 1 1 1 I _ _ 1 - • 1 8 i 8 ~ $ ; 8 ~ _ _ ; 1 ~ : 01 1 O I O 1 O 1 O 1 ppN~1 i i i i 1 M : Ot 1 1 1 1 1 _ i i 1 w ~~~~ I 1 1 1 w 1 8 i 8 1 8 / 8 1 M 01 O I O i O 1 O i w 1 1 i 1 i 1 :~ i I ~ i • i 1 i 1 i M ~ : : 1 / 1 w -~ _ ! 1 = 1 w Q : ~ . I 1 «~ ~ g .. i ....... ........ s I O i 1 w~ o i ° I 1 O i g i 1 w W _ 1 i O i O 1 O i E€ : avu o. i i i i i ~l _ ~ 1 r yl w 1 ~ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ~ _ ~ v ~~ i $g i Og i $~ 1 _____._ 1 ~~~` ~~ O i Zvi i fit` 1 08 i Qz po pC I O V 001 s O'1 i ~~ i M M i O O i ~ ~ 1 OC ~ ...1 = ~ ~ ; ti ^ i M M ~ m m i ~ ~ 1 w 1 1 1 1 1 - 1 1 w ty w ~ pp pp I ____ __ 1 N ~ i 0 O i G 1 ~ 1 O pp~ __~ 1 w I O O I 8 1 O ~ 0 0 i m ~ i ppO O i ~ m~ i ' _~ i S$ i MM i 1 ao~i i • 1 i 1 1 1 = ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ p~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 1 1 w 1 O O O O _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ~ w J 1 I O O O O i O O O O I O O O O i w a to C 1 O O M M i 0 0~~ ; O O oO O 1 O O l~ {~ 1 w = = W 1 w O D OL i ~~ i M M 1 O O 1 0 m 1 w c° ~~u i ~M 1 .~.°o i aMOm ~ o. o. ; w Q 1 I 1 1 N IV 1 w~~~_ ~_ 1 I 1 1 1 1 p _ p_ p 2 ~ 8O O O S ; OO O S 1 poO pO 8S i 0O O O S--- 1 • O 0 I O l~ ~ Ot i O ~ a0 1 y'! 1!7 O i O O O O I w ~ 1 I AA 1~ / 1~ d V ; N a00 m l+ ~ N ~ w 1 N N i ~ M N~ 1 p p p p 1 1 ~ 1 i O O 8 1 O O S i O O O S I i N 10 M f ~ N ti m i O~ i w M O 1/"! 1 i i i i M M i 1°u i i i i i ~ ~ 1... 1 i / i ; ,. ~~ ~ doc~O i due V° i d~ V° i Ws~o i w i 1 d' 1 w 1 i ~ 1 1 1 w 1 i nc 1 i _ 1 ~ ~ 1 M~~ i N 1 ~ M i w 1 1 o ~ 1 ~ 1 w /- = 1 N~ ~ I b 1 1 ~ 1 ~ V Z 1 M~ W M_ 1 M O i L~ pQp[[ Q H ¢ W 0 i pp = 2 1 N ~ i w N I .`r OC 14 i ^ ID ~~ (.O ~ i N N Ot ry /... 1 s p ~ i O O i O i O~ 10 Q i 1 =~ O I I ~ g ~ 1 I 1 = ~~~~~ ~ J i m N 1 O V u W 2 1 ~~~ 1 1 1 = i ~ i yNyy// ~ _.__ ~ W 1 K~F i OTC ~~ 1 D OOC i A D F / w H / 1 1 Oc O I 1 ~ i J ~ v i 0 ~ _~ ~ / Op~/~ ¢O .Mr i O ~ _~ ~ 1 ~ ~ 1 K ~ ~ i ~ ~ v ~. ; ~ N 6 ~~ i ~ Iff u ` i I p1 1 ~ J 1 w i M~p~ V t/1 i ~~ c! yf ; ~ V Q¢ i M~ V Vf 1 ~ I O K r Ir i ~ OC -: ¢ oc I-: oc ~. 1 ~ ac 1-: ~ i .~ w w w w w r~ w• w• w w w~• w w r w w w~ w w w•• w w w w w w w w w w it I ~-12 = w u/ w r r w w w w r w r r r w w r r r•" '1 •• w w r w r• w w• r w w w•• • p p p 1 r y1 1 0 8 0 8 1 0 0 0 8 i O O O 8 i O O 8 8 j r ~ ~ O O 8 I I ~~ 1 Pp~ ; O ppO O~ /O' ~ 1 O 0• O O ~ O O O p S • ~ ~ N 10 wMi L~ 1 1 .1 $ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~• ~ ~ ! 1 s __ ___..__ _--___- i~------- __-~-~-_- 1 ..-~~~~ 1 1 - 8 1 O S 8 / 8 1 •~~ M O ~ O ~ O ~ p• /~ • / 1 1 1 1 s _ ~ t ~~ = s 8 8 1 - ~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 1 O O ; A 1 O 1 a 1 s~ ~ o ~a ! ~~ _ '~ ~ ~~ ; ~ ~ sss. c g s -g---; 1 1 • 1 1 , 1 :~ ~~~ r 1 1 1 I 1 i 1 1 1 I 1 1 / ~ / ; O ; ~ ; - ~ - - - ; 1 O s , 11~~ 1 Q I 1 / O ` / r~ OI j ~ ~• 1 1 j i 1 1 ~ ~• ~ j ; I 1 r VQQ - - ~ - - - - - - - - - - - 1 ~ r O 1 o I o- - - - ~ - - p- p- - - ~ , - - - - - - - - r~ ~ Q ; 8 t 8 ~ O O ~ O ; H QI 1 1 1 I i r V 1 ~ 1 1 O V I O 1 1 • W ~Of 1 I 1 1 ~~~ ~~ ~ O QI 1 1 j ti w i 1 1 I ; ~ ~y ~ ~ 1 j 1 ~/ ~ r - ~ - - - - .- - - 1 - - - - - ~- - - - ~ - - - W I- ~ ~ ~ 1 00 1 ~ ; ---- - I -- ~ - Y~~ • I 1 1 O O I p 1 OOOQOQ==pCC ~„t ~ ~ OI 1 O ~ ~ ~ DO ~O ~ SO ppS t~ r m 1 I ~ ~~ ~ O O ~ r 1 1 N N r .~-, 1 I 1 f~ 1 m m ~ = ~ I ; ~ ~ f I 1 I {{Wnn s I O 1 O I O O O O 1 pp p 1 1 I I 1 I 1 O S ~ mm~ ~ ~ O i O u") O 1A_ i O O 1 1 _ » ~ I ; N~ O 01 ~ I r 1 I 1 •' IG 01 w I 1 r - - - - ! ~ I 1 ~ ~ ~ 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 ~ ¢ cn o i$ o 0 0 ,° o o g ~ o 0 0 0 ~ o° g$ g--- ~ c=~ l o 0 0 o i °o g o° °0 1 0 0 0 0 ; ~ 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 ' o 0 0 0 , o~ a o 1 s pp w - O 0 1 0 0 O ~ 11.1 pp_ ~ O V 7 Y7 O 1 0 0 1 • C W W ~ M O~ O N 1 N a00 .~-• O 1 N [~ N N I 1 = Q ~ 1 {A a0 ~ ~ Y7 ; ..ti a0 N M ~ ~ pmf 1 1 r~ I 1 1 1 - - ; - - - pp- - - - ; - - - p- - - - - p- - p- o- - - - - = 1 ~ ~ O• 1 ~ O 1 O O p 1 S pQ R s I ~ W O I 1 1 O O j 1~1 1~ ~ 1 1 w 1 _ i = 1 i p p p pp p p p pp 1 1 1 O O O O 1 O O O O - - - ~ O S p - - - ; - - - - - .~ - ; Qg QQ Q~ QQ ggemy 8 Og 8 I s + ~~ ; ~ '•" ~ ZS 25c_~ ; So2525 i a$17SZS ' i 1 p p 11~ r / M OI 11'l b 1 N aOp .Mi /Pl 1 N ~ yNj = ~ ~ N mO • ; YY••// 1 f /Yf''l1 1 N M 1 ~ O j r 1 j 1 1 ~ r ~¢ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ 1p~ = yN ~ 1 r W 1 d OG V ~0 1 d~ UCCCCC r0 1 W~ 2 O 1 W O G 1 M - - - - - ; - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 d O C OV 1 • - ~ d K OV ! - ~ r I 1 1 -- - - ~. --- ~ r 1 1,„1 I - - # 1 l0+ 1 1 1 ~ r 1 1 1 v• 1 ~~ ~ Z 1 1~ I 1 l I ~ O~ ~ V ~ J ~ 1 /-- 1 GO i w 1... _ • 1 V ~ ~ ~ N J / r K ~ 1 W ~ p_ • _ ~ ~j ~ N ~ ~ W M J Qp~~ _ 1~ p~ A C 1 1 = 1. p~ 1 1 ~w W~~ ~ n1 O L Ff F~ i ~ {b Q_ 1 p O I ~ {G~ O ~ pS OI V.1 O ~ ppp W ,¢Q,1 1 ~ ~ ~~Ipp O m {gyp ~ ~ 1 O~G C 1(=p- {•y~ ~ ~1p OC 1.07 -_- ~ ~ O ~ {~/,~/ 2 ~ 1 ~ - - - .~ - ! O ~ 1O' •W-/ ~ - _ 1 ~ ~ -O- J OC ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ QZ {O~ 1 w 1 ~ 1 N . . w 1 - 1 1 1 ~p yp~MfO Q~ i ~ b~Qv 1 Oc ~Mp ,-~-~{/~ / Oc 1~~rp~QO {/gym 1 A / ~~Mpp .¢,,,,/1 V V ~ i WZ V Y. ; M ~ [~ Ij ~ ` ~ p_N L~ p Q V ••./ 1 t O 10 F. ~ I ~ N V 1 i ~M~pp W~ iy V ..-LG 1 1 w r r w w w w w w w w w r t o Z; r= ; `8 ~ ~' 1 O iO 1•. d• j r w +i r w w w w• w r w•• r• w w w w r w r I w w w w C-13 ~ r w r w M M r p r r r O r w r M M p• r p r r r r r w r p w p r p r r w r r w• r p r r• r r ~ ~ O S S S 1 O H O S ; H O O 8 i S S S 8 j }t~ = O O 8 p ^!~ p O8 1 OdQQ OOOO S OOOO• j O O y1g~ 1y/~i ~ i / H S H / N IV ' i w Iy ~ 1 1 yyy~~~~~ =---g---~---g---~---g---_ _g i ... - - - - - - / O - - - - - / fj ~ ; O• 1 O 1 i1! 1 ' VI N ~ - ; t i ~1 O - 1 1 1 / 1 / / ... .. .. ~ .. .. /~ .. .... 1 ~ i S S g i S 8 S ;___ g___ i 1 8 i .~. ~ ~ ~ N Iri n i ~ i r 1 1 1 1 / ~ ~ i ~ i ~ i # ~ ~ 1 I r / O ~ 1 1 8 1 M . Gn 1 1 O 1 O 1 O 1 ~ ~ j 1 j 1 ~ M ~ 1 j ~ ~ A ~ 1 1 / i O 1 N 1 8 1 O ' H 1 Hp Hp / • GA 1 ~ 1 O ~ NN ` 1 A pp~~ 1 / 1 1 1 M~ w j 1 j / ~~ j N J , ~ 1 S ~ S 1 S S O j # GC D ! I O 1 O 1 Y'1 p Y'1 I 1 1 n 8 !~ A Q yVj ~ 1 1 ' I ~ ~O I 1 1 ' r y{,,~ ; O / 1 _ ~ _ _ ; _ _ _ I M~ 1 O ~ O 1 0 0 O S I oO S p O p S - - ~ CQp '~YYaa~~/•• ~ A ~ i O ~ O 1 O O O O i Vf S O Iff i GC Y w 01 1 1 ; ~ ~ 1 ~ I w N~~ I M ~ 00 M ; w I 1 1 uVJ r 1 1 1 ~ ~ ~ O~ N ~ ~ 8 ; S ~ S ~ S i r I Gi ; I / • m i I O i O / O ~ • - m i 1 i ' i s -~., 1 i I i I • ~ I ~ 1 I ~ J 1 O pS O O ~ O oqS 8O 8S ; O O SO O - - - ~ O O O S _ - - _ « O p GL' 1 S O B S I O O p p 1 O O O O ~ pp n N 01 I 1 p {!'! •O 11'9 10 r t- ~ O 1 w~ GO S i N~ N M t w N ~ I N GM j A Q W OWC 1 I ; ~ w ~ ~~~ b ; 1 I p ~ p~ ~ ~ S 1 S 1 8 1 S S--- M ~ = 1 8 Oo r O O I O I O 1 C 1 O p I M W H j 1 1 1 i r ~ W I ~ t ~ ~ ~ I r 1 1 1 1 ~ 1 r I 1 1 I I • ~ ~ ~ 1 / I I r r ~ S O S S 1 O S O O 1 S S S S - - i S S S S - _ _ w ~_ ~ ~ ~ 8 ~ 1 w~ GOD S ; N U9 If1 M ~ ~ N~~ i r M N O ~ r j 1 N i I N a n 1 M 1 1 / 1 / • ; / ; 1 ; r QHQ ~ % ~ 1 ~ A L H j ~~ 1 F~ J 1 H ~1 1 / r O 1 W 3 2 F~ 1 CA Q 1 _ iA Q / ~~. 1 r W V ~ .. 1 d GI\G V ~O ; Gl ~ ~ ~O 1 d OC V ~O ~ d O~C ~ O~ i r _ _ ... _ ..... _ . ! i I r 1 Y 1 .. ~ .... . ~ 1 W ~ i ~ 1 r 1 ~ 1 1 1 1 r i ~-' 1 i 1 i « 1 Y j 1 ~ I M S 1 ~ / ~ 1 1 1 Y 1 _ 1 • i m ,,,1 1 W 1 e 1 1 yV W ~Y[ pp ~~pp M ~1 J 1 Gr / 1..1 1 T n • N -- I l~l O GNp~ 1 ~ Gpp 1 1 w y 1 N= 1 N~ S M y~ i r ~ 1 0 2 1 ~~ _ ; 1 10 ~ o~ ; 1 ~ O J i r 1 / 1 ~ r. 1 F. Z i FK I r .. ... i~-• ~ DO ice.. ~ ~ i 1p K O W yV~ i {~p G[ o W i . ... ... ~ C W 1- J OL 1 O V H .J ~ _ ~ Y / p~ 1 1 1 I ~ W 1 Q~ 1 0 1 O 1 1 1 H 1 H H~ -~ / Q 0 r f- 1 J w~ w 1 ...I w~ 1 H~~ o 1 K~ y~~jj „~ 1 r ~ v~~~ 1 i yqyq~/1 1 1 s~ppy/ ~ 1 V 1-~ ~ 1 ~ V ~ I O ,T. V N I r I w~~ 1 1 -= W i -: r i r r // r r• r i r r r r r r• w w r r r• r• i r r r r• r r~ r r r w r• r• C-~~ .. ~'~ ~~ • ~ N D ~ O a °: W ~ S N H V m ~'. ~ WV N I~ /I w w r w r w w w w w• w «/ • w• w w // w // w w w w w w u w w w w w w w w w w IIi ~ g g g S i g g g g 8 8 8 8 i g g g g o i O 0 0 0 = o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ o 0 0 0 ~ 2575a 1 / ~ ---- i o _ --g-------g---=---a---~ 1 $ i iii i 1 • 1 1 M ~ . . . ... 1 i 1 ` 1 .. ~ ...... ~ .. ..... ... . i 8 8 ~ 8 i 8 g 1 x :a i$ ~ i x = 1!f : Y'f IA s 1 » ~' ; 1 1 1 / 1 i 8 i 8 i S8 i gg--- 1 1 1 i ~~ $~ i 1 / / ~ ~~ ~a o ~ - ' - - - - ; i : : p p p p 8 O g 1 1 8 - - - 1 S ~ O p O p8 1 / ~ .~ 1 O / O 1 O~ 8 i ~ 1 pp~~ I m 1 ~ ~ 01 ; i i m M iV ; ~ 1'09 ~ ~ _ _ _ 1 i S ~ S i S S S-- S S g---~ 1 ~ ~~ ~o+ ~ o i O i ~8~_ ~ X75 N d - - ' - - - - ' ' 1 w ' ~ - - - p 1 - - O ~ - - - ; - O - O - - - ; - - - - - - - ; 1~ O 1 O j S S 1 Opp pO 1 O 1 1 01 1 t O~ 01 1 O S 1 1 1 1 1 I ~ pOt, Q1 1 1 I ~ ~ 1 i N N ~ ~O 10 1 ~ / _ 1 _ _ _ _ / 1 1 i / O ; 1 1 .. _ .. . i p j ~ O ~ S O 1 8 1 O I 1 ; O 1 O Qo 1 ~ I ~ • ; ~ ~ S O 1 G ~ O i 1 I 1 m 1 1 O 1 ~ I 1 ti 1 1 wOI ~ j ~ 1 I 1 ' J ~ S O O O 1 S S O pS 1 O O O O 1 O O O O - - - O~ OC 1 0 0 0 0 j O O S 8 ! O I~ S 111 1 ~~ 0 0 1 _~ _ ~ / p $ I O 4, W 1 Y'1 .O.1 IIY O i ~~ j m VI ~ j w~ O 1 Q OC ; O~ ~ M M 1 N f7 ~ I w t b 1 1 1 1 1 O ; O O S S 1 O O O 1 O 8 - - - 8 S 8 pp p 1 O 1 O i O O O O ~ O O O 1 O mN 1 = 1 p 1 M 1y/~y 1 W ~ 1 f f N S 1 h w N'/ i M 1+1 ~ ~ S O O S ~ O O O S 1 O O S S i O O S S i Q5~ g I 1 i S S o~ i S~~~ i 5~ 8 ~_ i g~ g 1~ ' 1 Y•1 O V9 O ~ IA O N !~ 1 pf N I ; 1 Y/'~l 1 j 1 1 ~ 1 1 1 1 1 1 ,,~~t1 1 1 S f~/f 1 N Q 1 ~ ~ j ~ i 1.. ~ H fO.a 1 W Z~ O i W?~ O 1 W S~ O j W~~ p 1 d OC V 1- _-_ 1 d OC V H 1 d OY V F- ; d OG V /- 1 1 1 ........ .. ~ .. .. .. . 1 1 w / 1 ~C / ~ 1 t W P•~ j j ~ 1 ~ = 1 K F~ = 1 1 1 j O 1 K L i M j ~ i K 1 1 ~I 1 1 N tD 1 ~ 1 ~ = Z 1 V Z = 2 1 V~ 2= 2 1 I __ C 1 p O / p~ O 1 IVj/ ~ ~ • N ~ ~ I~fp! ~ 1~ ~ N ~ O Of F- 1 nl ~p 1 GGGW 1 p== O ~ 1 J OI O~ 1 /1 = N O~ i N K= N~ j I m .~-. .O.1 (yp1 ; ~ w 1 10 ¢ 1 ~ V 1~~ 1 ~ h~ ~ ^ H ~ O O H~p i W OL ~ Z i O OG r i 1 .Z~ O H ~ 1 VO ~ • "' ~ V i / ~ OL O W ^^ 1 !`~Q OC O ~ y~ 1 ~ K O ~ yVj 1 ~ OC O W 1y 1 O ~- -- ~ $ ~ 1 O ~ -- ..J OL 1 000 a~ ~-. J OC 1 GGG 1~ ~ ~ OC / / ~ .. ...~ / 1 j ~ 1 ~ 1 1 1 D 1 p 1 0 / O / 1 -~ t 1- ~ ~ 0~ ~ OC D 1 1 ~ ~ 1 ~ 1 1 1 1 ~ Qy 1 V~1 F- H ~ D ~ M~ 1'7 1 !_- O OG ~ 1 ~ p N V ; ~ N ~ " 1 1 IA J V N 1 J V ~ 1 {~ypQ t00 {y 6 y/ / ~ O ~ F ~ ~ 1 G ~ F~ ~ 1 > -~ W i ~ > H ly / w w w w w w i- r• w w w w w i1 w••• w w r o• s• w w w w i/ w w w w w w w w C-15 ~ ~ ~ ~~ •~~ ~c® _~ ~_ V W ~ 2 }TO(I H u m OC ~~~+ WO N ~ w w r w• w w r w w r w w w w w w• w w w w w w w w w w w w• w w r• w w w w i ~ = 8 8 8 8 i 1 8$ 8 8 I g g g g g g g g o oeSoo 0000 0000 eooo ~ Z t ~ _ _ _ c _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ~ ~ _ ~ g _ ~ _ _ _ _ _ _ ~ _ ~ _ _ _ _ _ _ ~ _ _ _ _ _ _ g _ i o o 1 i = 1 ~ . . ...._ _ _ 1 ~ g ~ _ _ _ _ = ... 1 O g _ . ~ ~ ... 1 $ 1 i . ...... 1 / O . / / i ss = ~~ = o t a ~ ~s ~~ 1 1 1 , ss • i s g~ i s 1 1 ; O ~ O ; C 1 ~ : M ~ ~ F ~ 1 1 i I !V : 07 1 O O 10 ~O 1 i ~ 1 , ~ 1 1 1 t - ,- ~ 88 ,- - - - ~ 8 ~ - ,- - - - - - - ~ 8 - - - - - - - - ~ 8 - - ~ :~ ~py1 ~ ~ V') N O , 1 ~ O , 1 ~ ~' ~ 1 / 1 1 N ~ G 1 p~ : 01 1 ~ mp ; M 1~ 1 t i / 1 ~ j 1 1 I 1 ~ I 1 1 1 1 H ~ O {{ ~ ~ O O O S ; .. O . ~ S _ _ _ . _ _ p ~ S _ _ _ ~ ~ ~ p ~ i S ~ i J O I pQ pQ p 8 1 O I O 1 p¢~ ~ Ly : IW~ p~ : Ot ; O_ O O G I ~ w R ~ 1 % 1 ~ ~ ~ 1 T ~ Od1~ I 1 1 I 1 L- 1 O i O I ~ `.. I 1 O i O O 1 ' Op'I ' i ; O 1 I i O 1 j i O O ~ 1 i ~ 1 1 ~ 1 ~ 1 1 i ~ a$ ~ I 1 I 1 1 ~ 1 1 O - - 1 _ , O O O O - - _ p_ - , O O O O _ - 1 _ ~ :~ j O 1 O I 1 O C G O 1 O O O G 1 1 ~ i I 1 t~ 1 N~ N N ~ ~ 01 •-• ~ m I i I i O O O O i O O O O i O O O O O i O O O i O p OWC p p S ; O O O O 1 O C O G o ; O O O O op o op 8 j O V~ Q ~ 1 ~ ~ N N ~ 1 ~ ~ O I 1 ~ + ; N N N N 1 j 1 O O O O 1 ~ ...I .MN.I w ~ 1 ~ 1 I Vf 10 1 ~ O 1 ; ; ~.. I 1 ~ ~ p 1 0O ~~O ~_ 0 0 ~ ; O ~~O ~_ O O 1 ~ ~ D ~' W pQ 8 1 O O I N N 1 ~ O 1 i 1 8 ; p O ~ M M / ~ '. ~ j f f 1 ; . i 1 .. . I . .. p p p p 0 0O O O I I ~ / I O O 1 1 O O O O j I O O O O I 1 pp 8 1 O O O O oQ Qp I O_ C pp oQ pq 8 1 O C O O pO pO pQ I~ O O O 1 1 N w 119 ~ O_ p p ~ O 01 1 j 1 f/'f N N M 1 1 / y i .Mr w~ I I j W H w Fj 1 j 1 1 -- J 1 W Z~ O 1 ~ 1 1y- J 1 W Z Z ¢-- O ; ~ 1 1 F. J 1 W 7~ ¢I- 1 ~ 1 ~ ..1 i ~¢ 1 1 1 ~ W V ~ .. 1 d. OC V F- .. 1 . 1 d OC V ~ ; .. ; d OC V O~ ; .. .. 1 ; ~' ~ ~ H . ; ~ .. ' ; ; 1 1 I ~ t ~ 1 h 1 1 W ~ I~I 1 1 1 J 1 O~G ~ ~ 1 N X ~ ~ ~ A /O~ ~ ~ Y! ~ ~ ; N i N ~ ~ j ~/ ; .-. 1 1 1 ~ ~p ~ % _ 1 O ~ [[[ 1 _ _~ ~~ 1 Z V yW/~~ .. ~ C "J ~C y -~ QJ i ~lp+ O y~y O OO[ ~ Vf 1 1 ~~p ~ Q / OO ~ /f~~ _ j 111 I ppC~ 1 O i0 1 1 1 1 1 ~ / ~ 1 1 ~ 1 ~ 1 ; 1 1 ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ j ~ ~j~ 1 K q I 1/~1/'~~ f~py ; = 01 ~ f~v ~ H ~ {r m ~ ~ 1/7 ~N~ v = j {.. 1 ~ ~~ ~ 1 yJ~ V N 6 i ~lOp.. i~// V ~ .~I p w 1 Q V Q~ ~ ~/ p Q U OOOV w ~ i / ~ Y ~ 1 ~ ~ O ...1 /- ~ ~ ~pp ~ i O N - ~ ~ ~~ pp i O N ~ 1 w /1 w w w w w w w w r• r w w w• w w• w w 1 r• w w•• w•~ w w w w• r w~ C~ 16 aw w•• w w w w• w w w• o w w• w w w w w r• r w•• w• w +~ gggg 8 8 8 8 = 8 8 8 8 e W OO1 T 1 V1 a~ .8 8 O~1 11 O 1 ~ je V ~ OiV to ~ ~ 3 l . fV ~ p p 1 .N.1 N w j w Q ~~ I + V r .. ... ~..... ...~ .... . N ... . . . ~ ~ p p p p ~ O O O g '• ~ ~ _V w • • O O 0 0 0 0 1 1 N ~ • ~ ~ ... .... / I ~ ......... . w ~ g g 1 1 g g i g g g g r oQ Qo Yl Y1 1 I 1 V V , fV O ~ ~ _ ' ~ ~•+ 1 / , ^ w r / p 1 NNw~ . = • 1 .. 1 1 8 1 ~ ~ ~ / ....~ i g 1 , p_ p_ pN pN ~ ~ ~ / O O O O i w ~M ~ a ; O j ~ O ~ i y-~18 OM I M _ ~ N w .gi SI 1 t p ~y p7 ( ~ ~ `~m1~fN w - w • i 1 g 1 ....... / ~ g .. . .... . . i g g g g . . ; ~ ~ 1 ° 1 1 O g , O~~ m 1 _ p~ ~O' 1 { / i I : r~~~~ t ~ A 6 ~ ~ ~ i g _ ~ i ... g ! ~ ~ N N _ ~ _ 1 ... ;$ g g g = ¢ W j O ~ O ~ OD /'7 Vf aC 1 • F- OI 1 ~ 1 l~ N N t j ~ ti ~~ 1 1 pp ~~ i t N~ O ~ _> ~ A> 000~~~ 1 1 Y9 m ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~' _ w 3t ~ _ _ 1 _ ~ _ I __ ~ _~_N_ 1 1 _ _ Y ~ ~ A ~ ; ~ 1 ; ~ p p p i O S O S ~ m ~ I p 1 1 1 O I N N 1•'1 ~ u~ ?' ^• r I 4 ~ • ; ~ I 1 O N O N 1 j ~ ~ a0 Y9 N i~ M~ ~ p ~ 1 ~ f N N r ty V1 ~ M 1 1 ~+ _ 1 O 1 _ 1 8 0 0 8 ~ ~ ~ r N ~ O O i O 01 01 ~ ji w 1 1 1 ~ ~ N~ Y M ~ • _ w ~ 1 1 I I ~ pp I ~~ M QN'1 I M O f ^ ^ ti • i r _ _ . . i o$ o o _ _ _ _ ~ g C~ S _ _ _ _ _ _ _ w o 0 0 o i = Q tD D F O D ~ ; o o j ~ ~ ~ 0 O 0p 0 0 N7 O t~ ~ I ~ IG m 11'f O i O N ~ r M D ~~ ~ Imo"! M ~ ~ NN ~ ~ Y 9 ~ ~ w o Q -I i t N Y Y M 1 ~ i N~ m N w 1 .... _ _ . ~ ... _ . . _ _ ~ ~ _ _ _ _ _ w w ~ M V1( w 1 g 1 / g g I p i g O O g M _ 2 = M OO 1 O 1 I O p I I~ 88 i Y7 O M T « w . w 1 1 1 LO m~ w w. ... .~ ~ ~ 1 N H M ~' g g i g g g g w M ~ g g g g w w w pq8 1 1 Qp888 yO'1 ~ O O 1 1 O Y'1 O Vi p ; ~O Y 7 {I'l ~ K w w ~ ~ ~ ~ i .O-I INN ~ ~ ~ _ _ I e~ M M ~ do•1`Fi w w w ~ • p 1 ~ 1 1 ~..Mloo ...I N ~ M Q ~ ~ 1 Q ~ W Z C ~ j W~~ I / 4" ~ W 7 O M • i /f d OC -~ O d OC O ~ MM M~ W~~~~ I ; V~ 1 d OC V H I M r A 1 / i I 4 N = 1 1 1 'J 2 1 1 ~ I I 1 1 A w d P - ~ i u Vl ~ . i t~j = g I ~ « aYi ! _ i I%1 " ~ ~ ~ • H ~ w p ~- pp 1 ~ N 01 •~ 1 N .. r 1 ~~~ O ~, 1 FF~~ ~ 1 J » M ~ 1~1Q11 II 0 / MOC OCR ~ ~ 1 r- M ~ w M ~~ . 1 O~ K 1 ~ - ~ - ~ • u i O W~~ OC - - ; - - --- i e i I-. I . . . . . -- ~ w w w ~ 1 e ' ~~ i o _ ~ ~ ~ ~ w w of ~ ~ ~ i I~ IVI ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ : ~ M w Ir V fn S Q ~ N ~ p 1 1 w w w w r r w r ~ u ~ t ~ • w w w w w i O ~ ~ w r r w w w• r I w• r r r w w w w w• C'~7 ADDITIONAL PROJECT TO BE CONSIDERED FOR SECONDARY ROAD SIX YEAR CONSTRUCTION PLAN - (1990-1996) 1. Taney Drive (Route 1507) - previous flooding of lower level of one house due to inadequate channel and double line of 42" culvert. Drainage crew has excavated upstream and downstream channel this past summer. VDOT proposes additional 42" culvert - estimated cost - $50,000 2. Kelley Street (Route 920) and Meacham Road (Route 910) - maintenance repairs have been made by VDOT. Property owners have requested road be resurfaced. Could be funded as Incidental Construction item. 3. Poor Mountain Road (Route 612) - road is narrow, narrow shoulders, poor alignment both vertical and horizontal for a length of approximately 1 1/2 miles. Estimated cost in range of $ 2-3 million. 4. Cox Hopkins Road (Route 915) - is an unpaved road and previous traffic counts of less than 50 vehicles per day (vpd). Recent traffic count was 76 (vpd) therefore road qualifies for Unpaved Road Funds. Estimated cost - $50,000. 5. Knowles Drive (1667) - previous flooding of one basement due to backup at entrance of 48" culvert. VDOT proposed replacement with double 6'x 4' box culvert. Estimated cost -$125,000. 6. Newport Road (Route 624) - rutting and rough condition of roadway. Could be funded as Incidental Construction item for pavement overlay. Same maintenance was completed by VDOT this past year. 7. Plain View Avenue (Route 1476) - There is no cul-de-sac or "T" turnaround at end of street, therefore public vehicles and other traffic must either turnaround in private driveways or back the length of the street. Estimate cost - $25,000. 8- Keefer Road (Route 917) - road was in there fs no turnaround at end of roadPoor~OTdiha$n made significant maintenance improvements during the past year. Estimated cost - $40,000. D-1 9. Hardy Road (Route 634) - The Town of Vinton by Resolution has requested an Urban and Secondary Road Project for Hardy Road. Urban Road Funds for the project within the Town may be available in 1992-93. Estimated cost - several million dollars. 10. Morgan Conner Lane (Route 852) requested by Roanoke County Economic 11. Sterling Road (Route 663) - unsafe alignment and shoulder drop off. considered as Incidental Construction - $10,000. - road improvements Development Department. conditions due to road Guard rail could be z item. Estimated cost 12. Timberview Road (Route 1404) - the road is narrow, lacks adequate shoulder and drainage with poor alignment both vertically and horizontally. Property owners spoke at 1988 public hearing. Estimated cost - several million dollars. 13. Colonial Avenue (Route 720) - Intersection improvements at Georgetown Road (Route 1626) to address poor sight distance and inadequate road widths. Turning traffic at this intersection can bottleneck Colonial Avenue. Several other roads were discussed by staff in 1988. 14. Ridge Drive (Route 883) - realignment of a curve at a projected cost of $20,000. 15. Riverside Drive (Route 639) - reconstruction of Riverside Drive to provide a better access to the proposed Green Hill Park Equestrian Center. Park Access funds may also be available. 16. Dry Hollow Road (Route 649) - proposed reconstruction from Route 639 to the proposed Spring Hollow Reservoir at an estimated cost of $300,000. It may be possible to provide partial Park Access Funding for Dry Hollow Road. 17. Olsen Road (Route 768) - Reconstruction of road from Peters Creek Road to North Barrens Road was considered desirable for the proposed second phase of Valley Pointe Development. The estimated cost of this project is $500,000. D-2 ,. DENIED ACTION # A12390-10 ITEM NUMBER ~ ~ ~- AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER IN ROANOKE, VA MEETING DATE: January 23, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: Resolution Supporting the Designation of Property of Roanoke Rebos, Inc. as Exempt from Taxation by the General Assembly of Virginia COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ,, ~~ ~, ~ ~^ `., C o i ~ ° ., /L C i y...< ,a _ -ic., ,.-, ."~°'j~r :..t.,~ '-$rt:.:// j 4 {~'f ~ Z -- ~ f ~ '`~, j. t" _ ~ Y f ~ J l~ ~ ~c ~~`t jx'~ L ~ ~A~ i~ Y ve.. ~. /. 1 , . --~~,~ ~ ~ Y ~~~ f BACKGROUND: ~~~` ~~~-'~' -~ ~ (. ~~ ~z ~: Roanoke Rebos, Inc. was organized by a group of local businessmen in 1985 to provide an alcohol free environment for recovering alcoholics through THE REBOS (Sober) CLUB. In 1986, the organization was chartered by the State Corporation Commission as a non-stock corporation, and it has subsequently been granted tax exempt status by the Internal Revenue Service under Section 501(c)(3). Roanoke Rebos, Inc. owns a large, old house (the former Steele residence) located at 4231 Garst Mill Road in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District and adjoining the County's Garst Mill Park. This house is used both as the location for approximately 10 Alcoholics Anonymous meetings a week and as a meetin club where recovering alcoholics can meet and socialize pwithout alcohol. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Roanoke Rebos, Inc has requested the introduction of legislation which would exempt its real estate at 4231 Garst Mill Road and any personal property owned from taxation by Roanoke County. As a pre-condition to consideration of such legislation by the appropriate committee(s) of the General Assembly, Section 30-19.04 of the Code of Virginia requires the Board of Supervisors to adopt a resolution either su exemption. This statute re Pporting or opposing this requested following questions (The answers have beenaprovided by Mr r John Turner, Treasurer of Roanoke Rebos, Inc.) 1• Whether the organization is exempt from taxation pursuant to Section 501(c) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954? "Yes" 2. Whether a current annual serving alcoholic beverages haslbeenlissuedebygthelAlcoholic ! ~~ -~' Beverage Control Board to such organization, for use on such property? "No" 3. Whether any director or officer of the organization is paid compensation in excess of a reasonable allowance for salaries or other compensation for personal services which such director or officer actually renders? "No. All officers and directors volunteer their services without compensation." 4• Whether any part of the net earning of such organization inures to the benefit of any individual. "No" And whether any significant portion of the service provided by such organization is generated by funds received from donations, contributions, or local, state, or federal grants. "Yes" 5• Whether the organization provides services for the common good of the public. "Yes" 6. Whether a substantial part of the activities of the organization involves carrying on propaganda, or otherwise attempting to influence legislation and whether the organization participates in, or intervenes in, any political campaign on behalf of any candidate for public office. "No" 7' No rule, regulation, policy, or practice of the conviction~nrace sccolor atsex or nation basis of~~ religious al origin. Correct" 8• Any other criteria, facts and circumstances which the Board of Supervisors deems pertinent to the adoption of such resolution. Roanoke Rebos, Inc. has an annual budget of a $30,000 which is funded primarily through fees from itsrsponsored AA meetings on the premises, dues for The Rebos Club and other fund raising activities such as an annual tent sale. include a $10,440 yearly mortgage payment to Signet Bank onptheir house as well as utilities and maintenance and $3,600 a year paid to the on-premises caretaker. The real estate taxes for this property for 1989 was $924.60 on an assessed value of $80,400.00 ALTERNATIVES AND IMPACTS: Approval of this request for exemption from real and property taxation will cost the County approximatel Personal revenue over the next 10 years. As an alternative the B and can indicate that it does not support the re corporation for tax exempt status. quest of this non-profit corporation which owns real estate in Roanoke eCountyn has been granted such status. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The staff recommends approval of this request and adoption of this resolution. Respectfully submitted, ~, - o Ph B. Obenshain, Esq. enior Assistant County Attorney Action Vote Approved ( ) Motion by T,PP R_ Fd t~ No Yes Abs Denied (X ) --d~' Eddy eGC~lt~tinn nPn;o,a h~ Johnson Received ( ) ~_ 2 ,,,+A Referred McGraw to Nickens -'- Robers cc: File Paul Mahoney, County Attorney John Willey, Director, Real Estate Assessment R• Wayne Compton, Commissioner of Revenue l 9'r~-~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, ON TUESDAY JANUARY 23, 1990 RESOLUTION SUPPORTING THE DESIGNATION OF PROPERTY OF ROANOKE REBOS, INC. AS EXEMPT FROM TAXATION BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF VIRGINIA WHEREAS, Roanoke Rebos, Inc. is a non-profit corporation which provides meeting space for approximately 500 Alcoholics Anonymous (AA) meetings per year and personnel support for recovering alcoholics in the Roanoke Valley; and WHEREAS, Roanoke Rebos, Inc. owns real estate located in the Windsor Hills district of Roanoke County which is occupied by a full time resident manager and which is used as the site for its sponsored AA meetings; and WHEREAS, the real and personal property used exclusively for charitable and benevolent purposes by a qualifying organization shall be exempt from taxation as authorized by Article X, Section 6(a)(6) of the Constitution of Virginia, pursuant to Section 58.1- 3650 of the Code of Virginia, upon action by the General Assembly of Virginia and for so long as such organization is operated not for profit and the property so exempt is used in accordance with the purpose for which the organization is classified; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia has considered the following factors before the adoption of this resolution in support of the tax exempt status of Roanoke Rebos, Inc. as follows: 1• That Roanoke Rebos, Inc. is exempt from federal income taxation pursuant of Section 501(c) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986; and ~~ --~ 2• That no current annual alcoholic beverage license for serving alcoholic beverages has been issued by the Virginia Alcoholic Beverage Control Board to Roanoke Rebos, Inc, for use on the organizations property; and 3• That no director or officer of Roanoke Rebos, Inc. is paid any compensation for service in such position with the organization; and 4• That no part of the net earnings of Roanoke Rebos inures to the benefit of any individual. All of the income or assets to fund the services provided by Roanoke Rebos, Inc. is generated by funds received from donations or contributions; and 5• Roanoke Rebos, Inc. provides services for the common good of the public in the form of providing physical locations for meetings of Alcoholics Anonymous and personnel support for recovering alcoholics in the Roanoke Valley; and 6• No part of the activities of Roanoke Rebos, Inc. involves carrying on propaganda or otherwise attempting to influence legislation. Roanoke Rebos, Inc. does not participate in or intervene in any political campaign on behalf of any candidate for public office; and 7• Roanoke Rebos, Inc. has no rule, regulation, policy, or practice which discriminates on the basis of religious conviction, race, sex or national origin; and 8• There are no other criteria, facts or circumstances which this Board of Supervisors deems pertinent to the adoption of this resolution. WHEREAS, a public hearing on this proposed resolution was held ~~ on January 23, 1990, five (5) days after publication of notice of such public hearing in the Roanoke Times and World News on January 19, 1990. THEREFORE, be it resolved by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County as follows: 1. That this Board supports the request of Roanoke Rebos, Inc. for exemption from taxation of its real and personal property pursuant to Article X, Section 6(a)(6) of the Constitution of Virginia and the provision of Chapter 36 of Title 58.1 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended. 2. That the County Administrator is directed to forward a certified copy of this resolution to the members of the General Assembly representing the County of Roanoke and other political jurisdictions within the Roanoke Valley with the request that the proper legislation be introduced in the General Assembly to achieve the purposes of this resolution. 3. The effective date of this resolution shall be January 23, 1990. i ~_ ;,:r r~_~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER TUESDAY, JANUARY 23, 1990 RESOLUTION 12390-11 AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE AND SALE OF THE COUNTY OF ROANORE, VIRGINIA REVENUE ANTICIPATION NOTES, SERIES 1990 IN THE AMOUNT OF $9,000,000 AND SETTING FORTH THE FORM AND DETAILS THEREOF WHEREAS, Section 15.1-545 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended, authorizes the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia ("Board") to borrow money for the purpose of meeting casual deficits in the revenue of the County of Roanoke, Virginia ("County"); and WHEREAS, the Board has determined that it is necessary and expedient to borrow $9,000,000 on behalf of the County and to issue its Revenue Anticipation Notes, Series 1990 therefor ("Notes") to meet casual cash flow deficits of the County; and WHEREAS, the County has heretofore held a public hearing on the issuance of the Notes in accordance with the requirements of Section 15.1-171.1 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended, and the County desires to specify the form and details of the Notes and to award the Notes to the bidder whose proposal results in the lowest interest cost to the County. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia: 1. The Board of the County hereby determines that it is advisable to contract a debt and to issue and sell the Notes in a aggregate principal amount of $9,000,000. The issuance and sale of the Notes are hereby authorized. The proceeds from the issuance and sale of the Notes shall be used to meet casual cash flow deficits of the County. 2. The Notes shall be issued in fully registered form, without coupons, in substantially the form attached hereto as Exhibit A. The Notes shall be dated as of the date of their issuance and delivery, shall be issued in denominations of not less than $100,000 each or whole multiples of $5,000 in excess of $100,000, shall be numbered N-1 and upward, sequentially, shall bear interest at a rate such that the true interest cost of the Notes does not exceed 9.00% per annum, such rate to be established by the County Administrator, payable at maturity, and shall mature on June 15, 1990. The County Administrator shall accept the bid for the purchase of the Notes which results in the lowest interest cost to the County in accordance with the County's notice of sale or request for proposals, provided that such interest cost shall not exceed the maximum set forth above. The Notes shall not be subject to payment or redemption before maturity. 3. The County Administrator and Treasurer of the County are hereby authorized and directed to execute the Notes, and the County Administrator is hereby authorized to affix or imprint the seal of the County on the Notes. The form of execution, imprinting of the seal and attestation may be by facsimile; provided, however, if the signatures of the County Administrator and Treasurer are both by facsimile, the Notes shall not be valid until authenticated by the manual signature of the Paying Agent. In case any officer whose signature or a facsimile of whose signature shall appear on any Note shall cease to be such officer before the delivery of the Notes, such signature or such facsimile shall nevertheless be valid and sufficient for all purposes the same as if he or she had remained in office until such delivery. Any Note may bear the facsimile signature of or may be signed by such persons as at the actual time of its execution are the proper officers to sign such Note although at the date of delivery of such Note such persons may not have been such officers. Upon receipt of payment therefor, the Treasurer of the County or such agent as may be designated, shall issue and deliver the Notes to the purchaser or purchasers thereof . The officers and agents of the County are further authorized and directed to do all acts required by the Notes and by this Resolution for the full, punctual and complete performance of all things necessary for this borrowing. 4. Crestar Bank, Richmond, Virginia is appointed as Paying Agent and Registrar for the Notes. The principal of and interest on the Notes shall be payable in lawful money of the United States upon surrender of the Notes on the maturity date at the principal corporate trust office of the Paying Agent in Richmond, Virginia. -2- 5. Upon surrender for transfer or exchange of any Note at the principal office of the Note Registrar, the County shall execute and deliver and the Note Registrar shall authenticate in the name of the transferee or transferees a new Note or Notes of any authorized denomination in an aggregate principal amount equal to the Note surrendered and of the same form and maturity and bearing interest at the same rate as the Note surrendered, subject in each case to such reasonable regulations as the County and the Note Registrar may prescribe. All Notes presented for transfer or exchange shall be accompanied by a written instrument or instruments of transfer or authorization for exchange, in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to the County and the Note Registrar, duly executed by the registered owner or by his or her duly authorized attorney-in-fact or legal representative. No Note may be registered to bearer. New Notes delivered upon any transfer or exchange shall be valid obligations of the County, evidencing the same debt as the Notes surrendered, shall be secured by this Resolution and entitled to all of the security and benefits hereof to the same extent as the Notes surrendered. 6. No charge shall be made for any exchange or transfer of Notes, but the County may require by the holder of any Note of a sum sufficient to cover any tax or other governmental charge which may be imposed with respect to the transfer or exchange of such Note. 7. The Board agrees on behalf of the County that the proceeds from the issuance and sale of the Notes will be invested and expended as set forth in the Non-Arbitrage Certificate and Tax Covenants of the County to be delivered at the time of the issuance and delivery of the Notes and that the County will comply with such covenants as may be necessary in order to comply with the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended ("Code") including the provisions of Section 148 of the Code and applicable regulations relating to "arbitrage bonds," and with the other covenants and representations contained therein. Further, -3- the County shall comply with the reporting requirements of Section 149(e) of the Code. 8. The officers and agents of the County are hereby authorized and directed to prepare, execute and deliver an appropriate official statement, notice of sale, request for proposals or such other disclosure documents as may be necessary to expedite the sale of the Notes. The official statement, notice of sale or other disclosure documents shall be published in such publications and distributed in such manner and at such times as the appropriate officers or agents of the County shall determine. 9. The officers and agents of the County are authorized and directed to take such further action as may be necessary or convenient in connection with the issuance, sale and delivery of the Notes and all actions previously taken by such officers and agents in connection therewith are ratified and confirmed. 10. The appropriate officers and agents of the County are authorized and directed to immediately cause a certified copy of this Resolution, setting forth the form and details of the Notes, to be filed with the Circuit Court of the County pursuant to Sections 15.1-199 and 15.1-212 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended. 11. This Resolution shall take effect immediately. On motion of Supervisor Nickens, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Mary H. A le , Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance Reta Busher, Director, Management & Budget Don Myers, Assistant County Administrator Alfred C. Anderson, Treasurer Paul Mahoney, County Attorney -4- ACTION # ITEM NUMBER / ~~ - / Ca AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: January 23, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: Public Hearing for Citizen Comment on Authorization for the Treasurer to Issue Up to $9 Million Dollars Revenue Anticipation Notes for Cash Flow Purposes and Adoption of a Resolution Approving this Borrowing. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~' s BACKGROUND: The County experiences revenue peaks around the end of May and the first of December, based upon the due dates that have been established for the real estate and personal property taxes. Expenditure levels for County operations, on the other hand, are fairly consistent throughout the year. Because of this timing variance, the County typically needs to borrow money for cash flow purposes in February of each year. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The County will need to borrow $ 9 million in February of 1990 in anticipation of tax revenues. Before adopting a resolution authorizing the Treasurer to proceed with the loan process, the Board of Supervisors must first hold a public hearing on the matter. If the Board approves this request, staff will continue working with the financial advisor (Wheat First Securities) and bond counsel (McQuire, Woods, Battle & Boothe) to receive bids for this short term borrowing and the County Administrator will accept the bid for the purchase of the notes which results in the lowest interest cost to the County. FISCAL IMPACT: Money has been included in the 1989-90 budget to cover the net interest cost of this borrowing. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the following: Proceed with the public hearing for citizen comment on $9 million temporary borrowing. ~~~~~~ 2. Approve the attached resolution authorizing the issuance and sale of revenue anticipation notes in the amount of $9 million. ~J ,d1y'z2.. vV . i(.Y~C•fC~ Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance r d C. Anderson 't'reasurer Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To Motion by: Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ACTION Eddy Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers VOTE No Yes Abs / ~=~--~~ RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE AND SALE OF THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA REVENUE ANTICIPATION NOTES, SERIES 1990 IN THE AMOUNT OF $9,000,000 AND SETTING FORTH THE FORM AND DETAILS THEREOF WHEREAS, Section 15.1-545 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended, authorizes the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia ("Board") to borrow money for the purpose of meeting casual deficits in the revenue of the County of Roanoke, Virginia ("County"); and WHEREAS, the Board has determined that it is necessary and expedient to borrow $9,000,000 on behalf of the County and to issue its Revenue Anticipation Notes, Series 1990 therefor ("Notes") to meet casual cash flow deficits of the County; and WHEREAS, the County has heretofore held a public hearing on the issuance of the Notes in accordance with the requirements of Section 15.1-171.1 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended, and the County desires to specify the form and details of the Notes and to award the Notes to the bidder whose proposal results in the lowest interest cost to the County. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia: 1. The Board of the County hereby determines that it is advisable to contract a debt and to issue and sell the Notes in a aggregate principal amount of $9,000,000. The issuance and sale of the Notes are hereby authorized. The proceeds from the issuance and sale of the Notes shall be used to meet casual cash flow deficits of the County. 2. The Notes shall be issued in fully registered form, without coupons, in substantially the form attached hereto as Exhibit A. The Notes shall be dated as of the date of their issuance and delivery, shall be issued in denominations of not less than $100,000 each or whole multiples of $5,000 in excess of $100,000, shall be numbered N-1 and upward, sequentially, shall bear interest at a rate such that the true interest cost of the Notes does not exceed 9.00% per annum, such rate to be established by the County Administrator, payable at maturity, and shall mature on June 15, 1990. The County Administrator shall accept the bid for the purchase of the Notes which results in the lowest interest cost to the County in accordance with the County's notice of sale or request for proposals, provided that such interest cost shall not exceed the maximum /~~-~~ set forth above. The Notes shall not be subject to payment or redemption before maturity. 3. The County Administrator and Treasurer of the County are hereby authorized and directed to execute the Notes, and the County Administrator is hereby authorized to affix or imprint the seal of the County on the Notes. The form of execution, imprinting of the seal and attestation may be by facsimile; provided, however, if the signatures of the County Administrator and Treasurer are both by facsimile, the Notes shall not be valid until authenticated by the manual signature of the Paying Agent. In case any officer whose signature or a facsimile of whose signature shall appear on any Note shall cease to be such officer before the delivery of the Notes, such signature or such facsimile shall nevertheless be valid and sufficient for all purposes the same as if he or she had remained in office until such delivery. Any Note may bear the facsimile signature of or may be signed by such persons as at the actual time of its execution are the proper officers to sign such Note although at the date of delivery of such Note such persons may not have been such officers. Upon receipt of payment therefor, the Treasurer of the County or such agent as may be designated, shall issue and deliver the Notes to the purchaser or purchasers thereof. The officers and agents of the County are further authorized and directed to do all acts required by the Notes and by this Resolution for the full, punctual and complete performance of all things necessary for this borrowing. 4. Crestar Bank, Richmond, Virginia is appointed as Paying Agent and Registrar for the Notes. The principal of and interest on the Notes shall be payable in lawful money of the United States upon surrender of the Notes on the maturity date at the principal corporate trust office of the Paying Agent in Richmond, Virginia. 5. Upon surrender for transfer or exchange of any Note at the principal office of the Note Registrar, the County shall execute and deliver and the Note Registrar shall authenticate in the name of the transferee or transferees a new Note or Notes of any authorized denomination in an aggregate principal amount equal to the Note surrendered and of the same form and maturity and bearing interest at the same rate as the Note surrendered, subject in each case to such reasonable regulations as the County and the Note Registrar may prescribe. All Notes presented for transfer or exchange shall be -2- ~~ `~~' ~`` accompanied by a written instrument or instruments of transfer or authorization for exchange, in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to the County and the Note Registrar, duly executed by the registered owner or by his or her duly authorized attorney-in-fact or legal representative. No Note may be registered to bearer. New Notes delivered upon any transfer or exchange shall be valid obligations of the County, evidencing the same debt as the Notes surrendered, shall be secured by this Resolution and entitled to all of the security and benefits hereof to the same extent as the Notes surrendered. 6. No charge shall be made for any exchange or transfer of Notes, but the County may require by the holder of any Note of a sum sufficient to cover any tax or other governmental charge which may be imposed with respect to the transfer or exchange of such Note. 7. The Board agrees on behalf of the County that the proceeds from the issuance and sale of the Notes will be invested and expended as set forth in the Non- Arbitrage Certificate and Tax Covenants of the County to be delivered at the time of the issuance and delivery of the Notes and that the County will comply with such covenants as may be necessary in order to comply with the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended ("Code") including the provisions of Section 148 of the Code and applicable regulations relating to "arbitrage bonds," and with the other covenants and representations contained therein. Further, the County shall comply with the reporting requirements of Section 149(e) of the Code. 8. The officers and agents of the County are hereby authorized and directed to prepare, execute and deliver an appropriate official statement, notice of sale, request for proposals or such other disclosure documents as may be necessary to expedite the sale of the Notes. The official statement, notice of sale or other disclosure documents shall be published in such publications and distributed in such manner and at such times as the appropriate officers or agents of the County shall determine. 9. The officers and agents of the County are authorized and directed to take such further action as may be necessary or convenient in connection with the issuance, sale and delivery of the Notes and all actions previously taken by such officers and agents in connection therewith are ratified and confirmed. -3- 10. The appropriate officers and agents of the County are authorized and directed to immediately cause a certified copy of this Resolution, setting forth the form and details of the Notes, to be filed with the Circuit Court of the County pursuant to Sections 15.1-199 and 15.1-212 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended. 11. This Resolution shall take effect immediately. -4- ~ ~~ EXHIBIT A No. N- UNITED STATES OF AMERICA COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA REVENUE ANTICIPATION NOTE SERIES 1990 MATURITY DATE June 15, 1990 REGISTERED OWNER PRINCIPAL AMOUNT The COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA (the "County"), for value received, acknowledges itself indebted and promises to pay to the registered owner of this Note, or legal representative, the principal amount stated above upon presentation and surrender of this Note on June 15, 1990, together with interest thereon at the rate of percent ( ~) per annum payable at maturity. Both the principal of and interest on this Note are payable in lawful money of the United States of America upon presentation and surrender of this Note at the principal corporate trust office of Crestar Bank, Richmond, Virginia. This Note is one of a series of $9,000,000 Revenue Anticipation Notes of the County ("Notes") authorized by the Board of Supervisors of the County by a resolution adopted on January 23, 1990 (the "Resolution"), pursuant to the Charter of the County and the Constitution and laws of the Commonwealth of S INTEREST RATE ~.~. Virginia, and particularly Section 15.1-545 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended. This Note is issued for the purpose of meeting casual deficits in the revenue of the County and creating a debt in anticipation of the collection of revenue of the County. [This Note shall not be valid or obligatory for any purpose unless and until authenticated at the foot hereof by the Note Registrar.] This Note is not subject to redemption before maturity. The Notes are issuable as fully registered notes in denominations of not less than $100,000 and integral multiples of $5,000 in excess of $100,000. Any Note may be exchanged for a like aggregate principal amount of Notes of the same maturity of other authorized denominations at the principal office of the Note Registrar. This Note may be transferred only by an assignment duly executed by the registered owner hereof or such owner's attorney or legal representative in a form satisfactory to the Note Registrar. Such transfer shall be made in the registration books kept by the Note Registrar upon presentation and surrender hereof and the County shall execute, and the Note Registrar shall authenticate and deliver in exchange, a new Note or Notes having an equal aggregate principal amount, in authorized denominations, of the same form and maturity, bearing interest at the same rate, and registered in names as requested by the then registered owner hereof or such owner's attorney or legal representative. Any -2- ~~- such exchange shall be at the expense of the County, except that the Note Registrar may charge the person requesting such exchange the amount of any tax or other governmental charge required to be paid with respect thereto. The Note Registrar shall treat the registered owner as the person exclusively entitled to payment of principal and interest and the exercise of all other rights and powers of the owner. It is certified and recited that all acts, conditions and things required by the Constitution and statutes of the Commonwealth of Virginia to happen, exist issuance of this Note have due time, form and manner indebtedness evidenced by other limit prescribed by Commonwealth of Virginia. or be performed precedent to the happened, existed or been performed in as so required and that the this Note is within every debt and the Constitution and statutes of the IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia, has caused this Note to be signed by the Treasurer of the County and the Seal of the County to be affixed and attested by the County Administrator of the County and this Note to be dated February 1990. COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA (SEAL) By Treasurer, County of Roanoke, Virginia -3- 4,j".~~ Attest: By County Administrator County of Roanoke, Virginia -4- CERTIFICATE OF AUTHENTICATION The undersigned Note Registrar hereby certifies that this is one of the Notes of the County of Roanoke, Virginia described in the within-mentioned Resolution. Authentication Date: CRESTAR BANK Richmond, Virginia By Authorized Officer ~+ ASSIGNMENT FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned sells, assigns and transfers unto (PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS, INCLUDING ZIP CODE. OF ASSIGNEE) PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE: the within Note and does hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint attorney, to transfer said Note on the books kept for registration of said Note, with full power of substitution in the premises. Dated Signature Guaranteed: (NOTICE: Signature(s) must be guaranteed by a member firm of the New York Stock Exchange or a commercial bank or trust company.) Registered Owner (NOTICE: The signature above must correspond with the name of the Registered Owner as it appears on the books kept for registration of this Note in every particular, without alteration or change.) ~~'c~~~ V I R G I N I A IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA IN THE MATTER OF $9,000,000 BORROWING OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA ORDER There having been presented to the Court a certified copy of a resolution adopted by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia (the "County") on January 23, 1990 authorizing the County to borrow $9,000,000 and to issue revenue anticipation notes therefor for the purpose of meeting casual deficits in the revenue of the County. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the certified copy of such resolution which is attached to the sketch of this Order, be and the same is hereby filed as required by Sections 15.1-199 and 15.1-212 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended. Date: We ask for this: Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke County, Virginia 24018 Bonnie M. France McGuire, Woods, Battle & Boothe One James Center Richmond, Virginia 23219 Bond Counsel Judge A Copy Teste: Clerk, Circuit Court for the County of Roanoke, Virginia 1 ACTION NO. A-12390-12 ITEM NO . ` ( ~ ~ ~ ~/ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE HOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: January 23, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: Appeal of the Decision of the Zoning Administrator; Interpretation of Proffered Conditions pertaining to signage; Hop-In development located at the northeast corner of Peter's Creek and Woodhaven Dr.; Hollins Magisterial District. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ' S COMMENTS : .~~ta, ^ .t., y~ r ;~.c ~ a!"r,(~,p.-~,,. f ~ . _`` ""~ ~S () -~-C. y~r_: ~7'-~L~N-t. 1,.-l'J"U~iv -y1 ,1•~, ,"/," ~:.~Jc.t. rC-*s t'~:~ ~'~9. r..,...,.. 1-+e~J 4 a-,~..~ ~..~- ~n l ,y ~l BACKGROUND: ~~, On July 12, 1988 the Board of Supervisors approved a R-1 to B-2 conditional rezoning request at the northeast corner of Peter's Creek Rd. and Woodhaven Dr. The rezoning request was submitted on behalf of Mr. Frank Radford who wished to develop the site as a convenience store\office building complex. In approving the request, the Hoard accepted a number of voluntary proffers offered by Mr. Radford. Some of these proffers pertained to the type and size of signage that could be located on the property. These proffers are as follows: 1. The sign will be in accordance with the rendering presented to the Planning Commission and the Board of Supervisors. 2. There will be no green on the signage. 3. There will be no bunnies on the signage. 4. signage for the Hop-In Store and the donut shop will not exceed a total of sixty (60) square feet. If signage is located on a pole, the pole will not exceed twenty (20) feet in height. 5. The signage for the office building will be monument- type signage not to exceed twenty-four (24) square feet. b. There will be no free standing advertising signs on the premises. ytJ- lI a.a z The property was developed in 1989, and in October, Mr. Radfiord applied for sign permits for the convenience store portion of the site. The Zoning Administrator reviewed the proffered conditions accepted in July ofi 1988, and informed Mr. Radford that his signage plan for the property did not conform to the proffer that limited total signage for the Hop-In Store and donut shop to a total of sixty (60) square feet (Proffer # 4; above). Mr. Radford asserted that the profifer was only intended to apply to the fireestanding sign on the property, and was not intended to limit the total convenience store signage to sixty (60) feet. The Zoning Administrator issued a formal opinion to Mr. Radford on October 30, 1989, and advised him of his options should he wish to display signage on the property in excess of the proffered limits. Mr. Radford chose to appeal the Zoning Ad- ministrators interpretation ofi the proffer pursuant to Section 15.1-491.5 of the State code. ANALYSIS OF INFORMATION: Prior to issuing my October 30, 1989 decision to Mr. Radford, I reviewed the fiollowing sources ofi infiormation: 1. The Statement of Proffered Conditions submitted to the County on behalf of Mr. Radford. 2. The July 12, 1989 Final Order of the Board. 3. The minutes and transcript of the April 5, 1988 Planning Commission meeting at which Mr. Radfiord's agent presented the proffiers to the Commission. 4. A minutes ofi the July 12th, 1988 Board Meeting. 5. Audio tapes of the April 5, and July 12 meetings referenced above. None of these sources of information contradicted the language of the Board's Final Order which limited the signage to a total of sixty (60) square feet. On the basis of my review of these sources of information, I advised Mr. Radford of my decision and informed him of his options. In this application for an appeal of my decision, Mr. Radford indicates that he wishes to display signage on the property that will "not exceed limits of the sign ordinance." Based upon the approximately six hundred and fifty (650) feet of frontage of this property on Woodhaven Dr. and Peter's Creek Rd., the existing sign ordinance would permit nineteen hundred and fifty (1950) square feet ofi sign area on the property. The proposed sign ordinance, l9v- ll~ 3 to be discussed by the Hoard in February, would allow a total of approximately six-hundred and twenty-five (625) square feet ofi signage on the property, with a 200 square foot maximum per business. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends as follows: 1. That the Hoard uphold the Zoning Administrator's interpretation of the proffer, as stated in his October 30, 1989 opinion letter. Respectfully submitted, Terrance L. Harri ton Zoning Administrator Director of Planning and Zoning Action Approved (x) Motion by Harry C'_ N;~kPnc Denied ( ) motion to Lphol~ on;n~ Received ( ) administrator ; n r~rPi-ai-i nn Referred to Vote No Yes Abs Eddy x Johnson x McGraw x Nickens x Robers x cc: File Terry Harrington, Director, Planning and Zoning Arnold Covey, Director, Development & Inspections John Willey, Director, Real Estate Assessment Paul Mahoney, County Attorney fl • ~ o~ aonlvo~~ ~ ~ ti p z ~ z a 18 u5ni ~~ s~S~V~CENTENN~P~' A Btauti fu1 Bcgirtning zC~~l/v LD1IntL,J i1~ ~~tt~i1kP DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING ANp ZONING October 30, 1989 Mr. Frank Radford 3421 Shadblow Lane Roanoke, VA 24014 Dear Mr. Radford: /~~-~~~~ PLANNING COMMISSION BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS With regards to the signage-related proffers offered in 1988 as part of the R-1 to B-2 rezoning for the Hop-In Store on Peters Creek Road, I have reviewed the statement of proffered conditions, the minutes and tape of the April 5, 1988 Planning Commission meeting, and the final order of the Board of Supervisors. It is my opinion that one of the proffers offered and thereafter accepted by the Board of Supervisors limits the signage for the Hop-In and the donut store to a maximum of 60 square feet. I have found no evidence to indicate that the 60 square foot proffer either applied only to the building or only to a freestanding sign. You indicated during our conversation that you had proffer in order for the rezoning to be approved. If make application to modify the proffer at this time, Department will assist you with the filing of th application forms. Please let me know if you have any questions. Sincerely, .~ Terrance rring Director of Planning ajb cc: Ed Natt, P.O. Box 20068, Roanoke, VA 24018 I~ ~; ,~ , aul-ahoney, County Attorney to offer the you wish to the Planning e necessary P. O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 2 4018-079 8 • (703 772-2068 1 ~'~ ~l REALTORS November 29, 1989 To Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Re: Frank R. & Mary E. Radford Dear Chairman and Members: On December 13, 1988 the property located at 2210 Electric Rd. S.W. was rezoned by your Board from R-3 to B-2 to accommodate development of a new Hop-In Food Store. In presenting the list of proffers, which we have enclosed, it was the intention and understanding of the petitioner that the proffered conditions concerning signage pertained only to the square footage requirements of those signs which were to be erected on the site and did not include signs which are normally on the front of the building. Pursuant to Virginia Code Section 15.1-491.5, we ask that the Board of Supervisors further clarify that the signage proffers referred only to free standing signs on the site and not attached to the building. The same set of circumstances have taken place at the parcel rezoned at the corner of Peters Creek Road and Woodhaven Drive. We also ask that you clarify proffered sign limitations at this site as well. This parcel was rezoned July~12, 1988 from R-1 to B-2. I will be able to speak before the Board at its earliest convenience, hopefully December 19, 1989. Respectively Submitted, Frank R. Radford FRR/mer Enclosures cc: Terrance Harrington Director of Planning P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, Va. 24018-0798 Elmer Hodge County Administrator P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, Va. 24018-0798 Paul Mahoney County Attorney P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, Va. 24018-0798 2740 Franklin Road • Suite 3 • Roanoke, VA 24014 • (703) 343-5000 ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SOPERVISORS APPLICATION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL ~ ~~ ~ 1. Applicant's Name: Frank R. & Marv E. Radford Phone: 343-5000 Address: 2740 Franklin Rd. Suite 3 Roanoke, Va. Zip: 2.4014 2. Action requested (check one): / Appeal of the Zoning Administrator's decision to: Limit signage, as to prohibit adequate usage of property, acccrc]; ng fi~ the ; nto,-^.~tatier~ e€ the-~~e€€e~s Appeal of the Zoning Administrator's interpretation of Section of the Zoning Ordinance to: Appeal of the Zoning Administrator's interpretation of the Zoning Map to: 3. Date of Zoning Administrator's action being appealed: Oct. 30, 1989 4. Reasons for appeal: Intention of proffers to cover on]~ thnGP G;gns away from building and referred to as site signs. Proffer was not clearly written. 5. Location of property subject to appeal: Northeasterly corner of Peters Creek Rc3_ ~ Wnnr9havan nriui3 6. Tax Map #: 26.20-4-27 7. Magisterial District Location: Hollins 8. Attachments submitted (check completed items): (~ List of Adjacent Property Owners ~ Evidence Supporting Claim (specify) Proffer mentions a pnlP c;gn m.,+-ai si~i~ar~e e•€ smote and building front will not exceed limits of i n orddinance. ~ Filing Fee of $75 made payable to County o~ ~oanoke 9. Date of Application: 1?/14,89 10. Scheduled Hearing Date: 11. Applicant's Signature: . Z ti 1 ACTION NO. A-12390-13 ITEM NO . ~ ! U' ~~ `j' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: January 23, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: Appeal of the Decision of the Zoning Administrator; Interpretation of Proffered Conditions pertaining to signage; Hop-In development located at the northeast corner ofi Glen Heather Dr, and Route 419 in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ' S COMMENTS - ~%~ y:~,t:,.~:~ -~ -~~/'f~~'~~ ~ ~'~~~~ t!~ ~ .:t,: q.,,,,,-,. BACKGROUND- On December 13, 1988 the Hoard of Supervisors approved a R-3 to B-2 conditional rezoning request at the northeast corner of Glen Heather Dr. and Route 419. The rezoning request was submitted on behalf of Mr. Frank Radford who wished to develop the site as a convenience store. In approving the request, the Board accepted a number of voluntary proffers offered by Mr. Radfiord. One of these proffers pertained to the type and size of signage that could be located on the property. This proffier is as follows: 1. The signage not to exceed 30 square fleet nor shall there be any green bunnies on the signage. No billboards, portable, or temporary signs will be permitted. The property was developed in 1989, and in October, Mr. Radfiord inquired about sign permits for the convenience store. The Zoning Administrator reviewed the proffered conditions accepted in December of 1988, and informed Mr. Radford that his intended signage plan for the property did not conform to the proffer that limited total signage for the convenience store to a total of thirty (30) square feet. Mr. Radford asserted that the proffer was only intended to apply to the f reestanding sign on the property, and was not intended to limit the total convenience store signage to thirty (30) feet. The Zoning Administrator issued a formal opinion to Mr. Radford on December 20, 1989, and advised him of his options should he wish to display signage on the property in excess of the proffered limits. Mr. Radford chose to appeal the Zoning i - x a F 2 Administrators interpretation of the profifer pursuant to Section 15.1-491.5 ofi the State code. ANALYSIS OF INFORMATION: Prior to issuing my December ZO, 1999 decision to Mr. Radford, I reviewed the following sources of information: 1. The Statement of Proffered Conditions submitted to the County on behalf of Mr. Radford. Z. The December 13, 1999 Final Order ofi the Board. 3. The minutes and transcript of the December b, 1999 Planning Commission meeting at which Mr. Radford"s agent presented the proffers to the Commission. 4. The minutes of the December 13, 1989 Board Meeting. 5. Audio tapes of the December 6, and December 13, meetings referenced above. None of these sources of information contradicted the language of the Board's Final Order which limited the signage to a total of thirty (30) square feet. On the basis of my review of these sources of information, I advised Mr. Radford of my decision and informed him ofi his options. In this application for an appeal ofi my decision, Mr. Radford indicates that he wishes to display signage on the property that will "not exceed limits ofi the sign ordinance." Based upon the approximately three hundred and sixty-five (365) feet of firontage ofi this property on Glen Heather Dr. and Route 419, the existing sign ordinance would allow the convenience store one thousand ninety-five (1095) square feet of sign area. The proposed sign ordinance, to be discussed by the Board in February, would allow a total of approximately three hundred and ten {310) square feet of sign area on the convenience store property, with a 200 square foot maximum per business. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends as follows: 1. That the Board uphold the Zoning Administrator's interpretation of the profifer as stated in his December 20, 1989 opinion letter . ~:~ ~ 4 , ~. 3 Respectfully submitted, Terrance Harrington Zoning dminis rator Director of Planning and Zoning Approved Denied Received Referred to Action tx) Motion by Lee B. Eddy motion teddy x ~ )uphold zoning administrator Johnson x )interpretation McGraw x Nickens x Robers x Vote No Yes Abs cc: File Terry Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning Arnold Covey, Director, Development & Inspections John Willey, Director, Real Estate Assessment Paul Mahoney, County Attorney ~ P ANC F i ~ 9 ~_ a 18 ~% ~~ S~s~V~CENTENN~P~ A Btauti/u1 Beginnixg C~uunt~ of ~nttnuke DEPARTtEIVT OF Pl.4NNING AND ZONING i~ ~... ., ~ _ ---• _~1j ~~- y _ .°--------rte- __, . PLANNING COMMISSION BOARD OF 20NING APPEALS December 20, 1989 Mr. Frank Radfiord 3421 Shadblow Ln. Roanoke VA 24014 Dear Mr. Radfiord: This letter is to con#irm our previous conversations regarding the signage proffers that apply to the Hop-In development at the northeast corner of Glen Heather Dr. and Route 419. I have reviewed the statement of proffer conditions, the minutes and tape of the December b, 19@B Planning Commission meeting and the Final Order of the Board of Supervisors dated December 13, 19HB. It is my opinion that one of the proffers offered, and thereaf ter accepted by the Board, limits the signage at this property to a maximum of 30 square feet. I have found no evidence in the information I reviewed to indicate that this 30 foot (imitation was to apply only to a fireestanding sign or only to signage on the building. As we have discussed, you have the right to appeal to the Hoard of Supervisors my interpretation of this proffer, or you may petition that the profifier be modified_ Please let me know if you have any questions. Sincerely, ~~ ,/V Terrance L. Harri ton Director of Planning cc: Paul Mahoney P. O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 2 4018-07 9 8 <703) 772.2068 ~aa~' ~ ~o 1. Roanoke, Va. Zip: 24014 2. Action requested (check one): __/ _ Appeal of the Zoning Administrator's decision to: Limit signage, as to prohibit adequate usage of property, accordincr to the inter; rP'faf i r-.., of the ~rnffcrc Ti ~i ~' ~ ~~~ ~~~~ I ROANORS COUNTY OEC ~Q ]~~ BOARD OF SOPERVISORS ~ ;~~ ~~ APPLICATION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE APP j ~~~, i~~~~ ~ ~~~wt,~ MMM4~~ ~!~?T Applicant's Name: Frank R. & Marv E. Radford ''Phone: 343-5000 Address: 2740 Franklin Rd. Suite 3 Appeal of the Zoning Administrator's interpretation of Section of the Zoning Ordinance to: Appeal of the Zoning Administrator's interpretation of the Zoning Map to: 3. Date of Zoning Administrator's action being appealed: Oct. 30, 1989 4. Reasons for appeal : Intention of nrnffar~ }~ r-nc,Ar rull~t~~s2 s' ~^ ,.., s away from building and referred to a ; P ~;qn~ rc,ffPr .ate not clear y written. 5. Location of property subject to appeal: Northeast corner of Glen Heather Drive and Rou a 419 6. Tax Map #: 76.07-02-52 7. Magisterial District Location: Windsor H'11G 8. Attachments submitted (check completed items): / List of Adjacent Property Owners / Evidence Supporting Claim (specify) Total signage of site and b ii 1 d; ng front w; 1 1 not Psrr~aar9 limits of sign ordinance. Filing Fee of $75 made payable to County of Roanoke 9. Date of Application: 12/14/89 10. Scheduled Hearing Date: 11. Applicant's Signature: . ~ , November 29, 1989 REALTORS To Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Re: Frank R. & Mary E. Radford Dear Chairman and Members: C~~'~~~ -;, ,;~~ ., . .. , ; , On December 13, 1988 the property located at 2210 Electric Rd. S.W. was rezoned by your Board from R-3 to B-2 to accommodate development of a new Hop-In Food Store. In presenting the list of proffers, which we have enclosed, it was the intention and understanding of the petitioner that the proffered conditions concerning signage pertained only to the square footage requirements of those signs which were to be erected on the site and did not include signs which are normally on the front of the building. Pursuant to Virginia Code Section 15.1-491.5, we ask that the Board of Supervisors further clarify that the signage proffers referred only to free standing signs~on the site and not attached to the building. The same set of circumstances have taken place at the parcel rezoned at the corner of Peters Creek Road and Woodhaven Drive. We also ask that you clarify proffered sign_ limitations at this site as well. This parcel was rezoned July 12, 1988 from R-1 to B-2. I will be able to speak before the Board at its earliest convenience, hopefully December 19, 1989. Respectively Submitted, Frank R. Radford FRR/mer Enclosures cc: Terrance Harrington Director of Planning P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, Va. 24018-0798 Elmer Hodge County Administrator P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, Va. 24018-0798 Paul Mahoney County Attorney P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, Va. 24018-0798 2740 Franklin Road • Suite 3 • Roanoke, VA 24014 • (703) 343-5000 ~iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii~~eisi iiiiiiiiiiiiiii iiiiiiiiiii~iiiiiiuiiiiiiiii~ _ . ~ ~: . .~~~~~, _ . _ ~~ . APPEARANCE RE UEST _ Q AGENDA ITEM NO. S _ SUB JECT ~.~~r ~ ~~ ~~~NS - ~xL~Y 1-~1.~-S . I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to = recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter = so that I may comment.WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, - I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE = RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW. • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment ,, = whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, _ and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. c • Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Ques- Lions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. __ • All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized c __ speaker and audience members is not allowed. _ _ • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. _ • Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments c with the clerk. __ ~- INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED _= GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION c FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. _ c _ PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO DEPUTY CLERK - _- NAME o ~.., `"- _ ADDRESS ~~~ ~` ~JM ~.-~ ~~ ~ ~, PHONE ~~ 3~--~~~'Z__ m~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~m of POAN0,1-F ti 9 J z a ~a . E~) 88 SESC UICENTENN~P A Btauti~ulBtginninR COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE nu AMEII1LACttr ~ ''I f'~ ~~~ ~~ 1979 1989 ~~~~~~ ~ January 26, 1990 Dr. Fred P. Roessel, Jr. Executive Director MHS of Roanoke Valley 920 South Jefferson Street Roanoke, VA 24016-4494 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS RICHARD W• BORERS. CHAIRMAN UVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT STEVEN a G~~ MAGISTER~OISTRICT LEE B. EDDY WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON FpLLJNS MAGLSTERIAL DISTR~ HARRY C. NIQCENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT Dear Dr. Roessel: This is to advise that at their meeting on Tuesday, January 23, 1990, the Board of SupervisoTurnereas uann t largetmemberlof the appointment of Rev. Clay H Services Mental Health Services of the Roanoke Valley Community Board. On behalf of the supervisors and the citizens of RoanokreC°ation please convey to Rev. Turner our sincereoi tme stand app for his willingness to accept this reapp Sincerely, ~- Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors MHA/bjh Chairman, MHS of the Roanoke Valley cc: Daniel E. Karnes, Rev. Clay H. Turner W. Robert Herbert, Roanoke City Manager Randolph M. Smith, Salem City Manager John B. Williamson, Botetourt County Administrator George W. Nester, Vinton Town Manager Jeffrey D. Johnson, Craig County Administrator P.O. BOX 296 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24018-0798 (708) 772-2004 O~ ROAN 'rF ~ A 2 °.~ a 18 E~ 88 gFS~U1CENTENN~P~ A Bcauti~ulBcginning COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE ~ALtrifl~ Df ~IIMriII~tP Dr. Norma Jean Peters Roanoke County Schools 526 College Avenue Salem, VA 24153 Dear Dr. Peters: January 25, 1990 AI LAMERIG Cliff I'If'I 1979 1989 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS RICHARD W. ROBERS. CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT STEVEN A. MCGRAW. VICE-CHAIRMAN CATAWBA MAGISTERUIL OISTRiCT LEE B. EDDY WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON FIOLLJNS MAGISTERAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT The Board of Supervisors have asked me to express on their behalf their sincere appreciation for your previous service to the Library Board. Citizens so responsive to the needs of their community and willing to give of themselves and their time are indeed all too scarce. This is to advise that at their meeting held on Tuesday, January 23, 1990, the Board of Supervisors voted unanimously to reappoint you as a member of the Library Board for a four-year term. Your term will expire on December 31, 1993. State law provides that any person elected, re-elected, or appointed to any body be furnished a copy of the Freedom of Information Act; your 1989 copy is enclosed. We are also sending you a copy of the 1989 Conflict of Interest Act. It is necessary that you take an oath of office before the Clerk of the Roanoke County Circuit Court. This oath must be administered rior to your participation on this Committee. Please phone Mrs. Elizabeth W. Stokes, Clerk, at 387-6208, as soon as possible and arrange to have the oath administered. On behalf of the Supervisors and the citizens of Roanoke County, please accept our sincere thanks and appreciation for your willingness to accept this appointment. Sincerely, Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors MHA/bjh Enclosures cc: Mrs. Elizabeth Stokes Mr. George Garretson, Director, Libraries P.O. BOX 29800 • ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24018-0798 • <703) 772-2004 ~ ppAN ~, O ti A z ~A{ ~/~ //ado 18 [ M $$ B~gQVICENTENN~P~ A Bwuti~u/BcginninR COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE Mr. Henry D. Gregory 6583 Pencheck Circle Roanoke, VA 24018 Dear Mr. Gregory: January 25, 1990 ~lI~~ME111G Ctt~ '' I I' 1979 1989 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS RICHARD W. ROBERS. CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERAL DISTRICT STEVEN A. MCGRAW. VICE-CHAIRMAN CATAWdA MAGt5TERUIL OISTRKT LEE B. EDDY WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERAL DISTRKT BOB L. JOHNS N rlowNS MAGISTERALL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT This is to advise that at their meeting held on Tuesday, January 23, 1990, the Board of Supervisors voted unanimously to appoint you as a member of the Transportation and Safety Commission to serve the unexpired four-year term of Mrs. May Johnson. Your term will expire on January 1, 1992. State law provides that any person elected, re-elected, or appointed to any body be furnished a copy of the Freedom of Information Act; your 1989 copy is enclosed. We are also sending you a copy of the 1989 Conflict of Interest Act. On behalf of the Supervisors and the citizens of Roanoke County, please accept our sincere thanks and appreciation for your willingness to accept this appointment. Sincerely, Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors MHA/bjh Enclosures cc: Capt. D. Art LaPrade, Chairman Roanoke County Sheriff's Office C~nixn#~ of ~nttnukr P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24018-0798 (703) 772-2004 F ADt~IwF Z~ ~ J _ a ~a E~ as SFSQUICENTENN~P~ A Btauti~ulBtginning COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE Mr. George W. Nester Vinton Town Manager p. O. Box 338 Vinton, VA 24179 January 25, 1990 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS RICHARD W. ROBERS. CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERAL DISTRICT STEVEN A. UTAWEiA MAG 115TERICIIL DISTRICT LEE B. EDDY WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOI,LINS MAGISTEiRUL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT Dear Mr. Nester: the Attached is a copy of Ordinance No. 12390-5 authorizing the Falling Creek Water acquisition of the Bridlewood Water System, System, the Cherry Hill Water System and the transfer of the Falling Creek Water System t of hSu erv sorslnatn their s meeting lon was adopted by the Board P Tuesday, January 23, 1990. If you need further information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, bjh Attachment All •AME111CA CITY ~ 1'I I~' ~~~ ~~ 1979 1989 (~~~tn~ ~ ~. ~ Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors P.O. BOX 29800 • ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24018-0798 (703) 772-2004 MEMO - 1/8/90 Tos Supervisors, Elmer Hodge, Mary Allen Froms Lee B. Eddy Subject: Appointment to Transportation & Safety Commission A vacancy has existed on this Commission since the death of May Johnson. If there is no objection, I would like to propose that the vacancy be filled by Mr. Henry D. Gregory, 6583 Pencheck Circle, Roanoke 24018 (Windsor Hills District). Hank Gregory is a retired G.E. engineer, a solid citizen with interest in the community, and a man who would be a positive asset to the Commission. Please let me know if there is any problem with this recommendation. M E M O RAN D U M TO: Don Myers FROM: Mary Allen ~~~~~ DATE: January 12, 1990 SUBJECT: Agenda Item - January 23, 1990 Appropriation of Funds for Police Department Transition Mr. Hodge would like you to prepare a board report for the 23rd meeting requesting appropriation of funds for the January Police Department transition. You may wish to meet with him regarding how he wants this presented. ~ V ~ M E M O RAN D U M T0: Tommy Fuqua Don Myers FROM: Mary Allen ~"~"~ DATE: January 12, 1990 SUBJECT: January 23rd agenda Early Retirement Plan Police Department, Sheriff's Office, Fire & Rescue Mr. Hodge would like you to prepare a board report for ears January 23rd meeting requesting adoption of a age 50-25 y service early retirement plan for Police Department, Sheriff's Office and Fire and Rescue personnel. Attached is an article on a similar plan adopted by the City of Salem. '` b ~. ~ p ~ ~ pQ Op `~ ~ ~ n `~: p = e~.r ~ O ~i' sn ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ A co ~ ~ ~~ ~. ~ n ~ ~~~-~ ~6' ~. . ~~-~~~ ~'~ rrm moo ~ ~ °.~~ ~~~p~ o m~~~ ~~ ~~ ao ~ .. ~~.a~~ ~ ~~ SA~ ~R M IW m ~~ "~oym~ am~~ ~'C .. m «y ~ o m a . "~o~ ae~~m m~GQ~ .~ ~ m -~ ~ m ,.~ m ~~ ~ Am m o °° Lt.~p~..~ m m p-0q. ~ p p p ~' cC ~5~~~mmmb•+~~y~ m ~o ~, !C ,"~ p ~. d tt C p-~• oo m OC"""d s~pom~'C''' mtm~yy.myr~r ~-~~ ~~ . ~ -~o~~~~~~ub M• pm~y~~.'mS C.. mm ~_ !~ ~~ .,i~• mon-+~u,~v~~ ~. o m fl. ~ ti ~~~oamp y~~ °°c,m~a~~~Csi w~~e~p,~~ p°a~°o ~ o ~. ~ a~'~po°°m~~~ ~,,P~a~'Km~~w Q.~ r,o o ~m~`C mC~ w~ ~~~mR~o tno~ ~p o `C~~x~~(nO~p ~m m O o~m,p.0 O V N~ m• W v mwmKCApo9m~ 3 X o ~.~ ~ ~~~ ~~~ 3' r-t pp~.'~m.pO mm~~~ cn Q.~~m o ~'g ~ ~. ~. m "~~ m p p ~m ~• ,yro .~ ~ e O° m o,m mar m : m 'p m _~ ®M~oom i'mp' ,e..ao~Oe ~• ~~~ ~~ ~ w~ fLO~ ~~ ~~p ~<~ p O -~ ~~. >~~~ ~ °~~ .; m m m ~~ ~ n ~ .« ~ " N ~ ~ !C - d Q. 3 Am m ~ m~ o~a m o ,.jm. n °'~'o ~ m ~A .7K ~ ,,,,t rh -i m "3' m p;p ~ r~ ~. o~. °~m~Cm m o n .~+ o -+ m o ~ O ~ n ~-s m ~s ,,,_ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ x ~ m ~ ~ ~ ~. cc'zS ~ w ¢' ca p p ~ P° ~ O ~ ~ oAmo ~°~~ mm~Exoa~flap= 0 o°am~~'om~]v°~ mmm~m m~"' W m ~_~ pp PD "< <-m m ^~ "! - Q ~ .... ~ mp N~'O©~c~~ ~ ~, m ~'o °. ~ m o.~+ ono m~ ~.® ~~ .-. -- c ~. K -~ ~ ~ °~.~ °~°n_mo.~mp: m .- m ~C o~ m g' C ~3~~ ~~ ©~ m AN "e0'm'-~'s00 `" Oo a' ~+ ~O ON O O A K p'~© ~ C. ~ m ~ to ~ ~ W O m O m ~' ~ O ~m r m `~'.3 ~''3 p G Oq o ~ "'O ~ OR mx ~ mo ~mm ,arc mp~~+?~~ ._ ___- .~__ m X V /• ~J t ~. V , 1Z iI r n O n ~ o `c~mS~ ~omm~ ~~oc~~ n•*o.~~ ~~m..•c o w vc~ a mao N w W A L7 f!1 ~' .O 7'O w ~ ~w m m . m O m ~ .~.+ O O `-~ ~ O < y ~ ". r~ `.! ~'~ "'_ ,... ~a'a~~~~~ wommoo~oxnm .~E oy o o.,~..•..•tiismaa.~mmts~ G m m m m w .,...G w C •s ... m M~ •» ~ ao a .R m ~, O O 04 •s y '•'~ p O ^. ~-. r. m ~' f7 ~+ ~• y m ~ !~ O• W b r' ~ ~D 'OOP. O m pq ~ m ~ ~ Cr ~ O o <a,m m w c.~~ m ~r~n•~"':~ M ~ ~ O ] ~ ~ p.~'.m C~a' E ~wm o ~'~ ~~ "• ~ D m ti C~D ~ ~ ~ ~" O ~• c ~ O °' .,.. " ~• ., '~ O -w p' ¢. '~. "• m m .•s m O - O m -! w ~ ~ ~~• aw <~ m ~ ~ m `~ O ~-+~* G po xp; °° `.'~.~ N.rm a.O.C °~ ~ ~-° o r A~'ON`rmp,FD 's~ KO. GG ~ O W ~p~O ~OOOmOq ~ ~O-rO •-~.r0'~'r~A o K ~v, ~ °Cciv,m~ ;"~... ~g~ m c o~wo•~m~1 a.N~~cm m~ ~ ~ b~mmo~ p.o~~ya~a Imo°.w M`do:w°'~~ooEyao~ a~m~a v w w . ~+ .-• w m ~. as ti ~. ~ b •mtmOUlm.* p~ ~Oq G.OP~O' ~'y~ORO ~'~mm~"~i4~O',7»m pK ~4~mSn -~o,Q~~ av.,o'~• •, m ~~~. a a~ wm,,~,~m$c' m~' ~a 0 'O `'~~mCtr:~msm --~.wk w ~"~* p,O~~O~T.K~m~~ O Ogp.~pDC ~.o.~,o.pA °p4+~O m°~ o mom mo.m ~ m~'`"mmmmm. owmocOi ~~'~M~:~i~-~ to ~~`CO ~ Wn. ~~ O~oOC ~~~~ ~ .'o~:~Pmm~R wO~.mZ": mac. •$ Wy, p mm mOmm~* ~$~y~KaoA"..' m~aov~~o,d~+' .,mam ~+ m n 'ts ~<~~ D.•~ES eo o ~]~G~o C~ ~e o ~ o ~ ~ o w ~~ m m~ ~~°-m m O~c O ~A ~ m O ~ ~ in -c~•m ~ ~ Oq m `JO Ompomm pr.0~mp ym O ~O -~trG ~m y p p ~.`.•rl ~ ao .+ ~ O O n m ~.~+ R1 ~ O o l~sm~~.-~~m ~~m~m~m~o ~a~~ ~0~~~ +O4~~C =~+mOOmm~y°~<o O~C~~wy'd ~+`~ mn~wCOa'~`..•cDy"'pq~C R aso •~C.m~mGm'Cy~~"-~"••'rml~~ p. 4o ~O rm 0 ~ m~ ~ m m ~ r m a`r m "~ (3' ev: n ~ y y O fA ems. ~ r ~ ~ '~ O m .m m ~ r ~" OW m ~ ~+ `~ O ~ <* `~ co ooaoa'a ~w~.~cmo'~•am~`c~wm~KoK ~ ~mm.~sfl~9~mQ.o"o~'~• ~ ~'CS r+~ m `~ ~ m "a' m y O r.. O y o -! m r• ~`'.. m O W -~ W -S 'i. ~ Q~ m }m w0 `J~.~~"~O rOo':m ~¢'~e~*a~ eY:~ m~ ~,`•Y09 ~ ~ 00'~i ~', O ~ ~ ~~~w ~ ~ m~~,~9~0 ~o.w m m W p:Q.~Q,O ~W m o C ~~~°! o m•~~~m m~ G~ Mms m o,,.ymo m~~aw A::~ .+,wonoOm~*o~'~OC mo°~ o moo., ~A o.s9K...., m .r w.-•m... u,moo mKo~~'m o~om~Q.~o.so mo Kim o• e* p O m O .~ m <•. pq e. w ~' O p' `~ ..• m ~* p; r• O ~ m -s S ~. 'i O ~'! '-Y ~ r• '.~' ~" m oo m m r• . ¢. O O a+ r m e* ~ ~ 04 O fA ~,, rd ~ ~ m n "'" ~s ' O "~' m „'' ~ O `+ -~ .•n m O. r "'d O ~ w p, ~. em•. ¢. ~ e~ `"~ ~ m "~ .".•"~~ ~~~~(~~~~m -~1"`J."~"'m~O~w~' ~.~0.`.} ~¢,`r~ ~CA..CCL,4~oW Gmp~ Om C '~ O y ~ '7 Q, a+,0 ~ .er O C. e+ "~ ,~, m ~ m O r ..• '.. /9m w ~ ~ w ~ a ~ n'9 ~ z,K ~~ ~m~aoa Q.m o ¢°,a° m °_'-__ w or,,p.K o•~. `c m 9w'-'o c o•o y a m m a~ ' • "'t ~m `V o,~o.o Q,~.a ~ o ~m ' -a ~ `~ o ~; c+ O w } K~ p ~ m ~m `G O a ~ ^ O v J °~ 0 omm °O poC~agw~O~~o ~~ /''~~ ~ t/ . ° ~~~"m ~w ~`~ `~ ~ " J o ~ omw i ~~' ~ ° ~`~ v p, O ~ ~ ~ p~ R~O~ mm 4~'s~ Q O~~~K~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ O . ~ ~ - a ~ ~ RQ G Km~ ~°' o~~°' L1• C~ y M m G '~ ow ~ 9 .s w~ p, m m m o m ~m m ~. w O O wmw y mOm.00. Om ~ ~'m~ ~ ~ "w ~•. P~ ~ r ~ O.m~ ~ ~ m m ~~ °7 C. ~~ c e .C ~nm ~ m Oa 7C'~ ~• ~ Wx ~ ?~vpj ~p ~ ~~ ~~m ~ ~ p ~, f~D 00 ~. "~ O ~ P1 .~O. p v' fD "X O A ~• •a• ~ .~''r ~~jp„ %i W w m t^, .' ~r~ a .~ ~ m xg ~wW b ~G ~ ~~ ~ ~ xfD ~. ~ ~.C~p' w m O ~ ~ O O O ~ O C ~ ~ ~ N ~ O ~ ~ ~ '+ cr ,.. ~, ~ p, x x y c~ m m ^ ^ Q'~. Vi r rt w A ... ~ w ,~ O m O ¢ ~ 'LS w ~•. ~. ~ m O ~ O ~ O' w ~ O ~ (~ m ~••. p O p -t O y 0 ~•a,¢,O m p "•O k 0 O ~w m 0 0 ~+O fl.©•O O'O ~ O ~o m~ ~Q.~'w ~~`s'~ ~°•xQ,~m O 04 ~ ¢, eC w p. m fYl ~ ~ =~"~ m C O O ~ C «mapOq ~wC.. pow ~ ~O ~. ~ ~ QD ~+ ~~ ~ ~ ~ O' p• w LL ¢'0Q m Q. m ~ m O w ~C rr K ~~ o •'©~ ,,, w~ m m m `~ C m m p a0i G~~ m °i-p'~~`C ~ K ~ ~ O w m K O ,moo ~~sm~'o~om~<¢."mom aN Amwo SOm ~~moWwwm~'~COOwO~m OmOo ~ ~+ m nOC ~...- m m ¢.a, n O `~ p G G. O "~ a r+ ~~.oz "~'~~ °~acoo~m o o ..• 'YmO~e~ m o as o ~•a _ m~•w~~•w~mmw m ~ pi m ~ "'O O O ~ ~. rr7m O~ O ~OC~ a'~i O ~~ eO•~w p~000 mG~~O Q.~oO '"~ ~. .. .~ ~' aO+pf "gym - ~ .r~~.w ~~ x~ ~C3.~~ ".y ~yr(nm a •O ~ ~ ~ ~~c ~ ~~ O ~como~ ~m0~ mk ~' ~ t" GM~ O ~~ ~ d 0 O KeO.C mw O~~ O P! m ~C O n m s « .~ W nO ?+" ~7dpi°'~m~,~.to mG ~ w frtD ~~ N p p. ~ ~ ~ f1. ~ !~ O ~O".- A A ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ m ~ ~, ~ p. ~'i two O G a . ~m ~ A ~ pOp ~A G ~ OA ~ N ~,.r °~ oar ~~~ooa~~~~~e~ ~ ~ ~.oB aia ~` ~ o. eo ~ ~•p Gp ~ eo ~ ~o p. "• '. " O ~g~ ~ ~~A a ~ ~o ~ ~~ ~ "~ C ~ r `~ ~ w r Q' n ~ ~ 7 ~~"+ ¢~ rOQ ~ fnD ~ ~. _ ID ~ 'f ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ `~ ~_~ ~ %~' M..O ~wdq W ~0~~'A"_p~Li CD "~ ~are~o~~~a<~~~~~~G ~~ ~ rn ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ y O ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Painting, Decorannu ~ dead ~stal;e, Sate ~ Photography - 62 PlanoTuninp Plastering ~ 62 5. Roanoke 201 202 Plumbing and HeaTinO Radio, Television ReDalr 65 S,W, Cb)y ~ S W. County 203 204 Refinishing, UDhoistering Refrl't#eratlon,Aircond. 67 Salem ~ N, W,CIty 205 ~g Remg4eling Serv. Rooflpg and Siding 69 N.E. City 70 N, County ~ R uq Geanlnp Sewlrtp services 71 WIIIIamson Road Aree E. City and Garden CItY S 208 20C Sheet Metal Work Telephone Answ. Serv. . 72 73 Vlntan, 460 East Allegheny County 20D 209 Termite, Pest Control 74 75 Bedford County 20E Tree 8 Lawn Service Wall Coverings 76 glacksburp gotetourt County 77 210 F 2 Weather Stripping Christiansbur9 Franklin County 2 Emp oymen °~;,'q County 20G 212 Employment Agencies mentlnformatlon f 81 FIoYd County t ~ Mo 20H 201 21 Emp oy Help Wanted Wanted,Female y nTOOmerYCoun CountY ~ 20 20 SltUptlons SltualllonsWanted,Mate Redford Areas Homes For Sale 21 Finaneia - 1 Miscellaneous Far Sale 221 Lop Homes 21 BuslnessOPDOrtunities qq Open House 91 Homes withAcreaOe 21 21 Collection AOencles Lots and Small Tracts Farms, Land 8. Timber vestments, Stocks, Bonds 9 I 21 n Money to LoanuDto51500 3 94 Cabin,Sltes 2 21 Money to Loan 95 Resort Property Money to Loan, Mortgages Waterfront Property 96 21 Wanted to Borrow, Invest Smlih Mountain Lake 2 Brokers In Real Estate `n~~10n Bus. Prop. Rani, Lease 2 ondence Courses Bus. Prop. for Sale 100 sroD• l 2 on Corresp Real EstateAUCT Locallnsiruction Classes 101 sTate t l scs a lepe Tratles 5chools,COl e Esta 103 Wanted Rea Mobile Homes Farm Ella Mobile Homes, Sale-Used Sites Mobile Home Homes Parts 8 Se l rv. ~Egyjpment, Implements e 110 Mobi 111 Mobile Homes Wanted Farm Products Livestock 112 Cemetery Lots Out-of-Town Property Pastureland/Garden Spots 113 Condominiums Poultry, Chicks, SupDlles Wanted-Exchange 115 ~9erc an ise Bus./Organlzatlon Sales 118 119 Family Sales Antique Dealers 120 121 Antique Reproductions 122 Aucttons Barter, $WaPS 1Y3 124 Blcvcles Building Materials Office Equipment 125 ~~~ Bus. Bus. Office Furniture Photo Supplies s r 128 , a Ca4rl~ Ceramics, Crafts. TOYS 130 Com?uters, Supr~les ElectricalEqulPmenT 131 EgtllDment Rentals 132 13: Fige Markets Fuel: Wood, Coai OII 13< ' Good~Thinps To Eat 13 13t Household Goods JeJrelry, Diamonds, Etc. 13, ET AL fi C/O HAMPTON W. THOMAS N Pt. Lot 3, BIk. 4, Lincoln Ct. Ii BEAS~Y, THOMAS H. JR., F C O HAMPTON W. THOMAS ~ Pt. Lot 2, BIk. 4, Llncoln Ct. I 2041605 I TREVINO, CONNIE L. pt. Lot 10 Tinker View Add. 2060719 SWIFT, DAVID NEWTON Lt. 8, 8 PT. Lt. 7, BIk.31, RFSH 2111609 CARTER, JOE Pt. Lot 8, BIk. 31,RF&H 2111610 PULLIN, GARFIELD b MARY C/O ABIE PULLIN 3 E, pt. Lot 13, BIk. 48, RFSH J 2111816 K pAYNE, CHARLES & KELLIE 4 Lot 4, BIk. 4, Moorman B 2120505 5 B 8. P ENTERPRISES, INC. 6 Parcel 3, BIk. 1, Moorman 7 2121206 8 JOHNSON, DEWEY L. 9 Y0 PT. LoT d, Sec. 3, Blk. 3, Round C HIII Park nl 21ao7o6 ~ WILLIAMS, CARRIE 5. 1F C/O THOMAS O. BANKS lE Lot 12, BIk. 56, Melrose Land 24 Co. 225 2222212 246 FERGUSON, ALBERTA M. 227 C/O PEACH FERGUSON 260 Lot 14, Blk. 5, Villa Hpis. 261 2320113 263 WHITLOCK, KENNETH 264 SS Patton Ave. 450 Ft. E. O. S. 229 Jefferson 230 St. SO x 125 F. 231 3011413 MITCHELL, DORIS M. NFORD Rec. & Ql) OOrS - C/O BRENDA MU ~ E. PT. Lt. 9, Sec. N. E. 1, BIk. 7 OS Boats 8 Accessories 238 3012846 239 BEASLEY, THOMAS H., JR., Cam DSites TrallerscCamp&Travel 241 C/O HAMPTON W. THOMAS Lat 4, BIk. 31, East Gate Transpor a ion LESTER, DORIS R. 8. ODES INEZ Aviation Automobiles for Sale Racing Cars Raclnp Accessories Vans 8 4-Wheel Drives Trucks B. Tractors Construction Machinery Auto. Repairln0, Service Auto SupDlles, Parts Autos, Trucks for Hire Automobile Agencies Wanted-Automotive VIADA 242 RH 243 Lot 55, Blk. 39, East Gate 248 24C 3221074 ROANOKE HAULING b 244 245 RIGGING CO. Lt. 2, BIk. 30, East Gate 246 247 3231902 BEASLEY, THOMAS H., JR., 248 249 ET AL 250 C/O HAMPTON W. THOMAS 251 Lot 3, BIk. 30, East Gale 25B -- 3231903 BEASLEY, THOMAS H., JR., ET AL HAM C/ s HO ~ O B k Cllf 7, Sec. Hpis. ~ - - ~, Re~lt~e~pt1 ossifeedS80 ~62~3167~ TT~~an®ke Times F3 Woad-dews eT to the place of tse~irr part time. Sb ING, end being the remain- ~- iq part of Lot 7, according to CHILD GARE- le MaD of F. A. and Emma G. please ce la8 eynolds property; and, EING the same property CHRI- onveyed unto the Grantor care for you erein by Christopher Colum• soma. Full o .us Small, Jr. and Arlene R• mall, husband and wife, by EVANGEL CI ihru 12. Twc )Bed dated April 1, 1988, of Avs., S.E. 9! •ecord In the Clerk's Office of Ave„ N.E.S 'he ClrcUit Court for the City IT'S- ACHILp ~f Roanoke, Virginia. TERMS: Cash-Bidder's de- ants who C Finest In C posit Of 53,770.00 cash Or card' fled check will be required. MOTHER 6 Balance of purchase price d DeYable not child care abl a r=tes• shall be due an later than fourteen (14) days _ MOTHER OI after sale. FRANK K. SAUNDERS N.E. (660) ly. Call 36! SUBSTITUTE TRUSTEE ____--- For information contact: MFennEPo Frank K. Saunders come, flex Woods, Ropers & Hazleprove rates. 989- 105 Franklin Road, S. W P. O. Box 720 Vlrplnla 24004-0720 W IN MY M Roanoke, Telephone: (7031 982-4200 ~ (16973) Etderl~ Car TRUSTEE'S SALE OF - PROPERTV gMERIC? 5,30 ACRES, MORE OR LE55, HOMES ROCKBRIDGE COUNTY, room, o VIRGINIA nurse as In execution of a Deed of Trust L8%I~Ig1~ dated July 16, 1979, made by Forge, E Clyde H. Mull and Edna H. HIII, Mull, recorded In the Clerk's 1-app.999 Office of the Circuit Court of DOMIN Rockbridpe County, Vlrplnla, In Deed Book 380, Pepe 14, the undersigned, Jonathan M. Ropers, Substitute Trustee, will offer for sale at Public Carlnq auction at the County of Vlr- plnla, on the 9th day of Febru- ary, 1990, at 12:00 D.m., noon, LEWIS- the property described In said needs~l Deed of Trust, IyInO in the County of Rockbridpe, State LOST of Vlrplnla, and more particu- Jan. 8, lady described as follows: Lost '~ All that certain lot or parcel of 345239 land together with Improve- Mad menTs thereon, rlOhts of way 19 incident thereto and apPurte- 26 hour nances thereunto appertain- N~ Inp, containing 5.30 acres, more Or I@ss, situate and IYing profess aPDroxlmetelY two (2) miles north of Natural Bridge, front- Inp on the westerly side of U. ~~~~ S. Route #11, In BUFFALO MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT of Rockbridpe County, Virginia, IOSf, FI and being shown and desl0- noted as Tract 1-J-2 upon a made and pre- plat and survey on Dared by D. E. Brady, Survey- or, dated September 1951, and recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Rock^ p OF ROANOKE PUBLIC HEARING ClT11990!91PBUDGETTHE The Board of Supervisors of RoanoketCo offer invites citizens of Roanoke County written or oral comment for items to be includ- An i nfo mat on al fpubGc hea~ing, fto receive citizen c 23m1990 alai ~ ~~hpim ~or as soo January thereafter as may be heard, at the Roanoke County Administration Center, 3738 Brambieton Avenue, SW, Roanoke, Virginia. All interested citizens are invited to attend this meeting. (14484) B1ec ler. Are COL M E M O R A N D U M TO: Board of Supervisors FROM: Diane D. Hyatt, Director of Finance ~,; s.~~ ~~ DATE: January 8, 1990 SUBJECT: Public Hearing Scheduled for January 23, 1990 There will be an informational public hearing on Tuesday evening January 23, 1990 for citizens of Roanoke County to offer written or oral comment for items to be included in the budget for the 1990-91 fiscal year. A proposed budget calendar is attached for your information. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have questions. ~s ~~~- Qa e ~~~ ~ ~,~,~kr-~.-c, ~~ COUNTY OF ROANOKE PROPOSED BUDGET CALENDAR FY 1990-91 Date Activity November 28, 1989 - Preparation by Finance Department of budget December 13, 1989 packets for distribution to all departments. December 14, 1989 Kick-off budget meeting with all departments for review of budget procedures and distribution of budget packets. December 14, 1989 - Finalization of revenue estimates by Department December 31, 1989 of Finance. January 8, 1990 General review of programs, needs, and priorities with all Department Heads and Constitutional Officers. January 20, 1990 Board of Supervisors meet to establish FY 1990-91 budget priorities. January 2, 1990 - Preparation by the Finance Department of January 19, 1990 departmental targets. January 22, 1990 Distribution of targets to all department heads and Constitutional Officers. January 23, 1990 Public hearing to allow citizen discussion on the overall budget. February 2, 1990 Deadline for submission of departmental budgets. February 5, 1990 - Finance staff to review departmental budgets. February 23, 1990 February 13, 1990 Budget Work Session to present FY 1990-91 revenue estimates and to disclose Board priorities. February 26, 1990 - Departmental budgets to be reviewed with March 9, 1990 Department Heads, Assistant County Administrators, Constitutional Officers, and the County Administrator. Date Activi March 16, 1990 Final version of departmental budgets submitted to the Finance Department (including unfunded requests.) March 20, 1990 Budget Work Session with Board of Supervisors. Departments present their budget requests funded and unfunded. March 20, 1990 Public hearing to allow citizen discussion on real estate, personal property, machinery and tools tax rates. March 23, 1990 School Superintendent to deliver School budget to County Administrator. March 27, 1990 Joint Budget Work Session with Board of Supervisors and School Board. County Administrator to present balance County budget and Superintendent of Schools will present the School budget. April 3, 1990 Budget Work Session. April 10, 1990 Adoption of 1990-91 real estate, personal property, machinery and tools tax rates. April 10, 1990 Budget Work Session. April 24, 1990 Adoption of budget. First reading of Budget Appropriation Ordinance. May 8, 1990 Second reading of Budget Appropriation Ordinance. Adoption of Budget Appropriation Ordinance. May 25, 1990 Adopted budget printed and distributed to Department Heads. May 25, 1990 - Preparation of budget book for printing July 13, 1990 . July 16, 1990 - Budget book sent to printers. July 27, 1990 August 6, 1990 Budget book submitted to Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA). Notes: a. Schools must submit their budget by April 1, 1990. The governing body may accept by May 1, 1990, or within 30 days after receiving estimate of funds. b. A notice announcing the public hearing on a talc rate must be published seven and fourteen days prior to the date of the hearing. c. A notice announcing the public hearing for the budget must be published at least ten days prior to the hearing. d. A notice announcing the public hearing for the change in real estate assessments must be published at least seven days prior to the hearing. e. A notice of availability of the approved budget must be published no more than 30 days after the budget is approved by the Board of Supervisors. r. ~e+u electnc Rtl., SW, Roanoke, VA 21018 Roanoke, VA 21018, a.,~" (7031772-2063 x,(703) 989.'!201 (2311) , ~_. _- _ ... B. /OS Gplfol StrNt, Su1te 509, -~'P -CMrleslon, WV 25301 Department of the Tna- ;C. D20 Enferprlse Psrkway, sury/Internal Revenw Ser- Sulfa 206, Richmond, VA23291, ylce. Notice of Public Auction ' (~) ~~ •' Sale. Under the authority in Coptes ofihe Connect Docu- Internal Revenw Code set- ments, SDeclficatlons and flan 6331, the property de- Drawings may be obtained scribed below has been seized _ from fM office of CINn Wster }or nonpayment of Internal Engineers, Ina., P.O. Boz 218, nvenw texas des from Lae Finustb, VA 21090, telephone K. i Gayle N. Samwlson. The (703) 173.2122, upon making a property will be sold at Dublle deposit of f150.00. Payment atdlon as provided by Inter- shali be made fo CLEAN WA- na Rewnw Code section 6335 _ TER ENGINEERS, INC. De• and related ngulatlons. Date poalta will be fully reWnded to df Sale: February 4 1990. Time thoseblddenwM}uDmliDlds of Sale: 10:00 AM. Place o} and return tMir Dnwings S•Ic Front Steps, Roanoke =and SpeelfleattonstotheEnpl- County Courthouse, Main bee4 in good tonditlon, with- Street, Salem, Vs. Title Of- ':: h 13 days foliowing tM bid }end: Only tM rl0ht, title, and ,. openlnp. Flfly peranf of tM Intenat of Lee K. 6 Gayle N. `„deposit will M refunded to `.-non-bidden upon return of Samutlaon In and to TM prop• tM Contnd Documenfa, In arty will be offered for sale. If requested, tM Internal Rwe• good condition, to iM Engl- nw Servles will furnish infor- seer within 1S dsys following mstlon about possible encum- tM bid openln0• - brances, which msy be uuful Bidders era advised that a in datermininp the value of pre-bid conference will be the Interest being sold. De- Mld at the Iron Gste Sewage url Dtlon of Property: Apar- Treatment Plant, on Febru- cal of lend contalninp 27.2 ary 1, 1990, at 2:00 PM for the acres located on Rt. 691, 12 O'- - purpose of fsmlllarizln0 Bld- Clock Knob Rosd, Roanoke denwlththeseopeoftMprol- County, Vlrginls. Property act and to snswer any ques- currently not in use as It Is °tlons which may have arisen. undeveloped. Future use The BIDDER must comply tentlal Is for residents eon- .with the President's Execu- atrudlon purposes. ~toperty flue Order x11216 DrohibiTing more fully described as fol- discrimination in employ- lows: BEGINNINdat a stone mast regarding race, color, with Msple a d Cheatnuy ;`creed, sex or national orl0ln; ~ pointers on Iin of John Owan s ,musf comply with tM Presl- and corner t John Slrifklar dent's Executive orders and known • Corner N0.21 of x1213! and 11265 regarding Dsy Surve of 1883f thence utlllzatlon of MBE and WBE with said wen's Nne N. 71 firm; and must comply with daps. SO' . crossing s brsnch "the Civil Rights Act of 1961 end )~0 feet o e stone at No. $ E tM Davis-Bacon Act. The BID- }hence a aw Iles, N. St daps. ~ DER must certify that they do ~ E. 7 feet tp a stone at No. ~notorwllinotmalntsinorpro• a, 3 fe frorsl a pine 21 feet ,'vide for their employees soy - ; faellltles that an segregated from s atenoak; thence N. !9 an the basis of rsce, color, ` `creed or national origin dep. E 634 felt to two chest uta ~o No. 1; thence ' . Each BIDDER will be re- E. 170 crow- Nort 62 daps. 30 Ing s hollow 170 feet to s white qulred to submit with his bid, Ilea t No. S, corner to the 8 a bid bond or certified check, acr traefsold by Pitzerto Da- `, D•Yeble to TM Town of Iron ' vld ledbn; thence with ssld =Gate, In tM smount of flea (5) trs , S. Its de0s. 35' E. 564 feet i ~=:'IZF~~;' ~' 1 s`k['ss'~"' ` to stone / Mat northvwst of a cha tout oak stump on said _ s WELCOME ~• ` "~ Str~kler'sllseatNo.6;then~e wit Sfrlckler's Ilse 3.11 daps. a. ~*~ -~~~=ABOARD 30"}N. rr~~uunning partly with 1M Ctl~intylRtlad 930 feet to the , Beginning, contelnlnp 27-2/10 -.+'~ ,x-, t,= t .. - % ~' ,6:•a ,. :. acres, chore or less. Property msy. bel Inspedad at: At the alts, 3.6~mlles on Rt. 694 attar _ leaving Nlway 221 South. Psy- ' ment Te ma: Full payment re• l ~ - ~~ ~~ ~ qu red o acceptance of high- i~ Whether you're at bid. Porm of P•ymenf: All payments must be by cash, bU in Or Seilln y 9 g ~ c•rtl}led check, eashler's or ' x,; n- aboat, the place treasurer cheek or by s Unlt- .d staT.a~tla.l, Dank, ex- `e! '~. t0 W81g h anChOf ,'., Dress, or tefepraph money or- der Make heck or money th °~"" I CI f d ' ' . ~ S e aSSi le - order Dsysb to tM Internal "~ ~ section of the ~~~ ' f"f'• *' ~ R.r."°• s.^+le•• c1Yd. H. AI- l Roanoke Times ~ I aon, RevenuR OHleer. Date 1-9.90. Addrssi~ for Informs- >v..;, ~ World-News floe about fM Scale: P.O. Box . 'f` W@ Can pUt boat 1331, Rosnoke,\ Va. 21007. Phone (703) 982 -' _~ buyers in touch : -(~'~) _ ~" . 'With boat Sellers ~ ` INVITATION TO BID . $6Ven days a TM Clty of Roanoke R\deveb -" ~'i"' .~ ~ week. Place a ~ ¢~ opment and Housing Auf~ orl- uf~ ill t l d 3 l t fast-actin ad in accep sea e Drop0 s Y w e }or `wA 11-~ Mornlnpaldl. " Classlfl~nOW Manor ComDrlhenslve Mod- b yy C8111n -- ernlzatlon ProlecY', until 2:00 D.m., E.D.S.T., WWneaday, ~ 7 ~ r 981 X31 ~OP toll s ~ ` ' - February 7, 1990, at in office looted of 2626 3abm Turn• _ ;,, , ffe e ~''T ` = pike, N.W., Roanoke, VlrOlnla n nn ., ~ < vw-~7-27~ ~ 2101], and M(d until February .... « . . ~ 0, 1990 of Zr00 D•m., at which ^~ , .,_f"~ „ a...„r~ time and place all bids will be DA^~^'•^ ;- i~a)Allllllc ~nl~ -. publicly opened and read ~+~~~1 1~T,~~„, ' 1~d' ' ~ , aloud. 1 1~Cf J ,; V yY~1 ~ CoDie• of the Contrail Docu• ~.., _ •,,~n menrimaybeexaminedettM .. ..t ... :x,riR. ,. .. - - . , - ~ 4. .. t u received at the office of the City of Roanoke Redevelop- ment and Houslnp Authority, 2621 Salem Turnpike, NW, P. O. Box 6359, Roanoke, Vlrpin- `~le 21017 until 2:00 D•m. On tM stfernoon of F•Druary 22, 1990. Addltlonai Information' an be obtained by aPDlYlnp to the Authority's office or by conhctlnp John H. UrquMrt, ~, teephone (703) 983.9260. This Authority reserves tM rlgM to sleet enY and all bids and wales any Informallfles in tM I bidding Protess..,,,ta:•- I . CltyofRoanoke - _ Redevelopment end `~ ~•:Nousing Authority ~*'. ~~ Herbert D. McBride ' -'~~ Executive Director ~+« (2499!) . ~. ,.~ ~ _ „--~:--~ -INVITATION TO BID ' Bids for Automobile Insunnee, ettsdlve from March 1,199010 Msrch i, 19!1, will be received at the office of the CITY of Roanoke Redevelopment and Houslnp Authority, 2624 Salem Turnpike, NW, P. O. Box 6359, Roanoke, Virginia 21017 until 2:00 p.m. on the attsrnoon of February 22, 1990. Addlflonel Information can bs obtained by applying to the Authority's office or by eontsding John H. Urquhart, telephone (703) 'fit uthorlty re- serves the right ail any end all bids and wsive In- tormsllties In the bidding p nu. ., .. ' Redevelopment and ~~~'~" `HpusinpAuthorlty ` '~_ '~ Herbert D. McBride ~ . ~ `~~. ~" Executive Director r (25001) ~ s'.~> . `~ ""'NOTICE OF ' ~ PUBLIC HEARING ~~; r~ _- ON PROPOSED - BORROWING BY THE -•COUNTYOF ~ '" '.~ ROANOKE, VIRGINIA ""~' Notlee la hereby given that the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virplnls, ("County") will hold a public hearing In accordance with Section 15.1-171.1 of the Code of Vlrpinla of 1950, sa amend- ed, on the luuence of not to exceed >t9 million short-term notes ("Notes") for Ths Coun- ty for the purpose of meeting usual deficits in the revenue of fhb County and In sntklpe- tlon of the colleillon of taxes and other revenue o1 the County. A resolution authoriz- Inp the luuanee of the Notes will be eonsidend by tM Board of Supervisors at Its meeting on January 23,1990. A copy of such resolution Is on file In the office of the County Adminlstrator. TM Dublle hearing, which may M eontinwd or sdlourned, will be held at 7:00 o'clock p.m. on Janwry 23, 1990, Defoe tM Board of Supervisors at the Rosnoke County Adminlstra- tion Center, 3738 Bramblefon Avenw, Rwnoke Vlrpinla.. °- Elmer C. HodOe '? ':t CountyAdminlatrator ?'! NOTICE OF PUBLIC SALE Notice la hereby given tMt the following described equlp• meet will be sold at Dublle sale to the hl0hat bidder on the 26th day of January 1990 at 10:00 a.m, o'clock at Homa- dead Materials Handllnp l:a~ Roanoke VA 21017, Roanolu County. x ~" Deserlptlon o/ (iooda M be Sold: (One) 19q Melroe 143 Bobcat, S/N 5007-27227 . ~° Terms: Gsh or prtlfled funds unleu prevloua credit ar- nnpements an made. Call L. L. Schiele at 616.69/-41SS. Chase Manhattan Leaslnp Company (Michigan) Ise. re- • -.•-~. .,. v~,~wa wurR- places. -... - _ _ .,. The briefing awlli De held Thursday, Jan. 2S, from 9:30 a.m. until 12:30 p.m„ aT'tM Department of Information "Technology's Fourth Floor Audltortum, located In the Richmond Plau Building at 110 S. Seventh St» Richmond, Va. .Fn'... :' ~:`.. .. :: ..' New standards and polleles will be covered with special emphuls on tM amended Ex• pratlon Standard (1926.650) .which becomes effective Feb. fr 1990. _ ~ ; .. - " - , Employers-and emDloyer~and employee astocletlons or ~'-grtlupa are enetl UraQed }0 sand represtntetlves to the brlefln0• For addlflonal Infor- meflon contact Lllia M. WII• (lama at 801/371-8589 or M. Ew Byrd of !04/7!6.705. ~,1~;, ,,;,,, .`(16915) :; tc -_•,•. :~.: PUBLIC NOTICE _ Roanoke Emergency Medltal Services, Inc» locsted In Rosnoke, Vlrpinla proposesTo provide both advsnca Ilfe sup- port end bsslc Ilfa support emergency iranaptlrtatlOn prvlees for elderly, economi- cally disadvantsged, handl- eapped or otherwise "In need of ' Individuals for the pur- pose of emergency transport fo local srea hosDlTals. Funds ere being requested from tM Commonweslth of Virginia to replace a bodyron- ehaasis vehicle ambulance. e Invite any Interested pub- II or private transit or para- fre It within the Clty of -Roan ke to comment on the propo d service by sending a written oflce by Msrch 31, 1990 to .Marc Adelnsn, Virginia apartment of TransDOrhtl n, Rall and Pub•' Ilc Division, 1 East Broad Street, Rlch red, Vlrpinla. 23219 and to R anoke Emer-', genes Msdlcal rviees, Inc., Post Otflee~ Box • 1COl, 1, Roanoke, VIr01n 21001- ~ .• (13515) ,^-- :y't~ -~ REQUEST OR +"-~n >tr,4" STATEME OF '• ;~~ ~ QUALIFICA IONS ;'<` '~ West Piedmont PI sing Dls- trlil Commlulon 1 soliclting .Stsfemenf of Qu Ilflcaflons from gwli}led fir s to ton- dud awater and er fadll- tY study end Dlan to Franklin -County, VA Inelud p Smith Mountain Lsks. P led wltl M funded from SWC grant of EPA 2051 funds and etching funds from Frankll County. TM SOQ should be fe t to: -~ ;; Robert W. Dowd, AICP/ Executive Olr or REQUES ~ FOR PROPO~ -s ~~:AU IT SERVICES: The City Co ncii of Lexington invites i independe Certified Public Accoun submit pr osals to pertorm a fines complies audit for the fiscal year June 3 , 1990. It is the intent of the award a audit work to the success for o year period with options tc for p to two more years; interested f erefore be asked to submit a prop the fiscal years of 1990 - 1994. n s A complete RFP package Is. availabU quest from the Finance Director, City ington, 300 E. Washin ton St., P. O. E Lexington, Virginia 2450. In order m sidered, proposals must be receivf~l office of the Finance Director no Ia 5:00 p.m. on 1-26 90 ' a °-` ~~` (15164) .~< ~±ota~- _,_ ,,3a~~4 i~sy ~u -" .1 .ar, , 2. .::tea - [• !~, • ~,.~ ~ rk.~ , Scotch'' 7664 "Post•it" Routing•Request Pad ROUTING -REQUEST ,.- ~, Id-4-~- Please ~ * ~~ ~n~ ~~ ~` ,1_ ~ ~ ,.. ^ READ To />~ Gta$~~ ~ ~~~iiii+ r>~`34s'.,, _"V >f ~ ^ HANDLE .~'"~'1~,°~ ~ ~ ~" /`.~ ~<;~~Jl ~C. ;,'` ^ APPROVE ''^D ~-, ~+y~' `~` /"'* r~ ~~I(1+ L- and "~ B AR~OFt~t,1PERVtSORS ~ ECO,r;. n E GAR~tETT. CHAIRMAN FORWARD L'[t'y,~INpSpR ~LS M, ~GISTERIAL DISTRICT TM PU~-'~a(E W.~~i BER'pj~~ VICE•CHAIRMAN ^ RETURN ~ ~ '^ ~ N D V M ~;` ~yd4pRIN~)/IAGISTERIAL DISTRICT ^ KEEP OR DISCARD 11 lJJJ BOB L. JOHNSON ` C~ '~.-„_ , McLt,N45 MAGISTERIAL gSTRICT ^ REVIEW WITH ME ~~~: U; `.~~ ~~-~ STEVEN A. MCGRAW CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT _ / ~ ~ HARRY C. NIGKENS Date From ~,y/~ ~ VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM: R. W. KoDers C/ DATE: January 2, 1990 / ~ 3 Elmer, I would like a report from the Economic Devbuspness Department regarding the planned visit to our area by leaders from dsrand DrV F o ine Graham at George Mason UniversiDty. Randall Edwar Please have a report on the specific dates that are being planned and the activities that will take place during the visit. I would like this report by January 19, 1990. As you know, this phase of our economic d thloPmw thout the Regional Partnership rity and we must proceed w RWR/bjh / 3// d ~^,~~ 1/l ~vl-rv~- Q.~p~ ~n,• Na 1/P- or. l/it c,•,.~~ Ar E.G„r=,~ ~„rC~llr. G~~l,~w.,. f~cc~+~d ^ ~ a(~ Or (~tr.+~.w. ~ue w~vt..t ~ir ttfx~GG.rG+(. T~;Gl ~s.~ ~s nm...~ -{~ oho ~c P~,,,,~,~,,,,~~!„ ~ N~h~,H,. uA- v;ri~F . Gll~ roEc aka (,~p~,/ ~ oistd-. 1{~ /~5`a'I~G~Q f ~ ~~°`1~af M ,l~iir G ViSI~ _ %~M~6.~ PO BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24018-0798 (703> 772-2004 VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY A 3.9 ± ACRE PARCEL OF LAND ) GENERALLY LOCATED AT NORTH ) INTERSECTION OF RT. 419 and ) CHAPARRAL DRIVE ) WITHIN THE CAVE SPRING ) MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT, AND ) RECORDED AS PARCEL ) #87.06-4-1 AND ) #87.06-4-2 ) IN THE ROANOKE COUNTY ) TAX RECORDS ) SECOND AMENDED PROFFER OF CONDITIONS TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY: Being in accord with §15.1-491.1, et se of the Code of Virginia, and §21.105E. of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance, the Petitioner, Fralin & Waldron, Inc., hereby voluntarily proffers to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, the following conditions to the rezoning of the above- referenced parcel of land: (1) To develop the subject property in substantial conformity to the site plan dated March 28, 1988, by Buford T. Lumsden & Associates, attached hereto as Exhibit "A". (2) To construct a fence along the boundary of the subject property at points where the subject property abuts with lots containing single family residences. OSTERHOUDT,FERGUSON NATT, AHERDN & AGEE ATTORNEYS-AT-LAW ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-1699 (3) To plant appropriate ground cover vegetation on the slopes of the subject property. (4) That the architecture of the new structure shall be in substantial conformity with the rendering prepared by Horner & Associates, Architects. (5) That the dumpster shall be moved to a location on the eastern end of the property near the railroad tracks. (6) To plant a buffer of 16 foot pine trees adjacent to the berm to be developed along the edge of the parking area adjacent to the residential properties. (7) The lighting shall be in substantial conformity with the plan presented to the Board of Supervisors with the provision that the lighting in the parking lot on poles so designated on the site plan shall not exceed fourteen feet. (8) To provide a detention facility designed to meet the requirements of a ten (10) post-development discharge reduced to a two (2) year pre-development discharge. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, FRALIN & WALDRON, iNC. Dated January 17, 1990 By rX1.i~n ~ Its Attorney prof.con.p t15TERH000T,FERGU50N NATT, ANERON & AGEE ATTORNEYS-AT-LAW ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 14018-1699 2 VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY A 1.01 acres parcel of land, ) generally located on the north) side of Brambleton Avenue ) within the Windsor Hills ) AMENDED Magisterial District, and ) PROFFER OF recorded as Parcel ) CONDITIONS No. 77.09-4-52.1 in the ) Roanoke County Tax Records. ) TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY: In accordance with Sec. 15.1-491.1 et seq. of the Code of Virginia and Sec. 21-105E of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance, the Petitioner, Brambleton Storage Corporation, (hereby voluntarily proffers to the Board of Supervisors of ,Roanoke County, Virginia the following conditions to the rezoning of the above-referenced parcel of land (the "Property"): 1. The Property will be developed in substantial compliance with the Concept Plan filed herewith, said Plan made by T. P. Parker & Son, Engineers & Surveyors, Ltd., dated December ~, 1989. 2. The rezoned property will be use only for the purpose of constructing and operating mini- warehouses thereon. - ~_ l~~~ 9~ LAW OFFICES WOODS, ROGERS a HAZLEOROVE ROANOKE, VA. 3. Petitioner agrees to install such fire hydrants as are necessary in accordance with the requirements of the County Fire Marshall. 4. The Property will not be utilized for any form of outside storage. 5. Petitioner agrees to slope the bank at the rear of the Property in accordance with the requirements of the Roanoke County Engineer; to hydroseed the bank so as to stabilize it with grass, shrubbery or other appropriate cover and to remain responsible for the maintenance of the slope and to promptly correct any erosion that may occur. 6. Petitioner agrees to create an attractive exterior by painting the metal of the proposed building or covering the same with natural wood. Respectfully submitted, BRAMBLETON STORAGE CORPORATION By: ~ l~. Mic ael K. Smeltzer, attorney uw oFFicEs WOODS,ROOERS l HAZLEOROVE ROANOKE, VA. -2- VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY 4920 Cove Road, N.W. ~ Tax Map ~~ 37.17-01-05 ~ 0.68 acre ) SECOND AMENDED PROFFER 0 ONDITI January 3, 1990 Petition of Tommy Hubbard, Jr. Joined by Professional Services Industries, Inc. TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY: In accordance with Sec. 15.1-491.1 et set. of the Code of Virginia and Sec. 21-1O5E of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance, the Petitioner Tommy Hubbard, Jr., joined by Professional Services Industries, Inc. hereby voluntarily proffers to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia certain conditions to the rezoning of the above- referenced parcel of land. The conditions so proffered include three conditions initially proffered with the Petitioner's application, one condition set forth in th1989 certain Amended Proffer of Conditions dated January 3, (should have read January 3, 1990) and an additional con- dition, all as follows: 1. No outside storage of materials. 2. Cosmetic improvements to the exterior of the building. 3. Plant new shrubs in front of the building. 4. The property will be used primarily for the sale of heating and air conditioning systems and guttering and related components, and for the inside storage and fabrication of materials incidental to such sales and for office, administrative and other purposes reasonably related to the activities above described. 5. The total area of all business signs on the property will not at any one time exceed the sum of 1.25 square feet for each lineal foot of street frontage and in no event more than 300 square feet, regardless of the number of lineal feet of street frontage. Respectfully submitted, Tommy Hubbard, Jr. By: Counse or Petitioner IY)f)h' y /9 L C E ~ OF p,OANpf,~ ~ t A 2 G~ ~ 2 j a 1 a '~°~ as S~SQUICENTENN~P~ A Bmutiful Beginning PAUL M. MAHONEY COUNTY ATTORN EY ~IILI1Tt1~ i1~ ~D~I1TA~t~ AIL~AMERIG CITY '~II~' 1979 1989 OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ATTORNEY 14 December 1989 JOSEPH B. OBENSHAIN SENIOR ASSISTANT COUNTY ATTORNEY Mr. Frank R. Radford Radford & Associates 2740 Franklin Road Suite 3 Roanoke, VA 24014 Dear Mr. Radford: VICKIE L. HUFFMAN ASSISTANT COUNTY ATTORNEY By letter dated November 29, 1989, to the members of the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors, you requested an opportunity to appear before the Board to request a clarification of certain proffered conditions which were attached to rezonings approved by the Board. Your request cites Section 15.1-491.5 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended. You seek a review by the governing body of a decision dated October 30, 1989, of the zoning ad- ministrator, Terrance Harrington. Although this decision applies only to the proffered conditions for the Hop-In store on Peters Creek Road, you also request a review of the proffered conditions for the Hop-In store on Electric Road, since the same circumstances are applicable to both properties. To properly bring this matter before the Board it will be necessary for you to complete the enclosed package of forms and to satisfy the advertising provisions of Section 15.1-431 of the State Code. These provisions require newspaper publication of an appropriate notice as well as notification of adjoining landowners. Mr. Jon Hartley in the Planning and Zoning Department (772-2092) can assist with these matters. Compliance with these requirements will not allow the scheduling of your appearance before the Board at its December 19, 1989, meeting as you requested. As you recall we discussed this matter on December 13, 1989, and I advised you of these require- ments and that the earliest date for Board action would be January 23, 1990. Sincerely, -~~~ ~~ Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney PMM/sg P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE COUNTY. VIRGINIA 2 4018-07 9 8 (703) 772-2007 ~~: ~e Barrl~ Cle k Mr. Terra H. Allen MS. Mary Adml~lstrator ~on the Board ,~~ r~ " ~~ - ~, rte, ~- - 3Q - ~q ~. ~ ~-~ ~ • ~ ~ ~ : -~ / '~ c~ REALTORS November 29, 1989 To Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Re: Frank R. & Mary E. Radford Dear Chairman and Members: On December 13, 1988 the property located at 2210 Electric Rd. S,W, was rezoned by your Board from R-3 to B-2 to accommodate development of a new Hop-In Food Store. In presenting the list of proffers, which we have enclosed, it was the intention and understanding of the petitioner that the pr+6ffered conditions concerning signage' pertained only to the square footage requirements of those signs which were to be erected on the site and did not include signs which are normally on the front of the building. Pursuant to Virginia Code Section 15.1-491.5, we ask that the Board of Supervisors further clarify that the signage proffers referred only to free standing signs on the site and not attached to the building. The same set of circumstances have taken place at the parcel rezoned at the corner of Peters Creek Road and Woodhaven Drive. We also ask that y°arcelrwas pezonededJulyn12,m19881fromaR-lhto Bite as well. This p I will be able to speak. before the Board at its earlies~r cxnveaience" hopefnl:Lg- fleceaber ° 1''3 ~ 198.9.. Respectively Submitted, Frank R. Radford FRR/mer Enclosures cc: Terrance Harrington Director of Planning P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, Va. 24018-0798 F1me~_,~i+-i County Administrator P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, Va. 24018-0798 Paul Mahoney County Attorney P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, Va. 24018-0798 2740 Franklin Road • Suite 3 • Roanoke, VA 24014 • (703) 343-5000