Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2/27/1990 - Regular~ P A N ~F a 9 2 ~ 2 a ti 18 ~ 88 gFSOUICEN7EN~~P ~ BcautijulBtginning ~' ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~n~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~~9~8~9 I L ROANORE COUNTY BOARD-OF SUPERVISORS ACTION AGENDA FEBRUARY 27„ 1990 the Roanoke County Board of Superv and the efourth Welcome to m on the Regular meetings are held on the sac are held at 7:00 p. Tuesday at 3:00 p.m• public hearing sda of each month. Deviations from this schedule will fourth Tue Y be announced. p~. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.) 1, Roll Call AT 3:04 P.M•• A7,I, PRESENT - HCN p,RRIVED AT 3:12 P.M. Invocation. The Reverend Laney Mofield 2' Colonial Avenue Baptist Church 3, Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag. . REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF B AGENDA ITEMS WR REQUESTED THAT ITEM D"1 BE HEARD FOLI,pWING D-1 AND D-2 R TIONS AND C • PROCLAMATION, AWARDS D. NEW BUSINESS RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNI ~ 1 1. Adoption of a Resolution authorizing the execution of a consolidation agreement between the County of Roanoke and the City of Roanoke. HEARD AFTER ITEMS 2 AND 3 R-22790-3 BLJ MOTION TO ADOPT RESOLUTION EXEC[TTING AGREEMENT AYES-SAM,BLJ,HCN,RWR NAYS-LBE 2. Approval of Public Private Partnership Policy R-22790-1 RWR MOTION TO APPROVE RESOLUTION AND POLICY WITH CHANGES TO REPORT RECOMMENDED BY BLJ URC 3. Approval of funding for Water Line Construction to Ingersoll-Rand. A-22790-2 BLJ MOTION TO APPROVE FUNDING AYES-LBE,BLJ,HCN,RWR ABSTAIN-SAM E. REQUESTS FOR WORR SESSIONS BLJ ASKED THAT SCHOOL BOARD BRING THEIR PROBLEMS REGARDING THIS YEAR'S BUDGET TO THE BUDGET WORK SESSION ON 3/20/90 AND WOULD LIRE ADVANCE INFORMATION FOR THE BUDGET WORK SESSIONS. F. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS NONE G. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING FOR REZONING ORDINANCE - CONSENT AGENDA HCN MOTION TO APPROVE 2ND READING AND PUBLIC HEARINGS - 3/27/90 URC 1. An ordinance granting a Use Not Provided 2 for Permit for an open air market located at 3704 Brambleton Avenue in the Cave Spring Magisterial District, upon the request of E. E. Carter. 2. An ordinance to rezone a 1.83 acre parcel from B-1 Conditional to B-1 Conditional (Amendment of Signage Proffers), located on Route 419; adjacent to Sugar Loaf Farms and Grander Park, in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District, upon the request of Hong Ki Min. 3. An ordinance to amend the Future Land Use Plan map designation of approximately 1.0 acre from Neighborhood Conservation to Transition, and to rezone said property from R-1 to B-1 for office use, located at 5304 Malvern Road in the Hollins Magisterial District, upon the request of Irwin Warren Simpson. 4. An ordinance to rezone a 2.85 acre parcel from B-2 Conditional To B-2 Conditional (Amendment of Signage Proffers) located at the northeastern corner of Peters Creek Road and Woodhaven Drive in the Hollins Magisterial District, upon the request of Hop-In Food Stores, Inc. 5. An ordinance to rezone a 0.67 acre parcel from B-2 Conditional to B-2 Conditional (Amendment of Signage Proffers), located at the northeastern corner of Glen Heather Dr. and Route 419, in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District upon the request of Hop-In Food Stores, Inc. H. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance authorizing easements for a water Industrial Park. RWR MOTION TO APPROVE FIRST READING 2ND READING - 3/13/90 the acquisition of line project, Bonsack 3 URc I. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES NONE J. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS SUPERVISOR ROBERS: ANNOUNCED THAT THERE WILL BE A MAJOR CONFERENCE AT VPI REGARDING THE SMART HIGHWAY. HE HAS DISCUSSED WITH THE PRINCIPAL OF THE GOVERNOR'S SCHOOL THE POSSIBILITY OF SENDING STUDENTS AND TEACHERS TO THE CONFERENCE. R. APPOINTMENTS NONE 1. Community Corrections Resources Board 2. League of Older American 3. Landfill Citizens Advisory Committee 4. Transportation and Safety Commission L. CONSENT AGENDA ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCITSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY. R-22790-4 LBE REQUESTED SEPARATE VOTE ON ITEM 1 BLJ MOTION TO APPROVE ITEMS 2 - 4 URC 1. Approval of Minutes - July 11, 1989 BLJ MOTION TO APPROVE AYES-SAM,BLJ,HCN,RWR ABSTAIN-LBE 2. Request from Bent Mountain Women's Club to use the Old Bent Mountain Fire Station. A-22790-4a 4 3. Confirmation of Committee Appointments to the Grievance Panel, Health Department Board of Directors, and Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission. A-22790-4b 4. Approval of Raffle Permit - Roanoke County School Food Service Chapter. A-22790-4c M. CITIZENS' COIrIldENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS NONE N. REPORTS HCN TO RECEIVE AND FILE URC 1. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance 2. General Fund Unappropriated Balance 3. Board Contingency Fund 4. Income Analysis and Statement of Expenditures for seven months ending January 31, 1990 5. Accounts Paid - January 1990 RECESS - 3:35 P.M. RECONVENE - 4:00 P.M. O. WORR SESSION 1. Proposed Sign Ordinance ECH TO BRING BACR REPORT RESPONDING TO SIGN SUBCOMMITTEE'S CONCERNS FOLLOWING FORMAT PRESENTED BY THE SIGN COMMITTEE P. EXECUTIVE SESSION pursuant to the Code of Virginia Section 2.1-344 A (7) as requested by Roanoke County staff NONE Q. CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE SESSION 5 NONE SAM MOTION TO RECESS FOR DINNER AT 5:20 P.M. - UW EVENING SESSION (7:00 P.M.L R. REQUEST FROM CITIZENS TO SPEAR REGARDING °NO LEFT TURN" SIGNS IN BOXLEY HILLS SUBDIVISION 6 CITIZENS SPORE IN OPPOSITION TO SIGNS 3 CITIZENS SPORE IN SIIPPORT OF SIGNS BLJ MOTION TO REQUEST THAT VDOT REMOVE SIGNS ON MALVERN AND COMMANDER AND SIGNS ON ABNEY REMAIN. AYES-SAM,BLJ,RWR NAYS-HCN ABSTAIN-LBE S. PUBLIC HEARING AND SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES (PUBLIC HEARING 290-1 WAS HEARD ON FEBRUARY 20, 1990) 290-2 Ordinance to amend the Future Land Use Plan Map designation of approximately 54 acres located west of Hollins Road and south of Lois Lane in the Hollins Magisterial District from Development to Principal Industrial and to change the zoning classification R-1 to the Zoning Classification M-1 for industrial purposes upon the application of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County. (CONTINUED FROM DECEMBER 19, 1989.) 0-22790-5 BLJ MOTION TO GRANT PETITION URC 290-3 Ordinance to amend the Future Land Use Plan map designation of approximately 105 acres from Development to Principal Industrial and to rezone said property from R-E to M-1 for industrial development located between Route 11/460 and Carson Road in the Hollins Magisterial District, upon the application of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County. 6 0-22790-6 BLJ MOTION TO GRANT PETITION AYES-SAM,BIJ,HCN,RWR NAYS-LBE 290-4 An Ordinance to amend the Future Land Use Map designation of a 53.44 acre tract from Development to Principal Industrial and to rezone said property from R-E to M-1 for industrial development, located east of West Ruritan Road and north of Homestead Lane, Hollins Magisterial District upon the request of the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors. (PETITIONER REQUESTED CONTINUANCE TO MARCH 27, 1990) CONTINUED TO 3/27/90 290-5 An ordinance to amend the Future Land Use Map designation of a 24.09 acre tract from Rural Village to Principal Industrial, and to conditionally rezone said property from M-2 to M-3 to construct and operate an asphalt batch mix plant, and east of the Blue Ridge Parkway in the Cave Spring Magisterial District, upon the request of Virginia Asphalt Paving Co., Inc. 0-22790-7 RWR TO DENY PETITION AYES-LBE,SAM,RWR NAYS-BLJ,HCN T. PUBLIC HEARINGS 290-6 Public Hearing to elicit comment on Pinkard Court Community Development Block Grant application. R-22790-8 HCN TO ADOPT RESOLUTION AND SUBMIT GRANT APPLICATION URC U. CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS NONE 7 OTHER BUSINESS ECH ASKED FOR A 30 DAY EXTENSION OF OPTION AGREEMENT FOR 37.86 ACRE TRACT KNOWN AS THE LLOYD PROPERTY BLJ MOTION TO APPROVE 30 DAY EXTENSION UW HCN REQUESTED THAT THE STAFF AND PLANNING COMMISSION PRESENT STAFF REPORTS REGARDING PROFFERED CONDITIONS IN A CONSISTENT MANNER. V . ADJOURNMENT RWR MOTION AT 10:02 P.M. - UW 8 \ ~. ' All-AMERICA C ; ~ POAN K r ~~~e z ~~ 9 ~,,~~~~ z ~~ a ~ ~~~ a. ~s ~~ as ~'9 '8 afSOU1CENTENN`P~ OF SUPERVISORS ROANORE COUNTY BOARD ,4 BtautirulBtginning AGENDA FEBRUARY 27, 1990 Board of Supe~isors meeting. County and the fourth Welcome to the Roanoke the second Tuesday m on the Regular meetings are held on s are held at 7:00 p- at 3:00 p•m• public hearing Tuesday month. Deviations from this schedule wil fourth Tuesday of each be announced. p~ • OPENING CEREMONIES ( 3 : 0 0 P . M . ) 1• Roll Call. The Reverend Laney Mofield 2• Invocation: tist Church Colonial Avenue Bap led e of Allegiance to the United States Flag• 3. P g TO POSTPONE, ADD TO, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF B• REQUESTS AGENDA ITEMS C. D. TIONS, RESOLUTIONS, gECOGNITIONS, AND AWARDS PROCLAMA NEW BUSINESS tion of Resolution authorizing the execution 1, Adop reement between the County of of a consolidation agof Roanoke. Roanoke and the City roval of Public Private Partnership Policy 2. APP 1 A royal of funding for Water Line Construction to 3. PP Ingersoll-Rand. E. REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS F. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS PUBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING FOR REQUESTS G. FOR - CONSENT AGENDA ORDINANCE REZONING ce granting a Use Not Provided for d at 3704 1. An ordinan en air market lorai.ng permit for an oP S Brambleton Avenue in tupo athe request of E. District, Magisterial E. Carter. arcel An ordina aB118Condit onal n 2. to Conditional proffers), located on from B-1 a (Amendment of acentgto Sugar Loaf Farms and adj 9 , Route 41 Grander Park, in the Windsor Hills est of the requ Magisterial District, upon Hong Ki Min. An ordinance to amend the Proximately 1S0 f aPP 3. Plan map designation o from Neighborhood Conservat~o erty from acre Transition, and to rezone slocated at 5304 R-1 to B-1 for office use, isterial a s e lrwin Warren Malvern Roud of request the on District, P Simpson. arcel 4. pn ordinaC ditionalnToaB?2$Conditional d at on from B-2 na a Proffers) locate Creek Roa (Amendment of Sig g r the northeasterniverin the Hollins Dr f and Woodhaven u on the request o Magisterial District, P 2 Hop-In Food Stores, Inc. arcel 5. An ordi2aConditionalntoaB-26COndit onal from B a e proffers), located at (Amendment of Sign g the northeastern ctheeWindsoreH llsther Dr. - and Route 419, In on the request of Hop Magisterial Distinct up In Food Stores, H. FIRST BEADING OF ORDINANCES the acquisition of easements 1, Ordinance authorizing Bonsack Industrial Park. for a water line project, I. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES J. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOLD ~BERS g. APPOINTMENTS 1, Community Corrections Resources Board 2, League of Older American 3, Landfill Citizens Advisory Committee 4, Transportation and Safety Commission I,. CONSENT AGENDA p,GENDA ARE LISTED UNDER T~ CON- ALL MATTERS TO BE ROUTINE AN WD ILL BE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD OR FORMS LISTED ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FO ~T BETCONSIDEREDE BELOW. I OMDTHE CON ENT AGENDA AND WILL REMOVED FR SEPARATELY. - July 11, 1989 1. Approval of Minutes Re est from Bent Mountain Women's Club to use the 2. ~ 3 Old Bent Mountain Fire Station. 3, Confirmation of Committee Appointments to the Health Department Board of Grievance Panel, Directors, and Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission. School 4 , Approval of Raf f lee~e~ 1t - Roanoke County Food Service Chapt M. CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS N. REPORTS 1. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance 2, General Fund Unappropriated Balance ency Fund 3, Board Conting sis and Statement of Expenditures 4, Income Analy January 31, 1990 for seven months ending 5, Accounts Paid - January 1990 O. FJORK SESSION 1, Proposed Sign Ordinance ursuant to the Code of Virginia p. E~CUTIVE SESSION P7 as requested by Roanoke County Section 2.1-344 A ( ) staff Q, CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE SESSION EVENING SESSION (7.00 P.M•) 4 290-6 U. V. Public Hearing to elicit comment Community Development Block Gran CITIZENS' COM1rIENTS AND CO~JNICp,TIONS p,I~70URNMENT 6 on Pinkard Court t application. i ~ T't `J ~y OF SUPERVISORS OF ROATION COCE~~~ / AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THTHE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRA VIRGINIA, HELD AT FEBRUARY 27, 1990 TUESDAY, OF A AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION ORE AND RESOLUTION 227_x= OF SAID IDATION AGREEMENT $ETW CTING E THE N FILING CONSOL OF RO~iORE DIRE THE CITY PAPERS WITH THE CIRCUIT COURTS FO AGREEMENT AND OTHER AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN D THE COUNTY, PINYON, AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY WITH THE TOWN OF AGREEMENT RTHER PROCEEDINGS IN ACCORDANCE THEREWIT FU of to the provisions 1989 pursuant WHEREAS, in February, 1950, as amended, Code of Virginia, Section 15.1-1132, of the filed with the County of Roanoke and the certain petitions were and certain thereof of Roanoke and with the Circuit Courts bodies City the governing rs were entered by said courts directing to initiate Orde the City of Roanoke of Roanoke and of the County and, ion proceedings pursuant to said section, otiating eg consolidat over the past twelve months Consolidation WHEREAS, sessions on f ive negotiating Teams have held more than twenty- City and have developed a consolidation behalf of the County an Orders and the provisions of agreement in accordance with said inia, of Title 15.1, of the Code of Virg Article 4, Chapter 26- as amended, and, of 1950, anticipated in a series WHEREAS, numerous citizens have P consolidation to develop and comment upon the proposed workshops agreement, and, iced by Section EREAS, after legal notice provided as reCN ~ 1950, as amended, public Code of Virginia, 15.1-1137, of the of Roanoke and were held by the City Council for the City hearings of Roanoke on February 20. the Board of Supervisors for the County i r ~ to speak on this agreement and the 1990, and all citizens desiring rovided an opportunity to adoption of this resolution have been p do so, and; otiating Team of $Ob L' WHEREAS, the County Consolidation Neg Attorney, Mahoney, County Harry C. Nickens, and Paul M• such Board of Supervisors that Johnson, ended to the on have recomm the Board, executed be accepted by reement or the City Ag Courts f Consolidation with the Circuit behalf of the County and filed 1990. on or before February 28' Board of Supervisors of and the County NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Virginia, as follows: County's Roanoke County, of the and the members 1. That the Chairman for and on e otiating Team are hereby authorized, Board to Consolidation N g the Clerk to the to execute and behalf of the County and the County, reement between the City a Consolidation Ag is on file in the Office attest, of which dated February 28, 1990, a copy of the Clerk to the Board. and the Clerk to the Board are hereby 2, That the Chairman the Board of behalf of a petition on execute City and the authorized to for the Circuit Courts ra ing that the to the Supervisors p Y be held with respect County order that a referendum reement. of such Ag idation Agreement pursuant to Section 9 Consol the Board are hereby 3, That the Chairman and the Clerk to to execute and attest, for and on behalf of the County, the County and the authorized, the City, respectively, an Agreement between "Town"), such Agreement being attached Town of Vinton (hereinafter and incorporated by e Consolidation Agreement as Exhibit D to th for expansion of the boundaries of reference therein and providing owers, rights, and authorities of the the respective p Metropolitan the Town and Roanoke d the consolidated government ~ Town an vis each other. Government) vis-a- and the Clerk to the Board are here y 4. That the Chairman to execute and attest, county for and on behalf of the applications, authorized, leadings- etitions, P such ancillary P ermit o p respectively, other legal papers as shall be necessary to be placed on the ballot at certificates and the question of consolidation 1990. referendum to be held on November 6- s contracts, and other legal documents 5. That all agreement , ce shall be approved as to form by the authorized by this ordinan Attorney. for County shall be authorized to file, 6, That the County Attorney County, any petitions, pleadings- on ers with Federal an and behalf of the ' ations, certificates and other legal Pa are deemed necessary applic encies as administrative ag of consolidation to be State courts and to permit the question ro er by him and p P 1990. referendum on November 6, and an considered at to forty t the Clerk to the Board is directed ~, Tha of the Council of the ted copy of this ordinance to the Clerk the Clerk attes Town Council, of Roanoke, the Clerk of the Vinton City and the Judges of the Circuit Courts of the City of Salem Council, and the County. the following for the City and carried by On motion of Supe~isor Johnson, recorded vote: Johnson, Nickens, Robers AYES. Supervisors McGraw, NAYS: Supe~isor Eddy A Cppy TEST : .~Yj~x/w~, ~. Mary H. Allen, Clerk ervisors Roanoke County Board of Sup cc; File City Council Clerk, Roanoke Council Clerk, Vinton TownCouncil Circuit Court Clerk, Salem City Trabue, Judge- Circuit Court The Honorable KennethWEllett, Chief Judge- The Honorable County Attorney Budget paul Mahoney'Director, Management & Reta Buambliss, Assistant County Administrator John Ch ACTION NO. ITEM NO • ~ , r ETING OF THE BOARD OF ~,rY RADM 1,JISTRATIDN CIE TER AT A REGULAR 1''IE COUN COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE MEETING DATE: February 27- 199,0 _ UTION AUTHORIZING THE EXEN yIOF ROANOKE AND THE AGENDA ITEM' RESOL OF SAID TION AGREEMENT BETW DIREC~ NG TH THE IC RCUIT COURTS CITY OF ROANOKE AGREEMENT AND OTHER THE R CO NT , AUTHORIZING THE FOR THE CITY AND OF VINTON, EXECUTION OF AN AGREE~NT WITH THE TOWN UTHORIZING FURTHER PROCEEDINGS IN ACCORDANCE AND A THEREWITH ~~ DMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: COUNTY A ~ ~~~~ ~u~~~~~ ~ a~~-~ ~~~ BACKGROUND' 989 petitions were filed132 of the State Code In February °f ursuant to Section 15.1 1 to effect bodies of the City and the County and Roanoke County p asking the governing reement. and the a consolidation ag ear negotiating teams from the City Over the past y reement in accordance a consolidation ag Citizen workshops, County have met to develop irements. held to develop, with the judicial and statutory raga have been on the draft legal notices and public hearing rtise and provide a forum for citizen comments uP adve reement. consolidation ag SUMMARY OF INFORMATION' fired by Section al notice and publication as raga ervisors After leg was held by the Board of Sup a public hearing on the consolithe 15.1-1137, 1990 to secure citizen comment uP on February 20' and the adoption of a resolution authorizing tion agreement The attached Resolution sunegrizes: execution of this agreement. Board and the members °f ement oon behalf oflthe the Chairman of the etition asking the Circuit Court to order ing team to executeo ha P onsolidation afire to this consolidation County; the filing that a referendum be held with respec xecution of the agreement with the Town of Vin on agreement, the a other documents nec1es of the (Exhibit D) , the execution of any and to forward cop this question on the hallo arties. placing Resolution to various intereste p ' ~ ~-~ OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISOR15T~T O~~ENTER,rTTY, AT A REGULAR MEETING HELD AT THE ROANOKE ~CSUNTY AD1990 VIRGINIA, TUESDAY, FEBRUA$Y 27, 22790-1 ADOPTING A PUBLI pE~pMENT INTROp,NORE RESOLUTION --- POLICY FOR ENCOURAGING ECONOMIC I,~ COUNTY the general WHEREAS, the expenditure of public funds for industrial, and ose of promoting Roanoke County's commercial, pure ublic purpose; and business development is a lawful, valid, p 81286-169 authorizes the payment of a WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 1 water connection fee by resolution of the portion of the tota Virginia, for certain Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County- determined to be in the commercial or industrial projects which are the County's economic development and which best interests of to ment; and generate significant emP Y ecify certain of a policy to sP WHEREAS, the adoption rove r the application of this provision will P guidelines fo local incentives in beneficial in determining the scope of ment projects . negotiations for economic develop Su ervisors of Roanoke County, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of P Virginia, as follows: the at the Board hereby adopts and establishes 1. Th Policy" in "Roanoke County Public-Private Partnership following 1 ing the provisions of the order to provide policy guidance in app Y de in negotiations concerning local incentives for Roanoke County Co economic development projects. AMORE COUNTY PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP POLICY site RO ubllc fund all or part of P Roanoke County maY fees for water and Pur_---pO-= e= roads , and of f site f a ~ha~ Y is manufacturing , development cos a;- qualifying industry to ent of ten sewer for: a roduct with a minimum emP YTn processing or assembling P Item No . ~ ~~"``~ TING OF THE BOARD OF S A MINISTRATION OCENTER AT A REGULAR MEE HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY COUNTY, VIRGINIA, IN ROp,NOKE, VA ON TUESDAY, MEETING DATE: February 27, 1990 SUBJECT: Public-Private Partnership Policy ~~ ~ COMMENTS : ~, COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR S C~~~ ~~~°'`j~_:~ "r ° SUMMARY OF INFORMATION ment or part of public site develop fund all fees for water and sewer foro~ Roanoke County maY rocessing costs, roads, and off site facility manufacturing, P industry that is to ent of ten full time a) qualifying minimum en-P ~ employing 250 full assembling a product witoh employer initially to ees, or b) a maj emp Y time jobs. BACKGROUND: for local economic federal assistance infrastructure Despite declining in U.S• economy and increasing requested to ment, a Chang g being many of develop local governments are continually Nationally, challengeS- Roanoke County cannot however, award incentives a° eataX related,usinesse es. these incentives otential industry offer tax incentives to P the County has cannot offer tax inc artri rships since 1986• While Roanoke County ublic-private p SWIP) projected been involved in severa8outhwest IndustriaWillrhave surpassed the The first such project, the County employers a seven year payback. In 1993, Today, SWIP has six 000 000. an estimated $36, original investment of $lo3ees, generating with a total of 100 emp Y annually for the County. erfelt to participate with the 250 acre In 1988, the County agree~o jointly develop to ees ment Corporation five companies with 125 emp Y Develop ro ect. Presently, Tanned and/or under Valleypointe p 7 Two new buildings are p have located there. construction. -a TING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERDMINISTRp,TION CENTER,NTY, AT A REGULAR MEE COUNTY A VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROAIJOE UARY 27, 1990 TUESDAY, TION ADOPTING A PUBLIC-PRIMENT INROANOKEPCOUNTYY RESOLU FOR ENCOURAGING ECONOMIC DEVELOP .c funds for the general enditure of publi WHEREAS, the exP and romoting Roanoke County's commercial, industrial, purpose of p ublic purpose; and valid, p business development is a lawful, a ent of a WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 81286-169 authorizes the P ~ of the resolutio ortion of the total water connection fee by is for certain P Virgin Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, 'ndustrial projects which are determined to be in the commercial or i ment and which best interests of the County's economic develop generate significant employment; and a policy to specify certain WHEREAS, the adoption of rovision will prove guidelines for the application of this P determining the scope of local incentives in beneficial in ment projects. negotiations for economic develop Su ervisors of Roanoke County, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of P Virginia, as follows: t the Board hereby adopts and establishes the 1, Tha policy" in "Roanoke County Public-Private Partnership following rovisions of the order to provide policy guidance in applying the p Code in negotiations concerning local incentives for Roanoke County economic development projects. ROANORB COIINTY PIIBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP POLICY site art of public Roanoke County may fund all or P fees for water and Pur- p-` e' roads, and off site facility manufacturing, development costs, industry that is a) qualifying to ent of ten sewer for: a roduct with a minimum emp emmlo ing 250 processing or assembling a major employer initially P Y full time employees; or b) ~ ) A a for any private sefi~e Roanoke County will not p Y firing Limitations: or waive any ordinances requ pre treatment facilities a certification. protection or industrial discharg anticipation from Roanoke County shall fund its p sources. ated tax revenue, or from an Economic Fundin funds. the Generari Fund or others special non-utility Developme sound to ' tent to continue the maiWtenance of a fisca YCo Y ater and sewer servic unt There is an In rise fund to provide enterp ustomers. rovision is authorized by utility sled by Ordinance 8-12-86-169, Section 3b.) County utility c Code Chapter 22 as amen rovided by the County p, written agreement on a form p fired to specify terms of the Public-Priva e Agreement: be requ Att~ may this Partnership. and adopting 2, That this Resolution establishing full force and effect from and after February Policy shall be in 27, 1990. ACTION # AT A REGULAR MHELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA MEETING DATE. February 27, 1990 A-22790-2 ITEM NUMBER ~ ~ 3 OF SUyEADMINISTRATION CENTER COUNT TEM: Funding for Water Line Construction to AGENDA I Ingersoll-Rand / COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND. tan for the Ingersoll-Rand . at Glenvar. The The County has rec on ethe Shamrock site that building ro erty was approved consideri ro erty Manufacturing rezoning and sale of this P p ublic water to serve this p P the County would cons er site.e p and the adjacent Krug SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Daugherty ~~ water line extension al scent to the Staff has designed a 12 oint adj h the Shamroc This water line will provide service Road and throug the remaining five Richfield Community property. ersoll-Rand, developed for Ing rovide for futThe to the site being the Kruger site and p teeny Drive. acre tract of Shamrock, water line on Alleg ction cost for this watnTbtalned nstruction is connection to the existing estimated p,ll sreq $46,000. wired easements have ee ALTERNATIVES AND IMPACTS: ~ ect will cost $46,000. These /'~ rovided by the Water Off-site This water line i a d w 11 berP7 ees paid for connection funds are availabl Facility Fund. Future off-site facility enerate adequate funds to cover this an to this water line will g wired. other off-site facilities req STAFF RECOMMENDATION: rove funding in the amount of Staff recommends the Board apP ro ect. 6 000 for this water line construction p 7 $4 , '' SUBMITTED BY: Clifford aig- p.E. Utility Director Approved ( ~ Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to _-- ACTION Motion by: Bob L. Johnson Eddy Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers cc: File Utilities Cliff Craig, Director, Reta Busher, Director, Management & Budget Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance AppROVED: ~~~ ~ Elmer C. Hod County Administrator VOTE No Yes ~-- ~- _~- pbs .Stain '. ~ r ~ ~ /`` ``~ INGERSOLL-RAND SITE .~ ~ ~ +~` RICHFIELD ~ ~ ~ - ~"~~ 12"WATER LI ,.>K \ SHp,MROCK s s,, KRUGER O TI~1I l.si r +~~ COMM)EV ~pMENT ES AND n.l n'+ ran/ry /~wN. e/ A~i~/nN MI••' a~ ~.,., y~ ~.~.,.~ eF ` 1! ~~ 1l~k ~/ Y /KNIIi1.~Ip~NOM/~~n C~in+' InC 19 T.39 K - ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ p10 55.09"1'19 1.100' .A ~~ff + 1 .. ~ vr>r•~ tar/. ~ 's ~ 2 r lz.z~ k ~' ~ / . 0 s`~~. ~ ' ~' / DRL , ` ~~~ / • ~ ~ ~• •` M p~la. ` .~ 12" WATER LINE EXTENSION TO INGERSOLL-RAND 1 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. ~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: February 27, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: Requests for Public Hearing and First Reading for Rezoning Ordinances Consent Agenda COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND' The first reading on these ordinances is accomplished by adoption of these ordinances in the manner of consent agenda items. The adoption of these items does not imply approval of the substantive content of the requested zoning actions, rather approval satisfies the procedural requirements of the County Charter and schedules the required public hearing and second reading of these ordinances. The second reading and public hearing on these ordinances is scheduled for March 27. 1990. The titles of these ordinances are as follows: 1. An ordinance granting a Use Not Provided for Permit for an open air market located at 3704 Brambleton Ave. in the Cave Spring Magisterial District, upon the request of E. E. Carter. 2. An ordinance to rezone a 1.83 acre parcel from B-1 Conditional to B-1 Conditional (Amendment of Signage Proffers), located on Route 419, adjacent to Sugar Loaf Farms and Grander Park, in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District, upon the request of Hong Ki Min. 3. An ordinance to amend the Future Land Use Plan map designation of approximately 1.0 acre from Neighborhood Conservation to Transition, and to rezone said property from R-1 to B-1 for office use, located at 5304 Malvern Rd. in the Hollins Magisterial District, upon the request of Irwin Warren Simpson. 4. An ordinance to rezone a 2.85 acre parcel from B-2 Conditional to B-2 Conditional (Amendment of Signage Proffers), located at the northeastern corner of Peters ~~-5 2 Creek Road and Woodhaven Dr. in the Hollins Magisterial District, upon,the request ~f Hop-In Food Stores Inc. 5. An ordinance to rezone a .067 acre parcel from B-2 Conditional to B-2 Conditional (Amendment of Signage Proffers), located at the northeastern corner of Glen Heather Dr. and Route 419, yin the Windsor Hills Magister- ial District upon the request of Hop-In Food Stores Inc. 1 ~ STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends as follows: (1) That the Board approve and adopt the first reading of these rezoning ordinances for the purpose of scheduling the second reading and public hearing for March 27. 1990. (2) That this section of the agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth as Items 1 through 5, inclusive, and that the Clerk is authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this action. Respectfully submitted, ~ .~ a~~ ~ Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney Action Vote No Yes Abs Approved ( ) Motion by Eddy Johnson Denied ( ) McGraw Received ( ) Nickens Referred to Robers ~~~ q° `~ ROANORB COUNTY t ' "USE NOT PROVIDED FOR" PERMIT APPLICATIO ' 1. Applicant's Name: ~ ~ r Phone: Z~ Address: 3~~,,~' ~~ .~~~~ i~2~~ ~/GL . Z i p 2. Location of Property: 3 ~D ~ ~ '""_" ~~~-~'''` ~'~`'~' 3 . New Tax Map # : -T ~7 / ~ - ~ -- / Old Tax Map # : ,r,C 2 I~ 3 1~l / 4. Magisterial District Location: f°i4 G'~ Spl~ LN ~ 5. Size of Property: O. ?S' ~ R~ acres/sq. ft. Size of Proposed Use Not Provided For: acres/sq. ft. 6. Existing Land Use: ~~ PAN ,~,~~R /f r T - - Existing Zoning: /V1 Z- ~jL~+ ~~~r ~...C'~~1C21 '~ eNAL Q- Yl 7 . Proposed Land Use: D P C// i1 i /~ N1 ~~-Di.y,G 8. Comprehensive Plan Designation: ~ 0 P. 9. Are Conditions being Proffered? Yes No 10. Proposed Annual Gross Revenue: 11. Value of Land: Value of (Proposed) Buildings: 12. Value of Machinery & Tools: Number to be Employed: 13. Check Completed Items: Consultation _~ Letter of Application ~ ~ Legal Forms ~. ~~ ~ ~ Application Fee 14. Applicant's Signature: _~ 8}" x 11" Concept Plan List of Adjacent Properties Public Hearing Notices Issued ~~ 15. Owner's Consent, if different than applicant: Name: Signature: -------------------------------------------------- OFFICE USE ONLY: Application Deadline: / -v~b'q 0 Hearing Date: 3- 6 , 9~ ' ~ ~( f Date Received: ~~ ~Z ~ ~ a Received By: Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: _ Action: ~0~4N~~.v ~pu/f B~~,i1,P0 ~f S~/Pf,P /SD~?S; ~l yoJ~-~~t/v~o-L9 ~viP ~fiPm~~ fo ~E'•P~/,f~ ~~ ~~~ .l;,~ ,~A,~,~~7`.~t 3~d ~ B~A,~,~~~y,~ ~~/,~ ocf ~~ i i • • / • V ~~' • ~ ~ . • ~~ b ~ ~ . • . ~ ~ '~ ,_ _ ~_ ~. .~ ~-- ' ~0~ ~ •~ \ ® ~~ J ~ ' . r s~ ~ ~?~ a J a riC .y. , ~ ~•~ s,_ W r ~GyT ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a E ~ ~ ~ a W ~ o N~Q ~ ~ •~ / ' ~ ~~ ~ M ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~. O - a sC ~ O y i~ ~ ~ ,--. O, . ~~' Q ~, o ~-~ ,~v~ .°~ ES ~ ~ ~ , I / 1 ~ ~ / / ~ ~~ ., ~,h ~ ~ ~ • ~ J ~ c . jj. M 3d. E[ ~IE~P E ~ o , BEST/ E /y1. C~9RTER o Q. srs Pa s~~ TOTAC ~A. 3 ~O AC. TAK/N6 A~ - ~C• ~eESi~r,+~ac l~~73.4C. ' ` ~ ~C` Y~CG ONE /~ENCf , O N 1 _ /P' L'O/~K: /f/AL L s' I ;E',q~~Mf~VT A,~.4 ' ~ ,~ ~'~P~:r ` ~',~ ~~ ' /lulu /oe~ P ~ • O ,~ ~, w ,r.~-vCG ~~ ~ r .~ . . . v /OSD.S ~ •~ 9J A,pr ` ~ ~ - ~" Q~ od~~N d c ,r ~VfGC ELEC. IvMP © 0 • C ~ ~ ~• ,. • - , .. .. ~ 1. - _. _._ .t~J o. ~in.9/ ltd ~ ,, /v„ P/NEs rio of .f , \ \~ ~ 'mac REC i ~ ~t ~A ROANOKE COIINTY REZONING APPLICATION PAS c I l£ : G - ~.. By. ~t/ Od~GG v ~~ro (703) 989-3238 Home Phone: (703) _344-0007 Office 1. Owner' 8 Name: Hon Ri Min Address: 5109 Elk Hill Drive Roanoke VA 24014 (703)989-3238 Home Phone: (703)344-0007 Office 2. Applicant's Name: Hon Ki Min Address: 5109 Elk Hill Drive Roanoke VA 24014 3. Location of Property: Route 419 ad acent to Su ar Loaf Farms and Orlander Park Tax Map Number(s) : 76.15-1-4 4. Magisterial District: Windsor Hills 5. Size of Property: 1.83 Acres 6. Existing Zoning: 1 - Existing Land Use: Constructing and maintaining an office building f 7. Proposed Zoning: ( Proposed Land Use: Constructin and maintainin an office buildin 8. Comprehensive Plan Designation: increase size of identification sign XX 9. Are Conditions Proffered With This Request? Yes No __ ffers as apart of your applica- (If you are voluntarily offering pro _ tion, these proffers must be r n ationgof thes proffersh) planning Staff can assist you in th p per' 10. Value of Land and (Proposed) Buildings: The Following Items l+tust Be Submitted With This Application. Please 11. Check If Encloied.OrPIncompleteWill Not Be Accepted If Any Of ese Items Are Kiss nq ,~ Letter of Application XX Concept Plan _ Metes and Bounds Description XX List of Adjacent Owners of Property (Attach Exhibit A) -Vicinity leap Application Fee Written Proffers Water awl Sewer Application (If Applicable) 12. Signature Of Property Owns Contract Purchaser, Or Owner's Agent: Signature ~ Date January 16, 1990 r ~~ r~a~: Hosts Ki Mfn Summit Producer Ctuirmans Council National Group Insurance Lrader Councll Regional Via-President, 1985 National Association of Lite Underwriters Life Member, Mllion Dollu Round Tabk HONG KI MIN dt ASSOCIATES . New York Life insuratxx Company 817 South Jefferson Street Roanoke, Virginia 24016 Phone (703) 344.0007 Fax (703) 982-0873 Kathy A. Lodge Ezecutive Secreury Jana Setiectt Group and Health Consulunr January 16, 1990 Roanoke County Administration Center 3738 Brambleton Avenue, SW p.0. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 Dear Sir or Madam On December 10, 1985, the 1.83 acres of land located on Route 419, Parcel 76.15-1-4 in the Roanoke County Tax Maps and recorded in Deed Book 853, page 748, was rezoned from R-1 to B-1. At the time of rezoning certain conditions were established, (a copy of the conditions are enclosed), condition 11 deals with the identification sign. I would like to request that this condition be amended to allow a sign larger than 25 square feet in area and higher than four feet from the ground. The sign I would like to install is 12'10" tall, and is 84.11 square feet in area, this meets Roanoke County's sign specifications. Under the present conditions the identification sign (which you can see in front of the building now) is detrimental for the building, the tenants, and the neighborhood. The sign is just too small for the building and not large enough for the tenants use. The proposed sign will give both a prestigious and impressive look for the building itself, and the neigh- borhood, at the same time it will provide extra space for the tenants use. The proposed sign was designed by the same professional architect who designed the building, and all future tenants will be required to have their signage examined by the architect for compatability. At the time of rezoning, I was just not aware that the sign would not be compatable with the building, I think this was a case of my inexperience and I did not realize until we put up the present sign how much is lowered the image of the building and the neighborhood. I was assisted by the committee previously, and I look forward to your support and assistance once again with this request. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely your ~, f Ho Ri Min Hi~i/kal Attachments E7NANClAL • ESTATE • INSURANCE CONSULTANTS ~~~ ~ _~ ~~f'V~~w'L`~ j'~r~l)'r ~ • "lf ~°' ~f7j ~1 FEg j ~~ ,y ~ ~~ 4712 Easthill Drive Roanoke, Virginia 24018 January 26, 1990 Mr. Hong Ki Min 817 South Jefferson Street Roanoke, Virginia 24016 Dear Mr. Min: We have received your letter of January 18 regarding the proposed sign change. Please note that item #11 of the proffered conditions clearly states that the sign shall wondering iftthis particularrcondition willpbephonored itck- lit and we are peraission is granted for the larger sign. The main issue at this point, however, seems to be the question of the fence. Perhaps you will recall during our many conversations prior to rezoning the feelings expressed by the adjoining neighbors regarding privacy and security. It was for that reason that you agreed to erect the stockade fence at the highest point erectethispfence asmweiunderstoodpwouldtbeldone!that you did not intend to Item No. 12 of the proffered conditions states "..applicant and his archi- tect will meet with and consult with an advisory committee of selected neighbors concerning the architectural style of the structure and its coapatibility with the neighborhood." It is certainly true that this was done; howevdiscardedrimmediately afteratheprezoningswaseapproved.uiWeiwereere apparently not informed of this change. We will be happy to discuss the proposed proffer change regarding the sign but, atationsofe rofferwanddsiteoplanetooreflectstheefenceiaslinitially modif is P discussed. Sincerely, ~~~ ~~ Sandra S. Rosebro cc: Roanoke County Planning Commission Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Mr. Terry Harrington . arm ) OF d Orlander Park ) CONDO NS "+ withitl Lh• windsos Mille - ) Magisterial District ) TO THE UONORABLE SUPERVISOR8 OP ROANORE COUNTY: Being in accord with Sec. 15.1-491.1 et seq. of the Code of Virginia and Sec. 21-11 of the Code of Roanoke County. the Petitioner hereby voluntarily proffers to the Board of Supecvisors of Roanoke County, Virginia the following conditions to the zezoning of the above-referenced parcel of land. 1. The structure will be in general conformance witlf the site plan. imum height of the proposed office building Z, The max will be 2 stories above grade. imum height of parking lot lighting will 3. The max be 14 feet. Barking lot lighting will be directed away from 4. adjoining landowners. 5. The zoning classification of the property shall revert to R-1 upon: a. Resale of property or parts thereof prior to commencement of the project. b. Failure to close on contzact with Guy S. Clifton and Pauline H. Clifton c. Failure to commence construction of planned building within one year from date of rezoning to B-l. d. Failure to complete said project within a reasonable length of time from date of commencement. 6. A security fence, stockade-type, minimum height of six feet, shall be built and maintained on the higher elevation of the buffer zones on the northwest and south sides of the property. 7. Trash pickup areas, as well as heating and cooling equipment, shall be concealed from view. 8. All utilities shall be underground. 9. Drainage shall be contained and directed to exit at the lower southeast area of property. 10. Unauthorized traffic after business hours shall be prohibited. 11. Not more than one front-lit identification sign shall be allowed on property. The sign shall be no more than 25 square feet in area and shall not be higher than four feet froao the ground. 12. The applicant and his architect will meet with and consult with an advisory committee of selected neighbors concerning the architectural style of the structure and its compatibility with the neighborhood. 3 J ~~,~ ~~~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~o : ~ '` ~ i yr ~~$.~ . +E~ ~ ~~ '- ~~ ~,~ o . ~~ ~ ~Q ,~ .~~ ~' ~o~ ~~~~~p Attachment 1 Date Rec. s 1 33 90 ~"-~ ~` ~ '~~_ Received By: ~5 Ia' ~•~~~,~ •.~.~,Case No. s, . ; ~,~ . , ' ~. ROANOKE COUNTY REZONING APPLICATION • • ~ i , ., ,;~;~;; ~_; .~ . . ~:~ ~`' ~•,!~;,~,:;,~.. .~- 362-2y14 ~ Irwin Warren Sin- a ,,,phone . 1. Owner s Name: ` 04 Malvern Road N. 681 ~ J e Va. 24012 Address: 62 2914 2. Applicant's Name: Irvin Warren Simpson Phone: 3 - 997-z23'~ Address: 5304 Malvern Rd, NW Roanoke, Va. 3. Location of Property: 53~ Malvern Road NW Roanoke, Va Tax Map Number(s): 38.14 ~ ~ 61 4. Magisterial District: 5. Size of Property: 141'X 12U~ 6. Existing Zoning: R - Existing Land Use: S n le Far~il DWellin 7. Proposed Zoninq: B - Proposed Land use: Office Space ~ / . Neibhborhood Conservation 1 ~~~/'_ 8. Comprehensive Plan Designation. ~~~ 9. Are Conditions Proffered With This Request? Yes No R If you are voluntarily offering proffers as a partoff thYe P annin ,~~~ Lion, these proffers must be in writing. A member staff can assist you in the preparation of these proffers.) 10. Value of Land and (Proposed) Buildings: ~ 63~1W.W il. The Following Items Must Be Submitted With This Application. Please Check If Enclosed. Application Will Not Be Accepted If Any Of These Items Are I+Iissing Or Incomplete: / Letter of Application / Concept Plan ~~ Metes and Bounds Description ~ List of Adjacent Owners of Property (Attach Exhibit A) ~ Vicinity Map / Application Fee Written Proffers ~_ Water and Sewer Application (If Applicable) 12. Signature Of Property Owner, Contract Purchaser, Or Owner's Agent: Date 2.O ~ ° ~~. Signature ~.. ~~ -~~;'~== ~-3 Date Rec. s 5'0 _ Received Bys ~a Case No.: Ord. No.: ROANOI~ COUNTY LAND USB PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATION 1. Owner's Name: Irvin warren Simpson Phone: 361-191+ Address : 5 ~0~t Malvern Rd . a NW 2 . Applicant's Name: Irisin warren Simpson -Phone: 361-191 ~+ Address: ~,f0~+ Mai vern Rd. NNW Roanoke, Ya. 240i ~ 3 Location of Property: tii0~+ Malvern Rd. ~ NW . Tax Map Number (s) : '~8.1 ~+ - 1 - 61 4 isterial District: 1L~~ ~ i ns Ma . g 5 Size of Property: 141' X 110 ' . 6 Existing Zoning: R 1 . Existing Land Uses: Sin=le Fam~il~ Dute~ ~ inE 8 Existing Comprehensive Plan Designation: Neighborhood Conservation . 9. Proposed Comprehensive Plan Designation: Transition 10. The Following Items Must Be Submitted With This Application. Please Check If 8nclosed. Application Will Not Be Accepted If Any Of These Items Are Kissing Or Incomplete. Letter of Application Vicinity Map Statement of Justification (Please complete below.) Application Fee List of Adjacent Owners Please explain, in detail, how this request conforms to the Land Use Determinants of the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan: Irvin Warren Sispson 5 jp~ Malvern Road, I1W Roanoke, 1Tir6inia 2~r{~12 January 20~199~ County of Roanoke Depa~ctment of Plannin6 and Zonin6 PO Box 29~~ Roanoke, Yir6inia 2+01 ~-'079h Attentions Jonathan W. Hartley, Planner Dear Mr. Hartley; I would like to request a change in Zonlnb for the attached property iron n - 1 to B `' 1 • Since buying this house Tor sy residence in 19'/'+, Wore businesses have noved into the area. With the Williasson Road Cruisin6 problem tthis is no lon6er a desireable location for a dwellin6. Re2onin6 to B - 1 would enhance the value of this property. It's visibility iron, and~e proxinfty to Willie=son Road could enhance its use. zonin6 change would enable ~e to sell this property couercially. Thank you for the help and consideration that yon have Given se inac~d batphone at 362t29141oro9'!'/t223~is needed I can be,,re y ~3 Yours truly, Irvin Warren Simpson ~3Cr+ Malvern Road, Nw Roanoke, Vlrginia 2+012 Attachnentst 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Rezoning Application Map of Area f let Map Metes and Bounds Sewerage Application List of Adjacent Owners Concept P1am Attachment 2 . G-3 Location Map Attachment 3 /'~ Vi' i BOXL E Y PROPE~QT Y ~~ Mai. _ IL• ~ - - - - t/.d7 - - Sf.7f - - - ~i~ - - - ~O~ - - ~1•.l~F' - ~ ~• u /~~ i ~ a ~c ~ ~ • ;~~ N 0 ~ e N3 ~~ 0 /L.~ ~ ' i ~ !tits ~ ~ 0 ~ ~~~ ~_ ~-~y,-'~= - ~A" s~ f~1' h~'' O ~- 1 e%i1 ~''~, j ` ~~ ~ ~-~ if O i0 ie '~ ' -scut t /~ VEN!!E ~' o ~ RAYMOND 1. S~ o ~ff.H N•„f3'f4'E- tff.~?'/i+il.I itz.:0 _ ~ 1 I:ie 1 1 %roaa ~ s ~~ 1 1 ~vstra=.c~' S~ ~ ~ 1 ~ v ~ ~i ~` ~ ~ ~ M3~ ~ I o I IO ~ ~ tie ' ~ I ~ ~ ns• ~ o ~ ~ ~~s v ~~ / ~ b ~ JIr ~ ~ 1 ti !- 0 ~ b - .e , h ~, ~ s~ ti ~, ... cw~L7 ~ 1 1 ~ ~ r ~ ~ "1 1 " ~'~s ~ ~$ ~ 1 ¢ ~ ~ i IIO.O r 0 O ~ ~i /290/ ; ; iy3 1 W 'VAS `f~ . ~ 3 0 /f ~ noo v .~ ~ ~ ~ `y 0 ' It0.0 ~ ~ O Q~ ~ v ~ ~ ~ ~ r r~~ • 1~ '~ _~~ Z ~ ~ 1 ~ o N ?O~ ~ _ e'~ ~I /23.0 ' ~ ~ 00'E.- ~l • ~ ~ / 4Oj , ~ w s SAS ~ ~ r y ~ in2Nw /! .A - ~ ~ NELMS ~ssrgw-• LANE ~-.~_ _ "~ ~ -- --~.,,;,,or --~ . N:~~ ~' OR. AR N PROP RTY J~, • taiair' • Piat flap _ Attachment ~~-3 .. i ~ s~ l I Cnwrw lwr _ I I 1 I I a ~ v OO Y Q ~r I I Z I I ~ I I~ Y I i ~ ~ I ~ io I I N v c.,-~. ~ •i. Gw~. Nrt. Otir~ Otnt -n _ --~~E~-- c., [,... ~ ... • f I !/ ~~ ` o 4 ~ R• _ fl_! ---- -- i ~ ~ ~4C Q J i _ ~ o `M~r JA • ~.0 RA~. • ~'.~ • I .fie. • !1. N • c.... ~ Mw ~ ~~ n ~' N• LA~~ ~~~ X19 ~ ~w~/ ~ ~ ~.~,, R` •~'~ a~ ~M~ .~~`''r LEORL REFEEE~t/CE t Q/OjE ~ rivs dr//seJ PR~~rtJj /~ ~4(rr L.ewfrp /~ A Pa.y /l.+.r ! Pi. r0 .J~seMa f••w ~L.sw Raw .Er gr~w.yin •j• iTw dtO'K7"'7' ~0- Ai(r.ti.~vt AMr ~~/ G~ws4w.wf: ~1~, t~,ertr f+rR sac ~ ass /Q,1~/N N! 8/MP~ON sf ~~~ / w~/o Iorlw *!' c~~ r, mc~err s, rrs/. Mwr ~ M.~crs~ti/ Nicw ~ v ~Pa.No~rE Co~,~,-r, /Ra,~/.~ ~~ ~'~f L E , ~ ••• ld • MddCyl/ ~ /~ / J 0 Attachment # 5 ROAl1i0RE COpNTY OTILIT? DEPARTMBNT APPLICATION FOR WATER OR SEWER SERVICE TO PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Date 1 /~0/yU G _3 Name of Applicant ruin Warren Si..pson Phone 36~-~y1~+ Address of Applicant 504 Malvern Rd., NW _ Name of Developer Phone Address of Developer Name of Design Engineer Phone Address of Design Engineer Name of Contact Person Name of Proposed Development Type of Development and proposed number of units (Be specific) EXISTING Changing froffi Dwelling to Office Spaee Location of proposed development (Furnish copy of map) Size of proposed development in acres: Acres Give minimum and maximum elevation (Use USGS Elevations) at which the individual water/sewer service connections would be located:' Minimum feet MSL. Maximum feet MSL Is this application for a development that will be a part or section of a larger future development? No Yes If yes, provide map of entire area if available. (OVER) 9 /' /~,~...~.-s^ - Signature of Applicant Date Rec.: VVV Received By : ____~ Case No.: • Ord: No.: ROANOKE COUNTY REZONING APPLICATION 1. Owner's Name: Marx EI izabeth Radford and Frank Radford _ _ Phone: 343-5000 Address: 2740 Franklin Road S.W., Suite 3, Roanoke, Virginia 24014 Hop In Food Stores, Inc. phone: 774-1197 2 . Applicant's Name : c /o Edwa rd A Nett Esquire Address: 1919 Electric Road S.W. Roanoke Vir inia 24018 3. Location of Property: Northeast intersection of Peters Creek Road and Woodhaven DrivE Tax Map Number(s) : No. 2 -4- 4. Magisterial District: Ho n 5. Size of Property: 2 8 ace re or less 6. Existing Zoning: B-2 wi h onditions existi Existing Land Use: Corrrnercial 7. ' Proposed Zoning: B-2 wi h coed i t i ons r Proposed Land Use: r i 8 . Comprehensive Plan Designation: transition 9. Are Conditions Proffered With This Request? Yes xx No_ (If you are voluntarily offering proffer's as a part of your applica- planning tion, thesassistf ou in the pneparationgof Staff can y these proffers) 10. Value of Land and (Proposed) Buildings: X505 200 00 - 11. The Following Items Must Be Submitted With lication Will Not Be A d l This Application. Please Accepted If Any Of These pp ose . Check If Enc Items Are Kissing Or Incomplete: x Letter of Application x d Bounds Description x Concept Plan List of Adjacent Owners Metes an of Property (Attach Exhibit A) ~ Vicinity Map. Written Proffers lication Fee _ x App '- Water and Sewer Application If Applicable) 12. Signature of Property Owner, Contract Purchaser, Or Owner's Agent: ~_© ~ Signature Date =~ ' AN z 18 '.~50.~ 88 aEa0U1CENTEMN~'`' A Quwi/ulBagieains PAUL M. MAHONEY CfltJNTY ATTORNEY ~D1IYltIJ of 'S~DFIIID~iP .... ~ . . :, ~ , . . OFFICE OF THE COUNTY A~bRN,~f~. ~ • :~ ,. . ,,,... ~~t` .~ ,~ 30 January 1990 JAN ~% lggp Edward A. Natt, Esquire Osterhoudt, Ferguson, Natt, P. O. Box 20068 Roanoke, VA 24018 is "' 1 K-~rt~ACm '~I~~, 1979 1989 .ios~ e. oeeNSwuN S[lIIOR AS51$TANT OOlJ1~ITY ATTORNEY Pl~l-'~~!lliF, 20~IiFiG 6 GitAM't~ ~OAMOKE fAU~lTY v~ac~ L. ~u~MAN Aheron &i..Agee AssisTANT COUNTY ATTOaNEY Re: Appeal of Zoning Administrator's Decision Interpretation of Proffered Conditions Dear Ed: On January 23, 1990, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, upheld the Zoning Administrator's interpretation of certain proffered conditions concerning the size of signaqe for Hop-In stores located at the corner of Glen Heather Drive and Route 419 and the corner of Peters Creek Road and Wood Haven Drive. You have advised me that it is your client's intention to . proceed with a request to amend the proffered conditions concerning signaqe for these two developments. In pursuing these administra- tive remedies, however, you desire to retain the opportunity to appeal the January 23 decision of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, to the Circuit Court pursuant to the provisions of Article 8, Chapter 11 of Title 15.1 of the State Code. Therefore on behalf of the County, this office agrees to toll the running of the thirty day requirement for filing an appeal with the Circuit Court so long as your client proceeds in good faith to amend the proffered conditions. The time period for filing an appeal shall commence. upon the date that the Board of Supervisors renders a decision upon your client's request to amend the proffered conditions concerning signaqe for the two develop- ments in question. You have further advised me that you will file on behalf of your client a petition to amend the proffered conditions concerning signaqe for these two developments on or before February 1, 1990. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, ~~~~ Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney f _ PNIIri/ sq -- cc: '~Mr. Terry HarringtorY P.O. BOX 29800 • ROANOKE COUNTY. VIRGINIA 24016-0796 • (703) 772-2007 l~ LAW OFFICES • - - y OSTERHOUDT, FERGUSON, NATT, AHERON 8 AGES A ry~pFES310NA1 CORPORNION 1919 ELECTRIC ROAD. 3. r. P, Q, !OX 200bB TCIEPM ON[ CM ARL(f N OST[RMOUOT 70~'»~"~~» MICNA[~ 3. rEROU3oN ROANOKE, VIRG1NfA COWARD A. NATT 24OIS FAX NO. MIC NA[l J. AN[RON 70~~T7•-Orel O~3T[V[N AO[[ MARK O~ RIDD January 26, 1990 The Board of Supervisors for Roanoke County 3738 Brambleton Avenue, S.W. Roanoke, Virginia 24018 Re: Hop In Food Stores, Inc. -- Rezoning Intersection of Peters Creek Road and Woodhaven Drive Gentlemen: Enclosed please find an application which I would appreciate your filing requesting a change in the proffered conditions for the above-described property situated at the intersection of Peters Creek Road and Woodhaven Drive in the County of Roanoke. As you know, the applicant appeared before the Board of Supervisors on January 23, 1990, requesting that you overrule the decision of the Zoning Administrator relating to his interpretation of the sign ordinance as applicable to this property. As Mr. Eddy stated at that meeting, this matter could be handled through a request for an amendment of proffers. Therefore, please consider this a formal request for an amendment of proffers on the above project. We would request that the proffers on the signage be amended to provide that the sixty square feet set out in the proffer 2(d) of the Final Order of Zoning of April 8, 1988, be amended to state that the sixty square feet relate to the sign on the pole located as an identification sign adjacent to the right-of-way of Peters Creek Road and Woodhaven Drive. We would further request that the proffer be amended to provide that an identification sign be permitted to be placed on the Hop In building and an identification sign be permitted to be placed upon the adjacent premises. We would request that the sign on the Hop In building be designated as fifty-five square feet and the sign on the adjoining premises be set at thirty five square feet. The srgns would be attached to the building. In fact, the Hop In sign is already located on the building at the present time.. Enclosedplease find a copy of a plan showing the size of the sign on G -4 ' Peters Creek Road, as well as the size of the sign to be located on the Hop In building. Respectfully submitted, OSTERHOUIJT, FERGUSON, NATT, AHERON & AGES, P.C. ~ n.~- Edward A. Natt mp Enclosure Copy Frank Radford Peter Surprenant :A . n./ Irk, /~ 4~ i v i' 'u CIO T•~~ ']11. `~7 NI r Lam? ~ .~N''dr? • .. I+o~yJfylrv~~ r~l nci~T~.lf~l • ._ - ~._::: ~ ti - -- i /~ t i i • ~ i t i I ~ I ,~ y,~, : r'~D _ ~r14 i ~ '~ i ; ~1hO ri/Wr- f _ ••i~ «O r -1~ 1 j ~, i i ~N I e` _ N 0 ~ ~` N G-'I ~__~~ 7 I I I j i of r ~ ~J ~ Z~ ~ o ~ ~ e! - _ ~' '`~ ~ ~ ~ _ ~`~~~ v~i t I `y I ~ , •~ I LL T ~ L > •_i S ti- < I a ? _ r. i 4 ~ ~ z o ~ r ~ ~., f ~ Z ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~QQ ~ c ? s' J ~ ~. TL -~ i ~ ~~: s `Z ~ '_ :~ M ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ -~ ~ Si o H O ~ ~i ~O _~ !~ ,1 ~~ 2 _ , ~\ /^` I I .-=J ! i \ ~,,, ~~~ 7~ ~`` ~^ \~ ~ 1 ~ `e~ ~~~r,~~ ~il ~-~ ( l-t "~ ~G) n, ~~ ~~i ,.r ~, ° ~ h .- 1 4 a , ... 1 ~ V ` l 1 J s i v y J t ~ ~ ;~ ~ W 2 -"' H ~ _ 11~ _ Z }~ Z ~Y i Y J ~ ~ i ~ a a t .~ ~ m ~ v uate Rec.: ~! ~ Received By: Case No.: _ Ord. No.: - ROANOIKE COUNTY REZONING APPLICATION 1. Owner's Name: Mary EI i zabeth and Frank Radford phone; 343-5000 Address: 2740 Franklin Road, S.W., Suite 3, Roanoke, Virginia 24014 Hop-In Food Stores, Inc. 2. Applicant's Name: c_/o Edward A. Natt, Esquire Phone: 774-1197 Address: 1919 Electric Road, S.W., Roanoke, Virginia 24018 3. Location of Property: Northeast corner of Glen Heather Drive and Route 419 Tax Map Number(s) : No. 76.07-02-52 __ _ 4. Magisterial District: Windsor Hi I is _ 5. Size of Property: 0.06764 acres 6. Existing Zoning: B-2 with proffers existirx; _ Existing Land Use: Camnerc i a i 7 . Proposed Zoning: B-2 with prof fers ~ Proposed Land Use: Cam~erc i a I 8. Comprehensive Plan Designation: transition 9. Are Conditions Proffered With This Request? Yes xx No (If you are voluntarily offering proffers as a part of your applica- tion, these proffers must be in siting. a member of the Planning Staff can assist you 3n the preparation of these proffers.) 10. Value of Land and (Proposed) Buildings: #247,700.00 11. The Following Items >Kust Be Submitted With This Application. Please Check If Enclosed. Application will Not Be Accepted If Any Of These Items Are Kissing Or Incomplete: x Letter of Application _~ Concept Plan Metes and Bounds Description _~,_ List of Adjacent Owners of Property (Attach Exhibit A) Vicinity Map x Application Fee Written Proffers Water and Sewer Application (If Applicable) 12. Signature Of Property Owner, Contract Purchaser, Or Owner's A ent: Signature Date ~ 2 6 Q l7 ~- LAW OFFICES OSTERHOUDT, FERGUSON, NATT, AHERON 8 AGEE A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION CNAI~L[f N OfT[RMO~JOT M ICHA[l f ~[PIOU60N [OWA110 A. NAfT MICNA[l J~ AN[110N O. •T[V[N AO[[ MA11K O~ ItIDO The Board of Supervisors 3738 Brambleton Avenue, Roanoke, Virginia 24018 Gentlemen: 1919 ELECTRIC ROAD. S. p. P. O. bOJ( 20084 T[L[PNON[ ROANOKE, VIRGINIA Boa-~s.-~ifT 24018 -Ax No. 70a- 774-Of 6~ January 26, 1990 for Roanoke County S.W. Re: Hop In Food Stores, Inc. -Rezoning Intersection of Glen Heather Drive and Route 419 Enclosed please find an application which I would appreciate your filing requesting a change in the proffered conditions for the above-descn'bed property situated at the northeast corner of the intersection of Glen Heather Drive and Route 419 in the County of Roanoke. As you know, the applicant appeared before the Board of Supervisors on January 23, 1990, requesting that you overrule the decision of the Zoning Administrator relating to his interpretation of the sign ordinance as applicable to this property. As Mr. Eddy stated at that meeting, this matter could be handled through a request for an amendment of proffers. Therefore, please consider this a formal request for an amendment of proffers on the above project. We would request that the proffers on the signage an the above property be amended to provide that the thirty square feet set out in the proffer (4) of the Final Order of Zoning of December 9, 1988, be amended to provide that the signage shall not exceed thirty square feet on the free standing sign to be placed near the intersection of Route 419 and Glen Heather Drive. In addition, we are requesting that an identification sign in a size not to exceed fifty five square feet be permitted to be placed upon the building. A plan is enclosed depicting the size and configuration of the permitted to be sign. Respectfully submitted, OSTERHOUDT, FERGUSON, NATT, AHERON &AGEE, P.C. ~~i~~ Edward A. Natt mp Enclosure Copy Frank Radford Peter Surprenant ACTION NO. ITEM NO. I""~ "' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: February 27, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: Ordinance authorizing the acquisition of easements for a water line project, Bonsack Industrial Park COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Board of Supervisors has given approval to proceed with the Tweeds Water Line Project. The alignment of the water lines has been changed requiring acquisition of two additional easements. The easements required are on the following property located within Botetourt County. The following is a list of properties involved: Botetourt Tax Map Propert y Owner Acquisition #112(2) B Frances H. Crumpacker, et als Easement #112(2) C Cicero H. Hall Jr. and Easement Doris B. Hall Staff would recomm end that cost of acquisition for f l easements not roperty. the exceed forty (40$) percent ue o of the assessed va p ALTERNATIVES AND IMPACTS: The cost of easement acquisition is estimated not to exceed $2,000 and will be part of the water line project. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board conduct the first reading of an ordinance authorizing acquisition of easements at a cost not to exceed forty (40$) percent of the assessed value. Respectfully submitted, Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney H- Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Action Motion by Eddy Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers Vote No Yes Abs C I" AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 27, 1990 ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION OF EASEMENTS FOR A WATER LINE PROJECT, BONSACK INDUSTRIAL PARK BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading concerning the acquisition of easements for the Bonsack Industrial Park water line project was held on February 27, 1990. A second reading on this matter was held on March 13, 1990. 2. That these easement acquisitions are for a water line project in the area of the Bonsack Industrial Park on the Botetourt/Roanoke County line. This water line project will provide necessary utility service to this economic development project and the surrounding area. 3. That the properties to be acquired are identified as follows: Botetourt Tax Man Property Owner Acquisition #112(2) B Frances H. Crumpacker, et als Easement #112(2) C Cicero H. Hall Jr. and Easement Doris B. Hall 4. That the consideration for the acquisition of the easements for the water line project shall not exceed forty (40$) percent of the assessment value of the property. 5. That the County Administrator is authorized to execute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County as are necessary to accomplish the conveyance of said property, all N-I of which shall be upon form approved by the County Attorney. ACTION NUMBER ITEM NUMBER- ' ~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: February 27, 1990 SUBJECT: Appointments to Committees, Commissions and Boards COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: 1 Community Corrections Resources Board One-year term of Edmund J. Kielty, Alternate. His term expired August 13, 1988. One-year term of Bernard Hairston expired August 13, 1989. 2 Leaaue of Older Americans One-year term of Webb Johnson will expire 3/31/90. 3 Landfill Citizens Advisory Committee Carl L. Wright, representative from the Cave Spring Magisterial District has resigned and another representative should be appointed. 4 Transportation and Safety Commission Four-year terms of Arnold Struson, Medical Representative and Jackie Talevi, Legal Representative will expire 3/1/90. SUBMITTED BY: !2') ~.~.~ ~ ' Mary H. Allen Clerk to the Board APPROV BY: Elmer C. H dge County Administrator K~-`~ ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Eddy Denied ( ) Johnson Received ( ) McGraw Referred ( ) Nickens To ( ) Robers AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE O~OKE OCOUNTY RADMINISTRATION OCENTER COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HON TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 27, 1990 RESOLUTION 227_ 90-4 APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTHA OFOR TH SO DATE DESIGNATEDOAS AGEND ITEM L - CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1, that the certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for February 27, 1990 designated as Item L - Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 4, inclusive, as follows: 1, Approval of Minutes - July 11, 1989 2, Request from Bent Mountain Women's Club to use the Old Bent Mountain Fire Station. 3, Confirmation of Committee Appointments to the Grievance Panel, Health Department Board of Directors, and Parks and Recreation Advisory Committee. 4, Approval of Raffle Permit - Roanoke County School Food Service Chapter. 2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this resolution. Item 1 approved on motion of Supervisor Johnson, carried by the following recorded vote: Supervisors McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers AYES: NAYS: None ABSTAIN: Supervisor Eddy Items 2 - 4 approved on motion of Supervisor Johnson and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES• Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None YYt~~1 ~~ - Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors 2/28/90 CC: File John Willey, Real Estate Assessments Paul Mahoney, County Attorney -l July 11, 1989 Q~ 1 Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Roanoke County Administration Center 3738 Brambleton Avenue, SW Roanoke, Virginia 24018 July 11, 1989 The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, met this day at the Roanoke County Administration Center, this being the second Tuesday, and the first regularly scheduled meeting of the month of July, 1989. IN RE: CALL TO ORDER Chairman Garrett called the meeting to order at 3:00 p.m. The roll call was taken. MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Lee Garrett, Vice Chairman Richard Robers, Supervisors Bob L. Johnson, Steven A. McGraw, Harry C. Nickens arrived at 3:05 p.m. MEMBERS ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: Elmer C. Hodge, County Adr~~inistrator; John M. Chambliss, Assistant County July 11, 1989 O V continued throughout the storm. Mr. Smith continued that they have made arrangements for refuse pickup to take the refuse from communities involved during normal operations. Mr. Hodge gave a report prepared by Director of Engineering, Phillip Henry, concerning the activities of the drainage staff. Mr. Hodge commended the staff, as well as fire and rescue people, and everyone who worked that night, for an outstanding job. Chairman Garrett expressed congratulations on behalf of the Board to all those involved for their performance during this trying time and was very pleased that the problems were minimal. 1. Re est for a royal to im lement an Affirmative Action Plan. Mr. Hodge explained this was a first draft of the Affirmative Action Plan and recognized Mary Hicks and Keith Cook for their research and efforts. He advised he would like implementation to be coordinated through his office and that an Affirmative Action Committee be established to work with Human Resources. Although we have no legal requirement to do so, Mr. Cook felt this would complement the present EEOC policy in place at Roanoke County. Mr. Cook reported that the plan was written by Mary Hicks, County Administrator's Office and he recognized Angela Lucento, an intern from Radford University, who helped with the technical aspects of the plan. The plan was also July 11, 1989 ~ ~ 5 Parks & Recreation Coordinator, Kathy Davis, was present to answer questions about the report. Questions raised by Supervisor Nickens included the reason for the additional compensation for the author of the history book, Deedie Kagey; and staff recommendation that $20,000 remaining be used for special activities. Mr. Hodge advised that there are two categories of funds. The first is the $40,000 which were funds raised by the volunteers in fund raising campaigns and were not really county dollars. The fund raising committee and sesquicentennial committee had recommended using the remaining funds in this manner. Although Deedie Kagey was compensated for writing the history book, the additional compensation from the funds was a recognition of the long hours and hard work she put into the book. The other category was $20,000 remaining from the County's contribution to the sesquicentennial which was not needed.. It would be staff's intent to use these funds for an event to celebrate the All America City Award that Roanoke County recently won in Chicago, and it was anticipated that there would be no funds remaining. Supervisor Nickens was concerned that if we allocate $20,000 for special events highlighting the All America City Award, there will be no funds left for special events sponsored by the Parks & Recreation. Mr. Hodge advised that these are two different accounts. Ms. Davis advised that the $20,000 County July 11, 1989 0 Q --- - - __~ - -- ---- - - -- ------- ------ - delivery, CHIP Program, JLARC funding, and status report on AIDS in Roanoke County. 5. Acceptance of a S5.000 matching grant_from the Commission for the Arts for cultural enrichment _organizations. A-71189-2 Director of Management & Budget Reta Busher requested that the Board approve the $5,000 Arts Challenge Grant, which with the previous approved $20,000, would allocate $25,000 to cultural organizations in fiscal year 1989-90. The allocation would be $5,000 to Arts Council of Roanoke Valley, $15,000 to Center in the Square, and $5,000 to the Roanoke Symphony. Supervisor Robers moved to approve staff recommendation. The motion was seconded by Supervisor McGraw and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None 6. Authorization for the County Administrator to execute an o tion a reement for 200 acres of real estate. A-71189-3 County Attorney Paul Mahoney advised that the County has received an offer to enter into an option agreement, for a six month period, to purchase approximately 200 acres from Mary E. Moore, for $3,750.00. Because this property is adjacent to the proposed Smith Gap Landfill site, it could be utilized as a 00 4 July 11, 1989 --- -- - -_ __ __ - ._ __, Twenty-Third Judicial District, has requested the establis men of this program. This program will be operated through the Roanoke Valley Alcohol Safety Action Program. It will be entirely self-supported and operated from funds collected as fees from participants. There was no discussion. Supervisor Nickens moved to approve first reading of the ordinance. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Robers, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisor Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None 2. Ordinance vacatin a 25-foot unim roved ri ht-of- wa known as Jones Street Section 1 Dwi ht Hills. Director of Development & Inspections Arnold Covey advised that Charles M. and Mary H. Vandergrift are requesting this vacation in order that they may improve their property The Department of Engineering and Utility have no objections upon the condition that a 20 foot water/sewer easement be retained. Supervisor Nickens moved to approve first reading of the ordinance. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Johnson and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None 3. Ordinance authorizing purchase of drainage July 11, 1989 -- -----_ - - - -- ------ - the 11-89, seconded by Supervisor Garrett, and carried by following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisor Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None ORDINANCE 0-71189-4 AUTHORIZING PURCHASE OF A DRAINAGE EASEMENT AT 942 STARMOUNT AVENUE, ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, AND THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF AN UNDERGROUND STORM DRAIN WHEREAS, a 10-foot drainage was thought to have been conveyed by developers to Roanoke County across the eastern edge of Lot 1, Block 4, Section 2, of Deer Run Estates in 1979 or 1980 for purposes of providing storm water drainage from lots in Block 1, Section 1 of Deer Run Estates to an existing drainage easement along the southern edge of said Lot 1; and WHEREAS, no evidence of such easement can be found entered of record in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia; and WHEREAS, the construction of a storm drain under Starmount Avenue which terminates in an 18-inch pipe opening upon said Lot 1 results in the discharge of water and debris collected from numerous lots upon the property of this lot's owner; and WHEREAS, the owner of said lot has a legal claim for the taking of his property for public uses without just compensation and has presented a claim, through counsel, for damage to his property occasioned by such drainage where no public easement exists. July 11, 1989 __ NAYS: None 01 3 IN RE: SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES ~ Ordinance authorizing the conveyance of 2b.742 acres of real estate (North Lakes Property) to the Roanoke County School Board. The report was presented by Mr. Mahoney. There was no discussion, and no citizens were present to speak on this ordinance. Supervisor Nickens moved to adopt the ordinance. The motion was seconded by Supervisor McGraw and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None ORDINANCE 0-71189-5 AUTHORIZING THE CONVEYANCE OF 26.742 ACRES OF REAL ESTATE (NORTH LAKES PROPERTY) TO THE ROANOKE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.01 of the Charter of Roanoke County, the subject property is being made available for other public uses by conveyance to the Roanoke County School Board. 2. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading on this ordinance was held on June 27, 1989; .and a second reading was held on July 11, 1989, concerning the conveyance of 26.742 acres of real estate, more or less, identified as tax map parcel number July, 11, 1989 _,O 1.5 . ___ adjacent property owners before execution of the deed of this conveyance to the State of Virginia. Supervisor Nickens moved to adopt the ordinance. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Robers and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None ORDINANCE 0-71189-6 AUTHORIZING THE ACCEPTANCE AND ACQUISITION OF 6 ACRES OF REAL ESTATE (SOUTHVIEW) FROM THE ROANOKE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD, AND FURTHER, AUTHORIZING THE CONVEYANCE OF 2.281 ACRES, BEING A PORTION THEREOF, TO THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA BE ZT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter, the acquisition and disposition of real estate can be authorized only by ordinance. A first reading on this ordinance was held on June 27, 1989; and a second reading was held on July 11, 1989. 2. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.01 of the Charter of Roanoke County, a portion of the subject real estate is being made available to the Commonwealth of Virginia for other public uses, namely, the State Forensics Laboratory. 3. That the acceptance and acquisition of six (6) acres of real estate from the Roanoke County School Board is hereby authorized. July 11, 1989 0 _ __ __-. _ -- - --- _- --- - asked for board support. He asked for concurrence to researc the possibility of allocating surplus 1988-89 funds to overtime enforcement of Williamson Rd. He advised he will have a report available for next meeting from VDOT on ingress and egress. (2) Supervisor Johnson directed staff to investigate expanding drainage program. SUPERVISOR ROBERS: (1) Expressed appreciation to County staff for success of the sewer line program. (2) Announced that Dewberry & Davis from Northern Virginia will definitely relocate in Valleypointe. SUPERVISOR NICKENS: Expressed concern about piece meal allocation of funds for variety of projects after the budget is approved. SUPERVISOR MCGRAW: (1) Thanked staff for their work in Montclair area during flooding. (2) Advised that he will be attending meetings of the Grayson Commission and NACo Conference during next week. (3) He described a new development planned for Catawba Valley, but felt that the County should prepare plans to retain the rural community in Catawba Valley. IN RE: CONSENT AGENDA Supervisor Nickens moved to approve the Consent Agenda. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Garrett and carried by the following recorded vote: July 11, 1989 0 i 9 IN RE: REPORTS Supervisor Nickens moved to receive and file the reports listed below. The motion was seconded by Supervisor and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None 1. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance 2. General Fund Unappropriated Balance 3. Board Contingency Fund 4. Statement of Expenditures and income analysis as of May 31, 1989. IN RE: EXECUTIVE SESSION At 4:35 p.m., Supervisor Garrett moved to go into Executive Session pursuant to the Code of Virginia Section 2.1- 344 A 7 to discuss probable litigation or specific legal matters concerning {a) Dixie Caverns Landfill (b) Hac~cterty, et al. v. Kavanaugh and (c) Consolidation. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Johnson and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None IN RE: CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE SESSION July 11, 1989 Q Z 2. Only such public business matters as were identified in the motion convening the executive meeting were heard, discussed or considered by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor Robers, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None IN RE: ADJOURNMENT' At b:05 p.m. Supervisor McGraw moved to adjourn. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Nickens and carried by a unanimous voice vote. Lee Garrett, Chairman ACTION NO. A-22790-4.a ITEM NO . ~ "" AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: February 27, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: Authorization to allow the Bent Mountain Fire Station to be used by a civic organization COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR' S COMMENTS : ,,,~/,.0~,.,,~,,,~.~ SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Bent Mountain Woman's Club has requested permission to utilize the old Bent Mountain Fire Station for the purpose of conducting a yard sale and bake sale from May 17 through May 21, 1990. The organization has agreed to be responsible for any damage to the property as a result of these activities. In addition, the organization has agreed to execute a waiver releasing Roanoke County from any injuries or damages to persons and property as a result of these stated activities. FISCAL IMPACTS• None. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff makes the following recommendations: 1. That the Board authorize the County Administrator to execute such documents to accomplish this transaction on forms approved by the County Attorney. 2. That the Board favorably consider this authorization by resolution under the consent agenda. Respectfully submitted, `~ Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney ~~ Approved (X) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Action Vote No Yes Abs Motion by Rc~h T._ .Tc~hnsnn Eddy x Johnson x McGraw x Nickens x Robers x cc: File Paul Mahoney, County Attorney Tommy Fuqua, Chief, Fire & Rescue ACTION N0. A-22790-4.b ITEM NUMBER - L AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE EKE COUNTY UADMINISTRATIONRCENTER COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROAN MEETING DATE: February 27, 1990 Confirmation of Committee Appointments to the AGENDA ITEM: Health Department Board of Grievance Panel, Directors and Parks and Recreation Commission. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION nominations were made at the February 13, 1990 The Following meeting and must now be confirmed. Grievance Panel has nominated Kenneth Lussen to a two-year term, Supervisor Eddy 1992. expiring February 23, Health De artment Board of Directors has nominated Anne Renner to a two-year term, Supervisor Eddy expiring November 26, 1991. Parks and Recreation Advisor Commission Supervisor Johnson has nominated Karen Padgett to a three-year term expiring June 30, 1992. submitted, Approved by, Respectfully ~ r ,~J ~~1c~~ ~ Elmer f-C{.~t'Hodge Mary H. Allen County Administrator ---- Clerk to the Board -------------- ___ ----------------- VOTE -- ACTION No yes Abs Approved (x) Motion by: Bob L Johnson Eddy x Denied ( ) Johnson x Received ( ) McGraw x Referred ( ) Nickens x To ( ) Robers x cc: File Grievance Panel File Health Department Board of Directors File Parks & Recreation Advisory Commission File ACTION N0. A-22790-4.c ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: February 27, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: Request for approval of a Raffle Permit from the Roanoke County School Food Service Chapter COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Roanoke County School Food Service Chapter has requested a Raffle Permit to be held on May 4, 1990. This application has been reviewed by the Commissioner of Revenue and he recommends that it be approved. The application is on file in the Clerk's Office. The organization has paid the $25.00 fee. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the application for a Raffle Permit be approved. SUBMITTED BY: yr-,cam, ~+ . Q~t,tz..-, APPROVED BY: ~.yu~r Mary H. Allen Elmer C. Hod e Clerk to the Board ----------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved (X) Motion by: Bob L. Johnson No Yes Abs Eddy x Denied ( ) Johnson x Received ( ) Referred ( ) McGraw x Nickens x To ( ) Robers x cc: File Bingo/Raffle Permit COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA COMMISSIONER OF THE REVENUE APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO CONDUCT RAFFLES OR BINGO Application is hereby made for a bin,.o game or raffle permit. This ,application is made subject to a~l County=and State laws, ordinances, rules, and regulations now in force, or that may be enacted hereaicantaandwwhichashallrbeydeemeddat~onditionuunder signed appl which this permit is issued. :~ All applicants should exercise extreme ca uest ons~re Bingo games cy of their responses to the following q and raffles are strictly regulated by Title 18.2-340.1 et. sTeg. of the criminal statutes of the Virginia Code, and by Section 4-86 et. seg. of the Roanoke•County Code. These laws authorize the County Board of Supervisors to conduct a reasonable investiga- tion prior to granting a bingo or raffle permit' The Board has sixty days from the filing of an application to grant or deny the permit. The Board maytOebe~inustrict compliancetwithPeounty and organization found not state law. .Any person violating county or state regulations concere son hwho permits shall be guilty of a Class 1 misdemeanor. Any p uses any part of the gross receipts from bingo or raffles for any purpose other than the lawful religious, charitable, community, or educational purposes for which the organization is specifi- cally organized, except for reasonable operating expenses, shall be guilty of a Class 6 felony. THIS APPLICATION IS FOR: RAFFLE PERMIT / Name of Organization Street Address (check one> BINGO GAMES C'f_.~~,7~eiL Mailing Address ~a~L e ~"~ City, State, Zip Code «~-/t`r~ ~f ~~~~'~ Purpose and Type of Organization f~,ov~escio~~aL ~.PoGt/>~i .SPA ~~fd When was the organization founded? ,:° -,/~i~~- 1 Roanoke County meeting place? ~, ,~ ~~~ ~~''~ Has organization been in existence in Roanoke County for two con- tinuous years? YES~_ NO Is the organization non-profit? YES~_ NO Indicate Federal Identification Number # ~~ D ld,~~S" ~~ ~ Attach copy of IRS Tax Exemption letter. Officers of the Organization: '/ resident: ,~o..is L,4r~ ~ sh ~' Vice-President ~Ll~ ~n~.~.d~ss P >/ Address: ~/3/ ./~R//>oLLa~ /~~l Address: ~5~.~ ~~ ~~~~ ~~/ / ~ Secretary :,~i3~ ~~/~L Treasurer : ~ d121J~ ~.~/' Address : ~ ~~ ~ ~~~i ~+~~~~~~ Address :.S"S~~ Odd ~~• ~~- Member authorized to be responsible for Raffle or Bingo opera- tions: Name /' / //~,C s~~.~ ~"i.e.~'~L~ Home^Address ~~/3 ~/~L% ~i~<<~ ~oA/1°/~~i `~ ~~o/f Phone. ~ Q~-lt//~ _Bus . Phone ~~~• ~~~~ A COMPLETE LIST OF THE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF CURRENT MEMBER- SHIP MUST BE FURNISHED WITH THIS APPLICATION. Specific location where Raffle or Bingo Game is to be conducted. RAFFLES: Date of Drawing A ~~ Time of Drawing_3~~~'! BINGO: Days of Week & Hours of Activity: Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday From To From To From To From To From To From To From To 2 State specifically how the proceeds from the $-~°rgcs/Raffle will be used. List in detail the planned or intended use of the proceeds. Use estimates amounts if necessary. ~~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~- ~~ ~~ I ~o+y~,r-v.. r ~ ~~ ` ~ ~f~ ~ ~~ ~c~-c~ ~~~~~ -~ .c~~~ ~~~ °° ~~~~ ~~'~ .~ 3 BINGO: Complete the following: Legal owner(s) of the building where BINGO is to be conducted: Name: Address: County State Zip Is the building owned by a 501-C non-profit organization? Seating capacity for each location: Parking spaces for each location: ALL RAFFLE AND BINGO APPLICANTS MUST ANSWER QUESTIONS 1 - 19 1. Gross receiInstant Bingo by calendarlguar eroforeprpora calenf Bingo games or dar year period. INSTANT BINGO BINGO 1st Quarter 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter 1st Quarter 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter Total Total 2. Does your organization understand that it is a violation of law to enter into a contract with any person or firm, associa- tion, organization, partnership, or corporation of any classifica- tion whatsoever, for the purpose of organizing, managing, or con- ducting Bingo Games or Raffles? ~QS 3. Does your organization understand that it must maintain and file complete records of receipts and disbursements pertaining to Bingo games and Raffles, and that such records are subject to audit by the Commissioner of the Revenue? ~f ~ s 4. Does your organization understand. that the Commissioner of the Revenue or his designee has the right to go upon the premises on which any organization is conducting a Bingo game or raffle, to perform unannounced audits, and to secure for audit all re- cords required to be maintained for Bingo games or raffles? 4 5. Does your organization understand that a Financial Report must be filed with the Commissioner of the Revenue on or before the first day of November of each calendar year for which a per- mit has been issued? 6. Does your organization understand that if gross receipts ex- ceed fifty thousand dollars during any calendar quarter, an addi- tional Financial Report must be filed for such quarter no later than sixty days following the last day of such quarter? 7. Does your organization understand that the failure to file financial reports when due shall cause automatic revocation of the permit, and no such organization shall conduct any Bingo game or raffle thereafter until such report is properly filed and a new permit is obtained? ~ fs_ 8. Does your organization understand that each Financial Report must be accompanied by a Certificate, verified under oath by the Board of Directors, that the proceeds of any Bingo game or raffle have been used for these lawful, religious, charitable, commu- nity, or educational purposes for which the organization is spe- cifically chartered or organized, and that the operation of Bingo games or raffles have been in accordance with the provisions of Article 1.1 of Chapter 8, Title 18.2 of the Code of Virginia? ~~?~ 9. Does your organization understand that a one percent audit fee of the gross receipts must be paid to the County of Roanoke upon submission of the annual financial report due on or before the first of November? 10. Does your organization understand that this permit is valid only in the County of Roanoke and only at such locations, and for such dates, as are designated in the permit application? 11. Does your organization understand that no person, except a bona fide member of any such organization who shall have been a member of such organization for at least ninety days prior to such participation, shall participate in the management, opera- tion, or conduct of any bingo game or raffle, and no person shall receive any remuneration for participating in management, operation, or conduct of any such game or raffle? _ 12. Has your organization attached a check for the annual permit fee in the amount of $25.00 payable to the County of Roanoke, Virginia? ~/~g 13. Does your organization understand that any organization found in violation of the County Bingo and Raffle Ordinance or §18.2- 340.10 of the Code of Virginia authorizing this permit is subject to having such permit revoked and any person, shareholder, agent, member or employee of such organization who violates the above to having such permit revoked and any person, shareholder, agent, member or employee of such organization who violates the above referenced Codes may be guilty of a felony?_~~C 5 14. Has your organization attached a complete list of its member- ship to this application form? ` S 15. Has your organization attached a copy of its bylaws to this application form? ` .- 16. Has the organization been declared exempt from property taxa- tion:under the Virginia Constitution or statutes?~-es If yes, state whether exemption is for real, per onal property, or both and identify exempt property. 17. State the specific type and purpose of the organization. ~-'r~a..~csssOn9L ~.~'~'ue~G, rte' -~-°~oc~ ~'2,crr.'CG c4~.n,U~'~~s 18. Is this organization incorporated in Virginia? ~d If yes, name and address of Registered Agent: ~19. Is the organization registered with the Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Affairs pursuant to the Charitable Solicitations Act, Section 57-48 of the Virginia Code? /'8 (If so, attach copy of registration.) Has the organization been granted an exemption from registration by the Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Affairs? ~ff (If so, attach copy of exemption.) ALL RAFFLE APPLICANTS DESCRIBE THE ARTICLES TO BE RAFFLED, VALUE OF SUCH ARTICLES, AND PROCEED TO NOTARIZATION. Article Description Fair Market Value 6 ALL BINGO APPLICANTS MUST ANSWER QUESTIONS 20 - 27 BEFORE NOTARIZATION RAFFLE APPLICANTS, GO TO NOTARIZATION. 20. Does ductedrmorezfrequen d y than two ahlendarodays inhany not be co calendar week? 21. Does your organization understand that it is required to keep completof rtherCode of VirginiaamandT§4S 98r of RoanokedCountyl Code 340.6 must include the following: a. A record of the date, quantity, and card value of instant bingo supplies purchased, as well as the name and address of the supplier of such instant bingo supplies, and written invoice or receipt is also required for each purchase of in- stant bingo supplies? b. A record in writing of the dates on which Bingo is played, the number of people in attendance on each date, and the amount of receipts and prizes on each day? (These records must be retained for three years.) c. A record of the name and address of each individual to whom a door prize, regular or special Bingo game prize or jackpot from the playing of Bingo is awarded? d. A complete and itemized record of all receipts and disburse- ments which support, and that agree with, the quarterly and annual reports required to be filed, and that these records must be maintained in reasonable order to permit audit? 22. Does your organization be conducted at such time as and only at such locations this application? 23. Does your organization understand that the gross receipts in the course of a reporting year from the playing of instant Bingo may not exceed 33 1/3$ of the gross receipts of an organization's Bingo operation? 24. Does your organization understand it may not sell an instant Bingo card to an individual below sixteen years of age? 25. Does your organization understand that an organization whose gross receipts from all bingo operations that exceed or are ex- pected to exceed $75,000 in any calendar year shall have been granted tax-exempt status pursuant to Section 501 C of the United States Internal Revenue Service? (Certificate must be attached.) understand that instant Bingo may only regular Bingo game is in progress, and at such times as are specified in 7 26. Does your organization understand that a Certificate of Occu- pancy must be obtained or be on file which authorizes this use at the proposed location? 27. Does your organization understand that awards or prize money or merchandise valued in excess of the following amounts are illegal? a. No door prize shall exceed twenty-five dollars. b. No regular Bingo or special Bingo game shall exceed One Hund- red dollars. c. No jackpot of any nature whatsoever shall exceed One Thousand Dollars, nor shall the total amount of jackpot prizes awarded in any one calendar day exceed One Thousand Dollars. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * NOTARIZATION: THE FOLLOWING OATH MUST BE TAKEN BY ALL APPLICANTS I hereby swear or affirm under the penalties of perjury as set forth in §18.2 of the Code of Virginia, that all of the above statements are true to the best of my knowledge, information, and beliefs. All questions have been answered. Signed by: ;game Home Address ~ this day o 19.14__ Tit Subscribed and sworn before me, My comir~ission expires: 19~ RETURN THIS COMPLETED APPLICATION T0: ota Public COMMISSIONER OF THE REVENUE P.O. Box 20409 Roanoke, VA 24018-0513 8 NOT VALID UNLESS COUNTERSIGNED The above application, having and issued to the applicant to this .calendar year. ~ ~~~ 9~ Date been found in due form, is approved have effect until December 31st of Commis Toner of he R venue The above application is not approved. Date Commissioner of the Revenue 9 I, ,I .; ,,. • I:II III '~: ,.I I1 __ 1 i !~,I fit... : 1 I I I , ,1 i'1L.,... ,. . I ... \i .1 ~ t.. 1 t..~ li 1`U fi I:.:.4....1_..4::. i 1.:11 :. !-~~ 1 ~r . I l , j' 1 i' •, :. 1. aI i 1:1::.1 h I ...1 "' .. I 111 ,I. .. I , ':; ~ > _. l ii I I I I:. 1' ~; I I ii-i i' jil._ 1 11 a ;_. 1 ...f ~_ 1 ." .... ,..i,~L_ I-i, ,. C~lf+ i ' t.`Ir 11 II I ~~, _. L.il 4 ~i.. ~ ," , . ~ 1 .LI~ , _. ... I~ :, 1 f s. i t I I i { ~l~. ~ I :i 1,l r: 1111 r l4 i~.. 1. , I i,.,it I i.... r., ,,., (.61 ~I:: , ,.. ~ I .:, ' I~:in 1 l.r-.Y ! 1 il li It (:1 L.t.il_ C- 1 ; l• .1.1 1:~. , 11 L:: 11 11 _ ..' . '' ' t 1 f i:S . 'I _. 1 111 t-t.. , ;r, :, ':~~ I1..S1 },...: 4 t~L: i j- 1 11 I : i...l... ,. ~:: , ,_ '.i . . {~tlilllr f.. ., i t + I ° 1 ~ i ~;, ~' 1 i 1 1 II',I 'I. :. t...f 1 4Lf .. i..., t ...f '~ .. , Jl '..t.l 1...,, f I I~ { t 1 ~ I 1 ( . i '1 i. f~~er ~ ~ r,..; . . 1 I . II~. ' ' 1 4 i ,... :: I ,-'.:! I 11:11,1 .:. t ~:, !, ~ 1 tfi l1 il„ , ~ ~ tt-st... , ,._. . 11, i . ~ _. i II it - I. fll~l , ~ 1 i. I'4- ..) 1 I 1 l 1 11 :{ { 1 ..Iii::: .l. _.. .' t.: .l.l _ ' I ( I -4:: i ~._1_ I I. ~ ...4 .1 1 t l 1 ! , : 1. ' L 1 .I:,:~,,i.:[.. 14 . ...„ 1 t r ,;1 I F I . is 'i L:,i-1 l°1 u , i .1 i {'. ~ I ~ ~ `L 1 11 4_.I I . ,. Iltll..1 :: .j I 'i 11 1 l ~. ~. i~ 1 { ,j ., ~ i ~ ~:~ ~ ~~ , . , ~ ~ .. ,. {- 1 J ~:: -i 1 1..1',. .I. . 1. 1.. L... 1:: 1 11...:1 , 1-. S_.._.. ~ : .} r :1. Ii„ , -i I .I..L_1 ~ I :, ,:. 11 I , ,. ,, , 1 r I 1 {, ~ _ j S.L.,I .,P . 1 ; 11.l ,., _, I I~ ,1. , ~ 'I C I I= ::1'; I 1i;.1, 1 u f4..... , , ;.:Ii.14 I i 1~::. . c :1 l ~: 111..! I 1 .. ,;:: : ,. I Lli..:f, I ' 'II:i i~1 1:1i : s r 11..,1 , ,„ _ ; , , , , 1 . I La: f1 I;1... „ I' ~. . ~ . .1 . ,. 1. 1. I'. ,. , ,: I I I _f , , _ L..I I 'j: 1 ' . it I .,. ~ i..~l.. ,.... t.~ ,...: .: ~ i ;,.:: ,..., ril`.ti _. .. ,l i 7i:;4Ir 1. ~. .... , .. i ..I i , ,i~ I ' ~..~ i:.r .I. ../-:.. ~~:.~ 1 I f~ 1 , . , i '~'1~ i .1, .,' I. .._. , , , 1'j 1 :.I, 1. f ~ ... I ,,. i (i. ; ~ :.Ij'11 !:II f 1 I , .. 1=; 1.~1 'I ... ~.I ... 11 I I i 1~' '~i .; ~ I' 1 1''. ~, .. I. ,.- ~; . ti 1. 1 .I. ;:. i f , ~ t: , .' 1 , i L4 ' ,:' ~ ' 1 :: i. 1 i .I. S % ,. ' ~ , I:; ~.. ; ; ~:; ;. I '...L `` ,_ , + r .L ~=` ;{ ; ~ _', 1 ~ , , , . I { i A , : ; .I. .. ; ' ; t ~ l: l .I. I ._ L.. ..I. l ` ,~ : I A.' ~. ! I 1. t I'~~1 I " i::i , i :i •' 1 ..i.l.l 1. I,: .~ I1 l 111 ?,,. , ,) 1 1 } ' II , I. I~. ,, \,~,, '4 , 1 j _, I ... 1. ' 1. , t-i 1a ,_ ., ..:.. ,... , I. ~.; o ;::'.'.: ,::: . .. ... ~ i:J,.... . ,_:y ,. ,.., l :i 1. i ..1 _:: .t i ;, ,i ~ I i::: , i :.., ,- I " ~ .~~ i,,; 1 ,l.i~ I: I . 1 .... i.: I- t ! I i . :. , ., t s .::: :.. ;:.Li i. '... i i 1 I r. I- ,_, ! i ,. 1 . ._ .1 : . .. ,.'.i., i ~=i :, ., ;.i' ~.1 .i. :.~ I.. i 1'11'.1. L:_ _1 :..! .. I"': i.,il.ji:.: I". I ...~ .. ..i 1, t.-1 .1...1..I..-i 1..:1 „ :::ii..:li..ll.... ,:..t. 1:1...) .. .... ... I .~ ". 1 1 4~.. j~.~ :.. ~: :.'~ -'::.1.. i ~~t '. .. .. I it li- i:.l i'tl :I.. ... ' i ...~ :. .... .: ! it I It't 1':, ~. I i~ ?I it 1:. I . . i'i_.t._.! i` '~~„ it l1 t:'{-11 t'_+:: , ,:~,? 1.i::i .,... L._t I._t`d l:::. , ~ i i.: •t ':I . ,.. ;::i; ll :i°il-I 1 t 1 ~:., .! ° ,. ;.,f 1 L. i':r,r~ i., i`; %t J l l ~..,.I .,- ;..I. L'. ii i I :: _. ! i-'il . . .. ,::,t I ,i _. .::; L.:.I .i...i fl....r II", i I h. ~i L. 4..i1", :::. ,. I~ ., f':'. i _.. ei ;t_ 1`i1.,'t-. I.%„ c i..+I-'I ' i.;;::i 4 ;,;.a t.:!'i1:::r~: i 1. r., ~ l.,lr_tL...i:Ft I .. . , , ... ~ I i:'~~~i i I ....., ' _ i I ;, ,.:ii1 1;;'--il ,'t ,.Ji r',I`.I i.lllisll.l' ~:~;t !.','; > .:. I::: • . t ] ::! i.a..li li'd .l. s_' 4 , i dt ,t..il.i A • , . ,- ,... •.'' l' _.. i._ iiif't.f :. i-',. 1, rIt t 1.1111 i:.,._i ~ ~ i ~ :I. ,:.~ .. i; it !L::. L:1.I :!:.t~: :.t_~;,(t..l!:: :._ s .. 'I "'•{ i' :: t' i t. l'il.i-, _.. I ' is:~, I' it t,...: 1. t , t ,.,,;1 I :.,.. i_J f:-: i i : „ i...i::~i`~1:ii='. (L... !: L:: !:: ;::;f f`;!:::: .i: i 4iJI t i 1i ii i ;r. ',~, :::i ~k:-; ..: S.~ 41 `, ' !:: :) .4::', ' ~-:! t, }: ... `. .C7 ,::: ~ ~, t:' ,: ?:; i::± ;; ,.;~:{ i:: ;:~ j ;:... i::; =i { ; ~ ''_1 i ! : ) .,. t ',; 1 l ':.i '''_ L . i I I ~, ; i; i '1. ~. : "•..~ I '.1 r , 1. , i. i I .1' i . .. i. ~'~'..' I._ i ~i;; , I 1 , s : ,''~ ::' . .- ,,. i ~::i .1.`"..' ,, ; i ::: r , '. I~::~. i:L ~:1 .i. ~I. :' i::. '. ?':1 I , ., . L. 1 ' .i ~_ .. ~ I ;:.:I i. ~.:~ i i :~ 1 ) ;l:r. , it ; .L r'i ;' ; ... ..~i >.i:; .. .... - _ . .L .. L . ' :i. i i`~'i'~.,t ~'.J l:.l ,::. ..-. I.:I. ~ ~ii.J C:i': i ;! ... •., :~ _ ' '' ,,~ t .,:,,' , 4 1 ,:; ,.. ;.., ,: is 1 I .....: ,. ,, ,.. ,, .J ; , , . ,, , ,t, 1 ,. , ; , i ,1 ` 1 "~11' II {tll(i1 •. 1 . i 1.: ., .1..1....1 't L:. ' \ 1 - V . . __. t::? 1 I I ~ 1 'V ..~ '1 ' .. y t .... ~ i .,.... t _, 4 1 ..4'.. t { 1 t_ t .I l i t. ~. ~ .._ " i...l 1. i.,:, 1.{ . . ... .. :: I., ... I ... , ~ , 1.. .. 1 '.:~.. ... ,., , ~:, i. I , .. _. y ~ ti y 11 I i 1 .~ 1.~ ~ 1{~ I 1 .. t~ t I.,- I'I...I .t. t 1 ... .. V S 1 ,1I-~ 11 ~ , , .1. ..l:t .. - ~`') `i~ , , ' . i I S 51" I L ,,. . 1 S ~ . ,Ih'I y.. , _ y ' ' ii>:~ 1 -. ; ` I ` \ ~ t .>~. t '_f` ; 4.. I,tl r:'. !.:_ 1 ... ,, I I.. I ,,1.1i`1 ' y i ~ ~ t. ~ ; ; t i ~. I 1; , 1 ~:., .. , '. 1 11..11.11 . , ' ,. ~ I I i I` .~ !V:44 Ii ~ .. , • 1 . ; ..' ' ..Y ..~ 1, . c' i .. ~ '.. 1 i .11 1 1 ~{ ' i I :. t ', _ : 1 X11 ... I. I 1 .I. t I t ~~ . I t ; t , ~: ,.1{ Ii1... :1::? + J -~i.) ~ ~ ~::i ~-'~ 1 ' I i- 1 , .1. ... C' ... I '^~ 1 s. { i i: 1,. _ I t 11..1. ` y y I .1 .1 I t .., ~ }, { ~.-1 !... t il.'1: i .l 1 I. 1 1 11::.4 { is ~ i j ..i 4 ! ... tSl yttt t1 ;= , 1'li s,is1..{i:t ' I , i 1 4.c.i1' ~ , ,. 4: ,: ,,: t 1 . ,-:. r t l.: i 1 s :. .. 1'. ~ t i ~ t ,~ .. 61 i. s.. :J , t _ I 4 I ,: 1 1 1.. i •, I 1::. 1 . ... ~::::. [,inc. 4.1!•. ,~ i: ~ .._ i'1 - t., r L 1.::. 4 i 1 ' 1 f-ti }, 11{ it". 1 I I ~ .: _- ;.., t I jii11 _ .._ I 4t , l ~1~~. 1°1 i 1 11 ll'1. :: .. ,tlti 1 , ._. I , tl.-. - ...- ,le~l ~ 1. C.: 1iY1:AWS OP I'IIE ROANOKI~: COUNTY CF1A1'TER 01' THE VI1tCINIA SCHOOL I'OOD SERVICE ASSOCIATION Ahl'ICLE I ---- --- --- __ NAME The name of this organization shall be the Roanoke county chapter of the Virginia School T'ood Service Association and is an affiliate of the Alllerican School food Service Association. Al:'),'ICLE II 1'U1~POSES Section A -Promote the optimal health, nutrition and education of al.l children by supporting nutritionally adequate and educationally sound, financially account.:~blc, nonprofit child nutrition and school conunuriity uutr:ition programs. Section }3 - Promote High standards for child nutrition and school. couuuuuity nutrition programs with emphasis on nutritionally-adequate meals which are appeal_in;:; to children. Section_C - Promote united efforts between school personnel, allied orl;anizstions, industry and the public to assure every child ari opportunity to receive, the benefits of the child nutrition and nutrition education programs. Section li - Promote high standards, provide appropriate education program incentives and recognition for proTessional development of child nutrition personnel. Section 1: -Promote research and development in child nutrition programs. Section I' -Promote the establishment of national nutrition policy and legislation which provides optimal nutrition and nutrition education for children. Section C - Promote the involvement of students and the school community in child nutrition programs. Section__H - Promote membership and provide services to meucbers. AI.'1 I CLE I I I 1~IEMBERSHIP Section_A. Members Active and P.etired: Membership of the organization shall consist of any l:erson enga}.;ed in nutritionally adequate, educationally sound and nonprofit school food service work or related activ=itic~s upon payment of national, state, and ]o~~ccl dues. A person once quali.tied as a member, but who ceases to be activ~~l.y engaged in non-profit school food service work may CUrltlnlli_ as a ucember, provided he or she does not accept umployme.nt in a nonelil;ible field. Section fi. Rights and Privileges of Members. 1. All active and retired members whose dues, if any, are curr currently paid, shall be entitled to cast ono vote, by m<ri.l, for the election of ofl=icers for the coming year and to cast one vote, by mail, upon .any matter subucitted to a vote oi` the voting mcu~bership of r.l~e orl;anizati_on. 2.Retired members shall. liavc~ all the r-iglus and privilo;c.s of active members except rlcc•y shall not be tc c<u~didate for elective -2- ARTICLE I'J ORGANI`LA'rIONAL STRUCTURE Section A. The Executive Board. The Executive Board shall be composed of the elected officers, who are the President, the President-Elect, the Secretory, and the Treasurer. The immediate Past President shall serve as ex-officio member without vote on the Executive Board. Duties: The duties of the Executive Board shall be to determine administrative policies, to manaye the business of the chapter, and to correlate the program with that of the Virginia School Food Service Association. Section B. The Executive Corrunittee. The Executive Committee shall be composed of the Executive Board, Chairman of Standing Committees, Special Committee Chairman as appointed by the President. The Executive Committee shall assist in carrying out the business and policies of the association and shall meet before each meeting. 1. Adopts the annual budget for the organization. 2. Approves Presidents Plan of Work for tha year. Section C. Committees. Tt~e Chapter shall have the following standing commitees: (1) Budget - This committee shall consist of the Treasurer as chairman, President, President-Fleet, Secretary, and irrunediate Past President. This committee shall each year draft a budget for the following fiscal year which the chairman shall submit in writing to the Executive Corrunittee; and the membership be responsible for analyzing reports and making recommendations to the Executive Corrunittee . (2) Public Communications - This committee shall consist of at least three members and shall be responsible for all publications and publicity concerning the chapter. (3) Bylaws - This committee shall consist of Past-Presidents of the Chapter. It's duties shall be to receive and make proposed amendments to the Bylaws, to receive the proposed amendments, prepare copies to be submitted for approval to the members of the Executive Committee. The copy of said changes shall be given to all members at a regular business meeting. After explanation by chairman of the committee, a vote must be taken for approval. (4) Legislative - This committee shall consist of a member of the Chapter, appointed by the President and subject to the approval of the Executive Committee. She shall keep the membership informed of State and National legislation. (5) Program - This committee shall consist of three (3) members appointed by the President. It shall be responsible for devotions at each meeting and the program for each banquet. (6) Certification and Affiliation - This committee shall consist of three members of the Chapter and shall be responsible for processing applications for. the affiliation of the Chapter with the State Association. (7) Membership - Pranote membership and work with Treasurer to keep members informed of due dates. (8) Nominating - the committee shall consist of (4) four members, one from each section of the county, who will prepare a slate of candidates for the offices to be filled. ARTICLE V Or'PICERS Section A, Elected Officers. The officers of the chapter shall consist of a President, President-Elect, secretary, and Treasurer. The -3- Section B. Appointed Officers. {1) Parliamentarian - The Parliamentarian shall be appointed by the Presid~_•nt to serve during her term of office. 'Che duties of the Parliuin~~ntarian shall be: Attend all meetings of tha Chapter and all Executive Board and Executive Committee meetings. She shall advise the President on parliamentary procedures, giving rulings when requested by the President to do so. (2) Advisor - the advisor shall be a member of the Chapter and hold the position of Supervisor of Food Services for the School Division. ELECTIONS The election of the office of President shall be conducted annually and for Secretary and Tre<~surer, biennially, as provided. The nominating committee shall consist of (4) four members, one from each section of the county, appointed by the President. This commmittee must present a slate containing two names for each office. `this slate shall be approved by the Executive Committee before it is presented to the membei-5hip to vote by ballot. a. The slate shall be prepared by the nominating couunittee and contain two names for each office to be filled. Space shall be provided on the ballot for write-in candidates. b. Ballots shall be sent to the membership. c. Returned ballots shall contain the membership number and signature. d. Three Tellers shall be appointed by the president of which one shall be head Teller. e. In order to be counted, ballots must be returned individually to the Chairman of the Tellers by the designated time. Three Tellers shall be present when vote is counted. f. Ballots shall be COUntGd by the `fellers. A write-in candidate's eligibility shall be documented by the Tellers. The head Teller shall be responsible to report the results to the membership at the next chapter meeting. VACANCIES In the event a vacancy occurs in the office of the President, the President Elect will assume the presidency and serve until the end of that year. A special election will be held to elect a new President-Elect according to the election procedures. In the event a vacancy occurs in the office of Secretary, Treasurer, ar President-Elect, a special election will be held according to election procedures. TERMS AND RESPONSIBILITIES President a. To preside at all meetings of the Chapter, Executive Board and Executive Committee. b. To study the local, state, and national constitutions. c. To appoint all standing and special coirunittees except those provided for in the constitution. To appoint a parlimentarian (if desired). d. `Po set a time schedule for the completion of work and reports. e. To advise with all conunittees in the planning of their work. f. To appoint tellers and conduct the election of officers in accordance with the Bylaws. g. To keep members informed on all organizational work at all three levels. h. `I'o see that meetings open and close on time. -4- President-Elect. a. To perform the duties of the President when President is absent. b. `Po perform additiona_1 duties as directed by the President. c. To learn the duties oL the officers and committees and be familiar with the bylaws of the chapter. d. 'T'o attend the state convention if at all possible. e. 'I'o succeed to the office of President in the case of a vacancy in that office - to serv~> until the end of that year. f. `I'o learn about local, state, and national organizations. g. To assume the Pres:idency upon the completion of the President's term of office. h. Plan program of work for the coming year. Secretary - The Secretary shall serve for two years. Responsibi lities: a. To preserv e the records. b. To keep an accurate record of all meetings. c. 'I'o conduct the correspondence of the chapter. d. To keep a file of letters received and sent. e. To furnish the President with a cony of the minutes f. To report . to state and national organizations when reports are requested. All reports should be approved by the chapter President. g. To submit secretary's record to the new secretary within 30 days after term of office. Treasurer - The Treasurer shall serve for two years. Responsibilities: a. To receive all funds and to deposit these funds in a local bank or credit union to the credit of the local chapter. b. To issue receipts for money collected. c. d To keep an accurate record T of all receipts and disbursements. . o act as Ct•,uirman of the budget committee. e. `I'o provide members of the Executive Committee, and such committees as require it, with a list of paid members f. To make a financial report . at all regular meetings. g. To collect dues of all members and send them to the State Treasurer. ARTICLE VI MEETINGS Section A. The Chapter shall hold at least four (4) business meetings during the year. ARTICLE VII AMENDMENTS Section A. The bylaws may be amended by a vote oL- a two-thrids affirmative vote of the -nernbers present at any business meeting. A copy of the amendments must be given to the membership twenty to thirty days prior to taking the vote. ARTICLE VIII PAtiLIAMENTARY PROCEDURE Section A. parliamentar Roberts auth it Rules of Urder, revised shall constitute the y or y for the conduct of the reetings of the Chapter. COUNTY OF ROp,NORE, VIRGINIA CAPITAL FUND UNAPPROPRIATED BALANCE 1989 $ 89,608 Beginning Balance at July 1, 25 000 September 12, 1989 Contribution towards Hollins Fire Truck $$ 6! Balance as of February 27, 1990 Submitted by ~ ~. ~.~- Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance N- 2~ November 15, 1989 November 28, 1989 December 19, 1989 December 19, 1989 December 19, 1989 January 9, 1990 January 23, 1990 COUNTY OF ROp,NORE, VIRGINIA GENERAL FUND UNAPPROPRIATED BALANCE Balance at July 1, 1989 Dental Insurance Drainage Projects Library Automation Drainage Engineer Bushdale Road Right of WaY Hurrican Hugo Expenses Implementation of New Police Department Balance as of February 27, 1990 of 0 Amount General Fund $4,483,543 7.10 (106,980) (180,000) (300,000) (35,000) (15,000) (109,000) (157 700) $3 579,863 Submitted by Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance 5.67% ervisors adopted a goal statement tc On December 19, 1989, the Board of Sup General Fund Unappropriated Balance at a Oo01mum of 6.25° °~ maintain the 63,168,000), which is $3,948, General Fund expenditures ($ ~` COUNTY OF ROANORE, VIRGINIA RESERVE FOR BOARD CONTINGENCY 1989 Beginning Balance at July 1, $11,395 Additional Amount from 1989-90 Budget 50,000 ne 14 J 1989 Contribution to Va. Amateur Sports (25,000) , u July 11, 1989 Purchase of drainage easement (5,000) July 11, 1989 Option on 200 acres real estate (3,750) July 25, 1989 Donation to Julian Wise Foundation 5, 000) ( August 8, 1989 osition County supplement for new p t (869) in Sheriff s Departmen August 22, 1989 Part time volunteer coordinator (5, 800) 1989 Public Information for Police Department 9,000 August 22 , referendum November 28, 1989 Stormwater Feasibility Study (3,382) December 1989 22 Copy machine rental for Treasurer's Office (2,415) , (Administratively approved) December 1989 29 Portable telephones for Rescue personnel 1 045 , (Administratively approved) 134 Bal ance as of February 27, 1990 Submitted by Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance 1 ~' COONTY OF R(-ANOEB INCONB ANALYSIS GBNBRAL OPERATING FUND 1988-89 TAZBS-RBAL BSTATB TAZBS-PERSONAL PROPBRTY OTHER PROPBRTY TAZBS SALBS TAZ BUSINESS LICBNSB AUTO DECALS OTHER LOCAL TAZBS DOG TAGS ZONING F6B5 BUILDING FBBS OTHBR PBRNIT, FBBS l LICBNSBS FINES AND FORFBITORBS SALBS i USB OF 6QUIPNBNi 1 SUPPLIBS CHARGBS FOR SBRVICBS RBCOYBRBD COST-LOCAL ABC PROFITS CONNONN6ALTH'S ATTORNBY BZPBNSBS SHBBIFF'S BZPBNSBS CONNISSIONBR OF THB RBVBNUB'S BZPBNSBS TRBASURBR'S BZPBNSBS Y$LFARB GRANT LIBRARY GRANT OTHER STATB RBVBNUB NON-RBVBNUB RBCBIPi TRANSFBR FRON OTHBfl FUNDS BEGINNING BALANCB USED TO BALANCE COSTS OF OPERATIONS TBNPORARY LOANS i LBASB PURCHASB PROCBBDS BOND PROCBBDS ACTUAL ACTUAL 6-30-89 1-31-89 BUDGBT (12 NONTHS~ (7 NONTHS) ------------ ------------ ------------ 25,780,009 26,802,142 13,107,515 10,200,000 11,872,511 502,966 1,257,293 1,325,954 1,221,170 4,390,492 4,140,633 1,955,426 2,400,000 2,248,433 1,249,253 1,150,000 1,322,655 90,533 4,015,220 4,123,196 1,834,832_ 18,000 14,963 6,158 15,000 25,426 16,078 345,000 321,549 177,658 11,282 38,314 18,968 162,000 226,709 112,589 0 151 150 150,510 , 203,654 84,180 504,029 582,557 438,762 230,045 185,194 78,021 263,843 244,871 123,969 3,170,000 3,574,719 1,060,999 119,485 165,210 79,415 171,853 168,125 83,973 1,961,441 1,950,053 162,627 175,000 174,860 87,430 321,075 264,908 116,238 5,035 6,520 291,282 p p 0 57,476,612 59,983,915 23,502,852 4,091,702 0 0 118,764 572,891 0 0 0 0 ------------ ------------ ------------ ; 62,347,078 S 60,556,806 ; 23,502,852 t SPBCIAL CONSIDBRATION ADDBD !0 BASIC CONFUTATION 1989-90 ACTUAL 1-31-90 X BUDGBT (7 NONTHS~ S S1 S 28,511,770 14,189,782 50 S 11,668,447 806,807 7 'i 91 1,435,000 1,371,137 96 45 4,200,000 2,082,214 50 52 2,100,000 1,172,645 56 i B 1,325,000 90,420 9 46 4,180,000 1,949,374 47 45 15,500 6,980 45 107 10,500 U ,267 136 51 408,611 233,116 57 168 7,250 13,929 192 69 165,000 82,013 50 0 0 1,563 0 56 160,401 79,433 50 ~ 87 554,643 332,334 60 ~ 34 200,000 80,008 40 4T 251,670 103,759 41 28 3,837,277 1,420,686 37 ~ 44 180,000 91,oB1 511 49 I80,000 89,848 50 39 2,061,414 849,563 41 50 175,000 131,350 75 36 245,000 189,780 77 5,785 0 11,195 0 16,000 16,000 0 41 61,894,543 25,409,884 41 0 3,365,847 0 0 p 0 0 0' 0 202,168 0 0 ---------- ------------ ------------ ---- 38 ; 65,462,556 ; 25,409,684 S 39 Finnncinl State~ents: Page 1 of 3 ~'~ COUNTY OP ROANOgB STATBMEHT OF 6aPBNDITURBS SBYBN MONTHS BNDBD JANUARY 31, 1990 BODGBT ------------ BIPENDBD ------------ - X ----------- GBNBRAL ADMINISTRATION BOARD OF SUPBRYI50RS = 116,618 = 106,563 60 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR 258,668 145,644 56 PBRSONNBL 241,169 136,482 56 COUNTY ATTORNEY 186,341 109,281 59 COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE 513,113 268,119 52 TREASURER 506,642 261,390 53 BLBCTIONS 163,O1Z 95,151 59 SESQUICBNTBNNIAL 0 15 0 FISCAL MANAGBMBNT ASST. CO ADM. MANAGBMBNT SBRVICBS 69,621 36,489 52 COUNTY ASSBSSOA 642,622 338,914 53 CBNTRAL ACCOUNTING 381,692 304,794 79 PROCURBMBNT 218,274 120,331 55 MANAGBMBNT A BUDGBT 130,222 59,051 45 RISb MANAGEMENT 1,130,318 116,423 63 JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION CIRCUIT COURT 118,133 13,492 11 GBNBRAL DISTRICT COURT 20,204 6,734 33 MAGISTAATBS 130 234 32 J & D DISTRICT COURT 11,158 6,113 57 CLBAb OF CIRCOIT COURT 516,653 259,818 50 COMMONYBALTfl'S ATTORNBY 312,279 172,707 55 PROBATION OFFICE 44,175 14,066 32 VICTIM KITNBSS 6,670 1,423 21 PUBLIC SAFBTY POLICING A INYBSTIGATING 4,223,968 2,247,395 53 flIGNYAY SAFBTY COMMISSION 960 60 6 FIRE 2,099,559 1,108,496 53 RBSCUB SQUAD 458,159 296,593 65 BMBRGBNCY SBRVICBS A flAZ MAT RBSPONSB 42,535 20,468 48 CONFINBMBNT~CARB OF PRISONBRS 2,018,249 1,164,164 58 ANIMAL CONTROL 164,044 100,943 62 RAZ-MAT RBSPONSB 0 (459) flUGO DISASTER RBCOYBAY 109,000 106,181 COMMUNITY SBRVICBS AND DBVBLOPMBNT ASS. CO ADM. FOR COMM. SBRVICBS L DBYBLOPMBN 112,674 59,156 53 BNGINBBRING 118,190 469,532 65 GBNBRAL SBRVICBS 208,BT0 115,848 S5 BUILDINGS MAIMTBHANCB 832,204 397,594 48 PARbS 1 ABCRBATION 990,924 S24,S20 53 RBFUSB 1,599,149 936,138 59 PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION 65,400 28,409 43 GROUNDS MAIMTBHANCB 932,092 596,234 64 Financial Stateaenta: Page Z of 3 ~-~ COUNTY OF ROANOKB STATBMBNT OF B%PBNDITURBS SBYBN MONtflS BNDBD JANUARY 31, 1990 flBALTfl ASOCIAL SBRYICBS 425,799 303,433 11 PUBLIC flBALTfl SOCIAL SBRVICBS ADMINISTRATION 1,840,244 954,030 982,668 498,204 53 52 POBLIC ASSISTANCE 36,000 13,488 37 INSTITUTIONAL CARB 984 94 41,492 50 SOCIAL SBRYICB ORGANIZATIONS , DBVBLOPMBNt 336,553 161,102 48 PLANNING A ZONING 264,530 179,474 68 BCONONIC DBVBLOPMBNT 134,602 73,144 54 DBVBLOPMBNT RBVIEW 18,695 10,115 54 PLANNING COMMISSION 842 262 141,926 54 CONSTRUCTION BUILDING SBRYICBS , NON-DBPARTBENTAL 675 97 51,259 52 ASST. CO. ADM. HUMAN SBRYICBS , 1,147,333 587,919 51 LIBRARY B%TBNSION A CONTINUING gDUCATION 104,694 759,298 23,268 418,046 22 63 BNPLOYBB BBNBFITS CONYRIBUTIONS TO SBRVICB ORGANIZATIONS 30,000 867,430 21,450 117,558 T2 14 MISCBLLANBOUS 198,350 32,058 16 CONSOLIDATION _ ----------- --- --------- 27,807,010 15,076,242 ~4 TOTAL ---------- --- - ------ TRANSFBRS AND RBSBRVBS 0 (70~ 0 ABIMBURSABLB B%PBNDITURBS 5 668,360 3,111,344 55 tRANSFBA TO DBBT SBRVICB , 365 339 152,916 !5 TRANSFBA TO INTBRNAL SBRYICB O SCHOOL OPBRATING FUND , 28,637,950 11,446,908 40 58 TRANSFBR T 40,000 23,333 TRANSFBR TO SBWBR FUND 000 525 306,250 58 TRANSFBR TO UTILITY CAPITAL , 612 334 209,290 63 TRANSFBR TO CAPITAL PROIBCTS , 18,658 45,884 58 TRANSFBA TO YOUTH flAYBN 120,000 0 0 TRANSFBA TO GARAGB II 913,250 1 0 0 UNAPPROPRIATBD BALANCB , 7 266 0 ~ ABSBRVB FOR BOARD CONTINGBNCY , ____________ _ ________ _ TOTAL TRANSFBR ITBMS 31,664,461 15,295,855 -____---41- = 65,471,471 S 30,372,091 46 GRAND TOTAL ----------- ====----=-== Financial Statevents: Page 3 of 3 ACTION # ITEM NUMBER ~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THEOANOKE OCOUNTYEADMINISTRATIONNCENTER COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE R MEETING DATE: February 27, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: Accounts Paid - January 1990 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: $2,288,078.81 Payments to Vendors: $ 413,037.82 Payroll: 216/90 416,797.52 829 835.34 $3 117,914.15 A detailed listing of the payments is on file with the Clerk to the Board of Supervisors. SUBMITTED BY: ~/ 1/ nme ~ Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance APPROVED: ~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ---------- --------- VOTE -------------- ACTION No yes Abs Approved ( ) Motion by: Eddy Denied ( ) Johnson Received ( ) McGraw Referred ( ) Nickens To Robers AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BORO~oKESCOUNTYSADMINISTRp,TION COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE 1990 CENTER ON TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 27, RESOLUTIONN CONFORMITY WITH THEECODETOFG WAS HELD I VIRGINIA WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, on this date pursuant Virginia has convened an executive meeting to an affirmative recorded vote and in accordance with the rovisions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act, and p WHEREAS, Section 2.1-344.1 of the Code of Virginia re uires a certification by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke q Virginia that such executive meeting was conducted in County, conformity with Virginia Law. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, Supervisors of Roanoke County, that the Board of Virginia hereby certifies that, to the best of each members knowledge: ted from exemp 1. Only public business matters lawfully o en meeting requirements by Virginia law were discussed in the p lies, executive meeting which this certification resolution app and 2. Only such public business matters as were identified the executive meeting were heard, in the motion convening discussed or considered by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: February 27, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: Request from Citizens to Speak regarding "No Left Turn" signs in Boxley Hills Subdivision COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION Several citizens have requested time on the agenda to speak regarding the "No Left Turn" signs that have been installed entering the Boxley Hills subdivision in an effort to reduce "cruising" in that neighborhood. Supervisor Johnson asked that they be given an opportunity to speak prior to the public hearings. Scheduled to speak as of Friday, February 23, 1990 are: 1. Mr. Tom Runions, 802 Commander Drive N. W. 2. Mr. Ton Blandy, 810 Commander Drive N. W. 3. David Clark, Pilots Corporation 5611 Williamson Road ------------------------ACTION VOTE wr.. Voc at~,a Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) Motion by: Eddy Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers ~IIII:Illlllllllilllllllliillllllilllllllllllllllllllllllli~llllllillllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllillllllllllllilll - ~, - ~~ 2~ _fi ARAN CE RE UE S' , , ., .~.~e.,~~, _ APPS Q ~4,~ 5- - ~.wa ~ s -fWw'Yq 'tq - y ~`§Mi..+:,e..w .. ~r~.+r~ii;..p) ~ay!WA'~'d*'c4 -_ ENDA ITEM NO. ' Y~»~ - AG ~x~Y ~.~~cS SUBJECT "No ~~~7~ T~~n1 " ~1~~t1S --~4-~r-A-~~ ~~o~ ~v~~vv~~a __ - I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter =_ - so that I may comment.WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIU , = I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINE LISTED BELOW. ~. • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, c and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to - do otherwise. • Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Ques- Lions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ;_ • All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized __ speaker and audience members is not allowed. • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. • SnpakQrc are revues#ed to leave anv written statements andlor comments with the clerk. • INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TU DEPUTY CLERK ~ ~M "~Nlo NAME g0 02 COl~1 M!~-Ju D~~ ~~ c ADDRESS PHONE - mllllllllilllllllllllllll lllllillllllllll l l l l lllllllll lllllllllllillllllllllililililllillllllllllllllllllillillllllllllllll ll~lliillllillllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllilllllllllllllllllllllllllll11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 APPEARANCE RE VEST ~~~ _ Q __ - P` AGENDA ITEM NO. ~~ ` ` _ = suBJECT ~ _ I would like the airman of the Board of Supex~tisors to recognize me during the public hearin on the above matter - so that I ma comment.WHEN CALLS TO THE PODIUM, - I WILL. GI E MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE = RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES = LISTED BELOW. • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. • Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Ques- bons of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. • All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. • Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. • INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FQR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT c - THEM. - PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO DEPUTY CLERK mllllllllilllllllllillllllllllllllllilllllllllllllllillllllllllillllliiillillllllllllillllllllllilllllllillllilillllllllliilll Iilllllllllllllllllillllillllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllltl111tlitttt~ii~~~~++++++~~,C~ IIIlillllllll .. 7~~ `'~~ RE UE ST ~~~ ANCE Q APPEAR .,W ~- _ 1 _ ~.: GENDA ITEM NO• __ A ~ _ ECT c -~' _ SUBj Board of Supex~sors to " I would like the Chairman o t e ublic hearin on the above matter reco nine me during the p E~j TO THE PODIUM, that I ma comment.WHEN CA SS FOR THE ' so ADDRE _ I WILL GI E MY NAME "" ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES RECORD. I AGREE T __ LIS'T'ED BELO • e even between three to five minutes to comment or re resentative. 'T'he chairman will • Each speaker will b g individual p on an issue, whether speaking as an •ori of the Board to • the time limit based on the number of cIh ma sPty m$ ." decide - and will enforce the rule unless instructed by t 1 s -_ do otherwise. • oint of view only. Ques- • S eskers will be limited to a presentation of their p =_ P of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman' • ." bons "' t be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognize c • All comments mus '" s esker and audience members is not allowed. =_ p and the audience will exercise courtesy at all tunes. • Both speakers "" written statements and/or comments • Speakers are requested to leave any =_ with the Berk. URPORTING TO SPEAK FQR AN ORGANIZED TTEN AUTHORIZATION • INDIVIDUALS P CLERK wRI ~" GROUP SHALL FILE W'I'TH THE ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESEN "' FROM THE GROUP T~M• CLERK "~ NT LEGIBLY AND GIVE To D PLEASE PR __ NAME '~ 1 _ ~ (~ l I c ADDRESS -' ~ ~. ~~ - ~_ _ PHONE v fittillililllllllllllillllllllilllllllllllllilll IIIIIIIIIIilliilllillllilllllllllillllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllilllllliiitiit~~t~i~u ~Illilillllllllllllllillllillllll , ,_ ,A~ _ ~ - ~~..:~'~ NCE REQUES = APPEARA _ _ - '" AGENDA ITEM NO. __--- - - __ L- `~ / rI2 ~ __ _ - _ suBJ __ - ~ ECT ~' ~ Ol'S t0 = would like the Chairman Of the Board o up ab ve matter I - reco nine me ding the ublic hearing on e = g p LED TO THE PODIUM, - y1lHEN CAL - so that I ma commen~E AND ADDRESS FOR THE ~MYN - - I WILL GI - REE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES - . I AG RECORD ' -__ D BELOW. -' LISTS n between three to five minutes to comment • Each speaker will be give _ as an individual or representative. The chairman will = whether speaking -' time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on ~- issue, ' = decide the c enforce the rule unless instructed by the ma~onty of the Boar to - and will do otherwise. __ be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Ques- _ • Speakers will =_ Lions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman• Debate between a recognized • All comments must be directed to the Board. __ speaker and audience members is not allowed. • • Both s eskers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all tunes. ___ p ers are re uested to leave any written statements and/or comments • Speak q with the clerk. • IVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FQR AN ORGANIZED IND LL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION GROUP SHA -' THE GROUP ALLOWING THE I~IVIDUAL TO REPRESS FROM .- .~~ _ LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO DEPUTY CL s - PLEASE PRI NAME - _ ~ ~~ ~~ .4~ c ADDRESS _. -_ _ ~~ .. '~ PHONE ~-- -_ "' Iillllillilllllllllllllllillllllliillllillllllllllllllllilllllllilllll fiilllilillllllllllllllllllllllllillll 11111 l l IIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIilllllllllllllllllllllillllllllllllllliilillillllllillillllllllllllllllilillllllllllllllllllllilllllllllllllllllllll lu s - ~. - - ~.... - _ - APPEARANCE REQUEST __ _ ,-~ - AGENDA ITEM NO. `~`> - SUBJECT ~ . _._ _~ ~, ,>,, - - ~_ = I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supex~tisors to recognize me during the public hearin on the above matter - so that I ma comment.WHEN CALLE TO THE PODI , - I WILL GI E MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR T - RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINE - LISTED BELOW. • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will - decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, = and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to __ do otherwise. • Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Ques- bons of cl ' 'cation may be entertained by the Chairman. _ • All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized = speaker and audience members is not allowed. • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. • Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. • INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FQR AN ORGANIZED s GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION '- FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. - PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO DEPUTY CLER - _ _ _ _. = NAME ~ '`~/~.. ~ ~ ~;. _ ~ ~ ~ . ~ r ~~ ~~ ~ - ~ ~ ~. . ADDRESS _~ ~~' ! ~_ ~ ~~`~ 1~ 1> `/ .1i - -_ - = PHONE ~-, -~ r- , ~~ ..~ ~, - .~ mliilllllllllillllllllillllllllllllllllll l l Iiilillllilillilllllllllillllllilillillllillllllllllllilllllliilllllllllllillll Illlillllillllllillllllllilllllillllllllilllllllllllliillllllillllllllllllllllllllllllillllillllillllilllillllllll~ ~IIIIIIIIIIIIII _ . ~~- ~~~~~ CE RE VEST APPEARAN Q _ ,,r s AGENDA ITEM NO. - SUBJECT ~`~~ ~% ~- _ `~ _ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to - reco nine me during the public hearing on the above matter - WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIU , -_ so that I ma comment. I WILL GIVE 1l~Y NAi:'IE AND A LDP•ESS' i OR THE _ RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINE = LISTED BELOW. -_ • ker will be iven between three to five minutes to comment .., Each spea $ c whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens s~ta of he Board toes and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the ma~o y do otherwise. • S eakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Ques- -= t pons of clarification maybe entertained by the Chairman. .. • ments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized ... All com = speaker and audience members is not allowed. - • th s eakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ~- Bo p • rs are requested to leave any written statements andlor comments Sneake . , with the clerk. _ • INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION - FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. ~' PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO DEPUTY CLE - NAME ~~ "~ ~\ ~ ~ ~ ~ a~ ~~ ~ - .-..~ _. u ADDRESS ~ ~..~ ~~ ~ ~ ` ~~ - PHONE ~ '~ lllllillillllilillllllllllll lllllllllilllllllllllllllllllilllliliilllllllllllllilllllllillliillllllllllll mlllllllllllllil IIl1111111111111111111111111Illlllllllillllllllllllllllllillllilllllitil~ Iillllllliillllllllllllllllllllllllllilllllllllllillilll ... W ~' _ ..~~ - - ~ - _ - _ ANCE REQ U.E ST ,r _ APPE.A-R _ . _ A ITEM NO. ' AGEND - . SUBJECT -~ ~~~, a. ~~ .~','LL _ airman of the Board of Supex~tisors to I would like the Ch the ublic hearin on the above matter recognize me during p _ nt.WHEN CALLS TO THE PODI = so that I may comme _ Y NAME AND ADDRESS FOR T - I WILL GIVE _ EE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINE RECORD. I AG -= LISTED BELOW. "' will be iven between three to five minutes to comment • Each speaker $ ._ an individual or representative. The chairm ~ ssue, :: whether s Baking as =_ he time limit based on the number of citize as one o f ~e Board to decide t c and will enforce the rule unless instructed by them ~ -_ do otherwise. "' invited to a presentation of their point of view only. Ques- • Speakers will be 1 =_ bons of cl ' 'cation may be entertained by the Chairman' _ Debate between a recognized _ • All comments must be directed to the Board. s esker and audience members is not allowed. . p • eskers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. Both sp = written statements and/or comments _ • Speakers are requested to leave any with the clerk. LS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED • INDIVIDUA _ LE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION = GROUP SHALL FI OUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESEN FROM THE GR THEM. _ LY AND GIVE TO DEPUTY CLER _ PLEASE PRINT LEGI .. NAME ~~ ; U; ~~ > ~ _ = r ~ ~~ "' ADDRESS ~ ~ '~ '- PHONE ~ ~~ ~`~~ _ -_ _ Illllillllllllllllllllllllllllllllililllllllllllllllllllllllilll mlllillllllillllliliililllliillllllilllllllll Ililllllil 11 ..w:: ~~ I""~"""""""^"" ~ ~ ~'y ~+Th _ T ~~~ RE UES CE Q _ PEA~AN AP _ ,) ~ 7~ , ~ AGENDA ITEM NO. ` ~ ~ ~ ~j,_ ; ~ -~ ~~~.,.~,~ • Chairman of the Board of Supers a matter I would like the the ublic hearing on the abo I,~M , nize me dur~.ng ED TO THE POT) recog yvHEN CALL ' so that I ma cowmen A~ ADD,RESS FOR T~ MY NAME I WILL GI GUIDELINES CORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE RE LISTED BELOW. 'ven between three to five minutes to comment dual or representative The chairman will • Each speaker will as $~ indivi on an issue, . unit based on the mm~ber of citizens spea~n$ whether speaMn$ •ori of the Board to - decide the time 1 1 enforce the rule unless instructed by the mal ,- and wrl =_ do otherwise. Dint of view only. Ques- • keys will be limited to a presentation of their p • the Chairman• Spea bons of clarification may be entertained Y a reco ized e directed to the Boazd. Debate between $n :- • All comments must b =_ er and audience members is not allowed. • eak sp nd the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. • Both speakers a '- written statements and/or comments - uested to leave any • Speakers are req with the clerk. OR'I'ING TO SPEAK FQR AN ORGAOgI~TION • I~IVIDUALS PURP TTEN RUTH ._ CLERK W~ '- GROUP SHALL FILE WITH T~ INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE -' 'r~M• CLERK GIVE TO DEP rLEASE PRINT LEGIB ,,, NAME ADDRESS PHONE _ ~~ ~,~~~~~~ Iliillllilliilllllillliilllllllilllllll~llllitllllllilllll~ii~i~~~~wj _ _ E VEST = RANCE ~ _ ..PPE A _ ~ _ _ ~ ~ _ __ _ _ ~, _ _ _ A ITEM NO. S~ G ~ AGEND S7 G N 5 ~-- ~ 7~~ ~ __ SUBJECT e~isors to - ike the Chairman of the Board of Sup - I would 1 he ublic hearin on the above matter = recogn~e me during t P LED TO THE PODIUM, = WHEN CAL - so that I may cowmen • - MY NAME AND ADDRESS FO I WILL GIVE '" REE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDEL - RECORD. I A __ LISTED BELOW. '" ' 1 be iven between three to five minutes to comment c • Each speaker wil gn individual or representative. The chairman will whether speaking as a on an issue, .- time limit based on the number of citize as orple o f ~e Boyd to -- decide the and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the m __ do otherwise. _ 'ted to a resentation of their point of view only. Ques- __ • Speakers will be lima P . __ ' ons of cl ' 'cation may b e entertained by the Chairman' - ti must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognize • All comments s esker and audience members is not allowed. p ers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. __ • Both speak ested to leave any written statements and/or comments ~ Speakers are requ with the clerk. LS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED _ CLERK WRITTEN AUTHO~ZATION • INDIVIDUA - GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE P ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT '- FROM THE GROU = THEM. _ LY AND GIVE TO DEPUTY CLE PLEASE PRINT LEGI NAME ~ ;, - ADDRESS ... _ ~- - ~ PHONE "' ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~f~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ m~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-~-~~f~~~~~~ t~W, .-~~F1' i tL ivU ~ UJ-J~~-~1~y7 k f" h • iv i 1I~~O 1 ~.-6 Feb 26,90 15:~~ No.~i~ ~."• 0 T~:FSDAY FEdKU t:1 Y ~ ,~ 90 ~E~ NG UR E'N11 =MUST RECEIVE FOR DELI j y~~4 TO BRA A HOL _ 772-20~ FOR MR BAB JOHNSON ,TD READ A--T THE ABOVE BDARD MEETING ' ME'S~gGE AS F'OLL.OWSi, ATTENTION : ROANOKE' COUNTY dUARA OF St/PE~kV l SORS ATTENTION: MR. BOB JOHNSON FROM: BOX_. LEY H_~..LS RL`''IDENTS UNA9LE TO ATT~'ND THE MEETING. ~/~~ is l~' ffac~ie~~ RE'57DENTS ~ Y R SUPPORT II5 GREATLY N~'EDED_' 1988 several residents met wi th our Boarc/ at November 22, motive Mr. Bob Supervisors and our area represe with over 2O0 residential Johnson, presenting the board wp received tl,s• signatures asking for a "NO CRUI`a~E ORDINANCE ~,/Vp LEFT TURN SIGNS" {6) to see i f the signs would solve the "CRUISING PRl7BLEM", i f this Solution didn " t l~el p Our Cruls~n9 the Board would try other means, a radar Check at problem" Abney Rd. was mentioned to ve-'i fY wl,etl,er we could RpadSa traffic signal 11ght ,znstalatdoltenforcemeot~ havebhelped 9B% The signs -- <and pot i ce P in keeping the "CRUISERS" from taki„g over Surenr'e~sob~rhhdde Please don't stop what the board of P the si ns removed! Nei9hbthe accomplished so tar by wan{onward ir-g getting rid of M,e have made a giant step ht1 tralfiG drunk, harassing, littering, bumper to bumper nig Y the cruiss'r5 entail upon us. If the signs dre taken down the cruisers will take-over our roads and neighbArhaod a~UARA PLEA E D~_t LET THIS HAF'P~IV_ -PLEASC SUPPORT WHAT ~!~ .--- DF' SUPERVI5DR5 NAVE ALREADY N~EF RR SSOL~T~ONS L TU NSTDPETN~ ST~ y ANp DD FOf? US. SEARC - ~~ I NTH T AND "CRUISERS FDR GUODT ..W~ ~~ THEI9UARD DF S[!l'E-RV I SDRS I5 TRYING ADVANTAGE TA SUPPDR TD DO FDR BOXLEY HIS ~ EN~ENCE AND SACRIFICE WURTHW ~LE UT(J 1 JrN • T T/-/IS SMALL INCU'NV EACH ONE OF US, TO PRE~VL UUR QUIET AND PEAC~~ NE'IGHH~7R1-IOOD? THE IS GNS ARE PHONES BYHT 9 p •Nl)~N? FRIDAY,_ SURE MOST QF~ US ARE I N OUR gATURDAV AND SUNDAY ANDTMALVDERN ROADS WIT1-lOUT ~Hf:LS GNSN~ AB EY. DARBY _ COMMANDER HDW DID YOU GET THROUGH A YDUR HH M T HBEFO_RE,-F 7 HE S~N I AwERE ENJOY 5I T~ G QUT5I DE - -- INSTA~-LED? 1'F YOU pDN " T L., I KE THE 51 GNS PLEASE WL•' AEG YO1J TO S E'A! A "NO-CRUISE ORD I NANCL' "FO E/DYNE SI GNS_ J~?C RAZEDL • L p EASE WILLIAMStIN !~i ABNEY, ROADS BE,~ BE ASSURED WE HAVE -`~.QM~ TYPE ~• t-pw pR DRDINANC~ l~O KEEP THL -Cf~UlS~RS" ~T !7F DUR NEIGN~ HD~D~~ RrillS ISIIJN ~El~!E ASK tlFUR AGAIN WITH JIBE SAME DLD PROBL ._ - NDVEM,!„_ ER 22 _ 1 `_. 8B• THANK. YUU FOR YUU1~ SUPPORTw.. L;ONCERNED NEIGHBORS IlV St/PPDRT OF THE SIGNSy A TRAFFIC. SIGNAL LIGHT AT W I L L,,,_,,,I AMSON ~r ABNE,Y. RD5 . AND A _"NO GKUI SE. ORD I NRNCE+ ".r,. THANK YOU. Letter from following Boxley Hills Residents Mr. and Mrs. Shrader Mrs. V. Jones Mr. and Mrs. Jefferson Mr. and Mrs. McCray Mrs. Wilham Mr. and Mrs. Case Mrs. Lawton Mrs. Turner Mr and Mrs. Craddock Mrs. Yarbrough Mr. and Mrs. Wygal Mr. and Mrs. Booth Mr. and Mrs. Skelton Mrs. English Mr. and Mrs. Davidson Mrs. Dalise Mrs. Brown Mr. Shaffer Mr. B. Jones Mr. Easterly Mr. and Mrs. Allen Mr. Coulson Mr. Croft Mr. and Mrs. Hubble Mr. and Mrs. Campbell 7 OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADM990 STRp,TION CENTS , AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD VIRGINIA, HELD FEBRUARY 27, TUESDAY, D USE ORDINANCE 227_ TO p,MEND THE FUTURE LAN PLAN Mpp DESIGNATION OI'' ROAD AND SOUTH50F LOTS LOCATED WEST OF HOLLINS AND TO LANE IN THE HOLLIN3 MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM DEVELOPMENT TO PRINCIPAL INDUSTRIA 1 TO THE CHp,NGE THE ZOICATION M-1FWITHICONDITIONS FOR ZONING CJ,ASSIF COUNTY, INDUSTRIAL PURPOSES UPON THE APPLICATION O THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE VIRGINIA. ervisors of WHEREAS, by Resolution 91289-4 the Board of Sup rehensive County, Virginia, initiated amendments to the Comp Roanoke lassifications of certain real estate located in Plan and to the c ur oses of the County as Roanoke County to serve the public p P and ublic necessity, convenience, general welfare, required by P of the ractice to implement the recommendations good zoning p and conomic Development Action Plan for FY 1989-90; held on E EREAS, the first reading of this ordinance wa ~ and public hearing was October 24, 1989, and the second reading held on December 19, 1989; and, ublic the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a p WHEREAS, and, 1989; hearing on this matter on November 9- rovided as WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been p required by law. INED by the Board of Supe~isors of Roanoke Coun y, BE IT ORDA Virginia, as follows: certain designation of a 1. That the Future Land Use Plan ma tel 54 acres, as describ- tract of real estate containing approxima Y Friendship Manor and located west of Hollins ed herein, owned by Lois Lane in the Hollins Magisterial District be Road and south of and ed from Development to Principal Industrial; Chang zoning classification of a certain tract of rea 2. That the a proximately 54 acres, as described herein, estate containing P hi Manor and located west of Hollins Road an owned by Friends p is hereby ois Lane in the Hollins Magisterial District, south of L of R1, Single-Family changed from the zoning classification to the zoning classification of M1, Light Residential District, Industrial District. lication to change the 3. That the Board initiated the apP of this real hensive Plan and the zoning classification Compre to serve the public purposes of estate located in Roanoke County ecessity, convenience, general the County as required by public n nin practice to implement the recommendations welfare, and good zo g 1989-90. of the Economic Development Action Plan for FY licant has voluntarily proffered in writing 4, That the app e~isors hereby e following conditions which the Board of Sup th accepts: ermitted uses will not be allowed: a, The following p i, flea markets cleaning ii. commercial laundries and dry iii. commercial kennels iv. seed and feed stottery~ etc. v, manufacture of a r~ etc. vi. automobile rep ~~E~~ screening where adjacent to residential b. TYPe uses. ise levels to be limited to 60 decibels when c• NO acent residence. measured at adj ment and ation measures during site develop d, Dust mitig construction. 'd real estate is more fully described as follows: 5. That sai ht-of-way line of in set in toia Route 115); thence Beginning at an iron P S. 80 54' 20" Hollins Road, State Route 601 line of Hollins Road, ht-of-way 80 23, 40•• W. 467.04 feet; with the rig thence S • o ~ 54., `„~. ~ a tangent of W, 227.38 feet; S• 11 50 an arch thence on a curve bearing of 2,759.65 feet, 140 feet on a radiu with a chord bearing of S. 286.36 to an iron distance of 570.67 feet, Hinman; thence 19 , 7 ~~ W , , and a cord d o erty f David W feet - iron pin pin at the corner to pr 450 44, W• 347.33 to an 38° 45' 00 W. 117.00 feet to an iron pin with the Hinman line S. ~~ set; thence N. 0 45' 00" W. 296.00 feet to an iron pin set; thence S. 30° ~ „ 67,50 feet to an iron pin set; thence S. 59° 15~ 00„ E. 42,00 feet to an iron pin thence N. 40 22 00 to an iron pin set; 0 38~ 00" E. 14.00 feet corner post; set; thence S • 410 00,. W. 351.25 feet tO 320 30' ~~ W' 30 set; thence S. thence continuing with the Hinman line et to an iron pin set in the line of Rthence 1,122.00 fe Meador near a 36 inch white oak; B, and Hamner W• 390 23~ 40" E- 304.38 feet to a with the Meador lone N00~~ W. 115.5 feet to an iron pin; post; thence N. corner of the 830 351 00" W, 107.18 fee the middle of Tinker thence N• H• Meador located in continuing property of H. H. Meador 150.00 Creek; thence with the line of H• 80 36' 40" W• Tinker Creek N • 20~~ E • 100 feet to a upstream bisectin thence N. 70 23' Dint; thence 417.00 feet to a point; ° ~ 20., E• to a P re , 12 23 a point; thence N. feet to a point in the median Sto es° thence continuing ro erty of Ethel B• 150 59' 40" E. 207.95 corner to P P Tinker Creek N. 00~~ E. 199.75 feet; upstream bisoe ntln thence N. 240 19 ~ in set at feet to a o 22' 00„ E, 130.89 feet to an iron of Tinker thence N • 3 6.. sycamore tree on the DOnWdy ~ 5 heirs ; the base of a ro erty line of Mattie B• S. 720 42' 00" Creek in the p P, heirs, 790 12' p0" thence with the line of thiDoSet; thence S. acent to the edge E. 123.75 feet to an iron P in set adj with the line of E. 300.30 feet to an thence continuing and Marian F. of an old farm road; ro erty of James G- in set the Dowdy heo rs and P E P 3 4 2.7 O feet to an N °chols and Kelly, S. 69 42 00" ro erties of Minnie odes; thence at the corner of P P odes, S. 220 Josephine L. Showalter and Ester S- with the line of Showalter and ~ of beginn- continuing Dint and p 28' 00 W. 515.70 feet to the p lat of survey 52,11 acres as s B ford T. Lumsden and containing ing; 1976, prepared by ress- dated March 2 , to which reference is he t boy eXO f the Associates, C.L•S•~ articularly descrip ly made for a more p property herein expressed. ffective date of this ordinance shall be February 6. That the e 27, 1990. isor Johnson, and carried by the following On motion of Super recorded vote: Johnson, Nickens, Robers Supe~isors Eddy, McGraw, AYES: NAYS: None A Copy TESTE: ~• Mary H. Allen, Clerk Board of Supervisors Roanoke County File Development & Inspections cc: Director, Arnold Covey-ton, Director, Planning Terry Harring Real Estate Assessment John Willey, DirectorAttorney Paul Mahoney, County PETITION: CASE ~ ppUi~?T`Y Bp,ARD OF SUPERVISORS (FRIFI~IDSHIP R) 37-11/89 Planning mission Hearing Dates Board of Supervisors Hearing Dates A. November 9, 1989 ~v~nber 28, 1989 ~~~ RD~E~ visors to amend the Future Ilan ndustr is Board of Super nt to Principa Petition of Roanoke r~~nately 54 acres fran Develogme nt, located ~p designation of aPPro erty from R-1 to M-1 for ind s~aa aD stro and to rezone said p P Hollins Mag west of Hollins Road and south of LolS bane, otential groundwater B. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION er and Sherry Shonhor voiocb ~ heir concerns; P Ga i 1 Bowy aff is p contamination and increased tr IMPACT FAC'T'ORS nt Plan has placed this C' SIC~IFICANr ro riate designation rehensive Plan: The 1985 Comprehensive Developrie 1. Comp nt designation. This is an nPPhe rehensive Plan. area within the DeVelopme rescribed according to the land use determinan cl Y in the area, water and sewer avail- lic facilities capa There is adeguate ~ rowth is good, natural land f~er eis(dire t access ability for residential g for residential develop~nt- and the area is provide optimtun opportunity er roads, to major streets suche sect rntation and Hershberg tion of within the urban servic ~nclnent to change the dconventional The petitioner has filed a Lai I~uS ap a1. gmall industries, rehen- rks are three of the land use types the The this parcel of land to principa industries, and industrial pa al Industrial areas. 1 Industrial areas accord- sive Plan finds to rescribeS the location of Pr nc ~ rn--this parcel has not rehensive Plan p land use pa ing to various factors: (1) Existing zoned R-1. en an industrial site but eerercel is currenUtlylal dev one historically be (2) misting zoning- th Pa ments in the vicinitstrial site--this Parcel has been identifiedoin n~ud enters- (5 (3) Potential indu tential industrial site. (4) ~ ~. in 1981, 1985, and 1989 as a Po hazard preven- 'ousl , there are several otheriteria~(6) Flood vicinity. as stated previ Y ear floodplain. (7) Topography--this site is within the 10~ slope c round- tion--the western portion of this site is wi such as100e n air (8) Wa ~ and lic resources. Resource Protection--valuable ~~trial development of this site. water could be threa~e v~Ta ~ and sewer is availab Scheduled for seconodary rnoad Sewer service--adeq~ could be easily made. (9) Access--Route 601 is in FY 92-93 and the site is closi to Plantation and Hershbergo from a private road (Lois Lanes improvanents currently be accessed on Y or tat roads. The site can radii. (10) Transp roximity to the airport and major which is-inadegl~eeisuwithlnireasonablerping centers- this (11) Urban sector--this site is within the urban service area' street systgt- rently no public road access to this site. Petition- There is cur this site would be accessed from Route 2. Circulation: t when developed. er has indicated tha f f is and turning movemen u~o of this parcel o dland.rse y 601. Increased affect the residential areas to the north and so ezone to M-1, the possibility est to r Since this is an unconditional re~u 3, Air: t int-source air pollution impacts on the surrounding exists for significan Po residential areas. ~wy,.I,A ~.~ an unconditional request to rezone to M-1, the ' nificant point-source groundwater pollution impacts 4, Water: Since this is possibility exists for slg on the surrounding residential areas. an unconditional reques act on the surMounding 5. Noise: Since this is t noise pollution imp possibility exists for significan residential areas. blic D. ~~~p apNpITIONS Commission 'tions had been offered at the ~ ~~~ the Planning lion er to No proffered condl resented to, and discussed roach the property own hearing, Mr. Gubala P ness to aPP otential p the Planning Commission. The following ar P roffers and i ested by a willing request the proffers sugg ssion: inting- proffers suggested by the Planning Cornmi autambile pa uses shall be prohibited from this siteb~y and fender work, 1• The following rebuilding, recondition ttery and figurines or other upholstering, repairing, manufacture of po and kilns truck repairing or overhauling%only previously pulverized clay, nts, toys, similar ceramic Products, using ,manufacture of musical instrumsfurniture or gasp and feed stores; cabinet, fired only by electricity ards; ber and metal stamps; seed novelties and rub sho s; commercial kennei~ ~k ~S erior runs an Y and upholstery and dry cleaning plus; f c~ccnercial laundry and buffering, § 21'92 of the Roanoke County 2, Comply with Type E screening Zoning Ordinance. restricted will be developed off of Route 601 and access will be 3, Anew access to Route 601. er linear foot of public street frontage 4. Signage limited to 1.5 sq.ft. P (maxim of 300 sq.ft•) for each business. sured at the oise levels at all times to less than 60 dbA when mea 5, Restrict n eration of any adjoining residential structure• construction and oP to dust mitigation measures during 6. EmP Y, on this site. industrial facility MOTION. Vl7rE AND ~~ n the formal receipt of the E. ~ISSIONF~Et' S moved to approve the petition contingent X11 call vote: ~. Massey a},~e proffers. The rmtion carried Wig the follaaing Ate; Massey, Gordon, Robinson, ~S; None ent to Affirm; Winstead designation from Developm moved to approve the land use map roll call vote: Mr. Massey The motion carried with the following principal Industrial. Witt Ate; Massey, Gordon, Robinson, ~S; None Affirm; Winstead F . DygSE[~ING PII2.SPECTIVE Norzie. G. A2TA~ " g 11") _ Concept Plan (8~" x 11") Vicinity Map (8~t • - Staff Report rington Secre - ~h~ Terrance untY P1 ing mission Roanoke ~~-~-'°~ STAFF REPORT ER: 37-11/89 PETITIONER: Board of 1989rvisorg CASE NUMB DATE: November 2, REVIEWED BY: Janet Scheid NATURE OF REQUEST arcel of 1. a. Unconditional request to rezone a sindustrial. land from R-1, Residential to M-1, he s ecific uses for this property are not known at this b' T p nest has been submitted to increase the time. The req County's inventory of industrial sites. 2. APPLICABLE REGUh~TIOdustrial District permits a wide a. The M-1 Lig automobile variety of industrial usesmanufacturing and painting and body repair, itals assembling products, veterinary hosp commercial kennels, and flea markets. b. c. d. e. The screening and buffering regulations Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance (Section apply to the development of this parcel Site plan review will be development on this site all County regulations. Stormwater of the 21-92) will of land. required for any future to ensure compliance with control regulations will be applied. A commercial/industrial entrance permit will beortation. required from the Virginia Department of Transp 3. SITE CHARACTERISTThSs parcel slopes upward away from Route a. Topography. flat on the top, and then slopes 601, is relatively gently downward towards Tinker Creek. arcel is covered with grass and b. Ground Covers This p reen trees. scattered large deciduous and everg ortion of this parcel c, Improvements: On the nortieda~ePd school house. On the of land is a vacant, dilap arcel is a tenant-occupied southeastern side of the p house with numerous outbuildings. 4. AREA CHARACTERISTICS = Situated within the Peters Creek a. Future GroPlanningrArea. The growth initiative for this Community rowth. area is to stimulate g ~~ l,~ -~ ~~ eral Area: The immediat es denti 1 ~geS w th medium- b• Gen industrial and low-densi y r built on the western side. density residences being g. LAND USE IMPACT ASSESSMENT Rate each factor according to the impact of the Rating: Use a scale of 1 through 5. proposed action act, 2 negligible impact 1 ~ positive imP 4 = disruptive impact, 3 = manageable impact, not applicable. g = severe impact, and N/A FACTOR COMMENTS RATING ment The 1965 Comprehensive Develop Comprehensive Plan: ment designa- 4 a' laced this area within the Develop to Plan has P ro riate designation according tion. This is an aPP P rescribed in the Comprehi^ the the land use determinants ublic facilities capacity There is adequate p for residential growth Plan. rovide area, water and sewer featu es 1(such as slope) P there is good, natural land ment, ortunity for residential develop optimum oPP or streets such as Plantation is direct acce~sRoadsa,and the area is within the and Hershberg urban service sector. amendment etitioner has filed a Land Use Map The P nation of this parcel of land to to change the desig conventional al Industrial. Small industries, Princip arks are three of the land industries, and industrial p e t pes the Comprehensive Plan finds to berehensivee us Y al Industrial areas. The Comp within Princip al Industrial rescribes the location of Princip Existing land Plan P to various factors: (1) been an areas according arcel has not historically velop_ Use Pattern - This p `~y~ioning The parcel industrial site bnitthe(2)aEXist~g industria ments__in the_ yici _ Y potential industrial site - is currently zoned R-1; (3) 4 Employ- •s arcel has been identifi industrials site;n ( 'n 19 , Ths P otentsal iggg, and 1989 as a P reviously, there are several ment centers - As stated P (g) Topography - e criteria; (b) Flood other industries in the vicini Y;ortion of this site is - This site is within The westernpp rotection hazard prevention lain; (7) Resource p ear flood p round- within the 100-y such as clean air anment of Valuable public resources, industrial develop - Adequate water water could be threatened Y this site; (6) Water and sewer servicrovements could and sewer is available off-site. Imp made; (9) Access - Route 601 is scheduled for be easily rovements in FY 92-93 and the site Road imp er Roads. The site Secondary is close to Plantation and Hers fr m a Private road (Lois be accessed only radii; can currently uate due to width and turning Lane) which is inadeq _ This site is within reason- (10) Transportation centers , drt and mayor street systems] able proximity to the airp il) Urban sector - This site is within the urban service area. Lands This parcel of land is surrounded by b, Surrounding industrial and residential uses. a mixture of commercial, are primarily light To the east, across Route 601, industrial sites with one re1idential site to the Wort - a low-density residential east. On the northern side neighborhood. To the west and across menteandrto the a residential develop reenhouse. On the new medium-density etitioners south is a residence and rocerty,cbetween the p southeast corner of the P s an existing residence. property and Route 601, the neighboring area to the hboring Areas In general, ment. The 3 c~ east across Route 601 is in indu residential and the south north and west are predominately is a mixture of residential and commercial use5'been out: The required concept plan has not 5 d. Site Lay submitted. N/A e. Architecture: Not available. e: The development of this site will 3 f. Screening and Landscap liance with the Roanoke Coun Y and have to be done in Section 21-92, "Type E , Screening Zoning Ordinance, Buffering. The required concept plan has not been 5 g, Amenities: submitted. Amenities can not be evaluate . Natural Features: Existing trees should be maintained. 3 h. TRAFFIC between Street Capacities: Route 601 (Hollins Road) S i. and Route 616 (Carlos DTove) Route 115 (Plantation Road) 829. had a 1986 average daily traffic c assume anyindustrial estimate potential traffic impact, uestion. The increase park is developed on the site in q er day. The •l traffic would be 3,409 vehicles p 'dents at the 3 in dai Y ores show 5 acct 1987-88 accident fig intersection of Routes 601 and 115 and one accident at e p ~,. ~ ~'~'• intersection of Routda~ bRcadnimprovementseinOFY192-93. ,,,,;~.-•- scheduled for Secon Y There is currently no public road access 4 j, Circulation: when to this site. Petitioner has indicated that, developed, this site would n e movements on Route 6010would Increased traffic and turns g adversely affect the residential areas to the north an `~ C1 d`~ south of this parcel of land. 3 3 3 3 3 UTILITIES water Water service is off-site. .The existing k. Waters uate to meet the requirements of the facilities are adeq proposed zoning. Extension on-site would be necessar and some minor upgrade may be required to meerequire high flow demands. Some industrial uses maY lane increased pressure blines from GarmanhDrivertonPlantation to extend the water exists for a water line of Road by 1992. The ability extension of either the Hollins Road system or City stem. Funding in the amount of 3550,000 Roanoke sY would be required for this. Sewer: Off-site. Extension of lines on site could be 1. accomodated. DRAINAGE basin. m. Basins This site is in the Tinker Creek drainage ortion of this parcel, along n. Floodplain: The western P ear floodplain. Tinker Creek, is in the 100-y PUBLIC SERVICES o. Fire Protections Site is within es ro ided to this e standards. Fire services cwaterbstandards are met site i f the Roan men tCoun ty with the develop 3 p. Rescue: Within established service standards. N/A q. Parks and Recreation: N/p r. Schools: TAX BASE N/A s. -Land and improvement value: -Taxable gross sales/year: -Total employees: ear: Unknown -Total revenue to the County/y ENVIRONMENT Since this is an unconditional request to rezone 4 t. Air: exists for significant point- to M-1, the possibility ollution impacts on the surrounding source air p idential areas. res u. Waters Since this is an unconditional request to rezone 4 ~~ ~ ~., exists for significant point- ta M-1, the possibility acts on the surrounding source groundwater pollution imp residential areas. oils: Stormwater control aCountysregulati ns•will 3 v• S 1 with Roanoke have to comp Y uest to rezone 4 w. Noise: Since this is an unconditionalnificant noise to M-1, the possibility exists for sig ollution impacts on the surrounding residential areas. p arcel must limit 3 Signage; Each business lot er oneslinear foot of x• ware feet p uare Signage to 1.5frontage, up to a maximum of 300 sq public street feet. 6. PLAN CONSISTENCY Hated as Development. Petitioner desig a the designation This area is `and Us 1 Map amendment to Chang with the has f i 1 ed a to Principal Industrial to achieve consis enc proposed zoning. industrial There are several other existing 7. STAFF EVAL~hSION This site was a. sitesgon the east side of Route 601. included in the 1981, 1985, and 1989 industrial site studies. nessess There are numerous sthatutherekissnosconcepts b. Weak them is the.. petition foremost among at the very least, plan to evaluate. There is, - potential for serious impacts__on the sur_roun ' ermitted hborhoods if some of the uses which are p -neig - are developed on this site. by right, in the M-1 District, is is an unconditional petition which offers no restric- Th For example, an industrial businessandhat tions on use. ainting, truck repairs, and body nificant noise impacts on the does automobile p acts and fender work would have slgalso air pollution imp neighborhood and possibly aesthetic impacts. etitioner should proffer to ested proffers: (1) The p the c. Sugg on this site, exc~ a from allowable M-1 uses, airing, following: ainting, upholstering, rep * Automobile p body and fender rebuilding, reconditioning, work, truck repairing or overhauling ottery and figurines or other * Manufacture of p roducts, using only pre- similar ceramic p and kilns fired only viously pulverized clay, by electricity or gas toys, * Manufacturanafrubberaandnmetalestamps novelties * Seed and feed stores ~~~~~ i '~ furniture and upholstery shops * Cabinet, ards * Commercial kennels a~dhdryt~leaningn plantsy * Commercial laundry * Flea markets 1 with "Type Petitioner should proffer to comp Y of the Roanoke (2~, and buffering, Section 21-92, roffer to E screening Petitioner should p County Zoning Ordinance; t3) a new access point off of Ro(4~ Petitioner sshould develop for each business ublic street and to ltollimit s g~ 9e oute 6 ; proffer care feet per linear foot of P 5) To parcel to 1.5 to a maximum of 300 square feet; frontage, up ate noise levels associate to r strict dnoise alevels, mitig roffer the petitioner should P when measured at the at all times, to less than 60 dB(A(~b) Petitioner should adjoining residential structation measures during proffer to employ dust mitig struction and operation of any industrial facility on con this site. ., .. RoANORE Cody REZONING APPLICATION 1. Owner's Address: Name : ~Ir I P.t~ DDS k' ` - /~.~'~'' ~ ~ ~ ~,~..~,~- (~o~~v~t UA~ 2yo~ 2 X15 H~S~~'~ ~.. , 2, Applicant's Name: ~(~ ~~~,c,i,ye~S Phone Address: A 11 rH S Gam., 3. Location of Property: ' / 2 Number (s) : 7 . ~ Tax Map ~/ 4. Magisterial District: erty : ,~y ~ 5 a vl,Cs 5. Size of Prop - ~ ~ 2_ 6. Existing Zoning: Existing Land Use /s'~~~ - 7. Proposed Zoning: Proposed Land g. Comprehensive Use: Plan Designation: eat? Yes No With This Requ g. Are Conditions Proffered of your applica- offering proffers 2l memb~ot the Planning (If you are voluntarily ~,rriting. offers.) tion, these Proffers must be ~ ation of these pr Staff can assist you in the P~F~ ~n_ Value of Land and (Proposed) 11. Buildings: The Following Items MulicaetionWill NotlBe Check If gnclosed.O=Plncomplete: Items Are Kissing Letter of Application tion Metes and BounAttach Ex ibit A) of Property Application Fee lication '-"- Water and Sewer App Vale KeC.! Received By: Case No.: Ord. No.: ~-l~"/ ayo-a~ S~~ ~- Phone: 7o3IlGS~ Z~08 This Appli~tion. Please Accepted If Any Of These Concept Plan List of Adjacent _ Vicinity Map Written licable) (I f App Contract Purchaser, Owners nature Of Property Owner, 12. sig . Or Owner's Agen 9 ~Z,~ d4 C~ Date ~~1_ Signature 1. 1~~~'~ AN ,I. z ' 18 ~ 88 aFSOUICEMTENNIP~ A Bcewi~lBcginning TO: FROM: DATE: gUBJECT: ~~~~~ Terry Harrington, Director, Planning and Zoning~~ is Development1l/~f Timothy Gubala, Director, Econom September 25, 1989 Rezoning application - Friendship Manor, Inc. an On behalf of the Board of f Pa rvroximat ly a54 . i1 acres gfrom This prop application for the rezoning PP erty Residential District R-1 to Indusa t of the 1989 study of potential is one of several evaluated as P the Board of Supervisors. industrial sites that was initiated by lication Please note that the Concept Plan and water and sewer aPPro erty. are not included because uStrerecede the detailed s to planning. Rezoning of the property m P Proffered conditions are as follows: 1. o erty will not include permitted uses for: The pr p u holstering, repairing, rebuilding, a. Automobile painting, P truck repairing, reconditioning, body and fender work, or overhauling; b, Manufacture of pottery and figurines or other similar ceramic products; c, Veterinary hospital and commercial kennels with exterior runs and yards; d, Flea markets, unless a special exception has been granted by the Board of Supervisors. e, Seed and feed stores. A new access point will be developed from Hollins Road to 2• ro ert . provide access to the p P Y Please advise me with your comments and questions. Thank you. Attachment P.O. BOX 29800 • ROANOKE . VIRGINIA 24018-0798 • (703) 772-2069 FAX. NO.: (703) 772-2030 SEP 25 ]989 DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT E'LAS~"~Ir?~, I.~+ ~~~u ~ u-itltilTS R~~;3~k1: c~~~m MSMORPiNDIIM ~~= r ~I~~tYt~ ~~~~~~~~~~= ~~ ~ ~~.~, J DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPM SEP ~5 1989 TO: FROM: DATE: ~~,~(~ ~~h3~ ~itriif~i7[ 0 ~i,~iir~J M B M O R A ld D D M R~f.~~t~~ ~~~ Ti Terry Harrington, Director, Planning and Zoning ' ector, Economic Development~/~( Timothy W. Gubala, Dir September 21, 1989 BOB1$CT. Hollins Road n Amendment for Friendship Manor, Inc. on Background: ro erty since 1987. Roaaokoetential Friendship Manor has owned the p P ervisors amend Economic Development staff eded that the Board of SuPng P ould be industrial site and recommen ro erty so that it c the Comprehensive Plan and rezone tm nt. P used for future industrial develop It is requested thatal Industrial. Development to Princip lan Amendment: e ested Land Us hensive Plan be amended from Effect oz LiIC ~•«~~~------ site lies above Old Hollins Roaod•ert crtosthe south includessa The are several industrial usesree~ouse. Property to the west across residence and a commercial g e lot residential rg screening should be Carvin's Creek isoar~ri si Bu fering and existing acent uses lie to the n ro osed industrial use from adj maintained to protect the P P oint should be developed that residential areas. A new access from residential uses. will keep industrial traffic away Reasons for the Amendment: is deficient in "ready to go" industrial sites The Roanoke Valley fer to prospective industrial c ervisorss adopted strategysfo to of the Commonwealth. The Board of Sup a industrial site development Fy 89-90 is to take action to encourag water and sewer extensions changes in land use and zoning, Opportunities for public- through a highway planning. and long rang e artnerships exist to implement site development by t e privat p private sector. P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE . VIRGINIA 24018-0798 (703> 772-2069 FAX. NO.: (703) 772-2030 A B~an,i~fQcginning av~-a S i 1 s i i i Road s Road (Route 601) is scheduled for Secondary Old Hollin 92_98 to handle increas ed a on ffiic ae elopme t improvementamentFY Improvements will enhanc the road.. area develop rtunities on other vacant industrial tracts a °ng ent can be °pp° site developm Since this site ins in single ownersh p. ed in a positive manner. This site is best controlled and ma 9 e industrial users. used .for one or two larg e Amendment: went along Old ustificat•on f Use atter - Industrial develop 'st' a Land Hollins Road. Residential along the west side of Old Holl ns F ~st;na Zoning Road and Industrial on the east. ed within the 1981 and 1985 - Includ initiated by the Board po ential Industrial Site ae~ ~~thin the 1989 study studie ervisors~.1MU`~ of Sup a criteria land use - Site is within the 10$ slop o a h determinant. Current 1 -Water supply is off site in Hollins Road. a tank Water supp v rovements at the Belleview ~ p,dnew waters line is water storage imp will increase pressures for industrial users. nd from AMP on Hollins Road to Plantation Road by proposed to exte 1992. e i e - Across Old Hollins Road and in Tinker Cree o erty wer s - A new access point should be located to serve the rr cress from Old Hollins Road.~v to Plantation Road. T ansportation Center - Close proximity n secto -Property is within Urban Service Sector. ba .__ ~- ~~'~ - ~. ~~~~ Site name:- Friendship Manor Sizs: 54 acres Zoning: Comprehens iv4 '. Place Designation: ' Access. 1 i Water: t Sewer: Availability: Recommendation: Fiscal Impact: ~ .. Development Hollins Road oi! site pfd site, across road owners are willing to sell site for Property industrial use. Amend Comprehensive Plan to Principal Industrial. to M1. Rezone property Complete Heriline to improve pressure. Sxtend wat 1992 for water improvementsi 1992-93 !or VDT improvements . -~ N _ _ 1J ~'~ ... wy M I .. ~ =. - •.-~= .. ~ - r L!' _~ g T H U 1 - ~ p - 2 Z 111 ~~~ 'i'L7 II~`.~'~1-hcr~;c:r Ruud, ;V•«t• Ru~ululr.. Vh';:fttla 2~{t112 f'h~ttc TO3 2ti;~-ZlUt1 lax 7U3 2Ga-?Ol{fZ February 22, 1990 ~ ' Harrington, Director ~. Terry planning and Zoning • Roanoke County P• 4, Box 29800 Roanoke VA 24018-0798 '~ Dear Mr. Harrington: to the . fallowing conditions t~.tiari cf 54.14 I voluntarLlY Proffer the ervisors initiated P Rollins goad. Board of Sup Manor, z'~c • on Roanoke County Friendship . acres of land owned by a allowed: ~,• following permitted uses will not b ~~ 1, The •~ flea markets cleaning a. commErcial laundries and dry . ~~ b• kennels c, commercial seed and feed stQttery~ etc. d. . ~ e. manufacture ofa r, etc. ;, f • automobile reP residential- uses. .~ a nE~~ screening where adjacent to 2. TYF decibels when measured at levels to be limited to 60 3• Noise and. adjacent residence. site development ' ti ation measures during . 4• Dust mi g construction. uestions. ~~. Please call me if you have any q Sincerely, • . vp,I,LEY MANAGEMENT, INC. . Steph n Rice president l ' c~ ~~ REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF NTY EADMINISTRATION CENTER,NTY AT A VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE CO 1990 TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 27- ORDINANCE TO AMENDOFTHAEppROX Mp,TELYD 54 E ACRES Mpp DESIGNATION LOCATED WEST OF HO gLIMNp,SGISTER AL DIOSTRICT FO LANE IN THE HOLLIN DEVELOPMENT TO PRIC~SSIFICATIONR R 1 TOD THE CHANGE THE ZONING ZONING CL,p,SSIFIC SESO UPON THE APPLICATION FOF INDUSTRIAL PURPO THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA. Resolution 91289-4 the Board of Supervisors of WHEREAS, by oke County, Virginia, initiated amendments to the Comprehensive Roan an and to the classifications of certain real estate located in Pl Roanoke County to serve the public purposes of the County as eneral welfare, and ublic necessity, convenience, q required by p ood zoning practice to implement the recommendations of the g Economic Development Action Plan for FY 1989-90; and held on WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was October 24, 1989, and the second reading and public hearing was held on December 19, 1989; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on November 9, 1989; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the Future Land Use Plan map designation of a certain 54 acres, as describ tract of real estate containing approximately herein, owned by Friendship Manor and located west of Hollins ed ad and south of Lois Lane in the Hollins Magisterial District be Ro ~9d-~ changed from Development to Principal Industrial; and of real 2. That the zoning classification of a certain tract containing approximately 54 acres, as described herein, estate Friendship Manor and located west of Hollins Road and owned by is hereby south of Lois Lane in the Hollins Magisterial District, Single-Family changed from the zoning classification of R1, ' ential District, to the zoning classification of M1, Light Resid Industrial District. 3, That the Board initiated the application to change the ehensive Plan. and the zoning classification of this real Compr ur oses of estate located in Roanoke County to serve the public p P convenience, general the County as required by public necessity, fare and good zoning practice to implement the recommendations wel of the Economic Development Action Plan for FY 1989-90' writing licant has voluntarily proffered in 4. That the app following conditions which the Board of Supervisors hereby the accepts: following permitted uses will not be allowed: a, The i, flea markets cleaning commercial laundries and dry ii . iii. commercial kennels iv. seed and feed stottery~ etc. manufacture of P v, etc. vi. automobile repair, ~~E~~ screening where adjacent to residential b. Type uses. 60 decibels when to be c, Noise levels r sidence ~ measured at adjacent itigation measures during site development and t d, m Dus construction. id real estate is more fully described as follows: 5. That sa f t~ ~ ~~~-~ in set in the right-of-way line of Beginning at an iron p~ Old Route 115); thence State Route 601 ( o , ~~ Hollins Road, line of Hollins Road, S. 8 54 20 with the right-of-way g° 23' 40" W. 467.04 feet; W, 227.38 feet; thence S• 110 50' 54" W., a tangent of thence on a curve bearing S• 759,65 feet, an arch 286.36 feet on a radius of 2, of S. 14° distance of 570.67 feet, with a chord bearingto an iron 19' 7•• W,, and a cord distance of David Wf Hinman; thence pin at the corner to property with the Hinman line S. 45° 44' W. 347.33 to an iron pin set; thence N. 380 45' 00~~ W• 196.00 feet to an iron pin set; thence S. 30045' UU~~ E. 67.50 feet to an iron pin set; thence S. 590 15~ ~~ 42,00 feet to an iron pin set; thence N. 40 22 00 E• o ~ ~~ 14.00 feet to an ironop~n set; thence S. 49 38 00 E• thence S. 41° 00" W. 351.25 feet to a corner p W. set; with the Hinman line N. 32° 30' 30" thence continuing in set in the line of Raymond thence 1,122.00 feet to an iron p B. and Hamner W. Meador near a 36-inch 304.38afeet to a with the Meador line N. 390 23' 40'~ E• 115.5 feet to an iron pin; post; thence N. 1° 03' 00" W• thence N. 83° 35' 00" W. 107ated in the middle of Tinker property of H. H. Meador loc Meador continuing H' 150.00 o ~ ~~ Creek; thence with Tinker Creek N. 8 36 40 W. upstream bisecting ° 23' 20" E. 100 feet to a feet to a point; thence N• to a p oint; thence N. 12° 23' 20" E. oint; thence 417.Oa P oint in the median line of Tinker Creek, feet to a P of Ethel B. Stokes; thence continuing corner to property 15° 59' 40" E. 207.95 upstream bisecting Tinker Creek N. feet to a point; thence N• 894fe t toOanEiron pins set at thence N. 0° 22' 00 E. 130. the base of a 36" sycamore tree on the bank °S heirsr Creek in the property line of Mattie B. Sowd~ ° 42' 00" thence with the line of the Dowdy heirs, E. 123.75 feet to an iron pin set; thence S. 79° 12' 00" E. 300.30 feet to an iron pin set adjacent to the edge of an old farm road; thence continuing with the line of heirs and property of James G. and Marian F. the Dowdy o ~ ~~ 342.70 feet to an iron pin set Kelly, S. 69 42 00 E. Nichols and at the corner of properties of Minnie odes; thence Josephine L. Showalter and Ester S• S, 220 continuing with the line of Showalter and Rhe of beginn- 28' 00" W. 515.70 feet to the point and p 52.11 acres as shown a plat of survey ing; containing re ared by Buford T. Lumsden and dated March 2, 1976, P P ex ress- Associates, C.L.S., to which referencaescript ion of the ly made for a more particularly property herein expressed. 6. That the effective date of this ordinance shall be February 27, 1990. .~ ~~ AppEARANCE REQUEST ~`~~~ AGENDA ITEM NO• ~~,; S ~ __ ~~ ,, e ~ ~ r SUBJECT ~ Su e~isors to = . the Chairman of the Board ° e above matter I would like the ublic hearing on ~ ODIUM, nine me during ED TO THE P recog y~FIEN CALL so that I may cowmen AND ADD~Sg FOR THE VE MY NAME I WILL GI GUIDELINES . RD, I AGREE TO ABIDE B RECO LIS'T'ED BELOw• ' utes to com1rient , • s esker will be given between thre resentativ~ 'T'he chairman will Each p as an individual or rep .. Baking on an issue, whether s eak~ng ~ of the Board to . ~e time limit based on the nib d bf h ma ority decide and will enforce the rule unless instru-cte y do otherwise. Dint of view only. Ques- resentatiob o~ee~a~an. • Speakers will be li nintiead be entertained y bons of clarificatio Y , e Board. Debate between a recognized • All comments mast be directe~t~°s not allowed. speaker and audience membe es at all times. • eskers and the audience will exercise court Y ents Both sp ested to leave any written statements and/or comet • Speakers are requ with the clerk. O SPEAK FQR ~ ORGANI~O ,LION • IN'pNIDUALS pUgpORTING T TTEN AU'I'HORIZA 'T'HE CLERK W'~ GROUP SFIALL FILE WITH NG .~ INDIVIDUAL. TO RPPRESENT FROM 1'HE GROUP ALLOWI THEM• CLERK GIVE TO DEP PLEASE PRIN'T' LEGIBL ,Q .~ ~ NAME ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ f c~ ~ c ADDRESS PHONE ~~ ~~~ _~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 27, 1990 ORDINANCE 22790-6 TO AMEND THE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION OF APPROXIMATELY 105 ACRES LOCATED BETWEEN ROUTE 11/460 AND CARSON ROAD IN THE HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM DEVELOPMENT TO PRINCIPAL INDUSTRIAL AND TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION FROM RE TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION M1 WITH CONDITIONS UPON THE APPLICATION OF THE BOARD OF SUPER- VISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY WHEREAS, by Resolution 91289-4 the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, initiated amendments to the Comprehensive Plan and to the classifications of certain real estate located in Roanoke County to serve the public purposes of the County as required by public necessity, convenience, general welfare, and good zoning practice to implement the recommendations of the Economic Development Action Plan for FY 1989-90; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on December 19, 1989, and the second reading and public hearing was held on February 27, 1990; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on January 3, 1990; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the Future Land Use Plan map designation of a certain tract of real estate containing approximately 105 acres, as described herein, owned by Fralin & Waldron Inc. and located between Route 11/460 and Carson Road in the Hollins Magisterial District be changed from Development to Principal Industrial; and 2. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing approximately 105 acres, as described herein, owned by Fralin & Waldron Inc. and located between Route 11/460 and Carson Road in the Hollins Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of RE, Residential Estate District, to the zoning classification of M1, Light Industrial District. 3. That the Board initiated the application to change the zoning classification of this real estate located in Roanoke County to serve the public purposes of the County as required by public necessity, convenience, general welfare, and good zoning practice to implement the recommendations of the Economic Development Action Plan for FY 1989-90. 4. That the applicant has voluntarily proffered in writing the following conditions which the Board of Supervisors hereby accepts: a. The property will not include permitted uses for: i. Manufacture of pottery and figurines or other similar ceramic products; ii. Veterinary hospital and commercial kennels with exterior runs and yards; iii. Outside flea markets, unless a special excep- tion has been granted by the Board of Supervisors. b. That all locational signage [Sec. 21-93(D)] will be aesthetically pleasing and be no more than forty (40) square feet in sign face and no more than eight (8) feet in height. Outdoor advertising signs (billboards) will be prohibited. c. That all utilities will be underground. d. That there will be no on-street parking. e, That there will be sufficient truck loading spaces designed for each building site, as necessary. f. That the Petitioner will evaluate the drainage situation for the subject tracts and implement a design for drainage facilities to either retain or detain the two (2) year storm (as required by Roanoke County) and the retention or detention for a ten (10) year storm. g. That primary access to the property will be limited to Route 460. h. Building placement and parking will be designed to not impede the future widening of one additional lane along Routes 460 and 758. i. Should out-parcels be subdivided along Route 460 frontage (Parcel A), access will be provided via an internal road network plan utilizing the existing median cut on Route 460. j, Type E (Option 2) buffer and screening requirements will be provided between Parcel "A" and single- family residences. All Roanoke County screening and buffering requirements will be implemented as specific development occurs. ]c. Existing tenttallowingpforefeasibleldevelopment of to the ex the subject parcel. 1. All inte ed to VDOT standards forlfuture dedications construct m. Dust mitigation controls will be implemented during site excavation activities. n. The developer will cooperate with the Roanok utility Utility Department to provide necessary Y easement(s) for a sanitary sewer submain along Route 758 (Carson Road) at a mutually agreed upon loca- tion. 5. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: Parcel 1 BEGINNING at a point on the southerly line of U. S. Route 460 (Variable R/W), said point being the northwesterly corner of property now or formerly James L• Si°nezof (D.B. 764, page 596); thence with the southerly U. S. Route 460, the f N 1 540 06f 105" Els 102 19• feet; No 48' 15" E. 583.03 feet, 58° ' 40" E. 260.62 feet3 ~~ 153.33 feet; N. 23 Dint, being on the 29° 3 0~ 10~ E • ~~ E • 321.02 feet tO Reformed Presbyterian N. 36 07 10 of Valley same, the line of property512); thence with the feet; westerly 1105, Page 42° 23' 30" E. 367.84 the Church (D•B• S. Dint in 47° wo di 3 an E s' 605.02 feet to a P the following 36 the same, and N • the 28° w 1 r' 05" E • 40.86 center of Virginia Route 758, S. following eleven distances thence with a curved line to curve; and whose chord feet to a point of 385.08 feet, 33° ' 25" E. 76.57 feet, an the left, whose radius is 53 thence with bearing and distance is S• 837.10 feet, rc distance of 76.70 feet to another curVe3 ' ht, whose radius is 3° 30' 40,E E' a a curved line to the r and distance is S. gl feet to another and whose chord bearing ht, whose an arc distance line? to the rig and 177,48 feet, a curved whose chord bearing curve; thence with feet, feet, an arc is 6197.83 ° 37' 40„ E, 172.77 thence with a radius is S. 26 distance 78 feet to another curvei 369.04 feet, of 172. whose radius is 15° 14' 05" distance to the right and distance is S• curved line of 136.48 feet to a and whose chord bearing Dint; 70 feet, an° arcs 25't E c 70.83 feet to a p E• 135. 04 38 whose radius is point; thence Cued line to the lef and distance is S' thence with a feet 80.22 236.27 feet, and whose chord bearing feet to a o ~ 00~~ E. 79.84 feet ,° an ar40d1E a 161 ~ " whose 14 22 thence S. 24 05 to the left, to a point; a curved line bearing and point; thence with whose chord _ is 409' 39° feet, anE. 224.47 feet, an °a54 ~ d10~~ radius 59 55 thence S. 55 distance is S• to a point; ed line to tance of 227.38 feet Dint; thence with a cure 421.97 feet, and whose ch°an E, 133.15 feet to a P ~~ 110.65 feet, the right, whose radius is 48° 22, 10 E, feet to a point; thence leaving bearing and distance is S• line of arc distance of 110.97and with the northerly S. 61° inia Route 758, D.B. 1285, Page 1528) 53, 05" Virg thence S• property of Roanoke County Dint; line of Otis 06' 54" W. 201.30 fee ai °t on the northerly thence with E. 100.00 feet to a P D.B. 467, page 252)' thence S. C, Chamber o~ et 54;, W, 336.77 feet to a oI° the aforesaid same, S. 06 feet to a point 31° 49' 10" E. 740.29 the same, the following 758; thence with 70 feet; S. 21 230 ~ W. 10 Virginia Route S. 03 10" four distances:94 feet; with a curved line to the right- 12' S0" W• 172 and whose chord bearing and 83 feet, feet, arc dis o ~ 45n W• 139.70 47° 26' 40" whose radius S s 34 7 '19 thence S . distance is feet to a point; foot waterline tance of 140.93 centerline of a 20 Dint; crossing the in all 417.95 feet to a thence W'- 268.90 feet, to a point; ° easement a51° 57' 30„ W, 232.09 feet thence S. 81 thence N. feet to a point; with the ° 43' S0" W. 294.09 Dint; thence 5. 86 ~~ 179.24 feet to a P J• Bower, et ux. (D.B. 46' 55 W• ro erty of I. northerly line of p P to a point 67° 22' S0" W. 942.82 feet Ewen (D.B. 712, page 302). S' now or formerly Joel ~ 0 35' 00„ W• on line of property thence N. ro erty 737, Roanoke City): line of p P 1449, Page Dint on the southerly thence with the 565.59 feet to a P g96, page 719) : 01° 29' Waldrond (D•B• feet; thence N• of Jack ° , 00~~ E, 201.70 the northerly same, N• 71 16 Dint; thence with 07 feet 30" W. 1347.57 feet to a P S. 790 ' 35 W. 268. 29 contain- line of aforesaid Sinningl /and known as Tract A- a of Dr. to the place of beg shown on a sure Yerties, ing 104.27 acres, as mOforf Fralin & Waldron Prop erty Land Surveyor- dated August Richard Lowe Prof Lang, prepared by Robert S• 1988' wide non-exclusive that certain 60-foot Reformed TOGETHER with of Trustees of Vaeaeby Richard easement across property as resew terian Church of America, in deed recorded in Deed Book 1253, Pag Presby g. Lowe, Jr., 74. Pare s ide of U . S . Route BEGINNING at a Point on the southerly with the R W) at its intersece iCOn tinuinge center 460 (Variable / thenc 12 22° ~ 55 E line of Virginia Route 758% 758, S. inia Route of Virginia Route Virg centerline Dint; thence leaving Dint; thence N• 241.32 feet to a ~p 163.89 feet to a P southerly S. ° 20~ 54 W• Dint on the 19°103' 10'~ W• 244.90 feet to a P the same, N. 54° 20' thence with inning, and known side of U. S. Route 460; shown to the Place of Beg fully 30" E. 150.00 feet 0.846 acre, as more erty for as Tract B, containing of Dr. Richard Lowe PrOP Lang, repared by Robert S . on the aforesaid Surveyties, P Fralin & Waldro dat d August 1988. Land Surveyor, tive date of this ordinance shall be Februar 6 . That the of f ec 27, 1990. and carried by the following On motion of Supe~isor Johnson, recorded vote: Nickens, Robers Supe~isors McGraw, Johnson, AYES: NAYS: Supe~isor Eddy p, COPY TESTE ~• Mary H. Allen, Clerk Board of Supe~isors Roanoke County ment & Inspections cc: File Director, Develop Arnold Covey ton, Director, Planning Terry Harring Real Estate Assessment John Willey, DirectorAttorney Paul Mahoney, County PETITIONER: ROANORE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS (LOWE) CASE NUMBER: 2-1/90 Planning Commission Hearing Date: January 3, 1990 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: February 27, 1990 A. REQUEST Petition of Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Plan map designation of approximately 105 acres Industrial and to rezone said property from development, located between Route 11/460 Magisterial District. ~ ~ -.,~- to amend the Future Land Use from Development to Principal R-E to M-1 for industrial and Carson Road, Hollins B. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION There was no opposition to the request. C. SIGNIFICANT IMPACT FACTORS owner has not proffered any condition 1. Site Layout: Although the property to site layout, a concept plan has been submitted for staf relating lan illustrates a mixed use development with bot a review. The concept p commercial and industrial land uses. The site would be ro erty owne internal roadway which would access onto US 460. The p P advises the proposed roadway will be built to state standards ando ert dedicated as public right-of-way. Staff recommends the p P mately owner proffer the submitted co thetsite could be pro ided from eeither is 2. Circulation: Direct accessaccess from Carson Road, primary or secondary 460/11 or Carson Road. Any roadway. Staff is discouraged since it coffer conditions ensuring that access will ~ recommends the petitioner p ro erty ownE only gained from US 460. Staff further recommends the P P in frog restrict access to one point at the existing median cut directly ro erty owner has advised staff that he wi. of the site. (The p P participate in the construction of a traffic signal outparcelsccreat~ Access to the proposed industrial parcels and/or any within the commercial area, should be provided via the interaeveloame or by a frontage road along US 460. Based on existing P standards, in the event of futurwou dd be proh bited,site, additional cu cuts or driveways along US 460 im ac 3. Noise: Site design shou nd bothuthe construct onmandgoperation pha~ associated with noise duri g site design should to of any future use of this site. For example, where feasible, advantage of existing topography and vegetation, mitigate the effect of noise and coffer cond tions ensu r ng that sot suggests that the property owner p levels do not exceed 60 dba when measured at adjoining residences. D. PROFFERED CONDITIONS ermitted uses for: manufacture of potty 1. The property will not include p and figurines or other similar ceramic prod ards;v outside flea pmarke commercial keels with exterior runs and Y the Board of Superviso unless a special exception has been gr wiled be aesthetically pleasing 2. All locational signage [Sec. 21-93(D)] be no more than 40 sq. ft. in sins billboards)n w 11 berprohibited t. height. outdoor advertising sig 3. All utilities will be underground. 4. There will be no on-street parking. s aces designed for each build 5. There will be sufficient truck loading p site, as necessary. ;_. ;-y -"`l „~ s ~Le ..s the subject tracts e situation for or detain will e facilities to eita edr thearetention or etitioner evaluate the drainag 6, The p a design for drainag Roanoke County) and implement aS required by 460. ear storm ( to Rou ede the future the two Y for a 10 year storm- yaill be limit~o not imp detention to the property designed rimary access arking will be 460 and 758• ~, The p Routes frontage (Parcel A)- g, Building placement and p Route 460 utilizing the of one additional lane al an ong widening arcels be subdivided hould out-p •ded via an internal road network P a 11 be Provided 9• S will be prove 460• requirements wi County access cut on Route All Roanoke existing median buffer and screening as specific option 2- le family residencei:mPlemented 10. ~ tWeeri Parcel A and si requirements will be allowing screening and buffering ed to the extent arcel A will be preserv VDOT development occurs. ect parcel. constructed to 11. Existing oak trees °ment of the subj designed and for feasible deve oP during site excavation thoroughfares will be 12. All internal future dedication. be implemented standards for controls will Department mitigation Utility submain 13. Dust the Roanoke County Sealer activities. cooperate with for a sanitary 14. The developer will utility easement(s) a reed upon location. to provide 758s~~ar5on goad) at a mutually g along Route ment to VOTE AND REASON designation from Deve CaP11 vote ~ MOTIONr use map roll • E~ COMMIggIONER S a rove the land the following Mr. Massey moved to PP The motion carried with al Indus gobs son, Massey, Gordon Princip Witt- AYES- Winstead NAYS: None coffered conditions. ABSENT: est with p to approve the rezoninroii ~ 11 vote' Mr. Massey moved the following • carried with Massey, Gordon The motion Robinson, AYES: Witt, NAYS: Winstead ABSENT: None ment plat ELATING PERSPECTIVE osal is not a coordinated d the oCounty wee g DI88 ublic policy; that if rudent p would be undertaken a~ Mr. Winstead on g d Shnot ae P cop a corridor study consistent basis. that the rez ment- u dated on a serious abo ord nancei and maps would be P the zoning '1 Vicinity Map Concept Plan - Other G. ATTACHMENTS: Staff Report - /~ ~/~ . .~. ~-- - arring n, Secretary Terrance lanning Commission Roanoke, ounty ~~j~ STAFF REPORT ervisors PETITIONERS Board of Sup January 3, 1990 CASE NUMBERS 2-1/90 ~1-~ DATES VIEWED BY: Dale Castellow v" RE Supervisors to ameno tDevelopmentato Board of 105 acres fr E to M_1 for Petition of Roanoke County roximatelY erty from R- Use Plan map designation otoarezone said prop d between Route 11/460 and Carson Road, 1 Industrial and Principal ment, locate industrial deveisterial District. the Hollins Mag OF REQUEST 105 acres from 1, NATURE approximately request to rezone to accommodate Unconditional 1 Light Industry a• The land owner use Residential Es~oWth in Roanoke County• a mixed R'E' illustrates land future industrCOncept plan which and industrial submitted a both commercial on the northern development containing would be concentrated uses Commercial uses 460, while the industrial uses. U•S• half of the site althe rear closest to Carson Roa • would be located to a variety of 2• AppLICABLE REGULATIONS District permits and Industry assemb y of appliances The M-1- Light including a• land uses of products from Ceram cs- industrial devices, manufacturing as Well as warehousiis electronic materials, a special exception plastics and other similar Provided uses, hospitals. eneral commerciaof area and veterinary ervisors, 9 supportive granted by the Board of Sup directly day care centers Well. including are permitted as industrial facilities, such an array of industrial 1 district permits owner proffer conditithe Since the M- ro erty Staff recommends staff recommends thofpthe site. uses, future use which limit coffer restrictions for: property owner p repairing, ainting upholsteria d fender work, 1, automobile p body rebuilding, reconditioning. truck repairing or overhauling%roducts from leather, manufacturing or assembling of p with 2• or straw; commercial kennels material hospital and g• veterinary and Yards; exterior runs 4• flea market; or 5• seed and feed store. owner proposes to include reta request a the property commercial Although the petitioner has not submitte uses on this tract-tion to permit the accompanying ecial excep ecial exception can be submitted at for a sp the sp to the Board land uses. Although submitted directly date, it is typically In light of a later planning Commission wBiol rd of review th s of Supervisors. The do so by the limit this directed to the petitioner request unless staff recommends this procedure arcels targeted for industrial developmen rezoning to those p ~'~ ~' Hated for commercialn$u~eshould be rezone that appropriate Those parcels desig This wouldto each section of the B_2, General Commercialare applied development standards development. this site, ro osal is submitted fO liance with development P P ensure OomP rocess, 0 b. In the event a lan review P site plan review would b art of the site p ortion of regulations. As P County owner may be required to delineate any the property oodway that may be situated on this tract. the Glade Creek fl with some slope along both 3, SITE CHARACTERISTICS ently rolling A small knoll Topography' S1te is g ro erty boundaries. a. ro osed entrance to the the Wort ed al 5 Uughe460pnear the p P is locat site. e is unimproved with scattered trees and ow Ground Cover: Sit b. growing vegetation. 4, AREA CHARACTERISTICS a. Future Grprea, Planning Priority: Situated natednasha this has been desig Bonsac~ wthmareay high g developed with rural residential, land uses. b. General area is and commercial 5 , LAND USE R Pt C each Efactor Rating Use a scale of 1 action. impact, 2 1 a positive act, 5 4 disruptive imp RATING 2 a. agricultural act of the proposed according to the imp through 5• act, 3 negligible imp and severe impact, COMMENTS = manageable impact, N/A ~ not applicable. FACTOR LAND USE COMPATIBILITY = 1985 Comprehensived D Velopm nt land use Comprehensive Plan located along U.S. placed this area n rthern half not the sstthe southern half is categories. The wherea from R-E, 460, is designated Transit The/ proposed rezoning Light Industry is inconsistent with designated Development. uidelines specified indOes Residential Estates trinaipals, and g the land use typeS~ P ed within a t categorY• The Transition lan develop tegor uses when clustered or olicies Developmen encourage retail but does not include simi ardesirable planned shopping center, ustrial uses. Land uses identified as being for ind Hated as Development itivitY Centers suchsas within areasdensities and community ac of varYinChurches and recreational facilities. schools, nesting an the petitioner is req ensure compatibility, nation tO amendment amendment of the Futursi Land Use Plan des g To s of the proposed land use Industrial. An analy d ^~ ~ {/ eterminants for Principal Industrial on the land use d based has been areas is included below. of industry attern large lot rural Land Use Pattern:The general area is uestion 1• Existing this area. The tract in q established with limited agriculture. residentroved. zoned R-E, is unimP is Presently the site The property roposes to rezone Existing Zoning= petitioner.P the future the land 2• At some time in to accommodate Residentialh~si austrY• special exception to M-1, lig to Pursue a owner Proposes uses. accompanying Commercial this site has for future industrial al Industrial Sites: ~ otential °ccas onsustrial sites 3• potenti as having P of potential ind been mentioned both identified Inventories in 1985 and 1989 development. Roanoke County conducted by a viable industrial location. intensive this site as there are no labor Centers: Although it is located al of the 4• Employment the staff the immediea t v~ountyY/where several industries in in has identified U•S, 460 corriEconomic Development Department of sites. potential industrial with some slope along the is gently rolling o raphY; Site oundaries. Petitioner hat UdSis460swi11 5• Top g ro erty The northern and southern the northern P P to the site. the knoll located along Tess and egress slope criteria specified in the land use be removedthin the 10tate ing site is wi ortion determinants. h a smal~he flood It appears as thong 6. Flood Hazard trealongo Glade Creek is located within of the proper Y plain boundary. or historical No known archaeological Resource Protection: this site. ~, identified on Utilities, resources have been ,s Department of county S• 460 Corridor Per the the entire U• Water SuPPlY' available along uses. 8. services currently are designed to accommodate industria of Utilities advises of the Department roximitY to this y• Sewer Service: Staff t adequate sewer facilities are located n tha site. that direct access will ensure will not be permitted Access: Proffered conditions Access 10• be gained from U•5. 460 only. from Carson Road (Rt• 758)' along conveniently located Rail Centers: Site is roximitY to I-81. Transportation is not within Close P 11. 460 but U.S. service is not available on-s te•hin the urban service area. 2• Urban Sector: Site is located wit 1 by O1a1N^ , 3 3 5 bordered by U.S. 460/11 and The site is abut the site along the Surrounding Lando b. Several residences Carson Roar ertY boundary. southern p p commercial, and some Area: Rural residential, c. Neighbindustry. light owner has not proffered any Although the property t lap has been Site Layouts to site layout, a concep p the concept d• As mentioned above, conditions relgtaff review. a mixed use development ld hbeoth commerc a e submitted for served by an plan illustrates The site U.S. 460.• Th land uses. access onto and industrial which would will be built to internal roadway ro osed roadway ublic right'of- property owner advises the p p dedicated as P ro erty owner proffer the submitted state stand reCOmmendslthe Pe p evelopment. way, Staff condition of d concept plan as a Architecture: no specific development N~ e' o Although ressed and Landscaping the property owner has exp 3 f, Screening roffered, roposal has been P trate industrial uses °norti n of the site P concep his desire to As previously mentioned th s p and buffering e lot residences. Screening ate any of the site. abuts several larg this portion of the sit~his mdevelopment wired alongthat may arise from will be regconflicts I_9 of the Principal land use As specified in Policy pattern. exceptional design measures and ti ate land use impacts when resid On iaspect Industrial t a m wage category d acent to each other. necessary and buffering. industrial uses are lnclse sufficient s carinlminimize impacts of exceptional desi9 and buffering resulting from industrial Adequate screening the property staff is recommending along associated wit a ifically~visibil ty ening and buffering e E land uses. SP Type E, pption 2 sere Typ roffer ro erty boundarieS•feet with owner p and of 50 a buffer Y both the: ideeres dents ith n reen trees and small shrubs. would pr everg assorted deciduous trees, concept plan. Amenities: Unknown due to lack of a 5 9• Natural Amenities: h. TRAFFIC 1986 revealed n er day along this Street Capacities: Tr~eiyc19o000svehiclese $ existing traffic 3 i. approxima Staff estimate a volume of segment of U.S. Route460/1 higher. volumes are significantly eneration rates for both commercial/lig went would generate Based on ITE trip g the prop°sed devel P This estimate is industrial land uses, er daY• 70 acres of 393 vehic VehiCies t ip ends for approximately 13' weekday ace. based on average 000 square feet of retail sP light industry, and 121, ~~~~~ The county's Six-Year Road Improvement Program does not include plans to upgrade Carson Road. j, Circulations Direct ac Carson RoadsiteAny uaccess rfromeCarson either U.S. 460/11 or is discouraged since it is a Road, primary or secondary. Staff recommends the petitioner substandard secondary roadway. ained proffer conditions ensuring that access will be only g from U. S. 460. Stoaf oneu point rato the d existingo median wcut restrict access t directly in front of rticiiate in thepconstructionrofaa traffic staff that he will pa p signal at this location arc lsCecreat d hwi hin othe commercial parcels and/or any outp area, should be provided via the internal roadway or by a frontage road along U.S. 460. Based on existing development standards, in the event of future subdivision of the site, additional curb cuts or driveways along U.S. 460 would be prohibited. 5 UTILITIES 3 k, Waters Staff of theSRo460 corridoryin easttcounty isUdesigned advises the entire U. to serve industrial land uses. 3 1. Sewer: Staff of the Department of Utilities advises that adequate sewer faciladvisesrthat cas partnof this idev lopment site. Staff further proposal a sanitaril t to this ext nsionl staffxrequestsathat Carson Road. To fac the land owner grant tht bore the sewerelineeacrossoUlSSt460 the sewer sub-main and at Carson Road. DRAINAGE 3 m, Basin: No known drainage problems. 3 n, Floodplains It adeeCreek istlocated within thetflood plain property along Gla boundary. PUBLIC SERVICES 3 0, Fire Protection: No problems noted. 3 p, Rescue: See "o" above. N/A q. Parks and Recreation r, Schools: TAR BASE N/A s. - Land and Improvement Value: - Taxable Gross Sales/Year: ~~ 4 4 - Total Employeess - Total Revenue to the County/Year: Unknown ENVIRONMENT t. Air: Site design shouCtionn and operations phases ofiany future during both the constru eats the property owner proffer use of this site. Staff sugg that dust mitigation mea The dustlmitigation ym asuresnshould phases described above. negate any impacts that dust may have on adjoining residences. u, Water: Since this an si nificant lpoint~sourceregrou dwater possibility exists for g pollution impacts on the surrounding residential areas. N/A v. Soils: 4 w. Noises Site design should include measures to mitigate any impacts associated with futuredusenofbthistsite~nsForcexamplea operation phases of any site design should takiblevato gmitigatei the effectrofhnoise vegetation, where Peas and light on adjacen~ conditions•ensuring sthatssou d levels property owner proffe do not exceed 60 dB(A) when measured at adjoining residences. g x, Signage: Staff recommends the property owner proffer conditions which ensure thae ~ lroadefrontagetorx 300 quare ufeet filer lot one foot of lin within the development. 6 PLAN CONSISTENCY t 7. This area is designated an amendmentnsoflotheanLandeVUsepmPlan Petitioner has segue designation to Principal ntd ~ th he petitionerPslrequestrialThose use category is consists policies pertaining to site design will have to be evaluated after a specific development proposal has been submitted. STAFF EVALUATION a, Strengths: (1) Proposed site includes adequate road frontage along U.S. 460 and is relatively isolated from adjoining residences. b, Weaknesses: (1) The proposed rezoning is unconditional and offers no restrictions on future use of the site. Any use permitted in the M-1, Light Industry District including veterinary hospitals locat d oonb thisrsit r and2jePetitioner facilities could be proposes to develop a mixed use complex containing approximately 121,000 square feet St ffewould prefer that the guise of light industrial zoning. petitioner pursue aeBcom lexethat will be devoted to retails those portions of th p ~~~~ c, Proffers Suggested: (1) Staff recommends the pconditionwnof proffer the submitted concept plan as a owner proffer development. ( 2 ) Stafffuture muse of thisr sitety Specifically, conditions restricting owner proffer conditions staff recommends the property Automobile prohibiting the following uses on this site= reconditioning, painting, upholstering, repairing, rebuilding, body and fender work, truck repairing or overhauling; (b) Manufacturing or assemblingoso italdand commercialhkennelsewith or straw; (c) Veterinary h p exterior runs and yards; (d) Flea markets; and owners proffer Feed stores. (3} Staff recommends the property conditions limitingould be pr hib t d.fr(4)UStaff6recommends from Carson Road sh and buffering the property owner proffer "Type E" screening boundaries. along the western and southern propertyowner proffer Specifically, staff recommends the property "option 2" which calls Staff as ggests t at the property owner assorted vegetation. (5) proffer conditions ensuring that sound levels do not 6 ceStaff dB(A) when measured at adjoining residences. ( ) suggests the property owner proffer that dust mitigation measures will be empleyeropertygowner profferdthatisignagevon (~} Staff suggests th p each industrial lot not a 300dsquaregfeet filer lot within tthe linear road frontage or development. ~~~ - ~ ~ ~~~~ ~~~t ~ ~~ ~~~~ DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT M$ M O R A N D O M TO: FROM: DATE BIIB.TSCT Terry Harrington, Director, Planning and Zoning Timothy W. Gubala,~~`Director, Economic Development September 25, 1989 Land Use onagoutenll/460f(formerly Lowe property)nc. property Bac&ctround ral in and•Waldron purchased the propertytfstaffrevaluated this as F Economic Developmen 1988. Roanoke County being a potential industCsnlrehensi a Plan andnrezone the property of Supervisors amend the P so that it could be used for future industrial development. Re ested Land Use Plan Amendment: It is requested that the Comprehensive Plan be amended from Development to Principe 1tlond roeote •mixed uses development f the frontage should remai P entire site. Effect of the Amendment on Surroundin Pro erties: Scattered The. site is adjences are Racross this road and along Carson Road to large lot resid the north and east. Several residences are to the south. The general area characte iced to protects the Indust calf usesg from screening will be requ adjacent residential areas. o ed to eensure o compat bilityfwith retail and flex-space is prop residence uses. Accessomf each individual property b A ma t r plan entrances rather than fr is recommended prior to development. Reasons for the Amendment: is deficient in "ready to go" industrial sites The Roanoke Valley to offer to prospective industrial clients from outside the Com>sonwealth. The Bo ri tof encourage rindu trial tsite development 90 is to take actin g water and sewer extensions through changes in land use, zonin ortunities for public-private and long range highway planning. OPP partnership exist to implement site development by the privat P.O. BOX 29800 • ROANOKE . VIRGINIA 24018-0798 • (703) 772-2069 FAX, NO.= (703) 772-2030 A Beauti~u/6cS+nning sector. Since this si manta firm sisite d Ve elopment cannbescontr lledrand estate develop managed in a positive manner. Justification for the Amendment: Existinct Land Use Pattern. Opportunity for controlled development of a large tract that could set the development pace and criteria for the remainder of the 11/460 East Corridor. Existinct Zoning - Currently residential in area. This property and several other sites in the area are proposed to be part of a new East County Industrial area adjacent to the Route 11/460 Corridor. Potential Ind989rstudsliniti tad by the Board ofeSupervisorstrial site by the Y Employment center - None existing but proposed as part of East County Industrial area. T_opoctraphy - Site is within the 10$ slope criteria land use determinant. Flood Hazard - Outside floodplain boundaries. Water suppler - Water off site in Carson Road. Sewer service - Sewer service main line in Glade Creek. A 15" sewer lateral is through property to Route 11/460. Access - Access points should be located from Route 11/460 to minimize the number of entrances. Transportation Center - Adjacent to Route 11/460. Urban sector - Property is within Urban Service Sector. VI BE A 9~ R A t r 1 RGINIA: ,FORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY ) ~ ~~ lOSt acre parcel of land, located south of ) ~nerally jute 460 East (Challenger ~ ) PROFFER venue), partially adjacent ) OF o Route 758 (Carson Road) COND_ I_ TIONS rithin the Vinton Magisterial ) )istrict, and recorded as parcel ) 1os. 50.01-1-5, 50.01-1-5.1 in ) the Roanoke County Tax Records. 1 TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY: Being in accord with Section 15.1-491.1 et seq. of the Code of Virginia enCounty Petitioner$~F&W Propertieskll C InctY hereby Ordinance, th rvisors of Roanoke voluntarily proffers to the Board of Supe Virginia, the following conditions to the rezoning of the' County, arcel of land: above referenced p 1, The property will not include permitted uses for: a. Manufacture of pottery and figurines or other similar ceramic products; b. Veterinary hospital and commercial kennels with exterior runs and yards; c, Outside flea markets, unless a special exception has been granted by the Board of Supervisors. 2. That all locational signage [Sec. 21-93(D)] will bi aesthetically pleasing and be no more than forty (40 square feet in sign face area and no msignsh(billboards feet in height. Outdoor advertising will be prohibited. 3, That all utilities will be underground. 4. That there will be no on-street parking. 5, That there will be sufficient truck loading spacE designed for each building site, as necessary. 6. That the Petitioner will evaluate the drainage situati~ for the subject tracts and implement a design f~ drainage facilities to either r Roanoke County) and t (2) year storm (as required by retention or detention for a ten (10) year storm. 7. That primary access to the property will be limited Route 460. g, Building placement and parking will be designed to z impede the future widening of one additional lane alc Routes 460 and 758. ~ 9~ -~ Route 460 9. Should out-parcels b accessdiwilld bea provided via an . frontage (Parcel A), median internal road network plan utilizing the existing cut on Route 460. g (pption 2) buffer and screening requirements will 10. TYPe tween Parcel "A" and single family be provided be resiirements will be implementted asr sped is development requ occurs. 11. Existing oak trees on Parcel "A" will be preserved to the extent allowing for feasible development of the subject parcel. 12. All in ted to VDOTrstandards for lfuture dedica ion. and construc 13. Dust mitigation controls will be implimented during site excavation activities. 14. The developer will cooperate with the Roanoke utility Utility Department to provide necessary easemeontRoad)oataasmutuallysagre ~uponnl~ationoute 758 (Cars Respectfully submitted, g & W Properties II, INC. By tney, Jr. ichard S• Executive Vice President ~~ , 2 ~ w Zoning: ~ Comprehensive Development transition Plan Designation: Access: Challenger Road (Route 460) Water: On site Sewer: On site Owner is willing to sell and/or jointly Availability: develop for mixed use. Ftecommenaa~on: Amend Comprehensive Plan to Principal Industrial; Rezone site to M1. Fiscal Impact: None Depar anent of Lowe Property ment 105 acres Economic Develop ULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPEAR MINISTRATION CENTER,NTY AT A REG VIRGINIA, HELD p' TUESDAY,~F B U~Y 27' 1990 ORDINANCE TO AMEFDp,TpROXIM~A'rE~LYL105 ACRES LO- MAp DESIGNATION O CATED BETWEEN ROUT RIAL DISTRICT ROM DEVELOP- THE HOLLINS MAGIS MENT TO PRINCIP CATIONS FROML RE DTO THENZONING ZONING CLASSIFI CLASSIFICATION THEW BOARDO OFI SUPERVISORS TOF APPLICATION OF ROANOKE COUNTY WHEREAS, by Resolution 91289-4 the Board of Supervisors of oanoke County, Virginia, initiated amendments to the Comprehensive R an and to the classifications of certain real estate located in P1 as Roanoke County to serve the public purposes of the County eneral welfare, and ublic necessity, convenience, g required by P ood zoning practice to implement the recommendations of the g Economic Development Action Plan for FY .1989-90; and eld on WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was h December 19, 1989, and the second reading and public hearing was held on February 27, 1990; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on January 3, 1990; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the Future Land Use Plan map designation of a certain 105 acres, as tract of real estate containing approximately described herein, owned by Fralin & Waldron Inc. and located between Route 11/460 and Carson Road in the Hollins Magisterial ~~~~ chan ed from Development to Principal Industrial; and District be g at the zoning classification of a certain tract of real 2, Th ontaining approximately 105 acres, as described herein, estate c 460 and caned by Fralin & Waldron Inc. and located between Route 11/ d o change is hereby Carson Road in the Hollins Magisterial District, state District, Residential E from the zoning classification of RE, the zoning classification of M1, Light Industrial District. to 3, That the Board initiated the application to change t e classification of this real estate located in Roanoke County zoning fired by public ur oses of the County as requ to serve the public p P and good zoning practice necessity, convenience, general welfare, lement the recommendations of the Economic Development Action to imp Plan for FY 1989-90• roffered in writing 4, That the applicant has voluntarily P following conditions which the Board of Supervisors hereby the accepts: a, The property will not include permitted uses for: ottery and figurines or other i, Manufacture of P roducts; similar ceramic p ii. Veterinary hospital and commercial kennels with exterior runs and yards; iii. Outside flea markets, unless a special excep- tion has been granted by the Board of Supervi- sors. e Sec. 21-93 (D) ] will be b, That all locational signand be no more than forty aesthetically pleasing s are feet in sign face and no more than Signs (40) ~ Outdoor advertising (g ) feet in ~ i 9 be' prohibited . (billboards) c, That all utilities will be underground. d, That there will be no on-street parking. ~~~--3 e, That there will be sufficient truck loading spaces designed for each building site, as necessary• f, That the Petitioner~wac~ tracts and imp ement ga situation for the J design for drainage facilities to each required by detain the two (2) year storm Roanoke County) and the retention or detention for a ten (10) year storm. rimary access to the property will be limited g • That p to Route 460. lacement and parking will be designed to h, Building p of one additional not impede the future widening lane along Routes 460 and 758. i• Should out-parcels be subdivided along Route 460 Parcel A), access will be provided via an frontage ( the existing internal road network plan utilizing median cut on Route 460. j, Type E (Option 2) buffer and screening requirements will be provided between Parcel „A11screening and family residences. All Roanoke County lemented as buffering requirements will be imp specific development occurs. oak trees on Parcel "A" will be preserved k, Existing for feasible development of to the extent allowing the subject parcel. 1• All internal tho T standards forlfuture dedications constructed to VDO m, Dust mitigation controls will be implemented during site excavation activities. n, The developer will cooperate with the Roanok utility Utility Department to provide necessary easement(s) for a sanitary sewer submain along Route 758 (Carson Road) at a mutually agreed upon loca- tion. 5. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: Par_ cel 1 oint on the southerly line of U. 5. Route BEGINNING at a P said point being the northwesterly 460 (Variable R/W), corner of property now or formerly James L. Swortzel thence with the southerly line of (D.B. 764, page 596); g 42° U. S. Route 460, the followin five distances: N• 48' 15" E. 583.03 feet; N. 54° 06' 05" E. 102.19 feet; N. ~ ~~ -3 29° 36' 10" E. 153.33 feet; N. 58° 23' 40" E. 260.62 feet; N. 36° 07' 10" E. 321.02 feet to a point, being on the westerly line of property of Valley Reformed Presbyterian Church (D.B. 1105, page 512); thence with the same, the 367.84 feet; following two distances: S. 42° 23' 30" E. Dint in the and N. 47° 36' 30" E. 605.02 feet to a p center of Virginia Route 758; thence with the same, the following eleven distances: S. 28° 11' 05" E. 40.86 feet to a point of curve; thence with a curved line to the left, whose radius is 385.08 feet, and whose chord bearing and distance is S. 33° 53' 25" E. 76.57 feet, an arc distance of 76.70 feet to another curve; thence with a curved line to the right, whose radius is 837.10 feet, and whose chord bearing and distance is S. 33° 30' 40" E. 177.48 feet, an arc distance of 177.81 feet to another curve; thence with a curved line to the right, whose radius is 6197.83 feet, and whose chord bearing and distance is S. 26° 37' 40" E. 172.77 feet, an arc distance of 172.78 feet to another curve; thence with a curved line to the right, whose radius is 369.04 feet, and whose chord bearing and distance is S. 15° 14' 05" E. 135.70 feet, an arc distance of 136.48 feet to a point; thence S. 04° 38' 25" E. 70.83 feet to a point; thence with a curved line to the left, whose radius is 236.27 feet, and whose chord bearing and distance is S. 14° 22' 00" E. 79.84 feet, an arc distance of 80.22 feet to a point; thence S. 24° 05' 40" E. 161.25 feet to a point; thence with a curved line to the left, whose radius is 409.56 feet, and whose chord bearing and distance is S. 39° 59' 55" E. 224.47 feet, an arc dis- tance of 227.38 feet to a point; thence S. 55° 54' 10" E. 133.15 feet to a point; thence with a curved line to the right, whose radius is 421.97 feet, and whose chord bearing and distance is S. 48° 22' 10" E. 110.65 feet, an arc distance of 110.97 feet to a point; thence leaving Virginia Route 758, and with the northerly line of property of Roanoke County (D.B. 1285, page 1524), S. 61° 06' S4" W. 201.30 feet to a point; thence S. 28° 53' 05" E. 100.00 feet to a point on the northerly line of Otis C. Chambers, et ux (D.B. 467, page 252); thence with same, S. 61° 06' 54" W. 336.77 feet to a point; thence S. 31° 49' 10" E. 740.29 feet to a point on the aforesaid Virginia Route 758; thence with the same, the following four distances: S. 23° 03' 10" W. 104.70 feet; S. 21 12' 50" W. 172.94 feet; with a curved line to the right, whose radius is 307.83 feet, and whose chord bearing and distance is S. 34° 19' 45" W. 139.70 feet, an arc dis- tance of 140.93 feet to a point; thence S. 47° 26' 40" W., crossing the centerline of a 20 foot waterline easement at 268.90 feet, in all 417.95 feet to a point; thence N. 51° 57' 30" W. 232.09 feet to a point; thence S. 86° 43' S0" W. 294.09 feet to a point; thence S. 81° 46' 55" W. 179.24 feet to a point; thence with the northerly line of property of I. J. Bower, et ux. (D.B. ~ ~~ 712, page 302), S. 67° 22' 50" W. 942.82 feet to a point on line of property now or formerly Joel Jo Ewen (D.B. 1449, page 737, Roanoke City); thence N. 21 35 00 W. 565.59 feet to a point on the southerly line of property of Jack Waldrond (D.B. 996, page 719); thence with the same, N. 71° 16' 00" E. 201.70 feet; thence N. 01 29 30" W. 1347.57 feet to a point; thence with the northerly line of aforesaid Swortzel, S. 79° 29' 35" W. 268.07 feet to the place of beginning, and known as Tract A, contain- ing 104.27 acres, as more fully shown on a survey of Dr. Richard Lowe Property for Fralin & Waldron Properties, prepared by Robert S. Lang, Land Surveyor, dated August 1988. TOGETHER with that certain 60-foot wide non-exclusive easement across property of Trustees of Valley Reformed Presbyterian Church of America, as reserved by Richard H. Lowe, Jr., in deed recorded in Deed Book 1253, page 74. Parcel 2 BEGINNING at a point on the southerly side of U. S. Route 460 (Variable R/W) at its intersection with the center- line of Virginia Route 758; thence continoing~with~the centerline of Virginia Route 758, S. 22 12 55 E. 241.32 feet to a point; thence leaving Virginia Route 758, S. 54° 20' 54" W. 163.89 feet to a point; thence N. 19° 03' 10" W. 244.90 feet to a point on the sou54 e210y side of U. S. Route 460; thence with the same, N. 30" E. 150.00 feet to the Place of Beginning, and known as Tract B, containing 0.846 acre, as more fully shown on the aforesaid Survey of Dr. Richard Lowe Property for Fralin & Waldron Properties, prepared by Robert S. Lang, Land Surveyor, dated August 1988. 6. That the effective date of this ordinance shall be February 27, 1990. 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111-I~tiit~t~~~~~~~"~•••••••~~ IIIlilllllllllllllllllllllllllllillll ~~, ~} ~ ~ ; u ~s~a~ " ST " UE _ CE REQ " N '' A APPS AR ENDA ITEM N~• --' - - ,~,; AG :' _ . - - SUBJECT e~isors to irman of the Board of up above matter I would like the Cha on the the ubhc hearingg PODIUM, • me during p ED T~ THE recognize yvHEN CALL comment. _ E AND ADDRESS FO INES so that I may VE MY NAM HE GUI'DEL I WILL GI GREE TO ABIDE BY T RECpRD. I A _ LIS'T'ED BELOW • • een three to five minutes to co~oann~l • esker will be given betty Each sp individual or representatiens~eak~g on an issue, whether speaking as an ber of citiz p o f the Board to decide the time limit based le ~~ acted by the majoi~ity and will enforce the rule un do otherwise. Dint of view only. Ques- resentation of their p • Speakers will be limited to a p the ~airman• f clarification may be entertained by een a recognized bons o Debate betty ents must be directed to the Bo owed. c • All comet __ esker and audience members is not at all times. sp exercise courtesy • th s eskers and the audience will _ Bo P written statements and/or comments nested to leave any • Speakers are req with the clerk. FQR AN ORGANIZED OR'I'ING TO SPEAK ORIZA'I'ION • INDI`TIDUALS PLTRP ,'THE CLERK ~1~TTENAL T~ REPRESENT "" GROUP SHALL FILE WI OUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDU '" THE GR _ CLERK BEM. DEPUTY _' T LEGIBLY AND GIVE PLEASE PRI _ -~, , ,; NAME , ,.~_ ;; _. _ RESS ,,= ADD .. ~; .:- ;, ;. _; <_ PHONE -_ IIIIIIillillllilllllllllllllllllllllllllllil IIIIIIIIIiiillllllllllllllllllilllilllllllll filllllllilllllllllllllllllll illllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllilli--~~~i~~~~~~~~~""""' 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 _ ]~IIIIIIIIIIIIII c _ CE REQ VEST _ _ AN APP~A~ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ~_ - M .~ 'mil C ~ ~" SUBj i of the Board of Super°rs ~ , ' hearin on the above matter = I would like the Chapman ' - ubhc = nize me during the p LLE TO THE PODIUM, - recog WHEN CA - so that I may comment. - E AND ADDRESS FOR - I WILL GIVE MY NAM ABIDE BY THE GUIDELI RECOI~D• I AGREE = BELOW • = LIS'T'ED •= iven between three to five minuZt'ehse ~a~an w~l c • Each speaker will be g on ~ Issue, '- r s Baking as an individual or r ber of citizens speakin8 • whethe p • o f the Board to = decide the time lunit base nless~mstructed by the majority and will enforce the rule u c do otherwise. y ues- • resentation of their point of view onl . w • Speakers will be limited to a p fication may be entertained by the Chairman = bons of clan • to the Board. Debate between a recognize • All comments must be directed and audience members is not allowed. s• = speaker e audience will exercise courtesy at all time • Both speakers and th - ve an written statements and/or comments • Speakers are requested to lea y with the clerk. FOR AN ORGANIZED __ • IVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK pItIZATION IND LE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTH NG THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT = GROUP SHALL FI '° FROM THE GROUP ALLOWI - THEM. CLER - GIBLY AND GIVE TO DE -_ PLEASE PRINT L - ~ ` ~' -' n„ ,=~ ~ NAME ~ ~~ ~ +~ _ _ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~t ADDRESS _ ,~~ - ~s~ = PHONE _ - IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIilllillilll - Illilllllilllllillllllllllllllllllllllillllllll fi~~-illllllllllllll Illllllllllllllllillllllilillllllilllllllllilllllllllllll{IIIIIIIIilllllllllll WIIlillllllllllllllllllllllilllllliillllllillllliil ,~'~ _ .~ CE RE VEST EARAN Q _ APP __ AGENDA ITEM NO. ~ ~ ~ =_ SUEJECT ~ ~ -`~ ~ ~~ ould like the Chairman of the Board of Supex~tisors to - Iw nine me during the public hearingg on the above matter recog LLED TO THE PODIUM, = WHEN CA c so that I may comment. ND ADDRESS FOR THE I WILL GIVE MY NAME _ ECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELI R LISTED BELOW. '" • ker will be iven between three to five minutes to comment Each spec $ c whether s Baking as an individual or representative. The ch~irmn ~ issue, = decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speak g and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. _ • S Bakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Ques- pns of cl ' 'cation may be entertained by the Chairman. __ do • 1 comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized c speaker and audience members is not allowed. __ • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. • rs are re nested to leave any written statements and/or comments _ Speake q __ with the clerk. _ • INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT = THEM. _ E PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO DEPUTY CLE PLEAS NAME r~~- w~ ~ y~~,1 ~ - _ ADDRESS .3 ~ 1 7 .Sf~-,~ d ~~. c~ ° ° 1 i~ o w _. ~ 6.3 2 PHONE `' _ _ IIIIIIIIIillll l l l llllllililililllllllllilllllllllllllllllllllillllilllillllillllllilillllll mllllllliillllllllillillllil iillilllilllllllllllllillllllllllillillllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllit~ WIIlillllllllllllllillllllllillllllllilllililllllllil ,# _ ..,,~ .~ CE RE UE ST _ SARAN Q _ APP -_ AGENDA I'T'EM NO. ,. i/'. _ _ SUBJECT ~ , r _ ~~ ould like the Chairman of the Board of Supex~tisors to c Iw . = nine me during the public hearingg on the above matter - recog LLED TO THE PODIUM WHEN CA so that I may comment. D ADDRESS FOR THE _ I WILL GIVE MY NAME A _ _ RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELI LISTED BELOW. • ker will be iven between three to five minutes to comment _ Each spea $ whether speaking as an individual or representative. Th ak ~n ~ issue, = decide the time limit based on the number of citizens spe c and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to =_ do otherwise. • S Bakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Ques- __ tppons of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. irected to the Board. Debate between a recognized _ • All comments must be d "" speaker and audience members is not allowed. _ • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. • rs are re uested to leave any written statements and/or comments Speake q with the clerk. °_ • INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE NTH T~ CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. _ - ASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO DEPUTY CLE PLE -_ _ _ '- NAME ~ "`' = ADDRESS 3 7 9 ~J ~' ~ ^/~' ~ ~' w _ _ - '- PHONE ? Jd 1 _ Iillllllllllllillillllllllliliiiillllllllllllllllillliillillllllllllllllllllllllllllllliillill mlllillilllllllllllillllll Ililliilllillllllllllllilllllililllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll~~~~i~~~~~~~~u ~Iiliilllilllllilillllllllllllll .~ ~,~, CE REQUEST = APPEARAN __ -~ = AGENDA ITEM NO. ~~ ~;~ {.. - ~~ --~ --, ~ , ~r ~. ~ ~~ - <<., ,. ._-~ c ~--,.z ~~. __ suB JECT ~ , . 1 f . ~ ~ , 1_ _ { ld like the Chairman of the Board of Supex~tisors to I wou nine me during the public hearin on the above ma er - recog LE~j TO THE PODIUM, = WHEN CAL so that I may comment. ADDRESS FOR THE - IVE MY NAME AND = I WILL G - IND. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINE - IZECO - LISTED BELOW. • ker will be iven between three to five minutes to comment Each spec g - Nether s Baking as an individual or representative. The chairman wil ecide the time limit based on the number of citizens speak f ~e Board toes d and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the maionty o do otherwise. eskers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Ques- "" • bons of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman• • mments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized - All co . speaker and audience members is not allowed. - th s eskers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. • Bo p • S eskers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments __ ~nnth the clerk. =_ • INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FQR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK ~TI'EN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT = THEM. - PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO DEPUTY CLE = PLEASE __ ,- ;- ~, -~ - ~ ~ - ~ r`~ j ~ 1y~ = NAME ~ if-=-~ ~ Y~ ~~ - ~~ ,~k_ - _~ Cam/ ~ `/ ~-~ '/ `r~'- ~-+ ~~ /~(,~ C C: ~._~ = ADDRESS ~ r r ~ ~ . %` ~~ _ ,.,-~ = PHONE IIII I Iil 11 lllllllllllllllllllillllllllllllllllllllllillilllllllliliilllillililllllllll 1111IIIIililllllllllllllllllilillll iilillllllilllllllilillllllllllllllllllllllllllillllillllllllllllllllllllillllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll ~ 111111111111 ~ ..,, - ,~ ~.~;~ - s - PE ARAN CE REQUEST - AP _. __ _ ~; AGENDA ITEM NO. `,.' ~ ~` ._ ~~ ~ ~ ~ .; ~~ = suBJECT _ f = I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supex~tisors to = recognize me during the public hearin on the above matter - so that I ma comment.WHEN CALLS TO THE PODI , - I WILL GI E MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR T - RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINE - LISTED BELOW. • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, c and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to = do otherwise. _ • Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Ques- = bons of cl ' 'cation may be entertained by the Chairman. • All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized = speaker and audience members is not allowed. =_ • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all tunes. • S eskers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments ~nnth the clerk. • INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FQR AN ORGA111IZED - GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRI'TT'EN AUTHORIZATION - FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. - PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO DEPUTY CLER _ • NAME '%, i r~ ~~ , ; ,C~ ~~ ~. t,/ - _ ~; - - ADDRESS /~' `~.5 .~~r,2 ~~~ ~, r.~,,,~i" ~ :i - ~- PHONE ~'~~ _ 7 c ,3 j - _ mllllllllllllllllilllllllllllillllillilllillllillllllilllllllllllllillilillllllllll~~lillllliillllllllillllillllilillllll IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIiIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIiIIIII1111111111111111111111111111111111iitt~~ii~~~~~~~~~u ~111111111111111111111111111111111 ,~...,,,~~ ~~,,~ _ • _ • __ CE RE UE ST _ AN Q APPEAR _ AGENDA ITEM NO. 2~D- `_~ __ SUB ~ ~ z o r~ ~ . jECT like the Chairman of the Board of Supex~tisors to I would me durin the public hearin on the above matter _ recognize g _ comment.WHEN CALLS TO THE POD - yy = so that I ma _ IVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR T = I WILL G _ I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINE RECORD. _ LISTED BELOW. n between three to five minutes to comment • Each speaker will be give 'The chairman will whether speaking as an individual or r ber of citizens speaking on an issue, decide the time limit based on the num 1 enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to c and wil do otherwise. • kers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Ques- Spea __ bons of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman• '~'~ Debate between a recognized • All comments must be directed to the Board. speaker and audience members is not allowed. • h s Bakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. Bot p -_ • Bakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments S wp1th the clerk. IVIDUALS PURPOR'T'ING TO SPEAK FQR AN ORGANIZED _ • I~ UP SHALL FILE WI'T'H THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION GRO OM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESEN THEM. TNT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO DEPUTY CLE PLEASE PR wo NAME "' ADDRESS -'~ a r ~'-1 - PHONE ~ ~ -_ ill I IIIIIIIiilllilliilllllllillliililllillllllliiliililllililllllllllllllllllill millllllllllllilllillliillllllllilllllll i a, c_~ O~ AOANp,Y~ ti, ~ z ~ z v a 150 ^x /x~ 1 $ YEANS yV SFSQUIGEIJTENN~P~ A Beautiful Beginning ~ ~~~~~~ ~~ C~~~~~ ~ DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT M E M O R A N D U M TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: ~ ~~- ~' Mary Allen, Clerk to the Board ~..__ Tim Gubala, Director of Economic Development ISM February 14, 1990 53.44 acre tract located near West Ruritan Road I request a continuance of a rezoning scheduled for the February 27, 1990 Board of Supervisors meeting. This 53.44± tract owned by Fralin & Waldron is one of the parcels identified in the Economic from RE to M-1. I ask that Development Action Plan for rezoning 1990 this rezoning be continued for 30 days until the March 27, Board meeting to allow Fralin & Waldron to revCommissionnmeetingts and staff suggestions raised at the Planning Thank you. sbo c Terry Harrington Elmer Hodge P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE . VIRGINIA 24018-0798 (703) 772-2069 FAX. NO.: (703) 772-2030 l EETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPER MINISTRATIONCENTER,NTY AT A REGULAR M VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY AD 990 TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 27- DENIAL OF ORDINAN PLAN 27~P DESIGNATION TOF FUTURE LAND USE APPROXIMP'TELY ~ 2 4 • NTAIN RROAD EAND EAST OF ATHE SOUTH OF BUCK MOU THE CAVE SPRING BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY IN MAGISTERIAL DISTRIAIT ~.IFDOTO CHN GE THE ZONING PRINCIPAL INDUSTRI CLASSIFICATION FR CONDITIONS UPON THE APPLICA- IFICATION M3 WITH INC. TION OF VIRGINIA ASPHALT PAVING CO., WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on uar 23, 1990, and the second reading and public hearing was Jan Y held on February 27, 1990; and, REAS the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public WHE hearing on this matter on January 3, 1990; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: the Denied on motion of Supervisor Robers, and carried by following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Robers NAYS: Supervisors Johnson, Nickens A COPY TESTE: .~ Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc; File Director, Development & Inspections Arnold Covey, Director, Planning Terry Harrington, John Willey, Director, Real Estate Assessment Paul Mahoney, County Attorney ~`~'° -~` VIRGINIA ASPHALT PAVING CO., INC. PETITIONER:• ,16_12/89 (, 1990 CASE NUMBER• December 5- 1989 and February Date: 1990 Planning Commission Hearing Date• February 27- Board of Supervisors Hearing awing Co • - Inc • to amend the Fe to Princ pal A• RE4IIEST inia Asphalt P Petition of Virg from M-2 to M-3 to ation of a 24.09 acre tnecsaid Pr perty it agth of Buck Mt. Plan map design rezo located sou and to conditionally lan, generally Magisterial District. Industrial halt batch mix P Cave Spring construct an asp a parkway, Road and east of the Blue Ridg recognized representing nearby residents, an attorney the request. He noted his g• CITIZEN PARTICIPATION o osition tO ark Service who confirmed Don Wolthius, 50 present in PP approximately ative impacts on the viewshed. ersation with Art All It °, n serious n g 1 P d report do not mentioa cony est could resu the proposal an that the requ ressed follow: ality in the Clearbrook are Some concerns he exp lant; the ambient air to Andy Hetz of the sadditio al the capacity of the p could be an a roaching the limit according lant if noise standards is already PP the proposed P noise; department and the air quality; otential health risks ue pollution ro ect contributing factor in eroding enforce them; P of proposed p j lied, how will the Cou tYY plant; compatibility are app enerated by to air and odors g community. values to the immediate surrounding reciation in his property ressed concern with a dep 'lton exp otential damage to the roads from the Dewey Mlro osal is approved, and p , if the p P , truck traffic• laced this rehensive Development Plan has p C• gIGNIFICANT IMPACT FA1985SComP Heavy industrial uses are 1, Comprehensive Plan: e land use categorY• a areas. area within a Rural Vil atibility in Rural Villag and related park hway; Blue Ridge Parkway prohibited with nO Secondary hig Surrounding Land: dense hardwood forestand related park 2' en space; rural residents hway~ Blue Ridge Parkway and oP Area: Secondary hig 3• Neighboring dense hardwood fores •the Blue RidgE redicted impact on roundwate~ and open space; rural residentia ~ ecified as g In addition to p 4, Natural Features: by the County's Resource Protectio: a viewshed, petitioner'Slo to includes land sp drainage, erosio Parkw Y critical P h rading, recharge zone and rotection, to conserveetitioner's site Guide. Maximum effort e et ~ on P ade throug g north of P severe negativ and sediment control, vis located immediately lant tower, The Blue Ridge Parkway es immediately north and south of u~ De ending upon exact location of batch mix P cility, should it reach E P occur to the two slop ro osed fa distan~ impact may s of the p P, s for a Mountain Road. Portion( ) inia Aspha. i ht, is projected to be osite the entrance to Virg feet in he g + from the parkway oPP ear. encounter of 1,000 feet roblems ati Paving Co., for at least six Should m nimize dust P gust mitig Site design measures ro erties. 5 . Air: struction and operation oT tect adjacent p 1 P • during c e should be employed to P roblems encounter techniqu ollution impacts unknown. Potential p including roac 6• Water: n measures should minimize noise P rotect adjaa ~ • Noise: Site desig eration of all site to ed tto /p during construction and op es should be emp Y Noise mitigation techniqu erties. Staff suggests a maximum of 60 dba. prop ~ ~~~~ the lowest Point asphalt plant at of the CONDITIONS the proposed at a point southwes B to its D. pgpFFERED will locate engineers its attached as Exhibit 1, petitioner determined by on which feasible as on the concept plan lant's designation .tion, petitioner will excavate the site u to blend p In adds a depth determined tO antfsosasle by its application ro osed pl the plant is pet btionertwillealso paint the p p lement engineers. and buffering to supp and into the environment. Type E screening site plan review Petitioner will install cover as determined by halt 2' forested ground ro osed asp existing approval. ill install noise reduction devices in the p alarm systems 3, petitioner w of the back-up by the plant. will reduce the dba level levels as determined trucks to acceptable regulations. 4, petitioner on its and OSHA material to or installed and Zoning delivering ates of Department of Planni ~ at drivers of trucks the tailg Petitioner proffers ro osed plant will not bang 5' material from the p p lant. hauling the proposed p such trucks after dark. dust control devices iT1 regarding the er will install , th all applicable env rdosmental laws and 6, petition ollution control standa petitioner will also co aP ~Y P i a ro riate darid regulations, including lant. Petitioner willartment ofp Planning ro osed p the Dep access roads. operation of the p p determined bYlant, including minimization measures as Zoning during the construction of the p VOTE AND REASON that it is not good e its designation without E. CO~ISSIOmoRed toTdenY the land use a and Chang aying He said that since Mr. Witt to take a piece of property area. planning ro erties and surrounding The motion in adjacent p p be reviewed by staff and Commission over t e address g the issue. the Comprehensive Plan is to that would be the time to look at next year, roll call vote: Massey, Winstead, Gordon carried with the following AYES; Witt, Robinson, NAYS: None ABSENT: None roffered conditions saying etition with p ative impacts. rove the p to mitigate neg there is Mr. Witt moved to app roffered conditionu a and in his opinion, that petitioner has p roposed. The motion carries Also the property is now zoned for M-2 not that much differollecallwvoteis being P with the following r Gordon AYES: Witt, Massey, NAYS: Robinson, Winstead ABSENT: None that this is not the kind of precedent Y g, DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE rese~ reed saying lementing the Comprehensive Play Mr. Winstead disag rocess of imp is willing to set in the p land use to continue its p nonconform h the expanded use is inconsiste~ i,e,, to allow an exist rid even thong rehensive Plan. form as well as tO exp ed in the Comp with the land uses encourag V Vicinity Map -/~ Concept Plan T- Other G. ATTACHMENTS: ~ Staff Report /~ ~ .% - /~ ringto Secretary Terrance Hunty Pla ning Commission Roanoke C '~~ ..., Roanoke County Planning Gamnission ,~: Tim Beard- p~ssoclate Planner halt Paving Ga~nY FRS February 2- 1990 nt/Virginia ASP DATE: and Land Use Plan Ma-P ~'~ for an ~~~: Rezoning r 5, 1989 and ext halms Paving ranted Dec ove, Virginia Asp the petition referenced ~nsideration: Pursuant to a o regardi 9 ontinuance ~nditions for Y~ additional month the following amended a list point feasible as Co~anY naw offers asphalt plant at th ~ nation on the to the Proposed lant s desig titioner will ineers at a Point southwest of the In addition, Pe (1) petitibneits e g 1~ lication. a depth determined to determined Y hibit B to its ~ constructed tO ro sed plant so as to concept plan attached as ~ lant is to int the P p° ~cavate the site upon which the P will also pa its engineers. Petitioner to supplant existing be feasible by e E screening and buffering blend into the environment. a royal. halt plant. site plan review and Pero Sed asp (2) petitioner wv ~ as aet ~~~ by the P p° installed on its forested 9roand CO 11 noise reduction devic ck ~ alarm sYst~ns Zoning and (3) Petitioner will insta level of the ~ rent of planning and will reduce a ede~termined by the Dew ter- (4) Petitioner able levels trucks to accept delivering material to or hauling ma ~~ regulations. t drivers of trucks it teS of such trucks after dark. coffers tha the to ~ ro osed plant. Petitioner (5) Petitioner P Sed Plant will not bang the P P lotions, including air ial frott- the prop° laws and r~ Petitioner will install dust control devices in ro Sed Plant. petitioner (6) 1 with all applicable ethe opera on of the P P° b the DePart~nt °f will also comp Y ds- regarding Sures as determined access roads. pollution control standar ction of the plant- including will employ apPrOpriate dust minimization mea Zoning during the constru Planning and ively: assessment of each Proffer follows, respect .brief even accounting for site excavation, the more precise elevationiant and its potential effects on the Blue (1) W i thout a Sed asphalt p final ultimate height °f the proP° own. iranents and reflects orig e Parkway viewshed rErnaln un~ meets ordinance rem Ridg and buffering are not (2) Type E screening ount of noise aednt~property staff suggestion. measusured at adj nature of noise reducai~al~ ofs60 dba a n-hand (3) The ested specified. Staff has sugg aired by Virginia law unless o to petitioner's attorney. lines- alarm systems for trucks are req according state (4) Back-up and County staff is not authorized to enforce observer(s) direct revs will ehoccurlar motion- of this proffer. t to further Since night operation ests deletion admirable atten-P al regulations, staff sugg ate noise is an extren1elY or Feder such a proffer would be assurance against truck tailg on the good intentions of all (5) Any landowners. However enforcing protect nearby rties ~ncerned wouldlai~ after rdark• pll pa difficult. at Virginia Aspt cified. The enforcement of Dash s fivers operating federal agencies. truck dr roads (6) the nature of dust control devices is no el would include watering e ulations rests withrs~ a and pollution contht ~ e~orceable by CrnuitY Pe minimization song as needed. joining Prop~tY and other disturbed areas held with reviously advises that meetings have been The petitioner p attorney at the entrance to its Petitioner's articular environmental concernsisting sign larger than that eX tions, has made a sincere owners to discuss P inconsistency of thi: ~buntain Road. and ~°ugh the revisexi condiing rofferei -proffered not to erect any However the rema altered by P off ices on Buck attempt to addreesCosmpff concerns. th rehensive Plan designation cannot proposal with conditions. ~ f~- ~ STAFF REPORT TITIONERs VA ASPHALT PAVING CO. INC. 46-12/89 PE 1989 CASE NUMBERS TIM BEARD DATES DECEMBER 5• Co., Inc. to amend the Future REVIEWED BYs Asphalt Paving tract from Rural inia of a 24.09 acre rezone said petition of Virg designation lant, Land Use Plan map to conditional Y e to Principal Industrial and an asoadland east ofxthe Blue Villaq M_3 to construct property from M_2 tsouth of Buck Mountain R generally located ring Magisterial District. Ridge Parkway, Cave Sp asphalt to construct and operate an 1. NATURE OF REQUEST request conduct related activities including a. Conditional facility and and offices. land manufacturingment storage. warehousing paving. equip an amendment to the fu has been wires which Principal Industrial) b, petitioner's Proposal req with the rezoning use map (Rural Village treviewed simultagoard of Supervisors. submitted and will be osal by the Planning Commission and prop a limited number of ermits ment in 2. AppLICABLE REGULATIONS has proffered develop in the Special Industrial District. P lan (Exhibit B) a. M_3, Petitioner heavy industrial uses. with concept P substantial conformity liance with manufacture of bituminous concrete. to ensure comp will be required Site plan preview b• ulations. serves the existing County re9 and driveway ermit will existing entrance ro erty changes. No new eoofetheaP eP ranee c. A n the site. development on VDOT unless usag be required from sloped along is moderately to severely 3. SITE CHARP-CTERISTIC S i t e ed i s a. To pog raphY~ Buck Mountain. to be develop northeast face of acre area height; The one to thne10„ diameter at breast b, Ground Cover: ul WOOd Size (6 ine). Adjacent to and pa king forested with P P inia and pitch P building. 301a~ 8 toatheVproPosal lie offices, shop re lot. the Clearbrook Situated within rowth. The 4• AREA CHARACT GroTv~th priority designated for limited g a, Future planning Area, service boundary. Community site is located outside 11 a developed with rural residential uses is partia Y eneral area. b• General area Hardwood forest uses dominate t e g the propose factor according to the impact of 5 . LAND USE RateC each ESSMENT row h 5 . eable impact Rating. scale of 1 th g ble impact, 3 = manag licable. action. Use a = neglig and N/A = not aPP 1 positive impact, 2 5 = severe impact, 4 disruptive impact, RATING 4 a. the above land use determ ro riate for this Based on as topography, resource that a plan map amendment would .not be aPP considering such factors especially ban sector location. Of the the land use plan protection, and ur rescribed by transporta- are not present on-site as P sewer service, cited. seven (potential industrial site listing- Rid a Parkway any em loyment centers)in addition to the se agrea y tion and P Secondary highway; Blu Land: ace; rural residential; dense hardwoo~ 4 b. Surround ark and open sp related P e parkway an forest. highway; Blue Ridg Area: Secondary dense hardwoo 4 c. Neighboring en space; rural residential; - related park and oP forest. and parking facilitie office, warehouse, asphalt plant out: Existing sing 3 d. Site LaY roposed hot mix si °~ to be supplemented by P or all served by erty and cold fsharplY phill from prop dryer, lime silo, leading existing entrance northwest corner. ~~ ' COMMENTS FACTOR ment Plan has 1985 Comprehensive Develop LAND USE COMPA'r lanTY a Rural Village land use categor in Comprehensive within atibility this area are prohibited with nO an amendment to placed Heavy industrial uses e areas. Petitioner is request n9 is Rural Villag a map to Principal Industrial to ana~m oo~date the future land us al Industrial deslg bout the ro osed uses. The Princip the P P delineate confined arheredi dustrialtsites may be intended to urbanizing sectors of the county w of the land use .determinants for Principa clustered. Staff evaluation summarized below. reviously located Industrial areas is attern. Industry has p no concentration of industrial/manufacturing (1) Existing land use p on-site, although Industrial zoning has been establishe facilities exl zoningbY• (2) Existing Subject site has not been on-site. (3) a Roanoke County industrial sites inventor Potentialthndustrial sttes• nt otential. a er identified by regarding future industrial developme centers. Immediate area does not o (4) Employment ently sloping. abundance of labor-intensive industry. located outside 0 o raphY• Petitioner's sl Subjectt s lte ~s g (5) T P g hazard prevention. (6) Flood a Parkway the floodplain. Valuable resources (Blue eidzone) are (7) Resource potection. roundwater recharg viewshed; critical slope gro osal. the p P a n d potentially threaten C pacity is sufficient for existing (g) Water supply' ublic proposed uses on-site. ect property is not served by P (9) Sewer service. Subj ro osed. existing street (VA 679). sewer and no serocationxisnaccessible by h located within one mi~eo (10) Access. L Althoug roximity (11) Transportation centers. etitioner's site is not within close of US 220, P stems. rail or airport sY Subject site is not located within t e (12) Urban sector. projected urban service area. it is staff's opinion inants, site ~ •. e. 3 f- 3 g• 5 h. 3 'on control structure (hot bins, mixer) to Architecture Gradate Existing buffer yard be of concrete and/or .steel conrsto~d i Hance. e n t r e e s t o . Pe Screening and LandscaP wire additional erowthre width (50'+) will req hardwood g lement existing predominantly Minimum parking supp adequacy questionable. ace per Parking ace per employee and one sP spaces Amenities: s ecify one sp ui ment (50 requiremenVehpcle or piece of mobile eq P c o m p a n y available) . act on the 81ue currently redicted imP site In addition to P etitioner's Natural Features: a zone and criti- id a Parkway viewshed (as endrou dwat rlrecharn Guide. Maximum R g land specified as g includes the County's Resource Protegrainage, erosion and cal slope by h rading~ to conserve these effort sh~ontrol,mvegetat~on Pgotection, sediment resources. immediately north of e parkway is located location of batch mix The Blue Ridg ending upon exact act may occur to site. Dep severe negative imP 440') on petitioner's Exhibit E) . plant tower ( roximately the same elevation (1~ arkway viewshed at aPPel north and south of Bue~ M euachi 6 ~ oadn P es immedeat Y should the two slopof the proposed facility, s for a distinia portion(is projected to be visible above treetop height. arkwaY opposite the entran earto Virg of 1, 000' + from the p It Paving Co•. for at least six months eac Y Aspha US 220 - 18,070. _ 2,160. TRAFFIC 1986 ADT: arkway overpass orts Street Capacities: 678 to P ment. VDOT rep seg i • ment of 679 from p.68 mile seg ro ected traffic In 1987. one accicCOmmodatescurrent a roxemately 280-300 trip that VA 679 can a estimated at aPP to ee etitioner, between dump truck and emp Y generated by P wally 120 vehicles. ) ends per day, divided eq vehicles. (Anticipated additional ADT: awed single will continue to use P afford ac at terminus which shoul lation: Petitioner 3 7• 2 k. 2 3 2 1. Cercu cue de s a plenaccesstto emergency vehicles. UTILITIESAdequate supply and distribution t r• through Clearbrook/ W a e stem . Any Hunting Hills sY tic system. Sewer: Site served by on-site sep and/or Pump station would be installed extension future sewer at owner': expense. any stormwater management (on-set DRAINAGE Basin: Back Creek Subbasin; m- ma be required will be determined at the se detention) whech Y federal] plan review stage. Proposed site is not located withen a n• F loodplain: ated flood hazard area. 2 0. 2 P- N/p- 9 N/A =• desegn PUBLIC SERVICES Within established service standard. Fire Protection: cue: Within established service standard. Res Parks and Recreation: School: a ~~_,~ TAX BASE rovement Value: $193.500 currently 1 s. - Land and Imp Taxable Gross Sales65e75• improved real - Total Employees: Year; Currently - Total revenu~oX ~ t iyC$2n225 estate only, aPP r ob 1 ems ENVIRONMENT n measures should minimize dust P site 4 t, Air: Site desi9 construction and operation of alo ed to - encountered during 'lities. Dust mitigation$ee proffers. should be emp face acent properties. protect adj acts unknown. Potential pollution imp round fuel 4 u. Water: petitioner has indicated that no un erg 2 v. Soils: storage will occur on site. roblems Site design measures should mine~ationoof all site 4 w. Noise: construction and oP encountered during Noise mitigation techniques should including roads. ro erties. Staff suggests a facil io ed'to protect adjacent p P be emP Y roffers. See p maximum of 60 dba. roffers. See suggested p 2 X. Signage: 6. PLAN CONSISTENCY Hated as Rural Village. Industrial uses suc are This area is dea19 n the M_3, Special Industrial DisteC fically those permitt lan map and policies; sP and extraction activities not inconsistent with the land use P amend 0 RV-5 which permits mining a to principal uses. The petitioner has submitted a reques manufacturing designation from Rural Villag uest and ort peititioner's req the land use map Industrial. Staff does not sudesignation remain Rural Vil age recommends the future land use map osal offers at this location. act on tax base. (2) Production and a, Strengths: (1) Positive imp ortunity to consolidandustr'al site. petitioner the oPP a to Blue distribution activities at an existing otential damai impact (1) proposal poses serious P negative Y b. Weaknesses: viewshed. (2) proposal may osal is Ridge Parkway roundwater recharge areas. (3) Prop e and g e land use policies and critical slop inconsisten 4) Pr posalrlackslproffered conditions. guidelines. t u ested: ~(1) No new on-site structureCOntoureXC( et c. Proffers s gg hest existing 40 feet in height relative to hig ft. per 1 ft.[of stre e shall be limited to 1.5 sq•er business.'v(3) TYPe E gignag to a maximum of 300 sq.ft• P er ordinance. (4) frontage uP shall be installed P t adjacent screening and buffering to ed Noise levels shall nous~ xceed 60 dba measure to f minimization measures will ac 1 P ies, property lines. (5) D eration of all on si during the construction and oP including access road(s). to roffers by the applicant will helPThe The offering of these p ects of this use. of this mitigate the visual and environmental asp is inconsistent wits fers will not however ov ed landausein deficiency prof that the propos request, namely nation for the area. the comprehensive plan desig Attorneys at Lsw RAKES &LM~E February 1, 1990 10 Franklin Road. S.E. Post Office Box 1018 Roanoke.~rginia 24005 703.982.8000 Telecopier 703.982.8524 r Department of Planning and Zoning Roanoke County Administration Center Room 600 3738 BBoXb29800 Avenue, SW P. O. Virginia 24018 0798 Roanoke, by Virginia Asphalt Paving 24.090 Acre Tract off of Buck RE• Application for oRezaning from M-2 CompanY~ Inc'' Virginia, Mountain Road in Roanoke County, ecial Industrial General Industrial District to M-3 Sp District Dear Sirs: halt"), has CompanY- Inc. ("Virginia Asp inia Asphalt Paving and Petition the Virg submitted its Petition for Rezoning arding previously Land Use Plan re nest is to Amendment to the Roaerty. CO The purpose of the req asphalt halt to construct and operate an General above-referenced p P zoned M-2 enable Virginia ASP which is currently plant on its property, Industrial District. 1989, a hearing was held before ate whichrtbme On December 5, planning Commission, ort on Members of the Roanoke Count and Zoning submitted its rep the Department of Planning Commission also heard from sevuest the petition. The Planning oke in opposition to the req adjoining property owners who sP Virginia Asphalt submitted for rezoning . Prior to the hea }ing c •~crdi..ion~ in response to tr.~ staff its voluntary proffer of uestions and comments as a result of sev C mm ssion and adjoining report. Howeverof the Planning etition be from members halt requested that ltto allow it to landowners, Virginia ASP 6, 1990, continued on the agenda until Fitsuproffers. properly respond, and to modify ressed by the Department of Planning and The primary concerns exp Zoning and adjoining landowners are as follows: Parkway viewshed. 1, Potential damage to the Blue Ridge 2, Noise. a 9~-a.. GENTR&LE RAKES Department of Planning and Zoning February 1, 1990 Page '2- g, Dust. olicies atibility with Rural Village land use p 4, Income and guidelines. halt responds to each item listed above as follows: Virginia Asp _ _ ____,___,~, ~,;Pwshed potential Dama a zo ~"~ "`~- - e parkway viewshed is ort recites that the the petition. However, The staff rep threatened by potentially inia Asphalt have discussed this mat er District Ranger of the Blue Ridge representatives of Virg the Parkway has with Mr. Richard MOrAccording to Mr. Morefield, negative Parkway Foundation. etition and does not see any no objections to the p impact on the Parkway. Virginia Asphalt the Parkway's position, halt plant at Notwithstanding its engineers at a voluntarily proffers that it will locate the as t lan the lowest point feasible as determined by lant's designation on the concep P, point southwest of the leaving an adequate buffer of existing previously submitted, Dining property. lant and the adj inia Asphalt -proffer that trees between the p ht relative to The staff report recommends that Virg onent of an new on-site structures TxCeThe4standard silolg omp However, no contou the highest existing roximately 60-70 feet in heigh Dint as asphalt plant is aPP lant at the lowest feasible ative to the location of the p ht considerably roffers discussed above will redin addit on, Virginia Asphalt p the existing contour. on which the plant is to be th determined feasible by its engineers to that it will excavate the site uP roffers that constructed to a dep ht. Virginia Asphalt also p and buffering as determined ant further reduce its eeE screening and will paint the p it will instal ro al of the site plan, review and aPP to reduce its visibility. ecial Industrial halt is aware that the M-3 Sp district may be Virginia Asp s in an M-3 s may be erected District provides that building Building to a height of 45 feet. erected uP ht with the approval of the Administraflag 45 feet in heig "chimneys. flues, cooling towers, over nif scant that or their accessory It is s radio or communication tower workmen" are excluded. poles, not normally occupied by storage silo is facilities halt respectfully submits that a Virginia Asp GENTRY LOCKS RAKES & NIOORE ~ ~ .. ~. Department of Planning and Zoning February 1, 1990 Page '3- ' 11 different than those items exclu requests the not materia Y or in the alternative, height restrictions, or to approve erection of the silo in excess of 4 Administrat feet. Nye ff report recommends that rt selines is Virginiat Asphalt The sta scent prope y lant in 60 dba measured at adz erable during the been unable to calculateusee dt c sel inopel at its P punt . has Virginia beca lant in Roanoke C Y Rocky Mount, ro osed p uarry, and winter months, as would be the p P The Rocky Mount plant is not located within a q o erates under conditions similar tOat its planttin therefore P However, the decibel reading is proposed facility. uarry at which other activitable Dublin, which is located in a q halt proffers tant, was found to be at dit eon 1 Virginia Aspbe accep halt cons In ad to the Commissioners. it will install noise reduction devices in the as that plant. lained that they were bothered Several adjoining landowners comp back up alarms on trucks and ht by the noise ctru ks bbanging their tailgates after at nig some the drivers of unloading material. ational Safety and Health Administration inia Occup motor vehicle equipment The Virg ~~ to er shall use any (i) the vehicle provide that No emp Y or having an obstrucn ed larm aboveetheasurrounding noise level; has a reverse sig only when an observer signals that Accordingly, Virginia Aspha'_t cannot (ii) the vehicle is backed uP alarms on trucks since its it is safe to do so"• material at night. proffer that it will not use a d kunloading business requires loading and OSHA Vir inia Asphalt proffers tableito the County the d a However, g level of the alarms to a level accep regulations. Virginia Asphalt of truck tailgates, With regard to banging material to or proffers that drivios oy trucks delivering ert will not bang the tailgates after hauling from the p P dark. GENTRY LOCKE ~ ~~ '~ RAKES & NK3D4ZE Department of Planning and Zoning February 1, 1990 Page -4- Dust ort suggests that dust mino eration f all on site The staff reP the construction and P inia Asphalt proffers be employed during access roads. Virg lant and will including the p facilities, ulations that it will installlacableo envi onmental la addition egVirginia comply.with all aPP lant. In regarding the operation of th w P 1 employ appropriate dust that it lant, Asphalt proffers during the construction of the p minimization measures including access roads. Incom atibilit with Existin Land Use re ort concludes that the offering of the above ects of The staff P ate the visual and environmacco d ng to the proffers will mitig However, they will not, the proposed use. osition that the proposed land use staff report, overcome its P rehensive plan designation for the is inconsistent RuraltV llage'". area, which is ~~ to the and argued Previously a lication, rising the property were As stated in its pP he parcels comp Commission, rior to the Planning P ezoned to M-2 designation in 1977 rehensive9Development Plan. us r Comp an adoption of the Roanoke County be given to the lan recognizes the need for mixe The comprehensive p ro erly The and consideration should P P ro osed use. principles, h of the site, and the P P landowners, nature and topograp Y oining to the west, which is lant will be hidden the $easleyfproPertY add d to all traffic P tion of ment, an with the excep the letter from undeveloped and not zoned f or d ase e v denced by Aiso, attached as Exhibit along Buck Mountain resident engineer, VDOT, act on Buck F. C, Altizer, Jr., the Petition, there will be no adverse imP F to Mountain Road. halt plant halt submits that the operation of an asp area. Virginia Asp is not incompatible with the suritsnoff ce and on its property erating In addition, Virginia Asphalt has been oP designation since on the property under its M-2 nificantly shop facility and the proposed use is not sig the early 1980's, ermitted uses for its current zoning different than many of the p designation of M-2 General Industrial District. GENTRY LSE d ~4 ~- ~~ RAKES & Department of Planning and Zoning February 1, 1990 Page -5- inia Asphalt respectfully submits that it has Accordingly, Virg' sed and satisfied the concer the areasons statedaabovepand addres oining landowners. For and of adj etition previously submitted which are Virginia Asphalt respectfully as set forth in its P eference, incorporated herein by sts that its Application Count LandlUse Planabeeamended reque and that the Roanoke y halt plant on the favorably, erate an asp to permit it to construct and op property. Respectfully submitted, VIRGINIA ASPHALT PAVING COMPANY, INC. By: r G. Mi hael Pace, GENTRY LOCKE RAKES ~ OORE cc: Robert Q. Cunningham /200/08856-004/009.1tr ~y®_.5 VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY A 24.089 acre parcel of land, ) located on Va. Sec. Rte. ) generally within ~ pROFFER~ND~ONS 679 (Buck Mountain Road) the Cave Spring Magisterialarcel ) District, and recorded a98P01-2-27;) 98.01-2-25; 98.01-2-26; and 98.01-2-28ordsthe Roanoke ~ County Tax Rec TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY: in accord with Sec. 15.1-491.1 et seq. of the Code Being Zoning Vir inia and Sec. 21-105E of the Roanoke County n of g Compa Y Virginia Asphalt Paving Ordinance, the Petitioner, hereby voluntarily proffers to Inc., a Virginia Corporation, Virginia, the the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, conditions to the rezoning of the above-referenced following parcel of land: halt plant at 1) Petitioner will locate the proposed asp its engineers at a the lowest point feasible as determined by t lan int southwest of the plant's designation on the concep P po In addition, to its application. attached as Exhibit B lant is to Petitioner will excavate the site upon which the p feasible by its be constructed to a depth determined to be ers. Petitioner will also paint the proposed plant so engine as to blend into the environment. screening and 2) Petitioner will install TYPe E to supplement existing forested ground cover as ~~, o buffering ~j ~.NK~E determined by site plan review and approval. Rou+ancE. ~Nu t' a i -~~ ~ - ~ Petitioner will install noise reduction devices in 3) osed asphalt plant. Ze prop 4 Petitioner will reduce the dba level of the back-up ) ms installed on its trucks to acceptable levels as larm syste and OSHA letermined by the Department of Planning and Zoning regulations. of trucks 5) Petitioner proffers that drivers material from the proposed delivering material to or hauling will not bang the tailgates of such trucks after dark. plant Petitioner will install dust control devices in the 6) with all roposed plant. Petitioner will also comply P including air lations, applicable environmental laws and regu eration of the regarding the oP pollution control standards, osed plant. Additionally, Petitioner will employ prop the ro riate dust minimization measures as determined by app P artment of Planning and Zoning during the construction o Dep the plant, including access roads. Respectfully submitted, VIRGINIA ASPHALT PAVING COMPANY, INC. William R. Rakes G. Michael Pace, Jr. GENTRY I,OCKE RAKES & MOORE p. O. BOX 1018 ROp,1dOKE, VA 24005 (703) 982-8000 Counsel for Petitioner uw o~~s ~ RAK i pp~WOKE, VIRGINUI 2 /200/08856-004/002.poc t srs-rr «~w • g ~y ~~ ~~,~ ~ S ~~ 1 L~, v ss ',G~ M d~~~ ~` M ~ s .~~ c ,-~", ~ ~s ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t~-. \n ~ W~~ ~ ~ ~,, ~ //rr~~ f} /s ~~N s • i ! $ l i ~ ~ ~ ' ~ [.~ a ~s: t yVp~O~ \ ~ ~Z C{Zt ~ ~~ ~ .~ ~ _~ tf ~ ~~ ~~! d _ / ' Y ~ / r ` * ~,.~ ~ ,-' ~i ~ / ~~""' ~ s ~ ~ ,.` '~ ~~~ E~ ~ oef y ... e, ~ s ~IS ~-fie I , ~ ~~ ~• E ~ ti~ U z a CfQ _ ~` r d a, a W ~ U ~ ~ n O v m m O 4. Z p ~ V r ~ < t ~~ V t ~ V w N S < E""' ~ Z t N 3 ~ a ~ < <~ W, Z ~ < ~ U~SS > ~ W d V ~ G• < oo <o < ~~ ~ ~~i ~ ~~ o a ~' ~ ~ ?a N ~WYY Q p 8 ~i ~ ~ ~ 5 r Z w'^ m 2 Z ~ U _ .7 2 a d m < d ... U N z .. v x 1 ~. ~p N ~ rr--~~ h C O N Op O ~ E,,, d „ M ~ N, p M ~ ~ io ~ M N ~~ 1 `O ~~ Q ~ a~ O ~ 9 "" ~ N ~' z ~~ ~~~ ~~ ~o ~ Q ~ ~ ~ ~ Q ~ ~ ' ~ ~~ ,~,r,. r.~..ollgl~ a .~ a. s ~ `'"' ~ ~ 1 ra ~~ ~# '~ ~ I ... ~ M I ~ ~y ~~ ~ qtr;: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ j E@ ' ` ~~ I ~ A ~ 3 ~~ ` I ~ ~ ~ ~, '. ~ ( ~- .t - .: r: n:;~ ~ : 'r' i p ~' u Fr. ~'1' ,,.. a~ ~ ~~ ~ - .~ ~ - - . ~ s ~ e~' ~ ~~ s i 3 a ~ F ~i B~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~,~ ~~~~M / ~ ~~ . E~ a~ ~ ~ ~dd~ / . ~ ' A.r ~ '~' ht`. ' ~ I i ~ ~~~, .i Y g~ ~'` `s !~o $'W,g I ~~ 4 ~~ .a .. ~' 'bp 3 2,Q~ ~~ ~~ - ~ ~~~ g ~~~ ~~$ ~ 0 ~~ ~~3p ~g~ G ~~~ ~~~ ~~~y J ; ~ ~ E ::,:~,;: ?:af~ ri-~ ~ &9 rye,( a~_~,a"' '~ ~~ ,~ ~1J(sRTS CpMMUN ~p ~~,$s AND DS~B C ,QS P~lA~7 ~ viu ~ L V/RG/N/A M-.2 rO M• 3 oz - 2 ~'. z ~~ 27 ~'` qs. of - ~ ~-~ THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORST~TION CENTER,NTY AT A REGULAR MEETING OF COUNTY ADMINI VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE 1990 TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 27~ LAND USE PLAN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE ~~~ MOUNTAIN ROAD DESIGNATION OF APPRO FI B CK Y 24.09 ACRES MAP GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTH AY IN THE CAVE AND EAST OF THE BLUE RIDGE PARS CHANGE THE NG MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT~FD O TO UPI' VILLAGE SPRI TO PRINCIPAL INDUSTRIAL THE NG CLASSIFICATION FRO ONDITIONS HUPON NING ZONI WITH C CLASSIFICATIONN VIRGINIA ASPHALT pAVING CO., AppLICATION INC. was held on of this ordinance WHEREAS, the first reading ublic hearing was 23, 1990, and the second reading and p January 1990: and, held on February 27- planning Commission held a public WHEREAS, the Roanoke County 1990; and, hearing on this matter on January 3~ isement has been provided as WHEREAS, legal notice and advert required by law. b the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke Coun y, BE IT ORDAINED y Virginia, as follows: certain designation of a 1, That the Future Land Use Plan map imately 24.09 acres, as tract of real estate containing approx Co., Inc. and Virginia Asphalt Paving owned by described herein, south of Buck Mountain Road and east of the B ed generally located the Cave Spring Magisterial District be Chang Ridge Parkway in and from Rural Village to Principal Industrial; classification of a certain tract of real 2, That the zoning imately 24.09 acres, as described herein, estate containing approx located Inc. and generally halt Paving Co., owned by Virginia Asp a parkway in ck Mountain Road and east of the Blue Ridg from the south of Bu is hereby changed the Cave Spring Magisterial District, ~~~-~ Industrial District, to the of M2, General zoning classification District. 'fication of M3, Special Industrial of Virginia zoning classi the application 3, That this action is taken upon Co., In°' in writing Asphalt Paving voluntarily proffered That the applicant has Supervisors hereby 4' the Board of the following conditions which halt plant accepts: the Profosed alined by its will locate as determ lant's a. petitioner O1nt feasible of the p at the lowest a point southwest Exhibit engineers at concept Plan attached petitioner designation on the In addition, application. which the plant is to ~~B~~ to its site upon fined to be feasible will excavate the a depth deternn ill also paint the be constructed t° Petitionerinto the environment. by its engineers. to blend proposed plant so as screening and Type E round petitioner will install forested g lenient existing rov- b. to supp site plan review and aPP buffering cover as determined by al. devises is 'tioner will instalia tile reduction c, Pete halt p the proposed asP level of the back- will reduce the dba accep of petitioner its trucD partment d• s stems installed ° by the up alarm Y as deterTni OSHA regulations. able levels planning and Zoning and deliver- drivers of trucksfrom the roffers that material of such e. petitioner p to or hauling tailgates ing material proposed plant a k l not bang the trucks after d control devices inwtth will install dust will also comply f. petitioner lant. Petitioner and regulations, proposed P environmental laws arding all applicable control standards ,pet tioner air p oflution roposed plant. including the P measures the operation riate dust minimiza Planning and will employ approP the artment of the Plant' Dep of as determined b the construction Zoning during including access roads. follows: eal estate is more fully described as 5, That said r Virginia No. 1 on the southerly side °f roperty corner of the P at Corner 552, page 179; Tax BEGINNING the northeasterly D.B• ROUte 679 and hway Route 679 at Virgie Donahue ( hway Hig Donahue and Virg~~ nia 21g• 57 ~ to Corner ~Nto John C• thence leaving of 45° 18' 34 fi2o ~ 40n E • 154.55 No. gg.03-2-57) line S. 06 4; with said Donahue ° 1in20 'E. 70 99' to Corner No. thence with said Donahue 54 5 at the north- 2; thence~~N• 584.55' to Corner NO• D•B• W, Wilson Jamison (said Corner No • 3 0 39 ~ 4o E • erty of leaving thence N. 72 of the Prop _2_56); thence erty westerly corner Tax 88'03 of J. Dillon Prop 13' N°• the line N. e 424% thence 71 6; 1197, pag erty and with thence Jamison PrOpBn E• 687.20' to Corner eX sting iron pin, W. S. 32 16 ~ to Corner N°• 7 at an 8 corner tO W erty Corner No. 28" Eo320~•244„ E• 478.39' tO the W• W• Patterson Properly N• 73 erty' thence with 9 at the northwest ' eing the extreme patt6o 39 ~ p 6;pE • 155.51' to Cornere~~Y also b thence S S, 1 I„ Patterson P described pr°pertys of the C' herein- at the northeast arty corner corner of the 10 Austin Prop weoterlY06" W. 558.93' to Corner NO•Mamie V• with the 32 22 C. Austin and 2-g); thence of the Kinnie N°• 88.01- D.B• 1254, page 174; corner a 565; Tax Inc. ( 110 (D•g, 8830E Na& H Investment CO•~ 70. to Corner NO' 84 arty o 52' 24" W . 109 • 12 ; thence N .~~ 72 Corner No• ° 45' 20 W• Tax No. 98700 0 136 ~ W, 173' No.o13; thence S' bin; thence N• thence~N• 45.40' to Corner existing iron P iron 14 an 15 at an existing 18' 36 W' at being 171.30' to Corner NO•~ to Corner NO•~ Corner No. 16 o ~ ~~ W. 159.20 ~~ 632.26 to roperty; 43 35 34 67° 47' 03 W' herein described P thence S• corner of 17 being the thel ° , 57~~ 804.54e to Corner NO• Subdivision southeast 12 Y W• 40, Thomas H. Beasley ~ to thence N. 22 of Lot o 30~ 19" E. 50.00 50' corner thence N. 68 the width of a southweste98Y01-2_29); iron pin being the westerly line (Tax No• an exlsting 18 at thence along Corner No• 19 Corner N° • P • B • 3 ~ pogo 12, •58,. W , 299.99 Ro to 679 ; thence rig of-way of-way N. hway ht- 22 Hig the place of of sad right- Virginia No. 1. a ~~plat on the southerly E 1 205 51' to Corner o ~ 19 090 acres, as shownhalt Paving N. 68 30 24. Virginia Asp Buck and containing ac.) of situated along BEGINNIN property (24'090 coreoration, in the Cave Showing a Vlrginia Route 679) ~~ dated CompanY~ In°'' Virginia Secondary County, Virginia, Road ( Roanoke p,C. Mountain Associates, Spring Maglste made by Lumsden February May 16, 1989, tive date of this ordinance shall e 6 • That the of f ec 27, 1990. : s ~`j~-~ AT A REGULAR MEETIDN AT THE ROANOKE COUNTYE ADMINISTRATIONNCENTER COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HEL ON TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 27, 1990 RESOLUTION 2279-8 TUgLOCRIGRANT APPLICAT ON FOR THE PINRARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMEN COURT COMMUNITY WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors had adopted policies aimed and at promoting community development improvements in the County, has directed the staff to prepare programs aimed at implementing these policies, and WHEREAS, staff has conducted a community needs assessment and ranked communities on the basis of needs, and WHEREAS, in this assessment the Hollins community ranked first and the Pinkard Court community ranked second, and WHEREAS, the Hollins community development project has been completed, and WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors approved a Virginia Community Development Planning Grant to study the Pinkard Court community, and WHEREAS, the planning study has been completed and found significant community improvement needs, and WHEREAS, funding in addition to the Community Development Block Grant will be obtained from the Virginia Department of Transportation in the amount of $76,200, from previously planned utility improvements in the amount of $56,250 and from Roanoke County in the amount of $16,000, and WHEREAS, the improvements funded by the Community Development Block Grant will result in fifty-two residents receiving new and/or thirtY'fOUr .Wage, and road systems and drat and water, sealer, income levels, improved to moderate for housing have low alify of these residents six homes) ~ residents ~ do not have indoor plumbing WHEREAS, seventeen • ation and two of these homes rehabilit to public RESOLVED, that pursuant facilities. IT of Virginia THEREFORE BE ly for $700,000 NOW to apP Court County wishes the Pinkard Roanoke Grant funds for hearings, Block Community DevelopTnent roject. Hodge is hereby rovement p C• community imp for RESOLVED, that Elmer IT FURTHER the appropriate documents BE submit Grant sign and ment Block tO Community Develop authorized Virginia submittal of this application. 1990. of Februarys the following Adopted this 27th day and carried by motion of Supervisor Nickens- On Robers vote: Johnson, Nickens- recorded Eddy- McGraw, Supervisors p,YES None TESTE: NAYS : p, COPY -~~'` L~-~-u~ Supervisors g. All~- Clerk of Mary County Board Roanoke Planning & Zoning File ton, Director, ement & Budget cc: Harting Manag Terry Director, Finance Reta Busher, ties att- Director, Utili Diane Hy Director, Engineering Cliff Craig, Director, Phillip Henry, 1 ACTION N0. ITEM NO. ~ 9a _ fo "(HE: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE T A REGULAR MEETING ~ THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER A HELD AT COUNTY, VIRGINIA, MEETING DATE: February 2~7, 1990 Pinkard Court Community Improvement Grant AGENDA I TEM : 1~'/G'~ Q~ COMMENTS: ~ ~ I COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR " S---~-~"-'/~ .T/~pt ~~'~"~'~`"` q ~~ D BAC_. kGR~UN~° f the Pinkard findings and recommendations ° lication has As a result ofi the Improvement Grant aPP includes a Community royal. This grant Court Planning Grant, and aPP 2) Sanitary repared fior your review rovements, 4) Road been P activities: 1) Water system imp stem construction, the fioilowing 3) Drainage sy Housing rehabilitation. sewer construction~rovements, and 5) construction and imp SU__MMA. FtY--OF I NFO~ I ON Total project construction funding sources are as follows: costs are X848,450. Proposed 1) CDB6 funds - 2) VDOT Rural Addition ~) Previously planned utility improvements 4) Roanoke County - hook-up charges - The deadline fior resolution is March 9, made in mid-May• ~~oo,ooa _ ~ ~b,2oo -~ 56,25~~ ~ 16,000 X848,450 rant application abe submittal ofi the 9 will 1990. Grant award announcements ~- 2 AL___ TERNAT I VES_: Alt___e!"~atl---e N~"-1~~ authorizing lication and resolutioia Department rant apP to the Virg Approve the draft ant application 9, 1990, submit the 9 ment by March staff to Develop ofi Housing and Community No. ~° lication to the A1_te±'native rant aPP staff to submit the g Development. Do not authorize Housing and Community Virginia Department of STAFF REGOMMENDATIDN~ No. 1 Staff recommends as follows: Alternative Respectfully submitted, ~-L, Harri gton Terrance and Zoning Director ofi Planning Action Vote No Yes Abs Approved ( ~ Denied ( ~ Received ( ~ Referred Motion by Eddy ,7ohnson r1cGraw Nickens Robers As Board of Supervisors County Development of the Roanoke Community q Resolution Submittal of a Virginia ~;ommunity the fior the Pinkard Court Supporting application Block Grant. olicies aimed had adopted P and of Supervisors in the County, WHEREAS, the BoarddeVelopment improvements at implementing to prepare programs aimed at promoting community directed the staff has and these policies, needs assessment an has conducted a community staff of needs, and WHEREAS, on the basis first ranked communities community ranked assessment the Hollins and in this ranked second, WHEREAS, Court community been and the Pinkard development protect has WHEREAS, the Hollins community ervisors approved a leted, and comp Board of Sup the Pinkard the Roanoke County Grant to study WHEREAS, Development Planning Virginia Community fiound community, and feted and Court has been comp the planning study and WHEREAS, needs, community improvement Development significant to the CommunitDepartment of in addition the Virginia canned WHEREAS, funding from reviously P will be obtained ~76~200, from P from Roanoke Block. Grant the amount ofi X56,250 and ortation in the amount ofi Transp utility improvements of ~16,~~~D+ and the amount Development County in funded by the Community new and/or the improvements receivingthirty-flour WHEREAS, fiifity-two reside systems and will result in and road and Block Grant sewer, drainage! income levels, improved water, have low to moderate residents homes) qualifiy fior housing of these lumbing residents (sixdo not have indoor P WHEREAS, seventeenof these homes rehabilitation and two that pursuant to public fiacilities. RESOLVED, ofi Virginia BE IT for X700,000 Court WOW THEREFORE wishes to apply for the Pinkard Roanoke County Grant funds hearings' Development Block Community roject. hereby improvement P C, Hodge is community that Elmer for RESOLVED, appropriate documentsGrant BE IT FURTHER submit the ment Block to sign and Develop authorized ofi this Virginia Community submittal application. 1890. Adopted this 27th day of FebruarY+ Richard Robers Chairman 1 " ACTION NO' ITEM NO. OF ROAN CE TER p OF SUPERA MINI T~TION G OF THE O~ COUNTY 1rIEETIN THE R d of A REGU~ HELP AT Boar p,T GINIAr 199 199 J°lns ssi°n tY COUN'Ty r VIR FehruarY 2~ ' of FebruaCo~issi° the Ro Hoke C°un TE. MEETING pAM; COntT~ atl /pp5nn1ReVlslons to or GEI.1pA ITE Supe uss Fr°p • ons p, plsc Regulate Sign ENT5; NISTRp,TOR' S COMM the MI COUNTY Ap ehruarY ea ord man (2) on held o f the Pr° e° draft' eawork- GROUNp ; w°rKsess o~e~iew develop to d o f th ksessi°n BACK Hance d an t° the e wor the n ordi the B°ar cess used ce ~ At ue th ion °f t pt the slsented t° the pr°e ordinan to c°nti al discust the f lrs d staf f a f oeus ovisions r ve a lch time adalsol m~v and se the secon w ith ma7 °r pr Board app 0 r at wh The Board 19 g 0 r Session truarY 27 r 1 d occur • March 13 ~ r 199 to discuss untie ordina he orainaarin9 f°r March 2 e an °pp°rthelCo~lsslon. draf °n t lic lie will h with reading and pub on Fehr he Graft ordlnanc tfullY suhmittedr session s °f t espec ~~ yo eci i Kpr°vision R ' sp ~.._ anc ~ . Haa r iln9 oa d Z on in9 plrecto of pl Vote phs No yes Acti°n Johnson McGraw Motion hY Nic erss ved ( ~ R°h Appr° ( 1 Reeved (, Ref erred to ~orkSe~s~a,~ ~ ~ ~a TO: Mr. Terry Harrington/County Planner ~~~~ 1 FEB 2S 1990 ~~1~ raalnc a t;~~~s ~ Y FROM: Concerned Business persons of Roanoke County and the Sign Industry. Re: Board of Supervisors Sign Ordinance Work Session to be held on February 27, 1990. Pursuant to your request we are listie g edelat the February 27t a workhave concern for and feel need to be addr session. SEC~N '' 21 _20 Words and Phrases - "Taxable Value" 21-93-J Temporary Signs 21-93-M/2a Non-conforming signsldamaged or destruction M12d Off premise signs -amortization and taxable vase 01 District regulation -sign seperation (all distr~c ) OI District regulation -relationship of freestanding signage to lot frontage (all districts) 012d Monument signs O f 3e Number of signs 0/4a Signage of allocation Ol4a Business signs/maximum allocation 0/4e Number of signs O/Se Number of signs Ollie Number of signs pl Off premise signs Q I Variances sess~c ' ~ y to A to ~ N b tD t=1 b . ~d to hd ' ID w 0 w fD w K ~ k O C cr K o a s tr w ~ ro ro o o c~ w K W K ~ K .. b - b.. ~t cr w oa p W . rah arr ~~ ~' rord~ ~ as ~ ~~ o~' . F'• O N w ~ N o ~* ~ N ~ ~ a •d to ~ to N t~ x o w 7d o. et ~s m ~ a x H x E~ awl t wX O O O tD w0•K O K w O O X ~CXNwt-+~A ~ tD ,q MKO~ IDO A O w lD w O«• O tD tD G M O O• ID m O fD a :- ag« Nro a F3 xw wOw to ~ R ` K ~ tC0~1 a ~ ~ eN'* ~ tKD G ~W~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O NrM K 'T N p. r0 ct~ d~ .' :. O ~ N • r O t~ ' O N ct O ctt c~ ro o ~ ct ' Marq~~K vNi ~ 00 ~ctWN 'AO W ~ • F+~C M t fD A fD ro M K O K •• O a O ~ , N al cP F+ A~ O A~ tD fD N M M r . .• oa..~o~ ~ ~•~ a~aa~ a a . ~ ct g~ O cr w X r ~ r ct w w cr a a t rr~ cr w a c* ~ ~ -~'• . o~aaN.N~C~ c~D ,a N• wf~•.KVOi W O ~~~ ~ fttA ~N ~ .. .• O O tb~~A~C Nib O.wb, iTtA O MA ~ a ~ ~ et p. t=! H to OOaa0'O wr wOK aw MKOC<D K OcD~xC O w . r ~C X O a et W r N O O N ~R O et,~qq (D cD O M R3 A ~:a"CNwNKwcr0 roaa 00:~•~pIDG r r Kwa, r . .. .~lD«t3K~ rrw W a Kw roa ~ tD00 O • F+ O ro eD .w tD a - ' N a .. ~C a w K K tD O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . '=~OOO~~gNAf1 KOw• OK ODD ~ O . ' ''_ cr ID K ~ ct a cr ~- O w O O O acs K Q. ~~ et cf r w W a ., ,R OwX~Nw. WtQ"..1' a ~'~ w~C a0 A A-'gAM~w0«O ON tt ~rerM, C''CJ. 't7 crOa O ctOKK a tD ~ K O a g~ rw0. •wc~ O ONO kg~ a rt~ oCL~ A ~ -a-~ O ~ O ~ ~ n~ K' ~ N N O sy r" a0 a axr A K ~ N Na p.0 O Ow cr ct O' f~. c* ~G O r w Oct O G K r M M c't d ~ wra O N MfD p O a MK we r 'd ttt dcDK~r•. O~ ~ W O W w N N OK O O F• tL O b' p. m g O' N w w N O Nor cna KOw wO r*w w ~ Oc w e~• K o et w ~ v' ~ ~ a co ~ K M G .•1 ~ tf A N N Q' N .. ~.1. Cl . tsmAOwAg~ .N N carom to NOawID~1 tact to b v~waMOaar a a MIDa a w0 OXO N~ a lDr . -~~n~ ~ 0-8 ~ N.p• .~ ~ N B W~ ~ -'O ~F''FN+•~ Aea't ~ ~ • .30 OHS wwN ~~aro~ Q•~~ O ~~~ ~ tD a a pct a tDct K ~ a w Ko K~a .N .. •. 1~ ^eW N me oaf MK N.• ~ ~ = ~ w to m a O y N O G r4 cr ct O to ,•. ~~ M~~ Na n n 'J ~~ ,.' ~ ~ ~ ~~A~ C M n O ~ ' . wK p,N K r ~ O wx ~ro J 1..N ct Nb~afa~t+• Kw~ .'~QAON~N A~ fN' . N O ~ `~ ~~ K ~x ~ ~~t~~~ a~ ~ p K ~ ~ n A• ~ rt fN..p'FN+•N Q. .. -WOVV OMKN ~ ~fA ~{p `Jw * rox vb ono w~n~ 1-loox~ off w 7F N a w ID w M >r 1+• A- ~ G tD A~ W~ 1 b ~C ~ 01 t ~ W M ~ t 01 X ~ p. N F+• DC r 01 f]. W . .K r rg c K r rn b w r ~ ~ ~ : w~R r ~ ~ ~~ ct C K 71 d ' . 1+• :. ~ O cf C t w ct t K co ' ct cD R ~ w It 1•• • • c ~ Ac tD W ~ .. ~ Q. C! ~ A. w F+ x p- ~ fA ~ sti K .. . O m * ~ ~ ~ A . c D d A• ~ t t ~ °' K a - - ~r ~s R ~ W . ~ -~ M A ~ : A r ~ F+ Q. W Q1 A Q- O b x ~ a1 OD a1 O M'LS .P • ~O r ~i ~ O V 1 1~ O 1 1 1 1 Al ~"'1 {D • • 00 '. ~ W 0~ Ar f+ N N N -~+ W N N ~ O K O • ~o • . . rt ct O K ...... cD ~ • ~ ~ . KWwGQ! ~ tD ~ Rral • w~q ~ K -q OD tD W 1 ~ s+ w pi m ,q • A >z a • 1 p. rt N to VI VI vt Ott ro - a A =• a w ~ • • ~ m ~ ~ N ~ o t t c t r c A : _ . .. . ro r +, ._ rw ~ F, O ~ ~ N Vt A. W ~ w K ~ ~ N : O - '' . ! ! ~ W ` A- rt w . r~ • ID w ~ ~ bd bd bd ~ GI a1 b0 to 'd ~ b r gg v ~ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 sb ®O eti • rf ao t~ --+ w N F+ r w N --~ ~ K ct K Cn • ID O ...... ...... I W,q a ~ ~+ W N N O ~ 4 • [ VI tJl t71 CI • N O . .. ~ ~ WW ~'tt w ... ~w ~MMM W ~ k brt I •~ g ~ ~, 1 ~4 W ~R 1 tD ID ~D 1 ID A O• t ' ~ ~ • w ~ O O w N cD lD W tr1 tD 0 .; ' • ' . ~ • !T1 . •• vI to to ~• rt rt c* uI ct . . ~ 1 . ~ o '~ ' . ~ ~ N ~ N •. ; '~. I V W M W ~ • CI O F-• • K w ~ a t c ~R 5 ~ ct to ~ ~~ : ~ ~ ~' 3 by b0 bd fn UI p! • A~ ~ 1 r F~ N 1 1 1 1 F-~ W N N ~ ~ ~ • ~, ~ •~: ~ N W W N dl {A CI • • ;' o w ~ w r• w t!1 m O ' • n ' w • . ~ ~ ~ ~ n ~? n d ..NfAp! •_ W 1 • •. .. N ~ W • • ~! W J _ W .. O k ~.. ` ~ j • co al o z I 1 W ~D N F+ O1 N cr r- O G ~~ ~ A ~ ft ft 'f f f 'r ~ W ~ ~ M +- O A f' cr ct K ~ W OrSO cOrNm sv d2 oocMr rt • M M p1 Ql W (D b i~ n ~ o~ ct ~ o• M ~ M ~ N- W 7 (D tQ (D wp-c~D ~ cOf OuOcat r ~t N- ~ ~• O ~~~ ~ ~ 1Nr~~ N ~G w (OD ~ N N trNa~s ~ ~O~QID• N O (D ~ ~ O IA O F~ d1 U~l~ C*O~ ~ ftf}Mf'f • oo• 't7 tD c* O ~ lD MW fy M W O W ~~ 1 ~ ~D M F-~ (NOON w to cr v~ W ~ M~ i-n Noort O O O ~ ~ M ~~~ • ~ ~ ~~~ ct'C1 O ~ :rxocn WtD ftlA fD N ~ M ~ Cl ~ M M W --•• ct tD W , ~w ID f'r (D " ~ro 00 n W c~ a as n ~0~~'L3• C F-~ tb O cD N N F-~ DC [t ri In ~M~ ft1-+fll IDf~D~AO~ ~ Ul'J~C Mft o~roArt- ~ W !+• lD • GO~R~D O ~ LL O' f]. O M ~ ~ ~W Mdl 1~OOrS~4 ~C F+• rA d2 0 0 b~ao• era o ton cot rMt w cKD ... c~ a .. w ct cn E~ ~ a M N M to ~ n fi X an `~ w~ K I r b K N- pl r- O O to ~Otn ~ MO ~ O~ cfi • O' r-~ wrtb ~~K ~ N O O O M (D ft rt O~s'~~1~'C!• ~~XXcOtKvi ~ ~ ~ f'f N N ~ ~ ~ O O~ ~D•O DC Mft ctN MA cF• ~ ~ ~ ~ MBA V1MU1 nOtAOMr- tDMtR0100 NN~~q~ a~'~'Mwn a~`• `~~ a W ~ Or cf U1 O ~ (~D aMm M ~ ~ n w~ art ~~ ~x F+• O ~ O W O O M O N• 0 ~R x O cr :n ~. sy n ~D a, w fD ~d o N m rt ~ ~ ft fr ~ M r :r N a cn i-+ O 2 ~ n m ct O M rt a x a tr r ~D b ~i O u. 0 A W O N ~ w O M u. n cOr ~~ ~ w N~ O E A. ~ d1 O M ~.~. ID ~ ft w ~ ~ x W O ~ tED >y ~H n h O C >w N- O !p X w w O ~R W Ct !r- O N W N A O ct (•t O O ro r in W w A O ~- Of m 0 ~ ~.,~ m ~oo ~ cn~•v o•cn-n ~-~~ ~n mcn~~ -~-a -o c~D °Iw c~D "'I-~ ~ ~Im ~ m ~IQ-I~ ~ ° ~ ~I3 3' z ._. •p ~ ~ n _/" `~ .. is clearly and without question illegal and Subsection (2)(d) unenforceable. Section 15•ri~hts which may continueatand the only conforming uses are vested 9 time limitation is the two-year period i~o hlacenanoa6dition istime discontinued. Roanoke County s attempt p ns in agricultural limitation on the xemoval of non-conforming si9 ranted and residential districts goes beyond their authority as g under the State coning enabling legislation. ~ _ _- .~ `` ,~ ,. . . "~, ~-~- ~a ~~ 2~23~90 Supervisors to endorse to ask Board of the ballot for Callers wishing laced on consolidation plan so that it will be p people to vote: ,~~ G/ 1, Gary Roche oration Lew Showalter, Nelson Roanoke Corp 2. 3. ~~ ~ ~~ --~ `~. ~. ~, ~ ~~. ,~ ~/ ~ . (,t.•C.~ ~ ~ . ~~~ ~~ ~~~ ~~- _c ~ o . j ~~ ~. ~~~ l~J• ~ l~~'-~'~''` ~`~ l ~,. ~~ r ~~ ~ ~ ~~i~L~ Il~~ ~~ ~~~ ~ V ~~ C,,~~~ ,~ ~ ~ ~~„ p~ `" `~, ~ ~~ K~~~,t., r~7~ -~ -yam ~ Try °~ CD -~ -~, ~ d -~'` ~'~ ~~. /~~ 9`' ~ c~ a~ a3J~~ ~ ~/ ~~ ~f`~, ~ ~ ~.~ ~~ ~ ~~'~` ~ , ~ v~-~ .~ ~;` l ~ . ~ ,~ ~~ ~ 1 ~- ,~~-. ~j ~ Vi'a' ~ ~ (~ J -~ ~. ~~~ ~' ~ ~ ~ , ~ - ~) t, BEY "~ .' - I~ /~~ "~" c"~ ~ ~ ~. I,~ .fit ~"~ C. R L ~'" + f ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~~ i i ~~ ~~~~ ~~ ~~(i~ ~~~ ~~,~c_ ~ ~ ~ ,~ /~ , ~~~~ ~~ a ~ ~~ ~?~Z~. ~ mod- ~~~~'~-~"°`~ - ~~- ~ _ ~ 7. ,~ ~, ~~ ~~-~ _ ,,~,~- ~~ ~~~~ ~~ ~- ., ~, '~ ~ ~~ ~~Q ~~~ ~~~ / l ~ Z,,~ C''~~--~ ~..~~~ ~- ~~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ (, ~~ ~~~ O~ d l ~ l .~.~c-' _ ~ /l L/~ C~ ~~~ ~` ~~~~ -~~ ~~.- 3 ~i. 3 5 • '~ - .~ ~~ ~~- .~~ I ~ ~ ~~~ . ~y~. ~~~ ~ ~ t _~ ~-~-- - /~--~ ~ r ~~~-' ~ ,~-~- Q .-~--~ ~ `~~' C~~~i ~,,''/ ;,~. ~ ,Fu~<~ t~s~„~. ~ cam' ,~ rte.. ,~ uM.~~a J Q ~~a~~ February 22,1990 Dear Member, We need your he1P~ ' nal Chamber of Commerce's o i the pr PpSed Your Roanoke Reg1O to endorse and supp unanimously tors has voted or the merger of the Roanoke City and Roano e consolidation Plan f County governments. t to the citizens of the area for a vote in bodies must approve it prior to to be Pu 'rhe For the plan overning lan February 20. November, b~ local S a roved the p lan at their February 28• 'R°anoke City Pptvisors will vote on the p Roanoke County Board of S February 27 • meeting at 3 p•m•, Tuesday, Here's how you can help- orithe consolidation the county suPen'tSO1s know that you su°p fives at 772-200 an' Let ediately at the county to e, plan. Call them nmdentify yourself as a busineesmbener, emp y leave a message' if ou are one) or chamber m county resident ( y call the supe~,isors at horn etthrough at the county, If you cannot g e tele hone numbers: I Listed here are their hom P 89-9573 Dick Robers, Chairman Steve McGraw, Vice Chairman gob Johnson Lee Eddy Harry Nickens Richard M• Lynn President 9 384-6806 362-5074 77 4.2930 890-3552 ~( ~OL~1-~.F Z~ ~ z o ,. a 18 '~° 88 SFSQUiCENTENN~P~ A Beautiful Beginning COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE AII~AMERICA Gr ~ '' I ~' ~~~~~ 1979 ~~ ~~ 1989 C~~~~t Ms. Carolyn S. Ross, Vinton Town Council p, O. Box 338 February 28, 1990 Clerk Vinton, Virginia 24179 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS RICHARD W. BORERS. CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT STEVEN A. cMC~We ~~RIAL DISTRICT LEE B. EDDY WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL D15TRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLNS MAGLSTERL4L DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DLSTRIGT Dear Ms. Ross: of Resolution No. 22790-3 authori-zing the Attached is a copy execution of a consolidation agreement between the County o Roanoke and the City of Roanoke . This resolution wa ~ abdop wed 2by Y the Board of Supervisors at their meeting on Tuesday, 1990. Zf you need further information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, ~YZ~-~' ~ Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors bjh Attachment P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24018-0798 <703> 772-2004 O~ ROAN ,~.~ L z~ ~ Z ~j a 18 . E~ 88 S~SQUICENTENN\P\' A Beautifu/Beginning COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE Mr. Forest Jones, Clerk Salem City Council P. O. Box 869 Salem, Virginia 24153 Dear Mr. Jones: February 28, 1990 AII~MAERI(AGT1' 1' I ~'' 1979 1989 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS RICHARD W. ROBERS. CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERUIL DISTRICT STEVEN A MCGRAW. VICE-CHAIRMAN CATAWEiA MAGISTERUIL. DISTRKT LEE B. EDDY WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L JOHNSON HDLLINS MAGLSTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT Attached is a copy of Resolution No. 22790-3 authorizing the execution of a consolidation agreement between the County of Roanoke and the City of Roanoke. This resolution was adopted by the Board of Supervisors at their meeting on Tuesday, February 27, 1990. If you need further information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, ~- Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors bjh Attachment (~1~Lin~~ II~ ~DM1TA~2P P.O. BOX 29800 • ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24018-07 9 8 • <703> 772-2004 z~ ~ _ J a 18 E~ 88 SFSQUICENTENN~P~ A Btauli'ul Beginning COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE February 28, 1990 Ms. Mary F. Parker, Clerk Roanoke City Council 215 Church Avenue, S.W. Roanoke, Virginia 24011 Dear Myer: RICHARD W. ROBERS. CHAIRMAN UVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT STEVEN A. MCGRAW. VICE-CHAIRMAN UTAWBA MAGISTERAL DISTRICT LEE B. EDDY WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOllINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON 6AAGISTERUL DISTRICT Attached is a copy of Resolution No. 22790-3 authorizing the execution of a consolidation agreement between the County of Roanoke and the City of Roanoke. This resolution was adopted by the Board of Supervisors at their meeting on Tuesday, February 27, 1990. If you need further information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors bjh Attachment C~aunig of +~nttnake AII~AMERIG pTr 1'~ ~~' 1979 1989 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS P.O. BOX 29800 • ROANOKE. VIRGiNiA 24018-0798 • (703) 772-2004 F~I~F ~ i 7 ~ J a 18 E50 88 sFSQVICENTENN~P~ A Bcauti~ulBeginning COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE February 28, 1990 Rev. Laney Mofield Colonial Avenue Baptist Church 4165 Colonial Avenue, S.W. Roanoke, VA 24018 Dear Reverend Mofield: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS RICHARD W. ROBERS, CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERAL DISTRICT STEVEN A. MCGRAW, VICE-CHAIRMAN CATAWE3A MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT LEE B. EDDY WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERAL DISTRICT On behalf of the Board of Supervisors, I would like to take this opportunity to let you know of our appreciation for your attending the meeting on Tuesday, February 27, 1990 to offer the invocation. We feel it is most important to ask God's blessing on these meetings so that all is done according to His will and for the good of all citizens. Thank you for sharing your time with us. bjh ALL AMERICA CITY ~~~ '' ~ I ~~~~~ ~~ ~~~~~r~~ 1979 1989 Sincerely, Richar W. Robers, Chairman Roanoke County Board of Supervisors P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24018-0798 • (703) 772-2004 O~ AOANp~,~ i L h p Z J 'a2 X18 E50 88 ~ SFSQUICENTENN~P~ A Beautiful8eginning COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE ALLAM~ ~ ~~~~~~ ~~~n~ ~~ ,~~ p ~~~~• 1979 1989 Ms. Martha Ferrell 6213 Nell Circle Roanoke, VA 24019 Dear Ms. Ferrell: February 28, 1990 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS RICHARD W. ROBERS. CHAIRMAN GYE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT STEVEN A. MCGRAW, VICE-CHAIRMAN GTAWBA MAGISTERL4L DISTRICT LEE B. EDDY WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOWNS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL D157RICT At their regular meeting on Tuesday, February 27, 1990, the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors unanimously approved the request of the Roanoke County School Food Service Association for a raffle permit. The raffle will be conducted on May 4, 1990. The fee has been paid and your receipt is enclosed. You may consider this letter to be your permit, and I suggest it be displayed on the premises where the raffle is to be conducted. The State Code provides that raffle and bingo permits be issued on a calendar-year basis and such permits issued will expire on December 31, 1990. This permit, however, is only valid on the date specified in your application. PLEASE READ YOUR APPLICATION CAREFULLY. YOU HAVE AGREED TO COMPLY WITH STATE AND LOCAL, REGULATIONS AND FAILURE TO COMPLYMAYRESULT I1VCRIMINAL PENALTIESAND REVOKLVVG OF YOUR PERM77: YOU MUST FILE A FINANCIAL REPORT BY NOVEMBER 1 OF EACH CALENDAR YEAR PLEASE SUBMITA NEWAPPLICATIONAT LEAST 60 DAYS PRIOR TO DATE OR DATES YOUR ORC~IIVIZATTON PLANS TO HOLD BINGO OR RAFFLES PERMITS EXPIRE ONDECEMBER 3l OFEACH CALENDAR YF~4R If I may be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me at 772-2003. Sincerely, Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisor bjh Enclosures cc: Commissioner of the Revenue Commonwealth Attorney County Treasurer P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24018-0798 • (703) 772-2004 ~ aoaN ~. F ~. Z 21 a? 18 E50 88 ~~SDUICENTENNIP~ A Beauti'u/Beginning COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE AlL ~AMFRICA CITY ~~~n~ ~ ~ ~ I I i. u~ .~u~n~ ~~ 1979 1989 February 28, 1990 Mr. Fred Altizer, Resident Engineer Virginia Department of Transportation P• 0. Box 3071 Salem, Virginia 24153 Dear Mr. Altizer: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS RICHARD W. BORERS. CHAIRMAN GVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT STEVEN A. MCGRAW. VICE-CHAIRMAN GTAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON WOWNS MAGISTERLIL DISTRICT HARRY C. PIICKEN$ VINTON MAGISTERW- DISTRICT At their meeting on February 28 approved a motion made b 1990, The Board of Supervisors VDOT remove the "No LeftyTurne signs atbthehentrances t Drive and Commander Drive, questing that They further re o Malvern at Abney Drive remain quested that the sign "cruisers" from driving in thenBo ley Hills con-it-unit to discourage was passed in response from citizens who have been inconvenienced by the signals. On behalf of the Board of Supervisors, I wish to ex Tess appreciation to VDOT for their efforts to assist those citizens who have been so negatively impacted by the cruising situation. SinrerelY, ~~ r CC: Supervisor Bok Board Reading Mary H. Allen, L. Johnson Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator File Clerk to the Board P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24018-0798 • <703) 772.2004 o~~~F ~ ~• 2 ; A ~ 0 2 a 18 E50 88 $FSDU-CENTEN N~p~ A Beautiru/Beginning COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE ALI~AMERILA LITY ~111ZIT~ ~ ~~i II. ~~ ,~u~ ~ ~~~~ 1979 1989 Mr. Evans B. Jessee 404 Shenandoah Building Roanoke, Va. 24011 Dear Mr. Jessee: February 28, 1990 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS RICHARD W. ROBER$. CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERL4L DISTRICT STEVEN A. MCGRAW, VICE-CHAIRMAN CATAVdBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL OLS'ETRIDC'YT BOB L. ,JOHNSON HOWNS MAGISTERIAL CISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT At their meeting on February 27 Supervisors authorized an extension tof the oco tact ywBthrd of Catholic Diocese of Richmond to purchase county owned the the City of Salem. The new extension will expire Marchr3perty in 2 hope this extension will allow you to successfull co ' 1990. engineering work needed to determine the feasibility of theese the system. ptic Sin rely, ~~ ~t~ Elmer C. Hodge ~ County Administrator CC: Mary H. Allen, Clerk to the Board P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 (7031 772.24 X08 2l3SN3dSI0 ~S OSZ ~ j~~ avd 1HS os o~ ez L~OApN3l~l~.~3 00-EZ 4VdWd < ~ ~ ~~ -.n ~ a le~adp. ~ J' llb'O ano,~ O3Nan13a 1N3Jdn nO~l 33S 01 S1NtYM Nlb'Jd llb'O IIIM nO.l 33S Ol O311bO llb'O 3Sb'3ld uoisuaix3 O3NOHd3l31 ~agwnN apo~ easy ~~ - ~~ auoyd ~o ~` 1no a~r3 `" O~ 371HM .~ ~~a~ep n TE LE PH ON E (703) 345-1420 EUANS B. JESSEE ATTORNEY AT LAW 404 SHENANDOAH BUILDING ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24011 FebP~uary 22, 1990 TELEFAX (703)343-5698 Mr. Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 RE: 37.86 acre tract, City of Salem Proposed purchase by Catholic Diocese of Richmond Dear Elmer: I have just received information from the Roanoke Catholic School Committee that the engineering work needed to determine the feasibility of a septic system on the above property is almost completed but will probably not be ready until a few days after March 1, which is the date of expiration on our most recent extension of the contract. I would therefore respectfully request an additional extension to and including March 30, 1990, if this is agreeable with the Board of Supervisors. I would appreciate it if you would present this request to them, again with our thanks for their previous cooperation in extending our date for settlement. With best regards, I am, Yours very truly, ~.~_.~ r ~'~~~ ~` ~~.~~k~_ Evans B. -see EBJ:sjo cc Bishop Walter F. Sullivan John F. Barrett Dr. Robert L. A. Keeley Karen M. Mabry, Principal AN ~. _~ z 18 F~; 88 aEgOUICENTENN~~'~ A Bea~ti/u/Beginning COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE (~nuntg of ~Rattnnke March 1, 1990 Mrs. Alice Gillespie 5513 Daytona Road Roanoke, VA 24018 Dear Mrs. Gillespie: ~'~' I 1979 1989 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS RICHARD W. ROBERS. CFWRI-(MI UVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL Q15TRILT STEVEN A. MCGRAW. VICE•CHAIRMAN UTAWBA MAGISTERIAL OLSTRICT LEE B. EDDY vVIP106oR Hn i e MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT Boe L..toF(NSON HOWNS MAGISTERIAL orsTAlcT HARRY C. NICKENS vwTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT The Board of Supervisors have asked me to express their sincere appreciation for your previous service to the Parks & Recreation Advisory Commission. Citizens so responsive to the needs of their community and willing to give of themselves and their time are indeed all too scarce. Sincerely, ~ ~~-~ Mary H. Allen, C-erk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors MHA/bjh Enclosure cc: Mr. D. Keith Cook, Director Human Resources P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24018-0798 • (703) 772-2004 AN ~. i Z~ 2 a 18 .~ 88 +EaovicE~rteNN~~'~ A Bcauti~u/Beginning COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE Mrs. Anne Renner 2131 Castle Lane, S.W. Roanoke, VA 24018 Dear Mrs Renner: March 1, 1990 IIII~IWEIpfaGTt '' I I'' 1979 1989 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS RIC)iARD W. ROBERS. CHAIRMAN GVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT STEVEN A MCGRAW. VICE-CHAIRMAN GTAWBA MAGISTERIAL 045TRICT LEE B. EDDY WINDSOR NLLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HDI,).1d5 MAGISTERIAL DIS'TRIGT HARRY C. NICKENS VNTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT This is to advise that at their meeting held on Tuesday, February 27, 1990, the Board of Supervisors voted unanimously to appoint you as a member of the Health Department Board of Directors for atwo- year term, beginning November 26, 1989 and expiring on November 26, 1991. State law provides that any person elected, re-elected, appointed, or re-appointed to any body be furnished a copy of the Freedom of Information Act; your copy of this act as amended July, 1989, is enclosed. We are also sending you a copy of the Conflicts of Interest Act, as amended July, 1989. On behalf of the Supervisors and the citizens of Roanoke County, please accept our sincere thanks and appreciation for your willingness to accept this appointment. Very truly yours, Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors bjh Enclosures cc: Dr. Margaret Hagan, Director Alleghany Health District C~nuntg of ~Rnttnnke P.O. BOX 29800 • ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24016-0796 • (703) 772-2004 AN ,1, 9 a 18 ~ 88 tE+Ot/ICENTENN\1~\' A Bsauti~u/Beginning COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE Ms. Karen Padgett 6434 Greenway Drive Roanoke, VA 24019 Dear Ms. Padgett: March 1, 1990 ~l-~YIEIMC~ CITT '~II~' 1979 1989 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS RICHARD W. R08ER5. CFIAIRMAN GVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT STEVEN A MCGRAW. VICE•CliAIRMAN GTAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT LEE 8. EDDY WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERYIL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON NOLLINS MAGISTERYIL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICI(ENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT This is to advise that at their meeting held on Tuesday, February 27, 1990, the Board of Supervisors voted unanimously to appoint you as a member of the Parks & Recreation Advisory commission for a three-year term, beginning June 30, 1989, and expiring on June 30, 1992. State law provides that any person elected, re-elected, appointed, or re-appointed to any body be furnished a copy of the Freedom of Information Act; your copy of this act as amended July, 1989, is enclosed. We are also sending you a copy. of the Conflicts of Interest Act, as amended July, 1989. On behalf of the Supervisors and the citizens of Roanoke County, please accept our sincere thanks and appreciation for your willingness to accept this appointment. Very truly yours, ~-y~ 9d. cae.er..~~ Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors bjh Enclosures cc: Steve Carpenter, Director, Parks & Recreation (aunty of ~nttnnke P.O. BOX 29600 • ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24016-0796 (703> 772-2004 AN ~. a ~8 rt~ ~ +~sOtJICENTENNI'`' A Btawifu/Btginning COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE C~auntg of ~Rnttnnke March 1, 1990 Mr. Kenneth W. Lussen 3154-73 Berry Lane. Roanoke, VA 24018 Dear Mr. Lussen: Atl •AIIEI1tA GTT '' I ~' ~ 1979 1989 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS RICHARD W. R06ER5. CHAIRMAN GVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL. DSSTRICT STEVEN. A. MCGRAW. VICE-CHIURMAN GTAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT LEE 8. EDDY WINDSOR tIB.LS ruGlsT><RUL DGTItlC.T BOB L .JOhwSON rloua+s MAGISTERIAL Db TT1K.'T HARRY C. NICICEfJS VWTDN MAGI~aTERIALOLSTRICT This is to advise that at their meeting held on Tuesday, February 27, 1990, the Board of Supervisors voted unanimously to appoint you as a member of the Grievance Panel for atwo-year term. Your term will expire on February 23, 1992. State law provides that any person elected, re-elected, appointed, or re-appointed to any body be furnished a copy of the Freedom of Information Act; your copy of this act as amended July, 1989, is enclosed. We are also sending you a copy of the Conflicts of Interest Act, as amended July, 1989. On behalf of the Supervisors and the citizens of Roanoke County, please accept our sincere thanks and appreciation for your willingness to accept this appointment.. Very truly yours, J~ - Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors bjh Enclosures cc: D. Keith Cook, Director, Human Resources P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24018-0798 • (703) 772-2004 MEMO - 2/13/90 To: Supervisors, Ma~r,Y~A~llen From: Lee B. Eddy ~JX--~CSL~ Subject: Appointment to Health Dept. Board of Directors A vacancy has existed in the Health Department Board of Directors since 11/26/89. Ms. Susan Adcock, who held the Prointed.twDryear term, has indicated she doesestedwMsh Adcockrforpthe position, has Nickens, who originally Bugg said he does not have another candidate. I would like to propose the following resident of the Windsor Hills District as the County's representative on the Health Department Board of Directors. Anne Renner (Mrs. Arnold E. Renner) 774-7583 2131 Cantle Lane SW, Roanoke, VA 24018 Mrs. Renner has indicated her interest in this position and her willingness to serve if appointed. She is an insigreatlasset to level-headed, consciencious person who would be a g Dr. Hagen's organization. Her husband is a patent attorney for G.E. estions for a person to fill this If there are no other sugg ort for the nomination of Mrs. vacancy, I respectfully ask your supp Renner at our meeting on February 13. MEMO - 1/25/90 To: Supervisors, Elder Hodge, Mary Allen From: Lee B. Eddy ~_ Subject: Upcoming Vacancy on Grievance Panel As mentioned to you on 1/23/90, I would like to submit a candidate to be considered for appointment to the County Grievance Panel. The 2-year term of a present Grievance Panel member, Mr. Eugene Martin, will expire February 23, 1990. As you can see from the enclosed resume, Mr. Renneth W. Lussen is extremely well qualified for this position, having served in many important capacities involving personnel relations. He previously served on the Roanoke County Grievance Panel (1976-1978) as well as several other County organizations. He has been involved with the Cave Spring Volunteer Fire Company (#3) for a long time. I have known Ken Lussen personally for many years and believe that he would do an outstanding job as a member of the County Grievance Panel. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please let me know. cc: Mr. Kenneth W. Lussen Encl: Resume RBSUMB KENNETH W. LUSSEN 703/774-7739 3154-73 Berry Lane, SW Roanoke, Virginia 24018 Age: 70 Date of birth -February 12, 1919 Place of birth -New York City, N. Y. Marital Status -Married Children - 2 EDUCATION - Cooper Union College, New York City, N. Y. BSME In addition I have completed courses in :Industrial and Corporate Management, Quality Control, Contract Administration, Administrative Law, Industrial Safety, Public Safety, Labor Relations and Personnel Management. EXPERIENCE - February 1984 -Present Self-employed. Consultant to George Gardner & Associates, an employee relations consultant organization, providing advice and assistance to clients in various types of enterprises in establishing personnel programs that comply with Federal and State laws, rules and regulations and that provide a work environment that is mutually beneficial to the employer and employee. Consultant and expert witness for Woods, Rogers & Hazlegrove on matters relating to client's impaired employees re-employment abilities. February 1983 -February 1984 Vice-President, Management Services Division, Sisson & Co. Assisted employer clients of Sisson & Company, an employment counselling organization, in establishing competitive salary and benefit plans and assisted employee clients in determining their potential career opportunities in the Roanoke area. April 1979 -July 1982 Executive Director, Virginia State Fire Services Commission. The Virginia State Fire Services Commission was the state agency responsible for coordinating all activities of the various Fire Services at the State level, providing technical assistance to local governments, Fire Departments, State and Federal Agencies for improving fire prevention and protection. Recipient of grants from Federal and State agencies affecting the fire services. Operation of the Virginia Statewide Fire Incident Reporting System. February 1978 -March 1979 Commonwealth of Virginia Assistant Commissioner, Virginia Department of Labor and Industry. Responsible for the development, implementation and enforcement of laws, rules and- regulations affecting all employees in Virginia. Compilation and dissemination of pertinent statisics, inspection of working conditions, mediation and conciliation in labor disputes, and promotion of safe work practices. February 1971 -January, 1978 George Gardner & Associates Management Consultants, Personnel & Labor. Relations Associate & Senior Consultant Consultant to various types of manufacturing industries; textile, wood products, heavy and light metal fabricating and food processing. Also to service industries; hospitals, automotive dealers, hotels and motels, farm cooperatives and distributors of machinery, petroleum, mine supplies and food products. Services included assisting clients to comply with the Fair Labor Standards Act, Minimum Wage Law, Walsh Healy Act, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (EEOC), Occupational Safety and Health Act and the Motor Carrier Safety Act. Other services included representation under the National Labor Relations Act, collective bargaining negotiations, representation at grievance and arbitration proceedings and acting as an arbitrator and mediator. September 1957 -September 1970 Eaton Yale & Towne, Inc. Lock & Hardware Division Rye, N. Y. Roanoke Plant 1966-1970 Division Staff Manager Responsible for evaluation and testing of all products. Recommending changes in design and/or manufacturing methods to improve products or reduce cost. Also, responsible for customer and supplier relations involving quality, engineering and manufacturing processes. Supervision and training of all supervisory plant personnel in all plants, world wide, Quality Control procedures and methods. Established annual budget, and five and ten year forecast plans for operations under my administration. At the Roanoke Plant had the additional responsibilities of Plant Safety Director. CIVIC AND TECHNICAL ACTIVITIES Reserve Officer -Roanoke County Volunteer Fire Co. # 3. Adjunct Instructor -Personnel & Labor Relations, U. S. Federal Emergency Management Administration (FEMA) Academy. Member - Legistative Committee, Virginia State Firemens' Association. Former member- Virginia Safety and Health Codes Commission 11971-1978) Virginia Emergency Medical Services Advisory Council (1980-19821 Virginia Equal Employment Opportunity Committee (1980-1982) Roanoke County Employees Grievance Panel (1976-1978) Roanoke County Highway Safety Commission (1975-1978) Roanoke County Industrial Development Authority (1971-1978) ~~~ ~. •n - ~~ ~':, e Rec . ~C~~~~ll ~ ~~~ ~O ~ Received By: p`~ Case No.: ROANOKE COUNTY REZONING APPLICATION 1. Owner's Name: V; rg; n; a Aanal'il t Pavi na f mm~~ncs Tnn , Phone:~74-4475 Address: P 0 Box 8395 Roanoke Virginia 24014 2. Applicant's Name: Same as above _ Phone: Address: 3. Location of Property: 24 090 Acres of a Va Sew Rre 67A (R„~k tarn, Rd.) Tax Map Number(s): 98 Ol 2 25 A8 O1 2 26, A8 Ol 2 27, 9R ~1-~-2R 4. Magisterial District• Cave Spring Magisterial District 5. Size of Property: 24.090 Acres 6. Existing Zoning: M-2 General Industrial District Existing Land Use: Rural 7. Proposed Zoning: M-3 S ecial Industrial District Proposed Land Use: Rural 8. Comprehensive Plan Designation: Rural Village Sector 9. Are Conditions Proffered With This Request? Yes ~ No X (Zf you are voluntarily offering proffers as a part of your applica- tion, these proffers must be in writing. A member of the P.Ianning Staff can assist you in the preparation of these proffers.) 10. Value of Land and (Proposed) Buildings: Tax Map No. 98.01-2-25 - land - 11. The Following Items Must Be Submitted With This Application. Please Check If Enclosed. Application Will Not Be Accepted If Any Of These Items Are Missing Or Incomplete: ~_ Letter of Application X Concept Plan ~_ Metes and Bounds Description X List of Adjacent Owners of Property (Attach Exhibit A) X Vicinity Map ~, A~~pl.s., ~~.,~~, rep, ~~~ Wr~~tten Proffer ,,_ a ~_ ...._ . .,X_~.. Water and Sewer App~Lxca~iori (If Applcabley 12. Signature Of P erty Owner, Contract Purchaser, Or Owner's A Signature Date 0 tuber 2(l, 1989 . Mic 1 Pace, Jr. Gentry Locke Rakes & e * $54,300; building - $115,000; 98.01-2-26 - land - $24,500; 98.01-2-27 - land - $600; 98.01-2-28 - land - $1,800 Attorneys at Law 703.982.8000 Telecopier 703.982.8524 GENTRY LOCKE RAKES & MQ~RE October 20, 1989 Department of Planning and Zoning Roanoke County Administration Center Room 600 3738 Brambleton Avenue, SW P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, Virginia 24018-0798 10 Franklin Road, S.E. Post Office Box 1018 Roanoke, Virginia 24005 RE: Application for Rezoning by Virginia Asphalt Paving Company, Inc., of a 24.090 Acre Tract, off of Buck Mountain Road in Roanoke County, Virginia, from M-2 General Industrial District to M-3 Special Industrial District Dear Sirs: Virginia Asphalt Paving Company, Inc., hereby requests that the property which is the subject of its application be rezoned from its current M-2 General Industrial District designation to M-3 Special Industrial District designation to enable it to construct and operate an asphalt batch mix plant thereon, as shown on the Concept Plan submitted herewith. THE APPLICANT Virginia Asphalt Paving Company, Inc. ("Virginia Asphalt") is a Virginia corporation in the business of manufacturing bituminous concrete or asphalt plant mix used in asphalt paving. It currently operates asphalt batch mix plants in Roanoke City under a lease with Rockydale Quarries Corp., which lease expires in 1995, and in Rocky Mount and Dublin, Virginia. Virginia Asphalt maintains its offices at its property located off of Buck Mountain Road (Virginia Secondary Route 679) in Roanoke County, and desires to construct a new asphalt batch mix plant thereon. Accordingly, Virginia Asphalt requests that the property be rezoned from M-2 General Industria?._~i~trict to M'-3 Specie .l.nr:d'u'~+:iic:ii ~i~~.iY~:i.. THE PROPERTY The property which is the subject of this application contains 24.090 acres, originally consisting of four parcels: GENTRY LOCKE RAKES & NK~DRE Department of Planning and Rezoning October 20, 1989 Page -2- 1. A 16.40 acre parcel (tax map number 98.01-2-25), acquired by deed dated May 5, 1978, from Norman T. Wright and Lois B. Wright, his wife, recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, in Deed Book 1091, Page 844; 2. Lot 41, subdivision of Thomas H. Beasley (tax map number 98.01-2-28), acquired by deed dated May 5, 1978, from Thomas H. Beasley, Jr., Trustee, of record in the aforesaid Clerk's Office in Deed Book 1091, Page 848; 3. A 7.00 acre parcel, more or less, and a 0.18 acre parcel (tax map numbers 98.01-2-26 and 98.01-2-27, respectively), acquired by deed dated March 12, 1980, from Thomas H. Beasley, Jr., Trustee, of record in the aforesaid Clerk's Office in Deed Book 1145, Page 312. Copies of the foregoing deeds are attached hereto as Exhibits A (1), (2), and (3). All of the parcels are hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Property." The Property is an irregular shaped parcel of partially cleared, mostly wooded, level to sloping ground ranging in elevation from 1300 feet to 1440 feet, more particularly described in a "Plat Showing Property of Virginia Asphalt Paving Company, Inc., a Virginia Corporation, Situated Along Buck Mountain Road (Virginia Secondary Route 679)" made by Lumsden Associates, P.C., dated October 16, 1989 (the "Concept Plan"), a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit B and made a part hereof. There exists at least a 50 foot buffer yard between the proposed location of the facility and adjoining properties bordered by large deciduous trees mixed with large and small evergreen trees and shrubs. The property is improved by a modular frame office building, containing 2,193 square feet, together with a 1,100 paved entrance road and paved parking lot. The property is also improved by a metal shop building containing 5,040 square feet and gravel parking lot, surrounded by a chain-l.in'- fence . ~ Po.r:~- ~ ,~, area of approximat~'ly ~.. ~~rr~~ ~ ~. ._-~ :~ ~: available on the property a total of 50 parking spaces. The property is not located in a HUD flood designated area. Available public utilities include electricity, water and telephone service. A septic tank-drain field sewage system serves the property. GENTRY LOCKE RAKES & NIO~RE Department of Planning and Rezoning October 20, 1989 Page -3- PREVIOUS REZONING By final order entered December 27, 1977, the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors granted the petition of Virginia Asphalt for rezoning of the aforesaid 16.40 acre parcel and Lot 41 of the Thomas H. Beasley subdivision from Agricultural District A-1 and Residential R-E District to M-2 General Industrial District, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit C, to allow the construction of an office building and shop facility. Similarly, by final order entered on July 22, 1980, the Board of Supervisors granted Virginia Asphalt's Petition for rezoning of the aforesaid 7.00 acre parcel from A-1 Agricultural District to M-2 General Industrial District in order to permit it to construct and operate an office building and shop facility for the carrying on of its business, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit D. Accordingly, all of the property which is the subject of this application is currently zoned M-2 General Industrial District. PROPOSED USE In the event the property is rezoned, the proposed facility will be constructed substantially as shown on the Concept Plan for the purpose of manufacturing bituminous concrete. The manufacture of bituminous concrete used in asphalt paving is accomplished by blending together various sizes of crushed aggregate and asphalt cement in a hot mix asphalt plant. An asphalt plant generally consists of several cold aggregate storage and feed bins, a conveyor system to deposit cold aggregate from the bins to a dryer, an aggregate dryer (which is heated by oil or natural gas) to remove moisture from the aggregate, a gradation control system, sometimes referred to as the plant, which separates and stores dried aggregate and feeds the requisite amount of aggregate into hot bins and then to a mixer where the hot aggregate is mixed with asphalt cement to make asphalt concrete. An asphalt batch mix plant also includes a dust collection and control system to minimize dust in the area. A diagram depicting these various components containing a Y~.~ ~'e~~:~ ... _ ~..~_ ~'~----~ .: u~p~:~~~. _w attaches:: ergo as Ex~~i ~~i: '% and made a part hereof. The gradation control system or plant is approximately 60 feet in height. The M-3 zoning regulations provide that building in an M-3 District may be erected up to a height of 45 feet. However, chimneys, flues, cooling towers, flag poles, radio and GENTRY LOCKE RAKES & (VK3DRE Department of Planning and Rezoning October 20, 1989 Page -4- communication towers, or their accessory facilities not normally occupied by workmen are excluded. The zoning regulations also permit the construction of buildings over 45 feet in height with approval of the zoning administrator. As is demonstrated by the letter from F. C. Altizer, Jr., Resident Engineer, Virginia Department of Transportation, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit F, Buck Mountain Road (Virginia Secondary Route 679) is properly designed and constructed to handle the truck traffic generated by the proposed use of the property. Virginia Asphalt currently has approximately 15 dump trucks traveling to and from the property on a daily basis, which would increase to approximately 75 dump trucks a day based on 1988 plant production. In light of the fact that the location of the proposed facility is generally level, and because there will be no increase in the paved parking area on the property, there will be little or no increase in storm water runoff from the property onto adjacent properties. All asphalt plants owned by Virginia Asphalt are operated in accordance with federal and state environmental regulations, particularly regarding air quality and water protection standards. Virginia Asphalt will comply with the requirements of the Air Pollution Control Board and Water Control Board, as well as any and all other governmental regulations pertaining to the proposed facility. ADJOINING PROPERTIES A list of the owners of the properties adjoining the subject property are attached hereto as Exhibit G. The requested rezoning and proposed use of the property will not adversely affect adjoining properties, either aesthetically or in value. As previously s~-ated,, the property is already zoned M°2 . ~~ :5 ° ~ ~-_ ..~ _ ~ ..._ . _ .. _, _. _ . , ~,.~-~ _.~ .»s~ac 'as- ~n of f i:;e ~,:.d ;err °: shop facility. The property is entirely shielded from view of surrounding residences due to the topography and wooded nature of the property. The nearest residence to the north is approximately 850 feet from the proposed facility, and is at the 1400 foot elevation point, approximately 40 feet below the elevation of the proposed location of the plant. The nearest property to the south and west is owned by N&H Investment Co., GEM"RY LOCKE RAKES & NIC~)RE Department of Planning and Rezoning October 20, 1989 Page -5- Inc., and is unimproved. The nearest residence to the east is approximately 970 feet from and approximately 45 feet below the proposed location of the facility. Accordingly, physical activity from the property will be imperceptible to those residences. COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT PLAN - LAND USE Virginia Asphalt has maintained its office and shop facility on the property since obtaining rezoning of the property to M-2 General Industrial District, prior to the adoption of the Roanoke County Comprehensive Development Plan (the "Comprehensive Plan") in 1985. However, rezoning of the property as requested will require an amendment to the Roanoke County Land Use Plan. The Comprehensive Plan, which contains the guidelines for future development in Roanoke County, provides that the property is within an area designated as "Rural Village". Rural Village is described as "a future land use area where limited development activity may occur", and "delineates rural communities at intermediate locations between the primary agricultural and forestal activities ... and the more intense residential and commercial development" areas (pp. 12,22). However, the Comprehensive Plan permits certain industries, such as mining and extraction activities, to be conducted in such areas (pp. 23-26). Additionally, the Comprehensive Plan recognizes the need for mixed land use principles and encourages mixed use development within zoning districts (p. 105). Further, the Comprehensive Plan recommends the adoption of a modified performance zoning ordinance establishing zoning districts to permit by right as many potentially compatible uses as possible (p, il). Accordingly, the proposed use of the property is compatible with and complimentary to the current use and the Comprehensive Plan. -`~,T~~IRgt~R~~ Rezoning the property to permit the operation of an asphalt batch mix plant will allow Virginia Asphalt to put the property to its highest and best use and enable it to more efficiently operate its business. The activities to be conducted at the facility are less intensive than are the activities expressly permitted within a Rural Village area pursuant to the GENTRY LOCKE RAKES & MOORE Department of Planning and Rezariing October 20, 1989 Page -6- Comprehensive Plan. The proposed use is also consistent with the flexible principles upon which the Comprehensive Plan is based, and is in accordance with the orderly development and growth of the area. Additionally, the proposed facility will not adversely impact the surrounding community in terms of reduced property value or burden public roads or existing utilities. Accordingly, Virginia Asphalt Paving Company, Inc. respectfully requests that its application be acted upon favorably and that the Roanoke County Land Use Plan be amended to permit it to construct and operate an asphalt batch mix plant on the property. Resp tfully s c G. Mi ael Pac , Jr. GENTRY LOCKE GMP/lcc 200/08856-004/004.1tr ~' srarww ~rw I ~MM I/ My A~'AII ~Z~~ .~ /~~M ~M ~' yV~' ~ l u .._~~~Y~__ ~~ • t=. ~~t ; ice'/ i1w~ / _ t~ ~~ i ~ . ~ ~ ~ =,~4 ~!!~1 ~~~ ~ ~~i ~ ~~ r ~ ~ i~ta / a ~ \ ~~ ..., ,ti.~~.~... :. .. ~ ~ ~. U z .. z a 0. a °' ~ n ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ (~ ~ a : a Z U ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ i Z ° 3 ~ a ~ >~ z ~ c °~ ~s < <'~ $~ ~ d v ~°„o <_ ~ ~~W a W o Q. Z ~~ ~~ ~~~ z~ o E.. ...] ~ s ~, z ? Z W ~ g Z o W ~ a Q < z ~ ~ in G~ ~ i < O f ^ W U ^' l ~ J 6 r V` U ~ W a m ~ d .., z .. ~: ~ Y ~ ; it 1~e ~1:Y, .~,," '~ ~__t k 4 ~:! Z O ~"'~ ~ w d ,e ~ $ M w ~ M .Mn g ~ 0 ° QM 3 M ~ V A ~ ~ ~ ~ z V A ..a ~-+ ~ L ~ Q Z ~ .. ~ .. C . N a i s ~~ N I L a" ~~ ai ~; 1 p0 C~ a ~~ B r ~~ ~~ q Y ~~ . ~~st P" ~~ O ~$ ~ _~ a.E \~. ~~ ~ _~ t ~~ s fit ~~ ~t ~~ ~~ ~~ i ~s~ ~# ~~~ ~~~ ~!i i. E ~ I _ _ ~~ r, i :;`' i ~ M ~~ .~ ~ I ' ~i 01 I% ,..... ~•, ..."...._. , ~~.~..", .~~~ .~.~, • 11:1-1 ~-o~ ... mar ~ 1VA. ASPF{ALT~PAV. ~ ~~~.~-, 10i17i89 16:27 X703 774 6154 ., , . . • ~~a COMMONWEALTH of VIRCJII~TI.A RAY D. rETHTEL COMNHS810NtN Mr. R. Q. Cunningham Virginia Asphalt Paving P . 0 . Rox 8395 Roanoke, VA 24014 DEPARTMENT OF TRANBPORTATION 714 SOUTH BROAD STREET SALEM, 24153 October 6, 1989 Co., Inc. re: Oear Mr. Cunningham: '/F 1.5'~C~Gr~JG'~i I~ ~ f~ 002 F F. C. ALTIZER, JR. AES~ENT ENGINiiR Post i)ft i rP Rox 3071 Salem, Vi rclini a 24153 Route 679 -Burk Mt. Rd. Itl~anoke (.:rnniL.Y As per your request, this will confirm our conversation relative to the adequacy of geometric standards of Route E~/y, Buck '~+o:,ntl~~iC~ad~i116ube Mountain Road has been constructed to a clsrrent standarr,, adequate to handle the increased traffic projected by your rosiness establish- ment. this highway is one of the few secondary roads in Southwest County which has been reconstructed to a higher standard. The alignment and grade is such that the increase in traffic from .your proposed `acility would be negligible in reyards to the overall traffic flow. Certainty, kiuck Nbuntain Road has become a major corridor for the- Southwest County area. The next important facet of this road, which wi11 receive significant review from this Department, 1 s the 1 ni;ersecti on of Buck Mountain Road anti (?oute 2Z0. As you know, we have a sma11 1 mp O v onto Bucke Maunt i n WRoadpro TIi s a shout d h l p l the from southbound Route 22 traffic flow in that area. I trust that this will provide information Il~eaningful to your company. Si nr.Prply, 7 • ~. F . C, , al ti ~~r '1r fte~ident Cngneer fCA/m~ TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21ST C:FNTURY 'F COMMU ~~ ~~~BS AND DB'V V/~2G/~v/A AS'P~At1 ~Av/~JG~ ~a. M-.2 ro M-3 98.01- oz-2s,26,27~28 • ROAgOICE CO~NT7t OTILITY DEPARTMENT APPLICATION FOR WATER OR SEWER SERVICE TO PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Date QcrnhPr ~' 1959 Name of Applicant Virginia Asphalt Paving Co.~hone 774-4475 Inc. Address of Applicant P. ~• Box 8395, Roanoke, Virginia 24014 Name of Developer Not Applicable _ Phone Address of Developer Name of Design Engineer Not Applicable phone Address of Design Engineer Name of Contact Person G. Michael Pace, Jr. Name of Proposed Development Type of Development and proposed number of units (Be specific) Construction of Asphalt Batch Mix Plant Location of proposed development (Furnish copy of map) See Vicinit Ma attached to a lication Size of proposed development in acres: 1-3 Acres .Give minimum and ma~zi~~~- ~ .v~=...~;`~.1~~~` ~Bse USGS Elevations~~ at which the individual water/sewer service MaximumionN Auld feet°MSLed: Minimum NjA feet MSL. Is this application for a development thaN/A 11Nbe Nj parYeSr section of a larger future development? - If yes, provide map of entire area if available. (OVEN) S i -tu re o Appl ' t G. Michael Pace, Jr. ,f:. ~~tn. yrY -y t «'`•~' ~: :y '4 . ~w+ ! ? •° ~~ ~ J ~~ '} 1 ~~ ~!~•' ~{. 1 x 1 ~~ F~~ .'tr ,' 1 ~ ~+~` ~, r ~ktS~ i ~ .~ ~ ~ ~ ~~{~} 3, p„y ' M7 ~; a .S t o~. }'~k ~°' "Fr1 f'r~ mayY. fi b . S ~~~'$_ ~, D',~. ~~~t~ ;;a ~r ~ ~~~~n1• V' ~~ ~, - ,:, r •, ~ ~7~ ~4~ t~~' . ~~~(, . yK~ ..s ti~Y rv ;! ~~~ ~:~~5 1' ,ttjj ~+#'F, ~r ~y t d'~ `z'" i 1'~~I i I~r. ~~ } e: ~ r . w S'. ;~ -4 9 '4r'.' r r .~y~r,",~ h ~ ~ #t,~ RA ~^~.~ ~ ~~ f ~}. i ~ '~ w t._~ tt ,. r , . ~~ti ~ 1 ~ ~ ~t'--' T ~d~L;a, ~i.. O: . ,y~ } ~~ ~~~~f KS' _ ya't ~~ ' ~ _ .iq.r 1F. "Y' ~?•. ~ ~ ~, ,y*^ -M r ! !"., r 1. ~ j"l~c ''+ ~„'' ~f f3, r . .. ,• ~ ~.~`~ ,;. ~.. ~ .~ {~D ~N~ I 0. ~f,;., • ~ ~ .. ~~}, {i.' ':ti"t~ ~ ~" .. . ~-~~ . t ~ ~ .. .. ~~~~~:. - ~71,.. ~ ,^ -. .. r.- ... r. 1 Ci i r' ~. ~„ ~ 6 ..~, r ~. C •~, ^. 4.. ;t ~~. •~" 'K ^ ~:. ~i ` I.. Y.+ 1 /\ 3 ~ ~~ t ~~ ~~ ~! ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ° -~, n '~ k , A ti ~ `~ ~~ ~ ^ ' '', ' ~ .~{ / S ~ ~I Y Y y 'V-! [ Y 1~ W;y~ ~~' F i. ';~}y ~f~,;. ~ . . ~~ + +rl~~ .. •• O ~ ~ ~~ G_ ~~ •~ • ~~ ^~ !~ tL ~ \ 1 Z ~` 1 1 ~_ f ~~ 1= ~~~~ s ~w iiji ACTION N0. ITEM NUMBER _---- STING OF THE BOARD OF STYE ADMINISTRATIONNO SNTER AT A REGULAR ME COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COU MEETING DATE: February 27, 1990 to Raise Legislative Awareness of Impact SUB~T; Resolution of Recycle Mandates COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND: Assembly has passed several ear the General waste issues. Each In the past Y ertaining to solid tan that deals pieces of legislation p five-year solid wastethe legislature. locality must now prepare a with the goals of 10~ specifically with the requirementsreCyCl°ng In addition, a 1993, 1993. The state has called 5o byandatorand 25~ hoes into effect 7/1/9• diversion by 1991, new double liner standard for landfills g SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: ort from Alleghany County. Staff received a request for supp deals with the issues that will also affect Roano recycling mandates as set The resolution locality must meet the County. Every Those goals may be unattainable wit ou forth in tort fr m the state. excessive bur en solid supp landfill. Other The new double liner stan ope ng aaunewa 400,000 per_ being placed on a locality 000 and S t where orting costs between $75' Cases, excep localities are rep In most ecial acre due to the new liner standard. burden on the lies and ground water conditions warrant sp drinking water supp support will make rotection, the double lin~oppSederesoluti necofssar recycling P This p the impact of the local government. aware of the legislature directly mandates. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: representatives of Approve resolution of support and forward on to General Assembly. AppR~VED: xodge txator or Di 1 ~erviCea -- ,- --'vpTE e~ Ab5 (~ f ~.mit enera ,-,_- ~o Y ner ~ t of G _-~' _ en _--' Eddy on ~ / / O S _-''"- J Grata / ,~ ~- 1 Motion bY~ ~iCke~s ~ / App~o d l ~ Ro~ez ve l Benleaed ~ ~ Rye (erred T~ RESOLUTION WHEREAS, solid waste management issues are becoming environ- mental, political, and financial crises in many of Virginia localities; and WHEREAS, State and local governments cooperation is essential in addressing these issues and solving solid waste problems; and WHEREAS, the County of Roanoke Board of Supervisors feel members of the General Assembly need to take certain actions in support of this cooperative effort; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the County of Roanoke Board of Supervisors does hereby request the General Assembly to take the following actions in the interest of cost effective and environmentally effective solid waste programs: (1 ) To establish ex std~ng privatelypownedtlandfillsrfromy discourage any importing large quantities of waste; (2 ) To adopt more reasonable sas gendorsed by sboth sVACO aand for landfills after 1992, water supplies and ground VML, unless local drinking water conditions require double liners; (3} To establish a program to promote recycling firms and markets within reach of Virgin an dloplastics for awhich goods such as paper, glass, recycling outlets are often unavailable BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED that the County of Roanoke Board of Supervisors hereby instructs its Clerk to send a copy of this resolution to its representatives in the General Assembly seeking their support for the adoption of these measures.