Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout4/24/1990 - Regular. o AN A't. 1~~1~1~1{~A C~ ~- p ~ , Z ~ n~~~ - ,~~~ ~ ~~ ~~~n ,s ~ sa 1.9.8.9 aESOU1CEN7ENN~~~ ., BlAYf1/u~B[~i1111~~g ROANORE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ACTION AGENDA APRIL 24, 1990 Welcome to the Roanoke Coonnt~ eBsecond Tuesday and the efourth Regular meetings are held Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public hearings are held at 7:00 p.m on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. A, OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.) 1, Roll Call. ALL PRESENT AT 3:06 P.M. 2. Invocation: John Chambliss Assistant County Administrator 3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag. B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS NONE C. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS, AND AWARDS 1. Resolution of Congratulations to Green Valley Elementary School upon its 25th anniversary R-42490-1 DAVID TRUMBOWER, PRINCIPAL PRESENT TO RECEIVE SAM TO ADOPT RESO - URC 2. Resolution of Appreciation to Eleanor Knott for thirty years of service to the Roanoke County School System. R-42490-2 ELEANOR RNOTT PRESENT TO RECEIVE HCN TO ADOPT RESO - URC 1 3, Proclamation declaring the week of April 22 - 28. 1990 as Professional Secretaries Week. RWR MOTION TO APPROVE - URC WANDA RILEY, SUE PATTERSON, CINDY RINNEY, SUSIE OWEN, CAROLYN WAGNER ACCEPTED CAROLYN WAGNER RECOGNIZED FOR RECEIVING CPS DESIGNATION ECH INTRODUCED NEW PROCUREMENT DIRECTOR, STAN ALTENHEIN D. NEW BUSINESS 1, Request from the Mount Pleasant Firsturchaseea for approval of matching funds grant to p squad truck. A-42490-3 HCN MOTION TO APPROVE STAFF RECOMMENDATION - URC 2, Authorization to enter into a contract with the SPCA to provide animal shelter services to the County. A-42490-4 HCN MOTION TO APPROVE STAFF RECOMMENDATION - URC BLJ DIRECTED STAFF TO CHECK ONOMPLIMENTS ONTHEPSPCAEON EFFORTSD HCN DIRECTED STAFF TO CONVEY C TO IMPROVE 3, Request frocialheducation preschooltgrant funds. federal spe A-42490-5 HCN MOTION TO APPROVE STAFF RECOMMENDATION - URC 4, Request from Roanoke Area Soap Box Derby, Inc. to construct a Soap Box Derby track at Walrond Park. A-42490-6 BLJ MOTION TO APPROVE STAFF RECOMMENDATION - URC BLJ ASKED THAT CORRESPONDWNOF THEDDECISIONTO THE REC CLUBS IN THAT AREA TO LET THEM RNO 5, Request from Strauss Construction for 100% reimbursement of the cost of off-site water facilities for Cotton Hills subdivision. A-42490-7 RWR MOTION TO APPROVE STAFF RECOMMENDATION - URC 6. Request from Strauss Construction for 100% 2 reimbursement of the cost of off-site sewer facilities at Cotton Hills subdivision. A-42490-8 HCN TO APPROVE STAFF RECOMMENDATION ~, Request from Town of Vinton to discontinue use of tennis courts at Vinton War Memorial. A-42490-9 HCN MOTION TO APPROVE STAFF RECOMMENDATION - URC E. REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS 1, Request for Work Session on June 12, 1990 regarding Spring Hollow Reservoir HCN MOTION TO SET WORK SESSION FOR 6-12-90 - URC NONE g. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS G. REQUESTS FOR INANCEC HCONSENTAAGENDAST READING FOR REZONING O BW MOTION TO APPROV22F90ST READING PUBLIC HEARINGS - 5/ / URC 1. 2. An ordinance to rezone a 2.56 acre parcel ur°ose 1 Conditional to B-2 Conditional for the p p of constructing a convenience store with gas pumps located on Hardy Road in the Vinton Magisterial District upon the petition of Henry J. Brabham, IV An ordinance to rezone a 2.25 acre parcel from B- 2 Conditional to B-2 Conditional (Amendment of Proffers) for the purposes of constructing a retail drive through window located at 451isterial Brambleton Avenue in the Windsor Hills Mag District, upon the petition of Springwood Associates. g. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS SUPERVISOR EDDY: (1) ASKED PLANNING STAFF TO BRING BACK RECOMMENDATIONS ON PROCEEDING WITH A GREENWAY PROJECT. SUPERVISOR ROBERS SUGGESTED INCLUDINGIPARRSAANDSRECREATION SUPERVISOR MCGRAW 3 ADVISORY COMMISSION. C~'I~'30RDAYSS(5/22/90).EC(2)O B~NOUNCEDR A REPORT ON GREENWAY PLAN IN HE ATTENDED A WORK SESSIC'OCOMMITTEEETO ADVISENBOARD oFGGESTED ESTABLISHING A RECYCLIN SUPERVISORS. ASKED FOR A RTEOAGEEOATTENDEDGMEETING OF BENTBOARD. (3) REPORTED HE AND DELEGA MOUNTAIN SCHOOL PTA AND CIVgCACLDEAD"DISSUEREANDCWOULDNNOT~Hp,PPEN. CLOSING OF SMALL SCHOOLS WA SUPERVISOR ROBERS: ANNOUNCED THAT A MEETTHAT EXPERTS FROM STATE, DATE AT VA. TECH REGARDING SMART HIGHWAY FEDERAL GOVERNMENT, MAJOR UONFERENCEES AND INDUSTRIES. OVER 275 WERE REGISTERED TO ATTEND C I. APPOINTMENTS NONE 1, Community Corrections Resources Boar 2, League of Older Americans RWR REQUESTED M. ALLENTO SERVEACTSpJ"IBREQUESTED THATSHERBEIN WHETHER HE WOULD LIRE INFORMED. 3. Landfill Citizens Advisory Committee 4. Transportation and Safety Commission LBE ASKED M. ALLEN TO CERVECT ART I,p,PRADE TO SEE IF LT. JESSUP WISHES TO CONTINUE TO S J. CONSENT AGENDA ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DIE CONSENT AGENDARAND WILLT BETCONSIDEREDE REMOVED FROM TH SEPARATELY. R-42490-10 BLJ MOTION TO APPROVE WITH ITEM 1 REMOVED UW 1, Approval of Minutes - October 24, 1989, November 15, 1989, November 28, 1989, December 19, 1989 HCN MOTION TO APPROVE ITEM 1 LBE - ABSTAIN 4 OTHERS - YES 2, Approval of Minutes - March 27, 1990 3, Approval of Raffle Permit - Clearbrook Rescue Auxiliary. A-42490-10.5 4. Acknowledgement from the Virginia Department of Transportation of the acceptance of .14 miles of Winesap Drive (Route 1084) into the Secondary System. A-42490-10.b R. CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS NONE L. REPI HCN MOTION TO 1. 2. 3. 4. )RTS RECEIVE AND FILE - UVV Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance General Fund Unappropriated Balance Board Contingency Fund Update on Automated Library System M. SERVICE AWARDS 1, Recognition of employees for their years of service to Roanoke County. EMPLOYEES RECOGNIZED FOyEARS, 20 YEARS, 25 YEARS, 30 YEARS 5 YEARS, 10 YEARS, 15, PLAQUES PRESENTED TO EMPLOYEES WITH OVER 25 YEARS SERVICE 2. Resolution of Appreciation upon the retirement of Jack Council. RESO NOT PRESENTED N. RECEPTION O. WORK SESSION 5 HEARD FOLLOWING EVENING SESSION 1. Budget Work Session p. EXECUTIVE SESSION pursasnrequestedCbyeRoanokegCounty Section 2.1-344 A (7) staff NONE Q. CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE SESSION NONE EVENING SESSION (7:04 P.M.) R. PUBLIC HEARINGS PLEASE NOTE: PUBLIC HEARINGS 490-1 490-2 490-3 WERE HEARD ON APRIL 10 1990. 490-4 Public Hearing to receive written and oral comment concerning the proposed annual budget for fiscal year 1990-91. 4 SPORE IN SUPPORT OF INCREASED FUNDING FOR LEAGUE OF OLDER AMERICANS 2 SPORE IN SUPPORT OF INCREASED FUNDING FOR SCHOOLS 2 SPORE IN SUPPORT OF INCREASED FUNDING FOR ARNOLD BURTON VOCATIONAL AND TECHNICAL SCHOOL 1 SPORE IN SUPPORT OF FUNDING FOR INFORMATION AND REFERRAL SERVICES 1 SPORE IN OPPOSITION TO INCREASED BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION FEES 1 REQUESTED FUNDING FOR HARRISON HERITAGE MUSEUM. 1 REQUESTED FUNDING FOR VIRGINIA MUSEUM OF TRANSPORTATION 10 MINUTE RECESS AT 8:00 P.M. g. PUBLIC HEARING AND SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 490-5 Ordinance amending the Roanoke County Zoning 6 Ordinance by adopting a new set of Zoning Regulations pertaining to the display of signage within Roanoke County, and repealing or amending certain existing zoning regulations pertaining to the display of signs.(CONTINUED FROM MARCH 27, 1990) 0-42490-11 4 CITIZENS SPORE SAM MOTION TO ADOPT ORDINANCE AS AMENDED BY STAFF AND INCLUDING SUPERVISOR JOHNSON'S AMENDMENTS - URC SIGN INDUSTRY TO REPORT BACK IN ONE YEAR ON EFFECT OF BUSINESS RWR ASKED THAT LETTERS OF APPRECIATION BE SENT TO THOSE WHO SERVED ON SIGN COMMITTEE. 490-6 An ordinance rezoning 51.62 acres from M-2 to R-1 for the purpose of allowing the development of a residential subdivision, located off Route 939 (Aerospace Rd.) in the Vinton Magisterial District, upon the request of Aerospace Research Corporation. HCN MOTION TO APPROVE - DENIED AYES- SAM, HCN NAYS-LBE, BLJ, RWR BLJ MOTION TO RECONSIDER AYES-SAM,BLJ,HCN,RWR NAYS-LBE BLJ MOTION TO TABLE REZONING AYES-SAM,BLJ,HCN,RWR NAYS-LBE 490-7 An ordinance to rezone approximately 7.64 acres from A-1 to B-2 for general office use, located north of Plantation Road in the Hollins Magisterial District, upon the request of Dominion Bankshares, Inc. 0-42490-12 BLJ MOTION TO ADOPT ORD AMENDED THAT PROFFERED CONDITION #2 REGARDING SIGNAGE DELETED AYES-BLJ,HCN,RWR NAYS-LBE ABSTAIN-SAM 490-8 An ordinance issuing a Use Not Provided for Permit allowing a series of 16 weekly summer 7 concerts at Valleypointe, near the intersection of Peters Creek Road and Valleypointe Blvd. in the Hollins Magisterial District, upon the request of the Easter Seal Society of Virginia. 0-42490-13 BW MOTION TO ADOPT ORD AMENDING THAT PERMIT IS VALID FROM 5/19/90 TO 9/20/90 AYES-BW , Sp,M, HCN, RWR ABSTAIN-LBE 490-9 An ordinance to amend the Future Land Use Plan map designation of approximately 0.5 acre from Neighborhood Conservation to from Transition and to rezone said property R-1 to B-1 for office use, located at 5304 Malvern Road, in the Hollins Magisterial District, upon the request of Irvin Warren Simpson. 0-42490-14 BLJ MOTION TO DENY APPROVAL URC T. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 1. OrdinannceaofeatstormnsewerreasementhtolthegTown conveya of Vinton. HCN MOTION TO APPROVE 1ST READING 2ND - 5/8/90 URC U. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance authorizing the acceptance and acquisition of surplus real estate (Cave Spring Junior High School site) from the Roanoke County School Board, and further authorizing the conveyance of same to the Commonwealth of Virginia. 0-42490-15 BW MOTION TO ADOPT ORD. URC 2. Ordinance authorizing the construction of a public sanitary sewer system to serve a special sanitary sewer service area including real estate along 8 Highfields and Lakedale Road, the cost theownerso be imposed upon certain abutting property by agreement, providing funds therefor, and directing that an abstract of this ordinance be recorded showing the amount that will be assessed against each such landowner. 0-42490-16 LBE MOTION TO ADOPT ORD URC V. CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS 1, Leo Trenor, representing the Southern States Body Shop Association, has requested to speak regarding Arnold Burton Vocational School. MR. TRENOR EXPRESSDEBURTONE~REQUESTEDMFULLNFUNDINGNFOR VOCATION STUDENTS AT ARNOL AND TECHNICAL STUDENTS W. WORK SESSION 1. Budget Work Session MARKET SURVEY SAM DIRECTED THATLUDING CATEGORIESCTHAT WILLEBETFUNDED ANDYLIST MARKET SURVEY INC OF POSITIONS THAT ARE BELOW MARKET. HUMAN RESOURCES TO CONDUCT MARKET SURVEY COMPARING COUNTY SALARIES WITH SCHOOL SALARIES. USER FEES STAFF TO RESTUDY PARRS AND RECREATION FEES, ADJUSTING OTHER CATEGORIES TO LESSEN IMPACT TO YOUTH ATHLETICS. ECH SHOULD DISCUSS RECREATION USER FEES WITH PARRS AND RECREATION. BLJ SUGGESTED SUPPORT CONCEPT OF VSRS EARLY RETIREMENT WITH FUNDING TO BE INCLUDED NEXT YEAR. BOARD CONSENSUS TO DELETE FUNDS FOR TRANSPORTATION MUSEUM AND HISTORICAL 25COOOEADDITIONAL) USINGLSAMET~ AS CUR ENTLYVFUNDED. AGENCIES ($ ~ BUDGET WORK SESSION SET FOR 5/8/90 AT 2:00 P.M. g. ADJOURNMENT 9 SAM TO ADJOURN AT 11:59 P.M. UW AN ,~ ~~~ j a % ~- ~ n~~~ ~~~ ~ ~~ ~~~n 18 '~~. ~~9~8'9 +ESOUICENTENN~~' ~ B~ww,~~6aynww~eg ROANORE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA APRIL 24, 1990 Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meeting. Regular meetings are held on the second Tuesday and the fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public hearings are held at 7:00 p.m on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.) 1. Roll Call. 2. Invocation: The Reverend G. Thomas Brown Southview United Methodist Church 3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag. B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS C. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS, AND AWARDS 1. Resolution of Congratulations to Green Valley Elementary School upon its 25th anniversary 2. Resolution of Appreciation to Eleanor Knott for thirty years of service to the Roanoke County School System. 3. Proclamation declaring the week of April 22 - 28, 1990 as Professional Secretaries Week. D. NEW BUSINESS 1. Request from the Mount Pleasant First Aid Crew for 1 approval of matching funds grant to purchase a squad truck. 2. Authorization to enter into a contract with the SPCA to provide animal shelter services to the County. 3. federal specialheducation preschooltgrant funds. 4. Request from Roanoke Area Soap Box Derby, Inc. to construct a Soap Box Derby track at Walrond Park. 5. Request from Strauss Construction for 100$ reimbursement of the cost of off-site water facilities for Cotton Hills subdivision. 6. Request from Strauss Construction for 100$ reimbursement of the cost of off-site sewer facilities at Cotton Hills subdivision. 7. Request from Town of Vinton to discontinue use of tennis courts at Vinton War Memorial. E. REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS 1. Request for Work Session on June 12, 1990 regarding Spring Hollow Reservoir F. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS G. REQUESTS FOR pLTBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING FOR REZONING ORDINANCE - CONSENT AGENDA 2. An ordinance to rezone a 2.56 acre parcel from R- 1 Conditional to B-2 Conditional for the purpose of constructing a convenience store with gas pumps located on Hardy Road in the Vinton Magisterial District upon the petition of Henry J. Brabham, IV 1. An ordinance to rezone a 2.25 acre parcel from B- 2 Conditional to B-2 Conditional (Amendment of Proffers) for the purposes of constructing a retail drive through window located at 4515 Brambleton Avenue in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District, upon the petition of Springwood Associates. 2 H. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS I. APPOINTMENTS 1. Community Corrections Resources Board 2. League of Older Americans 3. Landfill Citizens Advisory Committee 4. Transportation and Safety Commission J. CONSENT AGENDA ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOVED FROMDTHE CONSENT AGENDA ANDD WILL BET ONSIDEREDE REMO SEPARATELY. 1. Approval of Minutes - October 24, 1989, November 15, 1989, November 28, 1989, December 19, 1989 2, Approval of Minutes - March 27, 1990 3. Approval of Raffle Permit - Clearbrook Rescue Auxiliary. 4. Acknowledgement from the Virginia Department of Transportation of the acceptance of .14 miles of Winesap Drive (Route 1084) into the Secondary System. R. CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS 3 I,. REPORTS 1. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance 2. General Fund Unappropriated Balance 3. Board Contingency Fund 4. Update on Automated Library System l+I. SERVICE AWARDS 1. Recognition of employees for their years of service to Roanoke County. 2. Resolution of Appreciation upon the retirement of Jack Council. N. RECEPTION O. WORR SESSION 1. Budget Work Session p. EXECUTIVE SESSION pursasn~etoestedCbdeRoanokegCounty Section 2.1-344 A (7) qu y staff Q. CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE SESSION EVENING SESSION (7:00 P.M.) R. PUBLIC HEARINGS PLEASE NOTE: PUBLIC HEARINGS 490-1 490-2 490-3 WERE HEARD ON APRIL 10, 1990. 490-4 Public Hearing to receive written and oral comment concerning the proposed annual budget for fiscal year 1990-91. S, pUBLIC HEARING AND SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 4 S. PUBLIC HEARING AND SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 490-5 Ordinance amending the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance by adopting a new set of Zoning Regulations pertaining to the display of signage within Roanoke County, and repealing or amending certain existing zoning regulations pertaining to the display of signs. (CONTINUED FROM MARCH 27, 1990) 490-6 An ordinance rezoning 51.62 acres from M-2 to R-1 for the purpose of allowing the development of a residential subdivision, located off Route 939 (Aerospace Rd.) in the Vinton Magisterial District, upon the request of Aerospace Research Corporation. 490-7 An ordinance to rezone approximately 7.64 acres from A-1 to B-2 for general office use, located north of Plantation Road in the Hollins Magisterial District, upon the request of Dominion Bankshares, Inc. 490-8 An ordinance issuing a Use Not Provided for Permit allowing a series of 16 weekly summer concerts at Valleypointe, near the intersection of Peters Creek Road and Valleypointe Blvd. in the Hollins Magisterial District, upon the request of the Easter Seal Society of Virginia. 490-9 An ordinance to amend the Future Land Use Plan map designation of approximately 0.5 acre from Neighborhood Conservation to Transition and to rezone said property from R-1 to B-1 for office use, located at 5304 Malvern Road, in the Hollins Magisterial District, upon the request of Irvin Warren Simpson. T. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance accepting an offer and authorizing the conveyance of a storm sewer easement to the Town of Vinton. U. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance authorizing the acceptance and 5 acquisition of surplus real estate (Cave Spring Junior High School site) from the Roanoke County School Board, and further authorizing the conveyance of same to the Commonwealth of Virginia. 2. Ordinance authorizing the construction of a public sanitary sewer system to serve a special sanitary sewer service area including real estate along Highfields and I,akedale Road, the cost thereof to be imposed upon certain abutting property owners by agreement, providing funds therefor, and directing that an abstract of this ordinance be recorded showing the amount that will be assessed against each such landowner. V. CITIZENS' CONII+IENTS AND CO~NICATIONS 1. Leo Trevor, representing the Southern States Body Shop Association, has requested to speak regarding Arnold Burton Vocational School. W . ADJOURNMENT 6 ~~ ~_ AT A REGULAR MEETIN AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD ON TUESDAY, APRIL 24, 1990 RESOLUTION 42490-1 OF CONGRATULATIONS TO GREEN VALLEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL UPON THEIR TWENTY-FIFTH ANNIVERSARY WHEREAS, Green Valley Elementary School was dedicated on April 25, 1965; and WHEREAS, during the past twenty-five years, Green Valley Elementary School has been an outstanding example of public education in Roanoke County; and WHEREAS, Green Valley Elementary School has received numerous honors and awards, including the following: President's Council on Physical Fitness and Sports Demonstration Center Freedom's Foundation Award Roanoke County PTA 1989-90 Membership Award United States Department of Education School for Excellence Finalist Roanoke County Council PTA Outstanding Elementary Unit Commonwealth of Virginia Outstanding Elementary School 1987-88 WHEREAS, this recognition is due to the hard work and commitment to excellence of the students, teachers, and staff of Green Valley Elementary. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors does hereby, on behalf of its members and all the citizens of the County, extend its congratulations to the students, teachers, and staff of Green Valley Elementary School on the occasion of the twenty-fifth anniversary of its dedication. On motion of Supervisor McGraw, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES• Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Resolutions of Congratulations File Dr. Bayes Wilson, Superintendent, Roanoke County Schools i ~~/ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, APRIL 24, 1990 RESOLUTION OF CONGRATULATIONS TO GREEN VALLEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL UPON THEIR TWENTY-FIFTH ANNIVERSARY WHEREAS, Green Valley Elementary School was dedicated on April 25, 1965; and WHEREAS, during the past twenty-five years, Green Valley Elementary School has been an outstanding example of public education in Roanoke County; and WHEREAS, Green Valley Elementary School has received numerous honors and awards, including the following: President's Council on Physical Fitness and Sports Demonstration Center Freedom's Foundation Award Roanoke County PTA 1989-90 Membership Award United States Department of Education School for Excellence Finalist Roanoke County Council PTA Outstanding Elementary Unit Commonwealth of Virginia Outstanding Elementary School 1987-88 WHEREAS, this recognition is due to the hard work and commitment to excellence of the students, teachers, and staff of Green Valley Elementary. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors does hereby, on behalf of its members and all the citizens of the County, extend its congratulations to the students, teachers, and staff of Green Valley Elementary School on the occasion of the twenty-fifth anniversary of its dedication. '~ QP! AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIAr H ON TUESDAY O APRIL 24,N 1990DMINISTRATION CENTER RESOLUTION 42490-2 OF CONGRATULATIONS TO ELEANOR RNOTT FOR HER THIRTY YEARS OF SERVICE TO THE SCHOOL CHILDREN OF ROANORE COUNTY WHEREAS, Eleanor Knott has taught in the Roanoke County Public Schools since 1960, when she began her career at William Byrd Junior High School; and WHEREAS, Mrs. Knott began teaching at Green Valley Elementary School when it opened in September, 1964; and WHEREAS, since that time, Mrs. Knott has helped to make Green Valley an outstanding part of the Roanoke County School System; and WHEREAS, the Faculty and Staff of Green Valley Elementary School have declared April 25th as Eleanor Knott Day at Green Valley Elementary. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors does hereby, on behalf of its members and all the citizens of the County, extend its grateful appreciation and congratulations to ELEANOR RNOTT for her thirty years of service to the school children of Roanoke County. On motion of Supervisor Nickens, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES• Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None 1 A COPY TESTE: ~• Mary H. llen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Resolutions of Congratulations File Schools Dr. Bayes Wilson, Superintendent, Roanoke County C- ~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HE N TUESDAY,O APRIL 24j,N 199 DMINISTRATION CENTER O RESOLUTION OF CONGRATULATIONS TO ELEANOR RNOTT FOR HER THIRTY YEARS OF SERVICE TO THE SCHOOL CHILDREN OF ROANORE COUNTY WHEREAS, Eleanor Knott has taught in the Roanoke County Public Schools since 1960, when she began her career at William Byrd Junior High School; and WHEREAS, Mrs. Knott began teaching at Green Valley Elementary School when it opened in September, 1964; and WHEREAS, since that time, Mrs. Knott has helped to make Green Valley an outstanding part of the Roanoke County School System; and WHEREAS, the Faculty and Staff of Green Valley Elementary School have declared April 25th as Eleanor Knott Day at Green Valley Elementary. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors does hereby, on behalf of its members and all the citizens of the County, extend its grateful appreciation and congratulations to ELEANOR RNOTT for her thirty years of service to the school children of Roanoke County. C-3 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD TUESDAY,O APRIL 24~,N1990DMINISTRATION CENTER ON PROCLAMATION DECLARING WEER OF APRIL 22 - 28, 1990 AS PROFESSIONAL SECRETARIES WEER WHEREAS, professional secretaries bring to their positions highly developed skills, abilities, efficiency, and a willing attitude; and WHEREAS, professional secretaries strive to promote a good working relationship in the work environment; and WHEREAS, professional secretaries are devoted to providing able assistance to their employers; and WHEREAS, professional secretaries take pride in their performance and pride in their profession and set standards for the highest level of secretarial performance; and WHEREAS, the week of April 22 - 28, 1990, has been designed Professional Secretaries Week by Professional Secretaries International celebrating the theme "Embracing a New Vision". NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors does hereby proclaim the week of April 22 - 28, 1990, as PROFESSIONAL SECRETARIES WEER in Roanoke County, Virginia; and FURTHER, the Board of Supervisors urges management in the County of Roanoke to join in recognizing these outstanding professionals, especially on Wednesday, April 25, 1990, which is PROFESSIONAL SECRETARIES DAY. ACTION # A-42490-3 ITEM NUMBER ~ ~' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: April 24, 1990 SUBJECT: Request from Mount Pleasant First Aid Crew for approval of matching funds grant to purchase a squad truck COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~-t-c ~~ BACKGROUND INFORMATION: In 1987 a grant program was initiated by Roanoke County to assist county fire and rescue volunteer departments in the purchase of major pieces of equipment. All volunteer units have been encouraged to use this approach for major purchases. The Fire and Rescue Department Personnel and Equipment Committee reviews grant requests using guidelines that look at both the financial and service level standpoint. The decision for Roanoke County's participating is contingent upon a favorable recommendation by this committee. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Several months ago Captain Judy Mabry of the Mt. Pleasant First Aid Crew submitted a grant request. Captain Mabry proposed that Roanoke County provide her unit with a 50/50 grant that would be used to purchase a $55,000 rescue truck. The organization has raised their part of the funding through community solicitations. A rescue truck is a specialized piece of equipment carrying many different types of rescue equipment. It is designed to handle rope rescue, confined space rescue, collapses, and entrapments. The Personnel and Equipment Committee has reviewed this request and views this as a good project for the county. ~-i FISCAL IMPACT• Funding is not available in the current Fire and Rescue budget. Funding would be provided from capital reserve. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that Roanoke County participate in this project and provide funding up to one-half of the total cost not to exceed $30,000. Respectfully submitted, Approved by, ~i~-rice / Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator Thomas C. Fuqua Chief of Fire & Rescue Department ACTION VOTE Approved (X) Motion by: Harry C. Nickens No Yes Abs rove staff recommen a ion Eddy x Denied ( ) to app Johnson x Received ( ) McGraw x Referred Nickens x To Robers x - cc: File T. C. Fuqua, Chief, Fire & Rescue Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance Reta Busher, Director, Management & Budget ~~ ~~~T. PLEASANT FIRST AID CREW ~- r INCORPORATED 2909 JAE VALLEY ROAD ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24014 E3LfSINESS 981-0979 April 1, 1990 Mr. Elmer Hodge Roanoke County Administrator Roanoke, Virginia hr. Hodge, EMERGENCY 911 As you know we have spoken with you several months ago concerning the County assisting with the purchase of a new Squad truck. We have presented our specifications and cost to Chief Fuqua. At this time we are in need of your support of 50-50. This means that we have $30,000, and are in need of your match. The latest estimation on our purchase is $65,000. Please give this matter your strongest consideration, as you know our need to upgrade and replace this unit is vital to the welfare of our community. Thank You, -Judy Mabry, Ceptain cc/ Chief Fuqua Dr. Harry Nlckens We're There Because We Care ~oJ~t PLEgs9Z eccnu w~ ~r =Ci sTA/p C~~~, All Volunteer Organization A-42490-4 ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER ~ ~ °~' AT A IRGIN A HELDIAT THE ROANOKE COUNTY UADMINISTRATIONRCENTER COUNTY, V MEETING DATE: April 24, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: Request for Authorization to enter into a Contract with the SPCA to provide Animal Shelter Services to the County ~ r /' COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR' S COMMENTS : -,-~..rr~.~.+^~ BACKGROUND• For the past several years, the Roanoke Valley SPCA has provided animal shelter facilities and services to the County of Roanoke and City of Roanoke, so that these entities would not be required to provide their own animal pound. The County's current contract requires a payment to the SPCA of $1,260 per month, plus one third of the dumpster cost to cover the cost of operations . For this payment, the SPCA houses all animals turned in by County officials, attempts to provide adoption for animals abandoned and provides for the proper disposal of all destroyed animals. The proposed contract provides for a fee of $5 per animal, per day, to impound and care for animals delivered to it by Roanoke County officials. Based upon the number of animals impounded during 1989, this would cause an increase in our annual contract of $4,830 (based on 570 animals). The proposed increase covers increased operating costs of the facility. Animals confiscated and turned in by the Town of Vinton would be accounted for separately and charged to the Town of Vinton, since they have their own animal control operations and collect their own revenues from the sale of dog tags. The proposed effective date for the new contract would be April 1, 1990, the beginning of the fiscal year for the SPCA. This date also coincides with the notice provision of the former contract, which required a 60 day notification. Staff has met and discussed this matter with the City of Roanoke and their contract is identical to that of the County. Several years ago, the SPCA acquired a tract of land in Roanoke County with the intent to build a new facility. Preliminary sketches were prepared, but the construction phase was never started. The SPCA has since sold that tract and is working with the Valley localities to obtain a more suitable site. Most of the proceeds were required to pay off the mortgage on the old site and the balance is set aside for use in acquiring a new site and the construction of the facility. The SPCA is currently having plans for a new facility drawn and the City and County staff will have an opportunity to review the documents to make sure that the ~~ needs of our community are being met. Later this year, the SPCA will begin its own fund raising efforts for the capital facility, wherein they plan to raise construction monies from the private sector. The local governments who participate in the use of the facilities will be given an operating contract such as the document referenced above. At this time, it appears that the City of Roanoke, Town of Vinton, Roanoke County and Botetourt County will be the local governments participating at the new facility. ALTERNATIVES AND IMPACT: Alternative 1: Authorize the County Administrator to execute the above referenced operating contract on a form and conditions approved by the County Attorney. The effective date of this contract would be April 1, 1990. No new appropriation would be required for the balance of the current fiscal year, and monies are included in the 1990-91 fiscal year budget to cover the cost of this contract revision. Alternative 2: Discontinue the use of the SPCA as the operators of the impoundment facility for the County and consider building our own facility or contracting with another operator. The County does not have a facility at the present time and the City of Salem facility cannot accommodate the additional volume of animals at this time. The scope of our current operating contract is one of "Joint Purchasing " with the City of Roanoke to allow one facility to handle the needs of the community. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the County of Roanoke award this contract as a "Sole Source" purchase under the provisions of section 17-40 of the Roanoke County Code and that the County Administrator be authorized to execute the above referenced contract on a form and conditions approved by the County Attorney. The effective date of this contract would be April 1, 1990. No new appropriation of monies is required for the current fiscal year and monies are included in the 1990-91 fiscal year budget to cover the cost of this contract revision. Respectfully submitted, Appr~d by,, /~ .:r Yet s/ A~t~ .~ 'John M. Chambl ss, Jr. Elmer C. Hodge Assistant Administrator County Administrator --------------------- -------------------- -- ACTION VOTE Motion by• Harry C. Nickens to No Yes Abs Approved (X) Eddy x Denied ( ) approve~sta recommen a ion x Johnson Received ( ) McGraw x Referred ( ) Nickens x To ( ) Robers x cc: File h bliss Assistant County Administrator John C am Paul Mahoney, County Attorney Ken Hogan, Animal Control Reta Busher, Director, Budget Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance ACT ION # A- 4 2 4 9~'0~- 5 ITEM NUMBER +~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE MEETING DATE: April 24, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: Acceptance of Federal Grant Funds COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER Special Education Preschool ~,~ " off'' ., ,~-e-c -»-~-,~,~-n.z 0 ~~w~~. BACKGROUND: The Roanok eral ntovercnment Bo The funds would begused of $25,029 from the fed g for materials, equipment, and summer school instruction for the preschool program. Dr' Count KSchoo D Sy tem, willu be presentnto Services for the Roanoke Y answer any questions related to this program. The amount of $3,554 was originally budgeted in the Federal Programs Fund in anticipation of this grant, however, $25,029 was actually awarded, therefore, the County will only need to appropriate the remaining balance of $21,475. FISCAL IMPACT: If this grant is accepted, the Countovernmentcand an additional $21,475 in revenues from the federal g a related expenditure of ohmatchi g requireme t from the Countyl Programs Fund. There is n STAFF RECOMMENDATION~tionf reschoolnprogr m ting the federal grant for the special educa p ~~ ~~ ~.~~ ~ - 6 Reta R. Busher Elmer C. Hodge Director of Management County Administrator and Budget -------------- ---------------- ------------------------------- VOTE ACTION No Yes Abs Approved (x) Motion by: Harry C. Nickens to approve staff recommendatiorEddy x Denied ( ) Johnson x Received ( ) McGraw x Referred ( ) Nickens x To Robers x cc: Fi e Reta Busher, Director, Management & Budget Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance Dr. Bayes Wilson, Superintendent, Roanoke County Schools Dr. Eddie Kolb, Director, Pupil Personnel Services ~_3 FROM THE MINUTES OF THE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD OF ROANOKE COU1990 VIRGINI BOARD ROOM OF THE ASCHOOLIADMINI TRATION B ILDING12SALEM, IN THE VIRGINIA. RESOLUTION REQUESTING AN APPROPRIATION TO THE FEDERAL PROGRAMS FUND FOR THE SCHOOL YEAR 1989-90 PRESCHOOL ALLOCATIONS WHEREAS, notification was received on March 22, 1990 regarding the award of federal special education preschool allocation funds for the period July 1, 1989 through September 30, 1990, and WHEREAS, Roanoke County Schools' allocation is $25,029 of which $3,554 was budgeted for the 1989-90 school year; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the County School Board of Roanoke County, on motion of Charlsie S. Pafford and duly seconded, that an appropriation of $21,475 is being requested to the Federal Programs Fund. for materials, equipment, and summer school instruction for the preschool program. Adopted on the following recorded vote: AYES: Paul G. Black, Maurice L. Mitchell, Charlsie S. Pafford, Barbara B. Chewning, Frank E. Thomas NAYS: None TESTE; ~~ ~ , Clerk c: Mrs. Diane Hyatt ACTION NO. A-42490-6 ITEM NUMBER ~"~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: April 24, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: Request from Roanoke Area Soap Box Derby, Inc. to construct a Soap Box Derby Track at Walrond Park COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR' S COMMENTS : `,~ ~"~-c7'/--`~ ~ ~r ,~ ~-,---o ~ `~"~c~,C~r-c .,-~ ~c.,r~-fit BACKGROUND' At the April 10 meeting of the Board of Supervisors, a proposal to allow the Roanoke Area Soap Box Derby, Inc. to construct a Soap Box Derby Track at Walrond Park was delayed for two weeks. Some concern had been expressed about the amount of parking available, the coordination of the park use, (particularly if youth baseball and the Soap Box Derby activities were to occur at the same time), and whether or not other sites had been considered. As with any other facility, schedules must be coordinated to minimize conflict and staff does not deem this to be an insurmountable problem. Approximately eight acres of land was purchased with 1985 Bond monies for expanded parking and the future development of ball fields at Walrond Park. This space can be used for overflow parking and allow multiple use of the park facility. The Soap Box Derby group has visited and considered other sites in the County including Green Hill Park, but the amount of excavation and modification of the existing topography to meet the needs of the track were felt to be more extensive and less cost effective. Also, at Green Hill Park, the most suitable area would be adjacent to the Equestrian Center and would conflict with the nature of the operations planned for that site. The proposed site at Walrond Park is on an unused grassy area of the park near the administration building which is not scheduled for any special use on our long range plans. Steve Carpenter, Director of Parks & Recreation for the County, has been working closely with Wes Crow, representing the Roanoke Area Soap Box Derby Inc., to find a suitable location for the construction of a new soap box derby track in the Roanoke Valley area. The soap box derby is currently utilizing the old Starkey drag strip, located off of Buck Mountain Road, southwest Roanoke County, however this track is rough and in need of repair due to the effects of extreme weather and age. Due to the ~-`~ condition of the track, it may soon be necessary to resort to the use of a public street, however this is not the safest nor most desirable condition for this type of event. The proposed track would be 1,000 ft. long (including a 200 ft. run out area) and would consist of two racing lanes and also a return road for vehicular traffic to transport the racers back to the starting area. The attached map shows the concept plan for utilizing the Walrond Park facility. If granted the use of the Walrond Park land, the Roanoke Soap Box Derby Board would proceed to obtain private donations of money and services necessary to plan, design and build the track. When not being used for derby activities, the facility could be used for remote control airplanes, uphill foot and bicycle races etc., which would be an additional opportunity for this County owned public park facility. Soap Box Derby activities are open to boys and girls, ages 9 through 16, and include a dual control division designed for a handicapped driver with a co-driver. This summer's events will be a part of the Virginia State Games, and competition will also lead to championship races to be held in Akron, Ohio. Based on current participation and anticipated interest in an expanded facility, this type of operation could make a significant impact on our tourist and visitor trade. Six rallies are being planned with an anticipated participation of 35 contestants each. The R. G. Canning event should draw 200 contestants and their families from throughout the region. The R. G. Canning event will be a six day event and many people from outside the immediate area will be needing overnight accommodations, meals, etc. contributing up to $100,000 to our local economy. It is felt that a permanent home facility would allow the Soap Box Derby to continue to grow and become another example of our community's interest in our young people. ALTERNATIVES AND IMPACT: Alternative l: Authorize the Roanoke Area Soapbox Derby, Inc. to use the designated area at Walrond Park and proceed with the collection of private monies and services for the planning, design, and construction of the track facility. The facility would be owned by the County of Roanoke and the Soapbox Derby group would assist in the operation of the facility for competitions. No County monies are being requested for this venture. If approved, we would ask the County Attorney's office to prepare the appropriate documents to protect the County's interest and would outline the engineering and other approval processes necessary to allow construction. Alternative 2: Do not allow the use of the Walrond Park facility, but allow the County staff to continue to work with the Soapbox ~'`~ Derby group to find another suitable site within the community. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors approve Alternative 1, which authorizes the use of this portion of Walrond Park and that the appropriate legal documents be drafted by the County Attorney to protect the County's interest. Steve Carpenter and I will be present at the Board meeting to answer questions that you may have concerning this matter. Respectfully submitted, Approv d by ~' ~~~ ~'~ ohn M. Chambl ss, Jr. Elmer C. Hodge Assistant Administrator County Administrator ------------------------------ Approved (X) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) Attachment ACTION Motion by: Bob L. Johnson to a prove staf recommen a ion VOTE No YeX Abs Eddy ~ Johnson ~ McGraw _~ Nickens ~ Robers cc: File John Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator Steve Carpenter, Director, Parks & Recreation Paul Mahoney, County Attorney J • ~ • • s~.M ~•~o' nw ~ s~ res .. _ _ - i ~ Z~~ Lo'S ~~ 1 _ .s ., .` ,~ ~ _ ~ ~ ~ `~` ~ i / ~v~tou ~oard.r~lk _.~ ' ~. . ~ I t` ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~, '' -' _r i l' ~ = ~ i ~ - i - ter. ~' ~ i ~ ~ - ~ /#/ _ ~ ~ i / ' . ~ ~ ` 1 _ ' , ~ ~-~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ t /~ ter- ~~' ' ~ ti -•~ , ~~1 ~ ~~ ~ ~ 1 1 ~ i A \ "` ~ ~ ~ i 1 ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ .~i j~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ • ~ . ~ /~i~ /ice 1 ~ ~ i / t`~ ~~~ r ~~ ~~ ~ . ~ _ __ ~ _~~rr~ ~ ~ `~ ~ W~ r• ~~ ~~ ~ ~~ 'mss' \ ~ ` ` ` 1 ` , ' ` . '~.! • • ``` • • 1 /~ v 1 -- _ _ .~ •i \ • 1 ,, ACTION # A-42490-7 ITEM NUMBER ~ ~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: April 24, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: Request from Strauss Construction for 100 reimbursement of the cost of off-site water facilities constructed for the Proposed Cotton Hills Subdivision COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: r1 J+(n BACKGROUND' Strauss Construction Corporation has submitted a preliminary plan to develop a 120 lot single family subdivision along Cotton Hill between Back Creek and the Blue Ridge Parkway. Strauss Construction originally proposed to establish a new water system under the proviments lanttin order to prow de water and ssani ary wastewater treat P sewer service to this development. During preliminary discussions between the developer and County staff, it was recommended by staff that the developer extend existing water facilities instead of umststation with discharge connected system; and to use a sewage p p into the existing gravity sewer instead of using a wastewater treatment plant or on-lot septic systems. The coststat on ewould the existing water system and using a sewer pump result in lower construction and operating costs than the original proposal. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Strauss Construction is continuing for the Cotton Hill Subdivision which existing County water system and the us as recommended by County staff. the plan approval includes extension of a sewage pump process of the station ~- 5 SUNIl~IARY OF INFORMATION (continued) Public water would be supplied to the Cotton Hill Subdivision by extending the water main from South Roselawn/BridlewThe cost of the proposed subdivision as shown on the attached map. this construction will exceed the amount the Utility Director is authorized to credit against the developers water off-site facility fees. Strauss Construction has requested that the Board of Supervisors authorize the credit of the second half of the water off-site facility fee as provided for in the water ordinance so they can recover all of the eligible cost of the off-site water extension required. ALTERNATIVES AND IMPACTS: Alternative 1. The Board of Supervisors authorize the credit of the second half of the water off-site facility fee due for the Cotton Hill Subdivision, so developer's cost of off-site facility construction can be recovered. IMPACT OF ALTERNATIVE 1: The developer's cost to provide public water to this site will not exceed $1,036 per lot. The County will not expend current funds since this would be a credit of future fees due. The County would gain the approximate 2,200 feet of 12" water line along South Roselawn Roin Count n water systems of Brookwood and Scenic between the exist g Y Hills. Alternative 2 econdehalf of theuoff-s to fac 1 ty fee dueofrom the credit of the s the Cotton Hill Subdivision. IMPACT OF ALTERNATIVE 2: The developer's cost to provide public water to this site would exceed $1,036 per lot. The County would receive an additional $25,000 to $40,000 in off-site facility fees from this development. If this alternative was not acceptable to the developer, they could elect to construct a new water system to serve their development. The water ordinance provides that the County would pay for the storage facility as well as credit the fees against the cost of wells constructed as a supply. If the developer chose this option, the cost to the County would be the credit of all fees plus an estimated $50,000 additional to cover the above costs. 2 .~' STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors authorize the Utility Director to use the second half of the water off-site facility fee for Cotton Hill Subdivision as a credit for off-site water facilities constructed as provided for by the County Water Ordinance. SUBMITTED BY: n Clifford 'g, P.E. Utility Director ACTION Approved (x ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by: Richard W Robers to approve staff recommendat~~hnson McGraw Nickens Robers cc: File Cliff Craig, Director, Utilities Phillip Henry, Director, Engineering John Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator Reta Busher, Director, Management & Budget Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance APPROVED: if ...~ "~j--c~ „~,c Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator VOTE No Yes ~_ -x ~_ _Y_ ~~ Abs 3 cnn +'+'w ..n LR ~. •.. FpREST i 4 S8 ~ / $ .qH ~ ~~ ~r ~E~ _.NE ~J ~ ~ ~; ~ ~ F `°. ~ .~ -~. ~ 7n ; ~ \ hr O' FOIST , ~~g~ SsxM 1 ` i G~/`y`G • r1J00 _~ / . VICINTT'Y MAP ~ ~. `.~r.~ _-___ ... - ~ ~~. ~~ U ` - .• ~~u~ ~ APR 1990 ~%~ ~ " CONSTRUCTION ~`~ RECEIVED !'~ ROANOKE COUNTY ~~ , UTILITY DEPT. ti April 4, 1990 Mr. Clifford Craig, P.E. Utility Director County of Roanoke 1206 Kessler Mill Road Salem, VA 24153 RE: Cotton Hill Road -Sewer and ~~later Dear Cliff: Strauss Construction Corporation is undertaking a feasibility study of the acreage on Cotton Hill Road between Back Creek and the Blue Ridge Parkway. You have a preliminary plan on file with our rough layout. At this time, per our conversations, we are making formal requests for credit on water fees and reimbursements for sewer, The request for water fee credits is to credit 100°0 of fees in lieu of 50% per policy. The request for sewer fee reimbursement is to reimburse 100% of fees by Strauss Construction Corporation and to credit 75% of all other connections to this line by others. This reimbursement agreement would run for a period of ten (10) years. If this agrees with our discussion, please take appropriate steps to implement the above request. It is my understanding this will go before the Board on April 24th. Very truly yours, .~.~- .~'~%''~ Steven S. Strauss, President SSS/sch POST OFFICE BOX 20287 5100 BERNARD DRIVE SW ROANOKE VIRGINIA 24018 703/989-7060 BUILDERS/DEVELOPERS S ACTION # A-42490-8 ITEM NUMBER ~-(~ AT A REGULAR MEELDNAT THEHROANOKE COUNTYEADMINISTRATION CENTER COUNTY, VIRGINIA H MEETING DATE: April 24, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: Request from Strauss Construction for 100 reimbursement of the cost of off-site sewer facilities constructed for the Proposed Cotton Hills Subdivision COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ((1 // ~' BACKGROUND' Strauss Construction Corporation has submitted preliminary plan to develop a 120 lot single family subdivision alongStrauss Hill between Back Creek and the Blue Ridge Parkway. Construction originally proposed to establish a new water system under the provisions lanttin ordert to prow de water and ssan t ry wastewater treatmen p sewer service to this development. During preliminary discussions between the developer and County staff, it was recommended by staff that the developer extend existing water facilities instead of uTeststationnwith discharge connected system; and to use a sewage p p into the existing gravity sewer instead of using a wastewater treatment plant or on-lot septic systems. The coststation ewould the existing water system and using a sewer pump result in lower construction and operating costs than the original proposal. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Strauss Construction is continuing the plan approval process for the Cotton Hill Subdivision which includes exten uimn station existing County water system and the use of a sewage p p as recommended by County staff. -~ SUMMARY OF INFORMATION (continue: Sanitary Sewer Service will be provided by constructing a sewer pump station and force main with discharge into the estation County sewer system at Crystal Creek Drive. Travit um sewer is would be abandoned in the future when a g Back Creek to constructed from the Starkey Pump Station, along serve the Rt. 221 South areo~s authorizeCthetreimbursementeofe100~ that the Board of Supervis of the sanitary sewer fees for the Cotton Hill Subdivision anthese of the future sewer connection fees of others eriod of 10 facilities. The reimbursement is requested for a p years or until full reimbursement for the off-site sewer-has been received. ALTERNATIVES AND IMPACTS: Alternative 1. The Board of Supervisors would authorize the credit of 100$ of the sa cost of the off Ssite sewer facilities with and share the remaining the developer on an e~eltotalsoff site sewer costrismestimat d to fees would be made. Th be $110,000. IMPACT OF ALTERNATIVE 1. This alternative would cost the County up to $25,000 in payments to the developer. This alternative would not require the adrsniandatwouldf note1prohibitnttherecreditovor the next 10 yea use these reimbursement of fees to future developers that may facilities. This alternative will promote growth in the area. Alternative 2. The Board of Supervisors would authorize the credit of 100$ of the ofen~i~o the developerooft75~ of the offl Subdivision and reimbursem site sewer fees paid by others that use these facilities. IMPACT OF ALTERNATIVE 2. The developer will have $50,000 of excess cost to provide public The County would not expendmfundscatethis future reimbursement. time but would adnninist ent of future feesn of othersnserved by this of 10 years. Reimbursem system prohibits the use of those fees to credit or reimburse others when they provide off-site sewer facilities. This alternative will promote growth in the area. Alternative 3. The Board of Supervisors would authorize the credit of 100 or lesot authorize any further reimbursement to the Hill Subdivision and n developer for these facilities. 2 -~ IMPACT OF ALTERNATIVE 3. The developer will have from $50,000 to $110,000 of excess cost to provide public sewer to the site•ro ecte would not be any expenditure of County funds for this p j This alterative may encourage the developer to use on-lot septic systems to serve the site with a lower density of lots. This lower density of lots would likely make extension of public water to the site not feasible and resul use ofd nllotl septict and on-lot swells adjacent development. The for past development has when dthose h fa it ties b fail and rpublic owners and the County facilities are required. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends alternative one in order to promote quality development that provides public sanitary sewer service at a reasonable cost. SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED: Cliffor r ig, P.E. Utility Director Approved (x) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to ~yru.s Elmer C. Hodge ` County Administrator ACTION VOTE Motion by: Harr. Nickens No to approve staff recommendat~~dnson - McGraw Nickens Robers cc: File Cliff Craig, Director, Utilities Phillip Henry, Director, Engineering John Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator Reta Busher, Director, Management & Budget Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance Yes x x x x x Abs CONSTRUCTION April 4, 1990 Mr. Clifford Craig, P.E. Utility Director County of Roanoke 1206 Kessler Mill Road Salem, VA 24153 RE: Cotton Hill Road - Sewer and ~~Jater Dear Cliff: ~ 7n 1~ r~ ~~ - ~ ~ ~ ,. ~- _ .. `r' /' ~= l ~ APR 1990 RECEIVED '~ ROANOKE COUNTY ~~ ~ UTILITY DEPT. Strauss Construction Corporation is undertaking a feasibility study of the acreage on Cotton Hill Road between Back Creek and the Blue Ridge Parkway. You have a preliminary plan on file with our rough layout. At this time, per our conversations, we are making formal requests for credit on water fees and reimbursements for sewer, The request for water fee credits is to credit 100°0 of fees in lieu of 50% per policy. The request for sewer fee reimbursement is to reimburse 100% of fees by Strauss Construction Corporation and to credit 75% of all other connections to this line by others. This reimbursement agreement would run for a period of ten (10) years. If this agrees with our discussion, please take appropriate steps to implement the above request. It is my understanding this will go before the Board on April 24th. Very truly yours, Steven S. Strauss, President SSS/sch POST OFFICE BOX 20287 5100 BERNARD DRIVE SW ROANOKE VIRGINIA 24018 703/989-7060 BUILDERS/DEVELOPERS 5 ACTION NO. p,-42490-9 ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OFE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRAT ONRCENTER COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT TH MEETING DATE: April 24, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: Request from the Toourtfadjacenttto theoVinton War use of the tennis Memorial and a el WarhMemorial use it for additiona parking for th COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~-c:ti ~~~~ ~~ ~ Yn BACKGROUND• The Town of Vinton hasfa eq itst be turnedtover to thecTown adjacent to the War Memorial Y arking of Vinton for the purpose of converting it into additional p for the War Memorial. These tennis courts are seldom usrodxamately in need of immediate major repair, `^Th la inou needs of the area can $30,000. It is felt that the tennis p y g be adequately met through the tennis courts located at Gearhart and Stonebridge Parks. This facility is currently ° Counby'shD Pa tment lofo Pa ks 1& operated and maintained by the Y Recreation through a lease dated May 3, 1982. Section 7 of that lease agreement requires the County to notify the Town Manager of any intention to eliminate the lease or to ceae~ission efor the buildings (facilities). We hereby request p County Administrator to advise the facil ty and tthereby return it willing to discontinue use of th arking to the control of the Town for use as an additional p facility. ALTERNATIVES AND IMPACT: Alternative # 1: Authori t the CCountyA o 1 Roanoke r noo longer the Vinton Town Manager tha thereby chooses to operate of a Vinton is 1 requesta toe convertu its use to honoring the Town additional parking for the Vinton War Memorial facility. Alternative #2: Retain th ment ewill be required in the near understanding that major improve future at a cost of approximately $30,000. ~-~ RECOMMENDATION• Staff recommends that the County Adnninis Roanoke'sa ntentzto to notify the Town Manager of the County of cease operations at the tennis court adjacent to th the Town Wof Memorial, effective May 1, 1990, thereby allowing arkin Vinton to utilize and maintain said facility as additional p g for the Vinton War Memorial. Approved by, Respectfully submitted, ~y,~~ ~_t ~- ~ Elmer C. Hodge ohn M. Chambli s, Jr. County Administrator Assistant Administrator _________-- ---------- ----------_------------------- VOTE ------------ ACTION No Yes Abs Approved (x) Motion by. Harry C.Nickens to ~_ Denied ( ) a rove staff recommendation Johnson ~_ Received ( ) McGraw ~- Referred ( ) Nickens ~ To ( ) Robers ~- cc: Steve Carpenter, Director, Parks & Recreation Jim Jones, Assistant Director, Parks & Recreation File John Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator Paul Mahoney, County Attorney ~~ ~j, E M O R A N D U M TO: John Chambliss, Jr., of sHumantSe~vicesAdministrator FROM: Stephen Carpen DATE: March 5, 1990 SUBJECT: Vinton Tennis Courts Please note the attached -letter from George W. Nester, Vinton Town Manager. I concur with Mr. Nester's request and observations. The existing tennis courts are seldom used and are in immedia000need for maioJ: repair at a cost of approximately $30,000 - $35, The tennis playing needs of the area, it is felt, can be adquately met through the other courts located at both Gearhart and Stonebridge Parks. Recommendation: Approve Mr. Nester's request with the understanding that all associated arrangements and costs will be borne solely by the Town of Vinton. Please let me know what action you would like us to take from this point. R Thank you. Jim Jones Darrell Shell Attachment (1) TOWN OF VINTON P. O. BOX 338 VINTON. VIRGINIA 24179 GEORGE W. NESTER TOWN MANAGER (703) 983-0607 FAX (703 983-0621 February 26, 1990 ~D Mr. James E. Jones County of Roanoke Assistant Director of Parks 1206 Kessler Mill Road Salem, VA 24153 Dear Jim: ~~." The Town of Vinton is interested in the use of the present tennis courts at the Vinton War Nlerrtiorial for the purpose of converting them into additional parking at the War Memorial facility. The purpose of this letter is to de- termine if the County Department of Parks and Recreation has any plans that would conflict with the conversion of these tennis courts into public parking. From my periodic observation, it appears that the courts are used infrequently and that the loss of these tennis courts should pose limited problems to the overall County recreation, program. It also appears to be a continuing mainten- ance drain on the County to keep these courts up. If you are in agreement that this tennis court might be taken wer for conver- sion to public Barking for the War Memorial grounds, I would appreciate you advising. Should you have questions or need additional information, do not hesitate to contact me. We would anticipate beginning conversion of this parking area in July ofa this year. I appreciate your response to this question. Sincerely, George W. Nester Town Manager GWN/cr ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER ~- AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: April 24, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: Request for a Work Session on June 12, 1990 regarding the Spring Hollow Reservoir. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION On April 12, 1990, John Hubbard, Diane Hyatt and I met with our consultants, Hayes, Seay, Mattern and Mattern and Wheat First Secretaries regarding the Spring Hollow Reservoir. At that meeting we presented the latest architectural and engineering information and cost estimates including the distribution system and treatment plant from the consultants and asked that Wheat First Securities develop a financial plan for this project. They indicated it will take sixty days to accomplish this plan, and to prepare an analysis for presentation to the board members. They have requested that the information be presented to the Board at a work session on June 12, 1990 They also advised me that it would be necessary to conduct a rate study before going to the bond market. Further information will be presented by Wheat First Securities on this aspect when the presentation is made to the Board. They recommended that the financial plan be finalized with the bond rating agencies prior to going forward with construction bids because this will result in more realistic bids to the County. RECOMMENDATION' Staff recommends that a work session on the Spring Hollow Reservoir be set for June 12, 1990. E-~ Approy~d by, Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator -------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Eddy Received ( ) Johnson Referred ( ) McGraw To ( ) Nickens Robers 1 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. ~~ ~ - ~'"' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: April 24, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: Request for Public Hearing and First Reading for Rezoning Ordinances Consent Agenda COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND' The first reading on these ordinances is accomplished by adoption of these ordinances in the manner of rovalnof the substan- The adoption of these items does not imply app tive content of the requested zoning actions, rather approval satisfies the procedural requirements of the County Charter and schedules the required public hearings and second readings of these ordinances. The second readings and public hearings on these ordinances is scheduled for May 22, 1990. The titles of these ordinances are as follows: 1. An ordinance to modify the Future Land Use Plan designation of a 2.56 acre parcel from Development to Transition, and to rezone said property from R-1 to B- 2 for the purposes of constructing a convenience store with gas pumps, located on Hardy Road approximately .4 miles northwest of Feather Road (SR 654) in the Vinton Magisterial District, upon the petition of Henry J. Brabham, IV. 2. An ordinance to rezone a 2.25 acre parcel from B-2 Conditional to B-2 Conditional (Amendment of Proffers) for the purposes of constructing a retail drive-through window located at 4515 Brambleton Avenue in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District, upon the petition of Springwood Associates. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends as follows: (1) That the Board approve and adopt the first reading of ~ /- ~ 2 these rezoning ordinances for the purpose of scheduling the second readings and public hearings for May 22, 1990. (2) That this section of the agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth as Items 1-2 and that the Clerk is authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this action. Respectfully submitted, ~~ r~ ~1 Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney Action Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by Eddy Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers Vote No Yes Abs /,% 3a / Date Rec .: ~ ~a, ~ Received By: ~.«t Case No.: ~~~-` Ord. No.: ROANOKE COUNTY REZONING APPLICATION 1. Owner' s Name : l~faynard E Holdren Phone :(703) 343-0596 Address: 840 Hardy Road, Apartment 10, Vinton, Virginia 24179 2 . Applicant' s Name : Henr y J Brabhan, IV _ Phone :(703) 345-6267 Address: P.O. Boa 218, Vinton, Vir inia 24179 3. Location of Property: Hardy Road, Vinton, Virginia Tax Map Number (s) : 71.07-4 4. Magisterial District: Vinton 5. Size of Property: 2.56 acres 6. Existing Zoning: R-1 Existing Land Use: Vacant 7. Proposed Zoning: B-2 Proposed Land Use: Convenience store with gas pumps 8. Comprehensive Plan Designation: Development _ 9. Are Conditions Proffered With This Request? Yes ~ No (If you are voluntarily offering proffers as a part of your applica- tion, these proffers must be in writing. A member of the Planning Staff can assist you in the preparation of these proffers.) 10. Value of Land and (Proposed) Buildings: ;200,000.00 11. The Following Items Must Be Submitted With This Application. Please Check If Enclosed. Application Will Not Be Accepted If Any Of These Items Are Missing Or Incomplete: % Letter of Application % Concept Plan % Metes and Bounds Description % List of Adjacent Owners of Property (Attach Exhibit A) % Vicinity Map % Application Fee % Written Proffers Water and Sewer Application (If Applicable) 12. Signature Of Property Owner, Contract Purchaser, Or Owner's Agent: Signature ~ Date aa~9e Mailing Address P. O. Box 246 Vinton. Virginia 24179 Thank you for your assistance in this matter. ry Truly Yours, g M~ ayer, on behalf f Henry J. Brabha , LAW OFFICE BRUCE E. MAYER ATTORNEY AT U1W 1106 E. Washington Avenue Suite A Vinton, Virginia 24179 ~a ~ -/ ~~ a3 Telephone I~(~ •~' ; ~ (703) 342.3787 • ~ Telecopier Number . „ ~ (703) 985.0511 March 23, 1990 , • ~i .~ Roanoke County Planning Commission P. O. Box 29800 _ .... Roanoke, Virginia 24018 Re• Rezoning Application of Henry J. Brabham, IV Dear Sir: Please find enclosed the rezoning application package for a 2.56 acre tract of land located on Hardy Road in the Vinton Magisterial District of Roanoke County to be rezoned from R-1 to B-2. The purpose of this rezoning is to allow the prospective purchaser who owns an adjacent convenience mart with gas service, to construct a new modern convenience store with a gas facility on the 2.56 acre tract. The adjacent tract which is already zoned B- 2 will be used for different B-2 commercial uses so as not to conflict with the new business. The existing location is too small for exspansion into a modern convenience center. A copy of the plat of the adjacent property is attached. Hardy Road has become a major traffic artery and with the upcoming Explore Project it is felt by the applicant that good business would dictate a new modern convenience store with gas be provided on Hardy Road. There are approximately 11,000 cars a day that travel Hardy Road and this volume is increasing all the time. There is no convenience store/gas station on Hardy Road except for a 7 Eleven store in the vicinity of Hardy Road Elementary School, and that is located on the opposite side of the road approximately 1/2 mile away. The comprehensive plan shows that this is a development area and the petitioner has proferred conditions to the rezoning namely that he will not develop any other B-2 uses on this tract except for a convenience store with gas pumps. ." / PROFFER OF CONDITIONS for Request of Rezoning From R1 to B2 2.565 acre tract of land located on Hardy Road. 1. All uses contained in the B2 General Commercial District of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance will not be requested, but only the use for the construction of a convenience store with gas service. All other uses found under the B2 zone are not being sought. H my Brabham, IV by his attorney, Bru G, - / r .. 5 .~Nf~ _ `/~:r„y -~I1 .~ ~_~ ., z ~~ T ~' fi ~~r ~_. ,, r,.. ~~ 7~ ~ `! 3 0 ~ ~9~~x ;~.o~, ~~ Ei~N~ 1 i0~ ~~Q ~~ (~ ~'~~ Q w .~~{~~9 ~~~ !~ c 516 r- ' , i b ~ M S' ~..~,,._ ~o ,, , ~ s ,. ~~-83 ...,...4~~......,~„ IAN S U1ND ~.~ ~- ,~ ~ ---... --~- -_.___._.rt f.„ . M ~~ ,, ~.. ~r, ~ ~ , 0=,°Q "i ~3; U O~ Vl p ~ Q a ¢ ~ O Z -- - F- a m O I_ --- ~~ ~ i *; ~~ ; . ~ ~~ ~ _ n.. ..~ ~. `?I ~.e ~~'Y iti .. ~ 0 ~ v .~ ~ ~~r V K~~: W F- ~3 F_~ U u. O 2 m ac t- O C7 t- ~~1 U J J ~ W UNa Z O m U J J 4 ~ W u~'f f ~ UZ~ .': O Q m ~~ u ~ ,® I 1 S ----- ~ - / W F- ~=°a ~. 3 UO~u W ~ \~ ~~ C7 m F- ac ~ U .~ o F ac - WW Q=Z ~~ O 3 V ~ C v/ a r~ W JQ ^ ~ifc H ~=W X30 Una ~ ~~ O~ a ^~ .:~ t, .'~..' sf ~' d. ~~. w;y; j:i Mf ,, G -/ ~~ •. r C r~ _. t ~~ ~ ` r "'"* Cam: ~. . _ l -._~~.,1. _.... ~~ I4;= J O I Q ROANOKE COUNTY REZONING APPLICATION 1. Owner's Name: Springwood Associates Yes Address: Suite 200 3214 Electric Road, Roanoke, Virginia 24018 ~ S rin wood Associates Phone: 114-6500 2. Applicant s Name: p 9 Address :Suite 200 3214 El ectri c Road, Roanoke, V i rgi n i a 24018 3. Location of Property: 4515 Brambleton Avenue Roanoke, Virginia 24018 Tax Map Number(s) :86.08-04-t~7 & 08 4. Magisterial District: Ca~1~9 5. Size of Property: 2.25 6. Existing Zoning: 6~2c ~!l:~sot ~/ls Existing Land Use• Office and Retail . Proposed Zoning: B-2c with modification of proffered conditions Proposed Land Use : Office and Retai 1 with a drive-thru window 8. Comprehensive Plan Designation: Transition 9. Are Conditions Proffered With This Request? Phone: 774-6500 X No (If you are voluntarily offering proffers as a part of your applica- tion, these proffers must be in writing. A member of the Planning Staff can assist you in the preparation of these proffers.) 10. Value of Land and (Proposed) Buildings: $2,000,000.00 11. The Following Items MulicationWill Not1Be A d l AcaeptedlIf AnynOfPThese pp . ose Check If Enc Items Are Missing Or Incommplete: x Letter of Application d Bounds Description x x Concept Plan List of Ad acent Owners x Metes an of Property (Attach Exhibit A) ~-. - f P x Application Fee ers written rof x Water and Sewer Application If A licable ~ PP ~ '^. Signature Of Property Owner, Contract Purchaser, t : n Or Owner's Age - ~ - ~ ,, ~ - ~~~~ ~ ~~' Signature Date February 21, 1990 ~, Date Rec. s_a 40 " ~~ Received By: , ~ Case No.s Ord. No.s G-~- ~~ ~~~ ~~~~~ Woons~ $OC}E88 & HAZLEdROVB Ioa FRANELIN Rowa, 3.W. P.O. Box 720 ROANOHE, VIRGINIA 24004-0720 TELEX 392915 7ELECOPI[R X03 962-4216 TELEPHONE 703 992-4200 DIRECT DIAL NUMBER 982-4252 February 23, 1990 Mr. Terrance Harrington Director of Planning County of Roanoke -.• 1~~+~ l' . ~ ~~ :. - ,. Fop ,~ ?,q !e,~, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, SW Roanoke , VA 2 4 018 ~`~" r`~; ~ ~~~, . Re: Change of Proffered Conditions on Behalf of ~-~iT Springwood Associates, Roanoke County Tax Parcel Nos. 86.08-04-07 and 08 Dear Terry: Enclosed herewith please find Rezoning Application which we are filing on behalf of our above clients, together with the items specified in Paragraph 11 of the Application. As you know, these matters were discussed in a conference between you and Doug Freeman on February 21st. Please let me know if you have any questions or if you need anything further at this time. As always, I appreciate your help and cooperation. Your very truly, r~ Michael R. Smeltzer MRS/lgb Enclosure cc: Mr. Stephen D. Freeman (w/enc.) G_z VIRGINIA: PEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY A 2.25 acre parcel of land, ) generally located on the ) northerly side of Brambleton ) Avenue, SW, (U.S. Route 221) ) PROFFER OF within the Windsor Hills ) CONDITIONS Magisterial District, and ) recorded as Parcel #86.08-04- ) ~'7 and 08 in the Roanoke ) County Tax Records. ) TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY: In accordance with Section 15.1-491.1 et seq. of the Code of Virginia and Section 21-105E of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance, the Petitioner, Springwood Associates, a Virginia General Partnership, hereby voluntarily proffers to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, the following conditions t~ the rezoning of the above-referenced parcel of land: 1. The conditions previously proffered shall remain in full force and effect with the exception of the proffer of an amended Concept Plan as set forth in Paragraph 2 hereof. 2. The property would be developed in accordance with the Concept Plan made by Balzer and Associates, dated May 3, 1988, and Amendment thereto dated February 21, 1990, except for such changes as may be required by the site plan review. Respectfully submitted, SPRINGWO D ASSOCIATES By • ~2~( !~-. •M c ael R. Sme t er, Attorney for Petition uw ~~~ ,,~~ aEns a -u-. ~vE -1- - ~. L . ~~ ~'" ~ N 3 ~= e • ! ~ ,, ~~x~ - , ~. ~y~ M ' ~4• +~ ~ ~. ~ ~r?o ~j0%~~ g\ s Y~~,~ ~ O _= ~ (~ ~ ~~~5 106 • I 1' a ~"• ~ ~ I Ilj ~ I ~'~ z ~t,~"-. ~ I III . i C~ ~ ~a~~ ~ j I ~ ~~ yi W ~ ~ ~ ' y:ay ~ \~~ ~~ I ,{LJ I "r~ , ~ ` ~" II W VAC 1 ~ ~~~ ~ ~~ _~~ i ~ ~I ~~ ~_\ ~ I I ! ~ ~ . / ~ I \\ I ~ s ~ - ~ I ~ _ -- !~ 1 f 8 - 1 ~ _- 1 iy ~ _~ 1 }' ~- 1 4 • W y ~ I R L-- N- (-~ --~ J v ; II i ~- ~ ~ I ~ r 1 _~ W ~- ~ ~ i ~~~: ~ ~ ~_~ ~~ 3~ ~ ~ I I 3 ti 1 I \ _ Y~ Z~ ~ I ~.~, .'- I ~, ~ 1 M W I ~- ~ < 1 ~_ _•_ ~w "~ ~ w-~ ~ .~' ~ oYa ~ ~ ~ I .- J I -- .airv--.w.oufrO.iirr I .sra = -,KC,c.x.icn i _-- ~ I i I ~..~.is.r~w•rr+v ~ c IM'~JI11RrO~'rJ~ I I~1•MH A"~N N/ - /fit „~wav . rn ! rya rq~~aarv I ,-, -« ..w.w ''I r x~~o r u~ I ~ aw a+~ . s. } ACTION NUMBER ITEM NUMBER ~ / AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: April 24, 1990 SUBJECT: Appointments to Committees, Commissions and Boards COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: 1 Community Corrections Resources Board One-year term of Edmund J. Kielty, Alternate. His term expired August 13, 1988. One-year term of Bernard Hairston expired August 13, 1989. 2 League of Older Americans One-year term of Webb Johnson expired 3/31/90. 3 Landfill Citizens Advisory Committee Carl L. Wright, representative from the Cave Spring Magisterial District has resigned and another representative should be appointed. 4 Transportation and Safety Commission Four-year term of Lt. Delton R. Jessup, State Police Representative expired 4/1/90. SUBMITTED BY: Mary H.' Allen Clerk to the Board APPR ED B n .~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Eddy Received ( ) Johnson Referred ( ) McGraw To ( ) Nickens Robers f~. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, APRIL 24, 1990 RESOLUTION 42490-10 APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM J - CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. that the certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for April 24, 1990 designated as Item J - Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 4, inclusive, as follows: 1. Approval of Minutes - October 24, 1989, November 15, 1989, November 28, 1989, December 19, 1989. 2. Approval of Minutes - March 27, 1990. 3. Approval of Raffle Permit - Clearbrook Rescue Auxiliary. 4. Acknowledgement from the Virginia Department of Transportation of the acceptance of .14 miles of Winesap Drive (Route 1084) into the Secondary System. 2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this resolution. On motion of Supervisor Johnson with Item 1 removed for separate vote, and carried by the following voice vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None Item 1, on motion of Supervisor Nickens, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None ABSTAIN: Supervisor Eddy A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors CC: File Phillip Henry, Director of Engineering '~ l October 24, 1989 ~ ~ n Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Roanoke County Administration Center 3738 Brambleton Avenue, S.W. Roanoke, Virginia 24018 October 24, 1989 The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, met this day at the Roanoke County Administration Center, this being the second Tuesday, and the second regularly scheduled meeting of the month of October, 1989. ZN RE: CALL TO ORDER Chairman Garrett called the meeting to order at 3:05 p.m. The roll call was taken. Supervisor Nickens arrived at 3:07 p.m. MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Lee Garrett, Vice Chairman Richard Robers, Supervisors Bob L. Johnson, Steven A. McGraw, Harry C. Nickens MEMBERS ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator; John M. Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator for Human Services; John R. Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator of Community Services and Development; Don M. Myers, Assistant County Administrator for Management Services; Joseph Obenshain, Senior Assistant County Attorney; Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney; Brenda J. Holton, Deputy Clerk; October 24, 1989 2 ~ 2 Supervisor Johnson advised that the Hollins Community Project, a joint venture with Botetourt County, was awarded recognition along with the Source Separation Recycling Project. These two projects were also honored when Roanoke County received the All America City Award. IN RE: NEW BOSINE88 i. Request from the Planning Commission for an Interstate 81 Corridor Study. A-102489-1 Mr. Harrington presented a resolution from the Planning Commission supporting the funding and preparation of an I-81 Corridor Analysis and Plan. The Planning Commission felt that the I-81 Corridor is a vital transportation link for Roanoke County and a significant community resource. In order to maximize the potential of this resource, they recommended that a comprehensive analysis of this corridor should be undertaken. This evaluation will probably take a minimum of six months to complete. Supervisor McGraw advised that the Roanoke Valley Cooperation Committee met recently with other governments and the highway department and identified this as a needed project. He felt that this should be expanded to include other governments if they would like to participate, particularly Montgomery County. Supervisor McGraw moved that the request for funding be approved and to go forward asking other governments to participate. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Robers. October 24, 1989 ~ 1 4 12, 1989 ("Ordinance"), authorizing the issuance and sale of $1,115,000 General Obligation School Bonds, Series 1989, of the County of Roanoke, Virginia, ("Bonds") setting forth the form and details thereof and directing the County Administrator to accept the maturities and interest rates for the Bonds established by the Virginia Public School Authority; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: 1. The maturities and interest rates on the Bonds established by the County Administrator in the attached Certificate as to Interest Rates are hereby approved and ratified. 2. The Board determines that if it is in the best interests of the County to participate in the State Non-Arbitrage Program and to deposit the proceeds of the Bonds in the State Non-Arbitrage Program Pool I ("SNAP Pool I") pursuant to the Contract, dated as of January 16, 1989, creating the SNAP Pool I and such Contract is approved. The Treasurer and the County Administrator, or either of them, is each authorized to execute on behalf of the County such contracts and documents as may be necessary for such purpose. 3. This resolution shall take effect immediately. The undersigned Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia, hereby certifies that the foregoing constitutes a true and correct copy of a resolution duly adopted at a meeting of the Board of Supervisors duly called and held on October 24, 1989. On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor Nickens, and carried by the following recorded vote: October 24, 643 and I-81 in the from B-2 to M-1 for conditions upon the Supervisors of Roano: 1989 2 ~ 6 Catawba Magisterial District industrial development with application of the Board of ke County, Virginia. 5. An ordinance to amend the Future Land Use Plan map designation of approximately 25 acres located east of Carvins Cove Dam Road and immediately north of I-81 in the Catawba Magisterial District from Development to Principal Industrial. 6. An ordinance to change the zoning classification of approximately 125 acres of real estate located south of Routes 11 and 460, south and west of Barley Drive and the N&W railway in the Catawba Magisterial District from A-1MH to M-1 for industrial development with conditions upon the application of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. 7. An ordinance to issue a Use-Not-Provided-For Permit with conditions upon application of Gregory Pierce to operate a training/education center on approximately 72 acres of real estate located northwest of the intersection of Routes 637 and 631 in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District. IN RE: POBLIC HEARING AND SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance amending Sections 10-4 and 10-15 and adding Section 10-19, Chapter 10, Licenses of the Roanoke County Code. 0-102489-3 Senior Assistant County Attorney Joe Obenshain advised that during the extensive revision of the current Business License Ordinance adopted on November 22, 1988, no explicit provision was included establishing criminal liability for failure to apply for a business license or file a business license tax return. The staff recommends approval of these amendments to provide this October 24, 1989 ~ 1 p correct residence address; the nature of the business, profession, trade, or occupation to be pursued; the place where it is to be pursued; and a record of gross receipts verified by oath for the preceding twelve (12) months; as well as such other information as may be required by the commissioner of the revenue. The commissioner shall compute the amount of license tax and after payment shall issue the license, subject to zoning certification as provided in section 10-7. b) Tt shall be unlawful and a violation of this chapter for anv uerson to operate a business, urofession, trade. or occupation within the county without having first obtained a license in accordance with this section and before posting _such license as re fired b section 10-13. Such violations shall constitute a class 1 misdemeanor. c) It shall be unlawful and a violation of this chapter for any person to make false statements with intent to defraud in any application, return, or affidavit required by this chapter. Such violation shall constitute (i) a class 3 misdemeanor if the amount of the tax lawfully assessed in connection with the return is $1,000 or less, or (ii) a class 1 misdemeanor if the amount of the tax lawfully assessed in connection with the return in more than $1,000. Upon conviction under this section, the commissioner of the revenue shall revoke all licenses of the business for the balance of the tax year. d) Any person, firm. or corporation holding a license under this chapter to operate any business shall_ forfeit such license immediately upon conviction by anv court of competent jurisdiction in the Commonwealth of Virginia of a violation of (i) section 18 2-248 relatinq to an imitation controlled substance or iii) section 18 2-248 7 relating to money laundering. e) No license issued pursuant to this chapter shall be valid or effective unless and until the tax required shall be paid to the county treasurer and such payment shall be shown on the license. f) The commissioner of the revenue shall report monthly to the treasurer the aggregate amount of license taxes assessed during the month and placed in the hands of the treasurer for collection. State law reference - Code of Virginia Section 58.1-3916.1, 18.2- 248.6. Sec. 10-15. Certification of erroneous assessment; refunds when licensee ceases to do business. 220 October 24, 1989 to such indebtedness. e) Any person who has been properly issued a license may apply for a refund prior to the date upon which the license was to become effective by providing satisfactory evidence to the Commissioner of the Revenue that the business was never commenced or the sale, show, performance, or exhibition will not take place. Upon being satisfied that such license was never in effect, the Commissioner of the Revenue may authorize a refund of the license fee less a thirty dollar ($30) processing fee. State Law Reference - Code of Virginia Section 58.1-3980, 3981. 2. That Chapter 10, "Licenses," of the Roanoke County Code be, and hereby is, amended and reenacted by the addition of the following section to read and provide as follows: Sec. 10-18. Penalties. Any person who shall willfully fail or refuse to file a business license tax return as required by Section 10-4 shall be guilty of a violation of law Upon conviction for such failure, the person shall be punished as a Class 3 misdemeanor if the amount of the tax lawfully assessed in connection with the return is S1 000 or less and as a Class 1 misdemeanor if the amount of the tax lawfully assessed in connection with the return is more than 51,000. State Law Reference--Code of Virginia, Section 58.1-3916.1 and Section 58.1-3700. 3. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect on and after November 1, 1989. On motion of Supervisor Robers, seconded by Supervisor Nickens, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisor Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None 2. Ordinance amending Chapter 8, 'Erosion and Sedi- meet Control", of the Roanoke County Code by amending Section 8- 11 (a), "Control Measures Generally" to provide for the adoption October 24, 1989 2 2 Z At 3 : 30 p.m. , Supervisor Garrett moved to go into Executive Session pursuant to~the Code of Virginia Section 2.1-344. (a) to discuss a specific legal mater concerning Consolidation and the Town of Vinton and (b) sale of real estate. The motion was seconded by Supervisor McGraw and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None IN RE: OPEN SESSION Supervisor Garrett moved to return to Open Session at 4:15 p.m. The motion was seconded by Supervisor McGraw and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None RESOLOTION 102489-4 CERTIFYING ERECOTIVE MEETING WAS HELD IN CONFORMITY WITH THE CODE OF VIRGINIA WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia has convened an executive meeting on this date pursuant to an affirmative recorded vote and in accordance with the provisions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and WHEREAS, Section 2.1-344.1 of the Code of Virginia requires a certification by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke October 24, 1989 Atlantic and Pacific, Incorporated has agreed to purchase the ten acres for a total price of $230,000, and initiate engineering studies for the purpose of several companies locating at this site. For this sale to be complete and to satisfy all the clients' needs, a pending rezoning of a portion of this tract from B-2 to M-1 has been filed with the Planning Commission. Staff is recommending that this sale be approved and the proceeds used to develop Green Hill Park. Mr. Duncan introduced Mr. Keith Frazer, President, and Mr. Keith Hanabass, General Manager, of Atlantic and Pacific, Incorporated. Atlantic and Pacific has agreed that they will make available additional acreage to the anonymous company and will not seek a profit on this acreage. Supervisor McGraw moved to approve the prepared ordinance and that no impediments be offered to the other industry's ability to come into the same area. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Nickens. Supervisor Nickens asked for a legal clarification with regard to the wording on the recommended use of the proceeds and advised that proceeds from sale of property should be directed to a capital account. After discussion and opinion from County Attorney Paul Mahoney, Supervisor McGraw restated his motion to approve and amend ordinance, paragraph #4, so that all proceeds from the sale would go to a capital fund account with the intent being that the proceeds will improve Green Hill Park facilities, and that an October 24, 1989 2 2 6 property, the offer of Atlantic and Pacific Inc. for Twenty-three Thousand Dollars ($23,000) per acre to purchase 10 acres, more or less, for Two Hundred Thirty Thousand Dollars ($230,000) is hereby accepted and all other offers are rejected; and 4 . g' ~ , , ~ ~~.:.. .., r8 c~u3-iiv3R--~~~S~s i That all proceeds from the sale of this real estate are to be placed in the capital facility account; and 5. That the County Administrator is authorized to execute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County as are necessary to accomplish the conveyance of said property, all of which shall be upon form approved by the County Attorney. On motion of Supervisor McGraw as amended in Paragraph #4, seconded by Supervisor Robers, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisor Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None IN RE: APPOINTMENTS 1. Industrial Development Authority Supervisor Robers nominated Bill Branch for reappointment to the Industrial Development Authority for another four-year term. 2. Planning Commission Supervisor McGraw nominated Wayland Winstead for October 24, 1989 BUPERDISOR GARRETT: (1) Presented a letter received from Ron Leichtweis concerning sewer and drainage problems on Grandin Road Extension. Supervisor Garrett moved to include this area off Route 410 as a top priority since work is already underway in the area. Supervisor Robers offered a substitute motion to refer the matter to staff. The substitute motion was seconded by Supervisor Nickens and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens NAYS: Supervisor Garrett. Mr. Hodge was directed to bring this back to the Board at the November 15th meeting. IN RE: CONSENT AGENDA Supervisor Johnson moved that the Consent Agenda be approved. The motion was seconded by Supervisor McGraw and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisor Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None RESOLUTION NO. 102489-6 APPRODING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERDISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM L - CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke October 24, 1989 2 3 O 1. That this matter came this day to be heard upon the proceedings herein, and upon the application of Twin Mountain Circle from Twin Mountain Drive (Route 1097) in an easterly direction to the cul-de-sac to be accepted and made a part of the Secondary System of State Highways under Section 33.1-229 of the Virginia State Code. 2. That it appears to the Board that drainage easements and a fifty (50) foot right-of-way for said road have heretofore been dedicated by virtue of a certain map\maps known as Section 4 of Falling Creek Estates Subdivision which map was recorded in Plat Book 9, Page 119, of the records of the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, on October 13, 1978 and that by reason of the recordation of said map no report from a Board of Viewers, nor consent or donation of right-of-way from the abutting property owners is necessary. The Board hereby guarantees said right-of-way for drainage. 3. That said road known as Twin Mountain Circle and which is shown on a certain sketch accompanying this Resolution, be, and the same is hereby established as public road to become a part of the State Secondary System of Highways in Roanoke County, only from and after notification of official acceptance of said street or highway by the Virginia Department of Transportation. On motion of Supervisor Johnson, seconded by Supervisor McGraw, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisor Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None `"" 1 November 15, 1989 2 3 2 Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Roanoke County Administration Center 3738 Brambleton Avenue, SW Roanoke, Virginia 24018 November 15, 1989 The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, met this day at the Roanoke County Administration Center, this being the second Wednesday, and the first regularly scheduled meeting of the month of November, 1989. IN RE: CALL TO ORDER Chairman Garrett called the meeting to order at 3:02 p.m. The roll call was taken. MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Lee Garrett, Vice Chairman Richard Robers, Supervisors Steven A. McGraw, Harry C. Nickens MEMBERS ABSENT: Supervisor Bob L. Johnson STAFF PRESENT: Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator; John M. Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator for Human Services; John R. Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator of Community Services and Development; Don M. Myers, Assistant County Administrator for Management Services; Paul M. Mahoney, November 15, 1989 2 3 4 - N upervisor o nson PROCLAMATION DECLARING THE WEER OF NOVEMBER 12 - 18, 1989 AS AMERICAN EDIICATION WEER WHEREAS, the citizens of our community have long recognized the historic link between education and a strong, free nation; and WHEREAS, our public schools have enabled generations of American families to build upon the lessons of the past to achieve the dreams of tomorrow; and WHEREAS, America's system of public education relies not only on the skills and dedication of teachers, school administrators, and education support staff, but also on the encouragement and support of the entire community. NOW, THEREFORE, WE, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, do hereby proclaim the week of November 12 through 18, 1989, as AMERICAN EDIICATION WEER and urge all citizens to reaffirm their commitment to our public schools and to recognize the critical role that learning plays in the preservation of liberty. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, WE have hereunto set our hands and caused the seal of the County of Roanoke, Virginia, to be affixed this 15th day of November, 1989. 2. Resolution of Appreciation to the City of Richmond November 15, 1989 2 3 6 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors, on behalf of itself and the citizens and the employees of the County, does hereby convey its deepest appreciation and gratitude for the assistance provided by the City of Richmond and its employees during the aftermath of Hurricane Hugo. On motion of Supervisor Garrett, seconded by Supervisor Nickens, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisor Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Johnson IN RE: NEW BUSINESS 1. Resolution of Support for the Public Policy Platform of the Virginia Coalition for the Aaina and requests for state funding. R-111589-2 County Administrator Elmer Hodge introduced Susan William Executive Director of the League of Older Americans and Prentiss Webb, Chairman of the Virginia Coalition for the Aging, who advised that the Virginia Department for the Aging has submitted a budget addendum to the Governor for an appropriation of $22.6 million for community based services designed to prevent or slow institutionalization of the elderly in Virginia. They asked for support from Roanoke County for this funding request. Supervisor Nickens moved to adopt the prepared November 15, 1989 2 3 greatest social and economic need in an effort to prevent costly institutionalization that has a significant impact on the State's Medicaid budget. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors hereby urges the Governor of Virginia and the Virginia General Assembly to appropriate $22.6 million for long-term care services and $3.5 million for transportation services as requested by the Virginia Department of Aging for the next biennium to maintain life sustaining services to frail and disadvantaged older Virginians. On motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by Supervisor McGraw, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisor Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Johnson 2. Yearly Report from the Mental Health Services of the Roanoke Valley. Rita Gliniecki, County appointee from the Mental Health Services of the Roanoke Valley was present to highlight the services provided to the citizens of Roanoke County. Supervisor Nickens moved to receive and file the report. The motion was seconded by Supervisor McGraw, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None November 15, 1989 2 4 Q Board of Supervisors to develop and operate a sanitary landfill. The Resource Authority is now in the process of purchasing the land and arranging for the application process. Ms. Hyatt advised that in December the Resource Authority will issue $2 million in bond anticipation notes and to ensure that these notes are marketable it is necessary for the Board of Supervisors to provide assurance that the notes will be paid if the landfill project is discontinued and the bonds are never issued. There was no discussion and Supervisor Nickens moved to adopt the prepared resolution. The motion was seconded by Supervisor McGraw, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Johnson 1~9QIIlrICN 111589-4 OF ~ BCY~ttD Q- SUF~FRVI90[t5 ~ ~ QOiQ~Tl'Y ~ RQ~ii~[~, VIIaGII~IU WIZS RFSPE(,'I' 'In Ii~iNQ~ C10C~J1'Y RF90[~C'8 AITI9~tITY IArIDFIId, FIldAAlCII~ The Board of Supervisors ("Board") of the County of Roanoke, Virginia ("County") created the Roanoke County Resource Authority ("Authority") by resolution adopted June 14, 1989. The Authority was created, among other things, to provide for the developrn~nt and operation of a sanitary landfill to serve the County and such other entities as the Authority may determine ("Project"). The Authority intends to finance the acquisition, construction, development and equipping of the Project by the issuance of its revenue bonds ("Bonds") and notes in anticipation thereof ("Notes"). The Board has determined that it is in the best interest of the County to assist the Authority in the acquisition, construction, development and equipping of the Project and the financing thereof. NC)W, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVID BY THE BQAItD OF SUPERVISORS ~" THE CDUN1'Y OF ~, VIRGINIA: November 15, 1989 2 4 2 to guarantee. Mr. Hodge advised that staff now recommends going forward with recruitment of volunteers, proceeding with selection of an architect, establishment of a committee of citizens from the Bonsack area to work with staff to work on solutions, and authorization to meet with the managers of Botetourt County, Vinton and Roanoke City to discuss a regional approach regarding this fire station. Mr. Hodge stated he would bring back recommendations on December 19, 1989. Supervisor Nickens asked that a definitive decision be made at the December meeting. Several board members urged that the issue not become politicized and that all involved keep an "open mind". In response to a question from Supervisor Robers, Mr. Hodge advised that they plan an average five-minute response time within one year or additional paid firefighters will be added. 5B. Report on Implementation of Police Department Mr. Hodge presented a proposed schedule for implementation which is scheduled for July 1, 1990. He further advised that a committee made up of the local chief law enforcement officials, the Fire Chief and the Director of Human Resources, will be established to assist in drafting a job description, reviewing the candidates and formulating a transition plan. Another advisory committee made up of employees from the current Sheriff's Department will serve as a forum for relaying questions and concerns of the employees, and one November 15, 1989 Conference held on November 12-14. He also announced the disassociation of VACo from the Virginia Review Magazine. SUPERVISOR GARRETT: Congratulated Supervisor McGraw upon his election as President-Elect of VACo. IN RE: CONSENT AGENDA fit-111589-5 Supervisor Nickens asked that Item 6 be removed for discussion. Supervisor Nickens moved to approve the Consent Agenda with Item 6 removed. The motion was seconded by Supervisor NcGraw, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Johnson RESOLUTION NO. 111589-5 APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMB SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM R - CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for November 15, 1989, designated as Item K - Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 6, inclusive, as follows: November 15, 1989 2 `~ 6 BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That this matter came this day to be heard upon the proceedings herein, and upon the application of Stonewood Drive, from Texas Hollow Road (Route 641) to the cul-de-sac to be accepted and made a part of the Secondary System of State High- ways under Section 33.1-229 of the Virginia State Code. 2.That it appears to the Board that drainage easements and a fifty (50) foot right-of-way for said road have heretofore been dedicated by virtue of a certain map\maps known as Section 1, Stonewood Subdivision which may was recorded in Plat Book 10, Page 130, of the records of the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, on February 3, 1986 and that by reason of the recordation of said map no report from a Board of Viewers, nor consent or donation of right-of-way from the abutting property owners is necessary. The Board hereby guarantees said right-of-way for drainage. 3.That said road known as Stonewood Drive, from Texas Hollow Road (Route 641) to the cul-de-sac and which is shown on a certain sketch accompanying this Resolution, be, and the same is hereby established as public road to become a part of the State Secondary System of Highways in Roanoke County, only from and after notification of official acceptance of said street or highway by the Virginia Department of Transportation. On motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by Supervisor McGraw, and carried by the following recorded vote: November 15, 1989 ,2 4 8 part o the State Secon ary System of Highways in Roanoke County, only from and after notification of official acceptance of said street or highway by the Virginia Department of Transportation. On motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by Supervisor McGraw, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisor Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Johnson IN RE: AIITHORIZATION TO EBECIITE A CONTRACT TO ESTABLISH AN INTEGRATED AIITOMATED LIBRARY SYSTEM. Supervisor Nickens advised he was informed there was a potential savings of between $250,000 to $300,000 by looking at an alternative to the hardware that would drive the automated system. He felt this should be investigated further before a contract is authorized. Mr. Hodge responded that although there is a possibility of cost savings, the project has gone too far to get Roanoke City and Salem to agree to investigate other alternatives. Supervisor Nickens suggested that if it is too late to investigate savings, perhaps Roanoke County should choose not to participate. Supervisor Robers asked Assistant County Administrator John Chambliss to review the reason why the VPI&SU system could not be utilized. Mr. Chambliss replied that proposals were sent to VPI but were not among the final two systems that were November 15, 1989 25 Mr. Mahoney advised since this is a procedural matter, and the Chairman should. make the determination regarding the tie vote. The Chairman ruled that the motion failed. Supervisor McGraw moved to go into Executive Session pursuant to the Code of Virginia 2.1-344 (a) (7) to discuss a legal matter regarding a contract with the Cities of Roanoke and Salem. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Nickens, and failed by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McGraw, Garrett NAYS: Supervisors Robers, McGraw ABSENT: Supervisor Johnson Supervisor Nickens moved to reject authorization to execute the contract. There was no second and the motion died. Mr. Mahoney advised that if the contract is submitted substantially in compliance with that approved by the Board of Supervisors in July, he would execute the agreement and submit to the County Administrator. Supervisor Garrett moved to authorize the County Administrator to execute the contract. There was no second and the motion died. Supervisor McGraw moved to delay the decision until either the November 28th or the December 19th meeting to allow staff to study and gather further information. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Garrett, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett November 15, 1989 Z 5 2 3. Board Contingency Fund IN RE: ADJOIIRNMENT There being no Executive Session, at 4:35 p.m., Supervisor Nickens moved to adjourn. The motion was seconded by Supervisor McGraw, and carried by the voice recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Johnson Lee Garrett, Chairman ~ -/ November 28, 1989 2 ~ 3 Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Roanoke County Administration Center 3738 Brambleton Avenue, SW Roanoke, Virginia 24018 November 28, 1989 The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, met this day at the Roanoke County Administra- tion Center, this being the Fourth Tuesday, and the second regularly scheduled meeting of the month of November, 1989. IN RE: CALL TO ORDER Chairman Garrett called the meeting to order at 3:03 p.m. The roll call was taken. MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Lee Garrett, Vice Chairman Richard Robers, Supervisors Bob L. Johnson, Steven A. McGraw, Harry C. Nickens (arrived at 3:15 p.m.) MEMBERS ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: John M. Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator for Human Services; John R. Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator of Community Services and Development; Don M. Myers, Assistant County Administrator for Management Services; Paul M. Mahoney, 255 November 28, 1989 A-112889-1 Engineering Director Phillip Henry presented the staff report, advising that drainage projects were presented for approval to the Board on October 10th. Staff is now submitting an additional project at an estimated cost of $50,000 for approval and inclusion in the priority list. Mr. Henry advised that with the addition of this project, the unfunded drainage maintenance list is $180,000. Mr. Henry described the drainage problems. Staff recommended that the Hidden Valley Court drainage problem be added to the priority list with the start of construction after July 1, 1990 when funding is available. Supervisor Johnson was concerned that a project would be added without proper funding. He moved to approve the addition of the Hidden Valley Court drainage project to the priority list and appropriate the $50,000 funds, but not authorize an additional engineering position unless or until it becomes necessary. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Garrett. In response to a question from Supervisor McGraw, Mr. Henry advised that the project was worthy of being added to the priority list and very similar to projects already on the list. In response to a question from Supervisor Robers, Mr. Henry explained the criteria for establishing the priority list and advised that this project met the criteria. Supervisor Nickens expressed concern about funding another drainage project when there is not enough staff to handle November 28, 1989 2 5 T Engineers. He described what the study will cover. Supervisor Nickens moved to adopt the prepared resolution with Roanoke County's funding share appropriated from the Board Contingency Fund. The motion was seconded by Supervisor McGraw, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None RESOLOTION 112889-2 SOPPORTING A REGIONAL APPROACH TO WATERSHED PLANNING AND STORMWATER MANAGEMENT FOR THE ROANORE VALLEY WHEREAS, the Fifth Planning District Commission, at the request of Roanoke Valley governments, prepared a Feasibility Study for a Roanoke Valley Comprehensive _Stormwater Management Program in 1985 which presented a detailed analysis of: (1) the benefits of a regional stormwater management program, (2) drainage problems and future stormwater management concerns, (3) existing local stormwater management programs, (4) databases for stormwater management planning, (5) a proposed approach to regional stormwater management planning, and (6) institutional and regulatory issues affecting stormwater management; and WHEREAS, this study determined that twenty-two of the thirty-nine watersheds in the Roanoke Valley are interjurisdictional and development activities in the upper reaches of these tributaries will adversely affect areas November 28, 1989 2 5 9 AYES: Supervisor Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None 3. Authorization for credit of water off-site facility fee for Tweeds. A-112889-3 Utility Director Clifford Craig reported that Roanoke County agreed to provide water to the Tweeds site. A Community Development Block Grant in the amount of $66,790 has been made available to fund the off-site water facilities and Tweeds has requested that Roanoke County consider these grant funds as their contribution to the off-site water facility construction. Staff requested the Board to consider the CDBG funds as their contribution with their total water connection fee of $21,393. Supervisor Johnson moved to approve staff recommendation. The motion was seconded by Supervisor McGraw, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None 4. Write-off of Utility bad debts for 1983 and 1984. A-112889-4 Finance Director Diane Hyatt advised that staff is requesting the write-off of $42,063.68 bad debts from utility accounts. These include the last of the refuse collection accounts. Efforts have been made to locate these customers and November 28, 1989 ~ 6 legislative requests. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Robers, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None 6. Amendment to the County Holiday Schedule A-11289-5 Supervisor Garrett moved to authorize an additional holiday on December 26, 1989. The motion was seconded by Supervisor McGraw, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None IN RE: REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS Supervisor Johnson requested a public hearing on December 19, 1989 on the charter for the proposed consolidation of Roanoke County and Roanoke City IN RE: REQIIESTS FOR PUBLIC SEARING AND FIRBT READING FOR REZONING ORDINANCE - CONSENT AGENDA Supervisor Garrett moved to approve first reading and requests for public hearings on December 19, 1989 on the following rezoning ordinances. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Johnson, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None November 28, 1989 2 6 2 Blacksburg on the Smart Highway which was attended by VPI President McComas, Congressman Jim Olin, Ray Penthal from the Virginia Department of Transportation and local legislators. He advised that there was strong support to add the technology to the highway and there will be a meeting in January with major industries who might have a vested interest in the highway. SIIPERVISOR MCGRAW: Reported on the Grayson Commission meeting on November 20. He announced that the final meeting will be on December 9, and advised that the VML/VACO Task Force has had much impact on the Grayson Commission. SIIPERVZSOR NICRENB: Requested that Mr. Sumpter from the Virginia Department of Transportation and Mr. Hope from the Blue Ridge Parkway be invited to the January 9, 1990 meeting to update the board members on the east circumferential highway. IN RE: CONSENT AGENDA R-112889-6 Supervisor Johnson moved to approve the Consent Agenda. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Garrett, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None RESOLIITION 112889-6 APPROVING AND CONCIIRRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SIIPERVISORS November 28, 1989 2 6 5 a. The total costs to publish the annual report, including the costs of inhouse time, materials, and external costs so that the cost per taxpayer could be determined. b. The total cost to Roanoke County to relocate Tweeds, Inc. to the County. Chairman Garrett advised he would have the information prepared for Mr. Powell. IN RE: REPORTS Supervisor Nickens moved to receive and file the following reports. The motion was seconded by Supervisor McGraw, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None 1. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance 2. General Fund Unappropriated Balance 3. Board Contingency Fund IN RE: EXECUTIVE SESSION At 4:45 p.m., Supervisor Garrett moved to go into Executive Session pursuant to the Code of Virginia 2.1-344 A (7) to consult with legal counsel pertaining to legal matters requiring the provision of legal advice by counsel: consolidation; (3) to discuss disposition of publicly held real estate for economic development purposes. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Nickens, and carried by the following November 28, 1989 Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia hereby certifies that, to the best of each members knowledge: 1. Only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements by Virginia law were discussed in the executive meeting which this certification resolution applies, and 2. Only such public business matters as were identified in the motion convening the executive meeting were heard, discussed or considered by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. On motion of Supervisor Garrett, seconded by Supervisor Nickens, and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None IN RE: RECESS At 6:47 P.M., Chairman Garrett declared a dinner recess. EVENING SESSION (7:00 P.M.) IN RE: FIRST READING OF ORDINANCE 1. Ordinance Rescinding Ordinance dated October 24, 1989 for sale of ten acres in Glenvar (Shamrock Field) Economic Development Specialist Brian Duncan informed November 28, 1989 2 6 g . one IN RE; POBLIC HEARINGB AND SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1189-i An ordinance to amend the Future Land IIse Plan map designation of approximately 54 acres located vest of Hollins Road and south of Lois Lane in the Hollins Magisterial District from Development to Principal Industrial and to change the zoning classification from R-1 to M-i for industrial development purposes with conditions upon the application of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia This item was continued to December 19, 1989. 1189-2 An ordinance to change the zoning classification of approximately 15 acres of real estate located at the end of Benois Road in the Cave Spring Magisterial District from R-i to M-i for industrial development with conditions upon the application of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. Planning Director Terry Harrington reported that two significant impact factors were identified by the Planning Commission regarding single family homes adjacent to the site. The Planning Commission recommended proffered conditions to protect the single family residences. The conditions were agreed to with the exception of the 100 foot buffer year which was reduced to 50 feet. Mr. Mahoney offered several options for action: the ordinance can be amended to include the proffered conditions; the Board may continue the rezoning to December 19, 1989; or the rezoning may be sent back to the Planning Commission, since the November 28, 1989 2 of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. 0-112889-8 Mr. Harrington informed the Board that this is known as the Shamrock site. At the Planning Commission, proffered conditions were offered and additional proffers have since been added. The only significant impact factor was the fact that rezoning was not in comformity with the Land Use Plan and the Planning Commission recommended that if the rezoning is approved, an amendment to the Land Use Plan from Core to Principal Industrial should be approved. The Planning Commission recommended approval. In response to a question from Supervisor Nickens regarding inconsistencies concerning environmental factors and signage, Mr. Harrington advised that conditions limit the types of uses for the property and signage is in comfority with the proposed sign ordinance. Supervisor Garrett moved to approve the rezoning and ordinance. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Robers, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None ABSTAIN: Supervisor McGraw ORDINANCE 112889-8 TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF AP- PROXIMATELY 8 ACREB OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED AT THE SODTHEAST CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION OF BTATE ROIITE 643 AND I-81 IN THE CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL November 28, 1989 ~1 7 ? zoning classification of M-1, Light Industrial District, for industrial development. 2. That the Board initiated the application to change the zoning classification of this real estate located in Roanoke County to serve the public purposes of the County as required by public necessity, convenience, general welfare, and good zoning practice to implement the recommendations of the Economic Development Action Plan for FY 1989-90. 3. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: Beginning at a concrete highway monument marking the corner of the rights-of-way of Route 643 and Interstate Highway Route 81; thence N. 55° 29' E. 450 feet, more or less, to a point in the center of a drainage ditch; thence following the meanders of the drainage ditch in a southerly direction 875 feet, more or less, to a point; thence S. 53° 52' W. 426 feet, more or less, to a point on the eastern right-of-way of Route 643; thence following the said right-of-way N. 15° 12' 30" W. 128.21 feet to a concrete highway monument; thence N. 12° 21' W. 194 feet to a concrete highway monument; thence N. 15° 17' 10" W. 417.14 feet to the place of beginning and containing 7.96 acres, more or less; and as shown on a plat of survey, entitled "Property Exchange, Tract A," prepared by the Roanoke County Department of Public Facilities, dated September 16, 1986, attached hereto. 4. That Roanoke County as owner of this real estate has voluntarily proffered in writing the following conditions which the Board of Supervisors hereby accepts: (1) The property will not include permitted uses for: (a) Automobile painting, upholstering, November 28, 1989 2 7 5 0-112889-9 Mr. Harrington presented the staff report. He advised that the property was rezoned to M-1 in 1983. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the request. There was no discussion and no one was present to speak. Supervisor Johnson moved to approve the ordinance. The motion was seconded by Supervisor McGraw, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None ORDINANCE 112889-9 TO AMEND THE FIITIIRE LAND IISE PLAN MAP DESIGNA- TION OF APPRO%IMATELY 25 ACRES LOCATED EAST OF CARVINS COVE DAM ROAD AND IMMEDIATELY NORTH I-81 IN THE CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM DEVELOPMENT TO PRINCIPAL IN- DIISTRIAL. WHEREAS, by Resolution 91289-4 the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, initiated amendments to the Com- prehensive Plan and to the classifications of certain real estate located in Roanoke County to serve the public purposes of the County as required by public necessity, convenience, general welfare, and good zoning practice to implement the recommendations of the Economic Development Action Plan for FY 1989-90; and November 28, 1989 2 Roanoke County, Virginia. This rezoning request was continued to December 19, 1989. 1189-7 Ordinance amending C2-apter 8, "Erosion and Sediment Control", of the Roanoke County Code by amending Section 8-ii (a), "Control Measures Generally" to provide for tDe adoption of stormwater management criteria; and Resolution adopting a nev section of the Design and Construction Standards Manual entitled "BtormNater Management Criteria."(CONTZNOED FROM OCTOBER 24, 1989) This item was continued to December 19, 1989. IN RE; FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance repealing Ordinance 83-174 and adopting a new ordinance requirinct the filing of a_disclosure statement of economic interests and other specified information pursuant to Section 2 1-639 14 of the Code of Virginia. Mr. Mahoney reported that the ordinance adopted in 1983 is no longer valid and should be repealed. The new ordinance specifies the local officials and committee members who must file Statement of Disclosures forms and real estate disclosure forms, and brings the County ordinance into compliance with the state code. There was no discussion and no one was present to speak. November 28, 1989 At 9:07 p.m., Supervisor Johnson moved to return to Open Session and certify the Executive Session. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Nickens, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor McGraw (was present for Executive Session but absent for Certification vote. Written certification was later received from Supervisor McGraw.) RESOLIITION 112889-10 CERTIFYING EBECIITIVE MEETING WAS HELD IN CONFORMITY WITH THE CODE OF VIRGINIA WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia has convened an executive meeting on this date, at its evening session at 8:00 p.m., pursuant to an affirmative recorded vote and in accordance with the provisions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and WHEREAS, Section 2.1-344.1 of the Code of Virginia requires a certification by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia that such executive meeting was conducted in conformity with Virginia Law. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia hereby certifies that, to the best of each members knowledge: 1. Only public business matters lawfully exempted from December 19, 1989 281 Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Roanoke County Administration Center 3738 Brambleton Avenue, SW Roanoke, Virginia 24018 December 19, 1989 The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, met this day at the Roanoke County Administration Center, this being the third Tuesday, and the only regularly scheduled meeting of the month of December, 1989. IN RE: CALL TO ORDER Chairman Garrett called the meeting to order at 3:15 p.m. The roll call was taken. MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Lee Garrett, Vice Chairman Richard Robers, Supervisors Bob L. Johnson, Steven A. McGraw, Harry C. Nickens MEMBERS ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator; John M. Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator for Human Services; John R. Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator of Community Services and Development; Don M. . - Myers, Assistant County Administrator for Management Services; Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney, Mary H. Allen, Clerk to - the Board; Anne Marie Fedder, Information December 19, 1989 283 Counties Justice & Public Safety Steering Committee. d. Elmer C. Hodge - National Association of Counties Intergovernmental Relations Steering Committee. e. Elizabeth Leah - President of the Virginia Registrar's Association. f. Ken Hogan - President of the Virginia Animal Control Association. Vice Chairman Robers announced that several County officials and staff have been named as officers to state and national professional organizations. Present to be recognized were Steven McGraw, Alfred C. Anderson, Elmer C. Hodge and Elizabeth Leah. 2. Recognition of the Cave Spring Jaycees for being named the top chapter in the State. R-121989-1 Mickey Johnson, president of the Cave Spring Jaycees, was present to receive a resolution of appreciation. Supervisor Nickens moved to adopt the prepared resolution. The motion was seconded by Supervisor McGraw, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None RESOLUTION 121989-1 OF APPRECIATION TO THE CAVE SPRING JAYCEES FOR BEING NAMEDTHE TOP CHAPTER IN THE STATE December 19, 1989 2 8 organization in the State. NOW, THEREFORE, B$ IT .RESOLVED, that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors, on behalf of itself and all residents of the Valley, does hereby extend its gratitude and appreciation to the Cave Sprinq Jaycees for all that the members give to this community; and FURTHER, the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors does hereby extend its congratulations to the Cave Sprinq Jaycees for being named the top Chapter in the State. On motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by Supervisor McGraw, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisor Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None 3. Resolution of Appreciation to Lee Garrett, for service as a member of the Board of Supervisors. R-121989-2 Vice Chairman Robers presented the resolution to Chairman Garrett and also presented him with a framed photograph depicting the history of the regional airport. Supervisor McGraw moved to adopt the prepared resolution. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Nickens, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None December 19, 1989 2 appreciation to LEE GARRETT for his outstanding contributions to the County as a member of the Board of Supervisors; and FORTHERMORE, the Board extends its deepest hopes that Mr. Garrett continues his involvement with and concern for the citizens of Roanoke County. On motion of Supervisor McGraw, seconded by Supervisor Nickens, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisor Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None 4. Resolution and Report on Shenandoah Homes Fire. R-121989-3 Mr. Hodge advised that a report had been prepared regarding the Shenandoah Homes fire on December 14, 1989. He announced that the Fire and Rescue Department and the National Fire Protection Association have both investigated the fire, and a report will be forthcoming in several weeks. Mr. Hodge reported that a committee had been formed to review the incident and response times. They have been charged to make recommendations for the future. The committee was composed of Tommy Fuqua, David Hafey, Frances Murrie, Steve Poff, Don Gillespie and Rick Wallace. Mr. Hodge announced that staff will also draft an incentive policy aimed at encouraging nursing and adult home facilities to retrofit with sprinkler systems. Supervisor Johnson expressed deep appreciation on behalf of the Board of Supervisors to the many firefighters, December 19, 1989 2 8 9 s -freez ng night to assist those residents during this devastating situation; and WHEREAS, members of the Roanoke County Sheriff's Office began the evacuation of the residents; and WHEREAS, six fire companies and eight rescue squads responded to the fire, performing in a heroic manner at all times; and WHEREAS, in the true spirit of regional cooperation, neighboring localities offered their assistance by manning the stations who responded to the fire and Roanoke City rescue squads joined in the evacuation process; and WHEREAS, the staff and residents of Shenandoah Homes facilitated the efforts of the fire and rescue personnel using their knowledge and skills learned in previous fire drills; and WHEREAS, the Roanoke County School System provided school buses to transport the residents of the retirement home to an emergency evacuation center; and WHEREAS, Peggy and Raymond Setchel offered the use of the Star City Roller Skating Center as an emergency evacuation shelter. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, wishes to express its pride and admiration to those individuals and organizations for their many efforts to aid the residents at the Shenandoah Homes retirement complex; and FURTHER, The Board, on behalf of the citizens of December 19, 1989 2 upervisor Nickens moved to approve the staff recommendation. The motion was seconded by Supervisor McGraw, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None 2. Request for authorization to execute a contract to establish an Automated Library System with the Cities of Roanoke and Salem. A-121989-5 Mr. Hodge presented the staff report. He announced that the issue had been delayed at the last board meeting and that Roanoke City took action on December 4 to execute the contract contingent on participation by the County. Mr. Hodge recommended authorization of the contract with either the County's share of the funds to be financed by Roanoke City or financed by the County from the unappropriated balance. He expressed preference for the County funding its own share. Assistant County Administrator John Chambliss stated that the cities of Roanoke and Salem will go ahead with the automated system even if Roanoke County chooses not to. In response to a question from Supervisor Nickens regarding what staff has done since the last meeting, Mr. Chambliss advised that they had contacted the vendors and reviewed the documents as to •~ whether the system could be used with the present equipment in December 19,~ 1989 2 9 3 ,~ Authorization to proceed with eminent domain for a sanitary sewer easement. A-121989-6 Utility Director Clifford Craig announced that design for Valleypointe Phase II sanitary sewer is complete and agreement for easement acquisition has been reached on all but one easement. Roanoke County has offered to pay 40~ of the full assessed valuation for this easement, but Mr. Jesse N. Jones has asked ten times that amount. Staff is requesting authorization to begin eminent domain proceedings. Mr. Mahoney advised that he may have to bring this matter back for a public hearing to authorize entry. Supervisor Johnson moved to authorize eminent domain proceedings. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Nickens, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None ABSTAIN: Supervisor McGraw 4. Approval of Public Private Partnership Agreement with Hansteck Inc. A-121989-7 Economic Development Director announced that Hansteck, Inc. is relocating their paint roller manufacturing business to the County. They will relocate $475,000 capital equipment and 52 X95 December 19, 1989 YES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None 6. 1990 Leaislative Program. A-121989-9 Mr. Mahoney advised that this issue was continued from the last meeting for changes. He reviewed the changes that were made. Supervisor Johnson pointed out that both the County and School Board were asking for a one-half cent local option sales tax and only one request should go forward. He also did not feel Roanoke County should support opposition to compulsory binding arbitration for public school employees. Supervisor Johnson moved to remove these two items from the legislative requests. The motion was seconded by Supervisor McGraw, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None Supervisor Nickens moved to approve the legislative program as amended by Supervisor Johnson's motion. The motion was seconded by Supervisor McGraw , and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None 7. Approval for an additional Drainage Engineer. December 19, 1989 2 9 -~ 8. Authorization to acquire right of way for road improvements to Bushdale Road. A-121989-11 Mr. Henry reported that Bushdale Road has been on the Rural Addition Priority List for upgrade for future state maintenance. Staff has reviewed several alternatives and feels that the most feasible is to provide a relocated alignment of Bushdale Road to intersect at Mayfield Drive. Mr. Henry advised that it was likely that the acquisition for right-of-way will require payment and possibly condemnation. It was recommended that the Board authorize acquisition of right-of-way acquisition for the upgrade of Bushdale Road and to appropriate the funds to proceed. If condemnation is necessary, a request to go forward will come back to the Board. Supervisor Robers expressed concern because this is setting precedent by offering to pay for the right-of-way which was not previously done. Supervisor Nickens pointed out that when Bushdale Road was added to the Rural Addition Priority List in June of 1987, it was expected that eminent domain might be exercised. Supervisor Nickens moved to approve the staff recommendation. The motion was seconded by Supervisor McGraw, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None December 19, 1989 ~ 9 - qa on n s. Utility Director Clifford Craig advised that the staff is currently negotiating the purchase of three water systems from Water Distributors, Inc. and Cherry Hill Water Company. Staff is requesting approval to purchase the three water systems with funds available from the 1986 bond issue. Supervisor Nickens suggested modifications to the ordinance with #3 regarding the Falling Creek Water System amended so that the Town of Vinton reimburses actual costs to Roanoke County, which will transfer the ownership of the water system to the Town, who will then provide water to the designated areas. Mr. Mahoney advised he felt the ordinance was flexible enough to allow the modifications to the water agreement. Mr. Hodge suggested that prior to the second reading, the County staff work with the Town of Vinton to ensure an understanding of the transaction. Supervisor Nickens moved to approve first reading of the ordinance.. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Robers, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None IN RE: SECOND READING OF ORDINANCE 1. Ordinance repealing Ordinance 83-174 and adopting December 19, 1989 301 . Hance o con orm w th the revised State Code; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on November 28, 1989, and the second reading of this ordinance was held on December 19, 1989. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that Ordinance No. 83-174 is hereby repealed. Further, a new ordinance requiring the filing of a disclosure statement of economic interests and other specified information pursuant to Section 2.1-639.14 of the Code of Virginia be adopted as follows: 1. That in addition to the members of the Board of Supervisors and the Constitutional Officers of Roanoke County, Virginia, the following persons occupying certain positions of trust appointed by the Board of Supervisors and such other persons employed by the County be, and they hereby are, designated and directed to file as a condition to assuming office or employment or continuing in such position to file a disclosure statement of their personal interests and such other information as is specified on the form set forth in Section 2.1-639.15 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and shall thereafter file such a statement annually on or before January 15, to-wit: County Administrator County Attorney Director of Economic Development 2. Nonsalaried citizen members of the following December 19, 1989 303 than December 10 of each year to each officer or person required to file such a form pursuant to this ordinance or Section 2.1- 639.15 or Section 2.1-639.15:1 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended. Such disclosure forms shall be filed and maintained as public records for five years in the office of the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County. 5. The effective date of this ordinance shall be January 1, 1990. On motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by Supervisor Johnson, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisor Johnson, Robers, McGraw, Nickens, Garrett NAYS: None 2. Ordinance rescinding Ordinance No. 102489-5 and accepting an offer for and authorizing the sale of 5 acres, more or less, in the Glenvar West Portion of Roanoke County (Shamrock Field . 0-121989-14 Economic Development Specialist Brian Duncan advised that Plantation and Kanter is offering to purchase 5 acres of Shamrock Park at $23,000 per acre for the purpose of constructing a 25,000 square foot manufacturing facility for Ingersoll Rand. The approximate annual tax revenue is $22,730. Supervisor Johnson moved to separate the vote on the appropriation of funds for improvements to Green Hill Park. The motion was seconded by Supervisor Garrett, and carried by the December 19, 1989 3 ~ 5 declared to be surplus and is being made available for other public uses, i.e. economic development; and 2. That Ordinance No. 102489-5 accepting an offer for and authorizing the sale of ten (10) acres, more or less, in the Glenvar West portion of Roanoke County (Shamrock Field) and Item 5 of Item K - Consent Agenda - of the November 15, 1989, Board meeting authorizing an appropriation of capital funds for the Green Hill Park improvements are hereby rescinded. 3. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading was held on November 28, 1989; and a second reading was held on December 19, 1989, concerning the sale and disposition of five (5) acres, more or less, in the Glenvar West portion of Roanoke County (Shamrock field); and 4. That offers having been received for said property, the offer of Plantation and Kanter, G. P. for Twenty- three Thousand Dollars ($23,000) per acre to purchase five (5) acres, more or less, for One Hundred Fifteen Thousand Dollars ($115,000) is hereby accepted and all other offers are rejected; and 5. That all proceeds from the sale of this real estate are to be placed in the capital facility account; and 6. That the County Administrator is authorized to execute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County as are necessary to accomplish the conveyance of said property, all of which shall be upon form approved by the County •~aE.zbo~d satpn~S tEUOi~EU.za~ul puE a~Ea.znEtEOOEg Mau auk bu~~uauzaTdm~t uo p.zEOg toouoS roaatES auk pa~Etn~E.zbuo0 :ay~~o ?IOSIA2I3dIIS ' 066t ' S ~.zEnuEr a.zo3aq buzgaaut tEUt3 sit anEu tt~M uoisstunuo0 uos~CE.zO aq~ ~Eq~ pastnp~ :MK2I~~I 2iOSIA2iSdIIS •ToouoS 33TPunJ 'S 'M o~ toouoS p2og ~Tp.zEg aq~ paazEUa.z p.zEOg joouoS auk a.zagM ~Cuoma.zao E papua~~E suaxoTx zosin~adnS puE aq ~Eu~ paounoccu~ :xOSHIiOr 2iOSIA2I3dIIS sx~~t a~roe ~o s~Ixln~xl ax~r ssxoa~x • ~oiigsTQ tEF.za~stbEy~ EQlrIE~E~ 'pEOg ano0 OZ6ti qE pagEOOt 'sgonpOid tE~au 3o uOT~E~~ZQE3 puE abE~ogs q~~.zad oq T-y~ o~ Z-8 ~0=3 goESq azoE gg• E auoza.z djtEUOigipuoo oq •ouI saTagsnpul sao~nzaS tEUO~ssa3o~d 3o uo~q~gad •5 QOT.Z~STQ tEiiags~bEy~ stt~g .zospuiM 'anuan~ uogajgaEig 5S9£ puE LOG£ pu~uaq ~TjTEiauab pagEOOt 'sasnogaiEr~-TUi~ gonz~suoo o~ t-y~ oq Z-g ~aoi3 ~aE.zq a.zoE 9t0 • t E auozai 1~jtEUOT~~puoo o~ pu8 '6861 'Ot ~agoranox pagEp uEtd gdaouoo E ggtw aouep~oooE u~ goE~q aioE t0•t E uo suo~~~puoo pa.za33o.zd aqq pua~E oq uo~gE.zocLzo0 abEiogS uogatgaQE~g 3o uo~q~gad ' ~ •go~~gs~Q jE~iags~bEy~ uo~u~A '(pEO?I aaEdsoia~) 6£6 a~nog ;0 33o pa~Eaoj 'uo~s~n~pgns e dotanap oq Z-K ~os3 sa~oE 6Z ~CjagE~~xoidda auozai o~ uo~~Eiod~o0 ua.zEasag aoEdsoia~ 3o uo~q~gad •£ • ga~igs~Q TE~iags~bEy~ bLlj.Idg anEO ' anziQ tE3.ZEdELj, 3o uozgoas.zaqu~ aqq ~E 6th agnog 3o apts you ate qE pa~EOOt '886T '8Z qo=ER PagEp uEjd gdaouoo E u~iw aouEp~oooE u~ xiEd ao~33o uE gonzgsuoo oq saioE 6•£ djagE~~xoiddE uo suo~~~puoo paaa~3oid pua~E oq •ouI 'uoiPtEM 3 u~jE.z,~ 3o uo~~~gad 'Z :sx xI •go~.zgs~Q jE~iags~bEy~ su~tjog 'peog uosiEO puE Ogg/tt sagnog uaar~~aq pagEOOt '~uamdoTanap jE~=gsnpu~ so3 T-1~I oq $-2i uo=3 ~T~zado=d p~ES auoza~ oq puE jeFigsnpul tEd~au~id L 0 ~ 686t '6t saq~aaaQ buiMOttO; auq tCq paz~.zeo pue 'suaxoTx .zosTA.ZadnS ~Cq papuooas ' Z-Z l1la~j aAO.zddE O~ tlOSUgOr .zosTA2adnS ;O tiOT~O~ uQ auoH ~SxKH ~ga.z.ze~ 'suaxoix 'Me.z~oy~ 's.zagog 'uosugor .zostn.zadnS ~S3x~i :aeon pap~ooa.z buiMOTto; aqq ~Tq pai.z.zeo pue 'Me.z~oy~I .zosinzadnS ~Cq papuooas 'panotua.z Z u~agj q~TM ano.zdde o~ suaxotx ~ostn.zadng ;o uoi~o~u up •uozgnTosa.z sTgq o} quens.znd uta~t Bons ~Tue .zo; uoi~eTnge~ aeon age.zedas aqq suaaq~ pies ;o Cue uodn q}.zo; has oq Mej ~Cq pa.zinba.z a.zagM pagoa.zTp pue pazt.zoggne ~Cga~aq st pzeog aqq oq X.zaT~ aqq ~eqy •Z •ugor 'qS aueiQ pue ugor 'qS 'r ~~e8 ~o~; quaittasea abeuTe~p a ;o uoT~euoo •6 • au~Ied • S sanzer tuo.z; quauzasea abeute.zp a ;o uoi~euoQ • g • eiutb~iA ;o • ouj sutags~Cg uot~etnsuj tuo.z; quauaasea autt .zageM a ;o uot~euoQ • ~ •digs.zauq.zed M'~d pue s.zaMOd •M utnTe~ 's.zaMOa tC.zuag • r ' • ouI uo zPteM ~ ui Te.z3 ~oto.z; ~uamasea ~aMas ~.zegtues pue abeuTe.zp ~.zo~s ;o uot~euoQ •9 ~[ags~Tg 1C.zepuooaS uo~geq.zodsue.zs ;o quau~q.zedaa e~u~bzzp aqq oquF ant.zQ ~CgndaQ pue anz.zQ agebaZ ;o aouegdaooe .zo; gsanbag • 5 •ti# uot~oag 'sa~e~s3 stogoiH pue q.zno~ b.zngs~ueTttTM 'buzn.zas saT~tTtoe; .zaMaS ~C.xe~TueS pue .zageM ;o aoue~daoo~ •~ •~gT~oq~n~ ~ua~dojanaQ Tez.z~snpuj - qua~ttqu~odde aa~~T~au¢o~ ;o uoT~e~uzt;uo~ • ~ ~8Z •oN abpoZ asooy~ ;o iap.zp te~o'I - gT~ad at~3e2i 3o Teno.zdde .zo; ~sanbag • Z 686t ' 6 ~eY~I - sa~nuty~ ;o Teno.zdd~ • t ;~ Q £ 686t ' 6t .zaga[aoaQ •uotgon.zgsuoo p2og quaucdoTanaQ otu:ouoo~ • Z •~Cquno~ axou2og ui sagnog o.zgayl ~ajTEp •T :agon aoton snouziueun E ~Tq paT.Z.ZEO puE 'tiosuuoj' .zostnzadng 1tq papuooas sEM uo~go~u aqy • sq.zoda.z buiMOTto3 auq at~3 puE antaoa.z oq panout suaXotx zosznzadng 'su:agt TE.zanas uo uoissnoszp buiMOtTo3 syxoasx : stt xI • suzags~Cs ~agEM ageni.zd butsEuo.znd ui ssa~bo.zd uo p.zEOq auq pagEpdn biE.z~ P~o33TT~ .zogoa.ziQ ~Tq~jzgn •uo~stntpgns .zzauq oq .zagEM sapino.zd gEuq uags~Ts .zagEM auq asEuo.znd ~Cquno~ aXouEOg gEuq buixsE uoigEtoossE auq uao~3 uotgntosa.z E paquasa.zd 'uo~gEtooss~ s~auMOa~oH pooMaTpi.zg auq buiquasa.zda.z ' Ztaupng uog • T SIdOIyYJIIdf11~II~i00 Qx~ai S00 ~ Si~ZISI~ ~~2i xI auox ~sxYx gga.z.zE~ 'suaXo~x 'tyE.z~oy~ 's.zagog 'uosuuor ~osznzadnS ~S3xK :agon pap,zooa.z bu~MOTTo3 auq ~Cq pa~.z~EO puE 'ME~~oy1 ~os~n.zadng ~Tq papuooas 'suaxo~H ~ostnzadnS 3o uotgoa: up •uoigEgzodsuE.zy 30 quaatq.zEdaQ ETU~b.zTp auq 1~q ~CEMubTu .zo gaa.zgs pTES 3o aouEgdaooE TE~oT33o 3o LiO~gEOT3~gotl .xag3E pue uco~3 ATuo '~Tquno~ axoueo~ u~ StCEMtjbTH 30 ~ags~Tg ~T.tEpuooag agEgg auq 3o q.zEd E au[ooaq oq sp2o.z o~jgnd sE paus~jgEgsa ~Cga.zau a.zE a~uES auq puE 'aq 'uotgntosag s~uq bu~lCuEd~uoooE uogaXs u~Eq.zao E uo uMOgs a.ZE uo~uM puE an~.zp i ~ ~ 686T ' 6T sagwta~aQ 'satTddE uozgntosa.z uoT~EOZ;iq.zao szgq uoigM buT~aana antgnoaxa aq~ ui passnosip a.zaM MET ETLITb~Tn ~Cq squaiua.zTnba.z btlT~aatu uado ~o.z; pa~dutaxa ~TTn;MET s.zaggEn~ ssautsnq oTTgnd ~TTuO •T abpaTMOUX s.zaqu~aaz goEa ;o gsaq auq o~ '~EL;~ sat;tq.zao ~Tga~atj ETUib.ZTA '1CgLinoQ aXoLiEOg ;o s.zostnzadnS ;o p.zEOg aqq qEu~ 'QSA'IOS32I yI 3S SH0332i3Hy 'MOH 'MErj E~LITb.ZTn L;~~M ~~T11LI0;LION ui pagonpuoo sEM bui~aaui antgnoaxa eons ~Eqq ETUTb.ZTA '~IqunoO axouEOg ;o s.zostnzadnS ;o p~EOg aq~ ~Tq uoi~EOt;iq.zao E sa.zTnba.z Ezutb.ztp ;o aPoO auk 3o T' i~i~£-T' Z uoigoaS 'S~i32iSHM puE : qoK uot~EmGZO;uI ;o uiopaa.z3 Eiuibzin aqy ;o suoiszno~d aLjq ggiM aou2p.zoooE ui puE aeon pap.zooa.z antgEtuzi;;E uE oq ~u2ns.znd agEp sitjq uo bui~aaai antgnoaxa uE pauanuoo sEu Eiuib.zin '~C~unoO axouEOg ;o s.zosznzadnS ;o p.zEOg aq~ 'SK32i3HM ~rlxl~xln 30 SQOO SHS H.LIM xSI1~I2i03td00 HI QZ~I SYM 9tdISHS~I SAIZIL7S~CrI JIdI7~IIS2iH0 9t-686TZt IZOIS,f~IOS32I auox :sx~x ~ga.z.zEO 'suaXoTH 'ME.zOoy~ 's.zagog 'uosuuor s~osTn.zadnS :S3xY agon pap.zooa~ butMOTTo; at;~ ~Cq pat.z.zEO puE 's,zagog .zosTn~adnS ~Cq papuooas sEM uoigoui atjy •uotssaS ani~noaxS auq ~;tq.zao puE uoissaS uad0 oq u.zn~a.z oq panoui ~~a.z.zEO .zosTn.zadnS ' • t~ • d p ~ : 5 q~ 9T-686tZt-2i l~IOISS3S SAIJ.fL7~3CZ ~i0 IdOIS~i'JI3Iy2i'30 :S2i HI ` £ 686T ' 6t .zaq~uaaaQ spuaunuooa.z ~IgtQ aXoueog 3T geuq pasznpt au 'Mt.z~oy1 .zosznzadng mo.z3 uozgsanb E oq asuodsa.z uI ' 686T ' 9 Z zagiuaoaQ uo .zaq.ztuo auq uo agon jjTM ~CqT~ axoueog grog pastnpt ~Cauouty~ •.zy1 •oitgnd auq oq aZgtTttnt aq saidoo Mau puE .zaq.ztuo pasodo.zd auq oqut pagt.zodzooui aq sabutuo auq geuq paxst suaxozH ,zostn~adng • .zaq.ztu~ ~Cquno~ aXoutog auq zapun sgstxa ~Ctqua.z.zno utuq .zaq.ztuo ~y~i auq .zapun sjEtai33o paquzodde a.zom~ aq jjTM a~auq grog pasznpt tCauou2yz •~zy~ 'ME.zQoy~ .zostnzadnS oao.z3 uoigsanb t oq asuodsa.z uI • ape~u uaaq ~TTquaoa.z ante grog sabutuo Tt.zanas paMa~na.z osTE ag •.zaq.zEuo auq 3o s.zagdtuo oz3toads auq 3o auaos pagt.zosap 1CauouEy~ • ~y~ • qua~z~anob pasodo.zd auq 3o sTEio~~3o auq put 1Cpoq buzu.zanob auq 3o uotgtsoduzoo auq ' papino.zd s.zaMOd auq ' quat¢u.zano~ utgi Todo~gay~ axoutog auk agt.zod.zoout oq stM .zaq.ztuo auq 3o asodznd auy •uotssas auq 3o dep gs.zi3 auq uo ~Ctquzass~ Tt.zaua~ auq oq paquasa.zd aq gsnuc .zaq.ztuo Cut grog paq.zoda~ dauouty~ tnta ~Cau.zogq~ dquno~ • qua~uaa.zbe pup aaq.zEuo auq bu~gttnvuo3 u~ uo~gtoipap put x.zoM sou .zo; uosuuor ,zosinzadng oq uozge~oa.zddt passa.zdxa gga.z.zt~ uEazzitu~ 066T ' 8Z ~ctys ~Cq q.zno~ gtno.zt~ auq oq pat3iq.zao aq gsnuc qua~uaa.zbt aus •a~uiq qua.z.zno auq oq do panu~quoo suo~gttgobau auq buisinpt 'sta~C gstd auq ;o sa~gznigot auq paMa~na.z 'aaggzu~o~ suotgttgobax butgtpttosuo~ auq 30 .zaqu~au[ t 'uosuuor .zoszn~adng LZ-686ZZt~ snoautZjaas~y~ Put ssaoutu~pip :u~tuoQ quau~~ ;o iawoa ssd~gsuo~gttag ttquamuzanobza~ui ` £ 686T ' 6Z .zaqu~aoaQ puE : quaazu.zano0 uE~itodo.z~ay~ axouEOg aq~ se pai;t~uapz 'quauzu.zanob j2~auab ;o ~TUn E sT L[OTL(M ' ~uautu~anob jEttOTba3 2 O~tiT squautu.zanob ant~oadsa.z .ztauq ;o uot~ep~tosuoo 2 a~En~oa;;a o~ puaquT axouEO21 30 ~qi0 aq~ pu2 axouEOg ;o ~Cquno~ aq~ ' SKS2i3HM puE : ~uautu.zano0 u2gt todo.z~ay~ axou2og auk .zo; ~a~.z2go tE~uaucu~anob 2 ~u2.zb oq ~Ctgtuass~ t2.zaua0 aqq sazzzou~n2 Eiutb~tA 3o aPo~ auk 3o t'St at~Ts 3o Lt .za~deq~ Put 'Eiutb.ztA ;o jEUOt~n~igsuo~ auk ;o Z uoi~oaS ' IIA aToi~.z~ ' S~i32i3HM srt~xu~noo x~slzoaoxss~ ~ox~tox ~ xo~ x~x~xo ~sx~usx~noo ~ ~o os ~rlxloxlA ~o ~z~xo~oo ~ xo.~ aZS~ss~t ~o ~ JxISS~t11Z5~2I Lt-686tZt-2i xOI1,f1ZOS~T2i auoH :sxYx ~ga.z.zE~ 'suaXoTH 'ME.z~ojnj 's.zagog 'uosugor s.zoszn.zadnS :S3x~' agon pap.zooa.z butMOTTo; auk ~Cq paz.z.zeo put 'M2.zOoyZ .zosznzadnS dq papuooas sEM uot~o~u aqy •~Cauog2y~ •~y~ ~iq pau~t~no sabuEuo auk buz~E.zod~oou~ za~.zEuo auq ano.zdd2 0~ panoa[ s.zagog .zosinzadnS ~~ •uo~snTouoo to;ssaoons 2 0~ autoo oq atgE you a.zaM ~nq sanssT asaq~ agouio.zd o~ p~Eu ~ubno; s.zogEigobau aq~ ~Eq~ pasznp2 uosuuor .zostnzadnS ~ga.z.ze~ 's.zagog 'uosugor .zosinxadnS :S1~KN suaxo~H 'Me.zOoy~ s.zosin,zadnS : S3A~ai :agon pap.zooa~ butMOtto; auk ~Cq pa~.z.z2o Put 'suaxo~x .zos~n.zadn~ ~Tq papuooas s2M uoz~o~u aqs • sa~~unoo bu~puno.z.zns ut ~T.zo~i.z.za~ bu~xauuE ~o.z; pa~~q~uo.zd aq jj~M ~ua~ti.ZanoO u2~~Todo.z~ayZ axouEOg L (~ 686t ' 6t .zagtaaoaa 'LZ ~En~ga3 0~ panut~uoo sEM ~sanba.z buzuoza.z sags (' 2i~IdOISIS3d 30 SS3II~ST2I SK SxKQ JCSXIS 2103 Q3IlldI1,AIOJ) ETLITb2TA '~IqunoO axouEOg ;o szosinzadnS ;o pzEOg au'} ;o uoigEOitddE ate uodn suoz~ipuoo ugtM sasodind ~uaiadotanap tEti~snpuT .zo; t-yz o~ t-g ~o~; uotgEOi3tssEto butuoz auq abuEuo oq puE jE~a~snpul tEd~ouzid oq qua~dotanaQ poi; go~.z~stQ tEiia~stbEy~ suittog a~ ui auEZ stoZ ;o ggnos puE psog su~Ttog ;o gsaM pagEOOt sa~oE q5 ~CtagE~ixo~zdds ;o uotgsubtsap dEia ustd asn puEZ amgnd auq pua~E o~ aouEUtpzo u~ 5-68Zt '0661 '£Z ~C.zEnuEr o~ panut~uoo sEM puE past~.zanpE sEM ~T .zap;E uozssTUmto~ buzuuEtd auk 1Cq pa.z.za;ap sEM ~sanba~ butuoza.z sign (' 686t ' S 2iZSW30SQ HO AIOISSII~I00 JIdIIdN~t'Id ~y xg Q~~33Q)•uosXoEr uEtox ;o gsanba~ aim uodn '~OT~~sTQ tETlagsTbEy~ stttg iospuiM auk ui ' p2o2i ttT~I gsisg puE ani~Q tttt~sa.z0 ;o iauzoo gsaMgqnos aqq ~E pa~EOOt 'X.zEd aai;;o uE ganzgsuoo o~ t-g oq £-g poi; saioE ~q•~ dtagssitxozdds auoza~ o~ aouEUtp~o u~ ~--68Zt '0661 '£Z ~C.zEnuEr o~ panut~uoo sEM puE pas~~.zanpE sEM ~~ .zap;E uotsstunuo0 bu~uuEtd aqq ~Tq pa.z.za;ap sEr- ~sanba~ butuoza.z stgs (' 6861 ' S 2i3S~SQ HO NOISSII~II~I00 ORIHt~id Sib xS QS2i2I333Q ) • 1CuEduoO bu~nEd ~tEuds~ EiutbiiA auq ;o gsanbai auq uodn suo~~~puoo ugtr- ' £-~I o~ Z-~-i Qoi; 1C~.aadoid ptES auoza.z o~ pus 'tstigsnpul tsdtouz.zd o~ abETTTA t8~2I poi; 'qo~=~sta ts~~a~stbsy~ bu~idS anE, auq u~ '1~s~iEd abp~g ants ate ;o ~ssa pus psog u~s~unoy~ xong ;o ggnos pagEOOt ~ttsiauab gosi~ aios 60'~Z s ;o uo~gsubtsap dEy~ asp pusZ a~ngn,~ auq pua~s oq aousutpso u~ £-68Zt •.zauot~i~ad aq~ ~Cq uME.zpq~~M sEM ~sanba.z butuoza.z s~uy 6 ~ ~ 6861 ' 6t .zaqutaoaQ ,0£ o~£ 'S PEOg anon u~tM 'aouauq :Etutb.ztA 'dquno~ aXouEOg ;o q.zno~ gtno~t~ auq 3o aot3~0 s~x~aT~ aqq ut '~9~ abed qE 't~~ xooS paaQ ut uMOus sE 's.zantQ auoog Euu~ puE .zautjg ;o dq.zado~d auq o~ ~au.zoo 'p2og anon uo qutod E ~E ~NIAIAII~38 :sMOjjo; sE pagt.zosap eCjTn; a~oat st agEqsa TEa.z ptES gEt{y • ~ •got~~stQ agEgsg jEtquaptsag '~ zapun pa~gtm~zad sash .zaugo jjE but~ot.zgsa.z '1Cq.zadozd auq ;o butuoza.z .zo; ~sanba.z auk ut paggtu~.zad asn 1Cjuo auq butaq stag : asn jEUOS.zad .zo; gdax aq oq sas.zou oMq ;o umn¢txEa~ E MoTjE oq pauoza.z butaq st ~Tq.zado~d auy (T) sgdaooE ~Cga.zau s~ostn.zadnS ;o p.zEOg auq uotuM uotgtpuoo butMOjto; auq buTgT.zM ut pa.za;;o.zd ~Cjt~Equnjon sEu quEOtjddE auk gEuy •E • a.zooy~ aggoj.zEu~ puE sau~Er ;o uotgEOtTddE auq uodn uaxEq st uotgoE slug gEuy •Z •got~gsta agEqsa jEtquaptsag '~ ;o tiOt~E~t;tSSEj~ butuoz auq oq 'got.zgstQ TEt~uaptsag lCjtUiE3 aTbutS 'T2i 3o uotg8ot;tssETo butuoz auq azo.z; pabuEuo ~Cga.zau st 'goi.zgstQ TEt.zagstbEy~ EQMEgE~ auq Lit (SE-Z-TT'9£ .zaqu[nx dEjd xEy) 'Etutb3TA '~Cquno~ axouEOg 'p2og anon y~p9 qE pagEOOj puE 'uta.zau pagt.zosap sE 'sa.zoE EZ • ~ bututEquoo agEqsa jEa.z ;O ~~E~~ LITE~.xa~ E ;O LIOt~E~t;tSSEj~ butuoZ auq ~Euy ' j sMOT jo; sE ' etutb,ztp ' ~Cquno~ axouEOg ;o s.zostnzadnS ;o p.zEOg auq tTq Q3HI~io2i0 yI 3S •MET ~Cq pastnba.z sB paptno,zd ~+ 686T ' 6T .zaquaoao Zi ME.I~JOjnj .zostn.zadnS ~Tq papuooas sEM uotgom[ auy • s.zadotanap am[oq auq ugtM xzoM oq 332gs MottE oq 066t ' £Z tCIEnuEj' oq a~agt auq anutquoo oq panout uosuuor .zostnzadnS 'uotssnostp butMOtto3 •patp uotgou~ auq puE puooas ou sEM a.zauy • aouEUtpzo auq ano.zddE oq panoua q~a.z.zE~ .zostn~adng '~gtttoE3 Ot/05 E papuaumuooa.z puE .zagot.zgs aq ptnous satgtttoE3 uotquagap auq gta3 au pastnpE uosuuor zostn~adnS •sabuEuo pasodo.zd auq oq uotgtsoddo ut axods gaa.zgS ut tXuE.z3 0 ~ ~ £ ' t taMOd pa.z3 tai ' Z • abEUtE.zp 3o quauzano.zduzt puE aouEUaqutE~[ .zo3 xEq dq.zado.zd tEUOS.zad uzo.z3 pagE.zauab anuana.z auq butsn pagsabbns xot.zpaH •.zy~ •.zauMO .zo uOtgEt~OSSE s.zauMOauiou auq 30 ~Cgtttgtsuodsa.z auq au[EOaq uauq qt qnq ~CgtttoE3 uotquagap auq paptno.zd .zadotanap gEuq papuodsa.z abpog •.zy1 •pattEgsut sEM ~CgtttoE3 aqq aouo uotquagap .zo3 atgtsuodsa.z sEM ouM paXsE 'p2og utEqunoy~ XonS 8££~ 'XotPaFi .zagsng •t :ansst slug butp.zEba.z axods suaztgto butMOtto3 auy •satgtttoE3 uotquagap X03 ~tgtttgtsuodsa.z aumssE oq ~Cquno~ auq .zo3 spun3 agEOOtt2 oq ssaoo.zd gabpnq auq but.znp uotssnostp puP 'ssaoo~d teaddE uE 30 quaazusttgEgsa ou '~Qd ug3t3 auq ugtM x.zoM butnutquoo 'a~ztq stag qE uotquagaP Z/Ot 2 butpuaumcooa.z st 33QgS 'uotquagap oq uoEO.zddp tEUOtba.z E buTp.ZEba.z uotsstwroco~ got.zgsto btttuuETd Ltg3t3 aqq ggtM butx.zoM ostE st 33EgS '.z~za~T Z PuE Ot oq uotsuedxa so; butttEo 686t ' 6t .zaqutaoaQ uaaq spq ~uaazast~.zanpp pup aoi~ou TpbaT ' g~'S2i3HM `Pup ~686T '6 .zaq~uanox uo .za~~put siu~ uo but.zpaq oiTgnd p pTau tlozss~unuo0 bututtpla tC~LinoQ aS[oLtpog auk ' SK32i3HM 'Pup ~ 686t '6T .zaqucaoaa uo pTau spM buz.zpaq otjgnd pup butppa.z puooas aq~ Pup '686T 'i~Z .zago~o0 uo ptaq spM aoupuip.zo siuq 3o buippa.z gs.zz3 auk ' S~'S2i3HM Pup ~06-686T x3 X03 upTd uotgo~ quautdoTanaa o~a~ouooS aq~ 3o suo~gppuaunuooa.z aq~ ~uau~aTd~ui oq .zap.zo ui aozgop~d buiuoz pooh pup 'a.zp3TaM tp.zauab 'aouatuanuoo '~C~zssaoau ozjgnd ~Cq pa.ztnba.z sp ~C~uno~ auk 3o sasodznd otjgnd auq anzas oq d~uno0 axoupog ut pagpoot a~pgsa tpa.z uip~.zao 3o suotgpoi3~sspjo auk oq pup upta antsuaua.zd~tto0 auk o~ squau[puauzp pa~pt~iuz 'p~uzb.ztA 'A~uno~ axoupog 30 s.zosinzadnS 3o p.zpog auk ~-68ZT6 uozgntosag ~Cq ' SK32i3HM ~TItdI02iIA ' xS,xC100 S?IOt1rd02i ~rIO S2IOSIA2iSdIIS 30 Q2i~TOH SAy ao xols~riaa~r SELL xoan sxolslaxoo HZIIr! sxs~td0'I3AZa 'I`TI2iySIIaxI ?IOM tai aI0 tdOIyK'JI~IISS@'IO OxItdOZ SILL OZ T2i 30 xOIZ~TJI~IISS~'IO 9xIt~IOZ SHy Jd02L3 J,OI2LLSIa ~ySIJKJ~i 9xI2iaS S;AtoTJ ~ xI Q~i02I SIOxSB CIO axS ~ s~ aS:~~oz SaL~tss~ ~ ~ao s~~r 8~s•ti ao xols~I,~ISS~zo oxlxoz SILL SJxYIiO OZ 6t-686t ZT S:OxKxIa2i0 auox ~~a.z.zpQ 'suaxotH 'typ~0ay~ 's.zagog 'uosuuor saos~n~adnS :sx~x : SSxfl :aeon pap.zooa.z bu~MOjTo3 auk ~Cq pai.z.zpo pup 'ME.zOoy~ .zostnzadnS ~Cq papuooas spM uoi~otu aqy • suo~~~puoo pa.za33o.zd tZ~TM bti~uoza.z auk ano.xddp o~ panoua s.zagog .zos~nzadng •suo~~~puoo aq~ paMa~na.z 6861 ' 61 .zaqu[aoaa ui pa.za~siutuzpE astM.zaggo aq o~ saz,zEpunoq ~Cq,zado.zd u.za~saM auk buotE p.zE~C .za33nq goo3 OOt uzn~uiuiua ~ ( Z ) •sa.zogs paa3 pue paaS (a) puE : s.zosinzadnS 3o p.zEOg aqq 1Cq paque.zb uaaq sEq uoigdaoxa tEioads a ssatun 's~ax.zEy~ EaT3 (p) sp.zE~C puE sun.z .zoz~agxa L;~TM stauuas[ tezo~au~uzoo puE tEgidsou ~C.zEUt~agaA (o) s~onpo.zd oTU~e.zao ,xEjTUtTS .zaugo .zo sau~.znbF3 puE ~C.zaggod 3o bui.zngoE3nuEy~ (q) bui tnEu.zano .zo bui.zi edam xon.zq ' x.zoM .zapua3 puE ~Cpoq 'butuotgipuooa.z 'butptinga.z 'bui.zieda.z 'but~agstoudn 'buiquted attgontogn~ (E) sasn pa~giazzad apntout you ttTM ~Cq,zado.zd aL[y (t) :.zo3 s~daooe ~Cga.zaq s.zostnzadnS 3o p.zeog auq goiuM suoTgtpuoo buzMOtto3 aqq buzgt.zM ut paza33o.zd ~Cti.zEqunton sEu 'agegsa tea.z siuq 30 .zauMO se 'a~a~ouo~ otquEtq~ gees •~ '6861 'SZ .zagogop pagEp s.zolCanznS pue s.zaau~buS ' uog ~ .zax.zed • d • y 1Cq gsnzy • .zS as~.z~ • A • ~i .zo3 getd butuoz uo uMOus se bu~aq pue t-2i pauoz butaq 'sa~oe gg8•Tt bututequoo puet 3o tao.zBd e butaq pue butuutbag 3o qutod aqq oq gaa3 00£ 'M ~ £t 6~ 'H 'Pagt~osap-uta.zaq tCq,zado.zd auk pue ~~.zado.zd s.zosznzadnS 3o p~eog aqq ugiM aouau~ : eiuTb.zTA ' ~Cgccno~ axoueog 3o s,zosin.zadnS 3o p.zeog aqq 30 1Cq.zado~d aqq 3o auit aqq uo g •oH qu~od oq gaa3 ~L't+SST 'M u40 Ott oSE 'S aouauq :L •ox quiod oq gaa3 00'S£t 'M ~Lt otZ 'S 'aunt butuoz p~Es Lj~TM bu~nu~quoo aOUagq :g •ox quTOd oq gaa3 9Z'L9~ 'M ~~LO i4ti o6t 'S 'a~a.zouo0 o~quetq~t 30 ~Cq.zado.zd ' Z-y~ pue t-2i uaaM~aq aunt butuoz aqq buzMOtto3 aouagq :5 •oH qutod oq gaa3 OTT ' 3 ~ tt oL9 ' S 'Pagt.zosap-uia.zaq ~Tq.zado.zd L ~ ~ 6861 ' 6t .zaqutaoaQ puE X06-686T x3 .zo; uETd uot~o~ quaazdoTanaQ oi~ouooS aq~ ;o suoig2puawnuooa.z aq~ ~uauzaTduc~ oq aoi~o2.zd butuoz poob put 'a~E;TaM TE.zauab 'aouatuanuoo '~T~tssaoau oiTgnd ~Cq pa.ztnba.z s2 ~C~uno~ auq ;o sasod~nd ozTgnd auq anzas oq ~TqunoO axoueog ui pa~2ooT a~egsa tEa.z uiE~.zao ;o suoigEOt;tss2jo auq o~ pue u2Td antsuaga.zduzo~ aq~ oq s~uaiupuauzE pa~ei~tu~ ' Etuib.zip ' ~CqunoO axou2og ;o s.zosinzadnS ;o p.zEOg auk ~-68ZT6 uoignTosag ~Tq 'SK32i3HM • ~TIxI J2iIA ' xJ.NIIOO ~IOxKO2i d0 S2iOSIA2T3dIIS 30 Q2i~aTOS ~ aI0 xOIyY'JI'IddK SFLL xOdII SNOIZIQIdOO AyIM SxS~dOZS~Q Z`iI~SIIQIdI 2iO~I Z-~I os ~-~t xoly~I~ISS~to oxlxoz ~ ~IO2L3 yJI2LZSIQ ZtoTI2IISSI9K~i K'HMKSK'J ~L xI x`TM'II~aT2i M'9x ~ QxY ZAI2IQ xTI2i~iH CIO SSSM QxY HyIIOS '09~ QHK TT S3yIIO2I CIO AJ,f1OS Q3yYJOZ Sy~TySS ZK'32I ai0 SAY SZT x'ISaLY~IIXO2idd~i 1I0 xOIyKOI3ISSK'IO JxIt~IOZ ~iy sox~n os OZ-686TZT SOxKxIQ2iO auoH :SxYx ~~a.z.z2O 'suaxoix 'Me.zOoy~ 's~agog 'uosuuor s~osin,zadnS :S3x~i :agon papzooa~ buzMOTTo; aq~ 1Cq pa~~.zEo puE 's~agog .zos~nzadnS tCq papuooas seM uo~~out aqy •suoz~ipuoo ugiM butuoza.z aqq ano~ddE o~ panou: ME.zOoy~ .zostnzadnS •padoTanap si 1C~.zado~d auk uauM a~n~n; auk zo; pauuETd st uo~suEdxa .zaMas auk gEuq pas~npe eTEgnO uty .zo~oa.zto quaa:doTanao o~:uouoo3 'uotsuEdxa .zaMas bu~p.zeba.z Me~Ooy~ .zos~nzadnS uao.z; uo~gsanb B o~ asuodsa.z uI • Ttano.zdd2 papuaaQUaooa.z uoTssTunuoO fi ~ ~ 686T ' 6T .zaq:uaoao sp.ze~C put sunz .zot.zagxa t~gtM sjauuaX teto.zaunuoo pue tegtdsoq ~C.zeut.zagaA (o) sgonpo.zd otuze.zao ~ejtutTS .zaggo .zo saLlT3nbt; put ~C.zaggod ;o but.zngoE;nuey~ (q) :butjneu.zano .zo but.zteda.z xon.zq 'x~oM .zapua; pue 1Cpoq 'butuotgtpuooa~ 'butpttnga.z 'but~teda.z 'but.zagsToudn 'butquted ajtgo~ogn~ (e) :ages stgq qe quam~dojanap 1Cue u~o.z; papntoxa aq ttegs sash butMOtto; aus (t) sgdaooe ~Tga.zaq s.zostn~adnS ;o p.zeog auq uotuM suotgtpuoo butMOTjo; auq butgt.zM ut pa.za;;o.zd ~CTt.zequnjon seq 'agegsa Tea.z stag ;o ~auMO se 'uOtge.ZOdzO, gsaM-tuaTeS geuy • £ •butuutbaq ;o aoejd aqq oq gaa3 Z5'6Z9 'M „£5 ,fit 0L •H aouagq :but.zds qe aa.zq xeo agtgM put ZZ .zau~oo oq qaa; t9' ££~ '3 , L~ , 55 088 •H aouagq :utd uo.zt butgstxa pue tZ .zau.zoa oq 'M u£t ,9t 0£ 'H aouagq :utd uo.zt butgstxa put OZ .zau.zoo oq qaa; ~S • ZS't 'M „St , 6Z 0£8 •x aouagq :aa.zq unb a gbno~gq butssed qaa; S6'9ZZ't 'M „9Z ,9fi 09L 'H aouagq :•M „i~0 ,Sb 069 •H (beus ajde~a) 8t oq aouagq : Lt .zau.zoo oq qaa; 06' Z6t't 'M uL0 , S~ £t ' S uotgoa.ztp ~TT.zagsaM a ut butnutquo~ aouagq :utd uo.zt ue pue 9T .zauzoo ;o q;aj but.zeaq (autj butuoz buoje) qaa; Zi~'Z6t'Z 'S „L5 X55 00T 'S aouagq :qaa; 00'£9Z '3 „£Z ,OZ 0Lt 'H aouagq :qaa; 00'90Z „£Z ,5Z 0£ 'H aouagq :utd uo.zt ue '9Z .zau.zoo oq qaa; t8'£6b't '3 u50 ,9£ bL uotgoa.ztp ~Cj.zagsea ue ut aouagq : (tLt aged '698 xoog paaQ) paseaoap 'sp.zegotg gq.zoMquaM tatueQ ;o ~Tq.zado.zd gqt!"~ pue ~TeM-;o-ggbt.z goo; p5 pies butneat aouagq :utd uo~t ue 'SZ ~au.zoo oq qaa; i+6' L£8 'M uLt , tS 00t 'H autt 1Cjsagq~ou a ut autj gsea agq ggtM butnutquoo aouagq :utd uo.zt ue '~Z .zau~oo oq Tje ut gaa3 t£'t56 '3 u6~ , 6£ 098 'H uotgoa~ztp ~CT.zagsea ue ut ~TeM-;o-ggbt~ pies ;o autT gqnos aqq ggtM aouagq :sp.zegotg gq.zoMquaM tatueQ ggtM .zau.zoo uounuoo a bu~aq 'osje pue ~Cer,-;o-ggbt~ goo; 05 a 3o autT gqnos aqq ggtM .zau.zoo uounuoo aqq butaq pue au aoua3 pto ue ut ~+ 686t '6t ~aquaoap uaaq seu quan:astq~anpe pue aoigou TebaT ' Srd32iSHM 'Pue ~ 686T 'S .zaquzaoaQ uo ~a~~eiu siu~ uo but~eaq otTgnd e pTau tIOTSSTwtutO~ buTULlejd ~CqunoO as[otzeog auq ' S~~Sg(y 'pue ~686T '6I ,zagaraoaQ uo pTau seM but.zeau oiTgnd pue butpea.z puooas auk pue ' 686T `8Z .zagiuanoH uo pTau seM aoueuip.zo siuq ;o buzpea.z gs.zt; auk ' S~i~i3HM pue X06-686T 1~3 X03 ueTd uoz~o~ quau:doTanaa o~uouooS auq ;o suozgepuaa¢ucooa.z auq quaa:aTduzi oq .zap.zo ut ao~goe.zd buiuoz poob pue 'a.ze;jar- je.zauab 'aouatuanuoo '~Cgzssaoau o~Tgnd ~Tq pa.zinbaz se ~CqunoO auq ;o sasodznd oiTgnd aqq an.zas oq ~CqunoQ axoueog u~ pa~eooT a~egsa tea.z uze~.zao ;o suoigeoi;isseTo aqq oq pue ueTd an~suaua.zduto0 auq o~ squauzpttauze pageTgiut 'eTtlTb.zTA '~Cquno~ axoueog ;o s.zosin.zadnS ;o p.zeog auq ~-68ZT6 uot~nTosag ~Cq 'S~i32iSHM KIxIO -2IIA ' xJ.NA00 ~UIOxK02i PTO S?IOSIA2IIdIIS ~ao a~ros s~ ao xoly~IZaa~ s~ xoan sxolslaxoo H.LIM yxs~raoZS~a 'I~Ixssnaxl xoa zK ~ao xols~Ialss~o 9xItdOZ ~L OZ TK CIO xOISYJ -I~IISS@'IO JxINOZ S~ ~I02IrI ~I2LLSIa 'IYI2iSSSIJK~i SxI'IrIOH 8~ xI aSSKJOZ iZL~iZSZ 'I`i'32i CIO SDK 6t x'IZSYI~IIX02id -d~T rI0 xOIS@JI~IISS@'IO 9xItdOZ ~ ~ox~ OS TZ-686TZT SOx~rxIa2I0 uosuuor .zos~nzadnS :AIIKySSY auox :SxKH gga.z.zeo 'suaxo~x 'Me.zOoy~ 's~agog s.zostn.zadnS : S3x~i :agora pap.zooa.z bu~MOjTo; auk dq pa~.z.zeo pue 'Me.zOoy~ .zosinzadnS 1Cq papuooas seM uo~~o~u auy ~` ~+ £ 686T ' 6t iaqu[aoaQ bLtt~T.zM u~ pa.za33o~d dji.zequnton an2t; 'a~e~sa t2a.z sTtt~ 3o s.zauMo sE 'ueiu33nH 'H tazeH put uEUZ33nH 'S puotulCeg ~Eqy ' 4 '6861 'SZ ~ago~oO pa~2p ' uE~u33nH ' H jazeH PuE ' S puouc~Ceg .zo3 •ouI 'sa~Eiooss~ ~ .zazteg ~Cq ~Etd uo uMOus sE sa.zoE 9 Z9 • g btiTUTE~tiOO pLiE butuuzbaq 30 ~uTOd aqq o~ ,00'09L 'M o50 X65 o8Z 'H pa~e.zod.zoouI 'd~I6' 3o autj ~s2a auk put uEUZ33nH pt2s t,~~TM aoczaq~ :uTd uo.zt u2 0~ , £6'tLE 'M u55 X00 ot9 'S uE~33nH 'H tazeH put •g puouc~C2g 30 ~Cq.zado.zd auk gbno.zq~ aunt t xaa.z~ s, uznze~ buineat aouagq :~uTOd E o~ ,tL'i~Z£ '3 u0t X60 Z£ 'S s~uiod 2 0~ ,6Z'0£ '3 ~~t~0 ~8Z t0 'S 9~LITOd E O~ ,06'ZOZ '~ u£~ ~Z£ o5Z 'S ~~LtTOd E oq ,8t'85Z 'S o0t ~Z~+ 08£ 'S :sas.znoo buiMOtto3 aqq xaa.z~ s, uinze~ 3o auiT.za~uao auk u~iM aouau~ : Xaa.z~ s, uinze~ 30 .za~uao aqq u~ ~uiod 2 0~ , ~8' 86 'S ~i0t ~ ZO ot9 'H s.za~Cy~ •g ~IuueQ 3o autj u~nos aqq q~tM pue aueZ d~uspuai.z3 bu~n2aj aouaq~ :~u~od a o~ ,55'ZbZ '3 utiZ ~~£ 06~ 'H au2Z d~gspuaz.z3 3o apts i;~nos att~ q~iM aouau~ (5tt a~nog ETLITb~T[~) p2og uOT~E~uEjd 30 ~s2a ~,OOi~t (568t a~nog ~C.z2pctooaS ETUjb.zTA) au2''j dtuspuat.z3 3o apis u~nos aqq uo uid uo.zt u2 ~e butuuzbag puE '686t '9Z .zago~op pa~Ep 'uEaz33nH 'H taZeH PuE 'S puoauTEg .zo3 •ouI sa~eiooss~ '~ .zazteg ~Cq g2td uo uMOgs s2 sa.zoE 6fii£'tt buiu~2~uoo put butuutbaq 30 ~u~od aqq o~ ,LL'68ti qE utd uo.zz uE bussed i9b•ggtt 3o aouE~s~p tE~o~ e ' ' M ~~ ~ £ ~ 00 0O £ ' H uo~~2.zod.zo, udE.zbatay pue auoudatay Teuo~geu.za~uI put •auI 'uauz~C.z~eQ 3o autt sea auk pue uEat33nH pies q~iM aouau~ :u~d uo.zz ue o~ ,9t't5 'M ut£ DLO obg •S :utd uo.z~ ue oq ,0'9£4 'M ut£ ~LZ o6L •S :sas.znoo bu~MOtto3 auk ~esaQ •g gsa~eg 30 autt q~.zou auk pue ue~33nH pies u~~r~ aouau~ :u~d uo~~ ue o~ ,99'L94 '3 u6Z ~6t o8Z 'S ue~33nH 'H tezeH pue •g puout~Ceg 3o eCq.zado.zd aqq gbno.zu~ aouaq~ t~u~od a o~ ,9L't54 '3 ..6£ ~Z£ o5Z 'S u2uc33nH •H e~u~u~~ Pue 'H uuor 30 auit ~saM auk u~~M aouaq~ s~u~od a o~ ,50't4 '3 u6£ ~Z£ o5Z 'S :~u~od 2 0~ X89'6£ '3 u6£ ~Z£ oL4 'S :~u~od a o~ ,95'££ 'S u6Z ~L4 o££ •S :sas.znoo bu~MOjto3 aqq ~CeM-3o-~ub~.z .OZ Pies 3o au~t.za~uaa aqq buote aouaq~ ~ r ~ 686t ' 6t .zaq~aaoao a t E qou pLIE q.zo33a tj~TE3 poob E sEM sTtjq pasinpE sctaxoTx .zostn.zadng 'uosugor .zosinzadng uto.z3 uoigsanb E oq asuodsa.z uI 'ME.zoOy~j .zosinzadng ~Tq papuooas sEM uozgouz aus •pagFnazj asiM.zaugo .zo papnToa.zd aq qou jTEgs sat~tjEOOj auk uaaM~aq quaroaaa.zbE ~Cq abuEgo .zo uoi~EOOTa.z auzj dzEpunoq E butu.zaouoo tlogLt~A 3o uMOy auq puE ~C~uno~ axoueog uaaMgaq suoi~Ei~obau .zau~.zn~ ~CuE 'sdzgsuotgETa.z puE sa.zngonzgs ~uauzu.zano~ jEOOZ uo uotsstanuo~ aqq ~o suoigEpuantutooa.z aq o~ quEns.znd ~Tjqucass~ jE.zaua~ Eiuzb.zzp aqq 3o uotssas 066T auk 1~q pa~dopE aq ICEUI LjoTL;M LIOT~Ejstbaj pasodo.zd bLiTpuE~SLj~TM~OLi gEgq panou~ suaXoix .zosTA.zadng •uotgEjstbaj uoissimnuo~ uos~TE.zS auq o~ p.zEba.z ~noq~iM 066T 'T ~C.zEnuEr ~ag3E quauz~snCpE ~C.zEpunoq buiu.zaouoo anboTEZp anutquoo oq ajgE aq pTnous axouEOg ;o ~Cquno~ puE uoquin 3o uMOs aqq qEq~ ~Ta3 ag •agon uoT~EpTTosuoo auq 3o a~uoo~no aqq 3o ssaTp.zEba.z 'autzq s~qq q2 uoquin ;o uMOs au~} L;~tM buT~ETjT33E ut ~sa.za~ut passa.zdxa anEq oqM uots~nipgns auo ui sua2tgia 30 .zaqumu E a.ZE a.zau~ qEq~ pas~npE suaXotx .xosinzadng xosxln ~o xMOS ~.t x0 SJ,~S3~IS SSI Qx`T x'IS~IISSY 'IY2ISxZ~ 3HZ xI xOIS~dZSIJ~I : S2I xI uosuuor .zosinzadnS : NI~'ZSS~at auox :sxKx gga.z.zE~ 'suaxo~x 'ME.Z'~Oy~j 's~agog .zos~nzadnS : S3xY :agon pap.zooa.z bu~MOTjo3 aqq dq pa~.z.zEO puE 'ME~~oy~ ,zos~n~adng 1Cq papuooas 'pagaTap L ~ ~ 686T ' 6T iaq~caoaa ~~ w March 27, 1990 ~ n Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Roanoke County Administration Center 3738 Brambleton Avenue, S.W. Roanoke, Virginia 24018 March 27, 1990 The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, met this day at the Roanoke County Administration Center, this being the second Tuesday, and the second regularly scheduled meeting of the month of March, 1990. IN RE: CALL TO ORDER Chairman Robers called the meeting to order at 3:05 p.m. The roll call was taken. MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman R. W. Robers, Vice Chairman Steven A. McGraw, Supervisors Lee B. Eddy, Bob L. Johnson, Harry C. Nickens MEMBERS ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator; John M. Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator for Human Services; John R. Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator of Community Services and Development; Don M. Myers, Assistant County Administrator for Management Services; Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney; Mary H. Allen, Clerk; Anne Marie Green, ' Information Officer, Brenda J. Holton, Deputy Clerk ~~ ~ 5 March 27, 1990 IN RE: OPENING CEREMONIES The invocation was given by the Reverend Branan G. Thompson, Colonial Avenue Baptist Church. The Pledge of Allegiance was recited by all present. IN RE: NEW BOSINE88 1. Request to continue the Community Service Program. D. Keith Cook, Director, Human Resources, introduced Lynn Reeves, Coordinator for the Program, Teresa Childress, Clerk, General District Court and Rosemary Walker Smith, In-Take Counsellor for the J&D Court. He advised that the community service program was approved in August, 1989 for a six month trial period. The program has proven to be very successful with the benefits exceeding the expenditure of funds. Although $9,950 has been requested for FY 1990-91 in the Human Resources Budget, Mr. Cook requested the board approve funding in the amount of $1,326 to cover the program expenses for the remainder of FY 1989-90. In response to questions from Supervisor Eddy about the program's effectiveness, Mr. Cook described several case histories and advised that all comments from everyone involved have been very positive. Supervisor Nickens questioned why this additional money was needed since in August the board appropriated $5,800 for this program March 27, 1990 ~9 6 expen i ures roug a ruary were 2,097. Mr. Cook requested time to review the staff report and advise the board later in the meeting. 2. Request from the School Board for acceptance of Grant Funds for an Alcohol and Druq Abuse Assistance Program. ~--32790-1 Mr. Jack Liddy, Roanoke County School Supervisor of Health and P.E. advised that a $17,960 grant for a period of one year has been received from the Governor's Council on Alcohol and Drug Abuse to establish a program at the secondary school level for students residing in the Glenvar and Northside School Districts. There is no matching funds requirement from the County. Supervisor Johnson pointed out that the one-year grant could create on-going expenses on an annual basis although he felt it was a valuable service, and questioned whether an additional person might have to be added. Mr. Liddy advised that they hope to provide a certified counselor in each area of the county, and the major problem is that all areas of the County are not covered. The program will begin immediately and the grant runs from January to December. Until the money is appropriated, they will be using hourly employees. Supervisor Nickens asked why this request was also on the -. school add-back list. Mr. advised that this grant was only for the balance of this school year and does not go beyond that. Supervisor Robers asked about results of the program and Mr. 9 ~ March 27, 1990 s a s ics avai a e u cou ma e - a presentation to the board at a later date. Supervisor Nickens restated his observation that whether phrased over a three year period or done all at one time, ultimately the grant funding will run out. Although the program is important enough to be funded, three new positions could be added to the on-going operating budget of the schools over the phase in period. Supervisor Nickens moved to approve the staff recommendation. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None 3. Request for approval to construct the Brookwood/Hidden Valley Water System Protect. A-32790-2 Cliff Craig, Director of Utilities, requested approval of the construction of the Bridlewood/Hidden Valley Water System which would be funded with $175,000 from funded depreciation and $200,000 from the off-site facility fund. He advised that this project would be the best method to provide adequate fire protection, and water service to the Mt. Vernon, Highfields, Layman Lawn, Bridlewood and Brookwood areas and adequate water service for orderly development along Route 221. Mr. Craig recommended that the Board authorize the acquisition of the reservoir property at an amount not to exceed the assessed valuation, and the required easements not to exceed 40$ of the assessed March 27, 1990 X98 va ua ion. Supervisor Eddy inquired about the cost of the acquisition of land and easements. Mr. Craig replied that would be negotiated but the cost for one-half acre could be $5,000, and a little higher for a tank site. He estimated that the cost would be less than $20,000 for all of the easements. In reply to Supervisor Eddy's question about citizen opposition, Mr. Craig advised that there has been no concern or opposition because of the very poor water available and lack of fire protection in the area. A discussion followed of long-range planning to develop efficient water systems, and possible changes to the ordinance to require greater testing and compliance from developers. Supervisor Johnson restated the need for a work session to look at the Comprehensive Plan. Supervisor Eddy amended his motion to approve the request to include Item D-4. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None 4. Rewest for avproval to construct the Starkey Road Aater System Project. A-32790-3 See discussion under Item 3 above. Supervisor Eddy moved to approve the request. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: 19 9' March 27, 1990 AYES: upervisors y, c raw, o nson, is ens, o ers NAYS: None ~, authorization to participate in the Virginia Department of Transportation Revenue Sharinq Proqram. ~i-32790-4 County Administrator Elmer Hodge advised that the Commonwealth of Virginia provides $5,000,000 for a matching program with participants limited to a match of $500,000. He requested approval to submit a letter of intent to participate in the program. Upon a determination of the funds allocated to Roanoke County, a list of projects will be identified and presented. There was no discussion. Supervisor Nickens moved to approve the request. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None IN RE: ITEM D.1 - REQIIEST TO CONTINIIE THE COMMIINITY SERVICE PROGRAM Mr. Hodge advised that the staff report would be brought back at a later date and requested it be received as a report. Supervisor Nickens moved that the staff report be received as an informational report and the motion carried by unanimous voice vote. IN RE: REQIIESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS Supervisor Eddy requested that a work session on Water March 27, 1990 2 0 0 onnec ion Fees a sc e u e after the budget process is complete. He recommended that the work session be combined with long-range water plans. IN RE: REQIIESTS FOR PIIHLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING FOR REZONING ORDINANCE - CONSENT AGENDA Supervisor Nickens moved to approve the first readings and set the second reading and public hearings for April 24, 1990. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None 1. An ordinance rezoning 51 62 acres from M-2 to R-1 for the purpose of allowing the development of a residential subdivision. located off Route 939 (Aerospace Rd.) in the Vinton Magisterial District, uvon the rewest of Aerospace Research Corporation. 2. An ordinance to rezone approximately 7.64 acres from A- 1 to B-2 for general office use, located north of Plantation Road in the Hollins Magisterial District, upon the request of Dominion Bankshares, Inc. 3. An ordinance to rezone a 2.25 acre parcel from B-2 iJ ~ - March 27, 1990 on i ona o - on i iona en men o ro ers - for the puraoses of constructing a retail drive through window located at 4515 Brambleton Avenue in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District, upon the Detition of Sorinawood Associates. 4. An ordinance issuing a Use Not Provided for Permit allowing a series of 16 weekly summer concerts at Vallemointe, near the intersection of Peters Creek Road and Valleypointe Blvd in the Hollins Magisteria_1 District, upon the request of the Easter Seal Society of Virginia. IN RE: FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance authorizing the accevtance and acquisition of surplus real estate Parcels 044 and 074, Cave Spring Junior High School Site) from the Roanoke County School Board and authorizing the same to the Commonwealth of Virginia. Supervisor Eddy recognized that representatives of the School Board were present to answer any questions. There was no discussion. Supervisor Johnson moved to approve the first reading and set March 27, 1990 202 - n rea inq or pri T e motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None IN RE: REPORTS l1ND INQUIRIES OF BOARD KEMBERS SUPERVISOR EDDY: (1) Solicited the board's comments on re- arranging the community room. The consensus of the board was not to move forward. (2) Again asked the board to consider changing the ordinance that requires a deposit for utility re-connection for a first time offender. (3) Asked Paul Mahoney to comment on the model charter seminar that he attended in North Carolina at Mr. Eddy's request. (4) Reported on the Vinton Chamber of .Commerce annual dinner meeting which he attended. SUPERVISOR MCGRAW: Described the results of a community meeting in the Catawba Valley regarding changes in minimum lot acreage in rural areas. SUPERVISOR JOHNSON: Asked Chairman Robers for a proposed position and timetable to the response of Roanoke City to suggested changes to the consolidation agreement. Supervisor McGraw moved that the Chairman be authorized to discuss with the city representatives the potential changes to the consolidation X03 March 27, 1990 p an an repor ac o e oar y AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Robers NAYS: Supervisor Johnson, Nickens ~OPBRVISOR NICICENB: Expressed concern about the recreation clubs being asked for liability coverage by April 1st and the inconsistency with other agencies using county facilities. Mr. Hodge agreed to extend the deadline to April 10th and bring back a staff report at that time. SUPERVISOR ROBERB: Reported on the presentation at the Congress Surface Transportation Subcommittee regarding the "smart highway" and request for funding. IN RE: APPOINTMENTS i. League of Older American Supervisor Robers advised that he had talked with Webb Johnson about re-appointment to this committee, and would like to keep the appointment open until Mr. Johnson responds. 2. Landfill Citizens Advisory Committee Supervisor Robers questioned whether this committee should be put on inactive status. Mr. Hodge and Supervisor McGraw recommended that the committee be kept active until after the new landfill is operational. 3. Transportation and Safety Commission Supervisor Eddy nominated William G. Rosebro, as Medical March 27, 1990 2 0 ~ _ _ -year erm. IN RE: CONSENT AGENDA R-32790-5 Supervisor Johnson moved to approve the resolution with Item 1 removed for a separate vote. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None Supervisor Johnson moved to approve Item 1. carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None ABSTAIN: Supervisor Eddy RESOLIITION 32790-5 APPROVING AND CONCIIRRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SIIPERVISORB AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM L - CONSENT AGENDA The motion BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. that the certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for March 27, 1990, designated as Item L - Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 4, inclusive, as follows: 1. Approval of Minutes - August 22, 1989 ~, 0 5 March 27, 1990 2. Approval of Minutes - February 27, 1990 3. Request to approve changes in Secondary System due to relocation and realignment of Poor Mountain Road (Route 612 ) 4. Request for acceptance of Cedar Edqe Road in the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System. 2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this resolution. RESOLIITION 3279.0-S.a REQOESTiNG CHANGES IN BECONDARY SYSTEM DUE TO RELOCATION AND CONSTRUCTION OF POOR MOIINTAIN ROAD (ROUTE 612) BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That this matter came this day to be heard upon the proceedings herein, and upon the application of a portion of Poor Mountain Road (Route 612) which was relocated and reconstructed under VDOT Project 0612-080-P18, N501; 2. That it appears to the Board of Supervisors that Secondary Route 612, from north of the intersection with Route 78.6 to south of the intersection of Route 916 for a distance of 0.28 miles, has been altered; a new road has been constructed and approved by the State Transportation Commissioner, which new road serves the same citizens as the road so altered; and these changes are shown on the attached sketch titled "CHANGES IN SECONDARY SYSTEM DUE TO RELOCATION AND CONSTRUCTION ON ROUTE 612, PROJECT 0612-080-P18,N501, dated at Richmond, March 27, 1990 Z 0 6 rginia, u y . 3. That the portion of Secondary Route 612, i.e., Section No. 1, for a distance of 0.11 miles be, and hereby is, added to the Secondary System of State Highways, pursuant to Section 33.1-229 of the Code of Virginia, as amended. 4. That the section of old location, i.e. Section No. 2, for a total distance of 0.28 miles, be, and hereby is, abandoned as a public road, pursuant to Section 33.1-155 of the Code of Virginia, as amended. On motion of Supervisor Johnson, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None RESOLIITION 32790-S.b REQIIESTING ACCEPTANCE OF CEDAR EDGE ROAD INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That this matter came this day to be heard upon the proceedings herein, and upon the application of Cedar Edge Road, from its south intersection with Forest Edge Drive to its North intersection with Forest Edge Drive, for a distance of 0.45 mile, to be accepted and made a part of the Secondary System of State Highways under Section 33.1-229 of the Virginia State Code. 2. That it appears to the Board that drainage easements and a 2 Q ~ March 27, 1990 dedicated by virtue of a certain map\maps known as Forest Edge Section 2 Subdivision which map was recorded in Plat Book 10, Page 69, of the records of the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, on June 30, 1987 and that by reason of the recordation of said map no report from a Board of Viewers, nor consent or donation of right- of-way from the abutting property owners is necessary. The Board hereby guarantees said right-of-way for drainage. 3. That said road known as Cedar Edge Road and which is shown on a certain sketch accompanying this Resolution, be, and the same are hereby established as public roads to become a part of the State Secondary System of Highways in Roanoke County, only from and after notification of official acceptance of said street or highway by the Virginia Department of Transportation. On motion of Supervisor Johnson, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None IN R8: REPORTS Supervisor Nickens moved to receive and file the following reports. The motion carried by a unanimous voice vote. AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None March 27, 1990 2 Q 8 api a n nappropria a Ba ance 2. General Fund Unappropriated Balance 3. Board Contingency Fund 4. Income Analysis and Statement of Expenditures for eight months ended February 28, 1990. 5. Update on Police Department Transition IN RE: RECE88 Chairman Robers declared a five minutes recess at 4:24 p.m. IN RE: BUDGET WORK 8E88ION Mr. Hodge advised that since the last budget session, he and Dr. Wilson met on several occasions in order to balance the budget. They looked at achieving operational efficiencies by possibly combining the Health Care Program, Workman's Compensation, and the Finance Operations. He introduced Dr. Wilson to explain some of the budget cuts. Dr. Wilson recalled that the budget was $237,000 out of balance before the addition of the recordation taxes of $157,000. The teachers' 5.2$ raise will be kept in order to meet the mandate, but other employees salary increase will be reduced to 5$. In order to put back eight teacher aides, the personal leave day was eliminated. The summer school remedial program was reduced and the health insurance benefits were reduced although the insurance rates are still unknown. The total budget for the school operations will be up 6.4$. Dr. Wilson advised that there is a possibility of consolidation of insurance but he does not feel that efficiency could be increased by combining the finance operations. 2 O ~ March 27, 1990 upervisor o ers s a e a e oar s ou con inua y look at ways to consolidate duplication of functions such as the finance department. Supervisor Nickens asked what the savings were from reducing the non-instructional salaries to 5.0$ and the amount saved on insurance. Dr. Wilson responded that the salary amount was $26,000 and $115,000 for the insurance and the schools would reduce the amount paid per employee to stay within the budget. Dr. Wilson advised that there are several areas that the school system and the county are working on together and these were reviewed recently by Mr. Hodge, and Supervisors Nickens and Eddy. Supervisor Johnson stated that he did not like elimination of the teacher personal leave day and expressed concern about reducing the insurance rate. He felt that any function not affecting students should be handled by County personnel. He recommended a meeting between representatives from the Board and the School Board to discuss cost savings. Supervisor McGraw moved that Supervisor Johnson and Supervisor Robers meet with the School Board in the same capacity as discussed and look at any final potential savings prior to the School Board's actions on Thursday. After discussion, Supervisor McGraw amended his motion that Supervisor Johnson and Supervisor Robers be authorized to further investigate the School Board Budget to find potential cost savings for recommendation to the Board during the budget process. The motion was carried by unanimous voice vote. . March 27, 1990 Z , O Supervisor Eddy nquired about the Adult Education item of $116,000 and why the fees could not be raised to cover the full cost. Dr. Wilson replied that the program is self-sustaining from the fees and the state money, with no local money. In response to a question from Supervisor Eddy, Dr. Wilson and Dr. Hardy described the teachers' pay plan. Supervisor Eddy asked how the School Board was approaching the capital needs in next year's budget and inquired about a suggested list of projects to be financed by a General Obligation Bond Issue mentioned at the last meeting. Dr. Wilson replied that capital improvements will be discussed in detail on April 10th with the Board. Supervisor Nickens expressed concern at the unfunded emergency items. Dr. Wilson responded that the VPSA money borrowed last fall will pay for some projects. Supervisor McGraw expressed concern at the $88,000 reduction for personnel items. Supervisor McGraw and Supervisor Johnson felt it was important to find the money to fund these items. IN RE: RECESS Supervisor Robers declared a dinner recess at 5:10 p.m. , there being no executive session. EVENING SESSION (7:00 P.M.) IN RE: PUBLIC HEARING AND SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES '21 1 March 27, 1990 390-1 Aa Ordinanc• to amend the Future Land Use Kap designation of a 53.44 acre tract from Development to Principal Industrial and to rezone said property from R-E to M-i for industrial development, located east of West Ruritan Road and north of Homestead Lane, Hollins Magisterial District upon the request of the Roanok• County Board of Bupervisors.(CONTINUED TO MAY 22, 1990 AT REQUEST OF TH8 PETITIONER.) CONTINUED TO 5/22/90 390-2 Ordinance amending the Roanoke County Zoainq Ordinance by adopting a new set of Zoning Regulations pertaining to the display of signage within Roanoke County, and repealing or amending certain existing zoning regulations pertaining to the display of signs.(CONTINIIED TO APRIL 24, 1990 AT REQUEST OF COUNTY BTAFF) CONTINUED TO 4/24/90 390-3 Ordinance requesting a vacation of portions of two slope easements, located on Lots 20, 21 and 22, Block 2, Section 2 and Lot 31, Block 2, Section 2, Fairway Forest Estates, in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District. 0-32790-6 The staff report was presented by Arnold Covey, Director, Development and Inspections. There was no discussion. Supervisor Eddy moved to approve the ordinance. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None ORDINANCE 32790-6 VACATING PORTIONS OF TWO SLOPE EASEMENTS VARYING LOCATED ON LOTS 20, 21, AND 22, BLOCK 2, SECTION 2, AND LOT 31, BLOCK 2, BECTION 2, FAIRWAY FOREST ESTATES, WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DIBTRICT March 27, 1990 ~ ~ 2 WHEREAS, F.F.E. Development Corporation has requested the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia to vacate two slope easements located on Lots 20, 21, and 22, Block 2, Section 2, and Lot 31, Block 2, Section 2, Fairway Forest Estates, Windsor Hills Magisterial District; and WHEREAS, Section 15.1-482 (b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, requires that such action be accomplished by the adoption of an ordinance by the governing body; and, WHEREAS, notice has been given as required by Section 15.1-431 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and a first reading of this ordinance was held on March 13, 1990; and the second reading of this ordinance was held on March 27, 1990. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That two slope easements located on Lots 20, 21, and 22, Block 2, Section 2 and Lot 31, Block 2, Section 2, Fairway Forest Estates, Windsor Hills Magisterial District, of record in the Roanoke County Circuit Court Clerk's Office in Plat Book 10, page 122, be, and hereby are, vacated pursuant to Section 15.1-482(b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended; and, 2. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. 3. That F.F.E. Development Corporation shall record a certified 2 ~ ~ March 27, 1990 our an s a pay all fees required to accomplish this transaction. On motion of Supervisor Eddy, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None 390-4 An ordinance granting a IIse Not Provided for Permit for an open afr market located at 3704 Brambleton Avenue in the Cave Spring Magisterial District, upon the request of E. 8. Carter. 0-32790-7 Staff report was presented by Planner Jonathan Hartley. There are no significant impact factors, no citizen opposition to the request and no proffers were made. The petition was approved unanimous by the Planning Commission. There was no discussion. Supervisor Eddy moved to approve the ordinance granting a Use Not Provided for Permit on a permanent basis. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None ORDINANCE 32790-7 AIITHORIZING A DSE-NOT-PROVIDED- FOR PERMIT TO OPERATE AN OPEN AIR MARKET LOCATED AT 3704 BRAMBLETON AVENGE IN THE CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT OPON THE APPLICATION OF E. E. CARTER WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on February 27, 1990, and the second reading and public hearing was held March 27, March 27 , 1990 2 , 4 -. an , WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on March 6, 1990; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That a use-not-provided-for permit for a certain tract of real estate containing .35 acre, as described herein, and located at 3704 Brambleton Avenue, (Tax Map Number 77.13-3-1) in the Cave Spring Magisterial District, is hereby authorized. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of E. E. Carter. 3. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: Lot 1, Section 4, of Mount Vernon Heights as shown on a plat made by T. P. Parker, S.C.E., dated March 23, 1967, of record in Plat Book 2, page 67 in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court for the County of Roanoke, Virginia, and containing .35 acre. 4. That the effective date of this ordinance shall be March 27, 1990. On motion of Supervisor Eddy, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None 390-5 An ordinance to rezone a 1.83 acre parcel from B- 1 Conditional to B-1 Conditional (Amendment of Signage Proffers), located on Route 419, adjacent to Sugar Loaf Farms and Grander Park, in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District, upon the request of Hong 1Ci Min. 2 ~ ~ _ March 27, 1990 The staff report was presented by Mr. Hartley. The petitioner is requesting to amend the previous signage proffer of 25 sq. ft. to 156.6 sq. ft. and proffered that the signage would not exceed 12'10" in height and 85 sq. ft in area. Under the current ordinance, 547 sq. ft. of signage would be permitted. There was no citizen opposition to the request at the Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval. Supervisor Nickens asked about response to a letter from Sandra Rosebro about the fence not being erected and that the original site plan and proposed style of the building discussed with the neighbors were discarded after the rezoning was approved. Mr. Hartley replied that the fence has been erected beyond the agreement and that the proffered condition only committed the petitioner to meet with the neighbors not to implement their suggestions. Supervisor Nickens felt that in the future, the credibility of the board would be compromised if proffers were subject to misunderstandings. Supervisor Eddy stated that three items on the agenda dealt with the size of signage and amending original proffers. He suggested that conditions covering signage should be addressed prior to rezoning so amendment would not be necessary. There were no citizens requesting to speak. Supervisor Eddy moved to approve the ordinance. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None March 27, 1990 2 ~ 6 ORDINANCE 32790-8 TO AKEND PROFFERED CONDITIONS ON THE REZONING OF A 1.83 ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED ON ROIITE 419 ADJACENT TO BIIGAR LOAF FARMS AND GRANDER PARK IN THB AINDSOR HILLS 1riAGIBTERIAL DISTRICT FROIri THE 80NING CLASSZFICATION OF B-i, CONDITIONAL, TO THE 80NING CLASSIFICATION OF 8-1, CONDITIONAL (AMENDMENT TO BIGNAGE BROFFERB) IIPON THE APPLICATION OF HONG 1CI MIN WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on February 27, 1990, and the second reading and public hearing was held March 27, 1990; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on March 6, 1990; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law; and WHEREAS, this property was rezoned from R-1, Residential District, to B-1, Business District with proffered conditions, on December 10, 1985. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing approximately 1.83 acres, as described herein, and located on Route 419 adjacent to Sugar Loaf Farms and Grander Park in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of B-1, Conditional, to the zoning classification of B- 1, Conditional with amended proffered conditions. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of Hong Ki Min. L 1 7 - March 27, 1990 3. T at t e app scant as voluntarily proffered in writing the following amendment to Proffer #11 of the conditions approved by the Board of Supervisors on December 10, 1985, which the Board of Supervisors hereby accepts: (1) Signage shall not exceed 12' 10" in height and 85 square feet in area (156.6 square feet overall area). All other proffers and conditions would remain in full force. 4. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: BEGINNING at a point on the northerly side of Virginia State Secondary Route 419, on the line with the property of Sugar Loaf Farms, Inc., said point designated as A5 on that certain plat dated December 6, 1965, made by C. B. Malcolm & Son, S.C.E., showing the remaining property of G. E. McDaniel; thence with the line of the property of Sugar Loaf Farms, Inc., S. 46° 27' W. 314.46' to a point designated as A4 on the aforesaid map, said point being the northwesterly corner of Lot 1, Block 1, Map of Grander Park, said plat recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court for the County of Roanoke, Virginia, in Plat Book 3, page 282; thence with the line of Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Map of Grander Park, S. 62° 21' E. 148' to a point designated as A3 on the aforesaid McDaniel plat; thence continuing with the line of Lots 3, 4 and 5, Block 1, Map of Grander Park, S. 70° 41' E. 232' to a point designated as A2 on the aforesaid McDaniel plat; thence continuing with the line of Lot 5, Block 1, Map of Grander Park, S. 89° 11' E. 69.30' to a point designated as Al on the aforesaid McDaniel plat, said point being on the westerly boundary of Lot 1, Block 1, Map of Blair Court, of record in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court for the County of Roanoke, Virginia, in Plat Book 5, page 36; thence with the line of Lot 1, Block 1, Map of Blair Court, N. 23° 57' E. 85.24' to a point on the northerly side of Virginia State Secondary Route 419, said point designated as A6 on the aforesaid McDaniel plat; thence with the northerly right-of-way of Virginia State Secondary Route 419, a curve to the left whose radius is 1316.23 feet and whose chord bearing is N. 38° 23' S6" W., an arc distance of 365.04 feet to a point designated as A5 t March 27, 1990 218- on the aforesaid McDaniel plat, the place of BEGINNING, and containing 1.839 acres, more or less, and known as Parcel "A" on the aforesaid McDaniel plat; and BEING the same property conveyed to Guy S. Clifton and Pauline H. Clifton, husband and wife, by Truman B. McDaniel, widow, by deed dated May 23, 1968, and recorded in the Clerk's office of the Circuit Court of the County of Roanoke, Virginia, in Deed Book 853, page 748. 5. That the effective date of this ordinance shall be March 27, 1990. On motion of Supervisor Eddy, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None 390-6 An ordinance to rezone approximately 35 acres from R-1 to B-2 for commercial development, generally located south of I-81 and west of Plantation Road in the Hollins Magisterial District upon the request of the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors (Household of Faith). 0-32790-9 The staff report was presented by Mr. Hartley. The significant impact factors are that the site is bordered by the Days Inn Motor Lodge, I-81, Lakeland Stables, and several single family residents and the site layout is unknown due to lack of a concept plan. There are five proffered conditions. There were two citizens to speak in opposition at the Planning Commission and the petition was denied because of the impact of putting commercial next to residential and `' inconsistency with the Comprehensive Plan by a vote of 3 to 2. 2 ~ 9 March 27, 1990 Mr. Hartley stated a a oug - enera ommercia district permits a wide variety of uses, the property owner has proffered prohibiting certain uses. They have also agreed to a four- story height limitation, excluding the steeples and bell towers. Access to the site is available from Carvin Street or Enon Drive using rights- of-way for this parcel. Access directly from Plantation Road to the east is not presently available but could be negotiated with adjoining property owners. The petitioner has proffered that access to the parcel will be from Plantation Road. Supervisor Eddy questioned whether there is a shortage of B- 2 zonings in the county. He noted that this parcel is landlocked by private roads and retail use is difficult to imagine. Mr. Hartley stated that the site is visible but inaccessible from I-81 and access from Plantation Road is necessary for development. The B-2 zoning was a compromise with the Planning Commission and citizens since Industrial District M-1 zoning was originally suggested by the Economic Development Department. The following citizens spoke regarding the proposed rezoning. Myrtle Pullen, 7937 Enon Drive, was concerned about the drainage and increased traffic in North Burlington Heights. She was also concerned about bright lights, noise, dust and pollution of owner wells. Margaret Carter,_ operator of a nearby service station, was concerned about the view of scenery for travelers along I-81 and requested the site be left alone. Supervisor Eddy expressed concern about the unknown aspect of the rezoning and if fully developed, the site could hold more than one March 27, 1990 `~ 2 4 motel. He felt it was desirable for commercia purposes u e wou like a specific proposal. Alan Klinger, representing the House of Faith, explained the financial situation of the church and their need to sell the property. If they could sell a portion of the land, they would still construct the church. He stated that they are agreeable with the B-2 zoning. Supervisor Johnson moved to approve the ordinance. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None ABSTAIN: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw ORDINANCE 32790-9 TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICA- TION OF APPROXIMATELY 35 ACRES OF REAL ESTATE GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTH OF INTERSTATE 81 AND WEST OF PLANTATION ROAD IN THE HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION R-1 TO B- 2 FOR COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT WITH CONDITIONS UPON THE APPLICATION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA. WHEREAS, by Resolution 91289-4 the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, initiated amendments to the Comprehensive Plan and to the classifications of certain real estate located in Roanoke County to serve the public purposes of the County as required by public necessity, convenience, general welfare, and good zoning practice to implement the recommendations of the Economic Development Action Plan for FY 1989- 90; and g WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on January 23, 1990, and the second reading and public hearing was held on March 2? 1 March 27, 1990 27, 1990; an , WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on March 6, 1990; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing approximately 35 acres, as described herein, owned by Household of Faith and generally located south of Interstate 81 and west of Plantation Road in the Hollins Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification R-1, Single Family Residential District, to the zoning classification of B-2, General Commercial District, for industrial development. 2. That the Board initiated the application to change the zoning classification of this real estate located in Roanoke County to serve the public purposes of the County as required by public necessity, convenience, general welfare, and good zoning practice to implement the recommendations of the Economic Development Action Plan for FY 1989- 90. 3. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: BEGINNING at a point on the southerly side of Interstate Highway Route #81, said point being the northerly corner of property of Interstate Motel Developers, Inc. (D.B. 861, page 124) and shown as corner l; thence with the division line between property of Florence Marie Peters and Interstate Motel Developers, Inc., S. 31° 09' 00" E. 1364.15' to a point, corner 2; thence S. 58° 50' 00" W. 100.44' to corner 4B; thence S. 30° 45' 00" W. 453.23' to corner 4A, at the northeast terminus of Carvin Street; thence with the same in March 27, 1990 222 part, and the northerly line of Lot 9, Sec. 3, Walrond court (P.B. 2, page 178), S. 59° 40' 45" W. 551.20' to corner 5 on the easterly boundary of Billy H. Branch; thence with same, and the easterly boundary of North Burlington Heights (P.B. 3, page 57), N. 36° 44' 23" W. 1750.93' to a fence post, corner 6; thence with the easterly boundary of Ellsworth L. Snyder and Bonnie E. Osborne Snyder (D.B. 1026, page 631) and Randolph Howell and Gladys R. Howell (D.B. 570, page 293), N. 37° 24' 00" W. 619.48' to an iron pin on the southerly side of Interstate Highway Route #81; thence with a curved line to the right, whose radius is 4490.66 feet, and whose chord bearing and distance is S. 89° 34' 57" E. 3.36 feet, an arc distance of 3.36 feet to corner 8, another point on the southerly side of Interstate Highway Route #81; thence with the same S. 89° 33' 40" E. 1044.68' to corner 1, the place of BEGINNING, and designated as Tract I, containing 35.14 acres, all as more fully shown on a plat prepared by Buford T. Lumsden & Associates, P.C., Engineers and Surveyors, dated July 31, 1985, entitled "Plat showing Tract I (35.14 ac.) being conveyed to the Household of Faith by Florence Marie Peters, situated along south side of Interstate Highway Route #81, Hollins Magisterial District, Roanoke County, Virginia"; and, BEING a part of the same property acquired by J. H. Peters, Jr. and Florence Marie Peters by deed from J. S. Jamison and Fannie A. Jamison, his wife, dated June 12, 1947, and recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of the County of Roanoke, Virginia, in Deed Book 373, page 216, and subsequently conveyed by J. H. Peters, Jr. and Florence Marie Peters to "Florence Marie Peters and J. H. Peters, Jr. , and/or the survivor as at common law as between the grantees," said deed being dated July 26, 1952, and recorded in the aforesaid Clerk's Office in Deed Book 477, page 136, the said J. H. Peters, Jr. having since passed away, survived by the Grantor herein. 4. That Household of Faith, as owner of this real estate, has voluntarily proffered in writing the following conditions which the Board of Supervisors hereby accepts: (1) Building height no more than four stories, excluding steeples and bell towers. (2) Lighting not to exceed one foot candle measured at property line of any of the adjoining single-family residences. 223 March 27, 1990 u er zone o e ee a ~acen o ac si e residential area. (4) Exclusion of the following permitted uses: commercial kennels and veterinarian hospitals, freestanding dance halls and billiard parlors, flea market, freestanding used car dealership, and freestanding laundry/dry cleaners. (5) Access to the property for the church shall be from Carvin Street and/or Plantation Road. Access to the property for any other commercial use shall be only from Plantation Road. 5. That the effective date of this ordinance shall be March 27, 1990. On motion of Supervisor Johnson, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None ABSTAIN: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw 390-7 An ordinance to amend the Proffered Conditions on the rezoning of a 2.85 acre tract of real estate located at the northeasterly corner of Peters Creek Road and Woodhaven Drive in the Hollins Magisterial District from B-2 Conditional to B-2 Conditional (Amendment to Signage Proffers), upon the request of Hop-In Food Stores, Inc. 0-32790-10 Supervisor Johnson moved to approve both ordinances regarding amendment to the signage conditions requested by Hop-In (Item 390-7 and 390-8) . Supervisor Eddy questioned the maximum height of the sign at March 27, 1990 1 Z 4 e op- n ecause ere was a diagram showing a 20 ft height for the Peters Creek Road sign, but no similar diagram was shown for the 419 sign. Ed Natt, representing the petitioner, advised that although it could not be proffered at this time, the maximum height of the sign for the 419 Hop-In would be 20 ft. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None AMENDED ORDINANCE 32790-10 TO AMEND PROFFERED CONDITIONS ON THE REZONING OF A 2.85 ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED AT THE NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF PETERS CREEK ROAD AND WOODHAVEN DRIVE IN THE HOLLINB MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM TH8 ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF B-2, CONDITIONAL, TO THE .ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF B-2, CONDITIONAL (AMENDMENT TO SIGNAGB PROFFERS) UPON THE APPLICATION OF HOP-IN FOOD STORES, INC. WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on February 27, 1990, and the second reading and public hearing was held March 27, 1990; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on March 6, 1990; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law; and WHEREAS, this property was rezoned from R-1, Residential District, to B-2, Business District with proffered conditions, on July 12, 1988. 225= March 27, 1990 y e oar o uperv sots o oano a oun y, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing approximately 2.85 acres, as described herein, and located at the northeasterly corner of Peters Creek Road and Woodhaven Drive in the Hollins Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of 8-2, Conditional, to the zoning classification of B- 2, Conditional with amended proffered conditions. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of Hop-In Food Stores, Inc. 3. That the applicant has voluntarily proffered in writing the following amendment to Proffer 2(d) of the conditions approved by the Board of Supervisors on July 12, 1988, which the Board of Supervisors hereby accepts: (1) Signage shall not exceed 60 square feet on the freestanding sign adjacent to the Peters Creek Road right-of-way; identification sign on the building not to exceed 55 square feet; signage on the building of adjacent premises (donut store) not to exceed 35 square feet; plus an 18 square foot gas identification sign. All other proffers and conditions would remain in full force. 4. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: A 2.85 acre parcel of land, generally located at the northeasterly intersection of Peters Creek Road and Woodhaven Drive within the Hollins Magisterial District and recorded as Parcel No. 26.20-4-27 in the Roanoke County Tax Records. 5. That the effective date of this ordinance shall be March 27, 1990. On motion of Supervisor Johnson, and carried by the following March 27, 1990 2 2 6 ecor a vo e: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None 390-8 An ordinance to amend proffered conditions on the resoninq of a 0.6764 acre tract of real estate located at the northeast coraer of Glen Heather Drive aad Route 419 in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District from 8-2 Conditional to B-2 Conditional (Amendment of Signage Proffers) , upon the request of Hop-In Food Stores, Inc. 0-32790-11 This ordinance was discussed under 390-7. Supervisor Johnson moved to approve the ordinance. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None AMENDED ORDINANCE 32790-11 TO AMEND PROFFERED CONDITIONS ON THE REZONING OF A 0.6764-ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF GLEN HEATHER DRIPE AND ROIITE 419 IN THE WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF B-2, CONDITIONAL, TO fiHE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF B-2, CONDITIONAL (AMENDMENT TO SIGNAGE PROFFERS) IIPON THE APPLICATION OF HOP-IN FOOD STOR88, INC. WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on February 27, 1990, and the second reading and public hearing was held March 27, 1990; and, r _ WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on March 6, 1990; and, ,L 2 7 March 27, 1990 ega no ice an aver isemen as een prove a as required by law; and WHEREAS, this property was rezoned from R-3, Residential District, to B-2, Business District with proffered conditions, on December 13, 1988. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing 0.6764 acre, as described herein, and located at the northeast corner of Glen Heather Drive and Route 419 in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of B-2, Conditional with proffered conditions, to the zoning classification of B-2, Conditional with amended proffered conditions. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of Hop-In Food Stores, Inc. 3. That the applicant has voluntarily proffered in writing the following amendment to Proffer #4 of the conditions approved by the Board of Supervisors on December 13, 1988, which the Board of Supervisors hereby accepts: (1) Signage shall not exceed 30 square feet on the freestanding sign to be placed near the intersection of Route 419 and Glen Heather Drive; identification sign on the building not to exceed 55 square feet; plus an 18 square foot gas identification sign. All other proffers and conditions would remain in full force. 4. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: An 0.06764 acre parcel of land, generally located . March 27, 1990 ~ 2 p on the northeast corner of Glen Heather Drive and Route 419 within the Windsor Hills Magisterial District and recorded as the southerly portion of Parcel No. 76.07-02-52 in the Roanoke County Tax Records. 5. That the effective date of this ordinance shall be March 27, 1990. On motion of Supervisor Johnson, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None T. PUBLIC HEARINGS 390-9 Petition of Wally L. Andrews for a Special Exception Permit to operate a shooting match, located at the intersection of Rutrough RoaB and Highland Road in the Vinton Magisterial District.(WITHDRAWN BY THE PETITIONER) WITHDRAWN 390-10 Petition of Avis Rent A Car Licensee for a Special Exception Permit to operate a car and truck rental agency located at 3137 Brambleton Avenue S. W. in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District. A-32790-12 Mr. Hartley reported that this area is within a transition land use category and the proposed use is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan map and policies. However, the property is already improved and is in a historically established commercial strip corridor. Mr. Hartley advised that the interior traffic patterns will be severely constrained by lot sign and the concept plan indicates . 22 9 March 27, 1990 access from both Brambleton Avenue and Harris Street. The plan does not comply with County street and parking design standards; however, the petitioner has indicated that the existing canopy will be removed which will accommodate 18 - 20 parking spaces. Three proffers are being requested by the staff. They are (1) total site signage shall be limited to 1.5 sq. ft. per linear foot of Brambleton Avenue frontage (2) all vehicle maintenance shall be conducted only inside existing structure and (3) the metal canopy on south portion of the lot fronting on Brambleton Avenue shall be removed. Mr. Geoffrey M. Ottoway, President of Avis Rent A Car, was present to answer questions. Supervisor Eddy inquired as to what would be the size of a medium truck, how many could be parked on the site, and stated that in granting a special exception permit, the board could impose conditions. Supervisor Nickens asked whether the recommended 1.5 sq. ft. per linear foot of frontage was consistent with the ordinance being proposed by the Planning Commission, and if the stated 125 ft frontage was adequate. The petitioner responded that he was in agreement with the signage proffer. Supervisor Eddy moved that the special exception permit be granted with the conditions that (1) no more than five medium size trucks will be parked at one time and (2) special exception permit be limited to a two year renewal. Mr. Smeltzer, attorney for the petitioner, advised that the property was purchased on a permanent basis; the proposed conditions were arrived at with the petitioner; there is no difficulty with the V March 27, 1990 2 3 Q signage; ey wou c ari y a on y minor main enance wou be done on the exterior; and they plan to remove the canopy but would need at least six months to accomplish this. Supervisor McGraw made a substitute motion to approve the petition as requested with the added proffers. Supervisor Nickens offered an amendment to Supervisor McGraw~s motion to approve the petition with (1) signage limited to 1.5 sq. ft. per linear foot frontage, (2) under-hood maintenance to be done inside, and (3) canopy to be removed by September 1, 1990. The amended substitute motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: Supervisor Eddy II. CITISENB~ COMMENTS AND COMMIINICATIONS 1. Rebecca Karnes, Feather Road, Vinton, was opposed to east County residents having to join the Town of Vinton if consolidation is approved. Chairman Robers directed the staff to respond to Mrs. Karnes concerns with more specific information about the tax rates. 2. Emanuel Francis Sowder, 4850 Brookwood Drive, presented a resolution asking that the real estate tax rate be decreased. 3. C. E. Stewart. Jr., 462 Cameron Drive, Vinton, presented a r r ,2 ~ ~ March 27, 1990 of Vinton if consolidation is approved. IN R8: IlDJ0IIRNI~IBNT Supervisor Robers moved to adjourn at 9:50 p.m. The motion carried by a unanimous voice vote. AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None Richard W. Robers, Chairman ACTION NO. A-42490-10.a ITEM NUMBER ~" AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: April 10, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: Request for approval of a Raffle Permit from the Clearbrook Rescue Auxiliary COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Clearbrook Rescue Auxiliary has requested a Raffle Permit for a raffle to be held in Roanoke County on May 5, 1990. This application has been reviewed by the Commissioner of Revenue and he recommends that it be approved. The application is on file in the Clerk's Office. The organization has paid the $25.00 fee. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the application for a Raffle Permit be approved. SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: Mary H. Allen Elmer C. Hodge Clerk to the Board ------------------- County Administrator -------- ACTION Approved (X Motion by: Rnh r T --------------------- VOTE }- j , , Denied incnn n No Yes Abs Received ( ) Eddy ___x_ Referred ( ) Johnson ~ To ( ) McGraw -~- Nickens ~ _ _ b Ro ers ~_ cc: File Bingo/Raffle File . .T ~~ e Application is hereby made for a bingo game or raffle permit. This application is made subject to all County and State laws, ordinances, rules, and regulations now in force, or that may be enacted hereafter and which are hereby agreed to by the under- signed applicant and which shall be deemed a condition under which this permit is issued. APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO CONDUCT RAFFLES OR BINGO All applicants should exercise extreme care to ensure the accura- cy of their responses to the following questions. Bingo games and raffles are strictly regulated by Title 18.2-340.1 et. s^ g. of the criminal statutes of the Virginia Code, and by Section 4-86 et. sew, of the Roanoke County Code. These laws authorize the County Board of Supervisors to conduct a reasonable investiga- tion prior to granting a bingo or raffle permit. The Board has sixty days from the filing of an application to grant or deny the permit. The Board may deny, suspend, or revoke the permit of any organization found not to be in strict compliance with county and state law. Any person violating county or state regulations concerning these permits shall be guilty of a Class 1 misdemeanor. Any person who uses any part of the gross receipts from bingo or raffles for any purpose other than the lawful religious, charitable, community, or educational purposes for which the organization is specifi- cally organized, except for reasonable operating expenses, shall be guilty of a Class 6 felony. THIS APPLICATION ~ FOR: (check one) RAFFLE PERMIT ~ BINGO GAMES Name of Organization ~, ~'~~hr"OU Street Address COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA COMMISSIONER OF THE REVENUE Mailing Address~~~!? k ~~~o ~ ~~~ca U~ City, State, Zip Code i~ rpose and Type of Organization ~.S~PI~Orf ~ l ~i ~i°_u ~ IJ~Pv~~ ~U ~ ~ ~~ i / ~ When was the organization founded? ~98s 1 Roanoke County meeting place?(s~Q~ 6ro~ ~ /~SC;UtL~ ~~Q y- Has organization been in xistence in Roanoke County for two con- tinuous years? YES / NO ~. Is the organization non-profit? YES NO Indicate Federal Identification Number # ~'~- ~ ~~02~ ~ Attach copy of IRS Tax Exemption letter. Officers of the Organization: President Vice-President, l I~ to t-1 (~~5 Address: Secretary Address • ~ ~~ ~~P ' C~- ~ ~ o ~ ~- ~ ~ Address : ,~ ~ ~ ~ !-7 YY~ nc{ c:~ ~ ~,L'- ~ `~ ~ ~~ `4 ~~ Treasurer : ()..~ ~ i l 5 Address: t,•-.~~ 2 I ~CL ct ~~ t Member authorized to be responsible for Raffle or Bingo opera- tions: Name"f C~~`~ 1 1C1., ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 Vl Home Address ~~ VG ~~'tb ~ `t' Phone~DJj- ~ ~~-~S~~JBus . Phone - v~ A COMPLETE LIST OF THE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF CURRENT MEMBER- SHIP MUST BE FURNISHED WITH THIS APPLICATION. Specific location wher Raffle °r ~u; ^ ~'_~~^° is to be conducted. ~„ ~ ~G~t ~~vG ~ .~ ~ r~~ ~Sc~~ S~uac~ ~\d~~. ate. ~. nc~ lc~~n ~2~, R~ ~~ ~a~~a~~ ~ 1 r RAFFLES: (Date of Drawing lL Time of Drawing ~ NOo BINGO: Days of Week & Hours of Activity:,,( n Sunday From To Monday From To Tuesday From To Wednesday From To Thursday From To Friday From To Saturday From To 2 State specifically how the proceeds from the Bingo/Raffle will be used. List in detail the planned or intended use of the proceeds. Use estimates amounts if necessary. ~ ~ ~ ~ )~~ Cvrvl a-u-~/~ 7~ ~ .G,~.1 ~L ,1.c.1 ~~ ~~~ ~2 -~~a~-~~ ~~ ',~~~--e.~ 3 BINGO: Complete the following: Legal owner(s) of the building where BINGO is to be conducted: Name: Address: County S~.ate Zips Is the building owned by 'a 501-C~~-on-profs organization? Seatinc~~c~pacity for `each locaticfn: Parking~lsp~ces for each location ALL RA FLE ND BINGI 1 . Gros rece is f r~ Bingo ga es or stant dar year period. BIN 1st Quar r 2nd Quar er 3rd Quar r 4th Quart r Total lst Quarter 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter Total 2. Does your organization understand that it is a violation of law to enter into a contract with any person or firm, associa- tion, organization, partnership, or corporation of any classifica- tion whatsoever, for the purpose of organizing, managing, or con- ducting Bingo Games or Raffles? 3. Does your organization understand that it must maintain and file complete records of receipts and disbursements pertaining to Bingo games and Raffles, and that such records arse subject to audit by the Commissioner of the Revenue? ,~ 4. Does your organization understand that the Commissioner of the Revenue or his designee has the right to go upon the premises on which any organization is conducting a Bingo game or raffle, to perform unannounced audits, and to secure for audit all re- cords required to be maintained for Bingo games or raffles? Q.~1/ PPLICA~JTS MUS~IER QUESTIONS 1 - 19 all so~rces relate to the operation of ngo by calendar qua ter for prior calen- INSTANT BI 4 5. Does your organization understand that a Financial Report must be filed with the Commissioner of the Revenue on or before the first day of November f each calendar year for which a per- mit has been issued? 6. Does your organization understand that if gross receipts ex- ceed fifty thousand dollars during any calendar quarter, an addi- tional Financial Report must be filed for such quarter no later than sixty days following the last day of such quarter? ~,~ 7. Does your organization understand that the failure to file financial reports when due shall cause automatic revocation of the permit, and no such organization shall conduct any Bingo game or raffle thereafter until such report is properly filed and a new permit is obtained? ~~ 8. Does your organization understand that each Financial Report must be accompanied by a Certificate, verified under oath by the Board of Directors, that the proceeds of any Bingo game or raffle have been used for these lawful, religious, charitable, commu- nity, or educational purposes for which the organization is spe- cifically chartered or organized, and that the operation of Bingo games or raffles have been in accordance with the provisions of Article 1.1 of Chapter 8, Title 18.2 of the Code of Virginia? _~~~ 9. Does your organization understand that a one percent audit fee of the gross receipts must be paid to the County of Roanoke upon submission of the annual financial report due on or before the first of November? 10. Does your organization understand that this permit is valid only in the County of Roanoke and only at such locations, and far such dates, as are designated in the permit application? L 11. Does your organization understand that no person, except a bona fide member of any such organization who shall have been a member of such organization for at least ninety days prior to such participation, shall participate in the management, opera- tion, or conduct of any bingo game or raffle, and no person shall receive any remuneration for participating in management, operation, or conduct of any such game or raffle? 12. Has your organization attached a check for the annual permit fee in the amount of $25.00 payable to the County of Roanoke, Virginia? q~ 13. Does yo organization understand that any organization found in violation of the County Bingo and Raffle Ordinance or X18.2- 340.10 of the Code of Virginia authorizing this permit is subject to having such permit revoked and any person, shareholder, agent, member or employee of such organization who violates the above to having such permit revoked and any person, shareholder, agent, member or employee of such organization who violates the above referenced Codes may be guilty of a felony? ~ 5 14. Has your organization attached a complete list of its member- ship to this application form? ~{~,Q,~ 15. Has your organization atta hed a copy of i bylaws to this application form?/?D ~„v,~, ~-r..- ~ ,Q~_ ~~~~~ f ~ ~~ 16. Has the organization been declared exempt from property taxa- tion under the Virginia Constitution or statutes? If yes, state whether exemption is for~rea~~pers al propert~, or both and identify exempt property. 18. Is this organization incorporated in Virginia?_ If ye nam an a ress of Regi tered Agent: c1 !2 ~-u-c_ b~ ° ~Ol 19. Is the organization registered with the Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Affairs pursuant to the Cha~,itable Solicitations Act, Section 57-48 of the Virginia Code? (If so, attach copy of registration.) Has the organization been granted an exemption from registration by th Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Affairs? (~ (If so, attach copy of exemption.) ALL RAFFLE APPLICANTS DESCRIBE THE ARTICLES TO BE RAFFLED, VALUE OF SUCH ARTICLES, AND PROCEED TO NOTARIZATION. Article Description Fai Market Value r °~Z~_ ~ / 5 a C~ z~ ~1 ~~ ~`~ 6 ALL BINGO APPLICANTS MUST ANSWER QUESTIONS 20 - 27 BEFORE NOTARIZATION RAFFLE APPLICANTS, GO TO NOTARIZATION. 20. Does your organization understand that the bingo games shall not be conducted more frequently than two calendar days in any calendar week? 21. Does your organization understand that it is required to keep complete records of the bingo game. These records based on §18.2- 340.6 of the Code of Virginia and §4.98 of Roanoke County Code must include the following: a. A record of the date, quantity, and card value of instant bingo supplies purchased, as well as the name and address of the supplier of such instant bingo supplies, and written invoice or receipt is also required for each purchase of in- stant bingo supplies? b. A record in writing of the dates on which Bingo is played, the number of people in attendance on each date, and the amount of receipts and prizes on each day? (These records must be retained for three years.) c. A record of the name and address of each individual to whom a door prize, regular or special Bingo game prize or jackpot from the playing of Bingo is awarded? d. A complete and itemized record of all receipts and disburse- ments which support, and that agree with, the quarterly and annual reports required to be filed, and that these records must be maintained in reasonable order to permit audit? 22. Does your organization understand that instant Bingo may only be conducted at such time as regular Bingo game is in progress, and only at such locations and at such times as are specified in this application? 23. Does your organization understand that the gross receipts in the course of a reporting year from the playing of instant Bingo may not exceed 33 1/3~ of the gross receipts of an organization's Bingo operation? 24. Does your organization understand it may not sell an instant Bingo card to an individual below sixteen years of age? 25. Does your organization understand that an organization whose gross receipts from all bingo operations that exceed or are ex- pected to exceed $75,000 in any calendar year shall have been granted tax-exempt status pursuant to Section 501 C of the United States Internal Revenue Service? (Certificate must be attached.) 7 26. Does your organization understand that a Certificate of Occu- pancy must be obtained or be on ile which authorizes this use at the proposed location? 27. Does your o.rganizati n understand that awards or prize money or merchandise v lued in excess of the following amounts are illegal? a. No door prize shall exceed twenty-five dollars. b. No regular Bingo or special Bingo game shall exceed One Hund- red dollars. c. No jackpot of any nature whatsoever shall exceed One Thousand Dollars, nor shalt the total amount of jackpot prizes awarded in any one calendar day exceed One Thousand Dollars. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * NOTARIZATION: THE FOLLOWING OATH MUST BE TAKEN BY ALL APPLICANTS I hereby swear or affirm under the penalties of perjury as set forth in §18.2 of the Code of Virginia, that all of the above statements are true to the best of my knowledge, information, and beliefs. All questions have been answered. S i g rye~3 by u n ame Subscribed and sworn before me, T My commission expires: > 5~~ ~~~::~. 12d ~ , v~ Home Address ~~,~ ~ ~ L. this ~_day of 19 ~~ l 1 1~~ ~. ~iVota y Pub_1ic RETURN THIS COMPLETED APPLICATION T0: COMMISSIONER OF THE REVENUE P.O. Box 20409 Roanoke, VA 24018-0513 8 NOT VALID UNLESS COUNTERSIGNED The above application, having been found in due form, is approved and issued to the applicant to have effect until December 31st of this calendar year. ~ _ C1-~ 'A ~ Date ~., Comm ssioner o e evenue The above application is not approved. Date Commissioner of the Revenue 9 ACTION NO. A-42490-10.b ITEM NUMBER ~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: April 18, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: Acceptance of Winesap Drive into the Secondary System by the Virginia Department of Transportation COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Roanoke County has received acknowledgement that the following road has been accepted into the Secondary System by the Virginia Department of Transportation effective April 12, 1990. 0.14 miles of Winesap Drive (Route 1084) SUBMITTED BY: APPROV D BY: . Q.C~~ ,,,.,,~-,, ~ e.. ) , Mary H. Allen Elmer C. Hodge Clerk to the Board County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved (~ Motion by: Rnh T._ .Tnhnsnn No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Robers ~ Received ( ) Eddy -~ Referred ( ) Johnson x To ( ) McGraw _~ Nickens x cc: File Phillip Henry, Director, Engineering ,i " tia ,, 11.~~~~~t.,Ul~l '~`W 1i~~~~1C~ ~~ ~~l[d~~s'Y11~ DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1401 EAST BROAD STREET RAY D. PETHTEL RICHYIOND, 23219 COMMISSIONER April 12, 1990 Secondary System Addition Roanoke County Board of Supervisors County of Roanoke P. 0. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 MEMBERS OF THE BOARD: OSCAR K. MARRY DEPUTY COMMISSIONER As requested in your resolution dated March 13, 1990, the following addition to the Secondary System of Roanoke County is hereby approved, effective April 12, 1990. THE ORCHARD - APPLEWOOD. SECTION 3 Route 1084 (Winesap Drive} - From Route 1089 to 0.14 mile Southwest Route 1089. Sincerely, ~x~~-~'~ Oscar K. Mabry Deputy Commissioner 0.14 Mi. ?"R~?kNSPORTATION FOR ""HE 21ST CEN1"URY L- l COUNTY OF ROANORE, VIRGINIA CAPITAL FUND UNAPPROPRIATED BALANCE Beginning Balance at July 1, 1989 $ 89,608 September 12, 1989 Contribution towards Hollins Fire Truck (25,000) March 13, 1990 Automatic Court Documentation System (25,000 Balance as of April 24, 1990 39 608 Submitted by ~,~~ ~. ~ Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance ~-a COUNTY OF ROANORE, VIRGINIA GENERAL FUND UNAPPROPRIATED BALANCE Balance at July 1, 1989 November 15, 1989 Dental Insurance November 28, 1989 Drainage Projects December 19, 1989 December 19, 1989 December 19, 1989 January 9, 1990 January 23, 1990 March 13, 1990 Library Automation Drainage Engineer - half year Bushdale Road Right of Way Hurricane Hugo Expenses Implementation of New Police Department Contract Mowing and Equipment for Parks and Recreation April 10, 1990 School Deficit April 10, 1990 Recycling Grant Matching Funds April 10, 1990 Renovation of the Offices of the Treasurer, Commissioner of the Revenue and Procurement Balance as of April 24, 1990 ~ of Amount General Fund $4,483,543 7.10 (106,980) (180,000) (300,000) (17,500) (15,000) (109,000) (157,700) (50,000) (500,000) (150,600) (56.000) $2,840,763 4.500 Submitted by Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance On December 19, 1989, the Board of Supervisors adopted a goal statement to maintain the General Fund Unappropriated Balance at a minimum of 6.25 of General Fund expenditures ($63,168,000), which is $3,948,000. "' ,~ COUNTY OF ROANORE, VIRGINIA RESERVE FOR BOARD CONTINGENCY Beginning Balance at July 1, 1989 Additional Amount from 1989-90 Budget June 14, 1989 Contribution to Va. Amateur Sports July 11, 1989 Purchase of drainage easement July 11, 1989 Option on 200 acres real estate July 25, 1989 Donation to Julian Wise Foundation August 8, 1989 County supplement for new position in Sheriff's Department August 22, 1989 Part time volunteer coordinator August 22, 1989 Public Information for Police Department referendum November 28, 1989 Stormwater Feasibility Study December 22, 1989 Copy machine rental for Treasurer's Office (Administratively approved) December 29, 1989 Portable telephones for Rescue personnel (Administratively approved) Balance as of April 24, 1990 $11,395 50,000 (25,000) (5,000) (3,750) (5,000) (869) (5,800) (9,000) (3,382) (2,415) 1 045 134 Submitted by ~• Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: April 24, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: Status Report on the Library Automation Project COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND• On December 19, 1989, the Board of Supervisors approved the County staff recommendation to participate in the regional Library Automation project with the City of Roanoke and City of Salem. Since that time, the Library staff representatives have reviewed the equipment proposals with the vendors, to take advantage of system improvements available between the date of the Proposal and the current date. The City Attorney's office has been working with the contract documents and plans to meet with representatives of D R A, (the vendor) during the second week of May to finalize the contract between the City (on behalf of the participants) and the vendor. It is anticipated that the document will be signed by the end of May. Part of the delay in this task is the fact that the staff attorney in the City Attorney's office assigned to this project left the employment of the City at the end of March and the project had to be reassigned to someone else. Our staff is anxious to begin the project which will include the labeling of all of the books in our collection, the compilation of the data files, and the installation and training on the new equipment. While this project has progressed much slower than any of us would like, we still feel that the vendor chosen and the process we will be using is the best product for the Roanoke Valley. Once the final order has been awarded by the City, our staff can begin the process of building the final data base. Our staff will continue to provide periodic updates to this project and keep you informed of its progress. ALTERNATIVES AND IMPACT: L-~ RECOMNlENDATION• Respectfully submitted, Approved by, ~' ~,~- ohn M. Chambliss, Jr. Elmer C. Hodge Assistant Administrator County Administrator ---------------------------------------------- Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) ACTION Motion by: VOTE No Yes Abs Eddy Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers ITEM NUMBER __!' '! --F---- AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: April l4, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: Service Award Presentations COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND: The Board of Supervisors recognizes employees for their years of service to the County. Employees are recognized for five years of service and successive five-year intervals. Employees are presented with a certificate of recognition at the Board of Supervisors' ~-eeting and may seartment SofvHumapl Resources appropriate award through the Dep following the ceremony. The list of 1989 service award recipients is attached for the presentation of service certificates. Following the presentation, a reception will be held to honor service award recipients and their families. We congratulate these dedicated employees. There is also a group of long service employees who deserve special recognition. These employees have had at least 25 years of County service. A list of these individuals is also attached. SUBMITTED BY: D. K. Cook Director of Human Resources APPRO ED BY: 1 f~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ------------------------------------ E Approved ( ) Motion by: Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred To ACTION VOT No Yes Abs Eddy Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers m_~ 1989 SERVICE AWARD RECIPIENTS 30 Years Ronald R. Henderson, Sheriff's Office 25 Years Eudora J. Altice, Finance Richard L. Francisco, Solid Waste Ola M. Myers, Social Services 2U Years Clarence W. Cawley, Sheriff's Office Sandra G. Helm, Treasurer's Office Michael F. Henninger, Sheriff's Office Kenneth L. Hogan, Animal Control Charles H. Jennings, Jr., Solid Waste Charles P. Kane, Sheriff's Office E. Elizabeth Leah, Voter Registration Harold Palmer, Solid Waste 15 Years Linda D. Blair, Social Services Kenneth E. Boone, Utility Janet H. Camden, Sheriff's Office Patricia A. Carter, Library Stephen G. Ferguson, Sheriff's Office Frank J. Greenway, Solid Waste Anita B. Hammerstrom, Social Services Patricia A. James, Clerk of Circuit Court James W. Leftwich, Solid Waste Ralph C. Mason, Jr., Sheriff's Office Robert B. McClain, Parks Maintenance Lewis S. Poage, Animal Control Cyd D. Ransone, Library Diane St. John, Voter Registration Leonard J. Wade, Sheriff's Office 10 Years David K. Adams, Utility Catherine S. Ayers, MIS Timothy E. Burford, Solid Waste Alice M. Carrico, Utility William D. Cochrane, Solid Waste Samuel W. Crews, Commissioner of Revenue Victoria S. Dillard, Social Services Michael C. Goff, Solid Waste Timothy W. Gubala, Economic Development Doris B. Hamilton, Social Services Gerald S. Holt, Sheriff's Office James C. Journell, Building Maintenance m- 10 Years (cont.) Donald W. Kelley, Animal Control James R. Lavinder, Sheriff's Office Mark W. Light, Fire and Rescue Ruth A. Lipnik, Library Paul A. Lipscomb, Solid Waste George T. Madagan, Utility Merry S. McKissick, Sheriff's Office Bobby H. Meador, Utility Donald G. Meador, Sheriff's Office Charles E. Moore, Sheriff's Office Richard S. Moorer, Sheriff's Office Lawrence J. Onan, Parks Maintenance Philip J. Patrone, Sheriff's Office William E. Poole, Sheriff's Office Bonnie B. Preas, Procurement Cecil C. Reynolds, Jr., Parks Maintenance Donna C. Rigney, Sheriff's Office Roger F. Robinson, Sheriff's Office Virgil L. Rogers, III, Sheriff's Office Lois J. Spigle, Library Charles E. Swain, Parks Maintenance Michael L. Vaught, Utility Leigh A. Vulgan, Sheriff's Office Jack A. Wise, Parks Maintenance Eurman V. Wiseman, Jr., Utility 5 Years Mary H. Allen, Board of Supervisors Aileen V. Bohon, Sheriff's Office Reta R. Busher, Management and Budget Steve A. Carper, Jr., Utility Jack G. Council, Procurement Blake P. Critz, Sheriff's Office William E. Driver, Real Estate Assessment Harold W. Ewers, Sheriff's Office Ann Geraci, Real Estate Assessment Marvin C. Goin, Engineering Joan A. Gurganious, Social Services Richard L. Harless, Utility Jerome Ni. Hoer, Commissioner of Revenue Gary L. Houtf, Fire and Rescue Vicky H. Huff, Sheriff's Office Susan S. Jacobs, Real Estate Assessments Ramona P. Kern, Sheriff's Office Gregory A. King, Fire and Rescue Gloria Jean Lovelace, Sheriff's Office Marvin L. Loyd, Sheriff's Office Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney Stephen I'. Maxey, Fire and Rescue William J. Morgan, Sr., Sheriff's Office Paul C. Nielsen, Sheriff's Office m-~ 5 Years (cont.) Cynthia L. Nipper, Engineering William A. Richardson, General Services Sandra D. Rycroft, Social Services Florence S. Sellards, Parks & Recreation Peggy A. Setchel, Fire and Rescue William C. Sledd, Solid Waste Ronnie W. Stump, Sheriff's Office Joey T. Stump, Fire and Rescue Steven C. Sturgill, Sheriff's Office Nancy A. Thomas, Treasurer's Office George A. Thompson, MIS Beverly T. Waldo, Youth Haven II David C. Wells, Sheriff's Office Steven D. White, Real Estate Assessments John D. Willey, Real Estate Assessments Charles M. Wilson, Fire and Rescue Laura G. Wilson, Commissioner of Revenue Danny L. Wood, Fire and Rescue Catharine Z'. Wright, Sheriff's Office 3/7/90 m-i RECOGNITION OF LONG SERVICE EMPLOYEES Mary Hicks County Administrator's Office Ronald Henderson Sheriff's Office Hope Patsel Commissioner of Revenue Homer Bryant Solid Waste Robert Lamb Solid Waste Eugene Grubb Parks and Recreation Paul Smith Utility Betty Lucas Social Services Richard Francisco Solid Waste Eudora Altice Finance Ola Myers Social Services 34 years 30 years 30 years 29 years 2$ years 27 years 27 years 27 years 25 years 25 years 25 years 4/17/90 M-a AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, H ON TUESDAY,OApRIL 24,N 1990DMINISTRATION CENTER RESOLUTION EXPRESSING THE APPRECIATION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY TO JACK GRADICR COUNCIL FOR FIVE AND ONE-HALF YEARS OF SERVICES TO ROANORE COUNTY WHEREAS, Jack Gradick Council was first employed in August, 1984, as Director of Procurement Services; and WHEREAS, Mr. Council was the first employee to hold this position and was responsible for the development and implementation of a purchasing manual, the establishment of a Blanket Order System for small purchases, the establishment of an internal policy to address minority business solicitations, and implementation of an automated purchasing system; and WHEREAS, Mr. Council encouraged and assisted in the professionalization of his staff through certification and participation in professional organizations and conducted training sessions to educate Roanoke County Employees in proper procurement procedures. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County expresses its deepest appreciation and the appreciation of the citizens of Roanoke County to JACK GRADICR COUNCIL for five and one-half years of capable, loyal and dedicated service to Roanoke County. FURTHER, the Board of Supervisors does express its best wishes for a happy, restful and productive retirement. 9 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, APRIL 24, 1990 RESOLUTION CERTIFYING EXECUTIVE MEETING WAS HELD IN CONFORMITY WITH THE CODE OF VIRGINIA WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia has convened an executive meeting on this date pursuant to an affirmative recorded vote and in accordance with the provisions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and WHEREAS, Section 2.1-344.1 of the Code of Virginia requires a certification by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia that such executive meeting was conducted in conformity with Virginia Law. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia hereby certifies that, to the best of each members knowledge: 1. Only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements by Virginia law were discussed in the executive meeting which this certification resolution applies, and 2. Only such public business matters as were identified in the motion convening the executive meeting were heard, discussed or considered by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. ACTION # ITEM NUMBER ~ ~-t AT A REGULAR MEETINAT THEHROANO E COUNTYEADMINISTRATION CENTER COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD MEETING DATE: April 24, 1990 AGENDA ITEM• Public Hearing on the Proposed FY 1990-91 Budget COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR' S COMMENTS: ~ ~~"~~'"~~~ ~~~ _i.2~Ci~~c..p~~'W 4u~G(~,-r~..e~ .,-c,C-~'`~'l~l ./J.t 7-~ v"' SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Attached for review by the Board of Supervisors is a copy of the legal advertisement placed in the Roanoke Times and World-News on April 17, 1990, anno The budgetdin and time of the FY 1990-91 budget public hearing. the advertisement reflects thvisors on Aprilal0 t1990 for calendar proposed by the Board of Super year 1991. More specifically, real estate tax revenue and new landfill start up costs were reduced by $271,000 respectively. ~"~'~~` ~ Elmer C. Hodge Reta R. Busher County Administrator Director of Management and Budget ----------- ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs Approved Denied Received Referred To Motion by: Eddy Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers ~f9o- ~ COUNTY OF ROANOKE PUBLIC HEARING ON THE 1990-91 FISCAL YEAR BUDGET The County of Roanoke will hold a public hearing at 7:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard on Tuesday, April 24, 1990, in the Community Room of the Roanoke R anokey Administration Center, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, SW, Virginia. The pu theSe ublichconcerning the proposed annu 1 budgedt oral comment from p for fiscal year 1990-91 summarized below. All interested citizens, groups, senior citizens, and organizations representing the interest of senior citizens are encouraged to attend and to submit comments. SUMMARY OF PROPOSED 1990-91 BUDGET COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA REVENUES Amount Source General Fund: $ 45,659,000 General Property Taxes 12,369,500 Other Local Taxes 577,050 Permits, Fees, and Licenses 165,000 Fines and Forfeitures 165,400 Charges for Services 279,500 Miscellaneous 270,000 Recovered Costs 7,299,000 Commonwealth $ 66,784,450 Total General Fund Budget 7,264,622 Debt Service Fund 331,319 Youth Haven II Fund 1,168,754 Internal Service Fund 451,155 Capital Projects Fund g,4u6,757 Utility Fund 283,294 Offsite Facilities Funds 233,700 Garage II Fund 351,~5G Recreation Fee Class Fund 62,143,821 School Operating Fund 2,724,000 Cafeteria Fund 1,543,521 Federal Programs Fund 736,838 Textbook Fund $152,483,487 Total Budget All Funds (40,390,8081 Less: Interfund Transfers 5112,092,679 Net Budget y9o-~ EXPENDITURES Amount Source General Fund: General Government Administration $ 1,166,127 4,677,291 Constitutional Officers 163,867 Judicial Administration 2,618,244 Management Services 6,677,843 Public Safety 4,653,885 Community Services 7,268,286 Human Services 30,723,230 Transfer to Schools 401,155 Transfer to Capital Outlay 5,383,995 Transfer to Debt Service 846,097 Transfer to Other Funds 2,154,430 Non-Departmental 50,000 Contingent Balance $66,784,450 Total General Fund Balance 7,264,622 Debt Service Fund 331,319 Youth Haven II Fund 1,168,754 Internal Service Fund 451,155 Capital Projects Fund 8,466,757 Utility Fund 283,294 Offsite Facilities Funds 233,700 Garage II Fund 351,256 Recreation Fee Class Fund 62,143,821 School Operating Fund 2,724,000 Cafeteria Fund 1,543,521 Federal Programs Fund 736.838_ Textbook Fund $152,483,487 Total Budget all Funds (40,390,8081 Less: Interfund Transfers $112,092,679 Net Budget ~ ~ V Q ~ cd O ~ ~ O i•r ..V•i '+~ Q N b 2 rn N ~ a ~ > Z d ui °' o E j ~ d a o a Z ~~ ._ . _ .~ .t; ,r .,~~ ~~~ ~. ,'. ~: ~~t ~. . ~. I~ _ r_, (f. 1 x', .. .) ~ F;: ~~ ~ - ~~ "' i ~ .~ ~ ; ~~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ,~ ~~~ 1 ., ~ ,~ . „~ t~ ' , ~ , }~ ~~ I ~ ~ ~ 1 ~, ! ~ , ~..- {~. Z O Q~Z~tu v~ ~WVWH ~~~~~ =~¢¢v C Proposed General Fund Expenditures Dollar Budget Proposed Increase Percent FY 1989-90 FY 1990-91 .~Decreasel Chance General Administration $ 1,082,620 $ 1,155,12 $ 83,507 7.7oo Constitutional Officers 4,721,243 4,577,291 (43,952) (.9)% Judicial Adrnir:istr~aii~~n 175,745 153,8h'~ (11,878) (5.8)% Management ~~~~I~~~ice~ 2;59:~,SS1 2,518,244 25,593 1.0% Public Safety 5,59?,3:2 6 77,a,l3 980,511 17.2% Community ~iPttir;F:~.S ~r,041,595 ~~.t?S ,c"~~~5 51^;2`.?0 15.1% Human fiel~~~E:~;;i E:,91 ?.,335 7,.?t58,2-i6 356,950 S.2% Transfer ~~ l~e,b; 5,392~69c~ :~,3~'3,9`~S ~~s,701) (•2)'~0 Transfer t~~ c;~l,ital. 901,43 401,1:5 (`00,2~3t?) (SS.S)% Transfer t~, ~{s.~hoc~ls 28,537,9::0 30.?x.3.230 2,03S,2z~0 7.3% Non-Dep~~~Y:~ental 2,~U0,13? 35050:.."27 F.~0,3'~ 38.7% Total C~ya r~':ral hand _.____ _ _ ._. __._~ ___.__.. Ea-n~ ~~f ~ t;iT es ~-~ CMTY SvCS ~ CE`1ELOP PUBLIC SAFE ~ ~a~ ~: JVC~~Ii~~-~, HJ~I!i ill .C~.t. _ ~ t \\\\ '>i i ~~fT~UCf7J ~~~,P I T~1~ i l (I ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~~~~"~ ~ ' Ci~IV h~Ml lv i. ~ /, , ~// / i / ~~~~J~~ ~ i~//~//~//~~~~/~~,'I /~~~/ //,///~! j~%///~//rig r~ T / / , ,~,.,~„-, ,,//~ Y ~~ ~~ % Budget Highlights -~,- - ~ _ : • ~`nf ~ .;ho ~ 1s will mr et ~~ exceed the state salary mandate for tea%her:, b}~ prcvi '. -g an a~, ~ ~..~ pet..~± i~1~7ease: fog 17lStI.1 ~Aonal personnel. The schools have alsa ~~ru1c':ed 30 *te;v school ~,: ~,= ~ ., a.I; a~~~.~ ~gc .`.'.2 p,er;,F;nt s +-r~~ iin~-ease for non-instructional personla.~:l, a_.ld ~~.Kl~~nd~~d the r>: ?rr.:~.,'~ir~r !J.,~povt Prey%~;ntian 1:`-ugI'am. 1, .}•,~x~~,~ . ~ r-~ ~.r,~l-'~~ ~~1: ~i'he l.-roYosed hudget includes funding foA cl.e leas; /x~u.rc,ti~..~. of two •~--•ks anc. enou~,~ carts tc expand both the automate;l t c;fixse nl;,k-~ip a r ~~~ t.~ begin . ~~ .~ C ~:'a a :. 4. .',,. °r_ ~,~~,r -~;.~ p',~•~Rf; pro~,.~anh 'Tta.° prol.:otied recycling program is aut.:;ipa';ed t~~ cu~~eY ~`:~°'~`~ of the ,, <-_.~.,lic ",.moiety: In additiol~ to esta~alishir?g ~~~ new?y approved Police Department, the bv.,~ -~ ;provides •'-- ~.inding of five additional police ~~~s~.~a°:<, :3nd four paid parar-~~,die:/firetr~,k~tez »o ~~~ :~s, two at T(1T a.aa. i~er. iviountain aI-id trio in Vinton. ~~ Marc-'.: a s; ;~,~,t v-^.~ental ~',~rkln ~::,r,`s C.;rirlpers~.ti,~a ~°:..__~y has been proposeu fnr the volunteers at a ~~w 7f $a;,R7S. Economic Development: Twe°ds, the Southwest Iaadus4~aal Park, anc~ an ec~no~1c d~~.=elc~prent project to be named at a later date have been included in the FY 19~-7~-'~1 budget for ~: ~i~t=-~ ~~ommitment to economic development in the amount of $172,155. It is imperative that the County improve the _...... ,.r _....:as...;.,~ «„ ti,,,~;.,occ .~.- },ace rn avniri „ndue ~ burden on the individual taxpayer. A ratio IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII,r1J ~ ~ -_ ..- - I `~ i . ran., } f. ~....~ ~, ~ / - - ~ "P.. ~ ~ CE RE UE ST ~.~.' .. ~~' APPEARAN Q = . R~f.n ~ ~ ~ , ~ , ~ ,~i ~~`~ ~ eft ~ „ ~~ ~ .. ~ ~ ~.~ .., ~NIi~~ ~~dt;;~1r ~Jyn ~;~a -_ 1 \j" ~° _~ ~w-.~ri ~" Meew~+~MIE~ ~ -~ = AGENDA ITEM NO. ~'~" ''~~ _ - \ - r ~~ - SUEJECT ~ - = I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to = recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter = _ - so that I may comment.WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, - I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE - _ _ - RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINE - _ - LISTED BELOW. __ _ • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment _ __ whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will c decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, = and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the ma~onty of the Board to - - - - do otherwise. - _ • Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Ques- bons of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. =_ • All comments must be directed to the Boazd. Debate between a recognized __ speaker and audience members is not allowed. • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. • Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. _ __ • INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED '-' GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION = FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT - _ THEM. - PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO DEPUTY CLERK -_ c E /~ ~ (2- I C ~-C Gc~3/~`- ~ -c -_ NAM _ - _ _ - - = ADDRESS ~ ~ ~ ( ~ to ~ ~ `. i ( - - - - - - - - - PHONE ~ ~ - ~--~- = c mllililllilllllllllllllllllllllllllillilllllilllllllllliillllllllllllllllllllllilillllllliilllllllillillllliilllilllllillllllllll IIIIIIIIIIilllllllllllllllillillllllillllllllllilllllillllillllllillllllllllllllllllllllllllllilllllllllllllllll1111111,1,111111111 WII , ,~ ~ _ _ ~ _ PPEARANCE REQUEST A _ - _ - - - - - - _ _ _ ~ - __ AGENDA ITEM NO. c ~~ " _ _ ~ _ - SUBJECT L_.~~t r ~ , r ~ j. .{ - . ,~ . ~4..~y.,_., c _ _ __ _ °_ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to reco nine me during the public hearing on the above matter _ so that I ma comment.WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, c - _ - _ I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR TH c c _ _ _ RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINE _ _ c = LISTED BELOW. 'Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment '- whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, -' and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Boazd to c = e do otherwise. c _ • S Bakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Ques- p =_ bons of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. _ • All comments must be directed to the Boazd. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. _ -_ • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. akers are re uested to leave any written statements and/or comments • Spe q with the clerk. '- __ • INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED = GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT ... _ - i = THEM. _ _ _ _ PLEASI~ PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO DEPUTY CLER _ - _ - _ - _ ~ ~ ~'' , NAME '~ ° ~'~ l' . ~,, ~ - _ - _ _ ~~ r"q "" "~' ~ ~ ADDRESS / ~' ~-f ~ ~ x r ~ `~: ~ ~' _ - _ _ - _ - _ - _ - '"' PHONE ~~`` _ - _ - mlllllllililliilllllllllllllilllllllllililll~llliiillilllliillilllllllllllllllllillililllllillllllllllllilllllllllllllllllllllil IIIIIIIilllllililllllllllllllllllllillillilllllllllllllllllllillllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll.1111;1:111111111111111111! j~illlllllill _ __ _ _ ',..lay, ...:~~ _ - - ~- CE RE VEST = APPS ARAN Q = _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - ~ _ = AGENDA ITEM NO. _ _ _ _ ,, ~ _ _ ~. - .. .,~~.~ _ - ~ ~~ - - -_ SUBJECT ~, ; ; ~ ~. ~ y t ~_ _ _ = I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to _ _ reco nize me during the public hearing on the above matter g WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, so that I may comment. _ _ _ _ I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FORT _ RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINE _ _ _ _ _ LISTED BELOW. _ • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment _ "~ whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will = decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, _ will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to c and = __ do otherwise. _ • S eakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Ques- __ -_ tons of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. c _ • All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized __ '"' speaker and audience members is not allowed. _ • s eakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. = Both c -_ p - • Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments _ c with the clerk. ___ • INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT _ _ THEM. i _ _ PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY A D GIVE TO DEPUTY CLERK __ _ 1~ ^ '_ NAME `~~`~ ,' ~-;-''' .~a~~.~ ,,~~,~ ,- _ _ ~..,. , s __ ~ a ~ as O` }' ~ = ADDRESS ~" ~ ~_ ~~ ' J ~ PHONE ;~ ~ ~~ ~ ` ~~~ _ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 mlllllll IIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIiIIII1IIIIiIIIIIIIIIIIIIiIIIIIIIIIIIIIIiiIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII~IIIIIII~IIIIIIIIIl1 jlllllllll ,, ~ _ _ _ r r;~' ~~.~ VEST APPEARANCE RE Q = _ _ _ _ _ _ -_ - .~ _ ~ ~~ - _ - - AGENDA ITEM NO. f G ~~ - _ _ - - ,-~ ~ ~ ~ n ~ C.G. _' _ _ _ _ - SUBJECT ~~ ~ - _ _ - I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to _ __ - reco nize me during the public hearing on the above matter _ - WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, - so that I ma comment. - - - I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR T _ _ ~" RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINE c c -_ LISTED BELOW. • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment _ whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will - decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, __ -' nd will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to - a do otherwise. c _ • S eakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Ques- p °_ bons of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. _ • All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized __ speaker and audience members is not allowed. =_ __ -_ • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. - _ • S eakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments - p c with the clerk. -_ -_ • INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION '~ FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT - - _ a - a ,= THEM. s PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO DEPUTY CLERK ~. .~ ~~ / (~~ ` ~~r~ I ~ ~WVI ~°/ NAME ~ i~ ~C~ y1 - - ... -~ ` - ('. F---~ -_ ADDRESS ~ c1 l I S ~~`" `~ - ,_ PHONE . s ~. ~~ Iliillilllllilllllllllllllllllllllillllllllillllllllillllllllllllllliillilillllllllliillillllllllllllllllllllilllllllll mlllll ~,~'~' IIIIIIilllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllilllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll111111~111111111 -_ -_ yt', E VEST `~~ APPS ARAN CE R Q _ - - - - - - - - - - _ _ - 90_ - - AGENDA ITEM NO. _ _ _ _ SUBJECT - - - __ I would like the Chairman of the t3oard or ~upervisu~, ~o _ reco nize me during the public hearing on the above matter WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, so that I may comment. _ - _ -' I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FORTH - - _ RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINE - _ LISTED BELOW. • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment ,,. whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, =_ c and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to _ '- do otherwise. _ • Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Ques- tions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. • All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized __ speaker and audience members is not allowed. • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. • re re nested to leave any written statements and/or comments _ Speakers a q =_ c with the clerk. -_ __ • INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED c GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION "~ FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT - i THEM. _ _ _ PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO DEPUTY CLER - - _ _ - - i~~ y _ - - NAME "`~ c ~ ~ - _ ,~ - ~~.-~,. :f-~,' ADDRESS ~• fl ~ ~ ~ PHONE ~3~ ~ Z ~ ~'" Iilililiilllilllllllllllllillllillllillllllilllllllllllllllliillillllllllllliiilllllllllllllllllllllllllllllilllllllllllllll ml iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiyiiiiiii~ W , ~~ ~ _ _ _ _ _ _ E ,~ ~. _ .~. = VEST ~~..~....~ ~,~, _ APPEARANCE RE Q _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ AGENDA ITEM NO. _ - _ _ _ - SUBJECT ~j~~d ~ ~~~~ ~'~ _ - _ _ - I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to = reco nize me during the public hearing on the above matter _ WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, = so that I may comment. - _ _ _ I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR T - = o - RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINE _ - __ LISTED BELOW. • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment = whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will c decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, '- and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Boazd to - .., - do otherwise. - eskers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Ques- t • tions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. = Debate between a recognized c • All comments must be directed to the Boazd. _ = speaker and audience members is not allowed. - • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. • Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments - -_ c with the clerk. - __ _ • INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED = - GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION __ FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT - - THEM. - PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO DEPUTY CLERK - 1c1~-~ - - NAME ~~ ~ ~- ~~ ... - = ADDRESS l~o~-Ja l .- -__ _ -_ = PHONE c m~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ __ ., _ _ ~...9'~,.. I ~ ~ ~ ~~ APPEARANCE REQUEST - _ - - - - - - -_ -_ - - - J/ - ~J ~ i. f AGENDA ITEM NO. T ~ ~~ _ - _ - - - - -_ SUBJECT _ - I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to = recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter _ so that I may comment.WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, - - I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR TH _ _ RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINE _ - LISTED BELOW. __ c • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment = whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will c decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. c _ • Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Ques- bons of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. • All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. =_ • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. • Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments c with the clerk. __ c =_ • INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. = PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO DEPUTY CLERK _ - __ - _ ~~ ¢ 5 ~~ ~ ~ fjg NAME ~ ~,~. ;~ ~ :a~;t,~ _ ,, _ ~ ~ ~~~ _ ~.~ ~~_ ADDRESS ~ -' _ ... : ~ PHONE ~..~ . ~ ~, ~~ ~ ~ - m~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ j~Jilllllllllllllllllllllllllllilllllllllllllllilillllllllllllllllilllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllilllllllllllllll IIIIIIIIIIIIIIi~,(J - _ - - - - _ _ _ _ APPEARANCE RE UEST {~ `~~~~ ....~ - Q - - - - - __ __ - - AGENDA ITEM NO. -- ~ - _ _ - -_ _ SUBJECT ~f __ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so that I may comment.WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW. =_ • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, c s and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. __ • Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Ques- bons of clarification may be entertained by the Chauman. • All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. c • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. • Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments p with the clerk. • INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED c GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. ~, PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO DEPUTY CLERK mllllllllllllillllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllilllllllllilllllllllllllllilllllllllilllilllllllillllllllllllllllllllllllllllllilm _ _ _ ~ _ _ - _ - _ ~ _ _ .~~. - _ ~, _ PPEARANCE RE VEST _ A Q _ _ _ _ _ - - _ _ = AGENDA ITEM NO. - _ _ __ .~ _ SUBJECT V ~ " ~ ~ ~ r-+ ~ - _ = I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so that I may comment.WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, _ I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE - RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES = __ LISTED BELOW. __ _ • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. - - _ _ _ • Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Ques- bons of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. • All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. _ _ =_ • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. • Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments = __ with the clerk. __ • INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED _ GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION __ FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. - PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO DEPUTY CLERK _ - _ -_ _ ~ - NAME ~.J'2 L ~. ~ ~~ i c c ADDRESS '~/ ~S ~ --~ `~ PHONE ~1 ~3 ~ ~ 9 ~- ''~ ~ 'i ~ m~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ u~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~u~ r. _ _ _ _ APPEARANCE REQUEST .a~;~ ~:::~ ~~ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ :~ _ AGENDA ITEM NO. "~~'~ ~' `'~ _ _ ,.,. suB1ECT ~ ~ ..~ _ _ _ _ _ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supex~isors to reco nine me durin the public hearingg on the above matter =_ g g ALLED TO THE PODIUM, - so that I ma comment.WHEN C ILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE IW RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES s LISTED BELOW. __ _ _ • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, -_ and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. _ __ _ • Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Ques- bons of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ,_ • All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. _ • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. • Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments c = with the clerk. - • INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FQR AN ORGANIZED = GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION = FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT 'THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO DEPUTY CLERK __ NAME Pa.m K~~-,-~-~z_~-~h~~e~.,'' lam` l.c.i'1 C.1 ~ ~, ~ ~ . ra rn u..tvj ~t7,~ S vXV1 C N S ~ ~_ ~ J = ADDRESS t-? ~ . ~cx- ~`~~' t~cx_~,~~-~..~ U `:~ 4cx~- _ _ ~. PHONE ~ ~ ~ - C 13i mllllllllllllllllllilllllillllllllllllllllll IIIIIIillillllllllllllilllllllllllllllililiillllllllllllillllllillllllllilllllllllll IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII,~1 W I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I t'- ~, ~ ;;':c~; ~ ~~~ ~ ~~~ ~.~,~. _ . _ - _ - _ ~ ..~~ _ _ _ PE ARAN CE RE QUE S ~ a = _ _ - AP _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ AGENDA ITEM NO. _ _ - _ _ _ SUBJECT ~~~ _ __ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to _ nine me durin the public hearing on the above matter _ g _ reco WHEN CALLED TO THE PODI c so that I may comment. _ _ _ I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FORT _ c _ RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINE _ _ LISTED BELOW. _ __ • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment _ c whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, =_ will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Boazd to and - _ =_ do otherwise. _ eskers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Ques- S _ _ • rions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. _ ... • All comments must be directed to the Boazd. Debate between a recognized __ c speaker and audience members is not allowed. _ _ __ • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. s: _ -" • Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments -- __ with the clerk. _ • INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT c THEM. - PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO DEPUTY CLERK __ __ = NAME ~~ ~- STS _ __ ~ PP ~~~ ~. ~. ~~~ ~~b6~ ADDRESS _ ,_ ~ - _ ~'~ ~ Q~~ = PHONE - . _ - _ Iillllllllllllllllllllllilllll I I I IIIIIilllllllllllllilllllllllliilllilllllllllllllllllllllillllllllliillllllllllil miillillllll ~iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiieiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii~ _ _ - - - - - - - - - - APPEARANCE RE VEST _ Q _ - - - - __ __ - - AGENDA I EM O. D ~s~ r ~r yr- f ~ ~?~ ~ ,~ ~~ .m - ~f = = SUBJECT for r? ~~~;; -- ry r ~r ' yi(,~: '~~~,~~~ ~~ ~>`s',~~r '~ ~t °°~~ -f~ .. _ ~_ ~' I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so that I may comment.WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW. __ • Each s esker will be iven between three to five minutes to comment =_ whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to __ do otherwise. • Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Ques- tions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. • All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. • Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments =_ with the clerk. c • INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED c GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT c THEM. ~_ i PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO DEPUTY CLERK _ - m~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~m - - ~ ' # ~ ~ ~ - :l~ ~ - ~~ ~ - - - ANCE RE UEST APPEAR Q _ - _ - - _ _ _ _ _ - AGENDA ITEM NO. _ _ _ - _ SUBJECT~~~1 a~1 vse v~r o ~ T~~~o~r ~ ~~ _ - - - - - - - I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter - so that I may comment.WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, - - - I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR T - - RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES - - - _ - = LISTED BELOW. • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment = whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will c - decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, = and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the ma~onty of the Board to = do otherwise. - = • Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Ques- tions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. - - • All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. __ • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. __ • Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. - =_ • INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED = GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT - _ - - = THEM. - PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO DEPUTY CLERK _ __ _ ~.~.,y - - - NAME ~T9~~PY % ~ - - - - - '" ADDRESS l 7~ ~-I G~QfI icl,0~ ~ ~ O ~~~ ~ - ~~e- 2tf olS - - - - - 0 -_ -_ PHONE 3 <~ ~ - S-G ~ ~ m~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~., y AT A REGULAR MiETY VIRGINIA,E HELD AT THE PROANOKE COUNT ~ANOKE ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY APRIL 24, 1990 ORDINANCE 42490-11 ADOPTING A NEW SET OF ZONING REGULATIONS PERTAINING TO THE DISPLAY OF SIGNAGE WITHIN ROANORE COUNTY,It~ULATIONSIPERTAININGDTOGTHERDISPLAYIOFISIGNSNING WHEREAS, the Roanoke County 1985 Comprehensive Development Plan recommended the update of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance, and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission did appoint a Roanoke County Sign Subcommittee to prepare draft recommendations pertaining to the display of signage in Roanoke County; and, WHEREAS, the Commission did receive the recommendations of the Sign Subcommittee in July 1989, and did review and study these recommendations, making modifications where deemed by the Commission to be appropriate; and WHEREAS, on November 9, 1989 the Roanoke County Planning Commission did hold a public hearing in accord with Section 15.1- 431 of the Code of Virginia, as amended; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on March 13, 1990; the second reading and public hearing was held on April 24, 1990; and WHEREAS, legal notice for the public hearing was provided as required by law; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors finds that the adoption of these signage regulations is necessary and expedient in order to secure and promote the health, safety and general welfare of the inhabitants of the County, since signs directly affect the appearance, aesthetics and vitality of the community, the 1 enhancement and preservation of property values, traffic safety, and the value of the County's industrial, commercial, residential, and agricultural areas. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the Zoning Ordinance of Roanoke County is hereby amended by repealing the following: Section 21-93 Signs. (REPEALED IN ITS ENTIRETY) Section 21-20 Words and Phrases The following words and phrases are REPEALED: Administrator Sign Sign Structure Section 21-22-5 R-MH Manufactured Housin Combined District I, (e) (REPEALED IN ITS ENTIRETY) Section 21-23-3 B-3 S ecial Commercial District B. Signs (REPEALED IN ITS ENTIRETY) 2 2. That the Zoning Ordinance of Roanoke County is hereby amended by adding the following: Section 21-20 Words and Phrases The following words and phrases are added to Section 21- 20 of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance: AGRICULTURAL PRODUCT SIGN Any sign displayed for the purpose of advertising agricultural products produced on the premises where the sign is displayed. ATTACHED SIGN Any sign that is affixed directly to a wall, roof, canopy, awning, marquee, mansard wall, parapet wall, or porch of a building, and whose face is parallel to the building element to which it is attached. Attached signs have only one face visible from a public right-of-way. AWNING A shelter constructed of nonrigid materials on a supporting framework, either freestanding, or projecting from and supported by an exterior wall of a building. AWNING SIGN A type of attached sign painted on, printed on, or otherwise affixed to the surface of an awning. BANNER A temporary sign applied to cloth, paper, flexible plastic, or fabric of any kind. BUSINESS SIGN A sign which directs attention to a profession or business conducted, or to a commodity, service activity or entertainment sold or offered, upon the premises where the sign is located, or in the building to which the sign is affixed. CONSTRUCTION SIGN A temporary sign identifying an architect, developer, builder, general contractor, subcontractor, material supplier, and or financing entity participating in construction on the property on which the sign is located. 3 DIRECTIONAL SIGN Any_sign displayed for the direction and convenience of the public, including signs which identify rest rooms, location of public telephones, public entrances, freight entrances or the like. ESTABLISHMENT Any business or other land use permitted by this ordinance for which a sign permit may be requested. FREESTANDING SIGN A sign which is supported by structures or supports in or upon the ground and is independent of any support from any building. GLARE A bright light which is unnecessarily cast on to property due to direct transmission, refraction, or reflection. HISTORIC SITE SIGNS A sign erected and maintained by a public agency, or non-profit historical society, that identifies the location of, and provides information about, a historic place or event. HOME OCCUPATION SIGN A sign associated with home occupation uses as provided for elsewhere in this ordinance. IDENTIFICATION SIGN A permanent on-premises sign displaying only the name of a subdivision, multi-family housing project, shopping center, industrial park, office park, church, school, public or quasi-public facility or similar type use. ILLUMINATED SIGN Any sign with an artificial light source incorporated internally or externally for the purpose of illuminating the sign. MONUMENT SIGN A freestanding sign affixed to a structure built on-grade in which the sign and the structure are an integral part of one another. OFF-PREMISES SIGN Any sign which directs attention to a 4 message, or business, commodity, activity, service or product not conducted, sold, or offered upon the premises where the sign is located. These signs may also be known as location signs, billboards, outdoor advertising signs, or general advertising signs. ON-PREMISES SIGN Any sign which directs attention to a business, commodity, activity, service or product conducted, sold, or offered upon the premises where the sign is located. POLITICAL CAMPAIGN SIGN A sign relating to the election of a person to public office, or a political party, or a matter to be voted upon at an election called by a duly constituted public body. PORTABLE SIGN A freestanding temporary sign that is designed to be moved easily, and is not permanently affixed to the ground. PROJECTING SIGN A sign that is affixed directly to a wall, roof, canopy, awning, marquee, mansard wall, parapet wall, or porch of a building, and whose face is roughly perpendicular to the building element to which it is attached. SHOPPING CENTER A group of commercial establishments planned, constructed and managed as a total entity with shared access, customer and employee parking provided on-site, provision of goods delivery separated from customer access, aesthetic considerations, and protection from the elements. SIGN Any device, structure, fixture or placard using graphics, symbols, and/or written copy designed specifically for the purpose of advertising or identifying any establishment, product, goods, service, or activity. SIGN HEIGHT The vertical distance measured from grade to the highest portion of the sign or sign structure. 5 SIGN SETBACK The minimum distance required between any property line and any portion of a sign or sign structure. SIGN STRUCTURE The supports, uprights, bracing or framework of any structure exhibiting a sign, be it single faced, double faced, v-type or otherwise. SUSPENDED SIGN A sign that is suspended from a wall, roof, canopy, awning, marquee, mansard wall, parapet wall, or porch of a building by means of brackets, hooks or chains, and the like, and whose face is roughly perpendicular or parallel to the building element to which it is attached. TEMPORARY SIGN Any sign structure which is not permanently affixed to the ground, a building or other structure, and/or an on- premise sign applying to a seasonal or brief activity such as, but not limited to, summer camps, horse shows, yard sales, Christmas tree sales, business promotions, auctions and carnivals. For the purposes of these regulations, on-premises real estate signs and signs displayed on active construction projects shall be considered temporary when displayed in accordance with Section 21-93 (J). ZONING ADMINISTRATOR The Zoning Administrator of Roanoke County, Virginia, or an authorized agent thereof. For the purposes of the Zoning Ordinance, also known as the Administrator. Section 21-93 Signs. Add the following as Section 21-93 of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance: Section 21-93 SIGNS A. PIIRPOSE These sign regulations are intended to define, permit and control the use of signs. They have been established by the Board 6 of Supervisors of Roanoke County to achieve the following community goals and objectives: (1) To protect the health, safety, and welfare of the public. (2) To promote the economic growth of Roanoke County by creating a community image that is conducive to attracting new business and industrial development. (3) To distribute equitably the privilege of using the public environs to communicate private information. (4) To permit reasonable legibility and effectiveness of signs and to prevent their over-concentration, improper placement and excessive height, bulk, density, and area. (5) To promote the safety of persons and property by requiring that signs not create a hazard due to collapse, fire, decay, or abandonment. (6) To ensure that signs do not obstruct fire-fighting efforts, and do not create traffic hazards by confusing or distracting motorists or by impairing drivers' ability to see pedestrians, obstacles, or other vehicles or to read traffic signs. (7) To provide for the reasonable advertising of business and civic products and services, with recognition of the effects of signage on the character of the community. (8) To control visual clutter, and encourage high professional standards in sign design and display. (9) To establish clear procedures for the administration and enforcement of this ordinance. B. DEFINITIONS (1) Definitions pertaining to provisions of these sign regulations may be found in Section 21-20 of this ordinance. 7 (2) Graphic representations of sign designs and terminology may be found in Section 21-93 (R) of this ordinance. These graphics should be viewed as illustrative examples only, and are not intended to be inclusive of all sign designs. C. PERMITTED SIGNS-GENERALLY (1) Any sign displayed in Roanoke County shall be in accordance with: (a) All provisions of Section 21-93 of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance; and (b) All applicable provisions of the Roanoke County Building Code, as adopted, and all amendments thereto; and (c) All applicable state and federal regulations pertaining to the display of signage. (2) If any two or more sections of the above referenced regulations are in conflict, the provision that provides the most restrictive standard shall apply. D. EXEMPTED SIGNS (1) The following signs shall be exempted from regulation, and may be displayed within Roanoke County without obtaining a sign permit. However, an electrical permit shall be required for any sign requiring or incorporating electrical service: (a) Official traffic signs or similar regulatory devices owned, erected and maintained by a duly constituted governmental body. (b) Signs required to be displayed or maintained by law or governmental order, rule or regulation. (c) Memorial tablets or signs, provided they are displayed by a public or quasi-public agency. 8 (d) Directional signs provided that each such sign does not exceed five (5) square feet. per sign, and no such sign shall contain any advertising matter. (e) Street address signs, not exceeding ten (10) square feet in size. (f) Non-illuminated signs, not more than three square feet in area warning trespassers or announcing property as posted. (g) Signs displayed on a truck, bus, or other vehicle while in use in the normal conduct of business. This section shall not be interpreted to permit the parking for display purposes a vehicle to which a sign is attached or the use of such a vehicle as a portable sign. (h) Flags and insignias of any government except when displayed in connection with commercial purposes. (i) On-premises real estate signs in residential or agricultural zoning districts not exceeding five (5) square feet in area, or on-premises real estate signs in commercial or industrial zoning districts not exceeding sixteen (16) square feet in area. On-premises real estate signs larger than these exempted allowances may be installed as temporary signs in accordance with Section 21-93 (J) (2). (j ) Clocks that display time and temperature through the use of mechanical means or the controlled display of lights, provided these devices do not display any other message. (k) Political campaign signs provided that they are located outside of the public right-of-way, and are removed within fourteen (14) days after the campaign. (1) Signs displayed between Thanksgiving and Christmas 9 associated with the sale of Christmas trees and wreaths. (m) Signs on the inside of establishments, except those signs specified in sections 21-93 (E)(1) (h) and (k), which shall not be excluded. (n) On-premises agricultural product signs associated with the seasonal and/or incidental sale of such products on property where the primary land use is residential or agricultural, provided such signs do not exceed four (4) square feet in area. E. PROHIBITED SIGNS (1) The following signs are prohibited within Roanoke County: (a) Any sign that due to its size, location, color, or illumination obscures a sign displayed by a public authority for the purpose of giving traffic or safety instructions or directions. (b) Any sign that contains or consists of pennants, ribbons, spinners, or other similar moving devices. (c) Any sign, except an official public notice, which is nailed, tacked, posted, or in any other manner attached to any utility pole, or structure supporting wire, cable, or pipe; or to public property of any description. (d) Any sign located within a public right-of-way, except for signs displayed by a duly constituted governmental authority. (e) (Reserved) (f ) (Reserved) (g) (Reserved) (h) Flashing or revolving lights, or beacons intended to direct attention to a location, building or service, or any similar device otherwise displayed that imitates by its design or 10 use, emergency service vehicles or equipment. (i) (Reserved) (j) Any sign that simulates an official traffic sign or signal, and which contains the words "STOP", "GO", "SLOW", "CAUTION", "DANGER", "WARNING", or similar words. (k) Any sign or portion thereof that rotates, or otherwise moves through the use of electrical or wind power. This prohibition does not include the changing of messages on electronic message boards. (1) Signs advertising activities or products that are illegal under federal, state, or county law. (m) Any sign that obstructs any building door, window, or other means of egress. (n) Any electrical sign that does not display the UL, ETL, CSA, or ULC label, unless such sign is constructed, installed, and inspected in accordance with Section 21-93 (K) (2). (o) Signs or sign structures that are erected on, or extend over, a piece of property without the expressed written permission of the property owner or the owner's agent. (p) Any sign that due to its size, location or height obstructs the vision of motorists or pedestrians at any intersection, or similarly obstructs the vision of motorists entering a public right-of-way from private property. F. SIGN PERMITS (1) Except as provided in Section 21-93 (D), no sign may be erected or displayed in Roanoke County without an approved sign permit. Applications for a sign permit may be obtained from the Roanoke County Department of Planning and Zoning. Signs that are 11 not visible from a public right-of-way do not have to conform to the provisions of 21-93 (O) DISTRICT REGULATIONS, and the square footage of such signs shall not be included when calculating allowable signage on a lot. (2) Any owner of a parcel of land upon which a sign is to be displayed, or any authorized agent of such owner may apply for a sign permit. (3) Every application for a sign permit shall include a sketch of the property indicating the lot frontage. The application shall also indicate the square footage of all existing signs on the property, and the area, size, structure, design, location, lighting, and materials for the proposed signs on the property. In addition, the Zoning Administrator may require that the application contain any other information that is necessary to ensure compliance with, or effectively administer, these regulations. (4) A non-refundable sign permit fee is due and payable with the filing of a sign permit application. More than one sign on one building or group of buildings located on the same parcel of land may be included on one application provided that all such signs be applied for at one time. (5) After the issuance of an approved sign permit, the applicant may install and display any such sign or signs approved. Once installed, the Zoning Administrator may inspect the sign(s) for conformance with the approved sign permit and this ordinance. If the displayed sign(s), due to size, location, height, or number do not conform to the information on the approved sign permit, or the applicable standards of this ordinance, the Zoning 12 Administrator shall notify the applicant in accordance with Section 21-93 (G). (6) Any sign permit issued shall be null and void if any sign for which the permit was issued is not installed in accordance with the permit within six (6) months of the date the permit was approved. (7) Maintenance, repair, or restoration of nonconforming signs shall be in accordance with Section 21-93 (M). If the value of such work exceeds fifty (50) percent of its replacement value, it shall only be authorized after the approval of a sign permit application. G. ENFORCEMENT (1) The Zoning Administrator shall have the responsibility for enforcing the provisions of this ordinance. The Zoning Administrator may, as necessary, solicit the assistance of other local and state officials and agencies to assist with this enforcement. (2) Property owners, sign permit applicants, and/or establishment owners/managers, as applicable, shall be notified in writing of violations of the provisions of this ordinance. The Zoning Administrator shall, in the notice of violation, state the nature of the violation, the date that it was observed, and the remedy or remedies necessary to correct the violation. The Zoning Administrator may establish a reasonable time period for the correction of the violation, however in no case shall such time period exceed 15 days from the date of written notification. (3) If the violation is not corrected within the time period specified in the first notification, a second written notice shall 13 be sent. The second notification shall request compliance with these provisions within a period not to exceed seven (7) days. (4) If the Zoning Administrator is not able to obtain compliance with these provisions in accordance with the procedures outline above, civil and/or criminal procedures may be initiated in accordance with County law. H. MEASUREMENT OF SIGN AREA (1) Sign area shall be calculated as follows: (a) The area of a suspended, attached, or projecting sign, where the letters, numerals, or symbols are on a sign surface which is hung or affixed to a structure, shall be the total area of the hung or affixed surfaces. (b) The area of an attached sign where the sign consists of words, symbols, or numerals painted on or affixed to a wall, fence, or other building element shall be the entire area within a continuous perimeter enclosing the extreme limits of each word, group of words, symbol, numeral, groups of symbols, or groups of numerals, where the symbols or numbers are meant to be read as a unit. (c) The area of a freestanding sign shall be the total area of all surfaces (excluding poles or other support structures) visible from the public right-of-way. For double or multi-faced signs, only the area of surfaces visible at any one time, at any one point on the public right-of-way shall be measured when calculating sign area. (d) The area of monument-type freestanding signs shall be determined by (1) the size of the copy area, (2) visual breaks in the structural components of the sign, and/or (3) variation in 14 the monuments color scheme. (2) In situations where these criteria do not provide guidance in determining sign area, the zoning administrator shall determine the size of the sign. I. CALCULATION OF ALLOWABLE SIGN AREA ON CORNER LOTS (1) On corner lots, the front shall be either (a) the side fronting the street providing major access, or (b) the side which the main entrance of the structure faces. In situations where neither of these methods clearly distinguishes the front, the Zoning Administrator shall make a determination. (2) For commercial or industrial uses, the front shall not be a primarily residential street. (3) On corner lots where a building or buildings face more than one street, sign area shall be allowed for front lineal footage as indicated in the district regulations, and for one half the side street frontage, provided: (a) The side street does not front on a primarily residential area; (b) Sign area as determined by each frontage is placed only on the frontage from which it is determined. J. TEMPORARY SIGNS (1) Any person wishing to display a temporary sign must apply for a sign permit pursuant to Section 21-93 (F). Except as provided in Sections (2) and (3) below, pertaining to real estate and construction signs, temporary signs shall comply with the following standards: (a) Each business or use on a lot shall be allowed to display a temporary sign a maximum of four (4) times per calendar 15 year. No business may display temporary signage for more than one hundred twenty (120) days per calendar year. Businesses that wish to display temporary signage in excess of these provisions may apply for a permanent sign permit which shall be evaluated against the applicable district standards. (b) Only one portable sign may be displayed on a lot or at a shopping center, at any one time. Any portable sign displayed shall have a minimum sign setback of 40 feet from the centerline of any public right-of-way, or 15 feet from any front property line, whichever is greater. (c) No business or establishment shall display more than two temporary signs simultaneously and the total square footage of any temporary signs displayed at one time shall not exceed sixty (60) square feet. (2) Real estate signs greater than sixteen (16) square feet in commercial or industrial zoning districts or greater than five (5) square feet in agricultural or residential zoning districts may be installed on a lot provided that each such sign does not exceed ninety-six (96) square feet in area, and has a minimum sign setback of fifteen (15) feet from any public right-of-way. All real estate signs must be removed within 14 days after the property has been sold or leased. (3) On premises construction signs may be installed on active construction sites. No construction sign shall exceed ninety-six (96) square feet in area. Any such sign must have a minimum sign setback of fifteen (15) feet from any public right-of-way. All construction signs must be removed from a construction site prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the building or 16 project . R. ILLUMINATED SIGNS (1) Signs may be illuminated either through the use of backlighting or direct lighting provided the following standards are met: (a) Information on any illumination proposed as part of a sign must be provided by the applicant on the sign permit application. (b) (Reserved) (c) No light from any illuminated sign shall cause direct glare into or upon any building other than the building to which the sign is related. (d) No light from any illuminated sign shall cause direct glare on to any adjoining piece of property, or any adjoining right-of-way. (2) Any sign containing electrical components shall conform to current UL, ETL, CSA, or ULC standards and display a label from one of these recognized testing labs; or as an alternative, shall be designed and constructed to standards that would allow one of the above referenced labels to be affixed and thereafter inspected by Roanoke County to insure compliance with these standards. L. PROJECTING AND SUSPENDED SIGNS (1) No projecting or suspended sign shall extend more than six (6) feet from any wall or other structure to which it is affixed, nor shall any such sign have a setback of less than fifteen (15) feet from the nearest public right-of-way. (2) The bottom edge of any projecting or suspended sign must be at least seven (7) feet above the ground if located above any 17 publicly accessible walkway or driveway. (3) No projecting or suspended sign shall project or suspend over an adjoining lot, without the expressed written consent of the adjoining property owner. M. NONCONFORMING SIGNS (1) Nonconforming Signs-Generally. Any sign which was lawfully in existence at the time of the effective date of this ordinance which does not conform to the provisions herein, and any sign which is accessory to a nonconforming use, shall be deemed a nonconforming sign and may remain except as qualified in section (2), below. No nonconforming sign shall be enlarged, extended, structurally reconstructed, or altered in any manner; except a sign face may be changed so long as the new face is equal to, or reduced in height, sign area, and/or projection. (a) The addition of lighting or illumination to a nonconforming sign, shall constitute an expansion of a nonconforming structure, and shall not be permitted under these regulations. (2) Removal of Nonconforming Signs. Nonconforming signs may remain, provided they are kept in good repair, except for the following: (a) Damage or destruction of a non-conforming sign. A nonconforming sign which is destroyed or damaged to the extent exceeding fifty (50) percent of its replacement value shall not be altered, replaced or reinstalled unless it is in conformance with these sign regulations. If the damage or destruction is fifty (50) percent or less of its replacement value, the sign may be restored within ninety (90) days of the damage or destruction, but shall not 18 be enlarged in any manner. (b) Damacre or destruction of use ._ A nonconforming on- premises sign shall be removed if the structure or use to which it is accessory is destroyed or demolished to the extent exceeding fifty (50) percent of the principal structures value. (c) Chancre of Zoning. Whenever a change of zoning occurs by petition of the owner, contract purchaser with the owner's consent, or the owner's agent upon a lot which contains a nonconforming on-premises sign, such sign shall not be permitted without being modified in such a manner as to be in full compliance with these sign regulations. (d) Reserved N. DAMAGED OR NEGLECTED SIGNS (1) The Chief Building Official of Roanoke County shall have the authority to order the removal, without compensation, of any sign or sign structure that due to neglect or damage poses a clear danger to the health, safety and welfare of the public. O. DISTRICT REGULATIONS (1) A-1 ZONING DISTRICT (a) Lots within an A-1 district shall be allowed a maximum signage allocation not to exceed one-quarter (.25) square foot of sign area per 1 lineal foot of lot frontage. The following signs shall be allowed in the A-1 District subject to the regulations contained herein: BUSINESS SIGNS Each permitted business in an A-1 district shall be allowed a maximum of fifty (50) square feet of sign area, provided that the total signage on the lot does not exceed the allowable maximum as defined in (a) above. Businesses that request 19 sign permits for lots that meet or exceed their allowable sign allocation shall be allowed a maximum of twenty-five (25) square feet of signage. IDENTIFICATION SIGNS A maximum of thirty (30) square feet shall be allowed per use. HOME OCCUPATION SIGNS A maximum of two (2) square feet shall be allowed per home occupation, or group of home occupations within one home. HISTORIC SITE SIGNS A maximum of fifteen (15) square feet shall be allowed per sign. TEMPORARY SIGNS Temporary signs shall be allowed in accordance with Section 21-93 (J). (b) No freestanding sign shall be allowed on any lot having less than two hundred (200) feet of lot frontage. The required minimum separation for freestanding signs on a lot or lots under single ownership or control shall be 250 feet. No freestanding sign shall be located within fifteen (15) feet of any other freestanding sign on an adjacent or adjoining lot. (c) Any freestanding sign erected must have a minimum sign setback of 4o feet from the centerline of any public right- of-way, or 15 feet from any front property line, whichever is greater. (d) No freestanding sign shall exceed fifteen (15) feet in height. (e) No establishment shall be allowed more than four (4) signs. (2) RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT REGULATIONS (a) Lots within R-E, R-1, R-2, R-3, R-4, R-MH, R-5, and 20 R-6 districts shall be allowed a maximum signage allocation not to exceed one-quarter (.25) square foot of sign area per 1 lineal foot of lot frontage. The following signs shall be allowed in the R-E, R-1, R-2, R- 3, R-4, R-MH, R-5, and R-6 Districts subject to the regulations contained herein: BUSINESS SIGNS Each permitted business in a residential district shall be allowed a maximum of thirty (30) square feet of sign area, provided that the total signage on the lot does not exceed the allowable maximum as defined in (a) above. Businesses that request sign permits for lots that meet or exceed their allowable sign allocation shall be allowed a maximum of twenty- five (25) square feet of signage. IDENTIFICATION SIGNS A maximum of thirty (30) square feet shall be allowed per use. HOME OCCUPATION SIGNS A maximum of two (2) square feet shall be allowed per home occupation, or group of home occupations within one home. HISTORIC SITE SIGNS A maximum of fifteen (15) square feet shall be allowed per sign. TEMPORARY SIGNS Temporary signs shall be allowed in accordance with Section 21-93 (J). (b) No freestanding sign shall be allowed on any lot having less than two hundred (200) feet of lot frontage. The required minimum separation for freestanding signs on a lot or lots under single ownership or control shall be 250 feet. No freestanding sign shall be located within fifteen (15) feet of any other freestanding sign on an adjacent or adjoining lot. 21 (c) Any freestanding sign erected must have a minimum sign setback of 40 feet from the centerline of any public right- of-way, or 15 feet from any front property line, whichever is greater. (d) No freestanding sign shall exceed ten (10) feet in height. (e) No establishment shall be allowed more than two (2) signs. (3) B-1 OFFICE DISTRICT REGULATIONS (a) Lots within a B-1 district shall be allowed a maximum signage allocation not to exceed one-half (.5) square foot of sign area per 1 lineal foot of lot frontage. The following signs shall be allowed in the B-1 Office District subject to the regulations contained herein: BUSINESS SIGNS Each permitted business in a B-1 district shall be allowed a maximum of five hundred (500) square feet of sign area, provided that the total signage on the lot does not exceed the allowable maximum as defined in (a) above. Businesses that request sign permits for lots that meet or exceed their allowable sign allocation shall be allowed a maximum of twenty- five (25) square feet of signage. IDENTIFICATION SIGNS Identification signs shall be subject to the same regulations as business signs within this zone. HISTORIC SITE SIGNS A maximum of fifteen (15) square feet shall be allowed per sign. TEMPORARY SIGNS Temporary signs shall be allowed in accordance with Section 21-93 (J). (b) No on-premises freestanding sign shall be allowed 22 on any lot having less than one hundred (100) feet of lot frontage. The required minimum separation for freestanding signs on a lot or lots under single ownership or control shall be 250 feet. No freestanding sign shall be located within fifteen (15) feet of any other freestanding sign on an adjacent or adjoining lot. (c) Any freestanding sign erected must have a minimum sign setback of 40 feet from the centerline of any public right- of-way, or 15 feet from any front property line, whichever is greater. (d) No freestanding sign shall exceed fifteen (15) feet in height. (e) No establishment shall be allowed more than two (2) signs. (4) B-2 GENERAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT REGULATIONS (a) Lots within a B-2 district shall be allowed a maximum signage allocation not to exceed one and one-half (1.50) square feet of sign area per 1 lineal foot of lot frontage. The following signs shall be allowed in the B-2 General Commercial District subject to the regulations contained herein: BUSINESS SIGNS Each permitted business in a B-2 district shall be allowed a maximum of five hundred (500) square feet of sign area, provided that the total signage on the lot does not exceed the allowable maximum as defined in (a) above. Businesses that request sign permits for lots that meet or exceed their allowable sign allocation shall be allowed a maximum of twenty- five (25) square feet of signage. IDENTIFICATION SIGNS Identification signs shall be subject to the same regulations as business signs within this zone. 23 HISTORIC SITE SIGNS A maximum of fifteen (15) square feet shall be allowed per sign. TEMPORARY SIGN8 Temporary signs shall be allowed in accordance with Section 21-93 (J). (b) No on-premises freestanding sign shall be allowed on any lot having less than one hundred (100) feet of lot frontage. The required minimum separation for freestanding signs on a lot or lots under single ownership or control shall be 250 feet. No freestanding sign shall be located within fifteen (15) feet of any other freestanding sign on an adjacent or adjoining lot. (c) Any freestanding sign erected must have a minimum sign setback of 40 feet from the centerline of any public right- of-way, or 15 feet from any front property line, whichever is greater. (d) No freestanding sign shall exceed twenty-five (25) feet in height. (e) No establishment shall be allowed more than five (5) signs. (5) B-3 SPECIAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT REGULATIONS (a) Lots within a B-3 district shall be allowed a maximum signage allocation not to exceed two (2.0) square feet of sign area per 1 lineal foot of lot frontage. The following signs shall be allowed in the B-3 Special Commercial District subject to the regulations contained herein: BUSINESS SIGNS Each business in a B-3 district shall be allowed a maximum of five hundred (500) square feet of sign area, provided that the total signage on the lot does not exceed the allowable maximum as defined in (a) above. Businesses that request 24 .sign permits for lots that meet or exceed their allowable sign allocation shall be allowed a maximum of twenty-five (25) square feet of signage. IDENTIFICATION SIGNS Identification signs shall be subject to the same regulations as business signs within this zone. HISTORIC SITE SIGNS A maximum of fifteen (15) square feet shall be allowed per sign. TEMPORARY SIGNS Temporary signs shall be allowed in accordance with Section 21-93 (J). (b) No on-premises freestanding sign shall be allowed on any lot having less than one hundred (100) feet of lot frontage. The required minimum separation for freestanding signs on a lot or lots under single ownership or control shall be 250 feet. No freestanding sign shall be located within fifteen (15) feet of any other freestanding sign on an adjacent or adjoining lot. (c) Any freestanding sign erected must have a minimum sign setback of 40 feet from the centerline of any public right- of-way, or 15 feet from any front property line, whichever is greater. (d) No freestanding sign shall exceed twenty-five (25) feet in height. (e) No establishment shall be allowed more than five (5) signs. (6) INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICT REGULATIONS (a) Lots within M-1, M-2, and M-3 districts shall be allowed a maximum signage allocation not to exceed one and one- half (1.5) square feet of sign area per 1 lineal foot of lot frontage. 25 The following signs shall be allowed in the M-1, M-2, and M- 3 districts subject to the regulations contained herein: BUSINESS SIGNS Each business in an industrial zoning district shall be allowed a maximum of three hundred (300) square feet of sign area, provided that the total signage on the lot does not exceed the allowable maximum as defined in (a) above. Businesses that request sign permits for lots that meet or exceed their allowable sign allocation shall be allowed a maximum of twenty- five (25) square feet of signage. HISTORIC SITE SIGNS A maximum of fifteen (15) square feet shall be allowed per sign. IDENTIFICATION SIGNS Identification signs shall be subject to the same regulations as business signs within this zone. TEMPORARY SIGNS Temporary signs shall be allowed in accordance with Section 21-93 (J) (b) No on-premises freestanding sign shall be allowed on any lot having less than one hundred (100) feet of lot frontage. The required minimum separation for freestanding signs on a lot or lots under single ownership or control shall be 250 feet. No freestanding sign shall be located within fifteen (15) feet of any other freestanding sign on an adjacent or adjoining lot. (c) Any freestanding sign erected must have a minimum sign setback of 40 feet from the centerline of any public right- of-way, or 15 feet from any front property line, whichever is greater. (d) No freestanding sign shall exceed twenty-five (25) feet in height. (e) No establishment shall be allowed more than five 26 (5) signs. P. SPECIAL SIGNAGE DISTRICTS AND REGULATIONS (1) OFF-PREMISES SIGNS Off-premises signs shall be allowed in the B-2, B-3, M-1, M-2 and M-3 Districts provided the following location and design standards are met: (a) No off-premises sign shall be located within a five hundred (500) foot radius of an existing off-premises sign, or an off-premises sign for which a valid permit has been obtained, but has not yet been erected. (b) No off-premises sign shall be located within two hundred (200) feet of any residential zoning district, public square, park, school, library, or church. (c) No off-premises sign shall be allowed to be installed on any roof structure, nor shall any such sign exceed 35 feet in height above the abutting road. (d) Side by side, double and multi-decker off-premises signs shall not be permitted. (e) Any off-premises sign must have a minimum sign setback of 40 feet from the centerline of any public right-of-way, or 15 feet from any front property line, whichever is greater. Any off-premises sign shall have a minimum side and/or rear yard setback of fifteen (15) feet. (f) The maximum size of any off-premises sign on a lot shall be 378 square feet plus 10% for embellishments. (2) USE NOT PROVIDED FOR PERMITS In conjunction with the approval of any Use Not Provided For Permit, the Board of Supervisors, after consideration of the advice and recommendation of the Planning Commission, shall impose sign limitations for the 27 use as may be deemed appropriate. Prior to acting, the Planning Commission and the Board shall consider the nature of the use, its public display and advertising needs, and the impact of any signage scheme on the character of the surrounding area. (3) PLANNED DEVELOPMENTS A signage plan shall be submitted as part of any proposal for a Planned Unit Development (PUD) or a Planned Commercial Development (PCD) as authorized elsewhere in this ordinance. The signage plan shall be part of the required preliminary development plan. All signage plans shall be of sufficient detail to allow the Commission and Board of Supervisors to judge the compatibility of the proposed signage with the character of the proposed PUD or PCD. At a minimum, all signage plans shall provide information on the general size, location, style, color, and materials of all signs proposed. In evaluating the PUD or PCD proposal, the Commission and Board shall consider the appropriateness of the proposed signage plan in relation to the character of the proposed development, and the surrounding area. (4) AIRPORT IMPACT ZONES The allowable height of signs within any established Airport Impact Zone shall be governed by the height restriction for that zone, or the height restriction imposed by the applicable district regulation, whichever is more restrictive. (5) SITE DEVELOPMENT PLANS Site development plans for new commercial and industrial development projects shall show the general location of any freestanding sign proposed. Site plans shall be designed so that freestanding signs may be placed on a lot in a location that conforms to these provisions. (6) LOTS WITHOUT PUBLIC STREET FRONTAGE Lots without public street frontage that existed upon the effective date of this 28 ordinance shall be allowed signage based upon the applicable district regulations as provided for in Section 21-93 (O) of this ordinance. Permitted signage shall be calculated based upon the frontage width of the lot that parallels the nearest public street. Q. VARIANCES (1) Requests for variances to these sign regulations shall follow the procedures outlined in Section 21-123 (B) of the Zoning Ordinance. The Board of Zoning Appeals, in considering any variance request, shall follow the guidelines of this section, and Section 15.1-495 of the Code of Virginia, (1950), as amended. The power to grant variances does not extend to an economic hardship related to the cost, size or location of a new sign, or to the convenience of an applicant, nor should it be extended to the convenience of regional or national businesses which propose to use a standard sign when it does not conform to the provisions of this section. R. GRAPHICS (1) The graphics incorporated herein are provided as illustrative examples of various sign types and sign related terminology used in this ordinance. As such they are not intended to be inclusive of all sign designs. 3. Severability The sections, paragraphs, sentences, and clauses of this ordinance are severable, and if any phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph, or section of this ordinance shall be declared unconstitutional, or invalid by the valid judgement or decree of a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs, and sections of this ordinance shall remain valid. 29 4. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect on and after the date of its adoption, April 24, 1990. On motion of Supervisor McGraw to adopt ordinance as amended by staff and including Supervisor Johnson's amendments, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Yj'~Q~.~, Jam/ Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Terry Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning John Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator Arnold Covey, Director, Development & Inspections Phillip Henry, Director, Engineering Tim Gubala, Director, Economic Development Paul Mahoney, County Attorney Skip Burkart, Commonwealth Attorney Magistrate Sheriff's Department Roanoke Law Library, 315 Church Avenue, S.W., Rke, 24016 Main Library Roanoke County Code Book Roanoke County J&D Court, Intake Counsellor 30 1 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. ~ ~' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: April 24, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: Second Reading and Public Hearing; An ordinance adopting a new set of zoning regulations pertaining to the display of signage within Roanoke County, and amending or repealing certain existing regulations pertaining to the display of signs. I COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR' S COMMENTS ,,r a~•ti -vim! J .,~~,~,~~ m:~ ~ .. ~~~~-~ ~.-r-~' -fir j~ ,.~..~ ~~ ~, /~ ti~~-rte ':=~%~~ .:-~l~c~ ~-t~.~-,-~ .~rc~~r a .~,~ a~ ~ ~` vrt~-rte" y'`" - ~" ~~- ~°~ c-~-o BACKGROUND' `~`'`~ 'r'~' First reading of this ordinance was held on March 13, 1990. At that time the Board requested that the Director of Planning evaluate several recommended changes to the March 13th draft as proposed by representatives of the sign industry. Between March 13th and April 17th, the County Administrator, Director of Planning and several other members of the staff met with sign industry representatives on three different occasions to discuss and negotiate changes to the draft. This report, with attachments, summarizes these negotiations. Attached to this report are the following documents: 1. The original comparative matrix presented to the Board by the sign industry representatives on February 27, 1990. This matrix compared our existing sign regulations with the recommendations of the sign subcommittee, and the Planning Commission. It also contained the sign industries recommended changes. 2. A new matrix that summarizes the results of the staff's negotiations with the sign industry representa- tives. This matrix is entitled Summary Comparison of Negotiated Chanaes ~9a- .~' 2 3. A revised ordinance, dated April 24, 1990, that incorporates changes resulting from the negotiations. The remainder of this report summarizes the negotiations, focusing on the specific provisions discussed. SUMMARY OF NEGOTIATIONS: The Summary Comparison indicates that fifteen different sign ordinance provisions were discussed and negotiated with the sign industry representatives. Of the fifteen, the staff completely agreed with seven of the sign industry's recommendations (47 percent). Compromises were proposed and agreed to on an additional three provisions (20 percent). No agreement was reach on five of the sign industry's recommended changes (33 percent). The five areas where no changes are proposed are: (1) Number of temporary portable signs allowed on a lot at one time; (2) Freestanding sign lot frontage and separation requirements; (3) Maximum number of signs allowed per business; (4) Allowing general advertising signs in B-1 office zones; and (5) Establishing special provisions to allow off-premises real estate advertising signs. Each of these areas is discussed below. (1). Number of Portable Signs Allowed on a Lot The April 24th draft provides that each lot of record within the County may display one portable sign at a time, regardless of the lots size or frontage. The sign industry had proposed that each business on a lot of record be allowed to display a portable sign at the same time. The staff disagreed with this recommendation because it would allow multiple portable signs to be displayed in shopping centers, office parks, and/or other developments within the County where more than one place of business existed on a single lot. As an example, a development such as Tanglewood Square or the Brambleton Corporate Center would be allowed as many as 18 portable signs at one time. Multiple signs displayed at one time increase the visual clutter on a property. In addition, this type of temporary sign often interferes with a drivers visibility due to the size and placement of the sign. Many times these signs are placed within required parking spaces, decreasing the supply of available parking on a lot. (2) Frontage and Separation Requirements for Freestanding Signs The proposed ordinance requires a lot to have a minimum of 100 feet of street frontage before a freestanding sign is allowed. The sign industry proposed that any lot of record, regardless of its frontage be allowed a freestanding sign. The 100 foot minimum requirement achieves a desired separation of freestanding signage. It reduces the visual clutter and confusion caused by having too x/90 _ ~ 3 many signs in close proximity to each other. The sign industry expressed a concern that this requirement would prohibit landlocked parcels that lacked any frontage from having any visible signage. To address this legitimate concern, the staff proposed, and added Section 21-93 (P) (6). This section provides that such parcels are entitled to sign allocations based upon the same standards that apply to parcels that front on a public street. The sign industry also recommended that freestanding signs on the same lot be required to have a minimum of a 100' separation. For some zoning districts, this is a more lenient standard than is found in our current regulations. The proposed 250' separation will, in the opinion of the staff, allow businesses the necessary sign visibility, while at the same time encourage the coordination of sign designs and displays on a parcel of land. For comparative purposes, in evaluating the sign industry's proposal, the 100 foot separation would allow at least 12 freestanding signs on a project such as Promenade Park. The staff's proposal would permit five freestanding signs at this project. (3) Maximum Number of Signs per Business The ordinance provides that each business on a lot be allowed a maximum of 2 signs in a B-1 district, and a maximum of 3 signs in B-2 and B-3 districts. The sign industry requested that these limits be abolished. The staff's position in the negotiations was that three main separate provisions of the sign ordinance regulate sign display. These are (1) the front foot ratios that determine total signage on the property, (2) the maximum square feet of signage a business is allowed, and (3) the number of signs a business is allowed. As the staff agreed with, or compromised on, two of these three main provisions during the negotiations, we did not believe that the integrity of the ordinance could be preserved if this requirement was also eliminated. (4) Allowing General Advertising Signs in B-1 Office Districts. The sign industry proposed that billboards be allowed in our office districts. The staff did not believe that this type of signage was compatible with projects such as La Premiere, Colonade I and II, or future projects of this type constructed in B-1 districts. The draft ordinance allows such signs in B-2, B- 3, M-1, M-2, and M-3 districts. (5) Special Regulations For General Advertising Signs for Residential Real Estate Sales. A representative of the Roanoke Valley Homebuilders Association sat in on the negotiations and requested that the draft be amended to allow billboards in residential districts, if the billboards advertised the location of a proposed subdivision. The staff believed that this type of exception was not equitable, as it would favor the sale of one product over the sale of another. The draft was not amended to incorporate this change. Si9o-s 4 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: That the Board hold the public hearing and second reading on the proposed sign regulations, and adopt the regulations as contained in the April 24th, 1990 draft. Respectfully submitted, Terran a L. Ha rington Director of Planning and Zoning Approved by, '~ a~ (i• Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator Action Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by Eddy Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers Vote No Yes Abs :~~~ • • n .I Ni.. :r ~.~ r.\r l j-.~y-L/•~..•.~~~.4 Y.~.1~ r..r 1'~.. ~....~ s• t ......j.. ~rl i. -•. - .. ~ ... r... .;... sue. .:1.•. -•. .• ...~. ~r•... .. i. .. ../•~r • ... -/.. ~. ~ N, n cr r p• o n cn K3 A row a3 uv r N =< r uanN 0 4 0 4 •- 7- ~. O -~ 4 C -• R 7 -• r r 0 4 r -~ K r •- \ r O K J D 7 r' i0 7 3 3 4 `~ z , r r R 3 r r• C ~• O' D r K Cl D A r m N r• n 0 1 x C C7 u r• i •~ 7 r• 0, O l r, 011 O y r 3 0 `~ f 4 r 4 r \~ r• ~. ~O ,, 0 7 4 n N r• r , r• n O n ~ C 7 4 4 3 Q N r• •0 u 4 3 C I D 7 7 7 •+• r N u r• , 7 4 3 U r a v n O u 11 Ib a i r ~O U C r 0 rr , 4 D 3 rr , 4, O 4 O' C -•• r~ 4 7 7 1 r• ] D a `C 4 r -• O n N l r •- O C7 ~~ N 7 n r'4 ,.o D 4 a 0+ 0.0 ~+ C r <ur ~ r r* r~ 4 3 4 4 r. a r• N r K K 4 rr 3 r* , r 4 R r r , UI r• r• a 7 r• a r• 4 r 0• r• r r• K a 4 •~ r* 71 7 r• f 7 W 0 i0 7 i0 r , O< x 3 C R r 4 7 n 0 r• r* 4 r* + r~ 7 7 3 N ~• 4 r• 4 u 4 C u r• n r• rr -~ K O N 7 n r* 0 u r r• r• r- 3 U1 r. = 0 r• O 7 7 7 r w 4 r• rr x i0 0 0 a C ~0 0 i0 , 4 10 7 YI rr 0 7 0 r• ~ 7 f rr r 3 7 ] 7 a s 4 r• 7 rr 7 I 4 W `~ N ~ f ~ I 4 a u r 7 , ? 7 I N n 4 r rr~ acn r*0 .. O r m a 3 7O M D rrN ~~UI 0 0 4 4 7 0 +7 7 .-r r r c 4 ~ a rr 4 4 r• 7 D + 0 n 4 r• n `C x 3, 3 , ~ L ~O r• < C r. O Q• K, 0 7 IP r• O' r 0 rr r• 1 7 O r• 7 D 0 4 4 O f 3 4~ x f r x 4 i0 , r• r• 3 r 0 4 Q C, 4 r• x 4 u -+ C 4 rt 7 W O III , a C 3 r a n r 3 0 7 3 r•i0 D 0 4 rr Y1 0 , C 4 0' r 6 K4 0 , r rrr• n++• 3 3 ~ ar*C r 7 7 n ~. r 3 Q 0 7 0 ~ 4 rr r r u , K 4 R, r 4 7 rr 7 0 0 r- R R K 7 7 nC x 4 a tll N r• Q •w , <, M. r• ~ r 4 n r• r• N 4 3 r r 4 '< Q n v 4 4 u 3 N u n 4 ~•• r, r' ~ J 4 70 a, r. C r•~ 0 C u r• N`~ C 4 N W r r 4 i0 3 i0 r• 7 R 3 0 4, 7 K a 7 7 r r• 0 r. W 4 i0 N IP `~ r < , rr a r. 7 4 0 r• 4 r ~O n u 7 4 0 7 u N N r• nc r* J < r ~ V G 0 Q• ram c a n nc 3 D n 3 0 = n < N R~ A i r f1 o v 4 , 4 + o o r 4 r o 4 r~ o r 4, o r c o 4 \ 4 7 0 V D 0 ~• rr , n , x 7 r x ~- 7 r• , 4 3 ~• O' 3 N n a C C r• C < r• rr 1p r• rr 7 r• N , r• 0 ~r 7 r- O L C UI . 0 A 7 7 K r~ r. 7 4 D 3 r `< 3 4 -• 3 f 0 rr r r• 4 4 rr K< \~ ~ M rt l a r• 3 4 O' ~r 4 C n C , 4 r, r 7 ~ r• r 4 •0 -' `~ r 0 4 4 A ~~ 0 r 3 C r 3 rr 3 7 7 n N r* x 0 1~ r , 7 3 a r• 0 rr 4 rr , n 4 r- r N 4 r r C r r 7 D K r• 4 0 , O r• 3 0 3 7 7 3 K N r' O' ~- O a 7 a K 7 7 r N r +< r ~• L O n rr 4 r• 4 •-° r , r W i , K , 3 r. r• 4 x O 4 0 7 0 -'• 4 r K 7 r• 4 rr 0 K r .D ••r r r• A , M r- 7 r* = , ~ w 1O 7 N o n ~ x 7 0 Na 3 r r•0 , +• +< 4 p r- ] !Au 7 r YI r• 3 r 4 `< 3 r• •C 7 D r N 4 r• -- 4 O u rr A r• 7 7 i0 C K a a IA 3 M 7 r r• C„ C, ~ r 7 7 r0 0 ] 3 r +• 0 4 u O r• C C rr 4 4 a r• •~ r rD 4 C w 0 `~ ~i u r• 7, 4 U r 3 7 r• ~ •w K N a L u 7 w r ~0 l u+ r.-'•r =n 7 M 0 r• r. 4 U U 7 r• 7, 4 r ~ R 7 ~ 04 a r rru ~ 0 ~ N o a 4 ~ n na C A r rrr r 40 r• R ' 0 a ' ~~o o~o I mo 0 4 n, n, n, 3 n~ 4 31 1 3 A 3 A 7 ~ 3 4 '•' 3a 3a 3a r 0 3a r- 4 4 4 7 3 4 u J R 7 rr 7 R i0 r~ 7 K a 0 a 0 a 0 4 N a 0 0 r r r 4 r + Ku Ka Ku Ku r• r• r• r• r~ r• r• r~ 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 1 a u o r• r• r• r• K 7 7 7 7 r' a a a n r c c c c ~* u u u u K K K ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ""` ~ ~ -i, r 3 m 07 ~ N r O d .0 N N~ 3 O N O Ip ry 1 r I I I I L O -~ r' .. a N '~ C 7 r• N D A -~ r W N r ~. -~ •• O m N y 7 3 7 2 r• C N ar•N 3 rrD W W W N~ n rpr y~ RN £ j ry y 7 31 WNr r N N N N a 7• 0 K.O N O rr a 7 C N 0 0 0~ 0 r• r• r• r• K r• N r 7 -* r• a3 - OOON £ ~L~D~O i0 W O• O-• O£ r•~ y r. r. N l~ 7 7 7 7 C 7 O r. ~c N ..• 7 7 7 ; O' N N N N 3~ r• O N 7' ~ N N iO K W C ID r' r• r• r• x 7 7 0Oi. 9i ~ W 7 7 7 7 r• N rr 3 7 7 r• K •• ~• 3 3 N N ,09 7 W 3mtDlnC N 7 3 r•a N N N O N x I I I 13 Ip r• rr r• r WNr 7 rr7 O N - r. Ip ~D la 3 N 3 u n ND t.ar•O ~ uamrn 3 ~O 0 7 N 7 -~... r fi~ d ~ 7 < rtD I D Wr~3 ~ 7Narr•r9 `07N~ pNi N a- R y 3 E O N N 1P r 'L O O N a N N ~ 0 7 ~•' 0 r• £ O W N 1 W 7 01 7~~ Orr ~I N 3 rr W IUD 7 7, ~ m~•°< o~ o .D Ai ~ ID 3 i0 7 r a a 3 N 0 7 r• I7 -w pl 7 I 7 n Ip r•rrm o'Z ° :° o a ~ ~ m i R ~ ~ 7 K C O . 3 V l Ip r• 0 9 7 ~ N 3 ~. 3 O N 3 N W K 3 N N N 7 16 x Ip ~O x r W ID R rr Ip ID 7 ~,•• r, y N r• N O. 7 r N 0 rr rt m "• p 4 a i0 rr N 7 N ~ ~ p O. . O d d N 7 3 W 3 7 C ,, . 7 0 7 ~ ~ W ~ r N 0 N O' 0 0 rr7i0 . ' N 0< `~ W D 7 D C 7 N 7 < -• N N r• 7 ID ~r.3 ~• 7 7 7 ~ ~ N N ~ 7 ~ N ID r ~ ~ 0 I 0 N O •- N 7 3 K N N I N ~ 0 N 7 ~ rr rt ~ £ 3 N O' N N l ~ N D 30D0'D W W WND 0 r. 'S r 7 0 Y•J]0 r•7l ~ rt 3 D A~W C1 a C 0 Ip r• 7 N D~ I I C r r N ~• N N N N 3 ~ ~ 0 r• N f 1 r 7 a K - r 0 7 £ r r r r W ~O iODD x rt C 7'N r• N N O rDr 7 ~G 3 -~+ ~ N W `~ 3 W N Ai 7 7 7 7 r• N ~rp• ~ r• 7 rt ~ O ID W 7 .+ L I I N O' N N N N N 7 0. 7 M .•• Ip N N N ~ 3 N ~ 7 7 0 ~ 01 r• 3 •- O 7 7 7 7 -~• 3 3 N O C O. N< fL R 7 r• i• a- 3mI~0 W p 3mOO-* N~ 3 Ip .-•.~ r~ M N N ~r•10 7 R O I+• N •i. W W •• X I I I I •• ~ WNr ~•-' U S O ~ W N O O N rNr rNr 7 7 N 3 N ~ . 7 7 r ~ d N N W Ui C 3 N N 7 •. 1 p . r r. 01 N N 0 1 N N rr 7 rr1~ w7 ~p rr 0 O rr N N `< o~ N 7 N 0 ~ N N v N - i s m a• n ~ N • a r. DD ~ -~ 3 y a N I n ry 7 ~ ~ I rr I r •O rr tr W . 0 7 Z Z p n z 3 o C n~ ^ n v o m v ~ 7' 7 , r N O. 7 7 r N 3 , p ~ • a 0 N A ID ~ W N rt N 2 r• r• Ip 7 7 0 rr r• r• 7 a a rr G r• N 7 r r ~ N '`~/~® ~- ` ,• 6-.• y. -a.`, - a (~ ~r'*>.. < ..gat ...., . ... ., . ~ .. . _ .... _- . >~.'y. ....:,e+:.- - r , . .- .:.4~... e ~ : ~: .. ,.-..,. t'...::4 - .. : r.::, . w: : ,5.. N O a N a l L L r I a rr r• r C 7 7 A 0 V rr r ~• l r• w C m 9 fn '~ r N I ~0 I a N r• ~. N a l N~ l U ~ 3 1o a to o -- rr a n -- -+• D N -- n w~ N M -- 7 0 a ID ~-3 < N i, 7 N r• r• O 7rt~- 0 C O r•7 r• n r• 7 O •• -- ~. O N ~, K~ C ry N a l ~ O a~ N O' i0 ID O r' 0 r' N F" •• i0 1 N O' N N N a ~ ODD ~•RN N r• r• C IE a rrrrN r• r• 7 N MN N 0 D rtU1rfN 7 ~ r7 c to a 7 K .•• 7 0 ID r• ~ O O to D D Ip 7 r n K '~ R a 3 Ip a rr Ip N 7 7 r• .r a 0 7 a 7 7 a ~ W N 7 - i, N +. N ~ r• l r* N a n ~ ID 7 n N r• N ~ D N a N r•KN r•rtN N.0 N 7 a ~ -ti N~ 7 0 ~ d CA < .w~ 0 rr 0 rr i0 N O V N 7 7 •e D O r ~ R rt ID N r 1' ID 1 ~ ~ a, ID tD vw~.nN~on~ '{ a l ID r• r• Ip 7 to < o~ a< a a 3 N 3 C N ID r R r• l •- l 7 N rt N a a N 1 Ip r• r• rr K N N N N N ~D N r• ~ M N N7a0mar• ~ N 7 n rr a '1 0 N r• N N 0 r* ~* ~ a a 7 a77v 7 r•N rr cloaca r•r• n n Rn n~o a R a o 7 .- N 0 rr 7 N ~ N I ~ ~•-~ O• I ~ N a n cn ,oa a 7 3 ~. rrN rr a r• v 0 7 ~ 'sN0 aa< r• r• 7 r• N a7r• 7 0 n w7 N ~ N r Wa ~ N O Z O n 7 a 7 ~O m m 3 r• 7 a rt N a 7 ~o C a ~o N a r O cap ,+ 7 a 7 i0 r• 0 C 7 naa r•i0 7 rt m n K ID rr 0 7 r• .a7 rr n N D C D C a rr N .~ N r• 7 N N aRatr•Z r• 0 Ul 7 O N r• a n~~cn G ID 7 N 7 N N rf~ a Nv r•l 7 r• 7 ~c i0 o .- a m 7acn 7 N N I i0 r* n c ~ 0 a a ~ 3 •D i0 3 ~ Ip ~ IG N N 7 N av as -+. N a fT R fr IDar•0 ~ ~0 0 l 7 N N r r• N i0 a 7 N D r• .- i0 7 0 N E r• ~ 7 ? W N r a N 7 4 to < N N l rr r• N r• 7 i0 m a -o lan r < 0 N 7 N l r• 0 r* O' 7 r• r• m N rt N r• 7 ~0 i0 Ip 7 N 10 r• ~ ~o 7 N r 7 Z O n 7 a 7 m -~ QJ -ti m 0 w 0 N ,* .. rr .. O N 0 r -~ . -~ O U~ -w -~, ~ N ~ N 0 D O D 7 7 R-AR ~. a r+ a ~* i0 ~O m m v v ID 10 l ~ + ¢1 -+• ID 0 I 0 I 0 w 0 N rr rt .. 0 N O r ~, • ~. O cn l N ~ N 0 ~ O ~ 7 7 rr ~• rt -~• a R a r* ~o. ~• ID N ~ U N N n n Z D ID iD n n 0 N 3 N a a N 7 rt ao a K N r• r• 0 i0 7 7 r• 7 a N ff wa~tn ~ a 0 R rrt~a Wr~3 ~ ~ 0 r• ~• O N N Ib ono ~ ~ 0 7 ~ -aer-,'07 r+ a Ip 7 r~ n r~ 100 3~ aa3 M• Ip 7 M• 7 7 I n ID ~~N ry ryr• 0 ~ 7 9 10 8 N -y >>a yORiN r+ R K r~ r~ ~ 0 <K 7m N N A71a f1 SID 70 Nn aC A 0 7 ~ 3 ~ R O13D a~ 7 ~ D oa7a ~d r•3 arr7w -e r• ~0 7 rr 0 r~ 7 07 N oN a ~ area r• 7 -~ R 7 N 0 a ~ 7 N n ID f~ N G .•. rt N 0 2 ID i0 0 rt r• a r+ r, 0 7 N ~9D-S o mo m w x vw t`I i • i v~ 1~y ~ o ~i G K M O • M pWAOP mY 'X xMMID dl h ~ M b I+V7GJ I r O 1 1 1 / M /3 ~ O ~ ~ ~mp~N Nrp „ ruyy Y ~ • rAyMA Ips i i~+w O ~~~ r M C N N Y~ M N W YI Y1 • : M„ R•~ K ~ O ~~~~ ~ O8R~ 90 707 II+y ~ O KKK W MN ,~ piq X~ ~ a r M ~/-JM 1'A ~ ~ O K M O I N~ ~ W w MO r X • OK w r• •Y Y 7~Iq lfO bl '.CWIgW 67 •y~M m ^^^^^^ J r 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Y O h ~o h+ ryNr roar : MKMV1 rp ~ xPWN xNNr O CO~il ~I •h ~ N••• NOIg01 • r•OM OP¢E >K r xrrr XMMM 0/ 7 X MR r• ~ I~caw 1••s 1 •$g• s u~y~ ua•• w • 7• OI •11• Krt /- ••If0 •r N • N Y,1• ~ R ~ O -~ n mi ~c s ~ n ~ A n " w ~ A7W /r • /s s R W m m xY smmm o, of o~ ro • Ir 1111 a s s r ~ ra I+Wyr s i s i i~~ NWUN i i i N ••• A xm W~ai f/ n A O Y 1 N w r • • • m ~ o u 7 7 w VI <S C D HA ~ N 3 ~ ~ 0 s m°. 3t ~~ ~~ 'n -o d e e a~ p v? ~ M O M Q A ~ 1 `~ 1 ~ '~ ~ O C O ~ '~ N ~ $ $s s M e ~ 7 O. p ~s n ~ n 3 g» ». M 7 ,~ a s ,; _ .` ;.i~ .,.;ter .,. :.21i': , ~Z f ~: R• oeg '~ ~ ax '~ : • '~ ~ ~ ~ r ~L' iK i r ~ , r • ~ ~~Q7 ^ s R ~ O M ~ r v ~ ~ o ~ p. . ~ ~. i M •XW• 1 O D 't7p 6'X '•4 ~r • Keo sR . a ~ ~r ~ rw~rn ~wwwr~eee I iR • ~ Yel • M`~x~M ~ :: ~ 0 PP: + A~~~ t7~~ O •RM P ~ ~ • ~ N o r O~ ~ •• MN r p /P p • R R AR xy ~~ r Xr U-+Rr ~ ~ O re~ •R ~ ~ A~ iOK ~ y~O Y • a 7 R1 ~w K K~ r tlr ~-~Yr 7iR~r ~~O i~C ~O R,pr ~~ - OM'O O W ,X rK+~rp rpr•KrtrO •r ~o y 4r < r • •7 r !9•G r r Krr" r < Kr -~ < • Krr ~~ ~ ra -~ G a 7 ^ 07•~G PO~ RrK Rr R ee ~ KPr •r0 OK 7• p * 4KP O 7R R ! rYR-¢ a o ~ r • S ^r r ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~..~~pp K ~ . Yh + r ==06 ~ ~ ~O Oy ~ O R . n 0oih~rr p ~^ ~ ~~ ~ora »° M~ ar~ ~ r ~ r R a P~C, w K „ K ~M ~ ~q 0- Rr ~ ~ ay ` • A 7 ~ ~ 7 e • K w oo rr M CI~Mp~MOMX ~ ~ ~ '~,~.~ p ^ ~~Qp MR~f•x Of' AP ~ C r O ~.O~a ~6~c•C+ • •~• R r -•rnA~ AC r R „ 6R~ ~ K • w 'K~r Rf r^P ~ ~ 7 ~ P ~ ~ r • ~~Ma r O R~~ ~ W t -+Kr ~Ch7 r• -. r m ff m ~ . .r~ pA p A r'rr ~"~ p fi O S M= ~Mw-r' orX . r ~V ~p C p ~'~e`~o "'~ ~ g~~ ~ F . s f M. R rM 66 ~x ~P~r ~ ~ . 7 ~ ` ~" .~ ~ lKrf K ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ » ~ RRr ~,Pr~C • i1 ~ ~ ~ 7~ 3 i n ~ •i O Yl 'p 3 ~ `~ M ~ u ~ iK"~ ~`~ ` s n 9~ ~ • o g ~ : e~ ` d r c~_~3,°, r s 33 ~ r ; `~ i c • = i ~ ° n~•~~c ~ N ~ r ~ 7 ~ _ r ° ' ~;x:>> g ~ i ~» i 7 r r or~» ~ g ,~ .'r r ~ 3 r ~ ~~~~ 3~ i 0 o;a~° s .~ : scs ~ e r ~ ~- ~ i T `~ 'f 90 ti f ~ ... ' STS i ~S j~ y ax ~ 1 ; • ~ - M n ~~ h f • ~ O ~ M O n !T - + D ~ N~v ~~SO K01 ~~ rr~ ~w iM0 M tT OM u -r ~ O ~ a = ~ ~ gA ~ : o ~ n ~ ~•~~ C~ ~y ~ ~ ^ i 7 ~O ~% M :~ So g M 7 r o ~ n o b ~ ~~ • W • • ~K n• wooi~a oga r~a i~x ~ ~ y~x~x °r~w •goo ~ pr ~~O~A T ~PO~ r R RMOO~~ r C^ 'Cirr~rG~~ a~ _M u ~ A OOi •• no• • h M • M-~ • N R Ss~i o• • • M oG~i o• n • N ~~ g r E nnMR Og• OM• 000 e•7%~1n ~n• rr 70%Mn nMn~n• ~~ O D% o$ y •XRM q0M 7 s ~~7L10M ~S SOM <O r~ M O ~• rn h ~ n M ON r n ~M KOr • n~MO1 NyM MO.OrNt Apr G p o aL 1 Oi 4f O Q O M n ~ ~ y'J ~r~ a p 0-: ~ „n• pM ~7~ff ~~p ~7~r rr A ~a•••N~• t ~ M r• °x~r . a sna ~~ Mna i s a r cc ~s g u g~ c ~~ ~ u ; ~ ~ , ~ „a a MA• ~O % ~ '~ ~ p O'C! prp p'O i • M ~ tt M R~ •c •t OM ~ ~m ~°o NI O O m ,nN- ~m ~ c ~ ~ o ~ p~ ` o x ~ ~ ° ~ ~v o ? W a a ~ .. W s V N S° C N 3] Wi g a n ° N 33 W~ ~ N n w ~_ v° 0~ 3 ° a O M O ; 3 N s X O » y O •(7 .~ '• $~ 3 g 3 O N ~ ~ ~ > 00 _ - ~ a os g°' •~ ~N~ M s C w ~ ~ ~_ > 7 N C 7o • N •O ~ ~ 10 10 O ~ '°' d c N ~ N S~1C ~ ° Opp N ' tl~ ~~ ~ ~ i~J.'„ m ~ s r s c~ ° ~° •cs~~ 3 a g y ° g~ ° ~ 7a n s ~ g ~ ~M °~ ~ e e ~~ s .~ s . . , 1 ~ O ' ~ ~~ C ° b N' ,t w O i i O i a ~ o ° d ~ O ~ ^ ~ o • b i .O . .~. ~ 7 ~ ~ w s 4 ~ ~ ~ i b a v `C c i a M n >. .,. A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY APRIL 24, 1990 ORDINANCE ADOPTING A NEW SET OF ZONING REGULATIONS PERTAINING TO THE DISPLAY OF SIGNAGE WITHIN ROANOKE COUNTY, AND REPEALING OR AMENDING CERTAIN EXISTING ZONING REGULATIONS PERTAINING TO THE DISPLAY OF SIGNS. WHEREAS, the Roanoke County 1985 Comprehensive Development Plan recommended the update of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance, and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission did appoint a Roanoke County Sign Subcommittee to prepare draft recommendations pertaining to the display of signage in Roanoke County; and, WHEREAS, the Commission did receive the recommendations of the Sign Subcommittee in July 1989, and did review and study these recommendations, making modifications where deemed by the Commission to be appropriate; and WHEREAS, on November 9, 1989 the Roanoke County Planning Commission did hold a public hearing in accord with Section 15.1- 431 of the Code of Virginia, as amended; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on March 13, 1990; the second reading and public hearing was held on March 27, 1990; and WHEREAS, legal notice for the public hearing was provided as required by law; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors finds that the adoption of these signage regulations is necessary and expedient in order to secure and promote the health, safety and general welfare of the inhabitants of the County, since signs directly affect the appearance, aesthetics and vitality of the community, the 1 enhancement and preservation of property values, traffic safety, and the value of the County's industrial, commercial, residential, and agricultural areas. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the Zoning Ordinance of Roanoke County is hereby amended by repealing the following: Section 21-93 Signs. (REPEALED IN ITS ENTIRETY) Section 21-20 Words and Phrases The following words and phrases are REPEALED: Administrator Sign Sign Structure Section 21 22 5 R-MH Manufactured Housing Combined District I. (e) (REPEALED IN ITS ENTIRETY) Section 21-23-3 B-3 Special Commercial District B. Signs (REPEALED IN ITS ENTIRETY) 2 ~~a ,~ ` 2. That the Zoning Ordinance of Roanoke County is hereby amended by adding the following: Section 21-20 Words and Phrases The following words and phrases are added to Section 21- 20 of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance: AGRICULTURAL PRODUCT SIGN Any sign displayed for the purpose of advertising agricultural products produced on the premises where the sign is displayed. ATTACHED BIGN Any sign that is affixed directly to a wall, roof, canopy, awning, marquee, mansard wall, parapet wall, or porch of a building, and whose face is parallel to the building element to which it is attached. Attached signs have only one face visible from a public right-of-way. AWNING A shelter constructed of nonrigid materials on a supporting framework, either freestanding, or projecting from and supported by an exterior wall of a building. AWNING SIGN A type of attached sign painted on, printed on, or otherwise affixed to the surface of an awning. BANNER A temporary sign applied to cloth, paper, flexible plastic, or fabric of any kind. BUSINESS SIGN A sign which directs attention to a profession or business conducted, or to a commodity, service activity or entertainment sold or offered, upon the premises where the sign is located, or in the building to which the sign is affixed. CONSTRUCTION SIGN A temporary sign identifying an architect, developer, builder, general contractor, subcontractor, material supplier, and or financing entity participating in construction on the property on which the sign is located. 3 «~ DIRECTIONAL SIGN Any sign displayed for the direction and convenience of the public, including signs which identify rest rooms, location of public telephones, public entrances, freight entrances or the like. ESTABLISHMENT Any business or other land use permitted by this ordinance for which a sign permit may be requested. FREESTANDING SIGN A sign which is supported by structures or supports in or upon the ground and is independent of any support from any building. GLARE A bright light which is unnecessarily cast on to property due to direct transmission, refraction, or reflection. HISTORIC SITE SIGNS A sign erected and maintained by a public agency, or non-profit historical society, that identifies the location of, and provides information about, a historic place or event. HOME OCCUPATION SIGN A sign associated with home occupation uses as provided for elsewhere in this ordinance. IDENTIFICATION SIGN A permanent on-premises sign displaying only the name of a subdivision, multi-family housing project, shopping center, industrial park, office park, church, school, public or quasi-public facility or similar type use. ILLUMINATED SIGN Any sign with an artificial light source incorporated internally or externally for the purpose of illuminating the sign. MONUMENT SIGN A freestanding sign affixed to a structure built on-grade in which the sign and the structure are an integral part of one another. OFF-PREMISES SIGN Any sign which directs attention to a 4 message, or business, commodity, activity, service or product not conducted, sold, or offered upon the premises where the sign is located. These signs may also be known as location signs, billboards, outdoor advertising signs, or general advertising signs. ON-PREMISES SIGN Any sign which directs attention to a business, commodity, activity, service or product conducted, sold, or offered upon the premises where the sign is located. POLITICAL CAMPAIGN SIGN A sign relating to the election of a person to public office, or a political party, or a matter to be voted upon at an election called by a duly constituted public body. PORTABLE SIGN A freestanding temporary sign that is designed to be moved easily, and is not permanently affixed to the ground. PROJECTING SIGN A sign that is affixed directly to a wall, roof, canopy, awning, marquee, mansard wall, parapet wall, or porch of a building, and whose face is roughly perpendicular to the building element to which it is attached. SHOPPING CENTER A group of commercial establishments planned, constructed and managed as a total entity with shared access, customer and employee parking provided on-site, provision of goods delivery separated from customer access, aesthetic considerations, and protection from the elements. SIGN Any device, structure, fixture or placard using graphics, symbols, and/or written copy designed specifically for the purpose of advertising or identifying any establishment, product, goods, service, or activity. SIGN HEIGHT The vertical distance measured from grade to the highest portion of the sign or sign structure. 5 SIGN 8ETBACR The minimum distance required between any property line and any portion of a sign or sign structure. SIGN STRUCTURE The supports, uprights, bracing or framework of any structure exhibiting a sign, be it single faced, double faced, v-type or otherwise. SUSPENDED SIGN A sign that is suspended from a wall, roof, canopy, awning, marquee, mansard wall, parapet wall, or porch of a building by means of brackets, hooks or chains, and the like, and whose face is roughly perpendicular or parallel to the building element to which it is attached. TEMPORARY SIGN Any sign structure which is not permanently affixed to the ground, a building or other structure, and/or an on- premise sign applying to a seasonal or brief activity such as, but not limited to, summer camps, horse shows, yard sales, Christmas tree sales, business promotions, auctions and carnivals. For the purposes of these regulations, on-premises real estate signs and signs displayed on active construction projects shall be considered temporary when displayed in accordance with Section 21-93 (J). ZONING ADMINISTRATOR The Zoning Administrator of Roanoke County, Virginia, or an authorized agent thereof. For the purposes of the Zoning Ordinance, also known as the Administrator. Section 21-93 Signs. Add the following as Section 21-93 of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance: Section 21-93 SIGNS A. PURPOSE These sign regulations are intended to define, permit and control the use of signs. They have been established by the Board 6 ~~~ w of Supervisors of Roanoke County to achieve the following community goals and objectives: (1) To protect the health, safety, and welfare of the public. (2) To promote the economic growth of Roanoke County by creating a community image that is conducive to attracting new business and industrial development. (3) To distribute equitably the privilege of using the public environs to communicate private information. (4) To permit reasonable legibility and effectiveness of signs and to prevent their over-concentration, improper placement and excessive height, bulk, density, and area. (5) To promote the safety of persons and property by requiring that signs not create a hazard due to collapse, fire, decay, or abandonment. (6) To ensure that signs do not obstruct fire-fighting efforts, and do not create traffic hazards by confusing or distracting motorists or by impairing drivers' ability to see pedestrians, obstacles, or other vehicles or to read traffic signs. (7) To provide for the reasonable advertising of business and civic products and services, with recognition of the effects of signage on the character of the community. (8) To control visual clutter, and encourage high professional standards in sign design and display. (9) To establish clear procedures for the administration and enforcement of this ordinance. B. DEFINITIONS (1) Definitions pertaining to provisions of these sign regulations may be found in Section 21-20 of this ordinance. 7 ~~ ~ .," ~" (2) Graphic representations of sign designs and terminology may be found in Section 21-93 (R) of this ordinance. These graphics should be viewed as illustrative examples only, and are not intended to be inclusive of all sign designs. C. PERMITTED SIGNS-GENERALLY (1) Any sign displayed in Roanoke County shall be in accordance with: (a) All provisions of Section 21-93 of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance; and (b) All applicable provisions of the Roanoke County Building Code, as adopted, and all amendments thereto; and (c) All applicable state and federal regulations pertaining to the display of signage. (2) If any two or more sections of the above referenced regulations are in conflict, the provision that provides the most restrictive standard shall apply. D. EXEMPTED SIGNS (1) The following signs shall be exempted from regulation, and may be displayed within Roanoke County without obtaining a sign permit. However, an electrical permit shall be required for any sign requiring or incorporating electrical service: (a) Official traffic signs or similar regulatory devices owned, erected and maintained by a duly constituted governmental body. (b) Signs required to be displayed or maintained by law or governmental order, rule or regulation. (c) Memorial tablets or signs, provided they are displayed by a public or quasi-public agency. 8 5~~~-; (d) Directional signs provided that each such sign does not exceed five (5) square feet per sign, and no such sign shall contain any advertising matter. (e) Street address signs, not exceeding ten (10) square feet in size. (f) Non-illuminated signs, not more than three square feet in area warning trespassers or announcing property as posted. (g) Signs displayed on a truck, bus, or other vehicle while in use in the normal conduct of business. This section shall not be interpreted to permit the parking for display purposes a vehicle to which a sign is attached or the use of such a vehicle as a portable sign. (h) Flags and insignias of any government except when displayed in connection with commercial purposes. (i) On-premises real estate signs in residential or agricultural zoning districts not exceeding five (5) square feet in area, or on-premises real estate signs in commercial or industrial zoning districts not exceeding sixteen (16) square feet in area. On-premises real estate signs larger than these exempted allowances may be installed as temporary signs in accordance with Section 21-93 (J) (2). (j ) Clocks that display time and temperature through the use of mechanical means or the controlled display of lights, provided these devices do not display any other message. (k) Political campaign signs provided that they are located outside of the public right-of-way, and are removed within fourteen (14) days after the campaign. (1) Signs displayed between Thanksgiving and Christmas 9 ~ ~ ~- . associated with the sale of Christmas trees and wreaths. (m) Signs on the inside of establishments, except those signs specified in sections 21-93 (E)(1) (h) and (k), which shall not be excluded. (n) On-premises agricultural product signs associated with the seasonal and/or incidental sale of such products on property where the primary land use is residential or agricultural, provided such signs do not exceed four (4) square feet in area. E. PROHIBITED SIGNS (1) The following signs are prohibited within Roanoke County: (a) Any sign that due to its size, location, color, or illumination obscures a sign displayed by a public authority for the purpose of giving traffic or safety instructions or directions. (b) Any sign that contains or consists of pennants, ribbons, spinners, or other similar moving devices. (c) Any sign, except an official public notice, which is nailed, tacked, posted, or in any other manner attached to any utility pole, or structure supporting wire, cable, or pipe; or to public property of any description. (d) Any sign located within a public right-of-way, except for signs displayed by a duly constituted governmental authority. (e) (Reserved) (f) (Reserved) (g) (Reserved) (h) Flashing or revolving lights, or beacons intended to direct attention to a location, building or service, or any similar device otherwise displayed that imitates by its design or 10 T~+ ~' use, emergency service vehicles or equipment. (i) (Reserved) (j) Any sign that simulates an official traffic sign or signal, and which contains the words "STOP", "GO", "SLOW", "CAUTION", "DANGER", "WARNING", or similar words. (k) Any sign or portion thereof that rotates, or otherwise moves through the use of electrical or wind power. This prohibition does not include the changing of messages on electronic message boards. (1) Signs advertising activities or products that are illegal under federal, state, or county law. (m) Any sign that obstructs any building door, window, or other means of egress. (n) Any electrical sign that does not display the UL, ETL, CSA, or ULC label, unless such sign is constructed, installed, and inspected in accordance with Section 21-93 (K) (2). (o) Signs or sign structures that are erected on, or extend over, a piece of property without the expressed written permission of the property owner or the owner's agent. (p) Any sign that due to its size, location or height obstructs the vision of motorists or pedestrians at any intersection, or similarly obstructs the vision of motorists entering a public right-of-way from private property. F. SIGN PERMITS (1) Except as provided in Section 21-93 (D), no sign may be erected or displayed in Roanoke County without an approved sign permit. Applications for a sign permit may be obtained from the Roanoke County Department of Planning and Zoning. Signs that are 11 ~'' -~ . not visible from a public right-of-way do not have to conform to the provisions of 21-93 (O) DISTRICT REGULATIONS, and the square footage of such signs shall not be included when calculating allowable signage on a lot. (2) Any owner of a parcel of land upon which a sign is to be displayed, or any authorized agent of such owner may apply for a sign permit. (3) Every application for a sign permit shall include a sketch of the property indicating the lot frontage. The application shall also indicate the square footage of all existing signs on the property, and the area, size, structure, design, location, lighting, and materials for the proposed signs on the property. In addition, the Zoning Administrator may require that the application contain any other information that is necessary to ensure compliance with, or effectively administer, these regulations. (4) A non-refundable sign permit fee is due and payable with the filing of a sign permit application. More than one sign on one building or group of buildings located on the same parcel of land may be included on one application provided that all such signs be applied for at one time. (5) After the issuance of an approved sign permit, the applicant may install and display any such sign or signs approved. Once installed, the Zoning Administrator may inspect the sign(s) for conformance with the approved sign permit and this ordinance. If the displayed sign(s), due to size, location, height, or number do not conform to the information on the approved sign permit, or the applicable standards of this ordinance, the Zoning 12 '~ ',~ " , Administrator shall notify the applicant in accordance with Section 21-93 (G) . (6) Any sign permit issued shall be null and void if any sign for which the permit was issued is not installed in accordance with the permit within six (6) months of the date the permit was approved. (7) Maintenance, repair, or restoration of nonconforming signs shall be in accordance with Section 21-93 (M). If the value of such work exceeds fifty (50) percent of its replacement value, it shall only be authorized after the approval of a sign permit application. G. ENFORCEMENT (1) The Zoning Administrator shall have the responsibility for enforcing the provisions of this ordinance. The Zoning Administrator may, as necessary, solicit the assistance of other local and state officials and agencies to assist with this enforcement. (2) Property owners, sign permit applicants, and/or establishment owners/managers, as applicable, shall be notified in writing of violations of the provisions of this ordinance. The Zoning Administrator shall, in the notice of violation, state the nature of the violation, the date that it was observed, and the remedy or remedies necessary to correct the violation. The Zoning Administrator may establish a reasonable time period for the correction of the violation, however in no case shall such time period exceed 15 days from the date of written notification. (3) If the violation is not corrected within the time period specified in the first notification, a second written notice shall 13 Lf!~L~ -' be sent. The second notification shall request compliance with these provisions within a period not to exceed seven (7) days. (4) If the Zoning Administrator is not able to obtain compliance with these provisions in accordance with the procedures outline above, civil and/or criminal procedures may be initiated in accordance with County law. H. MEASUREMENT OF SIGN AREA (1) Sign area shall be calculated as follows: (a) The area of a suspended, attached, or projecting sign, where the letters, numerals, or symbols are on a sign surface which is hung or affixed to a structure, shall be the total area of the hung or affixed surfaces. (b) The area of an attached sign where the sign consists of words, symbols, or numerals painted on or affixed to a wall, fence, or other building element shall be the entire area within a continuous perimeter enclosing the extreme limits of each word, group of words, symbol, numeral, groups of symbols, or groups of numerals, where the symbols or numbers are meant to be read as a unit. (c) The area of a freestanding sign shall be the total area of all surfaces (excluding poles or other support structures) visible from the public right-of-way. For double or multi-faced signs, only the area of surfaces visible at any one time, at any one point on the public right-of-way shall be measured when calculating sign area. (d) The area of monument-type freestanding signs shall be determined by (1) the size of the copy area, (2) visual breaks in the structural components of the sign, and/or (3) variation in 14 the monuments color scheme. (2) In situations where these criteria do not provide guidance in determining sign area, the zoning administrator shall determine the size of the sign. I. CALCIILATION OF ALLOWABLE SIGN AREA ON CORNER LOTS (1) On corner lots, the front shall be either (a) the side fronting the street providing major access, or (b) the side which the main entrance of the structure faces. In situations where neither of these methods clearly distinguishes the front, the Zoning Administrator shall make a determination. (2) For commercial or industrial uses, the front shall not be a primarily residential street. (3) On corner lots where a building or buildings face more than one street, sign area shall be allowed for front lineal footage as indicated in the district regulations, and for one half the side street frontage, provided: (a) The side street does not front on a primarily residential area; (b) Sign area as determined by each frontage is placed only on the frontage from which it is determined. J. TEMPORARY SIGNS (1) Any person wishing to display a temporary sign must apply for a sign permit pursuant to Section 21-93 (F). Except as provided in Sections (2) and (3) below, pertaining to real estate and construction signs, temporary signs shall comply with the following standards: (a) Each business or use on a lot shall be allowed to display a temporary sign a maximum of four (4) times per calendar 15 ~` ~~- year. No business may display a temporary sign or signs for more than thirty (30) consecutive days, nor more than a total of one hundred twenty (120) days per calendar year. Businesses that wish to display temporary signage in excess of these provisions may apply for a permanent sign permit which shall be evaluated against the applicable district standards. (b) Only one portable sign may be displayed on a lot or at a shopping center, at any one time. Any portable sign displayed shall have a minimum sign setback of 40 feet from the centerline of any public right-of-way, or 15 feet from any front property line, whichever is greater. (c) No business or establishment shall display more than two temporary signs simultaneously and the total square footage of any temporary signs displayed at one time shall not exceed sixty (60) square feet. (2) Real estate signs greater than sixteen (16) square feet in commercial or industrial zoning districts or greater than five (5) square feet in agricultural or residential zoning districts may be installed on a lot provided that each such sign does not exceed ninety-six (96) square feet in area, and has a minimum sign setback of fifteen (15) feet from any public right-of-way. All real estate signs must be removed within 14 days after the property has been sold or leased. (3) On premises construction signs may be installed on active construction sites. No construction sign shall exceed ninety-six (96) square feet in area. Any such sign must have a minimum sign setback of fifteen (15) feet from any public right-of-way. All construction signs must be removed from a construction site prior 16 to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the building or project . R. ILLUMINATED SIGNS (1) Signs may be illuminated either through the use of backlighting or direct lighting provided the following standards are met: (a) Information on any illumination proposed as part of a sign must be provided by the applicant on the sign permit application. (b) (Reserved) (c) No light from any illuminated sign shall cause direct glare into or upon any building other than the building to which the sign is related. (d) No light from any illuminated sign shall cause direct glare on to any adjoining piece of property, or any adjoining right-of-way. (2) Any sign containing electrical components shall conform to current UL, ETL, CSA, or ULC standards and display a label from one of these recognized testing labs; or as an alternative, shall be designed and constructed to standards that would allow one of the above referenced labels to be affixed and thereafter inspected by Roanoke County to insure compliance with these standards. L. PROJECTING AND SUSPENDED SIGNS (1) No projecting or suspended sign shall extend more than six (6) feet from any wall or other structure to which it is affixed, nor shall any such sign have a setback of less than fifteen (15) feet from the nearest public right-of-way. (2) The bottom edge of any projecting or suspended sign must 17 be at least seven (7) feet above the ground if located above any publicly accessible walkway or driveway. (3) No projecting or suspended sign shall project or suspend over an adjoining lot, without the expressed written consent of the adjoining property owner. M. NONCONFORMING SIGNS (1) Nonconforming Signs-Generally. Any sign which was lawfully in existence at the time of the effective date of this ordinance which does not conform to the provisions herein, and any sign which is accessory to a nonconforming use, shall be deemed a nonconforming sign and may remain except as qualified in section (2), below. No nonconforming sign shall be enlarged, extended, structurally reconstructed, or altered in any manner; except a sign face may be changed so long as the new face is equal to, or reduced in height, sign area, and/or projection. (a) The addition of lighting or illumination to a nonconforming sign, shall constitute an expansion of a nonconforming structure, and shall not be permitted under these regulations. (2) Removal of Nonconforming Signs. Nonconforming signs may remain, provided they are kept in good repair, except for the following: (a) Damacte or destruction of a non-conforming sign. A nonconforming sign which is destroyed or damaged to the extent exceeding fifty (50) percent of its replacement value shall not be altered, replaced or reinstalled unless it is in conformance with these sign regulations. If the damage or destruction is fifty (50) percent or less of its replacement value, the sign may be restored 18 ~~~ within ninety (90) days of the damage or destruction, but shall not be enlarged in any manner. (b) Damage or destruction of use. A nonconforming on- premises sign shall be removed if the structure or use to which it is accessory is destroyed or demolished to the extent exceeding fifty (50) percent of the principal structures value. (c) Chanc,~e of Zoning. Whenever a change of zoning occurs by petition of the owner, contract purchaser with the owner's consent, or the owner's agent upon a lot which contains a nonconforming on-premises sign, such sign shall not be permitted without being modified in such a manner as to be in full compliance with these sign regulations. (d) Off-Premises Signs Off-premises signs located in agricultural or residential zoning districts are, due to their location, inconsistent with the purposes of this ordinance. All off-premises signs located in agricultural or residential zoning districts shall be removed by January 1, 2000. After this date, the Zoning Administrator may order the removal of any such sign, provided Roanoke County compensates the owner for the fair market value of the sign structure. Nothing in this section shall prohibit the Chief Building Official from ordering the removal, without compensation, of damaged or neglected signs in accordance with 21-93 N. N. DAMAGED OR NEGLECTED 8IGN8 (1) The Chief Building Official of Roanoke County shall have the authority to order the removal, without compensation, of any sign or sign structure that due to neglect or damage poses a clear danger to the health, safety and welfare of the public. 19 7 `~G~' .."' ~" O. DISTRICT REGIILATIONS (1) A-1 ZONING DISTRICT (a) Lots within an A-1 district shall be allowed a maximum signage allocation not to exceed one-quarter (.25) square foot of sign area per 1 lineal foot of lot frontage. The following signs shall be allowed in the A-1 District subject to the regulations contained herein: BUSINESS SIGNS Each permitted business in an A-1 district shall be allowed a maximum of fifty (50) square feet of sign area, provided that the total signage on the lot does not exceed the allowable maximum as defined in (a) above. Businesses that request sign permits for lots that meet or exceed their allowable sign allocation shall be allowed a maximum of twenty-five (25) square feet of signage. IDENTIFICATION SIGNS A maximum of thirty (30) square feet shall be allowed per use. HOME OCCUPATION SIGNS A maximum of two (2) square feet shall be allowed per home occupation, or group of home occupations within one home. HISTORIC SITE SIGNS A maximum of fifteen (15) square feet shall be allowed per sign. TEMPORARY SIGNS Temporary signs shall be allowed in accordance with Section 21-93 (J). (b) No freestanding sign shall be allowed on any lot having less than two hundred (200) feet of lot frontage. The required minimum separation for freestanding signs on a lot or lots under single ownership or control shall be 250 feet. No freestanding sign shall be located within fifteen (15) feet of any 20 ~` ~ ~ - .~- other freestanding sign on an adjacent or adjoining lot. (c) Any freestanding sign erected must have a minimum sign setback of 40 feet from the centerline of any public right- of-way, or 15 feet from any front property line, whichever is greater. (d) No freestanding sign shall exceed fifteen (15) feet in height. (e) No establishment shall be allowed more than two (2) signs. (2) RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT REGULATIONS (a) Lots within R-E, R-1, R-2, R-3, R-4, R-MH, R-5, and R-6 districts shall be allowed a maximum signage allocation not to exceed one-quarter (.25) square foot of sign area per 1 lineal foot of lot frontage. The following signs shall be allowed in the R-E, R-1, R-2, R- 3, R-4, R-MH, R-5, and R-6 Districts subject to the regulations contained herein: BUSINESS SIGNS Each permitted business in a residential district shall be allowed a maximum of thirty (30) square feet of sign area, provided that the total signage on the lot does not exceed the allowable maximum as defined in (a) above. Businesses that request sign permits for lots that meet or exceed their allowable sign allocation shall be allowed a maximum of twenty- five (25) square feet of signage. IDENTIFICATION SIGNS A maximum of thirty (30) square feet shall be allowed per use. HOME OCCUPATION SIGNS A maximum of two (2) square feet shall be allowed per home occupation, or group of home occupations within 21 one home. HISTORIC SITE SIGNS A maximum of fifteen (15) square feet shall be allowed per sign. TEMPORARY SIGNS Temporary signs shall be allowed in accordance with Section 21-93 (J). (b) No freestanding sign shall be allowed on any lot having less than two hundred (200) feet of lot frontage. The required minimum separation for freestanding signs on a lot or lots under single ownership or control shall be 250 feet. No freestanding sign shall be located within fifteen (15) feet of any other freestanding sign on an adjacent or adjoining lot. (c) Any freestanding sign erected must have a minimum sign setback of 40 feet from the centerline of any public right- of-way, or 15 feet from any front property line, whichever is greater. (d) No freestanding sign shall exceed ten (10) feet in height. (e) No establishment shall be allowed more than two (2) signs. (3) B-1 OFFICE DISTRICT REGULATIONS (a) Lots within a B-1 district shall be allowed a maximum signage allocation not to exceed one-half (.5) square foot of sign area per 1 lineal foot of lot frontage. The following signs shall be allowed in the B-1 Office District subject to the regulations contained herein: BOSINESS SIGNS Each permitted business in a B-1 district shall be allowed a maximum of five hundred (500) square feet of sign area, provided that the total signage on the lot does not 22 ~ 90 ;~ exceed the allowable maximum as defined in (a) above. Businesses that request sign permits for lots that meet or exceed their allowable sign allocation shall be allowed a maximum of twenty- five (25) square feet of signage. IDENTIFICATION SIGNS Identification signs shall be subject to the same regulations as business signs within this zone. HISTORIC SITE SIGNS A maximum of fifteen (15) square feet shall be allowed per sign. TEMPORARY SIGNS Temporary signs shall be allowed in accordance with Section 21-93 (J). (b) No on-premises freestanding sign shall be allowed on any lot having less than one hundred (100) feet of lot frontage. The required minimum separation for freestanding signs on a lot or lots under single ownership or control shall be 250 feet. No freestanding sign shall be located within fifteen (15) feet of any other freestanding sign on an adjacent or adjoining lot. (c) Any freestanding sign erected must have a minimum sign setback of 40 feet from the centerline of any public right- of-way, or 15 feet from any front property line, whichever is greater. (d) No freestanding sign shall exceed fifteen (15) feet in height. (e) No establishment shall be allowed more than two (2) signs. (4) B-2 GENERAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT REGULATIONS (a) Lots within a B-2 district shall be allowed a maximum signage allocation not to exceed one and one-half (1.50) square feet of sign area per 1 lineal foot of lot frontage. 23 `~ ~`~ ~ . The following signs shall be allowed in the B-2 General Commercial District subject to the regulations contained herein: BUSINESS SIGNS Each permitted business in a B-2 district shall be allowed a maximum of five hundred (500) square feet of sign area, provided that the total signage on the lot does not exceed the allowable maximum as defined in (a) above. Businesses that request sign permits for lots that meet or exceed their allowable sign allocation shall be allowed a maximum of twenty- five (25) square feet of signage. IDENTIFICATION SIGNS Identification signs shall be subject to the same regulations as business signs within this zone. HISTORIC SITE SIGNS A maximum of fifteen (15) square feet shall be allowed per sign. TEMPORARY SIGNS Temporary signs shall be allowed in accordance with Section 21-93 (J). (b) No on-premises freestanding sign shall be allowed on any lot having less than one hundred (100) feet of lot frontage. The required minimum separation for freestanding signs on a lot or lots under single ownership or control shall be 250 feet. No freestanding sign shall be located within fifteen (15) feet of any other freestanding sign on an adjacent or adjoining lot. (c) Any freestanding sign erected must have a minimum sign setback of 40 feet from the centerline of any public right- of-way, or 15 feet from any front property line, whichever is greater. (d) No freestanding sign shall exceed twenty-five (25) feet in height. (e) No establishment shall be allowed more than three 24 ~/9D - 5 (3) signs. (5) B-3 SPECIAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT REGULATIONS (a) Lots within a B-3 district shall be allowed a maximum signage allocation not to exceed two (2.0) square feet of sign area per 1 lineal foot of lot frontage. The following signs shall be allowed in the B-3 Special Commercial District subject to the regulations contained herein: BUSINESS SIGNS Each business in a B-3 district shall be allowed a maximum of five hundred (500) square feet of sign area, provided that the total signage on the lot does not exceed the allowable maximum as defined in (a) above. Businesses that request sign permits for lots that meet or exceed their allowable sign allocation shall be allowed a maximum of twenty-five (25) square feet of signage. IDENTIFICATION SIGNS Identification signs shall be subject to the same regulations as business signs within this zone. HISTORIC BITE SIGNS A maximum of fifteen (15) square feet shall be allowed per sign. TEMPORARY SIGNS Temporary signs shall be allowed in accordance with Section 21-93 (J). (b) No on-premises freestanding sign shall be allowed on any lot having less than one hundred (100) feet of lot frontage. The required minimum separation for freestanding signs on a lot or lots under single ownership or control shall be 250 feet. No freestanding sign shall be located within fifteen (15) feet of any other freestanding sign on an adjacent or adjoining lot. (c) Any freestanding sign erected must have a minimum sign setback of 40 feet from the centerline of any public right- 25 ~9U-5 of-way, or 15 feet from any front property line, whichever is greater. (d) No freestanding sign shall exceed twenty-five (25) feet in height. (e) No establishment shall be allowed more than three (3) signs. (6) INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICT REGULATIONS (a) Lots within M-l, M-2, and M-3 districts shall be allowed a maximum signage allocation not to exceed one and one- half (1.5) square feet of sign area per 1 lineal foot of lot frontage. The following signs shall be allowed in the M-1, M-2, and M- 3 districts subject to the regulations contained herein: BUSINESS SIGNS Each business in an industrial zoning district shall be allowed a maximum of three hundred (300) square feet of sign area, provided that the total signage on the lot does not exceed the allowable maximum as defined in (a) above. Businesses that request sign permits for lots that meet or exceed their allowable sign allocation shall be allowed a maximum of twenty- five (25) square feet of signage. HISTORIC SITE SIGNS A maximum of fifteen (15) square feet shall be allowed per sign. IDENTIFICATION SIGNS Identification signs shall be subject to the same regulations as business signs within this zone. TEMPORARY SIGNS Temporary signs shall be allowed in accordance with Section 21-93 (J) (b) No on-premises freestanding sign shall be allowed on any lot having less than one hundred (100) feet of lot frontage. 26 ~~~~ The required minimum separation for freestanding signs on a lot or lots under single ownership or control shall be 250 feet. No freestanding sign shall be located within fifteen (15) feet of any other freestanding sign on an adjacent or adjoining lot. (c) Any freestanding sign erected must have a minimum sign setback of 40 feet from the centerline of any public right- of-way, or 15 feet from any front property line, whichever is greater. (d) No freestanding sign shall exceed twenty-five (25) feet in height. (e) No establishment shall be allowed more than three (3) signs. P. SPECIAL SIGNAGE DISTRICTS AND REGULATIONS (1) OFF-PREMISES SIGNS Off-premises signs shall be allowed in the B-2, B-3, M-l, M-2 and M-3 Districts provided the following location and design standards are met: (a) No off-premises sign shall be located within a five hundred (500) foot radius of an existing off-premises sign, or an off-premises sign for which a valid permit has been obtained, but has not yet been erected. (b) No off-premises sign shall be located within two hundred (200) feet of any residential zoning district, public square, park, school, library, or church. (c) No off-premises sign shall be allowed to be installed on any roof structure, nor shall any such sign exceed 35 feet in height above the abutting road. (d) Side by side, double and multi-decker off-premises signs shall not be permitted. 27 7 "` .,.. (e) Any off-premises sign must have a minimum sign setback of 40 feet from the centerline of any public right-of-way, or 15 feet from any front property line, whichever is greater. Any off-premises sign shall have a minimum side and/or rear yard setback of fifteen (15) feet. (f) The maximum size of any off-premises sign on a lot shall be 378 square feet plus 10~ for embellishments. (2) USE NOT PROVIDED FOR PERMITS In conjunction with the approval of any Use Not Provided For Permit, the Board of Supervisors, after consideration of the advice and recommendation of the Planning Commission, shall impose sign limitations for the use as may be deemed appropriate. Prior to acting, the Planning Commission and the Board shall consider the nature of the use, its public display and advertising needs, and the impact of any signage scheme on the character of the surrounding area. (3) PLANNED DEVELOPMENTS A signage plan shall be submitted as part of any proposal for a Planned Unit Development (PUD) or a Planned Commercial Development (PCD) as authorized elsewhere in this ordinance. The signage plan shall be part of the required preliminary development plan. All signage plans shall be of sufficient detail to allow the Commission and Board of Supervisors to judge the compatibility of the proposed signage with the character of the proposed PUD or PCD. At a minimum, all signage plans shall provide information on the general size, location, style, color, and materials of all signs proposed. In evaluating the PUD or PCD proposal, the Commission and Board shall consider the appropriateness of the proposed signage plan in relation to the character of the proposed development, and the surrounding area. 28 (4) AIRPORT IMPACT ZONES The allowable height of signs within any established Airport Impact Zone shall be governed by the height restriction for that zone, or the height restriction imposed by the applicable district regulation, whichever is more restrictive. (5) SITE DEVELOPMENT PLANS Site development plans for new commercial and industrial development projects shall show the general location of any freestanding sign proposed. Site plans shall be designed so that freestanding signs may be placed on a lot in a location that conforms to these provisions. (6) LOTS WITHOUT PUBLIC STREET FRONTAGE Lots without public street frontage that existed upon the effective date of this ordinance shall be allowed signage based upon the applicable district regulations as provided for in Section 21-93 (O) of this ordinance. Permitted signage shall be calculated based upon the frontage width of the lot that parallels the nearest public street. Q. VARIANCES (1) Requests for variances to these sign regulations shall follow the procedures outlined in Section 21-123 (B) of the Zoning Ordinance. The Board of Zoning Appeals, in considering any variance request, shall follow the guidelines of this section, and Section 15.1-495 of the Code of Virginia, (1950), as amended. The power to grant variances does not extend to an economic hardship related to the cost, size or location of a new sign, or to the convenience of an applicant, nor should it be extended to the convenience of regional or national businesses which propose to use a standard sign when it does not conform to the provisions of this section. R. GRAPHICS (1) The graphics incorporated herein are provided as 29 ~~~° illustrative examples of various sign types and sign related terminology used in this ordinance. As such they are not intended to be inclusive of all sign designs. 3. Severability The sections, paragraphs, sentences, and clauses of this ordinance are severable, and if any phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph, or section of this ordinance shall be declared unconstitutional, or invalid by the valid judgement or decree of a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs, and sections of this ordinance shall remain valid. 4. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect on and after the date of its adoption, April 24, 1990. 30 Fii Ilr~, ggQ FREE STANDING SIGNS MetfoPLex MONUMENT SIGN AWNING SIGN 9A1 A V E /'/6 5 G 9.95 TEMPORARY PORTABLE SIGNS D fT~TI D ATTACHED SIGN 0 ATTACHED SIGN ATTACHED SIGN ~M io D ~~~~ PROJECTING SIGN SUSPENDED SIGN TEIKPORARY BANNER ~~` i / .~ ~~ ~~~ ~. ~' i ~~ ~\ .~ LOT FRONTAGE & SIGN SETBACK SIGi1 A.:EA (FREESTANDING) ill I '" SIGN AREA (INDI`JIDUAL LETTERS) SIGN HEIGHT ~-- y~'r~A~K SOW ~~~ SIGN AREA (`IONU?'~IENT) 111111 lllillliil l 1111 ll l 1111 111 l l 1111 111 llillllllll l 1111111 l 111111 llllllllll lilll l 1111 1111 l 1111111 1111 llllul j~lllllllllllllllllllill ,;;~,a ;',~,~ .,, qA~~ _- _ _ _ _ _ E ARAN CE REQUEST _ APP _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ AGENDA ITEM NO. 90- _ _ _ ~ _ _ _ _ _ _ SUBJECT ~l~ ~ ~~ i _ _ _ = I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to _ reco nize me during the public hearing on the above matter WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, _ so that I ma comment. _ _ _ _ I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR T _ _ _ _ RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINE _ - _ - c LISTED BELOW. - • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment _ whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairnnan will = decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, -_ will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to and = do otherwise. _ • S Bakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Ques- '- lions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. __ _ • A11 comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. _ _ • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. __ • Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments _ _ with the clerk. __ • INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION _ FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT c _ _ THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO DEPUTY CLERK - - _ -_ _ ' - - ~ ~ o ~- - _ NAME ~ ~ - _ _ - ADDRESS ~ ~/ a / ~ ~ _ _ _ ^ PHONE 3 ~3 -~aD o _ illlllllllillllllllll lllllllillll ll l l l llllllll llllllillllilllliillllliiilllliiiillllilillllllllllllliltlllliiililllll mlllllli ~ I I I I I I I I I I111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111I I I I.IIIIUIIIIU~iII 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I,(j~ - _ _ d _ _ +~ _ _ _ - - _ _ _ _ APPEARANCE REQUEST _ _ - - _ - _ - AGENDA ITEM NO. ~ .~' ~ ~ ~-° _ __ SUB ECT ~~ ~ ~ ®2~ ~NA~c~ _ J I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so that I may comment.WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW. • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. - _ - __ • Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Ques- bons of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. • All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. c • Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. c c • INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION -_ FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. -_ _ i PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO DEPUTY CLERK mlillllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllilllllililllllllllllllllllillllllilllllillllllllllllllllilllllllllllllllllllilllllllllm _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ _ APPEARANCE RE VEST _ Q _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ - _ ~ - AGENDA ITEM NO. ' ~ ~ ~ ~ SUBJECT S ~~~ ~~-~,~~~N ~~. uld like the Chairman of the Board of Su ervisors to I wo p recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so that I may comment.WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES c LISTED BELOW. • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Boazd to = do otherwise. _ - • Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Ques- __ bons of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. • All comments must be directed to the Boazd. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. • Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments __ with the clerk. -_ • INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT c THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO DEPUTY CLERK m~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~m iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiuiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii~ ll~ - _ ~~ ~ _ ~ - _ - _ - _ - _ - _ - APPEARANCE REQUEST _ _ - - - _ _ - = AGENDA ITEM NO. - _ ~ - - -~ ~~ . ~~t~`-~ ~ - -_ SUBJECT ~~ ~~ ~,~~ r : ~ ft~'< - _ _ - I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to = recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter __ - so that I may comment.WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, s - - I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE _ - RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES _ _ - LISTED BELOW. __ • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment __ whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will '" decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, = and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to - - - - - do otherwise. - _ • Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Ques- tions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. - • All comments must be directed to the Boazd. Debate between a recognized = speaker and audience members is not allowed. __ - • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. • Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. c =_ • INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED - - GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION = FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT - -_ - - -_ THEM. - = - PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO DEPUTY CLERK - _ _ - - p~ - - - NAME ~~„~ ~~ fhw' - - - ,_ - - - - - - ADDRESS ~' ~ ,~,~ ~ ~. ~.~ ;` ~°'~ ~; ~`"~ ~~ ~-' _: - - -_ PHONE ~` ~--~ ~ ~'' °'~ - ~ _ m~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~,~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ I II Illlllllllllllllllilllllllllllllllillllllllllllllllllllllllitlllllllillllllllllllllll~l,Wl~Wll~l~illl,IIIII`IIIIIIIII~J,I a~ - .,. - b - ..~- .' ~ ` - .+ PEARANCE REQUEST ''~~~~~-~~~ AP _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ = G- S' _ _ - - AGENDA ITEM NO. - _ - _ - -_ SUBJECT '~``~~~ - - I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to - reco nine me during the public hearing on the above matter - WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, _ so that I ma comment. _ - I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FORT _ c - RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES _ - = LISTED BELOW. _ c • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment - whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will = decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, =_ will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to '- and - __ do otherwise. - • S Bakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Ques- __ lions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. - - • All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized __ -_ _ speaker and audience members is not allowed. - - eakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. =_ _ • Both sp __ c • Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments - - with the clerk. -_ __ • INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED = GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION "~ FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT = THEM. ~' _ PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO DEPUTY CLERK - _ _ - "~' NAME L ~ ~ ~ ~ 2 ~ L - - - _ s /' ADDRESS 3 U w l~~ U~ 5 0~-~...-- - - ... - - = PHONE ~ ~ ~~ - = _ ~IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIilllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll~ _ _ - APPEARANCE RE UEST ~ t _ Q - _ - _ - _ _ AGENDA ITEM NO. ~~°~ ~~ _ - - - - SUBJECT ~ 9'r~-~ > ~ _ - _ -_ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so that I may comment.WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW. _ • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment =_ whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. __ • Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Ques- bons of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. • All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized c speaker and audience members is not allowed. __ _ • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. __ c • Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments ~_ with the clerk. • INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED c c GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. ~. - ® a PT.EASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO DEPUTY CLERK mlillilllllllllllllllllllllllllllilllllllllll Iillllllllllllllllllllllilllllllllllllllillilllillllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllm w ~, ~.~~:~~ PETITIONER: AEROSPACE RESEARCH CORP. CASE NUMBER: 15-4/90 Planning Commission Hearing Date: April 3, 1990 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: April 24, 1990 A. REQUEST Petition of Aerospace Risionchlocatedaoff Routee939 e(Aerospace Road),n Vinton R-1 to develop a subdi , Magisterial District. B. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION There was no opposition to the request. C. SIGNIFICANT IMPACT FACTORS None. D. PROFFERED CONDITIONS 1. All lots in the proposed subdivision shall contain a minimum land area of one acre. Half of the lots are well over one acre. 2. A minimum 50 foot buffer yard will be maintained between the M-2 and R-1 properties. E. COMMISSIONER'S MOTION, VOTE AND REASON Mr. Robinson moved to approve the request with proffered conditions. Mr. Winstead requested an amendment to the motion which would eliminate the two unenforceable proffers. The amended motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES:Massey, Winstead, Witt, Robinson, Gordon NAYS:None ABSENT: None F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE None. G. ATTACHMENTS: Concept Plan Vicinity Map Staff Report Other ~_~ Terrance Harington, cretary Roanoke County Planning Commission ~~ ~~~ STAFF REPORT CASE NUMBER: 15-4/90 PETITIONER: Aerospace Research Corp. REVIEWED BY: Jon Hartley DATE: March 30, 1990 Petition of Aerospace Research Corporation to rezone a 51.62 acre parcel from M-2 to R-1 to develop a residential subdivision, located off of Route 939 (Aerospace Road), Vinton Magisterial District. 1, NATURE OF REQUEST the Board of Supervisors a, Petitioner has modifi1990 to deve op a dportion of the Corporations request in January, land holdings for residential use. Where the original proposal contained 25 lots on 22.5 acres, this proposal contains 23 lots on 51.62 acres. Petitioner has proffered as a conditions that all lots shall contain a minimum of one acre. Petitioner has also proffered to preserve as many trees as possible, and to work with the local fire department in forest fire prevention measures. Aerospace Research Corporation is a research and development firm involved in alternative fuels research for gas turbines, a wide variety of environmental testing, and rocket fuel research. Petitioner has indicated that present activities are small in scale and involve only very small quantities of explosive or hazardous materials. The present M-2 zoning adjoining the 52 acre parcel would permit a wide variety of uses which may or may not be compatible with the proposed residential uses. b, Attached concept plan and zoning vicinity map describe project more fully. 2, APPLICABLE REGULATIONS ublic a,, The R-1 district allows only single family residences, p facilities, community and country clubs, and churches. The minimum lot size required is 15,000 square feet (0.34 acres), unless larger lots are required for sewage disposal by the Health Department. b, The M-2, Manufacturing district, permits a wide variety of light and heavy industrial uses including, automobile assembly, contractor"s yard, truck terminals, brick manufacturing, etc. c. Subdivision plans must be submitted for review and approval by the County, including approval of well and septic drain field locations, prior to the sale of any lots. As proposed, the street must met the same standards required in the Urban Service area due to the density. 3, SITE CHARACTERISTICS Aerospace a,, Topography: The majority of the 148 acre parcel owned by Research consists of a series of ridges and moderate to steep valleys, with moderately level plateau areas scattered throughout the property. This topography makes this site generally unsuitable for intensive industrial development without exten of osed afor movement and grading. The terrain of the property p p rezoning consists of a ridge, with moderate to steep slopes leading downward to minor drainage ways and Back Creek on either side of the ridge. ~' .~. b, Ground Cover: Vegetative oolar andsmapleof The~statera~ea forester stands of Virginia pine, p p recommends that most of the trees on this site should be retained during and after development, other than those near buildings which may be hazardous, to prevent erosion problems and protect water quality. 4. AREA CHARACTERISTICS a. Future Growth Priority: Situated within the Mount Pleasant Community Planning Area. The growth initiative for this area is to limit growth. b. General area consists ofi scattered residential development, open space, and woodlands. g, LAND USE IMPACT ASSESSMENT Rating: Rate each factor according to the impact of the proposed action. Use a scale of 1 through 5. 1 = positive impact, 2 = negligible impact, 3 = manageable impact, 4 = disruptive impact, 5 = severe impact, and N/A = not applicable. RATING FACTOR COMMENTS LAND USE COMPATIBILITY 3 a. Comprehensive Plan: 1985 Comprehensive Development Plan has placed this area within a Rural Preserve land use category. The proposed use for residential purposes is consistent, but the density of development proposed is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan policies and map. The density recommended in the plan is less than one unit per five acres. The petitioner's concept plan depicts a density of one residence for every 2.2 acres, while the petitioner has only proffered a density of not less than one residence per acre. A request to amend the Comprehensive Plan Map was submitted with the previous petition. This request was denied by the Board of Supervisors, consistent with the recommendation of the Planning Commission. 2 b. Surrounding Land: Immediately adjacent to the site is woodlands and open space, and the facilities of Aerospace Research Corp, and a residential subdivision on a ridge above and overlooking the subject property. 2 c, Neighboring Area: Within the neighboring area are a few scattered residences, and a contractor's storage facility. The balance of the area is wooded open space. 2 d. Site Layout: The road shown on concept plan submitted fiollows a ridge. The lots on either side would have moderate to steep slopes and will require careful site planning for each residence to accommodate all necessary improvements. 2 e. Architecture: No architectural style has been indicated. ~ ~v N/A Screening and buffering f. Screening and Landscaping: requirements are imposed on the more intensive use at the time of development or expansion. Therefore screening and buffering would occur on the adjoining M-2 property only if the adjoining industrial facility is enlarged. N/A g. Amenities: 2 h, Natural Amenities: (See Ground Cover above.) TRAFFIC 2 i, Street Capacities: The 23 residences currently proposed wou generate approximately 230 ADT. In 1986 Aerospace Road (Route 939 ) had an ADT of 89, while Route 116 had an ADT of 3, 370. Four accidenotf Routes 116 ande9391during 1987 inity of the intersectio 2 j, Circulation: Access to the 23 lots proposed would be provided by a new street. Subdivision regulations require that the road be built to county and state standards and dedicated to the state. Sight distance, grades and other design aspects of this road will be reviewed during the subdivision review process against those standards. However, sight distance appears to be adequate. UTILITIES 2 k, Water: Public water is unavailable. Private well locations must be approved by the Health Department. 2 1. Sewer: Public sewer is una~OVe~bby~therHealthsDepartmentems and drain fields must be app DRAINAGE 2 m. Basin: Located on a minor tributary of Back Creek. n. Floodplain: Portions of the property proposed for rezoning 2 and development is located in the federally designate floodplain along Hack Creek. The specific 100 year flood plain elevation would have to be delineated on any subdivision plat, with development prohibited in those areas. PUBLIC SERVICES 3 0. Fire Protection: Within established service limits. This area is served by the Mt. Pleasant Fire and Rescue Station. Petitioner has agreed, as a proffered condition, to work with the local fire department in forest fire prevention measures. 2 p, Rescue: Within established service limits. This area is served by the Mt. Pleasant Fire and Rescue Station. 2 q, Parks and Recreation: No park or recreation facilities are proposed in association with this petition. 2 r. Schools: The 23 lots proposed in this rezoning petition would generate approximately 15 school aged children. Adequate capacity is available in the Mt. Pleasant/William Byrd Jr & Sr High system to accommodate these students. ~~~ TAX BASE 3 s, - Land and Improvement Value: $ 22,100 (Present) - Taxable Gross Sales/Year: Not Applicable - Total Employees: Not Applicable - Total Revenue to the County/Year: Not Available ENVIRONMENT 2 t, Air: 2 u, Water: 2 v. Soils: 2 w. Noise: 2 x. Signage: 6, PLAN CONSISTENCY This area is designated as Rural Preserve. The petitioner's request is consistent with the uses encouraged in the Comprehensive Plan, but the density proposed is inconsistent with the plan policies. 7, STAFF EVALUATION a, Strengths: (1) The topography makes this site generally unsuitable for intensive industrial development without extensive earth movement and grading. (2) The proposed use is generally consistent with the Comprehensive Plan while the present zoning and use is inconsistent with the plan. b, Weaknesses: (1) The present M-2 zoning adjoining the 52 acre parcel would permit a wide variety of uses which may or may not be compatible with the proposed residential uses. (2) The density of development proposed is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan policies and map. (3) The lots proposed would have moderate to steep slopes and will require careful site planning for each residence to accommodate all necessary improvements. c, Proffers Suggested: None ~~~~~ AEROSPACE RESEARCH CORPORATION 5454 AEROSPACE RD. - ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24014 TELEPHONE 342-2859 AREA CODE 703 February 22, 1990 =irector of Planning, Roanoke County =,0, Box 29800 :,anoke, Virginia 24018-0798 :_ttention: Mr. Terry Harrington =ear Mr. Harrington: An application is hereby submitted for rezoning 51.62 acres of Aerospace esearch Corporation property now zoned M-2 to R-1 for the PThereeare noVelans aping a residential subdivision for single family housing. P 'cr providing water or sewer services to the area by the county. In addition .he contour of the terrain is such that it is poorly suited for industrial ~.se. Mr. Gubala has viewed the property and agoffertintthe usenof thetlando ~~mmercial use. We are making the following p 1, All purchasers of lots in the subdivision will be urged to preserve all trees that can safely be retained and they will be referred to the State Forester for advice. 2. The :~`.ount Pleasant Fire Department will be consulted regarding their advice and participation in preventio:~ of and responding to forest fires in the area. 3, All lots in the proposed subdivision shall contain a minimum land area of one acre. ~:c.lf of the lots are well over 1 acre. Any assistance your department can provide in effecting the rezoning of =his property will be appreciated. Very truly yours, ~~ R „fin I~UI Jv~ NTH/cd FER 22 199r~ PLA~iI~'Y1P~~E ~~ 6 ~~ AEROSPACE RESEARCH CORPORATION i ~, ~ Joseph T. Hamrick President \~ ~ ,t Z i.,'~ }'z n ~s S ~. ~~ -.,,~ _. __~ _ f ~: ~ _ > .f ~" 1 E f • :~ V U Ol 03 >¢- fI¢ \ ~o~ &~•z F- N . 2 I \ ~ .~Zr1 i n ;~ o Q c ~J ^7 ,~ _~ ~( 1~` _ O a ~J v JJ ~ J~ it z~o .Q,~ ~ ~u%ZyF! n m ~ a_,~ Q pY ¢n rv Y ~Z I jio2 aYhZ~FO~ ~ a rQ?~r-~vl ~JJ 2U ~ J ~ n =°u ~. r ~~ ~ n ~ " ~I \ ~ ~Qr,., 5 r1 'l i m ~~ k~o W L \ 1 ~oOp~ ~\I O11 ~~, N \ ~ I~ F- ° F ~ a° 1 o0 VN I Q E w 11 ~l ` ,% ~ ~ ~ ~ W ~Y l^ d uFV ~ p J4vf aQ~Q w ~ FOW W'^> N n Nod a m f p0 Qa^ J ~p4 pn~ Z V h ~~ w uo ? u ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~l ~~ W ~ ~• 4 Q1v~ of Z n~?, ~Yo a O~~~i •y~ ' SIN ~ ~ ~ Q J Z r } ~, o ,-~Nn_Q~~ ~J' r~= U -. f `w} ~ 2 Y~~ n~~ ~~~ 0 y~ y ; ~a~ ~UZ , ~ eTrv IY u W U Y a ~a AEROSPACE RESEARCH CORPORATION 5454 AEROSPACE RD. - ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24014 TELEPHONE 342-2859 AREA CODE 703 April 9, 1990 +!, ~~~ ~.~~ .~ ~,~ r ~3 ryI ,A P? ~ ~ 199Q Director of Planning, Roanoke County P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, Virginia 2+018-0798 Attention: Mr. Terry Harrington Dear Mr. Harrington: ~!~ t~Jf~TY ~ r -. As agreed upon at the Planning Commission meeting of April 3rd, 1990 the following proffers on the 51.62 acres of Aerospace Research Corporation land, which is to be developed as a 23 lot subdivision, are confirmed: 1. All lots in the subdivision will be one acre or greater in area. 2. A fifty foot wide buffer strip will be maintained between the back side of any lots and land zoned M-2. The existing trees on the land will remain to implement the buffering. If you have any comments on this please contact us. Very truly yours, AEROSPACE RESEARCH CORFORATION oseph T. Hamrick resident JTH/cd ~~~ "~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, APRIL 24, 1990 ORDINANCE TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A 51.62 ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED OFF ROUTE 939 (AEROSPACE ROAD) (TAX MAP NO. 90.00-3-12) IN THE VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF M-2 TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF R-1 WITH CONDITIONS UPON THE APPLICATION OF AEROSPACE RESEARCH CORPORATION WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on March 27, 1990, and the second reading and public hearing was held April 24, 1990; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on April 3, 1990; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing 51.62 acres, as described herein, and located off Route 939 (Aerospace Road), (Tax Map Number 90.00-3-12) in the Vinton Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of M-2, General Industrial District, to the zoning classification of R-1, Single Family Residential District. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of Aerospace Research Corporation. 3. That the owner has voluntarily proffered in writing the following conditions which the Board of Supervisors hereby accepts: a. All lots in the proposed subdivision shall contain a minimum land area of one acre. ~~ ~~ b. A minimum 50 foot buffer yard will be maintained between the M-2 and R-1 properties. The existing trees on the land will remain to implement the buffering. 4. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: Beginning at Point A in Back Creek at the western most point of the property, thence S. 56 deg. 30' E. 31 poles to point 44; thence S. 77 deg. E. 7.38 poles to a point on the Aerospace Road right-of-way; thence following Aerospace Road right-of-way 30.1 poles to point 43; thence N. 30 deg. E. 18.14 poles to point 42; thence N. 72 deg. 30' E. 40.92 poles to point 42A; thence N. 29 deg. 45' W. 96.9 poles to a point in the creek at 25 1/2; thence S. 89 deg. W. 42.39 poles to a point in the creek at 26; thence S. 20 deg. 15' W. 22.42 poles to a point in the creek at 27; thence S. 8 deg. 15' W. 52.54 poles to a point in the creek at 28; thence S. 7 deg. 11' W. to point A the beginning. Comprising a total of 51.62 acres, more or less. 5. That the effective date of this ordinance shall be April 24, 1990. `°~~ ~ r ~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, APRIL 24, 1990 ORDINANCE 42490-12 TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A 7.64 ACRES TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED NORTH OF PLANTATION ROAD (TAX MAP NOS. 27.06-5-2 and 27.06-5-9) IN THE HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A-1 TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF B-2 WITH CONDITIONS UPON THE APPLICATION OF DOMINION BANRSHARES WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on March 27, 1990, and the second reading and public hearing was held April 24, 1990; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on April 3, 1990; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing 7.64 acres, as described herein, and located north of Plantation Road, (Tax Map Numbers 27.06-5-2 and 27.06-5- 9) in the Hollins Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of A-1, Agricultural District, to the zoning classification of B-2, General Commercial District. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of Dominion Bankshares. 3. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: PARCEL 1 BEGINNING at a point on the easterly line of Virginia Route No. 115, Plantation Road, corner to Roger Page, Jr. lot (see Deed Book 858, page 20), being corner No. 5 on the plat made by C. B. Malcolm, S.C.E., dated September 11, 1943; thence with the said easterly line of said Virginia Route No. 115, Plantation Road, N. 19 deg. 20' W. 384.00 feet, more or less, to a point; thence still with the line of said Virginia Route No. 115, Plantation Road, N. 57 deg. 52' E. 10.0 feet to a point, corner to James A. Stephens' 30-foot wide parcel; thence with the southerly line of said James A. Stephens' 30- foot wide parcel, N. 57 deg. 52' E. 286.04 feet to a point; thence with the easterly line of said James A. Stephens' 30- wide parcel, N. 26 deg. 20' W. 30.0 feet to a point being the southeast corner of the Guy O. Plymale parcel (see Deed Book 553, page 525) and also being the southwest corner of the Alfred L. Hughes and wife lot (see Deed Book 505, page 458); thence with the southerly line of said Alfred L. Hughes and wife lot, N. 57 deg. 00' E. (N. 58 deg. 15' E.) 98.9 feet to a point, corner to Richard T. Dillon and wife parcel (see Deed Book 773, page 141) and also corner to O. H. Huffman land, and being corner No. 3 on the said C. B. Malcolm plat; thence with the line of said O. H. Huffman land, S. 23 deg. 52' E. 399 feet to a point on line of the First National Exchange Bank of Virginia (now Dominion Bank, National Association) tract, being corner No. 4 on said C. B. Malcolm plat; thence with the line of said First National Exchange Bank of Virginia (now Dominion Bank, National Association) and also Roger Page, Jr., lot S. 58 deg. 16' W. 427.0 feet to the place of BEGINNING less .333 acre parcel under separate contract with the Virginia Department of Transportation; and BEING the same property conveyed by Bertram H. Riley and Mary E. Riley by deed dated March 8, 1971, and of record in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, in Deed Book 913, page 503 LESS the .333 parcel under separate contract with the Virginia Department of Transportation. PARCEL 2 BEGINNING at an iron pin on the southerly line of Virginia Secondary Route No. 1895, corner to Tract 4 of the division of the lands of O. H. and Lila Huffman conveyed unto Raymond B. and Hazel H. Huffman in Deed Book 1004, page 686; thence with the line of said Tract 4, S. 29 deg. 51' 08" E. 525.81 feet to an iron pin, corner to the First National Exchange Bank (now Dominion Bank, National Association) parcel; thence with the same, S. 57 deg. 31' 40" W. 380.71 feet to an iron pin, corner to the lands formerly owned by G. H. and Mary E. Riley; thence with the same N. 21 deg. 37' 37" W. 318.91 feet to an iron pin, corner to the parcel of land formerly belonging to A. B. McDaniel and wife (Deed Book 463, page 277); thence with the same, N. 62 deg. 11' 18" E. 60.83 feet to an iron pin, corner also to said parcel formerly belonging to said A. B. McDaniel and wife; thence further with the same, N. 21 deg. 37' 37" W. 228.97 feet to an iron pin in the south line of said Virginia Secondary Route No. 1895; thence with the same the following three courses and distances: N. 61 deg. 26' 07" E. 147.04 feet to a Virginia Department of Highway Monument; thence N. 28 deg. 33' S2" W. 10.00 feet to a iron pin; and thence N. 62 deg. 18' 59" E. 93.98 feet to the place of BEGINNING, and containing 3.84404 acres, being Tract 2 as shown on a map prepared by Raymond B. Huffman showing the survey of a division of the lands of O.H. and Lila Huffman, situate in the Catawba Magisterial District of Roanoke County, Virginia, dated July 26, 1974, and made by Raymond E. Robertson, Engineer and Surveyor, a copy of which is of record in Deed Book 1004, page 689, reference to which map is hereby specifically made; and BEING the same property conveyed by Lila E. Huffman by deed dated June 10, 1975, of record in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court for the County of Roanoke, Virginia, in Deed Book 1019, page 660. 4. That the Church of God, as owner of the real estate, has voluntarily proffered in writing the following conditions which the Board of Supervisors hereby accepts: a. The property will not included permitted uses for undertaking establishments and funeral homes; public billiard parlors, poolrooms, bowling alleys, golf driving ranges and similar forms of public amusement; animal hospitals or clinics and commercial kennels; flea markets; home for adults; clinics, hospitals and nursing homes; and public dance halls. 5. That the effective date of this ordinance shall April 24, 1990. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt ordinance amended that the proffered condition #2 regarding signage be deleted as contained in paragraph 4.b., and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: Supervisor Eddy ABSTAIN: Supervisor McGraw A COPY TESTE: y~/: Q~I~L~-- Mary H. llen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Development & Inspections Terry Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning John Willey, Director, Real Estate Assessment Paul Mahoney, County Attorney - i+'~ ~ !& PETITIONER: DOMINION BANRSIiARES CASE NUMBER: 16-4/90 Planning Commission Hearing Date: April 3, 1990 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: April 24, 1990 A. REQUEST Petition of Dominion Bankshares to rezone an approximate 7.64 acre parcel from A-1 to B-2 for general office use, located north of Plantation Road, Hollins Magisterial District. B. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION Mrs. A. L. Hughes expressed concern that the drainage ditch cannot handle the present runoff and more blacktopping will add to the problem. She requested that the trees remain on the property. Carol Slate said that the bank employees use Friendship Lane as a back way into the bank's parking area which causes difficulty in getting out of her driveway. She said more flooding will occur. C. SIGNIFICANT IMPACT FACTORS 1. Site Layout: The required concept plan has not been submitted. 2. Amenities: The required concept plan has not been submitted. Amenities cannot be evaluated. 3. Circulation: It is impossible to evaluate circulation since the required concept plan has not been submitted. 4. Noise: Most of the B-2 uses would not have a significant impact on noise quality. Commercial kennels are allowed in this district provided they are fully enclosed and without exterior runs. Even with these restrictions, noise levels at surrounding residences could be a problem. D. RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS 1. The property will not include permitted uses for undertaking establishments and funeral homes; public billiard parlors, poolrooms, bowling alleys, golf driving ranges and similar forms of public amusement; animal hospitals or clinics and commercial kennels; flea markets; home for adults; clinics, hospitals and nursing homes; and public dance halls. 2 . Signage to be limited to 1.25 sq. ft. for each lineal foot of public street frontage. E. COMMISSIONER'S MOTION, VOTE AND REASON Mr. Winstead moved to approve the request and noted Commission's concern that petitioner has not proffered conditions recommended by staff. The motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Winstead, Witt, Robinson, Gordon NAYS: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: Massey Mr. Massey said that he would be abstaining from discussion and vote on the petition due to a potential conflict of interest. F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE None. G. ATTACHMENTS: Concept Plan Vicinity Map Staff Report Other l .ter. ~..,. c'< ._. --- -- Terrance Harington Secretary Roanoke County Pl nning Commission ~ ~- STAFF REPORT CASE NUMBER: 16-4/90 RE N EWED Bv: Janet Scheid 1. NATUFE OF REQUEST 2. PETITIGfJER: Dominion Bankshares DATE: rlarch 30, 1990 a. This is an unconditional request to rezone two parcels of land. totalling approximately 7.6 acres. from A-1 to B-2. b. The specific uses for these parcels are not known at this time. The petitioner, Dominion Bankshares, would like to purchase the land for future, anticipated expansion of their operations. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS a. The B-2, General Commercial District permits a wide variety of commercial uses including office, retail, personal services, commercial kennels, nursing homes, and flea markets and public dance halls with special exception from the Board of Supervisors. The petitioner has not proffered to exclude any uses. b. The screening and buffering regulations of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance (Section 21-92) will apply to the development of these parcels of land. c. Site plan review will be required for any development on these sites to ensure compliance with all County regulations. d. Stormwater control regulations will be applied. 3. SITE CHARACTERISTICS a. Topography: This land is relatively flat. A drainage ditch and a small creek run through the piece of property that fronts on Plantation Road. b. Ground Cover: These parcels are mostly grass with deciduous and evergreen trees and shrubs. c. Improvements: There is an unoccupied brick house on the property that fronts on Plantation Road and an outbuilding. 1 ~' ... 4. AREA CHARACTERISTICS a. Future Growth Priority: Situated within the Peter's Creek Community Planning Area. The initiative is to stimulate ^rowth in this area. b. General area: Dominion Bankshares (B-1~ is located south and east of these parcels. Between Dominion Bankshares and the petitioner's parcels is a single-family residence (B-1) and to the immediate north, between the petitioner's parcel and Friendship Lane (Route 1895) are four single- family residences (A-1). Across Plantation Road (Route 115) to the west are several single-family residences (R- 1). Further north on Plantation Road are several commercial establishments. In general, the area is a mixture of industrial, commercial, and residential uses. Location and access to the I-81 interchange, will in all likelihood, in the absence of any other guidelines, dictate the future development of this area of Roanoke County. 5. LAND USE IMPACT ASSESSMENT Rating: Rate each factor according to the impact of the proposed action. Use a scale of 1 through S. 1 = positive impact. 2 = negligible impact, 3 = manageable impact, 4 = disruptive impact, 5 = severe impact, and N/A = not applicable. RATING FACTOR COMMENTS LAND USE COMPATIBILITY 3 a. Comprehensive Plan: 1985 Comprehensive Development Plan has placed this area within a Principal Industrial designation. This designation encourages industrial uses and finds the following specific uses desirable - agricultural industries, small industries, mining and extraction, conventional industries (such as warehouses and wholesalers), industrial parks and planned employment centers. Office, personal services, and retail convenience are of moderate compatibility. General retail is discouraged and residential uses are prohibited. The petitioner has not requested a land use map amendment. Although uses permitted in the B-2 district are not encouraged in the Principal Industrial designation, many of these uses, such as office and personal services are of moderate compatibility, are not discouraged or prohibited and do not require a land use map amendment. If the petitioner chooses to develop a motel/hotel or general retail uses on these properties, a land use plan amendment may be necessary at that time. 2 ~'"~'~ - ~ b. Surrounding Land: This land is in close proximity to Exit 43 of I-B1 and the intersection of Plantation Road (Route 115) and Peters Creek Road (Route 117). Industrial, commercial and residential uses are along Plantation Road north and south of this parcel. Friendsnlp Lane is predominately residential development. c. Neighboring Area: The area is a mixture of industrial, commercial and residential development. d. Site Layout: The required concept plan has not. been submitted. iv/A e. Architecture: Not available. Use of property not known at this time. f. Screening and Landscape: The development of these sites will have to be accomplished in compliance with the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance, Section 21-92, Screening and Buffering. 5 g. Amenities: The required concept plan has not been submitted. Amenities can not be evaluated. h. Natural Features: The site that fronts on Plantation Road has a small unnamed creek running across the property, parallel to Plantation Road. TRAFFIC 3 i. Street Capacities: Route 115 between Route 11 and I-81 had a 1986 average daily traffic count of 7,200 passenger cars and an additional 2,500 trucks for a total of 9,700 vehicles per day. Route 117 between Route 11 and Route 118 {Airport Road) had a 1986 average daily traffic count of 13,400 passenger cars and an additional 3,500 trucks for a total of 17,100 vehicles per day. Interstate 81 has approximately 20,000 vehicles per day travelling between Exits 42 and 44. In the absence of a concept plan, to estimate the potential traffic impact of this land being developed as a commercial site, assume an office building is built. The increase in daily traffic would be approximately 1,000 vehicles per day. There were two reported accidents on Route 115 and four on Route 117 in 1987. 4 j. Circulation: It is impossible to evaluate circulation since the required concept plan has not been submitted. 3 .~~`~ UTILITIES k. Water and Sewer: The proposed rezoning will not effect water and sewer, DRAINAGE m. Basin: This site is in the Tinker CreeK drainage basin. 3 n. Floodpiain: This site is not in the 100-year floodplain. PUBLIC SERVICES 3 0. Fire Protection: There are no anticipated difficulties in providing fire and emergency service to these sites. 3 p. Rescue: See above. N~ ~: q. Parks and Recreation: The potential commercial development of these sites will not effect parks and recreation services in the County. Nii=; r. Schools: The potential commercial development of these sites could affect the area schools through job creation and an influx of new employees and families from outside the area. The impact of this is impossible to determine at this point in time. Based on estimates from school administration personnel the local schools have capacity to handle this influx. TAX BASE N/A s. -Land and Improvement Value: Unknown -Taxable Gross Sales/Year: Unknown -Total Employees: Unknown -Total revenue to the County/Year: Unknown ENVIRONMENT 3 t. Air: Since the specific intended use of this land is not known, it is difficult to assess the air pollution impacts. The permitted uses in the B-2 district are not likely to be detrimental to the ambient air quality of Roanoke County. 3 u. Water: The permitted uses in the B-2 district are not likely to be detrimental to groundwater in Roanoke County. 3 v. Soils: Stormwater and erosion control will have to comply with Roanoke County regulations. 4 ~~ ~4',, w. Noise: (lost of the B-2 uses would not have a significant impact on noise quality. Commercial kennels are allowed in this district provideo they are fully enclosed and without exterior runs. Even with these restrictions, noise levels at surrounding residences could be a problem. 3 x. Signage: tJo proffer submitted. Would suggest that maximum Signage allocation not exceed one and one-quarter (1.25) square feet of sign area per 1 lineal foot of lot frontage. There are currently two off-premises signs on this property, which would be grandfathered. 6. PLAN CONSISTENCY This area is designated as Principal Industrial. While some of the B-2 commercial uses are not encouraged in this designation, they are of moderate compatibility. Other B-2 permitted uses, such as general retail, motels/hotels, and restaurants are discouraged in Principal Industrial and may require a land use map amendment. 7. STAFF EVALUATION a. Strengths: (1) If the petitioner expands their current operations onto this site in the form of office buildings and/or parking facilities the development will be moderately compatible with the Comprehensive Plan. b. Weaknesses: (1) The lack of a concept plan for development of this site poses problems in evaluating the site"s impacts on the surrounding land uses. (2) Petitioner has not_prnff.ered to gxclude any of the permitted uses in the B-2 district. (3) Petitioner has not submitted a concept plan to allow the staff and citizens a reasonable opportunity to review and comment on the potential impacts of this petition to rezone these parcels from agricultural to commercial uses. c. Proffiers Suggested: (1) The landowner should proffer to exclude the following uses: undertaking establishments and funeral homes; public billiard parlors, poolrooms, bowling alleys, golf driving ranges and similar forms of public amusement; animal hospitals or clinics and commercial kennels; flea markets; home for adults; clinics, hospitals and nursing homes; and public dance halls. (2) Limit Signage to 1.25 square feet per one lineal foot of public street frontage. 5 O Y •: '~..~~. ~~„ t `,v #~.1 ;~1 ~1s~-,t{~~ "• ~ _',;.~ Ae• ~ ~r;~ ~R.. ~ ~ ` ~ ,•_• _ 4~~,ti•r;. ; •.; •~ w y. ` ;~~ ~' ; f 1,,.• •1 ., ~ ~~ ; .r • 7f.~ .rx, I.*a i {.. , +(:•'~{~ ;'.may ~` ! R '~~.. ~~~'%'~;~ ~ ~1~y~1t;M ~ • t , n ' •~ ~ •! N •.. - 1`. A ~ . ~ ` ~•l'i~7,it r R-M'.y^<=M +- ~ r.M r. ti ~ ~ . 3 t '//^~ t •~ rte! S `, ' 6 J Z ~,'~ ~e~ `' ~. , t /' ~ 9 ~ ` ~~~~ 3 BDllc Yn-' .` .J ter} ~ ` ^ 14'0• ` 'J I ~ \ 10 p I ~I ,~•' \ ~ •\ ,,- F~d~` ~,. , - -- li _ ~~ u ,~'' ,. ~' ~~} 7- 6'N4 to r P~ ~ \ ~\ __ S(4 Aj'a'' *~ 9 1 ~r~ VO ~ 1 / y / ~ ~ .\ ./ \ p,` ^_ / \\ // `~~ `~ \ aw ,~ ~~~ ~ L ~\ ~ .\ 1 ,~ ~' i ~ ' ~~`\ .. ~ o 1 '~ i, ~ • ~ .~~ .,\ 1 ,,\ `{ • Is • _^! Ac ,` ~\ , ~' r \ ' is \ `, see ~ •.\ ~\ ~\ . // // ~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, APRIL 24, 1990 ORDINANCE TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A 7.64 ACRES TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED NORTH OF PLANTATION ROAD (TAX MAP NOS. 27.06- 5-2 and 27.06-5-9) IN THE HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A- 1 TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF B-2 WITH CONDITIONS UPON THE APPLICATION OF DOMINION BANKSHARES WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on March 27, 1990, and the second reading and public hearing was held April 24, 1990; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on April 3, 1990; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing 7.64 acres, as described herein, and located north of Plantation Road, (Tax Map Numbers 27.06-5-2 and 27.06-5- 9) in the Hollins Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of A-1, Agricultural District, to the zoning classification of B-2, General Commercial District. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of Dominion Bankshares. 3. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: PARCEL 1 BEGINNING at a point on the easterly line of Virginia Route No. 115, Plantation Road, corner to Roger Page, Jr. lot (see Deed Book 858, page 20), being corner No. 5 on the plat made ~; by C. B. Malcolm, S.C.E., dated September 11, 1943; thence with the said easterly line of said Virginia Route No. 115, Plantation Road, N. 19 deg. 20' W. 384.00 feet, more or less, to a point; thence still with the line of said Virginia Route No. 115, Plantation Road, N. 57 deg. 52' E. 10.0 feet to a point, corner to James A. Stephens' 30-foot wide parcel; thence with the southerly line of said James A. Stephens' 30- foot wide parcel, N. 57 deg. 52' E. 286.04 feet to a point; thence with the easterly line of said James A. Stephens' 30- wide parcel, N. 26 deg. 20' W. 30.0 feet to a point being the southeast corner of the Guy O. Plymale parcel (see Deed Book 553, page 525) and also being the southwest corner of the Alfred L. Hughes and wife lot (see Deed Book 505, page 458); thence with the southerly line of said Alfred L. Hughes and wife lot, N. 57 deg. 00' E. (N. 58 deg. 15' E.) 98.9 feet to a point, corner to Richard T. Dillon and wife parcel (see Deed Book 773, page 141) and also corner to O. H. Huffman land, and being corner No. 3 on the said C. B. Malcolm plat; thence with the line of said O. H. Huffman land, S. 23 deg. 52' E. 399 feet to a point on line of the First National Exchange Bank of Virginia (now Dominion Bank, National Association) tract, being corner No. 4 on said C. B. Malcolm plat; thence with the line of said First National Exchange Bank of Virginia (now Dominion Bank, National Association) and also Roger Page, Jr., lot S. 58 deg. 16' W. 427.0 feet to the place of BEGINNING less .333 acre parcel under separate contract with the Virginia Department of Transportation; and BEING the same property conveyed by Bertram H. Riley and Mary E. Riley by deed dated March 8, 1971, and of record in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, in Deed Book 913, page 503 LESS the .333 parcel under separate contract with the Virginia Department of Transportation. PARCEL 2 BEGINNING at an iron pin on the southerly line of Virginia Secondary Route No. 1895, corner to Tract 4 of the division of the lands of O. H. and Lila Huffman conveyed unto Raymond B. and Hazel H. Huffman in Deed Book 1004, page 686; thence with the line of said Tract 4, S. 29 deg. 51' 08" E. 525.81 feet to an iron pin, corner to the First National Exchange Bank (now Dominion Bank, National Association) parcel; thence with the same, S. 57 deg. 31' 40" W. 380.71 feet to an iron pin, corner to the lands formerly owned by G. H. and Mary E. Riley; thence with the same N. 21 deg. 37' 37" W. 318.91 feet to an iron pin, corner to the parcel of land formerly belonging to A. B. McDaniel and wife (Deed Book 463, page 277); thence with the same, N. 62 deg. 11' 18" E. 60.83 feet to an iron pin, corner also to said parcel formerly belonging to said A. B. McDaniel and wife; thence further with the same, N. 21 deg. 37' 37" W. 228.97 feet to an iron pin in the south line of said Virginia Secondary Route No. 1895; thence with ~JIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIillllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll II IIIIIIIIIIIIiIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIII,(J .; APPEARANCE REQUEST _ _ _ _ AGENDA ITEM NO. _ _ = SUBJECT ~~ 2~ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so that I may comment.WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW. __ c • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, o and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. = _ c • Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Ques- bons of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. __ • All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ~. • Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. • INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT c THEM. ~ V PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO DEPUTY CLERK _ . _ / NAME ; G ~~ ~ ~ ~c~w h c _ .-- ADDRESS 3~ ~ ~ / G~ L~ ~~ ~ ' ~~~~ . PHONE ~/c~ ~ ! ~ ~~~-X ~~ c mllllllllllilllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllilllllllllllllllllllllllillllilllllllllllllllillllllllllllllll~' ~~o - ~~ DOMINION Apri 1 18, 1990 BANKSHARES Ms. Janet Scheid Roanoke County Department of Planning and Zoning 3738 Brambleton Avenue, S.W. Roanoke, VA 24018 RE: Case No. 16-4/90: Dear Ms. Scheid: We proffer to exclude the following uses from our request for rezoning the subject property from A-1 to B-2: undertaking establishments and funeral homes; public billiard parlors, poolrooms, bowling alleys, golf driving ranges and similar forms of public amusement; animal hospitals or clinics and commercial kennels; flea markets; home for adults; clinics, hospitals and nursing homes; and public dance halls. We also proffer to limit our signage to 1.25 square feet per lineal foot of street frontage based on our understanding that that is the limit for B-2 zoned properties in the forthcoming Roanoke County signage ordinance. Finally, we express our willingness to comply with County ordinances in effect at the time that the site is developed, to include those pertaining to drainage and noise abatement. Sincerely, ,~' ~ / ~ ~ r 'Robert C. Leopard, Jr. Vice President RCLjr/pce ~/ _~ Q.c lv ~~ Rev. Larr Lykens CHURCH OF GOD AT A REGULAR MEETING OTHEHROANOKE COUNTYEADMINISTRATIONNCENTER~NTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT TUESDAY, APRIL 24, 1990 ORDINANCE 42490-13 AUTHORIZING A USE-NOT- PROVIDED-FOR PERMIT TO ALLOW SIXTEEN (16) CONCERTS LOCATED AT VALLEYPOINTE IN THE HOLLICATION OF T THE LEASTER SEAL SOCIETY TOF APP VIRGINIA, INC. WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on March 27, 1990, and the second reading and public hearing was held April 24, 1990; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on April 3, 1990; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That a use-not-provided-for permit allowing sixteen (16) summer concerts beginning May 17, 1990, through September 20, 1990, to be held on a certain tract of real estate containing 5.1 acres (Tax Map Number 37.07-1-14.4) located at Valleypointe Corporate Development Community in the Hollins Magisterial District is hereby authorized. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of The Easter Seal Society of Virginia, Inc. 3. That the effective date of this ordinance shall be April 24, 1990. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt ordinance amending that the permit is valid from May 17, 1990, to September 20, 1990, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES• Supervisors McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None ABSTAIN: Supervisor Eddy A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Development & Inspections Terry Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning John Willey, Director, Real Estate Assessment Paul Mahoney, County Attorney PETITIONER: EASTER SEAL SOCIETY OF VA ~~ 4 CASE NUMBER: 18-4/90 Planning Commission Hearing Date: April 3, 1990 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: April 24, 1990 A. REQUEST Petition of The Easter Seal Society of VA, Inc. to obtain a U oe rite PHollins For Permit to allow summer concerts, located in Valleyp Magisterial District. B. CITIZEN PARTIns ~ Ton to the request. There was no opp C. SIGNIFICANT IMPACT FACTORS 1. Site Layout: The concert aoren eds ark ng ar eas havoe been identified as Valleypointe development. Pr p P ark Drive (the portions of Valleypointe Parkway, Research Road, and Vallaved parking lots latter two are under construction) , as well as existing p and some graded undeveloped areas. However, petitioner has not submitted a detailed parking/access layout identifying the number of spaces available and the provisions for fire and rescue access. Staff asserts that adequate parking may be denerationt for h the expected A conservative estimate of the parking g attendance is 4 persmas ber Zar, 3r persons87peracar,g raising parking realistic estimate Y aces. requirements to over 1000 parking sp The existing proffers on the property prohibit any on-street parking, thus eliminating petitionerle p a koD aVearking areas on Valleypointe Parkway, Research Road, and Val yp roximatel 200 parking spaces in existing paved lots on the There are app Y site. Petitioner has indicated that Valleypointe lots 1 Pro idedcthat the undeveloped) will be graded and available for parking. entire 4 acres contained in these two lots is availab ovide a maximumaof an optimum parking layout is achieved, the lots may p 580 parking spaces. A lack of adequate parking may encourage attendees to park along the shoulders of Peters Creek and aal~ongcthesshouldersCof eKenwo th Road. tIn shoulders of Thirlane Rd., addition to the dangerous situations that would be created in each loca- tion for pedestrians, parking along Kenworth Road would interfere with the four trucking companies located on the road--a m.l All of these trucks companies have substantial truck traffic after 5 p. enter through the same signaled intersection as the concert traffic would. 2. Circulation: Entrance to th traffic turnmaroundlarealcurrently available Peters Creek Road. The only awed parking lots on Valleypointe on the site is through the existing p Parkway. All parking and circ ccess forlemergency veh c esnthroughout the and Rescue to ensure adequate a concert series. 3. Fire Protection: Wieh taken ainto consideration nasr the Wsite p ans care requirements will b reviewed. Access for emergency vehicles must be maintained during the events. 4. Rescue: See above. D. RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS Staff recommends that, if approved, for no more than a one year period. to review the request based on especially in regard to parking, access. E. COMMISSIONER'S MOTION, Mr. Massey moved to approv 17, 1990 through September roll call vote: AYES:Massey, Winstead, NAYS:None ABSENT: None F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE None. the Use Not Provided For Permit be issued This would provide staff the opportunity a known situation rather than unknown, traffic control, and emergency vehicle VOTE AND REASON e the petition for a 16-week period, beginning May 20, 1990. The motion carried with the following Witt, Robinson, Gordon Concept Plan Vicinity Map G. ATTACHMENTS: Staff Report Other \ `~~,/ Terrance Haringto, Secretary Roanoke County Planning Commission ~'~ w 1 STAFF REPORT t E NUMBER• 18-4/90 PETITIONER: Easter Seal Society of VA REVIEWED BY: Lynn Donihe DATE: April 3, 1990 Petition of The Easter Seal Society of Virginia, Inc. to obtain a Use Not Provided For Permit in order to hold a summer concert series at Valleypointe, located at the northeast intersection of Peters Creek Road and I-581 in the Hollins Magisterial District. 1, NATURE OF REQUEST a. Petition to obtain a Use Not Provided For Permit in order to hold a 16-week concert series at Valleypointe, one night a week, from May 17, 1990 through September 20, 1990. Petitioner expects the fund-raising event to attract 3000 - 3500 people per concert. Food, soft drinks, and alcoholic beverages (beer and wine coolers) will be available during the concerts. 2. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS a. The property is zoned M-1CX. Proffers on the property include the following: 6. That there will be no on-street parking. 10. That primary access to the property will be from Peters Creek Road. Legal counsel has advised staff that these proffers, accepted as part of the rezoning of the property on October 27, 1987, are applicable to all uses of the property, whether permanent or temporary, principal or accessory uses. Therefore, any use of the property contrary to the conditions will be in violation of the proffered conditions. b. A Use Not Provided For Permit is required since "outdoor concert" is not listed as a permitted use under any zoning district. c. Site Plan review will be required in order to assure conformance with County ordinances. 3. SITE CHARACTERISTICS a. Topography: Flat with some slight inclines. b. Ground Cover: Site is partially developed with existing structures and paved parking facilities. Remainder of site is wooded or cleared. 4. AREA CHARACTERISTICS a. Future Growth Priority: Situated within the Peters Creek Community Planning Area. Designated for future high growth, urban services available. b. General area is bounded by I-581 and Peters Creek Road and developed with commercial land uses. 5. LAND USE IMPACT ASSESSMENT Rating: Rate each factor according to the impact of the proposed action. Use a scale of 1 through 5. 1 = positive impact, 2 = negligible impact, 3 = manageable impact, 4 = disruptive impact, 5 = severe impact, and N/A = not applicable. ~~~ . 2 TING FACTOR COMMENTS LAND USE COMPATIBILITY ~ a. Comprehensive Plan: 1985 Comprehensive Development Plan has placed this area within a Principal Industrial land use category. The policies defined for this land use category are not designed for a temporary use such as an outdoor concert series. However, several of the characteristics and locational requirements of an outdoor concert are similar to those of heavy industry including: locations served by sufficient public street capacity, distance away from residential areas, traffic generation, and noise. ~ b. Surrounding Land: Surrounded by I-581, Peters Creek Road, commercial and heavy industrial uses, undeveloped land zoned for future industrial uses, and the airport clear zone. ~ c, Neighboring Area: See "b" above. Also, mobile home park across Peters Creek Road and residential development on north side of Valleypointe along Wood Haven Road. ~ d. Site Layout: The concert area is proposed for lots 2 and 3 of the Valleypointe development. Proposed parking areas have been identified as portions of Valleypointe Parkway, Research Road, and Valleypark Drive (the latter two are under construction), as well as existing paved parking lots and some graded undeveloped areas. However, petitioner has not submitted a detailed parking/access layout identifying the number of spaces available and the provisions for fire and rescue access. Staff asserts that adequate parking may be difficult to achieve on-site. A conservative estimate of the parking generation for the expected attendance is 4 persons per car, or 750 - 875 parking spaces. Amore realistic estimate may be 2 - 3 persons per car, raising parking requirements to over 1000 parking spaces. The existing proffers on the property prohibit any on-street parking, thus eliminating petitioner's proposed parking areas on Valleypointe Parkway, Research Road, and Valleypark Drive. There are approximately 200 parking spaces in existing paved lots on-the site. Petitioner has indicated that Valleypointe lots 1 and 16 (currently undeveloped) will be graded and available for parking. Provided that the entire 4 acres contained in these two lots is available for parking and an optimum parking layout is achieved, the lots may provide a maximum of 580 parking spaces. A lack of adequate parking may encourage attendees to park along the shoulders of Peters Creek Road, across Peters Creek Road along the shoulders of Thirlane Rd. , and along the shoulders of Kenworth Road. In addition to the dangerous situations that would be created in each location-for pedestrians, parking along Kenworth Road would interfere with the four trucking companies located on the road -- at least three of the companies have substantial truck traffic after 5:00 P.M. All of these trucks enter through the same signaled intersection as the concert traffic would. ~ e. Architecture: Temporary, structures, including stage, portable toilets, and food/drink/ticket tables. Some structures may remain in place throughout 16-week concert series. ~~;~ 3 ~~ f, Screening and Landscaping: ~A g, Amenities: I A h. Natural Features: TRAFFIC ~ i. Street Capacities: The current ADT for Peters Creek Road exceeds 20,000 vehicles per day. 4. j. Circulation: Entrance to the site is from the signalized intersection at Peters Creek Road. The only traffic turn-around area currently available on the site is through the existing paved parking lots on Valleypointe Parkway. All parking and circulation plans must be coordinated with Fire and Rescue to ensure adequate access for emergency vehicles throughout the concert series. UTILITIES ~A k, Water: 1, Sewer: DRAINAGE ~ m, Basin: Lick Run Basin ~• n. Floodplain: None PUBLIC SERVICES Fire Protection: Within established service standard. Water and 4 0, access requirements will be taken into consideration as the site plans are reviewed. Access for emergency vehicles must be maintained during the events. 4 p, Rescue: See "o" above. ~ q, Parks and Recreation: ~ r. School: TAX BASE ~ s. -Land and Improvement Value: -Taxable Gross Sales/Year: -Total Employees: -Total revenue to the County/Year: ENVIRONMENT ~ t. Air: ~ u, Water: ~ v. Soils: ~ w. Noise: Although the concerts would create additional noise in the area, the effects should be minimal since the site is buffered by two high-volume highways and additional commercial and industrial development. ~ ~o - ~J 4 x. Signage: Petitioner proposes banners for the corporate sponsors to be displayed the days of the events. Petitioner also proposes a sign near the entrance to Valleypointe advertising the concert series. (. PLAN CONSISTENCY This area is designated as Principal Industrial and, based on the characteristics similar to both heavy industry and an outdoor concert of the proposed magnitude, this request is compatible with the land use category. '7. STAFF EVALUATION a. Strengths: (1) Ingress and egress to the site are through a signaled intersection. (2) Type of use is compatible with the Principal Industrial land use category. b. Weaknesses: (1) Adequate parking may be difficult to achieve on- site. No detailed plans have been submitted. (2) Without detailed parking layout, adequacy of fire and rescue circulation and access cannot be determined. c. Proffers Suggested: None. d. Additional Recommendations: Staff recommends that, if approved, the Use Not Provided For Permit be issued for no more than a one year period. This would provide staff the opportunity to review the request based on a known situation rather than unknown, especially in regard to parking, traffic control, and emergency vehicle access. WOOD F~U{VEN ~--~,~ • VALLEYPOI~~(TE . • NORTH RO'~ A PLANNED CORPORATE ENVIRONMENT TMy z.a AC. Tlp ~_g ~ ices in phase I totaling 51 acres in Valleypointe are now available for 0 purchase, lease or build-to-suit, designed ' to meet the individual needs of each 3®. 3~0~' Closed company. End of Valle ointe, located in Roanoke , , ~ . Roadway YP -_ RESEARCH Ro,~ County, is the largest planned corporate O O environment in southwestern Virginia. The ® 2.1 ~, total site is 250 acres, fronting two miles Z•3 ~~ 12o spaces on Interstates 581 and 81 and is 4.1 AC. PHASE I - Barricade immediately adjacent to Roanoke 0 Q Regional Airport. W - 23,x, z.t ~~ For details, contact Lingerfelt Development Corporation. o, _ ~/ 4~ ' 00 Z ~ ~ iagonal Spaces u ~ ? 4.8 AC. 5.3 ~ ~ _® z =- ~- ~ A duality Development Of: ~ ; I t .o Ac. ~ - ~ y 200 ', III' LINGERFELT DEVELOPMENT ® !1 2.4 AC. I ~ ~~ 1 CpRppRATION 0.9 AC. t, ^ - - • 391... L' 12 South Third Street _ _ _ 1- -~- s _ _ = Richmond, Virginia 23219 ~i UNGEAFELT (8041 644-91 1 1 r - ~ _ ' 43 E - Entrance Parking Lot r-I 500 i i ~ _ Parking Areas (1,602 Space: I I I I ~ - Concert Area I I I I Seeking Approval for I_ ~ 1 t>v Additional Parking Areas ~ ~ ~ (800 spaces) I I I ~ ~ ~ ~ I y ~' 7 0 ~,. I N OO \~ ,w w NO PARKINI, ~~ ~~~"' ~ PETERS CREEK ROAD THIRLANE ROAD NO PARKING of f is ROANOKE NO PARKI ght REGIONAL AIRPORT ~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, APRIL 24, 1990 ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING A USE-NOT-PROVIDED-FOR PERMIT TO ALLOW SIXTEEN (16) CONCERTS LOCATED AT VALLEYPOINTE IN THE HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT UPON THE APPLICATION OF THE EASTER SEAL SOCIETY OF VIRGINIA, INC. WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on March 27, 1990, and the second reading and public hearing was held April 24, 1990; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on April 3, 1990; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That a use-not-provided-for permit allowing sixteen (16) summer concerts to be held on a certain tract of real estate containing 5.1 acres (Tax Map Number 37.07-1-14.4) located at Valleypointe Corporate Development Community in the Hollins Magisterial District is hereby authorized. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of The Easter Seal Society of Virginia, Inc. 3. That the effective date of this ordinance shall be April 24, 1990. j~ilillllillllllllllllllllllllllllllllilllillllllllllllllllllllllllllllll IIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIlIIIIIIIIIIIIIIiI~J _ - - - _ _ - - APPEARANCE REQUEST _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - ~ ~1 ~ AGENDA ITEM NO. ~ -~ ~`~~~'~`? ° ~ ~~ ~. = SUBJECT ~o N ~,~~ ~? ~'~ i°~ ;~~` ~,~ ,~ ~. ~. ~~~' p ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ' -_ = _ _ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so that I may comment.WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW. • Each s Baker will be iven between three to five minutes to comment p g whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will c decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to __ do otherwise. = • Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Ques- bons of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. • All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. __ • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. • Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. - • INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO DEPUTY CLERK -_ ~ ~~ ~ P °~ Lf 4~'d' IK'.~. ~ ~~~© ! ~~ i Oar ! ~° /~ ~J ~ (O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ; ADDRESS ~ ~ a ~ ~~ ~"+,~"` ~' ~l.~ ~ ~ ~~''' ,.~' ~ f J c ,, c PHONE '~`~ ~ ~, ~.e~~`~r m 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 Ililiiillllllllllllllllllllliillliillllllilillll~llililllllilllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllilllllllllii,~,l ~Iilllllillllillll ,~~, , ,,~~,,, ,, ~~ _ _ - _, - _ ~ - ARAN CE REQUEST _ APPE _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ AGENDA ITEM NO. ~~> `' ~~ ° ~~ _ _ // /J~~ ~ L J L Y L. _ SUBJECT ~ r ~ ~ ~~~'' ~ ~ ~ _ _ __ _ _ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to _ o nine me during the public hearing on the above matter rec g WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, so that I may comment. _ _ c _ I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR T c _ _ - RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINE _ _ LISTED BELOW. _ __ • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment _ whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will =_ decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on oard toes = and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the ma~onty of the B _ __ do otherwise. _ • S eakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Ques- -_ t pons of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. • All comments must be directed to the Boazd. Debate between arecognized '~ speaker and audience members is not allowed. c _ • h s eakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. __ Bot p • Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments _ _ with the clerk. _ c __ • INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION _ FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT _ _ '" THEM. c -_ PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO DEPUTY CLERK - -_ - t - NAME / - _ _ ADDRESS c -_ PHONE z_~ (~~ '~ --~ O (~'- ~. ~ ~ r Iilllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll 1 1 1 1 1 lllllliiliilillllllliiillllllillllilillliillillllllilllllllllillilllllilllillll mlllllll y~~-fi AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, APRIL 24, 1990 DENIAL OF ORDINANCE 42490-14 TO AMEND THE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION OF APPROXIMATELY 0.5 ACRE LOCATED AT 5304 MALVERN ROAD IN THE HOLLIN3 MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM NEIGHBORHOOD CONSERVATION TO TRANSITION AND TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION FROM R-1 TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION B-1 WITH CONDITIONS UPON THE APPLICATION OF IRVIN WARREN SIMPSON. WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on February 27, 1990, and the second reading and public hearing was held on April 24, 1990; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on March 6, 1990, and April 3, 1990; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: DENIED on motion of Supervisor Johnson, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None A COPY TE5TE: Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Development & Inspections Terry Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning John Willey, Director, Real Estate Assessment Paul Mahoney, County Attorney PETITIONER: IRVIN WARREN SIMg8ON t~lG~~j _ q~ CASE NUMBER: 12-3/90 l Planning Commission Hearing Date: March 6, 1990 and April 3, 1990 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: April 24, 1990 A. REQUEST Petition of Irvin Warren Simpson to amend the Future Land Use Plan map designation of approximately 0.5 acre from Neighborhood Conservation to Transition and to rezone said property from R-1 to B-1 for office use, located at 5304 Malvern Road, Hollins Magisterial District. B. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION Mr. Massey noted There was no one present in opposition; however, that there has been considerable citizen opposition since the property was posted--approximately 60 members of the Boxley Hills Neighborhood Association have expressed opposition to the request. C. SIGNIFICANT IMPACT FACTORS 1. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: 1985 Comprehensive Development Plan has placed this area within a Neighborhood Conservation land use category. Neighborhood Conservation areas designate established residential blocks where a combination of exclusive land use controls and restrictive performance standards must be in place to conserve the existing development pattern. The Neighborhood Conservation designation includes all parcels one block west of Malvern Road, and north as far as Dent Road. Since this designation is not appropriate for commercial uses, a land use amendment is requested in addition to the rezoning petition. The petitioner has submitted a request to amend the future land use plan from Neighborhood Conservation to Transition to accommodate the proposed parking expansion. The Transition designation attempts to specify particular highway frontage strips where orderly development is encouraged. The Transition designation includes all parcels east of subject site fronting on both sides of Williamson Road at approximate depths of 250-300' south to the city limits and north as far as Brookside Shopping Center. Staff evaluation of the land use determinants for Transition areas is summarized below: - Highway frontage. Petitioner's property does not have direct frontage on an arterial or major collector street although Malvern Road does serve as a minor collector based on County transportation plan criteria. - Land use pattern. Business development has not occurred at this location. However, strip commercial development pressure continues to increase along the Williamson Road Corridor. - Existing zoning. Strip commercial zoning has not been instituted at this location. - Surrounding land use. An office proposal at this site could be viewed as a logical buffer between conflicting land uses (e.g. retail commercial and single family residential) or possibly as a commercial invasion into an established residential neighborhood. ~'~o - ~ - Topography. Subject location is physically oriented toward Malvern Road and is downhill from and poorly oriented toward Williamson Road. - Urban sector. Petitioner's site lies within urban service area. Based on the above land use determinants, it is staff's opinion that a plan map amendment would not be appropriate for this site considering such factors as topography and the established single family residential community subject to impact from this proposal. 2. SURROUNDING LAND: Single-family residential; retail and service commercial; heavily traveled secondary road. 3. FIRE PROTECTION: Not within established service standard. Available flow is not sufficient for proposed zoning at this location. Hollins fire station is located 2.5 miles northwest of site. D. PROFFERED CONDITIONS 1. The existing structure will be used only as an office. E. COMMISSIONER'S MOTION, VOTE AND REASON Mr. Massey moved to deny the land use amendment saying that the area is a neighborhood environment and should remain designated as Neighborhood Conservation. Mr. Winstead agreed and said the issue here concerns the whole block--what will happen to the rest of the residents, where do you draw the line? The motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Massey, Winstead, Witt, Robinson NAYS: Gordon ABSENT: None Mr. Massey moved to deny the petition and said the rezoning is inconsistent with the land use plan. The motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Massey, Winstead, Witt, Robinson, Gordon NAYS: None ABSENT: None F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE Mr. Gordon said that he is agreeable to the Transition designation noting the problems and more intense uses in the area. G. ATTACHMENTS: Concept Plan Staff Report _~ ~ Terrance Haring Roanoke County Vicinity Map Other .._ / , Ito Secretary P anning Commission STAFF REPORT ~~~ CASE NUMBER: 12-3/90 REVIEWED BY: TIM BEARD PETITIONER: IRVIN WARREN SIMPSON DATE: APRIL 3, 1990 Petition of Irvin Warren Simpson to amend the Future Land Use Plan map designation of approximately 0.5 acre from Neighborhood Conservation to Transition and to rezone said property from R-1 to B-1 for office use, located at 5304 Malvern Road, Hollins Magisterial District. NATURE OF REQUEST a. Conditional request to utilize an existing residence for unspecified office use(s). b. Attached concept plan and vicinity map describe project more fully. APPLICABLE REGULATIONB a. B-1 zoning permits a variety of office uses including administrative, executive, editorial, professional, and medical offices. Limited residential and institutional uses are also permitted. Petitioner has proffered that the existing structure will be used only as an office. b. VDOT commercial entrance permit required. c. Site plan review required to ensure compliance with County regulations. SITE CHARACTERISTICB TOPOGRAPHY: Predominantly flat; westernmost 25 feet of rear yard drops to a recessed area formerly used as a garden. GROUND COVER: Existing columned two-story brick dwelling with screened back porch and detached garage; concrete driveway, grass, mature hardwoods and evergreen trees. AREA CHARACTERISTICS FUTURE GROWTH PRIORITY: Situated within the Peters Creek Community Planning Area; designated for stimulated growth. The site lies within the urban service area. GENERAL AREA is developed with single-family residential, retail and service commercial and office uses. LAND USE IMPACT ASSESSMENT Rating: Rate each factor according to the impact of the proposed action. Use a scale of 1 through 5. 1 = positive impact, 2 = negligible impact, 3 = manageable impact, 4.= disruptive impact, 5 = severe impact, and N/A = not applicable. TIN FACTOR COMMENTS l ~~~ LAND IISE COMPATIBILI 4 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: 1985 Comprehensive Development Plan has placed this area within a Neighborhood Conservation land use category. Neighborhood Conservation areas designate established residential blocks where a combination of exclusive land use controls and restrictive performance standards must be in place to conserve the existing development pattern. The Neighborhood Conservation designation includes all parcels one block west of Malvern Road, and north as far as Dent Road. Since this designation is not appropriate for commercial uses, a land use amendment is requested in addition to the rezoning petition. The petitioner has submitted a request to amend the future land use plan from Neighborhood Conservation to Transition to accommodate the proposed parking expansion. The Transition designation attempts to specify particular highway frontage strips where orderly development is encouraged. The Transition designation includes all parcels east of subject site fronting on both sides of Williamson Road at approximate depths of 250-300 feet south to the city limits and north as far as Brookside Shopping Center. Staff evaluation of the land use determinants for Transition areas is summarized below: - Highway frontage. Petitioner's property does not have direct frontage on an arterial or major collector street although Malvern Road does serve as a minor collector based on County transportation plan criteria. - Land use pattern. Business development has not occurred at this location. However, strip commercial development pressure continues to increase along the Williamson Road Corridor. - Existing zoning. Strip commercial zoning has not been instituted at this location. - Surrounding land use. An office proposal at this site could be viewed as a logical buffer between conflicting land uses (e.g. retail commercial and single family residential) or possibly as a commercial invasion into an established residential neighborhood. - Topography. Subject location is physically oriented toward Malvern Road and is downhill from and poorly oriented toward Williamson Road. - Urban sector. Petitioner's site lies within urban service area. Based on the above land use determinants, it is staff's opinion that a plan map amendment would not be appropriate for this site considering such factors as topography and the established single family residential community subject to impact from this proposal. ~ BIIRROUNDING LAND: Single-family residential; retail and service commercial; heavily traveled secondary road. 3 NEIGHBORING AREA: Single-family residential; general commercial; arterial highway. ~ BITE LAYODT: Property is currently accessed by one paved entrance from Malvern Road. Concept plan indicates it useable parking spaces and access from both Malvern Road and Nelms Lane. Layout substantially complies with minimum County access and parking design standards and screening and buffering requirements for commercial development. On-site stormwater detention will be required (to be addressed through formal plan review). X90 - ~ ARCHITECTURES Existing two-story brick structure with screened back porch; detached brick garage. ~ BCREENINa AND LANDSCAPING: Per ordinance. Concept plan complies with all minimum buffer yard and planting requirements. An undetermined number of mature evergreen trees on site's southern border will be lost in order to provide access at Nelms Lane. 3 AMENITIES: Provision of sufficient parking likely with + 2,000 sq.ft. of gross leaseable area (GLA) in the building. Minimum County requirement for general office use is one space per 250 sq.ft. of GLA. Space #8 on petitioner's concept plan does not provide adequate backup area and would not be permitted. 3 NATURAL FEATURES: Subject site represents a portion of a large depression and has served as a catch-basin for stormwater from Williamson Road to the east and Malvern Hills to the north and west. TRAFFIC 3 STREET CAPACITIES: 1986 ADT--US 11: 16,415. VA 839 (Malvern Road: 1,255. VA 840 (Nelms Lane): 561. Anticipated additional ADT 30-40 vehicle trip ends per day. 1987 accidents: 4 at US 11-VA 839 intersection; 1 at VA 839-VA 840 intersection. 3 CIRCULATION: Concept plan is feasible for one-way traffic entering from Nelms Lane and exiting at Malvern Road indicated by either ground markings or signs. Two-way interior traffic is not possible and would not be required provided adequate safety is ensured as outlined above. The existing garage would be eliminated under this concept. Modifications to rear of main building may also be required. UTILITIES 2 WATER: Adequate source and distribution for domestic purposes. ~ BEWER: Adequate treatment and transmission. DRAINAGE 2 BASIN: Tinker Creek subbasin. 3 FLOODPLAIN: Although not located in a federally designated flood hazard area, engineering staff reports that petitioner's site is prone to flooding and ponding of water due to the absence of a drainage outlet. Relief for this problem is scheduled for later this year through the Nelms Lane drainage project. Also petitioner will have to provide on-site stormwater detention. PUBLIC BERVICEB ~ FIRE PROTECTION: Not within established service standard. Available flow is not sufficient for proposed zoning at this location. Hollins fire station is located 2.5 miles northwest of site. ~ RESCIIBs Within established service standard. PARRS AND RECREATION: SCHOOLS: SAX BASE LAND AND IIdPROVEMENT VALOEi $62,100 TA%ABLE GRO88 SALES/YEAR: Unknown TOTAL EMPLOYEES: Unknown TOTAL REVENUE TO THE COUNTY/YEAR: current real estate value only). ENVIRONMENT 2 AIR: 2 WATER: ~ SOILS: ~9a - 9 Approximately $714 (reflects 2 NOISE: g SIGNAGE: Not specified. See requested proffer. PLAN CONSISTENCY This area is designated as Neighborhood Conservation. Petitioner's request is inconsistent with the land use plan map and stated policies, specifically, NC-1 (protect residential neighborhoods from the disruptive impacts of land use changes) and NC-4 (maintain open space, yards and grounds in residential neighborhoods). The proposal is consistent with policy NC-2 (provide screening and buffering of adjacent land use changes along neighborhood perimeter). Petitioner has submitted a request to amend the land use map designation from Neighborhood Conservation to Transition. Staff does not support petitioner's request and recommends the future land use map designation remain Neighborhood Conservation at this site. STAFF EVALUATION STRENGTHS: 1) Petitioner has proffered that the existing structure will only be used as an office. WEAKNESSES: 1) Proposal is inconsistent with policies NC-1 and NC-4. 2) Existing water system will not provide adequate fire flow for commercial use. PROFFERS SUGGESTED: 1) The existing building will not be enlarged. 2) Total signage square footage shall not exceed 50 sq.ft. and no portable or temporary signs shall be installed. ~~~ Irvin Warren Simpson y30~t Malvern Road , NW Roanoke, Yir6inia 2~t{~12 Jam~ary 201990 County of Roanoke Department of Planning and Zonin6 Po Box 29oW Roanoke, Virginia 2+01 u-0'!9~ Attentions Jonathan W. Hartley, Planner Dear Mr. Hartley; I would like to request a chan6e in Zoning for the attached property iron n - 1 to B ~ 1. Since buying this house for sy residence in 19'/x+, Wore businesses have moved into the area. with the Williamson Road Cruising problem ithis is no lon6er a desireable location for a dwelling. Rezoning to B - 1 would enhance the value of this property. It's visibility iron, and proximity to Williamson Road could enhance its use. The zoning change would enable ie to sell this property commercially. Thant you for the help and consideration that you have iven se in this matter. If further information is needed can be ,reached by phone at 362-291+ or 9'I'/-2234• _ !•s I•s~ ~~ ~ ~..~ 'fly. i- yE-LL ~y mar=. ~s <-c 4a. •.. -c....l E •- ~ 'C c `[4' -I `[`~ ~ r/J /< ~ J Yours truly, Irvin Warren Si=peon 730`* Malvern Road, Nw Roanoke, Virsinia 2+012 Attachnents~ 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Rezoning Application Map of Area Plat ~?ap Metes and Bounds Sewerage Application List of Adjacent Owners Concept Plan c a ~ • a `~ J ~ ~~ .~ ~~~ z ~~ y9~-9 .,. . Y ------ ---- r t ~_ n G ~ ~Li ---- - --- I 1 ~_ ~ ~ ` ~ ~ ~c - ~,, 'r ~__ ~ f • C1 • ~ i ~_; - ~ h 1 ~ ~ ~ ~= . ~; ~ ~` ~- • 1 ` ~ ~_- ~ -~= p `~-- K • a ~~ =_ • ~ / .. ~ ~- .- ~. `~ ~. ,. ~_ . • - - _ _ -~~1-_ ~, • ~ _, `~c T • (° ~ E ~ ,~ l "~T C~ ~, .~- ~ ~ r. ~_ 4 ~? d ~~' -r `_J --1 :~ ~, :~~ ~'~ ~, ~_- _, _~ .~ ~l y^~~ Lh~~ i'-~ r ,-, L ,tit .S C. p ~ -^1~ .L ~~,r tix.. ? o f ~2o4r ~ KP C, t~ '~ r K •;i' r ~. BOJrL E Y PROPER7^Y ~~~ ~N.M.E - - ---- -IV.f.3-e Jf•E-+ L/V.SH-»r~t _ -- 1 No/. ) _ - - -LO - - - - Is.S4- - - 1Y. fl - /I/. 7 - SI.J7 - 15.78 - - L-s ~- i... O ~,~„ n..n.4 - ri //j.o ~ ~,r~~ z~ 31 v ¢ 0 3 a Z ~ ~ ~. BLG~CIf~ ~ ~ ~ " ' '' ~s ~ ~` o ~ ecacK N°3 0 0 /1/.!7 ~ ~ Q ~I ' 1~ ~ h Q D/.!~ ~'• .j /./ - W- 259.0•%/.~ I.1. i • t /4.0 ~J•S3•' f4 • . AVENUE ,~: ~ ~~'. ° RAYMOND q' /I2.:+ liLl7 lO.A ,.i i _ ~•4t ^/. S3! f4'E- 756.71"/./+G~/ _-iil. ~ /I/.n O•frt~ 1 p Dt.y°~ y~ e~ • h B ''~''~ o sn' ~ ~,'~ 9 v ~ n0.a '~ ~ '~ ~ 0, 1 ~ 1 ~ r i ~ ~ 'v,~st ' /IO,p ~ 1 /3933 ; Q ~~E ~' i ~ ' ~ W f ~ i ~ 1 b 3 ~0 V 7 ~ O f /O ~ ~~ /IO.p J 0 ' 1 ~ ~ 13L.7S ~ O ~ ' ~ • • f /zo.n I ~ ~ 0 6 ~ b .3 ~ o N ~ K I ~ 3 ~ o ! y ~ o ~ ~ ~~jl I ~ ~ S ~ ~3 1 ~ r ~ ~ l S ~' [ /I ~ ~ /zv. o . 1 ~t ~ i ,~ ~ ~ :c ~f ` ~ o No ask ! 1~1 ~ o ~ ;r.1~ e ~ /IO.o o h 3 /29.oi ' ti ~ ~ ~- j/ .1 'V fS V ~' ' 0 3 r , O ~ 3 ~ Bodo ~ ~. ~ ~ 3 ~ r ~ !¢ v M rto.o ~ V ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ /26.4, ,e ~ ^ /S O i1o.o Y~ ~ l As?i ~Si ~ i ,, Z r r /23.g `1 1'~l.S.'OO:E w 1 _~~ • ~ J. f 0 A ; /TO.p i SO• ~~ ' N62.32,E \~ - , '. y~~± o- ~~~~~ 1'~ Q a ~ S' ~ ~ e•~° 6 ~b v 1 v~tP~~ 5 ~ ~ ~- ~ ~ t p 1 s' .ti.~ r e ^ e°t¢;,°,!t~°,y a ~. ~.y,.• ~ f a ~ ~'~~ ~ 1 ~ ~ • 1' lO.iF y_ r 3 /21.14 4,' S' /Cs.67' zb~w- /s/.s3 Ji.i.- ii. /it.6i • S ~ Q NE ~ /_ _' _ ~ - - ,,•r ~ NELMS __a69 ~~H• . cc~a.n~z A/rrt_ _ tl~s ~ -~'~,isd ,4pJ~ •~ c' Piapaus! fi~rfiie K/~~e~v~~ ~.f 53. Z6' • t I J. __-- \ ` /lixr ~_ - - w.'3 OR. A NDERS N PROD ~ ~,! die iir ~f EoarP ar- ~~~' ~ ~. r.r..~ _ ..>._.... Plat Flap ~~'~ - ~' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, APRIL 24, 1990 ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION OF APPROXIMATELY 0.5 ACRE LO- CATED AT 5304 MALVERN ROAD IN THE HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM NEIGHBORHOOD CONSER- VATION TO TRANSITION AND TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION FROM R-1 TO THE ZONING CLASS- IFICATION B-1 WITH CONDITIONS UPON THE APPLI- CATION OF IRVIN WARREN SIMPSON. WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on February 27, 1990, and the second reading and public hearing was held on April 24, 1990; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on March 6, 1990, and April 3, 1990; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the Future Land Use Plan map designation of a certain tract of real estate containing approximately 0.5 acre, as describ- ed herein, owned by Irvin Warren Simpson and located at 5304 Malvern Road in the Hollins Magisterial District be changed from Neighborhood Conservation to Transition; and 2. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing approximately 0.5 acre, as described herein, owned by Irvin Warren Simpson and located at 5304 Malvern Road in the Hollins Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of R-1, Single Family Residential District, to the zoning classification of B-1, Office District. 3. That this action is taken upon the application of Irvin Warren Simpson. ~~a' ~' 4. That the owner has voluntarily proffered in writing the following condition which the Board of Supervisors hereby accepts: (a) The existing structure will be used only as an office. 5. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: Beginning at an iron pin on the northerly side of Nelms Lane, said beginning point being 20 feet S. 53 deg. 26' W. from the intersection of the northerly side of Nelms Lane with the southerly side of Malvern Road produced; thence with the northerly side of Nelms lane 53 deg. 26' W. 102.49 feet to an iron pin; thence with the westerly lines of Lot 1 and Lot 2, according to the Revised Map of Malvern Hills, Block 2, N. 25 deg. 00' W. 141.00 feet to an iron pin in the rear line of Lot 2; thence with a new division line through Lot 2, Block 2, Revised Map of Malvern Hills N. 65 deg. 00' E. 120.0 feet to an iron pin on the westerly side of Malvern Road; thence with the western side of Malvern Road, S. 25 deg. 00' E. 96.44 feet to a concrete monument at a point of curve; thence with a curve line to the right whose tangent is 20.0 feet, having a radius of 24.5 feet, an arc distance of 33.54 feet to an iron pin on the northerly side of Nelms Lane, the Place of Beginning, and being all of Lot 1 and the southerly 49 feet of Lot 2, Block 2, according to the Revised Map of Malvern Hills, recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia; and BEING the same property conveyed unto the Grantor herein by Linda W. Simpson Young and Philip Maton Young, her husband, by deed dated January 4, 1984, of record in the aforesaid Clerk's office in Deed Book 1202, page 1712, and further being the same property conveyed by deed dated February 5, 1974, of record in the aforesaid Clerk's Office in Deed Book 990, page 619. 6. That the effective date of this ordinance shall be April 24, 1990. 11111111 I I IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIilllllll IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIillll Iillllllllll Iillllllllllll IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII I I I I IJ,11 ~ ~ ~ _ - - _ ,~ _ -~ APPEARANCE REQUEST - - - - - - - - - - - - - AGENDA ITEM NO. '~~° ~ ~ - _ _ .. c -_ SUBJECT= ~-°6 ~ - - I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to __ - recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter = - so that I may comment.WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, - I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE - RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES - - - LISTED BELOW. _ • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment _ =_ whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will c - decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, _ and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to - - - - '- do otherwise. - __ - • Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Ques- =__ tions of clarification may be entertained by the Chauman. Debate between a recognized • All comments must be directed to the Board. - speaker and audience members is not allowed. __ _ _ • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. __ • Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments c with the clerk. c =_ • INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED - °- GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION __ FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT - - THEM. - PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO DEPUTY CLERK _ _ -_ - - - NAME -r~ W~-reN ~'~ __ _ _ - - - - ADDRESS S'3d~ ~ l~~ ~ R~ il/ ~/ ~e~n~~, ~ ara,_ - _ PHONE ~ T~- 2 z a y _ _ mllllllillllilllllllllllllllllllilllllillil l l lliillllllllllllllllllllilillllllllilllllillllllillllllllllllllllllllllllllllllilill II IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII I I III IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIillllllllllllllilllllllllllllllllllllllllllillllllllll IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIllJ j~lllll _ ..~ , ~ _ i r ;~ APPEARANCE REQUEST _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ AGENDA ITEM NO. ~~~~ ~~~ __ _ SUBJECT ~~Z~/ ,. ~o~'EI2~. ~%~'~ / - / ~ 1 _ _ _ _ _ _ = I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to = _ - reco nize me during the public hearing on the above matter so that I may comment.WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, _ _ _ I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FORTH _ _ _ _ RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES _ _ __ LISTED BELOW. _ • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment -_ whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, = and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the ma~onty of the Board to do otherwise. _ • Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Ques- =__ bons of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. Debate between a recognized • All comments must be directed to the Board. _ speaker and audience members is not allowed. __ • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. _ • Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments c with the clerk. __ • INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED = '- GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION __ FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO DEPUTY CLERK - - - - - - NAME / ~~ d~~v'`?r?~,/ -_ r-- - ADDRESS ~ 7 ~ .3 ~ ~~ _ ~~ Sr l yo/ c PHONE c millilllllilllllilllllllllllllllliillliilllilllllllllillllllllllllllllllliilliilllliilllllllillillllilllllillllllllllllllllllil ACTION N0. ITEM NUMBER ~::~---- AT A REGULAR MELDIAT THE ROANOKER COUNTY ADMINISTRATIONRCENTER COUNTY, VIRGINIA H MEETING DATE: April 24, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: First Reading of an Ordinance Accepting an Offer and Authorizing the Conveyance of a Storm Sewer Easement to the Town of Vinton COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND: The Town oft rm sewers pel ne bei.ngrconstructed asaaepart agreement for a s P ect. The total of the Glade Town neighborhood improvements prof easement within the County of Roanoke's boundary is southeasterly .887 acres, extending from Chestnut Avenue, approximately 602 ft., and then turning easterly for an additional 86 ft. The easement will lay in the normal drainage area and does not interrupt any of the recreational opportunities at the Craig Avenue Center. ALTERNATIVES AND IMPACT: FISCAL IMPACT STATEMENT: The Town of Vinton has offered $1 as consideration for said offer. RECOMMENDATION• Staff recommends that pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.01 of the Charter of Roanoke County, that the subje ubpi~pusey be declared surplus and be made available for other p i.e. storm sewer easement; that the offer of the Town of Vinton of consideration in the amount of $1 be accepted and that the County Administrator be authorized to execute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County as are necessary to accomplish the conveyance of said easement. Upon form approved by the County Attorney, the attached ordinance outlines the provisions and legal requirements of this transaction. ~ -/ Respectfully submitted, Approved by, ~ Elmer C. Hodge ohn M. Chambli s, Jr. County Administrator Assistant Administrator ____________ ---------------- VOTE ------------------ ACTION No Yes Abs Approved ( ) Motion by: Eddy Denied ( ) Johnson Received ( ) McGraw Referred ( ) Nickens To ( ) Robers JMC/cw Attachment cc: Paul Mahoney John Hubbard Steve Carpenter T- / AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT TUESDAAyN,OAPRIL 24Y 1990NISTRATION CENTER, ORDIE~ANCE OFC ATSTORM SEWER EASEMENT ATOHTHE TO TOF CONV VINTON BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.01 of the Charter of Roanoke County, the subject property has been declared to be surplus and is being made available for other public uses, i.e. storm sewer easement; and 2. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading concerning the disposition of the subject property was held on April 24, 1990; a second reading was held on May 8, 1990; and 3. That the sixty (60') foot storm sewer easement consists of .887 acre and is located on property owned by Roanoke County on Chestnut Avenue in the Vinton Magisterial District; and 4. That the offer of the Town of Vinton in the amount of One Dollar ($1.00) is hereby accepted and all other offers are rejected; and 5. That the proceeds from the sale of the easement are to be allocated to the capital reserves of Roanoke County; and 6. That the County Administrator is authorized to execute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County as are necessary to accomplish the conveyance of said easement, all of which shall be upon form approved by the County Attorney. t AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, APRIL 24, 1990 ORDINANCE 42490-15 AUTHORIZING THE ACCEPTANCE AND ACQUISITION OF SURPLUS REAL ESTATE FROM THE ROANORE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD, AND FURTHER, AUTHORIZING THE CONVEYANCE OF SAME TO THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter, the acquisition and disposition of real estate can be authorized only by ordinance. A first reading of the amended ordinance was held on April 10, 1990; and a second reading was held on April 24, 1990. 2. That the County School Board of Roanoke County on March 8, 1990, adopted a resolution declaring Parcel A (Parcels 044 and 074 of the Cave Spring Junior High School site) to be surplus property pursuant to Section 22.1-129 of the Code of Virginia (1950), as amended. 3. That the County School Board of Roanoke County on March 22, 1990, adopted a resolution declaring Parcel B (a portion of the former Eaton Property) to be surplus property pursuant to Section 22.1-129 of the Code of Virginia (1950), as amended. 4. That the acceptance and acquisition of certain real estate located along Route 221 in front of the Cave Spring Junior High School Site and identified as Parcel A (Parcels 044 and 074 as shown on Sheets 10, 11 and 10D of the plans for Route 221, State Highway Project 0221-080-107, RW201) and Parcel B (a portion of the former Eaton Property as shown on Sheets 11 and 12 of the plans for Route 221, State Highway Project 0221-080-107, RW201) from the Roanoke County School Board is hereby authorized. 5. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.01 of the Charter of Roanoke County, the subject real estate is being made available to the Commonwealth of Virginia for other public uses, namely, the widening of State Route 221. 6. That the offer of the Virginia Department of Transportation in the amount of $73,632 for the acquisition of Parcel A and improvements and $63,220 for the acquisition of Parcel B and improvements is hereby accepted and shall be credited to the School Capital Outlay Fund, and the conveyance of the real estate described above to the Virginia Department of Transportation for other public uses is hereby authorized and approved. 7. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized to execute such documents and take such actions as may be necessary to accomplish these transactions, all of which shall be on form approved by the County Attorney. On motion of Supervisor Johnson, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: ~- Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Paul Mahoney, County Attorney John Willey, Director, Real Estate Assessment Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance Reta Busher, Director, Management & Budget Dr. Bayes Wilson, Superintendent, Roanoke County Schools Fred C. Altizer, Resident Engineer, Virginia Department of Transportation ACTION NO. j ITEM NO. ... ` AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: April 24, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE ACCEPTANCE AND ACQUISITION OF SURPLUS REAL ESTATE FROM THE ROANOKE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD, AND FURTHER, AUTHORIZING THE CON- VEYANCE OF SAME TO THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND' The Virginia Department of Transportation is in the process of acquiring the rights-of-way needed for the widening of Route 221. This road passes in front of Cave Spring Junior High School. This matter originally appeared on the Board's agenda for the March 27, 1990, meeting involing only Parcel A as set out below. Since that time the conveyance of property (Parcel B - approximately 3.350 acres) adjoining Cave Spring Junior High School from Pauline M. Eaton to the County School Board of Roanoke County has been accomplished. On March 22, 1990, a portion of the Eaton property was declared surplus by the County School Board of Roanoke County for the widening of Route 221 by the Virginia Department of Transportation (Project 0221-080-107, RW201). SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The rights-of-way needed include the following real estate: Parcel A 19,635 square feet of land and is identified as Parcels 044 and 074 as shown on Sheets 10, 11 and lOD of the plans for Route 221, State Highway Project 0221-080-107, RW201. The offer to cover this transaction and all related damages is $73,632, which the County Assessor has agreed is the fair market value. Parcel B Approximately 0.056 acres plus approximately 0.05 acre for permanent right and eastment for construction and maintenance of drainage structures and approximately 0.46 acre for a temporary easement as shown on Sheets 11 and 12 of the plans for Route 221, State Highway Project 0221-080-107, RW201. The offer to cover this transaction and all related damages is $63,220, which the County Assessor has agreed is the fair market value. ~-/ This ordinance authorizes the acceptance of this real estate from the School Board and the conveyance of this property to the Commonwealth of Virginia for the widening of State Route 221 in front of Cave Spring Junior High School. The first reading of the proposed ordinance involving Parcel A was held on March 27, 1990. Staff suggests amending that ordinance to include the additional parcel (Parcel B, the former Eaton property) and to hold the first reading on the amended ordinance on April 10, 1990; the second reading to be held on April 24, 1990. ALTERNATIVES AND IMPACTS: The Virginia Department of Transportation has offered $73,632 for the acquisition of Parcel A and improvements and $63,220 for the acquisition of Parcel B and improvements. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the acceptance of these offers, the con- veyance of this property to the Virginia Department of Transporta- tion, and crediting $136,852 to the School Capital Outlay Fund. Staff recommends that the first reading of this ordinance be held on April 10, 1990, and that the second reading of this ordinance be held on April 24, 1990, and that the County Adminis- trator be authorized to execute the necessary documents to consummate this transaction. Respectfully submitted, ~r\ . ,r~, Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney Action Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by Eddy Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers Vote No Yes Abs ~-/ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, APRIL 24, 1990 ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE ACCEPTANCE AND ACQUISITION OF SURPLUS REAL ESTATE FROM THE ROANOKE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD, AND FURTHER, AUTHORIZING THE CONVEYANCE OF SAME TO THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter, the acquisition and disposition of real estate can be authorized only by ordinance. A first reading of the amended ordinance was held on April 10, 1990; and a second reading was held on April 24, 1990. 2. That the County School Board of Roanoke County on March 8, 1990, adopted a resolution declaring Parcel A (Parcels 044 and 074 of the Cave Spring Junior High School site) to be surplus property pursuant to Section 22.1-129 of the Code of Virginia (1950), as amended. 3. That the County School Board of Roanoke County on March 22, 1990, adopted a resolution declaring Parcel B (a portion of the former Eaton Property) to be surplus property pursuant to Section 22.1-129 of the Code of Virginia (1950), as amended. 4. That the acceptance and acquisition of certain real estate located along Route 221 in front of the Cave Spring Junior High School Site and identified as Parcel A (Parcels 044 and 074 as shown on Sheets 10, 11 and 10D of the plans for Route 221, State Highway Project 0221-080-107, RW201) and Parcel B (a portion of the former Eaton Property as shown on Sheets 11 and 12 of the plans for L..L - ~ Route 221, State Highway Project 0221-080-107, RW201) from the Roanoke County School Board is hereby authorized. 5. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.01 of the Charter of Roanoke County, the subject real estate is being made available to the Commonwealth of Virginia for other public uses, namely, the widening of State Route 221. 6. That the offer of the Virginia Department of Transportation in the amount of $73,632 for the acquisition of Parcel A and improvements and $63,220 for the acquisition of Parcel B and improvements is hereby accepted and shall be credited to the School Capital Outlay Fund, and the conveyance of the real estate described above to the Virginia Department of Transportation for other public uses is hereby authorized and approved. 7. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized to execute such documents and take such actions as may be necessary to accomplish these transactions, all of which shall be on form approved by the County Attorney. r- AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, APRIL 24, 1990 ORDINANCE 42490-16 AUTHORIZING THE CONSTRUCTION OF A PUBLIC SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM TO SERVE A SPECIAL SANITARY SEWER SERVICE AREA INCLUDING REAL ESTATE ALONG HIGHFIELDS AND LAREDALE ROAD, THE COSTS THEREOF TO BE IMPOSED UPON CERTAIN ABUTTING PROPERTY OWNERS BY AGREEMENT, PROVIDING FUNDS THEREFOR, AND DIRECTING THAT AN ABSTRACT OF THIS ORDINANCE BE RECORDED SHOWING THE AMOUNT THAT WILL BE ASSESSED AGAINST EACH SUCH LANDOWNER WHEREAS, it is the judgment of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that a new public sanitary sewer system should be constructed as hereinafter provided, and that the cost thereof be assessed by contract to certain landowners, as provided by law; and WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 112288-7 adopted by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, pursuant to authority found in Article 2, Chapter 7 of Title 15.1 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, authorizes the County to impose certain costs upon benefiting property owners for certain local public works improvements; and WHEREAS, certain abutting and benefiting property owners have agreed to share in the equitable allocation and apportionment of the construction costs for said improvements; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on April 10, 1990; and the second reading of this ordinance was held on April 24, 1990. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the construction of a new public sanitary sewer system to serve a special sanitary sewer service area in the County of Roanoke which includes certain properties along Highfields and Lakedale Road is hereby authorized. This special sanitary sewer service area is designated on a certain map which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. 2. That the estimated cost of this sanitary sewer project is $67,600. In consideration of the execution and performance of those contracts entered into between the abutting and benefiting landowners and Roanoke County, the County shall administer, construct, and finance this public sanitary sewer project. The property owners agree to pay a proportionate share of the cost of the construction of this project. Each abutting and benefiting property owner, in accordance with the terms and provisions of said contract, agrees to pay to the County the special sanitary sewer connection fee of $5,200. This $5,200 fee includes the off-site sewer facilities fee which will be credited against the cost of the project . The special sanitary sewer connection fee shall include the individual service lateral from the main sewer line located within a public easement adjacent to the property to the edge of that easement, and the installation of a sewer lateral cleanout. A private sewer service line from the cleanout to a structure on the private property is the responsibility of the property owner, as well as any required plumbing permits. 3. That each property owner has paid the sum of Fifty Dollars ($50) of the connection fee upon the execution of the contract with the County. An additional payment on the balance in a sum of Four Hundred Fifty Dollars ($450) shall be paid on or before May 1, 1990. The landowner further agrees to pay the balance of the special sanitary sewer connection fee ($4,700) either by July 1, 1990, or in seventy-two (72) equal monthly installments beginning July 1, 1990, unless otherwise specifically approved by the County. The interest rate of these installments shall be eight percent (8%) of the unpaid balance. 4. That the property owner shall execute a promissory note and a lien document or instrument which shall be recorded among the records of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia. This lien instrument or document shall secure the repayment of the promissory note by the property owner to the County and shall be a lien against the property and shall be satisfied upon any conveyance of the property. The property owner further agrees to pay the County any Clerk's fees for recordation costs which may be required to record said lien instrument or document in the office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court. 5. That any property owner within the special sanitary sewer service area applying for public sewer service after July 1, 1990, and within six years (6) after the completion of construction of this project, shall pay a total sanitary sewer connection fee which shall include: a special sanitary sewer connection fee of Five Thousand Two Hundred Dollars ($5,200), the off-site sewer facility fee in effect at the time of application, and the basic connection fee in effect at the time of application. This total sanitary sewer connection fee shall be due and payable prior to the connection to the public sewer system and no installment payment financing by the County shall be available under the provisions of this ordinance. 6. That the County Administrator is authorized to execute, ratify, and confirm on behalf of the County those contracts offered by the property owners and to execute such other documents and take such further actions as may be required to accomplish the purposes of this ordinance, all upon approval as to form by the County Attorney. 7. That this ordinance shall take effect immediately. On motion of Supervisor Eddy, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: 7 / L_~X ~f 1 ~-- ~ Q~ Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Cliff Craig, Director, Utilities Phillip Henry, Director, Engineering Arnold Covey, Director, Development & Inspections Terry Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning John Willey, Director, Real Estate Assessment Paul Mahoney, County Attorney Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance ACTION # ITEM NUMBER ~ -.Z AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: April 24, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: Ordinance Authorizing Highfields Sanitary Sewer Project COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND' The residents that live along Highfields and Lakedale Road petitioned Roanoke County to supply public sanitary sewer service under provisions of the County Code relative to Petition for Public Works Improvements. On February 28, 1989, the Board of Supervisors authorized staff to initiate the project and complete an engineering study to establish the cost of a sanitary sewer project to serve this area. The engineering study was completed and agreements sent to the property owners in July 1989. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The County has received executed agreements from 13 residents along with the required $50 payment. A sample of the agreement is attached for your information. The project cost is estimated to be $67,600 which is $5,200 per lot. If this project is approved by the Board, the project for a water system upgrade in the Highfields area will be constructed concurrently to minimize cost and inconvenience of the projects. The first reading of an ordinance authorizing this project was held on April 10, 1990. ALTERNATIVES AND IMPACTS: The cost of the sewer projects will be paid for by the participating residents. The residents can elect to finance $4,700 of the cost with the County for a period of six years and at an interest rate of 8~. -~ STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors give final approval for the Highfields Sanitary Sewer Project and adopt the ordinance after second reading authorizing the project. SUBMITTED BY: Cliff d Cr ig, .E Utility Director Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by: ACTION APPROVED: Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator VOTE No Yes Abs Eddy Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers r ..~.- Z.`J- NORTH ~. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, APRIL 24, 1990 ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE CONSTRUCTION OF A PUBLIC SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM TO SERVE A SPECIAL SANITARY SEWER SERVICE AREA INCLUDING REAL ESTATE ALONG HIGHFIELDS AND LAKEDALE ROAD, THE COSTS THEREOF TO BE IMPOSED UPON CERTAIN ABUTTING PROPERTY OWNERS BY AGREEMENT, PROVIDING FUNDS THEREFOR, AND DIRECTING THAT AN ABSTRACT OF THIS ORDINANCE BE RECORDED SHOWING THE AMOUNT THAT WILL BE ASSESSED AGAINST EACH SUCH LANDOWNER WHEREAS, it is the judgment of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that a new public sanitary sewer system should be constructed as hereinafter provided, and that the cost thereof be assessed by contract to certain landowners, as provided by law; and WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 112288-7 adopted by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, pursuant to authority found in Article 2, Chapter 7 of Title 15.1 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, authorizes the County to impose certain costs upon benefiting property owners for certain local public works improvements; and WHEREAS, certain abutting and benefiting property owners have agreed to share in the equitable allocation and apportionment of the construction costs for said improvements; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on April 10, 1990; and the second reading of this ordinance was held on April 24, 1990. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the construction of a new public sanitary sewer system to serve a special sanitary sewer service area in the County -,;~, of Roanoke which includes certain properties along Highfields and Lakedale Road is hereby authorized. This special sanitary sewer service area is designated on a certain map which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. 2 . That the estimated cost of this sanitary sewer project is $67,600. In consideration of the execution and performance of those contracts entered into between the abutting and benefiting landowners and Roanoke County, the County shall administer, construct, and finance this public sanitary sewer project. The property owners agree to pay a proportionate share of the cost of the construction of this project. Each abutting and benefiting property owner, in accordance with the terms and provisions of said contract, agrees to pay to the County the special sanitary sewer connection fee of $5,200. This $5,200 fee includes the off-site sewer facilities fee which will be credited against the cost of the project . The special sanitary sewer connection fee shall include the individual service lateral from the main sewer line located within a public easement adjacent to the property to the edge of that easement, and the installation of a sewer lateral cleanout. A private sewer service line from the cleanout to a structure on the private property is the responsibility of the property owner, as well as any required plumbing permits. 3. That each property owner has paid the sum of Fifty Dollars ($50) of the connection fee upon the execution of the contract with the County. An additional payment on the balance in a sum of Four Hundred Fifty Dollars ($450) shall be paid on or - `~ before May 1, 1990. The landowner further agrees to pay the balance of the special sanitary sewer connection fee ($4,700) either by July 1, 1990, or in seventy-two (72) equal monthly installments beginning July 1, 1990, unless otherwise specifically approved by the County. The interest rate of these installments shall be eight percent (8~) of the unpaid balance. 4. That the property owner shall execute a promissory note and a lien document or instrument which shall be recorded among the records of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia. This lien instrument or document shall secure the repayment of the promissory note by the property owner to the County and shall be a lien against the property and shall be satisfied upon any conveyance of the property. The property owner further agrees to pay the County any Clerk's fees for recordation costs which may be required to record said lien instrument or document in the office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court. 5. That any property owner within the special sanitary sewer service area applying for public sewer service after July 1, 1990, and within six years (6) after the completion of construction of this project, shall pay a total sanitary sewer connection fee which shall include: a special sanitary sewer connection fee of Five Thousand Two Hundred Dollars ($5,200), the off-site sewer facility fee in effect at the time of application, and the basic connection fee in effect at the time of application. This total sanitary sewer connection fee shall be due and payable prior to the connection to the public sewer system and no installment payment financing by the County shall be available under the provisions of ~' this ordinance. 6. That the County Administrator is authorized to execute, ratify, and confirm on behalf of the County those contracts offered by the property owners and to execute such other documents and take such further actions as may be required to accomplish the purposes of this ordinance, all upon approval as to form by the County Attorney. 7. That this ordinance shall take effect immediately. MEMORANDUM TO: Board of Su ervisors ©-~- FROM: E er C. odge;~County Administrator DATE: April 20, 1990 SUBJECT: April 24, 1990 Budget Work Session Attached for your review are the following items: • Agenda for Budget Work Session • Handout for Residents attending the Public Hearing • List of Personnel movement due to the creation of the new County Police Department • List of proposed User Fee changes • Proposed changes to the FY 1990-91 Budget • Revised list of Potential New Revenue Sources County of Roanoke FY 1990-91 Budget Work Session April 24, 1990 AGENDA • Spring Hollow Reservoir. Request of a work session with the Board of Supervisors on June 12, 1990 to discuss the financing alternatives for the Spring Hollow Reservoir. • Market Survev. Discussion of methodology and results. • Personnel Allocation Between the Sheriff and Police Departments. Discussion of those positions removed from the Compensation Board payroll. • User Fees. Outline of proposed user fee increases. • Discussion of Progosed FY 1990-91 Budget. • Budget Calendar Revisions. If necessary, additional work sessions can be scheduled. All-AMERICA CI1Y County of Roanoke ~ ~ ~ ~ FY 1990-91 Budget Public Hearing - April 24, 1990 ~~9~8~9 Budget Priorities Established by the Board of Supervis rs • Landfill and Recycling • Bond Improvements Plan • Employee Benefits • Economies/Efficiencies • Economic Development • Public Safety • Education Ta_ S Adopted Authorized 1____ 990 _ 19 1 Real Estate $ 1.15 $ 1.13 3.SU 3.50 Personal Property 3,00 3.U0 Machinery and Tools Proposed General Fund Revenues Dollar Bud et g 0 Projected FY 1990-91 Increase De rease ~___.~-----~-- Percent hap e FY 1989-9 Local Revenue Sources: Real Estate Tax $ 28,511,770 $ 30,979,000 000 300 1 $ 2,467,230 215,000 8.7°l0 19.8% Public Svc. Corp. Tax nal Property Tax P 1085 000 11,650,000 , , 13,000,000 0 1,350,000 000 100 11.6% 2.4% erso Sales Tax 4,200,000 2 100 000 4,300,00 2,150,000 , 50,000 2 4°~0 9% 1 Business License Tax Motor Vehicle License Tax 1,325,000 1,350,000 000 400 1 25,000 _0_ . 0.0% Utility Consumer Tax 1,400,000 000 700 1 , , 1,800,000 100,000 5.9% 16 5% Meals Tax Other Local Revenues , , 2,520,208 2,936,450 -0- 416,242 (525 00~ . 1 0.0 Beginning Fund Balance -0 $ 55 016.978 $ 59 215.450 4 198 472 $ 7,6 0 Sub-Total Local Other Revenue Sources: 670 336 $ 7 $ 7,569,000 232,330 $ 3.2% ~Q Commonwealth Federal , , -0- 670 $ 7 336 -0- $ 7,569,000 -0- $ 232,330 3.2% Sub-Total Other , , Total General Fund $ 62.353,648 $ 66,784,450 4,430,802 $ Revenues REAL ESTATE TAXES County of Roanoke FY 1990-91 Budget Work Session Positions Included in the Sheriffs Office and Police Department April 24, 1990 Sheriffs Office (Including Jail): Quantity Compensation Board Approved Positions 66 Block Grant Positions --~-- 81 Police Department: Locally Funded Positions (Including New Police Chief 104 Proposed New Positions 5 109 Total Authorized Positions 190 Positions Removed from Compensation Board Payroll 1 Secretary 38 Deputy Sheriffs 7 Dispatchers 46 Total °° °°~°°°°°o° ° °_°oa°ooo ° ~~~ 1 ,1 ., a ~ a .. d 4 d d i t Y y t ~~ ~~ t ` ~ u ~ ~ a om o ° .~. ~+ o ~ ` ~ .ea o 0 w Y ~ 1 .~. ..~ « r. « « o a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 °0 0 0 °o N v o c o o ~ ° ° :e :a al v o 00 0 ° - - - .. e z o 1 ~. N .~ .mss o c v - m ~„~ i w ~ n ~ ~ ~. 0 0 oe c. 1 a , u 1 °' ~ 1 v y U 0 i ~ = i Y ! ~ ~ ~ ~ m N U' C d ~ O m O N w ^' ~ m Z •--~ .--i t t e~ N N o e7 n N w rt ~ rt ~ ~ D C 6. ~ t ~ ~ V O O O O ~ R' ° wMww 'y M d N C d m V] C U O ~ V W oa b O !Y ~'-~ O i O^ ~ O ip ~ N 0 0 0~ .~.~ O O m j O _ oa aD O O - m ` ao .--~ ~..~ s.'J s..a y N O U N• ~. .-n R 1 1 1 11 ,O Oo t ~ m N m O m+ O N ~ m G to Ww .ca wa N a~a N 11 11 R' d d m O~ 1 O O O 1 y. O O ~O N u'a ~ .. t O ~ ,..1 m ~O V m 0 O O ° a~a 1 so N ~e'a ~ ~ e O H G so 00 O OO ~ '..~ ~~ ~ o O V` v! W N 1 V oC 1 11 C ~ 1 11 11 ^~ 1 ~ P _ ° ~ ~ ~ N N~ ~= N d W M. tr. V t ri O N ~ ~~ N N N N y v y 1 ~ 1.. rt so 0 0 0 .°. d y 0 y .' _ _ 0 0 ~ .~ w .~ w ~. ~ ~ en ~ym+ ~ a ~ 0 ^. N o. b . o~. ~ a, ..+ . .. v rn ae b " c y ~ ... e ~.a : ~ n ~ e w a v. y •+ .' ... c ~ _ _ a e ~ o .~ a v. s .~. U a. .~ _ a a .-. ~ o. u u c~ c~ a~ c y~ y _ O. d ~ ! d N N O •> ~ ~ C P. y m d Oc - o. ~ 1 c °° c m y °° U t C y ti 0 0 d G C ~ . m ~ 09 ` a V H ~ Oo o y ~ h C C~~ T 1 h h .~ Ov N T m M d Y~ U U N S O OG v i t Y O C O d v. W .7 b d 1 G 4 ~ ~ N O. 0 C 1 .p t •O N aC ~ ! C O -p b_ N , O O. O. Z Discussion of Proposed Parks and Recreation User Fee Changes April 24, 1990 Attached are worksheets related to the Parks & Recreation fee proposals to begin July 1, 1990. This study is based upon participation for the 1988-89 fiscal year and utilizes costs for recovery based upon the 1989-90 fiscal year. For purposes of illustration, the General Fund cost represented for each cost center is that of the cost center's budget for the 1989-90 fiscal year. The administrative cost is the prorata share of the recreation division administrative cost. For adult and youth athletics, the ball field maintenance cost is a share of the grounds maintenance budget, based upon 10% of such cost for adult athletics and 20% of such cost for youth athletics, as represented in the consultant's report. These indirect costs were then applied to the percentages recommended in the previous staff report for calculation. The direct cost (from the fee class fund accounts) represents the cost previously paid to instructors, officials and for consumable supplies, which are already being recovered and should be included as a direct cost. The consultant's report was not inclusive of all programs being offered by the Department, therefore it became necessary to treat each of these revenue projections based upon historical participation and budgeted costs. Because these fees are elastic in nature (participation may drop off as a result of increased fees), it should be noted that the revenue projections were modified by 15% for elasticity. Attached for your review is a schedule of the courses which have been offered during the first three quarters of the current fiscal year, to point out the projected minimum participation requirements and to illustrate the cancellation of courses which did not meet these expectations. In a few controlled incidents, marginal classes were held when there were other classes which had been over subscribed, to make up the additional cost. Our policy for the future will be to hold the line on the minimum requirements for each class offered. The policy for recreational fees should be as follows: 1) For activities included under community education, leisure arts, outdoor adventure and adult athletics, the fee should be based upon a $5 registration fee per participant, plus 20% of the indirect cost, plus 100% of the direct cost. 2) For youth athletics, the fee should be based upon a $5 registration fee per participant, plus 10% of the indirect cost, plus 100% of the direct cost. 3) For special events, the budget should plan to recover 35% of the indirect cost and 100% of the direct cost. 4) For therapeutics, there shall be a $10 registration fee, plus 20% of direct cost recovery. 5) For senior citizens, there shall be a $10 membership fee, plus 100% of direct cost associated with the program. No funds have been included in the $166,126 for membership fee revenue due to the uncertainty of the level of participation in the Senior Citizens program area. We do not know how many of the 2,860 participants in FY 1988-89 were individuals who participated in one or more programs. The membership fee is a once a year charge, not a per-event charge as is to the registration fee proposed for the other activities. Finally, we would propose that non-resident registration and membership fees be double that of resident fees. With the adoption of this fee policy and by policing classes which do not obtain minimum participation, we should better be able to control the utilization of our facilities and the quality of programs offered. y v o d ~r Y F U O ! i va OG Li0 Z OO F ~ U Ow Z CD Gb ce ae z ~ ou x N o y s i = F .~ ~ F a i OG CA t C O a a. oz. s J ! F F aC O I i F 1 R] U 1 F F a j i F 1 ~--~ F ..~ F 1 m 1 O .~ ! y-' 1 V F 1 tr] Y I F I U OO G T [b m oe o .tea rF-1 M ~ ~ o ~ o E- c F m ~ a o i M S h F u ! J ~ O t S ~_ U [a~ d. .o a, 1 o~ _ _ _ _ 1 N N M M 1 - 1 1 1 1 «• 1 1 1 1 ~ K ~ 6 m ~o O 1 to O r ^ 1 1 w M I 1 1 ~~ ; 1 1 1 1 ~ k 1 O O 1 _ 1 M M N I M 1 1 1 1 N I! 1 u's O 1 N M 1 i ~Ca )t! 1 1 ,.~ ~ 1 0 0 0 1 o O 1 ti ~ w O 1 _ I I I I w I rr ~ ~ r C O o~ O~ N O N N O O 1 N W _ _ _ __ 0 0 0 0 0 ~ i i « .~. « w rr ~~ 1 w 1 ~~ ~ 1 1 1 .ca N .ra ao ~ i O M ~ ~ ao O v~a 6 ~a O u'a N N O M ~~ N M 1 ~ 1 ap >1! Oa O N O N oa N 1 O ti O ~+ •"~ 1 i cam- O so I 1 1 I .. 1 w M M w p. M aro 1 M M I +ir S I w 1 Ctl T 1 O 1 I 1 U OD F F OC .~ '~ I F F 4-~ D rv ! U CC 00 Y d m m ~^. U F F S T 1U-~ m O ~ F CO F O O O U Q/ Z F ~. m U Z ~ U Izr S 00 ~ ~. i m F 00 va y. F Ob rr d ~. Z O~] i 2 4 U R. ['~ O~. OO U i S. tr] 0 0 .. x m 0 ~ .-. ~ z a cc Z S C O F - F Ca O F V ~W O O O ~-+ 4-~ U v~ 4'a ~ O-. ~ Z Ca. i .~ O d' O 7! F Od ~-r p.. pp Z [G F U M d F! F cC oC C aC GG Op y! [z. ~ O m F C 2 O h 4= m G C CC ` Ur"^ OC Ucb .~ Lz~ U d U tr.. [~ F .~ u ! m u p Z J F O. O OC F S U V V V V tr] OG i O ~ ~--~ 0? Y m Y T Y I 1--1 U U m F K D F ! C i t i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 O O O 1 O O O I 1 1 O 1 1 I ti 1 w 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 O O O I 1 w O M I 1 a 1 I to 1 1 O O O O O O O i 1 N w i i ref O O 1 ~~ 1 1 _ I ~ O O 1 1 1 rr y M m ^~ 6] Z ~. m Y H ~ S m CO OO OG m C w m x mm Ct~ R OO z ao H d m ry Cr.. S S O m ~ C cC O m m m Z 07 ~ OSO = CTG Z Y S C. I 00 M I = OO I Z ~++ FC VI 1 Y F Z I G4 2 O I OC i oC F_ m m h m C R. R rr F V h I 'S. 2 m ~-'r O O d' m I t s O ~ GC CC Oo y t/F~ m Z m m V V = y ~ m m 1 O. CC Z CC Z M U I 1 M OO 1 00 Op 1 ~ R 1 2 CO OO 7 ~ I C 00 I 7 I C N (a OC I F I U F p0 Z 1 OD ~ O.. G+ V 1 i fn 1 F J T i U F i h ..7 00 OO 'v Z 6] cC Cza m O T tr. Q. i OO a' .Or C i G i i 2 F m z oe :~ m u.. O m F m ~ U S ~--~ 00 h f/1 605. Or] Lz] J J OO m Z S SUM891 SUMMER 1989 PARTIC. MINIMUM ACTUAL REVENUE SECTION PROGRAM FEE REQUIRED REGISTERE D STATUS GENERATED LEISURE ARTS CERAMICS THURS PM 22.00 12 9 198.00 LITTLE ARTISTS 10.00 8 13 130.00 POTTERY WED AM 40.00 7 8 320.00 UNTAMED T-SHIRTS 12.50 8 8 100.00 PASTELS 25.00 8 3 75.00 DRAWING 25.00 8 6 150.00 PAINTING W/PEYTON 25.00 8 7 175.00 PAPERMAKING 20.00 8 10 200.00 YOUTH POTTERY 28.00 4 1 196.00 FINE ARTS CAMP 45.00 6 6 270.00 CERAMICS MON PM 22.00 12 12 264.00 CRAFTS CAMP 45.00 6 6 270.00 CERAMICS THURS AM 22.00 12 16 352.00 POTTERY TOES PM 40.00 1 12 480.00 POTTERY WED PM 40.00 7 7 280.00 YOUTH HAVEN II 12.00 12 144.00 YOUTH POTTERY 28.00 4 4 112.00 • KID'S VIDEOS I 0.00 0 6 0.00 CERAMICS WED PM • 22.00 12 24 308.00 KID'S ,VIDEOS II 0.00 0 6 0.00 POTERY WKSHP 15.00 3 45.00 INTRO TO BALLROOM DA 12.00 8 5 60.00 BEG. WATERCOLOR 42.00 8 13 ~ 54b.00 CULINARY HERBS 13.50 7 9 121.50 PAINTING OUTING 17.00 6 1 CANCELLED CRAFTS CAMP 45.00 6 3 CANCELLED SCHERENSCHNITTE I 8.50 6 1 CANCELLED BEG. TATTING 20.00 1 0 CANCELLED FINE ARTS CAMP 45.00 6 2 CANCELLED BEG. CROCHET 20.00 7 1 CANCELLED GLASS ETCHING 21.00 6 2 CANCELLED SCHERENSCHNITTE II 8.50 6 0 CANCELLED VWCC 30.00 0 0 CANCELLED CROCHET 25.00 7 1 CANCELLED BEG. KNITTING 20.00 7 1 CANCELLED T-SHIRT PAINTING 4.00 7 0 CANCELLED INTRO TO CLAY 0.00 GROUP CANCELLED POTTERY SAT AH 40.00 7 2 CANCELLED 'OTALS BASED ON CLASSES HELD 160 202 4,196.50 SUM891 SUMMER 1989 PARTIC. MINIMUM ACTUAL REVENUE SECTION PROGRAM FEE REQUIRED REGISTERED STATUS GENERATED COMMUNITY EDUCATION BEGINNER GYMNASTICS 25.00 7 8 200.00 MOVIN' AND GROOVIN' 12.00 12 15 180.00 PRE-SCHOOL GYMNASTIC 20.00 1 7 140.00 CAKE DECORATING 6.50 6 8 52.00 AEROBICS 24.00 12 29 696.00 TODDLER TIME II 12.00 12 12 144.00 CERAMIC WKSHP 0.00 0 5 0.00 TODDLER TIME I 12.00 12 11 132.00 KARATE 56.25 18 18 1,012.50 FITNESS 12.00 12 14 168.00 PRE-SCHOOL GYMNASTIC 20.00 1 9 180.00 CALLIGRAPHY 23.00 12 9 207.00 CERAMICS. 18.00 8 8 144.00 DRAWING 25.00 11 9 225.00 OOG OBEDIENCE 25.00 J 14 350.00 AEROBICS 0.00 0 8 0.00 ' PRE-SCHOOL GYMNASTIC 20.00 7 8 160.00 ' BIG BRUSH CANVAS 12.00 8 2 CANCELLED - RAISING SELF-ESTEEM 20.00 ii i CANCELLED BEGINNER GYMNASTICS 25.00 7 3 CANCELLED BEGINNER GYMNASTICS 25.00 7 3 CANCELLED YOUTH CERAMICS 27.50 8 1 CANCELLED .. PRETTY PUNCH 5.00 5 0 CANCELLED .YOUTH CERAMICS 15.00 13 0 CANCELLED DRAWING 25.00 11 1 CANCELLED BODY SHAPING 15.00 7 3 CANCELLED YOUTH ARTS & CRAFTS 15.00 12 0 CANCELLED YOUTH ARTS & CRAFTS 47.00 12 0 CANCELLED CERAMICS 18.00 12 1 CANCELLED YOUTH ARTS & CRAFTS ----------------- 47.00 12 1 CANCELLED ------------- TOTALS BASED ON CLASSES HELD -------- --------- 275 ---------- 208 ----------- ---------- 3,990.50 :.~. FAL891 .~.~~.~»~~~~»~~...a~.~..»~~.~ FALL 1989 »..a»~. PARTIC .»>.~~_ MINIMUM ~~~~.a--==.=sue=~== ACTUAL .~..~~»._. ACTUAL SECTION PROGRAM FEE REQUIRED REGISTERE STATUS REVENUE LEISURE ARTS YOUTH BALLET 22.00 8 14 308.00 CERAMICS MON P.M. 30.00 13 20 600.00 CHRISTMAS CRAFTS 10.00 6 8 80.00 BEG. DRAWING 42.00 8 4 168.00 BON DAZZLERS II 4.20 10 I5 63.00 YOUTH HAVEN 9.00 0 9 81.00 BOW DAZZLERS 6:30-9:30PM 1.00 6 20 140.00 TIN PUNCH BASKETS 12.00 8 6 72.00 NIGHTCLUB DANCE II 25.00 8 11 275.00 TUES PM POTTERY 50.00 1 8 400.00 HOLIDAY PARTY FOODS 7.50 11 15 112.50 WED PM POTTERY 50.00 7 12 600.00 PAPERMAKING 20.00 8 8 160.00 SAT AM POTTERY 50.00 1 1 50.00 NIGHTCLUB DANCE I 25.00 8 15 375.00 GALLERY DESIGNER T-SHIRT 20.00 7 8 160.00 CALLIGRAPHY 42.00 8 10 420.00 '_ ALL SPOOKED UP 11.00 6 6 66.00 • CERAMICS WED P.M. 30.00 13 19 570.00 CERAMICS THURS PM 30.00 13 20 600.00 CERAMICS THURS AM 30.00 11 20 600.00 CU8 SCOUTS 0.00 0 11 0.00 PAINTING W/PEYTON 43.00 _ 8 11 473.00 THURS PM POTTERY 50.00 7 6 300.00 YOGA 23.00 9 7 161.00 TOLE PAINTING WKSHP SANT 0.00 0 3 0.00 WATERCOLOR 42.00 8 10 420.00 " YOUTH POTTERY 28.00 4 7 196.00 BEG. 35MM PHOTOGRAPHY 25.00 6 6 150.00 POTTERY WORKSHOP 20.00 0 6 120.00 WED AM POTTERY 50.00 7 11 550.00 CLAY DAY 10.00 6 9 90.00 DRAWING WORKSHOP 35.00 8 8 280.00 CONVERSATIONAL FRENCH 45.00 8 0 CANCELLED BOW DAZZLERS 1-3:30 7.00 6 1 CANCELLED " INTRO TO COLORED PENCIL 33.00 8 3 CANCELLED POTTERY VWCC 30.00 12 CANCELLED KNITTING FUNDAMENTALS AM 35.00 8 1 CANCELLED SATURDAY CHILDREN'S ART 25.00 7 5 CANCELLED GLASS ETCHING WKSHP 21.00 6 0 CANCELLED SATURDAY STUDIO ART 25.00 7 4 CANCELLED SO. CHRISTMAS SHOW TOUR 29.00 38 10 CANCELLED ~. _ FAL891 FALL 1989 PARTIC MINIMUM ACTUAL ACTUAL SECTION PROGRAM FEE REQUIRED REGISTERE STATUS REVENUE CAKE DECORATING 15.00 5 0 CANCELLED TATTING-ORNAMENTS 25.00 7 0 CANCELLED INTRO TO CLAY 0.00 CANCELLED YOGA (WELLNESS/CO.EMPLOY 13.00 10 2 CANCELLED BASKETWEAVING(SHAKER) 21.00 4 3 CANCELLED HOLIDAY CANDIES 7.50 5 4 CANCELLED CROCHET 25.00 7 1 CANCELLED KNITTING FUNDAMENTALS PM 35.00 8 3 CANCELLED BASKETHEAVING(FLOWER) 21.00 4 1 CANCELLED YOUTH POTTERY --------- 28.00 4 1 CANCELLED --------- TOTALS OF CLASSES HELD --------- --------- 236 --------- 344 -------------------- 8,640.50 COMMUNITY EDUCATION DOG OBEDIENCE 25.00 8 9 225.00 PRE-SCHOOL GYMNASTICS 28.00 12 12 336.00 TODDLER TIME 20.00 15 14 280.00 MODELING 0.00 0 7 0.00 FITNESS 24.00 12 12 288,00 PRE SCHOOL GYMNASTICS 28.00 I2 12 336.00 BATON-ADVANCED 8.00 12 11 88.00 FLORAL DESIGN 60.00 15 it 660.00 BATON-SENIORS 8.00 12 13 104.00 CERAMICS 18.00 7 10 180.00 •. BATON-JUNIORS 8.00 12 _ 15 120.00 DOG OBEDIENCE 25.00 8 9 225.00 BATON-BEGINNER 8.00 .12 11 88.00 BEGINNER GYMNASTICS 32.00 12 12 384.00 PRE-SCHOOL GYMNASTICS 28.00 12 12 336.00 DECORATIVE SWEATSHIRT 7.50 6 13 97.50 AFTER SCH FOR KIDS(ASK) 25 WK 15 19 5,700.00 BODYSHAPING 15.00 8 11 165.00 AFTER SCH FOR KIDS(ASK) 25WK 15 41 25,625.00 AEROBICS 28.00 20 50 1,400.00 KARATE-BEGINNER 25.00 12 12 300.00 KARATE-ADVANCED 25.00 12 0 CANCELLED CAKE DECORATING 6.50 6 0 CANCELLED AEROBICS 38.00 15 1 CANCELLED DECORATIVE BASKETS 7.50 6 1 CANCELLED JAZZERCISE 0.00 0 CANCELLED IMAGE WORKSHOP 10.00 5 0 CANCELLED TYE DYE T-SHIRTS 8.00 8 1 CANCELLED iv. FAL891 FALL 1989 PARTIC MINIMUM ACTUAL ACTUAL SECTION'="='="'PROGRAM"i=-'== 'FEE"= REQUIRED REGISTERE STATUS REVENUE ACCESSORIES s's 0.00 a 5 ' =''' =' 0 CANCELLED RAISING SELF ESTEEM 18.00 12 0 CANCELLED CERAMIC WORKSHOP 0.00 0 7 CANCELLED MARKET BASKET 23.00 5 3 CANCELLED DECORATIVE BASKETS 7.50 6 0 CANCELLED MOVIN & GROOVIN 20.00 15 6 CANCELLED CROCHETING 14.50 10 1 CANCELLED DECORATIVE SWEATSHIRTS 8.50 6 1 CANCELLED CERAMICS 18.00 10 0 CANCELLED BEGINNER GYMNASTICS 32.00 12 3 CANCELLED TYE DYE TSHIRTS 8.00 8 0 CANCELLED BEGINNER GYMNASTICS 32.00 12 3 CANCELLED YOUTH CERAMICS 18.00 10 0 CANCELLED .HEARTH BASKET 23.00 5 1 CANCELLED CANDY MAKING 0.00 0 CANCELLED AEROBICS 0.00 0 7 CANCELLED .CALLIGRAPHY 25.00 13 0 CANCELLED PRETTY PUNCH 28.00 4 0 CANCELLED YOUTH CERAMICS 18.00 10 0 CANCELLED DRAWING 25.00 12 2 CANCELLED CAKE DECORATING-INT ' b.50 6 ~ 0 CANCELLED ' CAKE DECORATING-BEGINNER 6.50 ~ 6 - 0 CANCELLED -------------------------- - - --------------------------- TOTAL OF CLASSES HELD 237 316 36,937.50 WIN901 WINTER 1990 PARTIC. MINIMUM ACTUAL REVENUE SECTION PROGRAM FEE REQUIRED REGISTERED STATUS GENERATED LEISURE ARTS PAINTING W/PEYTON 35.00 8 8 280.00 BEG. WATERCOLOR 42.00 8 10 420.00 POTTERY WED AH 40.00 7 9 360.00 INTER. WATERCOLOR 42.00 8 8 336.00 POTTERY THURS PM 40.00 7 12 480.00 YOGA 17.00 8 14 238.00 POTTERY WRKSHP 15.00 0 6 90.00 GALLERY TSHIRTS 20.00 7 6 120.00 YOUTH POTTERY 28.00 4 8 224.00 JEWELRY MAKING (TEEN 10.00 9 8 80.00 MT. REGIS 6.50 CLUB 15 97.50 POTTERY TUES PM 40.00 7 12 480.00 FASHION REVUE WKSHP. 0.00 0 23 0.00 POTTERY WED PM 40.00 7 10 400.00 SAT. STUDIO ART 25.00 6 9 225.00 POTTERY SAT AM 40.00 7 4 160.00 NIGHTCLUB/SOC.DANCEI 25.00 7 25 625.00 INTRO TO CLAY 0.00 . GROUP 10 0.00 •_ YOUTH BALLET 18.00 8 10 180.00 BOW DAZZ EASTER BASK 7.00 7 8 56.00 BEG. CALLIGRAPHY 42.00 8 17 714.00 BOW DAZZ EASTER BASK 7.00 8 5 35.00 CERAMICS WED PM ,25.00 13 18 450.00 CHILDREN'S ART POTPO 25.00 7 15 375.00 CERAMICS MON PM 25.00 13 11 275.00 . BACK TO NATURE ~ 20.00 6 5 100.00 CERAMICS THURS AM 25.00 11 17 425.00 JEWELRY MAKING 15.00 8 14 210.00 ART HISTORY/CHILDREN 25.00 8 5 125.00 FANCY VALENTINES 11.00 6 4 44.00 BEG. DRAWING 42.00 8 3 126.00 BOW DAZZ EASTER BASK 7.00 8 16 112.00 • NIGHTCLUB/SOC.DANCEI 25.00 7 16 400.00 CERAMICS THURS PM 25.00 13 18 450.00 INTER.CALLIGRAPHY 42.00 8 9 378.00 TSHIRT PAINTING 11.00 8 9 99.00 QUILTING NORKSHOP 13.00 7 2 CANCELLED PASTAI PASTAI 10.00 10 5 CANCELLED DESIGNER EGGS FOR EA 8.00 8 4 CANCELLED BEG. KNITTING 35.00 8 0 CANCELLED DESIGN SEMINAR 18.00 8 1 CANCELLED COLORED PENCIL 35.00 8 3 CANCELLED a. WIN901 HINTER 1990 PARTIC. MINIMUM ACTUAL REVENUE SECTION PROGRAM FEE REQUIRED REGISTERE D STATUS GENERATED PAINT-A-POCKET SWEAT 8.00 6 2 CANCELLED CROCHET 25.00 1 1 CANCELLED PUPPETS,PUPPETS,PUPP 11.00 6 1 CANCELLED PAINT-A-POCKET SWEAT 8.00 6 0 CANCELLED WCC INTRO POTTERY 2.50 12 3 CANCELLED 3D AFTERSCHOOL ART 30.00 7 2 CANCELLED WCC TOPICS/MOIDMADE ----------------------- 0.00 12 0 CANCELLED --------- TOTAL FOR CLASSES HELD ------- --------- 360 --------- 421 ------------ ------------ 9,169.50 COMMUNITY EDUCATION SPANISH 11.00 12 8 88.00 AFTER SCH FOR KIDS (25 WK 15 15 4,500.00 DOG OBEDIENCE 25.00 8 10 250.00 FAMILY FUN BINGO 0.00 0 20 0.00 AEROBICS 15.00 12 38 570.00 ': FITNESS 15.00 12 13 195.00 • •. PRE-SCH.GYMNASTICS • 18.00 12 12 216.00 BATON-ADV.SENIOR 8.00 12 12 96.00 •• CERAMIC WORKSHOP 0.00 0 10 0.00 BATON-SENIOR 8.00 1Z 12 96.00 AEROBICS 0.00 0 15 0.00 BATON-JUNIOR 8.00 12 12 96.00 KARATE 15.00 10 10 150.00 • ' BATON-BEGINNER 8.00 12 12 96.00 AEROBICS 21.50 20 56 1,204.00 . ~ BASEBALL CARDS 0.00 0 8 0.00 AFTER SCHOOL FOR KID25 WK 15 42 12,600.00 CERAMICS 18.00 1 7 126.00 BODYSHAPING 11.00 10 17 187.00 BATON 8.00 12 12 96.00 CHESS 8.00 10 0 CANCELLED CERAMICS-DRY BRUSH 5.00 5 ~ 0 CANCELLED DECORATIVE SWEATSHIR 8.50 6 3 CANCELLED BATON 8.00 12 0 CANCELLED JAZZERCISE 0.00 CANCELLED PRE-SCHOOL GYMNASTIC 18.00 12 4 CANCELLED NATURE FOR TOTS 16.00 12 0 CANCELLED BEGINNING SIGN LANGU 0.00 5 0 CANCELLED NATURE FOR KIDS 16.00 12 0 CANCELLED DECORATIVE BASKETS 7.50 6 0 CANCELLED .~: WIN901 WINTER 1990 PARTIC. MINIMUM ACTUAL REVENUE SECTION PROGRAM FEE REQUIRED REGISTERED STATUS GENERATED CERAMICS-QUICK CRACK 5.00 5 0 CANCELLED KARATE 11.00 12 0 CANCELLED CERAMICS 19.00 9 0 CANCELLED WEIGHT LIFTING WORKS 7.50 10 1 CANCELLED BEGINNER GYMNASTICS 27.00 12 3 CANCELLED CHILDREN'S ACTIVITIE 0.00 5 0 CANCELLED DECORATIVE SWEATSHIR 7.50 6 3 CANCELLED BEGINNER GYMNASTICS 27.00 12 0 CANCELLED YOUTH ARTS & CRAFTS 18.15 8 0 CANCELLED FITNESS --------------------- 0.00 0 CANCELLED ---------- TOTAL FOR CLASSES HELD -------- --------- 352 ---------- 355 ----------------------- 20,566.00 County of Roanoke, Virginia Fl( 1990-91 Budget Work Session Potential Sources of Additional Revenue April 24, 1990 Description • User Fees • 1 ¢ Real Estate Tax Rate (Flr7 • Utility Consumer Tax 6% to 10% without water 6% to 10% with water 6% to 12% with water • Recordation Tax Increase • Fund Balance Current Balance $3,547,363 or 5.62% • 1 % Attrition Factor (Turnover) • Sale of Property -Pending • 5% Admissions Tax Amount $ 294,926 $ 271,000 $ 950,000 $1,280,000 $1,816,000 $ 157,000 Unknown $ 168,000 $ 400,000 $ 50,000 County of Roanoke Proposed Changes to the FY 1990-91 Budget Presented on April 10, 1990 April 24, 1990 Revenues Real Estate Taxes $(271,000) User Fees 96.126 Total Revenue Adjustments 174 874 Expenditures Social Services 5% Salary Increase $ 86,242 Social Services Fraud Investigator Position 8,555 Transportation Museum Capital Programs Fund 5,000 Virginia Western -Arboretum 1,660 Council of Community Services - Information and Referral Center 2,500 New Regional landfill (350,000) Match for Historical Architecture Grant 20,000 Employee Benefits 11,169 Board Contingency 40.000 Total Expenditure Adjustments _ 174 874 F PD~f lD.'~.F ~vw p z ~ ~ z a ~8 ~i~\ as SE80UICENTENN~P .d Braunrul8r~;innin4 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE ~I~ ~Mf~ICJIWir ~ 1'~ I~~ ~~~ ~~ 1979 ~,~~~~~ ~ 1989 April 26, 1990 Ms. Angie Hollenbeck President Roanoke Valley SPCA p.p. Box 11863 Roanoke, VA 24022 Dear Ms. Hollenbeck: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS RICHARD W. ROgERS. CFWRMAN CAVE gpRMG MAGISTERIAL DISTR~T STEVEN A. `MCG ~ MAGISTERIALHAI~R~" LEE B. EDDY WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON NOLUNS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. Nlq(ENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT At the April 24, 1990 meeting of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, they considered a proposal to renew the contract with the Roanoke Valley SPCA to provide animal shelter facilities to the County of Roanoke •limentardrofsthe efforts of yourenewaBoard Supervisors was very comp Y of Directors in turning around the image and successes of the shelter operation. Theffortsv to improve rthe appear nce tofnyour commendable and your e current facility are appreciated. I understand that you will begin private fund raising efforts later this year to secure cfpltor non staffomayhbecofs assistancef a new regional facility. I Y please do not hesitate to call. Wishing you continued success, I remain, Yours truly, ~~ ~~ ECH/cw cc: Board of Supervisors Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator P.O. BOX 29800 • ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 2 4018-07 9 8 <703) 772-2004' OF pOANO,I-F ti ~ A Z c~ ~ z v a 8 ~ E50 % a$ SFSQUICENTENN~P~ A Btauti~ul BcRinninl; COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE Ms. Patricia S. Collins 3523 Leffel Road Roanoke, VA 24014 Dear Ms. Collins: April 26, 1990 At their regular meeting on Tuesday, April 24, County Board of Supervisors unanimously approved Clearbrook Rescue Auxiliary for a raffle permit. be conducted on May 5, 1990. RICHARD W. ROBERS. CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT STEVEN A. MCGRAW. VICE-CHAIRMAN CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT LEE B. EDDY WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT 1990, the Roanoke the request of the The raffle will The fee has been paid and your receipt is enclosed. You may consider this letter to be your permit, and I suggest it be displayed on the premises where the raffle is to be conducted. The State Code provides that raffle and bingo permits be issued on a calendar-year basis and such permits issued will expire on December 31, 1990. This permit, however, is only valid on the date specified in your application. PLEASE READ YOUR APPLICATION CAREFULLY. YOU HAVE AGREED TO COMPLY WITH STATE AND LOCAL REGULATIONS AND FAILURE TO COMPLY MAY RESULT IN CRIMINAL PENALTIES AND REVOKING OF YOUR PERMIT. YOU MUST FILE A FINANCIAL REPORT BY NOVEMBER 1 OF EACH CALENDAR YEAR. PLEASE SUBMIT A NEW APPLICATION AT LEAST 60 DAYS PRIOR TO DATE OR DATES YOUR ORGANIZATION PLANS TO HOLD BINGO OR RAFFLES. PERMITS EXPIRE ON DECEMBER 31 OF EACH CALENDAR YEAR. If I may be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me at 772-2003. Sincerely, yna-U-~- 3J - ~~ Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisor bjh Enclosures cc: Commissioner of the Revenue Commonwealth Attorney County Treasurer All AMERICA CITY ~' ~II~'~ ~~ ~~~~~ 1979 rt~z~~ ~~ 9 ~i~ 198 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24018-0798 (703) 772-2004 F ~t AN '~' F >. z ~ 2 a OFFICE OF DIVISION SUPERINTENDENT ROANOKE COUNTY SCHOOLS 526 SOUTH COLLEGE AVENUE SALEM, VIRGINIA 24153 April 13, 1990 TO: Mrs. Mary Allen FROM: Ruth Wade Please place the enclosed resolution requesting an appropriation by the Board of Supervisors on the April 24 agenda. Dr. Eddie Kolb, director of pupil personnel services, will appear to answer any questions the board may have. of the resolution to Diane Hyatt. I am sending a copy Enclosure ~~ ~~ MEMORANDUM TO: Board of Supervisors ~~~ FROM: Paul Mahoney SUBJECT: Sign Ordinance DATE: 21 March 1990 Staff requests the Board of Supervisors to postpone the public hearing and consideration of the second reading of the proposed sign ordinance until April 24, 1990. Due to the recent unfortunate death of Terry Harrington's mother, and Mr. Harrington's necessary absence from the area, County staff was unable to meet with representatives of the sign industry in order to implement several of the proposed changes and amendments to the draft ordinance prior to the public hearing scheduled for March 27, 1990. Since the legal advertisements for this public hearing had already been published it is necessary to show this item on the Board's agenda. Postponing the public hearing and second reading of the draft ordinance until April 24, 1990, should provide staff sufficient time to met with representatives of the sign industry to address the various suggested modifications to this ordinance. Thank you for your patience and consideration. PMM/sp OF POAN ~.~ ti 9 Z ~ 2 J a 18 Eso 88 SFSQUICEN7ENN~P~ A BcautifulBcginning COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: (~nunt~ of ~nttnnk~ MEMORANDUM D. Keith Cook, Director of Human Resources Mary H. Allen Clerk to the Board March 7, 1990 Employee of the Year Award Service Awards ILLl~11MERIG CITY 1'II'~ 1979 1989 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS RICHARD W. ROBERS. CHAIRMAN GVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT STEVEN A. MCGRAW. VICE-CHAIRMAN GTAWBA MAGISTERAL DISTRICT LEE B. EDDY WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRCT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT Confirming our conversation with Elmer Hodge at staff meeting on Tuesday, March 6th, I have tentatively scheduled the Employee of the Year Awards for the April 10th Board of Supervisors meeting and the Service Awards recognition for the April 24th Board of Supervisors meeting. As in the past, I assume you want the Employee of the Year Award as the first item on the agenda. The Service Awards are usually scheduled for the last item so that a reception honoring the employees may be held. Mr. Hodge also advised me that he would like to have special recognition on April 24th to those l0 long-service employees who were featured in The County Signal. Maybe you and I can get together in early April and come up with suitable recognition. CC: Kathy Claytor Elmer C. Hodge P.O. BOX 29800 • ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24018-0798 (703) 772-2004 APRIL 24TH MEETING (AS OF 4/10/90 NEW BUSINESS ~ ROANOKE SOAPBOX DERBY REQUEST TO USE WALROND PARK ?~'~ - BONSACK FIRE STATION CONTRACT /- PUBLIC SAFETY TRAINING CENTER - REQUEST FROM MT. PLEASANT TO PURCHASE FIRE TRUCK ~t,;;r.,;,!~-~"~ / - UPDATE ON LIBRARY AUTOMATION SYSTEM 4' / - 2 SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES ...- .~ - FUNDING METHODOLOGY FOR SPRING HOLLOW RESERVOIR ~ .~`"`""'°~'~ ~"~~~'~-~ SPECIAL RESOLUTIONS, PROCCLAMATIONS AND AWARDS ~/- RETIREMENT RESOLUTION - JACK COUNCIL RESOLUTION OF CONGRATULATIONS - GREEN VALLEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 25TH ANNIVERSARY - RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION TO ELEANOR KNOTT, GR. VALLEY SCHOOL ~- - PROCLAMATION - NATIONAL SECRETARIES WEEK ~'" - SERVICE AWARDS (AT 4:00 P.M.) WITH RECEPTION FOLLOWING (over 100 people will be receiving awards) PUBLIC HEARINGS - SIGN ORDINANCE - 4 REZONINGS ~ - PUBLIC HEARING ON THE BUDGET BUDGET WORK SESSION - MARKET SURVEY RESULTS - REPORT FROM COMP BOARD ON SHERIFF'S DEPT. SALARIES - LOCAL FUNDING FOR SOCIAL SERVICE EMPLOYEES - S~2ING HOLLOW RESERVOIR FUNDING (?) ~~ 1 C . _ _ s ,~ ~._.~.~, ACTIVE MEMBERS JUDY KELLEY, PRESIDENT 4426 KEEFER RD ROANOKE, VA 24014 SALLY A. HYPES, VICE PRESIDENT 5 3 6 8 AMANDA LA1~tE ROANOKE, VA $~3~~~X 24014 PATRICIA COLLINS, SECxTREASURER 3523 LEFFEL RD ROANOKE, VA 24014 NANCY & ROGER SWEENEY 5219 LEWIS RD ROANOKE, VA 24014 CAROLYN & RONNIE BECKNER 3147 GARDEN CITY BLVD ROANOKE, VA 24014 CAROLYN ZOOK 3319D CIRCLEBRROK DR ROANOKE, VA 24016 GLORIA MILLER 4 418 BUC'~' MTN RD ROANOKE, VA 24014 SALLY & ROBERT PATE 6607 B. INDIAN GRAVE RD BOONES MILLE, VA 24065 BUTCH REIRSON 5565 INDIAN GRAVE RD ROANOKE, VA 24014 BY - LAWS OF THE CONSTITUTION CLEARBROOK RESCUE SQUAD ARTICLE I Qualification of Senior Members A, The applicant shall be of the age of eighteen (18) and hold, or be currently enrolled in Emergency Medical Technician Card, and/or any other qualifications required by the Commonwealth of Virginia. B. Application for membership shall consist of a brief application form, to be drawn up by the squad, stating name, address, age, social security number, three (3) references, and training qualifications. This application will be turned over to the membership committee for investigation. Recommendations of the membership committee, regarding this application will be presented to the squad at the next month's business meeting, C. Upon majority vote by secret ballot of members present, the applicant shall become a probationary member for a period of 180 days, during which time he/she shall become familiar with the squads equipment, training program, and complete such training as mentioned in section A. D. The applicant must complete a written test given be the training and/or equipment officer on the rescue equipment. E, Upon completion of the 180 day period, the membership committee shall report to the squad on the applicant and present the recommenda- tions of the membership committee. F. Upon approval of the applicant by the squad, it will be the duty of the Second Sergeant to issue equipment. G. No probationary member shall operate any squad vehicle on any public street or highway, except while under the supervision of the duty officer. Unless okayed by the driving committee. H, State, County and insurance regulations will be met by all members in regard to operating squad vehicles at all times, ARTICLE II Qualification of Junior Members P.. Junior members will hold a current EMT card or be enroled in an EMT class, and/or have any other qualifications required by the .. Commonwealth of Virginia. B, Age limits for Junior members is fifteen (15) through eighteen (18) years of age if desired. C. All Junior members shall maintain at least a eighty percent (80) average in school. Page 7 D. Junior members shall come under the supervision of the Junior Squad Advisor. Also the Junior and Senior crew officers. E. When answering calls, Junior members shall be under the supervision of a Senior member. F. All Junior members shall be considered as Senior members for squad functions and personal equipment. G. lhassistsinrall emergencyhcareeproceduresr~andetraffic control, shal as directed. H. Junior members shall apply and be approved under the same reg- ulations as Senior members. I. State, County, Insurance laws, and regulations shall govern the operation of vehicles by Junior members. J. Disciplinary action of Junior members will be handled by the Junior Squad Advisor, Executive Committee, or the Membership Committee, in that order. ARTICLE III Rules for Probationary Members A. These members will not have a vote in the conducting of squad business. B. Foregoing Articles, where applicable, will apply to these members. C. Dismissal of these members shall follow the same rules as for. regular members. ARTICLE IV Member's Certifications A. Each member shall keep up his/her certifications. B. If a member lets his/her certifications run out, then that member will be put on probation until such a time as the certification is renewed. C. All rules of probationary members will be effective for these members as well. ARTICLE V Drivers A. A driver must be the minimum age of twentyone (21). B. Drivers must hold a current Virginia drivers license, an EVOC card ~/or a Defensive Driving Card. The driver must abide by Article I, Section 1. Page 8 ' C. The driver must be. approved by~the Driving Committee. ARTICLE VI Qualification of Officers A. The prospective officer must be a good standing member for at ~- least 1 year. B. The prospective officer must hold all certifications. C. The prospective officer may not be an Honorary, associate or an Inactive Life member. ARTICLE VII Women's Auxiliary A.Woman'SOnsxoflthe RescuesSquadl butftheytmusttabadenbyatheaSquad~sls or functi rules and regulations. B.All officers and members of the auxiliary shall be elected and governed by the auxiliary. C.All other rules and regulations of the auxiliary for membership and training shall be governed by the auxiliary. D.:'he Squad will appoint one person to represent the Squad at the auxiliary meetings. ARTICLE VIII Meetings and drill s ~ A.Regular business meetings shall be held on the first Monday of each month, from 7:30 p.m. until all business has been covered. This is to be followed at all times unless a matter of urgent business arises requiring immediate action by the squad. to such cases, the Captain may call a special business meeting. ~ 1. There will be an Executive Committee meeting at 7:00 pm before the business meeting. 2.,/rhe order of business at the regular business meeting shall be: /Call to order p~'rayer by Chaplain /Moll Call eading of Minutes from Last Meeting eading of Treasurer's Report Report from Executive Committee Unifinished Business Reports of Committees New Business Elections when Applicable Remarks Adjourment B. The Training Officer will schedule training meetings as he deems necessary for the benefit of the crew. These training meetings are to be held the second Monday of each month starting at 7:30 pm. Page 9 C. Arty member being absent from airy meetings; be it business, training, • or assigned duty; three (3) times. in succession in a 90 day period without being excused by the 'presiding officer, shall be contacted by ' the membership committee to determine the reason for absence. D. Any members desiring to be absent from drills more than three (3) ~ times consecutively, in order to teach classes or for any other reason shall be required to appear before the squad for permission to be absent If one has to be absent for a meeting, that person must contact the 1st Sergeant at least one hour before the meeting is to begin. E. Any member wishing to leave a drill early must obtain permission from the presiding officer. ARTICLE IX Conduct and General Rules of Members A.Any individual or small groups of members attempting to cause obstention between the presiding rescue officers and the crew shall be brought up on charges and may face dismissal proceedings. B.A squad member sha13 at all times conduct theirself in such a manner as to demand the respect of the squad officers and public in general. C.A squad member shall not take part in any activity of the squad while under the influence of intoxicants of any kind, partically or completely. And shall not be on any of the squad grounds or rolling equipment while under the influence. D.A squad member shall not permit the use of his badge or any other indentification by any non member to use the same himself in any way in violation of these by-laws or in any manner embarrasing to the squad. ~ E.The highest medically certified member on the scene shall be responsible for directing what emergency care shall be administered. The Senior squad officer present shall be responsible overall. All additional members arrivi~ on the scene shall report to the Senior officer as soon as possible. F.When answering a call to another city, county, or other squad area, the following rules will be carried out: 1. In no event shall more equipment and personnel be taken on calls to other jurisdictions than is deemed necessary to handle the call involved. In no event shall the safety of our community be jeopardized. 2. In any event when making a lengthy run, permission must be secured frcm the Captain or the designee. G. Any member willfully destroying,~defacirig, or misusing equipment or other property of the squad shall be brought before the Executive Committee. If charges are correct, they may be asked for the amount of monies to repair or replace the same or it may be handled under ARticle XI of the by-laws. H. Keys, badges, and other identification, equipment and clothing shall at all times remain the property of the squad and any member leaving the squad for any reason shall immediately turn in the same to the 2nd Sergeant. .` Page 10 I. A member •shall at all times obsE•rve city, state, county traffic • regulations when answering calls in a private vehicle. J. The equipment of the squad shall be used for: 1. By members in taking care of emergencies. 2. Equipment is not to be used for the benefit or conveniece of a private ~~ individual when an emergency or need for a squad does exist. K. The equipment will be stored in the vehicles in a marked and designated place and will not be moved for storage unless the squad is notified of this move by the Second Lieutenatn. The equipment will not be moved from the vehicle to be placed in another vehicle without permission of the Second Lieutenant. L. The duty officer on a call is responsible for replacement of••vehicle in proper condition or notification of problems if any to the Second Lieutenant or Captain. M. Duty leaders shall be appointed by the Executive Committee. They • shall have at least one year of service in the squad. They must be familiar with the territory, units, equipment of all types on units, and procedures of handling all emergency calls. N. All equipment to be disposed of shall be offered to the crew members before it is soldor destroyed. 0. All probationary members and Active members shall pull juty as set by the Executive Committee. P. No unit will go out on a call unless there are two qualified crew- members on the unit. These being one (1) driver and one (1) EMT. .\ Q. Stand bys and transports will be approved by the Captain. ARTICLE X Elections and Voting ~ A. All balloting and voting shall be done by a majority vote of the members present, except as may be noted elsewhere in the Constitution and by-laws. A majority of all active members shall constitute a gourum to transact any business that may legally come before the squad at any regular or special meeting. B. Elections will be held by secret ballot when electing officers and to be conducted under new business at the first business meeting in December. C. Elections or acceptance of new members will be held by secret balloting. ARTICLE XI Disciplinary Action of Members A.Disciplinary action for dismissal of members shall be done by secret ballot at a regular business meeting of squad members. A three/fourths vote of the members present shall be required for disciplinary action. Page 11 B. A disciplinary action charge Mouth against any member must be placed within 24 hours of the said incident. It must be in written form and brought before the Executive Committee. The secretary's records will contain the orginial written form of disciplinary action. The charged member will be given every chance to defend themselves. C.The person will be suspended from all squad activities until such a time that the squad meets to discuss whatever action should be taken in relation to the said charge. Action shall be a minimum of 30 days sus- pension or a maximum of ARTICLE XII Committes is deemed necessary to the we ar The executive committee may suspend members but dismissal mutt be by a squad vote. A. Executive There shall be an executive committee consisting of all line officers and crew secretary. The executive committee shall meet befo_•e the business meeting, to discuss important business that will be brought before the business meeting. The Captain shall call a meeting of this executive committee, when it if a of the squad. B. Training Th~:re shall ba a training committee consisting of the training officer as chairman, thall membersbtraining currenteandlup totdateaasraining schedule so as to keep per state requirements. C. Finance '~ There shall be a finance committe consisting of the finance officer as chairman~makeerecommendationsTas tomthetsquadlondsuchSSThelfinanceial matters and committee will also do a budget. D. Equipment There shall be a equipment committee consisting of the Second Lieutenan- and Second Sergeant as chairmen and three (3) members. This committee shall recommend to the squad on purchase of new equipment, repairing, and maintain: present equipment. E. Membership There shall be a membership committee consisting of the First Sergeant as chairman and three members. This committee's duties are to accept and investigate new applications, keep attendance records, they will conduct all elections. Page 12 . F. Grievance committee shal consist of three members of the crew. Shall accept all grievances in writting review the grievance and bring back a recommendation of action to the executive committee. G. Life Membership Responsibility of the membership committee. H. Any other committees deemed necessary by the Captain. ARTICLE XIII Amendments Any propose amendment or alteration of these by-laws must be submitted in writing at any regular business meeting of the squad. At the discretion of the Captain, either of the following actions may be taken on the proposed amendments or alterations: 1. Refer the amendment or alteration to the squad for a discussion and vote, providing a forum of members are present. A two/thirds majority vote shall be required for the amendment of alteration. 2. Reger the amendment or alteration to a special committee appointed by the Captain for a report thirty days hence. If a vote is indicated at the next business meeting of the squad, action under section 1 shall be followed. 3. If sections 1 and 2 fall, any member has the priviledge of calling a crew vote after he has read the change before the squad. ARTICLE XIV Adoption Adoption of these By-Laws will be by a two/thirds majority vote of members present and effective thirty days from the date of adoption. Adopted Sept. 8, 1986 Page 13 FROM THE MINUTES OF THE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA MEETING IN REGULAR SESSION AT 7 P.M. ON APRIL 12, 1990 IN THE BOARD ROOM OF THE SCHOOL ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, SALEM, VIRGINIA. RESOLUTION REQUESTING AN APPROPRIATION TO THE FEDERAL PROGRAMS FUND FOR THE SCHOOL YEAR 1989-90 PRESCHOOL ALLOCATIONS WHEREAS, notification was received on March 22, 1990 regarding the award of federal special education preschool allocation funds for the period July 1, 1989 through September 30, 1990, and WHEREAS, Roanoke County Schools' allocation is $25,029 of which $3,554 was budgeted for the 1989-90 school year; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the County School Board of Roanoke County, on motion of Charlsie S. Pafford and duly seconded, that an appropriation of $21,475 is being requested to the Federal Programs Fund for materials, equipment, and summer school instruction for the preschool program. Adopted on the following recorded vote: AYES: Paul G. Black, Maurice L. Mitchell, Charlsie S. Pafford, Barbara B. Chewning, Frank E. Thomas NAYS: None TESTE•- i~ c: Mrs. Diane Hyatt N -~ o n Qv oro r•~ o nce rt~ •A vo w a~ w~ v N _<~ wa~tn• ~ ~ ~.- -* o--- m o -- rte -- v voro ~~ rt v -- ~ o+ o rt r• 0 -+, Q D v rr d U ~ .P v O m N ~~ n~ 0 -~ x C C7 W w 3 -ai 7 r• ~ "~ O~ 0 's 0 0 ~ rD n v~ O N O ~ v ' 3 0 `C f rp SU N v , ~ 0 F+• -h N C I .a ? N ? r• v 0 -+. ~ v r• tv N rt 0 r -~ n ~ r C 0 rD rD ~ o- N~ ~ 7 N a~ v~~ c v o rt -~ m ~ • ~ r+ ? D ~ ~ N v m ~ a~ o ~ n O N N !~ ~ ~ N ~ m ~c ~, N 7 n rt rD ~~ U rD a 0 -+. Q 0 ~ C 9 u <~ 9u -~ 0 7~ r+ rt " rD ~ fD N r• -fi r• N -fi rt ~ rt rD rr ~ rr -~ v ~D rf {L 0 !y 5 N r• r~--• f 7 N a 0 0 ~ r~a 7 r• N v ' Q~r•v r•K ~-'n.N ~i,rt~0 n 0 r• rt N rt -fi r• > 4] > ~ N v ~ S O< x N r• ~ rD N G rt v tD 7 rt -~+ rt 0 N ? n rt 0 N v r• ~ rt ~ N r• rD G N =~ r• r• n r• O 7 0 0 0 ? v N ~D r• r+ x iD 0 0 Cl C ~ t0 tD N r r*0 0 7 0 r• 0 £ rtv ~ 0 07 aa~ £ ~ t0 I rr fp 7 i fp v ~ N r• fp r1 rr N 7 N• 7 N ~ n m N O rt~ O N a[n rto ~ ~ ~ v v D rfcn ~~cn ~ .o N? -~ o 0 -+, O n ro v ~ n v ~c C N ' O rt N ~D N, r~ < C r•~ 0~rt~ 0? N x r• ~ ~ (T ~ ~ v O -~ rtr• n ~ ~a 0 ~ 0 r• 7 U O N rD ~ £ ~ rD ~ x £ ~, ~ ~ ~ 'O '~ ~ r• r• ~ v 0 rp t7' !_ 'i rD r• x N ~ UI r-+ C ~D rt 0 N U N 'S a 0 ~ v ~ rt v ~~ --•~ Coro rt N o-~ cm Qv >>a rt rp v> 0 > 'S v rr r• n -fi w• ~ ~ ~ ~-. - n ~, v~ ' Q O O 0 ~o rD ~ W A N ~~+ m rr SV ~ ro ~ rt~ oo v fp rt n~ ' rD N ' r• N~ N r• N N rD n ~ rD ~- v ~ -~ v rD ~. - fi 0< K 7 N ? O d ~ r• 0 r• U O O N r~ N~ !_ ~D N N v ~-' rp ~O ~ t0 .~ 7 rt ~ O N ~ 7 K d > > SI+ r• 0 r• N fp N 0 N r ~ ~ < "S rt d r~ ~ N 7 , 0 v `D n N ,~ rD ''' tD 0 7 N N N r• ~c ~. < O v ~ U tD ~ d ~ rD 0 0~ v ~ m ~ ~ n ~c ~ D n ~ ~ = n < to rt ~ ~ ~ ~ n ' ' -* O O v tp v 0 tU 9u ~ O v N 'S O v C 0 ~D ~ tp 7 0 '' C o ~ ~0 O -++ < r rt '~ n ~ x 0 v ' x ~-. O r• -~ rD ~ ~ ~ ~ N n a C O ~c r• ~ r• 7 rtN 0 ~ r• ~ r+? v ~ r• N ~ r•0 -i, 0 r+ U U C N =0 •AO 0 rt -~ a r• ~ rp Q ~ rD ~ C rD ~• n ~ £ s= O - rt v ~ rD rD rt rt < ~ 9 ~ rf v O N N rt U -•+, ~ 0 v ~ C 9u ~ rt ~ ~ r0 7 r• 7 v n O N = r• v rD ~0 e ~ K 'S 7~ d r• 0 rt rp rt ~ rt ~D r• v N rD v ID rt x C v v O tp W >> D ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 r• ~ 0 ~ 7 0 ~ rt N rt U ~-' Cal a 's r+ ~ ~ ~. N -* < v -~, U ~ n rt fp r• ~D ~ ~ '1 !L N~ B ~D rt 0 K v ~ ~p ~--• m x o ' m o n o r• m ~, ~+~ ~. N o n -~, x 0 0 r N r• a. ~ .P S v N r~ 0 '~ rt 7 ~• rt = 'S -~, < ~D -h t+• ~G 0 fi 0 N• 0 ~ ? v N r• £ O v 0 rr "5 ~O -•i, ~D < U v v -~, 7 to N N r• ~ v ~D `G ~ r• ~ 0 U v N rD r• ~.- N O N rh r* ~ ~ o ' ~~ v ...o mN o r• c o- fi rom a~~-~v 'fl N 0 d O ~ N N O 7 ~ -fi N r• O -~ rp N v ~ O N• 7 -1, rF N ID ~O I N ~ rt r• v =n 7 N O r+ r• O r~ N W U 7 = r• 0 ~ tD a ~ 0 ~O tv rD O N N j N N ~ 7 N v C t D v O. N rt rt rt ~ m o r• rt ~ D ~D ~ "~ D tp ~ 'S D tp iO Z 0 O ~~ ~ n-~ n-~ n~ ~ n -~ fD N ~m ~rtDn ~m ? ~ Om c ~ a 3 a ~ a v ° ~ a ro 0 rr ro 7 r+ m 7 rt ~ ~ ~ "~ 0 ~ + ~* ~ ao ao ao ro N ` a 0 0 v rtN v rtN v rtN ro ~ '~' r• r. 0 ~0 F.. ~,,, O i0 ~,,• H.• 0 ~ rt N ~' ~' Z 0 7 7 7 >> 0 ~0 tD N N > > ~ r > r• > r• > r• fi a a a > a r a N N ~ ~ fi rt rt rt N rt ~• ~ .. ~ ~ ~ __ ~ ~ n O m 'S 'i -1, r mm-~r N ~ ~D -- r• C rp dr•N 3 N ~ r+ 0 7 fp Qi 7 rr a ~ C r• a ~ ~+ r• r• rp ~ 7 7 7 ~a ~ N I o N r+ 0 r• ~ rD ~] ~ N ~ N N 3WCOWN r I I I l~ o r W N r 3 .. ~ D I W N r ~-• N O O O~ 0 OOOtp £ ~ !Z 3 Q I O' UI ~ ~ .. N ~ 7 9u W rD x O N O N 3 I W r• fi fri 0 ~ 'i N ~ rp r• N N 7 r• r• ~ a ~o ~+ mom rt '~ ~ N• rD 0 ~u ~ ~ ~ C 0 N• ~ N "5 N 0 -D ~ 0 ~ rt rD N I N ~ fi 'i N D N N• 7 N ~D `c ~~ ~ a ~+ ~D 9~ ~ ~ ~~ rt~N r• 0 v f o m -~ a N -1, 0 r• -5 7 ~ N r~ r~ N N fi a r• 'S D m ~n n -~ ~ m ~ a rD ~ rt ao v r+ N r• r• 0 ~ r~ a N rr y 0' Z 0 0 N N• ~ 0 ~ rU x N r• N ~ N .a ft U ro 0 SU ~0 (nl W W N f 9r N N N N d ~' r• r. r• r• > > > > C N N N N~ N SU r• r• r• r• r~ x 7 7 ~ ~ ~ r• fp ~ N 30DtI7tS70 N i I I f ~ r(~•INr 3 I N A+ 0 Z ~ -++ 0 0 N ~ £ r• SL rp ~ x d 7 r• N ~ 0 v ~ Q' O C ~ N N• r+ ~ ? N rD N N 7 0 f ~ v o- N N 3UDCTD I I 0 ~ r r N r• 0 ~f 3tdrU ~ N N N ~ w ti tD 3W"~ ~ I I ~D ~+ WW•• x .. .. ~, w cn c O O ~ 0o N N N U ~ .o rD -~ ~~ rt rr WGI(.~IND N N N N ~ r• r• r• N~ 9u ~O~tO~A x ~ 7 > > r~ N N N N ~ C >>>> 0 3 CJU tx1 CD -+, r(,JNr 3 I N 3 I W N N -++ ~ 0 N ~ 0 v Z fi O O N r D !v 9u -ti r+ ~ 0 rt ~ N 0 rt r~ fp r ~ -~, ~ O r• K rp 0 Ut 7 U N ~ O 0 N rt • -h v 'S SL rt ~ 0 ~ ~ ~• a ~D r~ rr r• 7 rt O N• NJ.] i CL N N N•U TI SU ~D ~ fp "5 N ~ fi ~ tOp '~ 7'N•N ~-• 9~ rD fi rt 0 rt rt SU rtN•C7rp ~ ooaa 7 C r• 7 O 7 0 rt 7 t0 ~ ~ ~• SL N rt 7 r• ~ r ~c ~ N O ~ O ~ N •0 fi 0 N• 'S r ~ 7 tp O ~O ~ O rr C ? N r• N I-•• ~ ~ ~O N r• N~a~ v N r• ~~• -~~ 0 0 C N "S ~ ~'.' (!~ r+ ~ -~ ro 0 N N ~ N N rr 'D r~ SL ~ !L ~ ~ 0 rD v a rt i r• 0 n N'U ~+a r•0 V ~ ~ 0 0 N -++ U ~ < r+ D I D tD N r• '~ I ~ ~ ~ drr•r-~ ~••r N r•rD~ n N 0 a N a r+v ~ f rt N N 7 r• N r•~ 0 O d N 7 < 7 O-~h~N tp ~~ mmNo -~ r• < o ~ n, -i+ 0 rr N 0 -++ rr r• N 0 r~ N r• 0 7 r~~0 r~~ ~-• N U 0 N N 0 ~ v ~ < r• D r• SU ~D 0 rr O ~ rr • r• 0 ~ -+, 0 'S 'S >>o a m < fp ~-• K r• rt fp N rD ¢] G7 N• -~vroo ~ ~ ~ ~ ~•r~r~ ~fi,v ro~vm a. ~~ •a N I ~ 0 0 O ~ n n ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ > o j r• ~ ~ r. ~ O O N rD wa~cn• ~a o ~+ r rh 3 W W r. B ~, ~0 7 Ui ~' O N N f~ ~. v~o ~ '1 0 7 ~ ~+rt~~ rta ro ~ ~~ n r~ O 7 0 7 aa~t° r. fD 7 r. ~ !L 7 I n fD ~ ~ N ID t0 r. 0 ~ 7 9 tp B N ~+ N fp 7 > > a a,+C a !y N rt r+ rh r. r. ~ 0 < K 7 fp N N •A ~ SL C7 ~ fD ~ 0 ao a~ ~ B ~ r+ o~a~ 7 7 D vas a ~a~.a ly~0~. -n r. ~o ~ rt 0 ~. O N rt fi 1 !L ~ a~,-~a r~ ~ -h rr ~ N 0 ~ N n tD r~ N C rr N 0 -a Z fD ~D 0 r+ N~ !y rr N• 0 7 Ui r• 0 N -i, UI Ui ~ SU '~ ~ U r 'S N 'i 'S Clf 9r rt r. r C 0 U rt r ' ~ py ~ W ~ N W a C7 !A ~ ~ ID ib ~D 0 ~ - ? 7 .A -+~ ~ N~ W N I ~D I !ti N \ d 0 fi - rr !L n ~-- --, 0 UI -- ~ W -s N r* ... ~ fi B W Ut -~,0 N N• r•O 0 C O n N•0 O -fi -~~ , s=mul ' a-~ -~oa~ m~u~ m -~, O oro~u, N ~• \0 N• N ~, I U 0 rp ~ O UI N ~•-. rt N N d UI -r• r• C fD a rt rt UI N• r. N 't UI 7 ~D 0 0 •• ~D 1 O N U ft's 'S rr ~ C ~D ~ ' 7 K .-~ r d • rF (•!1 rt N O Cl~ 0 N. d f7 0 '0 D ~ «-J n rt S rr SU 7• v ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 O ~ ~ 0 7 ~ ~ ~D ~ SL rr (p tp ? 0 0 ~ ~' ~ 7 •~ UI r+ r• a rt N r. vn rt fp -firo7n UI ~O 0 NN•~ 0 L . o ~ r o a+r t~ ~ ro r+- o o r•a c ! a -* -fi - SU r+ !L fp 7 a~ ~ Im o ~ D 00 ~-+,~••a, 0 r+ 0 rr ~,n O 7 0 w 7 ~ N 7 0 -+, D , ~ ~' `~ ~ ~ 7 ~, 7 N 0 SU 7 I 7 n rD -o 'S ~ -,, -s d 'S fp ul ~ -~ -I r• r• ~D ? ~ D r m -~, od ~ ~ u~ N < 0 u] a < SU ~ r• • ~ n-~ 0 I 0 I 0 W 0 N fp fp N• n ~ to ~• ~ ~ "S 7 N ~D rr to ~ r•N r ~ O~ r• 7 N f O N O r N U1 •r UI ~ ~D rtN N ~D N• ~ rr N v r•~ -~, -ti p 7 ~ f ro ~ a o m ~, ~, rt m 7 ~D ~ O ~s 7 7 a v ~ 7nfia corn -~ -~ -~ul-~N arty awul ~ 0 O U1 rtrrrp r • ~D 0 !ti ~, 7 ~ ~, I '~ . 0 ~ 0 ~ rh rt r'h F. ~ 7 7 r,r,~ 0 ~D !L !U d r• r. ~O N OJ rt SU r+ 7 fp n ' ~ rr ~ n ~ n+ C 0 n+ ~n ~ N N ~ u~ v o fi oo~ 7 a v ~ 7a ro ro -~ ro I , m uoi rGO m r~o -~ ~ 1 ~ ~D -~ ~ ~ ~ ~• N r• t0 a n to ~ 0 su s>, ~ C y o oo a -~ - •~, m -,, m •A ~ !y [~ ~'~~ ! ~*~ ~ a ~ t a r<o o l o l oWON \rp 7 p NnaG rtSU ~ ' 0 ~ ~ 0 rtQ. 0 NO r \3 'ZIr+ U ~ 0 7 s "5 N O N• ~ rr rp > n > r• r~ rD N t -a, -~, O I D a r ~• 7 r• N ~ 0? ~~ o ~n ~O N -~ N -~ u- 0 D 0 .O ~ a ~. a Qr 1' 7 F+ ~ 7 ~0~ -h !L 7 7 7 7 t ~ -h F+~ ~O 7 n W 7 CO ~ ~, r ~D rr -~, rr -~, rr 0 N, N \ IA N O [ ~p SD iD ~ l0 ~ O Ill t'h P'h W D N N `~ N N '~ !L l N A UI 0 7 ~ N ~' 7 N n rD z afi~~.z o ~ ~ o ~~o rn~ o o~o r ~ N r• d ' n~ N n . nx ~cn n oro 0 ~ a cm~a~ a ro fi a ~ ~' ~ ro ~ N~~•-~7 ~ ~a ry. N ~D N• 7 K ~ ~ ~ rt ro o v a ro ro a o 0 7 N tp I ~. ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ - 0 ro ~mm fp ~ fD ~' rh 0 ~ rr rt rr N 9+ r• O N ~' "~ ~ 0 ,~ ~ 0 3 Z 1 ~ •,yy y~~.~~N~T~i ~~r ~.M~ t+ ~ ~" i .f73 _ - ~ r . . y t. ~~ ~p i 2' 7' r +/~'y c1~ 7 ~- . a ,~.. , y / y ~ ••t •' ( J : Q g RRr n r: K w a a '" < a ~ ~ R wp R ~ ~ ~ ~ s" m~ a a ~ o a o o b w K TKO Ka - - - - ~ a+~ r i -X-~a ~ ~~ ~+ r a a rs ~ K a a a ~'R o y ~ 8• . . a M ~ ~ M •$~' ~' ~w ~~ tR s • ~ --~ ~ o o A a MM rs MFOf K t d a ~O < a b' -- ~7{ ~s ~~• K R AaA ¢ ~'~ ~ a+ ~ W r{{ r W •t O O l • w r O C o O a a • M m m RR ~ a Z7'NOrR7F+ b•mM• 1tOrgOR3• OdlttlO'O• K s RJo- Go~40 CXO~ G1-•aOmN OOaaO•N IpA K aOmKt7~ aA0 a--•XRKt7~ -+OXXRKtr 'Cio O-f r O a 0 F+a rasRa O O R -~ +a g R ~~gH~R-+a 0~i eeo o •Q o a a t M K 0 0 ~ to~ w~ c i r o ire m A ~ 0~ ~ ~ ~ 0~ ~ K A a M M a M+ R • d, M R • M • A w~ M RR R OM• ~ a ~X MR a O X MR le l0 O P p p ~ ORO ~ O aOM O ovc2a O ~ ~RRm O ~' 'Tt~ <O alt ~ X M K A O m rs a iiR a s r~ ~a - -• O~~Or~ A wR M o o ~ a . OM RO M h a s a rs -r t~'~ aMl+ ~ ~~ qq ROJ~ I~OOK~ ` SMM•OK~ `~ m ~ O K ~~a Ra a o ~ s ~ a o : !s O a 0 4 '0 O uR O ~ 1+ M ~t3 J a O•' a 1+ O ~t3 O a Rts ~ R• R• K ~ R O MMO- i C~ aRKOp d~ ROp 1~ Y w . R .• ~ ~ x rs ~+ ¢ ~ m R w -• ~ R OD a rO N O pg •~ ~~ c' O a ~ i ctu O.1P O G iaaoa -+~ a soa soa ~~ a • ? a K R a V a~a crMa ~ K w O O ~ l A K V1 0 A Vl ~ A O R A a ~taM am as o Rm~• ~m aA ~ • rK O O r~ R X O ~ Rm b~ ~4~ Rb O ~ m NIC7 °w m ~'IW A~^^ ~' »I~ ~ O . m Q' ~ 7 d N f7 O N ,j y ,,,,• A •+o~~O m» ~ m ' ~'d ~ X~ .p~ d... , h - ~ ~ z L 3 ~9 _oA ?-'w~~ranN N N . 7C' ~ 7~ 3 . N 3 ~~ O A A A ~ ~ 1n O ~ 3 ~ 3 _ (p u~i m ~ (e N fE ~ N ~ N x o 3 o ~c ~ ~~ a m 3~ .0 ~~ 3 m ^~ ~ ~ ~ A o m c a, ,,., N YI . ~ 3 ~ v N ~ =o 7 ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ A ~ 7 w N ~ ; ~ F ~ c0 tC ~ ~ ~ ~ n S ~ m ~ . N !p m~ ~ ~ ~ C A m N ~ , ~ ~ `~ l9 S Z .., ~ 3 ~ - o m n -w< 3 ?omm ~ Z O N ~ g ~ ~ i ~ m O ~ ~~~ s ~ !C N O' O A ~ tp ~ N A o e 3 ~ ,~ i w u - ~ m » . j .. l~i 0 !+ R O M A R s s r r w a 1+ O O to ~ as ~< N ~o a~ ~ N 1 ~ ~ W O C M N a M ~ A * ~ b d vlo ~nx ~ xx dN K ~~~ ~~ w m ~ rM ~ ~ ~~ ~ • ~ ~ ~ ~ 0- ~ ~T F~{ b O K a ri fs ~ R a M+ ¢ w a 0 0~ O Y ~' x oo al o0 oil M R3 A ~O r v 7 F V I r O 1 1 1 1 a K m Co a ao¢rN Nr rwN-+ E1 O K O \ \ N N N ~ FK^~~-AtiR WA ~ ~AAw p OE+OI ~t M G F' M W¢ RI N VI V1 V1 a m g h YY1I'tfpt\ R \ ~ A .~I.o ~ m le cf~ OA~ipA F+~ O NAAIaT w MM O ¢~W xM m O ~ a A -~" N ~i ~ mArl M • a ~ Q ~' ~ A m p ct W ra • • w 'fir x Oo bo 0o x Co O Co m ~ O '~ r V r 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 p O • m h+ -~+wNr -+wNr ~ K ctK VI A 0 \ N N N \ M N M rA tp ~AwN x1 NNr p G O'+d2 1+• ¢ N NVINIVI a a O• ~R F- xlp+~-a•~-a+- x1iMM (n O X MK g• ~ I~QO~Q 1 a-mm 1 sog- at wO 0 o wm m ar w a m R 1 M a O N A ~ w F~ a ~I a O 1~ -~ 01 'C ~ C K ~ n w w cat ~ D~ w • ct a M O ct W • m H 3C~ xodoow O al w P I r 1 1 1 1 a p p • ~O ~\• N`• O ~ p ~ xl Q NwwN ~ A Opt a a a m -+~ 9C r r w O O trl A x0 w~~~ n A A Ito \•aaa N W \ a wl ~Q w ~ \ a ~ C ~ ~ N ~ ~ o ~~ Or A fP N m A d N d 3 A a m a oD 3 p 3 >;' ~a ~- .., ~ O a t 0 ~' -~ O N V, g f Sd ~~ F+ K -•~ O O M ~ Cl n~ 7 p~ P ~~ y~ y m rt s d b ~ ~ e~ Y 'C yr ~• a r O O 1/1 ,ZI O A 7 ~ N ~ O a~ C N Z~ O C ~ N .~ 7 O !C d W ~ a ~ ~ no o~ C q 7 ~ d 7 a ~~ L G S- ~ f l ~ r s~` 1 i_~ ~ r 1. ..,,cr~~ ~. a~ Y~.. • , i V t • '~_ ~'-' t ~ `, '~' ' s f ~~+ ~ z ~` d ~; ,. `i ~~~ ~ ;ZnF r ._ .. 1.~~ {'~,~ .fit 1.af.{. ~..: ~, F ~~ ~ r ~o ~~ w ~ ~~ ~~ ~ p OK FIK O la+ oR R O~ 1w+~ V ~ }! ~ ~ Y 1. ~ O , M ~ ~_4" M . ~ M i Oda.'1'.Wat9 x O r9d a bO ox H x art 1 rX O O O~•p r KO K r O O py •C ite/wF+~Aa R • •G M~7m •O A m •r•~~ a61•. a•d a • Xr raF! • K a W tt A • A K p W~ R X A 'C ~~001 a a ~ ~a ~o~~. ~ o o •°~~'-~~•o m • Its • m ts~ ~ ~p ~ ~ -~ Raa Ro 0 NM R11-~iy0 A~ ~ MK O K a M il-M O • ~ O ~~ M ~ A~ p ~+ ~ R ~ ~ ~ Rr~ le+ X r g 1~+ R~10p+ ~w A ''C AI~Cw"CR ~ :Q~Q ~O~p p ~ . ag~~~o nm ~ maa~°t • a ~ K.. • . y ooa•e•taaY arb ttw o-~mtio a y ~aaa -+ ae ooaaom r-+ roK ar tfKxm K~ t OmXX ~ r H•C X O a er a r• a O O a ~Q O e?,q m m • r-Rf O a•t a ra K rrt0 b a< m O t g m C -+ a+ Kra f+ -~+ O'CJ Ap O r • a a • -C • r K K • • ~G ~ A~ a 00 OOO~GtlaAa "COIr OK O• O G R• K R a rt • -; O p• 'O K a 5r R R 1-• r a~~oa~iKpp~~ o00 ~a ~1°t 1~Pa a m~a O~Xh+ A K a ad ¢O O O A MI+pOrMA R 00 a MMp FK+~<1-~ M M K~ y ~ • a Gs • A O w it Y to m r tq OD a O a r lD •y di W y A~rp-h•ho~lat~ ~ g ~r~rS~e°it. ~ wc°t`~ai p~ ~ 1.. •.D•A •r0 • • OL• • m 1'"rq R m po O M t r r a • p,.p p, ~- K¢ a • a a ¢I ct a X~• r- K Z a ~gG•aR a~a a a o a a p-G~' • a• a. r+~c ~r ~-•t h ~ vOi ON ° N. A pOq a -t M ~ c~t m ~ ~ e ~ ~ a ~ so~ f~ ~ O't Oa- `~ R~' A~ A ~~ ~H 1'~ ~ QG M ~~p~-a+~ •O~ M~lrai.h ~ ~ w~ `X O a AXR Jip M~Ip., p'' p R Ra O p ~ K ~~ o K ~ r R ~ ~a ~A~ a pr ~ K R ~• M y r r O O~ ~ ~ ~ ?Am ~Wm ~m m~ O d D~~ ~ A d...~~..~or.~~p3~CZ••i0o ~ X'N m 1G d o °i O Oni m ~ •.• m H ~ d A d C ~ a N o <'~ar•N 0 3m ~m• X d a m m-q'"~3A ~ ~~ d ~ ~ ~ N Q m ~ 3 „~• b Q A d d d y O m a ~ ~ ~ ~ C u m