Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout7/10/1990 - Regularp AN ,~ F a ~ ~. p 2 .~ 18 ~ 88 8~$QUfCENTENN~~'~ 4 B~a~ri~u/BtRinning e~ (~aunfy of iRnttnnkr g98g ROANORE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA JULY 10, 1990 Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meeting. Regular meetings are held on the second Tuesday and the fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public Hearings will be heard at 7:00 p.m on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. HOLDING PUBLIC HEARINGS AFTERNOON SESSION (3:00 P.M ) A• OPENING CEREMONIES 1• Roll Call. 2• Invocation: Dr. Robert L. Wayne Lynn Haven Baptist Church 3• Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag. B• REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS. C• PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS AND AWARDS D• NEW BUSINESS 1• Adoption of Resolution officially designating Penn Forest Park as C. Darrell Shell Memorial Park. 2. Request to add private roads to Rural Addition 1 Program. 3. Request from School Board for appropriation to the School Textbook Fund for 1989-90. 4• Approval of Public Private Partnership - Optical Cable Corporation. E• REQUEST FOR WORK SESSIONS F• REQUEST FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS G. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 1• Ordinance authorizing the reconveyance of the former fire station site in the Roanoke-Botetourt Industrial Park to the Greater Roanoke Valley Development Foundation and the Roanoke Valley Development Corporation. H• SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1• Ordinance to conditionally rezone approximately 1.25 acres from R-1 to B-2 to construct a convenience store with gas pumps, located on Hardy Road, approximately 0.4 mile west of Feather Road, Vinton Magisterial District upon the request of Henry J. Brabham IV. 1CONTINUED FROM JUNE 26 1990) I. APPOINTMENTS 1. Board of Zoning Appeals 2 2• Building Code Board of Adjustments and Appeals 3. Community Corrections Resources Board 4• Landfill Citizens Advisory Committee 5• League of Older Americans Board of Directors 6• Cable TV Negotiating Committee J• REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS R• CONSENT AGENDA ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY. 1• Approval of Minutes - June 12, 1990 L• CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS 1• Mrs. Gary Flora or Mrs. James Graham to speak regarding property damage caused by runoff from Hidden Valley Junior High School. M• REPORTS 1• Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance 2. General Fund Unappropriated Balance 3• Board Contingency Fund N• WORK SESSION 1• 1991 Legislative Program - Virginia Association of Counties . 3 O• EXECUTIVE SESSION pursuant to the Code of Virginia Section 2.1-344 (a) P• CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE SESSION EVENING SESSION Q• SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES AND PUBLIC HEARINGS 790-1 Public Hearing for the purpose of hearing comments with respect to the amendments to the Consolidation Agreement and adoption of measures authorizing the execution of the amended agreement. 790-2 Public Hearing and Second Reading of Ordinance requesting vacation of an existing 20 foot waterline easement located on Lots 9 and 10, Block 1, Section 8, LaBellvue Subdivision, Hollins Magisterial District. R• ADJOURNMENT 4 ~~ t F ~ t 2 i8 L~ ~ +ES~UICENTEMM~'~ ~ ~urh~let~~w~~ (4nuttfg of ~p~npl;e ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ACTION AGENDA JULY 10, 1990 ~-u~a~~ cm 1 '~I r ~~9~8~9 Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meeting. Regular meetings are held on the second Tuesday and the fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public Hearings will be heard at 7:00 p.m on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. "'~n~ ~r~~L CSt AN EVENING HOLDING PUBLIC HEARINGS AFTERNOON SESSION (3.00 p M A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:07 P.M.) 1 • Roll Call. ALL PRESENT AT 3:07 P.M. 2• Invocation: Dr. Robert L. Wayne Lynn Haven Baptist Church 3• Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag. B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS. BLJ ADDED ITEM D-5: RESPONSE TO SENATOR MACFARLANE REGARDING PRIORITY OF ROANOKE VALLEY PROJECTS C. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS AND AWARDS SAM PRESENTED "BIG BUCKS" TO ECH IN RECOGNITION OF HIS WORTH TO ROANOKE COUNTY D• NEW BUSINESS 1 • Adoption of Resolution officially designating Penn Forest Park as C. Darrell Shell Memorial Park. R-71090-1 HCN MOTION TO ADOPT RESO URC RESO PRESENTED TO MRS. DARRELL SHELL 2. Request to add private roads to Rural Addition Program. A-71090-2 HCN MOTION TO APPROVE URC 3• Request from School Board for appropriation to the School Textbook Fund for 1989-90. A-71090-3 HCN MOTION TO APPROVE URC 4• Approval of Public Private Partnership -Optical Cable Corporation. A-71090-4 BLJ MOTION TO APPROVE URC 5• Approval of Response to Senator Granger MacFarlane regarding the priorities for state and federal funding in the Roanoke Valley BW REQUESTED BOARD APPROVAL OF DRAFT LETTER TO SENATOR MCFARLANE 2 HCN MOTION TO SEND LETTER WITH SUGGESTED AMENDMENT FROM SAM AYES-SAM,BLJ,HCN,RWR NAYS-LBE E• REQUEST FOR WORK SESSIONS NONE F• REQUEST FOR PUBLIC .HEARINGS NONE G. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance authorizing the reconveyance of the former fire station site in the Roanoke-Botetourt Industrial Park to the Greater Roanoke Valley Development Foundation and the Roanoke Valley Development Corporation. BLJ TO APPROVE 1ST READING SECOND - 7/24/90 URC H• SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1 • Ordinance to conditionally rezone approximately 1.25 acres from R-1 to B-2 to construct a convenience store with gas pumps, located on Hardy Road, approximately 0.4 mile west of Feather Road, Vinton Magisterial District upon the request of Henry J. Brabham IV. CONTINUED FROM JUNE 26 1990 3 0-71090-5 HCN TO APPROVE ORD. AYES-SAM,BLJ,HCN,RWR NAYS-LBE I. APPOINTMENTS A-71090-6 THE FOLLOWING NOMINATIONS WERE APPROVED BY UNANIMOUS RECORDED VOTE 1. Board of Zoning Appeals 2. Building Code Board of Adjustments and Appeals BLJ NOMINATED LARRY LESTER TO ANOTHER TERM AS ALTERNATE 3. Community Corrections Resources Board 4. Landfill Citizens Advisory Committee 5. League of Older Americans Board of Directors SAM NOMINATED MURRY K. WHITE HCN ASKED THAT A LETTER OF SYMPATHY BE SENT TO FAMILY OF MATTHEW BANKS 6. Cable N Negotiating Committee A-71090-6. a RWR NOMINATED SAM TO SERVE ON COMMITTEE THE ABOVE PEOPLE WERE APPOINTED TO SERVE BY UNANIMOUS RECORDED VOTE RATHER THAN PLACED ON 7/24/90 AGENDA - URC MHA TO REPORT BACK 7/24/90 ON NEED FOR ALTERNATES ON BUILDING CODE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT AND APPEALS AND COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS RESOURCES BOARD J. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS 4 SUPERVISOR EDDY: (1) ASKED FOR UPDATE ON POSSIBILITY OF RECYCLING ADVISORY COMMITTEE. ECH RECOMMENDED WORKING THROUGH THE CLEAN VALLEY COUNCIL O'N REGIONAL BASIS. LBE STILL FELT RECYCLING ADVISORY COMMITTEE WOULD BE HELPFUL AND MOVED TO ESTABLISH THE COMMITTEE IN ACCORDANCE WITH HIS MEMORANDUM FROM APRIL LBE WITHDREW MOTION AND ASKED FOR A REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION FROM STAFF ON 7/24/90. SAM ASKED THAT KELLY WHITNEY FROM CLEAN VALLEY COUNCIL ATTEND THAT MEETING (2) ASKED FOR UPDATE FROM PMM ON DUMPING OF ANIMAL WASTE AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL'S RULING REGARDING PENALTIES ATTACHED TO LATE FILING OF PERSONAL PROPERTY TAX. PMM WILL REPORT BACK TO BOARD ON 7/24/90 SUPERVISOR MCGRAW: (1) VACO SEARCH COMMITTEE HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED FOR A NEW EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR WITH ECH SERVING AND ROANOKE COUNTY HANDLING APPLICATIONS. UPPER END OF SALARY RANGE OF POSITION WAS INCREASED TO $75,000. (2) WILL BE ATTENDING NACO CONFERENCE IN MIAMI. SUPERVISOR JOHNSON: (1) ASK FOR RESOLUTION OF CONGRATULATIONS AND SUPPORT TO VIRGINIA AMATEUR SPORTS FOUNDATION ON THEIR ACHIEVEMENT AND SUCCESS IN RECENT GAMES AT 7/24/90 MEETING. (2) ASKED STAFF TO INITIATE DISCUSSION WITH BOTETOURT COUNTY OFFICIALS AND ROANOKE COUNTY AND BOTETOURT COUNTY SCHOOL BOARDS REGARDING THE POSSIBILITY OF A JOINT SCHOOL WITH BOTETOURT COUNTY. SUPERVISOR ROBERS: REPORTED THAT STAFF FROM VA. TECH HAS MET WITH THE CENTER FOR INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY TO DISCUSS PART THEY WILL PLAY IN DEVELOPMENT OF SMART HIGHWAY. K. CONSENT AGENDA ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY. 5 R-71090-7 RWR TO APPROVE UW 1 • Approval of Minutes -June 12, 1990 L. CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COITAMUNICATIONS 1 • Mr. Gary Flora, 1811 Electric Road and Mrs. James Graham, 4805 Greenlee Road to speak regarding property damage caused by runoff from Hidden Valley Junior High School. ASKED FOR ACTION IN ELIMINATING RUNOFF ONTO THEIR PROPERTY FROM HIDDEN VALLEY JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL RWR DIRECTED STAFF TO REPORT BACK TO BOARD ON 7/24/90 M. REPORTS HCN TO RECEIVE AND FILE UW 1 • Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance 2. General Fund Unappropriated Balance 3. Board Contingency Fund N• .WORK SESSION 1 • 1991 Legislative Program -Virginia Association of Counties PMM TO BRING BACK REPORT ON 7/24/90 RECOMMENDING TWO ISSUES TO BE INCLUDED IN VACO PROGRAM AND LIST OF OTHER REQUESTS TO BE DISCUSSED WITH LOCAL LEGISLATORS. O. EXECUTIVE SESSION pursuant to the Code of Virginia Section 2.1- 344 (a) 6 NONE P. CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE SESSION NONE EVENING SESSION (7.2_ 5_ Q. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES AND PUBLIC HEARINGS 790-1 Public Hearing for the purpose of hearing comments with respect to the amendments to the Consolidation Agreement and adoption of measures authorizing the execution of the amended agreement. ONE CITIZEN SPOKE IN SUPPORT: FIVE CITIZENS SPOKE IN OPPOSITION RR-7__8 SAM MOTION TO APPROVE AMENDMENTS BLJ ASKED TO SEPARATE ISSUES #1 -HCN SUBST. MOTION TO ADOPT ORIGINAL PLAN REGARDING SCHOOL BOARD COMPOSITION -DEFEATED AYES-BL.I,HCN NAYS-LBE,SAM,RWR #1- SAM MOTION TO APPROVE AMENDED SCHOOL BOARD COMPOSITION - APPROVED AYES - LBE,SAM,RWR NAYS- BLJ,HCN #2 -HCN SUBST. MOTION TO ADOPT ORIGINAL PLAN REGARDING GOVERNMENTAL SERVICES -DEFEATED AYES-BW,HCN NAYS-LBE,SAM,RWR #2 - LBE MOTION TO ADOPT AMENDED PLAN. REGARDING FIRE AND LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES -APPROVED AYES - LBE,SAM,RWR NAYS- BI-J,HCN #3 -HCN SUBST. MOTION TO APPROVE ORIGINAL PLAN REGARDING TERRITORY ALLOWED TO JOIN CITY OF SALEM -DEFEATED AYES-BLJ,HCN NAYS-LBE,SAM,RWR #3 -SAM MOTION TO EXPAND TERRITORY ALLOWED TO JOIN CITY OF SALEM -APPROVED AYES - LBE,SAM,BLJ, RWR NAYS- HCN #3 - BLJ MOTION TO RECONSIDER VOTE -URC #3 -SAM MOTION TO EXPAND TERRITORY ALLOWED TO JOIN CITY OF SALEM -APPROVED AYES - LBE,SAM,RWR NAYS- BLJ,HCN 790-2 Public Hearing and Second Reading of Ordinance requesting vacation of an existing 20 foot waterline easement located on Lots 9 and 10, Block 1, Section 8, LaBellvue Subdivision, Hollins Magisterial District. 0-71090-9 BLJ MOTION TO ADOPT ORD. URC R. ADJOURNMENT BLJ MOTION TO ADJOURN AT 8:15 P.M. UW s ~ 1 f AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JULY 10, 1990 RESOLUTION 71090-1 OFFICIALLY DESIGNATING PENN FOREST PARR AS C. DARRELL SHELL MEMORIAL PARR WHEREAS, C. Darrell Shell began employment with the County of Roanoke in 1967, serving as the County's first Director of Parks & Recreation; and WHEREAS, Mr. Shell worked tirelessly with the County Administration and School Administration to jointly use recreational facilities, thereby reducing the need to purchase additional land and reducing development costs to provide recreational opportunities to County residents; and WHEREAS, Mr. Shell was instrumental in obtaining matching grants whereby the level of benefit from the County's investment was increased by leveraging local contributions against the matching grants; and WHEREAS, Penn Forest Park serves as an outstanding example of these many facets of Mr. Shell's work for his community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County that Penn Forest Park be officially designated as C. DARRELL SHELL MEMORIAL PARK in recognition of Mr. Shell's contributions to the County and that a certified copy of this resolution be forwarded to his family in his memory. On motion of Supervisor Nickens, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: ~• C^~-Qi~~~ Mary H. llen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File John Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator Steve Carpenter, Director, Parks & Recreation ACTION N0. ITEM NUMBER ~ ` AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: July 10, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: Adoption of a Resolution officially designating Penn Forest Park as the C. Darrell Shell Memorial Park COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S,r COMMENTS: J~/~ 2+/r.av ~,.cc-g~/' ?~,~/~ ..~~.-, ~"'~'~ ' ~W^G~Gt')'Y~.r-1.~w,ti ~/'~]'`'~ti'{S'L"`'c~ r J ~ f.~ . ~~Jl~~~i,.t'v"` -'W`-evi- GL .{•.4%au ~ ,~tyr~°'Z.t-.r.~..ti , b (~ EXECUTIVE S/JUMMARY: 0 J The County of Roanoke was saddened this spring by the death of C. Darrell Shell, Assistant Director of Recreation. Mr. Shell began his employment with Roanoke County in 1967, serving as the County's first Director of Parks & Recreation. Through his leadership and involvement, the County and School Administration arranged for joint use of many school properties, thus eliminating the need to purchase duplicate ball fields; Mr. Shell also worked to obtain numerous matching grants, thereby increasing the benefit of the County dollars invested for our various programs and facilities. Our program has expanded to provide a diversified recreational base for the County, including leisure activities, activities for senior adults and therapeutic patients, as well as traditional athletic type programs. The Parks and Recreation staff and Parks & Recreation Advisory Commission respectfully request that the Board of Supervisors consider renaming Penn Forest Park as C. Darrell Shell Memorial Park, because this facility is indicative of the many contributions Darrell Shell has made to his community. FISCAL IMPACT: None. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends adoption of the attached resolution, officially designating Penn Forest Park as C. Darrell Shell Memorial Park. Mrs. Shell will be present at the meeting on July 10, to receive a copy of this resolution. ~-/ Respectfully submitted, Approved by, m ~~ . ~~~ ~~~ I~ ' ohn M. Chambliss/,Tr. '-'` Elmer C. Hodge Assistant Administrator County Administrator -------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Eddy Received ( ) Johnson Referred ( ) McGraw To ( ) Nickens Robers ~-/ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, July 10, 1990 RESOLUTION OFFICIALLY DESIGNATING PENN FOREST PARK AS C. DARRELL SHELL MEMORIAL PARR WHEREAS, C. Darrell Shell began employment with the County of Roanoke in 1967, serving as the County's first Director of Parks & Recreation, and WHEREAS, Mr. Shell worked tirelessly with the County Administration and School Administration to jointly use recreational facilities, thereby reducing the need to purchase additional land and reducing development costs to provide recreational opportunities to County residents, and WHEREAS, Darrell was instrumental in obtaining matching grants whereby the level of benefit from the County's investment was increased by leveraging local contributions against the matching grants, and WHEREAS, Penn Forest Park serves as an outstanding example of these many facets of Mr. Shell's work for his community, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County that Penn Forest Park be officially designated as C. Darrell Shell Memorial Park in recognition of Mr. Shell's contribution to the County and forward a certified copy of this resolution to his family in his memory. ACTION # A-71090-2 ITEM NUMBER ~ - -Z AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: July 10, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: Request to Add Private Roads to Rural Addition Program COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~~C~.-,-,~,,~~ ERECUTIVE SUMMARY: Each year staff brings to the Board of Supervisors petitions received for consideration and addition to the Rural Addition Priority List. Upgrade of these private roads to Secondary Systems Standards is completed by using Rural Addition Funds within the VDOT Secondary System Six Year Construction Plan. BACKGROUND Under Section 33.1-72.1 C-1 of the Code of Virginia, counties are allowed to use a small portion of their Secondary System Construction Funds for Rural Addition. In February of 1989, the Board of Supervisors approved the current Rural Addition Priority List of 14 roads, which included some previous year requests, as well as, petitions received during that year (Attachment "A"). During the past year Hyers Road has been reconstructed. Also, survey and acquisition of right-of-ways and easements on Penwood Drive, Bushdale Road and Camney Lane have been started. Washington Road is being considered under a Virginia Community Development Block Grant Program. - ~ ,- SUrIl~IARY OF INFORMATION Improvements to the following roads have been requested by a minimum of 75~ of the property owners along the road. 1. Susquehanna Road and Indian Hill Road (Westward Lakes) - located in the northwest portion of Roanoke County. 2. Artrip Lane - located in the northwest portion of Roanoke County. 3, Hemlock Avenue - located in southwest Roanoke County (Rt. 220 South Area), 4. Smokey Ridge Road - located in southwest Roanoke County in the Oak Grove Area. Attachment "B" provides a summary of current and proposed roads and includes potential problems and estimated cost. As of July 1, 1990, the Rural Addition Account (available State Funds) is estimated to be $300,000. The yearly Rural Addition fund allocation in the Secondary System Six Year Construction Plan is now $106,000. Based on this funding level, VDOT acceptance and construction would not start on these additional roads for an estimated ten (10) years. Staff is recommending that these additional roads be added to the Priority List based on the method of prioritization previously approved. This method of prioritization maintains previously approved projects and their relative priority, and adds new roads with their priority being based on the lowest construction cost per family. ALTERNATIVES AND IMPACTS Funds for the construction of Rural Addition Roads to Secondary Standards are included in the VDOT Secondary System Six Year Construction Plan. Local funds are required for survey, development of plans, and securing right-of-ways and easements. The FY 90-91 Roadway Hudget has funds to cover these activities for two (2) roads. 2 ~, STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors approve the 1990- 91 Rural Addition Priority List as shown in Attachment "B". SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: O ti ~~ ~l rhillip Henry, ,E, ''~ Director of Engineering Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved (x) Motion by: Harry C. Nickens No Yes Abs Denied ( ) to approve priority list Eddy x Received ( ) Johnson x Referred McGraw x To Nickens x Robers x cc: File Phillip Henry, Director, Engineering John Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator 3 -~ ATTACHMENT "A" RURAL ADDITION PRIORITY LIST 1989-90 ROAD DISTANCE FAMILIES PROBLEMS ESTIMATED SERVED SEEN COST Penwood Drive 900' 7 18~ Grade $ 90,000 Right of Way & Drainage Easements Required Significant Grading Sagewood Circle 1100' 5 Right of Ways & Drainage $ 100,000 Required Significant Grading Create Steep Driveways Washington Road 600' 3 Possible Damage Two Houses $ 150,000 Coordination with CDBG Project Chester Drive 300' 3 20% Grade $ 50,000 Right of Way Required Byers Road 800' 6 Right of Way & Drainage $ 60,000 Easements have been acquired Bushdale Road 1100' 7 Right of Way & Drainage $ 120,000 Easements Required Possible New Location SUBTOTAL ~ 570,000 Camney Lane 700' 4 Drainage Easement Required $ 50,000 Property Owner Participation Futurama Drive 900' li Right of Way & Drainage $ 60,000 Easement Required Significant Property Damage Improvements on Bandy Road Required Marigold Circle 500' 7 Right of Way & Drainage $ 50,000 Easement Required 4 Houses Close to Road ~-z ATTACHMENT "A" RURAL ADDITION PRIORITY LIST 1989-90 CONTINUED ROAD DISTANCE FAMILIES PROBLEMS ESTIMATED SERVED SEEN COST Cabin Creek Drive 500' 6 Right of Way & Drainage $ 60,000 Easement Required Lawyer Drive 1600' 8 Significant Property Damage Drainage Problems $ 120,000 Walls in Right of Way Speculative Interest Autumn Drive 700' 3 Right of Way & Drainage $ 50,000 Easement Required Speculative Interest Bluebird Lane 3400' 9 Drainage Easement $ 170,000 Required Speculative Interest Creekside Drive 1100' 3 18~ Grade $ 80,000 Speculative Interest SUBTOTAL ~ 640,000 TOTAL $1,210,000 5 - .~i ATTACHMENT "B" PROPOSED RURAL ADDITION PRIORITY LIST 1990-91 ROAD DISTANCE FAMILIES PROBLEMS ESTIMATED SERVED SEEN COST Penwood Drive 900' 7 18~ Grade $ 90,000 Right of Way & Drainage Easements Required Significant Grading Sagewood Circle 1100' 5 Right of Ways & Drainage $ 100,000 Required Significant Grading Create Steep Driveways Washington Road 600' 3 Possible Damage Two Houses $ 150,000 Coordination with CDBG Project Chester Drive 300' 3 20o Grade $ 50,000 Right of Way Required Bushdale Road 1100' 7 Right of Way & Drainage $ 120,000 Easements Required Possible New Location Camney Lane 700' 4 Drainage Easement Required $ 50,000 Property Owner Participation Futurama Drive 900' 11 Right of Way & Drainage $ 60,000 Easement Required Significant Property Damage Improvements on Bandy Road Required Marigold Circle 500' 7 Right of Way & Drainage $ 50,000 Easement Required Houses Close to Road Cabin Creek Drive 500' 6 Right of Way & Drainage $ 60,000 Easement Required Significant Property Damage Lawyer Drive 1600' 8 Drainage Problems $ 120,000 Walls in Right of Way Speculative Interest 6 -1. ATTACHMENT "B" PROPOSED RURAL ADDITION PRIORITY LIST 1990-91 CONTINUED ROAD DISTANCE FAMILIES PROBLEMS ESTIMATED SERVED SEEN COST Autumn Drive 700' 3 Right of Way & Drainage $ 50,000 Easement Required Speculative Interest Bluebird Lane 3400' 9 Drainage Easement $ 170,000 Required Speculative Interest Creekside Drive 1100' 3 18o Grade $ 80,000 Speculative Interest SUBTOTAL $1,150,000 Artrip Lane 300' 4 Right of Way & Drainage $ 20,000 Easement Required Smokey Ridge Road 800' 6 Right of Way & Drainage $ 60,000 Easements Required, turn around area may be a problem. Private Property damage Indian Hi11 Road Susquehanna Range 1300' 4 Right of Way & Drainage $ 105,000 Easements Required. Speculative Interest Hemlock Avenue 1500' 5 Right of Way & Drainage $ 150,000 Easements Required. Significant Private Property Damage SUBTOTAL $ 335,000 TOTAL $1,485,000 7 A ~, Sfn r A ~ GLEN -_ , MIvN ~ ~ V I ~] \ ,, ,...~..... w 1r.. r s ~ ~J~~ l\w,, s*~r eo NfMT E.\yT: / axle cwcpNs •. EX/T 'tai ~% ~: ~f ~ i V~ h' ,~ ~ °` ~' ~~ _~ ~ ~ P ~~ NAR~ ~ i ' ~l \- ~/~ ` 817 ~•,- ~ VICINITY MAP z~ %' ~ J f~ y ~ N v ,r, ,. ~ y__~ ew~s+Ma ~n-w S- ,,. ~ / 1'` `, ~_.!J /_~ NORTH 4R~ _ fps \ s\~~~/t/,,/~Q t~:~ ~0~- _ _ ,... T ~y~l~os SMIGMhNC ~ °fi~ ~ `~!o~y! -~ 8 r ` ~'!;"~*~~~_ _ O S~ ~~ ~~ p V 4y ~ ~' I~F~' T v'~5~ ~~ p ~ RD ~ ~J .~ ~ :. ~ ~A ~~ ~ e ~ f• ~ 8 41 ~ ~ y t~ ~ 4 ~~ d ~ ~~ ~~ ~f4r "Lii• j c,.,s , V l£ CK r~ b c ~ A+'~7 f /~~ / t f ~ GRE[ ~ fl~M'~S4TDH. ~': ~i it ~ ~ S O ~'-,- ~ w - ,~ R _ r ~..W~ ~~ v °tv.. ~• t t sr~ o~Ma u M R pa, NGT . tt~~ a'r ~'• I~ ~ `4~ ~~ b ETON MILI /} ~ ^^: +~"~~~g ~~ _. ~ VICINITY bIAP ,p 4 ~ ~s ~' ~'L. \ r. Q~' i n / f r A/Aa~rv ~~- E5 ~ ~~ °~~w`u ~0 .~ A ~~ 1~ ;. t ~~ 1 ~~ ioi ~.~ ~\ ~ y(~- ~~ u c~~b{~~ BFAF ,~ VICINITY AfAP ~~~ u ` tom', ~ { " ~'` s t~ `$~ .~.. .1J '- NORTB NORTB COM~lUNITYSERYICES FI'-90-91 RURAL ADD'TIO'_v AND DEVELOPMENT ~ 1 Hemlock Avenue A-71090-3 ACTION # ____ ITEM NUMBER MEETING DATE: July 10, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: Appropriation to the School Textbook Fund for 1989-90 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: UI-cu~"~" °~~ BACKGROUND: The Roanoke CountYurchasin Boand tissuintball g g department is responsible for p textbooks and materials to students and classroom teachers. The Holt Reading Series concluded its final adoption year in 1989-90; therefore, all out-of-adoption Holt materials were collected by the textbook agent and returned to the publisher for cash urchase The money received, $22,000.00, has been expended to p textbooks and materials needed for special education and the career exploration programs. Inasmuch as the 1989-90 budget for the textbook fund did not include the $22,000.00 in revenue or expenditure, the request is being made at this time for an director of budget appropriation to said fund. Dr. Jerry Hardy, and data manageme tionsr relatedetootheyr quest S~ will be present to answer any ques FISCAL IMPACT: Revenue received from Holt has offset expenditures. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends appropriation of $22,000.00 to the 1989-90 School Textbook Fund. _/ ~ - ~~it,,,v ~~ J et Slau hter Elmer C. Hodge Textbook Agent C-unty Administrator ---------------------- ----------------------- VOTE ACTION No yeS Abs Harr C. Nicken~ddy x Approved ( x) Motion by: Y Denied ( ) to approve appropriation _ Johnson x _ McGraw x Received ( ) Nickens x Referred ( ) Robers x -. To cc: File Dr. Jerry Hardy, Director, Budget & Data Mgt, Roanoke Schoo s Ruth Wade, Clerk, School Board Reta Busher, Director, Management & Budget Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance ~~ FROM THE MINUTES OF THE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD OF ROANOKE COUNTY, MEETING IN REGULAR SESSION AT 7 P.M. ON JUNE 28, 1990 IN THE BOARD ROOM OF THE SCHOOL ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, SALEM, VIRGINIA. RESOLUTION REQUESTING AN APPROPRIATION TO THE SCHOOL TEXTBOOK FUND FOR 1989-90 WHEREAS, the School Textbook Fund has received additional revenue than the amount budgeted for 1989-90 and has incurred expenditures offsetting said revenue; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the County School Board of Roanoke County, on motion of Charlsie S. Pafford and duly seconded, requests an appropriation in the amount of $22,000.00 to the School Textbook Fund for 1989-90 for the additional revenue received and expenditures incurred for the fiscal year. Adopted on the following recorded vote: AYES: Paul G. Black, Maurice L. Mitchell, Charlsie S. Pafford, Frank E. Thomas NAYS: None ABSENT: Barbara B. Chewning TESTE• ~~~ ~~ - Clerk c: Mrs. Diane Hyatt ACTION # A-71090-4 ITEM NUMBER ~ - AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: July 10, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: Public-Private Partnership Agreement for Optical Cable Corporation COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY' Staff is recommending that the Board approve a public-private partnership for Optical Cable Corporation. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Lingerfelt Development Corporation has requested approval of a public-private partnership for Optical Cable Corporation to fund utility connection fees for their new cable manufacturing facility to be constructed in Valleypointe. An analysis of the project indicates that the $60, 066 in fees will be met within the first three years by estimated annual real estate and machinery and tools tax receipts of $64,750. These utility connections will provide additional capacity for company expansion in the future. Staff has done an analysis of the Optical Cable Corporation project and has determined that it qualifies under the Public-Private Partnership Policy. FISCAL IMPACT' $100,000 is available for public-private partnerships in the Economic Development fund in the fiscal year 1990-91 budget. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Economic Development Fund reimburse the Utility Fund in the amount of $60,066 as being in accordance with the Public-Private Partnership Policy. ~~ SUBMITTED BY: ~/ V~V ~D~ Timothy W. Gubala, Director Economic Development Approved ( x ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to APPROVED: ~,~~ ~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ACTION Motion by: Bob T 7ohnGOn to approve VOTE No Yes Abs Eddy x Johnson x McGraw x Nickens x Robers x cc: File Timothy W. Gubala, Director, Economic Development Reta Busher, Director, Management & Budget Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance ° .- :.-~ / r ~- ~, ~ l ,,`) NS rv, ~, ~. r r~. ~. MEMORANDUM TO: Tim Gubala and Diane Hyatt FROM: Cliff Craig DATE: May 23, 1990 SUBJECT: Connection Fees for Optical Cable I have received the plans for the Optical Cable facility at Valleypointe. The plans indicate a 6" fire service and a 3" domestic service. The fees for the above are calculated as follows: Water Off-Site Facility Fee for 6" Fire Service $19,096 Water Off-Site Facility Fee for 3" Domestic Service 23,870 Water Basic Connection Fee for 6" Fire Service 7,600 Water Basic Connection Fee for 3" Domestic Service 2,000 Sewer Off-Site Facility Fee Based on 3" Water Service 7.500 TOTAL WATER AND SEWER CONNECTION FEE 60 066 The basic connection fee for the 3" domestic has been reduced from $3,800 to $2,000 to reflect the use of a single meter vault for both fire and domestic service. (Note that they have changed from a 1 1/2" service to a 3" service. This increases the cost of water $21,303 and increases the cost of sewer $5,000 from that of Ingersoll-Rand.) Please note this change on my May 11, 1990 memo for Ingersoll-Rand and Hansteck. When the payment of these fees by Economic Development is approved, Diane can make the transfers into the appropriate account as noted above. CC:mh ~~ r ~ AOANp,I.~ r ~ ,F p Z z °~ a~ 18 X50 88 SFSQUICENTENN~P~ .-1 BcautifulBtginning ~D11It~1J D~ ~D~inA~2F AI I~~MERILA LITY '' I I'' 1979 1989 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE July 10, 1990 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS RICHARD W. ROBERS. CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERUIL DISTRICT STEVEN A. MCGRAW, VICE-CHAIRMAN CATAWE3A MAGISTERUIL DISTRICT LEE B. EDDY WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT The Honorable J. Granger Macfarlane P.O. Box 201 Roanoke, Virginia 24002 Dear Senator MacFarlane: The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors disagrees with your opinion that a "leadership vacuum" exists in the Roanoke Valley. We believe that the Board of Supervisors, along with the Town Council of Vinton and the City Councils of Salem and Roanoke, are providing the leadership necessary to take the Roanoke Valley into the twenty-first century. The Board is elected by the citizens of Roanoke County to plan for the future and to set priorities, and we believe we have done so. The County supports a variety of projects which will benefit our children and grandchildren, such as Spring Hollow Reservoir, the Regional Landfill, the "smart highway" from Roanoke to Blacksburg, an upgrade of the Roanoke Sewage Treatment Plant and Explore. Your premise that state funding for these projects will be undercut by funding for Explore is unsubstantiated. We know of no local landfill or reservoir in the entire state of Virginia which is entitled to state funds - and our landfill and reservoir are no exception. State money for Explore will have no effect on most of the important undertakings mentioned in your correspondence. The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors made an informed decision, based on facts, in voting to support the Explore Project, and we will continue to do so. At the present time, Explore is one of our top economic development priorities, and we will devote the resources of the County to its continued success. We have already reaped at least one benefit - the preservation and maintenance, by the State, of one of the most beautiful pieces of property in Virginia, for use by future generations. It is forever safe from commercial development and will become a lovely addition to our state parks. P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24018-0798 (703) 772-2004 Letter to J. Granger Macfarlane July 10, 1990 Page two You asked for our thoughts, ideas, comments and recommenda- tions - here they are. Please spend your time in the Senate obtaining as much funding as possible for all of the important projects in the Roanoke Valley. In the meantime, Roanoke County continues to support Explore as a meaningful and worthwhile venture, and we expect that our representatives in the General Assembly will do the same. Sincerely, L~/ ichard W. Robe s, Chairman Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: The The The The The The The The The The The The The The Honorable Honorable Honorable Honorable Honorable Honorable Honorable Honorable Honorable Honorable Honorable Mayor and Mayor and Mayor and James R. Olin, Member L.F. Payne, Member of Virgil H. Goode, Jr. Dudley J. Emick, Jr. Elliot S. Schewel Lacey E. Putney C. Richard Cranwell A. Victor Thomas Clifton A. Woodrum Willard R. Finney G. Steven Agee Members of Council, Town Members of Council, City Members of Council, City of Congress Congress of Vinton of Salem of Roanoke G I TY OF SALEM, VIRGINIA P. O. BOX 869 174 N. BROAD STREET SALEM. VIRGINIA 24153-0869 July 10, 1990 Mr. Richard W. Robers Chairman Roanoke County Board of Supervisors P. 0. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 Dear Dick: Council at its regular meeting held last evening finished its series of public hearings with the citizens of the Catawba Magisterial District and the City of Salem regarding the proposed merger of Valley governments. The overwhelming consensus of opinion, including the residents of Roanoke County, clearly indicated the proposal offered of $16,000,000 was unfair to all concerned. The suggested range of payment to the Roanoke Metropolitan Government was: $3,566,832 - actual amount of debt in area--June 1989 $9,752,549 - 14.9 percent assessment ratio--June 1989 This is also the exact range suggested at the Mason's Cove and Glenvar Elementary School meetings by Roanoke County citizens. Salem City Council has authorized me to make the following proposal (by motion unanimously passed): The City of Salem will pay the Roanoke Metropolitan Government $6,371,490 over a 5-year period for the listed capital facilities, to include buildings, equipment, and all furnishings. In the same motion, Council rejected any consideration of a 25-year annexation moratorium. I have arrived at the $6,371,490 payment by using your June 30, 1989, budget summary of debt requirements. According to this docu- ment, on July 1, 1993, you will owe $42,590,174, exclusive of any new debt such as the Spring Hollow Reservoir, the sewer plant expansion, and the Bradshaw landfill. Accordingly, we have computed $42,590,174 at 14.96 percent, which equates to $6,371,490. Mr. Richard W. Robers Page 2 July 10, 1990 Salem feels this is a reasonable and fair offer based on the premise there should be no "winners" and no "losers." We respect- fully request that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors give the same consideration to the residents of the Catawba Magisterial District, along with the welfare of the remaining County residents, and treat them equally. If you have any questions, I will be happy to meet with you at your convenience to further the progress of this area. Sincerely, a s~ Taliaferro yor JET:kac cc: Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Roanoke City Council Salem City Council Media as requested Totai 369,137 ?,000,000 80,000 3,767,704 J,375,822 (35,C ~0) (174,432) x,166,300 ti~ ~" ~ ~_ _ r N M 00 N O N 1f7 ~ CO CD O T O M~ O U'~ < Q> C'7 ~ O CD _ CD an C1 (D M 1A ~ ~ ~ N_ 1A_ N O ~ `~. t fV ~ (h CO N CO M r O 1~ ~ to M CO tD M M CL ~p ~ C t17 ~_ ~ e v_ ~ O C O M M< G! u'1 C~ Q~ O Q~ 1i ;~ O M N _ _ 1~ 1~ CD cD !'7 N N N r O O C ~? ry. F""' ti f` ~ t` ?tD < V' ~ M C"J M C') r r r r r r ti d _ '~'_ I ,nr~rnoooovN~ ti E N r C :ti N LL7 O <D (D /~ M O a7 N N O 1~ L(') N (D C ti N 07 (") O O d a1 cp W O M N ti O ~? '- 0 07 M A N~~ O M O O 1_ ~ 6T CO O ~ N r 'C OJ CD OO ~['Y 00 W CO CD N O Q~ ~ N ~ t0 t~ ~D ~ O r ~ (D Q~ 'C I~ N 1~ N 1` ~ (D r ("~ ~ C O 1~ C 'CO tf) Q N O OD 1~ 1A M M N N r O M N N N 'r r r r r N ~ «4 ' .,~ N f` O 1['1 1~ ~t~ 1~ N ~ ~ ~f) t1) N W N N N ~ O 07 CO O ~ E"" w ~ 01 fD O~ L7 a0 CD C f• f• ~ f` C p C C C f• O O N I O 'Z h. 0 0 0 -N C"7 N ~ ~ 11'~ t[7 N Qj N N N ~ 07 to N M ~ V ~[") st <O N ~(D O ~ tlC M M O C,O 11') O t!1 C' N O ~ cD W ~ C ti f• r Q7 ~N fQ C to ~ O ~ cD CD C N ti M N CO i CD N st 1.- ~ .(D OO 1` 00 CO W 07 O O O O O O O O M I O W d. C .~ C Q iC N N N N N N M ~ _ s~ _ 4~ ~ CO 1n tf') CO O I~ tl0 1~ CD C^J O 1~ OD O O M r M ti ~ ~ 1A O r~ O Q! CD 1~ M 1f') M CO GD M C N (3 O~ N to KV OO O O C7 st O Q_ 1 R 0? OO ~ t2') N o? ~ t0 W W O f` M M E N ti O c0 cD 1~ cD f~ W 1~ 1~ O H O M O ,~ r~ ti ~p p p O N N N N N M M ti O d? Q? Q? Q? Q? V~ C`7 C'~ O O O O 1f') ~ O ~ ~ tt7 tn, r N ~"" '~ ~"' r r r r ~ r r ~-- r r r r N ~ 69 m c "' ~ r co r~ ca ao 0o M o0 m ~ ~ LL ~ ~~~vvu~~ie~no~~rnr~cornvoc_n~~~,~c~ril~n ~ O O [D ~_ CD M r CD tD ~ L1'~ ~ ~ f• O N r CO ~ I N W y d N cD N N oo O O c'') V' tD O tD ~ O CD s!' r a0 C O ~ i ~ O 47 O f` tD 1A tf) ~t C M M N N r r r r f` ~ a ; ~ ~., t- ~ .A i ~ :: ~aorn~rM~rlN O~naoM•-M1~1~r~oMMO ~n tL C a. ~wu~,caMOC 0000~(D'ctM coo^~~o~~olrn W ~roo~r_c~r~~col:~nmc? cDU-1aoM~rS ai (j~ V ~D O t1') N M CO ~ O~ O M ch cD O r C CO (D O C C N CD cD M C~ O r ("~ O y O r r N R"7 CO GO 6~ c0 ti ti O M M M M C '~t 'C ~ i a' ~ a r r r r it ,Z Q ~ fr9 t fR Q W r ~ '- N C C7 r N tD "7 t[1 st O ~" N N QMi Q1 0o O N N ti t17 ~ r~ ~ Q~i M O I O C r O M M O 07 tf') CO _ t`J O Q! CD CD N ti r- O r IN N if') O sT C") 1~ tD K'7 ~ J ~ ~ O N 1~ t~ IC" ~ ~ ~ [D ~l") CD 1~ a0 ~ ~ Q O N fD 00 M 1~ M O t~ ~7 O O O N N O N M ~L. Q W C p r O ~ OO CO I _ L!') ~ C ~ ~C C? OO t` CO 1~ cD t[) ~7 N O V Z ~ ~"~ N N r r r r ~ r r r r r rv ~ ~L ' m fa ~ M (D M f~ CG f~ N CO O 1~ CD r O! 1A N ~ ~D CO ~ N M 01 1~ cD Q! ~"' f" OI ~ t~ Q r IN (07 ~ tf> ~ CD 1f') C') Q? Q1 tf~ t _ ~ < ~ ~ N _ r COO ~ tO') N O O ~ Q ~ N n aT 1~ O ISM ~ O to O 'C 00 N CD M *- N O ~ C p1 O ti f` ~D ~ 1f') 'ct C M N N r r r f` U ~ - ~ ~ ~_ ~ lC tl'f M ("~ tD N 1~ ~ ~ t!') N N tf) ~ to ~A tl~ 1A ~ COI O Z ~ CO st N O M tD I~ 1~ 1~ Q ~' st f~ 1~ 1` 1~ 1~ 1` 1~ N O V N ~ CO O~CD ~ O ~ O - ^ N N 1A LL'>_ tL)_ tf)_ t17 1f') r_ N CO LL ~ V N~ r M CL7 v CO O tCJ 1~ N r M o0 a7 O O H cD N Q (',L C N O) 1~ 1~ O N ~ f` Q> N ~ t!7 N !~ M ~I7 O C O N N N '- r r N 0 0 0 0 ~ _ CD CD tf') (D to C C' N ~ d r r r r r r r r r r r r f• W 64 J ~ - CO f• N M CD N ti~ M r CO 1A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N Q O CD M C N M N O M C 1~ st W t 1A ~ f` M O N 01 DD ti 1A 1tJ C~J . ~ ~ M C N I O ~t to CD C N C O C _ .0 Q~ M (D i to 1~ '<T N O O tD 00 p U C ~ N N N cD N N N _ ~ Q 7 M M M M N r r r r r r N N ~ (aA 69 t _ _ M M O tD ,~ f• N f` M~ O~ O O O O O O O O I r• O N I N M ~IJ tf7 M O CD 1` Q ~ d f _ N 1A 1A `7 t~ ~ CO O (D CO (") O_ d b O C M O C t!7 M CO 1~ N I N ''''~~ C ~ ~Ci O M v M N O Q) ~ O C O C N O N 1~ iLf') `Q' M M N O G r r ~ 64 En N C ~ ~ Q) M 1~ N~~ O ~1 ~ O~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N O V f` ~ M CO M M i r CO D7 O O O O r f` d N N N ~ N r r I 69 69 ~ J Q O N M `7 ~ fD 1~ CO O ~ N M Iv t27 cD 1~ M Q! O ~ ~~ O O O O Q~ O'1 O Q> 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O N N ("') ~' lA CD f~ CO ~ y y ~~ ~, ~ O~~~ Q! Q! Q! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ r Q1 Q] 0 0 0 0 0 0 07 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .~ r r r r r r r r r O'1 N N N N N (V N N N 1 ` ~ 'v'im Vii? ~ '- ~1 ('> Catdebt3 ~ ~/ Count) of Roano'te ~'~'' Debt Considerations for Yap III ~ YaT 25, 1490 '~~ ;' ~^ Method A Total Property Assessaents Roanoke CountT Propertl Assess~ents Yap Area S of Total General Obligation Debt: Principal Interest Multiplied b~ Assesssent Ratio Less:Debt on Assets in Mnp Area Yet Pro-Rata Share of Debt Method R ----------------------- Bzisting Debt in Yap Area as of June 30, 1489: Glenvar High School-ActivitT Glenvar High School-Air Conditioning Glenvar Ble~entarl-Clnssraoas Glenvar Bigh Scbool-Lighting Green Bi11 Patt Maeans Cove Bles-Cafeteria Yhispeting Pines Park Roanoke River Interceptor Cherokee Bills Mater SJstet Mason Cove Fire and Rescue Station Catawba Fire and Rescue Station ~~ ~1 .~ ,. .'~ J b '~~ Yap I~~ 2,164,591,105 306,416,OST ll.oax 45,384,863 19,805,910 65,190,833 z 1I.09S 1,229,663 (2,560,534 ) 4,669,129 Yap I Principal! Interest s631,S30 651,500 421,833 111,458 398,022 143,268 124,923 ~;y ~~ .~. r ~; t . _ v ~' 'y ~~ ~~ .~~ J % ~~ ., 1. _ ~ - .{ ~ ~ L,~' ti '~ ~i ,n `- ~ ,~ ,,r, r / ~ ~`J~ ~ ~/ Yap III -------------- 2,164,054,420 411,3flI,1fl1 14.465 45,384,863 19,805,470 65,190,833 z 14.965 9,TSZ S (3,566,832) 6,185,111 Yap III Principal/ Interest 5631,530 651,500 421,833 111,458 398,022 315,432 13,635 143,268 124,923 489,561 61,664 -------------- ------------- Total Bzistint Debt in the Yap Area 52,560,534 53,566,832 5 .~ ACTION NO. ITEM NO. - AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE C COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: July 10, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING RECONVEYANCE OF THE FORMER JOINT FIRE STATION SITE IN THE ROANOKE-BOTETOURT INDUSTRIAL PARK TO GREATER ROANOKE VALLEY DEVELOP- MENT FOUNDATION AND ROANOKE VALLEY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~~tcrr-w,~u~-2~' cc EXECUTIVE SUMMARY• This is the first reading of the proposed ordinance to authorize reconveyance of the former joint fire station site in the Roanoke-Botetourt Industrial Park to Greater Roanoke Valley Development Foundation and Roanoke Valley Development Corporation. BACKGROUND• By Deed of Gift dated October 20, 1986, the Greater Roanoke Valley Development Foundation (GRVDF) and the Roanoke Valley Development Corporation (RVDC), both Virginia corporations, conveyed two parcels of land, aggregating 4.355 acres, more or less, on the north side of Route 460 in the Bonsack area of the County of Botetourt to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, and the Board of Supervisors of Botetourt County, Virginia. (See copy of plat -- Attachment A). Parcel A, contain- ing 2.172 acres, was donated for the purpose of constructing the Roanoke County-Botetourt County Joint Library. Parcel B, consisting of 2.183 acres, was donated for the construction of a fire station. The deed contained a condition providing for reversion of Parcel B to the Grantors in five (5) years if the Counties had not appropriated funds for and had not begun construction of a fire station on this parcel. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Counties have since reached an agreement to construct the joint fire station, known as the Read Mountain Fire Station, on a parcel of land along Route 604 iri Botetourt County. Parcel B, as G-~ described above, will not be used for the specified purpose and the property will automatically revert to GRVDF and RVDC on November 24, 1991. During the interim, there are no plans for use of Parcel B and there is no reason for the Counties to retain ownership through the reversionary period. GRVDF and RVDC have requested that the Counties reconvey Parcel B so that other uses can be made of the property without delay. The Board of Supervisors of Botetourt County approved this reconveyance on April 16, 1990. FISCAL IMPACTS: None ALTERNATIVES• (i) Authorize the County Administrator to execute a deed for reconveyance of Parcel B to GRVDF and the RVDC. (2) Allow the time period for reversion to the GRVDF and the RVDC to expire. Any development of the parcel, and perhaps the surrounding area, would be delayed until it automatically reverted to the corporations on November 24, 1991. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board authorize the County Administrator to execute a deed for reconveyance of Parcel B to the Greater Roanoke Valley Development Foundation and the Roanoke Valley Development Corporation. Respectfully submitted, V c ie L. H f an Assistant C my Attorney Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by Action Vote No Yes Abs Eddy Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers 2 ~a - / AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JULY 10, 1990 ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING RECONVEYANCE OF THE FORMER FIRE STATION SITE IN THE ROANOKE- BOTETOURT INDUSTRIAL PARK TO GREATER ROANOKE VALLEY DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION AND ROANOKE VALLEY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION WHEREAS, a certain parcel of real estate located in Botetourt County, Virginia, was deeded to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, and the Board of Supervisors of Botetourt County, Virginia, for the specified purpose of constructing a fire station; and, WHEREAS, the donation of said parcel to the Counties was subject to the condition that the property would revert to the Grantors in the event that the Counties had not appropriated funds for and had not begun construction of afire station on the parcel within five years, namely by November 24, 1991; and, WHEREAS, the Counties have reached an agreement to construct the joint fire station on a different parcel of land and the subject parcel will not be used for the specified purpose. THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter, the acquisition and disposition of real estate can be authorized only by ordinance. A first reading of this ordinance was held on July 10, 1990; and a second reading was held on July 24, 1990; and, 2. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.01 of the Charter of Roanoke County, the remaining rights in the subject ~.7 .--- parcel of real estate are hereby declared to be surplus and the condition applicable to the property renders it unacceptable and unavailable for other public uses; and, 3. That reconveyance of the subject parcel, described as Parcel B, consisting of 2.183 acres, located to the north of Route 460 in the Roanoke-Botetourt Industrial Park, in the Bonsack area of the Blue Ridge District, County of Botetourt, Virginia, to the Greater Roanoke Valley Development Foundation and the Roanoke Valley Development Corporation, is hereby authorized. 4. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized to execute such documents and take such actions as may be necessary to accomplish this conveyance, all of which shall be on form approved by the County Attorney. 2 . _ ~ ~ ATTa CN MF IYT ~,A_ . eon-~ ~~~~ ~,~ ~ 611- __- . ~~.~~o, ~_~ ~°'a~ XEMAINlNC~ Paov~atr of pa ~~ti0~ C7KfATER ROANOKE VAGGfI' nFVfGOPh1ENt FOUNDATION P~Y,npOp~,'~ ANO lyE .POANOkE VALLEY OEVEGOPMENt GoaaoRgtlOrY ~, gyp p~ • / D, ~. 279 P4.396 (90l" G0.) 4.9. 1p 99 !'!S. 677 (Rrcf. cp,~ \p~~ p\\, ~ / 0.9..1046 P4. 177 (RK~. Go.) ~l`Qa0 o~yp p ~ 5 N ago /0' 091"E.~ 429.11' fF( t.P. ~ 6 V v, `Srt ! P j:• ~ ~ ~: ' :s a- NEW PARGEC "G}" ~~ e°O Z.l83 AG. ~ 7 ¢~ tV q' h ~ C ~ EW ~1V1510N L1NE ~ 7A ~ ~' a' 3A 599r - 8 ~Q:•~~ °W n ~ a ~<~~ . ~ ~` NEW PARGEG'i~" 641'92.0„E q z~ow~ ~r a ~~ ?.17? AC. SO.f4' `~' "a ~ 10 ~~ Exi311~~~ /~ ts ftt 1 R E 0 8~ 56 ti d1, ~49b:85 / t17• , . . fAf l.~!-- y2 ~ ~G NZ6'h~ .~ -- 545'3'43"W, 404.51' I T NONU":E t o0' r o g ' N. 54 ~ 5 . ~'. '~ ~~ M6k Z ~ 6aR '~d 9E R ~a GuavE "~i° ~ '-` ' ' 'a~~ d *~ 71'! X AST u•~ Rio4~ ~zro ' 3 /7 ; u ~ R~VT~ t m qB. 1:5 . .t rc ooa ~ Yq. SAG. RIE. , GURVf `A~/" R 475,00' T R 9.oq' ~: GN.h.: N Z7'SO'05"y}, R - 4?5.04' TOTAL AREA = A. 345 AG, A a 18.14' GuavE "9" NOTE: GX, /x.14' d a ?4' ~9 l4° TN;~. N 16 14'0/"W I 9~~l~fnN OO7NRl/ l~S S ~OR'4•PROPERTYA 551 f ® l (4 3 AC. TOTAL) A S 7?. 68' ~ O1V/S/pN (lNf OF CH ?!0 91' GNg, a N7B'~4'16'w GREATER ROANOKE VALLEY DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION 8 THE ROANOKE VALLEY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION o '~~ • p BEING SUBDIYIDED INTO ' ~' - L ~ NEW PARCELS A AND B ~' ~ ~ ~'° ~1 E SITUATED ALONG U. S. RTE N4b0 ~~~~ ~~' YALLEY !4AG l STER I AL DISTRICT 30h'f q ~}( -~ 660 BOTETO ' yf 0~ URT COUNTY, YIRGIHIA ~ • ,~' VINCENT K ~' $ LUM~S EN ~' f0J '~` GJ~~~"`N~ ~ sc~~e: I•• ~ 1001 o~TE: 30 APRiI 1986 o. i 1461 & 1428 ' BUFORD T.'LU1b18DEN 8 A880CIATE&, P. C. GOGATl~N MAp ~~ $ORV~O~' ENGINEERS-SURVEYORS bCAGf I "; ? Ml[A~ ROAMOKE, VIRGINIA -. ~. r... _ \. COMM. ~- BG-l:IH Z I~-1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, JULY 10, 1990 ORDINANCE 71090-5 TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF APPROXIMATELY 1.25 ACRES OF A 2.56-ACRE PARCEL OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED ON HARDY ROAD APPROXIMATELY 0.4 MILE WEST OF FEATHER ROAD (STATE ROUTE 654) (TAX MAP NO. 71.07-1-41) IN THE VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF R-1 TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF B-2 WITH CONDITIONS UPON THE APPLICATION OF HENRY J. BRABHAM IV WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on June 12, 1990, and the second reading and public hearing was held June 26, 1990; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on June 5. 1990; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing approximately 1.25 acres of a 2.56-acre parcel of real estate, as described herein, and located on Hardy Road approximately 0.4 mile west of Feather Road (State Route 654), (Tax Map Number 71.07-1-41) in the Vinton Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of R-l, Single Family Residential District, to the zoning classification of B-2, General Commercial District. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of Henry J. Brabham IV. 3. That the owner has voluntarily proffered in writing the ,. following conditions which the Board of Supervisors hereby accepts: a) The property shall only be used for a convenience store with gas service. b) The petitioner will provide type D screening and buffering along the property boundaries with adjacent residential use. c) The concept plan dated May 22, 1990, is proffered. d) Hours of operation will be Sunday through Saturday, 6 a.m. to 11 p.m. 4. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: BEGINNING at an old iron pin on the northeasterly right-of-way of Virginia Secondary Route 634 (Hardy Road); thence N. 18 deg. 45' 26" E. for a distance of 300 feet to a point; thence S. 59 deg. 53' 26" E. for a distance of 153.16 feet to a point; thence S. 15 deg. 15' 12" W. for a distance of 325 feet to an old iron pipe; thence with a curve to the left following Virginia Secondary Route 634, the chord of which is N. 53 deg. 27' 28" W. and which was an arc of 178.62 feet to the point of beginning and consisting of 1.143 acres. 5. That the effective date of this ordinance shall be '_-~---July 10 , 19 9 0 . On motion of Supervisor Nickens to approve ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: Supervisor Eddy A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Development & Inspections Terry Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning John Willey, Director, Real Estate Assessment 1 I i ~, .. ~ i PETITIONER: HENRY J. BRABHAM, IV "~~ ? `~ ` `# CASE NUMBER: 19-5/90 _ ~ ~ /' Planning Commission Hearing Date: June 5, 1990 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: June 26, 1990 A. REQUEST Petition of Henry J. Brabham, IV to conditionally rezone approximately 1.25 acres of a 2.56 acre parcel from R-1 to B- 2 to construct a convenience store with gas pumps, located on Hardy Road, approximately 0.4 mile west of Feather Road (SR 654), Vinton Magisterial District. B. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION There was no opposition to the request. C. SIGNIFICANT IMPACT FACTORS 1) Surrounding Land: Most of the land surrounding this site is zoned and used for single-family residences. The petitioner proposes to keep his existing building on the adjacent prop- erty to use for an undetermined commercial use. There is an existing, small warehouse to the northwest of this site. A large tract of land, the McDonald farm, is across Hardy Road from this site. 2) Neighboring Area: This site is bordered to the north by large lot residential development and is in close proximity to Montgomery Village and Crofton subdivisions. 3) Street Capacities: Route 634 (Hardy Road) is a secondary road in the VDOT system. Route 634 from the Town of Vinton limits to Finney Drive (entrance to Montgomery Village) had a 1989 average daily traffic count of 11,615 vehicles per day. Route 634, from Finney Drive to the Blue Ridge Parkway, had a 1989 average daily traffic count of 5,500 vehicles per day. There are no immediate plans to widen Route 634. The Institute of Traffic Engineers estimates, from a limited sample, that a convenience market of the size proposed by pe- titioner would generate an additional 4,500 vehicles per day. There were 4 accidents reported in 1987, in the vicinity of this parcel of land. 4) Circulation: Although petitioner has submitted and proffered a concept plan that meets minimum County requirements for parking, the majority of this parking is behind the proposed building. Due to the relatively narrow width of this site (179 feet) and the large size of the proposed store (5,000 sq.ft.), traffic circulation on-site could be problematic. 1 . ' ' r _;f F~ ~S D. PROFFERED CONDITIONS /~/-~ 1) The property shall only be used for a convenience store with gas service. 2) The petitioner will provide type D screening and buffering along the property boundaries with adjacent residential use. 3) The concept plan dated May 22, 1990, is proffered. 4) Hours of operation will be Sunday through Saturday, 6 a.m. to 11 p.m. E. COMMISSIONER~B MOTION, VOTE AND REASON Mr. Robinson approve moved to approve the petition with proffered conditions. The motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Witt, Robinson, Massey, Winstead, Gordon NAYS: None ABSENT: None F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE None. ,,,- G. ATTACHMENTS: Concept Plan V Vicinity Map ,~ Staff Report Other Terrance Harrington Secretary Roanoke County Pla Wing Commission 2 ,: ~ ~~-~~ Date: May 29, 1990 Tc: Planning Commission Frcm: Janet Scheic~~~t~"'f~ Re: Rezoning Petition of Henry J. Brabham, i~ Vinton Magisterial District The above petition, continued from May 1, is on your agenda fer the June S public hearing. At the May 1 hearing, staff agreed to work with the petitioner to improve both the ccncept plan and tNe wording of proffers. I have met with the petitioner"s attorne~% Mr. Bruce Mayer. He has submitted a new concept plan, dated May ~2. 1990, which does meet minimum County requirements for parking and aisle widths. Mr. Mayer has also submitted a revised list of proffers. At the May 1 hearing, Mr. Mayer proffered to close access from Hardy Read, to the adjacent site owned by Mr. Brabham. Since this ce~,stituted an off-site proffer it could not be acc-~ted. I have wcrk.ed with Mr. Mayer on re-wording this proffer, but although Mr. Brabham is agreeable to close this access, we could not arrive at a mutually agreeable and in the long term. legally enforceable way tc word such a proffer. Although petitioner has submitted and proffered a concept plan that meets minimum County requirements for parking, the majority o` this parking is behind the proposed building. Due to the relatively narrow width of this site (179 feet) and the large size of the proposed store (5000 square feet) traffic circulation on- site could be problematic. Although these site design specifics are important, the larger issues seem to be compatibility with the Comprehensive Plan and future plans for this stretch of Hardy Road in light of the proposed Explore Project and development towards Smith Mountain Lake. If the Explore Project does become a reality, access will be limited to the proposed Roanoke River Parkway via the Blue Ridge Parkway. The Explore Master Plan specifically states that there will not be access from Hardy Road to the Explore Project facilities. The Blue Ridge Parkway does not intersect Hardy Road, therefore, Explore traffic will generally not use Hardy Road. This area is appropriately designated Development in the Comprehensive Plan and is bordered by Neighborhood Conservation to the west and Core to the East. Faced with this designation, the access issues, and the generally low- to middle-density residential nature of the area, the Commission should consider what type of development does the community and the County want to encourage along this route? ~-i It is the opinion of the staff rhat the approval of this request for commercial zoning along Hard;- <<c.~~f := inconsistent with the adopted Comprehensive Plan and, if ~~~~-c,e~, sets the stage for acditional commercial requests alono •-ar, -=mad. Given that E<olore related traffic will not a-e ~-.=r-~~ =_,d ror access, we believe that opening up this section `- -_ --,ad for commercial development is premature. and is not _- she Ce=~ interests of the residents of the County. I have enclosed copies of the proT'ers, co~-_ept plan dated May• cc, 1990 and the staff report presented at r_he May 1 public hearing. The staff report has not beer. revise. ~~ f-/- / STAFF REPORT CASE NUMBER: 19-5i90 REVIEWED BY: Janet Scheid 1. NATURE OF REQUEST PETITIONER: Henry J. Brabham, ~~, DATE: April 26, 1990 a. This is a conditional request to rezone approximateiv 1.~5 acres, of a 2.56 acre parcel, from Residential (R-1) to General Commercial (B-2) for the purpose of constructing a convenience store with gas pumps. b. The petitioner, Mr. Brabham, has a legal contract on the entire parcel of land (2.56 acres) owned by Mr. riaynard Holdren. Mr. Brabham currently operates the LancerMart convenience store on the adjacent property but plans to cease his operation there if he constructs a new store. He does plan to operate some form ofi commercial or service business on this adjacent property. 2. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS a. The B-2 General Commercial District allows a wide variety of commercial uses. The petitioner has proffered to only operate a convenience store with gas pumps on this parcel. b. The screening and bufifering regulations of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance (Section 21-92) will apply to the development of this parcel of land. The land is bordered on the north and eastern sides by R-1. c. Site plan review will be required for any future development on this site to ensure compliance with all County regulations. d. Stormwater control regulations will be applied. 3. SITE CHARACTERISTICS a. Topography: This parcel of land is relatively flat. b. Ground Cover: This parcel is mostly grass with a few moderately sized trees. c. There are no improvements on this property. 4. AREA CHARACTERISTICS a. Future Growth Priority: Situated within Vinton Community Planning Area. The initiative, stated in the Roanoke County Land Use Plan, is to stabilize growth in this area. 1 ~, y-/ b. General area: The area surroundine this parcel is predominately residential. The adjace~:t pr,~ ;erty, where the LancerMart is currently operating, is ~ ~~~ed B-2 and there is a small warehouse behind th_s paw^el which is zoned M-1. All the other land. east on --arty "--mad and west to the Town limits, is single-family re=__denti~i. the large tract across Hardy Road from this si _= is -r-e i~icDonald Farm, zoned R-E and owned by the Town ~~ Vinr~n, The Blue Ridge Parkway crosses Hardy Road apprc:<imatGi/ ~_~.~ mile east of this site. 5. LAND USE IMPACT ASSESSMENT Rating: Rate each factor according to the impact of the proposed action. Use a scale of 1 through ~. 1 = positive impact, 2 = negligible impac*_. ~ _ ~T;anageable impact, 4 = disruptive impact, 5 = severe i^pact, and N/A = not applicable. RATING FACTOR COMMENTS LAND USE COMPATIBILITY 3 a. Comprehensive Plan: 1985 Comprehensive Deve:opment Plan has placed this area within the Development designation. This designation encourages parks, outdoor recreation. and low to moderate density residential de•~elopment. (he land use types cited as being desirable within the Development designation do not include any commercial activities with the exception of limited uses within a planned community development. The petitioner has submitted a land use plan amendment to change the designation of this parcel to Transition. The Transition designation encourages middle to high density residential development along with institutional and office uses. Among the land use types that is cited as being desirable within this designation is retail uses if clustered or within a planned shopping center. The land use factors that determine which areas should be designated as Transition are as follows: (1) Locations that have direct frontage and access to an arterial or major collector street - this parcel fronts on Route 634 (Hardy Road), which due to its high traffic count is considered an arterial road. (2) Locations where strip development has occurred or where future development pressures may cause such a pattern to occur. Hardy Road, through the Town of Vinton to the County boundary, has some strip development along its borders. A new office building is being constructed across from Hardy Road Elementary School and a retail convenience store is located just west of the County boundary approximately 0.5 mile from the petitioner's site. The petitioner's site is located within 2 y H- / the general area of the proposed Ezolore Park.. (3) Locations where strip commerr-lal ~oninq has been instituted. The strip along Hard; ~~'cr.~ is predominately zoned residential. (4; Location. ~.ti~-_.h are physically oriented toward the major fro~,•taq~ _--~~et. This site fronts on Route 6,:,4 (Hardy Road, ~ Si Locations within the projected urban service area. This -_*.e is within the Roanoke County urban service limit b~_,~ will be provided water and sewer service from tr,e Town c` ~Jinton. 4 4 4 3 b. Surrounding Land: Most of the land surrounding this site is zoned and used for sinq_le-family residences. The petitioner proposes to keep his existing building on the adjacent property to ease for an undetermined commercial use. There is an existing, small warehouse to the northwest of this site. A large tract ofi land, the McDonald Farm, is across Hardy Road fircm this site. c. Neighboring Area: This site is bordered to the north by large lot residential development and is in close proximity to Montgomery Village and Crofton subdivisions. d. Site Layout: The required concept plan nas been submitted. Preliminary review of the concept plan indicates that petitioner will be required to have approximately 28 parking spaces, two of which will be spaces for the handicapped. The concept plan only shows 12 spaces. The petitioner will be required to comply with Type D screening and buffering on the eastern, northern and northwestern borders, which at a minimum, requires a 25' buffer yard. Due to the width of this site, the petitioner may need to reconsider the size of his proposed store and/or the placement of the gasoline pump island in order to accommodate parking spaces and traffic circulation on site. e. Architecture: Petitioner has submitted some reproductions of architectural sketches for similar convenience stores with gas pumps. 3 f. Screening and Landscape: As stated above, petitioner will be required to comply with Type D screening and bufifering regulations on his boundaries with residential properties and with all other requirements of Section 21-92 of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance. 3 g. Amenities: The petitioner proposes to build a 5000 square feet convenience store with a gasoline island and a freestanding sign. 3 h. Natural Features: This site contains no known natural features. 3 I / -,( TRAFFIC 4 i. Street Capacities: Route 6.'4 (Hardy Road) is a secondary road in the VDOT syste,T:. no~.~tr, 634 from the Town of Vinton limits to Finney Drive ~.e~}t~an~.~ to flontgomery Village) had a 1989 average daily traffic i-nt~nt of ll,bi5 vehicles per day. Route b34, from Finney Drive to the Blue Ridge Parkway, had a 1989 average daily traffic count of 5,500 vehicles per day. There are no immediate plans to widen Route 634. The Institute of Traffic Engineers estimates, from a limited sample, that a convenience market, of the size proposed by the petitioner, would generate an additional 4,500 vehicles per day. There were 4 accidents reported, in 1987, in the vicinity of this parcel of la~~d. 4 j. Circulation: As stated earlier in the site layout discussion. the petitioner will have to expand the parking facilities shown on tre concept plan to include 28 spaces with adequate travel aisles. It may be necessary for the petitioner to reconsider the site layout of the store and/or the gasoline island to adequately accommodate a safe traffic circulation pattern. UTILITIES .. k. Water and Sewer: In a letter dated April 11, 1990, Mr. George Nester, Town Manager of Vinton. advised that the Town would be providing water and sewer service to this site. DRAINAGE 1. Basin: This site is in the Wolfi Creek drainage basin. 3 m. Floodplain: This site is not in the 100-year floodplain. PUBLIC SERVICES 3 n. Fire and Rescue Services: Can be provided. N/A o. Parks and Recreation: No effect. P~/A p. Schools: No effect. TAX BASE 3 q. -Land and Improvement Value: Unknown -Taxable Gross Sales/Year: Unknown 4 v .~/- ~ -Total Employees: 1 -Total revenue to the County/Y'ear: Unknown ENVIRONMENT 3 r. Air: Unknown effect. 3 s. Water: Unknown eftert. 3 t. Soils: Unknown efter_t. 3 u. Noise: Unknown effect. 3 v. Signage: Must comply with adopted sign ordinance. 6. PLAN CONSISTENCY This area is designated as Development. Petitioner has filed a land use plan amendment to change the designation to Transition. A retail convenience store is more appropriate in Transition than in Develot~ment. Given the nature and character of the surrounding ar-ea it was not deemed appropriate to change the designation to Core. 7. STAFF EVALUATIGN a. Strengths: (1) The petitioner is requesting to only rezone approximately 1.15 acres of this parcel to B-2 rather than the entire parcel. The remainder of the parcel will continue to be zoned R-i. (2) Petitioner has proffered to limit use of this property to a convenience store with gasoline pumps. b. Weaknesses: (1) Traffic on Route 6~4 is currently heavy. The proposal could exacerbate this traffic congestion problem. There are no imminent plans by VDOT to widen this road. (2) The petitioner's concept plan does not include the required number of parking spaces and may need to be significantly altered to accommodate both parking facilities and traffic circulation. c. Proffers Suggested: (1) Petitioner should proffer to abide by Type D screening and buffering requirements along property boundaries with residential uses. (2) Petitioner should proffer to close off the existing access to the adjacent convenience store property and utilize the controlled access from the new convenience store site for both businesses. S ~~ ~' e i 1 ~,/ PROFFER OF CONDITIONS for Request of Rezoning From R1 to B2 of a 1.143 acre tract of land located on Hardy Road. 1. The property shall only be used for a convenience store with gas service. 2. The petitioner will provide type D screening and buffering along the property boundaries with adjacent residential use. 3. The Concept Plan dated May 22, 1990, is proffered. 4. Hours of operation will be Sunday through Saturday 6:00 A.M. - 11:00 P.M. Hen~J : BrabhamF; by his attorney, ruce E. Mayer a . ~~ ~~ P~P~T~ f H •.! ~ I~NF,p 5-2 ,, ~~ h 0 ~t~ ~ J 0~ ,• 'y~~ ~-~~ -- ' - 1 ~I C ~opL~ o~ M.~ Ho-.c~t-~ ~~~ a-~ -~ v5t~ _~ ti ~~ l ` r' ~/- 2p ~ I ~~QGf ~~ 1 Za~a~l1 ~NGb ~jc~~ ~Sa.. ~, .._ ~T ~ ICS ~o' ~ (1 ~' y4• h _~ - -. ~~~ ~, I'~iJ~~t05 r ~~ -_ ~ ~ so' I g ~. ~. E ~ •~, ~ ~ ~ i . ,~' Ate' ~°~f`i' ~~, ti~ ~ STD ~D ~' • s~, ~~o ~ . ,/ =- ~ ~ 1 ~~ - ~ f fat ~rrt Yt~ ~•~ ~s,1~~ p,~.~' • PP ~ 0C ~ ~. ~~ , ~~ t~ ;, ~ ~~ ` /~~~ , ~ ~ /~~` ~~'~ ~~ ~ ~VE~~~~.~+~ ~~~d ~ r,l~ a ~f7'~. ~ ~-T ~ P ~~ ~~ ~ !v }~l~}~ ~EEr! r ~~~~~ a F ~, ~, ~cm. ~~~a ~' ~' IA~y~ l~-(A,{ a~, t~,go ;~ i 2~,'0`~' f/-/ ~~~~~ ~/-/ ,- ~o ,~ .Q J •.nuao n 7 t,L fI1N0ATE APPRAIfAI AND WPPpO fERV10E +o~.es, rr~.u~ SAP RE VIf10Nf e~r~ ...en wrE .uiu~. c..ns~. - ~R MwE ~___~_~ i ~. ,~--/- ~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, JULY 10, 1990 ORDINANCE TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF APPROXIMATELY 1.25 ACRES OF A 2.56-ACRE PARCEL OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED ON HARDY ROAD APPROXIMATELY 0.4 MILE WEST OF FEATHER ROAD (STATE ROUTE 654) (TAX MAP NO. 71.07-1-41) IN THE VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF R-1 TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF B-2 WITH CONDITIONS UPON THE APPLICATION OF HENRY J. BRABHAM IV WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on June 12, 1990, and the second reading and public hearing was held June 26, 1990; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on June 5. 1990; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing approximately 1.25 acres of a 2.56-acre parcel of real estate, as described herein, and located on Hardy Road approximately 0.4 mile west of Feather Road (State Route 654), (Tax Map Number 71.07-1-41) in the Vinton Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of R-1, Single Family Residential District, to the zoning classification of B-2, General Commercial District. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of Henry J. Brabham IV. 3. That the owner has voluntarily proffered in writing the /L'~ " following conditions which the Board of Supervisors hereby accepts: a) The property shall only be used for a convenience store with gas service. b) The petitioner will provide type D screening and buffering along the property boundaries with adjacent residential use. c) The concept plan dated May 22, 1990, is proffered. d) Hours of operation will be Sunday through Saturday, 6 a.m. to 11 p.m. 4. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: BEGINNING at an old iron pin on the northeasterly right-of-way of Virginia Secondary Route 634 (Hardy Road); thence N. 18 deg. 45' 26" E. for a distance of 300 feet to a point; thence S. 59 deg. 53' 26" E. for a distance of 153.16 feet to a point; thence S. 15 deg. 15' 12" W. for a distance of 325 feet to an old iron pipe; thence with a curve to the left following Virginia Secondary Route 634, the chord of which is N. 53 deg. 27' 28" W. and which was an arc of 178.62 feet to the point of beginning and consisting of 1.143 acres. 5. That the effective date of this ordinance shall be June 26, 1990. ~jIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII~J _ - _ _ E _ _ PEARANCE RE VEST _ AP Q _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ^~ _ _ _ AGENDA ITEM NO. _ - _ SUBJECT (.3 ~~ ~ ~ A ~ ~' r 2 v -.~ ~ ~~ _ _ - I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supex~tisors to recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter = HEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, so that I ma comment.W _ I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES __ LISTED BELOW. • Each s esker will be iven between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to __ do otherwise. • S eskers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Ques- __ t ons of cl ' 'cation may be entertained by the Chairman. • All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. • Both s eskers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all tunes. __ p • Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments - with the clerk. • • INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FQR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT a_ THEM. i RINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO DEPUTY CLERK _ PLEASE P _ 2 _ u .NAME I~ ~ ~' ~' ~`/ ~ ~ _ _ __ _ ~, ~ x = ADDRESS _ _ _ _ PHONE ~ ~'(~ ~ 3~ ~~ mlllllilllillillllilllllllllllllillillllllll IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIilllllililllllillllllllllllllliillllllllillllllllllllllllllllllil ACTION NUMBER A-71090-6 ITEM NUMBER Z~ '" -~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: July 10, 1990 SUBJECT: Appointments to Committees, Commissions and Boards COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: 1. Board of Zoning Appeals Five-year term of M. E. Maxey, Vinton Magisterial District expired June 30, 1990. 2. Buildina Code Board of Adjustments and Appeals Four year terms of Larry Lester, Alternate and John Brownlee, Alternate will expire July 25, 1990 3. Community Corrections Resources Board One-year term of Edmund J. Kielty, Alternate. His term expired August 13, 1988. 4. Landfill Citizens Advisory Committee Carl L. Wright, representative from 'the Cave Spring Magisterial District has resigned and another representative should be appointed. 5. Leaaue of Older Americans Board of Directors A vacancy has occurred on the League of Older Directors as a result of the death of Roanoke representative, Matthew Banks. The League of suggested that Murry White be appointed to fi unexpired term which ends in March 1991. Mr. serves on the LOA Advisory Board. Please see for further information. Americans Board of County's Older Americans has 11 Mr. Banks' White currently the attached letter ~.~ -. SUBMITTED BY: Mary H. Allen Clerk to the Board APPROVED BY: ~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved (x) Motion by: Bob L. Johnson No Yes Abs Denied ( ) nominated Larry Lester to anotheEddy x Received ( ) 1-arm as Alternate for Building Johnson x Referred ( ) Code Board of Adj..ustments & McGraw x To ( ) Appeals: Steven A. McGraw Nickens x nominated Murry K. White to Robers x League of Older American Board of Directors; the above people were appointed to serve by unanimous recorded vote cc: File Building Code Board of Adjustments & Appeals File League of Older Americans Board of Directors File . EAGUE ~ ~ ~ o OLDER Area Agency AMERICANS , ® ~ on Aging Z- 706 CAMPBELL AVENUE, S. W. P.O. BOX 14205 ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24038 TELEPHONE (703) 345-0451 FAX (703) 981-1487 July 3, 1990 Mr. Richard W. Robers, Chairman Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Roanoke County Administration Center P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 Dear Mr. Robers: The League of Older Americans would like to request that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors recommend a replacement for Matthew Banks, LOA Board member who died June 29, 1990. Mr. Banks served with distinction on the LOA Board for nearly six years. Prior to that he had been Roanoke County's appointee to the LOA Advisory Council. We will certainly miss him. It is the custom of the LOA to ask for the Board of Supervisors to recommend a nominee to our Board of Directors. With that in mind, we would like to suggest that Murry A. White be considered for nomination by the Supervisors for election to our Board to fill Mr. Banks' unexpired term which ends in March 1991. If elected, Mr. White would be eligible for 2 three year terms. Mr. White has been a member of the League's Advisory Council for nearly 6 years and chairman for the past 3 years. He is currently Roanoke County's representative to the Advisory Council and attends LOA Board meetings, ex officio. Having someone who knows and understands. our procedures would be a definite asset. If possible we would like to receive an official nomination before our next Board of Directors meeting on July 23, 1990. Sincerely, ~- Prentiss A. Webb President cc: Steve McGraw ,Elmer Hodge Susan Williams SERVING VIRGINIA'S FIFTH PLANNING DISTRICT ACTION NO. A-71090-6.a ITEM NUMBER -~ -' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: July 10, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: Appointment to Cable TV Negotiating Committee COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION The current contract with Cox Cable expires on December 31, 1990. The Roanoke Valley Cablevision Committee has received the consultant's report. The consultant has made several recommended changes to the contract including a government access channel for schools and local governments and a reduction of the density requirements from 30 houses per mile to 10 houses per mile. The Cablevision Committee has recommended that a negotiating committee be established to negotiate the new contract with Cox Cable, with a representative from each local government. Supervisor Steve McGraw has expressed a desire to serve on this committee. RECOMMENDATION' It is recommended that Supervisor Steve McGraw be appointed by the Board of Supervisors to serve on the Cable TV Negotiating Committee. Elmer C. Hodge' County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- - ACTION VOTE Approved (X) Motion by: Fich3rcl w RnharG No Yes Abs Denied ( ) nominated Steven A. McGraw% Eddy x Received ( ) Supervisor McGraw was appointed Johnson x Referred ( ) to serve b y unanimous recorded McGraw x To ( ) vote Nickens x Robers x cc: File Regional Cablevision Committee Regional Cablevision Committee File AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JULY 10, 1990 RESOLUTION 71090-7 APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM K - CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. that the certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for July 10, 1990 designated as Item K Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved•and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Item 1 as follows: 1. Approval of Minutes - June 12, 1990 2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this resolution. On motion of Supervisor Robers, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None • A COPY TESTE: `-~y~~_ o ' ~' Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors CC: File June 12 , 1990 4 ~ 3 Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Roanoke County Administration Center 3738 Brambleton Avenue, SW Roanoke, Virginia 24018 June 12, 1990 The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, met this day at the Roanoke County Administration Center, this being the second Tuesday, and the first regularly scheduled meeting of the month of June, 1990. IN RE: CALL TO ORDER Chairman Robers called the meeting to order at 3:05 p.m. The roll call was taken. MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Richard Robers, Vice Chairman Steven A. McGraw, Supervisors Lee 8. Eddy, Bob L. Johnson, MEMBERS ABSENT: Supervisor Harry C. Nickens STAFF PRESENT: Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator; John M. Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator for Human Services; John R. Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator of Community Services and Development; Don M. Myers, Assistant County Administrator for Management -" Services; Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney, June 12, 1990 415 men o ocia ervices. ~ introduction of new Police Cbiet County Administrator Elmer Hodge introduced the new Police Chief John Cease, who will begin his duties on July 1, 1990. ~ Announcement of NACO Achievement Awards Mr. Hodge announced that Roanoke County has been notified that it is the recipient of four National Association of Counties Achievement Awards. Tom Walls, Social Services was present to explain the Mediation Services; Anne Marie Green, Information Officer described Roanoke County Today, Assistant County Administrator John Hubbard outlined the Landfill Citizens Advisory Committee process for the new landfill and, Assistant County Administrator John Chambliss described the CHIP Program for the Health Department. All four programs were honored by NACO. IN RE: WORK SESSION 1. Work Session on the Spring Hollow Reservoir and authorization to uroceed with a rate and feasibility study. A-61290-1 Mr. Hodge introduced those individuals who would be making the presentation and described the process that will be followed to go forward with the project. Assistant County Administrator John Hubbard explained that the reservoir is the major part of the project but includes June 12, 2990 4 ~ 1 e ivi e e weep two bond issues; $15 million of general obligation debt approved in a 1986 bond referendum and $38,685,000 in revenue bonds. To pay for the debt service, staff is studying a combination of consumer utility tax, water rate increases and connection fee increases. Jim Johnson, Wheat First Securities, advised that the first step in the funding process should be a rate and feasibility consultant review. He presented a booklet that included financing options, a suggested financing timetable and nine alternative financing structures. Supervisor Johnson asked if the project could be financed under the Roanoke County Resource Authority. Mr. Johnson responded that they had not considered that option. Supervisor Johnson asked that this option be included in the financing plan. In response to a question from Supervisor Eddy regarding projected water needs for the County, John Hubbard responded with projections based on five-year increments. Mr. Mahoney responded to another question from Supervisor Eddy that there is no limit on General Obligation Bonds provided the voters approve such a bond. Supervisor Eddy advised that he felt that the County should only use revenue from water rates not sewer rates and also requested that the rate and feasibility study include connection fees in addition to water and sewer rates. Mr. Hodge advised that this would be included as well as funding for water and sewer projects. June 12, 1990 419 Supervisor Johnson movedapprove the staff recommendation. The motion was carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Robers NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens ~ Autborisation to fund well drilling for the Arlington Hills subdivision. A-61290-3 Mr. Craig reported that the Virginia Department of Transportation had acquired Arlington Hills #2 well by eminent domain as part of the reconstruction of Route 221 at a cost of $57,203 and this acquisition encroaches within the required buffer to receive a permit to operate the Arlington Hills #4 well costing $50,657. Staff recommended that the money received from VDOT be placed in the existing well drilling account to be used to drill and develop additional wells in that area. Mr. Craig responded to a question from Supervisor Eddy that the staff would coordinate with the School Board on selection of the site since it will be on their property. Supervisor Robers moved to approve the staff recommendation. The motion was carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Robers NAYS: None June 12, 1990 4 2 legal expenses related to APCO negotiations. A-61290-5 THere was no discussion of this issue. Supervisor McGraw moved to approve the assessment. The motion was carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Robers NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens S. Amendments to proposed Consolidation Agreement Supervisor Eddy advised he had reviewed the information from Mr. Mahoney regarding consolidation and asked if the legal notice could include specific language describing the expanded area for a second vote. Mr. Mahoney responded that the map was available in the Clerk's Office in both Roanoke City and Roanoke County, but he would contact the newspaper to change the legal notice. However, this change would increase the cost of the advertisement which was about $2,000 per ad. Supervisor Eddy withdrew his suggestion. IN RE: REQIIEBT FOR WORK SESSIONB Supervisor Eddy requested a work session with the Planning Commission. Planning Director Terry Harrington responded that this was discussed at the last commission meeting. The Planning Commission recommended •a retreat-type work session away from the offices in August. After further discussion with June 12, 1990 423 Following discussion, Supervisor Johnson moved to continue this item to June 26 and authorized the staff to resolve the problems with the Jones' and to clear up any misunderstandings. The motion was carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Robers NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens IN RE: FIRST READING OF ORDINANCEB ~ Ordinance amending and readopting Chapter 16 of the Roanoke County Code as Chatter 16A, Precious Metals and Gems. There was no discussion of this item and no one was present to speak to the ordinance. Supervisor McGraw moved to approve first reading of the ordinance. The motion was carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Robers NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens 2. Ordinance establishing a County Police Force for the County of Roanoke, Roanoke County Code, Chanter 16, Sections 1 - 18. Mr. Mahoney advised that there were additional minor changes to the ordinance regarding references to the County June 12, 1990 4 ~ 5 no discussion of this ordinance. Supervisor Robers moved to approve first reading of the ordinance. The motion was carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Robers NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens S. Ordinance amending the Roanoke County Code, Chapter 12, Motor Vehicles and Traffic, Article IIZ, of the Roanoke County Code, to prohibit parking in Fire Lanes. Mr. Mahoney presented the staff report. This ordinance will allow Roanoke County to enforce the regulation which has been difficult to enforce in the past. Supervisor McGraw suggested raising the fine to $50.00 similar to parking in handicapped areas. Mr. Mahoney responded he would have to go through a new first reading if the fine is changed. Supervisor McGraw moved to approve first reading of the ordinance and asked the staff to come back with a review and recommendation on all fines. The motion was carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Robers NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens s Ordinance amending Chapter 12. Motor vehicles and June 12, 1990 4 2 services for Develocment and Inspections. Planning and Zoninv. and repealing prior actions concerning same. 0-61290-6 Supervisor Eddy expressed concern that the large increase, higher than fees in surrounding localities, could discourage economic development. Mr. Hodge reviewed all the steps necessary in development and inspections and explained that these fees would recover the costs. Supervisor Eddy suggested that the staff monitor the time spent on projects to be able to compare it to the fees. Ms. Busher advised that the fee consultants met with the staff and studied the time spent on projects to determine the fees. Supervisors McGraw and Johnson felt that the fees were fair but may be burdensome on the small developer. Supervisor Eddy moved to adopt the ordinance with the understanding that a system will be developed to determine the time and costs as related to review process that would be brought back to the board within a year. The motion was carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Robers NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens ORDINANCE 61290-6 IMPOSING OR INCREASING CERTAIN FEES FOR SERVICES FOR DEVELOPMENT AND INSPECTIONS, PLANNING AND ZONING, AND REPEALING PRIOR ACTIONS CONCERNING SAME June 12, 1990 4 2 g (1950), as amended, authorizes the collection of fees to cover the costs of making inspections, issuing permits, advertising of notices and other expenses incident to the administration of a zoning ordinance or to the filing or processing of any appeal or amendment thereto; and WHEREAS, Section 15.1-29.14 of the Code of Virginia (1950), as amended, directs the advertising, public hearing, and enactment of certain fees and levies, said requirements having been satisfied as required by law; and WHEREAS, the first reading and public hearing on this ordinance was held on May 22, 1990, and the second reading on this ordinance was held on June 12, 1990. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That there is hereby established certain fees for public services provided by and through the Roanoke County Department of Development and Inspections relating to the review of subdivision plats and plans and similar development services rendered for and on behalf of citizens, as follows: Review Site Plans 5685 + S40 per acre Review Small Subdivisions 25 (less than 5 lots or parcelsl Review Large Subdivisions 5220 + S45 per lot or parcel Review Erosion/Sediment Control Plan 5100 + S100jper acre or portion thereof Subdivision waiver or variance 190 Vacation of subdivision plat and easements 150 June 12, 1990 4 3 1 4. That in addition to the fees established herein, the applicant shall be responsible for the payment of the full cost of any legal advertisement or publication costs which may be required by law. 5. That Resolution No. 2368, which was adopted by this Board on Auqust 14, 1979, and which established a schedule of fees for the review of preliminary and final subdivision plats, is hereby repealed. 6. That Resolution No. 82-213, which was adopted by this Board on November 22, 1983, and which established a schedule of fees for certain services for zoning matters, is hereby repealed. 7. That Resolution No. 84-96.q., which was adopted by this Board on June 12, 1984, and which established a fee for variance requests, is hereby repealed. 8. That Resolution No. 85-30 ,E, which was adopted by this Board on March 12, 1985, and which established a fee for conditional rezonings and subdivision waivers, is hereby repealed. 9. That Action No. A/2-i1-86-34, item F3, which was adopted by this Board on February 11, 1986, and which established a fee for administrative appeals to the Board of Zoning Appeals, is hereby repealed. 10. That the effective date of this ordinance and for the imposition of the fees and charges contained herein shall be July 1, 1990. On motion of Supervisor Eddy to adopt ordinance with June 12, 1990 4 3 3 second reading was held on June 12, 1990; and 3. That the new forty (40') foot easement for electric service runs along Harbourwood Road, then follows a more direct route across the subject property to the service area of the proposed development, said easement being located on the property owned by Roanoke County, known as Green Hill Park, and lying on the westerly side of Virginia Secondary Highway 639 (Harbourwood Road) in the Catawba Magisterial District; and 4. That the offer of Appalachian Power Company in the amount of One Dollar ($1.00) is hereby accepted and all other offers are rejected; and 5. That the proceeds from the sale of the easement are to be allocated to the capital reserves of Roanoke County; and 6. That the County administrator is authorized to execute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County as are necessary to accomplish the conveyance of said easement, all of which shall be upon form approved by the County Attorney. On motion of Supervisor Robers, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw,~Johnson, Robers NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens 4. Ordinance appropriating the fiscal year 1990-91 budget. June 12, 1990 BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the following appropriations are hereby made from the respective funds for the period beginning July 1, 1990, and ending June 30, 1991, for the functions and purposes indicated: CO0NT1 OP tO1N0IB, IIBGINI! PBOPOSBD tISC1L lBll 1!!0-l1 B0DCB1 JUNG 11, 1190 tt1BN0BS: 6BNBRIL iOMD DtBT POND i66,881,li3 C1PII/L POND _ 1,161,111 100TH H/1EN II POND 311,1SS BBCBB/LION tBE CL/SS FOND 331,31! IITBHN/L SBHYICBS POND 3S1,IS6 91ILITI POND 1,161,15! 0lPSITH PICILIfl PDND-YITBp 1,l66,1S1 OPPSITB t1CILITI POND-SBrBH 11,193 ClH1CB II PUMO 1lS,101 133,100 SOB-TOTIL 6BNBRl1 COONTI PONDS 1S,3S3,32O SCHOOL OPBBITINC POND SCHOOL CLPBiBHI/ POND i1,S13,162 SCHOOL PEDBtIL PBOGBIIS FUND 1,11!,000 SCHOOL 1BITB0Ot POND 1,Sl3,SII 136,834 SOB-TOTIL SCHOOL PONDS --i1,S11,621- TOTIL HBPBNUBS ILL PONDS 1152,!30,!!1 437 POILIC TWSPOlTl1I0M 10,200 10,200 IlMl6tltil UD IODGt1 12,111 !1,050 200 !!,lil tlSt IUi6tit11 11,200 1,010,211 1,131,111 PIOCOttltll StlrlCts 1!5,02! 23,130 i,lli !25,115 fIlt IDIIIIS11/TIOM SS,1i0 111,01! 203,111 Itl,lli OPHtl1IDIS 1,211,512 !11,511 11,000 1,1!2,!!1 SOPP0H1 Sil/IC1S 253,515 225,0!0 11,315 523,150 1060RQH fItB 4!,100 10,000 109,100 1060111tH 1tSC0t 101,16! 5,000 lll,li! t001IZ COII01IC11IOIS 3,000 3~Opp ISS1 CO IDIII•COIIOMIII SYCS 111,1!3 !1,500 (10,100) 11!,1!3 6BIBILL SilrICiS 1!1,113 2T,161 222,251 SOLIB IlS1t 1BPOSt COLLtC1I0M 113,110 163,001 2!6,116 1,!32,2!1 HBCICLII6 62, 000 12,000 IIGIIBBtIl6 t116I1BB1I16 213,115 11,211 (!1,514 ~ 135,041 D11P1I16 i 1BCOlDS !9,921 10,261 11,000 (39,151 11,121 COISTHDCIIOIIISPHCTIOI !11,114 1,361 IS,100 (51,130) 11,111 D11IM/6t 12,110 13!,211 1S,OOD 2)6,111 HO/DI/l 10,200 1,100 11,!00 S1HHB1 iI6t1I1G 123,111 123,111 IOILDII6 uIiTHt/ICt 293,!1! 525,521 20,215 (20,000) 11!,122 PLtIlI16120II16 lDIIIIS1HliI0I 215,121 11,111 IS,OS4 )51,060 ZOII16 OIDIILICt S3,i1! 1,000 S4,i12 PbUlI16 COIIISSI01 11,195 3,000 1l,1lS DBribOPIt11 1ID IISPHCTIOIS iDrilIS1l11I01 11,105 20,216 Oi,3l1 IISPHCIIOIS 211,111 11,29D 30,000 31!,031 OBIBLOPIBII LYYIt9 2l,OlS 100 3,100 32,115 ISSi CO IDIII-1DIll SB1rICHS l3,S1! 1,210 !00 102,119 sloolDS um®llct 61ooroS IlI1TH1111CH 131,111 261,115 21,214 !21,!25 Lilt WLLiCTIOI 15,502 33,150 ~ 4!,352 S11tE! SI6IS 4,200 4,200 PHIS /IB 1EC1111I0I COII1ifI11 tDDC/TI01 !1,153 l,09! !l,3S2 LHISOIt ICTI1ITItS 100,313 1,000 101,313 ODTD001 lDrtI101t 15,!41 0 45,!!1 SBIIOH CITIZtIS 11,129 1,000 11,12! SPBCI/L trtlTS 51,766 2,100 54,066 1B111PtO?ICS 12, 313 11,110 100,253 lDObf ITILt1ICS 10,732 1,000 11,332 lODT1 1TiLiTICS 111,326 10,000 IS~,32i IDIIIIS1111IOI 225,766 13,191 11,100 326,060 PDB1IC It11TI 111,131 411,131 SOCIIL SilT1CHS IDIIIIST1l1I0I 1,193,311 225,l3S 2,01!,)12 POBLIC ISSIS11ICt !16,136 !16,136 IMSTI1011011L Cllt 10,000 10,000 SDCIIL SB1rICt OIGIIIZlTIOIS 11,91! !1,114 CONTIiBOTIOIS S1C oIGIIIZeTIOIS 16,053 46,053 June 12, 1990 43 9 Il11GiNgT INtOINITION SiSTBNS IOriNiStutioN OPBUTIOMS i1S,i1S 13,f0o 1Sl,2lS IBRLOPNBNt 1!,231 231,512 115,100 1 100 13,1!1 100 105,211 313,I1S BND OSt! 12,211 , 11,350 21i,31t Sl ili CONNUNIC/TIOMS 221,J11 lli,lS! 1,150 , 731,1!1 1,Ii1,1S1 OTILIfl tOND •--------..'- DTILITI TILLING COLLICTIONS NBTBB BB/DIMG 103,!92 l1,1l1 5,000 201,133 DTILITI 53,331 !,021 2,000 11,361 IDNINISTY/TION f/TBt OPBYITIONS 1!0,161 Ii,S1S 2,110 - 23!,!22 IITBY N/IN1BN/NCB 391,590 21!,011 I,S11,119 312,150 31,000 100 360 1,!1!,13! SBUBA OPBYITIONS SBIIBI N/IITBNINCB 9S,9S1 1,011,31! , i21,2S1 1,111,301 SINITtt1 SBYBB BYILDITION 211,293 329,311 li2,S01 152 02! II,d00 31 500 111,101 NON-DBPIITNBNTIL-11TBB MOH-OBPUTNBNTIL-SBUBB , 1,!13,114 , Sll,t10 136,652 1,110,136 !,!!1,111 136,650 1,513,131 1,If6,1Si OPPSITB t/CIIITIlS tDND-i/TBB 11,193 11,1!3 OPPSIit P/CILITIBS tDNO-SBYBB I9S,101 1lS,101 61Y1GE II 1DND 233,100 233,100 SOB-1'Oi1L 6BNB1t/L COUNTY tDIDS idS,3S3,320 SCBOOL OPBYITINC tUND SCHOOL C1tBTHYII tOND i62,Sl3,262 SCHOOL tBDBY1L PYOGRINS FUND 2,121,000 SCBOOL TBITBOOI tOND 1,Sl3,S21 136,131 SDB-TOTIL SCHOOL PDNDS s61,S11,i21 10T/L BjPBNDIIDABS ILL FUNDS ~IS2,l30,lI1- 441 June 12, 1990 ~ ordinance to increase the salaries of the members of the Board of supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, Pursuant to Section 3.07 of the Roanoke County Charter and Section 14.1- 46.01:1 of the code of Virginia. 0-61290-9 There was no discussion of this ordinance. Supervisor McGraw moved to adopt the ordinance. The motion was carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Robers NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens ORDINANCE 61290-9 TO INCRHASE THE BALARIEB OF THE MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF 8II8ERVISORB OF ROANORE COUNTY PIIRSIIANT TO BECTION 3.07 OF THE ROANORE COIINTY CHARTER AND SECTION 14.1- 46.01:1 OF THE CODE OF VIRGINIA WHEREAS, Section 3.07 of the Charter of the County of Roanoke provides for the compensation of members of the Board of Supervisors and the procedure for increasing their salaries; and WHEREAS, Section 14.1-46.01:1 of the Code of Virginia (1950), as amended, establishes the annual salaries of members of boards of supervisors within certain population brackets; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, has heretofore established the annual salaries of Board members to be $8,805 by Ordinance 61489-13 and further, has established the additional annual compensation for the chairman June 12, 1990 ~ ~ 3 IN RE: APPOINTMENTS ,~ Community Corrections Resources Board Supervisor Eddy nominated Bernard Hairston to complete a one-year term from August 13, 1989 to August 13, 1990 and a new term beginning August 13, 1990 and expiring August 13, 1991. ~ Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission Supervisor McGraw nominated Roger Smith to serve another three-year term as an at-laYge member. His term will expire June 30, 1993. Supervisor Robers nominated Lee Blair to serve a three- year term expiring June 30, 1993, representing the Cave Spring Magisterial District. IN RE: REPORTS AND INQOIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS SOPERVISOR EDDY: Asked the County Attorney to bring back a report on state legislation regarding local "No Smoking" ordinances. SOPERVISOR JOHNSON: Expressed appreciation to the County Attorney for his excellent representation in Richmond during the General Assembly Sessions. SOPERVISOR MCGRAW: (1) Announced that representatives of the Blue Ridge Region went to Washington and met with Congressmen Olin and Payne to discuss economic development. He June 12, 1990 4 4 5 item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 7, inclusive, as follows: 1. Approval of Minutes - May 8, 1990, May 15, 1990, May 22, 1990 2. Confirmation of Committee Appointments to the Fifth Planning District Commission, Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission, Transportation and Safety Commission and Virginia Western Community College Board. 3. Approval of Raffle Permit - Roanoke County AMVETS Post 92. 4. Request for acceptance of Melissa Drive and Melissa Circle into the VDOT Secondary System. 5. Request for acceptance of Countrywood Drive into the VDOT Secondary System. 6. Donation of drainage easements through Lots 1 and 2, Section 14 along Penn Forest Boulevard, and Lots 37, 38, 39, and 40, Block 3 along Overbill Trail and Lots 11 and 12, Block 3 on Verona Trail, all in the Penn Forest Subdivision. 7. Donation of drainage easements through Tract III- B-1, B-2, and the remaining North portion of Tract III-B, and donation of a parcel of real estate for street purposes, Southwest Industrial Park, Cave Spring Magisterial District. 2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this resolution. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to approve the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Robers NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens June 12 , 19 9 0 4 `~ 7 Transportation. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to approve the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Robers NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens RESOLIITION 61290-10.c REQIIEBTING ACCEPTANCE OF MELISSA DRIVE AND MELISSA CIRCLE INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY ROAD BYBTEM BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That this matter came this day to be heard upon the proceedings herein, and upon the application of Melissa Drive and Melissa Circle to be accepted and made a part of the Secondary System of State Highways under Section 33.1-229 of the Virginia State Code. 2. That it appears to the Board that drainage easements and a fifty (50) foot right-of-way for said road have heretofore been dedicated by virtue of a certain map known as Bali Hi'I Estates Subdivision which map was recorded in Plat Book 10, Page 140, of the records of the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, on April 4, 1986 and that by reason of the recordation of said map no report from a Board of Viewers, nor consent or donation of right-of-way from the abutting property owners is necessary. The Board hereby guarantees said right-of-way for drainage. June 12, 1990 4 4 9 Supervisor Eddy expressed support for this study. He asked Mr. Hodge to bring back more information to the next meeting. 6. Report on Greenway Plan Supervisor Eddy reported that he was not interested in a large involved study but would like the Greenway Plan included in future comprehensive plan and that the staff be aware of the potential when dealing with other agencies. He asked that the planning staff gather a library of information and evaluate action that could be taken now for a future greenway plan concept. Supervisor Johnson suggested that the Fifth Planning District Commission should be the clearinghouse for such information and Supervisor McGraw suggested involving the Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission. IN RE: ADJOIIRNMENT At 6:15 p.m., Supervisor Robers moved to adjourn. The motion was carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Robers NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens ' Richard W. Robers, Chairman ~IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII~J _~.. • ~ ``~: E UEST APPEARANCE R Q _ - _ ,- - yyy / '~ ~ _ . r, - AGENDA ITEM NO. ~ ` ~ ~ ~%~~~~~ ~~`~ ~ ~; - ~ ~ ~-*-. - _ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supex~isors to recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter = CALLED TO THE PODIUM, so that I ma comment.WHEN WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE I RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES -_ LISTED BELOW. ' • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment =_ whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will = decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, __ and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. _ • Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Ques- = tions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. _ c • All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. =_ • Both s eskers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ._ P • S eskers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments '- wpith the clerk. • INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FQR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT ,THEM. BLY AND GIVE TO DEPUTY CLERK _ PLEASE PRINT LEGI _ NAME .~~-~ : ~.~ ,` ~ ADDRESS ~ '-~-~ ~~- r~~~ -~L ~ l-~~ , PHONE ~~ / ~ _~ ~ / ~' mllllllllllllllillllllllllllllllllllllllllilllillilillllllllllllllllllillllillllllllllllllllllllllllllllliillllllllllillllllillil iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiitiiii~iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii~ii~ lv . ~,.~ _ _ _ _ .~ _. _ - - - - ~ ~ ~ -' ., " ~ ~ ~ fi' , ,,, ~ - ., - ~ ~ b. - - CE RE UEST - = APPEARAN Q - n~, __ AGENDA ITEM NO. - - - -_ - ~ ~ a - = I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supex~sors to recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter CALLED TO THE PODIUM, - so that I ma comment.WHEN - I WILL GI E MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE _ _ - RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINE - ~ LISTED BELOW. • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment = whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will - decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, = and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. __ = c • Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Ques- tions of cl ' 'cation may be entertained by the Chairman. _ • All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized = speaker and audience members is not allowed. • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all tunes. • Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments i = with the clerk. • INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FQR AN ORGANIZED c GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT "' THEM. - ._ - PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO DEPUTY CLERK NAME C.= ~3 j ~ v /' F~, ci ~x'i'l" - " ADDRESS - ~~- -ta / ~~// ~/-~ ~ ~~-~< < i'S' ~ s ~-:.' - • .. • • • = PHONE ~' - - - , mllllilllllllilllllllllllllllllllllllllllllillllllilllllllililllllllilillllllllllllllilllllillillillllliilliilllllllliiillllllil~ ~/ COUNTY OF ROANORE, VIRGINIA CAPITAL FUND UNAPPROPRIATED BALANCE Unaudited Beginning Balance at July 1, 1990 $ 9,608 Balance as of July 10, 1990 Submitted by C1J c.,a~ ~ . ~~ U Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance $ 9,608 -~ ~ COIINTY OF ROANORE, VIRGINIA GENERAL FIIND UPTAPPROPRIATED BALANCE Amount Unaudtied Balance at July 1, 1990 $2,653,756 Balance as of July 10, 1990 $2,653,756 Submitted by ~ ~. ~~- Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance - .~ COUNTY OF ROANORE, VIRGINIA RESERVE FOR BOARD CONTINGENCY Beginning Balance at July 1, 1990 $ 50,000 Balance as of July 10, 1990 $ 50,000 Submitted by Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance ACTION NO. ITEM NO. AT A REGULAR COUNTY, VIRGINIA, /Y ~-1 MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: July 10, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: 1991 Legislative Program, Virginia Association of Counties COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY' The Virginia Association of Counties requested its membership to identify major legislative issues of statewide concern that should be considered in the 1991 session of the Virginia General Assembly. This agenda item suggests several issues for Board consideration. BACKGROUND' Last year Roanoke County recommended that VACo consider the following two issues for priority action by the General Assembly: the development of a comprehensive statewide initiative to address the problem of solid waste management, and the authorization of a one-half cent local option sales tax. For this year I requested both the Board and the management team to provide me with suggested issues for consideration and adoption at this time. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The following is a list of legislative initiatives recom- mended for consideration by the Board: 1) Endorsement of the conclusions of the Intergovernmental Relations Task Force pertaining to interlocal cooperation, town- county relations, and city-county relations; 2) Limitation upon increases in real estate tax assessments (last year the Board's legislative program opposed restrictions upon real estate taxes or assessments); 3) Zoning: limit the scope of judicial review of local zoning decisions; oppose any restrictions upon local land use powers; ~--~ 4) Increase salaries of chairman and vice-chairman of Boards of Supervisors; 5) Imposition of a local tax on bingo games based on a percentage of gross receipts; 6) Support additional State funding of Human Service needs, this includes Medicaid reimbursement, funding of administrative and equipment costs, and funding for mandated programs; 7) Equal taxing and borrowing powers - counties should be granted the same local taxing and borrowing powers that cities currently enjoy; 8) Authorization to create and fund stormwater manage- ment/stormwater utilities to meet new federal and state environmen- tal mandates. 9) Parks and Recreation: increase State funding to grant programs for acquisition of land and facilities; authorize tax incentive for private investment and participation in these programs; increase State funding assistance to the arts and humantieis programs of localities through Virginia Commission for the Arts. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board endorse and adopt a recom- mended legislative program for the consideration of the Virginia Association of Counties for the 1991 session of the Virginia General Assembly. Respectfully submitted, Paul M. Mahone County Attorney Action Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by Eddy Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers vote No Yes Abs AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JULY 10, 1990 RESOLUTION CERTIFYING EXECUTIVE MEETING WAS HELD IN CONFORMITY WITH THE CODE OF VIRGINIA WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia has convened an executive meeting on this date pursuant to an affirmative recorded vote and in accordance with the provisions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and WHEREAS, Section 2.1-344.1 of the Code of Virginia requires a certification by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia that such executive meeting was conducted in conformity with Virginia Law. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia hereby certifies that, to the best of each members knowledge: 1. Only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements by Virginia law were discussed in the executive meeting which this certification resolution applies, and 2. Only such public business matters as were identified in the motion convening the executive meeting were heard, discussed or considered by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. I ~Illllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllliillliilllilllllllilllillllllllllllilllllllllllllllllllilllilllllllillillllllllllllll IIII~J _ _ _ . APP EARANCE RE UEST _ Q _ _ _ _ AGENDA ITEM NO. - :-~ - SUBJECT ~ - ~ ~ - ~ ,~ ;~~ ;~- ~ _~ _, ~ ` .~ ~- . .-: ti. _- _ _ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supe~tisors to recognize me during the public hearin on the above m = after = so that I ma comment.WHEN CALLS TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GI E MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE _ _ _ RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW. _ _ • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on anissue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to c do otherwise. _ _ • Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Ques- bons of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. _ __ • All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ._ • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. c _- • Speakers aze requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. c • INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FQR AN ORGANIZED -' _ GROUP SHALL FILE WITH 'THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION _= FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. __ = PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO DEPUTY CLERK c NAME L. C-:- ~-- ~ ~'_ ~/ / `` _ ADDRESS % ~/. ~ r;'~ is %' ~' ~_ ~ ~' ,~' ~ - ~- ._~ 7-- _ PHONE ~ ~' :~'`~ - ~'~ ~ ~=' ~~ ~~/=~ ~ ~~ . ~ . cx <, <~ ~, j _ IIIIIillllllllllillllllllillilllllilllllill Illllillllllillllllllllllllllillllllllllllillllilllllllllllllllllllliillllllliillllll~ 1U 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 _ ~~~u _ __ . _ . APPEARANCE RE UE Q ST ' _ _ _ _ = AGENDA ITEM NO. - ~.~~ = _ _ = sus JECT ~: ~ ~~.~e~~-. _ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supex~isors to recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so that I ma comment.WHEN CALLED TOT HE PODIUM, = I WILL GI E MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES - LISTED BELOW. - _ • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will = c decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Boazd to do otherwise. - • Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Ques- bons of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. _ _- • All comments must be directed to the Boazd. Debate between arecognized = speaker and audience members is not allowed. - • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. • Speakers aze requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. - - • INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FQR AN ORGANIZED _- GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZA'T'ION _= - FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT - THEM. - - - _ _= - LEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO DEPUTY CLERK NAME ~ ~L ~ ~' S ~' - ~ - ADDRESS ~ ~~.,,, ~~ ~ - - - - PHONE 3~ o - ~~ ~ 1 -- mlllllllllllillillilllillllllillllilllillll I IIIII1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 Iillllllllm ~iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii~iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiU _ _ _ _ _ _ - ~ - ~ _ _ _ Q APPEARANCE RE UEST _ _ AGENDA ITEM NO. 7~ "" _ - - SUBJECT N .~ ~- ~ .~ ~,~ ` .. I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supex~isors to recognize me during the public hearin on the above matter so that I may comment.WHEN CALLS TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES c __ LISTED BELOW. • Each speaker will be iven between three to five minutes to comment g whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the tune limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. = s - ~ - • Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Ques- tions of cl ' 'cation may be entertained by the Chairman. - - • All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. c • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. • Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments =_ with the clerk. • INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FQR AN R _ O GANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT ._ - THEM. _. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO DEPUTY CLERK 'c _ NAME ~~ ~ t ~ S , ~d ~.~ K ~% _ _ - - - - ._ - -. - ADDRESS ~ y ~ ~ ~ S ~ lfN~ ~ a ~l ~ ~ ~` , ~ . ~ ._ - - - - - - - - - - _ PHONE 7 ~ y ` Z ~ ~b ~ - - - - - _ - - - - - mlllllllllllllllllillillllllllillll IIIIIIII11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111~" ~iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiu _ _ _ _ ~~~ _ ~ _ _ _ _ ~, _ . PEARA CE RE UEST _ AP N Q _ . _ . _ . _ . _ :_., , AGENDA ITEM NO. ! , ~, ~%' `~'~ ~ ~ ~ -- - __ _ SUBJECTS ~~~~.~:~~~ ~ `w~ ~ ~ ~-~ ~ , ,~`., ,,,-., ~-, ~ ~ ~~'~~~~~_ ~,'~. ~~ ~_ _ - I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supex~tisors to recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter = so that I ma comment.WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES __ LISTED BELOW. c • Each s Baker will be iven between three to five minutes to comment P g whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. c 'Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Ques- bons of cl ' 'cation may be entertained by the Chairman. _ • All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. __ • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. • Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. _ _ • INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FQR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. __ PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO DEPUTY CLERK _ ~ . ~, - NAME z- ~ ;~ ~ ~. . ', ,% -~ _ ~ ~- _ _ -- _ ~-, ADDRESS `- r ' ~, , ~~ 4`' _~ ~ , '~---r _~ ,~ ~ y 2 . ~ ~-- ,, ._ , ~ _ ~? ; `j ~ /_ ,_ PHONE _~? ~ ~ ' ~ ;% ~~, ,=r __ millllillllllliillillllllllllllllllllllliiil Iillliillllilllllliillllllillllllllllllllllllllllllllllilillliillllllllllllllllllllll~ _ , - - ~ _ _ a _ ,, _ - - APPEARANCE RE VEST Q _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ AGENDA ITEM NO. ~~' t~' w~ ~ _ _ - -~ ;~ ,~ suBJEC~r_._~- ~ ~ ~~ - _ - _ - _ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supex~isors to recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter omment.WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM so that I may c = _ I WILL GIVE MY NA-ME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW. _ _ c • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. c • Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Ques- bons of cl ' 'cation may be entertained by the Chairman. • All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized =_ speaker and audience members is not allowed. • Both s Bakers and the audience will exercise courtes at all tunes. P Y - _ • S Bakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments p w ith the clerk. • INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FQR AN ORGANIZED - GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT __ THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO DEPUTY CLERK c fi~~iiiii~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~t~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~i'I ~ r ~~~-j AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CEN'T'ER, TUESDAY, JULY 10, 1990 RESOLUTION 71090-8 AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AMENDMENTS TO THE CONSOLIDATION AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE COUNTY OF ROANORE AND THE CITY OF ROANORE, DIRECTING THE FILING OF SAID AMENDMENTS AND OTHER PAPERS WITH THE CIRCUIT COURTS FOR THE CITY AND THE COUNTY, AND AUTHORIZING FURTHER PROCEEDINGS IN ACCORDANCE THEREWITH WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 22790-3 adopted February 27, 1990, this Board authorized the execution of a Consolidation Agreement between the City and the County; and WHEREAS, such Consolidation Agreement, dated February 28, 1990, was duly executed by the appropriate officials of the City and the County and filed with the Circuit Courts for the City and the County; and WHEREAS, the City and the County are now desirous of effecting certain Amendments to such Consolidation Agreement; and WHEREAS, after legal notice provided as required by Section 15.1-1137, of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, public hearings were held by the City Council for the City of Roanoke and the Board of Supervisors for the County of Roanoke on July 9, 1990, and July 10, 1990, respectively, and all citizens desiring to speak on the amendments to the consolidation agreement and the adoption of this resolution have been provided an opportunity to do so, and; WHEREAS, it has been recommended to the Board of Supervisors that such Amendments to the Consolidation Agreement be accepted by the Board, executed on behalf of the County and filed with the Circuit Courts for the City and the County. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the Chairman is hereby authorized, for and on behalf of the County to execute and the Clerk to the Board to attest, Amendments to the Consolidation Agreement between the City and the County, dated July 11, 1990, a copy of which is on file in the Office of the Clerk to the Board. 2. That all amendments and other legal documents authorized by this resolution shall be approved as to form by the County Attorney. 3. That the County Attorney shall be authorized to file, for and on behalf of the County, any petitions, pleadings, applications, certificates and other legal papers with Federal and State courts and administrative agencies as are deemed necessary and proper by him to permit the question of consolidation to be considered at referendum on November 6, 1990. 4. That the Clerk to the Board is directed to forward an attested copy of this resolution to the Clerk of the Council of the City of Roanoke, the Clerk of the Vinton Town Council, the Clerk of the City of Salem Council, and the Judges of the Circuit Courts for the City and the County. Supervisor Johnson requested that the issues be separated. 1) Section 12 Education. Expand the composition of school board by the addition of two members. On motion of Supervisor McGraw to approve amended school board composition, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Robers NAYS: Supervisors Johnson, Nickens 2) Section 19 Designation of Additional or More Complete Governmental Services to be Provided within Urban Service Districts. Delete the following language: "(1) Additional law enforcement services; (2) Additional fire fighting equipment and services;". On motion of Supervisor Eddy to adopt amended plan regarding fire and law enforcement services, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Robers NAYS: Supervisors Johnson, Nickens 3) Section 14. City of Salem; Glenvar. Revise Exhibit "E" which is incorporated by reference into this section to expand the territory for the second referendum. On motion of Supervisor McGraw to expand territory allowed to join City of Salem, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Robers NAYS: Supervisors Johnson, Nickens A COPY TESTE: ~. v Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Paul Mahoney, County Attorney Mary F. Parker, Clerk, Roanoke City Council Carolyn S. Ross, Clerk, Town of Vinton Forest Jones, Clerk, City of Salem The Honorable Roy B. Willett, Chief Judge, Circuit Court The Honorable G. O. Clemens, Judge, Circuit Court The Honorable Diane McQuade Strickland, Judge, Circuit Court The Honorable Clifford R. Weckstein, Judge, Circuit Court The Honorable Kenneth E. Trabue, Judge, Circuit Court ~ 9 l~ -~ / AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, JULY 10, 1990 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AMENDMENTS TO THE CONSOLIDATION AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE AND THE CITY OF ROANOKE, DIRECTING THE FILING OF SAID AMENDMENTS AND OTHER PAPERS WITH THE CIRCUIT COURTS FOR THE CITY AND THE COUNTY, AND AUTHORIZING FURTHER PROCEEDINGS IN ACCORDANCE THEREWITH WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 22790-3 adopted February 27, 1990, this Board authorized the execution of a Consolidation Agreement between the City and the County; and WHEREAS, such Consolidation Agreement, dated February 28, 1990, was duly executed by the appropriate officials of the City and the County and filed with the Circuit Courts for the City and the County; and WHEREAS, the City and the County are now desirous of effecting certain Amendments to such Consolidation Agreement; and WHEREAS, after legal notice provided as required by Section 15.1-1137, of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, public hearings were held by the City Council for the City of Roanoke and the Board of Supervisors for the County of Roanoke on July 9, 1990, and July 10, 1990, respectively, and all citizens desiring to speak on the amendments to the consolidation agreement and the adoption of this resolution have been provided an opportunity to do so, and; WHEREAS, it has been recommended to the Board of Supervisors that such Amendments to the Consolidation Agreement be accepted by the Board, executed on behalf of the County and filed with the Circuit Courts for the City and the County. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: '.~~,~ 1. That the Chairman is hereby authorized, for and on behalf of the County to execute and the Clerk to the Board to attest, Amendments to the Consolidation Agreement between the City and the County, dated July 11, 1990, a copy of which is on file in the Office of the Clerk to the Board. 2. That all amendments and other legal documents authorized by this resolution shall be approved as to form by the County Attorney. 3. That the County Attorney shall be authorized to file, for and on behalf of the County, any petitions, pleadings, applications, certificates and other legal papers with Federal and State courts and administrative agencies as are deemed necessary and proper by him to permit the question of consolidation to be considered at referendum on November 6, 1990. 4. That the Clerk to the Board is directed to forward an attested copy of this resolution to the Clerk of the Council of the City of Roanoke, the Clerk of the Vinton Town Council, the Clerk of the City of Salem Council, and the Judges of the Circuit Courts for the City and the County. ACTION NO. ITEM NO. c ~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: July 10, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: Amendments to the Consolidation Agreement EXECUTIVE SUMMARY' A public hearing is scheduled for 7:00 p.m. on July 10, 1990, to receive citizen comments upon the proposal to adopt amendments to the Consolidation Agreement. This report summarizes the various amendments. Attached is a copy of a proposed Amendment to the Agreement. BACKGROUND: On February 27, 1990 the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia authorized the execution of the Consolidation Agreement between the County of Roanoke and the City of Roanoke. On March 13, 1990 the Board requested that Roanoke City Council consider several modifications to the agreement. Over the past two months representatives of the County and City have discussed these modifications. On April 10, 1990 the Board voted to amend the proposed Charter for the Roanoke Metropolitan Government and the Consolida- tion Agreement to change the composition of the school board by the addition of two members. Since the "veto" session of the Virginia General Assembly was scheduled to commence in mid-April, it was decided to address this issue at that time. On May 29, 1990, the Board authorized the scheduling of a public hearing for 7:00 p.m. on July 10, 1990, to receive citizen comments upon the proposed amendments, and the publication of appropriate legal notices as required by law. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Representatives of the County and City have completed their negotiations with regards to amendments to the Consolidation Agreement. These amendments are as follows: 1) Section 12 Education. Expand the composition of the school board by the addition of two members. 1 ~~~ -e 2) Section 19 Designation of Additional or More Complete Governmental Services to be Provided within Urban Service Districts. Delete the following language: "(1) Additional law enforcement services; (2) Additional fire fighting equipment and services;". 3) Section 14. City of Salem; Glenvar. Revise Exhibit "E" which is incorporated by reference into this section to expand the territory for the second referendum. The County has followed the same procedure in considering and adopting amendments to the Agreement as it followed in adopting the Agreement on February 27, 1990: schedule a public hearing on these amendments, following the publication of appropriate legal notice as provided in Section 15.1-1137 of the Code of Virginia. Legal notice (and a copy of the amendments to the Agreement) has been published once a week for four successive weeks. The public hearing and action to approve and adopt these amendments is scheduled for July 10, 1990. It is also recommended that these amendments be submitted to the Circuit Court for the entry of an appropriate Order, amending the Order entered April 18, 1990. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Board hold the scheduled public hearing, receive citizen comments, and consider the adoption and approval of the amendments to the Consolidation Agreement. If these amendments are approved, it is further recommended that the Chairman be authorized to execute such documents as may be necessary to signify the Board's action thereon, upon form approved by the County Attorney. Respectfully submitted, Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney Action Vote No Yes Abs Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by Eddy Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers 2 ~qD-1 These Amendments are made and entered into this day of July, 1990, by and between the COUNTY OF ROANOKE, a county of the Commonwealth of Virginia, by its duly elected Board of Supervisors, and the CITY OF ROANOKE, a municipal corporation of the Common- wealth of Virginia, by its duly elected City Council. The Consolidation Agreement, dated February 28, 1990, has been executed by the appropriate officials of the City of Roanoke and the County of Roanoke. The City of Roanoke and the County of Roanoke hereby agree to the following amendments to said agreement. W I T N E S S E T H Section 12, Education; Section 19, Designation of Additional or More Complete Governmental Services to be Provided within Urban Service District; and Exhibit E, Roanoke Metropolitan Government (shaded area represents potential boundary adjustment with Salem- revised 7/90) are hereby amended as follows: 12. Education. (b) On the effective date of consolidation, the existing County school board and City school board shall cease to exist. The consolidated school board of RMG shall consist of eleven (11) members who shall be duly qualified voters, appointed by the governing body of RMG. One (1) member of the RMG school board shall be selected from each of the nine election districts of RMG, one member appointed from the Town of Vinton and one member appointed at large from either the former territory of the old county or the former territory of the old city based upon school- age population. Six (6) members of the school board shall initially serve four (4) year terms from July 1, 1993. Five (5) 1 7ga - / members of the school board shall initially serve two year terms from July 1, 1993. The five (5) members to serve two-year terms from July 1, 1993, shall represent the same election districts as the initial two-year term members of RMG and the member appointed from the Town of Vinton. Thereafter, members of the school board shall be appointed biennially for four-year terms in July of odd- numbered years. Any vacancy on the school board shall be filled by the governing body of RMG for the unexpired portion of the applicable term. For the purpose of determining the appointment of an at-large member of the school from either the former territory of the old county or the former territory of the old city, based on school age population, the governing body of the regional government shall utilize average daily membership as reported to the Department of Education. The parties agree that the County has a larger school- age population as determined by average daily membership as of the date of the execution of this agreement. Therefore, that initial member of the school board to be appointed at-large based upon school-age population shall be appointed from the territory of the former county. For appointments of such at-large members commenc- ing on July 1, 1997, and on each fourth year thereafter, the governing body shall consider the total average daily membership of schools in the former territory of the old county school district and the total average daily membership of schools in the former territory of the old city school district on May 1 of the year of appointment; such at-large member shall be appointed from whichever territory has the greater total average daily membership. 2 ~`~~ - / **** 19. Designation of Additional or More Complete Governmental Services to be Provided within Urban Service District. There may be provided within the Urban Service District of RMG all the governmental services provided in the Suburban Service District and the following governmental services which may be provided on an additional or more complete basis than provided in the Suburban Service District of RMG. These services may include, but shall not be limited to, additional or more complete services in the area of: (1) Additional garbage removal services; (2) Additional public transportation and transportation services; (3) Additional street lighting; (4) Public parking (5) Public market; and (6) Such other governmental services as are permitted by general law to be provided on an additional or more complete basis in service districts. WITNESS our hands and seals: CITY OF ROANOKE By Noel C. Taylor, Mayor COUNTY ROANOKE By Richard W. Robers, Chairman Attest: Mary F. Parker, City Clerk Mary H. Allen, Clerk 3 EXHIBIT E Revised 7/90 /~~'~~ W J ~ a N H ~ 3 L z O~ a ~~ ~ a tL'~ ° ~ z •= o m O~ L2. F OZ ,y.r a N z W N W W O Q W /~~ D: • V a W O Q N v a C O U 0 ~~ Q Y M ~ •^ _Y _ ~ "' C C y y y C ~ Q N Q ~: ~ ; ~_ O O C L O ~ ~ Q Y A -- w v O 2 ~. C V (1. 4 J f ~7~-:~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JULY 10, 1990 ORDINANCE 71090-9 VACATING A 20-FOOT WATERLINE EASEMENT LOCATED ON LOTS 9 AND 10, BLOCK 1, SECTION 8, LaBELLVUE SUBDIVISION, HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, Paul T. Hatam has requested the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia to vacate a 20-foot waterline easement located on Lots 9 and 10, Block 1, Section 8, LaBellvue Subdivision in the Hollins Magisterial District as shown in Plat Book 9, at page 260 of record in the Clerk's Office of the Roanoke County Circuit Court; and, WHEREAS, Section 15.1-482 (b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, requires that such action be accomplished by the adoption of an ordinance by the governing body; and, WHEREAS, notice has been given as required by Section 15.1- 431 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and a first reading of this ordinance was held on June 26, 1990; and the second reading of this ordinance was held on July 10, 1990. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That a 20-foot waterline easement located on Lots 9 and 10, Block 1, Section 8, LaBellvue Subdivision in the Hollins Magisterial District of record in Plat Book 9, at page 260, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, be, and hereby is, vacated pursuant to Section 15.1- 482 (b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended; and, 2. That as a condition to the adoption of this ordinance a new 20-foot waterline easement located on Lots 10 and 11, Block 1, l ~ Section 8, LaBellvue Subdivision be dedicated to Roanoke County and recorded in the aforesaid Clerk's Office. 3. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. 4. That Paul T. Hatam shall record a certified copy of this ordinance with the Clerk of the Circuit Court and shall pay all fees required to accomplish this transaction. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: >!~~~2~'' ~' Mary H. A en, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Development & Inspections Terry Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning ACTION # ITEM NUMBER _~_4D"~ AT A REGULAR MEELDNATOTHEHROANOKD COUNTYEADMINISTRATIONNCENTER COUNTY, VIRGINIA H MEETING DATE:. July 1U, 1990 AGENDA ITEM;. Second reading of the Ordinance requesting a Vacation of an existing 20 foot water 1 i ne Easement 1 ocated on Lots 9 and 10 , Block 1 , Section 8 , LaBe1 ste e, ~SubOd1istr i ct ,' recorded i n P 1 at Boob: 9, Page 260, Hollins Mag COUNTY_A_DMINI_STRATOR'S GOMMENTS: EXECUT_I_VE SUMMARY...- The petitioner, Mr. Paui T. Hatam, is requesting that the Board of Supervisor use cthe awaterl tneg wasf ~ of wplacedr with en ethe by Ord i narice , beta Easement. BACKGROUND _..__ i~ilclare, Inc., when develaping the LaBellvue Subdivision, placed a waterline on the common lot line of Lots 10 and 11 instead of in the recorded Easement. Since the recorded Easement provides na utility service, Mr. Paul T. Hatam, the owner of Lots 9 ar~d 10, is requesting that the Board of Supervisors vacate the existing 20 foot waterline Easement, described above, and shown on the attached map, ire order' that he may improve his property. In return, Mr. Paul T. Hatam and Mr. Robert Bryant, the acue~~ of Lots 1 G and r11i ne Easemlent where the re xd t png ruts 1Rtynserv~ ce i s a 20 foot Ovate located. SUMMARY__OF _INFORMA7_ION Raanoke County is requesting vacated in accordance with Chapter of Virginia, 1950, as amended, Ordinance. that the described Easement be 11, Title 15.1 - 482 lb), Cade by adaption of the attached X40-~. The Departments of Engineering and Utility have commented that they ha~~e no objection to the proposed vacation, on the fallowing condition; 1. That the existing 20 foot waterline Easement be vacated upon the recordation and dedication to Roanoke County a new 20 foot waterline Easement located on Lots 10 and 11 , Block 1, Section 8, LaBellvue Subdivisior7. First reading of the Ordinance was held on June 2~, 1990; The Public Hearing and Second Read~~ng is scheduled for July 10, 1990. STAFF-_RECOMMENDATION The County staff recommends that the Board of Superv~.sars adopt the proposed Ordinance to vacate thel~epeepa~ead~p atU~lthe Easement and instruct the County Attorney, Ordinance, that the 20 foot waterline Easement be vacated upon recordation and ded i cat i on of the new Ovate r l i rie Easement on Lots 10 and 11, Block 1, Section 8 of LaBellvue Subdivision. SPECTFULL'~ SUBMITTED BY: __ Arnold Covey Development and In pections Director APPROVED BY; .~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator --------------------------AGTIUN---- VOTE Na Yes Abs P, p p r o v e d O M o t i o n b Y:--- --------- --- ------ E d d y -- -------- -- - D e n i e d O -- --- --------- ----- ------ J o h n s o n Received i ) _____- _- - ____- - _ - -- Referred _ McGraw _ -- -- -_ - ---- - --_ - - - --- __ Ni c yens ----- __ _ _- - - ---- -------- _-- ---- _ -_ Robers ~. .' '-J ~« -} i~.::~ :~~ _, - ~ ~; ;; ,i ee '~ .,ray wv~ ~ , Y ~ ~ \ ~t '~GD M1 - ~~'' 1\ ''~~ / ~MOr ~~Ja VICINITY MAP \ \ ~~~ ... ~.~ ~ ~ - 4• .~`. ~~®- .~. NORTB 16 Ill O~ \5 a0 p0 SUMMIT R-OGE 4~ •2~~ - w R = 2 95 . i ~ A= ~ / ~ ~ A = 61.8 8 ~ 10' ~=. "~ ~ }' ~0 ~` EXISTING ~ ~ 5' P. U. E . -~-'~ I g LOT I I I ~ LOT 10 LA BELLEVUE ~ b~ SECT ION 8 (P8.9 PG.260) lA BELLEVUE j -~ ' 3 " ' (P8.9 PG. 260) m - N 0 I LOT 9 LA BELLEVUE (PB • 9 PG. 2 60) J~I NEW 20~ EXISTING 20t\ W BASEMENT I ~ ` C A.P.CO. TRANSMISSION ` LINE R/W ~~`~,~o - ~ - ` - .- a ~`~ ~ ~ 552°-46'-42"w ` \~, ~.: l60' I10' LOT 21 LA BELLEVUE (P8.9 PG. 261) l 39.02 - 3 -17 TAX >wAAP NO. SCALE : I : 60 COMMUNI?YSBRVICI~.S 20 FT. WATER LINE EASEMExT TO BE VACATED '; AND DBVBLOPMBNT saowx Ix CRAY 6 s \9.b P EXISTING 20' WATER LIN1= EASEMENT TO BE VACATED ~~~ ~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JULY 10, 1990 ORDINANCE VACATING A 20-FOOT WATERLINE EASEMENT LOCATED ON LOTS 9 AND 10, BLOCK 1, SECTION 8, LaBELLVUE SUBDIVISION, HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, Paul T. Hatam has requested the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia to vacate a 20-foot waterline easement located on Lots 9 and 10, Block 1, Section 8, LaBellvue Subdivision in the Hollins Magisterial District as shown in Plat Book 9, at page 260 of record in the Clerk's Office of the Roanoke County Circuit Court; and, WHEREAS, Section 15.1-482 (b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, requires that such action be accomplished by the adoption of an ordinance by the governing body; and, WHEREAS, notice has been given as required by Section 15.1- 431 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and a first reading of this ordinance was held on June 26, 1990; and the second reading of this ordinance was held on July 10, 1990. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That a 20-foot waterline easement located on Lots 9 and 10, Block 1, Section 8, LaBellvue Subdivision in the Hollins Magisterial District of record in Plat Book 9, at page 260, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, be, and hereby is, vacated pursuant to Section 15.1- 482 (b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended; and, 2. That as a condition to the adoption of this ordinance a new 20-foot waterline easement located on Lots 10 and 11, Block 1, 1 ~ ~~ -. Section 8, LaBellvue Subdivision be dedicated to Roanoke County and recorded in the aforesaid Clerk's Office. 3. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. 4. That Paul T. Hatam shall record a certified copy of this ordinance with the Clerk of the Circuit Court and shall pay all fees required to accomplish this transaction. 2 O~ POAN ~.~ ti p Z ~ 2 a 18 ES0) 88 ~E80UICENTENN~'~ A Beauti~ulBtginnin); COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE July 12, 1990 (~1111t1f1J Uf ~II~iYiA~P All AMf RICA CItY ''II'I 1979 1989 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS RICHARD W. ROBERS. CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT STEVEN A. MCGRAW. VICE-CHAIRMAN GATAWBA MAGISTERAL DISTRICT LEE B. EDDY WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERLAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT Dr. Robert L. Wayne Lynn Haven Baptist Church 1501 Washington Street Vinton, VA 24179 Dear Dr. Wayne: On behalf of the Board of Supervisors, I would like to take this opportunity to let you know of our appreciation for your attending the meeting on Tuesday, July 10, 1990, to offer the invocation. We feel it is most Important to ask God's blessing on these meetings so that all it done according to His will and for the good of all citizens. Thank you for sharing your time with us. S/inc~erely C./ - R. W. obers, Chairman Roanoke County Board of Supervisors RWR/bjh P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24018-0798 (703) 772-2004 O~ POANp~.~ ti '~ p Z z o a 18 E50 88 SFSQUICENTENN~P~ A Beautiful Beginning COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE Mr. Murry K. White P. 0. Box 137 Salem, VA 24153 Dear Mr. White: July 11, 1990 All #MERIG CITY I I ~ ~ I 1979 1989 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS RICHARD W. ROBERS. CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT STEVEN A. MCGRAW. VICE•CHAIRMAN CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT LEE B. EDDY WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOW NS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT This is to advise that at their meeting held on Tuesday, July 10, 1990, the Board of Supervisors voted unanimously to appoint you as a member of the League of Older Americans Board of Directors to complete the unexpired portion of Mr. Matthew Banks' three-year term. This term will end in March, 1991. State law provides that any person elected, re-elected, or appointed to any body be furnished a copy of the Freedom of Information Act and a copy of the Conflict of Interest Act. Since copies of these Acts were mailed on May 24, 1990, to you upon your appointment to the League of Older Americans Advisory Board, we are not sending you another copy. On behalf of the Supervisors and the citizens of Roanoke County, please accept our sincere thanks and appreciation for your willingness to accept this appointment. Sincerely, ~~ l~ Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors MHA/bjh pc: Mr. Prentice A. Webb, President League of Older Americans C~aixn~~ of ~n~tnnkr P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24018-0798 (703) 772-2004 o~ aonrv ~,~ L ti A Z z 18 ~ ~50~ 88 ~EBQUICENTENN~~~ A 13rauu~u/Hr~inrony~ COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE C~nitnf~ of ~uttnvkP Mr. Larry Lester 2920 McNeil Drive Roanoke, VA 24018 Dear Mr. Lester: July 11, 1990 ~~ ALLAMERIG CITY '~II~' 1979 1989 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS RICHARD W. ROBERS. CHAIRMAN GVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT STEVEN A. MCGRAW. VICE-CHAIRMAN CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT LEE B. EDDY WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERALL. DISTRICT 808 L. JOHNSON HOLUNS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT The Board of Supervisors have asked me to express on their behalf their sincere appreciation for your previous service to the Building Code Board of Adjustments and Appeals. Citizens so responsive to the needs of their community and willing to give of themselves and their time are indeed all too scarce. This is to advise that at their meeting held on Tuesday, July 10, 1990, the Board of Supervisors voted unanimously to reappoint you as an alternate member of the Building Code Board of Adjustments and Appeals for another four-year term. Your term will begin on July 25, 1990, and expires July 25, 1994. State law provides that any person elected, re-elected, or appointed to any body be furnished a copy of the Freedom of Information Act; your copy is enclosed. We are also sending you a copy of the Conflict of Interest Act. Both of these acts were amended by the Virginia General Assembly in July, 1989 It is necessary that you take an oath of office before the Clerk of the Roanoke County Circuit Court. This oath must be administered prior to your participation on this Board. Please telephone Mrs. Elizabeth Stokes, Clerk, at 387-6208, as soon as possible and arrange to have the oath administered. On behalf of the Supervisors and the citizens of Roanoke County, please accept our sincere thanks and appreciation for your willingness to accept this appointment. Sincerely, ~• Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors MHA/bjh Enclosures pc: Mrs. Elizabeth Stokes Mr. Skip Nininger, Development & Inspections P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24018-0798 • <703> 772-2004 O~ POANp~.~ ~ '~ 9 Z Z 0 a 18 E~ 88 SFS6IUICENTENN~P~' A Beauti~u/ Beginning COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE July 11, 1990 The Honorable Roy B. Willett, Chief Judge 23rd Judicial Circuit Roanoke City Courthouse 315 Church Avenue, S.W. Roanoke, VA 24011 Dear Judge Willett: All AMERIG LITY ''' I' I 1979 1989 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS RICHARD W. ROBERS, CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT STEVEN A. MCGRAW. VICE-CHAIRMAN CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT LEE 8. EDDY WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT Attached is a copy of Resolution No. 71090-8 authorizing the execution of amendments to the Consolidation Agreement between the County of Roanoke and the City of Roanoke. This resolution was adopted by the Board of Supervisors at their meeting on Tuesday, July 10, 1990. If you need further information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, J~ - L~ Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors bjh Attachment pc: The Honorable G. O. Clemens The Honorable Diane McQuade Strickland The Honorable Clifford R. Weckstein The Honorable Kenneth E. Trabue Mary F. Parker, Clerk, Roanoke City Council Carolyn S. Ross, Clerk, Town of Vinton Forest Jones, Clerk, City of Salem Paul Mahoney, County Attorney C~nixnt~ of ~uttnv~r P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24018-0798 (703) 772-2004 O~ pOANp,I-~ ti 'w 9 Z ~ 2 J a 18 E50 88 SFS~UICENTENN\p`\' A BcautifulBrginning COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE July 11, 1990 The Honorable Howard E. Musser, Chairman Regional Cable Television Committee 215 Church Avenue, S.W. Roanoke, VA 24011 Dear Mr. Musser: QI~MERICA CITY 1'I I'/ 1979 1989 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS RICHARD W. ROBERS, CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT STEVEN A. MCGRAW. VICE-CHAIRMAN CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT LEE 8. EDDY WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT This is to advise that at their meeting held on Tuesday, July 10, 1990, the Board of Supervisors voted unanimously to appoint Steven A. McGraw to serve as representative from Roanoke County on the Cable TV Negotiating Committee. If you need further information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, bjh C~nixn~~ o~ ~nttnokr Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24018-0798 (703) 772-2004 Nye z m~ ~~ a,~~ ~~ ~~~ OF AOANp,,~~ ~ ~i Y~ ~~~~ %+i~~~~~~ Z ~ - z v a DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 150 QQ 1 ~ YEAflS 8$ „' T r~ ~~ ^ QUICENTEN P ~ ~~ ~~ ~ A BeautifulBeginning ~~ . r;~ s ~~ R'` ~y .€ ~ M E M O R rr'' 1 AN D U M ' ~ ~ a TO: Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator FROM: Timothy W. Gubala, Director, Economic Development ~(~~~ DATE: June 12, 1990 SUBJECT: Public-Private Partnership Agreement for Optical Cable Corporation Optical Cable Corporation has entered into a lease agreement with Alan Lingerfelt to occupy a 78,000 square foot manufacturing activity on 6.5 acres at Valleypointe (Phase I.) The following criteria listed in the Public-Private Partnership Policy (Resolution 22790-1) are applicable: 1. Optical Cable Corporation is a manufacturing company that produces optical cable for commercial and military applications. 2. Total investment in real estate is $4,000,000 with another $2,500,000 in new manufacturing equipment. This will generate estimated annual real estate taxes of $46,000 and $18,750 in machinery and tools. 3. Total employment will be 70 initially and 185 after three years. Annual initial payroll will be approximately $2 million. 4. Specific water and sewer lines are 3-inch domestic water, 6- inch fire service and 3-inch sewer. 5. The building permit has been issued and construction is pending completion of grading by the contractor. Building is scheduled for completion by August 1, 1990. 6. Optical Cable Corporation has entered into a ten (10) year lease agreement with Optical Associates, L.P. (Lingerfelt) to occupy the building to be constructed. P.O. BOX 29800 • ROANOKE .VIRGINIA 2 4018-07 9 8 • (703) 772-2069 FAX. NO.: (703> 772-2030 Clifford Craig's estimates of off-site facility fees and connection fees for the water, sewer and fire service is $60, 066. An analysis of the anticipated taxes from real estate and machinery and tools indicates a payback of $64,750 in the first year. Roanoke County participation is-..recommended from the Economic Development Fund a-fter July 1,,_19.9.0'. If necessary, we may want to place this item o~~~n~ agenda for the June 26, 1990 Board of Supervisors meeting. Please review and advise. sbo Attachment r-.;; - i~~ ~~.~ 1g9 t., .~~ ~,Y,, EC(;C~~~~Kt`~tJLyT`l ~ i~ MEMORANDUM TO: Tim Gubala and Diane Hyatt FROM: Cliff Craig DATE: May 23, 1990 SUBJECT: Connection Fees for optical Cable I have received the plans for the Optical Cable facility at Valleypointe. The plans indicate a 6" fire service and a 3" domestic service. The fees for the above are calculated as follows: Water Off-Site Facility Fee for 6" Fire Service $19,096 Water Off-Site Facility Fee for 3" Domestic Service 23,870 Water Basic Connection Fee for 6" Fire Service 7,600 Water Basic Connection Fee for 3" Domestic Service 2,000 Sewer Off-Site Facility Fee Based on 3" Water Service 7,500 TOTAL WATER AND SEWER CONNECTION FEE $60,066 The basic connection fee for the 3" domestic has been reduced from $3,800 to $2,000 to reflect the use of a single meter vault for both fire and domestic service. (Note that they have changed from a 1 1/2" service to a 3" service. This increases the cost of water $21,303 and increases the cost of sewer $5,000 from that of Ingersoll-Rand.) Please note this change on my May 11, 1990 memo for Ingersoll-Rand and Hansteck. When the payment of these fees by Economic Development is approved, Diane can make the transfers into the appropriate account as noted above. CC:mh N v ~®MM®N~V~~L'I'H of S~g~~~N~A NEALJ.BARBER DEPARTMENT OF DIRECTOR HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT June 7, 1990 The Honorable Richard Robers Chairman, Board of Supervisors County of Roanoke 3738 Brambleton Avenue Roanoke, Virginia 24018 Dear Mr. Robers: Fourth Street Office Building 205 North Fourth Street Richmond, Virginia 232131747 (8041786-1575 Thank you for your submittal of a Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) proposal in the 1990 competition. The Department of Housing and Community Development has completed its review of the CDBG proposals received in the first round of competition. An objective rating system was used to judge the applications. Of the 1,000 points available in the rating system, your project received 562 points. Grant offers have been made to local governments with projects rating 703 or more. The Dep. from sixty-e requests. worthwhile communities If you of your app] - -------a ~,,,,,,,,,,n;tv Improvement Grant c~ ~-~ ~~c-~-~ J- /U Financial As '~~ "'""`'~`~ .alt- We app ~' ~~ Development ~~.eJ. v r C.~ V ! , -'1 r c.~` ~ ca r ks cc: Mr. Elmer C. Hodge proposals -'ping ~ery 27 :ing zity pity Building Better Communities PRESENTED BY BTEVE CARPENTER WITH SLIDE SHOW 3. Recognition of Alfred Anderson, Treasurer for being certified as a Professional Government Treasurer FRED ANDERSON PRESENT TO BE RECOGNIZED D. .NEW BUSINESS la. Report on Consolidation Issues ECH PRESENTED MEMORANDUM REGARDING TA% RATE AND BOND INDEBTEDNESS IN ROANORE COUNTY IN RESPONSE TO ISSUES RAISED AT SALEM PUBLIC MEETING. SAM MOTION TO SEND INFORMATION TO CITY OF SALEM AND ASKED THAT THEY CORRECT INCONSISTENCIES AND INACCIIRACIES TO CITIZENS OF ROANORE COUNTY. - DEFEATED AYES-SAM, RWR NAYS-LBE, BLJ CONSENSUS TO SEND COPIES OF MEMORANDUM TO MAYORS OF LOCAL GOVERNMENTS AND THAT ARTICLE BE INCLIIDED IN ROANORE COUNTY TODAY EBPLAINING FACTS lb. Authorization to conduct a peer review study of County operations. A-62690-1 ' LBE MOTION TO APPROVE AND FUND URC - HCN ABSENT 2. Adoption of Resolution amending Section 200 of The Design and Construction Standards Manual R-62690-2 BLJ TO ADOPT RESO URC - HCN ABSENT 3. Appropriation of funds for leachate removal at Dixie Caverns landfill. A-62690-3 SAM MOTION TO APPROPRIATE FUNDS URC - HCN ABSENT 4. 1991 Legislative Program - Virginia Association of Counties BLJ MOTION TO SET WORK SESSION ON 7/10/90 FOR FURTHER DISCUSSION 2 from M-1 to M-2 to develop five industrial sites, one of which is a contractors' equipment storage yard or plant, located on Starkey Road (Route 904) approximately 350 feet north of Crescent Boulevard, Cave Spring Magisterial District, upon the request of Frank W. Martin. BLJ MOTION TO TABLE TO RESOLVE ISSUES URC - HCN ABSENT ONE CITIZEN SPORE SAM MOTION TO REMOVE FROM TABLE FOLLOWING DISCUSSION BETWEEN PETITIONER AND PLANNING DIRECTOR • URC - HCN ABSENT- 0-62690-17 RWR TO APPROVE REZONING PORTION AS DEFINED IN MAP CONTINGENT UPON PROPER DESIGNATION GIVEN TO STAFF. URC - HCN ABSENT 690-4 Ordinance to conditionally rezone approximately 1.25 acres from R-1 to B-2 to construct a convenience store with gas pumps, located on Hardy Road, approximately 0.4 mile west of Feather Road, Vinton Magisterial District upon the request of Henry J. Brabham IV. 8A1[ ~tOTIOM TO CONTINUE TO 7-10-90 URC - HCN ABSENT Q. CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS NONE R. EBECIITIVE SESSION AT 9:15 P.M.,BLJ MOTION PURSUANT TO CODE OF VIRGINIA 2.1-344 A (1) TO CONSIDER A PERSONNEL MATTER - EVALUATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR AND COUNTY ATTORNEY URC - HCN ABSENT 8. CERTIFICATION OF E%ECIITZVE SESSION R-62690-18 RWR MOTION AT 10:35 P.M. URC - HCN ABSENT 8 G. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance requesting vacation of an existing 20 foot waterline easement located on Lots 9 and 10, Block 1, Section 8, LaBellvue Subdivision, Hollins Magisterial District. BLJ TO APPROVE 18T READING 2liD - 7/10/90 IIRC - HCN ABSENT 2. Ordinance amending and readopting Section 4-53 of Article III, Shooting Matches of Chapter 4, Amusements; Section 2-17 of Chapter 2, Administration; Section 11-28 of Article II, Parlor Permit: of Chapter 11, Massage Parlors: Section 12-12 and 12-13 of Article I. In General, Article IV. Accidents and Section 12-121 and 12- 125 of Article V. Ino,~perative Motor Vehicles, Trailers and Semitrailers, of Chapter 12, Motor Vehicles and Traffic: Article II. Permit of Chapter 14. Parade; and Section 15-2, 15-7, 15- 10, and 15-i1 of Chapter 15, Parks and Recreation of the Roanoke County Code. 0-62690-8 LBE TO WAIVE 2ND READING AND ADOPT ORD. IIRC - HCN ABSENT H. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance amending and readopting Chapter 16 of the Roanoke County Code as Chapter 16A, Precious Metals and Gems. 0-62690-9 SAM MOTION TO ADOPT ORD AMENDED WITH "(A)" INCLIIDED FOLLOWING CHAPTER 16 WHEREVER APPLICABLE IIRC - HCN ABSENT 2 Ordinance establishing a County Police Force for the County of Roanoke, Roanoke County Code, Chapter 16, Sections 1 - 18. 0-62690-10 BLJ MOTION TO ADOPT ORD IIRC - HCN ABSENT 4 L E G A L N O T I C E Notice is hereby given to all interested persons that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at their 7:00 p.m. session on Tuesday, July 10, 1990, in the Community Room at the Roanoke County Administrator Center, 3738 Brambleton Avenue S. W. on the petition of the Paul T. Hatam requesting vacation of an existing 20 foot waterline easement located on Lots 9 and 10, Block 1, Section 8, LaBellvue Subdivision, Hollins Magisterial District. A copy of the Zoning Ordinance of Roanoke County and amendments thereto as well as a copy of the petition, site plan, and other documents related to this request may be examined in the office of the Department of Development, located in Room 600 at the Roanoke County Administration Center. Roanoke County will provide assistance to handicapped persons desiring to attend public hearings. Such individuals are requested to contact Human Resources (703) 772-2018 is special provisions are necessary for attendance. Given under my hand this 19TH DAY OF JUNE, 1990. lam- - a~.~-r~.~' Mary H. Allen, Clerk to the Board Roanoke County Board of Supervisors PLEASE PUBLISH IN THE EVENING EDITION OF THE ROANOKE TIMES AND WORLD NEWS.ON: TUESDAY, JUNE 26, 1990 TUESDAY, JULY 3, 1990 Direct the Bill for Publication to: Phillip Henry, Engineering Director County of Roanoke P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, Va. 24018 PUBLIC NOTICE Pursuant to Section 15.1-1137, Code of Virginia (1950), as amended, and 9(b) of the Consolidation Agreement between the County of Roanoke and the City of Roanoke, the Board of Supervisors of the County and the City Council of the City hereby give public notice that measures authorizing the execution of the following amendments to the Consolidation Agreement may be adopted by the two governing bodies and such amended Consolidation Agreement may be filed with the Circuit Courts of the County of Roanoke and the City of Roanoke on or about July 11, 1990. Public hearings at which all citizens shall be accorded the opportunity to comment with respect to the amendments to the Consolidation Agreement and the adoption of measures authorizing the execution of the amended Agreement will be held as follows: Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke Administration Center 3738 Brambleton Avenue Roanoke, VA 24018 7:00 p.m., July 10, 1990 City Council of the City of Roanoke Council Chambers Municipal Building 215 Church Ave., SW Roanoke, VA 24011 7:30 p.m., July 9, 1990 The revised Exhibit "E", a map showing the expanded Territory of Second Referendum, is not published herein. This revised exhibit, along with the amendments to the Consolidation Agreement, are on file and available for public inspection in the Office of the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors and in the Office of the City Clerk. The amendments to the Consolidation Agreement provide in their entirety as follows: COMMITTEE VACANCIES IN 1990 JANUARY FEBRUARY ELECTORAL BOARD - APPOINTED BY COURTS Three year terms of Leonard M. Pick, Secretary, and Armand L. Sanderson, Chairman, will expire 02/28/90. GRIEVANCE PANEL Two year term of Eugene M. Martin will expire 02/23/90. REGIONAL AIRPORT COMMISSION Three year term of Bob L. Johnson will expire 02/10/90. MARCH COURT SERVICE UNIT ADVISORY COUNCIL/YOUTH AND FAMI_L_Y SERVICES ADVISORY BOARD Two year terms of Gerald Curtiss, Catawba District, Roger Smith, Catawba District, Gary J. Minter, Hollins District, and Sherry Robison, Windsor Hills District, will expire 03/22/90. LEAGUE OF OLDER AMERICANS One year term of Webb Johnson will expire 03/31/90. TRANSPORTATION AND SAFETY COMMISSION Four year terms of Arnold Struson, Medical Representative, and Jackie Talevi, Legal Respresentative District, will expire 03/01/90. APRIL TRANSPORTATION AND SAFETY COMMISSION Four year term of Lt. Delton R. Jessup, State Police Representative, will expire 04/01/90. 1 MAY TAP BOARD OF DIRECTORS Two year terms of Elizabeth W. Stokes, County Appointee, and E. Cabell Brand, Joint Appointee will expire 05/05/90. JUNE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS Five year term of M. E. Maxey, Chairman, Vinton District, will expire 06/30/90. FIFTH PLANNING DISTRICT COMMISSION Three year term of Lee B. Eddy, Elected Representative, serving Bob Johnson's unexpired term will expire 06/30/90. PARRS & RECREATION ADVISORY COMMISSION Three year term of Alice Gillespie, Hollins District, will expire 06/30/90. Three year term of Linda Shiner, Cave Spring District, William J. Skelton, Jr., Windsor Hills District, and Roger Smith, Members at Large will expire 06/30/90. ROANORE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD - APPOINTED BY SCHOOL BOARD SELECTION COMMITTEE Four year term of Charlsie Pafford, Windsor Hills District, will expire 06/30/90. VIRGINIA AESTERN COMMIINITY COLLEGE BOARD Four year term of Monty Plymale will expire 06/30/90. JULY BIIILDING CODE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS AND APPEALS Four year terms of Larry Lester, Alternate, and John Brownlee, Alternate, will expire 07/25/90. AUGUST 2 SEPTEMBER GRIEVANCE PANEL Two year terms of Thomas T. Palmer and R. Vincent Reynolds, Atlernate, will expire 09/10/90. INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AIITHORITY Four year terms of J. Carson Quarles, and Daniel A. Zahn, will expire 09/26/90. OCTOBER BUILDING CODE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS AND APPEALS Four year term of Albert Trompeter, will expire 10/24/90. NOVEMBER DECEMBER BUILDING CODE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS AND APPEALS Four year term of Wilmore T. Leffell, Vinton District, will expire 12/12/90. LIBRARY BOARD Four year term of Leesa Dalton will expire 12/31/90. MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES OF THE ROANORE VALLEY COMMUNITY SERVICES BOARD Three year terms of Henry L. Woodward, Member at Large, and Henry J. Sullivan, County Appointee, will expire 12/31/90. ROANORE PLANNING COMMISSION Four year term of A. Kyle Robinson, Vinton District, will expire 12/31/90. 3 r log !99a v ~Q. ~6-~~d-o?°C~Ja~ ~~ ~R ~4 ~~Y/`CU FROM THE MINUTES OF ESSIONUATY7SPHM I'ONOJUNEO2gROA990EINOTHEyI MEETING IN REGULAR S VIRGINIA. BOARD ROOM OF THE SCHOOL ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, SALEM, RESOLUTION REQUESTING AN APPROPRIATION TO THE SCHOOL TEXTBOOK FUND FOR 1989-90 WHEREAS, the School Textbook Fund has received additional revenue than the amount budgeted for 1989-90 and has incurred expenditures offsetting said revenue; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the County School Board of Roanoke County, on motion of Charlsie S. Pafford and duly seconded, requests an appropriation in the amount of $22, 000.00 to the School Textbook Fund for 1989-90 for the additional revenue received and expenditures incurred for the fiscal year. Adopted on the following recorded vote: AYES: Paul G. Black, Maurice L. Mitchell, Charlsie S. Pafford, Frank E. Thomas NAYS: None ABSENT: Barbara B. Chewning TESTE :.~ ,~ / . ~ ~~ ~~ _ Clerk L~ ~ -~_ c: Mrs. Diane Hyatt