The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About8/14/1990 - RegularA N ~. F p ~u-~E~~ cmr ~n ,~~~nuk.~ ,~ ~ 18 ~ 88 ~ +E:~UICENTENN~~~ ~ • / •~ • / ~ Bc~~ti~ul BcRin~~~g ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ACTION AGENDA AUGUST 14, 1990 Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supezvisors Meeting. Regular meetings are held on the second Tuesday and the fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public hearings are held at 7:00 p.m on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.) 1. Roll Call ALL PRESENT AT 3:02 P.M. 2. Irrvocation: The Reverend Sam Crews Coopers Cove Baptist Church 3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag. B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS NONE C. PROCIAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS, AND AWARDS i 1. Resolution of Appreciation to Hope Patsel upon her retirement. R-81490-1 HCN MOTION TO ADOPT RESO - URC HOPE PATSEL PRESENT TO RECEIVE 2. Recognition of Diane Hyatt and Paul Grice for receiving the Government Finance Officers Association Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting DIANE HYATT AND PAUL GRICE PRESENT TO RECEIVE 3. Presentation to Don Myers from Police Department RAY LAVINDER PRESENTED PIAQUE TO DON MYERS IN APPRECIATION FOR HIS WORK DURING THE POLICE DEPARTMENT TRANSITION D. NEW BUSINESS 1. Presentation on Roanoke County Recycling. A-81490-2 BL,T SUBSTITUTE MOTION TO REFER RECYCLING ADVISORY COMIVHTTEE PROPOSAL BACK TO STAFF FOR RECOMII~NDATION DEFEATED AYES-BLJ,HCN NAYS-LBE, SAM, RWR LBE MOTION TO CREATE A RECYCLING CObIlVIIZTEE AND THAT ECH BRING BACK RECOMII~NDATIONS FOR MEMBERSHIP AYES-LBE,SAM,RWR NAYS-BI~T,HCN 2 2. Request to accept and appropriate two grants on behalf of the Department of Social Services. A-81490-3 SAM MOTION TO ACCEPT GRANTS URC 3. Acceptance of a grant by the County Library for a Literacy Program. A-81490-4 HCN MOTION TO ACCEPT GRANT URC 4. Approval of amendments to Employee Handbook concerning Police Department employees A-81490-5 LBE MOTION TO APPROVE AMENDMENTS URC E. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS NONE F. REQUEST FOR WORK SESSIONS 1. Joint Work Session with Planning Commission BOARD CONSENSUS TO SET JOINT WORK SESSION AS FOLLOWS FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 21 - 5:00 P.M. - SATURDAY, SEPTEMBER 22 - 9:00 A.M. - 5:00 P.M. G. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 3 1. Ordinance requesting vacation of a 50 foot right-of~vay referred to as "Goff Road" recorded in Plat Book 3, Page 59, and located in the Catawba Magisterial District. SAM MOTION TO APPROVE 1ST READING URC - 2ND 8/28/90 2. Ordinance authorizing Deed of Exchange and Partial Release of easement for water facilities at Tanglewood Mall. HCN MOTION TO APPROVE 1ST READING URC - 2ND 8/28/90 H. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance imposing or increasing user fees for the Parks and Recreation Department. (CONTINUED FROM JULY 24, 1990). 3 CITIZENS SPOKE IN OPPOSITION: FRED CORBETT, 5511 SZ~ARNES AVE, ROANOKE JUDY MOORS, 7647 APPLE GROVE LANE JERRY HIGGINBOTHAM, 7215 HOLLYBERRY ROAD S.W. 0-81490-6 SAM SUBSTITUTE MOTION TO APPROVE ALT. #3 DEFEATED AYES-SAM, BLJ NAYS-LBE, HCN, RWR HCN MOTION TO APPROVE ORD. AMENDED BY LBE, AND THAT FEES BE EFFECTIVE WITH NEXT SPORT SEASON SIGNUPS AND NEXT CIASS SIGNUPS, AND THAT ECH ESTABLISH COA~IlVIITTEE MADE UP OF THOSE CITIZENS WHO SPOKE TO STUDY FEES FOR THERAPEUTICS PROGRAM. URC 4 I. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS 1. Request from Supervisor Nickens for Board member attendance at the National Institute of Justice Program. NO SUPERVISOR WAS ABLE TO ATTEND.. HCN ASKED ECH TO BRING BACK REC011~Il1~NDATION OF STAFF PERSON TO ATTEND. SUPERVISOR EDDY: (1) ANNOUNCED HE WILL NOT ATTEND VACO CONFERENCE. (2) ASKED PMM TO REPORT ON ORDINANCES REGARDING (a) NOISE OR PUBLIC NUISANCE AND (b) SMOKING. PMM ADVISED THAT STAFF WILL BRING BACK A RECONIlVIENDATION THAT WII~L STRENGTHEN THE NOISE ORDINANCE AND HAS CIRCULATED A DRAFT OF THE SMOKING ORDINANCE. PROBLEM IS ENFORCEMENT AND NO ONE `WILLING TO ENFORCE BECAUSE VIOLATIONS ARE CIVII. OFFENSES. (3) NOTED THAT PMM RECOMII~NDED INCREASING BINGO AND RAFFLE PERNIIT AUDIT FEE FROM 1% TO 2%. RECEIVED BOARD CONSENSUS TO HAVE PMM BRING BACK REPORT WITH RECOMII~NDATION. SUPERVISOR TOHNSON: ADVISED THAT BZA HAD DENIED A REQUEST FROM CAROLYN HAWLEY FOR A ZONING VARIANCE TO PARK HER TRAILER IN FRONT OF BUILDING LINE.. NOTED THIS COULD BE A HARDSHIP. ASKED PMM TO RESEARCH AND SEE IF ORDINANCE COULD BE REVISED. LBE SUGGESTED INCLUDING PLANNING COMIVIISSION IN DISCUSSION. SUPERVISOR MCGRAW: (1) ANNOUNCED THAT VACO EXEC. DIRECTOR SEARCH CONIlVIITTEE HAD MET IN CHARLOTTESVII.LE AND PLAN TO HAVE SOMEONE ON BOARD BY NOVEMBER (2) ANNOUNCED HE THOUGHT THE SDN MARKET RESEARCH ON CONSOLIDATED GOVERNMENT COST SAVINGS WAS SLANTED AND FACTS WERE MISCONSTRUED. OTHER BOARD MEMBERS CONCURRED AND EXPRESSED CONCERN TO LOCAL NEWSPAPER EDITOR ASKED ECH TO BRING BACK A FULL REPORT ON THE RESEARCH AND ASKED THAT INFORMATION BE PUBLISHED IN ROANOKE COUNTY TODAY. (3) EXPRESSED CONCERN ABOUT LETTER FROM DONNA WOOD AND 5 IANDFILL CITIZENS ADVISORY CONIlVIITTEE STATING THAT MONTGOMERY COUNTY SHOULD NOT BE ALLOWED TO JOIN THE IANDFILL. FELT ALL SHOULD KEEP AN OPEN MIIVD BECAUSE THE SAVINGS COULD REACH $6 MILLION DOLLARS IF OTHER ADJACENT LOCALII7ES JOINED THE IANDFILL. SUPERVISOR ROBERS: (1) ADVISED HE ATTENDED A RECEPTION FOR PAULA BROWNLEE AND ASKED THAT A LETTER BE SENT TO HER EXPRESSING OUR APPRECIATION FOR HER WORK AND ASSISTANCE TO ROANOKE COUNTY. SAM SUGGESTED LETTER BE SENT UNDER BLJ'S SIGNATURE. (2) ANNOUNCED THERE WII.L BE ANOTHER CONFERENCE REGARDING THE SMART HIGHWAY ON 9,114/90 AT VPI&SU. SUPERVISOR NICKENS: (SEE ITEM 1) (2) ASKED FOR REPORT ON REFUND TO RECREATION CLUBS WHO RAN CONCESSION WHO PAID FOR INSURANCE. JOHN CHAMBLISS ADVISED HE IS WORI~NG WITH THE REC CLUBS ON THIS. J. APPOINTMENTS A-81490-7 1. Board of Zoning Appeals 2. Building Code Board of Adjustments and Appeals HCN MOTION TO ABOLISH ONE ALTERNATE POSITION URC 3. Community Corrections Resource Board LBE NOMINATED EDMUND KIELTY TO SERVE TERM FROM 1989 TO 1990 AND TO REAPPOINT TO ONE-YEAR TERM EXPIRING 8/13/91. 4. Grievance Panel 6 5. Industrial Development Authority BLJ NOMINATED J. CARSON QUARLES TO ANOTHER FOUR-YEAR TERM. LBE ADVISED THAT DANIEL A. ZAHN LIVES IN ADJACENT LOCALITY INSTEAD OF ROANOKE COUNTY. EXPRESSED CONCERN ABOUT APPOINTING EVEN THOUGH STATE CODE ALLOWS HIM TO SERVE. HCN SUGGESTED THAT SOMEONE FROM ROANOKE COUNTY SHOULD SERVE IF POSSIBLE. 6. Landfill Citizens Advisory Committee K. CONSENT AGENDA ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD .TO BE ROUTINE AND WII.L BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY. R-81490-8 HCN MOTION TO APPROVE RESO URC 1. Approval of Minutes -June 26, 1990, July 10, 1990, July 24, 1990. 2. Acknowledgement from the Virginia Department of Transportation of the acceptance of 0.29 mile of Countrywood Drive (Route 1999) and sections of Route 612 into the Secondary System. A-81490-8a 3. Acceptance of water and sanitary sewer facilities serving Kingston Court, Section 2. A-81490-8b 4. Resolution requesting changes in the Secondary System due to relocation and reconstruction of Old Mill Road. R-81490-8c 5. Acceptance of water and sanitary sewer facilities serving "The Park" at Valleypointe Phase II, Building C. A-81490-8d 6. Donation of water line easements across Lots 10 and 11, Section 8, La Bellevue. A-81490-Se 7. Donation of drainage easement from Hugh H. Wells and Margaret H. Wells -Chaparral Drive Project. A-81490-8f 8. Donation of drainage easements in connection with the Givens Avenue Drainage Project and the Alleghany Drive Project. A-81490-8g 9. Donation of drainage easement through Lots 10, 11, 13, Block 2, North Hills Subdivision - Greenway Drive. A-81490-8h 10. Donation of sanitary sewer and drainage easements in connection with the Grandin Road Extension Project. A-81490-8i 11. Donation of a drainage easement from Lawrence R. Morgan and Michele Maureen Morgan -Wing Commander Drive Project. A-81490-8i L. CITIZENS' COMII~NTS AND COMMUNICATIONS s 1. JOHN M. STACEY, 115 TAMPA DR, ROANOKE SPOKE REGARDING THE ZONING LAW WHICH REQUIItES PARIHNG REC 'VEHICLES BEHIND THE BiJILDING LOT LINE. ADVISED THAT THIS IS IlVIPOSSIBLE WITH MANY LOTS AND COSTS TO STORE ARE TOO EXPENSIVE. BLJ ADVISED THAT PMM IS RESEARCHING AND WILL REPORT BACK TO BOARD. IN RESPONSE TO QUESTIONS, PMM ADVISED THAT VIOLATIONS WII~L NOT RECEIVE FORMAL ACTION WHILE ORDINANCE IS BEING STUDIED. M. REPORTS BLJ MOTION TO RECEIVE AND FILE FOLLOWING DISCUSSION OF ITEMS 5, 6,AND7-UW 1. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance 2. General Fund Unappropriated Balance 3. Board Contingency Fund 4. Accounts Paid -June 1990 5. Report on new financial system. 6. Report on contingency plan for possible state reduction of local funding. 7. Report on Street Light Replacement Program N. EXECUTIVE SESSION pursuant to the Code of Virginia Section 2.1-344 (a) (~ TO DISCUSS A LEGAL MATTER REQUIRING THE 9 PROVISION OF LEGAL ADVICE AND BRIEFING BY STAFF CONCERNING NEGOTIATIONS WITH RESPECT TO AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN ROANOKE CITY, ROANOKE COUNTY AND THE VIRGINIA TECH REAL ESTATE FOUNDATION INC. BLOT MOTION AT 5:30 P.M. TO GO INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION AYES-LBE,SAM,BI,,T,HCN NAYS-RWR OPEN SESSION AT 630 O. CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE SESSION 4 R-8149011 RWR MOTION 1'O ADOPT RESO URC P. ADJOirRNMENT BI{T MOTION TO ADJOURN AT 635 P.M. - UW io MEMORANDUM DATE: August 14, 1990 TO: Roa oke C~tyy~B, oard of Supervisors FROM: Elmer C. Hodge, Jr. County Administrator RE: Report from SDN Market Research At the request of several members of the Board, I had staff review the preliminary documents provided by the Roanoke Valley Business Council from the report on consolidation prepared by SDN Market Research. I spoke to Carl Marshall, the author of the report and invited him to visit us, since he spent some time with the financial personnel in the City. The SDN report was written without any input from Roanoke County and without an understanding of our financial reporting methods. Although the figures were obtained from the Auditor of Public Accounts for the state, they contain some inherent problems which must be addressed. SDN has used this information in a manner that I have never seen before, and while the comparisons are interesting, they are meaningless as a financial analysis. o The report uses resident personal income as a measure of the ability to pay for local government services. In common municipal accounting practices, this figure is not used. The bond rating agencies generally look at the number of people residing in a locality and the assessed value of real estate in determining whether a burden of debt is appropriate. Both Roanoke County and Roanoke City have the same AA bond ratings, reflecting their strong fiscal positions. o Mr. Marshall said that the figures on personal income are based on information from the United States Bureau of the Census. If the County's local government 1 revenues, expenditures and debt service have decreased since 1981 in comparison with the personal income of the residents, that means that the tax burden on our citizens has decreased since 1981. It also reflects the relatively affluent condition of our residents. According to figures we obtained from the Center for Public Service, the per capita income in the County rose from $16,652 in 1987 to $17,765 in 1988 - an increase of $1113. During the same period, the per capita income in the City rose from $15,245 to $15,993 - an increase of only $748. o Roanoke County is a very efficiently run government. Our motto has been "We ~~ do more for less , and the period since 1981 has seen the greatest increase in County services ever. In the last five years alone, we have built a new junior high school, implemented free curbside garbage pickup for every homeowner, added 355 acres of park land, completed a fire station in Back Creek, joined in building the Cave Spring Rescue Squad facility, built the joint library at Blue Ridge, made plans for a fire station at Read Mountain, started a police department, increased the school system's budget by the largest amount ever, sited a landfill and participated in the expansion of the Regional Airport. Part of our success has been cooperative ventures, such as those with Botetourt County, and we will continue with that in the future. The statement that a) the County has failed to deliver across-the-board local government services commensurate with the area's ability to pay for them; and/or b) embarked on a path of deferred maintenance in service expenditures" is incorrect. We provide more services than almost any County in the State of Virginia, such as curbside garbage pick up and recycling and an outstanding school system. The consultant should visit and review our operations and facilities before drawing this type of conclusion. o Paragraph four indicates that the indebtedness of a municipality is a surrogate for taxpayer risk exposure -which it is. However, the report then compares the indebtedness to general revenues, which is not standard accounting practice. Again, bond rating agencies use population and assessed value of real estate for this comparison. Attachment I shows a comparison on this basis with 1990 figures for the City and the County. o Although the report concludes that consolidation will reduce local government expenditures in the next ten years, it does not address the unfunded start-up costs of RMG. o I am not in a position to comment on the statements contained in paragraphs 8 and 9, since no information is provided on the data used in reaching these conclusions. 2 Roanoke County is doing more for its citizens than ever before, and meeting the growth demands of the County does cost money. We have addressed those needs economically and in a regional manner. If the SDN figures are correct, and our citizens' income has risen more rapidly than our cost of providing services, that is good news for Roanoke County. During the consolidation negotiations, we were all impressed with the financial health of both Roanoke City and Roanoke County. Neither of these communities is in any danger of being unable to provide services to its citizens, whether or not consolidation is approved by the voters. It is inappropriate to criticize the financial management or strengths of either locality. cc: Warner N. Dalhouse, Chairman Roanoke Valley Business Council Carl Marshall SDN Market Research 3 a ~z 0 Ow A ~ M z O ~'' O z$~ o~ ~o ~O O~ O ~ o0 ~ ~~ u a _ O ~ Q o$ g o cp~~o ~ p4 o r+ a ~ ~ ~ ~o ~ ~p trj N M O ~ ~ ~ ~ vi N N ~O ~O 00 N ~C ~ 69 O ~ ~ Q ~ N~ .-+ N a ~, c°`~g 0 ~~ o~ a ~ i i g o O l~ M [~ v'~ M ~ N ~ ~ 0 0 [~ N ~ ~ big O~0 ~ ~ a~ ~ N ~ Q ~ a y~ ~ A 'O ~ ~ ~ '~ .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ °` o ~ " ~ ~~ o Q~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ Hv y ~ ~ a O~ y .~ Roanoke Valley BUSINESS COUNCIL PO. Box 13327 Roanoke. Virgirna 24040 ~703~563-6646 August 9, 1990 Mr. Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator County of Roanoke P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, Virginia 24018-0798 Dear Elmer: Today, the Roanoke Valley Business Council made public preliminary findings by a consultant on the economic impact consolidation would have on the cost of government. I think you will be interested in the enclosed results. Sincerely, ..GJ~~"- Warner N. Dalhouse Chairman WND:ba Enclosures SDN MARKET RESEARCH o SDN Market Research is a division of Smith Demer Normann, LTD. of Hampton, Virginia. (804) 865-9610. o The firm has expertise in real estate economics, city planning, business administration, public administration, research and statistics. Clients include governments, institutions, industry and private organizations. o An owner of the firm and project manager is Carl H. Marshall, who has prepared the economic feasibility study for the Roanoke Valley Business Council. o Among other research projects Mr. Marshall has managed: - Economic Impact of Chesapeake Bay Preservation Act on Local Government in Tidewater - Caroline County Fiscal Impact Model - Intergovernmental Services Delivery in Southeastern Virginia - Georgetown Waterfront Master Plan - Waterside Festival Marketplace, and Omni International Hotel in Norfolk - Omni International Hotel and mixed use complexes in Atlanta and Miami - Chesapeake Crescent Common Market - Year 2000 Plan for Downtown Norfolk o Mr. Marshall has been certified as an expert in real estate economics and public policy by judicial bodies in Virginia, Washington, D.C., and Maryland. He has served as keynote speaker and served on panels and seminars addressing real estate market, investment and development issues affecting public policy for such organizations as the National Association of Industrial and Office Parks, Council for Urban Economic Development, the International Council of Shopping Centers, and the National Association of Home Builders. PRELIMINARY FINDINGS Key findings of the SDN Market Research analysis of the economic and fiscal impact of the proposed Roanoke Metropolitan Government (RMG) consolidation on the City of Roanoke and Roanoke County are summarized below. l._ Resident personal income is a surrogate measure identifying the ability of an area's residents to pay for local government services. 2. Between 1981 and 1988, the City of Roanoke's local government revenues, expenditures, and debt service increased relative to total personal income of its resident population. During the equivalent eight year period, Roanoke County's local government revenues, expenditures, and debt service decreased in comparison to the personal income of its resident population. 3. Unless arguments for superior efficiency in municipal services delivery between 1981-1988 can be effectively advanced for Roanoke County relative to the City of Roanoke and other jurisdictions like Virginia Beach and Chesapeake---especially in a period of scaled back Federal government transfer payments to support municipal services nationwide---it would appear that: a) the County has failed to deliver across-the-board local government services commensurate with the area's ability to pay for them; and/or b) embarked on a path of deferred maintenance in service expenditures. 4. For Virginia's local governments, the balance of unfunded debt at the end of each fiscal year equals gross debt less restricted funds. The balance represents that amount required to fund the outstanding balance of indebtedness from local government revenues. It is also a surrogate for taxpayer risk exposure. 5. In 1988, Roanoke City's balance of unfunded debt equalled $55.4 million compared to $57.6 million in 1981. Roanoke City's unfunded debt as a percent of total revenue declined from 110.5 percent in 1981 to 77.4 percent in 1988. 6. A reverse relationship has been experienced by Roanoke County. In 1988, Roanoke County's balance of unfunded debt equalled $50.8 million compared to $20.1 million in 1981. Roanoke County's unfunded debt as a percent of total revenues increased from 55.1 percent in 1981 to 99.8 percent in 1988. 7. A pro-forma financial analysis of the consequences of RMG implementation compared to the no-action option has been prepared by SDN Market Research. A ten-year spreadsheet comparing local government expenditures and revenues with and without consolidation has been prepared by the consultant. 8. It is likely that RMG implementation will lower both per capita expenditures and revenue requirements for local government compared to the non-consolidation option for the time period of 1993-2002. Increased operating efficiency in local government with consolidation is equated with reduced per capita expenditures and revenue requirements in the initial years. 9. Key conclusions of the SDN Market Research pro forma financial analysis of RMG consolidation compared to the status quo include: a. RMG consolidation will reduce local government expenditures by at least $29,523,000 during the time period 1993 to 2002 in constant 1990 dollars (excluding inflation). b. RMG consolidation will reduce general property taxes by almost $10,000,000 in the first ten years after program implementation. c. At least $.68 of each $1.00 saved with RMG consolidation will be in real estate taxes, principally benefiting the area's homeowners. d. RMG consolidation can deliver equal or better municipal services to each resident of the City and County between 1993 and 2002 for $51 less per person than the status quo option. e. Total taxpayer savings with RMG implementation are estimated at $12,000,000 in the first ten years. A N ~. F a ~ ~- 9 z 18 ~ 88 `EE~t/1CEN7ENN~~~ ~ Brwwti~ul Br~w~~eg C~o~znf~ of ~ottnakr ROANOKE COUNrI'Y BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA AUGUST 14, 1990 ALL-AMERICA Ct1Y • ' is ~~9~8~9 Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Meeting. ~ Regular meetings are held on the second Tuesday and the fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public hearings are held at 7:00 p.m on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.) 1. Roll Call. 2. Invocation: The Reverend Sam Crews Coopers Cove Baptist Church 3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag. B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, •ADD TO, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS C. PROCIAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS, AND AWARDS 1. Resolution of Appreciation to Hope Patsel upon her retirement. i 2. Recognition of Diane Hyatt and Paul Grice for receiving the Government Finance Officers Association Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting D. NEW BUSINESS 1. Presentation on Roanoke County Recycling. 2. Request to accept and appropriate two grants on behalf of the Department of Social Services. 3. Acceptance of a grant by the County Library for a Literacy Program. 4. Approval of amendments to Employee Handbook concerning Police Department employees E. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS F. REQUEST FOR WORK SESSIONS 1. Joint Work Session with Planning Commission G. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance requesting vacation of a 50 foot right-of~vay referred to as "Goff Road" recorded in Plat Book 3, Page 59, and located in the Catawba Magisterial District. 2. Ordinance authorizing Deed of Exchange and Partial Release of easement for water facilities at Tanglewood 2 Mall. H. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance imposing or increasing user fees for the Parks and Recreation Department. (CONTINUED FROM JULY 24, 1990). I. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS 1. Request from Supervisor Nickens for Board member attendance at the National Institute of Justice Program. J. APPOINTMENTS 1. Board of Zoning Appeals 2. Building Code Board of Adjustments and Appeals 3. Community Corrections Resource Board 4. Grievance Panel 5. Industrial Development Authority 6. Landfill Citizens Advisory Committee K. CONSENT AGENDA .ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE• BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND 3 WII.L BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY. 1. Approval of Minutes -June 26, 1990, July 10, 1990, July 24, 1990. 2. Acknowledgement from the Virginia Department of Transportation of the acceptance of 0.29 mile of Countrywood Drive (Route 1999) and sections of Route 612 into the Secondary System. 3. Acceptance of water and sanitary sewer facilities serving Kingston Court, Section 2. 4. Resolution requesting changes in the Secondary System due to relocation and reconstruction of Old Mill Road. 5. Acceptance of water and sanitary sewer facilities serving "The Park" at Valleypointe Phase II, Building C. 6. Donation of water line easements across Lots 10 and 11, Section 8, La Bellevue. 7. Donation of drainage easement from Hugh H. Wells and Margaret H. Wells -Chaparral Drive Project. 8. Donation of drainage easements in connection with the Givens Avenue Drainage Project and the Alleghany Drive Project. 9. Donation of drainage easement through Lots 10, 11, 13, Block 2, North Hills Subdivision - Greenway Drive. 10. Donation of sanitary sewer and drainage easements in 4 connection with the Grandin Road Extension Project. 11. Donation of a drainage easement from Lawrence R. Morgan and Michele Maureen Morgan -Wing Commander Drive Project. L. CITIZENS' COMII~NTS AND CONiMiJNICATIONS M. REPORTS 1. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance 2. General Fund Unappropriated Balance 3. Board Contingency Fund 4. Accounts Paid -June 1990 5. Report on new financial system. 6. Report on contingency plan for possible state reduction of local funding. 7. Report on Street Light Replacement Program N. EXECUTIVE SESSION pursuant to the Code of Virginia Section 2.1-344 (a) O. CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE SESSION P. ADJOURNMENT 5 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 14, 1990 RESOLUTION 81490-1 EXPRESSING THE APPRECIATION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY TO HOPE P. PATSEL FOR THIRTY YEARS OF SERVICE TO ROANORE COUNTY WHEREAS, Hope P. Patsel was first employed in March of 1960 as a Real Estate Clerk in the Commissioner of the Revenue's Office, and WHEREAS, Hope P. Patsel has also served as Account Clerk II, Real Estate Clerk III and Real Estate Clerk Supervisor, and WHEREAS, in 1986 and 1987, in honor of her many accomplishments and dedicated service, Mrs. Patsel was twice named the Departmental Employee of the Year from the Commissioner of the Revenue's Office, and WHEREAS, in 1987, she was chosen as the Roanoke County Employee of the Year, recognizing her excellence in performance of job duties and display of service to the public and to fellow employees, and WHEREAS, through her employment with Roanoke County, Hope P. Patsel has been instrumental in improving the quality of life for its citizens. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County expresses its deepest appreciation and the appreciation of the citizens of Roanoke County to HOPE P. PATSEL for thirty years of capable, loyal, and dedicated service to Roanoke County. FURTHER, the Board of Supervisors does express its best wishes for a happy, restful and productive retirement. On motion of Supervisor Nickens, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: -~./V Mary H. A len, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File D. Keith Cook, Director, Human Resources Resolutions of Appreciation File C- AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 14, 1990 RESOLUTION EXPRESSING THE APPRECIATION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY TO HOPE P. PATSEL FOR 30 YEARS OF SERVICE TO ROANORE COUNTY WHEREAS, Hope P. Patsel was first employed in March of 1960 as a Real Estate Clerk in the Commissioner of the Revenue's Off ice, and WHEREAS, Hope P. Patsel has also served as Account Clerk II, Real Estate Clerk III and Real Estate Clerk Supervisor, and WHEREAS, in 1986 and 1987, in honor of her many accomplishments and dedicated service, Mrs. Patsel was twice named the Departmental Employee of the Year from the Commissioner of the Revenue's Office, and WHEREAS, in 1987, she was chosen as the Roanoke County Employee of the Year, recognizing her excellence in performance of job duties and display of service to the public and to fellow employees, and WHEREAS, through her employment with Roanoke County, Hope P. Patsel has been instrumental in improving the quality of life for its citizens. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County. expresses its deepest appreciation and the appreciation of the citizens of Roanoke County to HOPE P. PATSEL for thirty years of capable, loyal, and dedicated service to Roanoke County. FURTHER, the Board of Supervisors does express its best wishes for a happy, restful and productive retirement. ACTION NO. A-8~~90/-2 ITEM NUMBER ~ -` l AT A REGULAR HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY UADMINISTRATIONRCENNTER COUNTY, VIRGINIA MEETING DATE: August 14, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: Proposal to Organize a Recycling Advisory Committee COUNTY ADMINISTRATORS COMMENTS: B_ACRGROUND: The Virginia Department of Waste Management has recently set forth a mandate requiring all localities to implement a comprehensive solid waste plan. 10~eoflthe mwaste stream by 1991,115~o byc1993e goals of recycling and 25~ by 1995. Roanoke County took the lead in recycling in the Commonwealth more than three years ago. Members of the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors had the foresight to agree to participate in what became the first curbside source separation recycle collection program on the east coast. With the cooperation of the Clean Valley Council, Cycle Systems Inc., and the Division of Mines, Minerals and Energy, the pilot program was initiated in southwest Roanoke County. The program was a success with volunteer participation averaging 32~ and an overall participation on a monthly basis of some 89~. The County has a very aggressive solid waste program for the current year. In addition to servicing some 25,500 residents weekly, the planning and program expansion includes the following: 1. Write comprehensive plan (on-going). 2. Test twice monthly curbside collection (July 1, 1990). 3. Test commingled monthly collection (October 1990). 4. Field two new automated systems (November 1990). 5. Investigate mobile drop-off stations (on-going). '°' All test results and analysis will be completed in the fall, board approval will be obtained and the comprehensive solid waste plan incorporated in the FY 91-92 budget process. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION Presently, the County operates a curbside source separation recycling program. Approximately 1,750 homes participate on a weekly basis and another 150 homes participate on a new twice monthly test basis. Both of these groups are placing newspaper, aluminum, and glass at the curb in three stackable bins. Recycling has become a major priority activity for the County staff. A full-time position of Solid Waste Project Specialist has been identified and filled specifically to address and handle the planning and execution of recycle issues. In addition, a three man team "Think Tank", including the Project Specialist, has been assembled to do the following: - write and coordinate comprehensive plan - develop a commercial recycle program - field the new systems The active civic leagues in the Cherokee Hills and Fort Lewis areas were very helpful in the implementation of the program in their areas. Using the civic league members for this project saved staff manpower, time, and postage during the distribution and promotion of the program. The County staff has established community recycle programs which are in several locations. All of these programs have been initiated by citizen groups, coordinated with the Clean Valley Council, and supported by the County. Examples of on-going programs are as follows: 1. Fort Lewis Elementary School is collecting recyclables and delivering the materials to the recycle truck which is parked on the school grounds once a week. 2. Friendship Manor has a weekly pick-up schedule of materials collected and separated by the senior citizens. 3. Mount Pleasant has a community collection point where residents bring the recyclables and leave them for periodic pick-up by the County. 4. Hollins College has requested recycle support for the school year beginning September 1990. This program will involve weekly pick-up of recyclable materials at a designated point on campus. 2 -~- 5. Stonehenge Condominiums has requested twice monthly collection. The vehicle will be left on the grounds overnight. 6. The Catawba area will receive the truck once a month for the collection of recyclables. The truck will be parked overnight. 7. County Building recycling is being developed where it is not being accomplished with Cycle Systems. A test program with the courthouse has begun, if successful the procedures will be adapted to all buildings. There are several committees and forums currently active in the Roanoke Valley solid waste planning and execution. Below is a list of such organizations/activities: 1. Landfill Management Board - regulatory board for the landfill. 2. Landfill Citizens Advisory Committee -formed to evaluate sites for the new landfill. 3. Clean Valley Council - a non-profit cooperative agency involved in recycling education and litter control. 4. 5th PDC - commission representing surrounding localities currently working regional aspects of solid waste plan. 5. Recycle Roanoke Committee - sub-committee of Clean Valley Council. The board approved the 1989-90 solid waste program which included directions to approach recycling on a valley-wide basis. Under the chairmanship of the County, the Roanoke Valley-Wide Recycle Committee was formed. This committee has solid waste representation from the County, Roanoke City, Salem City, Town of Vinton, Clean Valley Council, 5th PDC, and the Landfill Staff. The staff does plan to ask for citizen review and input on the Comprehensive Solid Waste Plan which will include our recycle plans. It is felt that the desired level of community participation in the planning and execution can be attained through the existing committees and boards who have knowledgeable membership, County staff and County residents. FISCAL IMPACT None 3 STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends no change in the committee structure. pe fully submitted: Appro ed ;~~ -_ ~~ vim,,,,,/ rdner W. Smith, Director Elmer C. Department of General Services County ACTION VOTE by: / ~~~~' Hodge Administrator No Yes Abs Approved (x) Motion by: Lee B. Eddy to x Denied ( ) create a Recyclina Committ~dy Received ( ) and Countv Administrator Johnson x x Referred ( ) to bring back recommenda- McGraw To tions for membership Nickens x Robers x cc: File Gardner Smith, Director, General Services John Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator 4 A-81490-3 ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER ~ ~~' AT A REGULAR MEETING THE ROANOKER COUNTY ADMINISTRATIONRO LATER COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT MEETING DATE: August 14, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: Request to accept and appropriate two grants on behalf of the Department of Social Services COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: J ~"' BACKGROUND• The Department of Social Services for theFC al h ffVRrginia has applied for and been approved by the Common ro rams. for grants to help in the funding of public assistaroved by the One grant in the amount of $6,954, has been app Commonwealth of Virginia, Department of Social Services for a community based Foster Care Prevention Program. This program funds a volunteer parent aid program in which volunteers work with parents who have abused or neglected their lacement not these suspected of doing so, thus preventing the p children into a normal foster care environment. There are presently three parent aides working with cases and recruitment, and training of at least three more being initiated. The second grant has been received from the Commonwealth of Virginia, Department of Health and Human Services in thyehachuhelps $2,288 for an Independent Livinbetweenafoster ca re and the ability teenage children bridge the gap to live on their own. T seroe o ed to one lastgyeareenagers, aged 16 plus, in foster care a pp FISCAL IMPACT• Each of these grants is 100 reimbursable and requires no new local monies. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the two grants referenced above be accepted by the County of Roanoke and that appropriations (revenue and expenditure) be approved to authorize the spending of these grant monies. Respectfully submitted, John M. Chamb iss, Jr. Assistant Administrator Approved by, i J c'-c/ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator -- ------------- ---- --~----------- VOTE -------- ------- ACTION No Yes Abs Approved (x) Motion by. Steven A. McGraw x Denied ( ) to accept grants Eddy x Received ( ) Johnson McGraw x Referred ( ) Nickens x To ( ) Robers x cc: File John Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator Betty Lucas, Director, Director, Social Services Reta Busher, Director, Management & Budget Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance ACTION NO. A-81490-4 .~ - 3 ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF R~ANOKER COUNTY ADMINISTRAT ONROENTER COUNTY; VIRGINIA HELD AT THE MEETING DATE: August 14, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: Acceptance of a Grant by the County Library for a Literacy Program COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: t_: L BACKGROUND• The County of Roanoke Public Library ha hlandnCorporationhto it has received a $1,000 grant from the Sout assist in funding a Litera420 board booksn(booksewith mcardboard application, approximately rovided to area pages for use with babies and toddlers) would be p hospitals and pre-natal clinicsdesi natedlbacrossd the gcountry oas week in.November, which is g Children's Book Week. Theddantalblicati nufor as library cardlfor concerning the program an PP hiloso h that use by the parents. The project is based on the p P Y babies + books = readers. With this project we hope to encourage parents who are not librar s uthat it iss nevere t o early to stardt also like to remind parent reading to their children. FISCAL IMPACT• This grant requires no local dollar match and an appropriation is requested to recognize the revenue and expenditure, so that the appropriate books and materials may be purchased. ALTERNATIVES: STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the acceptance of said grant and appropriate $1,000 revenue and expenditures for said purchase. ~ -3 Respectfully submitted, Approved by, ~~ John M. Chambli s, Jr. Elmer C. Hodge Assistant Administrator County Administrator -------------- ------------------------------- VOTE Approved (X ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) ACTION Motion by: Harry C. Nickens to accept grant No Yes Abs Eddy x Johnson x McGraw x Nickens x Robers ~ cc: File John Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator George Garretson, Director, Libraries Reta Busher, Director, Management & Budget Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance ACTION NUMBER A-81490-5 ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MLD AT THE ROANOKEA COUNTY ADMINISOTRP,TOIONRCENOTER COUNTY, VIRGINIA HE MEETING DATE: August 14, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: Amendments to Employee Handbook for Police Department COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR' S COMMENTS : ~ ~wv~ y''r;~~"% ~vG~C ')~' 1/Y7 7 ~~ SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Board of Supervisors approved the establishment of a Police Department effective July 1, 1990. The Department of Human Resources and adeetoDtherRoanokeoCountylEmployee Handbookat two amendments be m The first amendment to the Employee Handbook provides certain procedural guarantees to employees of the Roanoke County Police Department who serve in a sworn law enforcement capacity. These procedural guarantees are required by Title 2.1 of the Code of Virginia and apply whenever an officer is subjected to an interrogation which could lead to dismissal, demotion, suspension or transfer for punitive reasons. Employees in the Fire and Rescue Department are covered by similar procedural guarantees which are already included in the Employee Handbook. The recommended amendment to the Employee Handbook is attached for your consideration. The second amendment to the Employee Handbook pertains to disciplinary action. The Department of Human Resources recommends that Chapter IV-Conduct of the Employee Handbook be amended to include suspension of more than five work days but not more than twenty-one work days with the concurrence of the Director of Human Resources. Application of an extended disciplinary suspension would depend on amendment to theeEmployee Handbook ish attachedlfor The recommended your consideration. FISCAL IMPACT: No additional appropriation of funds is required for the fiscal year 1990/91. RECOMMENDATIONS: It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors approve the attached amendments to the Employee Handbook. ~~ SUBMITTED BY: D. K. Cook Director of Human Resources APPROVED BY: v "" Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs x Approved (x) Motion By: Lee B. Eddy to Ed y Denied ( ) a rove Johnson x Received ( ) McGraw x Referred ( ) Nickens x Robers x To cc: File D. Keith Cook, Director, Human Resources John Cease, Chief, Police Department °7 AMENDMENT TO THE ROANOKE COUNTY EMPLOYEE HANDBOOK CHAPTER IV G. Procedural Guarantees Roanoke Count Police De artment em to ees who serve in a sworn law enforcement ca acity are eligible for certain procedural guarantees rovided by Title 2 1 of the Code of Virginia. The rocedural uarantees a 1 to an sworn officer other than the Chief of Polic sts and whohis a non 1 robat onar member'hoflthe b law to make arre Police Department. Theses tions interrogation whip or transfer for pc be found in Chapi 1950, as amended, a ply whenever an officer i 'h could lead to dismissal, de nitive reasons These procedu er 10 1 of Title 2 1 of the ~Pr.tions 2.1-116.1 through 2.1 s subjected to an motion, suspension ral guarantees can Code of Virginia, -116.9. Roanoke County employees who are firefighters or emergency medical technicians are eligible for certain procedural guarantees provided by state law. These protections apply whenever a firefighter or emergency medical technician is subjected to an interrogation which could lead to dismissal, demotion, or suspension for punitive reasons. These procedural guarantees can be found in Chapter 10.1:1 of Title 2.1-116.9:1 through 2.1-116.9:5. If you h al auarantees~ncontactsthe Department of HumanaResourcese procedur g Amendment #90-3 (amendment underlined) -~ AMENDMENT TO ROANOKE COUNTY EMPLOYEE HANDBOOK CHAPTER IV C. Disciplinary Action Sus~ens ions Suspensions are normally issued for violations which include, but are not limited to failure to follow a supervisors instructions or perform assigned work, failure to abi olio iesafreporting tolwork failure to abide by established county p under the influence of alcohol or illegal substances, leunexcused workplace without permission during workingro ert nor records, absences, unauthorized use or misuse of county p p Y sleeping during working hours, and when the second active written reprimand is issued. Disciplinary action for such violations will normally result in suspension of not more tnPrniPnd nQ wupon dthe specified by the supervisor without pay. circumstances and severit of the offense a sus ension of more one work davs may be than five work days but not more than twenty- a roved with concurrence of the Director of Human Resources Suspension notices remain active for thirty-six months. A copy of the written suspension notice is given to the employee and a copy is placed in the employee's personnel file. At t the written written suspension notice is issued to an employee, suspension notice will indicate the nature of the misconduct (i.e. failure to follow a supervisors instructions) and the employee will be allowed to provide an explanation for the misconduct. At the end of the active period, suspension notices are removed froosese employee's personnel file and retained only for archival purp The retention schedule retent only schedule 1 established llbybethe accordance with the Commonwealth of Virginia. Amendment #90-4 (amendment underlined) 1 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. ~ ~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BO OKE COUNTY RADMINISTRAT ON CENTER COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROAN MEETING DATE: August 8, 1990 Joint Work Session/Retreat of the Board of AGENDA ITEM' Commission Supervisors and Planning COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND' The Board and Commission have individually discussed the e to hold a joint work sessioninclude t to discuss major desir planning related issues. These issues .. Zoning Ordinance Revisions, Comprehensive Plan Update, Roanoke River Corridor Study Implementation, Capital Improvement Program, The Explore Project, ram and, ,. Regional Stormwater Management Prog Rezoning Issues The Board is invited to suggest additional topics as well. A Friday night/Saturday retreat in August threenweekends bn the Commission. Due to conflicting schedules, tember have now been identified as possible dates for the work Sep session. These dates are: September 14 and 15 September 21 and 22 September 28 and 29 local hotel with conference facilities is the proposed A location. ~- / 2 FISCAL IMPACT 800.00 for Similar work sessions have cost approximately $ and meals. The cost of the proposed work session will facilities ets of the Planning Commission and the operating budg ro riation is required. be shared by the Board of Supervisors. No additional app STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends as follows: 1. That the Board of Supervisors select one of the above kends as the date for the joint Commission/Board work listed wee session. Respectfully submitted, Harrin on Terrance L• and Zoning Director of Plann' g Action Approved ( ) Motion by Denied Received ( ) Referred to ~ Approved, ,~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator Vote No Yes Abs Eddy Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers ACTION # _ _________.__- _ _ _. ITEM NUMBER G_"'__~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING_D_ATE:. August 14, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: First reading of the Ordinance requesting of a 50 foot right-of-way referred to as "Goff Road" intersection with Webster Drive, west, approximately recorded in Plat Book 3, Page 59, Catawba Magisterial COUNTY_ADMINISTRATOR'S__COMMENT$__ EXECUTIVE _SUMMARY_ a vacation from i t' s 197 feet, District. The Petitioner's, Mr. Hartwell Philips and Mrs. Violet Moomaw Hull, are requesting that the Board of Supervisors vacate a portion of an unapproved right-of-way referred to as "Goff Road", as shown on the attached map. BACKGROUND Several years ago Mr. Hartwell Philips made a request to Roanoke County to vacate "Goff Road" however, the Board of Supervisors denied his request because the Bennett Land had not been developed. Since that date. the property to the west (Bennett Land) has been developed, referred to as Barrens Village, with access being provided by way of Barrens Road and Deer Branch Road thus eliminating the need for this portion of the right-of-way. SUMMARY_OF__INFORMATION Roanoke County is requesting that the described right-of Code be vacated in accordance with Chapter 11, Title 15.1-482 (b), of Virginia, 1950, as amended, by the adoption of the attached Ordinance. The Departments of Engineering and Utility have commented that they have no objection to the proposed vacation. ~ -/ The F i rst Reading of the Ordinance i s schedu 1 ed for August 14 , 1990; Public Hearing and Second Reading is scheduled for August 28, 1990. STAFF RECOMMENDATION The County Staff recommends that Board of Supervisors adopt the proposed Ordinance to vacate the referenced right-of-way. PECTFULLY SUBMITTED BY: __ Arno d Covey Development and Ins ections Director APPROVED BY: r ~--- -- ~ Elmer C. Ho ge County Administrator -------------- ------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by : _ __.___--__-- --- No Yes Abs Eddy -- -----. Denied ( ) -----__- - _ _----- ----__--__ Received ( ) Johnson ---- ----- ------- --------- Referred McGraw ----- ---- ---------- ._. -- -"- -- -- N i c ke n s ---- -- -_ ------ Robers ~~ '_- __ _ _ ~ _ 0~ ~[ I M • J ~ ~ `f _ .1-..- • ~ ~~. i l -- ~ i~,~, OAy ~•p ! ,, I tJ ` Ems" ~~. n,a [ ~' / as K ~fi~[ F~ ~, "1~~.~4~ _ 4~~ ~ ~ ~s ~~SF~R Y ~ U ~..av~r~c•u..,-ucs ~ ' ` r`~i rar N,~i "~ ~...- `7p •~•• ~ ~MJ7~R :.:DGc s --a gam' ~ VlC1N1TY ~A~' ,~„~°~~~ " COblMUNITYSBRYICBS vacate a 50 AND DBVSLOPlNBNT a p p rox i ma t e l y i NORTB right-of-way • .. ~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 14, 1990 ORDINANCE VACATING A 50 FOOT RIGHT-OF-WAY REFERRED TO AS "GOFF ROAD" FROM ITS INTERSECTION WITH WEBSTER DRIVE, WEST, APPROXIMATELY 197 FEET, IN THE CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, the subdivision plat for North Burlington Heights Subdivision recorded in Plat Book 3, page 59, provided for an extension of Goff Road for a distance of approximately 197 feet in a southwesterly direction for access to the "Bennett" property; and WHEREAS, with the subsequent development of the "Bennett" property as the Barrens Village Subdivision, access to this property has been provided by way of Barrens Road and Deer Branch Road thereby eliminating the need for the above referenced right- of-way; and WHEREAS, notice has been given pursuant to § 15.1-431 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, clearly describing the plat or portion thereof to be vacated and the time and place of the meeting of the Board of Supervisors at which the adoption of this ordinance would be voted upon as required by § 15.1-482 of the Code of Virginia; and WHEREAS, a first reading of the proposed ordinance was held on August 14, 1990; the second reading was held on August 28, 1990. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That a 50 foot right-of way approximately 197 feet in length extending from Webster Drive in a southwesterly direction ~l and designated as an extension of Goff Road, as recorded in Plat Book 3, page 59, located in the Catawba Magisterial District, is hereby vacated. 2. That the County Administrator is authorized to execute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County as are necessary to accomplish the vacation of the said right-of- way, all of which shall be upon form approved by the County Attorney. 3. That a certified copy of this ordinance of vacation shall be recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia after the time for appeal of the adoption of this ordinance has expired, or in the event of any such appeal, upon the denial of such appeal, as provided by § 15.1-482, Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended. 4. The effective date of this ordinance shall be August 28, 1990. ACTION # ITEM NUMBER G AT A REGULAR MEELDNAT THEHROANOKE COUNTYEADMINISTRATIONNOENTER COUNTY, VIRGINIA H MEETING DATE: August 14, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: Deed of Exchange and Partial Release of Easement for Water Facilities at Tanglewood Mall COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND' On April 15, 1987, MRI Tanglewood Rental Inveasementslto.Roanoke a 0.041-acre parcel of land and appurtenant County for the purpose of installing a water pump station. The pump station has not been constructed because the City of Roanoke cannot at this time supply additional water at this point. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Chesapeake and Potomac Telephone Company wants to install an underground telephone vault and equipment in the location of the above mentioned easement. The respective staff of Tanglewood, C & P and Roanoke County have developed a plan that will provide adequate space for the pump station, water line easement and the telephone equipment vault. This plan provides for Roanoke County to vacate a portion of the water line easement leading from Route 419 to the pump station parcel. Tanglewood will deed Roanoke County a new water line easement from Route 419 to the pump station that will not interfere with the location of the proposed C & P vault. While developing this plan, the surveyor found the original metes and bounds for the 0' fle t then correctbmetes randt boundsn of Dthe of Exchange will re parcel. FISCAL IMPACT' No expenditure of County funds will be required to effect this transaction. ,C .~ -.,~ STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors have the first reading of the attached ordinance, which authorizes the Deed of Exchange and Partial Release of the above mentioned property. It is further recomme aft rtaasecond r eadingfon August 29, 199 pt the attached ordinan SUBMITTED BY: Cliffo raig, P.E. Utility Director Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to APPROVED: ~I /' Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ACTION VOTE Motion by: No Yes Abs Eddy Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers t -- AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 14, 1990 ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A DEED OF EXCHANGE AND PARTIAL RELEASE OF EASEMENT FOR WATER FACILITIES AT TANGLEWOOD MALL WHEREAS, by Deed of Exchange and Partial Release dated April 15, 1987, recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, in Deed Book 1306, page 1966, MRI Tanglewood Rental Investments, Inc., a Delaware corportion [hereafter MRI Tanglewood], granted and conveyed to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County [hereafter Roanoke County] a 0.041- acre parcel of land and certain appurtenant easements, all in connection with the installation and operation of a water pump station by Roanoke County on the land so conveyed; and WHEREAS, The Chesapeake and Potomac Telephone Company of Virginia [hereafter C&P Telephone] has requested that MRI Tanglewood, convey to it an easement for the installation and operation of certain underground and aboveground communications equipment, which easement is at the same location as a part of the access easement conveyed to Roanoke County by MRI Tanglewood by the above-described deed dated April 15, 1987; and WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Department of Utilities has agreed to a relocation of the portion of its access easement which interferes with the easement being granted by MRI Tanglewood to C&P Telephone as described above; and WHEREAS, following recordation of the above-described deed dated April 15, 1987, it was discovered that errors had been made in the plat of subdivision by reference to which the conveyances ~~ in that deed had been made, with the result that the intentions of the parties were not carried out by the April 15, 1987, deed, and the parties thereto now wish to correct those errors by reconveyance to MRI Tanglewood of the erroneously conveyed property and conveyance to Roanoke County of the correct property; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Charter of Roanoke County, first and second readings are required to pass all ordinances; and WHEREAS, a first reading of the proposed ordinance was held on August 14, 1990; the second reading was held on August 28, 1990. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia as follows: 1. That the release of the 0.041-acree parcel and the appurtenant easements to MRI Tanglewood as described in the deed of April 15, 1987, in consideration of the conveyance of that certain 0.041-acre parcel of land as shown on the plat dated April 23, 1990, made by T.P. Parker & Son, entitled "Easement Plat for C&P Telephone Company. ," along with a perpetual easement for ingress and egress and a temporay construction easement is hereby authorized and approved. 2. That the County Administrator is authorized to execute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County as are necessary to accomplish the conveyance of this property, all of which shall be upon form approved by the County Attorney. 3. The effective date of this ordinance shall be August 29, 1990. h-I AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, AUGUST 14, 1990 ORDINANCE 81490-6 AUTHORIZING THE IMPOSING OR INCREASING OF CERTAIN FEES FOR SERVICES FOR PARRS AND RECREATION ACTIVITIES WHEREAS, on September 20, 1989, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, selected David M. Griffith and Associates, Ltd. to conduct a detailed cost/revenue study focusing upon an analysis of user fee services; and WHEREAS, the purpose of said user fee study was to calculate the full costs of providing specific services, compare costs with the revenues received for these services, and recommend fee levels to recover the full costs of services when such fees are practical; and WHEREAS, the Board has found that it is both equitable and efficient to ensure that those individuals who benefit from certain governmental services bear an appropriate portion of the cost thereof while reducing general service cost subsidies; and WHEREAS, as a result of said study the Board determined that it was in the public interest to increase certain user fees, as modified by staff recommendations, budget work sessions, and citizen comments in order to recover a portion of the direct and indirect costs of providing certain services as provided herein; and WHEREAS, the first reading on this ordinance was held on May 22, 1990, and the second reading on this ordinance was held on August 14, 1990. 1 _, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the Director of the Roanoke County Department of Parks and Recreation is hereby authorized to establish fees for parks and recreation services and activities, subject to the approval of the County Administrator, and subject to the following standards: a) Definitions: Indirect costs include the general fund appropriation for each of the cost centers associated with the recreation area based on the previous fiscal year budget, plus the allocation of the central administrative costs for the Department of Parks and Recreation, and in the case of athletics, the share of the ballfield maintenance, which is provided by the Parks Division of the Department. Direct costs relate to the specific costs of instructors and associated supplies. The registration fee is proposed to be established at $5 per participant, per activity and the membership fee is proposed to be $10 annually for senior citizens, in lieu of a registration fee. b) Standards• The standards, which were approved by the Parks & Recreation Advisory Commission, are as follows: 1) For activities included under community education: leisure arts, outdoor adventure and adult athletics, the fee shall be based upon a $5 registration fee, per participant, 2 plus 25% of the indirect cost, plus 100% of the direct cost. In any of the programs offered by these divisions primarily for youth under 18 years of age, there shall be no $5 per participant fee. 2) For youth athletics, in lieu of a $5 registration fee per participant, the participating recreation clubs and Department of Parks and Recreation may implement cost savings and cost sharing alternatives to offset the revenue which would have been generated through the suggested user fees. 3) For special events, the budget shall recover 40% of the indirect cost and 100% of the direct cost. 4) For therapeutics, there shall be a recovery of 20% of the direct cost. 5) For senior citizens, there shall be a $10 membership fee, plus 100% of direct cost associated with the program. 2. That the Director shall develop guidelines for the waiver or reduction of fees based upon demonstrable hardship and inability to pay and shall implement related policies. 3. That the effective date of this ordinance and for the imposition of the fees and charges authorized herein shall be August 14, 1990. On motion of Supervisor Nickens to approve ordinance amended by Supervisor Eddy, and that the fees be effective with the next sport season signups and next class signups, and that the County Administrator establish a citizen committee to study fees for the therapeutics program, and carried by the following recorded vote: 3 AYES: NAYS: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers None A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File John Chambliss, Assistant County Steve Carpenter, Director, Parks Reta Busher, Director, Managemen Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance Administrator & Recreation t & Budget 4 ACTION N0. ITEM NUMBER ~ -~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OFE ROANOKER COUNTY UADMINISTRATIONROC LATER COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT TH MEETING DATE: August 14, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: Second Reading of an Ordinance Imposing or Increasing User Fees for the Parks and Recreation Department COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: On July 24, 1990, the Board of Supervisors received comments concerning the imposition of certain Recreation fees, and particular concern was expressed about youth participation in or anized sports programs). programs other than youth athletics ( g Staff had previously met with officials fre they va f ve dollartper Clubs throughout the County to discuss, participant fee for youth athletics, or a reasonable alternative which could reduce the budget of the department .a ma°Opityi of pthe was brought forward, which was approved by J Recreation Clubs and the Park artment shall mplementycostmsavings whereby the Clubs and the Dep and cost sharing alterna~hee su ° ested user fees ($30,650 lin hthe been generated through gg 1990-91 budget). The Board asked staff to review participation by youth in the other programs and to determine the fiscestsmthat therfiveedollar for these program offerings. Staff sugg included in per participant fee for youth classes or activities, the Leisure Arts, Community Education, Adult Athletics, and Ououthr Adventure programs, b nd oind ar c t costhcomponents of theseeclasses and that the direct a be continued as origi Would pbe $6 515. The fiscal impact base on 1989_90 participation 1 ~{- / BACKGROUND: During the 1989-90 fiscal year, youth participated in the levels: programs of the Recreation Department at the following Pp,RTICIPANT5 PROGRAMS YOUTH/TOTAL YOUTH/TOTAL PROGRAM DIVISION 285/1,311 34/126 LEISURE ARTS 637/1,195 47/79 COMMUNITY EDUCATION 381 867 39 86 OUTDOOR ADVENTURE 1,303/3,373 120/291 TOTAL In reviewing the fees under the new fee structure, staff was sensitive to the class size, number of hours participants were and the levels of participation in the involved in the program, ualit within each program past as it attempted to keep the q Y offering and keep the fees affird~heecostpofvthesinstructor and recovered the direct cost (usual y the basic training materials). The new proposal alserreartecipant of the indirect on f ao few ofdthenc asses are shown below to point fee. A compares out the impact to the participant. PREVIOUS P$0-.- 56 CLASS/PROGRAM $ 40 Pottery (Adult) 22 34 Ceramics (Adult) 22 29 Youth Ballet 25 25 Youth Studio Art 11 15 T-Shirt Workshop g(per/month) 48(3 months) Beginner Baton 15 16 Jewelry Making (Adult) 15 25 Kayak 14 and u 15 25 Climbing ( P) * For classes exclusively for would reduce the propos d fee by $5n fee could be eliminated, which During the development of this fee policy, staff has reviewed each of the program areas of the Recreation DWgichmcons der the suggested fees which are fair to the th mm youth, and the special ability to pay of the elderly, the Board, population group (Therapeutic programs). As directed by no participant will be denied access due to anrovidelat balanced, and programs will be designed and offered to p leisure diversion to each segment of our community. It should be noted that the County spends approximately $2 million annually to provide parks and general recreational opportunities to our residents for thesextax ddollars,G the current Revenue sources. In addition 2 H- and proposed fees help to offset the coo tuniti~es ewhichn may be specialized programs and organized opp enjoyed by interested persons. The imposition of then ested by the related to the reduction i 9 real e ~ , n e f 1990 es Bugg Board of Supervisors durin the Sp g FISCAL IMPACT: 1990 report to the Board of As indicated on the July 24, Supervisors, staff suggests that $6,500 be reduced from the equipment account in the Youth Atcost 1 center of t the aParks4~and from the Grounds Maintenance Recreation budget, and the de°a balanced budget asc aeresultf ofsthe reduced by $30,650 to pro outh athletics, whereby the revised language dealing with y Recreation Clubs and Recreation Department will seek cost rovosed and/or cost sharing alternatives to ofof th athleticsnalStaff feels five dollar per participant fee for y that the $6,515 savings by eliminating the five dollar per ro ram offerings, exclusively for participant fee for class or p g youth in the Leisure Arts, Co ann be ffset lby~ the loveralltfees and Outdoor Adventure areas collected. ALTERNATIVES: Alternative #1 Adopt the attached ordinance, as amended, to allow the Recreation Clubs in the Youth Athletics program and talternativesn Department to implement cost sa ar g cinant feesoriginally proposed. in lieu of the five dollar per p P $30,650 should be reduced from the Recreation Department budget as indicated above. Also, allow the five dollar per or programs offered exclusively for Community Education, Adult Athletics, eliminated. All other provisions of originally proposed. Alternative #2 participant fee for classes youth in the Leisure Arts, or Outdoor Adventure to be the ordinance to remain as Adopt the ordinance as originally proposed. Alternative #3 Adopt the ordinance as originally proposed with the exception of the modification of the yout c a ant tfees for oexclusi ely eyouth of the five dollar per parts p programs in the Leisure Arts ns omm d ~o appropr ate $301650t fromlthe and Outdoor Adventure sectio , 3 unappropriated balance, so that no reduction in service previously performed for the youth athletics required. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Alternative #1 ordinance and amending the budget by Fiscal Impact section of this report. effect immediately. f -~- / the level of area would be of adopting the revised $ TheSordinance should take Appr/o` ed by, Respectfully submitted, `J ~wr.~! GJ-t~-7 rte, 1z, ~`~'~~°".~-~ `-Q Elmer C . Hodge John M. Chamb iss, Jr. County Administrator Assistant Administrator _ ------- ------------- VOTE ------------------ ACTION No Yes pis Approved ( ) Motion by: Eddy Denied ( ) Johnson Received ( ) McGraw Referred ( ) Nickens To ( ) Robers 4 ~- AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THROANOKE COUNTYEADMINISTRATIONC NTER~NTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE TUESDAY, AUGUST 14, 1990 ONCREASING FUTCERTAIN GFEESH FOR ISERVICES FOR I PARKS AND RECREATION ACTIVITIES WHEREAS, on September 20, 1989, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, selected David M. Griffith and Associates, Ltd. to conduct a detailed cost/revenue study focusing upon an analysis of user fee services; and WHEREAS, the purpose of said user fee study was to calculate the full costs of providing specific services, compare costs with the revenues received for these services, and recommend fee levels to recover the full costs of services when such fees are practical; and WHEREAS, the Board has found that it is both equitable and efficient to ensure that those individuals who benefit from certain governmental services bear the cost thereof while eliminating unintentional general service cost subsidies; and WHEREAS, as a result of said study the Board determined that it was in the public interest to increase certain user fees, as modified by staff recommendations, budget work sessions, and citizen comments in order to recover a portion of the direct and indirect costs of providing certain services as provided herein; and WHEREAS, the first reading on this ordinance was held on May 22, 1990, and the second reading on this ordinance was held on July 24, 1990. 1 /7 ' BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the Director of the Roanoke County Department of Parks and Recreation is hereby authorized to establish fees for parks and recreation services and activities, subject to the approval of the County Administrator, and subject to the following standards: a) Definitions: Indirect costs include the general fund appropriation for each of the cost centers associated with the recreation area based on the '~^~o previous fiscal year budget, plus the allocation of the central administrative costs for the Department of Parks and Recreation, and in the case of athletics, the share of the ballfield maintenance, which is provided by the Parks Division of the Department. Direct costs relate to the specific costs of instructors and associated supplies, which the County is currently recovering in the fees charged to participants. The registration fee is proposed to be established at $5 per participant, per activity and the membership fee is proposed to be $10 annually for senior citizens, in lieu of a registration fee. The guidelines, which were approved by the Parks & Recreation Advisory Commission, are as follows: b) For activities included under community education: leisure arts, outdoor adventure and adult athletics, the fee should be based upon a $5 registration fee, per participant, plus 25$ of 2 N-/ the indirect cost, plus 100 of the direct cost. In any of the shall be no S5 per participant fee. L r ~ ~ ~~= a c) For youth athletics, _ ~-' ~~ in lieu of a S5 rectistration . ,~ _ _ ,.mow ~~.w~ Gt • -:~~~m clubs and Department rre'r~c-i~~nF3-€Ar- ~+~• of Parks and Recreation shall im lement cost savin s and cost sharin alternatives to offset the fees which would have been -_-- -_,. __ Lti... ,oon_a~ Bud et . d) For special events, the budget should plan to recover 40~ of the indirect cost and 100$ of the direct cost. e) For therapeutics, there shall be a recovery of 20$ of the direct cost. f) For senior citizens, there shall be a $10 membership fee, plus 100 of direct cost associated with the program. 2. That the Director shall develop guidelines for the waiver or reduction of fees based upon demonstrable hardship and inability to pay. 3. That the effective date of this ordinance and for the imposition of the fees and charges authorized herein shall be August 1, 1990. 3 . ~ ~ ~~ ~, AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THROANOKE COUNTYEADMINISTRATION CENTER~NTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE TUESDAY, AUGUST 14, 1990 ORDINANING OFUTCERTAIN GFEESH FOR SERVICES FOR INCREAS PARKS AND RECREATION ACTIVITIES WHEREAS, on September 20, 1989, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, selected David M. Griffith and Associates, Ltd. to conduct a detailed cost/revenue study focusing upon an analysis of user fee services; and WHEREAS, the purpose of said user fee study was to calculate the full costs of providing specific services, compare casts with the revenues received for these services, and recommend fee levels to recover the full costs of services when such fees are practical; and WHEREAS, the Board has found that it is both equitable and efficient to ensure that those individuals who benefit from certain governmental services bear an appropriate portion of the cost thereof while reducing general service cost subsidies; and WHEREAS, as a result of said study the Board determined that it was in the public interest to increase certain user fees, as modified by staff recommendations, budget work sessions, and citizen comments in order to recover a portion of the direct and indirect costs of providing certain services as provided herein; and WHEREAS, the first reading on this ordinance was held on May 22, 1990, and the second reading on this ordinance was held on August 14, 1990. 1 BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1, That the Director of the Roanoke County Department of Parks and Recreation is hereby authorized to establish fees for parks and recreation services and activities, subject to the approval of the County Administrator, and subject to the following standards: a) Definitions: Indirect costs include the general fund appropriation for each of the cost centers associated with the recreation area based on the previous fiscal year budget, plus the allocation of the central administrative costs for the Department of Parks and Recreation, and in the case of athletics, the share of the ballfield maintenance, which is provided by the Parks Division of the Department. Direct costs relate to the specific costs of instructors and associated supplies. The registration fee is proposed to be established at $5 per participant, per activity and the membership fee is proposed to be $10 annually for senior citizens, in lieu of a registration fee. b) Standards• The standards, which were approved by the Parks & Recreation Advisory Commission, are as follows: 1) For activities included under community education• leisure arts, outdoor adventure and adult athletics, the fee shall be based upon a $5 registration fee, per participant, 2 plus 25~ of the indirect cost, plus 100 of the direct cost. In any of the programs offered by these divisions primarily for youth under 18 years of age, there shall be no $5 per participant fee. 2) For youth athletics, in lieu of a $5 registration fee per participant, the participating recreation clubs and Department of Parks and Recreation may implement cost savings and cost sharing alternatives to offset the revenue which would have been generated through the suggested user fees. 3) For special events, the budget shall recover 40~ of the indirect cost and 100 of the direct cost. 4) For therapeutics, there shall be a recovery of 20~ of the direct cost. 5) For senior citizens, there shall be a $10 membership fee, plus 100 of direct cost associated with the program. 2. That the Director shall develop guidelines for the waiver or reduction of fees based upon demonstrable hardship and inability to pay and shall implement related policies. 3. That the effective date of this ordinance and for the imposition of the fees and charges authorized herein shall be ~~ August ~ 1990. 3 W 11111111111111111 = APPEARANCE REQUEST -_ AGENDA ITEM NO. ~~ ~; - ~ ,r _ suBJECT ~ .~~ - ''' - ,, = I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supex~isors to recognize me during the public hearin on the above matter - so that I ma comment.WHEN CALLS TO THE PODI , - I WILL GI E MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR T - RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINE = LISTED BELOW. __ • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, = and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Boazd to __ do otherwise. _ • Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Ques- bons of clarification may be entertained by the Chauman. _ • All comments must be directed to the Boazd. Debate between a recognized = speaker and audience members is not allowed. • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all tunes. • Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. • INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FQR AN ORGANIZED '- GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION _ FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. - PLEASE PRINT L GIBLY AND GIVE TO DEPUTY CLERK __ NAME r ~~~ ~~: ~'~' ~/ =_ = ADDRESS ~ ~ ~'>"~'~C'k~'~~ -~' ~-~ - - -_ - / / PHONE ~r~`~ " `: ~ ~/ `7 (~ 1 ~~ ~ /~~.~ ~` )rf/ ~ - mill~llllllllllllillllllllllllllllllilllllllllllllllllllilllllillllllllllill~i~l~~~~~l~lliilillilillllilllllllllllilllllll IIIIIIIIIIiIII.IIIIIIIIIIililllillllllllllllllililllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll ~jJllllllllillllllllllllll N ^ ~ = ARAN CE REQUEST = APPE _ AGENDA ITEM NO. =_ SUBJECT h~~rla-n~-~ i c~`.~~i1c~ Lr `v1Cr~C_5~v~c Lt -~i' e cc~ ~~', ~ :, ~e ~o,~- I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to _ reco nize me during the public hearing on the above matter WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIU , _ so that I ma comment. I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FORTH _ RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELIN LISTED BELOW. • ker will be iven between three to five minutes to comment _ Each spea g c whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizensosnea o f he Board toes and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the maj ty do otherwise. • S Bakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Ques- = tppons of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. = Debate between a recognized • All comments must be directed to the Board. speaker and audience members is not allowed. -_ 'Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. • rs are re nested to leave any written statements and/or comments _ Speake q __ with the clerk. ___ • INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION "~ FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. _ _ PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO DEPUTY CLE __ '" NAME t~C~ M~ ~-~ = ADDRESS ~ ~ru `~~ ~`~ _ PHONE "~'~'~ - L `~ ~ 1 _ IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII I I I I IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIilillllllllllllllllllllllillllllllllll milllillllli 111111.IIIIIIIlIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIJ ~JIIIIIIIIilllllillllllllliillllll _ ,y ~ . _ . - ARAN CE RE QUE S ' - APPE ' ~^~ - AGENDA ITEM NO. - __ SUBJECT c c I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to - reco nine me during the public hearing on the above matter - WHEN CALLED TO THE PODI , - so that I ma comment. - I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR T - RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELIN = LISTED BELOW. • ker will be iven between three to five minutes to comment - Each spec g .= whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens snea o f he Board toed '-' and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the ma~o ty __ do otherwise. • Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Ques- -_ bons of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. Debate between a recognized • All comments must be directed to the Board. = speaker and audience members is not allowed. - • _ th s Bakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. - Bo p • s are re uested to leave any written statements and/or comments - Speaker q __ with the clerk. -__ • INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION -' FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT = THEM. - PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO DEPUTY CLER - .._- '' ,i ,' b ~ G. ~~. '- NAME -~ e r - ~, ADDRESS ~ Z ~ S ~`~ ~' ~ r `~ ~~ ` `S ~ - c - 3 - PHONE ~l ~ ~ - ~ Illilllllllllliillllllllll l l l llllllllllllllilillllllilllliilllilllllllllllllllllllllllllllillllllllllllll mllillllillillll ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER ~ - ! AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: August 14, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: Request for Attendance at National Institute of Justice Program COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION Supervisor Nickens has requested that a member of the Board of Supervisors attend the National Institute of Justice Program from August 20 through August 23, 1990 in Portland Maine. The workshop will provide information and opportunities available to local governments who seek to engage incarcerated persons in the delivery of governmental services such as building maintenance, painting, parks and recreation. Information will be available at the workshop on additional resources to implement programs with inmates such as drug rehabilitation programs. The cost of the program will be funfled by the National Institute of Justice. Staff has contacted Sheriff Kavanaugh who advised this includes travel, room and tuition. The Sheriff has received approval for four individuals from Roanoke County to attend without cost. One must be an elected official and one must be the head of corrections. Sheriff Kavanaugh plans to attend with two of his staff. Supervisor Nickens has suggested that one of the supervisors may wish to attend as the elected official. Otherwise, he recommends that Assistant County Administrator John Chambliss attend on behalf of the Board. FISCAL IMPACT None. The entire cost of the program, including room, tuition and travel expenses will be covered by the National Institute of Justice Program. .. ~- / RECOMMENDATION Supervisor Nickens recommends that the Board support this program and authorize a member of the Boare recommends that Assi tant•John no board member wishes to attend, h Chambliss attend on the Board' behalf. ~~ Elmer C. Ho ge County Administrator ----------------- -------- __ ---- --------------------- VOTE --- ACTION No Yes Abs Approved ( ) Motion by: Eddy Denied ( ) Johnson Received ( ) McGraw Referred ( ) Nickens To ( ) - Robers A-81490-7 ACTION NUMBER ITEM NUMBER ~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OFHEHROANOKE COUNTYEADMINISTRATION CENTER COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT T MEETING DATE: August 14, 1990 SUBJECT: Appointments to Committees, Commissions and Boards COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: 1 Board of Zoning Appeals Five-year term of M. E. Maxey, Vinton Magisterial District expired June 30, 1990. 2. Buildin Code Board of Ad'ustments and A eals Four year terms of John Brownlee, Alternate, expired July 25, 1990 This Board is mandated by State Code, but alternates are not required. James T. Nininger, Chief Building Official, has advised that in his opinion only one, alternate member is necessary at this time. Larry Lester was appointed as an alternate on July 10, the0otheraalternaterposition untilnsuchr recommends abolishing time as the Board becomeadvisesathatehe ispnotlinterestedsin ho nominated Mr. Brownlee, serving another term. 3, Communit Corrections Resources Board One-year term of Edmund J. Kielty, Alternate. His term expired August 13, 1988. Alternates are not regResources BoardBmade~thetinformal~decision Community Corrections to request alternate members. Dr. Bernard therClerk torthetBoard member of the Board, has been contacted by lace and he advises that Mr~ea1eointmentaofeMredKieltynto fulfillpthe and he recommends the pp 1989-1990 term and to another one-year term which will expire on August 13, 1991. Mr. Kielty is willing to serve. t ,~~ - C° 4. Grievance Panel Two-year terms of Thomas T. Palmer and R. Vincent Reynolds, Alternate will expire September 10, 1990. 5 Industrial Development Authority Four-year terms of J. expire September 26, Carson Quarles and Daniel A. Zahn, will 1990. 6. Landfill Citizens Advisor Committee Carl L. Wright, represenaaanotherorepresentativelshouldlbeerial District has resigned an appointed. SUBMITTED BY: y~~~ T~ _ Mary H. Allen Clerk to the Board ' APPROVED BY: ~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator • ACTION Harry C. Nickens VOTE No YX s Abs Approved (x) Motion by to abolish one alternate positioiLddy Denied ( ) on Building Code Board of Johnson x x Received ( ) Adjustments and Appeals McGraw x Referred ( ) Nickens To ( ) Robers x cc: File ustments and Appeals Building Code Board of Adj Skip Nininger, Development & Inspections I- ~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HON TUESDAY R AU UST C 4~T1990MINISTRATION CENTER RESOLUTION 81490-8 APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM K - CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. that the certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for August 14, 1990 designated as Item K - Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 11, inclusive, as follows: 1, Approval of Minutes - June 26, 1990, July 10, 1990, July 24, 1990. 2. Acknowledgement from the Virginia Department of Transportation of the acceptance and •sectionse of Countrywood Drive (Route 1999) Route 612 into the Secondary System. 3. Acceptance of water and sanitary sewer facilities serving Kingston Court, Section 2. 4. Resolution requesting changes in the Secondary System due to relocation and reconstruction of Old Mill Road. 5. Acceptance of water and sanitary sewer facilities serving "The Park" at Valleypointe Phase II, Building C. 6. Donation of water line easements across Lots 10 and 11, Section 8, La Bellevue. 7. Donation of drainage easement from Hugh H. Wells and Margaret H. Wells - Chaparral Drive Project. 8. Donation of drainage easements in connection with the Givens Avenue Drainage Project and the Alleghany Drive Project. 9. Donation of drainage easement through Lots 10, 11, 13, Block 2, North Hills Subdivision - Greenway Drive. 10. Donation of sanitary sewer and drainage easements in connection with the Grandin Road Extension Project. 11. Donation of a drainage easement from Lawrence R. Morgan and Michele Maureen Morgan - Wing Commander Drive Project. 2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this resolution. On motion of Supervisor Nickens, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors 8/15/90 CC: File Phillip Henry, Director of Engineering Clifford Craig, Utility Director Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney ~ -- l June 26, 1990 Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Roanoke County Administration Center 3738 Brambleton Avenue, SW Roanoke, Virginia 24018 June 26, 1990 The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, met this day at the Roanoke County Administration Center, this being the fourth Tuesday, and the second regularly scheduled meeting of the month of June, 1990. ZN RE: CALL TO ORDER Chairman Robers called the meeting to order at 3:05 p.m. The roll call was taken. MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Richard Robers, Vice Chairman Steven A. McGraw, Supervisors Lee B. Eddy, Bob L. - Johnson MEMBERS ABSENT: Supervisor Harry C. Nickens STAFF PRESENT: Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator; John M. Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator for Human Services; John R. Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator of Community Services and Development; Don M. Myers, Assistant County Administrator for Management 45 452 June 26, 1990 None ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens 2. Recognition of Parks and Recreation Therapeutics Pro ram for bein named a finalist - National Gold Medal Award for Excellence. Director of Parks and Recreation Steve Carpenter explained the program. Betsy Dennis, Therapeutic Recreation Supervisor and Acting Assistant Recreation Director Debbie Pitts were recognized for their contributions. A slide presentation of the program that will be a part of the submission package was presented. 3. Reco nition of Alfred Anderson Treasurer for bein certified as a Professional Government Treasurer Chairman Robers presented to Mr. Anderson a certificate recognizing him as a Professional Government Treasurer. IN RE: NEW BIISINESS la. Report on Consolidation Issues Mr. Hodge announced that the board members had requested clarification of certain facts which were released by the City of Salem at recent public meetings concerning consolidation. He presented a written memorandum outlining the current tax rates and bonded debt and responses to other issues which had been discussed at the public meetings. In response to a question 'from Supervisor Robers regarding additional members to Salem City council if the Glenvar June 26, 1990 454 e presented the plan and reported that the Phase I study will cost $10,000 which will include all expenses. He recommended approval of the peer review study and a $10,000 appropriation from the unappropriated balance to fund the study. In response to a question from Supervisor Eddy, Mr. Hodge advised that the study will include analyzing the organizational structure. Supervisor Eddy moved to approve the staff recommendation and appropriation. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: , AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Robers NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens 2. Adoption of Resolution amendinc Section 200 of The Desi n and Construction Standards Manual. R-62690-2 Director of Development and Inspections Arnold Covey reported that on February 14, 1990 the Board of Supervisors adopted the Design and Construction Standards Manual. On January 1, 1990 the Virginia Department of Transportation adopted new subdivision street standards which should be included in the previously approved standards manual. Other amendments clear up discrepancies that have been brought forward by staff and local engineers. Following discussion, Supervisor Johnson moved to 456 June 26, 1990 Cons tion Standards Manual" to assist the public in the clarification and interpretation of rules, regulations, and policies applicable to land development in Roanoke County, and in particular, the areas of water, sewer, street and parking; and WHEREAS, by Resolution 21489-9 the Board of Supervisors adopted the second component of the "Design and Construction Manual" entitled "Street and Parking Design Standards and Specifications." NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, does hereby amend the second component of the "Design and Construction Standards Manual," which is entitled "Street and Parking Design Standards and Specifications," as set out in Attachment "A" to this resolution. IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED the effective date of these amendments shall be effective immediately. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Robers NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens 3. ~propriation of funds for leachate removal at Dixie Caverns landfill. A-62690-3 There was no discussion on this item. June 26, 1990 458 upervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Robers NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens 6. Adoation of resolution concerning acquisition of and immediate right-of-entry to a sanitarv sewer line easement aloha the West Fork of Carvin Creek also known as Vallemointe phase II Sanitary Sewer Project.(PUBLIC HEARING HELD 6/10/90) (This item was heard during the evening session) R-62690-7 Mr. Hodge advised that the staff had met with the property owners. They attempted to settle and will continue to negotiate, but wish to go forward with right-of-entry. The public hearing had previously been held on June 10, 1990. Supervisor Johnson moved to adopt the resolution. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Robers NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens RESOLUTION 62690-7 PURSUANT TO § 15.1-238 (e) OF THE 1950 CODE OF VIRGINIA, AS AMENDED, SETTING FORTH THE INTENT OF ROANORE COUNTY TO ENTER UPON CERTAIN PROPERTIES AND TO TARE CERTAIN RIGHTS-OF-WAY IN CONNECTION WITH THE VALLEYPOZNTE PHASE II PROJECT BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 460 June 26, 1990 That it is the intent of Roanoke County to enter and take the easement hereinabove described for the Valleypointe Phase II Sanitary Sewer Project. 4. That, pursuant to due notice as provided for by statute, a public hearing was held on June 12, 1990, on the adoption of a Resolution pursuant to §15.1-238(e) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, concerning acquisition of and immediate right-of-entry to said sanitary sewer line easement by Roanoke County. 5. That the fair market value of the aforesaid interest to be acquired is $2579, such compensation having been, and hereby is, offered the property owners. 6. That it is immediately necessary for the County to enter upon and take such property and commence said sanitary sewer construction in order to complete Phase II of the Valleypointe Project and to thereafter institute and conduct appropriate condemnation proceedings as to said sanitary sewer easement; and 7. That pursuant to the provisions of § 15.1-238(e) of the Code of Virginia (1950), as amended, and pursuant to notice and public hearing as made and provided therein, the Board does hereby invoke all and singular the rights and privileges and provisions of said § 15.1-238(e) as to the vesting of powers in the County pursuant to § 33.1-119 through § 33.1-129 of the Code of Virginia (1950), as amended, all as made and provided by law. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the ordinance, June 26, 1990 462 y restore the channel to the original condition or agree to pay $4,700 and enter into an agreement to maintain the channel and indemnify the Wrights against action brought by persons injured in or near the channel. In response to a question from Supervisor Nickens, Mr. Grimes advised that the Wrights moved to the property in June 1989. Mr. Mahoney recommended denial of the claim and allow it to go forward to Circuit Court. Supervisor McGraw pointed out that the remarks regarding the staff were the Wrights' opinion and not fact. Supervisor Eddy pointed out that the homeowners were given an option of leaving the easement as it was or having it improved and the homeowners chose to have it improved. Mr. Grimes responded that the Wrights did not approve this action, but the former owners may have. Supervisor Robers moved to deny the claim. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Robers NAYS: None _~.. ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens 9. ~ ropriation to the 1990-91 Regional Education Fund. A-62690-5 There was no discussion. Supervisor Johnson moved to approve the appropriation. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: 464 June 26, 1990 wi a inistrative approval in future years if there are no complaints. A business license is required. The Planning Commission recommended approval with certain conditions. Supervisor McGraw advised that one citizen had contacted him and he requested a letter which he did not receive. The petitioner was present and advised she had talked with the citizen who is now agreeable to the request. Supervisor McGraw moved to approve the Special Exception Permit with conditions for a one year time period with ongoing staff review The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Robers NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens CONDITIONS 1. Hours of operation should be limited to 8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. 2. Petitioner shall install proper plumbing and electrical equipment and fixtures to Chief Building Official's satisfaction prior to staff's approval of business license. 3. No more than two (2) customers' cars shall be allowed at any one time. 4. No more than two (2) customers shall be allowed at one time. IN RE: PIIBLIC HEARINGS AND SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 466 June 26, 1990 ees to be taxed as costs in each criminal or traffic case in the district and circuit courts of the County for the construction, renovation or maintenance of the courthouse, jail or court- related facilities, and further provided the expiration of this authority on July 1, 1991; and WHEREAS, the first reading on this ordinance was held on June 12, 1990; and the second reading and public hearing was held on June 26, 1990. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That pursuant to the authority found in Section 14.1-133.2 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, (1990 Acts of Assembly, Chapter 543), there is hereby assessed a fee to be taxed as the costs in each criminal and traffic case in the district and circuit courts serving Roanoke County the sum of TWO DOLLARS ( $ 2.0 0) . The fees assessed. by this ordinance shall be expended for the purposes as provided in said statute, specifically, for the construction, renovation and maintenance of the courthouse or jail and court-related facilities and to defray increases in the cost of heating, cooling, electricity, and ordinary maintenance. This assessment shall be in addition to other fees and costs prescribed by law. 2. That this assessment shall be collected by the clerk of the court in which the action is filed, and remitted to the Treasurer of Roanoke County and held by him subject to June 26, 1990 468 in the southwest corner of the site. Permission from Apco would be necessary to use the easement for access to the site which the petitioner intends to use. There ark no conditions to the land but one condition to the petitioner regulating the size of the structure. Staff recommends not accepting the condition. The Planning Commission recommended approval. Supervisor Eddy expressed concern about the future use of the land other than the equipment storage yard. Without conditions it could be used for any M-2 use. There is also no proffer of conditions for inside storage of equipment. T. L. Plunkett, representing the petitioner, advised that there is no application for subdivision of the land. Mr. Harrington advised that further subdivision would not come before the Board. . Supervisor McGraw also expressed concern about the future use of the remaining land and asked the County Attorney if the Board could approve only a portion of the property. Mr. Mahoney responded that the Board could approve a lesser amount of the property, but no more than the legal ad called for. Several Board members advised that they could not support the rezoning without more information on what the land would be used for. Supervisor Johnson suggested continuing the request to a later date to allow the board to receive more information and additional conditions. Mr. Plunkett responded that the contract to purchase the land expires July 1 and Mr. Martin was not interested in only a partial rezoning because he June 26, 1990 410 supporting this request because of the staff report. Bruce Mayer, attorney for the petitioner, advised that there was a 200 foot wide transmission line through the property. He explained that the convenience store replaces an old country store that had existed for 40 years. The new gas tanks will have all new equipment including monitors. The existing entrance will be blocked and two new entrances will be added. Supervisor McGraw moved to continue the request to July 10, 1990. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, }Tohnson, Robers NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens IN RE: 690-3 PETITION OF FRANK MARTIN TO REZONE 3.5 ACRES FROM M-1 TO M-2 (TABLED EARLIER IN EVENING SESSION) Mr. Plunkett announced they had met with the planning staff and advised they were willing to reduce the portion of the property to be rezoned to M-2. He presented a map showing five lots and advised that they would build on Lot 4. Sandy Freeman, owner and administrative director of a day care center across the street from the property spoke. She was not opposed but wanted to know more specifically what would be built because of the proximity to the children at the day care center. Supervisor McGraw moved to remove this item from the June 26, 1990 472 = e une , 1990; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on June 5, 1990; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing 3.5 acre, as described herein, and located on Starkey Road (Route 604) 350 feet. north of Crescent Boulevard, (Tax Map Number 87.15-2-8) in the Cave Spring Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of M- 1, Light Industrial District, to the zoning classification of M- 2, General Industrial District. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of Frank W. Martin. 3. That the owner of the subject real estate is Donald H. Pollard. 4. That said real estate is more fully described 5. That the effective date of this ordinance shall be June 26, 1990. On motion of Supervisor Robers to approve rezoning portion as defined in map contingent upon proper designation June 26, 1990 474 IN RE: FIRST READING OF ORDINANCF?B 1. Ordinance requesting vacation of an existing 20 foot waterline easement located on Lots 9 and 10, Block 1, Section 8, LaBellwe Subdivision, Hollins Magisterial District. Director of Development and Inspections Arnold Covey reported that the petitioner, Mr. Paul Hatam, is requesting vacation of an existing 20 foot waterline easement because the waterline was not placed within the easement and is presently located in the common line of lots 10 and 11. Mr. Hatam and Mr. Robert Bryant, owners of lots 10 and 11 have agreed to grant a 20 foot waterline easement where the ut..ility service is located. Supervisor Johnson moved to approve first reading of the ordinance. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Robers NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens 2. Ordinance amending and readoyting Sectioa 4-53 of Article III, Shooting Matches of Chapter 4. Amusements: Section 2 17 of Chapter 2, Administration: Section _11-28 of Article II. Parlor Permit• of Cha ter li Massa a Parlors• Section 12-12 and 12-13 of Article I. In General Article ID. Accidents and Section 476 June 26, 1990 department for the County of Roanoke effective July 1, 1990, pursuant to the authorization of § 15.1-131.6:1 of the Code of Virginia; and WHEREAS, it is the intention of the Board to transfer all law enforcement related functions from the Sheriff to the Chief of Police of Roanoke County; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on June 26, 1990. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That Sec. 4-53 of Article III. SHOOTING MATCHES, of Chapter 4, AMUSEMENTS, of the Roanoke County Code be amended and readopted to read and provide as follows: Sec. 4-53. Chief of Police's "`-- "`~ report as prerequisite to issuance. A written investigative report from the Chief of Police ~_, with specific recommendations, shall be submitted before the board of supervisors shall issue any special use permit for any shooting match. 2. That Sec. 2-17 of the Roanoke County Code be amended and readopted, as follows: sec. 2-17. Dissemination of criminal history record information of applicants for public employment. permit or license. a. Criminal history record information of an applicant for public employment, permit or license may be disseminated within five (51 work days to agencies of local government 478 ' June 26, 1990 3. That Sec. 11-28 of Article II. parlor Permit of Chapter 11, Messacle Parlors, of the Roanoke County Code be amended and readopted to read and provide as follows: Sec. 11-28. Referral of application to certain officers. The director shall refer e~3ch application for a permit under this article to the administrative officers of the county charged with the enforcement of the building and fire prevention codes and to the Chief of Police ~= for investigation. 4. That Sec. 12-12 and 12-13 of Article I. In General, of Chapter 12, Motor Vehicles and Traffic, be amended and readopted as follows: Sec. 12-12. Operation of unregistered or unlicensed motorcycles on private property. It shall be unlawful for any person to operate any motorcycle which is not registered and licensed, as required by Title 46.2 ~-1 of the Code of Virginia, on the driveways or premises of a church, school, recreational facility or business property open to the public, unless authorized by the owner of such property or his agent. The owner of any property desiring enforcement of the provisions of this section on his property ~~ in writing of his shall notify the Chief of Police ~, desire to be covered by the provisions of this section and such owner shall post notices on his property adequate to inform the public that operation of such vehicles upon such property is unlawful. Sec. 12-13. Removal and disposition of certain unattended vehicles. June 26, 1990 ~ 8 0 lot of the authorized towing service and after due notice of sale, dispose of the same at public sale; provided, that if the value of such motor vehicle, trailer or semitrailer is determined by three (3) disinterested dealers or garagemen to be less than one hundred fifty dollars ($150.00), it may be disposed of by private sale or junked. (f) The Chief of Police c~ shall forward the proceeds of any sale made pursuant to this section to the county treasurer. The treasurer shall pay from such proceeds the cost of removal, storage, investigation as to ownership and liens and notice of sale, and the balance of such funds shall be held by him for the owner of the motor vehicle, trailer or semitrailer and paid to such owner, upon satisfactory proof of ownership. If no claim has been made by the owner for the proceeds of such sale, the remaining funds may be deposited to the general fund or any special fund of the county. Any such owner shall be entitled to apply to the county within three (3) years from the date of such sale, and if timely application is made therefor, the county shall pay the same to the owner, without interest or other charges. No claim shall be made nor shall any suit, action or proceeding be instituted for recovery of such funds after three (3) years from the date of such sale. 5. That Article IV. Accidents, of Chapter 12, Motor Vehicles and Traffic, amended and readopted as follows: Article IV. Accidents Sec. 12-92. Immediate notice of certain accidents. June 26, 1990 482 scene of the accident or thereafter and elsewhere, by interviewing participants or witnesses shall, within twenty-four (24) hours after completing the investigation, forward a written report of the accident to the Roanoke County Police Department ~, Such report shall include the name of the insurance carrier or the insurance agent of the automobile liability policy of each vehicle involved in such accident. Sec. 12-96. Report by garage or impair shop. The person in charge of any garage or repair shop to which is brought any motor vehicle that shows evidence of having been involved in a serious motor vehicle accident or with evidence of blood stains shall report to the Roanoke County Police Department-~~r , within twenty-four (24) hours after the motor vehicle is received, giving the engine number, registration number and the name and address of the owner or operator of the vehicle, if known. Reports require by this section shall be made upon forms furnished by the Superintendent of State Police. Sec. 12-97. Reports to be without•prejudice; confidentiality of reports. All accident reports made by persons involved in accidents or by garages or repair shops shall be without prejudice to the individual so reporting and shall be for the confidential use of the county, the state Department ~~-'' of Motor Vehicles or other state agencies having use for the reports for accident prevention purposes, except that the Roanoke County 484 June 26, 1990 persons, the witnesses and one investigating officer. Sec 12-100. Availability of reports to certain persons. L. ~,.~: tF ~ .. The Roanoke County Police Department ~___-_-~ - ~e~e~ shall make any report of an accident made pursuant to Sections 12-93 through 12-95 available for inspection by any person involved or injured in the accident or his attorney or any authorized representative of any insurance carrier reasonably anticipating exposure to civil liability as a consequence of the accident. Such person, attorney or authorized representative shall be furnished a copy of such report, upon written request L. ...~: FF Is therefor and payment to the Police Department of the fee established pursuant to Sec. 16-12. 6. That Secs. 12-121 and 12-125 of Article V. Ino erative Motor Vehicles Trailers and Semitrailers, of Chapter 12, Motor Vehicles and Traffic of the Roanoke County Code be amended and readopted to read and provide as follows: Sec. 12-121. Administration and Enforcement. The Chief of Police~~and Zoning Administrator, through their agents or employees, shall be jointly responsible for the administration and enforcement of this Article. Sec. 12-125. Removal of inoperative motor vehicles, etc. (1) The owner of the property on which there is an inoperative motor vehicle, trailer, or semitrailer that is not fully enclosed or completely shielded shall remove the vehicle or comply with the screening or enclosure requirement of this Article within fifteen June 26, ].,990 ARTICLE II. PERMIT Sec. 14-22. Application A person seeking the issuance of a parade permit shall 48fi ~----- = F ~ on forms file an application with the Chief of Police ~_ {~ ~.~ . C F provided by the Chief of Police ~n~• Such application shal be filed not less than fifteen (15) days before the date on which it is proposed to conduct the parade. The application shall be signed by the applicant and notarized and shall contain the following information: (1) The name, address and telephone number of the person seeking to conduct the parade. (2) If the parade is proposed to be conducted for, on behalf of or by an organization, the name, address and telephone number of the headquarters of the organization and of the authorized and responsible heads of such organization. (3) The name, address and telephone number of the person who will be the parade chairman and who will be responsible for its conduct. (4) The date when the parade is to be conducted. (5) The route to be traveled, the starting point and the termination point'. (6) The approximate number of persons who, and animals and vehicles which, will constitute the parade and the type of animals and a description of the vehicles. 4~ ~ June 26, 1990 conducted on behalf of a nonprofit or charitable organization. Sec. 14-24. Issuance or denial (a) The Chief of Police~~ shall act upon an application for a parade permit, within seven (7) days after the filing thereof, by either issuing or denying the permit. If he denies the permit, the Chief of Police 33e shall mail to the applicant, by certified mail, or have served upon the applicant, within seven (7) days after the date upon which the application was filed, a notice of his action stating the reasons for the denial of the permit. Any person aggrieved shall have the right to appeal such denial or aranting of a parade permit to the circuit court of the county. The appeal shall be taken within eight (8) days after receipt of the notice of denial or aranting of such permit. (b) The Chief of Police~~ shall issue a parade permit when, from a consideration of the application and from such other information as may otherwise be obtained, he finds that: (1) The conduct of the parade will not substantially interrupt the safe and orderly movement of other traffic contiguous to its route. (2) The conduct of the parade will not require the diversion of so great a number of law-enforcement officers of the county, to properly police the line of movement and the areas contiguous thereto, 49 0 June 26, 1990 - -- This provision shall not prohibit signs identifying organizations or sponsors furnishing or sponsoring floats or transportation for the parade. (c) The Chief of Police-~~, in denying an application for a parade permit, any authorize the conduct of the parade on a date, at a time or over a route different from that named by the applicant. An applicant desiring to accept an alternative permit shall, within two (2) days after notice of the action of the Chief of Police~~, file a written notice of acceptance with the Chief of Polic_ ~-`.-=-i-f=• An alternative parade permit shall conform to the requirement of and shall have the effect of a parade permit under this Chapter. Sec. 14-25. Contents Each parade permit shall contain the following information: (1) Date of the parade. (2) Starting time and termination time of the parade. (3) The portions of the streets to be traversed that may be occupied by the parade. (4) The number of persons, animals and motor vehicles that will be in the parade. (5) Such other information as the Chief of Police -~= shall find necessary for the enforcement of this chapter. Sec. 14-26. Copy to be sent to certain officials. June 26, 1990 492 Count is the County of Roanoke, Vir4inia. Director means the Director of Parks and Recreation and includes any person whom the Director designates to act for the Director hereunder. Park and other areas, now or in the future operated and maintained by the County of Roanoke Department of Parks and Recreation, are defined to mean parks, public lands, playgrounds, recreation fields, museums, building, lakes, streams, lagoons, water areas, and submerged lands, and all public service facilities located on or in grounds,~waters, buildings and structures in Roanoke County which are under the control of or assigned for upkeep, maintenance or operation by the County of Roanoke, Department of Parks and Recreation, including property of the Roanoke County School Board. Person is any person, firm, partnership, association, corporation, company, or organization of any kind. Vehicle means every device in, upon, or by which any person or property may be transported upon a highway, except devices moved by power collected from overhead electric trolley wires, or used exclusively upon stationary rails or tracks, and except devices other than bicycles moved by human power. Permit is any written license issued by or under the authority of the Director of Parks and Recreation permitting the performance of a specified act or acts. Parkins means the standing of a vehicle, whether occupied or not, otherwise than temporarily for the purpose of June 26, 1990 494 provision of these regulations and such supplementary regulation as may be issued subsequently by the Director. 3. Obey traffic sictns. Fail to observe all traffic signs indicating speed, direction, caution, stopping or parking and all others posted for property control and to safeguard life and property. 4. Speed of vehicles. Ride or drive a vehicle at a rate of speed exceeding 15 miles per hour, except upon such park roads as the County may designate, by posted signs, for other speed limits. 5. 0 eration confined to roads. Drive any vehicle on any area except the paved park roads or parking areas, or such other areas as may on occasion be specifically designated as temporary parking areas by the Director. 6. Snowmobiles, etc. Operate in any park or recreation area snowmobiles, hovercraft, minibikes, motorcycles, go-carts, ATVs, mopeds or any other vehicles except in areas specifically designated by the Director for such use. 7. Trucks and commercial vehicles. Shall operate in or through any park, any trucks or commercial vehicles with a gross weight in excess of five (5) tons, except for the delivery of the load thereon for use in such parks as expressly approved by the Director. 8. Parkins. p,. Designated areas. Park a vehicle in other than an established or designated area, and such use shall be in June 26, 1990 4~ 6 3. Permit. A permit shall be obtained from the .- Director before participating in a park activity prohibited by these rules: B. Standards of Issuance. The Director may issue a permit hereunder when he finds: that the proposed activity or use of the park will not unreasonably interfere or detract from the general public enjoyment of the park; that the proposed activity and use will not unreasonably interfere with or detract from the promotion of public health, welfare, safety or_recreation; that the proposed activity or use is not reasonably anticipated to incite violence, crime or disorderly conduct; that the proposed activity will not entail unusual, extra-ordinary or burdensome expense or allocation of manpower resources by the Roanoke County Police Department °` ' `F'" " """'""""'` or other operation by the r County; that the facilities desired have not been reserved for other use at the day and hour required in the application. 2. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after July 1, 1990. On motion of Supervisor Eddy to waive the second reading and adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Robers NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens • 498 • June 26, 1990 BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, as follows: 1. That Chapter 16, currently Precious Metals and Gems, of the Roanoke County Code be, and it hereby is, amended and reenacted as Chapter 16A Precious Metals and Gems by amending and reenacting Sections 16-21 through 16-32 and Sections 16-41 through 16-48 to read and provide as follows: Chapter 16A PRECIOUS METALS•AND GEMS ARTICLE I. GENERALLY Sec. 16A-21. Definitions. The following words, terms, and phrases, when used in this Chapter, shall have the meanings ascribed to them in this Section, except where the context clearly indicates a different meaning: "Coin" means any piece of gold, silver, or other metal fashioned into a prescribed shape, weight, and degree of fineness, stamped by authority of a government with certain marks and devices, and having a certain fixed value as money. "Dealer" means any person,•firm, partnership or corporation engaged in the business of purchasing secondhand precious metals or gems, removing in any manner precious metals or gems from manufactured articles not then owned by such person, firm, partnership or corporation, buying, acquiring or selling precious metals or gems removed from such manufactured articles. "Dealer" shall mean any employee or agent who makes any such 500 June 26, 1990 _ - -- -- "Gems" means precious or semiprecious stones customarily used in jewelry whether loose or in a setting. "precious metals" means any item, except coins, composed in whole or in part of gold, silver, platinum or platinum alloys. sec. 16A-22. violations of Chapter generally. Any person convicted of violating any provisions of this Chapter shall be guilty of a Class 2 misdemeanor for the first offense. Upon conviction of any subsequent offense, he shall be guilty of a Class 1 misdemeanor. Sec. 16A-23. Chapter not applicable to sale or purchase of coins. The provisions of this Chapter shall not apply to the sale or purchase of coins. Sec. 16A-23.1 Chapter not applicable to financial institutions. The provisions of this Chapter shall not apply to any bank or branch thereof, trust company, or bank holding company, or any wholly-owned subsidiary thereof, engaged in the business of buying and selling gold and silver bullion. Sec. 16A-24. Aaiver of Article provisions for certain exhibitions and shows. The Chief of Police ..::~=may waive, by written notice, any provision of this Chapter, except Section 16-30, for particular numismatic, gem or antique exhibitions or craft shows sponsored by nonprofit organizations, provided the purpose of the exhibitions or shows is nonprofit in nature, notwithstanding the 0 502 June 26, 1990 cover all employees and all transactions occurring at a single location. (c) If any person shall be aggrieved by the misconduct of any dealer who has violated the provision of this Chapter, he may maintain an action for recovery in any court of proper jurisdiction against such dealer and his surety, provided that recovery against the surety shall be only for that amount of the judgment, if any, which is unsatisfied by the dealer. Sec. 16A-27. Notice of closing and reopening of business; location of business. If the business of a dealer is not operated without interruption, Saturdays, Sundays and recognized holidays excepted, for a period of not less than ten days" the dealer ~---~~ °£ of all closin s and shall notify the Chief of Police ~_~___-= g reopenings of such business. The business of a dealer shall be conducted only from the fixed and permanent location specified in his application for a permit under this Chapter. Sec. 16A-28. Identification of persons from whom purchases made. No dealer shall purchase precious metal or gems, without first ascertaining the identity of the seller, by requiring an identification card or document issued by a governmental agency, with a photograph of the seller thereon, and at least one other corroborating means of identification, and obtaining a statement of ownership from the seller. Sec. 16A-29. Record of Purchases. 504 June 26, 1990 from any person who is under the age of eighteen (18) years. (b) No dealer shall purchase precious metals or gems from any person who the dealer believes, or has reason to believe, is not the owner of such items, unless such person has written and duly authenticated authorization from the owner permitting and directing such sale. (c) No dealer shall purchase or sell any precious metals or gems except at the place of business as identified in the application required by Section 16-42. Sec. 16A-31. Retention of purchases. (a) A dealer shall retain all precious metals or gems purchased by him for a minimum of ten (10) calendar days from the date on which a copy of the bill of sale is received by the Chief of Police ~~e~f-f-Pursuant to Section 16-29. Until the expiration of this period, the dealer shall not sell, alter or dispose of a purchased item, in whole or in part, or remove it from the county. (b) If a dealer performs the service of removing precious metals or gems, he shall retain the metals or gems removed and the article from which the removal was made for a period of ten (10) calendar days after receiving such article and precious metals or gems. Sec. 16A-32. Record of sales. Each dealer shall keep and maintain, for at least twenty-four (24) months, an accurate and legible record of the name and address of the person to whom he sells any precious 5os June 26, 1990 the applicant must have all weighing devices used in his business inspected and approved by county or state weights and measures officials and present written evidet~ce of such approval to the Chief of Police ~_• As a condition for renewal of any permit, as permitted under Section 16-46, each dealer shall provide written evidence of an inspection and approval within thirty (30) days prior to such renewal date. Sec. 16A-~4. Issuance or denial. Upon the filing of a proper application for a permit under this Article and compliance with the provisions of this Article and of Section 16-26, the applicant shall be issued a ----~' °£ rovided the applicant has permit by the Chief of Police ~_, P not been convicted of a felony or crime of moral turpitude within seven (7) years prior to the date of~application. The permit shall be denied if the applicant has been denied a permit or has had a permit revoked under this Chapter or any ordinance of this county or another jurisdiction similar in substance to the provisions of this Chapter. Any false or misleading information provided on the application form required by Section 16-42 may be grounds for denial of a permit. Sec. 16A-45. Not transferable. No permit issued under this Article shall be transferable. Sec. 16A-46. Term; renewal. A permit issued under this Article shall be valid for ear from the date issued, unless sooner revoked, and may one (1) y June 26, 1990 508 - ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens 2. Ordinance establishing a County Police Force for the County of Roanoke, Roanoke County Code Chaeter 16. Sections 1 - 18. 0-62690-10 Mr. Mahoney presented several minor changes regarding policies and procedures and explained that the procedures must be in accordance with the County employee handbook. Changes in policies and procedures will be incorporated into the handbook and brought to the board for approval. Supervisor Johnson expressed concern about the possible procedures regarding drug testing and asked that such changes be brought back to the board before implementation. Supervisor Eddy asked if there were problems with the ordinance going into effect immediately when the Police Department will not go into effect until July 1. Mr. Mahoney responded that the body of the ordinance stipulates commencement of operations on July 1. Supervisor Johnson moved to adopt the ordinance. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Robers NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens ORDINANCE 62690-10 ESTABLISHING A June 26, 1990 Sip Sec. 16-1. Establishment of Police Department. A police department consisting of a Chief of Police and officers of such rank and experience as the chief shall determine is hereby created for the County of Roanoke, Virginia. This department shall be known as the Roanoke County Police Department. • Sec. 16-2. Duties and authority of Police Department and its officers . The Roanoke County Police Department shall exercise all the powers and duties imposed upon police by the provisions of Chapter 3 of Title 15.1 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, or its successors as it may from time to time appear. The police officers constituting this department are invested with and authorized to exercise all of the power and authority which pertains to the office of constable at common law within the territorial limits of the County of Roanoke, including the Town of Vinton, in taking cognizance of and enforcing the criminal laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia and the ordinances and regulation of the County of Roanoke. Sec. 16-3. Limitations on board actions. Neither the board nor any of its members shall direct the appointment, promotion or removal of any officer or employee of the Police Department nor interfere with the Chief of Police in the exercise of his judgment in any such matters. Except for the purpose of inquiry, the members of the board shall deal with the Chief of Police and any officers of the June 26, 1990 512 officer of all contiguous jurisdictions, in so far as reasonaD~y possible. The Chief of Police shall keep the County Administrator informed of the operations of his department and of significant matters affecting the public safety of the County of Roanoke and shall make such reports to the Administrator and the Board of Supervisors as shall be periodically required. Article III. officers and Employees Sec. 16-7. Selection and appointment of police officers; oaths. The officers of the Roanoke County Police Department shall be selected, appointed, promoted, disciplined and terminated by the Chief of Police in accordance with the procedures established in the Roano)c~ County Employee Handbook. To assist the Chief in hiring the most capable and qualified officers, he shall be authorized to establish such selection procedures, including the administration of tests or other measurements, as are consistent with professional police practices. Prior to receiving his badge of office, each officer shall take an oath as prescribed by state statute or local ordinance. Sec. 16-8. Powers and duties of police officers. Every officer of this department shall have all powers and authority as stated in Seca 16 - 2 above. It shall be the duty of every officer of this department to use his best efforts to preserve and enforce the criminal laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia and the ordinances and regulation of the County of June 26, 1990 or the Commonwealth or for any organization which provides services to the Police Department which are reasonably adequate to offset the revenue to be derived from such fees. Sec. 16-ii. Fingerprinting. The Police Department shall record fingerprint impressions on fingerprint cards for any individual upon the payment of a fee of $10.00. No fee shall be charged where fingerprinting shall be a condition of employment of any agency of this local government, or where performed at the request of another law-enforcement agency or authorized representative of the armed forces of the United States or the Commonwealth. The Chief of Police is authorized to waive this fee in connection with the fingerprinting of minors conducted by the department in connection with any public service project or promotion, in his discretion. Sec. 16-12. Accident reports. The Police Department shall keep on file such records of traffic accidents occurring in the County of Roanoke as the Chief of Police shall require. Upon the payment of a fee of $10.00 to defray the cost of providipg such reports, the Chief of Police may make available the originals and permit copying of such reports to any person directly involved in a particular accident, their legal or other authorized representative, any authorized representative of any insurance carrier reasonably anticipating exposure to civil liability as a consequence of the accident or any party who suffered personal injury or property 516 June 26, 1990 this Article, the Chief of Police, or his duly designated representative, shall make reasonable attempts to notify the rightful owner of the property, obtain from the Commonwealth's Attorney, in writing, a statement advising that the property is not needed in any criminal prosecution and cause to be published, in a newspaper of general circulation in the county, once a week for two (2) successive weeks, notice that there will be a public sale of such unclaimed personal property. Such property shall be described generally in the notice, together with the date, time and place of the sale. Sec. 16-17. Disposition of sale proceeds. The Chief of Police, or his duly designated representative, shall pay, from the proceeds of any sale made pursuant to this Article, the costs of advertisement, removal, storage, investigation as to ownership and liens and notice of sale. The balance of such funds shall be deposited with the Treasurer of Roanoke County for the account of the Chief of Police and paid to the owner upon satisfactory proof of ownership. If no claim has been made by the owner for such funds within sixty (60) days of the sale, the remaining funds shall be deposited in the general fund of the county. Any such owner shall be entitled to apply to the county within three (3) years from the date of the sale and, if timely application is made therefor, the county shall pay the remaining proceeds of the sale to the owner, without interest or other charges. No claim shall be made nor any suit, action or proceeding be instituted for the recovery 51 8 • June 26, 1990 auxiliary police force. The ordinanbe has been clarified as the board requested at the last meeting. Supervisor Johnson advised that he felt no changes to the auxiliary police force should affect those currently on the Sheriff's auxiliary police. Mr. Hodge responded that Chief Cease will meet with those currently on the auxiliary to work out the details, but that there will be training necessary for those who will carry a gun or engage in other law enforcement patrol. Those who do not desire to take the training may continue in office functions. Supervisor Eddy moved to adopt the ordinance. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Robers NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens ORDINANCE 62690-11 AMENDING THE ROANORE COUNTY CODE BY THE ADDITION OF S 16-19 TO CHAPTER 16, POLICE, ESTABLISHING AN AUgILIARY POLICE FORCE IN ROANORE COUNTY WHEREAS, the Chief of Police of the Roanoke County Police Department has expressed a desire to establish a program to provide for an auxiliary police force in Roanoke County, Virginia, which said auxiliary police force shall be trained in police procedures and shall be available as a supplementary force for use for various police activities and functions in Roanoke County; and 520 June 26, 1990 uniform of the Roanoke County Police Department with a designation thereon that such officer is a member of the auxiliary police force when in the performance of their duties. (e) All auxiliary police officers shall follow and fully comply with all established policies procedures, rules and regulations of the Roanoke County Police Department. 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after July 1, 1990. ' On motion of Supervisor Eddy to adopt ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Robers NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens 4. Ordinance amending the Roanoke County Code, Cha ter 12 Motor Vehicles and Traffic Article III of the Roanoke County Code, to prohibit parking in Fire Lanes. 0-62690-12 Mr. Mahoney advised this ordinance incorporates in the local code changes from the General Assembly session. He further advised he will bring a report back to the Board at the last meeting in July on all parking fines and fees. Supervisor Johnson moved to adopt the ordinance. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Robers NAYS: None 522 June 26, 1990 Prevention Code of the County of Roanoke. (b) The fire Marshall or any law-enforcement officer may enforce this section in accordance with the provisions of this Chapter and may have any motor 'vehicle parked in violation of this section towed to a garage or parking lot for storage, at the expense of the owner of such motor vehicle. 2. That this amendment and readoption shall be in full force and effect on and after July 1, 1990. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Robers NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens 5. Ordinance amending Chanter 12, Motor Vehicles and Traffic, Section 12-8, of Article I of Chapter 12 of the Roanoke County Code 0-62690-13 Mr. Mahoney advised this ordinance also brings the Roanoke County Code in compliance with regulations approved in the General Assembly. Supervisor Johnson moved to adopt the ordinance. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Robers NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens • June 26, 190 524 provision or requirement hereby adopted exceed the penalty imposed for a similar offense under the state law hereby adopted. The ahrase "all of the provisions and requirements of the laws of the state" as used hereb shall be construed to 'nclude al amendments to said laws made effective as of the date that this ordinance is itself effective. 2. The effective date of this ordinance shall be July 1, 1990. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, 7ohnson, Robers NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens IN RE: REPORTS AND INQIIIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS SUPERVISOR EDDY: (1) Asked about the evaluations of the County Attorney and County Administrator. Chairman Robers informed him this would be done in executive session. (2) Announced he had read and heard statements regarding comments by Roanoke City Council pertaining to cooperation. He suggested asking for clarification from Roanoke City. (3) Advised that in response to a citizen complaint on penalties for late filing of Personal Property tax, he received an opinion from Attorney General stating that jurisdictions are limited in penalties assessed for late personal property filing to the greater of ten 526 June 26, 1990 through 5, inclusive, as follows: 1. Approval of Minutes - May 29, 1990 2. Confirmation of Committee Appointments to the Community Corrections Resources Board and Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission. 3. Approval of Fireworks Permit - Hills Department Store. 4. Approval of Fireworks Permit - Town of Vinton. 5. Donation of Right-of-way, Map of Countrywood, Plat Book 9, Page 143 and amended resolution requesting acceptance of Countrywood Drive into the VDOT Secondary System. 2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this resolution. On motion of Supervisor Johnson, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Robers NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens IN RE: EBECUTZVE SESSION At 9:15 p.m., Supervisor Johnson moved to go into Executive Session pursuant to the Code of Virginia 2.1-344 A (1) to consider a personnel matter, the evaluation of the County Administrator and County Attorney. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Robers 528 June 26, 1990 executive meeting which this certification resolution applies, and 2. Only such public business matters as were identified in the motion convening the executive meeting were heard, discussed or considered by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. On motion of Supervisor Robers, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Robers NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens IN RE: SETTING OF COIINTY ADMINISTRATOR AND COIINTY ATTORNEY SALARIES Supervisor Johnson moved to set the County Attorney's salary for 1990-91 at $75,460, plus a~$5,000 fringe benefit package. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McGraw, Johnson, Robers NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens ABSTAIN: Supervisor Eddy Supervisor McGraw moved to set the County Administrator's salary for 1990-91 at $92,000, plus a $5,000 fringe benefit package. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McGraw, Johnson, Robers July 10, 1990 "~ ,~ 530 Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Roanoke County Administration Center 3738 Brambleton Avenue, SW Roanoke, Virginia 24018 July 10, 1990 The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, met this day at the Roanoke County Administration Center, this being the second Tuesday, and the first regularly scheduled meeting of the month of July, 1990. IN RE: CALL TO ORDER . Chairman Robers called the meeting to order at 3:07 p.m. The roll call was taken. MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Richard Robers, Vice Chairman Steven A. McGraw, Supervisors Lee B. Eddy, Bob L. Johnson, Harry C. Nickens MEMBERS ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator; John M. Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator for Human Services; John R. Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator of Community Services and Development; Don Myers, Assistant County Administrator for Management Services; Paul M'. Mahoney, County Attorney, Mary H. Allen, Clerk to the Board; Anne Marie Green, Information Officer 53~ July 10, 1990 Assistant County Administrator John Chambliss and Parks and Recreation Director Stephen Carpenter assisted Board Chairman Richard Robers in presenting the framed Resolution to Mrs. Shell. Supervisor Nickens moved to adopt the resolution. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None RESOLUTION 71090-1 OFFICIALLY DESIGNATING PENN FOREST PARR AS C. DARRELL SHELL MEMORIAL PARR WHEREAS, C. Darrell Shell began employment with the County of Roanoke in 1967, serving as the County's first Director of Parks & Recreation; and WHEREAS, Mr. Shell worked tirelessly with the County Administration and School Administration to jointly use recreational facilities, thereby reducing the need to purchase additional land and reducing development costs to provide recreational .opportunities to County residents; and ABEREAB, Mr. Shell was instrumental in obtaining matching grants whereby the level of benefit from the County's investment was increased by leveraging local contributions against the matching grants; and AHEREA3, Penn Forest Park serves as an outstanding example of these many facets of Mr. Shell's work for his community. NOA, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of July 10, 1990 534 accumulated rather than work begun and the funds allocated. Mr. Henry responded that the staff had been working on revenue sharing funds and bond money projects because the funds had to be spent in a three-year time period. Supervisor Eddy suggested that the method for prioritization could be revised to get the maximum benefit by prioritizing by the least cost per family served. Mr. Henry advised he was agreeable to changing the system but the methodology was developed and approved by the Board in 1989. Supervisor Nickens moved to approve the Rural Addition Priority List. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None 3, Request from School Bard for appropriation to the School Textbook Fund for 1989-90. A-71090-3 Dr. Jerry Hardy, Budget Director for County Schools, reported that the School Administration has received a $22,000 refund for returned textbooks and the funds have been expended for textbooks and materials for special education. He requested that the board allocate those funds to the 1989-90 school board budget to cover the appropriation. Supervisor Nickens moved to appropriate the funds. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: 0 536 July 10, 1990 ____ 5, ~-p royal of Response to Senator Granger MacFar ane e4ardina the priorities for state and federal funding in the Roanoke Valley Supervisor Johnson advised that he was concerned about a recent letter from State Senator Granger MacFarlane who expressed concern about a list of projects in the Roanoke Valley that could be undercut by state and federal funding for Explore, and felt that the projects should be prioritized. Supervisor Johnson presented a draft response pointing out that many of these projects are not entitled to state and federal funds, and expressing continued Board of Supervisors support for the Explore project. Supervisor Eddy expressed reservation about several of the projects and felt the Board should not antagonize Senator MacFarlane. He advised he did not support sending the letter. Supervisor Nickens stated his support for sending the letter and did not feel it would alienate the senator. He asked the County Administrator to report back to the Board in 30 days on possible County efforts to move the Explore Project forward. Supervisor Nickens moved to send the letter with a minor amendment suggested by Supervisor McGraw. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: Supervisor Eddy IN RE: FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 53~ July 10, 1990 staff report stating that commercial development should not be encouraged on Hardy Road at this time. Supervisor Nickens moved to approve the rezoning. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: Supervisor Eddy ORDINANCE 71090-5 TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF APPROBIMATELY 1.25 ACRES OF A 2.56-ACRE PARCEL OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED ON HARDY ROAD APPROBIMATELY 0.4 MILE WEBT OF FEATHER ROAD (STATE ROOTE 654) (TAB MAP NO. 71.07-1-41) IN THE VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF R- 1 TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF B-2 AITH CONDITIONS OPON THE APPLICATION OF HENRY J. BRASHAM IV WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on June 12, 1990, and the second reading and public hearing was held June 26, 1990; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on June 5. 1990; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. • BE ZT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing approximately 1.25 acres of a 2.56-acre parcel of real estate, as described herein, and located on Hardy Road approximately 0.4 mile west of Feather Road (State Route 540 July 10, 1990 Secondary Route 634, the chord of which is N. 53 deg. 27' 28" W. and which was an arc of 178.62 feet to the point of beginning and consisting of 1.143 acres. 5. That the effective date'of this ordinance shall be my 10, 1990. On motion of Supervisor Nickens to approve ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: Supervisor Eddy IN RE: APPOINTMENTS A-71090-6 1. Building Code Board of Adjustments and Appeals Supervisor Johnson nominated Larry Lester to a four- year term as an alternate member. His term will expire July 25, 1994. 2. Cable TV Negotiating Committee Supervisor Robers nominated Supervisor McGraw to serve on this committee. 3. Lea a of Older Americans Board of Directors Supervisor McGraw nominated Murry White to fill the unexpired term of Matthew Banks. The term will expire March 31, 1991. The above nominations were. approved by unanimous voice 542 July 10, 1990 He advised he will be attending the National Association of Counties Conference in Miami, representing both VACo and Roanoke County. SUPERVISOR JOHNSON: (1) Asked for a resolution of congratulations and support be prepared for the July 24, 1990 meeting, congratulating the Virginia Amateur Sports Foundation on their achievement and success at the recent state games. (2) Asked staff to initiate discussions with Botetourt County officials and Roanoke County and Botetourt County school boards regarding the possibility of a joint'school with Botetourt County. SUPERVISOR ROBERS: Reported that staff from VPI&SU has met with the Center for Innovative Technology to discuss what part they will play in development of the "Smart Highway". IN RE: CONSENT AGENDA Supervisor Robers moved to approve the Consent Agenda. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None RESOLUTION 71090-7 APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED 544 July 10, 1990 ro ert damage ca su ed by runoff from Hidden Valley regarding p p Y Junior Hiqh School. Following discussion of the problems, Chairman Robers directed the staff to investigate and report back to the Board on July 24, 1990. IN RE: REPORTS • Supervisor Nickens moved to receive and file the following reports. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: YES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None 1. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance 2. General Fund Unappropriated Balance 3. Board Contingency Fund IN RE: WORK SESSION 1. 1991 Le islative Pro am - Vir inia Association of Counties Mr. Mahoney reported that he had received suggestions from Board members and staff regarding recommended legislative requests. Nine requests were received. He pointed out that these were state-wide issues to be sent to VACo, and additional local issues may be added at a later date. Supervisor McGraw suggested that the County support the Grayson Commission as VACo supports interlocal cooperation rather 54 6 July 10, 1990 The following citizens spoke regarding the proposed consolidation agreement. 1. Lee Blair, 7713 Old Mill Forest, representing the County Alliance for Regional Excellence spoke in support of the proposed consolidation agreement. 2. Winton Shelor, 4348 Shelor Farm Lane, Salem, President of the Mason Cove Civic League urged the Board to continue to negotiate with the City of Salem to allow the citizens of Catawba a second vote to join Salem. 3. David Courey, 3419 Ashmeade Drive, spoke in opposition to the present plan. 4. Lela Spitz, 1971 Oak Drive, Salem, spoke in opposition, stating with the changes to the agreement the pro forma budget is not correct. 5. Don Terp, 5140 Apple Tree Drive, spoke in opposition and advised .that citizens are confused because of all the changes to the proposed agreement. Supervisor McGraw moved to approve the amendments to the agreement. Supervisor Johnson asked for a separate vote on each issue. Supervisor Nickens offered a substitute motion to adopt the original plan regarding school board composition. The motion was defeated by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Nickens NAYS: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, i2obers Supervisor McGraw moved to approved the amended school July 10, 1990 54 8 NAYS: Supervisor Nickens Supervisor Eddy asked the County Attorney if the Board should vote on the entire prepared resolution to send to the Circuit Court. Mr. Mahoney responded that the vote on each issue can be included under the appropriate section of the resolution and a vote to adopt and forward the resolution forward was not necessary. Supervisor Johnson advised he misunderstood the issue that was being voted on and thought that the previous vote was to adopt the resolution to send forward to the Circuit Court and not a vote to expand the territory giving a second referendum. He moved to reconsider. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES• Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None Supervisor McGraw moved to expand the territory allowed a second vote to join the City of Salem. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Robers NAYS: Supervisors Johnson, Nickens RESOLUTION 71090-8 AUTHORIZING THE EBECIITION OF AMENDMENTS TO THE CONSOLIDATION AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE COUNTY OF ROANORE AND THE CITY OF ROANORE, DIRECTING THE FILING OF SAID AMENDMENTS AND OTHER PAPERS WITH THE CIRCIIIT COURTS FOR THE CITY AND THE COUNTY, AND AUTHORIZING FURTHER PROCEEDINGS IN ACCORDANCE THEREWITH 550 July 10, 1990 attest, Amendments to the Consolidation Agreement between the City and the County, dated July 11, 1990, a copy of which is on file in the Office of the Clerk to the Board. 2. That all amendments and other legal documents this resolution shall be approved as to form by the authorized by County Attorney. 3. That the County Attorney shall be authorized to an etitions, pleadings, file, for and on behalf of the County, Y P applications, certificates and other legal papers with Federal and State courts and administrative agencies as are deemed necessary and proper by him to permit the question of nsolidation to be considered at referendum on November 6, 1990. co 4. That the Clerk to the Board is directed to forward an attested copy of this resolution to the Clerk of the Council of the City of Roanoke, the Clerk of the Vinton Town Council, the Clerk of the City of Salem Council, and the Judges of the Circuit Courts for the City and the County. Supervisor Johnson requested that the issues be separated. 1) Section 12 Education. Expand the composition of school board by the addition of two members. On motion of Supervisor McGraw to approve amended school board composition, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Robers NAYS: Supervisors Johnson, Nickens 0 July 10, 1990 552 Supervisor Johnson moved to adopt the ordinance. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None ORDINANCE 71090-9 VACATING A 20-FOOT WATERLINE EASEMENT LOCATED ON LOTS 9 AND 10, BLOCK 1, SECTION 8, LaBELLVUE SUBDIVISION, HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, Paul T. Hatam has requested the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia to vacate a 20-foot waterline easement located on Lots 9 and 10, Block 1, Section 8, LaBellvue Subdivision in the Hollins Magisterial District as shown in Plat Book 9, at page 260 of~record in the Clerk's Office of the Roanoke County Circuit Court; and, WHEREAS, Section 15.1-482 (b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, requires that such action be accomplished by the adoption of an ordinance by the governing body; and, WHEREAS, notice has been given as required by Section 15.1-431 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and a first reading of this ordinance was held on June 26, 1990; and the second reading of this ordinance was held on July 10, 1990. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That a 20-foot waterline easement located on Lots 9 and 10, Block 1, Section 8, LaBellvue Subdivision in the Hollins Magisterial District of record in Plat Book 9, at page 260, in ~~~ J 5 July 24, 1990 Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Roanoke County Administration Center 3738 Brambleton Avenue, S.W. Roanoke, Virginia 24018 July 24, 1990 The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, met this day at the Roanoke County Administration Center, this being the second Tuesday, and the second regularly scheduled meeting of the month of July, 1990. II,J RE ; CALL TO ORDER Chairman Robers called the meeting to order at 3:00 p.m. The roll call was taken. MEMBERS PRESENT: Chats Graw 1SuperyisorsbLee~B.lEddyhaBobaL,Steven A. Johnson, Harry C. Nickens MEMBERS ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: John R. Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator John M. for Community Services and Development; Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator for Human Services; Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance; Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney; Mary H. Allen, Clerk; Anne Marie Green, Information 556 July 24, 1990 "-"moo a e es rom a ov tre he Commonwealth to participate in the various events; and WHEREAS, thousands of people visited the Roanoke Valley during the three days of the Games, providing an economic benefit to area businesses; and WHEREAS, CorEast Savings Bank sponsored the 1990 Virginia State Games, providing funding and support to Virginia Amateur Sports, Inc.; and WHEREAS, the 1990 Virginia State Games were a tremendous success and an event of which the Roanoke Valley can be proud. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors hereby expresses its appreciation, and the appreciation of its citizens to VIRGINIA AMATEUR SPORTS, INC., and to COREAST SAVINGS BANK for bringing the 1990 Virginia State Games to the Roanoke Valley; and FURTHER, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors extends its sincere wishes for the continued success of the Games in the Roanoke Valley. On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None 2. Reco nition of Diane H att Director Finance for winnin National Association of Counties Information Officers Award for Eucellence for the Comvrehensive 558 July 24, 1990 a ve cos s an equipment costs; and (c) support the enactment of legislation granting equal borrowing and taxation powers for cities and counties. Supervisor McGraw suggested that at some point in the process an addition to Item (c) should be made because of the possibility of the state giving the deficit back to localities. Supervisor Eddy inquired when consideration would be given to 1991 legislative items for local legislators. Mr. Mahoney advised that the local legislators would be invited to a special meeting in October or November at which time local legislative requests would be presented. Supervisor Nickens moved to adopt the resolution. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None RESOLIITION 72490-2 REQIIESTING THE VIRGINIA ASSOCIATION OF COIINTIES TO CONBIDER CERTAIN ISSIIES OF STATEWIDE BIGNZFICANCE FOR ADOPTION IN ITS 1991 LEGISLATIVE PROGRAM WHEREAS, the Virginia Association of Counties annually adopts a legislative program for submission to the General Assembly for the Commonwealth of Virginia; and, WHEREAS, the Virginia Association of Counties has requested its membership to submit to it issues of statewide significance for consideration and adoption in its 1991 legislative program; and, WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, ~~~.. July 24, 1990 County Attorney Paul Mahoney advised that at the June 26, 1990, board meeting, a claim was denied from Mr. and Mrs. Wright-for the County to restore the drainage channel on the Wrights' property to the condition it was prior to the alternations. The present claim involves the same facts and circumstances and the Wrights are requesting an award of punitive damages for "aggravated trespass". Mr. Mahoney further advised that a finding of compensatory damage is necessary for an award of punitive damages. It is anticipated that the Wrights will pursue their claim in the Circuit Court. Mr. Mahoney recommended this claim be denied. Supervisor Nickens moved that the claim be denied. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None 4. Rectuest for authorization for yarticipation in the FEMA community Rating system. A-72490-4 County Engineering Director Phillip Henry advised that the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) recently initiated a Community Rating System (CRS) program to reward and recognize Community Programs which reduce the impact and frequency of flooding. CRS is similar to an insurance rating which allows a reduction in 562 July 24, 1990 ommission a een scheduled. Assistant County Administrator ~vnri Hubbard advised that staff has one date acceptable to Planning Commission members and is obtaining additional dates from the Planning Commission. IN RE: REQUESTB FOR PQBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING FOR REZONING ORDINANCE - CONSENT AGENDA Supervisor Johnson moved to approve the first readings and set the public hearings for August 28, 1990. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None 1. An ordinance modifying an existing Planned Unit Development plan on a 2 acre tract generally located within the Stonehenge PUD, south of Kelly Lane in the Cave Spring Magisterial District. This request is to permit the construction of a 16 unit, single building condominium, upon the request of J. Allison Associates. 2. An ordinance modifying the proffered conditions on a 24.94 acre tract to increase the size (number of bedrooms) of a portion of the 264 apartment units previously approved; located on the west side of Colonial Avenue, near the intersection of Ogden Road in the Cave Spring Magisterial District, upon the request of Occidental Development Ltd. 3. An ordinance modifying the proffered conditions on approximately .25 acres to allow the use of the property for a take-out restaurant and food service, with the existing office and video store, located at 5314 Fallowater Drive in the Cave Spring Magisterial District, upon the request of John Lee Davenport. 4. An ordinance rezoning two parcels containing a total of July 24, 1990 _ ~ ~r_ a or finance. T e motion carr by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None ORDINANCE 490-C OIBITIONIOF REAL ESTATE CAND A RIGHTDOF WAY EBATE AND THE A 4 FOR THE FORT LEWIB E-911 TOWER BITE WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on July 24, 1990; and the second reading of this ordinance was waived pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter, in that an emergency is deemed to exist; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.01 of the Roanoke County Charter, certain real estate has been deemed to be surplus in relation to the use for which it was originally acquired, and is hereby made available for disposition. THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, as follows: 1) That the conveyance of that certain tract of real estate (Tax Map No. 43.00-1-43) containing approximately 5.25 acres of real estate, previously a well lot, and designated as Lots 1 through 7 and 7A of Talking Leaves Park (as shown in Plat Book 3, Page 200 in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia) to David W. Shelor and Constance R. Shelor is hereby authorized and approved. 2) That the acquisition of a metal reservoir well lot (approximately 100'x 100') from David W. Shelor and Constance R. ~ ~ ~ July 24, 1990 Assistant County Administrator John Chambliss advised that at the May 22, 1990, first reading of this ordinance, there were concerns raised about protecting the youth activities and rather than trying to recover the full user fees from youth participants, it was suggested that a five dollar registration fee per participant be considered. Since the first reading, two meeting been held with representatives from the Recreation Clubs and two meeting were held with a sub-committee composed of one representative from each geographic region of the County. He advised that imposing fees for youth participation in activities was not desired by the recreation clubs but in lieu of the five dollars per participant registration fee, a compromise was suggested to allow the recreation clubs to provide the equipment, including the game balls, and also to drag and mark the ballfields (Baseball, softball, football and soccer), including providing the lime dust or paint for subsequent marking. This effort should generate a cost savings of $30,650 annually to the Parks & Recreation Budget. The fees for youth athletics were originally projected at $32,075. Mr. Chambliss advised that there was an amendment to paragraph "c" of the ordinance by inserting "clubs and department of Parks and Recreation shall implement cost savings and cost sharing alternatives to offset the fees which would have been generated through the suggested user fees ($30,650 in the 1990-91 Budget)". He July 24, 1990 ~ ~ .', ~ ~ ~ cia consideration and Mr. Chambliss assured him that provisions for this are contained in the ordinance. Supervisor McGraw asked Steve Carpenter about the inequity in the way the program is administered by taking the $32,000 from the unappropriated balance fund instead of from the users of youth athletic programs. Mr. Carpenter stated his belief that if additional fees are going to be levied through user fees for programs, there should be a general equity placement throughout all of the various program divisions. He would recommend a fee policy that could be broadly administered throughout the entire youth section as well as other recreation sections in the County. Mr. Carpenter advised that he supported the compromise whereby the County would receive value from volunteer work provided on behalf of the park maintenance division which would free up the park division to do other work but felt this system could not be used in the other program sections. Supervisor McGraw expressed concern about eliminating participation in various programs because of fee structure. Supervisor Nickens suggested that there should be a program of financial aid for youth participation similar to the reduced lunch program in schools. Mr. Chambliss advised that there is no uniform opinion among the recreation clubs about the compromise proposal. Some of the clubs are already marking the ballfields and some of the clubs indicated 570 July 24, 1990 - - ~ rs ips o program wou e effective; rate increase should be applied equally to all segments of the populations affected. (4) Jerry Hiqginbothan, 7215 Hollyberry Road, felt that even though park acreage has increased 70$, need to look at County for usable fields and not acreage; Cave Spring area has had only one field in last ten years. (5) Vince Joyce, 6039 Marsh Wren Lane, Vice Chairman, Parks & Recreation Advisory Commission, stated that the establishment of increased fees to help offset costs is fully endorsed by the Parks & Recreation Advisory Commission; they endorse the alternative compromise of recreation club maintenance in lieu of increased fees; they feel the new fee policy should not exclude youth athletics. Following further discussion, Supervisor Nickens moved the staff recommendation of adopting the revised ordinance with the modification in Paragraph "c", page 3, and amending the budget by $30,650. Supervisor Eddy offered a substitute motion to delay the second reading until the August 14, 1990 meeting for staff to bring back a report concerning the percentage of youth participation in other categories, including alternatives and evaluation of differential fees between youths and adults, with dollar costs. AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Johnson, Robers NAYS: Supervisors McGraw, Nickens 572 July 24, 1990 oun ies a no appropriated funds for and had not begun construction of a fire station on the parcel within five years, namely by November 24, 1991; and, WHEREAS, the Counties have reached an agreement to construct the joint fire station on a different parcel of land and the subject parcel will not be used for the specified purpose. THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter, the acquisition and disposition of real estate can be authorized only by ordinance. A first reading of this ordinance was held on July 10, 1990; and a second reading was held on July 24, 1990; and, 2. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.01 of the Charter of Roanoke County, the remaining rights in the subject parcel of real estate are hereby declared to be surplus and the condition applicable to the property renders it unacceptable and unavailable for other public uses; and,. 3. That reconveyance of the subject parcel, described as Parcel B, consisting of 2.183 acres, located to the north of Route 460 in the Roanoke-Botetourt Industrial Park, in the Bonsack area of the Blue Ridge District, County of Botetourt, Virginia, to the Greater Roanoke Valley Development Foundation and the Roanoke Valley Development Corporation, is hereby authorized. 4. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized to execute such documents and take such actions as may be necessary to J74 July 24, 1990 ven ing. a expresse apprecia received one day earlier than usual. IN RE: APPOINTMENTB on that agenda pacKet was 1. Board of Zoning Apyeals 2. Building Code Board of Adiustments and Aypeals 3. Communit Corrections Resource Board 4. Landfill Citizens Advisory Committee 5. Southwest yirainia Health Systems Aaenc A-72490-7 Supervisor Eddy moved to nominate and submit Richard W. Robers as nominee from Roanoke County for selection to the South Virginia Health Systems Agency Board of Directors. AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None IN RE: CONSENT AGENDA ALL MATTERS LISTED IINDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED July 24, 1990 5. Resolution requesting changes in Secondary System due to relocation and reconstruction of Brookridge Road (Route 660). 6. Resolution requesting changes in Secondary System due to relocation and reconstruction of Tinsley Lane (Route 711) . 7. Authorization to settle pending litigation with Fabricated Metals, Inc. for outstanding utility bills. 8. Resolution supporting Total Action Against Poverty's application for grant from the Virginia Indoor Plumbing Program 2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this resolution. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt resolution with minor corrections to maps on Items 3, 4, 5, and 6, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None RESOLIITION X2490-8.C REQIIESTING CHANGES IN BECONDARY BYSTEM DIIE TO RELOCATION AND RECONSTRIICTION OF SIIGARLOAF MOIINTAIN ROAD (ROIITE 692) BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That this matter came this day to be heard upon the proceedings herein, and upon the application of a portion Sugarloaf Mountain Road (Route 692) which was relocated and reconstructed under July 24, 1990 .. . ~~ RE80Lt1TION ?2490-8.d REQIIESTING CgANGE8 IId SECONDARY 8Y8TEl+t DII8 TO RELOCATION AND RECONSTRUCTION OF ROSELAWN ROAD (ROOTE 689) BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That this matter came this day to be heard upon the proceedings herein, and upon the application of a portion of Roselawn Road (Route 689) which was relocated and reconstructed under VDOT Project 0689-080-192; 2. That it appears to the Board of Supervisors that Secondary Route 689 from the intersection of Route 1537 eastward to 0.539 miles east of Route 1537, for a distance of 0.539 miles has been altered; new roads have been constructed and approved by the State Transportation Commission, which new roads serve the same citizens as the roads so altered; and these changes are shown on the attached sketch titled " CHANGES IN SECONDARY SYSTEM DUE TO RELOCATION AND RECONSTRUCTION ON ROUTE 689, PROJECT 0689-080-192,C-501, DATED AT RICHMOND, VIRGINIA, SEPTEMBER 26, 1986". 3. That the portions of Secondary Route 689, i.e., Sections 7, g, 9, 10 and 11, for a total distance of 0.23 miles; and that portions of Secondary Route 690, i.e., Sections 12 and 13 for a total distance of 0.10 miles be, and are hereby added to the Secondary System of State Highways pursuant to Section 33.1-229 of the Code of Virginia, as amended; 4. That sections of old locations of Route 689, i.e., Sections #1, 2, 3 and 5 for a total distance of 0.21 miles, and a Section of July 24, 1990 ~~ alte d anew road has been constructed and approves ny Lne aLa~~ Transportation Commissioner, which new road serves the same citizens as the road so altered; and these changes are shown on the attached sketch titled "CHANGES IN SECONDARY SYSTEM DUE TO RELOCATION AND RECONSTRUCTION OF ROUTE 660, PROJECT 0660-080-173-M-502, DATED IN RICHMOND, VIRGINIA, ON JULY 6, 1988"; 3. That the portion of Secondary Route 660, i.e., Section #2 for a distance of 0.118 miles be, and is hereby added to the Secondary System of State Highways, pursuant to Section 33.1-229 of the Code of Virginia, as amended; 4. That the section of old location, i.e., Section #1 for a distance of 0.04 miles, is hereby abandoned as a public road, pursuant to Section 33.1-155 of the Code of Virginia, as amended. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None RESOLIITION 72490-8.t RE4iJE8TING CHANGES IN BECONDARY BYSTEM DIIE TO RELOCATION AND RECONSTRUCTION OF TINSLEY LANE (ROIITE 711) BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That this matter came this day to be heard upon the proceedings herein, and upon the application of a portion of Tinsley Lane (Route 711) which was relocated and reconstructed under VDOT F, ~ w July 24, 1990 ~ - overnor L. Douglas Wilder and the 1990 General Assembly approved funding for the Indoor Plumbing Program to provide grants and loans for the improvement of plumbing facilities for lower- income Virginians; and WHEREAS, the goal of the Indoor Plumbing Program is to assist lower-income families and individuals in obtaining safe and decent sanitary facilities within their houses; and WHEREAS, Total Action Against Poverty's Housing and Emergency Rehab Program wishes to apply for a $250,000 grant to complete twenty-seven (27) indoor plumbing units, at a cost of approximately $8,333 per unit, plus energy improvements and water/sewage connections; and WHEREAS, these twenty-seven (27) units will be built in the Counties of Roanoke, Craig, Rockbridge, Alleghany, Botetourt and the area around the City of Salem. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, strongly endorses the proposed improvement of plumbing facilities for lower-income Virginians; and FURTHER, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, support Total Action Against Poverty's application for a grant from the Virginia Indoor Plumbing Program to construct these facilities. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None July 24, 1990 respons e for any claims or liability. Supervisor Nickens moved to refer this matter to the School Board and inform Mrs. Graham and Mr. Flora. AYES: Supervisor Eddy, McGraw, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Johnson S. Report on Disposal of Animal Waste (TO BE PROVIDED BY COIINTY ATTORNEY) Supervisor Eddy advised that Mr. Mahoney prepared this report as the result of a citizen complaint submitted to him. After discussion, Supervisor Eddy requested that the County Attorney and County Administrator write a letter to the owner of Seaboard Farms with the strong suggestion for them to follow directives issued in the past. It was the consensus of the Board that the County Attorney also proceed with writing a letter to the State Water Control Board to encourage their proceeding with enforcement activities. Supervisor Eddy requested that the Economic Development Director be consulted in the preparation of these letters. 6. Report on Penalty for Late Filing of Personal Property Tag (TO 88 PROVIDED BY COIINTY ATTORNEY) July 24, 1990 ession an a op a resolution certifying the Executive Session. motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisor Eddy, Nickens, McGraw, Robers NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Johnson RESOLOTION 72490-9 CERTIFYING E%ECDTIVS MEETING WAS HELD IN CONFORMITY WITH TH8 CODE OF VIRGINIA WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, 5~6 The Virginia has convened an executive meeting on this date pursuant to an affirmative recorded vote and in accordance with the provisions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and WHEREAS, Section 2.1-344.1 of the Code of Virginia requires a certification by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that such executive meeting was conducted in confonaity with Virginia law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby certifies that, to the best of each members knowledge: 1. Only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements by Virginia law were discussed in the executive meeting which this certification resolution applies, and 2. Only such public business matters as were identified in the motion convening the executive meeting were heard, discussed or considered by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. On motion of Supervisor Nickens, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Nickens, Robers ACTION NO. p,-81490-8.a ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF R ANOKE~D OUNTY UADMINISTRATIONRCENTER COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE MEETING DATE: August 14, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: Acceptance °f the SecondaryDSystem by the V rginia Route 612 into Department of Transportation COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Roanoke County has received acknowledgement stemtby thefVirginia roads has been accepted into the Secondary Sy Department of Transportation. - 0.29 miles of Countrywood Drive (Route 1999), effective 7/24/90 effective - 0.11 miles of Section 2 of new location Rt. 612, 7/30/90 - 0.28 miles of Section 1 of old location Rt. 612, effection 7/30/90 SUBMITTED BY: Mary H. Allen Clerk to the Board APPROVED BY: ~~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ------------- ---------------------------------- VOTE ACTION No yes Abs Motion by: •~ ~' ~" `'kPn~ Approved (x) Eddy .~- Denied ( Johnson ~. Received ( ) McGraw ~. Referred ( ) Nickens x To ( ) Robers x - cc: File En ineering Phillip Henry, Director, g r ~® criyr7 . ~i d ~'CMSta COl~R~®I~TW~~.LTH of VgR~~~T~A. RAY D. PETHTEL COMMISSIONER DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1401 EAST SROAD STREET RICHMOND, 23219 July 30, 1990 Secondary System Addition Roanoke County Board of Supervisors County of Roanoke p. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 MEMBERS OF THE BOARD: As requested in your resolution dated following addition to the Secondary System hereby approved, effective July 25, 1990. ADD_ ITI~N_ ~`~ June 12, 1990, the of Roanoke County is COUNTRYWOOD - From Route 221 to Route 1999 (Countrywood Drive) 0.29 mile North Route 221. Sincerely, ay D. Pethtel Commissioner TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21ST CENTURY LE_ NGTH 0.29 Mi. ~. 'I` 8. J~ Je4P[0. COMM®I~T~VE~LTH of `V~R~~IIvTT~A DEPARTMDE~eAS BROADS REORTATION RICHMOND, 23219 RAY D. PETHTEL 199(' July 3 0 , 19 9 0 COMMISSIONER ~ ~ t ~ 4l ` ~1„ij Secondary System Addition and Abandonment Roanoke County Project: 0612-080-P18, N501 Board of Supervisors County of Roanoke p, O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 - MEMBERS OF THE BOARD: the our resolution dated March 27, 1990, As requested in y S stem of following addition to and aba roved,1effective July n25 ry1990. Roanoke County are hereby app LENGT-H ADDITION Section 2 of new location Route 612, Project: 0612- 0.11 Mi. 080-P18, N501. ABANDONMENT Section 1 of old location Route 612, Project: 0612- 0.28 Mi. 080-P18, N501. Sincerely, a D. Pethtel mmissioner TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21ST CENTURY ACTION # A-81490-8.b ITEM NUMBER ~3 AT A REGULAR MEETD AT THEHROANOKED COUNTYEADMINISTRATION CENTER COUNTY, VIRGINIA HEL MEETING DATE: August 14, 1990 SU_T: Acceptance of Wat a Lion 2nitary Sewer Facilities Serving Kingston Court, S COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Developers of Kingston Court, have requested that Roanoke County water and sanitary sewer facilities with all necessary easements. Section 2, Valley Developers, accept the Deed conveying the serving the subdivision along The water and sewer facilities are installed, as shown on plans prepared by Buford T. Lumsden and Associates entitled Section 2, Kingston Court, dated 29 April 1987, which are on file in the County Engineering Department. The water and sanitary sewer facility construction meets the specifications and the plans approved by the County. FISCAL IMPACT: The value of the water and sanitary sewer construction is $32,000 and $24,000 respectively. RECOMMENDATION' ff recommends that the Board of Supervisors accept the with all Sta the subdivision along sanitary sewer facilities serving necessary easements, and authorize the County Administrator to execute a Deed for the transfer of these facilities. ~-3 SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED: Cliffor ig, P.E. Utility Director ~, C Y¢ Elmer C. Hodqe County Administrator ACTION VOTE Approved (x) Motion by: Harry C. NickensEddy No Yxs Abs Denied ( ) Johnson x Received ( ) McGraw _~ Referred -~ Nickens -~ to Robers cc: File Utilities Cliff Craig, Director, Phillip Henry, Director, Engineering svs.. • • ~--- ti ;' ~-3 - NORT9 s~ ~~ ~, F .s~~ a- L ~ _ ~. Vii. ~' `~ ~t a, •' ,,ba ~ •.~ -.. ~ .~ . Qi s ss ~Y 1 ~ . r ,~ ~ ~ • ~• I~ ~' COMMUNIT75ERVICBS Facilities Servingrgingston1Court,eSection 2 AND DBYBLOPMENT ~ , STATE CODE SECTIONS CORRECTED IN RESOLUTION ON 5/3/91 AT THE REGULAR MEETING OF AT THE ROANORE pCOUNTY ADMINISTRAOTION COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD 1990 CENTER ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 14, RESOLUTION 81490-8.C REQUESTING CHANGES IN SECONDARY SYSTEM DUE TO RELOCATION AND RECONSTRUCTION OF OLD MILL ROAD (ROUTE 752) BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1, That this matter came this day to be heard upon the proceedings herein, and upon the application of a portion of Old Mill Road (Route 752) which was relocated and reconstructed under VDOT Project 0752-080-221,M501,502 & B666; 2, That it appears to the Board of Supervisors that Secondary Route 752 from 0.25 miles west of Route 221 to 0.37 miles west of Route 221, for a distance of 0.12 miles has been altered; a new road has been constructed and approved by the State Transportation Commission, which new road serves the same citizens as the road so altered; and these changes are shown on the attached sketch titled "CHANGES IN SECONDARY SYSTEM DUE TO RELOCATION AND RECONSTRUCTION ON ROUTE 752, PROJECT 0752-080-221,M501,502 & B666, DATED AT RICHMOND, VIRGINIA, JUNE 12, 1990". 3. That the portions of Secondary Route 752, i.e., Sections 3 and 4 and connections thereto, i.e., Section 5, for a total distance of 0.14 miles be, and are hereby added to the Secondary System of State Highways pursuant to Section 33.1-229 of the Code of Virginia, as amended; 4, That sections of old locations of Route 752, i.e., Section 2 for a total distance of 0.04 miles be, and are hereby abandoned as a public road, pursuant to Section 33.1-151 of the Code of Virginia, as amended; 5, That the State Highway Commission be requested to take necessary action to discontinue the section of old location i.e., Section 1, for a total distance of 0.03 miles, as part of the Secondary System of State Highways as provided in Section 33.1- 150 of the Code of Virginia, as amended. On motion of Supervisor Nickens, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Brenda J. H ton, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File ineering George Simpson, Assistant Director Eng Arnold covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections, Fred C. Altizer, Jr., Resident Engineer, Virginia Department of Transportation py AT THE REGULAR MEETING OF AT THE RROANORE pCOUNTY ADMINISTRp,OTION COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD CENTER ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 14, 1990 RESOLUTION 81490-8.c REQUESTING CHANGES IN SECONDARY SYSTEM DUE TO RELOCATION AND RECONSTRUCTION OF OLD MILL ROAD (ROUTE 752) BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That this matter came this day to be heard upon the proceedings herein, and upon the application of a portion of Old Mill Road (Route 752) which was relocated and reconstructed under VDOT Project 0752-080-221,M501,502 & B666; 2. That it appears to the Board of Supervisors that Secondary Route 752 from 0.25 miles west of Route 221 to 0.37 miles west of Route 221, for a distance of 0.12 miles has been altered; a new road has been constructed and approved by the State Transportation Commission, which new road serves the same citizens as the road so altered; and these changes are shown on the attached sketch titled "CHANGES IN SECONDARY SYSTEM DUE TO RELOCATION AND RECONSTRUCTION ON ROUTE 752, PROJECT 0752-080-221,M501,502 & B666, DATED AT RICHMOND, VIRGINIA, JUNE 12, 1990". 3. That the portions of Secondary Route 752, i.e., Sections 3 and 4 and connections thereto, i.e., Section 5, for a total distance of 0.14 miles be, and are hereby added to the Secondary System of State Highways pursuant to Section 33.1-229 of the Code of Virginia, as amended; 4. That sections of old locations of Route 752, i.e., Section 2 for a total distance of 0.04 miles be, and are hereby abandoned as a public road, pursuant to Section 33.1-155 of the Code of Virginia, as amended; 5. That the State Highway Commission be requested to take necessary action to discontinue the section of old location i.e., Section 1, for a total distance of 0.03 miles, as part of the Secondary System of State Highways as provided in Section 33.1- 144 of the Code of Virginia, as amended. On motion of Supervisor Nickens, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Phillip Henry, Director, Engineering Arnold Covey, Director, Development & Inspections, Fred C. Altizer, Jr., Resident Engineer, Virginia Department of Transportation ACTION # ITEM NUMBER ~_~ AT A REGULAR MEETINGTOTHEHROANOKE OCOUNTYE'ADMINISTRATIONNOCENTER COUNTY. VIRGINIA HELD A MEETING DATE: August 14, 1990 Requesting Changes in Secondary System Due to SUBJECT_ Relocation and Reconstruction of Old Mill Road (Route 75 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Old Mill Road (Route 752) was reconstructed to eliminate substandard bridge over Bnia Department11ofonTransportation bnow completed and the g wishes to make these changes on the official Route Maps. FISCAL IMPACT- No county funds were involved in this change in the Secondary System. RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors approve the attached resolution to implement changes in the Secondary System due to reconstruction of Old Mill Road (Route 752). K-~/ SUBMITTED BY: ~~,,,~ Phillip T. Henry, P• Director of Engineering APPROVED: ~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ___ ---- -- ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs Approved ( ) Motion by: Eddy Denied ( ) Johnson Received ( ) McGraw Referred Nickens to Robers 2 ~ 1 / AT THE REGULAR MEETING OF TAT THEROANOKEPCOUNTYRADMINISTNRATION COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD CENTER ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 14, 1990 RESOLUTION REQUESTING CHANGES IN SECONDARY SYSTEM DUE TO RELOCATION AND RECONSTRUCTION OF OLD MILL ROAD (ROUTE 752) HE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1, That this matter came this day to be heard upon the proceedings herein, and upon the application of a portion of Old Mill Road (Route 752) which was relocated and reconstructed under VDOT Project 0752-080-221,M501,502 & B666; 2, That it appears to the Board of Supervisors that Secondary Route 752 from 0.25 miles west of Route 221 to 0.37 miles west of Route 221, for a distance of 0.12 miles has been altered; anew road has been constructed and approved by the State Transportation Commission, which new road serves the same citizens as the road so altered; and these changes are shown on the attached sketch titled "CHANGES IN SECONDARY SYSTEM DUE TO RELOCATION AND RECONSTRUCTION ON ROUTE 752, PROJECT 0752-080- 221,M501,502 & 8666, DATED AT RICHMOND, VIRGINIA, JUNE 12, 1990". 3, That the portions of Secondary Route 752, i.e., for a Section 5, Sections 3 and 4 and connections thereto, i.e., total distance of 0.14 miles be, and are hereby added to the Secondary System of State Highways pursuant to Section 33.1-229 of the Code of Virginia, as amended; 3 J-~- y 4, That sections of old locations of Route 752, i.e., Section 2 for a total distance of 0.04 miles be, and are hereby abandoned as a public road, pursuant to Section 33.1-155 of the Code of Virginia, as amended; 5, That the State Highway Commission be requested to take necessary action to discontinue the section of old location i.e., Section 1, for a total distance of 0.03 miles, as part of the Secondary System of State Highways as provided in Section 33.1- 144 of the Code of Virginia, as amended. 4 l ' `7 NORTH To U.S. Rte. 221 ~.. \~ Noli \ 176 berr \ ~. Roo. ~. Sect. 2 Sect. 5 Sect.4 To Rte. 764 ,~h" a ~~ ~o Sect.l \~ ./ Sect.3 ~~ o`a /~~ .~/~ -• -~00 ~. `~" LEGEND ~,.~ Section of neW location to be added to Seooo~IY ~~ ~ppppp~ Section of old location to be a ~~ .~ ~~ ~ ~~ .~ /~~ . ~`cA ~: Section of old location to be d~spOOtl°ued ~...... (~5_~2) ITY SERVICES ~~SCTION ONROUTES75T2~p ~ cT o 52COSO 22~ir, COMMON CONSTRII AND DEVELOPMENT ~-5o t (SoANO~ couNTY ) ACTION # A-81490-8.d ITEM NUMBER /'1 ""5 AT A REGULARA HELDNAT THEHROANOKED COUNTYEADMINISTRATION CENTER COUNTY, VIRGINI MEETING DATE: August 14, 1990 SU&7EC Acceptance of Water and Sanitary Sewer Facilities Serving "The Park" at Valleypointe Phase II, Building C COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Developers of Valleypointe, Lingerfelt Development Corporation, have requested that Roanoke County accept the Deed conveying the water and sanitary sewer facilities serving the subdivision along with all necessary easements. The water and sewer facilities are installed, as shown on plans prepared by Buford T. Lumsden and Associates entitled "The Park" at Valleypointe Phase II, Building C, dated 7 March 1989, which are on file in the County Engineering Department. The water and sanitary sewer facility construction meets the specifications and the plans approved by the County. FISCAL IMPACT' The value of the water and sanitary sewer construction is $12,000 and $10,000 respectively. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors accept the water and sanitary sewer facilities serving the subdivision along with all necessary easement the t ansfer rof these facilitie~inistrator to execute a Deed for SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED: ~ '~ ~` . Clifford ig, P.E. Utility Director Approved (x) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to _- 1 C-s Elmer C. od e County Administrator ACTION Motion by: Harry C. Nickens VOTE No Yes Abs Eddy x Johnson x McGraw x Nickens x Robers x cc: File Cliff Craig, Director, Utilities Phillip Henry, Director, Engineering k-5 ~. .. NORTE 4 COMMUNI?'ySERVICIsS Acceptance of Water and Sanitary Sever Facilities Serving "The Pars" at Valieypoinl AND DEVELOPMENT Ph a s e I I, B u i l d i n g C ACTION N0. A-81490-8.e ITEM NO. ~ - AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ~ETTNG DATE: August 14, 1990 8GF3NDA ITEM: Donation of water line easements across Lots 10 and 11, Section 8, La Bellevue to the County of Roanoke BOUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUNIIdARY OF INFORMATION: This consent agenda item involves the donation of the following water line easements, twenty (20") feet in width, to the County of Roanoke. a) Donation of a twenty (20') foot new water line easement from Paul T. Hatam and Julianne P. Hatam, (Deed Book 1289, page 1035) (Tax Map No. 39.02-3-17) as shown on a plat prepared by the Roanoke County Engineering Depart- ment dated 21 April 1988. b) Donation of a twenty (20') foot new water line easement from Roger Bryant, (Deed Book 1322, page 1441) (Tax Map No. 39.02-3-16) as shown on a plat prepared by the Roanoke County Engineering Department, dated 21 April 1988. The location and dimensions of these properties have been reviewed and approved by the County's engineering staff. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends acceptance of these properties. Respectfully submitted, Vicki L. Huf a Assistant Coun y Attorney ~~ Action Vote No Yes Abs x Approved (x) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to MOtlon by Harr C' Ni~kPnG Eddy Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers cc: File Cliff Craig, Director, Utilities Phillip Henry, Director, Engineering N£TE$ AI~U HOUNDS DESt3ili'T)ON SHO WN ON TNIS PLAT REPRESENT A COi~POSlTE Of DEED PUTS AJdD CAIpluTFall~pRJ~lAT10N Alm DO NOT REFLECT ANACCI/RATE 90UlVDAAY SURVEY. o- I ~~ `~ a SUMMIT RtpGE A=61.88~~ ~ EXISTING I IS' P.U•E. "1 r LOT II ~ LA BELLEVUE (P8.9 PG. 26Q AO P~ R = 241.21. A:95.1 ~ ~~ ~~ ab P' `9 . EXISTING 20' WATER LINE \ \ EASEMENT ,p "'~ ig ~' II \ ti - -- e ~~ ~ • S92°-46'-42"w ~ t60' I10' LOT 2 I lA BELLEVUE (P8.9 PG. 261) LOT 10 SECTION 8 ~ ; \ lA BELLEVUE ~ ~ t P8.9 PG. 260) .'~ ~ o` ~ ` i` f ` \ t NEw 20' ~ ~ WATER LINE \ ~ BASEMENT ~ o 0 Tax s~a~ No. 39.02 - 3 -17 /'~-~O LOT 9 LA BELLEVUE tP8.9 PG.2601 EXISTING . A.P.CO. TRANSMISSION LINE R/W " 60' SCALE : I s PLAT SHOWING NEW WATER LINE EASEMENT BEING CONVEYED TO ROANOKE COUNTY BY PAUL T. AND JULIANNE 1?. ~T~ Revised: 6-15-90 Prepore d 8y : Roaoo#e County Enq~neer~~q OepartmeM Date : 4 - 21- ca fMETFS A!~ 80UNDS DESCRIPTION SHOWN ON TMl.9 PLAT REPRESENT A Of OEEO~ PLATS, A1~D CALCULATED WfORAlA 110N AND DO NOT REFLECT AN A CCURA TE 60UADAAY SURVEY. /~'~ - to ~h J~ i _~/ - -- .. SUMMij EXISTING 15' P•U•E. - lOT 12 LA BELLEVUE (PB•9 PG.260) RIDGE ROAp X50 ~. /(~ / ` t"w A= sl.e8~ ~ / ~ Ra241.~ 40.33 _ 10' .' I I NEW 20~ ~ I WATERLINE LOT 10 EASEMENT I LA BELLEVUE 10' ; I (P8.9 PG. 260) ' _~,•~ W LOT 1 I ' - ~ ~°-,~ N ~ SECTION 8 ~ N = LA BELLEVUE ~I ~ o ~ ~(P8.9 PG•260) I~ Z ~ EXISTING A.P. Ca TRANSMISSION LINE R/W, ~44.u' 6- 21 w lOT 20 LA BELLEVUE l P8.9 PG. 261) TAx >~ ~, 39.02 - 3 - i C ~~ SCALE: I =60 PLAT SH041ING NEW WATER LINE EASEMENT BEING CONVEYED TO ROANOKE COUNTY BY ROGER BRYANT Revised = 6 -15-90 20' \ ~ \ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ \~ ~\ ~\ ~~ LOT 21 LA BELLEVUE (PB• 9 PG• 261) Precared Br : Roanoke County £nq~neer~nq OepartmeM yate:_ ~*-~~- o0 ACTION NO. A-81490-8.f ITEM NO. ~ 7 AT A REGULAR M HELD AT THE ROANOKE OCOUNTY ADMIN STRAT N CENTER COUNTY, VIRGINIA, FETING DAB: August 14, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: Donation of a drainage easement from Hugh H. Wells and Margaret H. Wells to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia COUNi"' snMTUTRTRA'~'OR' S COMMFN_T.~: BACKGROUND: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: This consent agenda item involves the donation of a variable width drainage easement in connection with the Chaparral Drive Project from Hugh H. Wells and Margaret H. Wells (Deed Book 1260, page 462) (Tax Map No. 87.09-3-7) to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as shown the Roanoke CountyNEngineering Easement" dated 16 May 1990 made by Department. The location and dimensions of this donated easement have been reviewed and approved by the County's engineering staff. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends acceptance of this drainage easement. Respectfully submitted, Vi ki L. Huf an Assistant County Attorney Action Vote No Yes Abs x Approved (x) Motion by Harrv C Nickens Johnson x Denied ( ) McGraw x Received ( ) Nickens x Referred Robers x to _- cc: File Utilities Cliff Craig, DiDire~tor, Engineering Phillip Henry, METES ANO 30UNOS DESCA ~R~TI~ ~ ~ ~T REFEECT AN ACCURATE 8OU DARY St1RVEY. PUTS, .~lJD CALCULATED INF bO A~9.~1 ~ 563 ~~ ~ \ ~O \ ~~ ` ~~~ EASEMENT NAGS \ \ \\ ~ t r' ~ ~ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ EXIST. D.E. \ \\ \ \ ~- \ \ EXIST 15' S.S. E. ~ \\\ \ ~ \ \ \\ \ ~~~ \ ~ \ \ ~~ ap ~ \ ~'~. HUGH H. R MARGARET H. `~\~ \\ \\ WELLS s~~ \ \\ '°o. ~\ \ \ \ ~ \ \\ ~\ \ ~ ~ \\ ~ 15 ~ \ \\\ . \\ ~ `,,8~ NEW ORA/NAGS , `~~ ~b. ~\ EASEMENT ~ ~ ~~ .x \ ~ ~\ . f to' ~ \ ~ ~ K 19.12'v \ 4.37' k \ rv,~r~w ~x' _ _ \ ~` ~ 31.38' • a~ \ \ ~ TAX MAP NO. 87.09 -3 -7 ~.. ~ . E. . A~ . CHAPARRAL OR/VE ~~ ~~ ~ ~'1 SCALE: r~=~~ PLAT SHOWING NEW DRAINAGE BASEl~Nf' BEING CONVEYED TO ROANOKE COUNTY BY HQGH H. 6 MARGARET H. WBLLS PREPARED BY: ROANOKE COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT DATE: 5 -16-90 A-81490-8.g ACTION NO. ITEM NO. ~ - 8 AT A MERGINI MEHELD AT THE ROANOKE OCOUNTY ADMIN STRA ION CENTER COUNTY, ~ j~F.TING DATE: August 14, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: Donation of drainage easements in connection with the Givens Avenue Drainage Project and the Alleghany Drive Project to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: This consent agenda item involves the donation of easements for drainagi tern a1 Districta of theoCounty of Roanoke ase followse Catawba Mag a) Donation of a drainage easement, twenty feet (20') in width, from the Industrial Development Authority of Roanoke County, Virginia, (Deed Book 985, page 25) (Tax Map No. 55.10-4-44), and Medeco Security Locks, Incorpo- rated, Lessee, (Deed Book 985, page 33; Deed Book 1179, page 817; and Deed Book 1180, page 110), in relation to the Givens Avenue Drainage Project, shown and designated as "PROPOSED 20' DRAINAGE EASEMENT" on a plat prepared by the Roanoke County Engineering Department, dated January 11, 1990. b) Donation of a drainage easement, fifteen feet (15') in width, from McVitty Homes of Roanoke Valley, Inc., (Deed Book 1052, page 243, and Deed Book 1097, page 220) (Tax Map No. 55.09-1-16), in relation to the Alleghany Drive Project of the Virginia Department of Transportation, shown and designated as "PROPOSED 15' DRAINAGE EASEMENT" upon a plat prepared by T. P. Parker & Son, dated January 30, 1990. The location and dimensions of these properties have been reviewed and approved by the County's engineering staff. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends acceptance of these properties. ~-S Respectfully submitted, V ki H f an Assistant Co my Attorney Action Vote No Yes Abs Eddy x Approved (X) Motion by Harry C. Nickens ~ Johnson Denied ( ) McGraw " Received ( ) Nickens Referred Robers to cc: File Utilities Cliff Craig, Director, Phillip Henry, Director, Engineering . ~cc.w r.uc .~ VICINITY M1~.P i,1o .~ \~~ ev.I3TU- IA~E-~ / s_ '`f"B / / / 153 W'W III // Ill ~ 11 ~PRDFt~~E..D IS' EA~.~E.1v1ENT r ~15T~NG pw~-G. L 'r. ~ ~ S 5la° 30~ W 38.00' -~j~ III III a °! ~g iii ~~~~~P t ~~,2' Tt~ U.S. KTE.'4ro0 ~ ~ ~ ~ -~ ~c''cz-'~ .,,~•ys•00~'~' N ~° 37' 43" 1N 194.93 ~R~~/~. E.X15T11~lG E.P ~.~- ~~~~-IAN ~L EASEJdIENf PLAT FOR RICHFIEI..D RETiR~MENT COMMUNITY S!•i0-WIt~IG PRCO 15' ORAINI~~E EASEM~7' FPM DRNE ~ EXISTING ICE SITUATE VIRGi?J IA ~' ~. ROIJTE.1a~2 RiOo?JOKE COt_11~t7Y, 55.0'9.1-1(0.l VIRGINIA 'AX NO. ~.s.ww-~5 cA~c. RAWN Mw ~ CK'D. J VJ ~• ernertcen bM.eprw.t ee «~wwW BY: T. P. PARKER & SON ENGINEERS ~ SURVEYORS , ITD. tALEM VIRGINIA SCALE: ~'= -fit OATE: JAN. ~, t9 w.o. 89.112 D_ METES AND 80UNDS DESCRIPTION SHOWN ON THIS PLAT REPRESENT A COMPOSITE OF DEEDS PLATS, AND CALCULATED INFORMATION AND DO NOT REFLECT AN ACCURATE 80UNDARY SURVEY. I 173' ~ -GIVENS AVE. ~ 8 N 26• S9' W 122.00' N 69' 21' 3~T' ~ 88.44' ' T 24.4x' A 35.7' R 25.00' C 34.97' C>, S63.2e~[ N 31.43' W 18220 PROPOSED 20' DRAINAGE EASEMENT MEOECO SECRUITY LOCKS INC. 0 N 1a •~ 0 i; Q A = Q ~ •~ .J Z J Q .' Q 14• S4' T 249.22' A 495.22' R 1950.00' S 63.34 W 78.34' C 494.43' C8 STO•SI'W - ROUTE I 1 / 460 S T8. 08' W 242.17' TAX MAP ND. 55.10 - 4 - 44 SCALE: i " ' 200' I,~ . ~ === PL`AT' SHOWING NEW PROPOSED DRAINAGE EASEMENT BEING CONVEYED TO ROANOKE COUNTY BY . . MEDECO SECURITY LOCKS,.INCORPORATED _~ 1 NT2'09'E 648.59' w I ac W ~ g } ~ J ~ 3 a I PREPARED 8Y: ROANOKE COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT DATE: ~ - I ~ - 90 ~N26.59~W 43.64' I N 63.00' E 13.00' ACTION NO. ITEM NO. A-81490-8.h ~- AT A REGULAR MEETING T THE ROANOKE OCOUNTY ADMINISTRAT ON OCENTER COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD A MEETING DATE: August 14, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: Donation of drainage easements through Lots 10, 11, and 13, Block 2, North Hills Subdivision, Hollins Magisterial District, to the County of Roanoke COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: This consent following easements, Roanoke for drainage along Greenway Drive Benda item involves the fifteen (15') feet in width, purposes, in relation to th in the Hollins Magisterial donation of the to the County of e drainage project District. a) Donation of a fifteen (15') foot drainage easement from Kyle M. Munsey and Violet C. Munsey, (Deed Book 594, page 288) (Tax Map No. 27.18-4-10) as shown on a plat prepared by the Roanoke County Engineering Department, dated May 23, 1990. b) Donation of a fifteen (15') foot drainage easement from Charles S. Wilkerson and Nancy D. Wilkerson, (Deed Book Tax Map No. 27.18-4-9) as shown on a plat 638, page 51) prepared by the Roanoke County Engineering Department, dated May 23, 1990. c) Donation of a fifteen (15') drainage easement from Milton L. Sprinkle and Betty J. Sprinkle, (Deed Book 894, page 392 (Tax Map No. 27.18-4-12) as shown on a plat prepared by the Roanoke County Engineering Department, dated May 22, 1990. The location and y~dithesCounty's engineering staff have been reviewed and approved y STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends acceptance of these properties. Respectfully submitted, V ck a L. Hu an Assistant County Attorney ~' Action Approved (x) Motion by Denied Received ( ) Ref erred to __- cc: File Utilities Cliff Craig, Director, Phillip Henry, Director, Engineering Vote No Yes Abs Eddy u Johnson Y McGraw X Nickens Y Robers Y ~IEi ES AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTION ~ AND DO NOT REFLECT AN ACCURA~~ UNDARY SURVEY PLATS. AND CALCULATED IIVFORMA ~- GREENWAY OR. S 44° 0 5~ E 15~ 105.00 ~ 1 o a~ ~ D. E. TO BE 1 ~ DEDICATED TO ROANOKE COUNTY-~ ~ 0 `~' 1 1 i KYLE M.' 6i` VIOLET C MUNSEY W O ltJ ~ O O ~ o O O ~ d' N N ~' Z 2 105.00 N 44 0 W5 SCALE: I ~. - 30' Ti4X MAP NO. 27.18 - 4 - 9 PLAT SHOWING NEW DRAINAGE EASEMENT BEING CONVEYED TO ROANORE COUNTY BY KYLE M. ~ VIOLET C. MUNSEY DATE: 5 -23-90 PREPARED BY: ROANOKE COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT METES AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTI ~~ AND DO NOT REFLECT AN OCURA~ BOUNDARY SURVEY. p~,A'T~ AND CALCULATED INFOR 11 \ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 w ~1 . o 1 'N 1 ~ , S 44°05~ E 110 00 GREENWA Y OR. CHARLES S. A NANCY D. WlL KERSON p ~ \5 O ~ /5' D. E. TO BE N ~ DED/GATED TO Z ` \ RDANOKE COUNTY ~s °ae Fj A ~\ `~\ TAX MAP NO. 27.ia-4-io ~. C+Ci' N 44 0 W5 ~° w o ~ o ~ O ~ N z ,\ \\ SCALE: ~" = ~~ PLAT SHOWING NEW DRAINAGE EASII~IENT BEING CONVEYED TO ROANORE COUNTY BY CHARLES ~ NANCY D. WILKERSON PREPARED BY: ROANOKE COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTIblENT DATE: 5 -23-90 METES AND BOUNDS DESCRIPT 1ON SN4 ~ DO NOt REFT LECT AN ACCt1RA~~ AY SURI/EY. PLATS„ AND CALCULATED INFORMATION PLAT SHOWING N'L'W DRAINAGE EASII~iENT BEING CONVEYED TO ROANOKE COUNTY BY MILTON L . ~ BETTY J . SPRINIQ.E DATE: 5 -22-9Q- PREPARED BY: ROANOKE COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 27.18 - 4 - 12 S~:ALC: ~ + a~ TAX MAP NO. ACTION NO. A-81490-8.i ITEM NO . ~"~ "' ~ AT A REGULAR M HELD AT THE ROANOKE OCOUNTY ADMIONISTRAT ON CENTER COUNTY, VIRGINIA, MEETING DATE: August 14, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: Donation of sanitary sewer and drainage easements in connection with the Grandin Road Extension Project to the County of Roanoke COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: This consent agenda item involves the donation of the following easements relation to the Grandin RoadsExtensioneProject drainage purposes in in the Cave Spring Magisterial District. a) Donation of the following easements f ao a Da8v73d RTaX°Map and Linda A. Jones, (Deed Book 1277, P g re ared(by the No. 76.05-1-17) as shown on a plat p p Roanoke County Engineering Department, dated 15 June 1990. 1) and desi nated )as ~ NEW 15'tSrS . ESMT.'e on the aboven g referenced plat. ii) A fifteen (15') foot drainage easement shown and designated as "NEW D.E." on the above-referenced plat. b) Donation of the following easements from W P ge 132) Haynes and Penelope P. Haynes, (Deed Book 980, (Tax Manoke.County Engineering Departmentla dated 15eJune the Roa 1990. i) A twenty-five (25' ) foot drainage and sanitary sewer easement shown and designated as "25' NEW DRAINAGE & S.S. ESMT." on the above-referenced plat. ii) A twenty (20') foot sanitary sewer easement shown and designated as "20' NEW S . S . ESMT. " on the above- referenced plat. iii) A twenty (20') foot drainage easement shown and designated as "2 0' NEW DRAINAGE ESMT . " on the above- ~'S'- l ~ referenced plat. iv) A ten (10') foot sanitary sewer easement shown and designated as "10' PRIVATE S.S. LATERAL ESMT." on the above-referenced plat. c) Donation of a variable width drainage easement f aoe 603) A. Lyons and Claudia W. Lyons, (Deed Book 1313, p g (Tax Map ke.Count 5 Engineering Departmentla dated 13eJune the Roano Y 1990. d) Donation of a fifteen (15') foot wide drainage and sanitary sewer easement from William Stephen Kelly and Cynthia J. Kelly, (Deed Book 1306, page 846) (Tax Map No. 76.05-1-n6ineerino Department t dateda 15 June 1990oanoke County E g g e) Donation of a twenty-five (25') foot wide drainage and sanitary sewer easement from Donald E'Tax MapaNo.D76~05y E. Shell, (Deed Book 973, page 451) 1-14) as shown on a plat prepared by the Roanoke County Engineering Department, dated 15 June 1990. f) Donation of a twenty-five (25') foot wide drainage and sanitary sewer easement from Engle W. Kesler and Susan H. Kesler, (Deed Book 1242, page 874) (Tax Map No. 76.05- 1-15) as shown on a plat prepared by the Roanoke County Engineering Department, dated 15 June 1990. The locati roved bd1thesCounty's engineering rstaff have been reviewed and app Y STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends acceptance of these properties. Respectfully submitted, 1 ~~ Vi ki L. Huf n Assistant Coun A torney Action Approved (x) Motion by Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to cc: File 'ff Crai Director, Utilities Vote No Yes Abs Eddy x Johnson x McGraw x Nickens x Robers x Cli g. Phillip Henry, Director, Engineering ML?ES AND B ALCULATED INFORMATION AND DO NOT REFLECT AN ACCURATE BO NU DARY SURVEY. PLATS, AND C ~-~- /~3 EXISTING D.E/ TO REMAIN NEW D. E. • S.71°24' E. S.73°06' E. 35.02 55.00 _ -- ~ EXISTING FO~S.3. I M ~ TO BE ABANDONED ~- ---- 1 ~ I ...- --- .C.~. -~ . __ -_ y - _ I '~- tD ~ EXISTING 5~ D.E_ ~ I TO 8E ABANDONED ~' I W M ~ ~ ~ I Z DAV/D R. Q L/NDA A. JONES 90.03 N. 74° 27' W. GRAND/N ROAD EXTENS/ON TAX MAP NO. 76.05 - I - 17 T --~IO~S.S.E. TO REMAIN in v NSW /5' S. S. ESMT. 0 N 3 ir) 0 cD cn• SCALE: ~ "= 30' PLAT SHOWING NEW SANITARY SEWER AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT BEING CONVEYED TO ROANOKE COUNTY BY DAVID R. & LINDA A. JONES PREPARED BY: ROANOKE COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT DATE: 6 -15 - 90 MEr°ES AND BOUNDS DE ~ ~ ~TION AIVD ~ NO REFLECT AN ACCU OU DARY SURVEY. PLATS, AND CALCULATE ~- /~ .~~ S.82°57' E ,6g8 47.74 ~ 10~ DRAIN ESMT. EXIST 055 _ - 00 ~ - - N12 a2' ~ ~ - 10~ TEL. 8~ ELE C. E. . TO BE ABANDONED ~-,~ M \3 ~ ~ _ ~ -- ~.. ~ EXIST. 10~ S, S. ESMT. ~~`-- ~ _ - _ ~ =!lA,H. TO BE ABANDONED . .~~,~ - ~ !rte '~~ ~ PR 1(AZ NEW 2O - ~ , E. EX1SZ . 1 S.S. ESMT. ' ~~i _ 22~ ,-~ ~~~/ ___- - ~ " DRALEIA~F ESMT. TO BE A8~0.NDON~D ,~ 55-, ___ - 25'NEW ~+/, " ' ~ ~--~ --~ .r.. ~ ORA/NAGS A w " 3 SS. ESMT. t~ = , I ~/ 10'PRIVATE S.S. _ ~ ~ ~` o ' ~ / ~ LATERAL ESMT. ~ N 9 ~ -' Z , ~ EXIST. 5~ PRIVATE a. - ~ DRAINAGE ESMT. TO 8E ABANDONED V1 W/L L /AM V. B PENELOPE P. 1 ~ HA YNES ~ CURVE DATA: ~ ~ = 9' 44~ 26" ~ z0 ~ NEW TAN = 42.60 ~ ~ ORA/NAGS ESMT R A D. = 500.00 ARC.=b5.00 gO.26~04~~W = N CHD ~ _-- - - - - - - ----- - - '-- - EXIST.IO~STORM '- . . 84 ~ DRAIN ESMT, TO BE ABANDONED See Curve Data GRANO/N ROAD EX TENS/ON TAX MAP N0.7s.o5-I-13 SCALE: I"= 30' PLAT SHOWING NEW SANITARY SEWER AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT BEING CONVEYED TO ROANOKE COUNTY BY WILLIAM V. & PENELOPE P. HAYNES PREPARED BY: ROANOKE COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT DATE: 6 - 15 -90 M ~ BOUNDS DESCRlPTiON SHOWN ON THIS PLAT REPRESENT A COMPOSITE OF DEEDS, PLATS, AND CALCULATED INFORMATION AND DO NOT REFLECT AN ACCURATE BOUNDARY SURVEY. CURVE DATA o = 20°- 45~- 55" TAN. = 91.61' RAD. = 500.00 ARC. = 181.21 CHD. =S.84°18~W. ~so.22 10' EXIST 15' PUBIC UTIC. ESMT. cA _ _------ ----- c ___ _---- ~ SEXIST. m - ~ ~~r ~ ' \ ~ D ~ ~ c ~ ~ ~ ~ ,} \ 1 ~ - DALE A. Q CL AUD/A N! ~ 1 ~` LYONS ~~ 1 ~ \ 2 ~ ~ ~ N .' ~ \ ~ ° EXIST. 10' STORM ~ ~ DRAIN ESMT ~ la~ NEW D. E. ~~ I$ ~XIST.,10' PRIVATE DRAINAGE ESMT. ~ _ _ _ ~ N. 4°41~ E. _ (11.77' ±6p TAX MAP NO. 76.05-I-12 fS'- ~® 20' DRAIN ESMT,• SCALE: I"~ 30' PLAT SHOWING NEW DRAINAGE EASEMENT BEING CONVEYED TO ROANOKE BY DALE A. & CLAUDIA W. LYONS N.10°3~'W N .a 34.23 o c~s_ ~_ ~o a Z d Z O 0 ~'C `\x /~ ~° \ F NEW D. E. `t ti Z y Z PREPARED BY: ROANOKE COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT DA7E: 6 -13- 9 0 pUNOS DESCR1PTlOld SHOWN ON THIS PLAT REPRESENT A C'O(6fPOSITE OF DEED3~ l~E~TES ~ B ALaJLATED (NFOR141ATJON AND DO NOT REFLECT AN ACCURATE BOUNDARY SURVEY. F;.ATS, A~ C /`? _ /L? ih M /yEW /5' DRAINAGE Q S.S. ESMT. -- ~_` 'lam D.E. TO BE ABANDONEQ I ' 1 ~' D.E .70 REMAIN -~--' ___ _ I- o EXIST. 10' S.S. E. TO REMAIN ~~' I 2 5' ! a~ d in N 5'D.E.TO BE ABANDONED i ~ ~ W/LL/AM STEPHEN ~ ~ ,a. CYNTHIA KELLY I ui 1 M M I ~ ~ i o °c0 I ~ I ~ N ~ I I 15'S.D.E.TO BE ABANDONED) 11.68 ARC. 78.32 N.71° 30~ W N .74°27 ~W R = 2 400.00 GRANDIN ROAD EXTENSJON SCALE: I'~ 30' Tex MAP NO. 76.05-I- 16 PLAT SHOWING NEW SANITARY SEWER AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT BEING CONVEYED TO ROANOKE COUNTY BY WILLIAM STEPHEN & CYNTHIA KELLY PREPARED BY: ROANOKE COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTME~+I r DATE: 6-15-yam D 80UNDS DESCRIPTION SHOWN ON THIS PLAT REPRESENT A COMPOSITE OF DEEDS, D CALCULATED INFORMATION AND DD NOT REFLECT AN ACCt1RATE BOUNDARY SURVE . A~lE7'~S AN PLATS, AN EXIS. 10~ D.E. TO 8E ABANDONED 5,71° 24~ E. 5,g2°5~` 63.97 32.48 __-__---- - ~~ NEW 25' DRAIN EXIST. l0~ s.s. Q $, $. ESMT. ESMT. 70 BE m ABANDONED ~ - --- _ - ---~- _ si - _ - _ _ - -'" )O~ PRIVATE DRAINAGE ' " ~ ESMT. TO BE ABANDONED . w ~... ~"'~ ~~ 3 i0 N ' ~ ~ e ~y M ° ~ M ~ i a_ DONALD E. ~ DOROTHY E. ~_ SHELL `~ CURVE ~B~ CURVE ~A" ~~ p = O° O8~ 46~~ p. 5'16 -16 TAN•=3.05 TAN. = 23.02 RAD.= 2.400.00 RAD. =500.00 EXIST. STORI~L DRAIN ESMT. ARC.= 6.11 ARC.= 46.00 I0.8E. q~ANDONED CHD.= N.70°22~ W. CHD. = N. 72.55 W _ _ _ _ .- -- - _ - - 6.11 45.98 - - '- 12 10~ 37.76 N.70° 17 W. ~B' 6RANOlN ROAD EXTENSION TqX MAP NO. 76.05-1-t4 SCALE: ~~~= 30' PLAT SHOWING NEW SANITARY SEWER AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT BEING CONVEYED TO ROANOKE COUNTY BY DONALD E. & DOROTHY E. SHELL DATE: 6 -15 -90 PREPARED BY: AOANOKE COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT METES AND 90UNDS DESCR1pT10N SNO ~~ ~ NOT REFLEX AN ~RAMTE 6 pUlypO RY SURVEY. ,P1.A,'~ ~!ND CALCULATED INFORMATION ~! -.' /f~ 10~ D.E.TO BE ABANDONED ~ 24~~ NEW 25' ORA /N M v EXISTING ~ S.S. ESMT. 10' S.S. ESMT. TO BE ABANDONED ___ _ ~~-=---- - - _ - -- -'.- . = ~~ ~r~ 10~ PRIVATE DRAINAGE ESMT. TO BE AB.AKOS1t~tED ~~ ~~ ~r ~- ENGL E W. e SUSAN H. M KESL ER ~_ of - v - 3 CURVE DATA D = 2° 08' - 59 tat ~ TAN. = 45.03 ~ o RAD. =2400.00 i ~ ~ ARC.=90.04 ~ vj CHD = N.71°30'5C1'W _ - 90.04 2 EXIST. STORM GRAIN ESMT. T4 -8E .;_ ..._ - . -~/ ABANDON1s>Z -'~-- - i N -____- See Curve Data - . GRANDIN ROAD EXTENSION TAX MAP NO. 76.0 5 - I - 15 SCALE: I'_ 30' PLAT SHOWING NEW SANITARY SEWER AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT BEING CONVEYED TO ROANOKE COUNTY BY ENGLE W. & SUSAN H. RESLER DATE: 6 -15 -90 °- _ ___....,~., ov anen-oKE COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT . AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE p,-81490-8 • J ACTION NO. , / ITEM NO. ~~ OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE' August 14, 1990 nation of a drainage Basemen anf to the Board of AGENDA ITEM' Do Morgan and Michele Maureen or Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND' S~p,Ry OF INFORMATION' twenty ent agenda item involves the donation of Commander This cons foot drainage easement in Mo 9 a and Michele Maure~he Board (20) to Drive Project from Lawrence RTax Map No. 86.12-4-6) page 0006) ( Virginia, as shown °n re tired (Deed Book 1305, ril 1990 p P of Supervisors of Roanoke County, "New 20' Drainage EasementD'epartment, Ap showing ineering by the Roanoke County Eng cation and dimensions of this donated easement ave ~s engineering staff. The to roved by the County been reviewed and app STAFF RECOMMENDATION: a easement. Staff recommends acceptance of this drainag Respectfully submitted, Action Vick a L. Huf an Assistant Coun y Attorney Nickens Garrett x Motion by Harr C• Johnson Approved ( ) McGraw Denied ( ) Nickens Received ( ) Robers Ref erred to .~--- Vote No Yes Abs x x x x x cc: File Utilities Cliff Craig, Director, Engineering Phillip Henry, Director, NM ON TIitS PLAT REPAESENr A CODE ~ DEED8r PTE'S AID BOU'ND.4 DE~~ ~ A jp pp NOT REFLECT AN AOCtIAATE GARY SURVEY. ~~~ AND CAL~'!j /t,ATEO EXI>sT1NG 0.1. OW IroA ' i ~ ! TO BE ABANDONED ID. Y. 1291 PG~SO i `- Ph: _~~• 04' E -196.99' ~ Ob iron --- ~ M .,..,,~. ~.... ~~ ( O EW 20' 0. E. ~ ~ M N i vs ;~ lo' Pu.E - I N 1D ~ 3 L Af~YRENAE R. 8 p//CHEL E A/. :N A/OR6AN ~ a ~ I > M L-OT 3 ~ °C SECT/ON t ~` ~ i N/CNOLS ESTATES 1 1 0~ ZOa W• ~ 21't.11 5 Opp 2 1-0o Pk~ Sit CU^.VE DATA p : Q3° 04' 26~~ RADIUS = >ZS0.00' ARC. = T8.4b' CHORD • 5.46'02'37" E. DIST. ^ T8.08' f"~ ° ,~'~ W Z 0 v Z 3 1 roo P to Sst SCALE: ~" = 40' rerBtAPNO. 86I~-4-6 - PLAT SHOpING NSW DRAINAGB EASBKBNT BBING CONVBYBD TO gOApOKB COUNTY BY LAWBSNCB R. 6 KICABL6 K. KORGAN enc~~ ~n BY: ROAMOKE COU~lTY E~NEERI~IQ DEPARTMENT DATE: a-17-so illllllllllllllllllillllllillllllllllllillllllllllll~llltllili111~~~i~~~ ~~~ WIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIiIIi _ - - RE UEST = ANCE Q = = APPEAR _ _ _ _ _ ~ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ~ _ AGENDA ITEM NO. ~ ,~.~ ~.. _ - ~ - SUBJECT ~ -~-`~' 0 S " e isors to~y~~ -_ like the Chairman o the Boar n the above matter I would =_ o nine me during the public ea LED TO THE PODIUM, rec g WHEN CAL - so that I may comment. 1VIE AND ADDRESS FORTH _ I WILL GIVE MY N - O ABIDE BY THE GUIDELIN = I AGREE T RECORD. _ LISTED BELOW• • iven between three to five minutes to comment _ • Each speaker will be g dividual or representative. The chairmn an issue, whether speaking as an in _ time limitbased on the number of # ~ma,ont~ of-tghe-Board to ._ decide the and will enforce the rule unless instructed by = do otherwise.. Dint of view only. Ques- - resentation of their p __ • Speakers will be limited to a p the Chairman. = bons of clarification may be entertained by n a reco nized ust be directed to the Board. Debate betwee g c • All comments m s Baker and audience members is not allowe . p and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. __ • Both speakers to leave any written statements and/or comments _ • Speakers are requested with the clerk. - RPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED _ TH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION • INDIVIDUALS PU -_ GROUP SHALL FILE ~ OWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT FROM THE GROUP AL = THEM. LY AND GIVE TO DEPUTY CL '_ PLEASE PRINT LEGI AME ~~ h n ~ _ ~ fq ~.~ • - N ~~ ~ ~ c ADDRESS ~~ i ""' PHONE ~ ~ ~ 5 _ - IIIIIIIIIIIIIIilllllllllillllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll IIIIIIIiillllllllllllllllllllllilllllllllllllllllllll mllllll n~-/ COUNTY OF ROANORE, VIRGINIA CAPITAL FUND UNAPPROPRIATED BAI+~CE 1990 $ 9,608 Unaudited Beginning Balance at July 1- $ 9,608 Balance as of August 14, 1990 Submitted by ,carte ~ ' ~~ Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance COUNTY OF ROANORE, VIRGIgI~,p~NCS / ''s GENERAL FUND ~p~ppROPRIATED Amount Unaudited Balance at July 1, 1990 $2,653,756 Balance as of August 14, 1990 $2.653.756 Submitted by ~~,ovne~ ~~ ~~~~ Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance ~'/~ -° COpNTY OF ROANORE, VIRGINIA RESERVE FOR BOARD CONTINGENCY $ 50,000 Beginning Balance at July 1, 1990 $ 50,000 Balance as of August 14, 1990 Submitted by Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance ACTION ~ ITEM NUMBER M ETING OF THE BOARD OF STyEp,VDMINISTRATION CENTER AT A REGULAR ME COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROA1`IOKE CO MEETING DATE: August 14, 1990 AGENDA ITEM' Accounts Paid - June 1990 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR S COMMENTS: SUNIMARy OF INFORMATION' payments to Vendors: 6/08/90 $ 424,767.20 Payroll: 6/22/90 416 372.40 p, detailed listing of the payments to the Board of Supervisors. $2,096,051.35 841 139.60 $2,937.190.95 is on file with the Clerk APPROVED: SUBMITTED BY: ~L l ~nir,4, ~ ~`-~-~~ Elmer C • Hodge Diane D. Hyatt County Administrator Director of Finance _____________________________ ______---- VOTE -----'------------------ ACTION No Yes Abs Approved ( ) Motion by: Eddy _ - Johnson - -- Denied ( ) McGraw - - Received ( ) Nickens - - - Referred ( ) Robers - - - To ACTION ~ ITEM NUMBER ~ .~.~ EETING OF THE BOARD OF STyE~MINIST~T ON C NTER AT A REGULAR M COUNTY. VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROA1`TOKE COUN MEETING DATE' August 14, 1990 GENDA ITEM: Report on the New Financial System A COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND: an using a new financial the County of Roanoke beg was the culmination of On June 4- stem, ONLINE FAMIS- ment , installation system. This new sY analysis, develop several years of ev h of these stages were vital to the successful and conversion. Eac ro ect. completion of the overall p 7 rate an its search for a new system that would integ The County beg for a reliable accounting system with the need e its resources efficiently. This the functional needs manag immediate response in for assisting the County rovided more required a system that p tracking the collection o f andvguidelines set forth reporting and in the directs those resources in keep g in the budget • departments was f orn-ed p, team of top management from several Cackage• The team included software p Management Roanoke Country Schools, to evaluate and fr ~ t a County Administrator for representatives the Assistant artment, with the Information Systems, et and the Finance Dep Diane Hyatt, Management Services, Budg ro ect controlled by onsibility for the p 7 overall resp Finance Director. criteria and requirements of e osals (RFP) listing Request f or Prop re issued. After the initt ~ uia meet the acr~terted the County we inia. Selec search was narrowed to two firms t a of the vendors had instal A tions within Virg am rated the fter several months of study which Each the to team members made site visits- each company.hted for the degree also included demonstrations oint system weig an d aon° each of the criteria. The team eventually packages using of importance place 1 -- e marketed and supported by the selected ONLINE FANII5, a packag accounting firm of KPMG Peat Marwick. form of project a two tiered To oversee the installati A Steering Committee was formed at the ro ect and to settle management was established. cross departmental lines. i her level to give overaa~iserthatom Y the P ~ testing and h g any questions that would onsible for the installa The project team The project team was resp s ecifications. of Finance. assuring the system met County Assistant Director was headed by Paul Grice, tion of the new system began in November 1989. Installa SUMMARY OF INFORMATION' esi ned around the concept of tables that are Each section within each department ONLINE FAMIS is d g The index code is required for each accessed via an index code. with a "sub- is assigned an index code. This index code along Within the transaction within FANIIS. ~~ code forms the account code within FAMI feces allow object d information that asso 1 theseh p code with Department, and Program. Al For example, index code lect~bedde a Fund, Proj e user to accumulate information at various leve o - d of Supervisors is assoect within the th the index code for the Boa ervisors, and 4) the e General Fund, 2) an overall administrative Pr as th the department of Board of Sup section General Fund, 3) Government and Administ ectl can further be program of General In addition the subobj reported in the CAFR. using the index code for the ort data For example hone, an expenditure would be used to rep ect for telep The user could tal et. Board and the subobj recorded against the Board's telephone artments to obtain a ect to report acros iven fun . the subobj hone costs in a g for all telep saying that the index In other words the system can be described by WHO~~ is associated with the transaction and code tells the user ~~WIiAT~~ of the transaction. the subobject is the to inquire on their departments will be given access enditures through The using This will enable them to tracks~e~, the data in the budget codes. artments to the system and because FAMIS isThiso should enable dep system will be m ets morelefficiently. manage their budg uests the Finance office can srintedre n the orts and have those reports p Within certain limitations, working to standardize some for management rep For example- summary Finance office. Finance is Curren artments. ets. reports that may be used across dep artment budg information regarding line items within dep orting. Finance is still rove year-end rep Until we ONLINE FAMlthehlearn ng curve and will be stem ° Pe t Marwick will moving uP eable about the sY are sufficient knowledg 2 ~~~ 1 support through their consultants and the Fp,NIIS continue to supp Y visible hotline service. months with no the system in six tribute to the installed the departments is a team. To have of the installation disruption of service t° all members all departments dedication and effort of cooperation between been tremendous h this cooperation the County There has and schools. Throug the foreseeable future or within the county has a system that should meet its needs and beyond. ~ ~ ~~ Elmer C. Hodge Paul E. G ice County Administrator _-_-__- Assist nt Director ______________________ of F'nance -------------------- ____ _________ VOTE ACTION No Yes Abs Motion bY~ Eddy - - Approved ( ) Johnson - - Denied ( ) McGraw - - - Received ( ) Nickens - - - Ref erred ( ) Robers - - To 3 ACTION NO. M -- ITEM NUMBER OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE T THE ROp,NOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRp,TION CENTE AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD A August 14, 1990 MEETING DATE: ency Plan for possible state Report on Conting AGENDA ITEM: reduction of local funding COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: S~p,Ry OF INFORMATION' staff at of ossible reductions of potently di mpact which In anticipation p Officers. Roanoke County has reviewed the areand Constitu and at this time, schools, Social Services includes VML and VACO have been contacted, tate agencies, •Ons know the full extent of what the impact S anizatl none of these org 000 to might be. of $200, the vicinity Staff has estimated the redu 1 st of potential cost red 1990,nwhen re ared a ervisors after August 16, $800,000 and have p p ested budget cuts. be brought to the Board of Sup the Governor is expected to announce his Bugg ve loss and believe ate an excessl state time, we do not antiaC~ made by any reduction or impact At this absorb the imp ear. The maj that we for the remainder of this fiscal Y ets . funding ear's budget and future budg will be felt in next y a list of proposed ust 28th Board of Supervisors meeting, At the Aug ou ht to the Board based on the results of the reductions arnouncemen t on August 16~ 1990. Governor's ~ c7~/ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator "'" ---------------- VOTE ------------------------ ACTION No Yes Abs Motion by: Eddy Approved ( ) Johnson - - Denied ( ) McGraw - -- Received ( ) Nickens - Ref erred ( j Robers - To ACTION # ITEM NUMBER ~~- NG OF THE BOARD OF SUPE~MINISTRATIONNCENTER AT A REGULAR MEETI COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNT MEETING DATE' August 14, 1990 Report on Street Light Replacement Program AGENDA ITEM' COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND approved the Board of ervisors to h June 1988, the Vapor SStreet Lighting of 7x000 On 14' Mercury existing changing 420h ressure conversion of The project included Sodium. hts to 9,500 lumen hig P to Pressure or street lig vapor street lights lumen mercury vaP conversion of 21,000 lumen mercury cost of the sodium, and 155 The light budget. ressure sodium. the street the 22,000 lumen high P funded within otiated for was 538,694.47 and was 1990. The conversion from hese funds resulted fromthTU July seductions n rovide T 1, 1987, was accomplished to P and period of Julyto high pressure sodium lighting intensity, mercury vapor a higher level of of lighting, hting. uniformity charges for this new lig reduced monthly SUMMARY OF INFORMATION and in July of 1988, ro ram starteppCO also has changed The street light conversion p 9 500 lume 1, 1990. In addition, vapor street lights to 9, ApCO was completed July mercury County/ all of the 3500 lumen terms of the existing all street h ressure sodium under the 9,500 lumen Therefore, as of July 1, 1990, hig P ht Contract. minimum of Street Lig County is at a hting is high pressure lighting in Roanoke all street lig intensity. In addition, in color and contrast. sodium, which provides for uniformity rocess street rrent evaluation P d at road the cu Under previous programs and is generally loca e lighting in Roanoke County concerns. intersections, and/or areas of safety ~-~ ents or very few citizen comet coon rogram. The most ineering Department receiou p directed toward The En9 during this Chang kiting complaints dealt with increased 1i9 concerns by ressed able to resolve these concern exp Staff was the residencApCO. working with street lights has been FISCAL IMPACT' . with the conversion °Light Budget, All cost associated id from the 1988-89 and 1989-90 Street pa APPROVED BY: SUBMITTED BY ~ ~% ~~ U ~ti Elmer C. odge County Administrator PhieCiorTofHEngineerEng--------------------------- VOTE bs r t ----- No Ye A Di-------------- ACTION s Motion bY~ Eddy __ Approved ( ) Johnson _ 'ed ( ~ aw Denl McGr Received ( ) Nickens --- Referred Robers -- To _--- l~~ OF SUPERVISORS OF RO~CENTER MEETING OF THE BOARD AT A REGULAR D AT THE ROANORE COUNT1990MINISTRATIO COUNTY, VIRGINIAS HON TUESDAY, AUGUST 14, 490-9 CERTIFYING EXE OF VIRGINIANG WAS RESOLUTICONFORMITY WITH THE CODE HELD IN County, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke WHEREAS, this date pursuant convened an executive meeting °n with the Virginia has and in accordance recorded vote an affirmative and to of Information Act; of The Virginia Freedom of Virginia provisions 344.1 of the Code Section 2.1- Roanoke WHEREAS, Supervisors of the Board of meeting was conducted in requires a certification by Virginia, that such executive County, with Virginia law. the Board of conformity gESOLVED, that NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT Virginia, hereby certifies that, to Supervisors of Roanoke County, the best of each members knowledge• exempted from Onl public business matters lawfully ussed in the 1. Y disc inia law were irements by V irg open meeting requ lies, and which this certification resolution appdentified executive meeting were i 2, Only such public business matters as discussed ening the executive meeting were heard, cony of Roanoke County, in the motion of Supervisors or considered by the Board Robers, and carried by the Virginia. On motion of Supe~isor following recorded vote: ervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Robers AYE5: Sup NAYS: None ABSENT: Supe~isor Nickens A Cppy TESTE: a' ~ 7"~ Mary H• Allen, Clerk ervisors County Board of Sup Roanoke cc: File Session File Executive Pp A Npl.~ o`` ~~ Z _z J ~ rEaPS 18 ~°~ sa SFSQUICEN?ENN`P~' ,1 BcnuN~ulBcGinning COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE Mr. John BS°. del Drive 5003 Shady 24018 Roanoke, VA August 17, 1990 AU ~M ~' '' 1979 leas BOARD OF SUPERVISORS RICHARD W • RpBERS. CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERCHAIRMAN STEVEN A. MCGRAW. VICE- CgTAWgA MAGISTLEE B! EDDY WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERI JOHNSON BOB L. HOLLINS MAGIST CAN CKENS HARRY VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT Dear Mr. Brownlee: The Roanoke County Board their sincere appreciat Building Code Board of personally thank you for to express ervisors have askeservice to the of Sup our previous me to ion for Y and Appeals. Allow Adjustments ed on this Board. the time you sere community and willing their too scarce. 'tizens so responsive a d ttheir t me are indeed all Cl themselves to g ive of Sincerely, '~~~~~ ~. Mary H• Allen, Clerk ervisors Roanoke County Board of Sup MHA/b7 h EnclosureJames T. Nininger~ cc: Mr. ~nunt~ of iRnMnal~r Chief Building Official . ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24016-0798 (703) 772-2004 p.p. BOX 29800 PpANO,I.~ o`` ~ ' ~' 9 Z _~ J ~ ~a ;ESOS as SFSQUICEN7ENN`P~ :1 BrnutirulBrkinnin~; COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE C~vitn~~ of ~,~n~tnok~ August 15, 1990 Altizer, Jr. Mr. Fred C. Resident Engineer ortation Virginia Department of Transp P. O. Bp}{ 3071 24153 Salem, Virginia AIL AM ''~~'I 1979 19a9 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS RICHARD W • BORERS. CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERCF.{AIRMAN STEVEN A. MCGRAW. VICE- CATAWBA MAGISTLEE B! EDDY WINDSOR HILLS MBOB L.IJOHNSON HOLLINS MAGIST Cp'N CKENS HARRY VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT Altizer: c requesting changes Dear Mr• 81490-B• of Old a copy of Resolution No• and reconstructithe Board Attached is S stem due to relocation Was adopted by in Secondary Y This resolution August 14, 1990. Route 752)• on Tuesday, Mill Rervisors at their meeting of Sup 'on please do not hesitate to contact If you need further informati me. Sincerely, rn~- Mary H. Allen, Clerk ervisors Roanoke County Board of Sup bah Engineering Attachment Henry, Director, pc; Phillip 0 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24018-0796 (703) 772-2004 p.0. BOX 2980 ,r 1 ~ ~ t ~ Z ' ; ~ P G1 ~ v r z ~ 18 I~'~iQi 88 SFSOIIIf:FNTENN`P r rr.,,~ ,l~~~drr;,_„„~~~~g COUNTY !11)MINISTRATOR ELMER C 1 Ir'I )c;E All AMfHICA Cltt ~, N (~ ' I I ~~~~~ ~~ ~~~~ `ice ~~ 1979 1989 August 15, 1990 12av. Samuel W. Crews coopers Cove Baptist Church C/O Commissioner of Revenue Roanoke, VA 24018 Dear Reverend Crews: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS RICHARD W. ROBERS, CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERAL DISTRICT STEVEN A. MCGRAW. VICE-CHAIRMAN CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT LEE B. EDDY WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT On behalf of the Board of Supervisors, I would like to take this opportunity to let you know of our appreciation for your attending the meeting on Tuesday, August 14, 1990, to offer the invocation. We feel it is most important to ask God's blessing on these meetings so that all is done according to His will and for the good of all citizens. 'T'hank you for sharing your time with us. Since ely R. W. Robers, Chairman Roanoke County Board of Supervisors RWR/bj h P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24018-0798 (703) 772-2004