Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
8/24/1990 - Regular
~N ~ a ~ ~ 9 7 2 - ~~~YYif~ t~f ~i1~t ~~~ ~ n ~ 18 ~~ 88 tEraNICEMTEKN~'` e~.~„N,e.,~.~,.R ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ACTION AGENDA AUGUST 28, 1990 Alt-AMERICA Ci1Y i-~~ .~ 3 ~~9~8~9 Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Meeting. Regular meetings are held on the second Tuesday and the fourth Tuesday at .3:00 p.m. Public hearings are held at 7:00 p.m on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.) 1. Roll Call. 2. Invocation: The Reverend Alan Rowbotham Unity of Roanoke Valley Church 3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag. B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS SAM ADDED APPROVAL OF ~ ~ PERMIT - NORTHSIDE ATHI.ETIC BOOSTERS TO CONSENT AGENDA RWR ANNOUNCED 890-6 PUBLIC HEARING HAD BEEN CONTINUED TO 9/25/90 i C. PROCIAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS, AND AWARDS 1. Recognition of Brenda Holton for receiving certification as Professional Secretary. RWR PRESENTED CERTIFICATE TO BH 2. Resolution of Appreciation to local Military Personnel defending our Country in the Middle East R-82890-1 LBE MOTION TO ADOPT - URC CAPT.DAVID S, VIRGINIA ARMY NATIONAL GUARD RECEIVED RESO D. NEW BUSINESS 1. Appropriation of funds for the Roanoke County Code Supplement. A-82890-2 LBE MOTION TO APPROVE MODIFIED BY HCN TO INCLUDE FUTURE SUPPLEMENTS IN BUDGET WHEN NECESSARY - URC 2. Appropriation to the School Federal Program Funds for the 2 + 2 Program. A-82890-3 BLJ MOTION TO APPROVE APPROPRIATION - URC RWR ASKED THAT LETTER OF APPRECIATION BE SENT TO COOPER INDUSTRIES 3. Claim of Clark and Emilie Owen a A-82890-4 HCN TO DENY CIAIM AND DIRECT STAFF TO ADDRESS EROSION PROBLEMS - URC 4. Resolution approving capital expenditure 6y the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission. R-82890-5 BIB MOTION TO ADOPT RESO URC 5. Resolution appointing a Fire Marshal for Roanoke County R-82890-6 HCN TO ADOPT RESO APPOINTING TOMMY FUQUA URC E. REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS NONE F. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS PUBLIC HEARING SET DURING WORK SESSION FOR 9/25 TO HEAR CITIZEN CO1VIlViENT ON COUNTY PARTICIPATION IN HOTEL ROANOKE-CONFERENCE CENTER G. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING FOR REZONING ORDINANCE -CONSENT AGENDA BLJ MOTION TO APPROVE FIRST READING AND SET PUBLIC F~ARINGS FOR 9/25/90 URC 3 1. An ordinance rezoning 7.35 acres from RE Residential to M-2 Manufacturing to construct a contractor office and equipment storage located on Catawba Valley Drive in the Catawba Magisterial District upon the request of Lacy G. Alexander. 2. An ordinance approving a Use Not Provided For permit for construction of a 50 to 60 foot microwave tower to be located at the back entrance of Dominion Bankshares Bankcard Operations Center at 5673 Airport Road located in the Hollins Magisterial District upon the request of Dominion Bankshares Corporation. H. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES I. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance authorizing Deed of Exchange and Partial Release of easement for water facilities at Tanglewood Mall. 0-82890-7 HCN MOTION TO ADOPT ORD URC J. REPORTS AND INQi7IItIES OF BOARD MEMBERS SUPERVISOR EDDY: (1) ASKED THAT RESO OF SUPPORT FOR A PORTION OF LOTTERY MONIES SHOULD BE RETURNED TO LOCALITIES BE PLACED ON 9/12/AGENDA. (2) SUGGESTED THAT SIGN LETTER TO CARE RESPONDING TO THEIR QUESTIONS. (3) REGARDING PMM'S MEMO TO EMPLOYEES CONCERNING A POLICY STATEMENT ON CONSOLIDATION: SUGGESTED THAT QUESTIONS BE REFERRED TO PMM. HCN STATED THAT POLICY STATEMENTS SHOULD BE APPROVED BY 4 BOARD. ASKED PMM BRING BACK REPORT AND REQUEST FOR POLICY STATEMENT AT 9/12/90 MEETING. (4) STII..L CONCERNED ABOUT LATE FILING FEE FOR PERSONAL PROPERTY TAX, APPEALED TO BOARD TO DISCUSS THE ISSUE AGAIN (~ EXPRESSED CONCERN ABOUT RESULTS OF SDN MARI~T RESEARCH REPORT. SUGGESTING ASIIONNG ROANOKE VALLEY BUSINESS COUNCIL TO RECONSIDER CONCLUSIONS OF REPORT. FOLLOWING DISCUSSION, BOARD CONSENSUS FOR ECH AND STAFF TO GO FORWARD WITH ANALYZING REPORT AND REPORT BACK. (~ EXPRESSED SUPPORT FOR MAILING BROCHURE TO ALL VOTERS. SUPERVISOR MCGRAW: (1) ASKED ECH WHEN REPORT ON SDN MARI~T RESEARCH WOULD BE READY. ECH WILL TRY TO HAVE READY BY 9/12/90. (2) ALSO ASKED FOR COSTS TO MAIL BROCHURE TO CITIZENS REGARDING CONSOLIDATION. SUPERVISOR ROBERS: (1) ANNOUNCED AIRPORT COMII~IISSION WII.,L HOLD A RETREAT ON SEPT 5 AND 6 AND WELCOMED CONIlI~NTS AND IDEAS FROM THE PUBLIC REGARDING THE AIRPORT. SUGGESTIONS FROM BOARD MEMBERS TO CONSIDER CHANGING THE MAKEUP OF THE COMIVIISSION. (2) THE SMART HIGHWAY CONFERENCE WII.L BE WILL BE HELD ON 9/14/90 AT VPI&SU. K. APPOINTMENTS 1. Board of Zoning Appeals HCN ANNOUNCED THAT M. E. I~~IAXEY IS CO G TO SERVE UNTIL SOMEONE IS APPOINTED TO REPLACE HIM. 2. Grievance Panel 3. Industrial Development Authority s BOARD CONSENSUS THAT ALL APPOINTMENTS TO BOARDS, COI~BVIITTEES, AND COMII~IISSIONS BE COUNTY RESIDENTS. PMM WILL DRAFT POLICY FOR BOARD ADOPTION. 4. Landfill Citizens Advisory Committee RWR NOMINATED KIM ALTEC TO SERVE 5. League of Older Americans Advisory Council L. CONSENT AGENDA , ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROU'I'IlVE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY. R-82890-8 BLJ TO APPROVE WITH ADDITION OF #6 URC 1. Approval of Raffle Permit - Botetourt Jaycees A-82890-8.a 2. Confirmation of Committee Appointments to the Community Corrections Resources Board and the Industrial Development Authority. A-82890-8.b 3. Resolution requesting acceptance of Kings Chase Drive, Fox Croft Circle and Huntmaster Circle into the VDOT Secondary System. R-82890-8.c 6 4. Acceptance of water and sanitary sewer facilities serving Kings Chase -Section 1. A-82890-8.d 5. Donation of a drainage easement, Lot 73, Section 1, Kings Chase. A-82890-8.e 6. Approval of Raffle Permit - Northside Athletic Booster Club A-82890-8.f M. CITIZENS' COMII~NTS AND COIVBVIiJNICATIONS ALL CITIZENS SPOKE REGARDING COUNTY SUPPORT OF CONFERENCE CENTER: 1. Robert Myers, 6533 Laban Road to speak concerning Roanoke County's involvement with the conference center. ASKED THAT CONSTRUCTION OF THE CONFERENCE CENTER USE OPEN COMPETITIVE BID PROCESS AND PRESENTED A SUGGESTED LIST THAT BIDDERS WOULD COMPLY WITH 2. PATRICK COSMATO, 5219 BURNT QUARTER, VIlVTON SPOKE CONCERNING CONFERENCE CENTER: IF ROANOKE COUNTY PARTICIPATES TIDY SHOULD DEMAND FAIR REPRESENTATION ON COINIlVIIITEE AND FAIR REVENUE RETURN. 3. DON TERP, 5140 APPLE TREE DRIVE, IN FAVOR OF CONFERENCE CENTER BUT NEED MARI~T STUDY FOR BEST LOCATION, ETC. PROBLEM IS AIR TRANSPORTATION INTO ROANOKE. 4. DAVID COUREY, 3419 ASHIVIEADE, NEED PUBLIC HEARINGS BEFORE MONEY IS SPENT. 5. CHARLES IANDIS, 5268 GLENVAR HIGHS BLVD. FELT MAJORITY OF COUNTY CITIZENS OPPOSED TO COUNTY PARTICIPATION. 6. WAGNER, 5502 AYSHIRE DR IN SUPPORT OF CONFERENCE CENTER BUT SUGGESTED THAT VPI ALUNINI SHOULD PkOVIDE PRIVATE FUNDING AND DOES NOT SUPPORT TAXPAYERS FUNDS. 7. WINTON SHELOR, 4348 SHELOR FARM LANE, OPPOSED TO FUNDING OF THE CONFERENCE CENTER USE FUNDS FOR PARKS, POLICE DEPARTMENT, SENIOR CITIZENS. ETC. 8. RODNEY SMITH, 5007 BRADSHAW ROAD, OPPOSED TO FUNDING. NEED TO HELP SENIOR CITIZENS. 9. ED KOHINKE, 6913 BRADSHAW ROAD, SUPPORTS HOLDING PUBLIC HEARING AND SUPPORTS CONCEPT BUT CONCERNED ABOUT COUNTY FINANCING. N. REPORTS BI.~ MOTION TO RECEIVE AND FILE - UW 1. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance 2. General Fund Unappropriated Balance 3. Board Contingency Fund 4. Accounts Paid -July 1990 O. WORK SESSION s 1. State Budget Shortfall PRESENTED BY ECH BI~j - (1) ASK STATE TO EXTEND DEADLINE ON RKE.CO~BOT.CO INDUSTRIAL ACCESS ROAD. (2) WON'T SUPPORT POSTPONEMENT OF DRAINAGE PROGRAM. LBE - WH.L NOT COMMIT TO FUTURE BUDGETS. CONTINUED FOLLOWING PUBLIC HEARINGS P. EXECUTIVE SESSION pursuant to the Code of Virginia Section 2.1-344 (a) (5) TO DISCUSS A PROSPECTIVE BUSINESS OR INDUSTRY WHERE NO PREVIOUS ANNOUNCEMENT OF BUSINESS HAS BEEN MADE. HCN MOTION AT 5:20 P.M. - UW Q. CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE SESSION A-82890-9 HCN MOTION AT 535 P.M. AYES-HCN,RWR, LBE ABSENT - BIB, SAM EVENING SESSION AT 7:10 P.M. R PUBLIC H1ARINGS AND FIRST READING OF 9 ORDINANCES ' 890-1 Ordinance requesting vacation of a 15 foot drainage easement located on the west property line, Lot 11, Block 3, Penn Forest Subdivision located in the Cave Spring Magisterial District. RWR MOTION TO APPROVE 1ST READING - URC 2ND - 9/12/90 890-2 Ordinance requesting vacation of a 20 foot drainage easement shown on the resubdivision of Tract 3, Southwest Industrial Park, located in the Cave Spring Magisterial District. HCN MOTION TO APPROVE 1ST READING - URC 2ND - 9/12/90 S. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 890-3 An Ordinance requesting vacation of a 50 foot right-of- way referred to as "Goff Road" recorded in Plat Book 3, Page 59 and located in the Catawba Magisterial District. 0-82890-10 SAM MOTION TO APPROVE ORD URC 890-4 An ordinance rezoning two parcels containing a total of approximately 1.78 acres from R-1 to B-1 for office uses, located on the west side of Starkey Road north of its intersection with Buck Mountain Road in the Cave io Spring Magisterial District, upon the request of Thomas Scarce. 0-82890-11 RWR TO AFI'ROVE ORD URC 890-5 An ordinance modifying the proffered conditions on a 24.94 acre tract to increase the size (number of bedrooms) of a portion of the 264 apartment units previously approved; located on the west side of Colonial Avenue, near the intersection of Ogden Road in the Cave Spring Magisterial District, upon the request of Occidental Development Ltd. 0-82890-12 4 CITIZENS SPOKE IN OPPOSITION DR WILLIS P. IANIER, 4743 WOODLEY DR MARK SEILLR, 3471 OLD TOWNE ROAD DOUG DOUGHTY, 3534 WEDGEWOOD DAVID COUREY, 3419 ASIIlVIEADE RWR MOTION TO DENY REZONING URC 890-6 An ordinance modifying an existing Planned Unit Development plan on a 2 acre tract generally located within the Stonehenge PUD, south of Kelly Lane in the Cave Spring Magisterial District. This request is to permit the construction of a 16 unit, single building condominium, upon the request of J. Allison Associates. CONTINUED TO 9/25/90 AT PETITIONER'S REQUEST 890-7 An ordinance modifying the proffered conditions on ii approximately .25 acres to allow the use of the property for stake-out restaurant and food service, with the existing office and video store, located at 5314 Fallowater Drive in the Cave Spring Magisterial District, upon the request of John Lee Davenport. 0-82890-13 RWR MOTION TO APPROVE AYES-SAM,TiL,~,HCN,RWR NAYS-LBE ' 890-8 An ordinance rezoning approximately .028 acres from B- 2 to M-1 to expand an existing grocery to include the sale of tires and related services, located at the southern intersection of State Route 904 (Starkey Road) and 632 (Crescent Blvd.), in the Cave Spring Magisterial District, upon the request of Norman T. Wright. 0-82890-14 RWR MOTION TO APPROVE ORD URC T. CITIZENS COIVIlVIENTS AND CO1~'IlVIUNICATIONS 1. Richard Cox, 5714 Capito Street, Pres. North Roanoke Rec Club opposed to user fees for parks and recreation. (1) Asked for reconsideration of the fee, (2) if fee stands need to inform public and find method of collection. 2. Mike Walthall, 5118 Wipledale Avenue, opposed to the parks and recreation user fees. SAM MOTION TO RECONSIDER ACTION TAKEN ADOPTING USER FEE ORD. ON 8/14/90 12 AYES-LBE,SAM,BI~,RWR NAYS-HCN HCN MOTION TO REPEAL ORD. 81490-6 AND ALL USER FEES BE REVERTED BACK TO WHAT TIDY WERE ON JUNE 30, 1990, AND THAT $160,000 BE ALLOCATED TO THE PARKS AND RECREATION BUDGET FROM THE UNAPPROPRIATED BAIANCE. URC PMM TO PREPARE ORDINANCE TO RESCIND FOR 9/12/90 MEETING RECESS: 9:05 P.M. - 9:15 P.M. 3. Charles Lavinder, 5448 Canyon Road, opposed to county funding of the Conference Center ' WORK SESSION ON STATE BUDGET SHORTFALL (CONTINUED CONFERENCE CENTER/HOTEL ROANOKE HCN MOTION TO SET PUBLIC HEARING FOR CITIZEN COM114ENT ON 9/25/90 AT 7:00 PM. URC VA. TECH AND ROANOKE CITY TO BE REQUESTED TO MAKE PRESENTATION AT THAT TIlViE. LEGAL NOTICE TO INCLUDE THAT INFORMATION ON PROJECT WILL BE AVAIIABLE AT LIBRARY AND CLERK'S OFFICE. EXPLORE PROJECT PRESENTATION AT 3:00 P.M. 9/25/90 HCN - SAME INFORMATION SHOULD BE AVAIIABLE ON PROJECT AS CONFERENCE CENTER/HOTEL ' U. ADJOtifItNMENT BLJ MOTION TO ADJOURN AT 10:00 P.M. URC 13 14 ~ ~ N ,~ F a ~ ~ 9 .~ 18 (~.~ 88 +E~0111CENTENN\~'\' ~ Bt~~~ifulBt~new~eg ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ~u• cm C~nixnf~ of ~uttnvk.e ' ' ' r ~~9'8'9 AGENDA AUGUST 28, 1990 Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Meeting. Regular meetings are held on the second Tuesday and the fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public hearings are held at 7:00 p.m on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.) 1. Roll Call. 2. Invocation: The Reverend Alan Rawbotham Unity of Roanoke Valley Church ~~ Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag. B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS C. PROCIAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOG1~iITIONS, AND AWARDS i D. NEW BUSINESS 1. Appropriation of funds for the Roanoke County Code Supplement. 2. Appropriation to the School Federal Program Funds for the 2 + 2 Program. 3. Claim of Clark and Emilie Owen 4. Resolution approving capital expenditure by the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission. 5. Resolution appointing a •Fire Marshal for Roanoke County E. REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS F. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS G. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING FOR REZONING ORDINANCE -CONSENT AGENDA 1. An ordinance rezoning 'x.35 acres from RE Residential to M-2 Manufacturing to construct a contractor office and equipment storage located on Catawba Valley Drive in the Catawba Magisterial District upon the request of Lacy G. Alexander. 2. An ordinance approving a Use Not Provided For permit a for construction of a 50 to 60 foot microwave tower to be located at the back entrance of Dominion Bankshares Bankcard Operations Center at 5673 Airport Road located in the Hollins Magisterial District upon the request of Dominion Bankshares Corporation. H. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES I. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance authorizing Deed of Exchange and Partial Release of easement for water facilities at Tanglewood Mall. J. REPORTS AND INQUIItIES OF BOARD MEMBERS K. APPOINTMENTS 1. Board of Zoning Appeals 2. Grievance Panel 3. Industrial Development Authority 4. Landfill Citizens Advisory Committee 5. League of Older Americans Advisory Council 3 L. CONSENT AGENDA ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY TIC BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY. 1. Approval of Raffle Permit - Botetourt Jaycees 2. Confirmation of Committee Appointments to the Community Corrections Resources Board and the Industrial Development Authority. 3. Resolution requesting acceptance of Kings Chase Drive, Fox Croft Circle and Huntmaster Circle into the VDOT Secondary System. 4. Acceptance of water and sanitary sewer facilities serving Kings Chase -Section 1. 5. Donation of a drainage easement, Lot 73, Section 1, Kings Chase. M. CITIZENS' COMII~NTS AND COMMUNICATIONS 1. Don Fitzgerald to speak concerning Roanoke County's irnolvement with the conference center. N. REPORTS 1. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance 4 2. General Fund Unappropriated Balance 3. Board Contingency Fund 4. Accounts Paid -July 1990 O. WORK SESSION 1. State Budget Shortfall P. EXECUTIVE SESSION pursuant to the Code of Virginia Section 2.1-344 (a) Q. CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE SESSION EVENING SESSION R PUBLIC HEARINGS AND FIItST READING OF ORDINANCES 890-1 Ordinance requesting vacation of a 15 foot drainage easement located on the west property line, Lot 11, Block 3, Penn Forest Subdivision located in the Cave Spring Magisterial District. 890-2 Ordinance requesting vacation of a 20 foot drainage easement shown on the resubdivision of Tract 3, Southwest Industrial Park, located in the Cave Spring Magisterial District. s S. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND S~COND READING OF ORDINANCES 890-3 An Ordinance requesti g vacation of a 50 foot right-of- way referred to as "Go Road" recorded in Plat Book 3, Page 59 and located in the Catawba Magisterial District. 890-4 An ordinance rezoning o parcels containing a total of approximately 1.78 acr s from R-1 to B-1 for office uses, located on the west sid of Starkey Road north of its intersection with Buck ountain Road in the Cave Spring Magisterial Dis rict, upon the request of Thomas' Scarce. 890-5 An ordinance modifyin the proffered conditions on a 24.94 acre tract to incr ase the size (number of bedrooms) of a portion of the 264 apartment units previously approved; to ated on the west side of Colonial Avenue, near the inters ction of Ogden Road in the Cave Spring Magisterial Dis rict, upon the request of Occidental Developmen Ltd. 890-6 An ordinance modifyin an existing Planned Unit Development plan on a 2 acre tract generally located within the Stonehenge UD, south of Kelly Lane in the Cave Spring Magisteria District. This request is to permit the construction of a 16 unit, single building condominium, upon the request of J. Allison Associates. 890-7 An ordinance modifyin the proffered conditions on approximately .25 acres to allow the use of the property for atake-out restaura t and food service, with the existing office and vide store, located at 5314 Fallowater Drive in the Cave Spring Magisterial District, upon the 6 request of John Lee Davenport. 890-8 An ordinance rezoning approximately .028 ages from B- 2 to M-1 to expand an existing grocery to include the sale of tires and related services, located at the southern intersection of State Route 904 (Starkey Road) and 632 (Crescent Blvd.), in the have Spring Magisterial District, upon the request of Norman T. Wright. T. CITIZENS COMII~NTS AND COINIlVIUNICATIONS U. ADJOiJRNMENT i ~ ~~'1 ^~ ~-- -` AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 28, 1990 RESOLUTION 82890-1 OF APPRECIATION TO LOCAL MILITARY PERSONNEL DEFENDING OUR COUNTRY IN THE MIDDLE EAST WHEREAS, many residents of the Roanoke Valley are currently serving in the armed forces, or are members of reserve units of the armed forces or the National Guard; and WHEREAS, due to the current situation in the Middle East, many of these men and women are being sent to that part of the world, or put on alert that they may be called to action; and WHEREAS, the contributions of these citizens will be for the safety, health and well-being of all Americans. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors does hereby extend its deep appreciation and commendation to these men and women as they travel overseas on behalf of the United States; and FURTHER, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors does especially appreciate and commend those County employees who have already been or may soon be called to action; and FURTHER, BE IT RESOLVED, that copies of this resolution be forwarded to the reserve units of the armed forces and the National Guard. On motion of Supervisor Eddy to adopt resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Vic,:-~-%.; .~d - ~~.~ Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Resolutions of Appreciation File Air Force Reserve Army Reserve Marine Corps Reserve National Guard Virginia ~° .G..~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, August 28, 1990 RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION TO LOCAL MILITARY PERSONNEL DEFENDING OUR COUNTRY IN THE MIDDLE EAST WHEREAS, many residents of the Roanoke Valley are currently serving in the armed forces, or are members of reserve units of the armed forces or the National Guard; and WHEREAS, due to the current situation in the Middle East, many of these men and women are being sent to that part of the world, or put on alert that they may be called to action; and WHEREAS, the contributions of these citizens will be for the safety, health and well-being of all Americans. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors does hereby extend its deep appreciation and commendation to these men and women as they travel overseas on behalf of the United States; and FURTHER, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors does especially appreciate and commend those County employees who have already been or may soon be called to action; and FURTHER, BE IT RESOLVED, that copies of this resolution be forwarded to the reserve units of the armed forces and the ACTION NO. A-82890-2 ITEM NO. ~ - AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: August 28, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: Appropriation of Funds for Supplement No. 1 to the Roanoke County Code COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: EXECUTIVE SUNIlKARY Request for an appropriation of funds in the amount of $9,845.00 from the unappropriated balance to prepare Supplement No. 1 to the Roanoke County Code. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Roanoke County Code was last recodified in June of 1985 by Municipal Code Corporation in accordance with the award of a bid pursuant to the procurement laws. The estimated cost for preparing 100 complete, up-to-date replacement copies is estimated to be $9,845.00. This price is based upon a rate of $20.00 per page (450 pages) for the amendments and $6.50 per page (130 pages) for the unchanged materials. The time required for completion will be three to four months. An initial payment of $1,500.00 is required with the balance upon delivery. FISCAL IMPACTS' An appropriation of $9,845.00 from the Board Contingency Fund is required to accomplish this project. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Board appropriate ,the sum of $9,845.00 from the Board Contingency Fund to fund the recodifica- tion of Supplement No. 1 of the Roanoke County Code by Municipal Code Corporation. Respectfully submitted, . ~L Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney ~. - ~- ~~ Action Vote No Yes Abs Approved (x) Motion by Lee B. Eddy to Eddy x Denied ( ) approve modified by Harry C. Johnson x Received ( ) Nickens to include future McGraw x Referred supplements in budget when Nickens x to necessary Robers x cc: File Paul Mahoney, County Attorney Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance Reta Busher, Director, Management & Budget ACTION # A-82890-3 ITEM NUMBER ~ "' MEETING DATE: August 28, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: Appropriation to the Federal Programs Fund for 1990-91 for the 2 + 2 Program COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~~ BACKGROUND: The Roanoke County School Board has received a $10,000,00 grant from Cooper Industries for the 2 + 2 Program in Automated Manufacturing Technology for 1990-91, Cooperatively, area school divisions, community college, and industry have developed a curriculum which is industry driven, and students are now being recruited for entry into the program, Both industry and education are benefiting from this partnership, The Cooper Industries grant will be used in 1990-91 to continue active recruitment of qualified applicants and to expand curriculum development into other areas of automated manufacturing. Mr. Garland Kidd, director of vocational and adult education for Roanoke County Schools, will be present to answer any questions related to the appropriation request, FISCAL IMPACT: Revenue received from Cooper Industries will offset expenditures. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends appropriation of $10,000.00 to the 1990-91 Federal Programs Fund. C1/~ v Garland Kid Director Elmer C. Hodge Vocational Adult Education County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs Approved (x ) Motion by: Bob L. Johnson Eddy x Denied ( ) to approve appropriation _ Johnson x Received ( ) _ McGraw x Referred ( ) Nickens x To Robers x cc: File Garland J. Kidd, Director, Vocational & Adult Education Bayes Wilson, Superintendent, Roanoke County Schools Ruth Wade, Clerk, Roanoke County School Board Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance Reta Busher, Director, Management & Budget -~ - 2 FROM THE MINUTES OF THE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD OF ROANOKE COUNTY MEETING IN REGULAR SESSION AT 7 P.M. ON AUGUST 9, 1990 IN THE BOARD ROOM OF THE SCHOOL ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, SALEM, VIRGINIA. RESOLUTION REQUESTING AN APPROPRIATION BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS TO THE FEDERAL PROGRAMS FUND FOR THE 2 + 2 PROGRAM IN AUTOMATED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY. WHEREAS, the County School Board of Roanoke County has been awarded a $10,000.00 grant from Cooper Industries for the 2 + 2 program in Automated Manufacturing Technology for 1990-91, and WHEREAS, benefits of the initial phase of the 2 + 2 program are evident in the cooperative efforts of area school systems and industry in developing a curriculum for training at the high school level which will better supply the work place, and the funding from Cooper Industries will assist in the continuation of active student recruitment to ensure that qualified applicants enter the program and in the expansion of curriculum development into other areas of automated manufacturing; NOW, BE IT RESOLVED that the County School Board of Roanoke County, on motion of Charlsie S. Pafford and duly seconded, requests an appropriation of $10,000 to the 1990-91 federal programs fund for the 2 + 2 program. Adopted on the following recorded vote: AYES: Barbara B. Chewning, Maurice L. Mitchell, Charlsie S. Pafford, Frank E. Thomas NAYS: None ABSENT: Paul G. Black TESTE: .. FROM THE MINUTES OF THE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD OF ROANOKE COUNTY MEETING IN REGULAR SESSION AT 7 P.M. ON AUGUST 9, 1990 IN THE BOARD ROOM OF THE SCHOOL ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, SALEM, VIRGINIA. RESOLUTION REQUESTING AN APPROPRIATION BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS TO THE FEDERAL PROGRAMS FUND FOR THE 2 + 2 PROGRAM IN AUTOMATED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY. WHEREAS, the County School Board of Roanoke County has been awarded a $10,000.00 grant from Cooper Industries for the 2 + 2 program in Automated Manufacturing Technology for 1990-91, and WHEREAS, benefits of the initial phase of the 2 + 2 program are evident in the cooperative efforts of area school systems and industry in developing a curriculum for training at the high school level which will better supply the work place, and the funding from Cooper Industries will assist in the continuation of active student recruitment to ensure that qualified applicants enter the program and in the expansion of curriculum development into other areas of automated manufacturing; NOW, BE IT RESOLVED that the County School Board of Roanoke County, on motion of Charlsie S, Pafford and duly seconded, requests an appropriation of $10,000 to the 1990-91 federal programs fund for the 2 + 2 program. Adopted on the following recorded vote: AYES: Barbara B. Chewning, Maurice L. Mitchell, Charlsie S. Pafford, Frank E. Thomas NAYS: None ABSENT: Paul G. Black TESTE: / i' •' / AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ITEM NO. ~ - •~ MEETING DATE: August 28, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: Claim of Clark and Emilie Owen COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: p~~n~ ~i~ y EXECUTIVE SUNIlKARY Mr. and Mrs. Owen have filed a claim in the amount of $10,000.00 with the Board of Supervisors as the result of certain construction undertaken by the developers of Henry Farms Road. This claim is in accordance with Section 15.1-550 through -554 of the State Code. BACKGROUND• This is a dispute between Clark and Emilie Owen and the developers of Henry Acres, a subdivision in Roanoke County being developed by Walter L. and Virginia B. Henry, and specifically concerns the construction of the road serving this subdivision, Henry Farms Road. Attached you will find a copy of Maxwell, Esq., attorney for the Owens', basis for this claim, as well as some dispute. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: DENIED ACTION NO. A-82890-4 a letter from William C. describing in detail the of the background of this It is the County's position that the approval of the sub- division plat does not give rise to any liability of the County to the Owens' for the allegations contained in the claim letter. Further any claims for damages as a result of the construction activities or any claims for damages as a result of an alleged trespass are the sole responsibility of the contractor or the developer. There are no allegations of any damages arising from any acts of the County. The Owens' allege that the County's actions constitute a taking of their property rights, which has damaged their remaining property. The County denies that any taking has occurred, and that the facts alleged in the claim letter do not constitute a taking under law. FISCAL IMPACTS• As a condition of subdivision approval the County secured a $10,000.00 bond from the developer to indemnify the County for the reasonable cost of defending any action or claim brought for a wrongful taking of property or damages to property or the purchase of these property rights. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The County Attorney recommends that the Board of Supervisor deny this claim, so that the claimant may proceed to Court. Respectfully submitted, ~~~ Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney Action Approved (x) Motion by Harry Ni k n~ o Denied ( ) nENY CT,ATM and dire. s aff Received ( ) to addrPSS ProSion =roblPm Referred to cc: Fi Paul Mahoney, County Attorney John Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator Vote No Yes Abs Eddy x Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers ;' LAW OFFICES JOLLY, PLACE, FRALIN &PRILLAMAN, P. C. - ,,~ W. H. JOLLY (1927-1966) 105 NORTH COLORADO STREET ROANOKE, VA. 24018 JACK V. PLACE 3912 ELECTRIC ROAD, S. W W. HEYWOOD FRALIN P. O. BOX 279 P. O. BOX 2865 ALTON B. PRILLAMAN (7031 989-0000 DAVID C.HELSCHER SALEM, VIRGINIA 24153 STEPHEN M. YOST WILLIAM C. MAXWELL TELEPHONE(703) 389-2349 B. PURNELL EGGLESTON THOMAS B. DIC KENSON OF COUNSEL FACSIMILE (703) 772-0126 SALEM FACSIMILE (703) 389-9560 August 17, 1990 HAND DELIVERED Paul M. Mahoney, Esq. County Attorney Roanoke County Offices 3738 Brambleton Avenue, SW Roanoke, Virginia Re: Claim of Clark and Emilie Owen Dear Paul: This is to request that the hereinafter stated claim be placed upon the Agenda of the Board of Supervisors for your meeting on August 28, 1990. It is my understanding that the meeting will commence at 3:00 p. m. on that date. The basis for the claim made by Mr. and Mrs. Owen is as follows: That Clark Owen, Jr. and Emilie M. Owen are the fee simple owners of a certain tract or parcel of land lying and being in Roanoke County, Virginia, containing 1.091 acres and designated as Parcel No. 85.04-2-17 on the Tax Maps for the County of Roanoke, Virginia, the same having been conveyed to them by Ralph D. Shivers and Harriette H. Shivers, husband and wife, by deed dated March 11, 1986. That said deed also conveyed to the Owens a "50-foot roadway easement along the southerly line" of the aforesaid 1.091 acre parcel. That the said 50-foot roadway runs across land owned by Walter L. and Virginia B. Henry, they having been conveyed same, inter alia, by the Rufus A. Henry Estate. That the bed of said roadway has, at all times pertinent. hereto been of equal level with and contiguous with the Owens' property line, allowing them access to their residence at virtually any point along their southerly r boundary line, resulting in their regular and frequent use of these various points of access. That by plat dated December 27, 1988, by Fred O. Shanks, III, P. C., the Henrys proposed the subdivision of their property, with a dedication of the foregoing 50-foot roadway, inter alia, to the public to be known as Henry Farms Road. Said plat contains the following notation: "Owners' counsel (sic) is of the opinion the private easement shown over a portion of Henry Farms Road will be extinguished as a matter of law upon the dedication of the road to the public as the purpose for said easement will then cease." The "private easement" thereby referred to is the hereinabove described 50-foot roadway easement conveyed to the Owens. That the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County approved that plat on July 11, 1989 and the same has been recorded. That as a condition of~its approval, the Board required the Henrys to enter into an "Indemnity Agreement", with surety for their $10,000 bond securing same, to indemnify the Board the "reasonable cost of defending any action brought or claim made" by the Owens for the wrongful taking of their property or damages thereto and/or for the purchase of the Owens' rights by negotiation or by eminent domain. That as a further condition of the approval of said plat of subdivision and the acceptance of Henry Farms Road by the public, the same must be completed in accordance with the specifications and regulations of the Virginia Department of Transportation. That the Henrys have undertaken to construct said road by cutting, grading, and bulldozing same and the County has issued the necessary permits for that construction. That as a result of said grading, cutting and bulldozing, the roadbed previously used by the Owens has been totally destroyed, the level of said roadway and easement has nota been greatly lowered below their southerly boundary line barring their free and unobstructed access to their residence as before said construction, and slopes have been created vastly steeper than permitted by the pertinent specifications and regulations which, in places has removed lateral support for the Owens' property necessitating a retaining wall. That for a period of approximately eight to ten weeks, no work whatsoever has been performed, leaving the roadway in a rough, eroded and often muddy condition, making travel thereon dangerous as well as difficult. That during the period in which work has been performed, grading, cutting and work have been done to and upon the Owens' land without their consent, either express or implied. That the foregoing action by the County constitutes a taking of a property right of the Owens, and has resulted in damage to their remaining property for which they are entitled to just compensation. The failure of the road known as Henry Farms Road to be completed in a timely and expeditious manner has caused grave inconvenience and has created a very dangerous condition. This condition virtually amounts to a nuisance forcing the Owens to travel over muddy, bumpy and unsightly terrain to get to their property. Finally, the construction process has resulted in a trespass upon the Owens' land. Based upon the foregoing, the Owens ask the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County to compensate them for the taking of their property and for the damage to the remaining property. They also should be compensated for any damages that have been suffered by them as a result of any trespass on their property. These monetary claims amount to $10,000.00. Finally, they claim that the Board should specifically require that Henry Farms Road be immediately and expeditiously constructed in strict conformity with all applicable specifications and regulations of the County and of the Virginia Department of Transportation so that this road will be taken as soon as possible into the State Highway System in such a way that all retaining walls, culverts and other devices be installed to protect access to their property and to assure its lateral support. Respectfully submitted, CLARK OWEN, JR, and EMILIE M. OWEN By ~.~L~.~G~"-!L Their attorney cc: Mr. and Mrs. Clark Owen i lw.. L-'I AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR CENTER ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 28, 1990 RESOLUTION 82890-5 APPROVING A SPECIFIC CAPITAL EXPENDITURE FOR THE ACQUISITION BY THE ROANORE REGIONAL AIRPORT COMMISSION OF 8.125 ACRES OF LAND FOR AIRPORT EXPANSION AND DEVELOPMENT, UPON CERTAIN TERMS AND CONDITIONS WHEREAS, Section 17 (b) of the contract between the City of Roanoke, Roanoke County, and the Roanoke Regional Airport Commis- sion provides that the Commission shall prepare and submit for approval any proposed capital expenditure exceeding $100,000 to benefit five or more future accounting periods; and WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 90-015 adopted August 24, 1990, a copy of which is on file in the Office of the Clerk to the Board, the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission authorized the filing and execution of certain documents on behalf of the Commission for Airport Improvement Grant #3-51-0045-10 with the Federal Aviation Administration. The Commission has submitted a request that the County approve a capital expenditure in the amount of $1,030,000 by the Commission for acquisition of approximately 8.125 acres of land for airport expansion and development. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1) That the County hereby approves the capital expenditure by the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission of approximately $1,030,000 in connection with the Commission acquisition of approximately 8.125 acres of land for airport expansion and development. 2) That the County concurs in the acceptance and execution J • of a grant agreement with the United States of America, Grant #3- 51-0045-10, in the approximate amount of $927,000 for the acquisi- tion of said real estate, and the appropriation of local matching funds of up to $103,000 from retaining earnings of the Commission for this acquisition. 3) That this approval is subject to the receipt of the aforesaid airport improvement grant and to the allocation of the local matching funds from retained earnings of the Commission. 4) That the County Administrator is authorized to execute such documents and take such actions as may be necessary to accomplish the purposes and intent of this Resolution, on behalf of the County, in form approved by the County Attorney. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance Jacqueline L. Shuck, Exe. Dir., Roanoke Regional Airport W. Robert Herbert, Chairman Roanoke Regional Airport Commission ACTION # ,~ ITEM NUMBER '~-~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: August 28, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: Approval of Capital Expense for Roanoke Regional Airport Commission COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~~ BACKGROUND: According to the contract between the City of Roanoke, Roanoke County and the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission any capital expenditure in excess of $100,000 must be approved by the Council of the City of Roanoke and the Board of Supervisors of the County. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Airport Commission wishes to accept a grant from the FAA in the approximate amount of $927,000 for the purchase of approximately 8.125 acres of land for airport expansion for the air cargo service of the airport. This grant would require local matching funds of up to $103, 000 from the Airport Commission. To date, there has been no available space at the airport to offer cargo operators or developers interested in developing air cargo facilities. If the grant is not accepted, there will not be sufficient funds available to purchase these parcels. If the grant is accepted, the $103, 000 required for the local match is available in the retained earnings of the Airport Commission budget. An application has been submitted for a State Aviation grant for $51,500, which would fund one-half of the matching funds. At this time, it looks favorable for the receipt of this grant. FISCAL IMPACT: The agreement between the City of Roanoke, Roanoke County, and the Airport Commission requires a contribution from the County of Roanoke only if the Airport Commission ends the year in a deficit situation. Since necessary monies are available in the retained earnings of the Airport Commission this purchase should 1 ~ - `~ not produce a deficit in the operations, therefore there would be no additional monies required from the County of Roanoke. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approving the attached resolution which authorizes the Airport Commission to proceed with the acceptance of this FAA grant. ~~~~. Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance ~~~ ~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs Approved ( ) Motion by: Denied ( ) Eddy Received ( ) Johnson Referred ( ) McGraw To Nickens Robers 2 Airport Commission W. Robert Herbert, Chairman Bob L. Johnson, Vice Chairman Joel M. Schlanger Richard W Robers Kit B. Kiser 5202 Aviation Drive Roanoke, Virginia 24012 (703) 362-1999 FAX (703) 563-4838 Jacqueline L. Shuck, Executive Director Robert C. Poole, Airport Manager August 20, 1990 Honorable Chairman and Members Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Dear Members of the Board: Subject: Roanoke Regional Airport AIP Grant #3-51-0045-10 (Purchase Land) Raava~ RAAC~ION~L ~'Y As you are aware, Section 17 (b) of the contract between the City of Roanoke, Roanoke County, and the Airport Commission re- quires any capital expenditure over $100,000 be approved by the Council of the City of Roanoke and the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County. I expect that Resolution No. 90-015 will be adopted by the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission at its meeting on August 24, 1990, and will authorize the filing and execution of certain documents on behalf of the Commission for Airport Improvement Grant #3-51-0045-10 with the Federal Aviation Administration, all as more particularly set forth in the attached report. This letter is to respectfully request that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors adopt a resolution approving the capital expenditure by the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission of $1,030,000 necessary to acquire approximately 8.125 acres of land for Airport expansion and development. The federal government is expected to reimburse the Commission for 90% of the cost of the acquisition; and the State is expected to reimburse the Commission for 5% of said cost. In order to accept the grant funds this federal fiscal year, the resolution must be adopted prior to September 30, 1990. Thank you very much for your assistance. Respectfully submitted, l Ja ueline L. Shuck Executive Director JLS:csp Attachment cc: Commission Members Legal Counsel August 24, 1990 Honorable Chairman and Members Roanoke Regional Airport Commission Dear Members of the Commission: Subject: Authorize~FAA Grant #3-51-0045-10 (Purchase Land for Airport Development) I. RECOMMENDATION Authorize the Executive Director to accept and execute a grant agreement with the United States of America, Grant #3-51-0045-10, in the approximate amount of $927,000 for the purchase of approximately 8.125 acres of land for airport expansion and development, and authorize the Executive Direc- tor to submit the project to the City and County of Roanoke for appropriate approval as a capital expenditure. Appropriate federal chant funds of $927,000 and local match- ing funds of up to $103,000.00 from retained earnings to an account to be established by the Commission Treasurer. II. BACRGROUND A. With a 25.7% increase in air freight in calendar year 1989, and a 39.6% increase over 1989 for this year to date, air cargo is the fastest growing segment of avia- tion at Roanoke Regional Airport. B. To date, there has been no space available "on airport" "~ to offer cargo operators or developers interested in developing air cargo facilities. C. There are at least 8.125 acres of vacant land immediately contiguous to the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission's property line which could be purchased and developed for air cargo and other aviation related purposes. D. Development of these vacant parcels would help separate air cargo from the area used by general aviation. E. Apre-application and an application for Federal funds in the amount of $927,000.00, were submitted to the FAA on January 29, 1990 and August 7, 1990, respectively; in addition, an application has been submitted for a State Aviation grant in the amount of $51,500.00, which would fund one-half of the 10% in matching funds required to accept the federal grant. Page Two F. The Roanoke Regional Airport Commission's total AIP entitlement funds for FY '90 were $1,295,544, with $198,214 committed earlier for the terminal project and $170,330 being carried over for a future period. G. Preliminary Congressional approval has already been ig ven for the award of the federal grant to the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission. H. Notice of the capital prof ect will be sent to the proper officials for the City and County of Roanoke for their approval after the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission adopts the proposed Resolution and prior to execution of the grant agreement. III. ISSUES A. If the grant is executed prior to September 30, 1990, the funds will be immediately available for moving forward with the purchase; otherwise, the grant allocation will be delayed until the FY 1991 Congressional appropriation. B. If the grant is not accepted, there will not be suffi- cient funding available to purchase the vacant parcels, which may or may not remain vacant; and there will be no readily identifiable space available for development of air cargo facilities. C. Purchase of the land is the necessary first step toward development of cargo facilities. D. Acceptance of the grant will require Commission to commit as little as $51,500.00 or as much as $103,000.00 of its own funds, depending on the amount of any State grant. E. Acceptance of the grant involves the Commission's agree- ment to a number of federally mandated terms and assurances. F. Actual purchase of the real estate will require additional action by Roanoke Regional Airport Commission. Respectfully subm't d, Jacqueline L. Shuck Executive Director JLS:csp . ~.[J - AT A REGULAR MEETING. OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR CENTER ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 28, 1990 RESOLUTION APPROVING A SPECIFIC CAPITAL EXPENDITURE FOR THE ACQUISITION BY THE ROANOKE REGIONAL AIRPORT COMMISSION OF 8.125 ACRES OF LAND FOR AIRPORT EXPANSION AND DEVELOPMENT, UPON CERTAIN TERMS AND CONDITIONS WHEREAS, Section 17 (b) of the contract between the City of Roanoke, Roanoke County, and the Roanoke Regional Airport Commis- sion provides that the Commission shall prepare and submit for approval any proposed capital expenditure exceeding $100,000 to benefit five or more future accounting periods; and WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 90-015 adopted August 24, 1990, a copy of which is on file in the Office of the Clerk to the Board, the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission authorized the filing and execution of certain documents on behalf of the Commission for Airport Improvement Grant #3-51-0045-10 with the Federal Aviation Administration. The Commission has submitted a request that the County approve a capital expenditure in the amount of $1,030,000 by the Commission for acquisition of approximately 8.125 acres of land for airport expansion and development. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1) That the County hereby approves the capital expenditure by the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission of approximately $1,030,000 in connection with the Commission acquisition of approximately 8.125 acres of land for airport expansion and development. 2) That the County concurs in the acceptance and execution of a grant agreement with the United States of America, Grant #3- ~-y 51-0045-10, in the approximate amount of $927,000 for the acquisi- tion of said real estate, and the appropriation of local matching funds of up to $103,000 from retaining earnings of the Commission for this acquisition. 3) That this approval is subject to the receipt of the aforesaid airport improvement grant and to the allocation of the local matching funds from retained earnings of the Commission. 4) That the County Administrator is authorized to execute such documents and take such actions as may be necessary to accomplish the purposes and intent of this Resolution, on behalf of the County, in form approved by the County Attorney. ! t r~' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 28, 1990 RESOLUTION 82890-6 APPOINTING THE FIRE MARSHALL FOR ROANOKE COUNTY AND AUTHORIZING EXERCISE OF POWERS UNDER CHAPTER 3 OF TITLE 27 OF THE CODE OF VIRGINIA AND THE ROANORE COUNTY CODE WHEREAS, Chapter 3 of Title 27 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, provides statutory authority to the governing bodies of counties, cities and towns to appoint a fire marshall and provides for the duties and powers of such official; and WHEREAS, the Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code, previously enacted as Chapter 9 of the Roanoke County Code by Ordinance 52488-13, sets forth the duties and powers of the Roanoke County Fire Marshall in enforcing these codes; and WHEREAS, it is the intent of this resolution to confer upon the Chief of the Fire and Rescue Department of Roanoke County the authority as fire marshall and to designate officers of that department to exercise the duties and powers of the position at his direction. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia as follows: 1. The Chief of the Fire and Rescue Department is hereby appointed as Roanoke County Fire Marshall which position and title shall include the term "fire official" or "arson investigator". The Fire Marshall shall be responsible for exercising all duties and powers of that position or that of the Fire Official granted or implied under Virginia law, including the Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code. 2. The Chief of the Fire and Rescue Department is hereby granted the authority to designate an officer of his department to perform the duties and exercise the powers of the Fire Marshall. Such authorization may include the authority to issue such summons as authorized by law and the responsibility to respond to all subpoenas and summonses directed to the Fire Marshall or Fire Official for Roanoke County. 3. The Chief of the Fire and Rescue Department is further authorized to appoint one or more assistants, who shall have the powers and perform the duties of the Fire Marshall as provided by § 27-36 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended. Such designated Fire Marshall and assistants shall have received the necessary training to exercise the powers granted by § 27-34.2 and § 27- 34.2:1 of the Code of Virginia. 4. The officer designated by the Chief of the Fire and Rescue Department to act as Roanoke County Fire Marshall shall be responsible for the management of the Fire Prevention Division and for the enforcement of the County Fire Prevention Code other ordinances concerning fire prevention and any other fire prevention related activity. Specifically, such designated Fire Marshall and his assistants are authorized to exercise all powers granted by § 27-34.2 and § 27-34.2:1 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended. The designated Fire Marshall and his assistants are further authorized to exercise the powers conferred by § 27-81(b) of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, in the same manner and subject to the same conditions as other authorities. 5. That this resolution shall be in force from the date of its passage. r I On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: yam- ~ - GZu._.~ ~.-~ Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Thomas C. Fuqua, Chief, Fire & Rescue D. Keith Cook, Director, Human Resources Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney Skip Burkart, Commonwealth Attorney Magistrate Police Department Roanoke Law Library, 315 Church Avenue, S.W., Rke, 24016 Main Library Roanoke County Code Book Roanoke County Family Services Court, Intake Counsellor ACTION NO. ITEM NO. '~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: August 28, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: RESOLUTION APPOINTING THE FIRE MARSHAL FOR ROANOKE COUNTY AND AUTHORIZING EXERCISE OF POWERS UNDER CHAPTER 3 OF TITLE 27 OF THE CODE OF VIRGINIA AND THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: G~¢I~~ EXECUTIVE SUNIlKARY • ~ C~~~ ~ ,~~ --~_ ~ . ~ ~~,~ , BACKGROUND' Section 27-30 of the Code of Virginia authorizes the governing body of a county to appoint a "fire marshal" whenever "the appointment shall be deemed expedient." The term "fire marshal" may include "the local fire official" when so appointed for purposes of Chapter 3, "LOCAL FIRE MARSHALS" of Title 27 of the Code. Ordinance 52488-13 which adopted the Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code as Chapter 9 of the Roanoke County Code assigned the enforcement of these code provisions to the Roanoke County Fire Marshal who is also referred to therein as the Fire Official. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The resignation of Ken Sharp as Roanoke County Fire Marshal necessitates the appointment of a new Fire Marshal for Roanoke County. The adoption of Resolution 6-24-86-136 does not provide explicit authority for the exercise by the Chief of Fire and Rescue Department of the powers and responsibilities of Fire Marshal. The intention of this resolution is to vest the duties and powers of the Fire Marshal as provided by Chapter 3 of Title 27 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, in the Chief of Fire and Rescue Department of Roanoke County. Because of the extensive and time- consuming nature of the Fire Marshal's duties, the Chief of Fire and Rescue will be authorized by the Board of Supervisors to designate by proper memorandum an individual who possesses the proper training and experience to perform these duties, responsi- bilities, and powers in the Chief's stead. 1 ALTERNATIVES • ~ _J~". 1. Adopt this resolution to authorize the Chief of Fire and Rescue to designate an officer to perform the duties of Fire Marshal. 2. The Board of Supervisors can appoint an individual by name as the Fire Marshal for Roanoke County every time a vacancy occurs in this position. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends alternative 1 and the adoption of this resolution. Respectfully submitted, ~G'lil.~-Q--~ ~ . Thomas C. Fuqua Chief, Fire and Rescue Department Action Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by Vote No Yes Abs Eddy Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers Y ~[./ -' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 28, 1990 RESOLUTION APPOINTING THE FIRE MARSHAL FOR ROANOKE COUNTY AND AUTHORIZING EXERCISE OF POWERS UNDER CHAPTER 3 OF TITLE 27 OF THE CODE OF VIRGINIA AND THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE WHEREAS, Chapter 3 of Title 27 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, provides statutory authority to the governing bodies of counties, cities and towns to appoint a fire marshal and provides for the duties and powers of such official; and WHEREAS, the Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code, previously enacted as Chapter 9 of the Roanoke County Code by Ordinance 52488-13, sets forth the duties and powers of the Roanoke County Fire Marshal in enforcing these codes; and WHEREAS, it is the intent of this resolution to confer upon the Chief of the Fire and Rescue Department of Roanoke County the authority as fire marshal and to designate officers of that department to exercise the duties and powers of the position at his direction. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia as follows: 1. The Chief of the Fire and Rescue Department is hereby appointed as Roanoke County Fire Marshal which position and title shall include the term "fire official" or "arson investigator". The Fire Marshal shall be responsible for exercising all duties and powers of that position or that of the Fire Official granted or implied under Virginia law, including the Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code. 2. The Chief of the Fire and Rescue Department is hereby _ ~ _~ granted the authority to designate an officer of his department to perform the duties and exercise the powers of the Fire Marshal. Such authorization may include the authority to issue such summons as authorized by law and the responsibility to respond to all subpoenas and summonses directed to the Fire Marshal or Fire Official for Roanoke County. 3. The Chief of the Fire and Rescue Department is further authorized to appoint one or more assistants, who shall have the powers and perform the duties of the Fire Marshal as provided by § 27-36 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended. Such designated Fire Marshal and assistants shall have received the necessary training to exercise the powers granted by § 27-34.2 and § 27- 34.2:1 of the Code of Virginia. 4. The officer designated by the Chief of the Fire and Rescue Department to act as Roanoke County Fire Marshal shall be responsible for the management of the Fire Prevention Division and for the enforcement of the County Fire Prevention Code , other ordinances concerning fire prevention and any other fire prevention related activity. Specifically, such designated Fire Marshal and his assistants are authorized to exercise all powers granted by § 27-34.2 and § 27-34.2:1 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended. The designated Fire Marshal and his assistants are further authorized to exercise the powers conferred by § 27-81(b) of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, in the same manner and subject to the same conditions as other authorities. 5. That this resolution shall be in force from the date of its passage. 1 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. l"Z AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: August 28, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: Requests for Public Hearing and First Reading for Rezoning Ordinances Consent Agenda COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND• The first reading on these ordinances is accomplished by adoption of these ordinances in the manner of consent agenda items. The adoption of these items does not imply approval of the substantive content of the requested zoning actions, rather approval satisfies the procedural requirements of the County Charter and schedules. the required public hearing and second reading of these ordinances. The second reading and public hearing on these ordinances is scheduled for September 25, 1990. The titles of these ordinances are as follows: 1. An ordinance rezoning a 7.35 acre tract of land from RE to M-2 to allow the property to be used as a contractor's storage yard and office; located at 2265 Catawba Valley Road in the Catawba Magisterial District; upon the petition of Lacy G. Alexander. 2. An ordinance granting a Use Not Provided For Permit to construct a microwave tower located at 5673 Airport Road in the Hollins Magisterial District; upon the request of Dominion Bankshares Corporation. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends as follows: (1) That the Board approve and adopt the first reading of these rezoning ordinances for the purpose of scheduling the second reading and public hearing for September 25, 1990 C l _,2 2 (2) That this section of the agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth as Items 1 and 2, inclusive, and that the Clerk is authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this action. Respectfully submitted, ~~.~.`~n Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney Action Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by Eddy Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers Vote No Yes Abs ROANOKE COUNTY REZONING APPLICATION 1. Owner's Name: BURRUSS TIMBER ASSOCIATES Address • P • 0. BOX 266, LYME, NH 03768 2. Appl:_~: ant's Name: LACY G. ALEXANDER Address• 2265 CATAWBA VALLEY DRIVE, SALEM, VA 24153 3. Location of Property: Tax Map Number (s) : PART OF 25.00-2-1 4. Magisterial District: CATAWBA ~. Size of Property: 6. Existing Zoning: 7.35 ACRES n 3~ ~ ~` p~\~D RE Existing Land Use: V~C~ti(T i. Proposed Zoning: M2 Propcsed Land Use: CONTRACTOR OFFICE & EQUIPMENT STORAGE - 8. Comprehensive Plan Designation: RURAL VILLAGE 9. Are Conditions Proffered With This Request? Yes XX No (If you are voluntarily offering proffers as a part c,~f your applica- tion, these proffers must be in writing. A member of the Planning Staff can assist you in the preparation of these proffers.) 10. Value of Land and (Proposed) Buildings: $150,000.00 11. The Following Items Mulic tionbWilleNot1Be AcceptedlIf apnynOfPThese Check If Enclosed. App Items Are Missing Or Incomplete: X Letter of Application Concept Plan X Metes and Bounds Description Li~~t of Adjacent. Owners of Property (Attach Exhibit A) Vicinity Map Application Fee Written Proffers Water and Sewer Application (If Applicable) 12. Signature Of roperty Owner, Contract Purchaser, Or Owner's ,ant: •~ q S i nature Date D" '" ` g ~~~ Date Rec .: " ~ Q~' Received By: u f ~c~ca+ Case No.: ~S~cc Ord. No. __ 1~ u ~ P ~~ ~. ~,~!< ~-/ June 25, 1990 T0: Chairman and Members of the Roanoke County Planning Commission This request is for the purpose of rezoning a portion of the property Lacy Alexander has under contract to purchase, from RE to M2. Alexander and Sons Excavating Contractor is a growing firm that desires to expand their operation. The office is located on Route 311 approximately one mile south of this site. There is inadequate space for employee parking and no space for their equipment to be stored between jobs. At present the equipment is stored on a farm in the Bradshaw area. This site would allow the operations to be combined. A ride along Route 311 from Route 419 to Catawba Mountain will reveal a mix of commercial, industrial, institutional and residential uses. We believe this use would blend in well with the other uses and, with the proposed screening, would have no adverse visual effect on the area. The proposed site is a small alcove in the side of Fort Lewis Mountain that is surrounded by steep and high slopes on three sides and has a heavy stand of mature deciduous trees. The site could be visually isolated from any neighboring residents by a combination of the following: high and steep slopes, the stand of deciduous trees around the perimeter, additional planting of evergreen shrubs, and a safety fence with plastic strips. This site would have minimal effect on the traffic. The increased traffic would be in the range of 30-50 trips per day at off-peak hours. The Contractor/Purchaser (Alexander and Sons) agrees to proffer the following condition: 1. The site dill be developed in substantial compliance with the conceptual plan. John D. Abbott, P.E., L.S. JDA:nk ~, 4;'!*: ~~`j'~~ ~`~. '' ~~~. ~~'~ C®M1~®Ti1'SV~~I/'~'~T of VII~~II'~TIA ,~~o,~..a,,~~W„h,he Roanoke County - Vinton Health Department Slate DeDar,me~t of Health P. 0. Box 307 VINTON. VIRGINIA 241 79 May 18, 1990 Alexander and Son Contractors 2265 Catawba Valley Drive Salem, VA 24153 RE: application for permit 4190-180-0102 Dear Mr. Alexander: On May 15, 1990, you and I met on a 200 plus acre tract of land on Catawba Valley Drive known as tax map 4t 25.00-2-1. On this date, in accordance with your application for a sewage disposal permit I. D. tt90-180-0102, I conducted a soil evaluation. ~~ This evaluation revealed evidence that a sewage disposal system permit can be issued on this property. This permit will not be issued until the location of your proposed structure is staked and the area of the drainfield cleared. Glhen this has been accomplished, please contact me so that I can issue your permit. Sincerely, J ~1~ David Taylor / Sanitarian /pl ~i - / In the space .below, please type in the metes and bounds legal description of the property requested for rezoning. If an accurate metes and bounds description of the property does not exist, you are responsible for obtaining an accurate description prior to submittal of a rezoning request. Your application will not be accepted without this description. The metes and bounds descriptio:~ :oust coincide with the area depicted on the cai~ueYt plan. As an alternative to completing this form, you may provide us this information on a 5 1/4 inch floppy disk composed in Wordperfect 5.0 format. Owner' s Name : LACY G ALEXANDER . CONTRACT PURCHASER Date : 6-27-90 DESCRIPTION: BEGINNING at a point on the west side of Route 311 on the line between Joseph C. Thomas and Burruss Timber Associates, then with Thomas N 72° 02' W 300.00 ft. to a point; thence a new line through Burruss ° ~ ~~ Timber Associates S 6 28 05 E 1200.00 ft. to a point; thence with another new line S 72° 02' E 300.00 ft. to a point on the west R~W of Route 311; thence with Route 311 the following eight courses: 1) N 3° 25' W 207.73 ft. 2) N 14° 30' W 128.00 ft. 3) N 7° 30' W 155.00 ft. 4) N 11° 45' W 108.00 ft. 5) Curve to right, radius equal to 1457.4 ft., bearing equal to N 6° 10' W, chord equal to 255.00 ft., arc equal to 255.33 ft. 6) N 1° 25' 30" E 215.00 ft. 7) N 13° 30' W 118.00 ft. 8) N 3° 10' 10" E 18.50 ft. to the BEGINNING, containing 7.35 acres. 3 100' 0' 100' 200' 300' •OOt SOO' ~-~ I"• 200' GRAPHIC SCALE 1-2. N. 3' 25'W.,~207.73 ft. 2-3, N. 14' 30' N.; 128.00 ft. 3-4, N. 7' 30' N., 155.00 ft. 4-5, N. 11' 45' W., 108.00 ft. 5-6. ARC= 255.33 ft., RAO.= 1457.4 ft., C.B.= N. 6' 10' W., 255.00 ft. 6-1, N. 1' 25' 30" E., 215.00 ft. 7-8, N. 13' 30' N., 118.00 ft. 8-9, N. 3' 10' 10" E., 18.50 ft. 0 ~ • ~ OR~IN 0 , ~ DITCN h0 :':•~EVERGREEN TREE-S 20'e.a .~f/ one 7.35 ACRES ti~ ENCE y' REMAINING PROPERTY OF BURRUSS TIMBER ASSOCIATES TAX MAP 25.00 - 2- I D. 8. I I85, PG. T43 6.28'OS"E., I rvTURc OMEN ~TpR~~[ 7`~ t 1NED U ~uTURE ~' wu,~Dwo ~~ EVERGREEN TREE - S'~ • ~ . 20' e.e. ~ OMEN lTOR10[ h ,3, o, ttuiw,Na w' •O~ ` N o N rs .r t= .r -'"EVERGREEN SI~U85-S'ec. '~ DECIDUOUS TREES-I"CALIPER, 30'e.e. „, 1 N 8 1 11~ M V N O ~ , ' N N _ V ' ~ N •, N N X30' E.YTRANCE~ ~ ~ 'ATAWBA VALLEY DR. p P V N N N N N O M Y M Y P 4 Q ~ O O O O O O N N ~ - ~ ~ N 1 1 j• ~ N N N N N N ~ 1 1 1 t , ~ ~Y... -,~p,50N ,.. _.___~EEK ~~~ "' ~. D. B. 1213 , PG ~ 3 -~ ~i~_ SURVEY FOR ALEXANDER & SON CONTRACTORS FOR REZONING 8 ACRE TRACT iiTUATE ON RT. 311. CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DIiTRICT. ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA JOHN D. ABBOTT ' JOB NO•: SCALE: I ' = 200 P. E ., C.L.S. I oArE: JUNE 15, 990 REVISED : NE'. CASTLE, VIAGiNIA VICINITY MAP NO SCALE '--~-- i n~ - n~ 'mom D ' r/ ~ ~ ~ i x'~~ M i c~ Npx f~'~Y1rM1 p CDV( _ O ' ~ - - ~D u:.a ~~ a:~ s ~. Y ! t\ .~ • ~ ..~ -.c S~ .. _ ~,.. .~-~ _ \~ ~ ~-; q' fATAYIBA VA lE~ - ~Y ~" p 9 } // 1 ~~~ ~ G-/ NORT9 l/ I 13 ~ ~ .1 k ~ ~_ 2, InooAc j \ N • 11 3!6 1~ Al 1 RE ' .'~ I~ °~ 90 ooA<lol 1 ~N 10l.12kiq 1 1 ' 1 1 1 ~ w I 1 11111 Ac 1 ~ , 1 ~M ~~ 1 19 1 . ~ 1 ~~ 1 1 OI All ~ '-'~ 1 R E 1 W 1 DIiAc 1 _ ~_ 1 • Map 21 25.13 I'. ap' ( 12Y~oAc 11 RE e 1 ! ]DAc I i O 1 A1~RE I . 1 46 z aA~ lol a A:1c1 1 22 1 e ~ aoeA~ 1 • I 3 20AC ``Q 23 ~ 1 ! 14AC (Cl I 2 Rio ' 1 ~ ~ 2t l•14 `D11 I ~ 6 WACICI 1 ~ 32 F3URRJ~S TI*n$ER g5soc;aT~S CObIMUNITY SERVICBS ~~ Tp M 2 AND DSVBLOPMBNT ~ - oo - z - '"~ V' • ~p ROANORE COUNTY 1~/ d "USE NOT PROVIDED FOR" PERMIT APPLICATION ~ Q ~~ //// 1. Applicant's Name: Dominion Bankshares Corporation Phone: 703-563-7482 Address: 5673 Airport Road Roanoke, VA Zip: 24040 2. Location of Property: At back entrance of Dominion Bankshares Bankcard Operations Center at 5673 Airport Road 3 . New Tax Map # : 38.14-1-4 Old Tax Map # : N/A 4. Magisterial District Location: Hollins 5. Size of Property: 8.6 acre sq. ft. Size of Proposed Use Not Provided For: 9 acres sq. ft 6. Existing Land Use: Dominion Bankshares Bankcard Operations Center Existing Zoning: MlX 7. Proposed Land Use: Site for microwave tower 8. Comprehensive Plan Designation: Development 9. Are Conditions being Proffered? Yes x No 10. Proposed Annual Gross Revenue: N/A 11. Value of Land: N/A Value of (Proposed) Buildings: N/A 12. Value of Machinery & Tools: N/A Number to be Employed: N/a 13. Check Completed Items: X Consultation X Letter of Application X 8}" x 11" Concept Plan X Legal Forms X List of Adjacent Properties Application Fee Public Hearing Notices Issued 14. Applicant's Signature: ~1~~ ~ ~ ~ii..~~ 15. Owner 's Consent, if differen t than applicant: Name: Signature: ----------------------------------------------------------------------- OFFICE USE ONLY: Application Deadline: Hearing Date: Received By: Date Received: Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: _ Action: ?, ~. ~~. _. ._ < . . JJL 3 1~5~, °~~'~~ June 29, 1990 Z' ' '~',j' ~ ~Y k ~~`?t' ., ,~, -, ,,,;;,.. GL~irr;' DOMINION Department of Planning & Zoning Room 600 Roanoke Administration Center BANKSHARES 37 38 Brambleton Ave . , SW P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 Gentlemen: Dominion Bankshares Corporation (DBC) respectfully requests approval for the construction of a 50 to 60ft tower on our property behind our BankCard Operations Center located at 5673 Airport Road. The purpose of this tower is to support one or more 4 ft round dishes for our 23 Ghz Private Operational Fixed Micro- wave Service system between our VISA Operations Center and our Regional. Operations Center at 7711 Plantation Road. Our application, concept plan, and list of adjacent proper- ties which provide full details of the proposed system are attached hereto, and a complete engineering analysis has been done to show that no harmful interference will be caused to other properties or microwave systems. DBC is one of the country's largest commercial banks, ranking 53rd in the United States. 47e offer a broad range of banking services including personal lines of credit, various loan and deposit instruments, trust, VISA, discount bro}:erage, i~isur- ance, and international banking. Data processing functi_o~ls for all of our banking operations (including brandies i~1 Vir- ginia, Maryland, Tennessee, and Washington, D.C.) ire con- ducted from the Regional Operations Center. However, the processing of much of the Bank Card data is done at the VISA Operations Center, located about 2.2 miles away. TY-us, there is a constant stream of both voice and data communications between the two locations. The communications link between the regional Operations Center and the VISA Operations Center is critical to our continued efficiency in providing our many banking services to the public. Communications between our Regional Operations Center and VISA Operations Center are now handled over leased telephone circuits, which carry both voice and data communications. The deregulation of banking and our expansion into other states has created an environment of constant change for DBC. To respond to our growing and changing business, DBC must have the flexibility and capability to expand the communica- Department of Planning and Zoning Page 2 June 29, 1990 ..~- tions network connecting our Regional Operations Center to our VISA Operations Center. We cannot respond adequately to changing industry requirements using the current leased line environment. Timing is crucial in implementing new facilities for the fol- lowing reasons. The VISA Operations Center described is one of DBC's fastest growing services, with ever increasing voice and data needs. Total automation of our branch banks is in process, requiring additional lines to handle increased voice and data traffic. DBC is currently licensing and operating an 18 Ghz microwave system between our Headquarters in Roanoke and our Regional Operations Center. Much of our cur- rent network is hubbed to the Regional Operations Center and microwaved to Headquarters. The applied for 23 Ghz system will complete the necessary data link from the Regional Op- erations Center to the VISA Operations Center and thusly im- pact the entire banking network. Please contact me at 563-7482 if there are any questions re- garding this letter or the attached information. Sincerely, ~~G~ ~ t~~ Thomas C. Saunders AVP Network Operations Attachments cc: Jerry Brittain '"' VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY A 8.6 acre parcel of land, ) generally located at ) 5673 Airport Road ) Roanoke, VA ) within the Hollins ) ~~ ~~ Magisterial District, and ) recorded as parcel ~ 38.14-1-4 ) in the Roanoke County Tax Records. ) Z~0 THE HON0~2Affi.~E SUPERVISORS OF RQANOKE COUNTY: WHEREAS, your Petitioner Dominion Bankshares Corporation did petition the Board of County Supervisors for a "Use Not Provided For" permit for the above-referenced parcel for the purpose of construction of one 50' to 60' microwave tower on 3'x3' concrete base WHEREAS, after due legal notice, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing of the petition on 19 at which time, all parties in interest were given an opportunity to be heard; and WHEREAS, after full consideration, the Board of County Supervisors determined that the "Use Not Provided For" permit be NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDERED that the aforementioned parcel of land, which is contained in the Roanoke County Tax Maps as Parcel 38.14-1-4 and recorded in Deek Book 1144 Page 821 and legally described below, be issued a "Use Not Provided For" permit for the purpose of providing one microwave tower. Legal Description of Property: BEGINNING at an old pipe on the northeasterly side of Airport Road (25 feet from the center) at the extreme southerly corner of property of Blue Ridge Memorial Gardens (D. B. 700, page 105); thence with the southerly line of said tract N. 68 degs. 15' S0" E. 150.16 feet to an old pipe; thence with the northeasterly line of the Blue Ridge Memorial Gardens property and the line of M. T. Fidler property N. 88 degs. 20' 14" W. 120.09 feet to an old pin on line of property of Blue Ridge Memorial Gardens; then with line of same N. 68 degs. 24' 14" E. 151.29 feet to an old pipe; thence N. 38 degs. 14' 41" W. 104.36 feet to an old iron pin corner to property of Blue Ridge Memorial Gardens; thence still with line of same N. 68 degs. 25' 12" E. 470.04 feet to an old pin; thence with a new division line through the Patrick property S. 31 degs. 44' 27" E. 478.20 feet to an iron pin; thence with another new line through the Patrick property and 50' distance from and parallel to the line of C & P Telephone Company property (D. B. 1011, page 217) S. 52 degs. 45' W. 661.42 feet to an iron pin; thence with the arc of a circle to the right whose radius is 25.00 feet, whose chord is N. 82 degs. 40' 45" W. 35.90 feet, an arc distance of 38.90 feet to a point on the northeasterly side of Airport Road (25 feet from the center); thence with line of same N. 38 degs. 06' 30" W. 434.95 feet to the BEGINNING and containing 8.46] acres and being as shown on map made by T. P. Parker & Son, Engineers and Surveyors dated January 23, 1979. BE IT FURTf~R 0[tDII2ID that a copy of this order be transmitted to the Secretary of the Planning Cutmission and that he be directed to reflect that change on the official zoning map of Roanoke County. ADOPTED on motion of Supervisor following recorded vote: AYFS: 1~1YS: ABSE@fP: and upon the Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors p U. S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE. 1983-e9~3S6 Frnm Auu~ ~~ed UMB No ~ '?~ .. DO NOT REMOVE CARBONS Aerpnautlcal Study Number © NOTICE OF PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OR ALTERATION US OapQ+~e d ~Tfoortlno^ B Class Ia New Construt;.on W Permanent ^ AlteratWn ^ Temporary (Ourahon C Work Scnetluie Dates Beg,nn,ny upon FAA app E„tl 1 year Incude etleCtive ratl~atetl Dower and ass~9netl fre°uency or ~l~~tmg. proposed or mo0~he0 AM iM or TV broatlcast stations utd~zmg tn~s structwe Incude sue antl configuration of power transm~sswn ones and then supporting towers .n me v~c~nity of FAA faat~ties and public airports Include intormatibn Showing Srte OnentaUOn d~mens~OnS antl construction matenals of the proposetl structure ~. Name and address of individual. company, corpora><~on, e><c COnstNCtiOfl Or alteration. +Number. Sneer Crry Stare and Zip Codes 17031s~~_7~85 afM oaya Taaaphorro Nurnbar Dominion Bankshares Corporation P.O. Box 13327 Roanoke, VA 24040 Attn: Gerald H. Brittain lams, addroaa and tetept+orro number of proportsnt's reprtsasnt~Xf dttisrertt than 9 above. Teledynamics, Inc. g04) 358-3933 3701 Saunders Ave. P.O. Box 6852 Frank p. oretn Richmond, VA 23222 (if more spats is npulred, catnnw on a »pararo sneer. ~ ~ Y.1..w1 .wal RWwillen /COrrlONte ro tM rroareat loot 4. Location of gtnutun A Coortlmates B Nearest City or Town. and State C Name of nearest avport. nel~port.ngntpark. A. Elevatgn of s,te above mean sea level ITO rtearssr seconds or seaplane ease Roanoke 1 1 6 4 Roanoke 3 7 ° 19 r 2 6 " I' I D~uance to s8 ~ t ~ ~~ crest runway tructure to nearest port of e. ~~~ era ~t ~^0~ ~~ above 0 Miles 2 6 0 0 f t. 4~+nd• or ~' ~ ao amused 5 0 Latitude 7 9 5 7 ~ 3 7 ~~ 12l prcection to aB 121 Ovecuon from structure to arrpon C Overall helgnt above mean xa Ievel IA ' 1 21 4 West Lon9rtuds e~qu vapent showrn9tlthe relat~onsn P oe~w+sru9t on arts roenearestpa rtrportlsm(r~more spacaasuequvsd tcort-'nwto^ a separate shnast o/paper and ansc~ Qhrs~nor9le tma0 or 5673 Airport Road, Roanoke, VA Notres ~s repuvsd oy Parr 77 of the Federal Amnon RegWanons f to C. F R. Part 771 pursuant to Section t t Of ol~~sdsra~rvrmore than °s5pp for M st olNnae artdnor more Persons who knowrngfY and wdlrngly wolata rM Nonce rapwrsments o! Pan 77 are suWKt to a faro f tnm,nal roan 52.000 for suoasousnr ollsnses. pursuant to $ecbon 9021x10/ rns Federal Avrar,on Act of 1958. as amended fag U.S.C. 1a721aN 1 HEREBY CERTIFY that all of the above statements made by me are true, complete, and correct to the best of my knowledge. In addition,) agree to obstruction mark and/or light the structure M accordance with establbhed marking 6 Iliahting standards if necessary. „ , 21.8-23.6 GHz Private Operational Fixed Microwave Facility EIRP: Not to exceed 66 dB See Attached Figure Typed Nan,a/TttM of Person iAinq Notltx S/23/90 Gerald H. Brittain, Vice President ~ WNEH344 TT11 PLANTATION IAT: 37 21 1a IONS: 79 67 18 VI8A-D88 LAT: 37 19 20 LONE: T 3 6T 3T ~ - ,2 DOMI~ON BANKSHARES CORPORATION 23 GHz MICROWAVE SYSTEM ~sE~RcH co 11720 Sunrise Valley Drive Reston, VirOirtia 22091 STATE OF VIRGINIA b/10/90 ..~.. IA~~~ 31TE TOPOGRAPHIC MAP 7.6' 3ERIE3 ROANOKE, VA V13A-DBS aMS~ua~ ND T Tb SCE L E SITE LOCATION PLAN V13A-083 ~'~EENaHI~dl 5~-LE ~,,_ ,b. O ~o to Sao 6o Qo N vises -vf3s BG /~ 6. ~QooF E~ . ~~ 7~'~~s[. a~ ~° c w o~ ~{ ~° ~ ~~ C-z PRoPoSEn MONV /PLC LC~it^T _ ter: 37•i9'z c N Lav6 : 7'7 ~ 37' 37" 6. Et: i~~*'~s~. P~Po~Eo ~i~~ ~.r Rcv~+ Goc,t~radv _ 6' /3Cco.~/ ~ Es. r~ihC~tPE7' 3'~4L SITE PLOT PLAN VISA-D8S ~Y V a COMSEARCN An Alliance Telecommunications Company DOMINION BANKSHARES CORPORATION ~_2 5673 AIRPORT RD Comsearch • 11720 Sunrise Valley Drive • Reston, Virginia 22091 • (743) 620-6300 V - 2.0 P/N 102999 -~ 2 ' 2' SECTION LENGTH SEC i SECTION PART! LE8 SIZE BRACE SIZE 8ECTION HEIGHT DIAM i0' V- 2.0 102999 1 9/16' 153! 1/2 • 20' S- 2.S !00312 i- 1/4 S/B 444! 9/16• 20' S- 3.0 100243 i- 1/2 ' 9/!6' S80i BOLT P/N 103762 - FOOT P/N l0004S S - 2.5 P/N 100312 50' 3 --~ PRELIMINARY DESIGN 00 NOT BUILD -- ~ A-32'3 BOLTS _ SEE TABLE ABOVE VIEW A TYPICAL LE8 CONNECTI FOR FABRICATED SECTI B 3' ~ C-C VIEW B ~' - 6" ~ / V - 'x"° ', '~ . g~ S ~ \ ,- 444v 4 r ~: .moo . ~~ /_ ~. `• ~a''suv `~ l _ , ~ _ --_ _ ~ 1 r' -' io~0 GREEN ~g ~MI ~~ ~9 ~ v~,~ ~ i ~ i v ~a - 2 NORTH ewe R G~,,~ty I d ` ~,e U~y RcA a~ . , ..~ i ~ 2 g2 4 }a~ 8 ~G4 1 I 9, -,~ i ,, , . ,~ ,:- ~~ 16~ 4 i3 ~ ~,, { ~~° .e 0 ~'L,~ ~ 19 i i ~e.~ ~ fib, 2d ~ ~. c~ ~t~ ~+. ~~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ `~ ~~ ~ IS ~ 8 ~ 11 DOMZNtOr~( r3aN<<SHA2CS CorPara~~UN COMMUNITY SERVICES tvl1 X ~ ~o ~ G `SUS e r~o+ Prv v; ~{ Fcl ~vr ~~ AND DEVELOPMENT ~~ . (~ _ 1 _ ~ . M1X ~ y M~.... ` AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 28, 1990 ORDINANCE 82890-7 AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A DEED OF EXCHANGE AND PARTIAL RELEASE OF EASEMENT FOR WATER FACILITIES AT TANGLEWOOD MALL WHEREAS, by Deed of Exchange and Partial Release dated April 15, 1987, recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, in Deed Book 1306, page 1966, MRI Tanglewood Rental Investments, Inc., a Delaware corportion [hereafter MRI Tanglewood], granted and conveyed to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County [hereafter Roanoke County] a 0.041- acre parcel of land and certain appurtenant easements, all in connection with the installation and operation of a water pump station by Roanoke County on the land so conveyed; and WHEREAS, The Chesapeake and Potomac Telephone Company of Virginia [hereafter C&P Telephone] has requested that MRI Tanglewood, convey to it an easement for the installation and operation of certain underground and aboveground communications equipment, which easement is at the same location as a part of the access easement conveyed to Roanoke County by MRI Tanglewood by the above-described deed dated April 15, 1987; and WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Department of Utilities has agreed to a relocation of the portion of its access easement which interferes with the easement being granted by MRI Tanglewood to C&P Telephone as described above; and WHEREAS, following recordation of the above-described deed dated April 15, 1987, it was discovered that errors had been made in the plat of subdivision by reference to which the conveyances t in that deed had been made, with the result that the intentions of the parties were not carried out by the April 15, 1987, deed, and the parties thereto now wish to correct those errors by reconveyance to MRI Tanglewood of the erroneously conveyed property and conveyance to Roanoke County of the correct property; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Charter of Roanoke County, first and second readings are required to pass all ordinances; and WHEREAS, a first reading of the proposed ordinance was held on August 14, 1990; the second reading was held on August 28, 1990. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia as follows: 1. That the release of the 0.041-acree parcel and the appurtenant easements to MRI Tanglewood as described in the deed of April 15, 1987, in consideration of the conveyance of that certain 0.041-acre parcel of land as shown on the plat dated April 23, 1990, made by T.P. Parker & Son, entitled "Easement Plat for C&P Telephone Company. ," along with a perpetual easement for ingress and egress and a temporay construction easement is hereby authorized and approved. 2. That the County Administrator is authorized to execute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County as are necessary to accomplish the conveyance of this property, all of which shall be upon form approved by the County Attorney. 3. The effective date of this ordinance shall be August 29, 1990. On motion of Supervisor Nickens to approve ordinance, and • i carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Mary H. llen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Clifford Craig, Director, Utilities Phillip Henry, Director, Engineering Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney ACTION # ITEM NUMBER ~_I AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: August 28, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: Deed of Exchange and Partial Release of Easement for Water Facilities at Tanglewood Mall COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND' On April 15, 1987, MRI Tanglewood Rental Investment, Inc. deeded a 0.041-acre parcel of land and appurtenant easements to Roanoke County for the purpose of installing a water pump station. The pump station has not been constructed because the City of Roanoke cannot at this time supply additional water at this point. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Chesapeake and Potomac Telephone Company wants to install an underground telephone vault and equipment in the location of the above mentioned easement. The respective staff of Tanglewood, C & P and Roanoke County have developed a plan that will provide adequate space for the pump station, water line easement and the telephone equipment vault. This plan provides for Roanoke County to vacate a portion of the water line easement leading from Route 419 to the pump station parcel. Tanglewood will deed Roanoke County a new water line easement from Route 419 to the pump station that will not interfere with the location of the proposed C & P vault. While developing this plan, the surveyor found the original metes and bounds for the 0.041-acre parcel to be incorrect. The new Deed of Exchange will reflect the correct metes and bounds of the parcel. FISCAL IMPACT' No expenditure of County funds will be required to effect this transaction. ~` STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The first reading of the ordinance was approved on August 14, 1990, which authorizes the Deed of Exchange and Partial Release of the above mentioned property. It is further recommended that the Board of Supervisors adopt the ordinance after the second reading on August 28, 1990. SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED: ~---. ~~ Clifford 'g, P.E. Utility Director ~! - 1~~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by: ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs Eddy Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers .Z / AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 28, 1990 ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A DEED OF EXCHANGE AND PARTIAL RELEASE OF EASEMENT FOR WATER FACILITIES AT TANGLEWOOD MALL WHEREAS, by Deed of Exchange and Partial Release dated April 15, 1987, recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, in Deed Book 1306, page 1966, MRI Tanglewood Rental Investments, Inc., a Delaware corportion [hereafter MRI Tanglewood], granted and conveyed to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County [hereafter Roanoke County] a 0.041- acre parcel of land and certain appurtenant easements, all in connection with the installation and operation of a water pump station by Roanoke County on the land so conveyed; and WHEREAS, The Chesapeake and Potomac Telephone Company of Virginia [hereafter C&P Telephone] has requested that MRI Tanglewood, convey to it an easement for the installation and operation of certain underground and aboveground communications equipment, which easement is at the same location as a part of the access easement conveyed to Roanoke County by MRI Tanglewood by the above-described deed dated April 15, 1987; and WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Department of Utilities has agreed to a relocation of the portion of its access easement which interferes with the easement being granted by MRI Tanglewood to C&P Telephone as described above; and WHEREAS, following recordation of the above-described deed dated April 15, 1987, it was discovered that errors had been made in the plat of subdivision by reference to which the conveyances ~--- ...~ `- in that deed had been made, with the result that the intentions of the parties were not carried out by the April 15, 1987, deed, and the parties thereto now wish to correct those errors by reconveyance to MRI Tanglewood of the erroneously conveyed property and conveyance to Roanoke County of the correct property; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Charter of Roanoke County, first and second readings are required to pass all ordinances; and WHEREAS, a first reading of the proposed ordinance was held on August 14, 1990; the second reading was held on August 28, 1990. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia as follows: 1. That the release of the 0.041-acree parcel and the appurtenant easements to MRI Tanglewood as described in the deed of April 15, 1987, in consideration of the conveyance of that certain 0.041-acre parcel of land as shown on the plat dated April 23, 1990, made by T.P. Parker & Son, entitled "Easement Plat for C&P Telephone Company. ," along with a perpetual easement for ingress and egress and a temporay construction easement is hereby authorized and approved. 2. That the County Administrator is authorized to execute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County as are necessary to accomplish the conveyance of this property, all of which shall be upon form approved by the County Attorney. 3. The effective date of this ordinance shall be August 29, 1990. s ACTION NUMBER ITEM NUMBER I"C~ ~ - S AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: August 28, 1990 SUBJECT: Appointments to Committees, Commissions and Boards COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: 1. Board of Zoning Appeals Five-year term of M. E. Maxey, Vinton Magisterial District expired June 30, 1990. 2. Grievance Panel Two-year terms of Thomas T. Palmer and R. Vincent Reynolds, Alternate will expire September 10, 1990. 3. Industrial Development Authority Four-year terms of J. Carson Quarles and Daniel A. Zahn, will expire September 26, 1990. 4. Landfill Citizens Advisory Committee Carl L. Wright, representative from the Cave Spring Magisterial District has resigned and another representative should be appointed. 5. League of Older Americans Advisory Council One-year unexpired term of Murry K. White who was appointed to the League of Older Americans Board of Directors. The term will expire March 31, 1991. Please see attached letter. SUBMITTED BY: Mary H. Allen Clerk to the Board APPROVED BY: ~C Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator "~ ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Eddy Received ( ) Johnson Referred ( ) McGraw To ( ) Nickens Robers EAGUE ® Area Agency ' o OLDER on Aging AMERICAI~IS ~ 1 ~ ~ 706 CAMPBELL AVENUE, S. W. P.O. BOX 14205 ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24038 TELEPHONE (703) 345-0451 FAX (703) 981-1487 August 15, 1990 Richard W. Robers, Chairman Roanoke County Board of Supervisors P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 Dear Mr. Robers: This is to advise you and the Board of Supervisors that at the July 23, 1990 League of Older Americans Board of Directors meeting Mr. Murry K. White was elected to serve out the remaining term of Mr. Matthew Banks, who died in July. As you are aware, Mr. Banks represented the interests of Roanoke County senior citizens for many years, both on the LOA Advisory Council and Board of Directors, and we will miss him. Mr. White was serving on the Advisory Council as the appointee from Roanoke County per your Board action on May 22, 1990, since he has now moved to the Board of Directors his vacancy on the Advisory Council will need t.o be filled with another Roanoke County resident. We would like to ask the Supervisors to appoint someone at this time. If you have any questions or need more information please feel free to call me at 345-0451. Sincerely, 1 I Susan B. Williams Executive Director cc: Elmer Hodge John Eure, Chairman Prentiss Webb, President SERVING VIRGINIA'S FIFTH PLANNING DISTRICT AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 28, 1990 RESOLUTION 82890-8 APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM L- CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. that the certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for August 28, 1990 designated as Item L - Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved•and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 5, inclusive, as follows: 1. Approval of Raffle Permit - Botetourt Jaycees 2. Confirmation of Committee Appointments to the Community Corrections Resources Board and the Industrial Development Authority. 3. Resolution requesting acceptance of Kings Chase Drive, Fox Croft Circle and Huntmaster Circle into the VDOT Secondary System. 4. Acceptance of water and sanitary sewer facilities serving Kings Chase - Section 1. 5. Donation of a drainage easement, Lot 73, Section 1, Kings Chase. 6. Approval of Raffle Permit - Northside Athletic Booster Club 2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this resolution. On motion of Supervisor Johnson with the addition of Item 6, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors 8/30/90 CC: Phillip Henry, Director of Engineering Arnold Covey, Director of Development & Inspections Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney A-82890-8.a ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER 1- -"""~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: August 28, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: Request for approval of a Raffle Permit from the Botetourt Jaycee's Inc. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Botetourt Jaycee's Inc. has requested a Raffle Permit to hold a raffle on October 6, 1990. This application has been reviewed with the Commissioner of Revenue and he recommends that it be approved. The Botetourt Jaycee's meet in the County and must therefore apply for their raffle permit with Roanoke County. The organization has paid the $25.00 fee. The permit application is on file in the Clerk's Office. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the application for a Raffle Permit be approved. SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: Mary H. Allen Elmer C. Hodge Clerk to the Board County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved (X) Motion by: Bob L. Johnson No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Eddy x Received ( ) Johnson x Referred ( ) McGraw x To ( ) Nickens x Robers x cc: File Bingo/ Raffle File ~-r COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA COMMISSIONER OF THE REVENUE APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO CONDUCT RAFFLES OR BINGO Application is hereby made for a bingo game or raffle permit. This application is made subject to all County and State laws, ordinances, rules, and regulations now in force, or that may be enacted hereafter and which are hereby agreed to by the under- signed applicant and which shall be deemed a condition under which this permit is issued. All applicants should exercise extreme care to ensure the accura- cy of their responses to the following questions. Bingo games and raffles are strictly regulated by Title 18.2-340.1 et. se~C. of the criminal statutes of the Virginia Code, and by Section 4-86 et. se of the Roanoke,County Code. These laws authorize the County Board of Supervisors to conduct a reasonable investiga- tion prior to granting a bingo or raffle permit. The Board has sixty days from the filing of an application to grant or deny the permit. The Board may dene'inustrict compliancetwithPtounty and organization found not to b state law. Any person violating county or state regulations concererson hwho permits shall be guilty of a Class 1 misdemeanor. Any p uses any part of the gross receipts from bingo or raffles for any purpose other than the lawful religious, charitable, community, or educational purposes for which the organization is specifi- cally organized, except for reasonable operating expenses, shall be guilty of a Class 6 felony. THIS APPLICATION IS FOR: (check one) RAFFLE PERMIT ~/ BINGO GAMES Name of Organization ~L~ ! ~- ~ ~~~~-~=~~ ~ ~~`'~ ~ L'~`.7 Street Address b>~l°"IS I~~~.l , '1 ~~'~•17`I~7 fIJD~ I~r~ ~~ ~ ~~i~ ~~t~ V~ `~~~~~~ _~ Mailing Address ~ ~' ~ ~~u~- ~ ~ ~-~ ~ City, State, Zip Code -~Ig~-~='~y ~ ~-~-~= ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~1~ Purpose and Type of Organization ~~;;,;~ _ ~~~I~ t--~-~~~~=-~ ~~ ~~~ T ~t~l ~ I ~~ r i I ltrl C` tJ~'~'t~11~ I Z ~a 71 C~.S When was the organization founded? F~(~~ 1 Roanoke County meeting place? D~~~~ 1 ~~~`~ ~~~~~~~~~~ Has organization been i~ existence in Roanoke County for two con- tinuous years? YES ~ NO Is the organization non-profit? YES ~ NO -- `~~~~ ~~ ~~ 1 Indicate Federal Identification Number # ~ Attach copy of IRS Tax Exemption letter . ~~ ~ 1 ~- t' Officers of the Organization: z~~- , Vice-President ~Ik. AC~~ President: ~OV~1 '~~~~~ - p,dd.ress::~~35 ~L..I~k~D~TI-~ ~i. Address:~~°l ~~(~C-i-J ~T. I~ y: ~= ~° (~ Treasurer: ~~C~ ~~ ~ ~~ Secretar (,~~- - _ _ Address : ~ ~' ~ , ~h-''~ ~~' Address: (~~ ~~~ ~~~-~-~f'~ '~~ ~;, Member authorized to be responsible for Raffle or Bingo opera- tions: Name ~ ti~~.~~ ~ (~Y1 Home Add r e s s ~• ~ . I "r (--~ ~ ~.. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ (fir' I~ ~;_ ~~ ~ ~~.._ ~_ ~,~ `v' I~ ~~c'~-'~ ~ Phone ~/"/ -~ - c~ ~ ~-~ Bus . Phone ~ ~ t~ _ DC1(~ A COMPLETE LIST OF THE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF CURRENT MEMBER- SHIP MUST BE FURNISHED WITH THIS APPLICATION. Specific location where Raffle or Bingo Game is to be conducted. '~~ Time of Drawing ~~ uu ~• ~ RAFFLES: Date of Drawing CSC l . ~a ; BINGO: Days of Week & Hours of Activity: Sunday Monday -Tuesday Wednesday -Thursday .Friday Saturday From To From_ To From To From To From To From To From ~~ To 1 U : o~ ~IYi 2 State specificallyli°thehelannedeor intended usegofRthelproceedse used. List in deta P Use estimates amounts if necessary. ~ ~ 1 ~ i ~ F~~ -~~~ ~ '~~~.~ Gam' C~ ~- i'~ff ~~--~~ ~ ~' ~~ 3 BINGO: Complete the following: Legal owner(s) of the building where BINGO is to be conducted: Name: Address: County State Zip Is the building owned by a 501-C non-profit organization? Seating capacity for each location: Parking spaces for each location: ALL RAFFLE AND BINGO APPLICANTS MUST ANSWER QUESTIONS 1 - 19 1. Gross receipts from alol bbucr lendarlquar eroforep~por calenf Bingo games or Instant Bing y dar year period. INSTANT BINGO BINGO lst Quarter 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter 1st Quarter 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter Total Total 2. Does your organization understand erson orsfirm,o associa£ law to enter into a contract with any p tio.n, organization, partnership, or corporatign of any clasosrfcon- tion whatsoever, for the purpose of organizin managing, ducting Bingo Games or Raffles? y"~_ 3. Does your organiz ftrecei is andadisbursementsspertainingato file complete records o p Bingo games and Raffles, and that such records are subject to audit by the Commissioner of the Revenue?~~'~ 4. Does your organiza neenhas t he righttto go uponothes premises the Revenue or his desig on which any organization is conducting a Bingo game or raffle, to perform unannounced audits, and to secure for audit all re- cords required to be maintained for Bingo games or raffles? ~~S 4 5. Does your organization understand that a Financial Report must be filed with tovemberlof lea h calendar yearn forowh ch ae Pere the first day of N mit has been issued? ~~ 6. Does your organization understand that if gross receipts ex- ceed fifty thousand dollars during any calendar quarter, an addi- tional Financial Report must be filed for such quarter no later than sixty days following the last day of such quarter? L~ 7. Does your organization understand that the failure to file financial reports when due shall cause automatic revocation of the permit, and no such organization shall conduct any Bingo game or raffle thereafter until such report is properly filed and a new permit is obtained? ~ ~"~ 8. Does your organization understand that each Financial Report must be accompanied by a Certificate, verified under oath by the Board of Directors, that the proceeds of any Bingo game or raffle have been used for these lawful, religious, charitable, commu- nity, or educational purposes for which the organization is spe- cifically chartered or organized, and that the operation of Bingo games or raffles have been in accordance with the provisions, of Article 1.1 of Chapter 8, Title 18.2 of the Code of Virginia? 9. Does your organization understand that a one percent audit fee of the gross receipts must be paid to the County of Roanoke upon submission of the annual financial report due on or before the first of November? ~~~~ 10. Does your organization understand that this permit is valid only in the County of Roanoke and only at such locations, and for such dates, as are designated in the permit application? ~ 11. Does your organization understand that no person, except a bona fide member of any such organization who shall haverbOrnto member of such organization for at least ninety days p such participation, shall participate in the management, opera- tion, or conduct of any bingo game or raffle, and no person shall receive any remuneration for participating in Management, operation, or conduct of any such game or raffle? `~a'~ 12. Has your orn~nofa$25n00tpayable toe the Countyaof Roanoket fee in the amou Virginia? ~~'~~ 13. Does your organization understand that any organization found in violation of the County Bingo and Raffle Ordinance or §18.2- 340.10 of the Code of Virginia authorizing this permit is subject to having such permit revoked and any person, shareholder, agent, member or employee of such organization who violates the above to having such permit revoked and any person, shareholder, agent, member or employee of such organization who violates the above referenced Codes may be guilty of a felony? ~F~ 5 14. Has your organization attached a complete list of its member- ship to this application form? ~~ 15. Has your organization attached a copy of its bylaws to this application form? y` ~ " ~~~ ~") Ll' 16. Has the organization been declared exempt from roperty taxa- ' n under the Virginia Constitution or statutes? ~ ~\' ro ert , do If yes, state whether exemption is for real, persi a _1 p P c or both and identify exempt property. ~c~ ~c=- L ~ - - ~~'~ ~ ~w 17. State the specific type and purpose of the organization. ~-~v~.~ P (~-~ (-~ r/ ~ ~1(~~' ~+~ ~' ~P a ~~""P--~~ ~.>>aJ~ f i C i VAC ~f-' ~i1~1~Jf ~ ~~ ~ ~ t''~`~ . 18. Is this organization incorporated in Vn~ginia? ~~=~ If yes, name and address of Registered Age ~l;lY1 ~'1'~`°1 ~~ X- ~~~, ~ - _ ~~,~ JA a4 u 1 19. Is the organization registered with the Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Affairs pursuant to the Charitable Solicitations Act, Section 57-48 on.)he Virginia Code? =~ ~ '~1(.~ (If so, attach copy of registratio Has the organization been granted an exemption from registration by he Virginia Dopaattach copy ofl exemptionnd Consumer Affairs? f~ ~ ( If s , ALL RAFFLE APRTICLEST AND PROCEED TO NOTARIZATIONTO BE RAFFLED, VALUE OF SUCH A Article Description Fair Market Value `~ acs . ~' ~~ U ~" 6 ALL BINGO APPLICANTS MUST ANSWER QUESTIONS 20 - 27 BEFORE NOTARIZATION RAFFLE APPLICANTS, GO TO NOTARIZATION. 20. Does your orgarezfreouen d y than two cahlendarodays inhany not be conducted mo q calendar week? 21. Does your organization understand that it is required to keep complete records of the bingo game. These records based on §18.2- 340.6 of the Code of Virginia and §4.98 of Roanoke County Code must include the following: a. A record of the date, quantity, and card value of instant bingo supplies purchased, as well as the name and address of the supplier of such instant bingo supplies, and written invoice or receipt is also required for each purchase of in- stant bingo supplies? b. A record in writing of the dates on which Bingo is played, the number of people in attendance on each date, and the amount of receipts and prizes on each day? (These records must be retained for three years.) c. A record of the name and address of each individual to whom a door prize, regular or special Bingo game prize or jackpot from the playing of Bingo is awarded? d. A complete and itemized record of all receipts and disburse- ments which support, and that agree with, the quarterly and annual reports required to be filed, and that these records must be maintained in reasonable order to permit audit? 22. Does your organization understand that instant Bingo may only be con~di ctad such locations a d at suchnt mes as arelspec f eds in and o y this application? 23. Does your organization understand that the gross receipts in the course °eed 33p1/3$nofythe grosstreceipts of an organizationgs may not exc Bingo operation? 24. Does your organization understand it may not sell an instant Bingo card to an individual below sixteen years of age? 25. Does your organization understand that an organization whose gross receipts from all bingo operations that exceed or are ex- pected to excem°dt statusOpursuant tolSection 501 ChoflthevUnited granted tax-exe States Internal Revenue Service? (Certificate must be attached.) 7 26. Does your organization understand that a Certificate of Occu- pancy must be obtained or be on file which authorizes this use at the proposed location? 27. Does your organization understand that awards or prize money or merchandise valued in excess of the following amounts are illegal? a. No door prize shall exceed twenty-five dollars. b. No regular Bingo or special Bingo game shall exceed One Hund- red dollars. c. No jackpot of any nature whatsoever shall exceed One Thousand Dollars, nor shallrtaa texceedmOnetThousandpDolparses awarded in any one calenda Y * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * NOTARIZATION: THE FOLLOWING OATH MUST BE TAKEN BY ALL APPLICANTS I hereby swear or affirm under the penalties of perjury as set forth in §18 • 2 °rue to theebest of mynknowledge,a information band statements are t beliefs. All questions have been answered. Signed by: me ;} G s~ ~ A ~ ~c.~yvl ~ c. C, d~~ H/olme Address ~~~~~'~ t h i s ~ ~~ day o f t-T(.L~ 19 Tit Subscribed and sworn before me, M commission expires: ` A t 19~ RETURN THIS COMPLETED APPLICATION T0: ~ ~ c '~ Notary Public COMMISSIONER OF THE REVENUE P.O. Box 20409 Roanoke, VA 24018-0513 8 NOT VALID UNLESS COUNTERSIGNED The above application, having been found in due form, is approved and issued to the applicant to have effect until December 31st of this calendar year. ,.- -, j' ~ ~ J`'~ Date Commis Toner of the Revenue r The above application is not approved. ` Date Commissioner of the Revenue 9 ACTION NO. A-82890-8.b ITEM NUMBER 'r ,rZ/ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: August 28, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: Confirmation of Committee Appointments to the Community Corrections Resources Board and the Industrial Development Authority COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The following nominations were made at the August 14, 1990 meeting and should be confirmed by the Board of Supervisors: Community Corrections Resources Board Supervisor Eddy nominated Edmund Kielty to serve a one-year term from August 13, 1989 to August 13, 1990 and to reappoint him to another one year term expiring August 13, 1991. Industrial Development Authority Supervisor Johnson nominated J. Carson Quarles to serve another four-year term expiring September 26, 1994. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the above nominations be confirmed. SUBMITTED BY: Mary H. Allen Clerk to the Board APPROVED BY: ~ C /~" Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved (x) Motion by: Bob L. Johnson No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Eddy x Received ( ) Johnson x Referred ( ~ McGraw x To ( ) Nickens x Robers x cc: File Communications Corrections Resources Board Fi_Le Industrial Development Authority File W^°" AT THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 28, 1990 RESOLUTION 82890-8.C REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF RINGS CHASE DRIVE, FOX CROFT CIRCLE AND HUNTMASTER CIRCLE INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That this matter came this day to be heard upon the proceedings herein, and upon the application of Kings Chase Drive from its intersection with Buck Mountain Road (Route 679) to the terminus at the cul-de-sac for a distance of 0.17 miles, Fox Croft Circle, and Huntmaster Circle from its intersection with Kings Chase Drive to their terminus at the cul-de-sac for a distance of 0.09 and 0.05 miles, respectively, to be accepted and made a part of the Secondary System of State Highways under Section 33.1-229 of the Virginia State Code. 2. That it appears to the Board that drainage easements and a fifty (50) foot right-of-way for said roads have heretofore been dedicated by virtue of a certain map known as Section No. 1, King's Chase Subdivision recorded March 6, 1989 in Plat Book 11, Page 112, and subsequent drainage easements in the records of the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, and that by reason of the recordation of said map and deed no report from a Board of Viewers, nor consent or donation of right-of-way from the abutting property owners is necessary. The Board hereby guarantees said right-of-way for drainage. ~ ~ r 3. That said roads known as Kings Chase Drive, Fox Croft Circle and Huntmaster Circle which are shown on a certain sketch accompanying this Resolution, be, ana zne edl«G alG •---___1 established as public roads to become a part of the State Secondary System of Highways in Roanoke County, only from and after notification of official acceptance of said streets by the Virginia Department of Transportation. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: `~') Lit-~.~ - ~-~~~"~,. Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Phillip Henry, Director, Engineering Arnold Covey, Director, Development & Inspections, and copy for Virginia Department of Transportation ITEM NUMBER ~--'~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: August 28, 1990 SUBJECT: Acceptance of Kings Chase Drive, Fox Croft Circle and Huntmaster Circle into the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Fralin and Waldron Inc. the developer of King's Chase, Section 1, requests that the Hoard of Supervisors approve a resolution to the Virginia Department of Transportation requesting that they accept 0.17 miles of Kings Chase Drive, 0.09 miles of Fox Croft Circle and 0.05 miles of Huntmaster Circle. The staff has inspected these roads along with representatives of the Virginia Department of Transportation and found that these roads are acceptable. FISCAL IMPACT- No county funding is required. RECOMMENDATIONS: The staff recommends that the Board approve a resolution to the VDOT requesting that they accept Kings Chase Drive, Fox Croft Circle and Huntmaster Circle into the Secondary Road System. '". SUBMITTED BY: Phillip Henry, P. E. Director of Engineering APPROVED: ~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator --------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Eddy Received ( ) Johnson Referred McGraw to Nickens Robers 2 L -- ~ AT THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 28, 1990 RESOLUTION REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF KINGS CHASE DRIVE, FOX CROFT CIRCLE AND HUNTMASTER CIRCLE INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That this matter came this day to be heard upon the proceedings herein, and upon the application of Kings Chase Drive from its intersection with Buck Mountain Road {Route 679) to the terminus at the cul-de-sac for a distance of 0.17 miles, Fox Croft Circle, and Huntmaster Circle from its intersection with Kings Chase Drive to their terminus at the cul-de-sac for a distance of 0.09 and 0.05 miles, respectively, to be accepted and made a part of the Secondary System of State Highways under Section 33.1-229 of the Virginia State Cade. 2. That it appears to the Hoard that drainage easements and a fifty (50) foot right-of-way for said roads have heretofore been dedicated by virtue of a certain map known as Section No. 1, King's Chase Subdivision recorded March 6, 1989 in Plat Book 11, Page 112, and subsequent drainage easements in the records of the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, and that by reason of the recordation of said map and deed no report from a Board of Viewers, nor consent or donation of right- of-way from the abutting property owners is necessary. The Board hereby guarantees said right-of-way for drainage. 3 ~ --3 3. That said roads known as Kings Chase Drive, Fox Croft Circle and Huntmaster Circle which are shown on a certain sketch accompanying this Resolution, be, and the same are hereby established as public roads to become a part of the State Secondary System of Highways in Roanoke County, only from and after notification of official acceptance of said streets by the Virginia Department of Transportation. 4 ~-- -.~ '~. ry ~" NORTE ~ ~ „ V ~ ~ M 8 ffaaao m b ~ M u' .. /. - ~ ~ '' ` i'lO q r 11 p B) • ~ •rof E r r xe O ~~ ~~` • • \ ~ 9 ~ \ . 3 ' \ F 7 p v+" 4 '• •a 4 e' 3 8 ~ 7 ~~ ~, 4r/r ... 9 9 s ~ B~~t y r~ ~ _ 4J00 10 4fD• 4•N I~Yy r~e/r 1 '••~ 4lll •IGO 440f ~o• _ SwN ~ Ion h i 31 + re ap/ ~ ..r• ~ •ory k1t / 40r ~~ a ~~ ~ IO ~ _ r r• 4p, • j ~ ~ ~ u ~~ ~~~ u o f j r 2i N II ~ 4 / 4i / 4Z' ~ •• 4,/) tt r ~ ~ 44p, H tS/~c u / Y/O NH S A $ ~ ~ 109AC /o N / ~ ~ n 13 Yrf u ~h ~ w IIN M r II b IN/ 6 OS Ac lDl 4))t • 7 15 .I 1 ur4 1071e fie urv ~ r 24 ~ 26 O t03k 14i A[ M - ~~ ~ K PROPOSED ADDITION SHOWN IN GRAY DESCRIPTION: 1) KINGS CHASE DRIVE FROM THE INTERSECTION OF BUCK MOUNTAIN ROAD (RT 679) TO CUL-DE-SAC. ' 2) FOX CROFT CIRCLE FROM THE INTERSECTION O F KIN GS CHASE DRIVE TO CUL-DE-SAC. 3) HUNTMASTER CIRCLE FROM THE INTERSECTION O F KIN GS CHASE DRIVE TO CUL-DE-SAC. LENGTH: (1) 0.17 MILES (2) 0.09 MILES (3) 0.05 MILES RIGHT OF WAY: (1) 50-60 FEET (Z) 50 FEET (3) 50 FEET ROADWAY WIDTH: (1) 31-39 FEET (2) 31 FEET (3) 31 FEET SURFACE WIDTH: (1) 26-34 FEET (2) 26 FEET (3) 26 FEET SERVICES: (1) 7 HOMES (2) 5 HOMES (3) 3 HOMES IMPROVEMENTS NECESSARY: ACCEPTANCE OF KINGS CHASE DRIVE, FOX CROFT CIRCLE COMMUNITY SERVICES AND HUNTMASTER CIRCLE INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT AND DEVELOPMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 5 J ACTION # A-82890-8.d ITEM NUMBER L- "" AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: August 28, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: Acceptance of Water and Sanitary Sewer Facilities Serving Kings Chase - Section 1 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Developers of Kings Chase, Fralin & Waldron, Inc. have requested that Roanoke County accept the Deed conveying the water and sanitary sewer facilities serving the subdivision along with all necessary easements. The water and sewer facilities are installed, as shown on plans prepared by Lumsden Associates, P.C. entitled Kings Chase - Section 1, dated February 15, 1989, which are on file in the County Engineering Department. The water and sanitary sewer facility construction meets the specifications and the plans approved by the County. FISCAL IMPACT• The value of the water and sanitary sewer construction is $112,400 and $96,400 respectively. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors accept the water and sanitary sewer facilities serving the subdivision along with all necessary easements, and authorize the County Administrator to execute a Deed for the transfer of these facilities. L -~ SUBMITTED BY: Clifford ig, P.E. Utility Director Approved (x) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to APPROVED: ~' G ~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ACTION Motion by: Bob L. Johnson VOTE No Yes Abs Eddy x Johnson x McGraw x Nickens x Robers x cc: File Clifford Craig, Director, Utilities Phillip Henry, Director, Engineering ACTION NO. A-82890-8.e ITEM NO . ~ ' .~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: August 28, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: Donation of drainage easements situated on Lot 73, Section 1, Kings Chase to the County of Roanoke COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: This consent agenda item involves the donation by Fralin & Waldron, Inc. of two drainage easements across the northwesterly portion of Lot 73, Section 1, Kings Chase (P. B. 11, page 112). Said easements are designated as "New Drainage Easement #1" and "New Drainage Easement #2" upon a plat prepared by Lumsden Asso- ciates, P.C. dated 6 August 1990. The location and dimensions of these easements have been reviewed and approved by the County's engineering staff. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends acceptance of these easements. Respectfully submitted, Vi ki L. H ma Assistant Co ty Attorney Action Approved (x) Motion by Bob r., ohn~~n Denied ( ) Johnson Received ( ) McGraw Referred Nickens to Robers cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Development & Inspections Clifford Craig, Director, Utilities Phillip Henry, Director, Engineering Vote No Yes Abs x x x x x ~" r A A ~i ~`. f t ...' ~``. J.~.I \. 1 Fq9`~~ Ropy ~~ j 5 V'~~~"~~k % z ~ 0 9. ~S% ~94~'PO~'c 4 r ~~~te ~ .~'4' S . w ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ z 'ez~, ~ s ~ I ~ ~ GOT 73 ~ F I ~ ~ aC ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~N I r9 w ~ oo I ~. b, ~ '~ ~ 3 ~' ~ ~ ac c.+ w I V 4~ Q` - I - - - ~ ~ , ~ Q ~.- ~• -- --1 ~ o ~ I ~~~Io `'T «. OIAAINA E I Ex~j ``' `~-_..,_ ~ w''~ N L~ y ~a 2 ~ F gSEM Nt I G/M/rs T p G """_- E M ~~ ~ I y ~I FGpOpN'Ar ~ 4~ YVAga' ~' ~ S gZ,75, s e o ~ ~' `S t.. - _. ~ - ~ 9.11 PCi, IlZ) ~B ESM•j ~ ~0p'E' ~ o z ~ ~ ~' _ _ ~ Z / o V. Q - ~- ~~ EXl9f ?p' SAN_ llq Y bE1 `~--~- t` - -~ 8 ~ ~ e ~ ~ N `G9 EXISr, i~'~'~uritra -b+~cr-~ bBMENr ~ ~ Q „ " -9, -°- 4 87° 90'00"E, 15D, r0' CuavE a A ~ - a - w°~r'~r" gUGl~ MDUNrAlN gOAh, S. W. T = is vo' a = zgoo' (VA. SEG. gOUTE # 67'9) A ' S9'?T' BOUNDARY DATA iH. =35.35' NEW DRAINAGE EASEMENT #1 Gk.-f.-9EZ°$0'I¢"E ~ 1-A S 87°3000" E . I1.74 A-B S 13°28'43" W 13.12 GURVE "9" C-~ N 16°13'32" E 10.00 T -~ Z3, 6$' ~ a 300,00' A 47 51' +R ' 47, 52' ~H.9. = 5 7' 03'02 "E cuavE"e" Q = i3'S0'06" f = t5.5?' 3 = 75.00' ~ = Z7. B5' H. = 76.4$' M.g. --~! 75'19'78 "W cuavF "r~". - 6 ° 34' z7" - ri.94' - - z35.bo' -- 53.e5' f - 33,83' '~1, ~~j 53°59't8"W PLAT SHOWING NEW DRAINAGE EASEMENTS HEREBY DEDICATED TO THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE FOR PUBLiC USE ' BY FRALIN b WALDRON, INC, SITUATED ON LOT 73, SECTION 1, KINGS CHASE (P,B, 11, PAGE 112) CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA SCALE: 1" . 30 ~ onTE: 6 AUGUST 1990 LUMSDEN ASSOCIATES, P. C. 6NOIM~16R8•tVRVIIVfSiib.P1,ANN1:Wtl ROANOKH, VIROINIA ~~~pLTN Orn O 'off VINCENT K U 0. ~ 1428 B rt 83- 708 I, I~ f ACTION NO. A-82890-8.f ITEM NUMBER "` AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: August 28, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: Request for approval of a Raffle Permit from the Northside Athletic Booster Club COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Northside Athletic Booster Club has requested a Raffle Permit to hold a raffle on September 14 and 21, October 26 and November 9. 1990. This application has been reviewed with the Commissioner of Revenue and he recommends that it be approved. The organization has paid the $25.00 fee. The permit application is on file in the Clerk's Office. RECOMMENDATION' It is recommended that the application for a Raffle Permit be approved. SUBMITTED BY: Mary H. Allen Clerk to the Board APPROVED BY: Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved (X) Motion by: Bob L. Johson No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Eddy x Received ( ) Johnson x Referred ( ) McGraw x Nickens x To ( ) Robers x _ cc: File Bingo/ Raffle File L- ~ COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA COMMISSIONER OF THE REVENUE APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO CONDUCT RAFFLES OR BINGO Application is hereby madebfectatolall CountyrandfStateelaws, This application is made su ~ ordinances, rules, and regulations now freed cto by the undebe enacted hereafter and which are hereby ag signed applicant and which shall be deemed a condition under which this permit is issued. All applicants should exercise extreme ca ee ~ onsureBingo games cy of their responses to the followingTgtle 18.2-340.1 et. se . and raffles are strictly regulated by of the criminal statutes of tCountrgCode.CThesealaws authorize 4-86 et. se of the Roanoke, Y the County Board of Supervisors to conduct a reasonable investiga- tion prior to granting a bingo or raffle permit. The Board has sixty days from the filing of an application to grant or deny the permit. The Board may deny, suspend, or revoke the permit of any organization found not to be in strict compliance with county and state law. Any person violating county or state regulations corcererson hwho permits shall be guilty of a Class 1 misdemeanor. Any p uses any part of the gross receipts from bingo or raffles for any purpose other than the lawfuo~ whichlthe~organization ismspecifi~ or educational purposes cally organized, except flonreasonable operating expenses, shal be guilty of a Class 6 fe Y THIS APPLICATION IS FOR: (check one) RAFFLE PERMIT X1.5n/~0) BINGO GAMES Name of Organization NORTHSIDE ATHLETIC BOOSTER CLUB Street Address Mailing Address 6758 Northside Hi h School Road City, State, Zip Code oanoke Va. 24019 Purpose and Type of Organization To promote and support all phases of Athletics at Northside High and Northside Junior High as approved by When was the organization founded? 1 Roanoke County meeting place? nTnRTNSTnF uTru GrH00L Has organization been in exiNtOence in Roanoke County for two con- tinuous years? YES x NO Is the organization non-profit? YES X_ _ - Indicate Federal Identification Number # Attach copy of IRS Tax Exemption letter. Officers of the Organization: Vice-President SFF ATTT~'urT1 _ President:*~ nc] T i nr3a Fmi rlr rrohc+ar nr;ve Address: Address: 8312 Treasurer: Secretary: Address: Address: Member authorized to be responsible for Raffle or Bingo opera- tions: Name Marjorie Anderson Home Address 5122 Craun Lane Phone titi~-1417 Bus. Phone 774-555 A COMPLETE LIST OF TH WITHI"1THIS APPLICATIONS OF CURRENT MEMBER- SHIP MUST BE FURNISHED Specific location where Raffle or Bingo Game is to be conducted. NORTHSIDE HIGH SCHOOL 9/14,9/21/10/5T'ime of Drawing 8,,, 10:00 P.M. RAFFLES: Date of Drawing~~_ BIAIGO: Days of Week & Hours of Activity: Sunday Frvm To Monday From _ To Tuesday From To Wednesday From To Thursday From To_ Friday FromR~ pMTo i r, , gfl. PM -y= Saturday From To 2 State specifically how the proceeds from the Bingo/Raffle will be used. List in detail the planned or intended use of the proceeds. Use estimates amounts if necessary. The proceeds from the 50/50 raffle will be used to promote and support the Athletic Programs of Northside High School and Northside Junior High School. The Ways and M2300.OOmmit- tee of the Booster Club needs to raise funds $ 250.00 (see attached to help meet the 1990-1991 budget of $12, eo le budget). These funds will be used solely for the young p p of our community. 3 BINGO: Complete the following: Legal owner(s) of the building where BINGO is to be conducted: Name: Address: County State Zip Is the building owned by a 501-C non-profit organization?~_.. Seating capacity for each location: Parking spaces for each location: ALL RAFFLE AND BINGO APPLICANTS MUST ANSWER QUESTIONS 1 - 19 1. Gross receipts from all sb calendarlqua r eroforeprior calenf Bingo games or Instant Bingo by dar year period. INSTANT BINGO BINGO 1st Quarter 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter lst Quarter_ 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter Total Total 2. Does your organization understand arson orsfirm,oaassociaf law to enter into a contract wi or corporation of any classifica- tion, organization, partnership, managing, or con- tion whatsoever, for the purpose of organizing, ducting Bingo Games or Raffles? YES 3. Does your organizational ds a dadisbursementsspertaining ato file complete records of rec p Bingo games and Raffle ~- of n he Revenue? rYES rds are subject to audit by the Commissione 4. Does your organization us d he raghttto go uponothes premises the Revenue or his designee ha on which any organizationlts candutolsecurelnforgaudit allfre~ to perform unannounced and ~ ames or raffles? cords required to be maintained for Bingo g YFS 4 5, Does your organizatimissionertofdtheaRevenueaonlor before must be filed with the Com the first day ofPa ovember of each calendar year for which a per mit has been issu_ vFC 6, Does your orga dollarsndurangsanydcalendar quartereC a n addi- ceed fifty thousand tional Financial Report must be filed for such quarter no later than sixty days following the last day of such quarter? vFs 7, Does your organizatienshallrcause automaticfrevocationlof financial reports when du Bin o ame the permit, anditeruuntilgsuch r portais properlynfiled and a or raffle therea new permit is obtained? v~~ 8, Does your organization understand that each Financial Report must be accompanied by a Certificate, verified under oath by the Board of Directors, that the proceeds of any Bingo game or raffle have been used for these lawful, religious, charitable, commu- nity, or educational purposes for which the organization is spe- cifically chartered or oreenl ind~accordancetwithpthetp~ovis onsnof games or raffles have b Article 1.1 of Chapter 8, Title 18.2 of the Code of Virginia?YES 9, Does your organizatimustnberpaiddtohtheaCountyeof Roanoke fee of the gross receipts upon submission of the anYESl financial report due on or before the first of November? 10. Does your organization understandttsuchtlocationst and afor only in the County of Roanoke and only a such dates, as are designated in the permit application? YES 11. Does your organization understand that no person, except a bona fide member of any such organization who shall haverbOrnto member of such organization for at least ninety days p such participation, shall pabingopgamelortraffleagandnno person tion, or conduct of any shall receive any rctuofran1OSU h gamer orcraffle 9 1nYFanagement, operation, or condu Y 12. Has your organization attached a check for the annual permit fee in the amount of $25.00 payable to the County of Roanoke, Virginia? ~~~ 13. Does your organizationBindor anddRaffle Ordinanceao ~ §18u2a in violation of the County g 340.10 of the Code of Virginia authoriersonthshareholder, agentt to having such permit revoked and any p member or employee of such organizatierson~ shareholder a agen t having such permit revoked and any p member or employee of such organization who violates the above referenced Codes may be guilty of a felony? YES 5 14. Has your organization attached a complete list of its member- ship to this application form? YES 15. Has your organization attached a copy of its bylaws to this application form? vF~ 16. Has the organization been declared exempt from progperty taxa- tion under the Virginia Constitution or statute ersonal property, If yes, state whether exemption is for real, p or both and identify exempt property. 17. State the specific type and purpose of the organization. lg. Is this organization incorporated in Virginia? NO If yes, name and address of Registered Agent: nt 19. Is the organization registered with the Virginia Departme of Agriculture and Consumer Affairs pursuant to the Charitable SolicitationshActo, Softregistration,~he Virginia Code? No (If so, attac pY Has the organization bntno raAn riculture and Consumerg Affairs? by the Virginia Departme of exem tion.) No (If so, attach copy p ALL RAFFLE APPLICANTS DESCRIBE VALUE OF SUCH ARTICLES, AND PROCEED Article Description THE ARTICLES TO BE RAFFLED, TO NOTARIZATION. Fair Market Value 50/50 To Be Determined 6 ALL BINGO APPLICANTS MUST ANSWER QUESTIONS 20 - 27 BEFORE NOTARIZATION RAFFLE APPLICANTS, GO TO NOTARIZATION. 20. Does your organizatiouen der has two alendarodayssin harry not be conducted more freq Y calendar week? 21. Does your organizatbon ondametaThesearecords basedron §18e2p complete records of the g g 340.6 of the Code of Virginia and §4.98 of Roanoke County Code must include the following: a. A record of the date, quantity, and card value of instant bingo supplies purchased, as well as the naie esndanddwritten the supplier of such instant bingo supp invoice or receipt is also required for each purchase of in- stant bingo supplies? b, A record in writing of the dates on which Bingo is playea, the number of people in attendance on each date, and the amountrecordscmustt be retained forothree years? ) (These c. A record of the naTeo~ns ec ialsBingoagame prizeaort jackpot door prize, regula p from the playing of Bingo is awarded? d. A complete and itemized record of all receipts and disburse- ments which support, and that agree with, the quarterly and annual reports required to be filed, and that these records must be maintained in reasonable order to permit audit? 22. Does your organization understand that instant Bingo may only be conducted such locations and at suchnt mes as arelspec f ed in and only at s this application? 23. Does your organization understand that the ofoinsta t Bingo the course of a reporting year from the playing may. not exceed 33 1/3$ of the gross receipts of an organization's Bingo operation? 24. Does your organization understand it may not sell an instant Bingo card to an individual below sixteen years of age? 25. Does your organizabinnouoperationshthat exceedzorloarehexe gross receipts from all g pected to exceed $75, 0 s0 ursua t tolSection 501 Chof lthevUnited granted tax-exempt stat p States Internal Revenue Service? (Certificate must be attached.) 7 26. Does Your organization understand that a Certificate of Occu- pancy must be obtained or be on file which authorizes this use at the proposed location? 2~, Does your organization uPSS of nthehfollowingoamounts Dare or merchandise valued in exc.. illegal? a, No door prize shall exceed twenty-five dollars. b. No regular Bingo or special Bingo game shall exceed One Hund- red dollars. c, No jackpot of any nature whatsoever shall exceediO es awarded DollarsOrieocalendartdaytexceedmOnetThousandpDollars. in any * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * NOTARIZATION: THE APPLICANTS OATH MUST BE TAKEN BY ALL I hereby swear or affirm under f the penalties in Vir of perjury as set a b forth in §18. 2 of the to Code o the best g knowl dge of my and information statements are true beliefs. All questions have bee n answered. Signed by: y,/~ ~ ~- ~ ~_'/~ Ct'N `~ 1~-~~> j~ ~'_ l ~ ~ 3" '7 C r~ ! ~ ~ ~ ~ C~ --T ~- e ,1 C ~ ~ 7 , ~ 3 ~~ y-~Lt~tC t frir ( C Title f Home Add Name Subscribed and sworn be fore me, this day of 19 - My commission expires: 19 Notary Public RETURN THIS COMPLETED APPLICATION T0: COMMISSIONER OF THE REVENUE P.O. Box 20409 Roanoke, VA 24018-0513 8 NOT VALID UNLESS COUNTERSIGNED The above application, having and issued to the applicant to this calendar year. J - ~l ~ ate been found in due form, is approved have effect until December 31st of ~ ~~ Commi sinner of a Reven The above application is not approved. Date Commissioner of the Revenue 9 ~IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII,III _ ~~ _ - ~. ~.~ ,~ _ PE ARAN CE RE QUE STS. ~ ~~ ~~ a a~~ ,F ~~ - A - - /~ = c - AGENDA ITEM NO. ~ - - - _ ..~ ,~ -_ _ _ __ SUBJECT ~, t- ~" - I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to reco nize me durin the public hearing on the above matter - so that I may comment.WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE - RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES _ - = LISTED BELOW. • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will = decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, c and will enforce the rule unless instructed bythe majority of the Board to - - - - do otherwise. _ • Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Ques- tions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. - • All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized = speaker and audience members is not allowed. • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. _ • Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. _ =_ • INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED = GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION = FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT - - = THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO DEPUTY CLERK _ • _ • _ -~. ~ - • - NAME ~~ V Z \ C. ~"'C ~ C~ ~ ~ r`~ ' - • - • - • - • - - - ADDRESS ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~` - - - _ ; - - = PHONE - ... mlllllllllilllllilllllillillllillllllllillll l IIIIIII11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii~iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii~iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii~~~~,11,E ~u ~~, ~ . ~~~ - - ~' 4.; _ - ~ - ' , ~:., ~ r ~ ,..; ~...; ;.,,i - ~, ,j - - - APPEARANCE REQUEST - - - - - - o ~~ - ~~ ~_ ~~ - ~~ -_ AGENDA ITEM NO. - - - __ _ _ SUBJECT ~^ D~/,~~ ~-r<~~` ~ ~.r - - - - - - I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to = recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter - so that I may comment.WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, - I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE - _ _ - RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINE _ - = LISTED BELOW. __ _ • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment = whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, = and will enforce the rule unless instructed by -the majority of~ the Board ~to - - '- do otherwise. _ = • Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Ques- bons of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. • All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized c speaker and audience members is not allowed. __ • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. _ • Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments __ with the clerk. c __ • INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED _ = GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION = FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT - __ = THEM. - ' _ = - PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO DEPUTY CLERK _ - __ _ _ - _ - ;~ - NAME ~'/ Jew ~ ~~~ ~ - - - - ADDRESS S~ ~~ ~' d~L C':~° i7'~ ~C- .d, f~ - - - - - PHONE ~ ~ 7 - / D S - _ • c m~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~,~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii~niiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiu~ Cprnm~n~s .~ .~ APPEARANCE REQUEST _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ AGENDA ITEM NO. - SUBJECT ~ ~ ~~ J~2~ ~~~~. ~ ~.~~-~ ~ ~_ c _ - _ - _ _ - I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to = reco nine me during the public hearing on the above matter WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, c = so that I may comment. I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR T c RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW. • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment c whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will c decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, = and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to -- do otherwise. c • Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Ques- bons of clarification may be entertained by the Chau~man. c • All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized __ speaker and audience members is not allowed. __ • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. c _ • Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments c with the clerk. _ • INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED c GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION = FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO DEPUTY CLERK - - __ - - = NAME ~ 3 ~.° ~ , C ~ ~ '~. ~= F 3 y~ q g S~ M r= ~. ~ e .~ R ,.. ADDRESS PHONE ~' 7 y ~ 2 g y~ miiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii Iillllllllllll III IIIIIIIIIIIilllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllillllllillllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll IIII IIII II II II IIIIIIj1I :cry, ._ _ " ~ p.. ~°~~.. - .~ - - - - APPEARANCE REQUEST _ _ _ _ _ _ AGENDA ITEM NO. ~ ~"` ~~°^A-- ~ c _ _ = I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to = recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter = - so that I may comment.WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, _ _ - I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR T - - RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES c = = LISTED BELOW. =_ _ • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will c = decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, c and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to - - ~- '- do otherwise. _ • Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Ques- =__ bons of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. Debate between a recognized • All comments must be directed to the Board. ,_ speaker and audience members is not allowed. -_ • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. c • Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments _ - with the clerk. =_ • INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED '- GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION - FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT - - - - __ THEM. _ - PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO DEPUTY CLERK - - - 1 c NAME C~ „S?sza- .~. , ~-~~~ ~~- - -_ - - ADDRESS SZ ~ ~•d ~-~.~- . - - - . -_ K`) / . - O ~ \ ` c PHONE _ mlllllllllillillllllilllililllilllllllllilll IIIIIIiilllllllillllllilillllllllllllilllilllllllllllilllllllllilllllllllllllllli - .~. ~~ ~, . ~ _ _ - ~ A° ,Y? i S P. Y s ~~ .iyt '. ~3 .f 3 ~'~~ r,k. ~~ ~ ~ , ... ~ ~~ _ ~ ~ ~ APPEARANCE REQUEST _ AGENDA ITEM NO. __ = SUBJECT _ _ - - - - _ _ = I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter = _ so that I may comment.WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE -_ RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES =_ LISTED BELOW. _ _ • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment = whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will _ c = decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instruc#ed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. '_ • Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Ques- bons of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. c • All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. _ =_ • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. • Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments _ with the clerk. = • INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED _ GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION =_ FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT c THEM. ~_ PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO DEPUTY CLERK _ - . _ _ _ ~ ,~, NAME ~ . ' ~ ~~ ADDRESS C~ • ' _ _ / / ~~ PHONE m~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Illillllli~llllillllllllllllllllililllllllllllllllllllillllllllllllilllilllillllllllllllillllllllllllilllllllllllllllillllllllllll) wa ~ - s 4 f i y ~~ ~ W ~ ~ _ „ 4. .. . .. ,. _ _ APPEARANCE REQUEST _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - AGENDA ITEM NO. l __ __ SUBJECT ~~~/,r{ ' ~ - ~. _ -_ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to _ reco nine me during the public hearing on the above matter so that I ma comment.WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, c _ _ _ I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FORT _ _ _ _ RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES _ _ _ = LISTED BELOW. _ • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment '- whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, _ and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority-of the Boazd to - do otherwise. - _ • Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Ques- tions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. __ • All comments must be directed to the Boazd. Debate between a recognized c speaker and audience members is not allowed. _ =_ • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. _ • S Bakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments _ p - with the clerk. ___ • INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION _ FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. ' _ PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO DEPUTY CLER _ . _ . _ . _ , c NAME / ~ ~ ~ ,~~~.~,~ ry r '' ADDRESS ,max r'"` ~~ ,~ r -~ ~ ~`~ _ -_ PHONE 3 ~'~ ~ ~" ~ ~' milllilllllllllllilllllllllililllllllllllliilllllllllililllllllllillllllilillilillllllllllilllllllllllillllllllllllllllllilllll - - _ _ _ _ _ _ APPEARANCE REQUEST - - - - _ _ - - - AGENDA ITEM NO. __ _ - ~;,~~ - _ SUBJECT ~ ~ - _ _ - I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to reco nize me durin the public hearing on the above matter _ g - WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, = so that I may comment. _ _ - I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR T _ _ - RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINE - _ - LISTED BELOW. __ • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment __ whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed bythe n~ra~onty of the Board-to - - -' do otherwise. _ _ • Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Ques- = bons of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. c • All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. __ • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. • Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments - with the clerk. '_ • INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED c '- GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION °' FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT - - THEM. - PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO DEPUTY CLERK - = _ - _ - = NAME ~~ ,~ ~~ w .5/~ ~ L ~!~ ~ ~ - ,. - - - ~,~ • - '~ • - ADDRESS ~3 ~~ ~~` - - - - -_ PHONE ~6 ~ _ ~ ~~~ l - - m~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ III Illillllllll I Illillllllllllllilllllllllllillllillllllllilillllillllillllllllillllllllllillll,I,iIIII~II IIII II II III III,IIIIIIIIIII,11J ~ ~~~ - _ - ~'' ~ d~~, ~-~ is ~ .': .~ s . A , ~. APPEARANCE REQUEST _ _ AGENDA ITEM NO. SUBJECT ~~~ ' -~ ~ _ _ _ = I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to = __ - reco nine me during the public hearing on the above matter so that I may comment.WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, c _ I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR T c _ _ _ RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINE __ LISTED BELOW. • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to __ __ do otherwise. akers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Ques- • Spe =_ bons of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. __ -_ Debate between a recognized c • All comments must be directed to the Board. _ speaker and audience members is not allowed. c c • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. • S Bakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments _ p - with the clerk. __ __ • INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. ' _ PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO DEPUTY CLER _ . _ . _ . NAME • ADDRESS • • PHONE c mllilll IIIIIIIillllillllllllllllllllllll IIII l l IIIIIIIilllllllllllill Ilililillliillllllllillllllllllllllllllll l l IIIIiII Ilillll ~,.f - / SOUTHWESTERN VIRGINIA BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION TRADES COUNCIL AFFILIATED WITH BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION TRADES DEPT. A. F. L - C. 1. O. 24 WELLS AVENUE, N. E. • DIAL 344-3036 - 366-3401 -' 343.2021 ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 2016 OUR ORGANIZATION IS CONCERNED OVER THE POSSIBLE INVOLVEMENT OF ROANORE COUNTY WITH THE VA. TECH REAL ESTATE FOUNDATION OR ANY OTHER PARTIES IN THE CONSTRUCTION OF A HOTEL ROANOKE CONFERENCE CENTER, CONVENTION CENTER,OR ANY PROJECT RELATED TO THE HOTEL ROANORE SITE. WHILE WE WHOLE-HEARTEDLY SUPPORT THE PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF THIS PROJECT WE HAVE SOME RESERVA- TIONS CONCERNING IT'S IMPLEMENTATION. ACCORDING TO CORRESPONDENCE FROM DR. SMOOT, VA. TECH VICE PRESIDENT FOR BUSINESS AFFAIRS, THE SELECTED DEVELOPER WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CONTRACTING A MAJORITY OF THE WORK AT THE HOTEL ROANORE SITE. OUR CONCERN IS THAT THE DEVELOPER MAY OPT FOR A "SELECTIVE BIDDING" PROCESS VERUS AN OPEN-COMPETITIVE BIDDING PROCESS. IN A SELECTIVE BIDDING PROCESS, THE DEVELOPER SOLICITS BIDS FROM A FEW INVITED BIDDERS OF HIS CHOOSING. AN ADVERTISED OPEN COMPETITIVE BIDDING PROCESS ASSURES ALL COMPETENT CON- TRACTORS OF AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY TO BE SELECTED FOR THE PROJ- ECT. IT IS THIS PROCESS THAT IS UTILIZED BY ALL PUBLIC WORRS AND MOST LARGE CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS. WHILE THERE IS NOTHING ILLEGAL ABOUT A SELECTIVE BIDDING PROCESS, WE FEEL IT INAPPROPRIATE FOR A PROJECT FUNDED BY PUBLIC MONIES TO BE AWARDED BY A PROCESS WHICH MAY TEND TO DISCRIMINATE AGAINST ANY SEGMENT OF THE COMMUNITY. BE THESE MONIES APPROPRIATED FROM GENERAL FUNDS, REVENUE BONDS, OR GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS. THAT IS WHY WE ARE REQUESTING THAT ROANORE COUNTY MARE THEIR PARTICIPATION IN THIS PROJECT CONDITIONAL UPON THE UTILIZATION OF AN ADVERTISED OPEN-BID PROCESS BY THE DEVELOPER. SOUTHWESTERN VIRGINIA BUILDING ANO CONSTRUCTION TRADES COUNCIL AFFILIATED WITH BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION TRADES DEPT. A. F. L - C. 1. O. 24 WELLS AVENUE, N. E. ~ DIAL 344-9036 - 306.9107 - ~"~ ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24016 ~~' ' ALL SUCCESSFUL BIDDERS AND THEIR SUB-CONTRACTORS COMPLY WITH THE FOLLOWING: 1. Show reasonable effort to utilize the regional work force. 2. A state-certified Apprenticeship or training program. 3. Proof of experience in the particular type of construction and have adequate administrative and logistic capabilities to perform the con- tract0d work. '•. 4. Proof of up-to-date tax payments, licenses, (Unemployment Compensation, Social Security, Federal, State and Local Taxes). 5. A b,onafided Pension Program adhering to all ERISA guidelines. 6. A bonafided Health Insurance Plan with Em- ployer contributions. 7. A Federal I.D. number, for all bidders and their sub-contractors. 8. Be financially sound. 9. Identify themself as an independent company, if a subsidiary, then its parent company and all subsidiaries of its own. 10. An established grievance procedure to resolve any problems which may arise between the Em- ployer and the Employees. 11. Any contractor found to be in violation or debarred from bidding on any other public funded work will be disqualified. ESTERN VIRGINIA BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION TRADES CDUNCiI SOUTNW AFFILIATED WITH BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION TRADES DEPT. A. F. L • C. 1. O. 24 WELLS AVENUE, N. E. • DIAL 344-3036 - 368-3401 - 343.202 ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24016 OUR ORGANIZATION IS CONCERNED OVER THE POSSIBLE INVOLVEMENT OF ROANOKE COUNTY WITH THE VA. TECH REAL ESTATE FOUNDATION OR ANY OTHER PARTIES IN THE CONSTRUCTION OF A HOTEL ROANOKE ' CONFERENCE CENTER, CONVENTION CENTER~OR ANY PROJECT RELATED TO THE HOTEL ROANORE SITE. WHILE WE WHOLE-gEARTEDLY SUPPORT THE PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF THIS PROJECT WE HAVE SOME RESERVA- TIONS CONCERNING IT'S IMPLEMENTATION. ACCORDING TO CORRESPONDENCE FROM DR. SMOOT, VA. TECH VICE PRESIDENT FOR BUSINESS AFFAIRS, THE SELECTED DEVELOPER WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CONTRACTING A MAJORITY OF THE WORK AT THE HOTEL ROANOKE SITE. OUR CONCERN IS THAT THE DEVELOPER MAY OPT FOR A "SELECTIVE BIDDING" PROCESS VERUS AN OPEN-COMPETITIVE BIDDING PROCESS. IN A SELECTIVE BIDDING PROCESS, THE DEVELOPER SOLICITS BIDS FROM A FEW INVITED BIDDERS OF HIS CHOOSING. AN ADVERTISED OPEN COMPETITIVE BIDDING PROCESS ASSURES ALL COMPETENT CON- TRACTORS OF AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY TO BE SELECTED FOR THE PROJ- ECT. IT IS THIS PROCESS THAT IS UTILIZED BY ALL PUBLIC WORRS AND MOST LARGE CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS. WHILE THERE IS NOTHING ILLEGAL ABOUT A SELECTIVE BIDDING PROCESS, WE FEEL IT INAPPROPRIATE FOR A PROJECT FUNDED BY PUBLIC MONIES TO BE AWARDED BY A PROCESS WHICH MAY TEND TO DISCRIMINATE AGAINST ANY SEGMENT OF THE COMMUNITY. BE THESE MONIES APPROPRIATED FROM GENERAL FUNDS, REVENUE BONDS, OR GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS. THAT IS WHY WE ARE REQUESTING THAT ROANOKE COUNTY MAKE THEIR PARTICIPATION IN THIS PROJECT CONDITIONAL UPON THE UTILIZATION OF AN ADVERTISED OPEN-BID PROCESS BY THE DEVELOPER. SOUTHWESTERN VIRGINIA BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION TRADES COUNCIL AFFILIATED WITH BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION TRADE8 DEPT. A., F. L • Q 1. O. 24 WELlB AVENUE, N. E. •' DIAL 344-3036 - 306.3401 - ~'~ ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24016 .~ PAGE 2 CONTINUED., WE FEEL A COMPETITIVE BID PROCESS WOULD ASSURE THE COUNTY OF THE HIGHEST QUALITY CONSTRUCTION AVAILABLE AT THE MOST COM- PETITIVE PRICE. IT WOULD ALSO BE MORE ASSURANCE TO LOCAL WORKERS AND SUPPLIERS OF AN~EQUAL OPPORTUNITY TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS PROJECT. THE PERILS OF GIVING THE DEVELOPER FREE REIN ARE EASILY IL- LUSTRATED BY ,THE DOMINION TOWER PROJECT. THE DEVELOPER, FAISON & ASSOC., OF CHARLOTTE, N.C. ANNOUNCED THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR, F.N. THOMPSON, OF CHARLOTTE, N.C., TWO L2) DAYS AFTER THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVED IT'S PARTICIPATION IN THE PROJECT TO THE TUNE OF 11 MILLION DOLLARS. WITHIN DAYS, VARIOUS SUB-CONTRACTORS CONTACTING F.N. THOMPSON WERE TOLD THAT SEVERAL SUB-CONTRACTS HAD ALREADY BEEN NEGOTIATED. OUR MEMBERS WERE EFFECTIVELY SHUT OUT OF THE PROJECT. SO, NOW WE HAVE A MAJOR CONSTRUCTION PROJECT, PAYING LOCAL TAXPAYER'S MONEY TO OUT-OF-STATE SUPPLIERS AND CONTRACTORS WHO FOR THE MOST PART, UTILIZE THEIR OWN MIGRANT WORK FORCE. AN OPEN BIDDING PROCESS CANNOT GUARANTEE TH1I,T THE END RESULT WILL NOT BE THE SAME ON THE HOTEL ROANOKE PROJECT, ONLY ADDI- TIONAL PREQUAI,IFICATIONS OF THE CONTRACTORS CAN GUARD AGAINST THIS ABUSE, BUT WE ARE CONFIDENT THAT GIVEN A FAIR AND EQUAL OPPORTUNITY WE CAN STRIVE TO SECURE THIS WORK FOR LOCAL WORK- ERS. SOUTHWESTERN VIRGINIA BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION TRADES COUNCIL AfF11JATED WITH BUILDING AND CON8TRUCTION TRADE8 DEPT. A. F. L ' C. 1. O. 24 WELL8 AVENUE, N. E. • DIAL 944-3036 - 306.3W7 - ~"~~ ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 2A016 ~~- ' ALL SUCCESSFUL BIDDERS AND THEIR SUB-CONTRACTORS COMPLY WITH THE FOLLOWING: 1. Show reasonable effort to utilize the regional work force. 2. A state-certified Apprenticeship or training program. 3. Proof of experience in the particular type of construction and have adequate administrative and logistic capabilities to perform the con- tract~d work. '~. 4. Proof of up-to-date tax payments, licensee, (Unemployment Compensation, Social Security, Federal, State and Local Taxes). 5. A b,onafided Pension Program adhering to all ERISA guidelines. 6. A bonafided Health Insurance Plan with Em- ployer contributions. 7. A Federal I.D. number, for all bidders and their sub-contractors. 8. Be financially sound. 9. Identify themaelf as an independent company, if a subsidiary, then its parent company and all subsidiaries of its own. 10. An established grievance procedure to resolve any problems which may arise between the Em- ployer and the Employees. 11. Any contractor found to be in violation or debarred from bidding on any other public funded work will be disqualified. ~' / COUNTY OF ROANORE, VIRGINIA CAPITAL FUND UNAPPROPRIATED BALANCE 9,608 Unaudited Beginning Balance at July 1, 1990 $ Balance as of August 28, 1990 Submitted by ~C.6/n~ ~ • ~~ Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance $ 9,608 N ~'.~,+ COUNTY OF ROANORE~ VIRGINIA GENERAL FUND UNAPPROPRIATED BALANCE Amount Unaudited Balance at July 1, 1990 $2,653,756 Balance as of August 28, 1990 $2.653.756 S/u~bmitted by '~V-(.4~m2~ Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance ~~_ COIINTY OF ROANORE, VIRGINIA RESERVE FOR BOARD CONTINGENCY Beginning Balance at July 1, 1990 $ 50,000 Balance as of August 28, 1990 $ 50,000 Submitted by `/•-1 l.Cc/~~ ~ ~ ~cy~f Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance ACTION ~ ITEM NUMBER~L AT A REGULAR MEELDNAT THEHROANO E COUNTYEADMINISTRATIONCENTER COUNTY, VIRGINIA H MEETING DATE: August 28, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: Accounts Paid - July 1990 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUNIl~IARY OF INFORMATION: $3,167,364.72 Payments to Vendors: Payroll: 7/6/90 $ 429,195.49 868.880.64 6/22/90 438,880.64 $4,036.245.36 A detailed listing of the payments is on file with the Clerk to the Board of Supervisors. SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED: ~c~ ~'~"~ Elmer C. Hodge Diane D. Hyatt County Administrator Director of Finance --------------- ------------------------ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs Approved ( ) Motion by: Edd Denied ( ) y Johnson Received ( ) McGraw Referred ( ) Nickens To Robers MEMORANDUM DATE: August 27, 1990 TO: Roano/~e Coupt}r Bo~rd of Supervisors FROM: Elmer C. Hodge, Jr. County Administrator RE: State Budget Reductions Attached for your consideration are the staff recommendations for the mid-year budget adjustments to accommodate the reduction in state funds. These recommendations have been requested by the Board and reflect to the best of our ability the priorities you have set. As is the case with other localities, we do not know the full impact of the Governor's reductions at this time. We do expect these cuts to be approximately $750,000 this year and $1,500,000 next year. A report from the Virginia Municipal League is attached for your information. I do not believe that we can wait any longer to make the necessary adjustments to our operating budgets. Dr. Wilson, the Management Team and I have prepared these recommendations for you in an effort to preserve the delivery of services to our citizens and to keep employee morale at its best. We are recommending that funds in these amounts be reserved in the County and School Budgets until further information is received from the State. Please remember that there are no new sources of revenue which we can use, as they have been committed to start up costs for RMG, should the consolidation referendum pass. First, let me say that Roanoke County is prepared for these budget reductions even though they will certainly be untimely and difficult. Over the years, we have increased our contingency reserves for emergencies such as these, and those reserves will help us now. 1 Significantly, this Interim Budget addresses not just this fiscal year but the next as well, since the greatest reduction in funds will occur in 1991-92. If there is a way to characterize our approach, it is to 'Tighten our Belts and Stay the Course". We have already begun to initiate measures to reduce costs. For example, the Police, Fire and Parks & Recreation Departments have begun programs to use less gasoline or to use lower, less expensive, grades. All departments have been asked to prioritize purchases and reduce out-of-town travel. FUND BALANCE While the audit is not yet complete, we do anticipate a favorable addition to fund balance from the past year. While these reserve funds should be used only for one time expenditures or as transition occurs to other revenue sources, I can recommend using up to $1.5 million of these funds for this and next year's budget. I do not recommend using any more, as that would reduce the fund balance to below 5% of our general fund revenues. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT The Board has also placed a high priority on Economic Development and I am asking that you set aside $1.3 million to be used for that this year. In addition, we have learned that, together with Botetourt County, we will have to share the cost of the industrial access road for a project in the Botetourt/Roanoke County Industrial Park, because the company has delayed construction one year. Our share of this will be $130,000 this year. DRAINAGE The current budget contains $200,000 for drainage programs which the staff will be unable to begin during the fiscal year. I am recommending that we use this amount to help meet the current reductions, and budget this again for FY 1991-92. BOND ISSUE The Board may want to delay the proposed bond issue for general improvements by one year until we can determine the state of the economy. HIGHWAY PROJECTS I also recommend that we delay accepting the highway revenue sharing grant of $424,000 until the State determines what reductions may be made to the six-year secondary highway plan. Already, we are receiving notices of possible reductions in grants. 2 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS Employee benefits are a top priority and we should reserve $400,000 from the year end operations for the second phase of the market survey as we promised the employees we would. EXPLORE AND HOTEL ROANOKE I am not yet certain of the method of our involvement in the Explore and the Virginia Tech/Hotel Roanoke projects, but we should support both, if at all possible. Both projects are very important to the entire region. We welcome your input regarding the budget reductions and reserves. I hope to get a consensus during our work session, but it may be necessary to have a subsequent work session to finalize this Interim Budget. We are in a strong financial position, and will be able to meet the needs of the citizens of Roanoke County. 3 COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA MID-YEAR BUDGET REPORT AUGUST 28, 1990 GOAL.• * To Accommodate the State Budget Shortfall with the Least Impact on Services to the Citizens of Roanoke County this Year and in the Future. GUIDELINES: * Would Not Recommend Cutting Staff Salaries. * Would Not Recommend Laying Off Staff. * Would Not Recommend Raising Real Estate or Personal Property Taxes. * Would Not Recommend Reducing Fund Balance Below 5°~. * Would Recommend Living Within Our Means and Existing Tax Rates. 4 COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA ESTIMATED LOSS IN STATE FUNDING AUGUST 28, 1990 LOSS CATEGORY: FY 1990-91 FY 1991-92 Compensation Board Salary Increases Recordation Tax Enhancement Schools-SOQ, Sales Tax, Duty Free Lunch Program Potential Loss $ 60,000 157,000 533.000 $ 750,000 $1,500,000 NOTE: This is the amount of the State Revenue Shortfall known to date. Additional information will be released on September 14, 1990. 5 COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA CONTINGENCY PLAN FOR LOSS IN STATE FUNDING AUGUST 28, 1990 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S PROPOSED EXPENDITURE REDUCTIONS: FY 1990-91 FY 1991-92 Delay Peer Review $ 10,000 Reduce the Number of Street Lights 20,000 Installed Eliminate the FY 1990-91 Funding of the 200,000 Drainage Program Eliminate the I-81 Corridor Study 15,000 Decline the Historical Grant 15,000 Delay the Use of the Police Contingency 132,000 Reduction in School Expenditures 157,000 Hold Vacant Five Positions 118,000 Reserve Unappropriated Fund Balance 83,000 1,500,000 Potential Expenditure Reductions $ 750,000 $1,500,000 6 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ N ~j ~ ~ cD~N ¢_ Z J O W LL!=~ O j^ T Z U N 0 ~ V O O Q O U O O O O O Q O to oo O ~S~ T O O ~ g O N 8 r X88 ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ 8 S8 g~ O O O O O O 0 O O ~ '')M0 0 OC M ~ ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0= O O O O O O O V 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 OO~OO~t00Q M~NCO~OM~ T 7 ~ O m ~ ~ a m ... ~ ~ ~ .. ' C3 O ,_, L C m ~ ~ ~ L ~ a~ ~Oa°[ n ~ ~ O O m ~ ~ m ~ > ~ c ~U ~ ~ C ~ ~ :.: ~ D m V U O Q ~ ~ m ~ r... ii ' ' ~ i a o~ ~ ~ ~ E p O a H ~ v to m >, i- c ~~ ` - 3 ~ ~ _ U U O WQa.»C3 ti a. U T O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0~ 0 0 0 0 T- tri ~ CV r m L N (6 O } m m N ~ v, E c ~ ^ ~ > ~ m -o ~ a O o ~ p ~. ~ m +~ ` U m m ~ L oaU > ; v 0 U Z a rn N O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ J c~ ~ m Z ~ ~~° ~~ iV p ~ O m N Z t O ~ C 0 0 a: D F- . 0 7 7 COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA SOURCES OF ADDITIONAL REVENUES AUGUST 28, 1990 REVENUE CATEGORY: Amusement Tax $ 50,000 Cigarette Tax 225,000 Transient Occupancy Tax 150.000 425 000 NOTES: 1. The above new revenue estimates are calculated for a twelve month period. 2. These suggested new sources of revenue have already been committed as a funding source for the Roanoke Metropolitan Government. 3. Both the Cigarette Tax and the enhancement of the Transient Occupancy Tax will require action by the General Assembly. s COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA SUMMARY OF UNAPPROPRIATED FUND BALANCE AUGUST 28, 1990 Unaudited Fund Balance at June 30, 1990 Budgeted Addition to Fund Balance Economic Development Joint Industrial Access Project with Botetourt County Reserve for Current State Funding Losses Reserve for Future State Funding Losses Reserve for Salary Survey Projected New Fund Balance After Reserves General Amount Fund $5,153,756 8.2% 500.000 $5,653,756 8.3% 1,300,000 1.9% 130,000 0.2% 83,000 0.1 1,500,000 2.2% 400,000 0.6% $2,240,756 3.3% NOTE: The County Administrator does not recommend reducing the Unappropriated Fund Balance below the level of 5% of General Fund Expenditures for FY 1990-91. 9 ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: August 28, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: Work Session on State Budget Shortfall COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUNII~IARY OF INFORMATION A work session has been set this afternoon to present staff recommendations to address the affect, of the projected state budget shortfall on Roanoke County in the 1990-91 budget and 1991-92 budget. After discussing various budget options with individual board members, I find there is a need to resolve this as a team, and have therefore placed this work session on the agenda. School Superintendent Bayes Wilson and I are working jointly to address the anticipated shortfall in this year's state budget, and we hope to have recommendations for next year's budget as well. '.~ 1 ~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator -------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied ( 1 Eddy Received ( ) Johnson Referred ( ) McGraw Nickens To ( ) Robers :~~ ~.. ,~. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 28, 1990 RESOLUTION 82890=g CERTIFYING EXECUTIVE MEETING WAS HELD IN CONFORMITY WITH THE CODE OF VIRGINIA WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia has convened an executive meeting on this date pursuant to an affirmative recorded vote and in accordance with the provisions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and WHEREAS, Section 2.1-344.1 of the Code of Virginia requires a certification by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that such executive meeting was conducted in conformity ;ai.th Virginia law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby certifies that, to the best of each members knowledge: 1. Only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements by Virginia law were discussed in the executive meeting which this certification resolution applies, and 2. Only such public business matters as were identified in the motion convening the executive meeting were heard, discussed or considered by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. On mati.on of Supervisor Nickens, and carried by the following recorded vote: ' AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisors McGraw, Johnson A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors 8/30/90 CC: File Executive Session File ACTION # ITEM NUMBERG~ ~~ ~0 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANORE OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: August 28, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: Public Hearing and First reading of thelocatednon requesting a vacation of a 15 foot Drainage Easement, the west property line of Lot 11, Cave Spring Magisteri u District. recorded in Plat Book 5, Page 82, COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: and Martha Garrett, have requested that The petitioners, Jerry 15 foot Drainage the Board of Supervisors vacate the existin ur ose. Easement, by Ordinance, because it serves no p p BACKGROUND Franklin Investors, Inc., constructed and put to In 1963, record the f first section of Pthe outlet of tithe storm sewers system construction of Verona Trail, was located outside of the Drainage Easement. The Department of Engineering, as a part of Roanoke County's drainage maintenance program, corrected the Garrett's problem and in return, was granted a Drainage Easement to cover the natural drainage course. Therefore, there being no further need for the existhat Drainage Easement, Jerry and Martha Garrett are requesting the Easement, described above, and shown on the attached map, be vacated. 890 - ~ SUMMARY OF INFORMATION Roanoke County is requesting that the described Ease C de of vacated in accordance with Chapber the adoption 1 f 2the)~attached Virginia, 1950, as amended, y Ordinance. The Departments of Utility and Engineering, and the Virginia Department of Tran op osed vacations commented that they have no objection to the pr p The Public Hearing and the First Reading of the Ordinance is scheduled for August 28, 1990; Second Reading is scheduled for September 11, 1990. FISCAL IMPACT: ALTERNATIVES: STAFF RECOMMENDATION The County staff recommends adopt the proposed Ordinance to Easement. RESPECTFULLY SUB TIED BY: ~~~~ ~~ Arnold Covey Development and Inspections Director ~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ----- ----------------- - ---------------- VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: Denied ( ) Received ( ) Ref erred To that the Board of supervisors vacate the referenced Drainage APPROVED BY: ACTION No yes Abs Eddy Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers Map showing 15 foot Drainage Easement located west COMMUNI7YSBRVICBS property line of Lot 11, Block 3, Penn Forest AND DBVBLOPMBNT Subdivision . ~3 ~o ~ / AT A REGULAR MEETING OF TROANOKEDCOUNTYPADMINISTRATIONACENTER ONTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE 1990 TUESDAY, AUGUST 28, ORDINANCE VACATING A 15-FOOT DRAINAGE EASEMENT LOCATED ON THE WEST P CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICTENN FOREST SUBDIVISION, WHEREAS, Jerry Garrett and Martha Garrett have requested that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia vacate a 15- foot drainage easement located on the west property line of Lot 11, Block 3, Penn Forest Subdivision, Cave Spring Magisterial District; and WHEREAS, Section 15.1-482 (b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, requires that such action be accomplished by the adoption of an ordinance by the governing body; and, WHEREAS, notice has been given as required by Section 15.1- 431 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and a public hearing and first reading of this ordinance was held on August 28, 1990; and the second reading of this ordinance was held on September 11, 1990. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That a 15-foot drainage easement located on Lot 11, Block 3, Penn Forest Subdivision (P.B. 5, page 82), Cave Spring Magister- ial District, be, and hereby is, vacated pursuant to Section 15.1- 482(b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended; and, 2. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. 89a 3. That Jerry Garrett -and Martha Garrett shall record a certified copy of this ordinance with the Clerk of the Circuit Court and shall pay all fees required to accomplish this transac- tion. ACTION # ITEM NUMBER ~~`~ ~'~'` AT A REGULAR MEETINGTOTHEHROANORE COUNTYEADMINISTRp,TION CENTER COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD A MEETING DATE: August 28, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: Public Hearing and the First Reading of the Ordinance requesting a vacation of a 20 foot Drainage Easement, shown on the resubdivision of Tract 3, Soutve S ring Magister ial Districtcorded in Plat Book 10, Page 163, Ca p COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Gorman R. Howell and Sidney Maupin, are The petitioners, requesting the Board of Supervisors s o th tt the Easement 2can obe Drainage Easement, by Ordinance, relocated. BACKGROUND Gorman Howell and Sidney developing the remaining 5.464 Industrial Park into 6 lots. Maupin are in the process of acres of Tract 3 of Southwest In order to improve the marketability of the proposed Lot 1 Phase II, the petitioners are of Southwest Industrial Park, requesting that the existing Easement be vacated and relocated on the proposed common lot linphaseLIIs(refer to attached map)map of Southwest Industrial Park, SUMMARY OF INFORMATION Roanoke County is requesting that the described EasemenCode vacated in accordance wit am nded,r bye adoption- of the (attached of Virginia, 1950, as Ordinance. The Departments of Engineering and Utility and the Virginia Department of Transposedtvacation on thenfollowing Condit ions•no objection to the prop S9o -,~ 1. That the existing Drainage Easement be vacated, upon the recordation of the subdivision Plat of Southwest Industrial Park, Phase II. The Public Hearing and First Reading of the Ordinance is 1990 and the Second Reading of the scheduled for August 28, Ordinance is scheduled for September 11, 1990. FISCAL IMPACT: ALTERNATIVES: STAFF RECOMMENDATION The County staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors adopt the proposed Ordinance to vacate the re~era~a~ao Drof nthe Easement and instruct the County Attorney in p P Ordinance, that the 20 foot Drainage Easement to be vacated upon the recordation of the subdivision Plat of Southwest Industrial Park, Phase II. PECTFULLY SUBMITTED BY: i ,,,~,~ ,. nold Covey Development and Inspections Director APPROVED BY: ~C ~" Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator --------------------------------- VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: Denied ( ) Received ( ) Ref erred To ACTION No yes Abs Eddy Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers J WI >wcV G ~n ~, . c by SW~~'RNO~ a ~ YIF ~^\4 "~b ~ p%~ ",.~i-- ~fQ SL-EC{~% MILLS ~ ~O'I~ 2 -~ 'i,~ ~ 2 V NMOyu~~r49 'F7 !~v ~i~ t... > ~ l 1-1 M,gpj~~ W N ~QU -~rOa IC -(^ F~ ~ / ~P,pN el'b42~CsTV~ 4,' / ~ NiA1N D~. ~ rCrayN ~y ~'~~ -.~- C ~ KN 1 ~ ~ NrQ _ _ __, ~. ~~ _ - `,':~~ _. - `I ....C ~ _ ~ BUCK MWIW1 AUN VVV S . cia~~~ ~ - `~, • ~ EFNVOOD PLANTATION PIPE LINE ~~~~~__.• _ - VICINITY MAP ~ °, V NORTB ~...... ~o~-/ErJ Q-~ /3tocK A /l~.~oon~c~R~t 5uN0/v/~/O~c/ P. /3. G Pc. B/ nor zy ~ ,cor 30 _,_- --=~gAleIAGE E3MT it//f%0~ 3E _O sB. ~t. t _-.- ,-~- I~ t: ~ I~ ~I it ~ I 1 ~I ~~......- ~l ~ N I R1_r ~I SOT ~~~~I ~~ , ~`'o~°i r...-,..., ~t to he Map showing zu rooL u~ a I IlQyc ~~~~"----- COMMUNITYSEE~'~CES vacated and relocated on proposed Plat of Southwest AND DEVELOPMENT Industrial Park , Phase I I . NOTE: IRON P-^-`~ MARK AIL- GORh1F SHov-~N 1-iEQEUtJ UNtrcSS OTNERW'~~ N OT EO. I '~toc,c 'G .. 2 oti~p ~ I z s~~r~°'v .~. ,oE,. I ~ I 3 f I 1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THEO~BOOARDCOUNTYPADMINISTRATIONACENTER ONTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT TTUESDAY, AUGUST 28, 1990 ORDINANCE VACATING AND RELOCATING A 20-FOOT DRAINAGE EASEMENT SHOWN O PLAT RCAVEDSPRINGNMAGISTERIAL DISTRICTT INDUSTRIAL PARK ~ WHEREAS, Gorman R. Howell and Sidney Maupin have requested that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia vacate a 20-foot drainage easement as shown on the resubdivision of Tract 3, Southwest Industrial Park Plat (P.B. 10, page 163), Cave Spring Magisterial District; and WHEREAS, Section 15.1-482 (b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, requires that such action be accomplished by the adoption of an ordinance by the governing body; and, WHEREAS, notice has been given as required by Section 15.1- 431 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and a public hearing and first reading of this ordinance was held on August 28, 1990; and the second reading of this ordinance was held on September 11, 1990. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That a 20-foot drainage easement shown on the resub- division of Tract 3, Southwest Industrial Park Plat (P.B. 10, page 163), Cave Spring Magisterial District, be, and hereby is, vacated and relocated to the proposed common lot line of Lots 1 and 2 as shown on the map of Phase II of the Southwest Industrial Park pursuant to Section 15.1-482(b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended; and, 2. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect ~~-, thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. 3. That Gorman R. Howell and Sidney Maupin shall record a certified copy of this ordinance with the Clerk of the Circuit Court and shall pay all fees required to accomplish this transac- tion. 3 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 28, 1990 ORDINANCE 82890-10 VACATING A 50 FOOT RIGHT- OF-WAY REFERRED TO AS ~'GOFF ROAD~~ FROM ITS INTERSECTION WITH WEBSTER DRIVE, WEST, APPROXIMATELY 197 FEET, IN THE CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, the subdivision plat for North Burlington Heights Subdivision recorded in Plat Book 3, page 59, provided for an extension of Goff Road for a distance of approximately 197 feet in a southwesterly direction for access to the "Bennett" property; and WHEREAS, with the subsequent development of the "Bennett" property as the Barrens Village Subdivision, access to this property has been provided by way of Barrens Road and Deer Branch Road thereby eliminating the need for the above referenced right- of-way; and WHEREAS, notice has been given pursuant to § 15.1-431 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, clearly describing the plat or portion thereof to be vacated and the time and place of the meeting of the Board of Supervisors at which the adoption of this ordinance would be voted upon as required by § 15.1-482 of the Code of Virginia; and WHEREAS, a first reading of the proposed ordinance was held on August 14, 1990; the second reading was held on August 28, 1990. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That a 50 foot right-of way approximately 197 feet in length extending from Webster Drive in a southwesterly direction and designated as an extension of Goff Road, as recorded in Plat Book 3, page 59, located in the Catawba Magisterial District, is hereby vacated. 2. That the County Administrator is authorized to execute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County as are necessary to accomplish the vacation of the said right-of- way, all of which shall be upon. form approved by the County Attorney. 3. That a certified copy of this ordinance of vacation shall be recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia after the time for appeal of the adoption of this ordinance has expired, or in the event of any such appeal, upon the denial of such appeal, as provided by § 15.1-482, Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended. 4. The effective date of this ordinance shall be August 28, 1990. On motion of Supervisor McGraw to approve ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Development & Inspections Terry Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning John Willey, Director, Real Estate Assessment ACTION # ITEM NUMBER ~~~ .. `~ AT A REGGINIA HELDNAT THEHROANORE COUNTYEADMINISTRATION CENTER COUNTY, VIR MEETING DATE: August 28, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: Second reading of the Ordinance requesting a vacation of a 50 foot right-of-way referred to as "Goff Road" from it's intersection with Webster Drive, west, approximately 197 feet, recorded in Plat Book 3, Page 59, Catawba Magisterial District. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The Petitioner's, Mr. Hartwell Philips and Mrs. Violet Moomaw Hull, are requesting that the Board of Supervisors vacate a portion of an unimproved right-of-way referred to as "Goff Road", as shown on the attached map. BACKGROUND Several years ago Mr. Hartwell Philips made a request to Roanoke County ,ed hisc ree uest fbecause"the Bennettt Land had not Supervisors dens q been developed. Since that date, the property to the west (Bennett Land) has been developed, referred to as Barrens Village, with access being provided by way of Barrens Road and Deer Branch Road thus eliminating the need for this portion of the right-of-way. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION Roanoke County is requesting that the described right-of Code be vacated in accordance with Chapter 11, Title 15.1-482 (b), of Virginia, 1950, as amended, by the adoption of the attached Ordinance. The Departments of Engineering and Utility have commented that they have no objection to the proposed vacation. ~Q-~ The First Reading of the Ordinance was held on August 14, 1990; Public Hearing and Second Reading is scheduled for August 28, 1990. STAFF RECOMMENDATION The County S ance to vacate the referenced right of Wayadopt the proposed Ordin SPECTFULLY SUBMITTED BY: Arnold Covey Development and Ins ections Director APPROVED BY: ~~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ---------------- ACTION VOTE Motion by: No Yes Abs Approved ( ) Eddy Denied ( ) Johnson Received ( ) McGraw Referred Nickens To Robers __,_ r ~n M ~~_ ~__._... _ _~/~ ~ ._....... - - f • ...... ...~ . ~~~,,. q,,,r ~r ~`~ J ' ~~^~~ rep r~ii YICJNl77 ~IAt ~`w ~ ",,, N0~?'8 CObIJIUNJTYSBRVICB.S Vacate a 50 foot right-of-way (Goff Road) ANDDBVBLOPJNBNT approximately 197 feet, recorded in Plat Book 3, Page 59 '~ -,~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 28, 1990 ORDINANCE VACATING A 50 FOOT RIGHT-OF-WAY REFERRED TO AS "GOFF ROAD" FROM ITS INTERSECTION WITH WEBSTER DRIVE, WEST, APPROXIMATELY 197 FEET, IN THE CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, the subdivision plat for North Burlington Heights Subdivision recorded in Plat Book 3, page 59, provided for an extension of Goff Road for a distance of approximately 197 feet in a southwesterly direction for access to the "Bennett" property; and WHEREAS, with the subsequent development of the "Bennett" property as the Barrens Village Subdivision, access to this property has been provided by way of Barrens Road and Deer Branch Road thereby eliminating the need for the above referenced right- of-way; and WHEREAS, notice has been given pursuant to § 15.1-431 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, clearly describing the plat or portion thereof to be vacated and the time and place of the meeting of the Board of Supervisors at which the adoption of this ordinance would be voted upon as required by § 15.1-482 of the Code of Virginia; and WHEREAS, a first reading of the proposed ordinance was held on August 14, 1990; the second reading was held on August 28, 1990. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That a 50 foot right-of way approximately 197 feet in length extending from Webster Drive in a southwesterly direction } ~~~ `.~ and designated as an extension of Goff Road, as recorded in Plat Book 3, page 59, located in the Catawba Magisterial District, is hereby vacated. 2. That the County Administrator is authorized to execute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County as are necessary to accomplish the vacation of the said right-of- way, all of which shall be upon form approved by the County Attorney. 3. That a certified copy of this ordinance of vacation shall be recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia after the time for appeal of the adoption of this ordinance has expired, or in the event of any such appeal, upon the denial of such appeal, as provided by § 15.1-482, Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended. 4. The effective date of this ordinance shall be August 28, 1990. ~ t S AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, AUGUST 28, 1990 ORDINANCE 828gp-11 TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A 1.78 ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF STARREY ROAD NORTH OF ITS INTERSECTION WITH BUCK MOUNTAIN ROAD (TAX MAP NOS. 87.18-1-38 AND 87.18-1-41) IN THE CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF R- 1 TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF B-1 WITH CONDITIONS UPON THE APPLICATION OF THOMAS SCARCE WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on August 14, 1990, and the second reading and public hearing was held August 28, 1990; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on August 7, 1990; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1• That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing 1.78 acre, as described herein, and located on the west side of Starkey Road north of its intersection with Buck Mountain Road, (Tax Map Numbers 87.18-1-38 and 87.18-1-41) in the Cave Spring Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of R-1, Single Family Residential District, to the zoning classification of B-1, Office District. 2• That this action is taken upon the application of Thomas Scarce. 3• That the owner has voluntarily proffered in writing the following conditions which the Board of Supervisors hereby accepts: 1) The footprint of the house will not be expanded. 2) The location of the parking area required for the office zoning will be in substantial conformity with the site plan prepared by Dickson Architects, dated May 30, 1990. 3) There will be no residential or institutional use of the property following expiration of the current residential leases. 4) Type C screening and buffering will be located where required by the County staff. 4. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: BEGINNING at a point in the center of the public road leading from Starkey to Roanoke at l; thence passing the north gate post on the westline of said road at 15 feet and passing a monument planted in the ground at 16 feet from said starting point in the middle of the road to another monument at 2 ; thence N . 2 3 deg . 4 5' E . 154. 5 feet to another monument at 3; thence S. 66 deg. 15' E. 282 feet passing the west line of said road at 15 feet from its center to the center of said road at 4; thence along the center of said road, S. 23 deg. 45' W. 154.5 feet to the Place of Beginning, and containing one (1) acre as surveyed by George L. Poague, Surveyor, November 3, 1971, as shown on plat recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, in Deed Book 87, at page 526. BEGINNING at an iron pin set on the westerly side of Starkey Road, S.W. (known as Route 904), formerly Virginia Route No. 419 corner to the property now or formerly owned by Lewis B. Hunter (D.B. 300, page 117); thence with westerly side of Route 904, S. 24 deg. 00' W. passing a highway monument at 98.1 feet a total distance of 114.8 feet to an iron pin found in a fence line dividing Lots 4 and 5; thence with said dividing line, N. 70 deg. 45' W. 304.0 feet to an iron pin set in the line of property now or formerly owned by Ray Douthat, et ux. (D.B. 311, page 6); thence with the line of Douthat, N. 5 deg. 00' W. 97.5 feet to an iron pin set on the line of Hunter said point being near the bank of a dry branch; thence with line of Hunter and following generally the course of the dry branch, S. 74 deg. 50' E. 354.9 feet to an iron pin set being the Place of Beginning, and being Lot 5, containing 0.78 acres as shown on survey for Frederick E. Redford, Jr. and Debbie S. Redford, prepared by T. P. Parker & Son, Engineers & Surveyors, Ltd., dated March 17, 1986. ., 5. That the effective date of this ordinance shall be August 28, 1990. On motion of Supervisor Robers to approve ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Brenda J. Hol on, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Development & Inspections Terry Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning John Willey, Director, Real Estate Assessment ~~ PETITIONER: THOMAS SCARCE CASE NUMBER: 22-8/9~ Planning Commission Hearing Date: August 7, 1990 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: August 28, 1990 A. REQUEST Petition of Thomas Scar~oe Bclrfornoffice useslslocatednongthe west of 1.78 acres from R-1 side of Starkey Road north of its intersection with Buck Mountain Road, Cave Spring Magisterial District. B. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION Paul Smith stated his objection to office uses in a residential area; also additional offices are not needed in this area. C. SIGNIFICANT IMPACT FACTORS None. D. PROFFERED CONDITIONS 1) The footprint of the house will not be expanded. 2) The location of the parking area required for the office zoning wi11D b kson substantial conformity with the site plan prepared by Architects, dated May 30, 1990. 3) There will be no residential or institutional use of the property following expiration of the current residential leases. 4) Type C screening and buffering will be located where required by the County staff. E. COMMISSIONER'S MOTION, VOTE AND REASON Mr. Witt moved to appro~hetmotionuenotinghthatftheecomprehensive Mr. Winstead supported planning process undertaken in 1985-86 placed this area in a core land use category and that the Commission has an oblig ed toThe consistent in the land use determinants that are app motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES• Winstead, Witt, Robinson, Gordon NAYS: None ABSENT: Massey F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE None. ~,~ Concept Plan T/ Vicinity Map G. ATTACHMENTS: ~ Staff Report Other Terrance Harington, S etary Roanoke County Planni g Commission 1 890 - y STAFF REPORT CAS$ NUMBER: 22-8/90 REVTBWED BY: Janet Scheid 1. NATURE OF REQUEST PETITIONER: Thomas Scarce DATE: August 7, 1990 a. Conditional request to rezone two parcels of land from Residential, R-1 to Business, B-1 for the stated purpose of utilizing single-family residences as offices. b. Attached concept plans and vicinity map describe the projects in more detail. 2. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS a. The B-1 zoning district permits a wide variety of office uses in addition to two-family and multi-family dwellings, churches, schools, libraries, playgrounds, and parks. Petitioner has indicated in the letter of application that he will limit use to offices, but has not yet formally proffered this. b. VDOT commercial entrance permit required. c. Site plan reviews will be required to ensure compliance with all County regulations. 3. SITE CHARACTERISTICS a. Topography: Both sites are relatively flat. b. Ground Cover: Both sites have existing dwellings and are covered in grass with several deciduous trees. 4. AREA CHARACTERISTICS a. Future Growth Priority: Situated within the Cave Spring Community Planning Area. Designated as a stable growth area and is currently receiving urban services. b. General area: Developed with single- and multi-family residences, institutional and office uses, and some limited general retail uses. 5. LAND USE IMPACT ASSESSMENT Rating: Rate each factor according to the impact of the proposed action. Use a scale of 1 through 5. 1 = positive impact, 2 = negligible impact, 3 = manageable impact, 4 = disruptive impact, 5 = severe impact, and N/A = not applicable. 2 RATING FACTOR 3 3 3 COMMENTS ~ ~~~ LAND USE COMPATIBILITY a. Comprehensive Plan: 1985 Comprehensive Development Plan has placed this area within a Core land use category. Office uses are encouraged within this category. -Low and middle density residential, which are allowed in the B-1 zoning district, are prohibited and discouraged, respect- ively. Middle-high density residential development is of moderate compatibility. The development of offices would be consistent with Policy C-1 - encourage the development of intensive, mixed-use urban development in designated core areas. The use of these houses are two-family (duplex) residences would not be consistent with Policy C-1. Development of offices would also be consistent with Policy C-4 - coordinate the design of commercial sites with regard to minimum number of vehicular access points; building size and design should complement adjacent buildings and through ordinance enforcement, Policy C-5 - provide separation, screening and buffering along borders with less intensive development. This area is not served by an arterial or higher grade street so does not conform with Policy C-2. b. Surrounding Land: Single- and multi-family residential and office uses on a heavily travelled secondary road. c. Neighboring Area: Residential, office and limited general retail. 3 d. Site Layout: Petitioner has proffered to not expand the footprint of the two houses and the location of parking will be in substantial conformity with the site plan dated May 30, 1990. 3 e. Architecture: Single-family residences are not consistent with the Core land use category. On these two sites, they are complementary to the surrounding residential uses. Existing structures to be utilized with no expansion. 3 f. Screening and Landscape: Per ordinance. Not proffered. 3 g. Amenities: Parking location is proffered. 3 h. Natural Features: None TRAFFIC 2 i. Street Capacities: The 1986 ADT on this segment of Starkey Road was 3,764. Five accidents occurred on the quarter mile segment of Starkey Road between Arthur Street (VA 717) and Buck Mountain Road (VA 679). Office uses will generate fewer than 25 vehicle trip ends per day, per site. 3 j. Circulation: Adequate. Will have to meet all County requirements for fire and rescue services. UTILITIES 2 k. Water: Adequate source and distribution. 2 1. Sewer: Adequate treatment and transmission. 3 DRAINAGE 2 m. Basin: Back Creek sub-basin. ~:., ,sit ~ ~ / P 3 n. Floodplain: Proposed site is not located within a flood hazard area as designated by FEMA. However, the Director of beesubmect to flooding and both sit sr may requireeony may j site stormwater management. PUBLIC SERVICES 2 0. Fire Protection: Within established service standard. 2 p. Rescue: Within established service standard. N/A q. Parks and Recreation: N/A r. School: TAX BASE 2 s. -Land and Improvement Value: -Taxable Gross Sales/Year: -Total Employees: -Total revenue to the County/Year: Approximately $1,200 ENVIRONMENT 2 t. Air: 2 u. Water: 2 v. Soils: 2 w. Noise: 2 x. Signage: In accordance with sign ordinance. 6. PLAN CONSISTENCY This area is designated as Core. Office uses are consistent with the land use plan and with Policies C-1, C-4, and C-5. The proposal is not consistent with Policy C-2. 7. STAFF EVALUATION a. Strengths: 1) Petition is consistent with the land use plan and Policies C-1, C-4, and C-5. 2) Petitioner has proffered to not enlarge the footprint of either residence. 3) Petit- ioner has proffered the location of parking on both sites. b. Weaknesses: 1) Petition is inconsistent with Policy C-2 due to its location on a secondary road. 2) Petitioner has not proffered to exclude residential and institutional uses. 3) Petitioner has not proffered screening and buffering. c. Proffers Suggested: 1) Proffer to exclude residential and institutional uses. 2) Proffer Type C screening and buffering, where required against residential boundaries. LAW OFFICES OSTERHOl1DT, FERGl1SON, MATT, AHERON £~ AGEE ~~~ -~ A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 1919 ELECTRIC ROAD, S. W. P. O. BOX 20068 TELEPHONE CHARLES H. OSTERHOVDT 703-774 117 MICHAEL 5. FERGUSON ROANOKE, VIRGINIA FAX No. EDWARD A. MATT 2,4018 70~-771-0901 MICHAEL J. AHERON G. STEVEN AGEE MARK O. KIDO June 15, 1990 (Amended August 7, 1990) Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, Virginia 24018 Re• Rezoning of 2 parcels of land • containing a total of 1.78 acres Gentlemen: This is to advise that our firm is representing Mr. Thomas Scarce, owner of two parcels rth 1 fd i s u intersections with dBuck Starkey Road immediately no erty, located in Mountain Road in the County of Roanoke. The prop the Cave Spring MagisteriaTax Mar Nos. 87 18 1 38 and 87 18-1-41 acres and is identified as P on the Roanoke County tax maps. Each of the parcels presently has situate ureoses.a Atnthe structure which has been used for residential p p occu ied present time, the properties are either vacant or being P as landlord/tenant properties for residential purposes. My client is desirous of having the two parcels rezoned to Business District B-1 so that offices may be located thereiraisal plans to utilozieaseethe other sstruccturee out to tenants who would business and t qualify under the B-1 zoning. It is pointed out that the property immediately between the two parcels has recently been rezoned to Business District B-1. My client is willing to proffer the following conditions: 1. The footprint of the house a kin noarea required•for the 2, That the location of the p g off ice zoning would be in sass&aAssoc atesor Pi CY u der the ldatelof prepared by Dixon Architec May 30, 1990. 3. There will be no residential or institutional use of t e ~~©-~ property 4. required following expiration of the curre ;t lie be elocated ewhere Greening and buffering Type C s by the County staff. It is further pointed out that this property is designated as "core" under the County's long range land use plan and that this proposal would fit witat the mattersbelreferred to the Planning respectfully requested th Commission for its meeting on August 7thonnAugustc28thderation by the Board of Supervisors at its meeting Should there be any questions, please advise. Very truly yours, OSTERHOUDT, FERGUSON, NATT, AHERON & AGEE, P.C. c~n~- Edward A. Natt Appr d by t lan caner: G~'Y1 U~ homas Scarce EAN/dle ...., .. •~..-... r+0urn"r'r"~'/"'~! /~1~ Y=.r~Oi~~ oy~-~ V Z~IC~ 1 ~'}~ l+~ + is ~~` f F ~ ~ ~ t?7 l-?~t7+'~sA G~ 10'1 - rtY'L iL1~G O~• • ~ r l X90 -y --- - - ~ .ta~,r-.~~..o I ~~ ,~ _ _ ,: !~ o _~ - ~} ~~- 3 ~ ,~~ 4 ~ ~ .__ . . ~. ~ , . , ~~ ,. ~~ ., ~~ '~ ~ j ~ d i ' ' i i t +~; r F~ -~.~-- - rJOLLvn-t v/~.'7 t-1-~1~do7d 977a`!s'74 1 -i _ H'r'~r 11.4 ~y J-.7~I~Y14 4v~G to ~~~ w r w I I I .- t It f ~ ~t t~ ,:l I _ ~:: ~ ~~ r} ,' 1` _ ~ ~i 1' r 1 ~ ~ ~ ;O ~1 ~ 1 ~ ~ ti~ ~ a ,~ i' ~ ~O. .' ~ f 1 ~ ~ ~i ~ '~ .~ 1 i ~~ ~~ -' ~ 1i -~~ 3~.f u~~4 sr ~ t ~ ~ ~" ppii ~~ -T% n~~ K~M1 G~ ~~' ~~'d~o ~ q .~,~ 't ~ j •. ~~h/ v Q- Kw ~ _ ~~ ~/ a'" ~_ ~ ~~ ~, ~ ~ ~ ~ • ~ J ~ \'% . ~ ,`~`L~~;J -' ._. ~' ..._J - ~~~y. 50.'~CRI ~"~, ° l s«<o ~~ N _ , RTt,.._ hW ((r S- d y~ w~ Nry~ Vfy. C y _ ~ ~~ _ r, = ~ .i ego-y NORTB AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT TUESDAY AUGUST N28, AD9 IO ISTRATION CENTER, ORDINANCE TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A 1.78 ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF STARKEY ROAD NORTH OF ITS INTERSECTION WITH BUCK MOUNTAIN ROAD (TAX MAP NOS. 87.18-1-38 AND 87.18-1-41) IN THE CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF R-1 TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF B-1 WITH CONDITIONS UPON THE APPLICATION OF THOMAS SCARCE WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on August 14, 1990, and the second reading and public hearing was held August 28, 1990; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on August 7, 1990; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing 1.78 acre, as described herein, and located on the west side of Starkey Road north of its intersection with Buck Mountain Road, (Tax Map Numbers 87.18-1-38 and 87.18-1-41) in the Cave Spring Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of R-1, Single Family Residential District, to the zoning classification of B-1, Office District. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of Thomas Scarce. 3. That the owner has voluntarily proffered in writing the following conditions which the Board of Supervisors hereby accepts: ~~~-y 1) The footprint of the house will not be expanded. 2) The location of the parking area required for the office zoning will be in substantial conformity with the site plan prepared by Dickson Architects, dated May 30, 1990. 3) There will be no residential or institutional use of the property following expiration of the current residential leases. 4) Type C screening and buffering will be located where required by the County staff. 4. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: BEGINNING at a point in the center of the public road leading from Starkey to Roanoke at 1; thence passing the north gate post on the westline of said road at 15 feet and passing a monument planted in the ground at 16 feet from said starting point in the middle of the road to another monument at 2 ; thence N . 2 3 deg . 4 5' E . 154.5 15' E. feet to another monument at 3; thence S. 66 deg. 282 feet passing the west line of said road at 15 feet from its center to the center of said road 45 4W.t154C5 along the center of said road, S and3containing one (1) feet to the Place of Beginning, acre as surveyed by George L. Poague, Surveyor, November 3, 1971, as shown on plat recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, in Deed Book 87, at page 526. BEGINNING at an iron pin set on the westerly side of Starkey Road, S.W. (known as Route 904), formerly Virginia Route No. 419 corner to the property a 117)r formerly owned by Lewis B. Hunter (D.B. 300, p g 00' thence with westerly side of Route 904, S. 24 deg. W, passing a highway monument at 98.1 feet a total distance of 114.8 feet to an iron pin found in a fence line dividing Lots 4 and 5; thence with said dividing line, N. 70 deg. 45' W. 304.0 feet to an iron pin set in the line of property now or formerly owned by Ray Douthat, et ux. (D.B. 311, page 6); thence with the line of Douthat, N. 5 deg. 00' W. 97.5 feet to an iron pin set on the line of Hunter said point being near the bank of a dry branch; thence with line of Hunter and following generally the course of the dry branch, S. 74 deg. 50' E. 354.9 feet to an iron pin set being the Place of Beginning, and being Lot 5, containing 0.78 acres as shown on survey for Frederick E. Redford, Jr. and Debbie S. Redford, prepared by T. P. Parker & Son, Engineers & Surveyors, Ltd., dated March 17, 1986. 5. That the effective date of this ordinance shall be ~: ~.~ ~ .. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT TUESDAY, AUGU T N28, AD9 Io ISTRATION CENTER, DENIAL OF ORDINANCE 82890-12 TO AMEND PROFFERED CONDITIONS ON THE REZONING OF A 24.94-ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF COLONIAL AVENUE OPPOSITE OGDEN ROAD INTERSECTION IN THE CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF R-3, CONDITIONAL, TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF UPON CONDITIOICATIONDOFIOCCIDENTALpDEVELOPMENTNLTDIONS) THE APPL WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on August 14, 1990, and the second reading and public hearing was held August 28, 1990; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on August 7, 1990; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law; and WHEREAS, this property was rezoned from R-1, Single-Family Residential District, to R-3, Multi-Family Residential District with proffered conditions, in September of 1988. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: Denied on motion of Supervisor Robers, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None ' TESTE: • • • Allen, Clerk County Board of Supervisors cc: File 5~~. Arnold Co To~. S~ ~ ~ . R ~ ~pment & Inspections Terry Hari ~~~ .arming & Zoning John Wille tate Assessment From: Return ~ Keep or t°SS ~ ~~~~ FV 1. Pad7668 89a -5 PETITIONER: OCCIDENTAL DEVELOPMENT, LTD. CASE NUMBER: 25-8/90 Planning Commission Hearing Date: August 7, 1990 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: August 28, 1990 A. REQUEST Petition of Occidental Development, Ltd. to amend the proffere conditions on 24.94 acres to increase the size (numberoved,eaocated of a portion of the 264 apartment unit osite O den Road intersection, on the west side of Colonial Avenue opp g Cave Spring Magisterial District. B. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION David Courey said the arguments for approving the original concept plan presented two years ago included: no impact on schools; minimal impact on traffic; one and two-bedroom apartments constitute the highest and best use of this prop hey requeste now sbecauseu the enew as a logical argument to deny proposal is completely alien to the original plan. Mark Seiler voiced the following concerns: increased traffic on Colonial Avenue; additional apartments will worsen the problem of transient students at Green Valley which is already overcrowded. C. SIGNIFICANT IMPACT FACTORS See attached staff memorandum. D. PROFFERED CONDITIONS 1) Old Towne Road, Ashmeade Drive and Greencliff Road will not be extended beyond their present terminuses at the boundary of the referenced parcel or otherwise used for vehicular access to or from the parcel. 2) No more than eleven dwelling units per acre will be constructed on the land. No more than 264 dwelling units will be constructed in the entire development. No more than 36 dwelling units will contain as many as three bedrooms. No more than 132 other dwelling units will contain as many as two bedrooms. No dwelling unit will contain more than three bedrooms. 3) Access to petitioner's intended development within the parcel will be by a single entrance on Colonial Avenue at its intersection with Ogden Road. 4) Develop- ment of the land in this parcel will be in substantial conformity to the concept plan dated August 3, 1990 by Buford T. Lumsden & Asl°ca~ a copy of which plan has been submitted with petitioner's app tion. However, petitioner may elect to construct fewer buildings and dwelling units than depicted on the concept plan. 5) Area lighting in the immediate vicinity of adjacent residential properties will be focused toward the interior of the project to avoid unnecessary glare and distraction to neighboring residents. Freestanding light poles will not exceed 20 feet in height, and the intensity of the lighting will not exceed 2-foot candles on the ground beneath the lamp. r~9o - 5 6) No building will be constructed closer than 10e descr bedtas Georgetown Park subdivision. 7) Buffering of the typ Type C-Option 2 in the ordinance will be provided along the boundary of Georgetown Park and Greenwood Forest where existing net C Op lion t2 does not provide reasonably similar buffering. 'I'YP specifies a 25-foot buffer yard with small evergreen trees (having an ultimate height of 15 feet or greater and planted each 15 linear feet) and evergreen shrubs (having an ultimate height of 6 feet or greater, at least 18 inches at time of planting and planted each five feet) . Planting will occur as soon as feasible in tsoliduwooden construction. 8) All dumpsters will be screened by fencing and landscaping. No dumpster will be closer than 75 feet to Georgetown Park or Greenwood Forest. E. COMMISSIONER'S MOTION, VOTE AND REASON Mr. Witt said that schools may be a problem in the short run due to capacity; but in the long run, a variety of measures are available to minimize this impact including a change in attendance zorted the moved to approve the amended proffers. Mr. Winstead supp motion and said the request is not a major land use issue and there is no substantial impact on the community. Mr. Gordon said that the proposal has less of an impact on schools than single family residential developmeca~ bed w th t e followingoroll callvvoteowded schools. The motto AYES: Winstead, Witt, Robinson, Gordon NAYS: None ABSENT: Massey F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE None. G. ATTACHMENTS: V Concept Plan ~.~Vicinity Map Staff Report Other ` ,. ~,~.~ , ~- Terrance Harington, S etary Roanoke County Planni g Commission 890 - 5 1 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Jon Hartley DATE: August 3, 1990 M g M O R A N D O M RE: Petition of Occidental Development Corp to Amend the Proffered Conditions to modify the proffered conditions approved in 1988. Occidental Development is proposing to amend the proffered conditions approved by the Board of Supervisors in September, 1988 for the property located on Colonial Avenue at the end of Ogden Road (often called the Ronk property). The purpose of the amended proffers is to change the range of apartment sizes allowed by permitting up to 36 three-bedroom apartments where no three-bedroom units are allowed under the existing conditions and by increase from 118 to 132 the maximum number of two-bedroom apartments. The total number of units proposed would be unchanged by this petition. Listed below is a table comparing the existing and proposed mixture. Apartment Size 1 Bedroom 2 Bedroom 3 Bedroom Total Existing Condition 146 118 0 264 Proposed Condition 96 132 36 264 In evaluating this request, staff has focused only on those factors affected by the change in the mixture of apartments. Based on staffs evaluation this would be limited primarily to the following potential issues: Traffic: In 1988, Colonial Avenue carried approximately 11,300 average daily trips (ADT). Based on the existing configuration, staff estimated in 1988 that this project would generate approximately 1,740 ADT, based on a uniform rate per unit. When trip generation rates are adjusted for the specific mixture units existing or proposed, the estimated number of trips generated varies less than 10 ADT from the figure derived based on the uniform rate. Based on these numbers, the requested change will have no greater impact on traffic than the development scheme that has already been approved. 890 --~ 2 Schools: In terms of the impact on schools, in 1988, when the existing mixture cited above was approved, staff estimated that this project would generate approximately 17 school aged children. The requested change in the apartment units would increase the estimated number of school aged children to 52. According to school officials, Green Valley Elementary has recently added a mobile classroom for the 1990-91 school year, in order to accommodate both the regular classes and mandated special programs. Additional students between kindergarten and fifth grade could create the need for additional mobile classroom space at Green Valley in the short term. The need for building improvements at this facility has been identified, but no funds have been allocated for these improvements. It should be noted that, according to school officials, school enrollments around the County are declining, and are expected to continue to decline. For this reason, increases in the number of students that could result from this project in the short run, are less significant within the whole County system in the long run. Concept Plan: The last factor considered are the minor changes in the concept plan proffered as a condition of the original rezoning request (See Attactnnent A). The modifications proposed are the result of the changes in the mixture of apartments and are shown on Attachment B. They consist of minor increases in the building footprints of four of the nine buildings proposed. In addition, County parking standards require 25 additional parking spaces which have been reflected in the revised concept plan. Finally, the orientation of some of the buildings has been shifted slightly, providing even more space between the apartment buildings and adjoining residents. Beyond the changes described above, staff has suggested and the petitioner has agreed tm eliminate the existing proffered conditions related to signage and storm water management. Since this project was approved in September, 1988, Roanoke County has adopted new regulations dealing with signage and storm water management. These new regulations represent the community standard and are more restrictive in almost all cases than those specific conditions previously proffered. To avoid any conflicts and apply these new standards uniformly, staff has recommended and the petitioner has agreed to eliminate these two conditions. The petitioner has also deleted the previously approved proffer regarding an archeological survey of the property and removal of the historic structures from the property, since these items have already been completed. ill other proffered conditions associated with the original project will Tema trance afrom• ColonialcAvees th ghtingalbuffer yardstand access to obe en screening and buffering requirements. Boo -5 VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY A 24.94 acre parcel of land generally) located on the western side of ) Colonial Avenue, S.W. opposite the ) intersection of Ogden Road within ) the Cave Spring Magisterial District,) being parcel ~~ 77.11-1-55 in the Roanoke County Tax Records. ) PROFFER OF CONDITIONS June 22, 1990 Occidental Development, Ltd. Revised: July 5, 1990 Revised: August 7, 1990 TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY: Being in accord with Sec. 15.1-491.1 et set. of the Code of Virginia and Sec. 21-105E of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance, the Petitioner Occidental Development, Ltd. hereby voluntarily proffers to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia the following conditions to the rezoning of the above-referenced parcel of land. This proffer of conditions supersedes all proffered conditions previously tendered by the Petitioner. 1. Old Towne Road, Ashmeade Drive and Greencliff Road will not be extended beyond their present terminuses at the boundary of the referenced parcel or otherwise used for vehicular access to or from the parcel. 2. No more than eleven dwelling units per acre will be constructed on the land. No more than two hundred sixty-four dwelling units will be constructed in the entire development. ~~~ No more than thirty-six dwelling units will contain as many as .~n~w.~fl~-+~~n < n ~~i~~~ three bedrooms. No more than one hundred thirty-two other dwel ing units will contain as many as two bedrooms. No dwelling unit ~D-5 will contain more than three bedrooms. 3. Access to Petitioner's intended development within the parcel will be by a single entrance on Colonial Avenue at its intersection with Ogden Road, S.W. 4. Development of the land in this parcel will be in substantial conformity to the concept plan dated August 3, 1990 by Buford T. Lumsden & Associates, P.C., a copy of which plan has been submitted with Petitioner's application and petition. However, Petitioner may elect to construct fewer buildings and dwelling units than depicted on the concept plan. 5, Area lighting in the immediate vicinity of adjacent residential properties will be focused toward the interior of the project to avoid unnecessary glare and distraction to neighboring residents. Freestanding light poles will not exceed 20 feet in height, and the intensity of the lighting will not exceed 2-foot candles on the ground beneath the lamp. 6. No building will be constructed closer than 100 feet to the Georgetown Park subdivision. e C_O tion 2" 7, Buffering of the type described as "Typ P in Section 21-92(G) of the Roanoke County Zoning OandnGreenwood be provided along the boundary of Georgetown Park Forest where existing natural growth does not provide reasonably similar buffering. "Type C-Option 2" buffering specifies a 25-foot buffer yard with small evergreen trees (chvl5glineartl- mate height of 15 feet or greater and planted ea feet) and evergreen shrubs (having an ultimate height of 6 feet or greater, at least 18 inches at time of planting and planted each five feet). Planting will occur as soon as feasible in the course of construction. $. All dumpsters will be screened by solid wooden fencing and landscaping. No dumpster will be closer than 75 feet to Georgetown Park or Greenwood Forest. Respectfully submitted, M Occide tal Development,Ltd ,~,~~.~,.a.r _Y.,~~,-~, i ~ l By ` ~ e~ artn o a lams, 2 A'f'fACii`'IE'~T A v ~ , ~ o aC .a R 4 Z t R S ~ ~ • • ~ Z y• ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ ~, / ~~ , E " ~ g ~- 'l l , ~r I ~ ~' a ,t. ~~ONYpy ~1/.'. ~ . ""' f E ~9~ - S I~ ~y -~. f f } I Ii ~ ` '1 ~ ~ ..~ .:i;• ~. '• ~ ~ I . ~ '. .: •~i w: r ..f y, . ~ r• ~,. • .r • ~ ' ~ Yy - ~ t ~ r. .I W - •~ , I ~ v ~ ~ $ _ ~ ~i ~ _ ~ ti. ~l i. ~1 ~ ..~ ATTACHMENT ~ 1 , ,. 1 a \ ~\ -~. ; . ~ / / l l ~ 1~1j~1j1 \~ ~` / ~`~~ ~\~ X11 5 -1 , s I .~ • ~ 1111 _ ~1_ ~ 1 ~ :~ ,~ `~\ l 11.11111 , ~ .' \\ .~/ 1.1\1111 Illlllii l~'~i`,'l_I 1111 •C iIA ~~..~ ~^ ' B yD ~ A a ii z ~ ar 3 ~..~ S ~ i ~ Cl~~ o U ~~C°HY :~ ~~~ '~ ` a ~ o :~W ~~ w / ~ \~ra r a W 6 R O _ ...... is . ~ ` - ~ 1 / • I __ 1,, ,1 li ~ .I~. ~, ~. /- ~ ~ ' I •' }1 ` / ` .' 1 i ~ I ~ I 1 _~ -~ 4.. _s.r = 11_- i 5 ~ o I ; i I ~~ I 1-y -~ I = f- I W I ~ I i\\ 5 '' ~~ '" ~ I I W I ~I ~'_ _ ~ Q _ ~ _~ 1 ~~t O ~l' I~~ ~ ., ~ i ~~. / ~. ' } ! : ~ l . ;: 1 y ~?`' Lr /~~ i r I 1 I . I ~ I I ~ '. \ ~ '~ 1 ,'J.~ ' ~! a ;~ \ ' , .~ :~ • ~~ ~ ~ .; r• . ~ , ;. I l;l~ e I < nI pJ.~- ~~ ~ 1 ~ 1, I= ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~~ ~ 3a~ 7~~ / ,./ t ~gs ~ ~ ~~ I ~=/ 3~: i . • e .• :~~~ /; ~: i •'•1:;: `:~I~: I~:: :•I.~: :~I:: I ..: ~~ I ,: I.~ I: Il 1 ~ I ~. :1; t{ '~I! ,:1: , :' :% ,' ~~ .t ~ l ~ ~ 54cc,~ ,• ~ ` y .,- ~ ;'' ~ ~~ + ~' "^ ~~ ~q"' ~,N_~ '~ S~ ~ ~: ~' ~: .~ 8~f?~-S' NORTB ,i QCC IDENT~L ~EvELaPMENT, tTn COMMUNITY SERVICES ~3 ~ R'S w / MODIFY C/~TtON Of ~QNC AND DEVELOPMENT '7 '7.1 i - i - 5 5 8'9d -5 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF EHROANO DD COUNTYEADMINISTRATION CENTER~NTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT TH TUESDAY, AUGUST 28, 1990 ORDINANCE TO AMEND PROFFERED CONDITIONS ON THE REZONING OF A 24.94-ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF COLONIAL AVENUE OPPOSITE OGDEN ROAD INTERSECTION IN THE CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF R-3, CONDITIONAL, TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF R-3, CONDITIONAL (MODIFICATION OF PROFFERED CONDITIONS) UPON THE APPLICATION OF OCCIDENTAL DEVELOPMENT LTD. WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on August 14, 1990, and the second reading and public hearing was held August 28, 1990; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on August 7, 1990; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law; and WHEREAS, this property was rezoned from R-1, Single-Family Residential District, to R-3, Multi-Family Residential District with proffered conditions, in September of 1988. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing 24.94 acre, as described herein, and located on the west side of Colonial Avenue opposite Ogden Road intersection, in the Cave Spring Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of R-3, Conditional with proffered conditions, to the zoning classification of R-3, Conditional with amended proffered conditions. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of B9o -5 Occidental Development Ltd. That the applicant has voluntarily proffered in writing 3, the following amendments to the conditions approved by the Board of Supervisors in September of 1988, which the Board of Supervisors hereby accepts : 1) Old Towne Road, Ashmeade Drive, and Greencliff Road d their present terminuses will not be extended beyon a c r from the to or access at thisebusedafor vehicular otherw parcel. 2) No more than eleven dwelling units per acre will be than two hundred constructed on the land. No more dwelling units will be constructed in the sixty-four entire development. No more than t as tthree dwelling units will contain as many hundred forty other bedrooms. No more than one dwel r w y 1 ts three than more contain un t w 11 Weilin No d g bedrooms. 3) Access to Petitioner's intended development within ial o the parcel S~W tersection gw th Ogden Roadc i n is Avenue at 4) Development of the land in this prcel wlan dated the concept p substantial conformity to by Buford T. Lumsden & Assoc., a 1990 3 , , August of which plan has been submitted with copy petitioner's application. However, Petitioner may d dwelling elect to construct fewer buildings an units than depicted on the concept plan. 5) Area lighting in the immediate vicinity of adjacent ill be focused toward i es w residential propert lare terior of the project to avoid unnecessary g i n and distraction to neighboring residents. ill not exceed 20 feet in Freestanding light poles w t h l e beneath the height, 2 f of ground on the candles exceed lamp. 6) No building will be constructed closer than 100 feet to the Georgetown Park Subdivision. ~) Buffering of the type described as Type C-Option 2 rovided along the boundary ill be p in the ordinance w Park and Greenwood Forest where of Georgetown existing natural growth specifies a 25-foot buffer 89a- ~ yard with small evergreen trees (having an ultimate height of 15 feet or greater and planted each an linear feet) and evergreen shrubs (having ultimate height of 6 feet or greater, at least 18 inches at time of planting and planted each five feet). Planting will occur as soon as feasible in the course of construction. solid wooden 8) All dumpsters will be screened by fencing and landscapping. No dumpster will be closer than 75 feet to Georgetown Park or Greenwood Forest. 4. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: BEGINNING at Corner 1, an iron pin set on the western line of Colonial Avenue (having a right-of-way of varying width) at the northeast corner of property now or formerly belonging to Charles A. Bushnell and Nellie E. Bushnell; thence N. 44 deg. 58' 00" W. 519.26 feet to a marked 12" hickory; thence N. 31 deg. 33' 00" E. 352.10 feet to a set iron pin; thence N. 53 deg. 34' 00" w. 652.50 feet to a set iron pin designated Corner 4 ; thence N. 23 deg. 13' 07" E. 446.16 feet to a set iron pin; thence N. 23 deg. 45' 07" E. 370.00 feet to an existing iron pipe; thence S. 50 deg. 43' 51" E. 1,237.80 feet along the line of property now or formerly owned by the City of Roanoke to a set iron pin designated Corner 7 on the western side of Colonial Avenue; thence (and with all remaining courses along the western side of Colointt Avenue) S. 31 deg. 30' 35" W. 205.68 feet to a p thence N. 58 deg. 29' 25" W. 9.00 feet to ointp t encenSe S. 31 deg. 30' 35" W. 10.00 feet to oint; thence S. 31 58 deg. 29' 25" E. 9.00 feet to a p thence N. 58 deg. deg. 30' 35" W. 81.00 feet to a point; 29' 25" W. 9.00 feet to a point; thence S. 31 deg. 30' 35" W. 10.00 feet to a point; thence S. 58 deg. 29' E. 9.00 feet to a point; thence S. 31 deg. 30' 35" W. 370.32 feet to a point; thence with a curve to the left, whose radius is 2,316.83 feet and whose chord bearing and distance are S. 27 deg. 35' 35" W. 316.50 feet, the arc distance of 316.75 feet to a point; thence S. 23 deg. 40' 35" W. 37.69 feet to a point designated Corner 18; thence with a curve to the left whose radius is 2,839.79 feet and whose chord bearing and distance are S. 25 deg. 06' 08" W. 141.30 feet, the arc distance of 141.32 feet to Corner 1 and the point of beginning, containing in the aggregate 24.94 acres and being designated as Tract #1, all according to that certain plat of survey entitled "Plat Showing Property of Catherine Aicagurre Ronk" dated April 25, 1988, by Buford T. Lumsden & Associates, P.C., the details of which plat are incorporated herein by this reference. x'90- ~ 5, That the effective date of this ordinance shall be IIIIIIIIIIIIIIilllllllllllllllillilrlllllllilillllllllllllllillllilllillillllllililllllllllllllllllllllllllllllJ j~Jllllllllllllillllll _ /N _ ~ _ ~ PE ARAN CE REQUEST _ AP _ _ _ _ - AGENDA ITEM NO. ~ ` ~ - _ ~_ ~ _. - _ ~ _ -_ SUBJECT ~ ~ ~~ .~ ~~ O I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to __ - reco nize me during the public hearing on the above matter _ WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, c so that I may comment. _ - _ - I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR TH - - _ RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINE - _ _ _ __ LISTED BELOW. _ c • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment _ '- whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority-of the-Board- to - - do otherwise. _ • S Bakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Ques- __ -_ lions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. • All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized __ "" speaker and audience members is not allowed. -_ _ =_ _ • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. _ • Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments _ -_ c with the clerk. -_ • INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION _ FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT _ -_ _ _ c THEM. _ PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO DEPUTY CLER - - - - - - - _ _ q - _ ~ ~.,~ ~ ter-- ~l r-- - NAME ~r ~J~/ - 1 ~ ~ 5 _ _ - _ ~ ~ - ._ - ADDRESS ~ = _ _ _ _ _ PHONE ~ '` _ Illillllllllllll llllllilllllllllllll 11 l I Iilillllliillllililillliillll lillllllillllllillllllilillllllllillllllllllllllll mlilll IIIiIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIiIIIIIIIIiIiI~IIiIIIIIIIIIIIIIiIIIIIIIIIIiIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIItI~I,IJ,I ~Ililllllllllillllllllllll ~~ ,,~ P~ „ , ,4 _ _ _ ~. _ - ~. - _ _ _ _ E ARAN CE REQUEST _ APP _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ ~~ s ~. _ ~- _ '~~ ~ - ~ = AGENDA ITEM NO. _ _ SUBJECT ~ ~v = _ _ __ = I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to _ reco nize me during the public hearing on the above matter WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, _ so that I ma comment. _ _ _ _ _ I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR _ c _ RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINE _ _ _ _ LISTED BELOW. _ __ • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment = whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will =_ decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on oard toes c = and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the B _ do otherwise. _ • S eakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Ques- -_ lions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. _ • A11 comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized c speaker and audience members is not allowed. _ s eakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. __ • Both p • Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments __ with the clerk. __ • INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRI'TT'EN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. i PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO DEPUTY CLERK __ c NAME ~ _ - ADDRESS - PHONE ' c 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 mlllllllllll Illillllllllllllilllllllllllllli~11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111JJ ~jjlllllilllllllilllllllll ~, ,~. ,,~ . ,.,. _ _ - ~.. - - - _ - _ - PEARANCE REQUES _ AP _ _ _ _ _ - _ - _ _ _ ~ - _ ~ - _ - _ AGENDA ITEM NO. _ - ~~ - _ ~,~~ _ SUBJECT ~ 5 __ _ _ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to _ reco nize me during the public hearing on the above matter WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, _ so that I ma comment. _ _ _ I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FORT _ _ _ _ -' RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINE _ _ LISTED BELOW. _ __ • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment - whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an is {oue, = and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the maionty of the Board - = do otherwise. - _ • S eakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Ques- =_ -_ tipons of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. c _ -. _ _ • All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized _ c speaker and audience members is not allowed. _ _ • _ eakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. -_ Both sp - _ • re uested to leave any written statements and/or comments Speakers are q __ with the clerk. °_ • INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT _ = THEM. - - PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO DEPUTY CL _ __ -- NAME ~w } ~ . - ,- - ._ ,. ~ - ._ - f - _ ADDRESS ~" _ _ - _ ~-~ , . . PHONE ~ ~ ~ x~ ~ ~~ ~. .~..~: c IIIIIIIIIIillilllillllllllilllilllllllillillllllllllililllllllillllllllllllllllilllllllllllllllillllllllllllilll mlllilllllill IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII,111 ~; a~ .~,: ... WIIIIIIIIillllllilillllllllllll _ .. ~. ..~ _ - _ - ~:a _ _ ~~ - VEST APPEARANCE REQ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ - _ - _ - _ _ = AGENDA ITEM NO. ' .~, ~ ~ ~r _ - - ~ _ SUBJECT ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~;~ :-~ti~,~ - = I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to _ ' e me durin the public hearing on the above matter c reco niz _ g WHEN CALLED TO THE PODI = so that I may comment. _ I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FORT _ _ _ RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINE _ c LISTED BELOW. __ • aker will be iven between three to five minutes to comment _ Each spe g whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Beard to and will __ do otherwise. e akers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Ques- • Spe _ __ tions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. • All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized = speaker and audience members is not allowed. _ _ kers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. c • Both spec _ • S Bakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments =_ p c with the clerk. __ __ • INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. ~ i _. _ PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO DEPUTY CLE _ - -' NAME Ill ~~ ~ ~ ~' ~ ~ ~ ~ - ADDRESS `~`l 1 ~~c~ 1 ~,•.~~~-fz • • _. • _ PHONE ~ f QO ~ _ ; Ilillillllllllllilllllllil llliilllllillllllllllllllllllllillllllllllilllllllllilllllllllllllllllllllllilllll mllllllilllillllll ~~, ~ . °~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THER ANOKE OCOUNTYEADMINISTRATIONI,JCENTER~NTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE TUESDAY, AUGUST 28, 1990 ORDINANCE 8283 TO AMEND PROFFERED CONDITIONS ON THE REZONING OF AN APPROXIMATELY .25-ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED AT 5314 FALLOWATER LANE IN THE CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF B- 2, CONDITIONAL, TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF B ITIONS)D UPON ATHEMAPPLICATION OF JOHNELEE COND DAVENPORT. WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on August 14, 1990, and the second reading and public hearing was held August 28, 1990; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on August 7, 1990; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law; and WHEREAS, this property was rezoned from B-1, Office District, to B-2, General Commercial District with proffered conditions, on February 26, 1986. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing approximately .25 acre, as described herein, and located at 5314 Fallowater Lane, in the Cave Spring Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of B- 2, Conditional with proffered conditions, to the zoning classification of B-2, Conditional with amended proffered conditions. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of John Lee Davenport. 3. That the applicant has voluntarily proffered in writing the following amendments to the conditions approved by the Board of Supervisors on February 26, 1986, which the Board of Supervisors hereby accepts: 1) The property will be used for a take-out restaurant and food service, along with the existing office and video store. 2) An entrance and exit will be provided at all times from Fallowater Lane. 3) Petitioner will provide Type C screening and buffering where required by ordinance. 4. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: BEGINNING at a point on the easterly side of Bernard Drive, N. 25 deg. W. 200 feet northerly from the northeast corner of Bernard Drive and Fallowater Lane, both extended, said beginning point being also N. 25 deg. W. 179.59 feet from the beginning of the curve of the intersection of Bernard Drive and Fallowater Lane; thence N. 50 deg. 32' E. 50.95 oint on a point; thence S. 34 deg. 47' E. 188.47 feet to a p thence with Fallowater Lane, S. 47 deg. 38' Fallowater Lane; W. 64.67 feet to beginning of curve; thence following a curve to the right, whose radius is 15 feet, at a distance of 28.13 feet to a point 79 59e fee t to the Beginningt and beingDLote1 N. 25 deg. W. 1 1946 showing of Section 1 of T. P. Parker map dated June 12, ootion of a resubdivision of Lot 1 and being the southerly p Lot 3, Section 5, both of Beulah Heights. 5, That the effective date of this ordinance shall be August 28, 1990. On motion of Supervisor Robers to approve ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: Supervisor Eddy A COPY TESTE: Brenda J. Ho ton, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Development & Inspections Terry Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning John Willey, Director, Real Estate Assessment 8 9'D - ~ PETITIONER: JOHN LEE DAVENPORT CASE NUMBER: 23-8/90 Planning Commission Hearing Date: August 7, 1990 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: August 28, 1990 A. REQUEST Petition of John Lee Devtoporerate man akeeout restaurant andnfood approximately .25 acr P service with the existing office and video store, located at 5314 Fallowater Lane, Cave Spring Magisterial District. B. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION There was no opposition to the request. C. SIGNIFICANT IMPACT FACTORS laced Comprehensive Plan: 1985 Comprehensive DeveGeneral retailauses are this area within a Core land use Theeexpanded general retail use on encouraged within this category. this site would be consisteusewurbanodevelopmentninudesignatedeCore opment of intensive, mixed areas. This petition is not consistent with Policy C-2 because it is not served by an arteristent hwith Policy C 4e because thelstructure this site is not cons does not complement ~ dJdevelopm nt on thine si to wouldl ben consistent ordinance enforcemen , with the screening and buffering requirements of Policy C 5. Architecture: The single-family residence is not consistent wlis not Core land use categorY'newere ffice Band rretail developments in the compatible with othe , immediate area. Street Capacities: The rteen accidentsaoccurr d at thelintersection in 1986 was 2,500. Th of Bernard Drive and Routeurrentl 1 heavily etraveled and congesteda Drive and Route 419 is c y the food sales and service. Additional traffic will be generated by Without information on the t ion not possible t o determoneeadaitio as to food sales and service traffic generated by th ure com licence nw th Countylrequirementsed a site plan review to ens P D. PROFFERED CONDITIONS _ 1) The property will be used for off ice and v deo store nd2)foAn service, along with the existing entrance and exit will be provided at all times and buffering where 3) Petitioner will provide Type C screening required by ordinance. E. COMMISSIONER'S MOTION, VOTE AND REASON Mr. Witt said that the props d concernawith traffic onto Route 419S an encouraged us rove they request with proffered conditions. The He moved to app motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Winstead, Witt, Robinson, Gordon NAYS: None ABSENT: Massey 89a- ~ F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE None. V Concept Plan ~ Vicinity Map G. ATTACHMENTS: ~ Staff Report , Other ~~._ ~'' / ~-~ ~~ ~--<-' Terrance Harington, Se~L` etary Roanoke County Planning Commission ~~~-7 1 STAFF REPORT CASE NUMBER•23-8/90 PETITIONER: John L. Davenport REVIEWED BY: Janet Scheid DATE: August 7, 1990 1. NATURE OF REQUEST a. This is a conditional request. The property (approximately .266 acre) is currently zoned B-2 with conditions limiting use to office and video store. Petitioner requests a change to this proffer to allow take-out restaurant and food service. b. This site is located at the corner of Fallowater Lane and Bernard Drive. The portion of Bernard that this site fronts on, from the intersection with Fallowater Lane up the hill to the apartment complex, is a private road. c. Attached concept plan and vicinity map describe the project in more detail. 2. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS a. The B-2 zoning district permits a wide variety of uses. Petitioner has proffered to limit use on this site to office, video store, and take-out restaurant and food sales. b. VDOT commercial entrance permit will be required for Fallowater Lane site entrance. c. Site plan review will be required to ensure compliance with all County regulations. A perpetual easement will be required by the Zoning Administrator, to be filed with the deed on this site, permitting the parking and access road located on the adjacent site, as shown on the concept plan. 3. SITE CHARACTERISTICS a. Topography: Level. b. Ground Cover: Cleared with the exception of the existing structure. 4. AREA CHARACTERISTICS a. Future Growth Priority: Situated within the Cave Spring Community Planning Area. This area is designated for stable growth. Commercial infill development is encouraged. b. General area: Developed with high density commercial, institutional, office, and residential uses. This site is situated approximately 200 feet from VA Route 419. ~%®-~ z 5. LAND USE IMPACT ASSESSMENT Rating: Rate each factor according to the impact of the proposed action. Use a scale of 1 through 5. 1 = positive impact, 2 = negligible impact, 3 = manageable impact, 4 = disruptive impact, 5 = severe impact, N/A = not applicable. RATING FACTOR COMMENTS LAND USE COMPATIBILITY 3/4 a. Comprehensive Plan: 1985 Comprehensive Development Plan has placed this area within a Core land use category. General retail uses are encouraged within this category. The expanded general retail use on this site would be consistent with Policy C-1 - encourage the development of intensive, mixed-use urban development in designated Core areas. This petition is not consistent with Policy C-2 because it is not served by an arterial or higher grade street. The development on this site is not consistent with Policy C-4 because the structure does not complement adjacent office and retail buildings. Through ordinance enforcement, development on this site would be consistent with the screening and buffering requirements of Policy C-5. 3 b. Surrounding Land: The site is in close proximity to Route 419 and is surrounded by densely developed residential, commercial, institutional and office uses. 3 c. Neighboring Area: Dense suburban/urban development. 3 d. Site Layout: The total number of parking spaces must meet the requirements of all three uses (office, general retail, and restaurant). The existing parking lot will need to be expanded. As required by Roanoke County Parking Design Standards and the Zoning Administrator, a perpetual easement will be required on this property, to accommodate the access road and parking on the adjacent site, owned by Mr. Davenport and shown on the concept plan. 4 e. Architecture: The single-family residence is not consistent with the Core land use category. The architecture of this building is not compatible with other, newer office and retail developments in the immediate area. 3 f. Screening and Landscape: Has not been proffered. Must comply with Type C screening and buffering, per ordinance, along northwest boundary with R-3 apartment complex. 3 g. Amenities: Parking will have to be expanded to meet requirements for additional use - food service and sales. Site plan review will be required. See comments under "d" above. 2 h. Natural Features: None. 8qo-~' 3 TRAFFIC 4 i. Street Capacities: The average daily traffic count on Fallowater Lane in 1986 was 2,500. Thirteen accidents occurred at the intersection of Bernard Drive and Route 419 in 1987. The intersection of Bernard Drive and Route 419 is currently heavily traveled and congested. Additional traffic will be generated by the food sales and service. Without information on the amount of building space to be allocated to food sales and service it is not possible to determine additional traffic generated by this use. This information will be required at site plan review to ensure compliance with County requirements. 3 j. Circulation: Appears adequate as shown on the concept plan. UTILITIES 2 k. Water: Adequate source and distribution. 2 1. Sewer: Adequate treatment and transmission. DRAINAGE 3 m. Basin: Located within the Ore Branch drainage basin. 2 n. Floodplain: Not located in the floodplain. PUBLIC SERVICES 2 0. Fire Protection: Within established service area. 2 p. Rescue: Within established service area. N/A q. Parks and Recreation: N/A r. School: TAX BASE 2 s. -Land and Improvement Value: -Taxable Gross Sales/Year: -Total Employees: -Total revenue to the County/Year: ENVIRONMENT 2 t. Air: 2 u. Water: 2 v. Soils: 2 w. Noise: 3 x. Signage: Must comply with Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance. ~3go - ~' 6. PLAN CONSISTENCY This area is designated as Core. General retail uses, including food sales and service are encouraged within this land.use category. This petition complies with Policy C-1, but is not consistent with Policies C-2 and C-4. 7. STAFF EVALUATION a. Strengths: (1) Petitioner has proffered to limit the uses to office, video store, take-out restaurant and food service. (2) Petition is compatible with the Core land use. category. b. Weaknesses: (1) Petitioner has not made provisions to ensure adequate parking and access to this site. (2) Bernard Drive is a private road and, according to VDOT, due to grade and service, will remain a private road. (3) The intersection of Bernard Drive and Route 419 is currently congested. The proposed use will increase the potential hazard at this location. (4) Petition does not comply with Policies C-2 and C-4 of the Core land use category due to its service from private and secondary roads and the building design. c. Proffers Suggested: (1) Petitioner should proffer Type C screening and buffering. ~`~~ - 7 VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY A xssx$xparcel of land, ) P;NIE`--~ FEA x~~~~ located at intersection ) of Bernard Drive & Fallowater ) PROFFER Lane, ) OF within the Cave Spring ) CONDITIONS . Magisterial District, and ) recorded as parcel # 77.19--124 ) in the Roanoke County Tax Records. ) TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY: Being in accord with Sec. 15.1-491.1 et seq. of the Code of Virginia and Sec. 21-105E. of the Roanoke County Zoning John Lee Davenport Ordinance, the Petitioner hereby voluntarily proffers to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia the following conditions to the rezoning of the above-referenced parcel of land: 1. The property will be used fox a take-out restaurant and food service, along with the existing Office and Video Store; 2. An entrance and exit will be provided at all times from Fallowater Lane; 3. Petitioner will provide Type C screening and buffering where required by Roanoke County Zonin~'Ordinance. ~~ ~ I ;' ,: Respectfull~r Su M ~tted, ~,~~ ; Petitioner ~+ John Lee Davenport ~) ~3 90 - ~' • •, ~ ~ r •~ ` ~..a. ~.. ,~ ~' ~'' -:-«4.-- ,;.-~' "' J~ ~. .~~ ~~ d ~' L; n d ~~ 1~1_ ~r ='~~ 9 ~~ I ~ ~ ~ ) - .~ /~ - ~~-~ - _ _ ~, _ i ~ . , II ~- hk ~ i .~ 9~f~ ~ ~ _ __t_______ __ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~~~~. i ~ ~ ~ I' ' ' ~' '. ~ ~ ~ ~ / ~E i ~- - - ~~ L L 0 L~/,47~/~ LJ4~1/E ~ ~.,e~~e.e,~ s1~~~•bs ~ ~ ~ ~ c,d u,o ~11t ~Qe.s r~, p1c+~c ~ab1e s 1 1' I l 1 1 r i .. S ' CT04 ~~ll ~~~ *~~ • b~~ i~ • o 'b i J,J t ..ti, ~ r,,, ,~ ~ d / ,~ fi X r o l 11'~~ _`1!-...PPP K! A d ~~ ~~ !~ ~~ w «~ E. 'i.rrw,t~. ~ ~A ~ ~ }d~ r~r: ~~~ a w.l, .' , ' ~ ~ ~ ~r b~^1 Y"7a _~ 890 - 7 NORTB 8~Q - ~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT TUESDAY~OAUGUST N28, AD9 IO ISTRATION CENTER, ORDINANCE TO AMEND PROFFERED CONDITIONS ON THE REZONING OF AN APPROXIMATELY .25-ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED AT 5314 FALLOWATER LANE IN THE CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF B-2, CONDITIONAL, TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF B-2, CONDITIUPON (MODIFICATION OF PROFFERED CONDITIONS) THE APPLICATION OF JOHN LEE DAVENPORT. WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on August 14, 1990, and the second reading and public hearing was held August 28, 1990; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on August 7, 1990; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law; and WHEREAS, this property was rezoned from B-l, Office District, to B-2, General Commercial District with proffered conditions, on February 26, 1986. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing approximately .25 acre, as described herein, and located at 5314 Fallowater Lane, in the Cave Spring Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of B- 2, Conditional with proffered conditions, to the zoning classification of B-2, Conditional with amended proffered conditions. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of John Lee Davenport. 8~'~ _ 7 3. That the applicant has voluntarily proffered in writing the following amendments to the conditions approved by the Board of Supervisors on February 26, 1986, which the Board of Supervisors hereby accepts: 1) The property will be used for a take-out restaurant and food service, along with the existing office and video store. 2) An entrance and exit will be provided at all times from Fallowater Lane. 3) Petitioner will provide Type C screening and buffering where required by ordinance. 4. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: BEGINNING at a point on the easterly side of Bernard Drive, N. 25 deg. W. 200 feet northerly from the northeast corner of Bernard Drive and Fallowater Lane, both extended, said beginning point being also N. 25 deg. W. 179.59 feet from the beginning of the curve of the intersection of Bernard Drive and Fallowater Lane; thence N. 50 deg. 32' E. 50.95 oint on a point; thence S. 34 deg. 47' E. 188.47 feet to a p Fallowater Lane; thence with Fallowater Lane, S. 47 deg. 38' W. 64.67 feet to beginning of curve; thence following a curve to the right, whose radius is 15 feet, at a distance of 28.13 feet to a point on Bernard Drive; thence wit and beingDLotel N. 25 deg. W. 179.59 feet to the Beginning, 1946 showing of Section 1 of T. P. Parker map dated June 12, , a resubdivision of Lot 1 and being the southerly portion of Lot 3, Section 5, both of Beulah Heights. 5. That the effective date of this ordinance shall be AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, AUGUST 28, 1990 ORDINANCE 82890-14 TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A 0.28 ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED NEAR THE SOUTHERN INTERSECTION OF SR 904 (STARREY ROAD) AND SR 632 (CRESCENT BLVD.) (TAX MAP NO. 87.18-1-45) IN THE CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF B-2 TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF M-1 WITH CONDITIONS UPON THE APPLICATION OF NORMAN T. WRIGHT WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on August 14, 1990, and the second reading and public hearing was held August 28, 1990; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on August 7, 1990; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing 0.28 acre, as described herein, and located near the southern intersection of SR 904 (Starkey Road) and SR 632 (Crescent Blvd.), (Tax Map Number 87.18-1-45) in the Cave Spring Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of B-2, General Commercial District, to the zoning classification of M-1, Light Industrial District. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of Norman T. Wright. 3. That the owner has voluntarily proffered in writing the following conditions which the Board of Supervisors hereby accepts: 1) Facility will be used for sale and installation of tires and related services. 2) Facility will not be used for vehiclrebuilding, upholstering, major repairing, reconditioning, body and fender work. 3) There will be no overnight parking of inoperative or junk vehicles. 4. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: Beginning at an iron pin on the northerly side of Virginia Secondary Route 904, said pin being situated N. 75 deg. 58' E. 102.16 feet from the easterly side of Crescent Heights Boulevard with the northerly side of Virginia Secondary Route 904; thence with the northerly side of Virginia Secondary Route 904, N. 76 deg. 58' E. 81.66 feet to an old iron; thence N. 30 Weg•81080Wfeetlto feet to a point; thence S. 73 deg. ' an iron pin; thence with the line of the .033 acre tract previously conveyed to the Grantee and others, S. 11 deg. 30' E. 146.91 feet to the place of beginning. 5. That the effective date of this ordinance shall be August 28, 1990. On motion of Supervisor Robers to approve ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES• Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Brenda J. H ton, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Development & Inspections Terry Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning John Willey, Director, Real Estate Assessment 89©- 8 PETITIONER: NORMAN T. WRIGHT CASE NUMBER: 21-8/90 Planning Commission Hearing Date: August 7, 1990 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: August 28, 1990 A. REQUEST Petition of Norman T. Wright to rezone 0.28 acre from B-2 to M-1 to expand an existing grocery to include the sale of tires and related service, located near the southern intersection of SR 904 (Starkey Rd.) and 632 (Crescent Blvd.), Cave Spring Magisterial District. B. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION There was no opposition to the request. C. SIGNIFICANT IMPACT FACTORS SITE LAYOUT: Constrained by existing conditions. Concept plan indicates inadequate access to rear parking area and insufficient yard along north boundary. Minimum access width and landscaping requirements (see screening and landscaping) will necessitate reducing the proposed expansion by part or all of one bay. D. PROFFERED CONDITIONS 1) Facility will be used for sale and installation of tires and related services. 2) Facility will not be used for vehicle painting, upholstering, major repairing, rebuilding, reconditioning, body and fender work. 3) There will be no overnight parking of inoperative or junk vehicles. E. COMMISSIONERS MOTION, VOTE AND REASON Mr. Witt moved to approve the request with proffered conditions. The motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Winstead, Witt, Robinson, Gordon NAYS: None ABSENT: Massey F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE None. G. ATTACHMENTS: Concept Plan Vicinity Map _ / Staff Report Other d' ~i ,~ ..~C.~~s ~-~-- ~ _ t.~.w~~.-t.. i•~- Terrance Harington, Se "etary Roanoke County Planni~ Commission Sqo - 8 STAFF REPORT CASE NUMBERS Z1-S/90 PETITIONER! NORMAN T. WRIGHT REVIEWED BY: TIM BEARD DATE: AUGUST 7, 1990 Petition of Norman T. Wright to rezone 0.28 acre from B-2 to M-1 to expand an existing grocery to include the sale of tires and related service, located near the southern intersection of State Routes 904 (Starkey Road) and 632 (Crescent Blvd.), Cave Spring Magisterial District. NATORE OF REQIIEST a. Conditional request to expand an existing tire sales and installation facility. Petitioner intends to continue grocery sales without expansion in the same structure. b. Attached concept plan and vicinity map describe project more fully. APPLICABLE REGIILATIONS a. M-1 zoning permits a variety of light industrial uses including general automobile maintenance and repair (such as tire installation). The petitioner has proffered to sell and install tires and perform related services. Petitioner has also proffered not to use the facility for vehicle painting, upholstering, major repairing, rebuilding, reconditioning, body and fender work, and overnight parking of inoperative or junk vehicles. b. VDOT commercial entrance permit required. c. Site plan review required to ensure compliance with County regulations. SITE CHARACTERISTICS TOPOGRAPHY: Flat; site dips very gently to a well-defined swale along its north border. GROUND COVER: Cleared, graveled at entrance; to be paved adjoining existing grocery store parking area. AREA CHARACTERISTICS FOTURE GROWTH PRIORITY: Situated within the Cave Spring Community Planning Area. Designated as a stable growth area; currently receiving urban services. GENERAL AREA is developed with single family and multifamily residential, office and limited general retail uses. Undeveloped woodland lies south of petitioner's property. LAND QSE IMPACT ASSESSMENT Rating: Rate each factor according to the impact of the proposed action. Use a scale of 1 through 5. 1 = positive impact, 2 = negligible impact, 3 = manageable impact, 4 = disruptive impact, 5 = severe impact, and N/A = not applicable. 8~~ z RATING FACTOR COMMENTS LAND US_E COMPATIBILITY ~ COMPREHENBIV$ PLAN: 1985 Comprehensive Development Plan has placed this area within a Core land use category. Warehouse uses are discouraged with low compatibility while general retail uses are encouraged with high compatibility in Core areas. The proposal conforms with policy C-1 (encourage intensive, mixed use development in Core areas); policy C-4 (coordinate commercial site design with regard to minimum number of vehicular access points to public streets and building size and design should complement adjacent buildings). Site includes sufficient area to partially conform to policy C-5 (provide separation, screening and buffering to reduce nuisances with less intensive single family residential development). Proposal does not conform to policy C-2 (service each Core area by an arterial or higher grade street). 3 SIIRROIINDING LAND: Single family residential, general retail, secondary highways. ~ NEIGHBORING AREA: Single family residential, general retail, office, agriculture, woodland, secondary highways. 4 BITE LAYOIIT: Constrained by existing conditions. Concept plan indicates inadequate access to rear parking area and insufficient yard along north boundary. Minimum access width and landscaping requirements (see screening and landscaping) will necessitate reducing the proposed expansion by part or all of one bay. ~ ARCHITECTIIRE: One story, three-bay block expansion proposed (2,160 sq.ft.) to adjoin existing block garage and grocery. 3 SCREENING AND LANDSCAPING: Per ordinance. Not more than 10 percent of total building site area will consist of required buffer yard ~ (along east border) with increased plantings. This application is due to the very limited area involved relative to the wide buffer yard normally required by "type E" provisions. 3 AMENITIES: Concept plan indicates adequate parking for proposed expansion, although realignment is likely. Access lane must be widened to 24 feet. 3 NATIIRAL FEATIIREB: General area west of site has experienced drainage problems previously. TRAFFIC 3 STREET CAPACITIES: 1986 ADT on this segment of Crescent Blvd. was 180 vehicles. 1986 ADT on this segment of Starkey Road was 3,804 vehicles. Four accidents occurred on the 0.12 mile portion of Starkey Road from Buck Mountain Road (VA 679) to Crescent Blvd. (VA 632). Institute of Transportation Engineers reports that no data is currently available regarding traffic generation for tire sales/ installation facilities. 8~'~ - 3 ~ CIRCULATION: One entrance/exit proposed. Traffic will enter directly from Starkey Road or indirectly from Crescent Blvd. via existing paved area in front of grocery. Although existing circulation pattern is poor, proposed additional pavement will accommodate interior traffic to and from service bays. UTILITIES ~ l1ATER: 12 inch line located approximately 400 feet east of site; petitioner currently utilizes private well. ~ SEWER: 12 inch line located approximately 300 feet north of site; petitioner currently utilizes septic system. DRAINAGE 3 BASIN: Back Creek Subbasin. 3 FLOODPLAIN: Proposed site is not located within a flood hazard area so designated by FEMA. Should the site be determined to lie in the floodplain of a drainage area exceeding 100 acres, the County floodplain ordinance will be applied. Engineering Department will determine whether or not stormwater control measures will be required during formal plan review. PIIBLIC SERVICES ~ FIRE PROTECTION: Within established service standard. ~ RESCtTB: Within established service standard. NLA PARRS AND RECREATION: N A SCHOOLS: TAB RASE 2 LAND AND IMPROVEMENT VALUE: Estimated $58,500 TAXABLE GRO88 SALES/YEAR: No estimate available TOTAL EMPLOYEES: 10 currently; one additional anticipated to service proposed use. TOTAL REVENUE TO THE COUNTY/YEAR: Approximately $675 ENVIRONMENT 2 AIR: 3 WATER: Used tires to be removed at regular intervals. 3 SOILS: Used tires to be removed at regular intervals. 3 NOISE: M-1 district uses are required to be conducted within a completely enclosed building or within an area enclosed on all sides by walls, fences, or evergreen hedges at least six feet in height. 8 ~'~ - ~ SIGNAGE: New industrial district regulations permit a maximum 1.5 sq.ft. of signage per linear foot of property frontage (122 sq.ft. in this case) and no freestanding sign would be permitted since the property is less than 100 feet wide. CONB B This area is designated as Core. Although not a fully encouraged use (warehousing/general retail), petitioner's proposal is consistent with the land use plan map and with policies C-1, C-4, and C-5. The proposal does not conform to policy C-2 due to the absence of an arterial or higher grade street serving the site. STAFF EVALOATION BTRENGTHB: (1) Proposal is consistent with policies C-1, C-4, and C-5. (2) Petitioner has proffered that the facility will be used for tire sales and installation and related services. (3) Petitioner has proffered that the facility will not be used for vehicle painting, upholstering, major repairing, rebuilding, reconditioning or body and fender work. (4) Petitioner has proffered that there will be no overnight parking of inoperative or junk vehicles. 1rSARNE88E8: (1) Inconsistent with policy C-2. (2) Concept plan provides no information regarding signage or landscaping and depicts inadequate access to rear parking lot. PROFF$R8 SIIGGESTBD: None. 8'- ~''~° /s~1 .~ c~c~o Ff D ~' , -r'f'f' ~5._ G'T v ~l /~ " ~Oc• •~ T~'soH,'L1G oJyCi,G1~G~G ~ ~-p~~/~ ~~=T-,'-t-c~~t~1e yvR/~1f~~'l QoARo aF ~SvPc/~Y~.So~S ~F~~/~s~o~~fj-/f~G.l1~i~ ~~r Fo!-~occ1•'t~• CGO~o,'Taws ~ >d~ lI~/ioti.'~,jGoFTX /- FiIQ.',~ ,r/' Gu.`,c~ ~ vS~= o Fa rq S ~D~rS rt ; ors T,~~-,IT; a H o f T, y~ :s ~ No R<<A T~ o ,sue ~r,'c ~ S . Z FAc,~, Tt ccJ~`~~ h~ T ~6~ ~ s~ o foR r~ ~/i%cC= Pry-~~ r NG~ 1)OiYa~.,3T.= R,'IfG /l~,NolPR.:rAR, ~~, rf~,8v,'~o.'NG~ R,c° a~.n,~r-aN,~~~,~o~~-~r~~~~ ~ ~.+or~~s~ .~'Tjy/fR~- W,~~,r3~ /1n ovLl~rl.~T~ ~,¢~p~,~tiG of ~ i sP~c ~ f~~~r s~8~, TT a G~ 89t~-8 GD - I ~0 ` ~'p o; ~ Ih '~ ~ ~ a. ~%% ~ ~ ~ ~ , . Acne ~~r STA~~t'EY QQ40 QGaoGV~'~.eiy LACA7/ON MaG SG~LR': 1's iLL^' Propret of + ~ ~od QTf~G',~IP.SON i ~ ~ ~ S7GL ~~I nt f/eigVN~ E/vd /r r'cr~-..~rv-: ~,•~crnfrd ,~ ,his ,~o~.v. - ir..~ r~JS ,'e~r`~:r ~ ~r,~+ re~a6 L~,~ YvyW~ ~favaki a~!y 4dnini,•,tit-!icn;'tctsr, 3.~ o: urr~y ly ~«rl~.- l SOr; . ~~q~ae+tr ESw~syw .iale~, Yi/~i:aia i y.; ~ . ~`" j= -- ----- ---~-y~ tO74G LOT 45 . .i. / '~' 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ EX/ST/NG a -- - ~ ~ - - G/ove/te n ?` ~ ~ ~.z . ~ (CQESCENT 1~6T.5~~~----- ~s~„~~a~ i 42 ~ ~ 4~ • ~ ~ ~ GQOCEQY -~ W ' ~ i ~~~~. ~~x ~1 -~ ~ I r .b ~;:.~ #. ~ 1 Ate' ~~-~ 1 ~ ~ ~ Or-,wry J1 6. ~ x~co :Ong .M: 1 GIGS !Q~/.~ay /bv~rs{LY Srcl ~~ ~~a ~~ - f~ df.GG ` .. 1 N ~ i2 ~ ~ ~4yJi~.. ~ - ~ ~S/ E ;A''~r• fitronte -~ ~NTf~QSEGT~0~!!Q'1'• ~ ~~A/ 7X'X.rG. X.AO 1 ~..~ - ••• _ :..! =_-_ _ - - _ -- - -B(!~t' ,NP(JXT/AV ~C, '1 ----=--------------=--=- STATFROUTE 904 STAQxEr~':~dC----------------------- ca~~ y~A"N'C°~ ' ti-~.ty o~ NI~Kr.Jf~ LANL' NL'~ISCL :S!4 Slkvmgr, k'd SW. Que. ssas _°X/5T/NG r----• CONG~~T PL4N sc~: r-.SO' T-" NCw' ACG/71CM - - - ~•+ --------------------------~.._=~T--t C--------------------------~-_~-.--.`~-~_.~_ ~~~- -- ..S ELEr'AT'd.+V r,L^~u~.%UT~ 9;.: ~,~~/~'a Pf r~TI~,S~ PQCpEk?Y ~F tiGQ.yAN :' ~J~/ANT LOT N'O 4~ P~'FE,ET Y L~ENTIF/CAT10~t1 M4F B7. !8 lZOA~OA'£ CGUIiITY Proor~t~ of ,~t~fQrl~l JE~VX/~,S' G7T s9 •Q! P~gortty Of NAQY ,~CBECtA JfUNlM+'S! ~TF~ et Sf?~Stortsykd ~ ?so ~~ Y/~2G/N/A Pl?tr/~,a,Q£D l3Y ~~'J~w ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~' gip. •7 (/'~~~,~~~ ~ hid A ,/ ~ -~_ Kw ~ ~ ~- - ~~ ~ ~ ,' •~ • pygypp~ ~M RbGE VIANTA7~ON VtOE LINE ~~ ~~~I~ 1 _R'~' Z1 17 i 00 ~ a~ \~ a~ 1 NORTB ?' .., ~ v t4 ' v I ~.~ Ac 2, O / j~l 3~ / p 2 7 Ac e !~ • I ~ b ` / tw . 19 ~ ~ ~ ~y 3 = ~ ~~ ~ ~ao•~ • - i ~ , ~~ - .o ` ~ 2~ Aa / B~C ~ ~ 0 1 ~ . • ., / ~~ ` .~ / 21 X004 ~ • 2Z ~ . ` 40 42 / ''~ ~ `"~ ~~ • 9 i .,~ ~ / c } / - B Mo~ro~~ IIo00 ~ 8 uc 11~ 619 _ 44 - -- - ~~ ` BZ ~j s ~ ~ ~' '' - ---- --• --• ~ ~~ ~ ' ALL ARCE lS E ,,~Y y r Ao~~ S~o~rsy ,~ COMINUNI7'Y SBRVICBS AND DBVBLOPMBNT ARE ZC;NED___ OTHERWISE Ir NORMSN T. wQ ~ GH? 3 2 To M 1 8 ~©- AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THEROANO D COUNTYEADMINISTRATION CENTER,NTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE AUGUST 28, 1990 TUESDAY, ORDINANCE TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A 0.28 ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED NEAR THE SOUTHERN INTERSECTION OF SR 904 (STARKEY ROAD) AND SR 632 (CRESCENT BLVD.) (TAX MAP NO. 87.18-1-45) IN THE CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING C~SSIFICATION OF M 1 WITH CONDITIONS UPON THE CLA APPLICATION OF NORMAN T• WRIGHT WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on August 14, 1990, and the second reading and public hearing was held August 28, 1990; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on August 7, 1990; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing 0.28 acre, as described herein, and located near the southern intersection of SR 904 (Starkey Road) and SR 632 (Crescent Blvd.), (Tax Map Number 87.18-1-45) in the Cave Spring Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of B-2, General Commercial District, to the zoning classification of M-1, Light Industrial District. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of Norman T. Wright. 3. That the owner has voluntarily proffered in writing the following conditions which the Board of Supervisors hereby accepts: 8~~~ 1) Facility will be used for sale and installation of tires and related services. 2) Facility will not be used for vehicle painting, upholstering, major repairing, rebuilding, reconditioning, body and fender work. 3) There will be no overnight parking of inoperative or junk vehicles. 4. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: Beginning at an iron pin on the northerly side of Virginia Secondary Route 904, said pin being situated N. 75 deg. 58' E. 102.16 feet from the easterly side of Crescent Heights Boulevard with the northerly side of Virginia Secondary Route 904; thence with the northerly side of Virginia Secondary Route 904, N. 76 deg. 58' E. 81.66 feet to an old iron; thence N. 11 deg. 30' W. 151.9 feet to a point; thence S. 73 deg. 30' W. 81.80 feet to an iron pin; thence with the line of the .033 acre tract previously conveyed to the Grantee and others, S. 11 deg. 30' E. 146.91 feet to the place of beginning. 5. That the effective date of this ordinance shall be Wlililllllllllllllllllllllilllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllilllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll~1111111111111111111111111111111lJ _ ~~ _ • a n#_ _ _ - ARANCE RE UEST ~.~~~_.. _ APPS Q ~ ,. _ _ - ,t _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ~. _ AGENDA ITEM NO. ~ __ - _ - _ - _ SUBJECT ~..~~ ~r¢=~~ ~ ~ v ~~ ~ w ~- _ _ - I would like the Chairman of the Board of Su ervisors to reco nize me durin the ublic hearin on the above matter so that I ma comment.WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES =_ LISTED BELOW. __ • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, c and will enforce the rule unless Instructed by the majority of -the- Board to do otherwise. c • Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Ques- tions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. _ • All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized c speaker and audience members is not allowed. __ • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. __ c • Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments c -_ with the clerk. __ • INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION c FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT __ THEM. -_ D IVE T DEP TY LERK _ PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AN G O U C _ _ mlllllllilllllllllllllilllillllillllllllllllllllllillllllllllllllllillllllllllliilllillllllllllllllllllllllllilllllllilllllitlillm .*. b - ~ p P-0 ~ ~ ~ ~1~1. yy~ ,tea = - 1r A - - APPEARANCE REQUEST - _ - - _ __ - - AGENDA ITEM NO. = SUBJECT ~'~ P ~ ~ f ~ c ~ ~~ ~-~--, ~~~ ~.~_s - - - - - _ ~ _ = I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to =_ recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so that I may comment.WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, - I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE - = RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES __ _ - LISTED BELOW. _ _ _ • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment -_ whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will = decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to " do otherwise. - __ • Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Ques- bons of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. - • All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. __ • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. - • Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments __ with the clerk. c =_ • INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED = GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT - _ = THEM. -_ - - - PT .F. A SE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO DEPUTY CLERK _ - m~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~Iliillllilllllllllllllllllllillllllllllllllillllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Ilillllllllllllllillllllllilllllil II IIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIII,IIJ ~ "~ ~~' .~,~s, ~~ ~~~, , _ ~ . y 1. "'.p, PEARANCE REQUEST _ AP _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ AGENDA ITEM NO. ~ -' _ _ ~ ~ _ - suBJ l ~F~~ ~,~ h~~.~ , - ~ .~ - _ = I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to = recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter = _ so that I may comment.WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, - - - I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FORT c - RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES - - _ _ LISTED BELOW. =_ _ • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment __ whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, = and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. _ • S Bakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Ques- P tions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. Debate between a recognized • All comments must be directed to the Board. _ __ speaker and audience members is not allowed. __ • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. • Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments - with the clerk. _ -_ • INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED = '- GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION = FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT __ THEM. _ -_ PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO DEPUTY CLERK c __ NAME h,~' ~-'- i - 5 / _.--~-~r '~ -~" ~ _ - _ _ ADDRESS ~ ~ ~' ~ ~ ~ ~f ~' ~ `-~ ~ `- _ __ c PHONE j ? ~ ~ ~= ~ `~ ~i c _ mliiillillllllllllllillllillllllllllllllllll I IIIIIIIIillllllllillllllllllllillllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllillllllllillllll ~ ``aNV* of ``~ '.P 9 = c~ ~ 2 a . - 18 ' S0 88 SFS~UICENTENN~P~ COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C HODGE Ms. Marjorie Anderson 5122 Craun Lane Roanoke, VA 24019 Dear Ms. Anderson: August 29, 1990 RICHARD W. ROBERS. CHAIR~+=V UVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL D15- _' STEVEN A. MCGRAW. VICE-CHAIR4IV UTAWBA MAGISTERIAL D15-~ LEE B. E=:~ NIN DSOR MILLS MAGISTERIAL OI~~ BOB L. JOHN~,v NOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DL~~ HARRY C. NICxEVS VINTON MAGISTERLLL O15' ~ t" At their regular meeting on Tuesday, August 28, 1990, the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors unanimously approved the request of the Northside Athletic Booster Club for a raffle permit. The raffle will be conducted on September 14 and 21, October 5 and 26, and November 9, 1990. The fee has been paid and your receipt is enclosed. You may consider this letter to be your permit, and I suggest it be displayed on the premises where the raffle is to be conducted. The State Code provides that raffle and bingo permits be issued on a calendar-year basis and such permits issued will expire on December 31, 1990. This permit, however, is only valid on the date specified in your application. PLEASE READ YOUR APPLICATION CAREFULLY. YOU HAVE AGREED TO COMPLY KITH STATE AND LOCAL REGULATIONS AND FAILURE TO COMPLY MAY RESULT IN CRIMINAL PENALTIES AND REVOKING OF YOUR PER'bflT. YOU MUST FILE A FINANCIAL REPORT BY NOVEMBER 1 OF EACH CALENDAR YEAR PLEASE SUBMIT A NEW APPLICATION AT LEAST 60 DAYS PRIOR TO DATE OR DATES YOUR ORGANIZATION PLANS TO HOLD BINGO OR RAFFLES. PERMITS EXPIRE ON DECEMBER 31 OF EACH CALENDAR YEAR. If I may be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me at 772-2003. Sincerely, ~-,~.~ ~ . Mary H. Allen, Roanoke County bjh Enclosures cc: Commissioner Commonwealth 11. ~M(~tirt .., (~ ~ ~ 'II'I '' ~ l~~ :1-~l~~i`1`~1~ 1979 (yt~lllt~ 1989 BOARD OF SUPERVISC~S of the Revenue Attorney Clerk Board of Supervisor County Treasurer O~ AOANp,YF ~ .A ~ 9 a 18 ~°s 88 S~SQVi'CENTENN~P~ a Baauti~ul8t~iwnin,~ COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE Mr. Fred Smith P. 0. Box 541 Daleville, VA 24083 Dear Mr. Smith: August 29, 1990 ALL AMERICA .'-~ 1 I I ~' 1979 1989 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS RICHARD W. ROBERS. CHAIRVAV CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DIS`R ~ STEVEN A. MCGRAW. VICE-CHAIRM.4V CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DIS ~ ~: LEE B. E~:~ WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DIS'G~,- BOB L. JOHN_C^ti HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DIS'R ~: HARRY C. NICKEtiS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DIS'. _. `. At their regular meeting on Tuesday, August 28, 1990, the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors unanimously approved the request of the Botetourt Jaycees for a raffle permit. The raffle will be conducted on October 6, 1990. The fee has been paid and your receipt is enclosed. You may consider this letter to be your permit, and I suggest it be displayed on the premises where the raffle is to be conducted. The State Code provides that raffle and bingo permits be issued on a calendar-year basis and such permits issued will expire on December 31, 1990. This permit, however, is only valid on the date specified in your application. PLEASE READ YOUR APPLICATION CAREFULLY. YOU HAVE AGREED TO COMPLY WITH STATE AND LOCAL REGULATIONS AND FAILURE TO COMPLY MAY RESULT IN CRIMINAL PENALTIES AND REVOKING OF YOUR PERMIT. YOU MUST FILE A FINANCIAL REPORT BY NOVEMBER 1 OF EACH CALENDAR YEAR. PLEASE SUBMIT A NEW APPLICATION AT LEAST 60 DAYS PRIOR TO DATE OR DATES YOUR ORGANIZATION PLANS TO HOLD BINGO OR RAFFLES. PERMITS EXPIRE ON DECEMBER 31 OF EACH CALENDAR YEAR. If I may be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me at 772-2003. Sincerely, Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisor bjh Enclosures cc: Commissioner of the Revenue Commonwealth Attorney County Treasurer C~L11tri~1~ i1~ ~DMn11~2F P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24018-0798 (703) 772-2004 O~ AOANp~~ ti i A ~ °~ 2 a ~ 8 E50\ 88 SFSQUICEN7ENN~P~ ,d Beauii~u/Bckinninl; COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE ~Q1t1Tf1~ its ~11~tITt1~P Mr. J. Carson Quarles 7323 LaMarre Circle Roanoke, VA 24019 Dear Mr. Quarles: August 30, 1990 Alt AMERICA CITY ' I I I' 1 1979 1989 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS RICHARD W. ROBERS. CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT STEVEN A. MCGRAW, VICE•CHAIRMAN CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT LEE B. EDDY WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT The Board of Supervisors have asked me to express on their behalf their sincere appreciation for your previous service to the Industrial Development Authority. Citizens so responsive to the needs of their community and willing to give of themselves and their time are indeed all too scarce. This is to advise that at their meeting held on Tuesday, August 28, 1990, the Board of Supervisors voted unanimously to reappoint you as a member of the Industrial Development Authority for another four-year term. Your term will expire on September 26, 1994. State law provides that any person elected, re-elected, appointed to any body be furnished a copy of the Freedom of Information Act; your copy is enclosed. We are also sending you a copy of the Conflict of Interest Act. Both of these acts were amended by the Virginia General Assembly in July, 1989. It is necessary that you take an oath of office before the Clerk of the Roanoke County Circuit Court. This oath must be administered rp for to your participation on this Committee. Please phone Mrs. Elizabeth W. Stokes, Clerk, at 389-6208, as soon as possible and arrange to have this oath administered. On behalf of the Supervisors and the citizens of Roanoke County, please accept our sincere thanks and appreciation for your willingness to accept this appointment. Sincerely, MHA/bjh Enclosures Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors pc: Mrs. Elizabeth Stokes, Clerk of Circuit Court Timothy Gubala, Secretary, IDA P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24018-0798 <703) 772-2004 o~ aoANO,~~ ti 'A A Z ,_ °a a 1 a CESU> $$ S~SQUICENTENN~P~ d Btauti~ul8ckinninR COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE Mr. Edmund J. Kielty 6158 Burnham Road Roanoke, VA 24018 Dear Mr. Kielty: C~nitn~~ of ~nttnvkr August 30, 1990 All -AMERICA CITY '' I I ~' 1979 1989 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS RICHARD W. ROBERS. CHAIRMAN GAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT STEVEN A. MCGRAW. VICE-CHAIRMAN CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT LEE B. EDDY WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT The Board of Supervisors have asked me to express on their behalf their sincere appreciation for your previous service to the Community Corrections Resources Board. Citizens so responsive to the needs of their community and willing to give of themselves and their time are indeed all too scarce. This is to advise that at their meeting held on Tuesday, August 28, 1990, the Board of Supervisors voted unanimously to reappoint you as a member of the Community Corrections Resources Board for a one- year term from August 13, 1989 to August 13, 1990, and another one- year term beginning August 13, 1990, and expiring August 13, 1991. State law provides that any person elected, re-elected, appointed to any body be furnished a copy of the Freedom of Information Act; your copy is enclosed. We are also sending you a copy of the Conflict of Interest Act. Both of these acts were amended by the Virginia General Assembly in July, 1989. On behalf of the Supervisors and the citizens of Roanoke County, please accept our sincere thanks and appreciation for your willingness to accept this appointment. Sincerely, MHA/bjh Enclosures pc: Mr. Jim Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Phipps, VASAP P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24018-0798 (703) 772-2004 aF POAN ~.~ i A L ti 2 ~ ,2 v a 18 E50 88 SFSQUICENTENN~P~ -1 Bcauri~ulBeKinnink COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE C~uixn~,~ of ~ottnviir August 30, 1990 Mr. W. Robert Herbert, Chairman Roanoke Regional Airport Commission 215 Church Avenue, S.W. Roanoke, VA 24011 Dear Mr. Herbert: ALL-AMERICA CITY ('I I') 1979 1989 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS RICHARD W. ROBERS, CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT STEVEN A. MCGRAW, VICE-CHAIRMAN CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT LEE B. EDDY WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT Attached is a copy of Resolution No. 82890-5 approving a specific capital expenditure for the acquisition by the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission of 8.125 acres of land for airport expansion and development. This resolution was adopted by the Board of Supervisors at their meeting on Tuesday, August 28, 1990. If you need further information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, y-~.-~ ~ ~ Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors bjh Attachment pc: Ms. Jacqueline L. Shuck, Executive Director, Roanoke Regional Airport P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 2 4018-07 9 8 (703> 772-2004 of PCAND~F ~ .A ~ 2 Lp'~ ~ 2 v a 18 ~Eso~ 88 S~SQV~CENTENN~P~ 1 Bcauri~d BcKinnin~ COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE (~niYnf~ of ~uttnnkP August 30, 1990 Air Force Reserve Army Reserve Marine Corps Reserve National Guard Virginia Ladies and Gentlemen: ALL #MERICA LITY 'I I I') 1979 1989 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS RICHARD W. ROBERS, CHAIRMAN GAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT STEVEN A. MCGRAW. VICE-CHAIRMAN CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT LEE B. EDDY WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT Attached is a copy of Resolution No. 82890-1 expressing the Board's appreciation to local military personnel defending our country in the Middle East. This resolution was adopted by the Board of Supervisors at their meeting on Tuesday, August 28, 1990. The Board would like each member of the reserve units to know that their personal sacrifices are appreciated, and we hope that the situation will soon be resolved in a peaceable manner. Sincerely, Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors bjh Attachment P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24018-0798 (703) 772-2004 ~, O~ P~ANO~F !~ ' ^ G z A ~ ~ 2 v a 18 (ES_°~ 88 SFS~UICENTENN~P~' A BatutifulBcl;irntinr; COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE August 29, 1990 Rev. Alan Rowbothan Unity of Roanoke Valley Church 3300 Green Ridge Road, N.W. Roanoke, VA 24019 Dear Reverend Rowbothan: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS RICHARD W. ROBERS, CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT STEVEN A. MCGRAW, VICE-CHAIRMAN CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT LEE B. EDDY WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT On behalf of the Board of Supervisors, I would like to take this opportunity to let you know of our appreciation for your attending the meeting on August 28, 1990, to offer the invocation. We feel it is most important to ask God's blessing on these meetings so that all is done according to His will and for the good of all citizens. Thank you for sharing your time with us. RWR/bjh All AMf RICA CITY ~/ 1 ~ I ~'' C~~lz~t~ .ark ~~r~rt~r~ 1979 1989 Sincerely, R. W. obers, Chairman Roanoke County Board of Supervisors P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24018-0798 (703) 772-2004