The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About9/25/1990 - RegularSEPTEMBER 25, 190 County staff requests the Board to adopt a motion to enter into executive session within the provisions of the Virginia Freedom of Information Act as follows: (a) to discuss a specific legal matter requiring the provision of legal advice by the County Attorney and briefings by staff members concerning Dixie Caverns Landfill in accordance with Sec. 2.1-344 A 7 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended. (b) to discuss a prospective business or industry where no previous announcement has been made of the business' or industry's interest in locating in Roanoke County in accordance with Sec. 2.1-344 A 5 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended. AIIAMERICA CITY O~ POANp~~ ' ~ ~ I ~ ~ 'P ~ I I z ~' ~~ i-~l~ ~i `~~~ 1979 a ~~~x~~ 1989 ~a . ESOP as S(cSQUiCENTENN~P~' 1 Brnuti/ulBc~innin~; BOARD OF SUPERVISORS RICHARD W. ROBERS. CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT COUNTY ADMINISTRATOROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISO'RS'' A.~T WBA MAGISTER AL{DISTRICT ELMER C. HODGE LEE B. EDDY WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT ACTION AGENDA BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT SEPTEMBER 25, 1990 Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meeting. Regular meetings are held on the second Tuesday and the fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public hearings are held at 7:00 p.m on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.) 1. Roll Call. ALL PRESENT AT 3:05 P.M. 2. Invocation: The Reverend Steve Harris Baptist Children's Home 3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag. B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS ITEM D.5 - RWR ANNOUNCED POSTPONEMENT 990-1 - RWR ADVISED THAT SPRINGWOOD ASSOCIATES ATTORNEY HAD REQUESTED CONTINUANCE OF PUBLIC HEARING i P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24018-0798 (703) 772-2004 HCN MOTION TO GRANT CONTINUANCE AYES: SAM, HCN, RWR NAYS: LBE, BLJ STAFF TO BRING BACK TO NEXT BOARD MEETING POLICY FOR CONTINUANCES C. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS, AND AWARDS RWR RECOGNIZED SENATOR MACFA-RLANE IN ATTENDANCE D. NEW BUSINESS 1. Explore presentation and announcement of Plan Review Process Initiation. A-92590-1 HCN MOTION TO APPROVE STAFF RECOMMENDATION TO INITIATE PLAN REVIEW PROCESS BY 1/1/91 AND ESTABLISH EXPLORE ADVISORY CObIlVIITTEE - URC COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR REQUESTED WORK SESSION WITH PLANNING STAFF, PLANNIING COMII~IISSION AND EXPLORE STAFF 2. Approval of adjustments to 1990-91 Budget due to state funding changes. A-92590-2 BLJ MOTION TO APPROVE TRANSFERRING $103,593 TO GENERAL FUND BALANCE FOR OFFSET TO 1991-92 FISCAL IlVIPACT OF BUDGET CUTS - URC 3. Approval of Fire Mutual Aid Agreement between Botetourt County, Roanoke County and Blue Ridge Volunteer Fire Department. a A-92590-3 HCN MOTION TO APPROVE - URC BLJ RECOIVIlV~ENDED THAT STAFF ASK ROANOKE CITY TO RECONSIDER PARTICIPATING 4. Request for additional Police Department staffing. A-92590-4 HCN MOTION TO APPROVE STAFF RECOMII~NDATION OF $200,000 FOR FOUR POLICE OFFICERS, A RECORDS MANAGER, WITH ADDITION THAT ACCREDITATION SPECIALIST AND TELEPHONE RECEPTIONIST IF FULIrTII1~ BE EXTENDED FRINGE BENEFITS - URC 5. Acceptance of Adult Drug Rehabilitation Grant, and appropriation of matching funds. POSTPONED 6. Acceptance of Anti-Drug Abuse Grant for Neighborhood Watch Program. A-92590-5 HCN MOTION TO ACCEPT GRANT - URC 7. Request for funding from TAP for Transitional Living Center. A-92590-6 HCN AMENDED MOTION TO APPROVE FUNDING OF $15,000 WITH UNDERSTANDING THAT REQUESTS FOR FUNDS BE IlVITIATED FROM TAP AS TIDY FEEL APPROPRIATE DURING THE CURRENT FISCAL YEAR - URC 8. Authorization to create a Recycling Advisory Committee. 3 (CONTINUED FROM 9-12-90) A-92590-7 RWR MOTION TO APPROVE STAFF RECOMMENDATION AYES: LBE, SAM, RWR NAYS: BLJ, HCN E. REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS NONE F. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS NONE G. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING FOR REZONING ORDINANCE -CONSENT AGENDA BIiI TO APPROVE FIRST READING - URC PUBLIC HEARINGS - 10.23-90 1. An ordinance to rezone 1.301 acres from R-1 to R-3 to allow apartments, located on Feather Road at VA 24, Vinton Magisterial District, upon the petition of W. E. Cundiff. 2. An ordinance to rezone 7.8 acres from R-1 to R-3 to allow townhouses, located on Hardy Road near Wolf Creek, Vinton Magisterial District, upon the petition of Steve Brown. 3. An ordinance to rezone 12.3 acres from R-1 to R-E to allow a golf course, located along Wolf Creek between Hardy Road and VA 24, Vinton Magisterial District, upon the petition of Steve Brown. 4 4. An ordinance to rezone approximately 125 acres from M- 1 to M-2 and amend the Future Land Use Plan map designation of approximately 175 acres from Development to Principal Industrial to allow industrial development, located south of the intersection of US 11/460 (West Main Street) and Route 612 (Barley Drive) and adjacent to and west of the N&W Railway, Catawba Magisterial District, upon the petition of the Industrial Development Authority. H. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS SUPERVISOR EDDY: (1) ASKED FOR UPDATE ON STATUS OF CABLE TV FRANCHISE. SAM REPORTED NEXT MEETING ON 9/28 AND SHOULD HAVE AGREEMENT BY END OF YEAR. (2) UPDATED BOARD ON RECENT MEETINGS REGARDING SEABOARD FARMS COMPLAIlVTS. (3) QUESTIONED WHETHER JUSTICE DEPARTMENT HAS RULED ON FINAL PLAN FOR CONSOLIDATION VOTE. PMM ADVISED THEY HAVE NOT. (4) 1'HANI~D FELLOW BOARD MEMBERS FOR ADDING HIM TO DEMOCRATIC PARTY MAILING LIST BUT DECLINED. SUPERVISOR ROBERS: (1) SMART HIGHWAY UPDATE. NEXT MEETING IN FEBRUARY, 1991. (2) REPORTED ON AIRPORT COMII~IISSION RETREAT. (3) WII.L BE MEETING WITH GOVERNOR WILDER AND SEVEN OTHER GOVERNORS IN ATLANTA OCT 9 TO DISCUSS BUSINESS RELATIONS WITH JAPAN. I. APPOINTMENTS NONE 1. Board of Zoning Appeals 2. Building Code Board of Adjustments and Appeals 3. Grievance Panel 5 J. CONSENT AGENDA ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WII.L BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WII.L BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY. R-92590-8 HCN TO APPROVE WITH ADDITION OF ITEM J.5 -APPROVAL OF RAFFLE PERNIIT FOR MASON'S COVE ELEMENTARY PTA URC 1. Approval of Minutes -August 28, 1990 2. Confirmation of appointments to the Industrial Development Authority and League of Older Americans. A-92590-8.a 3. Approval of Resolution of Appreciation to George Nester for service to Roanoke County as Vinton Town Manager. A-92590-8.b 4. Approval of 50/50 Raffle Permit -Loyal Order of Moose Lodge No. 284. A-92590-8.c 5. Approval of Raffle Permit -Mason's Cove Elementary School PTA. A-92590-8.d K. CITIZENS' CONIlViENTS AND CO1~~IlVIUNICATIONS NONE 6 L. REPORTS BLJ TO RECEIVE AND FILE - i1W 1. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance 2. General Fund Unappropriated Balance 3. Board Contingency Fund 4. Accounts Paid -August, 1990. M. EXECUTIVE SESSION pursuant to the Code of Virginia Section 2.1-344 (A) AT 5:15 P.M., RWR MOTION PURSUANT TO CODE OF VIRGINIA 2.1- 344 (a) TO DISCUSS A SPECIFIC LEGAL MATTER AND BRIEFINGS CONCERNING DIXIE CAVERNS LANDFILL (b) TO DISCUSS A PROSPECTIVE BUSINESS OR INDUSTRY WHERE NO PREVIOUS ANNOUNCEMENT HAS BEEN MADE URC RETURN TO OPEN SESSION AT 7:00 P.M. EVENING SESSION (7:00 P.M.) N. CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE SESSION R-92590-9 SAM MOTION TO APPROVE AT 7:05 P.M.- URC O. PUBLIC HEARINGS 990-1 Public Hearing for citizen comments on county participation in the Hotel Roanoke/Conference Center Project with Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. A-92590-10 RWR MOTION TO APPROVE STAFF RECObIlViENDATION TO BRING BACK REPORT AT OCTOBER 23, 1990 MEETING - URC 11 CITIZENS SPOKE FIVE-NIINUTE RECESS DECLARED AT 8:15 P. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 990-2 An ordinance modifying an existing Planned Unit Development plan on a 2 acre tract generally located within the Stonehenge PUD, south of Kelly Lane in the Cave Spring Magisterial District. This request is to permit the construction of a 16 unit, single building condominium, upon the request of J. Allison Associates. (CONTINUED FROM 8-28-90) 0-92590-11 RWR TO DENY ORDINANCE - URC 990-3 An ordinance rezoning 7.35 acres from RE Residential to M-2 Manufacturing to construct a contractor office and equipment storage located on Catawba Valley Drive in the Catawba Magisterial District upon the request of Lacy G. Alexander. SAM MOTION TO CONTINUE UNTIL OCTOBER 23, 1990 MEETING - URC 990-4 An ordinance approving a Use Not Provided For permit for construction of a 50 to 60 foot microwave tower to be located at the back entrance of Dominion Bankshares Bankcard Operations Center at 5673 Airport Road s located in the Hollins Magisterial District upon the request of Dominion Bankshares Corporation. 0-92590-12 BLJ MOTION TO GRANT USE NOT PROVIDED FOR PERNIIT HCN AMENDED MOTION TO RESTRICT HEIGHT OF TOWER TO 50 FEET HCN SUBSTITUTE MOTION TO APPROVE USE AS REQUESTED WITH THE UNDERSTANDING THAT DOCUMENTS FROM FAA BE A PART OF THE PERNIIT AND ATTEST TO NO PROBLEMS WITH HEIGHT OF TOWER URC 990-5 An ordinance to amend the proffered conditions on 2.25 acres, to construct a retail drive-thru window, located at 4515 Brambleton Avenue, Windsor Hills Magisterial District, upon the request of Springwood Associates. CONTINUED UNTIL OCTOBER 23, 190 (SEE MOTION UNDER B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE) Q. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES NONE R SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance rescinding Ordinance 81490-6, imposing or increasing user fees for the Parks and Recreation Department and appropriation of funds. 0-92590-13 BLJ TO APPROVE ORDINANCE AYES: SAM, BLJ, HCN, RWR 9 NAYS: LBE 2. Ordinance amending and reenacting Section 21-153, Section 21-157, Section 21-159, Section 21-160, Section 21-162, and Section 21-163, of Article VIII, Tax on Prepared Food and Beverages of Chapter 21 of the Roanoke County Code, Taxation, to increase the criminal penalties for failure to file the required returns or to collect or pay the tax imposed by this article. 0-92590-14 HCN TO APPROVE ORDINANCE - URC S. CITIZENS' COMII~NTS AND CO1~~IlVIUNICATIONS NONE OTHER BUSINESS LBE MOTION TO AUTHORIZE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR TO DONATE $1,000 TO DARRELL SHELL SCHOLARSHIP FUND AT RADFORD UNIVERSITY FROM BOARD CONTINGENCY FUND URC BLJ MOTION TO AUTHORIZE COUNTY ATTORNEY TO GO FORWARD WITH COLLECTION EFFORTS REGARDING DIXIE CAVERNS LANDFILL CLEANUP URC T. ADJOURNMENT BLJ MOTION AT 9:45 P.M. io ~ a A" ~F ALL-AM~ICA Cf11f -~ 9 1 , ' ~ ~~Yt~~~ ~~ ~ , 18 ~ 88 ~~g~8~g rESQU1CENTEN~~' A Bt~rti~ulBtRinning ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA SEPTEMBER 25, 1990 Re lar Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meeting. gu meetings are held on the second Tuesday and the fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public hearings are held at 7:00 p.m on the fountTuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announce A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.) 1. Roll Call. 2. Invocation: The Reverend Steve Harris Baptist Children's Home 3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag. B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS C. PROCLAMAI'IONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS, AND AWARDS D. NEW BUSINESS 1. Explore presentation and announcement of Plan Review Process Initiation. 2. Approval of adjustments to 1990-91 Budget due to state funding changes. 3, Approval of Fire Mutual Aid Agreement between Botetourt County, Roanoke County and Blue Ridge Volunteer Fire Department. 4. Request for additional Police Department staffing. 5. Acceptance of Adult Drug Rehabilitation Grant, and appropriation of matching funds. 6. Acceptance of Anti-Drug Abuse Grant for Neighborhood Watch Program. 7. Request for funding from TAP for Transitional Living Center. 8. Authorization to create a Recycling Advisory Committee. (CONTINUED FROM 9-12-90) E. REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS a F. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS G. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING FOR REZONING ORDINANCE -CONSENT AGENDA 1. An ordinance to rezone 1.301 acres from R-1 to R-3 to allow apartments, located on Feather Road at VA 24, Vinton Magisterial District, upon the petition of W. E. Cundiff. 2. An ordinance to rezone 7.8 acres from R-1 to R-3 to allow townhouses, located on Hardy Road near Wolf Creek, Vinton Magisterial District, upon the petition of Steve Brown. 3. An ordinance to rezone 12.3 acres from R-1 to R-E to allow a golf course, located along Wolf Creek between Hardy Road and VA 24, Vinton Magisterial District, upon the petition of Steve Brown. 4. An ordinance to rezone approximately 125 acres from M- 1 to M-2 and amend the Future Land Use Plan map designation of approximately 175 acres from Development to Principal Industrial to allow industrial development, located south of the intersection of US 11/460 (West Main Street) and Route 612 (Barley Drive) and adjacent to and west of the N&W Railway, Catawba Magisterial District, upon the petition of the Industrial Development Authority. 3 H. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS I. APPOINTMENTS 1. Board of Zoning .Appeals 2. Building Code Board of Adjustments and Appeals 3. Grievance Panel J. CONSENT AGENDA ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WII.L BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WII.L BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WII.L BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY. 1. Approval of Minutes -August 28, 1990 2. Confirmation of appointments to the Industrial Development Authority and League of Older Americans. 3. Approval of Resolution of Appreciation to George Nester for service to Roanoke County as Vinton Town Manager. 4. Approval of 50/50 Raffle Permit -Loyal Order of Moose Lodge No. 284. 4 K, CITIZENS' CO11~IlV1ENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS I,,. REPORTS 1. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance 2. General Fund Unappropriated Balance 3. Board Contingency Fund 4. Accounts Paid -August, 1990. M, EXECUTIVE SESSION pursuant to the Code of Virginia Section 2.1-344 A N. CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE SESSION EVENING SESSION (7:00 P.M.) O. PUBLIC HEARINGS 990-1 Public Hearing for citizen comments on county 5 participation in the Hotel Roanoke/Conference Center Project with Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. P. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 990-2 An ordinance modifying an existing Planned Unit Development plan on a 2 acre tract generally located within the Stonehenge PUD, south of Kelly Lane in the Cave Spring Magisterial District. This request is to permit the construction of a 16 unit, single building condominium, upon the request of J. Allison Associates. (CONTINUED FROM 8-28-90) 990-3 An ordinance rezoning 7.35 acres from RE Residential to M-2 Manufacturing to construct a contractor office and equipment storage located on Catawba Valley Drive in the Catawba Magisterial District upon the request of Lacy G. Alexander. 990-4 An ordinance approving a Use Not Provided For permit for construction of a 50 to 60 foot microwave tower to be located at the back entrance of Dominion Bankshares Bankcard Operations Center at 5673 Airport Road located in the Hollins Magisterial District upon the request of Dominion Bankshares Corporation. 990-5 An ordinance to amend the proffered conditions on 2.25 acres, to construct a retail drive-thru window, located at 4515 Brambleton Avenue, Windsor Hills Magisterial District, upon the request of Springwood Associates. 6 Q, FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES R. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance rescinding Ordinance 81490-6, imposing or increasing user fees for the Parks and Recreation Department and appropriation of funds. 2. Ordinance amending and reenactingo e21 1601Section Section 21-157, Section 21 159, Secti ~ 21-162, and Section 21-163, of o rCha ~rI21 of the Prepared Food and Beverages P Roanoke County Code, Taxation, to increase nse or to final penalties for failure to file the required ret collect or pay the tax imposed by this article. S. CITIZENS' COMII~NTS AND COINIlVIUNICATIONS T. ~JOURNMENT ROANOKE COUN'T'Y RESOURCE AUTHORITY ROANOKE COUNTY RESOURCE AUTHORITY SEPTEMBER 25, 1990 TO BE HELD AT THE CONCLUSION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS 7:00 P.M. SESSION OR AT 9.00 P.M. AGENDA A, OPENING CEREMON~S 1. Roll Call: B, OLD BUSINESS (CONTINUID FROM 9-12-90) 1. Continuation of discussion on use of Area A, Current Landfill. Roa~~ol~ courrTY RESOURCE AUTHORITY ROANOKE COUN'T'Y RESOURCE AUTHORITY SEPTEMBER 25, 1990 TO BE HELD AT THE CONCLUSION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS 7:00 P.M. SESSION OR AT 9:00 P.M. AGENDA A. OPENING CEREMONIES 1. Roll Call: B. OLD BUSINESS (CON1'INiTID FROM 9-12-90) 1. Continuation of discussion on use of Area A, Current Landfill. A-92590-1 Item No . ~ "'° ! AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, H IN ROANOKE,OVA ON TUESDAY DMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: September 25, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: Explore Presentation and Announcement of Plan Review Process Initiation COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~~ c EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Roanoke County has supported Explore through planning and endorse- ments in the past. River Foundation President Dr. Norman D. Fintel, will brief the Board of Supervisors on Explore's recent progress and announce next steps, including the initiation of the County's plan review process by January 1, 1991. Project Director Bern Ewert, and Engineer Richard Burrow, will be present. BACKGROUND: In 1985, the Board of Supervisors adopted the Explore concept. In 1986, County coordinated the community planning process in east and west Roanoke County for Explore Park and Roanoke River Greenway. In 1987, County assisted Explore in the negotiation and acquisition of Palmer Estate. In 1989, County received the All America City Award with assistance from Botetourt County and Explore. Earlier this year, County made Explore one of its top economic development priorities. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Explore's opening means jobs and tax revenue to Roanoke County and the region. Explore will provide educational opportunities for our children and preserve old buildings from Roanoke County and the .U- i region. Roanoke County would like to assist Explore to help it become a reality by 1994. Explore has acquired roughly 1,300 acres of state park land, which will be served by a national parkway, the Roanoke River Parkway, and has raised over $28 million toward its goal. FISCAL IMPACT: None STAFF RECOMMENDATION: 1. Administrator supports the initiation of the plan review process by January 1, 1991, and recommends that the County proceed with comprehensive plan review, revision and land use approval process for Explore. This would involve: (a) evaluating an amendment to the future land use plan, and (b) evaluating a request for a "Use Not Provided For" permit. 2. County Attorney Paul Mahoney has suggested that an Explore advisory committee, similar to that utilized in citing a new landfill, could be helpful. The County Administrator concurs and recommends that the County establish an Explore Citizens Advisory Committee to assist, as needed, in the plan review process. The committee would be composed of nine citizen representatives: one appointed by each Supervisor for each district, one member appointed by the Town of Vinton, one member appointed by Explore, plus two additional representa- tives from east Roanoke County (one from the north side of the river and one from the south side of the river). Staff support would be provided. The role of the Committee would be to review Explore plans during the plan review process and review and advise how the plan would be reviewed by the community. Respectfully submitted: Approved: ~ ~. Joy~ a Waugh Elmer C. Ho e Ecdno is Development Specialist County Administrator ---------------------------------- ---------------------- ACTION No Yes Abs Approved (~1 Motion by: Harry C. Nickens Eddy x Denied ( ) to approve staff recommenda- Johnson x Received ( ) tion McGraw x Referred Nickens x to Robers x cc: File Tim Gubala, Director, Economic Development Terry Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning A-92590-2 ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER ~- AT A REGULAR MEETING THE TROANOKERCOUNTY UADMINI5TRP,TOIONROENOER COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT MEETING DATE: September 25, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: Fiscal 1990091°andhFyG1991n92,s Budget Reductions for FY COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~//J~ _ .~, ,I -C 'l 1 ~ "F EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: On Thursday, September 13, 1990, the Governor's Plan for 199 - 92 Budget Reductions was released which outlinesoter~nentsy across adjustments as they pertain to the local g Virginia. VACO and VML have submitted copies of the report and comments which help to describe the State's actions. Staff has reviewed the impact for the 1990-91 fiscal year and also the 1991 92 fiscal year, to the deg to theofiscaln impact tat he Countyfof the following analysis as Roanoke including our school system. BACKGROUND• Attachment 1 outlines the budget adjustments by revenue source or agency as presented in the Governor's report. The accompanying notes describe the impact to Roanoke County for each item. Overall, the impact to the County for the current fiscal year appears to be a net gain of $59,329. The adju ear nhaveo n t cbeen the State agencies for the 1991-92 fiscal y completed to date, so the full impact is not truly determinable at this time. The main reason that we are able to overcome the cuts for the current year is the use of the savings from the employer contributions to the Virginia Retirement System based on the Legislature's decision not to fund future COLA adjustments until after July 1, 1992' Thhooldscstem andt$165a2561fordthenCountylon was $758,298 for the Sc y The Schools should realize a net loss of $31,775 based on the savings for V R S contributions and the cuts in the areas of Duty Free Lunch, Sales Tax, and Other Standards of Quality Funding Reductions. The $157,000 new revenue anticipated from the State sharing of the Recordation Tax will also not be realized. r:-a State supported agencies such as the Health and Social Service Departments have been notified to reduce their administrative costs and not to impact programs. The reduction amounts shown on Attachment 1 reflect the state share of the funding for these operations (55~ for Health and 80~ for Social Services). In the case of the Health Department, $4,961 will be unmatched oyriated dollars in the current year's budget and could be unapp P by the Board. In Social Services, the unmatched portion would be $7,474. In both cases, the state has advised that the redrotrams would be in administrative costs and not in the service p g to clients. The administrative costs could include such things as salaries, office operating costs, and facility costs (rent and utilities). Grants such as the block grant for Youth Haven II and the Victim Assistance Grant for the Commonwealth Attorney were individually reviewed by the state agencies and the impac rant shown. In the case of Youth Haven II, the loss of block g monies represents an increase in the local share of the Pevgous cost, howevsrandhin the becalculatbon tof perediem rates pfor the block grant future. House Bill 599 monies (Police) have been held harmless for Roanoke County in both years of the biennium since this money was included in a spec ial h aPP areal has n taken tsevereancuts o int other police department. T localities. Reimbursements from the Compensation Board w Vacanc prPolicyy offset by the imposition of a Required 30 Day Y whereby constitutional officers must hold vacancies open for 30 days before submitting them for inclusion on salary reimbursement forms. Other savings to the agency will be based on the state decision not to grant the suggested 2~ salary increase as of December 1 (which had never been funded by the state) and by revisions to the estimated cost of operations (reimbursementlaoe er diem estimates, g V R S contributions, jail p reimbursements, etc.). FISCAL IMPACT• The net impact for the 1990-91 fiscal year appears to be a net gain of $59,329, however adjustments among some of the agencies must be made to allow the programs not to suffer during this year. While the impact to the current fiscal year is favorable, and the perceived impact for the 1991-92 fiscal year seems manageable, the potential impact for 1992-93 and beyond could be disastrous, particularly if the savings from the employer sadrustments for contributions is not available or if the impending J 199.1-92 and beyond for olumnsofn Attachment nllshows thensuggested increased. The last c amendments to the current budget. ~' STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff suggests amending the budget as outlined in Attachment 1 which places any surplus in the Fund Balance of the General Fund to help offset the anticipated shortfall for the 1991-92 fiscal year. Respectfully submitted, Approved by, h7 ~~r~ -!~'~`. J Elmer C. Hodge / John M. Chambl•ss, Jr. County Administrator Assistant Administrator _____________ -------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved (X) Motion by: Bob L Johnson No Yes Abs to approve staff recommenda- Eddy x Denied ( ) Johnson x Received ( ) tion x Referred ( ) McGraw Nickens x To ( ) Robers x cc: File John Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator Reta Busher, Director, Management & Budget Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance ~~~ N U N ~ J 1'-1 O C.3 ~ O _ ~ U W m V1 U W O ¢ W O Z m d W Z m ~ J ~ W "" O J W W W = Vf O W rr ~'° 7 Q 4" N > > Z J W ~ Z W Z W Z . -i Z W W W W C.7 ¢ 7 7 Li W W W W ~ = W ~ ~ Q ~ W ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~' ~ 2 N J 1 W W W W W~ W r ~ (.3 ""I Q O~ J Q Q Q¢ C ~ 0 ¢ f- O Z W T . H I--- H Z F-- W O N N O ~ W ""1 V1 Vf In ? N W OO >- W W W ¢ W N Z J ~ O ~ N O O O O (/f O ~ ~ N K ~ O F- F-- Vf to N W N H U N N N W ~ W J N ~ ~~ i--1 W O O O O O J J J H J i W I Z O ~ F-- t+- Z N O f- H H O H O J W W ¢ 5 W W W Z W O 2 N ~- ~' O VI t/f Vf W V1 W H D ~ LWi ~ W F- W W W W a W ~ O O~ O O O O ¢ I 11 1 ^ ^ O ^ a' ~ O O I O ~ ^ ~ ~ I M II 1 T II ' O I tff O O ~ ~~ O 1 tD N f 11 I t1 1 II ~ I I O 00 OO O O 1 f\ t\ ~ O I tf) 1 M 11 I O O O~ N O I tp tp 1 O II Z .--1 1 O~ F- 1 ^ 1 Ct O~~ ~ Ot ~ ~ ; ~ ~ .--I 11 1 II W 1 W I N 1 1 ~ v I 1 II 1 ~ v v^ v 1 1 H fn O~ ~ 1 O> > 1 ~ 1 1 1 II 1 II ~ r-I CD 1 1 I 1 ii 7 1 1 ~ 1 II I 1 1 1 1 1 W 1 1 1 O ~' N O I N .-~I .--I N M I ~ 1 ^ II ~ I ~ I W 1 1 Z I 1 1 ^ 1 ^ M O ~„~ 1 O ~ ^ ~ N 1 r-1 11 1 ~ II 0 1 1 ^ ^ _ M OO N CO ~' 1 O ~ M ~ M O M 1 N N ~ m 1 1 O p O CP CD I M M M O O ~ tD .N.. ^ I ['f II I I N F- ' O O O~ N tff 1 Q r--1 ~ 1 O t tD I e--I II ~ j O; ¢ 1 ~ ~ O I p~ M O N ` N N ~ 1 I ~ ~ r-1 1 N II ~ / II N d 1 N tCf N !D 1 N I v ~ . ..i 1 . I I II ~ 1 ~~ 1 ~^ v I ~ Z 1 1 II j ~ ~ ...i 1 ~ 1 ~ 1 II I p 1 1 I _ ~..~ 1 1 ^ ^ O C O ^ ti O ~ N N 1 M 11 ~" 1 1 1 M O N O O ; ^ ~ ~ ~ t0 ~ ~ ~ 1 00 N j ~. 11 ~ 1 I O O p O~ O O O T N O 1 1~ p ~ O ~ ~ N 1 O II U I d ,~ r 1 OI t\ V O 1 1 r-1 n v N O v O v I 1 O ~ 1 t0 11 1 II 1 Q 1 ~~ Ir tD I ~ I 1 ~ 1 11 1 II ~ 1 ~ H 1 ~ ~ ~ ^ ,--1 1 1 II 1 Qf I ~ ~ 1 11 1 r-1 i I 1 1 1 1 ^ ^ ^ M O ^ O ~ ^ 1 01 10 fA 1 ^ II 1 .-~1 11 1 a' II 1 1 1 M O N 00 Ct ; M M M ~ M ~ ^ I N N 1 O II 11 I 1 O ~ ~ 1 1 1 ~ II In 1 N H 1 O O O N N i M ¢ I O In ~ j ~ Q 1 V O p o M N N ~ ~ u 1 M .-+ 1 N 11 / II 1 e-I d 1 t ff N LO 1 N . .i I . .i 1 ~. 1 11 I--' 1 01 ~ 1 v~^~ I ~ Z 1 1 II („) I 01 1 j 1 1 1 ii W 1 N 1 I ^ 1 II O 1 1 ^ 1 ^ 1 ^_ O j Q j lD 1 1~ 11 CC 1 1 ^ M O O O l0 n O N d' 1 N N 1 O I I II d I 1 1 O O O C7f O 1 N O N CO O 00 O v 1 ff 1 1 Qf II 'y H 1 O O Cn N N I 1 ~ L 1 C V Q j I Cn Q I O CO ^ ~ O O i ^ .O.i ~ ~ .N..i 1 ~ ~ 1 I 1 I--' 1 O Ll 1 N ~ ~ 1 . -I ~ I 1 (n 1 01 H 1 ~~^~ 1 1 I 1 ~ 1 ~ 1 1 1 I I N I 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 ; 1 I ~ 1 1 I ~ i W 1 I 1 I 1 ; 1 I 1 ~ 1 I 1 1 ~ 1 ~ a I ~ z w 1 1 1 I r I F- 1 W ~ £ _ 1 z 1 z I ~- z~ ¢ w W ' . . I~ I o Z 1 1 N ¢ ~~ F- iU. i H . 1 U r I O 1 O CL C.9 Q W ~ J 1 Z Z 1 1 W O 1 ~ X 1 S ¢ f- O W N Z ¢ d ~ ~ ~ 1 F-' W I U CO Q I U I Vf F- Z W Z _ O 11 O m I ~ m 1 I O ~ I Z F.- ~ 1 W ~ W Q 2 .~ VI N 1 W 1 F- U J f- Z 1 G' Z ~ .U--i N J ~ ~ 1Wr 1 F- ~ I I I-_ ~-+ 1 r-i W X O I W 3 ~ O I U ' U¢ 0 N Q Z Q N Z Ow ~ Z 1 a Z 1 OC 1-- W ~ ~ ¢ ` O = Z 1 1 1 ~ W 1 I • Vf t/f ~ Vf ~ i = J ~ ~ W Cn ¢ N ~ O ~ = ry 1 J A W W O ' O 1 F- U H S C.3 N ~ ~ U I 1 U O H J 2 G O O Q ~ W 1 1 J F- O U U ~ W ~ I ~' 1 W 1 2 D Vf O 7 1' ~ = m W O ~ W ~ S I ~ ~! 1 Z f- ¢ 1 U I fn Q S fn 7 d 1 N TO THE WORKSHEET ~~ NOTES STATE BUDGET REDUCTIONS IMPACT TO THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE BUDGET NOTE 1 School revenues for FY 1990-91 for Duty Free Lunch, Sales ax Projections, and the Other Category as they relate to the Standards 103. of Quality funding were reduced by a total of $633, Projections for FY 1991-92 are anticipated in November and the same level of reduct be otherb reductionsean the State'sa updatehis time. There may also NOTE 2 The Legislature decided not to fund future COLA adjustments for the V R S until after July 1, 1992, therefore the employer contribution rate has been revised downward. A similar reduction should be available for FY 1991-92, however the salary base will be different and the both theaSchoola and County budgetsa• This adjustment applies to NOTE 3 The Recordation Tax was scheduled to be shared with t e localities beginning October 1, 1990, and was to be used for Public Transportation or Public Education purposes. The ear g whi h twas estimate was $157,000 for the current fiscal y included in our budget for education purposes. The state revised it's estimates to $ this 8revenueFwi101 be realized by the Countyl 92, however none of NOTE 4 rofits The State revised it's revenue projections for ABC p and Wine Tax to produce an additional $17,854 for FY 90-91 and $3,034 for FY 91-92. The County has not totally relied on the State project~o854 in revenues for the cu rent fiscal year nts an increase of $ , NOTE 5 The expenditure reductions (reimbursements) for the Healt Department and Social Services Department are based on the State's share (55~ for Health and 80~ for Social Service of administrative advised that the cuts must be in the category costs and not reductions in programs to clients. Administrative costs could include salaries, office operating 961tforotheaHealth costs. The unmatched local share would be $4~ ests leaving Department and $7,474 for Social Services. Staff sugg the unmatched local share in the budget to minimize the impact for the transition. NOTE 6 The Victim Assistance Grant, like most other grants from t e state, was reviewed and the state share was reduced by $60 for the current fiscal year. The grant was originally for $5,675 and was used to fund this activity in the Commonwealth Attorney's office. NOTE 7 The block grantli° of htheo elig ble opera gng co ts. 2/3The the salaries and a reduction of $16,074 for FY 90-91 and $21,633 for FY 91-92 could be funded from previous Block Grant reserves for our program and would be calculated in future per diem rates charged to other localities or agencies utilizing the program. This would provide a -0- impact to the General Fund budget at this time. NOTE 8 The Regional Emergency Response Team is normally reimbursed for incurred expenses and monies were included in the State Budget to cover this item. The State allocation has been reduced by 10~. The County included $5,000 in the current fiscal year budget and the corresponding $500 reduction was included in our analysis. NOTE 9 Reductions in the State Compensation Board budget may have no direct impact to Roanoke County for the current fiscal year, even though the relative share was estimated by the State at $29,421. The following items were considered in the State calculations: JAIL PER DIEM PAYMENTS - The state estimate of actual prisoner days has been revised based on trends for the past two months. Actual payments to localities will continue to be based on actual prisoner population per day. STATE ems' locOal V shareONT TYBi TIOfactore also 2 reduced s the restate to th reimbursement requirement. MILAGE RATE REIMBURSEMENT FOR GOVERNMENT OWNED VEHICLES - The Compensation Board in the approved budget authorized a rate of $0.1636 instead of the normal $0.24 for reimbursed milage for government-owned vehicles. Milage for personal vehicles will continue to be at $0.24. 30 DAY VACANCY POLICY - Any vacant position within a Constitutional Officer's office must remain vacant a minimum of 30 days before being submitted on the State Reimbursement forms. Further comment will be received before a decision is made in this area for next year. 2~ SALARY INCREASE FOR CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES The 2~ salary adjustment discussed for December 1, 1990 for Constitutional Officers and their employees was not funded in the original budget allocation and will not be funded at this time . Since no monies had been included for this in the County budget, there is a -0- impact. Staff suggests that the County not provide this increase as a local expense at this time. NOTE 10 The HB 599 monies to fund the Police Department have been held harmless in this budget reduction and there is a -0- impact for both fiscal years. The Board may recall that this money was a special appropriation to help in the transition to a Police Department. ACTION # A-92590-3 ITEM NUMBER ~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING EOROANOKEBCO DTY ADMINISTRATION OCENTER OKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT TH ~r~FmTNr pAT September 25, 1990 SUBJECT• Fire Mutual Aid Agreement - gotetourt and Roanoke County ('OUNTY ADMINSTR.AmO~s CO B,ArKGROUND INFORM_ATTON Title 27 of the Code oetweeni politicade ~urisdict onsb for mthe of mutual aid agreements b purpose of providing fire and rescue services. ~~T1~"'ARY OF TNFOI~I~+~ATION: With the inception of tessar 1 to developaa mutual aid afire meat Roanoke Counties, it became nec y between the two counties aar to reementiine place twith the DTroutville There is already a simul g art of this operation also. Volunteer Fire Department wha will be a p The staffs have developed thi aagrov dnitanAtcoPYooftthe agrementais of Supervisors has recently pp attached for the Boards consideration. F_TRCAL IMPAGT: With the approval and implementation of this agreement there should be an operational cost savings in the future. SmA~ OMMEN~IATION: Staff recommends that the Board authorise the County Administrator to execute such ~ ocses of th s transact on t 11 uponaform necessary to accom the County Att rney. to be approved by Y ~ 3 Approved by, Respectfully submitted, ~ ,.d ~~~ ~~~ L} ~~ ua Elmer C. Hodge Thomas F q ~ County Administrator Chief of Fire & e cue Department - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ACTION - - - .. - - VOTE Motion by: Harr~~ C Nickens_to No Yes Abs Approved (x ) Eddy x Denied ( ) Johnson x Received ( ) McGraw x Referred Nickens x To Robers x - cc: File Thomas C. Fuqua, Chief, Fire & Rescue W. E. BOOZE, JR., Chairman WANDA C. WINGO, Vice-Chairman R. E. LAYMAN, JR. G. C. THOMPSON, JA. H. E. WILHELM Botetourt County Board of Su~iervisors August 28, 1990 ,, MEMO TO: ~. Tommy Fuqua Mr. Sam Smelser n )~ ` i FROM: Mr. John B. Williamson, III ~ ,/;~~' County Administrator ~~'~~ ~~ SUBJECT: Mutual Aid Agreement 11' ~-3 JOHN B. WILLIAMSON, III COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR PHONE (703) 473.8223 FAX (703) 992.8207 1 WEST MAIN STREET•BOX t FINCla'TIE, VIRGINIA 24090 Enclosed please find a copy of the mutual aid agree- ment between the Blue Ridge Volunteer Fire Department, Roanoke County, and Botetourt County as approved by the Botetourt County Board of Supervisors on August 24, 1990. Please have this agreement formally approved by your respective Boards. Once that approval has been formally made, please let me know, so that I may circulate copies for original signatures by the involved parties. Thank you for your consideration in this regard. Enclosure cc: Elmer Hodge, Roanoke County Administrator Mutual Aid Agreement file ' it ~ ~-3 HU1'UAL AID AGREEMENT PROPOSAL ~ This Agreement, made and entered into this day of ~I 1990, by and between the COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA, hereinafter referred to ii as Roanoke County, and the COUNTY OE' BOTE'1'OURT, VIRGINIA, hereinafter referred to as Botetourt County, and THE BLUE RIDGE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT' OE' BOTE-i 1'OURT COUNTY, VIRGINIA, INC., a Virginia Corporation, hereinafter referred toll as the Blue Ridge Volunteer Fice Department. l WITNESSETH WHEREAS, the Boards of Supervisors of Roanoke County and Botetourt County' desire to provide the best and most cost-effective fire protection for their citizens; and, WHEREAS, Botetourt County owns fire-fighting equipment used by the Blue Ridge Volunteer Fire Department; and, WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of both counties, and the Blue Ridge Volunteer Fire Department, have concurred in the effort to develop a mutual aid agreement for improved fire-fighting in Roanoke and Botetourt Counties, I as authorized by Section 21-3 of the Code of Virginia; an , WHEREAS, Section 27-3.1 of the Code of Virginia provides that cooperating counties may procure or extend the necessary public liability insurance to cover claims arising out of mutual aid agreements. NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the undertakings hereinafter set out, the parties covenant and agree as follows: iI 1. Mutual aid in fire-fighting. a. Roanoke County Fire Department Station 12 (Read Mountain Fire Sta- ll tion) will respond as a second due company to assist Blue Ridge to calls in the following areas: ~ 1. a perimeter consisting of a circle drawn from the boundaries of: North - Laymantown Road to Rainbow Forest Drive l i East - U. S. Route 460 to the Blue Ridge Parkway West - Webster Road to State Route 607 (Bore Auger Road) 2. including the subdivisions of Knollwood, partial Rainbow Forest, Peachtree Valley, Stepping Stone, Rainbow Estates and Clearview ~ Estates. ~, b. Blue Ridge Volunteer Fice Department will respond as a second due company to assist Station 12 to calls in the following areas: 1. U. S. Route 460 (Challenger Drive) to the City limits and all ~I State Roads intersecting with it including Bonsack Road, Carson Road, and State Route 604 to State Route 654. I l 2. including the subdivisions of Little Tree Nursery Estates, La- it Bellevue, Hunt Ridge, Meadows of Trent and The Orchards. l _.. ._ y l^_ I • I'~I, Page 2 ~ ~ 2. Assistance in nondesi Hated areas. Roanoke County and the Blue Ridge Volunteer Fire Department agree to re-' spored when called to assist in the other areas not described in this Agree- ment, when the personnel and equipment can be safely spared. 3. Desi nation of officials. Roanoke County and the Blue Ridge Volunteer Fire Department shall respond) to a call for service only upon request of the official designated for that) purpose. The parties shall notify one another of the identity of the official or officials designated to request such assistance. 4. Indemnification. a. Roanoke County agrees to indemnify and hold harmless Botetourt County and Blue Ridge Volunteer Fire Department, their officials, officers, agents, employees and volunteers, from any and all claims, Legal actions, and judg- ments arising out of, oc in the course of, the performance of this Agreement. b. Botetourt County agrees to indemnify and hold harmless Roanoke County and its officials, officers, agents, and employees, from any and all claims, Legal actions, and judgments arising out of, or in the course of, the per- formance of this Agreement. 5, Application of department policies. with the opera-I Officers, employees, agents, and volunteers shall comply tional policies of their own department. The parties agree to hold the owns officers, agents, employees, and volunteers, respectively, responsible and accountable fur compliance with operational policies of the employing depart- ment. 6. Retention of benefits. While acting under this Agreement, officers, agents, employees, and vol-I unteers shall have all the inununities from liabilities and exemptions from laws, ordinances, and regulations and shall have all the pension, relief, disability, workers' compensation, and other benefits enjoyed by them while perforn~ing their respective duties within the territorial limits of their political subdivision. 7, iiability for damaKed equipment. Roanoke County shall have no liability for any destruction, loss or dam- age of any Botetourt County-owned or Blue Ridge Volunteer Fire Department- owned motor vehicle, equipment, or personal property and Botetourt County and) Blue Ridge Volunteer hire Department shall have no liability for any destruc- tion, loss, or damage of any Roanoke County-owned motor vehicle, equipment,; or personal property in the exercise of any power under or pursuant to this) Agreement. i a ,~ ... ; A ,'( Jy i Page 3 r """ ~ ~ g, Hinimum training standards. ~ The Blue Ridge Volunteer Fire Department agrees to adhere to Roanoke County minimum training standards. 9. Inmmunities not impaired hereby. I~ This Agreement shall not be construed to impair or affect any sovereigns or governmental immunity or official immunity that may otherwise be availablei to Roanoke County or any officer, agent, or employee of Roanoke County, or toi i Botetourt County or any officer, agent, or employee of Botetourt County. 10. Commencement of agreement. This Agreement shall become effective on 11. Termination of agreement. I Atiy party to this Agreement may terminate same, with or without cause, by giving written notice to the other parties by certified mail, return re- ceipt requested. any termination notice must be given at least sixty (60) days prior to July 1st of arty given year. This Agreement shall continue from year to year unless terminated as indicated above, or all parties mutually agree to terminate. 12. Entire agreement. This Agreement represents the entice and integrated agreement betweeni the parties and supersedes all prior negotiations, representations, or agree-~ ments, either oral or written. This Agreement may be amended only by written) instrument signed by authorized representatives of all parties. j In witness whereof, the parties have executed this Agreement the day and~l year first above written. ~ COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA ~ Attest: Doputy Clock Attest: Deputy Clerk By County Administrator COUNTY OF 80TETOURT, VIRGINIA By County Administrator ;, Page 4 tl~,~r Attest: By BLUE RIDGE VOLUN'LBER FIRE DEPAItTHENTI OF BOTETOURT COUNTY, INC. Chief ROANOKE COUNTY FIRE AND RESCUE DEPARTMEN'P By Chief Attest: ACTION NO. A-92590-4 ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MELDE AT THE ROANOKE OUNTY ADMINISTRAT ON CENTER COUNTY, VIRGINIA HE MEETING DATE: September 25, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: Progress Report and Request for Supplemental Appropriation for the Police Department COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: The Board may recall that I asked for an additional appropriation during the budget process. The decision was made to defer the request until the new Chief arrived. CestinCeas rovalhof staff have done an outstanding job and I am requ g PP these funds. If approved, the Chief and I agree not to ask for additional staff next year. BACKGROUND' The Roanoke County Police Department began operations July 1, 1990. The new department is responsible for County law enforcement and service of all criminaiceatorthe publia occurred as well planned and no disruption in sere SUNIlKARY OF INFORMATION Transition planning for the new operation was detailed. Some additional needs or requests were anticipated, particularly related to personnel. Approximately $200,000.00 in funding was identified to address these needons will become a p t of the permanentebudget. time personnel additi This request provides funding to accomplish four objectives: (1) To increase police visibility/crime deterrence and to reduce response time. (2) To better focus existing personnel efficiency by corresponds with public accident analysis). resources to maximize existing insuring that their assignment demands for service (crime and 1 ~-`~ (3) To satisfy the requirements for Law Enforcement Accreditation which will assist in insuring quality service and lowered liability risk to the taxpayer. (4) To allow continued employment of critical part time personnel until funding in the next years budget can be requested. These positions include a department telephone receptionist (cost shared with the fire department) and some clerical assistance in records and criminal investigations. ALTERNATIVES AND IMPACTS: The police department is labor intensive. Ste s havetalready are a few alternatives to personnel efficiency. P been taken to maximize resource allocation and efficiency. (Attachment 1) The department is currently at full strength with no vacancies. Further service improvements will only c r e acted additional personnels unrealisticng and will require supplemental through the year, i funds. STAFF RECOMI+IENDATION Staff recommends that four additional uniformed polic edfwithra be hired beginning January 1, 1991. They will be equcPP and be police vehicle, radio communications, uniforms, assigned to law enforcement functions. A computer-literate records manager will be hired in November, 1990 to develop a records system and computer tot insure cefficient producing management information necessary personnel and equipment allocation. The department is currently very limited in this are resource aallocation ormation is critical to further improvements in A full-time temporary research analyst will be funded for six months of an anticipated 3-year Law E ersonnel wills a 1 ow tthe project. Several temporary part-time p Department to functioew 1 waenforcementtoperationet the public's expectations for the n The cost to implement for the remainder of this budget year is $200,000 and will come from the Unappropriated Fund Balance (Attachment 2). 2 SUBMITTED BY: n H. Cease Chief of Police APPROVED: ~~~ ~ `' ,, Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ------------ ACTION ---------- VOTE Approved (x) Nickens Motion by: Harry C. - No Eddy Yes Abs x Denied ( ) to a rove staff recommenda Johnson x Received ( ) tion with addition that #4 and 5 if full-time i McGraw x Referred ons posit be extended fringe benefits Nickens x To (#4 Accreditation Specialist Robers x #5-Telephone Receptionist) cc: File John Cease, Chief of Police Reta Busher, Director, Management & Budget Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance Keith Cook, Director, Human Resources 3 ~~~ ACCOMPLISHMENTS SINCE JULY 1, 1990 Attachment 1 1. 30 new vehicles in service; six 1988 equipped police vehicles furnished Sheriff, 14 vehicles surplused 2. Changed the work sThisuhaslresulted i~ ub tantialoovertime and 5 platoons. savings. (see attachment A) 3. Started an Auxiliary Police Academy to meet Accreditation requirements 4. Restructured the DARE officer's assignments and organizational position 5. Reassignment of Sgt ionsn to handle Uwarrants nd Sgt. Swisher to Criminal Investigat 6. Rules and Regulations Manual - have not had for 2 years 7. Policy Review Committee - to provide for employee input and feedback 8. Warrants - increase in responsibility g. Hired 7 police officers 10. Hired 3 communications officers 11. Mr. Meredith to worDivisioncreditation and Sgt. Swortzel assigned to Services 12. Improved inter-department relations 13. Improved public perceptions 14. Revised Communications schedule) Officer's work schedule (to a 6-2 15. Initiated a new filing system for offense reports in the Services Division 16. Revamped supply room in the Services Division to run more effectively 17. Starting to de-bug a new PC based evidence tracking system 1g. Twenty-five general orders researched, written, and put into effect ~-`~ Q +~ a~ U cd +-~ Q .~ a ~ ~ w ~~~ ~ ~` ~ O ~ ~ M ~ ~ M ir') N M O O M i N N ~ ~ O V7 ~ ~ ~ n tl') N ~ N N N H,LNOW AS ~Y~IIZ2I~n0 S2if10H 30 # ~-`~ SPECIAL APPROPRIATIONS Attachment 2 The following is my determination as to how the special appropriation should be allocated. 1. Hire four (4) new officers January 1, 1991 (includes vehicles, radios, uniforms, etc.) $125,429 2. Reclassification; effective November 1, 1990: 666 A. One clerk to secretary 2,203 g. Two sergeant reclassification in CID 1,946 C. Detective On Call pay 3, Record Personnel 13,714 p,, Records Manager Subcontract) 6,400 g. Computer Consultant To provedessarhnforlfulleimplementationnofsthe ware, n Y CAD system. 18,128 4. Accreditation Specialist - October 1, 1990 Temporary position - duties will be to implement the Accreditation Program and coordinate police officer training. 5,000 5. Telephone Receptionist Expense will be shared with Fire Department. Necessary to provide public access to Southview as well as citizen contact with the departments by phone. (Temporary Employee) 8,800 6. Temporary Clerical Position To provide assistance in typing and other office duties as required due to increased work load. ~~age : 2 Special Appropriations Attachment 2 ~, Computer Equipment To provide the necessary computer equipment to track data required for efficient police operations. g, Overtime To provide additional overtime funds due to an unrealistic overtime budget allocation. 17-~I 11,300 6,414 / 1 av ~~ ACTION NO. _~ ITEM NUMBER ..L''ti% AT A EGG NIAMHELDNAT THEHROANORE COUNTYEADMINISTRATION CENTER COIINTY, VIR MEETING DATE: September 25, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: Request to Accept and Appropriate Grant to Fund Program for Drug Abuse Treatment for Adult Drug Dependent Offenders BACKGROUND: Due to overcrowding in the state prison system, the Virginia Department of fences lof smore than esix tyearsep Those onot naccepted those with se must be confined in local facilities. Thlshas lresultedhin ha increased emphasis on drug law enforcement, significant increase in the number of drug dependent offenders confined to our local jail for extended periods of time. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The County has applied for and received approval for a grant of $57,705 to implement a program of rehabilitation for drug dependent inmates as well as "aftercare" support following release. The proposed has the trong support of Judge Apostolou with drug offenders and The underlying concept for this proposal is that something more productive than the mere "warehousing" of drug offenders can and should be done. Aside from the social benefits, it is felt that thousands of dollars could potentially be saved as the result of shorter but more productive periods of incarceration and a reduced return rate. A vital element of the concept is that post release care would nuld belmonitoredvanddensured by dthee Courtsquirement. Compliance wo The proposal is to employ a professional staff to administer treatment in a rehabilitation module within the jail facility. An appropriate ass salva eable offendersulKey features of the program target the most g are: o Separate areas for housing and daily activities of the program participants. o A daily schedule structured to maximize productive time. -.~ o Maximized use of other in-house rehabilitative and educational facilities within the jail to enhance offender preparation for return to the community. o Use of available services from local community agencies to develop and administer a post release program for inmates and their families. The initial effort would be confined to one cell and viewed as a pilot program with 12 or less participants. The staff would include two trained professionals. Our plan is to use temporary or sub-contract professional services for program implementation and a trial period of approximately one year. At the end of that period we would evaluate program status to determine its future direction. Grant funds are available for four years. Our goal is to provide a program with a successful completion rate of 50 percent or better. We would also plan for expansion of the pilot program, not only in our own facility, but to have it serve as a prototype for other jail facilities across the state. FISCAL IMPACT: Budget Catectory Personnel (Counsellors) Consultants (Psychologist and Psychiatrist) Travel & Subsistence Supplies & Other Expenses TOTALS DCJS County Amount Match Totals $36,900 $12,300 $49,200 9,375 3,125 12,500 180 60 240 11,250 3,750 15,000 57 705 $19,235* 76 940 *pmount required from fund balance The Sheriff plans to solicit additional funds from area businesses. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the grant be accepted by the County of Roanoke and that appropriations (revenue and expenditure) be approved to authorize the spending of these grant proceeds. Submitted by: y iG~'z`. .-'~J Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator r ~. 1 ~~ ~ ..r ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Eddy Johnson Received ( ) McGraw Referred Nickens to Robers ACTION ,~ A-92590-5 ITEM NUMBER ,u -'" AT A VIRG NIA HELDNAT THEHROANO E COUNTY, MEETING DATE: September 25, 1990 OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER AGENDA ITEM: Acceptance am Anti-Drug Abuse Grant for Neighborhood Watch Prog COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ant. I the Board has already approved the additional Recommend approval of this gr f appropriation for the Police Department, matching funds will not be required. Otherwise, the $7,963 local match will be needed. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The eourant in the amount f $23x901 from been awarded an anti drug abus g rant requires the Department of C7 963 al Thetgrantewould be Tused to expand the a local match of $ , reassigning an individual current Neighborhood Watch program by and by purchasing needed from another law enforcement activity computer equipment. This is the first years two throughtfourathe to be a four year grant program. In Y grant will decline to a 50/5011abehdisconti ued Lo Even though this year four the grant funds w is anticipated to be a four year program there is no guarantee that it will be funded beyond the current bi-annum. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recoomme2ds901candlappropriatingnthe Drug Abuse Grant in the amount ro riated balance. local match of $7,963 from the unapp p Elmer C. Hodge Diane D. Hyatt County Administrator Director of Finance ----- ---------------- VOTE ------------ ACTION No Yes Abs Approved (x ) Motion by: ~~ rr~-- ~" `~kPn~ Eddy Denied ( ) to acce t rant Johnson Received ( ) McGraw Referred ( ) Nickens To Robers cc: File Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance Reta Busher, Director, Management & Budget John Cease, Chief of Police X x x x x ACTION N0. A-92590-6 ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETINT OHE TROANOKERCOIINTY ADMINISTRA O ONRO~OER COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD MEETING DATE: September 25, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: Request for Funding from TAP for Transitional Living Center ~yNLy7'~L~* ~~~ COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S CO/MM~~E))NTS: ~Cccv ~~~ ~iai7 _.W~/~ ~'Z LJ EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The County has received a letter from ear, rwhicht begins appropriation of $15,000 for their fiscal Y re uested from December 1, 1990. The monies which are being q several public and privats of t is facil ty will be used to match a HUD Grant for operation BACKGROUND• The Transitional Living Center is completingesidentsrdailyr of operation and currently averages sixty (60) FY90-91 Overall, TAP will be using approximately $410,000 during to operate the center at its maximum level of services. This request for funding was not included P r APr ated asaa budget request to the County which has been a p p separate line item for several years. FISCAL IMPACT: Selection of Alternative #1 would require a $15,000 appropriation from the Board Contingency Fund. ALTERNATIVES: Alternative #1: Appropriate $15,000 from the Board Contingency Fund, which may be used by TAP to match said Grant. Alternative #2: Give to TAP a statement of intent to appropriate $15,000 so that they may use it against the match for the Grant, however, actually pay the cash from the 1991-92 fiscal year budget. Alternative #3: Do not appropriate monies for this purpose. ~,? STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Alternative #1 with the proviso that TAP be advised that this appropriation is a one time situation and to submit future requests as a part of the normal budget cycle for the County. Respectfully submitted, ~~ ~~~ / John M. Cha liss, Jr. Assistant Administrator Approved by, J ti,,~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator -------- --------- VOTE ACTION Approved (x) Motion by. Harry C. Nickens amended No Yes Abs x Denied ( ) to a rove Staff Alternative Eddy Received ( ) #1 with understanding that Johnson ~-- Referred ( ) re uests for funds be initiatellcGraw ~.- To ( ) from TAP as they feel appro- Nickens ~- riate Burin current fiscal Robers year cc: File John Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance Reta Busher, Director, Management & Budget ~. A-92590-7 ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER .._~- AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANORE OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: September 25, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: Proposed Creation of a Recycling Advisory Committee COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND: The Board of Supervisors has requested the use of a citizen's advisory committee in the develop eeuse of alcptizentcommi tee has Roanoke County Recycle Program ro ects in which both been a successful technique in past County p 7 private and commercial inter bu finesses f to t partic pate o inltthe would enable citizens and formulation of the recycling aspect of the comprehensive solid waste plan. The plan must be completed, approved, and submitted to the Commonwealth of Virginia by June 30, 1991. Citizen participation would begin as early as September, pending board appointment and approval. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The staff has proposed an eight member committee with particiurtose from both the private committeerisadetailedsin the attachmentpand and membership of th the County will include board appointments, staff designations by Administrator and Superintendent of Schools and Clean Valley Council members. FISCAL IMPACT' _ f fiscal Minimum impact is a rom lcommittee m recommlendations•are nunknown. impacts resulting f and basic Committee members uses and staff time should be absorbed. administrative expe ALTERNATIVES: None. 1 ... ,~,~ _°° STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board establish committee and appoint members as identified in attachme ed bCoSeptemb r 251 1990 Boardcmeeting. Members should be appoint y Approved by, Respectfully submitted, ,. ~cu~~p~ ~ ~~ ,.~ Elmer C. Hodge Gardner W. Smith, Director Count Administrator Department of General Services Y _____ ---------- -------------------------ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs Approved (x) Motion by: Richard W. Robers x Denied ( ) to a rove staff recommenda-Johnson x Received ( ) tion McGraw x Referred ( ) Nickens x To ( ) Robers x cc: File Gardner Smith, Director, General Services John Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator 2 '~ THE ROANOKE COUNTY RECYCLE ADVISORY COMMITTEE The staff proposes the following scope, purpose and membership for the committee: SCOPE The Recycle Advisory Committrec clingh wi hpnlthe totale Roanoke issues pertaining to refuse y County staff and sch ctionbanddcommercialrrecycle collection. residential recycle colle PURPOSE To increase citizen awareness and participation in recycling. To provide citizen input on the County recycle plan. To review the recycle portion of the solid waste ploals. To monitor the County progress toward the recycle g To aid in the implementation of County recycle policies. To provide the board periodic reports on County recycling. MEMBERSHIP There will be eight (8) members on the committee. membership will be as follows: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. The committee One member from the Board of Supervisors - board selected. businesses and two lay Four citizens (two from County citizens) - board appointees. One member from the Countyyschools staff neSuperintendent One member selectee. One member from Clean Valley Council - coordinated with council by County staff. ATTACHMENT 1 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. ~~-4 AT A REGULAR MEETIID AT THE ROANOKE OCOUNTY ADMINISTRP,TIOON OCENTER COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HE MEETING DATE: September 25, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: Requests for Public Hearing and First Reading for Rezoning Ordinances Consent Agenda COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND' The first reading on these ordinancesconsent agenda itemsy adoption of these ordinances in the manner of a royal of the The adoption of these items does not imply PP rather substantive content of the requested zoning actions, approval satisfies the procedural requirements of and second Charter and schedules the required public hearing reading of these ordina scheduled for Octobers 2 a 990b1ic hearing on these ordinances ss The titles of these ordinances are as follows: 1. An ordinance to rezone 1.301 acres from R-1 to R-3 to allow apartments, located on Feather Road at VA 24, Vinton Magisterial District, upon the petition of W. E• Cundiff. 2. An ordinance to rezone 7.8 acres from R-1 to R-3 to allow townhouses, located on Hardy Road near Wolf Creek, Vinton Magisterial District, upon the petition of Steve Brown. 3. An ordinance to rezone 12.3 acres from R-1 to R-E to allow a golf course, located along Wolf Creek between Hardy Road and VA 24, Vinton Magisterial District, upon the petition of Steve Brown. G i-4 2 4, An ordinance to rezone approximately 125 acres from M-1 to M-2 and to amend the Future Land Use Plan map designation of approximately 175 acres from Development to Principal Industrial to allow industrial development, located south of the intersection of Uandladjacentsto and Street) and Route 612 (Barley Drive) west of the N&W Railway, Catawba Magisterial District, upon the petition of Industrial Development Authority. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends as follows: of (1) That the Board approve and adopt the first reading these rezoning ordinances for the purpose of scheduling the second reading and public hearing for October 23L 1990. and hereby is, (2) That this section of the agenda be, approved and con;u4redinclusive e andlthats the Clerk ses forth as Items ~ law to set authorized and directed where required by forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this action. Respectfully submitted, ~~.~ ~~ Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney Vote Action No yes Abs Motion by Eddy Approved ( ) Johnson Denied ( ) McGraw Received ( ) Nickens Referred Robers to _~ ~..~ ~ if Date Rec.:~_=~__.- Received By: ___ Case No.: Ord. No.: ROANOKE COUNTY REZONING APPLICATION , ~/ ,C' ~i~n/a~FF Phone: 3~'1 ' SSSS 1. Owner's Name: Address : 8 Po G ~A~D S-T'- ~^"~ Phone : 3 ~~-sS~S 2 , pppl icant' s Name : //~ = Cc->~-/ Di~F Address: ^,~ 3 , Location of Property : Te ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ Tax Map Number (s) : ~/• ~~ - Z - Z s 4. Magisterial District: -~NTc 5. Size of Property: / :3 n/ ac.~s 6. Existing Zoninq: Q- Existing Land Use: v<<<. ~f ~~~~~ 7. Proposed Zoning: Q- 3 Proposed Land Use: M~ - ~^~% 8 . Comprehensive Plan Designation: .~ ~ ~ `'' ~ ~ ` ~T 9. Are Conditions Proffered With This Request? Yes No (If you are voluntarily offering proffers as a part of your applica- tion, these proffers must be in writing. a member of the Planning Staff can assist you in the preparation ~ these proffers.) 10. Value of Land and (Proposed) Buildings: 3c~= o00 11. The Following Items Must Be Submitted With This Application. Please Check If Enclosed. Application Will Not Be Accepted If Any Of These Items Are Missing Or Incomplete: Letter of Application - Concept Plan List of Adjacent Owners Metes and Bounds Description Vicinity Map of Property (Attach Exhibit A) ~ Written Proffers Application Fee If Applicable) Water and Sewer Application ( 12. Signature Of Property Owner, Contract Purchaser, Or Owner's Accent: ul Date- o% / Z 7 i99o Signature -- -- ---- ::.: ,.,. Q ~ V Z ~ ~ ~ ~ wwJJ ~ ~ ~ w 2 ~K~ ~'. t~' i Z f L ~ .2;i.:.i:~t ;i..ti ~~;~ is ~:2 ~ !j~ I ~i~i~ ~':~~ ti i ~ ~/ n~ ~~~ ~ t. ~. ~' ,rr,~ :. e ,~ a' ~; ~;~ ~-i ].) 1 , = 14 i ! ` tt t I ~ ~ ~~~,.,~_ 1 I .~- 1 y .~ i~~ ~~ ~~ ~.~ I i~~ J ~ ~~~ I =1i '' ~~i ' ~ I l.~ ~1~` !~i .~~, ,!1 %:11 i ; ',i ~ , ~, 'lI~.I~i~~ I Vli '~1 ,! ~/ , I 1= 1 i !\~ s ~' i~ .; `'~ .~ ~*' .~ ~,I ,~ ``~ I '~ ~ ~ ~~~ t e• .~ V e~ •;1 :„ ~ ~ _ _ Date Rec.: = ~ ~ , k~~ Received By ~~ _ M Case No.: ' ~ Ord . No . '_ ~~_~, ~ ~. ROANOKF'"'~~~ZONING APPLICATION L ~ ~ `'' ~ ~r,E ~''' ~,x+~~! . E. Cun~DiF~ Phone : 703- 3~y- 5585 1. Owner's Name: Sf: I ~ fa A. z¢o79 Address : //8 ~o/~A ~ 'S f ede ~3i"ow~ - Phone :703- 3~~-SSgs 2.~Applicant's Name: f y. z ~0 79 Address : /g Po /~~~~ ~ ~ Y/~ o~ 3. Location of Property: 4r'd ~Poac~ ~Va. ~~c_ G3~~ e4~`t/°/~'Ci~~ek Tax Map Number(s) : ~/. !6 -Z.-25 a G/ /8 - Z-25. / 4. Magisterial District: r 5. Size of Property: 7 8 Acres 6. Existing Zoning: R-~ Existing Land Use: 1~1r~ arc ~e% Gc/ 7. Proposed Zoning: ~ 3 Proposed Land Use: %owhhocise oar rehensive Plan Designation: ~clCr H ~_ ~ - ~` C~='r''~~~ ~~ ~~ 8. C p No 9. Are Conditions Proffered With This Request? Yes coffers as a part of your applica- (If you are voluntarily offering p tion, these proffers must be in w ation of t ese proffersh) Planning Staff can assist you in the prepay of Land and (Proposed) Buildings: '7.50 oDo 10. Value Items Must Be Submitted With This Application. Please 11. The Following lication Will Not Be Accepted If Any Of These Check If Enclosed.O=PI complete• Ztems Are Missing lication .~ Concept Plan ~ Letter of App ,i List of Adjacent Owners _~ Metes and Bounds Description ~ Vicinity Map of Property (Attach Exhibit A) Written Proffers r Application Fee - E`=' lication (If Applicable) Water and Sewer App 12. Signature Of Property ow r Contract Purchaser, Or Owner's Ag t: /~~/~ Date ~q~sf Z3 /9~TvZ3 /9~Tv Signature "^""'~/~ --- t ~~ ~~Z ~ a° "2~ .~ ~v ~ ~ ti e ~~~ ~ ~h ~. . " ~ ~ ~ l W; e . ~~<< y J~~~~~°~ ~`r ~~ao~~~v-$ ~~~_ O~~ ~ t~' ~ ,,..~ 0 • ~ ~ a ~~,~ +. ~ ~ ,, c . ~ Q ., ~ , ,1 ~ T ~~ \ , ,~ ~ O ~ 1 1 ,, ' ~, _ ', ~ i ,' ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ,L_ ~ ~ • ..y ~ ~• ~, ; ~ 1 ~ ~ ~; ~ ~ ,'1 ` t ' ~~ "~ ~ ~ ~t • ' ~ ' ~ ;~ ~ ~ ; ~ 1 a ~ ~ i ~ , . ~ ~~ S ~. • ~ \. , ~, , r S /~ ' ' r ~ ~ ~ o: - C ® ~ 'Or.' 0 -m~ r ;~ r ` ~ + I .~ ~~ ,~ 1 ~; ~ 0 ~ ;; 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ //~ -Y YJ i -' ~ i '~~i /~ ~ r ~ ` , / ~ o ~~'------''~ it ~~ / ~ ~~ 1 ~; .s~~ ~• ~ t ;i' ~~ y ~~t" ~ ~~Y ~ C: ~ C"r~ •M ~~~~ yj Y ~;~ ~~ ~'$~:~ ~~ g~~ 0 ~ ~ ~~~~ ~, g~~ ~$ E ~~ ~ yR ~~o :~~~~~~~~3~ ~ q~k~" ~;~~N~~ ~~~ ~ .~ ~ a~"~~ - ~ N4 ~ ~`~ 1 T t I a~ iG ":~ 1990 ~UNTY ~:.rr: ct, RO~O~ , r, ~~~.~ ~~ REZONING APPLICATION ~-- 3 Date Rec.: __ Received By: Case No.: Ord. No.. 1. Owner' s Name : ~ E CuND/~f Phone : 7v3-3 ~~ SSBs Address: ~8 Po«A,QD ~r yi,~ro~ I~i-~ z X079 2 . Applicant's Name: ~T~ yE %~,eor~n~ _ Phone:7o3-3~/y S's~s Address:11B ~OLLA2IJ ~T, !~/Nryni, //A. Z~o79 3. Location of Property: A/d~~ ~~~/~Cr~cK h~fwe~n ~Q~~~~P~ a~J l/~.,~~.~~ Tax Map Number (s) : ~/ /B - Z - ZS G~~ G/ i8 - 2 - ZOO 4. Magisterial District: (~/NTDN 5. Size of Property: /Z 3 gores 6. Existing Zoning: .Q / - Existing Land Use: G!~%/e%,oec~ 7. Proposed Zoning: ~P~ Proposed Land Use : 6 0/~' CoN/'se 8. Comprehensive Plan Designation: ~~,•~c.er~r--i~t-c - 9. Are Conditions Proffered With This Request? Yes No (If you are voluntarily offering proffers as a part of your applica- tion, these proffers must be in writing. A member of the Planning Staff can assist you in the preparation of these proffers.) 10. Value of Land and (Proposed) Buildings: '~2av Doo 11. The Following Items Must Be Submitted With This Application. Please Check If Enclosed. Application Will Not Be Accepted If Any Of These Items Are Missing Or Incomplete: ~ Letter of Application i Concept Plan r Metes and Bounds Description r List of Adjacent Owners of Property (Attach Exhibit A) ~ Vicinity Map ~ Application Fee - written Proffers ~_ Water and Sewer Application (If Applicable) 12. Signature Of Property ne Contract Purchaser, Or Owner's Ag t: Signature / Date ~Gr7~rs~ z 3 l T9o -T ~~ ,. 1 Luck Avenue e, ENGINEERS F-Ranoke. Vi~ginie 24011 0 P ANNERSS (703) 343-6665 ~:-~< (703) 345-1519 (Fax) .Municipal Services • ; ~,;~ ~` -. - . Commercial 6 Rsstdent~al8ite Dsvebpment ~:. ~t ,,. - • Boundary. Topopraph~c,s• Lose Burveys ;,;, . ' ~°- .Water Systems ~ , ~, ~'~ ~,;~ 'fir ,_. . As-Built and Downtown Surveys - L .~ , . '..~ . Auquat 24, 1990 _.,~ .;...,, . ,:~.._ Planning Departme>r~~ _; Roanoke _.CouatY -;'= ~_ 3738 Brambleton I-vanue -: Roanoke, Virginia'`'`" 24018 Att: M~ ..Janet 3c id _ - R_, _ _~. .: RE: W• E. Cundiff Rezoning ?ax Parcel 61.18-2-25 b 26 _ ~~~- 5 l Dear Ms . Scheid : - - - ~- ,::. Hr. W. E. Cundiff is =equestinq that a 12.3-acre parcei,'of land lying adiacent to Wolf Creek between Hardy Road- and Va. route 24 be rezoned from R-1 to RE. This is undeveloped, land.~.:~s:_not particularly suitable to development, howeve=, a pereitte use in the RE zone is a public golf course. die propose to conatxuct_a olf course within thia.. 12.3. acre tract - ieh will°. .zov~id_e t additional recreation face.-~I~~.~~~'~er ~ _ ~~ ~, <. :_ ~ some otherwise idle land. ~ :_ __ All the required maps, documents, applications, and fees are attached. ~ -- { ~s ~_ ~~. , ,~~ - Cord iii . - Fred ~~~8hanka~ 1~I~.. ~: ~~ ,~,: ..~ ; ,i:<~ .tea.-r~ .~ _ ti Rh r~ ~, ` ` t•t y i l i ~ ' ~_~ ~ ~~~ Q Y ~ ~ 111'~ ~ V 6 ~ i ~~ ! i ~ Y` O • ~~ \ +/ ,, ~ , t ~ ~. ' `" 1 J ~~ ~ +~~ ~a ra • ~ ~ ~ 2~ L y Z 1 !y .+~ a t ~ ~ ,~ ~~ ~ E a ~~ ~ . . s l + • ~~1~ ra ti ~ 1 `~~" ur ~ v ~. i` J ~ ~ ~ A ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ``~ ~ ~. ~ ,~ ~ _ r ? j~ ,~ ~-- f .. e t _.- ~ a~ ~ J • ~ ~ , ~~ ' •' i t ~~ ~ • w 2 .~ !j' 2 ~ r • ~ ~~ ~ i"~i~ ~ ~` ~ + ~ ~ ~ s i''// `• ~1f ~ j~h' e . ~ `~ ~• *Y ~ (r~~ , ' fn, iii ;~ !} r •i~~ ~, •i ~ s ~ ] ~ y ?I s y ` y .. G3 . `: II ~~ GJ. rr~ O~ i ~~ L' ,~ ~, .~ ~ ~;i /` / . '~ NORTH ~- \ ~ _~ ~~ --- ~ ~~~ ....~ 1 • i ~ • ~ ~- r ,~ ~ - ~ . ~ ~ ~• ~ ~ O 1 ~ / ~• / , , • `- • ~. • • ~ ~• • • . • ~ ~~ • ~' ~• • / • • • • ~ •• • ~ • ! 1 ~• ` '~ s •• ~• ~ ' O .~ n ~' .S. r 1 „_ . ~~ .. a+ ~~~ 'M' 1 y , ` Y1 1 ~ , ` \~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~• \, ~ ~ . ~-~. ~ ` ~ .i. ~ `. t . ~: ,r COM,tUNITY SERVICES ANDDEVELOPMENT ~ • ~ ~ ~ • • • ~• ___ ~ ~ r • • ~ ~ • ' f ', 1 ~ ~ • ~ i AGL 'PRot~'Rt`~ tS 9 ~ '' , ' ~oNEd 'RBI UNt.ESS I ~ o-rH~w~sE No~sv. .~• :~ STEVE BROWN R-1 to RE G-`I Date Rec.:_ Received By: Case No.: Ord. No.: ROANORE COUNTY LAND IISE PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATION (703) 380-2001 George H, Fitzwater phone: (704) 334-2709 1. Owner's Name: Pro erties Inc. (703) 344-5113 Salem-West Corporation Address: Route 1 Box l0A Elliston VA 24087 NC 28207; P.0. Box 8597, Roanoke, VA 24014 2305 Randolph Road, Charlotte, thori A phone: (703) 772-2069 ty 2. u Applicant's Name: - --- -~ '~P~~Ploument of Roanoke County Address: p n Box 29800 Roanoke VA 24018-0798 3. Location of Property: Glenvar West Number(s) • 64.02-2-53; 64.02-2-54; 64.02-6, 50, 51, 52 Tax Map 4. Magisterial District: Catawba 5. Size of Property: 175+ acres 6. M1 C and M2 Existing Zoning: 7. Industrial and vacant Existing Land Uses: 8. Existing Comprehensive Plan Designation: Development g Proposed Comprehensive Plan Designation: Principal Industrial . 10 The Following Items Must Be Submitted With This Application. . Of t Be Accepted If Any Please These Check If Enclosed. Application Will No Items Are Missing Or Incomplete. Letter of Application Application Fee List of Adjacent Owners Vicinity Map Statement of Justification m lete below.) (Please cop , se ex lain, in detail, how this request conforms to ';the Land ~ 11. Plea p ~.~.~, Use '°Det~r~inants of the Roanoke County` r Comprehensive ;~.~; P1 an: The followin land use determinants ertain to this land use reclassifi- cation• Existing Land Use Pattern, Existing Zoning, Potential Industrial ~ 9t~ :: ~ a~~ ~ ~ --~- ,,.. ~ ~ Site, `Flood Hazard Prevention, Resource~sProtection, Access and Transportation ~~ ~ ,~ ,' ~ ~ #. ~~ ,~, Center. ~'~' ~ r ~~ ~ ~'et ., `~~u t w s,, ,4 ~" k.=` ~ , '~ ROANpf ~ '~../ ~~ ~ ~; ~~~it~~~e . ~ ~~ ~~ C~u~t Z ~ ~ z v a DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 18 E50 88 S~SQUICEN7ENN~~~ A Beautiful Btginning M E M O R A N D U M TO: Terry Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning FROM: Charlie Saul, Chairman,~dustrial Development Authority of Roanoke Countyc~~~y~! DATE: August 31, 1990 SUBJECT: Land Use Plan Amendment the Industrial Development Authority of Roanoke As you know, County, of which I serve as Chairman, has recently optioned severa tracts of land from threokelCountytand iss presentlyrzonedyMlsand the Glenvar area of Roan M2. Additionally, a portion of the land we have optioned is being presented to your office for rezoning. We feel that the aforem re i° lease request the Planning commission industrial site. Therefo , P .s Land Use Plan from the to consider amending Roanoke County Development category to Principal Industrial for the following tracts: 64.02-2-5, 50, 51, 52, 53 and 54. Finally, a majority of the land in this request as well as the adjacent land is presently zoned for industrial purposes. By amending the Land Use Plan, future development will correspond with existing zoning. sbo P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE ,VIRGINIA 24018-0798 (703) 772-2069 FAX. NO.: (703) 772-2030 ~-y LAND USE Properties, Inc. 2305 Randolph Road Charlotte, NC 28207 64.02-2-54 George H. Fitzwater Route 1, Box 10-A Elliston, VA 24087 64.02-2-53 Atwell H. & Lucille 4626 W. Main Street Salem, VA 24153 64.02-2-4 Edward Bruce Hill 4632 W. Main Street Salem, VA 24153 64.02-2-5 Helen Cox Richards p.O. Box 14 Salem, VA 24153 64.02-2-8, 9, 49 ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS O. W. Poff Route 3, Box 189 Salem, VA 24153 64.02-1-55 Jerrico, Inc. Route 2, Box 156 Winchester, VA 22601 64.02-1-54 H. Freese Ruby Pate Perdue 4879 Poor Mountain Road Salem, VA 24153 64.02-1-52 Blanche Brewster Pedneau 7798 Starlight Lane Boones Mill, VA 24065 64.02-2-55 Mary W. Bohon 4413 Westward Lake Drive Salem, VA 24153 64.04-3-25 Ray E. Coleman 4773 Poor Mountain Road Salem, VA 24153 64.02-1-57, 58 Timothy T. & Eglenna C. Gibson 4821 Poor Mountain Road Salem, VA 24153 64.02-1-56 Nelson Roanoke Corporation 901 11th Street, NE Roanoke, VA 24012 64.04-3-2.1 G-`f Site Haas: Salem West Zoning: M~, Comprehensive plan Designation: Principal Industrial !-ccess: Route 11/460 Water: 0!! site Sewer: o!! sits availability: Property is available !or sale. Reconnmendation: Rezone remainder o! site Extend sewer service to site. ~i v ~. L l \ 1. ~.- • ___ __... __.. . Received By : ____ Case No.: - Ord. No.: ROANOKE COUNTY REZONING APPLICATION 1. Owner's Name: Salem-West Cor oration G-~ Phone: (703) 344-5113 Address: c/o P.0. Box 8591, Roanoke, VA 24014 2. Applicant's Name: Industrial Development Authority phone: r~n31. 772-2069 0 oano a un y, rg n a Address: B 2 800 Roanoke VA 24018 3. Location o! Property: Glenvar West Tax Map Number(s) : 64 02-2-51 52 and art 50 4. Magisterial District: Catawba 5. Size of Property: 125+ acres 6. E~tisting Zoning: _ Mic Existing Land Use: Vacant 7. Proposed Zoning: M2C Proposed Land Use: Industrial Development 8. Comprehensive Plan Designation: Principal Industrial and Development 9. Are Conditions pro!lered Kith This Request? Yes No ` (If you are voluntarily offering proffers as a part of your applica- tion, these proffers suss in rriting. a member of the Planning Staff can assist you in preparation of these proffers.) N/A 10. Value o! Land and (Proposed) Buildings: 11. The Following Iteas Must Be Subsitted With This Application. Please Check If Enclosed. Application FTill Not Be Accepted If Any Of These Itess Are Missing Or Inco'plete: Letter o! Application >~-~.~ Concept Plan Metes and Bounds Description List of Adjacent Owners of Property (Attach Exhibit A) Vicinity Map Application Fee r~-,~ Written Proffers Water and Sewer Application (If Applicable) 12. Signature Of Property Owner, Contract Purchaser, _ _ Or Owner's Agent: ~ ~?.,~o ~, ~~`t o F ~oo-~..oke C.o~~..ry ~ U ~RdtNr~ ~-.r M1 V ST ~'Q' ~ ~' ~ Date g ~ ti ~ 9 0 Signature - ~ P~ANO,YF ~ C.s ~n Z ~ ~ a ,~ DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMEN 18 ~ 88 SFSOV~cEx~NN~~~ A Beauti~ul8eginning M E M O R A N D II M TO: Terry Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning Charlie Saul, Chairman, dustrial Development Authority FROli of Roanoke County DATE: August 31, 1990 SIIB.TECT: Rezoning of Salem-West Corporation Property The Industrial Development Authority of Roanoke ur hase land held I am the President, recently signed an option to p by the Salem-West Corporation in the Glenvar area of Roanoke County. For your information, we have also optioned two adjoining tracts. We plan to market these tracts as one site for the purpose of enticing a large single industrial user to the Roanoke Valley. While the two additionally optioned tracts and a portion of the Salem-West optioned land are zoned M-2, we feel that We feellthat easier to market if the proposed site had one zoning- Therefore, its highest and best use will be as anlication for the purpose of please accept the attached rezoning app rezoning land held by the Salem-West Corporation and optioned to the Industrial Development Authority of Roanoke County from M-1, Light Industrial, to M-2, General Industrial. If you have any questions regarding this request, please feel free to contact me. sbo P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE .VIRGINIA 24018-0798 (703) 772-2069 FAX. NO.: (703) 772-2030 G-~- In the space below, please type in the metes and bounds legal description of the property requested for rezoning• you are cresponsible foe bounds description of the property does not exist, obtaining an accurate description prior to submittal of a rezoning request. Your application will not be accepted without this description. The metes and bounds description must coincide with the area depicted on the concept plan. As an alternative to completing this form, you may provide us this information on a 5 1/4 inch floppy disk composed in Wordperfect 5.0 format. ~ Industrial Develo went Authority Date: 8_ 31~9~ Owner s Name: P DESCRIPTION: of Roanoke County ,. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: Beginning at Corner 23, an iron pin located in an old fence line and being the common corner with the south line of a 50 foot right-of-way and also, being a common corner with Daniel Wentworth Richards; thence with the south line of said right-ot-way in an easterly direction N. 86° 39' 49" E. 951.31 teat in all to corner 24, an iron pin; thence continuing with the east line in a northerly line N. 10° 51' 17" W. 837.94 teet to corner 25, an iron pin; thence leaving said 50 toot right-of- way and with property of Daniel Wentworth Richards, deceased (Deed Book 869, page 171); thence in an easterly direction 74° 36' 05" E. 1,493.81 teat to corner 26, an iron pin; thence N. 30° 25' 23" 206.00 teet; thence N. 17° 20' 23" E. 263.00 teat; thence S. 10° 55' 57" E. 2,192.42 test (along coning line) bearing lett o! corner 16 and an iron pin; thence continuing in a westerly direction 8. 13° 45' 07" M. 1,192.90 teat to corner 17; thence to 18 (maple snag) N. 69° 45' 04" W.; thence N. 76° 46' 26" N. 1,226.95 test passing through a gum tree; thence N. 83° 29' 15" W. 1,52.54 teat to corner 20 and existing iron pint thence N. 3° 16' 13" W. to corner 21 and existing iron pins thence N. 88° 55' 47' E. 433.61 lest to corner 22 and white oak tree at spring; thence N. 7. 14' 53" W. 629.52 lest to the place of beginning. ROAHOICE COUNTY UTILITY DEPARTMENT APPLICATION FOR WATER OR SEWER SERVICE TO PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Date 8/31/90 Name of Applicant G-~ Industrial Development AuthorityphOne (703) 772-2069 of Roanoke County Address of Applicant P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 Industrial Development Authority same as above Name of Developer Phone 0 oano Same as above Address of Developer Name of Design Engineer Roanoke County Utility phone (703) 387-6104 Department Address of Design Engineer Clifford Craig Name of Contact Person Charles Saul, Chairman Name of Proposed Development Salem-West Corporation Type of Development and proposed number of units (Be specific) n st ial Location of proposed development (Furnish copy of map): Glenvar-West section of Roanoke County 185.80+ Acres Size of proposed development in acres: - Give minimum and maximum elevation (Use USGS Elevations) at which the individual water/sewer service connections would be located: Minimum N/A feet MSL. Maximum NIA feet MSL Is this application for a development that will be a part or section of a larger future development? x No Yes If yes, provide map of entire area if available. ~ovEa) Si nature o Applicant _~ Gars- r •s g, .~.,iS,,,. . ,0.~ ,, . ,Q,,,~~G-~ ~ • y ~~~ O~ ~OA.tip~.~ ~~ ~~~ ~~ . . ~ ~~ ~~ ~~~ Z ~ ~ z a DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ~ 8 ~ 88 ~4FSQUICEN'~ENN`P~' A Bcauti(ulBcginning M E M O R A N D II M Terry Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning TO: dustrial Development Authority FROM: Charles Saul, Chairm of Roanoke County DATB: August 31, 1990 gpgJBCT; Concept Plan - Salem-West Corporation Property At this time, the Industrial Development Authority lan RoWhile County is unable to provide your office with a concept p we feel that this site has valueVe~ aaslresidents oft thee Roanoke plan to be the developers. Howe ~ future development of this Valley, we will work to ensure that any site is done with the utmost respect and care for the environment, residents and Valley. sbo P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE . VIRGINIA 24018-0798 (703) 772-2069 FAX. NO.: (703) 772-2030 c--~ ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS Properties, Inc. 230 5 Randolph Road Charlotte, NC 28207 64.02-2-54 George H. Fitzwater Route 1, Box 10-A Elliston, VA 24087 64.02-2-53 Atwell H. & Lucille H. Freese 4626 W. Main Street Salem, VA 24153 64.02-2-4 Edward Bruce Hill 4632 W. Main Street Salem, VA 24153 64.02-2-5 Helen Cox Richards P.O. Box 14 Salem, VA 24153 64.02-2-8, 9, 49 Blanche Brewster Pedneau 7798 Starlight Lane Boanes Mill, VA 24065 64.02-2-55 Mary W. Bohon 4413 Westward Lake Drive Salem, VA 24153 64.04-3-25 Ray E. Coleman 4773 Poor Mountain Road Salem, VA 24153 64.02-1-57, 58 Timothy T. & Eglenna C. Gibson 4821 Poor Mountain Road Salem, VA 24153 64.02-1-56 Nelson Roanoke Corporation 901 11th Street, NE Roanoke, VA 24012 64.04-3-2.1 G-`~ Site name: Salem West Zoning: Cosprehensive plan Designation: M1 Principal Industrial Access: Route 11/460 Water: O!! efts Sewer: O!! site Availability: Property is available !or sale. Recommendation: Rezone remainder o! site Extend sewer service to site. w .n ~./•~i .tL.CCti •~ ~~ ,L~~M h \~bj ~ \ r I o '~a~a m `~ :° s z 4 ~ ray' ~ ~ j i. `mow Q/ A ~ ~\~ 0 rY \ ~ ~y ~J ~ J1 tV r• i N J O dti"Y~~o \ ~\ u ~ ~d ryi ~ ~ f ~a i .1 ~ i \ a Yropp' .y~ .pi wb pJ0 a' ~e N '' ~ ~; ~~.'P r~0``i r ~ . ~ ?~ ;rid~~a~p ~ f tb , t' NN ~+ r~ ^ Y ~~ ~~~ ~1i0 0 ~ ~~ ~ ~ cr ~ ~ IIII ~~OO rU N a~ ? \`~ t / r m n ' ~ M r `, O ~` ~•i'tp Ni j i; ~''/f b°i a yjar . ~ ~ / o / u e t • ~ 1 • A // / j ' } A •O~ • r •~ r :~~ 90 ~. ti, ~~ ; . M r. v S~ , \ _\ ~y s , yr+ 4/ .s,.~Oaoc? ~ , ~~p av°d ff ~i 1.~ ' f t v / ~i~JibV •Ci r ~Y L h f ~ ~Y ~ ~ ~•i'~ deb r t b`1y~1r ~o •. C~ ( ~~'h~ y 1 y V1 0 •y~. V ~~r ~' ~~ t/ b d7 Off' / ~e °~ ~~~~ v • v ~ r y ^ w4 ~ Y ~; V N~ y , ~ A w ~T! ~-r.. • . ~OOVVj OVr O.t~ •h \ ~ ...r ~. ....+~vi ~. ~C' ~ .r yr OV e ~• ~t ~ / , N ~ / i ' f ! ~ 4~ • ~ < ~6~ O ~ $~d F O ~ 'o , , . +, r ~~ .4.s Krt O~d~ ~ w9 ~ ,P 1 i ~ •f~•t' S=p `y e0 r` t, A h ; ts: P d' ti ,O iO tl N ~~ b V ~ J 0 / rp M40' a p~ ~ r O: 0 ~ w r r N ~_ ~ 1 OHO ~ :~i c 1 '• sd'r ~ r ~~ ~d r a o,r s~ 2 I~ S~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~~ A ~l ~t Z ~ ~ v a DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 18 1~° 88 BFSQUICENTENN,P~ A Bcauti~ul Bcginning M E M O R A N D O M TO: Terry Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning FROli: Charlie Saul, Chairman /}~dustrial Development Authority of Roanoke County ~'iG~~~ DATE: August 31, 1990 SIIBJECT: Proffers, Salem-West Corporation Property At this time, the Industrial Development Authority of Roanoke County is still working on a set of acceptable proffers. We hope to present these to your office before the package is presented to the Board of Supervisors. We will be in touch with you and your office as we have questions as to the suitability of our proffers. sbo P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE . VIRGINIA 24018-0798 (703) 772-2069 FAX. NO.: (703) 772-2030 ACTION NUMBER ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEELDNAT THEHROANOKE COUNTYEADMINISTRATION OCENTER COUNTY, VIRGINIA H MEETING DATE: September 25, 1990 SUBJECT: Appointments to Committees, Commissions and Boards COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: 1 Board of Zoninct Appeals Five-year term of M. E. Maxey, Vinton Magisterial District expired June 30, 1990. 2 Building Code Board of Adjustments and Appeals Four-year term of Albert Trompeter will expire October 24, 1990. 3. Grievance Panel Two-year terms of Thomas T. Palmer and R. Vincent Reynolds, Alternate expired September 10, 1990. SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: ~~~~- ~~~- ~ Mary H. Allen Elmer C. Hodge Clerk to the Board County Administrator -------------------------- VOTE ACTION No yes Abs Approved ( ) Motion by: Eddy Denied ( ) Johnson Received ( ) McGraw Referred ( ) Nickens To ( ) Robers ~...:- ,,,, - AT A REG INI M HELD AT THE ROANO OCOUNTY ADMINISTRATIONOCENTER COUNTY, VIR ~ ON TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 25, 1990 RESOLUTION 92590-8 APPRgVING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM J - CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for September 25, 1990 designated as Item J - Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 5, inclusive, as follows: 1. Approval of Minutes - August 28, 1990. 2. Confirmation of Committee Appointments to the Industrial Development Authority and League of Older Americans. 3. Approval of Resolution of Appreciation to George Nester for service to Roanoke County as Vinton Town Manager. 4. Approval of 50/50 Raffle Permit - Loyal Order of the Moose Lodge No. 284. 5. Approval of Raffle Permit - Mason's Cove Elementary School PTA. 2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this resolution. On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt resolution with addition of Item 5, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: ~~ Brenda J. Hol on, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Bingo/Raffle File r ' ,.~"-1 60 9 August 28, 1990 Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Roanoke County Administration Center 3738 Brambleton Avenue, SW Roanoke, Virginia 24018 August 28, 1990 The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, met this day at the Roanoke County Administration Center, this being the fourth Tuesday, and the second regularly scheduled meeting of the month of August, 1990. IN RE: CALL TO ORDER Chairman Robers called the meeting to order at 3:04 p.m. The roll call was taken. MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Richard Robers, Vice Chairman Steven A. McGraw, Supervisors Lee B. Eddy, Bob L. Johnson, Harry C. Nickens MEMBERS AE~F.NT: None STAFF PRESENT: Elmer C. Hodge,• County Administrator; John R. Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator of Community Services and Development; Don M. Myers, Assistant County Administrator for Management Services; Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney, Mary H. Allen, Clerk to the Board; Anne Marie Green, Information Officer August 28, 1990 6 Supervisor Eddy moved to adopt the prepared resolution. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None RESOLOTION 82890-1 OF APPRECIATION TO LOCAL MILITARY PERSONNEL DEFENDING OIIR COIIN~'RY IN THE MIDDLE EAST WHEREAS, many residents of the Roanoke Valley are currently serving in the armed forces, or are members of reserve units of the armed forces or the National Guard; and WHEREAS, due to the current situation in the Middle East, many of these men and women are being sent to that part of the world, or put on alert that they may be called to action; and WHEREAS, the contributions of these citizens will be for the safety, health and well-being of all Americans. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors does hereby extend its deep appreciation and commendation to these men and women as they travel overseas on behalf of the United States; and FIIRTHER, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors does especially appreciate and commend those County employees who have already been or may soon be called to action; and FIIRTHER, BE ZT RESOLVED, that copies of this August 28, 1990 61 3 i Director of Vocational and Adult Education Garland Kidd presented the staff report. He explained that this was a regional program with other localities. The grant is from Cooper Industries for $10,000 and will be used to recruit applicants and expand the curriculum. Supervisor Johnson moved to appropriate the funds. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None 3. Claim of Clark and Emilie Owen A-82890-4 William Maxwell, attorney for the Owens presented the request for the claim which concerns a 50-foot roadway across land owned by Walter L. and Virginia B. Henry which allowed them access to their residence. The Owens feel that as a result of grading, cutting and bulldozing, the road has been destroyed, erosion problems have come about, and that work was performed on their land without their consent. Their claim is for $10,000. Mr. Mahoney recommended that the claim be denied so that the claim may be placed before the Circuit Court. Supervisor Nickens advised that the erosion problems described by Mr. Maxwell should be addressed by the staff. Supervisor Nickens moved to deny the claim and directed staff to evaluate the erosion problems. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: August 28, 1990 6 1 5 ' the Board, the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission authorized the filing and execution of certain documents on behalf of the Com- mission for Airport Improvement Grant #3-51-0045-10 with the Federal Aviation Administration. The Commission has submitted a request that the County approve a capital expenditure in the amount of $1,030,000 by the Commission for acquisition of ap- proximately 8.125 acres of land for airport expansion and develo- pment. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1) That the County hereby approves the capital expen- diture by the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission of approximate- ly $1,030,000 in connection with the Commission acquisition of approximately 8.125 acres of land for airport expansion and development. 2) That the County concurs in the acceptance and execution of a grant agreement with the United States of America, Grant ,~3-51-0045-10, in the approximate amount of $927,000 for the acquisition of said real estate, and the appropriation of local matching funds of up to $103,000 from retaining earnings of the Commission for this acquisition.' 3) That this approval is subject to the receipt of the aforesaid airport improvement grant and to the allocation of the local matching funds from retained earnings of the Commission. 4) That the County Administrator is authorized to August 28, 1990 6 ~ 7 FIRE MARSHALL FOR ROANORE COUNTY AND AUTHORIZING EXERCISE OF POWERS ONDER CHAPTER 3 OF TITLE 27 OF THE CODE OF VIRGINIA AND THE ROANORE COUNTY CODE WHEREAS, Chapter 3 of Title 27 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as emended, provides statutory authority to the governing bodies of counties, cities and towns to appoint a fire marshall and provides for the duties and powers of such official; and WHEREAS, the Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code, previously enacted as Chapter 9 of the Roanoke County Code by Ordinance 52488-13, sets forth the duties and powers of the Roanoke County Fire Marshall in enforcing these codes; and WHEREAS, it is the intent of this resolution to confer upon the Chief of the Fire and Rescue Department of Roanoke County the authority as fire marshall and to designate officers of that department to exercise the duties and powers of the position at his direction. NOW, THEREFORE BE ZT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia as follows: 1. The Chief of the Fire and Rescue Department is hereby appointed as Roanoke County Fire Marshall which position and title shall include the term "fire official" or "arson investigator". The Fire Marshall shall be responsible for exercising all duties and powers of that position or that of the Fire Official granted or implied under Virginia law, including the Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code. 2. The Chief of the Fire and Rescue Department is August 28, 1990 61Q ~. That this resolution shall be in force from the date of its passage. On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None IN RE: REQOESTS FOR POBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING FOR REZONING ORDINANCE - CONSENT AGENDA Supervisor Johnson moved to approve first reading and set the public hearings for September 25, 1990. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None 1. AII ordinance rezoning 7.35 acres from RE Residential to M-2 Manufacturing to construct a contractor office and equipment storage located oa Catawba Valley Drive in the Catawba Magisterial District upon the request of Lacy G. Alexander. 2. An ordinance approving a IIse Not Provided For permit for construction of a 50 to 60 foot microwave tower to be located at the back entrance of Dominion Bankshares Bankcard operations Center at 5673 Airport Road located in the Hollins Magisterial District upon the request of Dominion Bankshares Corporation. IN RE: SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance authorizing Deed of Exchange and Partial 621 August 28, 1990 equipment, which easement is at the same location as a part of the access easement conveyed to Roanoke County by MRI Tanglewood by the above-described deed dated April 15, 1987; and WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Department of Utilities has agreed to a relocation of the portion of its access easement which interferes with the easement being granted by MRI Tanglewood to C&P Telephone as described above; and ~THEREAS, following recordation of the above-described deed dated April 15, 1987, it was discovered that errors had been made in the plat of subdivision by reference to which the conveyances in that deed had been made, with the result that the intentions of the parties were not carried out by the April 15, 1987, deed, and the parties thereto now wish to correct those errors by reconveyance to MRI Tanglewood of the erroneously conveyed property and conveyance to Roanoke County of the correct property; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Charter of Roanoke County, first and second readings are required to pass all ordinances; and WHEREAS, a first reading of the proposed ordinance was held on August 14, 1990; the second reading was held on August 28, 1990. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia as follows: 1. That the release of the 0.041-acre parcel and the appurtenant easements to MRI Tanglewood as described in the deed August 28, 1990 _--- a~tty~,-t~orney~au7 Mahoney should be referred to Mr. Mahoney. Supervisor Nickens stated he felt that any policy statements should be approved by the Board and asked Mr. Mahoney to bring back a report and request for a policy statement at the September 12, 1990 meeting. (4) Expressed continued concern about the late filing fee for personal property tax. Appealed to the Board to discuss the issue again. (5) Also expressed concern about the SDN Market Research Report. He suggested asking the Roanoke Valley Business Council to reconsider the conclusions of the report. Following discussion, it was Board consensus that the County Administrator and staff should go forward with analyzing the report and should bring the results back to the Board. (6) Expressed support for mailing a brochure on consolidation to all voters prior to the referendum. SUPERVISOR MCGRAW: (1) Asked the County Administrator when the report on the SDN Market Research would be available. Mr. Hodge responded he would try to have the result complete by September 12, 1990. (2) Asked for a report on the costs to mail a brochure to citizens regarding consolidation. SUPERVISOR ROWERS: (1) Announced that the Airport Commission will hold a retreat on September 5 and 6 and welcomed comments and suggestions from the public regarding the airport. Several board members expressed support for changing the membership of the commission to include citizens. (2) Announced August 28, 1990 6 AGENDA FOR TH.IB DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM L- CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. that the certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for August 28, 1990 designated as Item L - Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 5, inclusive, as follows: 1. Approval of Raffle Permit - Botetourt Jaycees 2. Confirmation of Committee Appointments to the Community Corrections Resources Board and the Industrial Development Authority. 3. Resolution requesting acceptance .of Kings Chase Drive, Fox Croft Circle and Huntmaster Circle into the VDOT Secondary System. 4. Acceptance of water and sanitary sewer facilities serving Kings Chase - Section 1. 5. Donation of a drainage easement, Lot 73, Section 1, Kings Chase. 6. Approval of Raffle Permit - Northside Athletic Booster Club 2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this resoJ.v.tion. On motion of Supervisor Johnson with the addition of Item 6, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None August 28, 1990 6 ~ 7 3. That said roads known as Kings Chase Drive, Fox Croft Circle and Huntmaster Circle which are shown on a certain sketch accompanying this Resolution, be, and the same are hereby established as public roads to become a part of the State Secondary System of Highways in Roanoke County, only from and after notification of official acceptance of said streets by the Virginia Department of Transportation. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None IN RE: CITIZENS COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS 1. Robert Myers, 6533 Laban Road spoke concerning Roanoke County's involvement with the conference center. He asked that any construction contracts be awarded by an open competitive bid process and presented a suggested list that bidders should comply with. • 2. Patrick Cosmato, 5219 Burnt Quarter, Vinton suggested that if Roanoke County participates in the Hotel Roanoke/Conference Center project they should demand fair representation on a commission and a fair revenue return to the County. August 28, 1990 6 of holding a public hearing on this issue. He supported the concept of the Hotel Roanoke/Conference Center project but was concerned about the County participation. IN RE: REPORTS Supervisor Johnson moved to receive and file the following reports. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None 1. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance 2. General Fund Unappropriated Balance 3. Board Contingency Fund 4. Accounts Paid - July 1990 IN RE: AORR SESSION 1. State Budget Shortfall County Administrator Elmer Hodge presented the report. He advised that the staff does not yet know the full impact of the Governor's reductions. The unaudited addition to the fund balance is $2.8 million which will take the fund balance to 8.6$. He presented a list of expenses that he recommended be set aside from the fund balance as follows:. (1) Economic Development, August 28, 1990 s3 ~ on the budget shortfall to after the evening session. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote. IN RE: EXECOTIVE SESSION At 5:20 p.m., Supervisor Nickens moved to go into Executive Session pursuant to the Code of Virginia Section 2.1- 344 (a) (5) to discuss a prospective business or industry where no previous announcement of the business has been made. The motion carried by the following voice vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None IN RE: CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE SESSION R-82890-9 At 5:35 p.m., Supervisor Nickens moved to return to open session and adopt the Certification Resolution. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisors McGraw, Johnson RESOLUTION 82890-9 CERTIFYING EXECUTIVE MEETING WAS HELD IN CONFORMITY WITH THE CODE OF VIRGINIA WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia has convened an executive meeting on this date pursuant- to an affirmative recorded vote and in accordance with the provisions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and August 2s, 1990 6 3 3 Magisterial District. Director of Development and Inspections Arnold Covey presented the staff report. There was no discussion and no one was present to speak. Supervisor Robers moved to approve first reading of the ordinance. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None 890-2 ordinance requesting vacation of a 20 foot drainage easement shown on the resubdivision of Tract 3, Southwest Industrial Park, located in the Cave Spring Magisterial District. Mr. Covey presented the staff report. There was no discussion and no citizens spoke on the ordinance. Supervisor Nickens moved to approve first reading of the ordinance. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None IN RE: POBLIC HEARINGS AND SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 890-3 An Ordinance requesting vacation of a 50 foot right-of -way referred to as "Goff Road" recorded in Plat Book 3, Page 59 and located in the Catawba Magisterial District. 0-82890-10 August 28, 1990 6 3 5 WHEREAS, a first reading of the proposed ordinance was held on August 14, 1990; the second reading was held on August 28, 1990. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That a 50 foot right-of way approximately 197 feet in length extending from Webster Drive in a southwesterly direction and designated as an extension of Goff Road, as recorded in Plat Book 3, page 59, located in the Catawba Magisterial District, is hereby vacated. 2. That the County Administrator is authorized to execute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County as are necessary to accomplish the vacation of the said right-of-way, all of which shall be upon form approved by the County Attorney. 3. That a certified copy of this ordinance of vacation shall be recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia after the time for appeal of the adoption of this ordinance has expired, or in the event of any such appeal, upon the denial of such appeal, as provided by § 15.1-482, Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended. 4. The effective date of this ordinance shall be August 28, 1990. un motion of Supervisor McGraw to approve ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers August 28, 1990 6 3 WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on August 14, 1990, and the second reading and public hearing was held August 28, 1990; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on August 7, 1990; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: . 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing 1.78 acre, as described herein, and located on the west side of Starkey Road north of its intersection with Buck Mountain Road, (Tax Map Numbers 87.18-1- 38 and 87.18-1-41) in the Cave Spring Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of R-1, Single Family Residential District, to the zoning classification of B- 1, Office District. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of Thomas Scarce. 3. That the owner has voluntarily proffered in writing the following conditions which the Board of Supervisors hereby accepts: 1) The footprint of the house will not be expanded. 2) The location of the parking area required for the office zoning will be in substantial conformity with the site plan prepared by Dickson Architects, dated May 30, 1990. 63 9 August 28, 1990 & Surveyors, Ltd., dated March 17, 1986. 5. That the effective date of this ordinance shall be _August 28, 1990. ^n motion of Supervisor Robers to approve ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None 890-5 An ordinance modifying the proffered conditions on a 24.94 acre tract to increase the size (number of bedrooms) of a portion of the 264 apartment units previously approved; located on the west side of Colonial Avenue, near the intersection of Ogden Road in the Cave Spring Magisterial District, upon the request of Occidental Development Ltd. 0-82890-12 Mr. Harrington presented the staff report. He advised that the original rezoning was approved in September 1988. This request will amend the proffers to change the range of apartment sizes. The total number of apartments will remain at 264, but the number of two bedrooms will increase from 119 to 132, three bedrooms will increase from 0 to 36 and 1 bedroom will decrease from 146 to 96. Staff studied the traffic and based on trip generation, the requested change will have no greater impact on traffic than the rezoning request already approved. School attendance would increase from 17 to 52. Green Valley Elementary School advised the staff that mobile classrooms were being used at this time and if the students were between kindergarten and fifth grade, this 641 August 28, 1990 The following citizens spoke in opposition to the amendment of the conditions. 1 Willis P. Lanier, 4743 Woodley Drive, S.W. who was opposed because of the potential for more children regardless of how the project is marketed and because of the impact to the schools of the additional children. 2. Mark Siler. 3471 Olde Town Road _S. W. was opposed because the project was originally approved for one and two bedrooms with less impact on the community. Green Valley School is already overcrowded and doesn't need additional students. He also asked if there were provisions for playgrounds and other entertainment for children when they are aware there will be additional children. 3. Doug Doughty. 3534 Wedgewood, was opposed because of lowered property values and the possibility of cheap construction. 4. David Courey, 3419 Ashmeade, pointed out that the apartments were originally approved because they would only have one and two bedroom apartments for empty nesters and wouldn't be contributing to the overcrowded conditions at Green Valley School. Now, they have changed their mind and will not be able to discourage families with children in three bedroom apartments. He also questioned why it hasp taken so long to begin construction. Representatives from Occidental advised that the apartment have not yet been built because Occidental has been 643 August 28, 1990 District with proffered conditions, in September of 1988. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: Denied on motion of Supervisor Robers, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None 890-6 An ordinance modifying an existing Planned IInit Development plan on a 2 acre tract generally located within the Stonehenge PIID, south of Relly Lane in the Cave Spring Magisterial District. This request is to permit the construction of a 16 unit, single building condominium, upon the request of J. Allison Associates. This rezoning request was continued to September 25, 1990 at the request of the petitioner. 890-7 An ordinance modifying the proffered conditions on approximately .25 acres to allow the use of the property for a take-out restaurant and. food service, with the existing office. and video store, located at 5314 Fallowater Drive in the Cave Spring Magisterial District, upon the request of John Lee Davenport. 0-82890-13 Mr. Harrington reported that the Comprehensive Development Plan placed this area in a Core land use category with retail uses encouraged. The only significant impact factor was access to the site which does not have good visibility or August 28, 1990 6 ~ '~ held August 28, 1990; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on August 7, 1990; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law; and WHEREAS, this property was rezoned from B-1, Office District, to B-2, General Commercial District with proffered conditions, on February 26, 1986. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing approximately .25 acre, as described herein, and located at 5314 Fallowater Lane, in the Cave Spring Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of B-2, Conditional with proffered conditions, to the zoning classification of B-2, Conditional with amended proffered conditions. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of John Lee Davenport. 3. That the applicant has voluntarily proffered in writing the following amendments to the conditions approved by the Board of Supervisors on February 26, 1986, which the Board of Supervisors hereby accepts: 1) The property will be used for a take-out restaurant and food service, along with the existing office and video store. 2) An entrance and~exit will be provided at all August 28, 1990 6 4 7 Mr. Harrington presented the staff report. The only significant impact fact was that the site layout was constrained by existing conditions which will reduce the expansion of the tire service. The Planning Commission recommended approval. Mr. Wright was present to answer questions. Supervisor Eddy asked how the petitioner was going to store and dispose of the old tires. Mr. Wright responded there was a trailer on the site to store the tires and the trailer was periodically hauled away. Supervisor Robers moved to approve the request. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None ORDINANCE 82890-14 TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A 0.28 ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED NEAR THE SOIITHERN INTERSECTION OF SR 904 (STARREY ROAD) AND SR 632 (CRESCENT BLVD.) (TAB MAP NO. 87.18-1-45) IN THE CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF B-2 TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF M-1 AITH CONDITIONS OPON THE APPLICATION OF NORMAN T. WRIGHT WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on August 14, 1990, and the second reading and public hearing was held August 28, 1990; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on August 7, 1990; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke August 28, 1990 64 g feet to an iron pin; thence with the line of the .033 acre tract previously conveyed to the Grantee and others , S . 11 deg . 3 0' E . 14 6.91 f eet to the place of beginning. 5. That the effective date of this ordinance shall be August 28, 1990. On motion of Supervisor Robers to approve ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None IN RE: CITIZENS COMMENTS AND COMMIINICATIONS 1. Richard Cox, 5714 Capito Street, President of the North Roanoke Recreation Club spoke in opposition to the user fees for parks and recreation. He requested: (1) reconsideration of the fee, and (2) if the user fee remains, the County should inform the public and set up a method of collection. 2. Mike Aalthall, 5118• Wi~ledale Avenue, spoke in opposition to the parks and recreation user fees. Supervisor McGraw moved to reconsider action taken on August 14, 1990 adopting-the ordinance establishing user fees for the Parks and Recreation Department. Supervisor Robers pointed out that the Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission support the imposition of user fees and recommended closer communication between the youth and adult sports and the members of the Parks and Recreation Advisory 651 August 28, 1990 NAYS: None 3. Charles Lavinder, 5448 Cannon Road, spoke in opposition to funding and participation by Roanoke County in the Hotel Roanoke\Conference Center project and recommended a public hearing on the matter. IN RE: RECESS: Chairman Robers declared a recess at 9:05 p.m. IN RE: RECONVENEMENT Chairman Robers reconvened the meeting at 9:15 p.m. IN RE: AORR SESSION ON STATE BIIDGET SHORTFALL (CONTINIIED FROM AFTERNOON SESSION) Mr. Hodge reminded the Board that new sources of tax revenue are already committed to Roanoke Metropolitan Government and are not available to the County unless the consolidation referendum does not pass. Mr. Hodge included two major possible funding projects that the Board should consider for future years: (1) the Hotel Roanoke/Conference Center and (2) the Explore Project. He asked for direction from the Board on these projects. Supervisor McGraw stated he did not want to go forward with the Conference Center until the details of the budget shortfall and the results of the consolidation referendum are known. Supervisor Johnson expressed support for the project August 28, 1990 6 5 3 before any decision is made. Supervisor Robers felt that any county funds should be used only for capital expenses. Mr. Hodge advised that he will schedule a presentation on the Explore Project for September 25, 1990 at 3:00 p.m. IN RE: ADJOURNMENT Supervisor Johnson moved to adjourn at 10:00 p.m. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None Richard W. Robers, Chairman i ACTION NO. A-925'9'''0~8 . a ITEM NUMBER `-~` °" AT A RE GILAR HELDIAT THE ROANOKE~DCOUNTY ADMINISTRAT ONRCENTER COUNTY, VIR MEETING DATE' September 25, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: Confirmation of Committee Appointments to the Industrial Development Authority and League of Older Americans COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The foll d nshouldlbetconfirmed by the Boarde ofeSuperveisors, 1990 meeting a Industrial Development Authority Supervisor Eddy nominated Ronald M. Martin to the Industrial Development Authority, for a four-year term, which will expire September 26, 1994. Leaaue of Older Americans Supervisor Eddy nominated Frances Holsinger to serve on the League of Older Americans to complete the unexpired term of Murry K. White. This term will expire on March 31, 1991. RECOMMENDATION' It is recommended that the above nominations be confirmed. Respectfully submitted, Approved by, ~~ ~ ~ ~~~~$ ~ Elmer C . Hodge Mary H. Allen Clerk to the Board County Administrator -------------------------ACTION--------- VOTE Approved (x) Motion by: Harry C. Nickens No Yes Abs x Denied ( ) Johnson x Received ( ) McGraw x Referred ( ) Nickens x To ( ) Robers x cc: File Industrial Development Authority File League of Older Americans File -.~ ' ..~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, ON TUESDAYS SEPTEMBER 25TY 1ggpINISTRATION CENTER RESOLUTION 92590-8.b OF APPRECIATION TO G E O R G E NESTER FOR OUTSTANDING SERVICE TO THE CITIZENS OF ROANORE COUNTY AS VINTON TOWN MANAGER WHEREAS, George Nester has served as the Town Manager of Vinton, Virginia, in the County of Roanoke, since September, 1983; and WHEREAS, George Nester has been instrumental in the continued progress of the Town of Vinton through improvements in downtown Vinton, development of the Vinton Industrial Park, expansion of Vinton's public water system, the Vinton Gladetown Community Improvement Project and the widening of Washington Avenue; and WHEREAS, George Nester has been an asset to the citizens of Roanoke County through his efforts in cooperation and negotiations on behalf of the Town of Vinton; and WHEREAS, George Nester has accepted a position as Vice President with Mattern and Craig Consulting Engineers and Surveyors in a new business venture. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County wishes to express its deepest appreciation and the appreciation of the citizens of Roanoke County to GEORGE NESTER for his outstanding service as Vinton Town Manager. FURTHER, the Board of Supervisors does express its best wishes for success in all his future endeavors. On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Brenda J. Holton, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Resolutions of Appreciation File ACTION NO . A- 9 2 5 9'0~- 8. c ITEM NUMBER °' '~ AT A IRGIN A HELDIAT THE TROANOKERDCOUNTY UADMINISTRATIONRC LATER COUNTY, V MEETING DATE: September 25, 1990 AGENDA ITEM• Request for approval of 50/50 Raffle Permit from the Loyal Order of the Moose Lodge No. 284. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Loyal Order of the Moose Lodge No. 284 has requested a 50/50 Raffle Permit for the following dates: September 26, 28, 29 October 3, 5, 6, 10, 12, 13, 17, 19, 20, 24, 26, 27, 31 November 2, 3, 7, 9, 10, 14, 16, 17, 21, 23, 24, 28, 30 December 1, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 15, 19, 21, 22, 26, 28, 29 This application has been reviewed with the Commissioner of Revenue and he recommends that it be approved. The organization has paid the $25.00 fee. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the application for a Raffle Permit be approved. SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: yn ,J~- ~~~~`~ Mary H. Allen Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator Clerk to the Board -------- - ----------- ACTION VOTE - Approved (x) Motion by. Harry C. Nickens No Yes Abs - Denied ( ) Johnson X Received ( ) McGraw x Referred ( ) Nickens x To ( ) Robers x cc: File Bingo/Raffle File COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA COMMISSIONER OF THE REVENUE APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO CONDUCT RAFFLES OR BINGO Application is hereby madubf°ctatolall CountyrandfStateelaws, This application is made s ~ ordinances, rules, and regulations nowagreeacto by the undebe enacted hereafter and which are hereby signed applicant and which shall be deemed a condition under which this permit is issued. All applicants should exercise extreme ra u stionsure Bingo games cy of their responses to the followingTgtle 18.2-340.1 et. se . and raffles are strictly regulated by of the criminal statutes of tCountrgCode.CThesealaws authorize 4-86 et. seg. of the Roanoke, Y the County Board of Supervisors to conduct a reasonable investiga- rantin a bingo or raffle permit. The Board has tion prior to g g lication to grant or deny the sixty days from the filing of an app Prmit of any permit. The Board may deny, suspend, or revoke the p. organization found not to be in strict compliance with county and state law. Any person violating county or state regulations concerti son hwho permits shall be guiltYrossareceipts fromebingoror raffles for any uses any part of the g purpose other than the lawfuo~ whichlthe~organization is specifi~ or educational purposes cally organized, except for reasonable operating expenses, shal be guilty of a Class 6 felony. THIS APPLICATION I FOR: (check one> ~;1~ ~n ~/q~ s RAFFLE PERMIT ~~'Cl BINGO GAMES /" _ ~ ~1~ wa ~. Name of Organization ~~ ~~f ~ Street Address ~~ ~.3~ '~ n ~ ~ Mailing Address ~ • ~~ ~ ~ City, State, Zip Code Purpose and Type of Organization When was the organization founded? / ~!/S~ 1 Roanoke County meeting place? ~oc~se. ~orn~ Has organization been in existence in Roanoke County for two con- tinuous years? YES .%- NO /~ Is the organization non-profit? YES NO Indicate Federal Identification Number # s'S~' U~~7~~"~ Attach copy of IRS Tax Exemption letter. Officers of the Organization: ~~~ ~A/1l~'A~L'~Vice-President ~6~~ President: (L~aa ~ J q~ Address: ~~~1 ~6Y~'>> ~~~ ~`'~ Address: 'r ~iri p9 u/ ~ 4J 1, ~,,hc 2 e. Treasurer : c'. D ~"/~ Secretary: . U • ,~"-fib' Address : ~~~ ~ 1~Ja Dbs Cad SSi~Z ~ Address: sati ~~, vQ ~ ~lS~ Member authorized to be responsible for Raffle or Bingo opera- tions: Name ~~ 1) ~ ~ ~ ~~'7~ ~-~~-i (!~ Z ~- e ~ J~ r,~ 5 ~ $ Home Address Phone_~~`~ ' ~ /•7 bus . Phone_y?~-,~,-~ ~ ~ '3 A COMPLETE LIST OF ED WITHMTHIS APPLDCATIONS OF CURRENT MEMBER- SHIP MUST BE FURNISH Specific location where Raffle or Bingo Game is to be conducted. '~~~~ ,,~s ~~~ Time of Drawing RAFFLES: Date of Drawing BINGO: Days of Week & Hours of Activity: Sunday Monday Tuesday _ Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday From To From To From To From To From To From To From To 2 State specifically how the annedeor intended use~ofRthelproceedse used. List in detail the pl Use estimates amounts if necessary. ~~_ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~, s ~ ~~~.. "°/sue tom: / / Sze.. H ,u ii.a-rro ~.u' ~ .~ve,a,I ~~~~?~- , -~ C •'' ~ C.. ~'.-..~ 3 BINGO: Complete the following: Legal owner(s) of the building where B//INGO is to be conducted: Name: Address : ~ ,~ S3 ~ ~~,~~ _~`' ~~~~~ State 10A Z ip~ ~ County.w~~ _ Is the building owned by a 501-C non-profit organization? ~ s Seating capacity for each location: `7U~' 7v~ Parking spaces for each location: ALL RAFFLE AND BINGO APPLICANTS MUST ANSWER QUESTIONS 1 - 19 1. Gross receipts from all bb calendarlqua r ero forep~ for calenf Bingo games or Instant Bingo y dar year period. INSTANT BINGO BINGO 1st Quarter 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter 1st Quarter 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter Total Total 2. Does your organization understand erson orsfirm,o associaf law to enter into a contract with any p tion, organization, partnership, or corporatign of any cla orfcon- tion whatsoever~mesrorhRaffles?e of organizin , managing, ducting Din~• Ga 3. Does your organization understand that it must maintain ado file complete recordsflesreand th tdsuchbreceordssaorersubject to Bingo games and Raf audit by the Commissioner of the Revenue? 4, Does your organization us d he righttto go uponothes premises the Revenue or his designee ha on which any organizatio~l~s candutolsecurelforgaudit allfre- to perform unannounced au , cords required to be maintained for Bingo games or raffles? 4 5, Does your organizationssionertofdtheaRevenueaonlor before must be filed with the Commi the first day of November of each calendar year for which a per mit has been issued? 6, Does your organi llarsndurangsanydcalendar quartereC a n addi- ceed fifty thousand do tional Financial Report must be filed for such quarter no later than sixty days following the last day of such quarter?_~~ 7, Does your organization hadlrcause automaticfrevocationlof financial reports when due s Bingo game the Pe lel thereafter uuntilgsuch reportais properlynfiled and a or raff new permit is obtained?_~_____-- g, Does your organization understand that each Financial Report must be accompanied by a Certificate, verified under oath by the Board of Directors, that the proceeds of any Bingo game or raffle have been used for these lawful, religious, charitable, commu- nity, or educational purposes for which the organization is spe- cifically chartered ore°beenl ind~accordancetwithpthetp~ovisionsnof games or raffles hav_ Article 1.1 of Chapter 8, Title 18.2 o.f the Code of Virginia? ~' g, Does your organizatiouStnberpaiddtohtheaCountyeof Roanoke fee of the gross receipts m upon submission of the annual financial report due on or before the first of November? 10. Does your organizdanokeuand onlynattsuchtlocapionst andafor only in the County of Ro such dates, as are designated in the permit application? 11. Does your organization understand that no person, except a bona fide member of any such organization who shall haverbOrnto member of such organization for at least ninety days p such participation, shall participate in the management, opera- tion, or conduct of any bingo game or raffle, and no person shall receive any retuofran1O5uch gamer orcraffle g inkmanagement, operation, or conduc Y 12. Has your organizat25n00tpayable toe the Countyaofu Roanoket fee in the amount of $ Virginia? 13 . Does your organizationAind o anddRaf f le Ordinancea o ~ ~18u2a in violation of the County g 340.10 of the Code of Virginia authorizing this permit is subject to having such permit revoked and any person, shareholder, agent, member or employee of such organizatierson~ sha reholder a agen t having such permit revoked and any p member or employee of such organization who violates the above referenced Codes may be guilty of a felony? 5 14. Has your organization attached a complete ship to this application form? r~ ~ ~~~~- list of its member- of its bylaws to this l5, Has your organization, attached a application form? li/~- 16. Has the organization been declared tion under the Virginia Con~iotu is nfor If yes, state whether exemp or both and identify exempt property.- copy exempt from property taxa- statutes?~ erty, real, pers nal prop ,¢ FJ ~ /~ 17. State the specific type anf~ purpose o~ the organization. ~' eY ,v A. - v •v lg. Is this organization incorporated in Virginia? 2S If yes, n me a d address of Registered Agent: 0 lg. Is the organization erg Affairs pursuantVtogtheaCharitable of Agriculture and Consum Solicitations Act, Sectionistration.~he Virginia Code? ~ (If so, attach copy of reg Has the organization been granted ulturemand Consumerg Affairs? by the Virginia Department of Agric N G (If so, attach copy of exemption.) ALL RAFFLE APPLICANTS DESCRIBE VALUE OF SUCH ARTICLES, AND PROCEED Article Description ~~~ THE ARTICLES TO BE RAFFLED, TO NOTARIZATION. 6 Fair Market Value ALL BINGO APPLICANTS MUST ANSWER QUESTIONS 20 - 27 BEFORE NOTARIZATION RAFFLE APPLICANTS, GO TO NOTARIZATION. 20. Does your organizateouent ersthand twot cahlendarod ys sinhany not be conducted more f r q Y calendar week? 21. Does your organization understand that it is required to keep complete records of the irngniaamandT§4S98r of RoanokedCountyl Code 340.6 of the Code of V g must include the following: a. A record of the date, quantity, and card value of instant bingo supplies purchased, as well as the naliesndanddwritten the supplier of such instant bingo supp invoice or receipt is also required for each purchase of in- stant bingo supplies? b, A record in writing ointattendancenonheach8 date sand Ythe the number of people amou etrecordscmustt be retained foroth.ree years? ) (Thes c. A record of ah ulareornspec~ialsBingoagame priaeaort jackpot door prize, r-g from the playing of Bingo is awarded? d. A complete and itemized record of all receipts and disburse- ments which support, and that agree with, the quarterly and annual reports required to be filed, and that these records must be maintained in reasonable order to permit audit? 22. Does your organization understand that instant Bingo ma ressy be conducted such locations and at suchnt mes as arelspec f ed in and only a this application? 23. Does your organization understand that the gross receipts in the course of a reporting year from the playing of instant Bingo may not exceed 33 1/3$ of the gross receipts of an organization's Bingo operation? 24. Does your organization understand it may not sell an instant Bingo card to an individual below sixteen years of age? 25. Does your organization understand that an organization whose gross receipts from all bingo operations that exceed or are ex- pected to exceed $S at~s0 ursuant tolSection 501 ChoflthevUnited granted tax exempt p States Internal Revenue Service? (Certificate must be attached.) 7 26. Does your organization understand that a Certificate of Occu- pancy must be obtained or be on file which authorizes this use at the proposed location? 27. Does your organization understand that awards or prize money or merchandise valued in excess of the following amounts are illegal? a, No door prize shall exceed twenty-five dollars. b, No regular Bingo or special Bingo game shall exceed One Hund- red dollars. c, No jackpot of any nheutotalaamountrofhjackpotepri~ es awarded Dollars, nor shalt t in any one calendar day exceed One Thousand Dollars. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * NOTARIZATION: THE FOLLOWING OATH MUST BE TAKEN BY ALL APPLICANTS I hereby swear or affirm under the penalties of perjury as set forth in §18. 2 of t to theebest of mynknowledge,a information band statements are... true beliefs. A1:1`guestions have been answered. Signet': ~ ~~ Title xome ress 19 Subscribed and sworn before me, this day of My commission expires: 19 Notary Public RETURN THIS COMPLETED APPLICATION T0: COMMISSIONER OF THE REVENUE P.O. Box 20409 Roanoke, VA 24018-0513 8 NOT VALID UNLESS COUNTERSIGNED The above application, having been found in due form, is approved and issued to the applicant to have effect until December 31st of this calendar year. Date Commissioner of 'le Reve The above application is not approved. Date Commissioner of the Revenue 9 Mailing Address: PO. Box 538, Salem, Va. 24153 September 18, 1990 T0: Ms. Gerri K. Rorer County o Ron k~h~ ~(,~,,~ ~ FROM: r'aul itt re Administrator Roanoke Moose ~k284 SUBJECT: Dates for 50/50 Raffle September; 26, 28, 29 October: 03, 05, 06, 10, 12, 13, 17, 19, 20, 24, 26, 27, 31 November: 02, 03, 07, 09, 10, 14, 16, 17, 21, 23, 24, 28, 30 December: Ol, O5, 07, 08, 12, 14, 15, 19, 21, 22, 26, 28, 29 PJW/gcf Phone: 384-7172 Lodge Located From I-81, Exit 41 On SR 311, North ROANOKE LODGE No. 284 LOYAL ORDER OF MOOSE 1 ACTION NO. p,-92590-8.d ITEM NUMBER ~~~ cc: AT A REGULAR MEETING OF T OANOKERD OUNTY ADMINI TRATIONROENTER COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE R MEETING DATE: September 25, 1990 AGENDA ITEM• Request for approval of a Raffle Permit from Mason's Cove Elementary School PTA COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: School PTA has requested a Raffle The Mason's Cove Elementary on October 20, Permit for a raffle to be held in Roanoke County 1990. This application has been ~ be ea ed o d.the Commissioner of Revenue and he recommends that i PP The organization has paid the $25.00 fee. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the application for a Raffle Permit be approved. APPROVED BY: SUBMITTED BY: ~~ Mary H. Allen Elmer C. Hodge Clerk to the Board County Administrator ------------- ------------------ -------------- VOTE _ ACTION No Yes Abs Motion by: Harry C' T~'r'kPnG Approved (x) Eddy ~- Denied ( ) Johnson x Received ( ) McGraw x Referred ( ) Nickens x To ( ) Robers x - File Bingo/ Raffle File COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA COMMISSIONER OF THE REVENUE N FOR PERMIT TO CONDUCT RAFFLES OR BINGO A??LICr,TI• ame or raffle permit. made for a bingo g and State laws, Application is hereby Pct to all County or that may be This application is made su ulations now in force, the under- ordinances, rules, and reg a reed to by enacted hereafter and which a.re hereby g nt and which shall be deemed a condition under signed appllca which this permit is issued. Bingo games icants should exercise extreln c goes ~ onsure the accu se All apPl onses to the follow g cy of their resp ulated by Title 18.2-340.1 et. inia Code, and by Section and raffles are strictly reg These laws authorize of the criminal statutes of the VirgCode. 4-86 et. se of the Roanoke,County The Board has -"' Board of Supervisors to cond~fleapermitnable investiga- the County ranting a bingo or ra rant or deny the tion prior to g of an application to g Prmit of any sixty days from the filing suspend, or revoke the p- The Board may deny, liance with county and permit. organization found not to be in strict com state law. these county or state regulations concerning of a Class 1 misdemeanor. Any person who Any person violating permits shall be guilty is from bingo or raffles for any. art of the gross receip charitable, community, uses any p ions, ur oses for which the organization is specifi- purpose other Than tphe lawful relig expenses, shall or educationa p t for reasonable operating cally organized, excep be guilty of a Class 6 felony. THIS APPLICATION IS FOR: RAFFLE PERMIT ~- (check one) BINGO GAMES Name of Organization v Street Address it ,. __,- A~ A-a.rs~~ Mailing Address City, State, lip Code 5~ °~ Soh e of Organization o ` Purpose and Typ ~ ~~ co~ ~a- ~ c~c.~ off" ~t~,:~ (~P~` t When was the organization founded? ~~ ~ S ~~ r Roanoke County meeting place? ^^ `~ ^'"`S ~-0~~ ~ ~~~ Has organization been in exist0ence in Roanoke County for two con- N tinuous years? YES___~___. Is the organization non-profit? YES 11~ ~1 13B Indicate Federal Identification Number # ~ y Attach copy of IRS Tax Exemption letter. Officers of the Organization: Vice-President i ~hln~- SC~QV~65 President: r ~~ Address: ~a~~ ~ ~~~~5 C.pJ~ Address : ''~$$ i ~2.A ~ ~ ~ r n ~ nn ~,/ ~} a i-E. l `ice cn.r-~~ .1ra ~~153 - i1~Q-n~ ~y~. w - ~~ Treasurer: Secretary:_ ~ Address: ~a3~ ~~~~~~~ ~ ` .~ Address: S '~. ~ Member authorized to be resoonsible for Raffle or Bingo opera- tions: Name ~ Home Address ~$ 1 ~~OSkF , Phone ~~`~E L~~_~-Bus' phone A COMPLETE LIST OF THE NAMEHIS APPLDCATIONS OF CURRENT MEMBER- SHIP MUST BE FURNISHED WITH T Specific location where Raffle or Bingo Game is to be conducted. MA'S G~''<5 ~'`'~ ~~{r . S cam' c,L. V f~ ay X53 3 3 `1~ a ~ ~ 5 ~ r~ ~ ~ ~ 5 ~--c~--~`r`~ M. Time of Drawing ' RAFFLES: Date of Drawing CiC'~ ~° ;~~~ BINGO: Days of Week & Hours of Activity: Sunday From To To Monday From To --Tuesday F r om____ __ To Wednesday From To Thursday From Friday From To To Saturday From_ _, 2 State specifically how the- proceeds intended usegofRthelproceedse used. List in detail the planned or Use estimates amounts if necessary. 4~`I ..~~ ~ ~- S g'~ ~ ~ ~ ~ oc~. 5 ~-° r "-~ e- S c~~~ ~ G ~~ ~ C~ `~ 2-+r ~I es~r~ ~ ~- 7e O ^~"c~,`' -~-'~-5 I 0 ~, J~,,~~/yes ~ ~~~~~--~,~/ 3 BINGO: Complete the following: al owner(s) of the building where BINGO is to be conducted: Leg Name: Address: State Zip~_. County Is the building owned by a 501-C non-profit organization?___ Seating capacity for each location: Parking spaces for each location: LL RAFFLE AND BINGO APPLICANTS MUST ANSWER QUESTIONS 1 - 19 A Gross receipts from all sources r~laua d e °foreprior calenf 1• calenda q Bingo games or Instant Bingo by dar year period. INSTANT BINGO BINGO 1st Quarter 1st Quarter 2nd Quarter 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter 4th Quarter Total ~~N~ Total ~ Does your organization understand erson orsfirm,oaassociaf 2. law to enter into a contract witch corporation of any classifica- tion, organization, partnership, managing, or con- tion whatsoever, for the purpose of organizing, ducting Bingo Games or Raffles? ~`~~i5 3. Does your organization understand that it must maintain ado file complete records of rece d thatdsuchb recordssa~er subject to Bingo games and Raffles, an audit by the Commissioner of the Revenue? '!r S 4, Does your organization usd he Tagil that the Commissioner o i ht to go upon the premises the Revenue or his designee ha a Bin o ame or raffle, on which any organization is candutolsecure forgaudit all re- to perform unannounced audits, ames or raffles? cords required to be maintained for Bingo g y ~5 4 5, Does your organization under~tofdtheaRevenueaonlor before must be filed with the Commissions the first day of November of each calendar year for which a per mit has been issuQd? y ~5 6, Does your organization undnrsanndcalendar quartereCan addi- ceed fifty thousand dollars dur g Y tional Financial Report must be fi-led for such quarter n Clater than sixty days following the .last day of such quarter? ?, Does your organization undercause automaticfrevoc t onlof financial reports when due shall Bingo game the permit, and n er uunti lg such treporta is properlyn f i led and a or raffle thereaft new permit is obtained? `1~ ~ g, Does your organization undea~eanderifi d cunderaoath by pthe must be accompanied by a Certific ~ Bin o ame or raffle Board of Directors, that the proceeds of any g g have been used for these lawful, religious, charitable, commu- nity, or educational purposes for which the organization is spe- cifically chartered or organized, and that the operatio°nv °s onsn of games or raffles ht vre gbeTitle 18 2 o athe Code ofeVprginia?~,~ Article 1.1 of Chap 9, Does your organization understaadtohtheaCountyeof Roanoke fee of the gross receipts must be Pa upon submission of the annual financial report due on or before the first of November? ~~S 10. Does your organization under n~,anattsuchtlocationst andafoa only in the County of Roanoke and o y such dates, as are designated in the permit application? 11. Does your organization understand that no person, except a bona fide member of any such organization who shall haverbo~nto member of such organization for at least ninety days P era- erson such participation, sfa an pabingo°gamelortraffleagandnno p tion, or conduct o Y in management, shall receive any remuneration for participating operation, or conduct of any such game or raffle? ~1F 12. Has your organization attac able toe t e Countyaof Roanoket fee in the amount of $25.00 p Y Virginia? ~~~ 13. Does your organization understnadRaf.fle Ordinanceao ~ §18u2a in violation of the County Bingo a 340.10 of the Code of Virginia authorizing this permit is subject erson, shareholder, agent, to having such permit revoked and any p member or employee of such orga anatierson~ shareholder a agen t having such permit revoked and Y p member or employee of such orogf ~ Fetlooy~who~~s lates the above referenced Codes may be guilty 5 r i 14. Has your ship to this list of its member- our organization attached a copy of its bylaws to this 15. Has y application form? ~iG%S - roperty taxa- 16. Has the orga~liniaoConstitutionroa statptes?oIJoN~ ©~?~-~ tion under the Vi g ersonal property, If yes, state whether exemption is for real, p or both and identify exempt property. ~., ~ . 17. State the specific type and purpose of the organization. a ~ w lg. Is this organization incorporated in en~ginia? y GS - If yes, name and address of Registered Ag .the organization registered with the Vtogthea Charitable 19. Is of Agriculture and Consumer Affairs pursuan Solicitations Act, Section 57-4gion.)he Virginia Code? !J D (If so, attach copy of registrat o Has the organization been granted ulturem and Consumerg Affairs? by the Virginia Department of A of exemption.) ~~_ (If so, attach copy ALL RAFFLE APPLICANTS DESCRIBE VALUE OF SUCH ARTICLES, AND PROCEED Article Description ;.) ~ ~ e_q 5-~ o~r~ ~~ i ~-e-~n 5 J ~~~ organization attached a complete application form? ~~ ~~~~ - THE ARTICLES TO BE RAFFLED, TO NOTARIZATION. Fair Market Value ~(! ~.-Y~~~:.~ i ~~.. ~ ~~ fit. -~ ~--~ U` rt + r`n'ca~ ~ 1 C ~r~-a~Yn ' ~ 6 ALL BINGO APPLICANTS NOTARIZATION MUST ANSWER QUESTIONS 20 - 27 BEFORE RAFFLE APPLICANTS, GO TO NOTARIZATION. 20, Does your organization unders~had two cahlendarod ys sinhany not be conducted more frequently calendar week? 21. noes your organization undametaThesearecords basedron §18e2p complete records of the bingo g 340.6 of the Code of Virginia and §4.98 of Roanoke County Co e must include the following: uantity, and card value of instant a. A record of. the date, q bingo supplies purchased, as well as the naliesndanddwritten the supplier of such instant bingo supp invoice or receipt i' also required for each purchase of in- stant bingo supplies. b. A record in writing of the dates on which Bingo is played, people in attendance on each date, and the the number of L amount of recmustt bearetained forothree years? ) (These records c. A record of the name ans ecialsBingoa game prizea or jackpot door prize, regular or p from the playing of Bingo is awarded? d. A complete and itemized record oeeawith c thesquarterlyrand ments which support, and that ag annual reports required toable order~tonpermit audit?records must be maintained in reaso 22. Does your organization understand that instant Bingo may only be conducted at such time as regular Bingo game is in progress, and only at such locations and at such times as are specified in this application? 23. Does your organization understand that the gross receipts in ear from the playing of instant Bingo the course of a reporting y may not exceed 33 1/3~ of the gross receipts of an organization's Bingo operation? 24. Does your organization understand it may not sell an instant Bingo card to an individual below sixteen years of age? 25. Does your organization uo erationshth t exceedzorloarehexe gross receipts from all b~.ngo p pected to exceed $75,000 ursuant tolSection 501 ChofltheVUnited granted tax-exempt status p States Internal Revenue Service? (Certificate must be attached.) 7 r 26. Does your organization uode~1lenwhichtauthorizesc this use cat pancy must be obtained or be the proposed location? 2'7, Does your organizationX ess ofnthehfollowingoamounts Dare or merchandise valued in e illegal? a, No door prize shall exceed twenty-five dollars. b, No regular Bingo or special Bingo game shall exceed One Hund- red dollars. c, No jackpot of any nature whatsoever shaackootepaio es awarded Dollars, nor shall the texceedmOnetThousandLDollars. in any one calendar day * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * NOTARIZATION: THE FOLLO ANTS OATH MUST BE TAKEN BY ALL APPLIC I hereby swear or affirm under the penalties of perjury as set forth in §18.2 of the Code °st of mynknowledge a information band statements are true to the be beliefs. All questions have been answered. Signed by: ~~ (~ ~ 1. g~~ I~;i K~:r mix= r ` ~' ~j"~ • ~ ~ ,~ T • le ~'"; y-'~ Home Address N e `, =19 c Subscribed and sworn before me, this '~~ day of ~' My commission expires: 19 Notary Public RETURN THIS COMPLETED APPLICATION T0: COMMISSIONER OF THE REVENUE p,O, Box ?.0409 Roanoke, VA 24018-0513 8 NOT VALID UNLESS COUNTERSIGNED lication, having been found in due form, is approved The above app and issued to the applicant to have effect until December 31st of this calendar year. ~~ ~. l t Commissioner of a Revenue Date The above application is not approved. Commissioner of the Revenue Date 9 t~ ~Y ~ 3 1~~(~ _.~ . ~~ VIRGINIA CCSrCRESS oP PA~tE::.+T: AND TEArHBPS PTAj~'~i~~ (specify} pyiaws of Mason`s cove Elementary School .~._•.._._. ~~~~/County (Specify) cf $nat~k.~__.-------- -- -- in the Appruveu y - March 13, 1996 b local unit membership at its meeting on 1 /~ ~. Signed : ~~'.=~'v._~~` ,--- , Lam,: ~ 4='~"~,, . . president ~/ R secretary f~ ) ~ ~ - .% ..~ :vocal tfnit Bylaws Committee Chairman ~~*,ra~****sr*,t,r**~***rr**~****~r*,t~****u***s,r******~***~a****~rx~r**,~*(gpaC+~ be ow for use by State Bylaws Chairman ar designee only.) App~•oved on behalf of. the F~~ard of Managers by the Virginia Congress Bylaws Committee: State Dyla Committee Date 1989 ~,, ~n 4~ . i ~ ~~ . 4i ~~,~ ~ . .~, ~. t~ SUGGESTEII LOCAL UNIT BYLP,WS $ARTICI,B I - NAMK ~ r.,~~o Fl emet~tarv Parent-Teacher The name of this organization is the M Parent-Teacher Student Association {PTAj ar the ~ county). It is a local PTSA , r~,~,,,~,.,Lp ( ¢~~~~~~ Association { ) pTp,~pTgA unit organized under tah branch f the National Congressrof sParentseand and Teachers (the State PTA), Teachers (the National PTA). **ARTICI.E II _ AIiTICI,RS OF +[7ROANIZATION The articles of oraa.niza~iQn of a local PTA/PTSA includes a, The bylaws of such arganization. oration of such b. The certificate of incorporation or articles of incorp organization {in cases in which thwhateverznamen(i~ ca~eapinawh~ich or the articles of association by the organ~_zatian eriats as an unincorporated association). **ARTICLB IlI _ Pt7ytPOSSS Section 1. The abjects of this P'^,A/PTSA, in common with the Objects of the National PTA are: a. To promote the we:l.fare of children and youth in home, school, community, and i~lac= of worship. b, To raise the sta.nclards of home life. c, To secure adecjuate laws far the care and protection of children and youth. d. To bring into closer relation the home and flee school, that parents and teachers may cooperate intelligently ~n the educE+t ion of children and youth. e, To develop between educators and the general public such united efforts as will. secure for all. csacialnan~dspirit.cza.tee~ucation. advantages in phyaic~l, mental, in cooperation with Section 2. The Objects of this organization are promoted. the State PTA and tand t ie general publigc~; aredclevelopedr hroughrconferencersa parents, teacher, committees, projects, and programs; and are goyecsaed and qualified by the ban .c policies set forth in article IJ. section .~. The organization is organized exclusively far the charitable, scientific, literary ar educational purposes within the meaning of Section 5Ql of the Internal Revenue Code or corresponding Section of any future (c} (3} hereinafter "Internal a'teven~e Code"). Ee~i~:z. al Tax Code .- 1 Via. ~-'~ ~~1 **ARTICLI~ 7.V - HASIC PoLZCTF;S The f711owing are basic policies of thi8 PTA/PTSA: rcial nonsectarian, and a. The organization shall be noncomme •~ nonpartisan. memkiers in their ~- zomote a b. The name of acitiesashallinotobetuaed tnsendorse a°- P official cap artiste n irtere+~tecta commercial concern or ~~ riarrly el t d to promotion of the Obj for any purpose not app P of the organization. or indirectly_--pa.rticipa~.e in c, The organization ahalwa~/tincludingytl~e publishing or distributing or intervene (in any olitical campaign on behalf of, ar in of statements) in any P public office; or devote more than opposition to, any candidate for 1 to influence an inaubal:antial part of its activities to attempting legislation by propaganda or otherwise. rovide quality d, The organization shall work wit outh aril shell Beek to participate education for all childr row ss establishing school policy, in the decision-making p to make decisions has been recognizing that the legal responsibility delegated by the people to the boards of education. anizationa and agencies e, The organization may cooperate with other org paentati.ve Shall make concerned with child welfare, but ahPeTrepresents. no commitments that bind the group anization shall inure to the directors, trustees, f. No part of the net earn.inga of the org benefit of, or be distributebsQn o~ cPpt t~hetathe oregasa~fonoforhall officers or other private p a reasanable comp be authorized and empawer~=d to p Y services rendered and to make payments and distributions n furtherance of the purposes set forth in Article III hereof• an other provision of these articles, the Notwithstanding Y on any other activities ncit permitted g• organization shall not carry t from Federal income to be carried on (i) by an organization exemp or (j.i) tax under Section 501 (c) (3) of the Internal Revenue Code, by an organization, contributions to which are deductible under Section 170 (c) (2) of the Internal Revenue Code. in or adequately h, Upon the diforlthe debts and obligations Toff the o ganizatiorofite providing remaining assets shall be an~~atb~nsdwhichnhave established their funds, foundations, or org c 3 •of the Internal Revenue tax exempt status under Section 501 ( ) ( ) Code. ARTICLg V - M~$R-'HIP AIZD D(~S b virtue which this **Section 1. Eve bernQf°theaNational PTA a de ofothehVirainia PTA by of that fact, a m local PTA/PTSA is chartered, and is entitled to ail benefits of sucw tho~erea P~ **Section 2. Membership in this PTA/PTSA shall be made available ~~ __ _ _ ~~ ?1~ ~ -- ---__ : -- s ' Y ` ~ .J ~~ ~'r w M ~~'~ ~'~~' latir~ns, no} ~~~ under such ~~:ulea and re be prescrired ~~ color, cz~eed or national origin, laws, as may Pcts ~ to race, r:oviaions of the National PTA AY in conflict with the P to any individual who subscribes to the Obj.. Wn the bylaws of this PTA/PTSA, and basic policies of the National PTA. 3. Tp~j-~; PTA/PTSk shall conduct an annual enrollment aL members" b°~`t **SFCtion at any time. persons may be admitted to membership ~, a annual dues of **Section 4. Each member of this PTA/PzSA r~hall 1, Y inia PTA and the ~ to the arganization. The ~o er oayable to the GVirgshall include t.kre part on of sixty (b0) cents per memo P portion payable tc> the National PTA. inia PTA portiQOrtiona ofineach me~rber~sadu.es **Section S. The amount of the Virg. be d4termined by the Virginia PTA. The National 5t~ cents per annum. shall be fifty ( ) aid by each member ortiona of the dues p **Section 6. The State and National PTA p ro°~ic+~.'.• PTA/PISA shall ba set aside by this PTA/PTSA and remitted to td;e Virgin:-,'- PTA through such chann i a and at such times as the State Bylaws ma of this ble for payment to the National PTA of the national (Each state is respoaid by members of this Pia/PTSA. portion of the dues p ,~ aid by each me~rter The State and National PTA po~'t.xons of the du._s p Section ~• ,Par far those local PTAI~PTSA shall be remitted to the treasurer of the Virginia P a ember 1, and by March 1 of eachembers recei•~t'd to a the State Office an or before nec and k,. ;une for additional m 1 members received after Decen~b~'r 1, after March 1. anted by resident of ~~~ #Secti.an 8. The remittan howinduthe names ~ndgaddreasAof the kp acr..om eyr iod covered by a local remittance fnr_xr+ g g organization, the atY~J11T1t of the dues coliev~ed dur~.ug t e p rep,,rt and the number o members of the nr93nization. ate tion 9. Only members of this organization shall be elic~i:~le to parti.cip erve in any of its elective or aPPointi.~r~+ Sec i.n the business meetings or ,.o positions. ear ending #Section 10. All memberships received during the State PTA.fi.acal y June 30 shall expire the following October 31. 3 ~~iY_.'Y~Y i t ~ ' F• '~{~.. i ~`, ARTICLE VI - CF1~IC$RS A]!ID THSTR gI,gCTI0~7 **Section 1. Each officer of this pTA/pTSA shall be a member of #:hi..s PTA/n'T~SA. Section 2. Or"fLC~'rs and their election: The afficcrs of this organization shall consist of a pres~tieratr a' ~~(number) vice-president(s), a seoretacy, and a treasurer. C-fficera shall be elECted by ballot in the month. of ;"~~! _^_.._..---- b. election tar tt,at Hawever, if therevoscbeuvotee T~A~rajority affthe~votes cast sc~a.ll office may be by constitute an election. the al.or.e ~f ~.. Officezs ~shs.ll assume their off ~Inanth) and shal.l~ser e for a term meeting ,-n T rn •_.____.------ the e.c:tttive ofd 2 ~rear(a) or un+.:il their successors are elacte .----- copse^ut ive d. A person shall not be e3.~-gable er $n wh~~' has served in( an office for terms in the same office, ~'~ P more tha-i one-half a full term shall be deemed to have s~:rved a lull terra in such office . Section 3. Nominatinc; committee: (an a, There shall be a nominati^.g^ommittee composed of ~__~-_- no leas than three) members who shall be electe~.~ b~. uneven number. riot to the this PTA../~'~~'~ at a regular meE~ving at. J..east one month P election of ozficers. The committee shall elect it:~ ~c5~rn chairman. cotr~nittee shall s:omirs~.te ors eligible perr+~n for each b, The nominating ulcer mPet3_ng office to be filled ~mantejaratlwhicih~1xt:imr:ssaddtionalgnc~r~ina~ions in 1~-------- may b made frpm the floo:^. c. Only thane persona who have ~rgarfec'.c3gt.ed$tacauchnoffice~rve rf elected shall be naz,inated f Section 4. tlacanciea: such A vacancy occurring in any office shall be filled far the unexpired term by no;:ica of such a person elected by aVea7o In lca~eta vacancy occurstnethe off~i.ce of president, eled~tion having been g° the first vice-~preaident shall serve notice of the eic<;t~.on. ARTICLE VII - 1)I3'1"SEE OP OFFICERS Section 1. The president sha~.l: a, preside at all meetings of the organization. b. Perform such other duties as may be Prescribed in these bylaws or assigned by the organization. c, Be a member ex officio a~: all rammttees except tk~e nc;.:,i.a~ating committee. d, ~oo4:c#inate the wcrk of the ~.:;fficereC~sdmaymbetprc~mcytec:the organization in order that ,tt,e Obj 4 ;. ,~ - __ _ .v---- ~~` i;. ~. -~ . f~, Section 2. The vice-presidents shall: a. ~,ct as aides t.o the president. b T_n their designated order p4rform the. du!:ies of the president in . the absence or i.nai~ility of that officer to act. Sectioa•3• The secretary shall: a. b. c. d. Reccr'd the minutes of al]_ meetings oi:' the organization. Have a current copy of the bylaws. Maintain a membership list. Perform other delegated duties as ashigned. Section 4. The treasurer sY~all: a. b. c. d. e. f. #g• ~h. Have custody of all the funds of the organization. Beep a full and accurate account of receipts and expendi't.ures. Make disbursements as n~thori.zed by the president, executi~heboard, or organization in accorda~~~ce with the budget adogted by organization. Have checks or vouchers signed by tw® Persons, the treasurer and ether person. Present a finahcial at~atement at ever the eexe u tivehboardaiiization and at other times when requested icy Make a full report at the meeting at which new officers of ficially assume their duties (usua3ly the annual meeting). Have the accounts examined annually or upon change of officer by an auditor or an auditing committee of not fewer than three memb~hall lion a atatementh f that fact at the nand of the rel~ortrrect, 9 Submit the book~~ annually for an audit by an auditing committee selected by the executive board at least two weeks before the meeting at which new officers assume duties. Section 5. All oomi~ me to timeer Upon the expi.rationlof Ghent rm of officeaod those assigned fr resident, without in case of resignation, each officer shall turn ertaininthto the office. delay, all records, books, and other materials p g ARTZCLR \iTLI - Is%SCQTIVE gOATc2D Section 1• tteechairmenlof =banding committees and the princ pallofrtheoachool organization, rinci al or elected by the faculty also or a representative appointed by the p P may serve on t the officersbofrt a organization and the principal oftthesschool be elected by '}p da s following the election. of or his representative not more than thirty (: ) Y ~, 5 _. _ _ _ _ ... __ ~,~, „~ ., `~ Fy ~ , ~'' ,;, officers. $~ction 2• The duties of the executive baard shall be: To transact necessary business in the interval ber..wet.. r>rganizats-or. a' such other business as may be referred to it by the m.-meetings and organization. b. To create standing and special committees. c, To approve the plans of work ~~ r the standing commi'--°.:~'es d, To present a report at ~.r~e regular meetings of ttxe organization. E, To select an auditor or an a'.lditing rnmmit~tee to at~ci;;~t the treasurer's accounts. f, To prepare and submit to file organization for adoption a cza<dget for the year. y, To approve routine bills within tY:e 1.:,.mit=s of the b'-;:~`~et. Section 3. Regular meetings of the execuY:iv4 k~oarc5 ~~retlmeet.i yd f theLyeaz~ ' school yeax, the time to be fixed by the board at its ,..Drum. Special. ~ majnri_ty of the executive board membersa111ed1b otheipresideQnt or. a majority mee:.i.zgs for the executive board 5 ay be (number) days' notice t;eing given. of the members of the board, ~ (If a unit de~-ires to include an execut:.ive committee ictomao~e~dof_ tee elected. following executive board. .'ihis committee is usually .~ - ~~~_~-, and the 3ppo=~~t._ e~ d- officers-, SE':e ~?ober~~.~ Rules of oLCier Mewl Revi~~. Pages 400, 4U3, and 484•) ARTIi'LB I% -- t!SRi3TIAIGS Section 1. Regular meetings of the the school yearh~ unlbess oltherwa~~~s~e ?ro (day of week) of each month during ~ (number) days" notice by the organization or by the executive board. _. having been given. y y xesident Section 2. Special meetings of the organizati (numb~~ be do YS°edot.icehhaving been or.. by a majority of the executive board, given. The election meeting shall be held in Mav .~.__~(month}. Section 3. triLCtJ_UT~ *~. ~Cl (number} members shall constitute a :+ucy nfannual trl.nsaction of businessd standingecommittees'h annuagarepor_ts are .in order along meeting the officers an rescribe. 4~...~-~ ~o~--its"s~ Rules with any i.t.ems of business that the b48~ws may p Uf ~Jrde~ 1~ew1y RevisedL pages 80-81, ) Sectioxx 5. vot.ng on routine ma.ttez`s may be by voice, nowe>'~=r. votes on the L,~~laws or amendments, adoption cyf a blldgf?t, adoption of a Project or file election of officers shall be by a show of membership cards with the vote be'~-'19 counted and recorded in the minutes. ,~ . 6 _. _... _ '~~'~a- ';, ARTICLg X Cfl'H2KI'~TS$S j5 r, g able to serve in any Section 1. Only members of this or anizati_on shall be elig" elective or appointive positions. Section: 2. The executive board may creat~ti suc onsthedwork.of the or.9~ izatio~~~ deem nLce~:sarY to promote the Objects and carryear(c}~ or until the sei.ec`ior~ of The term o f each chairran shall be ,___~_ Y a sucresaor. ion of work Section 3. The chairman of each standing committee shall present a P t:ca thy. executive board for approval. No committee work shall be undertaker= without the consent of the executive board. oint ttaeir members rest ower to form special committees and app resident Section 4. The p unless the bylaws delegate this power to the p with the organization ( or the executive board). ARTICLF~ XI - CpttrTCIL t,SgKggR~IP (Applies only to local PTAs holding memberahi_p correspond to council bylaws.) in a council of PTAs, and must. Section 1. Selection of delegates: s of the a, The organization shCounci:1.ropfrparentaTeachertAss°ciata.ons by the prea entdQie ate ofetheir alternates~r Allerepresentativea to a (number} g council must be members of a local unit° d~/~~~~~~~~~ in b, Delegates and th.ei(monthDnates shall be elected ates to gpt-~~nkP C'nu Council of PTAs shall serve for c, Deleg 1__-_ Yea (f s) a term of _______- Section 2. This organization shall pay annual dues ofounc~il bylaws. t~ ~~~ t0 (~~jt~nt , Council of PTAs as provided in the 1' Section 3. Responaibiliti.ea of delegates: a. Delegatasehalllpresent totthetcounciltsuch mattersoashmay bel unit an referred to it by the loc<-1 unit, b, Delegates shall vote as instructed on adoption of projects or on matters of poliry, but shall use their awn discretion on other matters except as provided by council bylaws. the #AR.TICLlI3 %II - DISTRICT p,SgxggRSHIP i„7 _____ District of PTAs. Section 1. This organization is in the Rn Section 2. The function lfunit and ttoccoordinatec the~~policies andw current Virginia PTA and the loco ~-~ 7 . , ~\/j/ ~~ 1~/ g ` ~a Con ~~~ o ~'ar~n~ and Yea~e~ ~r~'n ~ ~ur3u at i4~c ry ~ c ry('9 ~ Lacal jJ1ry ~.tS errs Coun..lls 'FtO?±ir k-Iazel Peck, Treasurer ;ULiJ: Federal Tax Exemption and-Elms ~- t- f c~:r_ ~n 19~€,, the Internal Rerereca n zing ~apl c.f thei~jlocalyunits ~ ~ ex~ nt frozn i Orcup Exemption lets g ?ederal Income Tax under Section ~ 01(c } (3 } of t`:e Internal iteven~ae Code . `;'his also means that donors may deduct c.ozat Be ri ~sts5 le<~ c ies untrans ~er_ s ~ or ~.s provided in Section 170 of ,.he Code ~' our , oca unitf ~:ounci_~. lifts to your local unitlcouncil or for the use ur ases . ire deductible for r^ederal estate and g~.ft ta:~ p p e `Tirginia PTA was subser~ently grari~:ed a GROUP EXEMPTION NTl~'~1}3~`P. ?'see °:ROUP EXEMP'T'ION NT~IBER (GEN) is: 3229. iu,~a_T L~t~.ES ALL OF THIS MEAN? f oitr unit i ca~.incil wishes to be included ir. tris c;raup exempf:.ic.ii g you must s Y s~~.~.ndi~aa° with th°u Virg~.nia P~t':~. (dues 1, 33e a local unit in good. a paid ar~d bylaws up to date) ar..c~ 2. Your EIN (Employer ID Nu_niber) =mu~tab~=s ~~a~dinate:~~lse~~~ ~oa~=he Office to be includ~:d i.n the local units and. caunc:i.ls--•it IRS. (The EIN is required of all is a .nine digit n'~~Ve andElNocr i.fk~t has-been~Osubmi tted toare rot sure that you ha tike State Office, pleasFa contact the ;Mate Offi..ce. of you do a~ot have an EIN, secure an SS4 Form Lr~pm ar1Y -~aca-~- IPS b~-:aric?~. office or the State Oifi'=P. When y°u ge=t the EIN, p1_pase be sure to send that number to the :;sate C3ffice) . _t you prefer to establish Maur au~n exerlpt~cw~~~ldu ~ fer~filir~~fa~-iyour own .023 with the IP.S, but I do Wert '•°now why y f' exemption, whe~~. the only req Ter oadts~a~ ~i ~e C ~d to subm~ h yo:~rw^.glNia PTA` s :rerun Exemption ayes to be ~. g ~i,ce` the exempt..ion is established, ~rou are ex~~~rzpt tram paying :INCOME TA% on 4, ~r~~. moue than Y X5,000, l:,ut less than Toney earned; however, if yc,,:~ g . ;100s000, in a fis~~a1 year, you are req~uir}-:d to file Form 900~~ (Ret.urn of ~rganizatior:s Exempt Fror~s Incf.:n~~~~'I' nd ~ot-Tthe ~escal year ~~? fil.~ld by thc: 15th ia~r of the f~_fth month after t.r~a... e °f a business or indivi~-iual would lii:e~to: make charitable donations ~°olease ~.na.t.lcaunc.il and needs aecop You ~illlthen }~e g verpitaocop~~, of theRExempti.on ,on~~.a^t the State Off~.c Ft ~r:.~r, which you may then copy and reta...r~ in your f_ Iles . tEl~:fiEER--Help us to help yon.---F15~E YOUR E2N Nti~.BEP. GiI'1~? °T'H~ STATE OFFICE ~ ~--1 COUNTY OF ROANORE, VIRGINIA CAPITAL FUND UNAPPROPRIATED BALANCE 9,608 Unaudited Beginning Balance at July 1, 1990 $ Balance as of September 25, 1990 Submitted by Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance 9,608 L-~ COUNTY OF ROArTORE, VIRGINIA GENERAL FUND UNAPPROPRIATED BALANCE Amount Unaudited Balance at July 1, 1990 $2,653,756 Amount reimbursed by County Schools 500,000 July 1, 1990 19901 $3.153.756 Balance as of September 25, Submitted by Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance 1 This amount does not include the estimated addition to fund balance from 1989-90 operations of $2,800,000. L, ~„~ COUNTY OF ROANORE, VIRGINIA RESERVE FOR BOARD CONTINGENCY 1, 1990 $ 50,000 Beginning Balance at July lenient (9,845) August 28, 1990 Roanoke County Code Book Supp $ 40,155 Balance as of September 25, 1990 Submitted by Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance ACTION # ITEM NUMBER ~~ AT A REGULAR MEELDNAT THEHROANOKE COUNTYEADMINISTRATION CENTER COUNTY, VIRGINIA HE MEETING DATE: September 25, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: Accounts Paid - August 1990 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: $3,963,379.12 Payments to Vendors: Payroll: 8/3/90 $ 435,117.88 8/17/90 433,683.01 8/31/90 496,795.06 1 365.595.95 fi~_3~8,975.07 A detailed listing of the payments is on file with the Clerk to the Board of Supervisors. SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED: ~ ~ ~. ~~ ~ ~'~`v Elmer C. Hodge Diane D. Hyatt County Administrator Director of Finance ---- ----------------------- ------------------ VOTE ACTION No Yes Abs Approved ( ) Motion by: Eddy Denied ( ) Johnson Received ( ) McGraw Referred ( ) Nickens To Robers e N AT A REGULAR MEETING T THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD A ON TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 25, 1990 RESOLUTION 9~RM WITHITHENCODEEOFTVIRGINIAING WAS HELD IN CONF WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia has convened an executive meeting on this date pursuant to an affirmative recorded vote and in accordance with the provisions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and WHEREAS, Section 2.1-344.1 of the Code of Virginia requires a certification by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that such executive meeting was conducted in conformity with Virginia law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby certifies that, to the best of each members knowledge: 1. Only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements by Virginia law were discussed in the executive meeting which this certification resolution applies, and 2. Only such public business matters as were identified in the motion convening the executive meeting were heard, discussed or considered by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. On motion of Supervisor McGraw to adopt resolution, carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: J ''// `` ' ~~~ ~ / f B/renda J. Hol on, Deputy Clerk Roanoke. County Board of Supervisors cc: File Executive Session File qqo-~ ACTION NO. A-92590-10 990-1 ITEM NUMBER ,~_ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF TROANOKERDCOUNTY ADMINI TRATIONRCENTER COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE MEETING DATE• September 25, 1990 Public Hearing on County Participation in the AGENDA ITEM• Hotel Roanoke/Conference Center Pro~ec COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: This time has been scheduled for a public hearing on the County's proposed participation in t Ridenour and Raymond Smoot twill obeoat Conference Center. Minnis will make a the public hearing representing Virginia Tech. They brief presentation on the sc ope andt Visitors Bureau twillacalso be the Roanoke Valley Convents present. Following their remora kesaanecommendationcitizens and the Board, staff is prepared to BACKGROUND' In 1989, the Norfolk Southern CorpoY~ation deeded the 100 yearlnca Hotel Roanoke to the Virginia Tech Real Estate Faureedlto~begin The Foundation and the City of Roanoke recently g construction of a conferenc Roanoker County hase also been asked to renovate the Hotel Roanoke. lan to go participate in thmaPlereCrojecte f Roanoke1County chooses not to f orward with a s p participate. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION The Foundation plans to se ~ the Hot 1 Roanoke~s Plans callvfor the construct new facilities a preservation of the existing public areas as well as the historic front marquee. Virginia Tech and the City of Roanoke will construct a new conference center with meetinhotels aThe est m tedncost7 of tthe with the renovation of the proposed conference center is $12 millioneXOanding itsrcontinuing plans to mM?^ket the conference center by p education and conference programs. into the Roanoke Valley, 1 qqo-I encouraging scientific and the ne~ch tel conference center Band conferences and seminars at sponsoring arts and cultural entertainment at the complex. Roanoke County has been asked by Virginia Tech to participate in the $12 million project. This is the first Without g the County's asked for assistance from the County. participation, the conference center will be scaled down to an $8 million facility. Although the Hotel/Conference Center wiWa se located in Roanoke City, the County would benefit in many Y We can take pride in our willingness to support a regional effort and preserving a historical landmark. Roanoke County will also benefit in the following more tangible ways from the additional tourism and visitors it will generate. Commitment from VPI&SU to become a partner in the Roanoke Valley by locating some of its facilities in the community. -- Increased revenue stations,t food sere ce sindustrieseand restaurants, gas shopping centers. Increased tax revenues such as meal taxes and ande eat xin from visitors and tourists who will shop Roanoke County. Potential future economic development growth in the County from the increase in conventions and conferences. Business and industrial conventions held in Roanoke wlow expose many leaders to our excellent labor force, cost of living, excellent schools and scenic beauty. Our quality of life can sell the valley, and thus Roanoke County where the majority of undeveloped land is located. -- Greater visibility and name recognition for the Roanoke Valley. Attached is a summary of the benefits of tourism to Roanoke County prepared by the Roanoke Valley Convention and Visitors Bureau. FISCAL IMPACT' • the extent of the Several proposals have been discussed regarding County's financial participation in this project. Some have suggested an outright donat artici ate eto the s extentaso a $200,000 to allow the County to p P annually for twenty years. There has been some discussion regarding an equal partnership role, whioccuruld require the County to share in operating deficits if they 2 ~-1 There seems to be general agreement that the County should ortunity to share in the profits as participate if there is an opp well.. The task of the sta Count has t e potent al of financial negotiate a means whereby the Y benefit . STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Because of the significance of the Virginia Tech presence in the Roanoke Valley, and because of the economic benefits, I hope that for Roanoke County to participate in th~so we can f ind some way project. The State o is 1 and to the Nat onr sm capital~Xl Roanoke major highways and por , County also benefits from therefore recommendlthat the Board allow historic Hotel Roanoke. I estions of the citizens staff the opportunity to factor in the sugg and board members presented a de the 1City nofa Roanoketto develop again with Virginia Tech suitable alternatives which can be brought back to the Board at its October 23rd meeting. .~ Elmer C. Hod e County Administrator cc: ------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ~ Motion by• Richard W. Robers Denied ( ) to approve staff recommendation Johnson Received ( ) McGraw Referred ( ) Nickens To ( ) Robers File No Yes Abs X x x x 3 ~~ September 19, 1990 SUMMARY S HEFT Fact ~~ 1- Tourism in Roanoke County provides $42,956,000 in total travel expenditures. Generates $9,163,000 in payroll Accounts for 1,078 jobs in Roanoke County Generates $1,852,000 in state tax receipts _ Generates $632,000 in local tax receipts Without the tax monies generated by tourism, the tax burden would have been passed on to local residents and corporations through increased personal property taxes. Fact ~~2 Each dollar turns over 7 times in a community before it is banked. Convention attendees visiting Roanoke County spend an average of $112.00 per day. Fact ~~3 Of each tourism dollar spent in Roanoke County: 30~ is spent in Restaurants 22~ is spent in lodging facilities 18~ is spent in public transportation 13~ is spent for auto transportation 9cC is spent for incidentals (retail) 8~ is spent on entainment and recreation Fact ~~1+ Every time a valley-wide convention is booked the entire valley prospers: hotels/motels restaurants retail gas stations car rental food service companies ROANOKE VALLEY CONVENTION 8L V03S3 20 0 5 BUREAU P.O. Box 1710, Roanoke, VA 24008, ( ) ~IY~`~ Summary Sheet September 19, 1990 Page 2 F a c -t ~~ ~+ ( continued ) utilities banks suppliers advertisers service personnel construction Fact ~~5 We stand a eadyuartershhotel (oneowhogcanlblockd300~400nrooms without a h q at one facility) Fact ~~~ The tax income generated by out of town tourists is spent to improve county services such as: _ Education _ Storm Drainage - Road Repairs - Emergency Vehicles Fact ~~ 7 Every time we do not book a convention in our valley due to our product we all lose tax revenues. Fact ~~8 Tourism produces a higher quality of life for Roanoke County residents through supplimenting our tax base. It provides for better services without using our schools or requiring massive utility or infrastructure investments. f~, .. ROANOKE C OUN Holiday Inn Tanglewood Holiday Inn Airport Econo Lodge Airport Econo Lodge Tanglewood Super 8 Motel Roanoke Motel 6 Airport Sleep Inn Affordable Efficiency Inn Budget Motor Lodge Days Inn Airport Hollins Motel Olympia Inn Roanoker Motor Lodge The Country Inn HOTELS ~ MOTEL S 196 Rooms 162 Rooms 48 Rooms 48 Rooms 62 Rooms 120 Rooms 103 Rooms 56 Rooms 60 Rooms 123 Rooms 29 Rooms 76 Rooms 29 Rooms 4 Rooms (est) 1,116 Total Fact '~ Our best and most competiti a market segment for conventions 1These presently the religious mar et (due to our current product). attendees particularly requ st smaller hotels and motor inns thus enhancing Roanoke County's odel profile. ROANOKE VALLEY COI~VENTIONo&. 035342-06025 BUREAU P.O. Box 1710, Roanoke, VA 240 , ( ) Tab_ 1 Major Competitive Hotel Room SupP1Y Roanoke, Virginia 1988-1995 Estimated Rooms Rooms (1988) (1995) Major Hotels --- 386 415 Hotel Roanoke 320 320 Airport Marriott Holiday Inn Tanglewood 196 196 162 162 Holiday Inn Airport Holiday Inn Civic Center 153 153 148 148 Sheraton Airport Inn 127 127 Holiday Inn South _ 200 Possible New Hotel _- --- 492 1 1,721 Total Available Rooms , Source: ZHA, based on Dec., 1988 L&H Hotel Market Analysis. 9433LEGI ~~o-~ H a O H H a H wz z~ ~ oa ~> ~ ow ~x U O Hz FQ ~n o Ha a w F U U ~' ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~• O o 0 O I 0 l11 O 0 o I I o I C7'~ N O G f0 b ~ ~ e--1 ~ N r-1 r•-1 N e~ CG ~ ~ G d O G O O O O O ~ O O O O O O O O O In ,~ .,~ •r1 O O O CO O l11 O O O p I 00 i11 CO c•'1 v N 1~ lf1 O N tC y ~ ~ ~ N ~ ri r1 r1 7 ~ ~ ~ N •rl ~ c") O O ~' ~ ~ ~ d' I~ N r-I ~D N O O ~ a~ a ,d b ~ a~ o 0 0 °O °O o 0 0 0 0 ~ ~~ o 0 o I o 0 o I o o I o I N O O O N N N N ~ ~ Ul ~ O W .,~ .~, A ~ o 0 0 ~ oo I ° oo I 0 ~ .GG ~ ~ I ~' I d' r•1 r-I r-I x o N w ~ N N ~' ~ ~ S~ ., .{ ~ ~ ~ p ~ }~ O •~ ~ - t ~ ~ O ~ ~ t0 ~ ~ ,'~ ~ £ ~ ~ N >1 ~ ~ tts U GY 7 + •.•i U 3a O fA 3-t ~ 3-i ~ O U -~ +~ ~ a - `~ m ~ ~, ,~,~ U .c ~•+ '~ G +~ N O ~ ~ ~ Q ~ -~ w E+ ~ td UI U ~ ~ U O ~ •~ ~ ~+ O .~ N ~ w r-1 •~ U x ~ D +~ ~ ~+ E-i ~ CT •~ T3 ~ Cw ~ O a O w c ~ ~ O ~ .R ~ b >,O O O O W N W ~~ +~ O •~ -•-~ a +~ ~ a ~ ~ •••i "' w U o H fa o ~ tr a~ ~ 3 -.~ Ul •,.r .C ~ ZT N •r1 c0 O ~ Z ~ U ~ Q Z ~ 7 (/1 Z 7 7 ~ U ro c~ '~ v CA L N ~ ~ O O o .,~ A --~ N a~i sy o ~ 0 0 w •~+ o c ~ a~ ~ > ~ c m o ~ U O ~ o .~C N ~ w t~ o a N ~ -~ O N '~ N O ~ N ~ ~ N b ~ !!1 N a~ N O N U ~ ~ O * U1 ,. H z O H ? H W 2 ~ H z c~ O H :1 7 w ~ O ~ xi • U O Hz E+ ~ to O Ha a w F U U . ~9o-i ~~ o 0 0 0 o O O o .a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 J-~ N p 00 I tL'1 O O O 1 I O 1 r" ~0 ~ ~ ~ e--1 ~ N ~ e-i N e-i ~~ -I ~ ~ O )~ O O O O O O O O O O O N •.1 •.-1 O O O O 11 O O O O O a0 I O CO O U1 O 0o In t•1 G1 UI ~ 117 O CO t Q1 41 Cl N ~ f'1 e--I e-1 :~ f11 fn !; to •rl ~ +~ O c'~ O CO ~ to I~ ~ d' r ~ ~o N Q1 O r-I r-1 r-1 n~ a ~' ~ `~ ~ ~ N G1 m~U o O O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 ~ ~~ c~ 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 o I o ~ ~ ~ ~ O CO CO O O N O ,~ ~ ~ N ~ r•1 N N N O W ~ A N ~ ~ ~ ~ O O A ~ O O O O O I O O o I O ~o O S3 L~ .[ ~ ,n 1 ~ I ~ In o ~ ~ X O N . W ~ 0 7 ~+ O ~ O O w •~+ N C ~ a~ ~ > o c tr o N ZT to U ~ N .~ ~ O ~J .~ ~ •~ U >~ O +~ >~ +~ U ~ +~ ~ O ~ ~ O w c6 ~ ~ O i~ ~ ?, O O a ~ ~ ~ S•a trs N fl, ~ ~ • -~ O ~ U O 3-1 3-1 N C N ~ +~ u ~ a ~ o a~ td a~ U a~ A •~ 111 o C O >,•+ 0 b C O ~ +~ ~ C UI •rl ~s ~ tT U1 Ul C •ri E-~ 'C5 ~ ~ cC U U O ~ •,~ O .~ to ' • i N ~ N O U U ~+-+ ~ 'O b O O r >~ ~ s c w >~ o ' a o a >; s; ~ O ~ A ~ ~ ~ RS cn >~ >, O > b ~ O O t0 0 >~ O Cf w ~ ~ N >`+ o >~ sT a +~ a cn ~ a +~ m N O 3 C 0 •~ •~ C ~ ~ ~ •'-I 10 N a c~ •~ N ld ~"~ ~ •rl U ••-1 1.a 10 •ri U O • • L •r1 ••-{ 3a O tD W U Q ~ •~ U1 •.-{ A O •.a U) U7 U 4~ f~ ~ ~ W 1~ 1a •O Ul \ ~ ~ f~ ~ ~ ~+ ~ O c" ~ `~ U ~ U ~ Q Z ~ 7 C/1 Z ~ -K Cn G1 ~ .~ ~~~.~~ n ~,~ E viRGiNia,CH~R'ERED1882 _ ~ ~ The Honorable Richard W. Robers, Chairman and Members of the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Roanoke County Administrative Center 3738 Brambleton Avenue Roanoke, Virginia 24018 ..1M 4~A ~~ ~~~ Dear Mr. Robers and Members of the Board: Please accept my regrets at not being able to be with you this evening as you discuss the issue of a conference center Tod tame atvithe 1 Internat anal HCity Roanoke. I am presenting part of the P g this week and have other Managers Association Conference in Fort Worth, Texas, official duties at the conference as the chairman of the Virginia Local Government Managers Association. I did, however, want to publicly say that the City of Roanoke welcomes the participation of Roanoke Countyand imuortang project that weebelieve will have Hotel Roanoke. It is a viable P long lasting benefits for the entire Roanoke Valley. Much like the star on Mill Mountain, the Hotel Roanoke is seen as a symbol It has a sentimentality that speaks to us all. And yet, of the Roanoke Valley. at the same time, the ho el musto make sense economically er Ourd disc ssions with loper to renovate the the Roanoke Regional Vi vated Hotel Roanoke nwould abring ebenefitsetotthe entire ference center and repo sho buy gasoline and P~ valley as people at conferences and the hotel eat, we see a purchase retail products throughout our communities. In addition, value beyond measure in forming an even stronger relationship between Virginia Tech and the Roanoke Valley. Please know that we stand ready to provide whatever information we have available to assist you in making a businesslike decision. Sincerely, .~ W. Robert Herbert City Manager WRH/ga Room 364 Municipal building 215 Church Avenue, S W. Roanoke, Virginia 24011 (703) 981-2333 .:. a ~~ E r, ..rn ~~,: ~ ,~. -- '~-~ ~ _ 9~3y ~90 ~T . ~~ ~~ r1~~ The Honorable Richard W. Robers, Chairman and Members of the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Roanoke County Administrative Center 3738 Brambleton Avenue Roanoke, Virginia 24018 ~--~ a'-~''-~ Dear Mr. Robers and Members of the Board: Please accept my regrets at not being able to be with you this evening as you discuss the issue of a conferencef c the r rograme atvithe 1 Inteo national HCity Roanoke. I am presenting part o p Texas, this week and have other Managers Association Conference in Fort 'dorth, official duties at the conference as the chairman of the Virginia Local Government Managers Association. however, want to publicly say that the City of Roanoke welcomes the I did, participation of Roanoke Countyand importang pr ject thate weebelievexwill have Hotel Roanoke. It is a viable long lasting benefits for the entire Roanoke Valley. Much like the star on Mill Mountain, the Hotel Roanoke is seen as a symbol It has a sentimentality that speaks to us all. And yet, of the Roanoke Valley. at the same time, the efforts to build a conference center Ou d discussions with loper to renovate the hotel must make sense economically. _ the Roanoke Regional Visito d Hotel Roanoke nwould abring ebenefitsetotthe entire ference center and renovate oasoline and buy valley as people at conferences and the hotel eat, shop, we see a purchase retail products throughout our communities. In addition, value beyond measure in forming an even stronger relationship between Virginia Tech and the Roanoke Valley. Please know that we stand ready to provide whatever information we have available to assist you in making a businesslike decision. Sincerely, W. Robert Herbert City Manager 5~o-~ WRH/ga Room 364 Muniapol Duudina 2 ? ` ~,-,~,,;:h aver ._ _ ?rcr~ 4e Vlrc', ..: -=~%' - ~ `"~ ~' ~'-~ 9~25~90 d Members pI•IFERENCE CENTER pgpJECT Boar Hodge L gpp,NOKE C supP°rt Mr. gOTE is°rs t He cannot G LIC HEARIN e the suPe~p ect• act IN gE~ pUB called tO urg erence pr 7 gnomic imp Conf ec was one porter Said e goanoke t this 1• prank Hotel today and Said funding for Baring to valley - at p,irp°rt be at pbe 1 signlficanet bearding up cannot be Pr ject that would g ed and Said that She like to call and would gelmar-dollar ub~~c eearin ect . 2• Francetonight for p o th pr°~ here ou tO supP encourage Y Brenda iviy name is R. H. Myers. I am speaking on behalf of the Southwestern Virginia Building and Construction Trades Council, an organization comprised of various construction craft unions of this area. I am also a resident of North Roanoke County. ~,,,~C ~t ~~~ `~%~~`~~' ' You may recall that I addressed this body at the August 28th meeting. At that time I expressed the Building Trades' concerns over the possible involve- ment of the County with the City of Roanoke and the VA Tech ~~e Foundation in the Hotel Roanoke renovation project. At that time 1 stated that we support the purpose and scope of this project. Our concerns, however, focused on the implementation of the project. According to correspondence from Dr. Smoot, VA Tech Vice President for Business Affairs, the selected developer will be responsible for contracting a majority of the work at the Hotel Roanoke site. We fear that the developer may opt fora "selective bidding" process versus an open-competitive bidding process. In a selective bidding process, the developer solicits bids from a few invited bidders of his choosing. An advertised open competitive bidding process assures all competent contractors of an equal opportunity to be selected for the project. It is this process that is utilized on all public works and most large construction projects. While there is nothing illegal about a selective bidding process, we feel it inappropriate for a project funded by public monies to be awarded by a process which may tend to discriminate against any segment of the community. Be these monies appropriated from general funds, revenue bonds or general obli- gation bonds. That is why we are requesting that Roanoke County make their participation in this project conditional upon the utilization of an advertised open-bid process by the developer. We feel a competitive bid process would assure the county of the highest quality construction available at the most competitive price. It would also be more assurance to local workers and suppliers of an equal opportunity to -2- participate in this project. The perils of giving the developer free rein are easily illustrated by the Dominion Tower Project. The developer, Faison ~ Assoc., of Charlotte, N.C. announced the general contractor, F. N. Thompson, of Charlotte, N.C., two (2) days after the city council approved it's participation in the project to the tune of 11 million dollars. Within days, various sub-contractors contacting F. N. Thompson were told that several sub-contracts had already been negotiated. Uur members were effectively shut out of the project. So, now we have a major construction project, paying local taxpayer's money to out-of-state suppliers and contractors who for the most part, utilize their own migrant work force. And when I say migrant I am referring literally to a work force the majority of which are from out of the country. Personally, 1 do not believe that there is such an acute shortage of workers in this area that construction laborers have to be imported. An open bidding process cannot guarantee that the end result will not be the same on the Hotel Roanoke project; only additional prequalifications of the contractors can guard against this abuse, but we are confident that given a fair and equal opportunity we can strive to secure this work for local workers. Therefore with that in mind we would suggest that the following prequalifications be adopted by this governing body before it would become entangled with the I~iotel Roanoke project. All potential bidders and their sub-contractors comply with the following: 1. Show reasonable effort to utilize the regional work force. 2. Incorporate astate-certified apprenticeship or training program. 3. Show proof of experience in the particular type of construction and have adequate administrative and logistic capabilities to perform the contracted work. 4. Provide proof of up-to-date tax payments, licenses, (Unemployment Compensation, Social Security, Federal, State and Local taxes). 5. Provide a bonafided Pension Program adhering to all ERISA guidelines. -3- 6. Provide a bonafided Health Insurance plan with Employer contributions. 7. Provide federal I.D. number, for all bidders and their sub-contractors. 8. Provide proof of financial stability. 9. Be prepared to identify themself as an independent company, or if a subsidiary then the parent company. Identify all subsidiaries that it owns. 10. Maintain an established functional grievance procedure to resolve any problems which may arise between the employer and the employees. 11. Agree that if found to be in violation or debarred from bidding on any other publically funded work will consider themselves disqualified. ~ ES ~ /~l~ ~<<° ~~ `' ~ ~ (~ ,~ ~~ ~~ aJ~ ~~q o vl ~ SECTION ~ Local labor urged on projects Hos ital bond issue p council a royal jets pp `'' the hospital and B JOEL TURNER lion projects by yMUNICIPAL WRffER Roanoke pity Councilman William White wants Roanoke Me- morial Hospital to use contractors, subcontractors and laborers from Roanoke and Southwest Virginia on protects that will be financed with a S 17 3 million tax-exempt rev- enue bond issue that was approved Monday night by City Council. White said he realizes that no public funds are involved in the bond issue, but "I'd like for local contractors and laborers from this area to get a chance to work on these projects." White, who became a council- man July 1, said he will press for Roanoke Valley companies and workers to be hired to build public- ly financed projects. "For the next four years, I am going to be asking about hiring local contractors, subcontractors and la- borers on public projects," he told City Manager Robert Herbert. The revenue from the for new bonds will be used to pay construction, renovation, equip- ment and refinancing old debt at Roanoke Memorial, Community Hospital and Franklin Memorial Hospital, all members of the Cari- llon Health System. Most of the money will be use to pay for projects at Roanoke Me morial and Community. They include aseven-story medical towe at Roanoke Memonal and an ob stetrics unit at Community. Councilmen James Harvey an David Bowers said they share White's views on hiring local con tractors and workers for constru city. "I get a little uneasy when firms aze brought in from North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia and other places to do projects here," Harvey said. AI Knighton, an attorney who helped prepare the bond issue for Roanoke Memorial Hospital, as- sured the council members that their comments would be relayed to Thomas Robertson, Carillon presi- dent. Robertson said earlier that Beers Construction Co. of Atlanta has been selected as the contractor, but he expects as much as 75 per- cent of the work would be subcon- tracted to companies , in Roanoke and Southwest Virginta. White suggested that council should have been briefed on such a large bond issue. He said he knew only the details that he had read in a newspaper story about the bonds. "Something of this magnitude, I hope in the future you would give us a briefing," White said. Roanoke Memorial officials did not realize ~~Shton said~ed such a briefing, Since no public funds are in- volved and the city does not have any liability, Knighton said, that is d why there was no briefing. The bonds will be issued by the will city's Industrial Development Au- r thonty. They aze not a legal obhga- - lion of the city. They will be repaid with revenues from the projects. d Carillon is the largest health- d care system in Virginia and the larg- - est employer in the Roanoke Valley c- with 4,575 workers. Mr. Chairman, members of the Board, my name is Ed Kohinke, Sr. I live in Bradshaw, and I'm the president of the Mason Cove Civic Club. in the Hotel Roanoke I'm opposed to the County investing project. At a recent meeting of the Mason Cove Civic Club with a resolution was passed 24-0 which, in so many 24 members present, ro ect. , words, opposes the County's investment iI mentionlotebecause both While Explore is not our topic tonight, projects are closely related; and, had we had the time to do so, I'm confident that the ClubheoHodtelaRoanokelp~oject~assed a sim- ilar resolution regarding osed to osed to the project itself, nor am I opp I'm not opp the greater goal of maintaining the Valley's economic viabrolect 0 osed to the County investing money in this p j I'm simply PP because it appears that the City of Roanoke and the Virginia Tec Foundation will be able to adequately seed this project without there are plenty of projects, big and small, within our help; and, the County on which this money could be better spent. There are some projects in our Club's service area alone for just a fraction of the money that might be invested which, ro ects, might reap greater in Explore or the Hotel Roanoke p j gains for the County over the long. the money. Finally, there's always the option of not spending this In light of the currontiontlolt1sathesoneeIbwould takees, might be the better p 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111J ~IIIIIIillllllllllllilillllll ~, `p _ ~„d _ - ~ - _ ~. _ _ E ARAN CE REQUEST _ APP _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ~ ~._ _ _ ITEM N ~ ~' `~ _ _ _ AGENDA O _ SUBJECT f ~.~ . ~.. ~ ~ 1' ~:.~~ ~. 4 x = 4 ~~ -_ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to -_ reco nize me during the public hearing on the above matter g WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, so that I may comment. _ _ _ _ I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FORTH _ _ -' RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINE _ _ _ _ LISTED BELOW. • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment _ c whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on and {oe, c and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the ma~onty of the Boar _ do otherwise. eakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Ques- • S __ lions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. _ • All comments must be directed to the Boazd. Debate between a recognized _ __ speaker and audience members is not allowed. _ kers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. c • Both spea c • S eakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments __ p c with the clerk. __ • INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT c THEM. = PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO DEPUTY CLE NAME _ - _ _ __ . ADDRESS 5 ~/ ~l ~' ~ ~~~ ~'~ ` ~ ~ r ~~r~~'r , _ r _ _ . c PHONE ~ ~,~ ~.I - ~-~' ~ ""~ _ c ' Ililllllllllllllllllillllill l l l llilliilllllilllllllllliiliil lllllllllllllllllllllllllliillllllllllllllllliilllll mllillllllllil I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I l~ J,I,I j~~llllllllilllllilillll __. _ _ . - ~~ - _ - _ - _ ~., - _ - . - _ _ EARANCE REQUEST = APP _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ - AGENDA ITEM N . _ _ c - SUBJECT - _ _ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to _ - reco nine me during the public hearing on the above matter - WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, - so that I ma comment. c - I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR T c c - RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINE _ - _ __ - LISTED BELOW. • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment - "~ whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will = decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, -_ - will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to = and = do otherwise. _ • S Bakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Ques- - ._ - lions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. - - • All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. c __ • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. • re re uested to leave any written statements and/or comments Speakers a q with the clerk. - ___ • INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION - FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT - _ - THEM. - = - PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO DEPUTY CLERK - - - - - - - _ - - NAME `~ ~.~ < y = - / . - - /CF - ADDRESS ~ 53 3 L~ ~ ~ __ PHONE ~_ ~° 3) ~G 2 L~ 1~~~ - IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIilllllllllll IIIlillillilllllllllllllllllllilillllllilllllllllllillillilllllllilllllilllllllll mlillll iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii~~~~~11J - R, _ ,r _ .1 _ ~~ -~-- _ - _ RE VEST = APPEARANCE Q = _ _ _ _ _ - AGENDA ITEM NO. _ - B ECT , , ,~~ ~ ?~~ c l _ _ _ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to = reco nine me during the public hearing on the above matter - WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, t . so that I may commen - WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FORTH - _ _ I - _ RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES - - _ = LISTED BELOW. _ _ _ • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will _ i _ _ _ ssue, decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an c nd will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to a _ c do otherwise. c • S eakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Ques- of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. _ ri ons _ • All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized __ -_ speaker and audience members is not allowed. - - _ • h s eakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. c Bot - p c - • Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. -_ __ • INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED LE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION GROUP SHALL FI '- FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT - - _ = THEM. - _ E PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO DEPUTY CLER PLEAS _ , c NAME - -_ ~ ~ ~~ S 3 ~ .~~` _ ADDRES - _ , c PHONE - ~ ~y ~ '~ m..... iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii~~~~~~~11,I,I ~. -_ _ 7 _ 41 ~~~~ _ o `,.. ..~- .~ NCE RE VEST _ APPS ARA Q _ - - - - _ __ -_ - = AGENDA TT~"'t ~vn_ ~ °~ ~ `" ~ _ _ _ _ _ SUBJECT - = I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to _ _ reco nine me during the public hearing on the above matter WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, so that I may comment. _ - _ I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR T - - RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINE - _ _ - LISTED BELOW. _ _ • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment _ whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, c and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the ma~arity of the Board to do otherwise. c _ • S eskers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Ques- -_ lions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. • All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. • Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments _ c with the clerk. - _ -_ • INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION _ FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT - _ - _ - THEM. _ PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO DEPUTY CLERK _ _ - - _ _ - _ _ ~ ., - - J '- NAME ~' (} ~' _ ~ - ~~ ~ _ _ _ ADDRESS ~l ~~ _ _ _ __ PHONE ~ ~ r ~ a c _ m.... iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiitiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii~~i~~~t~ _ ,, _ _ ~ _ _ ~; _ - ~ - -_ - _ _ APPEARANCE REQUES = _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ AGENDA ITEM NO. - - SUBJECT F~-- ~~- - - - - _ - - I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to = reco nize me during the public hearing on the above matter - WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, = so that I may comment. _ c = I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR TH _ _ _ RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINE - _ __ LISTED BELOW. _ • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment = __ whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, -_ and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to _ _ -_ do otherwise. _ _ • S Bakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Ques- P __ tions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. _ • All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized __ '- speaker and audience members is not allowed. _ __ c -_ • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. • kers are re uested to leave any written statements and/or comments c Spea Q with the clerk. __ • INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION _ FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT - i THEM. _ PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO DEPUTY CLER _ - - _ _ ~ - ,_. _ NAME ~~,~ ~' .~ ADDRESS ~~-~ b ~ ~-~~' y'~'~ _ • PHONE ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ -Z 19 _ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~j~~j~~~~~jj~~~~~~~~~jj~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ m Iilillllilllllililllllllllllllillllillilllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllillllllilllllllllllllllllllllillllllllll~111111 1~,~11111111111111 F~:-~-~~ _~ f,~ - ~ j -_ 4._e~f~ = PEARANCE REQUEST AP _ - - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ AGENDA ITEM NO. ~ _ - _ _ _ ~ ;~-Q , ~ - _ = SUBJECT ° - _ - I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to _ = reco nize me during the public hearing on the above matter WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, so that I may comment. _ _ - - I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR TH - - - RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINE - _ _ _ __ LISTED BELOW. • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will c = decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless -instructed by the majority Qf the Boardto __ do otherwise. • S eskers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Ques- lions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. • All comments must be directed to the Boazd. Debate between a recognized __ speaker and audience members is not allowed. __ -_ • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. • r re uested to leave any written statements and/or comments Speakers a e q c with the clerk. ___ • INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION - FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT - i THEM. - - - _ PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO DEPUTY CLER - - -_ - - - NAME ~ ~ ~' r--~" ~- -_ • -_ • ADDRESS ~ 7 `-~ .3 © ~ r PHONE IIIIIIIIIillllilllllliilillilllllilllllllllllllllilliillllilillilllliiillllllilllilllllllllliilllllllliliilllllllllllllll mlll iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiuiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii~ ~iiiiiitiiiiiiiiiiiiniiii ~ _ _. - _ - _ - _ - ~~ _ ~ _ PE ARAN CE REQUEST _ AP _ _ - - _ _ _ _ AGENDA ITEM NO. ~~~ c _ -.__ _ -- - _ _ SUBJECT ~n ~,` ~ ~~~;.~,u~~,c ~_ ~~~~~t"~~ `~ __ _ _ _ = I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to _ reco nize me during the public hearing on the above matter WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, so that I may comment. _ - _ _ I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FORTH - - _ RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINE - _ _ _ LISTED BELOW. _ c • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment _ "~ whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will = decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, =_ nd will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to a = =_ do otherwise. _ • S Bakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Ques- tppons of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. -_ • All comments must be directed to the Boazd. Debate between a recognized __ "' speaker and audience members is not allowed. c _ _ • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. __ • Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments c with the clerk. ___ • INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT _ - _ - THEM. _ _ PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO DEPUTY CLERK __ NAME ~ ~ =~, ~, ~ y; , ~ - ~~ ;:~,, _ _ _ '_ ADDRESS ' i~ ~ , ,~ ;~ ',y_;~~=i/~c ~1 ~~'t~ ~. _ ; _ _ , _ _ , _ '- PHONE ~ ? `~ - _ m iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii~~~~~11,I - ~~ ~; - - - _ . __, _ _ ~, _ RE VEST ~~....~ APPEARANCE Q _ - _ - - _ _ _ _ c AGENDA ITEM NO. ~ I ~ ~ ~ , (~ can . C P~"~t''= _ SUBJECT r ~ '~ _ _ __ _ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to - reco nine me during the public hearing on the above matter _ WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, so that I may comment. _ _ - I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR T _ _ RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINE _ - _ _ __ LISTED BELOW. • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment __ whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, c and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to ,= do otherwise. _ _ • S eskers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Ques- P =_ tions of clarification maybe entertained by the Chairman. _ • All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized __ "" speaker and audience members is not allowed. -_ • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. __ • Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments -_ c with the clerk. __ ___ • INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION _ FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. _ PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO DEPUTY CLER _ - _ - _ - 5 -~ NAME ' _ - - '_ 1 ~~ ADDRESS I _ ~~ [~~~ PHONE m iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii~iiiiiiiiiiii~iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii~~~t~~~ii~ ~iiiiiii~aiiii _ _ -.~ - ~~ - _ ~,~, - ~ :~ . ERE UEST APPEARANC Q = - - - - - - _ _ _ _ =_ =_ - AGENDA ITEM NO. ~ o - - - SUBJECT - - - I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to = reco nize me during the public hearing on the above matter - WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, t . _ so that I may commen - - WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FORTH _ I - - RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINE - _ - _ _ LISTED BELOW. _ _ _ _ • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will i = - ssue, - decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an - and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to _ do otherwise. _ _ _ • S eskers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Ques- lions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. - _ • All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized __ -' speaker and audience members is not allowed. - - - • h s eskers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. Bot - - p c - _ •Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. -_ • INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED LE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION GROUP SHALL FI - FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT - - - - = THEM. - SE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO DEPUTY CLER PLEA NAM t ~. - ~ ? z , - - - ~ 13 Sys ~~ti . ~a~ ~o~ ~ ADDRESS , -_ - ~ (/ PHONE ~ ~' m... IIIIIIIIIIillllllllllllllllllllllllilllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllilllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll~ll,(11 j~,~llillilallllllllllll _ _ _~~ -_ _ - ~ ~• ' `, ~~ rj ~. - ~ /, ~~ ~~ VEST ~~:~ APPEARANCE RE Q _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ~~~_ _ - AGENDA ITEM NO. _ - SUBJECT ~• _ _ - __ _ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to _ reco nize me during the public hearing on the above matter _ WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, - so that I ma comment. _ _ - I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FORT _ - RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINE _ _ _ _ _ _ LISTED BELOW. _ • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment _ -_ whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, =_ "' will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of-the Board to and c __ do otherwise. Bakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Ques- _ • S __ tipons of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. _ • All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized __ speaker and audience members is not allowed. c _ _ • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. __ • Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments -_ c with the clerk. __ c ___ • INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION _ FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT '"' THEM. - PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO DEPUTY CLERK _ ,r~ c NAME ~, ~ t{ N~ f 5~1 - ~ = ADDRESS~~ ~ D E''~'t S ~ ~un c' /~`" 1 ~~~ ! PHONE ~ ~ 7 ` ~ l ~ c iilllllllilllilllllilillllllllillllliilllilllilllllllillllllllllllllillllllllllillllllllllllllllillllllllllillll milllllllill IIIIIIillillllllllllllllllllllllllllllilllllllillllilllllllillllllllllllllllillllllllllllllllllllllllllllll,(1J ~IIIIIIl~IIIIIIIIIIIII ~ _ a ;~ y ~. .~ ~_:,~ .~ EARANCE REQUEST APP _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ - _ _ _ _ - s - AGENDA ITEM NO. ~ °i0 ' -_ ~ ~ _ _ - SUBJECT r~-'~c~ '~ r - I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to _ - reco nize me during the public hearing on the above matter WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, so that I may comment. _ I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FORTH c c - - - RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINE LISTED BELOW. __ • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, =_ - will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to c and c do otherwise. c • S eakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Ques- -_ t ons of clarification maybe entertained by the Chairman. • All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized __ - speaker and audience members is not allowed. • th s eakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. $O p • Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments -_ c with the clerk. °__ • INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION _ FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. - PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO DEPUTY CLERK - - - - NAME t~~' ~C~C - ... __ ADDRESS 5a1`~ (3c~rrc~- ~~ ~~r~er~r. ~-r,-~or~ __ , PHONE ~`~b • 500 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIillillllillllll 111111 l I IIIIIIIIIillllllllllllillllllllilllill Iilllliillll Ilillllillllllillillllllillll mlll ,~ ~~ ~ ~, AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OUNTY A MINISTRATION CENTER~NTY VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE C 1990 TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 25, DENIAL OF ORDINANCE 92590-11 AN EXISTING PLANNED SIT CATED SOUTH OOF KELLYC LANE IN THE REAL ESTATE LO CAVE SPRING O MAGI ALLISON ASSOCIATESUpON THE APPLICATION WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on Au ust 14, 1990, and the second reading and public hearing was held g on September 25, 1990; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on August 7, 1990; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: DENIED on motion of Supervisor Robers, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES• Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Brenda J. Ho ton, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Develo ment & Inspections Arnold Covey, Director, P Terry Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning John Willey, Director, Real Estate Assessment q~o~-~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY VIRGINIA, HELD ATUESDAYOASEPTEMBERT25ADM99I0STRATION CENTER, ORDINANCE TO AMEND AN EXISTING PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT ON A 2 ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCASTERIAL D STRICT UPONETHE APPLICATION IOF MAGI J. ALLISON ASSOCIATES WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on August 14, 1990, and the second reading and public hearing was held on September 25, 1990; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on August 7, 1990; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That an existing Planned Unit Development Final Plan on a 2 acre tract of real estate, as described herein, owned by Northview Corporation and located south of Kelly Lane in the Cave Spring Magisterial District be changed from open space to the construction of a 16-unit single-building condominium; and 2. That this action is taken upon the application of J. Allison Associates. 3. That the applicant has voluntarily proffered in writing the following conditions which the Board of Supervisors hereby accepts: a) Applicant shall construct in substantial conformity the improvements depicted on the concept plan submitted by Berkley-Howell Assoc., showing a single multi-family residential structure consisting of 16 condominium dwellings. ~~~~ b) Existing tree cov eas of the usite t property shall remain on undeveloped ar c) All underground parking areas shall be equipped with a sprinkler system. 4. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: Beginning at a point which is the northeast corner of Lot 22, Section 1, Phase III,.Ruxton of Roanoke, and going N. 81 deg. 47' 36" E. 200 feet to a point; thence S. 03 deg. 32' 3~oxE_ 425.59 feet to a point; thence S. 65 deg. 01' 10" W. app mately 238.5 feet to a point; thence N. 51 deg. 45' 25" W• 134.16 feet to a point along the southern boundary of Kelly Lane; thence along said boundary of Kelly Lane in a northeast- erly~direction consisting of three curves, captioned "F," "G," and J on the subject survey plat to a point thence N rt58 eastern corner of the boundary of Kelly Lane; deg. 55' 16" E. 40 feet to a point; thence N. 40 deg. 12' 24" E. 84.51 feet to the point of beginning, and consisting of 2.0 acres plus or minus, as shown on a preliminary site plan by Berkley & Howell Associates for J. Allison Associates, dated June 15, 1990. 5. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. 8~o=-t~ ~r>~. _,_ PETITIONER: J. ALLISON ASSOCIATES CASE NUMBER: 24-8/90 Planning Commission Hearing Date: August 7, 1990 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: August 28, 1990 A. REQUEST Petition of J. Allison Asso ct tto erm t n onstruction oflanl6dunitt Development on a 2 acre tra P single building condominium, located south of Kelly Lane, Cave Spring Magisterial District. B. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION resented the Mike Pace, representing the homeowners association p 1979 concept plan t ro osed development would reduce thesgreen space space. He said the p P He provided copies of required by the PUD ordinance considerably. osed to the 48 letters written by Stonehenge homeowners who are opp request and summarized their concerns: circuish sales of this type inadequate turnaround; increased traffic; slugg of condominium. Referring to the roDedefinallplan unlessdtheytare amendments may be made in the app shown to be required by changes in conditions that have occurred or by changes in the development policy of the community. Mrs. June Gray stated her h me r the loss of pgreen dspacepmstreetuis invade the privacy of her too narrow; flooding problems. C. SIGNIFICANT IMPACT FACTORS FIRE PROTECTION: Fire service can be provided. Site must meet water supply standards for fire flow. Adequate access for emusteribe vehicles must be provided. Fire lanes (18' width) designated. Slope of site, proposed site layout, width of Kelly Lane, and lack of turnaround area make access to this site difficult for emergency vehicles, esp are sl greaaer thank 10, 000 sq fdin or°at requires enclosed parking least 50 percent underground to be sprinkled. Petitioner's proposed building qualifies under both conditions. RESCUE: Same as above. D. PROFFERED CONDITIONS 1) Applicant shall construct in substantial conformitBerkle1mHowell ments depicted on the concept plan submitted by Y- Assoc. , showing a single mri is if2 m Ex stingetreelcovrercton thensubject of 16 condominium dwells g ) shall remain on undeveloped areas of the site. 3) All property ed with a sprinkler system. underground parking areas shall be equipp E. COMMISSIONER'S MOTION, VOTE AND REASON Mr. Witt expressed concern elfin charactersof rPUDhttherestimated130 the roadway, complete chang percent grade slope with two retaining walls; incompatible with existing community. He moved to deny the PUD amendment. ,~~ 7 " -~ `~`~~`~ Mr. Robinson said that a precedent could be set by allowing development of green space ~ °th theafollowing rolldcal lv ote•d the motion. The motion carrRobinson, Gordon AYES: Winstead, Witt, NAYS: None ABSENT: Massey F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE None. ENTS: Concept Plan ~' vicinity Map G. ATTACHM Other ~/ Staff Report i ~. .~~ „,..-~ 11s,..~___ _. Terrance Harington, ecretary Roanoke County Plan ing Commission Note: Mary Allen has copies of the letters of opposition written by Stonehenge homeowners. ~ ~~ - -~~' ~, 1 STAFF REPORT ~ NUMBER• 24-8/90 PETITIONER: J. Allison Associates iEWED BY: Lynn Donihe DATE: August 7, 1990 Petition of J. Allison Associates to amend an existing Planned Unit Development to permit construction of a 16-unit, single building condominium on a 2 acre tract, located south of Kelly Lane, Cave Spring Magisterial District. 1. NATURE OF REQUEST a. Petitioner requests amendment to final development plan of Ruxton of Roanoke Planned Unit Development (Stonehenge) in order to construct a 16-unit condominius building. The final development plan for the PUD, showing a total of 37.58 acres and 290 units, was approved in May 1975. Since that time, there have been several amendments to the final plan: 1975 -- reduce the number of units in Phase 1 to 65 and relocate buildings and roads. 1979 -- relocate 22 townhouse buildings and lots in Phase 3 (Kelly Lane townhouses) 1979 -- change 5 apartment groups of 72 total units (Phase 3) to 2 condominium buildings with 56 total units (Kim Court) 1981 -- reduce the number of units in Phase 1 to 60 and relocate 2 buildings 1981 -- reduce the number of units in Phase 2 to 50 1981 -- rezone 4.677 acres to R-3 and add to PUD. Add 44 units 1981 -- rezone 1.163 acres to R-3 and add to PUD. Add 3 units The amendments reduced the total number of units approved to 235 and increased the area within the PUD to 43.41 acres (5.41 units/acre). 227 units have been constructed within the development. According to the amended final development plan, 4 of the 8 remaining approved units are located in Phase 1 and four are located in Phase 3 in the two condominium buildings. (See also "Applicable Regulations") b. Attached concept plan and vicinity map describe project further. 2. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS a. Property is zoned R-3 with a PUD district overlay. The land use, arrangement of buildings and uses, and density of development of land lying within a PUD is controlled by the final development plan approved by the Commission and Board of Supervisors rather than by the underlying zoning district. b. Any changes in use, any rearrangement of lots, blocks, and building tracts, any changes in the provision of common open spaces and all other changes in the approved final plan shall be made by the Board of Supervisors. No amendments may be made in the approved final plan unless they are shown to be required by changes in conditions that have occurred since the final plan was approved or by changes in the development policy of the community. (Section 21-41-1-M(b)) c. Site plan review will be required to ensure compliance with County Regulations. ~~.`'~\ ~~..-. . 2 3. SITE a CHARACTERISTICS Topography: The site slopes sharply upward from Kelly Lane. iduous d . b. ec Ground Cover: Site is heavily forested with mature gum, sourwood, cherry, maple of oaks , , trees (several types locust) and evergreens (Virginia and white pine). 4. AREA CHARACTERISTICS ture Growth Priority: Situated within the Cave Spring Community F a. u Planning Area. Designated as a stable growth area, currently receiving urban services. is developed with multi-family housing, single- b. General area family housing, and recreation facilities. 5. LAND Rati USE IMPACT ASSESSMENT ng: Rate each factor according to the impact of the proposed acti 1 = on. Use a scale of 1 through 5. ositive impact, 2 = negligible impact, 3 = manageable impact, 4 bl i = di p e. ca sruptive impact, 5 = severe impact, and N/A = not appl RATING FACTOR COMMENTS LAND USE COMPATIBILITY Comprehensive Plan: 1985 Comprehensive Development Plan has ti 3 a. on. placed this area within a Development Land Use designa densities of 4-8 units Planned Residential Developments, at gross desireable within the Development designation. per acre, are Petitioner's request would increase the gross density within the PUD to less than 6 units per acre. b Surrounding Land: Site is surrounded within the PUD by multi- d . family condominiums, single-family attached townhouses, an undeveloped common open space. ~ c. Neighboring Area: Neighboring area includes multi-family and office development, institutional uses, and usin h il g, o y single fam recreation facilities. 3 d. Site Layout: Concept plan indicates condominium building will cover approximately 18.85$ of the proposed 2 acre site. Density of the site will be approximately 8 units/acre. The addition of 16 units to the PUD as a whole will increase the gross density to 5.78 units/acre. See also attached concept plan. 3 e. Architecture: See attached building elevation. 3 f. Screening and Landscaping: No screening or buffering is required by the Zoning Ordinance. No specific plans have been proposed. 3 g. Amenities: Adequate parking (32 spaces per ordinance) will be located under the proposed building. The PUD ordinance requires 25 percent of the land area within the PUD boundary (exclusive of pavement, buildings, walks, patios, parking areas, and similar improvements) to remain as open space. Excluding this site, an estimated 11+ acres, or 25$ of the PUD acreage, remain as common open space, developed and undeveloped. This estimate does not include any unpaved front, side, or rear yards of town houses. However, a development plan submitted with a 1981 amendment to the PUD identifies petitioner's site as "green area." Original residents of Kelly Lane have stated, through letters and at a community meeting, that they were promised by the original developer that this site would remain undeveloped. ~. a 3 h. Natural Features: Va Dept of Forestry reports that based on the tree species and heights and soil conditions, this site is not the best growing site for trees. Removing these trees and trying to replace them with landscape species would be very difficult. Undeveloped areas should be preserved with existing trees since these trees have adapted to the adverse conditions. TRAFFIC i. Street Capacities: 1986 ADT for Chaparral Drive between Route 419 and Penn Forest Blvd. (VA 697) was 10191 vehicles per day; between Penn Forest Blvd. and Beacon Drive (VA 1540) was 7462 vehicles per day: and between Beacon Drive and Poff Lane (VA 1578) was 6428 vehicles per day. Anticipated additional ADT is 94 trip ends per weekday and 84 trip ends per weekend day (1987 ITE Trip Generation). Between 1/87 and 2/88, there were 6 accidents on Chaparral Drive at or near the intersection of Penn Forest Blvd. 3 j. Circulation: Petitioner proposes one entrance into the site off of Kelly Lane, a private, dead-end road. The entrance leads directly into the underground parking area. No turn-around area for emergency vehicles or construction trucks and equipment exists nor is one proposed. 4 3 UTILITIES k. Water: Adequate source and distribution. 1. Sewer: Adequate treatment and transmission. DRAINAGE m. Basin: Murray Run n. Floodplain: None PUBLIC SERVICES o. Fire Protection: Fire service can be provided. Site must meet water supply standards for fire flow. Adequate access for emergency vehicles must be provided. Fire lanes (18' width) must be designated. Slope of site, proposed site layout, width of Kelly Lane, and lack of turn around area make access to this site difficult for emergency vehicles, especially ladder trucks. The building code requires enclosed parking areas greater than 10,000 square feet or at least fifty-percent underground to be sprinkled. Petitioner's proposed building qualifies under both conditions. p. Rescue: See "o" above. q. Parks and Recreation: No on-site recreation facilities are proposed. r. School: Estimated 8 school-age children generated by 16 two- and three-bedroom condominium units. TAX BASE s. -Land and Improvement Value: Unknown -Taxable Gross Sales/Year: Unknown -Total Employees: Unknown -Total revenue to the County/Year: Unknown ENVIRONMENT t. Air: u. Water: v. Soils: r„r. Noise: x. Signage: f r i.~~` ~ ~V ~ ~~ r f _' ~ a 4 6. PLAN CONSISTENCY This area is designated as Development. Petitioner's request is consistent with the Future Land Use Map and with the suggested densities for Planned Residential Developments. Request is also consistent with Development Policy D-1 (manage rate, location, and amount of new residential growth according to the capacity and availability of public services and facilities). 7. STAFF EVALUATION a. Strengths: (1) Request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designation. (2) b. Weaknesses: (1) Access to the site and circulation within the site, as proposed, is limited and difficult for emergency vehicles. (2) Site has been designated on an earlier (1981) final development plan as "green space." c. Proffero edgarease of the siteist`2 g Alleundergroundaparking areas undevel p shall be equipped with a sprinkler system. AUG 1 4 ' q~~ 1 1 PAGE.©~1 .w RE: J. Allison Associates 2 Acres Along Kelly Taane, S.W. Portion of Tax Pa~Cel 87.10-1--24 Hearing Aate: August 28, 1s9p ~'ROFFE~ CONDI'T'IONS The undersigned owner and contract purchaser of the above captioned property dv hereby proffer the following conditions as part of the application to amend the FUb ordinance affecting the subject property, as follows: 2" Existing tree cover cn the subject property shall remain an undeveloped areas of the site. 2. All underground parking areas shall be equipped with a sprinkler system. 1'he undersigned hereby submit these proffers as part of the subject application to amend the PUD, and shculd the application be approved, such proffers shall be a part of the amendment to the PUD affecting the subject property. These proffers sha11 be in ~.(~~, addition to, and not the replacement of, all proffers which were part of the ~~~ YJfi original petition. Dated: August 9, 1990 Petitioner: By owner: Narthview Corporation Vi F s" ent ~T ~~~ RE: J. Allison Associates Portion of 87.10-1-24 Proffered Conditions to Application to Amend PUD Applicant hereby proffers it shall construct in substantial conformity the improvements depicted on the concept plan submitted herewith by Berkley-Howell Associates, the same showing a single multi-family residential structure consisting of 16 condominium dwellings. All other site improvements, including landscaping, shall conform to Roanoke County ordinances and regulations. J. Allison Associates By . ~p~2Jk~ D e J A. arker 7- ~ - ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~~N.v ~ ~~~... i, ~ ~~ ~ ~~~ ~~ ~' ~~ f :~ ~~ ;, .~Itl _ - 3 = ~ \ ~ ,~ ~ , ,`,~ \ ,J~,, ,11' \ \ I •~~ \ w ~ . ' ~, `'~' ' ' ' •1 ~ 11 ~ 1 ' ~~ ~ ~ ' i 1 ,1~ ' it ~ , f v e 0'• ~ N / ~ i ~ ' i ~ ~i ' ~ . 1 ~; ~ 1 / 1 ' ~ 1 V ~1 . T 1 ~ ~ \ ~~ /; ~ /~ 1 I Q Q~ r~ I 1 1~ ` 1 / / i I; I K Z~ 1CI ~ l i l ' i C 1/ I i• 1 1. 1/ I ~ f-~ / `ti' a „ i 1 ' / / +~ 1~ ' / / I i ~ ~./ i /!/ I I / ~, ., ;, ~ ~ ~ ~~ ` + :: i = i 1~~ ~ ~ A N • >, r i `: ~ _ f ~ ~ '~ y ~~ w ~ j 4 . , ~:; :~ .,' i S > ; 1; i~ _ jl K ' ° \ ~.. ~, `' K . 1 , ~ ~ J _ ~ N w ~, _, Q o= N ~ M Z1 Q M ~ y ~[ O Q N G ~ . y w = t v .~~ + ~\ O Vj Q r C ~ \ N„ ~ O I' ao ~~ M ' w 4 Z ~ ~ • ~i ~1 ~ . ~i ~.4 ~i:! ~ 3.. • ~ s d ... r ',~;~ m 0 a a c 0 a ~M/ ~tf ; ..„.m //~~ .r.4 w~ ,~ ~ .~-~ ~~ ~.? ~, __ C~ Z 00 Z O Z O U a z_ D ~ W Z > ~ a . Q J W a Y O O ~ z J Q W C Q. Y. DC j~AW OFFICES OF GILBERT E. B~-ER+ `JR' P.O. Box 2152 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24009 n1; ~. iL7 ~, }~v ~,1 1 '' rr ,, .,. ^ C1 Ci,' 1 i~ ., ~ - - _ ~. _ ..i1C,"E= , .,fir'. _.=1~' _. I 7 _' !.J . 11'1 Z~ ~-.~ ~_- i ~. i i,. ~ .. i r'' ~~ (703) 344-8236 ~~ - ~ -- \ R - " ~ ~ 1 f L. T" I ~' i- ~ ~ <.". {~ 1. a . i- 'l "~.. _ }.-. - ~ i : 1 1. ~1 f .~ ' ~~ .- L ~~' 1 '., ! . , i rl ( ~ ( v ,. Y ,.. ~, C''. ~ C ' r ~ ( La 11~ l l~ !Z •_L ~ _. ~ _. ~ f. I _ JF Y 1~ '.. Y} "j k~ ~ k ~ _ (-? ~ ~ ~ F + . ~., .'1+±Z ~ 11~ _' II~A liI _~_ ~~ rtt F 1 :7 ~.1 '1 `'r~CJ {, .. 's i Zl S1 ~' ' . .. } ~ r , e ~ _ = _ .-~ ~~: , ~~ 7 , ~ .- ~ l `'~ r 1~ '~ ~ _ i ( , i a +, c ~ ~ } -I Y ` +, r~J t.:, J : T _ ~ ,,~~; ;i.- .{I _.1 {- 1 ~ 1 `1 ,. a _~ rt a 'r _ } 1f-t ~? ~iI~ ',l tc,t i 7 `.. '~ T ' ~. i ~ '~ tJ .. ,_. , . ~. T~ ~ :7 1~ ... _, 1 T .._. 9 sd- a STONEHENGE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION OF ROANOKE, INC. LETTER OF OPPOSITION REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF J. ALLISON ASSOCIATES 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111JJ ~JIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII ~~ - _ ~~~ _ ~~ EST .. ~s~~ PEARANCE REQU _ AP _ _ - - - - - - _ _ _ , , ,` . _ = AGENDA ITEM NO. ~ -- -- - - _ - - _ ~~ _ - - -_ SUBJECT - I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to - co nine me during the public hearing on the above matter = re g - WHEN CALLED TO THE PODI so that I may comment. _ - I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR _ - RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINE _ _ _ LISTED BELOW. _ • aker will be iven between three to five minutes to comment - Each spe g = -_ whether speaking as an individual or representative. 1'he chairman will _ decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, _ the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to c and will enforce = do otherwise. • S eakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Ques- - lions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. _ c • mments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized ,,. All co -' speaker and audience members is not allowed. c= c __ • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. _ ,. • S eakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments p with the clerk. c __ • :~iNDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT '" THEM. i __ ASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO DEPUTY CLER PLE _ --- ~, ~ ."~, NAME ~'~ ~ _ ~ ~ .. , , ,- ... _ ~ ~ r . 9 - ! C_1_l ADDRESS ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~r , ~ / ,, .~ p~~---~-~ PHONE ' `~ ~ - IIIIIIIIIIIII I I I IIIIIIIIIillllllllllllilllllllillllilllllilllilllllllllllllllllllliilllllllllillll mlllllllilllllllilllilllllll iniiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii~i~~ ~iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiniii _ _ - ARAN CE REQUEST = APPS _ - _ - _ - _ - _ _ ~. _ - ~ ~~ - - AGENDA ITEM NO. - _ _ _ - SUBJECT ~''~~~'` l~`=- - __ _ - I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to -_ _ reco nine me during the public hearing on the above matter c g _ WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, so that I may comment. _ I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FORT _ _ -' RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINE _ _ - _ _ - LISTED BELOW. • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment __ whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, =_ rce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to and will enfo c do otherwise. _ • S eakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Ques- "" hpons of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. -_ 11 comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized • A c "" speaker and audience members is not allowed. _ c __ • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. • S eakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments __ p with the clerk. __ __ • INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT _ - _ - THEM. __ - LEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO DEPUTY CLER _ - P _ - '~' NAME ~~~ . '~ , U. o ' ADDRESS ' 5" _ = 2 - ~6b6 • PHONE ~ i .~ ""~""' ~ I""I' ~ I' ~' ~""""""""""I"' I ~ ~' I"' I"~""' I"~' ~""' ~""~"""~""~'I ~' I"~"' m .. . . . . .. . . . ... .. . . . . ~ t ~- ~ STONEHENGE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION OF ROp,NOKE, INC. LETTER OF OPPOSITION REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF J. ALLISON ASSOCIATES ~~~ttorneys at Law -_3~9az•aooo ecooier 703.982 •8524 HAND DELIVERED '0 Franklin Road. S.E. host Office Box 1018 Roanoke. Virginia 24005 Terrance Harrington, SecCommission Roanoke County Planning Roanoke County Administration Center, Room 600 3738 Brambleton Avenue, S. W. Roanoke, Virginia 24018-0798 RE: Application o Existing PUD Roanoke) as i less, located f J. Allison Asso formerlto Ruxton Stonehenge ( Y the of for more or t pertains to a 2.0 acre parcel, on Kelly Lane Dear Mr. Harrington: On behalf of the Stoneheigte res dential Atownhousen development ("Stonehenge ), a 175 un we write in located on Chaparral Drive in RoanokJ• Allison Associates to opposition to the application filed by amend the existing PUD for Stonehenge to permit the construction of a 16 unit condominium. The property which is the subject of the application is to acrosslthe stree tdfrom the 83 Stonehenge community, immediately residents on Kelly Lane. HISTORY AND NATURE OF STONEHENGE of the development of Stonehenge (formerly known as The history and complicated, but must be Ruxton of Roanoke) is long discussed in order to understand the Stonehenge residents' opposition to the pending application. lication for rezoning of the property comprising The original app. Stonehenge for development as a PUD was filed roved a the final In May, 1975, the Board of Supervisors app development plan .for Ruxton ed of townhousesY,e condominiumsn and 290 residential units compri garden apartments in three (3) phases. However, in December, the Board of Supervisors approved an amendment to Phase I 1975, roved for of the PUD from 96d garden apartments and ul2ttownhouses to 65 constructio GENTRY ~OCKE RAKES & MQ~RE August 3, 1990 GENTRY LOCKE RAKES & U1C3DRE Terrance Harrington, Secretary August 3, 1990 Page -2- condominiums, reducing the total number of approved units from 290 to 235. Richard Hamlett as president of Northview In April, 1y79- ro erty, requested an amendment Corporation, the owner of the p P roved for to Phase III 1 lon d Ke11yr Lane from ethe woest oside tpop the east construction a g Mr. Hamlett submitted a side of the street. At that time, a copy of which is Revised Development Plan for Phase Ithe proposed location of attached hereto as Exhibit A, showing Lane on the 22 townhouses and designating the area across Kelly which J. Allison Associates proposes to construct a 16 unit „ The Board of Supervisors approved condominium as green area . the amendment, and Mr. Hamlett built the 22 townhouses in accordance with the Rev undevelopedpopen p ce since 1980,across Kelly Lane has remained As is evidenced by the 48 letters attached hereto as Exhibit B, of which were written by the original owners of townhouses many urchasers that the on Kelly Lane, Mr. Hamlett represented to P Lane, of which the undeveloped land on the other side of Kell lication is a part, property which is the subject of this aPP would never be developed, wssociation when a 1, f t he common conveyed to the Homeowners A urchasers areas in the community were complete. The origurchasing their relied upon Mr. Hamlett's representations in P has Mr. homes, and are now shocked to discover tha after having been Hamlett refused to convey the property repeatedly asked, but that he never intended to do so and now ears later intends that the property be developed in a some ten y neighborhood. manner totally inconsistent with the surrounding utation among its residents and the Stonehenge enjoys a rep eaceful and attractive neighborhood community at large as a p Further within a heavily developed area of Roanoke County act that development within Stoneh of lifelof the tonehenge residents. reputation and the quality lication for amendment of Richard Hamlett submitted with his app the PUD the Revised Developme as Plreenfarea"e and we believetit subject property was designed g of the should remain undeveloped. It should not be the policy every Planning Commission or the Board of Supervisors a d dallowPng the parcel of developable land in Roanoke County, developer to construct a sets doalndangerous hand en nfortunate established neighborhood GENTRY LOCKE RAKES & u1QORE Terrance Harrington, August 3, 1990 Page -3- Secretary precedent. Accordingly, the residents of Stonehenge ask that the members of the Planning Commission recommend denial of the application in order tO dentseare proud to call St nehenge. community which its rest OTHER CONCERNS In addition to the foregoing, the residents of Stonehenge oppose the application for the following reasons: 1, Lan___d UG~ ComaatibilitY. e residents, a In its letter of July 13 to Stoneheng J. copy of which is attached herstates thatlb t 'could Allison Associates incorrectly develop the property now without further permission as a townhouse development While we believe that this statement was made in error as a result of the complicated history of the development of Stonehenge and not as an attempt to mislead, it is nevertheless the case that in order to construct condom iri ums nor units, whether they are townhouses, royal of otherwise, the applicant must obtain the app the Board of Supervisors for an amendment to the existing PUD. The fact that only 227 of the 235 approved units were actually constructed does not here that the remaining 8 units may be constructed anyw especially where the proposed area of within the PUD, reen area construction is designated on the PUD as g and not for development. According to the 1985 Comprehensive Developm natedlas for Roanoke County, Stonehenge has been desig Such an within a "Development" land use category. area is one which has "withsca ac ty id ndetermsmeof pressures" and is "nearing P according to additional growth". Additional growth, the plan, should be controlled and stabilized•olicies the "Development" designation, the following p are of particular applicability to the matter at hand: D-1 relates to residential growth as it a, Policy ublic concerns the capacity and availabirovalofof the services and facilities. APP application would indicate a trend by the GENTRY LOCKE RAKES & MQ~RE Terrance Harrington, Secretary August 3, 1990 Page -4- Planning Commission or Board ofdevelopment s and allow continued high density accompanying demand on public services and facilities in an area which has experienced significant growth in recent years. D-3 indicates the County's concern with b. Policy en space and woodland areas the retention of op whenever possible. Stonehenge is aThe sproposed development in a wooded setting. condominium would eliminexists cin thet mi ddledof acreage which currently It should be noted the Stonehenge community. royal of that the initial application for app development as a PUD filed in 1974 stated that "the wooded slopes on the site should, if possible, be retained for environmental reasons". c, Policy D-8 concerns the desire that All ofsthe be compatible with its Laneo arelntownhouses with buildings along Kelly the exception of the condominiums in Kim Court at the mouth of Kelly Lane which are imperceptible to the majority of the other residents on Kelly Lane. The development of a condominium in this particular area is not compexiste along the townhouses which cu Lane.ly opposite side of Kelly 2, Floodinct and Drainage Problems. The residents along Kelly Lane currently experience water runoff and drainage problems as a result °Lanee slope and grade of the area acroser~y ° on a Chaparral In addition, the Craighead prop which ad'oins the Kelly Lane property at the Drive, 7 rear of the townhouses, experiences significant wa er runoff problems. At its meeting with the resident licantrstatednthatvit of Stonehenge on July 31, the app has not yet specifically designed the s additional retention system for the proposed use. Any development of the property as proposed will increase GENTRY LOCKE RAKES & MQDRE Terrance Harrington, Secretary August 3, 1990 Page -5- 3. robability of drainage and erosion control the P Lane. problems along Kelly ^^ _ _._a Safet Kelly Lane has one entrance onto Chf om 16 feetetoa22 is very narrow, with widths ranging stops. There is feet. At its end, Kelly Lane simply no circle or area in which to turn around. The existing inadequate minimal travel lane width coupled with the increase in traunit c ndomi iumc w 11 ucause and occupancy of a 16 of the creates a justifiable concern for the stabconstruction road and its ability to withstand use by residents ment and for the safety of the existing equip there is inadequate along Kelly Lane. In addit eri y vehicles providing turn around area for emergLane residents, the need emergency services to Kelly lication is f or which will increase uestionableapwhether there approved. Also, it is q exists significant s ig at a dra lan Drive tf oor m current Kelly Lane along Ch p residents, not to mentioadditionale residents ri n the egress resulting from proposed condominium. Traffic along Chaparral Drive betwee nlficantlyn since Virginia Route 419 h to lthe a Roanoke County Police 1984, According inia State Police, 8 accidents Department and the Virg occurred along the section of Chaparral Drive 1990r Kelly Lane from July 1, 1989, to July 1, Fortunately, there were no fatalities or reported but that possibility exists due to the injuries, an already heavily traveled increase in traffic along Woods secondary highway. The construction of Ivy across Chaparral Drive has served to further exacerbate the problem. It should be noted that while Kelly Lane is still Northview Corporation, it has failed to owned by which has been adequately maintain the road, maintained by the Homeowners Association for the last ten (10) years. Additionally, Northview Corporation GENTRY LOCKE RAKES & MC30RE Terrance Harrington, Secretary August 3, 1990 Page -6- has failed to pay the real estate tax on the property since 1980. 4. The Roanoke Valle Condominium Market. In its letter of application, J. Allison Associates proposes to build and sell luxury condominium units to satisfy what it perceives is a substantial market for es ecially among retired individuals. condominiums, p with the residents on July 31, However, at the meeting the applicant stated that it has not cond~oP o ed formal marketing analysis for the p We believe that the applicant's market condominium. ertains to the analysis is flawed, at least as it p Roanoke area. The current mar ari fO n CO,ecentnlyearsn Roanoke is extremely soft, developers have °iall sti Recent developments such condominiums substant y Hills and The Glen are as Chateau Monte at Hunting Strongly suggesting that experiencing sluggish sales, the market for luxury condominiums is saturated. 5, ualit of Life Concerns. attribute is its peaceful Stonehenge s primary The group of 22 atmosphere and wooded Lari ing s in effect a small townhouses along Kelly art of the neighborhood in and of itself. Atthshares pno common larger Stonehenge community, a as Kelly Lane roadway with the remainder of areal Drive. It does, intersects directly with Chap ro osed however, share the wooded slope on which the p P condominium is to be construct~od osed condom nium ois along Londonderry Lane. The p P incompatible with the design of the existing townhouses, and does not relate well to of townhousesa community consisting almost exclusively ro ect Allowing a developer to constre tabl shed mneighborhood in the middle of an older, is neither desirable nlann ng Commission or thecBoard which we believe the P of Supervisors should set. The residents are also justifiably concerned about the potential decrease in property values and/or the GENTRY LOCKE RAKES & MOpRE Terrance Harrington, Secretary August 3, 1990 Page -7- act on marketability of existing negative in-P townhouses in the event a condominium istownhouses~ e built in an area entirely surrounded by 6 , Surrounulii ~~ --~ - - - Alonct Chaparral Drive. The general area surrounding Stonehenge is developed with single family and multi-family residential and p, very limited amount of recreational uses. undeveloped woodland remains. We are aware °Chaearral previous applications for developmenthe PlanningPStaff Drive which have been consiCommission and/or the Board and denied by the Planning of Supervisors. Conceres lminimal 1 sightSe distances along Chaparral Driv and excessive density in a highly developed are all of inadequate turnaround for emergency vehicles, which factors exist with regard to the pending application. ~, Experience of the Applicant. with the residents on July 31, Jane At the meeting ro ect Allison Parker stated a d has no trackr record in such of the type proposed et been developments. J. Allison Assocbiu~ eishproported to be organized as a for orationltythe stockholders of which organized as a Corp will be Ms. Parker and an indiviau are concernedf that York. The residents of Stoneheng Ms. Parker's inexperience in the construction and e of project proposed will development of the tyP ualit of the Stonehenge adversely impact the q Lane specifically. community generally, and Kelly SUMMARY They The residents of Stonehenge are proud and were in this instaned also take to heart the word of others, led to believe that the area designated~~ seen tarea"ewould Development Plan of Phase III Stonehenge as g remain undeveloped and t nand Northviewe Corpor tionHom It novas Association by Mr. Hamlet Kelly understood by the original purchasers of townhouses along GENTRY LOCKE RAKES & MODRE Terrance Harrington, Secretary August 3, 1990 Page -8- Staff and members of the Planning Commission Lane, the Planning and Board of Supervisors that the ar~oa riatee as a green areaor development but rather was deemed aPP P contrary to Development of the property at this time is not only the representations made by Mr. Hamlett and the designationm act its use as an undeveloped area, but will also negatiMrlYHamlett the quality of life of the residentsand weonrespectfully request should be made to keep his word, Commission recommend denial of that the members of the Planning the application to the Board of Supervisors. , GMPjr/ccm cc: Mr. Lewis C. Smith, Jr., President Stonehenge Homeowners Association of Roanoke, Inc. bcc: Douglas Glen /200/09766-001/Oil.ltr E7~iIBIT A ` tt ~ ~ ~ ! t ~.~f ,T i ~~ , i r ~~ _ N ~ ..l' , \ r~ r~ ~~ ,/' 1 ,~5, h \J 4 ~it1 '.Y ~ ~ ~ ~~ f 1 ~ i ~i~~ t l ~ •r~ c ~ a. i y Lp'~~+t '1S V` t ~ \ I ~ 1~f, +•r i ' ' ~ ' +~t Y L t.= ' t ~~'/ C 4 ~ i ~\~~\ tJ~. CC i ~. Z` `i \ \ , ' S~ ~ _~ QI i l\\ j~ ~ ~~\~ j. ~. .,.~., ` 1~ ~ .i Y ~1~ ~~ ~\ \>~ / l ~I ~ ~ ~i ~r J' \~. ~ _~=~ i :i 4 \~ C1 __'- :0 1 U urn ~• y TI r,~ - _~ '--- __ 1 e ~ O A a.~..;1 i $ `i \ J ~.r . - S ;'t~ j'=N 1 " it ,, ~ - w ~ ~... .C• ~n is ....^ :~ 1 ~ I - ,~ ~ ,,~: _ 1. J r _ _ ~~ ~4z ~~t ~ / ~~ i r jEt :~ / N ~ ,~ ~ ft ~ Q .h ~ _ ~ ~ • .: • = .~- e `: ,.... ., t Q ~ era j3 • . 7~ ~ i s 't ~ a ~~ ~'"A, Q -/tee) %- Ii ~ / 1 ~ 7~ ~ i 1 , ,`i .:. • 3t p ~~ ~ Q V fµ Z 4 s ~ ~ Cx-I ~ t ~ ~,, o > 5 t i s ~ .it's p ;~o Z ~ m ~ ; ~ tt/'' ~,'~'' - s E'~E~7- E ~ e0= L~~ErJ- OD j et ri O = * t ~F: < ~~~ ~ 101 ; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~= a t f a' ~ ` _ _ ~ ~ ! 7 ~~ - 13 UUU i~E>t ~• =i=s 9i1t~ ~ ~b >,~ _ - t r r_ i - s t s s a i a- ~ t O t ' ~ ~ ~ R ~ ~ iii { i i - } } t t i ~ ` { Y ~ ~ t : - : t I • - - T - y ~+ `^ i a e s ~ - ~ ' w ~~. ~``-~ jY!}:`• ice:, r~i a , ~at .r, ~,+y ~v ~ ~ ~ n ~ \ ~ ^` •, ~. ~:%-. g~iIBIT B 3359 Kelly Lane S.W. Roanoke, Va. 24018 July 22, 1990 Roanoke County Planning Commission/ Roanoke County Board of Supervisors 3738 Brambleton Ave. S.W. Roanoke, Va. 24015 Gentlemen: We purchased our town house on Kelly Lane in 1980. We are the original owners, and still reside there. When we purchased this unit, we specifically asked Mr. Hamlett, of Norview Corporation, if any units were to be built across the truction on KellydLanet soewe proceeded be any other cons with our building plans. Early in the summer of the year we moved in, Mrs. Gray, at the request of Mr. Hamlett, met with your Plan- ning Commission, requesting that no buildings be allowed on the upper part of Stonehenge overlooking our homes on Kelly Lane. The reasons she gave, at Mr. Hamlett's urging, stressed the potential of flooding problems. She also mentioned to you the desire of the residents, in view of Mr. Hamlett's promise that the beauty of the area would not be altered by other cnnstruction, not to look at the back sides or garages of other buildings. Some of Kelly Lane is narrower than other parts. We feel that this could pose a further problem, even a poten- tial hazard, acdionaoftcondominiumseorrtownhousesdonyKelly future constru Lane. Yours very truly, ~~ ~i ~ ~~Cf~--` ~~~ ~~ ~ ,~,,~i~,'`~~'" ~ i~~~G\~ Carl M. Gray June Hunt Gray Roanokes 1`lumber One Real Estate Company July 16, 1990 Mrs. Carl Gray S.W. 3359 Kelly Lane, Roanoke, VA 24018 Dear June: ars ago when we were hone conversation Friday, y e from Kenny Graham we altered As we discussed in our p land in Stoneheng purchasing the remaining e, At that time we requested a final development plan of Stoneheng lans and explain the effect the orig residents to share our p meeting of existing they would have on the community. roceeded to at that meeting uninvited and p roblems we would Richard Hamlett showed uP frighten the existing residents with drainage run-of p Lane side of the hillside as a result of our altered create on the Kelly plans. a number of residents, Carl During the course r concerneda th t thelrview they had from the front of being one, were Ve Y affected by the rear of townhouses that would rest deal of conversation their homes could be harshly be built above it. I do recall there was a g about not wanting to destroy that view. ecif ically being a part of that While I do notlrecall Richard Hamlett sp street to do recall it was apparent that residents who expressed conversation, would be built acrof~o~ conversations their concern believed nothing felt that way art. interrupt that view. I would assume tan assumption on my p with Richard Hamlet, but that is only ~urs very truly, & COMPANY, REALTORS ~goone President /nms J Main Office ~ Rt. 419 3922 Electric Road. S.W. P O. Box 8614, Roanoke. VA 24014 (703)989-0863 460 East Office Hollins Office 3548 Orange Ave. ~ .= ,; 24022 7507 Williamsa^~ ad~ P.O Box 11963. P=" ~~~° P.O. Box 19704. Roanoke. VA 24019 (703) 343-5800 (703) 366-2401 ~;A 2 5 ,990 _.. ~ ~ ~ ~ , n x _ i'... Planning Commission Board of Supervisors 3738 Brambleton Ave. Roanoke, VA 24018 Dear Sirs, July 23, 1990 Lane roposed condominium complex to be built on Kelly The P Being an original owner, I was under the disturbs me greatly. imuression that nothing would be it self to this constructionstree This land does not seem to lend five feet e roblems. The additional traffic worries me without drainag P The street is very narrow, because of my small child. envy vehicles are not able to as I have seen on a short of regulation, and any emerg request. We now turn around and Pleaseareconsideretherzoning that few occasions. live on a quiet safe street and I would love to see it s ay way. Sincerely, ~u,C,.1dc., ~ • ~~J~c.~ Linda S. Andrews 3387 Kelly Lane Roanoke, VA 24018 c.c. F & W Management Co• ~.. S-. V \ `, ^ ~~ a \~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~\- ,J f P ~ ~ ~ ~' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~, ~ ~~ ` C L r ~~ r ~~ ~~` ~ ~ ~_ ~ ~ ~ , ~- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ S ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ., ~ ~~ ~ ~ `~ ~~ ~ ~ l• " +-~ ; i ~ ~ ~ ~~ ' ~ ~ ~ -. a L ~~ t ~~ M ~' a ,a t \_`~ 1 1 ~~ 11 G V S 7 ~ T s rr,, . / ~ i J V ~ ~, <-. - -5 ) 'C lS J ~ ~.S r. N j- ~ ~ l_~ 1 ' ~. J " -t C ~ d ~, -Y-, ~ ~ c ~' TJ U N ~ J ~ u . t ~' ~ ~' ~ G P ~' 3 _. Ci J CS~ ~ W ~ r W c~ < ~ ~~ c ~~~ N` P- A O ~"~ So~R~ B~'~.NK July 23, 1990 Roanoke County Planning Commission Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Rae J. Haas ~ ~ ice President Gentlemen: As owners of a Condomini e are hEMPHATICALLYdOPPOSED3to Kelly Lane in Stonehenge, ro osed to be built on the New Condominium Complex. p P Kelly Lane. We purchased our Townhome when tion wo u dlbe doneg8n the were assured that nOleaving the natural and landscaped now proposed area, beauty to enhance the aesthetic and material value o our property. we have had this Townhome forWeafenally without success. Ironically, terested prospective buyer who has now upon hearing of the proposed construction. In addition, the more direct and general problems ,r traffic congestion, drainage difficulties, etc. that are sure to occur if this conSero rlpropertylvaldue and Se~is ously and unfairly decrea marketability. Thank you for your attention to this matter. S insa~'~ 1~ ~~ Rae J Haas Marvin E. Haas Rae J. Haas several years had a very in- lost interest Sovran Bank, V•-a• Post Office Bos 14111 ~ Roanoke, ~'i~ginia ?~~>'-'"111 Telephone %03 ~ 985 ~ '~~~~~~ a.; ~y°c ~~~ ~'m~n~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~d ~Y~1 ~~~ ,~ ~ .ui ~~ `L~. ~~ ~ `feu; ~'~~"- w~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 7 ~ v~i~ ~~ ~~ . ~; ~_ ;' /' ~''~~~ , /1~1,r,~-iu~'L /~ (.,-~ iv, ' ~ A N o/ `~--• tit" , ."V`~~ ~~~ ~ ~~% ~ !~ ~\~~ ..Gtr cz~ , ~,c'-c~ ~-, ~~ ~ ~z ,•\ ~ ~~„-~ ~~-~~.~ ~ `G~ ~.~ L ~~~~ ~, ~ ~ ~ L 11-0-f .--k. ~t ~ r ~~ ~ ~~~ L ~'" ' ~-- v/JvL C/-> r GU ~- V ~~ ~` ~- Robert W. Edmonds, M. ~-~ Norfolk and Western Railway Company Medical Director l Medical Department ~\J Roanoke, Virginia 24042 /~ ~--~ D~-z-T/ Rt~ r ~1 \Y~~7rs. \Y~'Zargarei eJJ. ~owden 3349 ~"JLellz~ ~ane //J~~ a , ~Jl.oano~e, ~ ~ irginia 24018 ,1 /C G'-r~-n~ .~~ ~~G~~ t7 ~~ cc.^ cY G~-r''~ O t~Qv,. 2-~.c-w C / ~ y C7~,-. G-Y L C C/Y~ ,~/ ~ L77'1,.2 G ^~, L' il'1 e~/ G'-. I ~ ~ y -~ ~~ 1 .C ~I~.t X71 °M~a, , -a-~•_' `l~ij~', t~ ~r j t C% ~, c "' CyJ 2L 2 4.! G~~ ~' GCYI ~~ t L.n ~~:.-~ C`~~'s-n...EC, ~~~,~ CCLc-7 L' ~C"~~a-~- % . Gu /~ ~-.~ C. -C~y v,., f, .~ [J Cv.~~ /! G7'/7 i ic-~ lI ~`~ ~ L-~tC~ C~• ~'-V CZirt ~ ~ r//7 ~'~ C.LC ~G~+ <~ [.~u.J ~?~ ~ ~.~ UGC -~ G^~, d , .y% C~ Z Ct~-„ ~-~r .cam 4 ~ c~ -mac. C ~ .z-~ f' /t- c ~-G.-~zr..-~ 3 , .7!~ c !/~ i C: /~ G'~7 ~ ~ i~ a G.~: l,zc=c~ y k/"~'' C ~ C'r..- ~~'Lu ~~~ CZ~t Q~.ti C ~ -~' / ~J ~' ~'~f ~L ~ \ Y"U~~ 1'\ f: C~,l't.~~-(~?_ ~ ti 4~V.. Yl.l- 'l J C"L- ~~'1'~- ~~~~L` 'v--~-- LG lam.' ~~ ~,,~ LCD '= ~-~-~~ :1 -k~ct~~`ri'L "SC"E c_,L~,~'l ~J l..~l~~- l,l,~~l.'J~ ~ttiL -. ~ 1 i. n ~ ~ti~~ ~r_c1 e.~;,.~.~c~ C~'~. ~.UCLti~ ~~~~~~_ ~ ~~ ~y ~^~ ~v ~ ~ ~ ,~ /~ ~ ,.~~~vu-~~-,/ rte,/~,.~~~,~ :~Gc- L ~ , yL~ ~ J / ~, / ~~~~ /"~Z~~jTyc.(i7~crC.f.Gm~ , c.. :~ ~``~ ,~ ~/ ,- 3 i -~ GU ~.c~c.~~~ •~~ vrc~ ~( /~j..~ ..~~ ~ ~ --' i C~ `~ ~~ ~~~ ~ ~i { (W U ~ ~ ~ QQ ~yf~'~ f ~ ~~~ "~ , ~-at-~ ~~ wi cC2 / G -~ , ~ -~~~~c_ // 7', Y ~ rli-sz~~ ~' ~L~T c~-~E-~ ~[ 3"~;1~ ~~~'r_' l'Zci1~~ v ~ ~ ~~ ~ .tip- ~ ~ ~~' ~~~-~-~ ~~ ,~ ~` ~, ~r' 1` `'_"`" ~`~`" ~~- C (3ERpLDINE P. CHNAS 3393 LONDONDERRY LANE ROgNOKE, VA. 24018 Alice J. Callison 3389 Kelly Lane SW Roanoke, VA 24018 July 20, 1990 Roanoke County Planning Commission Terrance Harrington, Secretary p,p, Box 298024018 Roanoke, VA Dear Sir: fanned ress my opposition to the p I would like to exp the 2 acre tract of land urchased my townhouse (1979) condominium to SW.COWhenultPd on the on Kelly Lane, the owner and builder, Lane would never be bui t I was told by Richard Hamlett, land on the soutdidlnotogetethis Promise in writing. on. I regret I 5 feet short of the regulation Kelly Lane is a narrow ( does not lend itself toof street width) dead end street and aratus - therefore causing a hazard in the event fire aPP a fire. o raphy of this land e°offnthelhilllhaslalwaysn The top 5 the drainag type of constrroblem. been a major p the added very congested now and with Chaparral Drive is roblem. traffic it would be a major P reciate it ert owner, I would aPP and r_he As an original prop y ,,..hi„ ?nd ,.rderst~. t'~- ~ ' a^ th°Y°'"'~ constructed. • ~ would st;:dy ..~.., p..~.. is yy you condominium problems that will incur if this Sincerely, ~~-~~~ ~~c~~ Alice J. Callison July 18, 1990 Roanoke County Planning Commission/Roanoke County Board of Supervisors TO• FROM: Billie K. Louthian, resident Kelly Lane (original owner) While I'm certain the condominium that is planned to be built by Lane will be a luxurious one, I certainly J. Allison Associates on Kelly estion, traffic, noise, drainage problems and erosion oppose adding more cong of land on this narrow little lane. o0 on the street More people also mean more pets which mean more dog p P and more paw prints on cars. It also means more teenagers and children with no place to play. o I believed the sales pitch "nothing ears ag G not buildable; all you'll It saddens me that nine y will be built across from you because the land i-- I was told I would ever see will be birds, trees turning in Fall, etc." ht on Kelly Lane. have the privacy of the home I sold if I boug widow who sold her family's home to buy At that time, I was a young and and townhome. My property has decreased in va ue a maintenance-free Y aid was too high. already as the price I P ro erty value will decrease further because If this condo is built, P P and privacy -- the very thing Kelly Lane will loose its unique been~Ymy last dollar on. gave up my original home for and sp I feel exploited. It does not concern me that someone is out to make a few dollars; but it grieves me to find out someone would be dishonest about lt~ rincipal of What about ethics? To me ethics includes truthfulness, a P ood with moral duty. And what is moral? A philosophy conduct that is g behavior. of right and wrong Lane Not only is the very idea of building more dwellings on Kelly unethical, it is destructive to the environment. "So what?" say the greedy. Sincerely, Billie K. Louthian p,S, Please, do not let these people destroy our land and homes and peace of mind. •. { ~ ~ ,, , i - Home 703-774-289 -~~ - ~ -- ~..•- -~-- ~ , i ; Service 703-772-1198 BETTY A. SPRAKER ~ ~.: 3375 Kelly Lane „~~ _': +~ i~~~? ;,a> a,,,,, Roanoke, VA 24018 - ' ; > i ~ _ ~. _ ,~~ "t..i-~ ~~~Y ~ ~ r, ~f - ~ , - /l // _ ~~ / _. - ~ ,c- / ~ /~ ' ~ t i ~, ~~~ -~1 y~ ~ cif'- ~ - •=-r ., ~ ~ L ~ ~. ~.~. ~ ._ _ ~ ' . ~ / ~ ~ . i ~ ~ ~' - J -~= .- ~, ~; - V - ' (_ G t f `. L '.lt~ ~ .~ '~ ~ ~ _. ~• L~~~r~, ~~'~~~~ _ -- -_ J' x' / ~. C'L~-~~- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~' --" .... - - <~ L~-a-~ ~ ~ 4 I ~Y ~ ~ ~~ • ~~~ i ~co ~~~~ ~~~~ (~~~ c~~ ~ ~~o~ r ~-~_~ ~ ~~ LV iJ ~- ~~ v~-C~ ~ `~ ~ rY~ Vv ~ ~-~- ~- ~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ya~~- ;~- ~Y~G 1J~-Y,, L ~~~ c s5 -.. ~ ~~ ~ `~ ~~o ~~ C~,~~~~s ~~ ~ ~~~ ~~~~ ~2~ ~~~~ ~ ~- ~ w ~~ ~. ~~ . ~ ~ ~~~ ob~~ ~ C<< - ~ ~~~ 1---~` c~ `~~- ~~S ~ ~ C~~~ L~ t~~ S =~. ~`~ a cc~ r ~ ~-t~ ~OC~~ ~~~~`~ ~~E~ L~tiz ~~~~- ~ ~~~ a~~ \ r1~~~Ct, ~c~: __ ~... __. _ ~-~~~~ ~~_ ~~~~ 1 - - - --- - --~-- ~ any ~ C~ G Lv G~-~=Y _!-~ __ ~ ~ _~.~ -- _ ~ ~~ _~ ~ C L`~u=L ~`-A~ - __ __ __ _._ ,~ ~.. - ~~ ___--- - ~a.~-~-~ `~ ~ _ ~ CS-Y~, L~J~1~-~''l~'~ ~ ``tir.~ L~ ~~-G U~-~- --~ ~~ ~ ~-~~ ~~~~ __ _.__ .. __ ~ ____ -- ~~ __ ' ~ ~~u~~ ___ __ truce ~~ ~ ~~~. - -- ~?~ ~,'t-'-~' --- '~~~su~-' ~ ~~~~~- ~- .~ Roanoke County Planning Commission 23JUL'Y1550 Roanoke County E3oard of Supervisors Roanoke, Virginia Gentlemen: I am ~-iistressed to learn of the rezoning request before you regarding 'the property along Kelly Lane described as "two acres of remaining acreage of Section l,Phase III Ruxton of Roanoke". I am an original purchaser of the property at 33x5 Kelly Lane and have occupied it since November 1575. I am the first resident of Kelly Lane since my house was first ready for occupancy. When contracting to purchase and custom the negotiable features of the house, I was concerned about the steep hill in front of that house and the probable use, Richard Namlett,as builder told me then that because of the steepness of the terrain it would be unsuitable fvr building and that because of this it should be anticipated as wooded area for 'the future. I believed him then and think it valid today. h1y ten years of residency has shown two additional problems will likely arise. That is water and drainage and compounded traffic problems. The current graded bank required about five years and numerous land slides before we could stabilize. I would anticipate the new grading with a more severe slope to present even a greater problem. I sincerely hope you will reject this rezoning r~equest. S~yncerely, / /• 2~ d i~i~~4 ~ Willis Jackson 3379 Kelly Ln.SW Roanoke , Va . ~4C)18 John J. Engel, M. D. John D. French, M. D. John B. LaFave, M. D. 15 Cleveland Ave ~~ay MEDI(`q~ ~~ O '1~ S a v • L~. JP y~RTINSVILI'~ CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER, LTD. Martinsville, Virginia 24115-5351 (703) 632-9714 P. O. Box 5351 July 25th, 1990 Robert E. Rider, M. D. David W. Seamon, M. D. 1-800-277-9714 of Supervisors ~~ ~ ~ ~' ~'' -~ ~- ~ ~~ ` Roanoke County Board ~ _ -~ p. 0. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 'l~ 2 .~ ~~~ Re• Proposed Condominium Lanelex " - • to be built on Kelly -. ~,~ L°..! Dear Sirs, y I also own being rented by a family I live in and ownnaetoWhichsisocurrentlyerr Cour ehen e Complex, a townhouse on Stonehe g with an option to buy. .Both units are withTno osedScondominium complex and as an owner, I am concerned about the p P to be built on Kelly Lane. lex since it will increase I am concerned about the proposed comp act upon the Homeowners Association Kelly Lane has only one egress and traffic in the area. It would also imp he lane will increase risk of fires dues structure and maintenance fees. therefore, further housing on t ingress, hting• and the difficulty of fire fig ro osed complex will require extensive ear roblems. With the The location of the p P e and with removal, which will further crbuilt near thelengrance to Sto~hisnwill two new condominiums recently Lane, er to children getting on the bus the proposed condominium complex to be built on Kel y hts. increase traffic congestion, increase dang o and from school, and may require the installation of traffic lig reciate your consideration of these concerns and to go t I would app lex to be In summary, ro osed new condominium comp objections when presented with the p P built on Kelly Lane. Sincerely, ,' r ;~ Lc~ 1~- John D. French, M• D• JDF/11 l ~~~ ~fC'~U~LC1 L, ~Lt77~ L~E?.C~ ~fC'Cf:?000'~ ~~S Ct ~~.F_1CLCEac.L to . 1~, -~, ,~-b~ C,,ae ~rl C~c~c c nc um G~ ~ k, ~ IaE ~~u:i_:~ ~"w K~,C~,j L a~xa . ~u~ `~-C-i~rn,lti.c~vu~., Gam-, .,Q,618-Ecs ~-G~ ~-ZG~-~'~Cr~( Cl,'zCr~ C~,tc~c[ G7~ ~ GnCzG- ,g~,~ ~,~ 1~ ~-e-t,~ ~c.l' u,2C f ~-~ ~ ~ ~-l ~. V ~~ u.~ a_a G1~-~ ~6 9~~2c~~.1-~-- l~'~~ '~ awl c~~~-~c~ ~2~z.Q ~ ~-~- ~(~-C~,~,~ 1,, ~. ~ C~ ~ G1.~ QJYt- CtZ (~l~l[Q-C cnt~'2~c~- Ll' l_.) ~'12C,~ ~~' ~Li_Al~ C~ C,Cr6-C,CL~~ ~~'2' ~;~ ~,L~LQY~ ~ ~ (~2C~2 ~,L~~~~~ ~u ~uu~ ~ zc~~ ~ ~C-~1~~2(!Q~ i ~'Yl~li~l~t~~~l~ ~c~. ~3c~s ~anr~~v~ Roanoke County Planning Commission Roanoke County To Whom it May Concern: A few years ago when we decided to relocate in the Roanoke Valley, we searched theWencouldacallfhomeheithcalgreat dealgof pride.~Weofound likely a place this place which is called Stonehenge. Stonehenge is a place of beautiful and friendly neighbors who co- operate with one another through the organization called the Stonehenge Homeowners Association. This organization does an outstanding job of maintaining the homes, and the best landscaping in the valley. It certainly is a comfort to us to have the knowledge that our neighbors care about the beauty and value of our homes, which brings us to the subject of a project that is now being proposed in our immediate vicinity. We object to any new construction which would not enhance the appearance of the neighborhood. At the present time traffic conditions out in tYris section ate rapidly becoming a safety hazard. We ask you to please prevent this section of our con¢nunity from becoming less than something we could be proud of on Kelly Lane. It's very possible our property would become much less valuable, and would not hold its resale value. Sincerely, John C. Compton, Jr. /~~~ ,~. GeorgeniaL~ompton ~~~e lc c ~~- ~ct~,~ v~ ~ c~,vr scz~ ~ u,'~Cl ~~~,~ CZ, ~QJ1 c`~1~1~-P (/~~^rnV Q V ~GU ~JY1~ - ~jVl,~ywc~~ L~2~ ~Ck 4~2 k~~ ~~-~ , -, C~Z'z~ ~n~~ ,~L~- ~~.~.~ X0.221-~«ye. ~J~~ rL~~ y~~~~ J/ e~r~e~~-l~ ~~.~12 C~2-e~~ cvel ~~z.~t~, ~ Qi{C~~ ~~~~ ~~~ ,~e~~z~z~ ~~~c~ ~~xe~- ~ G~~(~~~2 Y~< 2,~q~,/~,~~/~~,~//~ ~~: GI~GC~C~7 , ~l/l Ld`~ ~"~? ~`~'"/ / ,,1U ~ ~A~ i ~ /i $~G,r~ ski Itil ~~ ~ ~~ ~~~~ ~~. ~1,7C,,Z ~'G L L ,~'tz ~~u u, , ~u,.~, ~. ~ _ . ~~~~; ~S ~~~~ ~~ ~~~ ~~~-~- ~ ~ ~o~. ~~ ~~~~ G'~~-~G"~"-t' P h~ ~`~"~`~ 3ras co~ao..d ~,y~e-~ ~.,.-,e, Pik z/c~~ ,~-~^"~ Gee u~Ne d %itm-a2e.v~~ ~'~4~ "°"," ~` ~~ ~ eu~. ~y~ ~, ~. ~. a ~~ Z x~ ~,~~ ~~ ~ 3. -0' ' ~~~°' ~~s~~~. ~~~~ ~ ~~ 3 °~ ~"`~/, ,may ~'~~-,~ "' ~~ ~99~ /~1 .~~~ ~~ %' ~ ~ i ~ ~~~/c~ " _ ~~ y -~ _ -- ~~, _ _ __.____. - - __f~- - __ '~ ,.~ ~~` -~ - `~ _ - -- - -~ !'-- `/ ~~~ L~ - --.. ... _ __ / t_~-o,- cl-~'-~~'1't-~ - .(~~yu Cam ~~ r~-~~•'1^---~~ ~`!-~1~~..~G~v ~/~ _ .- ~- q _ ~/7 ~ ~ / ~ i'~ItiJc_.ti~..~ .... ` ~ ~ ~ 1 / ~~ Lx . tom' -- -- / ~ / ~t~ ~ . "_~ ~ D~._ .. _ ~c~_ `~ / "'_ '1~~c/9Q 355 ~+~NV~•.rr~ir~~ ~~HP 5'tg1 ~b A ~v ~t ~~ v7 ~e/~ C~NN~ ~°~~~ e 7~t~fPvv ~ s~.+S G{~~lr~~K WY1~'~ ~p Hr~~ YoK A~~ /o r' ~~ ~ P~~ c~~~ ~ vav~ f~r~ v,~~wFS~ ~/ ~ ~~ -~- ,J ,f i6 - ~,ti. ~ f / yV ti ~ Q~ ~~e W Cv ~. 5 / r N r / i~ o ~.~c J ~ 4~ VVn i LN ~ II ~ / s„~~~w~g•~ ~~ a~ ~/c ~ r4 ~~ 1~r. ,~ ~ 5 / -~ / ~; ur w~~rd ~P q~gp~~v~-wf ,~~r,7 ~ I ~ l e ~ ~~ ~ ~ •1 v ~ r v h/P ,t~rj ~ Ise ~I Q//i ~ C f~ K*q~ w, H ot~r~ A ~i~rr }~ e ~ I'S~ dP ~i C~PRr~L~-- ~S u / i~ r1~A~~ rr _..._-- 1 ~ Qh ~ ~ Ty' y~"~ C~~ t; ~rr~ ~~u~ ~ - ~%C ~3~~ ~~~~d'~y ~~~ s~~ ~Q~~ ~ ~ . ~~{D/~ ~~a.,~c.~~,~~~i ~u~ ECG ~ P Gt" ~.~ur (~il~~~~~ ~ ~ ~'~'~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ex~.da ,~ic~ ~~~p~~il .~~ ~ ~~ ~ `~ ~ .z`~ ~ ~ . ~~ . a-n [mil ,~cvr~I~ ~i-t~ °~ -'~~~~ ~ U~~i~ e-~ ~cc~,e~r~~ ~~ls C~ ~~ ~~ ~ K.-~-Q-e ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~QaD ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ F~~~ -~ ~~~' cue ~~~1~ ~v .~r~-~ w~ ~~~ `~'~`~~, HRS. ~~cua.K~ '~• BOSSHART 3404 STONEHENGE S9VARE ROAIyOKE. VIRG1NIa. 24018 r ~ ~ ~~ (.__~.~.y--~ ~~ > _ ~x _ \~ ~2 Q , `~`~-~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ -~ -F---- ~ ~~ _ \ ~ ~` c^~~ . ~~` ~~. „~~ ,~ c~ ~~~ ~ J G >~ ~-=+:•' l 1 y/ ~/~ ~ ~~= _ ~~ ~ ~ ~~x~ ~ ~ ~~ G2 ~' ~~~~ ~ -~-~ ~ ~ `~ ~~~~ v .~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ a~~ - - ~ ~-~ ~ ~~~~ / ~ ti ~ ~~~~~~. G~'~~ u. ~~~ ~ ~ ~~ s u'~ ~~~~ O ~ ~9 155a ~... ~--~,~ a~ ~,p C.lc. a ~~ emu. ~~ ~ ~ `, ~~< ~~ ~ / ,. ~~ ~~ ~ ._~a..~.~,~-Lc, ~ ~ / ~- ~-~- roc- -rx-c-~< < ~._ ~/ I o`er t-~ / ~.~rc.- -K-L ~`-~ :~ --- ~ / ~~-~ _l Cf1~-7L "/ LL-G ~ GL' r~~ .~t.C'~ ~ / i ~~ ~~~~ ~ <.~ --r ~ L-~:-a d~G/ ~1.~,171.L1~G LL. / J ~ ~~ ~/-~ .-/~ :LLB :::~% '-~,c ~~ `«cti -~,G ~G Gc- _4~1 ~~ .tom/''-''"" (~~• ~Lt ,G,~j ..G~-".h c c ~, ~ ~.e~-a7 " ~-ct--a~~ ~ "'~~`z_ ' ~- ~ ~Gv-a - ~~~.- ./~~ ~~ /• r~ i L.'G~c ~c_ <<,~~_ /~t L' < 3 1-LGc L' fti' f~ ~L.-.(.~- 2/G~=yt~.~i ~lL' ~~~« C~ •- ~-_ - - ~ tr- r _ - i, c2---rte, ~ ,LC- ~.-- ~ L -~ (. V Z ~ (.mss'- z ~lL. ,L L_ -~ ~c:: !C: ~ G !L ~~c-~ _ c:f~_ ~ ~~ ~ < <JL. '~ ~ ~~ C~-'I- /.~L.,~_G~--~-L''?z L t ~ _..1-. ~ ~~ ~~ G, ~-=- . ~~~1-l~ ~-ce-.~ <fr~. / ~' 3221 LONDONDERRY LANE ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24018 i ~j, '~c~..,-G r1.~ LG~J ~. 1. ~ ~ .lam'-' ~-~'~`-`.--`-1~ ~. ~/ ~ Ci/ ~ ~ L ~L -~ A ~~ ~ - ~~~ ' v ,.`.~~C/,~ ~~ L.~.:-t_• , / / to si '~'~(~./~w~t~n~ It ~`-' iK t L ~- .~ l' ~ / i ~~ % '~ ~ ~J~ / ~ ~ / ' ,, ~ ~ ~+r ~~ . J , ~. ;; ~ ~~ "k LLQ. ~~~~ ~~ ~~•~ ~, _ ~~° , , ~ ~.12;t; S .~' „ . ~ ~~~ ~ ., J i/ ~! r, n /; ~~~~ Ij \ ~ \ l.~~ it ~~~ \~y ;• ,~ij~ ~ 0~,~'lrtn/~~ ' } ~ (~° (Y.~ lam, C.~ /_~-' ~t~ ~ r ~ . ~~ ~, y' ~ ' ~ . ~_ L C, `CAL=~! I ~ - ~ ~ ~ 1 r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~^,~ ro-.,.., ,~~ X%'•~ a..r L ~Z~ ~:.ss' ~` G Yv~. ~ `~ ~c Lt~ Z:<• ~ ~ 'rte--y :,~ )'Y ti./~<.~~.N i ~ J ~! ~ i ~ ~..t,~,,.. ~ ~i=-~-.,, fil _ C.,k cam;.-~r.ti.,.,~i"'1-yvi .<v~i ~ /ltX V ~ ~.~-(~ i -~-ti- c 0 ~~ G~'~ 'n-o-- ~' ~ ~ cam.-~~ ~ 1 - ~,~, • d~^- .~- x~.-. ~--- - ~ ~''''~`4 ~ L : ve (Y x . :1 _4~ 020, /~90 %~'~/~ ~r ;~,,~ `~ '' ~~ ~, ii`'T/~~• ~~) ~j i ~ ~ "ii1 ~i" ;~ e -~~ ,,-,may ~/ -. ~ f ~_` r ~`G~~f / ~ f,~ ~' r, -' ~~ f ~~L~ ~~~ L ~~ 1, ~ ~ , ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~. ~ fro / ~ ~~ ',~~ / `` _ ~~ .:..~~, r a+~ '' 7 j 9 ~~ ' ~O ~ i~ _~ i ~ /i~~'" tl'~~3'Gcf / G-^ ~/ ,' ~ ~ =~y ~ ~ ~,, y~~'"~ '' ~ ~ Ly-_~ , ~~ r `~~ . r-- -- ,-~ ~2~y~ .~`'~'`' lr /`~~~~ ~ - f` ,mfr/_FI ;'%= ~"~ , ~~~~ ~~ . /tom ~, /./~~Lti,w~ ,~ ~ ~ _~2~,~'Y~"" ~. ,, f . .,% , ( ~ ~. i L `~~.. {i~~y! . - ,i v~// ~ ~:~ iii//~^;%.J i~ Y V 7 ~~---'~' 7/ '' `s/~ ` 'L ~ / L ~ ~r fv~~~~ y~ ~ ~ /~~'`0r~ ~ /"' ~•.j _ 10 ~,..' /?esnm fce C~_ f'loh~~~L9 / ~~oa.~ol~~ G'o ,Qao~`~l o~ 5~~~~i~.~mr s_ VO ~ ~ 1 l `,~ c~ i ~~ - ,~~.2 ~ .Sf o ~7 cf1 ~1 ~ e- ~g 9 _-- /~ ¢-' / i ' G r-~ 1. j _ 17 ~ ~.-a ~L fit' ~ ~ ! L - v /- G~ /'1 S f ~/,b ~. C° r7 ~ t'r y c f -fie, s/~ilc~ra/ly -- _ / - - c Mary E. Hinman ,.,,,, 3318 Stonehenge Square, SW Roanoke, VA 24018 July 20, 1990 Roanoke County Planning Commission Roanoke County Board of Supervisors 3738 Brambleton Avenue Roanoke, VA 24018 Gentlemen: I understand that J. Allison Associates of Moneta, Virginia has filed a petition with the Roanoke County Planning Commission, requesting permission to construct a sixteen (16) unit building condominium on property between Kelly Lane and Londonderry Lane. Asa resident of Stonehenge, I am very much opposed to this construction, due to the following reasons: 1. The increase of traffic on Chaparral Drive, which is already very busy, especially from Route 419, Penn Forrest Boulevard, and the entrances to Stonehenge and Kelly Lane. The entrances to Ivy Wood Apartments across from the Stonehenge entrance causes additional problems of speed and people making U-turns. 2. This building would cause severe water drainage problems for residents on Kelly Lane, and sewer drainage is also a problem in this area. 3. Many construction companies work late into the evening or all night, on weekends including Sundays. We would have to put up with the noise, not to mention the dirt and trash which always comes from any construction site. 4. This would destroy a beautiful wooded area which we all enjoy. 5. The building would completely divide the Stonehenge complex, with the residents on Londonderry Lane having to look down on the building. The wooded area would be much nicer to see. 6. I question any parking problems it would create, for emergency vehicles getting in and out especially the fire trucks. Thank you for your time and consideration of this matter. Sincerely, Mary E. Hinman Robert B. St.Lawrence 3407 Londonderry Court ~,.r Roanoke, VA. 24018 July 20,1990 Roanoke County Planning Commission 3738 Brambleton Avenue Roanoke, VA. 24018 Dear Sirs: Please accept this asum complexatosbetbuiltnonrKellynLanethe proposed 16 unit condomini If the members of the Planning Commission have not visited this site, I urge that you do so and see firsthand the devastation that will be wrought if such a complex is builurposesaTheslovely beautiful hillside that serves other importasteep hillside protect trees and other growth on this unusually winds and heavy other residences aroundrotectrtheserresidentsnfrom water damage. rains and snows. They p ou will see that with the When you take a look at this hillside, y water removal of most of the trees and other growth inbehbuilta,we all erosion will be uncontroll db sect water~atolother areas. And given know that these walls only the steepness of this hillside~Soon wthe homesites directbycacross this hillside for very long. from the proposed condominium complex ~~ill begreach otherrhomes serious water damage and will more than likely on or near Kim Court and Chaparal Drive. ~•lhen this happens, past experience shows that irate homeowners will seeking advise from c~~ill be having "their day in court". their attorneys and everybody I am As one ~~ho recently retired to the Roanoke valley, impressed with how littlee even th ugh Southwest Roan ke isnfilled growth has taken place her with subdivisions of sinalhopeomand aprayerl that ~thehoPlanning condominiums. It is my Commission caill CO health and welfare of tus all de of a better environment for the S' cerely t Robert B. St.L rence ~i~ _.~ _ __ _ __- ___~1.~-~_.____ _ -~...~ .__._.._._.__~ - n ~ _ _o __ --- ~~~~~~G) b oti _._._- _.__ ___ - .~_- ...~..____-_ _ .__. ~..~.~__~...___ o _ ~ .._ ~~~ -.-------_.___ ~~ 2 =E'_ itJ. _--_. __ __v ..__. __ __ __ __.__ __ ___ .~ __ .~. _-_.-__- ~__~ ___ _. __ ~~ ~. ___ _______ .._ _.._~_. w_.__ ~- s_____,._._ ._ __ ___ _____._ _.__- _~~ - _~G ~iV ~~ ~._ ----°---- - ----_ -_ ~L_ ____ __. ....._~..___~._~-..__ BRIGI'IT 1 ___.__.__ PRODUCTS INC _ _ _ __ . __ RIGHT CREST ITD. P.O. Box 14000, Roanoke, Va. 24022 703-982-1300 .. - ..... _. _.. tr ... JOHN A. BRIGHT ~ ____ _ . _ _ _. _. . Chairman/CEO ~ Office - Factory -Warehouse 907 4th St., S.E., Roanoke, Va. 24013 American Made Products July 20, 1990 Roanoke County Planning Commission Roanoke County Board of Supervisors 3738 Brambleton Avenue, S. W. Roanoke, Virginia 24018 Re: Proposed Condominium Complex on Kelly Lane Gentlemen: I object to development of the acreage parcels between Kelly and Londonderry Lanes for the following reasons: 1. Drainage problems created by increased water runoff - the steepness of the area to be developed should cause more erosion and drainage problems for those residents between the development area and Chaparral Drive; 2. Increased traffic congestion on an already heavily travelled road, Chaparral Drive and the nearness to a very busy intersection at Chaparral and Route 419; and, 3. Decreased safety for students at school also on Chaparral - many students increasing the amount of traffic as well increased amount of traffic from various units (apartments and condominiums) all Chaparral Drive. a nearby high drive as the multi-family opening onto ry truly ours,, -~ ~ . ~~w c is M Belvin ~jZ c~~- ~~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~~~ ~ --~- ~~/-~~~ -' ~/t ,~~ ~~ ~ ~' ~ ~ ~-r ~~ ~ - .~-~ ~`-~_-~.-~~''`~' ~~ ~ -;~~f.-~---~ - 3462 Londonderry Court Roanoke, VA 24018 Roanoke County Planning Commission Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Sirs I stongly object to the sixteen-unit condominium building being considered for development along Kelly Lane. I believe this will cause drainage problems, and certainly, further development will increase traffic safety hazards and increase traffic congestion. The proposed construction will most certainly ruin the very reason I chose to make my home in Stonehenge. I invite all of you to visit my home at the end of Londonderry ~.aurt. t.n ac~mi re the VlP_WS rolling hills and vallevs i~o the south and east, Roanoke City to the north, (magnificent at night!), seven layers of glorious mountains to the northwest, and lovely woodlands to the west and southwest. Cool, green in summer; tall stark sentinels in winter. btlease. Do not vote to destroy the beauty that is Stonehenge. Thank you for your consideration. 7 G~~~ Ernestine'' unny' Hancock July 20, 1090 Roanoke County Planning Commission/ Roanoke County Board of Supervisors 3738 Brambleton Rvenue Roanoke, Va. Subject: Proposed New Condominium Complex to be built on Kelley Lane Gentlemen: Rs the owner of a condominium, located at 3406 Stonehenge Square, I am against the building of the proposed new project. Traffic problems in the area are already bad enough. We do not need to add anything which will cause more congestion. We already have drainage problems and this can only add to the draining aTid washing problems. I am also concerned about more traffic causing problems . I bought a unit in Stonehenge because of the convenience to town and work area and ease of access but during the last few years things have changed drastically in the area. I appreciate any consideration you will give to my letter. Very Truly Yoursjj~~ Harry F. alton,Jr. ~llL y 20, / 990 l0: ?0~1NOKC COONly % Lr4NNZNG COlrII~ZSSZON and ?0~9NOKC COUNl y Q0~12~ v,L SU%C2 VZS02S Su6~CCi : l ?0~ OSC~ N~UI CON~OI~ZNZl1~1 C0~1~ LCX %0 6~ 6UZL l ON KCL L y L ~N~, ZN l flC CCN l C? Of l f!~ S% ON~fI~NGC COI %LCX l~~f12 SUl ~2VZS02S and % Lr9NNC?S, We ~ee.L veal atavng.Lc~ that the pnvpv~ed cvndom~ni.um~ ahvu.Ld nvt be cvnatrcucted. Oun main nea~vn ~vn ~fee.L~ng th~a wac~ ~~ the vend bad daa~na~e p~cvb.Lem which wvu.Ld be put vn the new cvndvmzn~um vwnert~ and the pneaent hvme- vwnena vn Ke.L.I~ Lane. yvun en~.~neen~ ahvu.Ld ~.tud~ the a~nh~ng nvadwat~ ~n ~nvnt o~ 3535 Lvndvndenn~ Lane, the ~ma.C.L cave which exi.at~ 6eh~nd and dvwn the bank ~avm 353! LvndvndeaR~ Lane, and the act that bank behind vua tvwnhvuae has washed out at .~ea~t ~vun ti.me~ ~n the pant ~i.x ~eaa~. r9Lav cvntn~but~n~ tv .~aa~en amvunt~ v~ waters ~.Lvod~n~ dvwn the hi..L.l between KeL.L~ Lane and Lvnde~cnc~ Lane ~a the act that at .Leapt 20 .La2~e taeea wene b.Lvwn dvwn dun~ng huna~cane f!llGO .Last faL.L. Ule tnuat that c~ou w~.L.L nvt appnvve th~.z pno~ect because tv dv ~v wvu.Ld be aneat ~n~u~t~ce tv the bu~ena why wvu.Ld be ~hvwn theme cvndvm~n~uma on dad dace vn.L~. A.L~y, a.L.L v~ the hvme vwnea~ ~n Stv;cehense,~wvuLd have tv bean the cvnai.de~ab.Le expense to pavtect vun ne~ghboa~ on Ke.L.L~ Lane ~nvm the add~t~vna.L heavy nun o~~. ,S~nceae.L~ ~uvua~ ^ L ~~ & Cd C.L.Lruovd 3539 Lvndvndenn~ Lane 2vanvhe, Ua, 20/8 ~ ~'_ ~ ~ ~ ,_,. ..~ -~ t% 3324 Stonehenge Square Roanoke, Virginia 24018 July 19, 1990 Roanoke County Planning Commission Roanoke County Board of Supervisors 3738 Brambleton Avenue, SW Roanoke, Virginia 24018 Ladies and Gentlemen: We have learned that J. Allison Associates of Moneta, Virginia, is seeking permission to build a 16 unit-condominium on Kelly Lane in the Stonehenge townhome community. We object to any more building in Stonehenge. We already experience traffic problems and have a 14-miles-per-hour speed limit posted and are considering speed bumps. There would also be potential for drainage problems in the area. We feel we now have a lovely landscaped development including the trees in the area now being considered for development and don't want to lose it. I believe we now have 175 units in the area and that's enough. We urge you not to grant approval for construction of this building. Sincerely //%~ ~,~~~ Marx Leach~~'-~c~/ ~5~%Z~~ Diane Leach ? '~ ~ _. ,.,. ~'- ~llL Z ~ ~ ~ July 19, 1990 Roanoke County Planning Commission .~r9AN,~GEI'~E~1T Roanoke County Board of Supervisors 3738 Brambleton Ave. Roanoke, Virginia Dear Commission and Supervisors; I would like to express my objections to a proposed zoning change that would allow for the construction of a 16 unit condominum along Kelly Lane for the following reasons: 1. Increased population density above the current approved level. 2. Increased traffic on both private and public streets. 3. Enviormental strain that could cause severe drainage problems. 4. Condominiums are over buildt and are currently vacant. A need does not exist for new townhouses or condominiums in this area. 5. Potential devaluation of current properties. Your vote against this proposed zoning change will be appreciated. Sincerely, Winton c. Harris, Jr. 3435 Londonderry Ct. Roanoke, Virginia 24018 1 r. i~~~`~ i i~ 1.7~ ~ i~ .#1 iY~ NAGE~ENT ~~Np, O ° i 1~i9~'a ~~~~ - ~ ~/-G~% ;~ ` ~ i~ 1 ,; 4 ~4V / ~~ l /~ ~~- w1/ I ' V f A~ 4 1 ~j/~ / ` /~ / - ~~ t ~ / -~, J - / 'tea ~"""~J h-- ~, ~' ~---~ ~~ ` ~ ~..~ r ~~ -~- -~-m__ ____ ~~. fib. ,~ ~ ~: '+. 0 ~°~-~ `~ r" •~~~ ~o ~ ~,~ ~ ,~ ,.~ Roanoke County Planning Commission Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Gentlemen, I am opposed to the proposed construction of a 16-unit condominium by J. Allison Associates on Kelly Lane. My opposition is due to increased traffic on Chapparal; drainage problems in that area; fire and rescue access onto Kelly; and water and sewer service capability in the area. I also feel a pleasant natural setting currently in Stonehenge would be detrimentally affected by the planned building which is so incompatible with the surrounding homes. Thank you for your consideration of this letter. Re ar s, ~ o i ~ its 3433 Londonderry Court SW Roanoke, VA 24018 7-iai~~ ~ ~~hr1bers ~ kl~. ~o,~uoke. you-~-Y Pla.nn.~~ C.orrn,w,.~sSt~+J ~ ~. ~n~U~, co~7 3o~ae~ ~.~ SU~s~ A M W~~~ - Ste- ~o w~a,ke. r now N v~,,v~ ~`~~e-~-~t~ -~ ~ `~-. ~e v cs to rt ~-Q fie., ~u.~c~e,n~- ~ t ~o-~ ~ ~cD ~n~k ~.e,Uelc~tm~rt) -~~ ~(~ ~ c~.,c~.e,s ~ ~,~ ~~~( l,,,ou~e c~.~hiu, Inds been t^e~ ~as~ed b~. S ~,tSon ~''~O1 0!.S;a e ~ ale s . 1 lam. rest ~ ~-1 i s -~ c.ha,n~e -~~ P• ~i. ~ ~ . t rcNn ~-ac~nl~ot~5 ~o ,q wu~,l ~ i- S~ar~e y C~nd-4 rvt.t.n 1,l.ur~. 1. feet a-I~-i.< ~. l,~ - ~p . cn~.~~ Shot~,~ ~c~~ be. c~,~~~,ue~ -~c~ ~e,~e~~ t m.~ar reasavi s ; ~k~. ~o~nc~.~,n ~.~ cdp wt.Q,n,~- wou.t ~ncJ~~ ~l~-. ~o P U.IQ,f~oy~ de1S~~Y ~cX~ ~-i~ot,n --~ni~. c~c~c~rme~ Ux~ . ''~'1~.c.s i~~l S cal, ~ ~C~t~Q ~ i~ ~" ~~~'-~'iC ~ (,(1C1~.~Q/,~-c, u,l ~~~~~ ~` ~i~'e. r~5k, ~ ~(~:AR~1.92 %~ .~.ts~ln~-~au.,n~ ~.bCP,~,25. Ti~.ts vsa~ des-~c~~-n -~I,v~, ~~uo~ c~n~cnc~.c,~ ~-~ ~tc~, s-f~+e ~~ n C_c/YYI,~ , -kc~.. ~ w~nti+5s ~d~ ~oA~ i ~ s~.c~r.~re ~ ~ ~'~ aU~ ~'~~ ~ '•~l~A'e~~ ~.~1-tom to -~C~. CC.~t~~ ~~~ ~~~~ ~ ,/ u~. V W ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ P. (s~ ~ r . ~, ~~ . ~ e.~ ~~~ ~~~~~ c~ ~ Rd~~o~ , Ua a~o~~ July 23, 1990 Roanoke County Planning Commission Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Dear Sir: With regards to the upcoming hearing for a condominium to be built on Kelly Lane. As an owner in the Stonehenge community, I strongly object to such a project. I feel the area is congested enough with the 175 units in Stonehenge and the units in Stonehenge Condos on Kelly Lane. Also, the proposed site can only cause drainage and erosion problems to those that already exist. Please vote this proposal down, thank you. Sincerely, Roberta Harmon 3317 Stonehenge Square Roanoke, VA 24018 E~QiIBIT C t ,' . AI.LI SGN ASSOC' I A :~ES ~ trout e 4 , Bo>: 121 Moneta, Virginia 24121 July 13, 1990 Stonehenge Homeowners Asr~ociation of Roanoke c/o F & W Management Corporation P . U . box 20f~09 Roanoke. VA 24018 Uear Neighbor: We are in the process of purchasing two (2) acres along Kelly Lane. As you may know, the current Planned Unit Development specifies the property shall be developed with more townhouses, like the ones adjoining the property. We desire to amend the PUD so that a six' condominium can be built, similar to the plan Condominium, which includes a basement garage In order to do this, we have filed a petition The Planning Commission will hear this matter the Board of Supervisors on August 28. teen (16) unit of Stonehenge and an elevator. with the County. on August 7 and Our reason for this amendment request is that we believe building a condominium building will better satisfy the demand for luxury one (1) floor living with covered garages, eliminating on street parking, especially among retired people. g~~ent~oned we could develop the oroperty now without_further permission as a townhouse development. We fee our proposed condominium will fit in the nesghborhood in terms of quality, style and price. Enclosed are a site plan and elevation drawing of the proposed development. You see from these drawings the development will be attractive and well designed. We are committing to this site plan and elevation, so then will be a conditional part of the requested amendment to the PUD. We would like you to attend a meeting on July 31 at 7:OOPM at Trust Bank Savings, 4415 Electric Road, Roanoke, VA. so you can see the full sized site plan and elevations and hear our proposals; and so we can answer your questions and address your concerns. We hope you can attend this meeting. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please feel free to call me at any time at (703) 721-3504. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, J. ALLISON ASSOC~TES By : /~ Attachment ,,Y.A. arker ~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD p'TUESDAYOASEPTEMBERT25ADM990STRATION CENTER, ORDINANCE 92590=1? AUTHORIZING A USE-NOT- PROVIDED-FOR PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT A MICROWAVE TOWER LOCATED AT 5673 AIRPORT ROAD IN THE HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT UPON THE APPLICATION OF DOMINION BANRSHARES WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on August 28, 1990, and the second reading and public hearing was held September 25, 1990; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on September 4, 1990; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That a use-not-provided-for permit for a certain tract of real estate containing 8.461 acres, as described herein, and located at 5673 Airport Road, (Tax Map Number 38.14-1-4) in the Hollins Magisterial District, is hereby authorized. This permit approves the construction of a microwave tower subject to the conditions contained in the application and supporting documents. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of Dominion Bankshares Corporation. 3. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: BEGINNING at an old pipe on the northeasterly side of Airport Road (25 feet from the center) at the extreme southerly corner of property of Blue Ridge Memorial Gardens (DB 700, Page 105); thence with the southerly line of said tract N. 68 deg. 15' 50" E. 150.16 feet to an old pipe; thence with the northeasterly line of the Blue Ridge Memorial Gardens property and the line of M. T. Fidler property N. 88 deg. 20' 14" W. 120.09 feet to an old pin on line of property of Blue Ridge Memorial Gardens; then with line of same N. 68 deg. 24' 14" E. 151.29 feet to an old pipe; thence N 38 degs. 14' 41" W. 104.36 feet to an old iron pin corner to property of Blue Ridge Memorial Gardens; thence still with line of same N. 68 deg. 25' 12" E. 470.04 feet to an old pin; thence with a new division line through the Patrick property S. 31 deg. 44' 27" E. 478.20 feet to an iron pin; thence with another new line through the Patrick property and 50' distance from and parallel to the line of C&P Telephone Company property (DB 1011, Page 217) S. 52 deg. 45' W. 661.42 feet to an iron pin; thence with the arc of a circle to the right whose radius is 25.00 feet, whose chord is N. 82 deg. 40' 45" W. 35.90 feet, an arc distance of 38.90 feet to a point on the northeasterly side of Airport Road (25 feet from the center); thence with line of same N. 38 deg. 06' 30" W. 434.95 feet to the BEGINNING and containing 8.461 acres and being as shown on map made by T. P. Parker & Son, Engineers and Surveyors, dated January 23, 1979. 4. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. On substitute motion of Supervisor Nickens to approve use as requested with understanding that documents from FAA be a part of the permit and attest to no problems with height of tower, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES• Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: ~~ ~,.,~ Brenda J. Ho ton, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Development & Inspections Terry Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning John Willey, Director, Real .Estate Assessment 99' o-'f AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 25, 1990 ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING A USE-NOT-PROVIDED-FOR PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT A MICROWAVE TOWER LOCATED AT 5673 AIRPORT ROAD IN THE HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT UPON THE APPLICATION OF DOMINION BANKSHARES WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on August 28, 1990, and the second reading and public hearing was held September 25, 1990; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on September 4, 1990; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That a use-not-provided-for permit for a certain tract of real estate containing 8.461 acres, as described herein, and located at 5673 Airport Road, (Tax Map Number 38.14-1-4) in the Hollins Magisterial District, is hereby authorized. This permit approves the construction of a microwave tower subject to the conditions contained in the application and supporting documents. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of Dominion Bankshares Corporation. 3. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: BEGINNING at an old pipe on the northeasterly side of Airport Road (25 feet from the center) at the extreme southerly corner of property of Blue Ridge Memorial Gardens (DB 700, Page 105); thence with the southerly line of said tract N. 68 deg. 15' 50" E. 150.16 feet to an old pipe; thence with the northeasterly line of the Blue Ridge Memorial Gardens property 9ga`I and the line of M. T. Fidler property N. 88 deg. 20' 14" W. 120.09 feet to an old pin on line of property of Blue Ridge Memorial Gardens; then with line of same N. 68 deg. 24' 14" E. 151.29 feet to an old pipe; thence N 38 degs. 14' 41" W. 104.36 feet to an old iron pin corner to property of Blue Ridge Memorial Gardens; thence still with line of same N. 68 deg. 25' 12" E. 470.04 feet to an old pin; thence with a new division line through the Patrick property S. 31 deg. 44' 27" E. 478.20 feet to an iron pin; thence with another new line through the Patrick property and 50' distance from and parallel to the line of C&P Telephone Company property (DB 1011, Page 217) S. 52 deg. 45' W. 661.42 feet to an iron pin; thence with the arc of a circle to the right whose radius is 25.00 feet, whose chord is N. 82 deg. 40' 45" W. 35.90 feet, an arc distance of 38.90 feet to a point on the northeasterly side of Airport Road (25 feet from the center) ; thence with line of same N. 38 deg. 06' 30" W. 434.95 feet to the BEGINNING and containing 8.461 acres and being as shown on map made by T. P. Parker & Son, Engineers and Surveyors, dated January 23, 1979. 4. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. q9o-y PETITIONER: DOMINION BANRSHARES CASE NUMBER: 27-9/90 Planning Commission Hearing Date: September 4, 1990 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: September 25, 1990 A. REQUEST Petition of Dominion Bankshares Corp. for a Use Not Provided For Permit to construct a microwave tower, located at 5673 Airport Road, Hollins Magisterial District. B. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION There was no opposition to the request. C. SIGNIFICANT IMPACT FACTORS None. D. PROFFERED CONDITIONS None. E. COMMISSIONERS MOTION, VOTE AND REASON Mr. Winstead moved to approve the request for a 50 foot tower. The motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Winstead, Witt, Robinson, Gordon NAYS: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: Massey Mr. Massey said that he would be abstaining from discussion and vote on the request due to a potential conflict of interest. F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE None. G. ATTACHMENTS: ~ Concept Plan I~ Vicinity Map Staff Report Other Terrance arring on, Secretary Roanoke ounty lanning Commission ,~ "` ~:,~ STAFF REPORT CASE NUMBER: 27-9/90 REVIEWED HY: Janet Scheid 1. NATURE OF REQUEST PETITIONER: Dominion Bankshares DATE: September 4, 1990 a. Petitioner has applied for a "Use Not Provided for Permit" to construct a 50 to 60 foot microwave tower on this 8.6 acre tract of land. Petitioner currently has almost 50,000 square feet of ofifice space on this site housing the Dominion Bankshares credit card operation. b. Petitioner proposes to erect one or more 4 foot round dishes on this tower to facilitate communications between Dominion Bankshares Regional Operations Center on Peters Creek Road and this site. c. The proposed tower would be located approximately 2600 feet east of the Roanoke Regional Airport. Ms. Jacqueline Shuck, Executive Director of the Roanoke Regional Airport was notified of this petition. She has no objections to the tower as long as it does not exceed 50 feet. d. Attached concept plan and zoning vicinity map describe the project more fully. 2. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS a. Federal Aviation Administration tFAA) approval for this project was granted on July 19, 1990 from the FAA office in Jamaica New York. This approval was based on a "Notice of Proposed Construction" application submitted by Dominion Bankshares. This application was for a 50 foot Structure. The FAA has stated that if a structure higher than 5G feet is to be constructed, further FAA evaluation will be needed. b. FAA approval is necessary before a building permit will be issued. c. Building plans must be submitted and certified by a Virginia registered professional engineer. d. Site plan review and approval will be required. prior to building permit issuance, to ensure compliance with all County requirements. 3. SITE CHARACTERISTICS a. Topography: The site is gently rolling and sloped towards Airport Road. 1 `~~y~. b. Ground Cover: Predominantly grass, asphalt and mature landscaping. 4. AREA CHARACTERISTICS a. Future Growth Priority: Situated within the Peters Creek Community Planning Area. This area is designated for stimulated growth. The site is served by urban services. b. General area: Developed with a combination of general office, commercial, and light industrial (warehousing) uses. 5. LAND USE IMPACT ASSESSMENT Rating: Rate each factor according to the impact of the proposed action. Use a scale of 1 through 5. 1 = positive impact, 2 = negligible impact, 3 = manageable impact, 4 = disruptive impact, 5 = severe impact, and N/A = not applicable. RATING FACTOR COMMENTS LAND USE COMPATIBILITY 3 a. Comprehensive Plan: 1965 Comprehensive Development Plan has placed this area within a Development land use category. Office uses are of moderate compatibility in this category. 3 b. Surrounding Land: Property abuts Blue Ridge Memorial Gardens and existing office, commercial, and multi-family residential uses. As mentioned above, this site is in close proximity to the RoanoK.e Regional Airport. Petitioner, in the letter of application, states that a complete engineering analyses has been done and shows that no harmful interference will be caused to other properties or microwave systems. This engineering analyses has not been reviewed by staff. 3 c. Neighboring Area: Primarily general office with assorted commercial and light industrial uses along Airport Road. Both single and multi-family residential uses are located just east of this site. 2 d. Site Layout: Petitioner proposes to wild a 50 to 60 foot microwave tower, to support one or more 4 foot round dishes, on a 3' x 3" concrete base. e. Architecture: N/A 3 f . Screening and Landscape: iNi i 1 be reGuir-ed per Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance. 2 }~~ ~~~ s g. Amenities: N/A 3 h. Natural Features: The site is well screened by a natural buffer of mature trees and undergrowth along both the northwest and southeastern property lines. TRAFFIC i. Street Capacities: N/A ~. Circulation: N/A UTILITIES k . 'Water: N/A 1. Sewer: N/A DRAINAGE m. Basin: N/A n. Floodplain: N/A PUBLIC SERVICES 2 0. Fire Protection: Within established service standard. 2 p. Rescue: Within established service standard. Q. Parks and Recreation: N/A r. School: N/A TAX RASE s. -Land and Improvement Value: N/A -Taxable Gross Sales/Year: -Total Employees: -Total revenue to the County/Year: ENVIRONMENT t. Air: N/A u. Water: N/A v. Soils: N/A w. Noise: N/A x. Signage: N/A ~~~-`t 6. FLAN CONSISTENCY This area is designated as Development. 7. STAFF EVALUATION a. Strengths: (1)Petitioner has received FAA approval to buzl-d a SO foot structure. (2)The Roanoke Regional Airport Executive Director has reviewed this proposal. She has no objections to the construction of a 50 foot tower. b. Weaknesses: (1)There is a discrepancy between the FAA application, "Notice of Proposed Construction" which refers to a SO foot structure and the Roanoke County "Use Not Provided for Permit" which refers to the construction of a 50 to 60 foot tower. If a structure higher than 50 feet were to be built, further FAA evaluation and approval would need to be obtained by Dominion Bankshares. c. Proffers Suggested: (1)Structure height limited to 50 feet including ali appurtenances and lighting above ground. 4 ~~~-~f . irport Corr;~-.sson W. Robert Nerberf, Chairman ~b L. Johnson, ice Chairman ..,el M. Schlanger Richard W. Robers Kit B. ICser ~^ 'r , -~ 5202 Aviation Drive Roanoke, Virginia 24012 (703) 362-1999 FAX (703)563-4838 Jacqueline L Shuck, Executive Director Robert C. Poole, Airport Manager Mr. Jon Hartley, Planner County of Roanoke Department of Planning and Zoning P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, Virginia 24018-0798 Dear Mr. Hartley: •~: August 27, 1990 Re: Dominion Bankshares Application for Use Not Provided For Permit Once again let me thank you for sending us information relative to Dominion Bankshares proposed new microwave tower for our review and comment. As Executive Director of the Roanoke Regional Airport, I raise no objections to the tower so long as it does not exceed 50 feet. If it were to go between 50 and 60 feet as provided in the application, further review by the FAA should occur prior to construction (see memo from John Hinkle attached). Once again, thank you for the opportunity to comment. JLS : csp Attachment Very truly yours, .~ c line L. Shuck Executive Director cc: Robert Poole 59o ti ~~ Memorandum Us Department d Transportation Ft~deral Aviation Adn~iNsfratlon subject: Dominion Bankshares Microwave Tower Date: August 14, 1990 From: Air Traffic Manager , Roanoke ATCT nt n~o HWilburn/362-1866 To: Jacqueline Shuck, Executive Director, Roanoke Regional Airport We have reviewed the data presented by your office concerning Dominion Bankshares' proposed construction of a tower at 5673 Airport Road. We concur with Mr. Jordan that this tower, as presented to the FAA, AEA-530, would not pose a hazard to the Roanoke Regional Airport's Air Traffic Operations. However, there is a discrepancy between the data presented to the FAA, AEA-530, and that presented to the Roanoke County Department of Planning and Zoning. The application to the County states a tower 50 to 60 feet high while the Notice of Proposed Construc- tion submitted to the FAA states a tower 50 feet high. If a tower higher than 50 feet is to be constructed, we request that the FAA further evaluate the impact of the increased height before the Roanoke County Planners and Board of Supervisors take final action. If we can be~~of further assistance, please call us at 362-1866. John D. Hinkle dtb NOT REMOVE CAR80NS JUN 21 R~U ` ~`~ ~ ~ ~ ,. Ae~onaut~cai Study Number NOTICE OF PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OR ALTERATION , ~ _ ~ . epprtrrxni d kanspatonm / , ~ . ~ ' na hAonon Abnr,btamon - ire of Proposal 2. Complete escriptlon of Structure 5 Ciass C WorkScheduieDates FAA A inUgpeellectwera0~atedpowerantlass~gnedlre~uerc;-,' New Construction ®Permanent app Begmn~ng upon Oldl(~ ring. proposed or modified AM FM or TV broadra~• year statiOnS utdurng this Structure I Alteration ^ Temporary (DUratlpfl months End B include sue and conhgurat~on of power transm~ssron Imes Name and address of individual. company, corporation, etc. propoSing file and then supporl~ng towers in the vicinity of FAA laci~~ties I Number. Street Crry. State and Zrp Code) construction a alteration. and public airports C Include information showing Sde onentation dimensions 7 0 3) 5 6 3 - 718 5 and construction matenats of the proposed strucuue tee node Telephone Number Dominion Bankshares Corporation ~ ..~ 21.8-23.6 GHz P.O. Box 13327 Private Operational Fixed Roanoke, VA 24040 Microwave Facility EIRP: Not to exceed 66 dBm Attn: Gerald H. Brittain See Attached Figure Vame, address and telepttorte number of proportenYs represent~ive i} different than 3 above. nk Orem F M ra r. Teledynamics, Inc. 3701 Saunders Ave. (804) 358-3933 P.O. Box 6852 Richmond , VA 2 3 2 2 2 (il more space is required, continue on a separate sheet./ Locatbn of Struc ture S. Hai ht and EtevatlOn (Complete to the nearest loot) 1. Coordinates B Nearest City or Town, antl State C Name of nearest airport, heliport.flightpark A- Elevation of site above mean sea revel "°a'°Sr Sec°"°~ Roanoke or seaplane base Roanoke 1 1 6 4 O ' " 7 19 2 6 (t 1 Distance to 4B I1) Distance from structure to nearest point of B. Height of Structure including all appurtenances and lighting (il any) above ~~ Mibs Q nearest runway 2 6 0 0 f t ground, or water if so situated 5 0 9 5 7 ~ 3 7 ° !21 Direction to tie (2) Direction from structure to avport C Overall height above mean sea revel IA - B) ,~ West 1214 iption of bcation of site with respect to highways. streets. airports. prominent terrain features. existing structures. etc Attach a U S Geological Survey quadrangle map or ...valent showing the relationship of construction site to nearest airport(s). (d more space is required. continue on a separate sheet of paper and attach to this nonce. / 5673 Air rt Road, Roanoke, VA t ice rs required by Parr 77 0/the Federal Aviation Regulations 111 C.F.R. Part 771 pursuant to Section 1 t 0101 the Federal Avrat ton Act of t 958. as amended 1 d9 U. S. C. t 1011. 'SOWS who knpwrnyly and willingly no/ate the Notice requrrernerirs of Part 77 are Subject to a Irn@ (tnmmal penalty) of not more than 5500 for the first OIIenSe and not more n S?.000 for subsequent offenses. pursuant to Section 902/a1 W the Federal Awarron Ad of 1958. as amended lag U S C ta721aI1 HEREBY CERTIFY that alt of the above statements made by me are true, complete, and correct to the best of my ~owitadge. in addition, I agree to obstruction mark and/or light the structure in accordance with established marking dr Ming standards it necessary. t! Typed Name/Titk of Person siM1r,Q lfotice 5/23/90 Gerald H. Brittain, Vice President IR fM tleE tD1~1 ..; : *.• - = ' , . y . ~ fM 1bN lbrrrl ipf IsOfla a apttvNe at:knowledpsrrlsrit .-. _ { rier0e N CerreYtre~On FM Ft~atl i~E to ggtinQ arty tires tfre project is abartdOrtad, tX ,~ ~ ~ ~~M ~~ r r ~ - '.~-/tt Mrt >1tI t~tows it~lori the start d oorrgnwyou •' ~~~ ^ ., . ^ Does rat requY'a a notice b FM,'~~_'.`;' ~. [] 1Afditirt live days tiler tits construction restates ib freight „r --, ,y d iderrtiRed as raM obsfrur~dst~ - b a n any tparWtstO d FArt, Part 77. $gDPf~ ~:~ - This determination expiros on unless: andvrorrAdrrot Dea hazard toalrrtaiQatfdit ~ NI extended, revised a terminaNd by MM issuing oMioe: ^ Is identified as sn obstruction tattler ~ (b) the construction is subject to the NCensirtg atrtttority at the federal Communications Commission end sn Part 77. Subpart C, Dd application for a oortstruction permit is made b lire fCC on or before the above expiation date. In such case standards d FAR . would not be a hazard b air navigation. the determination expires on Utt date prescribed fry the FCC for completion of constrtx:tion, or on the dare the FCC denies the application. ^ Srtould De obort ^ marked. tipfHed per FM AdvisoryCircuW NOTE: Request for extension of the ilffective period d this determinatton must be postmarked or delivered to the n data ti i f 1 i a ra te exp o or b issuing o fice at IesM 5 days pr lOr7N~1. Cf-aplsr(s? tt the structure is subject to the Ikertsirp authority of ttre FCC. a copy of this determination will be sent to that ction martirtg and lighting are trot A tr Ob u gency. s . .. nt?irl(~ ~ - _ _ twe~~~~- ~~91 ~ N ttlalts.. ~ ~~ ~j... - oNs ~ Fo„~ ~~~ (o-ast % '~ DO NC~T REMOVE r:ARRnNR DOMII~ON BANKSHARES CORPORATION 23 GHz MICROWAVE SYSTEM co~sE~RcN 11720 Sunrise Valley Drive STATE OF VIRGINIA 6/10/90 Reston, Virflinia 22091 SITE TOPOGRAPHIC MAP 7.6' SERIES V18A-D88 ROANOKE. VA ~MS~x ~!f• ~ i~vT£~'~f/~i/6 E 4 3 ~! ~~~ 0 ;, . 5~,,,; 0~4 NOT Tb SCkGE / ~~ ~~ O N~ynEL v,~aac ,evey.~r r ~~~ ~ J~ / (~ ~ ;c ~ ~~ ~ s PRorasEo ,. ~//3A - DB 5 BLDG. SITE LOCATION PLAN V13A-D83 ~OMSFllllpl 1560'• ~jC1~'LE ~ il~ ~ I ~ 1 iJ '~ 1 O !O ZD 40 60 QO r ' N or ~a ~ o~ ~~~ ~o • PRoPgsE~ ~_ MOiW /~Lt' LO(it-T Lav6: 7'f ~ 37~ 37" BG /~ 6. ~QOoF EL . // 7l~'hiy.SG ~~. P,P~r~acE,o ~y~~,w~.r i ~ RWM Loc~av - 6' /3Ct~••/ ~Et ~ ~ oPl~/ rv .v,r+~v h'Oo F CLC v, 'Q :~ ~~ `~6 C~ ~ifiC/~ET 3'~'4L SITE PLOT PLAN VISA-DBS ~ COMSFMpI ~i C~MSEARCN An Alliance Telecommunications Company DOMINION BANKSHARES CORPORATION ~qa-~ 5673 AIRPORT RD Comsearch • 11720 Sunrise Valley Drive • Reston, Virginia 22091 • (703) 620-6300 V - 2.0 P/N 102999 -~ 2' A 2' SECTION 8EC SECTION LE8 BRACE 8ECTION ,. LENGTH • PART* BIZE SIZE NEIeHT DIA11 !0' V- 2.0 102999 i 9/!6' 183f 1/2 • 20' 8- 2.5 !00312 i- 1/4 '3/8 444f 9/!6• 20' 8- 3.0 !00243 i- i/2 9/16' '3SOt A-323 BOLTS ~~ SEE TABLE ABOVE VIEW A TYPICAL LE8 CONt~ECTI FOR FABRICATED SECTI BOLT P/N 10'3762 - FOOT P/N !00045 S - 2.5 P/N 100312 I 13 -~ ~._ 6. 8 3' C-C VIEW B PRELIMINARY DESIGN DO NOT 8UIL0 50' ' - ~- _ _- f - _ _ - - - -- - - - - -~. •~ \ ~~ _ " _ ~'C'lu ( `~S/' ~ ~ ~- - `^ -SUN YYY w // ~ ~ ~ 1 ~~ .~a, - ~ + ~ ~ ~o ~ ~ REG/ NAL L~ ..'~, q9o-~ NORTB ~Me c~~~y d GdY ~~~ ~~ , ~ .~ I 2 g2 ` ~~ ,a, a ~.~ IN 1 X ~~ \--~ -~~ r - ~~ :, .~ 62 6 ~ o i~,~c c s v r~~pr„~ / ,, \,~ 0 ~~ l 2384 8 i us~k R3 ~ ~8 29 • 19 ~ i 11 7 ~ ~ i '~~~ ~ ~ ,6 `21 2 IS 22 ~ 14 DOMZNton.( 3An~<<SHA2C5 C-d~(~ara~;v,~ COMMUNITY SERVICES tv~ 1 X ~~o~ a Use r~o+ ~~ov~c~Ecl .~v~'i AND DEVELOPMENT 3~ , ~ ~ _ ! _ ~ .r AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD ATTUESDAO~SEPTEMBERY25I,M1990T~TION CENTER ON ORDINANCE 92590-19 REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 81490-6, WHICH IMPOSED OR INCREASED USER FEES FOR THE PARRS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT, AND ENACTING AN ORDINANCE TO AUTHORIZE THE ESTABLISHMENT OF CERTAIN FEES FOR SAID DEPARTMENT WHEREAS, on August 14, 1990 the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, adopted Ordinance 81490-6 which authorized the imposition of user fees for the Parks and Recreation Department; and, WHEREAS, on August 28, 1990, the Board voted to reconsider this action and to repeal said ordinance; and, WHEREAS, the Board hereby adopts an ordinance to authorize the establishment of certain fees for certain recreational activities, and to appropriate from the general fund sufficient resources to defray the costs and expenses of these activities; and, WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on September 12, 1990, and the second reading of this ordinance was held on September 25, 1990. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That Ordinance No. 81490-6 is hereby repealed in its entirety. 2. That the Director of the Roanoke County Department of Parks and Recreation is hereby authorized to establish fees for parks and recreation services and activities, subject to the approval of the County Administrator, and subject to the following 1 standards: a. Definitions: Indirect costs include the general fund appropriation for each of the cost centers associated with the recreation area based on the previous fiscal year budget, plus the allocation of the central administrative costs for the Department of Parks and Recreation, and in the case of athletics, the share of the ballfield maintenance, which is provided by the Parks Division of the Department. Direct costs relate to the specific costs of instructors and associated supplies. The registration fee is proposed to be established at $5 per participant, per activity and the membership fee is proposed to be $10 annually for senior citizens, in lieu of a registration fee. b. Standards• The standards are as follows: i. For youth athletics the general fund of the County shall subsidize all direct and indirect costs of these activities. For fiscal year 1990-91 the amount of this subsidy shall be $32,075. ii. For community education and leisure arts the fee shall be based upon a $5 registration fee, per participant, plus 25% of the indirect cost, plus 100% of the direct cost. In any of the programs offered by these divisions primarily for youth under 18 years of age, there shall be no $5 per participant registration fee. 2 iii. For special events the fee shall be based upon a recovery of 40% of the indirect cost and 100% of the direct cost. iv. For therapeutics the fee shall be based upon a recovery of 20% of the direct cost. v. For senior citizens the fee shall be based upon a $10 membership fee, plus 100% of direct cost associated with the program. vi. For adult athletics the fee shall be based upon 100% of the direct cost. The general fund of the County shall subsidize the balance of the costs for this activity. For fiscal year 1990-91 the amount of this subsidy shall be $42,467. vii. For outdoor adventure the fee shall be based upon 100% of the direct cost. The general fund of the County shall subsidize the balance of the costs for this activity. For fiscal year 1990-91 the amount of this subsidy shall be $10,879. 3. That the Director shall develop guidelines for the waiver or reduction of fees based upon demonstrable hardship and inability to pay and shall implement related policies. 4. That the effective date of this ordinance shall be September 25, 1990. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: Supervisor Eddy A COPY TESTE: 3 ~f Brenda J. Holt n, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File John Chambliss, Assistant County Steve Carpenter, Director, Parks Reta Busher, Director, Managemen Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance Administrator & Recreation t & Budget 4 ACTION N0. ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: September 25, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: Second Reading of an Ordinance Rescinding Ordinance 81490-6, Imposing or Increasing User Fees for the Parks and Recreation Department and the Appropriation of Funds COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR' S COMMENTS : G~~„ (~v~iccrnp EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: On September 12, 1990, the Board of Supervisors approved the first reading of the attached ordinance rescinding Ordinance 81490- 6, and considered the methodology of the attached ordinance to establish fees for the various programs within the Parks and Recreation Department. Fees for programs under Adult Athletics, Youth Athletics, and Outdoor Adventure are included at the June 30, 1990 level. An appropriation of $85,421 is required from the unappropriated balance of the General Fund to replace projected revenues from this fee policy change. FISCAL IMPACT: The cost of approving the attached ordinance is $85,421 which should be taken from the unappropriated fund balance. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff suggests approval of the second reading of the attached ordinance and appropriation of $85,421 from the unappropriated fund balance. A plan is being developed for the use of the $74,579 for Grounds Maintenance which was approved at the September 12 meeting. Respectfully submitted, Appro ed by, 4 ~ ~ _ _ John M. Chambl'ss, Jr. Elmer C. Hodge Assistant Administrator County Administrator ---------------------------------------- Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) Motion by: ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs Eddy - Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers ~-1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 25, 1990 ORDINANCE REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 81490-6, WHICH IMPOSED OR INCREASED USER FEES FOR THE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT, AND ENACTING AN ORDINANCE TO AUTHORIZE THE ESTABLISHMENT OF CERTAIN FEES FOR SAID DEPARTMENT WHEREAS, on August 14, 1990 the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, adopted Ordinance 81490-6 which authorized the imposition of user fees for the Parks and Recreation Department; and, WHEREAS, on August 28, 1990, the Board voted to reconsider this action and to repeal said ordinance; and, WHEREAS, the Board hereby adopts an ordinance to authorize the establishment of certain fees for certain recreational activities, and to appropriate from the general fund sufficient resources to defray the costs and expenses of these activities; and, WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on September 12, 1990, and the second reading of this ordinance was held on September 25, 1990. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That Ordinance No. 81490-6 is hereby repealed in its entirety. 2. That the Director of the Roanoke County Department of Parks and Recreation is hereby authorized to establish fees for parks and recreation services and activities, subject to the approval of the County Administrator, and subject to the following standards: 1 R-~ a. Definitions: Indirect costs include the general fund appropriation for each of the cost centers associated with the recreation area based on the previous fiscal year budget, plus the allocation of the central administrative costs for the Department of Parks and Recreation, and in the case of athletics, the share of the ballfield maintenance, which is provided by the Parks Division of the Department. Direct costs relate to the specific costs of instructors and associated supplies. The registration fee is proposed to be established at $5 per participant, per activity and the membership fee is proposed to be $10 annually for senior citizens, in lieu of a registration fee. b. Standards: The standards are as follows: i. For youth athletics the general fund of the County shall subsidize all direct and indirect costs of these activities. For fiscal year 1990-91 the amount of this subsidy shall be $32,075. ii. For community education and leisure arts the fee shall be based upon a $5 registration fee, per participant, plus 25~ of the indirect cost, plus 100 of the direct cost. In these divisions primarily for youth any of the programs offered by under 18 years of age, there shall be no $5 per participant registration fee. iii. For special events the fee shall be based upon 2 f ,~ a recovery of 40$ of the indirect cost and 100 of the direct cost. iv. For therapeutics the fee shall be based upon a recovery of 20~ of the direct cost. v. For senior citizens the fee shall be based upon a $10 membership fee, plus 100 of direct cost associated with the program. vi. For adult athletics the fee shall be based upon 100 of the direct cost. The general fund of the County shall subsidize the balance of the costs for this activity. For fiscal year 1990-91 the amount of this subsidy shall be $42,467. vii. For outdoor adventure the fee shall be based upon 100 of the direct cost. The general fund of the County shall subsidize the balance of the costs for this activity. For fiscal year 1990-91 the amount of this subsidy shall be $10,879. 3. That the Director shall develop guidelines for the waiver or reduction of fees based upon demonstrable hardship and inability to pay and shall implement related policies. 4. That the effective date of this ordinance shall be September 25, 1990. 3 r ~r w,~ .• AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 25, 1990 ORDINANCE 92590-14 AMENDING AND REENACTING SECTION 21-153, SECTION 21-157, SECTION 21- 159, SECTION 21-160, SECTION 21-162 and SECTION 21-163, OF ARTICLE VIII, TAR ON PREPARED FOOD AND BEVERAGES, OF CHAPTER 21 OF THE ROANORE COUNTY CODE, TAXATION, TO INCREASE TAE CRIMINAL PENALTIES FOR FAILURE TO FILE THE REQUIRED RETURNS OR TO COLLECT OR PAY THE TAX IMPOSED BY THIS ARTICLE. WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, by ordinance 51088-8 adopted a tax on prepared food and beverages as authorized by § 58.1-3833 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended; and WHEREAS, § 58.1-3916.1 authorizes a local governing body to impose criminal penalties for refusal or willful failure to file a tax return or for making false statements with the intent to defraud in such returns; and WHEREAS, since the effective date of this ordinance there have been numerous prosecutions of businesses for failure to collect or pay to the Treasurer of Roanoke County the tax levied upon prepared food and beverages under Article VIII of Chapter 21 of the Roanoke County Code; and WHEREAS, the lack of stronger criminal penalties has caused difficulty for the Office of the Commonwealth's Attorney of Roanoke County and the Office of the Treasurer of Roanoke County in collecting these taxes where the amount of such defalcation is substantial; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on September 11, 1990, and the second reading was held on September t 25, 1990. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That Article VIII, TAX ON PREPARED FOOD AND BEVERAGES, of Chapter 21, TARATION, of the Roanoke County Code, is hereby amended and reenacted by amending Section 21-153, Section 21-157, Section 21-159, Section 21-160, Section 21-162, and Section 21-163 to read and provide as follows: Section 21-153. Returns ~2epe~s-and remittances generally. Every seller of food with respect to which a tax is levied under this article shall make out a return ~ep~t, upon such forms and setting forth such information as the Commissioner of the Revenue may prescribe and require, showing the amount of food charges collected and the tax required to be collected, and shall sign and deliver such return t to the y Treasurer of Roanoke County with a remittance of such tax. Such return ~epe~s and remittance shall be made on or before the twentieth day of each month, covering the amount of tax collected during the preceding month. Section 21-157. Duty of seller when going out of business. Whenever any seller required to collect and ~y pay to the County a tax under this Article "--ani-zr2 shall cease to operate or otherwise dispose of his business, any tax payable under this article shall become immediately due and payable and such person shall immediately make a return ~ and pay the tax due. l Section 21-159. Enforcement; duty of Commissioner of the Revenue. The Commissioner of the Revenue shall promulgate rules and regulations for the interpretation, administration and enforcement of this article. It shall also be the duty of the Commissioner of the Revenue to ascertain the name of every seller liable for the collection of the tax imposed by this article, who fails, refuses or neglects to collect such tax or to make the returns ~e}9e~s- and remittances required by this Article ~-~~. The Commissioner of the Revenue shall have all of the enforcement powers as authorized by Article 1, Chapter 31 of Title 58.1 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, for purposes of this Article. Section 21-160. Procedure upon failure to collect, report etc. If any seller, whose duty it is to do so shall fail or refuse to collect the tax imposed under this Article ..~~e and to make within the time provided in this Article ~~~e, the returns ~~ and remittances mentioned in this Article ..~~~, the Commissioner of the Revenue shall proceed in such manner as he may deem best to obtain facts and information on which to base his estimate of the tax due. As soon as the Commissioner of the Revenue shall procure such facts and information as he is able to obtain upon which to base the assessment of any tax payable by any seller who has failed or refused to collect such tax and to make such return t and remittance, he shall proceed to determine and assess against such seller the tax and penalties provided for by this Article ""u-r~i~'r2 and shall notify such seller, by registered mail sent t to his last known place of address, of the total amount of such tax and penalties and the total amount thereof shall be payable within ten (10) days from the date such notice is sent. Section 21-162. Penalty of late remittance or false return. (a) If any seller whose duty it is to do so shall fail or refuse to file any return ~e}~e-~ required by this Article ~-~~ or to remit to the y Treasurer of Roanoke County the tax require to be collected and paid under this Article ~-~~ within the time and in the amount specified in this Article ~~~, there shall be added to such tax by the Commissioner of the Revenue Eat of Roanoke Countv a penalty in the amount of ten (10) percent if the failure is not for more than thirty (30) days, with an additional ten (10) percent of the total amount of tax owed for each additional thirty (30) days or fraction thereof during which the failure continues, not to exceed twenty-five (25) percent in the aggregate, with a minimum penalty of two dollars ($2.00). (b) In the case of a false or fraudulent return with intent to defraud the County of any tax due under this Article ~~~, a penalty of fifty (50) percent of the tax shall be assessed against the person required to collect such tax. Section 21-163. Violations of article. (a) It shall be unlawful and a violation of this Chapter for any person to fail, refuse or neglect to comply with any provision of this Article. Such violation shall constitute (i~ a Class 3 misdemeanor if the amount of tax levied or assessed in connection with any return required by this Article but unpaid as of the date of conviction is $1,000.00 or less, or (ii) a Class 1 misdemeanor if the amount of tax levied or assessed in connection with any return required by this Article but unpaid as of the date of conviction is more than $1,000.00. Sbl Conviction of such violation shall not relieve any person from the payment, collection or remittance of the taxes provided for in this Article ..~~~. Any agreement by any person to pay the taxes provided for in this Article "'ur~v-'rci2 by a series of installment payments shall not relieve any person of criminal liability for violation of this Article ~~~e-until the full amount of taxes agreed to be paid by such person is received by the Treasurer of Roanoke County. Each failure, refusal, neglect or violation, and each day's continuance thereof, shall constitute a separate offense. F ~ t r ~ .-.L. .. l .. L ~ .. L. -. l l .. ~ '8~~~ TP.~C'CS1TG~ GVIT~ G~ L'I-C1-GT.~ r~'TlIS' .7l / . 'o~r6~t6i~,---?l~~-e~e~-~-~-5 GLerrzsiraui~-~er''icr~v~-9nuTr 2. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect on and after October 1, 1990. On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Brenda J. Hol on, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File R. Wayne Compton, Commissioner of Revenue Alfred C. Anderson, Treasurer Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney Skip Burkart, Commonwealth Attorney Magistrate Police Department Roanoke Law Library, 315 Church Avenue, S.W., Rke, 24016 Main Library Roanoke County Code Book Roanoke County Family Services Court, Intake Counsellor ACTION NO. ITEM NO. ~-~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: September 25, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: ORDINANCE AMENDING AND REENACTING SECTION 21-153, SECTION 21-157, SECTION 21-159, SECTION 21-160, SECTION 21-162 AND SECTION 21-163, OF ARTICLE VIII, TAX ON PREPARED FOOD AND BEVERAGES, OF CHAPTER 21 OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE, TAXATION, TO INCREASE THE CRIMINAL PENALTIES FOR FAILURE TO FILE THE REQUIRED RETURNS OR TO COLLECT OR PAY THE TAX IMPOSED BY THIS ARTICLE. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpose of these amendments of the Meals Tax Ordinance is to increase the potential penalties for failure to file or pay meals tax collections in order to improve collection of certain delinquent accounts. BACKGROUND• When the Meals Tax Ordinance was originally adopted in 1988, it was hoped that the threat of a Class 3 Misdemeanor would be a sufficient deterrent to insure prompt payment of meals tax col- lections by sellers of taxable food and beverages. Since that time there have been several instances where legal action by the Commissioner's Office has been necessary to collect meal tax revenues in excess of $1,000.00. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: These amendments have been drafted at the request of the Commonwealth's Attorneys Office in order to provide more teeth in the Meals Tax Ordinance for collection of delinquent tax proceeds. In cases where the taxes owed to the Treasurer exceed $1,000.00, the potential threat of a maximum $500.00 fine allowed for a Class 3 Misdemeanor has not been sufficient to insure prompt remittance by the seller of these tax proceeds being held. FISCAL IMPACTS• There exists at least two different fiscal impacts. The first impact is the potential for increased fines from successful Iii- ~ criminal prosecution of these offenses. The second impact is the potential for prompt compliance with the payment provisions of the ordinance arising from the deterrent effect of increased criminal penalties. ALTERNATIVES• 1. Adopt the proposed amendments. 2. Retain the current maximum penalty for failure or refusal to pay meals tax collections to the treasurer at a fine of not more than $500.00. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the adoption of these amendments. Respectfully submitted, V'~ Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney Action Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by Eddy Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers Vote No Yes Abs ~_a AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 25, 1990 ORDINANCE AMENDING AND REENACTING SECTION 21- 153, Section 21-157, Section 21-159, Section 21-160, Section 21-162 and Section 21-163, OF ARTICLE VIII, TAX ON PREPARED FOOD AND BEVERAGES, OF CHAPTER 21 OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE, TAXATION, TO INCREASE THE CRIMINAL PENALTIES FOR FAILURE TO FILE THE REQUIRED RETURNS OR TO COLLECT OR PAY THE TAX IMPOSED BY THIS ARTICLE. WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, by ordinance 51088-8 adopted a tax on prepared food and beverages as authorized by § 58.1-3833 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended; and WHEREAS, § 58.1-3916.1 authorizes a local governing body to impose criminal penalties for refusal or willful failure to file a tax return or for making false statements with the intent to defraud in such returns; and WHEREAS, since the effective date of this ordinance there have been numerous prosecutions of businesses for failure to collect or pay to the Treasurer of Roanoke County the tax levied upon prepared food and beverages under Article VIII of Chapter 21 of the Roanoke County Code; and WHEREAS, the lack of stronger criminal penalties has caused difficulty for the Office of the Commonwealth's Attorney of Roanoke County and the Office of the Treasurer of Roanoke County in collecting these taxes where the amount of such defalcation is substantial; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on September 11, 1990, and the second reading was held on September ~-a 25, 1990. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That Article VIII, TAX ON PREPARED FOOD AND BEVERAGES, of Chapter 21, TAXATION, of the Roanoke County Code, is hereby amended and reenacted by amending Section 21-153, Section 21-157, Section 21-159, Section 21-160, Section 21-162, and Section 21-163 to read and provide as follows: Section 21-153. Returns Rep~~and remittances generally. Every seller of food with respect to which a tax is levied under this article shall make out a return ~ege~-~, upon such forms and setting forth such information as the Commissioner of the Revenue may prescribe and require, showing the amount of food charges collected and the tax required to be collected, and shall sign and deliver such return ~epe~t to the y Treasurer of Roanoke County with a remittance of such tax. Such return ~g and remittance shall be made on or before the twentieth day of each month, covering the amount of tax collected during the preceding month. Section 21-157. Duty of seller when going out of business. Whenever any seller required to collect and ~ pay to the County a tax under this Article ~-~~~ shall cease to operate or otherwise dispose of his business, any tax payable under this article shall become immediately due and payable and such person shall immediately make a return ~epe~t and pay the tax due. R-~. Section 21-159. Enforcement; duty of Commissioner of the Revenue. The Commissioner of the Revenue shall promulgate rules and regulations for the interpretation, administration and enforcement of this article. It shall also be the duty of the Commissioner of the Revenue to ascertain the name of every seller liable for the collection of the tax imposed by this article, who fails, refuses or neglects to collect such tax or to make the returns = and remittances required by this Article --~z. The Commissioner of the Revenue shall have all of the enforcement powers as authorized by Article 1, Chapter 31 of Title 58.1 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, for purposes of this Article. Section 21-160. Procedure upon failure to collect report etc. If any seller, whose duty it is to do so shall fail or refuse to collect the tax imposed under this Article ~~~ and to make within the time provided in this Article ~-~~~, the returns peg and remittances mentioned in this Article ~~~, the Commissioner of the Revenue shall proceed in such manner as he may deem best to obtain facts and information on which to base his estimate of the tax due. As soon as the Commissioner of the Revenue shall procure such facts and information as he is able to obtain upon which to base the assessment of any tax payable by any seller who has failed or refused to collect such tax and to make such return ~e~ and remittance, he shall proceed to determine and assess against such seller the tax and penalties provided for by this Article ~~~ and shall notify such seller, by registered mail sent ~- 2, to his last known place of address, of the total amount of such tax and penalties and the total amount thereof shall be payable within ten (10) days from the date such notice is sent. Section 21-162. Penalty of late remittance or false return. (a) If any seller whose duty it is to do so shall fail or refuse to file any return t required by this Article ~-~~ or to remit to the E-e~~ Treasurer of Roanoke Countv the tax require to be collected and paid under this Article ~~e within the time and in the amount specified in this Article ~~~2, there shall be added to such tax by the y Treasurer of Roanoke Countv a penalty in the amount of ten (10) percent if the failure is not for more than thirty (30) days, with an additional ten (10) percent of the total amount of tax owed for each additional thirty (30) days or fraction thereof during which the failure continues, not to exceed twenty-five (25) percent in the aggregate, with a minimum penalty of two dollars ($2.00). (b) In the case of a false or fraudulent return with intent to defraud the County of any tax due under this Article =, a penalty of fifty (50) percent of the tax shall be assessed against the person required to collect such tax. Section 21-163. Violations of article. (a) It shall be unlawful and a violation of this Chapter for any person to fail refuse or neglect to comply with any provision of this Article. Such violation shall constitute (i~, a Class 3 misdemeanor if the amount of tax levied or assessed R-a in connection with any return required by this Article but unpaid as of the date of conviction is 51,000.00 or less, or (ii) a Class 1 misdemeanor if the amount of tax levied or assessed in connection with any return required by this Article but unpaid as of the date of conviction is more than $1,000.00. ~_ Conviction of such violation shall not relieve any person from the payment, collection or remittance of the taxes provided for in this Article ..~~e. Any agreement by any person to pay the taxes provided for in this Article "'ur~i~-i2 by a series of installment payments shall not relieve any person of criminal liability for violation of this Article ~'~r~until the full amount of taxes agreed to be paid by such person is received by the Treasurer of Roanoke Countv. Each failure, refusal, neglect or violation, and each day's continuance thereof, shall constitute a separate offense. -- rlug3~-~ede~ea - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ mo ,~ , , ~e~ e -e~--e e s ~~ - ~r o 3~ ~ ~- o e e ~a~te~-e e e e~--e ~ ; e.~w .. ~ l ~a1. '~ l .',~ " F 1 ~ l' ~ e~ ~e~Se~e " Z L7 Trg. -CC 1T1"~G -RTTCS~ G"I IG ~rea -~~re~--e ~ • --d - ~ / / r ae r am ~-e~ ~~- ~re~ee r-sue= R-~ 2. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect on and after October 1, 1990. Remarks by Dr. Willis P. Lanier at Board Meeting 9-2590 Thank you, Mr. Chairman, and members of the Board. I am pleased that we are so carefully deliberating an issue of long-term economic impact as well as a critical issue of psychological importance. We certainly want to demonstrate a spirit of cooperative participation and at the same time, to demonstrate fiscal responsibility and sound judgment. How we act and react will send several important signals, to the City, to the State, as well as our own County taxpayers who must ultimately make the payments to satisfy our financial obligations. Let us not have both flashes of brilliance, and bad judgment at the same time. Brilliant for participating in and helping fund this community project but bad judgment for failing to demand that the agreement between all parties concerned be structured to protect the County's best interest by providing a fair return on our investment. It is only right that all parties share in the profits in the same proportion as they share in the costs. It is likewise not morally right for the City to take the tax revenues from that portion of the over- all project that the County has helped underwrite and then to use those revenues to pay the City's share or to fund other and unrelated projects. Everybody's crystal ball seems to be in agreement that tougher economic times are ahead for all of us. Let's make certain that we have thought this thing through to the end before we sign the check. If the agreement is not structured to protect our investment with no loop holes, then I urge you to table any action on this matter until such time as the agreement can be restructured into a suitable form. If this criteria can be met, then I would support this project. There is a story that floats around everytime we have a presidential election. It is - once there was a man who had two sons. One became a sea captain and one became vice president. Neither were ever heard from again. Let's don't let the same thing happen to our $4 million dollars. of aoarva,~~ ~ 'A ~ 2 A o ~ Z ~ a 18 Est 88 SFSQUICENTENN~P~ d Bcnun~ul8ckinnin4 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS RICHARD W. ROBERS, CHAIRMAN Se tember 2 8 19 9 CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT P i OSTEVEN A. MCGRAW, VICE-CHAIRMAN CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT LEE B. EDDY WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERAL DISTRICT Mrs. Frances R. Holsinger 7678 Fold Mill Forest Drive, S.W. Roanoke, VA 24018 Dear Mrs. Holsinger: This is to advise that at their meeting held on Tuesday, September 25, 1990, the Board of Supervisors voted unanimously to appoint you as a member of the League of Older Americans Advisory Board to complete the unexpired portion of Mr. Murry K. Whitefs one-year term. This term will expire March 31, 1991. State law provides that any person elected, re-elected, appointed, or re-appointed to any body be furnished a copy of the Freedom of Information Act; your copy is enclosed. We are also sending you a copy of the Conflicts of Interest Act. Both of these acts were amended by the Virginia General Assembly in July, 1989. On behalf of the Supervisors and the citizens of Roanoke County, please accept our sincere thanks and appreciation for your willingness to accept this appointment. Very truly yours, ~. Brenda J. Holton, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors bjh Enclosures pc: Mr. Prentice A. Webb, President League of Older Americans ~~ All-AMf RICA CITY ~• ' I I I ~' C~~r~rt~ u~ ~~~tnu~~ ,~~' 1979 1989 P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 (703) 772-2004 ~ O aoaNO~~ i ~ ,w Z J ~a 18 j t51 8$ SFSCUICENTENN~P~ J Bc auN~ul BckinninK COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE C~oitn~~ of ~ottnnkr Mr. Ronald M. Martin 7578 Countrywood Drive Roanoke, VA 24018 Dear Mr. Martin: September 28, 1990 u L ~Mf RICA clTr 1'I I~~ 1979 1989 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS RICHARD W. ROBERS. CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT STEVEN A. MCGRAW. VICE-CHAIRMAN CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT LEE B. EDDY WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT This is to advise that at their meeting held on Tuesday, September 25, 1990, the Board of Supervisors voted unanimously to appoint you as a member of the Industrial Development Authority for a four- year term beginning September 26, 1990, and ending September 26, 1994. State law provides that any person elected, re-elected, appointed, or re-appointed to any body be furnished a copy of the Freedom of Information Act; your copy is enclosed. We are also sending you a copy of the Conflicts of Interest Act. Both of these acts were amended by the Virginia General Assembly in July, 1989. It is necessary that you take an oath of office before the Clerk of the Roanoke County Circuit Court. This oath must be administered rior to your participation on this Committee. Please telephone Mrs. Elizabeth Stokes, Clerk, at 387-6208, as soon as possible and arrange to have the oath administered. On behalf of the Supervisors and the citizens of Roanoke County, please accept our sincere thanks and appreciation for your willingness to accept this appointment. Very truly yours, Brenda J. Holton, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors bjh Enclosures pc: Mrs. Elizabeth Stokes, Clerk of Circuit Court Timothy Gubala, Secretary, IDA P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24018-0798 (703) 772-2004 O~ POANp~~ ~ , I~ i z ,Z a 18 ~EA S I $$ SFSGUICENTENN~P~ 1 (3rauli~u/Btkinnink COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE C~n~in~~ of ~nttnvke Mr. Paul J. Whittemore P. O. Box 538 Salem, VA 24153 Dear Mr. Whittemore: September 27, 1990 ~lI~MERICA CITY ' I I I ~ I 1979 1989 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS RICHARD W. ROBERS, CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT STEVEN A. MCGRAW. VICE-CHAIRMAN CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT LEE B. EDDY WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT At their regular meeting on Tuesday, September 25, 1990, the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors unanimously approved the request of the Loyal Order of the Moose Lodge No. 284 for a 50/50 Raffle permit. The raffles will be conducted on September 26, 28, 29; October 3, 5, 6, 10, 12, 13, 17, 19, 20, 24, 26, 27, 31; November 2, 3, 7, 9, 10, 14, 16, 17, 21, 23, 24, 28, 30; December 1, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 15, 19, 21, 22, 26, 28, and 29. The fee has been paid and your receipt is enclosed. You may consider this letter to be your permit, and I suggest it be displayed on the premises where the raffle is to be conducted. The State Code provides that raffle and bingo permits be issued on a calendar-year basis and such permits issued will expire on December 31, 1990. This permit, however, is only valid on the date specified in your application. PLEASE READ YOUR APPLICATION CAREFULLY. YOU HAVE AGREED TO COMPLY WITH STATE AND LOCAL REGULATIONS AND FAILURE TO COMPLY MAY RESULT IN CRIMINAL PENALTIES AND REVOKING OF YOUR PERMIT. YOU MUST FILE A FINANCIAL REPORT BY NOVEMBER 1 OF EACH CALENDAR YEAR. PLEASE SUBMIT A NEW APPLICATION AT LEAST 60 DAYS PRIOR TO DATE OR DATES YOUR ORGANIZATION PLANS TO HOLD BINGO OR RAFFLES. PERMITS EXPIRE ON DECEMBER 31 OF EACH CALENDAR YEAR. If I may be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me at 772-2003. Sincerely, L~~, - - ~' Brenda J. Holton, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisor Enclosures cc: Commissioner of the Revenue Commonwealth Attorney County Treasurer P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 (703) 772-2004 O~ AOANpt~ ~ ,~ 2 ~ ~ z v a 18 (~so~ 88 SFSQUICENTENN~P~ d Beauti/ulBr~innin4 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE Ms. Marcy Johnson 7881 Bradshaw Road Salem, VA 24153 Dear Ms. Johnson: September 27, 1990 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS RICHARD W. ROBERS. CHAIRMAN GVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT STEVEN A. MCGRAW. VICE-CHAIRMAN GTAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT LEE B. EDDY WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT At their regular meeting on Tuesday, September 25, 1990, the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors unanimously approved the request of the Mason's Cove Elementary School PTA for a raffle permit. The raffle will be conducted on October 20, 1990. The fee has been paid and your receipt is enclosed. You may consider this letter to be your permit, and I suggest it be displayed on the premises where the raffle is to be conducted. The State Code provides that raffle and bingo permits be issued on a calendar-year basis and such permits issued will expire on December 31, 1990. This permit, however, is only valid on the date specified in your application. PLEASE READ YOUR APPLICATION CAREFULLY. YOU HAVE AGREED TO COMPLY WITH STATE AND LOCAL REGULATIONS AND FAILURE TO COMPLY MAY RESULT IN CRIMINAL PENALTIES AND REVOKING OF YOUR PERMIT. YO U MUST FILE A FINANCL4L REPORT BY NOVEMBER 1 OF EACH C 4LENDAR YEAR. PLEASE SUBMIT A NEW APPLICATION AT LEAST 60 DAYS PRIOR TO DATE OR DATES YOUR ORGANIZATION PLANS TO HOLD BINGO OR RAFFLES. PERMITS EXPIRE ON DECEMBER 31 OF EACH CALENDAR YEAR. If I may be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me at 772-2003. Sincerely, Brenda J. Holton, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisor bjh Enclosures cc: Commissioner of the Revenue Commonwealth Attorney County Treasurer ui ~n+enlucrtr (~ (~I1' ~ I I I' ~i~ ~~~ 1-~ ~ i~i-~ ~~~~~ 1979 1989 P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24018-0798 (703> 772-2004 pF P~AND~F ~ ,A ~ 2 A 2 o a 18 (E50 88 SIcSOU1CENTENN~P~' A Brnuti~ul /3ct;innink COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE September 27, 1990 Rev. Steven W. Harris Baptist Children's Home & Family Services P. O. Box 849 Salem, VA 24153 Dear Reverend Harris: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS RICHARD W. ROBERS, CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT STEVEN A. MCGRAW. VICE-CHAIRMAN CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT LEE B. EDDY WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERAL DISTRICT On behalf of the Board of Supervisors, I would like to take this opportunity to let you know of our appreciation for your attending the meeting on Tuesday, September 25, 1990, to offer the invocation. We feel it is most important to ask God's blessing on these meetings so that all is done according to His will and for the good of all citizens. Thank you for sharing your time with us. RWR/bj h ~Ll-~MfRICA CITY ,.. 1'II~I C~~~xn~ u~ ~~~~~~~ ,97 9 1989 Sincerely, . W. Robers, Chairman Roanoke County Board of Supervisors P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24018-0798 (703) 772-2004 ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: September 25, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: Introduction of Mr. Kenneth L. Hardesty, Assistant Director of General Services COUNTY ADMINISTRATORS COMMENTS: BACKGROUND: Kenneth Hardesty reported to work as the replacement for Roy Nester on September 4, 1990. Ken has an outstanding background and brings a wealth of building and construction experience to the County. He comes to us from Greensboro, N. C. where his last position was that of Construction Coordinator and Assistant Program Administrator. '?d. t 's .' Ct~> r~.~~-tw„r~WV~_,.~ yn Ken will be present at the board meeting and will be at that time. A brief outline of his background and experience is attached. R~s~p~e~t~ully submitted, Approved by, Gardner Smith, Director Elmer C. Hodge Department of General Services County Administrator ----------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) Eddy Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers R E NNE T H L. H A R D E S T Y POSITION TITLE YEARS Last Job: Construction Coordinator and Program Administrator, North Carolina Prison Emergency Construction Program 2 Other Jobs: Real Estate Construction Specialist, Branch Banking & Trust Co., Raleigh, NC 3 Project Manager and Director of Property Management, Adams Bilt Company, Raleigh NC 2 Self-employed, CEO, Foxwood Construction and Development Corporation Hardesty Company, Western Maryland 18 Officer and Instructor, Fork Union Military Academy, Fork Union, VA 3 EDUCATION BA, West Virginia University, MA, Exeter University, England OTHER CREDENTIALS Licensed General Contractor, MD, WV, PA Licensed by Maryland Banking Commission Charter Member of two Home Builder Associations Engineer Club Officer Certification for Director of Facilities Engineering, TN PERSONAL Married, grown children, has contract on a home in the Valley. OUTLINE OF BOARD REPORT I. BACKGROUND: A. In 1985, the BOARD OF SUPERVISORS adopted the EXPLORE concept. B. In 1986, County coordinated community planning process in east and west Roanoke County for EXPLORE Park and Roanoke River Greenway. C. In 1987, County assisted Explore in the negotiation and acquisition of Palmer Estate. D. In 1989, County received All America City Award with assistance from Botetourt County and EXPLORE. E. Earlier this year, County made EXPLORE one of its top economic development priorities. II. CURRENT SITUATION: A. EXPLORE'S opening means jobs and business to Roanoke County and the region. B. EXPLORE has acquired roughly 1,300 acres of state park land, which will be served by a national parkway, the Roanoke River Parkway, and has raised over $28 million toward its goal. C. Roanoke County would like to assist EXPLORE to help it become a reality by 1994. D. River Foundation President Dr. Norman D. Fintel, will brief the Board of Supervisors on EXPLORE'S recent progress and proposed next steps. Bern Ewert, Project Director, and Richard Burrow, Engineer, will be available to answer questions. III. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: 1. Proceed with 456 review process for EXPLORE during the next year. 2. Establish an EXPLORE Citizen Advisory Committee to assist, as needed, in plan review process. W. E. BOOZE, JR., Chairman WANDA C. WINGO, Vice-Chairman R. E. LAYMAN, JR. G. C. THOMPSON, JR. H. E. WILHELM B~tetourt County Board of su~e--~,isors August 28, 1990 MEMO TO: Mr. Tommy Fuqua Mr. Sam Smelser FROM: Mr. John B. Williamson, III ~~~ ~~ Count Adm ~~ ~~~~ Y nistrator ,li~ln~ SUBJECT: Mutual Aid Agreement '~ ~! ~`. JOHN B. WILLIAMSON, III CGUNTY ADMINISTRATOR PHONE (703) 473.8223 FAX (703)992.8207 t WEST MAIN STREET-BOX 1 FINCASTLE, VIRGINIA 24090 Enclosed please find a copy of the mutual aid agree- ment between the Blue Ridge Volunteer Fire Department, Roanoke County, and Botetourt County as approved by the Botetourt County Board of Supervisors on August 24, 1990. Please have this agreement formally approved b respective Boards. Once that a Y your made, Pproval has been formally please let me know, so that I may circulate copies .for original signatures by the involved parties. Thank you for your consideration in this regard. Enclosure cc: t~mer Hodqe, Roanoke County Administrator Mutual Aid Agreement file MUTUAL AID AGREENIEN'1' PROPOSAL This Agreement, made and entered into this ____ day of 1990, by and between the COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA, hereinafter referred to as Roanoke County, and the COUNTY OF' BOTETOURT, VIRGINIA, hereinafter referred to as Botetourt County, and TI{E BLUE RIDGE VOLUNTEEK b'IRE DEPARTMENT OF BOTE-' TOURT COUN'1'Y, VIRGINIA, INC., a Virginia Corporation, hereinafter referred to as the Blue Ridge Volunteer Fire Department. WITNESSE'1H WHEREAS, the Boards of Supervisors of Roanoke County and Botetourt County desire to provide the best and most cost-effective fire protection for their citizens; and, WHEREAS , Botetourt County owns f ir•e-fighting equipment used by the Blue Ridge Volunteer Fire Department; and, WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of both counties, and the Blue Ridge Volunteer Fire Department, have concurred in the effort to develop a mutual aid agreement for improved fire-fighting in Roanoke and Botetourt Counties, as authorized by Section 27-3 of the Code of Virginia; and, ~ WHEREAS, Section 27-3.1 of the Code of Virginia provides that cooperating) counties may procure or extend the necessary public liability insurance to 1, cover claims arising out of mutual aid agreements. '~ NOW, THLREFORE, for and in consideration of the undertakings hereinafter~l, set out, the parties covenant and agree as follows: 1. Mutual aid in fire-fi~htinK. a. Roanoke County Fire Department Station 12 (Read Mountain b'ire Sta- tion) will respond as a second due company to assist Blue Ridge to calls in the following areas: 1. a perimeter consisting of a circle drawn from the boundaries of: North - Laymantown Road to Rainbow Forest Drive East - U. S. Route 460 to the Blue Ridge Parkway West - Webster Road to State Route 607 (Bore Auger Road) 2. including the subdivisions of Knollwood, partial Rainbow Forest, Peachtree Valley, Stepping Stone, Rainbow Estates and Clearview Estates. b. Blue Ridge Volunteer Fire Department will respond as a second due company to assist Station 12 to calls in the following areas: 1. U. S. Route 460 (Challenger Drive) to the City limits and all C1-o4-o Rn~`ic inl-nrcartine Page 2 2. Assistance in nondesignated areas. Roanoke County and the Blue Ridge Volunteer Fire Department agree to re- spond when called to assist in the other areas not described in this Agree- !, ment, when the personnel and equipment can be safely spared. 3. Designation of officials. Roanoke County and the Blue Ridge Volunteer Fire Department shall respond to a call for service only upon request of the official designated for that purpose. The parties shall notify one another of the identity of the official or officials designated to request such assistance. 4 . Indenu~if ication. a. Roanoke County agrees to indemnify and hold harmless Botetourt County and Blue Ridge Volunteer Fire Department, their officials, officers, agents, employees and volunteers, from any and all claims, legal actions, and judg-I ments arising out of, or in the course of, the perforrnance of this Agreement. b. Botetourt County agrees to indemnify and hold harmless Roanoke County at~d its officials, officers, agents, and employees, from any and all claims, legal actions, and judgments arising out of, or in the course of, the per- forrnance of this Agreement. 5. Application of department policies. Officers, employees, agents, and volunteers shall comply with the opera- tional policies of their own department. The parties agree to hold the own officers, agents, employees, and volunteers, respectively, responsible and accountable for compliance with operational policies of the employing depart- ment. 6. Retention of benefits. While acting under this Agreement, officers, agents, employees, and vol- unteers shall have all the inununities from liabilities and exemptions fron laws, ordinances, and regulations and shall have all the pension, relief, disability, workers' compensation, and other benefits enjoyed by them whi1E performing their respective duties within the territorial limits of the it political subdivision. 7. 'Liability for damaged equipment. Roanoke County shall have no liability for any destruction, loss or dam age of any Botetourt County-owned or Blue Ridge Volunteer Fire Department owned motor vehicle, equipment, or personal property and Botetourt County ari -. - ~ _L _ ~ i L~.... ~... 1 ~ .,b.y 1 y ~v Fnr arlV ftPS~.('i]C Page 3 8. Minimum training standards. The Blue Ridge Volunteer Fire Department agrees to adhere to Roanoke County minimum training standards. 9. Immunities not impaired hereby. This Agreement shall not be construed to impair or affect any sovereign or governmental immunity or official immunity that may otherwise be available to Roanoke County or any officer, agent, or employee of Roanoke County, or tc Botetourt County or any officer, agent, or employee of Botetourt County. 10. Commencement of agreement. This Agreement shall become effective on 11. Termination of agreement. Any party to this Agreement may terminate same, with or without cause, by giving written notice to the other parties by certified mail, return re- ceipt requested. any termination notice must be given at least sixty (60) days prior to July 1st of any given year. This Agreement shall continue from year to year unless terminated as indicated above, or all parties mutually agree to terminate. 12. Entire agreement. This Agreement represents the entire and integrated agreement between the parties and supersedes all prior negotiations, representations, or agree- ments, either oral or written. This Agreement may be amended only by written instrument signed by authorized representatives of all parties. In witness whereof, the parties have executed this Agreement the day and year first above written. COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA By County Administrator Attest: Deputy Clerk COUNTY OF BOTETOURT, VIRGINIA Page 4 BLUE RIDGE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT OF' BOTETOURT COUNTY INC. Attest: By Chief ROANOKE COUNTY FIRE AND RESCUE DEPAR'1'MENT BY. Chief Attest: ~ -~s W. E. BOOZE, JR., Chairman WANDA C. WINGO, Vice-Chairman R. E. LAYMAN, JR. G. C. THOMPSON, JR. H. E. WILHELM Botetourt county Board of $u~ervisors JOHN 8. WILLIAMSON, III COUNTY ApMINISTRATOR PHONE (703) 6738223 FAx p03~ oez~ezo7 1 WEST MAIN STREET~BOJC 1 FINCASTLE, VIRGINIA 24080 MEMO T0: Blue Ridge Volunteer Fire Department ~Yommy Fugua, Roanoke County Fire Chief William L. Heartwell, III, County Attorney FROM: John B. Williamson, County Administrators/ ~~ SUBJECT: Mutual Aid Agreement DATE: July 16, 1990 ;, On June 11, 1990 I forwarded to you copies of a draft mutual aid agreement with a request for revisions or comments by July 10, 1990. Mr. Heartwell, County Attorney, responded that the draft was acceptable as written. Having not heard from anyone else, I assume the draft is acceptable to the Blue Ridge Volunteer Fire Department and Roanoke County. The agreement is scheduled for approval by the Botetourt County Board of Supervisors at its regular August meeting. Please take the necessary steps to have the agreement approved by your respective organizations. Thank you. cc: Wanda Wingo Elmer C. Hodge Mutual Aid file W. E. BOOZE, JR., Chairman WANDA C. WINGO, Vice-Chairman R. E. LAYMAN, JR. G. C. THOMPSON, JR. H. E. WILHELM Botetourt cagy Board of $uiiervisors June 11, 1990 MEMO TO: Blue Ridge Volunteer Fire Department William L. Heartwell, IIi, Count Attorney ~T~cSmmy Fuqua, Roanoke County Fire Chief FROM: John B. Williamson, III County Administrator SUBJECT: Mutual Aid Agreement JOHN B. WILLIAMSON, III COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR PHONE (703) 473.8223 FAX (703)992-8207 1 WEST MAIN STREET-BOX 1 FINCASTLE, VIRQINIA 24090 Attached please find a draft mutual aid agreement between Blue Ridge Volunteer Fire Department, Botetourt County and Roanoke County. The draft is modeled after a similar mutual aid agreement with Troutville Volunteer Fire Department dated October 1, 1986, and approved by both Boards of Supervisors. Please review the draft and send me your suggested revisions by July 10, 1990. Thank you. Attachment cc: Mrs. Wanda C. Winqo, Board of Supervisors member Elmer C. Hodge, Roanoke County Administrator Mutual Aid file MUTUAL AID AGREEMENT PROPOSAL This Agreement, made and entered into this ~ ___ ___ day of ___ __, 1990, by and between the COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA, hereinafter referred to as Roanoke County, and the COUNTY OF BOTETOURT, VIRGINIA, hereinafter referred to as Botetourt County, and THE BLUE RIDGE VOLUN- TEER FIRE DEPARTMENT OF BOTETOURT COUNTY, VIRGINIA, INC., a Virginia Corporation, hereinafter referred to as the Blue Ridge Volunteer Fire Department. WITNESSETH WHEREAS, the Boards of Supervisors of Roanoke County and Botetourt County desire to provide the best and most cost-effective fire protection for their citizens; and, WHEREAS, Botetourt County owns fire-fighting equip- ment used by the Blue Ridge Volunteer Fire Department; and, WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of both counties, and the Blue Ridge Volunteer Fire Department, have con- curred in the effort to develop a mutual aid agreement for improved fire-fighting in Roanoke and Botetourt Coun- ties, as authorized by Section 27-3 of the Code of Vir- ginia; and, WHEREAS, Section 27-3.1 of the Code of Virginia pro- vides that cooperating counties may procure or extend the necessary public liability insurance to cover claims aris- ing out of mutual aid agreements. NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the un- dertakings hereinafter set out, the parties covenant and agree as follows: Page 2 1. Mutual aid in fire-f_i htin . a. Roanoke County Fire Department Station 12 (Read Mountain Fire Station) will respond as a second due com- pany to assist Blue Ridge to calls in the following areas: 1. a perimeter consisting of a circle drawn from the boundaries of: North - Laymantown Road to Rainbow Forest Drive East - U. S. Route 460 to the Blue Ridge Parkway West - Webster Road to State Route 607 (Bore Auger Road) 2. including the subdivisions of Knollwood, partial Rainbow Forest, Peachtree Valley, Stepping Stone, Rainbow Estates and Clear- view Estates. b. Blue Ridge Volunteer Fire Department will re- spond as a second due company to assist Station 12 to calls in the following areas: ~~ U. S. Route 460 (Challenger Drive) to the City limits and all State Roads intersecting with it including Bonsack Road, Carson Road, and State Route 604 to State Route 654. ~~ including the subdivisions of Little Tree Nursery Estates, LaBellevue, Hunt Ridge, Meadows of Trent and The Orchards. 2. Assistance in nondesignated areas. Roanoke County and the Blue Ridge Volunteer Fire De- partment agree to respond when called to assist in the other areas not described in this Agreement, when the per- sonnel and equipment can be safely spared. 3. Designation of officials. Roanoke County and the Blue Ridge Volunteer Fire De- partment shall respond to a call for service only upon Page 3 request of the official designated for that purpose. The parties shall notify one another of the identity of the official or officials designated to request such assis- tance. 4. Indemnification. a. Roanoke County agrees to indemnify and hold harm- less Botetourt County and Blue Ridge Volunteer Fire De- partment, their officials, officers, agents, employees and volunteers, from any and all claims, legal actions, and judgments arising out of, or in the course of, the per- formance of this Agreement. b. Botetourt County agrees to indemnify and hold harmless Roanoke County and its officials, officers, agents, and employees, from any and all claims, legal actions, and judgments arising out of, or in the course of, the performance of this Agreement. 5. Application of department policies. Officers, employees, agents, and volunteers shall comply with the operational policies of their own depart- ment. The parties agree to hold the own officers, agents, employees, and volunteers, respectively, responsible and accountable for compliance with operational policies of the employing department. 6. Retention of benefits. While acting under this Agreement, officers, agents, employees, and volunteers shall have all the immunities from liabilities and exemptions from laws, ordinances, and regulations and shall have all the pension, relief, disability, workers' compensation, and other benefits en- joyed by them while performing their respective duties within the territorial limits of their political subdivi- sion. Page 4 7. Liability for dama~d equipment. Roanoke County shall have no liability for any des- truction, loss or damage of any Botetourt County-owned or Blue Ridge Volunteer Fire Department-owned motor vehicle, equipment, or personal property and Botetourt County and Blue Ridge Volunteer Fire Department shall have no liabil- ity for any destruction, loss, or damage of any Roanoke County-owned motor vehicle, equipment, or personal prop- erty in the exercise of any power under or pursuant to this Agreement. 8. Minimum trainins standards. The Blue Ridge Volunteer Fire Department agrees to adhere to Roanoke County minimum training standards. 9. Immunities not impaired here. This Agreement shall not be construed to impair or affect any sovereign or governmental immunity or official immunity that may otherwise be available to Roanoke County or any officer, agent, or employee of Roanoke County, or to Botetourt County or any officer, agent, or employee of Botetourt County. 10. Commencement of agreement. This Agreement shall become effective on 11. Termination of agreement. Any party to this Agreement may terminate same, with or without cause, by giving written notice to the other parties by certified mail, return receipt requested, any termination notice must be given at least sixty (60) days prior to July 1st of any given year. This Agreement shall continue from year to year unless terminated as .indicated above, or all parties mutually agree to terminate. Page 5 12. Entire agreement.. This Agreement represents the entire and integrated agreement between the parties and supersedes all prior negotiations, representations, or agreements, either oral or written. This Agreement may be amended only by writ- ten instrument signed by authorized representatives of all parties. In witness whereof, the parties have executed this Agreement the day and year first above written. COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA By County Administrator Attest: Deputy Clerk COUNTY OF BOTETOURT, VIRGINIA B1'---- --- - County Administrator Attest: Deputy Clerk BLUE RIDGE VOLUNTEER FIRE DE- PARTMENT OF BO'I'ETOURT COUNTY, INC. By Chief Attest: Page 6 ROANOKE COUNTY FIRE AND RESCUE DEPARTMENT B y__ Chief Attest: MUTUAL AID AGREEMEN'1 PROPOSAL of ' his Agreement , made and entered into this ~.-.-.----od einaf ter ref erred to T VIRGINIA, and between the COUNTY OF ROANOK~., VIKGIN"iA, hereinafter referred 1990, by as Roanoke County> and the COUNTY OF BOTE'iOURT, and THE BLUE RIDGE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTrLrefec'redl to to as Botetourt County a Virginia Corporation, hereinafte VIRGINIA, INC., TOURT COUN'iY, as the Blue Ridge Volunteer Fire Department. WITNESSETH and Botetourt County WHEREAS, the Boards of Supervisors of Roanoke County rotection for their sire to provide the best and most cost-effective fire p de and, kiting equipment used by the Blue citizens; WHEREAS, Botetourt County owns fire-fig artment; and, and the Blue Ridge Ridge Volunteer Fire Dep WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of both counties, a mutual ' e Department, have concurred in the eff an Botet urt Counties, Volunteer F'lr kiting in Roanoke roved fire-fig and, aid agreement for imp inia; Section 27-3 of tY~e Code of Virgnia provides that cooperating as authorized by WI{EKEAS, Section 27-3.1 of the Code of Virg il1surance to ublic liability rocure or extend the necessary p counties may p reements. out of mutual aid ag s hereinafter cover claims arising THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the undertaking NOW, ~~ set out, the parties covenant and agree as follows: 1. M„tual aid in fire-fi htin . nt Fire Department Station 12 (Redd Mountain Fire S a- a, Roanoke Cou Y to assist Blue Ridge to calls in tion) will respond as a second due company the following areas: imeter consisting of a circle drawn from the boundaries o : 1 a per antown Road to Rainbow Forest Drive North - Laym e parkway East - U. S. Route 460 to the Blue Ridg - Webster Road to State Route 607 (Bore Auger Road) West artial Rainbow Forest, 2, including the subdivisions of Knollwood, p e Valley, Stepping Stone, Rainbow Estates and Clearview Peachtre Estates. and as a second duel artment will resp b, Blue Ridge Volunteer Fire Dep areas: company to assist Station 12 to calls ~nrive)ftolthe City limits and all 1 U, S, Route 460 (Challenger D Page 2 2, Assistance in nondesi nated area . e Volunteer Fire Department agree to re- and the Blue Ridg ree- Roanoke County lied to assist in the other areas not descrd~bed in this g spond when ca s are ment, when the personnel and equipment can be safely P 3, Desi nation of officials. e volunteer Fire Department shall respond Roanoke County and the Blue Ridg 'ce only upon request of the official designated for that to a call for serve of the official ose. The parties shall notify one another of the identity purp or officials designated to request such asses ance p, Indemnification. and hold harmless Botetourt County a, Roanoke County agrees to indemnify officers, agents, artment, their officials, and Blue Ridge Volunteer Fire Dep legal actions, and judg-I from any and all claims, ees and volunteers, erformance of this Agreement. employ the p ments arising out of, or in the course of, ount agrees to indemnify and hold harmless Roanoke County b, Botetourt C Y to ees, from any and all claims, and its officials, officers, agents, and emp Y the per- and judgments arising out of , or in the course of , legal actions, formance of this Agreement. lication of de artment olicies. era-' 5' A and volunteers shall comply with the op em loyees, agents, Officers, P arties agree to hold the own tional policies of their own department. The P onsible and respectively, resp agents, employees, and volunteers, to in depart- officers, olicies of the emp Y g accountable for compliance with operational p ment. 6, Retention of benefits. a ents, employees, and vol-I While acting under this Agreement, officers, g ve all the immunities from liabilities and exemptions from ension, relief, unteers shall ha ordinances, and regulations and shall have all th o ed by them while laws' and other benefits enj Y disability, workers' compensation, respective duties within the territorial limits of their performing their political subdivision. 7, Liabilit for dama ed a ui ment. for any destruction, loss or dam- Roanoke County shall have no liability e Volunteer Fire Department- age of any Botetourt County-owned or Blue Ridg or personal property and Botetourt County and equipment, for any destruc- owned motor vehicle, ~_-....~mp„t shall have no liability -^^} Page 3 g, Minimum trainin standards. id e Volunteer Fire Department agrees to adhere to Roano e The Blue R g County minimum training standards. air or affect any sovereign 9 , I.imnunities not im aired here This Agreement shall not be construed to imp otherwise be available or official immunity that may to ee of Roanoke County, or to or governmental immunity or emp Y or any officer, agent, to Roanoke County or employee of Botetourt County• Botetourt County or any officer, agent, lp Commencement of a reement. This Agreement shall become effective on 11. Termination of a reement. terminate same, with or without cause,I arty to this Agreement Wray return re- Any p arties by certified mail, by giving written notice to the other p iven at least sixty (60) days ceipt requested. any termination notice must be g t of any given year. This Agreement shall continue from year or all parties mutually agree prior to July is to year unless terminated as indicated above, to terminate. 12. Enti=greement. rated agreement between reement represents the entire and intrepresentations, or agree- This Ag otiations, the parties and supersedes all prior neg b written be amended only Y This Agreement may menu , either oral or written• resentatives of all parties. instrument signed by authorized rep eof the parties have executed this Agreement the day and In witness whey year first above written. COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGTNIA By Attest: County Administrator Deputy Clerk VIRGINIA COUNTY OF BOTETOURT, Page 4 BLUE RIDGE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT OF BOTETOUKT COUN'LY, INC. By Chief Attest: ROANOKE COUNTY FIRE AND RESCUE DEPARTMENT By Chief Attest: w .~ ,~~ .~ ___ ~~ o ~ . _~~ ~ ~,~ 4:~s~~ ~ %k ~.-~ Education August 30, 1990 ~ Employment ( Health ) Housing and Homelessness Neighborhoods p Economic Development Crime Prevention 1 Roanoke County Board of Supervisors 3738 Brambleton Ave., SW Roanoke, Va. 24018-0798 Cabell Brand, ~ President Georgia Meadows, ~ Dear Gentlemen, Vice President Elizabeth Bowles, OuLr Transitional Livin Center Secretary g (T . L. C .) 1 S i Rev.EalyOgden, approaching its third year of operation. We have provided a Treasurer ' home, nutrition, case management, and much more for almost Monty Plymale, ~ 500 rsons . The T. L . C. now averages 60 residents daily, i Assistant ~ seeretaryirreasUrer including 30 families. More than 50% of our transitional residents (those who participate in the i program for more D. star Barnhill than 30 days) move into permanent housing, and 68 0 of John Berry employable T.L.C. residents become employed. Betty Carpenter Elmore Dennis The support of _loca_t governments and the citizens Bettie Epps ~ of the Roanoke Valley have contributed greatly to the Ted Feinour SUCCesS2S of the T . L . C . r y pp Joseph Gaither P ~r~- We sincere_l a reciate Jeanne Goddard ' Roanoke County's financial commitments to the project during Cleo xaray ~ our first two years . Zane Jones A. C. Jordan ~ We are now in the process of securing funds and xildaLarson ~ pledges to match the H.U.D. Supportive Housing Demonstration Betty Littleton Gertruae Logan Program award of $161, 727.00 for fiscal year 1990-91. The Rev. Edgar Mayse next year beer i.ns December 7_ , 1.990 , and we must document Norma Meeks match commitments by September 30, 1990. Dorothy Mendenhall A. W. Merrill The ma Orlt Rosa Miller j y of T.L.C. participants - 95% - are Meredith L. Mills natives of the Roanoke Valley or persons who have lived here Lewis Nelson j most of their lives. Eloise Pack Lewis Peery We will need approximately $410,000.00 during Larry Renfroe Rev. James w. Reynolds FY 90-91 to operate the T. L . C. at the maximum level of Ma]ikaShakoor ! services. Again, we are asking Roanoke County and other William sparrow I local governments to support the project by supplying Elizabeth stokes I matching funds for the H.U.D. award. Specifically, we ask w. D.wara f that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors appro riate Charles L. Watson i p $15,000 (90 of needed match funds) for Transitional Living Center operations for 1990-91. I am enclosing a T.L.C. Post OfficeBox2868 j funding plan for the next year for your further information. Roanoke, Virginia ~ We would welcome the opportunity to present this request to 24001-2868 i the Board at their earliest convenience. (703) 345-6781 I Fax (703)345-4461 ~ On behalf of the T.A.P. Board, our staff, and especially our participants, I thank you for your service to our citizens, and your support of this vital program. Very truly yours, ~~ ~ J C. ~ ~;~; cam. . ~ it ~ Theodore J. Edlic~, III Executive Director, T.A.P. TJE:fp Enclosure TAP Transitional Living Center Funding plan 1990-91 Total need: $410,000 (to house and feed up to 75 persons, 24 hours per day, 365 days providing case management, employment and housing counseling, and other supportive services.) Match needed to receive H.U.D. award of $161,727.00: Requests of local governments: Roanoke City 40,000 Roanoke County 15,000 City of Salem 8,000 Botetourt County 2,000 Total 65,000 TAP Private fundraising; received/pledged as of 8/20/90: State SESSP 90-91 United Way campaign Other non federal funds needed to meet match H.U.D. Award: Other funds needed to meet 90-91 budget: 30,000 15,546 30,000 (T.L.C. commitment based on successful campaign) 21,454 162,000 Total anticipated match 161,727 323,727 86,273 410,000 7-~ T H E RIVER. ~~ FOUNDATION March 28, 1990 Mr. Elmer Hodge County Administrator County of Roanoke P. 0. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 Dear Elmer: It was nice talking with you last week. ]= - 3-2`~- 10 ~~'- ,~ ~o 1~ /~ As we discussed, ~ - .. after we have updated Terry Harrington and the Planning Commission. In regard to the budget, $250,000 is needed for engineering work on providing sewer to the. Explore Park site. Richard Burrow would be able to elaborate on that if you need detail. When you have time, maybe in May, we would like to take you to the actual Blue Ridge Town site and perhaps part of the Wilderness Park across the river. It takes a good two hours to do a walk-through, and you would need to wear walking boots. Let me know. Thank you for following up on the budget request for sewer. If you have any questions, please call me or Richard. Sincerely, az~ ~~• ~~,-~ Jo W. Waugh ~ic Information Officer ~~~ ~, Property Manager i 3w L- ~ Z,~, ---- Hoke, Virginia 24011 (703)345-12Q5 i i w N n{V ~ .;,k ,~yr~'~ ~..3 6 ~,(~~, f .rte, s~S~iJd6;~:~t7~H~~~,. ~ 4 B~~~nfv!Se~rnn~ns ~ -. ` J M~3 .~Z „~ v _\\ ```` +"a~' R 3 ''~ 4b ~~ 3. rV 111 ~ . 7?+' a r ~• ?'''.:`~~~0~;~~ 'OLJN',T.'Y BOA_~'~ OF SUPERVISORS A~ ':~`3DA JA~'d`€.`'~'?Y 23, 1990 Welcome to the Ro<-,.noke County Board of Supervisors meeting. Regular meetings are ~Ze_1_d on the second ".I"uesday and the fourth Tuesday at 3:OC p.m. Pu:~lic hearincs are held at 7:00 fourth Tuesday ref each month. Deviations from this scheduleowille be announced. A. OPENING CEP.~ONIES (3:00 P.M.) 1. Roll Call. 2 • I~?vtc;~`-a.~n: John Chambliss Assist~~.~t County Administrator 3. Pledge of Allegian::::~ to the United States ^lag. B. REQUESTS 1`O PC?STPONE, AD'_` "'O, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITS <S C. Pk!~^`.~~~".ATIONS, R~'SOLdJTY',~,,5, RECOGNITIONS, AI~TD 1~~~?ARDS D. NE4d '~U~`_~"?rtESS 1. Approval of e:=.Y'_J ret~.-~~~n„ent plan for ~~F.rsorl~el in ``'~ ~ Fire and ~?escue ''epartment, Sher ~.~d z s Departmen'~~ ~:c riid Police ~~-y~ ~ rtment . 2. 1990 ;'~cano'~te Valley-?northern Virginia Economic Bridge, Fraject. 190-7 Pta~~'_~.~ Hearin °~;~ elicit .~,-:"ten or ors' for i`_e~s to ?~~ n~-. ~ °, = ~, ~._ ca~nrnents f1SC~~. ~'ed~-. - `~°~'`~d _ ~ --he ~aud~et f=or 1990-91 190-8 ~'ublic Her rAng for wr" ~~ *en or oral comment concerning th,e Esta'~. _ ~~~~~ent of the SiX-year i'ons`ruction F?.an f< :~~ .: secondary system cf the ~'~ ~~~ Highways .for F'isca~ v ear 199~J-1996. 190-9 Rublic Hearing any' approva of resolution vuPPo'"tina the desig^a~:~.c~ of property of Roano'~ce Rebos T~~ __~s exe~o~ ~-~,~, taxation by the ~e~eral Assembly of '.%i rgin.'.7.. 190-10 Pub<_c Hearing ~'or citizen comment for the Treasurer to is~-ue up to ~9 million Revenue Antici ation I`to~F~~. for cash flow purposes and the adoption of a resolution approving the borro~zing. ' 190-11 Petition of Frank and 'ria the Zoning ,~ ¢,, ~--rY E--_Radford to appeal Adminis Lra,,,... s nte~~-~q-etation of Prof:"Ars pe.r*a ~.n~.rq t'o ~~he •-; ~crnacle on tau=o parcels: a• c-e located at the nor*heasterly corner of Peters Creek Road a^!' tr'oodhaven Drive, Hollins Magist~ria~_ b;;istrict. '~. one iocate~' at ±~~ northeast corner of Glen Heather.rive anc'"• ~^o~~~ve 419, Windsor Hi11s Magisteria? DistY cr`~:. S • CITIZENS' CpMMENTS AND ~'DMMLTIdICATIONS T . A~.ZOURNME~~i"" ~~,^ ~ _ . To: Twee ~. ~~~dv, Surie°-visor '~7ind~;or .._,__~_:_s TJistrict ~ ! -~ ~ r FROM: Joseph B. G~~-ishain ,fur"~~ ~~. Senior As~:~'_.; .ant Courty~ttc~~rne~a~ J DATE: January 19, 1990 SUBJECT: Roanoke Rebos, Inc. Request for ,vax exemption In the course of gathering °:he necessary information and preparing the paperw®rk in connPc'ion with Roanoke Rebos, Inc. request for tax exempt status, I discovered that the General Assembly changed the ground rules last year on how they will handle these applications. Beginning this year, all bills which would grant exem~~+~ion from `axL.~'vion pursu< rt to Article X, Section 6 (a) (6) of the Constitat__on n f Virginia th~~ provision F.oanoke Rebos is relying upon) mus:- be i z'ltrt3ducr~d on vhe first day of the session, unless a specLal request «s made by the Governor. See, Section 30-19.1:2, Mode r~ Virginia, 1950, as amended. Although I think it ~.s approprir;;;~e 1=cr the Board of Supervisors to proceed to take the necessary action of adopt~_ng ~. resolution supporting this exemption request at this ~~i~ne, I :,, _~. °~~~w you to be aware that the legislature would not be ab~.e to ac'. ~.~>~ this matter until nF3xt year. /7bo cc: Jo'~n H. Turner, Jr. R. Wayne Compton Elmer C. HG?r.ne Rid A.+Vi~. ' C F ~ G ~ a+ 1~ J`, 1 .=~+,~s` is ~ '~ '~~ . r, ni.,~: SFSQ"1~CENTENN~aV it N,enuti~ul8c~inriirr~; PAUL M. MAHCiNEY COUNTY AlTORNEV ~ ~ aO;S~C ~"~, ~,~,' ,~ d7" ~!"# ~a' "A~F TEA CI?Y «' ~ dw '07s ~ v 197 c~Fl-;~~~ of Tr ~~ c~~:_~w-rv .nn otl~F.Y t9~9 10 January c• < JOSEPH B. OBFNSHAIN SENIOR ASSSTANT COUNTY ATTi:iRNEY V'.CK!E L HUFFMAN ASSI;T.vNT COUNT"Y ATTORNEY Mr. John H. Turner Jr. Treasurer, Roanoke Rebos Inc. 4231 Garst Mili Road Roanoke, Va. 240?S Re: Resolution supporting tax-exempt status, Board of Supervisors Dear Mr. Turner: Supervisor Lee Eddy has indicated that he is wiling to introduce a resolution requesting the General Assembly to grant tax-exempt status to thr~-: property of .'?oanoke Rebos in Roanoke County. The Board gas indicated its willingness to consider this matter on its January 23 agenda as the next :ay is the last day for introduction of bills at this session o~ t'~.e legislature. By next Wednesday, I need to have drafted a res+~lution and a board report on this matter to be dis~:r_ibuted to the Supervisors before the meeting on the 23rd. Ir, order to do so, I r°:eed some information fro. you in order to sa,~~.-? ~. ~y .`he statutory mandate of Sec~:ion 30-19.04 z- which re(~uires ~~:~.e 3oard of Supe.rvvirors to consider the following factors before acopt~ng a resolution it this situation: (1) Whether tr, organization is F::~cemo~: from taxation pursuant to Section 5t~y (c) of :he Znterna? ~': ~ven;~e Code of 195=.'~. (2) Whether a current annual alcchc'.~_c beverage license for serving alceho~. ~c be<~~ ~; r~s has ° 6 ~_~ issued ~y the Alccsholic Beverage C. n.tru? Boar~.~ ;o ~;u.ch ono ~ _' .ration, for use c~ such prope~-~~-y • (3) W~.ether art:; director or off~~-er of t'~e organizi-~t_~~n ~;~ paid comp:=vnsation in excesC af_ ;~~asonr b r~ allos~r_3~,r-e ¢~,~y- sa'_aries or o~_.?~er c;~~nensati~.~_ ~oY, p"~'~'''ti r.~ ser~~P :yes x~r?-1i c~ such dire or or o{:f~c;n~. ,~r _~ally ~°e~~ - - (4) Whr~ther any wart of the net earniw~g.- of such orr.~nization inures to the benefit of any indiv~~=~=.~~~;.` , and r~- - ~~.~er an signi ficart portion iaf the sere°:~ces pr~wided by suc;:. carganiza~ tion is generated bs~ funds .rec~~_.ved from donations, P.O. BC?X 29800 c"> "~~ANOKE COUNTY, VIRGIN ~, 2 4018-07 9 8 (703) 772-2007 Page e ~_0 Jan°.~:.~ry 1~~0 contributions or ' ocal, :Mate or f~c'.eral grants. As used. in this s~.:'.=sect:~on ,, donations, e ' ? '_~ac.'_L:de the pro` c T.nc~ of personal services c>r the co° ~ _~_-: ~.t~_on ;-~~' in k~~~'. or o :he~° material services. ~~ (5) Whether the organization provn~_des services for the common good of the public. (6) Whether a substantial part of the activities of the organiza- tion involves carrying on propaganda, or otherwise attempting to influence legislation and whether the arganization participates in, cr intervenes i_r~, ,any political campaign on behalf of any candidate for pLbl.c o:~fice. (7) No rule, regulation, policy, or practice of the organization discriminate` 03~ the bas~..~ of religious conviction, race, sex or national origin. (8) Any other criter~.-~_, facts and circumstances which the governing borer dee:~z~~ pertinent to the adoption of such resolutJon. You and perhaps the other officers. of Roanoke Rebos should plan on being present at the Board of Supervisors meeting on January 23 in order to ~;~~ ~;wc~r any questions which the Board members might have about your organiza`~'on and its property. S.~_o:ald you have any questo~ in the a~eant-'~ae, ple{~se feel free to contact me at the above ~.~c'.r~~cs. I look forwarc. to receiving this information from yon.. cc: Lee B. Ec~c'r~~ E? ~rer C. Hodge C. Wayne Compton /jbo Si~cere~_y you ~~, _ ~~ 3o~i:.~~~~~. ~d Ob~rrs ain, .~::sq. 5~;~;~.or Assistant County At'~orney i' i f U MEMO - t ~g~ ~: n To: Supervaso~s, Elme- H~c~ge, °a;zl ija.hone~~, 'r7ayne Co~Y'-.on From: .Lee B. ~~~. ~~, ~` Subj(~r~~: Req~~er f _cr T~. ~^~^t_on from .~'ea.l Estate Taxes Roazo'<~e Reba:-;, Inc. , 4.21 Garst Mil~_ Road, Roanoke 24C18 Today I was v~.sited by Mr. John ~~. Tur~:e.u, Jr. , treasurer of Roanoke Re;;os, Inc., who asked that the Board of Supervisors approve a resolution requesting tax-exempt status foy their property in the Windsor :ills d.._;trict. This is the former Steele resicence located on the west side of Gar ;t Mill Road between the Sans Souci Apartar.ents and ?'arst Mill Park (adjacent to the old silo>. Mr. Turner reported that previous discussions with C'~i^ Woodrum, Joe Obenshain, anal Wayne Compton. indicated that a request for tax-exempt status must be initiated by a resolution of the local governing body before being considered by th.e General Assembly. The cut-off date for introducing such a bile to the 1990 General Assembly is approximately January 24. Roanoke Rebos, Inc, is a Roanoke-based organization whose primary purpose is to provide meeting spare and personnel support for recovering alcoh-]lies in this area. Their income is derived from dues and donations. They are tax exempt under federal law. They hold approximately 10 AA meetings each. week. A manager lives full time in the house. Existing parking can accoirunodate approximately 60 cars, enough so that mem.'~ers do not have to par'; elsewhere on neighborhood streets=, Mr. Turner was not aware of any compl~~.±.nts from the ne~ghbors. Dick Robers is generally aware of this matter. At the January 9 Board meeting I intend to ask that an a*~pro~~riate resolution be prepared, fo.~ formal consideration a.t tZe January 2~ meeti~^g, requesting the General Assembly to grant an exemption to the payment of real estate taxes for this organization at the Gar_st Mill Road ? oLation. If you a}prove, T will ask st off to send copies :_;f the January ~ action to our r~ap.resentatives in the General Assembly for ~~ e it ac.,ranc-~ i~afor,°~ tic:.. If ap?aroval is granted on January 23, _I recommend twat exer_ut~d cc~piec~ o`- the resolution '~,~-~ "far:ec~~° to '"he appropriate members of ¢ f c:"-eneral Assembly. I will b~~ glad to respond to any that Mr. Turner will be hasp;spy to the January n:°~ .~eeti n~. ~°uest.'ons you may '.ave, r°m sure be p=resent to ans~~~l- °~- c~~~estion at cc: Mr. Johz~ H. Turner, ~~r.