Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout10/23/1990 - Regular~N F ~ 9 z 18 L1 88 +ESOUICENTEM~~' ~ e~.w.N~e.,~~„~R (~nuntJ of ±Ra~ttnl;e ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ACTION AGENDA OCTOBER 23, 1990 Cad ~u•ua~iu utt 1~1 ~~9~8~9 Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meeting. Regular meetings are held on the second Tuesday and the fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public hearings are held at 7:00 p.m on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.) 1. Roll Call AT 3:05 P.M. ALL MEMBERS PRESENT 2. Irnocation: The Reverend Michael Meloy Windsor Hills United Methodist Church 3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag. B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS HCN MOTION TO POSTPONE 1090-2 AND 1090-3 TO ALLOW PLANNING STAFF AND PETITIONERS TO MEET WITH CITIZENS IN ARFA - URC ECH ADDED ITEM D-7, AMENDMENT TO PARKS AND RECREATION POLICY REGARDING YOUTH ATHI,ETICS i C. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS, AND AWARDS 1. Resolution of Congratulations to Roland E. Cook Elementary School upon its 75th anniversary R-102390-1 HCN MOTION TO ADOPT RESO - URC PRINCIPAL RON WEAVER AND DR WILSON PRESENT 2. Recognition of Kozaburo Ishikawa from the Japanese Local Government Center in New York INTRODUCED BY DON MYERS - THANI~D ROANOKE CO. FOR HOSTING PLANNER FROM JAPAN D. NEW BUSINESS 1. Resolution of Support for Virginia Tech's irnolvement in the Hotel Roanoke/Conference Center Project. R-102390-2 BLS MOTION TO ADOPT RESO URC 2. Appropriation of funds to cover the loss of state grant funds for the arts. A-102390-3 HCN MOTION TO DENY FUNDS AYES-HCN, SAM NAYS-LBE, BLJ,RWR s RWR MOTION TO GRANT FUNDS URC 3. Authorization to upgrade Computer Aided Dispatch System for police, fire and rescue. A-102390-4 HCN MOTION TO APPROVE URC 4. Approval of Legislative Program. A-102390-5 LBE MOTION TO LIlVIIT ASSESSMENT INCREASE FACH YEAR - DEFFATED 4 TO 1 VOICE VOTE LBE MOTION TO REQUEST LIMITATION IN AUTHORITY OF COURTS TO OVERTURN ZONING DECISION -APPROVED IJW LBE MOTION TO ALLOW LOCAL AUTHORITY TO TAX BINGO PROFITS -APPROVED 4-1 VOICE VOTE LBE MOTION TO APPROVE I,EGISIATIVE PROGRAM WITH TWO ADDITIONS APPROVED BY BOARD MEMBERS AND DELETION OF AUTHORIZATION FOR ANIMAL CONTROL VEHICLES TO BE EQUIPED WITH FLASHING LIGHTS AYES - I. B E, S A M, B L,T, R W R NAYS-HCN 5. Recommendation on Regional Airport Commission membership. A-102390-6 HCN MOTION TO APPROVE STAFF RECONIlVIENDATION URC 6. Memorandum of Understanding regarding assignment of 3 School personnel, Consolidation Agreement HCN MOTION TO TABLE -RULED OUT OF ORDER BY PMM, NO MAIN MOTION ON THE FLOOR HCN MOTION TO STRIKE ITEM D-6 FROM AGENDA - NO VOTE HCN SUBSTITUTE MOTION TO TABLE AYES-LBE,SAM,BL~T,HCN NAYS-RWR 7. Approval of Amendment to Parks and Recreation Policy regarding participation in Youth Athletics Program R-102390-7 HCN MOTION TO ADOPT RESO URC E. REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS NONE F. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC I~IEARINGS NONE G. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING FOR REZONING ORDINANCE -CONSENT AGENDA NONE H. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance at the request of Roanoke Gas Company to share a County water line easement. HCN MOTION TO APPROVE 1ST READING 4 2ND - 11/13/90 URC I. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES NONE J. APPOIlVTMENTS 1. Board of Zoning Appeals 2. Building Code Board of Adjustments and Appeals 3. Explore Advisory Committee HCN NOMINATED TRIXIE AVERILL FROM NORTH SIDE OF RIVER HCN NONffi~'~TED JAMES L. TROUT FROM SOUTH SIDE OF RIVER DEADLINE ESTABLISHED OF 11/13 TO APPOINT MEMBERS 4. Grievance Panel 5. Recycling Advisory Committee BI.J NOMINATED LBE TO REPRESENT BOARD OF SUPERVISORS LBE ASKED THAT RWR AND SAM APPOINT SOMEONE -DECLINED. DEADLINE ESTABLISHED OF 11/13 TO APPOINT MEMBERS K. CONSENT AGENDA ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROIJTIlVE AND i%r~.L BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WII.L BE CONSIDERED 5 SEPARATELY. R-102390-8 B TO APPROVE WITH I'T`EM #5 REMOVED FOR DISCUSSION URC 1. Approval of Minutes - September 25, 1990, October 9, 1990 2. Confirmation of Committee Appointments to the Explore Advisory Committee. A-102390-8.a 3. Request for acceptance of Mill Pond Drive and Kingsmill Drive into the VDOT Secondary System. R-102390-8.6 4. Acceptance of water and sanitary sewer facilities serving Heather Park. A-102390-8.c 5. Resolution of support for a direct highway connection between Va. Tech and I-81 R-102390-8.d LBE EXPRESSED CONCERN ABOUT FUNDING PRIORITIES FOR THIS PROJECT BLJ MOTION TO ADOPT RESO AYES-SAM,BL,T,HCN,RWR ABSTAIN-LBE 6. Request to increase Petty Cash for Youth Haven II. A-102390-8.e 6 7. Donation of drainage easement from Norma Jean and Glenda Gale Holbrook. , A-102390-8.f L REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS SUPERVISOR EDDY: (1): EXPRESSED GRAITTUDE AND WELCOMED ALLIED SIGNAL WHO WH.L BE LOCATING IN ROANOKE COUNTY. (2) EXPLAINED RIBBON HE AND RWR WERE VV:EARING WAS TO RECOGNIZE DRUG FREE YOUTH PROGRAMS. (3) WII.L BE MEETING WITH CITIZENS FROM 730 - 9:00 P.M. NEXT WEEK TO ANSWER QUESTIONS REGARDING CONSOLIDATION AGREEMENT. (4) CORRECTED RUMOR BEING CIRCULATED REGARDING HIS MEMO CONCERNING LETTER FROM MAYOR OF SALEM AND ASKING FOR RESPONSE FROM ROANOKE COUNTY REGARDING 2ND, VOTE OPTION -WAS NOT SUGGESTING CHANGED BOUNDARY LINES FOR THE 2ND VOTE. SUPERVISOR TOHNSON: ANNOUNCED THAT THE AIRPORT CONIlVIISSION HAS RECEIVED A PROPOSAL TO USE AIRPORT PROPERTY FOR SOCCER FACILITY. ASKED CLERK TO SET UP PRESENTATION FOR NEXT BOARD MEETING - 11/13/90 SUPERVISOR MCGRAW: (1) VACO SEARCH COINIlIRI'ITEE WII.L MEET THURSDAY, 10/25/90 TO MAKE FINAL RECOA~IlViENDATION - 4 FINAL CANDIDATES. (2) TIIA1vI~D DEL. RICHARD CP;A-NWELL FOR SETTING UP MEETING FOR BLUE RIDGE REGION - 110 PARTICIPATED. (3) REMINDED THAT BOARD HAS VOTE HAS NOT BEEN TAKEN ON REZONING FOR ALLIED SIGNAL. (4) FELT 2ND VOTE IN CONSOLIDATION FOR CATAWBA CITIZENS WAS NIEpiNINGLESS WITHOUT AGREEMENT WITH SALEM ON COST. SUPERVISOR ROBERS: STATED $16 MILLION AND MORATORIUM OFFER IS STILL ON THE TABLE REGARDING 2ND VOTE FOR CATAWBA TO JOIN SALEM. IF NO AGREEMENT, COULD POSSIBLY NEGOTIATE AFTER THE CONSOLIDATION VOTE. M. CITIZENS' COMII+IENTS AND COl\~IlVILTNICATIONS 1. Pat Dalton to speak concerning "No Left Turn" signs onto Mudlick Road in the City of Roanoke. DID NOT SPEAK -WORKING WITH ROANOKE CITY OFFICIALS 2. Rich Boehler, 314C Honeywood Lane S. W. asked for assistance from Roanoke County in expanding the services of CORTRAN and RADAR, expanding hours of transit from Mon. -Fri. till 6:15. STAFF TO BRING BACK REPORT ON 11/13/90. SAM SUGGESTED REQUESTING CORPORATE AND PRIVATE DONATIONS. 3. Marielayna Rossillo, Community Advocate for disabled, SPOKE IN SUPPORT OF MR. BIEHLER'S REQUEST 4. Lee Blair,7713 Old Mill Forest, Co-chairman of CARE, THAIVI~D RWR FOR HIS SUPPORT OF CONSOLIDATION. THAIVI~D LBE FOR SETTING UP MEETINGS REGARDING CONSOLIDATION. 4. Becky Fariss, 5123 Crossbow Circle, SPOKE IN SUPPORT OF MEMO OF UNDERSTANDING REGARDING SCHOOL TEACHERS ASSIGNMENTS IF CONSOLIDATION PASSES. N. REPORTS s HCN MOTION TO RECEIVE AND FILE - UW 1. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance 2. General Fund Unappropriated Balance 3. Board Contingency Fund 4. Analysis of Income and Expense for the three months ended September 30, 1990. O. ]E~CUTIVE SESSION pursuant to the Code of Virginia section 2.1-344 A (7) for consultation with legal counsel regarding the settlement negotiations with City of Salem. LBE MOTION AT 5:03 AYES-I,BE,BI,~,HCN NAYS-SAM,RWR P. CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE SESSION R-102390-9 HCN MOTION AT 5:20 P.M. RESPONSE TO CITY OF SALEM HCN MOTION TO SEND CO1bIlVIUNICATION TO TALIFERRO DECLINING THEIR OFFER OF JULY 10, 1990. URC EVENING SESSION (7:00 P.M. Q. PUBLIC HEARINGS 9 1090-1 Public Hearing and adoption of resolution supporting tax exemption of property awned by Roanoke Rebos and used for charitable and benevolent purposes on a nonprofit basis. R-102390-10 LBE MOTION TO ADOPT RESO URC R. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1090-2 An ordinance to rezone 1.301 acres from R-1 to R-3 to allow apartments, located on Feather Road at VA 24, Vinton Magisterial District, upon the petition of W. E. Cundiff. POSTPONED BY HCN MOTION TO MEET WITH CITIZENS 1090-3 An ordinance to rezone 12.3 acres from R-1 to R-E to allow a golf course, located along Wolf Creek between Hardy Road and VA 24, Vinton Magisterial District, upon the petition of Steve Brown. POSTPONED BY HCN MOTION TO MEET WITH CITIZENS 1090-4 An ordinance to rezone approximately 125 acres from M- 1 to M-2 and amend the Future Land Use Plan map designation of approximately 175 acres from Development to Principal Industrial to allow industrial development, located south of the intersection of US 11/460 (West Main Street) and Route 612 (Barley Drive) and adjacent to and west of the N&W Railway, Catawba Magisterial io Zt HO~SOddO ~ ~IOdS SI~I~'LLLI~ ~' ~~n ~~a of uolzo~ ~a~ £i-06£ZOI-O (0661 `sz x~~~.Ld~s ~ox~ a~1~O~) •sa~eiaoss~ poo,~n~uiads ~o ~sanba.~ aye uodn ~~ai~~siQ leiaa~si~ey~ slliH aospui~ 'anuan~ uo~alquieag SiS~ ~e pa~eaol ~enopui,~ nays-aniap lie~a.~ a ~an.~~suoa o~ ~saaae SZ'Z uo suoi~ipuoa paaa~oad ay; puau.~e o~ aaueuip~o u~ 9-0601 OI~III~iOZ~I 30 Z2IOdd11S III ~IOdS S1~I~ZI.LI~ S ~$'I-SA~I 2IAA2I`rI~H`I'Ig`L1I~S-S~~ S~2I~~ L9Z't~ O1~II.[~IOZ~2I OZ aI~I~ (I2I0 ZdOa~ OZ I~tOI.LOLII L1t~S Zi-06£ZOI-O ~066i `SZ 2I~gNi~.Ld~S Y1IO2i3 a~[11I~II.LISO~) •.~apuexal~ •O ~aeZ 30 ;sanba.~ ay; uodn ~ai~;sia leiaa;si~ey~ eq~+e~e~ ay; ui aniaQ ~aileA egMe~e~ uo pa~eaol a~e.~o~s ~uamdinba pue aai~o ao~aea~uoa a ~ana~suoa o~ ~ui~n~ae~nuey~ Z-y~ o~ lei;uapisag ~ uioa~ sa.~ae S£'L $uiuoza.~ aaueuip.~o u~ S-060i 'S~~a 0£ I~II.IAA O~ ~ ru s~.x~als~x xilnc~ o~~ an ins of ~xo1s a~ ~xols a~~ snos~ rix~~uo~ a~ss~x~~ su~z~ z ~xn axo J,aoa~ of uoLto~ ~s II-06£ZOI-O '~iaoy~n~ ~uatudolanaQ leia~snpuI aq~ ~o uoi~i~ad aye uodn `~ai.~~siQ leiaa~si~ey~ egnne~e~ `~enniie?I AAaSI~t ay; ~o ;sang pue o~ ECH TO V'VRITE VDOT REQUESTING THAT TIDY NOT APPROVE ENTRANCES IN ROANOKE COUN'T'Y UNTIL AFTER DISCUSSION WITH COUNTY STAFF 1090-7 Ordinance requesting vacation of approximately 250 feet of an existing 20 foot wide sanitary sewer easement shown on construction plans for Edinburgh Green addition 0-102390-14 HCN MOTION TO ADOPT ORD URC S. CITIZENS' CONIlVIENTS AND CONIlVITJ1vICATIONS 1. Beverly Portor, 6529 Fairway Forest Drive. POINTED OUT THAT COUNTY EMPLOYEES HAVE INCREASED IN FIVE YEARS. SUGGESTED CONSOLIDATION COULD REDUCE THE INCREASE. T. ADJOURNMENT HCN MOTION AT 9:30 P.M. UW 12 ~ p AN ,~.~ ALL-AMERICA CI1Y ~ ~ ~n~ ~~ ~~ ~s ~ sa 1.9 ~8 '9 sESOUICEN7ENN~~~ A Beawei~ulBt~ne~eg ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS • AGENDA OCTOBER 23, 1990 Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meeting. Regular meetings are held on the second Tuesday and the fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public hearings are held at 7:00 p.m on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.) 1. Roll Call. 2. Invocation: The Reverend Michael Meloy Windsor Hills United Methodist Church 3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag. B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS C. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS, AND AWARDS 1. Resolution of Congratulations to Roland E. Cook Elementary School upon its 75th anniversary D. NEW BUSINESS i 1. Resolution of Support for Virginia Tech's irnoivement in the Hotel Roanoke/Conference Center Project. 2. Appropriation of funds to cover the loss of state grant funds for the arts. 3. Authorization to upgrade Computer Aided Dispatch System for police, fire and rescue. 4, Approval of Legislative Program. 5. Recommendation on Regional Airport Commission membership. 6. Memorandum of Understanding regarding assignment of School personnel, Consolidation Agreement E. REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS F. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS G. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING FOR REZONING ORDINANCE -CONSENT AGENDA H. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance at the request of Roanoke Gas Company to share a County water line easement. I. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 2 J• APPOINTMENTS 1. Board of Zoning Appeals 2. Building Code Board of Adjustments and Appeals 3. Explore Advisory Committee 4. Grievance Panel 5. Recycling Advisory Committee K. CONSENT AGENDA ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSRE ~E ~A ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTIODN INUTHE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DESIRED, THAT ITEM WII.L BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WrLL BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY. 1. Approval of Minutes - September 25, 1990, October 9, 1990 2. Confirmation of Committee Appointments to the Explore Advisory Committee. 3. Request for acceptance of Mill Pond Drive and Kingsmill Drive into the VDOT Secondary System. 4. Acceptance of water and sanitary sewer facilities serving Heather Park. ~. Resolution of support for a direct highway connection between Va. Tech and I-$1 3 6. Request to increase Petty Cash for Youth Haven II. 7. Donation of drainage easement from Norma Jean and Glenda Gale Holbrook. . L REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS 1VI. CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND CO1bIlVIU1vICAT'IONS 1. Pat Dalton to speak concerning "No Left Turn" signs onto Mudlick Road in the City of Roanoke. N. REPORTS 1. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance 2. General Fund Unappropriated Balance 3. Board Contingency Fund 4. Analysis of Income and Expense for the three months ended September 30, 1990. O. EXECUTIVE SESSION pursuant to the Code of Virginia section 2.1-344 A P. CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE SESSION EVENING SESSION (7:00 P.M.~ Q. PUBLIC HEp~RINGS 4 1090-1 Public Hearing and adoption of Roanoke Rebosoand used exemption of property awned by for charitable and benevolent purposes on a nonprofit basis. R, PUBLIC 1[EARINGS AND SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1090-2 An ordinance to rezone 1.301 acres from R-1 to R-3 to allow apartments, located on Feather Road at VA 24, Vinton Magisterial District, upon the petition of W. E. Cundiff. 1090-3 An ordinance to rezone 12.3 acres from R-1 to R-E to allow a golf course, located along Wolf Creek between Hardy Road and VA 24, Vinton Magisterial District, upon the petition of Steve Brown. 1090-4 An ordinance to rezone approximately 125 acres from M- 1 to M-2 and amend the Future Land Use Plan map designation of approximately 175 acres from Development to Principal Industrial to allow industrial development, located south of the intersection of US 11/460 (West Main Street) and Route 612 (Barley Drive) and adjacent to and west of the N&W Railway, Catawba Magisterial District, upon the petition of the Industrial Development Authority. 1090-5 An ordinance rezoning 7.35 acres from RE Residential to M-2 Manufacturing to construct a contractor office and equipment storage located on Catawba Valley Drive in the s Catawba Magisterial District upon the request of Lacy G. Alexander. (CON'17NUED FROM SEPTEMBER 25, 1990) 1090-6 An ordinance to amend the proffered conditions on 2.25 acres, to construct a retail drive-thru window, located at 4515 Brambleton Avenue, Windsor Hills Magisterial District, upon the request of Springwood Associates. (COriTINUED FROM SEPTEMBER 25, 1990) 1090-7 Ordinance requesting vacation of approximately 250 feet of an existing 20 foot wide sanitary sewer easement shown on construction plans for Edinburgh Green addition S. CITIZENS' CO1I~IlVIENTS AND CO1bIlVIUNICATIONS T. ADJOURN1ViENT 6 r~ °~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, OCTOBER 23, 1990 RESOLUTIONNTAR HOOL CUPON IT8~75 H ANNIVERLS RYE• COOK ELE WHEREAS, the Roland E. Cook Elementary School has been meeting the educational needs of the children of the Vinton area for 75 years, having opened its doors in 1915; and WHEREAS, the facility was originally known as the Vinton School, and was built at a cost to the County of less than $3,000; and WHEREAS, the Roland E. Cook Elementary School is the oldest school in the Eastern part of the County, and was named for Roland Eugene Cook, who served as Superintendent of Roanoke County Schools from 1906 to 1945; and WHEREAS, there have been periods during the past 75 years that the school served as the only educational facility for all ages of children in the Vinton area; and WHEREAS, there are thousands of graduates of the School throughout the Roanoke Valley and the Commonwealth of Virginia. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, on its behalf and on behalf of all the residents of Roanoke County, congratulates the faculty, staff and pupils of the ROLAND E. COOK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL on the celebration of the 75th Anniversary of the School; and FURTHER, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors extends its deepest wishes for a bright future for both the Roland E. Cook Elementary School and the many children who were educated ~ ~ in its classrooms. On motion of Supervisor Nickens, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES• Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Mary H. A len, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Resolutions of Congratulations File Dr. Bayes Wilson, Superintendent, Roanoke County Schools > ~. ~' - ~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HEL TUESDAY,ROCTOBER 23~ 19~MINISTRATION CENTER ON RESOLUTIORY gCHOOLNUPONU TSI75TH TANNIVE SARY~ COOK ELEMENTA WHEREAS, the Roland E. Cook Elementary School has been meeting the educational needs of the children of the Vinton area for 75 years, having opened its doors in 1915; and WHEREAS, the facility was originally known as the Vinton School, and was built at a cost to the County of less than $3,000; and WHEREAS, the Roland E. Cook Elementary School is the oldest school in the Eastern part of the County, and was named for Roland Eugene Cook, who served as Superintendent of Roanoke County Schools from 1906 to 1945; and WHEREAS, there have been periods during the past 75 years that the school served as the only educational facility for all ages of children in the Vinton area; and WHEREAS, there are thousands of graduates of the School throughout the Roanoke Valley and the Commonwealth of Virginia. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, on its behalf and on behalf of all the residents of Roanoke County, congratulates the faculty, staff and pupils of the ROLAND E. COOK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL on the celebration of the 75th Anniversary of the School; and FURTHER, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors extends its deepest wishes for a bright future for both the Roland E. Cook Elementary School and the many children who were educated in its classrooms. C ` ~ ,.,..,~'r ~ l AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT TDESDAY,OOCTOBERT23,~1990STRATION CENTER ON RESOLUTION 102390-2 EXPRESSING SUPPORT FOR THE INVOLVEMENT OF VIRGINIA TECH IN THE HOTEL ROANORE/CONFERENCE CENTER PROJECT WHEREAS, the Hotel Roanoke has been a landmark in the Roanoke Valley for over 100 years, and WHEREAS, the Hotel Roanoke has provided to the City of Roanoke substantial tax revenues and is a tourism asset to the entire Roanoke Valley, and WHEREAS, the City of Roanoke and Virginia Tech recognizes the opportunities to develop training, continuing education, conferences and conventions in the Roanoke Valley, and WHEREAS, the current owner, Virginia Tech Real Estate Foundation, Inc., and the City have agreed to begin construction of a conference center and to seek a developer to renovate the Hotel to its a first class facility, and WHEREAS, Roanoke County recognizes and supports this project as vital to the future economic growth of Roanoke City and an important project to the entire Valley. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, expresses its strong support for the continued involvement of Virginia Tech in construction and renovation of the Hotel Roanoke/Conference Center, and FURTHER, the Board directs that copies of this resolution be forwarded to officials of Roanoke City and Virginia Tech, and that a copy be forwarded to the Honorable Douglas Wilder, Governor of Virginia and the Roanoke Valley legislative delegation. On motion of Supervisor Johnson, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES• Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Mary H. lien, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File The Honorable L. Douglas Wilder, Governor, Commonwealth of Virginia The Honorable Noel C. Taylor, Mayor, City of Roanoke W. Robert Herbert, Roanoke City Manager Dr. James D. McCormas, President, Virginia Tech Raymond Smoot, Virginia Tech Real Estate Foundation, Inc. Roanoke Valley Legislators r ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER ~ - AT A REGULAR HELDIAT THE ROANOKE~DCOUNTY ADMINI TRATIONRCENTER COUNTY, VIRGI MEETING DATE' October 23, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: Resolution Supporting Virginia Tech's involvement in the Hotel Roanoke/Conference Center project. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION Governor Douglas Wilder recently questioned the involvement of Virginia Tech in the Hotel Roanoke/Conference Center project in view of the Un viers t atof f iagalschave assured ceveryone 1thatTstate finances. Y tax dollars will not be used. Roanoke City officials have expressed concern at this action and plan to request the Governor's support for this important economic development project. While Roanoke County has not yet determined whether to participate in funding this project, we support Virginia Tech's involvement and recognize the importance of the project to Roanoke City. The attached resolution expresses support for the project and the continued in`~olvement of Virginia Tech. The project is important to the future growth of the Roanoke Valley. RECOMMENDATION' It is recommended that the attached resolution of support be adopted and forwarded to Roanoke City and Virginia Tech officials and to Governor Douglas Wilder. ,~ ~~~~. ~' Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ----------------------------- ACTION Approved ( ) Motion by: Eddy Denied ( ) Johnson Received ( ) McGraw Referred ( ) Nickens To ( ) Robers VOTE No Yes Abs e ~ - AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT TUESDAAYN,OOCTOBERT23A,D1990STRATION CENTER ON RESOLUTION EXPRESSING SUPPORT FOR THE INVOLVEMENT OF VIRGINIA TECH IN THE HOTEL ROANORE/CONFERENCE CENTER PROJECT WHEREAS, the Hotel Roanoke has been a landmark in the Roanoke Valley for over 100 years, and WHEREAS, the Hotel Roanoke has provided to the City of Roanoke substantial tax revenues and is a tourism asset to the entire Roanoke Valley, and WHEREAS, the current owner, Virginia Tech Real Estate Foundation, Inc., and the City have agreed to begin construction of a conference center and to seek a developer to renovate the Hotel to its former grandeur, and WHEREAS, Roanoke County recognizes and supports this project as vital to the future economic growth of Roanoke City and an important project to the entire Valley. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, expresses its strong support for the continued involvement of Virginia Tech in construction and renovation of the Hotel Roanoke/Conference Center, and FURTHER, the Board directs that copies of this resolution be forwarded to officials of Roanoke City and Virginia Tech, and that a copy be forwarded to the Honorable Douglas Wilder, Governor of Virginia. ACTION # A-102390-3 ITEM NUMBER ~ ` "~ AT A REGULARpMHELDNAT THEHROANOKE COUNTYEADMINISTRATION CENTER COUNTY, VIRGINI MEETING DATE: October 23, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: Appropriation of Funds to Cover the Loss of the State Matching Grant for the Arts. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR' S COMMENTS: ~iLt.~'+'''~'jz'~~ ~ ~~ J BACKGROUND: On June 26, 1990 the Board of Supervisors accepted the Commission for the Arts' Challenge Grant of $4,250 for FY 1990- 91. Combined with the County's appropriation of $20,000 for cultural enrichment, the following organizations would have received a total contribution of $24,250 in FY 1990-91. VCA Local Grant Appropriation Total Arts Council of the $ 2 125 $ 2,500 $ 4,625 Roanoke Valley , -0- 15,000 15,000 Center in the Square 125 2 2.500 Roanoke Symphony , 4 250 20 000 24 250 SUNIl~IARY OF INFORMATION: On September 28, 1990 staff was notified that due to a 25$ budget reduction in the Virginia Commission for the Arts budget for the 1990-92 biennium, the Local Government Challenge Grants have been eliminated for FY 1990-91. Staff has been told that although the Virginia Commiss rant fundsf available be reduced next year, there will be matching g to local governments in 1991-92. FISCAL IMPACT: Currently, the County has appropriated $2,500 to both the Arts Council of the Roanoke Valley and the Symphony. The Board of Supervisors can leave the funding at this level, with no additional appropriation necessary. Or, the Board could make up the loss from the elimination of the Local Government Challenge Grant by appropriating $4,250 from the Board Contingency to be split equally between the two organizations referred to above. ~ -Z STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors appropriate the additional $4,250 due to the fact that we are already four months into the fiscal year and the recipient organizations have developed their operating budgets with the understanding that they were to receive this higher level of support from the County of Roanoke. /t ~~~li:. .C Reta R. Busher Director of Management & t ~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator - Budge --------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs Approved (x) Motion by: Richard W Robers Eddy ~ Denied ( ) toto aA~rove Received ( ) Johnson ~_ Referred ( ) McGraw ~_ Nickens ~_ To Robers ~_ cc: File Reta Busher, Director, Management & Budget Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance ~' _ 7' M1~ i - © C ~ ~ - { J " - C~~~I~N~Z'E~1LT~--I o f ~II~~II~I~ Commission for the Arts ~ECGV ~ P;~~~~E-- xECUTIVE DIRECTCP JAMES MONROE BUILDING - lith FLOOR COMMISSION MEMBERS ~ 101 N. 14th ST. +ARGARETTE M SMITH. CHAIR RICHMOND. VIRGINIA 23219-3683 .:INCHESrER 1804) 225-3132 Voce TDD EDWIN S CLAY III VICE CHAIR FAIRFAX September 28, 1990 I+ARV TRENT .ONES. SECR ETARY ABINGDON NANCY BAGLEY 4DAMS HAMPTON FAYE Y BENTON Mr. Elmer C. Hodge RICHMOND Roanoke County ROBERT E BROWN P.O. B.OX• 2(1800 . 7 NORFOLK ROanOke, VA 24018-0798 HERMINA WALTHALL BUTC HER LYNCHBURG Reference I.D.~~ 91-0510 -Local Government Challenge Grant TOY LACY COBBE MARTINSVILLE MARY S. ELLETT - Dear Mr. Hodge: LYNCHBURG id t of an JAMES C McKEEVER. JR. AS you know, Virginia state government is in them s FAIRFAx unprecedented revenue shortfall. This problem is affecting all state KATHRYN CHAPPELL NETTLES government services and programs. Governor Wilder has been forced to WAKEFIELD make substantial spending cuts in the budgets of most state agencies, 'RACY A. SPERO including the Virginia Commission for the Arts. The appropriation NORFOLK for the Commission has been cut by 257 for the 1990-92 biennium. CASSANDRA O STODDART RICHMOND You are aware that the size of the revenue shortfall caug t state officials by surprise. The Virginia Commission for the Arts awards most of its grant funds before the start of the fiscal year and had paid out the grants to .arts organizations and artists in July of this year. When we learned in early September the size of the budget reduction for this agency, there was little flexibility left in making plans for the spending reduction. Unfortunately, the Local Government Challenge Grants had been committed to 74 Vir inia local governments, but the checks ha g ~.. ._~P 9.not been issued.., The Commission will,°therefoie, be unable to. a the ~ "1990-9lgrants. This reduction"in no way reflects the importance that the board and staff of the Commission place upon. these grants. The Local Government Challenge Grants are critical to the growth of the arts statewide. Although the Virginia Commission grant funds will be reduced next year as well, there will be matching grants for local governments in 1991-92. Other grant programs will be cut in order to have the funds to continue our partnership with counties, cities, and towns in support of the arts. -a September 28, 1990 Page Two I hope ,that your government will still provide its share of funds for the arts organizations in your area this year. Despite the many pressures on state and local government finances, the arts are a vital part of the quality of life in any community. Even though the Commission will not provide its incentive this year, we will continue the program in the future. We will give priority in funding to those local governments that demonstrate an ongoing commitment to support of the arts. If you have any questions about this grant program or any of the other Commission programs, do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, pay 9. ~~~ Peggy J. Baggett Executive Director ACTION NO. A-102390-4 ITEM NUMBER -~ "" ~ AT A REGULAR ELD AT THE ROANOKEA COUNTY ADMINISTRATIONRCENTER COUNTY, VIRGINIA H MEETING DATE: October 23, 1990 AGENDA ITEM' Authorization to upgrade Computer Aided Dispatch system for Police, Fire and Rescue. v~ COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~L~ uaK~ BACKGROUND' The current computer hardware utilized for the Computer Aided Dispatch (CAD) system has reached its limits in terms of support for additional users and/or software. The equipment technology has become obsolete and vendor maintenance support agreements are costly. The vendor has offered to allow trade-in credit for the existing equipment and to provide additional promotional incentives which allow for a purchase that, combined with lower maintenance fees of the new equipment, reduces the current monthly operating costs by approximately $50 Dollars. Beyond the five-ye as pmuch aas term, the monthly operating costs can be lowered by $1,400. Additional appropriations are not required. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: As a result of efforts to encourage customers to replace obsolete equipment, the CAD hardware vendor has extended trade-in and promotional incentives which provide a one-time opportunity for the County to replace current equipment without additional capital funding while providing a concurrent lowering of operating costs. The software (CAD programs) will not be affected by this equipment change. However, the equipment upgrade will provide compatibility with the County administrative computer, therefore reducing required support for maintaining differing computer systems. This reduction in required support is not presented in the dollar savings, neither is the substantial savings from reduced power consumption. The effect of the equipment replacement will be the exchange of the current computer system having limited capabilities with a computer that will cover current demands and has th E911 ephone limitation on expansion. With a decrease in a ment surcharge, there is currently no contingency for equip replacement nor for upgrades. Without the current vendor ..J - incentives, the inevitable required equipment replacement will result in a request of additional fund appropriations from the Board. The following cost information is derived from data in Attachment 1. , Current equipment hardware and software (MONTHLY MAINTENANCE) costs equal $2,220.00. Replacement equipment hardware and software (MONTHLY MAINTENANCE AND TERM PAYMENT) costs would equal $2,171.16, a net monthly savings of $48.84. Beyond the sixty month agreement the hardware and software (MONTHLY MAINTENANCE) savings will equal $1,476.00. FISCAL IMPACT' The Fiscal Impact from this replacement would be very positive. Within the first sixty months the monthly operating expense savings would amount to $48.84 with a period total of $2,930.40. Beyond the sixty month purchase term period, the monthly operating expense savings would be approximately $1,400. Not included in this amount is $350 savings in reduced monthly power consumption. Engagement in this purchase for equipment replacement will require NO current or future appropriations. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board approve the replacement of the equipment and engagement in a five-year lease/purchase agreement. The vendor extends the trade-in and promotional incentives until October 31, 1990. Orders placed with the vendor after that date are not eligible for the incentives. Equipment replacement witho t the incentives is currently not recommended by the staff. Res tfully submitted, Appro d by, ~ ~ ~~ Os D. Bryant Elmer C. Hodge Director, M.I.S. County Administrator Approved (x) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) ACTION Motion by: Harry C Nickens to approve VOTE No Yes Abs Eddy .~_ Johnson _~ McGraw ~.. Nickens .~ Robers ~ cc: File ~ Oscar D. Bryant, Director, M.I.S. Reta Busher, Director, Management & Budget Diane Hyatt, Director, ~`inance Stan Altenhein, Director, Procurement -~ ATTACHMENT 1. Current Equipment CAD COMPUTER MONTHLY COSTS HARDWARE MAINTENANCE SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE TOTAL MONTHLY MAINTENANCE COSTS New Equipment ~~~ MAINTENANCE TOTAL MONTHLY MAINTENANCE COSTS Net Monthly Maintenance Cost Savings Term Agreement ($71,215.80) for 60 months NET MONTHLY SAVINGS FROM EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT $1,400.00 $ 820.00 $2.220.00 $ 379.00 $ 365.00 $ 744.00 $1.476-,UO $1,427.16 $ 48.84 3 ACTION NO. A-102390-5 ITEM NO. ~- AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: October 23, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: Legislative Program for the 1991 session of the Virginia General Assembly COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY' Each year the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors considers adopting a legislative program for submission to the Virginia General Assembly and for the guidance of staff. BACKGROUND' Over the past several months various members of the Board of Supervisors and several members of the County staff have recom- mended different topics for consideration for adoption by the Board as its legislative program for the 1991 session of the Virginia General Assembly. The upcoming session will be a "short" session. It appears that the General Assembly will be primarily concerned with the Governor's approach to resolving the projected budget revenue shortfall and with redistricting. The Board may also want to consider the opportunity to meet with the members of the local legislative delegation to discuss the adopted County priorities. In the past the Board has met with our representatives at a breakfast meeting shortly before the commence- ment of the session. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The following issues have been recommended as possible topics for consideration by the Board in adopting a legislative program for the 1991 session of the Virginia General Assembly: 1) One Tax Bill for County and Town Taxes - This legislation would authorize the joint collection of taxes by a County and a town. A single tax bill could reflect both county and town real estate and personal property taxes, thereby 1 reducing costs suggested that Vinton and the and improving efficiency. It has been this be a joint submission by the Town of County. 2) Lottery - This legislation would amend Section 58.1-4022 to provide that a portion of the revenue generated by the sale of lottery tickets would be returned to the locality of sale. The Board adopted a resolution in support of this action on September 12, 1990. 3) Stormwater Utility Fees - This legislation would authorize local governments to assess user charges to recover the costs of administering the construction, operation and maintenance of a stormwater management program. These charges would be assessed upon all property owners based upon their contributions to stormwater runoff. 4) Industrial Access Road Funding - This action would request the General Assembly to direct the Virginia Department of Transportation to extend the time for securing a qualifying industry for industrial access road funding. The justification for this request is the current economic condition in the Commonwealth. 5) Human Services Needs - This request seeks State funding to reach the funding goal of 80/20 reimbursement for administrative costs, and to fund all positions needed as shown by caseload standards. This request seeks block grant funding for residen- tial care for adolescents (the formula should include COLA, inflation factors and programs to insure statewide parity). This would include a legislative mandate for the Department of Mental Health/Mental Retardation and Substance Abuse to provide services for children. On a local level there is a critical need for an adolescent in-patient unit at Catawba Hospital and for a public adolescent substance abuse detoxification unit and a public adolescent residential substance abuse program. There are also specific public health care needs for adolescents. 6) Animal Control - Amend Section 3.1-796.86 to require a current rabies certificate of vaccination as a prere- quisite for securing a license. 2 ~- 7) Collections - Amend Section 64.1-157 to assign the same priority to the payment of debts of the estate of a decedent for local taxes as provided debts and taxes due the Commonwealth (priority #6)• g) Capital Funding - Request funding for the construction of the Regional Forensic Science Laboratory. g) Zonin - Restrict the power of the judiciary to revise or overrumattereexcept in theocasegofe fraud or direct land use violation of law. 10) Bingo/Raffles - Authorize the local ~ x e on nthe ° gross impose up to a ten percent (10~) receipts of all bingo games and raffles. It is recommended that the Board consider the formulation of a legislative program for Roanoke County for The Board maytwant9to session of the Virginia General Assembly. prioritize or delete the various items listed above. Finally the Board should advise staff of its preference with respect to scheduling a breakfast meeting with the local legislative delegati- on to discuss these issues. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Respectfully submitted, ~~ ~ Action Vote No Yes Abs Approved (x) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by See BElow Eddy Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers (1) Lee B. Eddy motion to limit assessment increase each year. Defeated 4 to 1 voice vote (2) Lee B. Eddy motion to request limitation in authority of Courts to overturn zoning decision Approved Unanimous Voice Vote (3) Lee B. Eddy motion to allow local authority to tax bingo profits. Approved 4 to 1 voice vote (4) Lee B. Eddy motion to approve legislative program with two additions approved by board members and deletion of authorizatio^ for Animal Control vehicles to be equipped with flashing lights AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Robers NAYS: Supervisor Nickens 3 cc: File Paul Mahoney, County Attorney ~- w ACTION NO. A-102390-6 ITEM NUMBER -S AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: October 23, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: Recommendation on future appointments to the Regional Airport Commission COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND' In 1986, the General Assembly approved the formation of a regional airport commission for the purpose of operating the regional airport facility. The commission is currently made up of five members, three appointed by the Roanoke City governing body and two appointed by the Roanoke County, governing body. Roanoke County has chosen to appoint elected members of the Board of Supervisors, while Roanoke City has chosen to appoint Roanoke City staff officials. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: At their September 12 and October 9 meeting, the Board of Supervisors requested that staff study other regional airport commissions bring to the Board a recommendation for future appointments. Attached is a list of the localities that were contacted regarding the composition of their airport commissions. Based on discussion with other communities there are several general recommendations regarding the makeup of an airport commission. o The Commission should be relatively small with only five to seven members. It is difficult to conduct business and reach consensus in a timely manner with a larger group. o Commission membership should include one elected official from each governing body with the remaining membership composed of citizens from the business community. o Membership coming from the community should have business, finance or marketing expertise. Individuals with aviation or airline vendor experience tend to focus on the technical aspects of an airport rather than the overall policy making decisions. .1J -~ o With a strong airport manager and staff as the Roanoke Regional Airport has, local government staff should not be appointed, but should be available as resources to both the commission and airport staff. o The commission should limit itself to policy making and budgetary decisions and assure that the airport staff is given the authority to run the day to day operations of the airport. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that a committee be appointed with representatives from Roanoke City, Roanoke County and the Airport Manager to study the issue further and bring back a recommendation to both the Roanoke City and Roanoke County governing bodies. If the committee recommends a larger membership on the commission, General Assembly action will be required. Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator Approved (x ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) ACTION Motion by: Harry C.Nickens to approve VOTE No Yes Abs Eddy x Johnson x McGraw x Nickens x Robers x cc: File Regional Airport Commission File Paul Mahoney, County Attorney Richard W. Robers, Member, Regional Airport Commission Bob L. Johnson, Member, Regional Airport Commission ~-S GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA Operates under a 7 member Airport Authority. 1 - City of Greensboro 4 - Guilford County 1 - Winston-Salem 1 - Forsythe County 3 year terms, maximum of 3 terms. No requirement to be of any discipline, none are officials except that one happens to be the Mayor of a town located in the area, but this is not a pre-requisite. ' Information from Stephanie Hunter 919-665-5600 DULLES INTERNATIONAL 11 members as a Board of Directors 1 - Presidential appointee 3 - District of Columbia (Mayor appoints) 2 - Maryland (Governor appoints) 5 - Virginia (Governor appoints) Members may not now hold public office, must live in the Washington, D.C. S.M.5.A., and are not paid. The members happen to be public spirited members who may have been involved in Public Service in the past and know how the bureaucracy works. The representative from the Director's office suggested that if the localities are not responsible for operating deficits, then consideration should be given to having all at large membership. If there is liability for operations by the representative governments, then some membership should be included. The fees and charges at Dulles are sufficient to cover their costs. Greg Wolfe 703-739-8745 -~ COMPOSITION OF AIRPORT COMMISSIONS MEMPHIS, TENNESSEE 6 Appointed by Mayor and 1 appointed by County Pre-requisites for Mayoral appointments 1 - Engineer 1 - Attorney 1 - Commerce and Industry 1 - Community Leader 1 - Industrial Community involved in aviation (pilot, etc.) 1 - Finance The County appointee happens to be an engineer who is also a pilot. The Chairman happens to be a pilot at the present time. Information received from the office of Larry Cox. 901-922-8077 RICHMOND, VIRGINIA 14 Members of the Commission 4 - Henrico County 4 - Chesterfield County 2 - Hanover County 4 - Richmond Currently, 6 are elected officials and 8 represent various business interests. There is no specified mix based on governmental employee, official, etc. nor on the discipline represented. All members are to be interested in the Economic Growth of the aviation community and the Economic Development of the areas served. Information from Kevin Meers 804-226-3018 CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA The airport operates as a department of the City and has a 9 member advisory council, 3 of which are appointed by the Mayor and 6 by City Council. Of these members, 2 are to have ties to the aviation community, 2 from the neighboring area, and the other 5 are at large. This group advises and makes recommendation to City Council and serve a staggered 3 year term. Information from Gene Cannery 704-359-4000 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. - Lo AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: October 23, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: Memorandum of Understanding, Consolidation Agree- ment, Assignment of Personnel COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY• This memorandum of understanding states the belief and intent of the City and County negotiators with respect to the reassignment of faculty and staff of the consolidated school system. BACKGROUND• The County of Roanoke and the City of Roanoke entered into a Consolidation Agreement dated February 28, 1990. Amendments to this Agreement were entered into July 11, 1990. The parties have endorsed a memorandum of understanding with respect to the payment of transition costs for the Roanoke Metropolitan Government (RMG). SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Since May of this year the Board of Supervisors has discussed the merits of adopting and approving a memorandum of understanding to document the belief and intent of the City and County negotiato- rs with respect to the assignment of faculty and staff of the consolidated school system. The attached Memorandum of Understanding states this intent. The parties believe that the creation of a consolidated school system will not require the reassignment of faculty and staff from the schools to which they are currently assigned. Further there is no legal requirement for a reassignment as a result of con- solidation. The negotiators acknowledge the legal authorities of the School Board of RMG and its Superintendent to assign personnel, as provided in Sections 22.1-294, 22.1-295 and 22.1-297 of the State Code, and the cases interpreting these provisions. 1 L.t~ STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Board consider authorizing the Chairman and the County Attorney to endorse the attached Memorandum of Understanding. Respectfully submitted, ~~ M'.. ~ Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney Action Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by Eddy Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers Vote No Yes Abs 2 V MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING RE: ASSIGNMENT OF EDUCATION PERSONNEL OCTOBER 23, 1990 The February 28, 1990, Consolidation Agreement and the July 11, 1990, Amendments thereto between the County of Roanoke and the City of Roanoke include certain provisions with respect to Education and Personnel. It is the intent of the County and City negotiating team members that the governing body for the Roanoke Metropolitan Government (RMG), the school board of RMG and the citizens be informed of the understandings of the negotiating teams and their interpretation of various provisions of this Agreement. It is the belief of the parties to this Agreement that the creation of a consolidated school system will not require reassignment of faculty and staff from the schools to which they are currently assigned, and it is also the belief of the parties that there are no legal requirements for such reassignments. It is, therefore, the intent of the parties to this Agreement that such reassignments should not occur. This statement shall not restrict the legal authorities of the School Board of RMG and its Superintendent to assign personnel. WITNESS, the following signatures and seals: CITY OF ROANOKE COUNTY OF ROANOKE Howard E. Musser, Vice Mayor City of Roanoke Beverly T. Fitzpatrick, Member City Council City of Roanoke Richard W. Robers, Chairman Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney County of Roanoke Wilburn C. Dibling, Jr., Esq. City Attorney City of Roanoke 3 ~~ AT A REGULAR MEETINGLODFATHTHEOROANOKESCOUNTYSADMINISTRATION COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HE 1990 CENTER ON TUESDAY, OCTOBER 23, AMENDING AND RESOLUTION NO. 102390-7 BEEN ENTSG pARTICIPATION~ NTICOUNTY OATHI~ IC RESID PROGRAMS WHEREAS, the Board of County Supervisors has heretofore established policies relating to participation in County athletic programs by residents outside the boundaries of Roanoke County; and WHEREAS, the Board desires to revise and amend said policies in order to provide the opportunity for certain non-county residents to participate in County athletic programs upon certain terms and conditions; and WHEREAS, the Board desires to revise the participation policy in Roanoke County Athletic Leagues to facilitate the formation of teams; and WHEREAS, the Board desires to revise said policies by amending Resolution No. 1585, adopted August 17, 1976. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia: 1. That the provisions of County policies relating to the participation of non-residents in County athletic programs remain in full force and effect: 2. That said policies be amended and reenacted by allowing non-resident youth, who are currently attending Roanoke County public schools, to participate in Roanoke County athletic programs upon the following conditions: a. That each individual participant be currently enrolled in a Roanoke County public school: b. That the County Administrator, upon the advice of the Director of the Parks and Recreation Department, shall have the right to deny such participation if, in his sole judgement, a County resident would otherwise be unable to participate in that athletic program. 3. That this resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after the date of its adoption. On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Don Myers, Assistant County Administrator Steve Carpenter, Director, Parks & Recreation Dr. Bayes Wilson, Superintendent, Roanoke County Schools Mary Hicks, Executive Secretary Paul Mahoney, County Attorney ~ N r ACTION # ITEM NUMBER , AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: October 23, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: REQUEST BY ROANOKE GAS COMPANY TO SHARE A COUNTY WATER LINE EASEMENT COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Roanoke Gas Company has obtained a twenty foot (20') wide gas line easement across three residential properties in the Deer Run Estates Subdivision. That easement coincides with an existing easement granted to Roanoke County for installation of a water line. Since Roanoke County has an interest in these properties by virtue of the easements, it is necessary for the County to be a party to the Deeds of Easement to indicate our willingness to share the easement with Roanoke Gas Company. The Utility Department has no objection to sharing the above mentioned water line easement with Roanoke Gas Company for the installation of a gas line as indicated on the Deed of Easement. The gas line will be installed a distance of five feet horizontally and one foot vertically from the existing water line and will not interfere with our use of the easement. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board of Supervisors approve the first reading of an ordinance authorizing the County Administrator to become a party to the above mentioned Deeds of Easement. The second reading and adoption of the ordinance will be scheduled for November 13, 1990. ~~- / SUBMITTED BY: Cliffor aig, . Utility Director ACTION Approved ( ) Motion by: Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to APPROVED: .-°vy~-~ ~~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator VOTE No Eddy Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers Yes Abs H-/ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT TiJESDAy?OOCTOBER 23ADM99IOSTRATION CENTER ON ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE CONVEYANCE OF AN EASEMENT TO THE ROANOKE GAS COMPANY BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.01 of the Charter of Roanoke County, the subject property has been declared to be surplus and is being made available for other public uses, i.e. a gas line easement within the existing water line easement; and 2. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading concerning the disposi- tion of the subject property was held on October 23, 1990; a second reading was held on November 13, 1990; and 3. That the twenty (20) foot wide water line easement currently exists across three residential properties in the Deer Run Estates Subdivision; said easements were granted unto Roanoke County by deeds of easement recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County in Deed Book 1146, page 720; Deed Book 1146, page 724; and Deed Book 1146, page 726; and 4. That the twenty (20) foot gas line easement for Roanoke Gas Company, extending natural gas from Starmount Drive to Tinker- dale, coincides with the existing water line easement of Roanoke County and involves the joint use of said easement area; and 5. That the proceeds from the sale of the easement are to be allocated to the capital reserves of Roanoke County; and 1 .. ~l -/ 6. That the offer of the Roanoke Gas Company of One Dollar ($1.00) for the joint easement is hereby accepted and all other offers are rejected; and 7. That the County Administrator is authorized to execute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County as are necessary to accomplish the conveyance of said easement, all of which shall be upon form approved by the County Attorney. 2 r ~.. ACTION NUMBER ITEM NUMBER ~-l -~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: October 23, 1990 SUBJECT: Appointments to Committees, Commissions and Boards COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: 1 Board of Zoninct Appeals Five-year term of M. E. Maxey, Vinton Magisterial District expired June 30, 1990. 2 Building Code Board of Adjustments and Appeals Four-year term of Albert Trompeter will expire October 24, 1990. 3 Explore Advisory Committee • The Board approved the establishment of an Explore Advisory Committee on September 25, 1990. The following appointments should be made by the Board of Supervisors: - One member appointed by each Supervisor to represent his magisterial district. (representatives from Catawba and Windsor Hills Magisterial Districts have been nominated.) - One member appointed by the Board to represent East Roanoke County from the north side of the Roanoke River - One member appointed by the Board to represent East Roanoke County from the south side of the Roanoke River 4. Grievance Panel Two-year terms of Thomas T. Palmer and R. Vincent Reynolds, Alternate expired September 10, 1990. 5 Recycling Advisory Committee • The Board approved the establishment of a Recycling Advisory ,~ ~ - .~ Committee on September 25, 1990. The following appointments should be made by the Board of Supervisors: - One member from the Board of Supervisors - Two members from the County business community - Two lay members from Roanoke County SUBMITTED BY: ~. Mary H. Allen Clerk to the Board APPROVED BY: ~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Eddy Received ( ) Johnson Ref erred ( ) McGraw To ( ) Nickens Robers AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HONDTUESDAY,ROCTOBERC231,I,199pMINISTRATION CENTER RESOLUTION 102390-8 APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM R - CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. that the certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for October 23, 1990, designated as Item K - Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 7, inclusive, as follows: 1. Approval of Minutes - September 25, 1990, October 9, 1990 2. Confirmation of Committee Appointments to the Explore Advisory Committee. 3. Request for acceptance of Mill Pond Drive and Kingsmill Drive into the VDOT Secondary System. 4. Acceptance of water and sanitary sewer facilities serving Heather Park. 5. Resolution of support for a direct highway connection between Va. Tech and I-81 6. Request to increase Petty Cash for Youth Haven II. 7. Donation of drainage easement from Norma Jean and Glenda Gale Holbrook. 2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this resolution. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to approve resolution with Item #5 removed for discussion, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt resolution in Item #5 after discussion, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None ABSTAIN: Supervisor Eddy A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Phillip Henry, Director, Engineering Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance Cliff Craig, Director, Utilities ~-I September 25, 1990 C Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Roanoke County Administration Center 3738 Brambleton Avenue, S.W. Roanoke, Virginia 24018 September 25, 1990 The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, met this day at the Roanoke County Administration Center, this being the fourth Tuesday, and the second regularly scheduled meeting of the month of September, 1990. IN RE: CALL TO ORDER Chairman Robers called the meeting to order at 3:00 p.m. The roll call was taken. MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Richard W. Robers, Vice Chairman Steven A. McGraw, Supervisors Lee B. Eddy, Bob L. Johnson, Harry C. Nickens MEMBERS ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator; John M. Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator for Human Services; John R. Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator of Community Services and Development; Don M. Myers, Assistant County Administrator for Management Services; Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney; Brenda J. Holton, Deputy Clerk; Anne Marie Green, Information Officer 687 ~~ September 25, 1990 1. Explore presentation and announcement of Plan Review Process Initiation. A-92590-1 County Administrator Elmer Hodge recommended that the Board, Planning Commission and Explore staff have a joint work session. Dr. Norman D. Fintel, River Foundation President, and Board Member, Peggy Moles made presentations to the Board. Larry Hamler, Chairman, Virginia Recreation Facility Authority, Project Director, Bern Ewert and Engineer Richard Burrow were also present. Supervisor Nickens moved to approve the staff recommendation to initiate the plan review process by 1/1/91 and to establish an Explore Advisory committee. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None 2. Approval of adjustments to 1990-91 Budget due to state funding changes. A-92590-2 Assistant County Administrator John Chambliss advised that instead of the $750,000 loss which was projected due to state funding changes, the County would save $103,593. The reason for this is the use of savings from the employer contributions to the Virginia Retirement System based on the Legislature's decision not 68 9 September 25, 1990 Police Chief John H. Cease presented a 90-day progress report on the new Police Department and requested a supplemental appropriation for additional staffing. Chief Cease agreed not to ask for additional staff next year. Supervisor. Nickens moved to approve the staff recommendation of $200, 000 appropriation for four police officers, a records manager, and added that the accreditation specialist and telephone receptionist, if full time, be extended fringe benefits. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None 5. Acceptance of Adult Druq Rehabilitation Grant, and appropriation of matching funds. Chairman Robers announced that this item had been postponed. 6. Acceptance of Anti-Druq Abuse Grant for Neighborhood Hatch Program. A-92590-5 Supervisor Nickens moved to accept the grant. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None 7. Request for funding from TAP for Transitional Living Center. A-92590-6 John Chambliss advised that TAP is requesting a $15,000 691 September 25, 1990 1. An ordinance to rezone 1.301 acres from R-1 to R- 3 to allow apartments, located on Feather Road at VA 24, Vinton Magisterial District, upon the petition of W. E. Cundiff. 2. An ordinance to rezone 7.8 acres from R-1 to R-3 to allow townhouses, located on Hardy Road near Wolf Creek, Vinton Magisterial District, upon the petition of Steve Brown. 3. An ordinance to rezone 12.3 acres from R-1 to R-E to allow a golf course, located along Wolf Creek between Hardy Road and VA 24, Vinton Magisterial District, upon the petition of Steve Brown. 4. An ordinance to rezone approximately 125 acres from M-1 to M-2 and amend the Future Land Use Plan map designation of approximately 175 acres from Development to Principal Industrial to allow industrial development, located south of the intersection of US 11/460 (West Main Street) and Route 612 (Barley Drive) and adjacent to and west of the N&W Railway, Catawba Magisterial District, upon the petition of the Industrial Development Authority. IN RE; REPORTS AND INQIIIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS Supervisor Eddy: (1) He asked for an update on the status of Cable TV franchise. Supervisor McGraw reported that the next meeting will be on 9/28/90 and that an agreement should be reached by the end of the year. (2) He updated the board on recent meetings regarding complaints about Seaboard Farms. (3) He questioned whether the Justice Department had ruled on the final plan for the consolidation vote. County Attorney Mahoney advised that they have not. (4) He thanked the fellow board members for adding him to the Democratic Party mailing list but declined. Supervisor Robers: (1) He updated the board on the Smart 693 September 25, 1990 Moose Lodge No. 284. 5. Approval of Raffle Permit - Mason's Cove Elementary School PTA. 2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this resolution. On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt resolution with addition of Item 5, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None RESOLUTION 92590-8.b OF APPRECIATION TO GEORGE NESTER FOR OUTSTANDING SERVICE TO THE CITIZENS OF ROANORE COUNTY AS VINTON TOWN MANAGER WHEREAS, George Nester has served as the Town Manager of Vinton, Virginia, in the County of Roanoke, since September, 1983; and WHEREAS, George Nester has been instrumental in the continued progress of the Town of Vinton through improvements in downtown Vinton, development of the Vinton Industrial Park, expansion of Vinton's public water system, the Vinton Gladetown Community Improvement Project and the widening of Washington Avenue; and WHEREAS, George Nester has been an asset to the citizens of Roanoke County through his efforts in cooperation and negotiations on behalf of the Town of Vinton; and 695 September 25, 1990 At 5:15 p.m., Supervisor Robers moved to go into executive Session pursuant to the Code of Virginia Section 2.1- 344 (a) to discuss a specific legal matter and briefings concerning Dixie Caverns Landfill and (b) to discuss a prospective business or industry where no previous announcement has been made. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None IN RE; RECONVENEMENT At 7:00 p.m., Chairman Robers reconvened the meeting. IN RE; CERTIFICATION OF EXECOTIVE SESSION At 7:05 p.m., Supervisor McGraw moved to return to open session and adopt the Certification Resolution. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None RESOLOTION 92590-9 CERTIFYING E%ECOTIVE MEETING WA3 HELD IN CONFORMITY WITH THE CODE OF VIRGINIA WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia has convened an executive meeting on this date pursuant to an affirmative recorded vote and in accordance with the provisions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and WHEREAS, Section 2.1-344.1 of the Code of Virginia requires a certification by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that such executive meeting was conducted in conformity with Virginia law. 697 September 25, 1990 Mr. Hodge reported that Roanoke City Manager W. Robert Herbert could not be at the meeting but sent a letter expressing that the City would welcome the participation of Roanoke County. The following citizens spoke concerning the Conference Center: 1 Charles E Lavinder 5448 Cannon Road was concerned about cost of the project and is working against consolidation. 2 R. H Myers, 6533 Laban Road, supports the project but concerned about the actual implementation. 3 Winton W Shelor, Sr , 4348 Shelor_Farms Lane, was opposed to the Conference Center because of need for other things in county, and did not want tax dollars used. 4 Don Terp, 5140 Appletree Drive, did not like the arrangements, and thinks it is underfunded. He felt the County should know where the money is spent. 5 Charles L Landis, 5268 Glenvar Heights Boulevard,. did not want taxes used for Conference Center. 6 Dr Willis P Lanier, 4743 Woodlev Drive, wanted to protect the county interest by getting a fair return on investment. If the agreement is not structured, the County should table the issue. 7 Ed Kohinke, Sr 6913 Bradshaw Road, was not opposed to the project but opposed to County investment because of other needed projects. 8 Cathy Adkins, 5138 Britanev Road, supported the project and cooperation. September 25, 1990 4 ~ 9 9 ,. IN RE; The Chairman declared"a five-minute recess at 8:15 p.m. IN RE; POBLIC HEARINGB AND SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 990-2 An ordinance modifying an existing Planned IInit Development plan on a 2 acre tract generally located within the Stonehenge PIID, south of Belly Lane in the Cave Spring Magisterial District. This request is to permit the construction of a 16 unit, single building condominium, upon the request of J. Allison Associates. (CONTINIIED FROM 8-28-90) 0-92590-11 Director of Planning & Zoning Terry Harrington presented the staff report and recited the history since 1975 of the Planned Unit Development. The property is zoned R-3 with PUD district overlay. The PUD is controlled by the final development plan approved by the Commission and Board rather than by the underlying zoning district. The area is designated as development and consistent with the Future Land Use Map and suggested densities for Planned Residential Development. The request is consistent with Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designation. Mr. Harrington advised that during 1981, there were four amendment to the PUD submitted and approved by the Board. One of the amendments was to move all the townhouses to one side of Kelly Lane to accommodate the steep slope and preserve the upper, right hand side of Kelly Lane as permanent or open green area as designated on the plan. The Planning Commission unanimously recommended denial because September 25, 1990 7 ~ ~ ,, accordance with PUD regulations have not been met because (1) the amendment is not required for the continued support of the PUD (2) there has been no change in conditions since approval of the amended plan justifying further amendment of the PUD (3) there has been no change in the development policy of the community. Mr. James E. Buchholtz, attorney, representing the owner of the property, Mr. Richard Hamlett, advised the board that no map with greenway space was ever recorded. He also advised that the County Assessor's Office made a significant increase in the assessment of this property from $13,500 for 1989 to $110,500 for 1990. This was reduced back to $13,500 by the Board of Equalization at the owner's request after he was advised that he could not develop the property. In response to a question from Supervisor Robers, Mr. Buchholtz advised that the owner reported that the taxes have not been paid. Supervisor Robers moved to deny the ordinance. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None DENIAL OF ORDINANCE 92590-11 AN E%ISTING PLANNED IINIT DEVELOPMENT ON A 2 ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED SOIITH OF BELLY LANE IN THE CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT IIPON THE APPLICATION OF J. ALLISON ASSOCIATES WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on August 14, 1990, and the second reading and public hearing was held on September 25, 1990; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public September 25, 1990 ~ O has no objections as long as the tower does not exceed 50 feet. Supervisor Johnson moved to grant the use not provided for permit. Supervisor Nickens amended the motion to restrict the height of the tower to 50 feet. After discussion, Supervisor Nickens made a substitute motion to approve use as requested with the understanding that documents from FAA be a part of the permit and attest to no problems with the height of the tower. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None ORDINANCE 92590-12 AUTHORIZING A USE-NOT-PROVIDED-FOR PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT A MICROWAVE TOWER LOCATED AT 5673 AIRPORT ROAD IN THE HOLLZNS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT UPON THE APPLICATION OF DOMINION BANRSHARES WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on August 28, 1990, and the second reading and public hearing was held September 25, 1990; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on September 4, 1990; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That a use-not-provided-for permit for a certain tract of real estate containing 8.461 acres, as described herein, and 705 September 25, 1990 thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. On substitute motion of Supervisor Nickens to approve the use as requested with understanding that documents from FAA be a part of the permit and attest to no problems with height of tower, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None 990-5 An ordinance to amend the proffered conditions on 2.25 acres, to construct a retail drive- thru window, located at 4515 Brambleton Avenue, Windsor Hills Magisterial District, upon the request of Springwood Associates. Supervisor Nickens moved to grant the continuance at the request of Springwood Associates Attorney. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisor McGraw, Nickens, Robers NAYS: Supervisors Eddy, Johnson IN RE; SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance rescinding Ordinance 81490-6, imposing or increasing user fees for the Parks and Recreation Department and appropriation of funds. 0-92590-13 In response to questions from Supervisors Eddy, Supervisor Nickens advised that this was a compromise solution. 707 September 25, 1990 held on September 25, 1990. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That Ordinance No. 81490-6 is hereby repealed in its entirety. 2. That the Director of the Roanoke County Department of Parks and Recreation is hereby authorized to establish fees for parks and recreation services and activities, subject to the approval of the County Administrator, and subject to the following standards: a. Definitions: Indirect costs include the general fund appropriation for each of the cost centers associated with the recreation area based on the previous fiscal year budget, plus the allocation of the central administrative costs for the Department of Parks and Recreation, and in the case of athletics, the share of the ballfield maintenance, which is provided by the Parks Division of the Department. Direct costs relate to the specific costs of instructors and associated supplies. The registration fee is proposed to be established at $5 per participant, per activity and the membership fee is proposed to be $10 annually for senior citizens, in lieu of a registration fee. b. Standards• The standards are as follows: i. For youth athletics the general fund of the 70 9 ,, September 25, 1990 to pay and shall implement related policies. 4. That the effective date of this ordinance shall be September 25, 1990. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: Supervisor Eddy 2. Ordinance amending and reenacting Section 21-153, Section 21-157, Section 21-159, Section 21-160, Section 21-162, and Section 21-163, of Article VIII, Tax on Prepared Food and Beverages of Chapter 21 of the Roanoke County Code, Taxation, to increase the criminal penalties for failure to file the required returns or to collect or pay the tas imposed by this article. 0-92590-14 There was no discussion. Supervisor Nickens moved to approve the ordinance. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None ORDINANCE 92590-14 AMENDING AND REENACTING SECTION 21-153, SECTION 21-157, SECTION 21-159, SECTION 21-160, SECTION 21- 162 and SECTION 21-163, OF ARTICLE VIII, TA% ON PREPARED FOOD AND BEVERAGES, OF CHAPTER 21 OF THE ROANORE COIINTY CODE, TA%ATION, TO INCREASE THE CRIMINAL PENALTIES FOR FAILIIRE TO FILE THE REQIIIRED RETIIRNS OR TO COLLECT OR PAY THE TA% IMPOSED BY THIS ARTICLE. WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, by ordinance 51088-8 adopted a tax on prepared food and beverages 71 1 '~ September 25, 1990 Section 21-153. Returns ~;e}~e~g'and remittances generally. Every seller of food with respect to which a tax is levied under this article shall make out a return ~, upon such forms and setting forth such information as the Commissioner of the Revenue may prescribe and require, showing the amount of food charges collected and the tax required to be collected, and shall sign and deliver such return ~e}9e~ to the ~ Treasurer of Roanoke County with a remittance of such tax. Such return g and remittance shall be made on or before the twentieth day of each month, covering the amount of tax collected during the preceding month. Section 21-157. Duty of seller when doing out of business. Whenever any seller required to collect and a~ pay to the County a tax under this Article shall cease to operate or otherwise dispose of his business, any tax payable under this article shall become immediately due and payable and such person shall immediately make a return ~ and pay the tax due. Section 21-159. Enforcement; duty of Commissioner of the Revenue. The Commissioner of the Revenue shall promulgate rules and regulations for the interpretation, administration and enforcement of this article. It shall also be the duty of the Commissioner of the Revenue to ascertain the name of every seller liable for the collection of the tax imposed by this article, who fails, refuses or neglects to collect such tax 713 September 25, 1990 or refuse to file any return t required by this Article ~~e or to remit to the y Treasurer of Roanoke County the tax require to be collected and paid under this Article "'ar~i~'r2 within the time and in the amount specified in this Article ~~z~2, there shall be added to such tax by the Commissioner of the Revenue ~ m~_--~""" of Roanoke County a penalty in the amount of ten (10) percent if the failure is not for more than thirty (30) days, with an additional ten (10) percent of the total amount of tax owed for each additional thirty (30) days or fraction thereof during which the failure continues, not to exceed twenty-five (25) percent in the aggregate, with a minimum penalty of two dollars ($2.00). (b) In the case of a intent to defraud the County ~~~~, a penalty of fifty assessed against the person Section 21-163. Violations of ari false or fraudulent return with of any tax due under this Article (50) percent of the tax shall be required to collect such tax. ~icle. ja) It shall be unlawful and a violation of this Chapter for any person to fail refuse or neglect to comply with any provision of this Article. Such violation shall constitute (i) a Class 3 misdemeanor if the amount of tax levied or assessed in connection with any return required by this Article but unpaid as of the date of conviction is 51,000.00 or less, or jii) a Class 1 misdemeanor if the amount of tax levied or assessed in connection with any return recruited by this September 25, 1990 71 5 ---- n mo ion o Supervisor Nickens to adopt ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None IN RE; OTHER BDSINE88 1. Darrell Shell Scholarship Fund Supervisor Eddy moved to authorize the County Administrator to donate $1,000 to the Darrell Shell Scholarship Fund at Radford University from the Board Contingency Fund. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None 2. Dixie Caverns Landfill Cleanup Supervisor Johnson moved to authorize the County Attorney to go forward with collection efforts regarding Dixie Caverns Landfill cleanup. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None IN RE; ADJOIIRNMENT Supervisor Johnson moved to adjourn at 9:45 p.m. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None Richard W. Robers, Chairman October 9, 1990 ~- 716 Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Roanoke County Administration Center 3738 Brambleton Avenue, SW Roanoke, Virginia 24018 October 9, 1990 The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, met this day at the Roanoke County Administra- tion Center, this being the second Tuesday, and the first regularly scheduled meeting of the month of October, 1990. IN RE: CALL TO ORDER Chairman Robers called the meeting to order at 3:04 p.m. The roll call was taken. MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Richard Robers, Vice Chairman Steven A. McGraw, Supervisors Lee B. Eddy, Bob L. Johnson (arrived at 3:08 p.m.), Harry C. Nickens MEMBERS ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator; John R. Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator of Community Services and Development; Don M. Myers, Assistant County Administrator for Management Services; Paul M. Mahoney, County October 9, 1990 718 NAYS: None RESOLUTION 10990-1 OF•WELCOME TO JAPANESE TEACHERS VISITING ROANORE COUNTY SCHOOL SYSTEM DURING THE MONTH OF OCTOBER, 1990 WHEREAS, it is increasingly important to foster understanding and goodwill between the United States and other nations of the world; and WHEREAS, the Young Japanese Teachers' Program will be placing twenty-five teachers in schools across the Commonwealth of Virginia; and WHEREAS, the Roanoke County School System will be hosting five of these Japanese teachers during the month of October, 1990; and WHEREAS, it is an honor and a pleasure to have these teachers working with our students and helping them learn about Japan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, on behalf of the members of the Board and all the citizens of the County, does hereby extend the warmest welcome and best wishes for a fruitful and pleasant stay to Mari Ozasa, Keizo Yamaguchi, Hitoshi Kasuga, Kiyoshi Katayama and Masahito Saito. On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, •Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None October 9, 1990 7 2 O and social activities for 601 students; and WHEREAS, Glenvar High School, during the past twenty- five years, has been an outstanding example of public education in Roanoke County; and has received numerous honors and awards, among them the President's Excellence Award for Secondary Schools, given by the U. S. Department of Education, for the 1988-89 school year; and WHEREAS, Glenvar High School, during the week of October 7 - 13, 1990, will celebrate its twenty-fifth anniversary hosting many special events in honor of this occasion. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, does hereby, on behalf of its members and all the citizens of the County, extend its congratulations to the students, teachers, and staff of Glenvar High School on the occasion of its twenty-fifth anniversary. FIIRTHER, the Board of Supervisors urges the citizens of Roanoke County to participate in the celebrations planned for the week of October 7 - 13 , 1990. On motion of Supervisor McGraw to adopt resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, 7ohnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None IN RE: NEW BOSINESS 1. Adoption of resolution establishing a policy for continuance and postponement of public hearings for rezonings. October 9, 1990 722 previously scheduled and legally advertised public hearings for changes in zoning classifications, or to voluntarily proffer conditions for conditional zoning, should be received in sufficient time to provide adequate notice to all interested parties. 2. That the applicant may request a continuance or postponement of a previously scheduled and legally advertised public hearing for a change in zoning classification by submitting such a request in writing to the Clerk to the Board of Supervisors no later than noon on the Thursday before the scheduled public hearing date. The Clerk may only grant a single request for a continuance or postponement for the same application for a change in zoning classification. The request shall include an affidavit from the applicant that all parties notified pursuant to Section 15.1-431 of the State Code and all citizens appearing before the Planning Commission on this application have been provided a copy of this request. As a condition of granting this request the applicant hereby agrees to pay all costs and expenses required for any additional legal notice as a result of this request. Failure to comply with these requirements may be deemed by the Board of Supervisors in its sole discretion to constitute a withdrawal of the application for a change in zoning classification. 3. That it is the policy of the County not to grant any additional requests for a continuance or postponement except for an exceptional or unusual occurrence or dire emergency. An October 9, 1990 7 2 4 On motion of Supervisor Eddy to adopt resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None 2. ReQuest to accept and appropriate grant to fund Drug Abuse Treatment for Adult Offenders. This item was postponed at Mr. Hodge's request. 3. Presentation on Computer Aided Real Estate Assessment program. Director of Assessments John Willey presented information on the new Computer Aided Mass Appraisal System (CAMA) and showed examples of commercial and residential appraisals. 4. Review of SDN Report Supervisor Johnson announced that Mr. Carl Marshall of SDN Market Research has revised his report on the possible savings from consolidation. He pointed out that not all errors had been corrected but felt that staff should not spend any more time analyzing the results. In response to a question from Supervisor McGraw, Mr. Hodge advised he had called Mr. Marshall and asked to meet with him to discuss the report, sent the errors they found to Mr. Marshall, and again asked for a meeting. Mr. October 9, 1990 7 2 6 Supervisor Eddy nominated Buford T. Lumsden to represent the Windsor Hills Magisterial District. Supervisor McGraw nominated Edward Kohinke to represent the Catawba Magisterial District. IN RE: CONSENT AGENDA R-10990-4 Supervisor Johnson moved to approve the Consent Agenda. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None RESOLQTION 10990-4 APPROVING AND CONCIIRRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS. SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SOPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM J - CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. that the certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for October 9, 1990, designated as Item J - Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 10, inclusive, as follows: 1. Approval of Minutes - September 12, 1990, September 21-22, 1990 2. Approval of Raffle Permit for the Cave Spring Elementary School PTA 3. Request for acceptance of Viking Drive and Norseman Drive into the Virginia Department October 9, 1990 72 e BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That this matter came this day to be heard upon the proceedings herein, and upon the application of Viking Drive, from the intersection of Craun Lane to the cul-de-sac, a distance of 0.11 miles, and Norseman Drive, from the intersection of Viking Drive to the cul-de-sac, a distance of 0.12 miles to be accepted- and made a part of the Secondary System of State Highways under Section 33.1-229 of the Virginia State Code. 2. That it appears to the Board that drainage easements and a fifty (50) foot right-of-way for said roads have heretofore been dedicated by virtue of a certain map\maps known as Viking Court Subdivision which map was recorded in Plat Book 10, Page 74, of the records of the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Rc~noke County, Virginia, on July 14, 1987 and that by reason of the recordation of said map no report from a Board of Viewers, nor consent or donation of right-of-way from the abutting property owners is necessary. The Board hereby guarantees said right-of-way for drainage. 3. That said roads known as Viking Drive, from the intersection of Craun Lane to the cul-de-sac, a distance of 0.11 miles, and Norseman Drive, from the intersection of Viking Drive to the cul-de-sac, a distance of 0.12 miles, which are shown on a certain sketch accompanying this Resolution, be, and the same are hereby established as public roads to become a part of the State Secondary System of Highways in Roanoke County, only from and October 9, 1990 73 0 of the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, on May 7, 1987 and October 13, 1988 and that by reason of the recordation of said maps no report from a Board of Viewers, nor consent or donation of right-of-way from the abutting property owners is necessary. The Board hereby guarantees said right-of-way for drainage. 3. That said roads known as Chippenham Drive, Shrewsbury Court, and Brentwood Court, which are shown on a certain sketch accompanying this Resolution, be, and the same are hereby established as public roads to become a part of the State Secondary System of Highways in Roanoke County, only from and after notification of official acceptance of said streets or highways by the Virginia Department of Transportation. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None RESOLIITION 10990-4.d REQIIESTING ACCEPTANCE OF FAIRAAY ESTATES DRIVE ZNTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM BF IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That this matter came this day to be heard upon the proceedings herein, and upon the application of Fairway Estates Drive from the intersection of Hidden Valley Drive to the October 9, 1990 132 1. Lawrence Goldstein, 5113 Fox Ridge Drive asked for assistance from the Board of Supervisors in requesting that the Virginia Department of Transportation not use metal guardrails in Hunting Hills, but natural wood guardrails similar to those used on the Blue Ridge Parkway. He advised that the developer is willing to pay for the guardrails, but has not received a positive response. • Mr. Hodge responded he would contact the Virginia Department of Transportation and investigate why VDOT was unwilling to let the developer install natural wood guardrails. 2. Margaret Whitescarver, a County employee with the Library expressed concern about a letter she received from Supervisor Nickens opposing consolidation and asking for a donation for Citizens Against Merger. IN RE: REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS Supervisor Eddy: (1) Asked for a report from County Attorney Paul Mahoney regarding the zoning regulations for parking trailers and campers in front of the building line. Mr. Mahoney recommended changing the ordinance and asked for direction from the Board members. (2) Expressed support for placing an advertisement in the newspaper outlining the facts of the consolidation agreement. October 9, 1990 1 3 4 fees for bingo and raffle permits. Mr. Mahoney advised that a draft ordinance is being reviewed by staff and he will bring an ordinance to the Board for adoption on October 23, 1990 if the review is complete. (7) Asked Mr. Hodge for further information on the County Signal slogan contest. Mr. Hodge will bring more information to the Board. Supervisor McGraw: (1) Complimented the Zoning staff for recent increased enforcement activities. (2) Advised that the Virginia Association of Counties Search Committee will meet on October 12 in Charlottesville and review applications for the Executive Director. (3) Expressed support for the Explore Project even though he appointed a citizen who is opposed to the project to serve on the Explore CItizens Advisory Committee. (4) Asked staff to meet with Roanoke County Airport Commission members to put together a resume of qualifications for appointment to the Commission of an individual from the business community. Mr. Hodge responded he will bring back a report on October 23, 1990. (5) Expressed concern about the personal attacks being used in consolidation discussions. Supervisor Johnson: scout who was attending the meet Supervisor Nickens: regarding ~ letter he sent to stated it was not his intent to introduced David Higgins, a boy =ing. apologized to County employees them opposing consolidation and offend any county personnel. October 9, 1990 73 6 AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None IN RE: CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE SESSION R-10990-5 At 5:24 p.m., Supervisor Robers moved to return to Open Session and certify the Executive Session. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None RESOLUTION 10990-5 CERTIFYING EXECUTIVE MEETING WA3 HELD IN CONFORMITY WITH THE CODE OF VIRGINIA WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia has convened an executive meeting on this date pursuant to an affirmative recorded vote and in accordance with the provisions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and WHEREAS, Section 2.1-344.1 of the Code of Virginia requires a certification by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that such executive meeting was conducted in conformity with Virginia law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby certifies that, to the best of each members knowledge: 1. Only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements by Virginia law were discussed in the ACTION NO. A-102390-8.a ITEM NUMBER ~ ~ -'z AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: October 23, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: Confirmation of Committee Appointments to the Explore Advisory Committee COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The following nominations were made at the October 9, 1990 meeting and should be confirmed by the Board of Supervisors: Explore Advisory Committee Supervisor Eddy nominated Buford T. Lumsden to represent the Windsor Hills Magisterial District. Supervisor McGraw nominated Edward Kohinke to represent the Catawba Magisterial District. RECOMMENDATION It is reco;unended that the above nomination SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED i~. Mary H. Allen Elmer C. Clerk to the Board County A be confirmed. BY: ~ Z~~ Hodge dministrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved (x) Motion by: Bob L. Johnson No Yes Abs Eddy x Denied ( ) Received ( ) Johnson x Referred ( ) McGraw x To ( ) Nickens x Robers x cc: File Explore Advisory Committee File i } "- AT THE REGULA RGINIA,JHELD AT THE ROANORE PCOUNTY ADMINISTRAOTION COUNTY, 1990 CENTER ON TUESDAY, OCTOBER 23, RESOLUTION 102390-8.b REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF MILL TMENT DOF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY ROAD 3YSTEMINIA DEPAR BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That this matter came this day to be heard upon the proceedings herein, and upon the application of Mill Pond Drive, from its west intersection with Millwheel Drive to the end of the cul-de-sac, for a distance of 0.10 miles, and Kings Mill Drive from its west intersection of Millwheel Drive to the end of the cul- de-sac for a distance of 0.12 miles to be accepted and made a part of the Secondary System of State Highways under Section 33.1-229 of the Virginia State Code. 2. That it appears to the Board that drainage easements and a fifty (50) foot right-of-way for said roads have heretofore been dedicated by virtue of a certain map\maps known as Woodbridge Section 11 Subdivision which map was recorded in Plat Book 11, Page 145, of the records of the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, on May 18, 1989 and that by reason of the recordation of said map no report from a Board of Viewers, nor consent or donation of right-of-way from the abutting property owners is necessary. The Board hereby guarantees said right-of- way for drainage. s ~ 3. That said roads known as Mill Pond Drive and Kingsmill Drive and which are shown on a certain sketch accompanying this Resolution, be, and the same are hereby established as public roads to become a part of the State Secondary System of Highways in Roanoke County, only from and after notification of official acceptance of said street or highway by the Virginia Department of Transportation. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to approve resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: 7Y~ c~~~ ~ . G7 Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Phillip Henry, Director, Engineering Arnold Covey, Director, Development & Inspections, and copy for Virginia Department of Transportation ITEM NUMBER ~~._~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE HOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: October 23, 1990 SUBJECT: Acceptance of Mill Pond Drive and Kingsmill Drive into the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Louis S. Waldrop the developer of Woodbridge Seetion 11, requests that the Board of Supervisors approve a resolution to the Virginia Department of Transportation requesting that they accept 0.10 miles of Mill Pond drive and 0.12 miles of Kingsmill Drive. The staff has inspected these roads along with representatives of the Virginia Department of Transportation and find the roads are acceptable. FISCAL IMPACT- No county funding is required. RECOMMENDATIONS• The staff recommends that the Board approve a resolution to the Virginia Department of Transportation requesting that they accept Mill Pond Drive and Kingsmill Drive into the Secondary Road System. /-~ -3 SUBMITTED BY: Phillip T. Henry, P. Director of Enginee ing Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by: APPROVED: ,~,~-~.~ V`v~ ' Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs Eddy Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers ., 9 ~' 'Q NORTA i.4=~ ~ i S[r SwE[T S V) x011 y.1YTE.T xvEe ^ 7W1 EE __. _ _ _•_-- -_-- eue __ fLe3e__3 1 1 EEELr[wT ~ , . -Eses ,,.~ Reba.' CSj ,~aas _ ~ ' s,de~ ' _ ~ ~~` 4 -'_ RexwR ~~ ~ ~ I7./OeMR ~ nsar ~ `' l ~~ _. _~ n.eerevc a , . l: 1~ e ~ ~~ ~ r _ _ , \I r~l~ '. .. \ ~~ylM.7, \\~_'_ ___~~. - wee . , 1 _ IW q00 • I~ ~ n TEt leli ~ ~ t :'~i 1 K~ ~ .MILL .FUH~ DRIVJ e . .~..r+_flA(r . °. `E ~ :•ER4 °a, !::' ea.r •- :. luxe. t, E /c,. ~ :`~ 8 Q.~Y~E+ 1ReEe 1 . -.. / •w' _ - `.~ _ qm _ - qee _ .. tlA . ~, E 3 ' Elazue j/ __~, a nys.vt ..~ ~,.~Rew>)ue~: 4 +q/ae.vr `~; 's b r ~ ~ ~ Isoe-+imnoE ~ ~s ~ ;~' ;~:cvasf A 1 '~•-- - ~~ '~ Ea qq ~ ' ese EEIw ~ ~ ~ :~`d+' ,~ "'' r KINGS~MI~LL; DRI +f ~'~~ ems.. ~ +~. 1 ~~ L ~ ~ t ~ . awEen. rl a . .~eea ~ PB ,PG.r u nn[[. __-- ~ -- + t -: r ~ 5 R ~ .r, ~._ -- ~-~ ', ~ d see. / nooc f :• ~ sER H A K q - 8 ~ ~~' /~ TAX M0. - "TAIL IQ ~ .lA~~ R I : ss.a x-n ssa•z zs - s 1 - \ ' - - - - ~ 1 ._. ,- ~ -~ 1 ~ ww TEm ~, ~~EE.ewEER ~ryATlOeI YAI - •1EiEAAS ~ TAX N0. TAl1 eID. Ew EEEt erEr wEfe Yr/r /feE~E EErr ~~ . ssa-z-i ssci z-t ~'-. 1 ~: 1 ~ ~ s .-E aw ~ r•EE w• .. r.r it w w r w•ErEr ~ 1 • - - - • ~~ w.w a r r r.r e••w r.r r,arw•EEr e 1.. [OG• ~L06EE f E . r.w N•u•r• - r.w ix r.e rrwwr I g ~ - 8 ~ i E w.w erw•w• w.w w.u w. a u•w'+' e i i y w x'Y•.r ! M e..w s:~ a~ ~ ~ ~ ' t ' • '~ E rrEE, w.r ew•erw- Er..r w ww+ s Er..•w- [ s E r.w. .e•u•ET x.w x.r rr rw•vr•+~ 1 W.w Er•w'w' f.Ee iw - !•w. • wye/ I .I 1® jele [ r.r rYw'M' M~ ~ N w.w r rs': [ •~ ~~ Y EN.r w•tl•[T {E~e f.w - r.w . • r'Y'EI [ ~ ~ E.re•~e1e N Ol 1 A [KL re fee.w rrw'er ~- sEJI "'' ft.l:.' iw ~r f>•Y'x' ^ r }I'te! [- ~-•- • a ' 7tlL - ar.r - u•w'w' Y r. >•.r r.w 1.I'r'd l ~_ -- -~EM.e~~_ = - ~ 1 -. t0o0NN~[_ ~. _ '+ x ~ EAUEYn • ~ ias ~ E~-s~I ~ - ~• 66 ! ~. . ~i ~ ~~~~ ~ :-~ l-~ 7irF` ~ _. IR wP-OF~SES:110M 11 f . -"` ' ~ >i~ ~ ~ J ` necr uvran ~DeK. or+ iOM ~ ~ ~ 9 - ~ ! - ~ 4 E s 6 ~ Y 11oNtoE~ C01/11I. Y ~ Z 41eeglR E1REVJ. 1t . ~ IIR ISOM ~s Y w ~ ~ ruooeew. neoeeE ~ ~ . ~p• „ r - J - t f ~ - ' j ~ ~ ._ ' -$~OCK2 .. /xr. ~ ------- - ~ --- we_eei . ~ . .. .- .-- .. EWER ~ s - ~ ~~~~ .-~ .-~~0p _- - t0 Om e7oAO • w~~.Ew f ~ r _ e r Eel/ . - +.E.r - © t s.e.. •rE- ~ .. r,.~- PROPOSED ADDITION SHOMIN IN GRAY DESCRIPTION: ROM THE INTERSECTION OF NILLMIEEL DRIVE (RT. 1187) TO THE CUL-DE-SA . 1) HILL POND DRIVE F OM THE INTERSECTION OF MILLMIEEL DRIVE (RT. 1187) TO THE CUL-DE-SAC. 2) KINGSMILL DRIVE FR LENGTH: (1) 0.10 Milss (2) 0.12 Nibs SO FNt RIGHT OF MAY: (1) 80 FNt (2) 81 Fsst (2) 31 FNt ROADNAY NIDTH: (1) SURFACE NIDTH: (1) 28 FNt (2) 26 Fsst 8ERVICE: (1) 9 Hoses (2) 8 Hon~ss IMPROVEMENT NECESSARY: RECOMMENDATION: ACCEPTANCE OF MILL POND DRIVE A1Vll iC11VlsJr11.L>..1 COMMUNITY SERVICES DRIVE INTO THSECONDARYASYSTEMTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND DEVELOPMENT 3 •- AT THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, OCTOBER 23, 1990 RESOLUTION REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF MILL POND DRIVE AND KINGSMILL DRIVE INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That this matter came this day to be heard upon the proceedings herein, and upon the application of Mill Pond Drive, from its west intersection with Millwheel Drive to the end of the cul-de-sac, for a distance of 0.10 miles, and Kings Mill Drive from its west intersection of Millwheel Drive to the end of the cul-de-sac for a distance of 0.12 miles to be accepted and made a part of the Secondary System of State Highways under Section 33.1-229 of the Virginia State Code. 2. That it appears to the Board that drainage easements and a fifty (50) foot right-of-way for said roads have heretofore been dedicated by virtue of a certain map~maps known as Woodbridge Section ll Subdivision which map was recorded in Plat Book 11, Page 145, of the records of the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, on May 18, 1989 and that by reason of the recordation of said map no report from a Board of Viewers, nor consent or donation of right-of-way from the abutting property owners is necessary. The Board hereby guarantees said right-of-way for drainage. 4 /-~ .~ 3. That said roads known as Mill Pond Drive and Kingsmill Drive and which are shown on a certain sketch accompanying this Resolution, be, and the same are hereby established as public roads to become a part of the State Secondary System of Highways in Roanoke County, only from and after notification of official acceptance of said street or highway by the Virginia Department of Transportation. 5 c ACTION # A-102390-8.c ITEM NUMBER ~ - '`7~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: October 23, 1990 SUBJECT: Acceptance of Water and Sanitary Sewer Facilities Serving Heather Park (Hop-In) COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Developers of Heather Park (Hop-In), Frank R. Radford, have requested that Roanoke County accept the Deed conveying the water and sanitary sewer facilities serving Heather Park (Hop-In) along with all necessary easements. The water and sewer facilities are installed, as shown on plans prepared by T. P. Parker & Son entitled Heather Park, dated March 22, 1989 which are on file in the County Engineering Department. The water and sanitary sewer facility construction meets the specifications and the plans approved by the County. FISCAL IMPACT' The value of the water and sanitary sewer construction is $5,300.00 and $12,500.00 respectively. RECOMMENDATION' Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors accept the water and sanitary sewer facilities serving Heather Park (Hop-In) along with all necessary easements, and authorize the County Administrator to execute a Deed for the transfer of these facilities. SUBMITTED BY: `~ Cli for Cr ig, P.E. Utility 'rector APPROVED: ~' rv ~ c~~~ ~ ~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ACTION VOTE Approved (x) Motion by: Bob L. Johnson No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Eddy x Received ( ) Johnson x Referred McGraw x to Nickens x Robers x cc: File Phillip Henry, Director, Engineering Cliff Craig, Director, Utilities John Willey, Director, Real Estate Assessment _~ r~ s ~~ (~ 2S THIS DEED, DEED OF EASEMENT AND ASSIGNMENT, made this 13th day of _ April 1990 by and between: Frank R. Radford hereinafter referred to as the "Developer," party of the first part; the BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, hereinafter referred to as the "Board," party of the second part; and ELMER C. HODGE, County Administrator of Roanoke County, VIRGINIA, party of the third part. W I T N E S S E T H THAT FOR AND IN CONSIDERATION of the mutual benefits to accrue, the Developer does hereby GRANT, CONVEY, ASSIGN AND TRANSFER, with the covenants of GENERAL WARRANTY OF TITLE, in fee simple unto the Board all water and sewer lines, laterals, valves, fittings, connections, storage facilities, sources of water supply, pumps, manholes and any and all other equipment and appurtenances thereunto, in and to the water and sewer systems in the streets, avenues and public utility and/or sewer line easement areas that have been or may hereafter be installed by the Developer, along with the right to perpetually use and occupy the easements in which the same may be located, all of which is more particularly shown and described and designated as follows, to wit: As shown on the plan entitled Heather Park dated March 22, 19 89 made by T. P. Parker & Son and on file in the Roanoke County Engineering Department. "T The Developer does hereby covenant and warrant that it will be responsible for the proper installation and construction of the said water and sewer systems including repair of surface areas affected by settlement of utility trenches for a period of one (1) year after date of acceptance by the County and wi 11 perform any necessary repairs at its cost. Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator of Roanoke County, Virginia, party of the third part, hereby joins in the execution of this instrument to signify the acceptance of this conveyance pursuant to Resolution No. adopted by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. WITNESS THE FOLLOWING signatures and seals: Developer: Title: ~C.~ J ~~~ State of: County/tatty of: to wit: ~ ~T-h~,foregoing deed was cknowledg d before me this: Q,~ 1?~~ y of 19 ~, gy; 4~.G~/~c.c.-c-~ Duly a orized of icer /~ it le on behalf of ~L/.~,1.c ~ .f' My Commission expires: ~~ ^T Approved as to form: County Administrator of Roanoke County, Virginia County Attorney State of: By Elmer C. Hodge County/City of: to wit: The foregoing deed was acknowledged before me this: day of 19 , by Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator, on behalf of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. Notary Public My Commission expires: _ y .~- •~, NI ~ QE NIQQ~y_ ~ . ~.~ : ~~-r cn .:ac.0 NILL •' Nw~cw ~ A/I] ~ I '" ~ rnrac '" ~, 8 ~ _ `~ 6 /~- `~ a NORT6 `~ x ~~ ,rte \ ~\ \\ sS~ `~ ~~~ .~, .~~ \~ ~. v ~P \~ ~~ ~~ ~,.~~. ~_~ ~-~ ,\ ~•P~ ,ly / lolasaa. COMMUNITY SERVICES Acceptance of Water and Sanitary Sewer Facilities AND DEVELOPMENT Serving Heather Park (Hop-In) , r i ~~`~` AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, OCTOBER 23, 1990 RESOLUTION 102390-8.d EXPRESSING SUPPORT FOR THE DIRECT HIGHWAY LINK BETWEEN THE ROANORE VALLEY AND VIRGINIA TECH WHEREAS, the members of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia have previously gone on record in support of the proposed direct highway connection between Virginia Tech and the Roanoke Valley, and WHEREAS, the Virginia Department of Transportation has included this project in its six-year plan for transportation improvements, and WHEREAS, the Virginia Department of Transportation is continuing preliminary environmental studies on a proposed route. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors reaffirms it support for the highway and urges continued state support for planning, environmental and engineering studies along the proposed route. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None ABSTAIN: Supervisor Eddy A COPY TESTE: .J`~ Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Phillip Henry, Director, Engineering Fred Altizer, Jr., Resident Engineer, VDOT Gordon C. Willis, Sr., Chairman, University Connection John Milliken, Secretary, VDOT Steve Musselwhite, Executive Committee, University Connection ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER ~~ -'S AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: October 23, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: connection between Virginia Tech and Interstate 81 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION The University Connection, a committee established to promote a direct highway link between the Roanoke Valley and Virginia Tech has requested that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors adopt a resolution of support for this project. The committee is made up of elected officials from southwest Virginia and officials from area businesses and organizations. Board Chairman Richard Robers is a member of the Executive Committee. Attached is a letter from the University Connection Chairman Gordon C. Willis, Sr. asking for official support for the highway link. RECOMMENDATION• It is recommended that the attached resolution be adopted by the Board of Supervisors and forwarded to the appropriate officials. ~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ---------------------------------- ACTION Approved ( ) Motion by: Eddy Denied ( ) Johnson Received ( ) McGraw Ref erred ( ) Nickens To ( ) Robers VOTE No Yes Abs K-5 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SIIPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, OCTOBER 23, 1990 RESOLUTION EXPRESSING SUPPORT FOR THE DIRECT HIGHWAY LINK BETWEEN THE ROANORE VALLEY AND VIRGINIA TECH WHEREAS, the members of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia have previously gone on record in support of the proposed direct highway connection between Virginia Tech and the Roanoke Valley, and WHEREAS, the Virginia Department of Transportation has included this project in its six-year plan for transportation improvements, and WHEREAS, the Virginia Department of Transportation is continuing preliminary environmental studies on a proposed route. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors reaffirms it support for the highway and urges continued state support for planning, environmental and engineering studies along the proposed route. 1 ' yp..;"~ K..fi,. v ,r ,, ~~ The Committee to Promote a Direct Highway Link Between the Roanoke Valley and Virginia Tech. 1010 Dominion Bank Building Roanoke, Virginia 24011 October 3 , 199 0 703 982-1010 Executive Committee Gordon Willis, Sr., Chairman Rockydale Quarries Corporation The Honorable Beverly T. Fitzpatrick, Jr., Vice Chairman Roanoke City Council T.A. Carter, Jr. Architect Charles Forbes Virginia Tech John W. Hancock, Jr. Roanoke Electric Steel The Honorable Roger Hedgpeth Mayor, Town of Blacksburg John W. Lambert, Jr. John Lambert Assocates, Inc. Steve Musselwhite Musselwhite & Associates/Shenandoah Life John G. Rocovich, Jr., Esq. Moss &Rocovich, P. C. Brian Wishneff City of Roanoke Committee Members The Honorable Watkins M. Abbitt, Jr. Delegate, Appomattox The Honorable G. Steven Agee Delegate, Salem The Honorable Onico Barker State Senator, Danville The Honorable W.W. Bennett, Jr. Delegate, Halifax The Honorable Rick Boucher Member of Congress Richard Burrows Clearbrook Management Group The Honorable Whittington W. Clement Delegate, Danville The Honorable Joyce K. Crouch Delegate, Lynchburg Bern Ewert Clearbrook Management Group David R. Ford Virginia Tech Mark Heath The Regional Partnership The Honorable Henry F. Jablonski Montgomery County Board of Supervisors The Honorable Harold Linkous Christiansburg Town Council The Honorable 1. Granger Macfarlane Slate Senator, Roanoke The Honorable Joan D. Munford Delegate, Blacksburg The Honorable Jim Olin Member of Congress The Honorable A.L. Philpott Speaker of the House, Bassett The Honorable Richard W. Robers Roanoke County Board of Supervisors The Honorable Todd N. Solberg Montgomery County Board of Supervisors Charles Steger Virginia Tech The Honorable A. Victor Thomas Delegate, Roanoke Dr. PaulTorgersen Virginia Tech The Honorable Clifton A. Woodrum Delegate, Roanoke Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator Roanoke County P.O. 'Box 292300 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 Dear Elmer: As you consider your legislative packages for the 1991 session of the General Assembly, please adopt a resolution of support for the direct highway connection between Virginia Tech and Interstate 81. I am enclosing a draft resolution for your review. Please feel free to modify the language in any way that is more appropriate. Thank you for your consideration. Please call me if I can be of any assistance. Sincerely, Gordon C. Willis; Sr. Chairman P.S. Please send a copy of your resolution to: John Milliken, Secretary Virginia Department of Transportation 202 9th St. Office Building, Room 607 Richmond, Virginia 23219 Steve Musselwhite Musselwhite & Associates 4346 Starkey Road, Suite 1 Roanoke, Virginia 24014 ACTION # A-102390-8.e ITEM NUMBER ~ " AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: October 23, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: Increase of Petty Cash for Youth Haven II COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND: Youth Haven II currently maintains a petty cash fund of $300, in order to cover residents allowances, recreational activities, and emergency purchases. The activity level in this petty cash necessitates an increase from $300 to $500. This increased level of petty cash would allow for a smooth turn around of the reimbursement process. Under the current level of petty cash, the Youth Haven II staff is sometimes at a loss for funds while the petty cash is being reimbursed. This petty cash is audited annually by our independent auditors as well as subject to unannounced audits by the Finance Department in order to assure that it is being used correctly. FISCAL IMPACT: None. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff of the Youth Haven II petty l~ (~+~ 1~,., Diane D. Hyat Director of Finance recommends an increase in the amount cash from $300 to $500. Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs Approved (x) Motion by: Bob L. Johnson Denied ( ) Eddy ~. Received ( ) Johnson x Referred ( ) McGraw x To Nickens x Robers x cc: File Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance Reta Busher DirectorfouthaHaventII Budget Bev Waldo, director, ACTION NO. A-102390-8.f ITEM NO. "~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: October 23, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: Donation of a drainage easement from Norma Jean Holbrook and Glenda Gail Holbrook to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: This consent agenda item involves the donation of a drainage easement from Norma Jean Holbrook and Glenda Gail Holbrook to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors. The easement is located on a tract of land located at 314 Woodmere Drive in the Lindenwood Subdivision. It is shown on a plat made by the Roanoke County Engineering Department, dated August 30, 1990, and designated on the Roanoke County Land Records as Tax Map No. 61.19-7-7. The location and dimensions of this donated easement have been reviewed and approved by the County's engineering staff. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends acceptance of this drainage easement. Respectfully submitted, V'ck a L. H f n Assistant Co my Attorney Action Approved (X) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by Rnh T 7nhnGnn Vote No Yes Abs Eddy x Johnson x McGraw x Nickens x Robers x cc: File Phillip Henry, Director, Engineering Cliff Craig, Director, Utilities John Willey, Director, Real Estate Assessment N-/ COUNTY OF ROANORE, VIRGINIA CAPITAL FUND UNAPPROPRIATED BALANCE Unaudited Beginning Balance at July 1, 1990 $ 9,608 $ 9,608_ Balance as of October 23, 1990 Submitted by Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance N-z COUNTY OF ROANORE, VIRGINIA GENERAL FUND UNAPPROPRIATED BALANCE Amount Unaudited Balance at July 1, 1990 $2,653,756 July 1, 1990 Amount reimbursed by County Schools 500,000 September 25, 1990 Appropriation to Police Department (200,000) September 25, 1990 Rescinding Parks and Recreation User (85,421) Fees Balance as of October 23, 19901 $2,868,335 Submitted by Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance 1 This amount does not include the estimated addition to fund balance from 1989-90 operations of $2,800,000. ~' COIINTY OF ROANORE, VIRGINIA RESERVE FOR BOARD CONTINGENCY Beginning Balance at July 1, 1990 $ 50,000 August 28, 1990 Roanoke County Code Book Supplement (9,845) September 25, 1990 Contribution to TAP - Transitional Living Center (15,000) September 25, 1990 Contribution to Darrell Shell Scholarship (1,000) Balance as of October 23, 1990 $ 24,155 S(u~bmitted by CJ,C,Gr~su ~ . ~~~~r~ Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance i I ~. I ~ III 'I ''~~ ~ ~ i ~ ; I ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~ i i i ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ,~ ~ ~ O O ~ ' i . ~ ~ ~~ ~~ i i I ' I W W t ' I I C7 I-' i ~ ~' ~ lI 'I ',' II ~ .. ~, I N ~, ~~ ' ~i i Ii ~ ', i ~ '~I I .- Ca O H O o l`• I`1 0~^ N v` G~ c O o o ' t»Nmooo ~07 ~ , a 1 1 ~ oN.n O~,O~oo~.-MUII - noNov--Ifl MNMMOJV~~o0o ~ > , I -. 1 ... t» 00 lf1 o tfi o to In o~oN•achW . ~ C ~. a O Y I . . N~~ .O h V M MN ~P-.I~-T~~o N N NMN o , > a I a X Or I ,,. r- r- N h OJ ~ '. OC •~ I ro 7 1 M ^ W 1 N y H N I ?- 'd I ~. 1 1 '. I I I o 07 ur .- V' N V• M ~ O Q' C M O 7 i M ori b G+h oc!`~•o .~U1 to M 6~0.~~Clf1 a' h ~ Co , .:JMM o V'qh ~y~NJM 'U l71 Ul t11MU~Nm ~N _ . tfiM-ol`~~ ~- •OM ~ ac >~ a a I N U I , tfl.Dhco}h ov WMaOMNf Moo00lf1~aiclflM'd• _ _ NfU p` <J'00.-hMM~r Q' 07 ro ao ' .•a C I _ ~ .-cc+N o.- ~ ~c1o.-?.A IfY o~• NN ~ 0~h•NNOJ ~`NIJ1NN~ ~ ~n 0. M C .~ ..• ro I NMM•- , cN pcltth~MhoO+--MOG' MNM NM N _ _ ~, n .-r Cy ro.w 1 a ro 1 o `- v .-h•OJN Lf1MoMN ~NN7 ^ 7 N q' ~ rnroo L 7 L tYl I ~ .. M^N 4N- .n a+ !1J > UF- C I i 0 ~ M .- i ~ ~. I 1 ~. ~ i ao70.~.-~N r-W UIO~M BJ ~tN ~ N ~ ~ ^ 1 •T O~hM•oM V V'. o q.'t11M h~M`a1` ~J~ 1'1hNMf e`r`r M M ' ate .> CIL N 1 a I vMNO~OJVN N^ MttN MM _ ~ c+G,.- V W--o. ~ to V •-•-^ _ - '~ Nf`~c N`aoch N ~ ~' ~ '. O ro O . 7 1 .- , .. .. c N a .- h N G+ h UI a' ~ o c?m. N o 7 ' N ~ ~ ~ N 'O U) ^ C I V. , ~ V1 VY ~ ? -- V h M `~ ~ M C h M ~ O aQ F- a 1 } > I M ' ~ OJN f`N M I , ~ ~ E OL' I ~ ~ ~ ~ ' cL' 4~ ~'JMDJIl1v` h G~ V' :..p .. ~ 'n TNZ 1 ~ . ~ m h-UYN, ~ 0[rut~•III~J u~ V M U1hN ~ . }.WO C £ N 1 O' -o IM . NNNho.fia0 77~ cMM~Y .. ~ ch y O+cM ~h uc h 7 '+- Ty I .-. 7 I , .. . ~aMM.u .. ... N ~ 00 C Ul N N I ,d• ~ 7 .- to 111 . ooh'. N ~ ~ ' N ~ ' O OJ V L C 1 : ~ N'_ ~0~O ~ Ul " ~ .- ' 111 N ~ N ~ ~ ~. ' ' +., V +~ a I C > I ~ , ~ ~ I ~ j .- ~ C C7 , ELL £ a I . ~ a I ~ 'i i '~ ~, c ' No v oooov tf1 7 oOOOOOOO OO ~ c I V• ~' i ', roo ~ ++ I 1 o , o OOOOOOOOO ~ocoo 0000 ~" 'O' oooooooo'ooopOOONOONIti ^ ., 0 0 u) ~ ., i _ 0 00000 _ ^ _ _ ., . ~~oNOOao.-.o N 11 lfl N h o ' I.. C a I [>' I t Lfl 0 - ~ O p c o 0 0 0 0 0 0. o N h M o o •- ~ N m ~, ~ N M h M o0 ~~ N ~, h I`•. ~ LL' '~V 1 hO.oO00O~7 U1. _ _ ~ ~ M M V'~ N N 00 ~''~ ~~' M lt1 ~ '~ O 7 1 . ,. V. N c+ o M M o ' w ~ N ~ M ~ ^ ~ 1 I ~ ~ ~' D M ' r I '~ C ~ i ~+ V ! ~, ' N a ro d N ~, ro V ~ ~, I . ~. ~~ r y E ~ V¢ i o ~i ^~ ~ ~ N ,' C ~- y .., y Ll 4 '. N j ~ O C O I y ,n N ~~ I I ,n C N ~ 3 N ' '. ~ O L 4" ~....r ro a £ 0 ~' N { Ut v 0 a ~ x N _ N a !> V V U j x i ! W v- w- N E 7 ~ a L Q 7 x L Y ro ~ O-~ III lL N L O O. •n ~ O O ' N O N 1' F~ o '. . . U L a C O x 7 ..+ N ~ 1"I a y y .n ro E LL~~. y a' .n O+ > Q Q' F~.. y N N y d 4 . U *+ r O y~ - .. y r0 i, L L ~ .n ro O 'V LL C LL y •n Ul N> O y ,,, N ro r ~~ ': Z N T O y O. ~ LLOem ', , a aYVV vaoey •n rny» t' Rl y .n U L U ~ i C O O U I LL N a y F- .n a x y O C ~'+ N O~ i, L ro L E E to '>7 ~ 0 •. r C ' ' ~ , J H O N .b J Y U ro •w U W N d L ••+ i p U. u. L~ L N O U L y U7 N O IL O L y O a +~ y ro ' •n 1- U y U ++ a +-' 7 4 Q J ~ j , - U N L> N 7 ••~ ~ •n O L C LY1 ~ 4- b C U Dr x ~b ro Y C N ' i ~+ 0. L UI C y ~ w d C N N. y y W U •D b a s •-~ .-. N ~ a L J£ 0... '' O LL y U) V ~ F... . ~ . . . y .-+ to •n ro L N -Nr 7 0 T w 1. C N O O N y 0i N N ti, L Y U 7 7 a 1 •-r y N '~ L N a UI O F- M lfY ~ , .+ N r N ro v +~ W C U •n C E a, t a' .,.~ y O N C C U J] Or > U a ro L L L N U O I L 4- a a a C + 7 C' U L N •n ^' ~ r~ y N L E L r0 + y a L ^ O 2 ~ ' 1 p •n .-+ .n N U C ro •-+ t L .-~ N r+ N E ro N ~n G O y •-~ y a. E~ E N y O L a r Y a L x n Z ~ ~ ro y a~ L •.. a d L a •n T U C N ro Y x "^ ~' o~ L o ro Y o rt c va~oczcnsooor d' K w a'~ a Q ~ ~~. ro o dJU 0pu.£1-021-.QJdILU dLL ~7M~aNM 6 0 C6 C9 r . _ O . o.-No.-.no MMMMM~"`r`rtnN~`O`O'~hmP~ j 0 0 0 o N L Z. o~ ~~ NNNNNNNNNMM o a o 0 0 0 0 0 o a o 0 0 0 0 i o. ~ o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a II ~ ~ i I i I% ~ I ; I ; I, I ; ~ ~ ' I ''N I ~ I~ I o .-. ~ ~ I , ° . ! , °° ' ' ` ~! ' I I I ' i i ' NhU1Mh oN ~ whlfl ~ I I , •O V- I ', ~ 1`1 ' M •- •- ' ' Mo ~ M! o+ 7 M N h o to 0 .- Ul h o M b o~ t ' C ~~ O I; , N ', , W b U1 ~ ., ' ~ . ~ ~ln Op~7N ,,. UiN1~-111b . b M ,~ N , i N E Y I d7\ N fi, 'idN~'` ~ , ,.Mb~ NNM ' G '!NMN:NN N--M NUS N I i ' ' I ~ x V ~1! ' M~. iq . . ~ I ~ ~ ' ~ wcrovl' l j w 7 I! ~ ~ I ~ p N R1 I ', ', ~ I i . I I- 'b ' ro I I i ; ~ f r II I ~ ' ~~ I V 1 ' ~ ~ I o V' ~ Ul ~~, M U1 N o '. U1 b '_ ~' b W~ N N W o i ~- h M ' I i o f o M o C : N 7 a0'. M b ~* . ' .D b M ~ Ul -- M P• M M N N U~ 00 b N ' N o a0 N ~. N I ~' r• .- c+ aD tri . b ~. oD ~ h M cr 0+~ ~ ~ o V'~ . ~ h 111 V. v o b to 4~ o .- 00 b ~ + + ^ _ ^ O N U I ~ ] C I ; N . N ~, In i , ' -- In W h N ~ ~ ' O o Q7 M ~ ~ .,, J ~ t•- to N h ' . c0 M ~ M lh ~ . , (~~'4'M ~ p . p U1 7 Ul b M ' , TfiUI E ro I; -~ I, M ~oNN M ;htt N ltl ,h + M Ul Ul~. N •- . ~ ~NMN Q V ro 7 . b ' ~t N h , _ 'i ~ . C 00 I ~ ~ ~ h M M .- .- ' a N 1 C I ' M t '1 O N - 'U1MbNhN uJ 1^-V'NOON-~- b o0 V•Ut G1 ao. n ~ N 1 In U1 'N~GO o ' o ~aP - M MN _ 0 `ao q• .-obh.-111 ~V'moDt^•M~nf.• b c+oV~ ~ . ~d I' U5 ~.o,- Ul O. N h W Nm~ •- ' o , ~ ^ _ + ^ ^ ^ _ ^ ^ o .7oc+N r•h N M 111 V ~ ~ M Y 7 I ~.. Up I b b ~lno U1 M CO r-'' M ' V.hmhM ', M M~7U7M~~ ~ ~ h V !ro C\ 'O C t- 1 ~~. ~ h~f'1., ~ .v W ' N V' op Ut' p h VM + , m c .. . . • p, - rn u~l w i a ~ 1 ~ O' N O+ I' ~ UY U1 N .D N b h lP h > C p ~ C _ ' Q .- V' ' Q~ lfl O N ,, T b m o; Ut ~ ~ ~ h N a0 b U> b G~ O+ N b lit M o~• •. r C I . o o h M O ~- M M 4~: O' , ' ~ ~c E C L I ~ ro J] I ,- M h r• ~. N ~. c0 CJ .- N ~.. o N •t, ~ b .- V' ~ W ~ h ~ ~ ~ . I O 7 to .- 0.I . ~. ~ N 7 ~ . O W I ~. ' ' ~. ' ~ 7 C I ~ ~ I ' ! ' ^ S O W I , ~~ ~ ~. 'a- UI F- to ~ ~ CJ 0+ : h 7 Ul G~ h V M N b b Ul ~ o Ul V M b M ~ ' O N Z N I o~ ', ~+ '. N Ul o . I W Ul h o6 b ' h V' o 7 0] b o a) U1 r- o+ b M o M ~. i0 ~ ~, I L O ~ I In U•1 ~ Ul M oD ' o b b ~ ' . bMI`1tito i0 d'blllG~bo _ ' . 'T7S ! Y Y 'T7 I bQM r _ ^ _ .. ,7NN. C ^ - I ^ 1 ' ' ' N '~ 4'+ h h 7 b O O+ Ul ~. 00 ' ' C ~^ -J I .-i r~ I L .- ~ b Ul o ~~. m b Ul N ' , ~ V b N, Ul V . d I h t!1 7 m -- M ~' ~ ' 7VQ O C V '~ ~ Y 'D i ~ .- .N OD ~. M .MN N V 'I .- ~' d' ~ ~. ! ~ ~ ~ i ~ c vN ov i , ' ~ i H a . I I ~ ~ x u. S a 1~ i I i ' ~ LLI x 1 ~ ~ , ~ ' ', M ', W ' ~ ', I N N bl b M ~ ' ^ c~ !~~ M •- ~Y, c+ h i` , h h N . n M -- O ° I '~ b ~ .n ' b o 07 R ! R M o ; h ' W , M to -- M V• j ~ r' ' ~ ~ I , ~- •- M . I b I~ h M , , :_ o N i ~ h o, o , ~ op o o b W lP V V• N ~ M + ^ _ _ . ^^ i N '' ~ +~ 1 ~ N I' U1 . Ul + ^ ^ _ _ .. b ' ^ + _ j ^ ~. i U1 N ' _ ~ P M K'..- Ul '~ N 7 h m ~, M .- .- i ~ C 7 ~ I. M M'7hO ~ p .- ~ M .. h ~Nh~, ^ ' N M o ~~C000 N V' o Ut 'O W 'O I: N N '. 07 h 111 N o ~, ri6 V' ~ M +- G1 m m W , ^ I ~ ' L ~ ... p I ' ~ ~ ~ I ~ I ! I <t N N tf' '. ~ i I ' ~ ~ I ,., M ~ I !.,, '. j N W u ro ~ I O U O ' 7 . ..I r N~ I I L 1 , U ~ N~ v ) i~ ~ ~, ~; CD I j p ro ~ c ~ N o ~ , N i ~ TES ~ G E U E ~I ~'' ~ ro ~ I j ~ ~ ~ ... C ~ 4,• C ro O' Q' ~ ~ ! 4- ! N ~ •.~ ~ 4- i li p ~ ~ .-.O > ! ~ C~ wC O ~ I. i ~ b N C a- '°~ ~' ~ ~ ~l U I Q ro 7 x U U r ~ ~ b ro ~' N ro Q N C p. fA O L ~ U ..~ N N W N •.a •.. L L c r N ~. ~ I C ro L ~ L N' . . C i- N • !~ E 7 ~b , .-, > ~" U L a N U 2 L- .-. r L ~ ~-. ~ ! ~ N ~ ':' N LL m ~, C ii Y v ' 7 ' U N C' ~ C N 7 I, ~ N U C E N 7 ro ro C i N N N ' '. ~ ~ ' ~ H > , °b " ' . -~ , N ' ..,:~ ro i9 I , y L N 0~, r O ro d ' ++ ,.+ •.. C •.+ O v1 J D ~ f- U 0. i 1 . ~ w ~ .. ', ++ ro . N 3 i i O K •~ U U N ' , .-+ o ~ ~ C N O C , ! ' ' p .~ ' ~~ N C E ' . [- .. p o i C +tl U. 0 v+ r N N N N ro ~ L I o .~•~ V. •., d• ro' ~ . N . ~ ro O o i , o ~ . N N N v C M '. `D ~ b o i N L r -- ~ L E *'I o ~ O C U t ' C D d ' j" , = S-I Ei o ; ~.+ N U Q' C o 7 E U~ ~ 1 3 L ~~~ C ' - . UI L V- ~ N F+ N ro C ro N ~ N 7 7 i . ~ , ''i O O •"' ' ..~ O O C 7 ~ V U¢Z iJU i ',QN~LW C9 C9 EdN ' Ip JU W ~UU> _ l r o '~ ''~.. o 00111'. '~,oOOOlit~-. 'oU1oUlolno I i NNM ', ', t_ ' p o N M ' I, r- N N', ' ; ~- N M Q ~7 h MMMMMM Q ~ V•. V <Y 7 V' Ul Ul In 0o ~ p . 2 ~ o '~,_r. ~ l . , NNN ' l o o 0 ~ a o 0 0, o 0 0 'ooooo00 ' t o ' a N W ~ o . o 0 0 I i I 'I I i I ~, , ~ ~, ~ I' tS 4 s p c. \j N ~O' o ^ o \'' 0 0 o .- w w', c~ -- ¢¢ o_ o N C O ro ,~ d O L I do d V, ¢ \ O ~ M ro C \ .~ ro G~ •C o U N W a l- U ¢ > C ^ ro L LL a J] O .ac E O 7 4] C U ¢ '. ro C O w 1 [Y ~2 V- N h- o a z L O T 7 ~ r r C~~+J 7 U ¢ ' O C U V a fA d H x U_ w M 4- O O i d' 7 a t I U U) • i ' I ~ ~ ;i ,. i i ~ '; ~ !i i I I •0 0. I' i, ii ~ ~ ~ `O ~ V"~-o~' , ~' I i i it ~om00t-o I i ! I U~~oMUlllll - ~ ~ I i ~, ~ i, srMOOOOO - .-ODOOOOO '', j I ' '- `a. , C D O I'~. , 7.O O+oI MN~111O ~ ca,M P-Mp '~ ~ OD ~. a E r l~ d7X a 1 o',o M ',N ~ N N R Nf~ .a o+ v ~~ M ~-' ' . x U U 1 NMCU I NNNM N. 7r- ~ i ~. ' W C ro •D 1 ~, ~ ~ . Cl N m I ~, I ~I ', I- w ro I I ' ~ r I ~ , ~ 1 V I a I ; ' a~v ' N O V V'I~ ' ~ 'oD ~ ~. M W oooUlo ~ O) Nllto V'od)o O M M M L a 1I NMmaO~ ~ to O OV7U1 N Ul ~ ..-NMN W 71~M +- ~ V• V r-ouoMo V ~ ~ a U I , O, O~oc+ o '~oOJON . , . J] C I ' E ro l~ ` ` ` V w N 7'... ~0 '. ~~ V N~. •- o -c+ ' N'.0 •- o ^• M^N W to N'. M N o •f• 0 0 N ~ W o M ~ M ~ 7.. I a0 '~ In ~-, •- N 111 NMN lil ~, I „~MN In COD 1 . M '~ N ~ ~ ^ 0 ~a 0 u a I C 1 ' ~ Itl ~ I ~ U'i ' MU'i ~ ~ ~ + Ut G~ N '_ ~, N .. .- a L .^ I ~N ~ ~ o M1 tttohNN M N f'1 M OD O ~ N0 I o M m In lP 7 E I ,hoN ~. ~^ O .- tT 0 In . ' r 7 1 ~ U^ I ~ --Mm ~ N . O+Nl11Ul _ 1 U1O~oc+N ~~ NNE Ui N OD W N ', O '. V C F- 1' o h ',I f,- o f` N r- N o+ I Lfl ^' N N u1 ~ C W Y• I N N M N .p dw I! x ' 1 ' W 1 lT a C U I ~~ 'I G~ ~ ^ 'o M1 `n '. M OI .- M N L. ~ v. o~ . v o , ' v c+ v o v ro 1 a• r- V ro D I ' , ~ ~. ~ ~ ~. ', r E I , N ', . N ''~ N N i N 7 I O W I '. '~~ N a I ~I N N USO+o N o u1' r• .o v '. ^ Ul In ~ C~J Q 7 ~ L 1 ~ U7 M ~ ^ ~OJ O M'o N oo0ov0~ U1 o oN ^ - N In N N. , . . v0 M N U~ M .a N ~~ M O) aJ ~., V' 00. M N ~~ In 111 ' L ..~ I r L I . N N ? , ~ 'm O ' p~ ^ N I .- . M. . C'1 ', C C 1' N ~ I I N O a ' ~ (U ,E d I : ~ ~ ,, x I ~. _ W ~ ~ ~ i ' 1~ ~ o tti ~ ~'. L(1 ~. W O G~ ~ M O O N~ M M ~D' O P' ~ N U~ O O O o o v o o o Ul. W m Q` ~ +n '~. V I. M o .- o) v '',m ~ 00 to o to MCU o 0 0 006 ~- N lit ~ ~o , u'. . ~ O o .0 0 0 M o+ ~ ~ ~ r 1 W o M c+. N ! u .- m o 111 ~ I^ ~ 7 pi I ~ .7 0 .- V~ „ M + .. In ~ N w o a0 N o ~ N ' i .- '.O) N' O .- 0 0 N CU o , .a M' 0. o ~O ~ O tf O O N M N ~ ~ ~O h ~ h ' lL L t W -- M t O . , , ^ l fl N C U ~ E ~ y,. d ' ~. N E C . ,ro c ' O ~ E ~ I L ' 'L o Ic m L -~ o ro ' ~ a L o ~ r, a o ~,ti ; Q. ; ,.. ro ~ 7 ro c ,Y , L> i r L iro . a ;c c ~ O r O > a~ 'wECV a i ro rn ' . a mar L .~ c !..• ' ^ o o c a ' T U r a U E r ' O ', ' a L. 3 i C C' U? C ~ a i U ;a . r ~ UI a 3 OTC E a'.ro T .+ ~ dC N ' L . ' a'L O U ro ' W ~O . ••, E O E ~ C a d •~ r r , r i L r x ro + ro ' C U N .. , r 'O r L E •.,. r O> ., L •.+ •.r a L >. W ^ v ^ ' • ~ UI O W a i d 7 a N ^+ d A Gy ¢1 ^ ~ i....•..-. U r • N .• ' a L O C L ~, I m N > N E C 7 W L ' ' ~ N ro ~•• .~. C C >' • ro ', U U, O C ; L ' a a r". C ro E O i a J] T • a O\ ro a v- ¢ a ro U C '. O LL ~ ' I ! N O a L. a ! a ~ W ~' ~ ~ ro i W, >^ C .~ a L U C~ a L a C Z J ..~ > a. UI ¢ r roar S r ~~ r C, 7 .. a, Di r V E !- ' y rd •,•~ r+ U N a 'o ¢ r J i ¢ . 72 ' 0 'M Trop ro ;O C.ro•.+ d p O ar..~ ro L rn T .+ a C a 7 C O O i 1" U', F, .. o { L r •., L N L 7 N ~' C~ a O ~~' ti a0'. O a. tr O N J] ~ '~. 0+ k•-•, ~ ~ O ~ . ...;•.~ L ro , ~ to o N ro '. ~e L ~., r r . ~ o C d C a ~; ,-, o .-. U'. •.. 7 E r o '~ f- ! j . .-. r r .^ N 7 U L .fl N C '" ~ E ro a a a 0 ^ I 7. C O O : ro •~+ N 0 7 I O U a 7 Uw^s n j Ha~~v wE Z '' d~.-.rug ,aJ¢vv i .l , ¢ ' ^ ~! ~ ! ~;ooo'oo ' ~ i i 1i1~.o111O~.O ^I N N M 7 ollloNolllo ^ N M M V' 7 l!1 ' ~ ' U' '~, I. ' Z ' ~ I M ? V• 1f1 lit Ul 111 !n I ^ M 7•. U~ u M1 N M1. N N ' ' ~ O~ 03 O) O W Q+N Q~OCOG+ 0 ! '. i ~ , O O O O~ . 0 0 O', 0 0 O' o 0 0 0 i o O; 0 0 0 0 i LL : ~: I ~ i i ~ I i ~ _ i ~ : , AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, OCTOBER 23, 1990 RESOLUTION 102390-9 CERTIFYING EXECUTIVE MEETING WAS HELD IN CONFORMITY WITH THE CODE OF VIRGINIA WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia has convened an executive meeting on this date pursuant to an affirmative recorded vote and in accordance with the provisions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and WHEREAS, Section 2.1-344.1 of the Code of Virginia requires a certification by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that such executive meeting was conducted in conformity with Virginia law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby certifies that, to the best of each members knowledge: 1. Only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements by Virginia law were discussed in the executive meeting which this certification resolution applies, and 2. Only such public business matters as were identified in the motion convening the executive meeting were heard, discussed or considered by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. On motion of Supervisor Nickens, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYE5: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Mary H. A len, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Executive Session ~iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiitiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii~i~u~ C;~~z..~ Co~~~~ PEARANCE RE VEST AP Q - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ - - AGENDA ITEM NO. - - - _ _ _ - -_ SUBJECT P~+rA~ran '+ - - - _ - - _ _ = I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to = recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so that I may comment.WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, _ _ _ I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FORTH = c c = - RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINE _ _ c c - LISTED BELOW. • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment =_ whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, = and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the -Board to do otherwise. __ _ • S eskers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Ques- p bons of clarification maybe entertained by the Chairman. - _ • All comments must be directed to the Boazd. Debate between a recognized = speaker and audience members is not allowed. c = _ • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. __ • Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments c with the clerk. - _ =_ • INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED = GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION = FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT - - - i = THEM. - - - - PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO DEPUTY CLERK _ _ _ - = NAME rIA~%C%rn~.- ~o sfi ~~a ^~ - - - ~ flr .DY~~6/ed - - - - ADDRESS iso ~ ,o r ., rli;..Y.s... - - - - - - - - - - - - - PHONE ~ y z - / 9 3 9 (~Tv~) - - - - - _ m~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ j~JIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIiIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIiIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII11,1J c ~~`'~~z~h S _ Cemm~r~~s c APPEARANCE REQUEST _ - _ - _ - _ - _ - AGENDA ITEM NO. _ - _ - __ SUBJECT _ - ' Chairman of the Board of Su ervisors to I would like the p recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so that I may comment.WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW. __ c • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment =_ whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. __ c • Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Ques- bons of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. _ c • All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized -_ speaker and audience members is not allowed. c =_ • Both s Bakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. P c • Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments s with the clerk. _ • INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED c GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. __ PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO DEPUTY CLERK NAME ~f ~'~- ~ ~~.~ ADDRESS ~ ~ 1 % ~~ (~~-C~ c.~. ~~ PHONE ~ ~ ~ _ ~~ ~ mllllllilllllllllllllllllllilllllllllllllllilllllllllllllilllllllliillllllllilllllililllilllllllllllllllilllliillllllllllllllllllm VIIIIIIIIilliilllillllllllllillllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllillilllllllllllllilllllillllilllllllllllllll1111111IIII111111II~(J ~JIII C, ~-~ z.e.~s - - ~a m rye `rt- PPEARANCE REQUEST A - _ - - - - - - _ - _ - AGENDA ITEM NO. _ - - _ ~ c /l Z ~v S ~~~N / s l~A r~>9 (~ ~' ~ ~~ ~ __ SUEJECT ~ - _ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter -_ so that I may comment.WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, _ I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE __ ~' T? ~~ T A T F 1TV T~-T~ ~_T T TIiFT TTaTF+ C 1~ECVR L. I `1~~1'~Y./L 1~ L1~iD YJ i/ 1 lalii ~1Jr W/ lI'aJ JJIl'rLV ~~ ~~ ~ _ _ - LISTED BELOW. • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will c decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, ° and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the .Board-to _ do otherwise. • S Bakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Ques- p tions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. __ _ • All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. __ c "' • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. _ __ _ • Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. • INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED _ GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT _ c THEM. _ PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO DEPUTY CLERK _ _ __ _ • NAME ~~ ~ cJ~ i.3 0 ,~ /~ ~ E~ 3~ i c r-~ a N~ y w a,~ ,0 1, ~ N ~' ~'- w -- ADDRESS R a ~ ~" o ~C'r v 1'~ 02 ~~ ~ _ _ _ _ 7~3 ~~~ ~~c~3 PHONE c mllllllllllllllllllllllllillliiiiillllllililillllllllllilliiilllllllllliilllllllllllilllllillllillilllllliliilllllllilllllllllli PPEARANCE REQUEST- ~~ -~~ Z~en~=-= A - = Co Mme r~z`s _ _ - - _ _ - (~ ~,, ~ - AGENDA IT M NO. _ _ _ . - _ -_ SUBJECT - - I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to = recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter _ so that I may comment.WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, - I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE - - RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINE _ -_ _ - - _ - LISTED BELOW. __ • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will = decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, = and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the ma}ority of the Boazd to - - - - - do otherwise. - • Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Ques- =_ Lions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. • All comments must be directed to the Boazd. Debate between a recognized = speaker and audience members is not allowed. __ c - • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. __ c = • Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments __ with the clerk. - • INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED - = GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION = FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT c - _ - = THEM. _ _ - PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO DEPUTY CLERK _ - NAME - - - - - - _ - c - ADDRESS - - _ -_ _ -_ c PHONE ~I~ °~ - ~ ~ `~ c m~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ _ ~ - - cam.---~~~ - APPEARANCE REQUEST _ - _ _ = AGENDA ITEM NO. ~ - _ _ - - SUBJECT ~ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so that I may comment.WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW. _ _ 'Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will c = decide the time limit based on the number of cifizens speaking on an issue, c and will enforce the rule. unless instructed-by the majority of the:Board to - do otherwise. __ _ • Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Ques- tions of clarification may be entertained by the Chauman. Debate between a recognized All comments must be directed to the Board. _ c speaker and audience members is not allowed. • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. _ • Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments s c with the clerk. c =_ • INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION __ FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. _ '- PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO DEPUTY CLERK c NAME ~ ~ V ~ 2 L ~/ ~o ~~ ~ ADDRESS C~Z-~ t' s`r~ ~~~1 ~ 12-~ ~ ~ ... "' PHONE 7 ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ m~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ,_ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, ON TUESDAY, OCTOBER 23, 1990 RESOLUTION 102390-10 SUPPORTING THE DESIGNATION OF PROPERTY OF ROANORE REBOS, INC. AS EXEMPT FROM TAXATION BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF VIRGINIA WHEREAS, Roanoke Rebos, Inc. is a non-profit corporation which provides meeting space for approximately 500 Alcoholics Anonymous (AA) meetings per year and personnel support for recovering alcoholics in the Roanoke Valley; and WHEREAS, Roanoke Rebos, Inc. owns real estate located in the Windsor Hills district of Roanoke County which is occupied by a full time resident manager and which is used as the site for its sponsored AA meetings; and WHEREAS, the real and personal property used exclusively for charitable and benevolent purposes by a qualifying organization shall be exempt from taxation as authorized by Article X, Section 6(a)(6) of the Constitution of Virginia, pursuant to Section 58.1- 3650 of the Code of Virginia, upon action by the General Assembly of Virginia and for so long as such organization is operated not for profit and the property so exempt is used in accordance with the purpose for which the organization is classified; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia has considered the following factors before the adoption of this resolution in support of the tax exempt status of Roanoke Rebos, Inc. as follows: 1. That Roanoke Rebos, Inc. is exempt from federal income taxation pursuant of Section 501(c) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986; and 2. That no current annual alcoholic beverage license for serving alcoholic beverages has been issued by the Virginia Alcoholic Beverage Control Board to Roanoke Rebos, Inc. for use on the organization's property; and 3. That no director or officer of Roanoke Rebos, Inc. is paid any compensation for service in such position with the organization; and 4. That no part of the net earnings of Roanoke Rebos inures to the benefit of any individual. All of the income or assets to fund the services provided by Roanoke Rebos, Inc. is generated by funds received from donations or contributions; and 5. Roanoke Rebos, Inc. provides services for the common good of the public in the form of providing physical locations for meetings of Alcoholics Anonymous and personnel support for recovering alcoholics in the Roanoke Valley; and 6. No part of the activities of Roanoke Rebos, Inc. involves carrying on propaganda or otherwise attempting to influence legislation. Roanoke Rebos, Inc. does not participate in or intervene in any political campaign on behalf of any candidate for public office; and 7. Roanoke Rebos, Inc. has no rule, regulation, policy, or practice which discriminates on the basis of religious conviction, race, sex or national origin; and 8. There are no other criteria, facts or circumstances which this Board of Supervisors deems pertinent to the adoption of this resolution. WHEREAS, a public hearing on this proposed resolution was held on October 23, 1990, five (5) days after publication of notice of such public hearing in the Roanoke Times and World-News on October 17, 1990. THEREFORE, be it resolved by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County as follows: 1. That this Board supports the request of Roanoke Rebos, Inc. for exemption from taxation of its real and personal property pursuant to Article X, Section 6(a)(6) of the Constitution of Virginia and the provision of Chapter 36 of Title 58.1 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended. 2. That the County Administrator is directed to forward a certified copy of this resolution to the members of the General Assembly representing the County of Roanoke and other political jurisdictions within the Roanoke Valley with the request that the proper legislation be introduced in the General Assembly to achieve the purposes of this resolution. 3. The effective date of this resolution shall be October 23, 1990. On motion of Supervisor Eddy to adopt resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Roanoke Valley Legislators Paul Mahoney, County Attorney R. Wayne Compton, Commissioner of Revenue Alfred C. Anderson, Treasurer John Willey, Director, Real Estate Assessment John Turner, Roanoke Rebos, Inc. ~. ~ ACTION NO. ITEM NO . ~a `~~ ' ~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: October 23, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: Roanoke Rebos, Inc. request for resolution in support of tax-exempt status from the General Assembly COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY' Roanoke Rebos, Inc. is again requesting this Board hold a public hearing on the issue of supporting their application for tax-exempt status from the Virginia General Assembly. BACKGROUND' Last year, Roanoke Rebos, Inc. approached this Board regarding the adoption of a resolution in support of their being granted exemption by the General Assembly from real estate taxation on their property located on Garst Mill Road. Because of concerns expressed by the Commissioner of the Revenue, the Board declined to take action in support of any tax-exempt status at that time. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Officials of Roanoke Rebos, Inc. have continued to meet with Mr. Compton and the County Attorney's office in an effort to provide more information about the functioning and operations of this organization. The Commissioner's Office now feels that it has a clearer understanding of the operations of Roanoke Rebos, Inc. and would not oppose their designation as a qualified tax-exempt organization. In order for a bill to be submitted by the first day of the next session of the General Assembly, a public hearing on this application is required by § 30-19.04 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended. The attached resolution lists the various finding the Board shall make in order to support the designation of this property as exempt from taxation by the Virginia General Assembly. ALTERNATIVES' 1. Adopt the resolution supporting the application of Roanoke Rebos, Inc. for tax-exegipt designation by the General ~~'~~~~ Assembly of Virginia as required by law. 2. Refuse to take further action upon this request at this time. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that after the public hearing on the potential designation of property of Roanoke Rebos, Inc. as tax- exempt pursuant to Article X, §6 (a) (6) of the Constitution of Virginia, the Board consider the adoption of the attached resolu- tion. Respectfully submitted, ~~/` ~ ' Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney Action Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by Eddy Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers Vote No Yes Abs 2 +~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, ON TUESDAY, OCTOBER 23, 1990 RESOLUTION SUPPORTING THE DESIGNATION OF PROPERTY OF ROANOKE REBOS, INC. AS EXEMPT FROM TAXATION BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF VIRGINIA WHEREAS, Roanoke Rebos, Inc. is a non-profit corporation which provides meeting space for approximately 500 Alcoholics Anonymous (AA) meetings per year and personnel support for recovering alcoholics in the Roanoke Valley; and WHEREAS, Roanoke Rebos, Inc. owns real estate located in the Windsor Hills district of Roanoke County which is occupied by a full time resident manager and which is used as the site for its sponsored AA meetings; and WHEREAS, the real and personal property used exclusively for charitable and benevolent purposes by a qualifying organization shall be exempt from taxation as authorized by Article X, Section 6(a)(6) of the Constitution of Virginia, pursuant to Section 58.1- 3650 of the Code of Virginia, upon action by the General Assembly of Virginia and for so long as such organization is operated not for profit and the property so exempt is used in accordance with the purpose for which the organization is classified; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia has considered the following factors before the adoption of this resolution in support of the tax exempt status of Roanoke Rebos, Inc. as follows: 1. That Roanoke Rebos, Inc. is exempt from federal income taxation pursuant of Section 501(c) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986; and 3 ~~ . /t~~l~~/ 2. That no current annual alcoholic beverage license for serving alcoholic beverages has been issued by the Virginia Alcoholic Beverage Control Board to Roanoke Rebos, Inc. for use on the organization's property; and 3. That no director or officer of Roanoke Rebos, Inc. is paid any compensation for service in such position with the organization; and 4. That no part of the net earnings of Roanoke Rebos inures to the benefit of any individual. All of the income or assets to fund the services provided by Roanoke Rebos, Inc. is generated by funds received from donations or contributions; and 5. Roanoke Rebos, Inc. provides services for the common good of the public in the form of providing physical locations for meetings of Alcoholics Anonymous and personnel support for recovering alcoholics in the Roanoke Valley; and 6. No part of the activities of Roanoke Rebos, Inc. involves carrying on propaganda or otherwise attempting to influence legislation. Roanoke Rebos, Inc. does not participate in or intervene in any political campaign on behalf of any candidate for public office; and 7. Roanoke Rebos, Inc. has no rule, regulation, policy, or practice which discriminates on the basis of religious conviction, race, sex or national origin; and 8. There are no other criteria, facts or circumstances which this Board of Supervisors deems pertinent to the adoption of this resolution. WHEREAS, a public hearing on this proposed resolution was held 4 J a{. ~ /~/ ~~ ..~ on October 23, 1990, five (5) days after publication of notice of such public hearing in the Roanoke Times and World-News on October 17, 1990. THEREFORE, be it resolved by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County as follows: 1. That this Board supports the request of Roanoke Rebos, Inc. for exemption from taxation of its real and personal property pursuant to Article X, Section 6(a)(6) of the Constitution of Virginia and the provision of Chapter 36 of Title 58.1 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended. 2. That the County Administrator is directed to forward a certified copy of this resolution to the members of the General Assembly representing the County of Roanoke and other political jurisdictions within the Roanoke Valley with the request that the proper legislation be introduced in the General Assembly to achieve the purposes of this resolution. 3. The effective date of this resolution shall be October 23, 1990. 5 ~; . _ -. OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVIINIST~TI~~CENTER,NTY AT A REGULAR MEETING 1990 VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOCT BERN23,AD TUESDAY, ORDINANCE 102390-i1 TON OF APPROXIMAT LYL175 USE PLAN MAP DESIGNATIO CATED SOUTH OF THE INTERSECTAINODN ARE ACRES LO ROUTE 460 AND ROUWEST6OF THE NORFOLR & SOST ICT p,DJACENT TO AND GISTERIAL DI RAILROAD, IN THE CATAWBA MA FROM DEVEI,OpMENT TO PRINggIFICATIONTFROM M 1 TO CHANGE THE ZONINCG~SS FICATION M-2 WITH TO THE ZONING CONDITIONS UPON THE p'POFIROANORE C NTYSTRIA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY e first reading of this ordinance was held on WHEREAS, th and the second reading and public hearing was September 25, 1990, held on October 23, 1990; and, ublic the Roanoke County Planning-Commission held a p WHEREAS, 1990; and, hearing on this matter on October 2- rovided as EREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been p WH required by law. INED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke Coun y, BE IT ORDA Virginia, as follows: e Future Land Use Plan map designation of certain 1, That th to containing approximately 175 acres owned by tracts of real esta and Properties, Inc. George H• Fitzwater, Salem-West Corporation, 612 outh of the intersection of Route 460 and Route and located s & Southern Drive) adjacent to and west of the Norfolk (Barley be changed from Magisterial District Railroad in the Catawba al Industrial; and Development to Princip onin classification of a certain tract of real 2, That the z g acres ( portion of the 125 a estate containing approximately d in paragraph 1 above), as described herein, property identifle -West Corporation and located south of the intersecb- owned by Salem and bounded Y of Route 460 and Route 612 (Barley Drive) tion properties of Mary W. Bohon (DB 629, Page 501), Helen Cox Richards (WB 27, Page 808), a 50' right-of-way, and the remaining property of Salem-West Corporation, in the Catawba Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of M-1, Light Industrial District, to the zoning classification of M-2, General Industrial District. 3. That this action is taken upon the application of the Industrial Development Authority of Roanoke County. 4. That the applicant has voluntarily proffered in writing the following conditions which the Board of Supervisors hereby accepts: a) That the use of the property will be limited to the manufacture and assembly of products. b) That vehicular access will be limited to Route 11/460. No vehicular access will be permitted off of Yale Drive. Rail access will be permitted to the property. c) The height of the principal structures, regulated by the provisions of the ordinance, on the premises shall not exceed 60 feet measured from the ground level at the structure. d) A buffer zone shall be established from any princi- pal structure, or outside storage facility to any property line adjoining existing residentially zoned property. This buffer zone shall be a minimum of 200 feet. e) The measured noise emissions from the facility shall not exceed an average of 80 dba over a 1 hour test period at the property line adjoining any existing residentially zoned or residentially used property. f) Lighting shall be directed away from any adjoining residential property. Lighting poles shall not exceed 40 feet in height measured from the ground and shall not exceed a lumen level of approximately 4 foot candles at the pavement level. 5. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: BEGINNING at Corner 23, an iron pin located in an old fence line and being the common corner with the south line of a 50 foot right-of-way and also, being a common J i corner with Daniel Wentworth Richards; thence, with the south line of said right-of-way in an easterly direction N. 86° 39' 49" E. 951.31' in all to Corner 24, an iron pin; thence, continuing with the east line in a northerly line N. 10° 51' 17" W. 837.94' to Corner 25, an iron pin; thence, leaving said 50 foot right-of-way and with property of Daniel Wentworth Richards, deceased (DB 869, Page 171); thence, in an easterly direction 74° 36' 05" E. 1,493.81' to Corner 26, an iron pin; thence, N. 30° 25' 23" E. 206.00'; thence, N. 17° 20' 23" E. 263.00'; thence, S. 10° 55' 57" E. 2,192.44' (along zoning line) bearing left of Corner 16 and an iron pin; thence, continuing in a westerly direction S. 13° 45' 07" W. approximately 1,192.90 feet to Corner 17; thence to 18 (maple snag) N. 69° 43' 04" W.; thence, N. 76° 46' 26" W. 1,226.95' passing through a gum tree; thence, N. 83° 29' 15" W. 1,562.54' to Corner 20 and existing iron pin; thence, N. 3° 16' 13" W. 369..48' to Corner 21 and existing iron pin; thence, N. 88° 55' 47" E. 433.61' to Corner 22 and white oak tree at spring; thence, N. 7° 14' 53" W. 629.52' to the Place of Beginning (Tax Map Nos. 64.02-2-51, 64.02-2-52, and part of 64.02-2-50). 6. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, On motion of Supervisor ed. raw to adopt ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, w, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None A TESTE: Mar H."Allen, Clerk Roa oke County Board of Supervisors cc: File ~ Arnold Covey, Director, Development & Inspections Terry Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning John Willey, Director, Real Estate Assessment PETITIONER: Industrial Development Authority of Roanoke County CASE NUMBER: 31-10/90 Planning Commission Hearing Date: October 2, 1990 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: October 23, 1990 A. REQUEST This is a request by the Industrial Development Authority of Roanoke County to (1) amend the Future Land Use Plan designation of approximately 175 acres from Development to Principal Industrial, and (2) rezone approximately 125 acres from M-1 to M- 2 for industrial development. These properties are located south of the intersection of Route 460 and Route 612 (Barley Drive), and adjacent to and west of the N & S railroad, in the Catawba magisterial district. B. CITIZEN COMMENTS Three citizens spoke at the public hearing. Mr. Ligon expressed concern for the potential for air and water pollution, and the effect of the proposed use on surrounding property values. He informed the Commission that the site is characterized by large sink holes, and underground springs. Ms. Freeze expressed concerns for traffic on Route 460, and pollution resulting from chemical and waste disposal. She also expressed concern for erosion control and the effect of the proposed access road on her existing driveway on Route 460. Mr. Winslow expressed concern for increased traffic, the potential for airborne pollutants such as fly ash, groundwater pollution, and the effect of the proposed use on surrounding property values. C. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION The Commission asked Mr. Natt, who was representing the IDA if he could respond to some of the concerns of the residents. Mr. Natt stated that the proposed use was considered "state of the art" technology, and that the industry would be permitted and monitored by the Air Pollution Control Board and the Water Quality Control Board. D. PROFFERED CONDITIONS 1. That the use of the property will be limited to the manufacture and assembly of products. 2. That vehicular access will be limited to Route 11/460. No vehicular access will be permitted off of Yale Drive. Rail access will be permitted to the property. 3. The height of the principal structures, regulated by the provisions of the ordinance, on the premises shall not exceed 60 feet measured from the ground level at the structure. `~ % l~ "' 4. A buffer zone shall be established from any principal structure, or outside storage facility to any property line adjoining existing residentially zoned property. This buffer zone shall be a minimum of 200 feet. 5. The measured noise emissions from the facility shall not exceed an average of 80dbA over a 1 hour test period at the property line adjoining any existing residentially zoned or residentially used property. 6. Lighting shall be directed away from any adjoining residential property. Lighting poles shall not exceed 40 feet in height measured from the ground and shall not exceed a lumen level of approximately 4 foot candles at the pavement level. E. COMMISSION ACTION(S) 1. Mr. Winstead moved to approve the land use plan amendment based upon previous policy established by the County, and the previous action of the Board to rezone the property to M-1. The motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: WITT, ROBINSON, MASSEY, WINSTEAD, GORDON NAYS: NONE ABSENT: NONE 2. Mr. Winstead moved to approve the rezoning from M-1 to M- 2 with the proffer of the conditions discussed by Mr. Natt. He commended the staff for allowing the Industrial Development Authority to be the advocate of this request, indicating that it is a more appropriate approach than having the economic development staff be the advocates. He expressed appreciation for the citizen comments, and indicated that the stringent environmental regulation administered by the state and federal governments should address the environmental concerns raised. The motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: WITT, ROBINSON, MASSEY, WINSTEAD, GORDON NAYS: NONE ABSENT: NONE F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE There was no dissenting perspective. G. ATTACHMENTS ~ Concept Plan ~ Vicinity Map ~_ Staff Report Other Terrance Harring n, Secretary Roanoke County Planning Commission ~a qo _ ~ TO: Planning Commission FROM: Terry Harrington Director of Planning DATE: September 27, 1990 RE; Future Land Use Map Amendment Request of the Industrial Development Authority (IDA) of Roanoke County, 175 acres generally located south of Route 460, and west of the Norfolk Southern Railway in the Glenvar Section of Roanoke County. Nature of Request The IDA has submitted a request to modify the future land use map designation for a 175 acre tract located in the Glenvar Section of Roanoke County. (See enclosed map for exact location.) The tract is currently designated as Development in the 1985 Comprehensive Plan. A designation of Principal Industrial is requested. This plan amendment request has been submitted in conjunction with a M- 1 to M-2 rezoning request for 125 of the 175 acres. Approval of the two requests will facilitate the marketing of the 175 acres for industrial purposes. Criteria for Evaluation of Request The 1985 Comprehensive Plan contains Land Use Determinants for each land use designation. These determinants are a valuable tool to evaluate changes to these designations. For this request, the land use determinants for Development and Principal Industrial will be reviewed, and the appropriateness of each for the 175 acre tract will be evaluated. Development Designation. The 175 acre tract is currently designated as Development in the Comprehensive Plan. This category designates areas where the bulk of new residential growth will be directed. Development areas are confined to the urbanizing sections of the county. The adopted Land Use Determinants for Development areas are: Public Facilities Capacity Water and Sewer Availability Environmental Capacity Major Street Access. Urban Sector Each of these determinants are evaluated below. Public Facilities Capacity. The designation is appropriate for locations where adequate public facilities can handle increased population concentrations. The 175 acres lies within the Urban i a9~ Service area and can be effectively served within the standards established for fire and rescue services. The Roanoke County school system advises us that the schools serving this area have adequate capacity to accommodate the residential development of this tract. Water and Sewer Availability This designation is appropriate for areas where water and sewer services are scheduled to serve an urban residential density. Public water and sewer service are not now at the site but can be extended from existing lines in the areas. Sewer service will be available in Mid-1991 with the extension of the Roanoke River Interceptor. Capacity of this line will be limited to a maximum of 100,000 GPD, or until such time that the City of Roanoke upgrades their section of the interceptor. Water service will be limited to 50,000 GPD, unless a water treatment plant is constructed, or a bulk water purchase is arranged with Salem. The ultimate density of any future residential development on this tract would determine the adequacy of these facilities. Environmental Capacity This designation is appropriate for areas where natural land characteristics provide optimum opportunity for urban residential development. The topography, soils, or geologic characteristics of this site will not severely constrain the development of this property for residential development. Maior Street Access This designation is appropriate for locations which have or can provide direct access to a major street. The 175 acre tract does not now have major public street access, but does have direct connection to Route 460, by means of a 50 foot right-of-way. This right-of-way could be developed as a public street leading to the site. Urban Sector Land designated Development should lie within the Urban Services boundary. This tract meets this criterion. Principal Industrial Designation Principal Industrial (PI) designations should apply to those areas that are best suited for the development of major industry. The 1985 Comprehensive Plan delineates five locations for future industrial growth. These areas include the Glenvar Industrial Area; a linear area that lies to the east and south of this site along the Roanoke River and N & S Railway. (See map in the Comprehensive Plan for location.) The 1985 Plan contains 12 determinants that should be used as a guide for designating areas as PI. These are: Existing Land Use Pattern Existing Zoning Potential Industrial Sites '~ ~®-~ Employment Centers Topography Flood Hazard Prevention Resource protection Water Supply Sewer Service Access Transportation Centers Urban Sector Each of these determinants are evaluated below. Existing Land Use Pattern The plan indicates that this designation is appropriate for areas where industries have historically developed. The West Salem/Glenvar area is characterized by numerous industrial uses which lie generally within the area between Route 460 and the Roanoke River. Existing Zoning The PI designation is appropriate where industrial zoning has already been established. This 175 acre tract is now zoned either M-1 or M-2. Potential Industrial Sites The PI designation is appropriate for areas that have been identified as potential industrial sites in the Roanoke County industrial site inventory. This 175 acre tract is included within this inventory. Employment Centers The PI designation is appropriate for locations where there is an abundance of labor intensive industry. Although there are numerous industrial concerns in the West county area, no specific figures on employment levels are available. ToQoaraphy The PI designation is appropriate where the land is generally flat or gently sloping (0-10$ slope). The majority of this 175 acres meets this criterion. Flood Hazard Prevention The PI designation is appropriate for areas outside of the 100 year floodplain. No portion of this tract lies within a 100 year floodplain. Resource protection The PI designation is appropriate for areas where significant natural resources would not be threatened through the development of the site. The 1985 Comprehensive Plan does not designate any significant resources within this 175 acre tract. Water and Sewer Facilities PI designations should be served by adequate water and sewer facilities. As stated in the first section of this report, water and sewer facilities can be extended to the site, but the capacities of these facilities will be limited by design limitations and/or contractual allowances. Access PI designations are appropriate where there are sufficient public street capacities, or where improvements are /f.~ ~i'l.~ - ~ feasible. Currently, this 175 acre tract does not have adequate public street access; however access can be developed using the existing Route 460 frontage of this parcel. Cost of any necessary road upgrades are not known. Transuortation Centers PI designations are appropriate for locations within close proximity to rail, airport, and major street systems. This 175 acre tract abuts a rail line, lies in close proximity to Route 460, and is located approximately midway between Interstate 81 Exits 39 and 40. Urban Sector PI designations are appropriate for locations within the Urban Service areas as designated within the 1985 Comprehensive Plan. This 175 acre tract lies within the Urban service area. Conclusions Based upon the above information, it is clear that the characteristics of this 175 acre tract conform to most of the land use determinants for both the Development and Principal Industrial designations. Water and sewer service and access are the two land use determinants for which conformance can not be ascertained at this time. The specific water and sewer demands for an industry would need to be known prior to ascertaining compliance with this determinant. Likewise, a proposed residential density must be known if a determination is to be made on the availability and capacity of water or sewer for residential development. Access to the site is currently limited due to lack of improved public street frontage. Access for residential or industrial development can be provided over the deeded 50 foot right-of-way, provided resources are available to construct the access. STAFF REPORT CAGE NIIMBER: 31-10/90 PETITIONER: INDOBTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AOTHORITY OF ROANORE COONTY NATIIRE OF REOOEST /©~~ _~ 1 REVIEWED BY: T. HARRINGTON DATB: SEPTEMBER 24, 1990 This is a request by the Industrial Development Authority of Roanoke County (IDA) to rezone a 125 acre tract from M-1 Conditional to M-2. This parcel was zoned M-1 Conditional in early 1990 as part of a County initiative to create a "land bank" of large industrial sites. Conditions currently attached to the tract limit the types of allowable industrial uses, and prohibit industrial access from Yale Drive. (an adjacent residential subdivision street.) Recently, the IDA obtained an option to purchase this land on behalf of an industrial prospect that wishes to acquire the parcel (and an adjacent 50 acres currently zoned M-2) contingent upon rezoning to M-2. The name of the company is not known to County staff. We do know that the proposed use involves a coreless induction casting plant. The steel product produced from this process weighs less than 10 pounds. The entire operation will involve both the casting and assembly of the product. Associated office uses will also be on the site. Employment at the facility is expected to shifts in operation. Whether this figure employment is not known. The planning information on employment characteristics, or percentage of the work force that will market. be in the 300 range, with two represents initial or ultimate staff does not have further such as breakdown by job type, be hired from the local labor Some additional characteristics of the proposed use are known, and these are presented in this report. APPLICABLE REGDLATIONS 1. M-2 zoning is required due to the proposed casting operation. This district allows a wide variety of general industrial uses including steel fabrication. (See Section 21-24-2 (A) (6).) 2. The proposed casting operation will discharge air emissions that are regulated by the Virginia Air Pollution Control Board (VAPCB). Discharge permits for these emissions must be obtained by the prospect prior to commencing operation of the facility. The VAPCB will not begin their formal review of any application submitted until local land use approvals are granted. 3. The proposed casting operation involves industrial waste water discharges. These discharges will be regulated by the State Water Control Board, which must issue a NPDES permit prior to commencement of the operation of the facility. Some pre-treatment of the waste water discharges will occur on site. 4. By-products of the casting and manufacturing operation include non- hazardous sand and scrap metal that must be recycled, or disposed of in an approved sanitary landfill in accordance with Virginia Department of Waste Management Regulations. z 5. Site development plans for the facility must be approved by Roanoke County prior to commencement of construction or any site development activities. VDOT must review and approve any plans for new public streets or improvements to existing streets, prior to construction. SITE CHARACTERISTICS TOPOGRAPHY: The majority of the 125 acres has a flat to gently rolling topography (0 - 10$ slope). More severe slopes of 10 - 20+~ are found in areas near the southern boundary of the property. The topography of the site is suitable for a large scale industrial use. GROIIND COVER: Approximately 60~ of the site lacks any significant mature vegetation. Tree cover includes a mixture of hardwoods located primarily near the southern and western property lines. Orchards were at one time in operation on the northern half of the site. A walk through of the property revealed scattered rock outcroppings. AREA CHARACTERISTICS FIITIIRE GROWTH PRIORITY: The site is located within the Glenvar Community Planning Area (CPA), as designated in the 1985 Comprehensive Plan. This area is designated as a high growth area, with urban services being available in most of the CPA. LAND IISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT In this section, each factor is rated according to the anticipated impact of the proposed action. A scale of 1 through 5 is used. The ratings designate: 1 = positive impact, 2 = negligible impact, 3 = manageable impact, 4 = disruptive impact, 5 = severe impact, and N/A = not applicable. RATING LAND OSE COMPATIBILITY 2 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: 1985 Comprehensive Development Plan has placed this area within a Development land use category. Industrial activities are discouraged in the Development areas. The property lies in close proximity to the Glenvar Principal Industrial Area; one of the five areas designated for County industrial growth in 1985. The applicant has submitted a request to amend the 1985 Comprehensive Plan to designate this 125 acre tract, and an adjacent 50 acres to Principal Industrial. The Principal Industrial designation is a suitable and appropriate designation for the type of facility and operation proposed. (See pgs. 57-63 of the Comprehensive Plan. The rating of this factor is based upon the approval of the land use amendment. If the Comprehensive Plan is not amended to designate this area as Principal Industrial, a rating of "4" would be applied.) 3 SURROIINDING AREA: The general area surrounding this tract is characterized by a variety of land uses. Woodlands, scattered single-family residential and light industrial/distribution activities are located in the area. Retail uses are located along Route 11/460 in this area. A planned residential subdivision (located on Yale Dr.) lies immediately west of the tract. /~9 -~ ~~ 3 3 BITE LAYOUT: The IDA has submitted to the staff a small scale plot plan that shows the generalized configuration of the proposed facility on the site (enclosed). The scale of the plan does not allow detailed analysis or understanding of the relationships between the various uses. We understand that the IDA will present a larger scale plan at your public hearing on October 2. From the plan submitted, we can determine that the proposed use will be constructed in phases. Initial development will include the construction of approximately 140,000 square feet of manufacture and assembly area, with an additional 40, 000 square feet of office space. Future phases will be constructed to the north and west of the initial facility. It is expected that the entire facility will approximate 500,000 square feet in area when completed. A timetable for this phased development is not available to the staff. It appears that at build-out, the facility will be approximately 1000 feet from the terminus of Yale Drive. All site activities and materials shall take place within enclosed buildings. According to representatives of the IDA, the proposed use does not require, nor anticipate any outside storage of raw materials, process by-products, finished products, or equipment. The plan designates a loop-type road system on the site. A parking area for approximately 400 vehicles is shown on the plan, This area is located at the southeast corner of the facility. Minimum parking requirements will be dependent upon standards established in the zoning ordinance. The extent or nature of the proposed grading on the site is not known to the Planning staff at this time. As such, we are unable to make a determination or analysis of the final topography of the site, and its resultant effect on the facility's visibility in the surrounding area. 3 ARCHITECTURE: The architecture of the building is not known at this time. The manufacturing areas of the facility will have pitched roofs, and will approximate 60 feet in height. The zoning ordinance states that the zoning administrator shall have the authority to approve building heights in excess of 45 feet in M-2 districts. The architecture of the facility will incorporate smokestacks and/or towers that are a necessary component of the casting process. The height of these facilities are not known, but are exempt from height limitations under the zoning ordinance. (See section on Air, below.) 3 SCREENING AND LANDSCAPING: No screening and/or landscaping plan has been submitted with this request. Screening shall be required at site plan stage in accordance with Section 21-92 of the zoning ordinance. Due to the scale of the facility, and the large size of the total site, required screening at the property lines will do little to buffer the impact of the use. However, screening and buffering will help to define the limits of the site boundary, and will serve as a recognizable transition zone between uses in the area. IAA AMENITIES: 4 ~ NATORAL FEATQREB: A 1985 subsurface soils investigation of this site found a deep well-drained yellowish red clay. This investigation also revealed numerous sinkholes on the site. The most recent USDA SCS survey determined that surface soils on the property are predominantly silt loam. The prospect is currently conducting an independent professional analysis of the site to obtain more accurate information on the sites geologic (including karst) characteristics. This information is needed by the prospect to insure that the geology and/or other physical characteristics of the site do not prohibit or restrict use of the site for the purposes intended. Aerial photo interpretation of the site's wooded areas reveals a mixture of hardwood species. The Virginia Department of Forestry has advised the staff that they are available to assist the developer of the property with tree preservation, and forest management efforts, if such assistance is requested. In addition they are available to advise and assist the developer/owner with the marketing of timber on the site that will be removed for development. TRANSPORTATION 3 ACCESS: Although the site currently lacks public street frontage, access will be provided to Route 11/460 through the construction of a private access road. This private access road will be constructed within a 50 foot wide deeded dirt and gravel right-of-way that now provides the only access to the site. The design of this private access road will be reviewed and approved by the Department of Engineering at site plan stage of the project. The prospect, County, and VDOT have determined that some improvements to Route 460 will be necessitated to accommodate the access needs of this facility. Roanoke County anticipates the possibility of sharing in the cost of these improvements. VDOT is currently studying the median alignments, and sight distances to determine the exact nature of desired improvements. The plot plan does not show any access from additional public or private streets in the area. If approved, ultimate site development should not allow or incorporate construction, temporary, or industrial access from Yale Drive. 1 RAIL ACCESS: The site lies in close proximity to a N & S rail line near the western property line. The prospect is currently exploring obtaining access to this line, to allow rail delivery of raw materials and other products used in the casting process. The staff understands that sand is one of the materials used in the casting process. (See ~pvlicable Regulations, above) 3 CIRCDLATION: The plot plan submitted shows an access road that loops the facility and provides access to all on-site parking areas. OTILITIEB ~ WATER: The proposed facility requires a public water supply for processing, cooling and domestic purposes. The exact amount of water needed is not known by the planning staff. The Roanoke County Utility Department has advised us that water service is not now at the site but can be provided from an existing booster station near Yale Dr. Current available capacity of this water system is 50,000 GPD. ~ ~ ~ ~-~ . 5 Pressures and flows in this area are adequate for industrial fire flows. Roanoke County anticipates extending public water to the site, should this industrial prospect commit to construction. 3 BEWER: Public sewer is not now at this site but will be extended to the site by mid-1991 with the construction of the extension of the Roanoke River Interceptor. This is a funded project in the County's Utility Fund CIP. Waste water from this proposed use will be handled in two ways. Approximately one-third of the waste water will be derived from processing and domestic uses. This waste will be discharged into a public sewer system for treatment. The remaining two-thirds of the waste water will be derived from the casting, plating and cooling processes associated with the facility. This waste will be treated on-site and discharged directly into the Roanoke River. All treatment and discharge operations will need to be approved by the State Water Control Board. NPDES permits are required to be obtained prior to any discharge of treated effluent. The chemical composition of the waste water prior to treatment is not known by the planning staff. Thermal effects, if any, of the treated waste water that is discharged into the river are also not known. DRAINAGE ~ BASIN: The site is located within the Callahan Branch Drainage Basin. ~ FLOODPLAIN/ STORMWATER MANAGEMENT: The site is not located within a Federally designated floodplain. At site development plan stage, the developer will be required to submit a stormwater management plan. This plan must meet or exceed County standards prior to plan approval and the commencement of construction. PUBLIC SERVICES 2 FIRE AND RESCUE: Fire and rescue services can be provided within acceptable urban service standards. Fire hydrants shall be required at intervals established for industrial areas. N A PARRS AND RECREATION: N/A 3 SCHOOLS: The school system administrative offices have advised us that Glenvar area schools currently have excess capacity. The impact of this use on the school system is difficult to estimate given the lack of information on characteristics of the expected labor force. TAX BASE T A LAND AND IMPROVEMENT VALUE: Current real estate assessment: Approximately $255,200. Value of proposed buildings and improvements is not known by the planning staff. Representatives of the IDA may be able to provide this information to the Commission at your public hearing. N A TAXABLE GROSS SALES/YEAR: Unknown 1 TOTAL EMPLOYEES: Estimated labor force of 300 is anticipated. i~ TOTAL REVENUE TO THE COUNTY/YEAR: See above. ioQo-~ 6 ~ AIR: Particulate and chemical discharges will be controlled with technology approved by the Virginia Air Pollution Control Board (VAPCB). One or more smoke stacks of undetermined height will be incorporated into this facility. The minimum height of the stack(s) will be established by the VAPCB during the permitting process. As stated above, the height of such facilities is exempt from local land use regulation in M-2 districts. Staff at VAPCB has advised us that odors will be a by-product of the process and chemicals used in a coreless induction casting plant. Odors are difficult to define or regulate as part of the VAPCB permitting process. 3 WATER: See discussion of Sewer, above. ~ SOILB: See Natural Features, above. 4 NOISE: Noise impacts associated with this type of facility are not known at this time. Representatives of the IDA did not provide us with information on the noise characteristics of the proposed use. Noise impacts can be mitigated through the acceptance of proffers regulating maximum decibels at the property line. ~ SIGNAGE: Shall be installed in accord with County regulations. PLAN CONSIST$NCY This area is currently designated as Development in the 1985 Comprehensive Plan. Industrial uses are inconsistent with the land use policies and guidelines related to areas designated Development. As stated above, this area and an adjacent 50 acres are proposed for Principal Industrial (PI) designation. If the future land use map is amended to designate this area as (PI), this request will generally comply with the applicable policies and guidelines of the Principal Industrial designation. For example, Policy I-1 advocates maximizing opportunities for industrial uses in PI areas. Policy I-2 advocates the clustering of industrial activities. Policy I-3 specifically advocates new industrial growth in the Glenvar area. Based upon the information available, the staff is unable to ascertain compliance with Policy I-7 which pertains to noise and odor emissions. Likewise, Policy I-9 advocates prohibiting industrial development adjacent to residential areas, unless exceptional design measures are applied. We do not have sufficient information at this time to ascertain the nature of any design measures that shall be employed to mitigate the effects of the use on the Yale Dr. neighborhood. STAFF EVALIIATION STRE~IGTHB 1. Development of the site for the use proposed creates the potential for positive impacts on the County's tax base. 2. The size of the site and its physical characteristics make it very suitable for a large scale industrial use. 3. Rail access adjacent to the site increases its suitability for industrial development. ,~~~'~-~ 4. Development of the site for the use proposed will enhance the Glenvar area employment center advocated in the 1985 Comprehensive Plan. 5. The use will generally comply with the applicable Industrial policies in the 1985 Comprehensive Plan. WEARNESSEB: 1. The noise and odor emission impacts of the proposed use are not known at this time. 2. No proffers have been offered guaranteeing conformance with the submitted plot plan, or the other known characteristics of the use. Elevation of the facility in relation to the existing grade is not known. 3. Stack height and visual appearance of the facility are not known at this time. PROFFERS SIIGGESTED: 1. No vehicle access shall be allowed from Yale Dr. All vehicle access, including construction access shall be limited to/from Route 460. 2. The use of the property shall be limited to a coreless induction casting/manufacturing plant including the associated assembly of products, activities, and office space. 3. There shall be no outside storage of raw materials, manufacturing by- products or waste materials, spare or inoperative machinery, equipment or tools, or finished products. All such items shall be stored within completely enclosed buildings, and shall not be visible from off of the site. 4. No building roof line shall exceed sixty (60) feet in height as defined in the zoning ordinance. 5. Measured noise emissions at any property zoned residential, or used for residential purposes at the time of the approval of this request shall not exceed 80 DbA. Measurements shall be taken at the property line. i ~~~ - ~ _~- _ _'~ ~ ~ ~ :_ ~• ~ ~ ~- __ ~ ,, h .~ ~` ~ P i n ~~~ r ~~ i ~ _' r-• ~ ~` ~ r~~~bJ $ L r-y 3 r ..pp 1 I CI 1 1 •~~ ~~~ p 11 . ~ •' a. rvvv• _ I 11 ~ ~ ^ 11 1 1 11~ 1^1~_~ 4~.^'-~~ P I I 1 1 1 ..1 1 1 S 1 R ~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, OCTOBER 23, 1990 ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION OF APPROXIMATELY 175 ACRES LO- CATED SOUTH OF THE INTERSECTION OF ROUTE 460 AND ROUTE 612 (BARLEY DRIVE) AND ARE ADJACENT TO AND WEST OF THE NORFOLK & SOUTHERN RAIL- ROAD, IN THE CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM DEVELOPMENT TO PRINCIPAL INDUSTRIAL AND TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION FROM M-1 TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION M-2 WITH CONDITIONS UPON THE APPLICATION OF INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AIITHORITY OF ROANORE COIINTY. WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on September 25, 1990, and the second reading and public hearing was held on October 23, 1990; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on October 2, 1990; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the Future Land Use Plan map designation of certain tracts of real estate containing approximately 175 acres owned by Salem-West Corporation, George H. Fitzwater, and Properties, Inc. and located south of the intersection of Route 460 and Route 612 (Barley Drive) adjacent to and. west of the Norfolk & Southern Railroad in the Catawba Magisterial District be changed from Development to Principal Industrial; and 2. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing approximately 125 acres (a portion of the 1 ~' 3. That the owner has voluntarily proffered in writing the following conditions which the Board of Supervisors hereby accepts: a) Facility will be used for a contractors' equipment storage yard as listed under ordinance Sec. 21-24-2A (B) and associated office uses. No other industrial district uses under Sec. 21-24-2A will be permitted. b) Type D screening and buffering shall be installed and maintained along north, west, and south borders. The east border facing VA 311 shall be screened by Type D plantings. c) One Virginia Department of Transportation commercial entranceway only. 4. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: BEGINNING at a point on the west side of Route 311 on the line between Joseph C. Thomas and Burruss Timber Associates, then with Thomas N. 72 deg. 02 W. 300.00 feet to a point; thence a new line through Burruss Timber Associates S. 6 deg. 28' 05" E. 1200.00 feet to a point; thence with another new line S. 72 deg. 02' E. 300.00 feet to a point on the west right-of-way of Route 311; thence with Route 311 the following eight courses: N. 3 deg. 25' W. 207.73 feet; N. 14 deg. 30' W. 128.00 feet; N. 7 deg. 30' W. 155.00 feet; N. 11 deg. 45' W. 108.00 feet; curve to the right (Radius = 1457.4 feet; Bearing = N. 6 deg. 10' W; Chord = 255.00 feet; Arc = 255.33 feet); N. 1 deg. 25' 30" E. 215.00 feet; N. 13 deg. 30' W. 118.00 feet; N. 3 deg. 10' 10" E. 18.50 feet to the point of BEGINNING and containing 7.35 acres. 5. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. 2 ~.t~~~i~~iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii~i~~iii~iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii~~iiiiiiiiiii~ - - APPEARANCE REQUEST _ _ _ _ _ _ j~~~_^ ~ - _ _ _ - _ - AGENDA ITEM NO. _ ~~ l~ ~~~ S ~~ c,.M ~ t ~'2~ = SUBJECT z - _ - _ - _ - - I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so that I may comment.WHE1~T CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE _ _ -_ RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINE __ LISTED BELOW. __ _ • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment = whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, = and will enforce the rule unless instruc#ed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. _ • Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Ques- bons of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. __ • All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized c speaker and audience members is not allowed. • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ~_ • Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. =_ • INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION = FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT c THEM. c PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY A-~ND GIVE TO DEPUTY CLERK - - _ _ _ - NAME~,~ ~ S~ n~ r ~ ,~ _ V AnlO ~un~' _ ADDRESS ~C~ ~Co Cr-~ac~ ~ ~ '_ PHONE 3 ~~ -" ~ 7 3 `' _ - m~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Illllllllllllll~ililllllllll~IIIIIIIII III I IIIIIiII I IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 1111111 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIJ,I1 IIIIIIIIIilllllllllliillllllllll RAN CE REQUEST APPEA _ ;~'1;~ ~ _ AGENDA ITEM NO. ~ _ ~, - ~- SUBJECT ~ ~ ~ ~, ~ ~ ~ ~ t - of the Board of Supervisors to I would like the Chairman • urin the ublic hearing on the above matter c recognize me d g p WHEN CALLED TO THE PODI c so that I may comment. _ _ I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR _ ' RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINE _ - _ _ LISTED BELOW. _ • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment __ whether s Baking as an individual or representative. The chairman will P decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, the rule unless instructed .by-the majority of the Board to and will enforce c do otherwise. • S eskers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Ques- '~ lions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. Debate between a recognized ._ • All comments must be directed to the Board. _ speaker and audience members is not allowed. -_ • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. _ • S eskers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments p = c with the clerk. .~ _ • INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED UP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION GRO FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT c THEM. ASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO DEPUTY CLER PLE - - - - NAME i~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ n' " _ ._ ~ r, ~' ~. c _ \ ,~~ ~i _ ADDRESS ~ ~ ''' ~,, ~ " ~ ; _ _ c PHONE ~ } ~~ _ ; , IIIIIiilliillllllliliilllllllllllllllllllillllllilllllllllllillllllllllllllillllllllllillllllllll mlllllllllllillllllllllllli ,.. .) ...."T AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, OCTOBER 23, 1990 ORDINANCE 102390-12 TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A ~5 4.267 ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF CATAWBA VALLEY DRIVE APPROXIMATELY 1,000 FEET SOUTH OF ITS INTERSECTION WITH CARVINS COVE ROAD, (PART OF TAX MAP NO. 25.00-2-1) IN THE CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF R-E TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF M-2 WITH CONDITIONS UPON THE APPLICATION OF LACY G. ALEXANDER WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on August 28, 1990, and the second reading and public hearing was held October 23, 1990; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on September 4, 1990; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing ~S 4.267 acres, as described herein, and located on the west side of Catawba Valley Drive approximately 1,000 feet south of its intersection with Carvins Cove Road, (Part of Tax Map Number 25.00-2-1) in the Catawba Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of R-E, Residential Estate District, to the zoning classification of M-2, General Industrial District. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of Lacy G. Alexander. 1 3. That the owner has voluntarily proffered in writing the following conditions which the Board of Supervisors hereby accepts: a) Facility will be used for a contractors' equipment storage yard as listed under ordinance Sec. 21-24-2A (B) and associated office uses. No other industrial district uses under Sec. 21-24-2A will be permitted. b) Type D screening and buffering shall be installed and maintained along north, west, and south borders. The east border facing VA 311 shall be screened by Type D plantings. c) One Virginia Department of Transportation commercial entranceway only. 4. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: BEGINNING at a point on the west side of Route 311 (also known as Catawba Valley Drive); thence, N. 83 deg. 31' 55" E. 198.96 feet to a point; thence a new line through Burruss Timber Associates S. 6 deg. 28' 05" E. 1077.93 feet to a point; thence with another new line N. 72 deg. 02' W. 206.34 feet to a point on the west right-of-way of Route 311; thence with Route 311 the following eight courses: N. 3 deg. 25' W. 207.73 feet; N. 14 deg. 30' W. 128.00 feet; N. 7 deg. 30' W. 155.00 feet; N. 11 deg. 45' W. 108.00 feet; curve to the right (Radius = 1457.4 feet; Bearing = N. 6 deg. 10' W; Chord = 255.00 feet; Arc = 255.33 feet); N. 1 deg. 25' 30" E. 215.00 feet; N. 13 deg. 30' W. 118.00 feet; N. 3 deg. 10' 10" E. 18.50 feet to the point of BEGINNING and containing 4.267 acres, all as more particularly shown on a plat dated June 15, 1990, revised September 25, 1990, prepared by John D. Abbott, P.E., C.L.S., entitled "Survey for Alexander & Son Contractors." 5. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. 2 On motion of Supervisor McGraw to adopt ordinance and rezone 4.267 acres, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: Supervisor Eddy A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Development & Inspections Terry Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning John Willey, Director, Real Estate Assessment 3 100' 0' 100' 200' 300' 4001 600' I"~ 200 GRAPHIC SCALE 1-2, N. 3° 25'W., 207.73 ft. 2-3, N. 14° 30' W., 128.00 ft. 3-4, N. 7° 30' W., 155.00 f*. 4-5, N. 11° 45' W., 108.00 ft. 5-6, ARC= 255.33 ft., RAD.= 1457.4 ft., C.B.= N. 6° 10' W., 255.00 ft. 6-7, N. 1° 25' 30" E., 215.00 ft. 7-8, N. 13° 30' W., 118.00 ft. 8-9, N. 3° 10' 10" E., 18.50 ft. REMAINING PROPERTY OF BURRUSS TIMBER ASSOCIATES TAX MAP 25.00-2-I D. B. i 1.85, PG. 743 [/OI S. 6_28_05_'E. ,_I200.00~ 0 / . • DRAINAGE ~- ~ ~ -~ ~- -~ -- _- -_ -- O DITCH ~~"`-"~_... -~ p0~~ ; ..-EVERGREEN TREE - 5' EVERGREEN TREE - 5'~: p 20 s. s. p S.6°2805 E., 1077. g3 op N~, ~ - (~'~ ~_ m ~ OPEN ST FUTURE 60 ~ OR4GE Yj p/ ° ''~ '' fI loop ~ •;,p .~ m N m m BUILDING ~qp FUTUR'~---_J N \ ^ FENCE 4.267A .RFC u SHED STORAGEGE---_~JJJJ BUILDING 60 •p p Q~ VERGREEN S a UBS-5'cc. © •'"""""'"'""°"'~• DECIDUOUS TREES-1"CALIPER,30'c,c, 30•'ENTRANCE© N ^, RT, 311 CATAWBA VALLEY DR. U ,,, O O U U U N u N O ~ O u N N N N U 1 N O O O ~ U U N U 'm - - N - - I O O O O O O - , ' ,j 1 - - V ~, W N N ~° ~° N N N N N N N - O b 1 _ m V N U A u MASON `-E~K 0. B. 1213 , pG 7g ~~, SURVEY FOR ALEXANDER & SON CONTRACTORS FOR REZONING 8 ACRE TRACT 81TUATE ON RT. 311, CATAWBA MAGI8TERIAL D18TRiCT, ROANO.KE COUNTY, VIRGINIA JOHN D, ABBOTT (~ JOB NO.: I SCALE: I_- 200 SEPT. 25 1990 P• E •, C. L.S. Ig90 REVISED ~ NE' CASTLE, VIfiGINIA DATE: JUNE 15, VICINITY MAP NO SCALE PETITIONER: LACY G. ALEXANDER CASE NUMBER: 26-9/90 /69D- j Planning Commission Hearing Date: September 4, 11990/October 23, 1990 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: September 25, A. REQUEST Petition of Lacy G. Alexander to rezone 7.35 acres from R-E to M-2 to construct and operate a contractors office and equipment storage yard, located on the west side of Catawba Valley Drive approximately 1,000 feet south of its intersection with Carvins Cove Road, Catawba Magisterial District. B. CITIZEN COMMENTS Jack Rankin supported petitioner's request by saying: this area is an exception to the rural character of Mason's Cove and the request is in keeping with usages in the vicinity; also the general profile of VA 311 is heavy commercial traffic. Joyce Blevins spoke in support of petitioner and said that the presence of dump trucks in the area have caused a decrease in the number of traffic accidents on Route 311. Danny Cain voiced his support of petitioner saying that his equipment is already there, and it was his equipment that cleaned up the area during the flood of '85. Lois Ferguson agreed with Joyce Blevins' comments regarding the decrease in traffic the roads of snow i n additMon to eh isdhelpsdurhng equipment to clear the flood. Ed Kohinke supported the request by saying it will reduce the amount of traffic on Bradshaw Road. Also, the traffic on VA 311 will not be increased since petitioner's business is already located on 311; just a change in access. He said that the proposed site will yield Mr. Alexander a savings in fuel costs, time and personnel costs. The audience inquired about revising the Comprehensive Plan. The Chairman said that the plan is in the process of being revised this year. C. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION Mr. Winstead said that it was his judgment that the proposal is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The plan is the guideline for land use action that the Board of Supervisors passed as County policy. The Board has placed this area in a Rural Preserve category with the intent that no strip development or strip commercial would occur. And as long as this is the official policy of the County, that is how the Planning Commission should vote. Mr. Robinson agreed and asked that staff work with petitioner to find a suitable location for his business. D. PROFFERED CONDITIONS ~ ~~®4~_ 1) Facility will be used for a contractors' equipment storage yard as listed under ordinance sect. 21-24-2A (B) and associated office uses. No other industrial district uses under sect. 21-24-2A will be permitted. 2) Type D screening and buffering shall be installed and maintained along north, west, and south borders. The east border facing VA 311 shall be screened by type D plantings. 3) One VDOT commercial entranceway only. E. COMMISSIONER~B MOTION, VOTE AND REASON Mr. Winstead moved to deny the request. The motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Winstead, Witt, Robinson, Massey, Gordon NAYS: None ABSENT: None F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE None. G. ATTACIiMENTB: Concept Plan Vicinity Map Staff Report Other ~, Terrance H ringto~, Secretary Roanoke unty Planning Commission .. ~~~~`~ Alexander & Son Contractors EXCAVATING I~ UNDERGROUND UTILITIES 2265 CATAWBA VALLEY DRIVE SALEM, VIRGINIA 24153 (703)384-6271 September 25, 1990 Mr. Terry .Harrington Roanoke County Planning and Zoning Dear Mr. Harrington: In reference to proposed property on Route 311 that is under consideration for rezoning, I agree to proffer the land to include the following: A. One VDOT commercial entranceway only. f ~ B Fiv res zoni g i ee acre ~ ' ~ `~ fe z ) ' nst d f th on na Wight c` acre zone. The above is in addition to all other proffers previously submitted. Sincerely, ,. ._ ~"~ La~"y G. Alexander Alexander & Son Contractors, Inc. ~' .v t`C~Ml, . ~, ,~ v s'~hl COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 714 SOUTH BROAD STREET RAY D. PETHTEL SALEM, 24153 CpMM1551pNER October 9, 1990 Mr. Lacy Alexander Alexander & Son Contractors , 2265 Catawba Valley Drive Salem, VA 24153 ~ogp~S F. C. AtT12ER, JR. RESIDENT ENGINEER P. 0. Box 3071 Salem, VA 24153 re: Proposed Commercial Entrance Route 311 - Roanoke County Dear Lacy: Provided sight distance requirements can be met it appears a commerci entrance can be permitted to serve the tract of land, adjacent to Route 3: in Roanoke County, we have discussed. The entrance would have to meet the standard design criteria as presented in the UDOT manual "Minimum Standards of Entrances to State Highways". Apparently, the nature of your business would require that most of the traffic using the entrance approach from the south. For that reason we will not require a deceleration lane at this time. In the future should traffic into the entrance from the north increase appreciably, VDOT may require that you construct a decel lane to facilitate that movement. An acceleration lane would be of no benifit at this time. If you have any other questions or need additional information, please do not hesitate to call. . Sinc rely, .Iliv~ . L. C. Whitenack High y Permits and Subdivision Specialist, Sr. for: F. C. Altizer, Jr. Resident Engineer LCW/mn TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21ST CENTURY STAFF REPORT CASE NUMBER: 26-9/90 PETITIONER: LACY G. ALEXANDER r`"'. yy~.~ S ~~ t.xd/,w I .,. j 4/ s~ REVIEWED BY: TIM BEARD DATE: SEPTEMBER 4, 1990 Petition of Lacy G. Alexander to rezone 7.35 acres from R-E to M-2 to construct and operate a contractors office and equipment storage yard, located on the west side of Catawba Valley Drive approx. 1,000 feet south of its intersection with Carvins Cove Road, Catawba Magisterial District. NATURE OF RE UO EST a. Conditional request to operate a contractors storage facility for a variety of excavating equipment including trucks, bulldozers, loaders and backhoes. Petitioner also intends to conduct related office activities. b. Attached concept plan and vicinity map describe project more fully. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS a. M-2, General Industrial District, permits a variety of light and general industrial uses. Petitioner has proffered that the facility will be used only for a contractors' equipment storage yard and associated offices. Petitioner has also proffered the installation of type D, screening and buffering along the north, west, and south property borders and type D plantings along the east boundary with VA 311. b. VDOT commercial entrance permit required. c. Site plan review required to ensure compliance with County regulations. d. Petitioner's request is located along VA 311 which is currently proposed by VDOT as a scenic byway. SITE CHARACTERISTICS TOPOGRAPHY: Site is comprised of a rectangular, flat-bottomed basin at the eastern toe of Fort Lewis Mountain. GROUND COVER: Totally forested with hardwood trees ranging from 8" to 16" in diameter including poplar, oak, maple, hemlock, sycamore, hickory, sourwood, dogwood and cucumber. AREA CHARACTERISTICS FUTURE GROWTH PRIORITY: Situated within the Mason's Cove Community Planning Area; designated for limited growth. The site is not located within the urban service boundary. GENERAL AREA is forested. Limited development near proposed site includes manufactured housing, single-family residential and isolated general retail, office, and industrial uses. LAND USE IMPACT ASSESSMENT Rating: Rate each factor according to the impact of the proposed action. Use a scale of 1 through 5. 1 = positive impact, 2 = negligible impact, 3 = manageable impact, 4 = disruptive impact, 5 = severe impact, and N/A = not applicable. ~_ RATING FACTOR COMMENTS ~ ~ ~®_ ~' LAND IISE COMPATIBILITY 5 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: 1985 Comprehensive Development Plan has placed this area within both surface water/flood hazard and Rural Preserve land use categories. The County's resource protection guide advo- cates floodplain and natural drainage corridor protection, specifi- cally regarding safety, property protection, water quality, open space, and balanced ecosystems. Industrial uses such as contractors' equipment storage are prohibited with no compatibility in Rural Preserve. Excluding areas of floodway and 100 year floodplain, the Rural Preserve designation encompasses all parcels east, west, and south of subject site for an average distance of approx. one mile. Roughly bordering on the north is the Mason's Creek Rural Village, within which the proposed use would also be incompatible based on land use determinants and plan policies. The validity of the existing Rural Preserve designation is further supported by the established land use determinants as follows: 1) Existing land use pattern. Forestal uses unquestionably dominate the site. 2) Existing zoning. Rural residential zoning is in effect. 3) Rural residential and institutional areas. Limited, low density residential and institutional uses are permitted. 4) Resource protection. Valuable woodland, open space, critical slope and drainage corridor resources could be detrimentally affected by development. 5) Access. Site is served by a major arterial rather than rural, less traveled roads. 6) Rural sector. Site is located outside the projected urban service area. Although isolated industrial uses are found along the VA 311 corridor, the case for maintaining the Rural Preserve designation is well founded at this location. 3 SURROUNDING LAND: Hardwood forest; heavily traveled major arterial highway; single-family residential. 3 NEIGHBORING AREA: Hardwood forest; heavily traveled major arterial highway; manufactured home and single-family residential; office and general retail. 3 SITE LAYOUT: Proposal features one entrance and ample space to park a large number of vehicles and business equipment. Most of the eastern two-thirds of the site would be cleared to allow construction of three buildings and the necessary parking. Adequate screening and buffering has also been proffered. 3 ARCHITECTIIRE: Concept plan proposes two buildings; one with attached open storage and one open storage shed. Exterior materials include prefabricated metal and limited brick facades; total area approximately 14,400 sq.ft. 3 SCREENING AND LANDSCAPING: Type D screening proffered along north, west, and south borders. Required materials include large and small evergreen trees and evergreen shrubs within a 35 foot buffer yard. East border shall be screened similarly, excluding buffer yard adjoining VA 311. Petitioner intends to salvage as much existing quality timber as possible. 2 AMENITIES: Ample parking available for existing and future needs. Currently petitioner maintains 23 pieces of equipment including 5- 6 pick up, fuel and dump trucks; 17-18 bulldozers, loaders and back- hoes. Adequate space is available for employee and customer parking. { ,.., A /~ ;,,~ 3 4 NATURAL AMENITIES: Eastern two-thirds of site consists of a rectangular basin (approximately 3 feet below road grade) rising to a steep rear slope, all heavily forested. VA Forestry Department has recommended marketing trees removed during proposed development as small saw timber and firewood. Petitioner's site includes land specified as flood hazard and critical slope by the County's resource .protection guide. TRAFFIC 3 STREET CAPACITIES: 1986 ADT on Catawba Valley Drive (VA 311) from VA 419 to VA 779 (7.5 mile segment) was 7,915 vehicles. 18 accidents were reported on the 3.1 mile segment of Catawba Valley Drive from VA 419 to VA 912 (Absalom Smith Road) in 1987. Initially, proposed use is not expected to generate more than 50-60 vehicle trip ends per day. The segment of VA 311 adjoining proposed development is under consideration as a Virginia Byway. 3 CIRCULATION: Petitioner intends to construct one entrance from VA 311 near the northeast corner of proposed site. Concept plan indicates ample access for all private, commercial, and emergency vehicles. Minimum access requirements will necessitate removal of proposed spaces adjoining east side of proposed northernmost building. UTILITIES 2 MATER: Private well necessary. 1985 Community Facilities Plan indicates that this site does not lie within a proposed water service area for horizon year 2003. 2 SEWER: Private septic system necessary. 1985 Community Facilities Plan indicates that this site does not lie within a proposed sewer service for horizon year 2003. DRAINAGE 3 BASIN: Mason Creek. VA Forestry Department has recommended that care be taken to protect water quality due to potential erosion and sedimentation during storms. 4 FLOODPLAIN: Majority of proposed site lies within the floodway fringe of Mason Creek. Proposed structures must be built to an elevation at least one foot above 100 year flood stage. Applicant will be required to floodproof structures and/or acquire flood insurance. PUBLIC SERVICES 2 FIRE PROTECTION: Within established service standard. 2 RESCUE: Within established service standard. N A PARRS AND RECREATION: N A SCHOOLS: TAX BASE ~,/~ ~~-~ 2 LAND AND IMPROVEMENT VALUE: $150,000 TAXABLE GRO88 SALES/YEAR: N/A TOTAL EMPLOYEES: Currently 10; 25 anticipated. TOTAL REVENUE TO THE COUNTY/YEAR: Approximately $1,725 (improved real estate only). ENVIRONMENT 3 AIR: Site design measures should minimize dust problems during construction and operation of all facilities. Dust mitigation techniques should be employed to protect adjacent properties. See suggested proffers. 2 WATER: 2 SOILS: Owner currently has no plans to install underground storage tanks. 2 NOISE: 2 SIGNAGE: PLAN CONSISTENCY This area is designated as Rural Preserve and surface water/flood hazard. Industrial uses such as those permitted in the M-2, General Industrial District are inconsistent with the land use plan map and policies. Although contractors' equipment storage yards are not specifically mentioned, industrial uses other than mining and extraction are prohibited in Rural Preserve. STAFF EVALIIATION STRENGTHS: 1) Proposal affords petitioner the opportunity to consolidate excavating and underground utilities operation at one location. 2) Owner has proffered that the use of the proposed facility will be strictly limited to contractors' equipment storage and associated offices. 3) Owner has proffered type D screening and buffering on the north, south, and west property boundaries and type D plantings adjoining VA 311. WEAKNESSES: 1) Proposal is inconsistent with flood hazard land use guide- lines. 2) Proposal is inconsistent with Rural Preserve land use guidelines. 3) Proposal would negatively impact natural drainage, open space, woodland and critical slope areas. 4) Proposal may negatively impact the opportunity for this portion of VA 311 to obtain Virginia Byway status. PROFFERS SIIGGESTED: 1) Dust minimization measures will be employed during the construction and operation of all site facilities. Existing and suggested proffers would help to mitigate the visual and environmental aspects of this proposal. However, the proffers will not overcome a main deficiency of this request, namely that the proposed land use is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan designations for the area. .~ c---'7't~' .~ /sv1S~-S Z$ ~ ~ RqD IN A~-aR~7 W STN 5'E~-Tc~l t S- ~ - 4~ 1 D~ -,--ut= c-a p;~ of YIR4~~lt~ Q~~ w STN S~.cT-mnl t DS E of T-N~ Rd~s-.1c~rcE c-0~. t~~{ Z o t~1 ~ t~1t1 _ b 2jI N,lLPI LE ~ '~-M3t~ d55ai~A~S N~~©Y ~lau~ PETIT-'TTDnI~ r 3~R-'tS~j Vc1..uN t ~ p~~ t..`( PRbFFEt~ i~ ~c r3D~-'z9 ot~ Sv-PERV-~jcRS o~ QvaNoKt c_o~NTY ~ ~/IR~~M-4 'Z-}~E FaL~aW ~-at~ G.ot1D1T~~wl~j "~ Ta•-t t~ LD*1 ~*1Ct ot= /i -] • 3~ p CrRT< Pb RT~o N of T1Lx PPRt.£1.~ KuM~Q Z~ DO " Z. - I ~ • ~LcrtL-T( v,1-t,~ cj>~= uSE~ t-aR a <..d*t''CiZ~-~~ot~s ~at~~PMtt-dT S`ra2~t Y~2t) A5 y-STE- Ha~E~ D2P~We.~ SE~-i ~o~•l Z1- 7y} - Z.A.. C6~ ea9 s~,oc~A-~ oFF-CT~ ~15E5. NC oT1iEtZ IND~ST~1-~lL t)ISTR~~1' ltsES NN~~ sEG,"T'lOHt Z1 - Z4 - ZA . ~+~+ IL.1. [3ic PEfii`'-~z't"Et~. 2 . ~ `~~- ~ Sc-izE+~t~ya dNC~ t3~F~wr, st~w~ ~ -~s-~.~9 LNG Ms~k-r~-~.IF~ a Lo Ott, ND~N ~ vU1'r~', Ayy Sow r3olt~s• `I"~F ~ey'r 36RDE~ 'i=~-+c-~n1t~ VA 311 S-}~L.L. OE Se-~E'tNE1~ DY T`lPE Q P!-ArT'~tiJGS. /~PS cf ~'4 / ./,/ __ ~ // Su l,m,-~,~~ ~G t>'4 SS ~lrn t~~ er ~'r~` { • • N Y11411.L ~ OITCM ;..EVERGREEN TREE-3 ~, • t 20'e.e ,; 1-2, N. 3' 25'N., 207.73 ft. . 2-3. N. 14' 30' N.; 128.00 ft. •3-4. N. 7. 30' M.. 155.00 ft. 4-5. N. 11' 45' M.. 108.00 ft. 5-6. ARCS 255.33 ft., RAD.^ 1451.1 ft.. C.B.N N. 6' 10' M-, 255.00 ft. 6-7. N. 1. 25' 30' E.. 215.00 ft. 7-8. N. 13' 30' M.. 118.00 ft. 8-9. N. 3. 10' 10' E., 18.50 ft. REMAINING PROPERTY OF BURRUSS TIMBER ASSOCIATES TAX MAP 25.00 - 2- i D.B. 1185 ~ PG• 743 0.8. 1213 , PG ~9 ~~ ~i_~ SURVEY FOR ~CANDER & SON CONTRACTORS fOR REZONING i ACAE TRACT i1T1lATE ON RT. 511. IiiAEriA MAGISTERIAL DIiTRICT~ ROANOKE COUNTY; YIROINIA T.33 ACRES EVERGREEN TREE-s'~~ O 20'e.e. O OI(M •TO•~Y( - ~ 4 3 • ONtOUN N' '•' Qry ` ~; b o A ...-N ... ..~ 2` -DECIDUDUSTREES-I"CALIPER,30't,e, ~30'ENTRANCE~ v v RT, 311 CATAWBA VALLEY DR. Y ~. N ~ $ = Q 4 ~ § O ~ " Y ~ C _ _ , O O O O O ` _ "' N N N N 1 I 1 1 1 O , N ^ 1 N N N N N N r ~ M + ~ ~ ~ 1 1 1 1 I 1 ~ r s 4 ~ ~ -. .. MPS N ,.. ____~EK -~~ ~~~~ -a ao• o' ao• :oo• soo' +oo' soo' I"• x oo' GRAPHIC SCALE 5.6.28'05-E.~ 1200.00' r- . ~ •~. J any sT~ tKC 1~_-._II /VTVA< VO' V{Iltp/N ~~ -"EVERGREEN SF~UBS-3'ca ~ ~~ 1~:: JOHN D. ABBOTT P.E., C.L.S. NE'. CASTLE, VIRGINIA SCALE: I_s 200• GATE: JUNE IS, g90 ~iTl' MAP sscAtE . ~~„ ~ ~ . ~ 1 - ~~ ~~, ,n ~y~[ -~ ~ CATA A _ 1LYf_Di ~~ "' ~ ~ `~ ~ r ~~ NORTB F3URF~s~ TIMBE~Z 4sSOC~o~. COblMUNlI!' SB1tY1CeS ~E rc c~ 2 A1VD DBYBLOPItBNT 2r - o~ - z - i ~ -,' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, OCTOBER 23, 1990 ORDINANCE TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A 7.35 ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF CATAWBA VALLEY DRIVE APPROXIMATELY 1,000 FEET SOUTH OF ITS INTERSECTION WITH CARVINS COVE ROAD, (PART OF TAX MAP NO. 25.00-2-1) IN THE CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF R-E TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF M-2 WITH CONDITIONS UPON THE APPLICATION OF LACY G. ALE%ANDER WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on August 28, 1990, and the second reading and public hearing was held October 23, 1990; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on September 4, 1990; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing 7.35 acres, as described herein, and located on the west side of Catawba Valley Drive approximately 1,000 feet south of its intersection with Carvins Cove Road, (Part of Tax Map Number 25.00-2-1) in the Catawba Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of R-E, Residential Estate District, to the zoning classification of M-2, General Industrial District. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of Lacy G. Alexander. 1 v ~~ ~~ property identified in paragraph 1 above), as described herein, owned by Salem-West Corporation and located south of the intersec- tion of Route 460 and Route 612 (Barley Drive) and bounded by properties of Mary W. Bohon (DB 629, Page 501), Helen Cox Richards (WB 27, Page 808), a 50' right-of-way, and the remaining property of Salem-West Corporation, in the Catawba Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of M-1, Light Industrial District, to the zoning classification of M-2, General Industrial District. 3. That this action is taken upon the application of the Industrial Development Authority of Roanoke County. 4. That the applicant has voluntarily proffered in writing the following conditions which the Board of Supervisors hereby accepts: a) That the use of the property will be limited to the manufacture and assembly of products. b) That vehicular access will be limited to Route 11/460. No vehicular access will be permitted off of Yale Drive. Rail access will be permitted to the property. c) The height of the principal structures, regulated by the provisions of the ordinance, on the premises shall not exceed 60 feet measured from the ground level at the structure. d) A buffer zone shall be established from any princi- pal structure, or outside storage facility to any property line adjoining existing residentially zoned property. This buffer zone shall be a minimum of 200 feet. e) The measured noise emissions from the facility shall not exceed an average of 80 dba over a 1 hour test period at the property line adjoining any existing residentially zoned or residentially used property. 2 ~ 9~ ~-- f) Lighting shall be directed away from any adjoining residential property. Lighting poles shall not exceed 40 feet in height measured from the ground and shall not exceed a lumen level of approximately 4 foot candles at the pavement level. 5. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: BEGINNING at Corner 23, an iron pin located in an old fence line and being the common corner with the south line of a 50 foot right-of-way and also, being a common corner with Daniel Wentworth Richards; thence, with the south line of said right-of-way in an easterly direction N. 86° 39' 49" E. 951.31' in all to Corner 24, an iron pin; thence, continuing with the east line in a northerly line N. 10° 51' 17" W. 837.94' to Corner 25, an iron pin; thence, leaving said 50 foot right-of-way and with property of Daniel Wentworth Richards, deceased (DB 869, Page 171); thence, in an easterly direction 74° 36' 05" E. 1,493.81' to Corner 26, an iron pin; thence, N. 30° 25' 23" E. 206.00'; thence, N. 17° 20' 23" E. 263.00'; thence, S. 10° 55' 57" E. 2,192.44' (along zoning line) bearing left of Corner 16 and an iron pin; thence, continuing in a westerly direction S. 13° 45' 07" W. approximately 1,192.90 feet to Corner 17; thence to 18 (maple snag) N. 69° 43' 04" W.; thence, N. 76° 46' 26" W. 1,226.95' passing through a gum tree; thence, N. 83° 29' 15" W. 1,562.54' to Corner 20 and existing iron pin; thence, N. 3° 16' 13" W. 369.48' to Corner 21 and existing iron pin; thence, N. 88° 55' 47" E. 433.61' to Corner 22 and white oak tree at spring; thence, N. 7 ° 14' 53" W. 629.52' to the Place of Beginning (Tax Map Nos. 64.02-2-51, 64.02-2-52, and part of 64.02-2-50). 6. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. 3 Illlllilllllllllllll~llllllllllililllllllllllllilllllllllllllllilllllllllllllllllllllllll~~l!!1 ~~Ilillll~llllllllllilillllllllllilll _ - _ - - _ _ CE RE UE ST _ E ARAN Q _ _ APP _ _ _ - - - - - - - - _ _ _ AGENDA ITEM NO. E ~~`~~' " - - __ suBJEC . - like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to I would e durin the public hearing on the above matter recognize m g comment.WHEN CALLED TO THE PODI so that I may c _ L GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FORT _ I WIL =_ . I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINE _ RECORD _ -_ __ LISTED BELOW. _ e iven between three to five minutes to comment • Each speaker will b g c akin as an individual or representative. The chairmn an issue, _ whether spe g = decide the time limit based on the number of citizens spea ing o • rce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to _ and will enfo e do otherwise. c • rs will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Ques- _ Speake "" lions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. -' Debate between arecognized _ • All comments must be directed to the Board. _ speaker and audience members is not allowed. nd the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. __ • Both speakers a c • Bakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments Sp _ - with the clerk. _ • INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED = -_ FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION GROUP SHALL OM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT ~ - _ - _ _ THEM. _ _ NT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO DEPUTY CLER PLEASE PRI = NAME ~'R~ ~ ~ '~ =_ -' a~ Rd SaCeim "' r- , Yc~.C~S~ = ADDRESS ~~ ~ ~ PHONE 3`'3`~~ ~' ~~ _ illllllllllllllllllllilillllllilllllillliilllllllllllllllllllllllllllllillllllilll mllllllillllllllllllllllllliillilllllllliil ~JiIIIiIiIIIIIiIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIiIIIIIIIIIIII~IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIiIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII,U _ - _ - _ - _ - _ - APPEARANCE RE UEST _ Q _ - AGENDA ITEM NO. 1 C~~~U~ `~ _ - _ _ _ - __ SUBJECT _ - I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so that I may comment.WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW. __ • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will c decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to __ do otherwise. c • S Bakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Ques- p tions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. • All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. • Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments -_ with the clerk. =_ • INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. __ ~_ PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO DEPUTY CLERK mlllllllllllilillllilllll IIIIIIIIIIiIII 1111 l 11111111ilillllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllillllllllllllllillliilllllllllillllllllln ~,t~~iiiiii~iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii~iiiiiii~iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii~iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii~ _ - _ _ _ _ _ - APPEARANCE REQUEST - _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ = L_ /" l~~ __ AGENDA ITEM NO. I ~ ~tua - _ - _ - SUBJECT - - I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so that I may comment.WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, = I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE - _ RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW. - _ • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to _ = do otherwise. __ c _ • Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Ques- tions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. • All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. __ • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. c • Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. _ _ _ _ • INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT _ THEM. _ _ ~- c PT .F. A SE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO DEPUTY CLERK _ ~, fiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii~iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii~~~~i1'~ IIIIIIIIilllllllllllllllillillllilllll.III1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111~111J Uilllllllllilllllll - _ - _ - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ PE ARAN CE REQUEST _ AP _ _ _ _ _ ~ _ _ ~ - _ ;. - AGENDA ITEM NO. ` ~'`~'l`' _ - _ ~ _ _ ~, _ - ~, - - c:. ~ - _ - - SUBJECT ~ ~ ~" _ - - I would like the hairman of the Board of Supervisors to - reco nine me during the public hearing on the above matter g - WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, c so that I may comment. _ - I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FORT _ - RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINE _ _ _ = LISTED BELOW. _ • ' 1 be iven between three to five minutes to comment Each speaker w~l c whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will s decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, ill enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board #o and w _ _ __ do otherwise. -_ _ • S Bakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Ques- =_ -_ _ - lions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. - Debate between a recognized • All comments must be directed to the Board. _ - speaker and audience members is not allowed. __ ° • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. =_ __ c • Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments _ c with the clerk. - - -_ • INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED _ GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION _ FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT - -_ - i = THEM. _ PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO DEPUTY CLER _ _ _ _ - NAME ~ ,, 5 ~~ ~- ~ ~ S ~~ - _ - - ADDRESS ~~~ ~, ~~ ~~ ~ ~ _ - _ _ ~~,a. ~~ /S3 = PHONE L-S~ ,~ / ~--, _ Illililllll llillllilllllill 1 1 1 1 1 llllllliillillllllllllllllllllliliillllllililllllllllliillllllillllllllllllllllll mlllllllliill ~(JiIIII~II•IIIIIIIIIIIIillillllllllllllllllllllllllllll~IIIIIIIl1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111I _ _ - - _ _ - - ~. - _ ,~ _ APPEARANCE RE QUE S - _ - ~, - ~'~ - `~~ -~ ~ - ~'~' .-; "`" - _ _ - AGENDA ITEM NO. /~~ ~~~ -~~-~ y - - - = SUBJECT ~ - ~ -- ,~ .~. . ~ _ - G ,,/- __ - i1~ ~~ x., .v_ ~ i, _ ~ ~~ - -~ - ~_ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to reco nize me during the public hearing on the above matter so that I may comment.WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, - I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE - - RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES = LISTED BELOW. __ • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment _ whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will c decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, c and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to _- do otherwise. __ • Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Ques- bons of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. - • All comments must be directed to the Boazd. Debate between a recognized c speaker and audience members is not allowed. • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. - • Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments c with the clerk. =_ • INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED = = GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION c __ FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT - - THEM. - - PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO DEPUTY CLERK - - NAME ,,_ ~~, ,~ ,y ~, 4%,~ - ~~ ~~ ' , - - = ADDRESS ~~ ' :~ ~;' ,. , ;, ,~ =;. ~ ~ <~ ~? - - - __ - - PHONE ~ 5 `' J ~' ', mllllllllllililllllllllllllllllllilllllllllllllilllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllliilllllllllllllllllll ~ `' , tiA AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, OCTOBER 23, 1990 DENIAL OF ORDINANCE 102390-13 TO AMEND PROFFERED CONDITIONS ON THE REZONING OF A 2.25 ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED AT 4515 BRAMBLETON AVENUE IN THE WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF B-2, CONDITIONAL, TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF B-2, CONDITIONAL (AMENDMENT TO PROFFERS) UPON THE APPLICATION OF SPRINGWOOD ASSOCIATES WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on April 24, 1990, and the second reading and public hearing was held October 23, 1990; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on September 4, 1990; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law; and WHEREAS, this property was rezoned from R-1, Residential District, and B-1, Office District, to B-2, Business District with proffered conditions, on June 28, 1988. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: DENIED on motion of Supervisor Eddy, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: ~- Mary H. A len, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Development & Inspections Terry Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning John Willey, Director, Real Estate Assessment r i ~~~ °~ ~''~ WOODS, 11OGEBS SC HAZLEGHOVE - ~ lOb FRANKLIN ROAD, S. W. P ~. BOX 720 ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24004-0720 TELEX 3792815 TELECO PIER 703-982-4216 530 MAIN STREET TELEPHONE 703-982-4200 P. O. BOX 560 DANVILLE, VIRGINIA 24543-0560 WRITER'S DIRECT DIAL TELEPHONE TELEPHONE 804-791-1350 TELECOPIER 804-799-3527 982-4252 September 25, 1990 HAND DELIVERED Mr. Richard Robers, Chairman Roanoke County Board of Supervisors 3738 Brambleton Avenue, SW Roanoke, VA 24018 Re: Springwood Associates - Amendment of Proffered Conditions Dear Mr. Robers: The above item is on the agenda for the Board meeting scheduled at 7:00 p.m. tonight. On behalf of our clients, Springwood Associates, we respectfully request that the matter be carried over to the Board's next regularly scheduled meeting. We appreciate your assistance concerning this matter. Yo rs very trul , ~~ ~C - Michael K. Smeltzer MKS/lgb cc: Mr. Stephen D. Freeman M#18902 ~~~ PETITIONER: SPRINGWOOD ASSOC. ~,.r ,~~ ,! /~ CASE NUMBER: 17-4/90 Planning Commission Hearing Date: September 4, 1990 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: September 25, 1990 A. REQUEST (CONT. FROM MAY 1) Petition of Springwood Associates to amend the proffered conditions on 2.25 acres, to construct a retail drive-thru window, located at 4515 Brambleton Avenue, Windsor Hills Magisterial District. B. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION Sandra Lewis and John Lewis voiced the following concerns: additional vehicles during peak hours onto Brambleton Avenue; by allowing a drive-thru facility (higher intensity use) on the front of the property, the entire character of the property is changed-- landscaping is lost and stormwater is increased; the traffic pattern proposed will increase the traffic to the rear of the site near residential properties; decreased property values. She pointed out that at the Board's public hearing of the original request, the petitioners had said they might want to remodel the existing house for office use. But instead, the house was razed and a new building was erected on the site. C. SIGNIFICANT IMPACT FACTORS Circulation: An important part of the amendments requested is to allow a second access point to Brambleton Avenue. This second entrance requested is inconsistent with a County policy to limit the number of access points on arterial highways (highways in excess of 3,000 ADT). This policy is intended to balance the need to maintain the flow of traffic on such highways with the access needs of commercial property. The County has a limitation on entrances when land along an arterial is being subdivided. Since this proposal does not entail a subdivision of property, this standard would not be applied administratively. However, the County has applied this policy in considering other proposed rezonings, and should consider applying that policy in this situation. On-site circulation under the concept plan approved in June 1988, was fairly simply laid out. The access served two parking areas, with a one way loop at the south end providing an exit for the upper parking area. The proposed concept plan adds a drive-thru window with traffic flowing opposite the general pattern on the remainder of the site. The second entrance alleviates some of this problem but conflicts with the one-way loop from the upper parking lot. The combined effect of these changes is to create the potential for traffic to navigate around the entire site unnecessarily to reach their destination. In short, the pattern already approved would become more circuitous and potentially disruptive with the addition of a second entrance and drive-thru facility. This violates a basic rule in parking lot design -- simplicity. For this reason, staff disagrees with the Burrows Corporation's conclusions pertaining to on-site circulation. c~~7 „ ~ d9' ~ - Site Design Standards: According to the County's Street and Off- Street Parking Standards, a set number of stacking spaces are required for specific drive-thru uses. For a bank, eight spaces are required for the first drive-thru window, with two spaces for each additional window. Based on the modified concept plan submitted, this requirement could not be met. Other aspects of the site design, such as travel lane widths and landscaping, would be verified at site plan review. D. PROFFERED CONDITIONS 1) The conditions previously proffered shall remain in full force and effect with the exception of the additional proffers hereinafter set forth. 2) The property will be developed in accordance with the concept plan made by Balzer and Assoc., dated May 3, 1988, and amendment thereto dated February 21, 1990, except for such changes as may be required by the site plan review. 3) There will be no restaurants on the property using a drive-thru facility. 4) There will be no "fast food restaurants" on the property. "Fast food restaurants" shall be defined as McDonalds, Hardees, Burger King and Wendys. 5) There will be no restaurant of any kind in building D on the property. 6) There will be no convenience market on the property. E. COMMISSIONER'S MOTION, VOTE AND REASON Mr. Gordon moved to deny the petition saying that the project is too close to a residential area and voiced his concerns; potential problem of light glare, sight distance problem, possible traffic problems with additional entrance onto Brambleton Avenue. Mr. Winstead agreed saying that the Board of Supervisors had approved a higher intensity use than what was presented to the residents, and the proposal for a drive-thru facility exacerbates the problem. The motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Winstead, Witt, Robinson, Massey, Gordon NAYS: None ABSENT: None F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE None. G. ATTACHMENTS: ~, Concept Plan Vicinity Map Staff Report Other ~~ Terrance rri gt Secretary Roanoke unty P anning Commission ~ ~ -~ M E M O R A N D U M TO: Planning FROM: DATE: Commission Jon Hartley August 31, 1990 RE: Petition ofi Springwood Associates to amend the proffered conditions on 2.25 acres, to construct a retail drive- through window, located at 4515 Brambleton Avenue (Route 221), Windsor Hills Magisterial District. BACKGROUND The petitioner is requesting to modify the concept plan which was proffiered as a condition ofi approval in June 1988 when the property was rezoned from R-1 and B-1 to B-2, General Business. The modifications proposed would add a retail drive-through facility in the basement of the building being reconstructed on the site of the original house. In addition, they are requesting a second entrance to serve the entire development. This second entrance has already been installed in violation ofi the 1988 proffered concept plan and the approved site plan. According to the petitioner, however, VDOT has given verbal. approval for this entrance. It is also shown on the plans for the widening of Brambleton Avenue. The June 1988 concept plan is attached and is marked "Attachment A", while the modified concept plan proposed is marked "Attachment B". A Traffic Impact Report by Burrow Corporation of Roanoke has been prepared in conjunction with this request, and is .also enclosed. Also attached are additional proffer ofi conditions proposed in response to concerns voiced by residents at a community meeting back in March 1990. STAFF EVALUATION In evaluating this request, staff has focused only on those factors afifected by the proposed changes in the proffiered concept plan and the additional proffered conditions proposed. Based on staff's evaluation this would be limited primarily to the following potential issues: Street Capacities: In 1986, the number of average daily trips (ADT) on Brambleton Avenue was approximately 12,910 vehicles. In 1986 the ADT along Colonial Avenue (Rt. b87) near its intersection with Brambleton Ave. was approximately 5,049. Between Jan. 1987 and Feb. 1988 one accident was reported at the intersection ofi Colonial and Brambleton Avenues. The estimated number of daily trips, based on the 1988 plan, would be approximately 1000 ADT. With the added drive-through fiacility this could generate an additional 300 ADT for a Bank ~~~ or 1000 trips for a fast food establishment. Given the existing level of traffic and the planned improvements to this section of Route 221, the proposed changes will have a negligible impact on street capacities. Circulation: An important part of the amendments requested is to allow a second access point to Brambleton Avenue. This second entrance requested is inconsistent with a County policy to limit the number of access points on arterial highways (highways in excess of 3,000 ADT). This policy is intended to balance the need to maintain the flow of traffic on such highways with the access needs of commercial property. The County has a limitation on entrances when land along an arterial is being subdivided. Since this proposal does not entail a subdivision of property, this standard would not be applied administratively. However, the County has applied this policy in considering other proposed rezonings, and should consider applying that policy in this situation. On-site circulation under the concept plan approved in June 1988, was fairly simply laid out. The access served two parking areas, with a one way loop at the south end providing an exit for the upper parking area. The proposed concept plan adds a drive through window with traffic flowing opposite the general pattern on the reminder of the site. The second entrance alleviates some of this problem but conflicts with the one-way loop from the upper parking lot. The combined effect of these changes is to create the potential for traffic to navigate around the entire site unnecessarily to reach their destination. In short, the pattern already approved would become more circuitous and potentially disruptive with the addition of a second entrance and drive-through facility. This violates a basic rule in parking lot design -- simplicity. For this reason, staff disagrees with the Burrows Corporation's conclusions pertaining to on-site circulation. Site Design Standards: According to the County's Street and Off-Street Parking Standards, a set number of stacking spaces are required for specific drive-through uses. For a bank, eight spaces are required for the first drive-through window, with two spaces for each additional window. Based on the modified concept plan submitted, this requirement could not be met. Other aspects of the site design, such as travel lane widths and landscaping, would be verified at site plan review. Storm Water Management: Since the approval of the site plans for this project, the County standards have been revised for storm water management. According to the Department of Engineering, additional storm water management may be required for the site. This would also be evaluated during site plan review. J'r" i09o-G, Additional Profifiered Conditions: In June 1988, the petitioners proffered as conditions a restriction on a number of uses including, car dealerships, motels, and flea markets. They also proffered conditions on the architecture, lighting, landscaping, and amount of signage. With this petition, in addition to adding a refierence to the modified concept plan, they propose to prohibit any restaurant with a drive-through facility, prohibit fast food restaurants (defined specifically as McDonalds, Hardees, Burger King and Wendys), and prohibit any restaurant in building "D". These conditions are intended to address concerns of neighbors raised at a March 1990 Community Meeting. Staff recommends that the concept plan be modified to show building "D" if they intend to restrict its use. In addition the staff recommends that the proffer dealing with fast food restaurants be rejected unless the specific reference to franchises is stricken and replaced with a more generic definition of "fast food" which refers to meals served in disposable containers. SUMMARY It is the staff's opinion that the site as approved in 1988 is a well formulated layout for traffic circulation and access. The petitioner now wish to modify the site with a drive-through facility and second entrance which were not incorporated into the original layout. These changes contradict County policy and good site design, and therefore the staff recommends denial of this request. w / ~', ~. ~. TRAFFIC IMPACT REPORT Concerning BRAMBLETON COMMONS PROJECT Within ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA by Burrow Corporation of Roanoke April 25, 1990 ~7 TRAFFIC IMPACT REPORT FOR BRAMBLETON COMMONS PROJECT BACKGROUND: Springwood Associates rezoned 2.25 acres located at 4515 Brambleton Avenue in Roanoke County, Virginia, in June, 1988. The property was rezoned from R-1 and B-1 to B-2, General Business, at that time. The B-2, General Commercial District, permits a variety of mixed commercial and offices uses. The site is currently under construction using a tiered lot configuration with five (5) buildings containing first floor retail uses and second floor office uses. The five buildings cumulatively will offer 10,500 square feet retail space and 10,500 square feet office space. The County staff has reviewed the traffic conditions gener- ated by the site as it was rezoned in June, 1988, and we concur in their traffic analysis. The current configuration and anticipated uses would generate about 1,000 trip-ends per day. (Trip-ends are defined as having either the trip's origin or destination on the site.) CURRENT SITUATION: Springwood Associates is now requesting that the original site plan be altered to allow a drive-through facility in the basement of a building being reconstructed on the site of a house originally located on the property; and, a second entrance on the southern end of the property to serve the entire development. The proposed new drive-through facility will generate about 300 additional trip-ends per day. The new second entrance/exit proposal on .the south end of the property will allow an addi- tional ingress/egress alternative located over 200 feet from the original, northern entrance. The County staff has raised concerns that the drive-through facility may not have enough "stacking" distance to adequately accommodate the drive-through. Additionally, the staff has implied the second entrance and drive-through together may create poorly coordinated and potentially hazardous on-site circulation patterns. ~9'~5 n9o _ ~ FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS: The handling "capacity" of a site is best analyzed using the peak traffic conditions. If the site can accommodate the peak traffic load conditions, then generally, the site can accommodate the traffic conditions that may exist the remainder of the day. Reviewing typical traffic conditions along Brambleton Avenue reveals that the peak-hour is in the late afternoon, often referred to as the PM peak-hour. Since Brambleton Avenue is the arterial roadway providing all access to the 2.25 acres site, then typically the site's peak-hour would be the same as the Brambleton Avenue peak-hour. Therefore, we will evaluate the site conditions during the PM peak-hour of traffic. The trip-ends generated by the site have been produced using the Trip Generation Manual of the Institute of Transportation Engineers. In the afternoon peak-hour, the site would generate the following number of trip-ends. Use P.M. Trip-Ends 1. Office 22 2. Retail 127 3. Drive-Through 30 TOTAL 179 Typically, these 179 trip-ends are not "new" trips as far as Brambleton Avenue is concerned. The majority of these trip-ends are simply "diversions" for existing traffic already using Brambleton Avenue. These are not new trips generated from some far away location. The 179 trip-ends are generated by the site over the peak- hour (60 minutes). That equates to about three (3) trip-ends per minute. The split for the trip-ends would be about 50/50 for the uses on the entire 2.25 acre site. That equates to 1.5 vehicles entering the site and an additional 1.5 vehicles leaving the site every minute during the peak traffic flow hour. The two ingress/egress locations will spread the trip-ends more than 200 feet apart and, therefore, ease the transition of vehicles to and from the site off Brambleton Avenue. ~~ /oq~-~ This traffic flow of three (3) trip-ends per minute obviously will not overload the site during the afternoon peak period, or any other time of the day. The proposed terraced site con- figuration allows for two-way traffic flow adjacent to four of the buildings on the site. This two-way traffic flow would accommodate the upper floor of the building being reconstructed on the site and would allow essential cross-site access between the north and south sides of the site. As we have reviewed above, the total number of vehicles entering and exiting the site, even during the peak-hour, is not too great to cause strained or hazardous traffic flows to exist either on the site or at either entrance/exit area. As shown above, the drive-through area will need to accommo- date 30 trip-ends during the afternoon peak-hour. That means approximately 15 vehicles will drive to the drive-through and 15 vehicles will drive away from the drive-through during the hour. Two drive-throughs are being planned for use. When both drive- throughs are open, the County requirement is to provide 10 stack- ing spaces. Ten stacking spaces at 20 feet per automobile is 100 feet of stacking room for each of the two windows. There is 120 feet of room south of the two windows being provided for this requirement. Obviously, this is enough stacking space when both windows are in operation. The County requirements also request eight (8) stacking places if only one drive-through window is open. As stated earlier, 120 feet of straight stacking exists from the drive- through bay to the south entrance area. In the unlikely event that additional stacking is required, additional space is availa- ble in the two-way drive area on the second terrace of the site. ~s ~ ~ '+~ "° SUMMARY: The June, 1988, rezoning of the Brambleton Commons Project site would produce approximately 149 trip-ends during the after- noon peak-hour. The currently proposed modification to that rezoning of adding a drive-through facility to the site would increase the peak-hour travel by only 30 trip-ends. The new 179 trip-end number during the highest volume travel hour would equate to 1.5 vehicles entering the site and 1.5 vehicles leaving the site every minute. These volumes are simply not large enough to cause either ingress/egress problems at the two entrances or on-site traffic flow problems. - Additionally, the drive-through facility has 120 feet of straight stacking area south of the proposed drive-through windows. This is adequate storage to provide straight stacking for 12 vehicles when both drive-through windows are open for business. If additional stacking should ever be needed, the sec- ond terrace two-way driving area will more than adequately accom- modate the need. /~~~-- ~ VIRGINIA; BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY A 2.25 acre parcel of land, generally located on the northerly side of Brambleton Avenue, SW, (U.S. Route 221) within the Windsor Hills Magisterial District, and recorded as Parcel #86.08-04- 07 and 08 in the Roanoke County Tax Records (the "Property"). AMENDED PROFFER OF CnNDTTInNS TO THE HONORABLE SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY: In accordance with Section 15.1-491.1 et seq. of the Code of Virginia and Section 21-105E of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance, the Petitioner, Springwood Associates, a Virginia General Partnership, hereby voluntarily proffers to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, the following con- ditions to the rezoning of the Property: 1. The conditions previously proffered shall remain in full force and effect with the exception of the addi- tional proffers hereinafter set forth. 2. The Property will be developed in accordance with the Concept Plan made by Balzer and Associates, dated May 3, 1988, and Amendment thereto dated February 21, 1990, except for such changes as may be required by the site plan review. 3. There will be no restaurants on the Property using a drive-through facility. 4. There will be no "fast food restaurants" on the Property. "Fast Food restaurants" shall be defined as McDonalds, Hardees, Burger Ring and Wendys. 5. There will be no restaurant of any kind in Building "D" on the Property. uw oFF~cEs W ROOERS i _°OROVE RuMnOKE, VA. ~~~` _ _ l ~ `~.`' 6. There will be no convenience market on the Property. Respectfully submitted, SPRINGWOOD ASSOCIATES By: G~ ~• Mic ae R. Sme tzer Attorney for Petitioner uw oFFtcEs woo• 'XiERS i M. LOVE ROA.. _c, VA. -2- i ~.. ATTACSMENT A <k .•~ ••~~ ~~, M• w . w ~'" ~~+'~~ 1' 00 ._tl~~ /~ i ~~ ;~ ~ t r. a j~~i ~~~~. ti;~ N N ~i ~~~ ;~~ ~~ ~~ ,. : . 1','N/S~b'/~I q7 331ONOt'~/ fY1/7id 1d~i.7V1K.t7 ~ ~ SMOl~/lvt~J .~H1 ~ ~ ! ~ ~~ ~~ r Q~ 4~ ---, "abos.~p ~ ~e 1 _ ~ ~ rorw`N; "~ti n ~ 2~ ~~ ~M ~ ~M ~ 1 i ~O 1 ~ ~ t 0 R i ~ w ~~ t ~~~~ C M J` y ~~ ~~ I 1 J t Y` s Y~:~ v C~iM °v ~~` Vi //i ~ ~ 6' ~ ATTACHMENT B ~ ~ ~!~ ;.., ?~O~~N 1t'~ ~ } ; •~~ • ~~_- a 4 ~o~ i ~ _ ~ '' ' I< -~~ a ~t~~f~ • i~s~~~ ~ o `s ,t,~e~ 1f W ~~ I~~ ~ I~ :+• ~ ':- ~, '-s ,, , W ~ ~ Ili c ~'•~'~+ I I I I ai• `''~ ' Z yt • ' ~~a! W I ~~ ro,g.~in, V ~ I 1 I ~` ` 'Y ti. ~,~~~~ j p p- `` )'~_-``~~ ~y 1 ~ ~ ~ I Zn 2 ~ ~ - R -~ ~ ~ W ~- ~ , ,, t- -,~ ~'i ~, 1 ~ ~ --~'' ' 1 ~ ~ I ~ __ ~ ~ ', _ ~ { I _.~ ~ ~ :~ 1 ~~~ ~-a --ice $ I ~I ~ I ~, ~j• I O ~ ~^ ! ~~ ~ I r 1 -1- W 1~ m ~ ~ I 1 0 ~ ~ ~ 1" 1 ~ a I c 1 W IL ~ ~ N` R '~ y I ' 1 _ 2 t _ I I a i a -~` ~ ~~ _; , ot0 ~~'u ~' _ S I ~~~ ~ t O ~ ~ 1 Cr I M~ ~~ Yy 1 1 t~ ~ ~ • Z ' 1 = 8 - - _ -1t p~ ~' I w ~~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ 1 ~ x Y s~ a -- r ~ ~~ / L ~' .2/SN! --N.Dih SO./IN I I ~~ i I r ryM'~1 ,.p nuot ~ 2.p~swt 1WM~/M~~(/JIVIY ~yn0~ nC-4Mir I ~cl~- (y HL' pC i rao~ • /0) , r90)0 ~ [0) OJ our ~Yr~^ ~ ~, i ~» W i ., ,' ``'~ -,, ~;,a,, b +.(.µ .~ ~'~~ i r 'SS~~ ~~a 4 r ~~ ~~~,,,}}}... S~' ~ E ]? f'. . -' /i /'4 ~C6 ~'C L+~# . ~, ~.,,,,1 :; irnr. t~ i ~ 2 i~ ~1 R• ~ ~. Er' ~~ i 1 ,~~ • (~ •alrr. . 9, `r. i~~~'r(,}~~,~ rict`wJocu _ L,~_ ~ V~~ (0 C i^ Y ~~pRrwOLa=ILUi_..~W. __~ -_- -- ~, - - 1""'~'sK .~ ~ 'F ~1 ~-7'~MKf9 M~1i~t D4 . r G 9' ~ ~l '`y~ ~g ,y~, $ ~"r'"70 sv4~cr v ~ V_ ~'g~q+s~~ I~ ,~s~~. . 1 ~ ~ $ - NORTR y Y `~ .~ ~ a :; ~~ ~ i °~ -~ . a''y. ~', ~? ~ A a / - ..r oa ~~ / ~~o ~ ~1r ?v / ~ / ' C ~ ~~ ~c / ,f ~ / rt .~! ~ / , B~ / / t j 1 ? e c 1 • v C / ~ O R1 L , i r ~,;;+ s / / B1 B1 A1C R5C / ~ / / / ..,.~ ,~ , . / ~ .~ ~-~ Colon~ol~Aw QA v !. z al ee ~+ a / / 8 ,,. _+ ~ ~ ~ ~~ 1 f " ~ / I / g2 cav n~.o~ c. , 2? 1 ~ / B • , 9 / ~ v 2 t 79 K K , p ~~' M ~ O s ~ c,.~. cu',ti w of coN •' t nc jq p~J B2 ~~ ~` 1• ~ / ''~., ° / / g' ~ ~,. / R~ ~ / ,• BZ ~ / / / N,•r 11 / '~~ / J / 19 ,. , ,. 11 , / 18 6 / ~1, O ' a » 2 s j ~ 261.( R5C / an a 1• ,s o 12 • _ ~ 11 1 - I it / r 10 • ~~ B~ c ` T , • 2 x~ / R „~ ~ to ~c ~1 _ M / / b .r1 t, ,,, / 1T w r, BA / ~ ~ r ti ~ ,~ 5 / ~. ~ ~ ` r 1~ D J.~ Ms L •, / b (, p ~ ,J N / R~ ~ ,p ~ s1 ~~ ` ~o - ~ 9 T 6 b , - w/1 ; ` ~~t ~c •~ r~ ~ ~ - ~ -` COMMUNITY PM~NT RS AND DBYBLO I~N~1~ ~, 12 1 26 ASS~~A'~c'ES Swµ6NO~U ~ IE~ t3-ZC To Nto~ F ~ g-2C ~,OS-~`, -p1 L i~~a - ~, AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, OCTOBER 23, 1990 ORDINANCE TO AMEND PROFFERED CONDITIONS ON THE REZONING OF A 2.25 ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED AT 4515 BRAMBLETON AVENUE IN THE WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF B-2, CONDITIONAL, TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF B-2, CONDITIONAL (AMENDMENT TO PROFFERS) UPON THE APPLICATION OF SPRINGWOOD ASSOCIATES WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on April 24, 1990, and the second reading and public hearing was held September 25, 1990; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on September 4, 1990; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law; and WHEREAS, this property was rezoned from R-l, Residential District, and B-1, Office District, to B-2, Business District with proffered conditions, on June 28, 1988. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing approximately 2.25 acres, as described herein, and located at 4515 Brambleton Avenue in the Windsor Hills Magiste- rial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of B-2, Conditional, to the zoning classification of B-2, Conditional with amended proffered conditions. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of Springwood Associates. ~ a ~7~ -~ icant has voluntarily proffered in writing 3• That the apps roved by the slowing amendments to proffered conditions app the fo which the Board of Super- Board of Supervisors on June 28, 1988, visors hereby accepts: s reviously proffere orihof the aadditional a) The condition P excepts forceers hereinafter sethforth. prof f will be developed associates dat d Mayt3e b) The property Balzer and A 21, 1990, concept plan made by fired by the site 1988, and amendment ese ast mayabedrequ roar except for such Chang plan review. ro erty using a restaurants on the p P c) There will be no drive-thru facility- on the p P be no "fast food restaurdefined as McDonalds, d) There wall shall be "Fast food reer Kingtsand Wendys• Hardees, Burg ' 1 be no restaurant of any kind in Building D on e) There wsl the property. ro erty• here will be no convenience market on the p P f) T described as follows: 4 , That said real estate is more fully erl side BEGINNING at a point on the northweso nt ybeing hway Route 221, said p of U•S• Hag in and being corner to the marked by an iron H g (DB 1181, page 1641): property of H.J. an Route 221, and with 32e 35"e W• thence leaving N, 39 deg- to an property, corner the the Ha Beet to an iron pin, DB 1228, Page 91.45 Developers ( Valley property of ValWi~h the line of the W• 1667); thence N• 41 deg, 05 40" Developers' property, thence continuing 167.12 feet to an iron Developers, N. 41 deg. with the line of Valley Dint marked by ~n 27' 20" E. 369.7 feet to a p ro erty of F• iron rebar, corner to the p ape 690); thence Finney Const. Co. (DB 1138, p gDevelopers and leaving the property of Valley Const. Co. with the line of the F. W• Finney three courses and property, the followi2 ~ 25~~ E• 195,57 feet distances: S' S thence S. 12 deg. 39' 05" W• to an iron Pinan iron pin; and thence S. 11 39.9 feet to feet to an iron pin, deg. 40' 10~~ E• 63.65 ~~~~~ located on the northwestieft oint being with a curve to the said p feet, a chord side of Route 221of 1-g84'g6 arc having a radius 43. 10" W'' thence bearing of S• 50 deg' iron pin; of 258.17 feet to an35~ 50,E E, 47.47 distance g, 27 deg• with with Rou an 2iron pin; thence continuing feet to ~ 25" W. 93.88 feet of g, 49 deg. 57 the place Route 221- an iron pin, a point marked by BEGINNING; and shown on plat articularly dated March 2.25 acres as more p Inc., Containengmade by Balzer & Associates, of sure Y 86,08-4-7. 3, 1986; Tax Map No• effect ordinance shall be in full force and 5, That this arts er its final passage• All ordinances or p thirty (30) days aft 'ct with the provisions of this ordinance e- of ordinances in confll and the same hereby are, repealed. 1UIIIIIIII~IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIllJ - - - - - - - - - - - - APPEARANCE RE UEST _ Q _ - - - - _ _ - - - - AGENDA ITEM NO. ~'~~ ~jc - ~ - - __ SUBJECT S`'~~: ~ rtj , ;~ ~,,.:s ~ ~ ~- ~ C~:s.~-~~s __ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so that I may comment.WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES __ LISTED BELOW. • Each speaker will be given between three to #ive minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the -Boazd- to c do otherwise. c • Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Ques- bons of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. • All comments must be directed to the Boazd. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all tunes. • Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments c with the clerk. • INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION c FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO DEPUTY CLERK _ - mlllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllillllllllllllillillllllllllllllllllllilllllllllllllllllllilllillillllllllllillllillllllm ~IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIInIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIiIIIIIIIIIIIIIiIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIjJ,I _ _ _ _ APPEARANCE RE VEST _ Q - _ - _ - _ - __ AGENDA ITEM NO. ` Cr ~' ~ __ -_ _ ? ~ ' ~': W ~a ~. ,S ~ t~c2~ ; ire, c~ - _ SUBJECT ~ ~ `~' "' -_ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so that I may comment.WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES __ - = LISTED BELOW. • Baker will be iven between three to five minutes to comment Each sp g whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. -_ • S Bakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Ques- P bons of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. c c • All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized __ speaker and audience members is not allowed. • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. c • Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments -_ with the clerk. _i • INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. c __ ~_ PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO DEPUTY CLERK milllllllllllllllllllllilllillllllllllllll 11 l I Iillllllllllllllllllllllillllilllillllllillllllllllllllllllllllllilllllillllllillllm _ _ APPEARANCE RE VEST _ Q - _ _ _ __ _ _ c AGENDA ITEM NO. ~~ ~ `'~ __ SUBJECT~~s g2Q~ ~~~ ~ ~Gw~~~ ,~} z _ -_ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so that I may comment.WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW. __ • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment =_ whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to __ do otherwise. • Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Ques- tions of clarification may be entertained by the Chauman. • All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. • Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments __ with the clerk. • INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. __ PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO DEPUTY CLERK c _ _ m~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~m ~IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII~IIIIIII.IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIiIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII1,11J - - - - _ _ APPEARANCE RE UEST Q - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ AGENDA ITEM NO. ~ ~'~=~-~ __ SUBJECT ~ ~~~;~~f~~~",-~-~~-1 ~- ~:~.~ ~..~- ~-~~ ,-~z.~~~r~~~- ~~ . I would like the Chairman of~the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so that I may comment.WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW. __ _ • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to -_ do otherwise. -_ • Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Ques- bons of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. • All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. • Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments =_ with the clerk. c • INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM 'THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. __ _ PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO DEPUTY CLERK ~; - - _ - mlillilllllilillllllllllililllllllllllllllllillllllllllllllllllllllllllillilllilllllllllllllillllillllllilillllllllilllllllllllll~ ,, AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, OCTOBER 23, 1990 ORDINANCE 102390-14 VACATING A PORTION OF A TWENTY (20) FOOT SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT UPON REQUEST OF EDINBURGH SQUARE FOUNDATION, HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, Edinburgh Square Foundation, the developer of an adult-care facility known as Edinburgh Greens, has requested the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia to vacate a portion of a twenty (20) foot sanitary sewer easement, dedicated to the County by deed found in Deed Book 562, page 405 in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia; and, WHEREAS, Section 15.1-482 (b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, requires that such action be accomplished by the adoption of an ordinance by the governing body; and, WHEREAS, notice has been given as required by Section 15.1- 431 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and a first reading of this ordinance was held on October 9, 1990; and the public hearing and second reading of this ordinance was held on October 23, 1990. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That a portion of a twenty (20) foot sanitary sewer easement located adjacent to an existing five-story adult-care facility known as Edinburgh Greens as shown on plat prepared by Lumsden Associates, P.C., dated 8 August 1990, entitled "Portion of 20' Sanitary Sewer Easement," said easement dedicated to Roanoke County by deed found in Deed Book 562, at page 405 in the afore- said Clerk's Office, be, and hereby ~is, vacated pursuant to Section 15.1-482 (b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended; and, 2. That as a condition of the adoption of this ordinance, Edinburgh Square Foundation hereby agrees to pay all costs and expenses required to vacate and relocate this easement and the sanitary sewer line therein; and, 3. That as a condition of the adoption of this ordinance, Edinburgh Square Foundation hereby agrees to dedicate to the County a new twenty (20) foot sanitary sewer easement to replace the easement described above, and to dedicate to the County a drainage easement, all as described on the plat described above. 4. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. 5. That Edinburgh Square Foundation shall record a certified copy of this ordinance with the Clerk of the Circuit Court and shall pay all fees required to accomplish this transaction. On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Development & Inspections Terry Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning ACTION # ITEM NUMBER ~ Q ~ ~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: October 23, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: Second reading and Public Hearing of the Ordinance requesting to vacate approximately 250 feet of an existing 20 foot wide sanitary sewer Easement, shown on construction plans for Edinburgh Green addition site plans and recorded in Deed Book 562, Page 405, refer to attached Plat. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The petitioners, Edinburgh Square Foundation, are requesting the Board of Supervisors to vacate approximately 250 feet of an existing 20 foot wide sanitary sewer Easement, by Ordinance, so that the Easement can be relocated. BACRGROUND Edinburgh Green Foundation is in the process of adding a 40 room addition to their existing elderly retirement apartment complex, Edinburgh Square. This proposed addition will be located over the existing sanitary sewer line and Easement thus creating the need for the relocation. Roanoke County staff have approved a construction plan which details the relocation of the sanitary sewer line and the petitioner has prepared the necessary documents required for the relocation. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION The County Staff is requesting that the described Easement be vacated in accordance with Chapter 11, Title 15.1-482(b), Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, by adoption of the attached Ordinance. The First Reading of the proposed Ordinance was held on /~ ~-- October 9, 1990; Public Hearing and Second Reading is scheduled for October 23, 1990. STAFF RECOMMENDATION The County staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors adopt the proposed Ordinance to vacate the referenced sanitary sewer Easement and instruct the County Attorney in preparation of the Ordinance, that the 20 foot sanitary sewer Easement be vacated upon the recordation of the Deed and Plat providing a new 20 foot sanitary sewer Easement dedicated to the County of Roanoke. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: l ~~ ~ ~ Arnold Covey Elmer C. Hodge Development and Ins ections County Administrator Director --------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Eddy Received ( ) Johnson Referred McGraw To Nickens Robers ["~ ~' ; ., TAX #38.12-4-10 NOW OR FORMERLY PROPERTY OF DALLAS G. JARRELL JOYCE H. JARRELL D.B. 1201, PG. 445 20' PSj~~PE~EWER t UNE DIRECTION DISTANCE 1-2 N 29'05'37" E 80.44' 2-3 N 60'54 23 W 10.00 3-4 N 29'05 37 E 15.00 4-5 S 60'54 23 E 10.00 5-6 N 29'05 37 E 64.81 6-7 N 41'03'35' W 94.09 7-8 8. 8-9 S 41'03 35 E 127.84 9-10 S 29'05 37 W 215.99 10-1 S 03'28 04 W 46.24 AREA ~ B 131 S.F. TAX ~~tt38.16-1-1 NOW O.i~ FORMERLY PROPERTY OF FIRST MORTGAGE CORP. ET AL D.B. 1154, PG. 7321 TAX` 33.m ,.,~~~:~~ NOW 1 R~RMERLY PROPERTY OF HERITAGE INVESTMENTS &TOWNSIDE CONSTRUCTION CO., IJJC. •D.B. 1199 PG. 55 I I 124.24' S89'46'S2"E 341.5 ~~9~ EXISTING N613ti~~ 20' SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT J.B. 562, PG. 405: PROPOSED 15' DRAINAGE 20' SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT TO BE VACATE~'y PROPOSED 20' SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT . TAX #p38.16-1-1.1 ED NBURG SQUARE C FOUNDATION 10~ " A VIRGINIA CORPORATION . •Og'2~, W D.B. 1226, PG. 1508. 57866.66 o ~ 1 w 0 fz ~ EXISTING n 20' SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT ''~ ~ PROPOSED NEW 15' DRAINAGE EASEMENT UNE DIRECTION DISTANCE A-8 N 31'41 40 E 100.40 B- N 05'30 02 W 251.73 D-E N 17'38'52' W 291.76' E-F S 89'46 52 E 15.76 F-G S 17'38 52 E 289.97 G- 1 1 4.4 H-I S 05'30 02 E 256.07 I-J S 31'41 40 W 78.45 J-A S 60'4157 W 30.89 AREA = 10 322 S.F. D.B. 562, PG. 405 1 ` ,.A" o = 11 •so'1 s" R = 1233.24' 1 1 T =- 127.85' L = 254.79' CHORD = 566'39'12" 254 35' N O N N N ~~ pp (T1 0 a 0 z ~ o iio 0 o < 1 F y ~ ~ ~ SITE z a ~3 1 a IOCA NO iC'-+ N n d ~ o+ ~ U? ~ o ~~ 0 ~ J OD W w ~'- 0 0 ca ~~ m ~~y~ ~~ X06 O 0 u-> I U m ~~ Z I Q p J ~ O ~ I '~ N S ~ 0 o~ ~ U w W Op z~ Qa ow ~~ w~ ~~ O}~$Sy'Cn op y f~c O "A" B. LEE ~ g~ ~ HENDERSON, JR. ~ ~` Nc. ,480 .R S~~ g R1w ~.~„a X04 ~,~ PLAT SHOWING PROPOSED NE1P 20' SANITARY SEIPER EASEMENT ricOPv^^.:, y ilElP .~' DFAINAGE EASLb:E."?°' BEING DEDICATED TO THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE FOR PUBLIC USE PROPERTY OF EDINBURGH SQUARE FOUNDATION A VIRGINIA CORPORATION LOCATED IN HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT ROANOBE COUNTY, VIItGINIA SCALE: 1" = 100' DATE: 18 SEPTEMBER 1990 LUMSDEN ASSOCIATES, P.C. ENGINEERS -SURVEYORS -PLANNERS ROANOKE, VIRGINIA COMM. y90-004 1v~~-'7 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT TUESDAAYN,OOCTOBERT23ADM990STRATION CENTER ON ORDINANCESEWER EASEM NT UPON OREQUEST OF EDINBURGH )SQUARE SANITARY FOUNDATION, HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, Edinburgh Square Foundation, the developer of an adult-care facility known as Edinburgh Greens, has requested the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia to vacate a portion of a twenty (20) foot sanitary sewer easement, dedicated to the County by deed found in Deed Book 562, page 405 in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia; and, WHEREAS, Section 15.1-482 (b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, requires that such action be accomplished by the adoption of an ordinance by the governing body; and, WHEREAS, notice has been given as required by Section 15.1- 431 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and a first reading of this ordinance was held on October 9, 1990; and the public hearing and second reading of this ordinance was held on October 23, 1990. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That a portion of a twenty (20) foot sanitary sewer easement located adjacent to an existing five-story adult-care facility known as Edinburgh Greens as shown on plat prepared by Lumsden Associates, P.C., dated 8 August 1990, entitled "Portion of 20' Sanitary Sewer Easement," said easement dedicated to Roanoke County by deed found in Deed Book 562, at page 405 in the afore- ~.~ said Clerk's Office, be, and hereby is, vacated pursuant to Section 15.1-482(b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended; and, 2. That as a condition of the adoption of this ordinance, Edinburgh Square Foundation hereby agrees to pay all costs and expenses required to vacate and relocate this easement and the sanitary sewer line therein; and, 3. That as a condition of the adoption of this ordinance, Edinburgh Square Foundation hereby agrees to dedicate to the County a new twenty (20) foot sanitary sewer easement to replace the easement described above, and to dedicate to the County a drainage easement, all as described on the plat described above. 4. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. 5. That Edinburgh Square Foundation shall record a certified copy of this ordinance with the Clerk of the Circuit Court and shall pay all fees required to accomplish this transaction. ~lI~~MENIG CITY o~ aoaNO,~~ '' I ~ I a, w p ,r (~ N rt Z " ~i~ ~i `ice ~,~ 1979 ~~ ~~ ~ ~ a ~~~ 1989 8 E50 $a SFSpU1CENTENN~P~ A Bcautirul8eginning BOARD OF SUPERVISORS RICHARD W. ROBERS. CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT STEVEN A. AMT WBA MAGISTERIALHDISTRIC'T COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR LEE B. EDDY ELMER C. HODGE WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT October 25, 1990 The Honorable L. Douglas Wilder Governor, Commonwealth of Virginia 910 Capitol Street Richmond, VA 23219 Dear Governor Wilder: Attached is a copy of Resolution No. 102390-2 expressing support for the involvement of Virginia Tech in the Hotel Roanoke/Conferensors atttheir meeting onlTuesday, Oct bere23 b 1990e Board of Supervi If you need further information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, ~~ ~'`~ ~. Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors bjh Attachment pc: The Honorable Noel C. Taylor, Mayor, City of Roanoke W. Robert Herbert, Roanoke City Manager Dr. James D. McComas, President, Virginia Tech Raymond Smoot, Virginia Tech Real Estate Foundation, Inc. Roanoke Valley Legislators P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24018-0798 (703) 772-2004 All -AMERICA GT'/ o~ aoarvo~.F 1' I I •w ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~~ 1979 ~ ? ~ ~ 89 ~ a ~i~~~~ ~ 19 a E5 as SFSQUICENTENN~P~ ' BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ~ BeautifuBeginninR RICHARD W• ROBERS. CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT STEVEN A• CMATnwBA MAG ILSTERICAL DISTRICT COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR LEE B. EDDY ELMER C. HODGE WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT October 25, 1990 The Honorable L. Douglas Wilder Governor, Commonwealth of Virginia 910 Capitol Street Richmond, VA 23219 Dear Governor Wilder: of Resolution No. 102390-2 expressing support Attached is a copy Virginia Tech in the Hotel for the involvement of the Roanoke/Conference Centtheir meeting on Tuesday, Oct bere23b 1990. Board of Supervisors at If you need further information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors bjh Attachment pc; The Honorable Noel C. Taylor, Mayor, City of Roanoke W. Robert Herbert, Roanoke City Manager Dr. James D. McComas, President, Virginia Tech Raymond Smoot, Virginia Tech Real Estate Foundation, Inc. Roanoke Valley Legislators P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24018-0796 (703> 772-2004 O~ PpANpK~ ~ ~ ; Z _~ J a 18 (150 $a SFSQUICENTENN\P 1 13t.+uli~ul Btl;inrnn,K COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE All AMERICA CITY ~, '~~ f ~1 (t ~~~ ~~ 1979 ~~" 1989 ~~~x~~ ~ October 25, 1990 Mr. Gordon C. Willis, Sr., Chairman The University Connection 1010 Dominion Bank Building Roanoke, VA 24011 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS RICHARD W~ ROBERS. CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT STEVEN A. CMA gWBA MAGISTERICAL DISTRICT LEE B. EDDY WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT Dear Mr. Willis: of Resolution No. 102390-8.d expressing support Attached is a copy for the direct highway link adowted by t ea Board of Supervisorsnat Tech. This resolution was P 1990• their meeting on Tuesday, October 23, If you need further information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, ~Q~~" ~- Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors bjh Attachment VDOT pc• Fred Altizer, Jr., Resident Engineer, • John Milliken, Secretary, VDOT Steve Musselwhite, Executive Committee, University Connection P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24018-0798 • (703) 772-2004 of aoaMp~.F ~ w p z Z o ~ J 18 ;'so 88 ~ SFSOUICENTENN~P f Ii.~uui~ulR~~,_:rnnn~ COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C HODGE AILAMERICA LITY ~/ ''I I~' ~~~ ~~ 1979 1989 C~~~~t~t~~ ~ October 23, 1990 Mr. Edward G. Kohinke, Sr. 6913 Bradshaw Road Salem, VA 24153 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS RICHARD W ROBERS. CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT STEVEN A. AMT WBA MAGI TER AL{D15TRICT LEE B. EDDY WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT Dear Mr. Kohinke: This is to advise that at their meeting held on Tuesday, October the Board of Supervisors voted unanimously to appoint 23, 1990, you as a member of the Expi t e Advisory Committee representing t e Catawba Magisterial Dist State law provides that any person elected, re-elected, appointed, ointed to any body be furnished a copy of the Freedom of or re-app Information Act; your copy is enclosed. We are also sending you a copy of the Conflicts of Interest Act. Both of 1989e acts were amended by the Virginia General Assembly in July, On behalf of the Superv cere thankse and 1 appreciationok forouyour please accept our sin ointment. willingness to accept this app Very truly yours, Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors bjh Enclosures P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24018-0798 (703) 772-2004 o~ aoarvp~.F ~ ~ 1_ p 2 G? Z v a 1$ 1150 $8 sFSQUICENTENN~P~ (irauti~ul8cr;lnnln~ COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE Mr. Buford T. Lumsden 3423 Farmington Circle Roanoke, VA 24018 Dear Mr. Lumsden: October 23, 1990 BOARD r /t 'It ll'1 trVl'.1 Ilr' 1 Ilnlnrenll RICNARf1W flrtllll/''IrlPi I„Inn I rJ.1/f 'd ~r.lrn LI n•,r r I.new 1 IInulMnlr STEVEN A M Jlr I r,' 1. N11• M~"~~ I I IrIAI I ~I rl l Ills 1 V I I I I l d IV WINIW ~ 1111 I " M.~ rl~'r r 111 ~1 I ~1= I Illy I I1•,n I II 11Irr.I,N 1« A I d1', MM J•, I I IIAN II( hl INS I IAnl/ J1111r HI Mir rl': 11 I/IAI I n'.I 111(;i This is to advise that at their meeting held on Tuesday, Octoobn~ 23, 1990, the Board of Supervisors voted unanimously to app you as a member of the Explore Advisory Committee representing the Windsor Hills Magisterial District. State law provides that any person elected, re-elected, appointed, or re-appointed to any body be furnished a copy of the Freedom of Information Act; your copy is enclosed. We are also sending you a copy of the Conflicts of Interest Act. Both of these acts were amended by the Virginia General Assembly in July, 1989. On behalf of the Supervisors and the citizens of Roanoke County, please accept our sincere thanks and appreciation for your willingness to accept this appointment. Very truly yours, bjh Enclosures .II ~Ml nll X1111 (~ rt ~ ~~ ~i~~1t11I;~ ,u,u V~L~ ~~ I,~nu rn~~ ~. Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24018-0798 (703) 772-2004 O~ POANp~~ ti ~ ~ 9 Z ~ 2 J a ~ a ,,, 5o sa SFSOUICENTENN`P 1 8i.urtr~ulHi~;nrnn{ COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE October 25, 1990 The Honorable J. Granger Macfarlane Virginia Senate P. O. Box 201 Roanoke, VA 24002 Dear Senator Macfarlane: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS RICHARD W. ROBERS. CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT STEVEN A. ~M AW6A MAGISTER AL{DISTRICf LEE B. EDDY WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT of Resolution No. 102390-10 supporting the Attached is a copy designation of property of Roanoke Rebos, Inc. as exempt from taxation by the Board aofASup rvlisors at their meeting sonuTuesdays adopted by the October 23, 1990. If you need further information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors bj h Attachment pc: John Turner, Roanoke Rebos, Inc. All AMERICA CITY rr 1' I I'' ~~~ ~~~~ ~,~ 1979 ~~~ ~~ 1989 C~~~t P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24018-0798 (703) 772-2004 O~ POANp~.F ,' ~ ~ 9 Z ~ Z o a J ~$ ~,so~ as SFSOUICENTENN~P ,1 Bt.tun~u!(3i Bunn n4 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE October 25, 1990 The Honorable Dudley J. Emick, Jr. Virginia Senate P. O. Box 158 Fincastle, VA 24090 Dear Senator Emick: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS RICHARD W ROBERS. CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT STEVEN A. MCGRAW. VICE-CHAIRMAN CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT LEE B. EDDY WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT Attached is a copy of Resolution No. 102390-10 supporting the designation of property of Roanoke Rebos, Inc. as exempt from taxation by the General Assembly of Virginia. This resolution was adopted by the Board of Supervisors at their meeting on Tuesday, October 23, 1990. If you need further information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, ->n~-~d-a-~~ Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors bjh Attachment pc: John Turner, All ~MENIC~ CITY ~• 1' I ~ ~ 1 ~t~~tYT~~~ 1979 rt~~~~~~ ~~ 1989 i, Roanoke Rebos, Inc. P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24018-0798 (703> 772-2004 O~` ROANp~F ti ~ p Z ,~j a 18 ~~so 88 SES~UICENTENN~P 1 li rmrt+~u 18 r4 i n rri rtR COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE October 25, 1990 The Honorable A. Victor Thomas Virginia House of Delegates 1301 Orange Avenue, N.E. Roanoke, VA 24012 Dear Delegate Thomas: All AMERICA CITY 'II I'~ 1979 1989 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS RICHARD W. ROBERS. CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT STEVEN A. MCGRAW. VICE•CHAIRMAN CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT LEE B. EDDY WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT Attached is a copy of Resolution No. 102390-10 supporting the designation of property of Roanoke Rebos, Inc. as exempt from taxation by the General Assembly of Virginia. This resolution was adopted by the Board of Supervisors at their meeting on Tuesday, October 23, 1990. If you need further information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors bjh Attachment pc: John Turner, Roanoke Rebos, Inc. (~nltn~~ U~ ~II~tnn~P P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 2 4018-07 9 8 (703) 772-2004 O~ POANp~~ ti .A ` 9 ~ 2 ~ a 1$ (150 8a SFSQUICENTENN~P~ 1 l3tauu~ul ~ct;+rvan~ COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE October 25, 1990 The Honorable Clifton Woodrum Virginia House of Delegates P. O. Box 1371 Roanoke, VA 24007 Dear Delegate Woodrum: ~~ All AMERICA CITY 1'I ~~~ 1979 1989 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS RICHARD W. ROBERS. CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT STEVEN A. MCGRAW. VICE-CHAIRMAN CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT LEE B. EDDY WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT Attached is a copy of Resolution No. 102390-10 supporting the designation of property of Roanoke Rebos, Inc. as exempt from taxation by the General Assembly of Virginia. This resolution was adopted by the Board of Supervisors at their meeting on Tuesday, October 23, 1990. If you need further information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, ~- Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors bjh Attachment pc: John Turner, Roanoke Rebos, Inc. C~nitnt~ of ~nttunkr P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24018-0798 (703) 772-2004 O~ p,pANp~F t` w C 'p Z z ~ a 18 ~ 150` $$ SFSOUICENTENN~P 1 I3c.urrr~ul Rc~rnnrn4 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE October 25, 1990 The Honorable G. Steven Agee Virginia House of Delegates P. O. Box 20068 Roanoke, VA 24018 Dear Delegate Agee: All AMERICA CITY '' I ~' 1979 1989 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS RICHARD W. ROBERS. CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT STEVEN A. MCGRAW. VICE-CHAIRMAN CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT LEE B. EDDY WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT Attached is a copy of Resolution No. 102390-10 supporting the designation of property of Roanoke Rebos, Inc. as exempt from taxation by the General Assembly of Virginia. This resolution was adopted by the Board of Supervisors at their meeting on Tuesday, October 23, 1990. If you need further information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, ~- Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors bjh Attachment pc: John Turner, Roanoke Rebos, Inc. C~n~tnt~ of ~uttnukr P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24018-0798 (703) 772-2004 o~ aonnio~.~ ti '~ ` 9 z ~ ~ 2 v a 18 ('SOS 88 ' SFSOUICENTENN~P~ 1 8~.u+u~ul8r~; rurrrt{ COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE Oct„l~~,r 25, 1990 The Honorable C. Richard Cr+~l)WCIl Virginia House of Delegates P. O. Box 459 Vinton, VA 24179 Dear Delegate Cranwell: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS RICHARD W. ROBERS. CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT STEVEN A. MCGRAW. VICE•CHAIRMAN CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT LEE B. EDDY WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL. DISTRICT Attached is a copy of Resolution No. 102390-10 supporting the designation of property of Roanoke Rebos, Inc. as exempt from taxation by the General AsselllUlY of Virginia. This resolution was adopted by the Board of Supervisors at their meeting on Tuesday, October 23, 1990. If you need further information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Miry H. Allen, Clerk Ro.inoke County Board of Supervisors bjh Attachment Inc. pc: John Turner, Roanoke Rebos, All AMERICA L11Y A~ ' ~ I I'' 1 1 ~~i~ ~1~~~1,~ 1979 (~L11tIt~~~ 1 ,989 1 P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24018-0798 (703) 772-2004 q~ pOANO,y-F ~ ,F 9 Z ~ ~ z J a 1 8 E5 5 , 88 v SFSGUICENTENN~P A BeautifulBcginning COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE October 24, 1990 Rev. D. Michael Meloy Windsor Hills United Methodist Church 3591 Windsor Road, S. W. Roanoke, YA 24018 Dear Reverend Meloy: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS RICHARD W. ROBERS. CHAIRMAN GVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT STEVEN A. (MATAWBA MAGISTERL4LH DISTRICT LEE B. EDDY WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT On behalf of the Board of Supervisors, I would like to take this Tuesda n`Octobert you know of our appreciation for your attending the meeting on y, 23, 1990, to o,~`er the invocation. We feel it is most important to ask God's blessing on these meetings so that all is done according to His will and for the good of all citizens. Thank you for sharing your time with us. Sincerely, RWR/bjh ~IL~MFRICA CITY ~, I~I I~' ~~ ~~,~ ~~ 1979 ~~~ ~~ 1989 ~~~ R. W. Robers, Chairman Roanoke County Board of Supervisors P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24018-0798 (703) 772-2004 M E M O R AND II M TO: Members of he Board of Supervisors `~ FROM: Elmer C. Hod e County Administrator DATE: October 19, 1990 SUBJECT: County Participation in the Hotel Roanoke/Conference Center Project After your September 25 public hearing on the Hotel Roanoke/Conference Center Project, the Supervisors instructed staff to work with Virginia Tech and Roanoke City on possible Roanoke County participation. You directed that a formula be found that would provide the County a portion of the financial benefits, if any. Staff has met with Roanoke City and Virginia Tech, but due to time constraints we have not been able to complete discussions on the issue. I am therefore requesting that action on this project be continued to the December 4, 1990 Board of Supervisors meeting. COMMITTEE VACANCIES IN 1990 JANUARY FEBRUARY MARCH ELECTORAL BOARD - APPOINTED BY COURTS Three year terms of Leonard M. Pick, Secretary, and Armand L. Sanderson, Chairman, will expire 02/28/90. GRIEVANCE PANEL Two year term of Eugene M. Martin will expire 02/23/90. REGIONAL AIRPORT COMMISSION Three year term of Bob L. Johnson will expire 02/10/90. COURT SERVICE IINIT ADVISORY COUNCIL YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES ADVISORY BOARD Two year terms of Gerald Curtiss, Catawba District, Roger Smith, Catawba District, Gary J. Minter, Hollins District, and Sherry Robison, Windsor Hills District, will expire 03/22/90. LEAGUE OF OLDER AMERICANS One year term of Webb Johnson will expire 03/31/90. TRANSPORTATION AND SAFETY COMMISSION Four year terms of Arnold Struson, Medical Representative, and Jackie Talevi, Legal Respresentative District, will expire 03/01/90. APRIL TRANSPORTATION AND SAFETY COMMISSION Four year term of Lt. Delton R. Jessup, State Police Representative, will expire 04/01/90. 1 MAY TAP BOARD OF DIRECTORS Two year terms of Elizabeth W. Stokes, County Appointee, and E. Cabell Brand, Joint Appointee will expire 05/05/90. JUNE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS Five year term of M. E. Maxey, Chairman, Vinton District, will expire 06/30/90. FIFTH PLANNING DISTRICT COMMISSION Three year term of Lee B. Eddy, Elected Representative, serving Bob Johnson's unexpired term will expire 06/30/90. PARRS & RECREATION ADVISORY COMMISSION Three year term of Alice Gillespie, Hollins District, will expire 06/30/90. Three year term of Linda Shiner, Cave Spring District, William J. Skelton, Jr., Windsor Hills District, and Roger Smith, Members at Large will expire 06/30/90. ROANORE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD - APPOINTED BY SCHOOL BOARD SELECTION COMMITTEE Four year term of Charlsie Pafford, Windsor Hills District, will expire 06/30/90. VIRGINIA WESTERN COMMUNITY COLLEGE BOARD Four year term of Monty Plymale will expire 06/30/90. JULY BUILDING CODE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS AND APPEALS Four year terms of Larry Lester, Alternate, and John Brownlee, Alternate, will expire 07/25/90. AUGUST 2 SEPTEMBER GRIEVANCE PANEL Two year terms of Thomas T. Palmer and R. Vincent Reynolds, Atlernate, will expire 09/10/90. INDIISTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Four year terms of J. Carson Quarles, and Daniel A. Zahn, will expire 09/26/90. OCTOBER BUILDING CODE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS AND APPEALS Four year term of Albert Trompeter, will expire 10/24/90. NOVEMBER DECEMBER BUILDING CODE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS AND APPEALS Four year term of Wilmore T. Leffell, Vinton District, will expire 12/12/90. LIBRARY BOARD Four year term of Leesa Dalton will expire 12/31/90. MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES OF THE ROANORE VALLEY COMMUNITY SERVICES BOARD Three year terms of Henry L. Woodward, Member at Large, and Henry J. Sullivan, County Appointee, will expire 12/31/90. ROANORE PLANNING COMMISSION Four year term of A. Kyle Robinson, Vinton District, will expire 12/31/90. 3 . _. s®-~-9~ ROANOKE COUN'T'Y BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA OCTOBER 9 , 1990 Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Meeting. Regular meetings are held on the second Tuesday and the fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public hearings are held at 7:00 p.m on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.) 1. Roll Call 2. Invocation: The Reverend Linda Mitchell Christ Lutheran Church 3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag. B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS C. PROCL~IMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS, AND AWARDS Sc.~pa ~t3d . ~. ~~ - .z.3 1. Resolution of Welcome to visiting teachers from the Youth Japanese Teachers' Program. from Virginia i D. NEW BUSINESS Q~~ 1. Approval of Recommendation to the Airport Commission on future appointments. 2. Request for emergency funds for the Clearbrook Fire & Rescue Station underground fuel storage contamination project. E. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS F. REQUEST FOR WORK SESSIONS G. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance requesting vacation of approximately 250 feet of an existing 20 foot wide sanitary sewer easement shown on construction plans for Edinburgh Green addition. -- n,e ~ 2. Ordinance amending Chapter 9, "Fire Prevention and -~ 1 r~ Protection" of the Roanoke County Code by adding Article III, "Smoke Detectors" H. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES I. APPOINTMENTS 1. Board of Zoning Appeals 2. Building Code Board of Adjustments and Appeals 3. Explore Citizens Advisory Committee 4. Grievance Panel 5. Recycling Advisory Committee J. CONSENT AGENDA ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED 3 SEPARATELY. 1. Approval of Minutes -September 12, 1990 2. Approval of Raffle Permit for the Cave Spring Elementary School PTA 3. Request for acceptance of Viking Drive and Norseman Drive into the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System. 4. Request for acceptance of Chippenham Drive, Shrewsbury Court and Brentwood Court into the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System. 5. Request for acceptance of Fairway Estates Drive into the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System. 6. Request for acceptance of Fairway Estates Drive into the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System. 7. Acceptance of water and sanitary sewer facilities serving North Meadows, Section I. K. CITIZENS' CONIlVIENTS AND COIV~VIUNICATIONS 1. Pat Dalton to speak concerning the "No Left Turn" signs on Grandin Road Extension. 4 L. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS M. REPORTS 1. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance 2. General Fund Unappropriated Balance 3. Board Contingency Fund N. EXECUTIVE SESSION pursuant to the Code of Virginia Section 2.1-344 (a) O. CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE SESSION P. ADJOiJRNMENT 5 GIONAL AIgpORT RVISOR O~SON: REPORTS ED THAT COUNTY ~1VIBERS SUrE SSION. ASKED COM~SSION RETR~T AND pO~TEES TO C011~IlVII gECONIl~~~ED CITIZEN AP E,~G gEGARDIlVG FOR DISCUSSION AT 1o19I NAZI- ~gpORT COr,I~SSION. APPOIlVTMENTS TO REG VEL E ~ WAS R NiCGRAW= REPOR`T'ED ON HIED ADVIS SUPERVTSO POLICE DEPARTMENT MEMBERS OF THE SED ~VTTH TT~~ PROFESSIONALISM• rnipRES s 10/9/90 Please have an appropriate resolution prepared for the October 23, 1990 Board Meeting. Subject is the 75th Anniversary of Roland E. Cook Elementary School. To find out the appropriate histor call Mr. Ron Weaver, at 982-8224. He is the Y, etc., having a special observation of their birthday on Sunday,tOctober 28 and I would like to be able to present a resolution to him at that time. Thank you. Harry C. Nickens cc: Mary Allen Anne Marie Green - Please prepare. Thanks. 10-15-90 12:37 p.m. Mary Allen: Pat Dalton, work 981-2721, called and she would like to be put on agenda for October 23 meeting under citizens comments. No left hand turn signs on Mudlick Road. Said she went to meeting and was told the signs were put up to stop through traffic . When asked what that was, Bill Clark said that was County traffic. She says this is dragging too long, and she wants to speak. Brenda 9-28-90 Mary Allen Pat Dalton called and would like to be put on Agenda under Citizens Comments to talk about "No Left Turns To Grandin Road Extension". She said she had been talking with Lee Eddy about this for about a month and was advised to be put on the agenda with her topic. Daytime telephone number 981-2721. Brenda t N~ A y~,rF ` .w `' a ~, 18 ' ~c 88 SFSCUICENTENN`P All AMERICA CITY ~, ' ~ I I' I ~~~~~~,~ 1979 ~~~ ~~ 1989 ~~~ COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR M E M O R A If D U M ELMER C. HODGE TO: Memjb~ers o _t~e Board of Supervisors ~- FROM: Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator BOARD OF SUPERVISORS RICHARD W. BORERS. CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT STEVEN A. MCGRAW. VICE-CHAIRMAN CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT LEE B. EDDY WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT DATE: October 9, 1990 SUBJECT: Appointments to the Regional Airport Commission At the September 12, 1990 board meeting, Supervisor Johnson asked that this item be placed on the October 9, 1990 agenda for discussion. By memorandum today, Supervisor McGraw also requested discussion of this item at today's meeting. Chairman Dick Robers will be absent from today's meeting and I felt it would Le appropriate to postpone this item until October 23. Mr. Robers is a member of the Airport Commission and should be present to offer his views when the discussion takes place. This item will be placed on the October 23rd agenda and I will prepare a report for approval. I ask that each of you forward to me suggestions on a recommendation from the Board of Supervisors to the Airport Commission members that future appointments be made from the business community. P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24018-0798 (703) 772-2004 PUBLIC NOTICE Please be advised that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, at its meeting on October 23, 1990, at the Roanoke County Administration Center, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, Roanoke, Virginia, at the evening session beginning at 7:00 p.m. will hold a public hearing on the following: RESOLUTION SUPPORTING THE DESIGNATION OF PROPERTY OF ROANOKE REBOS INC. AS EXEMPT FROM TAXATION BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF VIRGINIA All members of the public interested in the matter set forth above may appear and be heard at the time and place aforesaid. Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney Roanoke County, Virgin' Publish on the following date in the morning edition: Wednesday, October 17, 1990 Send invoice to: Board of Supervisors P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 ATTENTION: MRS. MARY ALLEN LEGAL NOTICE ROANORE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, October 23, 1990, in the Community Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, Roanoke, VA, on the petition of W. E. Cundiff locatedoon 1.301 acres from R-1 to R-3 to construct apartments, Feather Road, .1 mile south of its intersection with VA 24, Vinton Magisterial District. A copy of this application is available for inspection in the Department of Planning and Zoning, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, Roanoke, VA. Dated: October 3, 1990 Mary H. lien, Clerk Please publish in the evening edition of the Roanoke Times & World-News Tuesday, October 9, 1990 Tuesday, October 16, 1990 Direct the bill for publication to: W. E. Cundiff c/o Shanks Associates 313 Luck Avenue Roanoke, VA 24011 (703) 343-6685 SEND AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION TO: ROANORE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT P.O. BOX 29800, ROANORE, VA 24018 LEGAL NOTICE ROANORE COUNTY BOARD OF BUPERVISORS The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, October 23, 1990, in the Community Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, Roanoke, VA, on the petition of Industrial Development Authority to amend the Future Land Use Plan map designation of approximately 175 acres from Development to Principal Industrial and to rezone approximately 125 acres of said property from M-1 to M-2 for industrial development, located south of the intersection os US 11/460 (West Main Street) and Route 612 (Barley Drive) and adjacent to and west of the N&W Railway, Catawba Magisterial District. A copy of this application is available for inspection in the Department of Planning and Zoning, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, Roanoke, VA. Dated: October 3, 1990 `17') ~~ Mary H. Al en, Clerk Please publish in the evening edition of the Roanoke Times & World-News Tuesday, October 9, 1990 Tuesday, October 16, 1990 Direct the bill for publication to: Industrial Development Authority c/o Ed Natt P.O. Box 20068 Roanoke, VA 24018 (703) 774-1197 SEND AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION TO: ROANORE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT P.O. B07C 29800, ROANORE, VA 24018 LEGAL NOTICE ROANORE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, October 23, 1990, in the Community Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, Roanoke, VA, on the petition of Steve Brown to rezone 12.3 acres from R-1 to R-E to construct a golf course, located along Wolf Creek between Hardy Road and VA 24, Vinton Magisterial District. A copy of this application is available for inspection in the Department of Planning and Zoning, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, Roanoke, VA. Dated: October 3, 1990 Mary H. A len, Clerk Please publish in the evening edition of the Roanoke Times & World-News Tuesday, October 9, 1990 Tuesday, October 16, 1990 Direct the bill for publication to: Steve Brown c/o Shanks Associates 313 Luck Avenue Roanoke, VA 24011 (703) 343-6685 SEND AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION TO: ROANORE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT P.O. BOX 29800, ROANORE, VA 24018 LAW OFFICES OSTERHOl1DT, FERGl1SON, NATT, AHERON £~ AGEE A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION CHARLES H. OSTERHOUDT MICHAEL 5. FERGUSON EDWARD A. NATT MICHAEL J. AHERON G. STEVEN AGEE MARK D. KIDD 1919 ELECTRIC ROAD, 5. W. P.O BOX 20068 ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018 October 4, 1990 TELEPHONE 703-7 74- 1197 FAX NO. 703-774-0961 Board of Supervisors County of Roanoke P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 RE: Roanoke County Industrial Development Authority Rezoning Gentlemen: This letter will offer as additional proffers to the above rezoning, to be considered by the Board of Supervisors on October 23rd, 1990, the following proffers: 1. That the use of the property will be limited to the manufacture and assembly of products. 2. That vehicular access will be limited to Route i1-460. No vehicular access will be permitted off of Yale Drive. Rail access will be permitted to the property. 3. The height of the principal structures, regulated by the provisions of the ordinance, on the premises shall not exceed 60 feet measured from the ground level at the structure. 4. A buffer zone shall be structure or outside storage adjoining existing residentially shall be a minimum of 200 feet. established from any principal facility to any property line zoned property. This buffer zone 5. The measured noise omissions from the facility shall not exceed 80DbA over a 1 hour test period at the property line adjoining any existing residentially zoned or residentially used property. 6. Lighting shall be directed away from any adjoining residential property. Lighting poles shall not exceed 40 feet in height measured from the gro andlesdat the pavementelevel lumen level of approximately 4 foot c Respectfully submitted, INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENVIRGINOIAITY OF ROANOKE COUNTY, By Edward A. Natt. is Attorney SALEM WEST CORPORATION By Its /bp BOARD 1~ELTI~'G AGENBA ITE:~iS r r P,F,P?RTa'1ENT OF FI*jAs1CF. F 10;1 T.~L OCTOBER 23,1990 and recognitions d from the resolu`~lonsc ~ ~y~rmance Awar ? proclama`~ions, ~ ~ ,,a~~=`Y -,~,-.=,. ' A,pres2:,t"tion of LhC~ool. ~ irgir~ia :~tur~i~s : al II.NG~~ Business ~.--T Cash for Youth Haven II. A.Increase cf rz`--- III.Raports ro riated Balance A.General Fund Unappropriated Balance B,Capital Fund Unarm-Contingency ended f Income and Expense for the three months C.Reserve for Bca~d D.Arlalysis ° 1990 C2ptember 30, ~a~.~ . `, i ~, i ~/~ . ' or / ~~ ` ~ ~ `I y~ ~ T ~ l /~, . , _ I~~~~: d ,~ .. ~ y. ~. a " ~--, / ,-„ ~ ~ "~[ ~. i ~~ ,/''~ r~~ ~_ i n ',,' / % ~~,, 4 ~L i~~~^L' {, V J ~~ /~: Y l ~ ~ ~- a AT A SPECIAL MEETING OF THE BOARD OF ES COUNTYSADMINISTRATOON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. HELD AT THE ROANOK 1987 CENTER ON WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 18, RESOLUTION 21887-1 TO THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY SUPPOR INT G TAX EXEMPTION OF PROPERTY OWNED BY RICHFIELD NURSING CENTER AND USED FOR CHARITABLE AND BENEVOLENT PURPOSES ON A NONPROFIT BASIS BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virg.i.nia, as follows: WHEREAS, Richfield Nursing Center has requested this Board, pur=scant to Section 30-19.04 of the Code of Virginia, as amended to adc}pt a resolut~.on Q3dressed to the General ?>,~embly to classify and designate as exempt from taxation pursuant to Section 6 (a) (6) c,f Article X «f t"~e Constitution of Virginia, roperty located in the County of Roanoke, owned by it and used p for charitable and benevolent purposes; ~~~d WHEREAS, a public hearing at Which all citi•a,ens had alp 0 ortunity to be heard with respect to the request of Richfif~~ld pp 1987; Nursing Center was held by the Board of Febrr?ary 18, WHEREAS, the Board has examined and considered the provisions of subsection B of Section 30-19.04 of the Code of Virginia; BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roazaoke supports the classification and d~~signati.on of Richfield ~~Iursing C.eriter as a charitable a.nd benevo!tint organizatic..n; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Beard supports the exemption f_ram taxation of property located in the County of Roanoke, owned by Richfield Nursing Canter, and used excl~.lsively r by it for charitable and benevolent purposes on a nonprofit basis. On motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by Supervisor McGraw, and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickens, ,;ohnson NAYS: None P~~~ry H. A11en,~Deputy Clerk 2/18/87 CC: File Commissioner of the Revenue Assistant County Administrator for Mar~~agement Services Real Estate Assessor County Attorney Members of the Virginia General :assembly (Hand delivered AT A SPECIAL MEETING OF 'PHE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON tNEDNESDAY, F'FBRUARY 18, 1987 RESOLUTION 21887-2 TO THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY SUPPORTING TAX EXEMPTION OF PROPERTY OWNED BY RICHFIELD RETIREMENT COMMUNI`1'Y AND USED FOR CHARITABLE AND BENEVOLENT PURPOSES ON A NONPROFIT BASIS BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: WHEREAS, Rio field Retirement Comm.~nity has requested ti~is Board, pursuant to Section 30-19.04 of the Code of Virginia, as amended t.o adopt a re~~olution addressed 'co the General Assembly to classify and designate as exempt from taxation (pursuant to Section 6 (a) (6) of Article X of the Constitution of Virginia, property located in the County of Roanoke, owned by it and used for charitable and benevolent purposes; and WHEREAS, a public hearing at which all citizens had an opportunity to be heard with respect to the request of Richfield Retirement Community was held by the Board of February 18, 1987; WHEREAS, the Board has examined and considered the provisi~~ns of subsection B of Section 30-19.04 of the Code of Virginij; BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of the County oL- Roanoke supports the cJ_assifir_ation and designation of Richfield ':;etirement Community as a charitable and benevolent organization; and BE IT FUR`1'HER RESOLVED that the Board supports the exemption from taxation of property located in the County of Roanoke, owned Uy Richfield Retirement Comrunity, and used exclusively by it for charitable and benevolent purposes on a nonprofit basis. On motion of Supervisor Nickens, seconded by Supervisor McGraw. acid upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, N-ckens, Johnson NAYS: None ~ _ _ __ Mary H. Allen, Deputy RClerk 2/18/87 CC: File Commissioner of the Revenue Assistant County Administrator for Management Services Real Estate Assessor County Attorney D4embers of the Virginia General Assembly (Hand delivered SPECIAL MEETING OF THE BOARDNOKESCOUNTYSADMINISTRATOON AT A HELD AT THE ROA 1987 COUNTY, VIRGINIA, FEBRUARY 18, CENTER, ON WEDNESDAYr RESOLUTION 218_--3 TO THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY S~EDRgyNEDINBURGHt,,iSQUAREOF PROPERTY 0 FOUNDATION, INC. AND USED FOR CHARITABLE AND ISF NANDLMEMORIALOIZING A A NON-PROFIT BA CERTAIN AGREEMENT B~NCEEANDDTHEUCOUNTY SQUARE FOUNDATION, WHEREAS, Edinburgh Square Foundation, Inc. (hereinafter ~~ etitioned this Boa ;_d for support for a the "Petitioner ), has p - introduced at t-he 1987 Session of the General Assembly bill to be to exempt certain property of the Petitioner from taxation t to Article X, Section 6(a)(6) of the Constitution of pl_irsuan Virginia; and WHEREAS, a public hearing at which all citizens had an to be heard with respect to the Petitioner's request opportunity was held by the Board on February 18, 1987; and WHEREAS, the provisions of subsection B of Section 30- ode of Virginia (1950), as amended, have been examined 19.04, C and. considered by the Board; and ro erty to be WHEREAS, the Petitioner agrees that the p p t from taxation is the personal property of i_he Petitioner exemp necessary to and its buildings and as much land as is re<sonably ro er- e use of its buildings, provided such personal and real p p th 11 be used by the Petitioner excl~~si.vely for char_itabl_e aiz ty sha and benevolent purposes on non-profit basis; WHEREAS, in consideration of the Board's adoption of 's Resolution and the Board's support of a bill hereinafter thi described in Paragraph 1 to be introduced on behalf of the Peti- tioner at the 1987 Session of the General Assembly, the Petition- er has voluntarily agreed to pay each year a service fee in an amount equal to twenty percent (20$) of the County of Roanoke real prc:~erty tax levies, which would be applicable to the proper- of the Petitioner were the Petitioner not exempt from such ty taxation, for so long as the Petitioner's property is exempted from State and local taxation. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. The County supports a bill to be introduced at the 1987 Session of the General Assembly whereby Edinburgh Square Foundation, Inc., a non°profit organization, seeks to be classified and designated a charitable and benevolent organization within the context of Section 6(a)(6) of Article X of the Constitution of Virginia, and ~4~hereby property owned by the Petitioner, which is used by it exclusively for charitable and benevolent purposes on a non--profit basis, shall be exempt from State and local taxation. 2. In consideration of the Board's adoption of this Resolution and the Board's support of the bill descrihed in Para- graph 1 of this Resolution to be introduced at the 1987 Session of the General Assembly, the Petitioner agrees to pay to the County of Roanoke an annual service fee in an amount equal to twenty percent (20 $) of the County of Roanoke real property tax levies, which would be applicable t~ property of the Petitioner in the County of Roanoke, were the Petitioner not exempt from State and local taxation, for so long as the Petitioner is exempted from State and local taxation. 3, The Deputy Clerk is directed to forward an attested copy of this Resolution to the Commissioner of the Revenue and _ the Treasurer for purposes of assessment and collection, respec tively, of the service fee established by this Resolution, and to the Petitioner. On motion of Supervisor Brittle, seconded by Supervisor Nickens, and upon the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Brittle, Garrett, McGraw, Nickt~ns, Johnson NAYS: None Mary H. Allen, Acting Deputy Clerk CC: File Commissioner of the Revenue ement Services Assistant County Administrator for Manag Real Estate Assessor County Attorney Hand delivered) Members of the General Assembly § 30-19.04 GENERAL ASSEMBLY § 30-19.04 1940, p. 363; 1952, c. 234; 1960, c. 147; 1973, cc. 242, 322; 1984, c. 703; 1987, c. 192.) The 1987 amendment inserted "reconvened or veto session or of any" preceding "commis- sion, council, committee" in clause (ii) of the first sentence, substituted "three days" for "seven days" in the proviso at the end of the first sentence, and rewrote the second sen- tence, which formerly read "The period re- quired by any statute or rule for the filing of any pleading or the performance of any act relating thereto shall be extended until thirty days after any such session." § 30-19.04. Legislative designation of associations, organizations, etc., exempt from taxation; resolution of local governing body re- quired. - A. When any legislation involving the designation of property to be exempted from taxation pursuant to Article X, Section 6 (a) (6) of the Constitution of Virginia is referred to a committee of the General Assembly, the chairman of the committee shall require, prior to consideration by the committee of the legislation, a resolution adopted, in accordance with the requirements of subsection B, by the governing body of the county, city or town wherein such property is situated supporting or refusing to support such exemption or evidence that a formal and timely request has been made to the governing body of such county, city or town for the adoption of such resolution and the governing body thereof has failed to act on the request or otherwise refused to adopt such a resolution. B. The resolution required by subsection A shall be adopted only after holding a public hearing with respect thereto, at which citizens shall have an opportunity to be heard. The local governing body shall publish notice of the hearing once in a newspaper of general circulation in the county, city or town where the real property zs located. The public hearing shall not be held until at least five days after the notice is published in the newspaper. The local governing body may collect the cost of publication from the organization requesting the property tax exemption. Before adopting any such resolution the governing body shall consider the following questions: 1. Whether the organization is exempt from taxation pursuant to § 501 (c) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954; 2. Whether a current annual alcoholic beverage license for serving alcoholic beverages has been issued by the Alcoholic Beverage Control Board to such organization, for use on such property; 3. Whether any director or officer of the organization is paid compensation in excess of a reasonable allowance for salaries or other compensation for personal services which such director or officer actually renders; 4. Whether any part of the net earnings of such organization inures to the benefit of any individual, and whether any significant portion of the service provided by such organization is generated by funds received from donations, contributions or local, state or federal grants. As used in this subsection, donations shall include the providing of personal services or the contribution of in kind or other material services; 5. Whether the organization provides services for the common good of the public; 6. Whether a substantial part of the activities of the organization involves carrying on propaganda, or otherwise attempting to influence legislation and whether the organization participates in, or intervenes in, any political campaign on behalf of any candidate for public office; 7. No rule, regulation, policy, or practice of the organization discriminates on the basis of religious conviction, race, color, sex or national origin; and 8. Any other criteria, facts and circumstances which the governing body deems pertinent to the adoption of such resolution. 144 ,~..;~. ,~ ~~. § 30-19.04 322; 1984, c. 703; 1987, c. ormerly read "The period re- ~tatute or rule for the filing of ~r the performance of any act ~ shall be extended until thirty such session." iations, organizations, it governing body re- esignation of property to Section 6 (a) (6) of the .f the General Assembly, to consideration by the in accordance with the ly of the county, city or refusing to support such est has been made to the '.option of such resolution the request or otherwise 1 be adopted only after ch citizens shall have an call publish notice of the the county, city or town g shall not be held until ie newspaper. The local from the organization ;ing any such resolution lestions: on pursuant to § 501 (c) ge license for serving Beverage Control Board on is paid compensation other compensation for ually renders; ganization inures to the zt portion of the service •eceived from donations, ised in this subsection, iices or the contribution the common good of the ie organization involves afluence legislation and venes in, any political ice; anization discriminates or national origin; and ich the governing body 3 30-19.05 GENERAL ASSEMBLY AND OFFICERS THEREOF § 30-19.05 C. Any resolutiob e t on B have been examinedland cons dered by the local the provisions of su cit or town supports exemption, the resolution governing body. If the county, Y . for a specific shall also include a recommendation to the General Assembly classification (religious, charitable, patriotic, historical, benevolent, cultural or public park and playground). D. The enactment of any statute exempting an organization from taxation by designation as provided herein shall be conclusive proof that the provisions of this section have been satisfied. (1980, c. 327; 1987, c. 338; 1988, c. 257.) d The 1987 amendment substituted "Article g, Section 6 (a) (6) of the Constitution of Virginia" for "Article X, 3 6 l'a) (6Y' near the beginning of subsection A and added the d entence of subsection C. The 1988 amendment added the secon through fourth sentences in the introductory language of subsection B. secon s slative consideration of exemptions from the retail § 30-19.05. Legi le islation involving an exemption or sales and use tax. - A• When any g ursuant to Chapter 6 (§ 58.1-600 exclusion from the retail sales and use tax p rior to the et seq.) of Title 58.1 is referred to a committee of the General Assembly, the chairman of the committee shall regeire ~~ tteee submi ~ the following consideration of the legislation by information: 1. Estimate of state and local revenues which will be foregone as a direc result of the exemption; 2. Beneficiaries of the exemption; 3. Direct or indirect local, state or federal government assistance received by the person seeking exemption; is exempt 4. The extent to which the person, property, service or industry from the retail sales and us constitutional or judicial mandates in favor of 5. Any external statutory, the exemption; erson, property, service or industry is 6. Other state taxes to which the p subject; 7. Similar taxpayers who are not entitled to a retail sales and use ax exemption; and be relevant to the 8. Other criteria, facts or circumstances which may request for exemption. B. Nothing contained in subsection A shall prevent the enactment o an exemption withou ted b It he Governorlro ris otherwise considered to be of such specifically reques Y a nature that the chairman of the committee determines that the information is not required. C. The Secre licy im act of each exemption gategor yset out in §h58~1S608 economic and po y P of this Code. The Secretary shall repoDecemblerllg andt shall report on two Finance Committees each year by exemption cateSession of the General Assembly according totthefoll wing with the 1990 schedule: Year Category 1990 1. Government and Commodities 1990 2. Agricultural 1991 3. Commercial and Industrial 1991 4. Educational 1992 5. Services 145 ~~~ ~' o ~ ~ ~ d ~ ~ ~ O N cn ~ ,.d C o (D ~ ~ Q-. c~ Q' ~ ~ 0 ~ dO' d O ~ C ~ O co n~~ ~,~ ~ ~ ~o C 0 0 ~~~~da ~`~ ~ o .~ ~ o ~n~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~~ o ~~ ~ ~ ~, o ~ ~ ~, o ~ ~ o bra ~5~~ o ~~~ ~-' O ~ ~ ~ coo ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~o o ~ ° ~ '~. o ~ a. ~ a oho ~~.~o~'o s~ `o ~ ~, C ~ ~ -~ ~ ~ ~ o a ~ ~~ Q" ~ ~" ~ ~ ~ ~, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~, ~ ~.~' O ~ O (~ n C. ~., -r- cn d (D ~ ~ rd ~.. O X ~^ dQ ~ '~ .-. dQ ~-s ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ = ~ o ~ ~° ~ ~ ~' o ~ . . ~a '~' p 0 ~a ag. ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ° ra x ~ a. o o ~, ~ °- ~ ~ ° ~ o o ~ ~ as ~ ~ ~ o a ~ ~ ~ ,~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N a ~ ~ _ ` ~. ~ ~ ~' '~ `° ~ ~ ~ ~o ~ ~ do. o ~ 3 c ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ o o V. o ~ ~ ~' '~ ~ o ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ¢ `~ ~, ~ ~ ° ~ .° ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ° ~ ~ ~ ~ ° ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~° o a o . a ~ ~ ~ ° ~ ~ ~ b d ~" (D ~ ~' ~ ~ ~' ~ ~ ~ ~ ° (D r ~ ~ ~ O ~ N ~ ~ 1 N ~. ~ ( N .-+~ O~ POANp~.F` .~ ~ ~ Z Z OJ a ~a ~E5~1 as ,rFSQU1CENTENN`P A Benuli~ulBil;~enulK COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE September 20, 1990 Rev. D. Michael Meloy Windsor Hills United Methodist Church 3591 Windsor Road, S.W Roanoke, YA 24018 Dear Reverend Meloy: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS RICHARD W~ ROBER$. CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT STEVEN A. cnMTAwsn MAGISTER AL{ DISTRICT LEE B. EDDY WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT On behalf of the Board This will confirm our telephone conversation of today. ive the invocation of Supervisors, I would like to thank you for agreeing t ~ ~e meetings are October 23, 1990, at 3:00 p. at their meeting on Tuesday, Administration held at 3738 Brambleton Avenue, in the Roanoke County Center Community Room. I will call ou as a reminder. If you On Monday before the board meeting, y lease let me know so find at any time that you are unable to ~ thl~f hone number is 772-2005. that other arrangements can be made. y P our schedule is, and they The Board members are aware °.f hOW a God's blessing at their meeting. appreciate your volunteering the time to o,~' Sincerely, Brenda I• Holton, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisor bjh All AMERICA CITY ~~ '' I ~'' rtrt~~(~~~ 1979 ,~i~' Y 198 ~~ (~~~xn~ .~ P.O- BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24018-0798 (703) 772-2004 --- -~ __ _ _ ___ _ _. __ - ~~C gF.ARING E. on October 23, 1990 to Request for a public hearing nest of Roanoke ort of the req adopt a resolution in supP status from the General Rebos, Inc. for tax-exemp Assembly REQUESTS FOR P 1. E MOTION TO SET PTTBLIC I~[FA~G LB FOR 10/?•3/90 AYES-LBE,SAM~I-~T NAYS-HCN ABSENT-R~ NONE F. REQ~ST FOR WOE SESSIONS G. FIRST RF,,ADING OF ORDINANCES 1. imposing or Ordinance gland Recreation Ordinance rescinding increasing user fees for the Parks 4 4. An ordinance to rezone approximately 125 acres from M- 1 to M-2 and amend the Future Land Use Plan map designation of approximately 175 acres from Development to Principal Industrial to allow industrial development, located south of the intersection of US 11/460 (West Main Street) and Route 612 (Barley Drive) and adjacent to and west of the N&W Railway, Catawba Magisterial District, upon the petition of the Industrial Development Authority. H. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS SUPERVISOR EDDY: (1) ASKED FOR UPDATE ON STATUS OF CABLE TV FRANCHISE. SAM REPORTED NEXT MEETING ON 9/28 AND SHOULD HAVE AGREEMENT BY END OF YEAR. (2) UPDATED BOARD ON RECENT MEETINGS REGARDING SEABOARD FARMS COMPLAIIVTS. (3) QUESTIONED WHETHER JUSTICE DEPARTMENT HAS RULED ON FINAL PLAN FOR CONSOLIDATION VOTE. PMM ADVISED THEY HAVE NOT. (4) THANI~D FELLOW BOARD MEMBERS FOR ADDING IEIIM TO DEMOCRATIC PARTY MAILING LIST BUT DECLINED. SUPERVISOR ROBERS: (1) SMART HIGHWAY UPDATE. NEXT MEETING IN FEBRUARY, 1991. (2) REPORTED ON AIRPORT COMII~IISSION P~I:TREAT. (3) WII.L BE MEETING WITH GOVERNOR WILDER AND SEVEN OTHER GOVERNORS IN ATLANTA OCT 9 TO DISCUSS BUSINESS RELATIONS WITH JAPAN. I. APPOIlVTMENTS NONE 1. Board of Zoning Appeals 2. Building Code Board of Adjustments and Appeals 3. Grievance Panel 5 ,r r~ ! ~, J , ; ,% ~ '' ~;,; ~( r '" ,_ ~ r ' } ,~ (, i fit? /, f ~.}' L [. 1, c-' LG '~ ~~ !i1 --~ " ~~`l /- ~~i..lL+~7.o-4-t-~ t~ ~~.~ r // ~, ~1~~ ~.~~ .t.-~ ~-t~ Eha1'" ~'el_ ~) ,~c~d .~ ~f ~ _~ "~. /~° r'~~~ ~~ ~~ ULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SyPADMINISTRATIONACENTER ONTY, AT A REG VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUN WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 12, 1990 ORDINANCE VACATING A PORTION OF A TWENTY (20) FOOT Sp,NITARY SEWER EASEMENT UPON RAEQUDISTRICTDINBURGH SQUARE FOUNDATION, HOLLINS MAGISTERI WHEREAS, Edinburgh Square Foundation, the developer of an has requested the adult-care facility known as Edinburgh Greens, d of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia to vacate a Boar dedicated ortion of a twenty (20) foot sanitary sewer easement, P a e 405 in the P g to the County by deed found in Deed Book 562, of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Office Virginia; and, REAS Section 15.1-482 (b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, WHE lished by the as amended, requires that such action be accomp the governing body; and, adoption of an ordinance by gection 15.1- iven as required by WHEREAS, notice has been g~ the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and a first reading 431 of ublic tember 12, 1990; and the p of this ordinance was held on Sep tember hearing and second reading of this ordinance was held on Sep 25, 1990. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 20 foot sanitary sewer 1, That a portion of a twenty ( ) five-story adult-care easement located adjacent to an existing lat prepared by facility known as Edinburgh Greens as shown on p n Associates, P.C., dated 8 August 1990, entitled "Portion Lumsde 0' Sanitary Sewer Easement," said easement dedicated to Roanoke of 2 deed. found in Deed Book 562, at page 405 in the afore- County by 'd Clerk's office, be, and hereby is, vacated pursuant to Section sai 15.1-482(b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended; and, 2, That as a condition of the adoption of this ordinance, ur h Square Foundation hereby agrees to pay all costs and Edinb g nses required to vacate and relocate this easement and the expe sanitary sewer line therein; and, 3, That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect All ordinances or parts thirty (30) days after its final passage. f ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, 0 are, repealed. and the same hereby 4. That Edinburgh Square Foundation shall record a certified of this ordinance with the Clerk of the Circuit Court and copy shall pay all fees required to accomplish this transaction. j TAX X38.12--4--11 ' TAX #38.12-4-10 I I NOW OR FOPMERLY I I NOW OR FORMERLY I PCOPERTY OF I DALLAS G. JARRELL & PROPERTI' OF HERITAGE INVESTMENTS TOWNSIUE CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. JOYCE H. JARRELL D.B. 1199 PG. 55 •, D.B. 1201 PG. 445 _"__ S89'46'S2"E .133.60' C I 341 50' I PETERS CREEK OAD i _ --- ,lit~ I __ ~ o i ~ ~~ ~ o ~~ o I ° o .~ o I ~ ~ ~ 'SITE Q ~ Q ~ z Q ._ HER~A~ERGER a ~ LOCATION MAP l NO SCALE EXISTING -ip~~5p 20' SANITARY ___ 6~1 ~2A SEWER EASEMENT i 5 - D.B. 562 PG. 405 (J EXISTING --_-- 20' SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT TO BE VACATED POfZTION OF EXISTING 20' SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT TO BE VACATEQ LINE DIRECTION DISTANCE 1-2 N 04'22'09" E 274.73' 2-3 S 41'03'35" E 28.07' 3-4 S 04'22'09" W 211.59' 4-1 N 29'05'37" E 47.82' TOTAL AREA 4,863 s ft. TAX #38.16 fJOW OR FORMERLY ~"~ PROPERTY OF I FIRST MORTGAGE M j CORP. ET AL f o° ~ D.B. 1154 PG 7321 z TAX /38.16--1 -1.1 PROPERTY OF EDINBURGH SQUARE FOUNDATION A VIRGINIA CORPORATION ~ C.B. 1226 PG. 1508 ~ .,A,. n == 11'50'16" R = 1233.24' T = 127.86' L = 254.80' CHORD S66'40'OS"W 254.35' / 3 ~ ' ~ ~ N N r~ _ ~'= ~ - ~) - cn r*i ~ ~ /PROPOSED ' SANITARY 20 SEWER EASEMEN ~ / Og„W _-_ 46 S80^ _ 185.97' ~~ -+ m D ~ mo -o ~ (h 00 ~2 '~ ~ ~! - ~ ~~ o' n~z ~ N ~ cn w ~ o I -D ~ r I r N N cn c~ ~ ~ L) EXISTING ~ U, -20' SANITARY _~ EWER EASEMENT ~ No B. 562 PG. 405 ~; ~1 ~ ~ 0 ~ w ~ ~ ~ c,' ci 1 ~ ~: ~~ ~ 3~ i h~ ~~ Shp ~p6 "I ~. ~-,~` „ P ~r ~ ~ ~O' (~+_~ ~ B. LEE 7. ~ `~ U HENDERSON, JR. ~ ~~ No. 1480 ~~~ PLAT SHOWItJG ~~N~ suR~~°~~~~ VACA TIGN OF N~~N~~~+1 PORTION OF 20' SANITARY SE~YER EASI~IENT PROPERTY OF EDINBURGH SQUARE FOUNDATION A VIRGINIA CORPORATION LOCATED IN HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA SCALE: 1" - 100' DATE: B AUGUST 1990 LUMSDEN ASSOCIATES, P.C. ENGINEERS - SURVEYORS - PLANNERS ~LTH Op'~~~ t ROANOKE, VIRGINIA COMM. #90--004 L E G A L N O T I C E iven to all interested persons that the Notice is hereby g ublic hearing at Roanoke County Board of Supervisors wilOCTOBERa 23, 1990, in the their 7:00 p.m. session on Tuesday, 3738 Community Room at the Roanoke Coetitionmof Rhea EDINBURGH SQUARE Brambleton Avenue S . W . on the p FOUNDATION requesting vacation of 250 FEET OF AN EXISTING 20 FOOT WIDE SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT LOCATED IN THE HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT. of the documents related to this request may be A copy examined in the offitethe RoanokeeCountynAdmini tration Center. Inspections, located a Given under my hand this 21ST DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1990. ~' Mary H. Allen, Clerk to the Board Roanoke County Board of Supervisors PLEASE PUBLISH IN THE EVENING EDITION OF THE ROANOKE TIMES AND WORLD NEWS ON: TUESDAY, OCTOBER 9, 1990 TUESDAY, OCTOBER 16, 1990 Direct the Bill for Publication to: Robert McNichols Edinburgh Square Foundation 129 Hershberger Road N. W- Roanoke, Virginia 24012 PpANp~.~ °~ ~, w ~ ~; Z Z o a ~ So. 88 ~ a ~-~ SFSQUiCENTENN`P~ ~ B,.uuiiu~B~~;innin~ COUNT`( ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE October 9, 1990 C~aim~~ v~ ~,~v~tnvl~r Willis, Sr., Chairman Mr. Gordon C• The University Connection 1010 Dominion Bank Building Roanoke, Virginia 24011 ,~ _.. ~... ~ ALLALL A I 1979 19a9 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS RICHARD W. ROBERS. CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MA V CERCHAIRMAN STEVEN A. MGGRAW. CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DI EDDY LEE B. WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERI JOHNSON BOB L. HOLLINS MAGISTERI N CKENS HARRY C. VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT Dear Mr. Willis: requesting that Roanoke letter legislative package a I received in units 1991 hway connection County include resolution of support for the direct hig between Virginia Tech and I-81. lution will be prepared and includcopiesa will be sent Such a reso lease just let me Messrs. Millikf nfurtheru assistance, p If I may be o know. ou s- Very truly Y %~ _ ~...r ~ c'A`~ ri,-~ / Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ECH/meh Mary H. Allen, Clerk cc -Mrs. ervisors Board of Sup 600 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24018-0798 (703) 772 2004 P.O. BOX 29 RESOLUTION the members of Roanoke County have previously gone WHEREAS, hwa connection on record in support of the proposed direct hig Y between Virginia Tech and the Roanoke Valley, and WHEREAS, the Virginia Department of Transportation has included this project in its six-year plan for transportation improvements, WHEREAS, the Virginia Department of Trans o0 osed routes continuing preliminary environmental studies on a pr p NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that Roanoke County reaffirms and urges continued state support for its support for the highway, the proposed planning, environmental and engineering studies along route. PETERS TAX #38.12-4-10 NOW OR FORMERLY PROPERTY OF DALLAS G. JARRELL JOYCE H. JARRELL D.B. 1201, PG. 445 20' P~E~EMENI~~R 5. = s 1 TAX #38.12-4-11 NOW bR FORMERLY PROPERTY OF I I HERITAGE INVESTMT ONSCO., INC &TOWNSIDE CONSTRUC :D.B. 1199 IPG. 55 .. S89'46'S2" 341.50' EXISTING 20' SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT D.B. 562, PG. 405: 20' SANITARY SE EASEMENT TO BE VACATE PROPOSED 20' SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT - 124.24' 15' DRAINAGE .. ASEMENT ~ of w ~i •;:. Q N N w -P m TAX #38.16-1-1 ~ `:~~' H NOW OR FORMERLY TAX #38.16-1-1.1 PROPERTY OF FIRST MORTGAGE PROPER S UARE ~ C EDINBURG Q 10 CORP. ET AL B. 1154, PG. 7321 D „W FOUNDATION A VIRGINIA CORPORATIbN ••S~a•o9'2~ 508 6 66, . . . 16 D.B. 1226, PG. 1 w \ ~ ~ O O ~ . `~' "~ EXISTING ~ 20' SANITARY ~ ~•° o z SEWER EASEMENT , D.B. 562, PG. 405 ~ PROPOSED NEW ., ,. 15' DRAINAGE EASEMENT A LINE DIRECTION DISTANCE p = 11'50'15" B ~ ' A-B N 31'4140 \ E 100.40 R = 1233.24 8-C N OS'30~02 W 251:0 , T == 127.85' ' 0 D-E N 17'38'52" L = 254.79 W 291.76' CHORD = S66'39'12" E-F S 89'46 52 E 15.97 254.35' A LOCATION MAP NO SCALE 0 0 z 0 ~~ z a J n. 0 1 11~ ~ ~ Q SITE a ~ ~^ ~` Vj `~ d o~ ~-P N c0 0; ~~ 0 ~ W ~ ~ `'' o o ~ I ~~,,~1 ~ ~~` D~ S60 ti~6~ 0 a 0 I U rn ~~ Z I Q O J pp ~~ o I ~i N 2 ~ o o~ ~ U ww o~ 0 z~ Q n' ow ~- w ~~- ~~ 4~ O F-G S 17'38 52 E 289. ~ ~~s- . f G-H S 05'21 16 W 54.42 ~ ,~1 ~Q~r H_I S 05'30 02 E 256.07 O ~O ~",' i-J S 31'41 40 W 78.45 ~ g. LEE ~~' J-A S 60'44 57 W 30.89 "A" ~ c HENDERSON, JR. U Y AREA = 10 322 S.F. ~.Q~~,~,~,~,~..,qz. ~, No. 1480 ' -~`' " 4 v y1 t o i ~ Ag ~, ~ ~ ~~ PLAT SHOWING PROPOSED NEW~T20pp' SANITARSY SEWER EA CEMENT t- j~,~/r U~-.iL• L 1`I L' io l aJ D..ra'3,.r"~.:x, a~cs-~3i~iLaa:+~ ~ BEING DEDICATED TO THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE FOR PUBLIC USE .~ PROPERTY OF L+trt.. ~'~"~' ~''~'~" ~ ~~ q : Ec N ~' t 7 ,,,, ~~ a.,o !f ~ ,~~~ • r 1~~~- IY ~~ ~~ LAW OFFICES NATT, AHERON £~ AGEE FERGUSON , OSTERHOUDT, A PRO'ESSIONAL CORPORATION 1919 ELECTRIC ROAD, S W P O BOX 20068 CHARLES H. OSTERHOUDT N ROANOKE, VIRGINIA MIC HAEL S. FERGUSO EDWARD A. NATT 24018 MICHAEL J. AHERON G. STEVEN AGEE MARK D. KIDD October 5, 1990 Board of Supervisors County of Roanoke p• O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 RE: Roanoke County IndustrRezoning Development Authority TELEPHONE 703-774- 1197 FAX NO. 7 03- 7 7 4-096 I Gentlemen: This letter will offer a thedgoardnof Supervisors onh October rezoning, to be considered roffers• 23rd, 1990, the following p 1, That the use of the property will be limited to the manufacture and assembly of products. 2• That vehicular access wittedeoff of YaleoDrivee Ra 1 access vehicular access will be perms will be permitted to the property. 3• The height of the principal structures, regulated by the provisions of the ordinance, level atr the structure °t exceed 60 feet measured from the ground rincipal 4, A buffer zone shall be establishe~o fay property line structure or outside storage zonedlproperty. This buffer zone adjoining existing residentially shall be a minimum of 200 feet. 5• The measured noise omissions from the facility shall not exceed an average of 80DbA over a 1 hour test period at the line adjoining any existing residentially zoned or property ro erty. residentially used p p 6. Lighting shall be directed away from any adjoining residential property. Lighting poles shall not exceed 40 feet in height measured from the ground and shall not exceed a lumen level of approximately 4 foot candles at the pavement level. Respectfully submitted, INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA Edward A. Natt. Its Attorney SALEM WEST CORPORATION o ~--~ By Its f~crt vr- T {-Q.fure •~~/sssr/' O. /~'o d~ s ~'• /bp LAW OFFICES UDT, FERGUSON, NATTNAHERON £~ AGEE OSTERHO A PROFESSIONAL CO RPO RATIO 1919 ELECTRIC ROAD, S. W. p. O. BOX 20068 TELEPHONE 703-774-1197 CHARLES H. OSTERHOUDT MICHAEL 5. FERGUSON E D`NARD A. NATT RpANOKE, VIRGINIA 2QOl $ FAX NO. 703-774-0961 MICHAEL J. AHERON G. STEVEN AGEE MARK D. KIDD October 16, 1990 Board of. Supervisors County of Roanoke p, O. Box 29800 2~C1S Vir=~ inia Roanoke, Re: Roanoke County Industrial Development Authority Rezoning Gentlemen: ase find the proffers on the above mattel would Enclosed ple the owner and the applicant. ned by coming rezoning have now beeour placing these in the file for the up appreciate y on October 23rd. I ou in advance for your attention to this matter, Thanking Y am, Very truly yours, OSTERHOUDT, FERGUSON, NATT, p,HERON & AGEE, p•C• Edward A. Natt EAN/dle c: Mr. Dan Owen Mr. Terry Harrington Mr. Mark Heath Mr. Tim Gubala i_~ r-a ~ i _ 4_, r• ,~„-r..~..~.... `~ tRGiN t A I E',(`I t ~1S1N1':SS AFFAIRS PI2F,SII)FfI~T FOit ~ ~ Ic,r~ ON F,: (703) z~ l -5~ 51 1 ~~ FAX: ('703) 231-64'14 X ,~,IZA~~1riIc;SION ~A FAX '~' i{,I .,F.PI~I O 1 ~ _ ~~~-J o a~`" ~Vl n~ ~~~ ~ °J Z.~o (TF.S (including cwcr~____-_- N(a, OI 1 A County FAX Regarding Hotel Ronaoke ~ 4=1 Elmer, Ray and Minnis thank you for letting them review the resolution and proposed FAX concerning the Hotel Roanoke project. They have some recommendations regarding the wording of the FAX and summary of information. These suggestions are as follows: Add as a third "WHEREAS" WHEREAS, the City of Roanoke and Virginia Tech recognizes the opportunities to develop training, continuing education, conferences and convention opportunities in the Roanoke Valley, and Change ... renovate the Hotel to its former grandeur to renovate the Hotel to a first class factltty, and Add after the Honorable Douglas Wilder, Governor of Virginia, and the Roanoke Val- ley legislative delegation. Under A Universitm offic;alsahave Istated that no appropriated fundsnorr tudent fees read . Y will be used. Under recommendation, add to the end after Wilder, and the Roanoke Valley legisla- tive delegation. Made Johnson October 22, 1990 8:56 a.m. file/ctyfaxgv