The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About11/13/1990 - RegularAN + f -_ p Z 18 ~~ 88 +ESQUICENTEMM~~'~ ~ B..~uw~8~~~~~~g (~nuntg of ~aMnnl:e ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ACTION AGENDA NOVEMBER 13, 1990 ~u-~~ cm 1 " ~1 1~g~8~9 Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meeting. Regular meetings are held on the second Tuesday and the fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public hearings are held at 7:00 p.m on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. THIS IS THE ONLY BOARD MEETING SCHEDULED FOR THE MONTH OF NOVEMBER DECEMBER MEETINGS WII.L BE ON DECEMBER 4 AT 3:00 P.M. AND DECEMBER 18 AT 3:00 P.M. AND 7:00 P.M. A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.) 1. Roll Call AT 3:00 P.M. HCN ARRIVED AT 3:45 P.M. 2. Invocation: John M. Chambliss Assistant County Administrator 3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag. B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS RWR MOTION FOR BOARD OF SUPERVISORS TO PARTICIPATE IN QUARTERLY OR SEMI-ANNUAL MEETINGS WITH ROANOKE CITY, 1 SALEM, AND TOWN OF VINTON, DURING THE NEXT YEAR IN ORDER TO ADDRESS THOSE ISSUES THAT CROSS JURISDICTIONAL LINES URC WITH HCN ABSENT C. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS, AND AWARDS 1. Resolution supporting continued regional cooperation in the Roanoke Valley. R-111390-1 SAM MOTION TO ADOPT URC WITH HCN ABSENT LBE REQUESTED THAT COPIES BE SENT TO THE CLERK OF EACH LOCALITIES AT 5:03 P.M. BLJ MOTION TO RECONSIDER ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION UW HCN MOTION TO ADOPT RESOLUTION WITH ADDITION OF BOTETOURT COUNTY URC 2. Proclamation declaring the week of November 11 - 17, 1990 as American Education Week. BLJ MOTION TO APPROVE URC WITH HCN ABSENT 3. Introduction of new Executive Director of the Virginia Association of Counties a SAM INTRODUCED JAMES D. CAMPBELL, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, VACO, EFFECTIVE DECEMBER 1, 1990 4. Resolution of appreciation to Elmer C. Hodge, Jr. on his fifth anniversary as Roanoke County Administrator. R-111390-2 BLJ MOTION TO ADOPT RESOLUTION URC WITH HCN ABSENT D. NEW BUSINESS 1. Request for award of contract for water/sewer rate analysis. A-111390-3 BLJ MOTION STAFF RECOMMENDATION TO AWARD WATER AND SEWER FEASIBILITY STUDY TO BURNS & MCDONNELL LBE SUBSTITUTE MOTION THAT STUDY BE LIlVIITED TO WATER AND EXCLUDE SEWAGE AYES - LBE NAYS -SAM, BLJ, HCN, RWR BL,T ORIGINAL MOTION STAFF RECO11~Il1~NDATION AYES -SAM, BLJ, HCN, RWR NAYS - LBE 2. Appropriation of funds for Allied Signal economic development prospect. A-111390-4 SAM MOTION TO APPROPRIATE $875,000 FROM UNAPPROPRIATED BALANCE FOR LAND ACQUISITION AND ROAD IMPROVEMENTS 3 vRc TH ADVISED THAT CO1bIlVILTNITY MEETING HAS BEEN SET FOR NOVEMBER 27, 1990, AT 7 P.M. AT GLENVAR LIBRARY 3. Annual Report from the Mental Health Services of the Roanoke Valley PRESENTED BY DR HENRY SULLIVAN AND MS. MARY FARON RWR MOTION TO RECEIVE AND FILE REPORT URC 4. Request for additional funds to complete Read Mountain Fire Station. A-111390-5 BLJ MOTION TO APPROPRIATE $174,886 TO COMPLETE READ MOUNTAIN FIRE STATION LBE SUBSTITUTE MOTION TO REDUCE CONTINGENCY FUND TO 5% AND $10,000 FOR PAVING BACK CREEK FIRE STATION AYES - LBE NAYS -SAM, BLJ, HCN, RWR BLJ MOVED THE MAIN MOTION URC 5. Appropriation of funds to extend the contract of Cable TV consultant O. D. Page, P.E. A-111390-6 SAM MOTION TO APPROPRIATE $6,800 URC 4 E. REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS WORK SESSION SET FOR MONDAY, NOVEMBER 26, 1990, AT 3 P.M. FOR BOARD AND STAFF F. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC EIEARINGS NONE G. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance amending and reenacting Chapter 4, Amusements, Section 4-99, "Bingo Games and Raffles", of the Roanoke County Code, providing for an increase in the audit fee. HCN TO APPROVE 1ST READING 2ND - 12/04/90 URC 2. Ordinance amending and reenacting Chapter 21, Taxation of the Roanoke County Code to provide for a reduction in the amount of penalties for failure to file returns for Personal Property taxes. BLJ TO APPROVE 1ST READING 2ND - 12/04/90 URC 3. Ordinance amending the Roanoke County Code by the addition of provisions regulating smoking for the County of Roanoke. HCN TO APPROVE 1ST READING 2ND - 12/04/90 5 URC 4. Ordinance to authorize acquisition of parcel of land adjacent to Bonsack Well No. 1. BLJ TO APPROVE 1ST READING 2ND - 12/04/90 URC 5. Ordinance to authorize acquisition of parcel of land adjacent to Hidden Valley Well No. 9. LBE TO APPROVE 1ST READING 2ND - 12/04/90 URC 6. Ordinance authorizing abandonment and reconveyance of a well lot located on the north side of Burlington Drive in the Burlington Heights area of Roanoke County to Joseph N. and Grace M. Nackley. BL,T TO APPROVE 1ST READING 2ND - 12/04/90 URC H. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance at the request of Roanoke Gas Company to share a County water line easement. 0-111390-7 HCN TO ADOPT ORDINANCE URC 6 I. APPOINTMENTS 1. Board of Zoning Appeals 2. Building Code Board of Adjustments and Appeals LBE N011~IINATED RICHARD L. WII,LIAMS, CAVE SPRING DISTRICT 3. Explore Citizens Advisory Committee RWR NOMINATED PAM GLOVER, CAVE SPRING DISTRICT HCN NOMINATED C. W. CHURCH S, VINTON DISTRICT BLJ N011~IINATED DAVID LAYMAN, HOLLINS DISTRICT BLJ SUGGESTED TO PMM THAT DURING REDISTRICTING, CONSIDERATION SHOULD BE GIVEN TO PUTTING NORTH LAKES SUBDIVISION INTO ONE DISTRICT, AND ALSO HOW REDISTRICTING AFFECTS MEMBERSHIP IN COM1VII11'EES, C011~IlVIISSION AND BOARDS PMM ADVISED THAT PUBLIC HEARING ON REDISTRICTING WILL PROBABLY BE SET FOR SECOND MEETING IN JANUARY, 1991 4. Grievance Panel 5. Library Board 6. Mental Health Services Community Services Board LBE NOMINATED DR HENRY SULLIVAN FOR REAPPOINTMENT 7. Planning Commission SAM INTRODUCED AND NOMINATED 11ZARIAN F. CHAPPELLE, CATAWBA DISTRICT BI..,l REQUESTED THAT A RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION BE PRESENTED TO M.R. WINSTEAD AT A DECEMBER MEETING. BLJ REQUESTED THAT APPROPRIATE DOCUMENTATION FOR FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE BE SENT TO MRS. CHAPPELLE. 8. Recycling Advisory Committee RWR NOMINATED MARIELAYNA ROSSILLO, CAVE SPRING DISTRICT SAM NOMINATED MIKEIEL "NIIKEY" WIlVIlI~R, CATAWBA DISTRICT J. CONSENT AGENDA ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WII.L BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIItED, THAT ITEM WII•L BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WII.L BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY. R-111390-8 BLJ MOTION TO ADOPT RESOLUTION URC 1. Approval of Minutes - October 23, 1990 2. Confirmation of Committee Appointments to the Explore Citizens Advisory Committee and the Recycling Advisory Committee. A-111390-8.a s 3. Acceptance of water and sanitary sewer facilities serving Woodbridge Section 11. A-111390-8.b 4. Acceptance of water and sanitary sewer facilities serving Viking Court. A-111390-8.c 5. Acceptance of payment by ITT for reconstruction of sanitary sewer line. A-111390-8.d 6. Request for acceptance of Remington Road into the VDOT Secondary System. R-111390-8.e 7. Donation of drainage easements in connection with the Ingal Blvd. Project. A-111390-8.f K. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS SUPERVISOR EDDY: (1) REPORTED ON VISIT TO BENT MOUNTAIN SCHOOL WHICH WAS DEDICATED LAST SUNDAY. MADE A TOUR OF BACK CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL IN HONOR OF AMERICAN EDUCATION WEEK. (2) ADVISED BOARD THAT HE IS NOW WRITING AND MAILING OUT WINDSOR HILLS DISTRICT NEWSLE'TT'ER COMPLETELY AT HIS PERSONAL 9 EXPENSE. OFFERED TO ADD ANYONE INTERESTED TO HIS MAILING LIST. (3) APPRECIATED LEGISLATIVE ITEM THAT HE REQUESTED NOT BEING PUT ON AGENDA. (4) ASKED PMM IF REDISTRICTING WOULD AFFECT THE COUNTY CHARTER PMM ADVISED THAT NO CHANGES TO COUNTY CHARTER WOULD BE NECESSARY FOR THE VARIOUS ALTERNATIVES OF REDISTRICTING. PMM ADVISED THAT A PUBLIC FARING WILL BE REQUESTED FOR THE SECOND MEETING IN JANUARY. (5) ASKED FOR UPDATE ON RECORDED MESSAGE SYSTEM BECAUSE OF TELEPHONE DIRECTORY DEADLINE. JMC ADVISED THAT STAFF SHOULD BE PREPARED TO MAKE A FINAL PROPOSAL ON PRICING AND SYSTEM BY END OF MONTH. (~ EXPRESSED HIS CONCERN ABOUT PAVING BACK CREEK FIRE STATION BEFORE COLD WEATHER ECH WILL WORK TO GET BETTER COSTS BY COMBI1~iING PAVING TO BE DONE. (7~ WATCHED CONSOLIDATION PROGRAM CONCERNING AFTERMATH, SUNDAY MORNING, CE[ANNEL 7, AND COMPLIlViENTED SAM ON HIS PERFORMANCE. SUPERVISOR MCGRAW: (1) REPORTED ON DISCUSSION WITH HOWARD MUSSER AT SUNDAY MORNING PROGRAM ABOUT COOPERATION BETWEEN ROANOKE COUNTY AND ROANOKE CITY FOR NEGOTIATING CABLE TV FRANCHISE, AND RECENT LETTER F SENT TO NIR. MUSSER (2) WII.L ASSUME PRESIDENCY OF VACO AT ANNUAL MEETING AT THE HOMESTEAD ON NOVEMBER 18 - 20. JAMES D. CAMPBELL WII.L BECOME EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF VACO DECEMBER 1, 1990. (3) COMII~NDED CITY OF ROANOKE FOR GAINING GENERAL ASSEMBLY APPROVAL TO ENACT ABIAS-BAN AND ASKED PMM TO DETERMINE WHAT ACTIONS WOULD BE NEEDED IF ROANOKE COUNTY SHOULD MAKE THE SAME REQUEST. PMM WILL REPORT BACK TO THE BOARD ON 12/04/90. (4) REQUESTED LOOI~NG AT MODIFIED WARD SYSTEM FOR RESTRICTIONS AS WELL AS GAIN. PMM SAID THIS COULD BE DONE UNDER THE COUNTY CHARTER WITHOUT SPECIFIC LEGISLATION. (5) WOULD LIKE TO SEE A JOINT EFFICIENCY STUDY OF DELIVERY OF SERVICES IN THE ROANOKE VALLEY WITHIN THE LOCAL GOVERNMENTS. io SUPERVISOR NICKENS: (1) REQUESTED RECONSIDERATION OF COOPERATION RESOLUTION BEFORE ~JOLf~tMENT AND WOULD LII~ TO INCLUDE BOTETOURT COUNTY. SUPERVISOR ROBERS: (1) SENATOR WARNER IS GOING TO HELP WITH FUNDING REQUEST IN SENATE FOR SMART HIGHWAY. (2) DR. WADE GILLEY, GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY, BELIEVES THAT THE ROANOKE VALLEY WILL BE ONE OF 100 SECONDARY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT HUBS OF THE NEXT TWENTY ~ AND SMART HIGHWAY COULD BE THE FOCUS PROJECT. (3) ASKED FOR UPDATE ON ACTIONS OF STAFF WITH ROANOKE CITY REGARDING AIRPORT CObIlVIISSION TO BE COMPOSED OF CITIZENS. BLJ SUGGESTED THIS BE FIRST ITEM FOR COOPERATION MEETING WITH ROANOKE CITY. SAM SUGGESTED THAT RWR WRITE LETTER TO MAYOR TAYLOR ABOUT CHANGING THE STRUCTURE OF AIRPORT COIVIlVIISSION. ECH AND STAFF WII.L DRAFT. L. CITIZENS' CO1I~IlVIENTS AND COINIlVIUNICATIONS NONE M. REPORTS HCN TO RECEIVE AND FILE REPORTS AFTER DISCUSSION OF ITEM 5 - UW 1. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance 2. General Fund Unappropriated Balance 3. Board Contingency Fund ii 4. Statement of income and expenses for the four months ended October 31, 1990 5. Report on CORTRAN/RADAR transportation. RICH BOEHLER, 3114C HONEYWOOD LANE, SPOKE STAFF DIRECTED TO BRING BACK REPORT FOR ACTION AT 12/04/90 MEETING N. EXECUTIVE SESSION pursuant to the Code of Virginia section 2.1-344 A NONE O. CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE SESSION NONE EVENING SESSION AT 7:00 P.M. P. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1190-1 Petition of Roanoke Moose Lodge #284 to obtain a Special Use Permit to operate a shooting range DARLENE HESS, 2882 CARVINS COVE ROAD, SALEM, PRESENTED PETITION SIGNED BY 150 CITIZENS OPPOSED PETITIONER WAS REQUESTED TO SET UP MEETING WITH CONCERNED CITIZENS SAM TO CONTINUE TO 12/18/90 URC WITH RWR ABSENT is Q. CITIZENS' COMII~NTS AND COMMiJNICATIONS 1. LELA E. BLEWETT, 958 HALIFAX CIRCLE, REQUESTED BOARD CHANGE THE ORDINANCE ALLOWING ONLY TWO DOGS PER HOUSEHOLD IN ROANOKE COUNTY 2. NiII~ VIIVYARD, IN SUPPORT OF MS. BLEWETT, INQUIRED WHY THERE WAS NO ORDINANCE CONCERNING CAT OWNERSHIP HCN ADVISED THAT IN THE FUTURE, CAT ORDINANCE SHOULD BE CONSIDERED. SAM SUGGESTED REVISITING THE ZONING ORDINANCE. LBE QUESTIONED WHY THE ORDINANCE WAS WRITTEN TO ALLOW ONLY TWO DOGS AND SUGGESTED DELAYING ENFORCEMENT PENDING RESEARCH BY STAFF. LBE MOTION THAT IN MATTER OF NUMBER OF DOGS ALLOWED UNDER THESE CIRCUMSTANCES, ENFORCEMENT OF THAT PARTICULAR ASPECT OF THE ZONING LAW BE DEFERRED UNTIL BOARD RECEIVES A REPORT FROM STAFF REGARDING THE APPROPRIATE NUMBER OF DOGS FOR HOUSEHOLD TO KEEP AND TAKE FORMAL ACTION LBE RESTATED THE MOTION THAT ENFORCEMENT OF THIS PARTICULAR CASE BE DEFERRED UNTIL THE STAFF REPORTS BACK TO THE BOARD ON ALL ASPECTS OF THE ISSUE OF THE NUMBER OF DOGS AND ZONING CLASSIFICATIONS AYES - LBE, HCN NAYS -SAM, BLJ ABSENT - RWR PMM ADVISED THAT TIE VOTE CARRIES THE DECISION OVER TO 12/04/90 13 R, ADJOURNMENT TO SUNDAY. NOVEMBER 18, 1990 AT THE HOMESTEAD FOR THE VIRGINIA ASSOCIATION OF COUNTIES ANNUAL CONFERENCE, MONDAY, NOVEMBER 26, 1990, AT 3 P.M. FOR A WORK SESSION WITH STAFF, AND TO 8:00 A.M. FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 30, 1990 AT THE SUNIVYBROOK INN FOR THE PURPOSE OF A BREAKFAST MEETING WITH AREA LEGISLATORS HCN MOTION TO ADJOURN AT 7:55 P.M. ADDING WORK SESSION ON NOVEMBER 26, 1990, AT 3 P.M. URC WITH RWR ABSENT 14 A N + ~~ ~u-~M~t~ cmr 2 ~ ~.-.~~~~~~1~ 18 ~ 88 /~ G~ Q~ +EtaU1CENTEMN~~~ ~ / ~ V ~ 9 Bc.r~~(ule~~~e~~R ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA NOVEMBER 13, 1990 Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meeting. Regular meetings are held on the second Tuesday and the fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public hearings are held at 7:00 p.m on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. THIS IS THE ONLY BOARD MEETING SCHEDULED FOR THE MONTH OF NOVEMBER DECEMBER MEETINGS WILL BE ON DECEMBER 4 AT 3:00 P.M. AND DECEMBER 18 AT 3:00 P.M. AND 7:00 P.M. A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.) 1. Roll Call. 2. Invocation: John M. Chambliss Assistant County Administrator 3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag. B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS C. PROCIAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS, AND AWARDS i 1. Resolution supporting continued regional cooperation in the Roanoke Valley. 2. Proclamation declaring the week of November 11 - 17, 1990 as American Education Week. 3. Introduction of new Executive Director of the Virginia Association of Counties D. NEW BUSINESS 1. Request for award of contract for water/sewer rate analysis. 2. Appropriation of funds for Allied Signal economic development prospect. 3. Annual Report from the Mental Health Services of the Roanoke Valley 4. Request for additional funds to complete Read Mountain Fire Station. 5. Appropriation of funds to extend the contract of Cable TV consultant O. D. Page, P.E. E. REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS F. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS G. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 2 1. Ordinance amending and reenacting Chapter 4, Amusements, Section 4-99, "Bingo Games and Raffles", of the Roanoke County Code, providing for an increase in the audit fee. 2. Ordinance amending and reenacting Chapter 21, Taxation of the Roanoke County Code to provide for a reduction in the amount of penalties for failure to file returns for Personal Property taxes. 3. Ordinance amending the Roanoke County Code by the addition of provisions regulating smoking for the County of Roanoke. 4. Ordinance to authorize acquisition of parcel of land adjacent to Bonsack Well No. 1. 5. Ordinance to authorize acquisition of parcel of land adjacent to Hidden Valley Well No. 9. 6. Ordinance authorizing abandonment and reconveyance of a well lot located on the north side of Burlington Drive in the Burlington Heights area of Roanoke County to Joseph N. and Grace M. Nackley. H. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance at the request of Roanoke Gas Company to share a County water line easement. I. APPOINTMENTS 1. Board of Zoning Appeals 2. Building Code Board of Adjustments and Appeals 3 3. Explore Citizens Advisory Committee 4. Grievance Panel 5. Library Board 6. Mental Health Services Community Services Board 7. Planning Commission 8. Recycling Advisory Committee j. CONSENT AGENDA ALT, MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WII.L BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY. 1. Approval of Minutes - October 23, 1990 2. Confirmation of Committee Appointments to the Explore Citizens Advisory Committee and the Recycling Advisory Committee. 3. Acceptance of water and sanitary sewer facilities serving Woodbridge Section 11. 4. Acceptance of water and sanitary sewer facilities serving Viking Court. 5. Acceptance of payment by ITT for reconstruction of sanitary sewer line. 4 6. Request for acceptance of Remington Road into the VDOT Secondary System. 7. Donation of drainage easements in connection with the Ingal Blvd. Project. K. REPORTS AND INQUIItIES OF BOARD MEMBERS L. CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS M. REPORTS 1. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance 2. General Fund Unappropriated Balance 3. Board Contingency Fund 4. Statement of income and expenses for the four months ended October 31, 1990 5. Report on CORTRAN/RADAR transportation. N. EXECUTIVE SESSION pursuant to the Code of Virginia section 2.1-344 A O. CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE SESSION EVENING SESSION (7:00 P.M.) P. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1190-1 Petition of Roanoke Moose Lodge #284 to obtain a Special Use Permit to operate a shooting range Q. CITIZENS' COMII~NTS AND COMMUNICATIONS R ADJOURNMENT TO SUNDAY, NOVEMBER 18, 1990 AT THE HOMESTFAD FOR THE VIItGINIA ASSOCIATION OF COUNTIES ANNUAL CONFERENCE, AND TO 8:00 A.M. FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 30, 1990 AT THE SUNNYBROOK INN FOR THE PURPOSE OF A BREAKFAST MEETING WITH AREA LEGISLATORS 6 ~1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SIIPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 13, 1990 RESOLUTION 111390-1 SUPPORTING CONTINUED REGIONAL COOPERATION IN THE ROANORE VALLEY WHEREAS, the referendum on the consolidation of the County and City of Roanoke was held on November 6, 1990; and WHEREAS, the proposed consolidation plan did not receive a majority of votes from the citizens of Roanoke County; and WHEREAS, the citizens of Roanoke County have made known their interest in and support of cooperative efforts with the neighboring jurisdictions in the Roanoke Valley; and WHEREAS, the people of the Roanoke Valley currently have various regional issues which must be resolved and regional projects which must be completed; and WHEREAS, the people of the Roanoke Valley will all benefit from continued cooperative efforts by the governing bodies of the five localities; and WHEREAS, it is in the best interest of the citizens of Roanoke County that the Board of Supervisors and County staff support and initiate joint projects and facilities with the other jurisdictions of the Roanoke Valley. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors does hereby formally adopt a resolution in support of regional cooperation and interjurisdictional problem- solving; and further, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors urges the r S governing bodies of the Cities of Salem and Roanoke, Town of Vinton and Botetourt County to join with them in making this commitment to the citizens of the Roanoke Valley, and further, BE IT RESOLVED that a copy of this resolution be transmitted to the respective clerks for the governing bodies of the City of Roanoke, City of Salem, Town of Vinton and County of Botetourt. On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt the resolution and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Brenda J. olton, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Mary F. Parker, Clerk, Roanoke City Council Forest Jones, Clerk, Salem City Council Carolyn S. Ross, Clerk, Town of Vinton John Williamson, Clerk, Botetourt County Board of Supervisors ~- / AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 13, 1990 RESOLUTION SUPPORTING CONTINUED REGIONAL COOPERATION IN THE ROANORE VALLEY WHEREAS, the referendum on the consolidation of the County and City of Roanoke was held on November 6, 1990; and WHEREAS, the proposed consolidation plan did not receive a majority of votes from the citizens of Roanoke County; and WHEREAS, the citizens of Roanoke County have made known their interest in and support of cooperative efforts with the neighboring jurisdictions in the Roanoke Valley; and WHEREAS, the people of the Roanoke Valley currently have various regional issues which must be resolved and regional projects which must be completed; and WHEREAS, the people of the Roanoke Valley will all benefit from continued cooperative efforts by the governing bodies of the four municipalities; and WHEREAS, it is in the best interest of the citizens of Roanoke County that the Board of Supervisors and County staff support and initiate joint projects and facilities with the other jurisdictions of the Roanoke Valley. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors does hereby formally adopt a resolution in support of regional cooperation and interjurisdictional problem- solving; and further, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors urges the { r ~ ~ / other governing bodies of the Cities of Salem and Roanoke and the Town of Vinton to join with them in making this commitment to the citizens of the Roanoke Valley. AT A RERG NIAM HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTYEADMINISTRATION CENTER COUNTY, VI ~ ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 13, 1990 RESOLUTION 111390-2 OF APPRECIATION TO ELMER C. HODGE ON HIS FIFTH ANNIVERSARY AS ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR WHEREAS, Elmer C. Hodge, Jr. has been County Administrator for Roanoke County since November, 1985; and WHEREAS, even before his official date of employment, he was in the County, directing clean up operations after the 1985 flood; and WHEREAS, Mr. Hodge has been responsible for a variety of projects which have been greatly beneficial to the people of Roanoke County and of the Valley as a whole; and WHEREAS, these projects include the Roanoke County Charter, the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission, the new Regional Landfill, curbside and automated recycling, County-wide garbage collection, and Spring Hollow Reservoir; and WHEREAS, during Mr. Hodge's administration, the County has received the All America City Award, four National Association of Counties Achievement Awards, and two Virginia Municipal League Achievement Awards. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors does hereby express its appreciation and gratitude to Elmer C. Hodge, Jr. on the occasion of his fifth anniversary serving as Roanoke County Administrator; and FURTHER, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors extends its best wishes and encouragement for Mr. Hodge's continued success and growth as the Administrator of the County of Roanoke. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES• Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Robers NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens A COPY TESTE: Brenda J. Ho on, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Resolutions of Appreciation Keith Cook, Director, Human Resources ACTION NO. A-111390-3 ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THERO~~D COUNTYEADMINISTRATION CENTER COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE MEETING DATE: November 13,1990 AGENDA ITEM: Request for Award of Contract for Water/Sewer Rate Analysis COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR' S COMMENTS : ,,,~,,.~ BACKGROUND' On June 12•,1990 Wheat First Securitie the S ring Hollowe Reservoir Supervisors a tentative timetable for p roceed with the Project. The Board directe erform the rate feasibility study, selection of a consultant to p ro riation based upon the and then return to the Board for an app P selected bid. Si7NlMARY OF INFORMATION The County received six proposals from professional ac Thesenfirms firms to perform the feasibility study. engineering Director were interviewed by a committee composed of Diane andtJim Johnson of Finance), Cliff Craig (Director of Utilities), (Financial Advisor/ Wheat, First Securities). firm of After careful review, staff recommends the engineering Burns & McDonnell. Staff req 1 for a water and sewer analysiso in contract with Burns & McDonnel est that the study be the amount of $60,000. Staff would sugg erformed on water and sewer sinctelmthe cost increment is minimal P if they are reviewed at the same can be completed in a ninety day period. This will still The study lace the sale of the bonds in fit within the timetable that woula ation for the bond sale, this April 1991. In addition to prep rates and analysis will review ter and nsew,er.eXBurns &pMcDonnell wil emfor connection fees for wa ro ect, expansion recommendations on a rate st Hollow Reservoir p bj a equa current operations, the Spring ear water and sewer of the sewage treatment plant, and the ten y sue. - / capital improvements plan. FISCAL IMPACT: This $60,000 needed for the analysis is available in the Utility Fund. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: the County staff to proceed with the Staff recommends authorizing to Burns & award of the water and sewer feasibility study McDonnell. Respectfully submitted, 1.C.arnx.~ Diane D. Hyatt G Director of Finance Approved by, Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ------ ---------------------- VOTE ------------ ACTION No Yes Abs Approved (x ) Motion by: APP halncT Eddy Denied ( ) Johnson Received ( ) McGraw Referred ( ) Nickens To Robers Bob L. Johnson motion for staff recommendation to award water and sewer feasibility study to Burns & McDonnell Lee B. Eddy substitute motion that study be limited to water and exclude sewage AYES - Supervisor Eddy NAYS - Supervisors McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers APPROVED Bob L. Johnson original motion staff recommenRobeors AYES - Supervisors McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, NAYS - Supervisor Eddy cc: File Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance Cliff Craig, Director, Utilities Reta Busher, Director, Management & Budget ACTION NO. A-111390-4 ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: November 13,1990 AGENDA ITEM: Appropriation of Funds for Allied Signal Disk Brake Facility COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND' On October 23, 1990, Allied Signal announced that they planned to construct a facility in western Roanoke County on the 159 acres currently owned by Salem-West Corporation. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The location of Allied Signal is being accomplished through the Industrial Development Authority of Roanoke County (IDA). Section 15.1-511.1 of the Code of Virginia states "The governing body of any county in this Commonwealth may give, lend or advance in any manner that to it may seem proper funds or other county property, not otherwise specifically allocated or obligated, to any authority created by such governing body pursuant to law." This is the authority for Roanoke County to donate funds to the IDA. In addition, Section 15.1-1378 (f) of the Code of Virginia gives the IDA power "to sell, exchange, donate and convey any or all of its facilities or properties whenever its board of directors shall find any such action to be in furtherance of the purposes for which the authority was organized. By using the authority of these Code sections, the County will donate money to the IDA. The IDA will then purchase the land from Salem-West Corporation and donate the land to Allied Signal. In addition, the County has agreed to construct water and sewer extensions and make road improvements. The County's commitment is as follows: Land Acauisition - The Board of Supervisors will donate up to $825,000 to the Roanoke County Industrial Development Authority for the purchase of approximately 159 acres. The ~' - Authority already has the site under option and will purchase the property. After purchase, the Authority will deed the property to the prospect at no cost. Water and Sewer Extensions - The County will be responsible for the design and construction of water and sewer extensions to serve the Salem-West property. These extensions are estimated to cost $700, 000 ($650, 000 for sewer and $50, 000 for water). Road Improvements - Roanoke County and the Virginia Department of Transportation are studying the design alternatives of Route 11/460 at the entrance to the property to improve turning movements and access to the site. The County will pay up to $50,000 of these road improvements. FISCAL IMPACT• The Board of Supervisors will need to appropriate $875,000 from the Unappropriated Balance for the land acquisition and road improvements. The $650,000 for the sewer extensions is available from unallocated bonds that were sold through the Virginia Resources Authority. The $50,000 for water extensions will need to be appropriated from the Water Offsite Facility revenues. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends appropriating the funds outlined in the Fiscal Impact Section to proceed with the location of Allied Signal. Respectfully submitted, (,~,~ ~ ~l C ti.a Diane D. Hyatt~~ Director of Finance Approved by, Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator -------- ------------------------ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs Approved (X ) Motion by: ~+o~~o., n nrt~r_r=*-~ moved Denied ( ) Gtaff rPr-nmmPnr7atinn Eddy .~{- Received ( ) Johnson ~ Referred ( ) McGraw ~_ To Nickens ~- Robers .~ cc: File Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance Reta Busher, Director, Management & Budget Tim Gubala, Director, Economic Development Phillip Henry, Director, Engineering Cliff Craig, Director, Utilities ACTION NO. ' ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: November 13, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: Annual Report from Mental Health Services of the Roanoke Valley COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION The Mental Health Services of the Roanoke Valley is required by their by-laws to present an annual report to all participating localities. Dr. Henry J. Sullivan, a County appointee, and Ms. Mary Faron, a County resident, will present a brief report about the services provided by Mental Health Services of the Roanoke Valley. l"' ~" Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ----------- --- -------------ACTION - VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Eddy Received ( ) Johnson Ref erred ( ) McGraw Nickens To ( ) Robers H S rv Chairman Daniel E. Karnes .~-„J November 1 , 1 990 Mr. Richard W. Robers Chairman Roanoke County Board of Supervisors PO Box 29800 Roanoke, Virginia 24018 Dear Mr. Robers: This is to request time Roanoke County Board Tuesday, November 13 at on the agenda of the of Supervisors on 3pm. u~~e-chairman Mr . Henry J . Su 11 ivan, Ph . D . , Menta 1 Health Thelma L. Stephens Services Board Member appointed by the Tr"asare. Roanoke County Board of Supervisors, will be John M. Hudgins, Jr. present to give a brief report about services sE-cretory provided to the citizens of Roanoke County by Rita J. Gliniecki Mental Health Services of the Roanoke Valley. Executive Director Fred P Roessel, Jr., Ph.D. Ms. Mary Faron, resident of Roanoke County, will also be present, and will give a brief report from a consumers point of view. Written materials describing our services in some detail are attached. Sincerely, ~~~. ~~~ F'ed P. Roessel, Jr , Ph.D. Executive Director cc: Henry J. Sullivan, Ph.D. Mary Faron MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES OF THE ROANOKE VALLEY EXECUTIVE OFFICES, 301 Elm Avenue, S. W., Roanoke, Virginia 24016-4026-(703) 345-9841 Serving the Counties of Botetourt, Craig and Roanoke and the Cities of Roanoke and Salem MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES OF THE ROANOKE VALLEY PROGRESS REPORT - FY90 COUNTY OF ROANUKE ~-3 DURING THE PAST FISCAL YEAR, $69,984 OF ROANOKE COUNTY'S TAX DOLLARS WERE MATCHED WITH STATE AND FEDERAL DOLLARS AND FEES TO PROVIDE $1,552,368 OF SERVICE TO ROANOKE COUNTY CITIZENS. THIS AMOUNTS TO $22 WORTH OF SERVICES FOR EACH ROANOKE COUNTY TAX DOLLAR EXPENDED. THE SERVICES PROVIDED DURING THE PAST YEAR INCLUDE MENTAL HEALTH, MENTAL RETARDATION, AND SUDSTANCE ABUSE PROGRAMS. THE MENTAL HEALTH DIVISION PROVIDES AN ARRAY OF SERVICES TO PERSONS WITH SERIOUS MENTAL ILLNESS, CHILDREN AND ADOLESCENTS; Ab'D THE MEDICALLY INDIGENT. DURING THE PAST YEAR 1,605 ROANOKE COUNTY RESIDENTS RECEIVED SERVICES THROUGH THIS DIVISION. THESE SERVICES TO CHILDREN, ADOLESCENTS AND THEIR FAMILIES AND ADULTS INCLUDED: o EM_ER_GE_NCY AN_D ONGOING_ OUTREACH_ - CRISIS INTERVENTION AND OUTREACH TO CONSUMERS OF MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES; INCLUDES INTENSIVE IN-HOME SERVICES, OUTREACH TO GERIATRIC ADULTS, HOMES FOR ADULTS, AND ADULT PROTECTIVE SERVICES o CASE _MANAGEM_EN_T_ AND OUTPATIENT - COMPREHENSIVE SERVICES: INCLUDES ASSESSMENT, INDIVIDUALIZED CASE PLANS; AND SPECIFIC SERVICES SUCH AS MEDICATION MANAGEMENT, PSYCHOTHERAPY AND ADVOCACY o C_R_ISIS INTERVENTION - 24-HOUR CRISIS INTERVENTION FOR PERSONS EXPERIEIvTCING EXTREME EMOTIONAL STRESS o PSYCHIATRIC EVALUATION AND FOLLOW UP - COMMUNITY PSYCHIATRISTS PRO`JIDE EVALUATION, MEDICATION, AND FOLLOW-UP SERVICES AND ARE INTEGRAL MEMBERS CF THE TREATMENT TEAMS o PSYCHOSOCIAL REHABILITATION', TEACHING LIVING SKILLS WHICH PROMOTE INDEPENDENCE, PEER SUPPORT, AND INTEGRATION Ii?TO THE GoMMtrN I TY o R_ESIDENTIA__L SERVICES - TREATMENT FOR SERIOUSLY EMOTIONALLY DISTURBED CHILDREN, AGES 7 - 12, IN A COMMUNITY SETTING; FULL SUPPORTING SERVICES TO ADULTS LIVING INDEPENDENTLY o PR_E_V_ENTION S_E_RVICES - TRAINING AND CONSULTATION WITH PROFESSIONALS IN NON-MENTP.L HEALTH SETTINGS, AS A METHOD FOk PREVENTING EMOTIONAL DISORDERS IN CHILDREN AND ADOLESCENTS; INCLUDES PARENTING EDL'CATTON, SOCIAL PRGBLEM-SOLVING SKILLS, AND FEER HELPING 1 .~ -3 o DA_Y TREP.TMENT - SERVICES PROVIDED DURING AND IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING TYPICAL SCHOOL HOURS FOR CHILDREN AND ADOLESCENTS, :!INCLUDES GROjJPS, IP~i?IVIDUAL AND FAMILY COt)NSELIP3G, PARENT EDUCATION AND SUPPORT, ADJtTNCTIVE THERAPIES AND ACADEMIC INSTRUCTION OF SPECIAL NOTE: - A UNIQUE PARTNERSHIP WITH YOUTH HAVE~1 I AND SANCTUARY CRISIS INTERVENTION CENTER TO PURCHA>E LOCAL CRISIS STABILIZATION BEDS, USING STATE FACILITY FUNDS, FOR ADOLESCENTS AT RISK OF STATE HOSPITALIZATION. A CHILD AND ADOLESCENT PRESCRIPTION TEAM WHICH ASSESSES AND FLRNS FOR AT-RISK YOt~TH AND THEIR FAMILIES, AS WELL AS CREATES ACCESS TO STATE FUNDS TO DE`JELOP SPECIAL SERVICES ON BEHALF OF I PdD I V I DUAL Ci OUTH . THE MENTAL RETARDATION DIVISION PROVIDES A COMPREHENSIVE SYSTEM OF QUALITY COMMUNITY SUPPORT SERVICES THAT ARE RESPONSIVE TO PERSONS WTTH MENTAL RETARDATION, THEIR FAMILIES, AND THE COMMUNITY. DURING THE PAST 'FEAR WE PROVIDED SERVICES TO 274 CITIZENS OF ROANOKE COUNTY. THESE SERVICES INCLUDED: o EMERG_E_NCY_ SERVICES AVAILABLE 24 HOURS PER DAY, SEVEN DAYS PER WEEK, PROVIDING CRISIS INTERVENTION, :STABILIZATION, AND REFERRAL ASSISTANCE FACE-TO-FACE OR BY TELEPHONE OF ANU o CASE MANAGEMENT SERVICES TO ASSURE IDENTIFICATIO~~ OUTREACH TO POTENTIAL CLIENTS; PROVIDE CONTINUITY OF CARE B` ASSESSTNG, PLANNING i~'ITH, LINKING, MONITORING, AND ADVOCATING FOR CLIENTS IN RESPONSE TO THEIR CHANGING NEEDS a DAY S°tTPPOF.T_SERVICES PROVIDING PROGRAMS INCLUDING SHELTERED AND SUPPORTED EMPLOYMENT, ADULT DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES, AND EDUCATION/RECREATION o RESID_E_NT_IAL_ SERVICES PROVIDING OVERNIGHT CARE IN CONJUNCTION WITH AN INTENSIVE TIkEATMENT OR TRAINING PROGRAM (I.E., INTERMEDIATE CARE FACILITY OR GROUP HOME:! OR SUPPORTIVE SERVICES TO ASSIST CLIENTS IN LOCATITdG OR MAINTAINING RESIDENTIAL SETTINGS (T.E., RESPITE SERVICES) o EARLY__~NTERVENTION SERVICES PROVIDING EDUCATION AND TRAINING TO DEVELOPMENTALLY DELAYED INFANTS (0 - 2 YEARS OF AGE) AND THEIR PARENTIS IN ORDER TO P,EDUCE THE HANDICAPPING CONDITION 2 ,~ - OF SPECIAL NOTE ARE TWO SPECIALIZED DAY SUPPORT PROGRAMS FUPdDED AT ARC-ROANOKE/CHD INDUSTRIES AND TINKER MOUNTAIN INDUSTRIES AS PART OF FY"9U NEW INITIATIVE FUI'dDING. FIVE ADULTS WITH MENTAL RETARDATION APdD SEVERE PHYSICAL DISABILITIES WERE SERVED IN THE SPECIALIZED DAY SUPPORT PROGRAM AT ARC-ROANOKE/CHD INDUSTRIES. TINKER MOUNTAIN INDUSTRIES PROVIDED DAY SUPPORT SERVICES TO 19 ADULTS WITH MENTAL RETARDATION AND EMOTIONAL PRO~:LEMS THF'T HP.D PREVENTED THEIR PLACEMENT IN EXISTING DAY SUPPORT FROGRAMS. ALSO, TWO ADDITIONAL CASE MANAGERS WERE HIRED AT T"riE COUNSELING AND LIFE SKILLS CENTER WITH ?~dEW INITIATIVE FUNDING WITH lUU NEW CASES BEING OPENED THIS YEAR. THIRTY-GP1E NEW FAMILIES WERE REGISTERED FOR RESPITE SERVICES THROUGH THE SHORT-TERM CARE PROGRAM FOR FY'90. THE DIVISION OF SUBSTANCE ABUSE SERVICES PROVIDES SERVICES TO PREVENT THE DEVELOPMENT OF SUBSTANCE ABUSE AND TO FROMOTE THE RECOVERY CF INDIVIDUALS 4v'ITH ALCOHOL AND OTHEF~ Dp.UG ADDICTIONS OR DEPENDENCIES. IN THE FAST YEAR, 379 CITIZENS OF ROANOKE COUNTY RECEIVED PREVENTION, EARLY INTERVENTION, COUNSELING, DETOXIFICATION, OR RESIDENTIAL SERVICES FOR ADDICTIGN OR OTHER SUBSTANCE ABUSE PROBLEMS. THESE SERVICES INCLUDED: o OUTPATIENT SERVICES - PROVIDING COMPREHENSIVE SEFVICES FAMILIES TO DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENT PERSONS o MEDICP~SOCIAL COMMUNITY-BASED SUPERVISIGN FOR TREATMENT AND THEIR DETOXIFICATION - PROVIDING A TEN-BED, DETOXIFTCATION PROGRAM UNDER T?EDICAL PERSONS WITH ALCOHOL AND OTHER DRUG PROBLEMS o PRIMARY _C ARE .SERVICES - PRIMARY CARE UNIT, A SHORT ALCOHOLJDRUG EDUCATION APdD A INTENSIVE TREATMENT SETTING, AFTERCARE SERVICE TERM RESIDENTIAL FROGRAM OF TRANSITION EITHER TO A MORE OR TO THE COMMUNITY LiITH MULTI-LO__DGE, A SIXTEEN BED THERAPEUTIC COMMUNITY ENVIRONMENT PROVIDING INDIVIDUAL AND GROUP COUNSELING AS WELL AS CASE MANAGEMENT FOR UP TO SIXTEEN WEEKS o HEGIRA HOUSE - PRCVIDIN.~ A THERAPEUTIC COMMUNITY TREATMENT PROGRAM FOR ADULTS WITH SEVERE SUBSTANCE ABUSE PROBLEMS o SUPPORTED LIVING ARRANGEMENTS - F'F.OVIDING A DRUG AND ALCOHOL-FREE ENVIRONMEPdT TO FACILITATE A TRANSITION BACK THE COMMUNITY FROM HEGIRA AND MULTI-LGDGE 0 .~ -3 c, rREVETITION~EARLY ITdTERVENTIOT? -- PROMOTING A COMMUNITY NOTO c.:n' NON-TOLERANCE GF ALCOHOL AND OTHER DRUG ABUSE, INCREASE AWARENESS OF DRUG AND ALCOHOL ABUSE, AND TO PROVIDE PF.OGRAMMING TG DETER FIRST USE AND DEVELOPMENT OF ABUSE PATTE ~zT3S OF SPECIAL 1NTEJ3.EST, NEW FEDERAL BLGCK GRANT FUNDS PROVIDED A POSITION DEDICATED TO JAIL-BASED ASSESSMENT, REFERRAL AND TREATMENT SERVICES IMPLEMENTED IN CONJUNCTION 4~'ITH LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICIALS IN ROANOKE COUNTY. AS ADDIEDIOFORAAVDAILABLEASUBSTANCEYABUSE'JSERVICE~OBINCREA6EREAFOR THE NE EVERY LOCALITY. ON THE ATTACHED CHART IS A MORE DETAILED BREAKDOWN GF OUR SEP~VICES TO THE RESIDENTS OF THE COUNTY DURING FISCAL YEP.R 1990. November 1°, 199G 4 ,~ -3 11/13/90 PAGE 5 MHSRV DIRECTLY FUNDED PROGRAMS FY-90 STATISTICS/JURISDICTION County of Roanoke Unduplicated Units of Value of Client Count Service Service ------------------------- ------------ ---- MENTAL HEALTH 327 2,968 hours 185,498 $ Counseling Case Management 126 3,965 hours $134,369 Clubhouse it 160 718 313 2 days hours $33,486 $70,805 Emergency Services ' 1 , 414. days $66,907 s Center Children In Home Services 10 1,383 hours $50,847 970 1,156 hors $18,549 Prevention Services 605 1 12,917 mixed $560,461 MH Subtotal , units MENTAL RETARDATION Counseling and Life Skills Center 113 1,809 hours 76,747 $ Family Support 23 3,151 hours $44,667 232 $93 Work Activities 31 10 4,410 1,641 days days , $57,113 Adult Development Supported Employment 4 667 hours $3,462 Read Road 5 1,825 days $121,753 Niagara Road 4 3 1,430 1,064 days days $118,835 $142,525 Hazelridge ICF/MR 1 274 days $53,100 Melrose MR/ED Residential Respite 3 43 days $25,942 Short Term Care 25 3,726 hours $12,806 809 $19 i Li 52 563 hours , ng v College for 274 605 20 mixed $769,991 MR Subtotal , units SUBSTANCE ABUSE New Directions 162 2,344 hours 95,008 $ Hegira House 9 1,118 days $46,801 Residential Alcoholism Program 11 803 days 60,450 $ Residential Relapse 6 232 hours $9,199 Prevention Prevention Plus 191 148 hours $10,458 SA Subtotal 379 4,645 mixed $221,916 units TOTAL 2,258 38,167 ----- mixed ------- $1,552,368 ------------ ------------ ------------ --- ------- - ------- units - FY-90 Local Share - - $69,984 Service/Local Dollar - - ACTION NO. A111390-5 ITEM NUMBER ____-~ AT A REGULAR MEETING E ROANOKE OUNTY ADMINISTRAT ON CENTERS COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT TH MEETING DATE: November 13, 1990 SUB_: Request for additional funds to complete construction of the Read Mountain Fire station. ,~ c~ COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR' S COMMMENTS :3 Jt~~-~~/~ ~~/p~~ r ~ ~? ~~~~1 f~(~ s/.J~G+~»~,.t .~~yr~l L','~`L~n. ./U't .iC~'!r~%rra.-y~w~II~~/ p'i"~^ r~ / ~/ BACKGROUND' Roanoke County entered into an agreemecou tiesBotTheuoperation to construct a fire station to serve both s stem with Roanoke of this facility will be on a cost sharing y County as the responsible jurisdiction for construcart of the 1985 funds for the construction of this statio the cost of construction bond referendum. Over the last five years, has increased beyond the amount of funds budgeted in the bond referendum. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: In 1985, the projected cost of a station in the Bonsack area of Roanoke County was estimated tation wasObegun0in 1989ethehscopeuof planning and design of the s the project had changed sack CreeknStation, whi h is a twossbtory designed similar to the B building with an unfinished een modifiedstolmeetTthedne ds of the Read Mountain station has b service area. The station is designed as a 6,500 squa meetingsroome floor building that includes: four apparatus bays, baths with showers, work shop, and exterior kitchen, bunk rooms, finishes and roof ditionalh requirementsnforla fireh hydrantlandea industrial park. Ad osal for drainage retention pond are incorporated into the prop construction. Due to these ek t tion.he cThe lowest bidlforgthe above that of the Back Cre project is $399,400.00. The architectural firm of Rogers Reynolds has prepared an estimate of projected costs as follows: Construction Costs $399,400 27,500 Architectural/Engineering Fees 3,195 Reimbursable Expenses 1,620 Soil Testing 43,171 10% Contingency The addition of these items brings the total project cost to $474,886.00. '" ++~-~ FISCAL IMPACT' The bond referendum provided $300,000.00 for the Read Mountain Station. The actual costs is estimated to bdesign d 6an0.add tional to construct this station as currently appropriation for $174,886.00 will be required. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff and the architect have evaluated the costs and recommends the appropriation of an additional $174,886,00 in accordance with submitted bids and esti eted•inAearlya1991 these funds should permit the project to be compl SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED: Mar W. Light Deputy Chief ACTION Cam-' /~~' Elmer C. Hodge, Jr. County Administrator VOTE A roved (~ Motion by: See Below No Yes Abs PP Eddy Denied ( ) Johnson Received ( ) McGraw Referred Nickens To Robers Bob L. Johnson moved staff recommendation Lee B. Eddy substitute motion to reduce contingency fund to 5a and $10,000 for paving Back Creek Fire Station AYES - Supervisor Eddy NAYS - Supervisors McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers Bob L. Johnson moved the main motion AYES - Supervisor Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS - None cc: File Tommy Fuqua, Chief, Fire & Rescue Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance Reta Busher, Director, Management & Budget ACTION NO. A-111390-6 ,~ - .~ ITEM NO. AT A REGULAR MEE LD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY RADMINISTRAT ON CENTER COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HE MEETING DATE: November 13, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: Appropriation of funds to extend contract of cable TV consultant, O. D. Page, P.E. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY' An appropriation of funds from the Board's Contingency Fund is necessary to authorize the payment of the consultant, O. D. Page, P.E., for continued services during the actual renegotiations for the cable television franchise renewal with Cox Cablevision. BACKGROUND' Mr. O.D. Page, P.E. was originally hired by the three jurisdictions--Roanoke City, Roanoke County and Vinton--to serve as their consultant in preparaticontra t neresponsibil t es teincluded franchise. His original assessment of the effe reement s development'sofpeaa news franchise current franchise ag ordinance and recommendations as to terms of the franchise agreement. Mr. Page has completed his obligaot ri ~ d by t e County of his original contract, and all funds app p for that contract have been expended. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Substantive negotiations with Cox Cable for the renewal of their franchise to provide cable television service in the Roanoke Valley are scheduled to commence on November 14, 1990. It is the recommendation of legal counsel for all three jurisdictions test of Page's technical expertise and experience in these typ negotiations are essential during thesfor the renewal process. Cox Page has helped develop the strategy Cable has significant technical expertiseo~~ staff at its Atlanta its local management and an extensive supp even headquarters. Local legal counsel for Cox Cable has alreextension clear indications that technical issues involving policies, an institutional loop and bi-directional capability, frequency band-width and system re-build specifications will have an important bearing upon.°Counsel bel eves itmto be important to renewal and franchise fee .~ -5 the ultimate success of these negotiations to have continued access to Mr. Page's technical expertise, experience and familiarity with the valley's cable television needs and opportunities. Mr. Page's services under this extension would also include attendance at the public hearings necessary for the ratification of the new franchise ordinance as well as assistance in revising his proposed documents to implement the negotiated agreement. FISCAL IMPACTS' Roanoke County would continue to be responsible for thirty- three percent (33~) of any extension to Mr. Page's contract as it was with the original one. It is only possib thea actual renewal estimate in very rough outline how lengthy negotiations with Cox Cable will prove to be. Mr. Page has submitted a "roXtension contract tRoanoke2County's share wo ld be amount of this e $6,800. The County, and the Cox Cable to reimburse expenses associated wit ALTERNATIVES' other jurisdictions, anticipate requiring it for these expenditures as part of the h renewal of the franchise agreement. 1. Appropriate $6,800 from the Board's Contingency Fund to pay for the estimated cost of Mr. O. D. Page's consulting services during the cable television franchise renewal negotiations. 2. Make no appropriation and conduct franchise renewal negotiations on the basis of information previously provided. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff supports Alternative I for the extension of the contract with O. D. Page, P. E. Respectfully submitted, ~w~: `vv~..'1rv~ Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney -~ Action Vote No Yes Abs on a wirrraw Eddy x Approved (x) Motion by Sy- Denied ( ) o a~ro~7° ~~aff r_P~Omm_Pnda ;on Johnson x Received ( ) Alternative #1 McGraw x Referred Nickens x Robers x to cc: File Paul Mahoney, County Attorney Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance Reta Busher, Director, Management & Budget ACTION NO. ITEM NO . L7 '" AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: November 13, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: ORDINANCE AMENDING AND REENACTING SECTION 4-99 "AUDIT OF REPORTS SAND RECORDS" OF ARATMIUS MENTS'B'INOF GAMES AND RAFFLES , OF CHAPTER 4, THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE, AND PROVIDING FOR AN INCREASE IN THE AUDIT FEE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR' S COMMENTS : ~,c.c o-~~~ ~`'°~ EXECUTIVE SUMMARY' The 1990 session of the Virginia General Assembly adopted Chapter 903 which amended Section 18.2-340.7. This amendment authorized an increase in the local audit fee from 1~ to 2~ of the gross receipts from bingo games. BACKGROUND' Over the past year the Board has taken action to establish fees for certain services. The Board has determined that it is in the public interest to increase certain user fees to recover a portion of the direct and indirect costs of providing certain services. The Board has also determined that it is equitable to ensure that oulde bear vad portion of the cost soft pro v di g mthose services sh services. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Section 4-99 of the County Code establishes a 1~ audit fee of the gross receipts which an organization reports on money received from bingo and instant bingo operations. State law directs that the audit fee be calculated upon the gross receipts which an organization reports and the interest income on money that the organization has received from bingo or instant bingo operations. The 1990 session of the Virginia General Assembly amended the authorizing legislation to allow local governments to increase the audit fee from 1~ to 2~ of the gross receipts and interest income. The audit fees for 1989 totaled $6436.55. ~ -/ The draft ordinance provides that all audit fees received shall be separately accounted for and shall be used only for purposes of auditing and regulating bingo games and raffles. The effective date of this draft ordinance is January 1, 1991. FISCAL IMPACTS' It is anticipated that the revenues generated by this ordinance will result in an additional $5,000.00 to $6,000.00 per calendar year. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Board favorably consider the adoption of the proposed ordinance. Respectfully submitted, ~,,~, `~tY~ . `yY\. Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney Action Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by Eddy Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers Vote No Yes Abs C-/ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 13, 1990 ORDINANCE AMENDING AND REENACTING SECTION 4-99 "AUDIT OF REPORTS AND RECORDS" OF ARTICLE V. "BINGO GAMES AND RAFFLES," OF CHAPTER 4, "AMUSEMENTS," OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE, AND PROVIDING FOR AN INCREASE IN THE AUDIT FEE WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on November 13, 1990; the second reading and public hearing were held on December 4, 1990; and WHEREAS, the Board has taken action to authorize the establishment of fees for certain services, and further, the Board has determined that it is in the public interest to increase certain user fees, in order to recover a portion of the direct and indirect costs of providing certain services as provided herein; and, WHEREAS, the Board has found that it is both equitable and efficient to ensure that those individuals who benefit from certain governmental services bear an appropriate portion of the cost thereof while reducing general service cost subsidies; and WHEREAS, Section 18.2-340.7 of the Code of Virginia, as amended by the 1990 session of the Virginia General Assembly (Chapter 903) authorized an increase in the local audit fee from 1$ (one percent) to 2~ (two percent) of the gross receipts which an organization reports and of the interest income on money that the organization received from bingo or instant bingo operations. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA: 1 C -/ 1. That Section 4- 9 of the Roanoke County Code is amended and reenacted as follows: (a) All reports filed pursuant to this article shall be audited by the commissioner of revenue. The commissioner of revenue is hereby authorized to charge a minimum audit fee of twenty-five dollars ($25.00) and a maximum audit fee of two percent of (i) the gross receipts which an organization reports pursuant to this article; and (ii) interest income on money that the organization has received from bingo or instant bincto operations. Such audit fee shall be payable by the organization to the commissioner of revenue and such amount charged by the commissioner shall represent the amount of time and other services expended by the commissioner on the audit. All audit fees received shall be separately accounted for and shall be used only for the purposes of auditing and regulating bingo dames and raffles. (b) The provisions of this section shall not be construed so as to prohibit the commissioner of revenue or any official designated by the board of supervisors from performing unannounced audits or restrict any right of the commissioner or such official to secure records required to be maintained by the provisions of this article. 2. That the provisions of this ordinance shall be in full 2 ~a-/ force and effect for all permits issued from and after January 1, 1991. ACTION NO. ITEM NO. " ~' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: November 13, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: ORDINANCE AMENDINGN DUEEAND PAYABLE'2'1 AND §"21- TURNS § 21-17, 18, "PENALTY AND INTEREST ON DELINQUENCIES" OF ARTICLE II, TAXES ON TANGIBLE PERSONAL PROPERTY OF CHAPTER 21, TAXATION OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE, TO PROVIDE FOR A REDUCTION IN THE AMOUNT OF THE PENAL- TY IMPOSED FOR THE FAILURE TO FILE RETURNS FOR TANGIBLE PERSONAL PROPERTY AND FOR THE FAILURE TO PAY ANY TANGIBLE PERSONAL PROPERTY TAX WHEN DUE, TO CLARIFY DUE DATES FOR PAYMENT, AND TO PROVIDE FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: r EXECUTIVE SUMMARY' This amendment to the County Code eliminates the $10.00 minimum penalty for failure to file returns and failure to pay taxes on tangible personal property. BACKGROUND' Ordinance No. 11-11-86-228 was adopted approximately four years ago to implement the authority to prorate tangible personal property taxes. This authority is found in Section 58.1-3516 of the State Code. Section 58.1-3916 authorizes localities to provide by ordinance for penalties and interest for failure to pay local taxes when due, and penalties for failure to file a local tax return. No penalty for failure to file a return shall be greater than 10~ of the tax assessable on such return or ten dollars, whichever is greater; provided, however, that the penalty shall in no case exceed the amount of the tax assessable. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The county ordinance currently provides that the penalty for failure to file a return or failure to pay the tax when due is 10~ of the tax due or $10.00, whichever is greater; provided, however, that the penalty shall not exceed the amount of tax assessable. -- .~ The proposed ordinance eliminates the minimum $10.00 penalty. The proposed ordinance imposes a penalty of 10~ of the tax due. This amendment will reduce the penalty imposed in those situations where the taxable value of the tangible personal property is less than $100.00. In addition, the proposed ordinance clarifies the due date for taxes on tangible personal property. FISCAL IMPACTS' It is estimated that this proposed amendment would result in a $15,000 reduction in revenue received from penalties imposed. Penalty revenue is not included in the budget so no adjustment is necessary. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Board favorably consider the approval of the first reading of the attached ordinance. Respectfully submitted, Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney Action vote No Yes Abs Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by Eddy Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers G --~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 13, 1990 ORDINANCE AMENDING AND REENACTING § 21-16, "RETURNS"; § 21-17, "WHEN DUE AND PAYABLE"; AND § 21-18, "PENALTY AND INTEREST ON DELINQUENCIES" OF ARTICLE II, TAXES ON TANGIBLE PERSONAL PROPERTY OF CHAPTER 21, TAXATION OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE, TO~PROVIDE FOR A REDUCTION IN THE AMOUNT OF THE PENALTY IMPOSED FOR THE FAILURE TO FILE RETURNS FOR TANGIBLE PERSONAL PROPERTY AND FOR THE FAILURE TO PAY ANY TANGIBLE PERSONAL PROPERTY TAX WHEN DUE, TO CLARIFY DUE DATES FOR PAYMENT, AND TO PROVIDE FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE WHEREAS, Section 58.1-3516 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, authorizes the proration of personal property taxes by certain localities; and WHEREAS, by Ordinance No. 11-11-86-228, adopted on November 11, 1986, the Board of Supervisors provided for the proration of personal property taxes in Roanoke County; and WHEREAS, Section 58.1-3916 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, authorizes localities to provide for penalties and interest for failure to pay local taxes when due and penalties for failure to file a local tax return; and WHEREAS, it is the desire of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County to impose a penalty for failure to file returns and failure to pay taxes on tangible personal property; and WHEREAS, the first reading and public hearing of this ordinance was held on November 13, 1990; the second reading was held on December 4, 1990. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1 .~,~ -~ 1. That Article II. Taxes on Tanaible Personal Property of Chapter 21. Taxation be amended and reenacted to read and provide as follows: ARTICLE II. TAXES ON TANGIBLE PERSONAL PROPERTY Sec. 21-16. Returns. (a) Returns for tangible personal property, (except tangible personal property on motor vehicles, trailers and boats) tangible personal property employed in a trade or business and machinery and tools taxes shall be filed with the commissioner of the revenue on or before February 1 of the year for which the tax is to be assessed. Any person who shall fail to file such a return on or before February 1 of the year for which the tax is to be assessed shall, in addition to the tax to be paid, be assessed a penalty of ten (10) percent of the tax due (b) Returns of tangible personal property on motor vehicles, trailers and boats with a situs within the County on January 1 shall be filed with the commissioner of the revenue on or before February 1, returns of tangible personal property on motor ve- hicles, trailers and boats which acquires a situs within the County or which has its title transferred after January 1 shall be filed within thirty (30) days of the date on which situs is acquired or title transferred, of the year for which the tax is to be assessed shall, in addition to the tax to be paid, be assessed a penalty of ten (10) percent of the tax due 2 ~-z sec. 21-17. When due and payable. (a) County taxes on tangible personal property (except tangible personal property on motor vehicles, trailers and boats) tangible personal property employed in a trade or business and machinery and tools for each year shall be due from and after January 1 and payable on or before May 31 during the year for which the same are assessed. (b) There shall be a personal property tax at a rate estab- lished each year by the board of supervisors on motor vehicles, trailers and boats (hereafter referred to in this section as "taxable property") which have a situs within the county on January 1 of each year and which acquire a situs within the county on or after January 2 of each year. When taxable property acquires a situs within the county on or after January 2, the personal property tax for that year shall be assessed to the owner prorated on a monthly basis for the portion of the tax year during which the taxable property has situs within the county. When taxable property with a situs in the county is transferred to a new owner within the county, the personal property tax shall be assessed to the new owner prorated on a monthly basis for the portion of the tax year during which the new owner owns the taxable property. For purposes of proration, a period of more than one-half of a month shall be counted as a full month and a period of less than one-half of a month shall not be counted. For purposes of proration, the 3 C7 -2 first through the fifteenth will be considered as the first half of the month, and the sixteenth to the end of the month will be considered the second half of the month. (c) When any taxable property loses its situs within the county after the tax day or after the day on which it acquires a situs or its title is transferred to a new owner, the taxpayer shall from that time be relieved from personal property tax on such tangible property and receive a credit toward taxable property newly transferred to the taxpayer, or a credit against personal property taxes outstanding against the taxpayer, or a refund of personal property tax already paid on a monthly prorated basis, upon application to the commissioner of the revenue, provided that application is made within three years from the last day of the tax year during which the taxable property lost situs or had its title transferred. The commissioner of the revenue shall make a reason- able effort to ascertain and notify any taxpayer entitled to a prorated refund of personal property taxes pursuant to this subsection. Relief from the assessment of any personal property tax based upon loss of situs or acquisition of situs shall be based upon the property being legally assessed by another jurisdiction and such tax on the assessed property being paid. (d) County taxes on taxable property (tancible personal property on motor vehicles, trailers and boats which has a situs within the count on Januar 1 of each ear shall be due and payable from and after January 1 and payable on or before May 31 durin the ear for which the same are assessed. 4 ~~~ ~{-e~}- When any person, after January 1 or situs date, acquires a motor vehicle or trailer with a county situs, the tax shall be assessed on such taxable property for the portion of the tax year during which the new owner owns the taxable property and it has a situs in the county. The tax shall be due and owing within thirty (30) days after presentation or mailing of the bill from the treasurer, or May 31 of the tax year, whichever shall occur later. ~_fe-} An exemption from this tax and any interest or penal- ties arising therefrom shall be granted for any tax share or portion thereof during which the property was legally assessed by another jurisdiction and that such tax on the assessed property was paid. Sec. 21-18. Penalty and interest on delinquencies. (a) Any person who shall fail to pay any tangible personal property tax when the same is due shall be assessed and shall pay, along with such tax, a penalty of ten (10) percent of the amount of such unpaid tax } ~ ~.~~. a..,, (b) In the event any tax on tangible personal property is not paid on or before the date the same is due, interest at the rate of ten (10) percent per annum, commencing July 1 or the first day of the month after the due date, whichever is later, of the year for which such tax was assessed, shall be assessed and collected on the principal of and penalties on such tax; provided, however, that, 5 ~-2 for the second and subsequent years of delinquency, such interest shall be at the rate established pursuant to Section 6621 of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1954, as amended. 2. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after January 1, 1991. 6 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. ~ -~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: November 13, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: ADDIT ONE OFM PROVISIONS REGULATING SMORINGE FOR THE COUNTY OF ROANORE, VIRGINIA COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY' This proposed ordinance adopts the mandatory and optional provisions of the Virginia Indoor Clean Air Act. BACKGROUND' The 1990 session of the Virginia General Assembly adopted the Virginia Indoor Clean Air Act. This Act authorizes certain optional provisions for local ordinances. The proposed ordinance adopts the mandatory and optional provisions of the Act. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: This proposed ordinance is adopted in accordance with the provisions of the Virginia Indoor Clean Air Act. Sections 3-4, 3- 5, 3-8, 3-10, and 3-13 are the mandatory provisions. Sections 3-6, 3-7, 3-9, and 3-11 are the optional provisions. The office of the Commonwealth's Attorney has indicated that it will prosefu thisolordi ance tcouldr result • in alo$25100 ocivil provisions o penalty. FISCAL IMPACTS' Unknown. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Board favorably consider the approval of the first reading of this ordinance. Respectfully submitted, ~ `~ ~~~~ Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney Action Vote No Yes Abs A roved ( ) Motion by PP Eddy Johnson Denied ( ) McGraw Received ( ) Nickens Referred Robers to AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BO OANOKESCOUNTYSADMINISTRATION COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE R CENTER, TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 13, 1990 ORDINANCE AMENDING THS ROANORE COUNDE CODE BY THE ADDITION OF PROVISIONS REGIII,ATING SMOKING FOR THE COIINTY OF ROANORE, VIRGINIA WHEREAS, the adoption of this ordinance is authorized pursuant to the provisions of Sections 15.1-510 and 15.1-839, Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended; and WHEREAS, the 1990 General Assembly for the Commonwealth of Virginia adopted Sections 15.1-291.1 through 15.1-291.11 of the Code of Virginia, to require the Commonwealth and every county, city and town to establish reasonable no smoking areas in its buildings, considering the nature of the use and size of the building; and granting every county, city, and town the authority to regulate smoking according to the guidelines provided by Sections 15.1-291.1 through 15.1-291.11, commonly known as the Virginia Indoor Clean Air Act. WHEREAS, the first reading and public hearing of this ordinance was held on November 13, 1990; and the second reading was held on December 4, 1990. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That a new Article II, "Roanoke County Smoking Policy" of Chapter 3, "Air Pollution" of the Roanoke County Code is adopted and enacted as follows: 1 ~-~ ARTICLE II. ROANORE COUNTY SMOKING POLICY Sec. 3-3. Definitions. As used in this Article unless the context requires a different meaning: "Bar or lounge area" means any establishment or portion of an establishment where one can consume alcoholic beverages and hors d'oeuvres, but excluding any such establishment or portion of the establishment having tables or seating facilities where, in consideration of payment, meals are served. "Educational facility" means any building used for instruction of enrolled students, including, but not limited to, any day-care center, nursery school, public or private school, college, university, medical school, law school, or vocational school. "Health care facility" means any institution, place, building, or agency, required to be licensed under Virginia law, including, but not limited to, any hospital, nursing home, boarding home, adult home, supervised living facility, or ambulatory medical and surgical center. "Person" means any person, firm, partnership, association, corporation, company, or organization of any kind. "Private work place" means any office work area which is not open to the public in the normal course of business except by individual invitation. "Proprietor" means the owner or lessee of the public place, who ultimately controls the activities within the public place. The term "proprietor" includes corporations, associations, or 2 partnerships as well as individuals. "Public conveyance" or "public vehicle" means any air, land, or water vehicle used for the mass transportation of persons in intrastate travel for compensation, including, but not limited to, any airplane, train, bus, or boat that is not subject to federal smoking regulations. "public place" means any enclosed, indoor area used by the general public, including, but not limited to, any building owned or leased by the Commonwealth or any agency thereof of any county, city, or town, public conveyance or public vehicle, restaurant, education facility, hospital, nursing home, other health care facility, library, retail store of 15,000 square feet or more, auditorium, arena, theatre, museum, concert hall, or other area used for a performance or an exhibit of the arts or sciences, or any meeting room. "Restaurant" means any building, structure, or area, excluding a bar or lounge area as defined in this chapter, having a seating capacity of fifty or more patrons, where food is available for eating on the premises in consideration of payment. "smoke" or "smoking" means the carrying or holding of any lighted pipe, cigar, or cigarette of any kind, or any other lighted smoking equipment, or the lighting, inhaling, or exhaling of smoke from a pipe, cigar, or cigarette of any kind. "Theatre" means any indoor facility or auditorium, open to the public, which is primarily used for the purpose of exhibiting any motion picture, stage production, musical recital, dance, lecture, 3 or other similar performance. '~°~ Sec. 3-4. County Buildings. The County of Roanoke shall provide reasonable no-smoking areas, considering the nature of the use and the size of the building, in any building owned or leased by the County of Roanoke or any agency thereof. Sec. 3-5. Smoking Prohibited. It shall be unlawful for any person to smoke in any of the following places: 1. Elevators, regardless of capacity; 2. Common areas in an educational facility, including, but not limited to, classrooms, libraries, hallways, auditoriums, and public meeting rooms; 3. Any part of a restaurant designated as a"no-smoking" area pursuant to the provisions of this article; 4. Indoor service lines and cashier areas; and 5. School buses and public conveyances. Sec. 3-6. Regulations Reasonable No-Smoking Areas Designated. (A) The proprietors or person who manages or otherwise controls any building, structure, space, place, or area governed by this Article shall designate reasonable no-smoking areas, considering the nature of the use and size of the building, in the following places: 1. Retail and service establishments of 15,000 square feet or more serving the general public, including, but not limited to, department stores, grocery stores, drug 4 ~~ stores, clothing stores, and shoe stores; 2. Rooms in which a public meeting or hearing is being held; 3. Places of entertainment and cultural facilities, including, but not limited to, theaters, concert halls, gymnasiums, auditoriums, other enclosed arenas, art galleries, libraries, and museums; 4. Indoor facilities used for recreational purposes; and 5. Other public places. (B) Smoking areas designated pursuant to Sec. 3-6 (A) shall be subject to the following conditions: 1. Designated smoking areas shall not encompass so much of the building, structure, space, place, or area open to the general public that reasonable no-smoking areas, considering the nature of the use and the size of the building, are not provided; 2. Designated smoking areas shall be separate to the extent reasonably practicable from those rooms or areas entered by the public in the normal use of the particular business or institution; and 3. In designated smoking areas, ventilation systems and existing physical barriers shall be used to minimize the permeation of smoke into no-smoking areas. However, this Article shall not be construed as requiring physical modifications or alterations to any structure. Sec. 3-7. Regulation of Smoking--Restaurants. (A) Any restaurant having a seating capacity of fifty or more 5 ~'~ persons shall have a designated no-smoking area sufficient to meet customer demand. (B) In determining the extent of the no-smoking area, the following shall not be included as seating capacity: 1. Seats in any bar or lounge area of a restaurant, and 2. Seats in any separate room or section of a reataurant which is used exclusively for private functions. Sec. 3-8. Exemptions. p,. Provisions of this Article shall not be construed to regulate smoking in the following areas: 1. Bars and lounge areas; 2. Retail tobacco stores; 3. Restaurants, conference or meeting rooms, and public and private assembly rooms while these places are being used for private functions; 4 . Office or work areas which are not entered by the general public in the normal course of business or use of the premises; 5. Areas of enclosed shopping centers or malls that are external to the retail stores therein, are used by customers as a route of travel from one store to another, and consist primarily of walkways and seating arrangements; and 6. Lobby areas of hotels, motels, and other establishments open to the public for overnight accommodation. B. The provisions of this Article shall not be applicable 6 ~~~ within the limits of the Town of Vinton. Sec. 3-9. Private Emvloyer--Self Rectulation. Employers may regulate smoking in the private work place as they deem appropriate under the following circumstances: (A) if the designation of the smoking and no-smoking areas is the subject of a written agreement between the employer and his employees, the provisions of the written agreement shall control such designation; and (B) a total ban on smoking in any work place shall only be enforced by the employer upon the affirmative vote of the majority of the affected employees voting, unless such ban is the subject of a contract of employment between the employer and the employees as a prior condition of employment. The provisions of this Article shall not be construed to affect no-smoking policies established by employers prior to the adoption of this Article. Sec. 3-10. Posting Rectuirements. Any person who owns, manages, or otherwise controls any building or area in which smoking is regulated by this Article shall post signs stating "Smoking Permitted" or "No Smoking," and in restaurants, signs conspicuous to ordinary public view at or near each public entrance stating "No-Smoking Section Available." Sec. 3-11. Penalties. A person who violates any provision of this Article may be subject to a civil penalty of not more than twenty five dollars 7 `-~ `~ ($25) . No person shall smoke in a designated no-smoking area. Any person who continues to smoke in such area after being asked to refrain from smoking may be subject to a civil penalty of not more than twenty five dollars ($25). Sec. 3-12. Enforcement. The provisions of this Article shall be enforced by any department of the County duly designated by the County Administrator. Sec. 3-13. Construction. This Article shall not be construed to permit smoking where it is otherwise prohibited or restricted by other applicable provisions of the law. Sec. 3-14. Severability. The sections, paragraphs, sentences, clauses and phrases of this Article are severable, and if any phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph, or section of this Article shall be declared unconstitutional or invalid by the valid judgement or decree of a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs, and sections of this chapter shall remain valid. 2. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after January 1, 1991. 8 ACTION # ITEM NUMBER V '~ AT A VIRG NIA HELDNAT THEHROANOKE oOUNTYEADMINISTRATION CENTER COUNTY, MEETING DATE: November 13, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING ACQUISITION OF PARCEL OF LAND ADJACENT TO BONSACK WELL NO. 1 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~~( BACKGROUND' In 1988 Bonsack Well No. 1 was drilled in east County just off Carson Road on a parcel of land owned by the County. Upon survey of the lot after construction of the well (see copy attached), it was determined that we did not have the required 50 foot isolation distance from the well to the east property line. In order for the well to be permitted by the State Health Department, it is necessary to acquire additional land in order to have the required 50 foot isolation. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Staff has negotiated the purchase of the parcel of land containing 225 squareatedtcost fore the purchaseo of tt is naddit onal hlandris The negoti not to exceed $125.00. ALTERNATIVES AND IMPACTS: Funds are available from a current well drilling fund to purchase this land. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board conduct the first reading of the ordinance authorizing the purchase of this land, and schedule the the second reading of the ordinance for December 4, 1990. ~~ y SUBMITTED BY: Cliffor aig, P.E. Utility Director Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to ACTION Motion by: APPROVED: C%~ ~~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator Eddy Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers VOTE No Yes Abs ~~~ o. v o' '~~.s 0~ ,QOAO ~ `.`'s C~+R~ Q~E N' 75e ,5E ~' ~A • _ ¢/ 129 ~ 3 ~ S/ Arse ~~9.9'~~ Ia=P~.r ~ f 3d ~~o i~ 1 - - v~'' ~ ~'1s1 O ~ 1 ~ B ~'~~e .. ~.~.i bN oao/.P,~E3S.as CKeE~~ "' I ~ ~ ~ ~ I W L~ -- ~ ~Pu I O ~ `y --- h ~ i El~~. ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ h V y ~ ~ ~ W ~~ ~ .°r e I ~~ ~ ~ 3 ! I W 2 Ja~~e I V I + Q ~ ~ ti ~ 0.443 AC. O,e/~- j ~ ~ ~ ~ f O.000 AC. ~' ~l~/P I 5 Z~00 ~ E ~ °~ ~ o. s49 Ac. Jo~ic I ~ L _ ~ ~~' 0 k 4 v ~ n r ~ !-0/"~ ~ Q ~ /-ELL ~ S /i I ~ ~ u \ Soo ACAS/arG ; ~ ~'•~ u ~ ~ 4 ~ I I p~,..rP ~ O i i t!a/~E h ti~ i~ 1q ~v ~ ZJ o0.44' I ~ S ti ti !~ gyp, I I /. P/N JJ 1!~ /OL7.L7Q O ..~- 1J' ZJ's4 " W ~ J v h71 ~~ LEGAL REFE,PE~CE: °ii~ D. /g• /tBS Pte. /Stl APPRO/ED AGI,{I, "RO-1 A/O~t C04~IJ/' PL A,YI/l.VG COMM. DA,E Thy ~~R~Er FO,P ` NE l~OA,QD OF SUPE~QV/,50Q5' OF /PORNO E CE1TIfICAtE IM. OF A O. 4f9 AC,eE TQAC J A~/D A ~ ~ 5JQ/P ~0. OOG AC.~ /3E/~/ CO,t//E~'EO /9~' MAR' it . CNAM/3ER5 ~ ~ 9~.xy~ ~~ P, ~ 1QOA ti(OKE COUn/J~', Y/RG/~I/i1 0 LANO `~ ,SCR E /"'30 ~ A,/. /e / 0 By: ,r,.~K e ~~„-c~,~r,F,~o ~.wo s~,er~ ~/~.~ ~/~e o-ey/~r . ~ r-t4:TgS A*dA 601.'tiDS DESCRIPT'0\ S:?OW'i ON THIS PLAT REPRESENT A COi~OSITE OF DEEDS, ~Pl'.A?'S, A`iD CALCULATED ::~FO'Z.*IATIO:: ANJ DO tiOT Z?FLECT A\ ACCURATE BOUNDARY SURVEY. . ~ -,. ~"~ PROPERTY OF Cq\ SoN Rp . . RT ? de SHEET Na i-OF-Z_ SCALE : 1~=100 PLAT SHOWING PROPOSED TRACT BEING CONVEYED TO ROANOKE COUNTY BY MARY A. CHAMBERS Prepared 8y : Roanoke County Engineer~nq Department Oate: I-24-90 TAX MAP N0. 50.01-I-7 - -: r.I~7ES AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTION SkOWN ON THIS PLAT REPRESENT A COMPOSITE OF DEEDS, PLATS, AND CALCULATED INFORIrIATION AND DO NOT REFLECT AN ACCURATE BOUNDARY SURVEY. CARSp~(" RQ. RT. 758 '~-'1 `' '~ .._ .. 3 M N In M N N .~ N PROPERTY OF PROPERTY OF ROANOKE COUNTY MARY A. CHAMBERS Tax No.80.01•I-4 ~D.8.467, PG. 252 • S 27°2T~E 5.00' 3 • N M PROPOSED WELL ~~t PROPERTY TRACT ~N 27°27' W 5.00 o ~i N ,3 ~~ 0 N ~D N O SHEET No. 2-OF-2 TAX MAP NO. 50.01- I-7 2 SCALE: I"= 30' PLAT SHOWING PROPOSED TRACT BEING CONVEYED TO ROANOKE COUNTY BY MARY A. CHAMBERS PREPARED BY: ROANOKE COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT DATE: ~ - 24 - 4 0 ~~ / AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 13, 1990 ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE PURCHASE OF A PARCEL OF LAND ADJACENT TO BONSACK WELL NO. 1 LOCATED OFF CARSON ROAD IN ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA WHEREAS, in order to meet State Health Department requirements a fifty (50) foot isolation distance is required around any public well; and WHEREAS, upon survey of Bonsack Well No. 1 it was determined that the required fifty (50) foot isolation distance had not been acquired; and WHEREAS, Mary A. Chambers, the owner of the lot adjacent to Bonsack Well No. 1, has agreed to convey to the County a parcel of land containing 225 square feet. WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on November 13, 1990; the second reading was held on December 4, 1990. THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized to acquire from Mary A Chambers a parcel of land (a portion of Tax Map No. 50.01-1-7) containing 225 square feet adjoining the Bonsack Well No. 1 site in an amount not to exceed One Hundred Twenty-Five Dollars ($125.00), which shall be paid out of the current well drilling fund. Said property is to be added to and combined with the Bonsack Well & Booster Station (Tax Map No. 50.01-1-4). 2. That the County Administrator is authorized to execute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County in this matter as are necessary to accomplish the acquisition of this ~-y property, all of which shall be approved as to form by the County Attorney. - o' ~~~,~ ~ ,~pAO ~~ C~~go ~• ~y8 os /ZEE, 5~~ CIA ,E _~~ 3'2'29 ~~ .E IZ 4~.5 ~-« \ P~"~ ~•~~~~~ C ca~E~~~' b~ I p~ N h ~ ` . ~ ~ ~ T ~a ~ W v ~a. ~ -~~ o ~ ~ N v 4C ~ h ~~ ~ ~ ~ 0 k ~ s~~ i -~ ~, A~~~~~ I i -~-~~ ~ Pow 1~` ~ j0 ~ g Guy' b ~ I ~ H' I W I ~~~ I ~ I ~ v I o I 1 ~ 0.4~F9 AC. 0,~~~. ~ f D.000 AC• f ~J~iP I o. s49 ,eC. jo~i~ ~ ,.o, ~ _ ~ ~~r ,r. Qso /. PiN ~ ...38 ...- /. Pew ~ 3~• 05 ~ --- hti -- Q~ v ~ h ~ i Q o ,52T17~E ~ oc e ~ ~ f, 00 o 1 v ~ ~ N !~l ~~ o e ACTION # ITEM NUMBER ~_~ AT p' VIRGINIA HELDNAT THEHROANOKE COUNTYEADMINISTRP,TIONOENTER COUNTY, MEETING DATE: November 13, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING ACQUISITION OF PARCEL OF LAND ADJACENT TO HIDDEN VALLEY WELL NO. 9 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: v / BACKGROUND' In 1988 Hidden Valley Well No.9 was drilled on a parcel of land that was donated by the developers as part of the Fairway Forest Subdivision. Upon survey of the lot after construction of the well (see copy attached) , it was determined that we did not have the required 50 foot isolation distance from the well to the east property line. In order for the well to be permitted by the State Health Department, it is necessary to acquire additional land in order to have the required 50 foot isolation. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Staff has negotiated the purchase of the parcel of land containing 500 square feet from the adjacent property owner, Daniel E. Eller, Jr. and Helen H. Eller. The negotiated cost for the purchase of this additional land is not to exceed $235.00. ALTERNATIVES AND IMPACTS: Funds are available from a current well drilling fund to purchase this land. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board conduct the first reading of the ordinance authorizing the purchase of this land, and schedule the second reading of the ordinance for December 4, 1990. .~.~ - 5 SUBMITTED BY: Cliffor raig, P.E. Utility Director Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by: ACTION APPROVED: ~~ ~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator VOTE No Yes Abs Eddy Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers ~°. ^ Yo o ~ .~-~ w ~~ a ~` 3 ~ ~ ~ e ~ V ~ Q W ; S ro0' 35'E /Ro~/~ ~~~LLL p~ I .~5 x-/40 22 '°,'v ~ i~~ `~ ~ ~ N ~~ I QW N" •~;\~ I o~W R` D^.h~ OO I 0 ~ ~ ,PEMA/N/ F FROPER7y tiW 11 ~q~~o \~~ ~ o ~ I DAr~iEL E ELLE,2, J,¢. I ~Q-PPG ~ ~J ~ 3 0~? ~/2, P~.533 ~A~R~A~ ~~~ 9 W O IN 2 O ~' / ~ N ~/ N ~ \ t /Rare P"~ Pnd-~ I\ SEJ ~ /0 I WELL LOT `, ' 0.33¢ AG. \ ~ O I ~ a. O d ~.~. ~~ t~~ ,~ Q ~, lti/ELL \ `v ~GRA~EL-~ o LLL~~~„-111 rQO,~ ~ I \ p.v~ / rOtD o I QxK S l ~Ncr/ LrNE~ l5 loB'53"6 l.P3E7 7 O.O//5 AC.eE 5010 SQ. FEEj) ~i 70 /3E ccw/EyEo O ~ TO ,QOANOKE CD. ~ Q V SORS.~ SuPE.?- ~~-- NEK/ L/,vE 70 , / Pi.~ 5E7 `N G8' 53'r~/ ~NEµ/ Lrn/E~ 3a~o5~`R' ~I ~ 1 /00• A'J / LEGAL ,QEfERENGB ,~8. /D, PG. /22 LoJ /l D3. /287, PG. B/O~wett Lo/~ T,4x rt/o. G(o.Q¢-/' 38 (wECC Lo/) /RdJ pr,/ /PDiq~/OKE Ca/N~y BQARO OF SUPER //SOR S OP A O. D//5 ACRE ~ 5Gt~ 54 Fj) T,¢AcT flD/dr//.Ks THE WELL LaJ /N ~~LTH ~LOGK Z, SECJ/ON Z, FA/RWAy foREST ESjATES, TD G'~E CovVEyED ~` !3~' OfL//EL E. ELLER,.l,F. ~ f/ELEn/ }~ ELLE2 uc,c~. y~ss ~PosjNOK~ cOU,~,y , //RGiN/A ~~~ j"~lE~ SCALE : /"= 30" JyA/E 5, /~jo E~TIFICATE N0. ~: /.acK G f3E55 p70 ~ CERJ/F/EO LA~/O SUR~/Ej~OR J~ ~~ lANO ~P N/3. RM-G D-9o~~ ~TgS AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTI0~1 SHOifN ON THIS PLAT REPRESENT J t;' CO~pOSITB OF DEEDS, PLATS, AND CALC(TI.ATER~IIYFORIIATION ~p DO 110T RBFLBCT AN ACCURATE EOjJNDAR~ ~~ r .t~ s~ c S80•E N~6 ~ * ~ 6B' Ada, ~~ = d ~ ~ ~® ~C ~ ~0 ~ P~ ~ ~ N arvo-i PROPERTY OF ROANOKE COUNTY Tax No.66.04-I-38 ,~~~ ~ ~ OPROPOSED~ WELL - PROPERTY' •T~ACT :(see Sheet 2 ot21 ~ Q PROPERTY OF DANIEL E. ELLER JR. ~ HELEN H. ELLER / D.B. 612. PG. 533 TAX MAP ~~ 66.04-I-10 - • PLAT SHO~iING PROPOSED TRACT BE'sNG COIiVEYED TO AOiAtiOtCE COQNTY SY DANIffi. E. ELLER, JB. i HBLE~i H. ELI.BY ..~./.~+ •~{i~" ~ S a- SHEET No.l-OF•2 i° = 200 8CAlE: - • Roanoke ovnty Engi~o~rseq Ooportmont Oote s Proporod 81- . A~1ETE3 AND BOUNDS DE ~ TION AND DO NOt ~FLECTOpIRAC~ ~ Y• Pit~T:R ADD cACgJUTEO o ~-~ IW Q 8~ M h 2 iROPERTY OF DANIEL E. ELLER JR. O 6 HELEN H. ELLER (New Line) S 68° 53 E PROPERTY OF ROANOKE COUNTY Tax No. 66.04 - I - 38 BOARD ~ UPERVISORROSANOKE CO. t $ o ; PROPOSED WELL °_ ~ ~ ~_ PROPERTY TRACT N N Z N T ~ N 68° 53~ W (New Lina) 00 o~ e° N M h t0 N W z O TAX MAPMO. ss.o4-I-Io PLAT S,yOi~iING PROPOSED TRACT BEsNG CO~iVEYED TO ROA.tiOP.E COUNTY BY DAYTEL E. ELLE~t, JR. ~ DELE~ H. ELLEQ PREPARED BY: ROANOKECOUNTYEIVG~NEER/NG DEPARTMENT SHEET No.2 OF 2 ~~= 30~ SCALE: DATE: I - 22-90 I ~_Jr AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 13, 1990 ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE PURCHASE OF A PARCEL OF LAND ADJACENT TO HIDDEN VALLEY WELL NO. 9 LOCATED IN FAIRWAY FOREST ESTATES IN ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA WHEREAS, in order to meet State Health Department requirements a fifty (50) foot isolation distance is required around any public well; and WHEREAS, upon survey of Hidden Valley Well No. 9 it was determined that the required fifty (50) foot isolation distance had not been acquired; and WHEREAS, Daniel E. Eller Jr. and Helen H. Eller, the owners of the lot adjacent to Hidden Valley Well No. 9, have agreed to convey to the County a parcel of land containing 500 square feet. WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on November 13, 1990; the second reading was held on December 4, 1990. THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized to acquire from Daniel E. Eller Jr. and Helen H. Eller a parcel of land (a portion of Tax Map No. 66.04-1-10) containing 500 square feet adjoining the Hidden Valley Well No. 9 site in an amount not to exceed Two Hundred Thirty-Five Dollars ($235.00), which shall be paid out of the current well drilling fund. Said property is to be added to and combined with the Hidden Valley No. 9 Well & Booster Station (Tax Map No. 66.04-1-38). 2. That the County Administrator is authorized to execute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County in -..~ this matter as are necessary to accomplish the acquisition of this property, all of which shall be approved as to form by the County Attorney. ~A1R~A~ ~~l 9 K v O ~~t~~~~ g0 W ~O ~ v~' a. ~ o ~' •r. ~1! a? ~ 3 o ~ n1 ~Rov Pnv ~^ N ,~ ~ ~ ~o~ ~ ~ ~ ,~ o Jh~Q. Q 22.25 I ~~ ~ ~'~ I ~ W Q~ ,, ~~ o ~~ ~ `~ ~~ Q ~~ y~ \ ~ P ~~ i~ ~N ~N N S ~oo• 35"E P~~v ~ ,PEMAiN/NG i°ROPERTj~ of 0~9NiEL E . ELG ER , .IR f/ELEN H ~GLE~ 3 ~~ 0 N p. ~? X0/2 , PG. 533 T,ax ,~o. ~~o.o f -~-/o ~ i i~ ~ ../Ro'J /ROB ,~ I WELL LOT 0.3 3¢ Ate. ~ O O I ~~ ~ O O d ~ 4-/. ~ lO. V~1 v~1 O I l.~,ELL \ `V W 0 0 n ~NeH/ L/N~ 5 ~8'S3"E 1. P. SE7 D.Oi/5 AcQE (50~o s4. ~EE7) ~j To 3~ Coyv~/6yEv ~ jo RoANOKE Co. ~ /~oARp Oyu SuPER- • viso,es. N ~i ~- NEw L/NE: , P,. i 4E7 ~. AT A REGULAR MEE HELD AT TTHE ROANOKE C COUNTY, VIRGINIA, ITEM NO. ~~' ACTION NO. SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: November 13, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: ORDINANCE AUTHORIZI~NCGA ED p~THE NORTH OSIDE~OF OF A WELL LOT BURLINGTON DRIVEOIJOSEPHBNRLANDTGRACEIM TNACKLEY F ROANOKE COUNTY T COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR' S COMMENTS : G~(~vr~'t.~-+~ °~"''~~ / ~/l.•o EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: This is the first reading of a proposed ordinance to authorize the abandonment and reconveyan Grace M w Nackley (Tax Map No. 27.17- 4-4) to Joseph N. Nackley and BACKGROUND' B Deed dated April 5, 1977, Joseph N. Nackley and Grace M. Y conve ed a parcel of land (Tax Map No. Nackley (DB 1061, page 635) Y 27.17-4-4) on the north sidount B to ltheo Board eofn Supervisors tof Heights area of Roanoke C Y Roanoke County, Virginia, for use as a well lot. The deed contained a condition providinc ted on the well lot wase no longer to the Grantors if the well to used as a source of water. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The County Utility Department has abandoned the weesteddthat no further econvet the well lot t no cost to t aem as provided for the County r Y in the conveyance to the County. FISCAL IMPACTS' None - `~" ALTERNATIVES' (1) Authorize the County Administrator tacklecu and GracefMr reconveyance of the well lot to Joseph N. N Y Nackley. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board confirm abandonment of the well lot and authorize tW 11 1 t to Joseph N t Nackley and GraceeMa for reconveyance of the Nackley. Respectfully submitted, Vi ki L. Huf n Assistant County Attorney Action Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by Eddy Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers Vote No Yes Abs .+a. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 13, 1990 ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING ABANDONMENT AND RECONVEYANCE OF A WELL LOT LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF BURLINGTON DRIVE IN THE BURLINGTON HEIGHTS AREA OF ROANOKE COUNTY TO JOSEPH N. AND GRACE M. NACKLEY WHEREAS, a certain parcel of real estate located in Roanoke County, Virginia, was conveyed by Joseph N. Nackley and Grace M. Nackley to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, for the specified purpose of use as a well lot; and, WHEREAS, the donation of said parcel to the County was subject to the condition that the property would be reconveyed to the Nackleys in the event that the County ceased to use the well located on the well lot as a source of water; and, WHEREAS, the County has ceased to use the well located on this well lot and the subject parcel will no longer be used for this specified purpose. THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter, the acquisition and disposition of real estate can be authorized only by ordinance. A first reading of this ordinance was held o November 13, 1990; and a second reading was held on December 4, 990; and, 2. That pursuant o the provisions of Section 16.01 of the Charter of Roanoke Coun y, the remaining rights in the subject parcel of real estate are hereby declared to be surplus and the condition applicable to the property renders it unacceptable and .,... , unavailable for other public uses; and, ._~ 3. That abandonment and reconveyance of the subject parcel, described as a well lot located on the north side of Burlington Drive (Tax Map No. 27.17-4-4), in the Burlington Heights area of the Hollins Magisterial District of Roanoke County, Virginia, to Joseph N. Nackley and Grace M. Nackley is hereby authorized. 4. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized to execute such documents and take such actions as may be necessary to accomplish this conveyance, all of which shall be on form approved by the County Attorney. c , i AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 13, 1990 ORDINANCE 111390-7 AUTHORIZING THE CONVEYANCE OF AN EASEMENT TO THE ROANORE GAS COMPANY BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.01 of the Charter of Roanoke County, the subject property has been declared to be surplus and is being made available for other public uses, i.e. a gas line easement within the existing water line easement; and 2. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading concerning the disposi- tion of the subject property was held on October 23, 1990; a second reading was held on November 13, 1990; and 3. That the twenty (20) foot wide water line easement currently exists across three residential properties in the Deer Run Estates Subdivision; said easements were granted unto Roanoke County by deeds of easement recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County in Deed Book 1146, page 720; Deed Book 1146, page 724; and Deed Book 1146, page 726; and 4. That the twenty (20) foot gas line easement for Roanoke Gas Company, extending natural gas from Starmount Drive to Tinker- dale, coincides with the existing water line easement of Roanoke County and involves the joint use of said easement area; and 5. That the proceeds from the sale of the easement are to be allocated to the capital reserves of Roanoke County; and 1 6. That the offer of the Roanoke Gas Company of One Dollar ($1.00) for the joint easement is hereby accepted and all other offers are rejected; and 7. That the County Administrator is authorized to execute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County as are necessary to accomplish the conveyance of said easement, all of which shall be upon form approved by the County Attorney. On motion of Supervisor Nickens, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Brenda J. H ton, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Cliff Craig, Director, Utilities Phillip Henry, Director, Engineering Paul Mahoney, County Attorney 2 r .. ACTION # ITEM NUMBER ~,_ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: November 13, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: REQUEST BY ROANOKE GAS COMPANY TO SHARE A COUNTY WATER LINE EASEMENT COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR' S COMMENTS : ~~~~ ~i~,;~,,,`"~ SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Roanoke Gas Company has obtained a twenty foot (20') wide gas line easement across three residential properties in the Deer Run Estates Subdivision. That easement coincides with an existing easement granted to Roanoke County for installation of a water line. Since Roanoke County has an interest in these properties by virtue of the easements, it is necessary for the County to be a party to the Deeds of Easement to indicate our willingness to share the easement with Roanoke Gas Company. The Utility Department has no objection to sharing the above mentioned water line easement with Roanoke Gas Company for the installation of a gas line as indicated on the Deed of Easement. The gas line will be installed a distance of five feet horizontally and one foot vertically from the existing water line and will not interfere with our use of the easement. The first reading of this ordinance was read on October 23, 1990. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board of Supervisors adopt this ordinance after the second reading. l-..' _. SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED: ~ - ~%co Cliffor r ig, P.E. Elmer C. Hodge Utility Director County Administrator ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Denied ( ) Eddy _ Received ( ) Johnson _ Referred McGraw _ to Nickens _ Robers Yes Abs ~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 13, 1990 ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE CONVEYANCE OF AN EASEMENT TO THE ROANOKE GAS COMPANY BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.01 of the Charter of Roanoke County, the subject property has been declared to be surplus and is being made available for other public uses, i.e. a gas line easement within the existing water line easement; and 2. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading concerning the disposi- tion of the subject property was held on October 23, 1990; a second reading was held on November 13, 1990; and 3. That the twenty (20) foot wide water line easement currently exists across three residential properties in the Deer Run Estates Subdivision; said easements were granted unto Roanoke County by deeds of easement recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County in Deed Book 1146, page 720; Deed Book 1146, page 724; and Deed Book 1146, page 726; and 4. That the twenty (20) foot gas line easement for Roanoke Gas Company, extending natural gas from Starmount Drive to Tinker- dale, coincides with the existing water line easement of Roanoke County and involves the joint use of said easement area; and 5. That the proceeds from the sale of the easement are to be allocated to the capital reserves of Roanoke County; and 1 f-/ - / 6. That the offer of the Roanoke Gas Company of One Dollar ($1.00) for the joint easement is hereby accepted and all other offers are rejected; and 7. That the County Administrator is authorized to execute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County as are necessary to accomplish the conveyance of said easement, all of which shall be upon form approved by the County Attorney. 2 ACTION NUMBER ITEM NUMBER ~ ! -~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: November 13, 1990 SUBJECT: Appointments to Committees, Commissions and Boards COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: 1. Board of Zoning Appeals Five-year term of M. E. Maxey, Vinton Magisterial District expired June 30, 1990. 2. Building Code Board of Adjustments and Appeals Four-year term of Albert Trompeter will expire October 24, 1990. Four-year term of Wilmore T. Leffell, will expire December 12, 1990. Mr. Leffell is from the Vinton Magisterial District and is a building contractor. 3. Explore Citizens Advisory Committee The Board approved the establishment of an Explore Advisory Committee on September 25, 1990. The following appointments should be made by the Board of Supervisors: - One member appointed by each Supervisor to represent his magisterial district. (representatives from Catawba, Windsor Hills Magisterial Districts have been nominated.) 4. Grievance Panel Two-year terms of Thomas T. Palmer and R. Vincent Reynolds, Alternate expired September 10, 1990. 5. Library Board Four-year term of Leesa Dalton, Cave Spring Magisterial District will expire December 31, 1990 Y 6 Mental Health Services of the Roanoke Valley Community Services Board• Three-year term of Henry J. Sullivan, County Appointee, will expire December 31, 1990. 7 Planning Commission Four-year term of A. Kyle Robinson, Vinton Magisterial District will expire December 31, 1990. Four-year unexpired term of Wayland Winstead, Catawba Magisterial District. Mr. Winstead is resigning effective December 31, 1990. His term expires December 31, 1993. See attached letter of resignation. 8 Recycling Advisory Committee The Board approved the establishment of a Recycling Advisory Committee on September 25, 1990. The following appointments should be made by the Board of Supervisors: - Two members from the County business community - Two lay members from Roanoke County SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: Mary H. Allen Elmer C. Hodge Clerk to the Board County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Eddy Received ( ) Johnson Referred ( ) McGraw To ( ) Nickens Robers .~"~~-8 Wayland H. Winstead 5353 Cherokee Hills Drive Salem, VA 24153 Steven A. McGraw Roanoke County Board of Supervisors P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 SEP l ~ 1yuu September 7, 1990 Dear Steve: It is with deep regret that I am resigning from my position on the Roanoke County Planning Commission effective December 31st, 1990. When I accepted reappointment last January, I fully intended to serve a second four-year term on the Commission. However, my recent promotion to University Director of Planning at Virginia Tech, coupled with the significant hrrdget reductions in the departments reporting to me, makes it impossible for me to fulfill my obligations on the Planning Commission. As a matter of principle, I cannot ask others to reduce their external commitments without doing the same myself. Under the current cir- cumstances, (simply do not have the time to do the job right. With the significant budget re- ductions being experienced by Virginia Tech and other public colleges and universities, I do not foresee that my current circumstances will change in the near future. Please be assured that my decision is motivated entirely by my personal circumstances. I leave enjoyed working with you, the other members of the Board and Planning Commission, tl~e corinty administration, and the staff in the Planning Department. Knowing that it is difficult to find people who are both willing and qualified to serve on the Planning Commission, I have grvv ceoon the Commissionsbefore the endeof IDe~embe a (swill gl adly la c pt an earlier ermin ser nation date. In the last 6 years, Roanoke County has made substantial progress in its planning. I am pleased to have been afforded the opportunity to contribute to that progress. I am confident progress will continue to be made in the future. You have my best regards and warmest wishes for success. Sincerely, Wayland Win tead cc: Mike Gordon, Chairman of the Planning Commission Elmer Hodge, County Administrator Terry Harrington, Director of Planning Wayne Strickland, Executive Director of the 5th PDC cc . (Yla~ C '~ ~..~ ~ _. I AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TIIESDAY, NOVEMBER 13, 1990 RESOLUTION 111390-$ APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM J - CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. that the certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for November 13, 1990 designated as Item J - Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 7, inclusive, as follows: 1. Approval of Minutes - October 23, 1990 2. Confirmation of Committee Appointments to the Explore Citizens Advisory Committee and the Recycling Advisory Committee. 3. Acceptance of water and sanitary sewer facilities serving Woodbridge Section 11. 4. Acceptance of water and sanitary sewer facilities serving Viking Court. 5. Acceptance of payment by ITT for reconstruction of sanitary sewer line. 6. Request for acceptance of Remington Road into the VDOT Secondary System. 7. Donation of drainage easements in connection with the Ingal Blvd. Project. 2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this resolution. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Brenda J. olton, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Cliff Craig, Director, Utilities Phililp Henry, Director, Engineering -/ October 23, 1990 73 6 __ _ --_ - - --_-- Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Roanoke County Administration Center 3738 Brambleton Avenue, SW Roanoke, Virginia 24018 October 23, 1990 The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, met this day at the Roanoke County Administration Center, this being the Fourth Tuesday, and the second regularly scheduled meeting of the month of October, 1990. IN RE: CALL TO ORDER Chairman Robers called the meeting to order at 3:05 p.m. The roll call was taken. MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Richard Robers, Vice Chairman Steven A. McGraw, Supervisors Lee B. Eddy, Bob L. Johnson, Harry C. Nickens MEMBERS ABSENT: STAFF PRESENT: Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator; John R. Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator of Community Services and Development; Don M. Myers, Assistant County Administrator for Management Services; Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney, Mary H. Allen, Clerk to the Board; Anne Marie Green, Information Officer IN RE: OPENING CEREMONIES The invocation was given by the Reverend Michael Meloy, October 23, 1990 7 4 RESOLUTION 102390-1 OF CONGRATULATIONS TO ROLAND E. COOK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL UPON ITS 75TH ANNIVERSARY WHEREAS, the Roland E. Cook Elementary School has been meeting the educational needs of the children of the Vinton area for 75 years, having opened its doors in 1915; and WHEREAS, the facility was originally known as the Vinton School, and was built at a cost to the County of less than $3,000; and WHEREAS, the Roland E. Cook Elementary School is the oldest school in the Eastern part of the County, and was named for Roland Eugene Cook, who served as Superintendent of Roanoke County Schools from 1906 to 1945; and WHEREAS, there have been periods during the past 75 years that the school served as the only educational facility for all ages of children in the Vinton area; and WHEREAS, there are thousands of graduates of the School throughout the Roanoke Valley and the Commonwealth of Virginia. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT 1ESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, on its behalf and on behalf of all the residents of Roanoke County, congratulates the faculty, staff and pupils of the ROLAND E. COOK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL on the celebration of the 75th Anniversary of the School; and FURTHER, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors extends its deepest wishes .for a bright future for both the October 23, 1990 ~ ROANORE/CONFERENCE CENTER PROJECT WHEREAS, the Hotel Roanoke has been a landmark in the Roanoke Valley for over 100 years, and WHEREAS, the Hotel Roanoke has provided to the City of Roanoke substantial tax revenues and is a tourism asset to the entire Roanoke Valley, and WHEREAS, the City of Roanoke and Virginia Tech recognizes the opportunities to develop training, continuing education, conferences and conventions in the Roanoke Valley, and WHEREAS, the current owner, Virginia Tech Real Estate Foundation, Inc., and the City have agreed to begin construction of a conference center and to seek a developer to renovate the Hotel to its a first class facility, and WHEREAS, Roanoke County recognizes and supports this project as vital to the future economic growth of Roanoke City and an important project to the entire Valley. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, expresses its strong support for the continued involvement of Virginia Tech in construction and renovation of the Hotel Roanoke/Conference Center, and FURTHER, the Board directs that copies of this resolution be forwarded to officials of Roanoke City and Virginia Tech, and that a copy be forwarded to the Honorable Douglas Wilder, Governor of Virginia and the Roanoke Valley legislative delegation. On motion of Supervisor Johnson, and carried by the October 23, 1990 the future, state budget cuts should not be made up with local funds. Supervisor Robers moved to appropriate the funds. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None 3. Authorization to uQgrade Computer Aided Dispatch System for police, fire and rescue. A-102390-4 Director of Management Information Services Oscar Bryant advised that the vendor of the County's computer hardware has offered promotions and incentives to upgrade the Computer Aided Dispatch System which will be more cost efficient to maintain. The monthly operating expenses for the County will be reduced by $50.00 if we agree to the lease/purchase agreement for a five- year period. After that time, the savings will be $1400. In response to a question from Supervisor Johnson, Mr. Bryant advised the computer was originally purchased in 1982. Supervisor Nickens moved to authorize the upgrade of the Computer Aided Dispatch System. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None 4. Approval of Legislative Program. A-102390-5 October 23, 1990 L 4 6 permits. The motion carried by a four to one voice vote. Supervisor Eddy moved to approve the legislative program with the two additions adopted by the Board and the elimination of the request for flashing lights for animas control vehicles. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Robers NAYS: Supervisor Nickens 5. Recommendation on Regional Airport Commission membership. A-102390-6 Mr. Hodge reported that the Board of Supervisors had previously directed him to study other regional airport commission and bring to them a recommendation for future appointments. He advised that after discussion with other communities he recommended a small commission with one elected official from each governing body and the remaining membership composed of citizens from the business community with business, finance or marketing expertise. He recommended that a committee be appointed with representatives from Roanoke City, Roanoke County and the Airport Manager to study the issue and bring a recommendation back to both Roanoke City and Roanoke County. He pointed out that he did not recommend changes to County appointments unless there was a similar change to the City appointments. Supervisor Nickens moved to approve the staff October 23, 1990 % 4 8 AYES Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None RESOLUTION NO. 102390-7 AMENDING AND REENACTING THE POLICIES RELATING TO NON- 000NTY RESIDENTS PARTICIPATION IN COUNTY ATHLETIC PROGRAMS WHEREAS, the Board of County Supervisors has heretofore established policies relating to participation in County athletic programs by residents outside the boundaries of Roanoke County; and WHEREAS, the Board desires to revise and amend said policies in order to provide the opportunity for certain non-county residents to participate in County athletic programs upon certain terms and ~~nditions; and WHEREAS, the Board desires to revise the participation policy in Roanoke County Athletic Leagues to facilitate the formation of teams; and WHEREAS, the Board desires to revise said policies by amending Resolution No. 1585, adopted August 17, 1976. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia: 1. That the provisions of County policies relating to the participation of non-residents in County athletic programs remain in full force and effect: 2. That said policies be amended and reenacted by allowing non-resident youth, who are currently attending Roanoke County October 23, 1990 ?50 1. Explore Advisory Committee Supervisor Nickens advised that he was appointing Trixie Averill from the North side of the Roanoke River and James L. Trout from the South side of the Roanoke River. Following discussion, there was board consensus to establish a deadline of November 13, 1990 for appointments to the committee. 2. Recycling Advisory Committee Supervisor Johnson nominated Supervisor Eddy to represent the Board of Supervisors on this• committee. A deadline of November 13 was also established for appointments to this committee. IN RE: CONSENT AGENDA R-102390-8 Supervisor Eddy asked that item 5 be removed for discussion. Supervisor Johnson moved to approve the Consent Agenda with Item 5 removed for a separate vote. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None IN RE: RESOLOTION OF SUPPORT FOR A DIRECTOR HIGHWAY CONNECTION BETWEEN VIRGINIA TECH AND I-81. Supervisor Eddy expressed concern about adopting a resolution which would establish this program as a funding priority by the Board of Supervisors. October 23, 1990 752 and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this resolution. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to approve resolution with Item ,~5 removed for discussion; and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt resolution in Item #5 after discussion, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None ABSTAIN: Supervisor Eddy RESOLUTION 102390-8.d EXPRESSING SIIPPORT FOR THE DIRECT HIGHWAY LINK BETWEEN THE ROANORE VALLEY AND VIRGINIA TEC$ • WHEREAS, the members of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia have previously gone on record in support of the proposed direct highway connection between Virginia Tech and the Roanoke Valley, and WHEREAS, the Virginia Department of Transportation has included this project in its six-year plan for transportation improvements, and WHEREAS, the Virginia Department of Transportation is continuing preliminary environmental studies on a proposed route. October 23, 1990 -Z ~--_- Woodbridge Section 11 Subdivision which map was recorded in Plat Book 11, Page 145, of the records of the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, on May 18, 1989 and that by reason of the recordation of said map no report from a Board of Viewers, nor consent or donation of right-of-way from the abutting property owners is necessary. The Board hereby guarantees said right-of-way for drainage. 3. That said roads known as Mill Pond Drive and Kingsmill Drive and which are shown on a certain sketch accompanying this Resolution, be, and the same are hereby established as public roads to become a part of the State Secondary System of Highways in Roanoke County, only from and after notification of official acceptance of said street or highway by the Virginia Department of Transportation. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to approve resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None IN RE: REPORTS AND INQOIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS SuQ ervisor Eddy: (1) Welcomed Allied Signal, a new company that will be locating in Roanoke County. (2) Explained that the r_bbon he and Supervisor Robers were wearing was in recognition and support for drug . free youth programs. (3) Announced he will be meeting with citizens from 7:30 - 9:00 p.m. October 23, 1990 ~ G 6 1. Rich Boehler, 31~C Honeywood Lane 8. W. Mr. Boehler asked for assistance from Roanoke County in expanding the services of CORTRAN and RADAR, and to providetransportation from Monday through Friday until 6:15. Staff was directed to investigate and bring back a report and recommendation on November 13, 1990. 2. Marielayna Rossillo, Community Advocate for disabled, Ms. Rossillo spoke in support of Mr. Boehler's request for expanding the services provided by CORTRAN and RADAR. 3. Lee Blair, 7713 Old Mill Forest, Co-chairman of CARE, Ms. Blair thanked Supervisor Robers for his support of consolidation and thanked Supervisor Eddy for setting up meetings for citizens regarding the consolidation agreement. 4. Becky Fariss, 5123 Crossbow Circle, Ms. Fariss spoke in support of the Memo of Understanding regarding school teachers assignments if consolidation passes. IN RE: REPORTS Supervisor Nickens moved to receive and file the following reports. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None 1. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance 2. General Fund Unappropriated Balance 3. Board Contingency Fund 758 October 23, 1990 WHEREAS, Section 2.1-344.1 of the Code of Virginia requires a certification by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that such executive meeting was conducted in conformity with Virginia law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby certifies that, to the best of each members knowledge: 1. Only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements by Virginia law were discussed in the executive meeting which this certification resolution applies, and 2. Only such public business matters as were identified in the motion convening the executive meeting were heard, discussed or considered by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. On motion of Supervisor Nickens, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None IN RE: RESPONSE TO THE CITY OF SALEM REGARDING THEIR OFFER OF JIILY 10, 1990 Supervisor Nickens moved that a communication be sent to Mayor Jim Taliaferro, City of Salem, declining their $6 million offer of July 10, 1990 as settlement for those areas in the Catawba Magisterial District who could join the City of Salem October 23, 1990 760 - --- - - . Supervisor Eddy moved to adopt the resolution requesting a tax exemption of 75$ and that the resolution be forwarded to the General Assembly. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None RESOLUTION 102390-10 SUPPORTING THE DESIGNATION OF PROPERTY OF ROANORE REBOS, INC. AS EXEMPT FROM TAXATION BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF VIRGINIA WHEREAS, Roanoke Rebos, Inc. is a non-profit corporation which provides meeting space for approximately 500 Alcoholics Anonymous (AA) meetings per year and personnel support for recovering alcoholics in the Roanoke Valley; and WHEREAS, Roanoke Rebos, Inc. owns real estate located in the Windsor Hills district of Roanoke County which is occupied by a full time resident manager and which is used as the site for its sponsored AA meetings; and WHEREAS, the real and personal property used exclusively for charitable and benevolent purposes by a qualifying organization shall be exempt from taxation as authorized by Article X, Section 6(a)(6) of the Constitution of Virginia, pursuant to Section 58.1-3650 of the Code of Virginia, upon action by the General Assembly of Virginia and for so long as such organization is operated not for profit and the property so exempt is used in accordance with the purpose for which the organization is classified; and 762 October 23, 1990 candidate for public office; and 7. Roanoke Rebos, Inc. has no rule, regulation, policy, or practice which discriminates on the basis of religious conviction, race, sex or national origin; and 8. There are no other criteria, facts or circumstances which this Board of Supervisors deems pertinent to the adoption of this resolution. WHEREAS, a public hearing on this proposed resolution was held on October 23, 1990, five (5) days after publication of notice of such public hearing in the Roanoke Times and World- News on October 17, 1990. THEREFORE, be it resolved by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County as follows: 1. That this Board supports the request of Roanoke Rebos, Inc. for exemption from taxation of its real and personal property pursuant to Article X, Section 6(a)(6) of the Constitution of Virginia and the provision of Chapter 36 of Title 58.1 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended. 2. That the County Administrator is directed to forward a certified copy of this resolution to the members of the General Assembly representing the County of Roanoke and other political jurisdictions within the Roanoke Valley with the request that the proper legislation be introduced in the General Assembly to achieve the purposes of this resolution. 3. The effective date of this resolution shall be October 23, 1990. October 23, 1990 764 rom M-1 to M-2 and amend the Future Land Ose Plan map designation of approximately 175 acres from Development to Principal Industrial to allow industrial development, located south of the intersection of 0S 11/460 (West Main Street) and Route 612 (Barley Drive) and adjacent to and west of the NSW Railway, Catawba Magisterial District, upon the petition of the Industrial Development Authority. 0-102390-11 Director of Planning and Zoning Terry Harrington presented the staff report. He advised this was a request by the Industrial Development Authority. He announced that the rezoning request was to facilitate the sale of the property to Allied Signal to construct a manufacturing plant. He reported that three citizens spoke at the Planning Commission Public Hearing. The Planning Commission recommended approval of both the land use amendment and the rezoning. Ed Natt, attorney for the Industrial Development Authority, announced that the first phase of the manufacturing plant will be 175,000 square feet of office and manufacturing space. They will ultimately employ between 200 and 300 employees in two shifts. He further advised that Allied Signal will meet or exceed all government environmental regulations. The following citizens spoke: 1. Ken Winslow 5428 Yale Drive, lives adjacent to the proposed rezoning. His concerns were the possibility of the use of asbestos in the brake shoes that would be manufactured and the type of metals that would be used. He also asked when the final phase would be completed and how many employees would be hired October 23,'1990 7 6 6 held on October 23, 1990; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on October 2, 1990; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the Future Land Use Plan map designation of certain tracts of real estate containing approximately 175 acres owned by Ss?em-West Corporation, George H. Fitzwater, and Proper- . ties, Inc. and located south of the intersection of Route 460 and Route 612 (Barley Drive) adjacent to and west of the Norfolk & Southern Railroad in the Catawba Magisterial District be changed from Development to Principal Industrial; and 2. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing approximately 125 acres (a portion of the property identified in paragraph 1 above), as described herein, owned by Salem-West Corporation and located south of the intersection of Route 460 and Route 612 (Barley Drive) and bounded by properties of Mary W. Bohon (DB 629, Page 501), Helen Cox Richards (WB 27, Page 808), a 50' right-of-way, and the remaining property of Salem-West Corporation, in the Catawba Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of M-1, Light Industrial District, to the zoning classification of M-2, General Industrial District. 3. That this action is taken upon the application of the October 23, 1990 768 deceased (DB 869, Page 171); thence, in an easterly direction 74° 36' 05" E. 1,493.81' to Corner 26, an iron pin; thence, N. 30° 25' 23" E. 206.00'; thence, N. 17° 20' 23" E. 263.00'; thence, S. 10° 55' S7" E. 2,192.44' (along zoning line) bearing left of Corner 16 and an iron pin; thence, continuing in a westerly direction S. 13° 45' 07" W. approximately 1,192.90 feet to Corner 17; thence to 18 (maple snag) N. 69° 43' 04" W.; thence, N. 76° 46' 26" W. 1,226.95' passing through a gum tree; thence, N. 83° 29' 15" W. 1,562.54' to Corner 20 and existing iron pin; thence, N. 3° 16' 13" W. 369.48' to Corner 21 and existing iron pin; thence, N. 88° 55' 47" E. 433.61' to Corner 22 and white oak tree at spring; thence, N. 7° 14' 53" W. 629.52' to the Place of Beginning (Tax Map Nos. 64.02-2-51, 64.02-2- 52, and part of 64.02-2-50). 6. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. On motion of Supervisor McGraw to adopt ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None 1090-5 An ordinance rezoning 7.35 acres from RE Residential to M-2 Manufacturing to construct a contractor office and equipment storage located on Catawba valley Drive in the Catawba Magisterial District upon the request of Lacy G. Alexander. (CONTINUED FROM SEPTEMBER 25, 1990) 0-102390-12 Mr. Harrington presented the staff report. He advised that the acreage that is being requested for rezoning has been decreased from 7.35 to approximately 4-1/2 acres. He reported that the Planning Commission recommended denial in September because the rezoning was inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan October 23, 1990 7 7 WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on August 28, 1990, and the second reading and public hearing was held October 23, 1990; and, • WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on September 4, 1990; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing y~-.3-5 4.267 acres, as described herein, and located on the west side of Catawba Valley Drive approximately 1,000 feet south of its intersection with Carvins Cove Road, (Part of Tax Map Number 25.00-2-1), in the Catawba Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of R- E, Residential Estate District, to the zoning classification of M-2, General Industrial District. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of Lacy G. Alexander. 3. That the owner has voluntarily proffered in writing the following conditions which the Board of Supervisors hereby accepts: a) Facility will be used for a contractors' equipment storage yard as listed under ordinance Sec. 21-24-2A (B) and associated office uses. No other industrial district uses under Sec. 21-24-2A will be permitted. October 23, 1990 772 1090-6 An ordinance to amend the proffered conditions on 2.25 acres, to construct a retail drive-thru window, located at 4515 Brambleton Avenue, Windsor Hills Magisterial District, upon the request of Springwood Associates. (CONTINUED FROM SEPTEMBER 25, 1990) 0-102390-13 Mr. Harrington presented the staff report and explained that the petitioners are requesting a drive-thru window and a second entrance to serve the development. The significant impact factors included traffic circulation. The second entrance is inconsistent with County policy to' limit the number of access points on arterial highways. Mr. Harrington stated that under the original concept plan approved in June 1988, the access served two parking areas with a one way loop at the south end providing an exit for the upper parking area. The proposed concept plan adds a drive-thru window with traffic flowing opposite the general pattern. The second entrance alleviates some of the problem but the pattern already approved would become more circuitous and potentially disruptive with the addition of a second entrance and drive-thru facility. In addition, based on the modified concept plan, the parking space requirements could not be met, and additional stormwate~ management may be required. The Planning Commission recommended denial by a unanimous vote. In response to a question from Supervisor Nickens, Mr. Harrington advised that there is one entrance now and a second entrance that the petitioner constructed without the County's October 23, 1990 7 ~ `~ Supervisor Nickens asked the staff to meet with the Virginia Department of Transportation to address VDOT approving an entrance without consultation with Roanoke County. He also asked staff to look at the 25 foot buffer regulation. Supervisor Eddy moved to denx the request. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None DENIAL OF ORDINANCE 102390-13 TO AMEND PROFFERED CONDITIONS ON THE REZONING OF A 2.25 ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED AT X515 BRAMBLETON AVENUE ZN THE WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF B-2, CONDITIONAL, TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF B-2, CONDITIONAL (AMENDMENT TO PROFFERS) UPON THE APPLICATION OF SPRINGWOOD ASSOCIATES WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on April 24, 1990, and the second reading and public hearing was held October 23, 1990; and, • WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on September 4, 1990; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law; and WHEREAS, this property was rezoned from R-1, Residential District, and B-1, Office District, to B-2, Business District with proffered conditions, on June 28, 1988. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: October 23, 1990 ~ 7 6 adoption of an ordinance by the gove,Fning body; and, WHEREAS, notice has been given as required by Section 15.1- 431 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and a first reading of this ordinance was held on October 9, 1990; and the pub=ic hearing and second reading of this ordinance was held on Octo~er 23, 1990. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That a portion of a twenty (20) foot sanitary sewer easement located adjacent to an existing five-story adult-care facility known as Edinburgh Greens as shown on plat prepared by Lumsden Associates, P.C., dated 8 August 1990, entitled "Portion of 20' Sanitary Sewer Easement," said easement dedicated to Roanoke County by deed found in Deed Book 562, at page 405 in the aforesaid Clerk's Office, be, and hereby is, vacated pursuant to Section 15.1-482(b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended; and, 2. That as a condition of the adoption of this ordinance, Edinburgh Square Foundation hereby agrees to pay all costs and expenses required to vacate and relocate this easement and the sanitary sewer line therein; and, 3. That as a condition of the adoption of this ordinance, Edinburgh Sguare Foundation hereby agrees to dedicate to the Count a new twent • y y (20) foot sanitary sewer easement to replace the easement described above, and to dedicate to the County a drainage easement, all as described on the plat described above. October 23, 1990 7 7 8 which would reduce the RMG population. Supervisor Johnson pointed out that state funding for school employees is based on the number of students in a locality. IN RE: ADJOORNMENT At 9:30 p.m., Supervisor Nickens moved to adjourn. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None Rirhar~ W R~~or~ r~~;r~,_ ACTION NO. A-111390-8.a ITEM NUMBER ~-` '~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: Novmeber 13, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: Confirmation of Committee Appointments to the Explore Citizens Advisory Committee and the Recycling Advisory Committee COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The following nominations were made at the October 23, 1990 meeting and should be confirmed by the Board of Supervisors: Explore Advisory Committee Supervisor Nickens nominated Trixie Averill to represent the north side of the Roanoke River and James L. Trout to represent the south side of the Roanoke River. Recycling Advisory Committee Superviosr Johnson nominated Supervisor Lee Eddy to represent the Board of Supervisors RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the above nominations be confirmed. SUBMITTED BY: Mary H. Allen Clerk to the Board APPROVED BY: •~!~' Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved (x) Motion by: Bob L. Johnson No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Eddy x Received ( ) Johnson x Referred ( ) McGraw x To ( ) Nickens x Robers x cc: File Explore Advisory Committee File Rac-v~1 i ncr A~3vi ~nrv ('nmmi ttPP Fi 1 P ACTION # A-111390-8.b ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: November 13, 1990 SUBJECT: Acceptance of Water and Sanitary Sewer Facilities Serving Woodbridge, Section 11 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Developers of Woodbridge, Section 11, Waldrop Development Company, have requested that Roanoke County accept the Deed conveying the water and sanitary sewer facilities serving the subdivision along with all necessary easements. The water and sewer facilities are installed, as shown on plans prepared by T. P. Parker & Son entitled Woodbridge, Section 11, dated ay 4, 1990, which are on file in the County Engineering Department. The water and sanitary sewer facility construction meets the specifications and the plans approved by the County. FISCAL IMPACT' The value of the water and sanitary sewer construction is $25,500.00 and $51,000.00 respectively. RECOMMENDATION' Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors accept the water and sanitary sewer facilities serving the subdivision along with all necessary easements, and authorize the County Administrator to execute a Deed for the transfer of these facilities. ..J SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED: Cliffo raig, P.E Utility Director Approved (x) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion ACTION by: Bob L Johnson Eddy Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers ~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator VOTE No Yes Abs ~_ ~_ ~_ cc: File Phillip Henry, Director, Engineering Cliff Craig, Director, Utilities Ig oR ~ a+ ,ago w ~ %. j r n ,~ - SAM NDUa~a` f ~ ,£ ~d ~. ~ ~~ty~ eOit +., yu ~S MgUNT w~ j_~ ~,_ _ iu~ tea- `~, ~ ~~~~~ tiENLEY_TB_Lw.~ ~~,~ `N~W_2, gw~_^8S _,; /q' / '~7C ~RRA S7,~,~'ENi 3r ~V~ ~tiyp~x~~~"y'~.._ Ir 57 ~ 0 0 v i9 &+.' SCREEN HILL ~ ~1^~ , <`\ ~1 M ~. AVi a Y 39 .~iu ~ , ;,` E ~ ~~~~ t S' ?!~~~fnnOiE~~yOy~ ~ o? -F 2 D(CA7VR~J ~,,. ~f ~' ~ jF' TS a ' ~wDT~'ti•~l~~I ..~ .~' VICINITY ~ _~: _ ~~~s. ~P``~''~ T-~3 Q NORTH ..~'~:~. . - ~ ~~~ ~•~ z ~~ ~ - ,\ I, vdALDROP =+e, ro n» ~~ ~ --'3'~i~"` \ ~~ ,~\. ~ oa ~. .~ - _ m+ ~[[ crtc w.w ~~ -- COMMUNITY SERVICES ACCEPTANCE OF WATER AND SEWER FACILITIES AND DEVELOPMENT SERVING WOODBRIDGE, SECTION 11 d/ DEED OF EASEMENT AND ASSIGNMENT THIS DEED, DEED OF EASEMENT AND ASSIGNMENT, made this 16th day of October 1990, by and between: Waldrop Development Company hereinafter referred to as the "Developer," party of the first part; the BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, hereinafter referred to as the "Board," party of the second part; and ELMER C. HODGE, County Administrator of Roanoke County, VIRGINIA, party of the third part. : W I T N E S S E T H THAT FOR AND IN CONSIDERATION of the mutual benefits to accrue, the Developer does hereby GRANT, CONVEY, ASSIGN AND TRANSFER, with the covenants of GENERAL WARRANTY OF TITLE, in fee simple unto the Board all water and sewer lines, laterals, valves, fittings, connections, storage facilities, sources of water supply, pumps, manholes and any and all other equipment and appurtenances thereunto, in and to the water and sewer systems in the streets, avenues and public utility and/or sewer line easement areas that have been or may hereafter be installed by the Developer, along with the right to perpetually use and occupy the easements in which the same may be located, all of which is more particularly shown and described and designated as follows, to wit: As shown on the plan entitled Woodbridge, Section 11 dated May 4 19 90 made by T. P. Parker & Son and on file in the Roanoke County Engineering Department. ~~ .J The Developer does hereby covenant and warrant that it will be responsible for the proper installation and construction of the said water and sewer systems including repair of surface areas affected by settlement of utility trenches for a period of one (1) year after date of acceptance by the County and will perform any necessary repairs at its cost. Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator of Roanoke County, Virginia, party of the third part, hereby joins in the execution of this instrument to signify the acceptance of this conveyance pursuant to Resolution No. adopted by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. WITNESS THE FO~L(~W G signatures and seals: ,(,/ q/ ~ ~ ~•~ Deve c~~~~~ ` By: Title State of: ~ County/C~-qty of: to wit: Thy foregoing deed was _-~-~, _ , y of By: Dul on behalf of - My Commission expires: ,~- ` 3 Approved as to form: County Administrator of Roanoke County, Virginia County Attorney State of: County/City of: By Elmer C. Hodge to wit: The foregoing deed was acknowledged before me this: day of 19 , by Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator, on behalf of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. Notary Public My Commission expires: ._ • ~ 1. ACTION # A-111390-8.c ITEM NUMBER _~.T- -T AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: November 13, 1990 SUBJECT: Acceptance of Water and Sanitary Sewer Facilities Serving Viking Court COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Developers of Viking Court, L. C. Peters, Inc., have requested that Roanoke County accept the Deed conveying the water and sanitary sewer facilities serving the subdivision along with all necessary easements. The water and sewer facilities are installed, as shown on plans prepared by Lumsden Associates, P.C. entitled Viking Court, dated September 24, 1990, which are on file in the County Engineering Department. The water and sanitary sewer facility construction meets the specifications and the plans approved by the County. FISCAL IMPACT' The value of the water and sanitary sewer construction is $18,500.00 and $ 34,500.00 respectively. RECOMMENDATION' Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors accept the water and sanitary sewer facilities serving Viking Court along with all necessary easements, and authorize the County Administrator to execute a Deed for the transfer of these facilities. -, ~ ~~. ~./ "' SUBMITTED BY: Clifford ig, P.E. Utility Director APPROVED: ~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator Approved (x) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to ACTION VOTE Motion by: Bob L. Johnson No Eddy Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers cc: File Cliff Craig, Director, Utilities Phillip Henry, Director, Engineering Yes Abs x x x x x L/- "~ _L'.`~ NORTB -...,,;, c ' ti ', \'hr P c+ `~'~ 9 '. 7 ~fr ~+,. ~~ti F Y/ • \\~' /~~ ~d y• fti ~ ~ \ t~' s'Y1, r I ~ 0 'r~ ~ '~''; } ;~ ~~ ~~ -- ~ COMMUNITY SERVICES ACCEPTANCE OF WATER & SEWER FACtCLITIES FOR AND DEVELOPMENT VIKING COURT J ACTION # AT A VIRGINIA HELDNATOTHEHROANOKE COUNTY, MEETING DATE: November 13, 1990 A-111390-8.d ITEM NUMBER ____~~°i OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER AGENDA ITEM: ACCEPTANCE O WER LINE BY ITT FOR RECONSTRUCTION OF A SANITARY SE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR' S COMMENTS: ~~,~-~e'y~vrh ov~~ BACKGROUND' • , sewer collection system was In the early 1970 s a sanitary installed from Williamson Road to KnoPTlo~a to then time that tITT sewer service for the ITT building. installed the pretreatment facilities for the sewer discharge, the deteriorated the sanitary sewer pipe effluent from this facility need to be replaced. and manholes to a point that they In May of this year County staff requested that ITT repair these sewer lines and manhole invstandardsr the provisions of the Roanoke County Sanitary Sewer Use SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: In discussing this matter lacehthe 2, 000 feeteof sanit ry sewerdand much more practical to rep and re air the existing manholes than it would be to try p facilities. Staff has essi r tO be $57,574 of whi h alpo tion of this section of sanitary the work would be a signuntcastaff and ITT have tent tivelyeagreed sanitary sewer. The Co Y in 32,987 of the total cost. that ITT would be responsible for Pa used distribution are included A tabulation of the cost and its prop in the attached letter to ITT dated October 23, 1990. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors approve the acceptance of $32,987 as a capital contribution from ITT in lieu of their repair of the sanitary sewer. It is further recommended that the County Administrator bence andltheiro release of lability with ITT to effect this accepta stem. Staff further for the previously damaged public sewer sy ent by ITT, the money be deposited in recommends that upon the paym the Utility Department's operating budget so that it may be use along with other maintenance funds to replace this portion of the sanitary sewer system. SUBMITTED BY: . , ~~~~~~ '~ Cliffor raig, P.E. Utility Director Approved (X) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to APPROVED: Elmer C. Hodg County Administrator ACTION Motion by: Bob L. Johnson cc: File Cliff Craig, Diane Hyatt, Reta Busher, VOTE No Yes Abs Eddy x Johnson x McGraw x Nickens x Robers x Director, Utilities Director, Finance Director, Management & Budget & P~Clwc~ ti ~ z ~ i J a 18 ~~ 88 SFSQ UICENTENN~P~ A Bcauti~u/Bcginning ~- ~ ~~ ~~~ ~~ un~ ~~ 1 I C~~ I 1979 UTILITY DEPARTMENT ~ ~ 1989 October 23, 1990 Mr. Mike Russin ITT EOPD 7635 Plantation road Roanoke, VA 24019 RE: Replacement of Sewer Line Dear Mr. Russin: I have completed my review and cost estimate to replace the damaged sanitary sewer facilities between manhole MH-4A9-107 to MH4-A9-98. The total replacemeonta County Sewer1Project ow from unit prices received last week (1) Sanitary Sewer Manholes 71.5 VF @ $112/VF $8,008 3,600 (2) Manhole Frame and Cover - 3000 WT - 8 @ $450 ~~ 33,966 (3) 8 PVC Sewer Pipe - 1,998 LF @ $17/LF 7,000 (4) Paving 200 SY @ $35/SY 5,000 (5) Restoration TOTAL COST $57,574 Item 1 is for the replacement of the manholes since this is less costly than removing and replacing the invert sections while maintaining flow. Item 2 is for the replacement of the manhole frame and covers. This work will be done to meet current sewer standards. Since there is no damage to the existing frame and covers, ITT will not be charged for this part of the work. Item 3 is the actual replacement of the sewer line that has been damaged. Items 4 and 5 are for restoration of the excavated area. 1206 KESSLER MILL ROAD SALEM. VIRGINIA 24153 (703) 387-6104 Mr. Mike Russin Page - 2 - October 23, 1990 ~~ Although I feel the County has the legal right to require ITT to pay the entire cost of $57,574 for this replacement, I acknowledge that as well as replacing the damaged sewer pipe, this work will result in a better sewer line than we would have had without the damage. As such, I am willing to pay half the cost for the actual sewer line and manhole replacement and all the cost of the frame and covers. I would propose that ITT pay the following: (1) Sanitary sewer manholes - 1/2 of $8,008 $4,004 (2) manhole Frame and Covers -0 (3) PVC Sewer Pipe 1/2 of $33,966 16,983 (4) Paving - 100$ 7,000 (5) Restoration 5,000 TOTAL COST $32,987 If the $32,987 cost is acceptable to ITT, please call me so we can discuss an agreement by which the work can be done and you can be relieved of their responsibility. If the above cost is not acceptable, please proceed as outlined in my September 26 letter to Mr. Kretzer. Sincerely, Cliffo Craig, P. Utility Director mh cc: Paul Mahoney John Chambliss ~' AT THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 13, 1990 RESOLUTION 111390-8.e REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF REMINGTON ROAD INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That this matter came this day to be heard upon the proceedings herein, and upon the application for Remington Road, a section of road extending from Falcon Ridge Road, (Route 1939), 0.07 miles east of Hunting Hills Drive (Route 1541), and extending in a southerly direction 0.33 miles to Falcon Ridge Road, (Route 1555), 0.20 miles east of Upland Game Road (Route 1936), pursuant to Section 33.1-72.1, Paragraph C-1 and funded pursuant to Section 33.1-75.1, Paragraph A of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended. 2. That this Board does guarantee the Commonwealth of Virginia an unrestricted right-of-way of 50 feet with necessary easements for drainage as recorded in Plat Book 6, Page 63, (Sec. No. 3), Plat Book 8, Page 5, (Sec. No. 6), and in Plat Book 8, Page 48, (Sec. No. 7) of record in the Roanoke County Clerk's Office. 3. That this Board does certify that this road was open to public use prior to January 1, 1976, at which time it was open to and used by motor vehicles. 4. That this Board does certify that speculative interests are not involved. 5. That said road known as Remington Road and which is shown on a certain sketch accompanying this resolution, be, an the same is hereby established as a public road to become a part of the state secondary system of highways in Roanoke County, only from and after notification of official acceptance of said street or highway by the Virginia Department of Transportation. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Brenda J. olton, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Phillip Henry, Director, Engineering Arnold Covey, Director, Development & Inspections, and copy for Virginia Department of Transportation ITEM NUMBER S AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOAO~KE OCFOUNTYEADMINISTRATIONNOCENTER COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROAN MEETING DATE: November 13, 1990 SUBJECT: Acceptance of Remington Road into the Virginia Dep tmraDep ent of Transportation Secondary System. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Remington Road was one (1) of several roads within the Hills Subdivision, which was placed on the 1985 Road Bond. Hunting lans for the various corrective List. Staff has developed p actions required to bring this road into the State Secondary System. by the Virginia Department of Prior to acceptance Transportation and assigning a state route number to Reming on staff has to submit a complete package of information Road, acceptance of this road. including Board Resolution requesting FISCAL IMPACT' Funds for survey and administrative word othethEngineering funded within the yearly roadway activity Department. Construction funds will come frarticipationnin developer's P These participation in the FundsRoandBoVDOT Matching Funds. the 1989 Matching construction funds are availabns ortationccounts administered Y the Virginia Dep~-rtment of Tra P ~J`~ ~ RECOMMENDATIONS: rove a The staff recommends trint acceptance ofSuRemington Road into resolution to RoadTSystems g the Secondary SUBMITTED BY: ~~~~ Phillip T. Henry, P E. D'rector of Engineering APPROVED: ~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator i --------------------- VOTE --------------------- ACTION No yeS Abs Approved ( ) Motion by: Eddy Denied ( ) Johnson Received ( ) McGraw Referred Nickens to Robers 2 w~ wa..• f-M - . ~ , ay ; C !. • ~ i. :1 PROPOSED AD~DY ION SHOWN IN DESCRIPTION: Remington Road between Falcon Ridge Road (Route 1555, 1939). LENGTH: (1) 0.33 mi. RIGHT-OF-WAY: (1) 50 ft. ROAD WIDTH: (1) 30 ft. SERVICE:W(D)H19(homes ft. .- ~! • ~ \:. T ~ M ~ ... .. _~`~. -rte . ~ ~ j~ 0 ~ .% . .~ ~~ ~ i• ,~ / w . ~ / w - ~ e a ..- ACCEPTANCE OF REMNSPORTATOION SECONDARYVSYSTEMA DEPARTMENT OF TRA gNGINBBRING 3 ~-- AT THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOE~OANOKEPCOUNTYRADMINISTNRATION COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT TH CENTER ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 13, 1990 RESOLUTION REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF REMINGTON ROAD INTO NDARY ROAD SYSTEM RTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SE BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: to be heard upon the 1, That this matter came this day oceedings herein, and upon the application for Remington Road, Pr Route 1939), from Falcon Ridge Road, a section of road extending and 0.07 miles east of Hunting Hills Drive (Route 1541), extending in a southerly direction 0.33 miles to Falcon Ridge Road, (Route 1555), 0.20 miles east of Upland Game Road (Route 936 pursuant to Section 33.1-72.1, Paragraph C-1 and funded 1 ) rsuant to Section 33.1-75.1, Paragraph A of the Code of pu Virginia of 1950, as amended. 2, That this Board does guarantee the Commonwealth of Virginia an unrestricted right-of-way of 50 feet with necessary Page 63, (Sec. easements for drainage as recorded in Plat Book 6' Plat Book 8, Page 5, (Sec. No. 6), and in No. 3), Plat Book 8, Pa a 48, (Sec. No. 7) of record in the Roanoke County Clerk's g Office. 3, That this Board does certify that this road was open to ublic use prior to January 1, 1976, at which time it was open to P and used by motor vehicles. 4 tact 4. That this Board does certify that speculative interests are not involved. 5. That said road known as Remington Road and which is shown on a certain sketch accompanying this resolution, be, an the same is hereby established as a public road to become a part of the state secondary system of highways in Roanoke County, only from and after notification of official acceptance of said street or highway by the Virginia Department of Transportation. 5 ACTION NO. A-111390-8.f ITEM NO . AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: November 13, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: Donation of drainage easements in connection with the Ingal Blvd. Project to the County of Roanoke COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: This consent agenda item involves the donation of the following easements to the County of Roanoke for drainage purposes in relation to the Ingal Blvd. Project in the Catawba Magisterial District. a) Donation of an easement from Helen R. Gay, (Deed Book 1078, page 766) (Tax Map No. 54.02-3-26) as shown on a plat prepared by the Roanoke County Engineering Depart- ment, dated 5 September 1990. b) Donation of an easement from Merita B. Miller, (Deed Book 1182, page 948) (Tax Map No. 54.02-3-27) as shown on a plat prepared by the Roanoke County Engineering Depart- ment, dated 5 September 1990. The location and dimensions of these properties have been reviewed and approved by the County's engineering staff. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends acceptance of these properties. Respectfully submitted, i' V ck'e L. H m Assistant County Attorney Action Approved (x ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by Bob L. Johnson Eddy Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers Vote No Yes Abs x x x x x cc: File Phillip Henry, Director, Engineering Cliff Craig, Director, Utilities ~~1 COUNTY OF ROANORE, VIRGINIA CAPITAL FUND UNAPPROPRIATED BALANCE 9,608 Unaudited Beginning Balance at July 1, 1990 $ Balance as of November 13, 1990 Submitted by Diane D. Hya Director of Finance $ 9.608 _ f "' *'" COUNTY OF ROANORE, VIRGINIA GENERAL FUND UNAPPROPRIATED BALANCE Amount Unaudited Balance at July 1, 1990 $2,653,756 July 1, 1990 Amount reimbursed by County Schools 500,000 September 25, 1990 Appropriation to Police Department (200,000) September 25, 1990 Rescinding Parks and Recreation User (85,421) Fees Balance as of November 13, 19901 $2.868.335 Submitted by Diane D. Hyatf Director of Finance 1 This amount does not include the estimated addition to fund balance from 1989-90 operations of $2,800,000. ~ `J ~°.~ COUNTY OF ROANORE, VIRGINIA RESERVE FOR BOARD CONTINGENCY Beginning Balance at July 1, 1990 $ 50,000 August 28, 1990 Roanoke County Code Book Supplement (9,845) September 25, 1990 Contribution to TAP - Transitional Living Center (15,000) September 25, 1990 Contribution to Darrell Shell Scholarship (1,000) October 23, 1990 Replacement of lost State Revenues for the Arts (4,250) Balance as of November 13, 1990 19.905 Submitted by ,~.+L:x. ~ )'-,S~ ~ , ~ Cry/ Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance „., ,~ _ I 1 ~ ' i I ' i ~ i ~ I ~ 0 0 0;0 0 o a o ob 0 0 ~0 0 0~ ~ ~ .0 0 0'0 0 0l0 0 0' ' I ' , ; 0 0 0 'o 0 Oo 0 0 o W W W W W W W N N'N N N N N N N .°• -~ .r ~` -' OD -J c~ G• N 1n V1i A A .P ' ! ' ~' I , w w w N ~l~A N --'o W •d, +n l~ ~6 W N -~,o ~ W N ~ o W WA ~ o~ -~ o~f0 ~ o j O 1 i W N --1'O 0 O ' £ N 2 A 3 A ("1 ~ ~ ~i 'U nI T 'U r ~'9 -I 2'C --I 3 ~T W A r 'D ~ 'V ~ .~ D '~ Z ~ ~ 7 ~.~ H .i ro 7 O ro ••. ro: 7 ro N '~ ~~ 7~ ro iP W 7 W O ~+ W O 7 0 0 0 W ~D C ro N W ' . 1 p ] W '.7 7 7 ~-' W] n UI "~; W<< '~7 O ro ro 7 7 •~. x .i I •-. x .+ N N 7 n K 7 U ' N ~-' W ! ~ ] ro ~0 A ~-n 7 I O n 3,'i IP ro ro ~ '? N y CL 3 N ?i ~.~ ~D O] ~'~ UI W 3 -~ j W a ~- ~ In 7 n ] c .~ m ~- ~~ o In ~7 y y ' W ro c~'< m a• Sul ] ] 'a o x; ~ m o '.i W -,,, 7aWro~Irocc! n ,- •+ 7N3 ]~•n] G ~. In ~p V1 •i .i W N • ~ -i O I -G O ro ~~ n N N •~ !'1 ~ N~. N N ro '. W O O L N] 1 4~ a'n ]ro>nul7W - ' ~ ~ , ~ D '--1 n, ...m.,; mmroW71 ulln]v y u r ~.mro •c oust ~ro mom. ! r D I a a]~+W;ax.na]W;-e arort' vo ro7o'n-n' n~ w]-~o~•~~ r ro]In7v~ ' r ' '' . ,.] O N~UI iD 7'f) O ro'7 7 y!"~l n O; C ~ N ~,n N n ~ ~+• C.N < '1 N ~ '~ 'n O O 7 ~'•O C a.I O O ~O 7 C' ~'•,"1 'D N'. ~D n •-W n ~ r~ ~~ O - ! C O -1 ~+• '7 n! n N n N ul ~. N 3 3 '.7 W -J ; .- ~O W ~-•' 7 O ro x N w -{ ~•' n ' I ;Z ] ~• y,,. ro W .i ~~ro .'~ 7 .t, O. '..r 7 N '] 7 Y W ro ~-+ ro ro W x C ] y x N • ro ST1 ro Cl r ' ' 'O . . • . O n rt'iW N ANA '1 I'J C C`ro ~O ~ .i ry .~ ry r ~ - ' , ~ ~ . , 7 !~ Cl O ~ W .+.. ro . W ID r ' rp O ! < UI N '... ro n , ~D 'ro O -I rt n K ' O ~D o ~G N i ,, < O ' ~'• ry ~D ;.a in ry : '.N r+ O ! D 7 7 - I n O O •S!1 ~'•'' N '7;n C ro ro m B W ~'~ ro --1 i 1 I 'C D'1 N CL' ] W'.N O O 7 N; ~1 ~N O x O] W ~I N T) -1 O N ' O --I' ] N x W ' ~ - nro y ~+• .+. 7 C 3 to -ti h z ro x; W W I N N' p ~ I . . n dn,< ro N ro W~,.. ~ 'D3 N'. UI x! 5~ x W ro ' I I . "rl I 'D O ''~ N 'N .~ ro ~ -A y O I ro I i i ~ ~'~. !n 7' O] I I N '~. ~ N UI ] ~' . ~y p I I ; o I A ~ ' j .-~ to ' '>7 ] ID ~ 3 i ... y i ~ j ~ y a,W ,~ j ,~ ~ j ~ m ~ o °) ~ ~ W ' '` j j ~ I '~ f ,; ~ i ' ~ A ' ~ p i KI i i I W I~b ~ If0 ? ~ ' 'I f0 ~.~ y W o I CO ! ! ! N~ A-NCO W'' WN.A !-~ W' CoNfU .QW W~UIW W Wow ' I C ~ - ~ ' ~ , N A-• o o W •J Ui o U7 0+ o Co 0 0 0 -J N. ~,w W o+'-J w N IJI ;m I LL . .~ c+-- o o:o o N c+ !N N' o otn o o UI N o n) o o0 0 0 .:, o w N ~~ j w ~w . -J ' Vooooowo'c+ io UI'N OOUIOOooo~Uloo'o oooo0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 1 ~ 1 '~, ~ •A !A ~ ~7, y, 0 0 0-o A o Ul jo o lfl 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a ' ' 1 ' w !iw ~ ! 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 .p'~, ~0 0 0.o m o c+ ;o o I i ' ' ' ~ I i ' j , . . , ; I i ~ - i ' ' 1 I ~ 3 ~ N N ~ I ~ I m O I~ '~ ~, I i ~ -~, ro to w -~ N w -- ~ 'ro vl I w ~ a ..., n) -- m m a N -- •~ On W ' ! I c] I ro ~+ 7 I o I o . UI l~ A ~, ~ Oo ~ o In o -J ~A w In w •, N' A W ' .a N i -.1 ~I -~ W i ~ '. W W ?-~NUI w ('+ I'W ;'^I COA to -'.Nm.P'. U7 GUI ~A •JOO--~-~toW - I ro~ n . ~' ~. 1 ~. -J '~-J ~~•.! CGO W oNwN. Vo c~[>~woomo.-.I Wl~ -J [o -.I •J V1 C' ~ I I . I ,p '~..p .Q l~ w w Cn G+ '~ O~ '. lFi ~n ln. w l~ W ~~ to w W N ' Co l~ o w o -- -~ l~ -' I . -+ I F) ~ I p o p ~ ' N o+' W o -~ ~ i A N o W -. w W -J W w ~ A W ~I N -- m c+'A -~ CO a+ VI W w ~ Co -1 ' L~ Ul ~ I< -i 1 ro -1 ? . ~' ' A IO fV ... pp N oc~o.A-•-411 ~1 `-J Wo c ~O INW w ~ AwG+ o O N !N . . . ~ . N • I C I I ' ~ j I - .O .A fV'o-.1 `•A' ` A o~O wN-JOO+'A W~'.r ~i rA-r N'A OD w' ONU1w~V - I ro . . W 'W N !b W No--Now J.A W A'ODItIW-~V1•J wt0o~--.A W wow~l~ 1 In I w w • n) W W o o N In -- w ~ to o UI U1 .Q -~ -J o -J w l~ N Co w -P N ~! Vl w A l~ I 1~ ~' 1 ~~' N' 1 C ~ ~ ~ -J •J •, Co ,I fV' N N W •~' N W -~ N W N n) o N N N N E [o N N ~ I W ro ~ W n) ;. N N w -I ~ -•~ w c+ N U1 o N , l~ -~ .t> ~I -~ 4f1 Ou W w Co VI c m -- -J N w A N ~ ' I . ~ w w i0 !a In -J .A -•~ .A In -- W -~ In pD CO .ANN G N N W ~. m O W ~ Ri fA O. -J --' O O+ i ? ~ ~ ' ~~ J o -- o o w J w o --' -- V7 ~I'.w N N c~ ~.. I n W ' N 'N , CA -~1 A N w o W N .~ W ~ W I O CD N •~ V1 -J' U7 W A W V1 m w .A N O o~ W (10 N G+ O w o N o ? tT • I I ro ~~ o ~. o . n ro AN ^I O'U' o•JfV[oc~•-~[Ow1J1 lJ1A-`NONOO.A-JNoVl ~1NA0U7 .A I 4 I ~ w I , 1 1' I I '. ', i ~ . a _ I ', ~ I , W -f . ~ I to ~ ` d ~ , W ~ I m d ~ i ~ I ~ ~, I C W I W: ,~ w ~ •' ~ l a m ~ . I' N ! c+ Uf N -' ~: N ~ ~ ~ N fV W -~ N N~ m W W lJl 0)..O A •~1 rT A P 1.1 On N C W N W C4 W Q+: N I W N 1 -J ~ m I mo.\' ro ~' . . ~ . ,. O~OOd~o UI ~'-~v-~W oO~j~oQO:w-JW!'-~.n ~D oww-Jw•.1 ~~0)-J'. lq -J •J I ,~ O ro I; -n7 N o N W c+ --; o A w o •J -~ N U1 -~ rn -J .C 1~ N -~ o i N ', , - o 0 o N ~I W N. P -J W h o I j ~~. li I it I I i i1 I i i i ~I ~ ~ '; ~ ~ ~ ~,I ~ ~~ ~ I I ! i '~ '~ I ! ~ ~~ I ~I I ~ ~. I ' '. I ~ ~ ~ . ~ _. -_ ~ i '~ ~. 1\~ -_ ~ .~ ro {{{ C ~ 4 Z O I i ~ O ] v = i 0 1 In # w 0 o ,~ D y r C 7 a ,A o W ? h n 'TI 3 H ID ' ~ ] r, -~'. D C7 r O'O -n C 3 ] om~ m -c ~ ~ z ~• o 3 -A I W .+ ;il D ~D O CO l1 W 7 O W U T ] x aro b D D -1 n < m .... c -s .r W O O ~ r. ~ ] j A ". D W \ < w ro 0 ]. C ro N I, O '•0 D D ~ O mm 0 0 Q O O ... ' ~ O ' ~ ~ I ,~ ., •~ ~ . i ~ ~ ~, ~I ~i ~.. ,~ , ~ ., : ~ Io 0 0 0 i ~ !0 0 0 0'0 0 0 i ~ o~c o o~o o o~~o o o'o ' ~ o N In In N '~~ _ A A A A A A A ~ ~ W '. W W W W rU i , j W N O W W fU N j , A W,W N N~.~ ~ ~ A.A W N. -' i rU N o '~. :N o Vl o ~ o ut'o lf1 0 ,tn o ~ I Ln 'o 0 0!0 ~ ~n o o 0 0 0 ~ ; o i 'D N '0 3 ~' ~. m 3 ~ ~N D fil c~ ~ D ~t i C7 ~l f , < n' 7 m ri 1 f ~ C C C ro ~~ m w 7 w m ~+ N ~ 7 0 O "' w i "' O O •' '~ m ny 1 . Q~ U J 7 7~ "• 'A '7 41 r~ 7 '7 J£ ~ fl 3 C ro 7 ~O , t+1 - ' ..-. ,p .. n o ro w r~ 7 C ro r• ' 0 3 in -f ro o , •r B 7 0 n ro o n r~ r• A "7 ~O 7 Ut ro N ; W ' ~ ~ n n O~ w ro ro ro ro"'' •+ to 7 n Qe7 r' of ~ 7N o O w ~' o 9 w 7 o ... ro 7 i w ~~ o ' C ~+ -n o £ o h ~ w o ~ 'y .+ 2~x n:7 w C1 f 7 ~ CI :n r. a)O £ m w "~ IA ro ro ro '71 V? O r. 7 r r..+ i'O p '..t O m, y ti j ~. ~. GI :-+ 4 r ~ U1 7 w w ' C m 3 ~, 7 n UI :O '. C 7 r• 7 N: n ' C ~+ ,+ ,7 ~ m 'Tl ro ~ n r~ d r .-~ Q "7 V ~O m V? C7 Q A fl ro "~ ' d; 7 rp J ry p r i N ro .+ .+ < .-~ O,.+ O 1 7 R. C 7 ' •. - ' ' ~ H X 7 7 ~. 7 r r• m '~ m N N r• . m O I m n~ m 7 ' w 7 , ~~ . ' w .+ n n x, C w '~ D '. n r: m CI 7 "~ N D w y w cn O ' m p ; o. ,,. w .. m w o f ~ ' ~ H; 7 0 w ~ . a. ' O I m ,: m r I ~~ i ~ n ~ °= m i 7 o n r ' n m ~* ~ B m 7 a w : a ~ a ,~ .+ B rf ' ~~ i N ~ In ~' ~ ~ ~' ~ ii '~. o - ~ I fU N. A - - - - ' '. to UI I I m . ' ~'..0 o A -• _ to ~, W W O~ ~ o ~ '~, W -~ m W ~~ ~ W ~'. o+ A •~ o' ~ X I C I d W ~ -~ 41 .,I ;. W i Du o w N -~ -~ ~ ~I -~ -+ Co N In : ' W N N ~ 11 ~! Uo j 'G+b-JA V1-', N 'U1 -'A,W V' ~UI U1 V' -~A111 m , W~ O , ~ -A CIA I ro.. '. Ito W ~'. ~ •J ~'i A . W -- N ~~~, A ~ '. In c+: o o -J' ~ O I. ' O In l11 ^1 ' W -J u~ I ~ I , W -~ W W A ,~. W O .O A w -. A A W -~ N W ' Do o ,l -~ ~ ~o o~ I '~ ~! m N -J ~I ~' -d ~ .'1 A -~ W '~ ~ , O~ m -~ N W ~I O W A A CO o m ~, ' i i m ' ~ 1 x ', . I '~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ I U 3 '~ ~ ( ~ I ~ I m O , I mv1 ~ -' wAwnvl, ' A A 7' ~ro N A'~ -~ ~, vJ : J o J In -J ~1 b ' o Vi N ~Il A W •J ~ •~1 o u~ o .n ~ ~., i ~ ~' o~ ~ W ~I N '! ~ A' -J o -~ ! N ~I ,I to N' o W ~ N W ~ .r ~ o W V, N in ~ -J - 1 C ~ " i ~. CO~oO of U1 ~o VI W CU -~ :C OO CU O. rp vJ In to W M •~Ut-~ W J In V7 W W f I 1 ~~ W W ~1~ tD ~,, ~NNto w~. 0D 0+ ~~ N.VI WN; In -J NN-J A, . .a N I m o ~ i ~ I 17 G ~~ ~ i ~ ~ . o W ~ t A ' N ' ~ '~, J J ~ I C to 1 3 ~ A ~ A ,I W A ~'~, i LO - ~l w ~ - - I '7 7 111 0 ' ~: N ~.I ~ A W ~~ I W ~~~. ~I o to ~ .r. -~ ~ W o N a ~ °I- w a ~ (A U1 A c~! 111 -J o ~0 N', ~ G+ 41' W A o A UI W -J A .O W ~l rp ' I 7 I ', '~ ~I Oo ~ A W In W ~1 G+ •D' '. In VI.N -J N m A, In W D` Cn ~ In W , m :O : i ~ ~. i I m x ' ~, ro' ~ ~~ : A ~ ~ y N - N I I Q. 'V 1 m ' 1 -i 7 G ' , -J N -~ m ~ o, c+ ~1 N fU A ~. A In N o+ fU J+ ~ -- W A VI o v 7 ~ . o oln Cb ~l ro oto--pro rao VI m~c,~w ~ -win u1 o- w ~ i ' ' iCP U1W W W, ac'v' Ad'"~ 'r WDOWIno G~ --NN N. ~!-~W I 3 C I Q-y io 111 c~N VI NAW -~o.~ W '~W ~o Co OoN Cu -~v~ ~ c~rUN I ' '~ i A U' c+ A o'. -~ ~:! In o O+ W A '.., ~1 0 -.I W W W A c+ ~O 00 0 b W N N I i 1 7 i y ~ I m 7 ~-J W A W W~ ~~ P'~ ~ ~ I -~ W A Do Gam. N A N ~ o I .w~. n I C '~ ~ .:1 0 -~ ~~ CG' •D O N N ,1''O ~1 , ~ .r100 A ~ C ' In -~ W -J o -d ~D ~ ~ i Q+ W Co o+ . ~ W N W W A -~ -• v7 '~, o b V' A l11 N C -~ to c~ Cn ^1 ~ ~ I 7 D' ~ N -1 ~! :]o In W o+ A ~1 W N o ! A W ~ N o+ ~'. o A' Co N N Ut ~ c~ U1 W I, I fl ro I ro y ' ~ W N -! W c+. N A o C7 t0 A 111 -~ W N W W ~I O Co -J A Co: 41 '+1 -J ' ~' 1 ~rUON o: U7 vJ.-~to J.. ~1 CO !o N:tro ro ~lw N W W lJl W, W 41 G I d ~~ ~ i ~ ~ i ' ~ ~I I ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ I ' ~ ~ I i ~ t7 I m ul ~ , ~' ' ' ~ W W~~N W W Ul I a w 7 m I~ fl x ~ N W Vt ,i W ~ ~ W N ' ' A A W A W ; oo+W o N -JAJ~ N~o % \ i j ~ -.IONo ,CO-.1c+-J W W i . ~ , / 3 m' A ~o o~' -.1 ~ w o w In W •n ~ I o~ m W ~.I m N -~. W o A in '. o I O O' 7 (1 1 -* II I I ': N to --I N ~ Co o N In W Oo -J I i i c+ .0 0 o CU ~ : .~ -J -~ ~. In -~ W 0 , i ~~M _~ -n m C ~ Z O O ~ d Q 2 N 0 Gl N U y ~ w n ro -n a C .C-~ 7 a ro O o -n A m :~. r U U) m Ci n 7 O ray r r~ 7 .~ .+ 3 C ~c O '7 z m o ~ m ~~ 2 - 1 m o 7 w an7 CO C O 3 F G U ro ~ ~ - v rJ 7 < b +l " -1 ro ~ m N ~ r o w ~ 7 w wa \ A J' U ov 0 7 O 7 N o v D D -+ G7 mm -- o -- o \ o 0 0 J I o i ~'~ u~ ~ ~ ~ " t ~ ~ n~ _ ~ ~ _; ~ ~ ijr a ni u ~ i ~ - W, __~ ~ WIC ~ ~ ~ i ~ - 'ice I O I I ~ O O O ~O O O ~O O O I I O O ,O O O O O Q O O I I O O O j ~. O b b , b b'b b b b b b;b ' W OD ',lA LO 00 j ~ ' '~~ ~ -J ~ -J n 111 A W E I l~ 4f1 411 to A A i m O+ ~ :-~ l/l N VI A A W W N o lll ' I -t. W N N ooVloUl ~ ~ooooo ~ oV1o ' Nr ~ IP N:o Ulolflo ~ ' ~ I ' .+ ~'.r ' (7 A ~ DTI -7 3 m r C' ~ "0 O 'm C•7 V n [l D r" 'O I N ,-< ~" : ~~ I 7] I . 7 7 'O ro ro ro a ~+~ 3 ' ~ C iD n 0 ~' C O N .J. a ~°- 7 UI l7 y ~ 0 0 7 n C N ~ rf .•~ j ] x N V < a ',3 ~-'• -~ ~ ro 'D .+ 3 C r« n .r ~ a .I Q < ~O O a D 7 'P 7 0 ~.r .t .-• -1 ~c .o "• `t `~ , ~ I o ~ b y ro a •7 o b '~ 7 •O ~.~ Q N O .'Oro 'O ' 00 r . ;0 ro 7 I -d C y N a l4 ' 'lll . a 7 ~'• ^~ ' ~ G+ "4 -~ o ~~ .w ~c ^~ "1 '7 C ro 7 ~ o ' n G 3 y ~. j o y ... ,.* 7 o 0 ' ~ 2C i '~ o C C of . O O10 "7 a ~ro of ~ ~'.-.a 7 o a Qw~c 4. ' . to a n i, i 7] ' y V '.ro N n r ~+. a ro ro y ro 7 ! ' • ('1 i -•1 3 n rt~ '1 ro •~ I '9 ~- C 7 •+ ,~ ~ >: ro < ~ -4 i ; d O. Z ; G 7 7 ao ' - ' o i , a 7 a< a. a 'mom ro m y ro o y ~ a -i'-~ o 7 nm n a m a ~• a s;cQ a.-m om 3~ ! 7 h ro m ~ y 7oc~ n -f a <77 7 y y I n .,; .-....~ me 7 3 4n < N. x a y 7 0 ~-a ro ,~ ~ ~, w. u. a s o' ' n ro 4vro ~+v ~4n ro c ' v ~ro mo, , . n D a ~ ro ~••~ -t, >> '. ro o a a o a -a y , - 7 , ~• x 7 o ro . y< o h ~• ' z •• a: '' 4n ' n ro -~ m In -nom v a ro . • c •- m< 7co'ax.....-7 .. ; .. .....vro7: ~ ao~ ..• Q. a N ro ~ 7~ n' In .' n ro .t ~ ,c I .r £ ro ut n 7 to 7 ~ ' ~ iD y' ~O O ' N N 3 '. a ro 7 O O I d' ~'. '7 ~. i ' y .i ro N ~ '7 •s a C ~~ a 7 ~ I .i O ~ 7 ~ ro a ~ ~ < "1 ' ~ -A 7' I i O O I 7 3 n ~ < 7 .r ~~ a m ' G + ~ ro ' C UI a '. .•~ ~ y ~ ~ r. '' ro rF ' '. y N I j . i . a .- ~ y m ~ o j ~ '7 O O~ ro a j I i N O •~ ~, '7 n 3 1 ro I, ! y 4~ i6 2' I O~ ''. I , I ~ ' a ~ 3 n a c! ~ 7 ~ ,, 7 N ~ l '',~ ' i ~ ' ~ ~, I a ~ '~ -. j ~ I W ~ i ~ , ~ N ~ I • '. W ~ I ~ -J i O + ~ N I , ~ ~ ~ I ~ .~ i ~ ~ I I I N ~ fA A I N I ~ 0+, ~'N w -' - o f .., W .r A i 4~ o N N W i -.1 W ~ N W N A o N W 1~ OD 'I b W b W -~ , 1 0. j ~ ~ .-.. m o; A W In 0 a o - 'A o A a• A, o 0 0'. rn N! J -~ . o m N o+ N ' W o A I~ ~ o b C7 N o o ~ .. ` I ro i A ~ o'W G+ ~ N''o o'c+ o Oo ~b m ~ N ~!O o to ~ J '~Ut o c+ -- m ' -~~ b'W a I n . 1 rJ bOD -~'. No oAotl7o c~ oo'oN W o o U1 CpPb A lfl ' Co --o A b a 1 ;J ~7o Oo ~~ 0 0 0 0 o G',N ~^ o G+W W X11 0 !o W~ 0 9p , ~ I f ~ I ml I I x I ~ ~ I ' I V 3 >~ ~ I ~ , I ro O ''. ' `A P ~ ~ N ... ~ ' N 17 7 .n . 4n m ~'W -- W! 'A N W ~ ~ ~ b o ' m -~N I d s I ~ ~l W o N O -O 00 A c+ W A Ul I ~ b _ 417 0 0 -J l~ b ^I w I .+ .-. ~' ~ A A ~' W W I o O+ ~+ ' ..r W ~ W N A o l~ -J b N ' o A Co I C K ' j 07 CA . O+ W b m O~ •J ' b b A ~l U7 ~ C77 ~ o O LO A A A ' b -J I 1 ~ N N ~ ~. A ~ A ~ 00 b A~ 9D G~ O~ O A N O O ~1 W ~n m (•' CO I ~ N ' ~ ~ I ' Imo 7 C 1 n ~~ ~ ~ I C 4n '. _ _ w '. W 1 3~ I P. Q` b. W'A ~' ~ A N 'A _.,..... 4z a I .. _ I. y 7 N ~ ~ -~ ~ In U1 0 ' ~ V, o •J I a ~ , J O+ A ~ 1 i I ~. (D J G~ ~ b ~ P ~ A VI In b CO -J ro uJ j ~ ! 1 m r f ' I. ~..: ~ ~ I 1 rH v I tF1 Vl I ~ j i I N VI Oo ~ ~ -~'. lJl OD ..• W b -~ N ~~ -J ..• N W CA .A -' a I -I 7 d ~ In ~ ~ l~'. m ': N NA ' WbAW-~ o 'in UimW o A ~1NW i d~ .~ i ~' A Gam LJ1 ~ -J ~~ Wf NW.O I~-- ~ OD Ilo lnN~CO G~ ANo 1 3 C ' A ~ 'pp W . W -J A W ~ GO I b~ -J W' G+ QO W -~ ~: o o N b ~O b b •.! ~ Y I Q N N A' , o O I b W J'~I O`W W Nlll' A ooNlnC -~ ~a+A 1 N C t ' j 7 W W ,: ~ '. N 1 ro '~ N ~ I 1 07 7 'w m o -~ m ~ -- N w ~', m ' c 1. ~' -~ -- w' ~ ,a w b NG+A~i co A N ~JN t a n 1 rC : N ; -.~ o-- N N b ~ W Ul o'O+o O O+NO NO.AONN l~ b'i AG+N - mo-`IN-~ o 'lJ1oc~NA b 'JbC' 1 7 U 'b ~ O{A b' N N~'o ~ o~P o G+~~1 N~ b -J~^•I A A'j N 'lfl 111 Ab CO + 'O lA A o b ~A w I n ro I ro '~ ' 'b bb W ~~ ~ w N.o 0~ o'A o ~.I In -J N G+W A of ' ~o o to c c o c~ A -- W Oo N~ ' '~. ~A ~1 -J W '., o o 0 0 o I,o o rn W N'~ b o N! W ~ N o W , i a A o b o'm ' i i' o', ,I ~ I i. i. I o 0 0 0 ob o m N 0 0~,0 0 0'.0 0 0.117 I a w -I -. -~r i 1 ? ? I ~J ~ ro C ~ z o 'r O y .~ ' v d 1 2 fu , o ' G1 N 7 ro y m C 7 a N n ro a C m 0 o -n A m r x 77 (fl ro C'i t7 7 O D O. C r '- 7 h ~ 3 C ~t O y 2 ro G -1 N -h x- Imo ~ a an7 V7 C O 3 F' OR~D 'rl '1 a o~ < any -i ro y main 7. o a ~ 7 a wa \ D .9L o~ y V ~• a O N J ! . i ~ i w UI U I C m j ~ ~ ~ l as o m Nw',m-N, ~Itnwwro ; --ww to nx N b0 0 rA 'w 4.n lfl ~ b Q7O o i % \ a N ~ . r j o W~W -d o ~ W N N~ '. AW ~ I O R 7 411 0 ~ DD ~ ' 1 III '~, -.t ~ -d l/l IP ~ N ~ A ' i "A ~. ~' ~ i ~ I '.. v v ~ ~, D D ~ ~ ~ -I G'7 mm o ~ ~ o I I i \ o ' I I I ~ -~ N I ~ ~, ,i I ! ~ b I i ~~I ! ~! ~j I' I ~: O { f a j , y ~ \ r ,. ~ A A ~~ I ~ 1J ~~ & U T. ~' ~~ T __ ~ !1 I t' ~ '~~... •1 !] t i .. 11 ~ l ~ ~. .. c) i ~ ~~ ~' ~ e ( ~. ~~ ~ _ i 1 i I i j ~ ~ ~~ i ~ ~ i ~ I . I ' I ~~ I ~ C ~ r i ' ~ z ° E ' ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ i ~ ~ I ~ ~ i ~ ~ ' ~ ~ I ~ ! I ° ~ i ~ ! , , ' i i ! I ' ~ ' i , I i i ~ I ~ o .6 c i i ~ I i r ~ I ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ I i ~ ~I T ~. i ~ I i .. I i ~' I C , ~ i Z ~ i I ~ ~ ~ ! ~ ° ~ I ! i ~ I ~ ' i o ~ I ~ ~ i i i ~ i % ~ o ; C ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ i ' ~' ~ ~ m .., ~,. i i i I ~'~ ~ G' ' , P 1 ~ n rn ~ i ' 1 ~. ~ CO I ~ . I I ~ ' . ~. I W , j j ~ ~ - 1 I , ~ ~ 1 c m o. 1 ~. g ~ ~ i i . ~ ~ ~ Y I~ ! i i i I ! i I ~ A i~ a a ~ k I I A ! O - I i I i U! vV 1 o ..h ~. ~ ~ I x m '~ ! ~I ~ i ~~ I I! ~' W ~~ ~ d0 I U 3 .T-t x ! i 1 ~ ~i I 1D O - N N t7 i 1 ,i ~ ~' ~ ro i i a~ n~ o Dac ~ ' rt .~ I '~ ', ' ' u ,A 1 C ~c 1 7 3 C ~ . ~ ', i I Q+ Q O+ p O "1 1 N tp O Z ~ 1 ~ ~ ' ~ 1 m o s' ~ ~ ! ~ ~ I 7 C i m o •~. ~ ~ ~ ~I ! ' n i c 1 - ~ °, ' a, l71 I D n ~ I~ '~ ' ' ~. i, ~ . lfi w W N C O 1 Q a z 3 1 7 7 . i I ~, m p U m I a a m~ ~, i i ~ fV N 1 7 ~' a w ~o I n ~ o~ . ' ., ~ 1 x -i m -1 , i ~ ~ J ,r I ~,v maw ; ~ I -< m 3 o ~ ro ro a 1-r~a a ~ ~ rv ro \~ ~~ ~ ~ i , w a ' 'I ' A ~ A 1 3 C \ D I O y ~ i, ' ~ o ~ N o fV ~~ I N , ~ i ~ ~. o~ ~ "1 ~' i t~ ~~ i ~ O ~ i ' I W J 7 i , ~ '~ I an i ~ I ~ ~ I ~ C ~ ' i ~ ~; ~ .p ~ ~ I a 3 i _ i n m ° ' i ~ ~ ~ ,n ~ ~ . ~ ~ I l ~ i ~ '. A I t0 y ~ 1 ~ ~ I I ' G~ C ~, . ' ~ ~ ~ I C1. i . i ~ i ~ 1 ~ ~ I ~ ~ I ~ i ' d '. I T N ' i ~ I C m i ~ ~ i ' ~ y t~ n x , ' ~ i ~ ~ I N\' C V ' ~ ~ ~ I ', ~ ~ ~~ I ' fA O CY 7 I , ~ ~'~ i ~ . ~~ ~ ~ I ~ I~ I i I I ~ ~ ~ i ~ .o i I -+t a 1 I , i I I '; ~ ; ~ ~ ~ I I i I I ~ ~ o~ ; ~ D D ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ i i ~ ~ -i L7 ~ ~ i ~ i ~ I ~ ~ m m I ~ ~ ~ ~ I i ~ I I I ' ~ ~ ~ -- o ~ ~ i I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i v o I I I I ~ ~ 0 0 I ~ ~ ~ I ~ I ~ , i ` I ~ ~ i i i i ~ ~ . i ' I 1 ! ~ , '~, , i ~'I o E illllllllllllllllilllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll111J ~IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIilllllllll ';~~.1 ~~. - ~, - _ _ E UE ST = PPE ARAN CE R Q _ A _ _ - _ - _ _ _ - _ - _ _ _ _ - AGENDA ITEM NO. _ _ - - -_ SUBJECT , ...~^~ ~ _ - _ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to = _ reco nine me during the public hearing on the above matter = g _ WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, so that I may comment. _ _ I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR _ _ RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINE _ _ - -_ LISTED BELOW. • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment c whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will = decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, ' nforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board #o _ and will e - do otherwise. akers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Ques- • Spe -_ bons of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. _ _ - _ • All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized _ = speaker and audience members is not allowed. • ers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. = Both speak _ • S Bakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments _ __ with the clerk. ___ • INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION - FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO DEPUTY CLE _ ~ = NAME --~ ~/ ~ - ~~ / ~~ / ~`~ ~~ ADDRESS ~ _ _, -, -~ _ .-1 L` PHONE ~ Ililll llllllillllliilil 11111 l llllllllllllllllliilillllllllllllllllllllllllilllllllllllllllllllilllillllill mllillillllillll M E M O RAN D U M TO : Lee B . Eddy ~ . c~ FROM: Don Myers November 13, 1990 DATE: ---- CORTRAN Report --------- SUBJECT: __ ------------ onse to your questions regarding the board This is in resp report on CORTRAN. The costs shown are total annual costs, not additional 1. costs. 2, There are currently 238 individuals who use the service. 3, There is no state or federal subsidy. 4. Yes, the service is provided for the entire county. 5, Yes this more detailed analysis of 6. We can conduct a ear's budget process. However, alternative prior to next y taxis preliminary investigation indicates that using would be more expensive. resent the average number a, From October 1989 Was 12p The approximate cost per of miles per trip er trip, $12.34. Yellow mile was $1.03 and cost p Cab's rate schedule is as follows: $ 2,80 for the first mile 1.40 for each mile thereafter the cost for using a cab for Using this schedule, ared to an average 12-mile trip would be $18.20 comp $12.34 for CORTRAN. the system, including the b, Administration °f would be an additional expense. prevention of abuse, of our CORTRAN clients are be physically unable c, Many to use taxi sere ts. and would continue to nee special arrangemen Carilion charges a flat $40.00 for trips of u~dep 15 miles for a wheelchair va afro s would have cost by one of our handicappedaped to the $12.34 from a minimum of $40.00 comp CORTRAN. Note• In a follow-up conversation with Mr. Curtis Andrews, • Director of the Service Provider, I learned that He Roanoke City also provides service °wasatveaYy•low said the ridership on Saturday averaging about eight 1-way trips. Mr. Andrews says that Saturday service, using one van, could be added to our Alternative 3 for an approximate addition of $3,792.00 per year or a total cost of $80,870.00. cc: Elmer Hodge Board Members ._ /v1 -- ~ R E P O R T SUBJECT: Request for Expansion of CORTRAN Service DATE: November 13, 1990 BACKGROUND' The County's transportation system (CORTRAN) was started in 1985 for the purpose of providing a means of travel for elderly (over age 55) and handicapped citizens. The service is contracted through Unified Human Services Transportation System, Inc. The current level of service is from 9:00 AM - 4:00 PM, Tuesday through Friday. Each qualifying citizen is allowed two one-way trips per day. Current ridership averages 400-500 trips per month. The City of Roanoke provides a similar type of service. The City has its own public transportation system and is federally mandated to provide the same level of service to the handicapped. Consequently, hours of service in the city are from 6:15 AM - 6:15 PM, Monday through Friday. This service is limited to the handicapped, but the elderly are given a discount on the Valley Metro transportation system. Mr. Rich Boehler, 314C Honeywood Lane, SW, addressed the Board at its meeting on October 23, 1990, and requested that the County service be extended to Monday through Friday, 9:00 AM - 6:15 PM. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: At the Board's instruction, the staff has evaluated several alternatives for expanded service and the results are as shown in the table below: Current Roanoke Alternatives Roanoke County City 1 2 3 Days/Week 4 5 5 5 5 Hours of Service: No. of Buses 2 1 2 2 2 Bus #1 9AM-4PM 6:15AM-6:15PM Bus #2 9AM-4PM N/A 9AM-4PM 9AM-6PM 8AM-6PM 9AM-4PM 9AM-6PM 9AM-4PM Annual Costs $58,380 N/A $67,097 $80,739 $77,078 ' ' / ... RECOMMENDATION' Based on conversations with the service provider, Alternative 3 appears to be the most effective in terms of cost and coverage. It is the recommendation of the staff that Alternative 3 be considered as a part of the upcoming budget process for FY 1991- 92. Respectfully submitted, ~. U Don C. Myers, Ass nt County istrator AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 13, 1990 RESOLUTION CERTIFYING EXECUTIVE MEETING WAS HELD IN CONFORMITY WITH THE CODE OF VIRGINIA WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia has convened an executive meeting on this date pursuant to an affirmative recorded vote and in accordance with the provisions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and WHEREAS, Section 2.1-344.1 of the Code of Virginia requires a certification by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that such executive meeting was conducted in conformity with Virginia law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby certifies that, to the best of each members knowledge: 1. Only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements by Virginia law were discussed in the executive meeting which this certification resolution applies, and 2. Only such public business matters as were identified in the motion convening the executive meeting were heard, discussed or considered by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. IIIIIIIIIIIIIilllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllj~J ~IIIIIIillllillllllliilllllllllllllllllllllllillllll ~ , _ - -~ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ NCE REQUEST APPEARA _ - _ - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -_ ITEM NO -_ AGENDA '_ _ ~ ~ SUBJECT ~-- - -_ a Chairman of~he Board of Supervisors to _ I would like th - e durin the public hearing on the above matter = recognize m g omment.WHEN CALLED TO THE PODI sothatlmayc _ _ - VE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR TH _ = I WILL GI _ _ _ AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINE _ RECORD.I _ _ - = LISTED BELOW. • aker will be given between three to five minutes to comment c Each spe s eakin as an individual or representative. 'The k ~n an issue, _ whether p $ = decide the time limit based on the numted bf t to majo~y of he Board #u = and will enforce the rule unless instruc y do otherwise. • will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Ques- = Speakers = bons of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. '~ Debate between a recognized _ • All comments must be directed to the Board. __ speaker and audience members is not allowed. and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. c __ • Both speakers ested to leave any written statements and/or comments c • Speakers are requ with the clerk. NDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED -_ • I P SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION GROU M THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESEN -' FRO c = THEM. _ INT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO DEPUTY CLE PLEASE PR -_ NAME ~.~ ~ ~- . ~ ~ ~ .~ ~ _ . -_ ADDRES = PHONE ~~ G ~' ~~~ ~~ _ 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 mllllllllllllliilllllllllllllllllllllliiil IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII~I~11 ~Illiilillllllllllllllllllllllilllllllill - - _ _ _ ~ _ - - E VEST = PPEARANCE R Q _ A - - - - - - - -_ - ~ - _ ~ _ - r ~~ - - - AGENDA ITEM NO. _ ~~ _ - _ c0.,~ _ -_ SUBJECT ~ - I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to - eco nize me during the public hearing on the above matter c = r g - WHEN CALLED TO THE PODI c = so that I may comment. - I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FORT _ _ _ - RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINE _ - _ _ - = LISTED BELOW. ._ • ker will be iven between three to five minutes to comment _ Each spea g whether speaking as an individual or representative. The kin~n an issue, = decide the time limit based on the number of citizens sp g and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to - - - - - - do otherwise. " __ • S eskers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Ques- -_ tons of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. - • ments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized - All com '" speaker and audience members is not allowed. __ • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. - • • eskers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments Sp __ with the clerk. • INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED ROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION G - FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT - THEM. - LEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO DEPUTY CLE - P _ ~ ~ ASS - NAME ~ ~~ ~ -_ - _ `~ SGIe, V~ - Y~ ADDRESS ~ ~a Ca ~ U 1 nS o~ -_ - Q _ 3 ~y_ _' Cp ~ O c PHONE IIIIIIIIIillilllilillllllllillillllllillillllllllillillliilllllllllllllllllllllllllillllllllllllllll mllllllillllllllllllllll N r , A. LEGAL NOTICE )AWOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPHRVISORS Roanoke County Board of ~~ ~~~~.% :~'~yt_-'' _.~L1'-~~ ~pervisors will hold sPublic / ~ ~9> n~/ ~ wring at 7 P•m. on Tuesday, ~~ ~ ~~ ~'1~_`~'~IL 9/ wember 13, 1990, In the ~ ~. d „ ~mmunltY Room of the ~~ J oanoke County Administra- _ ., /~~~ ~/~ ~-~L~ on Center, 3738 Brambleton a L~~1~_~(,,,. venue, Roanoke, VA, on a' ~ Peclal Exception Request of ~~~-~ 1~~ y ~ n 1 ~ y ~~,~,y_~y w~~ I( _' ie Roanoke Moose Lodge C~nl-~. ~]- d:-C~"`~ -L-!~`" 7~ C / i 484 to operate a shooting ~ /r `~~,~ d Q-iw/ enge at 3433 Catawba Valley ~'..e-~C~ / ~~~~ ~ ~~ hive, in the Catawba Magia- ~ ~~~~~. ,. L,~./ erial District. 1 ,~' i r~-~.'e= , copy of this application is I C.~`" ` .~ / m ~ ,, ~ -~ /~~ ~~~~~J available for Inspection In the ~~" ) ~ ~~ ~/// `~ ///~~~--~~~ )apartment of Planning end I ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ (~- ~[/„~/'~ _O zoning, 3738 Brambleton Ave- ~ ~ ~ ~ / ~~~` 2 !!~~// !~ ,, % we, Roanoke, VA. //~/i1~`I~:/.~-c°",~ `rn/,. ~1 ~/ I dated: October 43, 1990 - J /~ v-~~~~"' Mary H. Allan, Clerk ~ •y1~,. ~~_„ „w~rj~1,~ 13356) li '/rJ ~O"~- ~ ~ ~C~ ",'_ _ ii ~ f ~ J~^°'~' ~ , .; , - - ~, ~ ~ ~~~''`~~.4! ~, ~~'i 1;' ~~~~ /t' !71 G Vim: ~~ ~ t.. - ~ 1.1 ,-y ,4,. ~- ~ ~ ~,~. ~ ~ `t/~.z Jam.,/mot-~cJt, ~. ~-~-",~~ f r V/ 1. '1 1• k, `~~ ~ ~ , ;x;:43-~--~~~-.~.~-~.~ n. ,~ C ~~~ ~- ~~~~.~ ~ ~ Q ~• ~.C,i'Z« ~-~ ,c..z. ,~,.~L yam' ~~ ~ / l~ b ` ~~ ~'~ `, / ~ i, vim" -~ `~ l ~ f; ~-. - j ~' t-~-~`~, ~cu';~c-Bch.-~. ~~ r,k~ ~~~n~~ n~ ~ ~ ~ ~'~ ~ ~~ 1 ~ /~. ~Zl t.~~ , ~ ~~~ : ~~ ~ ~ _' ~r ~ ~ ~'- ~-/< 7~ s % I~ ; L tYl l L.m C` '~' _ l i. ~ 1 {'~~ P'C . G~ `. 1,, 11 G...J l tit.. 7 .Jl l !`~~~~X ~~L~ ~~~ ~"~ . >-`~ ll i~ 7 ~ ,~~ / ~ / // I >v ~ ~c ~E ~. ~~ I / ~~, l ~~~r l ~ +=-= /J 4^ t.~r..~._1l~lit~t~ ~:; t me / 6 r // ~~ J ~ (~ ~., /~ Vii - ~ ~ i ~_~ ~ !~.'t (7Sa~l ~ t,v ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ I~,,~1 ~ ~Il ~.~-,.; ~~~-t _~C~/~rz 1~ -~.~ ~` mac,-~a~Qc~~~~/ ~-~.~ c~~cti~~^~'~- ~ ,~ ~ ~ ,~ ~ ~'~ .~~-Q-~ ~ ~., _~~ ~~~C_ Q ~ t~ ~ , ~_:~ ^. ~ " ~~~-;,~. ,-~ , Cam: -~-,.,ti ,n ~ . r7i 'f~ ~`f ~ .r~ Ir %~ ~~ Fem.' ~L ~ ~ ~; ~ .--~ ~{~' ~' / ~= '~~^ ~ i.. J r=te /' '_" 'v ~ _:~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I i ~f,'l/L.~ ~~ 1. ;,, .~- _ > ~ ~.' 1 r ,~ ~, _: f ! t~: .~,_ ,. ~~ - _ r ~ =. ,~, `;, y~ .,. ... ~, ~ ~ -- .: t ~~~\~ ~:~~a--lam ~l t~1;/\ L!L~'~~Vl,{~~~ `I~.~ 1~~ /! t ~. 4 -'~ ~ + '' ,r~ 1 { ~ 1,/'J•'. ~,,) I .~ '-j) ~' !J t! f / . ~ ~, 1, ) .\_ f r ~ ~ 2 ,,./ J ~..1 ~ 01 ~ ~t'~'%(.:r ~~~.f~ C ,/ \/ ~ J'e`t: ~~ `X ~~'~~ ?1 / ~ ~ r ~~ r u ~V ~ ~~ ~~cl-'~.,c~~-` o, ~-~r-~ ~~--~c~ c~-~`z~/ -gam ~~GZ~n~-- ~~ ~~ ~ ~~~~~~~~ y. ,j y~ j . i t ~. ~ ,. ,. ~•( 1~ ~ y ~ / y ,~ a ~ 'fir jL ~ J ~~ /~ ~~ ~ z ~ G. - ~ - ,. y ~ ~ _. /r ,Cyr c. ~, ~~ ~ {' ~ y L c.1 _ ~ Y ~~~~ ti.. , ~ ~.-~ __~...~ ~ ~' i 1. ~~~` ~ /' ~ ~ _. c -`~~° J 7~ ~~ J ~ /..~>o i/~i/~ /~ ~ C~~ f/~ ,t.. ~ 7 l C ~' ~ ` , r~ ~ - ~ ~ ~, -` ._ ~ ,. ~< < r ~ _ -.~ ~ ! ~i ~ 2 t it'd-/~.; ._ , ~t <~ `~ ,~ ~ ~ ~~~ / ;, ` -; f -~'" ,1 j / ,o : -~'L:l r~ ~ !` /~~~ ti J 1 .r ... , <~ ' . ~ ~,~ ~ ~ ~~ w, '~ ;, l v ~ -~-~'-~ ~.V I ~ y ~JL~ ~ ~ ~ .!~`~ 1 tip-' ~ 7 ll, ] ~C t `L ~~ 2 '~ Y' 1.. ~..c i ~ v ~ ns C, e~ /~ IZaI ~t ~~ ~ y ;; ~ ? ~, / _ ;; / j~ ~ . l ~t.. t. <_ ~ ~ ~~~. ..- ;. < < f . ~.. ~~ ~ ~ { f _ ~'C~~ LCD. ~1~lC`~ ~.(~ ~ a C ~~ ~-S ~- ~ ~ /' ~ . ~ /~ / ~~ ~ ~ C ". . ~ ~ ~. L (, _.~ ~(m,~~= fem. rl ~- ~~ L C.~> ; c [ :.mac ,r ~ ~ ~i~~_~>z.. L' r 7 ;:l O ~j s~- lam. ~c~{. c~-~--" ~"~-~.. r' C n ~~ ~~ C ~,~~ ~,,~ ~ Cap ~ ~ ~ ,~'~~~.~„~ ~~58" C ~) _~ -~ , Y-•- `~ ~%y!.Y-if(i " ~ ~~~~~~. lip ~ f ~Jf ~~.'Y, ~ I ~~ 1 ~' 1 c_r~\.c%: c' r-`C-~...~-°" -~ 4' ~"' ~ `' ~~'3~2~Ci~''~'9.~ C./Yu'~''~~V/1cf ~ / 1~<'` ,~ C , ~ ~,;~~ , .~ l' ~ ~- ~~, r f ~ U Q~..a. Q- ~ ~- q J s -~t-~h. ~_ p~ 4~f,~v ~r,~f;'J,..y-'c~,1~~,~~.~ c~ ~ 4~ir-yc--~~ ~~ f _ _ ~~:ti ~~~, ~.- f ~+ f A .> , ,~, / ~ r l c - rz,c~ ~~,~ . ~ ~ //,/ /, , i 6 ~.` .,` v ~ ,_~; ~ , . ,, _ ~ ~. ~ ~~`~ ~ ~ ~, r, 1 ~.. ~: -~ ~`~LL_ ~' ~~~~ ~~ Lam. ,a - ~~' ~ ~ ~ ~~`=~ ~.~ ~ d~n ~ ~~ ,~ +~ ~ z k~-I G~ /y~ U1 ,~~ v ,. ~ ~~) e i' ~~ ~ "G' ~ - ,,, ~ .- --~ ~ f~ . ~ -y r ~. s 9 /' "~ ~ , _ ~~ ~~ / ~~ ,~ L ~CL~.~it/.X~~n_,tJ~ ,~G~,dc,c~lc~~ j~«,nl~:~ ~Q-C~c.Q_ ~~~ ~' - -%' ~ J ~d ~ .c~z ~r,.~7 b~z~t~ ~~[~ ~~~.CJln:~~f: ~ - _ ,_ L ~,u ~ 7 ~ t ` _~<~-~fY 'f. : -_ ~ . ~J ~~ ~~L 1: ~t .~,~.7 Jj ~ `s /)~~ !{ , G'am` y '~' .(!D f j7i (J t C (~ f ~ ,z i /f' l ~~ ~ ~-4- ~ ; ~- ~~ ~~ x--~{gym ~~t~,~:~=L ~~~ ~~_~~~ ~~ ~~ 0 ~~-~C~-'jT~~rC'uC ~' L ~ ~ Gl ~ [r~!~ ~ ~ ~G ~. r S • h . T~, ~ l ~ (' ,SF ~r' «t L% ~ ~~~ /1 / ~ - l 1, ~ v ~ 3 s- ~~ ~ ~ ,°~,~ !~%~ -~~~, j < ,,~~, ~~ ,~ /~~ ,-a ~~~ ~ ;" T'om' "". ~~'~ ~" ~~. Ea,,~?-~vC J L~ ~~ ~U5 ~ lL i>~ J fiv, ~ ~`' ~ ? ~ ~C .5~~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~~.~~t 3~qS- ~bs ~lv~ 5~,, ~~ 5 .~ ~ ~~~ 11 ~ ~~,,~, !„) ~ ~~ Z ~~ ,~ N e ~ S ~~ ~~ ~ ,~~ ~~ ~ 7 1,~ 1 l~~ /~ %~y gas lay /~ 7 /~.~ ~~U i~v ~~~ /..~? l3~ lay ~J 1.- % ~ %~7 , ` ~~ ~, d ~i~ i4~r~ ~.L/` ¢le~Q ~7~ L^~e"^r.~~ ,~y a C'p -y~ CGI,c. ~"~.~.~ ~~-t,`~~~~ ,i1.C2.~-c ~~'1 ~~t~: ,~2 u=~~c ~,~j C~ ~ ..~~ac r.~,~~ c~ ~ ~ 3 t ~ ~ y~~~~~ O v ~~~ ~~.. ~~ Cat-~~~~~~ ~~'- ~~ ~ q ~~ ~' . ~~~ ~' Z~/,~~,~ ~i~~-~~ ~~~~u ~-~ ~a~~ ~bs~-~~~ ~;~~ J2~1. ~~ y ~ ~ ~,~-~~~~-rr ~~~~~ ~ r~~ .RO x;55 ~ ~~~-~~.~ sP~ ~~~~ ~~~ ~1r ~~'? ~l 3! ~~~ ~ ~~ ~a ~~ ~, ., J ,, i /. / / ~ 17'7 ~~~.~:~~-2~l ~~~~ ,, 3 o aR Cam, v~~- ~~~ , ~~~ :.~ ,~~° jl~/ e~ _ ~ ~ ~ ~. o ~~.~~~-~~~-q y~~'1 a~z~~u~~~ ~,~:~Gt~~~.f~ oar ~~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~~ ~f ~~ j~ ~ 1 y ~ ~~~w~-• ~`~~ 384 ~ ~~!~ p~ . ~ ~ 7 ~2~~ ~ l~ ~ ~ 3a l~ S ~.~~~~~~~ ~~ sue"- c~ VV a,~. VV~ V r ~ 333 ~7 l~ ,N~F~~~ 1~R-~ ~~ l ~~ f ~ ~` ~ ~ ~' ~ ~ ~`~l 1 ~~~` 1 ~1~ 1 ~~ ~ 1 ~" ~ ~ ~` ~ ~ ~o O~ ~aOANp,Y~ ~ ,~ A z ~ ~ z j a ~8 CE505' as SFSOUICEN7ENN~P~ A I3eauti~ulBckinn~n~ COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE All ~MERIG CITY ~~ ~~~ ~~ 1979 ~Y~~ u~ ~~ 1989 November 16, 1990 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS RICHARD W. ROBERS. CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT STEVEN A. MCGRAW. VICE-CHAIRMAN CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT LEE B. EDDY WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT Mary F. Parker, Clerk, Roanoke City Council Forest Jones, Clerk, Salem City Council Carolyn S. Ross, Clerk, Town of Vinton John Williamson, Clerk, Botetourt County Board of Supervisors Dear Ms. Parker, Mr. Jones, Ms. Ross and Mr. Williamson: Attached is a copy of Resolution No. 111390-1 supporting continued regional co~her B a d f Supervisors atltheir meetingsonuTuesdays adopted by November 13, 1990. If you need further information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors bjh Attachment P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24018-0798 (703) 772-2004 ~ pOANp~.~ O ~ A ~ L ti p z o a 18 F~ 88 SFSQUICENTENN~P~ A BcautifulBe~inninK COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE Mr. James L. Trout 4320 Pitzer Road Roanoke, VA 24014 Dear Mr. Trout: November 15, 1990 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS RICHARD W. ROBERS. CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERLAL DISTRICT STEVEN A. MCGRAW, VICE-CHAIRMAN CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT LEE B. EDDY WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRCT This is to advise that at their meeting held on Tuesday, November 13, 1990, the Board of Supervisors voted unanimously to appoint you as a member of the Explore Advisory Committee representing the Vinton Magisterial District from the south side of the Roanoke River. State law provides that any person elected, re-elected, appointed, or re-appointed to any body be furnished a copy of the Freedom of Information Act; your copy is enclosed. We are also sending you a copy of the Conflicts of Interest Act. Both of these acts were amended by the Virginia General Assembly in July, 1989. On behalf of the Supervisors and the citizens of Roanoke County, please accept our sincere thanks and appreciation for your willingness to accept this appointment. Very truly yours, yam„ ~J . Q~c-a~-~~ bjh Enclosures Alt 4MfRItApTr ~ 1' I I'' ~~~~ 1979 1989 Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 (703) 772-2004 OF RCANO~. F Z A o z J- a 18 ~ES~~ 88 S~SaVICENTENN~P~ A Bcnuu ful Bepinnin~ COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE ~ALIYifI~ Af ~~~InIIj~p November 15, 1990 The Honorable Lee B. Eddy, Supervisor Roanoke County Board of Supervisors P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 Dear Mr. Eddy: QL~MFRIGI CITY ('I ~~~ 1979 1989 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS RICHARD W. ROBERS. CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT STEVEN A. MCGRAW. VICE•CHAIRMAN CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT LEE B. EDDY WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERL4L DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT This is to advise that at their meeting held on Tuesday, November 13, 1990, the Board of Supervisors voted unanimously to appoint you as a member of the Recycling Advisory Committee representing the Board of Supervisors. State law provides that any person elected, re-elected a or re-appointed to any body be furnished a co ~ Ppointed, Information Act and a co PY of the Freedom of not attachin co PY of the Conflicts of Interest Act. I am g pies of these acts at this time since you were furnished copies earlier this year. On behalf of the Supervisors and the citizens of Roanoke County, please accept our sincere thanks and appreciation for your willingness to accept this appointment. Very truly yours, ~- Mary H. Allen, Clerk bjh Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Enclosures P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24018-0798 (703) 772.200,4 O~ ~oAND~F ~ ~ ~ ~ z A 0 2 a 18 `.E ~ 88 S~SQUICENTENN~P~ .-~ BeautirulBc~innin~ COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE ~Ll AIMERKJ CITY C~uLtYt ~ 'I I' ~ u~ ,~~ II ~ ~~tu~.~ 1979 1989 Ms. Trixie Averill 4278 Toddsbury Circle Vinton, VA 24179 Dear Ms. Averill: November 15, 1990 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS RICHARD W. ROBERS. CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT STEVEN A. MCGRAW. VICE-CHAIRMAN CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERAL DISTRICT 808 L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT This is to advise that at their meeting held on Tuesday, November 13, 1990, the Board of Supervisors voted unanimously to appoint you as a member of the Explore Advisory Committee representing the Vinton Magisterial District from the north side of the Roanoke River. State law provides that an or re-appointed to any body be furnished a co-elected, appointed, Information Act; your copy is enclosed. We are also esend in om of amendedobyttheCVirginia General AsseAct. g you Both of these acts were fly in July, 1989. On behalf of the Supervisors and the citizens of Roanoke Count please accept our sincere thanks and appreciation for your willingness to accept this appointment. Very truly yours, ~• v Mary H. Allen, Clerk bjh Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Enclosures P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24018-0798 (703) 772-2004 EXPLORE Nominations from Harry Nickens: Trixie Averi]_1 4278 Toddsbury Circle ' Vinton, 24179 890-6519 - NORTH SIDE OF RIVER James L Trout 4320 Pitzer Road Roanoke, Va. 24014 345-6093 - SOUTH SIDE OF RIVER C. W. Church Williams 944 Shelbourne Avenue Vinton, Va. 24179 - VINTON MAG. DISTRICT MEMO - 11/13/90 To: Supervisors Elmer Hodge, Don Myers From: Lee B. Eddy Subject: CORTRAN Report This is my first opportunity to think about the County's CORTRAN service. The following questions and comments are offered in connection with Mr. Myers' report in the 11/13/90 agenda package. 1. I presume the annual costs listed under alternatives 1, 2 and 3 are "total costs" and not "additional costs". 2. How many different individuals use the service (as contrasted with the total number of trips)? 3. Is there a state or federal subsidy? 4. Is this service offered in the outlying rural areas? 5. Does the County Administrator concur in the recommendation? 6. Based on an average of 450 trips per month, the current average cost per trip is approximately $11.00. Has any study been made of a system under which qualifying citizens could use a commercial taxi service? It seems to me that the cost of $11 per trip is more than enough to pay taxi fare for most travel by the elderly or infirm within the metropolitan area. It would certainly be more flexible and convenient for the users. Possible problems might include lack of wheelchair facilities, and preventing fraud and abuse. I should think the taxi companies might be willing to offer a special rate for the privilege of offering this service. If this kind of study has not been done before, and if there are no strong objections, I would like to see an analysis before next year's budget process. MEMO - 11/13/90 To: Supervisors, Elmer Hodge, Mary Allen, Anne Marie Green From: Lee B. Eddy ~ p_, Subject: Resolution on Cooperation - 11/13 Board Meeting For Item C-1 of the agenda, I suggest the following modifications to the resolution: 1. In the 5th "Whereas" clause, change "municipalities" to "local governments." 2. At the top of the 2nd page, strike the first word, "other". 3. At the end of the last "Resolved" clause, add ";and further,". 4. Add a new clause at the end, "BE IT RESOLVED, that a copy of this resolution be transmitted to the respective clerks for the councils of the City of Roanoke, the City of Salem, and the Town of Vinton." AGENDA STAFF MEETING NOVEMBER 6, 1990 1. Introduction and welcome of Masaaki Hasimoto 2. Board of Supervisor meeting of November 13. 3. Resource Authority meeting of November 13. 4. County Administrator Comments REMEMBER TO VOTE LEGAL NOTICE ROANORE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, November 13, 1990, in the Community Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, Roanoke, VA, on a Special Exception Request of the Roanoke Moose Lodge #284 to operate a shooting range at 3233 Catawba Valley Drive, in the Catawba Magisterial District. A copy of this application is available for inspection in the Department of Planning and Zoning, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, Roanoke, VA. Dated: October 23, 1990 ~• Mary H. Allen, Clerk Please publish in the evening edition of the Roanoke Times & World-News Tuesday, October 30, 1990 Tuesday, November 6, 1990 Direct the bill for publication to: Roanoke Moose Lodge #284 P. O. Box 538 Salem, VA 24153 Attn: ~Mr. Al Randolph (703) 384-7172 SEND AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION TO: ROANORE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT P.O. BOX 29800, ROANORE, VA 24018 ~. ' ~. L E G A L N O T I C E Notice is hereby given to all interested persons that by Resolution 91290-7, the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors has amended their meeting schedule for 1990 as follows.: THE MEETING ORIGINALLY SCHEDULED FOR WEDNESDAY NOVEMBER 14 1990 AT 3:00 P.M. AND 7:00 P.M. HAS BEEN RESCHEDULED TO TUESDAY NOVEMBER 13 AT 3:00 P.M. AND 7:00 P.M. Said meeting will take place in the Community Room at the Roanoke County Administration Center, 3738 Brambleton Avenue S. W. Given under my hand this 12th day of October, 1990 Mary H. Allen, Clerk to the Board Roanoke County Board of Supervisors PLEASE PUBLISH IN THE EVENING EDITION OF THE ROANOKE TIMES AND WORK NEWS OrT: TUESDAY, OCTOBER 30, 1990 TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 6, 1990 Direct the Bill for Publication to: Mary H. Allen, Clerk to the Board Roanoke bounty Board of Supervisors P. O. Bow 29800 Roanoke, Va. 24018