Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout12/18/1990 - RegularA N ~, F a ~' .. p 2 18 ~ 88 +E~QUICENTEM~~~` ~ Be~ru~ulBtR+ww~~g (~nunf~ of ~nttnnlce ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ACTION AGENDA DECEMBER 18, 1990 All-AMERICA CRY i ~~9~8~9 Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meeting.. Regular meetings are held on the second Tuesday and the fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public hearings are held at 7:00 p.m on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. THERE WILL BE AN ORGANIZATIONAL MEETING ON THURSDAY, JANUARY 3, 1991 AT 9:00 A.M. A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.) 1. Roll Call. ALL PRESENT AT 3:05 P.M. 2. Invocation: The Reverend Sam Crews Coopers Cove Baptist Church 3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag. B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS i C. PROCIAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS, AND AWARDS 1. State of the County message by Chairman Robers ECH INTRODUCED SIM EWING, UVA CENTER FOR PUBLIC SERVICE WHO CONDUCTED PEER ~ STUDY D. NEW BUSINESS 1. Report on Roanoke County audit for year ended June 30, 1990. A-121890-1 LBE MOTION TO APPROVE STAFF RECOMII~NDATION WITH GOAL STATEMENT AT 6.15% - NO VOTE HCN SUBST MOTION TO ADOPT 6.25% GOAL STATEMENT AND THAT S F~~ BACK CREEK FIRE ~ON BE ALLOCATED FROM MAY FUND ( ), CAPITAL FUND 4u ($6,98'n AND BALANCE FROM .6d ~. ~''~'u~ ~~ AYES-SAM,HCN, RWR ~,,~-,s, S~Y~ ~~~ NAYS-LBE,BLJ BLJ MOTION TO APPROVE STAFF RECOMII~NDATION ALLOCATING SCHOOL OPERATING FUND URC 2. Request for appropriation to complete construction of the Back Creek Fire Station. A-121890-2 LBE MOTION TO APPROVE FUNDING AS EXPLAINED BY HCN IN ITEM D-1 URC 2 BLJ ASKED FOR SIX MONTH REPORT ON FIRE STATION 3. Authorization to enter into a Memorandum of Understanding between the Blue Ridge Soil and Water Conservation District and the County of Roanoke. A-121890-3 WIlVTON SHELOR AND DAVE JEI~TNINGS, CONSERVATION SPECIALIST, SPOKE HCN MOTION TO APPROVE URC E. REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS 1. Request to schedule budget work sessions and public hearings regarding the 1991-92 budget. BLJ MOTION TO SET WORK SESSIONS AND PUBLIC HEARINGS UW BLJ ASKED THAT PUBLIC HEARING BE ADEQUATELY ADVERTISED F. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Request for public hearing on January 22, 1991 to elicit citizen comment on prohibiting discrimination in places of public accommodation in Roanoke County. HCN MOTION TO SET PUBLIC HEARING ON 1/22/91 UW 2. Request for public hearing on January 22, 1991 to elicit citizen comment on the 1991-92 budget. BLJ MOTION TO SET PUBLIC HEARING ON 1/22/91 3 UW 3. Request for public hearing on January 22, 1991 to elicit citizen comment on the process of redistricting. BIB MOTION TO SET PUBLIC HEARING ON 1/22/91 UW G. REQUEST FOR PUBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING FOR REZONING ORDINANCE -CONSENT AGENDA 1. Ordinance to rezone approximately 78 acres from A-1 to R-2 to expand the Orchards Subdivision, located north of US Route 460, west side of Alternate Route 220, Hollins Magisterial District upon the petition of F&W Community Development Corporation. BI.~T TO APPROVE 1ST READING 2ND AND PUBLIC HEA][ZING ON 1/22/91 URC H. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance authorizing acceptance and acquisition of surplus real estate adjacent to Fort Lewis Elementary School and authorizing corneyance to the Commonwealth of Virginia. SAM TO APPROVE 1ST READING MOTION WITHDRAWN PMM TO GET ADDITIONAL INFORMATION LBE MOTION TO CON7L'INUE 1ST READING - 1/8/91 URC I. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 4 J. APPOINTMENTS 1. Board of Zoning Appeals 2. Building Code Board of Adjustments and Appeals 3. Grievance Panel 4. Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission 5 Planning Commission HCN NOMINATED KYLE ROBINSON 7'O SERVE ANOTHER 4-YEAR TERM 6. Recycling Advisory Committee LBE NOMINATED APRIL YOW AS BUSINESS REPRESENTATIVE K. CONSENT AGENDA ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY. BLJ MOTION TO ADOPT RESO WITH YTEMS 4 AND 5 REMOVED FOR SEPARATE VOTE URC BLJ MOTION TO APPROVE ITEMS 4 AND 5 AYES-LBE,BLJ,HCN,RWR ABSTAIN-SAM s R-121890-4 1. Approval of Minutes - November 13, 1990, November 26, 1990, November 30, 1990. 2. Confirmation of Committee Appointments to the Grievance Panel, Library Board, and the Recycling Advisory Committee, and ratification of appointment to Mental Health Services of the Roanoke Valley Board of Directors. A-121890-4.a 3. A-121890-4.b 4. Approval of 50/50 Raffle Permit for Roanoke County School Food Service Chapter. Approval of 1991 Bingo permit for Loyal Order of Moose Lodge #284. A-121890-4.c BLJ MOTION TO APPROVE AYES-LBE~LJ,HCN,RWR ABSTAIN-SAM 5. Approval of 50/50 Raffle Permit for Loyal Order of Moose Lodge #284. A-121890-4.d BLJ MOTION TO APPROVE AYES-LBE,BLJ,HCN,RWR ABSTAIN-SAM S. Acceptance, discontinuance and abandonment of portions of Route 692, route 689, and Route 690 in the Va. Department of Transportation Secondary System. 6 A-121890-4.e 7. Acceptance of 0.24 mile of Fairway Estate, 0.11 mile of Viking Drive, 0.12 mile of Norseman Drive, 0.14 mile of Chippenham Drive, 0.05 mile of Shrewsbury Court, 0.18 mile of Brentwood Court, 0.12 mile of Kingsmill Drive, 0.10 mile of Mill Pond Dr. into VDOT Secondary System. A-121890-4.f 8. Acceptance of water and sanitary sewer facilities serving Buck Run Apartments. A-121890-4.g 9. Request for acceptance of Henry Farms Road into the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System. R-121890-4.h 10. Request for acceptance of Hollins Court Drive into the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System. R-121890-4.i 11. Request from Virginia Department of Transportation for changes in the Secondary System due to the relocation and reconstruction of Bradshaw Road. R-121890-4.J 12. Adoption of resolution with respect to the Roanoke County Resource Authority landfill financing. R-121890-4.k 13. Appraval of 50/50 Raffle Permit for the Women of the Moose Chapter 1022. A-121890-4.1 L. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS SUPERVISOR EDDY: (1) ASKED FOR REPORT ON # OF DOGS THAT MAY BE KEPT IN RESIDENCE. ECH TO REPORT BACK IN JANUARY. (2) ASKED FOR UPDATE ON "NO LEFT TURN" SIGNS AT MUDLICK AND GRANDIN ROAD. ECH TO CHECK WITH ROANOKE CITY AND REPORT BACK. SUPERVISOR. MCGRAW: (1) VACO BOARD OF DIRECTORS MET LAST WEEK AND WILL MEET 1/23/90. 'THE GRAYSON COMII~IISSION TASK FORCE WILL STUDY HB 550 AND ASK FOR DELAY AT 1991 GENERAL ASSEMBLY. SUPERVISOR ROBERS: ASKED CLERK TO DRAFT A LETTER FROM BOARD OF SUPERVISORS TO RABBI FOX AND NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF CHRISTIANS AND JEWS CONDEMNING DESECRATION OF JEWISH CEMETERY LAST WEEK. M. CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COI~BViLTNICATIONS NONE N. REPORTS BLJ MOTION TO RECEIVE AND FILE UW 1. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance 2. General Fund Unappropriated Balance s 3. Board Contingency Fund 4. Statement of income and expenses for the five months ended November 30, 1990 5. Accounts Paid -October 1990 6. Accounts Paid -November 1990 O. EXECUTIVE SESSION pursuant to the Code of Virginia section 2.1-344 A (1) to consider a personnel matter. regarding the Social Services Department and (7) litigation with Fralin and Waldron HCN MOTION AT 4:10 P.M. URC P. CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE SESSION R-121890-5 RWR MOTION AT 4:35 P.M. NEW BUSINESS R-121890-6 BI{T MOTION TO ADOPT RESOLUTION OPPOSING CURRENT STATE COST REDUCTION PROGRAM IN SOCIAL SERVICES URC RECESS AT 4:38 EVENING SESSION (7:00 P.M.) 9 Q. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS AND AWARDS 1. Resolution of Appreciation to Wayland Winstead for his service on the Planning Commission. R-121890-7 HCN TO ADOPT RESO - URC WAYLAND WINSTEAD PRESENT TO RECEIVE R. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1290-1 Petition of Roanoke Moose Lodge #284 to obtain a Special Use Permit to operate a shooting range in the Catawba Magisterial District. (COriTINUED FROM NOVEMBER 13, 1990. THIS PETITION HAS BEEN WITHDRAWN AT THE PETITIONER'S REQUEST.) WITHDRAWN 1290-2 Petition of Rajesh Desai to obtain a Special Exception Permit to operate a home for adults located at 7656 Williamson Road in the Hollins Magisterial District. A-121890-8 ' HCN MOTION TO APPROVE WITH CONDITIONS AYES-LBE,SAM,HCN,RWR ABSTAIN-BLJ ONE PERSON SPOKE IN OPPOSITION 1290-3 Petition of Robert Woodward for a Special Exception Permit to permit the sale of used cars on the premises at 3306 Brambleton Avenue in the Cave Spring Magisterial District. A-121890-9 LBE MOTION TO DENY URC io THREE SPOKE IN OPPOSITION S. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1290-4 Ordinance to rezone 1.301 acres from R-1 to R-3 to allow apartments located on Feather Road at VA 24, Vinton Magisterial District, upon the petition of W. E. Cundiff. (CONTINUED FROM OCTOBER 23, 1990.) 0-121890-10 HCN MOTION TO DENY URC FIVE SPOKE IN OPPOSITION 1290-5 Ordinance to rezone approximately 12.3 acres from R-1 to R-E to allow a golf course, located along Wolf Creek Between Hardy Road and VA Route 24, Vinton Magisterial District upon the petition of Steve Brawn. (CON'rINiJED FROM OCTOBER 23, 1990) 0-121890-11 HCN MOTION TO APPROVE URC 1290-6 Ordinance to rezone 7.8 acres from R-1 to R-3 to construct townhouses, located on Hardy Road near Wolf Creek, Vinton Magisterial District upon the petition of Steve Brawn. 0-121890-12 HCN MOTION TO APPROVE URC 1290-7 Ordinance amending and reenacting Chapter 4, Amusements, Section 4-99, "Bingo Games and Raffles", of ii the Roanoke County Code providing for an increase in the Audit Fee. (CONTII~TUED FROM DECEMBER 4, 1990) ONE PERSON SPOKE IN OPPOSITION HCN MOTION TO CONTINUE TO 1/22/91 PMM TO WORK WITH COMNIISSIONER OF REVENUE ON GATHERING INFO AYES-SAM,BLJ,HCN,RWR NAYS-LBE 1290-8 Ordinance to amend the 1985 Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan by incorporating into the plan the analysis, conclusions and recommendations contained in the September 1990 Roanoke River Corridor Study. 0-121890-13 HCN MOTION TO APPROVE • URC 1290-9 Ordinance to rezone 0.67 acre from B-1 to B-2 to operate a restaurant, located at 7770 Williamson Road, Hollins Magisterial District, upon the petition of Hollins College Corporation. 0-121890-14 BHT MOTION TO APPROVE URC 1290-10 Ordinance vacating a 25 foot right-of~vay known as "Dallas Road" Shawn on map of Otterview Gardens Subdivision. 0-121890-15 HCN MOTION TO APPROVE URC is 1290-11 Ordinance vacating the eastern six foot portion of a 12 foot public utility easement located on Lot 20, Block 10, Section 3, Beverly Heights North Subdivision. 0-121890-16 SAM MOTION TO APPROVE URC • 1290-12 Ordinance extending the franchise of Cox Cable Roanoke, Inc. to operate a cable television system in Roanoke County for a period of 60 days. 0-121890-17 SAM MOTION TO APPROVE URC T. CITIZENS' COMII~NTS AND C011~IlVIU1vICATIONS BLJ REQUESTED EXECUTIVE SESSION ON 1/3/91 FOLLOWING ORGANIZATIONAL MEETING TO DISCUSS F`RALIN AND WALDRON Iaw svrr. Q. ADJOUrRNMENT HCN MOTION AT 9:25 P.M. UW 13 AN ~r ~P -. 9 Z 18 ~ 88 +EB~UICENTENN~'~ ~ Bt~ru~ulBt~m.~.g eu.u~~~ cm C~Ulirifl~ 11f ~QMnIIkF ~ ~ ~' ~ ~~9'8'9 ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA DECEMBER 18, 1990 Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meeting. Regular meetings are held on the second Tuesday and the fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public hearings are held at 7:00 p.m on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. THERE WII~L BE AN ORGANIZATIONAL MEETING ON THURSDAY, JANUARY 3, 1991 AT 9:00 A.M. A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.) 1. Roll Call. 2. Invocation: The Reverend Sam Crews Coopers Cove Baptist Church 3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag. B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS C. PROCIAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS, AND AWARDS 1. State of the County message by Chairman Robers i D. NEW BUSINESS 1. Report on Roanoke County audit for year ended June 30, 1990. ' 2. Request for appropriation to complete construction of the Back Creek Fire Station. 3. Authorization to enter into a Memorandum of Understanding between the Blue Ridge Soil and Water Conservation District and the County of Roanoke. E. REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS 1. Request to schedule budget work sessions and public hearings regarding the 1991-92 budget. F. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Request for public hearing on January 22, 1991 to elicit citizen comment on prohibiting discrimination in places of public accommodation in Roanoke County. 2. Request for public hearing on January 22, 1991 to elicit citizen comment on the 1991-92 budget. 3. Request for public hearing on January 22, 1991 to elicit citizen comment on the process of redistricting. G. REQUEST FOR PUBLIC ~[EARING AND FIRST READING FOR REZONING ORDINANCE -CONSENT AGENDA 1. Ordinance to rezone approximately 78 acres from A-1 to R-2 to expand the Orchards Subdivision, located north of US Route 460, west side of Alternate Route 220, Hollins 2 Magisterial District upon the petition of F&W Community Development Corporation. H. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance authorizing acceptance and acquisition of surplus real estate adjacent to Fort Lewis Elementary School and authorizing Conveyance to the Commonwealth of Virginia. I. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES J. APPOINTMENTS 1. Board of Zoning Appeals 2. Building Code Board of Adjustments and Appeals 3. Grievance Panel 4. Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission 5, Planning Commission 6. Recycling Advisory Committee K. CONSENT AGENDA ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE 3 CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY. 1. Approval of Minutes - November 13, 1990, November 26, 1990, November 30, 1990. 2. Confirmation of Committee Appointments to the Grievance Panel, Library Board, and the Recycling Advisory Committee, and ratification of appointment to Mental Health Services of the Roanoke Valley Board of Directors. • 3. Approval of 50/50 Raffle Permit for Roanoke County School Food Service Chapter. 4. Approval of 1991 Bingo Permit for Loyal Order of Moose Lodge #284. 5. Approval of 50/50 Raffle Permit for Loyal Order of Moose Lodge #284. 6. Acceptance, discontinuance and abandonment of portions of Route 692, Route 689, and Route 690 in the Va. Department of Transportation Secondary System. 7= Acceptance of 0.24 mile of Fairway Estate, 0.11 mile of Viking Drive, 0.12 mile of Norseman Drive, 0.14 mile of Chippenham Drive, 0.05 mile of Shrewsbury Court, 0.18 mile of Brentwood Court, 0.12 mile of Kingsmill Drive, 0.10 mile of Mill Pond Dr. into VDOT Seondary System. 8. Acceptance of water and sanitary sewer facilities serving Buck Run Apartments. 9. Request for acceptance of Henry Farms Road into the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System. 4 10. Request for acceptance of Hollins Court Drive into the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System. 11. Request from Virginia Department of Transportation for changes in the Secondary System due to the relocation and reconstruction of Bradshaw Road. 12. Adoption of resolution with respect to the Roanoke County Resource Authority landfill financing. 13. Approval of 50/50 Raffle Permit for the Women of the Moose Chapter 1022. L. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS M. CITIZENS' COMII~NTS AND CO1bIlVIUNICATIONS N. REPORTS 1. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance 2. General Fund Unappropriated Balance 3. Board Contingency Fund 4. Statement of income and expenses for the five months ended November 30, 1990 5. Accounts Paid -October 1990 5 6. Accounts Paid -November 1990 O. EXECUTIVE SESSION pursuant to the Code of Virginia section 2.1-344 A (1) to consider a personnel matter. P. CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE SESSION EVENING SESSION (7:00 P.M.) Q. PROCIAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS AND AWARDS 1. Resolution of Appreciation to Wayland Winstead for his service on the Planning Commission. R PUBLIC HEARINGS 1290-1 Petition of Roanoke Moose Lodge #284 to obtain a Special Use Permit to operate a shooting range in the Catawba Magisterial District. (COriTINUED FROM NOVEMBER 13, 1990. THIS PETITION HAS BEEN WITHDRAWN AT THE PETITIONER'S REQUEST.) 1290-2 Petition of Rajesh Desai to obtain a Special Exception Permit to operate a home for adults located at 7656 Williamson Road in the Hollins Magisterial District. 1290-3 Petition of Robert Woodward for a Special Exception Permit to permit the sale of used cars on the premises at 3306 Brambleton Avenue in the Cave Spring Magisterial District. 6 S. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1290-4 Ordinance to rezone 1.301 acres from R-1 to R-3 to allow apartments located on Feather Road at VA 24, Vinton Magisterial District, upon the petition of W. E. Cundiff. (COriTINUED FROM OCTOBER 23, 1990.) 1290-5 Ordinance to rezone approximately 12.3 acres from R-1 to R-E to allow a golf course, located along Wolf Creek Between Hardy Road and VA Route 24, Vinton Magisterial District upon the petition of Steve Brawn. (CONTINUED FROM OCTOBER 23, 1990) 1290-6 Ordinance to rezone 7.8 acres from R-1 to R-3 to construct townhouses, located on Hardy Road near Wolf Creek, Vinton Magisterial District upon the petition of Steve Brawn. 1290-7 Ordinance amending and reenacting Chapter 4, Amusements, Section 4-99, "Bingo Games and Raffles", of the Roanoke County Code providing for an increase in the Audit Fee. (CONTINUED FROM DECEMBER 4, 1990) 1290-8 Ordinance to amend the 1985 Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan by incorporating into the plan the analysis, conclusions and recommendations contained in the September 1990 Roanoke River Corridor Study. 1290-9 Ordinance to rezone 0.67 acre from B-1 to B-2 to operate a restaurant, located at 7770 Williamson Road, Hollins Magisterial District, upon the petition of Hollins College Corporation. 1290-10 Ordinance vacating a 25 foot right-of~vay known as "Dallas Road" shown on map of Ottetview Gardens Subdivision. 1290-11 Ordinance vacating the eastern six foot portion of a 12 foot public utility easement located on Lot 20, Block 10, Section 3, Beverly Heights North Subdivision. 1290-12 Ordinance extending the franchise of Cox Cable Roanoke, Inc. to operate a cable television system in Roanoke County for a period of 60 days. T. CITIZENS' COMI~~NTS AND CO1bIlVIUIVICATIONS Q. ADJOi;1RNMENT • s ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER ~ "'-I AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: December 18, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: State of the County Message COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION Chairman Richard W. Robers has requested time on the agenda to present his State of the County message for 1990. ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Eddy Received ( ) Johnson Ref erred ( ) McGraw To ( ) Nickens Robers ACTION NO. AMENDED 12/28/90 A-121890-1 ITEM NUMBER ~ '~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: December 18, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: Presentation of Roanoke County Audit for the Year Ended June 30, 1990 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENT(~S: ~ Q ,p %~ ~/~~ ~~ '~~-~cw2~ BACKGROUND' The County staff would like to present the audited Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the County of Roanoke for the year ended June 30, 1990. KPMG Peat Marwick performed the independent audit and presented the County with a clean opinion. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: As a result of operations for the year ended June 30, 1990, the County generated additional funds of $3,000,000. The table on page 3 shows the source of these $3,000,000. Increased personal property taxes accounted for $1,013,434. Increased real estate taxes accounted for $519,465. In total, General Fund revenues realized $2,781,989 more than budget. It is important to note that expenditures were underspent by only 0.71. This indicates that the departmental budgets have been minimized while still running the existing programs at the current level. This $3,000,000 addition to fund balance brings our undesignated fund balance at June 30, 1990 to $5,653,756 or 8.57 of General Fund expenditures. The table on page 5 shows that this is a healthy addition to our fund balance which has increased for each of the last five years. However, it should be noted that during the current fiscal year the fund balance will be decreasing. At December 18, 1990 our fund balance has been reduced to $4,279,099 or 6.26% of General Fund expenditures. 1 ~-/ cc: The revenues that were projected for the 1990-91 fiscal year are believed to be accurate. It is not anticipated that there will be a large amount of funds remaining from the 1990-91 operations with which to bolster our fund balance. In addition, the School Operating Fund had an excess of $91, 764 for the year. The attached motion from the School Board requests that this excess be rolled over as follows: $45,882 for gasoline, $22,941 for instructional, and $22,941 for maintenance. The 1990- 91 school budget included gasoline computed at 75~ per gallon. Since then, the cost has gone to around $1.00 per gallon. The instructional and maintenance accounts were cut to bare minimum during the budget process and would benefit from this small relief. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends: 1. Accepting the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the County of Roanoke for the year ended June 30, 1990. 2. Appropriating the following amounts resulting from 1990-91 operations: County General Fund - Unappropriated Balance $3,000,000 School Operating Fund - Gasoline 45,882 - Instructional 22,941 - Maintenance 22,941 3. Adopting a goal statement to maintain the General Fund Unappropriated Balance at a minimum of 6.25 of 1990-91 General Fund expenditures which is $4,269,400. Respectfully submitted, iV c,Ck/rte~ ~ ~iC_ T,G~' Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance Approved by, ~~~ ~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ------------ ------------------------------- ACTION --------------------- VOTE Approved (x ) Motion by: S ~ bs ; t-utP Mnt; ~n No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Harm C'_ ty;~-kPn 6_~5~ ~ to a~n~Z Eddy x Received ( ) goal statement _ and that funds Johnson x Referred ( ) for Back Creek Fire Station be McGraw x To ( ) allocated from Unapprop.Balance Nickens x Fund ($9,700), Capital Fund Robers x ($6,987), and balance from Bd Conting Fund ($5,574) (2) Motion by Bob L. Johnson to approve staff recommendation allocating school operating fund - URC File Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance Reta Busher, Director, Management & Budget John Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator John Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator Don Myers, Assistant County Administrator ~" COIINTY OF ROANORE, VIRGINIA RESIILTS OF OPERATIONS (AIIDITED) GENERAL FUND FOR THE YEAR ENDED JIINE 30, 1990 Revenues Real Property Taxes Personal Property Taxes Local Sales and Use Taxes Business License Taxes Consumer Utility Taxes All Other Revenues Expenditures (Including Rollovers) VARIANCE BUDGET ACTUAL AMOUNT PERCENT $28,511,770 11,650,000 4,200,000 2,100,000 1,400,000 16,318,321 64,180,091 $29,031,235 $ 519,465 12,663,434 1,013,434 4,421,952 221,952 2,381,242 281,242 1,517,424 117,424 16,946.793 628,472 66,962,080 2,781,989 1.82% 8.70% 5.28% 13.39% 8.39% 3.85% 4.33% (67,326,499) (66,851,529) 474,970 Use of Fund Balance and Change in Reserve 3,146.408 2,889.449 L256,959) Additional Funds From 1989-90 -0- 3,000,000 3,000,000 -0.71% 3 rt1 COUNTY OF ROANORE, VIRGINIA GENERAL FUND UNAPPROPRIATED BALANCE ~ of General~l~ Amount Fund Expenditures Unaudited Balance at July 1, 1990 $2,653,756 Additional funds from 1989-90 operations 3,000,000 5,653,756 7/1/90 Amount reimbursed by County Schools 9/25/90 Appropriation to Police Department 9/25/90 Rescinding Parks and Recreation User Fees 11/13/90 Allied Signal 11/13/90 Read Mountain Fire Station 12/4/90 VDOT Matching Funds 12/4/90 Legal Fees for Dixie Caverns 12/4/90 Expansion of CORTRAN Service Balance as of December 18, 1990 500,000 (200,000) (85,421) (875,000) (174,886) (347,500) (186,850) (5,000) $4,279,099 6.26 ~1~ General Fund expenditures are budgeted at $68,310,395 for 1990-91. 4 e ~ 1 COUNTY OF ROANORE, VIRGINIA UNDESIGNATED FUND BALANCES Undesignated Fund Balance at June 30, 1986 Undesignated Fund Balance at June 30, 1987 Undesignated Fund Balance at June 30, 1988 Undesignated Fund Balance at June 30, 1989 Undesignated Fund Balance at June 30, 1990 $1,584,637 3.16% $2,063,493 3.87% $3,037.141 5.32% $4,038,318 6.93% $5,653,756 8.57% Undesignated Fund Balance at December 18, 1990 $4,279,099 6.26% 5 ~anN~, F ~. ~ a Z c~ i a OFFICE OF DIVISION SUPEIgINTENDENT ROANOKE COUNTY SCHOOLS 526 SOUTH COLLEGE AVENUE SALEM. VIRGINIA 24153 FROM THE MINUTES OF THE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD OF ROANOKE IN REGULAR SESSION ON DECEMBER 6, 1990 AT 7 P.M. IN THE THE SCHOOL ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, SALEM, VIRGINIA. RE: 1989-90 OPERATING FUND BALANCE ~~ COUNTY MEETING BOARD ROOM OF Mrs. Diane Hyatt, director of finance, reported a balance of $91,764.27 in the 1989-90 school operating budget. On recommendation of Superintendent Wilson, and on motion of Mrs. Pafford and duly seconded, the board directed that $45,882.13 be credited to the gasoline account; $22,941.07 be credited to the instructional account; and $22,941.07 be credited to the maintenance account. TESTEr-, ~` %jl~:~ . ~ <'~L ~%__ Clerk ~~ L AMENDED 12/28/90 ACTION # A-121890-2 ITEM NUMBER ~ ~- ~-' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: December 18, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: Funding to Complete Construction of Back Creek Fire and Rescue Station COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~~ SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Funding in the amount of $300,000 was included in the 1985 Bond Referendum to construct a sub-station in the Back Creek area of Roanoke County. This station was intended to be a satellite operation of Company 3 - Cave Spring. The facility plan included a single fire engine bay, office, bathrooms, and storage area. Since that time a 35 member volunteer fire company was formed and trained. With that inception, the scope of the project changed drastically. Changes were made to 'include two additional fire engine bays, offices for fire and rescue, kitchen, lounge, bathrooms, showers, additional storage, meeting/training room, and sleeping areas. After site preparation, well drilling and architect/engineer fees, there was $253,000 left in the project funds. The project was then bid, and the proposals that were received exceeded the budgeted amount by almost $150,000 making the project cost approximately $450,000. After this, the architect was directed to redesign the project using a pre-fab metal and brick building. The base bid only included two equipment bays, offices, bathrooms, kitchen, and meeting/training room. Also, alternate bids were requested for one additional equipment bay, and a 3500 square foot second floor shell that could be finished at a later date. The low base bid received was $267,990 not including $47,000 for site work, architect/engineer fees, and well drilling. The additional bay cost was $22, 250 and the second story shell cost was $38,900. .~ - On March 28, 1989 the Board approved the construction bid to include the second story shell. This brought the total project cost to $353,890. It was hoped that the volunteers would be able to raise the additional funds required to complete the original scope of the project. However, the volunteers efforts have fallen short and they have requested that the County appropriate $25,261 to complete the project. (for cost breakdown see Attachment 1) The volunteer department has .implemented duty groups to provide for immediate response to emergency calls. This system divides the volunteers into five or six duty teams who rotate the responsibility for immediate response to all calls in a given time period. Duty groups alleviate the necessity for all volunteers to be on standby and gives them more flexibility in their personal life. It is also part of the retirement incentive. The duty groups are required to stay at the station until 11:00 pm and Chief Thomas anticipates that over 75% of the groups would sleep over if sufficient facilities were available. There are currently four fire and rescue facilities that do not have sleeping quarters with Back Creek being the only one that does not have showers. Also, Back Creek is the only one of these organizations that has duty groups and the only one that has expressed an interest in having facilities to allow for sleeping over.(see Attachment 2) Staff feels that in order to maintain the volunteer interest and to continue an immediate response capability that this project be given top priority. Board approval will provide the necessary funds to complete the original scope of the project, less an equipment bay, at a cost of $379,151. This is considerable savings over the original bid of $450,000. This will provide the same functional areas for volunteer activities as found in the majority of our current stations. Also, funding for stations that currently have no sleeping areas has been prioritized in the Bond Improvement Plan presently being prepared. ALTERNATIVES AND IMPACTS: 1. Appropriate $25,261 with the understanding that the second floor plan to include: sleeping quarters, showers, lounge, offices and storage area be completed. 2. Defer to 1991-92 budget process. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends alternative 1. SUBMITTED BY: ~L - APPROVED: T. C. Fuqua Elmer C. Hodge, Jr. Fire Chief County Administrator ------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved (x) Motion by: Lee B. Eddy motion No Yes Abs Denied ( ) to approve funding as expl~in~ddy ~_ Received ( ) ed by Harry C. Nickens in Johnson -~ Referred Item D-1 (See below) McGraw ~ To Nickens ~_ Robers ~ HCN substitute motion to adopt 6.25 goal statement and that funds for Back Creek Fire Station be allocated from Unappropriated Balance Fund ($9,700), Capital Fund ($6,987) and balance from Board Contingency Fund ($5,574). AYES - McGraw, Nickens, Robers NAYS - Eddy, Johnson cc: File T. C. Fuqua, Fire Chief Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance Reta Busher, Director, Management & Budget ATTACHMENT 1 BACK CREEK FIRE STATION PROJECT COST BREAKDOWN ~ -,Z Walls finish and paint $ 1,000 Lay-in Grid Ceiling purchase and install $ 4,070 HVAC purchase one (1) unit, accessories and install. (one unit donated) $ 3,000 Plumbing purchase and install fixtures, faucets and four (4) toilet petitions $ 3,500 Interior Doors & purchase and install Hardware fifteen (15) $ 3,375 Wiring finish, purchase and install receptacles and covers $ 2,000 Lighting purchase and install thirty-two (32) $ 1,600 Water Cooler purchase and install one (1) $ 331 Flooring and Covering purchase and install underlayment, carpet, tile, vinyl base (est. $15 sq. yd. - commercial grade) 6 385 TOTAL $25,261 n ~~j r~,. p ~O 00 J O~ tli ~ W N o ~ Z a, ~b "ti ~, ~ a ~ ~ ~' ~ o ~ ~ ~o ~ w. ~ °+ ~ ~d ~ x ° ~ ~ ~' ~ ~ o ~• ~ coo 0 0 ~ ~ ~ o ~ o ~ ~ N ~ y ~ ~ ~ N ~ o ~ ~ ~ coo ' O O O O O O ~ ~ y d G `C ~ A (D ti z~ N z z z W z~ z z a a a a a a s c~ ~ ~' w ~ ~ ~ ~ a~ a a~~ a~ a a r 0 O pr ~m m z z~ O d `~ 'G ~ b r~ z~ ~~ p~ ~O C~ O a x m z r~'-~ • `i ACTION NO. A-121890-3 ITEM NUMBER °..'~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: December 18, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: Authorization to Execute a Memorandum of Understanding with the Blue Ridge Soil and Water Conservation District. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR' S COMMENTS : ,r„~,.,,~ ~~'`~~'^'"' 7i2 ~~~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ -~ SUMMARY F INF~ TI~ON Attached is a draft Memorandum of Understanding between Roanoke County and the Blue Ridge Soil and Water Conservation District. The County has been involved in the program for a number of years and we include a yearly allocation of $1,000 to this organization. This memorandum will formalize our relationship with the Blue Ridge Soil and Water Conservation District by execution of an agreement. FISCAL IMPACT' None. $1,000 budget allocation was approved for 1990-91. RECOMMENDATION' Staff recommends that the County Administrator be authorized to execute the attached Memorandum of Understanding after review by the County Attorney. Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- Approved (x) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) ACTION Motion by: Harry C. Nickens t0 approve VOTE No Yes Abs Eddy x Johnson x McGraw x Nickens x Robers x cc: File Paul Mahoney, County Attorney MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING ~ .- BETWEEN THE BLUE RIDGE SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT AND THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA This Memorandum of Understanding was entered into this day of 1990 by and between the COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA, hereinafter called the County, and the BLUE RIDGE SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT, Commonwealth of Virginia, hereinafter called the District. Recognizing the need for close working relationships in carrying out the responsibilities for which each is charged, the County and District enter into this Memorandum of Understanding as the foundation for an enduring cooperative working relationship. Such cooperation allows joint effort in the solution of problems relating to the planning and development of soil, water and related natural resources in Franklin, Henry, and Roanoke Counties. The District will make technical assistance available as requested by the County. This assistance as set forth below will be provided by federal, state and local resource agencies which work through the District, within the limitations of their budgets, availability of personnel and in accordance with established policies for reimbursement of certain costs. THE DISTRICT AGREES T0: 1. Provide available basic natural resource data, such as soil surveys, inventories, of potential water impoundment sites, outdoor recreation suitability appraisals, etc. 2. Provide interpretations of soils for various uses. 3. Assist in the development of policies, ordinances, and programs for the conservation of soil, water and related natural resources. 4. Review, and comment on plans which will impact on soil, water and related resources. Inspect the application of such plans and report the progress to the County Subdivision Officer as budget and personnel availability will permit. 5. Assist in developing and conducting training programs for carrying out an effective erosion and sediment control program. 6. Assist the County with an annual review of the effectiveness of the local erosion and sediment control program. 7. Inform the County of programs available through the District and its cooperating agencies which affect natural resource management. 8. Assist with local educational programs relating to natural resources conservation and protection of the environment. M,~morandum of Understanding - - '~ 'Page 2 r~ 9. Furnish a copy of its long range program and annual report of acr_omplishments. 10. Prepare and submit to the County an annual plan of work and a budget request for carrying out the plan. THE COUNTY AGREES T0: 1. Assist the District in the development of effective soil and water conservation programs. 2. Provide the District with a copy of the comprehensive plan, land use plan and any other plan(s) for the County when they are adopted. 3. Consult with the District in the development or review of policies, ordinances and programs which deal with soil, water and related natural resources. 4. Help carry out an education program designed to make the public aware of the need for the proper use and management of natural resources. 5. Sponsor an annual review to determine the effectiveness of the local erosion and sediment control program. 6. Provide the district with funding and support of the District Annual Plan of Work. IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED THAT: 1. The County and the District may meet upon request to further coordinate their respective programs and activities for optimum mutual benefit. 2. Special emphasis will be given by the County and District to maximize the effectiveness of the local erosion and sediment control program. 3. This Memorandum may be amended or terminated at any time by mutual consent of the parties hereto or may be terminated by either party by giving sixty (60) days notice in writing, to the other party. In witness thereof, the Memorandum executed and agreed to on the day and month written above. BLUE RIDGE SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT By: , Chair n Date. ~(` ~ 1 ~~ BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA By: Chairman Date: ~IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIilllllillllllllllllilillllillllllllllillllllllllllllillllllllllllllllllilllllillllllllllllllllllllJ ~ j ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ APPEARANCE REQUEST _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ AGENDA ITEM NO. -_~ _ - SUBJECT ~~~~-.~ d~x~ ~~. ~~~,. s~% -~ ~;, ~.,.~ ~-~°-- I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supex~tisors to recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter m n .WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM _ so that li may com e t _ I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES =_ LISTED BELOW. _ • Each s Baker will be iven between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. "c c • S Bakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Ques- __ t peons of cl ' 'cation may be enterEained by the Chairman. • All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. • Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. • INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FQR AN ORGANIZED c GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. LEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO DEPUTY CLERK _ P . .+ ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER ~`~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: December 18, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: Request to Schedule Budget Work Sessions and Public Hearings with Regard to the 1991-92 Budget COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: • . ~~~/~~ SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The following dates are proposed for work sessions and public hearings on the 1991-92 Budget: Public Hearings January 22, 1991 Public Hearing to allow citizen discussion on the overall budget. February 26, 1991 Public Hearing to allow citizen discussion on the Capital Improvements Program. March 26, 1991 Public Hearing to allow citizen discussion on the overall budget. April 9, 1991 Public Hearing to allow citizen discussion on real estate, personal property, machinery and tools tax rates. Work Sessions January 8, 1991 Joint budget work session with Planning Commission to discuss the Capital Improvements Program. February 12, 1991 Budget work session to review 1991-92 revenue estimates and to disclose Board priorities. .: .. ~' = / February 12, 1991 Joint budget work session with Planning Commission to discuss the Capital Improvements Program. March 12, 1991 Joint budget work session with School Board. Department Directors to present their budget requests funded and unfunded. Superintendent of Schools to present proposed school budget. Fire and Rescue volunteers to present their budget requests. March 26, 1991 Joint budget work session with School Board. County Administrator to present balanced budget. April 9, 1991 Budget work session. April 16, 1991 Budget work session. Adopt real estate, (Special Meeting) personal property, machinery and tools tax rates. April 23, 1991 Budget work session. Adopt School and County budgets. A complete budget calendar is attached for your review. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the suggested public hearing and budget work session schedule; and the scheduling of a special meeting on April 16, 1991. Respectfully submitted, Approv d by, j,~ C%2-Ww- ~w _ I ~ ~ ~L.C y..l~ Reta R. Busher Elmer C. Hodge Director of Management and County Administrator Budget ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs Approved ( ) Motion by: Denied ( ) Eddy Received ( ) Johnson Referred ( ) McGraw To Nickens Robers ~-/ December 4, 1990 COUNTY OF ROANORE PROPOSED BUDGET CALENDAR FY 1991-92 Date Activity November 13, 1990 - Preparation of CIP Draft by the Depart- December 21, 1990 ments of Management & Budget and Planning & Zoning. Preparation of Revenue Estimates for FY 1991-92 by Department of Management and Budget. December 10, 1990 Preparation of Budget Packets for dis- January 4, 1991 tribution to all Department Directors and Constitutional Officers. December 21, 1990 CIP draft sent to Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors for review. January 2, 1991 Preparation of Departmental Target Al- January 14, 1991 locations by County Administrator and Budget staff. January 7, 1991 Kick-off budget meeting. County Administrator and Budget staff to review budget procedures, to distribute Budget Packets, and to hear department needs and priorities. January 8, 1991 Joint work session with Board of Supervisors and Planning Commission on CIP draft. January 17, 1991 Distribution of Targets to all Department Directors and Constitutional Officers. January 22, 1991 Public Hearing to allow citizen discussion on overall budget. February 1, 1991 Deadline for submission of departmental budgets, including unfunded requests. February 4, 1991 Review of departmental budgets for February 15, 1991 accuracy and completeness by Budget staff . . ~ ~~/ Date Activity February 5, 1991 Planning Commission to hold public hearing on CIP draft and to finalize recommendation on CIP. February 12, 1991 Work session with Board of Supervisors to discuss FY 1991-92 Revenue Es- timates. Joint Work Session with Planning Commission to discuss CIP draft. February 18, 1991 Department Directors, Assistant County March 1, 1991 Administrators and Constitutional Officers to meet with County Ad- ministrator and Budget staff to review budget requests. February 26, 1991 Public Hearing to allow citizen discussion on the CIP. March 8, 1991 Deadline for final version of depart- mental budgets. March 12, 1991 Joint budget work session with Board of Supervisors and School Board. County Administrator to present preliminary information with regard to County Budget and Superintendent of Schools to present proposed School Budget. Department Directors to present their budget requests funded and unfunded. March 12, 1991 Adoption of CIP for FY 1992-96. March 12, 1991 Budget work session with the Board of Supervisors and the Fire and Rescue Volunteers. March 26, 1991 Joint budget work session with the Board of Supervisors and the School Board. March 26, 1991 County Administrator to present balanced budget to Board of Super- visors. March 26, 1991 Public Hearing to allow citizen discussion on the overall budget. April 9, 1991 Budget work session with Board of Supervisors. .... ~~ Date Activity April 9, 1991 Public Hearing to allow citizen discussion on real estate, personal property, machinery and tools tax rates. April 16, 1991 Special meeting. Budget work session. Adoption of real estate, personal property, machinery and tools tax rates. April 23, 1991 Budget Work Session with Board of Supervisors. Adopt School and County budgets. May 14, 1991 First reading of Budget Appropriation Ordinance. May 28, 1991 Second reading of Budget Appropriation Ordinance. Adoption of Budget Appropriation Ordinance. Notes: a. Schools must submit their budget by April 1, 1991.- The governing body may accept by May 1, 1991, or within 30 days after receiving estimate of state funds. b. A notice announcing the public hearing on a tax rate must be published seven and fourteen days prior to the date of the hearing. c. A notice announcing the public hearing for the budget must be published at least seven days prior to the hearing. d. A notice announcing the public hearing .for the change in real estate assessments must be published at least seven days prior to the hearing. e. A notice of availability of the approved budget must be published no more than 30 days after the budget is approved by the Board of Supervisors. ACTION NO. ITEM NO . ° F "'° f AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: December 18, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: Request for a Public Hearing on January 22, 1991 to Elicit Citizen Comment on Prohibiting Discrimina- tion in Places of Public Accommodation in the County COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~,~ EXECUTIVE SUMMARY' This request for a public hearing on January 22, 1991, to elicit citizen comment on prohibiting discrimination in places of public accommodation in Roanoke County was discussed at the Board's December 4, 1990, meeting. The Board requested that it be placed on this agenda for discussion concerning the scheduling of a public hearing. The purpose of this public hearing is to determine if a problem exists in the County that can be addressed by the adoption of a local ordinance. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Roanoke City Council recently adopted an ordinance defining places of public accommodation and prohibiting discrimination in such places on the basis of race, color, national origin, creed, religion or sex. This ordinance was adopted pursuant to a 1989 amendment to the Roanoke City Charter. These actions on the part of the City were taken following a decision of the U.S. Supreme Court on June 20, 1988, upholding a New York City law prohibiting discrimination in certain private clubs that were determined to be sufficiently "public" in nature. The County Attorney has recently distributed to the Board a copy of the City ordinance. This public hearing should explore the nature and scope of discriminatory problems of this type, if any, within the County, and whether there is a pattern or practice of discriminatory 1 actions by private clubs which could be defined as places of public accommodation. This hearing could explore the role that local enforcement might play in this field, and whether federal dis- crimination statutes might be more effective enforcement vehicles. Finally this hearing could explore the broad exemptions from coverage in this type of local ordinance. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors authorize the scheduling and advertising of a public hearing for January 22, 1991, to elicit citizen comment on prohibiting discrimination in places of public accommodation in the County. Respectfully submitted, ~~"~ Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney Action Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by Eddy Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers vote No Yes Abs 2 ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER ~ "'~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: December 18, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: Request for Public Hearing for Citizen Comment on the 1991-92 Budget COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUNIIKARY OF INFORMATION: Staff would request that the Board schedule a public hearing on January 22, 1991 to invite citizen comments on the 1991-92 budget. Revenue and expenditure estimates will not be completed by that time, therefore citizen comment would be directed toward general programs and requests. Respectfully submitted, Approved by, Reta R. Busher Elmer C. Hodge Director of Management and County Administrator Budget --------------------------- ----------- ----- --------------------- ACT ION VOTE No Yes Abs Approved ( ) Motion by: Denied ( ) Eddy Received ( ) Johnson Referred ( ) McGraw To Nickens Robers r . ACTION NO. ITEM NO. ~' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: December 18, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: Request for a public hearing on January 22, 1991 to elicit citizen comment on the process of redis- tricting the County COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY' This request seeks authorization from the Board of Supervisors to schedule and advertise a public hearing to elicit citizen comment on the redistricting process. BACKGROUND' Article VII, Section 5 of the Virginia Constitution provides that the County must redistrict each ten years and the provisions of Title 15.1 which implement the constitutional provisions specify that the governing body shall use the population figures of the most recent decennial United States census. In addition, the Voting Rights Act mandates that redistricting plans cannot result in the dilution of minority voting strength. Every redistricting ordinance must be submitted to the Department of Justice and precleared before it can be implemented or used to conduct elections. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: This public hearing should seek citizen comment on the issues of compactness, contiguity, partisan or political fairness, district and precinct boundaries, natural geography and communities of interest. All of these factors shall be considered in the redistricting process. This public hearing should seek public comment concerning a proposed timetable for County staff to follow for redistricting as well as the creation of a committee composed of the Registrar, Director of Planning and Zoning, and the County Attorney to develop one or more redistricting plans for review and adoption. ~"'' ..~ ~ 4 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors authorize the scheduling and advertisement of a public hearing on January 22, 1991, to elicit citizen comment on the redistricting process for the County. Respectfully submitted, Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney Action Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by Eddy Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers Vote No Yes Abs 1 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. ~ ""'~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: December 18, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: Requests for Public Hearing and First Reading for Rezoning Ordinances Consent Agenda COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND• The first reading on these ordinances is accomplished by adoption of these ordinances in the manner of consent agenda items. The adoption of these items does not imply approval of the substantive content of the requested zoning actions, rather approval satisfies the procedural requirements of the County Charter and schedules the required public hearing and second reading of these ordinances. The second reading and public hearing on these ordinances is scheduled for January 22, 1991. The titles of these ordinances are as follows: 1. An ordinance to rezone approximately 78 acres from A-1 to R- 2 to expand the Orchards Subdivision, located north of US Route 460, west side of Alternate US Route 220, Hollins Magisterial District, upon the petition of F&W Community Development Corporation. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends as follows: (1) That the Board approve and adopt the first reading of these rezoning ordinances for the purpose of scheduling the second reading and public hearing for January 22, 1991. (2) That this section of the agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth as Item inclusive, and that the Clerk is authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this action. (~ -~ 2 Respectfully submitted, Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney Action Vote No Yes Abs Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by Eddy Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers ~ ~ ~~ Oate Rec. s Received By : ________ . - O' Case No.s Ord. No.s ROANOKE COUNTY REZONING APPLICATION C~.7 - ~ 1. Owner's Name: F&W Community Development Corporation Phone: 774-4415 Address : P.O. Box 20069, Roanoke VA 24018-0503 2 . Applicant's Name : same ~ Phone : - Address: - N of US Rt. 460 3. Location of Property: Adj Botetourt/Rke Co Line W. side Alt. US 220, Tax Map Number(s) : None -Assessed in Botetourt Co by agreement a . Magisterial District: Hollins Magisterial District __ 5. Size of Property: 78 Acres ± 6. Existing Zoning: ~A-i Existing Land Use: Pasture land ~ . Proposed Zoning: R-2 Proposed Land Use:. Middle density residential density usage 8. Comprehensive Plan Designation: Development - Urban Transition 9. Are Conditions Proffered With This Request? Yes No x (If you are voluntarily offering proffers as a part of your applica- jn9 Pj t~on n s ~ h e p of , can assist you in the prepay tio Staff j roffers thes 10. Value of Land and (Proposed) Buildings: 11. The Following Items Mu i nb at P n a edl Be Will Not io lic Check If Enclosed. App These Of Any lf Accept Items Are 1+iissinq Or Incomplete: / Letter of Application / Concept Plan ~_ Metes and Bounds Description "~ -~~~List~of Adjacent Owners of Property (Attach Exhibit A) "'I-~~ grit en Proffers / Application-Fee - ~ licable -'~ Water and Sewer Application (If App ) 12. Signature Of operty Owner, Contract Purchaser, Or Owner' ~ 9 n ~ ~y Development ~poration Signature By_w~.l~G~ ~ ~~%~~~~ Date 11/26/90 ce President F & W Community Development Corporation Post O(ilce Box 20069 Roanoke, Virginia 24018 Phone 703-774-4415 November 21, 1990 Mr. Terry Herrington Director of Planning COUNTY OF ROANORE Post Office Box 29800 Roanoke, Virginia 24018 Re: PROPOSED REZONING FROM A-1 TO R-2 78 ACRES t - FORMER MAX ~ DOROTHY HURRAY TRACT THE ORCHARDS Dear Terry: Fralin and Waldron acquired the Crumpacker Orchards property in 1972 and at that time had a master development plan prepared for residential, commercial and public uses and had the property zoned by Roanoke County and Botetourt County in agreement with that conceptual development plan. Residential areas have been developed site/recreation area has been acquired by all in general accord with conceptual/development plan. and a school Roanoke County, the original In 1985, F&W acquired the Max and Dorothy Murray 106 Acre ± tract lying in both Roanoke and Botetourt Counties, zoned agricultural and located between the properties acquired by F&W in 1972. A small drawing showing the Murray tract and adjacent lands is attached. In order to properly plan for future growth and the eventual usage of the Murray tract in conjunction with the other Roanoke and Botetourt County lands and with residential development progressing south from the Botetourt Bast and Botetourt South subdivision areas in Botetourt County, F&W has recently asked for and received an R-3 zoning on that portion (28 acres t) of the Murray tract in .Botetourt County and is at this time asking Roanoke County to rezone the balance of the Murray tract (78 acres t) from A-1 to R-2. ~-/ r "' Mr. Terry Herrington November 21, 1990 - Paqe Two - The R-3 zoning in Botetourt County requires a minimum size lot of 10,000 S.F. and 80' frontage while the R-2 being .requested from Roanoke County requires a minimum size lot of 10,000 S.F. and a minimum frontage of 75'. The subject .tract is in a "Development" area under the County's land use plan and meets all criteria for practically all higher density development desired in such areas as well as being located near a future school site, having public water and sewer available, having a beautiful rolling topography suitable for urban residential development, being located directly adjacent to a future major street access to U.S. Alternate Route 220 and being located within an urban service area in a section of the County earmarked for substantial growth. While the attached map referred to above does not show the entire Orchards conceptual/development plan, this overall plan will be presented to the Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors at the public hearings and a copy made available to the Planning Staff with this application. If further information is desired at this time, please advise me. With best personal wishes, I am yours, J es-A. Beavers ice President JAB/lcw attachment cc: R. S. ,Whitney, Jr. Gary L. Robertson, P.E. Lumsden Associates, P.C. e s ~ ~ ~• I '~ ~ 'dam ~ ~ i~~ ~ ~ ttj''r' .',. ~• Z~ii i~ ~~ ~~ ~f i -- ..i~.. ~~ .,, ... ~. .-.-- .. .. . ._ . . ,s.: ....._ :.. ~~~ ~~: - ~ ,~ ' ~~,. ~, . - ~..• . • ~- - -~ . ~ r, .• • _ -.,~ _._., -- ~~~~~~~ . ~~~~ ~; ~: ~iE~ . __.. i ~ : ~ k ~~ ~ ~ ~ 1~ .. _-- .. ' ~': ~ ~ ~ ~ ! • r : ! ~ t ~ ~ ~~ ,~ z ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ 1,.~~~ ~ ~ 5~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ i ~ . ~'" ~: :: Ci - / NORTB COMMUNITY SERVICBS AND DBVBLOPMBNT F&-! COf4MU~ITY DEVELO°ME~lT A-1 TO R-2 A. ACTION # ITEM NUMBER l~"/ -~ I MEETING DATE: December 18, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: Acceptance and Acquisition of Surplus Real Estate From the Roanoke County School Board and Authorizing the Conveyance of Same to the Commonwealth of Virginia COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS : G~cc+~w~' BACKGROUND: The Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) is in the process of acquiring right of way for the construction and improvement of Route 460 West in Roanoke County. VDOT is requesting from the school board twenty (20) feet of the Fort Lewis Elementary School frontage. (A copy of correspondence from VDOT including plat is attached.) Conveyance of said right of way will not interfere with the school program. VDOT has offered to pay $1,835.00 to the school board for the right of way. Mr. Homer Duff, director of facilities and operations, will be present to answer any questions related to the request. FISCAL IMPACT: None STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The Roanoke County School Board on December 6, 1990 declared twenty feet of the Fort Lewis Elementary School property surplus with the request that the sum of $1,835.00 to be paid by the Virginia Department of Transportation to the County School Board of Roanoke County be deposited in the School Capital Outlay Fund. / ~ B{J Homer D. Duff, Director Elmer C. Hodge Facilities & Operations County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs Approved ( ) Motion by: Eddy _ Denied ( ) _ Johnson Received ( ) - McGraw Referred ( ) Nickens To _ Robers ,_ cc: Tf,y,w'"CjN~4, M ,I I~ .-, ~, 9,, ",..`~ COMMONdVEALTH of 'VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION P. O. BOX 3071 RAY D. PETHTEL SALEM, 24153 COMMISSIONER NOV 1 5 1990 Mr. Alan L. Rhodes Roanoke County School Board 526 College Avenue Salem, Virginia 24153 Dear Mr. Rhodes: RIGHT OF WAY - Route 460 Project 0460-129-104, RW203 Roanoke County PPMS I.D. 596 Property of Roanoke County School Board Parcel 024 N- / B. W. SUMPTER DISTRICT ADMINISTRATOR The Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) is in the process of acquiring right of way for the construction and improvement of the above project. Your property is being affected, and it is necessary that VDOT offer the fair market value of those rights to be acquired. The fair market value of your property was determined by an appraiser assigned to this project who made a thorough study of real estate values in the area through which this project passes. The study required the confirmation of property sales that have taken place within the project area during the past several years. The area was also studied to determine any trends or activities of the real estate market that may affect the value of your property. Upon completion of these studies and the assembly of all information, the appraiser then determined the effects of the proposed road construction on your property and established fair market value. The studies and appraisal were based on approved professional appraisal techniques. Accordingly, the following represents a summary of VDOT's offer to you: Land & Improvements $1,835.00 Damages to Remaining Land & Improvements 0 Total Offer $1,835.00 Enclosed for your review and execution is VDOT's agreement setting forth the above consideration, the conditions of conveyance, and description of the area needed. Also, enclosed is a copy of Sheets No. 8 and 9 of the road plans for TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21ST CENTURY r ~ Mr. Alan L. Rhodes Page 2 this project, showing outlined in ORANGE the land conveyed for a tempo- rary easement and in PURPLE the land conveyed for a utility easement. ~/ Should you agree to accept the offer, please have all parties execute this agreement. Once you return it to us, VDOT will order payment from the State Treasurer covering the consideration set forth above. Should you require further information regarding this offer', please feel free to contact me at the number and address indicated below. We appreciate your cooperation and consideration of our offer. By your agreement, Virginia's Transportation System will continue to be one of the finest in the nation. I will be contacting you for your decision in the next few days. Sincerely yours, /" ~~/ R. G. Morris Acquisition Specialist Right of Way Division P. 0. Box 3071 Salem, Virginia 24153-3071 Telephone No. 703 387-5369 RGM/fhr Attachment cc: Mr. S. A. Waymack (.'~ ~~ ~, -~-'-- T}fIS DEED OF EASEMENT made <<nd entered itlto this say of 1S ley and between ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS party(parties) of the i'ir5t part, hereinafter sometimes referred to as "OWNER", and the CITY OF SAL}:r4, VIRGINIA, a Municipal Corporation, party of the second }>art, hereinafter sometimes referred to as the "CITY". W I T N E S S E 'I' 11 THAT FOR AND IN CONSIDERATION of the swn of ONE DOLLAR ($1.00) paid by the City to the owner, a receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged and for other good and valuable considers- bons, the owner grants and conveys to the City of Salem, Virginia, the right and casement to construct, operate and main- twin or remove an electric power line, with all necessary poles, towers, anchors, wires and fixtures, together with the right to control any trees or brush which may endanger the safety or inter- fere with the construction and use of said line. Together with the right of inE;ress anti egress itr and over said lands of the grantor for the enjoyment of the rights and privileges herein granted. Said easement of ri-ght of way being more particularly described as follows, town A 20' x 45' UTILITY EASEMENT BEING MORE PARTICULARLY SHOWN ON A COPY OF A PORTION OF SHEET NO. &, VIRGINIA STATE HIGHWAY PROJECT NO. 0460-129-104, PE-101, WHICH IS MADE A PART HEREOF J1ND IS RECORDED HEREWITH. +- WITNESS the following; signatures a.nd seals: STATE OF VIRGINIA OF towitt: (SEAL) (SEAL) (SEAL) (SEAL) (SEAL) (SEAL) (SEAL) (SEAL) I, the undersigned Notary Pubic, in and for the jurisdic- tion aforesaid, do hereby certify that whose names are signed to the foregoing Deed of Easement dated this day of 19 have each personally appeared before me and acknowledged the same in my jurisdiction aforesaid. GIVEN under my hand this day of My commission expires 19 Notary Public I:::.::: ::::+:::~: ~~ 1 I:::::: :::::::~~~ E I' ::::::: :::::: ~I~ ~ I~ ::::::: ::::::: I :::::::: :::::::~I ~I ::::o: ~::::~'€~ (~::::~ ~i ~:::~ ::::::~~ ~I ::: ~~~ ::::v`Jf l :::~?~{~ ::::::: ~ ~ ~ ~I~~~~ i::::::::: ~::::::::: i. ~I~ ~~~~: :~::::::~ k ::::::~~~. ::I:::: ~~~:I:.. ::I:::::::...: I I ::~ ~: ~: ~:: ~;.; ..:::::::~ I : ~' ;;~:::;...~ ::::::~~~:: I ~ ~:E:::~`°b~ :::~:::E~: ;W:: ~~ o ~o ~,~ i~Z~ '° °~ '~+o~c6'v ~°~'~ ~~' o~ ~~ ~, •~ "`~ ~~ c c~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~ ~~ V~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ` ~ c ~. ~~ ~ ~ o ~ tic ~ ~ ~~ ~~o~ ~ ~~ ~~~ ~ ,~ ~, C v~ c~~Q~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ J ~ ~ ~ ~o ~~~~~a,~~V~~~ o ~ ~~ ~~ ~~~~ ~~~ ~® ~~ COUNTY OF RDANOKf ~ ~~.~ ~A~fit~1 C/TY L/M/T.~ _ Nis~.~ts ~/s~~~d)~` N,(~ .~D /Y,SD y, ciry oFsa~f~ ~s , _~ ~ l~ ,~ a a~-~~ P~~ Q --- ~~ ~~~ i W~~ ~ ~ ~ ~` ~ ~~ ~ ~ 09L°X~/.~' ~ ~, ~ 9z'2~aw~a, 1 ~ ~, ~~ ~ # _. .~ ,; FROM THE MINUTES OF THE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD OF ROANOKE COUNTY MEETING IN REGULAR SESSION AT 7 P.M. ON DECEMBER 6, 1990 IN THE BOARD ROOM OF THE S-CHOO~L ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, SALEM, VIRGINIA. /~l - / RESOLUTION DECLARING A PORTION OF THE FORT LEWIS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SITE SURPLUS PROPERTY. WHEREAS, the Virginia Department of Transportation has proposed to make improvements to State Route 460 West which will require the acquisition of right of way on the Fort Lewis Elementary School property, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that, in accordance with Section 22.1-129 of the Code of Virginia, the County School Board of Roanoke County, on motion of Barbara B. Chewning and duly seconded, hereby declares approximately twenty (20) feet of the Fort Lewis Elementary School site adjoining State Route 460 West, (as defined in documents provided by the Virginia Department of Transportation) to be surplus property and directs the clerk of said school board to file this resolution with the Clerk of the Circuit Court for attachment to the deed of said property and vestment of title of said property to Roanoke County; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said school board requests that the sum of $1,835.00 to be paid by the Virginia Department of Transportation to the County School Board of Roanoke County be deposited in the School Capital Outlay Fund. Adopted on the following recorded vote: AYES: Barbara B. Chewning, Maurice L. Mitchell, Charlsie S. Pafford, Paul G. Black, Frank E. Thomas NAYS: None TESTE : j-~~ / /~ " /~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, DECEMBER 18, 1990 ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE ACCEPTANCE AND ACQUISITION OF SURPLUS REAL ESTATE FROM THE ROANOKE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD, AND FURTHER, AUTHORIZING THE CONVEYANCE OF SAME TO THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter, the acquisition and disposition of real estate can be authorized only by ordinance. A first reading of this ordinance was held on December 18, 1990; and a second reading was held on January 8, 1990. 2. That the County School Board of Roanoke County on December 6, 1990, adopted a resolution declaring twenty (20) feet of the Fort Lewis Elementary School property to be surplus property pursuant to Section 22.1-129 of the Code of Virginia (1950), as amended. 3. That the acceptance and acquisition of certain real estate located in front of the Fort Lewis Elementary School, identified as a "PROPOSED UTILITY EASEMENT" measuring 20' by 45' as shown on Sheet 8 of the plans for Route 460, State Highway Project 0460-129-104 PE101, from the Roanoke County School Board is hereby authorized. 4. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.01 of the Charter of Roanoke County, the subject real estate is being made available to the Commonwealth of Virginia for other public uses, namely, the widening of State Route 460. „• ~-.~- 5. That the offer of the Virginia Department of Transportation in the amount of $1,835 for the acquisition of the property is hereby accepted and shall be credited to the School Capital Outlay Fund, and the conveyance of the real estate described above to the Virginia Department of Transportation for other public uses is hereby authorized and approved. 6. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized to execute such documents and take such actions as may be necessary to accomplish these transactions, all of which shall be on form approved by the County Attorney. FROM THE MINUTES OF THE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD OF ROANOKE COUNTY MEETING IN REGULAR SESSION AT 7 P.M. ON DECEMBER 6, 1990 IN THE BOARD ROOM OF THE SCHOOL ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, SALEM, VIRGINIA. RESOLUTION DECLARING A PORTION OF THE FORT LEWIS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SITE SURPLUS PROPERTY. WHEREAS, the Virginia Department of Transportation has proposed to make improvements to State Route 460 West which will require the acquisition of right of way on the Fort Lewis Elementary School property, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that, in accordance with Section 22,1-129 of the Code of Virginia, the County School Board of Roanoke County, on motion of Barbara B. Chewning and duly seconded, hereby declares approximately twenty (20) feet of the Fort Lewis Elementary School site adjoining State Route 460 West, (as defined in documents provided by the Virginia Department of Transportation) to be surplus property and directs the clerk of said school board to file this resolution with the Clerk of the Circuit Court for attachment to the deed of said property and vestment of title of said property to Roanoke County; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said school board requests that the sum of $1,835.00 to be paid by the Virginia Department of Transportation to the County School Board of Roanoke County be deposited in the School Capital Outlay Fund. Adopted on the following recorded vote: AYES: Barbara B. Chewning, Maurice L. Mitchell, Charlsie S. Pafford, Paul G, Black, Frank E. Thomas NAYS: None ~r' ~`t YI~Y• 1=o RT R Kc. I~. 13 . t P~c~: ~J9 C~C~ - I ~~~r - I c~ ~, ~~~;, ~ 2~ ~ LCc.vis Schloo ~ Coca -v-ry 130A~~ o~ SUPC;~V/ Sods 17 S C' G 9 5 .: ,~: ,. 029 Received of The Chesapeake and Potomac Telephone Company o1 Virginia One Dollar (51.00; in consideration of v,~hich the undersigned hereby grant and conve}~ unto said Compan}-, its successors, assigns, lessees and agents, a right of way and easement to construct, operate, maintain, repla:.e and remove a communication system consisting of such poles, fixtures, gu}~s, anchors, ~~ires, cables, buried cables, buried wires, posts, terminals, location markers, conduits, manholes, and other appurtenances, as the grantees may from time to time require, upon, under, across and over the land which the unoer- signed own or in which the undersi ned have an}~ interest; in the pI~TIC~~ of CKn'1~-t.y~bl~ ,County of ~OA~OkE ,and State of Virginia and upon, under along and over the roads, streets and highwa}-s adjoining the saiC land, together with the follov:inc rights: Of ingress and egress over, under and across the lands of the undersigned to and from said s}~stems for the purpose of exercising the rights herein granted; to open and close fences, to cut dov:n and keep cut down all trees and undergrowth wlthin~_feet of said s}'stem: and to carry in said s}'stem the wires, cables, circuits and appurtenances of any other Compan}~; including all electric wires. Said easement being located and described on said land as follows: i _~ ~3ACC ~7' ~ p~JR/~(.~LC L -To STATE lei cv Ll E o ~ !C. ~G 6 ,. !,~ 5 ,yDcu~J o ~ 57~T~ Nay ~L,gNs -~-- Witness hand and seal this day of 1g- _ .... State of Virginia, I, Virginia in and for the (Seal) (Seal) '1 O VJIt: of the State of aforesai~, do hereby cer',if}~ that .~~ name of Owner Owner of • a -- .,,.,,~ signed to the within v.~ritino bearing date on the day _ , 79 _ has acknowledged the same before me in my and State aforesaid. Given under my hand this day of 19 _ Notary Public y'j tJly commission expires day of 19 _ /.. ~~' /'~ GRW 32-UGOHD-AP (8-86) -CORPORATIONS THIS AGREEMENT, made this day of ,19 -, by and between T1~E C~1-'~ SCNP~~- i3y~1~-D-~~ ~?~~-e°'«s" -~~ `~'T ~i of ~L?~~/~ organized and existing under the laws of the State of 1/12GJ~~~ ,herein called "Grantor", and APPALACHIAN POWER COMPANY, a Virginia corporation, herein called "Appalachian", WITNESSETH: That for and in consideration of the sum of One Dollar ($1.00), cash in hand paid to Grantor by Appalachian, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, Grantor hereby grants, conveys, and warrants to Appalachian, its successors, assigns, lessees and tenants, a right of way and easement for an electric power line or lines, and communication lines, in, on, along, through, over, across or under 'the following described lands of the Grantor situated in C'° rA~°-'-B'Q __ - -- District, County of-Y~~~-~'- ,State of Virginia, and bounded: On the North by the lands of L-~~ ~~-`'~!~ On the East by the lands of ~,P/S E'R's O F ~~~~~ LGw~s G~~isTi 9~ GN/.2Cf~ On the South by -~ , S - ~cc-r'.~' •4~d On the West by the lands of VETA ~• ~~~ TT - This easement extends in a Appalachian's existing and including new_ direction from numbered umbered to TOGETHER with the right, privilege and authority to Appalachian, its successors, assigns, lessees and tenants, to construct, erect, install, place, operate, maintain, inspect, repair, renew, remove, add to the number of, and relocate at will, poles, with wires, cables, crossarms, guys, anchors, grounding systems and all other appurtenant equipment and fixtures, underground conduits, ducts, vaults, cables, wires, transformers, pedestals, risers, pads, fixtures, and appurtenances (hereinafter called "Appalachian's Facilities"), and string wires and cables, adding thereto from time to time, in, on, along, over, through, across and under the above referred to premises; the right to cut down, trim, clear, and/or otherwise control, and at Appalachian's option, remove from said premises, any trees, shrubs, roots, brush, undergrowth, overhanging branches, buildings or other obstructions which may endanger the safety of, or interfere with the use of, Appalachian's Facilities; the right to disturb the surface of said premises and to excavate thereon; and the right of ingress and egress to and over said above referred to premises, and any of the adjoining lands of the Grantor at any and all times, for the purpose of exercising and enjoying the rights herein granted, and for doing anything necessary or useful or convenient in connection therewith. It is understood and agreed between the parties hereto, that the Grantor reserves the right to use said lands in any way not inconsistent with the rights herein granted. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same unto Appalachian Power Company, its successors, assigns, lessees and tenants. Eas No. _--___--- R/W Map No. 37f34 - z_~ - A W.O. No. 2.~'~~-~ Job No. ~Q_~L~?~-- Prop No. ~~ Line L.f__ 'S-~~2~1Gh[s~ A-~F-j1-EI ~xATX~~1_ It is agreed that the foregoing is the entire contract between the parties hereto, and that this written agreement is complete in all its terms and provisions. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Grantor has caused its corporate name and seal to be hereto affixed the day and year first above written. By STATE OF ATTEST: To-wit: COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 19 , by ___ of __ . a --- My Commission expires: day of Corporation, on behalf of the Corporation. Notary Public/Commissioner (For W. Va. Only) DECLARATION OF CONSIDERATION OF VALUE Under the penalties of fine and imprisonment as provided by law the undersigned (grantee) hereby declares the total consideration for the property trans- ferred by this document is ($ )• Given under my hand this -day of -- - , ~ 9-_---. . APPALACHIAN POWER COMPANY By (For W. Va. Only) THIS INSTRUMENT PREPARED President Secretary GRW 32-UGOHD-AP (Page 2) r ,. , ' ACTION NUMBER ~^ ,/ ITEM NUMBER *--"' / "` AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: December 18, 1990 • SUBJECT: Appointments to Committees, Commissions and Boards COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION• 1. Board of Zoning Appeals Five-year term of M. E. Maxey, Vinton Magisterial District expired June 30, 1990. 2. Buildina Code Board of Adjustments and Appeals Four-year term of Wilmore T. Leffell„ expired December 12, 1990. Mr. Leffell is from the Vinton Magisterial District and is a building contractor. 3. Grievance Panel Two-year terms of R. Vincent Reynolds, Alternate expired September 10, 1990. Mr. Reynolds has been nominated to serve as a regular member of the Grievance Panel. 4. Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission Unexpired three-year term of James Bryant, Hollins Magisterial District. His term will expire June 30, 1991. 5. Planning Commission Four-year term of A. Kyle Robinson, Vinton Magisterial District will expire December 31, 1990. 7. Recycling Advisory Committee The Board approved the establishment of a Recycling Advisory Committee on September 25, 1990. The following appointments should be made by the Board of Supervisors: -,, ~J ~' C® - One citizen representing the business community from Roanoke County SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: Mary K. Allen Clerk to the Board • ~~/ y Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ----------------------------- Approved ACTION VOTE ( ) Motion by: Denied ( ) No Yes Abs Received ( ) Eddy Referred ( ) Johnson To ( ) McGraw Nickens Robers K AT A REGULAR MEETING O THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION OCENTER COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT ON TUESDAY, DECEMBER 18, 1990 RESOLUTION 121-4 APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE'DESIGNATED AS ITEM R - CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. that the certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for December 18, 1990 designated as Item K - Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 13, inclusive, as follows: 1, Approval of Minutes - November 13, 1990, November 26, 1990, November 30, 1990. 2. Confirmation of Committee Appointments to the Grievance Panel, Library Board, and the Recycling Advisory Committee, and ratification of appointment to Mental Health Services of the Roanoke Valley Board of Directors. 3. Approval of 50/50 Raffle Permit for Roanoke County School Food Service Chapter. 4, Approval of 1991 Bingo Permit for Loyal Order of Moose Lodge #284. 5, Approval of 50/50 Raffle Permit for Loyal Order of Moose Lodge #284• 6. Acceptance, discontinuance and aaridaRoutee690 in portions of Route 692, Route 689, the Va. Department of Transportation Secondary System. ~, Acceptance of 0.24 mile of Fairway Estate, 0.11 mile of Viking Drive, 0.12 mile of No0rs05mam1Deivof 0.14 mile of Chippenham Drive, Shrewsbury Court, 0.18 mile of Brentwood Court, 0.12 mile of Kingsmill Drive, 0.10 mile of Mill Pond Drive into VDOT Secondary System. g. Acceptance kfRun to artments.itary sewer facilities serving Buc P g. Request for acceptance of Henry Farms Road into the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System. 10. Request fOia De eartment of Transport ti n Secondary the Virgin p System. 11. Request from Virginia Departmen S stem adueo to tthe for changes in the Secondary y relocation and reconstruction of Bradshaw Road. 12. Adoption of resolution with respect to the Roanoke County Resource Authority landfill financing. 13. Approval of 50/50 Raffle Permit for the Women of the Moose Chapter 1022. 2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this resolution. On motion of Supervisor Johnson with items 4 and 5 removed for a separate vote, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES• Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None Items 4 and 5 on motion of Supervisor Johnson, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES• Supervisors Eddy, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None ABSTAIN: Supervisor McGraw A COPY TESTE: yn~~ Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors CC: File Bingo and Raffle File Phillip Henry, Director of Engineering Clifford Craig, Utility Director Diane Hyatt, Director of Finance ~" ~ ~ r' November 13, 1990 Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Roanoke County Administration Center 3738 Brambleton Avenue, S.W. Roanoke, Virginia 24018 November 13, 1990 The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, met this day at the Roanoke County Administration Center, this being the second Tuesday, and the only regularly scheduled meeting of the month of November. IN REs CALL TO ORDER Chairman Robers called the meeting to order at 3:00 p.m. The roll call was taken. MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Richard W. Robers, Vice Chairman Steven A. McGraw, Supervisors Lee B. Eddy, Bob L. Johnson, Harry C. Nickens (arrived at 3:45 p.m.) MEMBERS ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator; John M. Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator for Human Services; John R. Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator of Community Services and Development; Don M. Myers, Assistant County Administrator for Management Services; Paul M. _~ + , 'a November 13, 1990 Supervisor McGraw requested that when Supervisor Nickens arrived, he be allowed to vote on this motion. At 5:03 p.m., Supervisor Nickens indicated his aye vote and the motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisor Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None IN RE: PROCLAMATIONB~ RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS, AND AWARDS 1. Resolution suy~ortinq continued regional cooperation in the Roanoke Valley. R-111390-1 Supervisor Eddy requested that copies of the resolution be sent to the respective clerks of the governing bodies. Supervisor McGraw moved to approve the resolution. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Robers NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens Supervisor McGraw requested that when Supervisor Nickens arrived, he be allowed to vote on this motion. At 5:03 p.m. and at the conclusion of the afternoon agenda items, Supervisor Johnson moved to reconsider the adoption of the resolution in order that Supervisor Nickens who was absent earlier could vote. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: -~ ~' '~ i.~ V November 13, 1990 ' Roanoke County that the Board of Supervisors and County staff support and initiate joint projects and facilities with the other jurisdictions of the Roanoke Valley. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors does hereby formally adopt a resolution in support of regional cooperation and interjurisdictional problem- solving; and further, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors urges the governing bodies of the Cities of Salem and Roanoke, Town of Vinton and Botetourt County to join with them in making this commitment to the citizens of the Roanoke Valley, and further, BE IT RESOLVED that a copy of this resolution be transmitted to the respective clerks for the governing bodies of the City of Roanoke, City of Salem, Town of Vinton and County of Botetourt. On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt the resolution and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None 2. Proclamation declaring the week of November 11 - 17, 1990 as American Education Week. Mr. Bud McWhorter, President of the Roanoke County Education Association, and Dr. Bayes Wilson, Superintendent, Roanoke County Schools, were present to accept the proclamation. Supervisor Johnson moved to approve the proclamation. The ~ rj ,J November 13, 1990 At 5:03 p.m., Supervisor Nickens indicated his aye vote and the motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisor Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None RE8OLIITION 111390-2 OF APPRECIATION TO ELMER C. HODGE ON HIS FIFTH ANNIVERSARY AS ROANORE COIINTY ADMINISTRATOR WHEREAS, Elmer C. Hodge, Jr. has been County Administrator for Roanoke County since November, 1985; and WHEREAS, even before his official date of employment, he was in the County, directing clean up operations after the 1985 flood; and WHEREAS, Mr. Hodge has been responsible for a variety of projects which have been greatly beneficial to the people of Roanoke County and of the Valley as a whole; and WHEREAS, these projects include the Roanoke County Charter, the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission, the new Regional Landfill, curbside and automated recycling, County-wide garbage collection, and Spring Hollow Reservoir; and WHEREAS, during Mr. Hodge's administration, the County has received the All America City Award, four National Association of Counties Achievement Awards, and two Virginia Municipal League Achievement Awards. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors does hereby express its appreciation and gratitude to Elmer C. Hodge, Jr. on the occasion of his fifth anniversary serving as Roanoke County Administrator; and .a ~ , ,~ November 13, 1990 best price. Supervisor Eddy was concerned that the directions to the consultant were too vague, without policy decisions, and the cost for the study was too great. He suggested designing a new RFP for new conditions and getting new proposals. Director of Utilities Cliff Craig responded to Supervisor Johnson that in his professional opinion, this was an appropriate amount of money for the study and he would recommend the award. After further discussion, Supervisor Johnson moved to approve staff recommendation. Supervisor Eddy made a substitute motion that the study be limited to water and exclude sewage. The motion was denied by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy NAYS: Supervisors McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers Supervisor Johnson moved to approve the original staff recommendation. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: Supervisor Eddy 2. Appropriation of funds for Allied Signal economic development prospect. A-111390-4 Finance Director Diane Hyatt advised that on October 23, 1990, Allied Signal announced their plans to construct a facility in Western Roanoke County. The County agreed to donate $125,000 to the `~ ~ ~.. November 13, 1990 Director and Tom Chapman, Director of Administration, were present to answer questions. Supervisor Robers moved to receive and file the report. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None 4. Request for additional funds to complete Read Mountain Fire station. A-111390-5 Mark Light, Deputy Chief of Fire & Rescue, advised that in 1985, the projected cost of a station in the Bonsack area with Botetourt County was estimated to be $300,000; however, the projected total cost will be $474,886. Deputy Chief Light requested that the board appropriate $174,886 so that the project can be completed in early 1991. Supervisor Nickens expressed concern about including a complete sprinkler system for the fire station in the contingency fund. In response to Supervisor Nickens question about the financial involvement of Botetourt County, Mr. Hodge advised that Botetourt County cannot contribute to the amount being requested at this time but Botetourt County is donating the land, part of the operating costs and the majority of the fire fighters. Supervisor Johnson moved the staff recommendation to appropriate $174,886 to complete the Read Mountain Fire Station. November 13, 1990 } .. A work session was set for Monday, November 26, 1990, at 3 p.m. for the board and staff to discuss future issues. IN RE: FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance amending and reenacting Chapter 4, Amusements. Section 4-99, ~~Bingo Games and Raffles~~, of the Roanoke County Code, providing for an increase in the audit fee. Mr. Mahoney was present to answer questions. The second reading of this ordinance will be December 4, 1990. There was no one present to speak to the ordinance. Supervisor Eddy questioned whether under state law, if it does not cost the 2% to conduct the audit, could the excess be put in the County treasury. Mr. Mahoney advised that we are limited by the state code authorizing the legislation. Supervisor Nickens moved to approve first reading of the ordinance. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None 2. Ordinance amending and reenacting Chapter 21. Taxation of the Roanoke County Code to provide for a reduction in the amount of penalties for failure to file returns for Personal Property taxes. f z.~ November 13, 1990 of the provision but did not believe the State Code sections require this and should be left to the reasonable interpretation of the County Administrator. Supervisor Eddy pointed out that the enforcement of this ordinance would be by the County Administrator and suggested that the ordinance be publicized and brochures prepared when approved. Supervisor Nickens asked if there was a prohibition under State Code for governmental facilities to allow smoking in common areas such as lobbies, restrooms. Mr. Mahoney stated that the State Code for not smoking in common areas is limited to the educational facilities but not governmental buildings. Supervisor Nickens moved to approve first reading of the ordinance. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None 4. Ordinance to authorize acquisition of yarcel of land adjacent to Bonsack Well No. 1. The second reading will be December 4, 1990. There was no one present to speak to the ordinance. There was no discussion. Supervisor Johnson moved to approve first reading of the ordinance. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None _ ;, -_ November 13, 1990 y'~ 1. Ordinance at the rectuest of Roanoke Gas Company to share a County water line easement. 0-111390-7 There was no discussion. Supervisor Nickens moved to approve the second reading of the ordinance. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None ORDINANCE 111390-7 AIITHORIZING THE CONVEYANCE OF AN EASEMENT TO THE ROANORE GAS COMPANY BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.01 of the Charter of Roanoke County, the subject property has been declared to be surplus and is being made available for other public uses, i.e. a gas line easement within the existing water line easement; and 2. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading concerning the disposition of the subject property was held on October 23, 1990; a second reading was held on November 13, 1990; and 3. That the twenty (20) foot wide water line easement currently exists across three residential properties in the Deer Run Estates Subdivision; said easements were granted unto Roanoke County by deeds of easement recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of November 13, 1990 2. Explore Citizens Advisory Committee - .~~ `~ -` .~ Supervisor Robers nominated Pam Glover from the Cave Spring District. Supervisor Nickens nominated C. W. Church Williams from the Vinton District. Supervisor Johnson nominated David Layman, from the Hollins District. Supervisor Johnson suggested to County Attorney Paul Mahoney that during redistricting, consideration should be given to putting the North Lakes Subdivision into one district. He also requested that Mr. Mahoney consider how redistricting will affect membership in the County committees, commissions and board. Mr. Mahoney advised that a public hearing on redistricting will probably be set for the second meeting in January, 1991. 3s Mental Health Services Community Services Board Supervisor Eddy nominated Dr. Henry Sullivan for reappointment to a three-year term which will expire December 31, 1993. 4. Planning Commission Supervisor McGraw introduced and nominated Marian Chappelle from the Catawba District to fill the unexpired four-year term of Wayland Winstead which will expire December 31, 1993. i; ..~ `~ ,. a November 13, 1990 3. Acceptance of serving Woodbr 4. Acceptance of serving Viking 5. Acceptance of sanitary sewer water and sanitary sewer facilities idge Section 11. water and sanitary sewer facilities Court. payment by ITT for reconstruction of line. 6. Request for acceptance of Remington Road into the VDOT Secondary System. 7. Donation of drainage easements in connection with the Ingal Blvd. Project. 2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this resolution. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None RESOLIITION 111390-8.e REQIIESTING ACCEPTANCE OF REMINGTON ROAD INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That this matter came this day to be heard upon the proceedings herein, and upon the application for Remington Road, a section of road extending from Falcon Ridge Road, (Route 1939), 0.07 miles east of Hunting Hills Drive (Route 1541), and extending in a G 1 = i November 13, 1990 IN RE: REPORTS AND INQIIIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS Supervisor Eddv: (1) He reported on his visit to the Bent Mountain School which was dedicated last Sunday and made a tour of Back Creek Elementary School in honor or American Education Week. (2) He advised that he is now writing and mailing out a Windsor Hills District newsletter at his personal expense. He offered to add anyone interested to his mailing list. (3) He expressed appreciation that a legislative item previously requested was not placed on the legislative program. (4) He asked Paul Mahoney if redistricting would affect the County Charter. Mr. Mahoney advised that no changes to the County Charter would be necessary for the various alternatives of redistricting and advised that a public hearing will be requested for the second meeting in January. (5) He asked for an update on the recorded message system because of the telephone directory deadline. John Chambliss advised that staff should be prepared to make a final proposal on the pricing and the system by the end of the month. (6) He expressed his concern about Back Creek Fire Station not being paved before cold weather. Mr. Hodge will try to get better costs for paving by combining the work to be done with other areas. (7) He reported on the TV program concerning the consolidation aftermath and complimented Supervisor McGraw on his performance. Supervisor McGraw: (1) He reported on a discussion with Howard Musser on the same television show about future cooperation between Roanoke County and Roanoke City in negotiating the Cable TV °j ~: November 13, 1990 Commission being composed of citizens. Supervisor McGraw sllQQPRtP~ that Chairman Robers write a letter to Mayor Taylor about changing the structure of the Airport Commission. the letter. IN RE: REPORTS Mr. Hodge and staff will draft Supervisor Nickens moved to receive and file the following reports after a discussion of Item 5. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None 1. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance 2. General Fund Unappropriated Balance 3. Board Contingency Fund 4. Statement of income and expenses for the four months ended October 31, 1990 5. Report on CORTRAN/RADAR transportation. IN RE: REPORT ON CORTRAN/RADAR TRANSPORTATION Assistant County Administrator Don Myers presented the staff report listing three alternatives for expanding CORTRAN services to five days and until 6:15 p.m. in the evening. This report was in response to the request of Mr. Rich Boehler at the October 23, 1990 meeting. ', .~ November 13, 1990 ' facility, the design of the facility, signage that must be posted, and the requirements for submittal of the application were part of the staff review of this request. The Roanoke County Police Department met with the applicants last summer and reviewed the standards in the design of the facility. Mr. Harrington advised that the main issue is the proximity of the facility to the County~s Whispering Pines Park which abuts the property on two sides. The Department of Parks & Recreation has significant concerns regarding the noise and safety aspects of the facility. Mr. Ed Natt, attorney for the petitioner, advised that he had requested a continuance by letter, and was not prepared to go forward since the staff report was not received until after the newly established deadline for automatic continuances enacted by the Board. He advised that the request for a continuance must be in before the staff report comes out. He advised that the petitioner would like an opportunity to meet with the neighbors. In response to Supervisor McGraw~s concern about having a second public hearing in the event of a continuance, Mr. Mahoney advised that the board could hear comments tonight but defer a decision until the petitioner has an opportunity make a presentation. It was the consensus of the board to proceed with the public hearing. ~ Darlene Hess 2882 Carvins Code Road Salem, presented a petition signed by 150 citizens opposed to the shooting range because of the safety, noise, and November 13, 1990 '~ ~~ dogs allowed under these circumstances, enforcement of that particular aspect of the zoning law be deferred until the board receives a report from staff regarding the appropriate number of dogs for households to keep and take formal action. Supervisor Eddy restated his motion that enforcement of this particular case be deferred until the staff reports back to the board on all aspects of the issue of number of dogs and zoning classifications. The motion resulted in a tie vote and the County Attorney ruled that the decision should be brought back to the next board meeting for vote. AYES: Supervisor Eddy, Nickens NAYS: Supervisor McGraw, Johnson ABSENT: Supervisor Robers IN RE: ADJOIIRNMENT TO SIINDAY, NOVEMBER 18, 1990 AT THE HOMESTEAD FOR THE VIRGINIA ASSOCIATION OF COIINTIES ANNIIAL CONFERENCE, MONDAY. NOVEMBER 26, 1990, AT 3 P.M. FOR A WORK SESSION WITH STAFF, AND TO 8:00 A.M. FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 30, 1990 AT THE SIINNYBROOR INN FOR THE PIIRPOSE OF A BREARFAST MEETING WITH AREA LEGISLATORB At 7:55 p.m., Supervisor Nickens moved to adjourn to Sunday, November 18, 1990, at The Homestead; Monday, November 26, 1990, at 3:00 p.m. for a work session with staff, and Friday, November 30, 1990, at 8:00 a.m. for a breakfast meeting with area legislators. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Robers Richard W. Robers, Chairman ~.,"` November 2 6 19 9 0 ~ ~l ~! Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Roanoke County Administration Center 3738 Brambleton Avenue, SW Roanoke, Virginia 24018 November 26, 1990 The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, met this day at the Roanoke County Administration Center, this being an adjourned meeting from November 13, 1990 for the purpose of a work session. IN RE: CALL TO ORDER Chairman Robers called the meeting to order at 3:04 p.m. MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Richard Robers, Vice Chairman Steven A. McGraw, Supervisors Lee B. Eddy, Bob L. Johnson, Harry C. Nickens MEMBERS ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: • Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator; John R. Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator of Community Services and Development; Don M. Myers, Assistant County Administrator for Management Services; Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney, Mary H. Allen, Clerk to the Board; Anne Marie Green, Information Officer, Reta Busher, Director of Management and Budget, Diane Hyatt, Director of Finance; Clifford Craig, Director of Utilities r~, .~ November 26 1990 ~'~ separate regional authorities for water, sewer and landfill. Mr. Hodge responded that he would asked the County's financial consultant. Supervisor Nickens suggested that the Roanoke County Resource Authority go on record in requesting the state for an extension of time and increase in capacity for use of the current landfill. He further suggested that a letter from the Board of Supervisors be sent to the others localities participating in the current Landfill Board expressing concern about Landfill Board member John Parrott's recent employment with Olver and Associates, the landfill consultant. Following discussion on allowing other localities to join the County landfill, Mr. Hodge advised he will set up a meeting of the Landfill Citizens Advisory Committee to discuss this issue. Supervisor Nickens suggested that inclusion of a surcharge to the host locality should be considered in the negotiations. Mr. Hubbard presented the proposed timetable for the landfill. He advised that this will go to the bond market in November 1991 and the projected construction date is July 1993. IN RE: SEWAGE TREATMENT Clifford Craig, Director of Utilities updated the board members on negotiations with Roanoke City on the sewage treatment plant. The participating localities have held two meetings. Roanoke City's primary need is the sewage treatment plant, while r ~? ~ ra November 26, 1990 Nickens reminded the staff that the Therapeutics Program should be budgeted on a cost sharing basis with participating localities in future budgets. Director of Finance Diane Hyatt announced she will set up an Audit Committee meeting in December. 2. School Budget: Dr. Bayes Wilson, School Superintendent, was present and updated the Board members on future construction plans. He advised that the projected 1991-92 enrollment is estimated at 13,200. He further advised that the state does not plan any new mandates and may even reduce current mandates. 3. State school budget reductions Dr. Wilson advised that the $60,000 duty free lunch will be eliminated and the estimated reduction of state funds is $1.5 to $2 million plus state tax. Dr. Wilson also announced that Roanoke City is requesting legislation to share state funding for students who live in one locality and attend school in another locality. Currently 700 students from outside Roanoke County attend County schools with funding of $1200 per student. The funds would be eliminated if this legislation is passed. IN RE: RECESS Chairman Robers declared a dinner recess at 6:20 p.m. Supervisor Johnson was absent from 6:00 p.m., and Supervisor .- November 2 6 19 9 0 facility with 300 beds. Construction costs are estimated at $12 million with state funding of $6 million. Roanoke County's share would be $1 million. There was board consensus to continue discussion with the other localities and report progress back to the board members. IN RE: REDISTRICTING County Attorney Paul Mahoney recommended that a committee be established consisting of Planning Director Terry Harrington, Registrar Elizabeth Leah and himself to begin the redistricting process. He announced there will be a public hearing on the issue at the January 22, 1991 board meeting. He asked for board direction on how they should proceed. Following discussion, there was board consensus to correct errors made in past redistricting by splitting subdivisions and school districts between magisterial district. The Board members also supported a study of the possibility of adding an at-large chairman and at-large vice chairman .• Supervisor Nickens also suggested that the committee work with the Fifth Planning District Commission. IN RE: OTHER ISSIIES 1. Cable television negotiations with Cox Cable: Supervisor McGraw updated the board members on negotiations and announced there will be a meeting on November 28. He reported that it may be necessary to adopt an ordinance November 26, 1990 ~ ~~ The Board members directed Mr. Hodge to place an item on the December 4, 1990 agenda allocating matching funds for the Virginia Department of Transportation revenue sharing program. IN RE: ADJOIIRNMENT At 8:50 p.m., Chairman Robers adjourned the meeting to November 30, 1990 at 8:00 a.m. at Sunnybrook Inn for the purpose of a legislative breakfast. Richard W. Robers, Chairman ~ ~ r November 3 0 19 9 0 __ _ __.____ __ Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Roanoke County Administration Center 3738 Brambleton Avenue, SW Roanoke, Virginia 24018 November 30, 1990 The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, met this day at the Sunnybrook Inn, 7342 Plantation Road N. W., this being an adjourned meeting from November 26, 1990 for the purpose of presenting Roanoke County's legislative requests to the Roanoke Valley legislators. IN RE: CALL TO ORDER Chairman Robers called the meeting to order at 8:05 a.m. MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Richard Robers, Vice Chairman Steven A. McGraw, Supervisors Lee B. Eddy, Bob L. Johnson, Harry C. Nickens MEMBERS ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator; Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney, Anne Marie Green, Information Officer OTHERS PRESENT: Delegates C. Richard Cranwell, Clifton A. Woodrum, A. Victor Thomas, Beverly Lambert, representing G. Steven Agee, State Senator C. Granger MacFarlane ,~ ~. November 30 1990 __________---____------ ______ or overrule a decision of a local governing body in a land use matter except in case of fraud or direction violation of law. 9. Authorization for the local governing body to impose up to a ten percent tax on the gross receipts of all bingo games and raffles. Delegate Cranwell questioned the stormwater utility fee request and was informed the County did not wish to make it retroactive. There was a discussion on funding and building the forensic laboratory. Delegate Cranwell advised that state redistricting will be held the first two weeks of April. Those present discussed methods of keeping better count of residents. IN RE: ADJOIIRNMENT At 9:00 a.m., the meeting was adjourned. Richard W. Robers, Chairman ~, ACTION NO. A-121890-4.a ITEM NUMBER '~ 1 ' "'~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: December 18, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: Confirmation of Committee Appointments to the Grievance Panel, the Library Board and the Recycling Advisory Committee, and Ratification of appointment to the Mental Health Services of the Roanoke Valley Board of Directors COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The following nominations were made at the December 4, 1990 meeting and should be confirmed by the Board of Supervisors: Grievance Panel Supervisor N~ckens nominated R. Vincent Reynolds to serve a two- year term which will expire September 10, 1992. Library Board Supervisor Robers nominated Leesa Dalton to another four-year .term representing the Cave Spring Magisterial District. Her term will expire December 31, 1994. Recycling Advisory Committee Supervisor Eddy nominated James Conner to represent the business community. Ratification of A ointment to the Mental Health Services of the Roanoke Valley Board of Directors The term of appointment of Mr. Henry Woodward, member at- large, will expire on December 31, 1990. The Board of Directors has recommended the appointment of Mrs. Harriette Shivers for a three- year appointment as a member at large. All five participating localities must ratify the appointment. See the attached letter. •' .•. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the above nominations be confirmed. cc: SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: Mary H. Allen Elmer C. Hodge Clerk to the Board County Administrator ------------------------------------ ACTION VOTE Approved (x) Motion by: Bob L. Johnson Denied ( ) No Yes Abs Received ( ) Eddy x Referred ( ) Johnson x To ( ) McGraw x Nickens x Robers x File Grievance Panel File Library Board File Recycling Advisory Committee File Mental Health Services of the Roanoek Valley Board of Directors File - -------- ----------- ~.>m E - __- _ --- i ,~~~ ~ _: s_:. eC .N _ . ~. December 11, 1990 i i Richard W. Robers, Chairman Roanoke County Board of Supervisors ' _ P. 0. Box 29800 ' Roanoke, VA 24018 ' z~ ~, `~'~~ Dear Mr. Robers: According to our records Mr. Henr Woodward' Y s term of appointment to Mental Health Services of the Roanoke Valley Board of Directors as a member r~-V,,~~~IF. [i.arn~>~ at-large will expire on December 31, 1990. a ,.~_ '~"e~^°''r°°~~ At the December 6, 1990, Board of Directors' iheln,at.srephens meeting a resolution was passed to recommend Mrs. ~•~~~~~« Harriette Shivers, 4946 Topping Hill Drive, S. W., John M. Hudgins. Jr. ROanOke Vlr ginia, for a three year term as a `~~'~t°"•' member at-larye beginning January 1, 1991. Rita J. Gliniecki '~ `"~"~'~°~D`~eC`°r The bylaws of the Board require that members ' =rea p Roesse~. Jr.. pt,.r~. at-large be recommended by the Board to the five participating localities. All five local governments must ratify the appointment. Your attention to this matter will be very much appreciated. Sincerely, Fred P. Roessel, Jr., Ph. D. Executive Director FPRjr:cd C: Elmer C. Hodge Mary Allen Harriette Shivers I~'IENTAL HEALTH SERL'ICES OF THE ROANOKE VALLEY EXECUTIVE OFFICES, 301 Efm Avenue, S.L'J., Roanoke, Virginia 24016-4026-(703) 34~-9841 Serving the Counties of Botetourt, Cr«ig and Roanoke and the Cities of Roanoke and Salem ACTION NO. A-121890-4.b ITEM NUMBER ~ . AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: December 18, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: Request for approval of a 50/50 Raffle Permit for the Roanoke County School Food Service Chapter COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Roanoke County School Food Service Chapter has requested to hold 50/50 raffles on the following dates: - January 17, February 21, April 18, May 10, The application has been reviewed with the Commissioner of Revenue and he recommends that it be approved. The application is on file in the Clerk's Office. The organization has paid the $25.00 fee. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the application for a 50/50 Raffle Permit be approved. SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: Mary H. Allen Elmer C. Hodge Clerk to the Board County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved (x) Motion by: Bob L. Johnson No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Eddy ~ Received ( ) Johnson x /-~=~ Referred ( ) To ( ) McGraw x Nickens x Robers x cc: File Bingo/Raffle File ~'~ COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA COMMISSIONER OF THE REVENUE i APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO CONDUCT RAFFLES OR BINGO Application is hereby made for a bingo game or raffle permit. This application is made subject to all County and State laws, ordinances, rules, and regulations now in force, or that may be enacted hereafter and which are hereby agreed to by the under- signed applicant and which shall be deemed a condition under which this permit is issued. All applicants should exercise extreme care to ensure the accura- cy of their responses to the following questions. Bingo games and raffles are strictly regulated by Title 18.2-340.1 et. s__eg. of the criminal statutes of the Virginia Code, and by Section 4-86 et. seg. of the Roanoke County Code. These laws authorize the County Board of Supervisors to conduct a reasonable investiga- tion prior to granting a bingo or raffle permit. -he Board has sixty days from the filing of an application to gr~o.r deny the permit. The Board may deny, suspend, or revoke the permit of any organization found not to be in strict compliance with county and state law. Any person violating county or state regulations concerning these permits st-aall be guilty of a Class 1 misdemeanor. Any person who uses any part of the gross receipts from bingo or raffles for any purpose other than the lawful religious, charitable, community, or educational purposes for which the organization is specifi- cally organized, except for reasonable operating expenses, shall be guilty of a Class 6 felony. THIS APPLICATION IS FOR: (check one) RAFFLE PERMIT I,l ~v/`~~~ BINGO GAMES Name of Organization j~p.~n;,~/l~ noun ~~/ ~~~ aaL Foo~~ S'~R.v:~~ C'Li g/~fP.e Street Address ,~"-,.~ G> ~oLL ~<p ,9 UG Mailing Address (~,~~ ~ ) City, State, Zip Code S~ /vf„ (/ . ~ ~/S3 Purpose and Type of Organization,}~,do~e,.~s,oh.9L s~,Poth ~1 ~~~~te/~ :~~ When was the organization founded? /~ J~ ~S'~,PCV~'~ 1 l -~ Roanoke County meeting place3,~ ,Cn ,Qa,pfa~wwi %rh/lit'~G C°P~7~l.G Has organization been in existence in Roanoke County for two con- tinuous years? YES ,/ NO Is the organization non-profit? YES / NO Indicate Federal Identification Number # ~`~O~~s,fs~d Attach copy of IRS Tax Exemption letter. Officers of the Organization: President:~lL/~ ,~/,*~/1/•1,~.(ASS vice-President f--l~ //,~;~,/ Address : ,~ ~~~~ta.. ~'~~ Address : ~; ~ a ~~' /~eCL ,1~~. Secretary : ~'~i P,P/L P~ ~-/~jLi~/,•9./ Treasurer : J3af/r~ ~/ L°~~~~ Address : ~L~ ~ yj7/~L~ t~C~U~/ .~y ~G Address : ~Sr' Sd~ ~®~e ,t~~• /~ f-'-~. ~A c°~n . %%f1~o? ~~~.~ . /~ nrre'~ . U11. ~ yar' Member authorized to be responsible for Raffle or Bingo opera- tions: Name/~A.C',~hs~ ~P,~,~~LC. w~;,f,~- Home Addressl-~-~-~ /,~~L ~,~~~-~ ~A~o/l{ ~j°,~• a~JOi% ~~~ ~'o«.es~- ,qU~- Phone~~;~?,/y</D Bus. Phone`j~~'- ~S~'S~ A COMPLETE LIST OF THE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF CURRENT MEMBER- SHIP MUST BE FURNISHED WITH THIS APPLICATION. Specific location where Raffle or Bingo Game is to be conducted. ~o~Cr'en (,/,9GL e~ ~,e. ,C.'A~',~Lz /r1n/ ~ /9~'/ ~ ~ Buir~u~ • ,~o~'rd ~" .~ , ~~ ~isfn », /=ed ~i~ rd,oe:~ iB~ RAFFLES: Date of Drawing /Y),~~ rp i99~ Time of Drawing ~~~r BINGO: Days of Week & Hours of Activity: Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday From To From To From To From To From To From To From To 2 ~ n r , /"C '~ State specifically how the proceeds from the 8.~go/Raffle will be used...-'List in detail the planned or intended use of the proceeds. Us estimates amounts if necessary. ~~ .a~~.~/ - ~ ,.,ate ..~.. ,~' ..~ ~ ~~ ~~~-`'~i~,,e-J~,t,4~.. ~,/~.tA• ,vt ,cL,~~ ~ ~ ~ rue. ~~,.~ ~f~-rte. ~f .~;~ ~~~~~'&!/~l~C~rua'l' ~ ~ .t~1~-e, c'~. ~~ ~~~ 3 ~-•~ 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 o a o 0 0 0 N tp ~ LJt O~ N Ut ut Ut Ut Cri Ut Ut U, Ut CD --' O O .J.. CO O 07 C'1 O ~ Q~ O O O Ul ~ W N O U>t N ~ f-+ ~-+ [V N r-+ N r-+ ~-+ O OD 1~ LD CO O V 00 CD .P O [D rA CD •P t0 t0 O -.+ ,ia C1D Cn N W t-+ CO O N N ob t0 ¢t \ Jp 1~ lD N ~z cn O o• 0 0 0 0 U~ Vt Ut Ut O~ s ~ O --` N N N CD .{:.. O W .~ ..- J d ~i: C7 a A a q0 C Gd C W ~! bd ~ Cd O Cz1 O qD O Cd O W U7 ~-+ a1 1 W CV bD Y Y ' Y z ~ d H C~~ Y r ~ O r ~ C 7 [17 Y Y L Y H ~ d r ~ ~ ~ ~ H H m H x H z x x o X z C J] o rr, CJ / ~ x [z7 r k~ z .~ ~ z b ~ z to z ~. ~ w r O ~ H Cn 0 ~ x G a x b r y K a ~ o r n ~ c~ a x :~ ~ r z d o w o H z •~: ~ c r z x, ~ ° ~'' y y o y z o ~ rr, x ~ ~ x ~ r~ c~ r r r ra r ~ H ~ r ii y c -~ ~ ~ L ~ t~ z 7- o c~ r' -_' o ' ~' d ~ r~ z b H y ~ ~ b ~ z w • . ~ a ra r r 00 O w W v ~+ U, ip rn Ut N CD ~. W w ~t r-~ 00 W U, rn + U, au U, rn ~ .+.. W ~ rn Y Cn O ~ U, F-~ 00 .G+ O Cn N U, Ut ,La h-+ r- W W 'f • O 00 ~-+ c0 N W t-+ ~ N O U, LV 1--~ Ut ~-.+ LJ d O O tp W V ~ Ut CJt N J Cn Qt N O A a H x ~ ~ x 0 ~ ~u c~ O ~ Ln Y ~ ~ z o d ;~ :~ y rb b b Y -~ co ~ tin ~ ~ z ~ r~ o _z ~ r z d ~ ~ .-~ ~ ~; o O o y a7 r n a ~ y ~ ~ zn ~ b Z ~ ~ ~ O ~ x ~ H ~t7 ~ 7 Z x r a E o r c~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r o o '-' ~ o r z o d ' ~ ~° o o d d ~ d o ~: y H o ~ z LT1 C [n G ] r h7 Y O '~7 p 1 ~ t -' r H z d ~ ~ C7 H d d O r ~" ~ H H r b ~ ~ ~ d 1, ?7 x1 ~'~-, ~ ,~~ ,,x_, ~ O O C~ y O O Ctl z O ~ ~ o rh z z r ~; b b C+7 d d 1 ~; b Vi b H A7 ~7 O V`"] ~ ~ ° ° ' co z ~ ~; a a 1 ~ e c~ ~ L~ ~ ~ ~ ~. - ~ ~ C a C a C ~ C ~ C y C y C ~- C Y C Y C y C ;n .-: y a s y y a C ~ Y y -~ a H r~ N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N [V N '-' v 0 r-+ 1-' ~ o r-~ 0 ~ 0 , 0 0 0 0 ~ o o ~ O O r-+ O O b to t7D tD tp r cD r 00 r..~ cD f..., .L:. f-+ .1:.. r.r 00 Ut W r-+ c0 ~--~ 00 vt ~"' [-' Ut r+ O W 00 00 W CD U, O ~ O ~ O ~ O 1~ ~ ~.-. O O ~--~ O ~ r-~ O O O ., O O ~ O LrJ r.7 W W W W ~ O O N ti W 1-+ W O W O W O W O W O W ~ W + W W W W W C.J d .O tD CO c0 h- O ~--+ N ~ O ~ Y ''- 1-' ~-' 00 ~ ~ c~ cD o c0 o cp ~ cD o cp o cD ~ tp ~ CD cD cn c0 CO t+7 , ~ . ~ ~ ~ o ~ n b rn d7 rn bt7 rn a9 rn b7 rn W rn C!J rn C~1 a W rn b7 ~ rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn n Q7 CC1 W CO CT.7 G7 t0 W CO x Y 'b ~ o o ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o d A 1\+ ~ ~ N ~ \ N \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ ~ \ \ H ~ n O U, ,~:, W N ~--~ N O r-+ 1-•~ [rJ H C CJ1 w 0 o ca ~ DODO o 000 0 ~ ~ W °J Y 0 0 O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o cn c~ ~ n y y ~ y ~ ~ Y a ;~ a n a ui n ~' `~' ~ ~ ~.. t - ~ '9 ;i O 01 01 V c0 V O O 00 07 C7t V o Ut to N ~_." O O CTt 07 r-+ c7) .C. O O O O '~ r-+ O Ut Ot N Ut O O Ut Q1 r-+ Cp Q> 0 Ut 01 N ~~ ~7 r-~ N N O O C)t) O Ut O~ ~-+ ~ '..n 0 CTt Qt N ~-+ W o U~ ~ O F-+ ~> O U Ut C7) N >> v ~ N 00 N O CD o Ut O r-+ ca Ut o v v 00 O O O O ~ O cD ,~ O O ~. O tD W o ~ 07 H-+ co ,F. O v V O O -~] O ~ O N ~ N O ~ T ~P N V O U1 Q) .P V W s x a ao O c~ x x a ~ in o x x a z ~ a t;n 00 x a> n ~ n a~ v n o o ~ z ro ro y ~' ~ z ro r o t+7 m ro r ro r ~° ro ~ ~, T1 ro ro ~, t 7 rr-~ -r, y ~, tli ~ ~ r, a, Z ~ ~ d ~ ~ ~ c~ d ~: ~7 con e c ~ x o c7 o .~ t=7 c~ Y -~ n ~ o 7: n ~ y C'l y d n ~ Y G] n a7 v ~"~3 n o ~ tom"' C" n x o 7~C a7 r t~ Y ro x ~ r d ra '. r ;~ ~..~ r~ n o~ ~ ro ~ c., ay r r~ ~ r r a ~ d ~-+ o r_ y ~-: 0 0 0 0 CrJ t'~ a Y R7 P7 a d O N H ~-+ -~ ~: Y d ~ "t ~ ~ z ,ZC fn a a z ~ ~ ~ ro ~ ~' ~ ~ ~ r~ an n c~ r~ z ~ a Y ~ ,-~ m y ~ d ran ~ a o a ~ H x cn ~ u, ~ xy r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ y ~ o ~ z CD ~ N Vt W Ut O v C N O r ~ ~ a o C C H z ~ t~ ~-• z p < ~ -C-~ i c ~ ~' o a d C C < a a a ~-+ ~ Q~ Qt N O ~. Qt Vt Ut O W .{~ V N Ut W N .f.. W ca o w o cn w vt ~-• ,.~ o V CO ~O O W N W cp .C. n 2 ~ n H c r n ~ r ~ r~ r~ ~ C+7 t~ r n a7 d ~ ~ r cron r ~ d C~] b7 U1 ~ x C'] O I xl ~ Y LTA ~ ~ C~7 E y ~, r o c r .-3 ~ y ~ .r r c~ z b~~~ d ~ r cz~ ~ ~ ~ o n O l~ r r ~ cz a' ~ ~ e d a O F C7 L rr r z j' [17 Ul Cz7 t7 ro ro • o a b y a ;~ a a a Y Y Y y O v O O t-+ cp ~-3 Ut c1t V I-+ W .-• o ~ U. rn o ~ ~ m O ~ O r-+ OD W O W N .b ~ O 7: d n o r ~ •~ n c -~ 0 o z y y ° o~ ~ ° n z c: t~ o o Y r ~7 ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ d y rn ~ o c„ a a H ~ ~ ~ t y t7 _' z d cn tai a c c ... O z ~ ,~~ ~ tt-~ r~ c rh y ~ ~ ~ d H 'U O f: y b y y Y y y y y a a a y N N N N N N N N N IV N N N N N N N 'N N N N N N N ,Li .A .C. .P .4. .F.. ~. .t+ .i:. ~ .F.. .1-- .C. .F. .L.. ~;+ .1:. .i-• ,~-. rG~ ~ .ta ~ ,ta ~'' ~"'' t'' r-' O r-~ O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O ~+ O V Ut V Ut F-+ Ut F-+ Q~ 1-+ f--~ r-+ I'' h-~ C.It ~-+ O) t-~ N F-+ F-~ ~+ F~ Vt t0 cp W cp W cp W Cb ,C. cD .L• cD .F+ .C+ c0 O Ut cD co .C.. O O tD W UI f... O .F.. .~ ~ O O O ~ O O O O O ~ O O O f--~ r-+ f--~ ~ O O r-+ O O O N Vt -.] OD N ~ v .l~-. N ~] 1--~ v N Ca .iy ~+ tb V .P CD H-+ ~'-'' N r-+ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ W W W W W W W W N W W W [V W W W W W W W W W W O O ~--~ O 00 t-+ O ~ O O I~ F+ C.Tt \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ O ~ ~ rO+ O cD cD cD GO c0 cp c0 c0 c0 O O O 00 cmj ~ cD c0 to tD rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn ~ rn w W tc to b7 0~ try c~ w o by bo tb uy to m a7 od x bti O by W l77 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 0 W V .P Ut ~P .J:. J N .L:. t-+ I--+ N O CO \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ N ~"' O i-' 1-' N N O N O W N O N N N O O W ~ O O N O V1 ,p 00 OD 00 O co cp O OD (X1 00 O O O O cp O c0 OD ca O O O cn W O v v O c0 W O c0 O O O O O O O O O~ O O O O O O O O O O O O O O ~ ~ Y Y d ~ ~ ~ ~ a a a a ~ J .~ O ~ O O) .p. -~+ O 00 O Ul O N O r~+ O 00 W N N ,~ O U~ O t-+ CD t0 O Ui O pp W O 00 Q) N O O 00 CJ1 O N O J .~] O O OJ O a U~ '~' ~] ~+ O Ui O (V ~ OJ O Q7 O) O O Q> O Cp N O W J O Ut O] N O F-+ O OJ Ui O cp r-+ O U~ 07 F-' 00 O r-+ ~ W N ~4- Cn O to .A J O W O Q) .A. O tp 00 O VI O N CJt W O Ul O) N CTI 'A. r-• N O V CJ1 p ~ ti 7 ~ r'O ~ ~ a ~ s~ a Z d ~ ~ tin e'a d ~ r-+ ~ Q ~ ~ ~v x r Fry ~ 'v ~ ~ `~ ~ z ~ ~ x ~ ~ ~ ~ r [rl ~ ~ x t:'1 ~ ~ ~ o 'I, ~ r ~ ~ y fr :~ a'~- ~ '~ H ~ ~ ~ x Y r r y ¢ r [-~ trl o :e crn o x ~ O z r ~ d x C ~ ~ a z x C d d CrJ w off C W a~ '~" d O x z Ct] O r r O a ~C O r r f-+ a •C z =J ICrf r n ~ 'C O G Y z w :~ Ctrl O C ~ ~ "U H ~ ,,.„ a y CO H H ~ O .~ "yam O t~ H ~ rr7 n r .'~~ r 'O r try Cz7 iri ~] x H x a ~ Y H ~ d r~ r ,~ ~ ~ hr ~ ~. ay ~ r ''` r d ~ x `C r~l 'S7 ~~.. z t=] x ?J x O a ~' b7 '~ [r7 a U, x ~ ~ ?c ~ '"' r r~ d ~ ~ a N CJ D C z CrJ ~ lTJ r t=7 ~ ~ -t o ~ ~ co .c. w .c- cn ~ ~ ~ v .c. a] a .c.. ~ .c.. ca o] ~ U, ~ w ~ v, --• C~ W cn r-+ O W ~ r-~ O i-+ 'Ly W H Ui O J .~. t-+ O CJl 07 N N W ~ ~-+ W N W 1-~ 00 W 00 00 N H W Cn O .P N Ut W Vt N O H to O N W O ~ r-+ ~ O ... O W .F N Ui i.J 00 W v al N z ~ ~ r N r x o r ~ ~ o ~ o ~ y ~ ~ d a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a x o t~ n ro y a ~ '° x o x ~ z --3 o rh t~ a rr ~a --~ r '-3 a o cn o ~ z ~: r~ w o o O ~ ~ ~ d z c n ~ ~ d W d Z7 ~7 z a z ~ :~ ~ H x x C ('J a < ~ n a a '-3 ~ ~ O O O ~ rn ~ Po ~ W x a F-• y c; ~ ~-+ w d ~ ~ O d C d C ~T7 r C y ~ d y d ~ O ~ ~ H a C r d a d ~ CrJ O d Z rx-i C7 ~ ty-~ d tOrJ d d C z - ad x c r d ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ d b ~ ii ~ "~ ty a ~ i z ~ V ~ ~ ~ d d '~ v~ c d ~ E ~ .. ~. a z ro ~ ~ ~ ~ y ~ ~; C C C C C C C C C ~. C > a a a a a> a a a a ;Y y y ~ y ~ ;~ y a y a a a a~ J N N N N N N N N N N N N N lV [V N N N N .P ~ ~.. .G. ~4. a+ ~ pia ~ .l.. .J:. ~C- .7-+ .i+ .~. ~J+ rP ~f-+ .ta ,N N N N l~ ~ O O O O r-+ O O f-+ t-+ O O O O O ~-+ O 'A 'A' 'A '~' J OD 00 ~F.~ O cD 00 00 W c0 .F cD OD W ,F. J ~-+ --~ J J F-+ CT -.] C.fl V CD CD .A O tp CD W CO W 4 .A N e W .P ~-+ O O O O O O O r-~ ~ O ~-+ O O F-+ O O p ~..~ ~--~ O ' ~+ N Ut O J O .P r] N ~-+ i-+ ~--~ Cn ~] Vi N i-+ O -~+ O i W N W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W \ \ 1-r O O O O O ~-+ f.. ~. F~ O -+ ~ ~ ~ ~ crD tD cD cD t0 cp c0 c0 cD cD c0 cp tp c0 cO cD CD tp O O O i-+ O t-+ f-+ O ~-+ ~-+ r-+ O O i-+ --~ O ~-+ O) O O O O) O 07 Q) O] 07 O 07 O O O 07 O O O O O O) O) O) 0~7 Od CO W Gl W a7 W U1 CO b0 b7 Cl7 CS7 W W Gd b0 W bd bd W W b7 O O O ~ ~ O ~' O O O t-+ O ~-+ ~ ~ f-+ O O O O O) t-+ cr O O ~ W r-+ O) O O ~ i-+ .P V Of O) W W O r-+ W N t-+ ~\+ F-~ W \ N N N W W h-~ ~-. ~-+ --+ O O 00 00 f-+ CD ~ .h CO CD O O O T W is tO J O Ca tD 00 00 OD 00 00 00 W 00 OD OD O O O O cD v 00 O 1] cD cp cD J v OD c0 cD W O O O O O O O O H O O O O O O O (7 ('1 n (") CJ C'1 C7 C7 C7 d Y ("1 C') d C'1 C") C] C'1 n ~ O N F.+ O ~ a n a ~ ~~~~.~ ~ -~ ~~ ,~ `;o o ~ o , Ut W O '~ a7 j ~ m O) Ut f-+ ~'~ N x 1-+ W ^-7 ~ ' ;~' ~,a N o - ~] O ~-• 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ o 0 0 0 o ti o --~ Ui W 07 U~ 1] Q1 00 U~ N ~ 6] U3 CD fJ~ N CJ1 O O Ut O~ O) F-+ cD Vl Q) cD CSC v O) t-+ T 07 Q1 tD N W 00 N 00 .P O N Cn r~ 07 N Q~ N W N N O O O N ~--' W CD O). cD OO ~-' 00 ~-~' O O O O .A 00 W N Ut 00 .L+ Cn O J ~-+ Ui ~-+ N O W Qf t ~ '' , ~~~ ~C 1 ,a '' ;. ~ ' H ~-3 H H ~ [n [n cn [n cn '~ Cn ~ Cn t"' ~ x [n x [n x ~ x cn x Cn x to x cn a ~ O F~ ~''00 ~ ~ [7 Y ~ o o ~ ~ y ~ ~-, ~-, r_, trt t~ t~ rh r~ ~ a ~ ~ z c r ~ a ~ ~ . "~ yv ~~.; y z -~ ~ r ~ t~ ~ ~v ~ ~ ~+ n ro x ~ ~: ~ d ti x ~ x ~ x ~ a~ b x b x ~ ~ ~ b ~: z r•>, r, • ~. ' ~ I .-v ', o ~ z cn o ~n x r c~ z ro o r ~--~ ~ ~ c a~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ cn ~~ ~At: z a cn r r z r d l t ;; ~ ~ j ~~ , ~ 3i/L J{~f ~~ : ,I r,~ ~' 1 ~~'~ ~ c~ ~ z 0 ;Y 7 ~v ~ cn ~ :s ~ ra r c~ G t7 :v d r~ y ~: r o ~ r_. c ,-, 'v trf 'v ~• z p c. r_. ~ ~ c~ o C7 c., O d I ~~ ~ `' r ~, ~ t Y ~ ~ Yy H N Y ~ ~ O ~-'+ CTl ~ 47 ~- G7 •C t=7 3 y tr7 G n 3 t f C" ' x tr1 Y ?o r~ ~ , r ,,,;,P~~ •< ~ «-~ x o 9 ~ a ~ ~ ~:~t; a • ~ ! z z v x y d ~ ~ ~, yam,.,,; t!i;; ~; ~' ;;~ ~ ~; `` ~~:Ia`; SL7':~ -,t+Y fT +-~ ' ' Q N N O Cn C> W N W -] W U~ N cn Q] O ~J N r~ lV .t=• O N O N O C.n N ~ W W O 7 O W .k+ Cn cD ~-+ ~-' ~ ~9 W .P F'' ; ; . ~ ; ~, ` "N• --~ . .~^q„ J d:. --+ ~ W O Cli ~] a+ ~ O ~ H N N U3 ~-+ .t:. W O ~-+ N ~ t-+ N r-+ W O ~+ 00 W f'.' .G• ~] U~ O ~ N O ~ ,~, fA W b ~] C!1 'TJ O F O ~ C] ~ ~: r f7 W W x b ~ 0 ~ ~ . . p~,~',, ~p p p ~ ~; ~ a z d O ~ t~l r C c a r r ~ C W r p ~ ~ ~ '} -~+ ae ~~ ~ z K r' ~0 tTJ u~ d r ~. --~ Z ~ d o o .'~ d C ~ ~ ° d o ~-+ CrJ z d W o O y ~ ~ ~ z n , ;; w~,( ;i ~ u~i o ~ ~ ~ ~ ci :. r_ cn o t7 O ~ o ;v o ~: ~ tb ~ a y ~-+ N --3 c ~, . ~. r c x o •-3 y ~ z m r~ c-~ y :~ ~-• z r z z ~ o ~'~ ~ a ~ r d z r~ ~ y a ~-+ C ~ ~ rh d ao a ~ ~ ~, ~ e c a 1 ~ ~ y ~ ~ ~ d z r ~ ~ ~`:i a - z o ~ c~ r7 ~ ~ d ~ m e c ~ yypp z p C ~ tr7 O Y ty ~ z z ~ d y ~ ~ d ~ ~ d ~/~ ~ ~ ~ ~ d V , V~ ~ ~ C b7 ~ a >~ ~ y a y y y <: ~- C ;,- C y C ~ C a C y C v C y C :,> C ~ C y C a C y C a C a N N N P N C N i- N 1 - N *+ N .tom N ~F.. N ~ N .L- N ~ N .4~ N ~ N ~i-. N .f-• N a.- N r7-+ N .1r N .P N .F- N ~F+ N .la N ~P ~A ~ ~ O O O ~ • O r-+ ~ - O O O O O O r O ~ ~ O O O ~ O O ~ O O • c0 t1t r 3•~ cn r-• N N lam h-~ OD F-~ N F-+ tD N CD ~ Cp f-+ CD U~ W v3 W r-+ 00 ~-+ ~ --+ 00 J tD f/ OD ~ 00 Cn W O] C7~ -- O C71 ~~ {Q Q7 N W . :ti O O O O O O O O O ~-' O O O O O ~--' O O O O O O O ~-' ~ W W O O ~ ~-+ ~ tD ~ N Q~ C.n W cn .i:.- O O] 3•-+ W ~p F-+ CO 7 -- \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W t~.] W W W W \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ tD t0 c0 cD cD c0 «> cD cD cD c.D c0 cD cD cD cD c0 c0 cD c0 cq ~ c0 ca N N `-+ t-+ Y-~ ~ r~ F-~ 1-+ O r-~ f-+ N F-+ ~ O ~ r-+ r-+ 1~ t-+ p 1-• O Q! OJ Oa 4] O) O) rn O O] rn O) O O O t7) rn rn O O O) O~ rn O O G7 W W W 07 G7 tz~ to CIJ UJ Cx7 07 Od W b7 CA W b:i ai W W W 07 G7 O r+ O O O O ~ O O ~-' ~--` O ~ O O O O O V1 N U1 U3 N U~ F-+ O a~ O ~ OD t-+ cD .f:. Cn .A V \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ W ( p O W O W O O O N O O W N ~ W W N 1-+ , O OD r+ W r-+ U 3 N N F-+ cn cn O a; O ~-' O ~ tp Q7 OD cD O~ cD 00 QJ 00 00 Oo cD 00 00 OJ cD 00 00 O Q7 OD O V O 00 CO co c0 00 O ~ v W O c0 tD a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n c c~ a t7 n d ~ ~ c7 a r~ ~ d c: ;y n n n :~> d y n n ~ ti Mi ~,: rM r ~ ~ - s . ~ w L. .~ _ _ - - - 0 0 0 0 0 - 1 0 ~ o Vt ~ CT ~ Ut ~ 00 r-+ ~ ~1 ~ ~ Q7 N Q~ N N N ~ - 7 W O ~ v .A ~ ~""~ N ~ cp ~P 00 i--~ ~D Cp t-+ t0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ E N ~ ~ ~ r ~ z x ~ ~ x c., 7 .t, C•7 V] z N 177 H t=7 d ~ z ~ ?~ ~ ~ y z rn -J N Cn d A .h0 ~U -~+ .P f-+ ~-+ O cO :U H ~-3 H O N cD r~ .P 00 r-r O --+ 00 N N C N W "~ tT7 W r~ ~ a o o ~ - ~ ~ ~ c ~ ~ m ~ o a ~ >e >e ae d r O r" ~ N ~ ~ ~ o tr=i ~ ~ p w N .cam "' a0 t7 ~ t i ~ r to c p < lT1 ~° ~ z t~ z c' ~ ~ ~ y e ~ o 0 c7 ' a v y a a a a a a ~;,., ,; .;; ~, ~,: ~ i N N P N ~ N ~ N .t+ N ~ N .A [V .A i- .P ~ i O ~ ~+ r-+ O O --' O to r-~ Cn cn v O cp +7 ~+ ~ W cD W W Ui V CTi tp ~1 •' t: O O O O ~-' O O a` O O~ .F~ CJ1 O i-+ N W CD Ca ~l ; W W W W W W W W W~ ~ t cD cD cD cD cO c0 c0 ' cD ~ r-+ t-+ N ~ O ~ N rr I . h* A rn rn rn rn rn rn rn . rn ~a rn w rb rz~ rb ao od t>y . i ' ~f~. O O cD ~-+ O Oa + F--~ O h-+ W W N N. .,"e.. r~ vi O O O W Cll ~;~ ~' \ \ \ \ \ \ \ ~ ,~; j~, tp 00 00 07 OD OD m ~. O OD v cD ~ v ta, y ~. ;' O O O O O O O , O' ~: N F-+ C7 ~ Y ~-+ (7 F~ Y 1-~ C7 p.~ d F~ ~ ~• F I i i' i ~ , BINGO: Complete the following: ~' Legal owner(s) of the building where BINGO is to be conducted: Name: Address: County State Zip Is the building owned by a 501-C non-profit organization? Seating capacity for each location: Parking spaces for each location: ALL RAFFLE AND BINGO APPLICANTS MUST ANSWER QUESTIONS 1 - 19 1. Gross receipts from all sources related to the operation of Bingo games or Instant Bingo by calendar quarter for prior calen- dar year period. BINGO INSTANT BINGO 1st Quarter 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter Total 1st Quarter 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter Total 2. Does your organization understand that it is a violation of law to enter into a contract with any person or firm, associa- tion, organization, partnership, or corporation of any classifica- tion whatsoever, for the purpose of organizing, managing, or con- ducting Bingo Games or Raffles? ~/~s 3. Does your organization understand that it must maintain and file complete records of receipts and disbursements pertaining to Bingo games and Raffles, and that such records are subject to audit by the Commissioner of the Revenue? y PS 4. Does your organization understand. that the Commissioner of the Revenue or his designee has the right to go upon the premises on which any organization is conducting a Bingo game or raffle, to perform unannounced audits, and to secure for audit all re- cords required to be maintained for Bingo games or raffles? ~_S 4 5. Does your organization understand that a Financial Report must be filed with the Commissioner of the Revenue on or before the first day of November of each calendar year for which a per- mit has been issued? ~ ~S 6. Does your organization understand that if gross receipts ex- ceed fifty thousand dollars during any calendar quarter, an addi- tional Financial Report must be filed for such quarter no later than sixty days following the last day of such quarter? ,l..P~ 7. Does your organization understand that the failure to file financial reports when due shall cause automatic revocation of the permit, and no such organization shall conduct any Bingo game or raffle thereafter until such report is properly filed and a new permit is obtained? ,ids 8. Does your organization understand that each Financial Report must be accompanied by a Certificate, verified under oath by the Board of Directors, that the proceeds of any Bingo game or raffle have been used for these lawful, religious,~charitable, commu- nity, or educational purposes for which the organization is spe- cifically chartered or organized, and that the operation of Bingo games or raffles have been in accordance with the provisions of Article 1.1 of Chapter 8, Title 18.2 of the Code of Virginia?~/PS 9. Does your organization understand that a one percent audit fee of the gross receipts must be paid to the County of Roanoke upon submission of the annual financial report due on or before the first of November? y ~S 10. Does your organization understand that this permit is valid only in the County of Roanoke and only at such locations, and for such dates, as are designated in the permit application? ~~.PS 11. Does your organization understand that no person, except a bona fide member of any such organization who shall have been a member of such organization for at least ninety days prior to such participation, shall participate in the management, opera- tion, or conduct of any bingo game or raffle, and no person shall receive any remuneration for participating in management, operation, or conduct of any such game or raffle?_~ ~~ 12. Has your organization attached a check for the annual permit fee in the amount of $25.00 payable to the County of Roanoke, Virginia? 13. Does your organization understand that any organization found in violation of the County Bingo and Raffle Ordinance or §18.2- 340.10 of the Code of Virginia authorizing this permit is subject to having such permit revoked and any person, shareholder, agent, member o.r employee of such organization who violates the above to having such permit revoked and any person, shareholder, agent, member or employee of such organization who violates the above referenced Codes may be guilty of a felony? vP 5 14. Has your organization attached a complete list of its member- ship to this application form? V PS 15. Has your organization attached a copy of its bylaws to this application form? ,GPs 16. Has the organization been declared exempt from property taxa- tion under the Virginia Constitution or statutes? PS If yes, state whether exemption is for real, perso al property, or both and identify exempt property. 17. State the specific type and purpose of the organization. C %rJ Plrn b ears © ~ ~l e ~~ ~Ah~~~~i~-, AR e -~'~~-/ ~,ev~~-G_~~,~~r ~~ . z 18. Is this organization incorporated in Virginia? ~ P If yes, name and address of Registered Agent: 19. Is the organization registered with the Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Affairs pursuant to the Charitable Solicitations Act, Section 57-48 of the Virginia Code? h ~ (If so, attach copy of registration.) Has the organization been granted an exemption from registration by the Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Affairs? i'/y (If so, attach copy of exemption.) ALL RAFFLE APPLICANTS DESCRIBE THE ARTICLES TO BE RAFFLED, VALUE OF SUCH ARTICLES, AND PROCEED TO NOTARIZATION. Article Description Fair Market Value /•~~.~v ~r-o. ~v ~,~ . o 0 ~a~s-d /fit (~~'a-c~f- (~/if~/~~~.~ l~1Pe~~i~~J <G~~~~•P fI /~ZE'r~i!` 6 ALL BINGO APPLICANTS MUST ANSWER QUESTIONS 20 - 27 BEFORE NOTARIZATION RAFFLE APPLICANTS, GO TO NOTARIZATION. 20. Does your organization understand that the bingo games shall not be conducted more frequently. than two calendar days in any calendar week? 21. Does your organization understand that it is .required to keep complete records of the bingo game. These records based on §18.2- 340.6 of the Code of Virginia and §4.98 of Roanoke County Code must include the following: a. A record of the date, quantity, and card value of instant bingo supplies purchased, as well as the name and address of the supplier of such instant bingo supplies, and written invoice or receipt is also required for each purchase of in- stant bingo supplies? b. A record in writing of the dates on which Bingo is played, the number of people in attendance on each date, and the amount of receipts and prizes on each day? (These records must be retained for three years.) c. A record of the name and address of each individual to whom a door prize, regular or special Bingo game prize or jackpot from the playing of Bingo is awarded? d. A complete and itemized record of all receipts and disburse- ments which support, and that agree with, the quarterly and annual reports required to be filed, and that these records must be maintained in reasonable order to permit audit? 22. Does your organization understand that instant Bingo may only be conducted at such time as regular Bingo game is in progress, and only at such locations and at such times as are specified in this application? 23. Does your organization understand that the gross receipts in the course of a reporting year from the playing of instant Bingo may not exceed 33 1/3$ of the gross receipts of an organization's Bingo operation? 24. Does your organization understand it may not sell an instant Bingo card to an individual below sixteen years of age? 25. Does your organization understand that an organization whose gross receipts from all bingo operations that exceed or are ex- pected to exceed $75,000 in any calendar year shall have been granted tax-exempt status pursuant to Section 501 C of the United States Internal Revenue Service? (Certificate must be attached.) 7 26. Does your organization understand that a Certificate of Occu- pancy must be obtained or be on file which authorizes this use at the proposed location? 27. Does your organization understand that awards or prize money or merchandise valued in excess of the following amounts are illegal? a. No door prize shall exceed twenty-five dollars. b. No regular Bingo or special Bingo game shall exceed One Hund- red dollars. c. No jackpot of any nature whatsoever shall exceed One Thousand Dollars, nor shall the total amount of jackpot prizes awarded in any one calendar day exceed One Thousand Dollars. NOTARIZATION: THE FOLLOWING OATH MUST BE TAREN BY ALL APPLICANTS I hereby swear or affirm under the penalties of perjury as set forth in X18.2 of the Code of Virginia, that all of the above statements are true to the best of my knowledge, information, and beliefs. All questions have been answered. Signed by: ame Title Home Address~~~~~/a,- Subscribed and sworn before me, this aq~ day of ( -_ 19~ a~~~~ My commission expires: ~~ c~_~~ 193 Notary Public RETURN THIS COMPLETED APPLICATION T0: COMMISSIONER OF THE REVENUE P.O. Box 20409 Roanoke, VA 24018-0513 8 ~ `. `~ NOT VALID UNLESS COUNTERSIGNED The above application, having been found in due form, is approved and issued to the applicant to have effect until December 31st of this calendar year. Date Commi sinner o the evenue The above application is not approved. Date Commissioner of the Revenue 9 ACTION NO. A-121890-4.c ITEM NUMBER ~~ AT A REGULAR HELDIAT THE ROANOKERD OUNTY ADMINISTRATIONROCENTER COUNTY, VIRGINIA MEETING DATE: December 18, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: Regersoff Moose Lodge 284 Bingo Permit for the Loyal Ord COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUI~IARY OF INFORMATION The Loyal Order of Moose Lodge No. 284 has requested a Bingo Permit for calendar year 1991. The application has been reviewed with the Commlication is on file and he recommends that it be approved. The app in the Clerk's Office. The organization has paid the $25.00 fee. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the application for a Bingo Permit be approved. SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: Mary H. Allen Elmer C. Hodge Clerk to the Board County Administrator -------------------------ACTION----------- VOTE Motion b Bob L. Johnson No Yes Abstain Approved (x) y' Eddy x Denied ( ) J hnson x Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) cc: File Bingo/Raffle File 0 McGraw x Nickens x Robers x - ~~ COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA COMMISSIONER OF THE REVENUE APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO CONDUCT RAFFLES C+R BINGO Application is hereby made for a bingo game or raffle permit. This application is made subject to all County and State laws, ordinances, rules, and regulations now lreedcto by tthe undebe enacted hereafter and which are hereby ag signed applicant and which shall be deemed a condition under which this permit is issued. - -- All applicants sho+~ld exercise extreme care to ensxre the accura- cy of_ their respc~n:~es to tre ulat d bngT~tle 18 2S 34081 n et ~ Soes anal raffles are strictly g y of_ the criminal statutes of_ the Virginia Code• claws authorise 4-96 et. seg. of the Roanoke County Code. Then' the County Board of Supervisors to conduct a reasor,.able investiga- tion prior to granting a bingo or ra.Efle permitr~ntTOe deny the sixty days from the filing of an application to g Prmit of any permit. The Board may deny, suspend, or rliancEtwith county and organization found not to be in strict comp state law. Any person violating county or state regulations concererson hwho permits shall be guilty of a Class 1 misdemeanor. Any p ixses any part of the gross receipts from bingo or raffcommunityy purpose other than the lawful religious, charitah]_e, or educational p+~~~poses for which the organiz.-ton is specifi- cally organized, ex~~ept for reasonable operating expenses, shall be guilty of a Class 6 felony. THIS APPLICATION IS FOR: (check one) ~ ~~~ ~~ RAFFLE PERMIT BINGO GAMES R Name of Organization Loyal Order of Ploose Lodge ~k284 Street Address 3233 Catawba Valley Drive, Salen, VA 24153 Mailing Address P. 0. Box 538 City, State, 7,ip Cade Salem., VA 24153 Purpose and Type of. Organization Fraternal Organization When was the organization founded? 1915 1 ~^ Roanoke County meeting place? Pioose Horne Has organization been X n existence in Roanoke County for two con- tinuous years? YES NO r o f i t? Y E S ~ NO_________ Is the organization non-p Indicate Federal Identification Number # 54-0287492 Attach copy of IRS Wax Exemption letter. Officers of the Organization: r r' Tlavidcnn Vice-President__~r rT T~„rr - Preslderit: ('larPnrP 1759 Pomeroy Road Address: 30 Birch Drive Address: --~- Salem, VA 24153 Blue Ridge, VA 24064 ------- - Secretary:Paul J. 47hittemore Treasurer: John E. Wade Address • 1741 Elbert Drive SW Address : 7104 Woods Crossing Drive SFT Roanoke, VA 24018 Roanoke, VA 24014 Member authorized to be responsible for Raffle or Bingo opera- tions: Name James E. Garlick Home Address 705 Hemlock Road, Salem, VA 24153 Phone 343-3123 Bus . Phone 344-7363 A COMPLETE LISTNO HE HWITHMTHIS NAPPLDCATIONS OF CURRENT MEMBER- SHIP MUST BE FUR Specific location where Raffle or Bingo Game is to be conducted. Time of Drawing RAFFLES: Date of Drawing ~ '7 ~l BINGO: Days of WEek & Hours of Activity: ~^~y, z'+--~'_ -- Sunday From To e .. ~-Monda From ,~_ To ~~,~, y To_____- Tuesday From Wednesday From To x Thursday From T Friday From Saturday From To_______ 2 ky State specificaltailothehelannedeor intended usegofRthelproceedse used. .List in de P Use estimates amounts if necessary. The proceeds of our Bingo operation will be used for the purpose of donations to Civic Organizations, local, state, and national, and to maintain our Bingo operation. 3 / --~ ~ ~ BINGO: Complete the following: Legal owner(s) of the building where BINGO is to be conducted: Name: Loyal Order of Moose, Lodge ~k284 Address : 3233 Catawba Valley Drive, Salem, VA 24153 County Roanoke State VA Zip 24153 Is the building owned by a 501-C non-profit organization? Yes Seating capacity f_~;: each location: 700 Parking spaces for each location: 700 ALL RAFFLE AND BINGO APPLICANTS MUST ANSWER t~U~S`PIONS 1 - 19 1. Gross receipts From all sources related to the operation of Bingo games or Instant Bingo by calendar quarter -or prior calen- dar year period. BINGO INSTANT BINGO 1st Quarter$`~7,561.00 1st Quarter $16,165,60 2nd Quarter$86,850.32 3rd Qizarter$82,055.00 4th Quarter Total $266,466.32 2nd Quarter $12,513.60 3rd Quarter $14,328.40 4th Quarter Total $ 43,007.60 2. Does your organization understand that it iti~ a violation of law to enter into a contract with any person or firm, associa- tion, organization, partnership, or corporation o.r any classifica- tion whatsoever, for_ the purpose of organizing, managing, or con- ducting Bingo Games or Raffles? yes 3. Does your organization understand that it rnust maintain and file complete records of receipts and disbursements pertaining to Bingogames and Raffles, and that such records are subject to audit by the Commissioner of the Revenue? Yes 4. Does your organization understand that the Commissioner of_ the Revenue or his designee has ttie right to go upon the premises on which any organization is conducting a Bingo c;~me or raffle, to perform unannounced audits, and to secure for- audit all re- cords required to be maintained for Bingo games or ~~affles? Yes 4 5. Does your organization understand that a 1~i;~ancial Report must be filed with the Commissioner of the Revenue on or before the first day of November of each calendar year for which a per- mit has been issuQd? Yes 6. Does your organization understand that if gross receipts ex- ceed fifty thousand dollars during any calendar quarter, an addi- tional Financial R=.port must be filed for such quarter no later than sixty days following the last day of such gaar_ter? Yes 7. Does your organization understand that the failure to file financial reports when due shall cause automatic revocation of the permit, and no such organization shall cond~~ct any Bingo_,game or raffle thereafter until such report is properly filed~"and a new permit is obtained? Yes 8. Does your organization understand that each Financial Report must be accompanied by a Certificate, verified under oath by the Board of Directors, that the proceeds of any Bingo game or raffle have been used For these lawful, religious, cr~~~r_itable, commu- nity, or educational purposes for which the org..in.ization is spe- cifically chartered or organized, and that the operation of Bingo games or raffles have been in accordance with the provisions of Article 1.1 of Chapter 8, Title 18.2 of_ the Code of Virginia?yes 9. Does your organization understand that a one percent audit fee of the gross receipts must be paid to the County of Roanoke upon submission of the annual financial report duF+ on or_ before the first of Novem~er? Yes 10. Does your organization understand that tha.s permit is valid only in the County of Roanoke and only at such locations, and for such dates, as are designated in the permit application? 1'es 11. Does your organization understand that nc; person, exceot a bona fide member of any such organization who shall have been a member of such organization for at least ninety days prior to such participation, shall participate in the management, opera- tion, or conduct of_ any bingo game or raffle, and no person shall receive any remuneration for participating in ,management, operation, or conduct of any such game or raffle? Yes 12. Has your organization attached a check for the annual permit fee in the amount of $25.00 payable to the Cour~~ of Roanoke, Virginia? Yes 13. Does your organization understand that any o>ganization found in violation of the County Bingo and Raffle Or,iirr?nce or X18.2- 340.10 of the Code of_ Virginia authorizing this ;~F:rmit is subject to having such permit revoked and any person, shar~~~;o7_der, agent, member or employee of such organization who vio~!_~~tes the above to having such permit revoked and any person, sh~.~~eholder, agent, member or employeE~ of such organization who v.olates the above referenced Codes ma~~ be guilty of a felony? Yes ___ 5 14. Has your organization attached a complete list of its member- ship to this application form? YPS 15. Has your organization attached a copy of its bylaws to this application form? ves 16. Has the organization been declared exempt from property taxa- tion under the Virginia Constitution or statutes? Yes If yes, state whether exemption is for real, personal property, or both and identify exempt property. Real Estate 3233 Catawba Valley Drive _a -" .- SA~Pm_ UQ 17. State the specific type and purpose of the org~~nization. Fraternal - Nonprofit - Charitable 18. Is this organization incorporated in Virginia?_ Yes If yes, name ,and address of Registered Agent: Paul J. Whittemore P. 0. Box 538 Salem, VA 24153 19. Is the organization registered with the Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Af Eairs pursuant to t~t~:~ Charitable Solicitations Act, Section 57-48 of the Virginia Cede? No (If so, attach copy of registration.) Has the organization been granted an exemption from registration by the Virginia Department of Agriculture and C:~asumer Affairs? No (If so, attach copy of exemption.) ALL RAFFLE APPLICANTS DESCRIBE THE ARTICLES TO BE RAFFLED, VALUE OF SUCH ARTICLES, AND PROCEED TO NOTARIZATION. Article Description Fair Market Value 6 ALL BINGO APPLICANTS MUST ANSWER QUESTIONS 20 - 27 BEFORE NOTARIZATION RAFFLE APPLICANTS, GO TO NOTARIZATION. 20. Does your organization understand that the bingo games sha_tl not be conducted more frequently than two calendar days in any calendar week? Yes 21. Does your organization understand that it is required to keep complete records of the bingo game. These records based on §18.2- 340.6 of the Code of Virginia and X4.98 of Roanoke County, Code must include the following: a. A record of the date, quantity, and card ual>~te of instant bingo supplies purchased, as well as the name and address of the supplier oL- such instant bingo supplies, and written invoice or receipt is also required for each pu.r_chase of in- stant bingo supplies? Yes b. A record in writing of the dates on which Bingo is played, the number of people in attendance on each date, and the amount of receipts and prizes on each day? Yes (These records must be retained for three years.) c. A record of the name and address of each individual to whore a door prize, reqular or special Bingo game prize or jackpot from the playing of Bingo is awarded? _ 1'es d. A complete and itemized record of all receipi.s and disburse- ments which support, and that agree with, the quarterly and annual reports required to be filed, and that these records must be maintained in reasonable order to permit audit? yeS 22. Does your organization understand that instant Bingo may only be conducted at such time as regular Bingo game is in progress, and only at such l,~cations and at such times as are specified in this application? Yes 23. Does your organization understand that the grass receipts in the course of a reiorting year from the playing of- instant Bingo may not exceed 33 ~/3$ of the gross receipts of an o.rganization's Bingo operation? Yes 24. Does your organization understand it may r_^~ sc-.11 an instant Bingo card to an individual below sixteen years of age? Yes 25. Does your organization understand that an organization whose gross receipts from all bingo operations that exceed or are ex- pected to exceed $75,000 in any calendar year shall have been granted tax-exempt status pursuant to Section 501 C of the United States Internal Revenue Service? Yes (Certificate must: k~e attached.) 7 26. Does your organization understand that a Certificate of_ Occu- pancy must be obtained or be on file which authorizes this use at the proposed locatian? Yes 27. Does your organization understand that awards or prize money or merchandise valued in excess of the following amounts are illegal? Yes a. No door prize stlall exceed twenty-five dollars. b. No regular Bir.go or special Bingo game shall ex^eed One Hund- red dollars. c. No jackpot of any nature whatsoever shalt Exceed One Thousand Dollars, nor shall the total amount of jackpot. prizes awarded in any one calendar day exceed One Thousand Dollars. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * NOTARIZATION: THE FOLLOWING OATH MUST BE TAKEN BY ALL APPLICANTS I hereby swear or affirm under the penalties of perjury as set forth in X18.2 of_ the Code of Virginia, that a.l of_ the above statements are true to the best of my knowledge, information, and beliefs. All questions have been answered. Signed by: d ' n' _Rnx S~^lezn, VA 24153 Na e/ Title Home Address Subscribed and sworn before me, My commission expires: ~d. G~ ~~C~-~t~ ~ -, ~-~ ~ ~'~' this day of__~~19 ~1 _ / Notary Pu ic- RE`T'URN Tf]TS COMPLETED APPLICATION TO: COMMISSIONER OF THE REVENUE P.O. Box ?_0409 Roanoke, VA 24018-0513 8 .. NOT VALID UNLESS COUNTERSIGNED The above applic<<tion, having been found in due form, is approved and issued to the applicant to have effect until December 31st of this calendar ye~~r. Date ommiss over of he Reven e The above applica`_ion is not approved. Date Commissic~r.er of the I~~venue 9 s , ACTION NO. A-121890-4.d ITEM NUMBER ~ - ~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: December 18, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: Request for approval of a 50/50 Raffle Permit for the Loyal Order of Moose Lodge 284 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: • SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Loyal Order of Moose Lodge No. 284 has requested to hold 50/50 raffles thoughout 1991. The list of specific dates is attached. The application has been reviewed with the Commissioner of Revenue and he recommends that it be approved. The application is on file in the Clerk's Office. The organization has paid the $25.00 fee. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the application for a 50/50 Raffle Permit be approved. • SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: Mary H. Allen Elmer C. Hodge Clerk to the Board County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved (x) Motion by: Bob L. Johnson No Yes Abstain Denied ( ) Eddy x Received ( ) Johnson x Referred ( ) To ( ) cc: File Bingo/Raffle File McGraw _ Nickens x Robers x x r ROANOKE LODGE No. 284 LOYAL ORDER OF MOOSE Mailing Address: PO. Box 538, Salem, Va. 24153 _I..<_;.:; f:~{arnl.~l tr:~r7c~ i:)c:C7t_{'(°y L: r.:i t..t ii 'i:'~ CI'f i=i L~ i::t f'i C; F~: E'w~ i::: u rri i n i _-. ~:> i. c:~ ri ~ r-' {a'f ~.: Fr c F; e~ v r~-•? ri r.t I°': {:! ~3. ri C"~ I•~: [? ., 4) ri .~ ~t C? .~ f ._.. ~ j t I ~ :. Phone: 384-7172 E ~-! c, I {:~ ~:s ~ d Ea I c:~t r:~ _~ E~= fi i r'i rJ {: y ~.t r~ _~ p ~:? 7. i. e:: ,:~ I: i. c~r~ ~ -r o r` L i r-. ci o ~a n d r a ~` -F I i . ... - !7 {:::' !^ fil :L '~ ::T.: n T h {~ r~ t? '~' 7' .I. k:? ~S W :L l..t I:] ~t i' 1 E?ICI C-.:? ~d [:3 r"' ~d ~},~ F.:•.t {:~ Il i=? i:i {:1 :a tp: 7 I::: r.., 1 C~ ;::1 `v q sit f'l {~ ~_:.~~ t: t..t r~ cf .-~ ~•~ i~ ~. u t't ~.; a l" r~ c' r a ~2't-• r ~t ~=• ~:~ r"'r:•? I i ~~> ~:: ~ ci t~, ~•t I {a tea a I ~~ ~,~ {~ t_t i,. F~a q t..t i r'• r r_'1!l `y' ~l ~:~ {::I 1 '~: 7. C? 1'l tii I :i r ~ f r~ r~ rri ire t: i c.? r~ r' e u <t r~ cl :i r~ c~ t ti r_ v ~~ p ~? :t. i c: ~:~ t: i {~ r~ ~ „ }a I {::~ ~'T±{~? -.' i~' {~~: 1. ~~ r {? ~~~ 1; o r ~. l.:l. t'i'! ~~ ra ~: ::`;;w3.t:1• --:? 1. ':~~ "' ~ 1'ti c~a r! 3~: `r` ~~, t_t ,M., v~~ ~ I=~' v:i t_! 7 .J' e l}! t-! :i. '~_ t ~::r rei c:? i•` ~! :• ~~ii .T ~:~ r'i t..t ~ r~ ~~ ~= i:J f i;l •°uW.. .,t ~ ~~ I .~_v~ y u:_4.~ 4 t'I:::1 S..) q .~. {) „ .I. .L y 1`.~„ 1r'R 1:39 :'t ~~ ~'t fl •' S C u....i.. y ., '7 4 .~.. ...) y .,... ;i u:: 9 -t 9 i.~ 2 l.J q 1. ~:, q .L l:J y 1 ,•F y .~._ _~ 9 .,... .i ,f 1.1 rl E' ~_ - q _) y s ~) :f. `'' 1. i:' ~' 1 ~! 9 ~ y ~ N j-t,. "1' vJ u`! q ~ ~i iP qty ~. ~.!~ y .I..~'_: 9 1. f_}e, 1.~,.'{q ~.~ty '~~-? I`'I ~ r' C I"7 .~ , ..::: „ C:, y (,~ L'_ ..~ ~ ,..t ._,. ,._"' ~. .1~ y 1. t:t? q i.. {..? 4 .t 't L YI i ~ 17 !^ 1 .i. ^'q 1 W q a:.t .'F ., .a''~i H t_t c~ t_t ~• 'r r u':q ~ q 7 is y .L~•,?q ~.~L{7 1L) q' 1. i y u:., 1. q u.. _' y u.. y u:.. L.. ~ '!?q .:~I 11. q .1 v, „ .L ~~ q 4.. q _ _ y .,._ ..! q .,.... y ., I~i3`: Mitt?{~r~ .i. q u: q l.J e tip y ~~ 4 _ _~ .~_. : q .,... ! q ~... r y . `.i? .~q r,~ ~ 4 1 W y u.'.~ ~) y u.. ~. u_: r~ p .~:.: t'S Lodge Located From I-81, Exit 41 On SR 311, North COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA ~_~ COMMISSIONER OF `PHE REVENUE APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO CONDUCT RAFFLES OR BINGO Application is hereby made for a bingo game or raffle permit. This application :~ made subject to all County and State laws, ordinances, rules, and regulations now in force, or that may be enacted hereafter and which are hereby agreed to by the under- signed applicant and which shall be deemed a condition under which this permit is issued. All applicants should exercise extreme care to Ensure the accura- cy of their responses to the Following questions. Binq_o games and raffles are strictly regulated by Title 18.2-340.1 et. sue. of the criminal s+.atutes of_ the Virginia CodF~, and. by Section 4-86 et. se~..of the Roanoke County Code. These laws authorize the County Board of Supervisors to conduct a reasonable investiga- tion prior to granting a bingo or raffle permit. The Board has sixty days from the filing of an application to grznt or deny the permit. The Boa~c: may deny, suspend, or revoke tki~ permit of any organization found not to be in strict compliance with county and state law. Any person violating county or state regulations concerning these permits shall be guilty of a Class 1 misdemeanor. Any person who uses any part of the gross receipts from bingo or raffles for any purpose other than the lawful religious, charitable, community, or educational purposes f_or which the organi•r.ation is specifi- cally organized, ek~,ept for reasonable operatinck expenses, shall be guilty of a Class 6 felony. THIS APPLICATION IS FOR: (check one) x,~~ _ , RAFFLE PERMIT X `-- _~~ BINGO GAMES Name of Organization Loyal Order of Moose Lode ~~284 ___ Street Address 3233 Catawba Valley Drive Mailing Address~_p Box 538 City, State, 7,in Cc~~e Saler7, VA 24153 Purpose and Type of Organization Fraternal Organization When was the organization founded? 1915 1 Roanoke County meeting place? Moose Home Has organization been in existence in Roanoke County for two con- tinuous years? YES X NO Is the organization non-profit? YES X Indicate Federal Identification Number # Attach copy of IRS Tax Exemption letter. Officers of the O.raanization: President: Clarence E. Davidson Address : 1759 Pomeroy Road Vice-President Rice A. A1cPdutt Address: 30 Birch Drive Salem, VA 24153 Blue Ridge, VA 24064 Secretary: Paul J._Whittemore Treasurer: John E. Wade Address : 1741 Elbert Dr. SW Address : 7104 Woods Crossing Dr SW Roanoke, VA 24018 P.oanoke, VA 24014 Member authorized to be r_esDOnsible for Raffle or Bingo opera- tions: Name Paul J. Whittemore Home Address 1741 Elbert Dr. SW Phone 989-0446 Bus . Phone 384-7172 A COMPLETE LIST OF THE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF CURRENT MEMBER- SHIP MUST BE FURNISHED WITH THIS APPLICATION. Specific location where Raffle or Bingo Game is to be conducted. RAFFLES: Date of Drawing See Attached Time of Drawing PM ~. ' =" ~' r BINGO: Days o.E Wee'c & Hours of Activity: ~'= Sunday From To Monday Frorn To Tuesday Frorn To Wednesday Frorn To Thursday Frorn To Friday From To Saturday From To NO 54-0287492 2 /-~ 5" State specifically how the proceeds from the Bingo/Raf_fle will be used. List in detail the planned or intended use of the proceeds. Use estimates amounts if necessary. To promote welfare and entrance education of our children and youth. To promote civic ani~ educational welfare of our community. 3 -J BINGO: Complete the following: Legal owner(s) of the building where BINGO is to be conducted: Name: Loyal Order of Moose Lodge ~k284 Address : 3233 Catawba Valley Drive, Salerl County Roanoke, State VA Zip 24153 Is the building owned by a 501-C non-profit organization? Seating capacity for each location: Parking spaces f_or each location: 700 VP C 700 ALL RAFFLE AND BINGO APPLICANTS MUST ANSWER QCiESTIONS 1 - 19 1. Gross receipt. from all sources related to the operation of Bingo games or Insp.-ant Bingo by calendar quarter fog prior_ calen- dar year period. BINGO INSTANT BINGO lst Quarter 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter lst Quarter 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter Total Total 2. Does your organization understand that it is a violation of law to enter into a contract with any person or firm, associa- tion, organization, partnership, or corporation of any classifica- tion whatsoever, for the purpose of organizing, managing, or con- ducting Bingo Game: or Raf.f_ les? Yes 3. Does your organization understand that it must maintain and file complete records of receipts and disbursements pertaining to Bingo games and Raffles, and that such records are subject to audit by the Commissioner of the Revenue? Yes 4. Does your organization understand that thE~ Commissioner_ of_ the Revenue or his designee has the right to go u~.~on the premises on which any organization is conducting a Bingo game or raffle, to perform una nnounced audits, and to secure for. audit all re- cords required to b~~ maintained for Bingo games ~~r raffles? Yes 4 5. Does your organization understand that a Financial Report must be filed with the Commissioner of the Revenue on or before the first day of November of each calendar year for which a per- mit has been issued? Yes 6. Does your organization understand that if gross receipts ex- ceed fifty thousand dollars during any calendar quarter, an addi- tional Financial Report must be filed for such quarter no later than sixty days following the last day of such quarter? Yes 7. Does your organization understand that the failure to file financial reports when due shall cause automatic revocation of the permit, and no such organization shall conduct any B_ingo_.game or raffle thereafter until such report is properly filed"and a new permit is obtained? ~7PG 8. Does your organization understand that each Financial Report must be accompanied by a Certificate, verified under oath by the Board of Directors, that the proceeds of any Bingo game or raffle have been used for these lawful, religious, charitable, commu- nity, or educational purposes for which the organization is spe- cifically chartere<1 or organized, and that the operation of Bingo games or raffles have been in accordance with file provisions of Article 1.1 of Chapter 8, Title 18.2 of the Code of Virginia?Yes 9. Does your organization understand that a one percent audit- fee of the gross receipts must be paid to the County of Roanoke upon submission of the annual financial report due on or before the first of November? Yes 10. Does your organization understand that this permit is valid only in the County of Roanoke and only at such locations, and for such dates, as are designated in the permit application? Yes 11. Does your organization understand that no person, except a bona fide member of any such organization who sha?_1 have been a member of such organization for at least ninety days prior to such participation, shall participate in the management, opera- tion, or conduct of any bingo game or raffle, and no person shall receive any remuneration for participating in management, operation, or conduct of any such game or raffle? Yes 12. Has your organization attached a check fo.r the annual permit fee in the amount of $25.00 payable to the County of Roanoke, Virginia? Yes 13. Does your organization understand that any organization found in violation of the County Bingo and Raffle Ordinance or X18.2- 340.10 of the Code o.f_ Virginia authorizing this permit is subject to having such permit revoked and any person, shareholder, agent, member or employF~e of such organization who violaters the above to having such permit revoked and any person, shareholder, agent, member or employee of such organization who violates the above referenced Codes may be guilty of a felony? Yes 5 14. Has your organi?ation attached a complete .list of its member- ship to this application form? Yes 15. Has your organization attached a copy of its bylaws to this application form? Yes 16. Has the organization been declared exempt .frozr property taxa- tion under_ the Virginia Constitution or statutes? YEs If yes, state whether exemption is for real, personal property, or both and identify exempt property. Real Estate 3233 ('atawba Va11PY Drive Salem, ~~A - 17. State the specific type and purpose of the organization. Fraternal - nnn-~_rnfi t-char; r ~hj~p 18. Is this organization incorporated in Virginia? If yes, name and address of Registered Agent: _~,3u1 1 Whi temnrP P n Rnx 5'~f~ Salem VA 415 Yes 19. Is the organization registered with the Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Affairs pursuant to the Charitable Solicitations Act, Section 57-48 of the Virginia Code? Pdo (If so, attach copy of registration.) Has the organization been granted an exemption from registration by the Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Affairs? Nn (If so, attach copy of_ exemption.) ALL RAFFLE APPLICANTS DESCRIBE THE ARTICLES TO BE RAFFLED, VALUE OF SUCH ARTICLES, AND PROCEED TO NOTARIZATION. Article Description Fair .Market Value Cash Dependant upon rlerabership attendance. 6 ALL BINGO APPLICANTS MUST ANSWER QUESTIONS 20 - 27 BEFORE NOTARIZATION RAFFLE APPLICANTS, GO TO NOTARIZATION. 20. Does your organization understand that the bingo games shall not be conducted more frequently than two calendar days in any calendar week? 21. Does your organization understand that it is required to keep complete records of the bingo game. These records based on X18.2- 340.6 of the Code of Virginia and X4.98 of Roanoke County_Code must include the following: a. A record of_ the date, quantity, and card value of instant bingo supplies purchased, as well as the name and address of the supplier of such instant bingo supplies, and written invoice or receipt is also required for each purchase of_ in- stant bingo supplies? b. A record in writing of the dates on which Eingo the number of people in attendance on each date, amount of receipts and prizes on each day? (These records must be retained for three years.) c. A record of the name and address of each individual to whom a door prize, regular or special Bingo game prize or jackpot from the playing of Bingo is awarded? d. A complete and itemized record of all receipts and disburse- ments which support, and that agree with, the quarterly and annual reports required to be filed, and that these records must be maintained in reasonable order to permit audit? 22. Does your organization understand that instant Bingo may only be conducted at such time as regular Bingo game is in progress, and only at such locations and at such times as are specified in this application? 23. Does your organization understand that the gross receipts in the course of a reporting year from the playing of instant Bingo may not exceed 33 1/3$ o.f the gross receipts of an organization's Bingo operation? 24. Does your organization understand it may not sell an instant Bingo card to an individual below sixteen years of age? 25. Does your organization understand that an organization whose gross receipts from all bingo operations .that exceed or are ex- pected to exceed X75,000 in any calendar year shall have been granted tax-exempt status pursuant to Section 501 C of the United States Internal Revenue Service? (Certificate must be attached.) is played, and the 7 26. Does your organization understand that a Certificate of_ Occu- pancy must be obtained or be on file which authorizes this use at the proposed location? 27. Does your organization understand that awards or prize money or merchandise valued in excess of the following amounts are illegal? a. No door prize shall exceed twenty-five dollars. b. No regular Bingo or special Bingo game shal]_ exceed One Hund- red dollars. c. No jackpot of any nature whatsoever shall exceed One Thousand Dollars, nor shalt the total amount of jackpot prizes awarded in any one calendar day exceed One Thousand Dollars. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * NOTARIZATION: THE FOLLOWING OATH MUST BE TAKEN BY ALL APPLICANTS I hereby swear or affirm under the penalties of perjury as set forth in X18.2 of_ the Code of Virginia, that all of the above statements are true to the best of my knowledge, information, and beliefs. All questions have been answered. Signed by: ame Administrator c/o P. 0. Box 538, Sal era Home Address 24153 Title Subscribed and sworn before me, this My commission expires: ~(~ 1 / -~3~ 19 ~! ~ ~, RETURiv THIS COMPLETED APPLICATION TO: day o f_19 G~ Notary Public COMMISSIONER OF THE REVENUE P.O. Box ?.0409 Roanoke, VA 24018-0513 8 NOT VALID UNLESS COUNTERSIGNED The above application, having been found in due form, is approved and issued to the applicant to have e.Efect until December 31st of this calendar year. G t _ C~ ~ -~,,' Date Commi s.ioner o the Re enue The above application is not approved. Date Commissioner of the revenue 9 k' ACTION NO. A-121890-4.e ITEM NUMBER ~ ~' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: December 18, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: Acceptance of additions to, discontinuances, abandonments, and renumbering from the Secondary System by the Virginia Department of Transportation COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Roanoke County has received acknowledgement that the following roads have been accepted, discontinued, abandoned and renumbered for the Secondary System by the Virginia Department of Transportation effective November 17, 1990. ADDITIONS' 0.23.mile of Route 689 - Sections 7, 8, 9, 10, and 11 0.10 mile of Route 690 - Sections 12 and 13 0.14 mile of Route 692 - Section 3 and 4 of new location DISCONTINUANCE: 0.14 mile of Route 689 - Section 14 of old location 0.10 mile of Route 692 - Section 1 and 2 of old location ABANDONMENT' 0.21 mile of Route 689 - Sections 1, 2, 3, and 5 of old location 0.09 mile of Route 690 - Section 6 of old location RENUMBERING' 0.11 mile of Route 690 - Section 4 of old location Route 689 SUBMITTED BY: /9~ Mary H. Allen Clerk to the Board APPROVED BY: Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator w ,,... R ~- Cp ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved (x) Motion by: Bob r,. Tohnson _ No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Robers x Received ( ) Eddy x Referred ( ) Johnson x To ( ) McGraw x Nickens x cc: File Phillip Henry, Director, Engineering S C9a ~Bgylq ~, ~~ J~~IpL0. T'~" RAY D. PETHTEL COMMISSIONER DEPARTMENT OFTRANSPORTATION 1401 EAST BROAD STREET RICHMOND, 23219 November 28, 1990 ~~ ~ ~ Secondary System Additions, Discontinuance and Abandonments Roanoke County Project: 0689-080-192, M502 Board of Supervisors County of Roanoke P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 MEMBERS OF THE BOARD: As requested in your resolution dated July 24, 1990, the following additions to and discontinuance and abandonments from the Secondary System of Roanoke County are hereby approved, effective November 27, 1990. The- discontinuance was approved by the Commonwealth Transportation Board at their meeting on November 19, 1990. ADDITIONS Route 689 - Sections 7, 8, 9, 10 and 11 of new location Route 690 - Sections 12 and 13 of new location DISCONTINUANCE Route 689 - Section 14 of old location ABANDONMENTS Route 689 - Sections 1, 2, 3 and 5 of old location Route 690 - Section 6 of old location RENUMBERING Route 690 - Section 4 of old location Route 689 Sincerely, ay D. ethte o missioner TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21ST CENTURY LENGTH 0.23 Mi 0.10 Mi 0.14 Mi 0.21 Mi 0.09 Mi 0.11 Mi DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 7407 EAST BROAD STREET RAY D. PETHTEL RICHMOND, 23279 COMMISSIONER November 2 8 , 19 9 0 Secondary System Additions and Discontinuances Roanoke County Project: 0692-080-199, M502 Board of Supervisors County of Roanoke P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 MEMBERS OF THE BOARD: As requested in your resolution dated July 24, 1990, the following additions to and discontinuances from the Secondary System of Roanoke County are hereby approved, effective November 27, 1990. The discontinuances were approved by the Commonwealth Transportation Board at their meeting on November 19, 1990. ADDITIONS Route 692 - Sections 3 and 4 of new location DISCONTINUANCES Route 692 - Sections 1 and 2 of old location Sincerely, .L/. R D. Pethtel Commissioner LENGTH 0.14 Mi 0.10 Mi TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21ST CENTURY ACTION NO. A-121890-4.f ITEM NUMBER I~'- "/ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: December 18, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: Acceptance of Fairway Estates Drive, Viking Drive, Norseman Drive, Chippenham Drive, Shrewsbury Court, Brentwood Court, Kingsmill Drive and Mill Pond Drive into the Secondary System by the Virginia Department of Transportation COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Roanoke County has received acknowledgement that the following roads have been accepted into the Secondary System by the Virginia Department of Transportation effective November 30, 1990. 1. 0.24 mile of Fairway Estates Drive (Route 1388) 2. 0.11 mile of Viking Drive (Route 1561) 3. 0.12 mile of Norseman Drive (Route 1600) 4. 0.14 mile of Chippenham Drive (Route 1980) 5. 0.05 mile of Shrewsbury Court (Route 1982) 6. 0.18 mile of Brentwood Court (Route 1983) 7. 0.12 mile of Kingsmill Drive (Route 1166) 8. 0.10 mile of Mill Pond Drive (Route 1169) SUBMITTED BY: Mary H. Allen Clerk to the Board APPROVED BY: C~ Y`~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator -------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved (X) Motion by: Rnh T T~hnson No Yes Abs Robers x Denied ( ) Eddy x Received ( ) x Referred ( ) Johnson x To ( ) McGraw Nickens x cc: File Phillip Henry, Director, Engineering ~Q Ta 6(.y®~ \ ~I e is - a~~ , DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1401 EAST BROAD STREET RAY D. PETHTEL RICHMOND, 23219 COMMISSIONER December 3, 1990 Secondary System Additions Roanoke County Board of Supervisors County of Roanoke P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 MEMBERS OF THE BOARD: As requested in your resolutions dated October 9, 1990, the following additions to the Secondary System of Roanoke County are hereby approved, effective November 30, 1990. ADDITIONS LENGTH FAIRWAY FOREST ESTATES - SECTION 1 Route 1388 (Fairway Estates Drive) - From Route 1381 to 0.24 mile Southeast Route 1381 0.24 Mi VIKING COURT Route 1561 (Viking Drive) - From Route 1557 to 0.11 mile North Route 1557 0.11 Mi Route 1600 (Norseman Drive) - From Route 1561 to 0.12 mile West Route 1561 0.12 Mi KINGSTON COURT - SECTIONS 2 & 3 Route 1980 (Chippenham Drive) - From Route 1981 to Route 1983 0.14 Mi Route 1982 (Shrewsbury Court) - From Route 1980 to 0.05 mile West Route 1980 0.05 Mi Route 1983 (Brentwood Court) - From 0.05 mile West Route 1980 to 0.13 mile East Route 1980 0.18 Mi Sincerely, y Petht~l missioner TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21ST CENTURY z _ d~ ~syy®.g ~~p¢a ~~ DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1401 EAST BROAD STREET RAY D. PETHTEL RICHMOND, 23219 COMMISSIONER December 5, 1990 Secondary System Additions Roanoke County Board of Supervisors County of Roanoke P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 MEMBERS OF THE BOARD: As requested in your resolution dated October 23, 1990, the following additions to the Secondary System of Roanoke County are hereby approved, effective December 5, 1990. ADDITIONS WOODBRIDGE - SECTION 11 Route 1166 (Kingsmill Drive) - From Route 1167 to 0.12 mile West Route 1167 Route 1169 (Mill Pond Drive) - From Route 1167 to 0.10 mile West Route 1167 Sincerely, R D. Peth 1 C missioner LENGTH 0.12 Mi 0.10 Mi TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21ST CENTURY ACTION # A-121890-4.g ITEM NUMBER j~- Cg AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: December 18, 1990 SUBJECT: Acceptance of Water and Sanitary Sewer Facilities Serving Buck Run Apartments (formerly Woods Crossing) COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Developers of Buck Run Apartments (formerly Woods Crossing), Loeb Construction Company, have requested that Roanoke County accept the Deed conveying the water and sanitary sewer facilities serving the subdivision along with all necessary easements. The water and sewer facilities are installed, as shown on plans prepared by Lumsden & Associates entitled Buck Run Apartments, dated June 26, 1986, which are on file in the County Engineering Department. The water and sanitary sewer facility construction meets the specifications and the plans approved by the County. FISCAL IMPACT' The value of the water and sanitary sewer construction is $13,000.00 and $15,00.00 respectively. RECOMMENDATION' Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors accept the water and sanitary sewer facilities serving Buck Run Apartments (formerly Woods Crossing) along with all necessary easements, and authorize the County Administrator to execute a Deed for the transfer of these facilities. SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED: f~ Y ~ ` C~ Cliffor r ig, P.E. Elmer C. Hodge Utility Director County Administrator Approved (x) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to ACTION Motion by: Bob L. Johnson VOTE No Eddy Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers cc: File Clifford Craig, Director, Utilities Phillip Henry, Director, Engineering Yes Abs x x x x x ~'~' ~t AT THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, DECEMBER 18, 1990 RESOLUTION 121890-4.h REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF HENRY FARMS ROAD INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That this matter came this day to be heard upon the proceedings herein, and upon the application of Henry Farms Road, from the intersection of Corntassel Lane to the cul-de-sac, for a distance of 0.11 miles to be accepted and made a part of the Secondary System of State Highways under Section 33.1-229 of the Virginia State Code. 2. That it appears to the Board that drainage easements and a fifty (50) foot right-of-way for said road have heretofore been dedicated by virtue of a certain map\maps known as Henry Acres Subdivision which map was recorded in Plat Book 11, Page 171, of the records of the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, on June 12, 1989 and that by reason of the recordation of said map no report from a Board of Viewers, nor consent or donation of right-of-way from the abutting property owners is necessary. The Board hereby guarantees said right-of- way for drainage. 3. That said road known as Henry Farms Road and which is shown on a certain sketch accompanying this Resolution, be, and the same are hereby established as a public road to become a part of the State Secondary System of Highways in Roanoke County, only from and after notification of official acceptance of said street or highway by the Virginia Department of Transportation. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: i' ~ C c%~-c~ ~9~ _ LJ Mary H. A len, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Phillip Henry, Director, Engineering Arnold Covey, Director, Development & Inspections, and copy for Virginia Department of Transportation ITEM NUMBER ~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: December 18, 1990 SUBJECT: Acceptance of Henry Farms Road into the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Walter L. Henry & Virginia B. Henry the developer of Henry Acres Subdivision, requests that the Board of Supervisors approve a resolution to the Virginia Department of Transportation requesting that they accept 0.11 miles of Henry Farms Road from the intersection of Corntassel Lane to the cul-de-sac. The staff has inspected this road along with representatives of the Virginia Department of Transportation and find the road is acceptable. FISCAL IMPACT• No county funding is required. RECOMMENDATIONS: The staff recommends that the Board approve a resolution to the Virginia Department of Transportation requesting that they accept Henry Farms Road into the Secondary Road System. ~' 9 SUBMITTED BY: ~~ . Phillip T. Henry, E, Director of Engineering APPROVED: C Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by• No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Eddy Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers 2 • ~ ~ •IGOC "~ s Pt,Y ((V9 f 1 ~ 1 . Keg HEKrHT$ .~ •~rouw .Loo n4~. ~~s ~ .._~ yp MI~~ 0AG5 j VICINITY MAF"z' k-9 ~:!- NORTR ~~ ~~~. _ i93 i 4 1: ... i ~ i9 7 ~ ~~ / ~ QGC \~ 12 ~ J i i6 i .. _, 928~c~ \ ~~ ~ _ / ~7 t-, I Z ..S At ~ a it ~ ~~„ n, ~ 1 c~n`S '`1' ~~ ~b5• , i94`r• t9 6 J .;,; 2,2 9! .• 9 np • . `C ~-"~ :.~• X92 S c9 4c l ~~~~ ~ 3 ~~` ~ 3- ,`~~ 4 t ~ 6a Dc o c ~ / ~ e6.. \ r'41:;~ '" _ f\,• N~ ~ ~ - ~ i _. _. ___ ...~ .. _1._.._ .._ C _-___~_ !? y / \ i PROPOSED ADDITION SHOWN IN GRAY DESCRIPTION: I) HENRY FARMS ROAD FROM THE INTERSECTION OF CORNTASSEL LANE (ROUTE 923) TO THE CUL-DE-SAC. LENGTH: (1) 0.11 MILES RIGHT OF WAY: (7) 50 FEET ROADWAY WIDTH: (:]) 30 FEET SURFACE WIDTH: (1) ZO:FEET_ j SERVICE (1) 3 HOMES i r ~ ACCEPTANCE OF HENRY FARMS ROAD INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY SYSTEM BNGINBI3RING 3 PS.D¢ l-~'- ~ AT THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, DECEMBER 18, 1990 RESOLUTION REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF HENRY FARMS ROAD INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That this matter came this day to be heard upon the proceedings herein, and upon the application of Henry Farms Road, from the intersection of Corntassel Lane to the cul-de-sac, for a distance of 0.11 miles to be accepted and made a part of the Secondary System of State Highways under Section 33.1-229 of the Virginia State Code. 2. That it appears to the Board that drainage easements and a fifty (50) foot right-of-way for said road have heretofore been dedicated by virtue of a certain map\maps known as Henry Acres Subdivision which map was recorded in Plat Book 11, Page 171, of the records of the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, on June 12, 1989 and that by reason of the recordation of said map no report from a Board of Viewers, nor consent or donation of right-of-way from the abutting property owners is necessary. The Board hereby guarantees said right-of-way for drainage. 4 ~l-~ 3. That said road known as Henry Farms Road and which is shown on a certain sketch accompanying this Resolution, be, and the same are hereby established as a public road to become a part of the State Secondary System of Highways in Roanoke County, only from and after notification of official acceptance of said street or highway by the Virginia Department of Transportation. 5 ./ r ~ a~ ~~ AT THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, DECEMBER 18, 1990 RESOLUTION 121890-4.i REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF HOLLINS COURT DRIVE INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That this matter came this day to be heard upon the proceedings herein, and upon the application of Hollins Court Drive from the intersection of Williamson Road (Route 11) to the cul- de-sac for a distance of 0.37 .miles to be accepted and made a part of the Secondary System of State Highways under Section 33.1-229 of the Virginia State Code. 2. That it appears to the Board that drainage easements and a fifty (50) foot right-of-way for said road have heretofore been dedicated by virtue of a certain map\maps known as Hollins Court Subdivision which map was recorded in Plat Book 11, Page 147, of the records of the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, on May 23, 1989 and that by reason of the recordation of said map no report from a Board of Viewers, nor consent or donation of right-of-way from the abutting property owners is necessary. The Board hereby guarantees said right-of- way for drainage. 3. That said road known as Hollins Court Drive and which is shown on a certain sketch accompanying this Resolution, be, and the same is hereby established as a public road to become a part of the State Secondary System of Highways in Roanoke County, only from and i ~ after notification of official acceptance of said street or highway by the Virginia Department of Transportation. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: '~ a~-~-~ mod. Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Phillip Henry, Director, Engineering Arnold Covey, Director, Development & Inspections, and copy for Virginia Department of Transportation ITEM NUMBER ~' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: December 18, 1990 SUBJECT: Acceptance of Hollins Court Drive into the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Boone, Boone, and Loeb, Inc. the developer of Hollins Court, requests that the Board of Supervisors approve a resolution to the Virginia Department of Transportation requesting that they accept 0.37 miles of Hollins Court Drive. The staff has inspected this road along with representatives of the Virginia Department of Transportation and find the road is acceptable. FISCAL IMPACT• No county funding is required. RECOMMENDATIONS- The staff recommends that the Board approve a resolution to the Virginia Department of Transportation requesting that they accept Hollins Court Drive into the Secondary Road System. SUBMITTED BY: ~~~ ~ Phillip T. Henry, P. E. Director of Engineering APPROVED: ~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator /~,'' / b Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by: ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs Eddy Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers /~ NORTH ~~ ~~ ~ s PROPOSED ADDITION SHOWN IN GRAY'., ~ ~' ~ µ4• ~ ~~, DESCRIPTION / ,.. ~ ~ ~ / ~~~P - 1) . Hollins Court Drive from ~\ ` . .,• the intersection of Williamson 4n „az ~ ~!f - x + Road (Route 11) to the cul - 9 '~=•'' ~ ~~.~ ' = de-sac. ,~ x ' ~' ,e:~ •a e ~ ~' LENGTH: 0.18 miles \ ,~N ~, :: 3 •' ,a?• ~ RIGHT-OF-WAY: 50 to 70 feet ~ w • ~ "" .... ,~+ ,~ r ~ ROADWAY WIDTH: 32 to 36 feet ~9o • ~ ~ ~~ J •a SURFACE WIDTH: 36 to 40 feet 4 • ti ~2 ,,~° 1 ~ •-°,~ t , SERVICE: 4 homes _ '• f9°' 11 LENGTH: 0.19 miles .. .~•~ s ' ~ -s~' ~• RIGHT-OF-WAY: 50 feet 4~ +~y° ,~ ,,~~ = g°.~ • ,~ "~ ROADWAY WIDTH: 26 feet ~ • '~ ' SURFACE WIDTH : 30 feet •~ , ~ ~'~' ~ ~ • ' " ~ •~'~~ SERVICE : 4 homes ill 40 ,,~ ~ 13 '° ' ' ~ ` s 39 s. • a ..,, •.,-, g . ,~, ' ~ ~ ~ 3! ~ '~ ,. 36 ., ~, •nO" •-~• Nit .. ~ • . • . . ~ .~ ` - ` . 35 ~ ~^_~.,~w~l~rs cow, CNCI~ n 3a ' ~a ,~,. . u •~~ ~ ~ ~~ •~ ;. r0 K .. ~ .... ~ • ..~ n ' 19 ~ . Y~ ~ i ' ' ' ~ . ,~.~2 ~... ... 20 ~ ..., -• r , .n . ,, ~ ~. ~~ ,~~~, Acceptance of Hollins Court Drive into the Virginia ENGINEERING Department of Transportation Secondary System 3 • 97 ~~ i-~ ~ a AT THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, DECEMBER 18, 1990 RESOLUTION REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF HOLLINS COURT DRIVE INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That this matter came this day to be heard upon the proceedings herein, and upon the application of Hollins Court Drive from the intersection of Williamson Road (Route 11} to the cul-de-sac for a distance of 0.37 miles to be accepted and made a part of the Secondary System of State Highways under Section 33.1-229 of the Virginia State Code. 2. That it appears to the Board that drainage easements and a fifty (50) foot right-of-way for said road have heretofore been dedicated by virtue of a certain map\maps known as Hollins Court Subdivision which map was recorded in Plat Book 11, Page 147, of the records of the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, on May 23, 1989 and that by reason of the recordation of said map no report from a Board of Viewers, nor consent or donation of right-of-way from the abutting property owners is necessary. The Board hereby guarantees said right-of-way for drainage. 4 /~ - / ~ 3. That said road known as Hollins Court Drive and which is shown on a certain sketch accompanying this Resolution, be, and the same is hereby established as a public road to become a part of the State Secondary System of Highways in Roanoke County, only from and after notification of official acceptance of said street or highway by the Virginia Department of Transportation. 5 r ~,i AT THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, DECEMBER 18, 1990 RESOLUTION 121890-4.i REQUESTING CHANGE8 IN SECONDARY SYSTEM DUE TO RELOCATION AND RECONSTRUCTION OF BRADSHAW ROAD (ROUTE 622) BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That this matter came this day to be heard upon the proceedings herein, and upon the application of a portion of Bradshaw Road (Route 622) which was relocated and reconstructed under VDOT Project 0622-080-131,C501; 2. That it appears to the Board of Supervisors that portions of Secondary Route 622, from 0.45 miles east of the intersection of Green Acre Drive (Route 873) to 0.53 miles east of the intersection of Route 873, a distance of 0.08 miles, has been altered; a new road has been constructed and approved by the State Transportation Commissioner which new road serves the same citizens as the road altered; and these changes are shown on the attached sketch titled "CHANGES IN SECONDARY SYSTEM DUE TO RELOCATION AND RECONSTRUCTION ON ROUTE 622, PROJECT 0622-080-131,C501, DATED AT RICHMOND, VIRGINIA, ON NOVEMBER 1, 1990"; 3. That the section of old location, of Route 622, i.e., Section #1 for a total distance of 0.08 miles, is hereby abandoned as a public road, pursuant to Section 33.1-155 of the Code of Virginia, as amended. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: /~ Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Phillip Henry, Director, Engineering Arnold Covey, Director, Development & Inspections, and copy for Virginia Department of Transportation _+ ~ , ITEM NUMBER ~1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: December 18, 1990 SUBJECT: Requesting Changes in Secondary System Due to Relocation and Reconstruction of Bradshaw Road (Route 622) COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR`S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Bradshaw Road (Route 622) was reconstructed to eliminate a substandard horizontal alignment approximately 20 years ago. The reconstructed road has previously been taken into the Secondary System and at this time VDOT wishes to abandon the old road section. FISCAL IMPACT- No county funds were Secondary System. involved in this change in the RECOMMENDATIONS• Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors approve the attached resolution to implement changes in the Secondary System due to reconstruction of Bradshaw Road (Route 622). ,~-- // SUBMITTED BY: Phillip T. Henry, P. Director of Engineering APPROVED: Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator --------------------------------------------------------------- ACTiON VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Eddy Received ( ) Johnson Referred McGraw to Nickens Robers 2 f i --- i/. NORTB LEGEND --- Section of new location to be added Section of old locot~on to be discontinued To Rt~ 311 (14.00 ) CHANGES IN SECONDARY SYSTEM DUE TO RELOCATION BNGINBBRING AND RECONSTRUCTION OF BRADSHAW ROAD (ROUTE 622), VDOT PROJECT 0622-080-131,C501 3 // AT THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE HOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, DECEMBER 18, 1990 RESOLUTION REQUESTING CHANGES IN SECONDARY SYSTEM DUE TO RELOCATION AND RECONSTRUCTION OF BRADSHAW ROAD (ROUTE 622) BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That this matter came this day to be heard upon the proceedings herein, and upon the application of a portion of Bradshaw Road (Route 622) which was relocated and reconstructed under VDOT Project 0622-080-131,C501; 2. That it appears to the Board of Supervisors that portions of Secondary Route 622, from 0.45 miles east of the intersection of Green Acre Drive (Route 873) to 0.53 miles east of the intersection of Route 873, a distance of 0.08 miles, has been altered; a new road has been constructed and approved by the State Transportation Commissioner which new road serves the same citizens as the road altered; and these changes are shown on the attached sketch titled "CHANGES IN SECONDARY SYSTEM DUE TO RELOCATION AND RECONSTRUCTION ON ROUTE 622, PROJECT 0622-080- 131,0501, DATED AT RICHMOND, VIRGINIA, ON NOVEMBER 1, 1990"; 3. That the section of old location, of Route 622, i.e., Section #1 for a total distance of 0.08 miles, is hereby abandoned as a public road, pursuant to Section 33.1-155 of the Code of Virginia, as amended. 4 I '°4. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, DECEMBER 18, 1990 RESOLUTION 121890-4.k OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF ROANORE, VIRGINIA WITH RESPECT TO ROANORE COUNTY RESOURCE AUTHORITY LANDFILL FINANCING The Board of Supervisors ("Board") of the County of Roanoke, Virginia ("County") created the Roanoke County Resource Authority ("Authority") by resolution adopted June 14, 1989. The Authority was created, among other things, to provide for the development and operation of a sanitary landfill to serve the County and such other entities as the Authority may determine ("Project"). The Authority intends to finance the acquisition, construction, development and equipping of the Project by the issuance of its revenue bonds ("Bonds") and notes in anticipation thereof ("Notes"). The Board has determined that it is in the best interest of the County to assist the Authority in the acquisition, construction, development and equipping of the Project and the financing thereof. The Board adopted a resolution on November 15, 1989 agreeing to assist the Authority in such financing and desires to reaffirm such resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA: 1. Assistance to Authority. The Board agrees to assist the Authority in financing the Project. It is anticipated that the Authority will finance the Project by the issuance and sale of its Notes in the principal amount not to exceed $2 million in anticipation of the issuance and sale of the Authority's Bonds. The Board agrees that in the event that the Bonds are not issued, the Board will take such steps as may be necessary to pay to the Authority the amount necessary to pay principal of and interest on the Notes at maturity. The Board, while recognizing that it is not empowered to make any binding commitment beyond the current fiscal year, states that it is its current intention to make sufficient appropriations to pay such moneys to the Authority in the event that the Bonds are not issued by the Authority. Nothing in this Resolution or the Notes shall constitute a pledge of the full faith and credit of the County beyond the constitutionally permitted annual appropriations. 2. Further Actions. The County Administrator and such officers and agents of the County as he may designate are each authorized and directed to prepare, execute, and deliver and and all papers, instruments, opinions, certificates and other documents and to take such action as they deem appropriate to carry out the purposes of this Resolution and any such action previously taken is hereby ratified and confirmed. 3. Effective Date. This Resolution shall take effect immediately. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt resolution and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None ABSENT: None A COPY TESTE: ~~~~ /`Y` Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance Paul Mahoney, County Attorney John Hubbard, Assistant County Attorney Roanoke County Resource Authority Files The undersigned Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia certifies that the foregoing resolution was duly adopted at a meeting of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia duly called and held on December 18, 1990 and has not been repealed or amehded and remains in full force and effect. Date: December ~, 1990 1"J 'Clerk, Board of Supervisors of l the County of Roanoke, Virginia ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER ~"~ ~ •~•• AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: December 18, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: Approval of Resolution with Respect to Roanoke County Resource Authority Landfill Financing • . COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR' S COMMENTS : I~~v~G~..c~~ ~~ BACKGROUND' On November 15, 1989, the Board of Supervisors adopted a Resolution to assist the Roanoke County Resource Authority in the acquisition, construction, development and equipping of the Landfill project and related financing. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: At the Roanoke County Resource Authority meeting which will be held following the Board of Supervisors meeting today, the Authority will be renewing $2,000,000 in Bond Anticipation Notes with Central Fidelity Bank. As part of the closing papers, Central Fidelity has requested that the Board of Supervisors adopt the attached resolution which reaffirms the Boards' intent expressed in the November 15, 1989 Resolution. In this Resolution, the Board agrees that in the event the Landfill bonds are not issued, the Board will take such steps as may be necessary to pay the Authority the amount needed to pay principal and interest on the notes at maturity. FISCAL IMPACT' The $2,000,000 Bond Anticipation Notes will be repaid with the Landfill Bonds when they are issued in December of 1991. In the event that these bonds are not issued, Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will need to pay the principal and the interest on these notes at maturity. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends adopting the attached Resolution which reaffirms the intention of the Board to support the $2,000,000 Bond Anticipation Notes that are being sold by the Roanoke County Resource Authority. Respectfully submitted, ~~i~ ~. Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance Approved by, Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator -------- ------------------------ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs Approved Denied Received Referred To Motion by: Eddy Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, DECEMBER 18, 1990 TO RESOLUTION OF THE COUNTY ROANOKE COUNTY OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA WITH RESPECT RESOURCE AUTHORITY LANDFILL FINANCING The Board of Supervisors ("Board") of the County of Roanoke, Virginia ("County") created the Roanoke County Resource Authority ("Authority") by resolution adopted June 14, 1989. The Authority was created, among other things, to provide for the development and operation of a sanitary landfill to serve the County and such other entities as the Authority may determine ("Project"). The Authority intends to finance the acquisition, construction, development and equipping of the Project by the issuance of its revenue bonds ("Bonds") and notes in anticipation thereof ("Notes"). The Board has determined that it is in the best interest of the County to assist the Authority in the acquisition, construction, development and equipping of the Project and the financing thereof. The Board adopted a resolution on November 15, 1989 agreeing to assist the Authority in such financing and desires to reaffirm such resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA: 1. Assistance to Authority. The Board agrees to assist the Authority in financing the Project. It is anticipated that the Authority will finance the Project by the issuance and sale of its Notes in the principal amount not to exceed $2 million in anticipation of the issuance and sale of the Authority's Bonds. The Board agrees that in the event that the Bonds are not issued, the Board will take such steps as may be necessary to pay to the Authority the amount necessary to pay principal of and interest on the Notes at maturity. The Board, while recognizing that it is not empowered to make any binding commitment beyond the current fiscal year, states that it is its current intention to make sufficient appropriations to pay such moneys to the Authority in the event that the Bonds are not issued by the Authority. Nothing in this Resolution or the Notes shall constitute a pledge of the full faith and credit of the County beyond the constitutionally permitted annual appropriations. 2. Further Actions. The County Administrator and such officers and agents of the County as he may designate are each authorized and directed to prepare, execute, and deliver all papers, instruments, opinions, certificates and other documents and to take such action as they deem appropriate to carry out the purposes of this Resolution and any such action previously taken is hereby ratified and confirmed. `~ 3. Effective Date. immediately. On motion of Supervisor Supervisor recorded vote: AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: This Resolution shall take effect seconded by and carried by the following A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors The undersigned Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia certifies that the foregoing resolution was duly adopted at a meeting of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia duly called and held on December 18, 1990 and has not been repealed or amended and remains in full force and effect. Date: December , 1990 Clerk, Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia t .~ ACTION NO. A-121890-4.1 ITEM NUMBER _~- ~.,~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: December 18, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: Request for approval of a 50/50 Raffle Permit for Women of the Moose Chapter 1022 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Women of the Moose Chapter 1022 has requested to hold 50/50 raffles thoughout 1991. The list of specific dates is attached. The application has been reviewed with the Commissioner of Revenue and he recommends that it be approved. The application is on file in the Clerk's Office. The organization has paid the $25.00 fee. STAFF RECOMMENDATION• It is recommended that the application for a 50/50 Raffle Permit be approved. • SUBMITTED BY: ~~ Mary H. llen Clerk to the Board APPROVED BY: ~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ---------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved (x) Motion by: Bob L. Johnson Denied ( ) No Yes Abs Eddy x Received ( ) Johnson x Referred ( ) McGraw x To ( ) Nickens x Robers x cc: File Bingo/Raffle File i~'- ~, Dates for raffle (50/50 ) Jan 8, 19, 22 Feb 5, 9, 19, Mar 5, 19 April 2, 16 May 7, 21 June 4, 18 July 2, 16 Aug 6, 20 Sept 3, 17 Oct 1, 15 Hov 2, 5, 19 Dec 3, 17, 31 n COUNTY OF ROANCKE, ~IP,GINIA COMMISSIONER O~ `S'HE ~ ~VENJI: APPLICATION FGR PERMIT TO _CCNDUCT RAFFLES OR BINGO /~ /~ Application is hereby made for a bingo game or raffle permit. This application is made subject to a?1 County and State laws, ordinances, rule s and regulation, now in force, or that may be enacted hereafter and which are hel-eby agreed to by the under- signed applicant and which shall be deemed a condition under which this permit is issued. All applicants should exercise extr~~~e care to ensure the accura- cy of their responses to the fo11o..' •~g questions. Bingo games and raffles are strictly regulated ~y ~'irte x.3.2-340.1 et. seq. of the criminal statutes of the ~,'irc~ir,ia Cede, and by Section 4-86 et. seq, of `he Roanoke .^-~:unty Code. These laws authorize the County Board of Supervisors ~~ conduct ~ reasonable investiga- tion prior to granting a binG~ or raffle permit. The Board has sixty days from the filing of an application to ~3rant or deny the permit. The Board may deny, suspend, ~~r zavokE~ the permit of any organization found pct to be in strict compliance with county and state law. Any person violating county or stata reyulatic~.s c:,ncerninq theses permits shall be guilty of a Class ? misdE~meanor. Any person who uses any part of the gross receipts from F~ingo or raffles for any purpose other than the lawful rE:' i~.-~ nos, charitable, community, or educational purposes for which the organization is specifi- cally organized, except for reasonab~~+ operating expenses, shall be guilty of a Class 6 felony. THIS APPLICATION I;; FOR: ( chec:+: ~~ne 1 RAFFLE PER I)TS ~ ,.-''~~ BINGO GAMES r Name o f O r g a n i z a t i c;~ t i ~~ /~- ~ ~~ ;Z~==~~~~d~- ~ ~~ .L~, ~~1~~ ~ _ ~~~ Street Address `.~`. /~e < f ~~ ~,' ~,% ` .-a ~ ~~ ale- `~' Mailing Address ~~ ~~ ~ ~t~~ ~,~ _ ~ ~ ~ .--~%~ „ ` City, State, Zip Code ~~~ yz_ti,~__.., ~/r ~- 2~~ ~ ~ ~~~c T' Purpose and Type of~ Organization When was the organization foun~~c-+? _.__.. J.x.M.~~RVtw!n~ama!e~.r'•c~'~Il~~txP~r~.. .. ~ ,~3 Roanoke County meeting place?--%' .~.~',t. l,E~~;~~`;~-~~i,,~(~r_, ~~~c~~ ~~ ~=~ ~~ ~, -- Has organization been in exista~r~ce in JRoan~ke County for two con- tinuous years? YF~ ,~/ NC Is the organization non-profit? Indicate Federal Identification Number- # Attach copy of IRS Tax Exemption le~.ter. Officers of the Organization: ,~ >zc~~~~~~., ~l i =~~t1~~6~ ~e /U` s ~/ c E'` nt ~ _ - , _ ,. ~1-ent ~_~~~ ~ ~ ~~,`C ~ -~ Address : `/ ~0/~ ~rL~~- ,~(~; r. YJ ~~% Fed-' ~-:- s~> : ~~~ ~. _ -~ ~" ~1~~_c_ Treasurer :~ ~' Address : `~ -' ~- f / .. G.r-~~~4zc.cJ- r, ~~"~ L':I.LI~~- L'c'c ~ ~Lr ~ it Member authorized to be responsible for Raffle or Bingo opera- tions: Name Home Address Phone Bus. Phone A COMPLETE LIST C?1` THE NAMED ~;:dD ADDRES:3ES OP CURRENT MEMBER- SHIP MUST BE FURNISriED WITH THIS AFPLICT,'LrT7N. Specific location ~~::ac~re Raffle or Bingo Game is to be conducted. RAFFLES: Date of Drawing __ Time of Drawing BINGO: Days of Week & Hours of Ac.:i.'..'. t,.y; Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday From To From _ __ _ To ~ J ~~ From _ ,~c, - .__ From To ~ ~~ From_ _ _ , To ~ From _ ~ To _ From _.__ ~ _ To YES ~ NO ,~ ~. ~~~~ State specifically how the pr•~~.~eds from the -fie/Raffle will be used. List in detail the planned or in'_?nded use of the proceeds. Use estimates amounts if necessary. _ cr-..~_ ~ ~; ti~-~~~. 1, :7« '~~ y J i ~~~~_ ' J %: _ . ,~/ ~~ I ~ ~-l •-may r E ~ c.~! C`~12~-7L. ~~. ~ ~~ c. L- ~~-~-- ~_ / ----~- -„ / ~ „~~~. ~. ~"~- _, ~ y; r t/// ' '~_-. ~~,~_,~ < • ~ ~T-= 3 '~ - / ,~ BINGO: Complete the following: Legal owner(s) of the building where BINGO is to be conducted: Name: Address: County State Zip Is the building owned by a 501-C non-profit organization? Seating capacity for each location: Parking spaces for each location:~_~_.,___ ALL AFFLE AND BINGO APPLICAi~'1'S MUST ANSWER QUESTIONS 1 - 19 ~_ . _ 1. Gross receipts from all sources related to the operation of Bingo games or Instant Bingo by calendar quarter for prior calen- dar year period. BINGO INSTANT BINGO 1st Quarter 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter Total ___ _ 1st Quarter 2nd Quarter Ord Quarter <ti Quarter Total 2. Does your organization understand that it is a violation of law to enter into a contract with .any person or firm, associa- tion, organization, partnership, or corporation cf any classifica- tion whatsoever, for the purpose of organizing, managing, or con- ducting Bingo Games or Raffles? ~~°< 3. Does your organization understand that it must maintain and file complete records of receipts and disbursements pertaining to Bingo games and Raffles, and that such records are subject to audit by the Commissioner of the Re~renue?~ _ z% 4. Does your organization understand that the Commissioner of the Revenue or his designee has t:he ri~;~t to go upon the premises on which any organization is conc~uc,~i;zg a Bingo game or raffle, to perform unannounced audits, and to ';~ecure for audit all re- cords required to bra maintained ~~.r Bingo gapes or raffles? vL'r _ ~T <% 4 5. Does your organization uncle?~st~.r!1 that a Financial Report must be filed with the Commissic.ner of the Revenue on or before the first day of November of_ each calendar year for which a per- mit has been issued? ,~ ~,~- 6. Does your organization understand that if gross receipts ex- ceed fifty thousand dollars during any calendar quarter, an addi- tional Financial Report must be filed for such quarter no later than sixty days following the last day of such quarter? ~,~;~- 7. Does your organization understand that the failure to file financial reports when due shall cause automatic revocation of the permit, and no such organizatiun shall conduct any Bingo game or raffle thereafter until such report is properly filed and a new permit is obtained? ~, <, 8. Does your organization understand that each Financial Report must be accompanied by a Certificate, verified under oath by the Board of Directors, that the proceeds of any Bingo game or raffle have been used for these lawfal, religious, charitable, commu- nity, or educational purposes for which the organization is spe- cifically chartered or organized, and tYiat the ~~peration of Bingo games or raffles have been in accordance with the provisions of Article 1.1 of Chapter 8, Title 18.2 of the Code of Virginia?_ 9. Does your organization understand that a one percent audit fee of the gross receipts must be paid tc the County of Roanoke upon submission of the annual f~_nancial report due on or before the first of November? ,~,~~d,., V 10. Does your organization understand that this permit is valid only in the County of Roanoke and on'y at such locations, and for such dates, as are designated in the permit application? -i•° f,, 11. Does your organization understand that no person, except a bona fide member of any such organization who shall have been a member of such organization for at least ninety days prior to such participation, shall participate in the management, opera- tion, or conduce. of any bingogame or raffle, and no person shall receive any remuneration for. participating in management, operation, or conduct of any such game or raffle? /~'~:- 12. Has your organization attached a check fo.r the annual permit fee in the amount of $25.00 payable to the County of Roanoke, Virginia?~G k:Z `~ 13. Does your organization unde.rstar:•~ that any organization found in violation of the County Bingo Sri ?af`le Ordinance or §18.2- 340.10 of the Code of Virginia autho.-i~:.ing this permit is subject to having such pez•mit revoked ~>>sd any perscr , shareholder, agent, member or employee of such or<<:~nization wY~o violates the above to having such permit revoked anc~ any person, shareholder, agent, member or employee of such organization who violates the above referenced Codes may be guilty of .a .Felony? .~ .~• 5 14. Has your organization attached3 a complete list of its member- ship to this application form?__~ ~' _~. 15. Has your organization, attached a copy of its bylaws to this application form? ~~~-~ ~~ -cLe_- 16. Has the organization been declared exempt from property taxa- tion under the Virginia Constitution or statutes? If yes, state whether exemption is for real, pers nal property, or both and identify exempt property. 17. State the specific type and purpo:~ of the organization. 19. Is the organization registF.-er with •:he Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Affairs ?ursuant to the Charitable Solicitations Act, Section 57-48 of t'~ie Virginia Code? (If so, attach copy of registration.) Has the organization been granted an ExF-mptien from registration by the Virginia Department of Agriculture ar~d Consumer Affairs? (If so, attach copy cL exemption.) ALL RAFFLE APPLICANTS DESCRIBE THE ARTICLES TO BE RAFFLED, VALUE OF SUCH ARTICLES, AND PROCEED TO NOTARIZATION. Article Description -^,~,,_f ~_~~ ,_ ~_ ~~ !: Fair l~:arket Value -_.' 6 18. Is this organization incorporated in Virginia:--~ - If yes, name and address of Registered Agent: ALL BINGO APPLICANTS MUST ANSWER f)UESTIONS 20 - 27 BEFORE NOTARIZATION RAFFLE APPLICANTS, GO TO NO7't~RIZATION. 20. Does your organization understand that the bingo games shall not be conducted more frequently than two calendar days in any calendar week? 21. Does your organization understand that it is required to keep complete records of the bingo game. These records based on §18.2- 340.6 of the Code of Virginia and §4.98 of Roanoke County Code must include the following: a. A record of the date, quantity, and card value of instant bingo supplies purchased, as well as the name and address of the supplier of such instant k~ingo supplies, and written invoice or receipt is also required "or each purchase of in- stant bingo supplies? b. A record in writing of the ~>ates on which Bingo is played, the number of people in attendance on each date, and the amount of receipts and prizes on each day? (These records must be retained for three ye~~rs.) c. A record of the name and address of each individual to whom a• door prize, regular or special Bingo game prize or jackpot from the playing of Bingo is awarded? d. A complete and itemized record of all receipts and disburse- ments which support, and that agree with, the quarterly and annual reports required to be filed, and that these records must be maintained in reasonable order to permit audit? 22. Does your organization be conducted at such time as and only at such locations this application? 23. Does your organization understand. that the gross receipts in the course of a reporting year from the playing of instant Bingo may not exceed 33 1/3$ of the gross receipts of an organization's Bingo operation? 24. Does your organization understand it may not sell an instant Bingo card to an individual below sixteen years of age? 25. Does your organization understand that an organization whose gross receipts from all bingo operations that exceed or are ex- pected to exceed $75,000 in any calendar year shall have been granted tax-exempt status pursuant to °ec.'~ion 501 C of the United States Internal Revenue Service?M (Certificate must bra attached.) understand `ha.t instant Bingo may only regular Bingo game is in progress, and .~t such times as are specified in 7 26. Does your organization unde~'s+.~u~r: 'hat a Certificate of Occu- pancy must be obtained or be on fi ~~ „`~;•~h authorizes this use at the proposed location? _!,,_ 27. Does your organization un3t,cstand that awards or prize money or merchandise valued in excess of the following amounts are illegal? a. No door prize shall exceed twenty~-flve dollars. b. No regular Bingo or special Bingo game shall exceed One Hund- red dollars. c. No jackpot of any nature whatsoever shall exceed One Thousand Dollars, nor shall the total amount of jackpot prizes awarded in any one calendar day exceed Ors Thousand Dollars. NOTARIZATION: THE FOLLOWING OATH MUST BE TAKEN BY ALL APPLICANTS I hereby swear or affirm under the penalties of perjury as set forth in §18.2 of ~:~e Code of V~rgi:~ia. that' all of the above statements are true to the best of ,ny knowledge, information, and beliefs. All questions have been answerEd. /~ Signed by• ~_ ~- ~ _ - ~ ~' / T' tle _ _ - Home A/dress ~ ' Name Subscribed and sworn before me, ~:`pis _dav of_ 19 My commission expires: 19 _ Notary Pablic RETURN THIS COMPLETED APPLICATI01~ T0: C~~MMISSIONER OF ThE REVENUE P.O. Box 2v=~!~'Q Roanoke, VN 3•'i>i~-Oa13 8 NOT VALID UNLESS Cf~-.l'r'?R.SIGNED The above application, having b~~~e~, tc>~'yt~3 in due form, is approved and issued to the applicant tc~ E.=:ve effect until December 31st of this calendar year. `~. Date Commis inner o ~e' ve e r ~ _~-- The above application is not appra~red. Date Commissioner of the Revenue 9 COIINTY OF ROANORE, VIRGINIA CAPITAL FIIND IINAPPROPRIATED BALANCE Audited Beginning Balance at July 1, 1990 $ 6,987 Balance as of December 18, 1990 Submitted by X~,C..Qrzv ~ • ~~ Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance $ 6,987 /`~/~-~ COUNTY OF ROANORE, VIRGINIA GENERAL FUND UNAPPROPRIATED BALANCE Unaudited Balance at July 1, 1990 7/1/90 Amount reimbursed by County Schools 9/25/90 Appropriation to Police Department 9/25/90 Rescinding Parks and Recreation User Fees 11/13/90 Allied Signal 11/13/90 Read Mountain Fire Station 12/4/90 VDOT Matching Funds 12/4/90 Legal Fees for Dixie Caverns 12/4/90 Expansion of CORTRAN Service of General ~ 1 ~ Amount Fund Expenditures $2,653,756 500,000 (200,000) (85,421) (875,000) (174,886) (347,500) (186,850) (5,000) Additional funds from 1989-90 operations 3,000,000 Balance as of December 18, 19901 X4,279,099 6.26% Submitted by ~~~~. ~ Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance (1) General Fund expenditures are budgeted at $68,310,395 for 1990-91. COONTY OF ROANORE~ VIRGINIA RESERVE FOR BOARD CONTINGENCY Beginning Balance at July 1, 1990 $ 50,000 August 28, 1990 Roanoke County Code Book Supplement (9,845) September 25, 1990 Contribution to TAP - Transitional Living Center (15,000) September 25, 1990 Contribution to Darrell Shell Scholarship (1,000) October 23, 1990 Replacement of lost State Revenues for the Arts (4, 250) November 13, 1990 Attorney fees for cable tv negotiations (6,800) Balance as of December 18, 1990 ~ 13,105 Submitted by Diane D. Hyat Director of Finance 1 ~:? F ~~- v a is { i ~ ~ v _ , ~+ 4 it _ •~ I __ - - -~~ ~ ~ I i I O i a z ' d o -1 D -1 f A n m C Z b a P aD IN IA W A to A W W O+ 0 i ! ~ i I 000 000 OOO OOO O O OCR O OO'~O OO O OO'O OOI O OOIOO j UV pp-~I p~G+O~U1, Lh X11 •Df A~RW W WW41 WI,tNNNNNN:N NN-'~-' WN.m WA-~oo+;-~o~-~o~ai~o-,IJafJ-~o~QO-.IrnU1.AWN-~°A WNI"'o I -i0'~OOSfA2~I3A ~~~'I,•9[~•Tt'01`~~•12~~•, a O '1 CO O'a N C;.N N y .a ,, .+m ? o m~r• m arm m w?~--%m a 7~a o i a ? ? ? .-~ a 7 n m r• a! < < 7! O m m! '1 7 ~• x .+ ri x ~ a. m 7 n' ~ 7 U y a ~ ro' ro m '1 I OI n a '1~ m ro N; .a y Ul' a O. 3 ro ro ~+ ro 0 7 r• m a, 3 a -~; N r ~yly y a m ~J<;m o•~n!7 7 mj0 F !r. am rr~m y n,7 c ~m rr•lo y', O. a m; r I ro' C C n I r* a •+ S, ro 3 ~~ n a m m ~l A N ro •+ 'f r to m ro ro aI 0 O m 7~ 1 4 ~Ci 0~~ m ro y r• a .r ! m ro ro i a ? ~ m m a w M j O. A ~ 7 ro m' m y W',, r• W, r .-+ '~ x O.'93f'~ ?m N ~•••ro ro a m d'. ro~~ •O O O. ro y O 'ry 'A I n CO 7 y O r: A ~ f ro: 7 m y ~~ 7' ~O ro N ro -1 n O T -f~ -7 -1 "i~ A 0 I C ~ ro r a I n r1 I f' 4W ~•'•~ O r. o !. c a {{ 0 0 0', ~' c r• y ~l 'o ro ro n r• -.a r• n'' v -+ ~•`y cJn':a n mlm ui~ 3 yea y .-oa ~-7 o m x,m 7 r• a ri ro a .~', -o ro': -~ y ~ i v '1 m y ~ 7 r a, m .. m I ro a j i0 n •~ a N r mI .~ y y'. C C ro',uo ~ w~ ro ~ m_ [1 f I N r• x. C 7 ; y x '~i p~ ro r (ro O< m N -~+ m 'rt a d O I a r• I m .+ 1 ~ C>, P+ ro , (A r W i D <~ -~. ro ro .a~ N m I u] ro O -1 ~ m ~~ '~ ~~ '~ y `G m ~ O O Sf'1 r• ro '7 fJ' C i m ro 'r> 3 a'. ,, C~ D y ro, G. 7 a ro; O O y' N '+1 m O x~ 0 7 i x a -I N OI a y r• r• y cam' -~ -a m ~ ro o -I 7 m x a ,, y x ~ n',an <I ro m m ro laa ~ ro ~ x aim ! m. a r• ~3 i m m~ 4',~ ~ ro 0h~,,m m. ~•' ro -h O 7 m E ro ~I m 7 r:. m O 'C ro I '~N k X71 I r C1 3 m~ ~ r O W y m a h ~ '* v a l m., ,.,. .C a ro m ~O' ~ o ~ yro I ~ W ~ W Oo N A W -~ U1 ~ W W o ~o A 411 W cw+0oawoNU1 NA oo -JUIoU1G~40D000-.I pp o+ i ool,,,..•Na~ N o0 0o Nonlloo ooo,ow II N ppgoo~j.ooc•I ~ UJ oot~oo~ oaifroo~o 0000 ~ lA AOOOgA oUt q OUIOOg0000 og000o 0o~00 ,, •r o 0 0 o w o o, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o g o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I ,. -~ G• W _ ~ I_ N A NW1 -~ o t~0 Ul II W -.o.~,~ Wo•~!N N w~AU1 A W o.a W w•~Nmc1,UtU1 UJ IO~'O-J~~)O WOl Ul fly aO ~O ~J Ul l1I UTA UI ~D OD CO-~f fi~00W ~'~O 1 o ~•.IU1UtA~JA.nN00 -J1~-`0v•+IO~oa1Aw NN T-+N W N WOON o -P oAAOA-P W -P~go~l^) W ~o Ul-.I OoN NPoOO-~AOorno I I I ~ II ~ I AA ~AGo ~ O~oANO~c~GONVj ~'~ -°t~-J •J oVi f o•.Itl1~-'u) •n-~ W o ll1N-POUI^1~OoAUiq •OW ~0~1 W ~O OO~ai W-' W AAO~G+ 1 U1dONOG+ W d~O ~D-!i -+1.~ -'mod-J ~OAA TNL1~•J O+~~ OdPDA !~ oN-.IW000~~JU1W NOb •oWA Wu^!AA--IO-J Noclt+omorN W Wo+-~ o N ^~ 00 -~ A o o~ A A N ~ W ~q In W N o -J N -J W A Uf N A O OD o -J o m ! 1 I WN UIm~ ~1-~-~ W --W N I.•~•N W NNO-+00 N~Ut-P A~ N,po~a•~auDO ~~ -~NUIm-'!oA W-J-JUtU1AA-JOUo~-J i NN-P W l/INotJt-~ITO+ py~.ON•~io~oll~-~ W TOD -~UIUII-~N CIAO W u1W G•fL~oo.P -~~ O+O!.oN~U1U1dW •J~N W~ Oo~O~t1oU1 ~ NN-J.O-+W NA^•-J •J •a-±A W-~AUt WWWWWW.LtN4-J.JW ^` W W ~IG+G~W Oo i AN i i U1 .0 WU1W-'W 111Wfl~oN ^JNC~o~NN-JUI~-~~fU~o W I I 1 1 1 1 I 1~ 1 i ~ ~ I ~ _ o~+WA.Wn N Wn) N N~ ~ W ~ N ~ A•A W ~1-JN"N o W•R~aN V) W w UlofAOP111IL,,,,111110~OO W Oo AooU100W oNq~mpDOOU1oWOD~I00 U1~IOW ~^1W Wi6~W~W •a j -Pqo-d 000lN -J 00.0ooAaNfl10~I NAiN ANO~~W o'.A'~O W ~ ~ j I. ~ I I 1 • ~ 'm ro C ~'. Z O! O ui v x 0 I ~ W 'o I ': o Im ~ '7 ro 1 ( Isla I 40 r 1 C; ' I a I m Imo', iC I m, 7 I h ! a 1 ~, 1 A 3 I ro O j 1 <!, 7 m', ~ , I C' r 1 m,^G ~i m. I I , Jl I 1 <~ -< 1 ro' -1 7: d 1 G; I I ro 1 N 1 i ' I i= 1 7 I W '1 ! 1 a ro 1 r a ' I a, r I 7' r i 1 n N 1 m' m 1 I o. ~ I 1 I m -i ~ I Cd d 1 c a 1 0: ~ 1 ~ m I m < 1 •+ O m ; 1 ! ~ C ~ 1 ~ m i m ~ 1 as ~~ ro -Il 3 N ro N 7 ! D (7 if'O O i~3~7 om~+ ',zm-G -.1 ,~ i=r.o I 3 -A I ~ ~ D ro 4 ulna Joao I"~77 X' ~ d ~D ~~~w Im C y i--a~ ,....• iW~~, o ro a w ro I o 7 I ~ I m •~ O N D D -~ G1 jmm j ! c N o ~ o -P o 1 0 I ~ ~ i ~ }. G V J tP U A ~' . _ ~ i I !000'000,0 OOj000~0 Q' ~.Ul l11 to In In 111.E A AIA A .PIA A 411 A A.W W N N A W',W N Ni-' O 111 O, 111 O 111 O O Uli U1 O!l11 O 'fA -( ~+~'9 N '0 ''$ fit Gt '.m 3 .'~', (A A ~~ 007'',C CC:ro roa'7 aro'.~N n C N ;Q ~ Q 17 ~ 7 '7 w ~• -a;7 N In 'a ~ ~.',... y ..• a AI y ~n .7 ~+ u1 ro m o ,.., a',n ... n ... o~ a ro ro ro ro'.... o ~ S C' 7 o ii .. ;.ro 7 a ro '7 ro 0 N 7 a a C ro 3 ~7 n Ut',D a ~< 7 7 -~• drr !7 y~ roUT n ~ roH a.+ n nx cai a m Ct' 7 ro ~.. ~.' a w i a '' n In s ~ a •- ~ i,o y ro o ; a ... ° xI 7 ~ •y, i7 "• III ~ a `~• ~ q~ A •y I, N O ro a Sri 47 't iw ii 7 1 I O n C O, N I I 7 3, I ~' 3, I I w I N ln' '" .. • I OD W ~ b o A A i IJI N l71 OD b~ •• .-• I b !bW-•pp~...iw O: UIW W ObN,-~ W '.A w o m b -J a b' N w~In A•,w b i ~ ~, -J '. b W o' OD W -~ ' ~ P' A ~ W NIA A 'OU-SOW-' WN '~ AO'W ba0'.Ab i lJl IA b o.c+ N -~I.,~.I ', •J o'•J b A-~ W : ~ I I I A i ~ N' (p ,WN ~o+Ufo. ~ W 'N l11 N !b o N -J A A A i tT W Oo ~ OD ~ O~ 00 I •~I A I i Ii .P ~ t11 ~I o .~ b W j UI l11 A ~.1 b i WbA N W N N A O N W l11 00 to A , W -J N! AW A-J ~'N b .P W' o m -~. o b -~ o N N N~-~ b b O+ OD UI .P ~ b NbAlF1G~Wb I mNNI A b ! A A o-+ A -J O~ O+ W lJl. W b -~ b~ to o ao b b -•~ W Ul U1 b V1 N.OG•.oU1W J U1 A W W W 1111 U7 N o oA'OO o,b T111TAAQ~:-` W oAOD •A AI.A i i In -- ~ Ai W O, -d,ll1. b, l11 ~I, 00 T v:l"-J 00 i oI ~ tT N~~1 A NI W OD o' b W A .p -~.-~ N b'. Il N O i ~ -~ QD'; A lrt l i b~ III o I ~I oo A QD, ANOODN, . i l11 W 'Jib N -• I w' i ~I N' to 00 Ai j>. b b !W m -JN A -J • m U1 ~UI o A~b Oo .. ' a+' -~ b ~ i lJl -J ~I, 111 b A' OD N I m OD -~: o C+ m~ b N I W o ~' W o+ N i ...) 1„I _. ~ b N ... O+ ~1 :.o A b'' W O bI N-J I~Al11'bN O+ lft -d I O+ -- W'. W N A'. •J ~' Oo Oo N' N m I W A:b A ~~.N A to o ~ to -- .o b 0 ! -~ Ul o N lrl 000 ~ I ~; ., , i O~O O OO ! , O 010 ~ WSW W WiW ~! N N.N ~~ A A W N i -~ i N N ~-~ , N A O O ~O ~ lJl O :O i I ' 7~ O D ~. ', a O ~•'. O '~. ~•~7 ~ -t Is ~ n 3'C ,0 3 N y ro l o', .+ 3 i9 0 !a C •* ',-e o~, £ of ~,n ...moo - >rroj I -o o ~~ o ro t ~. ~• a o: Q ~+ o n ro ~ a; 7 ~+ ~ 7 w ~ ~ y i 7 4~ G ~+• ~ ro? '~ ro In r+' W O 17 ~+•', N A i a i i c ro .a a I ., I .-'. (n I H. h r+. M . ~ a ~.• ro a I o', o ' A a h 4 ~ ~ ~ ~ o II -~ l 7: < I,. ~, 7 ... ~ ~ ro ; ro '; K i0 O (a i ~I ;:" I N 7 ~~ I i 3' ro ~. 'I ro ' y in 7 < I i r!I ,-• n I a ro ij ~ l o N N ~ 111 I ~ . ~• W ..• UIIo b~ i W'O+ Ai N .J' -~ -- W N l11 W N N' N lnb .~. AU1 0+: ~~ W -~. o i~ o~' o o ~I'- o, o In u1 •d! IA AW -~ NSW W' o •.1-- b l n ... , W -~N OD Ul'm N-.W -- A~OD Ni'ooWlA NAUTA N U1OmbN I i I I N:~ w to m -~ ~1 N W N OO o U1,-• N' •J -J W W A,N411AC~ Ii N:,W ~'~ W Nlo b -J'. A ~ P,~ iA W b Ul ~o A A N 0 W rn N -~bNw ~'. Ui A QD ~, A OD N ~.1 A,o T'I b A b-.1 N', W 4'+ Q+ ~ P Ai d0 -J A; O+ ... ~ N ~i -~ -~ N I. p~ p'~ Q+ O~ b 00 -a', m w b ~ A o! 0 N •d! W ~' A A t11:0+ w ~.1 W c+' ut WA A AIA b ~l A b' 4~ • I• oI b 00 ••1' 4P -J Vl W -":OD -~ N W N ~. pp .~ A A'00 -J -~ ~ N ~l -~' A --; W b b -- w'I b ~ ~i~ N (1+, 00 rob i i I A A' W b ~' 411 N •J' m O+ A b O O'O W N ; ... O O,O m ct'r .• ro . ro ro 7 v] nro~• ~ '7 N O a ~ ~ -- a a ' -~ r fH w i< mMro O a 7 7 a a7i n''. w ~. a `+i -~ 2*', ~• d i n ~ w '+•'. a 7 ~ N ~ N `~ rtl `~ i O' _. In -.1 00 oo-.lA w •.1: m b o.b Oo om w. N b', -J O' b W W I11 W c+ ~~~ ao'' bl b lrl 4P N ~ ~ o A A NI w' J O+ o -J ~J N GD ~ ~, v, N b' -J b W' N 11: ~ ~ tb 0 of N W o' o 4~ o N 00 T,W A A~ Ul b a+ lJ1 a' ~ A W b '~ 1 c I 1 4 I u5 j I ro i I ~ ~ 1 , 1 m x I ~ 3 1 ro O' I 1 7 7•. 1 a .+. 1 ~„• ? I 1 .w ,••~ ~' I G ,t ' ~ 1 7 ' ro ~ N j I m o~' I 1 7 C I n ~+ ' I C N ' I 9 ~ i U a ', i 1 7 71 1 a a! 7 ~. 1 n 7 ro~ 1 m 1 x I I G~ ~ ;1 ro 1 -cm7 1 -1 7 n. I do . C'~ I I 3 C 1 a -1 1 ro N G iI 1 7 ; '1 ro II I a ni I I ~ G' I I a 31 l i n m ' ro 71 I roI I 1 a, I ~ ~ ' I fD N' ~ O I c m I aa:7 m 1 ro \ C ~ i I ~ B ro 1 o Q 7 I -n a ' N I n I ro I a G " i. ro o N '4 m ~ ' 'TI x M !moron ', n 7 0 ~r a=.. .a ri 3 G ,<I !O'1 z ro o' -1 N ~ _. zi 1 mo ~ w, '' a n 7' I N C O' ' B ~ ~I O Q ro! ~ ~ ~ I d 7 .C. nn I --I ro ~ ' m In ,a ~ ~ a M. ,~7a ,wa ~ \ D b •O o~ I 1i a I ~ o b '0 I -•1 fi7 mm •r o N o \ o -- o i~ b p j I ~ R I ro I ~i O' I y~'. rfi I D ~ y N w. •.c. <a r .T .+ F U N bJ d P } P 4 p p i ' 0; a0~' 0 000 00, ~D ~O v'I b v7 ~O' 00 I. v7 ~t7 i ~ fit p V O+ O+ Ul ~ N l!1 ~ A W W; N i ~ i N Ni otno' Notl~ UIo Z ~ l I SI~~1 3m ~ p Hw 7 7 ~ .F ~ i 7 i < i Cn 7 O m j ro m a a 7~ '+~ ip x ~' 3 N v --1 0 7 ro o ro'i v •+ 3 i C ~• I n ~ o •+ '7 7 C ro 7 ro ~ ~ K D "I o C C o 0 a ~- 0~ r ro ~ r a 7 7 I y v m mjc~•-~• - a ro I -~ y a s z ,< I o j ~ ro -~ 7 m •-n alm s-+~ 7 m w I a ~..~ 7 a a~c ora~•~, o m C 7 -f y I n~ h ..• y ~ C 7 j z ul a s v n; m aom .+v m ro m I m N ~ CI ) "• j y -A -i a 7 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ II i ' . 7 a 7 'v N ` 3 N a m 7~ 0 0~ O c { N N ~ m 7 [L73M I I ~ .i ~ 0 0 ~ W ~1 3 Y• i i I ., .a a Cj N a o ~ f+ -fi N 7 ~ j m, i+• N O , ' I i 7 n a l I v a O+ W ( W I j .O .O -J Q+ N I° °N,1 ~ m o W u1 omo --A ' N fU ~D o ~O 00 N o o .P a . .p N ;. -+ A t o W O+ No omo j 00 ~0 Im A .,I i ,ooo NO ioAO ooo tno o+N i ~ ~ ~ ~ I .,lo 00 00 ' A N N ~ ~ v7 A 7 A I , I I uG , Dt ~ W W _ I o N I ~ A .. W N i m I w I oo w U1 ~1 t: I 00 fA ~1 O 00 -J 00 O W -'I I ~ CO A j A ; ^ 1 I ~ I ~ to .i N ~ In to `O T 4C o v N N i N N N fU ~I 'J a a ~ w -i O O W W ~ ~ ~' OD Od W ( ~ w W P ~ o+ A .A N { N I Cis G'1 b ~ (b j .o .o w ~ o to O ~ .O -d i O` tl i 00 W to W . IN ny - ~ loo ~ ~.U1 I M o -J W -•i `I I ~ N c9 i i m o OD 0 0+ ao A 0 0 0 .c m W m li m 74 O ~A -'Nl -yWU1 ornc VINO o.A< ~NoWoG,< ~Noo+o•Ac -~oocooo< 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O Q O O I i , o~oooo t. r. i I i I ooaoo~ A',W NN-' mUTA W-'~ ooUlaui ~ oaoooi -ovmf7~ I ncaDr•v' ~ I c, m n O ~-' C OI N •-• a a U', < O O' I .- 7 i N Q '7 i b .~•; .•~ O m! 7 -J'. G y~ N a N I n ~ i Q ~ • al 7 j'O 0, i a ~c W'. a -I 9 n ~' ~O ~-' C 7 I n y' m ..{ ~ a! '`~~ `' ~ m m~+ a a a~7 vrw 7~ •+ m ro; ~, , i 7 0 n n ~ N ~ < ' N i m x; ~~ 7 71 O '7 i ~• ~ 7 . x~ 7 O~i m r n I D ~I 1 < a',ro a 7~ ro', m ~~. o o 7 7 r ~+; >: ro m' n 7 t m o. .. o' m y ~+ ~ m .. ~•a N ~ '1i ~• O ~ ro ~ O O v o, 7! o y ~ j y 1 m , a. ~D Z a, a c n 9~ ~ n 7 3 C~~ "• a ~ _ O -~ W-+ A ill -rN41 A m oNfY;I W OD N.A oNM o+ o U1 OT N N o o~ N -J lJI Nm0oo U1 -- U1om~v; p. o 0 o N W o o UI OD c+ `~ ~p o ~ WW~i o i, oW uoOo N I ~ -. N o -~ W .O QO .,_ .i 000 0+ -j C+. ~ .o at A W W -~ w N00 I i i ~ N W O In ~ W I `o W ;ulo , In .o 'J ~ •o N U1 UI ~ is -" b N -•t Oo 00 U1 W 0+ ,li VI d .ta o l a0 IJII aN 4± U1 N Oi UAj1~jt W U~ N Oo ' o U1 o, a 00 .n ~OOO ~~o W ~ o Ul i u1 .r UI I -' -1 .n .p o~ o o Oo -+oOD~ .;. l o OooU1A VI UI W '~ o ~ ,q o .s -J N -J -.I tl ~., N N .A 'a o+ n N N -J I U1 UI 1 ~ I A o~ - IWPt, -+ N - 10+000 t W I ~ i~ N ~ to w ul ~0 OD O -~ w .n A UI N 4f~ -J A W o Ui ui m q 0 o Oo ~O N 0 q l0 A N ,I oa N ul ltl •J Ulc{VI N•.1 N UI -' .A a1 0 4J1 O O+ -J oW WUIN •.1 UI A W W W U1 m Oo Q1 • i •-~ W W a+ m ~d -J A 00 0} C Z v ~I O 1 1 tl0 "' C 1 a ~ ~ i ~O ' 7 j ~ ~~ a I I m x i 1 '~ 3 I m O 7 7 1 a ~+ ~• ~ 1 ~ C ~ ~ 7 1 ro UI I Imo 7 C I n ~+ 1 G N 3 ~ I v a , I '1 7 1 a a ~ I ~ ~~ I n 7' roo I ~m I ~x j ~ ro 1 -<m7 1 -i 7 0. 1 v n ~• I C 't 9 C Q 7 I IN C 7 1 m 1 W 7 ~ 1 °;n 1 c 1 a 3 I 1 7 Q 1 n ro I ro y I ro I a ~ i a'a-1 ' I Ol N tl C m I n a 7 m 1 ~ n x i I .Oi \ 3 m ~ I O G 7 1 -n a m, ~', OI y v G x N I ~! N I n T ~ m C i ro o -Oe N m ~l x I H ~ ~ ~ to m n n ~ o Inac ,r„•7 ~- h 3 C ~ O 7 Z m O -~ N ~ it = . A 1 m o 7 a 'an7 I N C O 3 x• 'iovm ~ 7 a 'v7< ',any. ~I -i ro 7 m N ~ ~ , - 7 a ,.,. '~~7a wa !o I i \ D Ian ~ o •~ 7 ' ..1 ~' O N tl ~ D D -1 Gl mm ~p N o +o 0 •~ N .n 0 ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER "`~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: December 18, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: Accounts Paid - October 1990 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Payments to Vendors: Payroll: 10/12/90 $ 435,522.65 10/26/90 445,583.25 881,105.90 $3,131,173.90 881,105.90 $4,012,279.80 A detailed listing of the payments is on file with the Clerk to the Board of Supervisors. Respectfully submitted, Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs Approved Denied Received Referred To Approved by, ~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator Motion by: Eddy Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: December 18, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: Accounts Paid - November 1990 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Payments to Vendors: $4,913,082.67 Payroll: 11/09/90 $ 436,805.52 11/21/90 468.999.64 905,805.16 905.805.16 $5.818,887.83 A detailed listing of the payments is on file with the Clerk to the Board of Supervisors. Respectfully submitted, ~~ ~~7 Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance Approved by, ~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator -------- ------------------------ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs Approved Denied Received Referred To Motion by: Eddy Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers December 18, 1990 County staff requests the Board to adopt a motion to enter into executive session within the provisions of the Virginia Freedom of Information Act as follows: (a) to discuss actual litigation, Fralin and Waldron Inc. v. Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, in accordance with Section 2.1-344.A.7. of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended. (b) to discuss the employment of specific public employees in the Department of Social Services in accordance with Section 2.1-344.A.1. of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended. °~^~' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, DECEMBER 18, 1990 RESOLUTION 121890-5 CERTIFYING EXECUTIVE MEETING WAS HELD IN CONFORMITY WITH THE CODE OF VIRGINIA WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia has convened an executive meeting on this date pursuant to an affirmative recorded vote and in accordance with the provisions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and WHEREAS, Section 2.1-344.1 of the Code of Virginia requires a certification by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that such executive meeting was conducted in conformity with Virginia law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby certifies that, to the best of each members knowledge: 1. Only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements by Virginia law were discussed in the executive meeting which this certification resolution applies, and 2. only such public business matters as were identified in the motion convening the executive meeting were heard, discussed or considered by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. On motion of Supervisor Robers, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: ~~~~~ Mary H. llen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors CC: File Executive Session File AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, DECEMBER 18, 1990 RESOLUTION 121890-6 OPPOSING THE CURRENT COST REDUCTION PROGRAM PRESCRIBED BY THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors recognizes the financial burden facing the State of Virginia and its localities, and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors supports measures aimed at maximizing the efficient delivery of services at all jurisdictional levels, and WHEREAS, the Board supports the most equitable distribution of burden as a result of the budget shortfall, including opportunities at the regional and state, as well as local levels, and WHEREAS, the determination of an equitable distribution requires considerable study and input from the localities affected, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors stringently opposes the current cost reduction program prescribed by the Virginia Department of Social Services and recommends that no action be taken prior to July 1, 1992 or until thorough evaluation of an alternative action at the regional and state, as well as local levels, be completed. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: NAYS: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers None A COPY TESTE: cc: Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors File The Honorable L. Douglas Wilder, Governor, Commonwealth of Virginia The Honorable Dudley L. Emick, Jr., Senator The Honorable J. Granger Macfarlane, Senator The Honorable C. Richard Cranwell, House of Delegates The Honorable G. Steven Agee, House of Delegates The Honorable Clifton A. Woodrum, House of Delegates The Honorable A. Victor Thomas, House of Delegates Mr. Howard M. Cullum, Secretary, Health & Human Resources Dr. Mabel G. Wells, Chair, State Board of Social Services Mr. Larry Jackson, Commissioner, Virginia Dept of Soc Serv Mrs. Mary Lou Mullis, Botetourt County Dept of Soc Serv Mr. John Wilcher, Craig County Dept of Social Services Mrs. Barbara Driver, Alleghany-Covington Dept of Soc Serv Mrs. Shirley Hall, Clifton Forge Dept of Social Services Mrs. Betty Lucas, Roanoke County Dept of Social Sevices Mr. Don Myers, Assistant County Administrator it M` AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, DECEMBER 18, 1990 ~% RESOLUTION 121890-7 OF APPRECIATION TO WAYLAND H. WINSTEAD FOR HIS DEDICATED SERVICE TO THE ROANORE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION WHEREAS, Wayland H. Winstead has served on the Roanoke County Planning commission since January of 1986; and WHEREAS, Mr. Winstead served as Chairman of that Commission from January, 1987, until December, 1988; and WHEREAS, Mr. Winstead received the Virginia American Planning Association's Local Government Official Award in 1989 for his advocacy of the modern planning process and citizen participation in that process; and WHEREAS, Mr. Winstead's leadership and innovative thinking have provided Roanoke County with guidance and a firm foundation for the future; and WHEREAS, Mr. Winstead's commitment to the planning process has made Roanoke County a better place in which to live and work. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors does hereby express its deep appreciation and gratitude to WAYLAND H. WINSTEAD for his dedication and commitment to the planning process in Roanoke County; and FURTHER, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors wishes Mr. Winstead the best in his future professional and community endeavors. On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: ~- AYES: NAYS: cc: .-- Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers None File Resolutions of Appreciation Planning Commission File Terry Harrington, Director, A COPY TESTE: Mary H. A en, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors File Planning & Zoning y AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, DECEMBER 4, 1990 RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION TO WAYLAND H. WINSTEAD FOR HIS DEDICATED SERVICE TO THE ROANORE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION WHEREAS, Wayland H. Winstead has served on the Roanoke County Planning commission since January of 1986; and WHEREAS, Mr. Winstead served as Chairman of that Commission from January, 1987, until December, 1988; and WHEREAS, Mr. Winstead received the Virginia American Planning Association's Local Government Official Award in 1989 for his advocacy of the modern planning process and citizen participation in that process; and WHEREAS, Mr. Winstead's leadership and innovative thinking have provided Roanoke County with guidance and a firm foundation for the future; and WHEREAS, Mr. Winstead's commitment to the planning process has made Roanoke County a better place in which to live and work. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors does hereby express its deep appreciation and gratitude to WAYLAND H. WINSTEAD for his dedication and commitment to the planning process in Roanoke County; and FURTHER, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors wishes Mr. Winstead the best in his future professional and community endeavors. LAW OFFICES OSTERHOl1DT, FERGl1SON, NATT, AHERON £~ AGEE A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 1919 ELECTRIC ROAD, S. W. CHARLES H. OSTERHOUDT P O BOX 20068 MICHAEL S. FERGUSON EDWARD A. NATT ROANOKE, VIRGINIA MICHAEL J. AHERON 24018 G. STEVEN AGEE MARK D. KIDD December 12, 1990 Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, Virginia 24018 Gentlemen: iz,~~-~~ TELEPHONE 703-7 74- 1197 FAX NO. 703-7 74-0961 This letter is written to advise that the Petitioner desires to withdraw the request previously filed by the Roanoke Lodge No. 284 Loyal Order of the Moose requesting permission to build a firing range for our members. The matter is presently scheduled for consideration before the Board of Supervisors on December 18th. We appreciate your cooperation throughout this matter but have determined that it is in the best interest of all parties to withdraw the request. Very truly yours, OSTERHOUDT, FERGUSON, NATT, AHERON & AGEE, P.C. ~.~ O, ~ ~- Edward A. Natt EAN/dle c: Mr. Whittemore P. O. Box 538 Salem, Virginia 24153 Darlene Hess 2882 Carvins Cove Road Salem, Virginia 24153 Mr. Al Randolph P. O. Box 7914 Roanoke, Virginia 24019 LAW OFFICES F 6 ,~~~ OSTERHOl1DT, FERGIISON, NATT, AHERON £~ AGEE A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 1919 ELECTRIC ROAD, 5. W. CHARLES H.OSTERHOUDT P. O. BOX 20068 TELEPHONE MICHAEL S. FERGUSON EDWARD A. NATT ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 703-774-1197 MICHAEL J. AHERON 24018 FAX NO. G. STEVEN AGEE 703-7 74-0961 MARK D. KIDD November 12, 1990 Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, Virginia 24018 Gentlemen: This is to advise that I have been retained by the Rod & Gun Club of Roanoke Moose Lodge No. 284 in the matter involving their request for special exception which is scheduled for hearing before the Board of Supervisors at 7:00 p.m. on November 13th. The Moose Lodge approached me earlier this morning and therefore I way not able to comply with the new County requirements regarding continuance requests. However, I am requesting a continuance on this request for a period of one month in order to enable me to meet with my client, and those other persons who are affected, in order to attempt to come up with a satisfactory resolution. This request does appear to be appropriate and would be of beneficial use to many service organizations in the Roanoke County area but we would like for it to be prepared and presented in a proper manner. Therefore, we are requesting this continuance. We will appear at the Board of Supervisors meeting in accordance with the latest policy. However, we are providing copies of this continuance letter to the affected adjoining property owners. Very truly yours, OSTERHOUDT, FERGUSON, NATT, AHERON & AGEE, P.C. Edward A. Natt EAN/dle c: Adjacent Property Owners Mr. Emmett Sherril 2034 Broyles Lane Roanoke, Virginia 24012 1 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. ~ ~,~ i.2~d - J AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: November 13, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: Petition of Roanoke Moose Lodge #284 to obtain a Special Use Permit to operate a shooting range. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR' S COMMENTS : ~~~~~~ ~~~y'"~ " ~ BACKGROUND: Roanoke County Code states that it is unlawful for any person to hold and operate any outdoor shooting match within the County unless a Special Use Permit has been obtained from the Board of Supervisors. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: See "Attachment A" memorandum dated October 31, 1990 to Board of Supervisors and memorandum, from Roanoke County Police Department, dated July 23, 1990. ALTERNATIVES• Alternative No. 1: Deny the petition for a Special Use Permit to operate a shooting range due to potential safety and noise concerns. Alternative No. 2: Approve the petition for a Special Use Permit to operate a shooting range. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Alternative 1. Respectfully submitted, Terrance L. Harring Director of Planning and Zoning Approved by, C% ~ri+'H'ar Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ~/ .~ ~~ ~~ ~'" Action Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by Eddy Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers Vote No Yes Abs MEMORANDUM ~'~ ~~ '-~ To: Roanoke County Board of Supervisors From: Janet Scheid, Planning Department Re: Request for a Special Use Permit to Operate a Shooting Range Date: October 31, 1990 The Rod and Gun Club of the Roanoke Moose Lodge No. 284 has requested a permit to operate a shooting range and hold shooting matches on a regular basis. This Lodge is located off of Route 311 and is in the Catawba Magisterial District. Nature of Request: The Lodge proposes that firearms be limited to handguns, shotguns, and muzzle-loading weapons. Rifles above .22 caliber, skeet shooting, and trap shooting would not be allowed. Members would be allowed to use the range along with area police officers, upon request. The Lodge proposes to operate the range Monday through Friday from 5:00 p.m. to dusk and on weekends from 12:00 p.m. to dusk. Applicable Regulations: Section 4-51 of the Roanoke County Code states that it is unlawful for any person to hold and operate any outdoor shooting match within the County unless a Special Use Permit has been obtained from the Board of Supervisors in accordance with the County Zoning Ordinance. Section 4-52 lists the general conditions for the issuance of a Special Use Permit for a shooting match: 1. The location of the shooting match must be such that. .the target area and impact area are not located in such a way as to endanger citizens and property; and the person or organization conducting such shooting match shall provide appropriate barriers to provide maximum protection to the public. 2. The shooting match area must be defined on the ground by warning signs every fifty (50) feet to insure that citizens will not stray into the range area. 3. A site plan (drawn to scale) of the shooting match range or areas showing the firing points, target area, and access to the area shall be submitted. In addition, Section 4-53 requires that a written investigative report from the Chief of Police be submitted to the Board of Supervisors before the issuance of any special use permit for a shooting match. This investigative report is attached. ~~ Page Two Memo to BOS Shooting Range Site Characteristics: The site consists of approximately 25 acres of mostly open land. Besides the Lodge itself there are two parking lots, a swimming pool and pool house on the property. Site Layout: The proposed shooting range site will be located in the southeast corner of the Moose Lodge .property (see attached concept plan). This location is approximately twenty-five feet from the south and east property boundaries. Sergeant G.W. Roche of the Roanoke County Police Department inspected this property. He recommends that a dirt, bullet backstop be constructed, that warning signs every fifty feet be erected, and that a pole be erected along the backstop to fly a warning flag. For more information on Sergeant Roche's site recommendations please refer to the attached memorandum dated July 23, 1990. Neighboring Area: The property is bordered on the south side by residential properties and on the east and north sides by property owned by the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors - Whispering Pines Park. Staff has discussed this petition with Mr. Jim Jones, Roanoke County Parks and Recreation Department. Mr. Jones and Mr. Steve Carpenter, Director of Parks and Recreation, are concerned about the potential negative impacts this proposed land use may have on the park both in terms of citizen safety and noise. The proposed shooting range is approximately twenty-five feet from the park boundary. The park facilities currently include a softball field and picnic shelter. Both of these facilities are heavily used. Since March 1990, the ball field has been used by 38 teams resulting in approximately 21,000 park user visits. Based on reservations, the picnic shelter has been used, since May 1990, by approximately 1,611 citizens. There are no statistics on how many other citizens have utilized the. park facilities and grounds. The Parks and Recreation Department Master Plan for this park includes a circular trail around the border of the park property. This trail would pass within approximately twenty-five feet of the shooting range. The trail is currently under construction with more work and completion scheduled for this winter. Staff is of the opinion that there exists serious land use conflicts between the proposed shooting range and the Roanoke County park. As proposed, the shooting range is potentially dangerous to citizens using the park. This is especially true for children who may not be as aware of warning signs posted around the perimeter of the shooting range area. In addition, the noise created by the shooting range will detract from the park setting and environment. ROANOKE COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT M E M O R A N D U M ~tE~1O TO: Captain J. H. McCorkle Sergeant G . Ui Roche ~r'w"- FRO`,1: DATE July 23, 1990 S~:DJECT: Inspection Assigr~rnent, Reference Firing Range Permit On July 16, 1990, at 1700 hours, I met the applicant, '~Ir. :-Iarold Reene, at the ;Moose Lodge on Catawba Valley Drive. ~Ir. Keene escorted me to the location of the proposed shooting range. This area is an old firing range located in a rear corner of the tiioose Lodge property. The actual shooting lanes of the proposed facility are approximately fifty feet inside the property boundary. ;sir. Keene said the scale drawing, required by the permit, had not been completed. He said that he did not realize that someone would be assigned to visit the site this quickly. Further, he stated that they were looking for suggestions as to what to construct in order for the permit to be approved. I walked the area with the applicant. During this time, he stated that the types of firearms that would be used at the site were shotguns, muzzle-loading rifles, and handguns. He advised that they would not be shooting high-powered rifles, nor skeet-trap type birds for the shotgun. I advised Mr. Keene that the following points needed to be addressed prior to the formal application being submitted for a special use permit. 1. Construct a bullet backstop of dirt at least four feet wide at its narrowest part (top). This backstop must cover the entire width of the range and be at least fifteen feet high from the ground. 2. Remove metal sheets formerly used to post targets. 3. Place warning signs every fifty feet around the borders of the range. In addition, signs should be placed every fifty feet along the corner of the property boundary where the range is located. ~. The permit for the range should approve its use only for handguns, shotguns, and muzzle-loading weapons. No rifles above .22 long rifle caliber, no skeet shooting, nor trap shooting should be allowed at this facility. ~. A flagpole should be erected along the backstop. This item ~'~` ~ ~ " ~'".~. ~'~ --0 would be used to fly a warning flag whenever the range would be in use. The language in the warning signs around the boundaries would explain the flagpole to anyone entering the property and the mean ing of a flag flying upon it. 6. Complete the scale drawing with the improvements outlined above included in the diagram. The range would have to be inspected again after the above recommenda- tions have been completed. It should provide a safe and enjoyable recreation area to the members of the lodge and the public at that time. mm .. ~ .boa sso ROANOKE COUNTY \`~ APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL EXCEPTION USE /~//d ~G l'~~~ T / ~ ~„<~"i Me. a~ (2~r~o~pH 981- a~-3 i :~~~~~ 1. Applicant's Name: Roanoke Tfoose Lod~~e ~k284 Phone: 384-7172 Address: 3233 Catawba Vallev Drive Salem, VA .Zip: 24153 2 . Property owner's name Roanoke rfoose Lodge X6284 Address: P. o. Box 538 Phone: 384-7172 Salem, VA Zip: 24153 3. Location of Property: Rte. 311, Catawba Valley Drive Size of property 25.25 acres/sq.ft. Size of proposed special exception use 4,200 -acr$s,/sq.f t. 4. Tax Map ~: 16,03-1-46 Old Tax Map ~; 5. Zoning Classification: ~ 6. Magisterial District Location: Catawba 7. Existing Land Use: Fraternal Organization 8. Proposed Special Exception Use: Shooting Ratige 9. Comprehensive Plan Designation: Rural Village 10. Proposed Annual Gross Revenue: Non-profit Value of Land Value of Proposed Buildings Value of Machinery & Tools Number to be Employed 11. Check Completed Items: 24 x 36 x x plot plan ~; Consultation X List of adjacent property owners x Letter of Application R Filing fee made payable to "County of Roanoke" $20 Special Use Permit for sanitary fill method garbage and refuse site, commercial amusement park, or airport $40 All other Special Exception Us 12. Date of Application: 13. Applicant's Signature: 14. Owner's Signature: ~~-~.~" ~ ROANOKE L D ~ ~ ~ O GE No. 284 LOYAL ORDER OF MOOSE Mailing Address: ('O. Box 538, Salem, Va. 24153 Phone: 384-7172 •- - _ __ :.. ,.., --- --- - f..i'i~"•i~ ~';r!.i L~. l'dl"i:.t't~'tf;i~tl'"'- __ _ i ' _- ;_~ L: L: _T i._ ~:_, ..,_ o ,- '~ I^ 7. I'"i (::I ~-~: c~+. n CI E.:' _ _ , _ _ _. _ _ _ -. .. i i C) d r ' U t.) LI i i .. C t ` i "_: cl ~ I C i~, ~: ,... ,-•~ ~-: t-. •_: -. r.: c: ~;- .. '~_ 9 .. ... , _.. :• :_...... "~'='r'i~:+i ~=~'_~ l r~l~i 1, l_~ bI i l l d tit '~' .. ,.., ~ _ _ _ _ L.. _ _ __. .. ~ ... .. '. _.: q .. y -:1 '~;iGt~i_l r~?y ~--; .:.~i IT~i ~I .: ,'1.: =-"l;~ct(j 11~~..1 __~j(~:= __. !~... i~...~~_.. _., _.___ ~- 'nl - I ::~ r' 1 i~ ~ t' C ct a. i =~ :_" ~ ~` ; S ~:: E' t_: j: c. h C' :-! ~ ~ .. !: P' .-t J __ ~' ~ _.. . ~.. i. i..., Cj . J y l! - c. 1 lJ (r:. ~_ ~~ c. - - - -.. _ _ :.:; r. .:._ ~: :. ! : ~_: i ~-t '-- L i ~., `., . 4aJ k; !PJ .L 1 1 C? i t_i t:. 7.. ? i.-i .: , _ _. r ~ _ ~~ t l.i +: .? r" t L: ` -~. 1. ~'. ::• i`i t_i (_! , -- i..t r'~'~: ). `_~_ 'iliC~rl ~:~: ~';` ;~cr Ci~`.:`iC c:'I'"i cal t....=i: G.!t-~C.~=r't:: 1~i ~+i:: L.:!' COI'I';fTl ~; r'i .',. t`{„ j''~!i_€i1t~E: t''C. :•- 1 ~'_ 1. --~ ~ . ' ~.a 1 ~[~ <' Ll I" :::: _ ~- .. + -- - ~. ._ . .. ~ ~ ~ - a ' 7 - - L- .. ._ (\:.-' ~ c(r_~ 1...: ,_ :-! .:. r-' h~-' .~ ~ c:. ~ _ -_ r~ ~..~ _. ,_ ~ 1 :.. _i n ~ t .... _ i ~ .: L_ _.. s. i.. _! f ~i C. !'~ _~ _. , , n ~ . _. !' I ~.. ~ c _. , : :..:: '. F::. L- o ~ c; •_ ,._ : .::._ r't (~ c. t: n ~ t4: u r . 1. l I_I I::? • i _. t C" 'J~,_' t~dli:. Cii' L.__1.1...IL! {-;Ei.' r_ril...i,._j~_ !':.~_.._ ca"`; ~.i:l _l:_ai-t !'-1-' ._;.`{ ~'~ _1 :_; [::. "` _r .: - .. _ , - ~ -- i I - ; :. _~.: 1;.. 1_a"; t•J C (::! r. ~ f I (.1 _ : ~ t C_ 71 i ° t ~ : t ~ r: - I : - _ . ,,. ~ _ ~. _ .r.:et.:. C:;; t1=,-_ar-' C!n dil?-~• ~:t x(1.7. ~'iir1-- th~~ r-,.rlr_~~=- ~ - ~~r t..:n , ] 1 .. _ e-. ~ ~; ~.; t_' ~: 1 n !:. h ~~ a r, r:] ~a :•J 1 i, rI i_ u t ~:( - I .._ ,_ __ i i:_ ;_:' r" i n = h :~ r',~ ~ :: TF?er~E:' t:Jill br w~tl^r-iin~ ..~i.ran=_~ _: •;~_:r-'' ~~? ~ _'e':: :~r+~~;nd t~h~ b~~~ar-'d~r=~ of the r, a.r,~~. Fl •flagpole t}Ji ~]. bey er~Cted aJ;.i;l-i ~ a!ar,ning flacl f].yinca ~:•J h e r i e ~. G r t -; F=' I ° c:i n C-I C' 1 ~• 1 n 1.1 ~. C' . t~ F' +'= 1 ]. ]. h c! `,~ c: 4J c:t t~ I"1 ]. n ~_i `-~ 7. [~ r_i ~ l r'' n:_.l rl d ~• h ~ ~.! O I_i n d ~_: r'' 1 i:? ~: IC't' f: i`? r? ~t r- CJ j ~ e i'' t { (-.' }; F? l it. 1 n %. n ri t i'1 t::'. t' :_t. J~ •~ n +~ t' cl n CI t . 1. i !C+_! t"'E'~I_tii'E:i' c1.n`y' ctdd].t1(=1 -7c~.1 ln~'C?t~;il~~(i 1C+nq C!t' ~"IcZ`~`E' C~CtE?=;T7.C~i':e: r' 1. ti c(r +_~ 1 n Ci _ i l i~ ctrJ C; ~.' (~ 1 I-i ~' O r' ITi c(t ~. O r-; q ~ l ~? <_i.'_.',? t' F C' ]. ~' I'" t~ (? is D C ~ l l ;';'i c? ;-i 'i _~ ~'~~ .... Lodge Located From 1-81, Exit 41 On SR 311, North r s J s a j a o. ~~ ° ° ~ ~ ~" .o c m ~~ S p4•a5'00' E s ,: ~ i .. ' 566.90 $ _ Q 0 0 o U ~ ~~ O O ~ E o cp ~ 8 ~ ~ N O ~ V o C W S O 'N ~ ao ~ '. O ry /b h h / O+ ° ° . ~ ' ~ a °~° o° ~ Z N ~ I ~ a ~ a; o m C ~ I ~n o mr ~ z - o , r, ~ o a~ L a~ ~ ~ cn ~ , ~ -~ n-- ~ o ~ O ~ ~ L o O ~ ~ , s N W ~ O ~ ^ I N O O.~ •~~ ~ ~ ~ M E ! I ~ ~ CJ N ~- C ~ Z 0 i 8~8 i ~ ~ (l') ' ~- ~ S = `t O a im O ~ qS ~ ~ ~~'04 p5 `s ~ o ~ ° ~° ~~e`~ ~, o ~ `QQ ~ 69 0`I, ti G~ X11 ~~~e -~.~' - ~~ . .• • •~N flLYSO-0q e . ~,~ ~~ •~ „~,; „fi %' i ~: .,.,o ~ `~ - --: VICINITY MAP ~~~, f COMMUNITY SERVICES AND DEVELOPMENT ~~/ i19o -l NORTH Roanoke Moose Lode .lo. 284 Special :lse Perm t r A-121890-8 Item No . ~ ~- AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER IN ROANOKE, VA ON TUESDAY, MEETING DATE: December 18, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: Request of Rajesh Desai, owner of the Budget Motor Lodge, to obtain a Special Exception Permit to operate a home for adults, located at 7656 William- son Road, in the Hollins Magisterial District. COUNTY ADMINISTRATORS COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: See attached staff report. ALTERNATIVE 1: Approve the request for a Special Exception Permit to operate a home for adults with the following conditions: (1) The home for adults shal l be 1 invited to the one story building existing on the site (marked as Building "E" on the plat submitted) and shall be occupied by no more than 27 residents. (2) All facilities associated with the home for adults to be fully sprinkled. ALTERNATIVE 2: Deny the request for a Special Exception Permit. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Alternative 1. Respectfully submitted: Approved: Terrance arring n Elmer C. Hodge Direct of Pla ing County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION No Yes Abstain Approved (x) Motion by: Harry C. Nickens Eddy ~- Denied ( ) to approve with conditions Johnson Received ( ) _~ Referred to McGraw ~_ Nickens ~- Robers ~_ cc: File Terry Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning Arnold Covey, Director, Development & Inspections John Willey, Director, Real Estate Assessment ' STAFF REPORT ~'2- ~~`'~- CASE NUMBER: SE 6-12/90 PETITIONER: Rajesh Desai REVIEWED BY: Jon Hartley DATE: December 11, 1990 Request of Rajesh Desai, owner of the Budget Motor Lodge, to obtain a Special Exception Permit to operate a home for adults, located at 7656 Williamson Road, in the Hollins Magisterial District. 1. NATURE OF REQUEST a. Petitioner is requesting a Special Exception Permit to convert one of the existing buildings located at the Budget Motor Lodge to a home for adults. The building proposed for the home for adults, labeled building "E", is the furthest of the three motel units from Williamson Road and presently contains 12 motel units in a single story struct- ure. This would be converted to 9 rooms, a kitchen, dining area, sitting room and offices. A covered walkway would be constructed to connect all of the rooms and facilities together. The maximum occupancy expected is 27 individuals. Each of the nine rooms would measure approximately 14 x 28 and would accommodate up to three people each, which complies with the minimum state standard. The two remaining buildings would continue to be operated as a motel. b. Attached concept plan and zoning vicinity map describe the project more fully. 2. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS a. B-2, General Business, permits a wide variety of commercial uses. A Special Exception Permit is required to operate a home for adults. The ordinance defines a home for adults as "a facility that provides shelter and services which may include meals, housekeeping and personal care assistance primarily for the elderly. Residents are usually functionally impaired and socially isolated but otherwise in good health and are able to maintain a semi-independent lifestyle, not requiring the more extensive care of a nursing home." b. Unlike a rezoning where conditions must be volunteered by the applicant, conditions may be imposed on a Special Exception Permit by the Board of Supervisors. c. Site Plan review will be required to ensure compliance with County regulations. d. In addition to County standards, the home for adults must comply with the Standards and Regulations for Licensed Home for Adults which establishes minimum design and operating requirements. 3. SITE CHARACTERISTICS a. Topography: Property slopes gradually downward from the rear of the property to Williamson Road. b. Ground Cover: Property is in lawn and landscaped areas. 4. AREA CHARACTERISTICS a. Future Growth Priority: Situated within the Peters Creek Community Planning Area: designated for high growth. Currently served by urban services. b. General area is developed with a primary arterial highway (US 11) as well as mixed commercial, office, institutional (Hollins College) and residential uses. /..2.- ~1~ -.,~.. 5. LAND USE IMPACT ASSESSMENT Rating: Rate each factor according tc Use a scale of 1 through 5. 1 = positive impact, 2 = negligible disruptive impact, 5 = severe impact, the impact of the proposed action. impact, 3 = manageable impact, 4 = and N/A = not applicable. RATING FACTOR COMMENTS LAND USE COMPATIBILITY 2 Comprehensive Plan: 1985 Comprehensive Development Plan has placed this area within a Transition land use category. There are no specific policies or guidelines established for a home for adults. The Comprehensive Plan does encourage as highly compatible middle- high density residences (6-12 units per acre), high density residences (12-24 units per acre), and institutional uses. Based on these uses, a home for adults could be considered consistent with the Comprehensive Plan policies and map. 2 Surrounding Land: The adjoining uses consist of a home for adults and apartments to the west, open space and single family residences to the north and east, and commercial development to the south along Williamson Road. 2 Neighboring Area: Primarily mixed commercial and residential. 3 Site Layout: Predetermined by existing buildings. Building proposed for conversion shares access with the other two motel buildings. Parking for the home would be shared with the upper level of one of the hotel units. 2 Architecture: Architecture is predetermined by existing structures. Design of proposed modifications to buildings has not been indicated. 2 Screening and Landscaping: Screening and buffering, particularly along the eastern boundary of the property, may be required and will be addressed during site plan review and approval if this request is approved. N A Amenities: No amenities are proposed. N A Natural Amenities: TRAFFIC 2 Street Capacities: 1986 ADT for Williamson Road between Rt. 601 (just beyond County line in Botetourt County) and Peters Creek Road was 19,550. According to ITE, a home for adults would generate approximately 30 ADT versus the existing motel which could generate as many as 120 ADT. 3 Circulation: Access to the site is via a single entrance/ exit, which is also shared by a private road serving three residences. Improvements proposed by VDOT along Williamson Road would not affect the building proposed for conversion. UTILITIES 2 Water: Adequate source and distribution. 2 Sewer: Adequate transmission and treatment. DRAINAGE 2 Basin: Located in the Garvin Creek drainage basin. N A Floodplain: r-2~o-~Z PUBLIC SERVICES 3 Fire Protection: The Hollins District contains a large number of units (in excess of 1400 units) dedicated to and licensed for accommo- dating the elderly. Although this places an additional burden on fire and rescue service, the facility proposed in this petition is not viewed by the Fire and Rescue Department as increasing the existing burden of these facilities as a whole. Current codes and standards leave the sprinkling of buildings to local discretion. Fire and Rescue Department has asked that a condition be imposed by the Board of Supervisors, if approved, that would require all facilities associated with the home for adults to be fully sprinkled. 3 Rescue: See Fire Protection above. 2 Parks and Recreation: No outdoor facilities are proposed specifically for the occupants of the home for adults. Open lawn and landscaped areas would provide some space for passive recreation. N A Schools: N A TAX BASE ENVIRONMENT 2 Air: 2 Water: 2 Soils: 2 Noise: 2 Signage: Any additional signage would have to comply with the new sign regulations adopted in 1989. 6. PLAN CONSISTENCY This area is designated as Transition in the Comprehensive Plan. The pro- posed use, although not specifically mentioned, could be consistent with the comprehensive plan map and policies based on similarity to other uses. 7. STAFF EVALUATION a. Strengths: (i) Conversion to a home for adults would permit the reuse of an existing facility. b. Weaknesses: (1) The mixing of uses on this site, without the ability to physically separate the activities of each use, may create conflicts between permanent and more transient occupants. c. Conditions recommended by staff should this proposal be approved are: (1) The home for adults shall be limited to the one story building existing on the site (marked as Building "E" on the plat submitted) and shall be occupied by no more than 27 residents. (2) All facilities associated with the home for adults to be fully sprinkled. ZO J w a 2 3 2 fY S Q x 2 Q J W n J Q v 1}~ F d d d wt W d- z z 0 h 4 J K W 3 2 CBM FYe Sec. Z5 /Vovy or ~orrn fr/ rer»ai%~in9 c%s ~a,niso y ~/,~~~~~' N f Q W Z a J n ~r~/~ert`y 436.4' . ~ ' r r' ~ ~ i. ~' 9. 8 5~3 Qcres 6oundeo~ 6y corners / fo /3. l9 ~ ~• ~ ~ 3 4 °~ ' "~ ~ ~ Y ~ F4 ~ y F'e h N z POLE '~ °~ ~~ ?FV, y,~. r ] 8.1. 0 O , 45.G~BO O~ ~COIC `~~ ``~QyQ 0 KD ° y 4 ~ ~ '?` O N _68:55"E.-- xG~~ w+~ i '~o J~ P~~' ~ s ~ - o O e ` , Cf ~ PoIE Q~S `~{•~~ ~~ io 50.09 ,T'f ~ i '`' JAF'C/ eo Jo\`KJ ~~' \ 3r/ ~ v 4`/0o d~ ~ B yd~4 ~4 'fJ, `Q?L' .~I" ~ ~Q,~' e0 40' L% 6 I ~ ,O ' b0~/ L~O~,CV/~, O rOn C d~4 ~ N M kt o ~~ ~ ``* fit" /pv ~ ~ ~~ ~~ '~ A ---'- • ~. ~ 2y ` ^ - 161.2 co W B d ~Sj ~b J2 1. I ~ O W 1 ~ V1 ° ti P \.~, 'p ay T ~QO~ it O NI A ~ ' N 'tP ~'`r o V h ~ v z ,~ Q~ W s - ~ ,~ ~ err _ d, 1 N1 hl ~ N a W o_ 0 0 V w N off, N h } ,.~ z a J N 0 0 0 V u z 0 K 7 Z N 2 J W J u w W ~ ( W~ r ~~r Jill N~~"I K ~ W Old 293.3 •r 13 .n d' ~ "~ + I W -~ N is ._ w 5, 6?'06' W. I ° ~ JI ~ I o ~~9 t 8 J K y.- '~~ N !_ M /~/Ot I~ K 2 lxl CJC L • I X 1 '" I ~ t 3 ~o s ~ 7 r!o I 3 P/ontotion ResfQUrarr' 765 D ~, W Q n N r vl ~ N ? 1~ jj I ~ RR BED OF ANDONE RR dI I N`~II.~f'I 1 ' ~^ z ~I~ • r ~ ~ a~;' 13 i ' _ N• ~ KSE. 4 ° Z ~z4.1 ~ LOT L LO U' $TUTSMANI I ~ MAC I IN z t~ ~N tso.o c ~w 3 I ~~ M ~/ E ~ 6.5 pvT. RD. ~~ a/o~ l/o/%y ~nooi ~ -N.69'06'E., 10 5.0 ~~ N~ :^ p z N ~~ J Ny r tT0 ROANOKE Wc'lllA.nson /~oQO/ +$_69~076'W. ~__ U. S. HWY. RT, N0. ~ ~ ° LEE HIGHWAY EMACADAM •o 0 °D PAVEMENT~~ ~, TO HOLLINS-~' /V~f !IJ f/aoo/fi'ozord area pro f' Sf1oW/~9 /property OlC I~Q~jesh .~? I,esa~ &~~'~. ~/, l-~a t~ l ~~~ALTH 0~lr 9.8 ~3 arc B udy o f IYIo for L o oi9 e p .p 7G 56 W~'l/~nmsor~ good ,~~ C. B. MALCOLM~. JR~. ~~, Norfh of C'ty of ~ounoke i%~ S4/em Dist. v`~`~,~y„ / _~%" 72oanoke ~ouh ty, Vc'rylr/~ a . o~ CERTIFICATE N0. ~ serve e~/u/ /j /95y 63' C. B.Nfv/co/m ~ .Son ~, ,~ r Y Sfofe Cert. En9rs. ~ c ~00' ?I 66F- ~F. ~evrseo~ ~/u! /S, /9BG .~ ~. J~ I~.DLANDS~, _ z 2o7B3A~ ~ ~'~w ro/! ,~ / e~~~ sit _ `~ ., '•., `.~,,~~;}s. ^~ ~ . `' ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ // Z3 ~ ~ ~o ~ ~ ~ D ~ i^ a ... '. ~.,~ ~~ * . : WPO~~ • y I l 111 ,,~ _ o ~~. , g _ 'i1'V. ~' f - ~ '. '~ c • 4 _ ~ ;~ 1 ~ ,,, ~r ~ ~ ~..L. t: ~~ ; } . ~_ nr: „ . r w ~~ i m _ ~ ,.T ~,: _ ~ .+.~ ~+ (C10'fOR LOp6F EXt~ `" i : ~ ~, 'n .7666 wt~UamsoN aa. n.vV. ~... .~~:~ -;ti :~~,~, Roanox~. VA: 2yo19 ~ Q :r ;`~;~...r i x ~;.. . ~ ~ , a t ~' . a ± , /+ ~~ ~~;~ t s \ 'mot ~ ~7 t~ ~ ~, ~ ~ .i' `j `, i'. r~ ~~ ,~ <l s..i REsr uRAkr ~~- oFFicE =~ `~`- ~ ~ > ~ ~IIIIIIililllillllllllllillllllllllillllllilllllllllllll!IIIIIIl.1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111~ ~. , ~a ~. r APPEARANCE REQUEST s ~_ ~_ ~ ~ - AGENDA ITEM NO. l a y ~ ~~ c _ ~_ s = svBJECT a a ~ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supex~isors to recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter =_ CALLED TO THE PODIUM, c so that I may comment.WHEN _ _ WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE I "' _ _ _ RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINE LISTED BELOW. __ • Each speaker will be given between. three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to -- do otherwise. __ _ _ • Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Ques- tions of cl ' 'cation may be entertained by the Chairman. • All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. _ • Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. • INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FQR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT c THEM. _ PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO DEPUTY CLERK _ _ NAME 1~ ~ ~ ~ I-1 ~ I~ __ _ ADDRESS ~ 5 / ~ ~ ~ ~!~ ~ ~ A Nc __ PHONE 3 ~ ~ ~ 6 5 ~ ~ _. mlllllllillllllllllllllillllillllilllllllllillllllllllllilllllllllllllillilllilillllllllllllillllllllllllillillllllllilllillllll DENIAL A-121890-9 Item No. ~~~~ "' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER IN ROANOKE, VA ON TUESDAY, MEETING DATE: December 18, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: Special Exception Request of Robert Woodward to permit the sale of used cars on the premises at 3306 Brambleton Avenue, in the Cave Spring Magisterial District. COUNTY ADMINI STRATOR ~ S COMMENTS : ~~ ~~~,~,~~ ~ ~c,y~ BACKGROUND: Applicant desires special exception approval to expand an existing used vehicle sales business from the two parcels immediately west of the subject property.. Special exception status was granted to these two parcels on February 22, 1977, subject to the following conditions: 1. Private automobiles and pickup trucks no larger than 3/4 ton may be sold from the lot. 2. Directional lighting which shields residential property must be provided. 3. The used car lot may be open until 9 p.m. 4. Residential properties adjoining the rear of the area must be screened by a six-foot high visual barrier before cars can be placed on the lot. The visual barrier must be of a type that cannot be seen through at any time of the year. 5. The permit is to be revoked if all the restrictions are not followed. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: See attached staff report. ALTERNATIVE 1: Deny the petition for a Special Exception Permit. ALTERNATIVE 2: Approve the petition for a Special Exception Permit to permit the sale of used cars at 3306 Brambleton Avenue, with conditions contained in staff report. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends alternative 1. Respectful submitted: Terr nce rrin on Directo of Pl nning Approved: cam- ~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ACTION No Yes Abs Approved (x) Motion by: r, B. Rd Y tc Eddy x Denied ( ) DENY Johnson x Received ( ) McGraw x Referred Nickens x to Robers x cc• File Arnpl~ (`nvay_,_ Terry Harri ng "3;1 John Willey .~ ' STAFF REPORT /~~~ _. CASE NUMBER: BE 5-12/90 REVIEWED BY: TIM BEARD PETITIONER: ROBERT WOODWARD DATE: DECEMBER 18, 1990 Special Exception Request of Robert Woodward to permit the sale of used cars on the premises at 3306 Brambleton Avenue, in the Cave Spring Magisterial District. NATURE OF REQUEST a. Applicant desires special exception approval to expand an existing used vehicle sales business from the two parcels immediately west of the subject property. b. Concept plan and zoning vicinity map describe proposal more fully. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS a. The B-3, Special Commercial District permits a limited number of specialized, usually high-intensity commercial uses. A significant percentage of these uses require a Special Exception from the Board of Supervisors. b. VDOT has stated no objection to this petition. c. Site plan review will be required to ensure compliance with County .regulations. SITE CHARACTERISTICS TOPOGRAPHY: North portion of site is flat; south portion (rear) slopes severely upward to single-family residential property. GROUND COVER: Existing pavement, gas pumps, offices and car wash; rear slope exhibits mixed deciduous and scrub evergreen growth. AREA CHARACTERISTICS FUTURE GROWTH PRIORITY: Situated within the Cave Spring Community Planning Area. The growth initiative for Cave Spring is to stabilize growth. GENERAL AREA is developed with a dense combination of office, retail and general commercial, and single family residential uses. Urban services are available. LAND USE IMPACT ASSESSMENT Rating: Rate each factor according to the impact of the proposed action. Use a scale of 1 through 5. 1 = positive impact, 2 = negligible impact, 3 = manageable impact, 4 = disruptive impact, 5 = severe impact, and N/A = not applicable. RATING FACTOR COMMENTS LAND USE COMPATIBILITY 4 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: 1985 Comprehensive Development Plan has placed this area within a Transition land use category. The proposed use is discouraged with low compatibility in a Transition area. i.2~a-3 Specifically, the proposal is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan map and policies TR-1 (prevent haphazard commercial sprawl along major highways) , TR-7 (limit the frequency of driveway openings) , and TR-8 (enhance frontage development quality, particularly concerning building facades as compared to parking lots and signage). 3 SURROUNDING LAND: Single-family residential, retail and service commercial, and secondary and US highways. 3 NEIGHBORING AREA: Single-family residential, office, retail and service commercial and secondary and US highways. 4 SITE LAYOUT: Dictated by existing buildings and refueling area. No new buildings or pavement are proposed. Gas pumps and lighted over- head canopy are situated in the northwest corner of site while offices and an automatic car wash occupy the interior and a partially vegetated steep slope makes up the southern portion. Petitioner desires eight parking spaces be designated for used vehicle sales. County standards require a specified number of spaces for enclosed floor area, display lot area and employee parking. Subject site has inadequate area to both meet County standards and locate the desired number of used vehicles. Although the center access from Brambleton Ave. into the refueling area is not on the subject site, it is nevertheless blocked by used vehicles for sale and should either be closed or remain open and free of parked vehicles at all times. 3 ARCHITECTURE: Existing one-story brick car wash and office building; 12 pump refueling area covered by canopy adjacent to Brambleton Ave. 3 SCREENING AND LANDSCAPING: Per ordinance. Type D buffer yard and plantings/screening required on south (rear) border with single- family home. Existing vegetation should be supplemented by additional evergreens and/or fencing. Frontage planting and refuse area screening required. 4 AMENITIES: Site plan does not designate individual parking spaces. Preliminary indications suggest proposal will not meet minimum County parking design standards (see site layout and traffic circulation). 3 NATURAL AMENITIES: Partially vegetated steep slope in rear exhibits scrub evergreen and mixed deciduous growth. This slope provides the only existing buffer between subject site and residences to the south. TRAFFIC 3 STREET CAPACITIES: 1986 ADT for Brambleton Avenue: 21,450 vehicles; for View Avenue: 1,890 vehicles. 1987 accident rates: two on Brambleton Avenue between Brandywine Avenue and View Avenue; none on View Avenue between Brambleton Avenue and Castle Hill Street. 4 CIRCULATION: Interior traffic patterns are severely constrained by lot size and by existing building configuration. Parking spaces required and their standard minimum dimensions would necessitate the closure of the eastern access bordering View Avenue. The minimum 24- foot wide travel aisle cannot be achieved at this access point. Congestion is obvious with the existing combination of 18-20 used cars for sale on the adjacent tract and the car wash on subject site . Most important, any vehicles parked at the corner of Brambleton Avenue and View Avenue would complicate the already difficult left- hand turn from View Avenue onto Brambleton Avenue. UTILITIEB 2 WATER: Adequate source and distribution. 2 SEWER: Adequate treatment and transmission. DRAINAGE 2 BASIN: Mud Lick Creek. 2 FLOODPLAIN: Proposed change of use would have no effect on site drainage. PUBLIC SERVICES 2 FIRE PROTECTION: Within established service standard. 2 RESCUE: Within established service standard. N A PARRS AND RECREATION: N A SCHOOLS: TAX BASE 2 LAND AND IMPROVEMENT VALUE: $177,400 per applicant TAXABLE GROSS SALES/YEAR: $120,000 TOTAL EMPLOYEES: Two in used vehicle sales; four current employees for car wash. TOTAL REVENUE TO THE COUNTY/YEAR: Approximately $2,280 (improved real estate and vehicle sales tax). ENVIRONMENT 2 AIR: 2 WATER: 2 SOILB: 3 NOISE: Additional vehicle noise can be anticipated. 3 SIGNAGE: Two square feet per lineal foot of street frontage permitted. Subject lot is of such size that no additional freestanding signs could be installed due to the minimum 250 ft. separation requirement between freestanding signs. PLAN CONSISTENCY This area is designated as Transition. Petitioner's request is not compatible within the Transition land use category. The site fronts on a major thoroughfare and lies within the urban service area. Although the site rests within a commercial strip, it offers little buffer for area residents from its noise and lighting impacts. ~~ STAFF EVALUATION ~~ 90 -,,~ STRENGTHS: 1) Petitioner is not proposing any additional buildings or paved areas. 2) Adjoining site to the west currently enjoys special exception status. WEAKNESSES: 1) Proposed use is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan map and policies. 2) Parking and on-site traffic congestion would be exacerbated by this proposal. 3) Screening installed on the adjacent property (required by Special Exception condition in 1977) is deteriorating and in need of improvement. RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: If this application is approved, the following conditions are suggested: 1) Types of vehicles are limited to passenger cars and trucks not exceeding 7,500 lbs. gross weight. 2) Rear (south) slope will not be altered in any way other than to be planted and/or screened per recommendation of County staff. 3) No additional exterior lighting shall be installed. .. f' j f ` ; ~, N N p~ v! a .~ j Q O W v m ~' .~~b ;; ~~ i~ `~ M ~ .• ~s ~.;_ F, Z~~ Nyj -~-, , ~_ ,~ s ~~ 4 W V 0 0 ~~ oa ~ ~ W ~ yo ~ ~ 2 ~ W O IWjJ h 0 O ~ F h ~' ~ W ,~ ~ W Y oc 0 W O h ~ ~ ~ ~ W ~i ~ ~ 4 W ~; N o ~ tih `~ e W ~ 0~ N ~ ~~ ~ ~ h h~ ~~~Q' 9 ~ e W ~ Q ~~ ~ v n ~ ti h W ~ I f ~~~ /2gd I NORTS J ~ ,o,;, . „ a 1 0 _ ~ ~ ~ / a \,~ ~~ pood ~ J $ . _. 3 I ~ 31 1 w ~o. ' ~ ' 27 . 7 i ee ro A 3S 37 ~ ' ~,J 2s 4 J ~.„ a «,~ \„ ~, zt ~ ~ ~ a,~ r J ' g ~ q 2 ' •,r ~P J ~ / ' / ~ 2 is • • ' s J . I ~ O ; 1 ~~ ~~ 4'~ , g3 / ~ e ~ .4 io 2a I • ' 1 ~, ~ B2 ~ ~ ,~ ~ x ~ ~ ,o ~ BZ ~ B2 o ~~~ 11 ~~ ~ • vNe 24 =~2 8 ~ Pa - ~ B1 / 7 ~ 23 ,r~' 81,9.. '4 ~ , B2 ' ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ . , ~ ~- ~r`* R • 14 R per 2 y ~ ~' o• ' 13 11 B2 E32 5~\~/ . ~o e't ' J '~B2 ~ - -~ B•1~i B~ _ it ~ ' ~'A ~ ~ 2 ~y, ~" 2 / 63 33 ~ . ~ ~ 62 ~ 61 s. ~ I DAe J B ~ B2 I ~ ~ ~ 2 1 g I ~ >s I I . J . s 30 62 . 1662 ~ 6 I 17 B2~ 37 ~ ~. ' .. 29 67 • / ~ ~ ~ le ~ B2 I ~ 0~~ ~ B3 g e I • • ~ B 2 • g ~ ~ 3e • ~ ~ B2 • 3s ~ ~-~ ` ~ ~2 ~ ~ ~ ,s .pB I -- is -. ~~~ ~ ~ 1 22 • 2 2 ~ ~ .,, 24 62 . - -N ~Gd~ ~ ~ Z , BQ B ~ I 16 ~ ~ R z •r ~B2' ~ --- ~• • p ~ 1 J ~•O ---- ~ ~ 2 s ~-~ J K ~ 2 41 ~- .u 2282• ~ --- e ~ . ~ ~ ~ r 42 • „ 21 B 2 . Ji • ~ Z ~ 13 . „ 20 B 2 . ~ - Ji 1 _ ~2 ~ ~ 4 • ~ X24 , 'b iy • • J .y II ~ 4 NOTE ~•• ALL PARCELS ON THIS P ~~ •• , "" a + ~ ARE ZONED RL, UNL~ 24 • I ~ i° _ ,~ ,a ~~ .., s. ' ~ OTHERWISE INDICATED. COMMUNI?YSERYICES ~OD~=~~ ':~IOODw~;RJ ANDDEYELOPMENT ~ S?ECI!~~ ~~::~!'TIO.i: DSED CARS ~iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii~iiiiiii~iiiiiiiiii~iisieii~iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii~ - ~,.a. ... ., ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ - APPEARANCE REQUEST _ - _ _ _ _ _ - _ - - G ~ ,~ - _ - - AGENDA ITEM NO. / ~ _ - _ - _ - SUBJECT ~ t-, w" ~ ~S~ ~.~ -, T - - I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter - so that I may comment.WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE = RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES - _ - _ LISTED BELOW. __ • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment _ whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will = decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed bythe-majority of the Board to - - do otherwise. • Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Ques- tions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. c • All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. _ • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. • Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. • INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED = GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT' c - - - - THEM. - - PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO DEPUTY CLERK _ _ - _ __ - _ - - NAME ~~L(~~ (~~~L. % Z-~~~ - - - - - _ ~~ p (~ = ADDRESS ~ ~~ ! 1 ~ ~ ~- S l !` ~ ~~ ~ c`-' - = - - -_ - - / _ c PHONE ~ ~ ~' - ~ " ~~ - = c m~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ _ - - _ _ ~ , ~ ., _ ~~ :~.~ _ _ ~ ~, _ _ - - APPEARANCE REQUEST _ _ _ _ - _ _ ~3 - ~ Z ~~, - AGENDA ITEM NO. - _ _ - - - _ _ SUB ECT ,~': ~~U-~ ~~. ~ ~ 1` - J - - _ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to - recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter = _ _ so that I may comment.WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, = I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE _ - RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES _ _ -_ - - LISTED BELOW. __ • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment c whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will _ decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. c • Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Ques- tions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. • All comments must be directed to the Boazd. Debate between a recognized c speaker and audience members is not allowed. • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. • Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. • INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION __ FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO DEPUTY CLERK - - -_ ,- NAME - ~ (~ i ~ ~ `~ ~ ~ ~ ~' --~ - - _ .P t~ r' ADDRESS ~ ~ ~ r 5 - . - _ PHONE ~' ~ LOS ~ U ~S~ m~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~j~~~~~~~~~~jjj~~~jj~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~j~~~~~~j~~~~.j~~~~jj~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~j~~~~~~~~~jj~~~~~j~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~j~j~~j~jj~~ APPEARANCE RE VEST _ Q _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ AGENDA ITEM NO. 1°2 r o .~~ ~~~ ~ SUBJECT ~'T oN ~ F ~~~ ~z T' boo o u~~-~.~ F©~2 ~- S ~~'c-~ ~L Lx c~P~ P~~~ii I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supex~tisors to recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM so that I ma comment. I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW. • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. • Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Ques- tions of cl ' 'cation may be entertained by the Chairman. • All comments must be directed to the Boazd. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. • Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. • INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FQR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. E PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO DEPUTY CLERK "c _ PLEAS __ NAME ~d,~~9-C~- ~ . ~'j C/°ff~'~'s~ n/ ._ __ . c ADDRESS ~~ ~/ ~ai2t's 7 ~' R ~~ S ~ ~ - PHONE '~ `~ ~- ~ ~ ~ ~ . fi~~iw~~iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiitiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii~iiiii~ PETITION The undersigned, being residents and property owners in the area near 3306 Brambleton Avenue, SW, do hereby indicate our support of the request of Robert Woodward to permit the sale of automobiles on the above property in conjunction with the service station and car wash situate on the property. / ,~/ ~-- NAME: ' ADpR SS:~~/ r G.-- NAMEa; ~,>~ ADDRE; yNAME: / l / ~-~... / ~'t_ ' NAME ADBT~~S~. < ;,, ~ /yl . ,~ ,-~ i''~_. ADDRESS: z z ~, ,;~~ d'>>' ~ ,. NAME: C ~^~-- a ...a,-..ter pia-. ~ z ,~ 1,~.~ a F~~ix NAME: NAME: A/~/JD `~~ir~,~f ~`~. ADDRESS: ~ ~-~` NAME: W(`~~tY~~~.~~~fy1 ~~ ~-,~r~rv ~~.a'y~~ °~F:~'~~'K ~' ~ / NAME: ~ sly' NAME: !y'r' / Sm it~c' l~~',~?`"~ ~% r~isr-` ADDRESS: ~ ~,r~`;4/ADDRESS: 3 / ~ ~ t~t~~~ ~" ~,~',¢,~' NAME:~~ NAME: ~~~'''.~ ~. ~ Ut _ADDRESS: =; ~ ~ __ v ~Sk), ADDRESS: 3:~. _3 ~ ~~..n.-, ~' "~, ` c ( . l L NAME• 'ty ,~~, ~.L L: ": L ~~ NAME: `~,1 ~ G~ ~ ~/~~..~- ADDRESS;...: ~ a ~ _~,~, 5:~J2~DDRE ~ :. 3I~'),s~I.~~°.,~ /.~~,~_~'a.ti ~~ti. NAME:_`~t .~' NAME: AYtcr~-~~;, ~~..~~~ , C ~~'~_ < ~~''° ~ ADDRESS.. ` `~, ,¢~ . ~~k ~~-~ ADDRESS: - ~. c~-c pct.en3.i PETITION The undersigned, being residents and property owners in the area near 3306 Brambleton Avenue, SW, do hereby indicate our support of the request of Robert Woodward to ern the servi st 'on NAME? AD S: / ~4~D ' ~ NAME: ~ ~ /Y- ,9 ADDRESS: ~ t~ ~ NAME: ~. /~. ADDRESS•.~~ fir, NAME: _ '.~ t the sale of automobiles on the above property in conjunction with wash situate on the property. w ~ A n~~~~ ~ti ~~ ~,-s,~~~ I~~~l A . 3~lC~5 Y ~''`~ NAME: ADDRE .11 ~ NAME:~,rz.E ~a ~N~,e:~ s ~~Z~~Q qU~ , DRESS:a~a~ ~o~lawe 1~ ~~ ~... _ NAME: `- ~-- ,est ~n~ DRESS• V l \~2~~~' NAME. G.- NAME: /}'IU.~~ ~:~-~' ADDRESS j~S~ /lit.~~~ ~ NAME: ~ /' _ C(~~,; r' ADDRES ~ %~ ~ ~ ~ ,~ w„ ~~: 5 `,,,~ '~' ~~ NAME: ~`~ . ~, ~. ti~:~~~ ADDRESS: ~-L:b ~=-~br ~ `~ `~, l~ ~.. ~- _-~~<~, ~~. c ..~ ~~_. ? , , ~' ~~ ir" _ NAME: ~ ~ "~' ADDRESS: .~ ~~ , ~~ .r'!~~~ %'~^ ,;-~,:. NAME: ADDRESS: NAME: ADDRESS: NAME: ADDRESS: NAME: ADDRESS: NAME: ADDRESS: NAME: ADDRESS: pet.en3.i PETITION The undersigned, being residents and property owners in the area near 3306 Brambleton Avenue, SW, do hereby indicate our support of the request of Robert Woodward to permit the sale of automobiles on the above property in conjunction with NAME: ~/?~xti~ NAME: ~~.~~~~~~~~~ ~+/~-~-~~-,-- ~~;~ ADDRESS: zo3 ADDRESS• ~-~ ~ j- ~~;;:.~,~ ~~~- - ~.~ ~/ ~ ` l the service station and car wash situate on the property. NAME: ~~ ~,~ ADDRE :~~~^~~ -i .~ .~ NAME: ~ ~ C _~ ADDRES ~c~ _ .~ . U~~~~~~ . ~~/ fr' NAME: ~. ~5 ~57'E~7~~? ADDRESS: 71 ~t~~+~mYref~ F ~ NAME: ~l~w~ ~_-: NAME: _ ~_ J ADDRE . NAME: .~~`' `- ,: ~~ ADDR ~~~, T-- NAME: ~ ADDRESS: ~ ~~_i, ~~Q~ S~' C S~-~ NAME ~ ~ ~~~ c.~ ADDRESS: ,~ ~ "- pet.en3.i NAME: ' ~ ~' (__~ _ ADDRESS: "~. `~~~_ -- ; ~~ 5~ NAME: r ~ ~~~~~ ~/!/~l ,G ADDRESS. Srl~~ ~ ~~.s~ ~.~ , NAME: ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~. ADDRESS: ~ (o~.~ I __ -~ _ _ _- ~ -- - 0 l ___ NAME: t N D1- ~ ~s~`f c~t- ADD ESS: o ~,~,.~ 1 ,~ ~~ ~ ~ J /h, ~r NAME: ~, , ~i'~,Lrl /~ ADDRESS: a ~:~ NAME: ~ ~ ~: -~ ADDRE~ ~~ ~ -- RLn.c.WC 1 -~V~C. NAME: ,C~ ~Q,~"~ K/ ~ Q ~. , ~~_ ADDRESS:~~,~,-G,,,,,.~ 1,~ ~ NAME: ~ rJ ADDRESS: " ~ ~' ~-~ ~' FRA ~ oo~ WIILETTA F~ 9L.. a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ; t ~ ~~ .~P \ GdRj7 MIL N N EET • i _~us~~.. ~ ~ 2~ N J • _~AR_ ._ ~~i -- . E 9B • <~Ne ~ EV.k~ H URN '?~ ,~ ~ ~5se~~' ~. }. ` ~JEfFER K ... ~ / P ., AP S 0~_ ~ S ~ ~ \ W ~ 0 ~~i ~~~ ~ ~ ~~TS 3 ~aTTT ~~ ~~ MT. ro ~ ^aG ~ ' ~ `'' 419 ~' , ~ i ~~~ ex a .. ~ - n w Lewooo -ROA ~ r F S ~~,,µ,,(/ ~ cP7 ~ ~~ ~ vQ `. rraz 3 ES ~ `' ,£uew+ ~ !f ~~ ~ is ~ ~ "!mot ~ \~ vs z• ~ Y C c C '-'gip ~ ~ 'p`~`' `~Y \ ': ,/ a10` '1 '~aawr 1 ~ o~~~~~'P;~ ~~ < `°' ~ VICINITY MAP ~,;~ a ~s- ~ 4P `n~_;aE \c /~ ~Y NORTS so lost: . i, G ~'o / , 5 F~ftWpOd ~ a \y\ ie ~ ' 30 ~ 31 u ~ '° w ~ ~'~ 3g y°- '~ - ~ ,. ro A 27 7 & ~ s 36 a ' S ~i ~ ~ / • a > 28 " u ,.. ~ f ~ ,~,~ / 26 4 ~ ~ • ro 8 I 3 2T , a X20 ~H ~, .rp r 'P, N ~~ / / \ 2 - 3 ~ Bs , • ,. 25 , ~~82 /~ T B2 / 5 4 ~ I ~ ~: 21 / /~ ~~ ~ B2 J~, ~ B2 24 ~2 \ / ~ ° ( B1 ,• B2, ~ s ~-~' B 4 ~ ~ ~ "1 '~.dr 7 23 ~ • • ~ a B1 A • 14 R' ~~ e : \ 13 12 ,~` 83 35 S • . 31 B2 8 ; ~~ ~ / Me s Ae Y' ~B~ I ~ \ ~~ B2 ~ ~ ~g2 ~ ' •~ ~B2• E 1112 a 18\ 2 3T , . ~ 28 B7 ~s62 / X17 ~ \ tom, ~ ~ ~ B2• ~ 13• ' ~ 2 ~ I ~.• 62 N 39 ~ - " 2 ~ -_ • °~ ~ ! ~ .,, 24 B2 . ,. ~' °aa ~ ~ 62 a, 2 vo .: I ---- ,~~ ra, •, 16 ~ . r '~ B 2 • a / ~ ~ `• K ~ ~ - - - $ - '23 , 9 ' ZI B ,~ ,i '~1 ~ 3 2 ~ ~ 12 . is ~ B2' Q - - • - ~Z4 , '~ 1 4 ~ ~ ~y • ~ • g I ~ 16 p ~, 3 _-43_-y N B2• 9_ ' ~ 12 ~ ~ M ~ 2!!- ~ ]i - - - - ~ N •„ it I 1I 17 B2 ~ ' ~ . ~ ' ` , ~ ~ ~-•~ '~ 4 ---- ~. NOTE ., ~• I ALL PARCELS ON THIS "' ab ` , y r , p 2a. ~~, N~ ARE ZONED R1 , UNL 24' _ .~'~ :~'~. e,,., 9' ~ _~ OTHERWISE INDICATED. COMMUNITY SERVICES ~ , ~ ~_ AND DEVELOPMENT S?~:;IA~ ~:,.,~~TIO.;: ~;S~u CA?S ~~' ~'<:~~~ ~---- °` -~ ~ Pages tie, t.li~~ undersigned resi~?ents of T,i.nd~~rr:~rood and Crofton subdivisions • un~7erstand rezoning petitions have 1-,een received by Roanoke County from Mr. v1. E. Cuudiff to rezone portions of land on featherP,oad to pern~it t1~e construction of apartments and a golf course and on lIardy Road to ~;ermit the construction of townhouses. Although the Roanoke County 'Planning Department has recoiranended their at~proval, we are opposed to these rezonings and respectfully ask the Board of Supervisors to decline Mr. Cundiff's requests. Name 1 . 2 3 ~QE~ 20 ~, 22 2? 24 ?.5 Homeowner Address es No 11 ,~ ~ ~~~'~~ ~i9 ~ ,~ 7r~~~ e%~~ ~` ~ ~- a~~ ~~~- 0~7 ~ c ~ V ~ ~ ~ /~' ~ ~.J 1~4 , -Z 5C~ ~: / ~_J~ 1 ., - ~ ~~ ~4 - ,, ~ _~ ~~ ` - _- p 14 ~~rk ~? `~:~ ~ rage ~~__ of ~ pages j~1e, t:he undcrsigner7 residents of T inderna~~cd and Croftor. subdivisions, understand rezoning petitions have l:~en received by Roanoke County from Mr. W. E. Ccndiff to rezone portions of land on Feather Road to permit tl?e construction of apartments and a golf course '•-and on Hardy road to pPrrnit the construction of townhouses. Although the Roanoke County Planning 1:~epartment has reconQnended their approval, we are opposed to these rezonings and respectfully ask the Board of Supervisors to decline Mr. Cundiff's requests. Name ~:~~'~I 1. 1G l7 1 f3 19 20 21 22 23 Address No i 1 ~ ~~s ~" 1 ~ 19 , , Q . ti ~ ~ c~ ~ _~ ~ ~~,,~ s...x,c-zL.1L,~.~v __"~ ~ L 4 .c..c~a.c, ---1~rL 1~--,-~ .~ ¢n~ _ ~~~ ~ ~~ 24 25 6/ t~ ~- - / --- - -L---- C~ ' ~,c~ ~~/. v v '~:' .- nags ~ -- of .r `~" pales iVTE3, t}le L1rrG('t`:3:~~,1t:: !'. rF/SICiP_lltS OC T ln~7erl~d::>C~~~ 3r1ri CrOr`Un Sl.i.'1_i1Vi31CnE, llnrierStand re~onin~~ petitions have been received by Roanoke County from Mr. W. E. Currdiff to rezone portions of land on Fe~~ther Road to permit the construction of apartments and a golf course end on hardy Rcad to permit the construction of townhouses. Although the Roanoke County Planning i~epartment has recommended their approval, we are opposed to these rezonings and respectfully ask the Board of Supervisors to decline Mr. Cundiff's requests. Homeowner Name t <,;.; Address -- ~ t/ „- s ~ ~- 3 d~ ~ 6 b`_ ~ ~ ~ 8 -~ ~- ~~ ~ Yes No ~~:, : , . . v ,.. ,,. .,. ~l 12 13 14 15 16 17 yl~ 19 20 21 23 24 25 22 ^a ~ __ of :.~ 7 pages ~ti~e, the undersigned residents of Linden wood and Crofton suYr7ivisions, un~erstand rezoning petitions have bQen received by Roanoke County from Mr. W. E. Cundiff to rezone portions of land on Feather Road to permit the construction of apartments and a golf course and on IYardY Road to permit the construction of townhouses. Although the Roanoke County Planning Department has recommended their approval, we are opposed to these rezonings and respectfully ask the Board of Supervisors to decline Mr. Cundiff's requests. Homeowner Name Address Y~ No - .-. - - 1 3 ~ c / V t,~~~aw ~ ( `~ ~ ~t.-~si-cltz6-~ n V ,.~,~.r~-,,.. V f~~ ~ 7,~L 8 ~,. ~ yam,, ~. e. ~9 ` ~ ~ ~ ~ , ' ,~. ~ ~ ~ ~~. _ ~_ '~':54i ::. yY1~Q' 1 1 -/,L~ 12 / /( cJ 13 ,,` _ ° u^- r .- 15 16 17 is 20 ~/~ ~I~- 21 ~'1 '~.-~ J~ Gi. I Lc.~ ,'L~ _~'~ 2505 ~~curn.~ °~J1t . L~F ~7~ r~ Aso s 1~,tm..e..Py 5 -f-~ a i. ~ y i ~ 9 I~ ~~~~ _ ~ ~ ~. zs~i7~ ~~ 5 ~~'YCQ•~r.Yc~•, ill 2~-1 ~ G .i ~~~ ~~~z~ .~~ - ~~i7~ ~ ,. _ ~ ~ ;. - ~ ~ _ 22 23 U. - C 24 ~i/ G ~`'~~ Zfi S'6 L1 i~E~R E5'r D~ ~V~~~idV 24j ~ li ~~ ~ i l ~ ~~ ~~~~ ~9~~ . ~ ~ v ti~ Page ~ __ of ~ pages ~Je, the undersigned residents cif t,in-lc.~rn•tc-~o~t ~r.~? Crofton suhdi.visions, understand rezoning petitions have been received by Roanoke County from Mr. W. E. Curtdiff to rezone portions of land on Feather Road to permit t11e construction of apartments and a golf course and on Iiardy Road to permit the construction of townhouses. Although the Roanoke County •-1'lanning Department has recommended their approval, we are opposed to these rezonings and respectfully ask the Board of Supervisors to decline Mr. Cundiff's requests. Name ~~~ ~' 3 ~ ~. , (V~hCI~ 4 5 6 7 s 9 io 11 12 13 2 2 2 Homeowner Address ~J/ ~ ~" Yes No ~-.s-may !.9-~- . U~-„-~- ./ ii ~6~f ~~ .~ ~~ _~Z ~°.~~.~` ~rD? ~. ~ v ~ v - '?~~ ~~ a s ,~°.~~~ ~~ ~ ,.,~-.- ~2 ~i,~ ~ ~ 2 5 7`~ _ O~`T /"/~Y ~ C ~ e s ~ // i~ ~~~~ i v _~~ 14 S ~O~l ti ~ . U Page C ' of ~ [_ pages We, the undersigned residents of Lindenwood and Crofton subdivisions, understand rezoning petitions have been received by Roanoke County from Mr. W. E. Cundiff to rezone portions of land on Feather Road to permit the construction of apartments and a golf course °'~nd on Hardy Road to permit the construction of townhouses. Although the Roanoke County Planning Department has recommended their approval, we are opposed to these rezonings and respectfully ask the Board of Supervisors to decline Mr. Cundiff's requests. 1 2 3 Homeowner Yes No ~- ~--- .~;, , . ~.~ ~_-- Name ~ ~ Address LL~f:,, / ~~~/G~ ~/~~~ ~iz~~~~-mod' ~i'' - lJi%I~.~ , 16 ~i a~3sal~~.w~a~,~.~.~,~.~, ~Q 17 - 7~ 2 ~inc..~~o-zt ,~~t ~ .~ti,T~. va . is ~ 4 ~ 9 Gl~hlr'ize ~r/ ~R . I/,~tati Y,~~/ r ~ ~ ~/ 19 c~' ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~' 22 ~ 23 24 25 . - ^, r>age __ o[ '1~ ~ pages .. Ise, the under.r~i~~;ec3 residents of LinrJenwood and Crofton subdivisions, understand rezoning petitions have been received by Roanoke County from Mr. W. E. Cundiff to rezone portions of land on Feather P.oad to permit t3~e construction of apartments and a golf course __and on F3ardy Road to permit the construction of townhouses. Although the Roanoke County r'lanning Department has recommended their approval, we are opposed to these rezonings and respectfully ask the Board of Supervisors to decline rir. Cundiff's requests. Name 1 ~O.Oi1~~,~ ~l,//~ 2 ~~ 3`~l - q a~GaQ 7'l~..l~LQe- 6 7 ~ ~~~~dC B ~ 9 ~,~w10y~.L _ - ,,~,, 31~ 12~ 13~ l~ ~ 1.9 20 zt 22 :»:.- ~, r Homeowner Address Yes No ~%~`''i ~.~ ~ ~1~r ~D ~~77 / ~ ~_ ~3~~~~~~ ~~`~~,Ua ~/ f- b l_~~J oa e 1 k~ o~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~G.I~G~~'~~~ ~~ ~/ ~ /1 / Z~/c 1 ~ ~.l~Yrt~. -._ ._.__.___ ` ~ ~~ 17 .__ ,,~/) i' /' ~ t - ~J '1 / l I I ~ ?. 3 24 15 na~~~ -~----- of "k-'~ pares r,~Te, the undr~rsic~ned T"~"?31'3~'II~.;S of Lin~lonc~.~ooa anal Crofton su~3i_visicns; understand r_c'zoni_na I~etitions have l:~en received by Roarake County from Mr. W. E. Cutidiff to rezone portions of land an Feather Read to permit tlTe construction of apartments and a golf course _and on Hardy Road to permit tl~e construction of townhouses. Although the Roanoke County T'lanTTing T?eparttrx~nt has reco~rrtnenclecl their ap~~roval, we are' opposed to these rezonings and respectfully ask the Board of Supervisors to decline Mr. Cundiff's requests. Name Address ) 02l ~~.~ ~~~,eo~ l~~ ~/~ ~~S a e r U I UITo ~/ Homeowner Yes No v g .o ~L ~..~. '? 13 ~ ~--C pi H E e. 12D ~r~ ~; Tv -~; - - ..: .. ,;,: r, 1 .,. 2134 F~~fh~R ~D l/t~YaN ..~ ~.. 1 I «-v ~ ~ ~~~ ~ `~ t r 14 _ ~C~ --- - _ ~~Ly~~ I ~ - .` /~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ i5 _ _ _ ~j 1 ~ . _ ._ ____ ~~ `" x~ l 9 - ~'' ~~~ ~ _ ..~ ~~~~~ nave ~ 1 _ of i Z pales tie, the undersigned residents of Lin~len~•:c~od and Crofton subdivisions, understand rezoning l;etitions have been received by Roa~~oke County from Mr. W. E. Cundiff to rezone portions of land on Feather Road to permit t;-~e construction of apartments and a golf course and on Fiardy Road to permit the construction of. townhouses. Although the Roanoke County `'Planning Department has recommended their approval, we are oppose~3 to these rezonings and respectfully ask the Board of Supervisors to decline Mr. Cundiff's requests. Homeowner _ Name Address Yes No o~r~s~d as 1 7 ~ y la~x~s i~,-,vlGr~ ,~~y7 ~s3f~ d'~ 1/,;,,~.. 1 %~ ayi ~ 9 - t/ ~: 13 14 15 16 17 1fl l9 20 ~~ 22 23 24 .. v 25 Page /C~ _ of ~= i Pages d [•1e, the tindcrsi7ned resi ~,n~~; of Lindenwood and Crofton subdivisions, understand rezoning }~~titions leave boen received by Roanoke County from Mr. W. E. Ctuidiff to rezone portions of land on Feather P.oad to pr~rmit the construction of apartments and a golf course and on iTardy Road to K~ennit t}-~e construction oP townhouses. Although the Roanoke County '~Plannin~7 Ix~~~ar.tmrnt has recorrQrn~nrhd I:hrir. aP~;roval, we are opposed to these rezonings and respectfully asiz the Board of Supervisors to decline Mr. Cundiff's reques~s. Name 10 11 Homeowner Address Yes No ~~ X ~~~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ w~.t.J ,c.~u i~ ~ / ~ ~. rs~i.~ Yt~!-. g G ` 13RcoKs N ~RF 7~ 24 ~- L/ ~~ L~- v 25 _ '' ~, ,~1 L 2 2 ti ~ f~`L~2~ 23 Page ~~_ of ~~ pages -'~l-mi''`l We, t;he undersigned residents of Lindem,~ood and Crofton subdivisions, understand rezoning petitions have been received by Roanoke County from Mr. W. E. Cuitdiff to rezone portions of land on Feather Road to permit the construction of apartments and a golf course and on Hardy Road to permit the construction of townhouses. Although the Roanoke County Planning lk~partment has recommended their approval, we are opposed to these rezonings and respectfully ask the Board of Supervisors to decline Mr. Cundiff's requests. Homeowner Name Address Yes No 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ll 12 13 14 _ 15 16 17 l8 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Wage ~~_ of ~_ pages v/ TnTe, the under.siynf~d residents of Linden~.,~c~od and Crofton subdivisions, understand rezonir-y i~etitions have Y~een received by Roanoke County from Mr. W. E. Ci~ndiff to rezone portions of land on Feather Road to permit the construction of apartments and a golf course and on IJardy Road to permit the construction of townhouses. Although the Roanoke County Planning Impartment has recoRQnended their approval, we are opposed to these rezonings and respectfully ask the Board of Supervisors to decline Mr. Cundiff's requests. Name 1 2 3 '%''/;? :tom ~fl.ut~i~ ~, /C~~~~ Address i Homeowner Yes No 4 ~2LU ~2./QU ~ ~tl i _~ _._ a S '~ ~i Ala. ~CLiu n n! c>' u~ ~.~ ~~7r~`f G~'V f~ -(.,~~IJ ~ ~ ~ _. . ~ - t ~ - ~~ 3~ l ~ ~so~~~ ~ t/ l~ ~ ~ ' ~ 3~a ~9 p . ,~. ~/.~ ~/ 17 _ ~ o~ ~ Jl • ~~ 1 F3 ~ ~~~~~ ~~. / 1.9 , a 20 ~ 4 ct,.~,~. .e~ ~,~ ~~~.Cex '~ 21 ~~/ ri , ~/u~/irr /~ tic -v . L o~-~ f i a .r~ ,( .~'~~ ~~ ~ /'/~ /I?~ f.''-~~ z , / I ~7 ~ d YL ~3~ 22 23 24 s... 25 ..~ ..,r...• RIYZz Page _~{__ of _"~ pages •~ tae, i:he undersigned residents of Lindenrhood and Crofton subdivisions, understand rezoning petitions have been received by Roar,.oke County from Mr. t~J. E. Cundiff to rezone portions of land on Feather Road to permit the construction of apartments and a golf course and on FIardy Road to permit the construction of townhouses. Although the Roanoke County Planning Department has .recommended their approval, we are opposed to these rezonings and respectfully asic the Board of Supervisors to decline Mr. Cundiff's requests. Address a oya ~~a~t4 IZ1~ ~~ti_ Homeowner Yes No -~- t~- '~ 13 _ n~l~J E~/L I ~ a-- a~~9ry~~i'N w ~,~ /~Cil~-~ '~ +-~ \ / 1 _ ~ 9 1 ~~~~- ~.-~2~.~~ 309 Y~2. v~ 4, / ~ 6 ~~0~ a~ 3~ 7 ~~ ~i~ ~~~ , ~ ~/ ~~~ ate. ~ a~~ ,~~. -- ~~ ~~ / - ~ ~~ 2l. ~~- ~ ~ c.i 22 2 3 C.~i~z~ _ ~ 7~ - U~-~-- vim- 2 37.3 ~ ~,~ 1/a ~ ,~,~ - ~ Page ~~~_ of ~ pages ~y We, the undersigned residents of Lindens~ood and Crofton subdivisions, understand rezoning petitions Piave been received by Roan~l;e County from Mr. W. E. Currdiff to rezone portions of land on Feather Road to permit t~~e construction of apartments and a oc~lf course and on FTardy Road to permit the construction of townhouses. Although the Roanoke County i'lanning Impartment has recommended their approval, we are opposed to these rezonings and respectfully ask the Board of Supervisors to decline Mr. Cundiff's requests. 1 ~ /1Qi/~¢/ ~•.~ 3 / ~ ~ . ~. ~~G.~~Q/ 4 Address n. Homeowner Yes No Z~ti::~, ~ ~~~~_ 5 _ 6 7 8 9 ~~~ 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 na J , ; l~L of =% pages i11(', t !1(? 17nC1('C 1 `J!ln~i l"f"~ L~~(?ritS of Lin'-~~ntd~.u)~~ ~in~ ~ (~rOf !;On SU~d1.V1SlOC1S , UI1~erStand - re..onilu~ E,~~~ti.l;icros have !-fen re(_eived by Roar:(~ke County from Mr. W. E. Cu,ldiff to rezone ~~rtions of" land on Feather Road to permit thf~ construction of apartments and a golf course and on Hardy Road to permit the construction of townhouses. Although the Roanoke County 'Planning Ippartment has recommended their appro,ral, we are opposed to these rezonings and respectfully ask the Board of Supervisors to ~9ecline Mr. Cundiff's requests. Homeowner 1 2 3 4 5 6 t ~ ~~~,. ~ ~.~~~ l 2 Ci.~,r L~ ' t ~~ ~~ 1 1 1 l t 20 21 22 23 24 25 Address T~ o ~~ l '~n/1`a~ 7 ~ VPO,P .c ~ ~ ^ ~ w 7~(l~ 1 -~,~ ,- _ _~ 3- ~ ~ . ~~ ~ ~ p ~ s~ i~~ sip yr- ~ . ~,:~ ~1~ ~"1~ ~ c~ i, ~ ~~; (' :~ r+ P 1 I Yes/ No /. ~- .~ i/ ~_ Name Wage _ of ~ ! pages ~ ~~ ['le, i ~'(? ll[K~E')"S L :~f1G(1 Ct'~tl!Ir'~lts Of ! ! t)~ I^ntdUQ'j i3(ICj I:rOCtOn SUbdiv7.S10C1S ~ i]n~erStand / rezonincl petitions }iavn L~Ern receive-? k;y P.oanrl;~ G~~.mty from Mr. W. E. Cundiff to rezone portions of land on E'eather Road to perrni ±: l-.hr~ construction of apartments` and a golf .course, and on hardy Road to permit the coilstr~:cti;;r~ of totimhouses'~•. Although the Roanoke County Planning Impartment has recommended their approval, we are opposed to these rezonings and respectfully ask the Board of Supervisors to decline Mr. Cundiff's requests. Name 1 [4 Q~~-tic, f ~d'Ziy~k'~ p _ SG', ~ Minn / ~C. :~° ~.,~ ~ lI la 13 14 16 17 lB l9 20 2l 22 24 Address ~ooos~l) TD; i~~ ~ ~ A ~„~ -~ lY ~ G/ n. _ ,L ~ ~ ~ ~ ,~-- ~, g /,Y,~ /v~J ~'l ~'~~ r7s r ~-aa I'~ ~ G eo v P ~/' II v'T ~H~S ~~~ ~ G / ~_ ,~ l///. .~/~ /tGl~liQ ~ ~ `G~/C ' Haneowner Yes No if ~~ . y V ~~ V .. - ~' ~,- ~_ r f/,y l~r~, I,1-~r-~ un<ler~i~~neca residents c~C T,i.u~'r~i~°~,r~~~~~ end CroFton sukxaivi=ions, understand ~ ;~ , r~~zoninry pcr:i.i;ions hive hewn receLVCd by 1?oarx~~lce Cuar.ty from Mr. W. F.. CundiEf to rezone porf;i.ons o;: ).and on ['eather. Road to ~;crrait: y-~:~, r.~xistructi.on of apartments and a golf course .and orZ Fla r a v F,gad Y,o permit the cons ~ r ~ac~ti.r~r, c:~ ~" to:~mhouses . Although the Roanoke County wl~lanniny rk~partment has recommended 1:heir- a~~~~r~~val, we are opposed to these rezonings and r.espectCully ask the Board of Supervisors to decline Mr. Cundiff's requests. _ Name 1 ~o% C' _~ 3 ~~Ci~url 'u ~ _~1~ _ nririracc Homeowner Yes No ~~ l/ v s =~~ io ~l >. ~z ,:~ 1~ l~~ 1? l~ ~o 20 ~' l 22 ~t '1.4 ~ ~.. 3 ,P.2 e - r/ ~ ~~ ~~. -- ~3~ ~f~~~ ~ ~-N~ ~~f~ ~ //~ c~~ ~~__~_ ~ - 2`.i Page _ of ~~ pales ~,~e, the undersigned residents of t,i.ndenc~ood and Crofton subdivisions, understand ~ ~'^ rezoning E>etitions haves been received by Roanoke County from Mr. W. E. Cundiff to rezone ' portions of land on Feather Road to permit tl~.e construction of apartments and a golf course and on hardy Road to permit the construction of townhouses. Although the Roanoke County `~' Planning hepartment has recommended their approval, we are opposed to these rezonings and respectfully ask the Board of Supervisors to decline Mr. Ctutdiff's requests. Name Address ~~~ ~ ~, .3~0 ~r~, ._ ~.. 6 ~ ~~ 3 ~~,;~~~ 7 ~//7 ~ ~~ 8 ~~ Q r~~. m !~ tiC _~!1 ., _ _ .G _, .i~&» ,10 11 12~ 14 15 16 17 l8 19 20 21 22 23 2~ 25 Homeowner Yes No ~_ !/ 13 " n;~,~p !~'•~ of f+.~ cafes t~,'e, F.I~e un~lrrsirxn~~~j rc~sicl~~nts ii.` i,in~lr~n:,~x~~l .rn~l ('roe ton suhc)ivision~!, understand ~ L rezoni.ny ~~etitions Crave lx~en rocF~ived by Roanoke County from qtr. 14- E. CrfttdifE to rezone portions of ].and on Feather Road to pn nnit the construction of apartments and a golf course and on Eiardy Road to permit the construction of townhouses. Although the Roanoke County `''t'lanning );part;rnent has recommended their approval, we are opposed to these rezonings and respectfully aslt the Board of Supervisors to decline Mr. Cundiff's requests. ~~~ t??me Address Homeowner Yes No 1 V~/ 2 3 4 YLL-a'p ~-{ • ~ifc-Ar'v''~ 3 ~ ~- /Lti4S~vt~-~ ~-2 ~-tJ `~ ` ~ ~-•~ ~`D ~r f~ v ~~ ~~ ~~ s g r ,,~ U,,~,,.~~-- L// 2 ~ /yl ~5s ~,~,~- ~.,~ I ,) ~ _ - ~ - ~~ ~ ,~,~---~-~ _ ~ T - V l2 _ ~~ ~ a ~~~ ~ 13 ld 15 16 17 18 19 20 2l 22 - 23 __ 24 25 Wage ~Q of L~ pales ~, [ve, t.t~e undersi.yned residents of T,i.ndcn:rood and Crofton subdivisions, understand f re?oninq E.>etitions have Yx~en received by Roanoke County From Mr. W. E. Cundiff to rezone portions of land on Feather Road to permit tl-~e construction of apartments and a golf course and on Eiar_dy Road to permit the construction of townhouses. Although the Roanoke County "-~'l.anning Department has recommended their approval, we are opposed to these rezonings and respectfully ask the Board of Supervisors to decline Mr. Cundiff's requests. Homeowner / Address Yes No ~/ ~ / ,. V L ~, 2--- ~ ,~ ~ /' ~ 10 11 12 13 14 15 l6 17 18 l9 20 21 22 23 24 25 Wage ~ _ of ~ _~ ^ages Ne, the underrsigned residents of Linden~;ood and Crofton subdivisions, un~3erstand J rezoning ~~etitions have been received by Roanoke County from Mr. W. E. Cundiff to rezone portions of land on Feather P.oad to permit tY;e constnuction of apartments and a golf course and on F~ardy Road to permit the construction of townhouses. Although the Roanoke County `"~~Planning t~epartment has recommended their approval, we are opposed to these rezonings and respectfully ask the Board of Supervisors to decline Mr. Cundiff's requests. Name 1 2 - ~ ~ // ~~ ~ / ,,,, ' T -~-- ,( 5 ~n~ ~ZLa 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 17 18 19 20 Address ~ ~~ T y ~-~ ,, K ~ ~( Homeowner Yes No ~- ` ~, ~ ysa ~~o~d~~lZ. l~ ~~~ G ro -~~ o ~ l~r` //Y1 ~ ) Q (~ y o 6 ct o~ ~~ ~~ 7 (~ 20 ~ ~; D.~ . ~c G~i/ ~ ~~~~dn ~~ _~ ~~~ ~~Frz~i~ ~~ `^`- ~l 7~ .- ~ 22 ~~ "`~ / ~ ~~ - ~-f7 ~ C~~ 23 ~ i -~ 24 `L ~ ~ - rage ~f~-- of ~~ ~ pages [~de, t}1P_ llnd~~CS1Cin~~:1 :~°Sl~-f!?r~l,,; O(~ i~7t1~7~'.rii~C)O~~ dn~~~ ~CO`•tOrl Sil~l`I1S10nS, Un~lerStand rezoning E~:~titions hnvo r~.,~n re~~~~ived by Ro~tric~l;e County from Mr. W. E. Cundiff to rezone portions of land on Feather R.~~id to permit tYx~ construction of apartments and a golf course and on iizr.dy Roarl tc.~ f~rmi_t I:.h~ const-rur.tion c)(• townhouses. Although the Roanoke County Planning Ik~partment; tjas recocrnneixlec.~ their approval, we arc' opposed to these rezonings and ~s" respectfully ask the Board of Supervisors to _decline Mr. Cundiff's requests. Homeowner Address Yes No 3 6 7 8 r 9 i o ,~ .~ s~-~~ _.(.ss ~ . _ . 11 12, - .~~ -~ 1 \~ M i ~S r v+ti F,.~' LEA V c ~Te,v l~ ~~~~..1~~t~..a ~t..~-~ra ~)c 1~,\lN- ~l ~ ~ ~ V I~~ ~/~ ~ ~~ Z.~ ~ ~.~ r~ f t Ante (J r ~o+^~- ~/~ ~ ~~ ~,5 5 i rn e'2, ~-.A-nP U/ iJ-~on l~/~ ~ as ~v~ ~ ~ ~- ~ vw X ~ - ~ - ~ - ~ - ~ - x -~ ~~ {~ i5.S1Mr ~2,~Nr1/1Wfhn1~V ,~' v~3 ~ n~ ~v~, ya 4 5 Wage L. of ~5 pages _ ~ ~~.-rte.-~~~ x-` =", We, the undersigned resident;s of T,indenc•~~od and Crofton sutix3i.visions, understand rezoning ~;etitions haves been received by Roanoke County from Mr. W. E. Cundiff to rezone portion. of land on Feather Road t-o permit the construction of apartments and a golf course and on hardy P.oad to permit the construction of townhouses. Although the Roanoke County '~~~l.anning T~partment has reconRnended their approval, we are opposed to these rezonings and respectfully ask the Board of Supervisors to decline Mr. Cundiff's requests. Homeowner Name Address Yes No 3 ~~ y 'y1ZG~~ ~~ Z~~ Uu ~ 4 ill ~? ~G~ ~(1.t ~)c> ~ ~ ~~_ ~yX ~u-n ~//~ ~,~ , 6 7 _ 8 9 _ 10 ,.:,~ _, al l 12 13 _ 14 _ 15 l6 17 l8 l9 20 2l 22 23 24 • 25 __ ~~`~~ ~ `~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, DECEMBER 18, 1990 DENIAL OF ORDINANCE 121890-10 TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A 1.301 ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED ON FEATHER ROAD ONE-TENTH OF A MILE 80UTH OF ITS INTERSECTION WITH VA 24 (TAX MAP NO. 61.18-2-25) IN THE VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF R-1 TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF R-3 WITH CONDITIONS UPON THE APPLICATION OF W. E. CUNDIFF WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on September 25, 1990, and the second reading and public hearing was held October 23, 1990, and continued to December 18, 1990; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on October 2, 1990; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: Denied on motion of Supervisor Nickens, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Development & Inspections Terry Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning John Willey, Director, Real Estate Assessment M E M O RAN D U M TO: Board of Supervisors From: Janet Scheid, Planning Department ~~ DATE: December 11, 1990 SUBJECT: Community Meeting - East County Rezoning Petitions The Planning Commission has held public hearings on three rezoning petitions for land owned by W.E. Cundiff. The first request, heard on October 2, is to rezone from R-1 to R-E to build a golf course on property that fronts on both Route 24 and Feather Road in East County. The second petition, also heard on October 2, is to rezone from R-1 to R-3 to build an apartment complex on Feather Road. The third petition, continued on October 2 and heard on December 4, is to rezone from R-1 to R-3 to build a townhouse complex on Hardy Road. All three petitions have been favorably recommended to the Board with proffered conditions. On October 23, 1990 the Board continued the golf course and apartment petitions and requested that the petitioners hold a community meeting to answer questions and discuss their plans in more detail with the neighborhood. This meeting was set up by the Planning Department staff and held on December 3 at the Roanoke County Library -Vinton Branch. Approximately 100 people attended. In addition to Planning Department staff, Dr. Nickens attended as did Mr. Kyle Robinson and Mr. Don Witt from the Planning Commission. The biggest area of concern seemed to be the apartment complex proposed for Feather Road near the subdivisions of Lindenwood and Crofton. Comments included the following: 1) Feather Road and Hardy Road are already too congested - do not need any more traffic, 2) Concern that the apartments will be "low-rent" - petitioner assured the neighborhood that this will not be the case and rent will be approximately $350 per month for a one-bedroom unit, 3) Neighbors would rather have townhouses instead of apartments built on Feather Road, 4) Fear that single-family residential property values will decline in areas around the apartments, 5) Concern that parking for the apartment complex is not adequate, 6) Concerns about the safety of the Vinton wells that are on the Vinton side of the golf course, 7) Residents of Crofton are concerned about the visual aesthetics of the APCO easement being moved to their property boundary since Crofton's utilities are underground. ??ETITIONER: W. E. CUNDIFF ~~ ' CASE NUMBER: 28-10/90 / ~ ~~ _ ~/ Planning Commission Hearing Date: October 2, 1990 'T Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: October 23, 1990 A. REQUEST Petition of W. E. Cundiff to rezone 1.301 acres from R-1 to R-3 to construct apartments, located on Feather Road, .1 mile south of its intersection with VA 24, Vinton Magisterial District. B. CITIZEN COMMENTS None. C. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION The Commission asked Mr. Beard if a turnaround area is required, and he replied that Fire and Rescue requires accessibility to the entire site (sufficient turnaround), or additional fire hydrants or building sprinklers. Mr. Witt asked Steve Brown, representing petitioner, if the 24 units being proposed will consist of only one bedroom units. Mr. Brown replied, "yes." D. PROFFERED CONDITIONS 1) There will be no more than 24 units built on the property. 2) Parking area light poles and fixtures not to exceed 10 feet in height. 3) Building heights not to exceed 25 feet above grade. 4) Installation of type B, option 2, screening and buffering along the north and south borders. E. COMMISSION ACTION(S) Mr. Robinson said that he would be abstaining from discussion and voting on the petition due to a conflict of interest. Mr. Gordon moved to approve the petition with proffered conditions. Mr. Witt said that with the initial density of 32 units, he was reluctant to consider the project; however, since petitioner has proffered 24 units he will support the motion. Mr. Massey agreed. The motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Witt, Massey, Gordon NAYS: Winstead ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: Robinson F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE Mr. Winstead said he was troubled with this kind of density in a Development area without a proffered site plan or those other elements which would permit evaluation of design criteria--as stated in the Comprehensive Plan. G. ATTACHMENTS: ' Concept Plan ~~Vicinity Map i~ Staff $~~aort ~ Other Terrance rri~ on, Secretary Roanoke ounty Planning Commission 1 BTAFF REPORT ~~' CASE NOMHER: 28-10/90 REVIEWED BY: TIM BEARD PETITIONER: W. E. CONDIFF DATE: OCTOBER 2, 1990 Petition of W. E. Cundiff to rezone 1.301 acres from R-1 to R-3 to construct apartments, located on Feather Road, .l mile south of its intersection with Washington Avenue, Vinton Magisterial District. NATORE OF REOIIEST a. Unconditional request to construct two multifamily structures two stories in height; one containing 12 units and one containing 20 units, totaling 32 units. b. Concept plan and zoning vicinity map describe project more fully. APPLICABLE REGOLATIONB a. R-3 District uses include. a variety of residential and a limited number of institutional uses. Petitioner has made no proffers related to this request. The proposed site is a 1.3 acre portion of the northeast corner of an existing 17.39 acre parcel. b. Site plan review will- be required to ensure compliance with County regulations. c. VDOT commercial entrance permit will be required. SITE CHARACTERIBTICB TOPOGRAPHY: Site slopes gently downhill from east to west. Wolf Creek tributary parallels the proposed tract's northern border. GROOND COVER: Field grass; scattered deciduous trees and shrubs. Scrap lumber and rubbish rests on the northern reaches of the site resulting from a recent barn dismantling. AREA CHARACTERIBTICB FOTORE GROWTH PRIORITY: Situated within the Vinton Community Planning Area. Designated as a stable growth area; currently receiving urban services. GENERAL AREA is developed with single family residential uses. Considerable undeveloped pasture/open space remains. LAND IISE IMPACT ASSE88MENT Rating: Rate each factor according to the impact of the proposed action. Use a scale of 1 through 5. 1 = positive impact, 2 = negligible impact, 3 = manageable impact, 4 = disruptive impact, 5 = severe impact, and N/A = not applicable. RATING FACTOR COMMENTS LAND OBE COMPATIBILITY 4 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: 1985 Comprehensive Development Plan has placed this area within a Development land use category. i~, 4~~ - ~ This designation does not specifically address very high density residential (greater than 24 units per acre). Given a density of 12- 24 units per acre is discouraged with low compatibility, it follows that a density exceeding 24 units per acre would be strongly discouraged or prohibited with no compatibility. Further, a density of this magnitude cannot be supported considering the very low density of nearby residential tracts. The validity of the existing Development designation is supported by the established land use determinants as follows: 1) Public facilities capacity. Adequate public facilities exist to handle increased population concentrations (within the bounds of Development category land use types--clustered multifamily residential at 6-12 units per acre on 3+ acre tracts of land). 2) Water and sewer availability. Water and sewer services are in place serving an existing urban residential density ranging from less than one unit per acre to approximately 3 units per acre in the Feather Road area. 3) Environmental capacity. Natural land features provide only limited opportunity for residential development due to proximity to Wolf Creek and its floodplain. 4) Major street access. Proposed site has direct access to Feather Road. 5) Urban sector. Proposed site lies within urban service limits. ~ SURROUNDING LAND: Heavily traveled secondary highway, single family residential, floodplain and open field. ~ NEIGHBORING AREA: Heavily traveled primary and secondary highways, single family residential, floodplain, park and open space, office and retail commercial. ~ SITE LAYOUT: Concept plan complies with basic site design criteria as specified by Section 21-22-4, R-3 multifamily residential zoning. Deficiencies exist regarding public street/parking design standards and screening and buffering. ~ ARCHITECTURE: Presently undetermined; no rendering submitted. ~ SCREENING AND LANDSCAPING: Per ordinance. Concept plan does not indicate the required evergreen shrubs along Feather Road border (in addition to the required deciduous trees which are indicated) nor does it show Type B screening and buffering required on the south boundary. Additionally, given the existing and proposed use west of this site, petitioner is requested to provide Type B screening and buffering along the west and north borders (see suggested proffers). 3 AMENITIES: Concept plan indicates minimum number of parking spaces, adequate travel lane width, and handicap spaces per ordinance. Width of individual spaces may require further increase. See fire protection and rescue for emergency vehicle access comments. ~ NATURAL AMBNITI88: Parcel features gentle downslope from east to west terminating at a natural drainageway leading to Wolf Creek. ~a 90_ ~~. TRAFFIC 3 ~ BTREET CAPACITIES: 1986 ADT on .3 mile of Feather Road from Washing- ton Avenue to Dawnridge Drive: 3,152 vehicles. 1987 accident rate: One for this same segment of road. Anticipated additional ADT of 195 vehicle trip ends per day. ~ CIRCOLATION: Proposed 'entrance requires widening from 24 feet to 30 feet. VDOT has not commented on sight distance, which appears adequate turning north onto Feather Road. OTILITIEB ~ WATER: Adequate source and distribution (existing 8-inch line in Feather Road). ~ BEWER: Adequate treatment and transmission (existing sewer parallels Wolf Creek) . DRAINAGE 3 BASIN: Wolf Creek. On-site stormwater detention will be enforced as a part of the formal plan review process. ~ FLOODPLAIN: Not located within FEMA flood hazard zone. However, if proposed structures are found to lie within the floodplain of a drainage area exceeding 100 acres, the owner will be required to floodproof such structures and/or obtain flood insurance. PIIBLIC SERVICEB 4 FIRE PROTECTION: Within established service standard (travel time). Anticipate insufficient interior turnaround area for emergency vehicles. 4 REgCpE: Within established service standard (4 minutes or less travel time). Anticipate insufficient interior turnaround area for emergency vehicles. 3 PARRS AND RECREATION: No on-site recreation facilities proposed. 2 SCHOOLS: If 32 one-bedroom garden apartments are built, not more than one school age resident would be anticipated according to regional demographic multipliers for common configurations of standard housing types. Of area schools, William Byrd High is near capacity. Estimated cost of educating one child per year of $4,740 of which $2,317.80 is locally funded. TAR BASE T A LAND AND IMPROV8K8~TT VALIIE: Estimated $300,000 TABABLE GRO88 8ALB8/YEAR: N/A TOTAL EMPLOYE88: Nane TOTAL REVENQE TO'1'IIS COIINTY/YEAR: Approximately $3,390 New revenue: Approximately $2,825 ~. 2 AIR: 2 WATER: 2 SOILS: ENVIRONMENT f ~c~-/d-~ 4 2 NOISE: 2 SIGNAGE: None specified. Residential district limits are 1/4 sq.ft. per lineal foot of road frontage. PLAN CONSISTENCY This area is designated as Development. Petitioner's request is consistent with policies D-1 (manage new residential growth according to capacity and availability of such public facilities as water, sewer, streets and schools) and D-9 (provide direct access to a collector rather than a local street where a project significantly increases density from a surrounding neighborhood. Petitioner's request is inconsistent with policy D-7 (provide adequate centers of parks and recreation facilities that benefit new residents). Consistency with policies D-2 (encourage innovation in residential land development and building design) and D-8 (permit multifamily development where exceptional housing design and site planning techniques are used to achieve compatibility) is undetermined using the information provided thus far. STAFF EVALIIATION 8TRENGTHS: 1) Proposal is consistent with policies D-1 and D-9. WEAKNESSES: 1) Very high density residential uses are strongly discouraged or prohibited in development areas. 2) Unconditional nature of proposal. 3) Inadequate turnaround area is proposed for emergency vehicles. PROFFERS SIIGGESTED: 1) Installation of Type B, option 2, screening and buffering along north, south and west borders (east border/Feather Road screening per ordinance). 2) Parking area light poles and fixtures not to exceed 10 feet in height. 3) Building heights (top of roof) not to exceed 23 feet above grade. IG. E. CUNDIFF R E A L E STATE B U I L D E R D E V E L O P E R 118 South Pollard Street • Dial 344-5585 VINTON, VIRGINIA 24179 '~ October 4, 1990 Mr. Tim Beard Roanoke County Planning Department P.0. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 Re: Case Number 28-10/90 Rezoning Request for Apartments Dear Mr. Beard: We respectfully submit the following proffers for the above mentioned case as discussed with the County Planning Staff and the Planning Board Commissioners: (1) There will be no more than 24 units built on the property. (2) Parking area light poles and fixtures will not exceed 10 feet in height. (3) Building heights (top of roof) will not exceed 25 feet in height. (4) Installation of type B, option ~ screening and buffering along the north and south borders. Sincerely, W.E d' f ~a9o-j~ C~~OK` VAII~~ hp t u .... r ~, ,o W.E. Cundiff Company ~~ ~ ~~~~ ~~~ l~ 1 ` ..,.~ ~~J ...-.. h .. ~a~Q! ~ ~ ~ ~ ., ; ti ;.t mod;.? t. ate •_ ~ . ~ ~ ~ =~-I~- u. ~ ~ _ . ~,1, -~ .t ~- , -+~~ 1 _ ~, 1. '-~ ' ' ' I P' _~ _ ~ . i ~ {i iM ` ~ ' , .I ~ / 7 ------ ' 1 ~ 1~ f ~ 1 ~ ~`a~~ ' ~ -yl~~/~/ ~~~ _ , ' --- ~~ ~ I ~ i~ ~ :~ :f ' Z i ~ • ~ ~, , f Q ` ~f~' ~ ~ ~ ~1' ,, , ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ iI 1 ~ II ~• } .;h j ~ ~\ ~, ~ ~ ;, l ;- ---- J ~, - l., ., ;~ ~ ~ ~T ~ % ~ I ~ j ; ~ ! ; _ _ jj ~ ~ ~ , , ~ , I ~ , /. ' ~ , r ~ ~ ~ , `_ i . U i / ' ' ~ `5T j ` `~ ~ j -' . . , • , ~ , ~.~. ' ~ ~ / ~ , :~ ~: j ;~ ;~ i ~ . , ' i a.' ~ ~ ~~F ~ tt ~ • . ~~ ~ t .:~ ., .~ 1 ~ / J ~ ~ ~ /+ / ` / ,~ rte. ~. lago- NORTH ~ ~ ~ Yl ~~ _ . ~- t ~ r+ „ .• M7 • V ~ r .:. • III r I ~ Y ~~ • .~~~ ..-. ~ A• • V Y1Y .. 111 M ~. / ' i • _,_ ~ ~ ~ ~.t J. ~ • .3. ~ ~ . . . . . . . 1 i ` • ` S ~ / • / 7~ • .j. ~~ • ` • ~ , • ~ / • • ~ ~ ~` •` • ` • • I'~ f' I M~M \ • ' !• ` `. . ~ * . •, ~ • '* ~ • ~ O+ ' 1~+ ~ \ S •' '• '- • .• ~ • i • '' ~ ~ . .~ • ~ ° '- . T •' . * ~ ' . • 4 •• - • - ^' yy~ ~ w • w• ~~ • ~ • ~ • ~ • - • 3 4 •~ ~ R f ~ ~ •- • ~ i~•i f 7. + • • * ~ _ • 1 •~ ~~ ~.1r • ~ 1 ~ ' ~ ~' T ~ \ ..~.... .. '. , ~„ 'P/lRCtis ARE - - - '- M . ~.. 1 uN~ess ZoNl~7 ~ ~ • ~ , orN~uv~c~sE Nor~v. ~\ ,, . ~ ~~ ~ `, . ~i ~; ~ ~LtNITYSERVICBS ~a. E. CUNDIFF ~YBLOPMENT R-1 t o R- 3 J a la9o-~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, DECEMBER 18, 1990 ORDINANCE TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A 1.301 ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED ON FEATHER ROAD ONE-TENTH OF A MILE SOUTH OF ITS INTERSECTION WITH VA 24 (TAX MAP NO. 61.18-2-25) IN THE VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF R-1 TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF R-3 WITH CONDITIONS UPON THE APPLICATION OF W. E. CUNDIFF WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on September 25, 1990, and the second reading and public hearing was held October 23, 1990, and continued to December 18, 1990; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on October 2, 1990; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing 1.301 acre, as described herein, and located on Feather Road one-tenth of a mile south of its intersection with VA 24, (Tax Map Number 61.18-2-25) in the Vinton Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of R-1, Single Family Residential District, to the zoning classification of R-3, Multi-Family Residential District. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of W. E. Cundiff. 3. That the owner has voluntarily proffered in writing the following conditions which the Board of Supervisors hereby accepts: 1 R ia9o-~ a) There will be no more than 24 units built on the property. b) Parking area light poles and fixtures not to exceed 10 feet in height. c) Building heights not to exceed 25 feet above grade. d) Installation of type B, option 2, screening and buffering along the north and south borders. 4. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: BEGINNING at an iron pin on the western right-of-way line of State Secondary Route 654, said pin being 266 feet from the intersection of same with the southern right-of- way line of State Route 24; thence, with the western right-of-way line of State Secondary Route 654, S. 45° 46' 55" E. for a distance of 16.81' to an iron pin; thence, with same S. 35° 29' 56" E. for a distance of 105.68' to an iron pin; thence, with same S. 31° 39' 49" E. for a distance of 221.36' to an iron pin; thence, S. 58° 20' 11" W. for a distance of 120.00' to an iron pin; thence, N. 43° 03' 43" W. for a distance of 90.03' to an iron pin; thence, N. 26 ° 14' 00" W. for a distance of 370.00' to an iron pin; thence, S. 82° 12' 47" E. for a distance of 35.39' to an iron pin; thence, N. 73 ° 28' 23" E. for a distance of 21.02' to an iron pin; thence, N. 44° 55' 35" E. for a distance of 45.33' to an iron pin; thence, N. 49° 43' 22" E. for a distance of 20.80' to an iron pin; containing 1.301 acre, more or less; being further designated as Tax Map No. 61.18-2-25. TOGETHER with and subject to covenants, easements, and restrictions of record. 5. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. 2 ~IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIiIIIIIIIIIiIIIiIIIIiII~IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIiIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIiIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII111J ~ 4 ~ ~ d r N ~ - ~ - ~ ~ ~ - - ~ - - APPEARANCE REQUEST - - - - _ _ _ - - - - AGENDA ITEM NO. 1 ~ _ - _ __ - - _ SUBJECT ~~~ /3 ~r~ 2 ~ ~ ~~ - - - - _ _ - I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so that I may comment.WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE - = RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES =_ - LISTED BELOW. __ • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment _ = whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will = decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Boazd #o c do otherwise. __ • Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Ques- bons of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. c • All comments must be directed to the Boazd. Debate between a recognized c speaker and audience members is not allowed. =_ • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. • Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments = with the clerk. - • INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED = GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION =_ FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT c THEM. c - PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO DEPUTY CLERK - _ __ - _ _ - ~~ z ~ -E' NAME ~o ~~~ - - = ADDRESS a~fl l~ ~.~ ~-~- ~~~ ~~ ~ ~ >~ - = - - = PHONE ~~~ - ~ 5 7 / mllilllllllilllllllllllllllllllllllll 111 ll l l l llllllllllllllll llllllllllllllllllllllllllilillillllllllllllllillllllllllllllll 11111 l~Ililllll~~~llll~lllllll~l~~~~~~~~~i~~lllllllllllllillll~l~Il~l~~Eil~llllllillillllllllllllllilllll~lll~~~~~ll~~~~~~~~~~~~lli~ll~! _ - _ - _ _ - - - - _ _ APPEARANCE RE UEST _ Q _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ y ~ ~ =_ AGENDA ITEM NO. ~' ,~j ° ~~ -~ ` ~'' =_ - - _ , ~ 1 _ a~ , ,i~ C i-^' ~ ~.~,-. (.~'~~ _= SUBJECT ~~ r ~ ~-~- ~ __ ~ ~ / ~~ ~/ ~ = I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supex~tisors to recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter so that I ma comment.WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE c RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES __ LISTED BELOW. • Each speaker will be iven between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. c c • S Bakers will be limited to a resentation of their oint of view onl . Ques- c P P P Y _ tions of cl ' 'cation may be entertained by the Chairman. c • All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. _ • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. • Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. _ c • INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FOR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. __ __ PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO DEPUTY CLERK _ - 1I I I I I I1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111~ Wllllllllllllilllllllllllliiiiiilllllllillilillllllillll~llllllEiilllllllllllllilllliillllllllllliililllillllillllillililllllllll _ _ 4_ = APPEARANCE REQUEST S ~ a~o_ y - 190- s AGENDA ITEM NO. ~ a ~ o -- ~ SUBJECT ~ ~2=~q -vrE -tom ~ F n NE I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supex~isors to recognize me during the public hearin on the above matter - so that I ma comment.WHEN CALLS TO THE PODIUM, = I WILL GI E MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES = LISTED BELOW. c • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will c decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to - do otherwise. _ • Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Ques- tions of cl ' 'cation may be entertained by the Chairman. __ • All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. • Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. • INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FQR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. _ - PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO DEPUTY CLERK _ fiiiiiiiiiii~iiiiiii~iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiitiiii~iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii~iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii~~~iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii~~~ ~, ~, ~ 4 ... ~. r ~~ _ ... _.~ . ...~ ~~ s ~.~ _ _~ _ _~ APPEARANCE REQUEST ~~ =~ _ _~ _ _~ _ _~ _ _~ _ _~ _ -~ _ -~ _ .~ AGENDA ITEM NO. ~~ ~, ~~ , ~ ,, ' ~~ %~' , '> ~ ~~ ~~ ~ =_ _ .~ -_ _ ~ ~ ~d. ~ ~ ~~~ SUBJECT - , -~ . r r -~ ~_ --~ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supex~isors to recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter = WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM, so that I ma comment. I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES __ LISTED BELOW. __ c • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will c decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. • S eakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Ques- P bons of cl ' 'cation may be entertained by the Chairman. • All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized c speaker and audience members is not allowed. • Both s eakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. p - • Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments =_ with the clerk. • INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FQR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. __ c PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO DEPUTY CLERK NAME ~ ~-.~ . ._ • • • • • ADDRESS ~7/.~ ~ ~~ ~,~ ~~ T~'c~ ~ j?~- _ PHONE S ~~ ' 1~~ miiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii~iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiitiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii~i~ ~illlllllllilllllilllliillllllllllllllillillllllilllllllllIlll~Illllllllllllllillllillllllllllililllllllilllllliilillllllllllll~j~„ __ _ _ ~. _ ~ _ _ APPEAR,A~NCE REQUEST _ _ _ ~, _ _ -_ AGENDA ITEM NO. ! ''^~~ ~ ~~ ~° _ ~_ - ~' ~ 1 SUBJEC'T' ~4r ~ ~'~,~, .a ~ % `~ -, _ _ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supex~tisors to recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter n WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM _ so that I ma comme t. _ I WILL GI~E MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW. __ _ • E h s esker will be iven between three to five minutes to comment ac P - whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. • Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Ques- bons of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. • All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. • Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. • INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FQR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. E PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO DEPUTY CLERK _ PLEAS _ _ ~. NAME ~ ~ " `l I / ~ ~; t>~t_,! r-- _ __ _ ,_ _ ADDRESS ~ ~ ~ ~ ~'~~_~ ((~f~--":Z =_ = i - PHONE ~~ ~~ ~J ~ L~ C~ Z~ -_ - ~~illilllillllilllllllllllllillllilllllllllllllllliilillllilllllllllllllllllllllilllllllllillilillllllllllllillilllllllilllllllit~ ~~'~ ` J AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, DECEMBER 18, 1990 ORDINANCE 121890-11 TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A 12.3 ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED ALONG WOLF CREEK BETWEEN HARDY ROAD AND VIRGINIA 24 (A PORTION OF TAX MAP NOS. 61.18-2-26 AND 61.18-2-25) IN THE VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF R-1 TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF R-E WITH CONDITIONS IIPON THE APPLICATION OF STEVE BROWN WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on September 25, 1990, and the second reading and public hearing was held October 23, 1990, and continued to December 18, 1990; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on October 2, 1990; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing 12.3 acres, as described herein, and located along Wolf Creek between Hardy Road and Virginia Route 24, (a portion of Tax Map Numbers 61-18-2-26 and 61.18-2-25) in the Vinton Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of R-1, Single Family Residential District, to the zoning classification of R-E, Residential Estate District. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of Steve Brown. 3. That the owner has voluntarily proffered in writing the 1 following conditions which the Board of Supervisors hereby accepts: a) The property will be used only for golf course and golf related activities. b) A filter strip, 50 feet centered on the creeks, will be maintained along the two creeks traversing the property and no fertilizers, pesticides, or toxic chemicals will be applied within this filter strip. Along Wolf Creek, a 25 foot filter strip will be maintained as above on the Roanoke County side of the creek. c) There will be no lighting of the golf course. 4 . That said real estate is more fully described as follows Parcel 1 A certain tract or parcel of land located in the Vinton Magisterial District, Roanoke County, Virginia, being a portion of Tax Map No. 61.18-2-26 and being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at a point located N. 76° 18' 03" W. 544.79' from an iron pin on the western right-of-way line of Feather Road (State Route 654), said iron pin being located approximately 1870 feet south of the southern right-of-way line of State Route 24; thence, S. 63° 14' 00" W. for a distance of 768.70' to a point; thence, N. 07° 22' 48" E. for a distance of 501.93' to a point; thence, S. 76° 18' 03" E. for a distance of 640.07' to a point, said point being the Point of Beginning, containing 3.665 acres, more or less. TOGETHER with and subject to covenants, easements, and restrictions of record. Parcel 2 A certain tract or parcel of land located in the Vinton Magisterial District, Roanoke County, Virginia, being a portion of Tax Map No. 61.18-2-25 and being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at an iron pin on the western right-of-way line of Feather Road (State Route 654 - variable width right- 2 of-way), said iron pin being located approximately 700 feet south of State Route 24; thence, with said right- of-way line S. 31° 30' 49" E. for a distance of 33.00' to a point; thence, continuing with same, S. 25° 59' S5" E. for a distance of 56.81' to a point; thence, leaving Feather Road, S. 37° 32' 14" W. for a distance of 547.56' to a point; thence, N. 76° 18' 03" W. for a distance of 33.32'; thence, S. 07° 22' 48" W. for a distance of 501.93' to a point; thence, S. 63° 14' 00" W. for a distance of 191.75' to a point; thence, S. 40° 18' 25" W. for a distance of 220.66' to a point; thence, N. 77° 22' 27" W. for a distance of 111.00' to a point, said point being the northwest corner of Tax Parcel 68.18-2- 15.1; thence, N. 22° 10' 16" W. for a distance of 82.69' to a point in the center of Wolf Creek; thence, with Wolf Creek the following twenty eight (28) courses: N. 30° 06' 15" E. 41.67' to a point; thence, N. 07° 30' 36" W. 32.72' to a point; thence, N. 33° 31' 54" E. 73.96' to a point; thence, N. 64° 46' 28" E. 123.67' to a point; thence, N. 30° 01' 05" E. 84.52' to a point; thence, S. 85° 50' 33" E. 71.33' to a point; thence, N. 57° 06' 42" E. 45.68' to a point; thence, N. 45° 46' S8" W. 41.16' to a point; thence, N. 34° 56' 53" E. 66.46' to a point; thence, N. 07° 31' 34" E. 53.84' to a point; thence, N. 09 ° 27' 26" E. 100.03' to a point; thence, N. 40 ° 41' 21" E. 49.81' to a point; thence, N. 08° 11' 01" W. 118.83' to a point; thence, N. 26° 25' 40" E. 96.10 to a point; thence, N. 16° 31' 25" W. 40.13' to a point; thence, N. 45° 29' 53" E. 100.61' to a point; thence, N. 10° 20' 07" W. 52.23' to a point; thence, N. 18° 06' 21" E. 68.66' to a point; thence, N. 60° 04' 04" E. 89.16' to a point; thence, N. 05° 36' 11" W. 63.24' to a point; thence, N. 69° 55' 16" W. 46.83' to a point; thence, N. 31° 26' 26" W. 83.49' to a point; thence, N. 42° 06' 17" W. 133.73' to a point; thence, S. 74° 12' 19" W. 67.18' to a point; thence, N. 35° 38' 32" W. 62.45' to a point; thence, N. 29° 07' S3" E. 34.79' to a point; thence, N. 76° 27' 54" W. 75.90' to a point; thence, N. 57° 08' 03" W. 65.62' to a point; thence, leaving Wolf Creek, N. 01° 00' 46" W. for a distance of 70.27' to a point; thence, N. 84° 35' 03" E. for a distance of 352.61' to an iron pin, said pin marking the northwest corner of a 1.301 acre parcel; thence, with said parcel S. 26° 14' 00" E. for a distance of 370.00' to an iron pin; thence, S. 43° 03' 43" E. for a distanct of 90.03' to an iron pin; thence, N. 58° 20' 11" E. for a distance of 120.00' to an iron pin, being the Point of Beginning, containing 8.740 acres, more or less. TOGETHER with and subject to covenants, easements, and restrictions of record. 3 5. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: ~~~-~• Mary H. A len, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Development & Inspections Terry Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning John Willey, Director, Real Estate Assessment 4 PETITIONER: STEVE BROWN ~/'~'"' CASE NUMBER: 29-10/90 ~~ ~,jo _ ~' Planning Commission Hearing Date: October 2, 1990 !! Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: October 23, 1990 A. REQUEST Petition of Steve Brown to rezone 12.3 acres from R-1 to R-E to construct a golf course, located along Wolf Creek between Hardy Road and VA 24, Vinton Magisterial District. B. CITIZEN COMMENTS Arthur LaRoche expressed concern with contamination of surface and groundwater by improper use of herbicides and pesticides. C. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION In response to the Commission, Ms. Donihe described a filter strip as an area of land where no fertilizers, pesticides or other potentially toxic chemicals will be used. Any contaminants in runoff from adjoining properties would theoretically be filtered out before reaching the water. When asked if that portion of the site located in Vinton is properly zoned, Mr. Brown presented a letter from the Town of Vinton which states that the property in Vinton is properly zoned. The letter also states that any herbicide, etc. proposed must be presented to the Town for analysis to assure that any potential threat to Wolf Creek or the groundwater sources is documented. D. PROFFERED CONDITIONS 1) The property will be used only for golf course and golf related activities. 2) A filter strip, 50 feet centered on the creeks will be maintained along the two creeks traversing the property and no fertilizers, pesticides, or toxic chemicals will be applied within this filter strip. Along Wolf Creek, a 25 foot filter strip will be maintained as above on the Roanoke County side of the creek. 3) There will be no lighting of the golf course. E. COMMISSION ACTION(S) Mr. Robinson said that he would be abstaining from discussion and voting on the petition due to a conflict of interest. Mr. Witt moved to approve the petition with proffered conditions. The motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Witt, Massey, Winstead, Gordon NAYS: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: Robinson F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE None. G. ATTACHMENTS: 4f Concept Plan Vicinity Map i~Staff Report Other Terrance rringto Secretary Roanoke ounty Pl nning Commission _ /a ~~ -S STAFF REPORT ,~ CASE NUMBER: 29-10/90 REVIEWED BY: Lynn Donihe PETITIONER: Steve Brown DATE: October 2, 1990 Petition of Steve Brown to rezone 12.3 acres from R-1 to RE to construct a golf course, located along Wolf Creek between Hardy Road and VA Route 24, Vinton Magisterial District. NATURE OF REQUEST a. Unconditional request to rezone 12.3 acres between Hardy Road, Washington Avenue (Rt. 24), and Feather Road in order to construct a portion of a 9-hole golf course. Four holes or portions thereof are shown on the concept plan to be located within Roanoke County and the remaining holes to be located in the Town of Vinton. b. Concept plan and vicinity map describe project further. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS a. The RE (Residential Estates) District permits Country Clubs and other public and private noncommercial recreation areas and facilities such as golf courses, riding academies and swimming pools. Petitioner has indicated that proposed golf course will not be a private membership course, but rather a public course with no memberships; use may not be considered as a country club. Other uses permitted in the RE district that are not permitted in the R-1 district include agricultural (except commercial feeding of livestock or fowl, the keeping of swine, or the sale of any products at retail or wholesale), nursery schools and day care centers, hospital (with special exception). b. Site plan review will be required in order to ensure compliance with County development regulations. c. A portion of the property is located within a designated FEMA floodplain. Golf courses are permitted uses within the floodway provided that they do not require structures, fill, or storage of materials and equipment. All uses, activities, and development occuring within any floodplain area shall be undertaken only upon the issuance of a zoning permit. Prior to the issuance of any such permit, the Zoning Administrator shall require all applications to include compliance with all applicable state and federal laws, including approval of -the State Water Control Board. d. Commercial entrance permit must be obtained from VDOT. SITE CHARACTERISTICS TOPOGRAPHY: Moderately sloping down to creeks. GROIIND COVER: Most of site is non-forested. Forest vegetation is limited to along Wolf Creek and a small creek that bisects the southern half of the site. Remainder of site is covered with dense growth of grass, weeds, and shrubs. AREA CHARACTERISTICS FUTURE GROWTH PRIORITY: Situated within the Vinton Community Planning Area. Designated as a stable growth area. Urban services are available. /~ ~ ~~ GENERAL AREA is developed with single family dwellings and subdivisions, heavily traveled primary and secondary streets, commercial sites - both developed and undeveloped, recreational and park uses. LAND USE IMPACT ASSESSMENT Rating: Rate each factor according to the impact of the proposed action. Use a scale of 1 through 5. 1 = positive impact, 2 = negligible impact, 3 = manageable impact, 4 = disruptive impact, 5 = severe impact, and N/A = not applicable. RATING FACTOR COMN~ENTS LAND USE COMPATIBILITY 3 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: 1985 Comprehensive Development Plan has placed a portion of this area within a Neighborhood Conservation land use designation and a portion within a Development land use designation. The Plan discourages outdoor recreation uses in the Neighborhood Conservation areas (except for neighborhood-oriented parks) and encourages outdoor recreation uses in the Development areas. Neither of the two land use designations offer development policies for outdoor recreation. However, the Plan does recognize that river, stream, and floodplain areas are suitable for parks and may be suitable for other limited recreation uses. The Plan encourages protection of these areas in order to preserve water quality and quantity (both surface and ground water) , preserve natural vegetation and wildlife as important elements in a balanced ecological system, serve aesthetic purposes, and provide community amenities. The Plan discourages the use of fertilizers, pesticides, and other potentially toxic materials near surface waters and encourages the use of filter strips (50 to 100 feet in width) surrounding all surface waters. 3 SURROUNDING LAND: Developed areas with single-family lots and subdivisions, some undeveloped areas, and a swim club. Undeveloped commercial parcels adjoin the site to the north. 3 NEIGHBORING AREA: Heavily traveled primary and secondary roads with commercial sites. See also "Surrounding land." -• 3 SITE LAYOUT: Concept plan indicates use of an existing building for the cart shop and club house. The building does not. appear to conform with the current RE district regulations -- any expansion of this building will require, and a change in use of the building may require, that the building be brought into conformance with the Zoning Ordinance. Parking is shown between the clubhouse and Feather Road -- aesthetics of the site from the public road and adjacent residential properties may be enhanced if clubhouse, rather than parking, is prominent to the street front. Also, petitioner has not indicated to what extent grading and filling will be required in order to accomodate a golf course. 2 ARCHITECTURE: Petitioner has not submitted elevations for proposed clubhouse. 3 SCREENING AND LANDSCAPING: Per ordinance. No screening or landscaping plans offered by petitioner. 3 AMENITIES: Parking shown on concept is not adequate for a nine-hole golf course. The use is not listed in the parking standards; required parking is determined by the Zoning Administrator and will be addressed through site plan review. Petitioner has not suggested 1~~~.~, ~.,.<.,) lighting plan for golf course nor indicated hours of operation. "Club house" as shown on the concept plan has not been defined by petitioner in terms of use -- may only include uses customarily incidental to a golf course. 3 NATURAL AMENITIES: Vegetation along the creeks should be retained as Best Management Practices to protect water quality -- with the exception of a few tall poplars along the creek running from near Downridge Drive to Wolf Creek. These should be removed for safety reasons: they are tall, top-heavy, shallow rooted, and are candidates for windthrow in a severe storm. TRAFFIC 3 STREET CAPACITIES: 1986 ADT for Feather Road from Washington Avenue to Downridge Road was 3152. ITE calculates additional trip ends resulting from the project according to the acreage of the golf course (sample used was very small and included Country clubs and public courses). Concept plan does not indicate total acreage for the golf course, but staff estimates approximately 35 acres (as shown on Roanoke County tax maps) in the project. Estimated 290 trip ends per day. 3 CIRCULATION: Access to the golf course and club house is shown off of Feather Road. Limited on-site circulation is indicated, with golfers' vehicles entering directly into a parking lot. Access to club house and cart shop appears to be shared with golfers' entrance, although petitioner has not addressed this. DTILITIES 2 WATER: Town of Vinton 2 SEWER: -Town of Vinton DRAINAGE 3 .BASIN: Wolf Creek. 4 FLOODPLAIN: Portion of site is located within designated FEMA floodplain. See "Applicable Regulations" for more discussion. PUBLIC SERVICES 2 FIRE PROTECTION: Within established service standard. Water and access requirements will be taken into consideration at site plan review. 2 RESCUE: See "Fire Protection" 1 PARKS AND RECREATION: While the proposed golf course would not contribute to the County's park and recreational facility needs as established by the State, the project would provide additional recreational facilities in the Vinton planning area. N/A SCHOOLS: TAX BASE 2 LAND AND IIKPROVEI~NT VALOE: $200,000 TAXABLE GROSS SALES/YEAR: TOTAL Ei~LOYEES: TOTAL REVENUE TO THE COUNTY/YEAR: N/A ~~ ~~ ENVIRONMENT .P ~~ 2 AIR: 3 WATER: Potential for contamination of Wolf Creek and surrounding wells from fertilizers, pesticides, and other chemicals and materials used in golf course maintenance. 3 SOUS: See "Water" 2 NOISE: 2 SIGNAGE: Per Section 21-93 of Zoning Ordinance. The RE district permits a maximum of 0.25 square feet per 1 linear foot of lot frontage. No freestanding signs are permitted on any lot having less than two hundred (200) feet of lot frontage. PLAN CONSISTENCY This area is designated as both Neighborhood Conservation and Development. The proposed use is encouraged in Development areas but discouraged with low compatibility in Neighborhood Conservation areas. Petitioner's application does not provide enough information to evaluate the consistency of the project with other applicable sections of the Comprehensive Plan. STAFF EVALUATION STRENGTHS: (1) Outdoor recreation is encouraged in Development land use areas. (2) Limited recreational uses are sometimes suitable in floodplain areas. (3) Project would provide additional recreational facilities in the Vinton area of the County. WEAIQdESSES: (1) Outdoor recreation is discouraged in Neighborhood Conservation land use areas. (2) Petitioner has not indicated proposed uses within the club house. (3) Petitioner has not addressed the floodway/floodplain issues adequately. (4) Potential for direct and indirect contamination of Wolf Creek and Roanoke River. PROFFERS SUGGESTED: (1) A filter strip of natural vegetation, a minimum of 50 feet in width, will be maintained along the three creeks traversing the property. No fertilizers, pesticides, or other potentially toxic chemicals or materials shall be applied within this filter strip. (2) Golf course and accessory uses are the only permitted uses on this site. ~~~~~ ,~~.~,,. W. E. CUNDIFF R E A L E STATE B U I L D E R D E V E L O P E R 118 South Pollard Street • Dial 344-5585 VINTON, VIRGINIA 24179 REALTOR October 4, 1990 Ms. Lynn Donihe Roanoke County Planning Department P.0. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 Re: Case Number: 29-10/90 Rezoning Request for Golf Course Dear Ms. Donihe: We respectfully submit the following proffers for the above mentioned case as discussed with the County Planning Staff and the Planning Board Commissioners: o'~OKS VAl[(r N ; • ~, ,o `~~IS ASS~~`', (1) The property will be used only for golf and ~//~ golf related activities . ~~i{,,,ri'~ C~+~""" (2) A filter s~r,~i~p~ of 50 feet~lwill be maintained along the-fie creeks transuersing the property and no fertilizers, pesticides, or toxic chemicals will be ap ied within this filter stri (3) There will be no lighting of the golf course. ~~~~ ~~ ~~,~~ ~ ~~, Sincerely, W.E f W.E. Cundiff Company L ~~ ~ i l ~ . ~e~~` .q~E~l~~~g~; ~ • ~~r~~4~~RCJ~ t ~t t,V r ~99f q~1 ~jppQ ~ ~ ~ •r• r. ~ ` `r ~g ,~~ ~ ti ~I~y~~ ~~~ ~t ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~• ~ o ~ ~ ^' ~ ~ // 0' *~ ~ \ ! +/ ~ ~~~ '~ ~~ E o t~ e v {~ e ., l~ ~~~,,~ c~ r ~~ F;~ u ~ ' Ir ! E ~= , r '' ~ ~ V J ~ ~ » ~~ 4 ~ ~ ~ ~~ .~ .. ~.. J ~. p ` -'~ ~ t ~ y N o j' ~ ti~ ~! 1 y ~---~ ,~y~ - ~n r . -- ~, ur , o o ; ~ ~ o ~•s • d ~ ~ ~+ ~ f ~ • f~ , _ ~ ~ r ~ '` w ; r i ~ e 4~ ~ '~ f ` , ~ ,r ` ~ ! , / ,` 1r ,` • k ~ ~ ~ ti ~ ~ r ~' O a _ e i' • / ~ I ~ -. ~ a , ~lMN ~ - x* ~~ 4 t . '- ~~~ ~~fP ~ ~~ ~~ 1 t ~~, ~i~ ~ ~ ~~ O ~~ ~~ , i~~ e w ~ ~ ~ ~ c ~ ~ // _ ~~1 i6~~i ~ _1~,~ l~ / >< ~ ' t a 1 V ~~ ~ 2 a !{ ~ ~ ~ (r~~ ~ i~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~Jn~ y ~~ w . ,`` !~~ ~; ~ ~ ~ o r ? v e Y _. _ _ . _. - A ° ~ r ~ • i ~,- r`' ~_ ., _. b /~ ~~ -~ . 1, -. -~~ ~~ ~~r a.' a ~~ s.~ ', ~ /~,; ~- _. • ~' ~ •• • •.. . • ~, .s • .. ~ • r •~ ~• ~ • ~' *• ' • ~ • ~ • • • • • • • r ~ .r 7 f ' ~ • " - ~ xoNEb 1Z~ t u Nt.E~9s . ;,, , , • ~ ~ .~... • • ~ • , ~ o-ra~w~sE No-r~v. .~ C ~~ • ~ .... C0~[~INITY SERVICES STEVE BROWN AN~DSVELOPMENT R-1 to RE ..,~.... ~ NORTH J M1 .... r~ M , • • "'t fit' ~ + .l. • ~ ~ S., r-~~ •~ ~ •. \ • ~ • ,.L ----- ~ ~ i• • ~~ \ ~, /~ • • • • • r, ' • .• • O • ! ~ ~ ~~ • • • ~ r ~ • •• , • ~ ~` '~• • * ~ ~, .M . ~ • • •. ~ • i • ~ .i ~' '• • • . - • s ` ~ ~ • , •~ / • - 0 ~ ,, e ~ • •• ~ • .* - - _ ~1 ,-- -' _ _ ~ _.~ .. ~ ~ • ,v + ' ' Y J ~~ ~~ . ~ rr t y ~ O 1 • ~ ~ / Y ~ ..: /ayo-s AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, DECEMBER 18, 1990 ORDINANCE TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A 12.3 ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED ALONG WOLF CREEK BETWEEN HARDY ROAD AND VIRGINIA 24 (A PORTION OF TAX MAP NOS. 61.18- 2-26 AND 61.18-2-25) IN THE VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF R-1 TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF R-E WITH CONDITIONS UPON THE APPLICATION OF BTEVE BROWN WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on September 25, 1990, and the second reading and public hearing was held October 23, 1990, and continued to December 18, 1990; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on October 2, 1990; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing 12.3 acres, as described herein, and located along Wolf Creek between Hardy Road and Virginia Route 24, (a portion of Tax Map Numbers 61-18-2-26 and 61.18-2-25) in the Vinton Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of R-1, Single Family Residential District, to the zoning classification of R-E, Residential Estate District. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of Steve Brown. 3. That the owner has voluntarily proffered in writing the following conditions which the Board of Supervisors hereby accepts: 1 f~~'~-~ a) The property will be used only for golf course and golf related activities. b) A filter strip, 50 feet centered on the creeks, will be maintained along the two creeks traversing the property and no fertilizers, pesticides, or toxic chemicals will be applied within this filter strip. Along Wolf Creek, a 25 foot filter strip will be maintained as above on the Roanoke County side of the creek. c) There will be no lighting of the golf course. 4. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: Parcel 1 A certain tract or parcel of land located in the Vinton Magisterial District, Roanoke County, Virginia, being a portion of Tax Map No. 61.18-2-26 and being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at a point located N. 76° 18' 03" W. 544.79' from an iron pin on the western right-of-way line of Feather Road (State Route 654), said iron pin being located approximately 1870 feet south of the southern right-of-way line of State Route 24; thence, S. 63° 14' 00" W. for a distance of 768.70' to a point; thence, N. 07° 22' 48" E. for a distance of 501.93' to a point; thence, S. 76° 18' 03" E. for a distance of 640.07' to a point, said point being the Point of Beginning, containing 3.665 acres, more or less. TOGETHER with and subject to covenants, easements, and restrictions of record. Parcel 2 A certain tract or parcel of land located in the Vinton Magisterial District, Roanoke County, Virginia, being a portion of Tax Map No. 61.18-2-25 and being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at an iron pin on the western right-of-way line of Feather Road (State Route 654 - variable width right- of-way), said iron pin being located approximately 700 feet south of State Route 24 ; thence, with said right-of- 2 ~a~4" way line S. 31° 30' 49" E. for a distance of 33.00' to a point; thence, continuing with same, S. 25° 59' 55" E. for a distance of 56.81' to a point; thence, leaving Feather Road, S. 37° 32' 14" W. for a distance of 547.56' to a point; thence, N. 76° 18' 03" W. for a distance of 33.32'; thence, S. 07° 22' 48" W. for a distance of 501.93' to a point; thence, S. 63° 14' 00" W. for a distance of 191.75' to a point; thence, S. 40° 18' 25" W. for a distance of 220.66' to a point; thence, N. 77° 22' 27" W. for a distance of 111.00' to a point, said point being the northwest corner of Tax Parcel 68.18-2-15.1; thence, N. 22° 10' 16" W, for a distance of 82.69' to a point in the center of Wolf Creek; thence, with Wolf Creek the following twenty eight (28) courses: N. 30° 06' 15" E. 41.67' to a point; thence, N. 07° 30' 36" W. 32.72' to a point; thence, N. 33° 31' 54" E. 73.96' to a point; thence, N. 64° 46' 28" E. 123.67' to a point; thence, N. 30° 01' 05" E. 84.52' to a point; thence, S. 85° 50' 33" E. 71.33' to a point; thence, N. 57° 06' 42" E. 45.68' to a point; thence, N. 45° 46' 58" W. 41.16' to a point; thence, N. 34 ° 56' 53" E. 66.46' to a point; thence, N. 07° 31' 34" E. 53.84' to a point; thence, N. 09 ° 27' 26" E. 100.03' to a point; thence, N. 40 ° 41' 21" E. 49.81' to a point; thence, N. 08° 11' 01" W. 118.83' to a point; thence, N. 26° 25' 40" E. 96.10 to a point; thence, N. 16° 31' 25" W. 40.13' to a point; thence, N. 45 ° 29' S3" E. 100.61' to a point; thence, N. 10 ° 20' 07" W. 52.23' to a point; thence, N. 18° 06' 21" E. 68.66' to a point; thence, N. 60° 04' 04" E. 89.16' to a point; thence, N. 05° 36' 11" W. 63.24' to a point; thence, N. 69° 55' 16" W. 46.83' to a point; thence, N. 31° 26' 26" W. 83.49' to a point; thence, N. 42° 06' 17" W. 133.73' to a point; thence, S. 74° 12' 19" W. 67.18' to a point; thence, N. 35° 38' 32" W. 62.45' to a point; thence, N. 29° 07' 53" E. 34.79' to a point; thence, N. 76° 27' S4" W. 75.90' to a point; thence, N. 57° 08' 03" W. 65.62' to a point; thence, leaving Wolf Creek, N. O1° 00' 46" W. for a distance of 70.27' to a point; thence, N. 84° 35' 03" E. for a distance of 352.61' to an iron pin, said pin marking the northwest corner of a 1.301 acre parcel; thence, with said parcel S. 26° 14' 00" E. for a distance of 370.00' to an iron pin; thence, S. 43° 03' 43" E. for a distanct of 90.03' to an iron pin; thence, N. 58° 20' 11" E. for a distance of 120.00' to an iron pin, being the Point of Beginning, containing 8.740 acres, more or less. TOGETHER with and subject to covenants, easements, and restrictions of record. 5. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect 3 _~ ~' thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. 4 , CORRECTED TAX MAP NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, DECEMBER 18, 1990 ORDINANCE 121890-12 TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A 7.8 ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED ON HARDY ROAD (ROUTE 634) NEAR WOLF CREEK (A PORTION OF TAX MAP NO. 61.18-2- 25 AND ALL OF TAX MAP NO. 61.18-2-25.1) IN THE VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF R-1 TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF R-3 UPON THE APPLICATION OF STEVE BROWN WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on September 25, 1990, and the second reading and public hearing was held December 18, 1990; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on December 4, 1990; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing 7.8 acre, as described herein, and located on Hardy Road (Route 634) near Wolf Creek, (a portion of Tax Map Number 61.18-2-25 and all of Tax Map No. 61.18-2-25.1) in the Vinton Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of R-l, Single Family Residential District, to the zoning classification of R-3, Multi-Family Residential District. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of Steve Brown. 3. That the owner has voluntarily proffered in writing the following conditions which the Board of Supervisors hereby accepts: a. The height limitation of any structure shall not exceed 35 feet. b. Use of the property shall be restricted only to the construction of not more than 32 townhouse units, and related site improvements associated with townhouse developments. c. Screening and buffering shall comply with requirements of Section 21-92 of the zoning ordinance, as amended. Credit shall be considered for trees and vegetation remaining after construction which meet the intent and purposes of the ordinance requirements. d. Streets serving the townhouse units shall be designed and constructed to VDOT standards and upon completion shall be dedicated to the state highway system for ownership and maintenance. 4. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: A certain tract or parcel of land (a portion of Tax Map No. 61.18-2-25) lying and being in the Vinton Magisterial District, Roanoke County, Virginia, and being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at an iron rod, laid road being S. 77 deg. 22 min. 27 sec. E. 111.00 feet from the northwest corner of Tax Parcel 61.18-2-25.1; thence, N. 40 deg. 18 min. 25 sec. E. for a distance of 220.66 feet to a point; thence, S. 48 deg. 21 min. 29 sec. E. for a distance of 140.00 feet to a point; thence along a proposed road with a curve to the left having a radius of 271.80 feet and an arc length of 158.63 feet, being subtended by a chord of S. 48 deg. 00 min. 48 sec. W. for a distance of 156.39 feet to a point; thence, N. 77 deg. 22 min. 27 sec. W. for a distance of 134.37 feet to the Point of Beginning; together with and subject to covenants, easements, and restrictions of record; said property containing 0.524 acres, more or less. A certain tract or parcel of land (Tax Map No. 61.18-2- 25.1) located on Hardy Road (State Route 634) in the Vinton Magisterial District, Roanoke County, Virginia, approximately 70 feet southeast of Wolfe Creek and the Town of Vinton Corporate Line and being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING on a point on tine northern right-of-way line of Hardy Road (State Route 634 - variable width right- of-way); thence, N. 47 deg. 34 min 32 sec. E. for a distance of 427.83 feet to an iron pin; thence, N. 10 deg. 51 min. 48 sec. W. for a distance of 199.86 feet to an iron pin; thence, N. 17 deg. 52 min. 40 sec. W. for a distance of 259.62 feet to an iron pin; thence, S. 77 deg. 22 min. 27 sec. E. for a distance of 390.81 feet to an iron pin; thence, S. 05 deg. 13 min. 40 sec. W. for a distance of 948.84 feet to an iron pin on the northern right-of-way line of State Route 634 (variable width right-of-way); thence, S. 62 deg. 30 min. 10 sec. W. for a distance of 34.62 feet to a point; thence, N. 58 deg. 18 min. 32 sec. W. for a distance of 88.56 feet to a point; thence, N. 58 deg. 39 min. 30 sec. W. for a distance of 49.75 feet to a point; thence, N. 58 deg. 02 min. 30 sec. W. for a distance of 149.34 feet to a point; thence, along a curve to the right having a radius of 5704.58 feet and an arc length of 199.13 feet, being subtended by a chord of N. 57 deg. 02 min. 30 sec. W. for a distance of 199.12 feet to a point; thence, N. 42 deg. 19 min. 20 sec. W. for a distance of 15.23 feet to a point; thence N. 43 deg. 16 min. 43 sec. W. for a distance of 59.46 feet to a point, said point being the POINT OF BEGINNING; together with and subject to covenants, easements, and restrictions of record; said property contains 7.296 acres, more or less. 5. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: 7l'~~.-~-y- ~ p ,~ Mary H. A len, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Development & Inspections Terry Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning John Willey, Director, Real Estate Assessment AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, DECEMBER 18, 1990 ORDINANCE 121890-12 TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A 7.8 ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED ON HARDY ROAD (ROUTE 634) NEAR WOLF CREEK (A PORTION OF TAX MAP NO. 62.18-2- 25 AND ALL OF TAX MAP NO. 61.18-2-25.1) IN THE VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF R-1 TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF R-3 IIPON THE APPLICATION OF STEVE BROWN WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on September 25, 1990, and the second reading and public hearing was held December 18, 1990; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on December 4, 1990; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing 7.8 acre, as described herein, and located on Hardy Road (Route 634) near Wolf Creek, (a portion of Tax Map Number 62.18-2-25 and all of Tax Map No. 61.18-2-25.1) in the Vinton Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of R-l, Single Family Residential District, to the zoning classification of R-3, Multi-Family Residential District. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of Steve Brown. 3. That the owner has voluntarily proffered in writing the following conditions which the Board of Supervisors hereby accepts: a. The height limitation of any structure shall not exceed 35 feet. b. Use of the property shall be restricted only to the construction of not more than 32 townhouse units, and related site improvements associated with townhouse developments. c. Screening and buffering shall comply with requirements of Section 21-92 of the zoning ordinance, as amended. Credit shall be considered for trees and vegetation remaining after construction which meet the intent and purposes of the ordinance requirements. d. Streets serving the townhouse units shall be designed and constructed to VDOT standards and upon completion shall be dedicated to the state highway system for ownership and maintenance. 4. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: A certain tract or parcel of land (a portion of Tax Map No. 62.18-2-25) lying and being in the Vinton Magisterial District, Roanoke County, Virginia, and being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at an iron rod, said road being S. 77 deg. 22 min. 27 sec. E. 111.00 feet from the northwest corner of Tax Parcel 61.18-2-25.1; thence, N. 40 deg. 18 min. 25 sec. E. for a distance of 220.66 feet to a point; thence, S. 48 deg. 21 min. 29 sec. E. for a distance of 140.00 feet to a point; thence along a proposed road with a curve to the left having a radius of 271.80 feet and an arc length of 158.63 feet, being subtended by a chord of S. 48 deg. 00 min. 48 sec. W. for a distance of 156.39 feet to a point; thence, N. 77 deg. 22 min. 27 sec. W. for a distance of 134.37 feet to the Point of Beginning; together with and subject to covenants, easements, and restrictions of record; said property containing 0.524 acres, more or less. A certain tract or parcel of land (Tax Map No. 61.18-2- 25.1) located on Hardy Road (State Route 634) in the Vinton Magisterial District, Roanoke County, Virginia, approximately 70 feet southeast of Wolfe Creek and the Town of Vinton Corporate Line and being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING on a point on the northern right-of-way line of Hardy Road (State Route 634 - variable width right- of-way); thence, N. 47 deg. 34 min 32 sec. E. for a distance of 427.83 feet to an iron pin; thence, N. 10 deg. 51 min. 48 sec. W. for a distance of 199.86 feet to an iron pin; thence, N. 17 deg. 52 min. 40 sec. W. for a distance of 259.62 feet to an iron pin; thence, S. 77 deg. 22 min. 27 sec. E. for a distance of 390.81 feet to an iron pin; thence, S. 05 deg. 13 min. 40 sec. W. for a distance of 948.84 feet to an iron pin on the northern right-of-way line of State Route 634 (variable width right-of-way); thence, S. 62 deg. 30 min. 10 sec. W. for a distance of 34.62 feet to a point; thence, N. 58 deg. 18 min. 32 sec. W. for a distance of 88.56 feet to a point; thence, N. 58 deg. 39 min. 30 sec. W. for a distance of 49.75 feet to a point; thence, N. 58 deg. 02 min. 30 sec. W. for a distance of 149.34 feet to a point; thence, along a curve to the right having a radius of 5704.58 feet and an arc length of 199.13 feet, being subtended by a chord of N. 57 deg. 02 min. 30 sec. W. for a distance of 199.12 feet to a point; thence, N. 42 deg. 19 min. 20 sec. W. for a distance of 15.23 feet to a point; thence N. 43 deg. 16 min. 43 sec. W. for a distance of 59.46 feet to a point, said point being the POINT OF BEGINNING; together with and subject to covenants, easements, and restrictions of record; said property contains 7.296 acres, more or less. 5. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Development & Inspections Terry Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning John Willey, Director, Real Estate Assessment ~~ PETITIONER: STEVE BROWN ~~ASE NUMBER: 30-10/90 ~ ,~ ~ ~ Planning Commission Hearing Date: December 4, 1990 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: December 18 , 1990 ~~~-~ <~'~5, ~ ~ '' ~, A. REQUEST (CONT. FROM OCT. 2) Petition of Steve Brown to rezone 7.8 acres from R-1 to R-3 to construct townhouses, located on Hardy Road near Wolf Creek, Vinton Magisterial District. B. CITIZEN COMMENTS Buddy Patterson expressed concern with the APCO power lines because the power lines in his neighborhood are all underground. Norma Ruble voiced concern with the increase in traffic on Feather Road if the townhouse road is connected to Feather Road, as was shown on a plan presented at a community meeting. Brady Allman said the proposal would create additional traffic on Hardy Road. C. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION Mr. Witt addressed some of the citizens' concerns by saying: unfortunately VDOT typically does not make needed road improvements until the traffic situation has gotten intolerable; if the site were to be developed with single-family homes, the power lines may still have to be moved. D. PROFFERED CONDITIONS 1) The height limitations of any structure shall not exceed 35 feet. 2) Use of the property shall be restricted only to the construction of not more than 32 townhouse units, and related site improvements associated with townhouse developments. 3) Screening and buffering shall comply with requirements of Section 21-92 of the zoning ordinance, as amended. Credit shall be considered for trees and vegetation remaining after construction which meet the intent and purposes of the ordinance requirements. 4) Streets serving the townhouse units shall be designed and constructed to VDOT standards, and upon completion shall be dedicated to the state highway system for ownership and maintenance. E. COMMISSION ACTION(S) Mr. Robinson stated that he would be abstaining from discussion and voting on the petition due to a conflict of interest. Mr. Witt moved to approved the petition with proffered conditions. The motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Massey, Winstead, Witt, Gordon NAYS: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: Robinson F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE None. G. ATTACHMENTS: ~ Concept Plan ~ Vicinity Map Staff Report Other Terrance rringt Secretary Roanoke unty anning Commission M E M O R A N D U M TO: Planning Commission FROM: .Anita McMillian and Jon Hartley DATE: November 30, 1990 RE: Petition of Steve Brown to rezone 7.8 acres from R-1 to R-3 to construct townhouses. Since the staff report was prepared for the October public hearing, the petitioner has submitted a revised concept plan (See attachment "A"). This concept plan reflects three major changes. 1. The APCO easement which bisected the site has been relocated along the eastern boundary of the property adjacent to Crofton subdivision. The proposed width would also be reduced to 30 feet, subject to approval of APCO. 2. Shared access points have been proposed and parking lots modified or eliminated to meet the minimum separation required by VDDT for access points on streets to 'be dedicated to the State. 3. The number of townhouse units has been increased from 31 units to 32 units. These changes address some of the site design and fieasibility issues raised in the staff's report of October 2. One additional comment resulting from these changes is the. effect of relocating the power line easement on the required screening and bufifering. If this proposal is approved, a twenty-five foot landscaped buffer yard would be required along the eastern boundary in order to buffer the proposed townhouses from the existing residences. The use of the same area as a power line easement may not be practical or feasible. In summary, these modifications do not alter the staff's general comments, or those pertaining to the consistency of this proposals with the policies and recommendation of the Comprehensive Plan. Finally, none of the changes made in the revised concept plan alter the suggested proffered conditions recommended by staff in the October 2 report dealing with limiting the density, height, lighting of the proposed townhouse project. i_;~.... 1 STAFF REPORT ~ ~"` CABS NUMBERS 30-10/90 PETITIONER: STEVE BROWN Petition of Steve Brown townhouses, located on Magisterial District. NATURE OF_RE4IIE$T REVIEIiED HY: ANITA MCMILLAN DATE: OCTOBER 2,1990 to rezone 7.8 acres from R-1 to R-3 to construct Hardy Road (Route 634) near Wolf Creek, Vinton a. Unconditional request to rezone a 7.8 acre parcel of land from single family residential district, R-1 to multi-family residential district, R-3, for the stated purpose of building 31 two-bedroom unit townhouses. b. Attached concept plan and zoning vicinity map describe the project in more detail. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS a. The R-3, Multi-family Residential District, permits a variety of residential uses including multi-family dwellings, duplexes, townhouses and high-rise apartments. Churches, day care centers and nursery schools are also permitted within the R-3 district. Petition- er has indicated in the letter of application that he proposes a townhouse development for this property. No proffered conditions have been submitted which would limit the use of this property. b. Height limitations range from three stories to thirty-five (35) feet for townhouses to twelve (12) stories or one-hundred twenty-five feet for high-rise apartments. No proffered conditions have been submitted which would limit height. b. Site plan review will be required to ensure compliance with all County development regulations. c. An entrance permit will be required from the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT), Petitioner proposes for streets and future street extension and all parking. areas to be constructed to VDOT standards. Alternately petitioner could build private roads and parking areas, in conformance with the County Street Standards. VDOT reserves the right to require a traffic impact study upon application for an entrance permit. SITE CHARACTERISTICS TOPOGRAPHY: Moderately sloping upward away from Hardy Road towards the proposed townhouse development. GROUND COVER: Some of the such as dogwood, hawthorn primarily of black cherry ~RFA CHARACTERI$TIC$ site is heavily wooded with mature tree cover and cedar. Shrub stage vegetation consisting. and black berry. FIITURE GROWTH PRIORITY: Situated within the Vinton Community Planning Area. The Comprehensive Development Plan indicates that, growth should be stabilized in this area. Urban services are available. ~` ~° i GEbiSRAL AREA is developed with single-family residences, located to the east, west and south of the proposed townhouse development. The proposed site adjoins a portion of Bush Valley Swim Club Inc. LAND U8E IMPACT A88E88MENT Rating: Rate each factor according to the impact of the proposed action. Use a scale of 1 through 5. 1 = positive impact, 2 = negligible impact, 3 = manageable impact, 4 = disruptive impact, 5 = severe impact, and N/A = not applicable. RATING FACTOR COMMENTS LAND USE COMPATIBILITY 4 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: 1985 Comprehensive Development Plan has placed this area within a Neighborhood Conservation land use category. This is a land use area where established single-family neighborhoods are delineated and the conservation of the existing development pattern is encouraged. Middle-high (6-12 units per acre) and high (12-24 units per acre) density residential, which are allowed in the R-3 zoning district, are discouraged and prohibited respectively within a Neighborhood Conservation land use category. Low-middle (1-3 units per acre) to middle (3-6 units per acre) density residential uses are permitted with moderate to high compatibility. Under Neighborhood Conservation land use category, parks and low density residential ranging from less than 1 unit per acre to 1-3 units per acre are encouraged. The petitioner should proffer that no more than 4 dwelling units per acre would be constructed on the proposed property. The proposed development of townhouse is not consistent with Policy NC-8 (permit limited density attached residential development, provided exceptional housing design and site planning techniques are employed to achieve compatibility). ~ BURROUNDING LAND: Wooded area with mature trees and shrub stage vegetation, Bush Valley Swim Club, Hardy Road, and single family subdivisions. ~ NEIGHBORINQ AREA: Includes existing single-family subdivisions at a density of approximately 3-4 units per acre, immediately to the east. Single-family residences on the west and south have average densities of approximately 1-2 houses per acre. Bush Valley Swim Club is to the west of the proposed development. ~ BITE LAYOUTS Proposal includes 8 buildings containing 31 two bedroom units. Townhouse development must comply with the site plan design criteria contained within Section 21-41-2, paragraph B, of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance. Concept plan shows that the pro- posed public street and some of the townhouses are located under and within the Appalachian Power Company (APCO) easement, which is not permitted. The proposed townhouse complex will be accessed by way of Hardy Road. The proposed public street must meet VDOT standards. ~ ARCHITECTURE: No rendering has been submitted. 3 SCREENING-AND LANDSCAPING: The petitioner has not proffered screening and landscaping. As part of the site plan review process, petitioner will be required to comply with the screening and buffering provisions of the County's Zoning Ordinance. ~~~-- 3 ~ AMENITIES: Adequate parking spaces have been proposed for the townhouse development (ordinance requires 62 parking spaces; 68 parking spaces have been proposed). No on-site recreational facility is proposed. ~ NATIIRAL FEATIIRES: Site is covered with shrub stage vegetation and mature trees. TRAFFIC 3 BTREET CAPACITIES: The 1988 ADT on Hardy Road between Vinton East Town Limit and McGeorge Drive was 11,615. The proposed townhouse development on the site will increase traffic along Hardy Road, by approximately 200 vehicle trips per day. Based on 1987-88 Traffic Accident Information, 14 accidents occurred along Hardy Road between Vinton East Town Limit and Feather Road. VDOT reserves the right to require a traffic impact study upon application for an entrance permit. 4 CIRCIILATION: Adequate. The proposed townhouse development will be served by an internal street that will be extended to Hardy Road as immediate access. Proposed concept plan does not conform to VDOT requirement that entrances to parking bays and/or individual units be separated by at least 50 feet. Proposal will have to meet all County requirements for fire and rescue services. IITILITIES 2 WATER: Adequate source and distribution. ~ SEWER: Adequate treatment and transmission. DRAINAC3E 2 BASIN: Wolf Creek Sub-basin. No problems noted. ~ FLOODPLAIN: None. PIIBLIC SERVICES 2 FIRE PROTECTION: Within established service area. ~ RESCIIE: Within established service area. 3 PARRB AND RECREATION: Petitioner is not proposing any on-site park facilities. The County's Vinton park district provides for Vinton planning area. However, the current acreage in this district is below the state recommended standards. ~ SCHOOLS: If 31 two bedroom townhouse units are constructed, it is anticipated that there would be 10 school age, residents. (This figure is based on regional demographic multipliers for two bedroom townhouse.) The elementary, junior high and high school facilities serving the Vinton district have adequate capacity to accommodate these students. The estimated cost of educating one child in Roanoke County is approximately $4,740.40, of which $2,317.80 is locally funded, based on 1990-91 Fiscal Year figure. Using this figure, staff estimates that this project could require an additional $23,170 of county educational services. ~~-~ 4 ~'AB BASE ~ LAND AND IMPROVEMENT VALOE: $750,000 TA%ABLE GROSS 8ALE8/YEAR: 0 TOTAL EMPLOYEES: 0 TOTAL REVENIIE TO THE COUNTY/YEAR: N/A ENVIRONMENT 2 AIR: 2 WATER: 2 SOILS: 2 NOISE: 2 SIGNAGE: In accordance with sign ordinance. PLAN CONSISTENCY This area is designated as Neighborhood Conservation. The proposal is not consistent with Policy NC-4 (Maintain open space, yards, and grounds in residential neighborhoods), Policy NC-7 (Avoid residential development that has a significantly different density, size, height, or scale from adjacent development) and Policy NC-8 (Permit limited density attached residential development, provided exceptional housing design and site planning techniques are employed to achieve compatibility). The proposed townhouse development has a density of approximately 3-4 units per acre. The petitioner does not indicate exceptional housing design and site planning techniques. STAFF EVALIIATION STRENGTHS: 1) The density (3-4 units/acre) of the proposed townhouse development is moderately compatible with recommended densities in the Neighborhood Conservation land use designation. WEAIQTESSEB: i) The proposed townhouse development will increase traffic along Hardy Road, by approximately 200 vehicle trips per day. 2) The petition is inconsistent with a number of policies contained in the Comprehensive Plan, including Policy NC-4, Policy NC-7 and Policy NC-8. 3) Petitioner has not proffered screening and buffering. 4) Some of the proposed townhouses and the public street are located under and within APCO easement. 5) No on-site recreational facility is proposed. 6) The concept plan shows that the entrances to parking bays and/or individual units does not meet the VDOT requirements. PROFFERS 80GGESTEDs 1) Petitioner should proffer conditions which ensure that site and parking area lighting does not adversely impact neighboring residences. 2) Petitioner should proffer the use as only townhouses, or in lieu of this proffer, proffer a height not to exceed three and one half stories or 45 feet. 3) Petitioner should proffer density that will not exceed 4 houses per acre. 4) Proffer Type B screening and buffering, which is required between single family dwellings and townhouse development. DEC-10-1990 13 06 FROM CUNDIFF RX 703 343 8214 TO 7722030 P.02 iP. E. CUNDIFF REAL BSTATB•BUiLDBR•DBVBLOPBR tt8 Soutb~ Pollard Street • D~a~ 344.5585 V~NTpN, VIRGINIA 2479 Qecember 10, 1990 Mx. Jvn Hartley Roanoke County Planning pepartment P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 2x018 Re: Case Number 30-10/90 Rezoning Request for Townhouses Oear Mr. Hartley: We respectfully submit the Following proffers for the above mentioned case. (1) The height limitation of any stucture shall not exceed 35 feet. (2) Use of the property shall be restricted only to the construction of not more than 32 townhouse vna,ts, and related site improvements associated with townhouse developments. .'NOR` vwi r- ho• Y .I (3) Screening and buffering shall comply with requ~.rements of Section 21-92 of the Zoning Ordinance, as amended. Credit shall be considered For tz~ees and vegetation remaininv after construction which meet the intent and purposes of the ordinance requirements. (4) Streets serving the townhouse units shall be designed and constructed to VDOT standards, and uQon completi~vn shall be dedicated to the state highway system for ownershia and maintenance. Sincerely, ~~ • f~ ~~ W. uff i; ~~ \ tWO~ un~ ~ a 3 ~ ~ 3 ~ a i p~t v \\\~3'~\ ~ 1 jj~$~wi~t M3~y~ '~ \ a ~ Ol k\ q ~ ii ~Y t \ \ ~ 0 -.O k k ~ wZ o' Q \ ~ V `\ s~ ~ a k / , , \p ,\ / ~, ~ ~ w ~ l ~ \ \/ \ D \ 111 \ \ ,. \ `` O \ ~ I 1 \ p ~ \\ I ~ \ 4 ~ \ ® it ~\ \ q o„ 1 1 ~~ \ 1 1 , ~~ y p 'cY \ 1 1 \ pQ~ ,~ p I ~ ~ 1 1~ •~ \ 1 I \ \\\ tCC • t~ . ~j.. - 1 i 1 ~ \ . ~ i I \\ \\ I~J~.1 / ~a: r ~' I/ 1 1 1 ~~'/ 1 \ \ k~ ~ Q ~ - L 1 ~ ~ `/ 1 \ \ ~ p 1= 1 1 ,i' I ~ T • ~•1 I~ ~~ I 1 J ~ O, ~ ~u; 1 I l l a~ I \ ~ , / / ~ , Its 1 \ d ~ , _ 'I i i I© i ~ ~. I I c I I I I~ 1 t ' ~ ~ \ I i I / I I ~i ; i ~ / /~ k ~ / r t ~' ~ ~ I s l ` ~ ~/ ~ i ~ o ~ .. ~1 1 ~ / o ~~ 1mm 1 I I / ~~ ~~ 7r t W ~ ` I ~ ~ 01 w~ ~ k e \ 1 ~ 10~ ~ i ~ i i~q• ~ s!~ q \\ © 1 QI ~ // '~ ti kk~'~o~~kwwg Q I / ~~ `8 E~ yyt \ 4 k~ k V G A Vkawt\k w \te ~~/ ~ i ~ /~// / 3~1~ awtile wwi rs<< d /~ r ~~' ~~ .i X~, ~ it ~ e wi i ~i (~~ ~ ,~_, ~ O, % ~/ ~ i ' / ~ / /' .4-- - ~0. / ~, /~ / ~~~-- ~ ~ / ~,_ __ , > //, / e ~,i __ __ ~ ' ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ / ak r ,~ c ~- • ' ~ yr l H uu p W iK~fIP( SQw~r ~ 7 ~ : UgOENr ~ ~ '~!~ f 4 Q .._:~ . ~ ~ r ~ G ~ 4 (pJdNt N ~^,, ~'~~ VIN7~ti YY0005~%' • 't'/0~ ~ ~~°" ~ VICINI?1' MAP ., ; _ w 4 ~ ~ !^ ?~.. , ~ ~~`~ ~ r - ~, ~~ NORTH • ~ ~'' ~ ~~ ~_ M I /~.t~ Z _ ~ r~ Nf _ - ~ ^ ~• • ., ~ ~ l ~ i O t ' 1 t ~ ~;_ R , 65 } • ~r~- ~ • •• Mf•/ ` ` r_` TowN ---- -- ~ ~ ` • • ~~` * ti r• 1 ~ / 1 • K ~` ~• •~• YINTD~I . •. ~ ~ ~ i '~ ~ '' O :. ~ • • ' ~ • . • ~ ~ • r ~ ,.. ~ ~ • . i ~ ~ ' ~ • ~. ~ •. • • • t ~, *. • •~ .~ _ L ` ' ~ ~ ~' .L ~ '~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t f. • ~ ' . i l• ~ .~. s : ~ r _ .L • . ~. ~ i M1 1~ ~. l y ` ~ '~.1 ~ ~ , ~ , .~~ .- ~ i ~ ~ i ~_~.. ~ , ~ `. . • • ~~~ M ~ •~ • ~ ~ • • f ~ • • • • r.. • • ~ ~~ ~ • ~ ~ •. • • • f , ~ • • ~ •~,,. ~ . ~ Ali. ~A~c~~.s ~ ~ - . xo y~'A ~ u~tt.~ss o~+~w~sE Nark. COMMUNITY SSRVICBS STEVE BROiwPi ANDDB'VBLOPMI;NT ~ R-1 to R-3 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, DECEMBER 18, 1990 ORDINANCE TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A 7.8 ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED ON HARDY ROAD (ROUTE 634) NEAR WOLF CREEK (A PORTION OF TAX MAP NO. 62.18-2-25 AND ALL OF TAX MAP NO. 61.18-2-25.1) IN THE VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF R-1 TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF R-3 UPON THE APPLICATION OF STEVE BROWN WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on September 25, 1990, and the second reading and public hearing was held December 18, 1990; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on December 4, 1990; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing 7.8 acre, as described herein, and located on Hardy Road (Route 634) near Wolf Creek, (a portion of Tax Map Number 62.18-2-25 and all of Tax Map No. 61.18-2-25.1) in the Vinton Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of R-1, Single Family Residential District, to the zoning classification of R-3, Multi-Family Residential District. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of Steve Brown. 3. That the owner has voluntarily proffered in writing the following conditions which the Board of Supervisors hereby accepts: a. The .height limitation of any structure shall not exceed 35 feet. b. Use of the property shall be restricted only to the construction of not more than 32 townhouse units, and related site improvements associated with townhouse developments. c. Screening and buffering shall comply with requirements of Section 21-92 of the zoning ordinance, as amended. Credit shall be considered for trees and vegetation remaining after construction which meet the intent and purposes of the ordinance requirements. d. Streets serving the townhouse units shall be designed and constructed to VDOT standards and upon completion shall be dedicated to the state highway system for ownership and maintenance. 4. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: A certain tract or parcel of land (a portion of Tax Map No. 62.18-2-25) lying and being in the Vinton Magisterial District, Roanoke County, Virginia, and being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at an iron rod, said road being S. 77 deg. 22 min. 27 sec. E. 111.00 feet from the northwest corner of Tax Parcel 61.18-2-25.1; thence, N. 40 deg. 18 min. 25 sec. E. for a distance of 220.66 feet to a point; thence, S. 48 deg. 21 min. 29 sec. E. for a distance of 140.00 feet to a point; thence along a proposed road with a curve to the left having a radius of 271.80 feet and an arc length of 158.63 feet, being subtended by a chord of S. 48 deg. 00 min. 48 sec. W. for a distance of 156.39 feet to a point; thence, N. 77 deg. 22 min. 27 sec. W. for a distance of 134.37 feet to the Point of Beginning; together with and subject to covenants, easements, and restrictions of record; said property containing 0.524 acres, more or less. A certain tract or parcel of land (Tax Map No. 61.18-2- 25.1) located on Hardy Road (State Route 634) in the Vinton Magisterial District, Roanoke County, Virginia, approximately 70 feet southeast of Wolfe Creek and the Town of Vinton Corporate Line and being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING on a point on the northern right-of-way line of Hardy Road (State Route 634 - variable width right-of- way) ; thence, N. 47 deg. 34 min 32 sec. E. for a distance of 427.83 feet to an iron pin; thence, N. 10 deg. 51 min. 48 sec. W. for a distance of 199.86 feet to an iron pin; thence, N. 17 deg. 52 min. 40 sec. W. for a distance of ~~~w 259.62 feet to an iron pin; thence, S. 77 deg. 22 min. 27 sec. E. for a distance of 390.81 feet to an iron pin; thence, S. 05 deg. 13 min. 40 sec. W. for a distance of 948.84 feet to an iron pin on the northern right-of-way line of State Route 634 (variable width right-of-way); thence, S. 62 deg. 30 min. 10 sec. W. for a distance of 34.62 feet to a point; thence, N. 58 deg. 18 min. 32 sec. W. for a distance of 88.56 feet to a point; thence, N. 58 deg. 39 min. 30 sec. W. for a distance of 49.75 feet to a point; thence, N. 58 deg. 02 min. 30 sec. W. for a distance of 149.34 feet to a point; thence, along a curve to the right having a radius of 5704.58 feet and an arc length of 199.13 feet, being subtended by a chord of N. 57 deg. 02 min. 30 sec. W. for a distance of 199.12 feet to a point; thence, N. 42 deg. 19 min. 20 sec. W. for a distance of 15.23 feet to a point; thence N. 43 deg. 16 min. 43 sec. W. for a distance of 59.46 feet to a point, said point being the POINT OF BEGINNING; together with and subject to covenants, easements, and restrictions of record; said property contains 7.296 acres, more or less. 5. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. 1 ACTION NO. f~ ~+ ~e ITEM NO . "`""~` i~ ~ '~"` ! AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: December 18, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: ORDINANCE AMENDING AND REENACTING SECTION 4-99 "AUDIT OF REPORTS AND RECORDS" OF ARTICLE V. "BINGO GAMES AND RAFFLES", OF CHAPTER 4, "AMUSEMENTS", OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE, AND PROVIDING FOR AN INCREASE IN THE AUDIT FEE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~ /~~~~~ EXECUTIVE SUMMARY' The 1990 session of the Virginia General Assembly adopted Chapter 903 which amended Section 18.2-340.7. This amendment authorized an increase in the local audit fee from 1~ to 2~ of the gross receipts from bingo games. BACKGROUND' Over the past year the Board has taken action to establish fees for certain services. The Board has determined that it is in the public interest to increase certain user fees to recover a portion of the direct and indirect costs of providing certain services. The Board has also determined that it is equitable to ensure that those individuals who benefit from certain governmental services should bear a portion of the cost of providing those services. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Section 4-99 of the County Code establishes a 1~ audit fee of the gross receipts which an organization reports on money received from bingo and instant bingo operations. State law directs that the audit fee be calculated upon the gross receipts which an organization reports and the interest income on money that the organization has received from bingo or instant bingo operations. The 1990 session of the Virginia General Assembly amended the authorizing legislation to allow local governments to increase the audit fee from 1~ to 2~ of the gross receipts and interest income. The audit fees for 1989 totaled $6436.55. Attached you will find information provided by the ~',.. Commissioner of the Revenue listing gross receipts, audit fees and organizations for the past three years. The Board requested this information at its December 4, 1990, meeting. The draft ordinance provides that all audit fees received shall be separately accounted for and shall be used only for purposes of auditing and regulating bingo games and raffles. The effective date of this draft ordinance is January 1, 1991. FISCAL IMPACTS• It is anticipated that the revenues generated by this ordinance will result in an additional $5,000.00 to $6,000.00 per calendar year. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Board favorably consider the adoption of the proposed ordinance. Respectfully submitted, ~~ Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney Action Vote No Yes Abs Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by Eddy Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers fags -~ BINGO/RAFFLE November 1, 1987 - October 31, 1988 Gross Receipts 9655, 788. 00 Audit Fee 6, 525. 69 November 1, 1988 - October 31, 1989 Gross Receipts 9641, 377. 00 Audit Fee 6, 641.55 November 1, 1989 - September 30, 1990 Gross Receipts 5638, 224. 00 Audit Fee 6, 436. 55 October 1, 1990 - Gross ReceiptB 5 21, 675. 00 Audit Fee 240.00 1~~~-7 Bingo/Raffle Permits tcont) 1988 Name Rke Moose Lodge bingo) Rke Moose Lodge North Cross School Oak Grove Elem Botetourt Jaycee Community School Northside High School Cave Spring High School Green Valley Elem PTA Mason Cove Elem PTA Penn Forest Elem Northside Jr HS Bent Mtn Woman's Vinton Moose Lodge Roanoke Moose Lodge (bingo) Roanoke Moose Lodge Ft. Lewis Rescue (bingo) Grose Receipts X519, 796. 00 907. 00 10, 615. 00 2, 312. 10 27, 500. 00 1, 169. 00 3, 028. 00 2, 564. 00 1, 017. 12 225. 00 89, 065. 84 518, 476. 00 39, 735. 00 .Audit Fee 85, 197. 97 000. 00 106. 15 25. 00 275. 00 25. 00 30. 28 25. 64 25. 00 25. 00 890. 65 5, 184. 76 397.35 ~ ~ ~ ~ Bingo/Raffle Permits (cont) 1989 18, 130. 00 181.30 Botetourt Jaycee 149.00 25.00 Oak Grove Ruthenian Society 612. 00 17 176. 00 Vinton Moose Lodge (bingo) , 333.00 50.00 Roanoke Moose Lodge Penn Forest School 741.00 1 17. 41 Northside Athletic , 908. 00 1 25. 00 Mason Cove School , 795. 30 10 North Croes School , 376.00 25.00 Cave Spring HS 149. 00 25. 00 , Oak Grove Elem 613.00 Waived Rke Co Dept Parks & Rev 971. 20 2 25. 00 Cave Spring Elem PTA , 27, 500. 00 275. 00 Botetourt Jaycees 020. 00 1 25. 00 Wm Byrd HS Booster , Rke Moose Lodge .~1 1990 Rke Moose Lodge bingo) Vinton Moose Lodge (bingo) Ft Lewis Rescue Sq (bingo) Rke Moose Lodge Rke County Occ School PTA Rke Co School Food Service Botetourt Jaycees Cave Spring Jaycees Cave Spring Booster Club Cave Spring Little League North Cross School Clearbrook Rescue Aux Hidden Valley Jr HS Rke Co AMVETS Cave Spring HS Northside Spring HS Botetourt Jaycees Penn Forest Elem PTA Mason Cove Elem PTA Glenvar HS Booster Cave Spring Elem PTA Unity Church Rke Valley Roanoke Moose Lodge 50/50 Bingo/Raffle Permits 9434, 128. 86 138, 135. 25 24, 724. 91 490. 00 753. 00 205. 24 18, 130. 00 2, 359. 00 285. 00 6, 368. 75 179. 00 7, 025. 00 16, 500. 00 344. 00 18, 500. 00 1, 976. 45 645. 00 2, 554. 20 8 4, 077. 39 1, 381.35 247. 25 25. 00 25. 00 25. 00 181.30. 25. 00 25. 00 63. 69 25. 00 75. 00 165. 00 25. 00 185. 00 25. 00 25. 00 25. 54 ~ a ~~-? AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, DECEMBER 18, 1990 ORDINANCE AMENDING AND REENACTING SECTION 4-99 "AUDIT OF REPORTS AND RECORDS" OF ARTICLE V. "BINGO GAMES AND RAFFLES," OF CHAPTER 4, "AMUSEMENTS," OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE, AND PROVIDING FOR AN INCREASE IN THE AUDIT FEE WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on November 13, 1990; the second reading and public hearing were held on December 4, 1990, and continued to December 18, 1990; and WHEREAS, the Board has taken action to authorize the establishment of fees for certain services, and further, the Board has determined that it is in the public interest to increase certain user fees, in order to recover a portion of the direct and indirect costs of providing certain services as provided herein; and, WHEREAS, the Board has found that it is both equitable and efficient to ensure that those individuals who benefit from certain governmental services bear an appropriate portion of the cost thereof while reducing general service cost subsidies; and WHEREAS, Section 18.2-340.7 of the Code of Virginia, as amended by the 1990 session of the Virginia General Assembly (Chapter 903) authorized an increase in the local audit fee from 1~ (one percent) to 2~ (two percent) of the gross receipts which an organization reports and of the interest income on money that the organization received from bingo or instant bingo operations. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA: 1 i ~~'~-? 1. That Section 4-99 of the Roanoke County Code is amended and reenacted as follows: (a) All reports filed pursuant to this article shall be audited by the commissioner of revenue. The commissioner of revenue is hereby authorized to charge a minimum audit fee of twenty-five dollars ($25.00) and a maximum audit fee of ___~ r-. =~„'~ two percent of ..( i~ the gross receipts which an organization reports pursuant to this article; and (ii) interest income on money that the organization has received from bingo or instant bin o operations. Such audit fee shall be payable by the organization to the commissioner of revenue and such amount charged by the commissioner shall represent the amount of time and other services expended by the commissioner on the audit. All audit fees received shall be separately accounted for and shall be used onlv_for the purposes of auditing and regulating binao games and raffles. (b) The provisions of this section shall not be construed so as to prohibit the commissioner of revenue or any official designated by the board of supervisors from performing unannounced audits or restrict any right of the commissioner or such official to secure records required to be maintained by the provisions of this article. 2. That the provisions of this ordinance shall be in full 2 laeo-~ force and effect for all permits issued from and after January 1, 1991. ,.. 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 j),I ~ _ ... .~ ... EARANCE RE VEST _ A.PP Q _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ __ i - - _ _ - ~ = AGENDA ITEM NO. ~ _ i z~ ~'~~ _ _ _ .~ _ _ c ~- __ SUBJECT ~ ~ ~~~ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supex~tisors to recognize me during the public hearingg on the above matter ALLED TO THE PODIUM, c so that I ma comment.WHEN C _ =_ L GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE I WIL RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES _ LISTED BELOW. __ _ • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment -_ whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. "' s - ~ _ • Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Ques- Lions of cl ' 'cation may be entertained by the Chairman. __ Debate between arecognized • All comments must be directed to the Board. = speaker and audience members is not allowed. __ • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all tunes. __ _ • Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments = with the clerk. c • INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FQR AN ORGANIZED _ GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT c = = THEM. = __ = PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO DEPUTY CLERK _ - = NAME ~~ U ~ ~ ~~-~ ~ 7 ~ ~~ ~1~? L-~ ~},~ ~~ ~? ~ ~'~~ s ~ -. ,---` ADDRESS ~ 7 y/ ~ .~3 ~`~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~h1~Z~~~~ • - - ~ - PHONE ,~ ~' y " ~ ~ c m{~~~~~~~~~~~I~II~IIIIIIilllllililllllllll l lllllllillllilllllillllllllililllllllllillllillllllillllllilllllillllillllillllllllll ~ ; .~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, DECEMBER 18, 1990 ORDINANCE 121890-13 AMENDING THE 1985 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN BY INCORPORATING INTO SAID PLAN THE ROANORE COUNTY CORRIDOR STUDY WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors adopted the Roanoke County Land Use Plan on June 25, 1985; and WHEREAS, public necessity, convenience, general welfare and good zoning practice has from time to time required that this plan be modified; and WHEREAS, the Roanoke River Corridor Council has with the full support and participation of Roanoke County completed the Roanoke River Corridor Study dated June 1990; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed and discussed the analysis, conclusion, and recommendations of the Roanoke River Corridor Study, and following a duly advertised public hearing as required by Section 15.1-431 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, on December 4, 1990, adopted a resolution recommending that the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan be amended to incorpo- rate the analysis, conclusions, and recommendations of said study; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on December 4, 1990; the second reading and public hearing was held on December 18, 1990; and WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: ~ ~ 1. That the 1985 Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan is hereby amended to incorporate the analysis, conclusions and recommenda- tions of the Roanoke River Corridor Study. The Roanoke River Corridor Study contains information, policy, goals, objectives, and recommendations to guide the County in the land use decision process. 2. That the effective date of this ordinance shall be December 18, 1990. On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Mary H. lien, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Terry Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning 1 ACTION NO. ~'^,~ ,.. ITEM NO . '~~~ ~ ~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: December 18, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: Ordinance to amend the 1985 Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan by incorporating into the plan the analysis, conclusions and recommendations contained in the September 1990 Roanoke River Corridor Study. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND' The Roanoke River Corridor Study began in 1987 as an unprecedented cooperative effort involving all of the local governments having jurisdiction along the Roanoke River, from its headwaters in Montgomery County to Smith Mountain Lake. In addition, the study involved the cooperation and staff assistance of four Planning District Commissions, several state agencies, numerous special interest groups and a group of dedicated citizens. The study was originated and conceived in 1987 by the efforts of the Roanoke County and Roanoke City Planning Commissions which expressed a desire to work jointly on a project of regional significance. A Roanoke River Corridor Council (RRCC) comprised of representatives of the participating jurisdictions and agencies was established to oversee the process and prepare the study report. The study, completed in September of this year, was sent to the various jurisdictions for review and adoption. The Planning Commission reviewed the study during November, and held a public hearing to receive comments on the study on December 4, 1990. Following the hearing, the Commission recommended that the County Comprehensive Plan be amended to incorporate the analysis, conclusions and recommendations of the study. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION The study contains a set of information, policy goals, objectives, and recommendations which local governments may use to guide their decision making. Short and long term recommendations 2 are offered. Initially, the RRCC recommends that the study be adopted as an amendment to the comprehensive plans of the jurisdictions involved. In addition, it is recommended that the Planning Directors of the jurisdictions participate in the creation of a Roanoke River Conservation District Commission, the purpose of which would be to jointly develop a river conservation overlay zone that would encompass the study area. Long term recommendations focus on greenway plans for the river corridor, and the development and implementation of erosion and sedimentation control strategies, and comprehensive stormwater management plans for the river corridor. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends as follows: 1. That the Board of Supervisors accept the recommendation of the Roanoke County Planning Commission and amend the 1985 Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan to incorporate the analysis, conclusions and recommendations of the Roanoke River Corridor Study. Respectfully submitted, Terrance L. Harringt AICP Director of Planni and Zoning Action Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by Approved, ~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator Eddy Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers Vote No Yes Abs ~~~~~ A RESOLUTION OF THE ROANORE COIINTY PLANNING COMMISSION SUPPORTING THE AMENDMENT OF THE 1985 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN BY INCORPORATING THE ROANORE RIVER CORRIDOR STUDY. WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Board of 1985 and s adopted the Roanoke County Land Use Plan on June 25, WHEREAS, public necessity, convenience, and general welfare has from time to time required that this plan be modified; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke River Corridor Council has with the full support and participation of Roanoke County completed the Roanoke River Corridor Study dated June 1990; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed and discussed the analysis, conclusions, and recommendations of the Roanoke River Corridor Study; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has advertised and held a public hearing in accordance with Section 15.1-431 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, for the purpose of hearing public comments on said study. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Roanoke County Planning Commission supports the analysis, conclusions, and recommendations of the Roanoke River Corridor Study and has found the study worthy of inclusion as a necessary component of the 1985 Roanoke County Land Use Plan. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that t1985 Roanoke County Land Usea Plane Board of Supervisors amend the by incorporating into the Plan the analysis, conclusions and recommendations of the Roanoke River Corridor Study. Adopted this 4th Day of December, 1990 ~ ~, Michael J. ordon, Chairman Roanoke County Planning Commission Terrance L. Harri ton, Secretary Roanoke County Pl nning Commission .~ /.2~D-~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, DECEMBER 18, 1990 ORDINANCE AMENDING THE 1985 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN BY INCORPORATING INTO RAID PLAN THE ROANORE COUNTY CORRIDOR STUDY WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors adopted the Roanoke County Land Use Plan on June 25, 1985; and WHEREAS, public necessity, convenience, general welfare and good zoning practice has from time to time required that this plan be modified; and WHEREAS, the Roanoke River Corridor Council has with the full support and participation of Roanoke County completed the Roanoke River Corridor Study dated June 1990; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed and discussed the analysis, conclusion, and recommendations of the Roanoke River Corridor Study, and following a duly advertised public hearing as required by Section 15.1-431 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, on December 4, 1990, adopted a resolution recommending that the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan be amended to incorpo- rate the analysis, conclusions, and recommendations of said study; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on December 4, 1990; the second reading and public hearing was held on December 18, 1990; and WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. 1 i2~~-- BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the 1985 Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan is hereby amended to incorporate the analysis, conclusions and recommenda- tions of the Roanoke River Corridor Study. The Roanoke River Corridor Study contains information, policy, goals, objectives, and recommendations to guide the County in the land use decision process. 2. That the effective date of this ordinance shall be December 18, 1990. 2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, DECEMBER 18, 1990 ORDINANCE 121890-14 TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A 0.67 ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED AT 7770 WILLIAMSON ROAD (TAX MAP NO. 27.11-1-44) IN THE HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF B- 1 TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF B-2 UPON THE APPLICATION OF HOLLIN3 COLLEGE CORPORATION WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on December 4, 1990, and the second reading and public hearing was held December 18, 1990; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on December 4, 1990; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing 0.67 acre, as described herein, and located at 7770 Williamson Road, (Tax Map Number 27.11-1-44) in the Hollins Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of B-1, Office District, to the zoning classification of B-2, General Commercial District. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of Hollins College Corporation. 3 . That said real estate is more fully described as follows BEGINNING at an iron point set in the present northwest line of Lee Highway U. S. Route No. 11, 80 feet wide, said point being N. 69 deg. 00 min. E. 107.58 feet from the present southeast corner of Lot 16, on the map of subdivision of F. M. Stutsman property recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court for the County of Roanoke, Virginia, in Plat Book 1, page 294; thence N. 21 deg. 00 min. W. 250.01 feet to an old iron pin in the Hollins College, Incorporated line; thence continuing with the Hollins College, Incorporated line, N. 53 deg. 05 min. E. 48.11 feet to an iron pin also in the Hollins College line; thence, continuing with the Hollins College line S. 57 deg. 11 min. E. 150.53 feet to an iron pin set in the western boundary line of Hollins College Incorporated and the eastern line of the captioned property; thence with said division line S. 17 deg. 29 min. E. 142 feet to a point on the northwest line of Lee Highway, U. S. Route No. 11; thence, with Lee Highway, U. S. Route No. 11, S. 69 deg. 0 min. W. 126.42 feet to the point and place of beginning, being the eastern portion of Lot 17 of the subdivision of F. M. Stutsman property; containing 0.67 acre; and being more fully shown on a plat of survey made by Raymond C. Weeks, SCLS, dated September 9, 1969. 4. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: ~~ ~~~ J~ . Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Development & Inspections Terry Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning John Willey, Director, Real Estate Assessment r ~ ,~ PETITIONER: HOLLINS COLLEGE CORPORATION CASE NUMBER: 33-12/90 Planning Commission Hearing Date: December 4, 1990 /~?-,<,~..t-r~ Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: December 18, 1990 A. REQUEST Petition of Hollins College Corporation to rezone 0.67 acre from B- 1 to B-2 to operate a restaurant, located at 7770 Williamson Road, Hollins Magisterial District. B. CITIZEN COMMENTS None. C. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION The Commission asked if Hollins College would place restrictions on the wine and beer license, over and above what the state requires and were told it would be state regulated. D. PROFFERED CONDITIONS None. E. COMMISSION ACTION(S) Mr. Massey moved to approve the petition which carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Massey, Winstead, Witt, Robinson, Gordon NAYS: None ABSENT: None F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE None. G. ATTACHMENTS: ~ Concept Plan ~ Vicinity Map Staff Report Other Terrance H ringto Secretary Roanoke unty Pl ning Commission STAFF REPORT CASE NUMBER: 33-12/90 PETITIONER:. HOLLINS COLLEGE CORP. ~~ ~ ~ REVIEWED BY: LYNN DONIHE DATE: DECEMBER 4, 1990 Petition of Hollins College Corporation to rezone a 0.67 acre parcel from B-1 to B-2 in order to operate a restaurant, located at 7770 Williamson Road, Hollins Magisterial District. NATURE OF REQUEST a. Unconditional request to operate a sandwich and seafood restaurant and delicatessen in existing (vacant) office building. Concept plan indicates restaurant will include eight. 4-seat tables and approximately 600 square feet of retail space. b. Concept plan and vicinity map describe project further. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS a. Property is currently zoned B-1. Restaurant and retail uses require B-2 zoning. ' b. Site plan review will be required in order to ensure compliance with County development standards. c. Commercial entrance permit must be obtained from VDOT. SITE CHARACTERISTICS TOPOGRAPHY: Site is fairly level throughout. GROUND COVER: Front portion of site is developed with building and paved parking area. Rear portion of site is forested with elm, cedar, and tree ~' of heaven. AREA CHARACTERISTICS FUTURE GROWTH PRIORITY: Situated within the Peters Creek Community Planning Area. Designated as an area for stimulating growth. Urban services are available. GENERAL AREA is heavily developed with commercial and retail uses, offices, institutional uses, a heavily traveled primary road, and some residential. LAxD USE IMPACT ASSESSMENT Rating: Rate each factor according to the impact of the proposed action. Use a scale of 1 through 5. 1 = positive impact, 2 = negligible impact, 3 = manageable impact, 4 = disruptive impact, 5 = severe impact, and N/A = not applicable. RATING FACTO COMMENTS LAND IISE COMPATIBILITY 3 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: 1985 Comprehensive Development Plan has placed this area within a Transition Land Use category. General retail uses are discouraged with low compatibility in the Transition areas, and are suggested to a limited degree if they are clustered or within a planned shopping center, rather than stripped along major routes. The land use plan recognizes certain principles of highway frontage development including the location of transition areas stripped along entry ways to the County's urban core centers, and the decline of central shopping areas in core locations due to haphazard commercial strip development. ' /~ yo- Although the development policies in the land use plan are directed more toward new development and the conversion of single-family residential uses than toward existing development, several deserve note: Policy TR-1 encourages prevention of haphazard commercial sprawl along major highway strips and discourages free-standing retail uses. Policy TR-2 encourages new retail uses to develop in planned shopping centers or in planned groupings of independent buildings, in order to permit controlled development of retail uses outside of core locations. TR-3 encourages reservation of frontage strips for major office facilities. TR-8 encourages enhancement of highway frontage through sign design, front yard landscaping, and location of building facades prominent from the street view, rather than signs, parking areas, and driveways. While petitioner's request is not consiste thewlenerale developmenttof the area the request is consistent with g 3 SURROUNDING LAND: Site is surrounded by a heavily traveled primary ~ highway on he north and east11arid a free st nding office on the weste campus on t 3 NEIGHBORING AREA: Much of the ne ahb us ng a Some o residentialn usest includes- the Hollins College p including apartment housing for Hollins College students, are located to the south~haofficeWuses a convenien~ceTret it t and generaleretailis developed wi 3 SITE LAYOUT: Existing. Site plan complies with basic site design criteria for development in B-1 and B-2 zoning districts. 3 ARCHITECTURE: Existing. 3 SCREENING AND LANDSCAPING: No additional screening or landscaping is shown on the concept plan, except around dumpster site as required. Screening and buffering per ordinance is not required on west, north, and east borders. 3 AMENITteStravel ane width, and handicapmspacesrper ordinance aces, adequa 1 NATURAL AinNforestedExaccordi g tots to plan n rear portion of site will rema TRAFFIC 1986 ADT for Williamson Road between Rt. 601 g STREET CAPACITIES: (just beyond County line in Botetourt County) and Peters Creek Road was 19,550•ze ofa restaurant is lim tedrand inconclusiveion for this type and si 3 CIRCULATION: Existing circulation pattern. .Proposed VDOT road project Por Route 11 and side connecting roads (Virginia Statewide Highway Plan) may affect site layout and on-site circulation of future expansions. UTILITIES 2 WATER: Adequate source and distribution. 2 SEWER: Adequate treatment and transmission. ~ ~ ~tAINAGE 2 BASIN: Tinker Creek FLOODPLAIN: Site is not within the 100-year floodplain as 2 designated by FEMA. PUBLIC SERVICES 3 FIRE PROTECTION: Within established service standard. Water and access requirements will be taken into consideration as the site plans are reviewed. 3 RESCUE: See "Fire Protec tion." N/A PARKS AND RECREATION: N/A SCHOOLS: TAX BASE N/A LAND AND IMPROVEI~NT VALUE: TAXABLE GROSS SALES/YEAR: TOTAL EIIpIAYEES TOTAL REVENUE TO THE COUNTY/YEAR: ENVIRONMENT 2 AIR: 2 WATER: 2 SOILS: 2 NOISE: 2 SIGNAGE: None specified in request. Must comply with Section 21- 93 of zoning ordinance. The B-2 district permits a maximum of 1.5 square feet of signage per linear foot of frontage (site has 127 feet of frontage x 1.5 = 190.5 square feet of signage.) PLAN CONSISTENCY This area is designated as Transition. Petitioner's request is inconsistent with policies TR-1 (discourages free-standing retail uses), TR-2 (new retail uses in planned shopping centers), and TR-3 (reserve highway frontage for office uses), but remains consistent with general development of area. STAFF EVALUATION STRENGTHS: (1) Approximately half the site remains wooded. (2) Existing developed site. WEAIQIESSES: (1) Petition is inconsistent with development policies of Transition land use category. f~ Y~ z ~~~ VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY uw oFF~s wog woa+s a -novE IN RE: Rezoning of 0.67 acres of land ) AMENDED located at 7770 Williamson Road )LETTER A~APPLICATION bearing offical tax no. 27.11-1-44 ) from B-1 Office District to B-2 )PETITION TO REZONE General Commercial District ) TO THE HONORABLE PLANNING COMMISSION AND BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY:. (1) The petitioner, Hollins College Corporation, is owner of a parcel of land located at 7770 Williamson Road in Roanoke County, Virginia containing 0.67 acres more or less bearing official tax no. 27.11-1-44. (2) The property is currently zoned Office District B-1 I E and the petitioner requests that the property be rezoned to General Commercial District B-2. The property, which is surrounded on three sides by property owned by the petitioner, is currently unoccupied, however, it has been used as a convenient store and real estate office in the past. The petitioner has. entered into an agreement for James Hufford, Jennie Hufford and Judy Hufford to operate a sandwich and seafood restaurant on the property. (3) The petitioner believes rezoning of the property to allow its use for restaurant purposes will further the intent and purpose of the County's zoning ordinance and comprehensive plan. The exterior of the building, parking facilities, road 25193 ~~ entrances and general appearance of the property will not be materially altered by its use as a restaurant. (4) The following documents are attached hereto as exhibits: a. Roanoke County rezoning application; b. Meets and bounds description of property; c. Vicinity map; d. Roanoke County Property Identification Map No. 27.11 e. List of adjacent property owners. f. Conceptual development plan for Hollins College Corporation. g. Application for Water or Sewer Service. i Respectfully submitted, ROLL EGE CORPORATION By : ~~ Of Counsel James F. Douthat, Esq. Woods, Rogers & Hazlegrove 105 Franklin Road, S.W. P.O. Box 720 Roanoke, VA 24004-0720 uw oF~s woo vooas a~ aovE -; ~vw K 25193 ._.f.... tp 1 i Fi~ s r~ ~~~ ~;ii ~ S fig' Q ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~6d e3 ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~e~ ~r t~a,~ r~~ ~~~ "~ ~ Y ~ ,~ ~~; ~~Y~ RR e8 ~, I- rw ••+'t 3 ~~ ~~~~ ~ 1 ~~ ~ , _ :~~~~ I Illi ~ 3~~1 ~~~i~is {~ ~~~ i ~~~ ~~ ,~~ w .urR.rw w~aa. ni vwuwmr i~ ars lrj~ ----~ --~ i .~ I ~~ .~ I I ~....o.. n r-hw ti ewar w Rrinv n-aRO.+a Hear: 1 ~I ~ ~ ~.; I ~- ~~~_~ ~~ ~~.i ~ I .,~ ~;, a ~~ ~ ~ ; Q ~~. ~ X og~& k sw~~~~ ~ ~ '~~~~ ~ a ~~ 3 0.a ~ a ~~~ ~ $~~ '` ~- m =w W Y 1'~'a~ :~ .. ,. g= °~ ~ z 0 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, DECEMBER 18, 1990 ORDINANCE TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A 0.67 ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED AT 7770 WILLIAMSON ROAD (TAX MAP NO. 27.11-1-44) IN THE HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF B-1 TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF B-2 UPON THE APPLICATION OF HOLLINS COLLEGE CORPORATION WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on December 4, 1990, and the second reading and public hearing was held December 18, 1990; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on December 4, 1990; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing 0.67 acre, as described herein, and located at 7770 Williamson Road, (Tax Map Number 27.11-1-44) in the Hollins Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of B-1, Office District, to the zoning classification of B-2, General Commercial District. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of Hollins College Corporation. 3. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: BEGINNING at an iron point set in the present northwest line of Lee Highway U. S. Route No. 11, 80 feet wide, said point being N. 69 deg. 00 min. E. 107.58 feet from the present southeast corner of Lot 16, on the map of subdivision of F. M. Stutsman property -~9®-9 recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court for the County of Roanoke, Virginia, in Plat Book 1, page 294 ; thence N. 21 deg. 00 min. W. 250.01 feet to an old iron pin in the Hollins College, Incorporated line; thence continuing with the Hollins College, Incorporated line, N. 53 deg. 05 min. E. 48.11 feet to an iron pin also in the Hollins College line; thence, continuing with the Hollins College line S. 57 deg. 11 min. E. 150.53 feet to an iron pin set in the western boundary line of Hollins College Incorporated and the eastern line of the captioned property; thence with said division line S. 17 deg. 29 min. E. 142 feet to a point on the northwest line of Lee Highway, U. S. Route No. 11; thence, with Lee Highway, U. S. Route No. 11, S. 69 deg. 0 min. W. 126.42 feet to the point and place of beginning, being the eastern portion of Lot 17 of the subdivision of F. M. Stutsman property; containing 0.67 acre; and being more fully shown on a plat of survey made by Raymond C. Weeks, SCLS, dated September 9, 1969. 4. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. ~ i AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, DECEMBER 18, 1990 ORDINANCE 121890-15 VACATING 340 FEET OF AN UNIMPROVED TWENTY-FIVE (25) FOOT RIGHT-OF-WAY, REFERRED TO AS "DALLAS ROAD," RECORDED IN PLAT BOOR 54, PAGE 52, OTTERVIEW GARDENS SUBDIVISION WHEREAS, F & B Developers Inc., the petitioner, has requested the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia to vacate 340 feet of an unimproved twenty-five (25) foot right-of-way referred to as "Dallas Road," dedicated to the County by plat of Otterview Gardens Subdivision found in Plat Book 54, page 52 in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia; and, WHEREAS, Section 15.1-482 (b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, requires that such action be accomplished by the adoption of an ordinance by the governing body; and, WHEREAS, notice has been given as required by Section 15.1- 431 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and a first reading of this ordinance was held on December 4, 1990; and the public hearing and second reading of this ordinance was held on December 18, 1990. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That 340 feet of an unimproved twenty-five (25) foot right-of-way running from Deer Branch Road to Otterview Drive along the lot line between Lots 7 and 13 of Otterview Gardens and Lot 33 of Barrens Village, said road referred to as "Dallas Road" and dedicated to Roanoke County by plat of Otterview Gardens Subdivi- sion found in Plat Book 54 at page 52 in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, be, and hereby is, vacated pursuant to Section 15.1-482 (b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended; and, 2. That as a condition of the adoption of this ordinance, the County reserves and retains a property interest within the twenty- five (25) foot right-of-way for use as a drainage and a water/ sanitary sewer easement in order to provide a looping of an eventual waterline between Otterview and Branch Drive; and, 3. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. 4. That F & B Developers Inc. shall record a certified copy of this ordinance with the Clerk of the Circuit Court and shall pay all fees required to accomplish this transaction. On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: `~ ~- Mary H. A len, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Development & Inspections Terry Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning ACTION # ITEM NUMBER f~ ~~~'~~ AT A REGULARAMHELDNAT THEHROANORE COUNTYEADMINISTRATION CENTER COUNTY, VIRGIN MEETING DATE: December 18, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: Vacate a 25 foot right-of-way known as "Dallas Road", shown on the map of Otterview Gardens Subdivision, recorded in Plat Book 54, Page 52, situated in the Catawba Magisterial District. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR' S COMMENTS : ,% _" -7" ~' J 0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The petitioner, F & B Developerroximatel 1 340 gfeetlnof tan Board of Supervisors to vacate app Y existing unimproved right-of-way, by Ordinance, in order to remove an encumbrance on the adjacent lot. BACKGROUND F & B Developers, Inc. , the developers of Barrens Village, has made application for a building permit on Lot 33, Block 2, Section 3 of Barrens Village. The proposed house, shown on the Plot Plan, cannot meet the side yard setbacks on the westerly property line because the lot is conside~e setbacknnormallytrequiredlforginteriorolotstinca RS1 the 10 foo Zoning District. The petitioners are requesting a vacation in order to maintain the size, and style, home that is presently being constructed in this subdivision. The adjacent property owners that would be affected by this right-of-way closing have contacted the County and they have expressed no opposition. It has brought to the attention of the staff that there is an existing drainage structure located in the right-of-way to be abandoned. Th nt Ordinance to oinclude drainageCasnone oft the uses amend the curre ~ ` ~~ that the County is retaining. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION The Roanoke County staff is requesting that the described right-of-way, as shown on the attached map, be vacated in accordance with Chapter 11, Title 15.1-482 (b), Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, by the adoption of the attached Ordinance. The Department of Engineering and the Department of Utility have no objections to the proposed vacation on the following condition: 1. That the 25 foot right-of-way be retained as a 25 foot drainage, water/sanitary sewer Easement in order to provide a looping of an eventual waterline between Otterview and Branch Drive. The first reading of the proposed Ordinance was held on December 4, 1990; Public Hearing and Second Reading is scheduled for December 18, 1990. FISCAL IMPACT: ALTERNATIVES: STAFF RECOMMENDATION The County staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors adopt the proposed Ordinance to vacate the referenced right-of- way and instruct the County Attorney in preparation of the Ordinance to reserve an exclusive 25 foot drainage, water/sanitary sewer Easement. ECTFULLY SUBMITTED BY: mold Covey Development and I spections Director APPROVED BY: ,Y Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator --------------------------ACTION VOTE ,,T.. ~~~ n},c Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred To Motion by: Eddy Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers ~r'TES AID BOUNDS DESCRIPTION SIfOWN ON l HAS PLAT REPRESENT A G~O~tP~OS/TE OF DEED ,p-,~E+T~, AID CALCULATED INFORII/AT10N AND DO MOT REFLECT ANAGY:VRATE 80UNDAAY BURVEY. f~ ~Q-!~ OTTERV/EW 6ARDlENS SU80. s>~~ IY `9~ ~9 TAXMAPIVQ 27.05-4 SCALE: i°= 50' VACATE 25 FOOT RIGHT-OF-WAY KNOWN AS "DALLAS ROAD" SHOWN ON THE MAP OF OTTERVIEW GARDENS SUBDIVISION RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 54, PAGE 52 PREPARED BY: ROAMOKE COUNTY ENG/NEER/MQ DEPARTSIENT ~~ '~_~' ~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, DECEMBER 18, 1990 ORDINANCE VACATING 340 FEET OF AN UNIMPROVED TWENTY-FIVE (25) FOOT RIGHT-OF-WAY, REFERRED TO AS "DALLAS ROAD," RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 54, PAGE 52, OTTERVIEW GARDENS SUBDIVISION WHEREAS, F & B Developers Inc., the petitioner, has requested the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia to vacate 340 feet of an unimproved twenty-five (25) foot right-of-way referred to as "Dallas Road," dedicated to the County by plat of Otterview Gardens Subdivision found in Plat Book 54, page 52 in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia; and, WHEREAS, Section 15.1-482 (b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, requires that such action be accomplished by the adoption of an ordinance by the governing body; and, WHEREAS, notice has been given as required by Section 15.1-431 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and a first reading of this ordinance was held on December 4, 1990; and the public hearing and second reading of this ordinance was held on December 18, 1990. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That 340 feet of an unimproved twenty-five (25) foot right-of-way running from Deer Branch Road to Otterview Drive along the lot line between Lots 7 and 13 of Otterview Gardens and Lot 33 of Barrens Village, said road referred to as "Dallas Road" and dedicated to Roanoke County by plat of Otterview Gardens Subdivi- sion found in Plat Book 54 at page 52 in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, be, and hereby is, vacated pursuant to Section 15.1-482 (b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended; and, 2. That as a condition of the adoption of this ordinance, the County reserves and retains a property interest within the twenty- five (25) foot right-of-way for use as a drainage and a water/ sanitary sewer easement in order to provide a looping of an eventual waterline between Otterview and Branch Drive; and, 3. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. 4. That F & B Developers Inc. shall record a certified copy of this ordinance with the Clerk of the Circuit Court and shall pay all fees required to accomplish this transaction. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, DECEMBER 18, 1990 ORDINANCE 121890-16 VACATING THE EASTERN 6-FOOT PORTION OF A 12-FOOT PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT LOCATED ON LOT 20, BLOCR 10, SECTION 3, BEVERLY HEIGHTS NORTH SUBDIVISION WHEREAS, McRae B. Riley has requested the Board of Superv- isors of Roanoke County, Virginia to vacate the eastern 6-foot portion of a 12-foot public utility easement located on Lot 20, Block 10, Section 3, Beverly Heights North Subdivision in the Catawba Magisterial District as shown in Plat Book 8, at page 16 of record in the Clerk's Office of the Roanoke County Circuit Court; and, WHEREAS, Section 15.1-482 (b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, requires that such action be accomplished by the adoption of an ordinance by the governing body; and, WHEREAS, notice has been given as required by Section 15.1- 431 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and a first reading of this ordinance was held on December 4, 1990; and the public hearing and second reading of this ordinance was held on December 18, 1990. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the eastern 6-foot portion of a 12-foot public utility easement located on Lot 20, Block 10, Section 3, Beverly Heights North Subdivision in the Catawba Magisterial District of record in Plat Book 8 at page 16 in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, be, and hereby is, vacated pursuant to Section 15.1-482 (b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended; and, 2. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. 4. That McRae B. Riley shall record a certified copy of this ordinance with the Clerk of the Circuit Court and shall pay all fees required to accomplish this transaction. On motion of Supervisor McGraw to adopt ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Development & Inspections Terry Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning ACTION # ITEM NUMBER ~~!~""~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: December 18, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: To vacate the eastern 6 foot Public Utility Easement located on Lot 20, Beverly Heights North Subdivision, recorded 16, situated in the Catawba Magisterial Dist COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR' S COMMENTS: ~~,,,h,,,~,--G,~,,~C portion of a 12 foot Block 10, Section 3, in Plat Book 8, Page :rict . EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The petitioner, McRae B. Riley, is requesting that the Board of Supervisors vacate a 6 foot portion of a 12 foot wide Public Utility Easement which runs the entire width of his property, by Ordinance, in order to remove the encumbrance on his lot. BACRGROUND Mr. Riley's request involves vacating a 6 foot portion of a 12 foot Public Utility Easement which extends the full width of his property. Mr. Riley has made his request in i~rdfeet h(refer mto extend the rear of his existing garage by attached map). SUMMARY OF INFORMATION Roanoke County staff is requesting that the described Public Utility Easement be vacated in accordance with Chapter il, Title 15.1-482 (b), Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, by the adoption of the attached Ordinance. The County staff and the Public Utility Companies (C & P Telephone, Roanoke Gas Co., Salem Cable TV, and Appalachian Power Co.) have no objections. First Reading of the proposed Ordinance was held on December 4, 1990; Public Hearing and Second Reading is scheduled for December 18, 1990. FISCAL IMPACT: ALTERNATIVES: STAFF RECOMMENDATION County Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors adopt the proposed Ordinanceinstruct the Co my Attorney to pr parebthe Utility Easement and necessary ordinance. SPECTFULL SUBMITTED BY: i ~• Arnold Covey Development and Inspections Director APPROVED BY: ~~ ~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator VOTE ---------------- ACTION Motion by: No Yes Abs Approved ( ) Eddy Denied ( ) Johnson Received ( ) McGraw Referred Nickens TO Robers ~~ SHOWN ON TN/S PLAT REPRESENT A CO~OSITE OF DEE09, Ai'~TES AID BOUNDB DE9CR~'TrON PLATS, Alm CA1.CUlJ1TE0 ~RMATION AND ~ NOT REFLECT AN ACCVRATE @O!lI~ARY SURVEY. • - S' 10° 59' W CREEKWOOD OR/VE 75.00 LOT - 20 BLK-10 SEC- 3 BEVERLY HGTS• NORTH cu SUBDIVISION O I~ s' Pu E. ro ~ VACATED - .12~P.U.E. ~~ L NIO°59 E- T~ Ai/AP ~ 44.03 -4 -33 W o~ C° ~~ - N SCALE: I ~~= ~~ VACATE 6 FOOT PORTION OF A 12-FOOT p1TBLIC OTILITY EASEL~NT LOCATED ON LOT 20, BLOCK 10, SECTION 3, BEVERLY HEIGHTS NORTH, RECORDED IN PLAT BOOR 8, PAGE 16 PREPARED BY: /tpANOKE COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT DATE: NOV. 20-90 ~ l~ ~' ~-~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, DECEMBER 18, 1990 ORDINANCE VACATING THE EASTERN 6-FOOT PORTION OF A 12- FOOT PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT LOCATED ON LOT 20, BLOCK 10, SECTION 3, BEVERLY HEIGHTS NORTH SUBDIVISION WHEREAS, McRae B. Riley has requested the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia to vacate the eastern 6-foot portion of a 12-foot public utility easement located on Lot 20, Block 10, Section 3, Beverly Heights North Subdivision in the Catawba Magisterial District as shown in Plat Book 8, at page 16 of record in the Clerk's Office of the Roanoke County Circuit Court; and, WHEREAS, Section 15.1-482 (b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, requires that such action be accomplished by the adoption of an ordinance by the governing body; and, WHEREAS, notice has been given as required by Section 15.1-431 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and a first reading of this ordinance was held on December 4, 1990; and the public hearing and second reading of this ordinance was held on December 18, 1990. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the eastern 6-foot portion of a 12-foot public utility easement located on Lot 20, Block 10, Section 3, Beverly Heights North Subdivision in the Catawba Magisterial District of record in Plat Book 8 at page 16 in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, be, and hereby is, vacated pursuant to Section 15.1-482(b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended; and, r r ~ ~ .J ~.. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, DECEMBER 18, 1990 ORDINANCE 121890-17 E]CTENDING THE FRANCHISE OF C07L CABLE ROANORE~ INC. TO OPERATE A CABLE TELEVISION SYSTEM IN ROANORE COUNTY FOR A PERIOD OF 60 DAYS WHEREAS, Cox Cable Roanoke, Inc. currently holds a franchise granted by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, to operate a cable television system within portions of Roanoke County as part of a valley-wide cable television system; and WHEREAS, negotiations are currently under way between Cox Cable Roanoke, Inc. and the County of Roanoke, the City of Roanoke and the Town of Vinton, Virginia, for the renewal of this franchise agreement as of January 1, 1991, which negotiations may not be concluded sufficiently prior to such date to permit adoption by the respective governing bodies prior to the expiration of the current franchise agreement on December 31, 1990; and WHEREAS, Cox Cable Roanoke, Inc., is prohibited by federal law from operating a cable television system within any jurisdiction without a franchise agreement or extension as defined by federal law; WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on December 4, 1990, and the second reading of this ordinance was held on December 18, 1990. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That in order to permit Cox Cable Roanoke, Inc. to continue to operate a cable television franchise within the territorial limits of Roanoke County, Virginia, after December 31, 1990, and to prevent any interruption of cable television services to customers of Cox Cable Roanoke, Inc., the franchise of Cox Cable Roanoke, Inc. for the operation of a cable television system within Roanoke County, Virginia, is hereby extended for a period of sixty (60) days beginning at 12:00, midnight, on January 1, 1991, under the same terms and conditions as contained in the existing franchise agreement between Cox Cable Roanoke, Inc. and the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from its passage. On motion of Supervisor McGraw to adopt ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Mary H. A len, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Paul Mahoney, County Attorney .- '~ ACTION NO. ITEM NO. ~ '~~~i AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: December 18, 1990 AGENDA ITEM: Ordinance extending the franchise of Cox Cable Roanoke, Inc. to operate a cable television system in Roanoke County for a period of 60 days COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR' S COMMENTS : ~c~nwr,-~~ `~`~ EXECUTIVE SUMMARY' This ordinance extends the current cable television franchise with Cox Cable Roanoke, Inc. for 60 days from January 1, 1991, while negotiations for a new franchise agreement are being concluded. BACKGROUND' The current fifteen (15) year franchise agreement between Roanoke County, Roanoke City and the Town of Vinton and Cox Cable Roanoke, Inc. for the operation of a cable television system in all three jurisdiction expires on December 31, 1990. The process leading up to renegotiation of the terms of a new franchise agreement with Cox Cable Roanoke, Inc. has been ongoing for many months and fact-to-face negotiations commenced on November 14, 1990. While substantial progress toward a new agreement has been made in the negotiating sessions held up to this date, several more sessions will be necessary before agreement is reached on all major points and a new franchise agreement and ordinance can be com- pleted. It will be a practical impossibility to have these documents prepared and board action taken before December 31, 1990. Federal law precludes Cox Cable Roanoke, Inc. from operating a cable television system in Roanoke County or the other jurisdic- tions without a valid franchise agreement or extension. The first reading of this ordinance was held on December 4, 1990, and the second reading and public hearing is scheduled for December 18, 1990. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The proposed ordinance will satisfy the requirements of federal law for a legally binding franchise agreement between the County of Roanoke and Cox Cable Roanoke, Inc. for the period of time deemed necessary to complete the current negotiations and obtain board approval of a new cable franchise ordinance and ~} ~ ~~~ agreement common to the three participating jurisdictions. The 60 day term of extension provided is short enough to keep pressure on all parties to these negotiations promptly to reach a mutually satisfactory agreement upon the terms of franchise renewal for a substantial term of years. FISCAL IMPACTS• None. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Approve this ordinance and permit Cox Cable Roanoke, Inc. to continue operating its cable television franchise under the current franchise terms. 2. Decline to adopt the ordinance and require Cox Cable Roanoke, Inc. to suspend cable television operations until agreement is reached upon the terms of a new franchise agreement and such agreement is ratified by this board and the other participating governmental bodies. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the approval of the draft ordinance. Respectfully submitted, Q~~.rn Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney Action Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by Eddy Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers Vote No Yes Abs -. '~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, DECEMBER 18, 1990 ORDINANCE EXTENDING THE FRANCHISE OF COX CABLE ROANOKE, INC. TO OPERATE A CABLE TELEVISION SYSTEM IN ROANOKE COUNTY FOR A PERIOD OF 60 DAYS WHEREAS, Cox Cable Roanoke, Inc. currently holds a franchise granted by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, to operate a cable television system within portions of Roanoke County as part of a valley-wide cable television system; and WHEREAS, negotiations are currently under way between Cox Cable Roanoke, Inc. and the County of Roanoke, the City of Roanoke and the Town of Vinton, Virginia, for the renewal of this franchise agreement as of January 1, 1991, which negotiations may not be concluded sufficiently prior to such date to permit adoption by the respective governing bodies prior to the expiration of the current franchise agreement on December 31, 1990; and WHEREAS, Cox Cable Roanoke, Inc., is prohibited by federal law from operating a cable television system within any jurisdiction without a franchise agreement or extension as defined by federal law; WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on December 4, 1990, and the second reading of this ordinance was held on December 18, 1990. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That in order to permit Cox Cable Roanoke, Inc. to continue to operate a cable television franchise within the territorial limits of Roanoke County, Virginia, after December 31, ,. ~ , l~`~o_/~ 1990, and to prevent any interruption of cable television services to customers of Cox Cable Roanoke, Inc., the franchise of Cox Cable Roanoke, Inc. for the operation of a cable television system within Roanoke County, Virginia, is hereby extended for a period of sixty (60) days beginning at 12:00, midnight, on January 1, 1991, under the same terms and conditions as contained in the existing franchise agreement between Cox Cable Roanoke, Inc. and the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from its passage. O~ ROANp~~ ti 'A A Z Z v a 0 150 QQ 18 VEANS $$ SFgQU1CENTENNiP~' A Beautiful Beginning COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE December 20, 1990 C~nixn~~ v~ ~n~trink~ RLL~AMERICA CITY '~I I'' 1979 1989 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS RICHARD W. ROBERS. CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT STEVEN A. MCGRAW. VICE-CHAIRMAN CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT LEE B. EDDY WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT The Honorable L. Douglas Wilder Governor's Office, Third Floor State Capitol Richmond, VA 23219 Dear Governor Wilder: Attached is a copy of Resolution No. 121890-6 opposing the current cost reduction program prescribed by the Virginia Department of Social Services. This resolution was adopted by the Board of Supervisors at their meeting on Tuesday, December 18, 1990 If you need further information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, lv ~~~~ Brenda J. Holton, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Attachment pc: The Honorable Dudley L. Emick, Jr., Senator The Honorable J.~Granger Macfarlane, Senator The Honorable C. Richard Cranwell, House of Delegates The Honorable G. Steven Agee, House of Delegates The Honorable Clifton A. Woodrum, House of Delegates The Honorable A. Victor Thomas, House of Delegates Mr. Howard M. Cullum, Secretary, Health & Human Resources Dr. Mabel G. Wells, Chair, State Board of Social Services Mr. Larry Jackson, Commissioner, Virginia Dept of Soc Serv Mrs. Mary Lou Mullis, Botetourt County Dept of Soc Serv Mr. John Wilcher, Craig County Dept of Social Services Mrs. Barbara Driver, Alleghany-Covington Dept of Soc Serv Mrs. Shirley Hall, Clifton Forge Dept of Social Services Mrs. Betty Lucas, Roanoke County Dept of Social Services Mr. Don Myers, Assistant County Administrator P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24018-0798 (703) 772-2004 O~ ROANp~.~ t` ' « ~ Z z v a /x~ 150 0 0 1 V YEANS 8$ SFSQUICEN7ENN~P~ A Beautiful Beginning COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE Ms. Blanche Dooley 3490 Arthur Road Roanoke, VA 24019 Dear Ms. Dooley: December 19, 1990 At their regular meeting on Tuesday, December 18, County Board of Supervisors unanimously approved Women of the Moose Chapter 1022 for a 50/50 calendar year 1991. The list of specific dates RICHARD W. ROBERS. CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERLAL DISTRICT STEVEN A. MCGRAW. VICE-CHAIRMAN CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT LEE B. EDDY WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERAL DISTRICT 1990, the Roanoke the request of the raffle permit for is attached. The fee has been paid and your receipt is enclosed. You may consider this letter to be your permit, and I suggest it be displayed on the premises where the raffle is to be conducted. The State Code provides that raffle and bingo permits be issued on a calendar-year basis and such permits issued will expire on December 31, 1991. This permit, however, is only valid on the date specified in your application. PLEASE READ YOUR APPLICATION CAREFULLY. YOU HAVE AGREED TO COMPLY WITH STATE AND LOCAL REGULATIONS AND FAILURE TO COMPLY MAY RESULT IN CRIMINAL PENALTIES AND REVOKING OF YOUR PERMIT. YOU MUST FILE A FINANCIAL REPORT BY NOVEMBER 1 OF EACH CALENDAR YEAR. PLEASE SUBMIT A NEW APPLICATION AT LEAST 60 DAYS PRIOR TO DATE OR DATES YOUR ORGANIZATION PLANS TO HOLD BINGO OR RAFFLES. PERMITS EXPIRE ON DECEMBER 31 OF EACH CALENDAR YEAR. If I may be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me at 772-2003. Sincerely, ~. Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisor bjh Enclosures cc: Commissioner of the Revenue Commonwealth Attorney County Treasurer (~nixn~~ of ~n~nnkr ALL-AMERICA CITY III II' 1979 1989 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24018-0798 (703) 772-2004 O~ AOANp~.~ t` ' ~ A 2 °v a 1$ E50 88 SFSQUICEN7ENN~P~ A Beauti~ulBeginning COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE Mr. Paul J. 1741 Elbert Roanoke, VA C~n~tnt~ of ~nttnnke December 19, 1990 Whittemore Drive, S.W. 24018 Dear Mr. Whittemore: AIL~AMERICA CITY 1' I I'' 1979 1989 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS RICHARD W. ROBERS. CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT STEVEN A. MCGRAW. VICE•CHAIRMAN CATAWBA MAGISTERALL. DISTRICT LEE B. EDDY WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT 808 L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT At their regular meeting on Tuesday, December 18, 1990, the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors unanimously approved the request of the Loyal Order of Moose Lodge No. 284 for a 50/50 raffle permit for calendar year 1991. The list of specific dates is attached. The fee has been paid and your receipt is enclosed. You may consider this letter to be your permit, and I suggest it be displayed on the premises where the raffle is to be conducted. The State Code provides that raffle and bingo permits be issued on a calendar-year basis and such permits issued will expire on December 31, 1991. This permit, however, is only valid on the date specified in your application. PLEASE READ YOUR APPLICATION CAREFULLY. YOU HAVE AGREED TO COMPLY WITH STATE AND LOCAL REGULATIONS AND FAILURE TO COMPLY MAY RESULT IN CRIMINAL PENALTIES AND REVOKING OF YOUR PERMIT. YOU MUST FILE A FINANCIAL REPORT BY NOVEMBER 1 OF EACH CALENDAR YEAR. PLEASE SUBMIT A NEW APPLICATION AT LEAST 60 DAYS PRIOR TO DATE OR DATES YOUR ORGANIZATION PLANS TO HOLD BINGO OR RAFFLES. PERMITS EXPIRE ON DECEMBER 31 OF EACH CALENDAR YEAR. If I may be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me at 772-2003. Sincerely, 7~d Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisor bjh Enclosures cc: Commissioner of the Revenue Commonwealth Attorney County Treasurer P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24018-0798 (703) 772-2004 O~ ROANp~.~ ~ '~ A Z z v ~ a 18 E50 88 SFSQUICENTENN~PV A Beauti~ulBeginning COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE C~nun~~ of ~vttnnke December 19, 1990 Mr. James E. Garlick 705 Hemlock Road Salem, VA 24153 Dear Mr. Garlick: AIIdMERICA CITY ''I I~) 1979 1989 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS RICHARD W. ROBERS. CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT STEVEN A. MCGRAW. VICE-CHAIRMAN CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT LEE B. EDDY WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L JOHNSON HOWNS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERALL DISTRICT At their regular meeting on Tuesday, December 18, 1990, the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors unanimously approved the request of the Loyal Order of Moose Lodge No. 284 for a bingo permit for the calendar year 1991 as specified in the application. The fee has been paid and your receipt is enclosed. You may consider this letter to be your permit, and I suggest it be displayed on the premises where the raffle is to be conducted. The State Code provides that raffle and bingo permits be issued on a calendar-year basis and such permits issued will expire on December 31, 1991. This permit, however, is only valid on the date specified in your application. PLEASE READ YOUR APPLICATION CAREFULLY. YOU HAVE AGREED TO COMPLY WITH STATE AND LOCAL REGULATIONS AND FAILURE TO COMPLY MAY RESULT IN CRIMINAL PENALTIES AND REVOKING OF YOUR PERMIT. YOU MUST FILE A FINANCIAL REPORT BY NOVEMBER 1 OF EACH CALENDAR YEAR PLEASE SUBMIT A NEW APPLICATION AT LEAST 60 DAYS PRIOR TO DATE OR DATES YOUR ORGANIZATION PLANS TO HOLD BINGO OR RAFFLES. PERMITS EXPIRE ON DECEMBER 31 OF EACH CALENDAR YEAR. If I may be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me at 772-2003. Sincerely, 7~v1 Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisor bjh Enclosures cc: Commissioner of the Revenue Commonwealth Attorney County Treasurer P.O. BOX 29800 • ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24018-0798 • (703) 772-2004 O~ ROANp,,~~ ~ ,A i 2 L7 ~ 2 ~ :, a~ 18 E50 88 SFSQUICENTENN~pV A Beautiful Beginning COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE Ms. Martha Ferrell 6213 Nell Circle Roanoke, VA 24019 Dear Ms. Ferrell: December 19, 1990 AlL-AMERICA LITY '' I I'' 1979 1989 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS RICHARD W. ROBERS. CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT STEVEN A. MCGRAW. VICE-CHAIRMAN CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT LEE B. EDDY WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT At their regular meeting on Tuesday, December 18, 1990, the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors unanimously approved the request of the Roanoke County School Food Service Chapter for a 50/50 raffle permit for 1991. The raffles are to be conducted at Hidden Valley Junior High School on May 10, 1991, and at Arnold R. Burton School on January 17, 1991, February 21, 1991, and April 18, 1991. The fee has been paid and your receipt is enclosed. You may consider this letter to be your permit, and I suggest it be displayed on the premises where the raffle is to be conducted. The State Code provides that raffle and bingo permits be issued on a calendar-year basis and such permits issued will expire on December 31, 1991. This permit, however, is only valid on the date specified in your application. PLEASE READ YOUR APPLICATION CAREFULLY. YOU HAVE AGREED TO COMPLY WITH STATE AND LOCAL REGULATIONS AND FAILURE TO COMPLY MAY RESULT IN CRIMINAL PENALTIES AND REVOKING OF YOUR PERMIT. YOU MUST FILE A FINANCIAL REPORT BY NOVEMBER 1 OF EACH CALENDAR YEAR. PLEASE SUBMIT A NEW APPLICATION AT LEAST 60 DAYS PRIOR TO DATE OR DATES YOUR ORGANIZATION PLANS TO HOLD BINGO OR RAFFLES. PERMITS EXPIRE ON DECEMBER 31 OF EACH CALENDAR YEAR. If I may be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me at 772-2003. Sincerely, Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisor bjh Enclosures cc: Commissioner of the Revenue Commonwealth Attorney County Treasurer (~nun~~ of ~n~tnvkP P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24018-0798 <703) 772-2004 ~F ROANp,I.~ ti A Z Z ~ . ~ a' 8 E50 8$ SFS(~UICENTENN~P~ A Beautiful Beginning COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE C~nun~~ of ~n~t~tnke December 19, 1990 Dr. Fred P. Roessel, Jr. Executive Director MHS of Roanoke Valley 920 South Jefferson Street Roanoke, VA 24016-4494 Dear Dr. Roessel: All-AMERICA LITY 1'I f'/ 1979 1989 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS RICHARD W. ROBERS. CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT STEVEN A. MCGRAW. VICE-CHAIRMAN CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT LEE B. EDDY WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT This is to advise that at their meeting on Tuesday, December 18, 1990, the Board of Supervisors voted unanimously to ratify the appointment of Mrs. Harriette Shivers as an at-large member of the Mental Health Services of the Roanoke Valley Community Services Board. On behalf of the supervisors and the citizens of Roanoke County, please convey to Mrs. Shivers our sincere thanks and appreciation for her willingness to accept this reappointment. Sincerely, Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors MHA/bj h cc: Mrs. Harriette Shivers Clerk, Roanoke City Council Clerk, Salem City Council Clerk, Botetourt County Board of Supervisors Clerk, Vinton Town Council Clerk, Craig County Board of Supervisors P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24018-0798 • (703) 772-2004 0~ ROANp,1.~ r; ' A 9 Z v •~ a Q 150 QQ 1$ YEARS 8$ SFSQUICENTENNIP~ A Beautiful Beginning COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE Mr. R. Vincent Reynolds 4229 Toddsbury Drive Vinton, VA 24179 Dear Mr. Reynolds: December 19, 1990 ALL~AMERIG CITY ''I I~' 1979 1989 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS RICHARD W. ROBERS. CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT STEVEN A. MCGRAW. VICE-CHAIRMAN CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT LEE B. EDDY WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOWNS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT This is to advise that at their meeting held on Tuesday, December 18, 1990, the Board of Supervisors voted unanimously to appoint you as a member of the Grievance Panel for a two-year term beginning September 10, 1990, and ending September 10, 1992. State law provides that any person elected, re-elected, appointed, or re-appointed to any body be furnished a copy of the Freedom of Information Act; your copy is enclosed. We are also sending you a copy of the Conflicts of Interest Act. Both of these acts were amended by the Virginia General Assembly in July, 1989. On behalf of the Supervisors and the citizens of Roanoke County, please accept our sincere thanks and appreciation for your willingness to accept this appointment. Very truly yours, ~. Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors bjh Enclosures pc: Mr. D. Keith Cook, Director, Human Resources C~vixn~~ of ~nttnnk~ P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24018-0798 (703) 772-2004 O~ ~OANp~-~ ti 'M A Z z ~ a 18 E50 $8 SFSQUICENTENN~P~' A Beauq fu/Beginning COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE Ms. Lessa Dalton 23406 Stonehenge Square Roanoke, VA 24018 C~v~tnt~ of ~v~tnuke ALI~AMERIU CITY 1' I ~'' 1979 1989 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS RICHARD W. ROBERS, CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT STEVEN A. MCGRAW. VICE•CHAIRMAN CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT LEE B. EDDY WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERLAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT December 19, 1990 Dear Ms. Dalton: The Board of Supervisors have asked me to express on their behalf their sincere appreciation for your previous service to the Library Board. Citizens so responsive to the needs of their community and willing to give of themselves and their time are indeed all too scarce. This is to advise that at their meeting held on Tuesday, December 18, 1990, the Board of Supervisors voted unanimously to reappoint you as a member of the Library Board representing the Cave Spring Magisterial District for another four-year term. Your term will expire on December 31, 1994. It is necessary that you take an oath of office before the Clerk of the Roanoke County Circuit Court. This oath must be administered prior to your participation on this Committee. Please telephone Mrs. Elizabeth Stokes, Clerk, at 387-6208, as soon as possible and arrange to have the oath administered. State law provides that any person elected, re-elected, appointed to any body be furnished a copy of the Freedom of Information Act; your copy is enclosed. We are also sending you a copy of the Conflict of Interest Act. Both of these acts were amended by the Virginia General Assembly in July, 1989. On behalf of the Supervisors and the citizens of Roanoke County, please accept our sincere thanks and appreciation for your willingness to accept this appointment. Sincerely, ~- Mary Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors MHA/bjh Enclosures pc: Mr. George Garretson, Director, Roanoke County Libraries The Honorable Elizabeth Stokes, Clerk, Circuit Court P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24018-0798 • (703) 772-2004 O~ ROANp~.~ ti 'A ~ Z o ,. e50 $$ SFSQUICENTENNIP~' A BeautifulBeginnin~ COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE C~nixn~~ of ~nttnnkr Mr. James A. Conner 7045 Irondale Circle, Roanoke, VA 24019 Dear Mr. Conner: December 19, 1990 N.W. ALL-AMERICA CITY I I I I 1979 1989 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS RICHARD W. ROBERS. CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERALL. DISTRICT STEVEN A. MCGRAW. VICE-CHAIRMAN CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT LEE B. EDDY WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOWNS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT This is to advise that at their meeting held on Tuesday, December 18, 1990 the Board of Supervisors voted unanimously to appoint you as a member of the Recycling Advisory Committee to represent the business community. State law provides that any person elected, re-elected, appointed, or re-appointed to any body be furnished a copy of the Freedom of Information Act; your copy is enclosed. We are also sending you a copy of the Conflicts of Interest Act. Both of these acts were amended by the Virginia General Assembly in July, 1989. On behalf of the Supervisors and the citizens of Roanoke County, please accept our sincere thanks and appreciation for your willingness to accept this appointment. Very truly yours, rn~~ ~ . Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors bjh Enclosures pc: Mr. Gardner Smith, Director, General Services P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24018-0798 (703) 772-2004 Mr. Eddy: I have found a citizen from the business community to fill the remaining appointment to the Recycling Committee: Ms. April Yow Property Manager Edinburgh Square Foundation (Home Address) 129 Hershberger Road #103 Roanoke, Virginia 24012 Phone No: 265-2505 (unlisted at home) 366-1888 (business) Ms. Yow is active on the Roanoke Valley Apartment and and Business Property Council. I have talked with her and she is willing to serve and is knowledgeable on recycling. Mary Allen 12/12/90 LEGAL NOTICE ROANORE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, December 18, 1990, in the Community Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, Roanoke, VA, on a Special Exception Request of Robert Woodward to permit the sale of used cars on the premises at 3306 Brambleton Avenue, in the Cave Spring Magisterial District. A copy of this application is available for inspection in the Department of Planning and Zoning, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, Roanoke, VA. Dated: November 27, 1990 ~. Mary H. Allen, Clerk Please publish in the evening edition of the Roanoke Times & World-News Tuesday, December 4, 1990 Tuesday, December 11, 1990 Direct the bill for publication to: Robert Woodward c/o Edward Natt PO Box 20068 Roanoke, VA 24018 (703) 774-1197 SEND AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION TO: ROANORE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT P.O. BOX 29800, ROANORE, VA 24018 LEGAL NOTICE ROANORE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, December 18, 1990, in the Community Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, Roanoke, VA, on a Special Exception Request of Rajesh Desai to operate a home for adults, located at 7656 Williamson Road, in the Hollins Magisterial District. A copy of this application is available for inspection in the Department of Planning and Zoning, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, Roanoke, VA. Dated: November 27, 1990 Mary H. Al en, Clerk Please publish in the evening edition of the Roanoke Times & World-News Tuesday, December 4, 1990 Tuesday, December 11, 1990 Direct the bill for publication to: Rajesh Desai Budget Motor Lodge 7656 Williamson Road Roanoke, VA 24019 (703) 366-7671 SEND AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION TO: ROANORE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT P.O. BOX 29800, ROANORE, VA 24018 L E G A L N O T I C E Notice is hereby given to all, interested persons that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at their 7:00 p.m. session on Tuesday, DECEMBER 18, 1990, in the Community Room at the Roanoke County Administrator Center, 3738 Brambleton Avenue S. W. on the petition of the F&B DEVELOPERS requesting vacation of 140 FEET OF AN EXISTING UNIMPROVED RIGHT- OF-WAY KNOWN AS "DALLAS ROAD", SHOWN ON MAP OF OTTERVIEW GARDENS SUBDIVISION. A copy of the documents related to this request may be examined in the office of the Department of Development and Inspections, located at the Roanoke County Administration Center. Given under my hand this 21ST DAY OF NOVEMBER, 1990. l~ Mary H. Allen, Clerk to the Board Roanoke County Board of Supervisors PLEASE PUBLISH IN THE EVENING EDITION OF THE ROANUKE TIMES AND WORLD NEWS ON: TUESDAY, DECEMBER 4, 1990 TUESDAY, DECEMBER 11, 1990 Direct the Bill for Publication to: F&B Developers 4139 Brandon Avenue S. W. Roanoke, Va. 24018 LEGAL NOTICE ROANORE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, December 18, 1990, in the Community Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, Roanoke, VA, on the petition of Hollins College Corporation to rezone 0.67 acre from B-1 to B-2 to operate a restaurant, located at 7770 Williamson Road, Hollins Magisterial District. A copy of this application is available for inspection in the Department of Planning and Zoning, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, Roanoke, VA. Dated: November 27, 1990 Mary H. All Clerk Please publish in the evening edition of the Roanoke Times & World-News Tuesday, December 4, 1990 Tuesday, December 11, 1990 Direct the bill for publication to: Hollins College Corporation c/o Woods, Rogers & Hazelgrove PO Box 720 Roanoke, VA 24004-0720 (703) 982-4262 SEND AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION TO: ROANORE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT P.O. BOX 29800, ROANOKE, VA 24018 V LEGAL NOTICE ROANORE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, December 18, 1990, in the Community Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, Roanoke, VA, on the petition of Steve Brown to rezone 7.8 acres from R-1 to R-3 to construct townhouses, located on Hardy Road near Wolf Creek, Vinton Magisterial District. A copy of this application is available for inspection in the Department of Planning and Zoning, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, Roanoke, VA. Dated: November 27, 1990 ~) Mary H. Allen, Clerk Please publish in the evening edition of the Roanoke Times & World-News Tuesday, December 4, 1990 Tuesday, December 11, 1990 Direct the bill for publication to: Steve Brown c/o Shanks Associates 313 Luck Avenue Roanoke, VA 24011 (703) 343-6685 SEND AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION TO: ROANORE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT P.O. BOX 29800, ROANORE, VA 24018 LEGAL NOTICE ROANORE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, December 18, 1990, in the Community Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, Roanoke, VA, on the proposed amendment to the 1985 Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan. This amendment will append the 1985 Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan by incorporating into the plan the analysis, conclusions and recommendations contained in the September 1990 Roanoke River Corridor Study, prepared by the Roanoke River Corridor Council. A copy of this application is available for inspection in the Department of Planning and Zoning, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, Roanoke, VA. Dated: November 27, 1990 m a~-~-~.-- fig/. Q-~~~,,,,J Mary H. Alen, Clerk Please publish in the evening edition of the Roanoke Times & World-News Tuesday, December 4, 1990 Tuesday, December 11, 1990 Direct the bill for publication to: Roanoke County Board of Supervisors PO Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 (703) 772-2005 SEND AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION TO: ROANORE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT P.O. BOX 29800, ROANORE, VA 24018 I ~,~ PUBLIC NOTICE ~ ~`~ ~~ ~-RO . Please be advised that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, at its meeting on December 18, 1990, at the Roanoke County Administration Center, 3738 Brambleton Avenue, Roanoke, Virginia, at the evening session beginning at 7:00 p.m. will hold a public hearing on the following: ORDINANCE EXTENDING THE FRANCHISE OF COX CABLE ROANOKE, INC. TO OPERATE A CABLE TELEVISION SYSTEM IN ROANOKE COUNTY FOR A PERIOD OF 60 DAYS All members of the public interested in the matter set forth above may appear and be heard at the time and place aforesaid. Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney Roanoke County, Virginia Publish on the following dates in the morning edition: Tuesday, December 11, 1990 Send invoice to: Board of Supervisors P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 ATTENTION: MRS. MARY ALLEN 11-26-90 Tim Gubala called and said that~John Clarke, Vice President, Dominion Bank, is confirmed to come to Dec 18 board meeting, at 3 p.m. meeting to talk about Metro Basketball Tournament. Said he mentioned it to you earlier and Mr. Hodge told him to call and ask to come. Brenda