The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1/8/1991 - RegularAN + F ~ a ~ '' Au-AMERICA CRY ~ ~ 18 (~ 88 tES0U1CENTEM~~' ~ ~ ~ n ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ACTION AGENDA JANUARY 8, 1991 Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meeting. Regular meetings are held on the second Tuesday and the fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public hearings are held at 7:00 p.m on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.) 1. Roll Call. ALL PRESENT AT 3:01 P.M. 2. Irnocation: John Chambliss Assistant County Administrator 3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag. B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS ECH REQUESTED EXECUTIVE SESSION ON LEGAL MATTER CONCERNING LANDFILL C. PROCIAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS, AND AWARDS i 1. Resolution of Appreciation to Richard W. Robers for his chairmanship of the Board of Supervisors. R-1891-1 BLJ TO ADOPT RESO - URC RESO, PLAQUE AND "SMART CAR" PRESENTED TO RWR 2. Presentation of Certificates of Appreciation from the U. S. Air Force Recruiting squadron. CERTIFICATES PRESENTED BY LT. COL. CARL M. RYDALL AND SSGT. SHAWN BULLMAN, 3534 U.S. AIR FORCE RECRUITING SQUADRON EXPRESSING APPRECIATION FOR BOARD SUPPORT OF THOSE SERVING IN PERSIAN GULF. D. NEW BUSINESS 1. Presentation on Metro Basketball Tournament PRESENTED BY JOHN CIARK, REGIONAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER, DOMINION BANK, ASKED FOR FINANCIAL SUPPORT FROM ROANOKE COUNTY. BLJ MOTION THAT ECH BRING BACK A STAFF RECOMII~NDATION UW 2. Appointments of Board of Supervisors memberships on Committees, Commissions and Boards. A -~ ! ~'''~ l -~ 2 HCN MOTION TO APPROVE AFTER REMOVING ROANOKE VALLEY COOPERATION COMMITTEE, AND APPOINTING SAM AS LIAISON TO VACO 3. Report on Dog Ordinance. LBE MOTION TO BRING BACK ORDINANCE CHANGING # OF a DOGS ALLOWED IN RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT FROM 2 TO 3. AYES-LBE NAYS-RWR,BLJ,HCN,SAM HCN MOTION TO APPROVE STAFF RECOII~IlVIENDATION TO MAKE NO CHANGE -MOTION WITHDRAWN PMM TO BRING BACK REPORT ON CAT ORDINANCE 4. Resolution repealing resolution 12390-8 and adoption of the Drainage Standards Section of the Design and Construction Standards Manual. R-1391-3 LBE MOTION TO ADOPT RESO URC E. REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS NONE F. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS NONE G. REQUEST FOR PUBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING OF REZONING ORDINANCES NONE H. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance authorizing acceptance and acquisition of surplus real estate adjacent to Fort Lewis Elementary School and authorizing corneyance to the Commonwealth of Virginia. (CONTINUED FROM DECEMBER 18, 1990.) 3 HCN MOTION TO APPROVE 1ST READING URC 2ND - 1/22/91 I. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES NONE J. APPOINTMENTS 1. Board of Zoning Appeals HCN NOMINATED LEON MCGHEE TO 4-YEAR PERM EXPIRING 6/30/94 2. Building Code Board of Adjustments and Appeals HCN NOMINATED WII.MORE T, LEFFELL TO ANOTHER 4-YEAR TERM EXPIRING 12/12/94. 3. Grievance Panel 4. Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission K. CONSENT AGENDA ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY. R-1891-4 4 S Q~ISI'Igfld ~g Z~ QI~I~ 'ITIId~' ?IO H~?I~'L1I III I~IIO~$ QZ(lOHS ~~sas ~ a~slna~ ~t •r~~sas ao~ss~ a~axo~~x J.nos~ Q~IS~ (Z) 'O1~u1~iOZ ?IO ~~IZOd - ~~?IOdri~ Q'it1OHS OHAA I~u SI L1I~'IgO?Id '(RIO ~SIOI~I ?Id.L~I?I.LS ri0 OI~I?IOAA - L1ILQd '(I?IO ~~I~I~'SIf1I~i riO ~.L~QdIl ?IO3 L1IL1Id Q~IS~ (I) ~~QQ~ 2IOSIA2I~d11S sx~8~~ ax~og 3o s~Ixlnaru a~ ssxoa~x •~ •sa;e~aoss~ wniutwopuo~ aui~aagwiZ wo.~~ s;uawasea uieap w.~o;s pue .~a;eM ~.~antias ~e;iues ~o uor;euoQ •g •wa;s~S ~epuoaaS uoi;e;.~odsue.~Z ~o ;uaw;.~edaQ eiui~aiA ay; o;u~ aia.~t~ ~fa[[nA "nopeaL~I 3o aaue;daaa~ •S •wa;s~fS ~epuoaaS uoi;e;.~odsue.~Z ~o ;uaw;.~edaQ e~ui~,~iA ay; o;ut ;.~no~ ~fpi3 pue aueZ ueTge.~~ 3o aaue;daaae ao3 ;sanbag •~ a'~-I68I-~ P'ti-I68I-?I a'ti-T68I-2I 9'~-I68I-2I •wa;s~fS ~epuoaaS uor;e;.~odsuers ~o ;uaw;aedaQ eiut~.~rA ay; o;ui anr.~Q ~~ipun~ pue aia.~t~ IIIH aPeiO 3o aaue;daaae so3 ;sanbag •~ •aa;;iwwo~ ~osinp~ ~u~ia~faag pue uoissiwwo~ ~uiuueid ay; o; s;uaw;utodd~ as;;iwwo~ ~o uor;euia~uo~ •z 0661 `b aagwaaaQ - sa;nury~ 30 (etio.~dd~ •I e'b-I68I-~ ~2I[1 OS~ J.dO(I~ OZ I~IOI.LOLII I~L~H IN BLUE PAGES. (3) ASKED FOR REPORT ON EXTENDING ALLIED SIGNAL SEWER LINES TO DIXIE CAVERNS. ECH WILL BRING BACK REPORT ON 1/22/91. (4) ASKED WHY CHECKS FOR TAX PAYMENTS, ETC. ARE MADE OUT TO ALFRED ANDERSON, TREASURER, INSTEAD OF COUNTY OF ROANOKE. REPORT WILL BE BROUGHT BACK ON 1/22/91. (5) ASKED FOR UPDATE ON VEHICLE REPLACEMENT POLICY. ECH WILL BRING REPORT BACK DURING BUDGET PROCESS. (~ ASKED WHETHER LETTER WENT OUT TO BUSINESSES REGARDING SMOKING ORDINANCE. AMG PREPARED DRAFT AND NOW BEING RED BY PMM. (7) ANNOUNCED RECYCLING ADVISORY COMiVHT1~E IS COMPLETE. SUPERVISOR TOHNSON: ASKED THAT INFORIVIATION ON COUNTY AUDITOR AND LEAF COLLECTION BE ADDED TO BOARD RETREAT AGENDA ON 1/11/91. SUPERVISOR MCGRAW: (1) ANNOUNCED VACO/VML COOPERATION COI~IlVH1'1'EE MET ON 1/3 TO DISCUSS JOINT VENTURE. (2) ADVISED THAT VACO/VMI, TASK FORCE ON ANNEXATION WII,L MEET ON 1/17 IN RICHMOND. SUPERVISOR 1VICKENS: (1) COMPLI1ViENTED THOSE RESPONSIBLE FOR LEAF COLLECTION -DID NOT RECEIVE ANY COMPIAINTS THIS YEAR, (2) ASKED FROM A REPORT FROM COMII~IISSIONER OF REVENUE REGARDING EFFORTS IN TRACKING THOSE WHO DO NOT PURCHASE COUNTY DECALS. SUPERVISOR ROBERS: (1) ANNOUNCED BUD KONRAD FROM G.E. HAS BEEN ADDED TO SMART HIGHWAY CO1bIlVIIZTEE. (2) ADVISED THAT PMM AND HE WOULD MEET WITH RESIDENTS IN GREEN VALLEY TO DISCUSS "TOO-TALL BUILDING" ON RT. 419. (3) ASKED FOR A REPORT ON COMPARISON OF COSTS BETWEEN BLUE CROSS-BLUE SHIELD AND CCN. ECH TO BRING BACK REPORT AT 2/12/91 BUDGET WORK SESSION. SAM ASKED THAT SURVEY BE SENT TO EMPLOYEES BEFORE ANY CHANGES TO HEALTH CARE. 6 M. CITIZENS' COMII~NTS ANI~ COb'IlVILJNICATIONS 1. Burton Claxton, President of Crystal Creek Homeowners Association and Civic League. ASKED FOR BOARD SUPPORT FOR OPPOSITION TO ROAD IIVIPROVEMENTS TO CRYSTAL CREEK DRIVE. STAFF TO BRING BACK REPORT ON 1/22/91 ON HISTORY AND PROGRESS ON IIVIPROVEMENTS. BOARD CONSENSUS TO WAIT UNTIL AFTER pUB~C BRING ON 1/24 TO MAKE DECISION. 2. ED KOHINKE, 6913 BRADSHAW ROAD, SALEM SUGGESTED THAT RECOGNITION BE GIVEN TO DON TERP AND CAM FOR EFFORTS OPPOSING CONSOLIDATION. N. REPORTS RWR MOTION TO RECEIVE AND FILE - UW 1. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance 2. General Fund Unappropriated Balance 3. Board Contingency Fund O. EXEC'i71'IVE SESSION pursuant to the Code of Virginia section 2.1-344 A (7) to discuss a legal matter concerning landfills and another local government. HCN MOTION AT 4:40 P.M. URC I'. CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE SESSION R-1891-5 HCN MOTION AT 531 P.M. URC . EVENING SESSION (7.00 P.M ALL PRESENT AT 7:01 P.M. Q. WORK SESSION 1. Joint Work Session with the Planning Commission on the Capital Improvement Plan. HCN: WHY WERE ALL PROJECTS FROM PARKS AND REC MASTER PLAN NOT INCLUDED? BLJ: 11~IAINTENANCE AND REPAIR SHOULD BE ONGOING EXPENSE INCLUDED IN BUDGET AND NOT CIP~ HCIV,BLJ,SAM: NO NEW PARK LANDS UNTIL CURRENT PARKS ARE COMPLETED. CONSENSUS: 117AINTENANCE AND REPORT SHOULD BE FIRST PRIORITY BEFORE CAPITAL PURCHASES. LBE: SCHOOL PROJECTS SHOULD BE FUNDED WITH LITERARY FUND LOANS. SAM: SENIOR CENTER SHOULD BE CENTRALLY LOCATED NOT NECESSARILY IN SOi;ITHWEST AREA. s LBE: ASKED FOR ANALYSIS OF LEASE-PURCHASE VERSUS OTHER FUND METHODS. NEED JUSTIFICATION FOR NEW CAVE SPRING HIGH SCHOOL. BIT : NEED TO DETERMINE FUNDING METHODOLOGY FOR WATER, SEWER AND LANDFILL. NEED ONGOING LIST OF STAFF COSTS FOR STARTUP OF LANDFILL. R. ADJOURNMENT to 1:00 P.M. Friday, January 11, 1991 at Hollins College for the purpose of a retreat. HCN MOTION TO ADJOURN TO 1/11/91 AT 9:40 P.M. - UW 9 • '' ,~ "" ~F ALL-AMERICA CCTV ~ 9 •~ ' , ~ ~n~i~~ ~ ~~ ~~~~~ ~ 18 ~ 88 .9.8.9 +E~~UICENTENN~' ~ Burd~ul8t~~e~eg ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA JANUARY 8, 1991 Re lar Welcome to the Roanoke County Board ° and t he l fourth Tu sday atg3.00 meetings are held on the second Tuesday p•in. Public hearings are held at 7:00 p.m on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. A• OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.) 1• Roll Call. 2, Invocation: John Chambliss Assistant County Administrator 3, Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag. B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS C. PROCIAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS, AND AWARDS 1• Resolution of Appreciation to Richard W. Robers for his chairmanship of the Board of Supervisors. i 2. Presentation of Certificates of Appreciation from the U. S. Air Force Recruiting Squadron. D. NEW BUSINESS 1. Presentation on Metro $asketball Tournament 2. Appointments of Board of Supervisors memberships on Committees, Commissions and Boards. 3, Report on Dog Ordinance. 4. Resolution repealing resolution 12390-8 and adoption of the Drainage Standards Section of the Design and Construction Standards Manual. E. REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS F. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS G, REQUEST FOR PUBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING OF REZONING ORDINANCES H. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance authorizing acceptance and acquisition of surplus real estate adjacent to Fort Lewis Elementary School and authorizing conveyance to the Commonwealth of Virginia. (CONTINUED FROM DECEMBER 18, 1990.) I. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 2 J. APPOINTMENTS 1. Board of Zoning Appeals 2. Building Code Board of Adjustments and Appeals 3. Grievance Panel , 4. Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission K. CONSENT AGENDA ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WII.L BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY. 1. Approval of Minutes -December 4, 1990 2. Confirmation of Committee Appointments to the Planning Commission and Recycling Advisory Committee. 3. Request for acceptance of Glade Hill Circle and Cundiff Drive into the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System. 4. Request for acceptance of Arabian Lane and Filly Court into the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System. 3 5. Acceptance of Meadow Valley Circle into the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System. 6. Donation of sanitary sewer, water and storm drain easements from Timberline Condominium Associates. L. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS M. CITIZENS' COMII~NTS AND COINIlVIUNICATIONS 1. Burton Claxton, President of Crystal Creek Homeonwers Association and Civic League. N. REPORTS 1. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance 2. General Fund Unappropriated Balance 3. Board Contingency Fund O. EXECUTIVE SESSION pursuant to the Code of Virginia section 2.1-344 A P. CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE SESSION EVENING SESSION 7:00 P.M.~ Q. WORK SESSION 4 i 1. Joint Work Session with the Planning Commission on the Capital Improvement Plan. R ADJOiTRNMENT to 1:00 P.M. Friday, January 11, 1991 at Hollins College for the purpose of a retreat. 5 ,. , AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JANUARY 8, 1991 RESOLUTION 1891-1 OF APPRECIATION TO RICHARD W. ROWERS FOR HIS CHAIRMANSHIP OF THE ROANORE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS FOR TAE YEAR 1990 BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia as follows: WHEREAS, Richard W. Robers has served with distinction as Vice Chairman of the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors in 1988 and 1989 and as Chairman in 1990; and WHEREAS, Mr. Robers' leadership provided the initiative in establishing the Economic Bridges program and the Smart Highway program which will bring needed economic growth to our area; and WHEREAS, Mr. Robers has devoted countless hours to serving the residents of Roanoke County during his tenure as Vice Chairman and Chairman and as a member of the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, on behalf of all citizens of Roanoke County, does hereby extend its gratitude and appreciation to Richard W. Robers for his many significant contributions to the County as Vice Chairman and Chairman of the Board of Supervisors, and FURTHER, the Board expresses its hope that Mr. Robers will continue his dedication, involvement, and concern for the citizens of Roanoke County. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt resolution, and r ~ r carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, Nickens, McGraw NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Resolutions of Appreciation File D. Keith Cook, Director, Human Resources c-~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JANUARY 8, 1991 RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION TO RICHARD W. ROBERS FOR HIS CHAIRMANSHIP OF THE ROANORE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS FOR THE YEAR 1990 BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia as follows: WHEREAS, Richard W. Robers has served with distinction as Vice Chairman of the Roanoke County Boartl of Supervisors in 1988 and 1989 and as Chairman in 1990, and WHEREAS, Mr. Robers' leadership provided the initiative in establishing the Economic Bridges program and the Smart Highway program which will bring needed economic growth to our area, and WHEREAS, Mr. Robers has devoted countless hours to serving the residents of Roanoke County during his tenure as chairman and Vice Chairman and as a member of the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors • of Roanoke County, Virginia, on behalf of all citizens of Roanoke County, does hereby extend its gratitude and appreciation to Richard W. Robers for his many significant contributions to the County as Vice Chairman and Chairman of the Board of Supervisors, and FURTHER, the Board expresses its hope that Mr. Robers will continue his dedication, involvement, and concern for the citizens of Roanoke County. ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER ~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: January 8, 1991 AGENDA ITEM: Presentation on Metro Basketball Tournament COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION The Roanoke Valley will host the Metro Basketball Tournament on March 7 - 9, 1991. The tournament is a real drawing card for the Roanoke Valley and will provide a financial boost for the motels, merchants and other businesses in the community. John Clark, Regional Executive Officer, Dominion Bank, is assisting in planning the tournament, and has asked to make a presentation to the board members. He is making similar presentations to other governments in the Roanoke Valley. ~/~ L,a,-' ~~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator -----------------------------------r---------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Eddy Received ( ) Johnson Referred ( ) McGraw To ( ) Nickens Robers A_1891_2 ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER -.Z AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE•COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: January 8, 1991 AGENDA ITEM: Ratification and Appointments of Board of Supervisor memberships on Committees, Commissions and Boards COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION Attached is the 1991 proposed appointments to various committees, commissions and boards. The only changes from the 1990 list is the removal of the Consolidation Negotiating Committee which is no longer necessary and the addition•of the 1990 appointment of Supervisor McGraw to the Cablevision Negotiating Subcommittee. There are several committees on which the chairman automatically serves and those changes have been made also. All other appointments have set terms. Listed below is a new appointment request from the Virginia Association of Counties. County Liaison to VACo James D. Campbell, Executive Director of the Virginia Association of Counties has also requested that each County designate a Supervisor to serve as a liaison to VACo (see attached letter). This would be the appropriate time for the board, to make this appointment. RECOMMENDATION' It is recommended that the attached list of proposed appointments be ratified by the Board of Supervisors and that the Board appoint a supervisor to serve as liaison to the Virginia Association of Counties. -..Z Submitted by: Approved by: Mary H. Allen Elmer C. Hodge Clerk to the Board County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved (xJ Motion by: Harry C. Nickens No Yes Abs Denied ( ) to approve after removing Eddy x Received ( ) Roanoke Valley Cooperation Johnson x Referred ( ) committee and agpointinct McGraw x To ( ) Steven A.~McGraw as Liaison Nickens x to Virginia Association of Robers x Counties cc: File Committee Book Board Members BOARD OF SUPERVISORS COMMITTEE ASSIGNMENTS 1991 LEE B. EDDY -- Fifth Planning District Commission (3-year term expires 6/30/93) -- Resource Authority (4-year term expires 12/31/93) -- Recycling Advisory Committee BOB L. JOHNSON -- Audit Committee -- Regional Airport Commission (4-year term expires 2/10/94) -- Resource Authority (4-year term expires 12/31/93) STEVEN A. MCGRAW -- State Emergency Services Committee (As Chairman) -- Regional Partnership (As Chairman) -- Cablevision Negotiating Subcommittee -- Cablevision Committee -- Resource Authority (initial term expires 12/31/91) -- Liaison to Virginia Association of Counties DR. HARRY C. NICRENS -- Resource Authority (4-year term expires 12/31/93) -- Social Services Board (4-year term expires 12/31/93) -- Cablevision Committee -- Transportation and Safety Commission (4-year term expires 4/1/91) -- Court Community Corrections Policy Board (3-year term expires 12/31/91) RICHARD W. ROBERS -- Audit Committee -- Regional Airport Commission (4-year term expires 2/10/91) -- Western Virginia Development Corporation -- Clean Valley Committee (2-year term expires 6/30/91) -- Resource Authority (initial term expires 12/31/91) .-. ~ =,,.~, G l AMENDED• BOARD OF SUPERVISORS COMMITTEE ASSIGNMENTS 1991 LEE B. EDDY -- Fifth Planning District Commission (3-year term expires 6/30/93) -- Resource Authority (4-year term expires 12/31/93) -- Recycling Advisory Committee BOB L. JOHNSON -- Audit Committee -- Regional Airport Commission (4-year term expires 2/10/94) -- Resource Authority (4-year term expires 12/31/93) STEVEN A. MCGRAW -- State Emergency Services Committee (As Chairman) -- Regional Partnership (As Chairman) -- Cablevision Negotiating Subcommittee -- Cablevision Committee -- Roanoke Valley Cooperation Committee -- Resource Authority (initial term expires 12/31/91) DR. HARRY C. NICRENS -- Resource Authority (4-year term expires 12/31/93) -- Social Services Board (4-year term expires 12/31/93) -- Cablevision Committee -- Transportation and Safety Commission (4-year term expires 4/1/91) -- Court Community Corrections Policy Board (3-year term expires 12/31/91) RICHARD W. ROBERS -- Audit Committee -- Regional Airport Commission (4-year term expires 2/10/91) -- Western Virginia Development Corporation -- Clean Valley Committee (2-year term expires 6/30/91) -- Roanoke Valley Cooperation Committee -- Resource Authority (initial term expires 12/31/91) ~ - , . ~~ '' W D. "Berry" Gray Richmond County Steven A. McGraw Ann L. Hess Roanoke County Montgomery County 3r..sYt -.fir :/a.r J.~o~y-~ Kathleen K. Seefeldt E. Virgil Sampson, Jr. Pence William County Scott County 9nr,.rdo[e ire-~:..b~.r Martha V. Pennino Fairfax County CONNECTING COUNTY GOVERNMENTS SINCE 1935 sPfya.. cw.< <,p~ ~,ma~ 1001 East Broad Street, Suite LL20 Wilham E. Belvin Gloucester County Richmond, Virginia 23219 (804)788-6652 `•~t~°"~'°•`R~°nr'~°'~~°~~ John J. Purcell Fax: (804) 788-0083 Louisa County JP49:ort :~.rre .~ p.~~~rirs Harry G. ..:.iL~ el Chesterfieldi,uunty TO: County Chief Administrative Ofiiccs ~ '" Anthony P Mehfoud ~ Henrico County .~~~ .w,,,~~~ FROM: James D. Campbell, CAE,Executive Director Marvin WScott Prince Edward County /-~~~ Peggy R. 1Viley RE: County Liasions to VACo Greensville County ~ J~~Mi hae uayi°`° DATE: December 26, 1990 Campbe6 County ~~ J.r9P<p~~~..~ Robert J. Schwaztz As you meet for your organizational meeting in 1991, Orange Counry s we ask that each county designate a Supervisor to serve as .~,, P~n~eCvil,i~~ty ~ its VACo liaision to interact directly with your respective S O regional representative on the VACo Board of Directors. ffordC unty ~~~ Ellen M. Bozman Arlington County Please advise this office of your designee as soon as Katherine K. Hanley fairfaxCounty possible. Gerr} W Hyland Fairfax County . Audrey Moore Fairfax County Mary Mazgaret Whipple Arlington County 4L.~ 9P~..~.a.r ~'«,s R "Pete" Dunnin Jr . . g, . Clazke County Hazper R. Wagner Bath County 9m.~iP~e,..~..d iros (sli'ardUS G. "Gus Fo[ry Franklin County Wanda C. "Wendy" Wingo Botetourt County 5P G/ .R,r°ti..~ Mason A. Vaughan, Sr. Pulaski County ..<Rfya...~~/ FiPge..~.a.r..a~. William H. H. Blevins Smyth County G. Fred Dotson 1Vise County b_4w ~ 'J~.w. Jack D. Edwards James City County Harry G. King Prince George County d+e~.sv/Coave( C. Flippo Hicks ..~ -.2/ VIRGINIA ASSOCIATION OF COUNTIES ACTION NO. ~-~ ITEM NUMBER EGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF NISTRATIONSCENTER NOKE COUNTY, AT A R VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADM January 8, 1991 MEETING DATE• Report on Animal Control Ordinance pertaining to AGENDA ITEM• Dogs COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND• isterial At the November 13 board meeti ag a citizen from the Vinton Mag A d to request an exception to the Cnimal District appeared before the Bo an erson had been cit The officer was Animal Control Ordinance. Th thep animal ordinance. hbors. The Control Officer for violating district where her acting on a complaint registtwodd gs in the zoning neig current ordinance only allows home is located and the citizen had four dogs. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION other localities The Board of Supervisors requested the staff t ke P VeListed below is a the number of dogs a citizen may regarding summary of that information: No of Doas Allowed Loci n 4 City of Roanoke 2 Roanoke Country (Residential Districts) Roanoke County (A-1 and R-E Districts) Unlimited (with Private Kennel License) 3 Hopewell Prince William County 4 3 (plus a limit on cats) City of Salem Town of Vinton The County ordinance states: 2 (plus a cat ordinance) 'The harboring or keeping of more than two ~ -3 (2) dogs over six (6) months of age per dwelling unit shall be unlawful unless a private kennel license has been issued pursuant to this article." However, in R-E and A-1 districts with larger acreage, a resident may keep an unlimited number of dogs with a private kennel license. The resident who appeared before tie Board of Supervisors lives in Montgomery Village which has a residential zoning designation. The Planning Department has determined that the lot is approximately one- quarter acre. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The Chief Animal Control Officer and County Administrator concur that the current ordinance should not be changed. The is the first time in five years that a citizen has complained and requested an increase in the number of dogs that may be kept on residential property. ~~ p - rw~" `' Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ---------- VOTE Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) ACTION Motion by: No Yes Abs Eddy Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers ;: ti.~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, JANUARY 8, 1991 RESOLUTION 1891-3 REPEALING RESOLUTION 12390- 8 AND ADOPTING A NEW SECTION OF THE DESIGN AND CONSTRIICTION STANDARDS MANUAL ENTITLED "DRAINAGE STANDARDS" WHEREAS, the Department of Development is in the process of preparing a manual to assist the public, and especially the development community, for clarification of rules, regulations, and policies applicable to land development in Roanoke County; and WHEREAS, a Design and Construction Standards Committee composed of area engineers, surveyors, members of the Roanoke Valley Homebuilders Association, and County staff was assembled to develop the content of the manual and the design standards; and WHEREAS, it was the consensus of the committee to address the areas of water, sewer, street and parking, and drainage in the manual; and WHEREAS, at its meeting on February 14, 1989, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, by resolution, adopted a manual of regulations and policies entitled "Design and Construction Standards Manual" to assist the public in the clarification and interpretation of rules, regulations, and policies applicable to land development in Roanoke County, and in particular, the areas of water, sewer, street and parking; and WHEREAS, the water design standards, street and parking design standards and specifications, and subdivision approval for on-site sewage disposal and well systems standards chapters of the manual have been previously completed and adopted; and WHEREAS, at its meeting on January 23, 1990, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, adopted Resolution 12390- 8, which adopted a new section of the Design and Construction Standards Manual entitled "Stormwater Management Criteria"; and WHEREAS, these standards should be revised and amended. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That Resolution 12390-8 adopted on January 23, 1990, is hereby repealed as of the effective date of this Resolution. 2. That there is hereby adopted the revised fourth component of the Design and Construction Standards Manual entitled "Drainage Standards" which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. 3. That this Resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after , February 1, 1991. On motion of Supervisor Eddy to amend the effective date and to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, Nickens, McGraw NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Development & Inspections Phillip Henry, Director, Engineering Cliff Craig, Director, Utilities Terry Harrington, Director, Planning Don Myers, Assistant County Administrator Paul Mahoney, County Attorney ACTION N0. ITEM NUMBER AT A R RGINIA HELDIAT OHE OANOKER COUNTY ADMINISTRATIONROENTER COUNTY, VI MEETING DATE: January 8, 1991 AGENDA ITEM: Resolution to adopt a revision to the "Design and Construction Standards Manual" entitled Dra naQe Standards COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: BACKGROUND' The Board may recall that in January 1990, we adopted the stormwater management section of the Design and Construction Standards Manual. Several additional chapters have now been completed by the staff and coordinated with the various professional associations involved. Sections 502 through 504 have been added. There are no changes to the section previously adopted by the Board in 1990. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Standards proposed for adoption outline the Design Methodology required for culvert, open-channel, storm sewer and stormwater management facilities. The only requirements that are more stringent than the Virginia Department of Transportation's Drainage Standards, are the material classifications for culverts and storm sewers (concrete vs. corrugated metal). After action by the Board of Supervisors, County staff will meet with the professional associations and construction industry to explain the new standards and their enforcement. FISCAL IMPACT' ALTERNATIVES' STAFF RECOMMENDATION: No public hearing is necessary to adopt the manual, however, staff recommends that Resolution #12390-8 be repealed entitled stormwater Management Criteria and that the attached revision, Drainage Standards, be adopted with an effective date of February 1, 1991. D-`{ e ectfully submitted, ti~~~ Arnold Covey Director, Development & Inspections Approved by, •~ Elmer C. ~.H dge County Administrator ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs Approved ( ) Motion by. Eddy Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers ~- `~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, JANUARY 8, 1991 RESOLUTION REPEALING RESOLUTION 12390-8 AND ADOPTING A NEW SECTION OF THE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS MANUAL ENTITLED "DRAINAGE STANDARDS" WHEREAS, the Department of Development is in the process of preparing a manual to assist the public, and especially the development community, for clarification of rules, regulations, and policies applicable to land development in Roanoke County; and WHEREAS, a Design and Construction Standards Committee composed of area engineers, surveyors, members of the Roanoke Valley Homebuilders Association, and County staff was assembled to develop the content of the manual and the design standards; and WHEREAS, it was the consensus of the committee to address the areas of water, sewer, street and parking, and drainage in the manual; and WHEREAS, at its meeting on February 14, 1989, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, by resolution, adopted a manual of regulations and policies entitled "Design and Construction Standards Manual" to assist the public in the clarification and interpretation of rules, regulations, and policies applicable to land development in Roanoke County, and in particular, the areas of water, sewer, street and parking; and WHEREAS, the water design standards, street and parking design standards and specifications, and subdivision approval for on-site sewage disposal and well systems standards chapters of the manual have been previously completed and adopted; and WHEREAS, at its meeting on January 23, 1990, the Board of ~-~ Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, adopted Resolution 12390- 8, which adopted a new section of the Design and Construction Standards Manual entitled "Stormwater Management Criteria"; and WHEREAS, these standards should be revised and amended. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That Resolution 12390-8 adopted on January 23, 1990, is hereby repealed as of the effective date of this Resolution. 2. That there is hereby adopted the revised fourth component of the Design and Construction Standards Manual entitled "Drainage Standards" which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. 3. That this Resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after January 15, 1991. ~-w TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Title Pace 500.00 Storm Drainage 500.01 Purpose 1 501.00 Definitions 2 502.00 General 502.01 Drainage Systems 6 503.00 HydroloQ_y 503.01 Peak Discharge (Methodology) 9 10 503.02 Hydrographs (Methodology) 10 503.03 Design Storms 504.00 Hydraulics 504.01 Culverts 13 15 504.02 Open Channels 19 504.03 Storm Sewers 21 504.04 Inlet and Outlet Protection 505.00 Stormwater Management 505.01 General Requirements 23 505.02 Design Methodology 25 506.00 Reserved 507.00 Reserved 508.00 Reserved 509.00 Disclaimer of Liability 30 510.00 Maintenance of Storm Drainaae and Management Systems 510.01 Single family, Townhouses, and 31 Condominium Developments 510.02 Office, Shopping Centers, Rental Multi-family, Mobile Home Parks, Commercial, Industrial and 32 Institutional Developments Appendix 500.00 500.01 DRAINAGE STANDARDS Purpose 1. Inhibit deterioration of existing waters and waterways by requiring stormwater Management Plans that will restrict postdevelopment runoff characteristics, as nearly as practicable, to be equal to or better than predevelopment run- off characteristics. 2. Establish procedures to administer all drainage and stormwater planning. 3. Establish long-term responsibility for the maintenance of stormwater management installa- tions. 4. Develop Design Standards to control drainage and stormwater management installations in Roanoke County. 1 501.00 DEFINITIONS Special terms used in this Stormwater Management Criteria are defined as follows: ACRE-FOOT - Volume of water that would cover one (1) acre to a depth of one (1) foot. One acre-foot is equal to 43,560 cubic feet. ADEQUATE CHANNEL - Manmade channel or pipe which is capable of conveying the runoff from a 10-year storm, without over- topping its banks or eroding the channel lining. Natural channel capable of conveying the runoff from a 2-year storm without overtopping its banks or eroding the channel lining. BACKWATER - (a) A flow retarding influence due to a dam, bridge, culvert, or another stream. (b) The increase in water surface elevation, due to a constriction, above the normal unconstricted elevation. BACKWATER CURVE - A particular form of the surface curve of a stream of water which is concave upward. It is caused by an obstruction in the channel such as an overflow dam. BRIDGE - A structure erected over a watercourse, depression, or obstacle. As distinguished from a culvert it is a large structure spanning a watercourse, the bed of which is left comparatively undisturbed. CHANNEL - An elongated depression having a definite bed and bank which serves to confine the flow of water. COEFFICIENT OF ROUGHNESS - A roughness factor in the Kutter, Manning (n), Hazen and other formulas expressing the charac- teristics of a channel to handle flowing water. CONDUIT - A general term for any facility intended for the conveyance of water, whether open or closed. CONTROL SECTION - A section or a reach of a conduit or channel where conditions exist that make the water level a stable index of discharge. A control may be partial or complete. A complete control is independent of downstream conditions and is effective at all stages . An overflow dam or rock ledge crossing a channel are examples. Controls may be either natural or artificial. CULVERT - A closed conduit carrying water through a highway, railroad, or other embankment. A culvert is distinguished from a bridge by generally having the same material all around its perimeter, and having a regular, symmetrical shape. 2 CUTOFF - A wall, collar, or other structure intended to reduce percolation of water along otherwise smooth surfaces, or through porous strata. DEBRIS - Any material, including floating trash or suspended sediment moved by a flowing stream. DIRECTOR - Director of Development and Inspections for Roanoke County. DISCHARGE - (a) The quantity of water, silt, or other mobile substances passing along a conduit per unit of time: rate of flow expressed as cubic feet per second, liters per second, million of gallons per day, etc. (b) The act involved in water or other liquid passing through an opening or along a conduit or channel. (c) The water or other liquid which emerges from an opening or passes along a conduit or channel. DITCH - An artificial channel. DRAINAGE AREA - The drainage area of a stream at a specified location, measured in a horizontal plane, which is enclosed by a topographic divide such that direct surface runoff from precipitation normally would drain by gravity into the drain- ageway at that point. DRAINAGE BASIN - A geographical area or region that is so sloped and contoured that surface runoff from streams and other natural watercourses is carried away by a single drainage system by gravity to a common outlet or outlets. Also referred to as a watershed or drainage area. FLOOD PEAK - The maximum discharge of a particular flood at a given point along a stream. FLOOD PLAIN - (a) Any plain which borders a stream and is covered by its water in time of flood. (b) Stream bed areas subject to recurrent overflow or inundation. FLOOD ROUTING - Determining the changes in the rise and fall of floodwater as it proceeds downstream along a drainageway, including the effects of structures. FLOODWAY j 100-year frecruencvl - The channel of a river, stream or other watercourse and the adjacent land area that must be reserved to discharge a 100-year flood. FRE UENCY OF STORM - The anticipated period in years that will elapse, based on average probability of storms in the design region, before a storm of a given intensity and/or total volume will recur. A 10-year storm can be expected to occur on the average of once every 10 years. 3 FRICTION LOSS - The head or energy loss caused by the contact between a moving stream of water and its containing conduit. HEADWATER - (a) The water upstream from a structure. (b) The source of a stream. HYDRAULIC GRADE LINE - In a closed conduit, a line joining the elevation at which water could stand in risers. In an open conduit, the hydraulic grade line is the water surface plus the piezometric head. HYDROGRAPH - A graph showing for a given point on a stream or for a given point in any drainage system the discharge, stage (depth), velocity, or other property of water with respect to time. HYDROLOGY - The science dealing with the waters of the earth in their various forms; precipitation, evaporation, runoff, and ground water. IMPERVIOUS - Condition of a material that prevents significant percolation. INVERT - The floor, bottom, or lowest part in the cross section of conduit. PEAK DISCHARGE - The maximum instantaneous flow from a given storm condition at a specific location. PERCOLATION - The movement of water through soil. POSTDEVELOPMENT - Runoff conditions that may reasonably be expected or anticipated to exist after completion of the land development activity on a specific site or tract of land. PREDEVELOPMENT - Runoff conditions that exist at the time that plans for the development of a tract of land are approved by the plan approval authority. For staged development, the first item approved or permitted shall establish the time at which predevelopment conditions are fixed. In the case of land development by governmental agencies, the initiation of land acquisition shall establish the time at which predevelop- ment condition are fixed. RECEIVING NATURAL WATERCOURSE - Natural watercourse with definite banks and bottoms, with flow either intermittently or at all times. RUNOFF COEFFICIENT - The ratio of runoff to precipitation. RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER - (CN) An index developed by the United States Soil Conservation Service and used to represent the 4 combined hydrologic condition and antecedent soil moisture. STORM SEWER - A sewer that carries only storntwater, drainage and other surface water, but not domestic sewage or industrial wastes. A storm sewer system consists of underground con- duits, inlets, manholes, open channels, swales and special appurtenances. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT FACILITIES - A facility constructed for the purpose of reducing the post-developed stormwater rate and/or volume. TAIL WATER - The water just downstream from a structure. TIME OF CONCENTRATION - The time it takes for runoff to travel from the hydraulically most distant part of the watershed to the point of reference. 5 502.00 GENERAL 502.01 Drainage Systems A. Drainage systems are to be divided into two (2) distinct parts; the major and minor systems. 1. The minor svstem consists of drainage systems designed to convey the more frequent storms, Typically, the minor system includes storm sewers, culverts, roadside ditches, outlet ditches and stormwater management facilities. 2. The major svstem consists of drainage systems designed to convey less frequent storms. The major system consists of emergency spillways, overland swales, natural watercourses and temporary ponding areas. Major systems are used to protect buildings and other important features from flooding and to prevent catastrophic failures. B. In addition to these standards, the designer shall refer to: 1. VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DRAIN- AGE MANUAL, latest edition, (Drainage Manual). 2. VIRGINIA EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL HAND- BOOK,latest edition, (E & S Handbook). 3. PLANNING BULLETIN 319 BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES FOR HYDRAULIC MODIFICATION, Virginia State Water Control Board, latest edition, (BMP). 4. TECHNICAL RELEASE 55 URBAN HYDROLOGY FOR SMALL WATERSHEDS, United States Soil (TR- Conservation Service, latest edition, 55). 5. NATIONAL ENGINEERING HANDBOOK SECTION 4• "HYDROLOGY", United States Soil Conserva- tion Service, latest edition, (NEH-4}. 6. NATIONAL ENGINEERING HANDBOOK SECTION 5• "HYDRAULICS", United States Soil Conserva- tion Service, latest edition, (NEH-5). 7. HEC-2 WATER SURFACE PROFILES, United States 6 Army Corps of Engineers, latest edition, (HEC-2). $. WSPRO WATER SURFACE PROFILES, United States Geological Survey, latest edition, (WSPRO). 9. TECHNICAL RELEASE 20 PROJECT FORMULATION - HYDROLOGY, United States Soil Conservation Service, latest edition, (TR-20). 10. ROAD AND BRIDGE STANDARDS, Virginia Depart- ment of Transportation, latest edition, (VDOT Stds). 11. ROAD AND BRIDGE SPECIFICATIONS, Virginia Department of Transportation, latest edition, (VDOT Specs). 12. URBAN BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES, Virginia State Water Control Board, latest edition, (Urban BMP). C. General Provisions The construction materials and methods used for this Section shall conform to the current Virginia Department of Transportation Road and Bridge Specifications unless otherwise modified within these standards. D. Conflicting Provisions Policv Whenever any provisions of these Storm Drainage Standards impose a greater requirement, or a higher standard, than is required in any State or Federal regulation or other provision of the Construction Standards Manual, or other County Ordinance, or regulation, the provisions of the Storm Drainage Standards shall govern. Whenever any provision of any State or Federal statute or other provision of the Construction Standards Manual or other County Ordinance or regulation impose a greater require- ment, or a higher standard, than is required by the Storm Drainage Standards, the provisions of the State or Federal statue or other provisions of the Construction Standards Manual or other County Ordinance, or regulation, shall govern. E. Due to the complexity of storm drainage, designers are encouraged to pursue innovative solutions. 7 However, such design shall be accompanied by documentation as to the appropriateness of design and maintenance requirements. 503.00 HYDROLOGY 503.01 Peak Discharge ~ Methodoloay) A. Rational Method (P=Cf CIA) 1. Drainage areas up to 200 acres. 2. Refer to Drainage Manual for details. a. Time of Concentration 1. Overland Flow Time (up to 200 feet) (Fig. 1) 2. Channel Flow Time (Fig. 2) b. Rainfall Intensity (I) 1. Rainfall Intensity Curve {Fig. 3) c. Runoff Coefficients (C) (Fig. 4) d. Correction Factor for Ground Saturation (Cf) 1. 10 year storm or less: 1.0 2. 25 year storm: 1.1 3. 50 year storm: 1.2 4. 100 year storm: 1.25 B . Anderson Method ( Q = 2 3 0 KRA"T-0'48 ) 1. Drainage areas over 200 acres. 2. Refer to Drainage Manual for details. a. The exponent x in the equation shall be: 1. 1.0 from 200 acres to 1 square mile 2. 0.82 for over 1 square mile C. TR-55 (Peak Discharge Method) 1. Drainage areas with a time of concentration of 2 hours or more. 2. Refer to TR-55 for details. 9 D. TR-20 1. Drainage areas larger than 1 square mile. 2. Refer to TR-20 and NEH-4 for details. a. Sub-areas should not exceed 200 acres. 503.02 Hydroaraphs (Methodolo A. Modified Rational 1. Drainage Areas up to 100 acres. 2. Refer to E & S Handbook. B. Unit Hydrograph (2 hour duration storm) 1. Drainage area limitations are the same as those outlined in Section 503.01. The overall drainage area can be broken into 200 acre sub-areas such that the peak runoff rate for each sub-area is computed by the Rational Method. 2. Refer to NEH-4 and Fig. 5 for details. C. TR-5 5 (Tabular Method) 1. Drainage areas with up to a two (2) hour time of concentration. 2. Refer to TR-55 for details. D. TR-20 1. All drainage areas. 2. Sub-areas should not exceed 200 acres. 3. Refer to NEH-4 for details. 503.03 Design Storms A. Culvert and Bridges: 1. Primary/Arterial Highways. a. 25 year storm, minimum 10 2. Secondary/Non-Arterial Highways. a. 10 year storm, minimum B. Stormwater Management Facilities: 1. Principal Spillway. a. Designed to release a post-developed 25 year storm at a maximum of the pre- developed 10 year peak rate and a post- developed 10 year storm at a maximum of the pre-developed 2 year peak rate. The discharge criteria for both designs shall be met. 2. Emergency Spillway. a. Design storm based on dam height and impoundment size, refer to Fig. 6. * Height of dam will be measured from the downstream toe of the dam to the top of the embankment. b. One foot of freeboard will be provided above the one hundred year storm peak discharge. Principal spillways less than 24", shall be considered as inoperative. 3. The point of discharge shall be to a channel, storm sewer or natural watercourse. C. Open Channels 1. Refer to Section 504.02 of these standards. D. Storm Sewers 1. Pipe: a. 10 year storm, minimum 2. Inlets: a. General 1. The designer should always be aware of the potential for flooding on adjacent property resulting from overtaxed inlets and should increase his design storm accordingly. 11 b. Curb 1. 3.5 inches per hour rainfall intensity. c. Yard and Median 1. 10 year storm, minimum E. Major System: 1. All major systems shall be designed for a 100 year storm. 2. Provide a one (1) foot freeboard between the 100 year flood level and buildings and other occupied structures. 12 504.00 HYDRAULICS 504.01 Culverts A. Refer to Drainage Manual and NEH-4 for detailed discussions on designing culverts. The attached culvert design worksheet shall be completed showing both head and tail water conditions. B. Size and Length Restrictions: 1. 15 inches, minimum equivalent diameter 2. 15 inches to 42 inches equivalent diameter a. 300 foot maximum length when the average velocity is between 3.5 and 5 feet per second (V=Q/A). b. 400 foot maximum length when the average velocity exceeds 5 feet per second. C. Headwater Depth Restrictions: 1. The most restrictive of the following con- ditions for headwater depth shall govern the size of the culvert. a. HW/D = 1.0 to 1.5 b. 18 inches under the shoulder of a public road for culvert under a public road and equal to the shoulder for culvert paral- lel to a public road. c. Cannot raise the existing 100 year flood- plain elevation (Federal Insurance Agency Agency or those required by these standards) by more than one (1) foot. d. Obtain drainage easements to encompass the headwater pool for a 100 year storm. If the 100 year flood level on adjacent properties (not owned by the developer) remains unchanged after installing the culvert, this drainage easement require- ment will be waived. D. Material 1. All culverts shall be concrete with clas- 13 sification based on the design load. 2. All appurtenances such as end sections and endwalls shall conform to VDOT Stds and VDOT Specs• E. Plan and Profile Requirements: 1. Scale: Horizontal: 1"=50', minimum Vertical: 1"=10', minimum 2. Delineate culverts and appurtenances a. Flow direction arrows b. VDOT Stds designation c. Pipe size, material, classification, gage, slope, length. d. Invert elevations, maximum design head and tail water depth (minor and major storm), design flow, and design cover. 1. Minimum cover shall be one (1) foot or 1/2 the pipe diameter/depth, which ever is greater. 3. Planimetric and topographic information a. Existing and finished grades 4. Utility crossings a. Refer to State Health Department Regulations for sewer and water conflicts. b. Otherwise, 18 inch minimum vertical separation. 5. Easements (must agree with plat) a. Must be recorded on either the sub- division plat for the development or on a recorded individual parcel plat. b. Refer to Fig. 8 for required easement width. 6. Inlet and outlet protection 14 a. Refer to Section 504.04 of these standards. 7. Bench mark with elevation and description 8. Details: a. Special designs other than VDOT Stds shall be certified by a Professional Engineer licensed in the Commonwealth of Virginia. 504.02 Open Channels: A. Refer to Drainage Manual, NEH-5, BMP, and E & S Handbook for detail discussion on designing open channels. B. General 1. Design Criteria: a. Minor System: 1. Drainage area up to one ( 1) square mile A. Full bank capacity: 10 year storm B. Lining to withstand the two (2) year storm velocity i. Acceptable velocity limits for various types of lining are shown in Fig. 7 2 . Drainage area in excess of one ( 1) square mile A. Full bank capacity: 10 year storm with a one (1) foot freeboard (freeboard must be confined within the easement or right of way). B. Lining to withstand the ten (10) year storm velocity. i. Acceptable velocity limits for various types 15 of lining are shown in Fig. 7. b. Major System: 1. Capacity: 100 year storm 2. Lining: A. If there is a potential for catastrophic failure (i.e. dams, etc.), the lining shall withstand the 100 year storm velocity, otherwise use the 10 year storm velocity. Acceptable velocity limits for v a r i o u s types of lining are shown in Fig. 7. 2. Design Methodology: a. Manning's Equation: 1. Usage: A. Uniform channel cross-section B. Uniform channel slope C. Natural cross-sections at specific locations i. No downstream obstructions ii. Relatively uniform cross- section and slope. 2. N values for grass-lined channels, see Fig. 9 and 9A. b. Backwater Analysis (Step Method): 1. Usag e: A. Non-uniform channel slope B. Non-uniform cross-section evaluations. C. Multiple cross-section evaluations 16 i. Downstream obstruction ii. Hydraulic jumps iii. Transitional structure iv. Floodplain evaluations Drainage Area > 100 acres 2. Computer Models A. HEC-2 B. WSPRO c. Critical Depth: Since supercritical flows include wave action, air bulking, and splash; 1. All channel computations shall include critical depth calcula- tions. 2. For supercritical flow (flow depth less than the computed critical depth, provide freeboard H~~ in feet. A. H~~ = 0.25 v(d)'iz V = velocity (fps) d = maximum depth (ft) d. Superelevation through bend/curves 1. For open channels in a bend/curve, the design depth shall be increased by H, with A. H H V g Ro R; 2.3 VZ/g Log (Ro/R;) Superelevation (ft) Average velocity (fps) 32.2 ft/sect Outside radius (ft) Inside radius (ft) C. Plan and Profile Requirements: 1. Scale: Horizontal: 1"=50', minimum Vertical: 1"=10', minimum 2. Delineate open channel and appurtenances 17 a. Flow direction arrows b. VDOT Stds designation c. Stations d. Invert elevations, design depth, design flow, velocity, grades (ft/ft} e. Lining by station f. Minimum Grades (Man made channels) 1. Grass and Rip-rap: A. 1 percent (0.01 ft/ft) or greater. 2. Paved (Concrete or Bituminous) A. 0.5 percent (0.005 ft/ft) or greater. 3. Planimetric and topographic information a. Existing and finished grades 4. Utility crossings a. Refer to State Health Department Regulations for sewer and water conflicts. b. Otherwise, provide a minimum cover for utilities of 36 inches, or encase in concrete. 5. Easements (must agree with plat) a. Must be recorded on either the subdivision plat for the development or on a recorded individual parcel plat. b. Refer to Fig. 8 for required easement width. 6. Outlet protection a. Refer to Section 504.04 of these standards. 18 7. Bench mark elevation and description. 8. Details: a. Special designs other than VDOT Stds shall be certified by a Professional Engineer licensed in the Commonwealth of Virginia. 504.03 Storm Sewers: A. Refer to Drainage Manual and NEH-5 for detail discussions on design procedures. B. Size and length restrictions: 1. 15 inches, minimum size 2. 15 inches to 42 inches a. 300 feet maximum length when the average velocity is between 3.5 and 5 feet per second (V = Q/A). b. 400 feet maximum length when the average velocity exceeds 5 feet per second. C. Materials: 1. All storm sewers shall be concrete with the classification based on design load. a. Other pipe materials must be approved in writing prior to approval of plans. If plans were previously approved showing concrete pipes, revised plans and calculations must be submitted for approval prior to installation. 2. All appurtenances such as manholes, inlets, etc. shall conform to VDOT Stds and VDOT S ecs. D. Plan and Profile: 1. Scale: Horizontal: 1"=50', minimum Vertical: 1"=10', minimum 2. Delineate storm sewers and appurtenances a. Flow direction arrows 19 b. VDOT Stds designation c. Pipe size, material, classification, gauge, slope, length. d. Invert elevations, top elevations, design depth, hydraulic gradeline, design flow, design cover, IS shaping in inlets and manholes. 1. Minimum cover shall be one (1) foot or 1/2 the pipe diameter/depth, whichever is greater. e. Manholes and inlets numbered. 3. Planimetric and topographic information a. Existing and finished grades 4. Utility crossings a. Refer to State Health Department Regulations for sewer and water conflicts. b. Otherwise, 18 inch minimum vertical separation. 5. Easements (must agree with plat) a. Must be recorded on either the subdivision plat for the development or on a recorded individual parcel plat. b. Refer to Fig. 8 for required easement width. 6. Outlet protection a. Refer to Section 504.04 of these standards. 7. Bench mark with elevation and description. 8. Details a. Provide detail for all structures not in VDOT Stds. b. Designs must be certified by a Professional Engineer licensed in the 20 Commonwealth of Virginia. 504.04 Inlet and Outlet Protection A. Applicability 1. Inlet and outlet protection shall be provided for all culverts storm sewers, open channels, spillways, etc. B. End Sections and Endwalls 1. Provide flared end sections for 15" to 36" equivalent diameter pipes (storm sewer and culverts), except: a. 15" to 18" roadside driveway culverts, b. Slope exceeds 20 feet in height, and/or slope exceeds a 2:1 slope, then provide a standard headwall. 2. Provide headwall for all outlet pipes greater than 36" equivalent diameter. C. Erosion Protection 1. Length a. Refer to Fig. 12 & 13 2. Material a. Velocity 0-4 fps 4-10 fps 7-18 fps 18+ fps b. Refer to Material ..... Sod Protection ..... EC-1, Type A; EC-3A (4- 7 fps) ; & EC-3B ( 7-10 fps ) ..... EC-l, Type B ..... Special Design Dissipator Fig. 12 & 13 for rip-rap sizes. 3. Plans 1. Shall be shown on appropriate plan and profiles. (e.g.; Outlet protection for culverts should be shown with the culvert plans.) 2. Provide details: 21 a. Stone size and/or type b. Depth, length, cross-section. 22 505.00 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT 505.01 General Requirements A. Every land developer/owner shall provide a storm- water management plan with all site plan and subdivision submissions. An acceptable stormwater management plan can be obtained by: 1. Providing necessary on-site stormwater management facilities. 2. Providing joint facilities with another development. 3. Entering into an agreement with the County for off-site stormwater management facilities, if the following conditions are met: a. Development site is located in the lower or upper third of a named watershed, and/or b. The land developer/owner contributes to other watershed drainage improvements the equivalent cost of providing on-site stormwater management (appraised land value + facility cost). 4. With prior approval, granting easement or dedicating land for a regional stormwater management facility in lieu of a required onsite stormwater management facility. 5. Meeting the following exemptions: a. Minor land disturbing activities, less than 1,000 cubic yard volume, less than 10,000 square feet disturbed surface area, and promptly stabilized with vegetation. b. Accepted agricultural management practices permitted by E&S Handbook. c. Individual private septic and utility (sewer, water, storm, etc.) systems which do not alter the natural terrain. d. Minor development activities where the increase in impervious area is less than 500 sq. feet. 23 e. Single family houses on Platted lots of record unless stormwater management re- quirements are noted on the Subdivision Plat. B. The following, when submitted in writing, can be considered for a waiver by the Director of Develop- ment and Inspections. The Director may require that the owner, or .Developer, provide information neces- sary to making such a determination. 1. Subdivision of detached single family resid- ential that meets the following: a . One (1) acre minimum lot size and ten ( 10 ) acre maximum subdivision size. b. 1/2 acre minimum lot size and four (4) acre maximum subdivision size. c . 1/3 acre minimum lot size and two ( 2 ) acre maximum subdivision size. d. Two (2) acre minimum lot size. 2. Subdivision of multi-family residential developments which total a maximum of two (2) acres and have a density of less than four (4) units/acre. 3. Minor site developments with less than 0.5 cubic feet per second increase in peak dis- charge based on a 10-year frequency peak discharge rate. 4. A waiver request of stormwater management will be evaluated based on the following conditions: a. The hydraulic characteristics of the re- ceiving stream or the environment char- acteristics of the stream or the site are such that on-site management or detention of flows are contrary to sound engineering practices or detrimental to the environ- ment; b. The increased quantity or velocity of stormwater generated by the development will have a minor effect on the receiving stream. 24 5. Each request for waiver will be considered in- dividually by the Director. All applications for a waiver will receive a written response outlining the reasons for approval, or denial, within 30 days of receipt of all information requested by the Director In reviewing the waiver application, the Director shall closely examine all storm drainage outfalls, receiving channels and channel capacities, velocities and other related storm drainage discharge considerations to determine the need for additional outfall treatment and/or channel protection needs. C. Any additions, extensions and/or modifications to development which were previously exempted under these standards shall provide stormwater management for the entire combined development when the acreage limitations are exceeded. D. For purposes of clarity and administrative efficien- cy, the following conditions shall apply to these guidelines and the resultant plans developed under them: 1. Building on, or resurfacing, an existing impervious area shall not require stormwater management nor shall it be included as an additional impervious area. 2. Impervious area calculations for buildings shall include all overhanging projections such as eaves, canopies and porticoes. 505.02 Design Methodology A. Detention Basins: 1. Refer to Section 503.02 for design hydrographs and Section 503.03 for applicable design storms. 2. Refer to NEH-4 for routing procedures. 3. Emergency Spillway Design a. Preference should be given to Broad Crested Weirs. 1. Refer to Fig. 10 and l0A for design details. 25 4. Principal Spillways a. Preference should be given to sharp-edged orifices. 1. Refer to Fig. 11 for design details . 5. Embankment/Dam Design a. Actual design, construction, and as-built plans shall be certified by a Professional Engineer licensed in the Commonwealth of Virginia. 6. Miscellaneous a. Stormwater management easements shall extend 15 feet outside the maximum pool stage and toe of embankment/dam or to a public road right of way. 1. When a facility is next to a public road right of way, the owner/devel- oper must define a method of main- tenance acceptable to the County of Roanoke. 2. Access easements shall be a minimum of 15 feet in width. b. If the facility is over four (4) feet deep, takes over two (2) hours to drain, the interior slope exceeds 3(H):1(V), or is in a congested area; permanent fencing may be required. 1. Fences shall be a minimum of six (6) feet high, a minimum of standard nine (9) gauge chain link fence with one (1) or more double gates (minimum 10 feet wide) for access. c. Minimum slope of basin "floor": one (1) percent to principal spillway. (Does not apply to "wet" ponds.} B. Infiltration Trenches 1. The use of infiltration trenches shall be limited to areas where runoff will be relative- ly free of chemicals and silt. The use of "grass filter" strips between small parking 26 areas and infiltration trenches should reduce chemicals and silt sufficiently to protect the groundwater from chemicals and the trenches from clogging with silt. 2. Refer to Section 503.02 for the design hydro- graphs and Section 503.03 for applicable design storms. 3. Refer to NEH-4 for routing procedures. 4. Determination of Infiltration Rates: a. An observation hole shall be excavated four (4) feet below the planned depth of the infiltration trench. b. Two (2) metal cylinders shall be driven into the soil such that the soil is relatively undisturbed. The bottom of the center cylinder (6-14" diameter) shall be driven six (6) inches below grade. The bottom edge of the outer cylinder (16- 30 " diameter ) shall be two ( 2 ) to four ( 4 ) inches below grade. The center cylinder shall include a mark one (1) inch from the leveled top edge. c. Water shall be poured into the center cylinder until the water overflows into the outer cylinder to an equal height. d. The water level in the center cylinder shall be allowed to drop one (1) inch to the mark noted above . The time required to drop one (1) inch shall be recorded. The center and outer cylinder shall be filled again and the test repeated. The test shall be repeated until the time required to drop one (1) inch is constant . The constant time for the water to drop one (1) inch is the infiltration rate, I (min/inch). 5. Infiltration trenches shall be constructed in accordance with Fig. 17. 6. Initial trench size (A) in square feet shall be based on ten (10) percent of the total impervious area of the site. 27 7. The volume of the trench shall be equal to: VOL = K(D)A/2 where: K = fraction of voids (0.41 for No. 2 stone) D = depth (ft) A =surface area of trench (sq. ft.) 8. To convert the soil infiltration rate (I,min/inch} to the trench infiltration rate (IR, cfs), use the following equation: IR = A/(720)(I) where: A = trench surface area (sq. ft.) 9. The site grading plan shall show a means of draining an infiltration trench if the trench is surcharged. 10. Under no circumstances shall an infiltration trench take more than five (5) days to completely drain. C. Other Stormwater Management Facilities: 1. The developer/owner's engineer shall provide documentation as to the applicability and design of alternative stormwater management facilities such as percolation trenches, rooftop storage, etc. 2. Alternative methods will be reviewed and approved on individual project merits. D. Plans 1. Scale: 1"=30' up to five (5) acres, otherwise 1"=50'. 2. Existing and proposed contours with sufficient spot elevations to adequately describe the project. a. Maximum two (2) foot contour interval. 3. For detention/retention basins: a. Principal spillway; plan view and details b. Emergency spillway; plan view and cross- sections 28 c. Access road 1. Maximum grade o f 18 ~ i f paved and 10 ~ if unpaved. d. Fencing e. Low flow channel f. Other features such as headwalls, trash racks, etc. 4. Easement limits with metes and bounds description. 5. Adjoining buildings, roads, drainage facili- ties, etc. impacted by the stormwater manage- ment facility. 6. Bench mark elevation with description. 7. Certification by a Professional Engineer as to "As-built" condition. 8. Details a. Provide details for all items not in the VDOT Stds. b. Details must be certified by a Profes- sional Engineer licensed in the Common- wealth of Virginia. E. Easement: 1. All easements must be recorded on either the subdivision plat for the development or on a recorded individual parcel plat. 2. Easement Limit a. Refer to Fig. 8 and Section 505.02, Subsection A. 6.. 29 506.00 RESERVED 507.00 RESERVED 508.00 RESERVED 509.00 DISCLAIMER OF LIABILITY The degree of flood and drainage protection required by these standards is considered reasonable for regulatory purposes. Larger floods or unusual circumstances may occur on rare occasions, or flood heights may be increased by manmade or natural causes, such as bridge openings restricted by debris. This article does not imply that areas outside the 100 year flood plain or land uses permitted within such districts will be free from flooding or flood damages. Additionally, the grant of a permit, or approval of a site, subdivision or land development plan in an identified flood hazard area shall not constitute a representation, guarantee or warranty of any kind by any official or employee of the County of the practicability or safety of the proposed use and shall create no liability upon the County, its officials or employees. 30 510.00 MAINTENANCE OF STORM SEWER SYSTEMS AND STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS Easements shall be dedicated during the land development process when the topography and the natural drainageways are altered. Drainage easements are required for the maintenance of storm sewer systems, open channels as defined by the Virginia Erosion and Sediment Control Handbook, improved drainageways, and for stormwater management facilities. Access easements are necessary to maintain a drainageway, stormwater management facilities, or storm sewer system located on private property. Furthermore, drainage easements are intended to restrict private property owners from disturbing land contained in the easement in such a manner as to alter the drainageway to the detriment of neighbors upstream or downstream. Similarly, easements for underground pipes assure that no other permanent structures will be allowed. The purpose of this section is to define the respon- sibility for the maintenance of storm drainage and storm- water management facilities located in the dedicated easements. Public maintenance responsibility will not be accepted for detention/retention facilities with a permanent pool, or for underground storage tanks. 510.01 Single family, townhouse and condominium develop- ments The maintenance of the storm sewer systems and stormwater management facilities located in properly dedicated easements will be the responsibility of the related Homeowners' Association or property owner. Roanoke County may accept maintenance responsibility for storm drainage facilities which are in open common areas with adequate access, all subject to written application and consideration on an individual basis. The following note shall be added to the easement plat: "The Homeowners' Association or property owner of this development shall assume the maintenance respons- ibility of the storm drainage system and of the storm-water management facility located therein, and con- tained within an easement properly 31 dedicated." The note shall be modified accordingly where main- tenance of the storm sewer system is accepted by the County. 510.02 Offices, shopping centers, rental multi-family dwelling, mobile home parks, commercial, industrial and institutional development For maintenance of storm drainage systems and stormwater management facilities located in commer- cial, office, industrial, rental multi-family dwellings, mobile home parks or similar uses, the following note shall be added to the plat: "The owner of fee title to the property on which an easement is shown is responsible for maintenance of the storm drainage and stormwater management facilities located there- in." 32 PLAN REVIEW CHECIC LIST APPENDIX Yes No I. PLANS _ _ 1. North arrow and scale shown on each sheet. (Minimum scale: 1"=50' unless otherwise noted) 2. Centerline, _ _ curve data, _ _ stations, lot lines & numbers shown. _ _ 3. R/W lines including dimensions (radius or radial lines} shown. _ _ 4. Slope easements for slopes where slopes exceed proposed right-of-way limits shown. 5. Names of adjacent subdivisions and/or proper- ty owners denoted. _ _ 6. Development limits shown. 7. Existing state route numbers and street names shown. 8. Approved or proposed street names shown. 9. Destination of routes and streets shown. _ _ 10. Radii for easements, turn-arounds, cul-de- sac, flares, etc., shown. 11. Guardrail where needed shown. _ _ 12. Vicinity map shown with location referenced 0.01 mile to nearest intersection. _ _ 13. General notes. _ 14. Location of paved ditches by station shown. _ 15. Entrance pipe sizes shown for each lot. 16. Proposed drainage layout and description shown. 33 Yes No 17. Erosion control stone and type shown. _ 18. Channel change and outlet ditches and ease- ments shown. _ _ 19. Zoning shown. _ _ 20. Projected traffic count for each street between intersections shown. _ 21. Spot elevations in difficult stages, i.e. intersections, turn arounds, etc. _ _ 22. Lighting fixture; mounting height, lamp lumens (mean rating) II. PROFILE AND GRADE 1. Existing ground line shown. 2. Grade line (mainline and connections) shown. a. ~ of grade, CG, VC, and VSD shown. b. finished grade elevations (50' on tangent, 25' on vertical curve}. c. station on profile agrees with plan stations. d. name of streets shown. e. grade line extended 250' beyond develop- ment boundary where appropriate. f. minimum grade: 0.5~ curb & gutter and 1.0~ for shoulder and ditch section. g. maximum of 7~ for turnarounds. 3. Invert elevations on proposed drainage structures shown. 4. Profile and grades for outfall ditches shown. 5. Grades for special channels and ditches shown. _ 6. Profile for proposed storm sewers shown (hydraulic grade line to be included where applicable). _ _ 7. Site distance at intersection and entrance satisfactory. 34 III. GRADING PLAN (Minimum scale: 1"=30' up to 5 acres and 1"=50' over 5 acres) Yes No _ 1. _ _ 2. _ _ 3. a. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Existing contours shown. Proposed grading contours shown. Contour of computed headwater shown. 100-year flood elevation for drainage greater than 100 acres. Foundation elevations of buildings shown if questionable. Design layout for drainage system shown. Parking, loading berths, and dumpster enclosures Landscaping. Screening and buffer. IV. TYPICAL SECTIONS - Geometrics shall be governed by traffic counts 1. Projected traffic count shown for each street between intersecti ons shown. 2. Centerline shown. 3. Point of finished grade noted. 4. Surface* B ase* Subbase* a. width a. width _ _ a. width _ b. cross b. cross b. cross slope- _ slope _ _ slope c. type _ _ c. type _ _ c. type d. depth- _ d. depth _ _ c. depth _ _ (*According to s econdary roa ds current criteria) 35 Yes No 5. Shoulders Ditches Slopes a. cut _ _ a. width _ _ a. ratio noted b. fill _ _ b. depth _ _ b. rounding- _ c. slope c. slope c. seeding- _ ratio ratio 6. Same as above for each different road typical section required. _ 7. Channel changes, outlet and inlet ditches shown. _ _ a. bottom width b. side slopes _ c. depth _ d. length _ _ e. if lined, show depth & type of lining f. computation _ _ 8. Special design typical sections included. _ 9. Stations to which typical sections apply shown under typical section. _ 10. Driveway entrances. V. DRAINAGE GENERAL _ _ 1. Existing or proposed drainage easements shown water course. 2. Direction of flow by arrows for pipe and ditches shown. 3. Drainage areas in acres (Supported by out- lined contour map). 4. Pipe sizes to be in accordance with standard sizes. 5. Items not Virginia Department of Transporta- tion standards are to be detailed. _ _ 6. Type of pipe to be installed (on and off right-of-way noted). a. Design cover shown. 36 _ _ 7. Design computation computed according to current Virginia Department of Transporta- tion criteria included. 37 X000 900 35 800 700 600 30 S00 0.9 400 25 o.a 300 0.7 200 0.6 20 ~ ... c O.S E a~ ~ 0.4 c 0.S ~ ~ J A 0 9a 0.3 0 ~ 0 2 ~ 80 . 0 ap 02 U c 70 5.0 ~ 60 ,~ o ~ ~ ~ SO v 20 E 40 ?~ 10 30 g 8 20 PsvM Surface: C=0.! 7 Bata SOS: C=O.SB -oor Grass: C=0.46 AttKala Grass: 0=0.33 14 Daesa Gra:s: C:0.2 6 Sourcr. Data Book for CIvN Engr~ars, Yolume I, Se elye FIG. 1 OVERLAND FLOW TIME ~. .-K- -,. H(ft) soo 400 300 200 4S0 -- ° ' ,~ L(ft) Tc(~inl - ~o,ooo ~° o ~ ~ ~ ~ 5,000 40 ~ ~ ar 40 ;~ c o .,,., c 3Q f- 3 000 " ~ i° , w.. 20 a 20 000 2 = . 1.s00 °D v 15 c o ~ J U ~ ~ ~ E ~'~ ~ N '~ E 8 o X ~ S s ~ soo s 0 4 4 = 3 300 ~ 3 = 2 200 DSO 2 100 t 1 Note: Mwtriy To -~r 9.t kr ~wb t3~Ns Sowct CivN En pM1~. Voiwas 10, No.6, JuM tl40, Kxp~ch F1G. 2 CHANNEL FLOW TIME Ground Coyer C Streets: ~. ~ 0.9 Roofs 0.9 Lawns (Sandy Soil1 Flat, 2'/. 0.05 - 0.10 Average, 2 to 7'/. 0.10 - 0.15 Steep, •7X 0.15 - 0.20 Lawns (Heavy Soi11 Flat, 2'~ O.tS - 0.20 Average, 2 to 7'/. 0.20 - 0.25 Steep, •7X 0.25 - 0.35 Forest 0.2U - 0.30 Pasture 0.35 - 0.45 Cultivated Areas 0.5 - 0.7 Grass Channels 0.5 Steep Slopes (2:11 0.7 Land Use C Business b Industrial 0.7 - 0.9 Institutional 0.5 - 0.6 Residential Single Family 10,000 sf lot 0.40 - 0.50 12,000 sf lot 0.40 - 0.45 17,000 sf lot 0.35 - 0.45 1/2 acre lot 0.30 - 0.40 Multi-Family 0.65 - 0.75 Patkt 0.20 - 0.35 Note: Ground Cover "C" values are to be used for on-site while Land Use "C" values shat! be used for off-site drainage areas o Sources: VDOT Dralna4a Mawsl t Dasi4n and Coaatrvctbn of Sardtary and Storm Sawara, A FIG. 4 RUNOFF COEFFICIENTS Tro Rath py~K gatb Mas: Cures t/t ~ t/t. o/p 0.0 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 O.i 0.01 0.03 0.001 02 0.13 0.10 0.006 0.3 0.20 O.ti 0.017 0.4 0.27 0.31 0.035 O.S 0.33 O.N O.OiS 0.6 0.40 O.K O.t07 0.7 0.47 O.t2 O.ti3 o.e o.s3 os, o22a 0.9 0.60 0.9! 0.300 10 O.i7 100 0.375 ti 0.73 0.99 0.450 12 0.80 0.93 0.522 1.3 O.i7 O.ii 0.589 14 0.93 O.Ti 0.650 1S 100 0.68 0.705 t.i 107 0.51 0.751 17 113 0.4i 0.790 1a 120 0.39 o.a22 19 127 a33 o.a49 t.o 133 o2a o.a71 2.2 1.47 0.21 0.908 2.4 1i0 0.15 0.934 2.6 t73 O.n 0.953 Li U7 O.Oi 0.967 3.0 2.00 O.Oi 0.977 32 2.13 0.04 0.9x4 3.4 2.21 0.03 0.989 3.6 2.40 0.02 0.993 3.a 2.53 O.OtS 0.995 4.0 t.i7 O.Ot 0.997 4.5 3.00 O.OOS 0.999 S.0 3.33 0.00 1.000 Variables: t : Atrlroiro~hh fro t, • Iro of cena~ralloo y s t~aa ro Artear.a+ rsak 0 = M-droprapA fbw p = Poalc fbw 1cfs1 3o~rco: i~Nonal Enplnoorin~ tfa~ook VaNane 4 - Fflydrolo~r, U.S. DepartMat of A~ricuttur• - SoN Contorvatbn Service FIG. 5 UNIT HYDROGRAPH 30 25 20 F-- ~_ 15 W Q 10 5 0 15 SWCB Regui'tions 2.5 to 5.0 (100 yr.) x.5(100 yr.) 2(100 yr.) 100 yr. 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 INPOUNDMENT CAPACITY (acre - ft) Equivalency Chart; 1.5(100 yr.) : 0.3 PMF 2.01100 yra = 0.4 PMF 2.5(100 yr.1 = 0.5 PMF 5.01100 yr.) = 1.0 PMF 6 80 AQaptsd hoar Fakfax County Publc Fec~tles Menwl FIG. 6 SPILLWAY DESIGN STORM Channels ,with Erodible Linings Soil Type or Lining Permissible Velocity Fine Sand (noncotloidall 2.5 fps Sandy Loam (noncotloidat) 2.5 fpa Silt Loam (noncotioidal) 3.0 fps Ordinary Firm Loam 3.5 fps Fine Gravel 5.0 fps Stiff Ctay (very cotloidall 5.0 fps Graded, Loam to Cobble (noncoNoidall 5.0 fps Graded, Sift to Cobbles (nonco~oidall S.5 fps Alluvial Silts (noncolloidai) 3.5 fps AAuvial Silts (colloidal) 5.0 fps Coarse Gravel (noRCOgoidal) 6.0 fps Cobble and Shingles 5.5 fps Shales and Hard Pan 6.0 fps Note: Channels with erod~le Nnings apply to temporary channels, wldis Channels with grass cover apply to permanent channels Channels with Uniform Stand of Grass Cover Slope Permissible Velocity Cover Range Range ('/.1 8er~wda Grass 0 - S S.0 - 6.0 fps Fescue S - 10 4.0 - S.0 fps Kentucky Bluegrass t0 • 3.0 - 4.0 fps Grass Mixture 0 - 5 3.0 - 4.0 fps S- t 0 2.5 - 3.0 f p s Weeping lovegrass Kudzu AM~a A- S 2.0 - 3.0 fps Cratprass Con~a+ lss{-sdeza Sudan Graaa : Mghs~ Vsloclty shag bs far Erosion Resistsnt Solis while lows?r Vsdoclty sMN Ds used for Highly ErodfDle Soils t;ErodiDrtlty Factor, K, greater than 0.351 Source: Dssfon of Roadside Ct+annels. U. S. Department of Commerce IFIG. 7 CHANNEL VELOCITY LIMITS ~ Pipesx < 48" Provide 15' minimum width for the first 14' depthX with an additional 5' width for each additional 5' depth or part thereof. > 48" Provide 20' minimum width for the first 14' depth with an additional 5' width for each additional 5' depth or part thereof. Ditches: < 5' width Provide 15' minimum width. > 5' width Provide 15' minimum width plus the width of the ditch for the design storm. The ease- ment shall be offset such that a 10' ease- ment width is provided on one side of the ditcfi. X Pipe Sizes are for Equivalent Round Pipe Diameters using Manning's Equation at the same slope. x Depth is from ground surface to pipe invert. FIG. 8 DRAINAGE EASEMENT WIDTH Rstudanca Covu Condition Reed Canuygrau ExceNent stand, tall (36'1 ~ Bermudagra:s Mixture Good stand, tail (12'1 TaN Fstcw Good stand, unmowsd It8'i Lespsdesa Ssricea Good stand, not woody, taN 118'1 Grass-legun Mixture B TaN Fescue or Orchud Grass Good stand, uncut l20'1 Rss Canarygrass Good stand, mowed (12-16'1 weeping Lovegras: Good stand, mowed (13'1 Bermudagrass Mixture Good stand, mowed (6'1 Redtop Good stand, headed 113-20'1 Grass-legume mixture -taN, spring C (OrChud Graaa, Redtop, ItaNan Ryegrasa and Common Lespsdeza- Good stand, uncut 18-8'1 Kentucky Bluegrass Good stand, headed 16-12'1 Kentucky 31 TaN Fsscue Lespedeta Ssr~ea Good stand, headed 16-12'1 Bermuda Mixture Good stand, cut (2-3'1 Red Fsscus Good stand, headed 112-18'1 (crass-leg~xne mlxtur• -taN, sprMg D IOrchud Grass, Rsdtop, Itapan Ryegrsss and Common bspedeza) Good stand, uncut (4-5") Lsspedata Ssricea After cutting (up to 2') Kentucky Bluegrass Vary pod stand before cutting Kentucky 31 TaN Fescue Good stand, cut (~ tp 2 1/2'1 E Bermuda Mixture Good stand, cut lug to 1 1/2'I Bermuda Mixture Burned stubble Souroe: Gra::N Waterways and Oulists. Fisid EnglwaerMg Manuai, U.S. SoN Conservation Service, Coyle, J. J. I FIG. 9 N VALUES, GRASS CHANNELS 0 N r b N ~'f ~ A U_ N •~ A ~ m U ~ ~ ao N r d b ~ .U m .~ 0 ~ ~ • U 7 '~ O M ~ N O O O O O 00 c0 ~ ~ ~"~ N ~l'f ~ !") N ~ O O O O O ~ u s,suwww Source: Grssasd Wsterwsys snd thttets, Field EnpMeerin~ fNMwi, U.S. Soil Conservation Service, CoyN, J. J. FIG. 9-A N VALUES, GRASS DITCH EMERGENCY SPILLWAY DESIGN RECTANGULAR: 1-- B --~ T h ~. P L BROAD CRESTED WEIR: Q= C B h is Limitation: h/lh+P) <_ 0.35 See FIG. 15 for values of C SHARP CRESTED WEIR: Q = C B h ~.s Limitation: h/L ? 3.0 B/T C 1.0 3.221 0.401 (h/P1 0.9 3.205 0.342 (h/P1 0.8 3.194 0.241 (h/P1 0.7 3.183 + 0.161 (h/P) 0.6 3.173 0.096 (h/P) 0.5 3.167 + 0.056 (h/P) 0.4 3.162 0.031 Ih/P1 0.3 3.156 + 0.011 (h/PI 0.2 3.151 - 0.010 (h/P1 0.1 3.146 - 0.011 (h/P~ 0.0 3.140 - 0.012 (h/Pi Soma: Open-Chsnnei Mydru~ic:, French FIG. 10 SPILLWAY DESIGN J EMERGENCY SPILLWAY DESIGN TRIANGULAR: e h h T ;. P • ~ , BROAD CRESTED WEIR: Q=CXtan(1/2e1h2.s_ See FIG. 16 for values of C UPSTREAM SLOPE X Vertical 2.32 1/2:1 ~ 2.48 t:t 2.66 2: t 2.69 3:1 2.71 4:1 2.73 SHARP CRESTED WEIR: Q = 4.28 C tan (t/2 81 h2.s See FIG. it for values of C Source: Open-Channel Hydr~ugo:,_ Frsnch IFIG. 10-A SPILLWAY DESIGN ~ PRINCIPAL SPILLWAY DESIGN SHARP-EDGED ORIFICE D=CA 2gh SHAPE C O 0.60 Q 0.61 d 0.60 ~d 0.61 ~~ d td 0.62 d d i d ~~d 0.60 h _ CENTRO~ OF ORRICE OR TAILWATER hE;ICHT (WHICHEVER GREATESTI Source: IiytkWNc:. KUp, Wiskr lE Woo~urn I FIG. II SPILLWAY DESIGN I tis! •zt~ d~,aa ~~ p ~ N r' O O r ao N f+ O O O m O r ~ °~ O O N N O r O N a r V O a a ` • _ ~ o t ~ ~ c ~ O ~ o ~ . y O ~- ilO` . 4 N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c ~ o ~a L W w ~'~ 0 rn ~ 3 ;" E i~ o /sy co `" ~ ~ ~ o ~ a o f Li. ~ ~. > .- Q H ~ ~ U ~ o d ~ ~ ~ > ~~ ~~~ (~ V U ~-- -- ~ *' C ~ ~ 0 o a o a ~~NNf ~"~ ~LL~ 0 o ~ o 0 ~a~ 0 . oa Sou~or. Enoh-~In~ FNN Masnai. SCS FIG. 12 OUTLET PROTECTION (i~) atls ds~~ a D ~ N 0 O O r O O O O O O N O O r -a o c ~ 0 0 ~ c _ C ~ '_ O « . A ' y r ~~ m a U - w w 3 c E- ~ e o ~ o c ~ o u- I- ~ ~. c ~ > ~ v r U ~ ~ ~ o C ~ r d w ++ ; ~ Q O O O ~ Q Q. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a 0 O 0 ~ a ac O • J y o` o) ` o o f° .,°~ N a w v O O h O A t V 0 N 0 a Sodtcs: Eapina~~ Fkld MuwN. SCS FIG. '13 OUTLET PROTECTION DISCHARGE COEFFICIENTS fC) FOR RECTANGULAR BROAD CRESTED WEIRS s.eo 3.60 U ~ 3.40 Z W U 3.20 w ~ 3.00 w ~ 2.80 Q U 2.60 ~_ D 2.40 L 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 t8 2.0 h/L h P ,• ~ FIG. 14 DISCHARGE COEFFICIENTS DISCHARGE COEFFICIENTS (Cl FOR TRIANGULAR BROAD CRESTED WEIRS 0.99 0.97 0.9s 0.93 0.91 0.89 o.a7 o.as h/L FIG. 15 DISCHARGE COEFFICIENTS o., o.z o.3 0.4 ~.~ ..... DISCHARGE COEFFICIENTS (C) FOR TRIANGULAR SHARP CRESTED WEIRS O.S90 0.585 C O.S80 Notch Angle e, degrees 5~~; p{~~r MMssur~nt St~uotun~, Bo: ledl FIG. 16 DISCH. COEFFICIENT 20 40 60 vv O o E ~ c a~ o° N ~ FIG. 17 INFILTRATION TRENCHES Rational Method Q . C f (CA1 I Project Name: Sub-Area: - Time of Concentration: Overland: (Fig. 11 Length of Travel: "C" Value• To = min. Slope: Channel: (Fig. 21 Length of Travel: Height• T = min. Tc = min. C x CA x t t.0 Q : t0 ~ ~ ~o Q. ><.t ~ ~.i a.~ ,.rs ~ Anderson Method Project Name: Sub-Area: Area ISizel: _ X: Imperviousness (%I: - Flood Ratio: 100: 50: 25. 10: 5: 2: K: Storm Sewered: L(mi.): S(ft/mi): Lag Time IT): Q(1001: Qf5o1: Q(251: Q(1o1: Q15): Q121: Anderson Method Q:RI230lKAX T~ R =Flood Ratio -see Graph below K =Coefficient of Imperviousness 1.00 0.015 (II where I is the percentage of basin covered with impervious surface X =Basin Size Factor 1.0 0 for u p t o t s q. m i. 0.82 for over 1 sq. mi. A =Basin Area in sq. mi. T =lag Time in hours 4.64 IL,trS 1'~ for natural basins 0.90 (l~(~S10.f0 for 50'/. sewered basins 0.56 (L/~/-SI°~ for 100'/. sewered basins L =basin length in miles S =basin slope Ift/mil between points 10 and 85'/. of L from site 5 4 0 3 w 0 2 0 1 0 40 50 80 100 0 0 .~ a~ n E Anderson Method .t.~. vs L/~•. 2.a 2.2 2.0 1.8 1.6 1.4 0 F- 1.2 100 1.0 -~ 50 ~ a~ 0.8 ~ 25 ~ 0.6 0 0 0.4 0 1.0 1.5 0.5 2.0 L /~ Design Rainfalls ^ P!M • ttMabN Maxims Prtcipltation Source: Rainfall Frequency Atlas of the United States, Weather Bureau Runoff Curve Numbers Land Use Description Cultivated Land ~ without consstvatbn treatment ;with conssrvatbn treatment Pasture or range land :poor condttoa+ :good condition Mleadow :good conwition Wood or Forest land :thin stand, poor cover, no match ;good covert Open spaces, lawns, parks, plf counss, cse+stuie:, etc. good condition : gra:: cover on 1SX or ~nor• of iM usa fsk conditioe :Grass cover M SOX to 75X of the area Commsrciai and bwMiess areas t iSX hnpervious industrial districts l 12X impervbw 1 Rssldentiak 3 Average Lot Size Awrags X Nnpervious t/6 acre or ktt 65 t/4 acre 38 t/3 acre 30 t/2 acr• 25 t acre 20 Paved parking lots, roofs, driveways, etc. Hydrologic sot Group A g C D ~2 T2 81 85 S2 it 69 72 56 70 79 82 30 St 64 71 22 4a st s9 35 56 6a 75 18 45 60 68 30 51 64 Tt 39 59 70 76 S2 88 89 91 72 81 85 88 sa 77 a4 as St 66 75 60 47 62 72 79 44 50 11 77 41 5a 70 16 98 98 98 98 Streets and Roads: 98 98 98 98 Paved with curb and :form sewers !<7 77 82 i5 6ti+-M ~ 74 8ti !2 Girt t For a mor• dstaMsd de:criptfon of agricultural rand use curve Humbert refer to NEH-4 2 Good cover b pretsctsd from grasN+a Mttsr snd Druth cover 3 Curw ~wNnbsrs era eoMputsd usuadng tM runoff from the house snd driveway k directed towards tM street rich a a>~vwA of roof water directed to wwns astur• condition 4 TM rsataU+ing Nrvbw areas (lawns f are oonsiNrsd to bs M- good p far Mss Burrs der: Source: Technical Release No. 55 Soii Conservation Service TR-55 Lag-Tc Peak Discharge Method Protect: Location: g„~, _ or •------ - (2~ f-our ~ ~ ( _yr fraoj .____-- RahfaN .__-- Runoff Cure. No• fc _~- My~wlic L~ _--- J r,,af.r~-.d slop. x Hydr. Ln4tt-• Mom x _---- ~afVi01K /1rN K _._--- -- D~aMaM K ._---- PoMs. Sw~ 1.67 Constant X .- M _-- Basic Lw X Fiydr. Lngfh Ad1• X ---~-- Runoff Volutes X gyp. Ana Adj. csm/M hr ---'~- ----~ Basic Peak Disch. X Tc w ~ N Dr~~a Area X _.~-- x Pond, Swatapa Adj. cfs ADJUSTED PEA ~~~ --~- TR-55 Tabular Hydrograph Project. Location: ~` St+s~t _ of . DraMape Area V-b sq. Mi. Storrs FrsgwN+c:~Year: 2t-dour Deslq+ RainfaN IPI: .~-~_ DtveloQsd CN: Resultant Runoff (Cl: ~~_ A x 0: sq. s+i. - Mnchea peveloped Tc: _____~rtCM! ACTION NO. ITEM NO. /~7~ "'~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: January 8, 1991 AGENDA ITEM: ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE ACCEPTANCE AND ACQUISITION OF SURPLUS REAL ESTATE FROM THE ROANOKE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD, AND FURTHER, AUTHORIZING THE CONVEYANCE OF SAME TO VARIOUS OTHER PARTIES COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY• This ordinance authorizes the conveyance of certain real estate owned by the Roanoke County School Board to the Virginia Department of Transportation, the City of Salem Electric Department, Appalachian Power Company, and C & P Telephone Company for the construction and improvement of Route 460 West in Roanoke County. BACKGROUND• The Virginia Department of Transportation is in the process of acquiring right-of-way for the construction and improvement of Route 460 West in Roanoke County. VDOT is requesting from the School Board a temporary construction easement approximately twenty (20) feet wide in front of Fort Lewis Elementary School. The conveyance of this temporary construction easement will not interfere with any school programs. In addition, certain public utilities must be relocated as a result of this highway construction project. A permanent utility easement must be conveyed to the City of Salem (electric department). This easement measures 20' by 45'. A permanent utility easement for Appalachian Power Company then continues across the front of the Fort Lewis Elementary School property. A permanent utility easement for C & P Telephone Company extends across the front of the school property in conjunction with the City of Salem and APCo easements. These utilities will share common utility poles. VDOT has offered to pay $2,383 for the acquisition of a temporary construction easement, utility easement, metal rail, landscaping and any and all damages. State law requires that the School Board declare this property 1 y'~ to be surplus and to convey it to the County Board of Supervisors. The County in turn would then convey this property to the various other parties. FISCAL IMPACTS• The sum of $2,383 shall be paid to the County and be deposited in the School Capital Outlay Fund. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Board favorably consider the adoption of this ordinance. Respectfully submitted, Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney Action Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by Eddy Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers Vote No Yes Abs 2 N- AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JANUARY 8, 1991 ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE ACCEPTANCE AND ACQUISITION OF SURPLUS REAL ESTATE FROM THE ROANOKE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD, AND FURTHER, AUTHORIZING THE CONVEYANCE OF SAME TO VARIOUS OTHER PARTIES BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter, the acquisition and disposition of real estate can be authorized only by ordinance. A first reading of this ordinance was held on January 8, 1991; and a second reading was held on January 22, 1991. 2. That the County School Board of Roanoke County on December 6, 1990, adopted a resolution declaring twenty (20) feet of the Fort Lewis Elementary School property to be surplus property pursuant to Section 22.1-129 of the Code of Virginia (1950), as amended. 3. That the acceptance and acquisition of certain real estate located in front of the Fort Lewis Elementary School along State Route 460 as further identified on Sheets 8 and 9 of the plans for Route 460, State Highway Project 0460-129-104 PE101, from the Roanoke County School Board is hereby authorized. 4. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.01 of the Charter of Roanoke County, the subject real estate is being made available to the Commonwealth of Virginia and various public utilites for other public uses, namely, improvements to State Route 460. ~`-/- / 5. That the offer of the Virginia Department of Transportation in the amount of $2,383.00 for the acquisition of a temporary construction easement, utility easements, metal rail, landscaping and any and all damages is hereby accepted and shall be credited to the School Capital Outlay Fund, and the conveyance of the real estate described above to the Virginia Department of Transportation, the City of Salem Electric Department, Appalachian Power Company, and C & P Telephone Company for other public uses is hereby authorized and approved. 6. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized to execute such documents and take such actions as may be necessary to accomplish these transactions, all of which shall be on form approved by the County Attorney. s ' ACTION NUMBER ITEM NUMBER ~~ ` 7 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: January 8, 1991 SUBJECT: Appointments to Committees, Commissions and Boards COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF 1rdFORMATION: 1. Board of Zoning Appeals Five-year term of M. E. Maxey, Vinton Magisterial District expired June 30, 1990. 2. Building Code Board of Adjustments and Appeals Four-year term of Wilmore T. Leffell, expired December 12, 1990. Mr. Leffell is from the Vinton Magisterial District and is a building contractor. 3. Grievance Panel Three-year term of R. Vincent Reynolds, Alternate, expired September 10, 1990. Mr. Reynolds has been appointed to serve as a regular member of the Grievance Panel and the alternate position is now vacant. 4. Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission Unexpired tlrir.ee-year term of James Bryant, Hollins Magisterial District. His term will expire June•30, 1991. SUBMITTED BY: Mary H. Allen Clerk to the Board APPROVED BY: ~ ~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator .. r ..~~-y Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) Motion by: ACTION Eddy Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers VOTE No Yes Abs F~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JANUARY 8, 1991 RESOLUTION R-1891-4 APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM R - CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. that the certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for January 8, 1991, designated as Item K - Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 6, inclusive, as follows: 1. Approval of Minutes - December 4, 1990 2. Confirmation of Committee Appointments to the Planning Commission and Recycling Advisory Committee. 3. Request for acceptance of Glade Hill Circle and Cundiff Drive into the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System. 4. Request for acceptance of Arabian Lane and Filly Court into the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System. 5. Acceptance of Meadow Valley Circle into the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System. 6. Donation of sanitary sewer, water and storm drain easements from Timberline Condominium Associates. 2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this resolution. On motion of Supervisor Nickens, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors CC: File Phillip Henry, Director of Engineering Clifford Craig, Director of Utilities [O AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JANUARY 8, 1991 RESOLUTION APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM R - CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. that the certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for January 8, 1991, designated as Item K - Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in sated section designated Items 1 through 6, inclusive, as follows: 1. Approval of Minutes - December 4, 1990 2. Confirmation of Committee Appointments to the Planning Commission and Recycling Advisory Committee. 3. Request for acceptance of Glade Hill Circle and Cundiff Drive into the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System. 4. Request for acceptance of Arabian Lane and Filly Court into the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System. 5. Acceptance of Meadow Valley Circle into the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System. 6. Donation of sanitary .sewer, water and storm drain easements from Timberline Condominium Associates. 2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this resolution. ACTION NO. A-1891-4.a ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: January 8, 1991 AGENDA ITEM: Confirmation of Committee Appointments to the Planning Commission and Recycling Advisory Committee COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The following nominations were made at the December 18, 1990 meeting and should be confirmed by the Board of Supervisors: Planning Commission Supervisor Nickens nominated Kyle Robinson to serve a four-year term representing the Vinton Magisterial District. His term will expire December 31, 1994. Recycling Advisory Committee Supervisor Eddy nominated April Yow to represent the business community. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the above nominations be confirmed. SUBMITTED B`1: APPROVED BY: Mary H. Allen Elmer C. Hodge Clerk to the Board County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved (x) Motion by: Harry C. Nickens No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Eddy x Received ( ) Johnson x Referred ( ) McGraw x To ( ) Nickens x Robers x cc: File Planning Commission File Recycling Advisory Committee File , .- ~,; AT THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JANUARY 8, 1991 RESOLUTION 1891-4.b REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF GLADE HILL CIRCLE AND CIINDIFF DRIVE INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That this matter came this day to be heard upon the proceedings herein, and upon the application of Glade Hill Circle, from its intersection with Carson Road, South to the cul-de-sac, for a distance of 0.06 miles, and Cundiff Drive, from its intersection with Carson Road, South to the cul-de-sac, for a distance of 0.23 miles to be accepted and made a part of the Secondary System of State Highways under Section 33.1-229 of the Virginia State Code. 2. That it appears to the Board that drainage easements and a fifty (50) foot right-of-way for said road have heretofore been dedicated by virtue of a certain map known as Glade Hill Estates Section 1 Subdivision which map was recorded in Plat Book 11, Page 33, of the records of the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, on October 4, 1990 and that by reason of the recordation of said map no report from a Board of Viewers, nor consent or donation of right-of-way from the abutting property owners is necessary. The Board hereby guarantees said right-of- way for drainage. 3. That said roads known as Glade Hill Circle and Cundiff Drive and which is shown on a certain sketch accompanying this Resolution, be, and the same are hereby established as public roads to become a part of the State Secondary System of Highways in Roanoke County, only from and after notification of official acceptance of said street or highway by the Virginia Department of Transportation. On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, Nickens, McGraw NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: ~" Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Phillip Henry, Director, Engineering Arnold Covey, Director, Development & Inspections, and copy for Virginia Department of Transportation ITEM NUMBER ~" AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: JANUARY $, 1991 SUBJECT: Acceptance of Glade Hill Circle and Cundiff Drive into the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SITNIlyARY OF INFORMATION J. F. Davis, the developer of Glade Hill Estates Section 1, requests that the Board of Supervisors approve a resolution to the Virginia Department of Transportation requesting that they accept Glade Hill Circle, from its intersection with Carson Road, South to the cul-de-sac, for a distance of 0.06 mile, and Cundiff Drive, from its intersection with Carson Road, south to the cul- de-sac, for a distance of 0.23 miles. The staff has inspected this road along with representatives of the Virginia Department of Transportation and find the road is acceptable. FISCAL IMPACT- No county funding is required. RECOMMENDATIONS: The staf f recommends the Virginia Department accept Glade Hill Circle Road System. SUBMITTED BY: ~~~ Phillip T. Henry, P E. Director of Engineering that the Board approve a resolution to of Transportation requesting that they and Cundiff Drive into the Secondary APPROVED: ~~~ ? rfu~ Elmer C. Ho ge County Administrator /~ -~ Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs Motion by: Eddy Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers ~f -3 NORTH PROPOSED ADDITION SHOWN IN GRAY DESCRIPTION: -n D 1). Cundiff Drive from the intersection of Carson Road ~ ~ {Route 758) to the cul-de-sac. Z ~ 2). Glade Hill Circle from the intersection of Ca rson Road (Route 758) to the cul-de-sac. D '; LENGTH: 0.23 miles p ~ RIGHT-OF-WAY: 50 feet ` -- -~ - ~ ROADWAY WIDTH: 31 ee ~ ~38 .~ 31 80 g6 35 g~- ~l•~71 14 .•32 ~ SURFACE WIDTH: ~ 3' ° 26 feet ~ N , N }*~„~ 3~ ~~ SERVICE: $ • 27 homes ~ ~` 7 •O b •0 SS ~~9.6 •q ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~. r LENGTH: 0.06 miles ~~ ~ 31' RIGHT-OF-WAY: ~ 50 feet ~ 1 " tis~ \ 'L \3 rROADWAY WIDTH: 1 'J~ ~ z~. A` \g ' ~ 6 31 26 feet feet P x \ \ ~ SURFACE WIDTH: \ ~ \ ( \ ~'~ II ~ . „ 12 ' 13 • 14 • 15 '- 16 ~ ~ •" ~~ ~ SERVICE : ~ 10 homes If •a a p z `$ ~ „9 •o •0 0 1 ~~ o I \ ~ 9 N 9 9 ~ ~ 8 1 ~ .6 I :29 ~ • 1931 ~ ~ • `' I _ ~ • ~ • n 6 ~1 • _ ~ ISL •3 j9 .\9 d I Zg 8 - „ i ~ 0 ZO •2 4 ~ ~ 2~ ~ ~• I ~ y ~'\.. 2. 3 . 1 s ~ ~~s.s o,..• Aso 2 a v • • ~- N e ~ Z .Z\ w 11 p IS6 ~ I •o.N •QII 941 . ~ ~/.•) ZZ I • ~ + g 22 a • ~ 2 I I s~~, ,o • yO 25 pc ~° .; " Z~ Z ~ 23 ,° =l0 1•L Oa Acceptance of Glade hill Circle and Cundiff Drive into the Virginia Department of Transportation $NGIlVBBRING Secondary System 3 ~='- ~~~ r ~~ w AT THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JANUARY 8, 1991 RESOLUTION REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF GLADE HILL CIRCLE AND CUNDIFF DRIVE INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That this matter came this day to be heard upon the proceedings herein, and upon the application of Glade Hill Circle, from its intersection with Carson Road, South to the cul- de-sac, for a distance of 0.06 miles, and Cundiff Drive, from its intersection with Carson Road, South to the cul-de-sac, for a distance of 0.23 miles to be accepted and made a part of the Secondary System of State Highways under Section 33.1-229 of the Virginia State Code. 2. That it appears to the Board that drainage easements and a fifty (50) foot right-of-way for said road have heretofore been dedicated by virtue of a certain map known as Glade Hill Estates Section 1 Subdivision which map was recorded in Plat Book 11, Page 33, of the records of the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, on October 4, 1990 and that by reason of the recordation of said map no report from a Board of Viewers, nor consent or donation of right-of-way from the abutting property owners is necessary. The Board hereby guarantees said right-of-way for drainage. 4 ~- 3. That said roads known as Glade Hill Circle and Cundiff Drive and which is shown on a certain sketch accompanying this Resolution, be, and the same are hereby established as public roads to become a part of the State Secondary System of Highways in Roanoke County, only from and after notification of official acceptance of said street or highway by the Virginia Department of Transportation. 5 r t ~~..,. . t AT THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JANUARY 8, 1991 RESOLUTION 1891-4.C REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF ARABIAN LANE AND FILLY COURT INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That this matter came this day to be heard upon the proceedings herein, and upon the application of Arabian Lane from Newport Road (Rt 624) to the intersection of Filly Court for a distance of 0.69 miles and Filly Court from Arabian Lane to the cul-de-sac for a distance of 0.16 miles to be accepted and made a part of the Secondary System of State Highways under Section 33.1- 229 of the Virginia State Code. 2. That it appears to the Board that drainage easements and a fifty (50) foot right-of-way for said roads have heretofore been dedicated by virtue of a certain map\maps known as Section 1 Equestrian Hills Subdivision which map was recorded in Plat Book 11, Page 149, of the records of the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, on May 24, 1989 and that by reason of the recordation of said map no report from a Board of Viewers, nor consent or donation of right-of-way from the abutting property owners is necessary. The Board hereby guarantees said right-of-way for drainage. ~ ~ I * .. 3. That said roads known as Arabian Lane & Filly Court and which are shown on a certain sketch accompanying this Resolution, be, and the same are hereby established as a public roads to become a part of the State Secondary System of Highways in Roanoke County, only from and after notification of official acceptance of said streets or highways by the Virginia Department of Transportation. On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, Nickens, McGraw NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Phillip Henry, Director, Engineering Arnold Covey, Director, Development & Inspections, and copy for Virginia Department of Transportation ITEM NUMBER-?~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: January 8, 1991 SUBJECT: Acceptance of Arabian Lane and Filly Court into the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: WPG Partnership the developer of Section 1, Equestrian Hills Subdivision, requests that the Board of Supervisors approve a resolution to the Virginia Department of Transportation requesting that they accept 0.16 miles of Filly Court from the intersection of Arabian Lane to the cul-de-sac, and 0.69 miles of Arabian Lane from Rt. 624 (Newport Road) to Filly Lane. The staff has inspected these representatives of the Virginia Department find the roads are acceptable. Bond in the will be retained by Roanoke County for landscaping required next spring. FISCAL IMPACT- No county funding is required. RECOMMENDATIONS: roads along with of Transportation and amount of 55,000.00 final shaping and The staff recommends that the Board approve a resolution to the Virginia Department of Transportation requesting that they accept Arabian Lane and Filly Court into the Secondary Road System. ~ - ~' SUBMITTED BY: ~~~' ~~~ Phillip Henry, E. Director of Engin ering Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by: APPROVED: Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs Eddy Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers ~~ f Z..r NORTS ,~ h N 2 ~ ~ 3`~ ~ ' ~?~ ~ ~ s 4 ~ ej4 s. eeee .. * +a • ~ t/ ~~ ~.1e'~ i Nj ~JJ t~S Zy ~~ ~~~'~ ~~ „ . eo~~ av.~ ~ Q 3.~~ ~'~(OJ /~ et ~ ?.~ N. ,i0~ ~. • p t 7~~ ~==s p ~~ ~.~ sib rot ar» 3 t ~- + ~ ~~4 ~ ~~ ~ 4 ~•~ ~S ~1 e~4 ~i ~ i ~ ~~, ~ +.3i,4 ~ ~~,~ ~ ~.~ . e4 J,~ M ,r ~ t • ~ ~ s.~ ~.~,t ~ ~ ... ~• , _ "'` • '"~ ~ ~`a"` ~ i Q ~4 1~osm ADDTIC~1 S[~owN at c~ l.~0 •.0~ ~2j ~~~ ~ h b DF,SGR~1~: + ~.+ +~ s° ~•#~:~ 4 1. Arabian Lane from the intersection of Newport Road ~ -~.• .• ~'~ • (Rt 624) to the intersection of Filly Court. t e r/ 2. Filly Court from the intersection of Arabian Lane to; ~. the cul-de-sac. .~ ~a use ~ <'~'~co~ sib Length; (1) Miles 0.69 (2) Miles 0.16 ~ 4 Right of Way: (1) Feet 50 (2) Feet 50 ~ + •~ ¢ Roadway Width: (1) Feet 30 (2) Feet 29 ~ '~` Surface Width: (1) Feet 20 (2) Feet 20 ~ ,~ Service: (1) Homes 3 (2) Homes 3 ~+~ 3 ; ~ ~~ Rt. ~~ ~.1 ~ ~,,d o ~~ o e it •_ _ :: _ ~~ Vie.. .U.. se.. ~, ..~,,~ Acceptance of Arabian Larre and Filly Court into SNGINBBRIIYG the Virginia Department of ZYansportation Secondaiv System. /~- L/ AT THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE HOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JANUARY 8, 1991 RESOLUTION REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF ARABIAN LANE AND FILLY COURT INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That this matter came this day to be heard upon the proceedings herein, and upon the application of Arabian Lane from Newport Road (Rt 624) to the intersection of Filly Court for a distance of 0.69 miles and Filly Court from Arabian Lane to the cul-de-sac for a distance of 0.16 miles to be accepted and made a part of the Secondary System of State Highways under Section 33.1-229 of the Virginia State Code. 2. That it appears to the Board that drainage easements and a fifty (50) foot right-of-way for said roads have heretofore been dedicated by virtue of a certain map\maps known as Section 1 Equestion Hills Subdivision which map was recorded in Plat Book 11, Page 149, of the records of the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, on May 24, 1989 and that by reason of the recordation of said map no report from a Board of Viewers, nor consent or donation of right-of-way from the abutting property owners is necessary. The Board hereby guarantees said right-of-way for drainage. ~-` '~ 3. That said roads known as Arabian Lane & Filly Court and which are shown on a certain sketch accompanying this Resolution, be, and the same are hereby established as a public roads to become a part of the State Secondary System of Highways in Roanoke County, only from and after notification of official acceptance of said streets or highways by the Virginia Department of Transportation. ~ _ _ ~, AT THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VICENTER~ONETUESDAYH,,EJANUARYE8CO1991 ADMINISTRATION RESOLUTION 1891-4.d REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF MEADOW VALLEY CIRCLE INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That this matter came this day to be heard upon the proceedings herein, and upon the application of Meadow Valley Circle, from a point 450 feet South of its intersection with Meadow Creek Drive to the cul-de-sac, for a distance of .07 mile to be accepted and made a part of the Secondary System of State Highways under Section 33.1-229 of the Virginia State Code. 2. That it appears to the Board that drainage easements and a fifty (50) foot right-of-way for said road have heretofore been dedicated by virtue of a certain map known as Meadow Creek Section 4 Subdivision which map was recorded in Plat Book 12, Page 118, of the records of the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, on April 26, 1990 and that by reason of the recordation of said map no report from a Board of Viewers, nor consent or donation of right-of-way from the abutting property owners is necessary. The Board hereby guarantees said right-of- way for drainage. 3. That said road known as Meadow Valley Circle and which is shown on a certain sketch accompanying this Resolution, be, and the same are hereby established as a public road to become a part of the State Secondary System of Highways in Roanoke County, only from and after notification of official acceptance of said street or highway by the Virginia Department of Transportation. On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, Nickens, McGraw NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Phillip Henry, Director, Engineering Arnold Covey, Director, Development & Inspections, and copy for Virginia Department of Transportation ITEM NUMBER ~ '~ ..~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: JANUARY 8, 1991 SUBJECT: Acceptance of Meadow Valley Circle into the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Virgil E., Dwayne E. & Merle A. Jamison, Partnership the developer of Meadow Creek Section 4, requests that the Board of Supervisors approve a resolution to the Virginia Department of Transportation requesting that they accept Meadow Valley Circle, from a point 450 feet south of its intersection with Meadow Creek Drive to the cul-de-sac, for a distance of .07 mile. The staff has inspected this road along with representatives of the Virginia Department of Transportation and find the road is acceptable. FISCAL IMPACT• No county funding is required. RECOMMENDATIONS: The staff recommends that the Board approve a resolution to the VDOT requesting that they accept Meadow Valley Circle into the Secondary Road System. SUBMITTED BY: Phillip Henry, P E. Director of Engineering APPROVED9: ~'/////J/// ~ J/ ~'~ ! _/r",} `ice ~ Imo/ ~, Elme1/r YC. Hodge County Administrator ~`~ Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by: ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs Eddy Johnson McGraw Nickens Robers 5 NORTS 3 67,/7 ~, , ACCEPTANCE OF MEADOW VALLEY CIRCLE INTO THE BNGINBERING VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM. AT THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JANUARY 8, 1991 RESOLUTION REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF MEADOW VALLEY CIRCLE INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That this matter came this day to be heard upon the proceedings herein, and upon the application of Meadow Valley Circle, from a point 450 feet South of its intersection with Meadow Creek Drive to the cul-de-sac, for a distance of .07 mile to be accepted and made a part of the Secondary System of State Highways under Section 33.1-229 of the Virginia State Code. 2. That it appears to the Board that drainage easements and a fifty (50) foot right-of-way for said road have heretofore been dedicated by virtue of a certain map known as Meadow Creek Section 4 Subdivision which map was recorded in Plat Book 12, Page 118, of the records of the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, on April 26, 1990 and that by reason of the recordation of said map no report from a Board of Viewers, nor consent or donation of right-of-way from the abutting property owners is necessary. The Board hereby guarantees said right-of-way for drainage. -,~ 3. That said road known as Meadow Valley Circle and which is shown on a certain sketch accompanying this Resolution, be, and the same are hereby established as a public road to become a part of the State Secondary System of Highways in Roanoke County, only from and after notification of official acceptance of said street or highway by the Virginia Department of Transportation. 2 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. A-1891-4.e ~"'~ "" AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: January 8, 1991 AGENDA ITEM: Donation of sanitary sewer, water and storm drain easements in connection with the westerly portion of Lot 15, Section 3, Map of Southern Pines (P.B. 2, Page 138) from Timberline Condominium Associates to the County of Roanoke COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: This consent agenda item involves the donation of the following easements to the County of Roanoke for sanitary sewer, water and storm drain easements in connection with the westerly portion of Lot 15, Section 3, Map of Southern Pines (P.B. 2, Page 138) in the Cave Spring Magisterial District from Timberline Condominium Associates (Deed Book 1174, Page 669; Tax Map No. 87.19-3-45), all as shown on a plat prepared by Buford T. Lumsden & Associates, P.C., dated 12 November 1990: a) CENTERLINE OF NEW 20' SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT NO. 1: Beginning at corner 2, said corner being the centerline of an existing 15' Sanitary Sewer Easement; thence S. 75° 30' 00" E. 305.00 feet to corner 7, as shown on the aforesaid plat. b) CENTERLINE OF NEW 20' SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT NO. 2: Beginning at corner 3, said corner being the centerline of an existing 15' Sanitary Sewer Easement; thence N. 83° 45' 00" E. 118.00 feet to corner 4; thence N. 24° 05' 00" E. 145.00 feet to corner 5; thence S. 66° 15' 00" E. 383.50 feet to corner 6, as shown on the aforesaid plat. c) CENTERLINE OF NEW 20' WATER LINE EASEMENT NO. 1: Beginning at corner A, said corner being on the northerly line of original Lot 15, Sec. 3, Southern Pines; thence S. 24° 05' 00" W. 125.00 feet; thence S. 03° 15' 00" W., passing corner C at 30.0 feet, in all a total distance of 106.00 feet to corner D; thence S. 04° 20' 00" E., ~- Co passing corner E at 159.00 feet, in all a total distance of 173.00 feet to corner F; thence S. 03° 30' 00" W. 143.50 feet to corner G, as shown on the aforesaid plat. d) CENTERLINE OF NEW 20' WATER LINE EASEMENT NO. 2: Beginning at corner C, said corner being on the center- line of Water Line Easement No. 1, hereinabove described; thence S. 86° 45' 00" E. 43.00 feet to corner I, as shown on the aforesaid plat. e) CENTERLINE OF NEW 20' WATER LINE EASEMENT NO. 3: Beginning at corner E, said corner being on the center- line of Water Line Easement No. 1, hereinabove described; thence S. 85° 40' 00" W. 32.00 feet to Corner H, as shown on the aforesaid plat. f) CENTERLINE OF NEW 20' WATER LINE EASEMENT NO. 4: Beginning at corner J, said corner being on the center- line of Water Line Easement No. 1, hereinabove described; thence S. 65° 55' 00" E. 35.00 feet to Corner K, as shown on the aforesaid plat. g) CENTERLINE OF NEW STORM DRAIN EASEMENT NO. 1: Beginning at corner A2, said corner being on the centerline of an existing 15' Drainage Easement; thence with a curved line to the left, whose bearing is S. 51° 00' 00" E., an arc distance of 97.00 feet to corner A3; thence S. 05° 00' 00" W. 17.00 feet to Corner A4, as shown on the aforesaid plat. h) CENTERLINE OF NEW 15' STORM DRAIN EASEMENT NO. 2: Beginning at corner A5, said corner being on the norther- ly line of Buck Mountain Road, S. W. (Va. Sec. Rt. #679); thence N. 48° 35' 00" W. 19.00 feet to corner A6; thence N. 03 ° 45' 00" E. 145.00 feet to corner A7; thence N. 23 ° 45' 00" W. 122.00 feet to Corner A8, as shown on the aforesaid plat. The location and dimensions of these easements have been reviewed and approved by the County's engineering staff. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends acceptance of these properties. Respectfully submitted, Vicki L. Huffm Assistant County Attorney S~ Action Approved (x) Motion by Harry C. Nickens Eddy Denied ( ) Johnson Received ( ) McGraw Referred Nickens to Robers :c : File Phillip T. Henry, Director, Engineering Clifford D. Craig, Director, Utilities Vote No Yes Abs x x x x x .. ~~ , ~ !4 I r3 rZ ~ , rJ ~ JO I 9 I 8 SEGr/ON +3, ~iOUIHEaN AIlN~S" P. 9. 2 P6. r~8 /liE L~NF) ~cXrgr /§' SAN+IARy SE-~' EASfMENr I-I Exr4r. r5'~.E. i t N ?4°05'OO "~, 595.7~'lr rac) --_- ~~--_--=--- - f _ ~/ 2l ire' \~\ ~' ` a J, / ~ -~ t t z a ea I ~-_"'t~ lam- ~~\\ -Q ~ S?4'05'N •.: _ --a, ~,1~, ~ -- __ -- - 94.0'. N tm U ~ ~______ ~~ _.,-___ z 1~ i I ,~`~' 0 1 t ew/ ~ i~ .' ~ n I ~ ~ a _~ a ~~ ~i%, ~ J ~' lilt x a A o~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ I I m ~ .~ R1 y o I C ~ ~ Z yl '9 ~ ~~' '/ ~. ~ 1 p" ~ -r .e~-'T I a -~ T a' O 1 o A I ~Z ~ a~ 1 1 -n ma ~' ~~ I IA zoo + oA ~ ~ ~ 2 m 6~ I Iv. ~V,jO_ pa 2 i O --. c+ D - _ m s -• z4q•43~ a ~', 113 ~' ° 50 ~ ~ I m ~ ~ ~ b 1 ~ ~~~~ ~~ ~ m I I~ A .,, o ~` I I v, Eb o I /P aoPEatS~~~AI~ ~ ~ X07.°' .~ _ I P W 1~ ~~Y{IU5a7- ~' --S?4°05'00"h', a, 22Q.00'(TG%) --- ~'"~ DRIVE 5 lu /Sn~al,vl I } C T O 9 O 1 m a ~ C Zmt3i~ x ~ m T .~ Z 5 C R`' rt~1 D 2 '.< y D ~~ ~ d`~ m N n n D m I I 0 0 D 1 N z 0 Cd t*] ;Il 0 ~~ v~ao°~P ~ zlnpy „ 9ti~N ad Ntl'~ baW ya ao ~ 1~' ro ~ n M ~ 3 Z ° ~ O m H n m~ H ~ o [n O ;a r i N rn m ro x 'T] C- 70 0 7~ LT] Z C7 bJ - z z o x ~" H ° ~ o O c ~ ro Z~ Hc~n 7ozz ~y r ~ ~ z ~ ~ v ~ nm H c c ~ ~ ~ 1 ~O 3 ~ ~ ~ H y r D O c n cn L TI z i - G nrz ~ " ~ ~' H ro o rn H~ H ~ ~ CC 3 ~~ D ~ ~ ~ Oro m O H cn to ~r zon 7co mn N m ~ w H O z H z-I n ~ z ~ ~~ H ~ H CTJ -{ n m H r (n w co v n a~ a a V O. ' W N n a a n n m V rn ~- w n ~ z A n =m= m ~ r' Z m z z z z z G N O .F O lT m e o ~e o e m Cn .c .F w o a ~o ~ ~ v~ v~ v, o . - a ~ .3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p a E m F m ~E a 0 z V ~ m T t0 V N f w a O o 0 0 o s y 0 0 0 0 0 = ~ ~^ m '-'I ~~ ~` ~ O - v ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~\ ~_ ~I m z I ~ ~ I <n ~ W N o m O T L V z ~ • t 1 " m _ a z w 2 S w m O• N m V ~ m Oo m I ~ T ° ° o o - .o c W a A (n n in v+ cn o z o z . _ 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 n e ~ m m m m ~ to w - - W = ~ I m.F-o w m ~ w tT Oo [T -i a ~, v, o 0 o oooo z c~ m m D N m 3 z n r, m ~ m n m v m a o z x a c> m v m z -+ I m m z ~ r w w w w w N Z 2 1 m m m o 0 o N m N~ lT O. W o o F m ~ T V• c C w N~ 0 Jo v+ o v. o o ~+ ~_ = K 0 c~ ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0000000 m f m~ m E m r _ o z w w .F ~ v o N m fT N'. W w W O• (T w 0 0 0 fn o 0 o a y 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ N ~- 4~ 1U1111111111111~IIIilllllilllllllllllllllllllllllillilillllllllllllllilillllllllllilllilillllillllllllllllllllllllllliillllllllll~ _ _ _ _ _ _ APPEARANCE RE UEST _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ AGENDA ITEM NO. , ~~ ~! ~. ~~ ~ - _ _ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supex~isors to = recognize me during the public hearin on the above matter = so that I ma comment.WHEN CALLS TO THE PODIUM, I WILL GI E MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE _ _ RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES = _= LISTED BELOW. c • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will = _- decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. _ _ • Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Ques- c __ bons of cl ' 'cation may be entertained by the Chairman. __ • All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized - speaker and audience members is not allowed. • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. c • Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments c with the clerk, c • INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FQR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION _ FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. _ = _ PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO DEPUTY CLERK _ _ NAME ~ ~' ~ " ._ ~ - " _ ._ __ __ -~ ADDRESS ~ ~ ~ ~!~ ° ~' % ~'..5~~~,~~ ~~ i~~~, PHONE ;~ ~/- ~ ~~/ 5 '~ 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 ~ ulillllllllllllliilillllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllillllllllllllllllllllllllliilllillilllllillllilllllllllllilllllilllili~ _ - APPEARANCE RE VEST _ Q _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ AGENDA ITEM NO. ~~l- ~ ,~ - SUBJECT ~ -~ -~ .,. _ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supex~isors to recognize me during the public hearing on the above matter h I ma comment.WHEN CALLED TO THE PODIUM _ sot at y _ I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES -_ LISTED BELOW. '_ • Each s Baker will be iven between three to five minutes to comment c _ P g whether speaking as an individual or representative. The chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the maiority of the Board to do otherwise. • Speakers will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Ques- tions of cl ' 'cation may be entertained by the Chairman. __ • All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized Qneaker and audience members is not allowed. • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. • Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. • INDIVIDUALS PURPORTING TO SPEAK FQR AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. =_ PRI T LE IBLY AND GIVE TO DEPUTY CLERK c _ PLEASE N G _ __ - . ;~ NAME .~ ~t ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ IIIIIIIIIIIIIIilllllllllllllillllillllllllllllllllllllilillllillllillilillllllillilllllllillllllililllilillli ~'--/ COUNTY OF ROANORE, VIRGINIA CAPITAL FUND UNAPPROPRIATED BALANCE Audited Balance at July 1, 1990 December 18, 1990 Back Creek Fire and Rescue Station Balance as of January 8, 1991 Submitted by a ~' f~~~ $ 6,987 (6,987) $ -0- Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance -~,rf.I COUNTY OF ROANORE, VIRGINIA GENERAL FUND UNAPPROPRIATED BALANCE Audited Balance at July 1, 1990 7/1/90 Amount reimbursed by County Schools 9/25/90 Appropriation to Police Department 9/25/90 Rescinding Parks and Recreation User Fees 11/13/90 Allied Signal 11/13/90 Read Mountain Fire Station 12/4/90 VDOT Matching Funds 12/4/90 Legal Fees for Dixie Caverns 12/4/90 Expansion of CORTRAN Service 12/18/90 Back Creek Fire and Rescue Station Balance as of January 8, 1991 $ of General~l~ Amount Fund Expenditures $5,653,756 500,000 (200,000) (85, 421) (875,000) (174,886) (347,500) (186,850) (5,000) (9, 700) $4,269,399 Submitted by ~~.~~ Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance 6.25 Note: On December 18, 1990 the Board of Supervisors adopted a goal statement to maintain the General Fund Unappropriated Balance at 6.25 of General Fund expenditures ($68,310,395). ~- COIINTY OF ROANORE, VIRGINIA REBERVE FOR BOARD CONTINGENCY Beginning Balance at July 1, 1990 $ 50,000 August 28, 19 90 Roanoke County Code Book Supplement (9,845) September 25, 1990 Contribution to TAP - Transitional Living Center (15,000) September 25, 1990 Contribution to Darrell Shell Scholarship (1,000) October 23, 1990 Replacement of lost State Revenues for the Arts (4,250) November 13, 1990 Attorney fees for cable tv negotiations (6,800) December 18, 1990 Back Creek Fire and Rescue station (5,574) Balance as of January 8, 1991 $ 7,531 Submitted by Diane D. HyattO Director of Finance ,a AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JANUARY 8, 1991 RESOLUTION 1891-5 CERTIFYING EXECUTIVE MEETING WAS HELD IN CONFORMITY WITH THE CODE OF VIRGINIA WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia has convened an executive meeting on this date pursuant to an affirmative recorded vote and in accordance with the provisions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and WHEREAS, Section 2.1-344.1 of the Code of Virginia requires a certification by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that such executive meeting was conducted in conformity with Virginia law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby certifies that, to the best of each members knowledge: 1. Only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements by Virginia law were discussed in the executive meeting which this certification resolution applies, and 2. Only such public business matters as were identified in the motion convening the executive meeting were heard, discussed or considered by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Robers, Johnson, Nickens, McGraw NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: `y')') cc~L~ ~ Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Executive Session ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER Q `' f AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKEr COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: January 8, 1991 AGENDA ITEM: Joint Work Session with Planning Commission Capital Improvement Program COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS• SUMMARY OF INFORMATION This time has been scheduled for a work session with the Planning Commission on the 1992-1996 CIP. Because it is a lengthy document, the report has been distributed to the board members separately. I am very pleased with the format of the report and the effort put into the report by the staff . The challenge will be in setting priorities for funding of the projects. Budget reductions from the state and changing economic conditions may make it necessary to postpone a number of these projects, but there is a real benefit to using this for future planning. The document is in draft form and this is the first of many meetings on the CIP. Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Eddy Received ( ) Johnson Referred ( ) McGraw To ( ) Nickens Robers of aoaNO~,~ ~ ,w Z A J 2 a 18 E50 88 ~FSQUICENTENN~P~ A Beauti ful Beginning COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE (~ AII~AMERICA LI1Y ~ ~~ .~~ ~ ~ ~~u~~ 1979 1989 January 9, 1991 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS RICHARD W. ROBER$, 6H~4}RMY4(•J CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT STEVEN A. MCGRAW, y{~.CHAIRMAN CATAWElA MAGISTERAL DISTRICT WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLWS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENSV~~,E' VINTON MAGISTERALL, DISTRICT`ol~l/II Ms. April Yow 129 Hershberger Road, #103 Roanoke, Va 24012 Dear Ms, Yow; This is to advise that at their meeting held on Tuesday, January 8, 1991, the Board of Supervisors voted unanimously to appoint you as a member of the Recycling Advisory Committee to represent the business community. State law provides that any person elected, re-elected a or re-appointed to any body be furnished a co PPointed, Information Act; your co PY of the Freedom of py is enclosed. We are also sending you a copy of the Conflicts of Interest Act. Both of these acts were amended by the Virginia General Assembly in July, 1989. On behalf of the Supervisors and the citizens of Roanoke County, please accept our sincere thanks and appreciation for your willingness to accept this appointment. very truly yours, .~v~ Mary H. Allen, Clerk bjh Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Enclosures Pc: Mr. Gardner Smith, Director, General Services P.O. BOX 29800 • ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24018-0798 • <703) 772-2004 0~ ROANp~.~ ti ~ ~ p Z z ° _ a 18 E50 $$ SFSQUICENTENN~P~ A Beauti~ul Beginning COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE Mr. A. Kyle Robinson 821 Olney Road Vinton, VA 24179 Dear Mr. Robinson: January 9, 1991 ALL•AMERICA CITY I' I I'' 1979 1989 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS RICHARD W. ROBERS. Cii%ttRM7tN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT STEVEN A. MCGRAW. WCTirEHAIRMAN CATAWBA MAGIS'TERW.. DISTRICT LEE B. EDDY WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L JOHNSON HOWNS MAG45TERUIL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS rtC6 VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICTG}MR The Board of Supervisors have asked me to express on their behalf their sincere appreciation for your previous service to the Planning Commission. Citizens so responsive to the needs of their community and willing to give of themselves and their time are indeed all too scarce. This is to advise that at their meeting held on Tuesday, January 8, 1991, the Board of Supervisors voted unanimously to appoint you as a member of the Planning Commission for a four-year term beginning December 31, 1990, and ending December 31, 1994. State law provides that any person elected, re-elected, appointed, or re-appointed to any body be furnished a copy of the Freedom of Information Act; your copy is enclosed. We are also sending you a copy of the Conflicts of Interest Act. Both of these acts were amended by the Virginia General Assembly in July, 1989. It is necessary that you take an oath of office before the Clerk of the Roanoke County Circuit Court. This oath must be administered prior to your participation on this Committee. Please telephone Mrs. Elizabeth Stokes, Clerk, at 387-6208, as soon as possible and arrange to have the oath administered. On behalf of the Supervisors and the citizens of Roanoke County, please accept our sincere thanks and appreciation for your willingness to accept this appointment. Very truly yours, Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors bjh Enclosures pc: The Honorable Elizabeth Stokes, Clerk of Circuit Court Terry Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning (~nixn~~ of ~nttnvkr P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 (703) 772-2004 1/4/91 Mr. Hodge: RE: any meeting about Crystal Creek Road Called VDOT - they have nothing scheduled except Jan 24 public hearing. Called Burton Claxton, President of Crystal Creek Homeowners Association and Civic League. He said they usually have one meeting a month but because of public hearing, they will be meeting January 9, 16, and 23 at 7 p.m. January 9 at Dale Parsons house and other two hopefully at Library. He said county staff would be certainly welcome to attend any of these meeting. He said he was planning to call us today to request that he be put on the agenda for January 8, and 22, under citizens comments. Brenda ~~v ~~~ ~1~ ~O JAS ~,t~'t,~ 1" ~4w~~° ,`~~ ~e~ 0 ~~^~ ti9g~ ti0., The Honorable Douglas Wilder November 14, 1990 Page 2 We are aware that there are viable alternatives to this plan, as well as communities that are eager for this type of road reconstruction. These communities have not expressed the potential for environmental and cultural disaster and are located nearby in an area that would compensate for county expansion in the future. In view of the numerous community concerns and your ability to embrace the essence of the spirit of Virginia and the dignity and pride that accompanies it, we feel that your consideration and support in this matter is of utmost importance. Because the public hearing concerning this plan is in January, we would certainly appreciate your immediate response so that we have ample time to prepare for the hearing. We hope that the County/ State will take the opportunity to preserve Crystal Creek Drive for its historical, environmental, aesthetic and recreational value, rather than burdening the community and the state with the misuse of 4.5 million dollars and a unique and highly potential area. Thank you for your cooperation. Respectfully yours, CRYSTAL CREEK HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION AND CIVIC LEAGUE _ -~ Burton R. Claxton President / ~7 cu~~~~ oy3~~c ~~ ~Q.~~~ ~ ~a- ~"~~ cc: Mr. Ray D. Pethtel, Commissioner Mr. F. C. Altizer, Jr., Resident Engineer Mr. John G. Milliken, Secretary of Transportation Mr. G. Steven Agee, House of Dclegntes Mr. Richard W. Robes, Chairmnn, Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Mr. Steven A. McGraw, Roanoke County Bonrd of Supervisors Mr. Lee B. Eddy, Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Mr. Bob L. Johnson, Ronnokc, County Boetd of Supervisors Mr. Hnrry C. Nickena, Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Mr. Slave Muaselwhite, Commonwealth Transportation Board